:Why assume that good edits will be reverted, or that "Daly-haters" are the only people besides you who edit here? As I said, the right thing to do from a Wikipedia standpoint is to add balancing material. If it's well-sourced, I'll help make sure it is retained. But wholesale deletion of any and all criticism of someone who I'm sure you'd agree is the most controversial politician in San Francisco is a significant violation of NPOV, and raises questions of attempted article ownership and conflict of interest. Continuing to make massive reverts, after being warned, with the remark "I figure it's easier just to engage in the revert war" is a pretty certain way to get blocked or banned.