Much of this appears to be primary sources and original research, but regarding the source you are referring to, I think it is completely appropriate to contest using it for controversial claims. It's one of the most in-depth biographies on her, but it's clearly not terribly neutral. Barrons is definitely the better source and its summary is pretty similar to the one we have currently. Anyways, once the RFC is done and the predictable ruling is passed down, I'll go ahead and take the GA route. I think it's ready though a bit on the skimpy side. My COI GAs are always a bit slimmer than most volunteer submissions due to the community's double-standards.