::::::“Why are you still attempting a rebuttal?”  Why should I not attempt a rebuttal?  

 ::::::“It's clear you are ignorant as evidence [sic] by your absurd claim about CDs and players."  What absurd claim?  Absurd claims such as those made in The Audio Critic?  Absurd claims such as those made in the Boston Audio Society?  Absurd claims such as those made at http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx.htm? 

 ::::::"’You and all the other subjectivists can go on...’  Personal attack?”  Where is the personal attack? 

 ::::::“You are also profoundly biased in your opinions.”  Profoundly biased in favour of evidence.  Profoundly biased against nonsense.   

 ::::::“I've also read that you think an encyclopedia should attack it's [sic] subject whenever it's deserved.  That absolutely [sic] ridiculous in that you mean the encyclopedia [sic] should attack it's [sic] subject whenever YOU think it should.”  Please do not try to put words in my mouth.  Please read Wikipedia articles like those on Hitler and Stalin.  Wikipedia allows articles to be critical of its subject as long as what is written is supported by citations to reliable sources.  

 ::::::“Get out of the way and let OBJECTIVE people do their job instead of constantly trying to interject with your ranting hatreds.”  Thank you for your kind invitation, but I prefer to continue to edit the article.