::P.S. I found this edit summary to be somewhat strained. This isn't really a matter of "NPOV", because film earnings are not a matter of opinion. Nobody is saying that the inflation-adjusted figures are, or even could be, less valid that the unadjusted ones. The thing isif we really want to bring WP:NPOV into thisthat unadjusted figures are presented prominently in the sources; the sources assume A) that the average reader probably isn't going to be extremely interested in inflation; and, probably, B) that the atypical reader, who has such an interest, has enough intelligence to match that interest and, therefore, to do some more research. Essentially, the idea is to keep the lead as nice and neat as possible. And, while a reference to a footnote might add a speck of clutter, it certainly wouldn't force the reader of a bio article into a distracting contemplation of the fluctuations in the world's economies.