Lack of Follow-Up by User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford on deletion made 26 November 2011 - is confirmed VANDALISM by lack of response after 97 days. 

Mr. Rutherford has made no attempt to answer here about his deletion of sourced content whose veracity is as strong or stronger than what User:Mikenorton (above) assesses as 'reliable sources' (i.e. Orey, Cal (2006) book as source material.) [gleefully he wrote above: "That's much better - I can actually see the wood for the trees now."]  In addition, by implication User:Mikenorton is implying that wikipedia articles themselves are unreliable (as sources).  This is evidence for censorship by User:Mikenorton as well.  If you want to be taken seriously User:Mikenorton I suggest you read and comprehend the deleted material before spouting "misrepresenatations of fact" about the deleted material.