Well, I do interpret that as "apology" that is not entirely, not quite; though, maybe, nearly.

You have put extensive effort into it however, which might indicate some sincerity, even if I feel further  insulted.

So, as another problem w/ this website, you might just not comprehend many features of what I have been saying about the website's features.

Or, maybe you like having me typewrite f/ several hours extra, as I've already proclaimed that it's excruciating.

This may not be accurate; but, very little of what you,  many of you, say about me is anywhere close to accurate:  I feel as if I, me, am fighting from w/in my disabilities, on the largest website, aside from  searchengines, against several thousand members of an  oligarch   plutocrat   overclass, with the wealth to purchase a new machine, w/ the best programming, every time a new  television commercial  flashes.

Again, that may not be accurate; but, that is how it seems.

Through nearly two years, I've fought through many misperceptions.  Several of you have insisted on "brain damaged".  One  aqua  has insisted that I'm too European, something that it had found on another website about France, Italy.

Now, role has insisted that I'm too American, despite what I've written about  bbcamerica, & that I do not comprehend a clock, nor a  calendar.

You've deleted my response to those attacks; you've deleted my plea for more description of the wings.   Your deletion converted role's attacks into libel.  Minor, virtually insignificant libel; but, libel  nonetheless.

&, with all of the other libel that you, all of you, have attacked me with, for two years, how else might I stop it?

As long as you insist that you were correct all along, that  obviates all  apology:

  I would urge you not to remove other's {others'} comments with a summary of "libel" unless they really are. I still don't see any libel in them.

That sentence means that you assert the right to  label, including  libel.  That is not apology.

First you have me too European, then too American, both as insults,..... libel.

If someone offers an apology, then virtually completely contradicts it, well, what is that?

When I had heard  Peter_Burkill's name, I had input his name, immediately, on this website.  That brought me to that page.  I had recalled another crash long ago.  I'd, eventually, confirmed the name, through some searches,  Alfred_Haynes.  I wanted to assert a connection there, & honor them.

You can clearly see when I'd learned of  Eric_Moody,  John_Coward.  Each of those names are rather ironic, considering who they are, in reality.

Why does what I've said of the wings  offend you such that you cannot even acknowledge that I've said it many, many times over?

Well, I know, factually, that I've read several messages, pining f/ a way, to trick me off, force me off, otherwise get rid of,.....

Well, one specific method to reduce the time that I have to scribe on this website would also be positive: if I could figure how to start one, or more, of my own.  It is obvious that many of you do not prefer positive  modi operandi.  But, however, maybe one of you, @ least one, is truly positive, & sufficiently  knowledgeable.

If any of you are positive, yet approximately as  ignorant  as I am, I would accept, welcome, your assistance anyhow.

I do hope to improve this  disambiguation:
  Solar_Sailor 
  SolarSailor 
  Solar_Sailor_Holdings_Ltd 
  Solar_Sailor_Holdings_ 
  solar_wing 
  Tron:_Solar_Sailer 
 < http://solarsailor.com/media_downloads.htm >;
 < http://solarsailor.com >;
 < http://solarsailor.com/images/header.jpg >.

[[ hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. -]]