I would quite strongly disagree, especially in this case. Not only is it a bad and dangerous precedent that we should not include well-sourced information, I would say that the splitups of the sources here make it all the more important that the information be included, anyone researching this will need it tied together. Leaving out the name would be like leaving out that it happened in Medicine Hat—we probably could still have something of an article, but it would be badly lacking and hamper those who wish to research further. The job of a reference work, first and foremost, is to facilitate research.  Talk to me