Alright, Ched; I can see you are a reasonable person, and I appreciate you taking the time to reply.  I admit that I have taken this too far.  Some of it is an attempt to flush people out and try to understand what is happening.  I have made dozens of edits to to wikipedia over the years (usually not logged in) and I do try to improve it.  It's a great resource; we all know that.  I've had a very small percentage of my edits reverted over the years and it never bothered me.  To give a little history: I read the article and towards the bottom it mentions (2 sources, btw) how 2 Indians were shot, killed, and eaten.  I thought to myself, "wow, that's pretty surprising; I had always heard that no one was murdered and they just ate people who had died naturally.  I should probably try to emphasize this so other people see it too without having to read down 30 paragraphs."  It seems to me that there is quite a difference between eating someone who's already dead, and killing someone to eat them.  Call me crazy.  Anyway, first I added a subheading and also put a mention in the opening paragraph.  I acknowledge that adding it to the opening paragraph was probably overkill, but doesn't this incident at least deserve its own sub-heading?  I challenge you to find the mention of the killings in the current article.  It is very difficult to find without reading the entire article.  And how many times in modern history have people in the USA been killed so they could be eaten?  I suggest to you that this is a noteworthy and highly unusual event.  Anyway, I will stop now.  Thanks again.