:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) 
 This is an outstanding article!  I wish I could offer more feedback, but I had difficulty finding things to improve. 
 #It is reasonably well written. 
 #:a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
 #:: This was all very good.  The lead especially was a good encapsulation of the article as a whole. 
 #It is factually accurate and verifiable. 
 #:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  
 #:: I expected this to be a problem, but actually the sourcing is impeccable.  Good job! 
 #It is broad in its coverage. 
 #:a (major aspects):  b (focused):  
 #:: I admire your strength in resisting the temptation to include a detailed fictional character biography. 
 #It follows the neutral point of view policy. 
 #:Fair representation without bias:  
 #::  
 #It is stable. 
 #:No edit wars, etc.:  
 #::  
 #It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. 
 #:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
 #:: Other than perhaps adding an image of Felming, no problems here. 
 #Overall:  
 #:Pass/Fail:  
 #:: I have left a couple suggestions below, but they are quite minor.  I am happy to pass this, and if you intend to take this to FAC I don't foresee any problems. 

 ==Comments== 
 *Prose: an average intake of sixty custom-made cigarettes.  I think you mean sixty custom-made cigarettes per day. 
 *Images: Have you considered adding an image of Ian Fleming? 
 *Structure: For the continuation Bond works, would it make sense to put the Kingsley Amis material above the John Gardner material, since he came before Gardner chronologically? 
 *Tastes and style: It may not be necessary to have such an exhaustive list of the drinks from On Her Majesty's Secret Service. 
 *Prose''': This extravagance was more noteworthy for Bond eating exotic, local foods when abroad, at a time when most of his readership did not travel abroad.'' I do not understand this sentence.  "More noteworthy" in comparison to what?