== External links problems == 

 I'm rather confused by what is meant by much of what is in the External Links section.  By "Liberal point of view" and "Conservative point of view", are we claiming merely that the site argues for that position, or that the site is actively run by those of that particular political bent?  Because Media Matters self-describes as progressive.  Hmm, a quick check on self-description: 
 *Media Matters:  self-describes progressive. 
 *FAIR:  self-describes progressive. 
 *Bartcop:  couldn't find any explicit self-description. 
 *Media Research Center:  self-describes conservative. 
 *Fairpress.org:  couldn't find any explicit self-description. 
 *Raptureready.com:  does not self-describe politically.  (Furthermore, why the hell are we using this as a source??) 
 *Dartmouth.edu link:  link broken.  Can anyone fix this? 
 So out of all these sites, we have one self-described conservative site and zero self-described liberal sites.  Whatever our opinions may be about what the leanings of these sites might really be, it seems to be original research for us to unsupportedly claim they are presenting those viewpoints without outside attribution.   

 Also, it is claimed that certain links have "purportedly" shown bias.  This is confusing on two levels:  Who has made the allegation of bias (ie., was the claimant a reliable source)?   And are the linked sites being accused of being biased, or are we saying they report on bias in others?  Because the link to fair.org under "Purported pro-Israel bias" is to a fair.org article claiming pro-Israel bias in the rest of the media - but the simplistic heading "Purported pro-Israel bias" could lead the reader to mistakenly believe fair.org itself is accused of pro-Israel bias. 

 Am I alone in thinking this section needs work?   

 In any case, it is important that in our efforts to chronicle this phenomenon, we  avoid being sucked into the one-dimensional left/right political frame that pervades the corporate media structure.  There are many more dimensions and angles from which we can reflect on this issue, and we are not restricted to the same elementary script as the TV hairdos.