:Yes Offy, the article is a piece of rubbish, but you know what, I really don't care what the rabid pov-pushers do anymore, for I didn't sign up for WP to deal with the rabid Res Publica nationalist crowd, and those who are still fighting a long-finished Cold War in their minds. I would be redirecting this particular piece of rubbish to Estonia-Russia relations as it is a mish-mash of WP:POVFORK, WP:OR/WP:SYN and of course WP:NOTADVOCATE and if it is reversed, take it to AfD straight away. Of course, you need to get more interest beyond the usual suspects to get shit like this removed from what is supposed to be an encyclopaedia. On a general level, just remember WP:DIGWUREN and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes; read them and familiarise yourself with them, for when they go back to Arbcom, such things are only go to show their treatment of WP as a battleground, the Soviet War Memorial (Treptower Park) article is the latest prime example of this (and so soon after the falsification of material in Putinjugend which you verified as being false  (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kuban kazak is valid there). So you know what, I say let them write their little pieces of crap all over WP; in fact, we should be encouraging such behaviour. as it will simply be digging their own holes. You may have seen the discussion which took place in which editors were talking about myself cultivating a cult of Putin on Commons, and that creation of articles such as Koni (dog) make them sick. I don't care what they think in this regard, because only a fool can say that uploading of materials to Commons is cultivating a cult, and only a fool would say that creation of content is a bad thing. As  wrote once, people will see the rubbish they write for what it is, and I believe that people will see them for who we already know they really are. So getting back to it, yes, redirect or AfD it. I've got it on my watchlist, so I will catch whatever course of action is taken.