POV that the story was really true

Cut from article:

Detainees — held there as a part of the ongoing U.S. prosecution of its War on Terror — had earlier made similar complaints but this was the first time a government source had appeared to confirm the story.

This sentence implies that:
 they've been desecrating the Koran all along
 finally, a source more credible than a prisoner came forward

Therefore, the Newsweek story is true - despite its retraction (under government pressure).

I'd like this Wikipedia article to remain scrupulously neutral on the issue of whether the descration story is true.

To do this, we need to separate the timeline from the immediate incident. We also need to ascribe POV to named sources or at least specified / designated anonymous or confidential sources:  NOT using nuance or insinuation within the article text to make the point!!!  (talk) 14:45, May 18, 2005 (UTC)