If what you say is true, then why did you not put a link to this supposed news article then? I edit for myself and the overall betterment of Wikipedia only. Lee just happens to be one of the articles I monitor for inaccuracies. Contributions to this article, as with any Wikipedia article, are acceptable as long as you are making claims that can be proven. If Paul Conn is under investigation by the IRS then undoubtedly there would be some form of proof, some where on the internet you could link to the article. Even if he was under investigation, that information would be something that should be primarily placed on the Paul Conn article, and not Lee's.