" 

 ==Jaap van Ginneken== 
 Hallo Jarkeld, 

 The article i submitted (Jaap van Ginneken) is declined because of unreliable sources. I should view the submission to see the comments left by the reviewer and I should address the issues found in the review but i cannot find them. Or maybe i look at the wrong place? I gathered some information today and  now i understand why it is declined but could you more specific to help me further?   
 :Hi, I declined the article as it does not cite sources for the content. The sources need to be reliable third-party sources to ascertain the claims for notability. Preference is for the citations to be inline. If you have those sources available, please add them to the article and resubmit it for review. The relevant guidelines re: notability are found here and here.    

 == Jaap v g. == 

 i think you made me clear what to next. thank you very much.   

 == Merry Christmas!  == 

 70px|left 

  
 ™ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!     

 Spread the cheer by adding  to their talk page with a friendly message. 

 :May you have a very blessed Christmas and a Happy New Year! ™  

 == RE: Paul Christoforo == 

 Excuse me what? I count 18 'Contested Deletion' posts and only two that support it. Unless you've decided that IPs opinions don't count. Also since when is it okay to simply add tags without reason? Are you trying to imply that I can add a speedy delete tag to any article I please and it should be talked about for weeks? Explain.    
 :Those objections were against the speedy deletion, not against the AfD. Please read WP:AfD and WP:CSD to find out about the differences.    
 ::Again, it doesn't meat the criteria. If you bothered to read any of the 'contested deletion' posts, you'd see that the consensus is NOT to delete it, and the make valid points. This is a developing story that has been on MSNBC for cripes sake. How long should I wait before actually listening to consensus and removing the tag? A day? A week? A month? Or do you insist we should waste more time on what is trivially a bad tag.    
 :::The criteria are different. The comments on the talkpage are not relevant to the AfD discussion. If you'd bothered to read the links properly you'd be aware of that. Removing teh template once again constitutes vandalism, as you have been notified not to remove it while the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Christoforo is still open.    

 == CRAZY GIRL SHIN BIA == 

 Have just found a third source, myanimelist.net, for information on the manhwa CRAZY GIRL SHIN BIA.  If you wish to see the entry on it for yourself, go to myanimelist.net/manga.php?id=12837.    
 :User added content: not a reliable source.    
 Thererfore, I went and found a FOURTH source, www.mangatraders.com; the entry is www.mangatraders.com/manga/series/5390. ([[User