I renamed the article from "war on" Iraq to "invasion of" Iraq for two reasons:
The article is completely about the decision to invade or not  I saw nothing about reactions to the progress of the war itself or the occupation afterwards, let alone the current Iraqi government's campaign against the insurgents
The phrase "war on" promotes the POV that the purpose (or effect) of the war was against the legitimate interests of the Iraqi people  a position which is not a fact but a point of view still hotly disputed. "Invasion of" carries no such connotation. It's strictly neutral, raising no questions of purpose or legitimacy.  19:10, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)