So should all "other albums" not have a chronology in their infobox? Is there a rule that all albums have to have a chronology, or can it be removed from albums like Cheap Thrills, Strictly Commercial, Beat the Boots, etc? Removing it all together from those articles and leaving the chronology to the official albums seems like a better way of doing things. 

Also, how should The Old Masters fit in? If all three boxes had their own articles (which they don't), the chronology would read:

Thing-Fish • Francesco Zappa • The Old Masters, Box IFrancesco Zappa • The Old Masters, Box I • Frank Zappa Meets the Mothers of Prevention

The Old Masters, Box I • Frank Zappa Meets the Mothers of Prevention • Does Humor Belong in Music?Frank Zappa Meets the Mothers of Prevention • Does Humor Belong in Music? • The Old Masters, Box II

Does Humor Belong in Music? • The Old Masters, Box II • Jazz from HellThe Old Masters, Box II • Jazz from Hell • London Symphony Orchestra, Vol. II

Jazz from Hell • London Symphony Orchestra, Vol. II • The Old Masters, Box IIILondon Symphony Orchestra, Vol. II • The Old Masters, Box III • Guitar

'''The Old Masters, Box III • Guitar • You Can't Do That on Stage Anymore, Vol. 1

The problem is that without an article for each box, a reader going through all albums chronologically would end up stuck on the universal Old Masters page, which currently leads to Beat the Boots chronologically. Another reason getting rid of certain infobox chronologies would make sense. 

(Also, at the risk of seeming rude, I'd like to point out that