::I might actually have to offer a word or two for Urthogie here.  While I haven't compared the full extent of the changes, I think his effort to better organize the article actually makes some sense, disagreements notwithstanding.  Looking at the version before, for instance, one serious problem is the huge reliance on quotes, and beyond that, quotes which offered almost nothing in the way of explanation.  If you look at the old "Use of the term" section, specifically, the explanation really stopped with Adam and Moodley, then proceeding into a quote farm of people making the allegation.  We then had an explicit list of the same kinds of quotes, apparently by more prominent individuals though not clarifying this. We then had a section on the UN, slightly out of place, followed by the long section on people lambasting use of the term, again without really any explanation.  Only after all that did we actually have an explanation of what all these people are talking about.   

 ::Urthogie's version, while quickly done, actually seems to solve much of this, by splitting it up into three ways in which the allegation is used, so that we can actually have some context and explanation.  Already this division is contextual information the other didn't provide.  He then provides the quote list, but followed directly by a discussion of the conditions.  At least on a surface level, this seems to make sense.  Perhaps partially as a result, he's also then trimmed up the "Use of the Term" section to remove what were really just examples, to something that could be built into a more encyclopedic explanation (possibly using the rest of Adam and Moodley). 

 ::In any case, that's not to say I agree with all of the changes.  For one thing, I'm not sure the "Allegations that Israel is an Apartheid State" section should really be a section of its own.  If anything, I'd move it to third, as in "Some people make the allegation without specifying what exactly they're referring to."  Perhaps others should give it another look, though?  I'm sure there are other issues that I haven't picked up yet, but I think the organizational approaches might have some merit.