::::No, you're wrong again.  The way NLPers use the term engram is distinct from the way neurologists use it.  NLP has nothing to do with Scientology (the CoS "spirtual" doctrine) it's related to Dianetics (the CoS "psychological" doctrine) in a number of ways which I'll detail for you shortly.  Rather than spray this page with your paranoid rantings try doing some earnest research.  You know f*ck all about NLP and Dianetics as you repeatedly demonstrate so sit back, shut the f*ck-up, read and learn.  Soliciting information and evidence from others  rather than ranting and typing banal expletives  would go towards relieving you of your ignorance and broadening your pathologically narrow perspective.  The only asshole in this discussion is you.  Would it kill you to simply ask for more detail regarding a matter which you contest?  Or is it that you simply cherish your groundless prejudices and can't bear to lose them (a kook without prejudices is no kook at all).  You made a complete dick of yourself regarding Fritz Perls and Dianetics, the false ineffectual-harmless/effective-harmful dichotomy, the issue of Dianetics and hypnosis, the problems of anecdotal evidence etc. etc. etc. and you're about to do it again regarding the similarities between Dianetics and NLP.  Is your ability to learn impaired or are you so f*cked-up in the head that you can't resist your own aberrant urges to make an ass of yourself on the WWW?