I was not going to reply but have changed my mind after you reinstated your comments when it was obvious I had read them and I could not find a reason or policy for your reinstating them onto my talkpage.  

Links 1-5 were appropriate and restrained responses to trolling and inappropriate behaviour on the part of Askolnik. The one you singled out as "worse" was an accurate edit.  

On 6-10 you obviously did not look at the actual edits;  all of them were appropriate edits to articles.  Frankly, I am surprised that non-NPOV edits are  protected by administrators.  Wikistalking has to involve some sort of harassment.  Placing citation requests on POV statements (that could be deleted just because they are unsourced} and making other positive edits is not harassment.

I was even more surprised to see an administrator remove a copyvio template when there is obvious copyright violation (Skeptic's Dictionary).  I didn't say anything about that, either.

Indeed, I have been very patient in the face of inappropriate behaviour on the part of Askolnick and KarlBunker, including inappropriate comments and ganging up together to evade the 3RR rule to prevent articles from being edited.  It is patently unfair for Askolnick and KarlBunker to be allowed to violate Wikpedia policy at will.  It appears that they take exception to any attempt to remove POV from an article if it is their POV.

I am more than surprised that you changed a warning into a block merely because I deleted harassing, unfounded attacks placed on my talk page by Askolnik even after I requested him not to.

It's not as if I'm the first person they've harassed and I'm surprised to see administrative support and tacit approval of their actions. -