" 

 ==Not wrong== 
 Ictu, it is not that you are wrong, it is that you are simply not right. In other words, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. Let me give a brief summary of what is happening in the academic world: 

 ====Old Consensus==== 
 Most scholars in the last century have followed Philipp Vielhauer and Georg Strecker (in Hennecke and Schneemelcher NTApoc), and more recently AFJ Klijn (1992), in extrapolating from the Church Fathers 
 three distinct extra-canonical Jewish gospels: the Gospel of the Nazarenes, the Gospel of the Ebionites, and the Gospel of the Hebrews (composed in Greek). It should be noted that their were always some dissenting voices such as W. R. Schoemaker, Cassels, Parker and Nicholson. 
 {| class=""navbox collapsible collapsed"" style=""text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"" 
 |- 
 ! style=""background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;"" | 
 Citations from W. R. Schoemaker,  Cassels, Parker and Nicholson 
 |- 
 | style=""text-align:center;"" | References adduced by  
 |- 
 | style=""border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;"" | 

 *^ Pierson Parker, A Proto-Lucan basis for the Gospel according to the Hebrews. 
 * W. R. Schoemaker,  The Gospel According to the Hebrews Jstor, 1902. 
 *^ Walter Richard Cassels, Supernatural Religion. 

 *The Gospel According to the Hebrews - by Edward Byron Nicholson 1879 (POD 2009) 
 ""The Gospel according to the Hebrews: its fragments translated and annotated, first published 1879, is a highly creditable work. The list of fragments and of references has never been so completely made as by Nicholson"" -  Review of The Gospel according to the Hebrews 1879 by Robert Vaughan, The British quarterly review, Volume 71-72, Hodder and Stoughton, 1880. p 277 Google Link 

  
 Page 26 

  
 Page 82 
 |- 
 |  
 |} 

 ====New Consensus==== 
 Then, in 1998  Peter Lebrecht Schmidt, called this near consensus into question. Critically assessing the discussion from Schmidtke to Klijn, Schmidt showed that originally there was only one Jewish gospel, called the ""Gospel according to the Hebrews,"" which was subsequently translated into Greek and Latin. This work was powerful, well sourced and thought provoking. By the turn of the century it had become obvious ""that the state of the scholarly question had been thrown into the air and there is simply no consensus""  (Please read pages 245 - 246, ''Jewish believers in Jesus: the early centuries""  by Oskar Skarsaune & Reidar Hvalvik Hendrickson Publishers, 2007) 

 {| class=""navbox collapsible collapsed"" style=""text-align: left; border: 0px; mar