Check the Pinter talk page.  I think we're making progress on the whole ref situation.  I've been fixing the formatting.  Jez is going to split the reflist into "References" and "Further Reading" tomorrow.  If you feel up to it, why don't you check the online refs, and see if they really support the proposition for which they are cited in the text.  The refs should be understandable by any reader - one shouldn't have to be a scholar to figure it out.