:::I do have suggestions for how to make it better.  The main one is to eliminate your ridiculous terminology that you can't even show any proof of a single person ever using anywhere outside of wikipedia.  You claim this terminology was agreed on after months of discussion but you can't show any demonstration of that and you can't find a single non-anonymous user to agree with you.  Nobody is reverting you "as punishment"; we are doing so because your edits are destructive to the wikipedia.  We don't want original research here and we especially don't want bad original research like this crap.  Stop pretending other editors have agreed upon these stupid neologisms.  Where is this proof you claim of these terms actually being used?  As I said, I have never seen them used before and I have been researching this topic for years.  Zeph you are wasting everyone's time.  Does anyone know how to complain about this user and initiate action that will lead to banning his IP?