: TL;DR. Two words: ARTICLE TALK. Revert to an earlier version before the bias you see, then. My points stand. My talk page isn't the place for this sort of, excuse me, but argumentative, wikilawyering blather. I worked on it, and found several RS, and it sure as fuck wasn't "Journatic's PR material, retyped". Of course something else may have happened to them, but your pointy casebuilding is considerably worse. Continue this on ARTICLE TALK, not here. What is it with people, that they just can't stand to discuss article improvements on ARTICLE TALK? Jesus fucking christ on a stick.