The link should remain.   

 This subject has already been debated at great length on this page.  Jguk has continually denigrated the authors of the Religious Tolerance website as not having theological training and therefore unworthy.  Jguk has not explained why one would need such qualifications to discuss religious tolerance.  He is alone in his view that the website should not be used as an external link.     

 Each of Jguk's arguments about the merits of the Religious Tolerance website has been refuted.  However, for clarity's sake, I will reiterate what I think are the key reasons why the Religious Tolerance site should remain as an external link to this article:  
 #This website reached over 9 million hits in one week in 2004.  
 #It was rated by the Good Web Guide as the most popular religious website on the Internet.  
 #The Religious Tolerance article makes several interesting points about our topic. 
 #The link meets Wikipedia's suggested criteria for an External link. 

 Apart from Jguk, all those who have commented thus far support its retention (i.e., there is consensus).  10:48, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)