Pschemp, Wikipedia's responsible for this libel, both here and in the discussion about it.  I don't see what I want about it either.  How a self-claimed, previously threatening, 18-year-old senior in high school can block a 42 y/o CEO of a fellow 501(c)(3) who's completed a graduate-level class in generative syntax (linguistics) and done a lot of work on an "article" is beyond me.   even has a run-on sentence on his user page and very poor spelling all over the place, including there.  Whereas I got "As" and "Bs" in all 4-year-college English requirements for graduation with a 4-year degree, I have to get "bullied" here to share ideas by someone with much less education and authority, not to mention get falsely accused of things.  My work brought the article up to a "Start-Class" on the Wikipedia quality scale, and I'm the only one arguing who even claims to be a member of the Military history WikiProject, let alone a candidate for coordinator there.

I do feel defensive, and granted, Military history WikiProject coordinator would still not provide me with any executive powers.  However, it provides another reason for administrators to not want to block my account like they have, making false accusations, not even providing a warning, overstepping their authority, bullying.  It appears to be one of the many flaws on Wikipedia, flaws whose effects need much better mitigation or repair.  Hopefully, we'll manage it well, but we aren't right now; that's for sure!