==Arbitration Committee clarification== 

 This is to officially notify you of the Arbitration Committee's clarification of their decision in your case. Any Ashlee Simpson-related material is in fact covered by it. The text below is copied from WP:RFAr -   

 ====Revert limitation==== 
 2.2) For a period of one year, Everyking is prohibited from reverting articles relating to Ashlee Simpson except in cases of clear and obvious vandalism (as per definition at Wikipedia:Vandalism), with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule. What constitutes a revert shall be left up to adminstrators' discretion. 

 See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Everyking/Proposed_decision#Revert_limitation_2 for the alternative proposals which were considered and votes on them. 

 ====Response by arbitrators==== 
 * It is my opinion that any article which contains a link to Ashlee Simpson or mentioning Ashlee Simpson, see (what links to Ashlee Simpson) is an article "relating to Ashlee Simpson"; therefore falling within the articles covered by the revert limitation, if Everyking is editing with respect to that portion of an article which is concerned with Ashlee Simpson and in the opinion of an administrator reverting the article.   
 * If Ashlee Simpson-related material is put into an article, it is to that extent related to Ashlee Simpson. That's the standard a rough consensus (with some queries) of the admins applied to CheeseDreams and Jesus/Christianity-related material -   
 * We should not narrowly define "related to Ashlee Simpson," and it should be broadly interpreted by administrators.  Everyking should be made nervous about getting anywhere near anything that could be considered Ashlee-related.  The intent is to restrict him, not give him a change to win the game.   
 **That's precisely my thinking. This is an attempt to game the spirit of the ruling with an interpretation that I would think was beyond reasonable doubt -   
 * I agree with David's, Epopts, and Fred's intrepretations, although I think Fred's explanation is the most clear.   
 * The intent of the ruling, in my view, is to prevent the overzealous reversion of material relating to Ashlee Simpson. Administrators should be capable of determining when such an action is taking place and act appropriately.    20:05, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC) 
 *I concur with the above comments.