:When I came to Wikipedia last year, I quickly learned that Wikipedia is a numbers game and if you are an editor editing India related articles, you are screwed even if you are right. This is especially true in areas of Indo-British history. Just like Yogesh, I've had my arguments with Redtigerxyz but there may be times when it is best to keep those issues aside and focus on what is best for India related articles. For example, if we had the support of Redtiger on Ganga, our position would have been stronger. Later even Redtiger had to deal with some of the same nonsense on that page with the usual editors. If there's no collaboration, you will continue to have problems like an article called Ganges instead of Ganga or a featured article on India which gives more weight to the British East India Company and doesn't even mention the Mauryas or Guptas, etc in the lead.