OK, so  I got the  following  from you "Please read Wikipedia:No legal threats. Contributors making such threats are liable to be blocked from editing. If you chose to withdraw the threat (which will be necessary for this discussion to continue), please make any further postings at Talk:Sergey Brin as I have asked. This is not the appropriate place to discuss article content, and I will accordingly not respond to any more postings here. AndyTheGrump (talk) " 

 - 

 so as  you requested  I do withdraw  the legal  threat  (if you think it  was  one -I don't want  to  argue) -  so, I  understand your  formal point,  but there is  also "impression"  that  the  text  provides  and  using  information  which is  not true (and you probably have  already  understood  that  it  is not  true, though  it is  real  quotation), so using  such  quotation may  provide  wrong  understanding  as a  whole  about institution? So, are  there  any  special  considerations  why you  think  this particular   quotation *which  is  misleading,  despite  it  is  indeed  a quotaion of a person should  be in  the  text? ...If you  don'twant  to  discuss  it  with me, please  consult me  wether  there  is any  other wikipedia authority (or  moderators community)  that  can  resolve this  dispute  among  you  and  me?  Again, I want  to be as  polite  and  friendly  as possible (sorry  if my English is not  good  enough to  express it)  and  I am  very much upset with  your  immidiate  rely  to  strict measures (blocking  from editing etc.),   talking  to  me  like a police to violater. Hope  you  will explain me your  position or  at  least  will give  me appropriate  consultation where  to  apply  further.  Thank  you  for  your  responce - it is  very  important to me   .