* There is a "Recognition" section here but no "Criticisms" or "Controversies" section.  Obviously this politician is nonetheless at least somewhat controversial if her nomination to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was pulled.  Furthermore, most of these recognitions are dubious... she delivered a commencement address etc... is this really distinctive?  That Warren and Scott Brown were back to back Bostonian of the Year is interesting information in itself, and it could go into both BLPs, with the only reason for it not going into Brown's BLP is because it is not yet determined who his Democrat opponent is going to be.  Scott Brown is far from irrelevant to Warren's life and politics from this point on.  In any case, I see this as a conflict between NPOV and relevancy; if the NPOV leaves readers more informed, better to err on the side of being more informative.  Pare back this section in favour of an explanation for why she was considered too anti-business to be named head of the Bureau and it would not be as necessary to consider POV correctives to these sorts of details.