This should be a no-brainer.  
 We do not use Mormon preachers to provide a summary of the Book of Daniel.  
 There may be a section about "In the Latter Day Saint movement" which may or may not be within WP:DUE, but we certainly do not confuse Mormon literature with Old Testament philology.  
 If you do check the lead of  Book of Daniel, you will note that there is still a nod to religionist views ("many evangelical commentators still defend a sixth century date") even though this has nothing to do with scholarship on the text itself. By the same standards, this article can conceivably give room to Prabhupada's views. But basing this article on a view that takes the Kurukshetra war as historical would be as bizarre as basing the Book of Daniel article on views that take Daniel to be a historical character.