::::My argument is that the image is SUPERFLUOUS, as the text is graphic enough to sufficiently explain the act. It is simply not needed. Also, if I ever had even the faintest inkling of desire to spend a moment of my time creating an image of a 'creampie,' I would immediately kill myself because my life would no longer be meaningful. I was messaged about "edit warring;" so much for being BOLD. I asked for consensus and dissenting opinions BEFORE reverting my initial edit, but was ignored. So far, my opinion versus two does not a consensus make. I'm attempting to improve an article, but it's pointless- keep your disgusting and poorly rendered cartoon porn that serves no educational or encyclopedic value except to include as many images of vaginas and semen as possible in a project that asks to be taken seriously. That the image's inclusion is SO IMPORTANT speaks VOLUMES about the average wiki editor's irl contact with females. And for chrissake, if you INSIST on cartoon porn, at least render it well. Wikipedia is so lulzy.    -LM