::::::::::::Orlady, would you please make a specific proposal as to how you would like to resolve this Poquetanuck vs. NRHP HD article issue.  Please create an alternative version of the Poquetanuck article that includes a supported description of the relationship between Poquetanuck and the NRHP HD (if you want to mention the NRHP HD) and includes whatever other sources you feel should be included in the article.  You can do so in a subpage to this Talk page.  (Acroterion commented somewhere above that this could be done only in a User space page, but the guidelines are in fact clear that Talk subpages are fine, and it would be sensible to have it as a subpage here as an extension of this discussion.)  My basic proposal is to keep the Poquetanuck article essentially as it is, with no mention of the NRHP HD, and for there to be no redirect from the NRHP HD to this article.  The NRHP HD should show as a redlink in the CT NRHP list-article and in the Preston town article, but not be mentioned at all in the Poquetanuck article (which is odd, but that is my proposal, because it seems too difficult to construct any mention in the Poquetanuck article).  And, further, it is my proposal that there to be no mere NRIS-based NRHP HD stub article created.  And my proposal is also to ask via a template at Talk:Poquetanuck that no one should create the NRHP HD article unless a) a DYK-equivalent length starter article could be created, using substantial information like the NRHP document, and b) the person creating it judges that it is beneficial to have the NRHP HD be a separate article.  I already modified the NRHP list-article's description column to link to the Poquetanuck article, per your suggestion somewhere above.  You create an alternative proposal, and then let's have a limited bit of question and answer about what the proposals are, and then have a vote or whatever, and move on.  Polaron and I have more or less agreed to abide by Acroterion's ultimate decision.  I am assuming that you don't want to get and use the NRHP document before a decision is made.  The decision would be more or less binding on Polaron and me, but I hope you would also agree in advance to abide by it, whatever it is.  If you want to collect and use the NRHP document first before a decision is to be made, please say so.  However otherwise I think we should come to a decision about this one article, within a day or two.