::I also don't like it...  Bruce is a great resource, and could be a phenomenal editor if he learned to take his historian hat off.  It's hard, since many of us would like to share more of our expertise, but as I say all the time, Wikipedia is detached, boring, old, and dead.  At least you have to approach it that way if you're personally inclined to be progressive, original, innovative, and lively.  There are many like Bruce who don't transition well to this form, since in some ways it's just beneath them.  I'd rather not see an RFC/U since they tend to get ugly, but maybe Bruce can get the gist just from discussing things here, that as good as his research is, it doesn't really fit well into our existing mechanisms for verification and sourcing.  I'm going to encourage again that Bruce write a really thorough original article in userspace or paperspace, and then submit it somewhere so we can use it as a source later on.  Until then, this approach probably won't work.