::: Then you need to study the difference between "Hispanic" and "African-American". Apparently you are not aware that someone can be both African-American and Hispanic (or White and Hispanic) because the latter is an identification of culture, not of "race". The case also states this it finds the plaintiff to be Hispanic "for purposes of Title VII" only (in Paragraph 101). An Italian or a Romanian could be found to be Hispanic "for purposes of Title VII" if that person were discriminated against based on the discriminator's belief that the person was Hispanic. That certainly wouldn't make them Hispanic. Please read the case more carefully, as your analysis misrepresents what the court actually said.