Aram-van, what are your latest edit and pointless edit summary supposed to mean? Don't you see an Armenian reference in the text? 

Do you see any logic in opening the sentence with a 19th-century Russian transliteration and then continue your discussion of remote antiquity within the same sentence? Next, how many times should the kingdom of Armenia mentioned within the same passage and in the same context? The article makes it pretty much clear that the area was once part of the Armenian kingdom. Still you insist on keeping your vague wording. What do you mean by "historically"? If you are referring to a particular period of time, go ahead and mention it. I've left a couple of messages on your talk in a futile attempt to lure you on talk pages. Will you ever learn to discuss your changes? Otherwise, I'm afraid I'll be compelled to treat you as a puerile edit-warrior on extremes of Armenian nationalism. Talk