Yey, Narking! I know how historians operate very well. But facts are, they use a 200 year old estimate (which is at least as biased as imperial Russian estimates). Not neutral research, archival research. Do you comprehend this? Or not? 

PS. Why do you think Historyofwar uses an imperial Russian figure? Because it doesn't fit your view of reality? Learn to respect other, superior sources. 

PPS. Only Swedes and Finns use Swedish bias sources. As you clearly see, neutral English quality sources use neutral figures (like the one at historyofwar).