re Gillian Hiscott 

Thank you for your message at my talkpage. Firstly, I would point you toward the discussion that resulted in the article first being deleted; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillian Hiscott. Any text in blue is a link to another Wikipedia page, for instance WP:BIO takes you to the page where the criteria for the inclusion of biographical articles - and in the above instance there was the conclusion that there was insufficient evidence that the article, as written, reached the standards required. I redeleted because it appeared that the decision made at the review was simply being disregarded, and I blocked for much the same reason.

Primarily, the basis of inclusion of articles on Wikipedia is determined by whether they are notable and this notability can be verified by the use of independent and reliable references - and on biographical articles this is more rigorously applied than normal since the there are real life consequences for the subjects if the content is wrong or maliciously included. However, the high setting of standards does mean that even good faith creation of an article that cannot be referenced to a reputable third party source will fail (and there is the question of whether a subject that cannot provide those references is of sufficient stature to be included.)

As I said, perhaps the best course of action to take is to read through the WP help pages (Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, Help:Contents/Links and especially Help:Contents/Policies and guidelines are good places to start) and see if you can create an article in your userspace which conforms to the guidelines.