As you kinow it yourself you are not elligible nor credible nor a reliable source of neutrality in this case as you are yourself a mormon and all you do is to support other mormons, without following any wikipedias rules, but your own churchs solidarity.
I dont believe that any of you has even the intention of being straightfo9rward with non mormon or to be a little bit honest, but that the alone thing that activate you is your own religious believe and the pedantisme to think that all you may say or do is auto righteous in the name of the church and all the illusions you dream of with open eyes.
I dont want a mormon admi I dont want a mmormon admi I dont want a mormon admi to look into this case but an exterm¨n al one with no relations nor conacts what so ever with this church nor its representants or members.
If you cant do that, must be because your circle of admi friends is around the church, or because you know very deeply that all you did was deeply unappropriate and wont stand a micro mile in a wiki trail.

I am mad, very mad at you, also because you ignore what I have say, so why should I care about your saying and doing if we have to be neutraly equal?
Any idea?
I want the text who was deleeted from the archive, it is unacceptable that a text is deleeted from archive and from the edit history, just one hour after it was reverted and less than a day after it was written, without any previous warning of any kind about it.
This is all about wiki rules and you have broken them all.