cooperation is asked for but is true cooperation asked for?

I don't have any problem with the NPOV rule.  I just see censorship over and over. Wikipedia is clear:

"None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth." 

Now I have wanted to have cooperation and have good faith efforts on both sides.  I have listened to the other side and taken feedback. I made some changes although admittedly not a lot.  

However, Cooperation may never happen.  Why?

Here is why:

1.  Does MickWest change the theological conservative Christianity  internal link so it goes to the Christian right (Falwell, etc).  Would a person who wants to act in good faith do that?  

2. Would people who act in good faith send harrassing messages ("fundie" etc).  

I think the people calling for cooperation yet saying absolutely nothing publically about the bad behavior of certain parties are not seeking true cooperation.  What they are asking for is the minority view be trampled despite the Wikipedia policy. 

 kdbuffalo