== Reverting my entries for Collaze - Is this fair? == 

 I spent days working like a maniac, perfecting each and every little thing, so that people like me who want to work on collaborative fiction get a nice tool to do so. And when I put information about the website in relevant pages, I find that you come in and take everything out without even taking a look at the site. At the same time the same wiki pages are having links to several poorly designed and technologically inferior sites, some existing purely to make advertising revenue. How can you revert a link without looking at it? And what do you mean by self-promotion? So if I tell someone to post for me you will be fine. I had the feeling that wikipedia.org is a free and fair place, but your editing has clearly showed that there are forces behind the scene to filter out any sites that don't have the investor millions to create propaganda but simply provide an excellent service. Well, I am not going to bother adding the site back, but surely urge you to reconsider what you have done. 

 Thanks 
 Ambika Sukla 
 Founder, Collaze 

 :I'm uncertain whether fairness is as much a consideration as notability is. While it appears to be down at the moment, I did actually look at the site at the time. I'm afraid that adding your site counts as self-promotion, which as I , is not permitted as a matter of policy, which I only enforce. Sorry. If you see any commercial or personal links that you feel are not up to par, I encourage you to remove them.