**(sorry for delays, had major computer problems) It is utter and complete fiction that these views are only mine, as demonstrated amply above already, even by secular scientists like Jastrow and others.  You are the one having trouble understanding what Wikipedia is for. It is not a place to plagiarize one culture's ideas and willy nilly impose it on another. It is a place where facts for each culture and idea should be respectfully and factually represented. I would speak VERY STRONGLY (I never screamed at any point...learn that capitals are often used for EMPHASIS around the world) and say exactly the same thing if Buddhist cosmology was imposed on atheists or Islamic on Vedic or whatever (and if I were an expert in that area to know what they teach in detail). It is completely against everything Wikipedia stands for to do what is being done above. There is no bias in representing the facts of what a primary source says. The bias is entirely on the side of those who want to hide and distort that. 

 I made no claim that all Christians believe exactly what I do in every area.  But, in this area, there is wide agreement.  And there are plenty of differences among Darwinians. But that doesn't given anyone the right to describe it with Lamarckianism. 

 What is at issue here is the BIBLE'S view of cosmology, not what Christians think.  If I were to describe what Homer in the Iliad thought about something, it would not be shared by all Greeks. But, it WOULD describe what the Iliad says about it and THAT is the key point here. I can get all sorts of Darwinians to disagree about concepts in Darwin's book. Can I just throw out what Darwin said and impose his rival's view on him, by using the fallacies that are being used above? Of course not. This page says it is describing biblical cosmology in one section, and it categorically is not. It is only imposing Babylonian cosmology on the Bible. What Christians think does not matter if it conflicts with what the Bible says about itself, just as what Darwinians say does not matter in regard to what Darwin said, if they don't have evidence from Darwin's own book for it.  

 Here are some books by major pastors and scientists that support some or all aspects of what what I'm saying:  
 ***www.amazon.com/Dont-Have-Enough-Faith-Atheist/dp/1581345615/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1364126082&sr;=1-1&keywords;=I+don't+have+enough+faith+to+be+an+atheist   
 ***www.amazon.com/Cosmology-Alpha-Robert-John-Russell/dp/0800662733/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1364124600&sr;=1-11&keywords;=The+Bible+cosmology#reader_0800662733   
 ***www.amazon.com/Genesis-Big-Bang-Discovery-Harmony/dp/0553354132/ref=sr_1_12?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1364124600&sr;=1-12&keywords;=The+Bible+cosmology 

 Many others. Here are some articles on the same topics by a range of Christian theologians and scientists: 
 www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth11.html   
 mb-soft.com/public/genesis5.html   
 http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tba/universe-confirms-bible   
 www.icr.org/article/346/   
 www.biblicalreader.com/reader/PDF/Bible_and_Creation.pdf