bad faith exhibited:

Terms like "fundie" and linking BSF to a political movement the Christian Right which has done some good things but some stupid things also, it shows bad faith.  Calling me a Bible literalist even though I explicitly said I was not is bad faith.  MickWest making imperious edits over and over again until you are told to stop by Mark that is bad faith.  Duncharrris not acknowledging my excellent sources like medical historians, etc is bad faith.  

Not following the minority view policy which says "there is no size limit to Wikipedia" and the minority view can go into "great detail" is bad faith.  I have not attempted to censor the anti-BSF view unless they are making stuff up with no sources and turning the article into a editorital page.  

Now what is the silence about some of these issues but bad faith?  Again, you cannot reason with the unreasonable.

The central issue

Now the anti-BSF wants a mainly popular view article in a minority view article.  I say if you want that start your own article.  I don't really care if you do.  Wikipedia has the minority view article policy whether you like it or not.  

 kdbuffalo