"

This looks like pretty obvious WP:UNDUE weight to a WP:FRINGE publication.  Just because something is verifiable does not mean we should publish it - verifiability is merely a prerequisite for inclusion, not a guarantee.  In this instance I can't see what it adds to an article not relevant to socialism to include the views of a socialist publication.  If the argument is that it's not because it's a socialist publication then this critic is on par with any other random magazine critic and is superfluous.  Either way, my !vote is to remove talk "