Yes, douche, but an article DOES have to be neutral.  Happyme22 has consistently been aggressiv in keeping the Nancy Reagan article skewed towards her favor.  If you check that article's talk page, you will see several admissions by him that he IS clearly in her favor, and that his edits to her article are aggressive in such a manner that there should be no question of his bias.  That you (and other adtiors/administrators) have been so lax in blocking him for making non-NPOV edits to her articleonly goes to prove -again- that Wikipedia is nothing more than a media manipulated brainwashing machine.  Fuck you, Wikipedai, you just lost a user ever.
Yes, douche, but an article DOES have to be neutral.  Happyme22 has consistently been aggressiv in keeping the Nancy Reagan article skewed towards her favor.  If you check that article's talk page, you will see several admissions by him that he IS clearly in her favor, and that his edits to her article are aggressive in such a manner that there should be no question of his bias.  That you (and other adtiors/administrators) have been so lax in blocking him for making non-NPOV edits to her articleonly goes to prove -again- that Wikipedia is nothing more than a media manipulated brainwashing machine.  Fuck you, Wikipedai, you just lost a user ever.
Yes, douche, but an article DOES have to be neutral.  Happyme22 has consistently been aggressiv in keeping the Nancy Reagan article skewed towards her favor.  If you check that article's talk page, you will see several admissions by him that he IS clearly in her favor, and that his edits to her article are aggressive in such a manner that there should be no question of his bias.  That you (and other adtiors/administrators) have been so lax in blocking him for making non-NPOV edits to her articleonly goes to prove -again- that Wikipedia is nothing more than a media manipulated brainwashing machine.  Fuck you, Wikipedai, you just lost a user ever.
Yes, douche, but an article DOES have to be neutral.  Happyme22 has consistently been aggressiv in keeping the Nancy Reagan article skewed towards her favor.  If you check that article's talk page, you will see several admissions by him that he IS clearly in her favor, and that his edits to her article are aggressive in such a manner that there should be no question of his bias.  That you (and other adtiors/administrators) have been so lax in blocking him for making non-NPOV edits to her articleonly goes to prove -again- that Wikipedia is nothing more than a media manipulated brainwashing machine.  Fuck you, Wikipedai, you just lost a user ever.