I did not file any retaliatory complaints, that is a blatant lie, he filed one after I simply left him a warning on his user talk page. They both certainly are in violation of the tree revert rule, they were section blanking previously added content which I had nothing to do with, the entire section about September 11th is gone now, I never even added that, all I did in the process was add citations. I also did not file any reports as retaliation, as I said I intended to file my incident report before I knew they would go and file them as well, you can infere this by the report Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lone_Gunmen I only asked for administrative oversight to editing. It appears that none of you know the three revert rule, wherein I added disputed content which was never even properly discussed or voted upon by other editors, simply reverted 3 times by the other editors. 72.72.240.141