Lots of little NPOV, verifiability edits needed

I started to work on this article but have been called to a meeting. The overall tone is not especially POV, but their are lots of opinions and weasel words and weasel phrases. "It has been criticized"  Ok, by whom? I've seen much worse, but someone needs to go through and tighten this stuff line by line. Another example is speculation I tagged about the next teams to be included  may be true, may be interesting, but it needs a verifiable reference (a comment on the talk page would suffice). I think it should not take a lot of time to make these many little changes if the editor is knowledgeable on this game.