Hello, I tagged your article as having point-of-view problems because its phrasing is overly promotional. For example,  is highly promotional. It could be better phrased as something like  This has another benefit of being more concise. (Of course, that particular rewrite only applies if it is true!)
I added the "sources needed" tag because much of the information in the article is unsourced. Wikipedia's policy is that all articles need reliable sources to back up the claims made, and there are whole paragraphs in your article that are unreferenced. One final note to make is that adding external links in the body of the article is normally seen to be a sign of advertising, and all those links to the individual charities are unneeded. It would be better to add a reference for each one.
I'm always happy to help, and I don't mind taking a look over your article again after you clean up the issues. Thanks for the encouragement about the adminship! Cheers!