In my opinion,  this posting (copied below) by you proves that you're against points of view other than your own, which is contrary to what wikipedia stands for.  Just because you don't view something as a controversy does not mean it's not controversial.  Please re-read wikipedia's neutral point of view documentation regarding balance  here.  

 :Given their long history, there is no way a single ad campaign (or a single ad in it) gone unnoticed by all but a small contingent of white supremacists and other miscellaneous right wingers looking for their "controversy" du jour could rise to the level of notability that would merit its inclusion in the page. Given that absolut-ly no one cares outside of the Malkin set, a rather fringe political demographic to be sure, I'd have to second the motion to protect the page until the "issue" is forgotten (i.e. next week). The rabbit in the suitcase (talk)  

 While you are certainly free to have an opinion, you are not free to suppress other's opinions here on wikipedia.  With as much hate as you seem to have in your heart for differing viewpoints, I don't expect you to learn to accept other's views, but please at least learn to tolerate the existance of other points of view. 

 It's the only way to achieve balance.