The introduction of this article needs to be changed 

various scholars have agreeded that yadavs are chandravanshi khastriyas and some have not.

The following link can be used to verify that yadavs are khastriyas.

http://books.google.com/books?id=RfdtUUnVQLQC&pg;=PA388&dq;=Yadavs+OBC+kshatriyas&hl;=en#v=onepage&q;=Yadavs%20OBC%20kshatriyas&f;=false

http://www.sishri.org/velir.html  ( This website clearly mentions in some parts of india Yadavs are khastriyas ).

http://storyofkannada.blogspot.com/2008/05/origin-of-seuna-dynasty.html

Also till 1400 AD there were dynasties which claimed that they are yadavs. The descendants of this dynasties still would be living in India. Also the article mentions that only from 19th century yadavs are trying to raise their status. Its wrong. In 1400 AD a dyansty claimed they are yadavs ( chandravanshi ). These people cannot disappear just like that. 

proof some scholars claim yadavs as khastriyas.

http://books.google.com/books?id=RfdtUUnVQLQC&pg;=PA388&dq;=Yadavs+OBC+kshatriyas&hl;=en#v=onepage&q;=Yadavs%20OBC%20kshatriyas&f;=false

book    We and our administration By K. C. Brahmachary  page 388
many scholars agree yadavs as khastriyas and some scholars dont. 

I request kindly to correct the introduction.  please dont neglect these valuable points.  So far there is like three books which mention yadavs as khastriyas.