At what point does trying to draw attention to tactics like Fillibustering being used to attempt to derail discussion and flood discussions with irrelevant content becoming a personal attack? Do I have to avoid naming specific editors? Is merely pointing out the existence of these tactics and biases without naming editors enough to avoid future blocks? I do not want to sit idly by, when topics I am involved in are getting derailed, filibustered and fought to a standstill of 'no consensus' by certain editors whose only interest is in protecting their own favoured topics, not the actual improvement and following of guidelines in articles I have worked hard on. I hope that wasn't enough of a 'personal attack' for me to get blocked again.