Anon to Chairboy and Friends:  knock yourselves out making the article seem as "non-biased" as possible, although the effect you will achieve is just being shills for this corrupt corporation.  When something stinks like sh-t, it's very hard to call it roses with a straight face.   

 As more facts about ITT's legal criminal enterprise are gathered, they will, on their own, validate any supposed bias.  The intention of the Controversy section is not flamebait.  Since 'Marquette' here avoided the dimploma mill trap of ITT, why he 'hates' it is beyond the scope of this missive.  If I can save one dumb kid from making the most expensive mistake of his and his folk's lives, it'll be worth it to expose these ITT bastards.  The facts support my reporting.  The only "abuse" of this 'free' encyclopedia (CAVEAT EMPTOR) other than vandals is turning a valid entry into an advertisement for a crappy non-school like ITT.