::The entire premise of your edited revert is absurd.  "Terrorism" is not a grab-bag of definitions of which you can pick and choose.  Terrorism actually means something when it is used.  It conveys information.  Your article does not convey information.  It is as far from a factual representation as a definition can get.  We have already been over this in the five pages of discussion over the term, representing hundreds of hours of work.  Please edit the definition we fixed, the definition that accurately represents the various distinct ways that terrorism is used.  I'll pull it back up one more time.  Please remember that, whether or not we are admins, we are all bound by the same Wikipedia writers' rules of engagement.