:I have accepted your mediated proposal, but I will consider this informal mediation to have failed and will proceed to formal mediation, if Sumerophile again reverts to his version  as if he, and he alone, can select just those views of the scholars that agree with his own personal POV for readers to learn about here (in the case of Dr. Majidzadeh, he allows us to read what he stated in 1972, but not what he is actually saying now in books and in the press!!!!!) It seems that the existence of the internet, Google (where anyone can easily find scadroons of scholarly sources all exploring the possibility that Aratta existed here or there, as indeed we have done) and especially Wikipedia and open source projects, are the very bane of old-century style attempts at selective information control, but it is amusing that some are still trying desperately to tell us which ideas we are "allowed" to think and hear about, even in this day and age when such methods have become increasingly obsolete. I can see that you, like all the other editors who have tried to help in this case, have patiently tried to explain what our WP:NPOV policy means, while striving to be even-handed, but it all seems to have been in vain.  I will revert his attempts to censor the referenced information he personally disagrees with, and I will then appeal to formal mediation to see that NPOV policy is practised.