:::::Well that's very interesting. You posted after Nigelj but chose not to put the warning about "This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject" below that post which includes claptrap like "The political right has always fostered a kind of 'environmentalism' that is based on things like clamping down on litter in the street, and the 'environment' being something very pretty that middle class people enjoy a good family walk in, after a hearty Sunday lunch. To them, anything that is not open grouse moor or well-managed woodland looks bad". What's that got to do with improving the article? I take it that means that political rants are OK as long as you agree with them. In answer to the point made by 98.232.162.249 about their edits being reverted, the reason was that they were unsupported. If you want to add something or change something it needs to be in the citation that's already there or it needs a new citation that supports what you're saying.