== neutrality issue? == 

 I've just read the post, along with the warning that the main writer's links to the film production may make the article less than neutral.  So far as I can tell, no opinions are expressed in the article about the movie, only a few dry facts, with no language that I could find to be biased in either direction - neither for nor against the film, and neither bolstering nor discrediting the story depicted in the film.  What specifically is the point of view issue called into question?  If the only problem is the writer's connection to the film creators, well, it seems that the writer has done a very good job of hiding any favoritism or criticism, and has simply stuck to the neutral facts.  Don't consider the writer guilty by association; look at what is actually written.  Just because someone works for a chocolate chip cookie maker doesn't make that person biased when it is their turn to explain what a chocolate chip cookie is.