To explain the reason why I added the Culture Pundits link back-in.  I think an entry that does not fully explain to readers the nature of art blogs is lacking.  Being part of a group like Culture Pundits, or going under an umbrella publishing vehicle - as, for example Tyler Green does - is something that readers should know about.  My perspective is that a lot of people who will read this will be people who want to create art blogs, and so explaining what their options are - in a purely factual way, incorporating positives and negative perspectives - would be very useful information.  You could extend this line of thinking to talk about typepad, blogger, wordpress etc. but I think that would be a step too far - more appropriate for the 'blog' wiki.  Perhaps the only notable thing is that so many people writing art blogs choose blogger.     

 I can see where you are coming from with Art Connect, in that they cover fewer blogs than, say, alltops - one of the other linked-to sites.  However, the entries are far more detailed than anything else out there.  I am told, by someone featured on the site, that they expect to have 100 entries on the site 'within a month'.  Checking the site today, I can see about 30 entries.  Last time I looked, they had less than half that.  On this basis, and in keeping with the view I hold on Culture Pundits (i.e. that this is an aspect that should be factually incorporated), I think that this should be included.