I'm glad you're reworking the text; I had reverted you because you deleted a big chunk of content without any comment or explanation.  As to the magazine, if you can provide evidence that it actually has "received plenty of statewide and national recognition" (in reliable sources, hopefully), please provide it and it'll be taken into consideration.  However, the argument "My article is more notable than other ones on here!" isn't given any weight (see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS); at best, it's a reason to nominate those other articles for deletion, not to keep yet another non-notable subject.  As to whether my "research was hasty and presumptious [sic]," the article stated that Outside Bozeman "is often used as a tourism resource" and "is . . . a valuable local and tourist tool," so I had some justification for thinking it a "tourist tool." ''' (talk)