:::Your comment and judgements were obviously made BEFORE I had a chance to complete my response.  The evidence your provide above shows that you left your length "outside view" not even half way through my response, which means that you could only have actually seen only a tiny fraction of my side of the story before you began typing your so-called "outside view."  And may I ask you again: Were you or were you not previously acquainted with Aeon1006 or any of the UC Riverside article editors prior to leaving your supposedly "outside view?"  ...or perhaps after egregiously violating WP:NPA and WP:AGF above, along with being proven that you left a partisan "outside view" in an RFC, you "don't believe that dialogue...can be productive anymore." (how convenient).