The rules are not going to be bent for you and they most certainly shouldn't.  The term is non-notable no matter how you look at it, even you admit that you just invented the term yourself.  In order for a term to be notable, there needs to be more than a very tiny number (mostly just you) of people using it.  It's not helpful, it just serves to confuse people since "inverse ad hominem" implies that it's opposite to ad hominem, which it's not.  It's just saying "I have superior credentials" instead of saying "You have inferior credentials."  There is no difference as far as logic is concerned.  8 July 2005 01:20 (UTC)