:::::First of all, I admit to being unnecessary sharp in my tone, specially since You did reply "Thank you for informing me, I didn't know that in fact...". But I simply didn't notice that reply when I wrote my previous comment. Please believe me, I really didn't. I didn't know at which time goal ratio was abandoned in favor of goal difference though. But now we do know that both, and that is good, I presume and hope. (Every season prior of 1940/41 needs a change, and the goal difference column ought to be changed into goal ratio, or by very least removed). Further, Allsvenskan was the first and only national league (until "Superettan" was created 2000), "Svenska Serien" was divided into a north and a south league. "Allsvenskan" was created by the 6 best teams from both leagues, or this was the original intention. But Djurgården and Landskrona both came 7th in the north and the south league. But SFF wanted them in Allsvenskan instead of Fässberg (dispite of the fact that they won the SM-title) and Västerås IK. Hence all qualified teams should pay a rather high amount of money to SFF, if they should participate. The amount was too much for Fässberg, however not for Västerås IK. This was how Landskrona BoIS qualified for the first season ever of Allsvenskan. The money was payed back to the clubs soon afterwards. The main reason why Fässberg wasn't welcome in Allsvenskan was that the club lacked dressing rooms and showers for the visitors. I'm less familiar with reasons why Västerås IK also wasn't welcome. A plausible reason may be that SFF simply wanted two teams from Stockholm (AIK was qualified). Also of interest, is, like I wrote, that Allsvenskan has run for a sequence of almost 90 years, I don't think the Swiss league exceeds this. Which other national league may have been played for such a long sequence ? (Portugal ?, but not Spain due to the civil war 36-39) Also how the season shifted from autumn to spring into spring to autumn is worth mentioning, and the "Maratonallsvenskan" 1957-58 (it explain f.i. howcome Motala has played one season and 33 games in the all time table. You just removed a lot of this true facts. (no less sourced than most of the article). And back to "your" page and our unnecessary strong words, It was your comment "they were runner's up in 1937-38" - although I had explained that I'm a supporter of Landskrona BoIS - that got me really furious. But I am indeed sorry, especially since I didn't notice Your reply. Reguarding the level of English, I had or have no intention of compete with You, but there was a lot of Swedish here at your talk page, that I happened to notice during my first visit here (And like I stated, I had never seen any user with higher ranking than native before, but I've now noticed that You are far from alone). Reply to your last comment - I have certainly not made any complaints on your "academical style". I might be a bit worried though, when a user that has made hundreds of edits in an article, stands by a notable error, like "Landskrona BoIS was runner's up 1937/38" (dispite what I wrote from scratch), then there actually is a severe hazard for lots of other errors. Especially since the article is almost free of references and other sources. You have to agree with me in that argumentaion, I hope. However I don't believe that it's the case here. But I fail to see need of the aggregated city vs city table (that's why I added also teams with no gold), doubt if such comparission exist in other article of leagues. But I am truely sorry if You have You felt Yourself offended by my previous answer, and I can understand if that has been the case. I think I changed the "Big silver" to the correct "Little silver" three or four times (including refs). So I hope You can understand some of my frustration aswell. Is my largely appology accepted ?    
 (Sorry for putting this reply at wrong location)