As I mentioned earlier, I support this move.

I understand Mark Marathon's concern, and appreciate his clarification, 'he doesn't care enough to oppose the move.' On FAO and peer reviewed journals, I am a regular user of google scholar and such resources, including for past contributions to wiki's sorghum and other staple food articles. Here are a few FAO articles, from southeast Asia to Africa, some in multiple languages, where the authors use Sorghum in the English language title/summary to mean commercial/crop.

Training manual for sweet sorghum

A catalogue of passport and characterization data of sorghum, pearl millet and finger millet germplasm from Zimbabwe

Cultural practices for maize, sorghum and millets

Sorghum and millets in human nutrition - This FAO source supports Mark's comment that Sorghum crop is known by many names, etc. in chapter 1; the authors, nevertheless, use sorghum, and not the other names, in the title and various chapters to mean commercial/crop sorghum.