" 
 :::Well you are absolutely right on one thing, original research should not go in the article.  That means that even if we were all to agree that your counterexample was valid, without a reliable source it cannot go in the article.  That has nothing to do with how notable you are, (or not), and my apologies for the sarcastic comment on those lines above.  If there is no source to discuss, then this thread is in danger of breaking another rule (the one about not using talk pages as forums) and I suggest asking a question at the Reference Desk instead, or if you want to harass me in particular, on my talk page.  But at the risk of breaking the rule myself, you have gone wrong at line 4.  "