:Thanks!  Here are the two concerns I have about the table I inserted: 

 :* It makes no distinction between multiple reponses and single responses.  Now, that's because Stats Canada has not distinguished between "Chinese-Haitian" (a person whose ancestors CLEARLY came from two separate places) and "Japanese-Canadian" (a person whose ancestors may have all been from Japan).  StatsCan treats both of these groups as "multiple responses", and puts one tally in the "multiple response" column for Chinese, Haitian, Japanese and Canadian.  Then someone comes along and simply answers "Japanese" - that person's response gives a tally in the "single response" column for Japanese.  This creates quite a bit of muddling.  Honestly, on this issue, I think that including BOTH single and multiple response tallies is the best strategy (as I have done).  If you happen to be from an ethnicity that habitually hyphenates into "Xian-Canadian", you would be under-represented if we only used single responses.  I think that the current version gives a more valuable analysis of the origins and community identities of the population, rather than a narrowly-defined genetic analysis. 

 :* Terminology - "North American Indian" is a term I have parrotted exactly from the StatsCan document, and I believe that it should not be eliminated entirely, because it is their data we're using.  However, it (along with "East Indian" and possibly others) is a term that could possibly benefit from a parenthetical explanation or a footnote. 

 :With regard to Scottish people vs. Scottish-Canadian, there is simply no available link for some of the "...-Canadian" hyphenated identities (Welsh-Canadian does not exist, for example) so, for consistency, I decided to use the more globally-focused articles.  I really don't care, though  clearly, both are valid in one light or another  so dig in if you want to change over.