GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not) 

 #Is it reasonably well written? 
 #:A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:  
 #::  
 #:B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
 #::  
 #Is it factually accurate and verifiable? 
 #:A. Provides references to all sources:   
 #::  
 #:B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:   
 #::  
 #:C. No original research:  
 #::  
 #Is it broad in its coverage? 
 #:A. Main aspects are addressed:   
 #::  
 #:B. Remains focused:  
 #::  
 #Does it follow the neutral point of view policy. 
 #:Fair representation without bias:  
 #::  
 #Is it stable? 
 #: No edit wars, etc:  
 #::  
 #Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? 
 #:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:   
 #::  
 #:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
 #::  
 #Overall:  
 #:Pass or Fail:  
 #::  
 #::  
 *I have made a few copy edits, grammar fixes and slight rewording. If you disagree, you are free to revert. 
 Congratulations on a good article!