, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 
 ::::I support  's suggestions above. If it's not in the article, it should be.    
 ::::With regard to NPOV and the scientific consensus, as I have said many times before and provided RS, GMO critics dispute the "scientific consensus".  And it's not in your proposed FAQ.  Almost everything proposed in the FAQ is Pro-GMO.  That is not NPOV.  Have you all even *read* anything from GMO critics?  Or do you just immediately dismiss their claims because you believe anyone who criticizes GMO's are WP:Fringe, stupid and unscientific, including the scientists at ENSSR or Union of Concerned Scientists?   18:30