Ah, wait.  I think I see what TallMagic is talking about.  He's saying that the ODA advises site visitors that the [www.ope.ed.gov/accreditation/Search.asp Office of Postsecondary Education] of the United States Department of Education has questionable accuracy in its database of accredited U.S. colleges.  But, we are to blindly accept that an Archive.org snapshot of the Oregon ODA is infallible, even better and more perfect than a very similar database kept by the United States government.  We're to believe that it's important for Wikipedia to assert that WIU was "operating illegally", even though this charge was never mentioned in any news source of any kind, even though this charge was never filed in any court in Pennsylvania or any court in any jurisdiction in the world.  And we're to take this on the word of someone who has been lambasting unaccredited institutions across the Internet for decades, who can't find a single like-minded editor other than an admin with whom he shares 90% of their joint editing activity on articles dealing with unaccredited institutions.  

The phrase "operating illegally" occurs 44 times in Wikipedia article space. I count 12 of those 44 where the phrase is used to describe the phenomenon of an unaccredited educational organization.  I wonder if I searched the history of those 12 articles, would I find that either TallMagic or his partner admin Orlady have added that phrase "operating illegally" to Wikipedia, and whether the source will be cited, and if so, will it be a mainstream media report that asserts the importance, or whether it will be an Archive.org snapshot of this purportedly infallible Oregon state website?  I think I'll go check those 12 articles now, and I'll report what I find either here, or in an Administrator's Notice.