Erm... except that, in this particular complaint, the OP is right. The text indeed is misleading, the fact that the Pope requested changing the statue is historically accurate, and therefore this particular edit the OP had made was pertinent and correct, whereas the reversion of his edition back to an unreferred, ambiguously written statement was unjustified and unjustifiable. At the very least in this particular case, the OP's correction was correct and needed, and should be restored.