Hey, there's nothing wrong with our language's wonderful (and all its less than wonderful nuances!) prose rules. Anyway, I digress!! Thanks for your speedy responses, and a nice little article. Well done, I've passed it. All the best with any future improvements on this and other articles.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
 
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 
 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
 
Overall: 
Pass/Fail: