Thank you for taking the time to review my page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alok_Nanda_%26_Company_Communications_Pvt._Ltd.) 

 I was hoping you could shed some light on your feedback.  

 'refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources': My sources include CNBC, Forbes India and Economic Times. Since the subject is an Indian advertising firm, I've also included sources like CampaignIndia and Afaqs, that are known and respected by the Indian advertising community. Could you specify why these sources are unacceptable so that I may improve my article? 

 'This submission appears to read more like an advertisement...articles need to be written from a neutral point of view': I have avoided what might be considered as 'peacock terms'; there are, however a few instances where I've used words taken directly from sources. For instance: 'India is the fastest-growing luxury market' from CNBC.com. Do you object to words/phrases like these or is there something else you'd like me to change? 

 I'd appreciate your help.