::::"reliably sourced"?   Keithbob, while you haven't seen fit to answer the issues raised by the editors above, simply asserting that the sources you have mentioned are reliable sources for this subject is part of your problem.  The burden is on you to at least try to show reliability for this text.  Assertions get you nowhere, and neither will statements like: "So for example the guideline on WEASEL does not mean that we cannot use any source that use the words 'some people' etc."  Suppose I say: So for example the guideline on WEASEL does not mean that we can use any source that use the words 'some people' etc. Where did that get us?  Guidelines exist for a reason.  No one has agreed with you that for whatever reason the clear language of guideline should be ignored in this case, and other editors here and on the Admin page you previously started have stated the weasel words should not be included.