Rick Ross 

You semi-protected the Ross article. I don't have a problem with that as there had been quite a bit of blood shed in editing the article. However, you restored to the "last good version", undoing quite a bit of good work to the article, including my own (triggered by a post at BLPN). At the point that you protected it, I'm not sure what you (or others?) think was wrong with the article. Is there any reason why you can't undo your restoration, which would put it in the state it was in at the point of semi-protection? Thanks for looking at this.