You're not assuming good faith.  I read the article the day the movie came out, so I was unaware of the correction.  I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie.  Furthermore, my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate.  I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view.  But something being a minority view doesn't make it an incorrect view or vandalism.  If you disagree with me, you can reword my blurb to your liking, but to call it vandalism is petty.