I had seen the Bennett item and did not use it because it is WP:Tertiary source. However, the reference you suggest to Whealey does not belong in this section at all, given that Bennett states that Whealey "concludes in favor of the authenticity" of the Testimonium. Although Whealey can be used as a source in the other section in favor of authenticity, why bother with her, given that she is an also-ran in scholarship, and there are far better sources than that to argue for authenticity. Again, I am sorry, but I am not at all, not at all sure what we are talking about here, given that you are now mentioning modern sources "in favor of authenticity", in a section that is about sources "against authenticity".