*Ref 12, 76, 211: formatting 
 *Be consistent in including or not including a period and/or a space between p(p) and the page number(s) 
 *Formatting for Lincoln bibliographic entries is off - those books may have been published in the 1900s, but Lincoln certainly didn't write anything then. Format those entries to reflect the fact that he's being quoted from or his writings republished 
 *Be consistent in whether short-form refs use author or editor's name, particularly when the author is Lincoln. If using the editor's name, be consistent in including or not including (ed.) as part of the short form 
 *Be consistent in including or not including parentheses for dated short-form refs. For example, compare "Boritt 1997, p. 10." with "Nevins (1950), pp. 261–272." 
 *Ref 96: you're going to need to give a bit more sourcing information than that 
 *For refs where full bibliographic information is included only in footnotes, use the same formatting and include the same information as for bibliographic entries. Ref 56, for example, is incomplete 
 *Missing bibliographic information for Sherman 1990, McPherson 2009, Bose, Sweetman, Carroll, Dennis, Schauffler