Another amazing and neutral wikipedia article *cough* *cough*...(yes it is an irony) ==

Another Zodiac article full of Npov issues and even misinterprations of the sources.Why...? 
Well because some people add to much negative traits or some others add way to much positive traits. There are even people that when they give a source they totally misinterpretate that source for their own personal agenta (i do not believe in coincidences in this site) 

Taurus is not a perfect zodiac. IT HAS GOOD BUT ALSO BAD QUALITIES just like every zodiac.
Some people must get that into their arrogant heads and stay neutral when they contribute or some reports to the Administrator will start happening around here for Non-neutral point of view activity. I am not a professional astrologer but i have enough astrological knowledge and i understand when someone is being neutral and contributes 100% exactly from what a source says...and who is not doing that. 
 
As the current situation goes in here i advice people not to trust reading the astrological signs from wikipedia.  

==