" 
 :::::Even though I didn't want to, I decided to read your rant.  First, you are completely misconstruing the purpose of NPOV.  It's not to make the article neutral in giving fringe theorists an outlet for their babbling.  NPOV is to state what is supported by reliable sources by not giving undue weight to stupid, fringe ideas.  And your sources?  One is 16 years old and I could find NOTHING that confirmed it.  Really, you need to give this one up.  There is not one single reliable source supporting your point of view.  NONE.  One more thing.  I don't give one shit about your pseudo-psychological babbling.  Really, not one shit.   "