WTF 

Holy cow, Leifern, this is way out of line. You challenged the wording of a sentence which was cited to a source which used the same wording. For your benefit, I added another footnote to the same reference, at exactly the spot where you had challenged it. And then I added, to the reference, the direct quote of the reference using the same wording. And then you remove it saying "Reference does not document the assertion, so I'm taking it out as an example of well-poisoning"! What gives, Leifern!?