Disputed: weasel words 

This article seems somewhat subjective and written by someone with a vested or bias stance.  Please see the following items which appear to be subjective:

"Schine and Cohn have long been suspected by historians and gossip mongers Italic textas having had an alleged sexual association, although there has never been any conclusive proof and it is in direct contradiction to Schine's early reputation as a wealthy playboy, contrary to his actual dating life during the same period,Italic text and again would seem contradictory to what Schine did soon after departing from McCarthy and company."

This entire section is in dispute.  There are no citations, and appears to be moving the reader in a specific direction.

"Based on all the known factsItalic text, it was most probably never more than a friendship, in spite of all the attention brought to the topic."

Based on what facts?  Where is the citation?

"By today's standards, the whole question seems somewhat inconsequential, even if it were true, and ironically it would be considered politically incorrect, perhaps even unlawful, to have pursued the issue in the same manner."

This whole sentence is completely irrelevant and lack objectivity.