April 2012 (UTC)
I see we have a file back in its place - I agree I dont really see the need as there is link to the main article, but nor do I see any harm in it being here. However this is not the norm nor is there even an infobox field for it. SO i guess i am impartial about its inclusion or exclusion, but do think a good version should be selected  if  inclusion is the wish of the majority here on this article.   01:12, 22