Agreed. The facts are there but the wording needs to be cleaned up. Wikipedia is for facts so using redundant terms like "supposedly" are not necessary. Report the facts, give both sides of the story equal weight, and move on. The article isn't bad though especially considering the lack of knowledge about how supertrhive works and their refusal to give even a simplified ingredient list. If someone with better writing skills than I would simply re-word it then I think it would be fine.