I was not "edit-warring" with you. I was DISAGREEING WITH YOU. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.  

I was not "edit-warring" with you. I was DISAGREEING WITH YOU. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.

Let me teach you: edit-warring is when an editor repeatedly reverts to put his or her edit in the article. 

You and I NEVER got near ANY article page!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So, if we were not putting content into an article, how in hell could we be edit-warring??????????????????? You are being very, very silly. We are disagreeing on something. We are not edit-warring about putting content into an article. How long have you been on Wikipedia???????? Obviously, you think threatening me with "EDIT-WARRINGB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" will prove you right. No, you are wrong: we are not edit-warring about content in an article. You simply do not want to hear a different opinion. Don´t be ashamed of that. That is very normal in normal life and also here on Wikipedia. 99.999% of the people you will deal with in the world and here on Wikipedia are not interested in a different opinion. You and they think you are always 100% right in whatever you say and do. That is normal. So, don´t be ashame~d. You are being perfectly normal here on Wikipedia accusing me of edit-warring when I am not even adding content to an article. I am not edit-warring. You are being very silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1