The article on Rajini mention his real name and I am holding the article here to the same standards, just like what you;ve done with your other edits for native names.  Where is the proof or the sources that explain his name is Seeman  or the " supplementary information of its origin" and that his first name is NOT Sebastian that is different from those that mention his first name is Sebastian? Again why does adding a surname to a name make it different leave alone defame the person?  What is so defamatory about the name Sebastian?  Why is one article from a website more credible than the other?  Please explain what I have interpreted/alleged in the main article on display?  I am merely adding a person's surname name from sources.  Why is a person's name subjective information?
I am not questioning "Seemans effect on congress" for what the section says but I am just asking where the substantiation/sources for the contents in this section is coming from that you see it to be credible enough to be there that is absent in other sources.  Where is the original research and the supplementary information that is absent from the sources that I've included that is present in these articles?  Please explain so I can provide them.
And again what is so defamatory about mentioning he has a brother?  I've quoted multiple sources here, are there sources that mention he doesnt have a brother? What was that removed?