I agree with the first poster in this topic. I've worked for YEARS in the topic of Russian / Soviet media, no qualification here, nor can I really be arsed to prove it because it was a question of passion over substance in my eyes, either way, I have been deemed an okay-ish critic of biased texts...well...you know. I laugh in the face of those who call themselves unbiased, and your 'wiki' pompousness. Grow some self awareness. Or at least, a bearable level of cynicism. Christian1985's attitude to the Mail is far, far from unbiased. I've read his additions, deletions, comments carefully. In addition, the fact that numerous calls for a controversy area have been silenced is far from unbiased. The fact is, without a controversy section, an article about a controversial paper is not complete. Christian1985's lack of acceptance that a controversy section may be necessary suggests a frightening bias and narrow-mindedness that distinguishes his contribution to the page and, dear Collect, goes AGAINST the very ethos of wiki that you suggest. 81.104.38.217