: This is a general issue related to conditions, not OR in relation to Lisbeth Salander. The important part is the sentence before the piece you deleted. 
 :: "Throughout the series, Blomkvist speculates that Salander might have Asperger's syndrome. Larsson himself stated that he thought that she might be looked upon as an unusual kind of sociopath, due to her traumatic life experiences and inability to conform to social norms." 
 : The first of these is unreferenced, and would rely on some primary sourcing from the book itself. The second, and Larsson's comparison to Pippi Longstocking, is adequately sourced from the NYT. 
 : I consider the text, as it now stands, to be problematic. Blomkvist might consider that Salander has Asperger's, yet her behaviour is far from Asperger-like. The point of the general psychiatric text that you deleted was to clarify this. The fictional Blomkvist might indeed hold this view, however it is not supported by current thought in the discipline - i.e. he is wrong. The article, as of now, gives a quite false impression that Salander either has Asperger's, or at least displays typical behaviour for it. She clearly does not - her described behaviour is not Asperger-like. 
 : If you want to fix a problem with the article, then I think that first of all Blomkvist's speculation needs to be sourced. The piece you deleted should be restored, possibly with more explanation as to why these sources are there to contradict Blomkvist's naive diagnosis. Their application to Salander's personal case is self-evident (this could be expanded by citing instances from the novel, if you wish). If you have a wiki-absolutist problem with anything being considered "self-evident", then this whole section has to go, as it has a far worse problem on the same lines, that of presenting Blomkvist's uncited speculations as themselves being axiomatic. If anything has to go, it should start there.