Blocking and sockpuppets

Okay, yes I DID vandalize the RD Reynolds article. Twice. But I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. I could understand blocking because of vandalism sure, but because of sockpuppetry? Who is this peripirus or whoever person who did this? Surely that is abuse of blocking power? Also this "DX97" is quite clearly a vandal him/her self. Again, if I have been blocked because and only because I vandalized an article, I can accept that. But this "sockpuppet" stuff is unfounded. Could these two people (the blocker, and the one who tagged me) actually state their case without just being smug and rash?