" 
 This user not only is in violation of WP:3RR, but also WP:PA on Job (professional wrestling). 
 :-  
 ::You wanted admin involvement, now you have it.  Let's see what they think. 
 ::-  

 :::Fair enough, but crying over a 3RR that isn't is not arbitration. I want a peaceful solution that both sides can agree to.   

 ::::The entire arguement is bullshit.  Does it really matter wether humor has a sub-heading or not?  I think it reads much better without one.  -  

 :::Fine. But the info belongs. There is your compromise.   
 ::::It's only a compromise if two groups are meeting in the middle.  Even if I do agree with you, which is a stretch, the two of us would need to convince at least two of the other people in the arguement that we're right.  I'm sorry, but you lost...  get over it... -  
 *Let's see if he edits it again or not. I somehow think he might.   

 == Final state highway naming conventions debate == 

 WillC, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8. 

 Regards,   

 == Jobbers (professional wrestling) == 

 WillC, I got your note about the above page, but since none of the other users seem to want to mediate, I don't think I'll be able to help.  If you want, I will review the page history and let you know what I think.   

 : I'll take a look when I have a chance.  In the meantime, you have a lot of interests, and a lot of other pages you can edit, so why don't you move onto something else for a few days, just to reduce your wiki-stress level?  By the way, what does the top line on your user page mean?   

 You have now been blocked for 4 days for trolling such as here. If you cannot be respectful of process and other users, you will not be permitted to edit.   

 :::Please see my email to you on this subject. And by the way, if you check the contributions/talk pages of the other editors in question, you'll see that they do indeed work as a team to get their way page by page. Through bullying, ""voting"", and revolving who reverts a page they get their way and target those who try to stop them. I also see that Renosecond was blocked for just one day. I get four and he gets one???? Please explain after reading my email to you ad this. I think the DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH line will make much more sense then, considering my accusations against them were true and their vehement denial was because it was true what I said. I caught them lying.   

 ::::First of all, don't accuse other users of lying. Secondly, I'll respond here. Yes, you quoting Shakespeare is incivil, try as you might to wiggle out of it. There is NO EXCUSE for that type of behavior, I don't care what 'everyone else' is doing. Try any of that again once your block expires and you'll simply be blocked for longer.   
 :::But they did lie. Maybe you should have researched that before blocking me. So why am I blocked for four as opposed to one day like the other guy?   

 ::::Because you've done this before, and show no signs of stopping anytime soon. As a matter of fact, your continued insistance on making incivil accusations towords other users, correct or not, makes me inclined to simply extend your block now.   
 :::That's not fair when this argument is two sided. Do you expect me to just lay down and take it? Does the fact that I have repeatedly asked for arbitration/compromise in good faith mean nothing to you? WE HAD A MEDIATOR WILLING TO WORK WITH US! Why block now before he had a chance to work?   

 ::::I don't expect you to 'lay down and take it', but I do expect that you not respond in kind if you ever want to be unblocked. The mediator is immaterial; if you cannot be civil, mediation won't work, anyway.  N