:::::: My point I was trying to make earlyer was not that the brithers are not a fringe group that factialy incorectt.  I was trying to say that the article is incorectly titled in an efort to blitle the birther movement.  If you were to look up what a conspricy is you would find that a conspricy involves mulitipule conspritors entering in to an agreement to preform an illegal act.  Every time i have seen clips of Orly Taitz, the "mother" of the birther movment, she claims that Obama's mother could have falsely claimed that her son was born in Hawaii to curcomvent imagration problems.  If this were the case it would not constitite a conspricy,  it would have been one woman lying to the state to get a brith cirtificate.  the proposed theories are nothing like other examples of conspiracy theories.  If you look at the JFK conspiracy theories page you will see it stated at the very top of the article who the aleged conspritors are, same with the truthers page.  In this page you don't.