Please read this carefully. I've tried to say it before. Calling other contributors' behaviour stupid is not acceptable here. Nor is it constructive in any discussion. 
 
 ::The paragraph on the Newspoll in the Australian Flag page is very similar to the one now in this article. That's probably why is hasn't attracted criticism. It contains no subjective conclusions. That was my concern with your original wording here. As well as presenting the poll results, you drew the conclusion about it being a fringe discussion. That bit's your personal opinion, an interpretation, not a concrete fact, and bound to attract criticism. The Wikipedia approach is to present facts and let readers draw their own conclusions, such as whether the debate is fringe or not, or whether the poll was a reasonable one.