, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 
 ::::Opposition to censorship is important, but this whole argument belies the notion that simply citing "NOTCENSORED" is sufficeint in and of itself.  Censorship occurs on Wikipedia... UNDUE/NPOV/RS/V/etc.  The question is why?  If the entirety of one's argument is NOT CENSORED, which we often see in various debates, then I contend that it often is not sufficeint-especially when rationale reasons have been presented for moving/removing/editing etc.-''' ' 17:43