I did NOT attack you personally.  I did NOT violate any policy.  That is a figment of your imagination.  I attacked the country of France.  Now, back to the article.  You keep telling me to focus on the article but neither you,  or  have explained why the rumour, which is the subject of this tread, should be on the Rumsfeld Wikipedia page.  As far as I can tell I have asked both of you for your input on that topic at least two times each and I haven't got a respond to that topic yet. I have received is a lecture from  explaining his personal opinion that I should refer to Kerry is a Loser and from  about logical fallacy of my argument.  But I haven't heard one comment from either one of you on the actual topic of discussion which is the rumour listed about about Rumsfeld.  I will repeat.  Remember you really shouldn't lecture someone about sticking to the facts at hand unless you yourself actually comment on the facts at hand, which you haven't done yet.  Unless there is some evidence provided for the Rumsfeld rumour then it will NOT go into the article and if anyone puts it in the article then I will rip it out.- 17:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)