::::: Lewan urgently needs to stop shilling for these clowns. His response to anything would be a primary source, we should avoid primary sources here and go only with secondary sources that describe the exchange. When we start saying things like "A criticised B's coverage of C (source: A criticising B) and B responded (source: B's response), we are headed to a bad place. This is an article on a minor bit of pseudoscience that is already prone to being bloated with trivial mentions.  ()