"
Hipocrite, I doubt that one isolated incident is evidence of a long history of a pattern of incivility.  If there are other examples in recent history, I'd be happy to evaluate them.  But no, it doesn't mean that if Pedro slips up 9 months from now, he's going to be insta-blocked for all eternity.  And, as for being on the recall list: Pedro asked me a long time ago if I'd have any objections to being on the list, and I said no.  That's about it.  As far as I am aware, being on the list means that I have the option of petitioning Pedro to relinquish his admin privileges, nothing more.  It doesn't mean I'm obligated to stalk all of his edits and make sure he's behaving.  At this point, I haven't seen any evidence that would convince me that he is no longer fit to be an admin.  Were the comments uncivil?  Of course they were.  Do they deserve a desysop or a block?  In my opinion, unless there is clear evidence that this was more than just an isolated incident of a personal attack, then no.  Everyone screws up from time to time.  We don't desysop/block people because they had a bad day, unless it can be shown that they've been having a bunch of bad days recently, and that it is disrupting people's ability to contribute to the encyclopedia.  Frankly (and I know you will probably all see this as the cabal protecting itself), I see this as a witch hunt against an admin that you don't particularly get along with.  If you have a real issue with Pedro and you have real evidence that this is a long-term problem, then please present evidence in the form of diffs and I will gladly evaluate it.  But, I'm not going to waste my time searching for it myself, because my hunch is that this is not going anywhere.  | spout _ "