"Colored tables because they're pretty" 

Could someone look into the work done by 7mike5000, such as the colorful, icon-filled table at Eating disorders#Personality_traits?
Do tables like these represent a permissible variation on normal style, or an undesirable cluttering of the page with unnecessary formatting (or something in between)? WhatamIdoing (talk) 
"inquired about the decorative approach at MOS, and the responses can be read here". WhatamIdoing (talk)  

As per WP:Civil, I am asking you in a polite a fashion as possible, to please refrain from making comments such as as the above as it pertains to myself or any contributions I may have made or may make. I believe most people would find that comment to be somewhat disparaging.  And your comment leads to comments like:
"And 7mike5000 would do well not to refer to his colleagues as "anally retentive" in his edit summaries". Tony (talk)  "anal retentive" Freud coined the term not me. A comment like that can easily be construed as implying "or else".

"Yes, the "Skittlepedia" effect is distracting and unprofessional". Dabomb87 (talk)  That speaks for itself.

Wikipedia is for everyone, it was not created for a select few to feel like they can call the shots for the other couple of hundred million English speakers, it is not a cabal.

Your initial comments set the stage, others follow. Constructive criticism I do not mind, to purposely make comments such as the aforementioned I do. I wrote Hemoglobin Lepore syndrome to prove a point to someone in a civil fashion. I believe I made a point with the use of exemplia gratia and and id est. I do not make comments to anyone. I keep to myself. I only respond. So to reiterate please refrain from the sarcasm, and going out of your way to dissect everything I do. Thank you. And have an pleasant day.