: I disagree that they're too interwoven, and I think that's just a historical artifact of the similarities of the name of the virus and the condition. But I understand that it's hard to explain why without providing links to content that isn't in Wikipedia yet. How about this  we move the existing article to "Hepatitis B", keeping all the existing virology content in whatever format you prefer, and thus inheriting its existing "good article" status. (I gather from your comments elsewhere that this is one of your concerns, so I hope this would address it.) I could then create a new article for "Hepatitis B virus", modeling it to rise to about this level of detail initially, though hopefully surpassing it someday. I won't interfere with the "Hepatitis B" article. Are there any objections?