Verifiability, not truth 

You said:
Coppertwig, I do not think that this line is worth pursuing. The concept of "verifiability not truth" is one of the foundations of Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 
I find this rather puzzling.  I've already said numerous times that I'm satisfied with the longstanding policy wording "verifiability not truth" and have suggested editing WP:ATT to have that wording instead of the new contentious "attributable ... not whether it is true".  When you say you don't think this line is worth pursuing  from other things you've said I don't think you mean you agree with staying with the longstanding wording.  I'm wondering whether you mean that you think the new wording should be kept, in spite of numerous objections, and without discussion?  Could this explain the lack of discussion from proponents of the new wording  is there a belief that the new wording should be kept without discussion?  Could you explain this?