It is apparent to me that you are happy to write poorly referenced articles but expect higher standards from others. Hounding seems to be your hobby, and fresh from victory over Richard Farnborough you decided to attack me at my editor review, and a very thorough job you made of it. As far as I know we had never come across each other before. You seem to enjoy demolishing others and all you were looking for at the editor review was finding my mistakes and reporting them in a very contemptuous manner. 
I would say that, even with their lack of accurate sourcing, Wikipedia benefits from Weale and your other articles. So what about the articles I write or expand? Are they of overall benefit to the encyclopedia?