== A few thoughts == 

 I sort of think there needs to be some kind of resolution to the fighting over this article. This log is beyond absurd: and, more to the point, when I've seen similar protection logs the dispute(s) has/have usually ended up going to ArbCom. That's not something I imagine anyone wants. Arbitrators have limited patience too. 

 As far as further disputes go, I really can't imagine what there is left to fight over. From the point of view of someone (more or less) on the outside, who's never seen the film, and, in all honesty, doesn't give two flying fucks about it either - this article is not that bad. Ok, so not FA-standard, nor A-class, or whatever, but Wikipedia has far worse trash for you to go out there and fix. Ok, so that "academic reception" stuff is, at least in my opinion, a bit too long, though the film  obviously does have some notable critics (Mr Dawkins). But, hey, it's a New Age film - when we write an encyclopaedia article on such a topic, we should probably use a slightly different language-game than we would in an article on mainstream science. And, be realistic - there is no need to explicitly keep on hammering out the fact the science in the film is tosh. Most people will click on those links to the Ramtha School and JZ Knight articles. Those who don't, you won't persuade anyway. . 

 In conclusion: this article is not a perfect model of NPOV. Big deal - not. Wikipedia has far worse articles. This one is, by and large, ok. Maybe at some future stage we can come back and trim a little bit of the criticism, which is, at least in my opinion, excessive. But the unwavering obsession some people appear to have with this article is totally unwarranted. It's reasonably fair, both to fans of the film and to those who hate it. Is there any need to keep on with the quarrels and edit-wars? I warn you - if you do keep going, and this does go to arbitration, I suspect the arbitrators' reactions will be far from pleasant, particularly since some of the names of the chaps fighting here have come up in previous cases. 

 With all respect.