:Wikipedia doesn't follow blogs. The internet is full of considerable volumes of total nonsense. There's no reason for this article to follow it, just because the volume of nonsense has reached a certain level. In fact, Wikipedia policy precludes us from following it. It's pretty obvious there's a widespread internet-based misunderstanding of the status of "di Pietro" (of similar silliness to Dan Brown thinking "da Vinci" was a name for Leonardo). If and when a reliable source makes this point, it might be coverable here, but not before.