:Hello, Adraen. By new title, do you mean a new section? Or a completely new article? 

 :We can certainly add more material on former glaciation of the Himalaya. Right now, the article is not very detailed. If we add a lot of detail about former glaciation, then the article would become unbalanced. We can possibly create a new article out of the new material. 

 :It is important that new material be supported by multiple reliable sources, especially if a new article is created. Relying on a single source has a very real risk of violating the Neutral point of view rule - we need to make sure that the material about paleoglaciation reflects scientific consensus, and gives due weight to minority views and reports on controversy. 

 :Concretely, I summarized the previous material, only removing the long list of ancient glaciers, and the excessive citations to Matthias Kuhle. I removed the long list, because the out-of-context list was not helpful to our readers. See the guideline about indiscriminate information. I removed the excessive citations to Kuhle, because Wikipedia is not a collection of links, and the addition of 17 references by  seemed like a conflict of interest. 

 :Please feel free to expand on the current article, understanding the guidelines that I used to remove and summarize the old material. I would suggest not simply reverting, but adding material that offers insight to our readers. —