::::I am hoping other editors will eventually contribute to this discussion.  Before that happens, I contend you are making this more complicated than it has to be.  Is Scott Green notable enough to take over the Scott Green article title?  If so, I'll revise my proposal, and propose we move his article to Scott Green.  If not, we have two obvious alternatives: (1) use a version of his name that he himself uses in his also public role as a lobbyist, or use Scott Green (American football official), an artificial construct that is often necessary on Wikipedia in similar situations. In this case, we have a workable alternative that the subject himself prefers and one that corresponds with his lower-profile-but-still-public role as a lobbyist.    .