::::::What we have now is misrepresentation of the sources. IDF said two were members of Hamas, and there IS evidence (such as Hamas seniors admitting) that IDF's statement was correct. Currently the article reads that there is no evidence for #1 or #2, which is incorrect. Also, the article reads "no evidence was offered" - according to Haaretz it was offered (by Shin Bet), but not to the press. "No evidence was published" would be more factually correct.  
 ::::::No smoking gun is one interpretation of Shin Bet's evidence not being published. Another would be their not willing to expose the sources.