::::You are breaking one wikipedia policy after another here. The first being civility, the second being assuming good faith. Third being representing sources correctly. I obviously reject your bold proposal as in the diff as the "quotefarm" was at least factually correct as opposed to your proposal. Why there are several source falsifications you can read on my talk where I thoroughly analyzed the sources. I am not going to copy paste them here, least I be again accused of wallsoftext. Still, I think we can work together in a civil manner on this article and I have already started reducing the "quotefarm" without removing the very important contents of the sources. We can go point by point. I suggest we start with something not too controversial as a start.