The anonymous edit warrior's later version looks okay to me. The sentence "The site contains many articles by contributers [sic] sympathetic to the paranormal and to Natasha." appears to capture the obvious bias of the site in question. – Besides, and I'm playing the devil's advocate here, if the statistical outcome of an investigation critically depends on whether you assume the subject at hand is bunk , it's no wonder that those who believe in this paranormal stuff see the investigation as a confirmation. – What's up with the asterisk in the External links section?