I question the choice of using a standard disambiguation page, rather than what I would think is more appropriate, where precipitation is the meteorological meaning and contains a link to precipitation (chemistry). The vast majority of links to precipitation are going to be for the meteorological meaning IMHO, at least from what I can see from using the "What links here". Unless someone objects, I will consider making this change in a few days or so.  03:56, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)

You're dead right about most of the links going to the weather article. I'm disambiguating ppt at the moment, don't let it put your plan though.  23:52, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

See also my response on the Village pump which is the proper forum for issues like this.  | Talk 12:27, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)Also precipitation is rain forms like hale,snow,sleet and hale

I did post it on the Village Pump but the topic has already been archived (but I did find your reply). My suggested change is one of the standard disambiguation options. It most cases, the current method selected in having a standard disambiguation page works fine for me. In this case, however, I think one of the other options (as pointed out above) is more suitable IMHO. Since the chemistry definition is relatively obscure (to most people I think), I think the most well known definition should be "front and center". Look at London for example.  01:40, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)

 Ha!  Found this after I had mostly replaced all the links with the disambig precipitation