" 

 :Next chance I get I will reorganize the numbers.  I already have gone through a few drafts to get them right.  The reason you stated is actually why I began it.  While it may not be law, we can at least state that WP:SBS guidelines IV:iii states that ...  I thought it may work better to keep our project in line across wikipedia.  I did remove the abbreviation link because I figured that doing that requires typing the entire date anyway and it may cause some ambiguity in the late BCs and early ADs if people do not remember to designate which is which, etc.  I also though that two extra digits usually do not make a succession box look any fatter, and with the proposal to make the templates wider on the table, I figure it may become a dead issue anyway. 

 :Lets hold off on adding anything about lines of succession and precedence.  The main talk page actually just brought up an issue with the latter one of those.  We obviously need to bring up both issues, but I don't think they are critical at the moment.  Perhaps putting a little extra section on other types of succession boxes, however, would help.  On a similar note, I added a table of contents to other pages on the mainspace; you like?  It includes a link to an official version of that cleanup page I made, minus most of the conflicts...those are all reincluded into the titles section now (which I will now be renaming headers to remain consistent).– (  •  ) "