==T. COTTON LETTER TO THE AYATOLLAHS OF IRAN==

DWP:  Including the text of a U.S. penal statute is "editorialization"? You might say that because, upon reading the text of the statute, and comparing it with what Senator T. Cotton, et al, did, definitely leads to the conclusion that a felony has been committed. Cotton is a shoot-from-the-hip pistol-packer, and he snookered 45 other U.S. Senators into signing a letter to a foreign power, warning our worst enemy not to negotiate with a sitting president. You obviously like Cotton, so you don't want people to read the law which he violated. Que sera sera.   Tom Cotton[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom Cotton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk 

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tom Cotton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk 

Please learn to properly add and format citations. I have edited your entry at Tom Cotton to do so and to remove the quote you inserted from the Logan Act, the inclusion of which here is still editorialization. Instead, I linked to the Logan Act, where readers can judge its relevance for themselves. Also, I'm not sure where or how you obtained my full name, but it is unnecessary (and unwelcome) that you included it in your edit summaries. Please read WP:OUTING. My name as a Wikipedia editor is Dwpaul, and if you name me in an edit summary please use only that name. If you use any other name for me in the future, I will bring it up at WP:AN/I. Dwpaul Talk