It is fine to disagree on matters of opinion but facts are facts.  UGG is a registered trademark worldwide [cite to tm list] and the validity of the UGG trademark has been upheld in multiple decisions in multiple countries. [cite to US case] [add cites see me]  Please review these references.  I don’t think this is a debatable issue.  The only reliable contrary reference is the UGH-BOOTS decision in Australia, and that fact is referenced in the revised text.