I'm talking about you making unjustified major changes. In this  edit. Did you just restore "caused criticism" in the lede? No. No, you didn't. You reverted to your own preferred wording (removing sources etc in the process) the entire "Election of Constitutional Court Judges" section. Does that diff look like you're just restoring two words to the lede? I don't know, maybe somebody slipped something in  my coffee this morning, but that sure as hell does not look like just restoring two words to the lede, so please, cut it out.
And speaking of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:GAME here is the context:
I edit the "Election of Constitutional Court Judges" section to clarify, provide info and fix some blatant mistakes.
You blindly revert within minutes claiming it's "unsourced" even though most of the text you added to the article was unsourced as well.
I add sources . You complain about the refs being just bare urls. Which is a valid criticism... if you hadn't blindly reverted within minutes, not even giving me the chance to fill out the refs.
I, others, fill out the refs.
You revert anyway with an edit summary "ce, restore" , effectively pretending your edit is just some minor grammar corrections, rather than blatant edit warring.
So. I add text, you complain about lack of sources and revert, I add sources, you complain about formatting and revert, the refs are formatted to your specifications, you revert anyway under the disguise of a "copy edit". Now. Who's playing WP:GAMEs and who's got the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality here?