:::::::::::::* Spare me your "primary contributor" fanfare. See who is the second person with the most edits in this article? Save your self-promotion for someone who is impressed by it. Thanks. Do you know how of your edits are reverts? About two thirds. Yes, I counted them. Know why I stopped editing this article? Guess you do. 
 :::::::::::::* Persistent contribution is stewardship. Reverting because you liked it better before is ownership. I know the difference. 
 :::::::::::::* What makes you think you have any more interest than I do in the quality of the article? 
 :::::::::::::* Unless the "core of editors who worked to build the article" is just yourself, I'm part of it, so again, point is moot. 
 :::::::::::::And about the "You have no idea about which you speak", I brush it off just like one more of your gratuitous bigoted personal attacks, which are an integral part of every single conflictive discussion you take part in. BTW, "about which" what? Your syntax makes me cringe.