:This is obviously going to have POV problems, perhaps they need to see if they can get some "anti-Masonic" editors.  The claim and fact dialog in the last section is particularly blatant.  I also found some time ago, when looking at the pre twentieth century history that a lot of it had been cut and pasted from http://www.masonicinfo.com/ .  Nothing wrong with that, but the text did need to be cleaned up. 
 :I personally am a bit dubious with putting anti-freemasonry as one homogenous movement, as sites such as masonic info do.  After all the Catholic prohibition on freemasonry may influence Evangelical doubts - but it is hardly the same.  Similarly totalitarian dislike of all autonomous groups (especially secret ones) is not really tied in with theological objections to naturalistic religions.  The anti-establishment critique of masonic influence may be made by some Catholics or Communists, but it is also made by a lot of people who are neither Catholics or Communists for reasons to do with neither theology nor a fear of potential opposition groups.  
 :This is not an attack on the editors here, it's just an observation that if a page like this is for historical reasons mainly maintained by people with one point of view then it will tend to get biased quite correctly.