Mondegreen 

Let me refresh your memory, because I clearly see that regulations have somewhat obscured it. Quoting WP:Revert: "if you feel the edit is unsatisfactory, then try to improve it, if possible - reword rather than revert." I have not yet seen a single example of a "chaste" veteran Wikipedia editor who actually made the effort to find references for unsourced claims (although I strongly feel that in this case it was fitting the description of the main article subject, so why source the obvious?) rather than ruthlessly reverting, thus making other editors "run errands." Isn't that what Wikipedia should be about – mutual help by equally respected members of the community, regardless of the time they've been here? What I see instead is something like "I'm just enforcing a policy by assigning a parking ticket. I know I might be wrong, but if you want to avoid paying the fine, better start running around... schnell! Hell, I'm not doing it for you, I got more heads to chop!"