Au contraire! I am not attacking you, I was attacking your longstanding tendency to make dramatic, irreversible and unnegotiated changes to articles on what appear to be flimsy grounds. That was all. Judicious, prudent changes to articles can only be welcomed by all sides if they are justified. And if they are made by someone who is not pushing a POV and who knows the subject. Dramatic changes to articles and wholesale deletions of biographies, usually without notice, 'offences' you have repeatedly committed, are NOT sound editorial processes. This at least you should candidly admit. However, if you want something "from the homeopathic side," as you put it, then I can supply some info about the succussion and dynamization of homeopathic drugs and the rationale behind that. I already supplied a short piece on this, but you promptly deleted it in about 12 hours! Certainly, I can rehash it, but give me some time. BTW the references to that piece were entirely drawn from impeccable and the most authoritative sources, even thought they are texts that are not as yet online. thank you. Peter morrell