GA Review== 
 :This review is transcluded from Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 

 ==Passed GA 
 Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process. 
 *It is reasonably well written. 
 *:a (prose):  b (MoS):  
 :::Writing is of a high standard (8/10). 
 *It is factually accurate and verifiable. 
 *:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  
 :::References are all reliable and appropriately positioned. 
 *It is broad in its coverage. 
 *:a (major aspects):  b (focused):  
 *It follows the neutral point of view policy. 
 *:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views):  
 *It is stable. 
 *: 
 *It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. 
 *:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
 *Overall:  
 *:a Pass/Fail:  

 Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.