Wikipedia's Stephan Schulz
 Referring to here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raylopez99 
 Italic text and this quote here: "I'll warn or block any user I see who persists in such comments, although I have to say that I rarely have seen such incoherent aggression before." this shows me one of two things:  (1) you are prone to making aggrandizing statements like "although I have to say that I rarely have seen such incoherent aggression before", which begs the question about what was "incoherent" about my statement to this person, or, (2) you are very inexperienced about human interaction.  Either way, you're probably not the best person to be moderating Wikipedia.  I understand Wikipedia, being unpaid, is facing a crisis in finding competent administrators.  Shame, since the current administrators seem to be ruining it for everybody.  Worse, you have failed to read this section, that you cite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CIVIL#Assume_good_faith  Now ask yourselftelling an administrator like William, who has been voted out by the Wikipedia committee as an administrator (due to his censoring activities and apparent bias towards the Global Warming cause, as has been exposed in the online mainstream media) that he should not censor any of my comments about his censorship about a particular article on the Wiki page that he censoredis clearly "good faith".  In fact, it goes to the very issue of the article under consideration.  How is that not good faith?  You perhaps were offended by the rhetorical "twist the knife" remark I made, but that's small beer.  Nuff said.  I'm not going to make a mountain out of a molehill, but this is another example of why Wikipedia has gone downhill, and now is just a shadow of it's former self and potential.  Have a nice day.