I can understand not trusting me, but I would suggest that not communicating on that basis is irrational (as it was for the US and USSR during the cold war  see Moscow–Washington hotline). For not communicating to make sense, I would have to not only be untrustworthy, but also I would also have to be clever enough (or you stupid enough) to somehow cause you harm through ASCII text and to do so in such a way that nobody else caught on. I am not asking you to trust me, just to communicate. I simply do not see how dialog can harm you or how refusing to have a dialog can benefit you. 

 I might add that I was not professing concern for your legacy. I was making an appeal to your self-interest in an attempt to persuade you to change your behavior. Is there anything   anything at all  that has been said on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski that might some day cause you to make even a tiny change in your behavior? How can it possibly be true that all the people who have commented on that page are wrong?