:Absolutely, Gary.  There's no need to please any editors.  However, Wikipedia works by discussion and consensus, and so, while tempting at times, we cannot simply declare that editors can be ignored (you have yourself asserted the importance of "listen[ing] to other editors opinions and concerns", I note).  Moreover, it is of course of vital importance to pay attention to and discuss appropriate policy.  Since you still haven't responded to my request that you explain where the fault lies with my undue weight analysis, may I assume that you're unable to do so?  
 :Mish, this section contains a version of the contested sentence (corrected so that it accurately represents what McAllister et al actually claim), plus material that I added in order to make the weight given to that source more appropriate.  I consider this section too long and too detailed for this article, though I am not altogether sure how best to cut it down.  As I thought I'd made clear above, my preference is not to cover cost-effectiveness in this article, but I am open-minded and happy to consider an addition, as long as it conforms to NPOV.