:::Heh. These treaties are always in flux. Respectfully, your emphasis may be a little off, here. These matters move very slowly, but they do move.  I would rather not gum recognition facts up by attempting to, 1) summarize a present case snapshot of the recognition map, nor to, 2) legitimatize a partial step toward full recognition as anything other than a tepid mid-way point.  You've heard of jurisdictions that "recognize but don't offer intervisitation," correct?  Really - How silly is that, eh? It's a stop on the way to full recognition, that's all. Now, I grant that this may be more of a problem of structure and syntax, versus legalism.  If so, by all means, make use of sub-networks, but I think we can provide as much clarity by leaving matters of specific recognition to the GLs themselves, while we paint with a broader brush. Mainstream, PHA, Canadian conference and Mexican conference GLs should all be listed in the mainstream list.  That's how almost four fifths of the US jurisdictions see it. The rest is detail that may be found in the Pantagraph, or from a specific grand lodge.