" 

 == Image:Napier-Red-Tape.jpg == 

 FYI, please see User talk:Nv8200p#An old image closure: Image:Napier-Red-Tape.jpg. By the way, I came across this image purely by chance today (honestly, right now I even don't remember how) and didn't notice you were the uploader until after I'd made the replacement. Anyway, I hope you'll agree with my action here, and don't take this as anything confrontational.    

 == FPAS RFC == 
 As a participant in the recent discussion at WP:ANI, I thought you should be informed of the new RFC that another user has started regarding FPAS's behavior.   
 *Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Future Perfect at Sunrise 
 '   ¤   

 == Art Brut External Links == 
 I got your message. I dont necessarily agree or disagree. But I have put the matter on the talk page of the article so that others can comment. I suspect most will support your view of the Raw Vision link but did feel the need for further input. No disrespect intended. Kind Regards    

 == Thank you for the barn star! == 

 And it's my birthday as well! Thank you very much. I exist always on the precipice of going OFF on Ottex, but my true interest is solidly in making a better article.\  \  \  \  

 == Image == 

 Hi, one editor tagged the Image:Girl sufferedwithburnwounds.jpg for speedy deletion. I am not well-versed with images. Could you please look if the image copyright is ok or not. '   
 :I checked the commons page, there is not speedy deletion tag in commons page. But the articles in which the image is present, showing the image is a candidate for speedy deletion. '   
 ::See Persecution_of_Christians#Persecution_of_Christians_in_India. The caption below the image shows ""This image is a candidate for speedy deletion. It may be deleted after Friday, 12 September 2008"". '   

 ::The  source has been added now and wasn't linked when I tagged it. I request you not to consider my edit to hide CLEAR facts. I sympathize with Namrata - the little girl. But I don't let emotions and solidarity overwhelm my wiki-edits. The image was unsourced and hence I nominated it for relatively speedy deletion. Wikipedia needs such images to depict gruelling violence but not at the cost of copyright infringement. Thanks.  '  

 :: I still doubt the source which is Rev. Abhiram Singh 's picasa account. '  

 :::I have no view on the legitimacy of the source. You put a notice on the image thumbnail in the article that it was due for speedy deletion, but there was no nomination for speedy deletion on the main image itself. The latter must be done to make anything happen; the former is merely a courtesy notice. Also if you think it should be deleted, that must be done on Commons, not on Wikipedia. If you go to the image page you will see it has been transcluded from the Commons and is not hosted here. '''''  

 ::What are you saying? See this edit. I had put the notice on the main image itself. '  
 :::Did you not notice when you clicked ""edit"" that you got a blank edit box? That's because, as I've said above, the image isn't hosted on wikipedia. You can't delete it here, because it