Consensus is not, in fact, with you with respect to your (mis-)characterization of the source here, as evidenced by the quite clear consensus here about how this sort of citation should be characterized.   Is there a reason why you decline to answer my question above, which is just why you believe Ukraine did not say this and/or why it is not notable?  If you concede that a Ukrainian agency or ministry did say this and that it's notable then just what is the point of this back and forth?