:The Hürriyet article doesn't really seem to me to speak to the question of what the TRNC government (as opposed to academics and businessmen) may think about Turkish troops in Northern Cyprus.  At the same time, if the lead is going to say that the presence of Turkish forces is "supported and approved by the TRNC government", I would feel better if that claim were backed up by one or more reliable sources (right now there are no sources given) — and, if possible, sources reporting comments by non-involved third parties who might be trusted to deal evenhandedly with the question of whether the TRNC government's acceptance of Turkish forces accurately reflects Turkish Cypriot opinion. 

 :I do think that the lead should retain some (suitably sourced) mention of whatever support exists for the Turkish military in Northern Cyprus, as a counterbalance to the other comments in the last sentence telling the reader about opposition to the Turkish military presence by the RoC and the UN.  But again, it really should be sourced. 

 :As for what the Hürriyet article says about Greek Cypriot views of the Turkish army presence in the north, these comments seem almost surreal or unreal in the context of the overall crisis, and I'm not inclined to accept this part of the article as a reliable source for Greek Cypriot opinion in general — or am I missing something really major here? 

 :Additionally, this last sentence of the lead — if it's to remain in the article at all — would seem to me to make more logical sense if it were put at the end of the third paragraph (which deals more directly with the invasion / intervention / whatever-we-wish-to-call-it and its aftermath as reflected in the facts on the ground).  —