:I'll continue to revert you're edits... First, you're grammar is terrible.. Its close to impossible for me (and others, to understand what you are trying to write - so if you want to work on improving the article, you have to collaborate, since nobody will understand what you are writing).. Secondly, you don't use sources (with the exception of one which says Nguyen Phu trong is ranked no. 1 - I have many more sources from Nhan Dan which states that Truong Tan Sang is ranked no. 1... From the 1st plenum of the 10th Central Committee it has been decided that higher ranking does not mean more power, it just means that the person gained more votes during his election to the Politburo... So Nguyen Phu Trong is still one of the most powerful figures in the country.. He is the de facto no 1 or 2 (more probably 2), but not de jure.. What I'm trying to say is this; he is no. 1, but not in practice, its not official, because from the 1st plenum of the 10th Central Committee it was decided that the rankings would not the show the ranking of the individual members.