"

Hey there, I'll be glad to clarify what I mean. There are a few problems I have with the site, and not in and of itself (actually, it looks pretty good and says the same things I would say). First, it appears to be a fan-site, which is not considered reliable enough for use as a source in Wikipedia. This also includes for external links, as the usual case for someone posting such a site here is to promote and drive traffic to it. Second, this type of information belongs in a travel guide, which is something Wikipedia is not. I would actually suggest this site for something like Wikitravel. Again, it's not a bad site, but it's inappropriate here. I would have no problem mentioning this site on the article's talk page, and if consensus wants it in there, then so be it.

I do apologize for using the template, as I do know the general guideline is don't use template warnings for regular contributors. That said, I do hope this makes my reasoning a bit clearer. Please feel free to message me again if you have any questions or additional concerns. Thank you for your contributions, and Happy New Year!  AU93 "