There are two main issues in the article that either count as bias or original research: 1. "Orel misinterprets theology."  2.  "Most of the townspeople do not live the way a Christian is supposed to.... Christianity presented in the show is a jaded view of how Christians act today as opposed to how they are supposed to be setting an example of how to live."  On the contrary to these points, from an objective point of view, the show mocks the actual literal tenants of Christianity itself.  Humor arises because Orel interprets Christian dogma literally: he believes in actual omnipresence, he believes in the second coming, that the dead will rise again, etc.  The show isn't about a failure to live up to a Christian ideal this is the bible.