, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 
 :No, I'm not missing your point. I'm disagreeing with it. Davison DO develop inventions. The DO do product development. If you can find a source which states that they don't, then I'll agree with you. But there is no source which says the product design/development work Davison does is sub-standard. Go back to my original comments: I am saying that YOU have misunderstood the nature of the scam in that you have failed to understand at which stage in the process the inventor is being cheated. They are being cheated with misleading indications of success, not in the work that is done to develop their inventions.    15:57