Feedback- Konstantin Kakanias 

@bender235
Thank you for your feedback on my article "Konstantin Kakanias" above. May I assume that you issued the feedback on the main article page as well as the Talk:Konstantin Kakanias page. I am seeking further clarification on a few points. If you have the kindness and the time, please advise in further detail on the following, at your convenience:

-In the critique of the article you (I assume) felt the article was written as if I were personally involved with Kakanias. Would you tell me what part or parts of the article read as too personal? I believe I used numerous external references and links to support the article text. 
- On the talk:Konstantin Kakanias page it says "This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale." Is it possible to be more specific in terms of what the article is missing or what should be left out in order to improve the ranking?  
-On the main page I received the feedback: "This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it." In fact I was careful to create 20 links to other Wikipedia articles within the body of the main article. Am I missing something here? 

Again thank you for your assistance. I would like to make any necessary improvements.