Marcel Lefebvre was a holy man and his name should not be discredited when there is legitimate concern that he was not automatically excommunicated.  His offense caused an automatic excommunication only if an exception did not apply, and arguably an exception did apply, since the Church was and is still in a state of general apostasy.  It is biased and unfair to call him excommunicated when he in fact may not have been automatically excommunicated.  You compare him with apostates and heretics.  He committed no heresy.  Look up heresy for a definition of it, and you will see that Marcel Lefebvre never changed doctrine.  What was his supposed crime other than continuing to preach the Faith and live a Catholic life as people had done for centuries.  And for that you claim he is as guilty as Henry VIII, who murdered countless people and asserted himself as Head of a Church??