Footnotes reviewed 

OK, The references here were not nearly as bad as they were on the OWU main page, but they still need some attention-particularly around the Campus Crusade for Christ issue.  I personally do not like CCC, but unless you can provide better resources, then I question the inclusion in the section.  I do not believe this event, which appears to be isolated to the campus only, is notable. The article over is improving, but the article still has a fair amount of POV... and it has improved since being nominated for GAR.
 "[4]^ Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia. University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved on 2005-10-15." This link does not mention Thomson or Ohio.
"[5]  ^ The Methodist Movement Comes to America and Impacts Slavery. Reve' M. Pete. Retrieved on 2003-01-01." This is a personal website, therefore not a reliable one.
Branch Rickey doesn't belong in an article titled "Activism AT Ohio Welseyan University."  He might be usable in a separate section discussing the legacy or continuing activism of OWU students. But he does not work as examples of activism at OWU.
"[9]# ^ Mary King. Ohio Wesleyan University. Retrieved on 2006-12-07." Does not support the notion that Mary King worked with Martin Luther King or that she did so while a 'young student.'  Nor does the reference mention the SNCC.
"By February 1987, student political action had brought Ohio Wesleyan to pledge to fully divest holdings connected to South Africa. [16]" Are you sure about that date?  I started school in the fall of 87 and the schools involvement with apartheid was a huge issue until my junior year.  Apartheid and environmentalism were the two causes that stood out.
"[19]^ a b Local Groups. United for Peace and Justice. Retrieved on 2006-08-10." This is a list of local groups, but it doesn't mention anything about protest in front of the city hall.
"[25]^ a b [OWU Read this Column]. The Transcript. Retrieved on 2006-12-12." This is an opinion paper article written 3 years after the incident.  It is not a reliable source.
"[26]^ a b Dear Editor. Kelly Horstman, The Transcript. Retrieved on 2006-12-12." This is an opinion page of letter's to the editor written three years BEFORE the issue in question.
"[27] # ^ Colleges draw line on sidewalk chalk. CNN. Retrieved on 2006-12-03." This reference should be removed completely.  It was originally there to support an allegation that chalking was against the rules.  The article says the exact opposite of what was originally stated.  The wording has since been changed but this link remains.
"[23] # ^ McMurtrie, Beth. "Crusading for Christ, Amid Keg Parties and Secularism", Chronicle of Higher Education, May 18, 2005, p. A42." This article was written in 2001-not 2005.  Thus it is impossible for it to discuss events that occured in 2003.  Also, based upon the synopsis, this article does not support any of the allegations in this section.