" 
 ::: and I have already had this discussion on my talk page – he doesn't seem to have been aware that Profs. Baxter and Sagart have indicated that BS 1.00 is fully developed and ready for academic citation.  However, he is correct in pointing out that because it won't be formally published until later this year the academic community hasn't had time to review and appraise it.  I personally would support updating to BS 1.00 or Prof. Zhengzhang's reconstructions, but I understand Kanguole's hesitation to do so as also wise.  White Whirlwind  "