Question 

I hope you are not suggesting that - for the first time in my 7,200 content edits to wikipedia - I have somehow suddenly started adding inappropriate contentious content to wikipedia? As explained on WP:ANI, out of the blue and without consulting me, Hipocrite added the content I have been carefully preparing over 3 days. I added a small summary at the beginning, which was required. Actually, as others have suggested, various bits can be pruned and the inline citations tightened up. On the other hand what was there before was not a proper history section:  unlike mine it was not a summary of secondary sources.  I don't have any plans to edit anything other than the history section, which no other editor had thought of doing up until now. Without a history section there was absolutely no indication what debate had gone, why that was and amongst whom.