Processor number - Relevant/irrelevant 

An edit war is brewing over the relevance of Bender's processor.  One person argues that it has no "real world relevance" while I feel that Bender's processor (6502) is a real microprocessor used in early home computers such as Atari and Apple and thus warrants inclusion.  I back this up by the fact that other parts of Bender are listed in the description such as his unit number, serial number, and chassis number.  What argument is there against including his processor type?