" 

  
 Notice:  many comments above are all crap and his allegations were rejected by another user/administrator and the case was speedy closed. See Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Copyrighted images and copyright notice not allowed on the English Wikipedia?: 

 Will somebody please have a look at this. I added a picture to an article, but it was removed by the user  with the reason, that ""No copyrighted images allowed, no images with requirement for copyright notice"" Is this true? I think  has misunderstood something. Many images on Wikipedia are not in the public domain, but are copyrighted and can be used under a license. If one think that copyright means ""do never use this image"" then one have misunderstood the situation. Does the English Wikipedia have a policy saying something like ""No copyrighted images allowed, no images with requirement for copyright notice""???    

 :We do allow copyright images, but the case here is that being a picture of a real-world object that is not a piece of artist work, we can reasonably expect a free replacement can be taken particularly since its used around the world, per WP:NFCC#1.    

 :I suspect he misused ""copyrighted"" to mean ""non-free"". Free licensed image are acceptable equally with PD. (Some of the helpers on this forum make the same mistake.) —    
 ::Oh, I see the root of the misunderstanding: You added a photo with a copyright notice in the caption. We put copyright notices on file description pages not in captions. (See WP:CREDITS.) The other user removed the whole image, not just the copyright notice. —    

 :::The guideline at WP:CREDITS says that no copyright notice should be placed in the article. The larger issue with the image in question is that it is part of a promotional campaign by JAL78 to replace Bösendorfer, Bechstein and other competitor piano images with an image of a Steinway & Sons piano. () I reverted all of the images thus placed because of conflict of interest issues.    

 ::::– Yes, the credit does not necessarily need to be on the article page itself – that cannot be required by the copyright holder; having it on the image page is enough by most Wikipedia projects' standards.  said that copyrighted images are not allowed on Wikipedia, which is false.  deleted the image – not only the optional byline – and he wrote that ""No copyrighted images allowed, no images with requirement for copyright notice"". 
 ::::–  accuse of my