== For the record == 

 Just to let you know that in the Mitt Romney presidential campaign article I have noted your two reverts on a relevant citation from The Telegraph here  and here . I was surprised to see you revert it that second time, as when I reinstated it I'd written in the edit summary that the relevant part of the story was "in summary at end": i.e., where the Telegraph story says: 

  

 I'm sorry I didn't indicate this more clearly, and perhaps you didn't get beyond the headline and the first paragraph of the story. I'm not going to reinstate it again, since it's not absolutely crucial that the citation goes in - though it demonstrates how even the UK's most right-wing quality paper has reported Romney's handling of the Olympic question. But I want you to be quite aware that I was, and am, acting in good faith since we shall no doubt have to collaborate on this and other articles.