Your rules are not to be enforced according to a draconian, egregious methodology 
that violates the free dissemination of greater knowledge and truth.  By citing the 
3-revert rule, that's exactly what you are doing.  If you do, then this militates 
against intellectual liberty, and the exposure of factual information regarding 
human rights abuses, which involve the entire international community.
 
This kind of fascism cannot be tolerated.  And incontroveribly, it does not represent the Wikipedia ethic.  
If you have changed your values in favor of fascism, human rights abuses, and political correctness,
then you are not educating the global community, but rather dumbing down
the masses as transistorized automatons. 
 
Once again, the name Rama's Arrow represents Hindu miltancy, and this must
be construed as a personal attack against millions who are not Hindus.  I think
this is the kind of personal attack that should be most concerning to you, and
Wikipedia must address this effectively.

As a result, it would not be "inappropriate," as you worded it, to summarily
remove this block.