I'm sorry that you have come to the erroneous conclusion that I don't understand the issue at hand, even after I took the time to explain to you at length the true situation. Perhaps you can confirm that your edit summary at (1) and (2) was "coordinate test". If it was something else, please provide the relevant diffs. If you didn't really say "we should avoid starting to use this one, until we are sure we want it.", please says so, so that we can find out who entered thsoe words, in your name, on WT:GEO. If you didn't label coordinate as "Currently not implemented", pelase say so, os that we can find ut who labelled created the template's documentation with those words, in an edit seemingly made from your account. If you do not do so, I shall consider the matter closed.

With regard to your numbered points above:

 Thank you for confirming that my revert didn't break the template; it was already broken. If you repaired it, you should have said so in your edit summary, rather than just labelling it "coordinate test". If you wished to repair it and implement a test, you would have been wise to do so in to separate, and clearly labelled , edits, so that your test could be reverted separately.
 Ditto.
 Your use of "should" here is incorrect; "should" expresses a advisory or mandatory position, you are expressing an opinion. 
 You again make a pejorative and fallacious insinuation that my understanding is deficient, Kindly desist. You also ignore my point about the data provided at GeoTemplate. 

Your claim that my reversal of your "test" edits, clearly labelled as such, is POINT is mistaken (anyone can see in edit histories that I have replaced every instance of coordinate in article space, including the majority not initiated by you). The were not 10,000 instances of coordinate, as you well know. Likewise my edits to implement a standard template in place of one deprecated by consensus. Since you were the only person opposing that consensus, the POINT edits seem to be yours. My edit history shows multiple instances of me converting other coordinates templates on pages you have not edited. Kindly desist from making false slurs. If you have any evidence to support your slurs, take the matter back to WP:ANI, where my edits, contested by you, have already been described as "fine", not least in the light of your "incivility and disruptive editing".  (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits  

  (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits