::That doesn't stop it from being plagiarism if too much is used and not in an open manner. As for Nanobear's comment, if one editor edits consistently in a biased way and is disruptive, they have to be commented on directly. They themselves has forced it to happen. 
 ::Moreover, the fact that we have seen a few new editors appearing in this section, who've never been here before, and ALL are decrying the bias in this article - shows that the article has a problem. Consensus is that this should be dealt with. So let's! ) Time for more criticism of Vozhd' Putin (though whether us part-timers can really counterbalance the full-time(, fully-paid?) minions of Putin I don't know...).