Resolution 1546 seems a curiously technical way of defining when the Iraqi military occupation ended.  Whenever a foreign power has significant numbers of armed forces in a country who operate essentially outside the governance of that country's government, the country is de facto "occupied".  I'm sure you'd accept that whether or not a country is truely occupied is often POV?
 But regardless, the terms "occupied territories" and "military occupation" also denote differences in scale.  Whole countries are usually subject to military occupation, while in general "occupied territories" refer to lands that arn't distinct or entire countries.  This might sound like POV but I think I can back this up if you give me a moment to research.