== Gates == 

 Saying that we're going by Wikipedia's definitions is a violation of WP:OR as well as an ASR violation, since Wikipedia isn't a reliable source.  If you look at all three of my edits (except the first one, all were made after your comment at my talk), I did my best to replace the current wording with a paraphrase of the policies that were explicitly mentioned beforehand.  I've made an allusion to WP:COMMON for the current titles of the -gateless articles and a WP:RS allusion for the inclusion of articles here in the first place.  Going by the wording to which I've now changed it, all scandals mentioned in the article either get -gate in "scholarly sources" or get other names in "scholarly sources": either way, they have to have scholarly sources, so they pass WP:N and would deserve to appear here even with the pre-Nyttend version of the intro.