I think the Nature review is rather negative, and having initally said "equivocal" I suggested re-categorising this as "somewhat negative".  Sparkhead has reversed this, citing the conculsion: "Perhaps there can be no higher praise than to say that I am certain I will remember and borrow many examples from this book in my own future discussions."  I don't know if he's used to reading academic language about a very powerful colleague, but what that means is "some very good examples, shame about the book"  Still I don't feel that strongly about the wording - people who read the review, and see the (devastating) cartoon can judge for themseleves. If I were Dawkins I'd have been mortified!