If I may answer for Nancy (she should feel free to correct me), such a summary will be accused of being apologetic.  I saw it at earlier FACs where a significant number of editors thought there was not enough coverage of this issue.  "This is a big deal! There is not enough coverage. Censorship!"  (One may note such sentiments are not wholly absent from this talk page either.) I read it as recentism as well as the whipping-boy status the Church has in certain circles of western media.  I sympathize with Nancy and others that such a concise formulation would be a target at FA and an obstacle to achieving FA status. However, I would rather help produce a serious and reputable reference work than enable systematic bias of that type.   (Yak!)