The whole chemical weapons sections is skewed way out of proportion. Contrary to the descriptions of a US company, which was a small Iraqi front company no example of a Singapore company the largest contributor. From reading this one would get the idea the US was the main supplier of raw materials all stemming over the countryside by two Bell helicpoters. This thing is so biased against the US it's almost beyond rescue. The proportions are hopelessly out of context in relation to the amounts and where the chem and biologicals actually came from. 

"By contrast, Alcolac International, for example, a Maryland company, transported thiodiglycol, a mustard gas precursor, to Iraq. Alcolac was small and was successfully prosecuted for its violations of export control law. The firm pleaded guilty in 1989. The Al Haddad trading company of Tennessee delivered 60 tons of DMMP, a chemical used to make sarin, a nerve gas implicated in so-called Gulf War Syndrome. The Al Haddad trading company appears to have been an Iraqi front company."

I'm adding this to the arbitration.