* Following his marriage to Elizabeth Bland around 1725 
 :: Is the exact date unknown? 
 ::: The references state that it was around 1725, so I left the caveat attached to the date. Let me know if this will work.     
 * Beverley established his residence at an estate known as Blandfield should be combined with Beverley named the estate after the family of his wife 
 :: I've combined the two sentences. Let me know if this fix works.     
 * Beverley named the estate after the family of his wife.[3][12][15][16] 
 :: Again, there is no need or advantage to including four cites for this statement. 
 ::: Done! I've limited it to three.     
 * There are an awful lot of uses of Beverley when pronouns would do the job; e.g., According to Beverley's 1756 will, Beverley possessed landholdings in Essex 

 ===Marriage and family=== 
 * Beverley married around 1725 to Elizabeth Bland (born May 26, 1706) 
 :: Again, is the date unknown? Also, the syntax suggests he married "around 1725", when I mean to say he married Bland around that year. 
 * Beverley and his wife Elizabeth 
 :: There is no need to mention he by name her, as she's just been introduced. 
 * This section also lacks flow, and reads as a rather jarring list of trivial facts about who his kids married. Try to transition the prose with an overarching narrative in mind. 
 ===Later life and death=== 
 * This also reads as a rather disconnected collection of facts about how his will was dispersed, but there is no explanation of Beverley's cause of death. 

 ===Conclusion=== 
 I will readily admit that this is my first GA review, so if you think I am wrong I encourage you to seek another opinion, but as of now I am heavily leaning towards failing the GAN, primarily for the fact that the article lacks an overarching narrative and is instead a loosely organized collection of factoids that do not really tell the reader anything about the person that was William Beverley.