::::Where did I bring up WP:LEAD?  I would be happy to talk about LEAD if you so desire, but I should warn you in advance, I may fill your entire talk page up with my comments.  You say you find my analysis false, yet you ignore what I've said.  Where is the accusation explained in your version?  It isn't.  Your version says that Wilson interrupted the speech with a comment.  My version says he interrupted the speech with an accusation.  I'm not committed to "calling him a liar", as that can be further refined in several ways; For example, one could say that Wilson "accused Obama of lying", etc.  But simpy blurting out "You lie!" doesn't tell the reader anything important, and as I've argued above, cheats the reader out of important information.  Wilson isn't actually known for his comments, which is why the quote isn't important.  If he said something notable or unique, or even strange or informative, then yes, we would keep the quote.  But that's not the case here.  Wilson is known for calling the President a liar.  This idea that the statement "You lie!" is somehow notable, appears to be a Republican talking point, not a fact.  Most people know Wilson for simply making an accusation, not for those two words, and the reliable sources make this very clear.  The existence of You Lie! shows that there is an effort by some to glamorize those two words, and your edit appears to further their cause.    Wilson called the president a liar, or Wilson accused the president of lying - either one is acceptable.  But simply saying he interrupted the speech with "You Lie" misses the mark and robs the reader of the broader context.  We need to write articles for people who know nothing about the topic.  If someone was to read the current version, that Wilson interrupted Obama's speech with "You lie", what exactly would that mean to them?  Ask yourself that.  To me, it is extremely poor writing, and fails to mention what actually happened.  Those two words are not notable.  What is notable is Wilson's accusation and the fact that he called the president a liar.  The lead needs to state that fact in unambiguous terms.