OK  
Regarding your recent message about "Naked", my edit is based on the character's arguable status as an anti-hero. It becomes apparent to me that Leigh's intention was to portray someone who, while probably hailing from a higher academic milieu or background (whether conventional or self-taught) uses his eloquence and education in an deliberately overbearing manner. You cannot deny the fact that the film clearly passes judgment on the character on this and other levels. I just wanted to summarize this in a few words. 
  

Most of the already-existing text (e.g. terms such as "reckless" or "egotistical") would also qualify as non-neutral if subjected to a thorough scrutiny.   

Thanks for the reply. I'd suggest finding references for any further changes you wish to make to the article. I also suggest raising any questions in article talk regrading other changes you propose.   
I'm not going to enter a futile edit war just for the heck of it, especially now that your attention seems to be fixed on my particular edit for this particular article, but I cannot leave this unanswered. There are no references for most of what is already written about this film in the wiki page. I'll say again: if we were to subject this to the same level of scrutiny all along, the summary for the film would be "A human male flees Manchester for London and has conversations, and some intercourse, with a few characters, gets beaten and leaves".

Have it your way, I have other things to pay attention to. And please keep these interchanges in your own talk page.