I appreciate that you're "trying to help," Snowded.  Unfortunately, you are forcing edits that were previously marked as vandalism and attracted Wikipedia administrator intervention.  In doing so, you violated the spirit of cooperation and the rules of this community.  Your comment about WP:OR is very misleading.  That claim is similar to saying that an article about Hong Kong by a leading expert on the city cannot be referenced in an article about China.  Do a Google search for the terms we are discussing and you will see there are over a million results online (a million!) showing the terms in articles about NLP.

You frequently mention rules such as WP:OR but NEVER discuss the merits of the facts.  Is that because the facts don't support your perspective?  You have repeatedly tried to include thirty year old references to books titled things like "The Skeptics Guide" which by title alone express bias.  Meanwhile you repeatedly delete references to the CURRENT faculty of ivy league institutions and articles appearing in psychological journals.  

I read on another website allegations that you are motivated by financial gain because you own a consulting business that puts forward a viewpoint that competes with the subject matter discussed.  I'm in no position to comment on the validity of those allegations, and I'm inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.  However, your recent edits to Wikipedia at best reflect a total lack of understanding of the material you are editing.