== RfC: Should evaluative statements indicating where in the source novel certain scenes from the television series episode be sourced primarily to the book, or to secondary sources that make the comparison? == 

  
 #Do statements like, 'This scene/character shown in the episode is not in the novel at all' with the novel itself as a source?" require a primary source or secondary source? 
 #Do statements like, 'Jaime gave Brienne the sword in chapter X of the novel' in an article about an episode of a television show in which that same event took place with the novel itself as a source?" require a primary source or secondary source? 
 #Do statements like, 'Content from this episode can also be found in chapters X, Y, and Z of the novel' with the novel itself as a source?" require a primary source or secondary source?  
 Two editors feel that WP:PRIMARY allows them to source the connections between the novel(s) and the series' episode(s). Two other editors feel that sourcing these connections to a reliable, secondary source is more appropriate, given the complicated nature of these connections. All four are entrenched in their positions, equally convinced they are interpreting correctly policy and guidelines. An effort at DRN just concluded without resolution in the matter. -