Disgusting==
This guy is a disgusting sex columnist. He revels in it. He does it on purpose, and it's what gives him and his column their edge. It seperates him from every other sex advice giver I've ever read  and it's his signature attitude, tone, and approach to the issues. But there seems to be no way to adduce this highly pertinent and relevant information without violating the lame, loose, sloppy, ill-thought-out NPOV rule. Hilariously (and disgustingly), people tell me providing this information violates article "neutrality." Any help here by any person of quality, integrity, and intelligence would be appreciated.  

==