Noting that it was hardly "vandalism." Any psuedo-intellectual can pretend he's some sort of PhD online and somehow use that to justify walls of ridiculous text. Not that you aren't a PhD, of course, but you can see how easy it would be to make something like that up. Also, this isn't a "Troll" it's just a look at a different point of view of how easy wikipedia's weaknesses are to exploit when anybody's claims to expertise can't be checked. Seriously, not a troll. Your opinion that this is a troll is welcome, but please have it objectively looked at before you start deleting things you don't like. Thanks!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.178.85.44