Hello again. It seems your post at the talk page got someone confused.  HighInBC thinks it's a consensus review and  FkpCascais sure acts in that way. I complained about FkpCascais because he keeps preventing the implementation of the consensus with his last comment and HighInBC doesn't seem to think there's anything wrong with that comment, because he thinks it's a consensus review. Now I'm totally confused, are they both kidding me around or am I misunderstanding you? You just pinged involved editors to introduce the consensus to the article, right? You didn't invite them to review the consensus? If that is correct, maybe you could stress out that I provided a concrete request that would apply the consensus, in "replace X with Y" form.