:This is stupid. There are probably a billion guidelines that argue against this very thing, regardless of how irrelevant that may be. That these sources chose to make up a title calls their reputability into question. It also gives rise to suspicion of people like Sergecross for suggesting there is any value in pure errors, outside of being accurate. 
 :At best, this information needs to be in a small section clearly outlining its status as an error (which then needs to be done to as many articles as possible), or as a footnote. It's better to just not mention the info at all, because they're non-existent titles entirely.