It appears to only be in beta phase and has no links outside of wikipedia.  I've stated and shown my research is backed by the same very references that are posted on this particular page.  An example if I may? There is a famous book by a capt mayarat that discusses them mint julep in 1839.  This same book is again mentioned in Jerry Thomas's how to mix drinks.  Now this books states that "no stirring is allowed".  Which is true, no stirring is allow the book does say that, so many bartenders just build this drink. BUT and this is a big BUT if you keep reading it also says the drink is to be swizzled, which is a preparation technique you may or may not be familiar with.  
This was such a great example. So yes, those very books that are referenced on this particular page, only go to validate my edits. 

The question is still not answered, more equal than others does not facilitate blatant disregard for factual published literature.  I am no equal, but I would love to believe I am. The point is the books that are referenced on the page must be removed if my contribution is not allowed, because I reference the same books. How should expect others to react to future contributions if such a small contribution caused so much distress? That's rhetorical, but I assumed you know that.