::: If you were actually arguing the value judgement by providing alternative Merc OLC systems there'd actually be a sound reason for compromise.  Few, some, many, most, widely have common sense meanings and are not in general in any way harmful nor even contentious as would be first, last, notable, nonnotable, best, worst and others.  No I see no reason to compromise unless the poster        has an argument that the observation "widely used" is blatantly fallacious or harmful to the article.