== FAC review == 

 To be honest, the review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/California State Route 67/archive1 has been one of the most unpleasant reviews that I have ever had in my 8 years of editing this site. I really wish that you would reconsider the tone you are taking with this review, as you've been unnecessarily snide, as seen with this edit summary. Moreover, it seems that you have become extremely condescending, which has become unbearable considering that I have already written three very similar articles (California State Route 78, California State Route 56, California State Route 52) and have had them pass FA. I have even considered withdrawing this nomination as it has become so unpleasant, even though your impending oppose will most likely be discounted by the FAC delegates anyway. 

 I welcome reviews from people who are not familiar with America, or roads, or American roads, or even the English language, but when someone not familiar with any of these tries to "call the shots" and force the nominator to make changes that do not benefit the article, that would make any subject expert want to leave this site very quickly. You've lucked out this time, since I'm pretty invested in this site and it would take a lot to get me to walk away, but you may not be so lucky with the next nominator you offend. I strongly suggest that you reconsider how you are approaching all reviewing - we are here to build an encyclopedia by consensus, not by shoving someone's aesthetic tastes down someone's throat. ''''''