Did you try any calm discussion?  No, you left me no less than 8 templates accusing me of vandalism.  Why are you only apologising for the first one?  You need to explain why you even left that when anyone with half a brain could see that my edit was not vandalism.  Did you even look at what you were reverting?  You reverted twice within the same minute as the edits I made, and when I asked you why () you reverted that within the same minute as well.  When I tried to ask the previous editor who stupidly reverted my edit why he did that, you reverted my edit to his page twice, both times less than a minute after I left it.  How exactly was I supposed to communicate with you?  
Now, User:Qwyrxian, sure I know that civility is a policy.  And I'm always civil if I don't have to deal with idiots who accuse me of vandalism when they just lack the intellect to see what I was doing.  I mean, a 5 year old could tell that none of my edits were vandalism.  It seems obvious to me that reverting constructive edits with offensive accusations of vandalism is much, much more damaging to a project which is supposed to be about creating an encyclopaedia than one person calling another person a fucking idiot.  So I followed the WP:IAR policy. 190.163.3.204