I'm not being aggressive.  You want to add information that I find to be redundant and unnecessary.  You want to add information goes against consensus.  You want to add information that has been discussed on this page many, many times  You have also broached the position that since the Granholm article refers to "Canadian-born" then the Cruz article must also.  I asked you to provide your reasoning for your proposal.  I'm not insinuating anything.  I want you to provide reasons other than point to the Granholm article, which is an article about a politician that was born a Canadian and became an American at 21, and explain why Granholm's situation should be the guiding principal behind Cruz's article, which is an article about a politician that was an American and a Canadian at birth, not when he turned 21 years old?  I ask again, what is your reasons?