You're an idiot per usual, but I'll oblige. 

http://www.marinij.com/marin/ci_6527722
http://cbs5.com/localwire/localfsnews/bcn/2007/08/02/n/HeadlineNews/PORN-ARREST/resources_bcn_html

It's SO HARD to google, right? Anyways, I totally don't see why arrests of pedophile activists stemming from the activities of an anti-pedophile activism website would be covered in this article. It makes completely no sense that an article regarding anti-pedophile activism would cover the activities of anti-pedophile activists. No, all that information should be removed and more should be added to the criticism section! Yay!  

Oh, and before anyone beats me to it... "Wah wah, don't be mean!"