"Controversially" is a perfectly acceptable word when describing the usage of "conspiracy theory". To put things simply, anyone using "conspiracy theory" in a scientific or encyclopedic context is trying to trick people, not trying to advance science neutrally. Funny you should say it's "not clear what a dubious narrative genre is" since that was your argument over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. Another thing I find funny is this unclear dubious narrative genre can somehow be used to defend a phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation. In my opinion we should completely rewrite "narrative genre" but since your argument passed (for now) over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory we are stuck with it, sorry.  T