::::::::I mean, Quack, that the argument given to this point is not sufficient to convince me that a name change is necessary - and that if it was, then someone better come up with a better title than that proposed (and immediately applied) by .  With only three people weighing in right now, I would not consider this consensus.  Thanks for that explanation, Kendrick7 - with that in mind, then I do not think that the name should have been changed either, and should be reverted to "Essjay controversy."