A related issue is the recent change in that section from "understanding of evolution" to "theories of evolution", which I reverted.  Besides the latter being awkward in its context due a repetition of "theories", it's also wrong.  Before any theories get involved, there is the fact of evolution, which no scientific theory is allowed to ignore.  Even the most radical notions that just barely qualify as scientific, like panspermia, admit to evolution.  Where they disagree with the modern synthesis is in their claims about changes over longer periods of time, including the origins of life.  These claims, while likely false, are not trivially falsifiable, so there's still leeway.