Proposed new section.
I am now saving this to a text file since loremaster chooses to destroy information. Tyrannical anti-knowledge editor if I have ever seen one.
I'll quote what I put on my talk page that he REFUSES to read, disgusting;

Counter-Arguments to Criticism

It is important to note, most of these arguments employ one or more logical fallacies. They are often made implying certain claims such as some mystical and unchanging human nature. Other times they are so conservative that they threaten denying what is already possible today, such as organ replacement and robots performing many tasks in an adaptive manner. Some of these arguments use appeals to emotion, not limited to the claim that since there is an inequality between the rich and poor that we should slow down progress. Appeals to emotion such as this deny the fact that transhumanism will alleviate such problems instead of exacerbating them such as making the acquisition of food and knowledge more accessible. Technology improves everyone's life.