::::::: Okey-doke: no, Goldenberg did not say "despite evidence to the contrary."  Question answered, yes?  But that is a trivial point.  I would, as suggested, be 'misrepresenting the source' were I to insert into a quote or other direct form of attribution something along the lines as my append to the proposition.  However, as stated, Dlabtot is not quoting Goldenberg but is rather fielding a proposition that he has derived from an article Goldenberg has authored.  There is ample...no, vast...precedence for synthesizing two sources in a single propositional statement in scholarly writing.  If you/yall would prefer, the propositional sentence can be edited to have both citations occur at the terminal point of the statement, or we can agree to redact the content to the appropriate subheading as is precedent in several other Wikipedia articles.  According to my review of Wikipedia content, having this content appear in the lead is unprecedented.  Why-oh-why does Fibromyalgia merit such special treatment  pray tell!