With all respect, I don't know why people only warn against personal attacks by one editor, in a dispute where rules are clearly being broken all around.  I don't think this is the way to make people feel welcome on Wikipedia.  Chussid should not make personal attacks, but other editors should not revert his multiple changes with curt explanations in the edit history.  Any normal person in Chussid's position would find this behavior extremely aggravating and would very likely resort to personal attacks, which is exactly why this kind of behavior is not allowed.   
Indeed. And the 'reasons' they give are totally outrageous. These same people DO consider www.truepeace.org which ALSO does not give any names or an address of the person(s) behind it a 'reliable source'. Because it fits in their Zionist thinking pattern. JAZ does not. If you ever wanted to know what Jews who oppose Zionism go through, you are having a nice view of it right now.  
"Incitement to riot is not an excuse for rioting." Just because you're bothered about something does not give you the right to cross the boundaries of civility. A discussion can be heated and honest without being incivil  and that's what we require here. ∇∆∇∆