"

 I DID NOT REMOVE ANY WARNINGS. YOU ARE THE ONE DOING THAT, VIOLATING WIKIPEDIA POLICY 

The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST  for harassing user's about this page

It seems that many users have had problems with  harassment and vandalism

, why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ""vandalism"" or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users.

Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have  who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?”

 describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ""vandalism"" in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ""police state"" don't even pass the straight face test.”

 even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior.

Dear Administrators:""I would like to file a complaint against user ""nescio"" for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ""Police State"". User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples "" Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet"" and ""Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional"", as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail.Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. Sincerely yours,User Winston Smith describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.”

 had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on  talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings.  has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet  refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war.      is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page  while falsely accusing me of stalking  and sock puppetry.      I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing.  

Please explain what makes you think that  is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet?  

 I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was.  

So VinnyCee is not'' a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you ""check"" into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are.  

It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against [[WP:NP