:::::Be aware that this is being reported in very reliable sources on this side of the pond, the Chicago Sun-Times , Minneapolis StarTribune, New York Daily News  and many others. This may well be "tabloid rubbish", and "self-promotional soapboxing", but it is getting a lot of ink in reliable sources over here. I've already had comments on my talk page about this and now my reviewer's status is suspect because of a reasoned question?  I asked for specific Wikipedia policies and still haven't received an answer.  WP:BLP has strict rules, yes, but when that many reliable sources report an event I feel the response I've received is a serious overreaction.  My addition was factual and completely NPOV, and yet somehow it is judged as "disgusting" and dismissed as "poor judgement".  Like I said, I could care less if it is there or not, but people really need to tone it down.  Quote specific policy, not opinion.