My suggestion would be the following organization.  

 *AA History  
 **AA's understanding of alcoholism 
 **The Twelve Traditions  
 *The AA program 
 *Effectiveness  
 *Criticism and controversy 
 *See also 
 *External links 
 *References  

 So, I would show AA's understanding/definition of alcoholism as part of the development of the organization. As I would also do with the Twelve Traditions  solutions members came up with to help sustain the administration. I think "The AA program" is a little less pov than "How the AA program works." Effectiveness would contain the results of research on AA, both good and bad. A good criticism and controversy keep unnecessary emotional outbursts from being inserted in other places in the article.  I think most AA-critics just want to know that they're being heard.  Other ones want to change each AA-related article on Wikipedia in to an AA-critical promotion for Rational Recovery. The first kind we can accommodate, the later we will need to continue to report to administrators. See also, External links, and References are okay the way they are, although I think the references could be reformatted to be proper citations, I tried to do that in the EA article. —