Hi David, 
 :I apologize for any frustration I have caused you. Looking back through my talk page history, I see your note back in August explaining how to perform a local upload; I should have remembered. I try to put up images on the TFA blurbs before the blurbs go up on the main page so that the images can be discussed beforehand, but I do not always catch the blurbs in time. I have not uploaded any images that I believed at the time to be off-topic, but I will attempt to keep them more centrally on topic in the future. I think TFA images to be a valuable part of Wikipedia, which is why I often edit in this area. I hope my TFA blurb edits will be more agreeable to you in the future. 
 :   

 ::Thanks for taking my concerns seriously.  I agree that TFA images are valuable.  I've added some myself, and I frequently modify them to enhance their display.  Likewise, you've done some good work in this area. 
 ::But having no TFA image is vastly preferable to having one with little relevance to the article's subject.  In this instance, the article was about a 2005 computer-animated film, not an 1843 book.  Both works are based (to varying extents) on the story of Little Red Riding Hood, but their visual styles are vastly dissimilar.  —  

 :PS - I have added images to several of the TFA blurbs scheduled for the next few days. Do I need to perform a local upload or does that happen automatically if the image is placed on the blurb before it goes up on the main page? I would be grateful if you would let me know if any of the images I have uploaded for the currently scheduled blurbs are insufficiently related to the subject of the corresponding articles.    

 ::If an image is added far enough in advance (12 hours is a fairly safe cutoff), it should be protected by a bot before it reaches the main page.  But this isn't foolproof, as pre-main page vandalism could go unnoticed, and the bot occasionally malfunctions and fails to perform the protection.  So locally uploading main page images always is a good idea. 
 ::Today's image was unsuitable, as it isn't actually from the game series.  It was created to serve as a similar symbol that fans could use to identify themselves. 
 ::The November 23 image seems acceptable.  Its illustrative value is modest (as it relates to a minor element of the subject), but I see no glaring problems.  —