"

It seems that there is some arbitrary erasures of information going on with this page. It takes some time and effort to input this kind of material, so it would be appreciated if such activity were to cease. Otherwise, this geophysicist will not make any further efforts at disseminating information...I have other things to do.
 There is alot of vandalism associated with this page.  This is the nature of the Wikipedia.  I and, no doubt, many others appreciate your contributions to this page.  Please keep helping by adding citations to the facts on this page.   

I think the problem about this page is not only that information is erased, but also that most of the page is now full of rubbish.
 Feel free to remove what you see as rubbish.   

""Rather Messy""?  Who wrote this stuff, a fourth grader who wanted to show off his science report?  

 History 

In the history section, is 100 degrees in Celcius or Fahrenheit?  

 ...another theory 

I removed the recently added section which was referenced to the NU Journal of Discovery, ""No second chance? Can Earth explode as a result of Global Warming?"". A quote from the abstract: ""Overheating the center of the inner core reactor due to the so-called greenhouse effect on the surface of Earth may cause a meltdown condition, an enrichment of nuclear fuel and a gigantic atomic explosion."" Super fringe nonsense from a publish anything webjournal.   

 Please read, and in your case disprove, the theory before making a conclusion. 
Please read reliable sources and explain how the NU Journal of Discovery passes the test.   
 Sorry, I forgot who we are dealing with here, the Arrogant Science Party. How do you propose the theory should be linked to this topic, so people can read about alternative views? 

It isn't a theory. A theory is a scientifically acceptable body of principles that explain phenomena in a reasonable manner. People can read alternative views in thousands of blogs, pseudoscience pieces (books, movies, internet). They have no place in an encyclopedia that relies on reliable, verifiable sources. Cheers   

Your definition is incorrect. Einsteins theory of relativity wasn't accepted at all when he presented it, but it was still a quite valid theory. History is full of people rejected by people with your attitude...   

To be quite honest, were not as stupid as people back in the 15th century. We can actually prove these things with exploration and tests. They couldn't. The world CANNOT explode as a result of Global Warming. Its alot tougher than all these enviromentalists give it credit for, however we can't. It would take some extreme heat to cause any harm to the planet. Just because CO2 levels are at there highest in 20 odd million years doesn't mean the earths getting hotter. It means that we're making CO2. Before, there was nothing to add more CO2 to the atmosphere. Now theres us, and the increase is small but its still the highest in 20 million years. Unless we find a way to turn the air into a thick layer of greenhouse gases, the earth will never heat up more than 10 or so degrees, no matter how long you wait. Its physically impossible, as is the earth exploding. Don't bring crack-pot theories into the equation with unreliable sources, and get your facts straight )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs)  

 As110, There's a theory that there's a secret underground civilization living in the Earth's Core.  It's been in several books.  Please disprove this theory or I will include it.;-)  Then I suggest you read the Wiki on ""Scientific theory"" to find out what a theory actually IS.  The IDEA that ""global warming"" could heat the core enough to cause iron to ""explode"" (chemical explosion?  Deflagration?  Fusion?  Fission?  All of them impossible with iron) isn't even an hypothesis, isn't even pseudo-science.  It's just stupid. ([[User