" 
 :::That it doesn't list a copyright doesn't mean that it's not copyrighted.  The owner would need to specifically state that it may be used by others and to be clear, you yourself are not the owner, that board is, and that's assuming that you really were a board member (we can't just take people's word for it, no offense intended).  That board, or a representative of it could give WP permission to use the text via WP:DCM but at any rate, it doesn't matter.  It was unattributed WP:PLAGIARISM and that much information about those people doesn't belong in an article about a school for the same reason that Al Pacino's biography isn't found in the Scarface article.  It's the whole reason we have separate articles.  If those people are notable and warrant their own article, then the copyright issue can be addressed there. 

 :::Is this making sense? '''''' "