Your latest edits have goen even further towards a Christian POV of the article. For an article on the historicity of Jesus, see that article. This article is not about historicity at all, but you've just gone and made edits that make it seem like it is. And plus, you've dramatically changed what the sources are saying. 
You see, what you guys don't seem to understand is that 

"The term Historical Jesus refers to scholarly reconstructions of the life of Jesus of Nazareth,[3][4][5"

Is not the same as 

"The term Historical Jesus refers to scholarly reconstructions of portraits of the life of Jesus of Nazareth.[3][4][5]"

To go out and dramatically change what the sources are saying is probably a gross misrepresentation of those sources.