Reminder: Need consensus to reword
There have been some recent changes, in rewording text, so this is a reminder to seek consensus before attempting to re-write the article text. There are numerous issues to heed:
 The verdict was given by a "panel of 8 judges" because the term "jury" might be misleading to readers.
 Other people are named with last initial to protect privacy, even though fully-named elsewhere, per WP:BLP (as: Filomena R. or Laura M.).
 Be careful not to change the verb tense of events (such as "have appealed" to become "will appeal"), when most editors have carefully chosen the wording of events to reflect the legal sources.
 Mignini has tried to sue organizations, so we want to keep text about him to a minimum phrase+source, while in the middle of other topics.
 Avoid trying to POV-push anyone's guilt or innocence, just word the text using common phrases, without trying to over-emphasize a legal ruling.
 Remember to use British English, such as: centre, centred, flat (apartment), US (for "U.S."), behaviour, etc.
There might be other issues for the list above, to emphasize why we discuss plans to reword sections, and heed all the related factors. -