:Instructing editors that we support racism because we do not support your particular edit of flatly stating Michael Richard is a racist in the lead sentence of article, when there is mention of his problematic behavior with regard to a particular incident later in the article, is not an optimal path to opening a discussion of why your edit should remain. You have been reverted by three separate editors now, please do not restore the edit again. It does not appear that you have read the policies I suggested when you posted to my talk page, but I will suggest two more: Wikipedia:Edit warring, and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Both pertain to your current actions editing the article. Thank you for your cooperation.