"

 GA Fail 

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:  
 
B. MoS compliance: 
 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:  
 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
 
C. No original research: 
 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:  
 
B. Focused: 
 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
 
Is it stable?
 No edit wars, etc: 
 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
 {{#if:Some spots could be improved aesthetically with some additional images. How about a pic of Ernest Hemingway, for example?|Some spots could be improved aesthetically with some additional images. How about a pic of Ernest Hemingway, for example?|}}
Overall: 
Pass or Fail: 
 {{#if:Very close, but the writing style needs some more work. I plan on doing a comprehensive review/copyedit straightaway. –  • Tok |Very close, but the writing style needs some more work. I plan on doing a comprehensive review/copyedit straightaway. –  • Tok |}}"