Circumcision controversy 

I see that you are currently at the forefront of a dispute with Jake Waskett. The article linked here provides very interesting background about Mr Waskett. What I do not understand is why somebody who is pushing this bizarre point of view is allowed to continue to have a voice on Wikipedia. Mr Waskett is not a scientist; he is somebody who has a sexual fetish. His contributions are in no way objective or unbiased. He pushes for undue weight to be accorded to data which appear to support his own bizarre position. Is there nothing that can be done to get him, and people like him, banned from Wikipedia? I am not suggesting that there should be no free intellectual enquiry on this and other subjects, but some people are not engaged in such enquiry: they are involved in pushing a bizarre, extreme point of view that has no actual basis in scientific research, however much they would like to claim that it does.