Actually, you cited a blurb about a ReasonTV video editorial, not the source itself, and the blurb was written by editor.  It does not note any consensus, it offers an opinion about the consensus.  Note, this is entirely different than the neutral wording used by the Associated Press.  I have no objections to using this video editorial somewhere in the article, and I've opened a separate thread to discuss it.  However, you misused the source, which is why it was removed.