:::::::::::::No problem: your reaction was quite understandable given that definition of the word. That wasn't what I meant when I said "misquote". I apologize for not following my own advice and clarifying the definition of "misquote" earlier, which might have saved a lot of time and trouble.  I should have known to do that.  As I sometimes say, one benefit of my giving people advice is that sometimes I follow it myself (whether or not anyone else does). And I apologize for saying things using the word "misquote" which could easily be interpreted as accusations of things you didn't actually do. 
 :::::::::::::I would now like to change the heading "G-Dett has misquoted Jayjg" on the workshop page. Would it be an improvement if I change it to "G-Dett has mischaracterized what Jayjg said"? You might want to suggest different wording. (I realize you still may not agree with the statement, though, and I might not necessarily accept wording you suggest.)  I assume this part is OK since it doesn't use the word "misquote": "G-Dett has stated that Jayjg said things, which were inaccurate representations of what Jayjg actually said".  I'm not sure whether I should change the heading "G-Dett cautioned about quoting", perhaps to "G-Dett cautioned about assertions about Jayjg's position".  I'm also going to reply to your comment on the workshop page. ☺