Good! I am glad this is going to discussion, as I think it should, regardless of whether the outcome is in favor of the ggmania or gamespot link. I do believe that there are enough references to gamespot in the article, and that another one is not needed. I have not received ANY MESSAGE from google saying that gameguru mania is a "dangerous site" in anyway, as you seem to think. The key ideas here, in my opinion, are this:  

 *1) My browser does not display that the site has any offending 'malware' or anything of such.  
 *2) Even if there is a problem, which I do not think there is, that is irrelevant to wikipedia. Wikipedia does not get dictated by what google says or does not say.  

 That's my take on the situation. But, as I'll say again, I believe that User:Dachannien has acted in the best interests of everyone in bringing this to discussion, and I totally support his actions in this regard.