::The copyvio was use of a full 30 line table from a copyrighted site  I added an RfC on it now. He used Alexa as a source for a claim about Drudge losing share from 2003  by 2/3 (he quotes percent of Internet traffic as though it is a valid figure at all from 2003) and admits it is not available material from the cite he used - so he readded it without a proper source.  He removed one month averages (replacing for DR with a single day figure of all things)  on several sites in order to focus on the copyrighted table even where he ASKED for the data to be in the article ,  and he has even said  that saying Drudge "inflates" his users is NPOV .  I have carefully not deleted any of his RS cites  whilst he reverted every single item I added in the past month  only to assert that I added nothing .  If this is not 3RR is is absolutely OWN. I asked here as I value your judgement highly on this for sure.