" 
 Dear Muslim friend, thank you for your contribution. I feel the need to remind you though that any such experiment would constitute a primary source, which is not allowed in Wikipaedia: we work with secondary sources only... i.e. we work with science not with rumour. Now, having come to rumour, I have seen a pig toilet (in an Eastern European village) myself. Surprise surprise, the pigs did not eat the feces. If they did the owner wouldn't have been forced to clean up the thing weekly. I'm sorry to tell you but this is bollocks! 77.4 is completely right: that would be aomw recycling. And pigs would be the cheapest animals to raise... they would only eat their own feces: feed them once and it would be sufficient for a pig's lifetime. Only thinking at that would give you an inkling of an idea whether your assertions are true or false. 
 Now, as for the science of it, there are plenty of sources that detail what pigs do eat. Feces of any kind is not present in any of those studies. And that's the proof it's not happening. It's not happening under normal circumstances. Homo sapiens, under normal circumstances, does not eat flesh from other homo sapiens. Obviously there have been exceptions under the most unusual of circumstances (groups of people starving to death, cultural constructs etc.) but naturally it doesn't happen.    
 ::::::Dear 79.112.59.92, There is no reason for you to assume someone is Muslim. It is natural for pigs to eat human feces. It is not limited to Goa in India. You can go to any Indian village where pigs are present and see for yourself. Please refute my claim and I will give you 1 million U.S. Dollars. This is my challenge. It should be the same for any European village also. For how many days together did you observe the pigs? How many pigs did you observe? Are you 100% sure they did not eat feces? -   
 ::::::Dear 79.112.59.92, my challenge still stands: show me that a domestic pig does not eat human faeces naturally and I shall give you one million U.S. dollars, but only if I am not able to show you at least hundreds of pigs in India eating human faeces. If they eat you will have to pay me 1 million U.S. dollars, so don't try to run away from the truth. It is not under special circumstances, and I can say boldly that YOU ARE LYING when you saw the pigs in eastern europe (are you sure they were pigs. You love pork and don't like this fact. -   

 ==Merger proposal== 
  has posted a merger proposal template on this article, suggesting merging Domestic pig and Pig (I have copied the template to this article as is usual in this situation).  Can we please discuss at Talk:Domestic pig#Merger proposal.     

 ==Requested move== 

 :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.  

 The result of the move request was: page not moved.    

  

 :Pig → Sus (genus) — Discussion of a request to merge Pig into Domestic pig found issues with the current arrangement of pages.  The article about the genus occupies the page name Pig and consequently attracts content about anything and everything to do with pigs, but other articles exist and the result is content forking.    

 * Pig (disambiguation) → Pig 

 *Oppose. People looking for ""pig"" are very unlikely to know that they are really looking for ""Sus (genus)"". There has to be a better way to solve the problem.    
 :This sounds like a reason to support, actually.  These people probably don't want the genus anyway, but rather domestic pig or one of the many