DavidWBrooks, I would suggest that if you have spent a month intensively editing the iridology entry, it's possible you feel emotionally-invested in the task. It may be better for all if you turn your efforts to more fruitful and productive entries, instead of continually trying to add "con" to this "pro" entry. It was recently pointed out to me that some of my editions to the big bang entry were inappropriate, because an entry for a subject is the place to support the subject, not to tear it down. The suggestion was made to me that I move my proposed editions to where they would be appropriate, in "non-standard cosmology" entries. I now make this suggestion to you. If you seek to criticize iridology, you should not do it in the entry meant to explain and support iridology. Perhaps you can make an entry titled "non-standard iridology" or maybe even "fringe theories about iridology" if you want to challenge the mainstream iridologists. Just a suggestion, I hope it will help you as much as it helped me. -  16:48, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)