::There is no support for reference to the newsletter that NEHGS refers to early in the discussions of Warren's ancestry. I can't support any references to that newsletter. It is not a primary document.  It is not a secondary source. It is not a source, period.  It is hearsay. It is not appropriate to go back and re-write all of these things that happened. NEHGS does not put any kind of credibility in that newsletter and just because one editor keeps pushing it does not make that newsletter important to this topic.  The fact is that Warren has not provided one piece of documentary evidence to support her ancestral claims and that is what this article should clearly state.  The point of this article is tell the issue, as quickly as possible, and let the reader make up their own mind. It is not for us to re-write history or to interpret evidence or use the article to act as apologists for Warren.  She made the claims, for several years, it became the topic of a campaign in Massachusetts and later was discussed nationwide. It is notable so it should be in the article.  Editors need to stop saying, incorrectly, that it was a one time thing and that was merely raised by political opponents because the Cherokees that have raised questions and complained did not do it for political reasons.  To push forward the premise that: (1) it was a one-time claim or (2) only political opponents cared about Warren's claims is old-fashioned POV pushing.