Edit war
Hallo.
There is a big discussion (at least 4 years old) about Marco Polo birhplace. There are 2 claims:
a) Marco Polo is born in Venice
b) Marco Polo is born in a small island, in present day Croatia.
a) is reported by all (I wrote all) works on Marco Polo, includuing all (I wrote all) the scholars. Marco Polo clearry wrote to be "Venetian". He refer to Venice as his hometownHi. His father and granfather were Venetians, etc. etc...
b) is a fringe thheory. In about 4 years, not a single valid scientific source, was presented (see talk page).

User Brutal wants to impose a POV. This POV is to present the theory B as trust-able, on the same level of A, but he does not present sources. In the article is written that "the exact birthplace (of Marco) is unknown". That is no true: all the scholars says "born in Venice". Where does this claim come from? I was just asking a source. That why I've inserted CN tags, which are refused as a "POV" by my antagonist. With no discussion!
Now, I', going (sadly) to start an edit war. This is the story (check here)
1) I start a new discussion on talk page 
2) Then, I insert CN tags 
4) I am reverted by B. (POV edits) 
5) I inform you
6) I warn the editor in his own talk page, asking to discuss in talk page.
7) I restore my edit 
Now my antagonist was supposed to discuss in the article talk page, but he refuse. According to me he broke the rules So that:
8) Brutal revert me without discussion
9) I inform you  (with this message)
10) I restore my edit.

Let me know if I did and if I do something wrong. Sorry for the disturb, but I have no aim to break rules. Thank you again.