Ivan Štambuk claimed that I vandalized what  wrote on the "personal uion"?! and then Rjencia says here's another disruptive account
Could please take a look of this dude's writings? He is inserting some severe Magyar gibberish into the history section of the Croatia article you wrote. Many thanks   

Thanks for information. We are having vandal which is trying to start edit war between hungarian and croatian users. Maybe I am making mistake but earlier user name has been user:Toroko. Our contact with hungarian users about this question is user:Hobartimus.Rjecina (talk) '''
edit war? vandal? It is You who are deleting everything!
Then I get accused of being some random people? or socketpuppets or even Torokko, who also didn't understand what was going on here?We are having new-old Hungary-Croatia problem. Newly created disruptive account is called user:Bizso. Can you please talk with user and if nothing else discover his knowledge of hungarian language so that we can know if this is Toroko or somebody else ? Rjecina (talk) ''
I am disruptive because I do not hide some facts that you don't feel good about?
What is this? We agree on how we present history so that everybody is happy? Is this what this is all about? Excuse me for being so outraged by it should be the other way around! I see this bullshit that Union with Hungary ended in 1526. Then Croatia was a totally autonomous part of Austria-Hungary. Then Croatia was in union with Hungary 1102-1526 and then in union with Austria 1526-1918. Also, Kingdom of Hungary and the Lands of St. Stephen were different states.
When I tag them for , it gets removed without listing any sources. I am open to alternate explanations. But these are not academic viewpoints. They're biased assertions with no refernce!
If I provide reference for the contrary it gets deleted.
If I provide reference for the other academic viewpoint in a disputed statement, then it gets deleted. 
Though, interestingly enough the other references that support the other viewpoint are not deleted. They remain there!? Is this what you guys think about writing an Encyclopedia? I know that the sources I provided didn't confirm the view that Croatia was an idependent state. But that's why I added them to list them beside the sources that say it was in personal union. So that each viewpoint is represented. Who decides to remove one side of the story and then calim that the other user is a vandal? Then I am immediatly tagged for being someone else, and threatened to be blocked. This is a joke!