The existence of citations for POV and controversy does not make them NPOV. Sure, in publications that find the controversy to make a good story that will sell magazines, it's practically the entire focus of the story. But that doesn't mean it's a major part of the story in everyday life. Similarly, that stories dwelling on said controversy can find people who make claims about his motives does not mean those claims are actually true, or even widely believed. Magazine writers can spin narratives in line with their own perspectives; we can't. (I might also note that the quote you cite does not actually say the same thing as your paraphrasing, but it really wouldn't matter if it had.) —