== Timewave zero == 

 Mike- 

 although you may consider it to be patent nonsense, (and it very well may be!), if its important to enough people its inclusion in wikipedia should be warranted.  it gets 14,000 hits on google, which isn't particularly significant, but its something.  people have been talking about it for over 30 years now.  check out the Novelty Theory page as the timewave zero page should probably become a redirect to that.  thanks.