You're wrong. They did not think that "profits should be divided equally amongst all producers, employer and employee alike with no hierarchy in the workplace." YOu're just making this stuff up off the top of your head. They thought that that there would be no profits due to free market competition. It is not a matter of splitting profits up, but that they just wouldnt exist. They thought that competition would drive prices to match up with labor costs of production. And you're wrong about them opposing "Employer-Employee hierarchy." Voltairine de Cleyre, in explaining individulist anarchism, said "individualist anarchists, "the system of employer and employed, buying and selling, banking, and all the other essential institutions of Commercialism, centered upon private property, are in themselves good, and are rendered vicious merely by the interference of the State." And you're wrong that they opposed absentee ownership. They supported full private property rights for the product of labor, except most of them oppose it for land. Lysander Spooner was an exception. He had the same Lockean ownership of land philosophy as anarcho-capitalists.