Response to ARRE
1. Neutrality according to WP is presenting facts in such a fashion that both sides accept. "Occupied" isn't accepted by one side, "Moroccan" isn't accepted by the other side. "Controlled" is accepted by the both sides, that's why it's used in Minurso reports. Occuracy is relative. Neutrality isn't. 
3. I read and re-read your quote, it says half stayed in WS and half feld. I don't know why you don't see it.
4. What about "demonstrations for independence prove that there exists a pro-independence feeling among some Sahrawis in the territory", It's really neutral and pricize.
8. I will start counting, back to you.
9. What you are saying is your interpretation of the HR reports, I respect your opinion. My opinion is completely different, I say that HR was repressed in the whole Morocco. I say that there is 70 or more "disappeared" but there is also 200 000 (Minus 70 or more) Sahrawis who are living in Moroccan controlled parts of WS and in Morocco proper without any problem. If you want to reword the sentence give me a suggestion.
12. "Most of" to describe Algeria Tunisia and Morocco (not including WS and north Morocco) VS Lybia, Egypt, north Morocco and WS is a little bit unprecize.
13. The sentence should be reworded to highlight tribal system of Sahrawis. I wonder if Sahrawis was always spurning Centralist powers as they was in the origin of many Dynasties in Morocco?
 I see that we agreed upon some points. Can you make the changes in the text and let's see what it gives? And I'm still waiting your greeting card in the occasion of the end of Ramadan by Email, ) Salam ;)  .