The real problem is that User:Musical_Linguist has a personal grudge against me and vigorously hunts for and reverts all of my attempts at dialog with the rest of the Wikipeida community.  Clearly, Wikipedia, with 1,000,000 articles is now big enough for the two of us, but she a pretty and polite female and so she has the upper hand.  She seems to have nothing to offer the Bill of attainder aritcle except to hit the undo button if she thinks that I have effected any changes.  Surely, she has a personal motivation directed towards me personally.  That is not really how adminship is supposed to work, is it: that an admin can hold a grudge and personally hunt down an individual other person?  Is there not some mechanism by which she can be instructed to direct her attention away from my activities and let the other 800 Wikipedia admins perform the job of protecting Wikipeida from Andrew William Morrow?  If the problem is truly Andrew William Morrow, then it will be obvious to the other admins, but in fact, that has not been the case.  Oh sure, there has been the occasional problem (if you look at my Wikipedia work as indexed on my web site, you will see that I choose to focus on controversial biographies with a high content of U.S. case law).  This Irish woman has nothing to offer the articles she has personally targeted via this tool Template:Pinktulip except to hit the undo button. She has done no research.  She has conducted no dialog with other editors.  Like you, she always claims to be "too busy" to engage in any actual dialog, but she has plenty of time to sit around and chat with her Catholic pro-life friends and hit the undo button every time she sees non-vandalism contributions that she simply does not like.  As you can see by her user page, she is highly prone to view the work of others through the rather narrow prism of her Pope's worldview.  If you study Special:Contributions/Musical Linguist you will see that she spends many, many hours on Wikiepdia every day and note the quick response time of her reverts: She must be monitoring her watch list vigorously.  Is this really what you want Wikipedia to be about?  Letting admins, no matter how polite, intelligent and pretty impose their worldview on others?  Is it such a tragedy to put some horse-blinders on her to say: "For these specific users and these specific articles, you will stay away.  You have had much more than your fair turn at these specific users and these specific articles and now you, dear and valued admin, are being administratively rotated out of them and you will stay rotated out of them for a good, long time."  Is that such a tragedy?  Fred: It is only a tragedy if the problem is really within the admin herself, rather than within the targeted or banned user(s).  The mature admin would not take such instructions as an insult, but simply as a matter of due course.  Musical Linguist is much like the childless woman hovering over someone else's child, ever-ready to snatch the child and claim it for her own.  It is a natural impulse, but it requies intervention because it is also a disorderly impulse.  All I have done is to flush the woman out by getting her to fill out the "Pinktulip" template completely.  Her contribution to the information content the articles listed in the Pinktulip template is zero, but but she now exerts total control of them.  She is merely a sterile, charming, controlling woman and she should herself now be controlled.  She is all process and no results.  That is not what Wikipeida was supposed to be about.
AWM