No, you reverted with the logic that the citation didn't meet FA standards. Guess what? FA isn't a binding policy on articles they can lose FA status, and they can regain it. If you don't like the content added, go ahead and improve it, but cut it the fuck out with the wholesale revisions under bullshit deceptive edit summaries. Your behavior does not evince collaboration but battleground mentality and article-ownership; and as an admin, you should really know better. betafive