. By the way, the whole point is that it doesn't take much research to falsify some of the ridiculous statements that tend to show up (unsourced) in this article. How exactly would a person who points out obvious errors in this article be skewing reality? The person above points out the impossibility of an urban area of 20 or so thousand people hosting the greater part of 90 thousand immigrants. Please explain how thats any kind of extremism or political agenda. And while you're at it, explain how comments like "I'm the king and queen lawyer of england and everyone else is stupid and has to be censored" adds anything to any discussion