" 
 :The consensus is NOT to explain every move, and you know it. Everything is subjective. The reason I mentioned the chokeslam specifically is because i've seen that listed in multiple PPV articles (the long explanation). You mention traditional print encyclopedias, they contain jargon in their entries too. They assume a reader will have at least some knowledge of the subject. It's safe to assume that someone looking up a wrestling PPV article will at least know what basic moves like the DDT or piledrive is, explaining what they are is like a baseball article explaining what a home run or RBI is. If I were to look up a article on a cricket championship game (a sport I don't have a clue about how to play or the rules), I would not expect any terms to be explained. I could pick random FA's and would bet that most have little to no explanation of the jargon. I don't think it's out of the line briefly explain some of the more complicated or unique moves though.   "