::::::A quick look at the history of the naming dispute page shows that such examples, and examples of usage in the Irish parliament that excludes Ireland have been there for a long time.  It's still entirely beside the point of "many" or "may". If you are not offended but others are offended then an example of your use is no proof of anything about others.  Similarly, my point about the description "nationalists" being incorrectly used to argue that only a small number find the term offensive is still valid.  You can't present "nationalists" as being a minority in a country where the main political party describes itself as Republican, whether or not you can find occasional use by members of that party. To do so would be a logical nonsense, apart from being OR. Meantime "many" is well supported by reference.  There seems to be lots of IDONTLIKE it about that fact, much as there is lots of IDONTLIKEIT about the fact that the term is in common international use.