::I'm glad that you and the anon user are trying to come to an agreement on language you both find acceptable.   I have been continuing to follow the edits myself.  Personally, I do not see a lot of difference between most of the language each of you seems to propose.  For whatever it is worth, I tend to agree with you that the phrase "may not ignore fundamental Catholic values in the exercise of their office" is a bit too POV.  However, I also have a problem with the language about Burke's actions worsening relations with the laity that were already strained by the sex abuse scandal.  I don't really see how the sex abuse scandal is directly relevant to the discussion.  Including it feels like a POV attempt to tie Burke to the scandal.  Perhaps it would be useful for any further discussion to occur at the article's talk page so other users can join in more easily and there can be a record of any consensus that is reached.  Thanks!