Oh, now you're comparing the legendary Phil Hellmuth to a pint of rocky rhode ice cream?      What has this discussion degraded into.  Different people have different tastes, but Hellmuth's television appeal can be statistically proven.  Perhaps "popular television" would be more accurate, but the phrase "great television" is understood to mean just that.  "Ice cream tastes great" is not analagous because the verb 'tastes' serves as a link between the noun 'ice cream' and the adjective 'great' implying that ice cream is objectively great.  This would be a foolish leap and it would violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy.  Please keep this dialogue on topic and refrain from such faulty analogs.  The subject matter of this discussion is Phil Hellmuth, not ice cream or your aversion to personal attack.
    Let's let others chime in on this topic and come to a clear consensus.  Hellmuth's television appeal is an integral part of his notoriety, and excluding it simply because one user deems it to opinioniated would do a terrible injustice to his page and a disservice to the Wikipedia community.  Voice your opinions here.