:::: Sorry you are getting burnt. I don't understand what it is driving you.  in any case, I have told you exactly what is wrong with the content and with the proposed section altogether.   I will say it again - a section broadly talking about "results of poor sleep hygiene" is based on an assumption of causality that the literature doesn't support, as far as I can see.  I have looked.    Instead of listening and adapting, you just keep going after the same thing - this assumption you have that there is causality.  And you still have not found a source that could support such a section.  I reckon that would be exhausting.  More importantly to our collaboration, you didn't acknowledge that you have proposed content that was not only not-supported by the source, but directly contradicted by it. (This is what often happens when editors bring an assumption to the table and try to shove it in, instead of reading the best sources they can find and listening to them)  This is all about content and sources, not about ego.  I fuck up all the time, and I acknowledge it and apologize.  Anyway, good luck.