:::::::::Did I say I was concerned? You said "there's no good reason to shorten the regular timeline". Since you don't seem to understand how RFCs work, I was simply pointing you to some resource that (a) explained how we're supposed to do things around here, and (b) a page that explains how things are generally done. We aren't obligated the close the RFC (despite no support for the proposal) but normally by this point in time, we normally would.The things is, at this point, it's very clear that you are uninterested in working with other editors. When no one agreed with you, you threw up the RFC. When no one supports your position in the RFC, you want it to stay open a month. You're abusing process. But do carry on.