IP 123:  you have added text for the third time on neurofeedback, after the notice above and an explanation of WP:3RR and Wikipedia's medical sourcing requirements was posted to your talk page.  
 Please review WP:3RR and do not reinstate text without gaining consensus.  Again, please note that 3RR is not a license to read contested text three times, and that it pertains to an individual, not an IP address or account.
 Please read WP:MEDRS; if you can locate a secondary review (most likely listed at PubMed that mentions success with neurofeedback for TS, we can discuss it.  I have most of the recent reviews and am aware of no secondary review of TS that mentions success with neurofeedback.
  Please review WP:NOTNEWS; publishing unreviewed recent research is unencylcopedic.
 Please review WP:OR; "one could argue" isn't how Wikipedia articles are written.
 Perhaps it is time to request protection of the article?   (Talk)