:::::: just to annoy you (obviously I don't have to).  Of course he's a conspiracy theorist, the heading was called Conspiracy Claims.  In any case, the claim didn't come from him anyway, it just happened to be on his YouTube channel.  Furthermore, it is irrelevant whether or not he is "anti-Bilderberg" because, first of all, probably anybody in their right mind is pretty "anti-Bilderberg" anyway, but furthermore I had made the statement quite neutral by stating that the claims held little weight and why they held such little weight.  However, it is still noteworthy that such claims were made, particularly under the Conspiracy heading, and people reading Wikipedia should have access to that information.  Lastly,  
 :::::: 11:53 PM EST, 28 June 2011 
 ::::::P.S. Ya don't need to be a dick about it (also P.S. means post-signature)