Bovine emissions and suspected Scibaby accounts
As far as I can see, this edit violated no policies.  I checked the source, which is reliable, and the edit appeared to be faithful to the source's information.  I understand that Scibaby had a fixation on bovine emissions threatening humanity, but you don't know for sure that it was a Scibaby account.  You apparently blocked the account because it had an interest in a subject that was the same as a banned editor.  Do you think that perhaps blocks in these types of situations should be handled by editors who aren't regular contributors to the Global Warming articles?