After seeing you completely misrepresented my views on ScienceApologist's talk page, I can see why we have a problem here.  The encyclopaedia refuted the undue weight. I cannot have "misrepresented" anything because I directly quoted the text that said "only two Christian writers of the patristic period" and named the two (Lactantius & Cosmas Indicopleustes), opposed to you reverting to an uncited claim of "Some early Christian authors (such as Lactantius, and Cosmas Indicopleustes) insisted on the flat Earth model on scriptural authority as late as the 5th to 6th century, long after the spherical shape of the Earth had become common knowledge in Hellenistic astronomy".  You replaced cited material with a OR/SYN that was uncited, driving a wedge between religion and science by implying bad Christian authors vs. good science, when those two were not the mainstream belief of the time according to the citation you kept removing.