Salon.com is a news organization and should qualify under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NEWSORG.
The Worldnetdaily article  is an editorial penned by Schlafly herself. It should be an RS for her words as quotation.

I want to know why you consider RightWingWatch to be unreliable. They are a news service, and their articles include the audio and direct quotes/transcripts of what they cover. While they have a bias (their purpose to fact-check and cover things in right wing media) that does not, per the RS page, make them unusable especially when they include their sourcing.