:Okay, getting back to work here, as the article has degenerated even further. I mean "some argue" that UNRWA is bad, in the lede, cited to a reprint of a Washington Times op-ed? A minor correction to a report (okay, Israel shelled crowds of civilians just outside an UNRWA facility, rather than inside, so what?) becomes boosted into some kind of scandal, evidence of UNRWA's anti-Israel motives which make it untrustworthy, etc, etc. This is unacceptable.