"Apparently, as I have contacted both the author of the piece, and the founder of the RAM, they're planning on hosting it on the RAM homepage- so I'll wait until it gets there, *then* link it. Sound okay?" No. You can't do an end around on reliable sources in that fashion. It would still fail on a number of points. If you read RS you'll see why. Stop with the week illogical lawyering to avoid abiding by consensus and to try to get your way. If you truly feel that the other editors' (3 at least on this talk page) evaluation of "moo means hello" and his blog post are inaccurate, i suppose you could take it up at the reliable sources noticeboard. Believe me, you won't get much change there either.