::Well, for one, where it had said 'meta', it then said 'Phil' with no distinct visual indicator that it was a link (not your fault) or what 'Phil' was (who's Phil?).  'meta' is more intuitive and a link to meta:Metapedianism would be better.  If a userbox espouses an individual philosophy, you'd expect it, if it links to anything at all, to link to more information on that individual philosophy, just as you'd expect a userbox espousing an individual religion to link to Christianity, say, as opposed to Religion.  Also, given the nature of metapedianism, you'd expect 'editor' as opposed to 'user'.  Cheers! —