:::"The rest, if it hasn't already been addressed, is self-published original research." I ask all readers here to agree or disagree with that statement. The three relevant sources you linked are quite clearly self-published (or at a minimum, lacking editorial oversight). They are not original research unless you authored one of them. Are you really, seriously expecting wikia.com to be taken seriously in this context by anyone except yourself? I meant credible publications. I thought that was obvious. Then why didn't you cite credible publications? But then we must define "credible." Here you go. Moving on. Are you going to strike your embarrassingly outdated Michio Kaku quote now that it has been pointed out to you as such? Before you do, though, maybe you should browse the publications listed at Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly#Peer reviewed publications. I do not see a bunch of "physics fascists" (I will join Paradoctor in endorsing a topic ban for you the next time you use that term BTW) rushing to blacklist the scientists that brought forth their findings. I see people openly, excitedly, and skeptically investigating a remarkable experimental result.