Please show me where in the source the material attributed exists. I couldn't find it. I started a section for such discussions below.   

If any of my fellow editors feel my actions step over the line of civility or produce an environment which retards the development of Wikipedia I urge you to read Disruptive_editing and follow the steps involved in it. Specifically the section "Dealing with disruptive editors". If you are unfamilar with Wikipedia I will endevour to assist you in the process of filing a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct for me. Which, if I am found in serious error, will result in me being blocked or banned. Learning how to use such tools empowers you and makes you a more effective editor IMHO.

For me, leaving unsourced material in an article does not promote NPOV but only confuses readers and dilutes the value of sourced material. I see no possibility of accurately balancing unsourced material from different sides. 

The current version with the unsourced material will remain available, as a previous version, for those editors who wish to find relevant cites in the future. 

This is a level playing field - Verifiability: The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth.