, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

I would have supported your contention generally. SPS claims are not worth much in the face of contrary assertion by neutral third party sources. However, in the absence of contrary assertions, and in the context of list articles where sourcing standards are comparatively quite lax, SPS assertions should be OK as long as we see no reason to doubt those claims ? I would not support inserting something if I had some reason to think it was wrong / misleading, but we seem to have no such reason so far. I have no strong opinions on this particular issue either way, just speaking generally... Regards.  04:15