::::::Actually, he didn't say it "should be entirely removed as an improvement to the article".  He said, "here is my original edit, which removed material that failed WP:PEACOCK. User:Wildhartlivie restored the offending material ... Another user then re-removed the peacock terms, so, as I say, the matter is now resolved." This did indeed resolve the issue of PEACOCK, but was not a bar to reintroducing suitable content in, as you put it, "some modified form" (which conformed to guidelines) to make the appropriate points in the article. ''''''''''