Yes, I contend that some of the article I did create were bad... some, very bad, but on the whole, I have contributed some very impormative few sentences on a variety of topics. Whatever you may say, I do honestly believe that I have done good. It is not my fault that 5 years ago, if I had this, I would have gotten no backlash. It is only because we are now in this "so-called" phase where everyone is starting to care about quality more than quantity (of articles) that in its first few hours of creation, an article has to be formatted, copyedited etc. perfectly. I have seen tons and tons of articles of place names etc. and all that is in the article is: X is a Y in Z. That's it... I thought that instead of having like 1 sentence, gtting a bit more info and stuffing it in would at least give the article a bit more pezazz. As already mentioned, yes, it results in a "mismatch" (I guess you could call it) of Google hits, but that doesn't make the concept, or even the article bad. You may hate the articles, there is nothing I can do to sstop you, and as past cases have proven, I agree with you in some cases. What I am saying is, stop dissing my articles for the wrong reasons.