:My esteem for Jim Shapiro has absolutely nothing to with it, just as his book has absolutely nothing to do with Palladis Tamia. The SAQ is a fringe theory. While it is perfectly acceptable to discuss whatever implications PT may have on the SAQ in an article about the SAQ in its various permutations, it violates WP:ONEWAY to bring it gratuitously into an article about it. 
 :You also might want to read the WP:BRD page and the WP:BRDWRONG page.  
 :My mention of the Geneva Bible was in way of analogy. It's not all about you, but next time I reach for a comparison I will not mention any of your work.