The wording you are trying to force into the article is simply ridiculous.  I assumed it was some sort of joke on your part at first, but it really seems you're serious.  And it seems that editors like you who don't understand basic policy are no longer uncommon here - I see that someone reverted that edit that you point out, to restore a copyright violation into the article.  I don't really know what to say to you other than that "described by X as being best known for being Y" instead of "Y" is an obviously ridiculous way to introduce the subject of an article.  Is it that you can't understand that, or that you won't? 190.46.98.195