By my count, eight editors have participated in this talk thread, and Jayjg is the only one who currently objects to including the section, although several of us agree that it can and should be written better. Seven of us agree that it's a straightforward reading of the sources. Only Jayjg says that it is OR. Not a forum? In regard to discussions of how to write it better? Seriously? Griswaldo is correct: we have a consensus here, broken records notwithstanding.