Hi. Not at hand, unfortunately. I am in agreement with the basic idea of calling the priestess Pythia and the article accordingly. I was just trying to point out some known references. Smith, even though he's from 1870 is used a lot. As long as the old article re-directs to the new Pythia article, I think all is well. I will look when I can for a more current reference. I guess someone has checked out the Oxford Classical Dictionary already. yes, I know the bit about Pausanias. Thanks. - (Bob)