::Let me see if I tracked all that: 
 ::*Sort in chronological order, but keep them separated by series (like they are now, more or less). 
 ::*I don't know what you mean by "that information is not available unless it is the default". If you mean what series they belong to, that's what the "saga" column is for, so you can sort by it. 
 ::*I tried to include just essential information (one-line entries), but what displays depends on people's browser resolution, not something we can control. "Medium width" is a rather ambiguous term. 
 ::*The "saga", "series" and "trilogy" verbiage was from the original list. I didn't add it; I don't care if it goes. 
 ::*I don't think publisher really matters and it could get problematic if there are several publishers for one book (like paperback vs. hardback vs. Kindle). 
 ::*I added the ISBN column because of the {{ISBN}} tag at the top of the article that some other editor added. Apparently it's important to someone, but I don't care one way or another. 
 ::*Illustrator identified in notes is fine with me, for those books that have them. 
 ::*Your next point you ask for prose. I didn't remove any; I included any prose that existed. But realize that adding prose may lead to overflow, which you said you wanted to avoid. 
 ::*If you like, you can restore the  links to articles on series. I removed them because I was planning on converting the lists to one big list eventually, wherein we couldn't have them. 
 ::*Card writes books for many different audiences. I agree would should come up with a way to consistently label them, but this may prove difficult given that many of his books are suitable for multiple audiences. For example, Ender's Game is appropriate for young teens and adults alike. 

 ::Did I reiterate all your desires correctly? 

 ::I still lean towards the single list for the reasons given by  first response above, but let's see if we can reconcile all our desires. —  |