::Re:[Controversiality and centrality of the means warrant prioritization over the goals.] 
 ::Birth control and extermination were only enacted as means to something that was considered to be important;  the goals were more central to the philosophy than the means, same as in any philosophy.  

 ::Wikipedia precedent is to first describe even controversial topics as valid topics, and then describe controversiality.  According to this, controversiality wouldn't be a reason to prioritize means over description of the philosophy itself (why they want to change hereditary characteristics). 

 ::The order of intro points at stem cells, another controversial topic, reflects this precedent:  1. Stem cells are replenishing cells.  2. Researchers hope to use them to cure diseases.  3. Embryonic stem cell research controversially destroys embryos.  The topic is only widely known because of its controversiality, but this isn't sufficient reason to prioritize that over a complete description of the research (why researchers are interested in stem cells).  

 ::The nazism article also does not prioritize controversiality.   
 ===Tom Shakespeare===