Random tagging 

Your revert of my "random tagging" was rather disappointing behaviour, for someone with so many GAs I would have thought you would apply some common sense and actually look at the tags in question and the problems identified with several sources, rather that claim ownership of the article as top contributor. Needless to say that when one source leads to a 404 page and another is some commercial menu which does not match the citation because it has probably been removed and defaults to a home page, that is not "random", it is logically applied tagging based on factual concerns regarding the citations. Please don't waste my time making bullish reverts without first being aware of the problems, you're not the only person in the world with a right to contribute towards that or any other article, which, sorry to say, is pretty abysmal quality. Also, the link to cowboy worded as vaquero could be considered an WP:EGG, but it's also a pointless one as the latter article exists and there are differences between a cowboy and a vaquero, so the American word should not be used to mask the Iberian version of a cattleman if that's not what it means - there is an entire Atlantic Ocean and several thousand miles between them. 82.8.252.13