Then my response to you is the same as it was to  BLP, by definition, only applies to "living people." Kyle has been dead for two years. So just like I told him, BLP does not apply. Also the sources I used, all met WP:RS and were both relevant and notable. They also took up a very small part of the total article, so the fact that you believe they were "weighted heavily negative" (whatever that means) would be irrelevant, even if it were true. In fact, the Salon article quoted directly from Kyle's own book. So if there is any concern over "negativity", then attribute it to the author of the book - the subject himself. But, in an article that is rapidly taking on the form of a "testimonial" or some kind of "tribute page", those inclusions met WP:BALANCE. But more importantly, the fact that you would, not only defend Mongo's edits, but ignore his behavior - after you ignored the links I provided you - is surprising and disappointing. It suggests that you're not as fair-minded - or impartial - as you led me to believe. 2602:306:BD61:E0F0:DC43:6AD0:8320:410A