== Fed up and don't know what to do == 

 I'm completely fed up and I have no idea what to do anymore when it comes to .  I encountered him when he showed up at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol#Tag bombing new article within seconds of their creation complaining that 49 minutes after he created it, someone put these tags on it.  The discussion there goes round and round and finally got closed because it wasn't going to go anywhere (although I have no idea what AutomaticStrikeout was thinking when he suggested asking someone if they were still editing the page on their talk page).  Neotarf claimed translating work had been lost (in the article no less).  It was made abundantly clear to him at Talk:Carl Emil Pettersson why the tags where there, but he just doesn't get it.  I actually had the Swedish language book sent to my school so I could hopefully work with Neotarf (by scanning pages) to insert inline citations, .  I begin improving the article with some English language sources.  Adding one section about an upcoming movie based on Pettersson and using a source to add an inline citation to content previously written by Neotarf.  In what I'm assuming is an ownership issue, Neotarf removes my edits stating that he's removing counterfactual material.  I bring the issue to WP:RSN#Cineuropa where Neotarf begins claiming that the books don't exist, the movie doesn't exist, and the website in question doesn't have any editorial oversight, which, coming from him, is a bunch of bullocks.  He shows zero ability to collaborate, which is a huge issue of WP:CIR.  I picked an edit at random of his, not having time to go through all of his old edits, he's been here for over a year and he's still direct linking in text instead of referencing .  And when I mention WP:CIR, I don't in any way mean that he's "incompetent".  He speaks in a relatively intelligent manner, it's more of a WP:I didn't hear that type of an issue and a failure to collaborate.