Tawker: With the first sentence, your second edit to that is fine, although I saw no reason to tinker with the sentence in the first place. my mistake I just got mixed up between that and your first edit which wasn't so neutral sounding.

With the second paragraph, it's relevancy is in question, it is not notable, and it is an non-constructive edit.  Howcome you didn't bring this up in the discussion page like you are supposed to. You are on wikipedia long enough you should know this.  

Also, you added another unqualified edit to the 2008 referendums section.  We talked about this didn't we? You and I, I don't understand why you'd go ahead and insert "independent elections administrator."  We were talking about this for days but then you try to sneak it in the backdoor. Be upfront and reasonable, let's talk this shit out or the page is going to continue to be crappy, marred by bad grammar, spelling mistakes, and non-neutral language.