Suggestions that I have for now: 
stop trying to add alimony links to articles; 
provide reliable sources for all your edits.  This one, for example, needs a citation per undue weight
carefully consider the language of your edits; This one  for example, uses the word "highlight" which is a weasel word which promotes a particular view (also it is unsourced, and placed in the lead, and likely being given undue weight.
The section that you added to Alimony is a classic example of synthesis.  You cannot collect together sources to make a point as you have done there.  You need to find sources that make the point itself per verifiability and no original research].  If you want to write about the alimony reform movement you need to find reliably sourced articles about the movement itself. 
This is enough for now. Please read the links I have provided and listed above in the welcome message before editing further . This is important if you wish your edits to stick (important!!), and of course, in the longterm, failure to abide by WP's policies may mean that editing privileges are ended.