== Please stop enforcing your partisan opinion == 

 Farcaster - I have attempted several times to place a balanced, nonpartisan comment that shows that the tax rate / tax revenues tradeoff operates in both directions, depending on where you are on the curve, and on what the money's alternatives are (go offshore, reclassify into loopholes etc). 

 You simply keep deleting it unilaterally, without any rationale except your opinion.  This, i believe, is unacceptable behavior.  Your on statements show that reducing tax rates can increase tax revenues (from the 100% point). Bend that its merely a matter of debating the shape of the curve. 

 I don't delete your contributions, even though they appear to lead readers to one political conclusion.  I dont expect you to delete mine, especially when i chose to take a substantially higher road and let the reader understand the situation. 

 In your rationale for editing you state there is no evidence for reductions in taxes raising revenues.  Actually, its fairly ambiguous, but then, i would not expect it to work in our current tax structure, and certainly not quickly.  People are wiser than many statisticians believe and realize that short term changes int he tax code are not a reason to make long term investment, plant location, and career bets. And when they do, they take years to come to fruition - often confusing the correlation unless a long and sliding window or convolution is applied. So the very little evidence we have today certainly does not disprove the rule; nor help us figure out where we are on th curve. 

 Personally, i believe that we exist on BOTH sides of the curve simultaneously. By this i mean that many people are paying - all taxes included - well over 50%. Those who earn wages; live in hgih cost areas; and have few deductions.  On the other hand, people far "richer", or who can shelter their income in various ways pay very low rates.  Mr. Buffett is a good example. But few listened to what he actually said - he didn't say "tax the rich" he said "make it fair an equitable".  

 So its pretty simple. You can argue where we are on the curve, but you cannot deny the curve.  Therefore, your edits slant the truth and shelter readers from objective tools to make their own decisions.  Furthermore, i have no idea who you think you are to enforce topical and political agendas.  Nothing i wrote is debatable technically. Politically, truth seems to have no place.  So please quit deleting things. If you wish to make constructive contributions - please do.   

 I left you my email contact info and you chose ti ignore it.  So i take from that you have nothing to say - only to take away. 

 anjasdad