::As anyone can see via the link I provided, the passage did have a secondary source when you removed it.  I do hope other editors check the listed sources  it will be quite obvious that "mention in passing" is absurd, indeed #s 5 through 8 above are all about Reardon's critique.  Jaes's view on what is required for inclusion are idiosyncratic in my view and I'd be quite interested to hear other views.