== Accusations of vandalism == 

 Hello again! 

 I see that you removed the last message I posted on here citing it as offensive. Removing any messages I leave here is perfectly fine but I meant no offense and I do apologize if I came across bitey even though it really was not my intention to do so. 

 However, I stand by what I said and I will ask you again very politely that you reconsider leaving edit summaries in which you refer to edits with which you disagree as vandalism, such as you did in these edits: , , , , , , , , . All of these vandalism accusations were made after the last time I asked you not to do so. Again, the reason I ask you not to accuse people of vandalism in these situations is because of the fact that these types of articles will inevitably attract editors with different opinions and labelling someone as a vandal simply because their opinion differs from yours can prove to be unhelpful to the extreme if your intent is to create consensus in articles whose subject matter makes it difficult in itself to create consensus. Please don't do that anymore and, again, read through WP:VAND to see why these edits you refer to as vandalism do not qualify as such. 

 Also, Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/Archive 29, same as most other archives, states in bold letters Do not edit the contents of this page. You have now edited that archive 3 times (, , ) to remove text you find undesirable or, in your own words, offensive. This is also not helpful. Archives are meant to preserve past discussions and refactoring them may make it very difficult for someone to refer to what was said about a particular subject matter at some later point in time. I will revert your edit in that archive shortly and I expect you not to revert it back.  

 If you do delete that text again or if you keep accusing people of vandalism, I will report you to the administrators and ask that you be sanctioned. 

 Thanks!   •