")?    
 ::::One disputed edit, made once, can be annoying, but isn't necessarily disruptive. Making the same disputed edit many, many times is rude, obnoxious, irritating, etc., and is disruptive in part because it's so much harder to revert 50 edits than just the one in the first case.  
 ::::Bots need to get approval in advance for the work they do, to avoid the very same situation you keep finding yourself in: multiple editors highly irritated with you after a large number of edits have been made. —    
 :::::Are you highly irritated with me? If so why? I am following the guidelines... For these edits I've provided clear edit summaries to show which guidelines I'm following. I'm fully aware of the process of applying for bot approval not that that's relevant... My point was, there's nothing wrong with making edits in droves as long as they follow the guidelines. I'm not being disruptive, I'm not a vandal. You're saying I shouldn't make any edits in case I upset other editors?! If I'm doing anything wrong (by wrong I mean anything which isn't in line with the policies and guidelines, not just personal preference), then tell me and I'll stop and revert my edits.    
 ::::::WP:NC-TV#Season articles says ""For an article that describes one season of a television show (possibly with an episode guide for that season), the article should be named first by the name of the show, and then by the season number, such as ""24 (season 1)"""". The presence of ""possibly with an episode guide for that season"" makes it abundantly clear that this guideline is aimed at articles that provide more detail than a simple list of episodes such as NCIS (season 1). That list, along with many others like it, don't describe the season, they are just an episode guide for that season. An example of an article that the guideline applies to is 24 (season 1). It both describes the season and contains an episode guide. It would be inappropriate to name that article List of 24 episodes (season 1) because WP:NC-TV#Season articles says that type of article should be named [[ (season )]]. However, WP:NC-TV does not specify a name format for articles that are just episode guides so using WP:NC-TV to justify some of the renaming that you've done is inappropriate, such as when you moved List of Hawaii Five-O episodes (season 3). It's your (mis)interpretation of the guideline (note that it's only a guideline and not a policy!) that is at issue here. You have clearly irritated numerous editors with these moves, there has been no consensus to stop using ""List of"" articles and the guideline doesn't support the moves you've made so yes, with all of this taken into account, making these moves is being disruptive. It's clear these moves are disputed so you need to be seeking consensus on the talk pages for the moves before carrying them out.    

 Changing tactics from doing contested moves yourself to requesting the as undontriversial at Wikipedia:Requested moves goes above and beyond disruptive. Right now I suggest to stop moving these types of articles and/or requesting them be moved. If you caontinue to game the system. you will be blocked from editing. -    
 :Changing tactics?! I did that before moving the others. And the only reason I listed them at WP:RM was because I could not do the move myself. I'm not ""gaming the system"". Please get your facts right before accusing me.    
 ::Based on the time stamps there, here, and in your hitory that seems to be bunk. It also shows you are unwilling to stop when concerns are raised. -    
 :::OK, sorry if I wasn't clear. It was at the same time as the group of moves it was in the middle of theme - it was after some and before some others. It's not as though I ""changed tactic"" or am playing a ""game"".