:::It is published right here, it just happens to have been rejected from the journal the original was published in.  And it's not like this is new research which needs to go in a journal to count as "published", since it is an analysis of existing published research which is widely available.  Go into ISI and search for yourself.  Go through a few hundred yourself and you won't find the ratio that Oreskes says you will find.  I called "bullshit" on that study a while ago, because the original data is right there to view, and it doesn't match what she says it should.   —  |