Dori, I appreciate your relatively objective assessment too. Of course, Sarek's statement above is inaccurate, the quoted statements were never made nor represent facts. Company apologists want to say things in the article without supporting it with sources.  Then they want to delete well-sourced statements they don't want the article to include. Several people said they questioned the notability, and fwiw, one of the founder pages, Sage_Weil, was deleted. The sourcing of the article is significantly improved since I got involved, as looking at the edit history shows. Pro-company COI editing has long been a problem there.   

(outdent) Was it appropriate in your opinion, for Sarek to relocate comments at the AfD? Although he moved some of his (incidentally some of the first personally critical comments), he also left some of Scjessey's similarly critical comments in place, as well as making it impossible to follow.