Dear Abductive, on 5 Sept 09 you removed the link (and accompanying sentence) to Potentially all pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives that I'd added to Pairwise comparison because of WP: UNDUE. The first article was also removed by other editors because it failed notability. Recently, the article has been reinstated (notability has been satisfied - due to 6 recently published sources referring to the method discussed in the article). Hence do you still consider that WP: UNDUE disqualifies the first article from being referred to in the Pairwise comparison article? The first article describes a method that is 100% based on pairwise comparisons. That is, would you consider reversing your original judgement? (I have also raised this issue - in a more general sense - on the discussion page of the second article.)  Best wishes, Paul Hansen