November 2012 (UTC) 

 ::::::Sorry, I mixed up Revista Academica with the paper Erdely and Arguelles wrote about secrecy and sexual abuse. RS is indexed in Sociological Abstracts. Here is a book review of an other of Erdely's books in Cultic Studies Review, published by the International Cultic Studies Association, which says that RA is peer reviewed. It also notes that "Dr. Erdely is a member in good standing of the Latin American Association for the Study of Religions, the regional chapter of the International Association for the History of Religion (IAHR)." Peer review does not mean that the reviewers (who usually are anonymous) assume responsibility for the content. 
 ::::::From an academic point of view, wiretapping in no way impairs the credentials of a scholar, however illegal it is. The ethical aspects may be judged in different ways, depending on wether you have reason to think Joaquin is a dangerous person or not. 
 ::::::Inserting irrelevant keywords in order to boost Google searches is a very minor offense - and probably done by the webmaster, not by the editor. It seems that your ties to the church makes you loose perspective. 
 ::::::Bribing a physician doesn't require very much political power, nor does it imply corruption or incompetence on the part of the Mexican government. (Again, I make no claims, I merely consider various possibilities.) 
 ::::::Scientology is a dangerous cult and notorious liars.   19:30, 10