I appreciate your view on this. I think it touches on a topic often debated on Wikipedia (inclusion vs. exclusion). I think your point is quite valid, but I do disagree to some extant. In this case, no one is disputing the relevence or validity of the information. I believe I would view the situation differantly if there was significant dispute over how this affects WP:NPOV or fits under WP:RS, for example. I'm also basing this on the inclusionist treatment of no-consensus in various areas of WP, such as AfDs. This is of course, just my own view.