Instead of just stating what should be done, be bold and provide sources to prove that they're not, or use Wikipedia policy to disprove the current references as credible, such as I am about to do. Reference 2 (NME) is a questionable source because it is full of personal opinions and bias. And reference 3 (New York Times) states that "Paramore is loosely affiliated with the world of emo". Is loose affiliation enough to place Paramore in the Emo genre? I'm going to be bold, and say no; this is probably going to start some edit war, but I'm removing the Emo genre from the page as per WP:QS. Without credible sources, I will hunt down sources which prove they are not of the Emo genre and place them on this talk page. And before anyone points at the Joshua Martin quote saying that it proves they're emo, that is a writer's personal opinion of what they think Paramore's music sounds like. It would be like saying... French toast is bread, but with icing sugar, and its less healthy; yet French toast and bread aren't the same thing. They may seem similar, and may have qualities of each other, but they don't taste, look, smell, or feel like each other... and in before "French toast isn't Paramore", it's an analogy... I really need to eat before I edit, only analogy I could think of is food-related. (>O_o)>  X <(^_^<)