, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see what you're saying. I understand. Ok. Thank you for clarification, it was just that it mentions nothing of what titles the rulers children, whether legiitmate or not, would/should have. I find it interesting. Even in our tribe, the Chief' illegitimate children do not have the normal titles of Prince or Princess, but do have certain honorifics. I always like to gain knowledge. Thank you.   18:52