Hi - Yes, there are such things still included in the article.
1. "Arson" - Sante Kimes was never charged or convicted of arson. Please review the source for that information. I have added a tag to it on the article.
2. The "slavery" charges were appealed in 1990. I do not have the actual paperwork in front of me about it, but I will look online.
3. "Impersonating Elizabeth Taylor", no documentation to support this. Sante Kimes favored Taylor and that is it.
It would probably be best to change this to "Sante Kimes resembled Elizabeth Taylor" or something along those lines. But saying " Impersonating Elizabeth Taylor" sounds like she was defrauding Elizabeth Taylor in some way. Which is also not documented in any sources.
4."...delighted in introducing her husband as an ambassador - a ploy that even gained the couple access to a White House reception during the Ford administration" This statement is just not true.
Thanks.