unsigned by Dr. Righteous 

 :I looked at furvert earlier and it seems long for its subject, but I could not find anything to remove.  The criticism/anti-furry section, I think it might need a better title than those twoI don't know if fursecution works.  One thing I'd say is that the whole section is mostly just an internet version of the media sensationalism.  I don't know if livejournals, forums, and the like are notable enough for wikipedia.  Sometimes articles have people that don't even think wikis and websites are notablelike Daniel Brandt is filled with editors who refuse even a two word mention that Brandt who doesn't like wiki articles on him and fought to get rid of his thing on wikipedia now his articles on other wikis now and I think this is very notable but the editors are all claiming websites and wikis aren't.  But I digress.  So...  the easiest thing is that there are four websites listed with articles in the section.  I assume those are notable.  Now Something Awful, Portal of evil, and Encyclopedia Dramatica are semi-tabloids whereas  Crush! Yiff! Destroy! is more of a criticism and Crush! Yiff! Destroy! has a large number of furries running its site while Encyclopedia Dramatica says at least one of its administrators is a furry (it may be only one) and this differentiates them between Something Awful and POE as well as being something WP:Verifiable.  I personally would like a good source (like a newspaper) for fursecution and furbashing; there used to be a fursecution article once.  For the blogs (including LiveJournal) and forums, I don't know if those are even notable.  Also, are furry printed magazines notable?  This would help.  This made furvert a passable term by the Amateur Press Association / Furversion printing.