" 

 ==Civility== 
 Hail, O Mighty Administrator!  Would you mind pointing out to  that civility should be observed on talk pages, even on one of Wikipedia's most contentious topics?  Please see history/Mormonism discussion page, revision as of 10:57, 4 August 2008.  I don't think this editor is likely to pay attention to one of us ""non-Christians.""  Thank you.      
 :He has already been warned by , and has not returned to the article since. Perhaps it is best to let sleeping dogs lie.     
 ::Risker - Although ""non-Christian"" Wikipedians such as myself don't often talk about our church affiliation, Bytebear (an administrator) is almost certainly a (gasp) ""Mormon"" and therefore not likly to be trusted by this user.  A warning from an experienced administrator like the Mighty One, one not involved in LDS related articles, might help him view his action as a Wikipedia problem rather than a ""Mormon"" one.  Thanks for your opinion, however.     
 :::'Zilla effortfully reading Mormonism talkpage. Long page! All written in Wikipedia Verbose Verb Creole! ['Zilla starting to get jaundiced about this admin lark.] Maybe little 'shonen...?  ' . 
 ::::Oh, no you don't, dino. You stole my tools, you use them. Who would *I* scare, anyway?  |  . 
 :::::Maybe Little Stupid..? W please come back if user resume incivility, Bishapod go scare them!  ' . 
 ::::::Oh, no you don't, big scary mommy! Who little poddie scare?  ' . 

 :::::::[Undignified scramble for the door to get out of doing a job of work. ] Bye bye, W! Later!   ' .  ' . 

 ==Gisella Anastasia== 
 Review needed - too quick no warning and somewhat against what I thought were adequate utilisation of sources for notabiliity in two languages -   
 :Take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review and argue for it there, then. You're not supposed to simply re-create a page which has already been speedy deleted, as this one was on July 25. That's why I re-deleted it without warning—that, and the absence of any claim of notability. Thank you.  ' . 

 If you can delete so quick perhaps you could respond as quickly as well   
 :: Ah, yes, rudeness is the way to get admins to favour your case, no doubt of that. I'm sorry I took the time and trouble to write you a full message.  '''' . 

 It was with some suprise that the speedy happened that I responded to like that - it was not in any way intended to be rude - I have no case as I am not interested in pursuing this any further, and admins are the last thing on my mind for a start - this is simply a afterthought on what I will not try in future  - if there was a hint of warning I would not have in t