== Again and Again == 

 Sandstein, I am wondering whether users are permitted to escape sanctioning by hit-and-run tactics, that is striking some articles, and then retreating in time, before admins can (or are willing to) act effetively? After a hiatus of weeks or months, rinse and repeat, deja vu all over again, etc. 

 You seem to be very patient with , who has a habit, apart from his back and forth semi retiring, to ask you here to intervene against his foes. On the other hand, only six weeks ago, you readily blocked me, for what you called "nationalist WP:BATTLEground conduct and harrassment". I'm wondering how you would describe the recent behavior of Loosmark? You once again complied with his demands and Digwuren-restricted his opponent , so one might say that harrassment was successful here. Please look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination), where Loosmark, against overwhelming consensus of many neutral editors, does not hesitate to once again defend the vanity article on EEML member Poeticbent. Can this be explained other than with nationalist WP:BATTLEground conduct on behalf of a fellow Pole? 

 Following Loosmark's examples, may I ask you about , who showed up again recently, and got warned by FPaS, but not placed on Digwuren notice?  

 Another example is , a very seasoned user and sock puppeteer (self admitted to ) who was placed under Digwuren editing restriction in 2008, occasionally returns to conduct edit wars, mainly on German/Polish place naming. In the summary to his recent four reverts in prolonged editwars, that include adding Polish claims to German folklore figure Rübezahl, switching of historic German place names to current Polish ones in Wilhelm Gnapheus and Mauritius Ferber, and repeatedly re-adding a superfluous mentioning of Danzig/Gdańsk to the article on the Swiss printing hose Henricus Petrus, he called me a hardheaded edit warrior.  

 Just wondering.