Meh.  It gives a lot of weight to the Bible, which is the holy text of only a portion of the world and therefore gives bias towards Christianity.  It would be original research without a source.  It's an essentially fictional book about a myth.  It sounds kinda listy.  It'll probably piss off a fair number of readers and editors.  It's only an implication, they can always pull out the God/miracle card.  But mostly it'd be unsourced.  Without a pressing reason from a reliable source, there's not a whole lot of merit to it that I can see, but a lot of reasons why it's not necessarily a good idea.