Yes it is all semantics. You seem to think that I've not understood your point, but I did straight away. Whether you accept my counter I don't know. You say I was insulting, but I could say you're insulting people's intelligence. These things work both ways. And I will never understand why a clearly false claim of 109 is acceptable, but a highly credible claim of 110 is not. When I first came to this page I tried to accomodate other people's edits as much as I could. Perhaps you felt you were doing the same, but I think you've ceased to. 

 Your 1st proposal of removing content isn't a solution. By that reasoning I should just remove pages I don't like. So your 2nd is much better. Presumably you chose the easier option. My easy option was to simply remove the word 'verified'. But you reverted it. So why shouldn't I revert your changes? However fair your objection to the page, in over a year, no-one has complained about it causing confusion except you. And the 4 cases weren't breaking Wiki rules, at least once 'verified' was removed. I was fine with that. So the burden of consensus is on you. You've provided a solution that keeps both of us happy. So again I say, build (instead of removing) it for your own sake, not mine. Don't have me do your work for you.