:216.190.135.175 recently re-added the logo with an edit summary of: (That logo was in fact used on KTXH for a couple of days.) Okay. However, a) is a logo used for only "a couple of days" notable enough to be in the article, especially when b) it is fundamentally essentially a 2D version of another logo that's in 3D but otherwise the same? I'd like your opinions on this!