I believe this is a water tight, rational and fair challenge to those who keep deleting selective accusations while keeping those that have not been proven in the last 50 years. I think it is to do with one's nation's guilt; to render Japan culpable for Iraq will render for instance the United States or Australia to which those users belong in the same conspirators. You will win I guess, I doubt those users have any extensive knowledge of international law on the tests of sovereingty and Nuremburg precedents. To them, their concept of war crimes in a very lay and faux popular fasion is narrowly limited to as you said: death, physicial injury and physically induced mental injury. It extends greater than that to the realms of conspiracy of primary and secondary participants in the creation and exectution of aggressive policies, and suggested in obiter dictum, inchoate actions for the purpose of aggression.

 (Talk)