"needed, and the Minor char. one would fail notability. As for the other three, Edward and Bella fit WP:N. Jacob...I didn't merge because he's considered one of the main love-triangle characters and there's a possiblity that more info. will be available. If nothing comes up, the page will end up merged eventually. Right now, no one has really attempted to clean up the articles, but they are not in really bad shape compared to others. Bella Swan has a nice sized concept/creation section and a large reception section. Edward Cullen (Twilight), though lacking concept/creation and reception notes, has a large Film Portrayal secrtion. Jacob Black really needs work, though. Personally, I'd like people to work on the actual list. It needs reception and concept/creation notes, not to mention referencing from books and dialogue.   

Nah, I don't think so. Stephenie Meyer realistically spends too much time writing about how gorgeous Edward looks (seriously), and even if she had described her characters in more detail, all the character articles would be classified as stubs. There's really no need for so many stubs when we can condense them all into fewer pages.   

 The Olympic Coven 

In the back of Breaking Dawn, where notes on all mentioned covens are writen, the Cullens' information is under 'Olympic Coven' should this be mentioned anywhere?   

 Delete ""if published"" (paragraph 2, sentence 2) 

Go to ""June 2008 Update""  —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)  

Meyer announced that the book was on hold after that June update, in August 2008.  (talk) 

 Criticism 

Would this be a valid source for criticism? blastmagazine.com

The columnist analyzes the Twilight series and calls into question the books' overall writing issues, story and character development, and controversies in how it presents gender roles and how those could negatively affect the young fanbase. I know the source is a blog, but if the writer (Kellen Rice) had credentials that made her article valid, would it be a good source? I can't seem to find her credentials, though, so any help would be appreciated.   

 Twilight explicitly described as 'porn' 

 

Something to the effect of the frequently surfacing description of Twilight as ""softcore porn"", ""girl porn"", and similar should be added to the section on critical reception. 78.34.180.107  

I disagree that the opinion of one person who writes for a school newspaper is worth noting.  (talk) 

And I presume you're googling your fingertips off trying to find another source for the claim. 78.34.132.44  

 Harry Potter versus Twilight 

A passionate debate has raged online and in many teen circles about which is the ""better"" fantasy book series: Harry Potter or Twilight. Team Read, an after-school literacy program in Seattle, recently conducted a student debate where two teams hashed it out. Afterward, a panel of judges and the standing-room-only audience voted 120-40 that the Harry Potter had won the debate. In a separate vote not related to the deba