"

User:SandyGeorgia

The discussion is now here  having been persistently deleted from this discussion without one moment's regard or consideration for the absent individuals who initiated and later participated without conclusion thus far.

Nobody has at any time suggested that  

Zeraeph The final deletion was done by a Wikipedi Administrator.  Adminstrators have the final say around here. He told you clearly to take this through proper channels.  

Of course, to do that, you (or someone) would actually have to come up with hard facts pulled from the history of this article.  So far, not a single person, even you, has been able to present a single fact to support any complaint at all.   Even though you have been asked and asked and asked.  To every single request, you claim you are being victimized by people attempting to control and manipulate you.  

This is the fourth time today that you have dragged this topic back onto this page, even after an administrator told you not to.  Your link here is to an Administrative page.  Why?  Why not move this interest that is solely yours onto your own talk page or create a new talk page in your own Wiki pages?  

You are forgetting, I did NOT initiate this discussion. The people who did have a right to expect it not be deleted without resolution.

Their concerns are different from my own and have yet to be addressed.  

Those supposed concerns of others were voiced back in July and neither of them have ever posted again about those supposed concerns, either here or on any of 3 cabals.  It appears that they have zero interest, realizing they were just complaining and their griping had no validity.  After all, their irritation was that Sandy was removing inappropriate unfactual unsubstantiated material in order that this article achieve featured status.  Sandy was Wififying the article for Wiki excellence.

On the administrators page above, you have been instructed by administrators to use ARBCOM instead of this or any other public article talk page.  You have already refused to do so on the grounds that you cannot be expected to unearth her every single improper edit, but no one is asking you to.  Just pull up the last ten - or even the last five times when Sandy has done an obviously inappropriate ungrounded edit in this article (since the ""original complaintants"" have only complained on this talk page).  

Strangely, on my planet, July is not USUALLY considered to include 16 August  and .

Even stranger, you are posting regularly from a shared AOL proxy server  something which would usually be dynamic and not repeated on two consecutive logins and, coincidentally,  

Note this Wiki link -  Where you had already filed your first Cabal against Sandy.  And she is commenting on it on JULY 20th.  Perhaps you can explain where and when you filed that grievance against her?  The one you dropped, requesting  it be closed a day or two later after refusing to give any reasons for your requesting the Cabal.  Your complaints on that occasion were also vague and you refused to give specifics - even to direct any one to articles and dates for reference.   

I think you will find that you were referring to the ""supposed concerns of others were voiced back in July"" which were actually voiced on 16 August  and .  

Here is a little evidence [http://en.wikipe