Easing restriction in baby steps 

OK, I understand your post on my talk page. I have no intention of persisting at making edits pertaining to date linking (notably, the RfC on bot). It was not my intention to be testing the limits. I genuinely thought that “style guides and related discussions” meant MOSNUM and its talk page, where all that drama unfolded.

My point, which I made here on Krill’s talk page, is that I have made many, conflict-free contributions to MOSNUM on issues not related to date linking. It seems the project’s interests in avoiding conflict will be perfectly met by simply restricting me from participation in anything to do with date linking—regardless of where it is on Wikipedia. Period. My other contributions on MOSNUM projects such as the  template. Please note my collaborative work on {{val}}, It was originally called “Delimitnum” and had its functionality described here on Archive 94, and……it was extensively discussed and voted upon a bit lower, also here on Archive 94 on WT:MOSNUM, and……it was well received here on WT:MOS Archive 97 where its functionality tweaked to a compromise that received broad acceptance.I created a main testing sandbox is , which I made for the template writers to use. This is all examples of the kind of work I do when the topic isn't the vitriolic date linking/delinking.