Oh my God, more 'periods' and the odd swear word.  If someone is a philosopher one would expect to find him or her in the major dictionaries and encyclopaedias on the subject.  Its a bit like pseudo-science articles.  If a few sources say its objective but the majority of sources simply ignore it then we take the weight of sources into account.  We also have sources which reject or qualify the word.  You seem to be assuming that one position (that she is) should be in lede despite the fact that the designation is controversial.  I think that puts you onto one side of the 'usual collection'