Good point! Which is why I long ago (it seems, i.e. earlier yesterday, as soon as I learned how) bowed to the formality of acquiring the Wikipedia-form permission. - Still, it'll be awhile, I hope, before sueing someone for using a Nobel-laureate's four-line obituary of Hitler will be publicity to "revel" in. Even Murdoch (jewish, sadly relevant in this case) might not want to appear "supporting" Hitler that way. Or maybe not, who knows, he might want that obituary suppressed from ever being quoted again. Better safe than sorry, I agree. I like following the guide-lines, but it was hard getting easy info on them, and unpleasant getting there. I bite back, sure - but only "back". On the issue itself, I cherish being as correct as only possible. Yet in the relevant case, copy for "educational purposes" would be validly claimed - until tried and determined otherwise. Better safe than sorry. Though there's always a limit to how little "risk" should, and can, be taken. No risk is never an option.