" 
 ::*Newsletter delivery by   

 == Reverts == 

 I have noticed you customarily revert unsourced edits. Why not apply judgement and put a  {{Citation needed}}  template whenever possible? I refer you to Wikipedia:Verifiability. 
 thankyou, (and keep on the good work)    
 :I disagree with this sentiment. The onus is the one inserting the content to provide an adequate source. Mr. Wales even said content that is not sourced should be removed with prejudice. You are doing a fine job Sesu. '[']  
 ::Mr. Wales? and Sesu, why have you retored on Artichoker's page and not here?  

 ::Anyways, I wasn't critisizing that particular revert but the custom of reverting by default. It is according to Wiki's guideliness on such instances (non defamatory, non POV) to be cordial, note that a source is missing and then allow enough time to source. Peace.    
 :::He was referring to Jimbo Wales, founder and all-around head honcho of Wikipedia. And I didn't respond here because I never do; I always respond on others' talk pages. 
 :::I revert a lot of vandalism, test edits, POV, unsourced statements, and the like. It's not my responsibility to hold the hand of every new user who adds uncited material to articles. I almost always place a notice the talk page of users that I revert the edits of to clarify exactly why their edit was removed. These notices have key words wikilinked that will help the user find out exactly how to make more appropriate edits in the future. And besides, the edit of yours that I reverted was to a BLP, which have much stricter policies than other articles. -  
 ::::As to ""It's not my responsibility to hold the hand of every new user who adds uncited material to articles"", I fail to see the relevance.  

 ::::I have reread the appropriate parts of BLP (I advice you to do the same), and I quote ""Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion"" and ""Remove any unsourced material to which a good faith editor objects"". I haven't reviewed your reverts, but by way of example to the Miyamoto one - was the content contentious? libelious? non factual? did you find the edit objectionable? (probably not) then why revert? for lack of sources? then request one or leave it be.    
 :::::Look, when someone adds unsourced information to an article, I revert it. -  

 ==Greetings== 
 I just wanted to say ""hi"", and to thank you for doing such great work on the Metroid: Other M article, so keep up the good work and have a nice day. I also feel like pointing out that you have great taste in games.    

 == GI == 

 So you have Game Informer? For how long?   
 :I do not remember the issue, but it was about the worst-dressed video game characters. I read it months ago and was disappointed to not be able to find it online. I can only remember it being after mid-2003, but before 2008. Sorry.   
 ::I tried to narrow down the issues for you, but its possible it is outside of that range. However, it should be sometime after F-Zero GX's release. Regards,   
 :::A scan please, with the appropriate parameters filled out from Template:Citation#Citing journals, newspapers, magazines, or other periodicals. Thanks for your effort!   
 ::::Find someway to get it online, that's usually the easiest way. Like if you hav