I don't think Xinhua should be included, except for statistics which could be included arguably, and if its followed by a contrasting statement by TIbetan dissidents of a particular incident that no foreign journalist has reported on. Either of these 2 requirements has justified why Xinhua is sourced in the article the few times that it has been. The RFA is propaganda based as well, so its emotionally charged and subjective statements should NOT be included. Also, the info the report has already been reported on by foreigners.