Wow, interesting information.  First, let me say that I don't doubt the truth of what you're saying.  However, because the resignation has not yet been published in a reliable source, it qualifies as original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.  Typically, this type of information would have to be removed from an article.  Given that you do have first hand knowledge of the situation, however, I'll leave it in with the "citation needed" tag for now and hopefully a source will be available soon (I'll look tomorrow).  I feel comfortable with leaving the information for a few days with the citation tag while looking for a source, however, another editor could come along and justifiably remove it.  If that happens, we will have to find a source to add it again. ·  talk ·