Like I said, there is nothing more to talk about with him.  Even if he writes another faux self-composed, condescending and insolent reply, with a "shit-eating grin" about my situation and the fact that he is now free to do what he wants, sans-scrutiny from the Wikipedia Administration, as the "injured party" behind that computer screen of his, I'm not going to communicate with him ever again.  I really don't take this personal.  If you don't like my matter-of-fact statements about the treachery displayed by others, but would like to prosecute my own impropriety of "political correctness", I do not care.  You basically revealed what bothered you the most, is the criticism of inappropriate behaviour.  That comment I made to him, therefore now applies to you.  This is not emotional for me, but you did in fact, "walk in" to that situation, not wanting to deal with the drama and think it will just go away, but you apparently did take this personally.  You were already thinking that the disciplinary function of a block might have been too much.  Well, isn't that the truth?  I still don't request a lift of the block.  If you don't like my attitude, can go ahead and make it an indefinite block.  There's really no difference and I have nothing to lose, with an Administration that does not take its own responsibilities seriously enough.  I have read the guidelines and it is rare that they are enforced for all parties in a editorial dispute.  No harm done, no feelings hurt.  Well now, who cares about Wikipedia anyways?