No problem with a block - gives me time to read up on some stuff. On your advise to contribute to an article, I believe it would be called something ( vandalism?)- don't you agree? Can't figure exactly which comment caused the upset ( The Tomb of ... maybe?), the poppers article, ..... probably just not agreeing with most of the current pet ideas ( I'm shakist on global warming but getting more and more convinced evey day. ) Don't you like the ad hominem of wiki - I've been accused, once I was guilty ( I got frustrated at a blatant lie and deception, but I wouldn't again I hope ), but I think I am more ad hominened against than the ad hominener ). Browsing the editorss pages/comments it appears they seem to dislike the ideas but have a hard time finding a problem ( Do they really think you can cremate a body with it's own fat? This item was finally removed from the article ( Holocaust I think ) but I noticed that it has crept back in ( less prominent but still they wont giveup on Vrba even though Hilberg thinks he is nuts "unreliable". ) I hope that a link to a modern cremation site can clear up the science and facts - however I doubt it ever makes the main article ( which seems immune from the intrusion of science ). I could go on with many more - I always assumed that the talk page was to talk about the subject - not the grammar, etc - If only the same ideas are wanted then maybe the talk pages are redundant - at least on what appears to be politically charged issues. I'll write to Jimbo in a few weeks to see his opinion. Well, good luck - hope it's not too hot out there.