== Notability and Importance == 

 It should be pointed out somewhere in general that the idea of notability for this book comes not from the matter of the book's ability to be competitive in the market, but rather that this book as an outside event has affected the public itself in some way that gives or gave this particular book's name, rather than it's owners, a significantly increased amount of publicity. There is a distinct lack of any objective unrelated information regarding this book, and the article makes no effort to establish any. According to the Association of American Publishers,    the book publishing industry nets sales of over $20 billion each year, currently. What market share does this particular book represent? and what group does the publisher of this book belong? Has this publisher any notability for other books? Is the publisher of this book a member of the American Publishers Association? Sources for articles are required to be reputible. On what criteria are the sources in this article based?   

 Books are known to be important by their impact on society at large, rather than the number of copies printed and sold. What known reputible Universities and Colleges use this book as a standard primer for education? Of the number of students in America alone, what percentage would you say have heard about this book, and on what basis do you form your opinion?   

 Articles about books generally speak a little bit about their content and always note the Publisher and Author, why is this book different? 

 Per the mentioning that this particular book has sold more than a million copies: How many other books have sold more than one million copies? What is the reliability of the single source that mentions this? I looked around on amazon.com and found no mention of this book among the Best Sellers lists, historically, or otherwise.   

 These questions are asked in good faith, and hope to improve the quality of this article. Questions like the above are asked of anyone who uses an encyclopedia regarding the reliability of its content. To quote from an encyclopedia on a report for students and professionals alike, is to give testimony that one fully believes its article as a source. I don't understand why these questions should be ignored, when they provide the author of the article the opportunity to make plain reasons why the public at large should trust the reliability of the encyclopedia. This article should strive to answer these questions rather than ignore them.