The sentence was added back by   with no effort to clarify the questions above. The edit summary merely said:
" The facts are very very clear. Please contact mitchel_francis@horacemann.org, the Faculty Advisor, to confirm the fact that Horace Mann won the listed awards. Please stop removing factual info" 
No the facts are not clear at all. It is silly to suggest we contact someone to verify.  that misses the whole point of wikipedia.  If this is the only way to verify then it is not notable enough to be in the encylopedia. By the way there are no awards listed, only a vague mention of numerous awards. Facts that cannot be verified are not suitable for inclusion in an encylopedia. Some facts thats can be verfied may still not be suitable for the encylopedia if they are not notable. These "numerous" awards could well be in the latter category too.  User:140.247.156.10, if you want them to be included then make a case.  As it stands you have no case.  (Talk)