" 

 ==WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter== 
 The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing!   •   

 == Infobox reviews == 

 I have to ask, where does it say no reviews in infoboxes? I can't find it in MOS.   

 : Has been so for long time, see Template:infobox album#Professional reviews.    
 ::OK, but that's nowhere in WP:MUSIC or WP:MOS. What kind of consensus was reached on this, since so many albums contain reviews as standard?   
 ::: I'm just guessing here, but I think consensus was reached at WT:ALBUM. The fact that it was not removed from so many infoboxes is for the reason I stated in the section below - that if an editor removed it, they should add a critical reception section instead which is too much work. I totally don't accept this user removing sourced reviews and doing nothing about it. I believe sourced material should not be removed because of MOS.    
 ::::OK that's fine. And, although apologies to Bovineboy for having this extended conversation on his talk page without his presence, there doesn't seem to be widespread awareness of this. As well, mass removals of the reviews with only a perfunctory ""no reviews in infoboxes"" with no further explanation or discussion is pretty bad form.   

 :Hey everyone. I'm going to go back through and add reception sections for those articles with reviews. I just found it easier to do it this way. Sorry for the confusion.   
 :: Very well, having that in the edit summary would have avoided the confusion. I actually think moving reviews from the infobox to reception sections is a good idea and I'm happy someone is going to do it - so well done ) Best regards.    

 == reviews in infoboxes == 

 If you remove a review from the infobox, please put it in the article itself. Other editors work hard to find those reviews, you can't just remove them on grounds of formatting.    

 :Hi Bovineboy2008. 
 :When you are moving the reviews you are sometimes causing ""Cite Errors"" to be created. ie Dances with Wolves (soundtrack) and  Jonathan Livingston Seagull (album) (See Category:Pages with missing references list).  
 :* This is because that page has no References section ie. {{Reflist}} or . Please add these if a cite error occurs. The pages need a ""References"" section anyway! 
 :* I suggest that you preview the pages before saving, and look right at the bottom of the page for any  text. 
 :Regards,    

 == Film titles and disambiguations == 

 I noticed that you recently moved a couple of documentaries to their proper disambiguations such as (film)/(YEAR film). There are more, what do you think about moving them as well? I could make a run at it if it's appreciated.   

 :It would be appreciated. I generally move ones that I come across as it isn't that pressing of a matter. Mostly, when I go through the