I just worked with the web-accessible version of the citation available. If you can verify the full quote in context as part of an actual review then of course go ahead and restore it. Sandwiched between the unsourced Daily Mail quote and the review in the National Alliance (probably the world's largest outright neo-Nazi organization) I might have been a little biased in how far I trusted the citation. I don't know exactly what a medical doctor, expert in urology, would have to do with reviewing a book about neurology, or why we should necessarily take his opinion seriously, but whatever, that's really not my concern. If it's a verifiable review, and you can personally verify it, then just go ahead and revert my edit (you don't need permission! )