I refer to the last time you brought up this argument. No one agreed with you. That was consensus. Actually, that is not consensus. Please read Wp:CON.

If there are notable allegations that this is state terrorism by the US, then please present your sources, quote the relevant wording, and then we can look at it. You keep making claims but when I ask you to support it, you never do. Why is that? I hope this time it will be different. If you notice above, I did. The UN Charter, Article 1 and the UDHR. The ICJ could have found a violation of either - or both. Please respond. Most importantly, the ICJ never mentioned state terrorism.

Yes, and so what is your point? That Chomsky misrepresented the ICJ finding, so he is not a reliable source. Without one reliable source, there can be no discussion of Nicuragua.