"== WP:CVUA == 

 You have any plan to encourage more senior editors to join as a trainer in the CVUA? Cheers! ''''''  
 :I don't think it's something the more 'senior' editors are interested in. They've generally moved on to Wikipedia's real life meetings and conferences or giving talks and lectures in schools and colleges or negotiating with the WMF for new software solutions, or become 'crats or Arbcom members. Enthusiastic younger editors are usually quite good at the CVU kind of thing as long as it doesn't turn into the 8th Graders' social party that we had to put a stop to 3 years ago!    
 :Perhaps one way to get more CVUA teachers would be to see who posts regularly and accurately at AIV and offer them a job.    

 == Thanks Chris! == 
 I rarely ask someone not to post on my T/P, but the arrogance was insupportable. I am only human I fear. An excellent call. Regards, Simon.    
 :You're welcome )    

 == On granting a certain user PCR... == 

 Hi Kudpung. 

 I've recently been helping out a bit at WP:RFPP (as you know, I recently became an admin). There's a certain user, William2001, who is requesting the PCR permission. I'm leaning toward declining the request, but I would like your opinion. Although they seem to technically meet the requirement at WP:RVW (albeit narrowly), I do have some concerns. For instance, on his user page he displays a ""Veteran Editor"" service badge, when in fact he is not close to meeting the requirements for that. (Not even I do.) Secondly, he displays the CVU badge on his userpage, although I can't find any indication that he ever went through the program. I'm a bit uncomfortable with that, since it may indicate hat collecting. His editing history is also quite sparse as of late (only about 50 edits going back to April or so). I see that you've posted on this user's talk before, mostly about AfC and how you thought he was too inexperienced for the job. However, since it's been a few months from then, do you think he would be ready for this permission?   
 ::Never mind; Beeblebrox granted the request.   

 == 's abuse of Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes on Panther tank == 

 Apparently  did not read or understand the constructive edits of  and, instead,  semi-protected Panther tank under the false pretense of including communication in the edit summaries (which, per definition, are communication, as telling something, and very desired), and by doing so,  abused Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes and thus undermined the removal of logical errors, repetitions, and prolix descriptions from the page's lead, or, in other words, its constructive development.   
 :What a load of rubbish. Has this troll been blocked yet?   

 == @Kudpung == 

 """" Funny, I consider your posturing and derogatory and often absurd generalized POVs against people and imagined groups they secretly belong to, to be vastly incongruous w/ and poisonous to both the spirit & letter of this project. You left WP:Editor retention, right, and threw around blame, of not only the monitor editor there, but also imagined hawks buzzing about just waiting to add disruptive comments. You go around dis-inviting editors off the WP. (Who the hell do you think yo