What is this mess? The source you provided sucks. This list of books and newspapers is meaningless because none of it supports the contention you are trying to insert into the article. Your sole support is something written by a guy named John Pounders in something called The New World Order (which is suspicious on its face) and reprinted on a webpage called "Frugalfun". You try to cite to suggest you are citing the Saturday Evening Post, but you're not. We have no idea whether the alleged quote is accurate. Even if it were, it still does not mean what you tried to add is acceptable. Your continual assertion that the Fed "was largely a response to a planned manipulation by a cabal of America's wealthiest citizens" is totally unsupported even by the crappy source you provided. The only thing remotely like that in your source is the assertion that the Fed (and the Jekyll meeting) was a response to the panic "purportedly created by J. P. Morgan". I have to admit that I still think you're just a troll, but I felt that if you were somehow (against all odds) well meaning, but just a little off, you deserved a response. -