Biberian's 2007 secondary source is also misrepresented by the article ==
If statements in individual sources require that the introduction says cold fusion researchers are "a small community" and that "mainstream scientists" perceive the field as the remains of controversy, without specific quantification or any of the abundant opposing points of view, then why aren't we required to report the conclusions of Biberian 2007 which says, "proof that nuclear reactions not predicted by current theories occur ... has been established"?   
Primarily WP:UNDUE. The "proof" has no support in mainstream sources.   

==