I'm not vandalizing your talk page. I'm just trying to set things right.    

 No, you're just trying to push things in the wrong direction and vandalize.    

 You added the word FAG in place of the show titles on the article. Or rather "faag"     

 That's the real name of the show. What else would a show with those characters be called?    

 No, they're not the actual titles. Did you even watch any of the shows?    

 For example, not "GayPants". "Squarepants".    

 GayPants is its name, NOT "'Square'pants," the character has gay pants, not square. They are actually a rectangular prism if you want to get technical. Simple as that.    

 As I've said, before. DID YOU EVEN WATCH ANY OF THE SHOWS?    

 NO, you didn't say it before, and yes I have watched them before. Have you?    

 Yes, I have. The recent ones do suck. But, they don't go by the titles you put down. Also, if by chance I am a vandal, then by that logic, so is , right?    

 And how can pants be "gay? That doesn't make sense. Unless they were rainbow, but they're not. -   

 Pants can be gay by having a gay look to them, like how homosexuals buy certain clothing and have a certain style. It makes perfect sense if you think about it. Also they don't have to be rainbow to be gay either.    

 As a final question, what do you know about FACTS and OPINIONS?    

 I know that shows that are of low quality like the new Nickelodeon shows cannot ever be popular. That's the FACTS. I also know that people are pushing (and protecting) THEIR OPINION about the new Nickelodeon shows being "popular" on that page.    

 They don't look gay to me. Just shut up.    

 Maybe not to you. So just shut up yourself already. okay?    

 All right, the conversation is officially OVER now.    

 Why are you even on my talk page anyways??    

 Because I'm an idiot, and you keep baiting me.    

 I thought this conversation was already "over." =P