"Journal of Creation - which are peer reviewed by the scientific community and by active working biologists, paelentologists, geologists, researchers, and so on" You made me laugh with this. Thanks for that. Sorry, you have been lied too. From the moment it came out that "journal" has had criticism, not only on its con-tense, but also on the authors and their so called "Peer review". It has zero credentials in the scientific community, and is not a reliable source. Never will be. Secondly please read this page, and the main evolution page. Then read the archive talk pages of evolution. If you still then think evolution has not been observed and have a valid criticism, that could be backed up be reliable resources. Like a real scientific paper. Then get back to us. As at the moment not to be crass, you seem quite ignorant about evolution and even the social controversy that is mostly prominent only in America.