"Interesting evidence that Georgia will eventually recognize == 

 An Estonian newspaper conducted an interview with the PM of Georgia, and very thoughtfully posted an mp3 of the relevant part of the interview (which you can download and listen to), in which the PM says that ""in due course, Georgia will recognize Kosovo"" and the reason why they haven't already is that they've ""...been busy, very busy.""  The interview and article are in English.     
 :Direct quote from the article you've posted..... ""After that press conference, a spokesman for the Georgian PM came out and said that the PM “was misinterpreted” by the journalist."" The Foreign Minister of Georgia has said that his country is united (across party lines) in its opposition to recognizing Kosovo and Metohija as an independent state. It would be really counter-productive for Georgia to recognize considering the situation with Abkhazia and South Ossetia.   
 ::Yes, I listened to the mp3, they were speaking English and he DID say that Georgia would recognize.  I do not see how he could have been ""misinterpreted.""  Further, I did not say that recognition was imminent or even that it would actually happen.  You may have noticed that the title of my little section here says, ""evidence that Georgia will eventually recognize.""  I didn't say, 'ZOMG Georgia is recognizing!!!!111lol!!11! We gotta change teh article right nows!""  I put the link up because it was interesting and relevant.  Countries do things all the time that don't make any sense.    
 :::Well according to the article the opposition party broke the news in Georgia about the remarks the PM made to an obsure Estonian journalist, and immediately afterwards the government was backtracking from the bizarre comments. It would be diplomatic suicide for them to recognize Kosovo because Russia, Serbia, and non-NATO countries would respond by recognizing Abkhazia and South Ossetia and only God knows what would happen after then.  
 ::::Canadian Bobby you cease to amaze me. That's all the proof I needed. You really think America is going to let Georgia into NATO without first recognizing Rep. of Kosova?    
 :::::Ahem. This is not a forum, friends. Let's limit ourselves to improving the article text.    
 ::::::If these claims were denied by Georgian Government I also see no point in further discussion on this issue as Wikipedia indeed is not a forum. There are many reasons for this to happen among others that Georgian PM is not fluent in English. Condoleezza Rice for an example said in Russian she will be running for a president but after realizing what she said she explained it was a misunderstanding.    
 ::::::::He has better english than me. That also wasn't a slip he mentioned something about being coordinated with his allies.    
 :::::::::I think I'll choose to trust Georgian Government over a claim by IP user.   
 :::::::::: Avala isn't the Georgian PM part of the ""Georgian Government""? You can hear the Georgian PM say ""in the do course we will recognize Kosova as our friends in Europe. The reporter asks if he is worried that Kosova, the PM quickly disrupts him and says that [Kosova] ""is no precedent..."" and goes on to draw parallel between Slobodan Milosevic and Georgian government. You provide that an advisor to Cuba is an official stance but an audio interview between Georgian PM talking about Kosova's due recognition and an Estonian reporter is not enough to constitute a reaction?    PS: The Georgian PM is speaking perfect English. 
 Do you understand that there was a reaction, a denial from Georgian Government afterwards? I am not doubting the interview but if they denied it what is the point of further discussion? Should we list Condoleezza Rice under presidential candidates for what she said even though she later explain a misunderstanding. I don't know why or what Georgian PM said and meant but if he denied Georgia was about to recognize what are we discussing here? We could add ""Georgian PM said in an inter