:No matter who your are, you are welcome to add facts (along with the appropriate context) to this article, as long as they are significant to this article. The statements about a Mannatech/Royal Society connection to which you're referring – that have been deleted in the past – have usually been along the lines of "There are studies being done all over the WORLD on Mannatech products. For example, clinical trials are under way at The Royal Society of Medicine at Oxford, England." There is nothing in the links you provide that substantiates this assertion. No one else has provided reliable sources to support such a connection to the Royal Society. The only thing that the links substantiate is that Dr Axford is a member of the Royal Society and served as a local president of one of its chapters (sections) at one time. Well, I hope every physician in England is a member of the RS; there is no significance to the article that one of Mannatech's employees belongs to a professional society that every physician in Britain belongs to. And that is not the same thing as saying there is a notable or significant connection between Mannatech and the RS, and it certainly does not support that the Society itself is conducting studies of Mannatech's products. Certainly St George's Hospital appears to be conducting studies, but that's already covered in the article. There is no reason to mention the RS in the article since Dr Axford's professional credentials are at issue, so I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to make that mention? |