:::::::What do you mean we don't have any evidence the MJ article is wrong?  The TB article clearly says that BB&T; was the entity requiring the Ayn Rand books.  Left to this we are required by the sourcing to include the TB article which contridicts the MJ article.  This should not be contencious unless you have a problem with the Koch's not really requiring Rand's books.  MJ is not a neutral source in this matter either.  Also, MJ clearly went through lengths to cite the sources for their statements.  Logically it does not hold that there would be some other source for this when the Tb article clearly states the BB&T; source.  MJ is in error why should we repeat that error as fact?