: I reverted your changes because I thought there had been a consensus to refer to her as a "nude model."  I was mistaken.  Upon reading the archives of the talk page, I can see that no consensus was made and actually  who just reverted the IP users changes before I reverted your changes was actually arguing for her work to be referred to as pornography.  There is a difference between pornography and nude modeling is actually pretty distinct.  Pornography has the purpose of exciting the viewer sexually while modeling (including nude modeling) is not supposed to do this.  Sander's work was obviously created with the desire to excite the viewers sexually.  She wasn't posing in order to promote clothing or some other product.  As such, it clearly falls into the parameters of pornography.  To refer to her as a nude model is something of an injustice to those that actually take part in the profession.  She may not be a "porn queen" but her work obviously falls into the category of pornography.