I found no such reference to YouTube not being a source of reliable information. I seached with CTRL-F for youtube on the page you cite and its discussion page. Either you made an erroneous statement, or you made something up. You also overlook the fact I am merely pointing to the video being stored on YouTube. There are countless places to store video online. I am not citing YouTube as an actual source, you are only trying to paint it that way. I respect you removing the article, but keeping the discussion open. I notice on your user page you are listed as a Christian, so was the other user Timneu22 who cited it as an attack page. I hope there is not bias at work here. 

 Also in the section where I cite the two videos (which happen to be stored at YouTube) I point to a video by Mr. Anderson and also a video of Mr.Noble uploaded by his church. My article is reporting and it is being treated as a polemic. You are making a straw-man argument by stating I am 
 citing unverifiable sources. How is stating that a person has preached someting critical of the subject of this article and a video recording of such is available here(at such and such localtion) citing an unverifiable source? Your postition is fantastic and illogical. Also when you say that neither of our opinions matter on this matter you bring up something that has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. 
 I am not upholding my opinion, nor denigrating yours. I am addressing your arbitrary determination that I used an unverifiable source. When you say this argument is moot you are evading the issue. You made an illogical determination that you cannot substantiate. 

 With all due respect sir, if you are going to quell debate on an issue, then you should not interject your view on the issue.