" 

 :1) Much of the version you deleted was sourced. Yes, it uses a website for some stuff: the Indian government's website on Ayurveda. It also uses some scientific journal articles for other information. You apparently have not read it. 2) I don't see why we should be defaulting to your heavily abridged version. 3) Why aren't you using the article talkpage? It sounds as if you are CANVAS|canvassing. How are you contacting these people? I don't see you asking editors in your contributions.  |  -  "