::::::::::::::@WLU:  I'm still waiting for the quote that explicitly mentions paraphilic infantilism supporting As paraphilias tend to be secretive behaviour(sic), no meaningful prevalence data exists for infantilism.  I believe I've already clearly shown that not explicitly mentioning paraphilic infantilism was the reason you gave to remove almost all references to the DSM from this and related articles, even the sections that apply to all paraphilias, and that I have also clearly shown that the quote you tried to use does not apply to all paraphilias. 

 ::::::::::::::@WLU Re: infantilism (sexuality).  I notice that to prepare for this, you've already had to modify a citation in another article, as well as remove the text "'sexual infantilism' is also used medically as a synonym for delayed puberty"  (cited to Greenspan and Hickey) from this one.  Since I only added Hickey, it would seen that two of the three of us think that text is supportable. 

 ::::::::::::::@FiachraByrne: I respect that you initially set this aside as something to think about.  It is interesting, but has the potential to complicate conversations.  You might be right about the current reading (which I assume is WLUs?) not being right.  Most clearly, it mentions infantilism while F&B; used other terms.  As for myself, I tend to rely on Occams_razor in the absence of testability.  Etiologically, it is simpler to say that infantilists are infantilists for some unknown reason.  The alternative is to say that infantilists are first pedophiles for some unknown reason, and through a hypothetical transform which also occurs for some unknown reason, they become infantilists.