:: Wikipedians should try to read Wikipedia's policy regarding Neutral point of viewhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Article_naming 

 :: Right now there is no way we can call this a neutral article. For more information please read: 
 ::*Neutrality disputes and handling 
 ::**Neutrality and verifiability 

 :: I will quote the first paragraph from Neutrality and Verifiability "A common type of dispute occurs when an editor asserts that a fact is both verifiable and cited, and should therefore be included."  

 :: Here is another quote from the same place: 

 ::"Verifiability is only one content criterion. Neutral point of view is a core policy of Wikipedia, mandatory, non-negotiable, and to be followed in all articles."  and another interesting point that is mentioned there, "Concerns related to undue weight, non-neutral fact selection and wording, and advancing a personal view, are not addressed even slightly by asserting that the matter is verifiable and cited."(  )