On the talk page i have fully explained myself and backed up with a third party reference, legal document and scriptural reference. You are disputing a succession which is clear and direct just like the monarchy of a country. I will be reverting your version, i urge you to review the talk page. Also it does seem that as moksha88 has been requesting you for help that you have been more inclined towards his edits, i hope this is not the case. Succession dispute should not arise as it is clear and baps successorship claim is an interpretation and i have proven this on many a occassion on the talk page. Please do read all the comments on the talk page. Let me know what is considered as a accepted reference as at this moment in time ou do not seem to be accepting a third party reference, legal document nor scriptural reference. BAPS has a section on the page under the correct title i believe let me know what you think is wrong with my edit.