== Wikipedia community. == 

 I'm hesitant about doing this, as I don't want you to take it in the wrong way. But I would like to give some advice about how to go forward to becoming a good member of the Wikipedia community. Going over your edit history, it seems that you've made a good start in that direction. You've made edits that are good faith efforts that are not driven by any motive except the desire to improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. That, I think, is the key. Edits that are made with the desire to improve Wikipedia will be seen positively by other editors, edits made with any other motive will be seen negatively. 

 If you want to be a trusted member of our community, first, I think it's a good idea to try to avoid wikidrama –  that is, messages that contain or elicit highly emotional responses. For instance, your messages to Gregalton were not appropriate or helpful. You should realize that if Satorison wanted to ban you, as an administrator, he could have done it immediately. It's ok to be an editor with a checkered past, as long as that past behavior is truly past, and you are prepared to play by all the rules going forward. Some rules to especially pay attention to are: WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA,  WP:NPV, WP:NOR, and WP:COI. 

 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest is also especially relevant here, as you have a particular interest in Constant Purchasing Power Accounting and topics that are related. A 'conflict of interest' is not limited to situations of potential monetary profit. A conflict of interest occurs whenever you have a strong desire for an article to read a certain way – when edits are not motivated mainly by a desire to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. It especially important to follow all the rules when dealing with topics that we have particularly strong interests in, as we are often blinded by our emotions in such situations.  

 As long as you follow community rules, I'm sure other users will be happy to see you as part of the community. Regards