== Rogue: Post-Siege == 

 Hi there,  
 I was wondering how you judge my edit to be 'unsourced commentary', when I give the source (issue and the year it came out: Sentry #4, 2000) right there? That's the literal opposite of 'unsourced'. There are other sections in this page that point it out when different bits of on-panel information contradict each other in Marvel stories. Why is it suddenly a problem now? It's vital to do this on a page that is supposed to give a consistent overview of Marvel characters' history. Leaving out such contradictions would be giving incomplete information, and is in fact making 'editor's choices' of what info is included on a topic and what is left out, which means loss of objectivity. Especially in this case, when the contradiction in question places the whole section's place in this part of the article (Rogue's chronological, canonical, 616-history) in doubt. Current phrasing is incomplete and therefore misleading. (  )