(UTC)
 Responding to "holy hell" above: Hi, I'm one of the OnTheIssues editors, so I'll cite some counter-evidence, as  suggests. First, the basis of the website is the VoteMatch quiz (I'll be adding a paragraph about that next weekend for the Notability discussion)  that is based on a Libertarian Party favorite called the Nolan Chart. Unlike the Nolan Chart, which is arranged as a [[push poll] to promote libertarianism, we arrange VoteMatch so that conservatives and liberals have the same number of "yes" answers. Furthermore, if you look at who OnTheIssues covers, it scrupulously includes liberals, conservatives, libertarians, greens, and far more right-leaning AND left-leaning candidates than the mainstream press does. FYI, I get incoming email accusing OnTheIssues of being left-leaning about as often as an accusation of being right-leaning. My response is always to challenge the write to find better coverage of right-leaning candidates on Fox News, or to find better coverage of left-leaning candidates on CNN  the mainstream media on BOTH sides cover their OWN candidates' issue stances less than OnTheIssues does! If that's "leaning", then I guess OnTheIssues leans  but I'd call it "good journalism!"   23:08, 4 March 2014