I understand and sympathise with your complaint about the word 'vandal' but it is the word used at Wikipedia for destructive editing (not really an issue in most internet forums such as Yahoo! Groups) in the absence of a better idea. I myself would also cite 'troll' and 'sockpuppet' as words with an online currency but a degree of offensiveness which does not really conform to normal (non-Internet) standards of etiquette (I never use these terms). The relevance of Rupert Murdoch here is that he is the world's major newspaper magnate, an Australian and the owner of the type of tabloid newspaper complicit in the continual stigmatisation of schizophrenics by association in the public mind with the perpetration of violence - perhaps unfairly, as the section on 'violence' indicates, particularly in view of this group's poor access to legal representation globally. Your innocence in the matter seems at variance with the degree of professional qualification and participation evinced on your homepage. If you truly feel that using Wikipedia itself as a reference is 'inappropriate' are you thereby opposed to Wiki links, as consistency seems to demand? And could you or someone else please exemplify alternative content for this section 'written and referenced appropriately'?