" 

 == LinkSpam Query == 

 Hi! 
 #I've been away from Wikipedia for a long while and was following up a cryptic talk post on my page on the Oceanography article.  Checking the Talk:Oceanography Page, I see you reverted the talk page itself citing 'LinkSpam' (Good but new Term to me!), which were additional references placed in (the Talk) there by an editor who was obviously very busy in the article itself circa the 18th-22nd of last month.  The article itself shows no apparent reverts, so I was wondering what was up, why the Talk rv, et. al. I guess more to the point, isn't it more appropriate to strikeout said material, rather than deleting something from a Talk page (by reversion)? 
 #Do you know anything about why the 'globalize' template was added?  There appears to be no recent note in the talk, and I can't seem to find out who might have added it from the history. Well, I acted boldly and deleted it, as it detracted from the article and doesn't seem to serve any good end (Even after looking at the 'anit-bias' manifesto, as it were).  Looks like someone took the sole comment last August (in the talk) about wanting more input from New Zealand, and brewed up a tempest in a teapot. 
 : "