(UTC)

I also agree that the main discussion should be moved to another article.  The justices of the Oregon Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals have used the "greater free speech protection" phrase so often in their written decisions, that it has essentially become a cliche in legal circles.  Since the U.S. Constitution explicitly permits states to grant rights, in excess of those found at the Federal level, it would seem that linking this section of the article to the article on the Oregon constitution should be sufficient.  22:31, 30 January 2009