Bogus argument... your UNAIDS1 reference reflects my point of view, yet you're reading into it your own personal bias. I've explained the key words in that document already a number of times.  When you're not willing to consider my points alongside your own, you're rejecting my argument out of hand without consideration, when your own source is read to back up my position.  And then? When I quoted the reference directly into the page, you reverted that edit, claiming that it was POV, or something like that.  Please read your own sources and see that they state  that TG is not MSM, but is simply considered alongside MSM. (Not, men on the "downlow" wouldn't be "considered alongside" but rather are MSM.)