The lead section is a summary of the main points, but it mentions her involment in  the Puerto Rican Defend Fund using the political code word "active". I object to this description because I know many "extremely involved" and "active" lawyers and she doesn't fit the profile. According to the Washington Post "The organization's board had a limited role  at bimonthly meetings... it generally left the legal tactics to the dozen or so staff lawyers...."I wouldn't describe [the board] as a bunch of firebrands...Her social activism does not shed light on whether she has, as a trial judge or later on the appellate bench, been a "judicial activist"  the derogatory label conservatives sometimes apply to liberal jurists. 1. But I don't have time to edit or discuss so I supposed is your call, after all your are the "active" and "extremely involved" editor in this article ;) ''''''mundo