" 
 :The problems are in sourcing and tone. Initially no sourcing at all was provided, which was the reason for removal - and rightly so. The random blog is simply not appropriate for inclusion. See WP:RS. The Gazette article may be sourced within reason. However, it is an opinion piece, not a matter of fact and must be presented as such, respectively; with appropriate weight (WP:DUE) and in context. Juvenile name calling is neither welcome nor permitted (WP:NPA). The tit-for-tat reverts are unacceptable as well (WP:DISRUPT) and will lead to being blocked (WP:BP). Wikipedia works by consensus (WP:CON). If there is a dispute on content, it should be resolved (WP:DR) without edit-warring, via the normal negotiation process and involved parties must be willing to reach a wp:compromise (which you are apparently not). Should edit warring continue w/o discussion, you both will be flagged over at WP:AN3 for Administrator intervention, and this page may be protected (WP:PP) to halt disruption. 

 :Please attempt to engage in discussion. Thank you. Namaste    "