== How Dare You == 

 How dare you call my contributions nonsense when you people just sit around wasting your time, apprehending vandals for what? For a quixotic dream of creating a "perfect" encyclopedia. Why don't you guys check the more popular articles, such as movies, books, e.g. Harry Potter Bk. 6, instead of spending your time shooting down vandals and trolls, deleting worthless articles, finding "worthless" articles to delete, politicking, nit-picking, whatnot. Why not? WHY THE HECK NOT? Are you all just useless hypocrites, sitting around doing nothing of importance? You are here for a reason, and that is not to make friends and chat all day long. That's why Yahoo Messenger was invented. 

 Think about it. You'll be hearing from me in the future, so I guess you better not ignore this, or I'll upload a virus into one of the media files. Either this project shapes up or ships out. I'm fed up with your relaxed behaviours, your boring routine of blocking, deleting, blocking, deleting, adding the occasional stub, when there are so many articles in immediate need of cleaning. I was under the impression that all the articles in a professional, free encyclopedia were supposed to be grammatically correct, completely devoid of serious grammatical and typographical errors. Oh, sorry, am I wrong? Then maybe I should cease calling your project an encyclopedia. Maybe I should say "it's a jumbled-up mish-mash of facts, thrown together by people from all walks of life. Professional? Oh, it's quite far from that, really, you see..." to other newcomers. Nice turnoff, right? Well, it happens to be true, unless you start the change that could spell all the difference between a jumbled-up mish-mash of facts and a professionally written and constructed source of information. 

 Think about it.