This article is a big fraud by people like Paul B and Dab, these same people (westerners and christians) were once (and most still are) fervent supporters of violent AIT (basically whites coming down and subjugating and 'uplifting' blacks). Now with a barrage of evidence against AIT, it has been craftly morphed into AMT. This article has been modified by such people to present a picture that AIT was never a serious theory (phrases like 'polemic construct'..), however, in reality, AIT was and still is officially accepted & supported all over west & sometimes in India as well (due to leftist dominance in this field). I am not providing any links to supports this, as it is very obvious.. see Indian-history pages on websites of all major western organisations viz.CIA, US Dept. of state, discovery's history channel and so on.. In all of these cases, Aryan invasion, Dravidan subjugation and IVC distruction is mentioned as history. Basically, the trend is, if they can get away with mentioning AIT as fact, they will do so. If pressed with had evidence (or on sites like wikipedia where there is room for protest), AMT will be mentioned as an alternative, or AIT will be toned down to 'Invasion when IVC was already declining' or 'Invasion + other reasons caused the fall of IVC'.