{| border="0" style="float: right;"   
{| class="wikitable" style="float: right;" margin-left: 10px"
!style="background-color: LightGray" colspan="1;" |  Source and Use  
!style="background-color: LightGray" colspan="1;" |  Theoretical Potential        
!style="background-color: LightGray" colspan="1;" |  Technical Potential        
|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender" |Solar
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|3,850 ZJ Smil (2006), p. 12 
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|-
|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender"|Wind 
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|2.25 ZJ 
|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender"|Biomass
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|3.0 ZJ 
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|-
|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender"|Electricity (2005)
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|0.0567 ZJ  
|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender"|Primary energy use (2005)
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|-
|style = "background-color: Lavender" align="Center"|0.487 ZJ  
|-
+I spent a good deal of time today working on a table using the "table format" only to find that the wikitable format supports wrap around text. For some reason I thought this wasn't the case. Anyways, I do plan to rework the table with columns labelled theoretical potential and technical potential. This type of table should clear up the apples to oranges comparison conflict between energy use and theoretical availability. Here is the table so far. I need to add Hydro to the table as this is an indirect solar resource. Any other ideas?