Scientific Creationism in the opening sentence? 

I'm a bit confused regarding the opening sentence and why it uses both "creation science" and "scientific creationism".  I wanted to bring it up here first before editing in case there was some sort of debate or discussion that already happened in the hopes I could get clarification on why we use the phrase "scientific creationism" at all.  Aside from a few books with that title it's clearly not a commonly used synonym for creation science (check the google test after you remove any references to "Scientific Creationism" book titles).  Additionally "Scientific Creation" as a unique term doesn't seem to have any sort of definition and as such just seems pointless and redundant to use in the opener.