== Hi #2 == 

 Hi. I just came back for vengeance -) You told me to read The Angel Of The West Window and so I did. I didn't dislike it. 

 On faculty quantum mysticism there's things I can say. It is less likely to spontaneously have knowledge of advanced math and physics than an inner knowledge of spiritual stuff. Though there are people who will deny their feelings on the later; these are, as Carl-Gustav Jung used to put it, people who run to the attic when they hear noises in the basement. Other people do go to the basement (the night sea journey) and learn the value, excuse me, of wearing brown pants for the occasion; other people hire people to tell them how the basement is. 

 Otherwise we believe in math, and purely mental math, awfully, describes the physical world we know to perfection (I suppose Einstein had a quote on this). How is this possible? If this isn't mysticism then what is? -) Particles are probability clouds of events, Schrodinger cats are and aren't, vacuums (vacua it should be, who knows) have energy associated and spontaneously "grow" particle-antiparticle mass pairs, you can interchange mass and energy and maybe time and space, some particles seem travel or to talk to each other faster than the speed of light, and maybe a CO2 molecule that Newton breathed out is now going about Mars. And, of course, maybe the tree isn't there while we aren't looking at it. All this would be quite supernatural, if things didn't occur in nature. Even our thoughts are a natural product. 

 I would hence suggest you some very, very light reading, a novel, "Improbable" by Adam Fawer. It's really light, yet I liked it a lot. Have fun, take care.