2008 (UTC)
I suppose the entire section is slightly paradoxical, because it deals with the non-technical use of what the article largely treats as a technical term. If someone can find a peer-reviewed statement about who has actually been diagnosed with MDD (which might be a bit of a challenge, given confidentiality laws, so even a peer-reviewed source would probably have to quote the people's own admission to diagnosis), then that'd be great, but for now I've added a footnote in order to reiterate that the section isn't necessarily asserting clinical diagnosis, but rather is listing people who have been at least "socially" diagnosed or "self-diagnosed"which may be what a "sociocultural aspects" section needs to do, anyway. I don't know, but hopefully the section should hold water for now, given the minor word changes and the footnotes.   07:29, 1 August