You're doing some fine work there and elsewhere, Ashley. One of the remarkable things about many of these articles is how little of the actual evidence, chipped in by dozens of hands variously over time, has been rechecked, and the overall text reviewed when all refs have been consulted. It was quite a mess when I first starting working on it 2 years ago. In the good old bad days, every intelligent edit had to be pushed like s*** up a hill with slippy fingers before a quarter of it would stick. I hope these days things, esp. after the new dispensation earlier this year, work more smoothly. Well done. (p.s. 'in the sacking' = during the sackage?)