:: What I see is that the article at the moment has almost no info on the architecture of the church and has info on the history with I believe some omissions (see above); instead it has a lot of info about disputes which is not very well sourced. If we want to keep disputes in the article, we need to have both Georgian and Armenian sources, otherwise it is clear POV. For architecture and history, I do not particularly care, be it Armenian, Georgian, Russian (quite possible that they exist, I need to search for them), French or Paraguayan sources, but at the time, they are just not in the article.