:::Lot's of fringe viewpoints get RS coverage.  We don't need to cover all of them.  If we weigh the relative coverage of positive and negative, we would need a thousand pages of positive reviews to the one press release by ADC.  It's not notable enough or have enough weight to carry in the American Sniper film article just as it was enough weight to include it in the ground zero mosque article.  You are giving them way to much credit as the RS covered the press release but did not endorse or validate its content.  You want to include the content which was not backed by reliable sources at all.  ADC is a notable organization but they are not a reliable source.    
 ::::WP:DUE states that a viewpoint's prevalence is based on reliable sources. If sources like The Guardian and The Washington Post report about the statement and related details, that means it has prevalence worth covering, even in passing. Is there an aspect of WP:NPOV that warrants excluding anything about the statement and related details?   |  (ping me)