:I see you've done some substantial work.  I would say that in this case, your boldness has improved the article to a point where there is substantial new information to be evaluated in an AFD and the old one is no longer valid.  So removing the tag is fine.  However, the article has a slight COI/Promotional feel to it.  If you are connected to the subject of the article, please be careful to edit in a neutral way and do not use language that gives me feel of an op-ed.v/r -