Nature
Since the article was first nominated for Core Topics COTF it has advanced in quality considerably.  This is largely due to the work of . While doing so, he has contended with the continual one issue commentary (on the talk page) of .  The latter seems to want to make the article into a philosophy of science article on the meanings of the term "Nature."  As a result, I would suggest that major editorial changes to the article may not be necessary (or possible without incurring an edit war).  On the other hand, the article would likely benefit from a good copyedit.  However, I haven't read the article for some time to see how well it hangs together. Perhaps I should do that now. If you would also look at it in that light, we could compare notes. See you on the talk page