Edits to this page 

I noticed that very recently a lot of well-referenced information has been deleted from this article's page. I am wondering what readers might think about restoring some of those deletions - as they provide "everyday" contexts, analogies, semantics, examples, etc. that help to better explain the content of the article to a general readership - as the deletions that were made might limit the use of the article to experts in the field? Also, the deletions remove the psychology/social-science aspect of the article. Would anyone be adverse to restoring some of the deleted content?