::This old fallacy? The 'left wing' is defined in opposition to the 'right wing.' This means that the 'left wing' will include groups that disagree with one another, in the same way that "heresy" is not a unified body of thought, but defined by the rejection of some orthodoxy. Saying that two heretical ideas disagree does nothing to demonstrate whether those ideas are on different parts of the political spectrum. The Chinese Communists conflicted with the USSR. That doesn't make either "right wing." I seriously doubt that you'd accept assertions from Neo-Nazis in regards to their views of themselves (and would fairly reject it as "original research" on my part when it comes to inclusion on this page), since you've ignored those statements made by Hitler so far. But I'll try taking you at your word and see whether you'll actually accept the evidence you claim should be used. I've spent a few minutes dredging the garbage of Stormfront's forums. There are a few pro-capitalist posters, but the majority favor a collective, racially homogenous, anti-religious form of socialism. A few posts; 

 ::A free-market capitalist democracy is easy to corrupt; look at how far the Jew has gotten in the United States! I also blame greedy owners of corporations with the decline of culture and values; many of them Jewish. The free market helps the Jew thrive, If it was regulated like in NS Germany (and they were also kicked out of the country) no Jews or corrupt gentiles could try to overrun the country in sake of their own profit!  
 http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t809507/ 

 ::I think that, in America, the United states is too big for national Socialism (or any socialism) to work without corruption. A socialist state-unit (i.e. an area of land and population where the economy is governed socialistically) should be no bigger than a township if it is to thrive in a morally positive way, so that is the only form of socialism I support. 
 http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t809507-2/ 

 ::Under NS there would be no nonwhites so how the hell are you going to be forced to hire them. That statement you made is quite ridiculous. Also as for people just sitting at home getting free money again ridiculous. NS had at its core the concept of protecting its kin if they fell on hard times if they were starving or dying in hospital. Of course you would let them die or starve. I see this more and more from the Americans on this site that money not their folk are their driving passion in life. 

 ::As for national socialism having a chance of success in America its close to zero due to history media and Americans hatred for any kind of Socialism( even if it is to help their own folk). In Europe it is a very different story. A lot of the social programs introduced by NS have been in use in Scandinavian Country's for the last 70 years with great success. The Nordic Country's having the highest standard of living in the world along with universal healthcare etc. So yes you can get rich(as the above poster wants) and also have some level of Socialism. Of course the Scandinavian Country's are falling apart now due to the increased burden of nonwhites(25% of Sweden). So we can see that NS works when a homogeneous society exists but not otherwise. 
 http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t809507-2/