:::If we do a google search for "Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations" on its own, we get 663,000 hits..  
 :::If we perform the same search, but limit the results to those under ".gov", we get 441,000. 
 :::These means only 222,000 pages use the term outside of the Federal government. 
 ::: However, is we limit the search to the ".us" top level domain, usually used by State goverments and public schools we get 54,300 hits. 
 ::: This leaves the probable total of pages not related to US government activity, at around 165,000.   
 :::A similar search in the ".UK" domain - a major english speaking country - yield 70 hits, most of them similar, and most of them related to publications republishing US material.  
 :::(This pretty much proves that the term "CAFO" is only used in the USA, and mostly in a legalistic, non-colloquial way.) 

 ::: Now, lets do the same with "Factory farming". 
 ::: Total hits: 521,000  
 ::: Total hits ".gov": 355  
 ::: Total hits ".us": 10,900  
 ::: Approximate total non-US government (federal/state): 510,000, over 345,000 hits higher than CAFO. 
 ::: Total ".uk": 33,600. Wow. The term is used 33,530 time more than CAFO in the United Kingdom... this means CAFO is obviously a US only term. 

 :::CAFO is not only an ugly, legalistic, made-by-committee term, but use of the term would reveal an obvious geographic bias that automatically classifies it as a Geographically biased, and hence completely outside the rules. Use of this term would be a total violation of neutrality, and insistence in its inclusion as a title -after knowing it is geo-biased- is a WP:POINT conduct.