::::::If you look at the article I've already added two inline citations whilst the debate has been ongoing, so I resent your accusation and I feel I could direct it back at you.  However that doesn't really get us anywhere, does it, and we're meant to focus on the content.  As I said, all I asked for were specific statements you wished to challenge, I'm not sure why that has proved so hard to detail.  And I don't mean to suggest you are treating this article any differently to any other, and I look forwards to your help in citing sources. Which areas do you want to take care of?