== Kashoo marked for deletion? == 

 Hello Armburst, 

 I am writing to inquire about specific reasons why the company I have written an article about has been nominated for quick deletion. The company called Kashoo is a fairly new but very relevant for a number of reasons. One of them being that they have created an open source project at their core. This project uses reflection and dependency injection and is way out on the front of what is happening in Java development. They are the very first (and only) Facelets-like implementation for GWT. I tried to point this out in the article but maybe it was not seen as significant because there is a lack of understanding about software development? 

 As a caveat, I run my own company (beloud.ca) and use this product. I chose to write an article about them on Wikipedia after noting that they were not included in the comparison of accounting software (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_accounting_software). In order to have them listed in this list I was told that I needed to make an article. I followed the guidelines the best I could and had my first attempts deleted immediately. I created this article on the discussion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kashoo) so that I may have a discussion about how to improve the article in order to get it included. I have not received comments or discussion and just default note quick deletion. 

 I have outlined the open source component that makes this company relevant (not to mention they are an emerging market leader in a newly defined area of SaaS). And I have also linked to articles from non-trivial sources (Google, Yahoo and Business Week). What is wrong with my approach? These guys have been so great to me I really think they should be included in the comparison of accounting software. I would also like to note that after auditing the other companies included in this list, comparing accounting software, there are at the very least 26 companies that fall short of even the simplest criteria you lay fourth - how is it that they are included? 

 I would really appreciate any advice or help you could give to get this article listed. 

 Thanks very much for taking the time. 

 Best regards, 

 Christopher. 

 Here is a list Wiki articles on accounting software companies that fall short of the criteria laid out to me. Some of them are extremely blatant with no referencing articles at all and others with self referential material: 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AccountsPortal 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACCPAC 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acumatica 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acumatica 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Accounting 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIG4books 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comarch 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EasyAs_Accounting_Software 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FirstOffice 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FinanceToGo 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortora_Fresh_Finance 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HansaWorld 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Office_Accounting 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locbook 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Dynamics_SL 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_Accounting 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softline_Pastel 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peachtree_Accounting 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_E-Business_Suite 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pos_solutions 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar_Accounting 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Wing_Software 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tally_Solutions 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAVERSE_%28software%29 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubikwiti 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xero_%28software%29