Au contraire, this is absolutely a question of opinion; namely, yours and mine.  It's interesting that, as a highly experienced Wikipedia user, who seems to relish his ability to quickly attack a newbie whose edites he does not agree with, through the use of the various nuances in Wikipedia (including your accusing me of 'vandalizing', being a 'sock puppet', and whatever ever else you could use to demean and harm my editing efforts from the very first edits I tried to make  including continuously deleting my edits, and then when I innocently put them back in each time you deleted them, labeling me as violating some rule about not replenishing a page more than 3 times in 24 hours, or something like that.)  that after all this, you still aren't satisfied.  You falsely accuse me of some nevarious connection to a website I linked out to, which is clearly not a commercial site.  Just because you tell a big lie, even over and over, does not make it true.  (That trick only works for Republicans =) ) As I said, we'll have to agree to disagree, and let others come to their own conclusions.  I don't want to argue with you about your behavior anymore. It's not what Wikipedia is for.

Let's discuss the merits of the information contained on the page we're here to talk about.  Or, if you aren't an expert on this subject, and cannot make a meaningful contribution in that regard, then maybe you can move on to another subject, where you have some expertise, and let those of us who are more familiar with the subject, discuss it unhindered with your technical maneuverings.

What say you?  Can we lay down the hatchet and move past this?