# Support.  A majority of recent RS have made the shift, so we should do so as well.  (Proper respect to the team which assembled the evidence for this RM.) While BLP may guide a decision here, it in no way mandates the change, and it should not have been invoked to lock in the original move.  That action turned August's RM into a referendum on enforcing the R in WP:BRD. Many editors here suggest that it should be policy that WP titles its biographical articles based solely on the subject's legal name, while others advocate that the subject's preferred name always be used.  Both suggestions are short sighted.  Manning's choice of Chelsea Elizabeth appears neither whimsical nor mocking, and I am glad to see the media respecting her choice.  If she had instead announced a preference for, and possibly obtained a statutory, legal name change to IDidNothingWrong ImInnocent PleasePardonMeMrPresident Manning, the media would, at best, mention this as a footnote in their articles, and we would not find a consensus here on WP to support such a title change.  But what if she had chosen Liberty Innocent Manning?  That is a reasonable name, but would still be viewed by many as mocking her conviction.  Would we automatically choose such a name for this article's title?  Fortunately, we do not need to make such arbitrary decisions ourselves because we rely on outside sources.  We should always follow our sources and never lead them.