As I said, initially when I began to look into this I thought that IHTS might have violated the IBAN by visiting a page that MaxBrowne had edited. I went back to check whether the IBAN might restrict editors from editing the same page (some IBANs do have such a provision) but I saw there was no such provision. Furthermore, IHTS was pretty good about not addressing MaxBrowne either directly or indirectly on that page. That's why my follow-up comment was to declare that there was no violation and that I felt that IHTS didn't go there just because of MaxBrowne, and did so only because of his interest in chess matters. And if I'd concluded there was stalking I would definitely have noted that both at ANI and on IHTS's user talk page. Look again at my comment at ANI where I told MaxBrowne:
""
So I thought I made it clear that this wasn't a stalking incident (again, I thought IHTS was only there because he edits chess articles and areas related to chess), and there was no IBAN violation; he did a very good job of restraining himself from commenting to or about MaxBrowne on that page.  ''''''頭