August 2010 (UTC) 
 ::::::::::::::: Okay, it was not clear that you were referring to the section "Danger wage premium." First, I did not pick the title "Is there a danger wage premium?" The title was in the article long before I started editing. So I have nothing to do with this title which you (and that is you and nobody else) see as "passive-aggressive." The U.S. Bureau of Labor and dozens of studies (that I know of) about wage compensation for risks say that there is no danger wage premium or that the compensation is negative because the market is not perfectly transparent and competitive . Therefore, the title "Is there a danger wage premium?" seems more appropriate than the title "Danger wage premium." But if you insist on "Danger wage premium" (and can provide one or two reasons for this), I will not object to your edits.   12:02, 22