NPOV 

 The last paragraph in the Bi-partisan gerrymandering section reads very much like an irate Op-Ed and less like a dictionary. 

 I quote “The redistricting was completely successful in accomplishing its goal of the total disenfranchisement of the voters for the offices involved. There was no change of political party in any of the district elected offices at either the State or Federal level - no member of the State Assembly, State Senator, or U. S. Representative was not of the same party as their predecessor.” 

 I do not think a goal of “total disenfranchisement” can really be shown. While one could argue that maintaining the status quo could be seen as such, I think simply stating something like “The redistricting was successful in accomplishing its goal of maintaining the status quo.” would be a more neutral way of saying this. In other words, let the reader draw their own conclusions as to whether that is right or wrong. -