reverted my edit without comment here, saying in his/her edit "no, even they make it clear that it's 'science abuse', not science".  That's just a silly argument.  First of all, "science abuse" is simply a tongue-in-cheek joke about the nature of the show, not a claim of pseudoscience.  The show does not actually fit the definition of pseudoscience, because it does use the scientific method when doing tests.  They may not run the tests as rigorously as they should for highly reliable results, but the tests are scientific enough for TV.  Furthermore, by Vuo's argument, "horse abuse" doesn't actually use horses.  The show constantly uses science to blow up and otherwise abuse things, so that is another interpretation of "science abuse" that does not indicate pseudoscience.  As such I reverted back to "science".   Ev