Quite a few of my edit were prior to Lancaster becoming involved in editing the page. Also the first block of my edits were when I was tasked with merging it with Actus et potentia. But it's Lancaster's rapid and escalating talk page demands that are much more of an issue than rapid edits to the article... I've had to spend an enormous amount of time responding to that talk page and to Talk:Energeia (one of the articles to be merged). Would it make any difference if I could prove he's made false and misleading statements in his "charges"?
But if that's not the sort of thing you usually look into, I don't want to impose.  Should I open a WP:AN3 like he did? I've collected this list from Aug 20 where Lancaster has reversed actions of mine, in whole or in part. (That's not all, and that's just the 20th).

Lancaster's deletion of most of what I've worked on in the article
18:46, 20 August 2010
My changes to the definitions in the lead from 0143, 20 August 2010:
18:35, 20 August 2010
My addition of modal logic to the lead from 0230, 20 August 2010:
18:35, 20 August 2010
My changes to §Actuality from 0110, 20 August 2010:
08:21, 20 August 2010
My addition of an OR tag from 0058, 20 August 2010
18:42, 20 August 2010

Please let me know if more instances or additional information on each would be helpful. Or anything that would help shed some light. Thank you.—