May 2011 (UTC) 
 : Having been accused of rudeness before, I will merely note that there never has been an article called Still Life of Vincent van Gogh (Holland) and ask you to explain why you quoted that title above. It did occur to me that (Holland) was there for a purpose. Choosing a title is fraught with problems: what is the plural of "still life" - neither "still lives" nor "still lifes" seems right; is it "of" or "by"; do we disambiguate with "(Paris)", ", Paris" or go for still life works created by Vincent van Gogh in Paris? Having the title as a singular seems very ugly to me but  has endorsed it so I will accept still life by Vincent van Gogh (Holland). But I would like to ask modernist why paintings of Amsterdam by Vincent van Gogh is allowed as a plural! — RHaworth  09:15, 21