Why? Because I have added a FACT and supported it with 16 references? I hope you have issued the same threats to the other editors involved. If you don't accept any of the references because you deem them "unreliable", then you are welcome to edit the reflist. But that does not mean the edit is invalid or incorrect. You and the likes of your cohorts you're supporting are making a mockery of wikipedia. I am astonished you cannot recognize this. I am reverting to me edit again, despite your threat, and I suggest you moderate your approach and aggression. Edit the reflist, not the edit itself. If you reply to this, it will be deleted without comment.