Non-Scientific 

I guess this article breaks just about every rule there every was about Scientific Method proving empirically that the study of biological systems is what's evolutionary, and that the self-appointed experts are just at the beginning of the rationality / knowledge curve and not at the conclusion, as they often make believe.  This is really sad.  It's sad because with the kind of dogma, unsupported by facts, that this article contains, there is two steps backwards for every step forward.  Evolutionary biologists really need to clean up their act and get serious. There is no credibility here compared to other hard sciences.  They should take a note from physicists and chemists and really do more to prove their work, instead of just transfixing themselves on convenient hypothesis and staking unsupportable claims.