:::::::My interpretation is that agreement to leave these articles merged hinges upon Polaron's criteria, which include that the "place" and the "HD" be "substantially the same".  In this case, Doncram has repeatedly asked for provision of some specific reference to support that.  He has finally given in and agreed to include the assertion without this reference (which Polaron has stated would be added later), in order to come to some conclusion and move on.  Replacing "substantially the same" to "is the site of" returns this article to a category of articles not included in Polaron's criteria for merging.  Doncram is not agreeing that any "place" that "is the site of" a HD should be merged.  On the one hand, I'll admit that it took me a while to see this disticntion....on the other hand, Doncram, as he always does, is struggling to establish and maintain some systematic, mutually acceptable way to proceed forward and establish a framework for NRHP development.  In the absence of the reference and some positive assertion of sameness, the wording becomes the only expression of why this article differs from some other article where the HD is just some small part of a "place", as opposed to "substantially the same".