: Hi!  I haven't done a full review  more or less, the fact that that text was similar to that from another article made me want to leave a note so that the eventual reviewer would double-check that the text was not taken from another external copyrighted source. We should probably have a note on the talk page if it's just originally from that other Wikipedia article, sorry for the legal fuss, but that's just the result of our CC-BY-SA licensing here on the site. 
 : Due to time constraints I'm going to have to leave a full review for another editor, but a few quick things that may help a reviewer accept the article more quickly: 
 :* Whether the topic is found to meet our notability criteria will probably be the thing the reviewer is most keenly looking to see. That criteria will ask that the article have multiple references, each of which is reliable, in-depth, arm's length, and in the case of an organization like this, "not routine coverage."  Of the references you've provided (and thank you!), the Mercury News articles are likely to be key to the reviewer's judgement, do they talk about CMT SJ in detail, independently (interviews and obits tend to get discounted on this), and exceed more than routine calendar listings. I'm optimistic, but any sort of independent journalistic profile piece on CMT SJ you an list will make it easier for the reviewer to accept the article. 
 :* I don't immediately see text verbatim taken from other sources, but the reviewer will do more in the way of spot checks on that. 
 :* Minor stuff: I fixed a few spacing issues, and the "disambiguation needed" links for youone tip: we generally only link a particular term to its wikipedia article once, so I removed some of the extra links to Broadway theater. Best of luck!