:::::I have previously stated that these would be much more defensible if there were, in fact, a particular citation for each one included that somebody, somewhere, has called a particular analyst's six-month punt a "Friedman unit" or variation thereon. But including any and all such predictions is synthesis. It's not our job to say what predictions are or are not Friedmans; it's our job to document secondary sources making that judgement. I'm sorry, but your paragraph above amounts to tautology.  |