::The "official" policy on notability is such that Wikipedia should not have an article unless multiple independent, reliable sources have already covered the issue in sufficient depth.  Coupled with the requirement for secondary sources, my interpretation is that Wikipedia articles should only reflect those which have already been the subject of (preferably academic) in-depth study.  (My interpretation is, I admit, a little stricter than average.)  In any case, there is an inherent problem with articles such as this, where no real academic study exists, and the page is merely a synthesis of individual news articles.  This problem becomes evident in in difficulty avoiding original research, and particularly in definitional problems.  We've seen the problem in several other articles.