Once again, this is very helpful information and I thank you so very much, Meteor sandwich yum. It's all kind of confusing in its own way. "Internet references are fine as long as they are reliable sources." Yet, "An "external link", when used here, means a non-reference link outside of Wikipedia..."! Don't get me wrong... you have have provided me with some great reference sources, which I will research and use if appropriate, and I thank you. It is a matter of distinguishing between what is acceptable and not acceptable as an "external link" that befuddles me. None of my 'external sources' are attempting to sell or advertise a product, just verify that the product exists. With regard to the 'Discography', I will go ahead and dig into the validation of each release to come up with a reference for each and every one of them. But, they will be 'external links' because they are the only 'sources of proof' that the product exists! This is a genuine article and the subject is still living. It is the 21st century and alot of data is not available in 'written' form. Most information comes from 'Internet Sources' these days. The facts are gathered (Discography) from the actual products themselves, indicated by the Record company, Catalog number, and Release date. I shall endeavor to provide verifiable links to all of the postings contained in the Discography as requested and required, but then the article will become inundated with 'external references', which is evidently, frowned upon by the review board! Trying to wrap my head around this. Don't you hate having to deal with novices? )