:Now you're a bald-faced liar. You asked me to cite a reaction in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and I did. You complained about the LA Times article being from 2004, and I cited the Breitbart article from immediately after the shooting publishing statistics on gun control and arguments against it. 

 :And I wasn't even blocked for the LA Times article. I was blocked for removing the bit on Feinstein and Lieberman introducing the anti-Second Amendment legislation, after arguing that we shouldn't include it at all if we're not going to include the reactions against it. You're abusing your moderatorhood, and oppressing me for my political beliefs. This was a completely different edit than what I got blocked for previously, and your reaction is totally uncalled for. Since when is making one revert, especially when it's a different edit introducing a new source, "edit warring"?