Yes I am flexible but I have no idea what a GAN is.  It is a surprise to me that I need you to check my edits before they can be crossed off the list.  When I made comments such as "how's this?", I was not speaking to you.  I thought I was speaking to other editors.  Perhaps it would help to improve Wikipedia relationships if you would point editors to a wiki page that explains the process you are using.  I realize that I am coming across as a little peeved and that's because I am.  It does not seem reasonable to me that you should use the talk page for your personal score sheet. In my years of editing Wikipedia I have thought of myself as being on an equal playing field with other editors and have recently had to deal with the fact that Wikipedia allows paid employees of government agencies to edit articles (see talk page Clothianidin. That experience has left a bitter taste in my mouth.

 Since many of my interests/edits are related to "underdog" issues, this has resulted in my fear of seeing "experts" taking over our encyclopedia.  My area of experience/expertise is in the medical field and I have seen it happen to Wiki medical articles.  So yes, my hackles do raise at times.  Clearly you are interested in improving Warren's article-but is it possible that a sheep in wolf's clothing reviewer could "improve" it as well?