==80% of the iron supplements article says citation needed for a couple of years now. No problema over there. Here in casein, of milk, or whatever article relationg to money-making companies, anything that is not "peer-reviewd-meta-analysis-multi-year-properly-formatted" study gets discarded. In other articles users will just change the sayings of the edit. But in anything remotely relating with the beef and dairy industry edits with proper relevance will be just deleted based in some obscure claim. So you want to tell me why you don't care about blogger claims and you don't care about The China Study?==