"

I disagree that she edits without pushing her own POV, if she desn't like content either because she doesn't understand it, the significance of it or the rational for using it she deletes it; see this talk page, Talk:West Coastway Line#‎Distances between stations part two, for an example of her actions. ( )

Lucy-marie replied on my own talk page, the following is her message and my reply;

[Lucy-marie]
If you personally dislike the award given to me please take it up with the person who awarded the barnstar and not myself. thank you. I also hope this overblown thing can pass on without too much hassel. I have decided to apologies fro the edits whihc caused the instigation but it may just push people away from talking about their edits if they get such as hostile response to the ""cosy concensus"". 

[My Reply]
This discussion was started on your talk page, please reply on your talk page and not elsewhere, this is common decency as others might be following the debate there and not where ever - thus I will be copying your reply to me and this reply to your own talk page.
Now to the questions you raise;
I have no need to complain to who ever placed the 'award' on your page as I'm not concerned with their action but your own, if the 'award' had not been present I would still have raised your edit style on you talk page, doing so is a way of informally pointing out to you (and others) that you might need to look at your action, rather than making any complaint official.
Now for the reason (in my opinion) you cause the decent you do: It's because of your style, not why you edit (or indeed what you edit), you think you are right and everyone else is wrong, even when the consensus or the facts shows otherwise - you might not like the ""cozy consensus"", as you put it, but in a democracy that is how it works, if you don't like that simple fact of life Wikipedia is probably not for you. Buy yourself some web space, learn some HTML/PHP, then you can publish ""The facts according to Lucy-marie"" to your harts content... ( )

( )

Does it really matter where a debate takes place? Also everybody has a right to hold a valid opinion here and each person does. I also loath your comments about ""the facts according to Lucy-marie"" bit as I could interprit that as you thinking you are allways right and I am allways wrong in your opionion. I shall take it that as you are an ""older"" editor you and your ""life experience"" as some may put it would entitle you to that opinion, I however disagree. I Think we should all move on and I hope never to have the displeasure of running in to you again. I shall stay well away from your beloved train articles and shall edit other parts of wikipedia and retain my opinions to myself, hated meeting you. 

""Does it really matter where a debate takes place?"" Of course it does, if for no other reason that it keeps all the comments in one place, it also means that people who might be monitoring what is being said (for what ever reason) knows that the discussion is continuing - if it goes quite on a talk page has the discussion finished or has it scooted off elsewhere... ( )

Sockpuppetry case
 
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to  for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —   (talk to me!) 

There is some fairly compelling evidence presented that ''' Talk 

 Holiday 

 Blocked for sockpuppetry 

{