:::::You had heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual and hermaphrodite listed as genders in the section; I'm stating that they usually are not defined as genders; that statement is not an opinion, it's a fact. They also are not usually defined as general roles. This is why we don't mention any such definition in the WP:Leads of those Wikipedia articles. In fact, such definitions are not yet in those articles at all. Now the Overview/background the section doesn't list heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual and hermaphrodite as genders; I noted that this is good. I never stated anything about "A gay male who doesn't fit the 'gender role' of a gay male is no different than a straight female who isn't at all feminine." Nor did I state anything about "[a] man who is effeminate [ceasing] to have a gender." I was not talking about the the topic of gender roles in non-heterosexual communities. As for gay, the Gay article is clear about how the term is usually defined, and that it does not exclusively refer to males.