:Most importantly, his statement doesn't say whether the lack of coverage is because of a general policy decision or simply because they dropped their only boxer: him. 
 :A secondary issue is that for his image, he of course has an interest in portraying it as a general policy decision completely independent of his performance, and he's also accusing the BBC of racism and being run by "anti-boxing" people, so his comments (in a tabloid) aren't exactly unbiased.  (One could also wonder how the BBC offered him a new contract as a presenter if there wasn't going to be any boxing on the BBC.  Maybe they wanted him to read the news or give his insights into football?) 

 :So, since I'd read the two referenced articles, both twice, I'd decided a revert was justified, but I find reverting very rude so I tried to word my objections as questions to show that I'm not tied to any version of the article, just looking for things to be referenced.  I also wanted you to get a notification so you could react.