== As I feared..!!! == 

 This article is now - wait for it - 103.22 KB!!! Whereas the actual/real/true article on the Apollo program is just a mere 79.85 KB. This has to stop because this article is nothing more than a repository for bullshit, BS that has no real merit except for the piquing the interest of a vocal minority. There are now hi-def images of the moon showing the moon buggy tracks and even the shadow cast by the flags planted on the surface. This is article in many way represents the Achilles' heel of Wikipedia, the concept that something is only "notable" based on footfall (i.e. people making a noise about it) irrespective of whether what is being promulgated is complete bollocks. For instance, a professional astronomical researcher cannot create an article about their peer-reviewed work on the Moon Landings because it would infringe WP:OR, WP:ONESOURCE and WP:SELFPUBLISH, however any retard who has a book published making unverifiable accusations and unsubstantiated claims can be placed here as a shrine to stupidity. Even now this entire talkpage is being taken over by people who are utterly clueless about "real science" but know everything about agendas i.e. the Moon Landings are fake. It is all very ironic because it just proves another point by religion vs science. A believer would say there is a god but a sceptic would demand physical proof. Yet in the moon landings case there is plenty of physical evidence but sceptics say that is not good enough and instead believe in their "god"!!  

 Come on this article should be trimmed according to WP:SOAP because it is just a platform for people who don't get out much because of character disorders and paranoia. Saying that this article must include all claims is just plain dumb. That is like saying that everyone who wanted to be a major league player but missed the cut should have an article of their own. Everything on this page never happened, it is fantasy. There is far too much independent evidence, sources and material to prove this. Besides...Armstrong did all this in the Cold War, only eight years after the Bay of Pigs. Do you think the Soviets or the Chinese missed the opportunity to score a massive propaganda victory if they did not already have independent telemetry tracking the Apollo mission to the moon and back again (derrrr they had sophisticated tracking for all kinds of missiles)!? 

 Please will someone just stop this nonsense...Wikipedia is supposed to have a policy called WP:DENY that states vandalism should be ignored and no attempts should be made to empower those conducting such acts. Well what about articles then? This page is an endorsement of bullshit!! Profoundly, ridiculous, unadulterated twaddle is this not giving the people who believe such rubbish a place to peddle their "wares". That does not mean it should be ignored completely, noting that bullshit exists is enlightenment in itself, but to actually engage in the deception is a  fallacy. These conspiracists claim they are refuting acknowledged facts but they never actually refute anything. I sincerely want to see this article cut to 25% of its current size because then it is stating quite clearly that the topics covered in this article are nothing more than bull and are bring treated as such. (Thought experiment: would the Wikipedia project continue to be taken seriously if the article on alchemy (turning lead into gold) was double in size to the article on the Higgs boson? Personally I don't think so.)