==One word: Pathetic== 
 Pathetic, as one person wrote: 

 :“All men who hold position do not abuse its privileges, and the man who serves...humbly and faithfully never will, for the moment he yielded to the temptation so to do, that moment would he cease to serve [his fellow wikipedians]; but there are many, alas! who sadly misuse the functions of their office, and prostitute every power and privilege to the gratification of self and the injury and embarrassment of their fellow men. It is dangerous to put some men into power. They swell up and become so distended with the ideas of their greatness and importance, that we are forcibly reminded of so many inflated toy balloons, which the slightest prick of a pin would burst and ruin forever. A very small office and a very little authority is sufficient to intoxicate some men and render them entirely unfit for duty.” 

 Thank God wikipedia has your good will and judgment to be protect them!  I find maternal volunteer copyright police such as yourself misguided and who "prostitute every power and privilege to the gratification of self and the injury and embarrassment of their fellow men." 

 It really isn't about protecting wikipedia, is it?  It is about you exerting your own will against others, and the empty satisfaction that you get from such power trips.  Obviously, your immature, unwelcome, unneeded, and intrusive edits show that they should have an age limit to giving someone admin status. Pathetic. 

 So how did it feel when I changed your wikipage?  I hope you had the same anger and disgust that I felt toward your heavy handed edits.  Please don't waste my time explaining how you are protecting wikipedia from copyright violations, I have heard it all before (but I know this is not the last time I heard from you).  Pathetic.