::::I wholeheartedly agree with this.  The article is outright obfuscating the radical change that happened and doesn't reflect the bold (the stupid kind of bold) step of starting everything (the product, the community) from scratch again, confronting everyone with a new product (under the same moniker) that lost 90% of its functionality.  That's pretty much as if Ford would say "the last cars we made were a technological dead end, let's start with the model T again" and WP doesn't even notice.