"::: I don't get your point. Could you please elaborate? Are you referring to the verses of hindu scriptures that I added? If so, then I'd like to inform you that the subject of the article is implicitly about the massive animal sacrifice done in the name of Hinduism. The article doesn't focus on anything else. I didn't only cite the scriptures but also other sources that purports to tell what is the real story behind the origin of Gadhimai Festival (I didn't claim it as the sole truth either but it provided a food for thought). If, according to you that is original research, then everything is original research, won't you say? If not in the gadhimai festival article then where should we give a chance to Hinduism as a religion of non-violence? The article attributes all the animal killings of the festival to Hinduism. Isn't that a sufficient ground to shed light on the religion's actual position. Besides, the animal killings of the festival are associated to Hinduism but based on what? Isn't that an original research or a subject of personal opinion too? Thank you I await your reply.  (Talk?)  

"