"
I'm not sure from that comment how much you understand about research in this area.  There is for example a dispute about the validity of self-reported results in the general evidence base for CBT which has gained momentum in the last five years.  A lot of new work has been done since 2004 that would throw those claims into dispute.  At the moment you are giving prominence to a one country study in a controversial area that is itself 8 years old.  That is cherry picking as the table gives a false impression of CBT's position in the pantheon of methods.  I can understand an advocate pushing it, but we have to be balanced here.   TALK "