Rapture Index 

It's interesting to note that the Rapture Index was at its all time low right before Bill Clinton took office, and steadily went up during his time and has stayed in the "Fasten Your Seat-belt" range ever since. Perhaps including this data point into the article would be an informational improvement. 174.31.190.73  

POV Vandalism of Talk Page Comments
And why do we care about the Rapture Index?  (talk) 
It is possible that you don't, but it's a valid comment about possible informational inclusion. It is not a requirement that comments on Talk Pages be "approved" by WP:POV editors with WP:OWN issues. 71.217.108.29  
And you ought not to accuse other editors of vandalism when they are not committing it. Please review what vandalism is and is not before making that accusation again.  (talk) 
Removing valid Talk Comments based on WP:POV bias is in fact vandalism and reverting it is not subject to 3R. You don't have to agree with everything you read on a Talk Page, but branding a comment you fundamentally disagree with as a "troll" is both obnoxious, disingenuous, and simply wrong headed. Removing Talk Comments based on such flawed thinking is in fact vandalism. Are you a censor? Have a nice day. 71.217.108.29  
Since you refuse to refresh yourself on what is not vandalism, let me highlight some relevant policy: "Edit warring is not vandalism and should not be dealt with as such." Or, "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism."

If you and another editor disagree on the appropriateness of a talk page suggestions, that is a content dispute and is not exempt from 3RR.  (talk) 
Leaving a valid comment on a Talk Page is not "disruptive". Falling victim to your own WP:POV and WP:OWN and deleting valid comments on Talk Pages is vandalism. Have a nice day. 71.217.108.29