" 
 *I think it qualified as patent nonsense ""Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.""  However, since you disputed the deletion, I have undeleted and re-listed it for VfD.  I think ""that this whole shalopy was a load of dingo's kidneys derived by a mistake.""  -)   |   

 ==Esata== 
 Seriously, why can't I add another artificial language to the list? Why are the other on the list worth staying and Esata is not? What are the criteria? Or is this a personal policy against me? 
 *I wasn't involved with the VfD, but it seems the consensus was that this conlang is too new to be encyclopedic. In other words, it doesn't have a sufficient number of users to be notable. Once it gains popularity, you could make a case for re-instating the article. In the near future, however, the VfD consensus has to prevail.  |   
 ** That's sad... It really feels like a slap on my face for no reason. 
 ***I'm sorry.  I know.  No one meant anything personal against you.  The votes were honest evaluations by people about whether the topic was notable enough for inclusion in an encylcopedia.  The concept of notability is often fuzzy (an obscure Dutch painter may have an article, but a newly-released book by a previously unpublished author may not), but it is that concept that ensures Wikipedia is not overrun by advertisements and articles about people's pets.  I'm sure no one meant anything personal by it.  Umm..  I hate to have to mention this after your last comment, but it needs to be said.  Wikipedia doesn't allow articles that consist of nothing but external links.  You can contest deletion of an article at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion, but I have to warn you that any article deleted according to policy is highly unlikely to be re-instated.  WP:VfU is mainly to contest the legitimacy of a deletion process (i.e. didn't follow policy), not to contest the result of a debate.   |   

 Why can't I find ""Esata"" on the deletion list so I can contest it's delition legitimity? . 6:46 GMT 
 *If you are asking how to find the deletion log, you can view it here.   |   

 ==Note to self== 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 ==Thank You For Your Support== 

 I would like to thank all of the Wikipedians who supported and/or contributed to the article Military history of Puerto Rico.  Because of Wikipedians like yourself, this article was able to make featured article status.  It was my goal to celebrate my first year in Wikipedia with a featured article and you all made it possible.  Thank you once again  

 ==Friendly Chat== 

 I just thought that I would let you know that  has nominated me for adminship.  I would like to invite you to participate at WP:RFA if you wish to do so.  Thank you and take care  

  
 ==Thank You== 

 What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator.  Thank you for your support.  I feel honored to have befriended you.   

 == Quoty McQuote-Quote == 

 I'm just really sarcastic when it comes to the junk that appears on VfD. 

 The ""killed with a very large axe"" bit is actually one of 's bits from the mailing lists. He was going off on people who use ""delete - non-notable"", but finished off by noting that most things on VfD still need to be removed in the manner prescribed. Now that I look at the actual message, he said ""big"", not ""large"".  |  

 :I have the torrent piped to my Gmail account, so there's a big tank to hold the flood, and it's relatively easy to skim a whole thread. Not to say that it isn't fairly repetitive. Troll complaining about being blocked...whether to include schools...troll complaining about being blocked...""notability"" as a reason for deletion...troll complaining about being blocked...  |  
 :*LOL!  Yep, that proves it.  You're on the list.   |   

 == RFC ==NEW