"

The potential for expansion does not justify keeping something that is so short and lacking in context. Donald has already identified two separate articles that contain a lot of information about the 2000 controversy, and United States presidential election, 1876 has a detailed analysis of the double returns from Florida, which covered everything that was in this article until a few moments ago.

If you sufficiently expand the article, I can support keeping it, but it's sad that only a prod got anybody's attention on this article, and it appeared that you had stopped after your burst of edits from Friday. '''''' (talk) "