" 
 ==Reply== 
 Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because  
 *it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. I accept that you have attempted to reference, but there are some claims that need referencing or removing. 
 *it's all about what the company organisation does, little about the company itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.  
 *it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Africa’s leading online travel company.... luxury travel... raises over one million rand for the chosen charities... who work tirelessly... determined to bring world-class digital learning... they have 8,500 registered learners. 
 *If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. That's particularly the case if you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at . The template  can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:  {{paid|user=|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.  

 It's not the worse I've seen, and if you want to try again, I'll post the deleted text to a user sandbox for you to work on, just answer the COI query above and let me know if you would like the deleted text  -  "