Let me see if I can get any recognition from you of your self delusion. You say in your most recent post I have also said "I am sorry if I am wrong" twice. I've done a search for the word "sorry" and guess what? I do not see it anywhere; nor anything approximating it. So where exactly have you said sorry, other than in your benighted imagination?

You have not in any way substantaited your 'bias' rants. You've merely thrown mud and ducked when asked why. You continue to duck a substantive discussion which would involve you specifying unambiguously this supposed bias, and/or responding to what seem to me to be reasonable explanations for the content inserted (normally along the lines of "the sources back up the assertion"). Why it is you feel okay about making assertions damaging to another wikipedian's reputation, and okay not to substantiate those accusations, is beyond me. 

I see you have amended the wording so as to lose the distinctive phrase I objected to; thank you for that. However the source does not support the assertion you are now making - it says nothing about "learning how to earning a living by gardening." And so I'll remove the sentence once again. If you can get something that is a) not plagiarism and b) supported by the source, then the problem will be over. I note that you had no compunction about removing content I added, but you squeal (like a pig?) when I do the same thing to your content additions. I did not re-add the content you remove. You insist on readding the content I remove. Do you see the disparity there? Is any of this getting through to you?  (talk) 

Do pigs snort? Do humans not snort then they read bullshit? Who knows. Hanging your entire thesis on a snort seems like another sad attempt at misdirection, but if it makes you happy, that's fine.  (talk)