bottle of water, the ocean etc), and a symbolic notation in a single picture. 
 #It is fuzzy and lacks clarity. 
 :::This is improved in the new version of the picture 

  

 ===Strength: Flask picture=== 
 # It is a beautiful picture 
 # The flasks are labeled as various acids and bases 

 ===Weakness: Flask picture=== 
 # There is no chemical insight conveyed by the picture. 
 # All of these solutions are colorless. Having them artificially colored promotes the cliche of chemists being busy handling colorful solutions. That is not the reality. 
 # It would be dangerous to store bases and acids right next to each other in glass bottles. 
 # It is not good laboratory practice to store bases in glass bottles because it leaches out the cations. 
 # The concentrations of the solutions aren't shown on the bottles. In a chemical laboratory, you would have to throw these solutions out because it is not clear how concentrated they are. 

  
 ===Strength: Furnace picture=== 
 # It is a beautiful, dramatic picture 
 # It shows that chemistry is necessary to produce steel, one of the most basic building materials 
 # It shows a chemical reaction 
 # It shows that the field of chemistry is linked to economic activity 

 ===Weakness: Furnace picture=== 
 # The caption does not explain the chemistry 
 # The caption restates definitions of chemistry given in the other image caption and in the lede in slightly different wording 

 Another way of improving the images would be to explicitly say why they are relevant to chemistry in the figure legend. 

 == Kick it off with a numeral == 

 Under the Element subheading, a sentence is started with the numeral 94. If I recall correctly, it is considered unacceptable to begin sentences with numerals, therefore, this situation ought to be corrected. (I apparently don't have the right to edit things just yet.)     
 :That's what I learnt in English class ... fixed.    

 == Etymology note == 

 The parenthetical note "the etymology of the word has been much disputed" is a bit too editorial, particularly for this type of article. Furthermore it reads like a caveat which is unrelated to the actual subject of the article. Suggest using something shorter, for example: 
 * Chemistry (etymology[note]) 
 * Chemistry (etymology disputed[note]) 
 - 67.161..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 == Mixt bodies? == 

 Is it a term I'm not aware of, or is "mixt bodies" a typo? 
 Under "Definitions": 
  - Chymistry (1661) – the subject of the material principles of mixt bodies (Boyle). - 
 Clarification or editing would be appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by