Too technical Comment 

The maintenance template "Too technical" has been removed. I consider large swathes of the article are too technical and incomprehensible.
For instance  what on earth do these statements mean?
  "Tensed sentences, which can neither be translated into synonymous tenseless sentences nor be given tenseless, token-reflexive truth conditions, correspond, if true, to tensed facts."
 "The experience of temporal becoming, like our experience of the external world, is properly regarded as veridical."
 "In the absence of objective distinctions between past, present, and future, the relations ordering events on the tenseless theory are only gratuitously regarded as genuinely temporal relations of earlier/later than."
 "The claim that temporal becoming is mind-dependent is self-defeating, since the subjective illusion of becoming involves itself an objective becoming in the contents of consciousness."
 "Time as it plays a role in physics is a pale abstraction of a richer metaphysical reality, omitting indexical elements such as the "here" and the "now" in the interest of universalizing the formulations of natural laws."
Can anyone make the article more readable and comprehensible? Or are we all pretending that it makes perfect sense, because we're afraid to look unintelligent for not understanding it?