Full reasoning for removing articles: 

 *As previously stated: "I'm removing Reuters UK addition because it adds nothing to this article. The fact another newspaper noted a controversy adds nothing. The fact Kim said she had no comment, also adds nothing." No reason to support inclusion of this article was made (except 'to add an additional article to demonstrate articles were written' which was refuted above). 
 **Though I removed previous lines about the Reuters UK article, I believe it does have some value. I have added the line "Questions over the judges, the judging system, and the anonymity of scores were also raised." citing this article. 

 *As previously stated: "I'm removing Fox sports addition because it adds nothing to this article. A sports reporter saying that there have been past controversies and that 'conspiracy theories that are having a blast' doesn't add to this article. There is already a statement in that journalists questioned the composition of the judging panel, naming a specific journalist, doesn't add to this page." No reason to support inclusion of this article was made. 

 *Removing ESPN article for same reason as above. I already noted it's lack of purpose for inclusion. No reason to support inclusion of this article was made.