::I would prefer that the side articles not be deleted, as I think they are appropriate. As you've probably noticed above, the comments were made by Skomorokh. (And his (or her) comments were intended to be helpful, not a confrontation or warning). 

 ::Is your point that "Thougy Adjuster" is not a violation because it is shorter than the others? 

 ::About the WP: OR "policy"—it is not an absolute policy, it states on the article page that it is a guideline. Because of the nature of the material of the Urantia Book, it would seem proper to consider that side articles be allowed. The main article would be improved if there were some side articles (as we've tried to do). Verifiable objective third party evidence is proper for most of the articles for Wikipedia, but a rigid application of that idea here would not be proper for the UB in my view, as I've said, because of the nature of the context of the book itself. And it may be 100, 200, 300, 400 years before any commentaries on the theology of it appear.