For the first, the fact that Darwin wanted his theory to be compatible with a Deistic belief is wholly left out of the article. As for the second, while the partial statement is summarized accurately, it ignores the context and paints a completely reverted picture of what the paragraph intends: 
 I cannot anyhow be contented to view this wonderful universe & especially the nature of man, & to conclude that everything is the result of brute force. I am inclined to look at everything as resulting from designed laws, with the details, whether good or bad, left to the working out of what we may call chance 
 :Ie. God>Natural Selection>Evolution. If Darwin indeed eventually became agnostic, so be it, but I feel that using sections of text out of context is bad. As for fixing it, I say dump the comments entirely. 

 :This took me a while to respond to as I haven't been wikipediaing much lately and forgot how it all works.