It's demonstrably not true that MRI is universally known by specialists to be an abbreviation for "nuclear magnetic resonance imaging", and not "magnetic resonance imaging". For example, here is a paper recently published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. (I'm one of the coauthors.) In the first paragraph, it says "...using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)". Many many more examples can very easily be found. Maybe there was a time when "magnetic resonance imaging" was an incorrect shorthand, but that time has passed: its current usage by specialists and everyone else indicates that the term is correct both with and without the "nuclear". Nergaal, you say: "there needs to be a section with regards of the correct nomenclature and with reasons why the wrong name was publicized or used." Does the current third paragraph satisfy this? If not, what other information do you propose including that's not already in the third paragraph?