:I have absolutely not taken a position like you are suggesting for me.  In the New Rochelle area articles that I agreed to take over, not including the Glen Island Park one, i have removed material that was not adequately sourced.  I am fine with the articles being boring and stubby.  That reminds me, i'll return to List of New Rochelle neighborhoods to switch in a boring stub type alternative that i developed, see its Talk page to see some evidence more in line with how I prefer the situation be handled (involving talking about sources, removing material to talk pages, in a boring lowkey way, etc.).  I am not defending the language that was in the Glen Island Park article.  So, you have not understood the whole situation and/or my role in it. 

 :At commons, I have not generally been active, but recently I posed some questions and I pointed out errors that Orlady has made, which i think is legitimate to do. 

 :I do think that O has behaved badly in the enforcement game she has engaged in, in particular showing disregard for collateral damage, working in ways to block out others' taking a constructive role, and more which tend to perpetuate and extend the warring that has gone on.  Some of which is in the 2 wp:an discussions, but not much, as those were closed quickly before the problem was talked out.  I am indeed interested in a bigger solution than just fighting in one article after another.  Let me browse a bit about yourself, too.  I don't currently see a solution in sight.