COCKSUCKER BEFORE YOU PISS AROUND ON MY WORK
Bye!   Don't look, come or think of comming back! Tosser.
"  Re-considering 1st paragraph edit? I don't understand the reasons for 's recent edit of this article  not that I'm sure that the data are necessarily ""wrong.""  Rather, I'm persuaded that the strategy of introducing academic honors in the first paragraph is an unhelpful approach to this specific subject.  I note that articles about other sitting Justices have been similarly ""enhanced;"" and I also believe those changes are no improvement.    In support of my view that this edit should be reverted, I would invite anyone to re-visit articles written about the following pairs of jurists.  A1. Benjamin Cardozo  A2. Learned Hand   B1. John Marshall Harlan  B2. John Marshall Harlan II  The question becomes: Would the current version of the Wikipedia article about any one of them  or either pair  be improved by academic credentials in the introductory paragraph?  I think not.  Perhaps it helps to repeat a wry argument Kathleen Sullivan of Stanford Law makes when she suggests that some on the Harvard Law faculty wonder how Antonin Scalia avoided learning what others have managed to grasp about the processes of judging?  I would hope this anecdote gently illustrates the point.   Less humorous, but an even stronger argument is the one Clarence Thomas makes when he mentions wanting to return his law degree to Yale.  At a minimum, I'm questioning this edit?  It deserves to be reconsidered.   "
Radial symmetry   Several now extinct lineages included in the Echinodermata were bilateral such as Homostelea, or even asymmetrical such as Cothurnocystis (Stylophora).  -
Yes, because the mother of the child in the case against Michael Jackson was studied in here motives and reasonings and judged upon her character just as harshly as Wacko Jacko himself.  Don't tell me to ignore it and incriminate myself.  I am going to continue refuting the bullshit that Jayjg keeps throwing at me.   18:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Praise   looked at this article about 6 months ago -much improved. ]
"  BI, you said you wanted to talk  At the bottom of the lead section you have written:  ""Its promoter speculated in 1994 that the skyhook concept could be cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator, but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts. In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials"".""  Regarding:  In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials""  That statement appears to come from Ref [3] on page 10.  The full quote is  ""If the mass of the tether alone started to exceed 200 times the mass of the payload, then that was an indication the particular scenario being considered was not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials, although the application might become feasible in the near future as better materials become available with higher tensile strengths at higher operational temperatures.""  It then goes on to say  ""As we shall see, presently available commercial materials will suffice to make the HASTOL tethers needed. The primary message we want to leave with the Reader is: “We don't need magic materials like ‘Buckminster-Fuller-carbon-nanotubes’ to make the space tether facility for a HASTOL system. Existing materials will do.”""  So it would appear that you misread your reference.  The tether mass of 200 times mass of the payload mass is the upper limit to the problem.  Systems where the tether mass is less than 200 times the payload mass can be built with ""presently available commercial materials.""  To further reinforce this the Conclusion to the report states  ""The fundamental conclusion of the Phase I HASTOL study effort is that the concept is technically feasible. We have evaluated a number of alternate system configurations that will allow hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technologies to be combined with orbiting, spinning space tether technologies to provide a method of moving payloads from the surface of the Earth into Earth orbit. For more than one HASTOL architecture concept, we have developed a design solution using existing, or near-term technologies. We expect that a number of the other HASTOL architecture concepts will prove similarly technically feasible when subjected to detailed design studies. The systems are completely reusable and have the potential of drastically reducing the cost of Earth-to-orbit space access.""  Regarding: ""but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts."" and   ""A 2000 Boeing report on the possibillity of combining skyhooks with hypersonic planes concluded that ""In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts."".""  The full quote is:  ""HyperSkyhook  In 1995 Zubrin proposed the “Hypersonic Skyhook” as a solution to the mismatch between the attainable atmospheric speeds of a hypersonic airplane and the orbital speeds of space tethers. Since the orbital speed of the space tether decreases with increasing altitu
A Bisexual, like a homosexual or a heterosexual, is not defined by sexual activity. (Much like a 15 year old boy who is attracted to a girl sexually but has never had sex is still straight). A person who is actually sexually attracted/aroused by the same sex as well as the opposite sex is bisexual.
" Hi Thanks for our kind words. See you around ) Talk "
Check the following websites:  http://www.iranchamber.com/personalities/farabi/farabi.php http://www.islam.org.br/%C2%A0al_farabi.htm http://www.superbeyin.com/sohbet/sohbet.htm
Should say something about his views as an educationalist and socialist political commentator.  Link to http://www.langandlit.ualberta.ca/Fall2004/SteigelBainbridge.html mentions this a bit - he stood as an election candidate for Respect.
The statement drawn from Watchtower literature, honestly, not clandescently, not with hypocrisy, is drawn from Watchtower literature via Ray Franz's arguments and literature, and imposed into the Wikipedia article. It's too much of a coincidence that a more or less follower of Ray Franz is going to come up with a reference to Wa. literature on his own, exactly the same connection Ray Franz makes, without having first seen the connection made in Ray Franz literature.    Natural   Nature
Though this is certainly a small article, but it is not so inconsequential as to warrant subsuming it within the Flame Trees article.   It is a discography article, and should stand alone.   22 May 2005
06, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Yep. LOL, the [[Reformist Party (Serbia)|Reformist Party] is having another go (the 20th very last on the parliamentary election, winning less votes than notable to actually be mentioned). )  By the way, here's something very little people have figured out - the new Constitution of Serbia has been brought to enable Kosovo' secession. The 1990 Constitution barred that as a possibility, and after the Kumanovo Military-Technical Agreement was signed between NATO and FRY the SRS broke its coalition with SPS and the government collapsed, causing new elections - because that was unconstitutional, as an act of highest treason, enough to be tried from maximum sentence (which the Radicals demanded from then to his death, to have a trial in Serbia, and to be tried for treason among other reasons). This constitution releases the authorities from that weight, and they won't have to go to prison if they recognize any form of further loss of sovereignty in Kosovo. ;)   15
Userbox Hello. A userbox you are using (Template:User queerrights) has been moved to user space per WP:GUS. The new link is  and leave any questions you may still have on my talk page. Thank you.
"  SORRY PUCK BUT NO ONE EVER SAID DICK WAS NUMBER ONE!! But he is clearly listed as being ""second only to Batman"" and a ""master detective and martial artist"" and been trained in all the mentioned combat discplines. No need to mention in skills/abilities about the battles he's lost and won because thats not what an encylopia is supposed to do.   Also, what your problem is your going by low end showings and not HIGH end showings where he's proven more than a match for a meta like Slade and pinned Shiva down in one of his earliest appearences.  "
" PD: I just have seen that apart from the article Coat of arms of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, there is also a different article named Coat of arms of Western Sahara. That shows clearly that some users here have politically-driven intentions and bad faith, although they claim to be neutral. If they were neutral, logically they would work on the ""Coat of arms of Western Sahara"" article, intead of trying to merge the two articles and messing it.  "
"      Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Allowing username change to GianLuigiPalermo . Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.  Request handled by:     Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request."
