The way I might see it, user:DickL is that 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/27_February_2012/Wikipedia:Verifiability&diff;=480104641&oldid;=480102972
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/27_February_2012/Wikipedia:Verifiability&diff;=next&oldid;=480177280
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/27_February_2012/Wikipedia:Verifiability&diff;=next&oldid;=480182638

At that page I was insulted from day one and ought to think about drawing that to the mediators attention as if that mattered now.
 
# (3) words redacted as personal attack> I have not "taken on" or involved myself here, just a few grammar tweaks. Dicklyon (talk)  ((Dicklyon, anyone can make mistakes, for an -))
 (42) words redacted as personal attack> Dicklyon (talk) 

After all user:Dicklyon you withdrew in a huff from the Mediation, blaming me, and then disobeyed the ground rules to carry out a revert off your own bat that the Mediator ought to have considered. Duh? Do you care to answer, for the interest that you may redact those forty odd words not that I am begging, it's that I wish to make it up with you.  ( talk)