" 

 == Various problems == 

 I have several concerns with this edit. 

 First, I think it is still appropriate to state that he was held in extrajudicial detention, even if his detention was ruled illegal in December 2009.  If his detention was ruled illegal in December 2009, he still spent all but the last seven months in Guantanamo in extrajudicial detention.  So the article should make clear that even prior to his detention being declared illegal, he was being held in extrajudicial detention.  When OJ Simpson was acquitted of murder we did not remove from his article that he had been charged with murder.  We don't, in general, remove all references to earlier charges, earlier status, even when subsequent events supercede the earlier information.  To do so would be an ""Orwellian"", rewriting of history. 

 The assertion that his detention was ruled ""illegal"" requires at least one WP:RS reference. 

 The paragraph that lists how long he has been held in Guantanamo does not comply with the discussion over paragraphs like this from WP:Help desk, in January, 2010. 

 WRT this edit 
 removes the image of the trailer where CSR Tribunals were held  with no explanation.  I do not believe the contributor who removed this image thinks they can point to a consensus for removing this image.  There is no consensus for removing this image.   

 The image had a caption, which I drafted.  The contributor who excised the image had concerns with that caption.  The image has been widely used.  And, initially, those instances used a caption I drafted.  The contributor who removed the image initially replaced my caption with a briefer, alternate caption. 

 I don't own the image, or the caption.  Neither does the contributor who had concerns with the caption I supplied.  Unfortunately, the caption they supplied was (1) inaccurated; (2) unreferenced.  So I reverted their briefer, alternate captions with the original accurate and referenced caption.  I have no problem engaging in a collegial discussion over what the ultimate caption for this image should be.  I have told the contributor who removed the image this, many times. 

 I do not believe that simply removing the image, without explanation, is a valid, collegial alternative to engaging in a civil dialogue over the wording of the caption.   

 Since there have been at least four kinds of reviews of the captives' status I don't know why this edit would remove ""Tribunal"" from the heading.  I don't think this is helpful. 

 This edit replaced the passage  
 {| class=""wikitable"" 
 | 
 :Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the Geneva Conventions to captives from the war on terror. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct competent tribunals to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of prisoner of war status.  

 :Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were lawful combatants  rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an enemy combatant. 
 |} 
 with  

  
 I drafted the original wording of this section.  But I don't ""own"" it, nor would I claim to own it.  I do think I am entitled to raise concerns about its replacement with other wording, without being accused of ""WP:Ownership"". 

 This new wording does not have links to several important related articles, the old wording linked to: 
 *Geneva Conventions  
 *the war on terror 
 *competent tribunal 
 *prisoner of war 
 No explanation has been offered as to why the original wording needed replacement. 
 No explanation has been offered as to why the new wording does not link to these important related articles. 

 Further, the new wording misinterprets existing WP:RS by stating that Said Muhammed's CSR Tribunal was held ""betweeen July 2004 and July 2007.""  
 For most captives we know when their Summary of Evidence mem