SHANES: There is no way I bow to the unjustice and comply to that arrogant bastard. That guy reverted my edition based on the fact he claimed arrogantly that his version was better than the others. Well......you better tell me if that was a resason good enough. ALSO, Why didn't he need to start a discussion before he changed the previous article while I am asked everytime to start a discussion to so-called defend my edition?! Why he wasn't asked to defend his action while I was called to defend my edition?! This is absolutely ridiculous and obviously, there is a double standard. This guy changes others edition for the sake of changing it. He only knows to mess around and stirs up trouble. I am just here to defend  my rights and not let it exploited by some troublemakers. By the way, I think I have better things to do but the only reason why I come back and persistently reverting it back to the changed version only because there is absolutely no justice. I don't want to accuse you but I think your handling is a very one-sided and biased.