, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 
 ::::::I think that Simoes is right, but then that means that, if this list is to remain in article space, it has to follow the same guidelines that articles do.  It has to be NPOV and using V and RS.  I personally don't think Acupuncture has V and RS that state that it is PS.  Everything I have read shows me that any reliable source that I have read recognizes ACU for exactly what it is, an interesting modality with centuries of data that needs more study.  Period.  Nobody would call it PS unless they had a vested interest in saying so.  It may belong on other lists, but not PS. Just because TCM created models to help them decide how to treat, doesn't mean they didn't use good solid thinking to come up with those models.  We just don't know that, yet.  It needs more study.  It needs to be stated that way.  To say anything else is to stifle true scientific thought and investigation.  How can we advance mankind (which is the purpose of science) when we poopoo things before they are studied properly. This encyclopedia should not do that either.  16:31