Maafa 21 is not an anti-abortion film. Abortion is only part of the story that it tells. To define it as an anti-abortion film already shows that the article has a "pro-choice" (pro-abortion) bias. All the attempts to discredit the film revolve around minor and inessential points such as the idea that Margaret Sanger was not a racist. She was not a racist in the sense that she did not say the white race is superior to the negro race. But she did believe in breeding "a race of thoroughbreds" She believed in the segregation of the unfit. She believed in the War Against the Weak (phrase of Edwin Black). There is not only a vague relation with Nazi ideology but a well-documented case that Hitler's eugenic ideas were rooted in Anglo-American Eugenic practice. To get to what she and her movement actually believed about black people one needs to ask what these people felt about black culture. The answer is that they despised it as inferior. They despised the African culture of life. They despised the very core of African American culture, and if you are to maintain that this does not constitute racism, you are talking about a distinction without a difference. Okay Sanger was not a "racist" but she was all of what I have said. Her movement deceitfully injected the culture of death into Black America. This is not to call her deceitful, but her ideas were arrogant, and the historical unfolding of those ideas was deceitful. The article refuses to acknwoledge the documentation of the film which is impressive. To say it is misleading needs to be established. I have not seen any substantial criticisms of what the film pretends. It concerns Black Genocide, not a conspiracy theory. More than 16 million black unborn have been aborted since Roe v. Wade. This genocide hides in the open. Oh yes all those mothers chose to abort, except perhaps some who were forced to, or who were deceived about abortion). But there are historical forces that chose for abortion. It is incorrect history to say that our abortion practice arose from the will of the people, the will of women. Sanger was a woman, but she did not represent the will of the people. Her movement is called the Eugenics movement, Eugenics was the principle motivation of what was to be called Planned Parenthood. Her movement was motivated by elitist arrogance. (This does not mean that family planning is the same as elitist arrogance, and it does not mean that reproductive freedom, the misused term, is a useless expression)  The film tells that story in a devastating and convincing fashion. Please let my comment stand this time, Bink. These are fundamental issues.