:But we are now stuck with an article which doesn't help when someone wants to find out how to become a ham. I do think looking in wikipedia, someone just might actually expect to find that in this article. Granted, zillions of clubs are not helpful, and linking within Wikipedia should be done, but I do think we need a very generic list of major organization is essential.I also agree that any links should go to wikipedia articles on such organizations. I can't see why we would not have listings of the ARRL, RAC, RSGB, DARC and WIA at the very least. Where to draw the line? I don't know! I'd rather have too many than none! Currently, though your heart was in the right place, the removal of all club and organizations arbitrarily was more harmful than helpful.