SW: as I was going to ask Masem to close the RFC, it dawned on me that it is already closed.  Beeblebox did so when he agreed to summarize it.  Therefore the RFC does not need to be closed again.  The fact that an uninvolved admin has not (nor may never) summarize the results may prove problematic should someone come out of the blue and contest the summaries already contained and endorsed in the RFC.  But, that is something I believe will be unlikely now that GC is gone and even if it does occur, the objections can be dealt with through the usual discussion mechanisms.  So, my new recommendation would be: do nothing except to refer to the RFC as needed in any subsequent policy discussion.