applied to the main list. 
 :I agree about your inflation related questions. The list is basically just a copy of the one in Forbes (linked to at the start of the list). So whatever information Forbes provided about their calculations are what we have.   

 ::You're right about the sources but your reasoning is unfair, Qutezuce. The Lord of the Rings film should be considered as a package (as Grutness says) even though it was released in three parts. If we were to use your criteria, then War and Peace's figures would be different in the "inflation-adjusted list" as this classic film was released in four parts during the 60's. There might be other movies in the lists which were released in more than one part and are being considered as a whole. 
 ::I suggest that the Lord of the Rings film trilogy be considered as a whole, the same as War and Peace. The fact that "separate figures for the three are known" wouldn't make any difference (there's no reason to believe that separate figures for the four parts of War and Peace are impossible to reckon). 
 ::If these changes are done, The Lord of the Rings film trilogy would be in first place in the "not adjusted for inflation list" with $280.000.000. I feel my arguments are strong enough to do this edition - otherwise