Now you are being even more abusive, and you are starting to give me concern that might lead me to take this dispute further. The fact is that you seem to have misunderstood the NPOV policy. I refer you to the NPOV page which states:
Articles without bias describe debates fairly rather than advocating any side of the debate.
Citing newspaper articles has no relevance here. Your edits would have the effect of advocating one side of the debate; that is why they were unacceptable. The statement "It is hardly POV to tell the truth" begs the question over what the truth is. It is a true statement of the facts that the Hutton report was criticized by opponents of the war. It is not any statement of facts that Hutton was a 'whitewash': it is a statement of opinion. I honestly hope you are able to tell the difference between the two.  17:29, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)