: That looks like sloppy work on my part. I think it was done when I was working on another article, perhaps about Barnard Bee. In any event, the first 3 paragraphs were definitely not acceptable. I have watered it down and added teh sources for the rest of the information, also sloppy work not having already included them. Thanks for catching this, as I believe you and I both want good stuff only in these WP articles. Could you review and see what else could/should be done? I will also do a little more work on it. Thanks. Mark in Richmond. Vaoverland  

 I guess it's OK as far as it goes, but I think an article about a military unit should include its full history, including battles/campaigns, names of all the commanders, and the constituent units. This one is almost still in the stub stage. Let me know if you'd like me to take a shot at it.