ok, i admit it: i edited a post that had already been vandalized(unnoticed and uncorrected) and quoted my friend's comical response to the original vandal. For this, i recieved a correction from accurizer, and when i checked the original post, both the original vandal and my response were removed. knowing that accurizer checks previous 'vandals'(like me now, i suppose) history for new possible vandalisms, should i take this to mean that if i find other articles to be vandalized, that my parodies of the vandal will result in original vandals' work being removed? Personally I find the actual vandalization to be a problematic, if not comical, and inevitable result of the wiki. to quote my original friend, "wikipedia is like that dictionary in the public library that everyone writes their thoughts in."  this is the same friend that suggests we put fake encyclopedias in the library just to confuse everyone... maybe i should stop listening to my friend. 
 good job accurizer, for correcting that other guy, but not me. ) 
 =D everyone should get a good laugh in, at least once day.