Aside from the fact that the post in question is inaccurate and is a synthesis of different statements, contexts and ideas found on different pages of the source document. The source does not meet Wiki reliability guidelines WP:RELIABILITY 
 *"Articles should rely on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we only publish the opinions of reliable authors."  
 *An individual extremist or fringe source may be entirely excluded if there is no independent evidence that it is prominent enough for mention." Is there any independant source to support.