I don't know about logic, but policy will (hopefully). As Fæ says, having multiple, well-sourced viewpoints in the article is fine.  Removing references that you don't like because you only hold to one perspective is, of course, unacceptable.  I've blocked Alan347 for 31 hours for repeatedly violating this policy.  Now, maybe there's something "wrong" with those references, I don't know.  Maybe they're not WP:RS, or WP:DUE, or something else, and I have no problem with Alan347 or anyone else discussing that issue here (or at a relevant noticeboard), and maybe eventually consensus will agree to remove them.  But edit warring to push a POV...not so good.   So, you know, play nice, everyone.