Well, reverts back and forth are usually an indication that there is a need to discuss matters.  I thought your changes to the lead paragraph were an interesting way of approaching the subject (my own personal view).  However, some of your other changes were problematic.  For example, you said: 
 :It is a popular misconception that Taoism itself divides into the philosophical schools and the religious sects (Taochiao). This misconcpetion is based off a later writer who merely used the two terms in order to order the descriptions. 

 A popular misconception is an important thing to write about, but tricky, so sources would be helpful, (this is an encyclopedia, after all).   In the second sentence you refer to a "later writer."  Who?   June 28, 2005 19:36 (UTC)