, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 
 :::::::I understand what you're saying and I agree with you. There are two separate issues here. First, some things affect men disproportionately. This is a fact. For example, facial hair affects men disproportionately. The second issue is why it happens. This is not always clear (genetics, hormones, heredity, lots of reasons). So when you start looking at certain groups of men, compared to certain groups of women, it may not always hold up. For example, comparing a group of Native American men who genetically sometimes have very little facial hair to a group of women with Hypertrichosis is not a good comparison. So what I'm saying, is that the scope of the article addresses how violence affects men disproportionately (compared to all other groups in general). Then when we start talking about "why" it's happening, that's a separate discussion, and we need to be careful when we draw conclusions. This is when we really need to examine what the sources say very closely.   02:48