June 2007 (UTC)

It is extreme POV to say that someone's science degree is worthless. (I don't know what "unaccredited schools" are - there are none in New Zealand.)
"Acting as a scientist" is a very subjective notion. 
Since all non-creation scientists rely on the presumption of naturalism when dealing in "origins" (non-observational) science, which is not subject to the scientific method, then essentially all non-creation scientists are not doing science. But I will allow you to continue calling them scientists.
Creation scientists with PhDs don't have to submit to mainstream dogma in order to be considered scientists; they only do that sometimes to avoid being sacked.
Can you point out any flaw/problem with the disclaimer note itself? nixon 02:16, 14