== What a sham == 

 I just read most of Conservapedias pages. About 5000 to be exact. 

 What a shameful website! Not only does it ban users who show liberal points of view, or points of view that do not agree with neo-con doctrine, but it also rejects some CONSERVATIVE points of view. Its basically an encyclopedia written only from Christian points of view, and Christianity is given a defacto statement of being true, while other religions are treated as suspect. 

 Also, on its page on Wikipedia, it states that Wikipedia founders once owned a pornsite. Hmmm, the purpose of that was... what? Most likely to show bias against Wikipedia. "oooh looky here, they owned a pornsite, they must obviously be bad people!" 

 Wikipedia will have articles that show up as biased, because anyone can edit them. There is no preference to who is right or wrong. all meet, discuss, and eventually settle. If this website shows, therefor, a long leaning liberal bias, and has a lack of leading words and statements, then it must be because the people are liberally biased. 

 Signed By Scryer_360, who is still to lazy to sign in to sign his posts right. 

 :It's censorship. People aren't blind, they'll take everything they see on there with a pinch of salt. Especially the bit about how kangaroo's descended from one pair off of Noah's Ark... I did, in fact, expel a chuckle when I read that... Man, I hate conservatism.   

 They discovered range blocking and have now blocked over 500,000 users.