RE: RexxS: That wasn't what I said.  My concern is that Sasata has said, "It's pretty obvious I don't think it meets the criteria 3a (comprehensiveness), and it's also pretty obvious that we have different opinions about the comprehensiveness criterion. In its current state I would fail on that basis."  In agreeing with her opinon, do you agree with her statement about comprehensiveness?  My expertise and the reviewer's expertise in this field are not at issue; the issue is the misapplication of assessment criteria.  Such as issue is independent of the topic of the article