Your undo of my deletion re: article Jennifer Oneill pic of her speaking at a public forum 

TO MIKE WAZNOWSKI: Look, I was the one ANYWAY who submitted that pic of the subject of the article speaking at a public forum in Washington, D.C. because the prior pic was removed due
to an alleged copyright violation.  So your alleged basis for undoing my deletion was
not justified since I was the original one who submitted the pic in the first
place.This pic which was "nominated for speedy deletion" was taken at a public forum
and submitted in good faith BY ME, but was deleted anyway.  ANDI DID INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION
and did not deem it necessary in the talk history to include this (i.e. info that a prior pic had been deleted) as it did absolutely nothing to contribute to the article. 

I would add that for some unknown reason, you continue to attack me personally and undo virtually all of my edits here. You even undo my edits on the talk page!

You are obviously intent on ENGAGING IN AN EDITING WAR WITH ME and I simply do not know why.

Your editing here consists of nothing more than destructive deletions, undo s, and reverts of virtually everything I have submitted. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" should apply here instead of the motto "If it ain't broke,  fix it until it is."  In other words there is something to be said for leaving well enough alone.  Some folks think something is just not good enough until they get their hands on it to destroy what they can just because they can. There is a place here to be constructive, which you clearly are not being, and this is my opinion which I am expressly calmly, coolly, and politely.