Oppose For the sake of this decision, I don't believe including their occupations would be consistent with the de-facto policies of this article as apparently established through consensus.  On a personal level, I find the occupations of the parents interesting and don't see the harm in including them.  My philosophy is the more well-sourced facts in the article the better.  But if prior suspensions, prior arrests, various audio recordings, and the like are excluded for a lack of relevance then it would be impossible to argue that the occupations of either of their parents is relevant.