Whenever I see flagrantly false claims about me bandied around, I wonder if the people making them are being malicious or simply stupid.  When the same people make false claims over and over again, the stupidity required is implausible, and therefore I have to assume dishonesty.  PhilKnight falsely and repeatedly claimed, a while ago, that I had been banned.  He then tried to get me banned to retrospectively justify his false claim.  Having failed with that, I see he maintains a grudge and a propensity to lie, finding a block from August 2013 and trying to imply that it was recently applied.  Is he too stupid to know what year it is?  I don't think so.  Is he throwing whatever mud he can at me in the hope that some of it sticks?  I think so. 

 And Bretonbanquet claims to have "no interest in stalking you, interacting with you or engaging with you on any level", which doesn't really square with his attempts to get me blocked, just a few inches up the page.  Is he too stupid to notice that he contradicts himself?  I don't think so.  Is he affecting exasperation in the hope of gaining some kind of sympathy from admins who might then take his side?  I think so. 

 And he further claims that I am "protected no matter what he does", and that "admins clearly don't care what you do".  Is he unaware of the attack page which lists in extensive detail how untrue that is?  I don't think so.  Is he once again trying to present himself as a victim by making stuff up?  I think so. 

 I assume you find this fun.  I hope that whatever fun it provides you is worth it.