For the record, I'd like to point out that this user *did* explain why they were removing content from that article.  They deleted a section of the article that I had asked about on its talk page  I was suggesting that section should be deleted due to how long it was compared to its relevance - but I wasn't sure.  Well,  reverted the edit - understandable since it was a whole-section-delete - but then Aam49516 put the edit back, and provided an edit summary that says "deleted this section. Islam has no ties to extremism."  Well, I don't agree that Islam as a whole has no ties to extremism - Daesh/ISIS is extreme, (though of course I would agree that they aren't *really* Muslim, just like I'd argue that Christians who fight wars aren't *really* Christians, 'cause I'm a pacifist Christian and Jesus said love your enemies and all that...but I digress...)  Anyway, point is, Aam49516 did indeed explain his content removal.  So he shouldn't have been blocked.  IMHO.  However, it would have been helpful if you had responded to other editors, Aam49516.  Let's talk!