I see that you added it to the James Wilmot less than a fortnight after it was published. I think that's pretty quick, myself. And I don't have time to look at the moment, but I'm pretty sure it was put into the Shakespeare authorship question article sourced from the book almost as soon as the ink was dry. 

 I think a larger point is that though his work is a big deal to the SAQ, his career isn't mostly concerned with the topic. To stress it in his biography article is a bit like having a major section in the George Washington article about his surveying career.