Personal attack??!! 

I didn't attack you. I just corrected one small edit you had made. It isn't accurate to write "GNR (Portuguese police)" because GNR, a National Guard or gendarmerie (a military body charged with police duties among civilian populations), is usually known as the Guard (Guarda) and the designation "police" is almost always used for the PSP - Polícia de Segurança Pública. Finally, the PJ - Polícia Judiciária is known as the Judiciária. I didn't know we can't use the "undo" button - if that was what you tried to say to me. Cheers.  

Sorry I am a bit stressed, I do know gendarmerie is a french word but your new edit was cool. Perhaps I am getting stressed cos I dont like the Portuguese police and judiciary and feel desperately sorry for the McCaan's (my own dislike is personal and as far as that isnt acceptable here at least I am admitting my prejudice), I see you are Portuguese or at least a native speaker,  

edit warring

And stop accusing editors in good standing of "trolling".  Take a break, SqueakBox.  You're too experienced and too good an editor to behave like this.   

Removing a POV tag is trolling, adding it isnt, simple as that. And templating the regualrsd is not acceptabl;e, donmt do it again,   
Dude, your spelling is atrocious, your attitude bizarre, and your behavior intolerable.  Seriously - I know you're better than this as I've seen you around quite a bit.  You're obviously not yourself tonight.  TAKE A BREAK.   
And this dispute has now been (erroneously, IMHO) posted on ANI. (   

Spelling. That's so 20th Century, its called typos and it has nothing to do with spelling. All I want is for the NPOV tag to stay, its a reasonable request and its not asking too much as the article is POV. Best wishes. Cheers for the heads up re AN/I,  
Bah.  Spelling is important when the medium being used is written. )
I don't understand why you are insisting on having a separate NPOV template instead of allowing the issue to be noted in the "Multiple issues" template that is already in the article.  Can you please explain?   

Oh I dont doubt the importance of spelling, its typing I find difficult. This article is so POV, I do intend to seek out some other refs but NPOV demands both sides are prevsented and as I made clear on the talk that isnt happening in this article. That some rascist editors are targetting it (eg the banned fourdee) is ample evidence of that. I am baffled as to why anyone would remove the NPOV tag, I never do that before resolving the issue,  
Please answer the question: Why do you insist on a separate NPOV template when the other one communicates the exact same idea but with less clutter?   

I removed the blue tag. I want the orange tag there and I have fully explained my reasons. The article presents one side of an argument and not the other. I dont understand what the controversy is as I removed the unnotable blue tag,  
No, I'm afraid that you haven't answered the question.  I don't see a need to for multiple templates when one easily suffices.   
Nor do I. That is why I have removed the blue tag. An orange NPOV tag was created for a reason and it should stay as an orange tag. What is the problem? Anyway I see others are now edit  warring, i wont touch the article till teoimorrow but gibvenm editors like fourdee have edited the article its POV status is inevitable,