Cleanup urgently needed 
Urgent request for Wikipedia admin to cleanup this article - either stick to the facts or delete article. 
The Ronald Ryan article is full of alleged unproven hearsay ... "Ryan said that, Ryan did that, Ryan admitted to that, Ryan confessed to that, Ryan told him/her this and that. All these unproven stories are most unprofessional and unethical, as are the personal opinions/views of certain named people. These are simply not the facts!  
Why are the "referenced facts" on Ryan continually being vandalized, altered, manipulated, and often deleted by User:Purrum and replaced with unproven made-up allegations? 
Fact is that what Ryan is alleged to have said to whom has never been proven, confirmed nor recorded - there is no evidence anywhere!   
The facts are that there was a total lack of scientific ballistic forensic evidence to prove Ryan guilty. the factual serious ambiguities in the case, the factual dire inconsistencies of all eyewitnesses' evidence, the missing pieces of vital evidence that also could not be scientifically tested, the fact that only Paterson's one single fired shot was heard by all persons. and the most unusual pleas by jury members not to execute Ryan (maybe they had second thoughts about Ryan's guilt). Finally, the fact that the public heard Brosnan's comments on ABC Australia National Radio in 2007 ...  I don't know who's shot killed who! ... which should have put an end to all the unproven allegations still being made about Ryan confessing guilt. Brosnan clearly stated that he did not know who's bullet killed who. Thgey were Brosnan's own words on national radio and he never said Ryan confessed guilt at all.
60.224.64.166