Errol, unless you explain why you say you have "reason to doubt" the veracity of the transcript, you're just being provocative and insulting.  Come on, that's a viscious accusation and you should back it up properly not with vague innuendo.  So I will ask you once again, who told you that the transcript is fraudulent?  If you won't say, that says it all. Your reference to the judicial process is so misplaced it's not funny.  If you're calling me or, perhaps more importantly EPO, fraudulent, you should explain why and not simply say that a little birdy told you so.
As for the tape itself, God, I have no idea where it is.  What happened is this.  Either Rick Wallace sent me a copy which I kept and David Stirling another which he transcribed or he sent me one which I forwarded to David.  It was a long time ago and I just don't remember. 
What is your relationship with premies, by the way?