I have edited the article which was a large percentage negative (not NPOV) toward Fandango, Inc. for charging a mere $1.50 for using their services.  Of course this should be mentioned, but negative comments did not need to be made about a business actually charging money for their services.  Using Fandago is a convienence, and the phrase "PRICE GOUGING" which was in the article implies that they are charging too much money when consumers have no alternative on how to get the product.  They can go to the theatre box office and avoid paying the $1.50 easily...if they want to not wait in line they choose to patronize Fandango and pay the fee.  Also the fact that "many people" feel that it is unfair is ad populum/hasty generalization that I have never heard about Fandango before (I work for a movie exhibitor and use/talk to others that use Fandango) without any reference other than the author's "first hand" accounting