, 13 June 2015 (UTC) | decline = Hmm. Interesting. Your arrogance and contemptuously dismissive attitude to all other editors with whom you have any disagreement is undesirable, but when you go beyond that and start personal attacks it becomes unacceptable, and would justify a limited block. Add to that your edit-warring, combined with statements which make it perfectly clear that you have no intention of doing anything other than trying to force your own preferred version through, with no wish to compromise or to work towards reaching agreement, and we have an editor who is never likely to fit in to the way Wikipedia works, and an indefinite block becomes justified. When we add to that the nonsense you have posted in the form of unblock requests, and it begins to look as though you are either deliberately trolling or else so blind to the nature of what you are doing that you are probably incapable of collaborating with other editors, rather than just unwilling to do so. In either of those two cases unblocking you would clearly not benefit the project at all, so I am declining your so-called "unblock request". Furthermore, your "unblock requests" did not give anything that could possibly be expected to lead to an unblock, but merely give more of your many attempts to show us all how superior you are to the rest of us, and how we all deserve your utter contempt. (When you are blocked for, in part, personal attacks, making an unblock request in which you make further personal attacks is really not likely to succeed. If you realised that then you are trolling, and if you didn't then what does that tell us about your ability to understand how to work in a collaborative project?) Consequently, it is clear that allowing you to post what you call "unblock requests" achieves nothing but a waste of time, your talk page access will be removed, to prevent further similar waste of time. The editor who uses the pseudonym ""  20:01