::::::::Interviewer - 'The case against the rebels is generally poor' - Sellstrom 'I fully agree' - so any re-word should not imply he is only critical of the Syrian governments theories - 'the case against the rebels is 'generally poor' -  Sellstrom 'I fully agree' -  he then mentions how poor the Syrian governments theories are specifically. What are erlbeko and philthyhenry saying anyhow - which theories do they suppose Sellstrom thinks are not poor, that wish to say the rebels are responsible? He mentions none. are darouet, erlebeko, philthyhenry  implying sellstrom thinks that there are strong theories that indicate rebel responsibility for Ghouta? The suggestion is ludicrous and indicates how much bad faith and pov twisting the darouet/erlbeko'philthyhenry idiots are involved in ' THE CASE IS GENERALLY POOR AGAINST THE REBELS - SELLSTROM  I FULLY AGREE - o.k. - you fucking fascist idiots. you pov pushing cynics.