Unfortunately it seems clear that your edits are not in good faith. You have reverted to the speculation lacking any original research that the first Goetheanum was burnt by arson; you have removed the New York Times headline which indeed indicated this was speculation and called it "Steiner's Temple"; you claim this had to be removed as it constituted "original research" clearly it did not, being a contemporary article. You have removed the reference to the wooden structure being covered with bees wax the research for which I included. You have removed the reference in a letter from Steiner to his wife to his continuing stomach problems and his hemmorhoids. You claim my reference to this is "original research" clearly it is not since it is derived from Steiner's own letter. You have left in the article the entirely unsubstantiated claim that the Goetheanum was burnt by arson. It is clear that you are entirely biased.