==An advice, or even assistance, for a gross problem in the Greek Wikipedia== 

 I apologize in advance for taking your time to talk to you about a grave issue that has arisen with the Greek Wikipedia -  I would not have done so do, if things had not deteriorated to an unacceptable extent there. Actually  -  advised me to consult you for our problem. Thus I am turning to you as our last resort. 

 There is a considerable number of users of the small community of the Greek Wikipedia who would like to report the administrators' team for abuse of their authority - which has resulted the reduction of contributions to the Wikipedia, as statistics reveal. 
 
 To give a recent example, a user was banned for three months because he used the expression "fundamentalists babblers" in a talk page, which the administrators thought to be a personal attack, while, on the contrary, a few days ago an administrator called the way of editing by some users, including the one banned, as poustrilikia, which means "to behave like a faggot/catamite", a swearword that is strongly offensive in Greek. Personally, I do not find the behavior of this particular administrator as sad as the fact that no other administrator reacted to this incident - on the contrary they covered him. Personal attacks and threats have repeatedly taken place on the part of administrators. Some days ago one other administrator said in a talk page that if someone has criticised the administrators that they are authoritarian, he may be banned, and this has happened in some cases. I believe the last statement is the epitome of the situation.  

 If you decide to act on this and subsequently need more details on the events, more incidents, or the testimony of other users, they are available. 

 I want to make clear that I do not ask your assistance so that you may "ban" the administrators in some way. I strongly believe that some of them, even some of the offensive ones, have much to offer to Wikipedia, but I also strongly believe that they are neither as discreet nor as neutral as they are supposed to be because they feel, for a number of reasons, that nothing can stop them in what they do in our small community. 

 I think that if we could hold elections for administrators every year in our small Wikipedia community, this would motivate all the administrators to be more productive and more attentive in their behaviour to the other users, so that they may be elected again over the years, and this is my proposal as a possible solution of the ongoing sad situation. 

 I would really appreciate your advise and help in our problem, and I say "our" because I know that what I write here is endorsed by others too. 

 Sincerely yours,