, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 Note that valid questions I asked in regards to my citations were never answered by the contributor Mihaiam, who is the only person who has repeatedly removed my addition - and yet I am the one accused of having my version enforced - when it is Mihaiam repeatedly removing my contributions.  The first sentence regarding the Copenhagen Interpretation was present before I made redactions to the article - and has also been repeatedly removed by Mihaiam - therefore it is not even my additions Mihaiam is insisting upon, it is his own version.  This is not consensus, it is Mihaiam insisting he be the only contributor.

I find it interesting that this first original sentence was removed by Mihaiam (that was not even my inclusion) along with the additional clause I included with solid citations and references (including links to other Wikipedia Pages with almost exact quotes) regarding the Von Neumann Interpretation - as an adjunct to the Copenhagen Intepretation - both of which are well established in Quantum Physics and is very much related to Quantum Entanglement.  The two Interpretations included are the most prominent Interpretations of the Measurement problem at this time, therefore Mihaiam specious argument that it provides undue weight is also a straw man argument.

Consensus means I also have a right to provide my contributions.  Currently I am blocked out from editing.  So what is next.  How does one enter fair arbitration where someone looks at the references and citation I have made in good faith and an equitable decision is made - not just Mihaiam who has not answered my repeated requests asking why he thought my references were invalid - which is not a free discussion or an attempt at achieving consensus in good faith (and yet I am being blamed here.) Thank you.    18:31