Yes, it clearly is difficult for you to know where to start with this, because my criticism of Wikipedia editors has obvious touched a nerve with you personally, and any dispassionate reader of your diatribe will know that you are writing in a state of obvious incandescent anger. Clearly writing is NOT your profession. 

 If you believe so strongly that Wikipedia's editors have anonymity, how do you know that the majority of Wikipedia editors are students? Statistics? References?  

 You confuse my criticism of dodgy editing with the section itself and you have not thought it through, since you have no justification to remove it and doing so is tantamount to vandalism.  Here's why.  Murphy has gone on the record in Broadcast Magazine and The Guardian about his sexuality. I have no personal feelings about that. I don't even think his announcement is brave because millions of others have done the same and have been quoted in Wikipedia.  My quoting Murphy's announcement of his homosexuality is not "an allegation" and to use such an emotive word displays your homophobia.  

 And finally your threat - because that is what it is - about my adding a controversy section: "You will be wasting your time" is pathetic and ties in with all the comments I make above about bullying. And it is here and on the record for all to see.  I am reverting.