" 

 Alas, there's hardly time to do more than jump to conclusions. You do seem to have re-created this template after it was deleted via TfD process  perhaps with different content. Nevertheless, I don't feel it's appropriate in template space. I don't know if I should justify my opinion at length; let's just say I think it's an interesting idea, but not ready for prime time yet; and I feel that especially short template names and those made of special characters should be subject to intense scrutiny.  

 I am really quite hostile to TfD process; I feel it's unfavorably biased toward deletion. Thus I refrain from nominating templates there  why feed the monster? Instead, I try to improve questionable templates and talk directly to their creators. I don't like bullying or bossing; constructive criticism is better.  

 I suggest that while you develop this concept, you move it either to your user space or perhaps to a name such as Template:Fnhover (footnote hover). Perhaps when it's better proven, you might seek the more desireable template name. Meanwhile, you'll sidestep the all-too-likely drag of a TfD nomination. — 熊* 04:49, 2005 August 16 (UTC)"