yes,  Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence certainly is very important, there has been a rather continous effort to change the language. I have been involved in it here and here. Now, instead of following what is recognised by international law, we have some pro-Israeli editors forcing right-wing Israeli views onto WP. See eg what BBC writes about "key terms" , ...and compare that with WP. There is a reason why even my pro-Israeli Scandinavian friends (including journalists) refer to wikipedia as "total crap" when it comes Israel/Palestine issues. Oh well. I don´t know if I will gather any evidence here, though. If so, it would broaden the scope of that arb.com,