:I can't see how any of these would be meaningful here - I object to all of them. 
 :The First Reference 
 :1 - Actually, it's been shown that people fear what they aren't familiar with. PCs are great, Nuclear is feared in most places.  I can't see how t would be useful anyway. 
 :2 - Pre-TMI, that was true.  Post-TMI is a different culture. 
 :3 - Odd, I used nuclear fuel software named PANACEA. Seriously, safety isn't simple or easy.  The electricity is the same, and capacity factors are now above 90% so it is reliable. 
 :4 - The nuclear industry has an information network whereby incidents at any plant are broadcast to every other plant with the intent that the same problem not occur twice. 
 :5 - Each American has the option to vote for strongly anti-nuclear candidates.   
 :6 - True, but choice-based is available now. 
 :- 
 :Second Reference 
 :We already say "likely would be less" 
 :- 
 :Third Reference 
 :The sarcophageus only covers the ruined Unit-4.  The other units remain without containment buildings. 
 :Containment never sealed off at TMI. 
 :- 
 :Fourth Reference 
 :This reflects the current state of training and operations.  Tech specs carry the force of federal law.  And the Station Shift Supervisor can throw anyone off-site. 
 : 3 July 2005 18:58 (UTC)