Irredentist edits in Wikipedia pages 

I found several innovations and new WIKI rules applied by some users, that violates the normal comportament of editors. 
These estonishing edits were made by some editors who managed to block all oponents using gang tactics and misinformation of administrators.

See next page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Origin_of_the_Romanians&action;=history

(cur | prev) 17:40, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (110,912 bytes) (-995)‎ . . (→‎Further reading: -books written before WWII)
(cur | prev) 17:39, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (111,907 bytes) (+1)‎ . . (-unreferred (non-English) source; +the deleted source English version)
(cur | prev) 17:36, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (111,906 bytes) (-158)‎ . . (→‎Secondary sources: -unreferred source which was written before WWII)
(cur | prev) 17:35, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (112,064 bytes) (-636)‎ . . (→‎Theory of Daco-Romanian continuity: WP:NPOV (this section presents the scholars' views, not their argumentation ))
(cur | prev) 17:32, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (112,700 bytes) (-634)‎ . . (→‎Theories on the Romanians' ethnogenesis: there is no need to add scholars' POV of their opponents' POV (X does not accept Y's view and says that Y's view is exclusivelly based on Y's biased, stupid, .. approach) .)
(cur | prev) 17:28, 18 November 2014‎ Borsoka (talk | contribs)‎ . . (113,334 bytes) (-346)‎ . . (→‎Theories on the Romanians' ethnogenesis: unrelevant information (and the two specialist mentioned in connection with the immigrationist theory are not Hungarians - and more non-Hungarian scholar could be added))

All these edits show the real character of the editor named Borsoka. He is considered as an irredentist editor by Romanians, Ukrainian and Serb editors.

Amazing reasons to erase Romanian references and Romanian historians text:
1. Book before WW 2   !
2. Non English reference    !
3. Scholar's view  and not scholar's argumentation (here original research of Borsoka)
4. There is no need to add scholars' POV of their opponents (but in his Hungarian history pages there are a lot of such opinions)
5. Stupid approach   (new original research of Borsoka about Romanian references)
6. Specialists are not Hungarians !

Also the user Fakirbakir erased several Romanian references because he considered 
that he personally disagree the opinions of the Romanian author and if he disagrees an author (here about Georgescu, a historian) he erases it from WIKI pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Origin_of_the_Romanians  (section Georgescu's statement)
"I have to disagree with Georgescu's statement".

There is a simple explanation of these amazing innovations and new Wikipedia rules:
The two editors Borsoka and Fakirbakir act as a gang against editors from neighboring countries and act alternatively to avoid the 3RR rule and to eliminate
single editors. Their scope: to emphasize the priority in history of Hungarians; this is a part of the definition of IRREDENTISM: to show the priority in history, against neigbouring countries.

All these reasons made the mentioned history article to be of very bad quality due to irredentist edits. Some Romanian journals wrote about these activities in the Wikipedia pages and so Wikipedia is considered as an unreliable source for history due to these amazing edits. Unfortunately no administrator acted against these tactics.
I mentioned you the vandalism in the mentioned pages but no result.