Another thing: without accurate information on Reserved names in NTFS, this article is of questionable value to anyone attempting to learn about NTFS to conduct forensics on an NTFS volume.  i.e. if you tell them "there's no way to create a file named aux", when clearly there is a way, that is both inaccurate and misleading, ending up wasting a lot of time in an investigation.  By your dubious "not mainstream" doctrine, this NTFS article would be a lot shorter.  However, since it is already attempting to spell out a number of NTFS features that clearly are not of interest to a non-technical person (thereby putting into question your "not mainstream" doctrine), including what names are reserved in NTFS, that information should be accurate.  The article, as it reads now, is not accurate.  It's not nitpicking, it's about being correct.   Really Not DrPizza