":::::: Again, most of that is gibberish to me, but the first place to begin sorting it might be ... I do not know why BogHog changed to vcite or to vcite2 after he took over maintaining the Diberri tool.  Nor do I know what that means in every case.  The case I know about is that autism used vcite instead of cite because of load time issues (Eubulides developed vcite for that purpose, but Eubulides is gone), and I remember at some point having a conversation with BogHog about the vcite vs vcite2 issues ... but the rest fades in memory.  That may or may not mean BogHog explained it all to me once  ... and I may or may not have understood at the time.  When I use Boghog's new Diberri tool, I edit the output to use the old standard form, for consistency in citation style.  And I continue to use the vcite format in the autism suite.  That we now have a mix on FAs is because new editors may not always respect CITEVAR, and I may not catch them all. But there was once a clear standard across almost all medical content, and is being systematically deteriorated to an inconsistent style that creates bloat and is hard to edit around.   (Talk) 

"