==Animal Rights Lede== 

 Hi.   I kind of stumbled upon the 'Rights by claimants' portal today.  I've never noticed it before. I decided to edit the opening of the article on fetal rights and to refer to the articles on animal rights and plant rights as guides.  I left an explanation on the talk page.  Anyway, the formulation "Animal rights is the idea that..." struck me as strangely awkward until I saw your comment,  

 "The main problem is the statement "Animals are entitled to rights" as much of the debate has nothing to do with rights. Singer, for example, is not a rights advocate, and would deny that they exist."  

 Is the choice of words deliberate as a way to reflect that a rigorous consequentialist approach to ethics would not advocate rights at all (or at least not 'rights' as they're traditionally understood)?  If so, might it be better to say, "Animal rights theory is the idea that..."?