Just because an article mentions (and cites) that the subject is controversial, does NOT mean it should be deleted. As a matter of fact, most wikipedia articles do mention anything controversial about the article. It is people who delete these sections that have a bias and an opinion, such as yourself....as if you don't want people to know that there is a controversy. That is against wikipedia's neutrality policy. This is very obvious with your recent edits to the BRIT MILAH page. On your discussion page it says that you are interested in JUDAISM, which means you probably have a bias. INTACTIVISM is actually in the Oxford AND Webster's dictionary as the fight to end circumcision. For you to say there are no sources is ridiculous. There are THOUSANDS of organizations around the world dedicated to ending male AND FEMALE circumcision. Of course, since you are "interested" in Judaism I don't expect you to stop editting BRIT MILAH the way YOU want it to be anyway so I give up. Just know that "we" are not stupid and people who read Wikipedia want all the info they can get, not just YOUR opinions. 75.1.48.21