think the line "it was named one of the best books of 2007 by the New York Times" skews the truth. Following the reference hotlink I discovered that it was picked as one of the best books of 2007 by the" art and architecture critics of The New York Times." The line in the article suggests to the reader a broader endorsement. This line, at least, is written with the biased intention of promoting the book or with the intention of falsely enhancing the book's credibility. I'm having a hard time editing it though, because the line is attached to a list of other Newspaper related endorsements. 
   

I