Neither my edit summary nor my talk page text (subsequently amended) was intended as a bite, it was intended as humour. However I apologise if it has offended.
None of us expect the articles to be perfect initially, that's why we review them and raise the issues on the talk page, so that we can improve the article - sometimes quickly (it might be a trivial matter that someone with local knowledge can resolve quickly), sometimes it might take a while (a response on the talk page says "we don't know, and it might take some time to find out").