In following the wikipedia guidleline concerning academic boosting  , removal of the words like excellence and prominence have been a problem.  Although statements like "least happy students" may appear to be a slap in the face, it is something that the school has actually been ranked in.  There are numerous guides including the US News and World Report and the Princeton review being the biggest ones rate and rank accoding to numerous subjective guidelines.   Even the school newspaper ranks speaks about St. John's rankings in the newspaper and praises it's inclusion. .  The good and the bad gives a fair perspective.  Simply stating what is good white washes history and is unencyclopedic.  It's like Duke blanking out the lacrosse rape scandal, or UNLV not speaking about the it's NCAA violations.    .  St. John's university along with stony brook are notable to have included the least happy students..  There has been no removal of the top 10 wireless ranking that St. John' has been given, so there isn't any NPOV violations.  Scandals isn't an appropriate place for the st. john's ranking of least happy students.  Most likely a rankings portion is needed.  Which is what i'll create.  thanks .