I'm not making a personal attack, but I am questioning whether you are impartial.  I think it is quite well established that impartiality is critical when providing public information.  I believe you should state unequivocally whether you are financially compensated by Adobe so other readers can fairly judge your motivations.  This becomes a critical issue over time since someone who is paid can keep arguing forever, whereas someone who wishes to add content because they believe it to be accurate and in the best public interest to distribute will eventually give up.  Whatever the case, I hope a disinterested third party will make a judgement so I can move on.  If they say I'm wrong and the information should not be present, I'll drop it immediately, but if they say the content should be present I think it should be added and you should be prevented from removing it.