:::I think that calling devout Muslims mentioned by name in the article "atheists" or, in the latest round of watering down the libel until it sticks, "extreme" and anti-Muslim, is a serious BLP concern. BLP, copyright, outing, and vandalism are exempted from 3RR for a reason: such things can cause damage and should not be allowed to remain in an article until we get a resolution through protracted dispute resolution to remove them. The onus should be on the person who wants to include the potentially damaging material. And the reasons given in this case—that we can call a Muslim an atheist if they appear at a forum with an atheist, or if we have a RS that someone else called them an atheist—are simply ludicrous. One of the Muslim speakers was condemned for accepting the invitation to speak. Do we really want to be saying such things about her, in a forum that is mirrored all over the internet? —