===More egrerious POV=== 
 I am begining to think some editors here have no good faith.  

 This is an example of blatant POV: 

 "Hezbollah's political rhetoric has historically revolved around calls for the destruction of the state of Israel." 

 First of all, "rhetoric" is not a NPOV term. "Discourse", or "position" or some such is. 

 Second, the source provided is itself POV, as it states as fact something without providing any sources or quoting directly from documents or interviews.  

 Hezbollah's page here has pretty well documented sources as to what Hezbollah's stands for, and furthermore, by not mentioning what Israel stands for, we violate NPOV principles of balance. 

 Beyond this example, as a general principle it is not NPOV to state as fact something that is someone's POV even if this source is the BBC.