Please do not accuse me of being a vandal as that is something I am obviously not. Please try to be civil, I appreciate that you've now started a talk page discussion on the matter, as I requested you to do, instead of reverting without a summary Thank you.   
How would you name someone whou would remove content while referring to a non-existent sectiuon of the article, after he had been told that no such section does exist? Thank you. ja_62