From what I have been able to see when looking at  he only likes captions like B-57 in a hanger and B-57 flying - useless information.  Captions should spell out who, what, when, where (this a the basic when taking an class on basic writing).  Real aviation historians want details - I say as a aviation historian that if you have a photo then you have to give its history.  Bill say that this information should be spelled out in the artile, fine - lets delete all photo captions and go back to cave paintings.

 Bill also did not mention that when he reverted back to an earlier version that he also destroyed a lot of information that was added to the notible section - this is vandalism and I feel that maybe Bill need to be removed from being an editor for a few months

  states that an image is to illustrate different points in the article - this is a garbage statement if every I heard one - if that was the case lets remove every picture that has
 "B-57 sitting in a hanger" and YOH-5A LOH or even Croatian Bell-427 landing (gee an airplane landing) -lots of details lots of research there.  As far as specificilly with MilborneOne I did a random sample of his article (aviation) and a vast majority do not have any phots associated (in fact most of his articles seem to have been lifted right out of Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation or The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft - doe not take much to to copy work already published