"

 Question 

Would you be happy if nobody else contributed to the Spore aticle?  (talk|Contribs) 
No. Other people have contributed. This isn't about contribution.   
I know, but a lot of your posts on the talk page go something like this:
Editor #1: I think the article should say this.
You: No.
Editor #2: I think the article should say that.
You: NO NO NO! [refer to something that supports your view on what the article should say] Period. End of discussion.
Editor #2: But...
You: I don't want to hear it. You're WRONG.
Now granted, not all of your posts are like that, but there are so many that have that kind of tone that I think it's likely to scare away a lot of would-be contributors.  (talk|Contribs) 
It may seem that way now.   
It has seemed like that for a while. You disagree with a majority of people, and it's getting a bit disruptive in my view. Don't claim ownership on the article JAF, others are free to edit it. Your opinion doesn't control it.   
Why don't you check the other articles I created - I don't interfere that much. Spore is just an article that people want to add wrong information to. And it isn't my opinion. I've already backed up what I've said with tons and tons of facts and citations. Things will change when the game comes out, because a lot of the article will disappear (ie. the phases will be clearer instead of what was just based on what was told to us.)   

Head Coach 09
Do you know if it actually is going to be on PC? All I've seen is 360 and PS3 so far.  T/C 
I believe it states so on the official site. Looks like there's no announced Windows version.   
Which would suck, because I'm a PC-only gamer. However, the picture of the case on IGN certainly looks like a PC-style case, and somebody else was saying EA forgot to announce a PC version of a game before. So I'll hold out hope, because it looks to be a good game.  T/C 
Well, there's always Front Office Football, but I like a graphic coat of paint sometimes. Fortunately, I own a 360.   

The removal was intentional, and a comment was left. Thank you. ( )  —Preceding comment was added at  

Series finale

I actually happen not to dislike most of the shows I removed (I very much like several of them). If the ""Fresh Prince"" one is, indeed, somehow ""notable,"" the ""Friends"" one is certainly not: it's just the end of a popular show  as run-of-the-mill as finales get. There's nothing very noteworthy about ""Xena"": the finale's events might be large in the world of the program, but they're not in any way important in the realm of television or media. ""Frasier""'s last episode was great, but, again, why does it deserve any sort of mention? These are just relatively new, popular shows, who're mentioned because they have a fan base; their last episodes really aren't very ""notable"" (unlike, say, those of ""Newhart"" or the show where it turns out the