I'd also be curious to know why my challenging of a source was dismissed. The source was put forward in support of an edit to the content of an article, it was done in a discussion with me involved at the time. The supporting citation was shown to be utterly unreliable, not a whit of the claim was found to have even a passing resemblance to reality. If an Editor wishes to put forward as support for a content edit his claim of an Oxford degree - then the claim will be considered, on its merits. If my questioning the purported superior authority of expertise was against any rule, suggestion or even cultural norm of Wikipedia I would very much like to know this. Please inform me if this even rises to the level of a faux pas. Thank You. 75.49.223.52