Proposed Controversy Section

1, I requested administrator assistance because of user mongo's unrelenting deletion of anything I post, including a NPOV Template at the top of the article...he removed it within minutes...the template states it should not be removed until the issues are discussed and resolved.
2, I'm simply proposing a Controversy Section, or any separate section, with the following.
Outside Magazine revealed Kellogg used the "powerful steroid dexamethasone" for an Everest speedclimb attempt.http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/Climbings-Little-Helper.html
The above 'powerful steroid dexamethasone' is in the subtitle of the article, and the paragraph on Kellogg is about 30 paragraphs from the top.
3, I'm open to different wording.
4, Mongo objected to this with various personal objections about the climber.  Mongo did not propose other wording, or any other alternative.  Instead he deleted it within minutes, and did not suggest discussing it, nor would tolerate any discussion.  Isn't this a violation of wikipedia conduct?
5, Fact:  National media Outside Magazine did an article on the matter, it's a critical article, and the journalist did a paragraph on Kellogg's use of the prescription drug on Everest.
I will try to find other mention of Kellogg's use of the drug...there is mention of it at his sponsor's blog Outdoor Research.
6, Administrator, could you inquire into whether other moderators etc are joining together to control the information in the article?
7, Could you ask for a third party to take part?