I have never exchanged dialogue with the primary contributor of "Ohio Media Watch", but I'm pretty sure I know who that person is based on information I've found online.  If I'm right, this person has reported on him/herself more than once without disclosing his/her identity, a blatant conflict of interest in regards to reliability.  It is unfortunate that we cannot use "Ohio Media Watch" on Wikipedia; however, if that blog's primary contributor is "getting the shaft", blame the primary contributor.  One other thing to consider: the primary contributor at ohiomediawatch.wordpress.com has cited Wikipedia at least fifteen times, going as far back as March 2006, and as recently as January of this year.  We do not know what, if anything, the primary contributor has edited on Wikipedia — another problematic observation when weighing the reliability of "Ohio Media Watch" (again, reliability as defined by Wikipedia).  ''' (talk''')