So are you saying you don't think the section in the body of the article is sufficient?  Additionally, I think adding such a category in the first sentence is not a neutral point of view, especially considering that I checked other prominant figures on Wikipedia and they do not have a similar designation, especially not in the first sentence of their articles.  Additionally, while you may disagree with his philosophies and religious beliefs (I do both, myself), I don't think the term is neutral, fair, or correct, especially given his response to the controversy which I assume was the inception of the addition: http://www.hatrack.com/osc_responds_halmets_father.html (added by millernumber1)