Thanks, Tim. I think that the only thing we can do with a persistently "sub-disruptive editor" (hey, look, I coined a phrase) without a major shift in wikipolicy is for each of us to keep on top of him, patiently and kindly nudging him in the right direction, and calling in others when our patience wears thin. If his collaborative skills improve in time, fantastic, if he persists in his behavior, however, then we'll be in a better position to reconsider our approach. Unless anybody has any better ideas? – Soul