Basically, I'm tempted to not even bother to reply to such a statement. 

 I have not "taken control" of this article. 

 Remember, any person can edit any article at any time on Wikipedia. 

 It seems like you and I are the only ones interested in editing it. 

 Are you mad because I removed the link to the 1111tv forum. 

 Basically, as far as I could tell, the material was meant to do nothing but drive traffic to the forum. 

 Remember Wikipedia is not a tool to promote any forum. 

 If the forum is notable enough (and there are standards for notability for forums) then it can have it's own article. 

 As far as letting only those with experience edit the article, well that directly contravenes Wikipedia's policies in ways too numerous to count. 

 The article still needs a lot of cleanup.  It needs to cite some reputable, verifiable sources.  See WP:V for guidelines on sources.  And of course a neutral point of view is essential. 

 Perhaps there might be some material in reputable journals that approach the subject from an EthnoMathematical perspective.  But I'm too busy to go looking. 

 

  

 == Personal Preference II == 

 You'll have to pardon my lack of Wikipedia knowledge. This entire interface is rather cluncky when navigating and posting. 

 That new link is going to the same place as the other forum link and was added by another user. The new one should be removed.  

  
 This subject matter will most likely never be proved just as one cannot prove the existence of Satan, God, or Ghosts, Near Death Experiences etc...  

 Do people want to give up their real names and be quoted? Maybe and maybe not, if they did it would be deleted anyhow because some are just everyday people not famous writers, mathematicians, scientists and so forth. As you can see when the number is googled you will find thousands of hits from people in various forums whom say the exact same thing. They are all amazed there are web pages that deal in the subject matter because they thought they were the only ones whom noticed the 1111 thing.  

 It's nice that Wikipedia has this article so others can read up on it even if it is rather short and brief. As yet it's unexplainable. If you don't experience it then again why would someone who knows nothing about say surgery edit a wik page on surgery procedures or edit the Battle of Waterloo when you don't know the history of the event. Thats the point I'm making—The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  .