:...and please communicate what the seminars are about in the inital sentences.  Saying it "led" to capitalized terms not defined in the lead still leaves a neutral reader lost.  Clicking links is great for further perspective, but an encylopedic article should be self-contained insofaras what the heck it's about and I, at least, still have no idea (well, I do, but not from the words of that lead yet). As to above disagreement, I might be missing a step but it looks like Lsi John was bold, Smee reverted, so now we discuss.  The bold wasn't wrong, the revert wasn't wrong, further reverts would be.  Agree, not agree?