== Legal Language == 

 This article is very well written but in legal language which may be hard for some to understand.  For instance: 

 :"Sanity is a rebuttable presumption and the burden of proof is on the party relying upon it; the standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities, that is to say that mental incapacity is more likely than unlikely. If this burden is successfully discharged, the party relying upon it is entitled to succeed."  

 Which could be worded: 

 :"Sanity is a rebuttable presumption [since this is linked it is ok] and if either the prosecution or the defence raise it as question, then it is up to them to prove a mental incapacity on the balance of probabilities, that is to say that mental incapacity is more likely than unlikely. If they satisfy this proof then mental incapacity should be considered in the outcome of the case." 

 Not being a lawyer, this may not be a correct statement so I have not made these changes.  However the idea is to reword some of the more obscure words or terms in the artilcle that lawyers may immediately understand but which the public may not. 

 Also, why is there no link to this article or mention of the subject in the mens rea entry and if it is inserted then where and how?