" 
 ::Yes, but Vesal's point is well taken, and to the extent that sources do not make the distinction, we need not either. If this article is to be about the mythic aspects or Jesus as myth, the historical issues are not part of the subject of the article and fall away. We have articles focussing on the historical aspects, this one should not. If a source discusses mythical aspect of Jesus or Christ, and it's appropriate per DUE and other policies, we should seek to represent what that source says about those aspects, and mention historical aspects only as they directly pertain to the those aspects. We need not go into detail regarding how a myth theory is contestedif we need to say anything about that at all, we can simply say it is contested by notable authority X.   "