, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 

 :Certainly, I would not ask you to include something in Wikipedia solely on the basis of anecdotal evidence; what I'm trying to convince you of is that claiming that adultery between a married woman and an unmarried man only is prima facie ridiculous in modern usage.  Also, I certainly do not object in any way to having an explanation of historical usage and the fact that it used to be considered a property-type crime.  I am not pushing any type of anti-sexist POV here; I am disputing the definition you are attempting to give having reviewed sources on the matter. - |  21:52