::Okay, I listened to the sermon again. Kennedy cites Behe's findings and statements, and a little more than halfway through, Kennedy points out that Behe never claims to be a Creationist.  Gosh.  Now, why would he point that out if he were a supporter of ID?  See, what is obviously going on here is that Kennedy and IDers like Behe are using the same evidence, but are drawing different conclusions which aren't identical. Kennedy sees the evidence as backing up his Creationist beliefs (e.g. 6 literal days, animals and humans made "as is"). Kennedy may use the same evidence as Behe, but that does not make him an IDer by any stretch of the imagination.