Problems I am having with Sante Kimes article and changes 

I am wanting to document issues I am having with edits on Sante Kimes article.
All content herein refer to said article.

Moments ago I edited the "lead" content for the article.
My reason for doing this is because the "lead" was repetitious. As I wrote in the editing note, which state: "Repetitious lead -Lead info is covered in the article in same order. Previous lead was not "whitewashed" - Kimes is best known for 2 murders and the locations - This correction is neutral and factual"

I believe the change I made was of a neutral point of view and was supported by referenced links within said article.

The change I made had previously been posted by an administrator that I am apparently having trouble with.
I had hoped to work with the administrator in a constructive effort to improve the said article. However, it appears that said administrator is making changes to said article out of spite or personal feelings against me or the article's subject.
I had mentioned to the administrator in said article's discussion page that is they had a problem with the articles subject, then maybe another administrator could assist me in creating a neutral point of view for the article.

On the said article's discussion page, there have been several biased statements by said administrator about the article's subject. And, I feel, about me simply because I would like the said article to be 'balanced' and neutral.

I am wanting to document any issue here as so that if there is a problem later, it has been documented on my talk page.
NOTE: I am not naming the administrator as a favor even though I doubt the attempted favor will be appreciated.
Furthermore, if there is a problem later, I do have it.
I'm sure the said administrator will read this and take offense, however, this is being done to protect myself in any potential future problem.