* Several points. First, you added several times here in the notes of the main article [1] the following sentence  [b]"Original article title unknown. Apparent copy of...not available on Web. ".[/b] Yet, this kind of sentence appears anywhere in the notes on other pages about post-punk acts and this is annoying to read. Two, you submit an idea in this discussion with the words "I'd like to do some trimming if not total removal of these excerpts, but perhaps the editors here find them useful for some reason." So you ask other points of view before to start... but you have already made some changes ?! Three, if you want to withdraw or erase any content, I'm afraid we're gonna have a huge arguement as most of it comes from me. Four, at the opposite, of course, you can add historical facts if it's sourced, especially if you've got acknowledges about the history of this band... Five, these notes exist as they are since a lot of time. A lot of people find them relevant as no one undid them or ever said anything about them. And to finish, you never contributed to this page before but you wrote yesterday that you're a reader/friend of Ericorbit's talk page. Thank you for this information.  20 may 2010 17:23