Eternity clause 

You are right about the referenced article is about not chaning the fundamental principles of democracy. And this is why I have a BIG problem with Lone boatman. He does not want the word "democracy". He then took revenge by changing the entire article into a catch all (international page in which he redefines 'eternity clause' as a "term" used internationally instead of the colloquial description specific to Article 79 paragraph (3) of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. He added the additional data at the top of the page only in an act of revenge and to cover up the 'eternity clause' article. And again he focused on the word "constition" at the top of his changes. And when I told him he had wrongfully duplicated the "entrenched clause" and again was wrongfully pushing the word "constitution" (which Germany does not have), he then added "Basic Law" to his change. Then several editors suddently (for the first time) showed up and one of them deleted the entire 'eternity clause' article, leaving only what Lone boatman had put in. Wikipedia is apparently no place to safeguard an article, even a properly referenced article, which it was. And it was not a personal essay on a statue, but a very important contribution regarding democracy in Germany based on the law.