, disagreement is not an attack. 

, disagreement is not an attack.

But, I understand that you see any disagreement as an attack. I fully understand that. Your types are hard-wired like that. It is impossible for you to see a disagreement as simply that: a disagreement. No, you see it as an attack. I understand. You are like that. And nothing can change you. That is why you see a disagreement as edit-warring too. You have a wild imagination. And here on Wikipedia you can abuse other editors as you like and as you do. That actually makes Wikipedia what it is. So, keep up your abuse. Wikipedia needs editors like you and Ladislav Mecir to abuse good-faith editors.