WHY is it vandalism? This STILL hasn't been explained to me, it just keeps being reverted without just cause. It PLAINLY doesn't belong in the article. Even if it did (and it definitely doesn't) it's in the WRONG SECTION. What the fuck is the matter with you people? Do you just perfunctorily revert any large redactions? Or do you just not like my attitude, so you'd rather leave a shit article shitty to "teach me a lesson". God you people are pitiful. It's obvious you didn't get smacked enough as kids and have to beg for sex. Hail Jimbo! Jerkoffs.