POV tag added
Throughout this article there is an overreliance on the organisation's own claims together with a lack of neutral sources. Claims are stated as if they are automatically true rather than just being statements made by the organization. The lead is especially flawed in this aspect. The whole ordering of the article, with its subsection headings, is also suspect - it reads like an advertorial. Important information is missing. There is a complete absence of any detail about who finances the organization, a crucial absence given that this might reveal more of the organisation's aims. For the same reason financing info should be near the top of the article, not at its very bottom.