== Second representation of the printable character list == 

 I've added a previously removed second representation of the ASCII characters that supports easy copy-pasting. I wasn't aware that it already has been on the page. My edit got reverted. However, I think it should be still there. 

 In Wikipedia, there are lots of examples where information is displayed multiple times, even when we don't count efforts to help disabled people, like "spoken wikipedia" or descriptions below images: take AES as an example. The text perfectly describes the steps but the images display a second representation of those steps (and a third is in the image description, but as previously described we don't count it). 

 We can see the redundancy also on the principle of the lead paragraph: Except of the X in "is a X", most information gets repeated in the article below. It gives the reader a concise definition of the topic, that can be retrieved without having to read the whole article. The second representation of the ascii list fulfills this second purpose: the reader doesn't have to read every single character to get a full list of ASCII characters. 

 And, redundancy is still present in the list itself: 
 {| style="background:none; text-align:center;" 
 |- style="vertical-align:top;" 
 | 
 {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" 
 |- 
 !Binary !! Oct !! Dec !! Hex !! Glyph 
 |- 
 |010 0000 ||style="background:lightblue;"| 040 || style="background:#cff;"| 32 ||style="background:lightblue;"| 20 ||  
 |} 
 |} 

 The list gives us three representations of the the character's number. 

 I think there are different use cases linked to both representations: first (currently only) representation helps readers with various conversions between the character and its ASCII address. Therefore the multiple number formats. The second (disputed) representation helps the reader in the case they want to act on the whole set of characters: I've used it for password generation, and others might want to use it in a program the case they write in a language that doesn't have such an easy linking between numbers and characters like C. 

 What do you think?