This article is now considerably less lame than a month ago. However, the problem I still have with it is that the way the various POVs are presented implies that the fate of the peace process depends on the goodwill of the Palestinians, which appears uncertain, and hence Israel is the victim of their apparent duplicity. Let's be real: Israel is the occupying force here and has far, far greater military might (not to speak of economic power). The Palestinians are virtually mendicants. Hence it is ludicrous to quote Faisal Husseini calling for "the liberation of all Palestine from the river to the sea" without placing it within the governing geopolitical reality: Israel is armed to the teeth, backed by the even more powerful USA, and has between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. 

Your anti-Israel political rant is of no help here. If you can't be productive, then why are you here? Please do not start a fight. 

I would like to see the material in this article merged back into the parent article under the section "The Peace Process". If that section becomes too long, it then can be spun out in a separate article, such as The Israeli-Palestine Peace Process. The information serves little purpose in its current isolation.

 21:33, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

By an amazing co-incidence, the material about Faisal in this article contains an identical selection of quotes as . Choice of this many quotes from a single interview involves a creative act and is therefore copyrightable. Material removed as a possible copyright infringement.  22:58, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Absolutely false. This article contains nowhere near enough material to count as a copyright violation. This issue has been discussed before. Our limited quoting is well within US Copyright fair use allowances. In fact, for non-profit works, we have considerable more leeway than for-profit works. Again, you are censoring quotes for political purposes. As discussed above, your censorship is not acceptable.  14:38, Jan 11, 2004 (UTC)

 Selection of quotes is copyrightable. The GFDL means that content has to be free for all our sub-licensees, not just us. However, we can simply link to that article, which is what I've done.  15:00, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)