Discussion of Censorship in this section
If editors wish to rely upon policy to censor - do not choose only the bits that you need to manipulate the discussion to form a directed conclusion.

First: the policy that was mis-quoted here on this page applied to Harrassment:

It required an un-involved administrator to invoke. You are clearly not.

Second: the community explicitly rejected censorship of records in the public domain. There was no consensus found to censor such knowledge from our encyclopedia readers. "No consensus found" = rejected idea.

Third: The correspondence is unequivocally, irrevocably and famously in the public domain and is clearly allowed by the arbcom editing principle referred to above.

In short, the policy quoted does not apply - as one can clearly see from the distinctions made regarding on-wiki harassment and the rejected proposal, and secondly as an involved editor in the subject ... it is not your place.99.141.241.135