::I agree with the root thread. This section is neutral in its writing, although the content is itself not neutral. (In a section entitled "Reception," neutrality should not ever be found in the specific content anyways.) Since the material in the section is amply referenced, then it is the duty of those displeased with the slant of the content to find positive reviews (Need I add "from reputable book reviewers" as a caveat?). The original author and redactors do seem to have referenced a respectable spread of well-respected book reviewers; they should be praised for this. All this comes down to one thing: sometimes popular items are not good literature/cinema/etc., and vice versa. James Joyce's Ulysses has been called as the best novel of the 20th century by Random House's Modern Library publishing group, and it cannot be called 'popular' by any extent of one's imagination. Outside Wikipedia, then, there should be a discussion on these seemingly contradictory patterns, but I motion that the tag of non-neutrality be removed.