There's the expression: "better to deal with the devil you know, rather than the devil you don't". We understood the original opposition. However, the trouble got worse when those outsiders came in, and the proposed mediation placed the talk-page under extreme police oversight. Prior to that, I think there had been progress in fixing the article, since February, and some of the other editors have been willing to compromise with new details inserted. However, I understand the improvements came at great sacrifice of your time. In the mediation phase, new people contacted their admin friends, and hence, we saw the recent abuses of admin power (deleting new images because they might be rejected at File-for-Deletion; blocking a user for posting a joke, etc.). Meanwhile, if you put similar text in numerous other articles, it does not all get censored: I have been putting fair-use images in other articles for years (I won't mention titles, for fear of targeting). So, if you updated examples in articles about "footprint" anatomy, then details would remain for months unhacked. The only caveat is don't mention those article names here and update so many that people would get tired of following your edits. -Wikid77