::::IMO, Subwayjack is a disruptive user who can't help himself when it comes to his favorite topic (Charles Whitman), despite his protestations of having reformed (repeated numerous times now all with equally disastrous results).  He has no interest in editing anything else.  He was given a long leash for weeks as Woohookitty and I tried to help him understand Wikipedia's policies on NOR and NPOV, but he didn't care to hear them.  He has inserted enormous amounts of original research then edit warred, blanked pages and attacked other users in his attempt to retain the information (even going so far as to accuse two editors who tried to thwart his original research of being sockpuppets (disproven by checkuser), writing one user an email suggesting that he and I engage in bestiality (charming), and threatening to "ZOMG report us to the media!". He has selfishly attempted to promote the sales of a CD of interviews regarding Whitman that he created by inserting a link from the Whitman article to an eBay sale of this CD, then edit warring with me in an attempt to retain it.  When I removed the link, that's when he called me a cunt and was blocked for it.   

 ::::I didn't mind giving Subwayjack another chance even after that and I myself unblocked him, but within hours of being unblocked he began being disruptive again (when his edits again fell afoul of NOR and NPOV and other editors removed them or criticized them, he started blanking user pages and even blanking large swaths of the Whitman article).  He was indef blocked at this point as hopelessly disruptive.  He's simply not cut out for collaboration here, he creates a poisonous atmosphere around this article and at this point I don't consider him much more than a vandal, though it pains me to say that.  It's a shame that he can't respect other contributors or Wikipedia's policies, but he's proven more than once or twice that's the case.  He has sent me many rude, crass emails which I now mostly ignore because they're full of long rants about his original research and foul things about other contributors and myself.  Could other users have been more civil at times?  Sure.  But nothing any of them did or said rose to the level of attacking and disruption that Subwayjack has engaged in.  I'm done handholding, reverting, pleading, cajoling, quoting policies until I'm blue in the face and just plain listening to him, quite frankly; other contributors shouldn't have to put up with it either.  If you'd like to unblock him and then deal with the aftereffects, be my guest.  But I'm done with it.  · /