Julien, there always exist contrary points of view. People still take issue with the Earth being round. But while one can have a contrary opinion, that doesn't make said opinion a fact. 

Gaywebmonkey has cited its sources  an interview with Corrigan, published comments by Cobra's attorney's, email correspondence between Corrigan and an unnamed producer, and statements by various anti-child porn groups.  The issue isn't those sources. It's the fact that you haven't provided one source for anything you've contributed to the article. 

I've changed your "claiming" comments  to "stating." "Claiming" is far less neutral than "stating." You are arguing the article was biased. I was rectifying that situation. None of which prohibits another party with knowledge of the issues in question from stating the opposite  as Cobra's attorneys have done.  But just changing "stated" to "claims" doesn't make something "more" neutral.

Lastly, the reason why citation is so important here is to allow anyone else to backtrack and read for themselves about the issues in question. It brings a measure more of impartiality to the proceedings. The rules here are the same for you as they are for me: cite your sources.