Fair enough. As we've all seen even experienced editors hit the "electric fence" when the edits are coming in rapidly, my attitude has always been that a friendly reminder on this particular topic is never a bad thing, especially when, in some cases, the alternative is to let a tendentious editor goad someone into an accidental 3RR violation, and then WP:GAME the system with a WP:AN3 report to "take out" the other side. Also, my understanding of WP:3RR is that the rule applies per page, not per section of text. Also please bear in mind that one person's bias is another's NPOV - for example my add-back of the Attorney General language was made in good faith and is explained at Talk:Sarah Palin#Attorney General. You may well disagree with it and I may well turn out to be wrong, but as an editor with a couple thousand edits myself, and as someone who participates actively and regularly in talk page discussions, I would hope you would consider my edit proposals worthy of talk page discussion as opposed to a simple revert.  T/C