== Sexuality in BLPs == 

 I'm just wondering, by your standards, when would a BLP subject's sexuality EVER be noteworthy?  What would it take to convince you that it was?  Since it appears to be important to you, I am not a one-issue editor, although I am very much a casual editor.  I find your views on the notability of human sexuality to be unsupportable in literature or in the number of BLPs that DO include references to the subject's sexuality and/or relationship history.