Sorry for the crappy edit summaries. MediaMatters is not a source for a bio neither are blogs and random websites. This article is about a living person and stricter rules apply to what is and is not acceptable. If mediamatters, some random website or a blog is the only source for something, it does not belong on wikipedia. I understand this article can not have a neutral point of view, not because of the editors or the facts, it is the very nature of a criticism article, they tend to morph into a unorganized list of everything and anything negative that the subject has said or done, well sourced or not. That is what this article has become, I feel it should be deleted but since that is unlikely, I will try to do the next best thing and clean it up. Tell me if you feel I am wrong. I would rather not spend that much time on this. The "spirit of the deletions" was to remove material that is not sourced or sourced poorly, I feel that is improving wikipedia. Stop ignoring WP:BOLP