Scientific Ethics for Global Warming Taints Conclusions 

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/12/02/climate.stolen.emails/index.html

is definitive in the reporting for how the ACRU staff completely mishandled the research data and mislead those not in the know.

This type of "junk science" puts this whole wiki entry for Global Warming in question.  We have no idea what data really is valid.  All the links to other websites need to be revisited, revetted and start over.  Otherwise, wikipedia has no credibility as well.  Is wikipedia politically correct as well or will it stay pure and put all this research in question as it has many other entries on the pedia?