I will continue in removing the opinions of one book which are put there with the only intent of turning the article into a anti-Manstein pamphlet. The claims about the alleged content of Lost victories are clearly false as was already proven by quotes from Lost victories. 
 Nobody has tried to refute that. When reviews of lost victories are put,positve reviews have to be included. Actually there are a large majority of extremely positive reviews on the book. 
 The alleged forgeries by Manstein on the Stalingrad campaign do not exist. There was only ever a discussion in the sixties on the Eismann mission. Nothing to do with documents,let alone forging them. Manstein had nothing to answer for. He had not ordered Stalingrad to be taken and held. Paulus had to justify that he did not even attempt to execute Mansteins order to attack towards the relief force. Mansteins advice to Hitler was much more complex  than what the disputed text tries to show in an obvious attempt to attack Mansteins reputation. 
 The over the top allegations about Mansteins involvement with killing jews and commissars are again the reflection of a particular opinion. 
 The article has to be neutral. It certainly cannot reflect one opinion.