Sorry, the "three revert" thing was my mistake. For the record, the issue it NOT whether the "hat" section should be included on the Frank Rossitano, but whether there should be a discussion about it first or, at the very least, whether Jeffrey O. Gustafson should provide an explanation that is actually an explanation and not a sarcastic put-down. (On the talk page he wrote "We are an encyclopedia. I've linked the word for people who seem to forget what that is," which surpasses any of my comments in everything but cleverness.)
The "indiscriminate collection of information" section of WP:NOT does not explicitly cover the issue, as Jeffrey O. Gustafson seems to believe, and I believe there is definitely room for some POV. Again, this could have been settled in a debate, but Jeffrey O. Gustafson was just too good for that. He went on repeatedly deleting the section even after I added a big honkin notice that said not to for the time being. YOU tell me what I was supposed to do.