THis article was out of date, and did not appear to have a neutral POV. 

 Controversial sections have been removed (the references to them did not appear to be much other than references to potential competitors unreferenced assertions. 

 The article could probably be improved by a NEUTRAL PoV reference to the contentions various parties, including governmental actors, who have, over the years, expressed a desire to take over .NA, but the old article appeared to lack even the basics of neutrality.