::The splitting out of the "Criticism Section" and making a separate "Criticism Article" is a direct violation of the neutral point of view policy. Specifically, refer to Breaking out trivial or controversial sections. Also see WP:CFORK, from which I quote "A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. All POV forks are undesirable on Wikipedia, as they avoid consensus building and therefore violate one of our most important policies."  Furthermore, the Religion article does not even mention the criticism anywhere.  The ideal would be to completely incorporate the criticism directly into the text (i.e. merging the criticism article with the religion article).  Since that has not been done, we must at least have a criticism section in the religion article.  Right now, the criticisms have been deliberately removed from the article creating a POV fork!   

 ::Also note Wikipedia's policy on Tag-team editing: Tag teams work in unison to push a particular point of view. Tag-team editing – to thwart core policies (neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research); or to evade procedural restrictions such as the three revert rule or to violate behavioural norms by edit warring; or to attempt to exert ownership over articles; or otherwise to prevent consensus prevailing – is prohibited.  

 :: In conclusion, the Religion article requires a criticism section to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines.  The following banner must be placed on the Religion page as well.