"=0&map;=map&currentTab;=tabs-1&pagedate;=11%2F14%2F2013&editioncode;=34&pageno;=1&view;=image  
 Link:: http://epaper.bhaskar.com/detail/?id=435120&boxid;=111415519218&ch;=0&map;=map&currentTab;=tabs-1&pagedate;=11%2F14%2F2013&editioncode;=34&pageno;=1&view;=image Regards    

  

 ==Yahoo Chess== 
 Looks like some admin came by and summarily deleted the Chess on Yahoo! article on which we were working.  Can we contest this?    

 Now we have this: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Chess_on_Yahoo!_Games    

 == Edits on Gary Kasparov Article  == 

 I just wanted to apologize for coming off as an ass hole through my recent edits on the  Gary Kasparov article. I also apologized to  for unintentionally re-reverting his edits back to mine. Could you explain to me what I did specifically to upset you so I don't make the same mistake in the future? I found some additional sources for this article and I was simply trying to reorganize it to make it easier to read.  

 Best, 

    

 :I wasn't upset. There was no reason to suppose your revert (edit-war instead of WP:BRD) was done by accident, so your edit sum in that context seemed snarky. (Am curious to understand how TW works re edit sums [I don't use that s/w myself]: how is the edit sum generated, by drop box selection? a programmed default? And does it display each edit for approval such as clicking 'send' or something? Thx for explain.) At any rate, article leads are suscribed to be up to four paras for mature articles, so I don't understand the compulsion to reduce the Kasparov lead to one sentence. Also, a section title  ""Background"" is implicit re lead material, so relocating material to section of that name is redundant and therefore disimprovement. Ok,    

 == Boris Katalimov == 

 Hi I see you are interested in chess - could you please take a look at this Boris Katalimov ? 
 Thank you   
 :Yes. I made minor punct. changes, but I don't know how to improve the article further; I lack the research materials. Ok,    

 == WTF? == 

 Why did you revert my edit to WP:DIVA? There is no link to any editor for that quote. Please self-revert.    
 :I'm not even going to wait for a response. You know what to do with your revert. Get used to this attitude.    
 ::Your attempt to goad (""bait"") me into an edit war will not work. There is no link to any editor with that quote. You are now therefore edit warring in bad faith. And I truly don't give a fuck what your opinion of my edit is. It wasn't meant for you to revert.    
 :::You're full of it. And how stupid do you think I am? I haven't posted there [Eric Corbett's User talk] since my last post, and I don't plan on it. It seems pretty clear I'd be blocked for ""harassment"" if I were to ever post there again. Doc talk It seems that you have found another venue (DIVA editorial page) to do your harassment on. Please stay off my Talk. (I don't like dishonest, nasty people here. I agree with Drmies. You are a ""disruptor"".)    

 == Chess Date == 

 Thank you for offering your expertise in my edit, much better!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by   • [[Special:Contributions/HACKER HE