Bias in the Introduction 

The introduction's last line "Since he became the leader of the BNP several educational institutions have invited him to speak on political radicalism, multiculturalism, and BNP policy." is unweighted and does not at all represent the controversy, outcries, and actual uncommonness of the particular 'invites'. 

Also, where is the mention of Griffin's unquestionable notoriety? Are we trying to inform people about him in an encyclopedic sense (ie give a broad and unbiased picture of him that would actually be useful to someone), or make a safe unoffensive BNP-friendly article?

Please don't leave this to other people! I have already made a few unsucessful edits today - it only takes one committed person to revert you on Wikipedia, to make change impossible for any single editor to achieve. There is a 3RR revert rule, and admins are always ready to block users and lock articles when perceived 'edit wars' happen. Wikipedia needs people to jump in and have a go.