::::::::::::::Bubbalah, I wrote five paragraphs and you opt to respond only the last one?  If you respoect WIkipedia and if you really want to work here, it is the first four paragraphs - the bulk of my message - that you should care about.  As for the fifth paragraph, I was expressing my views, but university-level researchers are a community with community-wide standards, so I was not expressing my personal point of view.  Limiting ourselves just to say the first four sentences of the video, it is not my personal opinion that it is silly - I am saying that it violates all the standards that the scholarly community expects of scholarly work.  I started watching with an entirely open mind (believe it or not) but it was the actual words that the narrator spoke that convinced me that this is a work not meant to be taken seriously by scholars.  If you wish to know what works meant to be taken seriously by scholars look like, read any of the books by well-respected scholars and published by respected academic presses, or articles in peer-reviewed journals, cited by the current Jesus article. 

 ::::::::::::::I have expressed NO personal beliefs or opinions about Jesus.  I told you that this is not what WP is for.  I am WARNING you NOW: if you put your views about Jesus on the Jesus talk page or any WP space, you risk being blocked again.  The purpose of talk pages is to discuss improvements to the article: to assess the significance of views and the reliability of scholars.  It is NOT for you to use as a soap-box    |