Why does having an explanation for why the discrepancy occurs, not make it a controversy? If it truly wasn't a controversy, then after Moynihan had made the statement, nothing more would have happened would it? If he had come out and said, 'well, we're doing quite well aren't we?', that would not have sparked the debate and comment that this statement did. There's an explanation for the budget cuts if you believe the government, but I hope you're not going to claim that because that exists, there's been no controversy over those, surely? It is controversial precisely because there is an explanation for it that boils down to a difference between the public and private school system. It was hardly going to be down to anything else, was it?