::Mr. Jayjg,  
 ::1- There were not multiple editors there were two editors, Which one of them have done lots of edits without source and have done edits with false sources. So there were just one editor. And if you see the talk page you will understand that actually there were multiply editors that do support my edits. PLEASE! PLEASE! GO READ THE HISTORY, you are an old admin you should not behave like this. 
 ::2- I do revert the deletion of well sourced materials. and also use the talk page before doing the revert. but the other user didn't use the talk page till an admin did froze the page. so I have a question here, reverting the deletion of sourced materials and having 3RR with a user that do not use the talk page is that wrong? 
 ::3- "how good you feel your edits were, or what other editors did", by good edits I mean the well sourced edits and by what other editors edits, I did mean the wrong and false sourcing claims. You should read and check the history before giving alert to me. 
 ::4- "you were edit-warring with multiple editors" about who you are talking. so show me who are the multiple editors you are talking about? there where two editors one was patriot1010 and the other was NPguy...  and the patriot1010 was the one who added lots of claims with false sources to article and the NPguy was the guy who delete all the well sourced edits without using talk page. So here you are doing supporting these two guys. Jayjg Check the history carefully, 
 ::