"""I don't think so. "" - 
 Well, this is not a matter of what you think, but rather what the facts are and what concrete evidence you can bring to support it. This is a matter of presenting concrete facts in a way that they are not misleading. Instead, you are using wiki space to promote your personal opinions and believes, which may or may not be accurate.  

 ""Eurasianet has consistently provided accurate articles throughout the election campaign in Armenia."" 

 1. Eurasianet is simply not the best expert in the field of local Armenian politics. This is like asking expert opinion on Molecular Physics from an Orthopedist (both are respected professions that require education and knowledge, yet an expert on one is not necessarily going to know the other). 

 2. Eurasianet did not provide any source of the poll numbers they received. Furthermore, no third party has confirmed that their polling was conducted accurately. This does not mean that they are necessarily inaccurate, but considering the controversy and conflicting results from other polls, it seems counterproductive and disbalanced that you would reference only one source, without any evidence, other than your own claim that they are accurate. 

 3. It seems like the you consider accurate only those sources, that correspond to your personal opinion on the matter. Simply stating that Eurasianet is accurate (and implying that other sources are not) does not make it more and other sources less accurate or reliable. It only creates disbalanced and misleading picture, which you refuse to support by any evidence other than your own claim. 

 ""Your opinion on British Populus won't stop from their survey being listed here."" 
 1. You can simply do a search on google to see that British Populus was mixed in and several dozens controversies. This is not a matter of my opinion (which I have not even voiced on this matter). It is a matter of presenting balanced information on this issue, and using controversial poll agency like British Populus as your only source is hardly the best way to go about it. 
 2. I was not suggesting removing them; but if you are going to quite them (which is fine) then you also need to quote other polls that had different numbers. 

 ""BTW, their ""31 percent"" of voters supporting HHk is on the HIGH side, so I don't know why you are complaining!)"" 

 1. Numbers do not matter (as well as subjective opinions). It is the principle of presenting accurate and balanced information. By the way, I am not even a fan of the party, never even voted for them.  
 2. I am not complaining; I am merely point out inaccuracies in this article. 

 ""If you have better sources, then why not help Wikipedia out by doing some work instead of making suggestions to others?"" 

 Your suggestions to work, while you do not even know me or what I do, combined with your claims that I'm complaining, are rather rude and are aimed at attacking me as a person. I would prefer keeping this discussion about the topic itself, no need to get personal. I hope you understand that personal attacks are not the best way to have a civilized discussion. 
    

 "