And, of course, Peiser is more than just a social anthropologist.  He's one whose recent research has focused primarily on the social aspects of climate change and is thus at least as qualified to comment on the state of consensus as a historian.  Regarding his study, it hasn't been published in a peer-reviewed journal, but the results have appeared in many reliable sources.  In effect, it should be treated no differently than as if Peiser himself (or any other scientist) had verbally relayed the conclusions directly to a reporter.  Literally tens of thousands of Wiki articles contain such references direct quotes from scientists, which appear in no other source but through the medium of a reputable reporter.
"   29 August 2006  wow. i understand that the sentance I ""added"" was not crucial and really does not change the content. But what is this?! has the community not gotten smaller? was it not caused by the automobile? have I not sourced the statement as asked? is it not a fact? is it not information? does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was? is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present? is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not? if so it should be noted that I simply re-added the information after it was removed. was not the removal frivilous and unwarranted? what is the problem? why insist on the absence of this statement? it is unjustifiable. it is negligible. I am re adding the information as it is: A)factual, B) sourced, and C) informative. I assume that since there is no reason to remove it again (or in the first place) that you and all other Wiki Nazis will relax. If you are concerned with useless edits please see the edit fom the 26th. I know it was carried out by the great infallable Mindmatrix but imho that was the first useless change. "
") (ETA: John D. Haynes House. SarekOfVulcan (talk) "
, 16 December 2005 (UTC) Mendel doesn't talk about those changes at all.  Mendel was refering to the Conspiracy section that used to be there.  16:53
Absolutely, use of that word is strongly misleading, even with '-like'. The structure had nothing to do with mastaba - a burial chamber basicly. Mastaba by definition has entran & ceinner space. This structure was one solid pile of rocks, with no inner space or entrances. It was ment as a wall fragment.
Oh, also wouldn't films that are named Three or some variation thereof be listed on the disambig page and not on here? JUST WONDERING BECAUSE IT MAKES MUCH MORE SENSE TO ME  (I apologize in advance for certain individuals who are too sensitive to hear the truth)
Review Request   Hi,  I'd like to request KLM for a GA-class review. Can anyone do that? It seems to have many similar stuff to other GA's, such as Kenya Airways and Ethiopian Airlines. Cheers. '''BreaksFixes'''
"   Link to Sacramento   I placed a wikipedia-link in this article where the word ""Sacramento"" appears.  Another editor, who appears to be stalking me and is reverting everything that I do, claims that I am ""overlinking"" by doing this.  I have read the policy, and think I understand it, and I disagree with him.  The word ""Sacramento"" was not linked anywhere else in this article before I made the link, and I think that my link provided good context for a reader who did not know Walnut Creek but thought that maybe they knew Sacramento.  Was there anything wrong with my link?  I would like someone objective to give their opinions. 74.234.45.208  "
Your blatant POV pushing   Neither of you guys has made any contribution to this Italian history article other than to shove your unhistorical unconstructive modern POV in my face. This is a HISTORY article. HISTORY. Have you heard of that? This is the reason why so many people get pissed off about the pedantry and idiocy and triviality of Wikipedia. J*sus. Get a f*cking life.
I've abused NOTHING. Your threats are extremely disrespectful to the rules of Wikipedia. All I have ever done is tried to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles and maintain the standards of quality. I should NOT be treated like a vandal who only registered to muck up articles. My account should not be blocked. I should be an administrator. (  )
Give me a permanat block raseac....!!! remember me....!!! Muslims dont you worry for these images they are trying to hurt us but they cant look these images are fake and have nothing to do with Islam or our prophet even their article is so lame wikipedia is not an authentic source its an encyclopedia for the kids which has not authenticity anyone can edit or write whatever they think...just like raeasc you can see he does not knows what Islam is and he talks about it so forget about wiki its lame they have no authenticity...i recommend they should add pissed christ in jessus article....they should...
I FIND IT DIFFICULT TO CONTROL MY EMOTIONS and I still feel that Mr Logy Wogy was bad.
And check this out: http://www.cla.purdue.edu/blackmon/102cs2001/critical.html#bio
"::: You are wrong. Although I was blocked on some occasions, I was never blocked for Sockpuppetry or Vandalism. It was because of disputes on multiple topics with various socks of user:Hkelkar & user:VandalPetrol, both of which are permabanned. I have never used any other account. If you are permitted to edit then you should get other accounts deleted which says you are indeffed.  No-Blast   "
i only deleted personal attacks
Well I will use my user page then, don't tell meyour gonna remove it too, because that will piss me off and drive me nuts. Also I am not making a personal ttack on Jimmy wales, I am saying he is a bit to greedy dont you think? He's got 6 million dollars already and now he's asking for more.
I thought I would offer you some advise aswell: 1)No Wikipedia:Edit warring 2)No arguing with Wikipedia:Administrators 3)May I also remind you of the three-revert-rule
Bad Redirect  Please remove the redirect from the X-24C page, that aircraft was distinctly different in design, builder, mission, etc, and restore that aircrafts unique content to its page.75.67.80.68
" It's in the History, or more conveniently in your own contribs. Thank you for the explanation, but that wasn't a big deal. I was more upset by your second post—waving me off with a sneer about growing a thicker skin and a finger-waggle about ""profanity""—treating me as an insensate piece of internet polemic rather than a fellow human attempting to give an honest account of herself. An account which Mackensen promptly removed, as you say. Well, I understand that trying to contribute to the workshop was a bad idea in the first place—running full tilt into Tony Sidaway, after managing to avoid him on IRC for a whole month, to the immeasureable improvement of my quality of life. Anyway. I've always seen you as somebody who stands up for the underdog — I remember praising your addition of this edit to the Harassment guideline—and I was sad to see there was no mutuality of respect.  | talk ."
Thanks for that. I'll take a deep breath and have a go at an intro tomorrow. I identified the source of the phrase London over the border, and showed that the boundary is contested in the footnote. I've clarified the diaspora section, and will justify the statements by reference to the Victoria History articles on West Ham and East Ham. Hopefully, I'll struggle to a justification without substantially changing the outcome of the previous discussions. Then move onto to standardising the references, probably section by section.
Yes, I received the confirmation e-mail on 2012-09-11 with username (= my e-mail-address) and password. Uuuh, it was 09/11 ...
this user is such a worthless goddamn faggot fuck you faggot
Btw whatever decision an adminstration wish to take. He should remember that this block is too harsh given that it is his first violation since he joined wikipedia. -
the episode list to keep the episode list above the references.
over the next ~30 hours or so
The total population(10 millions) does not match with the e sum of the referenced populationsbelow in the infoboxImages in Infobox
MATT HARDY IS SO FUCKY!!!''Italic text[[Media:Example.ogg]]'''''MATT HARDY IS SO FUCKY!!!
