::::Can I suggest, then, that the priority is to improve the "Origins" article, using material from the "First" article and elsewhere.  When that is done, we can review what needs to happen to the "First" article - either total incorporation into "Origins" as either text or timeline, or a separate linked article as either text or timeline (or combination of the two).  (I'd be sorry to see it go, but I acknowledge there is too much WP:OR in there.)