Improving the Twin Paradox article 

Hi. Any edits I have made to the article have been immidiately reverted. I do not wish to impose my own views on the article. However in its current form it does not in any way reflect the complexity or interest inherent in the problem. As an example of a recent paper which relates to your question, so may interest you please see [Moving Observers in An Isotropic Universe]. The paper itself can be downloaded [Pdf version]. This paper differs from my own view - but illustrates the inherent and enduring interest of the problem. My major objection to the wikipedia article in its current form is it solves the paradox by mistating it. i.e. by stating a non-paradox in place of the interesting one(s). How can I go about getting the article expanded to reflect the varying points of view? I don't wan't to get involved in a reverting war. Any advice you can give me would be much appreciated