I've started reviewing all the quotes in the FAQ using pseudo-X and similar descriptors; but I'm exhaused and busy so it may be a few days. I want to sort them into (a) declarations that, in general, scholarship thinks it's junk/pseudo - there's quite a number (b) statements of the author's personal opinion that it is junk/pseudo, and (c) the rest - mainly indicating it is at the fringe.  

 Then I'll look at who the authors are that call it junk/pseudo: specialty and religious orientation. I know the latter shouldn't matter... but it does. After that, I'll form a firmer opinion about the "most of whom..." bit. But now I need to sleep for a couple of days.