And now you claim that by restoring that well sourced section and reverting your unilateral changes to the lead I am edit warring "against consensus". How? Where is this imaginary consensus that says that there should be no section on the legal status of this settlement? The IPCOLL page specifies that large articles with multiple sections should include a section on the legal status so that it may be summarized in the lead. How are your unilateral changes to the lead done "with consensus". Please, show me this "consensus". nableezy -