(UTC) 

 Would it not be more appropriate to say these expenses were incurred because individuals entered the military knowing the policy (part of the induction process, and prior to being sworn in), received training, food, clothing, shelter, and a full time job only to be either found out or "outing" themselves, resulting in separation?  
 An analogy would be blaming the necessary expense associated with a police vehicle and officer on a school-zone speed limit rather than the individuals who would IGNORE the limit. 
   21:25, 14 September 2008