== Defamation == 
 Just to clarify a point please.  The changing of the image I considered a copyright violation, not defamation.  I had to; it goes with my work, protecting the property of the Regimental Archives.  However the altered image was removed, so end of story on that point.  My feelings as to defamation arise from the comment placed in the page history edit summary by Mr Kenney ie:-  
 (cur) (last)  John Kenney (Wow, that Richard Harvey sure is a prick, huh?). Though please don't worry I am not going to instruct a lawyer to sue anyone, or even send in the FBI, or an A Team, to take action, as one see's in the Films.   The somewhat vociferous comment:-   
 I said on the description page that if you didn't like it, I would delete it, you asshole.  You are a completely absurd person, fuck you.   7 July 2005 15:05 (UTC), though offensive and undeserved I put down to Mr Kenney possibly having a bad day, perhaps he had a flat tyre on the freeway, or he got his income tax demand, I don't know.  If I had jailed every soldier I heard swearing the British Army would be at half strength, not that it isn't far off that now. 

 If Mr Kenney had dropped a note on my talk page asking why the Image had a caption embedded I could have given him the same information I e-mailed to Sam Spade, and therefore, hopefully, avoided this unfortunate series of events.  Mr Kenney I bear you no ill will, If I met you in a pub I would happily shake your hand and buy you a pint.  Perhaps I have missed a point somewhere in that I assumed an Encyclopaedia / Wikipedia to be a platform for providing factual information to the whole wide world.  In the archives having a caption on an image avoids many identification errors.  Could not a note on the article page have been placed to say that - the picture showed the 'Title used' by the 8th Duke, though it was believed to be 'xyz'. 

 Our small archives team have taken on a collection of 300+ years worth of boxes, trunks, cupboards and envelopes. The contents of which have never seen the light of day.  We are  overwhelmed by photo's, sketches, drawings, paintings, documents, maps and artefacts, with more turning up as former Regimental members and Officers pass away. Usually donated in their wills, but often brought in by their descendants.  They find things as they clear out their homes, bring them in for information on them, and often leave them with us. Many of these are passed on to our Museum. But only so much can be shown. I hoped to make these items available for viewing through Wikipedia, on articles already there, to help enhance them.  I am however restricted by a board of trustees, who do not wish to see items entrusted to them abused, hence the embedded captions, describing the image. 

 It took me a long time to get permission to upload images.  It would be a shame to now have that permission withdrawn.  I shall have to speak with the 'Colonels'.  Though if the Wikipedian gods feel this is not acceptable then it would perhaps be wiser to delete everything I have contributed to the project. You must decide this amongst yourselves. Should this be preferred, then have Sam Spade drop me an e-mail. I will draw up a list of what I have uploaded, from the archives, and e-mail it to Sam Spade for them to be taken off your database.  Please note though that I have also uploaded a number of images I have created or photographed myself, without titles embedded.  I am happy for those to remain as PD items. I note there is a request in for a photo of an Electricity Pylon, built over a canal, around 20 miles from my home, well; the brother of one of our staff has the UK contract to maintain the Pylons? Perhaps I can get access.   Sam Spade, I don't know who you are and I'm sorry if I've dropped you in for a load of work, but thank you.   

 :I am glad to be of service, in whatever way I am able. Officially i am a Wikipedia:Members advocate, and it appears I am acting in that capacity in this matter. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