Many parts of the article contain strongly-biased POVs rather than facts. For example, the statement explaining that the king's philosophy is to legitimize his and the royal family's extravagant life has no proven evidence of the relationship between such two things and bluntly jump to the conclusion. Whether it is an abusing act on a neutral free encyclopedia for political or personal purpose, I think any intellectual person reading it will be able to figure out. However, what I can say myself is that a judgement without trial deos not deserve to be anywhere in civilized world.