:No one is hindering your "full and unimpeded participation" in the article, but changes to the article need to be based on sources, not unsupported opinions.    The article has not been "dumbed down" in any way.  The division of wireless power technology into "far field" and "near field" regimes, and the division of the latter into "inductive coupling" and "capacitive coupling" is thoroughly sourced in the article; for example  Sun and  Valchev.  There is no support in mainstream WP:RSs for an "Electrical conduction" or "Surface wave" section; they have been thoroughly discussed above on this page and have been rejected repeatedly by a consensus of editors.   The many, many previous times you have inserted these sections they had to be removed because they contained your pseudoscientific WP:FRINGE WP:OR theories.   

 :As I mentioned above, the source justification for inclusion of the "laser induced plasma channel" material in this article is marginal at best; it does not appear in mainstream wireless power texts, and none of the sources refer to it as a "wireless power" technology, only as a directed-energy weapon.  It might be better moved to other articles.  It certainly does not justify any change to the article's structure.