"

I was reasonable with him. They got a week's notice, for an article that's been tagged as unsourced for six months. You would agree that unsourced information can be removed at any time yes? So you would agree that I didn't have to give them a week's notice to begin with yes? There's actually more information on that that I'll email you shortly for beans reasons. You want explanation for the others? See Northern Ireland and the associated talk page for starters, then see this edit. There is absolutely no consensus for that flag to be in the infobox, it hasn't been there for months. After months of arguing and page protections, the consensus finally was no flag in the infobox and after a couple of months without the flag he ignored it and put it back anyway. Note I wasn't even involved in that dispute, I stayed well clear. I'm not willing to deal with editors who are that intent on being disruptive to push their preferred POV against any consensus, and although I could have phrased it much better my point remains the same, he's not welcome on my talk page. The other matter is irrelevant, as you've seen I've already responded to it on my talk page much earlier. So I don't see the point in going over ground that's already been covered? 303 "