==Expose scum bag editor tandem editor Beagle on Technocracy Incorporated talk page== 

 Yeah you jerk... and your editing buddies want to do away with an article because your involved in the workings of this stuff or are ignorant or just plain stupid. 
 ==Epipelagic... another example of a scum member of an editing team trying to get rid of information.== 

 Propose merge to Technocracy Incorporated 

 Quite a substantial part of this article is repeated in Technocracy and Technocracy movement. There's not enough here for a stand alone article. I propose that this article be merged and then redirected to Technocracy movement. LK (talk)  

 Support. TI is not notable enough to have its own article. Johnfos (talk)  
 Support. There is clear overlapping which should be avoided. Technocracy Incorporated is important to be mentioned in the context of technocracy movement, but as a separate article it serve just a promotional purpose on may be even a potential POV fork. Beagel (talk)  
 Support. Per above. Epipelagic (talk)  

 The same group of tandem editors from several years ago still try and control this article. They want to eliminate an article about one of the major social movements ... the group that started it. Wikipedia is known for special interest control and buddy editing. Its a pity and the reason a serious article on an important American group is being tried to be done away with by tandem editors that obviously object for some reason to the content. The past clearly shows the same team of tandem editors here. 

 Beagle and Johnphos are tandem editors as is Lawrencekhoo and Epipelagic... One of the most significant groups in American history and they want to get rid of the article. Its pathetic and shows the weakness of en. Wikipedia. Lawrencekhoo is a mainstream economist who ax grinds economic articles Google his name for his economic 'beliefs' Gino