Clearly you need to reread your own policies, from WP:Vandalism, vandalism is:
 Blanking
 Page lengtheningNPOV violations
 Spam 
 Vandalbots 
 Silly vandalism 
 Sneaky vandalism 
 Userspace vandalism 
 Image vandalism 
 Abuse of tags 
 Page move vandalism 
 Link vandalism
 Avoidant vandalism
 Modifying users' comments
 Discussion page vandalism
 Repeated uploading of copyrighted material
 Malicious account creation
 Edit summary vandalism
 Hidden vandalism
I did not do any of those things. In contrast and from the same page, vandalism is not:
 Tests by experimenting users
 Using incorrect wiki markup and manual of style
 NPOV violations
 Making bold edits
 Unintentional misinformation
 Unintentional nonsense
 Stubbornness
 Harassment or personal attacks
 Policy/guideline/essay/other project namespace page alteration
Out of the two lists my edits could only possibly fall into three categories, however I would disagree with two of them:
NPOV violation - I am removing POV from the article by ensuring CP is correctly quoted and that an alternative viewpoint is offered to the liberally biased criticism of the project
Stubbornness - if standing up for the truth and acting as a barrier to the liberal smears rampant on the project makes me stubborn then so be it, but history will judge me as being forced to engage in edit wars against other stubborn editors who refused to consider anything other than their liberal delusions
It is clear that my edits were not vandalism, and in labeling them as such you made a clear personal attack against me for which I demand an apology.