RF, Starlight problem 

Dear Slim

I request that you mediate in an issue, Starlight problem where an editor keeps reverting despite violating the rules against providing sources.  

Two main things:

The section Distant Starlight Problem#First attempts to address the problem has no sources.  Those who insist on this section have been repeatedly asked to state which early creationists proposed such a thing, and when.  For example, the statement "In the early part of the twentieth century most Young Earthers would assert that the stars were not in fact as far away as science suggests" lacks any reference to a creationist from 1900-1950.

A section Tu quoque is repeatedly deleted although it was sourced to a creationist who made this argument in one of their publications.  The question is not whether it is a good or bad argument; rather, in a page of a problem for creationists, it is proper to state creationist responses that can be sourced.