== Critics of preterism from [blank] perspective == 

 I think that is unnecessary.  What I think would be useful is to add parenthetical comments after a particular critic IF necessary.  For instance, my site hosts criticisms from ALL perspectives, I don't care if they are futurist or historicist.  Other sites do so as well.  If there are particular sites that wanted to be noted as Historicist Critics then that should be added as a parenthetical comment. 

 And of course I am with Roderick and Theonomy - NPOV requires reporting all views in an accurate matter.  The idea is educationn not indoctrination. 

 I do plan on making the edits that Theonomy and I discussed above, I just haven't had time.  I also am awaiting feedback then on that "critics" comment I made above because having all those subcategories just doesn't reflect the reality of how sites are organized.  In this, Virgil is correct.  The main purpose is the article itself - not all of the resource sites and breaking them down into unnecessary minutea.