Ghandi said to be the change you want to see in the world, so I will not try to change Wikipedia for the better, but abstaining critical editors'whose names I will not invoke for you to smearcollective inaction may help it go all the way to the bottom, thereby having no place to go but up.  Don't worry; you're not alone in the cookie jar, so inasmuch as misery loves company, it is not anyone's fault in particular.  That way, everybody can deny their part in disaster, all the while staying silent and pretending the accusations are crazy (or as you prefer, insulting), that you could be wrong, then pretending like everything is all back to normal when the criticism, but not the systemic problem which incites criticism "goes away" for a moment in time.  Fine, upstanding fellow.  At least you're not a suicidal pedophile terrorist cult leader, or is it too much to call Muhammed what he was, a spade for a spade?  Wikipedia is good at skirting around the obvious and explaining it away with filler material to excuse all kinds of abominations to human rights and the part we call "sapiens" after the "homo", rather than "sexual" or "phile" after the "homo".  I will now take my leave and feel fine and fancy free without such a convoluted worry that you lampoon by bearing the admin title and completely making it seem worthless.