::::: I am trying to give examples of the sort of people who might raise the objections mentioned. Apologists is already cited. Mabey pastors, priests, rabbis, seminary professors, spiritual guides, and some religous writers. Also, non-Abrahamic examples need to be sought out (like figures in the Native American population ... mabey Shaman?). (I'll put in some of these into the article.)  
 ::::: What I would like included are examples of religous individuals that would object (other than the "main defender" [eg., apologists]). Some evangelists, especially the televangelists (a sub-category of evangelists), do defend against perceived attacks and would take such use of terminology as an attack on thier religion (as I have heard them say). As to the reason why somebody would want to object to such use, I am not sure. Your proposition that win others over by claiming the uniqueness of their religious belief is possible.  
 ::::: BTW, "WLNK" is shorthand for "wikilink" (wlnk). [I think that you tooks that as 'wink']  
 ::::: Sincerely,   
 ::::: PS., If the terminology of the Abrahamic mythologies are changed ... the same should be done to the Native American mythologies.