Reply Dear you are right in your argument.

The User   Walkie-talkie is coming out with some crasy arguments that there is nothing even to discuss about the "Terrorist category". I don’t know whether he is thinking Wikipedia should be monopolized by the fascist Sri Lankan killers who are some or other way marginalizing the Tamils in Sri Lanka since the independence. He is talking about commonsense. I don’t think so even he has an iota of that.

If Anton Balasingham could be named as the chief strategist and the chief negotiator or the apologist of one of the most barbaric terrorist groups, what about the following atrocities against Sri Lankan Tamils since the independence by the Sri Lankan State. 

          Genocide '83

        TABDisappearances & Extra Judicial Killings
       TABRape & Murder of Eelam Tamil Women
        TABTorture of Eelam Tamils

       TABWar Crimes: Sri Lanka - the Record Speaks....

       Media & the Tamil Struggle Selective Reporting, Disinformation & Murder of Journalists

TABSRI LANKA ACCUSED AT UNITED NATIONS

State Terrorism in Sri Lanka

If you go through the above incidents you will come to know they are many times worse than the highest number of suicide attacks which were targeted against innocent civilians by the LTTE.

I couldn’t understand what is the importance of that banning in 20 countries when hardly most of the countries civilians had not been killed by the LTTE attacks and the LTTE's activities are expanded into those countries only to the extent of fund raising from the expatriate Tamils.

He was the political adviser not the adviser to LTTE leader to carry out suicide attacks or to scheme military activities.

Composing the LTTE leader's annual speech or representing LTTE doesn’t qualify him for the "Terrorist Tag" at all.

Why the talks failed every time was mainly the hardliners in the South and not by any of the Tamil groups or LTTE.

It is so stupid expecting he definitely knows all the crimes being carried out by the LTTE when he was utilised by the LTTE only at theoretical level and for negotiations.

I don’t know why that particular wikipedian feels sorry for him. For what?
Here anyone can comment independently and dragging a wikipedian to discuss with some other wikipedians is not acceptable. Then he can come out with his opinions here.
Others are also expert in the Sri Lankan Conflict here.