You're saying Steyn linked to an article that accused him of "raw racism" in the most prominent place on his site as a joke? That seems to me implausible; even you say it only "may" be the case. I think your tone is, sadly, clearly abusive. I don't think anybody could interpret attacking a sincerely meant entry as an "overly long, wandering, and ridiculously padded treatise astroturfing your friend Hari's works" as anything other than abuse, I'm afraid. Please try to engage with my arguments politely. 

 As I say above: A wiki user posting above makes the point, which I think is reasonable, that at the moment the 'crticisms' section consists solely of the conclusions critics make about him without the reasoning behind them. Therefore it sounds like a string of insults. I was trying to rectify that by giving both a criticism and the reasoning behind it. Since Hari's review is described by Steyn himself as "the long-awaited liberal takedown" of his book, it seems a reasonable criticism to do this with. If the wording wasn't great, by all means improve it - but removing the criticism all together is not reasonable, nor I'm afraid is your consistently insulting tone. 

 Please respond to this point without abuse.