== Death of Wikipedia....No violence intended == 

 Wikipedia, to me, once was a valuable resource.  I often find myself dwelling on a question, which I was unable to readily provide an adequate answer.  I, however, pride myself on being able to answer a great deal of inquiries with some degree of knowledge.  As a youth I had encyclopedias.  And later I had all the resources of the internet at my fingertips.  And alas came Wikipedia.  Time and time again it surfaced as a top search result, obviously from the outcome of a solid understanding of the workings of the net.  I began to trust its information, and liked the community contribution aspect of the site. 

 I have often been satisfied with the communal postings of Wikipedia.  BUT, as of late, have noticed a strong bias.  It is a sad thing to see such a promising asset wash away, but away it will wash. 

 I have had legitimate postings cleared by persons with higher user designations than myself.  The ones in ultimate control of the site, are all cut from the same stone.  I've been attacked and criticized for my contributions.   

 I have come to know this site as biased. 

 The all mighty Barrack Obama listing is now locked.  NO more community effort?  I thought Communist was a derivative of Community!?   

 I guess we'll just make up the rules when they seem to serve the agenda. 

 bye bye wikipedia....you almost had something.... 

 now die....[please note...i don't want people to die....just an intangible thing such as a website in this instance.....to die.....die you website you] 
 the above is all said in jest....but seriously .....i hope you don't make another penny.  

 but seriously... at the same time.... i don't want you to think i'm a radical or anything and rat me out to the pigs....you bunch of truth hiding fake wiki'ers.   

 thanks comrades