" 
 == The Nolans == 

 Just saw the date correction for the name switch. Don't know if you saw my note re the copyright problem  might be good not to make changes until the non-violating version goes up (should be done by tomorrow). Will make sure the corrected date goes in of course.    

  
 Sorry 'bout that. Didn't see your note. I didn't mention it because I considered it such a minor alteration, but it's more accurate to say before 1980 than before 1979 as they were still The Nolan Sisters all the way through 1979 (in fact still so in early 1980) - as evidenced on their self-titled album. 
    
 
 Hey, no worries  the current version is a bit rambling re the changeover, but the way you've summed it up is dead right. I was more concerned that you might make other changes and that I'd miss them when producing the non-copyright version, which would be unfair both to you and the article.    
 OK, the new copyvio-free version has gone up, and I've explained what's changed on the article talk page. If you get the chance to read over it and can suggest other areas that need improvement, expansion or correction, that'd be great.    

 == Brotherhood of Man == 

 Hey Tuzapicabit.  Glad to hear you didn't think my review was to harsh!  Also glad to hear you've already started to work on the addressing some of my concerns.  The source of information is basically where the url come from.  So http://www.emusic.com/artist/1171/11711781.html is from EMusic.  That's what I meant.  Before you start fixing up the citations, however, I'd like to highly recommend using Citation templates, as they do all the formatting for you.  You just plug in the url, publisher, accessdate whatever and it does the rest for you.  They're a little tricky at first, but check out the code of a few other articles and should be pretty easy to figure out.  As for the birthdays and stuff, I brought that up because the article is supposed to be more about the band rather then the people.  When they were born doesn't really have much to do with the band.  Usually that stuff would be put into articles for each of the members themselves.  The fact that the members don't have articles as of yet is unfortunate, but the info still doesn't really apply here.  As for the discography, it's perfectly alright to have a discography page be pretty long.  Take a look at Nine Inch Nails discography, it's huge!  My point was that it's better to have super-specific info like that charts on a separate page rather than the band page.  Again, because the article is about the band, not necessarily all of their releases.  Let me know if you have any more questions.    

  

  

  

  

  

  
 ==Jay Aston== 
 With regard to this, ""What on earth have you done to this page? I was in the middle of expanding/rewriting it as well as adding a picture and not only have you changed it - you've knocked off the second half of the page - including ALL the references."" What on earth have I done? Firstly I haven't changed anything other than remove spaces in sources that I added, and I also expanded the infobox to the correct format.  I did nothing else to the page and have not changed anything. I previewed after my last edit and I can assure you that the second half of the page was not ""knocked off"" and nor were the references missing. If you check you will find that it was your last edit that ""knocked off the second half of the page including ALL the references"" when you missed off "">"" at the end of . Your was the last edit, and it was your last edit that removed all the content you believe I removed. I have therefore reverted your last edit to restore it then you can edit it to your hearts content and add the content back in again with the refs etc correct. All I did was remove the spaces from the sources (the sources which I had added some time ago) and amend/expand the infobox to the correct format. Have fun. When doing major edits and re-writes etc it helps to add the ""inuse"" tag on articles. That way other users will know to wait and know that yor are ""in the middle of expanding/rewriting"" it and leave it alone until you finish.·  

 And as you will now see as you have chosen to revert my