== Can you help me with this issue or tell me what I have to do? Please, reply to ratresende@gmail.com == 

 PLEASE BE RESPECTFUL AND HONEST WITH THE USERS OF WIKIPÉDIA 

 The Wikipédia can't cheat a honest man. 

 

 Dear Sirs, 

 Once again... (I'm wating your reply). 

 (...) 

 I have been block for suspicion of being a sock puppet after a check user. I know I am not a sock puppet, so is impossible the check user be positive. 

 Several of times, I and other users asked for a check user to my account to dissipate any suspicion about the issue (because they accuse-me to be a sock puppet). But our request was always reject for these (group) users.  

 However, know, the "group of users" decided to make a "check user". It is strange and uncommon, because 2 days ago they rejected my check user proposal.  

 In the past, they admit in their discussion pages, they make a me check user and the check user was inconclusive (this in half-words). Know the result is positive?  Is impossible. I know that. I am not a "sock puppet". 

 All I ask to Wikimedia foundation is that an administrator check the merits of the block and to verify the check user. Send me the results by email, because is impossible this result.  

 I think these groups (with administrators) are trying making a fraud to eliminate my participation.  

 Put yourself in my shoes and imagine the frustration.  

 http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Rightsideclub – The other user 

 http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Rui_Resende – Me 

 http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:CheckUser/Pedidos_de_verifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o&oldid;=7251137 – The check user rejected by "the group of users" 

 http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:CheckUser/Pedidos_de_verifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o&oldid;=7309116 – The same  check user approved by "the group of users". 

 Sincerely,  

 Rui Resende