Thank you, re: Reification 

  Thank you for pointing out that the way in which I was editing was incorrect. I thought that, in order to make original research claims, these needed to be published in journals and then linked-to. I didn't realize that what I had done at the Reification (fallacy) page was advocating for the application of that properly-reviewed research to a topic to which the research was related but not directly about, which then in itself counted as an original extension (and thus, also, original research). It took me a while to understand why this was "bad form," but I got it eventually. I will be more careful in the future. (Should you see this happen again, the policy reference is to WP:ORIGINALSYN.)

Cheers,