, 14 November 2015 (UTC) 
 ::When the rest of the article deals with moral panics as discussed in academic literature, not just popular media  and especially when the latter comes in the form of e.g. opinion columns, which unlike academic material is not the sort of place that undergoes scrutiny upon employing a particular term  it's WP:UNDUE to include lest the article become a WP:COATRACK for what anybody has ever called "moral panic". Standards for reliable sources are contextual. There's no publication/author/publisher that's considered reliable for use in all contexts. Here, there's been a sense that, since high quality scholarly sources exist about this subject, and thus it's treated as a subject well defined by the highest quality sources, there's no reason to use lower quality sources just for the sake of expansion. —   \\ 16:28