== Reversions == 

 I recently reverted a series of edits. I'm concerned because I thought that we were on the same page: the article needs independent, reliable, third-party sources. The edits in question elaborated at great length on Young's claims as if they were fact, relying heavily on promotional sources directly affiliated with Young. I'd like to take these one at a time and discuss whether the sourcing is appropriate, rather than throwing a huge chunk of text into the article rehashing (devoid of context) Young's claims. Where should we start? ''''''