Go over to the Vladimir Lenin page and remove the photos of the bodies arguing "Lenin did not carry out these acts himself" and see if the consensus supports your view.  You could also go over to the Karl Hermann Frank page and complain that the article portrays the subject as a "baby killer" because of the imagery included.  The fact of the matter is that your "nowhere" claim is simply false.  "Where" must be and is assessed on an article by article basis.  In this case the civilian deaths consequent to Harris' policy is a non-trivial issue with respect to Harris and his legacy.  You state here that Harris' policy should be disagreed with on the basis of targets being too strongly defended etc, ie without reference to the issue of civilian casualties.  The fact of the matter is that there IS an issue.  WP:NPOV means a full and frank presentation, not a whitewash.  I should think that such a presentation should be possible without the WP:CENSORship you demand.  I've already tried to accommodate your concerns with respect to the prominence this is given, but I take it you are unwilling to entertain any compromise.  I would invite you to consult Wikipedia:Assume good faith and consider the possibility that I am interested in making Wikipedia more informative and encyclopedic as opposed to "dirty"ing anyone.