::Altenmann has just reverted my re-insertion of the Æblerød bit, that has been in the article unchallenged for a long time. Of course, THAT is not a significant argument, but I think this bit meets Altenmann criteria for inclusion. Unlike most vandalism in Wikipedia, it is clearly meant as a "fictitious entry", and it illustrates the concept in a different way from all the other examples. I originally introduced this bit - though others contributed. I always thought that a similar story in a less obscure corner of wikipedia with English sources would be even better, but to ignore the world's largest encyclopedia here strikes me as odd.