Regarding References Cited 

Thanks for the heads up.  The reason I changed all those headings was because of the following message left after some of my work:
"This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate."
This implies since I did not do in-line citations that the source material remains unclear and uncited, which is not true, though I understand Wikipedia's policy for standardization.
I do politely disagree that the word "reference" by itself implies internal citation.  It does not.  Many professional journals' ending sections say "References Cited", because "References" by itself could mean simply works used but not cited anywhere.  That is, it is a "referral" to the actual work.  Thus I did not see it as vandalism, but rather, as clarification.
Thanks for reminding me to sign my posts - I mean to, but I forget sometimes.