"

 Greek love 

I'm looking for a way to extricate myself honorably from this mess. I'm leaving a note here because you closed this AfD, where I made a commitment to do as you instructed in the closing statement. There are two editors who have long sought to delete or eviscerate the article, one of whom has used a series of user names (unacknowledged on his current user page but available , so at first glance it may appear on the talk page there are more than two editors in the 'suppress' camp). I complain here about their coordination. Other editors, including  and I simply can't do it any longer. I haven't changed my position on the validity of the article, but I've been accused (on various talk pages, and never the appropriate notice boards) of edit warring, ownership, disruption, and even pedophilia by implication, all for trying to carry out what the community decided. I'm done. I need to limit my time on Wikipedia at present, and wish for that time to be spent pleasantly and productively. When I've made a commitment, though, it grieves me not to keep it. I'm not asking you to do anything: I'm just explaining why I can't keep my word as given at the AfD.   

Wow, that is a mess.Certainly no hard feelings  on my end, it is clear you endeavored in good faith to improve the article. I have found that knowing when to walk away is an essential skill, not only here but in the real world. Sometimes your presence, despite your best intentions, is harmful rather than helpful, and sometimes a dispute just isn't worth it anymore. Best of luck in your future endeavors here.   

 Mailchimp 

I'm not that bothered but I think that the Mailchimp speedy deletion was a mistake.  It did cite that it was one of the more important email marketing programs so it was stating the importance - something that was supposed to be the original problem.

  

The criteria specifies a credible'' claim of significance. Wordpress pages are not reliable sources. However, I would certainly not object to it being restored as a redirect, as it was for several momnths before today.   
Talkback

 (talk) 

Just a hunch?

Call it my intuition but I'm guessing that his username is a direct challenge to patrolling admin that you guys won't block him based on the username itself, but his contribution speaks volume of his nonsense louder (my other hunch being he's a returning editor!) than his username does. Just my 2 cents. Cheers~!  ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to be a returning editor, the username is not a blatant violation of the policy.  If you have any evidence of socking file at WP:SPI.   

 Recreation of article Shay Carl 

I would like to request that the article Shay Carl be recreated, see the deleted Talk:Shay Carl for my reasons (note, Talk:Shay Carl was delete because of A1, not notibility).    
Well, there was