THE ARTICLE TITLED THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT IS VERY WELL SOURCED, NOTEABLE, HAS TONS OF REFERENCES, AND SEEMS TO MEET ALL THE CRITERIA.  IT IN NO WAY IS ATTACKING ANY GROUP BUT RATHER IS A FORMAL ARGUMENT THAT IS NEUTRAL AND HAS A STRONG FOOTING IN THE CREATIONISM VS ATHEISM DEBATING SCENE.  IT WILL UNDOUBTABLY WILL BE SWAMPED BY ATHEISTS TRYING TO TAKE IT DOWN AND SITE REASONS WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE ON WIKIPEDIA. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE KEEP IT UP IN ALL FAIRNESS AS A LOT OF WORK HAS WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS ARTICLE AND THE FORMAL ARGUMENT ITSELF. REMINDER  IF IT WASN'T WORTHY AND NO ONE CARED ABOUT IT, IT WOULDNT BE SUCH A TALKED ABOUT TOPIC/ARTICLE OF CONVERSATION.  THANK YOU, AND I HOPE I HAVE MET ALL YOUR STANDARDS. ALSO, ATHEISTS PLEASE DO NOT EDIT OR ATTEMPT TO CENSOR THSI ARTICLE, BUT RATHER IF YOU CAN FEEL YOU CAN DEFEAT THE ARGUMENT LEAVE IT UP AS PROOF THAT IT IS FLAWED...THANK YOU AGAIN