Lets see one of those reverts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11%2C_2001_attacks&diff;=154892636&oldid;=154892196

Well that looks to me like I'm being silenced right there. Look how it says I'm trolling.
TAB
 Amen, amen, amen. Note that I've been discussing these same points on here, and like you I have rarely (if ever) edited this article. All your points here are dead-on.  
- TABTAB 
- TAB
THE ARTICLE DOES NOT SUGGEST THERE IS ANY DOUBT OVER THE TRUTH OF THE OFFICIAL STORY. The truth has been amputated out of it.
TAB
One shall not post referrences that slander religions even if it's written by the pope himself. The word ISLAMIC does not cover the load, it is as unspecific as the word NEGRO. Reference to mainstream acusations of NEGRO extreamistic behaviour are one hundred percent bullshit.
TAB
This is just immoral behaviour. One will have to show credible prove there are actual suicide attackers. One can not enforce imaginary truths upon others. We need THE FACTS.
TAB
You boil it all down to one line here, my compliments:
TAB
The ideal here is to have both viewpoints existing side-by-side on the same article
TAB
We can't have either one of the storys as the main version and insult everyone as conspircacy hoaxters who disagrees with it? Specially if the group who actually looked is acused by those who ignored the evidence.
TAB
You may desperatly want to believe Osamu made the US military stand down. Melting steel? Pre-collapse explosions? Termite reactions? Your imaginary Muslims must have super powers?
TAB
I think before accusing one single Muslim you shall address all of those topics and make it evident that Osama and the 40 box-cutter ninjas preformed this attack.
TAB
The FBI says: "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
TAB 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden#_note-56
TAB
No official connection. Comprendo? Now that just makes it a wiki-page full of lies or doesn't it?
TAB
The lies are not open for discussion.
TAB
This truth needs to be reflected by the article. I find it rather hard to believe those in denial are trying to make wikipedia lie for them. I'm only asking for the main concerns to be addressed in the article. The main questions people are walking around with.
TAB
The article should also make it clear that there is no official connection between 911 and the Iraq "war". In contrast with the 911 war recruitment infomercials.
TAB
The article should mention the number of times we have seen the towers collapsed on TV. Apparently we had to see it happened hundreds of times in contrast with a ridiculous official story and a total lack of investigation.
TAB
( )