April 2015 (UTC) 
 ::::::::: I've thought about it, and I believe you are right.  This really isn't a case of a false accusation in the legal sense, insofar as Jackie went to the police and gave them a name of a real student on campus and pressed charges.  So I see where you are coming from.  If you think it should be changed back, I won't put up an argument.  I WILL say however, that I feel the article still does not go far enough in making it clear that yes, although the article is retracted/bullshit/whatever, the reason it's retracted is because this girl fabricated a story that had some very serious consequences.  Rolling Stone didn't fabricate the story out of thin air.  And I read what you wrote earlier - It's not about her being a "lying bitch", it's about the fact that everyone wants to pile on Rolling Stone without looking at the real reason for this whole mess.   02:39, 9