::::::You're "forced to assume" an implicit meaning to my words that runs directly contrary to my explicit meaning? Yeesh. Those in glass houses should not throw WP:GOODFAITH stones. I'm also curious to hear why you think I "attacked" RGloucester  I brought up his name and his role in the AfD and use that as background to draw an analogy, but I'm at a loss to know which of my words you think constituted a personal attack. 
 ::::::I entirely agree when you say . That is why I changed the article text, to avoid the earlier statement that Breivik was somehow pivotal in spreading the term or determining its modern usage. We seem to have found a compromise in the article text, and it's clear that we're not going to get very far in persuading each other, so why don't we call it a day?