Let's face it, "annoying" just doesn't cut it.  Annoying to who?  There are plenty of annoying editors (some in very high places, with effectively zero content).  The Wikipedia test has always been "disruptive".  And to be ethical we should (and usually do) narrow it a little further:- if the folk who are claiming disruption have an option of ignoring it, without damage to the encyclopaedia, then they should do so.  I'm thinking here of a user who got banned, as far as I can see for writing TLDR comments.  All the best:  Farmbrough, 22:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC).