:This issue tends to come up more on the individual party pages rather than here but the issues are one and the same (and it's ridiculous to have the two giving different outcomes). In a strong two party system left and right at any one moment is generally defined by the positions of the traditional parties of the left and the right, not by some dubious website like political compass. It is POV to repeatedly change particularly the Labour Party description to a variant of "right" when it's a member of the Socialist International, sits in the Party of European Socialists and is almost the classic definition of successful centre left party. Ditto the other parties (and I think trying to reclassify the Lib Dems, whilst admittedly a problem to define since they dropped their "never one thing nor the other but somewhere in between" position in the mid 1990s, on the basis of every new policy statement is messy in the extreme). Calling the changes "neutral, scientific, objective POV" is setting up a strawman and radical changes that are against the long standing consensus, especially when the changes are based on dubious or unclear methodology, is flawed. Such changes should have consensus - the fact they have not been made by others is a sign that your POV is not widely considered NPOV.