The point is that in the article about filthy bestiality, there is an image which: 1) is not  at all art, but the porn of its time, 2) with a fake caption which can be easily translated as an attack against ancient Greek culture.  

 I don't care what was the intention of the person who created that trash a century ago. Because Avril was not artist and the image is not art! So, it is at least ridiculous to even imagine to compare it with Michelangelo's masterpieces. It is completely irrelevant Avril's intention, or the intention of those who created that caption much later (which is what I am supporting here).  

 The important point is that in that article, there is no other image which indicates the nationality of somebody who is having sexual contact with an animal. Like for example, "French is sodomizing a mule", or "Chinese is having sex with a chicken". But only "ancient Greek..."!!! Does it sound good? Does it serve a purpose of art, or philosophy, or science, or anything else which has a real value for humanity?  

 Moreover, since it was not me who changed again the caption of that ridiculous image, and it was not you..., there must be more sensible people around the block.  
 So, I convey my regards to them!  

 About the terms "Zoophilia" and "Zoophiles", you like it or not, are Greek. And Greek is an alive language which is spoken by some millions of people today.  

 Zoophiles are called the activists who fight for animals' rights in my country.  

 Wikipedia is an international online encyclopedia, and as such it has to include in its articles the origin of these terms, and also how the terms are used today by those millions of Greeks around the globe.