:::::::oK Clueless, thank you. You and I remain in agreement about how this article should be changed. Promoting the false notion that these edits are "subliminal" should be corrected. My feeling is that since Subliminal editing in the Exorcist has still not been proven, there is no need to violate any Wikipedia rules about OR. As I've said several times now, I believe the points Hal has made are moot, since the original source used was never reliable. There are no grounds to "demand" sources to disprove something that was never proven in the first place, or to assume a more authority over this issue than you or I. Either way, you and I are in agreement, which I believe makes consensus. I encourage you to go ahead and re-write the paragraph at this point. If making this simple contribution continues to be such an enormous problem then perhaps we can get some objective help.