Well you can't risk being blocked and thus your version of this article being reverted -so of course you're amused (as a misdirection).  More importantly you've dodged addressing the scientific point(s).   Also like a predictable troll you took the 'mispeling bait' (overlooking the correctly spelled version earlier in the sentence) and went on and bloviated from there hoping your futile misdirection would 'stick'.  LOL - we'll something sticks - that's fo sure.  But of course, you then had to follow up with a diaply of your immense knowledge of WP procedures etc etc no doubt trolling for a 'barn fish to the head -whack!' or whatever!  lol.
Oh yes - but of course YOUR tolerance and amusement and 'advise' and complicity (via fantasy slam remarks) attests to your overblown view of yourself and delusions about your skill in rightly dividing 'worth' from 'worthless'.  Your reward is that all your time spent here will be to no avail when it all gets 'speed deleted' and 'reverted' with the same air of arrogance as you have demonstrated here.  What comes around goes around - lol.  Carry on fool cs the youngins' need to see a sterling example of a blowhard editor like yourself to realize to steer clear of such a time-wasting task and exercise in self-delusion/power tripping.