Well, first, I find it rather strange (to put it midly) that you agree to discuss it in the TALK page (since I asked to let's discuss it first please) but you go ahead and do a revert anyway and call this "revert campaign".  That aside, I left the note for the person who had reverted the article, but you responded on his/her behalf by saying  "fine, let's discuss it".  I find this also rather strange.  Finally, I don't see mentioning Pilz is Jewish to be controversial at all.  Iran's official response to this still unsubstantiated allegation has been that it is part of a Zionist media smear campaign.  Therefore, how could you say that the fact the Pilz is Jewish is irrelevant?  I see it as quite relevant.  I also don't see why mentioning a Jewish person is Jewish should be viewed as controversial even in normal course of events and contexts.  Really bizarre.