The following sources are unreliable and should not be used to support statements made in the text:
] is not a reliable source for the statement "largest producer of beauty pageants" and all statements backed up by this source should be removed. 
The ethiopia media site  says "lost her titles as goodwill and hiv ambassador" not that she was stripped of her miss ethiopia world title. This source should be removed.
This tripod site doesn't seem reliable to me and should be removed from the article.
The Tadias site looks fine and is reasonably reliable as support that she was stripped of her title. It would be good to add a couple of other independent news sources though.

The fact that she lost her title: I guess it seems reasonably backed up (Tadias site) and can be used in the article. However, I don't see why it needs to be said again and again. The story is straightforward and doesn't require a lot of words. She was the Miss Ethiopia World for 2003. She was stripped of the title by the Ethiopian Life Foundation when she stayed back in the Philippines after participating in the Nov 2003 Miss Earth contest. End of story. The rest (unsourced statements about Yodit Getahun, future Miss Ethiopias, or about contests that may be held in Ethiopia) is unnecessary. The entire article should be about three short paras. If you have any questions about this opinion, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks!
 (Rose Garden)