:::Don't checkusers just come up with whatever word they want for the conclusion? What was the one for me... "inconclusive"? It's all bullshit. I think some people should spend half the effort they spend on these witch hunts on actually contributing to the encyclopedia, because some of them actually have good things to contribute. It's certainly hard to collaborate with people who are on a constant crusade to ban editors from the "other side", because it makes it increasingly difficult to assume good faith and believe that they are here to contribute positively and improve the encyclopedia, rather than silence people who they disagree with. And it's not just about "enforcing the rules" or whatever, because I can't remember the last time I saw a detailed analysis on a sock editing with an anti-Israel agenda, and there are a fair number of those. In any case, I just don't have the patience for this garbage. I didn't come to Wikipedia to be an investigator. Unlike certain admins, I haven't spent my life identifying socks on various websites for decades (insert eye roll). That's not my passion. Anyway, I'm out for now.