== Sorry, seems like there are facts and bias in dispute in this article == 

 Regarding bias:  The use of broadly perjerative terms is troubling.  For instance, "stillborn digital revolution" and "at this point, no movie directors are seriously using HD cameras to make theatrical films."  Huh?  What about Spike Lee, Steven Soderberg, Michael Mann, David Fincher, George Lucas, Bryan Singer, James Cameron, Lars von Trier, and Robert Rodriguez?  One failure like "Shark Boy" does not a "stillborn" digital revolution make. 

 (The author's petulant response to the post alleging bias doesn't help his argument against his bias:  denigrating phrases like "weird culture," "adolescent fantasy," "wishful thinking" and "loudmouth dreamer?"  Whew!  Let's talk rationally here.  I doubt the many millions of dollars being invested by films studios, filmmakers and technology companies into evolving video into worthy competition for film involve wishful thinking, unless they're financially incompetent.)  

 Conversely, some of the ADVANTAGES of digital cinema could also be taken issue with as stated.  The "digital cinematography" W-entry claims that the digital format actually does not, in the overall, save money in production, and cites concrete reasons.  Which one is right?  Which claim about digital cameras' superiority in low-light situations is accurate? 

 These two articles have been suggested for merger.  I suggest a review of the facts and general attitude beforehand.