I was correcting factual inaccuracies. I more or less rewrote a propaganda piece single-handedly into an acceptable and neutral article. And I have now constructively pointed out massive problems (not just by the way) by an editor who caught my eye at "Did you Know" with the very poor "Nazi talking dog" story. You clearly were reached to a online pal (who I've discovered writing two error ridden and skewed articles in as many days)-and are now doing their bidding rather than focusing on improving some rather poor content. That is, you have actively harmed your websites mission with your actions. I was pretty sure this would be how it would go done, but fascinating nonetheless.