Who said Kryptonsite has a bad reputation? No one that I know of. The problem is that their site is not considered a reliable source, because they are a fansite. Please read verifiability, where it states that it isn't about what is "true", but about what we can show. Unfortunately, we cannot show that Kryptonsite was given those titles by someone up the ladder, or that their "official write-ups" are attained officially. It isn't to discredit them, it's about Wikipedia standards and rules, and we have to be able to attribute reliable sources to our information. If Kryptonsite conducted a personal interview, and they posted that where we could source it (i.e. not just on their front page), then that would be ok. But getting information from scoopers, or unattributed producers makes it hard to consider them reliable sources, per our definition of such. I read their site all time, and love it. THAT is the reason, along with the fact that Craig Byrne has written two official companions, that their site makes our external links cut.   (Contact me)