You say that There is no whatsoever evidence that QAC was ever involved in institutional accreditation. But not far above, you say that I assume you are aware that QAC UK Limited has closed in 2010 and the new QAC registered in 2011 is engage in higher education programme accreditation not institutional accreditation like QAC UK Limited. The latter implies to me that QAC was involved in institutional "accreditation". Further, we read here that:

The [IIU] website also claimed that the IIU’s educational programmes were accredited and quality controlled by the impressive sounding QAC-UK Ltd - the Quality Assurance Commission, based in North London. 

Yes, I'm very much aware that anyone may set up an institution. The source above says of this one:

A further check at Companies House revealed that far from the being “independent” the QAC is in fact owned by [IIU] university boss Professor Dr Sandhu.

The question is not of whether it has been set up; it's of whether it should be taken seriously.

Thank you for comparing me with "God". (Most comparisons I see are less flattering.) But what do you mean by "[giving] you talk website"?

Do please sign your own contributions to talk pages. This is very easy: you simply press the tilde ("~") key four times in a row. (With a French keyboard for Windows, I believe that this is AltGr-é, although I'm not sure of this. Ah! Ici on lit  prenez l'habitude de signer votre message en cliquant sur le bouton )