RfC: Should the lead include the owner's description - without giving undue weight to other reliable sources? 

As per the RfC above, 6 people opposed entirely to including the owner's description, and 5 (4 + me) support the idea of including it, but making the sentence neutral so that it does not give undue weight to what other sources say. So I am making a new RfC, because making a bold edit (which Mann_jess suggested) will be met with a definite revert, so there is no point in that.

So, how about changing the lead from:

"Stormfront is a white nationalist,[2] supremacist[3] and neo-Nazi[4] Internet forum that was the Internet's first major hate site.[5]"

To Maunus' suggested version:

"Stormfront is a white nationalist,[2] supremacist[3] and neo-Nazi[4] Internet forum that was the Internet's first major hate site.[5] Don Black, the website's founder, states that the site's purpose is not to promote white supremacy, but rather white pride and white nationalism.[6][7]"

Do all six who voted "oppose" in the previous RfC still vote the same?