Thank you for the apology , obviously I was offended and I lost my cool. I apologize for calling you liar, slamming your beliefs, and to all who've read this.  It won't happen again. 

I have legitimate policy related concerns about that entry as a whole. While my concerns are legitimate. I've failed repeatedly at communicating my intent. In the future I will use appropriate procedures to rectify them if they can't be worked out. Thank you again for being the bigger person. Hopefully we can work together to keep our exchanges constructive and find common ground.  

To be clear about my beliefs, please realize that there is third side to this conspiracy 'coin'.  I am on the third side of the coin.  It is the side of this argument who can look at the facts, sources, evidence, and context and see that both the claims of chemtrail theorists and those of the counter-theorist are dubious. None of this can be done if the terminology is not precisely defined.  My personal opinion is (and I have a degree in this field) is that we have the paranoid-delusional theorists arguing with the regular-delusional counter-theorists.  

Let us step back and neutrally state the facts.  If you are on one of the other sides of 'the coin', we need to talk about POV. The topic of my research CBW is difficult to approach without those one the other sides of this 'coin' accusing my of being on the opposing side.  I am afraid to state the known historical facts because but each side believes my idea is the POV of the other. To keep the entry neutral, the nuts point of view needs to be defined, dissected, and dismissed however, I am concerned that both sides are nuts. Please consider this when reading my posts, reviewing my edits, or reverting.  I am no chemtrail theorist and am (highly) offended by such accusations. I support neither claim.  

Let us differentiate the has happened from what is happening. This topic cannot be approached with out it. Thank you for letting me set the record strait.