== Tendentious editing/ I can't believe it! == 

 In his revert of 16:05, 16 December 2013‎, Mann Jess states It's not what our sources say, referring to the preceding edit which he reverted, the exact text of which was: The concept is not consistent with the law of mass action.  This is an astonishing statement for a supposedly experienced editor to make, given that the article by Ball cited in the article concerned states (and I quote) they [the claims] defied conventional scientific understanding, specifically the law of mass action.