I've made a few changes to this page. I removed the original language (the place for that is on Wikisource). I've added an introduction outlining some of the problems involved in constructing a chronology of Anglo-Saxon England, though I feel more needs to be said on how and for what purpose annals and chronicles were written. I also removed the reference to the 1917 article - that was based heavily on Historia Brittonum which has received a mammoth of attention since then, especially by David Dumville. I'm not saying this isn't important, but one wouldn't cite an article written in 1917 as the main source for a Wikipedia article on the structure of the atom: such a reference belongs in a section on changes in interpretations. Such historiography is sadly missing in many Wikipedia history articles. If anyone feels the chanes I have made here are unjustified, then please first have a read of Sub-Roman Britain and History of Anglo-Saxon England, and some of the academic works recommended there, before reverting what I have done.