At least my edit has the virtue of being accurate, instead of your description of Bondeson as a "historian" which was 100 percent inaccurate. Was that not "original research?"  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nazi_talking_dogs&oldid;=431078201. When you complained to another editor that Bondeson should be described as a historian, the other editor seemed to be of the opinion that this gentleman is far from being qualified as a source on such matters (here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIridescent&action;=historysubmit&diff;=431204290&oldid;=431203015).