====Not enough options==== 
 I agree that there should be separate articles to describe the Geographical location and the navy base. 
 In addition there should be an additional article, with description of all the prisons and detention centres.   

 In my opinion those descriptions of the prisons should be brief, and each prison should have an article devoted to them.  They used to each have an article devoted to them.  The guy who merged them did a really crappy job.  And the history of their edits strongly suggest that their real intention was to obfuscate information that was embarrassing to fans of President Bush's detainee policy.  He (unfairly IMO) accused me of starting articles about Guantanamo detainees in order to spoof Google.  He accused me of trying to multiply the number of hits those who searched for Guantanamo, and abuse would find.  He initiated the formal deletion steps against close to a dozen articles I started.   

 When he first leveled this accusation against I thought it was ridiculous and impractical, in addition to being unethical and a betrayal of the wikipedia community.  But, after doing some research, I realized that he was correct about it being practical.  Many commercial sites, and some other nonprofit sites, republish wikipedia articles, so, for many topics, most of the google hits are mirrors of wikipedia articles. 

 When attempting to get others to agree to delete the articles I started failed, he merged the articles on the prisons with the support of just one other wikipedian.  I believe he was guilty of exactly what he accused me of.  I think his partisan and insincere merge had a powerful negative impact on the usefulness of the Wikipedia's coverage of Guantanamo issues.   

 Anyhow, if we are going to vote, we should be voting on whether this existing article, whatever it is called, should contain so much material about the prisons, or whether it should be moved to article(s) about the prisons.