In looking at the article again, I'd like to delete the third paragraph of the Federal prison section.  All the detail about his appeal (including the dissenting opinion) really gives the section more heft than it deserves.  I understand using the online decision as a source document to get some detail about his conviction, but the detailed summary of that document is out-of-place in an article about a man who is notable as a musician and producer.  That would leave the first paragraph about the case (with one new sentence about the appeal?), the second paragraph about the incident, and the line about his "federal sabbatical."  Any other opinions?