::That's too brief.  It just seems to me to be an obvious solution, if you feel there is too much criticism in the article then add some non-critical substance to it.    

 :::::::Seriously, I would like to know where he was born and something about his family.   

 ::::::::Then research it and add it, Steve.   

 :::::Or:  "Jonathan Wells is an author who says that his life's purpose is to destory Darwinism.  His most well-known book is Icons of Evolution, published in 2000."  -)    

 ==Unbalanced== 
 Do any of the editors who insist on tagging the article care to explain their position?  The tag says "see talk page", but I don't see anything on talk.  Since they refuse to address their gripes, this is just specious.    

 : I didn't tag it, but I agree with the tag. The article is very unbalanced. Almost every paragraph is written from the perspective of his critics. There are plenty of comments here explaining the unfairness of the criticism.   

 ::Of course you agree  one of your icons is not being granted the hagiographic treatment you desire.  Fact is the article is well sourced and rather than bitch find other sources, add more info.  But no, that would be work and it is easier to bitch.