March 2008 (UTC)
No, that is not the policy. The policy is "don't wait for a consensus." Chuck Marean  
Chuck: I received a note I believe is from you, pointing to User_talk:4.241.18.128 (the note is reproduced there) and asking for an unblock. That IP is not blocked as far as I can tell. Perhaps autoblocked. But I think you (who may not have a clear understanding of how things work) are asking for an unblock of your user. I see in the discussion on this page, and in your contributions, clear evidence that you don't really understand our policies, and have been somewhat disruptive in approach. I urge you to spend time reviewing our policies and practices, if you cannot conform to how things are done, and work collegially with others, you will not be successful here. I see no reason to unblock at this time and would not support an unblock by another admin. I hope that is helpful. ++: t/c 
No, I have never been disruptive at all. Look the word up.Chuck Marean 
Re: your e-mail requesting unblocking
Sorry you have given no reason to why should be unblocked, and unblocks are usually only carried out as you have done with the unblock template above, not private e-mails. kri 16:24, 3