:I think there is some discrepancy over what is considered "balance" with specific regard to BLP policy. In one regard you want to ensure negative aspects do not overshadow the article (i.e. that criticisms do not make up a disproportionate amount of content in an article). The second aspect  regarding balance is the relevance of the criticism. WP:BLP states that if the criticism is held by a "tiny minority" (in this case a single individual expressing their opinion) it "should not be included at all". The balance in this regard is equating the single Maliszewski opinion piece to the accolades reported independently by The Boston Globe, The New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times. among others. This is not to say that there can never be criticism noted in the article, simply that equating one individual's minority opinion to a large and varied coverage of accolades is unbalanced - it is given undue relevance to Paul Maliszewski's opinion.