"

 are you a troll? 

You call me a troll.
Let's review the facts:
All ancient sources (I AM a historian) mention about 30,000 Dacian warriers in the first war (the so called ""Scond Battle of Tapae""😉, which was not at all a battle of Tapae, but the battle for Sarmizegetusa, a few miles only further, never conquered by the romans, which fled scared shitless to Adamclisi, 700km further east, where the battle for the Dacian capital Sarmizegetusa also ended! With a shrine inscripted with more than 3,000 fallen roman soldiers, only the limited wall surface of the shrine limiting the names inscriptions.., this also being called by you ""a decissive roman victory""😉 for Sarmizegetusa, not conqered at that time by the romans, which started towards it but were stopped at Tapae, and when the Dacians stopped fighting because of the legendary ""strange storm"", ""anger of the Dacian Gods"", and they were defenceless, the romans, also a few miles only from Sarmizgetusa and open for taking, ran as crazy 700km in 4 days, to their reserve troops at Adamclisi.. and you call this ""decisive roman victory""😉), and 15,000 Dacian soldiers in the second big war, of AD 105, ending in 106AD.
This correct troops amount stayed a few decades (anyway many years; I made screenshots at some point for a school documentary), and only recently somebody vandalised the site changing the amount in a couple of hundred thousands, with NO SOURCE REFERENCES what so ever, and he couldn't do it too as all historical info points out the tiny Dacian army at that time.
YOU, as administrator, in sted of correcting the vandalism and restore the page, didn't give a damn..
When I came and restored the info, doing YOUR JOB, you acuse me of ""vandalism""😉, and that ""I am partial to the Dacians"", while you are the one partial to the romans and to vandalism.
Further more, you acuse me that ""being partial to the Dacians""😉, I said that the Dacians won, not the romans, adding that ""I did not attach sources ref./proof""😉.

On the page of the First Battle of Tapae, was allways mentioned (with source ref. attached; poorly and only 1 source while there are many.. but OK) that the governer (of the invading roman army in the DACIAN Moesia) was killed together with his army (that is correct). 
This first battle of Tapae (again BS; it was the battle of the romams for Sarmizegetusa, also stopped at Tapae, Sarmizwgetusa was NOT conquered, that's why was called The battle of ""Tapae"" which was nothing, just an emlty field, and the roman empire does NOT fight to conquer grass and empty fields) was also lost by the roman army which was totally defeated/anhilated, and even Fuscus died in battle. All these info are correct and o  your/that page. Accepted by you as administrator.
You call this ""a roman victory""😉.
If i call it as it is,  a Dacian victory, you call me a troll and tell me that ""that didn't happened"", meaning Dacian victory.
Than WHAT do you call it? 
It's a retorical question.
I am a pretty known international history investigator, and my coleagues often make fun of the wikipedia trolls which poses as administrators. I mean.. the facts speak for themselfs. You change Dacian victories in ""indecisive battle"", and indecisive battles in ""roman victory"", which makes you automaticaly bias, and history falsifier, obviously in favour of the invading hoodlam romans. 
You go so far in presenting the invading (into Dacian teritories) romans as ""the good guys"" and the Dacians as ""bad guys"", that you even post totally ridiculous texts like ""the Dacians invaded Dacia, and the romans (coming beligerantly all the way from Italy) were right to punishe the Dacians for that""😉.
How criminal are you?
About you history knowlwdge (if any) is pointless to ask. Right?
All the so called (also BS because the Dacians never started nor wanted war) ""Dacian Wars"", which were actually Roman wars, started by the invading roman army, and all took place OUTSIDE Italy, into Dacian/Thracian teritories. Roman wars, and you call them ""Dacian wars"", to manipulate the readers on subliminal levels.

Moesia, which was also Dacian teritory (by the way, you can find this info also on wikipedia if you have no official sources), invaded, masacred and robbed by the roman army coming from Italy, when saved from the romans by the Dacians (as it was part of Dacia), is called by you on your page ""murdering dacians""😉, ""the dacians swarmed into Moesia to rob and pilleage""😉.. and other bullshit.
So the dacians were the robbers or the romans??
And WHAT did the Dacians had to rob from their own dacian teritory?? Didn't they have more GOLD than they knew what to do with it, gold stolen by the ROBBER Trajan in AD 106 from Dacia in such huge quantities that the roman empire florished as never before?
This info is also o