Editor 67.92, you are only making a tough job worse.  If material has inadvertently failed to make it to the articles that have been established, it was pure accident.  It is not easy to keep track of so much information that keeps getting reverted.  You have to assume his good faith.  But you are not helping this article in the least with all these reckless reverts.  Why don't you show some patience and let him finish his job. When he is done, there will be plenty of time to debate whether or not he achieve the neutrality goals.  It is clear you feel strongly about the subject.  Everyone does, but we can't gain any ground by you making all these reverts.  Let's try to work this out civily.  Pookster is clearly working hard to make this correct.  Give him a break and let him finish.  How about it?