While previously I had supported the idea of a short section on criticism of the law, I have come to believe that this was an incorrect stance.  There is clearly a slippery slope here, and the increasing number (and decreasing quality) of the sources presented show a definite attempt to put a bias into the article.  This article should be maintained for what the law "is" and not for what the law "could be" or "should be." If the contributors wish to make changes to the legal system, it should be done through legal activism, and not through revision of public information archives.  Start a blog, or something.