Jim Shapiro
Thank you for weighing in.  I could not believe my eyes when I saw this article the other day.  It was the most obvious candidate for speedy deletion as an attack (I did not know one could ask for that at the time) that I have yet seen on WIkipedia.  I did a double take when I saw your comment about Pol Pot  i had missed that in the author's rant.  This attorney is hardly even infamous in his own community, let alone nationally or internationally.  A local newspaper reported about the sanction of the attorney for false advertising.  That is hardly the equivalent of Pol Pot or John Wayne Gacy.  This says volumes about the author, and nothing about the subject of the attack.  It disturbs me that this was even such a battle, and still is.  Never would I have dreamed someone would add such an article and then defend it so vigorously.