I have the right to edit this article.  I am requesting that you justify, with reliable sources every "fact" you give.  Since you put these "facts" on the page, you have the burden of showing them to be facts.  (Good luck!!)  Also, you are not supposed to be doing an original work, and should be able to cite your sources for all information.  None of the "facts" I tagged appear on the ACT website, so that claim does not wash.  (One fact does appear there, but I didn't tag that.)  Removal of my tags without providing a citation would be an act of vandalism, IMHO. Also, accusing me of vandalism on this article is, well, itself vandalism  see above comments by an administrator.