Self-promotion, is it then?  There is no Jacobite activity after Henry, except in culture and the Whig-Tory conflicts actually on British soil.  Tell us which supposed heirs acknowledge such claims, or quarter their coats of arms with the UK.  Henry was the last to do so and as such, the Royal Website  recognizes the last legitimate heirs.  Let's get this clear: my (and other) opposition does not necessarily stem from anti-Stuart/pro-Hanover agendas.  I think it is debasing to present the legacy of the Stuarts as having been upheld by the House of Savoy and others.  Where was their royal visit to Scotland, as Georgie Porgie did?  Where was their interaction at all with any Jacobites in history, except fanboys like yourself who intrude in their lives and annoy them with these fallacious claims?  Sure, some of those dead people knew the Jacobites and helped them out.  Whether I like it or not, the Hanoverians rightfully succeeded to the House of Stuart.  None of these people YOU support as rightful heirs, have had anything to do with the UK whatsoever all this time and yet, YOU expect everybody to agree with unsourced claims.  Websites can be set up by teenagers.  You've obviously done extensive research into the lives of the actual Jacobites and that is what matters here, not theoretical succession.  Just think of Michael Abney-Hastings, 14th Earl of Loudoun.  Stop the nonsense.