Comment It would have been helpful to provide links to the sources sited.  Also it is not necessary to provide in-text mention of sources of facts.  Words in 'scare quotes' should not be used in headings, since they raise the question of who is using the term.  Comparing the text with a summary provided by the CSM, I find a few apparent inaccuracies in the text.  The IRS did not flag the 75 groups for review of their tax-exempt status.  Instead they flagged new applications for tax-exempt status for new Tea Party groups formed in the run-up to the 2012 election.  Groups whose main activity is support of political candidates and parties are ineligible for tax-exempt status.  The CSM does not say that asking for donor lists is a "violation of IRS policy", just that it is not typically required.  I do not see either the need to quote so many people.  Just citing Republican and Tea Party sources makes it appear that they are the only ones who hold that opinion.  Why not just summarize the general reaction to the story - that the IRS has abused its power by failing to be "nonpolitical, nonpartisan and neutral."