::::::You know, I really am trying here. I wrote this article ten fucking months ago and the day before it appears on the main page this discussion is being had. You haven't read the sources and you say this is unacceptable? You cannot dictate what is in the article, especially if you haven't read the sources. A footnote to state that the term "transvestite" was used in the late 1960s to refer to men who dressed as women, and that some participants who were in drag that night have since labeled themselves transgender or transsexual is not unreasonable. There is a way to work together on this. The crap about Judy Garland is in a footnote and that is much more pervasive in lore about Stonewall than the precise labeling of the participants.  
 ::::::Is there some reason we're the only people discussing this? Bueller? Or is it just entertaining to sit back and watch this unfold?