" 

 :This email might tell you more. See also Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Proposed changes to policy, where Eloquence says ""disambiguation pages should only link to pages where there is a substantial risk of confusion with the actual page title."" I think this was his objection to this page, as no one is going to link to Bag when they actually wanted to link to a page about airbags or bag knots for example.   

 ::I guess that makes some sense.  I'm not sure whether I agree with it or not, but I'll go ahead and change the page back. - |  

 == Separate page for baggage == 

 I think baggage should have it's own page. If nobody objects I'm going to move Checked baggage and Excess baggage to Baggage, add some stuff about carry-on baggage and add redirects from luggage and hand luggage. 

 
 :Go for it, that will give even more reason to get rid of this ridiculous entry.  

 A separate page for baggage is a good idea, but this page absolutely should not be deleted.  There is nothing wrong with extra content.  In fact, if you want it deleted, why are you even reading it?  Just pretend it doesn't exist and go on to other articles.    

  
 Our condo, in New Hope PA, is located on the Deleware River and was once a Union Papger Bag Company plant.  The river has a ""wing dam"" adjacent to the building that was used t direct water into the plant for processing. I am trying to locate information about the company and the plant.  Anyone have any suggestions on where to look?  Lou Molettiere  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 == Why does this article even exist? == 

 It seems to me to be yet another case of people trying to turn Wikipedia into a dictionary, or people just being amazed at the ability to self-publish. Or hypertext newbies thinking it's cool to link every noun in every article. I mean, what is the point of defining ""bag""? ""Sometimes a travel bag has a lock."" *rolls eyes* How interesting. I didn't know that. Sorry, I feel a bit snobbish today. Still, I'd like to hear a defense of why this article should exist. -   
 :I concur completely, though of course, if it's deleted it won't stay that way for long.  

 You really dont need to know about bags. Are there people fascinated with bags out there? Thats just strange and stupid  

 ""Bag"" has meanings in contexts other than the obvious, Bag (mathematics) for example.  Thus there needs to be some trivial explanation as to the common meaning of the word.  There's no need for you to talk down to Wikipedians in this way.  If you feel the need to apologise for your comments, you probably shouldn't post them, Mjb.     

 ==Deleted from the article== 
 ""A common misconception is that a 'bag' with an over the chest strap is actually a bag, this conflicts with commonly acceptable definitions of 'bags'. The trend for such 'bags' has become popular in the early part of the 21st Century and displays another prominent example of the erosion of our civilised culture."" Actually this nonsense should be deleted right away, but just in case somebody cares about this, I'll leave it here. And BTW, the ""baggae"" sections should really go to an article of their own.   

 == Early history of bags == 

 I'd like to read when bags were invented. After all, only with bags hunter-gatherers could gather enough for many thus allowing specialization, and eventualy culture. 

 Who the Heck cares about the History of the Bag?!?!?!?!?!?! You people are really werid!  

 :A history of bags would be interesting, it would certainly add more content to the page. One could find out when and where the bags were first commonly used, what they were made of and how they've evolved over time, including how they relate to today's world (pollution?). 

 == New Jersey insult? == 

 Is there documenta