I accept fully that you are entitled to disagree with me. I fully accept that you believed what you were doing to be right, and that by the logic of the RFC it was right. I didn't block for any of that. I believed your mass removing of flags from BLPs was dangerous (and I know you don't share that belief - it may, though discussion, even turn out to be wrong.). I accept that. What I wanted was a discussion as to whether it was dangerous - and how it could be done better. That needed a pause in unflagging BLPs. I didn't block you because you were doing something bad, I blocked in order to pause something I believed to be dangerous. If I'm ever engaged in a mass action you feel dangerous, and if I refuse to pause it to have the manner of my doing it reviewed by others, feel free to block me until I pause. Anyway, I have said that, due to furore it has caused, and the fact that others don't agree that blocking in such circumstances is legitimate, I won't do it again.Scott Mac