Ah, so you asked me to simply give up and let you have your way, but you did so politely.  I am not trying to get a point into the article.  You are making a completely unsupported claim, and I am trying to remove it.  By claiming that I am trying to get a point in, when the situation is the opposite, you are misrepresenting the situation.  I have already addressed your points on the talk page, and it's rather arrogant for you to declare that I haven't.  It's also rather rude to say "I've already addressed this issue; see my response to others".