::::Wikipedia is founded on the principle of respecting people's edits.  You have an opinion that this template is superfluous (despite its popularity).  If reverting an edit that has completely accurate information and solely for enforcing your opinion is not taking reverting lightly I don't know what is. Maybe you could give an example of what you think taking reverting lightly is, and how it differs from what you did. And I quote from the wikipedia page "Do not simply revert changes that are made as part of a dispute. Be respectful to other editors, their contributions and their points of view." -