::::::From the above it appears a consensus is emerging, however I would be interested to have other users' input after they also have read WP:UKVILLAGES.   If kept I would want there to be inserted "and is a small locality", since if you live in the former park to the southeast in Reigate as some do then it is true to say that they live in Gatton, Reigate.  However the only quibble with this is that  "settlements with people living in them are automatically assumed to be notable" is false, for instance any suburb of a town does not merit its own article, its history, politics and geography are born out of and identical to its town; they go under a paragraph in the main article itself.  I mean take Stoke, Guildford for example, it would be absurd to put that as a separate article, per the policy above.  This means that Reigate could easily have the same treatment under Reigate and a clear link to Gatton Park and to the historic MP's borough within such a subsection.  I am sure the residents of Wray Lane would have no qualms to this, just as no article on Wray Common itself should ever be created per the policy.  Otherwise we would have one on every town 'pocket' which would do no favours to wider understanding of matters such as history, politics and industry and compartmentalise everywhere to the nth degree.   That would be estate agents' seventh heaven and heaven knows who else's.