===comments edited from above=== 
 Please reconsider... 
 :obviously completely inappropriate...  
 :::"Long term abuse"...bureaucratic bullshit aside... 
 ::::definition of 'long term abuse'...'long term misconduct'...'long term pattern of abuse'  

 ::Totally inappropriate response...inacceptable use of language...long-term abuse...personal attack...precise statement of fact...not supported by any evidence whatsoever.   
 :::try saying what he wrote to someone in a white collar workplace, school, university, etc.   
 ::::strong language...than immortalising seriously false accusations...one of our top contributors ...the principle of immediate grounding (through swearing) of static electricity before it accumulates to a dangerous level (BS)...tool-bearing Randy.   
 :::::It is comical and sad to see anyone arguing about the precise wording in a block summary regarding an editor with a long term history of deliberately insulting and abusive commentary. Malleus's "contributions" at Rfa talk have provided ZERO improvements to the Rfa process and if anything, have driven others to avoid the page so as they can avoid his behavior. The reason he keeps getting blocked or nearly blocked is because his commentary warrants it...it really is that simple.  
 :...for taking assertive action. Its time more admins. stood up for the rights of all rather than fawning over their idols. Don't be discouraged when someone who thinks they've got a bigger stick than you unblocks him. Action is required to in the interest of all editors in good standing, not just those who swear blind allegiance to great content writers.