== An unanticipated compliment == 

 I didn't so much agree with what you said as with the way you said it at [User talk:NIMSoffice#Scientific jargon ]]  not that I'm wanting to disagree.  No.  I'm just wanting to emphasize style over substance in this unique instance. 

 I'm really quite pleased with your approach to constructive criticism.  I like it that you try to explain a problem and then you also refer to an article which can be used as a comparative standard.  The tone of language is just right, finely balanced.  I intend to come back to this posting again in the future; and I definitely plan to plagiarize the following sentences: 
 :"The original research and and unreferenced tags go hand-in-hand. There are some external links but no indication of where each particular fact in the is coming from." 
 On several occasions, I've tried to explain the same thing, but never with so few words.  In such circumstances  regrettably, my unsuccessful prose has inspired only cursory dismissal, rejection or perhaps WP:TL;DR.   

 Your modest words suggest a better way for me to get my point across. Thanks.