make mention of these similar facts at every stage - I mean honestly, what do such editors expect? After every piece of information that we include that Saakashvili condemns it? OK, we fucking get it already. However, unlike Russia-South Ossetia relations where I have been very careful to include opposing points of view on major points, Kosovo articles make absolutely zero mention of the disputed status of Kosovo, and they will need to include such information in order to reach NPOV. So editors are welcome to include such information, as I already have with the Albanian and Estonian articles, but the removal of POV tags over a legitimate POV dispute is not on. And that is regardless of the reasons for its placement.    

 Sorry, but we can't have it all ways. If it is ok to insist on such shit on A&SO; articles 

 ==Possible vandalism== 
 Hello,  

 I believe some of your recent actions can be classified as disruptive behavior. You have committed more than 50 identical edits in less than an hour, justifying your actions by the fact that "Termer has seen fit to tag A&SO; articles