You were told. here: 

 This request seems to be based on exactly the sort of misconception that [[Wikipedia:official names]] seeks to address.    

 Ooh, look. And here too: 

 You seem not to understand the [[WP:AT|article naming policy]] with regard to ''official'' names. See [[Wikipedia:official names]] for an informal explanation. I referred you to both of these before.    

 Here's the facts: 

 * No one (that means you) has demonstrated that the article should be moved, either by establishing that "US Cellular Center" is the name most commonly used, or in any other way established by policy. 
 * You've been referred to official policy summaries on the matter and have yet to even attempt to explain how your motion for a move comports with them. Now you're playing dumb and denying that you were ever referred to those policies. 
 * There is no reason to believe that anyone will be "confused" by the name of the article. We have a notice at the top of the article for the Iowa venue, and the Asheville venue article lists the official name. It's been three months since the thing was officially renamed. Moving per WP:OFFICIALNAMES is premature in the extreme, in my opinion. 

 That last bit bears repeating  we only have three months to go on as to what the common name of the venue now is. It is entirely possible that, in the future, the official name will be the common name. As of now, however, you have not demonstrated that, nor have you seemingly made any attempt to. 

 I'm trying really hard not to be rude, but I (and I think Andrewa as well) would appreciate some reciprocation in regard to you actually reading the things we refer you to, and intelligently laying out how your vision for the article best comports with policy. Evanh2008, Super Genius