If you noticed relevant sourced factual material that got deleted (no matter why or how), why didn't you just put it back? (I did so myself recently, when I noticed a deleted citation from Roger Beck about Commagene.) Actually though, the substantial changes since February consist of additions of sourced factual material e.g. from Vermaseren, from David Ulansey, from Statius, Plutarch and Porphyry.  Do you think these additions are a bad thing? If so, why?