"What was cleverly inserted instead"
Thanks for assuming bad faith in your edit summary, Smatprt. Are you really going to put up a separate fight to retain the ugly and illogical use of  "term" on each of the involved pages? After there was 100% support for my rewrite at Shakespearean authorship question,, I was hoping you'd have the grace to let it go when I inserted the same changes here.  May I ask what exactly it is you suspect me of? My changes at  Shakespearean authorship question were intended as neutral stylistic improvements; everybody else thought that's what they were; but you keep implying I have some evil agenda (and therefore keep reverting me). What is that agenda, exactly?  Can't we try to assume that we're all trying to improve William Shakespeare and it's subarticles?   | talk .