:::::Once again, I fail to see what this "wrong" is.  Any problems with the section can be fixed, but there's no call for removing it in its entirely. The idea that "Health care is not an important area to the subject's notability" is, frankly, ludicrous given Beck's prominence in the current health care debate, and the idea that criticism of Beck is some kind of insignificant minority viewpoint is equally ludicrous. The question should be not "should this belong?" but "how should we construct this section?"  To have a small cadre of editors repeatedly revert and delete gives credence to the view that you are acting as gatekeepers to the article and wish to whitewash it.  I don't hold this view at this point, at least for all the editors involved, but if you are going to respond to additions to this manner, you can't be surprised that people are going to think that.