::::::::The idea of releases "deserving" images is a little strange. The question is whether the image increases reader understanding of the topic in a significant way. The fact that the tracklisting is different does not make the cover any more important. Take one of my articles, Over the Rainbow (Connie Talbot album); a featured article. This has been rereleased several times in different countries and at different times- some with different tracklistings. Though the releases are significant, and so are discussed, the covers are not- what the cover looked like with these releases is not important enough to be mentioned in the article text, and so it certainly isn't important enough to use a non-free image (which should, as per our non-free content guidelines, be used very sparingly) to illustrate. I repeat- what is the use of the cover actually illustrating?