===Spinoff 2012-06=== 
 Relative to the entire article, the length of the notable Cherokee 'Native American' self-identification section argues persuasively for a spinoff article titled 'Elizabeth Warren self-identification controversy'. 
 * WP:UNDUE#Point of view forks states: "All facts and significant points of view on a given subject should be treated in one article except in the case of an article spinout. Some topics are so large that one article cannot reasonably cover all facets of the topic. ...This type of split is permissible only if written from a neutral point of view and must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article." 
 * The WP:CONTENTFORKING guideline states: "A content fork is the creation of multiple separate articles all treating the same subject. Content forks that are created unintentionally...are to be avoided. On the other hand, as an article grows, editors often create...new, linked articles for related material. This is acceptable, and often encouraged, as a way of making articles clearer and easier to manage." 
 * The WP:CONTENTFORKING section discussing WP:SPINOFF states: "Sometimes, when an article gets long, a section of the article is made into its own article, and the handling of the subject in the main article is condensed to a brief summary. This is completely normal Wikipedia procedure. ...Even if the subject of the new article is controversial, this does not automatically make the new article a POV fork. ...Essentially, it is generally acceptable to have different levels of detail of a subject on different pages, provided that each provides a balanced view of the subject matter. This can happen when a particular controversial incident gets a lot of attention from editors representing different points of view, expanding until every item of evidence is included and referenced. This kind of detailed examination of a single incident in a general article will usually be considered to give Undue Weight to the incident so it is more appropriate to break that section out as a separate section and just have a summary in the main article. ...Spinouts are intended to improve readability and navigation" 
 I've suggested the article title 'Elizabeth Warren self-identification controversy' because 1) the controversy is less about the particular ethnicity/nationality and more about the self-identification itself; and 2) Warren explicitly self-identifies as both Cherokee and Delaware. Any serious objections to creating a 'content fork' for Warren's self-identification controversy?