That's deluded [A delusion is a fixed belief that is either false, fanciful, or derived from deception] and the only way a person can be that deluded [i refrained from saying anything earlier since it would have been an accusation] is if the person believes their is truth to these statements or believes them himself and you clearly claimed that in your reply. "The intent isn't to insult, and the statement has a basis. If a critical statement has a basis, it qualifies as a criticism.", "He has a basis, grounded in historical facts and his own personal sense of morality, for claiming Muhammad is a mass murderer and a pedophile." study the life of Muhammad before attempting to lecture others on history.

one observation regarding you definition of an insult, many of these where witnessed by Muslims or intended directly at Muslims so if you have no objection we should remove the ones that fall into this category.

Putting aside your warped definition of an insult [which is the equivalent of a tree falling in the woods analogy and if no one heard it [the insult] does it still make a sound [is it still an insult]] these statements are clearly intended as slander, defamatory and anti Islamic propaganda not criticisms which present some sort of argument against the thing being criticized [and not single word labels,slogans, or insults] and that is their intent to ferment an anti Islamic feeling [as you clearly acknowledge above] by manipulating and selectively choosing historical facts or more accurately "Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda. Propaganda can be used as a form of political warfare."

their is NO argument being put forth to appeal to peoples intellect and that is what differentiates criticism from insults, defamatory statements, propaganda and calumny.

You also still haven't replied to this "If a statement is inadmissible for content policy reasons at an article XYZ, then it is also inadmissible at a spinout Criticism of XYZ""