My dear colleagues-I cannot understand your umbrage. I was reading your sources, and I came to understand that the passage that I was reading was awfully familiar-in fact, the Wikipedia material was a word for word paraphrase of the source with the tenses of verbs changed. I know you will agree with me that it is better to quote the source directly than to paraphrase. Since so I replaced the paraphrase with a quote. Do you object to the quote of your source? I did not choose him I merely followed the footnotes. In following the other footnote, I noticed it had a contrasting view of the origin of the Eucharist and knowing that you would use it as a source I wanted to include it.

If you have changes to make, make them. BRD if he says you can't revert as a piece called once merely because you don't like them