::Re. Karsh sucks. I agree, that is not an argument.  But it's quite an imaginative leap to say that the semantic content of  
 ::: (A) Karsh uses "propaganda techniques, attempting to insinuate that my criticisms of the Neoconservative clique in the Bush administration are somehow like believing in the forged 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 
 ::is the same as "Karsh sucks". (A) tries to show something about the structure Karsh's assertion. "Karsh sucks" says well, it says Karsh sucks.