The article was added by Potters House for deletion purely out of personal spite because I had contributed to it in the past. In other words, just nuisance activity. I consider that a relevant background fact worth sharing, together with the pasted evidence of his past behavior to back it up. You consider it merely 'personal attack'. That's where we diverge, and, to confine my comments to purely content: your pathetic mealy mouthed little edit isn't worthy of my piss, let alone my time.