:The section currently initially titled "Intro", currently titled "Dispute" (unless it gets renamed again) was a direct reply to the announcement of the survey, disputing my assertion that there was a need for a survey: Since "Dispute" did not sufficiently describe the content of the section, I re-named it to "Is there a dispute?", based on the first sentence RJII had written: "Is there even much of a dispute about the intro?" After it became clear that people were actually responding to RJII's objections and that a productive discussion was taking place, RJII took the extra step of re-arranging the sections so that the disucssion no longer made sense. I now have the opinion that disrupting discussion of this article is 's explicit intent.