Being a newbie, I don't know where this concern goes...Alexbrn, maybe you can post this in your query if that is where it goes? The issue: In a less disputed wiki article/section, the obvious solution to this quandry would be to present Daar and Dugan's viewpoints and then the rebuttal/response that was published...somehow acknowledging that both sources are credible for demonstrating the contrasting perspectives and both may be biased in their own way. Yet in the case of this wiki page, the whole category of publications written and published from Waldorf/Waldorf-related sources is being excised. So, what do you do? WP:SCHOLARSHIP suggested to me that you go with a third-party source but maybe something else is better? Thanks.