Yes, and on that note, I read WP:IMGSIZE, and it specifically states; 
In general, do not use px without very good reason; upright=scaling factor is preferred wherever sensible. Where px is used, the resulting image should be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices in common use.

I do have a "very good reason", the text below the image was unreadable at it's previous size. Additionally, the policy further states that the upsize is not to exceed "500 pixels". I only upsized to 250. Therefor, I did not violate IMGSIZE. However, it appears that the 2 editors, and an admin, that while quoting this policy did not read it. The editors blindly reverts my edit, clearly without bothering to look at the impact of the revert, and now an admin has blindly blocked me for... what? An image policy I did not violate? An edit warring policy I did not violate? A harassment policy I did not violate? There is also an accusation of rudeness, that I dispute. I had, if anything, shown my aggravation at what is becoming a growing problem here. The constant pushing of poorly crafted and poorly understood policies, through the practice of blind reverts, often to the detriment of the article and therefore the project. 

If my comments came across as rude, I do apologize, but the reverts were unnecessary, as was this block. -  ''''