I have read the guideline, please don't insult my intelligence. I don't know how it can be dumbed down any more to your reading level. I am an MD and FRCPC and I have an obligation to report the use of propaganda by industries that promote unhealthy products. The information I inserted was in two parts. The first part demonstrates why it is clear that both the tobacco industry (previously) and tanning industry promote harmful products and the similarities in their use of marketing and propaganda. The next part clearly outlines "how propaganda was used by the tanning industry".  EXACTLY AS YOU SUGGESTED I MUST DO. UV Radiation is listed as a class I carcinogen by the World Health Organization, so when the indoor tanning industry reports a one-sided argument, and neglects to mention that their product causes cancer, this is propaganda (in keeping with the definition at the top of the article, which I presume you actually read?). When they propose that provincial governments are working with Neutrogena to sell sunscreen to make the public doubt the health care system and their messages regarding the real harms of UV radiation, then this is propaganda. 

So I ask you again, binksternet, DID YOU EVEN READ THE EDITS BEFORE CRYING COATRACK? I am getting frustrated by your complete and utter bias.  You are the one who should really read the COATRACK guidelines before retorting.

And to the editor who suggested I have an axe to grind, what a stupid and useless comment. Do the writers of this article have an axe to grind against Nazism? I hope so, I am Jewish and believe the Nazis demonstrated the most obvious and systematic use of propaganda with horrendous consequences. Having a purpose behind the writings on wikipedia is legitimate, as long as your contributions include factual statements and are unbiased. I am unbiased in my writings, as they are based on fact and supported by the medical community. If you can prove otherwise, DO SO. OTHERWISE, PUT THE CONTENT BACK ON NOW. Or tell me how to report you and take this to someone over your head. You are way out of line and this is your last chance. You are compromising the integrity of wikipedia by quelling information that should be available to its readers.