I agree, and have trimmed the article back considerably.  I do appreciate the amount of work that went into gathering the information here, but I must insist that Wikipedia is not the place for this kind of data-gathering. If someone wants to collate the charts and timelines of this term, a better place is on a personal website or blog, not on a Wikipedia page.   Wikipedia should only be used to summarize data after it has been published in major reliable sources such as books and newspapers.   It should not be used to aggregate information from campaign websites, and it should especially not be used to try and make a case that a term was "coined" on such and such a date, when the only source is someone's blog.  Please, let's keep the article pared down to RS information only. onka