:::I'd certainly want to see something better than this exercise in weasel words. What would be best is sources that put the variety and extent of scientists' creationist beliefs within real context. It is at best at best confusing, at worst deliberately misleading, to say "X number of totally real scientists reject evolution" without adequately delineating what type of scientists, of what qualifications, within how large a community, and with what infulence upon that community. If we were to accept creationontheweb.com as a reliable source, the best that could be responsibly attributed to that source would be a general statement along the lines of "There are a non-zero number of scientists that accept the biblical account of creation and reject the scientific consensus regarding evolution." Better sources might be some sort of academic study or poll that can put all the relevant variables in context. — ''''