When User:Matilda inserted material on war crimes into the John Howard article, it led to edit-warring, page protection, and disruption on the talk page, which still continues. The material turned out to be very poorly sourced. Depending on which way you read the idiosyncratic webpage of the "ICC Action Group", either a submission had not yet been made to the International Criminal Court, in which case the news stories were in error, or it had been submitted twice and rejected twice, in which case it's not worthy of inclusion. These facts emerged in discussion, and I raised a WP:BLP notification, reverting the attempts at inclusion by Matilda and others, believing that WP:BLP permitted immediate removal of poorly-sourced material. The actions of admin Matilda, in ignoring the advice of other users, including fellow admins, in edit-warring, reporting me for 3RR rather than going through the BLPN process, and misrepresenting the situation drew adverse comment, again from fellow admins. (diffs for above required)