Hello, there. I see that you have posted a message in which you have criticised other editors as being "not well-mannered", and in the same message you have referred to others as "mindless, goofy and half-witted" and "goofy, ruthless, foolish", and called someone "animal, moron bastard" and "great stone-hearted, ill-treated moron", and told him to "rot in hell". Is this a joke, or are you really so out of touch with reality that you think that is consistent with criticising editors for not being "well-mannered"? You were given instructions on how you could request an unblock, but you decided not to do so, preferring instead to pour out venom such as the excerpts I have quoted. Your talk page access has been revoked, as such rantings are an abuse of editing privileges. You may or may not like to consider how good an idea it was, when blocked for (amongst other things) personal attacks, to use your talk page for personal attacks. I see that you already have had at least eight blocks citing personal attacks as reasons. I wonder if it has ever crossed your mind that, if you had simply stopped such attacks, you would have been able to carry on editing Wikipedia without problems. Well, that's up to you. If you value the transient pleasure of knowing that you have attacked someone else enough to be willing to be worth sacrificing access to editing Wikipedia, then so be it.