Hello, firstly I don't consider this to be biting:
"rv anon user's attempt to summarise a Labour MP's blog and insert unattributed "most consider" statement"
I referred to you as an anon user to distinguish you from Timrollpickering who had made the previous edit.
Secondly, I didn't approach you; you approached me. You reverted me twice. You referred to me as a "conservative supporter trying to put a gloss on a terrible issue" and said "the new person seems to be on a pro-tory edit spree". If you're going to call me names I'm entitled to ask who you are and it's natural that I should look at your edits. What I saw was a blatant violation of WP:NFT at Chorley and a blatant violation of WP:NPOV at Guerrilla warfare‎ and I naturally reverted. I haven't insulted you and I haven't tried to remove anything from article except what is unacceptable according to Wikipedia guidelines.  (T • C)