==Bias 

 Frankly, this entry seems rather heavily biased towards sweatshops; as proof, I point to the "Arguments for Sweatshops" section, which has no substantial counter-argument section.  The closest this entry has is "The Anti-Sweatshop Movement" (a biased title), which is much more general, and makes almost no mention of the well-documented human rights abuses that occur in sweatshops (in Haiti, for example, where factories were rat-infested and workers were paid a median wage of about 20 cents an hour).  This article also ignores the practice of sweatshops (like those owned by Disney) to average their low-paying workers' salaries with the higher paid overseers, resulting in a skewed average.  While I agree that sweatshops can be good in some instances, and anti-sweatshop protesters have sometimes misunderstood the issue, to so dramatically downplay the human rights abuses that go on here seems absurd.  The paragraph on debt bondage and human trafficking is good, but again, I notice that this paragraph is buried.  If there is going to be an "Arguments for Sweatshops" section, to be fair, there should be a corresponding section titled "Arguments Against Sweatshops".  Michael