It's a political treatise. Like a math book - who wrote it or why is irrelevant ( except for motivation... ) if the ideas in it portray reality ( real events and history ) accurately then it has soome value. If the book ( math ... ) gets it all wrong then you revise/dump it. Is the article ever going to get down to discussing where the Protocols are incorrect? Whining about what bad guys wrote it just prolongs the agony - who ever wrote it and/or even why they did may be interesting but off the point.159.105.80.141