::: Decausa, your arguments are completely unfounded. You removed an article that described Mecca's cultural richness with an article that had journalist POV against the Saudi government. When I replaced the original article, putting it side by side your POV article, you reverted my edit with a phony claim on the talk page that somehow my restoration of the article violated some nebulous Wikipedia policy. You go around blaming everyone of violating Wikipedia policies, with flimsy and incorrect misinterpretations, while actively inserting your POV and removing reliable sources. From your talk page, other editors have also noticed the same thing.