== Response to your ideas on HappyApple's Page == 
 You said the Korean articles are in bad shape because nobody edits themI improved them a lot by removing the images with copyright problems, improving them so they are much closer to feature article statusthey never would get there with bad images.  I'm glad you think I did it consistently and with enough energy like it was my job. 

 English does not necessarily equal the United States... but English Wikipedia does revolve around English speakers, so it's important to stick to the concepts and phrases they are most likely to use.  I'm not sure what you're complaining aboutthere are redirects getting them to the page if they search for your "obscure" term.  Some foreign terms have made it into English, but that doesn't mean all foreign words are suddenly part of the English lexiconthe idea is we stick to what people know.  By your own admission, "Imjin War" is "hardly used at all"that means it's not a very good main title. 

 Your example of tome is a good one.  Tome and book are both words describing similar thingsbut which would you choose for the main title of the article?  Oei Invasion is different because people learn that term, not some other term. 

 I regret that you are disillusionedbut I'm even more disappointed that you'd let the fact that the fact that your pet name doesn't happen to be the main title stop you from wanting to edit at all!  Please, stick with itI know you can make some more good contributions if you keep trying. —''''''