, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 
 :::::::And you have proof of what you said or is that more of your OR? Baryshnikov may be right about that the idea are represented in Finnish historiography however that does not mean that non-Finnish historian who uses primarily non-Finnish sources would automatically be 'follower of Finnish historiography' (that part is OR) - even when he would comes up with same conclusion as the Finns does not mean that. So far it has been trivial to prove that Baryshnikov's ideas are in minority since there are several opposing authors so i fail to see your point. -   06:04