While I haven't found the diff I'd hoped, this request by an editor under the same topic ban for permission to edit the Voat article among others has so far been denied. I do find it amusing the editor above, an admitted SPA in the Gamergate topic area, edits Voat while claiming it's unrelated to Gamergate. The connection's clearly identified on this well-curated "Timeline of Gamergate" page; quoting "June 11: Reddit competitor/clone Voat begins to buckle under the increased server strain as a result of the exodus from Reddit, with the new user base trying to rally for Bitcoin payment to help. Voat is now favored by Gamergaters, , and neo-Nazis for some reason." 169.57.0.214