Tsk tsk...you deleted and basically shoved me aside, without asking me in particular (on the talk page) what my opinion was on the article.  If you have no true interest in an article, let others defend on a proper basis.  Running roughshod over other people is such a fine American way; I guess you've acclimated to the American Dream (now called "the dumbing down of America" by Wikipedia).  How fitting that you should play this game and fulfill expectation of standards that sysops are held to these days.  Dead on with analysis of this place by everybody I encounter, whether educators, coworkers, family members, news reports or clergy.  You prove it with everything you've done or written that I've thus far seen in your editorial history.  Fine job of a self-fulfilling prophecy if I ever knew of one.  Defencive as always, that old canard.  It used to be that honourable people let no controversy be joined to their persons, but held the upper ground from start to finish.  Thank you for your help in improving Wikipedia!