:I never claimed to be a "gender fuck" or to have "androgynous preferences", despite the fact that you keep bringing it up to attack and discredit me. Although I do not identify as genderfuck or genderqueer, you seem to think of it as offensive in the same way you keep trying to offend people by calling them "homosexual". I agree that "tranny chaser" is common but also offensive. "Transsensual" was not my term but 's.  If you read my above statement, you will find out my opinions on the matter. My main problem was the use of highly offensive statements and generalizations.  I have tried to find a compromise by accepting the move to Tranny chaser and adding a statement that the term primarily concerns non-trans men who are attracted to pre/non-op trans women.  What I will not accept is statements like All tranny chasers share one common denominator: they all want to explore homosexual relations and perform the 'bottom' role  they want to be sodomized log (especially with no source for such a broad statement).  Perhaps you feel that these men are predatory but your NPOV violations would apply to remarks against any group. If someone claimed that homosexuals were dangerous child molesters or that Mexicans were undermining American culture (both popular claims), it would be considered vandalism and removed.  The same goes for your vandalizations.