::::A gap of a few days until that happens wouldn't be terrible but would in my view be unnecessary.  The established media hardly covers websites like this at all, as a Google news search will reveal.  Requiring a report in traditional media will therefore impede our ability to create a useful article unnecessarily.  The requirement to cite a reliable source is usually imposed so that erroneous information will not be included in Wikipedia articles; this is not the case here as the facts are not in dispute.  The article already includes links to two archives if you like you can think of the fork as an achieve only faster, easier to use, and with search functions intact.  The reliable source policy should not be used capriciously when unnecessary.  How for instance would you justify the archives under the reliable source policy in such a way as not to include the fork?