:* Well, it can always be reverted back. I agree that the info on the COFASA was very limited on the original COFA article. However, I still don't see much point in have a seperate article on the COFASA, considering 
 :a)The COFA article is a stub and could easily incorporate info about COFASA 
 :b)Info about COFA is very limited and again, could all be incorporate in the COFA page.