Hello, I'm EmmOmg, I noticed that you recently removed some content describing it as random and adding little substance but not disputing accuracy. I disagree as the the part in question speaks directly to the bio where Sunny Hostin is described as “... a former Assistant US Attorney, as well as a legal expert and TV personality, who is often called upon for her analysis on various provocative issues and high-profile criminal cases in the news.” The information speaks to her abilities, case knowledge, quality of opinion and ethical standards displayed during and after a nationally streamed debate on a preeminent legal question. Thus the information is directly on point (not random) as regards legal analysis and adds considerably to readers' understanding of legal bias and ethical standards.   Given there is no dispute of the accuracy of the information, the insert should stand.