Shapiro is no more notable than medical doctors who have had their licenses suspended, or revoked.  I can think of one doctor (a former doctor of mine) who had his license revoked for killing a woman with the improper use of anesthesia, insurance fraud, falsely advertising he was board certified when he was never eligible to be board certified, and by the time the state attorney got involved (which is what it took to get this doctor's license revoked in ONE state), three criminal counts of sexual assault.  It took 9 years for this doctor to lose his license.  It was in the local newspapers.  Evidently, this all wasn't enough for national news.  And there is no political group called "Overdoctored".  Would any of you think this doctor warrants a WIkipedia entry?  Sadly, there was no news about state medical boards revising their ethics rules.  This man is now in New York, and of course, not practicing medicine - it took awhile for the three other states in which he was licensed to catch up with him.  Yet this man is not infamous.  Why not?  If a lawyer can be castigated in WIkipedia for misleading advertising, why don't we just begin a whole slew of articles about other sleazy lawyers, and doctors, and accountants, and....  Is Wikipedia now a forum for releasing one's own dislike of a particular profession?