::::::::I can't be convinced that it's a BLP issue, per what I stated above. I don't see why a simple phrase saying something like "Bradley later confirmed that his analysis was erroneous and that the person who conducted the search did so only once" should be presented in the Trial section when it makes it seem as though this was presented at trial. It was not. Therefore, I am not seeing why it should be there. If we were leaving this information out completely, then I could see your "BLP violation" claim. But as it stands, I do not.