Consensus? I don't play that wiki game where you pretend that it's all about the rules and consensus. You know as well as I do that it's all about who takes a personal POV position on a particular article. To argue anything else is asking someone to ignore the wholesale exceptions on virtually *every* wiki article. It's all a power game by people who have no control over most aspects of their lives; so they come here and be complete assholes to people to make themselves feel better. There's no mystery to why things are so uneven as to quality of content - people (like myself) who have expert level knowledge of particular subjects don't like it when a complete ignoramus with a inferiority complex reverts HOURS of work on an article because of some nit-picky BS - instead of just fixing it themselves. That's how you know that they don't give one fuck for the fidelity of the information. If they fucking cared at ALL, they would fix instead of lazily reverting things like the cowardly punks they are. 

 How many THOUSANDS of doctors, PHDs, Scientists, historians, etc have you stupid fucks run off because you reverted HOURS of their freely contributed time over a protocol /wording / formatting issue? 

 But you don't care about that, do you? All you can see is the rules - because they are YOUR rules and you get your jollies on "protecting" wikipedia. Well fuck you - having autistic fucks in charge of ANYTHING always leads to a complex maze of rules that exclude the very people that you need to breathe lift into a thing. Because of course a big time scientist who wishes to contribute should of COURSE spend weeks familiarizing themselves with all the finer points of wikipedia protocol and politics before they even change a comma - else some 19 year old peice of shit with undo the work they so generously contributed. 

 I myself am a polymath (look it up) and could have been over the last eight years been improving the content over a huge swath of subjects - but pointy headed fucks have run me off each time. 

 It's time to stop pretending about what wikipedia really is. What is it really? The personal domain of damaged individuals who like rules for rule's sake, who enjoy being the "guardians" of what is so, and what is not so. It's just small-minded people who are completely intellectually dishonest; and who have personal ax's to grind - all while hiding their motives behind a unending web of overlapping rules and best practices. 

 And anyone who is involved is complicit.