::::::::::::Damian, you are so eager to be right that you continue to miss the point: there are theories (Hutto, Nagel etc) that do not use one or another of the terms 'free will' or 'determinism' and do not define the two in terms of one another. Hence, dividing the article free will in two parts only according to 'compatibilist' or 'incompatibilist' automatically misconstrues or distorts these authors' positions, which basically have nothing to do with this division.