About the only statement in the above that I whole-heartedly agree with is that there are many other articles on Wikipedia about contemporary artists that are just as biased, if not more so, than Catman Cohen.  Also, the fact that he is anonymous is not at all the basis of my concern about the article.  I don't see why we can't have an article that describes who this artist is and what he is done without veering into an endorsement of him. (talk)