== Chinese classifiers == 

 I'm not sure whether this should be changed, but this article contains a small error about Mandarin.  The text has "For instance, in Mandarin Chinese, the general noun classifier for humans is ge (個), and it is used for counting humans, whatever they are called:" 

 However, there is another classifier for humans used in polite contexts, wei (位), most often used with respectful words for people like 老师 (lao shi, teacher) or 客人 (guest), but it can be used with the plain word for person 人, especially in formal writing.  I don't think there is any hard-and-fast rule about when it is appropriate to use wei and when ge, but Chinese has a pretty substantial division into formal and informal language and in the wrong context either would look very strange. 

 At any rate, I'm not a linguist and not sure if this merits changing the article, but there it is.