::i don't know: the title points to the issue of gun-ownership in general, which isn't even contested in this case. so i would suggest the paragraph is irrelevant to the article, since it only considers the granted right to concealed carry, not the prohibition of guns in genral. furthermore, as i have stated above, it doesn't satisfy  NPOV if one cites an op-ed piece of the gun owners of america ( i.e. a pro-gun lobby group) without presenting a contrarian point of view. just saying that 'some' have a different POV isn't quite enough. 

 ::addendum: i've added the NPOV-tag, because i find that this problem pervades the article in general