I suppose you were trying to respond to the above, which was a response to WDM.  You are quite wrong that I have caused chaos in this article.  Nor have I attacked you. I made it plain that for reasons of bias and authorship, your GA review wasn't applicable to this article.  Please also note that when I say "you are biased" that is merely shorthand for saying your suggestions and editing have been biased. That's all I'll say on this subject, except to ask you to read WP:NPA. ——''''''  (Talk Ψ Contribs)