No, you have not explained how "X is Y" is somehow not clearer, simpler and more objective than "X is best known for Y".  You have not explained why you are insisting on putting opinions into the article.  You are too stupid to distinguish between fact and opinion and that's a remarkable handicap for someone who is editing an encyclopaedia.  You really should learn the difference.  In the mean time, perhaps my next edit will indicate to you just what a moronic crusade you are on here.  190.162.52.196