again its you and  wiki rukes that don't get the message. bad behaviour is in not allowed. its inexcusable and leads to being told off; personal criticism is the correct way to treat  some one behaving badly; and wiki rules should not be protecting the guilty. Personal criticism is what is required. if you act arrogantly or like a lazy dictator then you deserved to be called  on it and told in no  uncertain terms. your response of the 23 april was pathetic. "i know nothing of tennis expert's behaviour" is totally neglience on your part. you should be very well aware of  the history of the feud between tennis expert and myself on rod laver. you have been aware of it since late feb 2008  . you should have invsetigated rod laver there and then; you were told where the dispute was. there's no excuses for not reading all the evidence ; it exists and is easily accessible. that's jour job if you  agree to be somesort of judge. As to me using blue flahes you can't be serious.  i know nothing of wiki fancy stuff; all i do is write sentances; nothing else; i use my keyboard like a typewriter. i might further add that the wiki complaints procedure is unintelligble and like all of wiki a labyrinth with countless dead ends.
  your response to be correctly crticised was to act like a vindictative policeman. punish the man who has justifiably criticism him. that's what you did and that 's bad behaviour.. and you  and wiki rules should take your punishment in being roundly criticised. wiki rules are rubbish and have no place in public forums. I was not given a vote on wiki rules and i'm under no obligation to follow them. bad actions should lead to condenmation in  words  and if wiki is blocking it then wiki deserves to be flushed down the toilet

jeffreyneave 1 may 2008