Meowy's block is yet again an example of how every given rule can be transgressed and users have impunity by dishonestly reporting others when they gang up and edit war against that other user. Sandstein, will you be answering to Marshal? Or perhaps you can answer this. Thise are the number of times which Elsanaturk has reverted Meowy in that article. , , . Then two reverts by Brandmeister. , . Per wikipedia rules one can not just remove a tag (and this happened several times) without proper explanation. In articles talkpage there were 8 comments, 5 of them by Meowy (current blocked user) and none by both users who have ganged up to revert him. Meowy has justified the inclusion of the tag both in the talkpage and edit summaries. Just like the user above me, it fails to surprise me how you as an admin are able to ignore it on an account of a technicality. Frivolous, indeed.