I personally have noticed something at wikipedia and in the discussion, which I would rather call "british historical revisionism". I'm sorry, but many Britons try to spin and squeeze facts and truthes. Additionally, they base their argumentation on statements like "everyone knows German sources aren't reliable" etc. and just quote British sources in contrast. British sources have been proven to be wrong and propagandistic before, too - but somehow this doesn't matter to those "unbiased" historians. Thus things like bombing German civilians, which was also described as crime by the British prime minister of that time and which can be called genocide if you refer to what "Bomber Harris" said, is being justified like "it is okay to kill civilians with bombs, but it is a war crime if you do so with a gun" by recent British revisionists historians. The job of many British historians seems to be to "improve" Britain's image by any mean.