*:well... now that I look at the article more closely I can at least see where this movereq is coming from, and it's not as tendentious as I thought. This article is a mess... I still don't support renaming it though, as the "provide a worldwide view" within this article is a mistake. As I mentioned above there are plenty of articles that can and should provide a worldwide view of Gun control issues, but the subject of this article is a US centric subject and should be re-factored in order to be presented as such. Rather then worrying about the name just get to work copy editing the article.
You seem to be arguing that there should be an article split, one article for the global and a split out article for the USA centric views.  Right?  If so, the problem still remains that the title of the global half of the split should have a global viewpoint.  And, the "keep and" portion of the article title (taken from the US Bill of Rights) is decidedly USA centric.  Explain how "keep and" is global.    
Or perhaps the article could take an approach as describing purely the concept of RKBA, and maybe the cultures and/nations where it exists, and other subjects as necessary (although I suspect the same debates will come up in those areas).  Perhaps altering the general approach and method of the article could be an alternative to renaming/moving it.  I'd be willing to give it a shot if everyone else would.