== NPOV == 

 I'm adding a POV tag to the article.  The recent edits do not seem to follow wikipedia policy.  Specifically there seems to be some original research in the "Objections to the common knowledge argument" section, I quote from the recent changes  
 :Believers of Bible scientific foreknowledge believe it is fair to ask the questions, "Did the Jews borrow the good practices of the Egyptians but borrow none of the bad? If so, why?" 

 That's given without any supporting evidence, and seems like the writer is simply making a statement of his own belief. 

 Also: 

 :supporters of Bible scientific forknowledge believe that in order to evaluate the issue of Bible scientific foreknowledge one must employ the principle of examining the total evidence and not exclude any evidence when deciding this issue. 

 Who said this?  Again it seems like the writer's own statement.  Original research? 

 It seems like the whole article is creepingly filling up with this kind of thing, and will require a great degree of pruning or re-writing to make it meet acceptable standards.