"

The user Labongo attempts to distort the truth the following way

User Labongo states:  ""your requests for references have been answered hundreds of times.""

Notice, how again you present a hopelessly goofy claim, user Labongo.  Can you show us one such occasion where what we have been after has been offered to us, in terms of quotes and the related page informaiton ?

No one has asked as an attachment for the Kven text a list of references which disagree with the information offered.  This is the absurd case now.

We need to see where exactly those offered sources agree with the written text offered in the Kven article.  Those sort of pinpointed and exact - easily verifiable (as Mr. Mikkalai wants) - quotes and sources are offered in several key points of the Diki Wiki's text.  For us to ask you to understand the difference in that approach is too much to hope for, it appears.  

You appear to be too young for this sort of conversation, it seems safe to state.  

In the case of user Driakko's text that sort of showing of exact book and page information and - importantly user Labongo - exact quotes on those pages from known and credited historians and/or other scientist cannot be provided.

Read the bold text from the above sentence.  That is what is wanted, not what you claim that has been requested !  Please, read what our messages exactly say.  After you have done that, please stop setting words in the mouths of others, and particularly in the mouths of historians in relation to the Kven text. 

Perhaps just for you - and the types of you - it is important to repeat yet one more time:  We have never asked - and we are not asking now, and we shall not ask in the future - a list of related books an/or historians who have written about the topic.  Instead, we are asking for it to be pointed out where exactly those given sources agree with text pushed for Wikipedia.

We are familiar with the sources offered.  They appear to disagree with the text of user Drieakko !

What part of the word ""disagree"" do you find hard to understand ?

 

Torne Valley, Northern Norway and today's Kainuu were all part of Kvenland

Torne Valley, the extreme Northern Norway and today's Kainuu were all part of Kvenland.  That is why the languages and accents spoken in those areas at the present day are so closely related to each others.

This is not - and was not - changed considerably by the fact that migration to the historic Kvenland areas from the modern-day areas of Häme and Savo in Finland took place.  

As in other cases of migration usually, the newcomers acquire the language and/or the accent of the locals, not the other way around.  - -  

Diki Wiki text must remain the starting point for any changes/additions requested

Someone above (Drieakko/(Labongo) offered us a source which - according to them -  was ""written by someone"".  They added, that this shoud satify the need for the requested sources by Steve Wondering (and others).  However, a source ""written by someone"" does not point to a reliable source which Mr. Mikkalai and us others have been after.  Please, do not offer something as ridiculous as that for a reference !

We suggest that you do as was agreed and concluded in the wide consensus reached by all participants of this forum during April and May (also in early June) of this year.  No changes in the ""Diki Wiki"" Kven article can be made without proper and detailed references !  That text must be the starting point for any discussions.

Please, do not forget to provide the exact quotes and page numbers of the sources offered for any requested change or addition for the Diki Wiki's Kven text !  You are expected to suggest such possible changes and/or to discuss the content of the Diki Wiki Kven text on this discussion page.  - -  

User Leifern keeps on deleting discussion comments

User Leifern:  Do not resort to deleting comments from this or any other discussion pages.  The ""history pages"" reveal that you have done this sort of vandalism in the past as well.

Among others, you have deleted a number of comments from this discussion page from May and June this year.  Those comments - as well as you related deletions - clearly prove your vandal acts which fight against the nature and the rules of Wikipedia.

Please realize that the current and the past Kvens represent a one and the same g