18, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 

 ==Page protected== 
 I've protected the page because of the edit war. Please try to reach a compromise on the talk page, and when you're ready to edit again, either let me know or post a request for unprotection on WP:RfPP. Cheers,    
 :I won't be reverting any more until we reach a consensus on the talk page because right now it is 3 against 1 so it doesn't do any good - feel free to unprotect.   
 ::I'd like to add, some people looking at this talk page might just plain be so neutral on this whole issue we don't care much, I for one see the merit in adding Lewis's opinion on this matter, but it doesn't seem consistant when its added in like that, plus its a bit alone when the paragraph in question is supposed to be making a broad generalization about many people.   
 :::Okay, thanks, Standonbible. I'll unprotect.    

 ==External links - deletions== 
 I was reviewing the exterior links and deleted several for the following reasons: 
 :#  Evangelical Lutheran: there was an excellent link to a reformation site; redundant 
 :#  Questions answered by Campus Crusade for Christ: too narrow.  If we have this, then a site for every view of Christ out there should be listed: they were deleted not too long ago. 
 :#  Conservative Calvinist:  same reason as Luthern, we have a reformation site that should suffice. 
 :#  Sayings of Jesus:  This should go on Bible site; latin and english translation does not really belong here. 
 :#  Non denominational:  I may have deleted one of the two nondenominational sites listed.  It my have been the Smith Bible dictionary on a site not limited to the article. 

 My intention was not to "ding" any one group, but rather to limit the number so that other groups do not feel obligated to add their site to the list so that their specific view of Christ is also listed.  This list used to be quite extensive and was pared down not too many weeks past; I think we should keep this limited, remove redundancies, and close the door on sites more appropirate for missionary work than providing an explanation.  That's my story and I am sticking with it.  Thoughts?     
 :Fair enough. (I've been away for a while and hadn't noticed the link spam.    20: