, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 
 :Good input ZScarpia, and as for that FireJeff guy, the Palestine Royal Report has no higher value of "truthfulness" than the Curzon memo. It has no legal effect at all, it's a report which was overwritten by the Woodhead Commission. A report based on the author's subjective perspective. The report also said much more such as Jews should be allowed a much smaller state, so if it's law then voila, there's the conclusion. And the idea that it's "more truthful" than the Curzon memo is ofc bullshit based again on your opinion because you have no facts to resort to. The Royal Report wasn't added to the mandate either, however the Curzon memo perfectly well explains and even refers to Balfour himself, the wordings of the declaration. I think you simply do not understand what type of document a report is. Anyway it's clear a vast majority of reputable sources stand by that it's a Class-A mandate, only Eli Hertz who is known to reject anything not fitting his extreme in absurdum narrative, stands like a perpetual naysayer in denial.//  12:32