" 

 ==Page move== 
 It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved: 
 ====Economy of Taiwan → Economy of the Republic of China==== 
 and Holidays in Taiwan → Holidays in the Republic of China, Demographics of Taiwan → Demographics of the Republic of China, New Party (Taiwan) → New Party (Republic of China), Communications in Taiwan → Communications in the Republic of China, Highway System in Taiwan → Highway system in the Republic of China, Transportation in Taiwan → Transportation in the Republic of China, (:Category:Airports of Taiwan → Category:Airports of the Republic of China) 

 This request is to make the titles of these articles to conform with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Political NPOV: "" the word ""Taiwan"" should not be used if the term ""Republic of China"" is more accurate. "". 

 Note: If you do not agree with the said conventions, bring the issue to its discussion page. Please do not oppose this request because you disagree with the conventions.  —  20:08 Feb 27 2005 (UTC) 
 *By nominating I support renaming.  —  20:08 Feb 27 2005 (UTC) 

 * Oppose for the same reasons I've opposed all your other taiwan → ROC proposals.  No one understands the ROC or its nuances, Taiwan is the prevalent Western usage.  I (as several others here are) am growing tired of your forcing this issue down everyone's throats.  Wikipedia is not a place for your personal or political agenda. —  
 **In other words you disagree with the naming conventions. Please go to its discussion page. —  01:12 Feb 28 2005 (UTC) 
 ***Sorry, you're not the boss of me, I'll oppose what I want, when and where I want to...and I'll tell you where you can put that discussion page. Besides, we've already talked about recent, suspect changes to the naming convention you so like to tout that just coincidentally happen to suit your personal and political agenda. —  
 ****It has nothing to do with any political agenda, and I have no contribution to the naming conventions. —  07:16 Feb 26 2005 (UTC) 
 ****No, but the pertinent naming conventions are the boss of you and everyone else.  Here and now is neither the time nor the place to discuss your individual objections to the naming conventions.  Those conventions are the result of a community consensus.  All we're doing here is determining in what form they apply to the proposed move: if they apply, and I think they do, we have no choice but to rename the articles according to those conventions.   
 * Oppose as per ExplorerCDT, please see the reasons I've opposed all your other Taiwan → ROC proposals. Please stop this disruptive behaviour. Whilst I personally will not list you on WP:RfC, I would now be willing to certify any listing added by another - you have the right to ask your question once, maybe twice, but having gotten the answer you should not persist,   
 ** I'm in the same boat, but he's actually threatened to RfC me on other people's talk pages (yes, Instantnood, I see everything) for having the temerity to oppose his disruptive b.s. Am I wrong in likening him to one of those annoying little gnats that pester on a humid summer day? —  
 ***I did not.  mentioned about you at my discussion page, and I told her/him about an old RfC of you. —  01:13 Feb 28 2005 (UTC) 
 ****Then what is all these trash on my ?  
 *****I have never threatened to RFC anybody.   —  11:01 Feb 28 2005 (UTC) 
 **Relax, and please stop the accusations. Discussing a proposed move is hardly disruptive behavior.   
 *Oppose As ExplorerCDT and jguk have both been told, there is no need to dumb things down for encyclopedias just because the masses of people are dumb and the media has to cater to these dumb masses. Our job i