Recent Copy edit === 

 There are some POV concerns that the use of Wikipedia's voice of authority is being used to attempt to balance information in a non-encyclopedic manner by presenting ony directly equal space to both critcism of the church and the church's response using only primary examples in an overly POV manner to chop down a well sourced section far beyond what is being discussed on the talk page. So to adapt what has already there I would like to at least state what I don't have a problem with. I don't have a real problem with the Packer information NOT being it's own section. I don't have a problem with the full quotes being removed from the prose, HOWEVER as this is a publication of the printed statements of Mormon doctrine and I am seeing a use of primary source material as only mentioned in an opinion peice in Ensign from a church leader that I believe had a hand in writing. I would argue that we lose all such primary uses and we accept perfectly well referenced and cited secondary, published material with due weight. I do have a dispute with a good portion of what was excluded but I will look at how the section can be be adapted from that edit. Thanks.   

 =