:* Let me illustrate the point with a reductio ad absurdum. The Flat Earth Society gives a list of 100 reasons why the Earth is flat (this is a proposition, for the sake of argument). Now, I go to the FES article and copy-paste the 100-item list there, because: 

 ::* That is the article of the FES 
 ::* The FES said this and that about this and that 
 ::* Is the FES saying sourced? Yes: it is sourced. 

 :: ...therefore, the FES saying belongs in the FES article. Yes? NO. No, because it goes against WP:NOT#SOAPBOX and WP:NOR. The FES article must reflect FES's opinions about Earth being flat, not act as a loudspeaker for their propaganda on the subject. Please read carefully what is excluded regarding original research, and also WP:SYN, and see how they apply exactly to the situation at hand. I am tired of arguing the same again and again. Your (Randroide) only excuse is "but the AVT actually said that", which is irrelevant. Wikipedia can not include all the ravings of any lunatic mind, just because the lunatic mind is notable and deserves an article. Risking Godwin's Law to be called upon me, I'll say that the whole content of Mein Kampf should not be copy-pasted into Adolf Hitler's article, just because he wrote it. I am calling upon a votation below to settle the issue. —