:I assume this is in reference to this edit, removing material with an edit summary implying that the material is alleging that the someone is being accused of a crime (per BLPCRIME).  However, I think we're getting our concepts confused here; this is not a situation where someone is being accused of a State or Federal crime (i.e., something for which one could be indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and/or sentenced).  Rather, the writer/professor (Reynolds) is accusing the OU President (Boren) of "breaking the law", meaning that he believes that in his capacity as University President of a state institution, Boren is not abiding by the U.S. constitution as a state actor.  Accusing someone of "committing a crime" is defamation per se, while accusing someone of "breaking the law" is not.  Similarly, the former runs afoul of BLPCRIME, while the latter does not.  Regards,