::I can understand that you would hesitate to include one journalist's conclusion, but it is worth noting that the trials and court decisions in favor of Providence against the media mentioned by Moon Il Seong are all confirmed by the article posted on MJKNews (also provided here in English), as well as this article posted on Jeong Gyeong News. "Jung Myung-Seok may have been railroaded" might sound like an editorial styled conclusion, but it is a fact that both he and other journalists concluded that his trial may have been unfair, and mentioning that fact would give the readers some hint as to why Jung's final trial, or this article for that matter, could be considered controversial. Even if we choose not to include that fact, we should at least acknowledge that Providence church won a defamation court case against one of the 3 major Korean News broadcast companies, and that several others court cases have been dropped (a fact mentioned in the Jeong Gyeong News article and the article on MJKNews). That court decision was the conclusion of the Korean court's judges - not an editor or journalist. If you as editors decide to exclude those facts and intentionally decide not to acknowledge the existence of his other trials, when multiple valid sources have been provided, then you risk taking sides by omitting the existence of one side, thus making this article a one-sided biased article, even if you do so with the intention presenting only un-biased information.