(ec)Call me idealistic, but wouldn't most scientists and encyclopiedists believe that the archaeology is the same, regardless of what you call the place? Reliable sources may employ different names, but do the high quality (archaelogical) sources say they're "focusing on different elements" because its "Israeli" or "Palestinian" Archaeology? (nah) From a wikipedia standpoint, wouldn't it make more sense to have a main article elucidate the best scientific knowledge of the area? (yah) Then, you all could put (POV)  interpretations, motivations, politics, etc into distinct Palestinian or Israeli sections or articles. Ciao,  | Talk