Most of them get banned... Sorry but I'm very cynical, considering when looking at the editing history of Republican office holders in northern Illinois and seeing what was done and the lack of good faith in 80% of it.  In my humble opinion, the Peter Roskam is a badly flawed and bias work.  The bio lacks neutrality and is overloaded with inflammatory nonsense.  The petty, bold face strong arming is not very civil.  The "YOUR JOE H so YOUR BANNED" when strong,logical argument is presented, that is self evident by my overview look at the editing history of the Roskam bio. Bias and lack of the good faith and game playing, partisan nonsense is all that is happening now and all that wikipedia seems to be about now.  Its not about the truth or NPOV its now about game play.