- bullshit. It is not "discredited". You just don't like it. Quit making shit up. The Hoepfner source is not "more reliable". It's just a different source. How is Hoepfner not more reliable? Not only does he have access to the order of battle of the Prussian forces at the fortress, but also knows exactly what units took part in the action. Loison does not know the strength of Prussian units and at best is an estimate by his commanders present. 
 - it is published in a peer reviewed journal. Quit making shit up. then let's see a review of the article then. 
 - already provided. Quit making shit up.  Kroczynski never says it, and he never gives any proof to back up the claims of Loison, nor does he state anything about the veracity of such claims. 
 no, we actually know who Korczynski was (a historian who was the head of a National Museum in Kolobrzeg). According to the source, he was not the head of a museum at all. According to a google search, he was actually a highschool teacher in Kolberg, not a museum director. Not as reliable of a source as an actual historian like Hoepfner. 
 bad faithed trolling? banned user? please, I have never been banned and I am sticking to the contentiousness of the article, not attacking users like you have done repeatedly.