::::: you are conflating two things, the RM and usage of "Islamic State" in the article.  Technophant is talking about the latter.  Where did PBS "and others" say it is disruptive to want to use "Islamic State" in the article?  You mean disruptive to keep proposing RMs.  The ISIS to ISIL discussion and consensus had nothing to do with  "Islamic State", btw.  I can't see any bad faith or forum shopping going on, just an attempt to rationalise the use of "Islamic State" in appropriate parts in the article, which makes sense to me.