That is all very nice and good cyclic logic, but I would like a second opinion. Otherwise, as I have said, without acutally putting the offence in front of me it can be interpreted as weasel words and intimidation tactics. Also if I have bothered you so much, then for the reason of conflict of interest as well, I deserve a second opinion, and not from one of your admin clique buddies either. Also you seem to know what violation I have commited with Talk:Nontrinitarianism/References, instead of waving the whole manual of Wikipedia in front of me, I'm asking you to show it to me.