:Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs.  About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good.  To be clear, it certainly is "good enough" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation.  But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are "strange".  Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct?   

 :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements by those who oppose the protests are utterly and amazingly untrue.  I don't know if the French use the phrase, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink", but that is certainly what we are dealing with in the US right now.  People watch Fox news and really do believe what they hear.  They think that a more liberal news outlet is controlled by commies, socialists, or whoever else their anti-God and Country boggie men are.  It won't do any good to edit the article to say that "Hannity, (for instance) was proved wrong...", and besides that is stating a POV in the article.  But if you have another notable person that refuted his statements in an acceptable source, we'll see what we can do?  Best, gandy