" 

  

  

 Memorandum For The Record 
 MASINT is one of the departments of the new US National Directorate  ofIntelligence 

 http://www.intelligence.gov/1-members_nro.shtml - 38k - Oct 9, 2005 

 UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY - WHO WE ARE 
 The Director of National Intelligence establishes the NRO’s collection priorities 
 and ... the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central MASINT Office, ... 
 NRO mission partners are the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central MASINT Office, and the United States Space Command. 

 MASINT straddles strict disciplinary definitions.  It 
           may use collection techniques of, but does not fit 
           neatly into any one or all of the more recognized 
           ""traditional"" disciplines of IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, etc. 

      -    MASINT is the least understood of the disciplines and is 
           perceived as a ""strategic"" capability with limited 
           ""tactical"" support capabilities.  However, MASINT has a 
           potential ability to provide real-time situation 
           awareness and targeting not necessarily available from 
           the more classic disciplines. 

      -    MASINT is a science-intensive discipline that needs 
           people/scientists well versed in the broad range of 
           physical and electrical sciences.  Such scientists can 
           not typically be professionally developed with the IC. 
           They must come from academia fresh with scientific 
           knowledge from experimentation and research.  Nor can 
           they continue to be ""proficient"" in their areas of 
           expertise if they remain in government employ for an 
           entire career. 
 http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house/intel/ic21/ic21007.html 

 Evidently any unrespectable weird stuff like alien UFOs & paranormal & zero point dark energy exotic weapons technology allegations would be the concern of MASINT on the chance that there is something real there and that some inside USG know something we do not despite all the plausible deniability and the smoke screen provided by CSICOPS and the ""Cranks"" that are two sides of the same coin. If the Cranks did not exist CSICOPS would have to invent them, indeed, sometimes they do! ;-) 

 On Oct 11, 2005, at 8:14 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: 

 OK Salam worked on it - but after he invited me to ICTP in 1973 because of that very idea. Abdus Salam had idea of strong short-range gravity from spin 2 f-meson, but I had the idea of the universal Regge slope as gravity in a rotating Kerr black hole that has J ~ alpha'E^2 automatically  G* ~ 10^40G i.e. Lp* ~ 10^-13 cm gives 1 Gev scale. It was me making that connection that caused him to telephone me at SDSU to come to ICTP in 1973. Jagdish Mehra may have notes on this. I went to Brussels to see Prigogine & Robert Brout. Merhra was there and he was also at ICTP. Brout was one of my tutors at Cornell in group theory. 

 On Oct 11, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: 

 Yeah they start the paper with my idea from 1973 - strong gravity black holes as Regge trajectories. I wonder if I am cited in ref (1). Abdus Salam invited me to ICTP. I lectured on it in Ljubiliana & a paper in Frohlich's ""Collective Phenomena"" early 70's. The idea is in Super Cosmos. 

 On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:36 PM, Gary S Bekkum / SSR wrote: 

 Found this looking up old references for the dark energy dark matters story... 

 http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9509016 

 An Effective Strong Gravity induced by QCDAuthors: V.Brindejonc, G.Cohen-Tannoudji 
 Comments: 9 pages, latex, no figures; to appear in Mod.Phys.Lett.A 
 Report-no: DAPNIA/SPhN-95-17 
 Journal-ref: Mod.Phys.Lett. A10 (1995) 1711-1718 
 We show that, when quantized on a curved ``intra-hadronic background'', QCD induces an effective pseudo gravitational interaction with gravitational and cosmological constants in the GeV range. 

  
 Typo-corrected 2nd Draft below 

 e.g. change 

 dW + W/\(1 + B) = 0 

 to 

 dB + W/\(1 + B) = 0 

 *A caution on the SHORT HAND notation. I have suppressed tetrad indices for brevity, but this can cause confusion since 

 v/\w = - w/\v 

 so that 

 v/\v = 0 

 With indices the above is 

 v^I/\w^J = - w^J/\v^I 

 so 

 v^I/\v^I = 0 

 But 

 v^I/\v^J =/= 0 when I =/= J 

 This would seem to say that, for example in the formulae below 

 W/\W = 0 

 But that is not so, because what that means is 

 W^