" 
 ::I'll be candid: getting people to review non-photographic material is hard enough already.  I expect 10-20% of my restorations to tank at en:wiki FPC for irrelevant reasons, and I expect greater than 50% of them to tank at Commons FPC for irrelevant reasons.  Currently one reviewer over there is asking me to crop the floor plan out of a manuscript baroque architectural design, so the remainder would look more like photography.  And that's one of the serious reviewers (I get non-serious ones too).  If you'd like to take up restoration, great.  Please do.  We need more restorationists.  In the meantime please be mindful of the waters I swim in.  I recently had to readd a hand-tinted etching from 1789 to the article about the storming of the Bastille, because even though it was already featured some editors didn't think it was important.  When I restored the original twelfth army situation map from D-Day, some editors didn't want it in their articles about D-Day.  Do you really think this work needs more hurdles to acceptance? '''' "