When I discussed with User:MarkSweep on a private IRC session about any post made between 12:35 and 16:52, he pointed the following out to me:

(partial chat exerpt from the other day)

mark_sweep you posted on markalexander's talk page at 13:40 UTC
mark_sweep then at 13:42 UTC you posted to the reference desk:
mark_sweep http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff;=prev&oldid;=39874588
Shultzii Those posts you just pointed out- they're troll posts? (I don't see how they are.)
Shultzii They look pretty innocent to me
mark_sweep that's what makes them troll posts
Shultzii Making a wikilink and pointing it out? *scratches head*
Shultzii I'll take a 2nd look at his talk page...
mark_sweep the original question may look innocent, but it was pretty pointless; that's why people consider it trolling
mark_sweep here's the thing
Shultzii Oh about the thought of naming a new city of Hoeryong somewhere in the US?
mark_sweep yes, but it's not even that
mark_sweep here's the thing
Shultzii Go ahead. Taking food out of microwave.
mark_sweep an admin asks you to stop
mark_sweep more or less accusing you of being a troll
mark_sweep you continue with the same thing you were doing
mark_sweep which only confirms his suspicion

All I was doing was disambiguating what someone was thinking. They misconstrued "Hoeryong" as a Dutch phrase (meaning "Child of a w"). In the ref desk entry from the beginning, I meant what if I named a new town after a Korean city? Therefore, I had to tell User:DirkvdM that "Hoeryong" in the way it was intended would be named after a Korean city, not a Dutch phrase. Not once did it ever even cross my mind that this was a continuation of a trollish act. MarkAlexander misconstrued it as such, so can someone please lift the block early?