:I was one of the many anonymous reviewers of "Recursive Fury" while the article was still embargoed. I have surrendered that anonymity because of the many falsehoods being spewed by denialists and disavowers regarding the article and why the journal "retracted" it. As noted above, #1 the journal did not "retract" the article: the article was removed from the web site for economic reasons; and #2, neither I or anyone else that I am aware of have been able to find any major flaws in "Recursive Fury." The baseless opinion that the paper is "absurd" is absurd. The article stands unimpeached, and is a fine reference for this Wikipedia article. If anyone thinks otherwise, I encourage that person to write a paper on the subject and submit it to a science journal for peer review and publication.