== Sternberg Page == 

 Dear collaborator, 

 I do not think your dealing with this article abide by the principles of wikipedia. 

 If you want to extend the ad-hominem attack upon this man you will have to justify it. But do not just raise the charge without justification. 

 The article "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories" is not an article on creationism. erasmocbc  

 Also, why delete the external links with information on Sternberg and the controversy. The Washington Post, and the Wallstreet Journal are both reputable sources. Is there any reason not to include these in a fair presentation of this case. Further more. You have not justified your changes in the discussion page or seek consensus before changing it. Is wiki a means for abuse? or for fair presentation of information?  

 erasmocbc