Your suggestion that the 'Literature' section should perhaps come first indeed sensible on reflection as your remark about a lead section and I will revise the article if it is restored. The list has to stay though. Really the whole reason I wrote the artcile was because I was so struck that every  emerging Western Buddhism group I offhand know of over the past fifty years has been tarnished, not just peripherally but at its heart, by this sort of sexual scandal and this is what makes it notable (I saw a remark that perhaps the page wasn't needed and but for this I would be inclined to agree - the trouble is if I make much of that then I fall into the 'original research' trap ). The first paper I reference essentially addresses the issue in an interesting, and I think correct, way. I did look at the FWBO article you mention and list it as an external source and I think one of the references (essentially favourable) I supplied came from there. It was also the basis of the remark I made that the community remained supportive of its founder. But I stress I'm not prepared to interest myself further in a page like this unless my original version is restored. Thank you for your remarks. Appreciated.