What it all boils down to is that those wishing to exclude NAMBLA from the LGBT organizations must explain how it is not gay-related to advocate repealing laws which criminalize sexual relationships between twenty-three-year-old males and fifteen- or sixteen-year-old males.

I realize NAMBLA was set specifically for males, but are they only argueing about age of consent being changed for men and boys only or are they arguing for "sexual freedom" all children.  The reason I want to clarify the age is because 15, or 16 year olds, in some us states already have some "age of consent rights.  So where does NAMBLA feel the cut off shoulf be.