::::::Yeah right. Let's see. You said ; "And what is all this about the Bright Star Catalog? There is nothing in the article about that, or about a particular photometric system being required. You're just making it up. I'll take your ideas to the correct place, but I have no clue where you get this stuff." 

 ::::::Now you say; "I tried Arianewiki1's original suggestion of using the Yale Bright Star catalogue and now suddenly that makes me worthy of personal abuse." 

 ::::::You said; "We have consensus, albeit a consensus of one.", and then "(HR mags down to Polaris)"  and  

 ::::::Hence, I replied; "Stating using the HR Catalogue as a basis of the list again shows your ill advice in this matter. As for the ridiculous alleged achieved claim of 'consensus', please stop acting like a adolescent jackass."  

 ::::::So why even bother to say you'd changed your mind to me? How I'm supposed to guess that you've changed your mind or that you may actual was proven incorrect? This is just like the variable star experience, where you fight tooth and nail to justify your untenable position, change your mind, and don't even acknowledge it. It is clear you have little interest in seeking any consensus at all, instead sticking to a belligerent attitude when challenged. Pity.