So, you introduce an unnecessary change, when challenged introduce a more complicated version, and now offer to revert to your original. How magnanimous. We get to choose Aussielegend option A or B. THAT IS NOT A COMPROMISE. NONE of your proposals are "simple and efficient". All are both more complex but supply LESS information than 23.X.  Why don't we "give Wikipedia readers the credit they deserve" and see if they can cope with that? And you "didn't expect  expect controversy? You knew it was my edits you were reverting, instead of discussing your concerns first you just bulldozed them aside, you courted controversy.