Re images and Commons: I see Commons as a picture archive, there for using by students, researchers and writers. You general reader doesn't go there. It's usefulness is to people who are already in the know. The captions often leave much to be desired, the pics aren't sequentially arranged. When one uses an image in a picture, it has to "tell the story". The pics that I selected for the body of the article are the "bigger picture" so to speak. One really wants to see the interior of the church, and the interior of the chapter house. These pics don't fit into a gallery well, because they are detailed. However, the pics that I put down in the gallery, are all "details" already. A gallery needs to add real value, and it's about the captions.  I do wish that the exterior view that shows so much information- the shape of the church, the cloister, the dome, the portal and so on, was a really good photo instead of a grainy shot that doesn't enlarge well. But is looks OK at small size in the article.