You care about it, as apodictically demonstrated by the fact that you responded and that you changed one of your less-than-literate edits.

 Regarding the bias and illogic of your edit, the excuse in your edit summary doesn't make sense, as it doesn't explain why you deleted mention of Prof. Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory, particularly since you yourself called Deutsch an "eminent physicist" in your own edit (i.e., that statement wasn't there before): of which argues against the notion that you consider the physics of the Omega Point Theory as fringe. Further, you deleted mention of the fact that Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the leading theologians in the world, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory and Tipler's position that the Omega Point is consistent with the Judeo-Christian God.

 So by your own words, you must consider Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory to be noteworthy, and yet you deleted mention of this endoresement in an area where you yourself agree that Deutsch is eminently qualified and replaced it with a large displayed quotation regarding a matter that Deutsch has no qualification or erudition in, even though the previous version already clearly mentioned that Deutsch disagrees that Omega Point is God. Moreover, in this edit you delete all mention of the fact that an actual trained theologian, Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the world's leading theologians, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory.

 Your edit is so ridiculously biased and illogical that it's a sick joke.74.4.222.208