The disagreement with Yeezus was over his insistence on using the term "Rave Reviews."  I can't imagine any objective "encyclopedia" using such a subjective term.  What is wrong with allowing reviews to speak for themselves, rather than spin something that is, in itself, already a spin?  In the case of "Reloaded," the two reviews I mentioned were from "Rolling Stone," and "Spin," magazine.  And, contrary to Khanassassin's  assertion that no reviews were overly positive, these two happened to be extremely so, with very little, if any, negative criticism.  There were actually quite a few "raves" for the album, and  I gave extra weight to Rolling Stone because it is a magazine often cited by Dan56, who's edting was serving as my model,  and because Rolling Stone did not base their response on Minaj's "rejection" of hip hop, as some in the hip hop community see her actions.  Being a more rock-base source, the review seemed quite nuanced and even-handed, while many of the hip-hop oriented magazines seemed annoyed with her "pop" side.