As I mentioned it to you before, you have to read all those posts more carefully. The thing you say here are the same ones that you sayed then, and had no worth, as you were mistaking by not having read the provided data thoroughly.
You need to do that now in order to see what you failed to se then. It is very clear in fact, I saw it the first time I read it, but it can be that you had a "proove-me-right" set of glasses then. Now you have the possibility to see what you failed to see so long ago, so please seize to the occasion, and read it one more time. I am confident that you are able to see it through now.