:We differ on opinions of "reasonable", where the serious informational resources of Wikipedia and Commons are concerned, but in all this we have gotten away from Sanger's main focus on Simple Wikipedia, which is perhaps more problematic.  I don't pay attention to it because I never got the point of it, but it does have an identity crisis.  The emphasis on children on its main page is indeed potentially misleading, when the "Multimedia" search puts you straight through to Wikimedia Commons, and when, more importantly, like any WMF project, it's free for anyone to edit.  That's no safe haven for kids in any case.  It's my understanding that a true "safe for children" site requires intensive community monitoring, not just a few admins you can call if there's trouble, but literally somebody watching every post in every chatroom and somebody watching them also.