While the first sentence of the second paragraph of the 'Response to Critique' is indeed an apposite and effective response to the critique of theistic evolution, the second and third sentences of that paragraph ("It is also tempered by a limited predictive value of the evolutionary theory. To paraphrase Popper, evolution tells us 'everything about the past but nothing about the future.'") relate to evolution itself, not to theistic evolution, and certainly not to the preceding critique of theistic evolution. (Bear in mind that this 'Response' is made from the standpoint of a proponent of theistic evolution.) 

 I propose to remove those two sentences as being irrelevant and diluting the force of the preceding response. Any comments? ~