First of all, where do you get the idea that one must be an "activist" in order to be pro-choice or to have a pro-choice position on some issue?  And where is the article edit where I ever said that RCOG is "activist"?  You seem to be making arguments against a person who does not exist, because I never edited any article to say that RCOG is "activist."

In the United States, a CNN poll asked the following question in May of 2007: "With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?"  45% said pro-choice and 50% said pro-life.  Do you seriously believe that those 50% are activists or consider themselves activists?  I certainly don't think that.  Those 50% are simply saying what their opinion is.

Regarding RCOG, they may well be "activist."  I don't know, and I don't see how that is the least bit relevant to whether they are "pro-choice" or whether they have taken a "pro-choice position" on some issue.  I suspect RCOG is "activist" on this issue, since they oppose reduction of abortion time limits.  That is a political position, and not merely a matter of complying with existing law.

And can't you see that I did not edit this article to say RCOG is a "pro-choice organization"?  I edited it to say that they have taken a "pro-choice position." Can't you see the difference, anymore?  You're the one who pointed out the difference in the first place.