==Stop your revert warring== 

 It is the wording of the scientist as the sentence begins with "Edward claimed...". So, plagarism charges are stupid at best. The fact that it is not in quotes is a simple mistake, not "stealing his ideas".    

 Oh and what you did was a revert, since you reverted the part about Edwards.  Your edits here  were minor as well so you didnt need to revert here . If you had listened your own advice and had "not revert the whole f*** article", none of this would happen. 

 And I didnt call you a vandal. I said "reverting vandalism", please learn to read properly. 

 Also, you've been reported Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Admin_Attention_PLEASE