Under Political Views is a paragraph that states: 

 "USA Today reported in December 2006 that Hashimi was involved in forming a multi-sectarian alliance to replace the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, with the encouragement of U.S. President George W. Bush and Muqtada al-Sadr.[4]" 

 The footnoted article makes no reference to replacing al-Maliki. The point of the alliance was to counter the political power of al-Sadr, which certainly wouldn't be "encouraged by al-Sadr" It even specifially states that Hashimi's support would allow Maliki to remain in power. 

 Al-Maliki has been reluctant to break politically with al-Sadr, whose party controls 30 of the 275 seats in parliament. Support from al-Hashimi, whose bloc has 44 seats, could allow al-Maliki to stay in power without relying on al-Sadr. USA Today 

  
 I would suggest the paragraph be edited to something like the following: 

 "USA Today reported in December 2006 that Hashimi was involved in forming a multi-sectarian alliance, with the encouragement of U.S. President George W. Bush, to counter the political influence of Muqtada al-Sadr.[4]" 

 This would completely change the meaning of the paragraph, so in the interest of peace & harmony, it would make sense for the edit to be made by someone who is more invested in the article.