http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130301/debtext/130301-0001.htm

 Hansard not a reliable secondary source 

Over on the David Kelly talk page it says Hansard isn't a reliable Wikipedian source. I am quite frankly puzzled by the reasons given. eg. An editor removed the Hansard quotes as the MP was confused and his (the MPs) opinions don't count, even if he (the MP) is Father of the House - A clear case of opinionating if there ever were one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Kelly_%28weapons_expert%29