**Allow me to butt in here... If someone writes "Don't vote for motherfucking Hillary because of the motherfucking snakes..." (or whatever it was) in an article, they invite the recitation of their own words as evidence against them.  Ulayiti's use was in keeping with reciprocity.  Furthermore, since "motherfucking" appeared in the article so many times, more than any other word, the article was, in a sense, literally a "motherfucking article" (that is, it seems to have been composed more for the use of that word than for any other purpose.)  To describe as a "motherfucking article" is thus, in this special circumstance, an objective comment on its content, and not a subjective attack. 

 **In sort, if one vandalizes WP with a new page called Astrofoo, the entire content of which is the word "motherfucking" repeated eighty times, one cannot be offended at the objective description of it as a "motherfucking article", for (as a matter of fact) that clearly describes accurately the purpose of the vandalism. Best wishes,   

 ==Great to see you back!!== 

 Your sanity, calmness, and fairness has been sorely missed! ) Best wishes,