I was busy adding to the article when you chose to interfere - perhaps I should have placed an (in use) tag to avoid that. The images are informative and if you spend a minute or so verifying it, you'll find that they ARE images of Guinusia chabrus = Plagusia chabrus. They obviously ARE an expansion even if they do not meet with your expectations, and have not been 'plastered' as you so snidely observe. That you personally find them unacceptable grieves me greatly. I would remind you of the ownership caveat that exists on WP.