== Deletion proposal == 

  proposed the deletion of this page with the reason: Non-notable target of spammy wikilinks. 

 I think this page is notable, and I think the arguments that were provided are not solid:  
 * "Nothing found in Google News archive": I found 7680 results (some of which are false positives), although it's admittedly relatively difficult to search for this company only because of the annoyingly common name. Most people just refer to the company as "RED". But it's possible with mostly accurate results: Google News: RED digital cinema camera "red epic" OR "red one" OR scarlet OR dragon -"red carpet".  
 :Result examples:  
 :*Ars Technica: Red Digital Cinema shows off dev kit to make its cameras app-controllable 
 :*Yahoo Movies: The 20 Biggest People and Innovations in Movies in the Last 20 Years 
 :*engadget: Live from the Engadget CES Stage: an interview with Red Digital Cinema's Ted Schilowitz 
 :*The Hollywood Reporter: Jim Jannard Steps Aside as Public Face of Red Digital Cameras 
 :*CNET: Red cameras encroach on Canon, Hasselblad turf 
 :These are mostly international, non-special-interest news sources with major audiences. cnet.com has an Alexa rank of 134 globally, for example. In my opinion, these press mentions alone make the company notable. 
 * "only passing mentions in Google Books": There are 248 books mentioning the company by the full name. Search. That's a significant number. True, no book has been written about the company as it seems, but it's quite young so that isn't surprising.  
 Generally, RED is one of four major digital camera manufacturers used in cinema today (the other ones are Arri, Sony and, to some extent, Canon). Movies such as The Social Network or The Hobbit were shot on RED cameras (more). I don't see why this isn't notable. — ✈ ()