I'm not defending or advocating anything.  It's about notability.  "What makes Wikipediocracy notable?"  Editors are trying to keep the most visible and notable practice out of the lede for reasons that seem to be defensive about what should go there.  Why do we need to tiptoe around it?  It is what is.  Calling them pedophiles would cross the line without reliable sources and that doesn't seem to be supported and is, of course, a crime.  There should be literally no resistance to pointing out their main avenue of notability -> which is investigating and exposing editors they believe are doing harm.  That's what they do.  That's what they are known for.  I'm not morally weighing whether they are right or wrong, just stating what is the elephant in the room.