Note to all editors:

Like others, I see a number of problems in this article, which seem to be largely the work of one individual.  I notice, too, that about 90% of this Talk page is taken up discussing or arguing with this same person.  I find the following things to be problematic:

(1)  Making up new meanings for Norse Words that contradict their actual meanings in all academically respected Old Norse dictionaries;
(2)  Altering dates of cited references, making them appear to be outdated, when in fact they are the preeminent academic reference works used by Old Norse scholars;
(3)  Citing instead reference works that really are out of date, even as noted in Wikipedia (Pokorny);
(4)  Linking to other internal or external articles that either do not support a statement or to articles that contradict it;
(5)  Editing that shows a complete lack of knowledge of Old Norse;
(6)  Editing that shows fundamental misunderstanding of linguistics;
(7)  A persistent pattern of wholesale reverting other's edits;
(8)  An admission of wholesale revert of the main article, or "blatant vandalism."