:Jack I've continued reading about this too and encountered some interesting stuff I never knew before. 
 :There's an argument to be made that the FBI's conclusion that the bag was made from paper and tape from the TSBD was just wrong. That opens things up a bit. And if you're willing to go a little further, there were three or four bags in the mix! (1) Oswald's bag, (2) the bag made from TSBD paper and tape, (both 1 and 2 may have been found in the TSBD?), (3) the "replica" bag made by the FBI to show to witnesses and (4) the mysterious "dead letter" bag that Oswald may have mailed to himself.. 
 :James DiEugenio, a researcher who firmly believes in a Claw Shaw/Ferrie/Oswald conspiracy argues persuasively that ALL of Frazier and Randle's statements are a load of junk. So you've got me on that one. 
 :Most interesting to me, did you know that Officer Baker significantly changed his signed statements? We may have been arguing the finer points of a bunch of made up stuff for years. Baker's original statement said nothing about the second floor lunchroom, confronting Oswald as gunpoint, etc. His 11/22 signed statement said only that he'd encountered a man about 5'9', 30 years old, 165 lbs, wearing a brown jacket on the third or fourth floor, then continued upstairs. Still sort of a match for Oswald, but what the hell, officer Baker?