== Copied from user page== 

 ==genocide== 

 re: your note on my page 

 I am *not* arguing against your statements, but you're changing sourced and cited text to statements. There was, for example a quote on there that had a 'citation needed'. You removed it, stating merely that the wording was correct. That's *not* good enough for an encyclopedia. They were calling for a citation that would actually *support* your arguments; removing it so that people like myself, who go through looking for 'citation needed' notes to cite won't know that the fact needs to be supported. That means, in half a year, when you're on vacation for a month, someone might come across it and say, 'Huh. That's not cited. Out it goes.' 

 While it might feel like a blog or regular website, the point of Wikipedia is to provide knowledge. When you make changes such as referring to the schools as fomenting genocide without citing it, you're not helping the people who will come here looking for information. If you have books, scholarly references, newspapers and such to support your view, we'd LOVE it to be added to the article. My issue has nothing to do with whether its genocide or not, but with uncited things that could be opinions (especially because of their emotional load) being added. 

 Use scholarly language, keep emotion out of it, and document your work with citations and the info that you no doubt have, and no one will revert your work.