I am suggesting that the following paragraph be removed: 

 "Historian Philip Jenkins explored how hot topics such as the Franklin allegations, whether or not they are worthy of attention or credible on their own merits, are seized by political opportunists for their own purposes. He also described how cases such as the Franklin allegations can acquire credibility, even if they lack any credibility inherently, when reported in various media in a credulous voice.[1] Numerous conspiracy theories evolved and persist, claiming that the alleged abuse was part of a widespread series of crimes including devil worship, cannibalism, drug trafficking, CIA arms dealing and links with the first Bush Administration." 

 Is Philip Jenkins' personal and general opinion about conspiracy theories really important or relevant enough to be added to the Franklin child abuse allegations? Should we add Jenkin's input on every single wikipedia article concerning conspiracies or devil worship?   

 This paragraph does not add any relevant information to the article,  it is merely the expression of an author's opinion.  Therefore I am suggesting it be removed.  Let's hear some good reasons for it to remain.