:::I see that the edit dispute is continuing: a few editors whose edits relate entirely, or almost entirely to this topic, are repeatedly removing material about this based on an unpersuasive argument that insurance isn't relevant to the topic, when it obviously is.  I think that we should go back to the 20 July 2012 version excerpted above: the material about the Omidis is clearly relevant to the subject (and is being treated as such by reliable sources).  As for the court documents noted by AndyTheGrump, it appears to me that they are being used only to verify factual details  and as such would be acceptable under WP:PRIMARY, but those footnotes could be omitted if editors prefer.