Ok, to reply to Flyer22 following comments directly since I don't remember doing so - You wrote (parts I'm replying to anyway):  
 *What I did object to was your odd complaint that the Evidence and Witness testimony sections both mention some of the evidence. Well, yeah, that's expected. Exactly how is that avoidable? It's not like we shouldn't have an Evidence section or that it should be merged with the Witness testimony section. Basically all the evidence is presented as witness testimony in its latest iteration at trial. 
 *You also wrote: And moving the material up to the Investigation section does not solve anything, because the evidence will still be mentioned in two or more spots (which is perfectly accepetable/fine/expected). I'll correct my proposal to be that statements about earlier versions of evidence submitted be moved up to end of Arrest and Charges since it was after that that evidence was submitted; also a sentence or two on the grand jury evidence might be relevant to all that. I can do a bit more research on that.  
 *Anyway, my next step is to do a draft User page of my proposed chrono order in the Witness testimony section with only evidence wording that's in now (except as mentioned above and any obvious minor corrections/tweaks that are necessary). So we don't need to have generalized debates and can wait til that's available.  I just presented a heads up above to see what people might suggest.