Proposal: Going back to the bare bones again 

Until this article is deleted as it should have been originally barring admin incompetence, I propose going back to this version, which is the cut-down version deliberately edited.

 The amount of text is more proportionate to his notability.  There isn't much point in having pages and pages of material on somebody who is entirely unnotable. 
 The article doesn't go into detail about the obvious (and well-discussed) problems - it just ignores them.
 This seems to be the best option for BLP reasons.
 This also seems to be the best option in the light of the fact that this article is being edited by people who fundamentally don't understand the problems that we have.
 ''It also solves the problem of avoiding interpretation of sources which is sailing closer to WP:NOR.