JN466—he asserts in plain English that he is Jewish. The interviewer asks him if he is a practicing Jew. He replies that he is not a practicing Jew. The first half of the sentence remains just as true with or without the second half of the sentence. He did not say that he is not a Jew. He would have to disavow Jewishness for us to consider him not a Jew. You are not "erring on the side of cautiousness" when you strip him of the Jewishness that he asserts. You are just "erring."