You're actually incorrect - three names of terrorism experts are in the lead who have discredited Mylroie, and no quotes.  There is one quote in the lead which praises her work highly.  Meanwhile, I myself did not add any of these criticisms - they were already on the page, and in the lead, before you began your edits, all of which appear to be heavily biased in favor of presenting Mylroie in a more positive light.  This could be seen as advocacy for the subject, which is explicitly forbidden by Wikipedia.

I do welcome your response and dialogue, as many previous attempts to engage in a discussion with you have failed.  However, to say I am biased is incorrect - I was merely attempting to restore balance to the page that had been upended by your extensive editing towards one point of view.  I've restored the lead to how it was - if you engage in further white-washing, I will revert it. If you continue your non-NPOV edits, that will indicate it's time to get an admin involved. Thank you.