That is a false "balance", similar to cutting the baby in half to share it. I see no reason in policy or good sense for a "compromise" that is a de-facto partial victory for POV-pushers trying to conceal any non-hagiographic content on Tyson. I fear that what you call a "general overview" is one that fails to describe the content of that attack, the follow-on to that attack, the response to that attack, etc. in sufficient detail for a Wikipedia reader to understand the subject. There is already sufficient published content on this subject so that an adequate and contextualized description of the event ought to appear somewhere in Wikipedia. If, as you say, "[t]he Tyson incident is a substantial portion of available Reliable Source discussion of Thefederalist", then, so long as that is true, I think the place for it is here. If this article grows to sufficient length a content fork might become appropriate, but that is not currently a problem that needs to be addressed. Otherwise, where do you suggest it find a home?