== Is this not the definition of disruptive editing? == 

 An editor repeatedly undertaking ignorant edits like this is not helping anyone. You are so dearly misinformed, as much as I've tried my best to help, you continue to ignore and you continue with the idiotic edits. Am i the only one seeing the complete and utter stupidity in this edit and others (obviously same editor)? A Copyright violation... what? Here is a brief excerpt from Wikipedia:Non-free content (yes, content which is NOT violating copyright): "Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea." The arrogance in this editor is blinding.  -