"|25px|]] 05:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Caps
Thanks for your input on the Pump RE caps. Between your links, and other things I've seen, it seems that this might be a case where un-specified usage (eg 'first cap') is usually referring to a 'national' cap, while narrower usages are usually self-identified, ie 'first county cap', 'first school cap', etc.?  18:55, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Seems right to me, the unqualified is usually the international. It seems to date to 1880 for football  and be of cricket origin. Also . 00:02, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)

Probem editor  

Hi there. Just thought I'd get in touch regarding the above problem editor, who I notice seems to have recently targeted you for harrassment . I was made a target of harrassment, stalking and abuse by this editor late last year, and the matter even escalated to arbitration before being resolved in my favour. During an absence from Wikipedia of several months I have been contacted privately by several editors who claim to have been abused by  under similar circumstances to myself, so I'm currently exploring whether it may be worth iniating a formal disciplinary process to address 's history of inappropriate behaviour. Would you be willing to support such a process?  05:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bizarreness effect
I don't think this article is a speedy delete - which rules does it fit under? Perhaps you should list it on vfd instead.  | talk 20:22, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Someone seems to have zapped it. Though I though obvious nonsense was a good reason. 20:46, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)

 Cathedral names 

The usual policy to use common names for page titles: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names).   21:28, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It is policy to use the offical name not the names crtins like you want to use. If you revert my mods I will report you under 3rr. 21:30, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

No, the official policy is to use common names, not official names.  See link above. We don't have an article titled ""United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"". And no personal attacks, please.   21:32, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I regard your vandalising aof my mods as a personal attack. Who is this 'we' then. Wikipedia may or may not have article. I will correct the UK problem as soon as possible. 21:41, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

I have posted to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You may wish to post there as well.   21:43, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Jiunkrn Ireland???? Stop what you are doing or you will be blocked, and an RfC will be filed against you. This is your last warning.   21:49, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for what. I haven't broken any rules. It's you he needs to be banned. 21:54, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

Although it could be argued that your previous page moves were part of a naming dispute, that last move of United Kingdomedited United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to Jiunkrn Ireland  is clearcut page-move vandalism with no possible justification.   21:56, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Your mad. 21:59, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

You have a history of personal attacks (""cretins"" above, and I seem to remember you referring to Violetriga as ""Vile Riga"").  Remember that Wikipedia:No personal attacks is also official policy.   22:01, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Your mad and there is an RfC set up against you now. So any more comments by you should be dirrect there. Any here will be deleted. 22:04, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)

Re: your message on my talk page.  I am not threatening to use admin powers over the dispute over the cathedral page article titles.  I am threatening to use admin powers if you do clearcut pagemove vandalism like renaming United Kingdomedited United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to Jiunkrn Ireland, as you did.    22:09, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC