::::My view that Dacian is related to the Baltic languages is based on the comparison of Dacian plant names, the only reliable corpus of Dacian words surviving (if one discounts the infamous gold tablets!), with Lithuanian equivalents. I posted this table on your page in February, but you didn't comment at the time: 

 Looking at the Dacian plant names, apart from personal and place-names, there are a few parallels with Lithuanian, although mainly in genera, not species: 

 {| class = wikitable 
 |Plant 
 |Dacian 
 |Lithuanian 
 |- 
 |Anise (genus Apiaceae) 
 |SALIA 
 |SALIAVAS (peucedanum - Apiaceae) 
 |- 
 |Elderberry 
 |SEBA 
 |ŠEIVA 
 |- 
 |Centaury 
 |STIRSOZILA 
 |ŠIRDAZOLĖ 
 |- 
 |Wormwood (genus Artemisia) 
 |ZUSTER 
 |ŽUIKSALOTĖ (Mycelis - genus Artemisia) 
 |- 
 |Hemlock (genus Apiaceae) 
 |ZENA 
 |ZUNDA (Eryngium - Apiaceae) 
 |- 
 |Redstem Wormwood (family Asterceae) 
 |ZIRED 
 |ŽYDRUNIS (whiteweed - Asteraceae) 
 |} 

 Also, the Dacian plant names often end in -DILA, -DULA or -ZILA, which is close to the Lithuanian word ŽOLĖ, which means a grass or herb e.g. Dac. STIRSO-ZILA Lith. ŠIRDA-ŽOLĖ (Centaury). If Dacian was connected to the Baltic languages, it is further evidence that the Romanians are not descended from the Dacians at all, but from Romance speakers from South of the Danube. OK, this is pretty thin, but that's inevitable, since the evidence is very thin. But the Baltic connection is not my own theory. It has been proposed by linguists, also based on some Dacian placenames.