Jdorney really needs to grow up here. 

First off Jdorney, I keep it up, because you are ingnoring facts which I have continually provided proof for. I have submitted to you, the site, sources, page numbers, and even posted the actual articles in which these facts are stated.

Either you don't bother to read them, or you read them but ignore them because you are so biased in your beliefs that you only include facts that support them, and in some cases you lie altogether. How in god's name you are allowed to continue to be a Wikipedia editor is beyond me.

You basically quote two sources in the PIRA article...CAIN research, and Lost Lives. CAIN research is a "estimated" source of information. Jane's Intelligence, the US State Dept, and the Council On Foreign Relations...all use official statistics for their information, they do not "estimate" casualties as CAIN does.

As for Lost Lives...I have the latest edition of that book, and if you go through it page by page, you come up with the Loyalist casualty figures and British Security Service figures, i have put in the article. Either you are not really reading the book, or your are just lying about the figures, because you know they don't support your beliefs.

You also misquote other books. For instance "The Irish War" staates that 46 Loyalist Paramilitaries were killed by the IRA between 1986-1997...you state in your article that this is the TOTAL number of Loyalists killed by the IRA, that isn't true. The IRA killed a further 38 Loyalists between 1974-1986, but of course you leave that part out. I don't know if you are some Loyalist sympathizer or what, but the way in which you continually ignore the facts about how many UDA and UVF members were killed by the IRA seems odd to me. I have given SEVERAL different sources for this number. Books like "The Irish War" or the latest edition of "The IRA A History" by Tim Pat Coogan. Jane's Intelligence, the US State dept. "Patterns Of Global Terrorisim" and the Center For Strategic and international studies. Why these highly regarded sources aren't enough for you, I am not sure...unless you are trying to push an agenda.

All of the above sources agree on the number and breakdown of the British Security service people killed bu the IRA over the 30 year war. As a former US Marine, with experience in Counter-terrorisim issues, I pride myself on using the above sources, which were the same sources we used in our Force Recon, counter-terrorisim classes. And by the way, the IRA was one of the main groups we studied, along with groups like Hezbollah, Al Qaida and the Tamil tigers. These groups are known as the "big four" to the US Military.

If the above sources were good enough for the Marine Corps...they are good enough for Wikipedia. You need to grow up, and stop deleting facts just because they don't support your own, sad, bias views.

I will file another complaint with Wikipedia about you, and I will continue to edit this article to ensure that it is professional and not the work of some biased little editor, who is more interested in pushing his own views then he is in the facts.