:: Okay, I'll work on that after I do this (probably tomorrow).   

 : Also, I'll put a bullet point here for things I cite or change.  I want to discuss some things that are obscurely cited and not very notable, too.  I suppose that there could be some opposition to some things I remove, so we can discuss them here edit by edit.   

 * Okay, in looking through the uncited info, I question the notability of a lot of this stuff.  It is really notable that he "came under fire during an ambush by Iraqi paramilitary forces?"  He's in the army in an armed conflict.  Is it really notable that the 101st was expected to go to Baghdad?  Or that it didn't?  Are these pieces of information really important to Petraeus' story?  The first paragraph in the Iraq (2003-2004) section should be shortened to end after the word "Najaf."  It is notable that the Petraeus commanded the 101st during the drive to Baghdad.  It is notable that Rick Atkinson wrote a book about it.  It's not notable that the 101st participated in an armed feint toward Hilla to cover the 3rd Infantry Division.  This is more like information that belongs in a Unabridged History of Battle Plans and Troop Movement During the Iraq War (2003).    

 * The second paragraph in the Iraq (2003-2004) is full of even less notable information than the first paragraph.  Furthermore, it reads like a book.  Indeed, it was during the year after the invasion that Petraeus and the 101st gained fame for their performance in Iraq  "Indeed," really?  That's not encyclopedic.  The same can be said about "The 101st was not, as had been expected, called upon to lead urban combat in Baghdad" in the first paragraph.  Rephrase it to "The 101st didn't lead urban combat in Baghdad."  After that's done, delete it, because it's not important.  "the most competitive man on earth" and "phenomenal at getting people to reach their potential" quotes are also not very notable, considering that the first is an unnamed subordinate, and the other is just unsourced.  Source 9 (from opinionjournal, WSJ editorial page) also doesn't seem like an entirely reliable source.    

 * Iraq (2005-2007) has him spending his time in Kansas overseeing schools and writing a book.  It's misleading to say that this timeframe should be in a broader section under Iraq.    

 * I would recommend splitting the Iraq section into three parts: Petraeus Commands the 101st in Iraq, Petraeus Commands MNSTC-I, and Petraeus Commands MNF-I.  The 2005-2007 section could be incorporated into the Army Career section.  Thoughts?   

 * Incorporate the Peacekeeping section into the Army Career section?  I see no reason why this paragraph belongs in a different section. It's only adding another 15-20% to the length of that section.   

 Yes, I know I've overreached what I was intending to address with this round of edits, but up until 2007, this Iraq section is quite long for the amount of notable information it contains.