, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 

 ::, I read the section you mentioned. Neither the CDC, UCR, or NCVS definitions are the legal definition of rape. Each study used its own definition, which is typical of studies and surveys. The actual definition varies on the state or the country, as noted in the International Law. Given that no other page on sexual violence limits the discussion of the topic based on the legal definition, I fail to see this page should be the exception.  

 ::The previous version misrepresented the findings of the CDC study by obscuring the rates of female-perpetrated sexual violence men reported. Given that the rest of the section refers to "sexual victimization," "sexual abuse," and "sexual encounters," I see no reason not to mention the other findings. None of the other sections on this page, or any other sexual violence page, limits what statistics can be included based on what definition is used by a given study.  

 ::The sections should be written from a neutral point of view, so if person takes issue with acknowledging information because it does not coincide with their personal views, such a person should rethink editing Wikipedia. Various experts are clear that due to under-reporting we cannot be certain of the frequency of female-on-male sexual violence. As a result, it is inaccurate to make any concrete claims about the frequency or rarity of any victims or rapists. It also undermines the intent of this section, which is to inform people about all the findings.   23:16