:::::Parkwells:  Again, as I just explained above I am not arguing for 'my own' or any specific interpretation. Again, if the topic is a 'controversy' then the reader should be made clear as to why that is. The facts section serves this end very well (and thank you again btw). As an editor you are allowed to refer to historians in an overall or tertiary capacity, mentioning that e.g. they all concur on this, some concur on that, or none concur on 'this' or mention 'that'.. It is perfectly acceptable to mention that few if any of the historians referred to offer any evidence for things like appearances, whereabouts, etc. of the other candidates.