To be fair, ip 184 has stated at least twice that "he does not care about promoting his books".  the content ip 184 deleted was infact a violation of WP:rs which he did state on at least one of the deletions. ip 184 has posted at least 60 references that do fall within wp:rs guidelines.  Ip 184 has also stated that they only wish to be acknowledge for "the ground breaking" information, which may be true. I hope i'm not being forward and forgiving me for assuming this ip 184 if it is not true, but I think ip 184 wishes to be acknowledged for rediscovering information.  Perhaps ip 184 should state things in 3rd person via wp:rs.  The guidelines state "that work may be added as long as it directly contributes to the article, in which case, imho, it does.  I think if ip 184 would read and follow the guidelines, they might be far more welcomed within this community.  To be more fair, a request is not a demand and therefore not a violation of policy.  The only legitimate issue here is that 184 does not sign their post.  Don't really think thats ban worthy, but I think they know why they are banned.99.25.73.37