== Edits to page on Cosmic Inflation == 

 Howdy, 

 Thanks for correcting what was awkward, in first paragraph, and trying to make it better.  That article could use some stramlining, for sure, as many parts are confusing.  One edit you made was to remove my word believed (probably mis-spelled) and I made some commentary on the Talk page, which I copied below.  In my opinion,it might make sense to insert some conditional, but I invite your comment.  People coming to this subject from Astrophysics background might differ with String Theory and Particle Physics guys on the subject, about what is proven fact, and what's still just theory.  I see you are frequent contributor and ardent editor.  Keep up the good work! 
 

 I recently made an edit to the sentence in the first paragraph, to generalize usage of the term Inflaton, which made it more closely reflect Wikipedia's entry.  I also inserted the word believed (possibly mis-spelled), and it was recently deleted.  Is there a clear consensus with this body of editors, regarding whether the Scalar field (or constant B-field) referred to as the Inflaton is regarded as a fact?  I thought that; at this point it is considered an abstraction which is convenient in String Theory and M-Theory, to account for the observed properties of Cosmic Inflation.  I would like to state that there are some perfectly reasonable Inflationary Universe theories currently being considered, which do not employ the Inflaton.  It seems a bit gratuitous to present it as a fact, therefore.