:Hi Abu, (may I call you Abu? it's been so often that we talked lately that we must in the end as a minimum be on a first name basis!), anyway, this time you did your homework well and I respect that. If faced with this kind of facts we must alter the strategy. Good research stands on its own merits and you did well. So I would like to ask you, if I reduce the image size by 70, 50 whatever percentage could that help? I gave MangoJuice the link last time and there is a special category for reduced images. Could you let me know? BTW from last time we had a bit of a debate, and I want to let you know that after the first impressions I have come to respect your capable contributions here. Take care.  

No problem in referring me as Abu. The image is used by Nobel web at 140x198. If we want to make sure that our use of the image doesn't make their use obsolete (i.e: "Wikipedia's Chandrasekhar's bio already has a nice pic, I don't have to go to nobelprize.com's bio in order to see a good pic. There's nothing special about nobelprize.com"), we would have to use the image at a considerable smaller size. But do you think it would still be useful? I see that we would be diminishing nobelprize.com's value whenever we use the image at an web-resolution size, because that's how they make use of this image. Thanks for the second impression! (talk)