Well exactly the point i've been making, you show NO interest in articles until i've contributed to them.  As soon as I do, youre all over them like a rash- rearranging, editing here and there, then spamming me with line after line of pointless drivel- all to no valid contribution.  Its just a Harassment & Baiting campaign.  Aided and abetted with hacks of the edit summary of articles to remove evidence of your contributions.

As for your PhD in History and knowledge of the period- where is the evidence of knowledge of the period?  If you know so much why hadn't you actually updated or looked at the articles in all the time of your membership?  I'm sorry, it doesn't fly Damac.  Any serious knowledge of the period would be noted via your contributions, because a number of the articles on the period contain glaring inaccuracies.  

What I have seen is very little knowledge, but a large amount of readiness to harass and distract a serious contributor.  Your efforts not culminating in an attempt to have him removed because he knows more on the subject than you do!  Please grow up, end your hacking and end your nonsense about qualifications- on here the only qualification worth having is being aware of the facts.