I'm sure many people would object to the images on the article anus, or prefer to have a "choice" to wether or not view them. Yet there they are, since Wikipedia is not censored. I also already drew comparisons to spoiler tags, since the objection to the images seems to be that they are in a sence spoilers. If you look both links, you see that hiding the ink spot image is big deviation of the standard practise, when far more controvesial material is shown plainly. Quite frankly I fail to see a reason for hiding the image that is not plain silly. It is just an ink spot, after all. It is not Rorschach images are hard to come by, but the current image has the added value of authencity, and should be shown openly, as is Wikipedia's purpose. However, it is not Wikipedia's job to cater, bend etc. to demands, aesthetics, morals etc. any particular group.