"

Message for  and thanks
Dear . Thanks for your comment. I write hereat to send you this message, since I cannot edit elsewhere, for I am blocked indefinitely. I stress that I never used IP anonymous address, since I dedicated my life to truth and I hate secrecy. I live in truth and the light. I had seen this comment on the ANI, which I quote here:
 is currently blocked just for personal attacks and harassment. He may yet achieve a well-formed unblock request and persuade an admin to consider it. If this happens, I suggest that anyone who is tempted to grant it return to ANI to get comments. The multi-year problems with the quality of his editing should be allowed to influence the unblock decision.   03:45, 20 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Query III - Can our block petitions be better submitted to the Arbitration Committee?:  Suggest that his unblock request, if any, be brought back to ANI for comment)
I cannot yet file another appeal for unblock, since, I have yet to ask the blocking administrator the so-called details or ""Bill of Particulars"" of harrassment and personal attack-posting of personal information from the time I was warned on, to the time I was blocked
Here:
Time I was warned:""See WP:OUTING - if you write anything about another editor's real life existence that he/she has not revealed themselves on Wikipedia, you will be blocked immediately.   ""
Time I was blocked -  I was blocked since the blocking administrator ruled using this: ""Posting another person's personal information (legal name, date of birth, social security number, home or workplace address, telephone number, email address, or other contact information, regardless of whether or not the information is actually correct) is harassment, unless that editor voluntarily posts this information, or links to this information, on Wikipedia themselves. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is grounds for an immediate block.""
Relevant rule and policy
""Harassment of other Wikipedians in forums not controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation creates doubt as to whether an editor's on-wiki actions are conducted in good faith. Off-wiki harassment can and will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, the evidence will be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning. Off-wiki privacy violations shall be dealt with particularly severely. Harassment of other Wikipedians through the use of external links is considered equivalent to the posting of personal attacks on Wikipedia. 
I quoted this, since, I will submit here, as evidence, a link, which will prove that I, myself was subject of a Filipino editor's blog - off-wiki harassment, for consideration by the new unblocking administrator.
Tip and Share of Widom, my Wikipedia Legacy
I had never contributed by anonymous IP address. However, I previously contributed not less than 1,000 very good articles to Wikipedia, including not less than 112,000 contructive edits, using another-other usernames and I retired several times. Yes, not less than 12 user-names, since 2005.
Revelation
I first contributed on 2005, using my first User Name. I never revealed any info about myself, but I displayed my email (one of my 50 emails). Why? My agenda here, until today, is to create articles and edit articles which are part of my mission and vision. Upon reaching about 10,000 edits, I retired. Why? Since, I would be flooded with talk pages messages' requests which perturbed my concentration to do my work in my list of to-edits. \
Thus, after I reached the point of being again and again bombarded with messages, I would retire, and seriatim, I would again register a new User