:First of all, you could have responded in my section instead of starting your own section.  Next, why this level of attention for Byrne compared to anyone?  Whether or not something is interesting is less important than if it is relevant.  That John Byrne was "killed" on Law and Order is interesting but has no relevancy.  The McCloud triangle is to me uninteresting and at any rate irrelevant. 

 :Next, why reversion instead of reworking the article?  If everything stands up to scrutiny, it'll get back anyway, so why not work the article?  Is it because, now alerted to how people with an axe to grind have mutated it, people who want a straight article may now express their voice?  Is this threatening somehow?  Why is it if I complain it's a strong arm tactic? 

 :Also, viewpoint is anathema to what is supposed to happen in an article.  NPOV is the idea, even when it's complimentary to the subject.  Viewpoints from anyone tend, in fact, to fail the concept of NPOV.  As to Byrne being controversial, Byrne is only a controversial figure to those intent on wanting to say Byrne is a controversial figure.  To most, he is a guy that draws comic books. 

 :What other entries contain is, in fact, quite relevant, in terms of balance and merit.  While space here is not an issue, for John Byrne, a writer and drawer of comic books, to have a much larger entry than Dali, Clarence Thomas, Stan Lee, or Howard Hughes, shows obsession and a lack of perspsective on the part of the article writers.  My contention is that a lot of what has been poured into this article is minutia that only the most fanboy of fanboys cares about. 

 :In summary, a serious Wikipedia entry wouldn't be cluttered with irrelevancies simply because an editor found them interesting.  It would be better if the article was worked as Gamaliel said it would be and a consensus reached.  The art style entry was not worked in this way, is minutia, and could easily be pared to its opening and closing paragraphs (pending attribution) or done away with entirely.