I was under the impression that Wikipedia was a source of information that stated facts and that it was not supposed to show bias. 

 I have repeatedly tried to write down information that is factual, each time having it removed, the latest time because the training agency in question does not come under established bodies names such as WRSTC  which is completely irreverent as it has no LEGAL status as a body as there are no laws in statute related to scuba diving, it is completely self policed. 

 Does the person who cancelled the information believe that scuba training agencies are only genuine if they come under the WRSTC banner? if so they are completely wrong. To be a scuba training agency you must be approved by the government which controls the country you are registered in. 

 Microdive was formed in 2003 
 Microdive is a fully approved scuba certification agency and fully approved by the UK government 
 Microdive appears on the UK governments list of approved scuba training agencies. 
 Microdive provide consumers with a 5 and 9 mtr scuba certification courses and is the only agency in the world to offer them 
 Microdive is the only agency to allow other agencies instructors to teach its courses. 

 The bottom line here is that if you contact the UK governments Health and safety executive, the only body that actually means anything here they will confirm the above 5 points. 

 Can someone please tell me why Microdives 5 and 9 mtr courses can not be listed on Wikipedia if the UK government has sanctioned them as being valid and fully approved? 

 Please let me know why this is or how I am supposed to list the information so that it meets Wikipedia standards? 

 THank you. R Hart.