Hi Mdebellis.  Thank you for the help.  Please see Human Genome.  I welcome your interest.  At the same time, I was looking for something broader than one additional pair of eyes.  My intent was to broaden the editorial reviewing to anyone of an anthropological, historical, philosophical bent who knows about and is interested in identity and variation in biology (the genetic code metaphor, genotypes, genomes, etc.).  Currently, there are three intensely interested editors who share the same point of view on the subject but who have not been exposed to the idea of types in science.  Consequently, they think my contribution is "soapboxing" and/or original research.  While I have modified my contribution to make it more true to the sources cited, they do not think there is any connection between my paragraph and the sources cited.  People who know there is a large literature on the issue of the implications of the human genome concept will know that the idea of the human genome type is pretty well-known and not my creation.