*Comment: I would support this version, but for one thing. I think the refs used to support narrow shouldn't be others describing the election as narrow but sources but a source that has statistics showing that it is narrow. Such as this one from the University at Buffalo: 
 :"Though not as close as the 2000 election in terms of the popular vote, the 2004 election was the ninth closest presidential election since the Civil War and the fourth closest in terms of electoral votes..."