OK, sorry for the delay in responding properly.  From what I can tell, the bare facts of the matter are that you made edits to a number of LDS-related articles, and those edits were reverted by various editors, myself included.  Now, there are two main ways of viewing these facts: one, that your edits were consistent with Wikipedia policy and the editors who reverted them were not justified in doing so; two, that your edits were not consistent with Wikipedia policy and the other editors were justified in reverting them.  This is why I asked you about your understanding of Wikipedia policy  you are relatively new here, and despite your confidence that your edits were appropriate, my view of them was that they violated several policies and guidelines.  (It's natural for newcomers to take some time learning the ropes, so it doesn't imply any malice on your part.)  Since the heart of the conflict seems to be how you and I regard your edits in light of WP policy, it seems best to isolate the points of policy where our understanding differs, in hopes that we can establish areas of common ground from which we can work out other differences (or at least agree about what we irreconcilably disagree).  It would be helpful, though, to know that you've indeed read the pertinent policies, so that we can speak with the same lingo and refer to the same general ideas.  Have you done this?  Thanks,  /talk/