I don't, but I think that it's fine how it is, as it seems to me that it adds length without adding clarity.  21:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Construction animation
There are links on this article to a Korean heptadecagon construction animation, which is good besides being unable to read it.  But I'm wondering, since Wikipedia should be a repository of knowledge and not a collection of links to other places with that knowledge, should I post a heptadecagon construction animation as I have for other polygons? I'm hesitant because it'd be messy and about 360KB.  21:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)