::Thanks for the feedback.  The tool is not automated in any way.  It just makes suggestions that the user then checks as "yes" "no" or not sure.  I usually actually look at the linked page, unless it seems really straight-forward from it's title.  I do not consider my editing using the online lining tool to be "a gimmick".  [[MoS:L] does not provide extremely specific guidance on what to link and what not to link, so I guess it is really a matter of preference (read: opinion)as to whether certain links meet the criteria of "relevant to the article" and "that a reader would want to follow".  I certainly believe that after my edits the article was better off, and that it had less than 10% of its words linked.  I understand you disagree with some of the added links.  Feel free to revert them.  As to the specific link for James Lewis, you are correct about that one being inappropriate.  Perhaps a review of my contributions will show you that I do more good than harm, and the few errors which do occur are easily corrected when pointed-out.  Thanks,