Andrew, I only meant to elucidate my agreement.  I find that when people make a generalized statement, such as "you agree," it is often then assumed that agreement is more extensive than it actually is.  My comment was intended to prevent this misunderstanding.
Also, I think it's quite clear from my suggestions of renaming or creating articles that I am absolutely willing to work with everyone here to resolve this issue; I am not defending this article "no matter what."  But there really hasn't been a serious proposal other than turning this page into a second TA article, which I've opposed, citing appropriate policies.  It takes two to tango...  2600:100E:B101:C9F2:0:0:0:103