"== WP:FAR == 

 Just thought I would inform you that I re-added Islam because the point of the review is to discuss the repeated protection of the article due to disputes which means that we are reviewing the instability of the article.  Please keep Islam on the list until the review is complete   
 :Why did you repeatedly close this because of the protection as it was the original cause of the FAR. I have started a discussion but I cannot move it back due to the bot archiving.   

  
 Joelr31, I edited the Puerto Rico page and added the gallery to the Administrative divisions. Compared to State articles which many of them contain a table gallery of their important cities, Puerto Rico's is extremely dry and and pretty much only text. I would still like to add a similar feature to the article whether it be in administrative, geography or what have you, but get back to me so that we can collaborate before anymore of my editing gets simply just removed, because it takes time to search picture's correct names and place them into the table.    

 The previous post was done by me before i logged in    

 == Wikipedia:Featured article review/A Tale of a Tub == 

 Thanks for the initial note, but people are still inappropriately voting ""keep"" ...    . 
 *I have laid out my specific points about WP:OR violations within the article in detail, and yet only one user , specifically responded to any of these points.  Respectfully, I defer to your judgment and that of  for the rest of the FAR proceedings.  My points were already made in detail at the top of the FAR - the rest seems to be, unfortunately, just a generalized debate over things that should instead be discussed at the talk pages of either WP:OR, WP:RS, or WP:V.    . 
 *Can you please help at Wikipedia:Featured article review/A Tale of a Tub?  There are one or two editors so far that have actually responded to the specific points that I raised - but other comments are attempting to divert the discussion from WP:OR in the article itself - to an ad hominem overgeneralization and outright negation of all of my comments as a whole!    . 

 == Music == 

 Thanks Joel. I begged a few people to comment on that one and got nothing. It was bothering me. Once the reviews get passed two months, something must be done with them.    

 ==Triton== 

 {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" 
 |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" |  
 |rowspan=""2"" | 
 |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 
 |- 
 |style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" | Thank you! I've been trying to get those last few pesky citations for ages! Now I can start thinking about getting the article promoted. You're a prince. -) pod  
 |} 

 :Ah ha! I knew you were a spy. A vicarious thank you from me on Serendip's behalf. Passing along a paper really is a random act of kindness that can be especially helpful.    

 == Blackface == 

 Hey Joel. Next time you log-in and look at FAR, I'd argue against closing Blackface, even if you see removes as the most recent comments. I'm trying to be fair, because I know there's editors working. There's also been some dispute, so I'd like that to work itself out, even if it takes time. Cheers,   21:09, 11 February