== "Intellectual Dishonesty" == 

 The statements by the Roman Catholic church affirming evolution both by John Paul II and Pius XII are conspicuously left out as is the reference from where it comes from.  Teilhard's "teachings" as you call it, are well supported.  To weigh two statements against each other and claim that the 1962 monitum is somehow more important and then back up the statement without a proper reference is intellectually dishonest.  As I have said above, the July 1981 statement is very conspicuous for its brevity compared to Cardinal Cassoroli's (John Paul II's secretary) carefully worded statement.  However, I think the way the statements have been reworded appears to be somewhat fair.  And I would prefer to leave at that.   

 Furthermore, again you have chosen to not specify what everyone knows about Teilhard's work and that is that it is only his scientific works that are considered suspect.  That fact shows that the accusation of intellectual dishonesty is a mere projection on your part.  Teilhard remains an important thinker and if you are going to quote a Vatican document quote it from the source.  You choose to use the term Holy Office when referencing the 1962 monitum statement that was merely published in l'Osservatore Romano.  Those who have studied Church documents in Roman Catholic seminaries know that there are degrees of importance from the different levels of Church documents.