Hello Phil. I was unaware I was required to be collegial. But could you please tell me what is uncollegial about including that quote? Is it the inclusion of the (sic) following a misspelling? If so I can correct brew's spelling in the quotation. But I would like to include that quote as it is representative of the bullshit that editors regularly deal with in the topic area. Could you imagine that in a dispute about where a place is an editor would say what the sources say about where that place is is an "irrelevant straw man"? I found it unimaginable and verging on being hilarious, so I would like to include it. So, could you please tell me what is uncollegial about including the quote and further why collegiality is a requirement for what appears on a userpage? The inclusion is not a personal attack, it is not uncivil, it does not violate anything in WP:USERPAGE. It is simply showing, accurately, the views of an editor. Why would that not be allowed? nableezy -