"    

 :I'm reverting, but I'm not a machine... -)   

 ::You seemed to be as quick as one this evening.   

 == Quick Vand Question == 

 I did a bit of RC patrolling this evening, and I wondered about something.  When is the slate wiped clean for IPs, so when should you start again with the first warning?   

 :It depends. If it's a shared IP address (indicated on the talk page), then it's likely that many different users are using that specific address. If you think that a user is experimenting with Wikipedia for the first time, you may give him/her a first-level warning. But since you never really know if you're dealing with a new user in these cases, you have to use your intuition. 
 :For static IP addresses (one user per address), it's easier. Then you're dealing with the same user the whole time, so you only have to use the first warning once (the first time).   

 == This is Barnstar., == 

  
 This is the barn-star for you. Because You always do good work to fight with vandalism. Ahh, You said that you sent me message, but you didn't. Please Leave the message about Sandbox on My talk Page. Don't forget. Thanks. 
 , 00:58, 4 May 2006(UTC) 

 :Hi Daniel, thanks for the barnstar! Much appreciated.   

 ::Your welcome!! Also Thanks for message in my talk page..^^ , 05:34, 5 May 2006(UTC) 

 ==Meredy== 
 Sockpuppet adding links again .   

 :Thanks for letting me know. I reverted the changes and warned the user. Next time, you may want to use WP:AIV instead, because I'm not always here. Thanks again,   

 ==Reverting a page?== 
 I've noted that the webcasting page has lots of commercial links on it again.  How do you revert it? 

 :Help:Reverting contains information how you revert a page.   

 == What do you think? == 

 Take a look at Solar eclipse...I want to get rid of two more. You think the page has calmed down enough to give me a minute window to try again?   

 :Sure, go ahead.   

 ::You're doing a great job whacking the vandals on Solar eclipse -)   

 :::Thanks... but it's a pity that it is necessary.   
 ::::Yes. If any experienced editor with 1000 edits say - whatever I have ;-) - could block any anonymous IP from editing for 8 days, then the vandals would get bored pretty quickly. The loss of a few IP clones editing for a week would be much less damaging than the incessant junk on eg Solar, Newton and Haydn.   

 :::::Yes, but then the policy needs to be changed. I don't expect it to happen in the short term.   
 ::::::Most of time is in the long term.   

 :::::::You are right. -)   

 == Darfur Conflict Mistake == 

 Wha?  My apologies; this was certainly not my intention.  I'm using a public mac at the moment, and my patience is fading fast.  I'm hoping that my edits will still be used, though.  That particular paragraph had some rather glaring gramatical errors... it was painful to read. 

 :No worries, I fixed it and your edits are still integrated in the article. This is a known problem and is related to the article size.   

 ==  == 

 I think we should block him for good. He has so many vandal warnings and has been blocked temporarily so many times. Area code 563 was also vandalised, by him.  22:05, 5