:: 2. Again, like , I think it's quite possible that it isn't- I haven't looked at it yet. I did delete one link to the optimus prime article just last night on the basis that it was not an acceptable opinion piece in that context, and may get around to deleting the other. It might get deleted by any of us and, if there are objections, we'll discuss it here. 
 :::The sentence,  Writing in the Herald Sun, journalist Miranda Devine has said that Jim Wallace, "has copped more than his fair share of abuse when it comes to defending traditional marriage" was removed at least four times, with little or no explanation on:  
 :::* 01:16,  8  December 2012 
 :::* 11:41, 10 November 2012 
 :::* 22:20,  6  November 2012 
 :::* 14:06,  4  November 2012 
 :::Up until 10 Nov it was reverted with TP and edit summaries.   
 :::The, Jim Wallace is Optimus Prime Geoff Lemon opinion piece has never been touched.    
 :: Without doubt, there will be sections of this article that haven't reached consensus for another month or so- you have just listed a couple (in, I must say, lanuage that seems quite aggressive). This is the way it has to be, if we are to work cooperatively on improving the article, one issue at a time, as has been requested above by various editors including yourself. It will not magically become acceptable without some discussion, which takes time.