One More Stab at Making the Article Neutral  
I have inserted a passage that is identical to a passage from the "homophobia" article. It merely replaces the word "homosexuality" with "transexuality/transexualism". There is absolutely no reason to keep this passage out - other then to provide the article with a liberally slanted viewpoint. It is more difficult to find a citation for opposition to use of the word "transphobia" than it is to find a citation for opposition to the use of the word "homophobia" simply because most people don't even know this word exists. Common sense, however, makes it clear that opposition does exist for the same reasons.
Depsite changes to the article, it still remains nothing but an unsourced opinionated opening section, which is then followed by a list of unfortunate incidents. That's not an ecncylopedia article. That's a political pamphlet. With this addition, I believe that we can at least make the article reasonably neutral in the same way that it seems to have made the "homophobia" article neutral. I'm glad that we got rid of that Lewis Ranja guy, but he did have a good point.