I am going to undertake the rewriting of the article from scratch.  I had originally thought to incorporate some of the short text of the article as it currently stands, but this largely consists of an unconventional and extremely hypothetical personal reading of the poem, which does not accomodate the variety of disparate perspectives which exist on this text, nor even acknowledge that it is indeed just one among many and various interpretations of the poem.  If even it paralleled any given one of the major scholarly readings which exist at present and it cited its source for that reading, it might be useful, but as it is, not much can be made of it, I don't think.