January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks,Nina, for your patience and common sense.It is sad that Nishidami and Tom believe this article is merely a long running exercise of their megalomania.
Take this recent gem from Nishi."The most accurate information is not necessarily just what two most recent authors say here. Wadsworth was summing up the state of the art for some 50 candidates, including de Vere in 1958." Where does Nishi get off claiming(a) that Wordsworth ever read the Bibliotheca Anti-Stratfordiana(the only source for the 49 authorship figure)and(b) then followed its references to fifty candidates(many confined to brief monographs or,sometimes,mere letters to the editor.I know.I spent three years of my spare time at Columbia doing exactly what Nishidami fantastically asserts that Wordsworth did  Does Wordsworth even claim to have based his work on  the Bibliotheca?  Certainly Nishi isn't.He and Tom didn't even cite it in their bibliography and I gave them most of a year before weighing in on this.
Nishidani has willfully invented numerous discussions involving conspiracy theory in places where it would have been physically impossible to print such and which he certainly
never attempted to read.Apologize,Nishi,confession is good for the soul.And promise us you are going to stop Tendentiously Editing.  23:23, 10