Back in the day...before Zlykinskyja got herself banned with her pilgrimrose sign-on...when the trial was still in progress is was reasonable to balance the arguments for Knox's guilt and innocence.   
- Now that she's been found guilty, it seems ridiculous to keep bringing up the arguments for her innocence that were soundly rejected by the trial court.   
- How many times does it need to be said that Knox's Mommy and Daddy don't think she's guilty?   
- How the murder occured is clearly laid out in the judges narrative, and that is what should be lifted into this article to explain this crime.   
- Every piece of evidence does not need a notation attached to it that Knox disagrees. Everyone gets that Knox claims she's innocent.   
- Zlykinskyja needs to get the the court rejected Knox's claim of innocence.   
- Knox has been in prison for what will soon be 3 years for this crime. Every judge at every level on every issue has rules against Knox on this case. There is no miracle that awaits Knox. She's in prison for the crime, and there she will stay.   
-    
- You're wasting your time with Zlykinskyja. She will settle for nothing less than her way. 10 years from now she will her declaring Knox's innocence. She has no interest in compromise on this. As she has clearly shown by continuing to edit the article. She has an agenda, and it doesn't involve being reasonable.