original research. –    
 ::::   Please see these links also support this controversy http://www.madhyamam.com/en/node/21600  http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/bollywood/hindu-organisation-seeks-ban-on-total-siyapaa_152012.html http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/news/2014/hindu-organisation-demands-ban-on-total-siyapaa-134077.html http://theoryoflife.com/connect/hindu-organisation-demands-ban-total-206/ http://www.rediff.com/movies/report/slide-show-1-hindu-organisation-seeks-ban-on-total-siyapaa/20140313.htm http://africanentertainer.com/india/news/hindu-organisation-demands-ban-on-total-siyapaa http://www.news.nom.co/hindu-organisation-seeks-ban-on-total-8338529-news/ http://www.news.nom.co/why-are-hindu-organisations-seeking-a-8338294-news/ http://www.news.nom.co/hindu-organisation-demands-ban-on-total-8338511-news/ http://www.news.nom.co/hindu-organisation-seeks-ban-on-total-8338735-news/ http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/hindu-organisation-seeks-ban-on-ali-zafar-yami-gautams-total-siyapaa/  and there are hundreds more link just google search it.    
 :::::* Huge heap of third-rate sources, with 2 rs's. Does any (the reliable ones, you see) of it contain the word controversy in it? Wikipedia editors cannot label anything as controversy unless explicitly stated by the source to be a controversy. –    
 ::::::* As for "there are hundreds more link just google search it" – shit of the World Wide Web does not find a place here. Plus the burden lies on you, the editor to add sources, not me.I have deliberately avoided using wl's because an editor of 8 years should know your policy on sourcing.  –    
    
 You call other users valid links unreliable but your links comes from sources which are unknown and can't be trusted   

 * Not done: There doesn't seem to be a consensus to include the suggested content at this time. — ''''''''''   

 == Protected edit request on 17 March 2014 == 

 {{edit protected||answered=yes