2009 (UTC)
A classic example of the willful ignorance of WP's Jihadist-fundamentalist editors. There is absolutely no effort to take on the substantive points of argument. Instead, argument is sought to be suffocated by a turn to a trivial point of rhetoric. The above editor places all her/his anonymous hopes of an argument on just who Child stated, in passing, was "repeated" by Alcock; without recognizing the petty basis of this claim. Let the editor and her sympathizers search out this pettiness for themselves, as the editor should have obliged herself to do before she so grandiloquently laid out her self-humiliating argument. Rodgarton 12:12, 6 October