Seizures under the 'Trading with the Enemy' Act, 1942
Article phrasing seems contradictory.  First it says the companies were seized, then it says there is no evidence that they were seized.  Which is it?   02:27 28 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Of course the companies were siezed.  It is common knowledge and it is well documented.  I'm going to revert that disclaimer.  16:45, Aug 28, 2003 (UTC)
 Now, there's no context at all to the seizures.  I don't think you have improved the article with your last edit.  Prescott Bush was not a Nazi collaborator, sympathizer, or anything of the sort, but it sure seems that way now.  I merely wanted the phrasing to be cleaned up by someone more familiar with this — it's not really common knowledge.   04:33, Aug 29, 2003 (UTC)
The seizures under the Trading with the Enemy Act are matters of public record. I've added some innocuous biographical material. I've removed "overseeing" Nazi slave camps: let's not get carried away here. But "patriarch of the Bush family' seems a little fatuous for the man who was the son of a rich steel manufacturer who married a rich wife... User:Wetman