Did you READ the source?  It is dated 2011.  Your work is sloppy, slipshod.  If you don't read the link, how can you comment on it?  How can you render judgement as to its credibility?  It is far easier to click a button than to be a real copy-editor.

Further, I am going to go through this article and remove all text that isn't verified here, which will probably be more than half of the article.  Instead of specifically targeting one person, perhaps you could make an actual contribution to this article as a whole.  You seem more concerned with exercising internet editor power than contributing to knowledge and readership.