: First, I'm claiming it's a new argument. No one suggested the noble reason for the reduction was for this - and if they did it could have been discussed. Defamation attacks a person's reputation, the inclusion of just a name on this site cannot be defamation. But how is that discussed if this new issue was not raised. No Wikipedia lawyer came onto the site with this issue. All the arguments were something else. And they were all countered, but ignored, for the reasons stated above. It is more about winning to them - obviously not to me, because I have walked away from this article -  and probably Wikipedia; but I will give it time. (I have been involved with this article because I enjoyed it. Its illegitimate decimataion removed that).