Also what you claim as FACTS are not FACTS, do you even read the stuff you post?

This is a subject that is still controversial, both as to the area of origin and the routes
between that area and the Philippines. There are two opposing hypotheses on both
subjects. Both hypotheses are agreed that the differing major languages and the many
different dialects spoken in the Philippines at the time of Portuguese and Spanish entry to
the Philippines in the early 15th century were all of the Austronesian Super Family. That
is where the agreement ends.
In the Philippines, the two best known hypotheses are those of Peter Bellwood and
mine (Solheim). While my hypothesis—which will be the main subject of this
presentation—started developing over 40 years ago, Bellwood’s is more recently
developed and has had much greater acceptance outside of the Philippines. Simply put,
he believes that ProtoAustronesian
originated in eastern South China opposite Taiwan
and was brought from there to Taiwan by maritime Chinese bringing with them rice
agriculture; this around 7000 years ago.

Your claims on facts are based on what? Obviously everything you state and post are just your opinions. You can't even show a source on how Filipinos having Malay background is false, you just simply state what you "know".