(cont.) Unfortunately, the recent editing of Wikipedia:Public domain does not help this situation.  I had done a search for "images of Nazi regime U.S. copyright law" and been directed via Wapedia (Wikipedia for mobile telephones) to the following section, which was edited recently and has many missing citations and cannot therefore be used as a source for determining the propriety of how to license these images.  See: .  That is a copy of the "content guideline" Wikipedia:Public domain, which has been edited recently by the uploader of the images whose licensing is under review; such edits are highly questionable, as the "content guideline" appears to be edited to support a position re: specific images currently under review (a past or potential edit war): see Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing for guidance.  Editing content guidelines and policy pages in Wikipedia when involved in a difference of viewpoints re: specific content is highly problematic and frowned upon, especially if it is done w/o following WP:CITE and WP:V#Sources.

(cont.)I've added the missing citations templates and an editorial interpolation and a comment explaining the templates on the talk page at in that article's talk page.  This is an alert to the potential problem of a feedback loop occurring in Wikipedia to validate images whose status is still under review pertaining to WP:IUP and WP:PUI.  This is merely an expression of concern; see Wikipedia:Guidelines for controversial articles, already in a template at top.  When adding material to controversial articles or controversial sections of articles or content guidelines in Wikipedia, it is still necessary to avoid violating WP:NOR and to follow WP:V and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; these are core editing policies in Wikipedia.