:I found the Islam article to be a very good, factual article that helped me understand the religion. Please consider that Wikipedia is one of the only places where you can go to see a one page summary on topics like that.  We need to be respectful of all the religion articles on Wikipedia because they help eliminate people's ignorance.  The media does not do that, blogs do not do that, it is unique to Wikipedia to require the articles to present a subject fairly while also including all criticisms. I don't think we should be so upset about having mention of the sex abuse scandal in the lead, especially if it give some perspective on the issue like percentages which I have never heard the media report - my religious education students (the children of Catholics!) thought that 30-40% of our priests were pedophiles!  If there is some piece of information that is needed in the lead it is something to educate people to eliminate that misconception.  Burying mention of the sex abuse scandal in the body of the article without mentioning in the lead will not only make the article an ineffective tool of information, but will make it appear to be a POV and will never pass FA.  FA is important if you want people to trust that the information they are reading is reliable.