::Number 57, your title was acceptable to me but there were objections, probably stemming from the fact that "terrorist" is explicitly singled out by WP:WTA); at any rate I don't think it offers any advantage over the current title.  Given that List of attacks on Israeli non-combatants in the Second Intifada is non-controversial and requires no case-by-case ethical interpretations on the part of Wikipedians, I think it's the shoe-in here.   

 ::The only argument that's been made against it is that it's a "POV fork," which seems to be false.  A pov-fork "is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts."  As I understand it, a POV-fork is kind of specially-designed play track for gimpy hobby-horses who didn't compete well in a general heat with normal, healthy equines.  WP:POVFORK gives two examples of this: in the first and most common, a new article is created under a synonymous title which should obviously be simply a redirect; in the second, a "Criticisms of ...X" or "Unanswered questions about...Y"-type article is created to evade WP:UNDUE or other issues of non-notability.  None of this has anything whatsoever to do with the creation of separate lists for Palestinian and Israeli civilian casualties.  There is no conceivable issue here of sneaking in non-notable material, or presenting material in a non-neutral light.  Those pushing against it are claiming that Israeli and Palestinian attacks are categorically different, yet simultaneously insisting that they must be dealt with in a single list, which doesn't make sense.