2008 (UTC)

If there is one thing worse than a knowitall, it's a smug knowitall.  Unfortunately, you are wrong yet again.  I may have been deleted from the first place it was put, but it is allive and well where it ended up (just checked - still there).  And the diffs are where I put them as well.  The subsequent e-mail discussion shows it was taken seriously.  Basically your card has been marked.  I never expected Wikipedia admin to do anything much as they never usually do.

At least you are self confessed knowitall since you stated publically that you delete material where it conflicts with you own knowledge (with, of course, the classic hallmark of the knowitall - the anonuymous reference book).  In my experience, and I have no doubt that is considerably greater than yours, knowitalls rarely know very much about anything.  

Oh, and by the way: the book 'Railway Signalling on British Railways' by Richard Knedham AFIRSE (That's Associate Fellow of the Institute of Railway Signalling Engineers to you - and thus, I am certain, more highly qualified than an anorak such as youreslf.) says that you are wrong (yet again!) about the tokenless block (which incidentally was not my edit).  He states that the tokenless block has become a generic term for any single track system where the driver does not take possession of a physical token.

Oh and your sockpuppetry allegation got treated with the contempt that it deserved - not helped when you tried to claim evidence that was actually supplied by yourself.   Your attitude to others betrays your obvious immaturity.   That's not incivility - it's blatantly obvious fact.   15:59, 1 December