(edit conflict with below) I see not. Don't do it, LG, it can get you blocked, or at least cause significant disruption. Scuro can be handled; and, in fact, he is useful to the project as long as he is restrained by other editors. Unrestrained, yes, he has done damage in the past, which may be taking time to undo. But take it one step at a time: develop and demonstrate good dispute resolution skills, which means always seeking to extend consensus, while at the same time being firm, within behavioral guidelines, against damage. It's impossible to do this alone, but two or three editors who are in POV agreement should be very careful about imposing this agreement on the article, disregarding even a single editor with a different POV. These are general considerations, and I have explicitly not considered any pending disputes over article text. There is discussion of this on my Talk page, started by Doc James.