Grant specifically says that "no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards East Jerusalem seems to have been made at U.N. level. No occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the Golan Heights".
Also, Grant is the only guy I could find who calls UN General Assembly resolutions  "regimes of non-recognition" and I believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral. So not "sourced reliably" and not "written in a neutral style". 
I would also suggest that reverting after a specific BRD request, even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive. I'm sure ArbCom frowns on that sort of thing as well.