" 
 == Picture of the (John) Day == 

 Hi, Giano. Thanks for the support on John Day. I'm still a tiny bit concerned about the pictureif you get a chance, would you mind going to the article and clinking on the picture (which should take you to the original, un-thumb-ified version). Do you see the original or not?   

 Thanks again for re-doing and uploading the new John Day picture. I've marked the old one for speedy deletion.   

 ==""Read only"" imminent== 
 OK. No, I haven't done anything, I've been out. I'm leaving it to PRiis to take stock of, when he looks in. Wikipedia will go ""Read only"" in ten minutes or so, according to Jamesday (developer), and stay like that for 20 minutes (yeah, that'll be the best-case scenario, I guess). So, now is not a good time to start any big-ass editing. Piping hot IRC info just for you, Drac.  |   
 :C'est magnifique! All it took to turn you into an image specialist was a crack about fine wining and dining. I pat myself on the back. |   

 == Hi again == 

 Response for you, Giano at    

 ==Fun== 

 Please do not get me wrong. Serious research is my idea of fun; the more obscure the topic, the more fun it is. I bet you had fun with those nice English bobbies, didn't you?   

 :Did you get to film them at their truncheons?   

 ::How wonderful.   

 == Bucks image library == 
 Great new images for Crafton and Wing (you knew it wouldn't have taken me long to notice...).  Did you know that there is now an image library for Buckinghamshire images?  It's at this long address which you may want to bookmark.  I've added those that you've uploaded today, it would be great to get all Bucks images on there for future reference.   | Talk   

 ==Great Billington== 
 You and your villages...! What a fantastically cool parish church. -) As for my page, I keep archiving it, I archive it practically daily, can I help it if I'm so madly popular that it just keeps filling up? You are so lucky not to have that problem.  |   

 == Bath == 

 This article is slowly getting better and better - the main withstanding critique is the lack of information on architecture, for which the city is famous.  suggested at Peer Review that I ""rope you in"", as an architecture buff, to do some work on it - if you get any time this would be greatly appreciated.    
 :(Evil cackle.  |  ) 
 ::Who did? Typing in class again, I won't see your reply for a while, and I don't get the bish e-mail here at all.  |   
 :::Thought that was what you meant, I was watching, too.  |   
 ::::Incidentally, isn't a special Privy Council a very nice thing to have?  |   

 ==Buckingham Palace== 
 ...has all but disappeared!! What have you done?     

 ==Funny you should mention it== 
 I'd just sent an e-mail to one of parties, with whom I'm slightly and pleasantly acquainted, 10 seconds before receiving your message. Not about anything much really, just to ask if ""where"" meant anything in particular. No, nothing will have to be done, nothing can usefully be done, what are you talking about, you deranged deleter of Royal palaces?  |   
 :I understand, I too am being rewarded with a wiki orgy (partly spent in the IRC snakepit -)) after a nose to the grindstone week. Adding a little content to a secret page with more Restoration porn on it. But in a short while I'll be going out to a restaurant meal with friends, you'll have to guard the madhousepedia all by yourself for