:I don't see how you can argue WP:Synth when the paragraph is sourced so heavily. For reference, here's the paragraph and instead of citations, I've shown the authors cited. 
 :::In his 1832 autobiography, Smith wrote that he had become concerned with religion at about the age of twelve.[Bushman, Vogel, Quinn] Probably around 1820[Bushman, Vogel, Brodie, Quinn] Smith decided to pray for a forgiveness of his sins and to ask which church was right.[Bushman, Vogel, Quinn, Brodie] Smith said that in response to his prayer he had a theophany or first vision, in which God appeared, told him his sins were forgiven, and that all contemporary churches had "turned aside from the gospel."[Bushman, Brodie, Vogel]  Smith told few people about his vision, and the event passed unnoticed in his home town.[Bushman, Vogel, Roberts, Brodie, Anderson] 
 :Each sentence is supported in whole by at least one of the sources cited, usually more, while the others lend support. Also, the entire paragraph is supported by Bushman, which, I think, will make your Synth argument very difficult.  
 :I'm not very familiar with the dispute resolution process, but I think the easiest resolution would be to simply rely on reliable sources instead of the original research you seem to be doing. ~