==I have never, ever, seen a biased and untruthful article your article on the EDL. Here is why== 

 I have never seen such a biased and lying article which throws the Wikipedia’s claim of impartiality and truth out of the window. Here are the points. Possibly I missed some. 

 Intro:  
 1. Anonymous are a bunch of internet nerds so the EDL had no actual confrontation with them. 
 Formation: 
 2. Claims that the EDL is organised around figures in hooligan firms is just plain slander. 
 3.The Wikipedia site on the British Freedom Party has nothing about being affiliated in any way with the BNP. 
 4. The claims of a far left hate organisation like “Hope not Hate” are irrelevant. 
 Membership and support: 
  5. On the EDL forum, membership figures are given, at the top of the page. 
 6. A lying link to the BNP, a racist group that only allows whites claiming EDL is the same. 
 7. Lying claims of racism. The EDL is against muslims taking over Britain. Islam is a religion and you cannot be racist against a religion, so just hearsay lies 
 8. Trying to link them to a racist organisation like Stormfront is just a filthy, dirty, trick. 
 Activities: 
 9. Cost of policing EDL demonstration costs £1 million (Link 44). That is a few hundred policemen who presumably got £3,000 to £4,000 each for the hours spent there? 
 10. Journalists who covered marches received death threats? From who? UAF maybe? Any evidence they did? Normally such threats would be printed in newspapers, so lefty NUJ lies. We know such organisation fund the UAF who start the trouble off. Yellow journalism. 
 11. Parkinson claims a death threat but has no actual evidence it came from the EDL or anyone else. We know his newspaper is pro UAF and anti EDL. So just hearsay. 
 12. Four special national police units investigating the EDL? That was FOUR years ago, and how many arrests made? 
 13. AC Chief Sharon Rowe should know better than to indulge in empty speculation which amounts to slander. 
 14. Link 49. There was never any evidence that this man belonged to the EDL. Probably just an opportunist, and a smear tactic. 
 15. Link 50. It is strange that the far left wing Guardian who supports the UAF talk of Nazi salutes but in their tiny article can produce no evidence. One would think they are lying yet again. 
 16. The paragraph that starts “In January 2010” shows clearly that the EDL were hardly at fault and it was their detractors who were the guilty lot. Then later in the paragraph it talks of violence and damage but not who did it, as though it must have been the evil EDL. 
 17. Link 70. The group attacked a passing bus full of black youths? Do you realise how crazy that sounds? There were many blacks about in the area if they wanted to attack them. They didn’t. 
 18. Links 73, 74. Anyone can spray EDL on a mosque. The paint quickly washes off so s some claim, maybe it was the muslims themselves who wanted to make the EDL look bad since none were caught? 
 19. Link 75 not found. 
 20. Link 76. The police are anti EDL as in while they stood there recently letting someone attack Kevin and walk away, then arresting Kevin Carroll (and Tommy Robinson.) 
 21. Link 77. Two FORMER EDL members. What do you not understand about FORMER? 
 22. Link 78. They chanted EDL but no evidence they were members. 
 23. Link 79. Thugs ALIGNED to the EDL? So, not the EDL. 
 24. Link 80. No EDL members arrested. Anyone can claim to be a member. It could even have been muslims wanting to drum up support by using sympathy. 
 25. Link 81 is to London Underground, so no evidence. 
 26. Links 82,83. Lots of pictures of people online posing with weapons, real and fake. Has any EDL member used these at a demo or in anger? Thought not. 
 27. Link 84. Beech has been a member of the BNP and EDL but there is no evidence that either told him to do what he did, so another lying link. 
 28. Link 88. Again anyone can put EDL graffiti on a mosque, even muslims. Links 89 and 90 say it all. 
 Views and reactions. 
 29. The article quotes communist hatemonger Nick Lowles who on BBC Asia recently made a series of nasty allegations against the EDL and when challenged, could back none of them up. It is on you tube. The man is a LIAR. A vile LIAR. 
 30. Shami Chakrabarti can make what vile lying slanders she wants but if you repeat them, you may find yourself in court, like the McAlpine slanders. 
 31. Link 104. Jon Cruddas of the Guardian, one of the far left organisations behind the thugs of the UAF. Why would you repeat his hateful and lying slanders? Do you think you are beyond British justice if the EDL decide to sue you? 
 32. We know Cameron is anti-EDL and pro muslim as are the stooges under him. Their hate speak is as vile and irrelevant as that of the left wingers as they do everything for muslims and nothin