? No. That's your interpretation. I simply removed my contributions to those articles. (Whether said contributions improved those articles or not, is matter of opinion. Apparently your opinion was that my edits were improvement. Gee thanks. But it doesn't have to be everyone's opinion, does it? Not even mind sometimes, since my edit history is filled with self-reverts.) You are wrong about "can't take it back", since any self-revert does just that, and self-reverts are permitted, Mr. Mann jess. Again, it is just a matter of opinion whether my edits were improvements or disimprovements. It isn't an objective thing as you portend to assert. I don't have any "feud" with you, Mann jess. I just can't stand your aggressive bulliness, and overconfidence in the subject matter. And won't go through what is necessary to oppose your disimprovements to articles, because Quale has your back, and has already complimientd you, and disparaged me. So go for it. Keep making those improvements to chess articles. (BTW, it's "chess", not "Chess". A check is a condition on the board, not a move. A short sentence should not have 4 commas. Proofs are not "sample games". Demo programs to aid understanding an article subject that no amount of text can convey, are not "against policy".) I think you suck as editor. But your tramping ground is here at WP to prove your ego. Go tramp on the ground then. Beat your drum. Just stay the hell away from me, you aggressive moron.