:::::Thank you for backing up on that claim.  Its much easier to address actual issues when one is not being personally attacked.  Now, about the subject of the article.  My concern here, and in the debate about the title, is with the attempt to define the subject of the article in a biased way.  If "war on women" is used as an attack meme in one direction, it seems perfectly fair to include a response from the other side pointing out that the meme is being inappropriately applied.  Additionally, looking at the sourcing of the article, we have a lot of agenda-driven left-wing sources, newspapers that have not endorsed a Republican presidential candidate in over 40 years, and so forth.  Are you suggesting that agenda-driven sources from one side of the spectrum are not appropriate as references for a Wikipedia article?