new edits 

The new edits overwrite what was an account of Planck's classification cited by Guggenheim. So that account was not uncited, though the edit cover note complained of lack of citation. The term 'unrealistic' is not used by those sources and is an unnecessary editorial interpolation. It seems the new edit was made without consultation of the cited sources. The further comments are gratuitous uncited editorial opinion and do not reflect what the cited sources Planck and Guggenheim say.