Lone boatman, you have repeatedly removed the word "democracy" from the sentence referenced (cited with the National Review). And you claim that you are not starting an "editing war," but are doing it again. First, you replaced "democracy" with "constitution" to support your argument that Germany's Basic Law is a "constitution," and after I explained that the reference cited was speaking directly of changes which move away from "democracy," (i.e., "The eternity clause establishes that certain things, above all democracy, can never be changed, even by parliament."), and asked you to please not remove the word "democracy," you again removed "democracy" replacing it with "Basic Law". You claim that we must change it because the word "democracy" is too broad. There is nothing "broad" about "democracy," especially when the topic is about protecting "democracy". The eternity clause make specific provisions to protect "democracy" as stated in the article referenced in National Review. Now please leave it, because your changes are repeatedly taking the article off course (off the topic), i.e., the intent of the eternity clause to protect democracy, as stated and referenced in the National Review (cited).