Mild humor based on facts or accepted facts being unencyclopedic and worthy of nuking. 

In the intro paragraph to this article, the last two sentences state the following, "On the DVD commentary for the film one of the commentators claims that George Lucas reassured him that the project would, in twenty years, be seen as a masterpiece. As of the year 2012 the film was still considered one of the worst ever made."

I did happen to see this movie ages ago, and I remember how terrible it was, and it does rank as one of the worst I personally ever saw, now whether that this is widely accepted fact or opinion, I'm not exactly sure, but, if the rest of the facts check out, that a DVD commentator did state that Lucas told him that the project would be considered a masterpiece in 20 years, if *that* can be fully verified, should this comment be able to withstand encyclopedic muster? Or does it deserve to be nuked as a previous editor chose to do? Thoughts??