: Oh blody hell. If you have to resort to accusing editors of editing with a pro-Microsoft bias, instead of addressing the point, then you may kindly shut your fucking mouth. What's with this "not enough information" bullshit?  We have all the information we need. 

 : You've completely failed to address the simple proposition I've laid out here.  It's clear as a bell: MinWin is in Server 2008 (Mason); Windows 7 will have MinWin (Russinovich); Windows 7 is an evolution of Server 2008 (Sinofsky); and nobody at Microsoft has said Windows 7 doesn't contain the MinWin work.  Therefore Windows 7 still contains MinWin.  If you don't have any way of discrediting that, please, just lay off with the bullshit, and quit quoting people who don't even fucking know that the desktop version of Windows 2000 is called "Windows 2000 Professional", not "Windows 2000 Workstation".  You should be extremely suspicious of your own stance if you have to go to people like that to inform you of anything.  Don't trust them!  Just don't! 

 : If you really honestly believe that we need to write in an article about an operating system, about how some bloggers like Mary Jo Foley are boo-hoo-hoo confused about kernels, then you've lost the plot of what we're trying to accomplish on Wikipedia.  Stay focused on describing the topic.  Take an encyclopedic approach.  Use reliable sources.  Stick with verifiable claims.