Blimey, I  get so annoyed. Kafka Liz is incorrect in believing I would simply be 'adding my personal viewpoint' or an 'original critique' ! that's absurd. The article as it stands,  for all that Modernist says - 'it's about a painting, not a book' mentions, quite rightly, the views and understandings of Boschs art gleaned from many books. All I would seek to be adding, to make the overview completer would be the views of another writer who has carried out years of research, namely Lynda Harris. As it stands the article is kind of internally inconsistent, if it maintains a painter with orthodox beliefs in an omnipotent and beneficent god painted it,and yet is happy to admit it looks here as if the (horrible looking) Creation, ' is slipping beyond his control.' I feel like I'm facing a cabal here. Modernist has his own POV too you know and a tendentious use of language. 'G-D', 'gimmicky', whats all that about if not POV? Probably I wont seek to add anything then but if I do I repeat it wont be 'original research' or my 'personal point of view' Kafka Liz, get it right, and if i do I'll put it on this page first and if it is judged o.k then .o.k