"

Pink Floyd
Hi Murrey, The Australian Pink Floyd are recognized my Pink Floyd and David Gilmour had them play at his Birthday party. I agree tribute acts are in many cases just ""tributes"" but The Australian Pink Floyd are much bigger than other tribute bands in the world today. Queen have their own tribute show called ""Queen Extravaganza"" too.
Maybe is this was worded correctly, could I get your support?

How about
""Pink Floyd courted The Australian Pink Floyd to play a concert at David Gilmour's 50th Birthday party. They since went on to become the most successful tribute show to any original act.""  — Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)  

Sorry John, its just a tribute act, yes Gilmour had them play at his birthday and maybe they are good, but do they relly warrant a mention in the influences and awards setion? No. They have there own article on wiki, but as a stand alone block qoute in the Floyd article, sorry bud, tryto angle it in to another section, which might be more appropriate.   

 Thanks Murrey, I'll give that a go.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.175.71.191   

Thanks...
... for catching this, Murry. Just assumed it was the usual POV vandalism. That'll teach me not to click on the article first. Cheers, — ॐ 
No problem Jon, I only realised when I clicked on the link and was redirected. Maybe someone with a good knowledge of Northern Irish music might try to write an artcile someday and then we would have somewhere to link it to. But to my limited knowledge in the area, there isnt much difference between it and music on the rest of the island (like so many other things).   

A brownie for you!
{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;""
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" | 
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" | Thanks your reverting the vandalism on my User page. ' (talk • contribs • logs) 
|}
Thanks Callenec,  it was no problem.   

 Ambiguity 

Hey Murry,

Firstly, ""unambiguous"" was what I was going for in my edit summary - not ""inambiguous""! Probably a typo!

Anyway, thank you for your second edit summary, in which you corrected from 'vandalism' to 'good faith': much appreciated. )

On to the matter itself: Ireland is an island. It is also a name by which the governing authority refers to itself as. However, this causes a conflict. As a person who apparently holds logic in high esteem, I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. It is not clear, to many people throughout the world, what is meant by ""Ireland"". Unless you are from there (and even then, there can often be confusion), usually the context is not''''' understood. I think in this case, whereby the subject of education is a governmental and state-specific, and whereby the system does not concern a wider jurisdiction of the whole of the island of Ireland, the more unambiguous title should be given to the country.

Otherwise, people (mostly people not from that region of the world) will make an incorrect assumption. A link to the more relevant article is not enough: I doubt most people would hover their mouse over the link or click on it to find out what ""Ireland"" is. After all, most people (think they) know, right? 173.93.239.247  

Cheers thanks for the message, but the list is of states, not islands or geographic regions, if the list combined these then yes there would be a need to do thi