"== older comments ==
Wikipedia is not a repository for links. Wikipedia is a place for articles to be written about various subjects. Please, rather than simply post many links (which are useful, but not primarily), try to write the article yourself. You can use those links as references to build your article. But please, focus on writing, rather than building a large list of external links. 

We can keep the links in here, so we can refer to them, and maybe add them to the article later.  06:20 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

 External Links  
Louise Brooks Society
Louise Brooks blog
Internet Movie Database - entry on Louise Brooks
All Movie Guide - entry on actress
News of Lulu
Louise Brooks Studies
RadioLulu - Louise Brooks themed radio station

For advice on how to write an article, take a look here: Wikipedia:How to start a page . Keep up the tremendous effort!  06:23 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

I'm moving the links back to the newly-expanded article.   

Zoe, if you're the one who did the Louise Brooks editing, kudos to you! It's quite good. 
 EKBK - that was me, back when I wasn't registered. Thanks!  

Verne Equinox - excellent revisions, and headers well selected. When I first wrote the major edit that exists today, I was unregistered and un-used to editing; thanks for the great work!   Feb. 4 2006

 My pleasure.  

 Wrong date? 
""In Europe"" states Pandora's Box is from 1928, ""Filmography"" states it's from 1929. Which one is correct?

 The authoritative Louise Brooks Society lists it as 1929.  The movie was still be filmed when Brooks turned 22; there's a picture of cast & crew celebrating it on the London attic set.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.5.55   

 Philosophy 
I remember reading in one news article about this individual, it was brief and cryptic, concerning pessimistic aesthetics philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.
There seems an unnerving concentration on the film persona (particularly with the one from ""Box"", which I do not think is the best image to dwell on, given that it is one of dehumanization and objectification for varyous fetishistic obsessive types). I have a strong intuition that there was infact ALLOT more to this person then what is being focused on by what appears to be a majority of her fans. Is there any further detail in any of the Seven Seals concerning her philosophy, ideology, and maybe even politics (and at best, religion)? Given her scholarly nature, I strongly doubt any real resemblance to the character of that film. Seek the Forms  

 Tone? 
Hi all, glad to read this article, & I think Louise Brooks is way cool, but I have a quibble:  Here & there, it tends to read like a fansite (i.e., a bit gushy) instead of an encyclopedia article.  Does anyone else have this impression?  I think a few word changes might help.  I can take a shot at it.  

 Oh yeh I have. That and the fact that there is a marked lack of any of her philosophies. I see her, first and foremost, a scholar, who wrote film reviews and seven esseys (their subject is not given in this artical), or even any philisophical works (though, they may have been very, very diluted, given that Shopenhauer was a major influence on her, he held a nihilistic perversion of Neo-Platonism that would lead to social anarchy, followed by dictatorship by the Nietzscheans). I have bumped into this recently and was somewhat impressed, though, not satisfied with a lack of insight into her potentially more important contributions (if any). The secret here is, I suspect most of these people are just obsessed perverts (fans, like you said). Thanks   

IdeArchos: Giv