:::::::::: Respectfully, I disagree alexbrn.  Gandy is talking about this article; she is making an argument from analogy which I find a reasonable way to argue.  Gandy, the answer would be yes  if the article wanted to present a protesters' position, that abortion is bad for women because it makes them mentally ill, I would hope that the editors working on it would make clear that as a statement about reality this is a fringe viewpoint.  If the article presented a protesters' viewpoint, that God hates abortion, there is no scientific-based consensus one can point to. (although some theologians might say this is a fringe position in their world)   In this article, I was very curious how the content would work out, that was focused on protesters' positions and concerns about FRINGE.  As it turned out, scientific consensuses about GMOs (as far as they exist) are clearly stated, and the protesters' beliefs are clearly stated, too, both in language that is pretty NPOV and uncluttered. (I imagine using the word "belief" in stating protesters' concerns was the result of some intense discussions)   I respect the work you all did, a lot, especially in the toxic environment that was here.  I doubt anybody finds it perfect, but it is good, and it seems to have achieved stability, which is a huge accomplishment.