Arcamax Publishing

Hey, I don't know of any other way to get a hold of you. You edited out some comments I made on arcamax's entry. Now, I realize that they may have perhaps been a bit harsh. However, if you google the words spam and arcamax, you will see that the company does indeed deceive people into "subscribing" to their "newsletter". Seriously, I receive about four unsolicited emails a day from them. And I haven't been able to block them or even contact someone who would remove me from their "mailings". If you do not inform the public of their "business" practices, I will be forced to change the entry again. This time with ample citations. Contact me at shumich@lycoming.edu to let me know what you think about this "nonconstructive" company that harasses folk like myself. 
On Wikipedia, our job is to provide material backed by reliable and verifiable sources. I don't doubt that Arcamax Publishing may well be sending spam to you, but this edit, where it is described as "Arcamax spam is worse than a bad case of the crabs." is pure opinion. If you can that as a quote from a newspaper or magazine it needs to be reliably sourced, but without that the edit was vandalism and was reverted.   

 From 71.59.225.194 
Don't feel like getting all that snugly-poo with the Wiki deal Mr. Sohn so I'm just chattin toya here'n'now.  Saw a page with Sohn Sohn Sohn and no intuitive way to address you so here is my evil.  I observe that you simply completely reverted to your former writings on alternative housing after I took the time to alter them.  I altered them in such a way as to draw attention to their having been altered.  I observe you have been wronged by your standards Sir.  I hope that among the slew of editorial sabatages you suffer mine were no great blows.     —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.225.194