==Condé Nast Rehash== 

 Copying from wp:blp/n: 

 The article was just semi-protected by .  Unfortunately,  decided to reinsert the material anyway, with an edit summary that included: "add link to article on source so readers can gauge import."  The simple fact we're including it adds credence to the "import" of the source.  I think wp:blp is clear: stick to the facts (and, perhaps, include notable opinion when it can be impeccably sourced and clearly named).  It's about as clear a poorly-sourced, controversial statement as you can get, and adding a link to it doesn't make it any better sourced or less controversial.  '''''' aka justen