Now, listen carefully, because I am only going to say this one more time: The argument that the Iraq Liberation Act was a violation of international law is your argument. You have provide me with absolutely no source from an expert in International law (i.e. Claudio Grossman) that will substantiate your claim that the Iraq Liberation Act was a violation of international law. 

 This is know as original research. Recognize!  16:07, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

I'm relieved this is the last time, I'm tiring of your broken record. I can assure you that the United Nations Charter is not original research.  19:04, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

 Application of the UN Charter to the Iraq Liberation Act is original research.  19:09, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

 It's not the application of. It's a very simple citation. International law is clear on this matter in the extreme. The UN Charter states, "The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members." The Act openly admits the intention of overthrowing Saddam, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power." There is, very simply, no room for interpretation.  20:15, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)