:::Hi Ceemow.  On "cans of worms," I hear you, but from now on let's bury it in the past.  Thank you for reading the "comment on content" link.  On the Leonnig material, I was saying that it was posted here on the talk page (not posted in the article itself), and that it had only been 24 hours so a little more patience is proper courtesy.  I'm sure ThinkEnemies will reply in kind soon enough, or add a suggested version to the draft he is working on for us to consider.  On the Brooklyn DA material, it was inserted into the main article yesterday in the state and local government subsection; look for it in the edit history, the 18:38 / 1 Mar 2010 post by .  With regard to your concerns that a massive restructuring of the article needs to be discussed here on the Talk page first, the answer is of course it will, and no one is suggesting otherwise.  If what I said above about a "sandbox page" confused you, it means that we will all look at the proposed restructuring on a new page, separate from the main article and separate from this Talk page, so that things don't get to cluttered.  Inside that sandbox, we can make as many suggestions and edits as need be without modifying the actual article as it stands right now, and without getting this Talk page so cluttered that it becomes totally unmanageable.  Of course, there will be a link here on this Talk page to that sandbox page, so that we can all navigate there.