::::Thanks for your patience! All seems resolved, but here's the back-and-forth for future reference: 
 :::::• Ozzie10aaaa added "On November 1, it was reported that there might be a decrease in the number of cases, however it is still not certain why ,http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/31/the-un-s-big-asterisk-on-liberia-s-ebola-case-decrease.html "local culture is also distorting the figures. Traditional burial rites involve relatives touching the body – a practice that can spread Ebola – so the Liberian government has ruled that Ebola victims must be cremated", one source was cited as saying.http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/19/ebola-liberia-death-toll-data-sorious-samura" 
 :::::• I (FourViolas) reverted with the comment, "(Undid revision 632278400 by Ozzie10aaaa (talk) Couple issues: Dailybeast.com isn't WP:Reliable enough for such a claim, and citing the news needs more than a url.)" 
 :::::• Ozzie10aaaa reverted my reversion with, "Undid revision 632279222 by FourViolas (talk) we will find a different source then. thank you" and deleted the DailyBeast reference with, "I hope that reference is better mister [sic]. have a nice day" 
 :::::• I came here (see above), and later added a  with the comment, "added , material remains noncompliant with MoS" 
 :::::• Ozzie10aaaa supplied refs to an article in marines.mil,http://www.marines.mil/News/NewsDisplay/tabid/3258/Article/535607/liberia-us-build-ebola-treatment-centers-decrease-virus-growth-rate.aspx which didn't mention a decrease in infection rate, and a USA Today article which did.http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/10/29/who-ebola-meeting/18107705/  
 :::::• Following the lead to the WHO press briefing referenced in the second citation, and my own unjustified feeling that USA Today is a good but not the best possible source, I changed the two sentences in question to  
 ::::::"On 29 October, the WHO announced that the rate of new infections in Liberia was declining, but urged continued vigilance against a reversal of this trend. "  
 ::::: with comment "Thanks for pointing to the WHO press conference. I rewrote in line with a good source. Please note the citation template:cite news" 
 :::::• Ozzie10aaaa, with (imo) justified suspicion of my "precocious edit history", brought their suspicions to , who had broached her own suspicions previously . (btw, I categorically deny being a sockpuppet, and understand but am saddened by the interpretation of my good-faith efforts to learn the rules before editing as evidence against me.) 
 ::::Was that TMI, TLI, or just right?