Glossary templates question 

Hi. I've recently been learning about and implementing the glossary templates at a few articles, and am greatly appreciative. So first off, thanks! (They've been happily received at Glossary of chess and Glossary of chess problems, and nobody has objected to them at Glossary of botanical terms.)

There's a complication at Glossary of ancient Roman religion, where, the editors are very receptive to the possibilities, but are wondering if it's possible to retain the per-entry [edit] links, that they currently enjoy from having each entry in a ====sub-header====. Any suggestions?