If you aren't going to edit the article, and the facts are not true, then what is your concern?  The article was already previously created, marked for deletion, and then deleted.  Why bother with remarks such as the ones above?  Why not just let the whole thing die?  Also I note that you fail to mention how the categories in question are "personal attacks," if any at all.  I also note that you fail to mention the "grossly inflated weight statistic."  For once can you grow some pelonas and try to back up you accusations with facts or justification?  As far as the article itself, I agree with the deletion.  You are not in the WWE or TNA.  You are an (alleged) referee in a small, barely functioning, independent wrestling organization somewhere in Utah. You are not known outside of that for your behavior in or outside of the ring, and the fact that the original creator of the article had no previous additions to Wikipedia makes his identity a little suspect  suspect, I might add, in being yourself under a sockpuppet.  For all of these reasons and more, I say can the goddamn thing.  This can only get worse before it gets better.