::Before I could get myself to change any photos the text distressed me. On the face of it everything is fine, but see the features of quality articles listed in the WikiProjects Arthropod such as Krill or Spider. Gave me an inferiority complex! This article stands out like a misshapen potato. We got to make it much, much better.  
 ::* It does not read either for a beginner or for a informed user. 
 ::* The sequencing did not seem logical, so I have made an initial change. 
 ::* Lots of interesting facts about butterflies such as aposematism, mimicry etc do not find place. 
 ::* Butterfly anatomy is ignored (see Krill for a concise diagram and description). 
 ::* 'Wing development in larva' and some taxonomic issues are over detailed compared to the rest of the article. They need to be moved out once appropriate articles on these emerges. 
 ::* Not enough, interesting, good enough, well chosen photos. 
 ::* A very American flavour, needs neutral point and global point of view. 

 ::Considering that Butterflies is a much more traditional, popular and fertile field than Krill, it distresses me that we are nowhere near good enough. This is a clarion call to battle. All you aurelians out there lets pitch in and make this worthy of being called a feature article. FlaME ME IF YOU LIKE BUT BUNG IN STUFF, IDEAS, PHOTOS, TEXTS. Let this page shine forth!