"  I'm always on the ""Requests for page protection"" if I detect any missing/errant templates to see if the administrators can correct them.   "
When you say irrigiation structure, what exactly do you mean? I live on an irrigated block which uses overhead sprinkers, and I'm not far from the nearest channel. Thye all look the same throughout Sunraysia. I've got a little spare time now to grab some more shots, though I don't think I'll get out as far as Dareton. Got any requests?  \talk
"  == I wasnt really attacking him/her regarding the Lisa Williams article (Hmpzzz!) Do you know if Lisa can see dead people too? I have psychic powers too you know, i can see the future! Send all these ""Lisa Williams"" to Finland and they will all be locked in jails for being scam artists!"
" Yes. Quite persistent. I'm about to just create the article myself... Other new users are going to get lost in this discussion!  T/C "
North Eastern Region of Jharkhand    Wiki says North Eastern Region of Jharkhand is Angika region.  However, official language of theses districts of Jharkhand is not Angika but Hindi, Santali.  This is confusing.  So, it needs some clarification as to how come district of Jharkhand where the official language is Hindi, Santali could be Angika region.  Only those districts would be in Angika region where official language is Angika.   ````
Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 14:59, 16
I'm pretty sure the incident has already been included. And I know how to handle my own at riots, too. 8)
I'm afraid that's a broken link for me. -
" It isn't about success. It's a phenomenon that goes back at least 100 years, to the days of Sousa and Johann Strauss. However, if you look at the ""Article Milestones"" section above, you'll see it has survived no fewer than four deletion discussions. And we do require credible sources, and fancruft is removed on sight. andemu "
hate is my topic is hate if you hate a person means you like that person. Your hate can turn into your love
REDIRECT Talk:The Best of Apocalypse
" Just dropping by, I thought I'd leave a little feedback too. A featured picture is not always put on the main page, as noted by WP:POTD. For example, the semi-nude Michele Merkin was not used as it was found ""too cheesy"". Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Unused notes several pictures that were not used because they depict too much gore or are of a scatological nature. A featured picture rating is essentially indicating that the community feels that the image is of high quality and high encyclopedic value. On a side note, POTD seems to be up to .  Thanks for taking up the trace, Pink Oboe.   "
" I saw that reference, and I added a note (see note 10) by the name ""republic"".  "
and revert his edits
Message- Long time, no talk   I was just pottering around on Wiki, and suddenly I thought of you. So anyway, how ya going? I hope we can get along now.  Anyway, there is an issue that I have, that has to do with Wikipedia. A user on here had been stalking me and asking some innapprpriate questions. Do you have any ideas of what I could do. I know that user is also from Australia. Could the police here do any thing?  Cheers for now!  122.106.27.175
Be careful who you call a moron.
"   Leadbeater Biography   SmackBot problem  Rich-  Regarding the C.W.Leadbeater biography article,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Webster_Leadbeater, on 12 Dec ""Philosophus"" improperly reverted my extensive revision of Dec 9. I removed all the smears and slanders from the article yet he accuses me of having a NPOV problem. No editor has the right to revert the good faith contribution of another editor, I will undo his improper revert.  As you made a minor edit or two since then, your edits will probably be lost, also. Please communicate specifically what faults you find in the text and maybe we can work out some compromise wording, if you are knowledgeable in the subject.  If you are not knowledgeable you have no business editing this article.          "
Looks good to me. I think a nice pic of Midtown from across the East River would be the best possible addition to the montage, but there isn't one currently available on wiki commons.
Except for the fact that there's no information for the table, NO confirmation on number of episodes (why don't you just put 50 in?), so it's just clutter - and NOT vandalism. 220.245.146.235
I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF @
":Yes, I do hope to get it to GA status in the future. ) WP:MOSTV states that for fictional characters, their storylines should come first, and then the information on their creation and characterization. It makes more sense to read about what storylines the character has been involved in, before going into the production of it all. The same style is used for articles on books, films and television shows/episodes. '''16   "
Hi   Im a fucking bitch.  50.180.208.181
Support Lets protect and save this page from User:Balagonj786. This page has full of errors and invalid references.
Newsletter draft ready   Hi Dank,  I have prepared an initial draft of our drive wrap-up newsletter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/April 2012; if you could find the time to check it over before it goes out, that would be super. Thanks.
Oh ok, I just wanted to see what people thought. Anyway its up for CSD. Hey do you like my talk page? I hope you don't mind )    talk ER
Mark II subsec I removed the Mark IIx subsections and made them bulleted lists.  There was no reason, in my eyes, to subsec one line of information. //
"   Can there be a more concise listing?   The listing of ""other inventions"" is profoundly vague. Why group 4 different categories together? Why even mention things that the chinese received purely from outside sources? There should be a much more complete, well managed list of chinese developments, which I've yet to find- along with how these were transmitted globally, and whether or not places like Europe got them purely from the Chinese.  This really needs the attention of people with some remote expertise, which I guess is somewhat there when Needham's work, which is profoundly rare in private collections was cited- not like the arrogant bigoted ass who was crying about chinese nationalism, yet then went onto say that they only invented noodles.  And besides, why are things like the cannon and porcelain listed under ""other inventions""? Who developed these independently?"
Keep your chin up! Darwinism was not accepted over-night. There appears to be more sense in  the  AAT origins, than the sort-cut hypothesis that our  ancestors went from swinging in trees to the prairies (and then, eons later, take up a sedentary life style so they could edit Wikipedia and face book etc., all day). One only has to watch little kids on the beach.  The first time a wave throws them bottom-over-elbow they may well cry – but after a time,  they can't wait to get into the water again. It is as if  being at home on a sea-edge environment is hard-wired into their genes.  Unfortunately, the rise in sea level since these times means that evidence of these coastal communities may never be found.  Keep plugging away until the old hypothesis fade away.
The transcluded part of the GA review doesn't seem to update into the main talk page of the article correctly. May have to click to go to the subpage to get the most up-to-date version. Sorry, its looong. You can skim most of the content-related stuff, I guess.
Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus'   Hi,  Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article?  There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring.  Therefore I was wondering about your motivation.  Regards,
I don't care what you say here. I don't believe one sentence anymore.
If you would like to write an article of Bill's father, including his rise to CEO of Commonwealth Edison, feel free. This article is about Bill. We're not writing a chatty, book-lenth biography about him, but stating facts - same as other biographical articles in Wikipedia. The details of his father's career are irrelevant, although his (eventual) stature as CEO is not. This is yet another issue that has already been resolved.
" Vandalism is for e.g. this type of edit, somebody said that The Stig was leaving so I reverted it, basically I reverted it because there was no source to suggest that he was leaving, so I do know what vandalism is I just want to carry on editing Wiki, I love this place it's amazing please don't ""make me leave"", now that I've explained myself please please unblock me (  Thanks —123 "
I can tell you what the argument is about here newseventsguy. It's about YOUR retroactive reversion of a simple edit trying to include secondary independent verification of sedimentary nanodiamonds in Younger Dryas sediments by Bement and Madden et al., WITHOUT DISCUSSION a reference that I notice has NOT YET been included in the reference list still, after all this time. This is after you ADMIT that you are ignorant of the peer review literature and the controversy. Any attempt to do simple reference list edits on this page have been stomped by no less that five admittedly biased and ignorant editors. The honorable thing to do here would be to recuse yourself from editing the page, as I have. But I haven't seen that happening until now. Good luck with it, you've already made complete fools of yourselves.
