== Psychology of Orgasm, People!!!!!! == 

 I keep coming back to this site to see if anyone's added anything about the psychology of orgasm.  How is it possible that this issue/aspect could be left out?  Is every single contributor to Wikipedia a biology major?  Every single contributer to the orgasm page at least?  Orgasm is arguably as much psychologically constituted as it is physiological or anything else.  I've heard that it is impossible to achieve orgasm by physical stimulation alone, just as it's impossible with fantasy alone.  And this makes sense to me, you need both.  Masturbating for istance: sooner or later one's thoughts drift into a realm of make-believe with a deeply psycho-sexual essence.  Indulge me here:  Try having an orgasm without any sense perception at all, somehow suspended in a stark empty room with absolutely NO physical stimulation, nothing to see, hear, touch/feel, smell, taste.  All you have is your mind.  Try acheiving orgasm in this state without touching yourself or moving your body in any way to create even self-induced friction.  I would say it's impossible to acheive an orgasm thus  that is to say, by thoughts/fantasy alone.  Now, conversely, imagine that all you have is physical stimulation, and no fantasy.  Maybe that part of your brain that allows you to think of things you find sexually appealing has somehow been shut off.  Will you have an orgasm 'as long as you keep rubbing your genitals'?  I doubt it.  Sooner or later the psychology and the physiology blend, and this is the fascinating part, to me, and essential to be added here.  Regardless of what your personal paraphilia is  and I hate the 'abnormal' connotation of the word paraphilia (what is "normal" any way; especially when it comes to sex?)  if you're devoid of the ability to 'play' in your head, you're hopeless to achieve orgasm.  Again, conversely, if all you have is your mind to 'think sexy thoughts', you're getting nowhere until you start 'getting physical', by yourself or with someone else.  I read the first introductory paragraph to this article and I want to puke.  Then it of course goes into the standard 'this is the male orgasm' and 'this is the female orgasm' and let's look at the genetics of orgasm and talk about the possibility of someone having multiple orgasms, and this artcicle is terrible.  

 :If you could point out some good sources on the psychology of orgasm, then I'm sure that we can incorporate them into the article. 

 :Of course, you could always be bold and add them to the article yourself!