" 

 ::You need to read WP:PA, WP:AGF, WP:BRD and WP:EW. All 3 address your comment in full. A change was proposed (which, if I recall correctly, removed reliably cited information from an article), and this change was reverted by another user. The next step is for someone to discuss it on the talk page. It's not my job to discuss the reasons new content shouldn't be in the article. It's the original editor's job to defend the content and establish consensus for its inclusion. If you'd like to do this yourself, you're of course more than welcome. But continuing to re-revert on the article (whether or not 3 times in a day) is edit warring and will result in administrative action. So please do go to the talk page first. All the best, (but seriously... read WP:PA) | "