NOTE: 
 The author of this edited "talk" article is clearly someone who is trying to smear the good name of a respected man...probably one of his former employees who was caught stealing or doing some other unsavory deed. He or she is going to a bunch of trouble to continually repost the misinformation many years after the death of Ralph Ginzburg and decades after the supposed publishing. What could possibly be a motivation for this? Does this person have nothing better to do with his/her life? 

 This mysterious unspecified so-called issue of "Consumer Reports" magazine (that he or she is claiming to have referenced) is not available or noted anywhere online except in this talk article. 

 Anyone familiar with Ralph Ginzburg's work knows that it wasn't soft porn of any kind. Images published in the magazines of which he was publisher were art.