:::As for the Staatscourant link: I actually added the Staatscourant site as a reference (since it was used as a source for information about the municipal council, the mayor, and up to date population statistics). I probably indeed should have used a direct page to the page about Bloemendaal. As for the railway information: actually I have quite strong objections against the general mode of representation, which is not . An (in my eyes) good mode of representation, would be for example a subsection 'Railway connections' containing the text: 

 :::'The municipality of Bloemendaal contains three train stations: Bloemendaal, on the connection from Haarlem to Uitgeest; Overveen, on the connection from Haarlem to Zandvoort aan Zee; and Heemstede-Aerdenhout, on the connection from Haarlem to Leiden.' 

 :::The fact that the railway information appears below a navigation bar (which should IMO be below the complete article), as well as the fact that it contains information that is unlikely to be of interest to . I agree that it's good to incorporate this information in the article, but for that I'd say the information really has to be incorporated into the article itself, rather than be added below the actual article and the navigation bar. One thing which I aimed towards with my edits of municipality pages, is to avoid redundancy, add extra and more accurate information (population density, mayors, information about municipality councils) and at the same time provide a consistent mode of presentation. So, when a good and clear way of presenting train stations has been found, it would be best to apply on all the municipality articles.