I discussed the problem whit the three shown banners whit the Wikipedia live-chat service and they told me to just delete them. I now noticed that you included them again in the article, so I now humbly request to the supremacy of Wizard191 to get rid of these three inaccurate information banners or at least specify the problem in the galling discussion page, as everybody else. If you haven´t read the galling article, how do you know it´s something wrong whit it? I can assure you that everything I put the Wikipedia galling article it is extensively peer-viewed and approved at Karlstad University, Sweden.

  

What is this "live-chat service" that you speak of? I haven't ever heard of one. The proper way to discuss the templates is here on the talk page of the article. All three are applicable because: 1.  the English needs to be improved 2.  you have pretty much taken ownership of the article 3.  the article needs more wikilinks. Hope that explains it.   

Hi dude, Wazz up , why didn´t you include my entire massege? 
It looks very miserable and whining, as it reads above =)

Are you kidding me?, so you don´t have a "Wikipedia live-chat service", strange because I used it, and if that isn´t possible must sombody be realy evil. No suprise to me when the whole world is bullying and abusing people who have no means of fighting back, with the exeption of trying to make it so clear how horrific the discussion, realy can be. And it is to be hoped that somewhone in the crowd of onlookers finally realize the unreasonable and unjust in the many´s bullying against an unknowing victim or potential plaintiff.

Regarding your, , complaints quotation: "you have pretty much taken ownership of the article 3." end quotation, I can only reply that there are several others who make contributions to the galling article and I only make sure it´s scientificly correct with regards to syntax and source. 
Some parts have I watched extra carefully, for example the pictures because I made them and it´s therefore easy for me to correct the content and syntax of the description. 
Other peaople are free to write any knew exiting findings and I will not change anything as long it´s has warranty.
A lot of the text have been changed by others over the years and is still present in the article so don´t blame me for something that clearly isn´t true. 
  

I thought I did include the whole message, other than the greeting. If I missed something else, then feel free to copy it over; it was a mistake if I missed it. After looking through the history of the article it doesn't appear that you've taken ownership of the article. So I'm cool with dropping the COI tag.