:::::::::::::This isn't Homosexuality and psychological research!  Just because one person breaks down research for a book on Gay and Lesbian Studies (not even Homosexual Studies) doesn't mean we can't add anything besides what that guy wrote.  I don't even understand what you mean I have to prove that psychotherapy has to do with psychology.  I need a source to say that psychotherapy has to do with psychology because our friend Standfort didn't happen to list it?  You set stupid rules are expect everyone to play by them.  If the lead doesn't accurately describe the content it is the lead that needs to be changed, not the content.  But fine, here we are playing by your stupid rules.  Our all-knowing Standfort who can do no wrong said very clearly that one of the areas of research (why it has to be research I'm not exactly sure, but that is the game we are playing) falls under the category of "What determines successful adaptation to rejecting social climates in gays and lesbians?"  Well, the report says that "Erzen (2006), Ponticelli (1999), and Wolkomir (2001) described these religiously-oriented ex-gay groups as a refuge for those who were excluded both from conservative churches and from their families, because of their same-sex sexual attractions, and from gay organizations and social networks, because of their conservative religious beliefs."  and that "such groups built hope, recovery"  Therefore, ex-gay groups help these people adapt to rejecting social climates.  Ex-gay groups, being of course, listed under SOCE groups. Therefore, the section you deleted on SOCE is a way in which homosexual people deal with rejecting social climate, much in the way that LGB support groups work, and should be put back in.