Your last edit, the reversion 

…was not about any previously discussed subject, and should not have been contentious. It simply (1) combined sections in different parts of the article that were about the same fundamental subject (physical properties), (2) corrected errors made by Alchemist when he introduced prose about his discharge tube, and (3) made touch-up corrections to the MO diagram section.

You reverted these, gutting (destroying) an hour of careful work. The Edit summary indicates a personal attack—that you reverted without consideration of the merit, instead simply did so because it was my (Le Prof's) edit.

I am putting my prose back in. If you wish to change particular parts of items 1-3 above, feel free to revert, but do the reverts one at a time, and explain for each what the WP-acceptable issue is with the edit. It is not acceptable to simply reject an edit because it is from me.

If you do so again, I will take this to administrators.

Le Prof  71.239.87.100  
Fair enough (except for the "personal attack" allusion). This does not preclude future improvements in the article. -  
If you want me to revert my edit, please say so (here). Otherwise, I won't touch the page for days, to prevent mixups and edit conflicts. -