You will get abuses when brimming with half-baked knowledge you put inaccuracies into articles. 
Have you tried to fathom why reactions to you are "harsh" ? Because it is irritating to be taught about your own history from a European, who has never set foot in the country, and whose knowledge about India has been gleaned only from glossy magazines and a couple of Max muller books.

Some examples from you are, "Dharmic religions are not interrelated", or calling Sanskrit a subcontinental language. A few months ago you did not know that RigVeda is a canonical text of Hindus (or something similar to that effect). Those whom you call ideologists are actually those who stay here and know more than you. A University degree in Sanskrit or Oriental studies is useless unless one experiences the ethos of a nation. Ask [Tully]. He probably does not know about Mandalas and Kandas, but he has his fundamentals right.