:::Right, I don't do much with deletions either, but I'm particularly wary of using notability policy as a wedge to keep out unpopular, fringe views.  In an article specifically about Enig, WEIGHT issues should be as much about the subject as the reliability of the sources.  Detailed coverage of her scientific research can either be slightly trimmed, or counterweighted by reference to academic consensus.  We should develop the article as much as we can, and then see where it sits.  As to page protection can we agree: 
 :::*Tags stay up until they are resolved by consensus 
 :::*The subject meets basic notability requirements for at least a section in another article if not this independent article 
 :::*No merge/discussion happens until good sources (above and elsewhere) are incorporated and poor or misused sources are removed 
 :::   
 :::Agree as nom