How telling of WP processes that all the reviews I cite of the discussed effect are ignored by the above commentators, while they seek to justify themselves by freely imagining rebuttals of the cited evidence. What a farce these juveniles make of Wikipedia. Yet I happily leave to their juvenile arguments their blind-sighted conclusion. Why? Because if the readers of WP are of the same stock as these juvnile editors, then the information I have offered is evidently too complex for them to rationally consider. Also, my short foray into WP editing has evidenced that WP is no place to offer psychological knowledge that does not stick, prima facie,  to Newtonian physics; here, psychological knowledge must stick to the classical world like peanut butter does to bread. Let us leave these juvenile retarders of scientifically appraised and communicated findings another decade of their Punch-and-Judy approach to public communication of scientific knowledge. Science will progress, as always, without the contribution of such self-appointed protectors of self-obvious truths, and such puppets of the mythical fundamentals of human knowledge. Rodgarton