GA Review II 

I'm sorry to say this, but I have to fail this article's GAN. The several major problems that  brought up in this article's previous GA assessment have not been issued. As s/he has said before me, "he article's WP:LEAD should be longer. The History, Media attention, Academics, Student Government, Demographics, Trivia, and Additional Information section are very deficient in citiations. Also, Triva and Additional information should be integrated into the rest of the article." Again, please look over WP:WIAGA and fix these problem, then renominate it for GA-class. However, I have re-assessed this article as B-class, as it does meet B-class criteria. My regards,