== Your early pulling of RfA == 

 I saw your early pulling of my RfA, and I do not pretend that I would have an easy time dealing with this situation if I were in your position. 

 Normally, I follow concensus, and please note that I am a user in good standing, maybe not as "experienced" as some, but in good standing: Look at my block logs: 

 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page;=User:GordonWattsDotCom (old) 
 * and 
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page;=User:GordonWatts (new) 

 However, concensus must give way to policy: Either the "concensus" must be opposed on policy grounds, or the "policy" must be changed (if it is really wrong). 

 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff;=23267488&oldid;=23267441#RfA_Policy:_Approx_3-17-3_concensus_says_your_policy_is_stupid.3F 

 Since the policy, as applied, allows any user in good standing to be admin, I have notified Jimbo of the lack of compliance with policy: Mob Rule is fun -but it rarely ever works. 

 The "ill will" factor, while not significant in my honest opinion, has not diminished by the pulling of my nomination; I would ask that you repost my nomination and let it run its course giving me about 2-3 extra days to make up for what you've done in the early pulling, but, if you want to wait and talk to Jimbo first, that is alright. 

 PS: Please read the RfA page from beginning to end before you suppose to do anything: You will find that the situation is not what you think, and I suggest your reading it so that when Jimbo asks you about it, there won't be any surprises. 

 Best.