A few comments on the situation: 

 *I oppose the deletion of the sourced content (though not an ideal source, it'll do). 

 *I support these small changes by Ddweller. 

 *It may be worth noting that 1) accurately relating historical accounts is not one of the Book of Mormon's self-stated purposes on the title page, and 2) the title page also includes the disclaimer that "if there are faults [in this book,] they are the mistakes of men". 

 *The section uses a bulleted list. While I am, in fact, using a bulleted list right now, in this instance I think prose would be better. 

 *The list of anachronistic animals could probably be put in a footnote instead of the article's main text. 

 *FARMS and FAIR are mentioned, but their specific rebuttals are not. Perhaps notable rebuttals should be included? 

 Depending on how Real Life (tm) treats me, I may or may not come back and try to make some edits based on these comments, assuming consensus emerges around them. ...comments? ~''''