(in response to "Sorry about that...", refactored back here, as it says on the header of my talk page I prefer to keep conversations together. Second try to keep this threaded. I watch talk pages and WILL see replies)

Yeah, sorry I "snapped" about your message on my talk page. I kind of misinterpreted it. (And actually, someone else randomly wrote to me too...)  | Write to me, why don't you? 

It is no problem at all. As you surmised, I WAS trying to make a few points though. The points being
I think your reason for opposing Ezau is ill considered. 
I think putting "write to me please" begging in your signature is ill considered as well. 
I think the two of them together really clash, and I'm not the only person that feels that way. 
I don't know Ezau from Adam, so it's not like I'm sticking up for him because of prior history, but I think he's getting a raw deal for no good reason at all. I DO plan to allow an RfA on myself soon enough and I'm going to be terrifically disappointed if people use my balance of talk vs non talk, article vs wikipedia etc as a reason to oppose. I would ask you to reconsider your vote, and your statement, which has influenced others. +: t/c