Question for AGK 

Hi AGK. You mention above that arbcom is anxious for Nina to submit her evidence so that others can rebut it. Nina didn't open this case, LHvU did. He alleges that

"...there is a sustained and possibly co-ordinated campaign to have the Wikipedia article reflect the POV of the "anti-Stratfordians"; providing potential authorship candidates (and one in particular presently) an enhanced (preferably equal) standing within the article to that of Shakespeare.".

Why is the committee not anxious for LHvU to provide his evidence, so that whomever it is that he's accusing of engaging in this conspiracy can rebut his accusations?  Bishonen has called for Nina to be banned for at least a year. Why is the committee not anxious for her to provide her evidence so that Nina can rebut it?

If I were you, Nina, I'd sit tight and wait to see what evidence, if any, is brought against you or anyone else. As things stand, there is no evidence, and no case to answer.