" 

 ==Content removal on ""drug design"" article by Jytdog on October 21, 2014== 
 The description of a structure based selectivity filter discovered by Ariel Fernandez was added today in the ""drug design"" entry and later removed by Jytdog. The work is relevant to structure-based drug design and that is why it was incorporated to the drug design wiki entry. Should the AF articles be quoted instead of his book dealing with structure-based drug design? But I saw books by others quoted in that wiki article as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 :and very clearly this IP address and  are the same editor, as the same message was just left here.    

 Absolutely. Nothing to hide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 == response by ""ariel fernandez"" == 

 MAJOR EDITOR IS NOT ACQUAINTED TO SUBJECT - RESPONSE TO JAMES B WATSON 

 Dear James B Watson and Wikipedia audience, 

 This is Ariel Fernandez.  
 It has been brought to my attention that a sign indicating an alleged connection between a major contributor to this article and myself, the subject, has been posted on my article. This is not correct, I am not aware of any such connection and I must request its immediate removal as it infringes BLP regulations. It is puzzling to me how you have made this inference, but it is simply not correct. 

 I have gone through the list of contributors to my article indicated in its history. I am not personally acquainted with any of them. I don´t know Jydog, James Watson (unless he is the double helix discoverer), Heidi Belkin (Hayde Belinky?) or any other person whose name is indicated in the history. I don´t understand how do you infer such connections or what you are trying to do. I recall having met Heidi way back on a legal matter.  

 While vastly incomplete, the article on me as it now stands seems fair, objective and accurate as far as I can see. It sems to be fairly well documented and seems to have been taken from verifiable sources including websites that I have edited myself.  

 I must ask you to please refrain from publishing such inferences. As far as I know, anybody is free to contribute to wikipedia provided the subject is notable, the info is accurate and well documented and the tone is fair and balanced. 

 Should you have further questions, I would be happy to discuss them. My personal mail is  
 ariel@afinnovation.com 

 Feel free to contact me at your convenience. 
 Ariel Fernandez, Ph. D.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 : I think (and please don't take this as authoritative, I did not add the tag) the inference is made from the fact that one of the major contributors is called Arifer, which looks like it might stand for Ariel Fernandez. Also, the pages here and here may be interesting for you to read (I highly recommend reading them).    

 Dear Richard Yin: 
 I have NOT authorize and I don´t know any contributor with that alias. There are people with different vested interests. I simply have no control. All I am saying is that if you state that there is a connection you need to prove it under the standards of the law: Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit. 

 : It seems to me, first of all, that wording like ""appears to have"", ""may require"", etc seems to properly indicate that the tag shouldn't be taken as a statement of fact but as a ""this is what we can tell so far, we might be wrong"". Moreover, the idea that a contributor has a connection with the subject does not necessarily mean that the subject requested, authorized, or knows about the submission.  I think