, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 Well, i'm also glad that you appear to think i'm admin material, i hope i can rely on your support should i ever be nominated ;). I'm not quite sure if there is any point replying at length, as you have obviously decided your opinion on how i stepped on the toes of the collaborative effort you hoped to achieve. I genuinely regret that, and acknowledge that my actions could be seen as offensive, but i know my intentions were good and I do not feel the need to apologise for proactively editing, encouraging other to do so also and doing my best to stick to Wikipedia policy. I really feel i can't win, however, as firstly i'm accused of ignoring fellow editors and forging my own path without acknowledging others, then when i work with Cesar and praise some of his edits, i'm accused of acting like "a team leader encouraging the troops" and not in a good way, i imagine. If proactivity and a policy of boldness is what offends you, then i believe you may have the problem, and not I.

Despite the unfounded attack below - i'm still very keen to encourage your in put to this article, but i'd really rather not get into anymore finger pointing with you. You may have noticed the great strides the article has made in your absence over the last few days, mainly because we have been being bold and editing. If you are willing to join in, then please do so.  20:44