I apologize for not being more clear:  Rotten Tomatoes is the source of the editorial reviews for this article.  It shows 30 rotten reviews and 3 fresh reviews.  Only links and quotes from rotten reviews are included, but links and quotes from fresh reviews are omitted.  In place of "fresh" reviews, there are links to the wiki articles for "religious right, conservative and creationist..." This is where the lack of due weight is per Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view