I appreciate your reasoned explanation of the edits, Lucericr, but it is still troubling that Chzz chose to enforce Wikipedia's policies for personal rather than objective reasons (and please, no more inane references to WP:AGF or the like; it is perfectly obvious why Chzz felt motivated to decimate my contributions to the Soft3D page). It is becoming abundantly clear that this web site's objectivity is compromised by a small group of privileged admins, some of whom manipulate policy and selectively enforce standards to their own personal tastes. So much for the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit." If you really want to claim that your policies are enforced fairly, then I challenge one of you to edit the Softimage XSI page in the same way Chzz edited the Soft3D page. The XSI page, not written by me, contains similar unreferenced descriptive passages and "laundry-lists" of features, yet Chzz, remarkably, felt no need to correct its flaws.
Either way, I don't have time to get involved in protracted arguments with teenagers every time I contribute to this site. As a third-year law student I have better things to do than convince Wikipedia to bestow upon me dubious the honor of retaining the information that I provide to it free of charge.