Yes, I stated above:In fact, in interviews, West has said he has worked for Clinton and both Bushs.which I got from reliable sources vs. his purported statements on Wikipedia which, as you know, have no standing here. Hence why I redacted the term "Republican strategist". I'm unsure how WP:SYNTH applies here, borderline or otherwise. That is when an editor:puts together multiple sources to reach a novel conclusion that is not in any of the sources That isn't happening here. There are two sources which each independently put these facts together and draws the conclusion not the editors.

I am not the author of this section but an editor working to resolve the undue problems (which I'm sure you've noticed we've taken steps to remedy) and perceived POV problems; I come with no sympathies per se.  I don't see how this paragraph (after I rewrote it) reflects the author's bias. It (properly) reflects the source's biases which is allowed on Wikipedia, per WP:NPOV:As the name suggests, the neutral point of view is a point of view, not the absence or elimination of viewpoints. The neutral point of view policy is often misunderstood. The acronym NPOV does not mean "no points of view". The elimination of article content cannot be justified under this policy by simply labeling it "POV". Labeling this section as having a POV problem is not a sufficient argument. The criticism is attributed explicitly to those making said criticism which satisfies WP:NPOV and WP:V. You may characterize the sources as "minor" but they are both reliable sources. And, you are correct, they are "clearly" claiming her bias was the motivation for her mode of attack  but not the page editors.

That said, I agree that the section requires  additional viewpoints  for instance, it should include reactions from the conservative side that said that Biden's attitude was wrong, the interview was proper and that West's affiliations should not be used to judge her. This was addressed on the Larry King show, Chris Mathews show and the Rush Limbaugh show among many others. I can work on that but would like first to resolve this issue. Thoughts?  cogito·sum