" 

 == Your AfC review of Programming Boot Camp == 

 Hi, Maestroso simplo, and welcome to AfC! Can I ask what your rationale is for accepting this article into mainspace (and rating it C-class)? In my opinion, it reads like an advertisement and is not ready for mainspace. While it does refer to many sources, some of its sources appear questionable at first glance due to their promotional nature. Your accept at Toby Byron I was also hoping you could explain. Not only does it read like an advertisement, it also suffers from multiple issues (which you are aware of) - you added the tags (but then you rated it C-class...). In my opinion, since WIkipedia is a permanent backlog of sorts, I try to avoid using these tags if I can clean it up myself. I also try to avoid using more than 3 or 4, because it looks like an overload to me. If you think the article needed more citations/references, especially as a BLP, I think you should have declined it using verifiability and non-notable. That list of redlinks doesn't really look good to me... just a thought. Perhaps veteran AfC admin  would like to weigh in? —   "