In the other recent situation's discussion, i see now that SarekOfVulcan later asserted, incorrectly, that I had characterized a new user's edits in a way that "is misleading to the point of disruption".  SarekOfVulcan apparently believed that I meant to misrepresent that a new user's contribution was acceptable as written, which I did not say or mean.  In this instance, Orlady, as usual following my edits, actually helped out by providing some advice to the new user.  SarekOfVulcan has made some too-strong, snap judgments, I think, that are incorrect.  I think there are differences of opinion worth discussing, but that SarekOfVulcan's block is not justified. ncram