" 

 == Re: Comment's on Snowded's page == 

 I take your point concerning my comment on Snowded's page. On retrospect it might not have been a good idea as it may only stir thing's up further. I shall remove my post and avoid making any further comments. Thank's for the advice.    
 == Rand == 

 Interesting set of proposals that you are developing! Do you intend to address the question of evidence?  Its the most important thing and without something in place its just not worth editing the article.     

 :I would like to, but I think Arbcom will baulk at doing that about content in this instance. I'm unsure whether I have the motivation to do that much, since I'm not sure how much of this would be adopted anyway. If Arbcom start to make decisions, then I may be moved to do more.   "