Interestingly when I was first ill I had massive liver dysfunction, weakness, falls with loss of consciousness, bladder problems (now established as neurogenic bladder, grossly abnormal alongside abnormal multi-site photoplethysmography). New neurologist Dr. Gorman along with Prof. Newton has diagnosed a generalised dysautonomia. I am also under investigation for the interestingly MRI negative hereditary spastic paraplegia with the clinical impression from examination being that family history and neurological examination all point towards this although "a generalised dysautonomia would explain most of your presentation". The neurologist I first saw wrote in my notes "no organic basis whatsoever...wholly psychological" though oddly this letter (which I copied in pen) has now vanished from my medical notes. I was seen by the head of mental health services who asked for further tests for oragnic illness, this was ignored. 

 I only got further help and investigation via the help of Byron Hyde and his contacts in Whitehall. Physicians are very very fallible something you know all too well.  I note the Hyde article has been deleted again even though Edward Shorter describes him as notable in "From Paralysis to fatigue". I do not know Shorter but I do know via e-mail some of his colleagues at the ABNP. 

 With the greatest respect Jacob you do tend to conduct yourself on this website as though you are some cult member. I don't mean this as abuse, it is just an observation and one you will appreciate shared by others. You also act as though you are infallible and that there is absolute truth to which you strive. This of course is not the case. The sad thing is that this "cult like" behaviour was why I caused so much disruption on wikipedia. I simply thought it was a pointless activity as it could never reflect the diverse and often contradictory nature of human knowledge. This does not signify my return to wikipedia I will simply continue to create accounts and edit as I please when bored- yet again a sign of the pointless nature of the project. 

 The other reason I don't want to get involved is that as I have said before I do know personally many of the people involved in this debate, something I suspect you do not. I therefore owe it to them not to get involved in the kiddies sand pit that is wikipedia. I consider the fact that I bothered to engage in debate with you, Jimbo,or anyone else on wikipedia as an intellectual error of vast proportions. You can't talk sense to a hockey mom. I do not believe that an infinite number of monkeys can produce Shakespeare nor that you at the exclusion of the ME community can produce a multifaceted and worthwhile account of Wessely. "Wessely is hated by many people for all sorts of reasons, he is a deeply embattled man"- personal acquaintance of Wessely's.