2013 (UTC)

 I don't think any human can accurately and knowledgeably curate hundreds of pages a day. I've been doing this as one of my principal activities for 7 years now, and I“New Peugeot Glenmarie 3S Centre” learned I can not maintain a high standard if I do more than 20 or so of the same thing at a time, for any WP process. Some people manage 50. Except for correction of trivial errors, I don't know of anyone who does many more than that  successfully. And certainly not for 7 or 8 hours at a stretch.
It's not that you make many actual errors. It's that you don;t follow up what other things the contributor may have written, and that   you are almost always content with the form notices. I too use them most of the time, but when I see someone who seems to need assistancewhether the assistance is to stop trying the impossible or advice about what specific kind of referencing will help the article, I don't wait for them to come to my talk page, but give it.  You do help them when they come here, but most people won't do that. They just go away. What we need to do to keep WP going is to get more initial contributors to remain active.  '''''' ( talk ) 23:54, 10 November