:I agree partially, but I do not think it is a very good summary of what is going on at LGAT. The absence of a difference between nominal subject and the subject actually discussed is a major dissimilarity between a coatrack and LGAT. The article is indeed unbalanced, but I do not think that was the intention of the editors (including me). Rather, no reliable source has been bothered to write about LGAT outside a circle of psychologists. We must assume then, that those psychological articles are all that there is to the subject. I have frequently searched the web for other information, but never found anything. Therefore, the bias is present, but there is no fact picking going on. 

 Because of the zeal (Mistranslation from Dutch - you know what I mean. Search an online Dutch-English dictionary for "Geestdrift" for a more neutral word) of some editors involved, I have been convinced that there is more to the subject. However, there is nothing more that can be written on Wikipedia, because of the lack of sources. 

 I might respond more lengthy later, but I am busy writing some other things and nominating WP:CB for deletion.