I'm not sure and will think about it. , I'm doubt anything could be written about the SNPU that we couldn't fit into the Svoboda article, and so I tend to agree with you. ', I would also argue that many (not all) of the 2004 changes were superficial: multiple academic sources describe these as "cosmetic" and intended to improve the party's image, but not its underlying ideology. I'm guessing you'd disagree with this.

Nevertheless, we might all agree that far-right politics are in flux right now in Ukraine, and I wouldn't be surprised if many go the most far-right elements around Svoboda are now attracted to Right Sector. ', isn't it true that the Social-National Assembly and Patriots of Ukraine were originally groups that came from the transformation of the SNPU into Svoboda? Now these groups helped form Right Sector.

I think the Svoboda article could be improved by writing about all of this, and incorporating the SNPU material as well. It'll be easier a year from now when more academic material has been written about the current situation in Ukraine. -