::::As said, you have no arguments against kuzarim, and don't reply to the several arguments I made exposing the flaws in your assumptions, so this point is dead, and not worth arguing about. 
 ::::Read page 29. You'll miss the point if you do not twig that he is taking as an historical fact the legendary census at 2 Samuel 24:1-9. The figures there, according to normative demographic calculations, imply 5,000,000, i.e. probably ten times the figure for the dawn of the Ist millenium. In other words, Ostrer has no knowledge of historical demographics, which is a fundamental consideration in interpreting such data . That sort of simple flaw from citing unreliable primary documents while ignoring a century of scholarship is all over his book, which, on genetics, is quite interesting. Unfortunately, he has great difficulty in connecting the area he knows eruditely with history, like most genetic papers cited here. 
 ::::I asked you to explain how the Ostrer quote from the Jerusalem Post article, included in the article, got there, when that quote contradicts what Ostrer actually said in his book. You still haven't. Did you edit that in? You've just admitted it is an incorrect representation of his position. Why don't you fix it then? 
 ::::where does Ostrer in his book argue:'against possibility that such gene flow was substantial or large scale?.'