As far as I'm concerned, the ANI incident changes nothing as it was not verified to be him to a reasonable degree necessary to take any action.  To consider anything that was said or done from that ANI and use that as a basis for any change from yesterday would be inconsistent with our ideals.  I'm willing to consider any evidence that there has been breach of the terms of the RFC/U, but I will not accept a standard of verification that is different than what I would want the community to use on me if I were accused of the same offense.  As admins and editors, we are duty bound to respect the outcome of the RFC/U, the consensus of the community, until reasonable and reliable evidence is presented that a breach of the terms has occurred.  This principle is larger than any issue with YRC, as it speaks to and defines our character.  - 2¢  ©  Join WER