Are you someone's "Toy Boy"? Is that what your alias alludes to? What right have you with no physics credentials to dare to judge a PhD in physics with 45 years in the field? The world is growing stupid. Anti-Gray wrote about the Wikitors

"YOU MIGHT BE A PSEUDOSCIENTIST IF:

1) You believe your subscription to Analog provides the
necessary background to argue with PhD scientists.

2) You think "real" science is mostly developed in garages or
hobby rooms.

3) You think scientists are inflexible to changing paradigms
(using one of pseudoscientists' favorite terms). See
definition of "Science."

4) You think the government, big business, or traditional
scientists are in a conspiracy to prevent the
pseudoscientists from showing the "truth" to the rest of
the world, motivated by such movies as "Chain Reaction."

5) You think science is purely to start a business and make
money.

6) You think it's cool to announce impossible-sounding claims
to the media without a peer review process (see #4 above),
expository discussion, or other legitimizing process. You
may believe the US Patent Office is a legitimizing process,
if they aren't in conspiracy with #4 above.

7) You're aiming for the Einsteinian turn-science-upside-down
revolution of thought and universal understanding, based on
your two years of high school physics and a copy of Omni
magazine.

8) You think highly suspicious behavior is actually the way
people protect themselves from intellectual theft.

9) Your ego is large enough to tell the world that its
understanding of the universe has always been wrong, and
your fantastic, undocumented, unverified, unrecorded, and
unreproducable experiment proves it.

10) Your college degree (if you have one) and your
pseudoscientist interests have absolutely nothing in common.
For instance, you may be arguing about fusion with a PhD in
nuclear physics (and inflating your ego by doing so), while
you only have a degree in zoology."

Latest from Sarfatti about the Ira Einhorn case

jpg of CIA Memo of 1963 by Richard Helms on Soviet Paranormal R&D;
and Clandestine Services

"Most of Ira's book is like reading Casanova, about his erotic exploits with women in Ireland. I have no doubt they are true, but the tales, though entertaining at first quickly grow weary if one is not a teenager or an Oprah addict. They are irrelevant, except to prove that Ira did not smell. Women were attracted to him. He did not smell at all when I met him in 1974.  Ira's understanding of "free energy" and his reference to Tom Bearden are not to my liking because the physics is wrong. However, his connections to the Yugoslavs in 1977 when Holly was murdered, the Shah of Iran's family and many of his political activities made him many powerful enemies with the motive and opportunity to frame him and to weaken the movement he was spearheading. Ira's account of a UFO close encounter rings true. Note Ira's mention of Michael Murphy, Kit Green and Jacques Vallee.

For "free energy" read "zero point vacuum energy". Ira is not a physicist and he was fooled by disinformation agent Colonel Tom Bearden whose claims are worthless. At that time I had not yet figured out the physics of what Ira was after. He was my book agent and I was one of his network of "300" that corresponds also to http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html

I would not solve the paranormal physics Russian psychotronics weapons problem of DCI Richard Helms until the mid 1990's, i.e. the necessity of signal nonlocality from "two way relation" between pilot BIT wave and IT particle "hidden variable" and the consequent replacement of micro-quantum theory with the macro-quantum theory of "More is different" emergent systems.

I would not solve the UFO problem until 2001 when the meaning of "dark energy" for "metric engineering warp and wormhole" dawned on me as through the glass darkly. The glass is getting less opaque."

A copy of Sarfatti's PhD degree is in open directory http://qedcorp.com/APS/

SIGNED BY Jack Horner no more sitting in The Corner on Sept 25, 2005 10:20 PM Pacific Coast Time