:::::Check the SporeWiki section above.  An argument for sporewiki's inclusion was made, and there was not one dissenting nuetral wikipedia editor.  Therefore, consensus was made on the issue.  There has been nothing even close to consensus on the issue of xspore.com's inclusion.  You have also completly disregarded wikipedia procedure in removing already agreed upon links and have failed to give edit summaries saying so.  You disregard ANY concept of nuetrality and of consensus and you are damaging wikipedia by doing so.  Sporewiki has been argued for, and agreed upon, THEN it was re-added in after being removed.  xSpore was argued for, but also argued against, there has been no agreement and so there should be no inclusion as of yet.  Threats are not taken lightly here and you clearly have no idea how wikipedia works.  This is not a link repository and you can not bully people into taking your point of view.  There is procedure to this kind of thing.  Every other site has followed such procedure (as can be seen if you actually read the other sections) and has been included or excluded.  xSpore has failed to do so because of your flagrant actions against fair deliberation.