" 

  
 == Iggy Pop == 

 I beleive a  tag would have been more appropriate here.    
 *Maybe, but I had no idea what this person was trying to say. Only when they put it in the third time did I realize that ""Iggy"" might be the subject, not some idiot schoolmate of this idiot. Hey, are you hounding me? Oh, my regards again to the fam. We were just discussing this morning how much we'd like the four-year old to be two years old again for an hour. Enjoy it while you can, K! Haha,    
 ::Well we will be at least another two years till we have another two year old...where does the time go?  Hey? Have you considered autoarchiving?  Boba Phat is still on here, and while I know he was crucial to the project, that was months ago!  Plus it takes me forever to scroll down this far on my iPod....So when are you coming to NS?  It is prime lobster season, although we both missed the Lobster Carnival.     
 :::Appologies for the let down, I had actually expected you to correct that for me, in fact I was going to leave a note when I left it asking you to.  I must make Lobster Carnival a blue link (if I can), because I was under the impression that there would be lobsters riding Ferris Wheels and merry-go-rounds, but when I got pictures from Mrs. K (I could not attend, for obvious reasons), I was saddly dissappointed.  I must inform others that the event might not be what they expect it to be.  I have also been trying to gather enough information to create an article on Pictou county pizza (a style of pizza, not a brand), but have come up short once again (that's what she said).   

 == See also == 
 Sorry about the RVV label; I have been barely sweeping articles for the last few years, after spending 3 years creating 100s of them. It's a lot of work to keep up on that many, and honestly, when I see an editor who has never edited the article before come along and wipe out large portions of link sections I almost automatically assume it's vandalism, revert it, then move along. Sorry to lump your concerned effort with those. • Freechild''''  
 *Sure thing, Freechild. Thanks for your noteand I hope you like the feather I stuck in your cap.    

 ==Discussion== 
 Against my word and yours we need to discuss this, civilly and calmly.  We are obviously going to get nowhere with snarky comments and edit warring.  So, how do you want to solve this?  At present, there is no consensus for either inclusion or non-inclusion, as it has no been actively discussed.  The inclusion is something that has just happened over time.  I feel we should have (at ANI for more eyes) a discussion on this and work something out.  We aren't going to get anywhere but blocked, both of us, if we continue to spit snarky comments at each other and revert each others edits.  So, truce? -  •  •  
 *Homer, I haven't yet forgotten that you called me a ""petty, arrogant troll""on this same talk page. I make good-faith efforts to improve articles that you hadn't even edited before, and you are obviously following me and reverting me (blindly reverting me at WIAT also removed a valid maintenance template, and you know it). And no, I am not going to get blocked over this: every time you warn me about 3RR, you're the one at 3, not me.Now, there is progress in your message: you say there is no consensus for either inclusion or exclusion. By that I think you mean ""no consensus in the TV station project""which is correct, but that's not all that matters. What I want from you, before we go anywhere, is the acknowledgment that Wikipedia's policies on BLPs and directories apply across the board, since I can not agree to anything that allows unverified information to stand. You have brought forth a few arguments for the reasonability of some of that information. I can see the possibility of a compromise there, where it concerns current staffbut why don