" 

 == Please don't call me dude == 

 While I'm sure you are an attractive woman, you and I are NOT friends and will NEVER be friends. I'm sick and tired of being banned. PLEASE leave me alone.  
 : Well, given that I blocked you four months back for rampant incivility, twice, and all you got was 30 hours, that was kinda lucky. However, you still persisted in being incivil and generally rude and obnoxious and thus you picked up a block of a few months from a less tolerant admin. So long as you're nice to others, you probably won't hear from me -    
 : Ah - blocked by  for another 6 months, I see. That didn't take long -    

 ==More anti-Irish Witch-hunts????== 
 Hi Ali; been away for weeks but trying to pick up the pieces it apears that Sir Fozzie's ArbCom thanks in large part to Sony) is proposing to ban me for ONE YEAR????!! Mainly on the basis that I insist on stating - (in talk pages, where necessary to explain my edits in relevent Wiki articles - not in the articles themselves) - that the British Empire was a genocidal entity (which it manifestly and demonstratively was!).  

 Can you confirm if I am misreading this?? Frankly, if true, it is an astonishing, naked attempt by the Anglo-American mindset to turn Wiki into their own propaganda organ. Please look into this and advise? The price of FREEDOM is eternal vigelence. (Sarah777 - far away still)  

 : Hi Sarah. I was kinda wondering where you'd gone, actually. I've not looked into your RfC in ages but it looks kinda dead in the water, esp. given that some of the folks commenting are sailing a bit close to the wind in other areas. I dunno. I reckon the RfC will end up being closed by default and everyone will move on. I've not looked into the Famine ArbCom in a while but will get back to you later. -    

 ::If you are right, Alison, that would be excellent news.  
 ::As I said in a recent e-mail to one of Sarah's antagonist's: ""Unlike those propaganda pushers ******* ******* and ******* who only ever edit articles relevant to and in order to advance the ***** **** provo viewpoint, Sarah777 has fashioneed literally hundreds of Irish Geography articles (especially with regard to transportation) and done some absolutely fantastic and backbreakingly intensive and productive work in non controversial areas. Yes, she can lose her rag like you and I both but surely a ban on just the controversial articles would be more appropriate?""...Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ)   •  

 Sarah: I do hope Alison's polished up her crystal ball recently, and is not wrong. Since I know you've got a terrific and wicked sense of humour I thought I'd share with you this quote which just arrived from an editor I respect and admire: 
 ""Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we. 

 - George W Bush,""...Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ)   •  

 * It actually looks like Sarah is being proposed for a 1-year ban. I'm a little surprised. However, it looks like quite a few of the ArbCom members are not endorsing that solution, so we'll hopefully see how it goes -    
 # 

 ::Hi folks! Something surreal here - my unsigned comment above wasn't me - though I share the sentiments if not the poor spelling. What the **** is going on?? Can a few Admins simply ban folk they don't li