I don't think I was agreeing with you. There is consensus that an administrative action should not be reverted unless the original admin agrees, or circumstances have changed making the action no longer appropriate, or there are strong reasons for regarding the action as wrong. Your edit reversed that, making reverting a block in the face of opposition from the blocking administrator acceptable simply because another administrator would like to see what happens if the block is lifted, rather than because there are strong reasons for overturning the block. In my experience, when a blocking administrator strongly objects to an unblock, the unblock is not undone except after an extended discussion, frequently involving several administrators, reaching a consensus to unblock, so the changed wording that you made does not reflect actual practice. In any case, the present wording has been in existence, as far as I am aware completely uncontroversially, for almost three and a half years, on a well-known page that is very often referred to, which suggests that consensus supports it, or at least accepts it.