==Scientific Speculation Section== 
 I have removed this section from the article and pasted it below for discussion, for the following reasons.  Essentially, it does not as it stands satisfy either notability or relevance, and it also contributes to a non-NPOV.   As the section notes, the discussed speculation was a 'thought experiment', not in any way a suggestion that an intelligent dinosaur descendant might have actually existed.  The speculation was not an attempt to explain mythological stories of reptilian humanoids nor an attempt to support fringe claims that such creatures actually exist.  Nor has this section shown that the speculation itself made any notable contribution to science or had a notable influence on sociology or culture with respect to the mythology, popular culture, or conspiracy theories of reptilian humanoids.  As it stands, this section also creates a misleading impression the there might be mainstream scientific support for the existence of reptilian humanoids.  This is a problem both in its violation of NPOV and in the fact that it would appear to be independent research or unwarranted synthesis.  I have pasted the removed section below to aid in discussion.  Since the image only makes sense in relation to this section, I have removed it and pasted it below as well.  If anyone can add additional references establishing notability and relevance, parts of the section could possibly be reincorporated into the article.  

  

 In a thought experiment published in 1982, paleontologist Dale Russell, curator of vertebrate fossils at the National Museum of Canada in Ottawa, conjectured that, had the dinosaurs not all perished in the K/T extinction event 65 million years ago, bipedal predators (theropods) which existed at that time, such as Troodon, would have evolved into intelligent beings similar in body plan to humans. Troodontids had semi-manipulative fingers, able to grasp and hold objects to a certain degree, and binocular vision. Like most dinosaurs of the troodontid family, this imaginary creature, which Russell called the "Dinosauroid", would have had large eyes and three fingers on each hand, one of which would have been partially opposed. As with most modern reptiles (and birds), its genitalia would have been internal. Russell speculated that it would have required a navel, as a placenta aids the development of a large brain case.  However, it would not have possessed mammary glands, and would have fed its young, as birds do, on regurgitated food. Its language would have sounded somewhat like bird song.Cosmos: Smartosarus Russell's fanciful speculation has been met with criticism from other paleontologists since the 1980s, many of whom point out that Russell's Dinosauroid is overly anthropomorphic. Gregory S. Paul (1988) and Thomas R. Holtz Jr., consider it "suspiciously human" (Paul, 1988) and argue that a large-brained, highly intelligent troodontid would retain a more standard theropod body plan, with a horizontal posture and long tail, and would probably manipulate objects with the snout and feet in the manner of a bird, rather than with human-like "hands". Turkish artist Nemo Ramjet has used these new approaches to the original thought experiment to re-interpret the Dinosauroid, going so far as to create "Dinosauroid cave art", which depicts sentient, tool-using troodontids and other dinosaurs and pterosaurs, painted using sticks and feathers.Art of the Dinosauroids (Nemo Ramjet)