I don't have time to deal with this, but it needs attention. This article was mentioned as the "worst on wikipedia" on, I believe, the Randi forums. Using only biographies to write something like this is ludicrous. "Mediumship" last I checked, was also not accepted as a real phenomenon by the academic/scientific community, and as such needs to be described as a minority view. If this article is to be on wikipedia, let it be written around newspaper articles. Sources who have fact-checkers can be presented as fact. Sources who do not must be represented as claims or opinion. Also, can somebody provide evidence of notability? Thanks