Ian, with all due respects to you sir, you put the following statement at the very bottom of your article (the second to last paragraph to be exact): 

 "In September 2014, Ringo Starr, a member of the Beatles, said that he was disgusted that the militant cell were given nicknames derived from members of the band. Speaking to the London Evening Standard, he said "It’s bullshit. What they are doing out there is against everything the Beatles stood for."[64] 

 So you see sir, that at least one surviving member of the Beatles has gone on public record to strenuously object to the comparison of what the Beatles stood for when compared to what this individual stands for. 

 The disputable statement is way at the top of the article, the protest by Ringo Starr is way at the bottom of the article. Maybe if you could at least put his protest in line with, before, or blend it in with, or at least put it in the same paragraph with the objectionable or questionable content it would help on the NPOV of the article. 

 Thank you for the article. There are other parts of the article that I think may need to be edited (which I will raise when I get a chance).