You should note the reasons I removed what I removed. Allegations of ties (involvement even?) to terrorism is a pretty serious matter. I deleted allegations that were either 1) refuted by more reliable and current sources (I assumed documents published with the support of Congress in Feb 2006 were more reliable than a magazine website that published articles on the same matter in 2001), 2) inconsistent with the sources actually cited (most of the indictments listed did not involve CAIR, and several allegations of indictment weren't sourced at all), and 3) editorial content that seemed to be founded in the writer's own opinion rather than sourced data. You suggested the information I deleted were 'important'. The information were pungent statements indicative of highly criminal acts on the part of CAIR, info which would have been noteworthy had they been properly documented and cited. Much of that information is refutable with more reliable sources, such as publications produced by the US government. Please discuss before further reverts.