the fist (^ "Out of Africa Revisited - 308 (5724): 921g - Science). This is not an article! Firstly do not have an author. This 'note' has about hundred words (1.11kb). In regarded context contains string ''"dispersing out of Africa 60,000 years ago has remained unresolved".  < Wording which by any mean can not suggest consensus in scientific community (or dominance of truth). 

 The "source" is listed as "This Week in Science" what prove is not an article but editorial foreword to other articles  
 * "tested alternative models" .. using (mt) DNA ..of Southeast Asian aboriginal populations" (10.1126/science.1113261) 
 * "mtDNA types among indigenous Andaman islanders" (10.1126/science.1109987) 
 Waste your $15 and verify it yourself for sly scam out-profiteering 14000$ per each MB in traffic to it for science.com. Completely {out of citation}. Even if context were supportive for wp.art. sentence, can not be considered "is" but as "was" since dated 6+ years ago (13 May 2005). If one blindly want to attach citation in context of replacement, future discoveries give a finger to replacement theory. Actually the considered in "Out of Africa Revisited"  Assian Islanders DNA now very contradict replacement; DNA sequencend from old finger bone show: Asian Islanders "have inherited a proportion of their ancestry from Denisovans" Humans; thus further discredit 'geno-cidal African replacement' idea as false theory and support multiregional evolution thesis: of human evolution in genetically interconnected worldwide population, happily caring life through fertile generations, with a rich heritage, complex multiple & multidirectional gene flows, till today, to us&you.;