== bias in the article == 

 I can't quite put the finger on it but something is wrong (somewhere between non-encylopedic to fallacious) with this article 
 it's like "we're trying to be objective but we just hate the guy" 
 something with the global temperature graph with one of his quote to make him out to be a liar while the thruth isn't that black and white ... I'm not exactly sure what but somehow it just doesn't feel right, as much as I hate the guy I won't steep as low as having double standard for him (like he does for the haibu graib prisoners when he said essentially that it was ok to torture them because if they were in cell block 1A then they we're murderers and terrarist probably with american blood on their hands (has if the nationality of who they killed mattered, or as if they actually had a trial or as if just because they did something wrong in the eyes of their captors they were suddenly sub-human ....  what a pig that guy is ! (  )) ~~ wikipedia ate domn dot net