I disagree. The minority view in question regards the group of people to whom the term is being applied. You cannot use the 50% plus 1 whenever it is convenient. Minority views are also relevant, and in this case it is a matter of defining the subject by both sides. Please don't turn this around as if I was pushing for the ELF views on the lead of the vegetarianism article. You are the one who is pushing a POV. The FBI is not an authority on terrorism. They cannot define who is a terrorist. That is why we have guidelines such as wp:terrorist and the article on "terrorist organizations" merely points to who classifies who, instead of categorizing through verifiable sources. There is not authority on terrorism, and your version of the article is totally unacceptable. Notable authors such as Noam Chomsky think that the state for whom the FBI works is terrorist and you don't see me pushing for such sort of classification.