::::::: Please back up your claim (5 editors) with IP adresses. Please note that my list of editors included only those that took part in this discussion. If you count those who edited the article in a way that supports your position, you also have to add those who reverted or removed the content you and MrCrazyFrog are trying to promote. As for "some of those against have merely stated incorrectly that the sources are unreliable" - please write who you believe it was; as for "incorrectly" - that is not the opinion of the author of the statement, am I right? Who decided they stated it incorrectly?