:I asked you to ensure you were accurate because if you were wrong WP:SPADE I would accurately call you a liar. User:BullRangifer made a comment that my alleged "use of unreliable sources ... doesn't exactly help your credibility." However this statement was not true at all and has no basis in reality.  It was fabricated simply to damage my credibility.  He says this despite the fact that I had not used any unreliable sources on the page. His poorly thought out and executed statement affects his own credibility rather than mine. When asked for clarification of his accusation, he produces four links. Of the four, two were posted after his offensive comment was made. Therefore, I assume he was taking about the first two links that I had already provided when he said it.  The first two links (both of them) were from of newspaper articles from the Washington Post . Yes both of them!  This person has says that particular source is not reliable and that he can produce MORE reliable sources! that damages HIS credibility -not mine.  I'm calling bullshit on everything he said.  For the reasons above I am calling User:BullRangifer a liar.

 chimes in with his two cents supporting the same contention as the the last discredited guy.  He got his lame comment in before I posted the second two links. Those links were for the Associated Press and Government of Canada (but lots of other reliable places have this stuff).  He didn't back up his statement by responding with the source that he was referring to and lost credibility too. For this reason,  is also a Liar.  That's not all. This person must be the brains of this operation. Right here on this page  puts forth the argument that "And none of this shows that there is no chemtrails conspiracy theory."  I think his credibility was lacking prior to his comment about me.  It's pretty obvious that logical thinking is lacking here too.  Previously I've called his position the "dumbest possible argument for anything (ever)."