":}}}}} current talk page]. 
 |}__NOEDITSECTION__ 

 == JSR's edits == 

 JSR's edit was to removing the sourced information, thus a vadalism, I don't see how a complete re-written would make a different, different scholar's opiinons are to be included anyway.    

 You can believe JSR for all you like, that's your personal bais towards him. See the article talk page for my reply.    

 ::As for: Doesn't matter, it doesn't change a thing, I provide another scholar source: He's simply lying. He has reverted thrice to the exact same content the he has been pushing all along. No new sources, scholars or text. He neither has the source, nor has he read it, and neither does his source deal in any manner with surgery—on which he likes to edit and push POV. Childish cries of 'believing' and 'bias' are disruptive for those who have warned him before and have even thanked him for taking it easy once and are his way of defending things but vandalism remains vandalism. Saying ""Doesn't matter, it doesn't change a thing, I provide another scholar source"" after previous promises of refraining from vandalism (""I did not meant it, please forgive me once!"") mean that the ditor is used to it.    

 :Just one question.    

 What a prick, don't act like an matured 'adult' (even if you're old) when you have neither the guts nor intelligent to speak up.    

 ::I appreciate the humor and am seriously amused but here's the thing: An editor who simply reverts everything I write (whether its on an article on surgery or his talk page) has for some reason held an entire article hostage and is taking his sweet time to write one line replies (he takes a nano second to undo what I write on his talk page. Is that allowed?) while I'm waking at 4 AM with work tomorrow and making spelling mistakes due to exhaustion. Only on Wikipedia ) Is talking like that allowed BTW?    

 I revert your removal not edits, what edits you made had revert by me? Shown me.    

 I don't care what time you work tomorrow, I have my own life too, so is on your burden besides lying on this page. Get used to it.    

 ::Lets see: revert 1, revert 2, and a claimed 'move' which is actually a delete. More questions, Anpersonalaccount.   

 So what? Do you know that 3RR rules doesn't even cover user talk page? If you indend to discuss the matter you should had been discussing on article talk page and take it seriously.    

 :::I presume that he did it because he doesn't want people to know that he engaes in vandalism. Can I remove those lines now? Anpersonalaccount is just posting here on this talk page when talk:Sushruta needs replies from him which he doesn't seem to have.    

 Lol, you're very funny, I did it because you're annoying that's why, not because I wanna cover up my ass. There is nothing for me to hide. As for I engaes in vandalism, shown me again.    

 == 1964 Gabon coup d'état == 

 Nish, keep me posted on the FAC in terms of how you want to proceed; I know you're tr