many sikhs belong to this sect of sikhism , his name is vanit singh nalwa a completely anti-hindu-http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ULhgNexD92QC&pg;=PA228&dq;=hair+singh+nalwa&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=T30hT8ANiuesB6GunMUI&ved;=0CDwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q;=hair%20singh%20nalwa&f;=false

read this book and you will think as if only one general of India was great all others are useless,  look i appreciate sikhs their courage , resistance but their is a thin line between appreciation and exaggeration all the other neutral historians give completely different picture most historians regard both the diwan misr chand and mohkam chand as better general than hari singh nalwa but his "PERSONAL RELIGION AND SUBCASTE" made him blind , most of sikh empire was captured by these two punjabi khatri(hindu) and not sikhs but sikhs try to take the "BENEFIT BY USING PUNJABI AS A TERM" this hides the religion of the generals.

In short plz keep appreciation away from history by writing "hari singh led armies into kashmir" you are taking away credit of hindu general who was then commander in chief of sikh armies diwan misr chand. Maharaja ranit singh son kharak singh was also their as titular head the real command was in diwan's hand. Give Hari Singh Nalwa the pride of his share of achievements and dont snatch the glory of other generals just because they are "HINDU".122.161.78.118