The recent changes are crossing the line by putting in blatant POV and unscientific conjecture. Do I really need to take this up at the Fringe noticeboard? There is no scientific evidence proving that they had feathers. There are no peer-reviewed sources that accept the conjecture that they "probably" had feathers. There are a few books with illustrations that are sold as popular media. That is it. WP:V is very clear that we can only include facts. WP:FRINGE is clear that scientific articles need to have the rigor of peer-reviewed and direct evidence to back up the claims. Dinosaur articles are not special privileged. There is no exception. Right now, the page can be removed as a Featured Article because it is violating these guidelines. Please keep this in mind. The fact that people can say "Nobody is claiming that there are hard proof evidence" and still persist in trying to place it within the article shows that there is a lack of following the guidelines. Please, just follow the guidelines.