Ludvikus here: Are you, Lucaas, totally incapable of saying something nice about me at that "Kangeroo court"? *You do not care for me? Yes or no?
You do not think they can get that so-called "Community ban on me?" Yes or no"?
You want to be alone here, and you find me in the way? Yes or no"?
Do you think that I'm disruptive to the Community, whatever that means? "Yes or no?
Do you believe there is an Editor's War? Yes or no?
Do you want Peace? Yes or No?
Do you want to help FT2? Yes or no?
I'm still assuming Good Faith.
Now here's some PHILOSOPHY (it seems there's no alternative User:Quiddity but to shout it:
   "The history of philosophy is punctuated
   by revolts against the practices of previous
   philosophers and by attempts to transform 
   philosophy into a science—a discipline in 
   which universally recognized decision-
   procedures are available for testing phil-
   osophical theses.  In Descartes, in Kant, in
   Hegel, in Husserl, in Wittgenstein’s Trac-
   tatus, and again in Wittgenstein’s Phil-
   osophical Investigations, one finds the same
   disgust at the spectacle of philosophers 
   quarreling endlessly over the same issues.  
   The proposed remedy for this situation 
   typically consists in adopting a new 
   method: for example, the method of  “clear
   and distinct ideas” outlined in Descartes’
   Regulae, Kant’s “transcendental method,”
   Husserl’s “bracketing,” the early Wittgen-
   stein’s attempt to exhibit the meaningless-
   ness of traditional philosophical theses by 
   due attention to logical form, and the later
   Wittgenstein’s attempt to exhibit the point-
   lessness of these theses by diagnosing the 
   causes of their having being propounded.  
   In all of these revolts, the aim of the revo-
   lutionary is to replace opinion with knowl-
   edge, and to propose as the proper mean-
   ing of “philosophy” the accomplishment 
   of some finite task by applying a certain set
   of mythological directions.
   Linguistic Turn, Recent Essays in Philosophical Method
   ed. & intro. by Richard Rorty
Yours truly