::::::: Yeah, because there was no discussion for quite some time. I had closed the issue then, however you reverted it, restarting the issue. This led me to ask for help, which led to more votes and the suggestion to archive it. The article never lost in "quality", it only became more neutral. However, it still amazes me that either you can't read or you can't understand this fact, after I wrote it several times already. I never canvassed, and never asked for support. You can keep bringing that blame up and accuse stupid arguments such as "cheating" to cover your loss, but I won't address it anymore. You know I didn't canvass nor ask for support, you just using that as a cover up for the article's conversion to neutrality.