::I felt that the horns of this bull needed to be grasped.  So much work has been done, and most of tghe current edits are rearranging deckchairs prettily, not large and substantive corrections.  Thanks for the correction.  I hope I have nominated it sufficiently well for people to be interested in coming and reading it. 

 ::I also feel that a full peer review will satisfy many of the objections expressed by  and will also allow a certain amount of deletion-proofing by those who seem to think that "havng an article at all" gives credence to the demolitionists.  My own view is that the conspiracy is a heap of junk, but that makes me the more determined to have a decent, well documented, and balanced article on it.