":You mean 'after Retcon, a known sockpuppeteer/vandal/evidence forger/provoker/stater-of-untruths (since calling such ""lies"" would somehow be wrong here) posted his list of crap to every other talk page on Wikipedia trying to get  blocked, and was ignored, and posted said list again, and got ignored again, and then emailed the list to a load of administrators to find one that would actually take him seriously, there was bound to be one....' Did you bother to actually do any research to see what I could have ever possibly been responding to before busting over here like cyber-Barney Fife, in the cases that aren't completely out of context to start with, or did you just see a list of words and see fit to start threatening editors? Nevertheless, I have composed the following list of WP:NPA, WP:CIV, WP:AGF, and probably WP:OtherStuff violations. Please do also warn these users with equal vehemence, threaten to block them, add them to your little now-hidden worklist, etc., lest we have a clear case of administrator favoritism on our hands. Stuff like POV was left out, lest there be the need for actual research and since Wikipedia's available space to store the list is finite, and vandalism was just left out period, partly for the same reasons. Among other things, there's enough 'commenting on the editor, not the edit' to go around, and then back around again numerous times. I make no representation that every single one of these is necessarily a clearcut case of anything in particular (although WP:CIV seems to be a pretty big catch-all), especially since people's standards vary (for example, note that I didn't run crying to administrators that people were being mean to me and digging up people's entire edit histories as a glorified form of dispute resolution when my untenable arguments got shot down by other editors), but there should be more than enough good stuff here to make the entire nuclear family unit happy: 

 ::User:  

 ::""Hypocrite... your obsessive need to slander and lie... your motives for such behavior, highly questionable... you are being deceptive"" 

 ::""The only thing you demonstrate here is your profound lack of knowledge"" 

 ::""in awe of your hypocracy [sic]... Your demonstrable lack of compassion and objectivity is only surpassed by your hypocracy [sic]... The attitude you take against truth and objectivity"" 

 ::Edit summary: ""biased tripe"" 

 ::Edit summary: ""POV tripe"" 

 ::""you have perpetuated a tradition of one sided criticism... this crap should be deleted"" 

 ::Edit summary: ""Elias don't misrepresent"" 

 ::""this trash"" 

 ::""your misunderstanding is not mine"" 

 ::""one anonymous critic ignorantly claimed"" 

 ::""if you were at all concerned about NPOV you would have no objections to my change"" 

 ::Edit summary: ""removed the BS..."" 

 ::Edit summary: ""You're a real piece of work Tomm"" 

 ::""You are not being reasonable or objective"" 

 ::""What's the matter with you?"" 

 ::Edit summary: ""Stop being unreasonable and misleading"" 

 ::[http://en.w