, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 

 :::::::OK, apologies for the outburst (removed my comment), I misread what you wrote. Let me make some points. Firstly, I am not in the position to make major changes to this article since I have limited access to the internet and sources. So all I can really help with is prose and presentation. Second, when I say concise, I mean the reader be given information which is necessary, and spared of any superflous or unnecessary details. For example, consider in the legacy section some editor though it would be a good idea to list the names of 10 heads of state who visited Ataturk in his life time, this info has no bearing on his legacy. The rest of that section deals with monuments named after him. Now when I say concise I mean getting rid of all this superficial info and replacing it with content of relavance and depth e.g. how has his secular reforms affected Turkey, what impact have his ideas had on the rest of the Muslim world, or how did his independence struggle inspire other movements under colonialism. What are his implications for womens right etc etc. All this info can be summarised in less than what is currently written, but it would be of infinite more value. This is what I mean when I write the article should be "coherent, concise and informative" and should be applied to all sections of the article.   15:46