Though, after consideration, I must say you acted rather poorly in this situation. You ignored a cite for my edit after I directed you to the talk page where I had placed it and, instead, you preferred to chide me, a relatively new user, for an error in citation. You chose to make a knee-jerk reversion without checking the fact under contention. You actually restored incorrectly cited material, and multiple times, too. Further, you blindly conflated one journalist's opinion with, as you put it on my talk page, a "summar[y] of reputable published opinion." As the Wikipedia page on genre says, "in all art forms, genres are vague categories with no fixed boundaries"; as such, any argument about genre must rely on a range of published opinion, not one the words of one (incorrectly sourced) journalist. These are all errors that would be infinitely forgivable if made by ordinary users. That they were made by an admin, someone who assumedly has invested a good deal of time in Wikipedia, speaks poorly for you.