Er, we did not arrive at that version by consensus. You just made it up and put it on the page – there was no discussion about the version you implemented. Plus then edit warring to try and implement it here was a poor faith WP:POINT violation.
As for your comments about Nohlen, he is regarded as one of the world's experts on elections, particularly Latin America. His books open with the preface that his data is often different from that produced by "official" sources because he corrects mistakes they made and didn't admit. For example, in this instance where you have added the official results, the vote counts are all lower than Nohlen's figures, suggesting that the official figures omitted something, perhaps one polling station or votes from abroad. WP:SOURCE makes it clear that "third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" are preferable to primary sources (such as election authorities).  57