edit conflictMy Dear (though Furioso) Orlando: In the first diff,  has left you a message about "Masem’s talk."  In my world, a "talk" is a public lecture, typically given at a conference, convention, or educational institution. As you may recall, I gave one of these at Southampton last month on a topic of mutual interest.  In light of that, and of Masem’s Signpost article, I supposed that   referred to something of a similar nature that Masem had delivered. Asking for the citation seemed that natural and polite thing to do. It turns out, Vordox meant "Masem’s talk page"; I've seldom seen that usage in Wikipedia or elsewhere.  I see Vordox is active on Twitter, where they have 129 tweets to their 3 followers and conversations with TotalBiscuit, Masem, CH Sommers,and SargonOfAkkad ; say hi for me!

In the second diff, I am attempting to address concisely a long, long series of talk page contributions, many of them of late by a single editor, which argue for including additional marginal sources sympathetic to Gamergate.  In this particular response, I am pointing out that relaxed standards might have surprising effects, and I use the name of the predominant editor as a metonym for the argument. 

I might also mention that I myself have not complained  at least not publicly  of the numerous efforts that have been made to personalize the dispute on Gamergate's behalf, both on-wiki and off, including previous sections on this talk page, elsewhere on Wikipedia, and at 8chan and reddit and in press releases and correspondence.  I've simply reported them to appropriate parties.