You appear to have read negative connotations into a simple term which I did not intend to read as such. If you have understood it to be negative, I apologise and will change the wording on the other talk page. It is unnecessary to take a defensive position with me on this split as I have already stated that, "... nothing outside of central European architecture has been developed there..." (sic). What I have stated is what I mean: the content is essentially about Central Europe. Nevertheless, I consider it a matter of courtesy to give fair warning to anyone still involved in the original page as I believe that is what is meant by 'consensus' decisions. I made absolutely no reference to POV problems. For myself, I'm entirely neutral on the matter of this split. If anything, I'm not even certain as to why it was developed as Eastern European-specific in the first instance.