:I just noticed that in the Mont Blanc infobox, it is stated that Everest is the parent and has been for some time. I have not noticed any challenges. So I don't think there is a serious problem. The challenging edits to the topographic prominence article appear to be coming from new editors; I see no experienced editors among them. The challeging edits to the talk pages are from more experienced editors, but these are not frequent. When they do occur, we should talk the trouble to respond to them. Meanwhile I really appreciate your contribution to the maintenance of topographic articles, and I would welcome any contibutions that you can make regarding improving the referencing. 

 :I assume that the other talk page issue was the deletion of a link that I added to Mount Athos. The actual deletion did not bother me, but the referenced site is owned and maintained by a Norwegian maths professor with wide ranging experience of mountaineering and GPS use. I have been using his site as a reference in support of several peak height claims that are often in disagreement with other sites which simply copy old and inaccurate heights. So far nobody has deleted these references, but I was concerned that if all references to his site are to be removed on the grounds that it is a blog, my peak height claims would be challenged as OR.