Of course Mr Shankbone did revert edits, significantly more than 4 times in 24 hours too!  The biggest difference is that each time I was trying to find something that would survive, but he went directly back to the same thing.  

And while it is true that everyone thinks their version is correct...  you will notice that I do not have a history of being concerned about that.  You will also notice that in fact the false statement that I removed conflicts with a sourced statement earlier in the article, and conflicts with the reference provided for the last sentence for that item.  Wikipedia has a richly deserved reputation as a source of inaccurate information because of exactly that type of entry!

The statement was that it is dark in Barrow for "a month or so" in winter.  In fact it is more that twice that long (67 days), and that is an easy to verify fact  See the references provided in the article. You can also check the edit history and find that at one time the article itself was not quite correct, and that I provided the correct facts and the reference.

I would also suggest that you read the discussion page for that article, as back in October others wanted it deleted, and I am the one who suggested waiting for awhile.  But I did then say that it eventually should be removed for the reasons the other person complained about.

Whatever, tomorrow is another day.  If you have no integrity and want to bully your way to victory, so be it.  I'm not going to stoop to quite that level.  But trust me that in the long run I think that article will be corrected.