, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 

 :I like it. You find that the IP is not an open proxy, so another administrator "shortens" the block to 1 week and makes it for disruptive editing instead with a very vague reason. (Plus if the edits I did were disruptive, better ban fucking everyone at ANI.) But sure, I get it, the cabal wins again. You can block this IP too for "evading" a block of "disruptive" editing that was applied without prior warnings, without any reasons, without any response or update at this talk page to the evidence etc... Good job guys. You wonder why you have so many IPs that end up vandalising or causing trouble, and it's because certain administrators treat them like shit. I used to be a common editor who rarely fixed up stuff in articles, till one day a drama-queen editor randomly dragged me to ANI and days were wasted there before someone said "You know the IP hasn't done anything wrong." I've posted on project pages only to be randomly reverted as "obvious sock". You guys seem to think any IP who knows anything about Wikipedia is obviously a troll, and you know what that attitude does? It MAKES them into trolls. Anyway, rant done. I like how no one has even pointed out to the blocking admin that all his "proxy" blocks based off this tool have been reverted now to stop him making further errors. But then again, whats the worst that could happen, he blocks an IP? is cool they are scumbags anyway, not part of the glorious administrator master race. BYE.   11:08