== Regarding intelligent design == 
 I am of the opinion that intelligent design is written from a non-neutral point of view, and more importantly, some articles on its proponents give undue weight to their errors.  It is also my opinion that all of the alleged conduct issues surrounding the editors are related to content.  Am I the only one who believes this? 
 Let's close this RFC and take it to mediation.  I think the only aspects of this dispute worth "" are "Is the intelligent design article written from a neutral point of view?  If not, how shall we fix them?"   and "Do the intelligent design-related BLPs give undue weight to negative information about the article subjects?  If not, is that a problem?"