" 

  

 == -Ril- == 

  
  or   has engaged in a series of disruptive behavior on Wikipedia. He has: 

  
 ::*Engaged in personal attacks through stalking and revenge reverts and edits against other users  

 ::*Engaged in RfC certification fraud  

 ::*Engaged in article vandalism by deleting (multiple times) an editor's statements 

 ::*Engaged in disruption of Wiki 

 ::*Used misleading and deceptive edit summaries  

 ::*Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions  

 ::*Attacked users who questioned his claims 

 ::*Vandalism 

 ::*Sockpuppetry 

 A large number of his edits are for the purpose of harassing/attacking other users or otherwise disrupting Wikipedia. 

 See  for clear evidence. 

  

  

  

  

  

  
 Here is some of the testimony against Ril to support my serious accusations (see .   Co.,   
 for full details) 

  
 I have reviewed your edits   
  where you have added inlined, sexually charged images to the ""WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency.  I find these edits to be in bad faith, and consider them to be vandalism indistinguishable from a type we see all too often.  While the images may be relevant to the subject, the captions you used, the fact that they were inlined rather than linked, the fact that you pursued a sterile edit war to be sure that they remained on the page, and your lack of other participation in the page all speak to the fact that this was a mere act of vandalism rather than an attempt at reasoned discussion. 

 Based on this vandalism, and your substantial prior history of problems with the community 1, 2, [3], I am making your block indefinite pending the outcome of the arbitration proceeding now underway and pending any further discussion by the community, who may ban users at its discretion. 

  Co.,   

 Excerpts 

 *It is long overdue...but be careful as all procedures need to be followed...  

 *I support this. I feel that -Ril- was trolling. Note how he added a reference to Ouze Merham in this edit. -   

 *No problems from me over the ban.    

  

  
 *When you get to a point where you can't possibly understand a user's actions except in the context of trolling and disruption, I think it's safe to assume that's what they are. Ask yourself, ""Why would someone be doing this?"" And if the only answer that satisfies your question is ""Trolling"" or ""Vandalism"", it's time to ban them.    

 *It is quite obvious that -Ril- (?) does not have the civility that is so important for Wikipedia to work. I have seen nothing but disruption. Even if he has made valuable contributions, his behaviour is liable to alienate other valuable and more civil contributors.  

 *all I've ever seen from -Ril- is trolling and tounge-in-cheek wikilawyering. The decision to block may have been bold, but I agree with it. People should not be expected to put up with this sort of behaviour, and the arbcom still gets to have the last word.    

 *Yes, he is a troll. For instance, he has wasted a lot of people's time on nominating articles for deletion only to make people upset. As soon as you remark that the vfd was un