Concerns on Shiromani version 

User:Kayastha Shiromani has apparently restored the version of the article pre-dating my cleanup, as well as made some additions. Diff is here: . I submit that Shiromani's version is unsuitable on multiple levels, and also undoes a large amount of totally WP-appropriate work I added. Just to touch on a few major points:
Extensive amounts of the Shiromani version are WP:Originan research from ancient texts
A historical image of a Kayastha scribe has been replaced by an image of a god they claim descent from, which is far less informative as to the community itself.
Right in the lede it makes major claims like the only sect who are referred to as direct descendants of a Vedic God with only a blatant fansite, http://chitraguptvanshi.wetpaint.com as a source vice an actual academic work.
Random OR editorialising such as Also, it is but logical to consider the status of the Kayasthas when Sanskrit was the state language under the Hindu Kings.
Frequent non-WP tone, such as honorifics such as "Lord" and a generally promotional slant on this caste
A massive "family tree" of individuals of no clear notability
WP:Primary sources cited as References
A lenghty list of community websites, rather than a short list which also includes more NPOV approaches.

Long/short, I submit it is not appropriate to undo all my improvements and bring back an updated version of the highly flawed older version. If you disagree, we can take this to Dispute Resolution, but I am quite confident that the version I and others have been working on is more neutral.