Nice suggestion about the evolution article! j/k. I think in an article about a controversial topic we should include arguements on both sides of an issue, not based on their silliness/validity, but on their appearance in the debate.
Please understand that gay marriage is a relatively new concept for many of us. I am not opposed to gay marriage. I am actually undecided on whether legally using the label "marriage" for gay marriages is a good idea. I am currently leaning towards Marriage privatization, although I'm leary of anything with "privatization" in it's name. I can see why everyone might think that I'm some prop 8 troll or something, but I'm not. I was just reading about the topic on here and felt that there were some issues with the article and wanted to contribute.