:::"Who's we?" is a rhetorical question (since "there is no 'we'").  My main concern is that the article doesn't really seem to distance itself sufficiently from the actual debate itself, as there should not be the slightest implication anywhere that the use is wrong (equally, there should be no implication that it is right either).  The bits marked with  are particularly problematic, and probably need some hefty rewording.  Proportion is not really relevant to NPOV, especially in situations such as this, where the proportions on either side of the debate are not known.