I insult you?  No, seriously, I am only pointing out the lunacy of not accepting primary source documentation.  If you get in the way of the crosshairs, then I would suggest finding a different vocation.  I point out that the emperor has no clothes and all Hell descends on me.  And that is the flaw  the fatal flaw  of Wikipedia as it is currently being edited.  

Let's see.  A popular singer and song writer has a web site, and from this website, a fan creates, no, better word, heavily adds to the stub article.  Primary source or secondary source?