::::::::: First, it is "cross-sectional", not "cross-reference"; and both are allowed. 

 ::::::::: Very well I understand that (and wholeheartedly agree), but I also asked  

 ::::::::: Wikipedia does not state a requirement of a cross reference comparison 

 ::::::::: Second, your entire message above consists of refusal to get to point and a threat. The first step in a discussion is to acknowledge a problem, not denying it like a three-years-old. 

 ::::::::: Reporting to an administrator is a threat? Refusal to get the point? You've not responded to any of these problems   

 ::::::::: From what I understand WP:NOTSTATS does not say anything about comparison. It just says that independent sources should be referenced and rephrased ("explanations") such that it's clear. There's no term "comparison" or anything like that anywhere. 

 ::::::::: If you disagree, please quote the phrases which say so. 

 ::::::::: To which you responded   

 ::::::::: "Context", not "comparison". Please read carefully. 

 ::::::::: This does not answer the concern. I've asked this question a total of 3 times including this one   

 ::::::::: I don't understand why should I compare in the 1st place if all the sources talk about the same article. 

 ::::::::: To which you responded   

 ::::::::: No. I am not. But per WP:NOTSTATS, you are not allowed to fill the article with nonsensical numbers. 

 ::::::::: Which again does not answer the question Why should I compare? Does this not come into WP:IDONTHEAR? 

 ::::::::: Besides I already responded to that question before with   

 ::::::::: Context is the article. These numbers penetrate to IIS. 

 ::::::::: Your next concern. 

 ::::::::: You are even lying to myself about what I said! (Very pointless.) 

 ::::::::: Where? Can you please quote? 

 ::::::::: Yet after all this, if you refuse to engage in this discussion, I'll have to again add the edits with more stats from different providers in separate paragraphs, which's perfectly fair.