Point of view terms used in the Scott article 

In the modern reaction it is said: 

"Scott's reputation survived the period after World War II, beyond the 50th anniversary of his death."

This is rather obvious Point-of-view-terminology. Saying something has survived only until a certain point in time basically means it's dead. Captain Scott's reputation is far from dead, so this is not a true representation of reality.

A correct encyclopedic term would be:

"Scott's high reputation remained uncontested until the period after World War II, beyond the 50th anniversary of his death."

Another problem is that it is spoken of a timeframe beyond World War II, but the first book that is mentioned offering criticism in the next sentence is from 1966. Here we have a difference of more than 20 years that are claimed to belong to the time that Scott's high reputation had been contested, while in reality they belong to the uncontested period. Consequently, this is another passage that needs further rectifying clarfification.