Bill2Phone deletion 

I am unsure why you thought this was blatant advertising g11.

1. The article was product neutral except for the title. With respect to that, all players in this payment space use the words bill to phone
2. There are multiple players providing this kind of payment which means there is an industry that is of value being discussed. The article mentions the multiple players in this industry which means it isn't advertising but informative.
3. Bill2Phone is like paypal and paypal is deemed acceptable.  I would only presume it is because of usage or longevity of the product. (see point 4 and 5 to address this)
4. The article focuses on an industry / payment option that has been in place for 23 years, but is not addressed elsewhere in the wiki thereby making it valuable
5. The industry is in the billions of dollars cleared and settled which makes is significant
6. There were many industry references leading to the history
7. There was no blatant discussion as to benefits of this payment type over other payment types or in comparison to the competition. Therefore there was no blatant advertising.

As I said in the discussion on this piece, I would gladly take suggestions and address. When someone did post, I did address their concerns.  As I haven't looked in the last month, I can't tell if there were other concerns raised.