Source for Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg 

Hi, Tvengela.  Someone tagged Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg as lacking a source, which means it can be deleted in less than a week.  They should have let you know by dropping the following template here, but they didn't:

Image source problem with Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Anyway, if you took the photo yourself (as I would assume), all you need to do is note that on the image page.  I hope that you read this, because now that Fun Home is a featured article, I'd like to get it onto the front page, but that won't happen if we don't have at least one freely licensed image in the article! — (talk • contribs)