My objective is to improve the factual quality of the article.  However if no-one is prepared to remove statements in the article which have been established to be inaccurate (i.e. Alan's erroneous statements about the jurors William Waters and Randolph Holinshed re the Brincknell incident), then we're all just wasting our time in terms of improving the quality of the article.  I have a wealth of specialized knowledge derived from having transcribed and translated hundreds of original documents concerning Oxford's life (I'm not speaking of the authorship issue here; I'm speaking of Oxford's biography).  If people editing this article refuse to take advantage of that specialized knowledge, both by refusing to allow the citation of primary source documents which are readily available for anyone to check on my website, AND by refusing to cite my article in Brief Chronicles, then I guess that's Wikipedia's loss and a loss to all Wikipedia users who would like a reliable article on Oxford.  What else can I say?  Nina Green 205.250.205.73