The compromise is between 24,000 characters worth of back and forth for a theory with no real acceptance, versus nothing.  I've spent a lot of time tracking down the sources for those 24,000 characters, all with not a whit of change from the scientific community on the topic.  That's what I want to avoid, having to find yet another source that points out some minor detail of the elephant's kidney does not mean hominins were once aquatic.  Do you think it's an adequate compromise?  If not, would you suggest replacing the list wholesale?   (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex