"""Why does not including the controversy make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia."" 
 The classic inclusionist argument. Why should not Wikipedia post trivial information if someone will find it interesting WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE. I further more contend that people looking for criticism of Fox will either be: 
 a:Haters just looking for any criticism what-so-ever and not encyclopedic and rationale reasons to hate Fox. Giving info for them is unnecessary, that is what blogs and internet forums. 
 b:People looking for legitimate or significant criticism of Fox in which I think most people will either find this irrelevant noting only the DNC has really criticized them for this, or they will be mislead into believing it is more important then it is because they found it in an online encyclopedia and they just assume only important or notable things get reported here.(as our policy claims it does) 
 ""Even Wikiposter0123 has pointed out some of the other critics."" 
 Only to mock how non-notable they are. A ethics professor of no significance within the ethics field at a small journalism school in Florida whose opinion was posted in a single piece, and Media Matters. Does that sound like a combo that elevates the significance of this topic? No. 
 ""Wikiposter0123, if I'm taking that line literally, then the significant viewpoint is Fox New's objectivity, and/or media bias."" 
 Yes 
 ""That's a widely held view, shared by many groups and individuals, throughout this article."" 
 Many of them also undue weight. 
 ""So, adding the DNC, and head of the DGA, to that list is not undue."" 
 No, it is also undue. 
 And lastly: 
 ""Even if you think it is unfounded, the fact that people are calling it a controversy in the media makes it appropriate for inclusion."" 
 People in the media are not calling it a controversy, they are calling it a criticism by the DNC. A criticism solely by the DNC does not equal significance, and neither does a flash of media coverage on that criticism. Fox news is unpopular enough that if a significant criticism came up it would be widely picked up by its detractors, the fact more people haven't come out and similarly criticized Fox is evidence that this isn't significant.   

 "