2015 Minneapolis shooting 

2015 Minneapolis shooting:   You said, 
"User:Mr. Granger was correct that we cannot use eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact. You state that you are simply using the video as a primary source, but that is not what you wrote in the article. You did not say that the video shows someone claiming to be a member of the group and claiming that such and such happened, You simply inserted the person's statement as facts. Meters (talk) "   While I initially referred to "the video" as being a "primary source", I later clarified that statement to recognize that once the video was placed on YouTube, YouTube being analogous to a magazine or newspaper, it became in that form a secondary source.  As such, I can quote from that video without it being called "us[ing] eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact".  (Besides, it wasn't "testimony":  It was not given under oath, but it WAS given before a camera, and the resulting video was placed on YouTube, and thus in that form it was a secondary source.)  Go back and re-read what I subsequently wrote.  I refer to this later.