Please clean up "false etymology" language  
 It looks like the text has reverted to using the phrase "false etymology" - can someone please fix this?  It's tacked on to the end of the paragraph in an unsupported, and very distracting, way.   I agree with Asnacclasnac, its hard to believe that this could ever be definitively disproven, and its annoying.  At the very least, there needs to be an explanation given of how/when this theory of etymology was disproven, (with a citation of course) and the section should be labelled as a "disproven theory" early on, not labelled at the end as "false" which isn't at all neutral or appropriate.  Thanks!    Kate