Personally, I would have to disagree. The reason mainly being, as the famous wikipedia user box goes “even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake." What I mean is, glancing at wikipedia, is the general process of the media or public to gain a quick background knowledge of an individual. I think it’s important to make the distinction in all areas and I believe that by doing this, it would prevent people from simply naming him cofounder without have looking at the full story. I think wikipedia has the responsibility as the primary source of quick information to make sure its got the correct story in all places. To paraphrase the above user box.. If 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's wikipedia's job to set them straight. Obviously this is just my personal opinion. Thanks. DocHeuh