I do not have the book here with me at the moment.  Is it a Wikipedia requirement to not only provide a book but also page number and chapter number, etc?  That would put enough burden and responsibility on volunteer contributors to not be able to controbute in a practical way.  That would be the kind of detail you would expect from a well-paid staff such as the major commercial or academic encyclopaedias have (and even in their case, I don't think they provide page numbers or greater details, they just mention the source).  At any rate, this book is academic, authentic and well-respected.  Naturally, it is deeply hated by its opponents.   22:37, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)