Neither of you are answering my questions: 
 *Do you accept my description of what happened? 
 *Do you agree that mentioning one without the other is POV? 
 *Do you think these errors are encyclopedic? I don't - I think they are both minor. 
 Until you respond to these questions properly you are stuck with demonstrating your bias.  Since I don't think either point should be included, the onus is on you to find an NPOV way of presenting the information.