:::::Unaware of further talk page discussion, I reverted William F. Connolly.  However, even after reading the discussion it seems reasonable to me.  Other than the CNN source, they seem to be OK.  Furthermore, I certainly have to agree with Binsternet's statement, "Let's not see the goalposts repositioned afterward, making my effort for naught."  Again and again on this talk page we have heard from Rangoon that any disagreement with her opinion is just a waste of time.  We all value our time and don't like to see it wasted.  Hopefully we can all look to WP policy which dictates that the lead give a summary of the article.