:You're an IP editor or group of related IP editors so I'm posting this here instead of the various talk pages on the IP accounts. 

 :First see the essays Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article and WP:FATRAT. (You will notice that these are common sense guidelines, not rules. However their points are very important.)  Going back to the discussion of the deletion: The material you deleted seems to add to the article. The wikilinked article you claim should be deleted seems to me to be verifiable and reliably sourced. Therefore your edit, appears to be erroneous. Your discussion about your edit sounds like an opinion to me. And it appears part of a bigger set of opinions which appear to me to be your point of view. You have your point of view and I have mine but regardless of that please stop deleting sourced information. The usual way things are done in Wikipedia is that to move the article toward being better we would help each other find better sourcing and better wording, not slash and burn everything that we don't like. 

 :Second, since this latest deletion appears to be part of the point of view pattern I just can't get interested right now in an editor who may or may not have a personal connection with another subject. My interest is instead drawn to trying to understand why an editor or related group of editors seems committed to applying a Procrustean reading of recommendations (not rules) for wikipedia referencing. He/she/they have deleted a pretty sizable series of various edits (some of which were mine) on the general subject of informing the reader about risks and side effects of a particular family of medicines. That sounds more like his/her/their point of view than anything else. I am a believer in minding my own business so this is elucidation, not criticism. 

 :Third, I suppose by "rules" you mean the guideline you cited to delete some of my edits on the last section you put up here. If you've forgotten, here is it's link. WP:MEDRS It is a guideline and not a rule. You will notice that it it tagged with a brief notation that it should be treated with common sense.