Right, you think that all of this nonsense it true because it was said in Parliament, well, here's a surprise for you, MPs lie, and tabloid hacks are not particularly well versed in truth either.  You seem to think that I~ should accept being called names by this idiot and have it published without the right to correct inaccuracies. Ok you want to know where you're completely wrong, and I can prove beyond doubt in any court? Let's start with the claim about the allegations of racism, this is nonsense. The original name calling was not by a councilor, it was by a council staff member who had just been arrested and charged with assaulting myself and had decided to distribute lies to get him out of the shit with his employer. I never claimed that "unkempt" was racist, I objected to being called a "pikey cunt" by an MP, which is perfectly acceptable according to you, I assume?  
 As for claiming that I am a "serial complainant", well, look who took up parliamentary time three times, and two parliamentary committee hearings with this, looks like someone else is far more intent on complaining than myself.  
 As for having been "sacked", this goes against the basic principles of democracy and CAN NOT HAPPEN. As for making his life hell, I didn't tell any lies to the police, unlike him, who claimed that I had firearms in my house resulting in police raids and a very violent assault on myself, but hey, the tabloids are only interested in lies. 
 It also appears that the apology to Parliament was mistaken for an apology to Loughton, because the CC flatly refused to apologise to Loughton at both committee hearings, but hey, he told the press that they apologized so it must be true.  
 Either correct this shit or remove it, I am rapidly loosing patience with this now and any further lies distributed about me will be actively and aggressively challenged.