:IP here; I really don't see the benefit to the reader of all these. You might have had a case for inclusion before the election when prospective voters would have been curious about what the parties were offering and how boundaries had changed, but now these are of very little relevance. We can't neutrally exclude an arbitrary number of parties in order to bring the links to a manageable number. Perhaps as a compromise we could find one link summarising what the parties offered and another summarising the boundary changes. As a general rule the number of external links should not be in the double digits.