"==Cool name.==
 03:43, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'll second that!  BTW, thanks for the good edit on programming errors.

 About those subheadings... 

Regarding the change on Political spectrum. It says [] that  tags can be used to keep items out of the table of contents. You're right here that they should be in the table; I had been used to using them alot for repetitive elements on another project. But I thought I would mention it. 

 Scientology 

Good job on that NPOV rephrasing of the Helena Krobin section of Scientology.  (Talk) 

 Sockpuppet 

Hi there! You said the sockpuppet proposal could be reworded... please tell us how you'd like to reword it, thanks. adiant_* 11:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

 Wikipedia:Sock puppet/Proposal 

Hi there! I've reworded this a bit per everyone's comment, and would like to get support to make this a guideline and allow it to be used. Could you please indicate if you agree? If you want a rewording, please be bold. Thanks, adiant_* 12:30, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

 Woods Hole 

Thanks for taking care of that.  I couldn't get to it when I noticed it today.  Good work.   04:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chlorophobia
I found sources that it is a phobia however the info inside I could not source.  It would be a better vfd candidate. I don't have time to list it now however. Sorry  30 June 2005 20:54 (UTC)

Christianity
You are funny, I see that. I wish it didn't have to be at the expense of others, *me* in this case.  9 July 2005 06:15 (UTC)

Unusual spellings are funny. It's not meant personally.  9 July 2005 06:34 (UTC)

 It's not really that unusual.  

 Template locations 

I have noticed you discussed template locations at Wikipedia talk:template messages.

One user has unilaterally been moving templates from articles to talk pages en-masse (over 100 articles are affected during a spate made by the user last night). I have spent some time trying to resolve this issue.

There is now a poll discussing where templates belong created at Wikipedia:Template locations, and a discussion at Template talk:Expansion.  

Wikipedia:Template locations
Hi, you voted for the AID-template to be on the talk page. Is there a specific reason why you discriminate against this project as compared to the almost identical COTW?  
If you would like to insist on the AID-template having specific different rules than the others, please tell us on the Wikipedia talk:Template locations. 

 Spyware.png 

regarding your reversion of our edit to the the ""spyware"" page...

Sorry if we didn't follow protocol. Is one expected to actually edit the graphic and/or correct the caption?

May I trust that you are editing the graphic to correct the information?

Thanks.

I edited the caption, yes.  

I appreciate you editing the caption. I see that it now says ""Spyware and other toolbars"". I work on a team that is working on the Desktop.com toolbar that is included in the graphic. Would you not agree that the inclusion of our toolbar in the image that is displayed on the ""Spyware"" page impliesat the very leastthat our toolbar is Spyware? Our toolbar does nothing without the express permission of the user as spelled out in the EULA. We don't want an image of it included in an image meant to illustrate Spyware. Does that make sense? Thanks for your consideration. Respectfully, 

I understand your concern, and I agree that we should be careful not to imply that all of these toolbars are spyware. I can imagine that it's a particularly pointed issue in your case since the Desktop.com toolbar is at the top of the image.

I can't speak to the specifics of your product  after all, Gator and WhenU also claim that their prog