The "pro-Israel" side does have tons of "propaganda". Unfortunately, it's only that> propaganda. If you can find a single historian (let me specify a bit here: an academic who's work has received real positive peer reviews, not just raves in the NYT or wherever else) that refutes the current academic narrative (as presented by Mr. Pitchford above), feel free to include it. Cheers,  

As for the debate by proxy, I would then suggest we clearly gather such quotes in a special section, similar to the Holocaust denial section in the Holocaust article. This is meant neither as a joke nor a provocation, but as a comparison about how to treat information diametrically opposed to the accepted academic narrative. Cheers,