:::Podiobooks is  not "podcast novels" it is a single distributor of them. Highlighting it in such a manner gives it WP:UNDUE weight, and is clearly inappropriate for the topic. From your other remarks in these topics, I realize you enjoy this medium, but please look at it from a neutral fashion. Podiobooks is not the same as an iPod, nor can you claim that it has helped popularize anything without reliable sources, which have not been provided though they have now been referred to twice. Please refrain from continuing to readd this section each time you reply, and obtain consensus to have such content. To continue to readd it in a manner is considered edit warring and is against Wikipedia guidelines, and can be considered disruptive. Remember, Wikipedia works on a consensus basis, and is a community. While you may feel the section is appropriate, another editor (i.e. myself) has disputed it, pointing to policies and guidelines. Thus far, your argument appears to be based purely on personal opinions and your own like of the medium. If Podiobooks has been significantly discussed in the New York Times, Time magazine, etc, that would seem to indicate it is a notable company and should have its own article. It should not, however, have a section devoted to it here.    ·