::::I have addressed your points.  You haven't supported your censorship at all.  You are making up standards for Wikipedia that you are selectively enforcing on this article without any reference to Wikipedia's actual rules and standards.  If you wish to make up new standards for Wikipedia articles, please seek consensus for those standards.  You also have not explained these standards  why are these particular experts invalid whereas the experts cited here already are valid?  Why is it invalid to include factual information about what Colin Powell reported to the Bush Administration about Feith?  Who decides what constitutes a "professional relationship with Feith" and why is Gaffney's history with Feith invalid under those terms?  Why is the Washington Post, Asia Times, or Arab News an invalid source?  You are enforcing a standard that you have totally made up and haven't even fully explained yet.  I suggest you think about what standard you think should be here, go to WP:V and WP:CITE and WP:BLP and argue your case for those standards on the talk pages, help develop a new consensus for your standard on those pages, and then come to pages like this to enforce the new standard.  Otherwise your deletions will continue to look like censorship and will continue to be reverted.