Why reiterate "civil disorder"?

The law already contains codes against "civil disorder", so by saying "enforce the law AND reduce civil disorder" one is reiterating the point. Why?. If one takes the totality of the law, one will quickly see that the number of laws aimed at protecting property are much greater than those that talk about "reducing civil disorder" (in fact, the majority of crimes in our society are property-related). So if one had to reiterate a point that already exists in the law, "enforcing the law and protecting property" would make more sense than "enforce the law and reduce civil disorder" 69.228.251.134