I remove the following because it's clearly complete rubbish. 

 Discussions of white separatism are generally difficult due to a conflict between two points of view, each accusing the other of supremacist hypocrisy: 

 #Those opposing white separatism generally claim there are few if any white separatists  only white supremacists claiming to be white separatists.   
 #The white separatist general counter-claim is that by denying self-determination to whites, their opponents are supremacist hypocrites. 

 While the first point is covered elsewhere. The second is obvious rubbish, because opponents of white separatism generally believe in all races being treated equally in an integrated society. No-one could reasonably accuse such people of being supremacist. You can't even accuse them of denying whites their rightful place of superiority (remember, you're a separatist, not a supremacist). All you can accuse your opponents of in general is believing that the races should be integrated rather than separated, and that's not supremacist.