"Not a single user is willing to include technical information" 

This is not true! I have advocated for including more info - and when I did my rewrite I tried to smash everything in there I could. It has to be accessable to the general public though as this is not a science article. Your recent edits indicate you are more willing to work with us then the last user, so please discuss before changing. Simply accusing other users of stuff and blindly reverting is just going to get people mad. If you discuss each point first, I'd hope you'd be surprised at how reasonable the editors of that article are.