“OS, you're welcome to edit here if you make constructive edits to articles within our policies,”

Come down please from your high horse Ms. SlimVirgin and answer my charge against you. If you liked AE so much that you were nominating him for administrator why you imposed yourself as the mediator? Why you were so unfair to me from the start and broke ALL the rules of Wikipedia. Now you accuse me of the same. I repeatedly asked you to be specific. You failed because you can’t. But I can. I can show you broke the rules of Wikipedia on many instances. Instead of lecturing me, you must apologize for being biased. 

“sweeping generalizations about certain religions?” So you don’t like any criticism about your religion do you? What part of my criticism of Islam was sweeping generalization? I have been very specific so far and tried to provide opposing views to Islam. You simply do not have the tolerance for that. That is why you decry my contributions and call them “sweeping generalization” or try to dismiss them as  Islamophobia. Are views contrary to Christianity Chistianophobia? Do we have anyone crying Judaismphobia, Hinduphobia or Buddhistphobia? Why only Muslims make that claim? It is to silence any voice of opposition. You did that here and you even sided each time with my opponent to ban my views. This is unethical. Is that an insult? Am I allowed to say you acted unethically? Or would I be banned again? If this is not despotism what it is? Of course you can’t jail or kill me. But you do what you can. You censor me, violate my rights and ban me. 

Go ahead. Block me. That is all you can do. You are unable to respond to any of my accusations against you. So using force is all you can do.  09:02 27 Oct. 2005