I am impressed, Bishonen - the only thing Peterklutz has done is to exercize his right to edit, for whic h he is flipped the finger and told to deliver any complaints he might to someone's dog to chew on (there's an NPA violation if you ever saw one).

Your response?

Ignore everyone and everything but Peterklutz - and ban him. 

When Peterklutz returns from his exile and once again exercizes his right to contribute to wikipedia, in he sees his edits slashed in a matter of minutes in a surprisingly well-coordinted attack by [USer:Askolnick two] [User:Sfacets accounts].  

Seemingly evident to other wikipedia admins, the Modus Operandi witnessed is cause for investigation: two accounts doing reversals two times each against a targeted editor, which gets banned for 3RR violation when protecting his contributions - whilst the two accounts that initiated hostilities gets away scotfree (since they only reverted two times each).

Instead of flying off the handle like some prepub PMS girl, why don't you start acting like an admin and investigate the contribution pattern of the MMY and TM articles in order to determine the frequency of today's MO (as well as what accounts are involved)? When you do this you may also want to investigate the IPs operating the accounts. When you do this, chances are you'll be in for a surprise.

Since you concievably cannot do more to Peterklutz than you already have, he'll now indulge himself by walking the line to a fresh NPA.

Bishonen, you're positively starting to came across as a serious liability and embarrasment for wikipedia. In fact so low is your flaunted level of intelligence that people might actually start to wonder if your account should be part of the investigation regarding ways for single individuals or tight-knit groups of dead-enders to hijack Wikipeda articles indefinitely.

Chew on that, you miserable cow.