I've done my best to stay above/out of the fray, but it's time to point out that this whole thread (nay, this whole talk page) reeks of a few editors who seem more intent on interpreting sources and advocating a viewpoint.  Certainly these fringe assertions regarding finances are generally accepted (or even acknowledged as legitimate concerns) by reliable sources or the general public.  Over the last twenty years there have been so few sources that one can count them on one hand, which doesn't even come close to meeting due weight for inclusion.  The length to which editors are attempting to wrangle policy and link sources to "prove" a point is absolutely shameful.  //Blaxthos ( t / c )