:FT2 ... thanks for sharing your interpretation of policy, which reiterated what I already said. As a note, it's "Lar" not "lar" ) Jay*Jay: Where is this going? I think we see through most pretexts if they're flimsy. And if I find an unexpected sock, which happens all the time, unless there is some strong reason to investigate further (like a quick check of contribs shows disruption, double voting or the like), I do nothing at all about it. Socks are not forbidden by policy, only disruptive use of them. ++: /