Again I repeat my request here: 

  
 Dear Everybody, 

 With utmost respect. From the beginning when I contacted Prof. Ruggero Maria Santilli Foundation I always wanted to ask them some question that it delayed until I came here.  

 Now I have some questions from Mr. Arthur Robin: 

 1. Would you please let me know the definition of Scientific Community and Scientific Method as per what you have written here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli "Neither these claims nor the existence of magnecules have been accepted by the scientific community"?  If you are so skeptical of Magnegas you may pay a visit to Magnegas laboratories or refineries in China, Europe or USA and inject some of that in your car and run some miles on MagneGAs even if you do not accept the articles published in IJHE or you may get some samples and test them in any of top laboratories all over the world and publish your own analysis in any prestigious peer reviewed and scientific journal you may prefer. Then it would provide a solid ground to discuss that further. So until now it seems that you have committed a crime against Prof. Santilli without sound reasoning to rebute Magnecules by writing as above: "Neither these claims nor the existence of magnecules have been accepted by the scientific community", if not please publish your own analysis of data in prestigious peer reviewed journals so that we will be able to discuss that solidly without prejudice.  

 2. If you would like to rebute any claim of Prof. Ruggero Maria Santilli you would better choose a scientific community of your own preference (if scientific communities differ from each other as the definition of scientific methods may differ from person to person) and then we will go on with you and publish all of your reasonings in a peer reviewed journal. Undoubtedly publishing some nonsense about Prof. Santilli in a free encyclopedia would not rebute anything rather it will make a regrettable reputation for Wikipedia.  

 My friend suggested me to go on starting with what has been already discussed in Nepal Conference but I told him that it seems we should fundamentally start at mundane levels I mean asking a definition of scientific community and scientific method from dear Arthur Robin then go on with his sound reasoning and analysis of data. 

 Be careful that telling any nonsense would not damage Prof. Santilli but it would be a catastrophic damage to Wikipedia's scientific credibility.   

 At this mundane level it seems that we should start from Foundations of Physics,Springer, in my opinion, rather than Nepal Conference. Would you please rebute any of these articles available in this page (http://www.springerlink.com/content/?Author=Ruggero+Maria+Santilli)?   You may start from this paper ""Elements of Iso-, Geno-, Hyper-Mathematics for Matter, Their Isoduals for Antimatter, and Their Applications in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology"". Your rebutal will be consequently reffered to the same journal for publication. 

 I am also translating that paper into Persian language and undoubtedly I will also translate and publish your rebutal. 
 
 Waiting for some reply if there is any.  

 Masood Sanati 
 Fellow of the University of Tehran