:Its not that I don't think AC cannot do cases where the issue is of consensus being breached or not, its that consensus is used a lot in policies here, but WP:Consensus is not that clear on whether we should tally votes, count "points not addressed/reasons given", or "use knowledge from other AfDs, polls, discussion to factor in the consensus as a whole". I can't just pick one as an arbitrator, thats for policy discussion to decide (heh, ironically, we need a consensus on what consensus is, a feedback loop). This is one of those policies that should have been layout out better from the beginning, like NPOV. To be honest, a huge poll at WT:Consensus may be the best way (polls may "be evil", but we need some way to avoid the feedback loop this one time). I'll try and start the dialogue sometime if I have to.''''''