" 
 == GA nomination on Hold == 

 *Well-written: Passed. However, dead links do not look good and thus should be removed. Baby clothes, although arguably an article that needs to be created, isn't entirely relevant to this article. She has a clothing line that includes some baby clothes, but that's the extent of it. 
 *Factually acurate: Failed. The article as a whole is well referenced, for the most part. There are some instances where an unreferenced statement is made (i.e. Stefani beginning a long distance relationship with Rossdale), but not referenced until it is mentioned again later in the article. Additionally, the lead section does not cite any sources until the last paragraph. WP:LEAD states that the lead should be carefully sourced.  
 *Broad coverage: Passed. 
 *Neutral point of view: Passed. 
 *Stability: Passed. 
 *Images: Passed. Although, personally, I think there are a couple too many, and the main image should be more of a head shot. Regardless, by GA criteria, it passes. 

 There really isn't that much to be done, so I think GA status should be achieved within the week. Therefore, the hold will be in place for no more than seven days unless progress is being made and there is a reasonable request for an extention. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a  GA review. Thank you for your work so far. /  

 Comment: The Lead in an article is never referenced, because it is a summary of the whole article. Everything in the Lead should be mirrored in the article and references provided in the article.  
 :The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, summarizing the most important points, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and briefly describing its notable controversies, if there are any. Many users read only the lead, so it should be self-contained and cover the main points. It should not ""tease"" the reader by hinting at important information that will appear later in the article. It should be between one and four paragraphs long, should be carefully sourced as appropriate, and should be written in a clear and accessible style so that the reader is encouraged to read the rest of the article.  
 :Articles to refer to for reference:  
 :*Angelina Jolie - Current Featured Article 
 :*Madonna (entertainer) - Former Featured Article 
 :*Michael Jackson - Current Good Article  
 :/  
 ::This issue came up when Jihad (song) went for GA status.  There was a consensus at its review that references in the lead are only necessary when they are not present in the main article.    
 ::: is right - the lead section is meant to be a summary of the article, and therefore all information in the lead section should be in the body. As long as it's cited in the body of the article it's fine - citing the same information twice is redundant. Check  Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 16 where in a Good Article review of ""Jihad (song)"" the consensus was the lead doesn't need citing. If this is the only basis for placing this GAC on hold, I'd recommend Shadowhalo go to Good Article Review as I did.   
 ::::It's not the only basis for placing it on hold, as noted above. It was one example. Thanks for your info, but I only need it from one person. /  

 :::ShadowHalo, considering your reference to Jihad (song), I now realize that the current format for citations is acceptable. Move forward with citing references for t