corrcting shockingly false and bad edits

I find that just anyone with ony comic-book knowledge can edit this article, and many such do.
I reject 100% any "consensus" with uneducated (in this topic) amateurs. They simply do not know
what they are doing. They misread the references, and often do not read them at all. Example-
p[revious verions was saying Dr Rosen has no corroboration on his findings. Totally  false.
I know the man, went to his lab. The hairs were NOT found to be ordinary animals.

I find Wiki more shockingly bad every day.

beckjord