== about the fucking notability bullshit == 

 are you fucking blind? you cannot judge it yourself? and you're an admin ffs! 

 :Basically, I'm going to ignore you until you a) stop being rude; b) Tell me what article you are talking about.    

 you know which article i'm talking about. plus, Don't be a dick  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 :No, anonymous user, I didn't know what article you were talking about, as you didn't tell me what article you were talking about. So, something to do with a Tetris clone then? Is this the one that quite clearly doesn't pass Wikipedia's WP:Notability guidelines? Plus, Wikipedia:No personal attacks. And you're still being rude.    

 being annoying makes ppl angry, not rude. now you know which one. i read all of it. it can be added.    
 :Glad to hear it, can you show me where the game has received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and perhaps we can add it to the list.    

 the sources are reliable. independent of the subject?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 ("Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.) there are articles that have text from those.    

 so?    
 :I've had to backtrack to work out which reference you mean. Do you mean Retro remakes? It's not significant coverage (See Wikipedia:Notability#_note-2; coverage needs to be more than a few sentences, as I've already mentioned.)    

 (are all examples of information that may not be evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation, despite their existence as reliable sources.) those are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 :What are? The retro remakes reference? It's difficult to know what you are talking about. To clarify: the examples I wikilinked to show a 360 page book (non-trivial; can be used) and a one-sentence mention (trivial; cannot be used.) The retroremakes reference is a two-sentence mention - it is trivial coverage.    

 i gave you everything you need and you can see it for yourself. the easter egg of μtorrent is trivial but it was included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 :Sorry, you've lost me. You've given me something? Where? Easter egg? I give in.    

 what?