Hi! Have as look at the definition of "colonizers" from the Free Online Dictionary:http://www.thefreedictionary.com/colonizer
"col·o·nize (kl-nz)
v. col·o·nized, col·o·niz·ing, col·o·niz·es 
v.tr.
1. To form or establish a colony or colonies in.
2. To migrate to and settle in; occupy as a colony.
3. To resettle or confine (persons) in or as if in a colony.
4. To subjugate (a population) to or as if to a colonial government.
v.intr.
1. To form or establish a colony.
2. To settle in a colony or colonies.



colo·nizer n."
Of course, there is nothing objectionable if you are to interpret them in the first three ways. I don't understand how it contitutes WP:NPOV. Nevetheless, how does a single word affect the neutrality of a whole article. As for your other accusations, I have given you my reply in the talk page of the article. Your accusations that I am indulging in "mischief" and that I am "ignorant" etc. give wrong signals. Also see WP:CIVIL. Regards -My coffee shop