involved 

Hard to believe you did this, you reinserted text without explanation in this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meir_Kahane&diff;=626285820&oldid;=626285052 and then after your addition was removed and then replaced, you then protected the article with your addition in place https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meir_Kahane&diff;=628477434&oldid;=628439994 is that how you see your position in authority here now, that you can get involved in content disputes and then protect the article at you preferred position? Is his primary notability that he was a felon, no clearly not - if we had to add the same thing to all notable people that had a felon against them as the first thing we said about them there would be uproar and rightly so