KNM, I am convinced that MagicMiracle is right in what he/she is saying. The NRN controversy is definitely not absolute. {Reference: Neutral point of view is a fundamental Wikipedia principle. According to Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, NPOV is "absolute and non-negotiable."[1]} Moreover, it is a direct attack on a public figure without legal justification. Unless a court in India finds NRN guilty, Wikipedia cannot include this in the biography section of NRN as it would directly mean that the whole story is a personal vendetta and technically it would also qualify for contempt of the judiciary and defamation. Hope you stop adding stuff not needed. 

Good luck in the future, 
 Neoguru.