January 2009 (UTC)

If Wikipedia decides to semi-protect or totally protect a generic conceptual confusion, then stupidity must have reached its top. Worse than that can it not become. An encyclopedia that guards total conceptual confusion with all its forces must be a world and historical record of stupidity. Can the editors of Wikipedia really agree on protection of conceptual confusion, like, "yes, the article about clade is a mess and we protect this mess. We also protect propagation of this mess into other concepts in this encyclopedia. We do not allow any resolving contribution of this confusion anywhere in this encyclopedia. It is a cladistic encyclopedia. We like conceptual messes". Such protection would at least be typically cladistic. (Take care, because cladistics does actually deny that 1=1). Mats, presently at 83.254.20.63  23:39, 8