The reason another admin stated for my last block (that Dicklyon brought upon me last weekend, for 48 hrs), was also edit war. However, it was only me who got blocked that time. In my complaint I requested that BOTH parties be punished because a war involves two or more parties, but my request for DENIED. Now you are saying I got a 24 hrs block because a war takes two parties? How ridiculous is this! As far as other 24 hrs are concerned, where did I insult Dicklyon personally? I talked about his worthless edits, not him, and I have all right to talk about his edits because it was the page I wrote that has been featured on WP main page; he is just a trouble maker – see his Talk page to see how many enemies he has created, besides a few personal buddies of his like SamBlacketer who lies on your Talk page about "many editors" who have blocked me (it was Dicklyon actually) and calls my WP featured article a fringe theory  how can he tell if he admits having no clue about the article topic in the first place?  As far as the dispute resolve, all my reasons are stated right on the article Discussion so I am not hiding anything. People can say what they think of Dicklyon's misuse of WP regulations on the article Talk page directly. So far no one would do it. I guess the infamous "many editors" include one or two close buddies of Dicklyon tops.