:Thank you for your incisive and subtle rebuttal. If I may address the major thrust of your argument in defense of this article (my motives), this is by no means part of some strategy to improve your article, though it came to my attention there. This is, in fact, the main game here, and your article is swept up in it. Here we have a page styled for years as a disambiguation page, when it is not, claiming that pseudoscience, etc are forms of pseudoscholarship, when they appear not to be. Dab's understanding of the term, the understanding that has prevailed over Wikipedia discussion for several years now, may be fair, or it may not, but until I see a dictionary definition supporting that use, we should stick to the sources we have.