very little of what is in the source makes sense to anyone besides the part about anarchist, which is the lone passage from the source that has been allow to stay.  i have tried, unsuccessfully, to add material several other passages from the same paragraph.  If you do not think the source is qualified to designate some libertarians as religious fundamentalist, or liberals, why are we keeping the part about anarchist.  if you do not like the way i word something, please rewrite it instead of deleting it without citing a legitimate reason.  if you feel the source is not wp:rs, then let's remove it entirely.