Admin input:
If you were in communication with an admin, and were actively working on it, you (or the admin) should have actually put a valid hangon message on the talk page. Quite frankly, I don't believe the draft article you're working on is ready to go for the following reasons: 
There's a number of grammar and spelling errors 
Headers should not have caps except for first letter, and should not be wikilinks 
Bolding is for the first use of the subject in the lead paragraph only 
References shouldn't be generalized like you've put them. Individual facts in the article should be footnoted to the references (see WP:FN and WP:CITET if you don't know how to do this) 
The section on "Search engine submission software" should be omitted entirely, as it's covered in a separate article. Don't duplicate material, that's what wiki links are for 
Move the reasons why its notable (media coverage, awards) to the 1st or 2nd paragraph 
Please be aware that wikipedia is not a how-to guide, so instructional information about how to use the software is not appropriate. 
You can eliminate the "further reading", as the book is in the refs (and get rid of the dummies graphic - it's not relevant to the particular program...it looks like you're plugging the book). AKRadeckiSpeaketh  
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Akradecki"