You claim, yet again, that the text "For example India-based iYogi was reported by InfoWorld to use scare tactics and install undesirable software" is not supported by the sources. This is incorrect, as BOTH sources support BOTH these assertions.  "Brian Krebs, a former Washington Post writer who now operates his own blog, Krebs on Security, tested iYogi himself and discovered that the company was indeed using scare tactics to coerce users into signing up. [...] then immediately went into my control panel and deleted what [iYogi] put on my computer [...]"  and "[...] iYogi was using support calls to aggressively sell annual subscriptions [...] proceeded to install an iYogi "tune up" tool called PCDiagnostics".  It took less than 30 seconds to find this information in the sources provided. And yes, it is absolutely appropriate to include sourced information in Wikipedia articles even if it happens to be negative for a certain company. '''' contributions talk