::::I agree nintendo.com is probably wrong, but I still think nintendo.com's information should be briefly mentioned in the article's text because most people will consider it to be a reliable source.  We can explain why this specific information is likely wrong (that nintendo.co.jp is to be considered more authoritative, that all other sites disagree with it, etc.), we can put it in tiny text at the bottom referenced by an asterisk. But in the end, I don't think it is for us to say that nintendo.com isn't often a reliable source.