It looks like the Miller book cite was only used once on a minor phrase. While I don't think the book can add much substance to the article since it lacks many sources, it's helpful to keep as an "easy-reading" bio for a lot of readers.  At the other end of the spectrum are books like Holmes, much of which reads like Sigmund Freud, and is equally unsuitable for the article, IMO. Thanks for the clean-up, BTW.