: "You wrote in fact one side is supported by both the vast majority of scientific evidence and scientists' opinions. Do you have a source for this?" Yes, and we have talked about it on multiple occasions.  There are the 1000+ scientists involved in the IPCC process, the statements by nearly every major scientific organization, and Oreskes' survey, for example. See scientific opinion on climate change.  All of that is evidence that there is a consensus, and is verifiable.  You keep challenging the "consensus" claim but have never produced any evidence that there isn't a consensus. 

 : "Also, considering that other sources say that "the science is not settled", that there is no consensus, etc., shouldn't we remain neutral on the question of whether the vast scientific majority support the "mainstream view"?"  Should we remain neutral on the question of whether evolution explains current life on Earth?  Wikipedia has a policy of neutrality but as you well know, this policy allows for giving less weight to small minority viewpoints.