" 

  
 ==Rostislaw Wygranienko==  
 Hello! I've just add some citations and sources, and change the text, so, please, change the templates. Thanks!    
 ::I've placed them  where they go, & fixed up the English a little. The next step is finding some third party reference to the competition he has won. wiki.bin by itself is not sufficient for that.   '   
 :::Thanks! I added some new sources and references, not all, but now is better than before   

 == Rostislaw Wygranienko == 

 I noticed you helping with some cleanup on the article. I had tagged it for G12 because it was from ""Wikibin"" which is new to me but, as you said, they use the GFDL so that handles any problem there. I think what's happening though is that they take deleted articles and post them there. The old deletion debate on this one is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostislaw Wygranienko. Is that you're understanding of that site? 

 My other question is if you know of any WP:Plagiarism templates that could be used much like the {{copy paste}} templates. Even if the source is public domain, or appropriately licensed, a lot of these copy paste articles (like this one) need to indicate some sourcing. I spent a while yesterday trying to sort through an editor's contributions of public domain material, and got what looks like all of it sourced, but I've seen this problem more and more. I wondered how you tend to handle these, especially when there are too many to just quickly take care of yourself. Thanks.    

 ::wikibin takes material from here, but they take material from elsewhere also. That they have deleted articles is sometimes helpful, but otherwise they're  a prime example of what Wikipedia might be like if we had no rules about promotionalism., NPOV or Verifiability.   
 ::you are right that in any case it seems to be based on the deleted article, which I have examined. this can fall under speedy criterion G6, repost after AfD  without dealing with the problems but the discussion there was so inadequate that, by current standards, I think it would need a new discussion. If anyone wants to renominate, they can do so. there is somewhat questionable notability , and I tagged for that. The question will be whether the awards are significant. I checked the articles in ru, po and uk, and see some more detail, but no additional sources.  
 :::As for plagiarism, copying a list of positions or recordings is probably not even copyvio, because there is no US copyright on facts, just on the expression of them, and there is sometimes no other possible way to express the facts. However, it is highly desirable to  rewrite even such lists a little , at least in format, so as not to be an exact copy. Certainly it's not plagiarism, if it's attributed to the source, and we   do that.    There are two types of plagiarism that are not acceptable at all here: one is not attributing, and the other is following a source too closely. How exactly a copy needs to be attributed is an open question.  Normally,it is considered plagiarism in the academic world to not indicate exactly with quotation marks just what part is copied, but that rule has not  been strictly followed here, though I think  it ought to be. I am particularly concerned about the material copied from the old EB and Catholic encyclopedia, with a general notice that its been followed, bt not indication of whether it's the whole articlethe reason I am particularly concerned here is that such material is   always outdated, is often now known to be inaccurate in major ways  and is often POV by our current standards; I consider the main use of it is to show what people  thought 100 years ago.    
 :::There are some useful related templates     ""this article is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies."";   ""This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate "" (note that contrary to what some people say, there is no rule that inline citations are actually always required, though they are for Featured Article status), and the very helpful   We probably do need a specific template. Anyone can make one. I'll give it a try if I get a chance from emergency rescues.   ' ([[User talk:DG