Tell someone who cares, Fair Deal. =) Wikipedia isn't a place where people with more push can bully their way to the top of the pyramid. I've been told by non-Wiki Libs mods again and again that sources should be added to verify additions. You're negating the entire definition of positive research what you're saying, as I have stated civilly... you ADD sources to prove something. I was not aware that an encyclopedia was invented just to disprove rumors and heresy. 

As early as November, Elizabeth Bathory confirmed that unless no sources for hard rock were added, it wasn't going to be added. And that was the end of it. Then Wiki Libs comes back around April and starts firing up the whole debate again out of his own amusement, after a resolution had been reached. I am unable to understand why Megadeth's mainstream discography can't be labeled as just primarily heavy metal. NWOBHM bands, which Megadeth has a major amount of influence from, are just generally labeled as "heavy metal", so why not Megadeth? A handful of radio-friendly songs from Risk and maybe Cryptic Writings do not justify the entire rehaul of Megadeth's genre.