Personally, I think its a non-issue now since a direct passage from a book is being quoted in relation to the subject matter.  The direct quote should not be changed top suit the anonymous IP's whims.  Even if the direct passage were not there, there's no need to spell out the entire word as Asher mentioned, regardless of whether people aren't dumb as to what it refers to.  It really has no place here - the central focus is on that they changed the name from Puck to Pack, which is what relates more directly to the article.  If the word "Fuck" had a more direct context to the article, i.e. it had more to do with the design of the game and its characters, I could see including the word.  But its just a brief passing footnote about a name change, which is a subject that can be talked about with or without mention of the word. And Keifer, if someone is interested in localism and vandalism, it'd be more appropriate to link to the article on vandalism.  The context of the entire passage is not about the word "fuck" and what that word means - the definition and description of the word fuck plays no part in the article.  The entire issue is about potential vandalism, that because of the letters in the name happen to be easy to change to a set of words to vandalize - Fuck, Suck, Dick, Lick, etc. - the key being vandalism and not a specific word itself.