"

 RfA commentary 

Strikerforce.  This is truly bizarre. I replied at Rami R's RfA where I made the point that your challenge was simply clueless - of course supporters are entitled to challenege opposers and it was simply odd to ask why anyone would not do that. Now, in the above, you tell me I'm implying bad faith; when indeed I'm only saying I might be acting in bad faith - I'm not implying anyone else is and a simple reading makes that very clear. It's not that complex mate, disapointed you can't see so. I've re-read my commentary and anyone with en-2 ~ en-3 would get that; as you don't mention your proficency I assume you're en-n so that makes it even more surreal.    Chat   "