" 

 == Using confidential information == 

 (ec) Dear Spartaz, 

 If you have information gleaned from your access to OTRS, or when you were in private discussions with me several years ago in order to help me, you have an ethical responsibility to not use that information to make public attacks against me. 

 If you have allegations to make about me, please make them here on Wikipedia or on Wikimedia Commons where I might be able to respond with facts, rather than using Wikipediocracy with the apparent expectation that anything you say there, will have no repercussions on your rights on Wikimedia projects. 

 I have had no interaction with you for years, so I have no idea why you might feel I am provoking you now. Perhaps you could provide me the basic human dignity to be able to move on from mistakes of the past and spend your volunteer time on something positive, rather that finding nasty ways to hound me? 

 Thanks    

 *1. It is not a breach of the privacy policy to forward an email to the arbitration committee - especially when they keep a register of previous accounts for users who have clean started and want to register their previous accounts. What they do with that subsequently is their business.  
 *2. Has you not lied to me about your previous accounts this would not have got you into trouble later. As we had interacted during your previous tenure it is inconceivable that you would not have realised that I would want to know you were also .  
 *3 You subsequently obtained adminship by deception by not disclosing that your previous account had been taken to RFC for their behavior on BLP subjects.  
 *4. When you were unmasked, I emailed the OTRS admins and queried why they had given access to privileged private information to someone who left en under a cloud of BLP opprobrium. Their response was unsatisfactory and I resigned my OTRS membership in response. Commenting on this does not require access to any privileged information as my memory is perfectly good thank you. 
 *5 In terms of leaving me alone, how many times do you tell your best buddy Russavia to leave me alone when he was using socks to harass me on my user page?  
 *6 By the same token, did you tell him to cease when he went through my uploads to commons and revenge nominated some of my images? 
 *7 By the same token, when you revenge nominated for deletion Kevin Rutherford's images in response to his taking OTRS action following your best buddy's global ban did you consider for one moment that you were displaying any of the behaviors that you are asking me to cease? *At least my actions are off wiki. Good day to you.  ''  
 **Noting that Fae amended his message after I responded.  '  
 ***Noting that I have read our email exchange from March 2010 and that the privacy policy in force at that time is this one. Specifically privileged information can be shared with ... inter alia.. Arbitrators and that the policy at that time also allowed the release of information... inter alia... When necessary for investigation of abuse complaints, which I do not consider to be a stretch to consider arbitration proceedings.  '  

 Responses: 
 :1 - I was not referring to this, only your posts on Wikipediocracy recently. 
 :2 - I was not referring to these events dating back to 2009, it does not appear relevant to your actions now. 
 :3 - I am sure people can refer to the Arbcom case for the facts if they wish. I did review the situation with a sitting Arbcom member before starting RFA, as you are aware. 
 :4 - This is the first time I have heard about it. It seems a bit late to be digging this up now. 
 :5 - I know nothing about this, your page was not even on my watch-list until today. 
 :6 - No, I was not even aware of ""revenge nominations"". If I ever commented in a DR related to this, it was not as part of any pattern and I do not recall ever doing so. I do not watch everything you do on Commons, nor did I watch everything Russavia did. I am not Russavia, nor do I take responsibility for his actions''. If you wish to have my help on Commons, please leave me a note there. 
 :7 - I briefly looked at 's contributions to assess if he was acti