Anyhoo, obviously a neutral, objective third party opinion is needed. Maybe this will calm the slander-mill and conspiracy theories down a bit and demonstrate that my expansions are acceptable according to arbitration clarification: 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests&oldid;=229015145#Request_for_clarification_:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FJohn_Buscema 

 "The terms of the arbitration case are that you have to respect the basic structure, so simply restoring the same paragraphs that were previously being objected to would not be respecting the structure but reverting to the previous structure. The external link to Nationmaster is clearly inappropriate. If you are adding reliable source references to what it already in the article, or making additions to explain existing material, then that is quite acceptable. Meanwhile I hope other editors will continue to assume good faith on your contributions. Sam Blacketer (talk) "