"== FA project ==

In November 2008, we launched a project to bring this article to Featured Article status. Here is the charter, process and sign-up sheet. New members are welcome. Just add your name at the bottom and let us know what you would like to do.    

Goal
 To improve the Sustainability article to meet the  featured article standard as assessed by  Wikiproject Environment.
     
Process
 This will be a collaborative editing project. Decisions on article content will be made by consensus. Consensus decision-making is defined as: ""a group decision making process that not only seeks the agreement of most participants, but also the resolution or mitigation of minority objections."" When a vote is required, a two-thirds supermajority will be considered consensus. 
 Participants working on the project will strive to be civil, assume good faith, focus on content, not contributors, and observe Wikiquette.

Sign-up
If you support this project and subscribe to the goals and process described above, please sign below indicating your skills, preferred role, and availability. Skills needed include: research, writing, editing, copyediting, graphics, FA criteria assessment, etc.
    - mediation, editing, article standards, verification of online sources; moderately available now (> 1 hr/da). Sunray's edits are in blue
    - research, writing, editing (1/2 to 1 hr/day). Granitethigh's edits are in green
 Talk page  - copyedit, checking for weasel words (various availability)
    - research (especially citations), editing (various availability). Travelplanner's edits are in purple
   - writing, editing, copyediting (1 hr/day) Nick's edits are in orange

Welcome Editors who wish to join the project, are welcome to add their name above. Then contact us on the main talk page about what you would like to do and any questions you have.

 Peer Review 

I missed the following comments which have been available for a few days and have put them here so that all is clear - please put them back if this is not procedure. A few brief comments:

 R says there is a way to go on WP:MOS which is his area of expertise. I assume if we address each of his points one by one then that should improve matters. He does not suggest going for GA but that is still an option.
 He thinks the UN references look reliable - but not sure if this is a comment on npov too.
 Perhaps we need additional comment on the subject area, npov and other aspects of the article as well as WP:MOS etc.
  
Sustainability
Previous peer review

 A script has been used to generate a semi- review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009. Category:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews

I've listed this article for peer review because we are preparing to list it as a featured article candidate. The regular editors of the article are too close to it and need a fresh pair of eyes to see what we do not see. We have likely nailed down many of the formatting issues, but are nevertheless looking for both ""big picture"" advice (