" December 2015 (UTC)  Thanks. I have started working on Pranagnihotra Upanishad but I am unable to get the full text from the Deussen's Sixty Upanishads (pages 646-648 do not appear in the book under Google url}. Can you suggest a url which gives the full text? In the meanwhile I have completed this short article Sharabha Upanishad which you may like to see and add/edit. Nvvchar. 01:52, 3"
" Excellent! That would be great. The comments found at its peer review should also be very helpful, but I haven't had any time to actually act upon those suggestions. Cheers. —Hello! "
where's with pitchforks already?   17:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hi Fracophonie,  Thanks for taking the time to write such a long message - I appreciate this.  In terms of what I said about the age - I didn't mean to cause offense. I thought I read somewhere that you had to be over 18 to make these decisions but I think I was getting confused with the check user privileges.   I have already read some of those policies but will read the rest later today. I am not a troll - I just need time to get used to all these acronyms, policies etc.  From what started out with me writing an article about my favourite website has turned into a massive thing which was not what I was expecting.  I really don't have any more time to argue and debate with the usrs since its clear they just want it deleted despite what I have said. For example one user just wrote there is another site called Amirite.net. This is Amirite.com!! This is precisely why I had to keep responding on the AFC delete page.   In terms of the rest I agree to do them (of course I can only apologise once I am unblocked) - can you apologise for me?  On a side note I am actually French and Jewish (shame about the gay part though:)
"  It is unnecessairy source, because it does not matter how many soldiers were killed. What matters is that the Safavids were deposed. Besides that, mentioning that information WITHOUT making any remarks about the brutality of the Afghan forces - for example the complete massacre of the Safavid family (including women and children), as well as the massacres on the civilian population in Isfahan, Bam, and villages of Khorasan - is considered POV.   Besides that, you have not shown any sources for your claim that ""30000-100000 soldiers were killed"".   And as for the edits: it does not matter what YOU believe, it only matters what the Wikipedia rules are. You posted a message without editting ANYTHING ... that's the same as abusing the article's history as a message-board. Use the REAL message-board instead.  "
"  Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!   talk "
recaptcha   1 it isn't defamatory 2 it relates to a computer system not a living person  ReCAPTCHA forces users to solve the Captcha to access whatever the service in question is. Forced labor is the definition slave labor, i am going to revert your reversion, please do not do it again or i will report you for vandalism also please don't send me threatening messages tia 94.168.204.89
REDIRECT Talk:José Manuel Rojas
If you feel that I am acting in manor inconsistent with my responsibilities you can post something at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.  If you want to make changes to University of Wisconsin–Madison and you have reliable source references to support those changes then post the references with the changes.  This Tutorial may help with references. If you have more questions just ask.
All the sources needed are provided, all you need to do is read the article...but I guess you can't read.   Once again you prove you are not even reading the article. Every edit is backed up with the source it came from. I am NOT going to provide you with any details, because you are merely a civillain editor and not a Wikipedia staff member. You have all the info you need within the PIRA text edits. If a actual Wikipedia staff member wants more specifics I will be happy to provide them  Look, you are obviously a Anti-IRA hack who is making things up to support your bias. I am neither pro not anti IRA. I have no bias, I merely report facts. I will be checking this page daily, and will continue to submit my PIRA entry because it is by far the most accurate and factually supported. We can do this several times a day if you wish, or you can accept the fact that mine is the superior version and just deal with it. It's up to you, but I will re-edit on a regular basis. Or we can agree to incorporate your fatcxs and mine into one article.   But the three areas. The number of Loyalists killed from 1974 to 1998  The number of IRA victims as broken down by both Janes Intelligence online and the CFR.  and the IRA/RussianMafia connection which has been documented in multiple books and newspaper sources.  These three things are verifiable and will remain.
It's from one of the many books on various bands... I thought it was from Cult Rockers, but I just checked and Supertramp isn't in there.  I will seek out a source for this quote. -
When an article is created about that album then a disambiguation page will be created.
Blocking Mardyks   Guess what? Loser! Know what a cockblocker is? Hahahaha ~M~ 71.39.183.86
Wikipedia administrators are defending a mass-murdering psychopath.
request for help =   request for help   Hi again Cat,   as perviously I have noticed a strong anti-Greek bias on several articles related to Macedonia. I've had issues with both Furper and Beam... who seem to be admins that heavily favour FYROM. I've officially complained on the notice board about their threats to block, edit behavior and unusually close relationships with obvious FYROM POV members of Wikipedia.  (specifically Balkanfever)   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#This_anon_.28apparently_User:Crossthets.29.2C_is_an_apparent_POV_Pusher.2C_evidence_below  As I said verbatim on Politis talk_page...  This is a difficult battle because so far I am alone at the moment, I am a newbie, and as I said to one of the admins on notice board... I feel like someone reporting a bad cop at a policeman's ball.  However, I still plan to follow up soon with a precise listing of what I perceive as non-NPOV behavior by these admins. I noticed while researching this issue you've also have problems with them. Would it be possible to list any problems on your talk page here so I can add them to my report to show I am not alone? Furthermore... since you have been around longer you probably know more Greeks than me around here. Would it be possible to also contact them to ask them if they've also had problems with those two... and (if so) add those incidents to your list?  (and perhaps get them to contact others?)   Where one person could be bullied with threats of blocking... the concerns of many will be taken much more seriously. I will check back here in a couple of days. Have courage. Regards 209.161.238.86
