August 2005 (UTC) 

 :To repeat what I have said before it is not a POV it is "official policy on Wikipedia" see Wikipedia:Naming conventions: 
 ::Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. 
 :Further the Napoleon link is there for the same reason NOT because "Napoleon was practically the original" but because it follown policy, and as yet no one has come up with any evidence that "William the silent is a sufficiently well-known" as William of Orange in English for an unqualified mention of that name in English to warrent a disambiguation  07:25, 26