==Edit warring is not an option== 
 It seems you ignored my warning above, and continued with your pointless edit war. So you got blocked. This was intended to make you realise that only measured adult discussion can resolve disputes at Wikipedia, but from your resumption of the edit warring today, it seems it hasn't.  I'm going to make a final effort to persuade you.  You see, Wikipedia runs, fundamentally, on consensus.  That's decent, well-meaning people discussing their disagreements and coming to a mature conclusion.  We have, literally, thousands of disputes going on every day, and the overwhelming majority of them are solved amicably and to the benefit of the disputed articles.  Thoughtful discussion on article talk pages is the only way such disputes get settled.  Now it seems the changes you want to make to the Juno (film) article don't enjoy consensus; you've been reverted by a large range of people.  The correct, indeed the only, thing to do is to use your intellect to persuade other editors of the wisdom of your position.  Unfortunately you've chosen to return to simply repeating the changes, again and again and again. And rather than state your case, you've just resorted to threats, saying "I am going to change it back to the term "fornication", if somesone is going to block me, most of my classmates said they will change it back to the proper term."  Sorry, that's just petulant bullying, and we're not going to put up with that. You need to decide now whether to behave decently, to engage in a civilised discussion, or whether to war and bully. The latter path is one of ignorance and failure; you'll just be reverted and blocked and you'll vanish, unwelcome and unmissed, like a fart in a railway carriage.   |