", you're infringing owner B. However if picture A is out of copyright you can take your picture C of it, and picture C is your copyright. Which I think is why art galleries ban cameras - they want to sell you their postcards (I think this is right)  

 ""Exactly Chevin"", Thanks...Watch out Boothy doesn't start staulking and deleteing your stuff w/o taking the burden of proof there is a copyright... 

 Which picture?   Incidentally I'm writing about UK law. American law used to be marginally different. For instance to have copyright in the UK you only have show your work to someone, whereas in America I think you have to send it to the Library of Congress - books anyway. Also you used to have claim copyright separately in different countries. Then there's publishing rights, a whole different can of worms.

 I think that a picture such as Image:Pottsville court house.gif is liable to be a double copyvio - of the original postcard (if still in copyright) and of the gif image.

General. I am not sure why Scott and Boothy have put this lot on my talk page. I am watching and will give my considered opionion in due course.   17:50:48, 2005-08-20 (UTC)

 Rollback? 

Hi there! Could you please explain why you rollbacked this? The category was earlier deleted via CFD process. adiant_>|< 12:33, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

 Aren't you supposed to clear a category before you delete it? I have edited the cat taking my precedent from here. In my defence, I would say that {{db|see [[CfD debate]]}} would have been better than {{deleteagain}} which has a rather vague  may have undergone a vote for deletion here - note the missing link. And after ten minutes of hunting I cannot actually find the original CfD debate. But I am not dsperately bothered - if you want to delete it straight away, feel free - but do provide a link to the CfD debate.   13:55:01, 2005-08-23 (UTC)

 Paleoparadoxia

Paleoparadoxia Coming along nice. Regards, Scott

More Pics

""The footpath sign was a result of an abortive attempt to photograph the south portal of the Milford Tunnel - I did not think the golfers would take kindly to my walking across their fairways and I am not sure how else to get to it."" When I went train spotting, I used to walk along the edge of the field at the opposite side off the Milford Road, opposite the signal box. The North Portal is said to be prettier and you seem to have caught it in a rare moment when it wasn't deep in shade. I like 058133 - the train gives it a bit of movement.

There are loads of photos around but they are all copyright. My solution is to link to  websites that are lkely to be permanent. ""Picture the Past"" has a photo of Toadmoor Tunnel which really shows the elliptical shape.

058162 would show Ambergate station as it is now. Belper and Duffield have been similarly erased. 

I'm sure I should know what Chatter is. I have this feeling it's  limestone pebbles from the quarries that you'd use for a driveway. I'll have to ask around, or perhaps we could ask on the ""Voices"" BBC programme that's coming up.  

Are the other images mentioned at http://www.rhaworth.me.uk/4val/058-/buxton05.htm available for GFDL uploading? The Buxton article could certainly use a picture of the cresent.   

 Rob Vincent 

Why did you remove the speedy tag from Rob Vincent? I do not see anything in that article as it stands that looks like a claim of notability to me. Also it appears that you used the admin rollback tool. As I understand it, this is only supposed to be for vandalism. My addition of the speedy tag was in good faith, and in no way vandalism, even if you disagree with it. I have been fairly active on new page patrol and on VfD, and I was active in the debates on the creation of WP:CSD criterion A7. I created . I have also been consistant in advocating strict application of the CSD, not favoring speedy tags on undesireable articles that do not quite meet the criteria. I have made this point several times on VfU and VfD. So I don't think my speedy tags shoul