W, the number of editors helping you here is not at issue; neither is (by me at least) the verifiability of the statements and quotes the make up the section.  The balance of the section is what makes it "unfair"; giving so much voice to Dreger's colleague who has made herself a principal in the disputes by campaigning with Bailey on radio and such about this is just too far out of line.  You chose to focus on Dreger's claim that the dispute has a significantly notable "academic freedom" component.  Yet you've resisted mentioning that the commentaries pretty much all disagree with her on many points, including some on this specific one.  I think a good step would be to add a quote from one that disagrees with her on this specific issue.  I've put one such quote on User talk:DarlieB in my discussion with her about that.  I don't know if that's enough to address her concerns; let's wait and see what she had to say.