:::::First of all, as I pointed out, the article already mentions that the company has sponsorhip dealls with various organizations, and the WTA is named specifically. The onus is on you to justify why you think this section needs to be expanded beyond what's listed now  it is given approrpaite weight in the current version. You have shown no independent sources that have discussed the sponsorships (other than the WTA) and yet you are proposing to give this section more weight than it merits . I asked you to specifcally summarize the details about sponsorship on each of these sites that you linked too because I checked a few of them and they had no details at all; some of the links did not even lead to evidence that any form of sponsorsip exists. I had a look at the USANA link about sponsorships and it is chock full of fluffy promotional testimonials about USANA products  that's blatantly promotional/advertorial and it is inappropriate for a WP to serve an advocacy role for promotional material.