:PamD: Your notability statements, which you've mentioned before related to these artworks I think is unproductive in general and specifically unhelpful here.  There are artworks on the grounds of the Indiana Statehouse that do have proper names, and they have been reflected in the SOS! survey and these article titles.  I would prefer if you would please either substantiate them here or elsewhere, or move on. 
 :Jonbod: this title does not make clear much at all.  As I said, this is not an entrance to the Statehouse, and these artworks are actually above the second floor of the building, so truly not not above an "entrance."  Yes, they are on the south side, and yes they are at the Statehouse. I continue to believe that the main purpose of an article title for artworks is to actually respect the name given by the artist(s) when known.  Absent of that known fact, the title should deal with the either the subject or artist; the location and owner are of tertiary importance.  However, I'm noticing a pattern in discussions with you in that it seems you'd prefer to believe your "winning" than actually consider the matter.  To this end, you can change the name to what you'd like.   
 :Absent of real research or opinions of others that have an historical background with the artworks at the Indiana Statehouse, that could help discover a more historically accurate name, I see little point in continuing on here.