Conservapedia

Explaining why anonymous editors can't edit is bias?
Correcting an explanation of the site's purpose and policies (which were deliberately manufactured to attack it) is bias?
Explaining the need for an alternative viewpoint to the liberal lies of evolution and global warming is bias?
Providing a rebuttal against the liberal deceit found in the biased MSM is bias?
Explaining why a copyright policy exists is bias?
Saying that a Christian site in a Christian country is Christian is bias?
I think that my edits were anything but bias, they were correcting the attacks wikipedia made against a rival project, although I have come to expect the deceit that is rampant here. I think you need to rethink your definition of bias, I don't hold high hopes, lack of accountability and a denial of evidence against your liberal philosophies are elements of liberal style