"   Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheongye Kwan   Your post at the above AFD on a new martial art bothers me. This was the version at the time, that you based your post on. You posted:   ""I just read the article, and to be quite honest, feel that it does satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines... it is reliably sourced... Since I believe the notability of the article is satisfied... It now has 11 independent sources. And to refute the argument posed by Wayne, it is determined by the Phillip Rhee source that the martial arts is not localised"".  Please consider the concerns this post raises. Simple matters like references, notability and noobie basics of AFDs should be routine for any moderately experienced user, and bread-and-butter for any admin. In fact a cursory check shows that almost everything you stated was.. I don't have a word for it. ""Unreal"" is close.  The ""eleven independent sources"" that you stated established notability and non-localization at the time, were:  Three references from 2004 [coates, robinson, shaw], certainly before the topic even existed (!) and all related to a passing piece of news about its founder being on the team of a completely different sport in any event (!)  Two references from 1st half 2005 [davies, white], almost certainly identical and identically irrelevant to the topic's notability.  The promoter's personal page on his local town website, almost certainly self-published [official village website].  A 2008 casual interview in a non-notable and possibly non-reliable university magazine (apparently) of the promoter's travels to see experts in a different sport, with tangential tiny (< 1 sentence) mention that he'd discussed his new sport with them too. [ the Lau Philip ""LA"" interview].  3 entries marked ""Reference and support of , Written Reference"" [chris, cook, rhee], obviously a request by the founder to a friend/colleague write a letter of support, that was never published anyway and isn't cited so you can't have read it (not that it was even possibly valid evidence).  A short writeup of a ""local information"" kind, on the award of the first 4 black belts by the school, in its local paper.  In brief of the 11:  5 were before the sport existed and were not even remotely to do with the topic itself much less ""sourced"" material on it or ""substantial"" coverage (they had precisely zero coverage);   3 were claims of personal ""I think  is a great guy"" letters of support, evidently solicited and/or written on request, with zero evidence of verifiable existence, and certainly in no way reliably sourced or independent;   1 was self-written  1 was the briefest of non-mentions in a non-reliable source (pretty much ""I discussed the topic with them"" in a college magazine interview)  1 is local press coverage of his courses that's not even ""news for a day""  or evidence of anything beyond ""a course by this name is taught twice weekly in our local village hall"".  Your assessment of these, at AFD, was:  It is reliably sourced {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" |   There is barely one reliable source in all of those 11 that the sport even exists in the first place (!) - a local newspaper mention that it meets in a village hall on tuesdays and fridays and just awarded its first 4 black belts. Probably via self-promotional input.   There is zero reliable sourcing for any of the rest. |}  That the cited pages are evidence of notability {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" |   They don't mention it, or even date from a time the topic existed, nor are online versions provided! How on earth could they ""reliably evidence"" it? |}  That the ""11 sources"" are ""independent"" {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" |   3 are claims that ""please support me"" letters exist; they are even stated to be ""personal references""; unpublished and uncited  1 is his own clearly self-written web page on a local village web host |}  That the cites show it is ""non-localized"" {| style=""border:#c0c0c0 solid 1px"" width=""90%"" |   The page doesn't list a link so you can't have checked the cite, yet you say the citation ""proves"" it.   The reference openly stated ""Cambridge University and Bristol Taekwando"" (!) a big indication of its actual source  When a link was provided on request  it turns out it'
I believe that I have obeyed the communities rules. I do understand the rules about personal attacks. But it appeares to me that they are being applied unjustly in this instance. I have provided countless hours of academic research and input for Wikipedia. Please assume good faith on the part of the blocking admin! I am an intelligent adult. I naturally assume good faith until other parties demonstrate they don't. It seems to me this is a one-side affair.
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) "
A few things to get straight...   Firstly, I do not like you. You look like a smug little prick to me. Secondly, I do not like your ethnicity. Not one little bit. I'd like you to explain yourself on that count. Thirdly, your dog is a bit of a bender.   94.1.96.85
"  Please do not accuse members of vandalism. I do not mind if you change the word unique to prominent or remove stories of dreams etc. but you have vandalised the page and made a statement biased by saying that Dr. Qadri ""only"" sent out a referendum so I reverted the whole edit. You have also reciently vandalised the page by removing the names of the Yemeni scholars who recieved Dr. Qadri's Ijaza including the pictures and this is a clear form of vandalism so before accusing other members of vandalism do not vandalise the page yourself. What I did was clearly not vandalism as I only reverted your edit and any changes you made and brought the page back to its previous form. So would you first kindly read the rules of wikipedia and find out the definition of vandalism before accusing experienced users. You are still new to wikipedia I'm afraid and you need to learn how it works and the different rules of wikipedia before making any further edits.   "
Simpsons movie poster  Did you create the Simpsons movie poster image or did you source it from somewhere else?
I did not intend to be disruptive, I was genuineley upset by the word constantly. I only tried to make it look like an april fool joke after you explanation made me look like an uptight weirdo
Shamash is Sun   I agree to merge Sammash in to Shamash, since Shamash is more likely to be correct. Tracking the root of the word, clearly it is of Assyrian origin, in addition, it is a common vocabulary morph to substitute “Sh” to “S” and thus, nowadays, it is spelled as Shams in Modern Arabic.
Hello Setanta, can I ask you what you think of the proposal first put forward by Matt Lewis in July at Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland. I confess I am no expert on N.Ireland, but I believe this could solve the problem of N.Ireland having no flag to represent it on wiki. I have made a comment at that article. Cheers.
The real problem is the sneering and contemptuous attitude that you reveal in your first sentence in the last post. (It was originally followed by others in similar vein, which you have deleted.) Yes. I can cut and paste quotations. I can also select appropriate ones, in this case one which you would do well to consider. I will return to this when I have time, probably this weekend.
" He does appear to be a bit of a fantasist. To be fair, he has carved a nice little career for himself and more fool the mugs that buy his books and believe what he says. But, like many people contributing to this page, I come from that background and whenever his name is mentioned the response is always ""Dave who?"" No-one had ever heard of him at all until the books started coming out. "
dar   Ok, bear with me. Penelopism is a religion. It's a new religion. But it is a religion. Penelopism is extrememly important to Penelopists. We want the word about us out there. People are not too fond of our beliefs. We just want a way to show them that we mean no harm. Now, you have the Spaghetti Monster Church in here. That is not even a real religion. Penelopism is. So please. Tell me what the Spaghetti Monster has done that Penelopism hasn't. What can we do so that Penelopism can be on wikipedia? Because I am having trouble understanding. And I apologize for the 'dar dar dar.' However much fun it was, I shouldn't have done it.  whatsit.
I intended this to go the page:
by those pushing an anti-MRM POV.
Tried to be productive (look at my contributions) but hit my head against a wall of spoiled greek children (or probably under pay from Greek Government) that purposely keep vandalizing the Albania related pages and keep iritating the albanian editors until they explode and get banned. As a historian I blush with what I find quoted as reliable information on the wikipedia pages and the quality  of the editors and sources. Time to move to the French pages (a lot of readers there), still 5 more languages to go. Till next time.Wikipedia sucks! .
Thanks   for fixing this.
