::::::::Well well, your accusation that the non-involved editors "who voted Agree [should be Disagree] are mostly Canvassed from you side" is a blatant accusation on the respected editors who troubled to voice their opinion regarding the matter. Do you have any proof to say so? If I want the details regarding the civil war completely removed from the article, then why did I bother to add chunks of information on the origin, evolution and the effects of civil war, plus the alleged human rights abuses in their relevant sections?