"

 Yet another miscomprehension 

""The settlement of today's Finland after - and already during - the last ice age largely happened via the Norwegian Atlantic coastal areas and from around the ice masses, as those coastal areas became free of the ice first. This is what today is widely accepted, not your view. If there is a historian that you are aware of, who disagrees, please provide the exact source information, including the quote(s) and the matching pages ?""

In fact, everyone disagrees. Northernmost Fennoscandia may have been inhabitated by the way described by Art Dominique/Steve Wondering, but most of Finland gained its population from the southeast and south. This is what is widely accepted. It would be silly to provide ""exact source information"", as any book dealing with Finnish prehistory will tell you this. For starters, check out the book Pohjan poluilla. Suomalaisten juuret nykytutkimuksen valossa (publ. 1999), especially the papers written by Milton Nunez and Christian Carpelan.  

The idea that the Stone Age antiquities in Northernmost Fennoscandia could or should be associated with the Kvens is patently absurd, and not endorsed by any archaeologist I am aware of. 

Only recently you were still disputing and questioning the entire northern settlement route, which all historians widely today approve of.   You tried telling us that nothing had changed in this respect since the ""1960s"".  We are glad to see that you have continued your studies.  - - - -  12:5, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Of course, I have never questioned the northern settlement route, of which I have always been aware. As I have explained million times, ""since the 1960's"" argument was related to the Late Iron Age archaeology. Once again, Steve/Art lies and distorts grotesquely the arguments other commentors. 

User Drieakko - with multiple names - removes comments that criticize him

To the user Drieakko:  That ""vulgar language"" part - women's private part - was an exact quote used by the accused, and copied and pasted here from a past comment.  

You have been accused to be that very person, remember.  That part of the text was now removed - nevertheless -, to please you.  So now, allow the comment to be posted, please !

Furthermore, the first comment (of the two) is not entirely the same at all as the one in the related discussion.  Do not remove it, or any other comments !

> the comments in question have been re-entered below ! 

 

 / Steve Wondering/ Art Dominique, please stop posting duplicate posts on this talk page and on Talk:Kvens of the past. Also, stop the personal attacks and accusations that the editors reverting, removing and challenging your trollish posts are the same person.  

Concerning your claims about my other accounts, please make a request to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser if you suspect any, Otherwise kindly stop that.  

 Or do it in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kven-users.  

Concerning your duplicate posts on several discussion forums, additional copies of your posts will be removed.  

To user , an admitted vandal

The below comment is not a dublicate of any other comment anywhere else (stop vandalism / stop removing this text !).  This an answer to the comment just made by the user  whose vandal tactics were just proven in two comments posted on the discussion page at the Kvens of the past):Yes, yes, check such and such book.  We've heard that before, haven't we.  I happen to be the one, who first introduced here the work you mention above, and you seem to agree, by stating:  

""Northernmost Fennoscandia may have been inhabitated by the way described by Art Dominique/Steve Wondering"".

Do not forget what we are discussing here.  It's the Kvens''', silly !  They indeed are the ones who inhabited the ""Northernmost Fennoscandia"".  So we salute you.  Thank you for that remark ! 

Why don't you now finally begin giving us the exact quotes (+ page numbers) - as has been requested continuously -, when you attempt to present any fin