(UTC) 

 == Badass? No, sorry. == 

 This man was the Leeroy Jenkins of WW2. Because he rushed into battle "wid a sawd, y'all" dosn't somehow make him a good soldier, it makes him one lucky son of a bitch that he managed to not get killed. His idiocy (sorry, badassery to some of you) didn't help him or save him, it was sheer luck. As for the "oh, he rounded up 42 Germans", no. He and another officer snuck in, as unsurprisingly it is quite easy to sneak two people in than an entire regiment, and captured a single man. That single man instructed his troops to surrender. 

 :Wait, are you saying that Leeroy Jenkins isn't a badass?   

 Seems the ONLY time he actually accomplished anything was when he wasnt being an idiotic moron and actually using tactics.    Harlequin 

 I'm assuming your grasp of "tactics" comes from playing Rainbow 6? Or is that me being an "idiotic moron"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 The title of this section is quite correct and anyone referring to Jack Churchill as a 'badass' is either mistaken or indulging in slander against the great man. Any historian worth his salt can tell you that Jack Churchill was a model of anal hygiene, eschewing mere toilet paper in favour of sandpaper, Brillo pads and a bidet which shot sulphuric acid at his anus.    

 All this stuff is irrelevant.  The article doesn't give him a label.    

 Can we just delete this section? It's completely irrelevant to the article. Nowhere in the article does it ever make the claim that he was a "badass".   01:33, 24 August 2015