"%3ADokdo%2FArchive_10&diff;=132671413&oldid;=132665659 two examples] from the archives which come to mind but I can find more if someone asks. The reason for this is that if the debate has been thorough then little more can be said and there is a general Wikipedia convention that one does not make multiple requests just to get the result one desires because most editors have more constructive things to do with the time they spend editing Wikipedia. However this convention is not set in stone and there may be cases were due to circumstances it is necessary to have a requested move in under six months but I have not read any reasons in this section which seem to me reasonable reasons for another WP:RM. For anyone who puts in such a request in under six months should consider that it may well be counter productive for them because some editors will express the opinion that a move back should not take place just because the WP:RM is too soon.   

 ::: WP:IAR — A mistake was made here and that will draw in a far larger sample of opinions. A review should be held much sooner than six months. See my post below from the other day.   

 ::::The requested move was very widely advertised on WP:RM, Two separate  RfCs (politics and geography) and on the Village Pump. It is difficult to see how a far larger sample of opinions could be been engendered for a requested move.   

 ::::: I don't doubt any of it. Has the NYT commented on this move (yet)? I believe that the move itself will draw much attention to the move over time and that it inevitably will be moved back; WP:SOAPBOX etc. I'll keep an eye out for the move back and any discussions about it.   

 The following should put English/Non-english aspect of name to an end: 
 Modern Language Association (MLA): 
 ""myanmar."" The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. 11 Oct. 2007. . 
 Modern Language Association (MLA): 
 ""myanmar."" Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 11 Oct. 2007. . 
 Modern Language Association (MLA): 
 ""myanmar."" WordNet® 3.0. Princeton University. 11 Oct. 2007. . 
 The American Heritage® 
 New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third EditionPublished by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved., © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company. 
 All those English language dictionaries prove that Myanmar is an English word. Rename back to Myanmar!  

 A significant point is being missed here. True, endonyms and exonyms are often at variants: Germany is a fine example of a country and language with more names than it has people. Myanmar's situation is more than a cross-linguistic variation. Its constitutional name, Myanmar, was renamed in 1989 by the recognised (though unpopular) administration. Now Britain, which until 50 years earlier had ruled Burma, chose not to recognise the constitutional name. Indeed, nobody can dictate their name on other national or linguistic communities; and the USA in turn has followed suit and also rejected Myanmar. Never the less, every other country in the world recognised Myanmar, from Israel to Chile, from Fiji to Mali and from South Korea to Iceland. It is also recognised as Myanmar by world organisations such as NATO, the EU, the African Union, EFTA, OPEC, APEC, NAFTA, CAFTA, FIFA, UEFA, The Olympic authorities, even the UN. Now, sure, this is not Greek encyclopaedia, exclusive to the Greek language community which are largely based in Greece and Cyprus: however, this is English language encyclopaedia, and English is not solely fixed to the UK and the USA, it is the language of other countries too; more importantly, organisations to which English is an official language. Here on Wikipedia, there is no rule to say that you spell words by their American or English ways (no need to replace centre with center and vice versa), likewise there is no need to replace such terms as fall with autumn. The Englishman edits a page, the American adds something to the same page, the result: something comprehensible to anyone who has learnt any form of English. If the policy of accepting all forms on the same page continue, we need to look at Myanmar/Burma on the bigger picture, and not just thorugh a