HighKing 
Re. this and this. To put it bluntly, you don't know what you're talking about Murry. First, the IP is not me logging out to edit. HighKing has more than one person who objects to his edits, and rightly so. And second, HighKing was specifically warned by Cailil not to use his own interpretation of sources in making policing edits like this, which is exactly what he did by altering a direct quote that no longer existed on a page to read something else based on what he read in the banner, which has nothing to do with the quote. That is not policy compliant either in letter or spirit. His only policy based options were to remove it, or change the citation to point to where he subsequently found it. He did neither. His alteration of the quote was wrong, and his editting of the page to reflect the current contents of the cite, while not wrong in of itself, falls squarely under Cailil's other warnings. As an aside, in claiming the original author is the person who breached MOSQUOTE, you seem to be assuming that the error in locating the cite for the quote was down to the original author. I see no reason why that should be. It's far more likely that it was moved after the original author used that page as the cite for it. At the end of the day Murry, you're not doing HighKing any favours by defending him in this manner, and in doing so, you might even find yourself under scrutiny from Cailil for engaging in the same behaviour. I suggest you read the entire extended discussion under "Removals of the term British Isles (again) on HighKing's talk page very carefully, lest you find yourself making the same errors in judgement he is making.