:The fact that Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Humanism, and Constructivism are theories is not disputed.  The fact that educational philosophies might utilize Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Humanism, and Constructivism within them is not disputed.  The fact that you are asserting Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Humanism, and Constructivism are comprehensive educational philosophies (a specific term with a specific definition and meaning agreed upon by the educational philosophy community) is the fringe theory.  In other words, psychological theories (or even philosophies) might be part of an educational philosophy, but they are not its entirety. A mechanic does not equate the wheel on a car with "the car".  When someone says "I am going to buy a car" they do not mean "I am going to buy wheels for my car".  Likewise, educational philosophers (as demonstrated in the sources) do not equate cognitivism (one possible part of an educational philosophy) with an educational philosophy. The points you again raise here with have already been raised on the article's talk page, they have been roundly countered by the other editors, and, again, you have yet to convince four established Wikipedia editors that your edits do not constituent fringe theories or original research.