The alleged "multiple issues" do not really exist" 
"It relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject, rather than references from independent authors and third-party publications. Tagged since April 2012."
Comment: not true, it appears to rely primarily on independent sources, such as journals, patents, and books. Primary sources are used primarily for historical purposes to prove dates, not content.
"It may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since April 2012."
Comment: true of nearly all Wikipedia articles, but this one less than most.
"It may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. Tagged since April 2012."
Comment: don't see or find more than just a couple of grammar, style, spelling or punctuation errors.
"Its neutrality is disputed. Tagged since March 2012."
Comment: this article has been extensively edited to preserve neutrality through many, many edits.
"It may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since April 2012"
Comment: actually the article appears of high quality. It appears the commenter making these "multiple issues" allegations is the one who is biased.  burdlaw