" 
 ::I am sorry, Wolfman97, you are attacking a totally legitimate link and try to defend it with a reason which is besides the point of your initial statement.  You are right, there are many references that could be added to this page, but there is nothing wrong with this particular link.  As I sayd, references should support the statement, and don't have to be true (this is NOT the medium to discuss the correctness of the external data, send an email to the webmaster of the server that is hosting the external link, or the author of the article).  I have nothing to do with deletions of your links, you can add them, provided you follow established manual of style and policies and guidelines on the Wikipedia.  Nobody keeping you from adding peer reviewed references to statements that needs them.  So if you think certain things should have a reference, just add a , add them yourself, or, if you are not sure if the reference is covering the data, or there are other reasons why you should not add a link (to name a few reasons: per WP:SPAM or WP:No original research), add a subject to the bottom of the appropriate talk page with reference and reason why you think it should be added, sign the post, and wait for reply.     "