:::It would also be a BLP issue labeling a wide range of scholars from Conquest to Wheatcroft and Tauger as "denilaists". 

 ==Lead== 
 Saying that "Holodomor denial is denying holodomor" is a tautology. The term is self-explanatory and does not have to be defined unless someone wants to expand the scope and label those who disagree with this being a genocide denialists as well. The latter is questionable. 

 I also removed the 7 mln pushed by Horlo as unquestionable fact. Not a single modern scholarly source published since opening of archival data, including the research by Ukrainian historians and demographers, gives a number higher than 3.5 million. This is already covered elsewhere and does not need to be forked here. 

 The lead needs to clearly address the commonality (lack of) of the view that the famine is a fantasy. It is a single most important point that debunks the denialists like Tottle outright that this view does not have any standing. Clearly should be stated prominently. 

 Finally, the see also section is bad style per MoS and should be avoided in developed articles. Important issues should be linked from the main body and the similar topics are grouped with this one independently. This is why we have categories.