And indeed it is mentioned "The consequent failure of South Africa to provide antiretroviral drugs in a timely manner is thought to be responsible for hundreds of thousands of preventable AIDS deaths and HIV infections". Don't get me wrong, I have close African friends who have died of AIDS and I work for a charity which is perhaps the big playest in helping AIDS orphans. But the failure to provide a proper discussion of who said what when still looks like a bit of a failure. e.g. "Duesberg's HIV/AIDS claims have been rejected as incorrect and disproven by the scientific community" should really have a time reference "since been rejected..."  and probably for the sake of ambiguity should say disproven and incorrect etc.   talk