"

Archived discussions:

 Redirect from hoax page ""Hamlet of Denmark"" 

Hello ! I just wanted to point out that the redirect that you created from Hamlet of Denmark should point to Prince Hamlet (which is the article dedicated to the character) and not to Hamlet. Best regards! (talk) 
 I thought about it, but the play also has King Hamlet, the ghost. (I have no preference either way; if you believe Prince Hamlet would have been a better target, I might reduce the protection for a while, so that you can change it.) -   
 Well, I confess that I have absolutely no idea about how to find whether people who search for ""Hamlet of Denmark"" are more interested in the prince or in the king. I would say the prince, but it would be only a conjecture. Given the ambiguous nature of the expression, your choice seems the most reasonable. Sorry if I didn't give a better thought on it before contacting you. Cheers! (talk) 

 Why my page has been deleted? 

I want to know what was wrong about the last page i've created: Making Sense. I want to republish it, what do I have to change?

Thanks.   

 Jewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question) 
Hi
@Mike Rosoft: please explain where the text is promotion of the book and the ideas contained in the book? In the first time is better that define the portion of text that had problem.
  
 Considering the draft presents a hateful and insane conspiracy theory by a white supremacist as if it were factual?   

Hi
@Ian.thomson: Please talk about Wikipedia rules and do not tell insult word. I say that this is not a valid reason for speed deletion. The admin must stated it in talk page until solved.
  

@Mike Rosoft:Please reply to my question. Do is G11 rule in speed deletion? 
  
The draft presented lies by a known conspiracy theorist as ""meticulously research.""  To call that promotional is better than that deserves.
WP:G11 says that ""Unambiguous advertising or promotion"" is to be speedily deleted.  The lies David Duke wrote were promoted as ""meticulously research.""    

@Ian.thomson: You have a personal problem with this book and the idea of the author. Please observe the rules and don't tell loose talk. This is your idea about this book that is a lies but many people in the world are against to your idea. I decided to edit this subject and submit in this page. 
  

@Mike Rosoft: In the content and purpose of book sections, I selected and wrote several sentence from this book. So, I think some people had against idea with it. I want introduce this book just and i had not any goal. please explain about text and say where have problem?
  
   and ""What Wikipedia is not"". -   
: I can change this sentence and remove this adverb. Can you restore this page until fix this section? [[User:AliAkar|AliA