You ap[pear to be asserting ownership.  I removed some material and adjusted some other material due to lack of independent evidence of significance.  Please find references from outside of the walled garden of the Seagrave conspiracy theories.  In particular, please show evidence of discussion of the supposed CIA link in independent reliable sources - discussion in major national and historical journals, for example.  Right now you are supporting "several historians" being in support of this theory, but all that is evident to the disinterested observer (I have no history here and am not American) is an amusing conspiracy theory promoted by two people who happen to be historians.  There is no evidence of proper historical rigour, and no evidence of peer-review through journal or textbook publications.  This applies particularly to the 2002 court finding, where you draw directly on primary sources without the benefit of analysis in reliable secondary sources.  Please see WP:ATT, WP:V, WP:RS. Guy ()