:::Whenever you did any research that was relevant, I did my best to actually accomodate it, finding it a place in the article.  This is precisely what we're supposed to be doing here.  Unfortunately, you have significant limitations in your understanding of these matters and you have a hostile attitude that has made it pointless to try to explain anything to you.  Instead, I wind up repeating myself while you very convincingly play dumb; or perhaps it's not an act.  As it stands, your own personal version of this article sucks and part of doing the right thing is to keep your sucky article away from Wikipedia.  That's why I'm going to once again look for any changes worth salvaging, then throw away the rest.  The bottom line is that your'e biased, unknowledgable and a crappy writer.  Your input, like anyone else's, may occasionally be of value, but your output is worthless.  So go whine and cry to everyone that I'm bullying you and that I'm a vandal, but the fact remains is that you'd turn this article to garbage if allowed to.  I've documented your hatred of all things Dennett, so no attempt by you to pretend to be the injured party is going to fool anyone willing to do even the most basic research.