::I am as equally baffled as you seem to be. I stand by what I said and I have no idea where you are getting this from. I read word for word, line by line, and what I say is true: its identical. The only exception is one word (I restored "converted" (which was lost ealier) from  
 "prevailed." That is not a biggie. The rest is identical. What you reverted to, is identical to what I re-inserted. No difference. The only difference between what you did (not trusting me), and what I did, was that I only affected the two main sections that the anon IP clearly put in that I knew to be old versions, but did not alter any of the rest of the article (the reason why I bought it to the talk page's attention), whereas you reverted the whole article, and then went back and incorporated the edits you saw were legitimate or worthy.