.

OK -you are so good at it -why dont you fix the present  grammatical errors. 

I have been asking for qualification of the dormancy for a very long time  , anf or  clarification of its contradiction with article 2  . I refer to the changes of procedure , which  destroyed the  Institution . I think  German speakers could help with that . Cvilised Europeans  should have  an understanding of german- I lack this .

You seem to  be quicker to criticise my language than to have repaired the  ridiculous prior  version. Your edits have now lead to a similar  illogic, see if you can spot it . You alas seem to think that articles on WP should be as brief as possible- does this come from the  nature  of the  Personal Computer format/screen  ?  Does WP have to be childish , abbreviated  ? There are many long articles in Britannica .I remind you that this AE is  much studied in Univerities , and even schools  around the world . It requires therefore, the political  background as it had developed  . And  this investigation of dormancy must be clarified absolutely from  Institutional legislation . I repeat that I have long asked, such as Djmutex , to , to fill us in with a translation of these procedural changes. When , what ,  signed by Hindenburg?  Another decree ? Please supply and include it here, wherever else it may be needed .  Plase  include what Bruning  said about such dormancy- presunmably as this is cardinal , he referred to it at the time and afterwards in his memoirs. And does he confirm the monarchist allegations, I mentioned first so loong ago. You afre so good, please deal with this according to source on B's page when you can . I will visit  elsewhere now .