I am not your friend, sorry. That said, I don't believe that I ever insinuated that YOUR edits were partisan. I noted that editing was going on which was partisan, and I believe that to be an accurate statement. In fact, a casual perusal of the edit history with regard to the "retired / was forced to retire" issue substantiates that. I have already stood behind my allegation above, and I continue to do so now. As far as evidence goes, I tender your complete lack of interest in any pages of any outgoing incumbents, all of which reflect the same status, beyond this one. Is this because you and West share a military background? Is it because both you and he are professed conservatives? I don't pretend to know, but as I stated, your interest in this page, and only this page, with regard to this concept is suggestive. I do not have a reactionary mentality. What I also do not have is a subservient mentality, which seems to be what is required here. In that regard, I am abandoning further interest in this article, not because I do not believe it to be in need of heightened accuracy, but because I believe that further discussion about it is pointless. In parting, I would suggest working on your people skills. This is not a dictatorship, and treating people who try to contribute with contempt and derision is not a productive strategy. Food for thought