::::I'm not sure if your search is showing everything Chalker states. For example, regarding this edit, like I stated, that is actually backed by Chalker. See this link. She also makes this clear in this and this source, which are also in the article. And, no, Malleus, I don't expect you to be making these corrections. I was simply stating that, since you are copyediting that section, I of course understand if you remove Chalker from any line that isn't supported by her. Again, I apologize for this error and will look for more in the article.