Re:  == 
 Hello again. I really don't know enough about spelling reform to definitively evaluate the degree to which the article is biased toward one side or another. Wikipedia's neutrality policy requires that all significant views be represented "fairly and without bias", where the significance of a view is determined by the presence or absence of reliable sources that advance it. I would assume that proponents of spelling reform constitute a minority of the relevant academic community ... as such, their views should be presented as that of a minority. Whether the article does that to an appropriate or inappropriate degree, I cannot say without actually researching the topic (about which I know almost nothing) 

 If you have any specific issues or suggestions regarding the improvement of the article, you may find it more productive to contact members of one of the subprojects of Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics (or to post on one of the project talk pages). If you have any general questions or if there is any other matter with which I could try to help you, please feel free to . Cheers, '''''' ''''  

 :Hi, I replied on the article talk page. -    

 ==