:::::I thought you were okay with it based on your last conversation.  I'm not sure I understand your objection - are you objecting?  I'm not accusing anyone of improper editing and not making any administrative complaint against anyone, just testing out a system for verifying that contributors to the pages got notice.  I gave a non-accusatory notice to about ten people, on a test basis, who had made significant edits to two of the Obama articles in the past day or so.  The edit of yours I saw was probably this one.[It was this one I believe.  I didn't make any judgment regarding whether the edits were disruptive, nor did I make any special effort to dig into their contribution histories to see whether they knew - in my opinion probation is only going to work if people are demonstrably alerted to page protection before, not after, they make a questionable edit, and issuing the first notice as a warning creates contention and defeats the whole purpose.  That inevitably means that some people get told something they already knew, and plenty of people are alerted to rules they were not about to break anyway, but I don't see any harm to that.