, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually, it is unquestionagbly mocking when someone comments about your being blocked, knowing that you cannot respond to them. Especially from an administrator. Why was ANY comment even necessary once I was already blocked, especially from the involved editor/admin who asked you to do it? I never said or even implied that everyone else was at fault; I apologized multiple times for sounding too harsh with the editor who's been adding the questionable content. Beyond that, my primary goal was to get this massive problem solved; massive because of how many articles are involved. I am in no way alone in my feelings on this issue. The large number of editors who have reverted the editor over the past four years is clear evidence of the objections. And now, Dennis is finally acknowledging that I am right on the content issue. He could have, and should have, just said that from the beginning so the other editor would hear it from someone who is very experienced about what is and isn't appropriate. Then we could've proceeded in an appropriate manner to "fix" the problem in the many articles involved. This is why I wrote to admin Mark Arsten in the first place. 76.189.121.57  15:34