Hmmm... archiving according to topic might be workable, but to be honest my guess is still that so much of it is irrelevant to the article as it now stands that I'm not sure even that I agree with. 

 :::Thanks for appreciating my comments. )  I do appreciate your contributions to this article, too. 

 :::I just want to say I've got a really busy week ahead, and I'm about to go to bed, so I'm afraid I don't really have time to respond to your comments.  I do think, though, that all content relevant to an encyclopedia - including notable arguments for and against (given appropriate weight according to the weight of published literature - given the fact that mainstream scholarship regards the question as settled, that'll probably lead to greater arguments pro the myth as other scholars don't bother with it.)  But I don't have time really to think properly about your comments right now, to be honest - sorry! 

 :::It's a shame that I'm having such a busy week just when we were beginning to get somewhere on this article!