[unsigned, but by User:Nortonew

First, please sign your comments. Any easy way o do this is to use four of hese symbols in a row: ~

Second, two solitary web references does not prove the legend exists, as it is quite easy for people to create pranks and get them up on websites, or have misheard rumors, and so forth. Wikipedia policy requires verifiability and notability. This article does not cut it in either criteria.

Third, you don't understand the meaning of the word "legend". Some one simply telling a story somewhere does not make something a legend. This particular article sounds more like fakelore instead of folklore.

Fourth, it's your opinion that my edits were wrong, but then you, like a lot of new or infriequent users here, seem to have the ideo that your opinion should overrule other editors with more experience. Note the submission page says that you must accept that other editors with edits and change your article mercilessly and you must agree to that before you submit. If you think my changes or comments were horrible then you are probably way too thin-skinned to be participating at Wikipedia.  21:39, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)