::::Here you go again with your condescension. I know what it means. Are you really this out of touch or are you playing a game? It is called a fool's errand for a reason. Do you seriously not understand this? Do you seriously not understand why that is an insult? Again, you have failed to do your job and simply tell Tribal why what she's doing in inappropriate. Instead, you've mistakenly turned this into a behavior issue by lying about me making "threats" and being a "bully". I've done no such things. I explained to Tribal that if she continued putting non-encylopedic, poorly sourced (or unsourced) content into hundreds of articles, it would be reported and she could get blocked. THAT is not making threats or being a bully, in the context you are trying to have others believe. Not even close. If anything, the bully is use for threatening me with bans, when I am trying hard to improve this project by stopping what I'm confident is very inappropriate editing by Tribal (because of the huge number of articles it affects). Yet all you want to focus on is these completely out-of-context behavior claims against me, instead of using your admin knowledge for an important and useful purpose - to educate Tribal on why what she is doing is wrong. Non-encylopedic content, no sourcing or unreliable sourcing, and adding content to leads that are very clearly not lead-worthy. You see what's happening and you are choosing to ignore it instead of saying directly to Tribal what the problems are with what she's doing. 76.189.121.57