I think it's naive to believe that every nonprofit board would see it that way.  I also think it is naive to presume that I do not know that there are differences - especially since my IRL job right now literally is doing public communications for a large nonprofit organization.  )  Please refrain from making it personal - it can go both ways.  JSTOR has a relationship with many entities which have done tributes to Aaron.  Unless you speak for JSTOR, I see no reason to be swayed by this argument.  As I said before, there are many reasons to object to this idea, saying that it might upset JSTOR seems like a poor one to focus on.  I think saying that Wikimedia may not want to be seen as endorsing any kind of digital theft is a stronger argument to make.  While I do not personally believe that is an accurate interpretation of what happened, it is a far more compelling argument than "we do not want to upset people giving us free things."   ()