Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell‎
Your work on this article reads thusly: 
 You've removed at least one rather extraordinarily reliable source.
 You've promised some sort of reference supporting your views.
 You've reverted the restoration of the reliable source.
 You've promised to explain your actions on the talk page but failed to follow up.

This gives every appearance of editing in bad faith. Please considering carefully your next edits to this article - or perhaps give up editing it entirely. The evidence against Stanley Meyer is overwhelming, and the article's history is as a "crank magnate." As an experienced editor, you really don't want to align yourself with bad science.