== re-discuss merger == 

 So, about three weeks on and nobody has done the merge. I myself do not plan to do it as I do not think it is a good idea. The mention of the individual cases is one thing, but the bulk of the article is written like an essay and is unsourced, therefore I do not believe it should be merged at all. And this title is an implausible search term, so leaving a redirect behind seems unhelpful as well. I'm thinking of taking this back to AFD, as it is unlikely that the users who worked to make the merge target article halfway decent want this garbage dumped on them, and as far as I can see there has been no discussion at that page's talk page of this merge.