In response to your note on my Talk page, GD: the source is the Philadelphia Inquirer, an eminently reliable source. Describes this whistleblower's testimony as "scathing, though at times vague." No apparent verdict one way or the other on her credibility, other than "scathing, though at times vague." It's worth putting into the article since others are angling for a way to get ACORN's self serving spin doctoring into the article, one way or another, and they weren't under oath.