Lone boatman, it is you who have willfully and repeatedly violated Wikipedia's policies by making entire changes to the 'eternity clause' article then threatening me as usual. And you ask me now to stay "cool" as you continue to manipulate editors and possible administrators to cover your wrongdoings. Oh, I am staying "cool". You know full and well that I am staying "cool". If I was not cool I would have deleted your last changes. It is you who made the last changes, not me. Hopefully, administrators will see through your manipulations and make the right decisions. Clearly, you wanted a "concensus" and several other editors suddenly turned up for te first time. What a coincidence! You are not aiming at a "concensus," but are vandalizing (sabotaging) the 'eternity clause' article.  

___________________________

JanetteDoe, You are right that the referenced article in National Review is about not changing the fundamental principles of democracy, not a "constitution". And this is why I have a BIG problem with Lone boatman and the three other "editors" who suddenly showed up for the first timee and agreed with Lone boatman. Lone boatman does not want the word "democracy". After I accused him of synthesizing he then took revenge by changing the entire article into a catch all international page in which he redefines 'eternity clause' as a "term" used internationally instead of the colloquial description specific to Article 79 paragraph (3) of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. This page was part of the German law page specific to Germany, not an international one which is already covered under a Wikipedia article entitled "entrenched clause". Lone boatman added the additional international data at the top of the page only to cover up the 'eternity clause' article. And again he focused on the word "constitution" at the top of his change. And when I told him he had wrongfully duplicated the "entrenched clause" to pursue his use of the word "constitution" (which I had previously told him Germany does not have), he then added "Basic Law" to his change to make it appear that he is not politically motivated with his changes. Then several editors suddently showed up for the first time and one of them deleted the entire 'eternity clause' article, leaving only what Lone boatman had put in at the top. Wikipedia is apparently no place to safeguard an article, even a properly referenced article, which the article was. And it was not a personal essay on a statute, as I have been accused of. It is an important historic prohibition placed in the Germany's Basic Law regarding the protection of Germany's new democracy.