If this is true, we should keep in mind that this info should ultimately be on the page for this topic.  The trick is supporting that it's true, of course.  I looked at your source for the ballot, and it's unclear to me how recent the information on that page is (I couldn't find a date of publication for the info, and my half-knowledge of Spanish may be insufficient to help me know whether this is or is not the current government's ballot for the upcoming elections (as opposed to the ballot as it had existed previously, before the crisis).  But if it is the current government's version of the ballot, that's interesting, especially since it seems like César Ham in particular should be disqualified by Article 239 just as it was argued Zelaya was.  (Possibly Reyes as well, but definitely Ham given that he participated in the "reclaiming of the ballots" thing.)  That's an inconsistency in the argument of the Micheletti side.

I note that this is a Honduran source, which may not be admissible under the current "Honduran newspapers are likely to be mouthpieces for the establishment, so they're not reliable sources" view which has been prevailing here, but it's unlikely a pro-Micheletti source, on the other hand, would lie about what Micheletti's formal position is.  We could probably trust it to print what Micheletti says will be on the ballot.  I'm more concerned that I'm not sure the source you've posted here has a date indicating that it is the current version of the ballot.