REPLY TO ETHNIC COMPOSITION 

 You were criticising "some" Western sources for mentioning of over-representation of Serbs in the JNA. The truth is that they are "all standard sources" about the reality of the JNA and its ethnic composition. Over-representation of Serbs in the JNA is nothing bad for this Encyclopedia or from scientific point of view.  
 One or two members in the high command does not give you absolute power over the army or the state. The Prime Minister of the rump Yugoslavia (in 1998) was a Montegrin (Momir Bulatovic). Are you trying to say that the high command was equally shared between Serbs and Montegrins, even though the number of Serb population was many times higher than the Montenegrins (at least 10 times, i.e. 6.5 million Serbs vs. some few houndred thousands Montenegrins in Serbia and Montenegro). Yet Bulatovic was only a formal man and he is not accused of war crimes. Many in lower ranks from rump Yugoslavia were, including among other Slobodan Milosevic who was indicted even for war crimes while he was President of Serbia.The current President of Serbia and Montenegro is a Montegrin (Svetozar Marovic). What does this high command means. If the Serbs want to do something, can Mr. Marovic stop them because he is President?    

 You do not dare to look at other sources because they tell you the truth. You mentioned only ONE reference, probably a non-standard work writen by your friend. Veljko Kadijevic was a declared 'Yugoslav'. Again, he was one man as was the Croat Zvonko Jurijevic, the commander of the Air Force. But who controlled air bases and used the aircrafts? You sidestep other sources such as my reference to the official statistics of SKJ (i.e. LCY). I hope you understand the title of the Kongres ‘Šta pokazuju istraživanja SKJ’. It means: What Does the Research of LCY Show? That Kongress was held in Belgrade and included members of LCY from all nationalities of Yugoslavia. The document is the official one and it was the product of all LCY members, including the Serbs which showed that they are over-repsented.  
 You give evidence from websites which you may create days and nights, such as blogspots or any geocities, chats etc. Wikipedia cannot rely on these junk mails.  

 It is true that the JNA was dissolved into fighting fractions as you said, but the Serbs controlled the war arsenal. Croatia might have never needed Leopard tanks from Germany had it acquired a significant proportion of them from the JNA. When the JNA withdrew peacefully from Macedonia, it left almost no heavy weapons behind. Macedonia has imported all the tanks for its army from Bulgaria.  

 You have a tendecy of manipulating this Excellent and Neutral Encyclopedia for nationalist propaganda. We find plenty of examples when peoples of former Yugoslavia disagree between themselves and engage in a propaganda war and revisionism. For example, Serb nationalists refer to the crimes of Ustasi against the Serbs during WWII, but do not want to recognise what many Serbs did during the 1990s. 
 Here is my NPOV: 

 Ustasi committed genocide against Serbs in WWII . 
 Serbs committed ethnic cleansing and genocide in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo. 
 Croats committed some ethnic cleansing in revenge against the Serbs in Krajina in 1995.  
 The JNA was in the hands of Serbs in the early 1990s. Me and you could have been in the high command. Who committed the genocide? Where did the Serbs get the weapons? 

 There is nothing I have to disagree with you here. But your attempt to deteriorate relaity and make Serbs under-represented in this or that level of JNA, I am afraid is wrong, against the truth, available evidence and facts. Are you putting the truth in trial? 

 With my best regards