What are you talking about? 

Excuse me, I have no idea what you are talking about.  What do you mean by "stalking"?  I came across The Intruder and thought I could make it a little better.  I reorganized it, put in headings, added some wikilinks, deleted your signature (unlike blogs, Wikipedia editors don't sign articles), and took out some clear violations of WP:NPOV.  How is this stalking?  I haven't followed you around to any articles you have edited and vandalized them.  I don't recall how I came upon the article, my contributions list show it was just after some vandalism reverts  where I often find articles of interest, whether vandalized or not.

Many editors with blogging background don't realize that article listings for movies, books, theatre, etc. are not reviews.  Such quotes as, "'The Intruder' contains William Shatner's best and bravest lead role, played to the hilt, and the hilt disappears into Adam Cramer," are perfectly fine in a review, but not in Wikipedia.  You might want to read Wikipedia policy concerning original research.  If you can find similar sentiments in the print media or other such source, then, by all means, add it and reference it.  Don't worry about getting the format correct, put the information in the article and other editors will fix it up to conform to Wikipedia's manual of style.  You might want to look at other articles for movies to get a feel for the format.  Eventually, the "original research" part of your contribution will be deleted.  If not by me, then by another editor.  I've found it better to anticipate that and write my articles accordingly.

As for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened (2nd nomination), I made my comments and have moved on.  Lots of editors make comments on deletion articles every day.  I have commented on several hundred AfDs (Articles for Deletion).  For the most part, I don't recall what any individual says 5 minutes after I click the save button.  Sorry, but I don't recall your comment, nor whether you are for or against deletion (although, I presume you took the opposite stance from me).  I read enough to get a feel for the arguments, did some research, and came to a decision.  In the past I have pushed delete and the articles were kept.  Other times I pushed for keep and the articles were deleted.  That is the nature of AfD.

Cheers! Talk/Contributions