== Discussion of source quality == 
 I wanted to start a new section to discuss the quality of sources cited.  PeterEastern was right to comment that the CBS article I added to the intro was not a primary or secondary source but instead a tertiary source where a reporter is telling us what others have researched on the subject.  In reviewing the sources I don't know that we have a large range of really high quality sources.  Many appear to be news articles or other sources with no citations.  For example I don't think Guy Span's work on the subject should be given more weight than Slater's.  Snell's work on the subject has been discredited by other researchers who have shown factual errors in Snell's version of events.  Thus according to Wiki guidelines his work should be viewed as unreliable and only cited to show that he said X vs that X actually happened.   
 Thoughts, comments?