connection between 4chan and anonymous and anonymous culture 

I'm not sure the extended section on 4chan users is really necessary in this article.  Here's my formal sounding original reasoning that I thought started sounding too formal:

As it stands, the lines drawn between those three things are rather thin.  While Anonymous does profit from Anonymity, and 4chan users can profit from anonymity, I think there needs to be a more direct connection shown in this article before there needs to be an extended section upon 4chan within the article.  Consider it like this:

My father doesn't like potatoes.  Turnip eaters often don't like potatoes.  My father must eat turnips.
Anonymous profits from anonymity.  4chan users profit from anonymity.  Anonomous members must be 4chan members.

I don't doubt that there are many participants in Anonymous that use 4chan, I'm just not sure it is relevant to the point of extended discussion of Anonymous unless' there is proof that 4chan was the main location where Anonymous was organized.  There have been several sites akin to 4chan both preceding and following, and in addition IRC also served as a gathering place for anonymous individuals to share information collectively - including early hackers.  A discussion of 4chan as a subset of anonymous culture should be listed on cyberculture and 4chan and if necessary on a new page dedicated to anonymous(culture).  This article purports to be about Anonymous as a loosely associated hacktivist group - the focus, thus, should be on Anonymous(group)