:GA review (see here for criteria) 

 #It is reasonably well written. 
 #:a (prose):  b (MoS):  
 #::  
 #It is factually accurate and verifiable. 
 #:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  
 #::  
 #It is broad in its coverage. 
 #:a (major aspects):  b (focused):  
 #::  
 #It follows the neutral point of view policy. 
 #:Fair representation without bias:  
 #::  
 #It is stable. 
 #:No edit wars etc.:  
 #::  
 #It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. 
 #:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
 #::  
 #Overall:  
 #:Pass/Fail:  
 #::  
 Specific concerns 
 * I'm assuming no pictures are available, correct? 
 * Source for the last parts of the third paragraph of "service career"? 
 * What makes http://uboat.net/wwi/ a reliable source? 
 * Your retrieved on dates for the web sources are borked. I tried fixing them but they looked worse after my fix... so if you could fix them so they show the day and month as well as the year? 
 : I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.   -