:Of course the writer failed to report that 7 of 9 editors who !voted in that discussion were opposed to the inclusion of Cali as a casualty, and that the inclusion was ultimately removed. And that the use of "alleged" with respect to the kidnapping and murder was likewise rejected by all but a few editors, though retained (or replaced with "suspected") for the exposition of assumed facts which can and will never be proven. All in all, a very selective and distorted presentation concerning the discussions that occurred here. And why on earth is the writer rehashing this now, more than a year after those discussions ended?  Somebody needs to find a real job.