If it is so simple please do it.  
I am not simply deleting because there is no verification - but also because the tone of the text appears to be boosterism and unencyclopedic with undue weight on minor appearances and highlighting petty details that no-one other than Chahal seems to have made an issue of.  If there are good sources that cover both the factual side of the issue and the due weight side I would love to see them.  then we could edit the piece to be something more encyclopedic.  But my research really hasn't brought up stuff that's more than hype and I have asked over several months for decent references for this type of content so am reluctant to spend more of my time finding sources for somebody else's idea of good content.   SiobhanHansa