"No, but he still has every right to correct your uncivil behavior."

My beahviour was civil and I contacted Nein about it, I don't need Kww telling me how to do things, the issue was resolved, kww is ust looking for more reasons to weild his uncotnrabble power, by intimadiing me in my sacred talk page, how is that not a violation coinsideirng there is a talk page fot eh dispted article.

"I am. I suggest that you take a deep breath and calm down"

I'm calm as a cucumber.

"Three editors reverted your change and pointed out to you that you had accomplished nothing but adding useless markup to the page"

And as I said the issue was resolved, by contacitc Nein, there was misunderstanding since I thought text were removed. Also just because three people were reverting against me doesn't mean I should back down
for simple being outnumbered. I find it funny that you didn't bring the reasons when you were reverting to explain it to me, you usage of intimidating powers was interesting maybe compensating for something in real-life I don't know.

"I was simply making it clear what the consequences of continuing to do so were."

By disrescpoting me in my talk page? You do realize how absurd you are talking right now

"It's not a topic for the article talk page, simply because you made no contribution to the article."

OHHH? you like playing like this huh? with the whole edit Ihave contrivuted to the Muhammad page is now equal to nothing???

"If you would explain to anyone what you were attempting to do, perhaps someone could help."

 has helped me, I don't need your petty help, I will warn you right now, not to disropect me and talk to my talk page, you got issue son, send it to me before flapping your gums around.