, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree they would benefit from a common description, which they all shared prior to your edits, all using the term "state-related" which was applied by a separate editor in the case of each article and lasting through review for at least 3 years for Temple and 4 years for the Pitt and PSU articles which speaks to Wikipedia:Silence and consensus.  Do any of their current regular editors of these pages share the same delight in minutia and precision? I don't know. Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania State University seems rather dormant at the moment. The Temple article does not have very active editing.   However, it is no secret that Pitt is my primary editing interest in wikipedia and I'm extremely concerned in the accuracy of articles relating to Pitt and do not feel it benefits wikipedia to compromise that accuracy because of the content of other articles.  However, WP:Consensus is central dogma of wikipedia and the Pitt article should reflect that.   03:21