, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 

 :::Again, there is no need to accuse people of having an agenda. I have no objection to having information about OWS here. My only agenda is in how Wikipedia can best serve its purpose of providing readers with the information that they are looking for. As currently written, the content of this article can be summarized thus: 

 :::*Some segments of the OWS movement use hand signals to guide discussion, a statement supported by numerous news sources. 
 :::*Duplication of content in Consensus_decision-making#Hand_signals 
 :::*Some idiosyncratic names used for some of these signals. As a source for this, we only have three youtube videos, each of which gives a different set of signals/names, and all of which are anonymous uploads from people involved with the movement, not reliable secondary sources. 

 :::The first point can be expressed in a single sentence, the second is redundant, and the third does not appear to be notable at this time, so I think it would be better to merge this into Consensus_decision-making#Hand_signals and Occupy Wall Street.    21:25