:I hate to do this, but I've reverted those changes as well, for much the same reason. Here are a few of the issues: 
 :* You removed a reference as 'dead' that wasn't 
 :* You've added the term "creationism" and "mainstream" in places that aren't appropriate. Ex: As a result, many attempts to rebut evolution or creationism are actually straw men 
 :* You've combined paragraphs / removed formatting which made the content easier to read, making monolithic blocks of text which are unmanageable.  
 :* You've tried to simplify some sections, and removed content/context in doing so. 

 :Unfortunately, many of these changes are similar to the issues we had before. Perhaps we can address some of the larger problems at work here, and get to the root of the problem: 
 :# Adding terms like "the majority", "mainstream", "most", etc, to the article is not, and will never be an improvement. This falls under WP:WEASEL, and furthermore would need to be sourced. Even if it were sourced, a greater change to the sentence structure to include that source would be necessary, rather than just a textual addition of most in the sentence.  
 :#*Therefore, please don't add these sorts of words in the text  they aren't appropriate, and must (by policy) be reverted 
 :# Discussion of creationism, other scientific theories, and so forth are only appropriate insofar as they are discussed at length in a relevant section. This article is about specific arguments raised against the the theory of evolution, not about religious texts, creationism, theories of gravity, acceptance of other theories, and so forth. In most cases, this means such topics are not appropriate in this article at all. Creation-evolution controversy, history of creationism, or the respective scientific theory's article would be better places for that sort of content.  
 :#*In short, stay on-topic, and don't discuss other tangentially related topics in the article. 
 :# When simplifying, be absolutely sure you aren't removing relevant content. Simplification should only take the form of rephrasing content which is already present, leaving the same impression on the reader after as before. If you remove content without cause, the change will have to be reverted. 
 :#*In short, check that any text you change or remove doesn't add something (anything!) to the article. If it does, leave it in. 
 :# I know you have strong opinions about this topic, but please remember that the information contained in this article is (and must be) based entirely on the sources provided. This means that, for example, when you change religious sources to alternative sources, this terminology change must be backed up by the respective source; You must establish that this is an appropriate and unambiguous term in the real world through your citations. Not doing so is a NPOV problem, and must be reverted. 
 :#*In short, make sure all changes, including terminology changes, are reflected in the sources listed. 
 :# Controversial changes should go through the talk page first, before being applied to the article. Consensus must be established, per WP policy, before those sorts of additions are included. 
 :#*In short, if you think there might be a dispute, bring it to the talk page before adding it to the article 

 :Hopefully that gives you a better understanding of why your changes are being reverted, and how you might go about contributing to the article in a way which will stick.