MY POST ISN'T ORIGINAL RESEARCH - IT'S SIMPLE FACT!  What is so difficult for you to understand - it's FACT that's the way lagalese works - position statements are part of legalese.  You're saying you'd skip over the statement "water is wet" as original research.  Quite frankly your assertion that it is original research is LUDACRIS!  I don't know whether or not your intentionally mischaracterizing things, or whether you're truely this ignorant!
 There is a HUGE point in having this discussion - it's a refutation of avraham's assertion that the 1975 policy statement is irrelevant - but it's apparently a refutation that you don't have the knowledge of legalese to understand - which isn't my fault.  I'm not going to explain to you, a third time, the legalese equivalent of "water is wet"
 The simple FACT is you're wrong - it's not my problem that you don't have a good enough education to understand why despite my explaining it to you.