March 2009 (UTC) 
 :::I am certain that I have no business even attempting to edit the main geology article.  I am wondering, though, how we can call the geology section of this article "neutral."  It appears (to me) to have a clear bias toward a single theory on the formation of the Great Lakes.  Why not include multiple theories, thereby encouraging readers to decide which theory it is with which they are willing to agree?  Otherwise, aren't we inherently making this article non-neutral (and a "soapbox") by withholding alternative information?  Why should you or I be the judge of what others are allowed to see here?    12:26, 16