The original article that I devoted substantial time to correcting and improving and the article as you have now restored it does not come close to saying that the McNulty are the royalty of Ulidia, it cleearly misleads the reader into believing this, without the further explanation and citation, which I provided. You may want to go to Black's Law Dictionary and look up the definition of word "fraud". Is it better to lie to Wikipedia readers or provide them to much information? Since it does not appear that you, yourself, are willing to invest the time and work needed to make this original Wikipedia article on the McNulty surname more historically acurrate, truthful and comprehensive for the Wikipedia reader, you might have simply provided me the constructive critisism that my extensive revisions might be overwhelming for the less scholarly adept readers and that the article needed to be broken down into several smaller and more cohesive articles, rather, than your being offensive and sirly. This type of tact and the skills needed to properly correspond in polite society are, however, skills that are bred into persons over decades, so I am probably just wasting my time here. Anyway, I will take care of this work myself over time. In closing, your inability to recognize that Clonoulty is is anglicized from Irish language terms meaning the fifth of Ireland or Ulster, that is that portion of Ireland that was legendarily granted to the royal forbears of the Donlevy demonstates that you have little grasp of the subject matter that you are attempting to edit or critisize. As this is also explained earlier in the article, your continued ignorance of this fact also demonstrates that you made no real attempt to comprehensively examine this article before precipitously acting to remove it. If you limit your critisism of others work to the structure of their exposition, you shall embarras yourself less in future. Finally, where Alexander McLachly is placed in the article is not pertinent. Persons attempting to research him by entering his name into the Wikipedia site, would be lead to the article and while the information on him is not sourced, the short biographical detail for him might aid their further research by providing direction. Also, your innuendo that my article citations are specious is also unjustified and offensive; however, as you do not understand misleading statements are lies and fraud, I douby that you shall either grasp the subtleties of an innuendo or how offensive you are being to people when you communicate with them.