Addressing:
I'd just call this section "Opinion" or "Decision" and toss "of the court" -JMO, I won't kick if you want to keep it.  
, per WP:SCOTUS/SG.  Boomer!  
Photos of Souter and Rehnquist are "sandwiching" the text, which I hear is the worst wiki-crime you can possibly commit ( /snark)  Maybe right justify Souter and bump Rehnquist down to the dissent section and left-justify his image...
, per WP:SCOTUS/SG.  Boomer!  
and you should expand the dissent a bit too, it's sketchy...  
I'm going to read the actual decision before I comment further on this section, but while you are doing a copyedit, remember to either expand or merge your one-sentence paragraphs.  
But until then, IMHO, consider that the GA should perhaps be longer than the syllabus of the case itself...  ?  Just saying ;-)  
Consider expanding the "Subsequent developments" subsection into a full section and discuss the impact of the case.