Yup, I've read the article though, gone on a long walk, come back and read it again. The tags are still inappropriate. This is a robust and well-cited article. A mass of general complaints at the top of the article are simply not helpful. A more useful approach would be to individually tag specific facts that are question, specific sections that need cleanup, specific claims that may be OR, and specific places where tone is a problem, using inline tags. Again, if there is no response, I will remove the tags shortly.