. I vote for Christ Pantocrator, though it could be nice with a wider crop
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
"   Gift cards for downloads  Re: ""As of December 28, 2007 it is not possible to use gift cards to purchase MP3s even though the gift card FAQ claims ""Yes, Amazon.com gift cards can be used to buy Amazon MP3 and Unbox downloads"" "" - strictly speaking, this is a false statement as were able to pay for orders with a gift card at that time.  One person already removed that line but it was reverted.  Is there a good way to go about providing verification?    "
" My experiences came up on the talk page but once I understood Wikipedia I didn't post anything on the article related to my personal experiences. That was like the 2nd day almost two months ago.  All of my references are verifiable.There's nothing in the article about my law suit or my being put in jail for engaging in pro se litigation.  I didn't put my experiences in the Judge Edward Nottingham article either although he was my judge.  I went out of my way to search for references expressing all the various sides of the issue. For instance, I wrote to the ABA and asked for their input, and in fact, asked them to work on the article. I also posted about issues involved with mediation and settlement with pro ses, citing references from a lawyers point of view.  Those references were deleted by someone, I can't remember who and don't know why. At this point, the only reference that I posted that is soft at all is a blog quoting a transcript quoting a former federal judge and I know for sure that is a valid transcript.  The guy who runs the blog is a 3rd year law student and has a business selling data services exclusively to lawyers.   Even the stuff that was deleted about pro se frustration I had references for. I read in the Wikipedia discussion of sources that blogs can be used in some contexts.  I don't believe that I did any original research. All I did is search the Internet for references for the article.  I really didn't know about unbundled attorney services or the amount of pro se litigation before I started working on this article. I had already been thinking about forms based filing but I started thinking about that anyway because of my experiences with ECF, which date back to 2004.  Also, when I was younger I worked as a systems analyst.  I did get the info on the Laws and Liberties of MA years ago, but Wikipedia already had an article on that and it probably would have come up anyway.  Same as the U.N. covenantcan't really hide that.   I didn't add a and b together to prove a point, at least not consciously. Like today, I was reviewing appellate procedures and it seemed that the 5th Circuit had a more pro se friendly tone, which I think is because of Judge Learned Hand, who was in the fifth circuit. And the only reason I know about that is that one time I went in every federal circuit and searched on the words ""pro se"" in the 40s because I was trying to see if there was a history of putting pro ses in jail for being pro se (No, there was not).  What I found in the 40s was that some circuits denied all the pro se appeals without even saying why but Judge Learned Hand seemed pro se friendly.  I believe that your posting things about pro se litigants getting an unfair advantage is ""soap boxing"". I do understand your wanting to win thru competition though and about law as a business. I've been an entrepreneur.   I didn't know about the Federal Judicial Center until I started working on this article. That book on appellate procedure I found looking for references for this article. The manual on complex litigation I found looking for references for this article.  Arguing with you helps me to clarify the issues for myself.  One thing I started thinking about a lot in the past few weeks is slavery and how that affected the history of pro se litigation. I ordered the book Slave Nation at the library but I haven't got it yet. But now when I look at pro se law in the different states I think free state, slave state, border state. Also, there were issues related to Indians in some of the western states. The labor union movement had a lot to do with it too, I think. So did the history of workmen's comp, which is of course related to unions.  "
Referring to her as *Catherine*   I was told in no uncertain terms that I could NOT refer to anyone, living or dead, by their 1st names on WP, & if a female had a title, she had to be referred to as that throughout her article - ie, *Lady Amy* or *Lady Dudley* for Amy Robsart, even though *Lady Amy* was wrong before she was married as she was the daughter of a knight & had no title, & wrong after Northumberland was attainted & all his children lost their styles as offspring of an earl & a duke, & she did not become *Lady Dudley* until Elizabeth I knighted Robert Dudley near the end of Amy's life nor was she then *Lady Amy Dudley* as legally she was no longer the wife of the son of an earl & duke.  I thought it was simpler to refer to her as just *Amy* throughout rather than explain the changes that occurred with her name & styles, but was told it was against WP *rules* (though I wasn't pointed to a link for it).  Noblewomen are usually called by their 1st names round here as far as I can see, even when they have surnames & are not *of* something!  Mary Boleyn is called *Mary*, not *Lady Carey* or *Lady Stafford*, Catherine Neville is called *Catherine* & not *the Duchess of Norfolk*, etc, & they're not royals.    As for males, I was told they had to be referred to by their title - ie, *Leicester* -  or last name - ie, *Dudley*.  I was banging head on keyboard going, but - no one just says *the king* all the time or refers to them as *Plantagenet* or keeps changing their titles - ie, Henry of Bolingbroke going from Earl of Derby to Duke of Hereford to Duke of Lancaster to King of England -    So how does Kate get to be consistently referred to as *Catherine* throughout the article, without her title appended?  I've only been here a few months & I would appreciate it if someone could actually explain this to me, as my main interest is British history & I am quite confused.
.  Mevins31 says:  I will be changing your elegant profile shot of Bruce to a better picture as soon as I upload it. I appreciate ordinary Jay Bruce fans, but I am Jay's biggest fan. Thanks for your attention. I think Jay would agree that a picture on Wikipedia has little to do with furthering his career, but nice try
Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. Please do not make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.
History   KalliKids was created by Karen Bach in March 2012.
Just shut up and stay shut. Don't edit anymore
Thank you for experimenting with  Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.   '''''''''' (talk/contrb.)
Im flattered, I truly am, I've been here a couple of weeks and you consider me to be an established user. Please don't talk about me behind my back like little school children.
I think it depends on the circumstances, if someone won a gold medal at a competition the Gibraltar anthem would be appropriate, rather than 'God save the Queen'
"   I TAKE OFFENSE!   I take great offense that some pompous, sanctimonious twit thinks that no one should be allowed to express appreciation for women like the Gibson Girl as the ""fine-featured"" and ""achingly beautiful"" creatures that they are.    I don't know what kind of totalitarian feminazi dystopian agenda you are trying to foist on people, but don't do it here!  This encyclopedia is based on free speech and a free exchange of information, not bogus political correctness and schoolmarmish thought-policing.  I'll take a Gibson Girl over you anyday!"
The are problems with the sfc t record. There are no credible sci challenges to it. This new section is absurdly US-centered, it cannot possibly stand as it it. This is the *global* record we're talking about. You need some credible scientific papers, not pictures of stations. As far as I know, the sfcstations stuff has merely documented problems with some station sitings and maintenance, etc. There is not even the beginning of an attempt at quantifying what influence, plus or minus, this might have on the record. If you're interested, there are papers about the effects of switching from north-wall screens to stevenson screens; thatched huts in africa; etc etc
If we do win, and get these evil people out of the government (and their private forces as well), then perhaps there won't be any nuclear blasts across the US and Europe.   btw, if MONGO is really with HS, why is he on wikipedia?
That is true with the first edit, however the second one was an honest mistake.
They seem to be reliable enough for this topic anyways - it's not like many major news sources are going to be covering the things that these sites cover. 63.164.47.227
"  In response to your feedback  Yoa can not do it by yourself, see Wikipedia:Changing username.       "
Davkal, I agree with you, but would suggest that you don't discuss it or gloat because you know he will likely come back and start harassing agagin. Apparently just a few hours after he left someone bit his head off on his talk page about a comment he left in an article. -
"   Thanks   Thanks for the tip Buddy.  walkie-talkie    KY highway page   I'm currently cleaning up the page. Please do not edit it. Thanks.  Let's Go Mets - Stats    Your first barnstar!   {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" |  |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |- |style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" | I hereby award BigrTex the tireless contributor barnstar due to his outstanding amount of high quality edits. Hikaru "
Messages on talk pages during an AfD  Placing messages on Users talk pages such as  and  in the hope of gaining support is an unacceptable practice which, agin, hinders the AfD process.
Thanks   User talk:Biggity... are there any constructive edits? Indef block, perhaps? Mahalo.
MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11   tharkarn and what waste man!
