None of the above. We should describe such guidelines with great care and be careful to avoid making any implication of legitimacy beyond what the guidelines support, which is, in most cases, functionally equivalent to don't replace real treatment, but it probably won't do any harm and it'll keep the patient happy.  ()  
 :*I was careful to do just that, . Can you point out a place where I failed?—  
 ::: I have nothing against your edits, my problem is with trying to cast this section in stone via an rfc that offers only two options. I don't think that's necessary. It's A1candidate's attempt to crowbar his preferred version into the article, and frankly we don't need that. I am not persuaded that the section belongs at all, since it is an open invitation to quote mine.  ()