If i start deleting the unrelated stuff, will you claim i am a baseless vandal?
Which of the PD proposals did the EP actually adopt directly from the PD? The new suggestion for the name of Black Ribbon Day? Which is not even consistently used by the states that adopted it at national level? Those states are in a minority anyway, a fact you have made every effort to exclude from the page. Can we (carefully and unemotionally and unweasely) mention that several proposals have gone nowhere and one has been rejected? or is that just an "opinion"?
Many things are "related to the Prague Process" but that doesn't mean they should be on the Prague Declaration page, particularly while the "so-called Prague Process" is rarely so-called and doesn't represent a coherent body of action by an identifiable body.
I am glad you agree that the term "Prague Process" is very rarely used. And it seems to be used in inverted commas.
Thankyou for the Meike Wulf paper. Notable was his assessment of mythmaking in the Ukraine which parallels Lithuania exactly: "...the process of national mythmaking after 1991 needed to screen out crimes against humanity, fascist activism, and local collaboration in the Holocaust committed by these very "resistance fighters"". That supports Katz and Zuroff, doesn't it?