Retrodumb claims this trial's "Encyclopedic value is negligible". There is an entire section in the shooting page just about the US legal concept of stand your ground, and even more detailed sections in the trial page. These are filled with links to other pages. What kind of idiot do you have to be to be able to blithely dismiss that sort of comprehensive content as being of "negligible" value to an encyclopedia? Does it not occur to dolts like him that giving people just that sort of background infromation is the primary purpose of an "encyclopedia". Does he even know what an encyclopedia is even for? What a moron.