== Concerning NPOV == 

 That an article named "Criticism of [whatever]" deals mainly with negative 
 issues is natural; further, that even criticisms that are not unopposed are 
 included is right and proper. 

 Still, I see several weaknesses with this particular article, two explicitly 
 discussed below. I note, in particular, that it is proper to present views 
 opposing the criticisms (at least with one sentence statements and 
 links/references for further reading), and in controversial topics and matters 
 of taste, like e.g.  Linux vs. Windows, there will be an opposing view to 
 almost everything. 

  Further, Linux has been accused of being "not ideal" for intermediate power 
  users. 

 This statement is highly odd to me, because criticism is usually directed based 
 on beginners and intermediate users (not "intermediate power users"). I 
 have checked the three references: Two seem irrelevant, and only "Living ..." 
 seems relevant to the sentences in question. I have removed the two irrelevant 
 references and the misleading word "power". 

  Linux had been broadly criticized in the past for its lack of support for 
  hardware devices. 

 While it is technically true that Linux has been critized for 
 lacking hardware support, this statement is highly misleading. Looking at the 
 operating systems themselves, Linux is actually ahead of most others, including 
 Windows. The hitch is that hardware developers fail to provide necessary 
 drivers to Linux, because they consider the net-benefit to small (or even 
 negative). Windows, due to its market share, does not have this problem. 
 I have rephrased this section to indicate that hardware developers do not 
 support Linux sufficiently, rather than the other way around. (Note that, while 
 the end effect for a low-end user is the same, this is highly pertinent when 
 doing a factually correct critique or comparison.)