R - the only one who seems to be engaged in any kind of whitewash\POV forcing here, is you. Personally, I just want the truth, and if that means staring again from the title, 0k.::::  

 As someone who, myself, removed the section previously, in the hopes that doing so would help lower the temperature of discussion here, and help editors come to consensus, I have no objection at all to your edit. But I want to quibble with something in your comment here. You are wrong that there is actually any sort of consensus about that section. For either "side" to unilaterally declare consensus for their preferred outcome is the wrong way to start the three-part discussion for which you call. But I support your call for that discussion!