" 

 :::::We probably do need a second WebCiteBOT. Primarily because there are so many sources on Wikipedia that one bot can't be expected to handle them all. And lately, with GeoCities, Encarta and now the Times, there is constantly some source that is going offline that requires priority handling that the general references don't get archived. Also  has been offline since November and the bot running has posted numerous times that the bot would be running again soon but nothing has ever happened ,  and . The  was busy in the real world for the last part of 2009 and first part of 2010, but it appears he has resumed normally Wikipedia activity so it is obvious this bot is just very low on his priority list. Because of the good this bot can do, I would really like to see a second bot, even if the current bot resumes normal activity. The current bot has a database of references that have been added since it went live, but (I don't believe) it will archive references that existed before it went live, so a new bot could handle those. Now, I don't know how to create bots, but I will support your request if you do request one.—• "