Concerns about some recent edits 

Alas, one of my recent edits was undone by , with the summary "You removed the most relaible sources from the article. Please don't force edits being discussed". Which is baffling as it's encyclotadd "forcing" edits , and the sources removed by encyclotadd are by far the most reliable - for instance the sentence in the lede which is backed by Witkowski, Lum, Corballis, Stollznow, and Drenth. Perhaps there has been some mistake? It would be better to discuss instead of editwarring, especially if there has been any confusion over what a reliable source is. (Hint: A magazine article which doesn't even mention NLP does not count as a reliable source).
I would also point out that good-faith attempts by other users to restore sourced content are not vandalism. Calling other editors [vandals does not help your cause.