I do respect your views, but what we have here is slow but persistent long term kiddie vandalism.  We did a big rewrite of the article in Aug-Sept 2010, and if you review the last year's edits virtually everything since then has been a vandal revert, usually an anon IP or new user account.  This pattern is why most of the animal articles (cat, dog, pony, etc.) are under permanent semi-protection.  It's an absolute pain in the butt to be constantly reverting this stuff.  It isn't a 15 times a day problem like the current event or celebrity articles, it's just someone adding "p-words" or whatever to the article. (long, heavy sigh).  So if you'd wish to reconsider, that's all I'd ask.  Thanks!(talk)