Your point of view is valid and my rv should have been a more detailed "rv deletion of text without prior discussion or concensus"...or something to that effect. As for it being vandalism...the user has been given many warnings and been rv'd by many users(rv's with summaries, popups, VP etc) as his edits have been considered vandalism by quite a few others besides myself. Ignoring all warnings, attempts to dialogue or simple explanations as to why he refuses to got through proper steps(talk pages) before erasing entire sections, the user still continues his single purpose attack on varying articles. I am certainly not a fan of trivia sections either. But they exist throughout Wikipedia and, like any long standing section in any article, needs discussion and concensus before being turfed. Right? Cheers