I'll state my rationale more clearly.  First, that journal strikes me as a little shaky.  If we can find out how often it's cited by other academics, then I'm open to persuasion on this point.  However, despite my serious concerns about the quality of the sourcing, even if that were not an issue, the opinion strikes me as so completely bizarre and so disconnected from the text of the show that it's analogous to a fringe opinion.  The article is behind a paywall, so I can't read it just by clicking the link; it would be helpful to see what text from the show the author cites to support his position.  If it's just a "sense" he gets from watching the show, then the fact that he got some random journal to publish it doesn't mean we need to highlight his opinion.  Would a single journal article be an adequate source for an editor to put ANYTHING in ANY article on Wikipedia?