Future Perfect at Sunrise, recall what the original name of wikihounding was, "wikistalking". Wikihounding is "following another user around". 
For a perfect example of wikihounding, look at Jack Merridew's previous arbcoms, in which the arbcom unanimously found that Jack  Merridew was wikihouding. Jack Merridew followed around Cool Cat from page to page, on several pages, over a period of months.
This case is completely different. I commented on two pages: in the Arbcom, and then I notice the ANI, which I have watchlisted and frequently comment on.  I have not followed Jack Merridew at all.
By your absurd standard, User:Daedalus969  and who created Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive582#Jack_Merridew.27s_disruptive_signature and anyone else who first commented in the Arbcom then commented in ANI, is a "wikihounder" You are setting a absurd precedence here: that an editor who comments in a arbcom, and then comments about the same editor on ANI, is wikihounding, and can be threatened by a admin with a block. 
Future Perfect at Sunrise, you have been here long enough to know that you should not try to second guess an editors motivations.  
Unfortunately this is not the first admin abuse and bad judgment I have seen, in this arbcom, an admin was calling my edits shit, and another admin has repeatedly defended personal attacks; in addition I helped desopy 3 admins.  
Your baseless personal attacks are offensive and your administrative abuse is troubling.