"

 faithless of debate egad o damn 

Discography
We should be able to come up with a definitive list of commercially released albums and singles. Let's start with the headings. 

Officially Released
Self Released
Singles
Out of Print Compilations
In Print Compilations

Those should be in sentence case. Do folks agree on those headings? - 

 I think those sound reasonable. I have changed them to sentence case, and re-added the record covers which were deleted from the discography by Jonah. I also re added the descriptions of Rose's musical style that were deleted without explanation. Finally I re-incorporated a new version of the sentence dealing with racism and antisemitism. It makes not direct claims about Rose's online work, only that it deals with race and religion. Then I wrote that this has created a series of accusations of racism and antisemitism in various online chat groups. While online chat groups are not officially a source, the fact remains that these criticisms are out there, posted in various places. I think that this should satisfy both SP (by being NPOV) and Ayers (by bringing up the issue).  Hope this helps. I agree with Will, let's move on.  

I do wonder at the designations of ""self-released"" vs. ""officially released."" At what point does one become the other? ""Bone Again"" and ""Elizabethan Period"" were funded by people or companies other than Biff, and given professional print runs of a few to several thousand; they were distributed through non-internet indie channels, and reviewed in Mojo magazine.  ""Roast Beef"" was pressed using Biff's royalties, but then it was picked up by a distributor who slapped their own record label's sticker on the cover; several thousand were produced and sold.  ""Hamburger Blues"" was an ""official"" release that may have been a smaller print run than some of Biff's website releases.  ""Uncle Jesus"" was a major label album that is harder to find than ""Roast Beef."" ""The Pickwick album was an ""offical"" compilation of far seedier origin than some of the indie releases.  The whole issue of ""in print"" vs. ""out of print"" is a bit difficult to assess as well.  If copies are sealed, stockpiled and available, isn't the album still ""in print""?

My concern with these categories is that they tend to appear at the same times that text changes are made diminishing Biff's accomplishments; and they seem to be included as part of the intent of that effort.  If you look at other artists' discographies, these distinctions are rarely made.  For example, see Sun_Ra.  A great many of Sun Ra's albums were self-released, including most of the artistic milestones.  It is a vague and misleading designation.  Why not go for straight chronology?

And to confirm Marcuse's interpretation, I was not implying that Marcuse initiated a given edit.  Is someone trying to start fights where they ain't?   

The problem here is that you wrote something, a line that went unsingned, but on closer inspection was found to be added by you but attributed by you to someone esle. You then followed this by saying that you agreed with the line. Very unwiki of you.

Indeed, someone is trying to start fights where they ain't.   

 Wallawe/Jonah, I'm curious what the ""released on cdr"" that you keep adding to the discography means? What is cdr? As far as the self vs. officially why don't we just simply put ""Full length releases"" and combine them?  

In most of these cases ""cdr"" is not an accurate designation.  Some of them were glass-mastered CDs.  But as I said above, I don't think that's too important, anyway.  

, you claimed to revert back to Marcuse, but you did not.  That's a super-misleading tag.  

And now I understand what you are referring to:  .  That's something I do a lot.  It's called ""Paragraphs.""  Here, I'll do one right now.  Here goes....

The first paragraph was one sentence long and  went: ""Judiasm is targeted"" is a really problematic phrase.  

Then, as I had an additional comment on a different topic, I skipped a line, kept the same indent, and continued.  I assumed that someone with a minimal level of int