You can redact all you want newseventsguy, the demonstrated fact here on this talk page is that you, gaba p, skepticalraptor, Connelley and a wide variety of other wikipedia editors on this page are guilty of the exact same thing that you are complaining about, editing out contributions to the page WITHOUT DISCUSSION, multiple times over a long period of time, while admitting that you are not familiar with the peer reviewed literature. Look at the top of this page. What do you find? Discussion. And these are trivial edits merely attempting to ad secondary and tertiary peer reviewed references to the controversy. You are unable to justify that, so you just 'edit it out'. Feel free to add some credible discussion to this page if you can, but all you've been doing thus far is stifling discussion and removing credible scientific references from the page.