::::So, to summarize your dealings with me in this matter so far: 
 ::::* (On my talk page) Alan Liefting: "Please have a read of WP:CAT anf please observe what is convention out there in category land" 
 ::::* I read WP:CAT - and just as I expected, it agrees with me. 
 ::::* I quote from it here (see above). 
 ::::* I observe what other articles are doing - and provide three actual examples from major, high profile, featured articles that are amongst the most frequently visited and carefully edited of any in the entire encyclopedia (Automobile, Physics and Christianity). 
 ::::* (Here) Alan Liefting: "Wikipedia:CAT#Eponymous_categories is largely ignored." and "you will find very few instances where the guideline is followed" - despite I show that there are many, many high-profile, FA-reviewed instances where it's followed - so it's clearly NOT "largely" ignored - it's mostly only ignored by Alan Liefting.  (Who also needs to read WP:3RR.) 
 :::: Hmmm - interesting debating style.  You're demonstrably wrong - what you're saying is contrary to an established guideline and to common practice and not one single other person here agrees with you.  This same argument applies to many other useful category removals that you've recently undertaken.  I shall be reverting all of them if you do not do so yourself. 
 ::::