Kosh, even if he were to self-revert his warning, it would mean nothing. You're already extremely aware of the Sexology case discretionary sanctions, having been sanctioned under them once already. That's logged on the case page and has been for six months, and unless we're able to wipe the memories in your head somehow, even blanking everything onwiki would not mean that you weren't aware of the discretionary sanctions. As I just asked on my talk page, please consider whether the misunderstanding here is yours.