::*Nope, I'm not with you here. First of all "Nanowicht does make a good point..."'''. Where? This is a point that you'' are making - since my last warning Nanowicht has been silent. And secondly you noted on Nanowicht's talk page that WP:NOTVAND applies. Which particular section? There are many. Nanowicht's edits are WP:POVPUSH, probably even WP:FRINGE - I mean, comparing the structure of a scientific paper to the Trinity, c'mon! Continuing after being warned is highly disruptive.