" 

 == request == 

 NYS I've deliberately waited until the recent AN/I discussion was archived. There was a comment you posted that really concerned me in it you made accusations about another editor being inhumane precisely you said ...has been now and in the past one of the reasons why I do not feel well; the continuing attacks, the unfairness of them, the lack of humane compassion, and the sheer and utter outrageousness of the ongoing vindictiveness both...-NYScholar (talk)  . At the time these comments should have resulted in a block as they are a personal attack. What I request is that you go to the archive and remove the comment leaving a [comment retracted] in its place. Its probable that this editor uses her RL name unlike many of us, to leave such a comment in place is harmful, it would also go a long way to taking the tension out of future discussions with the editor.   
 :[Copied from wrongly-placed material in wrongly-created archive page 25.  I almost didn't see it at all; I left the wrongly-archived comment where it is so whoever can help fix this archiving problem will see it and so that Gnan understands that there is some problem in placing it in an archive page instead of on my current archive page (i.e., here, where I have placed it.  Please see archive pages 24 and 25; they need to be deleted and archiving needs to be continuing in archive page 23, which I thought Shell's fixing the bot created. There should not be blue-linked archive pages 24 and 25 yet; if there at all, they would be empty and red-linked.    ] 

 You are free to edit it out if you wish.  [That is: using ""< ! / >"".  However:] There are many comments made about me in the archived AN/I that I feel are harmful [to] me.  I have a real-life identity too, and such comments that these other users were making about me throughout that AN/I and the previous one too are slanderous in my view.  I stated that many times in various ways, to no avail. [Added bold typefont in 1st line referred to in my unblock request, so that it is more visible.   ] 

 The situation that I refer to in my requests for ""compassion"" to [these other users, including the one that you refer to] is already archived in detail, where the discussion between that particular user is already in my already-previously archived pages (archived by the bot): around archive page 21 (based on material already archived in previous archive pages; there is a link to my requests for the user to desist in the onslaught of comments about the previous AN/I in my then current talk page (also archived).  The whole previous AN/I is archived as well. 

 I made no ""personal attack"" against that user; my comments were about my concerns about being constantly attacked myself.  I had already many times expressed my distress at being required to spend so much time on Wikipedia defending myself against what I considered and still consider to be unfounded and unwarranted and false accusations, claims, and statements by others (from the beginning of the past AN/I through the end of the Sept. 5 one). 

 I had and have a right to defend myself and the integrity of my editing in Wikipedia (I also am a real person) against such continual onslaughts; to do so is not be ""defensive""; it is replying to set the record straight. 

 To ""block"" me for what I commented there in my own ""defense"" against such an onslaught of attacks by others is to engage in retroactive and punitive blocks, which violates Wikipedia's own blocking policy.  I think that you need to visit the link (already provided in the more recent AN/I to my own conciliatory comments on that user's page on July 16, 2008 (the user archived it later in her archive page 17). 

 In the more recent AN/I I express my shock at the reemergence of the user (an administrator) in the more recent AN/I and her continual urging that others return to the past and resolved AN/I (based on an earlier entirely misconstrued situation from well before that), because it seemed exactly the opposite of the way we had left the previous matter.  A regurgitation of the same previous AN/I continued throughout the more recent, now-archived AN/I despite my requests throughout it for them to desist, despite my pointing to the July 16th gesture on my part, and despite my stating how tired I was and how I needed to be offline due to a terrible headache from reading the material in the AN/I online and not feeling well due to