It does not matter whether the original wording of the RFC is wildly biased.  Once an RFC has been posted, the answers are to the question as originally posted.  Changing the wording of the RFC (even if making it more appropriate in the abstract) causes the answers to be responses to a different question than was asked.  The fact that it also confuses the bots that maintain RFCs is secondary.  What is primary is that changing the wording of an RFC causes the responses to the RFC to be meaningless, as responses to a changing question.  You are permitted to post a separate RFC, or to explain in the discussion what question you think should have been asked.  You have so far gotten off easy in that you have been warned and not blocked.  Do not ever change the question of an RFC, even if the original RFC is completely stupid (which it isn't).  Completely stupid RFCs can be closed as stupid.  Changing RFCs cannot be reasonably closed.