Thanks for your message.  Let me tell you why I was alerted to your edit as potential vandalism.  (1) It was from an anon IP.  Not a problem, but since accounts on Wikipedia are free and simple to set up, it's easy to avoid this.  (2)  There was no edit summary.  When hunting vandalism, blank edit summaries are an indicator of vandalism.  It's always a good idea to add an edit summary to explain to other editors what you've edited and why you edited it.  (3)  Adding your perspective, or indeed any perspective without citation is generally frowned upon.  All 'facts' should be backed up by verifiable sources.  Hope this explains why I reverted your edit.  Feel free to get back to me on this, or any other matter.  Cheers, and happy Christmas!