== Accreditation status in lead == 

 Copied from my Talk page    

 ElKevbo, Would you not agree that information regarding accreditation and Newberry's warning status belongs in the accreditation section? The SACSCOC disclosure statement regarding the warning status is cited in the new edits. Thanks.    
 :No.  A warning from an accreditor is quite serious and such information belongs in the lead where other vital information about the subject is placed. 
 :I also advise you to consult our policy regarding edit warring.  It's fine that you made the original edits and that I reverted them but the next step is to discuss the issue, not for you to begin an edit war.  So please revert your edits and take the issue to the article's Talk page.