I agree. This is fucking ridiculous. You're not including a man's fucking birthday because you can't reach a talk page consensus between two dates? A YEARS LONG EDIT WAR BECAUSE YOU CAN'T REACH A FUCKING CONSENSUS BETWEEN TWO DATES? And you leave the page blank without either date, as if the man was never born. Are you so stuck up in your rules you'd rather the article has no information rather than the two possibilities, which have a startling 2 year difference? Or a dramatic alternative, one date with the other included in a note as a possible conflict.  

 Otherwise, congratulations, you're doing a great job of committing exactly the kind of behaviour that prevents normal people from ever wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Who the fuck wants to argue with you for 2 years about a single date. For the sake of wikipedia, contribute your time elsewhere, so a more sensible batch of editors can come to a sensible consensus and actually improve the article. Your omniscient presence and opinion is not required.