So Barnstar Bundy is once again living up to his nickname, that's real big, give him another barnstar for profound contributions! Perhaps he should be so kind though, as to first explain what exactly the consensus he is fantasizing about was and which and how many users consented to it? In the version supported by him it says e.g.: This section appears to contradict itself about the relative dates of reviews. Please help fix this problem. And this is far from the only problem with this section. If, however, someone tries to fix it Barnstar Bundy reverts because he apparently thinks the contradictions represent "consensus". That's some strange logic. Well, qualification does not matter on WP as we have heard. But the question of motivation is important because it is quite obvious that the only reason some people keep editing (reverting) the article is because their purpose is to disparage its subject, which is a criterion for speedy deletion according to Wikipedia:CSD. —78.42.120.74