Feb 2005 (UTC) 
 ::If Bishonen feels the need to insult people, he should have the good grace to do it in front of them instead of behind their back: I'm the "someone who didn't know what peer review is for" and I stumbled over these comments, and I gotta say I resent his tone. And for the record, I'm a he. 

 ::I mean, I thought the purpose of peer review was, I don't know, peer review. Review, by your peers, of articles. Just a crazy idea I had, I guess, since I couldn't find a single other outlet for getting, you know, peer review of an article. Not RfC, not Village Pump, nothing. Considering that one of the items on the page was for the Monty Hall problem article, whose sole problem was convincing one (1) clueless user that he was dead wrong about the solution, my request didn't seem at all out of place. Certainly not worth deleting out of hand. 

 ::And call me timid, but I've never been crazy about unilateral action in deleting stuff, especially given the hoo-hah and cries of censorship  caused when he did it for Clitoris and Autofellatio: I prefer consensus and advice  peer review, as it were  before taking action.  06:03, 21