Thank you for your response RegentsPark; I now think I fully understand your reasoning, and it is certainly not bad. The situation remains the same in that as a community we need to agree on a reasoning. This is where the medcom can help. So I hope that incoherent unprogressing banter is making a very convincing case for MedCom intervention! If, however, the MedCom doesn't want to dirty its hands in this way, would others be supportive if I initiated a structured discussion designed to gain consensus on the fundamental reasoning behind a naming choice? My comment about bullets, by the way, referred to the general linear lists of people of each persuasion adding their views, not the structure of RegentsPark's comments.