I hate to say this so bluntly, but this IP user's lack of effective communication skills and apparent failure to demonstrate a modicum of common sense leaves me the impression that they may not have the skill set necessary to become a productive contributor on Wikipedia. I'll leave them a note on their talk page, but if their unconstructive pattern of editing continues, I wouldn't be opposed to a 36-hr block.   From user Kurtis on the wikipedia incident board. See how ignorant admins are! he/she is judging me on an article's edit. This person will hide his face when he/she knows I can communicate much much better than this guy. Just using words and phrases like modicum , effective etc doesnt make one a PhD of english. A major discovery in exoplanets does make one a PhD in Astrophysics me.  Hey, i am doing this on purpose, so that you are proven so wrong in terms of your judgement! Again, just give a single reason why I should follow your policies, when all of you who have dealing with me have not followed them yourselves? (please dont come and say dont blame on others is a wikipedia policy. it would be hillarious as i know that policy as well! why dont you all look athe mirror first and acknowledge what mistakes you have rather than judging my face first! It is crystal clear to even a baby that the article is full of lies and should have been massively edited for WP:NPOV and WP:Puffery....108.78.177.132