, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
, there are a number of key words or red flags on Wikipedia. They have a very strong effect in the community. Disruptive editing is one of them. If you want to abuse your position as a trusted editor here, you say the editor you have a difference of opinion with, is "disruptive" when he or she simply has a different opinion - as you so correctly mentioned. Confidently demonstrating with reliable sources that a statement is an encyclopedic statement appropriate to be on WP is not disruptive editing. However the term disruptive editing is one of a number of terms abused by abusive editors on WP. It is very disheartening when some "trusted" editor immediately use that term against you when you simply have a different opinion. They know the power of that word, that is why they use it. There are a number of these "power" words used in the WP community. Abusively using this tactic is a personal attack - in my opinion. The other editor involved here also stated my contributions in various articles is wasting Wikipedians´ time. He also considers the fact that I address you and other editors by name as something that can be used in a negative way against me.   11:07