I know no such thing.  It's possible that your computer was displaying a cached version of the page, in which case you would have seen a prior version.  However, the edit history shows the sequence of events clearly.  The fact is that you jumped to the assumption that I was operating in bad faith, which is something that your history shows you do all too often.

What I was asking you to redact was not the "if that can be sourced properly" bit — that was a simple error.  What I objected to was your statement, "I see you are now joining in the Bad Faith discussion that Richard Arthur Norton is perpetrating, in which you reply to or redact commentaries in a way that deliberately makes mine look as though I am ignoring what you say. Deplorable behavior."  I have done no such thing, and the evidence shows it.  Please strike through that passage. — (talk • contribs)