:Ok, looks like we are getting nowhere. First of all, there is documentation. Granted, it is not the best form, but it does corroborate the claim that there is a valid point of view. So, your excuse for deleting a valid POV is that "there is no documentation" when in fact there is. On the other hand, I do agree that serious changes are needed. I'll post my proposals here in the afternoon. Finally, I also have a life, but I also take responsibility for those things that I started. It is unfair that your stubborness and your POV edits ruined the wikipedia experience for other editors of the article who want to contribute. Lets finish what was started, and get it over with...