::::: Pls explain where are "this is not an article about Menargues", etc. in the following text what you're reverting (?): 

 Lebanese journalist Michael Young wrote in 2004 that Menargues' allegations were based on the Lebanese commission investigated the massacres and former military prosecutor Asaad Germanos' report. Young has also noted that this report was never published and expressed a hope that Menargues' allegations which "are political dynamite against Israel", will be clarified by Lebanese authors.Michael Young  Embarrassing 'secrets' and Bashir Gemayel's rise to power, 2004;  
 * "Menargues' source for the allegation about the Israelis is the Lebanese commission that investigated the massacres, but also the person who supervised it, former military prosecutor Asaad Germanos. Unfortunately, the Germanos inquiry report was never published (and it's unclear how or even whether Menargues read it), and those morsels that did leak out hardly showed it to be impartial. So are Menargues allegations, which are political dynamite as regards Israeli behavior, true?  That and many other issues discussed in "Secrets" have been woefully under-investigated in the past decades. Menargues has done a service by asking the right questions, but also by trying to answer several of them. Hopefully, from now on more Lebanese authors will pursue that belated task" 
 
 ::::: What I see is not about Menargues, but about the allegations in his book.