29 August 2006 
wow. i understand that the sentance I "added" was not crucial and really does not change the content. But what is this?! has the community not gotten smaller? was it not caused by the automobile? have I not sourced the statement as asked? is it not a fact? is it not information? does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was? is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present? is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not? if so it should be noted that I simply re-added the information after it was removed. was not the removal frivilous and unwarranted? what is the problem? why insist on the absence of this statement? it is unjustifiable. it is negligible. I am re adding the information as it is: A)factual, B) sourced, and C) informative. I assume that since there is no reason to remove it again (or in the first place) that you and all other Wiki Nazis will relax. If you are concerned with useless edits please see the edit fom the 26th. I know it was carried out by the great infallable Mindmatrix but imho that was the first useless change.