, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

 Yes, you are right. All of this is of only tangential interest to a Wells biography anyway. As I understand the attack on Wells here, it is as follows. Wells is a Moonie; Moon opposes evolution; evolution opposition is pseudoscience; the scientific community rejects pseudoscience; hence Wells is wrong.
 This reasoning is wrong and offensive. Scientists can debate the merits of Wells's ideas without the name-calling or the strawman attacks.  06:55