Well I suggest you read that file again and turn your thinking cap on this time. I do not need a lecture about the 'meaning' of George Wrights actions from you. George Wright has destroyed the organization along with a couple of editors here, and others at Techinc Washing. I also think that your use of the term 'Technocracy fundamentalist movement' is ignorant and demeaning. I posit that you being a 'self styled expert' that bit off the whole thing, and has instantly digested it is a little comical. You are dead wrong in your appraisal. If anything those people are the ones that are more in the genre you are suggesting. Building church`s in a Technate ? Special Interest groups in a Technate. Kolzene wrote and edited much of the Q&A;, and according to wiki that is self generated original conclusion stuff then that is a form of 'advertising' and blog 'driving' to original conclusions. To say what they are doing is a movement is sad. There are two people their that self publish stuff, and have sucked in the unwary who do not stay long. 
Further more you imply that movement has made 'progress' over time and become more interesting and more representative of the current status of things. That is not true. Technocracy was thought out originally to a purpose by a handful of brilliant scientists. Your implication of fundamentalism is just plain 'stupid'. You say that you have not read the book for a while ?
Well I suggest you read the last two chapters with a view to opening your mind a little, and with a view to thinking about the design.  http://technocracy-incorporated.wikispaces.com/space/showimage/Technocracy%2520study%2520guide.pdf
Technocracy%20study%20guide.pdf  There were 200 to 300,000 people for a while that thought this was not only the way to go but worked toward that end. Now there are 4 people on the NET site and Two people on the TechCa site that claim they and their 'belief system' , reward and punishment, 'contract', and church building, and referendum Democracy voting voting is 'smart'
These people are ignorant. You sound ignorant now also. Technocracy is important. It deserves to be fairly brought out. As to your suggestion about what I can do, you suck, and so does the horse you road in on. Oh and I did not 'assault' anyone, I told the truth about George, and since when do you decide what is unacceptable ? You are an ignorant person, or perhaps a believer like them. You now lack credibility.  ( )