Some day, you and I are going to remember this and laugh!!! HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Never forget: I have incredible power. I am more powerful than you can possibly imagine.  Let me just close(?) this conversation by bidding you a fond farewell. ♥
"   Bloc voting   Countries with large populations of non-nationals may have their televote influenced considerably. This has been cited as the reason for apparent bloc voting in the Balkan countries of the former Yugoslavia.[91]   This is full-blown crazy. What does ""non-nationals"" mean? These countries have similar cultures and speak the same languages. The stars in Croatia are popular in Serbia and vice versa. People are nationals of their countries in the largest proportion in each of those countries (there are some refugees in each of those countries, but that doesn't really explain why Croatia would always give the highest no. .of pts to Serbia, or Macedonia to Serbia, where there was no conflict to speak of). For example, I'm a Bosnian Serb and me voting for a Croatian or a Serbian song is not unusual. But I'm not a Bosnian non-national. I have the passport of BiH, and my family has never lived in Serbia in history. It's really about mutual intelligibility  which is why Scandinavian bloc votes for each other all the time. It's the language and sensibility."
Email   Thanks for your email about the message you received from Guyovski. I received a similar, though not openly threatening, email from Guyovski as well.
I've removed it. It contributes NOTHING to the article.
"you are totally wrong the synonyms or terms of ""Kshatriya"" and ""Andhra Kshatriya"" was and is used for only ""Rajus"" but not other castes of Andhra Pradesh acording to Anthropological Survey of India by Kumar Suresh Singh which can be seen above and also in his other books.Because ""Rajus"" are kshatriyas and also called as ""Rachavaru"" in telugu in Medeival Period.Thats why Krishna Rao used the word ""Rachavaru"" and also he is not an ordinary man,B.V.Krishna Rao belongs to Andhra Historical Research society.According to Kumar Suresh Singh they are Kshatriyas who migrated from north india but not locals which is also supported by other anthropologers as the truth  is Aryans initially entered into Indian  Sub-continent and stayed in north india & north-east and then their castes i.e. Brahmins,Kshatriyas & Vaishyas gradully migrated and settled to south india.    No,"
"  That did not help. I don’t have an inkling what you are attempting to communicate to me. This is how the word is pronounced: inǧilizíyya. Or you can use IPA. Your new system with letters like ɩȋɑë is illegible to me. I don’t know what you mean by ""first edition"" or by ""ALFB"". I don’t know what you mean by ""long í is out of the ending"" or anything else that you said. Probably you can understand me much better than I you, so let us simply say that the word is inǧilizíyya.   "
You have left me no choice. Wikipedia is a group of fellow editors. You will be banned according to your actions, not your status.
"  Orphaned non-free image (Image:KSV Hessen Kassel.png)  Thanks for uploading Image:KSV Hessen Kassel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).  If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   Orphaned non-free image (Image:Darmstadt98.png)  Thanks for uploading Image:Darmstadt98.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).  If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   Orphaned non-free image (Image:Eintrachtbraunschweig.png)  Thanks for uploading Image:Eintrachtbraunschweig.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).  If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   Orphaned non-free image (Image:Karlsruher SC.png)  Thanks for uploading Image:Karlsruher SC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You m
Very Nice Work with Aristotle Onassis   Nice to meet you. Very nice work with Onassis. Thanks too much.
REDIRECT Talk:Carlos Johnson (musician)
This is super trivial, more a clarification. I chopped out the explicit mention of the BBC and dequoted, since it would be clear from the reference, in order to perform a minor space-saver. Either way, the 'weasel words' are still present, only now quoted and the source cited in the text. Is that standard in Wikipedia, as your edit comment suggested, when weasels 'cannot' be avoided? Best etc. ~
"|1=129.234.157.91|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by """". The reason given for Tango's block is: ""Personal attacks or harassment"".|3=Coren|4=1310028"
Whoever put a notices on my page. I will kill u
" ""circular"" as well as the counter arguments. Defending S-C is risen to the level of religion. It's not only circular, it's vertigo. 78.0.128.72  "
"  Thanks )  • You Da One "
Latin America also includes Brazil, that had an diferent social system then that of Hispanic America.The title of this section is wrong.
William L. Walsh   Hello Lemurbaby. There has been no recent improvements to the William L. Walsh article for GA status.  Possibly this article needs to be withdrawn from the Good Article nominations page, unless, recommendations have been addressed.
This is futile as  I mentioned. There are multiple sources confirming Ali's apostasy from Islam. Can you demonstrate that Warraq is not trustworthy?  (talk•contribs)
"  Issues Onefortyone, the reason why I removed your edits, because they have following problems:-  It is Graceland that is 2nd most visited place in the USA., , ,  Not Biltmore Estate. ""The décor throughout the house has often been criticized"" is incorrect, it has not been criticized by anyone. Then you put up the quotes of Albert Goldman, a fringe theorist on Elvis Presley, and added them under Graceland#Basement, which is irrelevant. Those ""conflicting reports"" about his death have no relevance on this article, especially when they are disputed or rejected enough times.  This is why this kind of content misleads and should be removed. I don't see any consensus for adding it on archives or previous discussion either.   "
Cavorting with Heretics   Fuck Heretics!!!
People, we are desperately in need of some consensus here. Can we all please vote for one of the following options. Given that there are three options, I think a 51% plurality would suffice. Some of the options have subordinate polls: please vote again in each of these subpolls
}} {{WikiProject New Zealand  |class=C  |importance=low  |politics=yes  |politics-importance=low
Back atcha  And thanks to you too!  Cheers,  (talk)
"  Yup.  I wonder as well.  I also hope that soon the coroner's report is released, and ""all hell breaks loose,"" so we can all finally get to work on fixing this thing with some reliable information.  Just me.  Your mileage may vary.    "
Foto   Foto states: Carpatho-Rusyn sub-groups - Transcarpathian Rusyns in original goral folk-costumes from Maramureş. Photo: Village Mokre near Sanok (Poland). 2007. But why do they wear trousers sharovary of Ukranian Cossack??
The multitude of sources simply cannot be ignored. There are several articles stating the environmental impact. I will actually expand the section in the article because the monument is so big, people should know as a part of an encyclopedia the river bed violations. I would disagree with the arguments given above and that the edit should have more expansion within the article as a half dozen citations stating there are environmental issues. Also there is a persistent  conflict of interest from the users above but from their follow-ups, there intentions will be clear.
What do you mean? I think we should stick to what sources say. Have more sources been uncovered which portray the subject as anything other than a criminal? Or have the rules changed so that BLPs should no longer reflect what sources say?
