Just because you haven't seen a thing doesn't make it unprecedented or unwarranted. The only argument you've come up with for what value it adds to the article is that someone might someday choose to make it something that isn't worthless if we leave it there. I'm sorry, but that is not a justification for leaving something in an article. I might expand the table if I find the time, but in the meantime there is no reason to keep it. I am by nature an inclusionist; it is not inclusionism versus deletionism. That debate is about retaining or not retaining things perceived by some to have little value. A table that adds nothing to a table it is virtually sitting right on top of is a thing of no value. -