OK here's the source on why I proposed the latter addition of a few more words: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2006-06/21/content_622116.htm.  Now where's your reference for your proposed addition?  An encyclopedia could do with non-outrageously-biased sources to back your POV.  And when we can both back up our points with sources, this 3rd paragraph may finally be 'set'.  But since I can back up my proposed addition of a few more words with a source, this comes back to the original point - why do you object to it, and what are you basing it on?