Are you serious? Nobody looks at the article history to get the information they want. All i see is a couple of individuals who have never contributed anything to this article, are not even interested in it's content, and are oblivious to it's importance and interest to the public (22 k hits a month), but somehow feel that they can butcher 6 years worth of work claiming this is what wikipedia wants. You are trying to force policies that were designed to guide not to control, down peoples throats, when you should be looking at the larger picture of what an article provides and it's usefulness, before jumping to castrate it. Just because you have no interest in a subject, you should not feel the need to add your deconstructive urges.