:Let's talk about what needs to be done, specifically, to polish off this article. The criticisms are essentially: 
 :# Historical overview section needs expansion 
 :# Criticisms section needs expansion 
 :# There are too many lists of people/concepts 
 :# We need mention of Bayesian methods 
 :Aren't lists appropriate, as the Statistics article serves as an introduction and a jumping-off point for anyone reading WP articles on statistics? Furthermore, what other topics should go in history/criticisms? How much should we say about Bayesian stuff here? Can someone make a concrete outline?