::: (1) In what way is it "mischaracterizing the source"? (2) In what way does it imply "that the increase in restrictions is part of the WoW"? Guttmacher doesn't participate in the politics, and therefore doesn't mention the WOW, AFAIK. Its numbers are used by Zeller as documentation for the fact that Republican legislation (if you know what's been happening, you would know that it is GOP legislation...) has been very much against abortion rights. That's an undeniable fact. It's a major part of the GOP platform. Guttmacher only documents what has happened, and Wikipedia states what Guttmacher has shown, without taking sides in the matter. That's our job here. (3) Is what they document being restated accurately? (4) Doesn't Guttmacher document abortion restrictions? (5) As to whether "Zeller's premise should come first," I already mentioned that as a possible solution above. (6) Why didn't you respond to it? That can easily be fixed. Do it instead of just complaining. Your complaining seems more like attempts to whitewash or gut this article. Why not be constructive? We're trying to build an encyclopedia, not tear it down. 

 ::: You have six points to respond to. Just use the numbers and respond. Let's get this fixed through collaboration.