Historicism has been held pretty much the same from antique through Medieval through modern times. (There were a few outliers at first.)  It's not until you get to the Counter-Reformation that you begin to get large promotion of Futurism and Preterism (both of which were invented and designed by Jesuits as a specific challenge to protestant Historicism).  Its interesting the Catholic Futurism and Modern Critical Scholarship find their basis in Porphyry a pagan philosopher who railed against Christianity and especially against Bible prophecy in the 4th century.  I don't find it at all curious that John J. Collins, as a Catholic, promotes Modern Scholarship and Futurism.  Its what I'd expect.
Whenever you take on any part of the topic of Bible prophecy you can expect that it is a huge undertaking, because there is nothing simple about it.  One might limit oneself to just a single viewpoint, but that's not what Wikipedia is about.  You have to have a NPOV, and to do that with Bible prophecy you have to discuss just about every aspect of it.