Although I don't like military junta, I believe that name changing of the country is reasonable. We should not think that everything done by military junta are wrong and need to against. 'Burma' come from native word 'Bamar' which is the name of majority people of Myanmar, not the country's name. So 'Burma' is basically wrong reference. If we call the country 'Burma', it make neglect to other 134 kinds of minority people of the country, Shan, Mon, Rakhine, Chin, Kachin and many others. Since long time ago before military regime on 1988, 'Myanmar' was used in native writing to refer country's name.  Military junta have never needed to force people to use 'Myanmar' because it was already widely used. Today, almost all of people from here forget about the name 'Burma'. Actually we don't like the name 'Burma' because it was given by British colonialist and really different form native pronounce. Sometime we may use 'Burma' in dealing with western people because we guess that some western people only know 'Burma'. But there is no need to doubt that regional countries fully recognize as 'Myanmar'. Democracy movement groups will use 'Burma' because they want to against all things done by military junta, but it doesn't represent all 'Myanmar' people's desire. Ceylon changed its name to Sri Lanka on 1972, nowadays nobody call it Ceylon. Cambodia was also changed from Kampuchea, there was no problem.British, US and some government remain to call 'Burma' because they don't want to give recognize what done by military junta. It is just a political matter. (Although we don't like)Current government cannot be said illegal government because it was already recognized by UN. Then, even the country is changed to a democratic country, there is no reason to change its name back  to 'Burma' because 'Myanmar' is already reasonable. So I propose that the article title to change 'Myanmar' and make a redirect for 'Burma' page to 'Myanmar' page.