This is really getting ridiculous. Because since Nomoskedasticity "won't be inundated by Keravelt for a few days " he resorts to propogating  his own NON-NEUTRAL views in the article:
a. He completely ignores the fact that there are views that specifically contest him being CEO (his attorney and the governement). b. He flagrantly misinterprets the Gazette article as reporting Sholom Rubashkin to be the COO (where else did he come up with that idea), while the article clearly reports the US attorneys admitting that they misreported him as CEO (you have not quoted anything to suggest that what I had proven was original research (this all while Mosmof is "guessing this is the sort of minutiae that the defense lawyers ... so I could live with his title listed as CEO" - Original Research?)) c. He then blankly changes the third paragraph's repeated references to Sholom Rubashkin from Vice President to CEO (CEO is contested while Vice President isn't).  d. He changes my clarification of Sholom Rubashkin's exit (that it is disputed by a seocndary source) to simply "Sholom Rubashkin left his post in September 2008" e. He fails to even explain himself in all this.
And no one raises any concern about a Neutral Point Of View.

I am reverting it to my previous edit which is far more accurate than this one (it just omits sources that have been called innaccurate by both his Attorney and the US Attorney