::::::::Very well. It was merely a misunderstanding. I was simply referring to Protocol 10 in general, citing the twenty two percent of deaths as a valid reason for why it should be covered. I did not intend to imply that this piece of trivia should be included in the plot. Your summary, however, should still be revised a little more. Do you wish for me to point out, in great detail, every disagreeable aspect of the plot section as it stands now? You use the same words far too often, and there are indeed certain parts which need to be removed due to unnecessary information and inaccuracies. However, your "more than generous" comment indicates that you are unwilling to compromise. I need a solid response: Are you prepared to consider some valid concerns and revise as needed?