==History Section 2== 

 I can understand that the section would have quotes from Crawley, who is a source that's not very good in terms of anthropology... 

 However, the sections in which the article DOES NOT quote needs to be changed. If there is no direct quote then it shouldn't be used. Plus, personally, I think Crawley is not NPOV and should be shown as such. The point made earlier about "well he's historical" isn't being balanced in this article by newer studies since he's being given undue weight in the article. 

 It's OK to say that the Ancient Greeks thought that the world was flat, until, say X scholar (which is true). But lookit was *until* X scholar and it's not unrelated to the article. The idea of "primitive" human beings based on socio-economic status is unrelated to this article and should go into anthropology philosophy. 

 Beyond that, it's fine to cite him. But to choose him specifically for saying those statements makes it POV until you can get a more modern source. And please do not paraphrase him without making it NPOV.