19 minutes is inordinately fast. You could not have read, investigated and digested this entire incident in that time, you could barely have even read all the diffs and the request even once, properly, even if we stretch good faith by assuming you saw the request instantly and that you would know the precise wordings of WP:SOCK and WP:HARASS off by heart so as not to need to refer back to them. You can continue to make vague assertions that I'm violating the spirit of WP:SOCK all you want, it is what it is, it's you "just sayin'". Nothing more than that. You can carry on ignoring my very simple questions about your & ErrantX's statements here, carry on being sarcastic and insulting to me, it's no skin off my nose, you aren't stopping me doing anything on Wikipedia by playing out this farce. But I'm considering a third request if only for my own satisfaction that this sort of disrespectful, evasive and sarcastic treatment isn't now standard practice among all admins. Hopefully I can find an admin who appreciates the very simple basic expectations that the community puts upon them. If you find long posts hard to read and evidently not worth putting any great thought into, certainly not enough to actually answer any of the points at all (and if anything you only seem moved to respond because I simply noted how long it took you to review) then perhaps you should reconsider whether you've chosen the best area to spend your time volunteering here. I see from your first failed Rfa, and even from your second successful one, that I'm not the only person to wonder if your attitude towards others is fitting for the responsibility for adminship. I also appear to have erred in assuming ErrantX was a long-serving admin, he was only given the bit in February, and people were clearly concerned at his apparent interest in being an admin for being an admins sake. If you both act like this as a norm in your admin activities, then you guys should be very grateful that recall is one of the most broken aspects of Wikipedia. Still, that's definitely a subject for arbcom, and arbcom alone. Unless you like the embarrassment of reading about yourselves on the review, I think 'wikis worst admins' was one of their more recent topics.