The BBC is now covering a similar story about a complaint made by the Middleton family about bikini pictures taken of Pippa that resulted in a legal complaint . This is clearly past the point of trivia or "protecting an innocent" as WP:NPOV and WP:BLP both state that information that is reliable and well sourced should be included, even if it reflects poorly on the subject (as one might argue that "scandalous" pictures would). Furthermore, the EXACT SAME type of information is included on Catherine's page here long before she was even engaged to William, so one could easily argue that her notability at the time was equal to or less than Pippa's notability now, yet the information was included. We really ought to be consistent, and either include it here, or remove it from there. 

 Per WP:BLP "In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If it is not documented by reliable third-party sources, leave it out."; Per WP:NPOV "This page in a nutshell: Editors must write articles from a neutral point of view, representing all significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias." It seems clear that failing to include information that is well-covered in various reliable sources and discusses an important aspect of Pippa's public image ought to be included. In fact, I am thinking as more information comes out, that perhaps we should have some sort of "In the media" or something similar section that can cover these scandals (or perhaps a better way to disseminate the info throughout the article? I'm open to suggestions), as well as the information that she's become the most talked about Middleton family member post-wedding , and her status as a fashion icon , and maybe even all the commentary about her butt (which I don't necessarily think that it should or should not be included, that's up for debate, but is just a thought if we are starting such a section since it is clearly covered in a number of reliable sources, with commentary on her figure and how she keeps in such great shape, etc) . Overall, I think we need to address these issues since (as per my links above) Pippa is clearly a well known person, surpassing her sister in media coverage, and no longer constitutes a "private figure." As such, we must abide by the clearly stated policies in WP:NPOV and WP:BLP and represent her in a way that is unbiased and accurately reflects the viewpoints of the reliable media sources that cover her.