It is possible that we are having small mistake with this ban4life ?
My thinking is that this edit summary (bye) has been OK, because that is my last edit on english wikipedia.
About my broken english  it is possible only to say that interwiki spammer has accepted my incomprehensible rant and ended his spamming on sh wikipedia. You can read his statement:"Rijecina2: Don´t worry this will notbe a wiki problem. This discussion will help solve existing problems" . Example of July spamiming on sh wikipedia you can look in this link.
When this Juli it has become clear that I will become administrator on sh wikipedia I have started to write warnings on others wikipedia about interwiki spam or vandal problems (interwiki warning example on bosnian wiki from 9 August and I will continue to do this in the future. For me it is hard to imagine that this is disruptive conduct or that administrators (which I am on sh wiki) on other wiki must know good english to write interwiki warning on english wikipedia ?
My proposition is to change definition of this ban4life in:
"Requested by the user on sh.wikipedia as an unwanted SUL local account"
and remove ban4life from user:Rjecina2 on english wikipedia so that I can contact administrators or vandals on english wiki about "small" interwiki problems on sh wiki which have started on english wiki