Changes can not get slower than they are.  
 1. You say there was only revert? I think you mean that only involved using the "undo" button. Compare [] and [], with this latter being the last of a series starting here []. So you could say that in two edits, Causteau reverted 4 edits of mine. Of course this was only one recent example. The same pattern continues over months.  
 2. Concerning the approach you suggest, surely this is what I've been trying to do for some months now? You insist on saying that if this is a problem then this must be because there are different opinions about specific facts and sources, but this is not the case at all. Causteau's own explanations to you above make his attitude clear, which is that he'll revert anything he can find a reason to revert and he finds people making lots of edits somehow against Wikipedia policy. If necessary, he'll keep looking for new reasons he can experiment with after others are knocked down, and he is willing to revert before he has his argument together as well, on the basis that people should not be edited until he has had his satisfaction.