I have tagged the article for lack of references. The two given are, respectively, a Nat Geographic mag advert for the book, and an on-line review of the TV docudrama, and there are no citations in the text, which has numerous unsourced statements and some plain inaccuracies. For example, the Winter Journey was not "across the Ross Ice Shelf", the Beardmore Glacier is not an ice tongue, Scott's southern journey did not start out man-hauling but with dogs, horses and motors in accordance with a complex transport strategy which may have been flawed but was carefully planned.  Likewise, the return of support parties was fully planned by Scott, not something he was "forced to do" on the march. Frankly, why does this book need an article of its own anyway, rather than a section in the Cherry-Garrard biography article?