==Advice== 
 Hi. These discussions are easier to follow if they are in chronological order, so I have moved your two comments down. If you want to contest the deletion of your article the first thing to do is to ask one of the admins who deleted it, by leaving a message on their talk page - you can see who they are by clicking on the red-linked article title. But first, you should read this advice: 

 Repeating what I wrote under Copyright release" above: it is not enough to assert that you have permission to use the material, for two reasons: 
 *to publish material in Wikipedia involves much more than just permission to reproduce. As it says at the bottom of every edit screen: "You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the  CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL" which implies permission to anyone to re-copy, edit, and use for any purpose. It is important that the copyright holder understands this. More information at WP:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations. 
 *while I do not doubt that you are who you say, Wikipedia has no way to be sure of that: you are just someone on the end of an internet connection. Copyright issues can give us severe problems, so if you want to submit copyright material you must follow the steps explained in the notice above headed "Copyright problems with Rosina Bierbaum". 

 Two more important points: 
 *Wikipedia is not a sort of notice-board on which you can simply pin extracts from your web-site: it is an encyclopedia, with its own standards for articles. One important way in which it differs from a notice-board or forum is that an article is not owned by its author, or by any editor - see WP:Ownership of articles. Another warning on every edit screen is "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." You must expect that your contribution will be edited, and you will not be able to control it. 
 *Also, since you work for Dr Bierbaum's school, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a conflict of interest in writing about her. That does not bar your contribution, but it means that it is likely to get more scrutiny than if you were an impartial editor. There is advice on editing with a conflict of interest at WP:BESTCOI and at . 

 After all that, my advice: if you don't want to write from scratch, follow the steps above to organise a copyright release. Trim the text of peacock terms like "prestigious" - from memory, it was not too bad in that respect. Add enough independent references to establish that Dr Bierbaum is notable to the standard described in Notability (academics); I don't think that should be a problem. Trim down to essentials rather than include too much detail. Do not list every paper that she has ever written - for that sort of detail you should link to her website. Look at some of the articles listed in Wikipedia:Good articles#Educators for models, though you do not need initially to be as richly-referenced as they are.  Disclose on the article's talk page that you have a COI in that you work for Dr Bierbaum's school. If you like, prepare a draft in a user sub-page - click on the red-link , type in the box and save it. 

 I'm afraid you probably approached Wikipedia thinking that your task was no more than to pin on a notice-board an extract from your website, and are by now dismayed to find that it is more complicated than that. The reason is that Wikipedia only remains a useful encyclopedia, rather than a sort of glorified Myspace, by having standards and trying to enforce them. If you have any questions, ask them below - I will watch this talk page. Regards,