" 
 == The Signpost: 11 April 2011 == 

  

  
 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe ·    

  
 == May drive == 

 Hey, I started a rough draft for the next drive page.  I made some changes with regard to 2009 article awards, but I figure we should all discuss it a little more to make sure the changes are okay.  Let me know what you think.  Thanks. —   
 :Yes, I agree we should try this out this time and do it instead of a Requests page bonus. I have done a few edits. Thanks for getting this started.    

 == Bhikshatana == 

 Thanks for initiating the copyedit. I have fixed the typos in the lead.      
 :Thanks, I'll get going again on it after lunch.    
 ::I am done with the article, except had one more question, which I posted on the article talk page.    
 ::: That sentence that gone wrong horribly with typos and missing words. Please check again. When you are done, please add the GOCE tag on the talk and remove my note about GOCE pending from the GA nomination tag from the talk. Thanks.      
 :::: Thanks a lot.      

 == Trials and judicial hearings following the 2011 Egyptian revolution == 

 Hey Diannaa. How are you? Can you please copyedit the article? Its nominated to be ITN so it would great if you can do it  )     

 ==MfD RSMAS== 
 We have worked out a convoluted and perilous way to handle the RSMAS GA review, and I have added the deletion template.  But I asking you to be more understanding than Ryulong and allow me to continue contributing the articles and bringing them up the GA standards. Please change your vote so as to not create a precedent that would subject me to futher MfDs. Thanks,    
 :Sorry, I don't think I understand your question here. I object to people working on articles in a separate sandbox rather than in the main space, but I do not object to you contributing to articles whether they are up for promotion or not. There is no need for your work on this wiki to be convoluted or perilous, and I did not place any restrictions on your contributions. Perhaps you could enlighten me.    
 ::Another admin, not you, conditioned my text contributions on being submitted to a volunteer to be cleared before they are allowed to be posted in article space.  The procedure we have adopted is to put the text to be modified into a subpage, finalize it, and then have it cleared once, so as to not overwork the volunteer.  I have successfully used that procedure on other articles without objection until Ryulong objected within minutes of my copying over the RSMAS article. By forcing me to edit in article space, I have to trust the GA reviewer to clear each edit rather than my usual, highly-expert volunteer. I will probably should ask the volunteer to review it a second time at the end of the GA review to make sure that we did not miss anything. Thank you for your understand