June 2010 (UTC)

Flori does not say that all contemporary historians say that Richard was homosexual.  What Flori says is (my translation) "This [Richard's homosexuality] is however quite generally accepted at present by contemporary historians, in line with fashion" (the French original is "Celle-ci est pourtant assez généralement acceptée aujourd'hui par les historiens contemporains, la mode aidant").  Flori provides a footnote for this statement, with references to several authors. Since this article very carefully documents its sources, with citations to specific pages, it still seems to that the text in the article should correspond to the citation.  Gillingham says that the other historians are wrong, Flori disagrees with Gillingham.  Your are correct to note that the text was ambigous, I have now corrected it.  12:28, 13