== References and citing sources, more copyvio == 

 I've reverted your recent edits there. 
 A couple of reasons. 

 One is that those were not references, they were material that should have been in the article with references. You need to read WP:CITE. I use Wikipedia:RefToolbar. 

 Sources must discuss the subject. You can't use  for the article on the party as it doesn't mention the party. Neither does smartervoter, etc.  

 Copyright violations - you really need to be careful about this. "On June 25, Massachusetts voters will elect a U.S. Senator to fill John Kerry’s term. The ballot will include three candidates, the Democratic nominee, the Republican nominee, and the nominee of the Twelve Visions Party. He is Richard Heos. Here is a story about his campaign." is copied from the source, and makes no sense in any case as appears to refer to the coming June 25th. And we wouldn't write "here is a story".  

 "Below is the page link for the Twelve Visions Party with the Federal Elections Commission; however this page link shows no recent posts related to the Twelve Visions Party." In other words, it doesn't belong in the article because it doesn't talk about the subject. 

 The article needs more commentary from independent sources. I've removed your image because primary sources are already predominant, and that simply overwhelmed the article. Our articles are meant to be built upon what reliable sources say about a subject, not about what the subject says about itself. There's a learning curve in Wikipedia and sometimes it's steep.