I see, months later, wikipedian Hughcharlesparker decided this article was a "rant" and cut it out.  [ Hughcharlesparker (Talk | contribs) (→Articles - removing the first link - it's not an article in any sort of reputable journal, it's someone's rant. WP:RS) ] Apparently Hughcharlesparker had not read this section of the Talk page.  And he did not first discuss its removal here.  Worse, his history comment reveals a definite bias as his reason for removing the article  he calls it a "rant," for example.  Therefore, I restored the link.