"First, I honestly don't care if your different or not."  Now that is a lie: "I have a hard time not being that you are really not DrPizza since your argument starts with another thing as if you were DrPizza. (sic)"  You only say you don't care now since it's been revealed you were wrong.  It's another instance where you shift the argument when you've been proven wrong and engage in a smear campaign.  And what do you mean by, "behind your back"?  That would mean that he would've said "idiot" somewhere he knows you're not going to look (like, say, the History tab, which you don't seem to know about).  Presumably, someone who bothers to edit the NTFS page would clearly read its associated Talk page.  So, once again, you've failed to provide the evidence, and again, shift blame and bring up wholly irrelevant issues to cover your tracks.  It reminds me of Michael Brown being questioned by Congress.  You've failed to demonstrate you had the correct facts.  You've failed to justify your ideology that wikipedia should only be limited to what you deem "mainstream".  And you've failed demonstrate any evidence for your ad hominem attacks, instead, insulting our intelligence by pointing out blaringly obvious facts and insinuating that we are stupid (unlike DrPizza, your language leaves no room for such doubt, and your profile clearly indicates you have no issues with the North American dialect of the English languageOr are you going to backtrack away from your earlier broken argument about language and intention now?), and casting blame in all directions, hoping it sticks somewhere.  These are signs of gross immaturity and a complete failure to be able to put forth a rational, logical argument.  These are your faults, not ours.  Not DrPizza