46, 19 December 2014 (UTC). 

 :I'm afraid I agree that jacobbarnett.com is a promotional site for the mother's book. The home page, mostly a slideshow, has only a bit of text that gets right to advertising for the book: "...The story of this is detailed in the book The Spark, published by Random House. The book is an international bestseller..." The tabs on that top page go to either a book-specific advert page, a book tour page ("The Spark Tour"), or a webform to join their mailing list. A secondary purpose for that last tab appears to be a vehicle to hire his mother as a speaker: "You can book Kristine to speak at the above link, or schedule a consultation!". What I don't see is the kind of fodder that comprises the typical private homepage of a scientist, e.g. CV, list of publications, career recitation and/or interests, lab members, course listings, etc. In other words, despite the URL, the content does not fit the description as being the personal/private website of this individual. PS: There is still the unresolved matter of the undue focus on the PRA paper (having its own subsection) – this is not conventional for science bios. I would like to propose deleting this subsection and just having the paper cited under "works" or some such, as is conventional. Thoughts?   16: