" 
 : You need to list everybody who was involved in the dispute. So list everyone who opined on the disputed material in the talk page RFC, or who was involved with editing in/out the disputed material, or who otherwise challenged the edits that are being disputed. If an editor only opined in the RFC as a third (neutral) party, they don't need to be listed, but they do if their comments constituted an explicit support or opposition of one or another opinion on the dispute. If there is doubt over whether a given editor is an involved party, just list them - and if they object, we can undertake a more detailed evaluation. Does that clarify things?  [] "