Gaimhreadhan has moved the following out of context comment by Vintagekit's Mentor, SirFozzie, from his talk page to this page where it can be seen in context:
I recommend that you drop this. You have been asked somewhat nicely twice by Admins to either take it to WP:SSP if you had any further suspicions. Now I am giving you pretty much a final warning. Accusing a new editor of being a sockpuppet breaks WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. There is methods to deal with sockpuppetry on WP. Use them. I also notice several comments aimed at trolling other users and soapboaxing. You are on the edge. Take care not to step over.  
1. I have not made and am not making any accusations of sockpuppetry. (Please don't confuse Domer48's wrongful and hysterical misunderstanding of my actual words with what I actually wrote.) Allegations of Sockpuppetry are WP's equivalent of a Witch hunt - and I refuse to participate in such silly nonsense.
My understanding is that neither Tyrenius nor yourself are acting as admins here unless you specifically state that you are so acting. If that is the case I will, of course, follow your advice - even though it seems perverse.
2. Had you not addressed specific remarks to me, I would have stayed silent - as you both should have done.
3. This is what I have already stated: "I think it would be very helpful at this early stage for User:Brixton Busters to confirm or deny that he previously edited WP using different user names" (to his current "new" user name of Brixton Busters) " - it's entirely a matter for him whether he chooses to reveal those identities or not...."
and
4. "However, if" Brixton Buster "(and not you or any other members of the team) does so assert," (ie that he, BrixtonBuster, is a genuine new editor and has not previously edited on WP using other and different user name[s]) "then I will say no more and, as I've previously stated, if BB does instead confirm the obvious," (ie that BB is not a brand new editor) "it's entirely a matter for him whether he chooses to reveal those previous identities BB has edited under or not."
and
5. "Now why don't we all pause to allow the subject of this discussion to speak for himself?"...(kiwiexile at DMOZ)  •