::::::::I agree with Andy the Grump that Wikipedia policies concerning sourcing, verifiability, original research and NPOV are not subject to being overridden by this RfC, because Thepointoffit has essentially said that the answer to everything is to read Locke's letter.  That's not how things work here, and if Thepointoffit is not going to provide sources equal to or greater than the legitimate sources provided by Brittanicus, this RfC should be closed precipitously as meaaningless.  Some interpretation of Wikipedia policies can be subjected to consensus between editors (as, for instance, as to WP:WEIGHT), but the policies themselves must still be followed.  Thepointofit appears to be incapable or unwilling to follow those policies, despite explanations provided on their talk page.