== Copyedits == 

 Hi! 

 Great article, Cirt. Finally a Wikipedia article that relates to my everyday life. Har har. 

 Here's what I'm thinking, in a chunky, rambling list. We already acknowledged a couple of these points on my talk page, but I thought I'd elaborate. Obviously, you don't have to take any of these suggestions deep down. Just passing observations. 

 * Reduce the size of the lead. I think its basic structure is sound, in that it basically mirrors the main text like it's supposed to. But you can definitely take out many of the details. For example, you can cut the list of three films the lawyer cited and  "In the 2005 book edited by Carly Milne Naked Ambition". At least in the lead.  
 * I mentioned flow to you on my talk page. Just to note, I think the "Trademark appeal" section is fine. But I almost feel the other stuff should be rearranged into a new section or two. Having a "Controversy" just makes sense to me. I guess that's what the "Analysis" section kinda is right now. But I just feel like there should be a section where the critics state their minds and then the site responds. You know... now that I think about it, I'm not crazy about this idea. Never mind. 
 * Maybe have a "Promotions" or "Public Relations" section. I dunno. I just feel like too much is lumped together in that one section, "Film production". That's probably because your (Cirt's) main focus is more the use of the word "fuck" than it is pornography. But, after all, Fucking Machines is a pornography website, and I feel there should be more focus on that. 
 * The phrase  "In 2009 the site featured 50 different devices in its films" pops up a couple times. I'm a little confused by that. Do you mean literally in 2009 or that they had accumulated 50 devices in their films between 2007 and 2009?  
 Have a good day,