NPOV (August)
Viriditas objects to the inclusion of notable points of view because they are purportedly just "politically motivated attack pieces."  This is untrue, as anyone who reads all of the sourcing I gave can verify, but it is also irrelevant even if it were true.  The film itself is a politically motivated attack piece, and Moore acknowledges as much. It's not the case that only left-wing points of view qualify for inclusion under the NPOV policy. The points of view that are omitted are considerably less fringe than WBAI radio, whose point of view of the importance of the film is given a full paragraph. The way to comply with NPOV is to comply with NPOV, and include all notable points of view, and to comply with LEAD, and describe notable controversies in the lead paragraph.