Look Kevin, Trouton was a very smart physicist and a fantastic experimentalist, if he for a second anticipated that his calculations would give a null result do you think that he would have devised and undertaken the experiment? His calculations anticipated a non-null result and this is what I am showing in my two page recreation. So don't give me this shit about the calculations being wrong. They are wrong the same exact way Trouton was wrong. They have to be in order to recreate his thinking. This is a paper about the history of a famous experiment, it is not a modern day analysis. 

You are simply showing your lack of respect and knowledge about the history of physics (see your blunders about the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction, have you read the papers I recommended?)

So, using the SAME constraints and knowledge as descrbed in Trouton's paper (or in mine), show us how you get a null result.
I'll tell you: you can't. Because he didn't. Neithe did Tomascheck in 1924,24,26,27. Show some respect, these were smart people, they knew what they were doing. You are still thinking current day SR, you can't step out of your little box. I challenged you for 2 days now. Show us your calculations. We have been waiting.