I think that one of the problems with the concern about so-called peacock terms and weasel words is that too many overzealous editors fail to notice that the article is about the product, and the comments regarding the product are obviously to be taken within that context.  It would be stupid to ignore sound facts because someone thought it was too grandiose or self-serving or not based in reality.  When I read an article, I demand to know all about the subject, not just one slanted viewpoint.  I believe that most of the statements are just fine. -