::::It doesn't say that, does it? It is dealing with the name and why is was adopted. That would have been important at some time in 1941 with Pecanac, Ljotic and others quickly jumping on the Nazi bandwagon. But your underlying point is a good one. The current theme-based structure sucks the big one. The whole thing should be chronological rather than thematic, then the changes in name and (marginal) resistance and collaboration can all just be laid out in a sensible order when they happened (ie that follows the progress of WWII). Perhaps the discussions of the name should be put in a separate section?