: I added those extra names because someone else had made additions that appeared in red and then proceeded to create pages for those actors. In light of this, I decided to go ahead and add actors hoping that someone else would take the initiative to create pages for them. I also figured that if nobody did, I would erase them after a certain period of time had passed. I am the person who originally created this list, and when I first created it, I added all of those people who are listed in red. I thought it looked too cluttered, so I erased them all and added that message on the Talk Page. Upon re-editing the list, I noticed that some of the actors who didn't have Wikipedia pages when I first created the list suddenly did have pages. So after making these changes, I figured that one month was a good time-frame to leave them up and see if anyone would make pages for the actors (You'll also notice that I didn't make any additions to the list of actors that appeared in 2 Best Picture winners. Doing so would make the list way too long). Just so you know, I'm going to give it another week before I start erasing names. Hope that clears things up for you.  
 :: I just came up with a better solution. The actors who were listed in red are now listed in the discussion page with an invitation to create pages for them.   
 ::: Hello.  Thanks for the posting.  Now, I see what you did  that makes sense.  Thanks for the explanation.  I don't really care one way or the other, I had just thought the situation odd and wanted to understand it, that's all.  So, with your explanation, I now understand how this came about and what your thinking was.  Two things to mention to you:  (1) one of the actors  Gino Corrado  now has a wiki article and a blue link, yet is still listed on the Talk Page, without having been transferred into the actual article.  Thought you might want to know.  And (2) ... just out of curiosity ... when you created this page, did you intend for it to be about recognizable-name actors who appeared in several Best Pictures?  Or did you intend for it to be about "no-name" actors / extras?  I am just curious.  Yes, I realize that it is a subjective distinction as to what actor is a "recognizable name" versus a "no-name"  but I was just wondering what your intent originally was.  Thanks.  ( )