BTW - thanks for adding a notice asking noone but Viriditas to edit it - could you check that though? It's not my understanding that V wants to merge those two pages. For how long do you want people not to edit it? What happens if he does not, in fact, intend to merge these pages? Drug abuse right now is a POV rant about how drugs are bad. I think that's a problem. 
 :Well, according to his comments earlier, he agreed with the merger.  It makes sense to me to merge the two, because it's all the same stuff.  Of note, a page titled, "Drug Abuse", does give one the idea that the article would primarily document the negative consequences of drug use.  The intention is to separate the advocacy and adversity pages from the primary subject pages.  So, for example, the Drug page should point to the Substance abuse page, rather than contain any information specific to drug abuse.  It can also point to the Recreational drug use and Responsible drug use pages.  Just as we don't want the responsible drug use page to contain much in the way of anti-drug POV, we have to allow the same consideration for "drugs are bad" pages.  If we allow POV to clutter the primary articles, it makes them difficult to read and hard to find the factual information without getting lost in the argument.