::As a devotee of the show, I happen to completely agree with Masem. There is nothing inherently POV about including positive or negative perceptions of the show, and while there are probably better sources on the subject than Breitbart's piece, to say that "criticizing something as weird is totally out of Wikipedia's standards" is grossly inaccurate of the nature of wikipedia. Number one: Wikipedia is not censored: As the article stands now, Ms. (magazine) basically called Princess Celestia an allusion to white supremacy, so I don't see how calling bronies "weird" would be in any way unacceptable in wikipedia standards. Secondly, in terms of WP:WEIGHT one or two statements on how the brony phenomenon is unappealing to some doesn't even overwhelm the section, let alone the entire article. The National review is a reliable source (which comments on Breitbart's blog, even though I wouldn't consider Breitbart's blog noteworthy in and of itself). If there is to be inclusion on negative perceptions, it should come from more reputable sources. But to say any source which labels the show or its fanbase as "weird" or "creepy" is unacceptable is ludicrous.