comment  I have just read WP:LEADIMAGE and this states "Lead images should be selected to be of least shock value; if an alternative image exists that still is an accurate representation of the topic but without shock value, it should always be preferred."(my emphasis)  I think this means that of the 5 candidates above, D is clearly the only choice. However, as Anna points out, this is a guideline.  The WP:NOTCENSORED policy discusses images that might be "objectionable" and says "..."being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal (or inclusion) of content." (my emphasis).  I do not wish to go against policy, but I feel this might be one of those "generally" exceptions.  I have seen many images on animal-welfare related articles deleted because they are objectionable, and often agreed because they seem to have been selected for their high level of shock-value.  If we go down the route that not showing these types of images (in the lead) is censorship and therefore they should be allowed, we could end up with a real horror show on animal/meat related articles.  As a consequence of reading the guidelines and policy, I intend to change my vote.DrChrissy