== Reply re Tony Blair article == 

 That's not true. I have on two occasions on the talk page, when asked, specifically stated what improvements should be made. 

 It is impossible to regard the article as it stands as being neutral when the introduction makes no mention of the Iraq War-Lying-Hutton Report affair which defined his premiership and led to his eventual downfall. 

 I think the heated talk page discussions of the past fortnight show that some people believe the article is not neutral. 

 Fundamentally it writes about Blair very positively - and minimises criticism. For example, all corruption allegations were removed about a week ago.