You should also be aware that this user is on a power trip, and runs around rejecting unblocks without even reading the article in question or its history, such as the following exchange after an article repeatedly criticized for being more of a public relations puff piece than an enclyclopedia article was reverted by users trying to make sure that it remains a public relations puff piece who then blocked the person making the edits intended to make the article more balanced.  Note this user's response, he'd rather reject than read:
Request reason: "The blocker has taken action for the sole purpose of converting a wikipedia page into an advertisement and seems intent on preventing value-free commentary if it does not further the editor's agenda of turning the page into a public relations vehicle for its subject. The lack of integrity shown in the reversions promulgated by this 'editor' are indeed appalling."

Decline reason: "What are you basing this on? — Yamla (talk) "