:::The following is an opinion:

"Pointing out to you that these images are not usable under current policies is in no way at all close to anything you could win a libel suit on[.]"

Interestingly, the original Jim Apple wording was nowhere near as benign as your fantasy retort infers: Screenshots can be fairly used when talking about the software or the website, but not when stealing images from the website in question. (Jim Apple )

As you can see, DreamGuy, the notion that I am a thief is not implicit in Jim's statement.  It is cold, open, hostile and obvious.

Am I to fear "Wikipedia" as an entity because it has a policy banning users who "threaten to sue people"?  A rule that no doubt emerged to conceal and protect known criminals on board here.  As you may glean from my original text, nary a threat was made.  

Threat is a noun, and defined as:

1. An expression of an intention to inflict pain, 
   injury, evil, or punishment.
2. An indication of impending danger or harm.
3. One that is regarded as a possible danger; a menace.

American Heritage Dictionary, 4th Edition 2000

As is rabidly apparent, none of these definitions apply in even the remotest of extrapolations.
My statements were and remain pure and simple defense against very blatant slander.
(How can the prospect of fair judicial process be regarded as an intent to harm, endanger, 
punish or inflict pain?)  Twist the context to suit whatever dreamworld you inhabit, D.G.,
your opinion cannot alter brutal reality.

The issue at hand:

I have labored rather significantly to improve Tutankhamun, moreso than most.  Wikipedia is in absolutely, ABSOLUTELY no danger IN EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE by utilizing the images I have uploaded, and the truly sickening part is that both of you  Jim, Dream  BOTH OF YOU know it.  There is absolutely zero "wrong" or "incorrect" with the method I have implemented to furnish supplemental illustrations.  You both are completely cognizant of that as well, yet choose to play schoolyard bullies and kick the bricks in on my castle.  It is childish and shameful and the perfect exemplar of everything that is wrong with Wikipedia.  Wiki needs people, not kings.  You're only about seven hundred years too late. ( )