I know that the Croatian perspective is somewhat different. This comes from a very specific historiographical school, which had among its roots Grga Novak. Assuming that Dalmatia was one of the most primitive of Europe at the time of Venetian domination, we must also think that since 1797 to the date you specified (1945) they are 150 years. Josip Smodlaka stated in 1911 (1911!) that Dalmatia was still one of the poorest regions of Europe. As you can understand, we can not talk only of the Italian evil foreign rule to explain this fact. I think it is enough the logic to start to demand other questions, which the historiography of your country has not yet met.151.48.28.216      
   
For your info...    
- Marino Bonda considered himself "the Italian podestà of Ragusa", and today is "the last Italian podestà of Ragusa". He never used or accepted the name "Bundic". However, if you want you can croatizate all the names. I suggest: Antonio Bajamonti > Antun Bajamonti; Luigi Lapenna > Alojz Lapennic; Cosimo de Begna Possedaria > Kosimus Benji Posedarski; Lorenzo Benevenia > Lovro Benevenija; Antonio Cippico > Antun Cipiko; Roberto Ghiglianovich > Robert Giljanovic; Natale Krekich > Nale Krekic and so on. Those things are already made by your fellow countrymen in recent years.-151.48.5.145