:Ok, but what in WP:UNDUE supports that logic? While your idea makes perfect sense, it can't be implemented without breaking policy. "In general, articles should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more widely held views; generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all... Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. To give undue weight to the view of a significant minority, or to include that of a tiny minority, might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute." I just can't see how including the opinion of that editor into this article, as is, can possibly conform to this policy.