October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for posting a message on my talk page. The comment I made was not in regard to the content of your edits or your sense of persecution. At the moment in question, you had appeared to have made four successive reversions of the Spain article. I posted a message on your talk page to draw your attention to WP:3RR. The wording of the message is from a standard template. I posted the message to draw your attention to the rule. It was a warning, and if you had reverted the article again while I was still logged on, I would have blocked you for 24h: I'm glad that I didn't have to. This is in complete accord with WP policy. My stance does not reflect any viewpoint on the content of your edits: 3RR is there to stop an article being filled with angry reverts. You should be careful not to get angry as you edit WP, and to remain civil. Otherwise, it becomes far too easy fo things to get out of control. Ecemaml has posted a remark further down the page, and I shall inform them that you feel persecuted, and suggest that they don't go looking for a fight. If you have real concerns about an article or another user, you might try WP:RFC.  10:38, 31