So as Matt as made his case with his "evidence" I shall now simply show you the holes in his argument. (of which there are many). 1st thing I notice is our "combined interests" and "early edits.    
      
 *UK nationality - I don't think I've edited a page once on Wales, England or Scotland. He claims me reverting some ips changing the UK as his nationality in the infobox to Scotland as some way as proving this. I am a fan of tennis so upon seeing an ip changing his nationality I looked at the talk page and their was a consensus for using UK. I don't really have an interest in this, just in tennis.   

  
 *Ireland topics - The simple thing of this "combined interest" is that I'm Irish and naturally I would edit these. Dublin is my home city and Ireland is my country. Using Republic of Ireland is a contentious issue among many editors on Wikipedia, as it not the name of the country. I noticed upon my first editing that there was a large discussion going on about the name. The consensus following the discussion was to pipelink Roi to Ireland. I just did that on a few articles where they are now stable and accepted as it the consensus.    
      
 :He claims I was discussing the Good Friday Agreement [here]. I don't see it mentioned and I'm not sure what point he is trying to make.    
      
 :He also claims I attacked  here, but I have no idea where this attack is.    
      
 :He also claims that I learned to pipelink Wikipedia policy early on as per herehowever I didn't pipe anything just copy and pasted from the Wikipedia policy page.    
      
 :There are many other random made up claims he makes which I don't know what have to do with anything such as this where he claims I was distancing NI from the UK when the edit shows me reverting an edit which defied the consensus and stable version of a topic relating with the state of Ireland. These claims are bizare and I'm not sure what they have to do with a sock case and are I feel made up to tarnish my name for whatever particular reason.