259694712&oldid;=259689030]. And what I added doesn't fit a "symbolism" section. Above, I was complaining about removal of mostly symbolic parts; well, actually, what I missed was first the mention of those fact, and only afterwards possible interpretations. Looking at the guideline and its provided example, I do think that the significance of the facts should be described in-between the plot. I'm not sure if that's what the manual of style actually says.   
You at the very least need to cite the "possible reference" part. gial 
 For instance, I do not appreciate most of the edits of this combined diff, from the same author of the one I discuss above: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garden_State_(film)&diff;=