I didn't want to bring it into the debate as really it's irrelevant but equally I don't want to drag everyone to arbitration on an article we've all spent time trying to perfect simply because a single editor seems to have agendas beyond the quality of the encyclopaedia. Some of the unbalanced, illogical and contrary positions being taken were simply getting too unbelievable! There's only so long you can try to span the divide with someone who wants to blow up every bridge!! Excuse my ignorance though, but what's a 'diffs'?