I've sorted out the comments so that you don't have to read through the entire passage.  Here are both comments:   
 :::It is devoted to the subject of identifying and detaining those who contact people they believe to be underage (ages 12–15) over the Internet for sexual liaisons. Flyer22 (talk)  

 :::"It is devoted to impersonating underage youth (generally 12-15) and detaining adults who contact them over the Internet for sexual liaisons.". . ..94.200.27.54 (talk)   

 I thought it strange that the editor said he thought the question being raised was "so irrelevant" he didn't see the need to log-in.  However, I didn't question him about it until he concluded by using essentially the same language as Flyer22.  I'd already compromised on the wording , but when the IP then came back with the nearly identical language, I began to suspect that there was more to things than appeared.  This is what prompted me to ask you if it's okay for an editor to come in as an IP to comment.  In any event, this is not about having you referee any discussion.  It's just about identifying the IP.  I think he's either someone I know and has followed me before, or perhaps there's been some form of communication that has prompted his participation.  I don't think the IP came by casually.  Sorry for the trouble.  Thanks.