No this is not right. And the entry must be changed back. I never implied that most of the warming wasn't human induced or that most of the warming was human-induced. This is not what the argument was about.

You see if it WAS....... that would have been a reasonable argument. That's probably why you have tried to characterise it in this way. Many arguments have a little bit of promise on either side. This is not one of these arguments. My opposition knows full well that they are lying. That is why they don't debate me directly. The wording should be that it is not all human-induced and not all non-human induced. I didn't have a problem with that. It is the liars who had a problem with that. 

Look I know you wanted to make some sense of it by assuming that we are all reasonble people and that there was a reasonable explanation. But you don't know this crowd. I do. And they were just lying. Or trying to pick a fight.