==Failed "good article" nomination== 
 This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 4, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria: 

 :1. Well written?:  Article contalined many red links and should be in a written format instead of trivial lists. 
 :2. Factually accurate?:  Artilce only cites one source, the rest of the article needs references. 
 :3. Broad in coverage?:  Article discusses many key points in its coverage. 
 :4. Neutral point of view?:  No WP:NPOV problems. 
 :5. Article stability?  Article has been stable. 
 :6. Images?:  Article contains images. 

 When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.  Thank you for your work so far.  
 — ''''''  ·