This is the BS I am talking about. You have lied about me and other editors. The Murray information was to support "200 fewer bombers". If you look at Bzuk's talk page you will see I provided him the Murray citation via google books, so that is false as well. And the same for Irving. You didn't bother to trace his citation to the sources section did you? Tut, tut. It reveals the figures for production came from Milch's notes. If you had also bothered to read the next page (p. 164 I believe) Irving demonstrates perfectly clearly what Milch felt about production levels.
This is part of the reason why you were blocked from editing on the Battle of Britain page, and then again for socket puppeting.

I am not refusing to give anything. In fact I can give you the quote for the "77". Only I think I'll do it tomorrow night, given I am tired and you having wasted most my time today.
You should have simply asked for it in the begining, like a normal person, instead of moving everything around and removing my citations.
As for the change in "Romanian" to "Reich", yes it is difficult to work out what Caldwell is referring to. It seems this particular mission was a diversion to the synthetic oil plants in W.Germany (not Polesti). RAF Bomber Command used an attack by the 8AF to attack this target.
In fact, no, I can't resist.
"Two Gruppen of JG 27 were sent up after the RAF Lancasters, but could not get past the swarms of RAF Spitfires and Mustangs. For the day the RLV force lost 44 KIA, 16 WIA, and 77 fighters. The RAF lost no bombers, and one Spitfire"

So there you have it.

So now I would like you to recipricate.