:And you do not see the irony in my being the one that is blocked? 
 as one should plainly see, Kraxler has been adding the edits that have no citation or blatant misrepresentation in the "v" reference when the that exposes as mumbo jumbo about anglicized surnames having ANYTHING to do with the surname Van Rensselaer (capitalized correctly ONLY because it is standing alone), is a mere three inches away from the mistaken editors focus.... not me. so evidently it may still be a question of rhetoric, but on whose part?