== The Corley Conspiracy == 

 Keep Notable work with requisite coverage. Also interesting (but not a requirement, as it's qualifies on its own) in relation to Mike Corley, Andy Dingley 

 How can Wikipedia possible be taken seriously by providing a platform for an obviouisly seriously sick and deluded individual? From the Wikipedia General notability guideline 'substantive coverage in reliable sources'. Do you seriously include decades of Usenet typing as reliable ? By what criteria does this qualify as a 'notable work', it belongs in the Fortian Times or the National Enquirer.