Scott is a baseball player, not a Fox News contributor 

Therefore, shouldn't his article be treated as such? Yes, it says a lot about how pathetic and forgettable his baseball career is and will be that he is known more about his birther comments than about his accomplishments as an athlete. However, the inclusion of his birther comments in the article leads one to wonder: if he hadn't made the comments in the first place, would there even be a Wikipedia article about him? I hope the answer is yes, because it means that the focus of the article will be what it should be.