Wikipedia is not a soapbox for anyone to stand on  it is an attempt to catalogue knowledge.  WP:NPOV  is not a blunt instrument you can use to wedge POV sources or information into articles, via references or external links.  As far as RonCram  I only just ran into him on another article a few days ago, and here.  His behavior  including false claims of personal attacks, and repeated POV pushing in multiple articles  has caused me to no longer assume good faith regarding his edits or his agenda.  I found this article quite by accident and noted (above) my question regarding its purpose and its POV (note on both sides).  I do not have the time to argue back and forth with editors with an agenda  I will gladly participate in any RfC's or straw polls on this topic, but I won't give validation to those who game the system or wikilawyer. /