*****It was not trolling.  It was a very serious attempt to shake this editor out of a destructive pattern which is hurting Wikipedia as an informational resource.  This editor has personally gutted the webcomics category.  This editor has instigated and/or argued for the deletion of dozens upon dozens of articles within that subject, most of which were patently notable by any fair measure.  But this editor has also worked very hard to manipulate the notability standards for webcomics into near-absurdity, to support a deletionist agenda.  This editor has particularly targetted articles on subjects which could be used as cites of notability (Comixpedia, Fleen, Digital Strips, WCCAs) for other webcomics articles on Wikipedia.  This editor has made a big point of appearing to be interested in improving the information available about webcomics on Wikipedia, but has in fact been systematically destroying as many articles as possible.  This editor plays the deletion game very well.  As a casual editor, I don't see that Wikipedia provides a functionally effective way to hold this editor accountable for the extensive damage they have caused, or to prevent them from causing further damage.  A thousand webcomics experts could walk in off the street and be unable to make this user stop destroying good articles.  So, the original comment was an appeal to the editor to reconsider the morality of their actions.  This editor appears to be beyond such an appeal.  This editor has destroyed a great deal of valuable information and seems likely to continue to do so.  So I am at a loss; I will leave.  But if Wikipedia is to survive, it must develop the capability to detect and disable behavior such as this editor has exhibited.   Reason