August 2008 

"It includes removing material"
However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself

You didn't read, did you?

"such as those photos you're so upset about, for no valid reason, which you don't have."
Oh i have no reasons? Okay do i still have to explain?

"Which is, I notice, in the quoted section. Cite? Since when does a photo require a cite?"

i'm talking about the actual written content needing cite, not the 40 something redundant photos there. Besides, you don't even seem to own them photos

"And "own"? I don't see you contributing... "

In the form of removing misinformation. Just because you don't see, doesn't mean i haven't contributed.

"Why don't you try adding sources, instead of insults? Oh, wait, I should just kill myself first, because the colors are hurting your eyes."

Where exactly do you find scholastic credible sources on cars..? Lol