I still feel that the Adolescence article is fine in its definition of what an adolescent is, since as I stated before, adolescence doesn't just end when a person turns age 18 or age 19. Also, yes, I consider a 13-year-old a child. If you read the Child article, which I added to a week ago, you will see how the definition of Child is also defined. And, you did get a grin out of me when you just now stated that that "a 14 year old has more similarities to a 5 year old then we do to a 40 year old mainly because we are also immature in ways"...even though I don't necessarily agree, and I don't feel that watching cartoons or any animations necessarily means immaturity. Hey, I watch Death Note. Okay, yeah, Death Note is a mature animation, but you get my point...and I get yours. I'm basically stating that a 17-year-old, for instance, in reality, is not a child...as a 7-year-old is. Yes, older people sometimes call a 17-year-old a child, but a 17-year-old is not a child. Also, when I think of adolescents, I don't usually think of 13-year-olds and 14-year-olds, though I know that they are (usually) adolescents, so...again...I get your point in calling those ages children. All in all, you are what a I believe to be a rarity; most 17-year-olds would not want to be call a children. I know I didn't. And you are one year (or is it more so months for you?) from being age 18? I'm 25, but still get mistaken for a late adolescent sometimes, and I'm not sure if it annoys or makes me me feel good that maybe when I'm 30, I can still pass for age 19.