"

DYK nomination of Saguache Crescent
 Hello! Your submission of Saguache Crescent at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!    

 Stop removing content from Joey Sturgis 

There is no official credible source for album credits. Taking images or scans from cd liner notes is illegal. There is no national database because distributors are private companies that aren't required to disclose album details.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.114.24.75   

If there is no published source to back up the fact then the fact does not belong in the biography. See WP:No original research. Wikipedia says it is not enough that your text is true or correct, it must also be previously published.
You can WP:Cite album liner notes even if you don't scan them.   

You must have missed the fact that the first reference is a link to all the credits -> http://www.allmusic.com/artist/joey-sturgis-mn0000938432  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.114.24.75   

That's a great source. Thanks for the link.   

 GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive 

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of   

 Ramped up 

Binksternet, the activity at Snowden has ramped up to the point that I think some action is needed. It is a battlefield where even the simplest work is being disrupted. The long standing Lede is being used to retell the story, and a team has formed. No amount of sense from other editors seems to bring about more sensible editing behaviour nor good communication on the talk page. The talk page is all we've got, if that doesn't work, is there some sort of RfC, or...? Thanks again,  tc 

I will look at what's going on. I've been preoccupied with another biography.   

But you have enough time to keep templating my user Talk page with ""an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period... Please consider using the article's talk page...""?  Let's leave aside the fact I am obviously aware of this advice such that the only remaining explanation is that you are trolling me.  Let's also leave aside the fact that you templated me the minute JohnValeron removed what I added and then Petrarchan stepped in to restore exactly what I added down to the last punctuation point (how does it help Petrarchan if when I add material she wants you template ME instead of the guy she's warring with?)  For a user to have performed four reverts within 24 hours, he or she would have had to have edited FOUR times, no?  I've edited TWICE in 24 hours (note that policy counts ""...edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user..."" as a single edit for counting purposes).  And in these two edits, there is nothing at all in common between these two edits, either in terms of including something or excluding something.  In other words, in no sense have I returned even just twice to some preferred version.  If you are going to say that