== Auto-biography? == 

 The creator of the article claims the image in the infobox is his own work and that he is the image's copyright-holder, a claim confirmed by OTRS.  That same image appears on the front page of the subject's website.  If the editor is in a position to license the use of an image from the subject's website  and, indeed, is the image's creator and copyright-holder  then the creator and principal editor of the article is either the subject himself or a close associate.  Either way, he should not have created the article himself and should not be editing it.    

 : To my knowledge, there's no policy that an article should not be created by the subject of the article. The only policy is that articles must use reliable, verifiable sources and that it be neutral. That is essentially what Wikipedia:Autobiography states. 
 : The original author is not the only author, others have edited it as well, which means that it is approved by other editors in the community. 
 : Unless you have a specific objection to the article as it stands, I don't think the article should be tagged with the autobiography template.