== The nature of consensus == 

 Just a reminder; consensus on Wikipedia is not dtermined by a head-count but by the quality of argument. I argue that WP:BLPSOURCES being part of long-standing policy, prohibits the use of the Daily Mail to source these quotes. What we would need to undo this would be a discussion to which more than just a few contribute, and in which convincing policy-based arguments are made for why this material sourced to this tabloid is essential. I do not see this. Perhaps a RfC is appropriate at this point? It would need to run for a couple of weeks and be closed by an uninvolved admin.