That is your opinion and you are free to have one. And bear in mind the same reasoning could be applied to most articles of notable people according to what we as individuals deem "tabloid titillating twaddle". Obviously I don't agree. This event, along with daughter's name and her marriage to her cousin is notable and has been covered in various media other than Daily Mail and she has even commented on it. More references can be supplied, if desired. So it is notable, balanced and reliably referenced and it serves little to keep removing this information. I also rephrased it from the original wording as it was not npov so it should stay. Just a part of her personal background.