2007 (UTC) 

 :::(1) It doesn't matter what the toy producers 'say' their intent is. 
 :::(2) It doesn't matter if 'sexiness' is talked about in Bratz materials. 
 :::(3) It doesn't matter that the dolls are supposed to be teenagers. That doesn't mean teens are buying them. G.I. Joe is a man in his late 20s to early 30s. 
 :::(4) They don't reflect the way all modern teenagers dress. They reflect the way (a) hookers, and (b) teenagers who dress like hookers because of lax parents, dress. 
 :::What matters is that the dolls dress in a slutty manner, they are clearly marketed to small girls, and small girls will be inspired to think that is ok and encouraged to dress that way at an early age. It doesn't matter if they don't know anything about sexuality - they are being sexualized and made to look like tramps. That is the fact: slutty dolls encouraging slutty behavior, regardless of all the bull about "believing in yourself" the company puts out.  That's not even to mention the shallow materialism and consumerism, and 'shopping & possessions' obsession it encourages. That's even more mindless and obscene than the clothing. What a poor, poor waste of a child's time and mind. In my opinion, that is. Hopefully, that will explain why a criticism section is indeed relevant to the article.   02:07, 23 December