David Horvitz 

Your edit created a grammatical problem.  Thank you for correcting the part about 'the Wikipedia adminstration'.  I think this makes it pretty clear that the majority of the editors thought the images were of poor quality (not you, I am sure).  On the reason for the deletion this refers.  The reason isn't very clear.  Was it a presumed copyright violation?  Or a spamming campaign, as your own comment suggested?  Or using Commons as an art gallery?  If the latter, is it only permissible to use Commons for unartistic images?  By the way, I have nothing to do with Horvitz, never met him nor communicated with him, but I admire his work.  Can we continue discussion on the article talk page? I am turning in for tonight. PS from the photo on your user page, you live quite close to where some of this took place!