::I have two responses and questions to your edits: 

 1.) If you are going to tag the article, you should explain here specifically what language or parts of it warrant that tag. I see nothing that does. 
 2.) Lemelson's notability seems to me to rest on several pillars, but one of the biggest is the profound impact his activist investing has had on a handful of equities. He is, for instance, pretty much singularly credited with the massive correction in WWE. That information is thus biographical and central to this article. It should be restored, I think. 

 Look forward to your response and thoughts.