== Let's all run away and block our ears like we did when we were kids! == 

 How nice. you've protected Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia on the faulty intelligence pretext that the individual allegedly responsible for the less favourable revision is a "banned user". Face it, you don't know that banned user, you don't know the person who collated the details and reported them, you don't even know me. You don't see through the wires and you don't have any hard evidence of anything. And yet you block your ears, "nah nah, I can't hear you!" to the facts. How about reading the information inserted and investigating WHY three times an "experienced editor" receives serious ARBMAC warning in the short space of seven weeks, and not only is he still editing never to have received a topic ban or even a short block, but hasn't changed his edit-warring nor his stance on a topic for which is has been certified as having violated NPOV. And out of three warnings, not ONE is on display? Why were they not added? Why were they removed? Do they have some sort of "expiry" time? Why don't they apply to editors named and shamed as far back as 2010? You're part of a protection scam here. It's thanks to people like you Wikipedia is a failure.