Thanks for the advice, but no thanks
Citing an ArbCom case that has not even come near reaching a final decision won't get you far in going against the existing consensus in the articles you're altering.  
Oh thanks, this coming from the "Chief Aider and Abeter" of miscreants, Dan Tobias.  What do you love about cyberstalking, sexual humiliation and harassment, Dan?  It's very obvious it turns you on in some sick way, others have said the same thing in private channels.  Take a look in the mirror, Dan.  

BTW, there is no consensus for including these sleazy sites and even Fred Bauder has stated it.  Can you show me the consensus? For example Wikitruth has articles on notable topics like David Gerard Kelly Martin and FCYTravis do we want to make it easy for people to find this crap?  This is not complicated, Dan.