You're confusing neutrality with fallacy.  The evidence against Hamas was woefully understated, which I gladly improved. Syntax is a non-issue here; grammar is hardly an excuse for misinformation.  I changed killing to execution because Hamas orchestrated a systematic execution of Fatah and its supporters.  As in, they lined them up on a wall and shot them in the face.  They weren't simply casualties of war, they were executed as individuals.  Get it?  You being the creator of the article is irrelevant, and in no way gives you ownership of articles - per Wikipedia:Ownership of articles.  You say you are not the owner of the article, but seem to be infatuated with the fact that you started it, and that somehow gives you the right to tell me and everyone how it should be written.  If syntax is your concern, go ahead and edit the article according to your standards of English.  But if that conflicts with my concern for facts and truth, then I will most certainly edit it.  I offered a very lengthy explanation for my edits in the talk section.  Also, I didn't mean to edit your user page template.