Lets Discuss Genetics and Logic, Here 

Does the absence of EU alleles in one geographically Western, Clovis era man (Anzick-1) inherently "disprove" the presence of early EU man on the continent? Of course it doesn't. Following that logic, Norse colonization of the Americas is all a big myth as there is no genealogical record of their presence among Canadian first nations people. With current (and most meaningful) archaeological discoveries on the pre-Clovis issue clustering almost entirely in the mid-Northeast of the United States and being unarguably WAY pre-Clovis per strata, the 'genetic refutations' of Solutrean have been tangential at best, agenda driven at worst. The genetic itself question is a critical one, one that deserves robust discussion and the article does, in fact, contain just such a discussion, however the statement that sequencing remains from Anzick-1 'disproves' Solutrean is not a valid statement.