::::I see nothing at all wrong with saying something like "Dr. Doug Haldeman says that HA is conversion therapy..." and then from that point developing some of the implications of that assertion.  That's very different from what we have now, with the article stating as unequivocal fact that HA is conversion therapy in the opening sentence.  As to the current section on CT, if we are using sources that do not mention HA specifically, they are not relevant and they have to go.