"   Context of ""In the beginning""?   The article starts in media res. What was ""the Truman Committee"". At the very least a link?   "
" He has voluntarily accepted a 5-month self-imposed ban on editing political topics, and has been unblocked. I'm okay with that, and have told him so.   |  Talk "
"  Sorry, I consulted you before I did anything else. Then I noticed you'd posted to the second debate, so I left a note there. No, I'm afraid the closing reason is not beside the point. I am going to reverse you, but do feel free to re-close it as a ""no consensus"" if you wish. Closing on a technicality, when some people are arguing for deletion is simply going to frustrate people and lead to a needless second debate on DRV and AfD. You do not close a debate on the ground of the nominators wishes, unless no one else is suggesting delete.  "
"   Why ""Commonwealth"" instead of ""Dominion?""   Based upon comparing the governments of the Dominion of Canada and the Commonwealth of Australia, I don't really understand the differences.  The idea of a Commonwealth seems to compare directly with that of a Republic, so if the Queen of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the Queen of Australia, how can one style Australia a Commonwealth?  Would it not be a Dominion as is the case for Canada?  And would not the States of Australia likewise be provinces?  I honestly don't understand the differences between each of these and if someone could explain them to me, it would be greatly appreciated.   2 July 2005 03:19 (UTC)"
05 / 8: – 08:17, 12 August
"   Hello   Hi Blu Aardvark, glad to see you did not permanently leave Wikipedia.  I was wondering why my Template:Current event template redirect wasn't working, couldn't see the obvious! )  — (talk) 2006-01-15 13:36Z   Thanks   Thanks for taking note of The Arcata Eye and Plazoid pages.   Happy Birthday!   Have a great day )   (talk)   Admin Fighter That was really funny, gave me a good chuckle. You should have just crossed it out and left it in.  (Talk)    ""Removing religious and political categories. Recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth.""   Were you referring to this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Catholic Alliance of Wikipedia-like vote stacking?  (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉)   No. I was referring to a Wikipedia email I recieved earlier today, sent by  now.     policy proposal   Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:  Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5      Ubuntu Logo   Blu,  I noticed you changed the logo for the Ubuntu Linux User Box.  Why?  The usage policy on Ubuntu's offical site clearly allows for such use. Besides, the logo is just that, a low-resolution image of a logo, which is allowed under fair use.  I am aware that some discussion has been going around about ""fair use"" images in user boxes. If you changed the logo to Tux because I labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information, I'm sure I can find an appropriate image copyright tag.   At the time I had changed it, several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace, per Wikipedia policy. The Ubuntu trademark policy may allow it, but Wikipedia policy (per WP:FU is to limit images that are not available for commercial use - which the Ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows.  | (talk) | (contribs)  The preceding text was copied from User talk:Jcarroll  WP:NPA  Please review and adhere to WP:NPA, WP:CIV, and WP:WQT. Please re(?)-familliarize yourself with Wikipedia policy. Thanks in advance.   I am fully aware of the above policies, thank you. I do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack, or incivil, to call a troll a troll. I'm sorry if you don't agree with me in that - but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies.  | (talk) | (contribs)  It is a violation, and you must refrain from it. WP:NPA is non-negotiable.   Funny. Nobody considers it a violation of WP:NPA to call User:Willy on Wheels a vandal. Nobody con
Bleh. I'm all out of ideas. Is there really something wrong with the server or what? The damn thing won't work for me, either Helvetica_font_new.svg (my upload of Segoe UI was actually a PNG to begin with...)
does fall under wikipedias NOR policy
Homosexual marriage is totally gay  Well it is!  12.204.164.179
banging your head against a wall   Hi, I see JayJG has been leaving messages on your page, with his false concern about the rules and supposed reasonableness.  In reality, JayJG is a rabid Zionist and is trying to purge Wikipedia of any negative information about Zionism, and is trying to paint Muslims in a bad light.  Along with many of his cohorts.  The problem is that JayJG is part of the Wikipedia cabal.  When there were elections, despite massive efforts to the contrary, a number of people got a higher vote percentage than JayJG - but Jimbo Wales put him on ArbCom anyhow.  Jimbo has shown his true colors as well.  These people control Wikipedia.  They are all together, and attacking you.  No one is coming to your aid.  This is because they control Wikipedia, with Jimbo at the center, and have more or less driven off everyone else.  You are banging your head against a wall here - any massacre by Zionists against Palestinians will be covered up, disorted, justified etc., anyone who attacks an Israeli soldier will be castigated here.  My suggestion is to direct your efforts to somewhere more creative, like a wiki encyclopedia that is not pro-Zionist and anti-Muslim like this one.  Or if you do continue here for a little bit, to spend less time.  It is better to waste 5 hours of time accomplishing nothing than 10.  Eventually you will give up here, everyone does.  You are fighting a losing battle.
She has said that Madonna is a major influence.
Is it still a stub?
Overrated   Derek Jeter is overrated, i don't like him at all, he shouldn't be making 20 mill a year for having average seasons
Er...he's me!  Please feel free to check out my user page
Fuck you both, I'm not interested in what either of you think. ,
This game is teh awesome
SHUT UP, YOU FAT POOP, OR I WILL KICK YOUR ASS!!!
"  What ""links/content"" on what page?  "
"  How did you decide that bukkake always implies a female subject?   Also, just because a word has a historical meaning doesn't mean that it can't ever mean anything else as culture develops. The word rap meant ""to knock, as on a door"" up until the late 70s for example. Would you deny the more modern use of the term? The English language has no board to regulate it, as French does with the L'Académie française, so you have no basis for defining what the word means. We have groups and documents that define the proper use of words like ""you're"" and ""your"", for example, but none such for words like bukkake. If it can be shown that it is used in a particular way, that is valid. My personal belief is that there is no need for the qualifier ""gay"", just as there is no need to call men having anal sex ""gay anal sex"", but that's really irrelevent.   I think it is important to make clear the historical implications, but not to deny that we are currently creating and modifying language. Even the fact that we have taken the word bukkake, ""splash"", from Japan and created this very specific connotation of splashing not just anything, but specifically semen and specifically onto a person's face shows that this term is elastic and subject not to rules that we impose on it, but by the meaning that it has to the people who use it.     "
I hope others are around (
"==Recent Vandalism== Look at the page history for the guy that keeps writing ""!!!!!!!!!!LINKIN PARK RULZ!!!!!!!!!!"" He's changed the first section to that repeatedly, no matter how many times we reverted it.   "
The only vandals are pathetic wiki administrators as encyclopediadramatica.com says right!
Regarding edits made during December 2 2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bendigo South East Secondary College page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers.
So far, I have these sources that I will use for William Kaye Estes's and his contribution to education.   Bush, R. R., & Estes, W. K. (1959). Studies in mathematical learning theory (Vol. 3). Stanford University Press.    dainaloo
"  No!  This is a GROUP EFFORT!  Wikipedia is a collaborative COMMUNITY and there are no school essays here.  The article needs to be more professional and adopt a better title besides the references.  This is all that needs to be done, so get off your high horse and accomplish what you want to see done.  If you have these goals, then put yourself to the test of solving this problem.  That's what I do whenever something perturbs me.  You're just looking for a fight about something you admittedly care nothing about.  How about I come by your house and criticise your gardens?  ""Why?"" You say.  ""Because they are too fucking ugly and I don't like the way they  don't blend in with the neighbours' yards.  So tacky, but I'm only passing by and I've never been down this road before.""   15:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)"
KISS MY DICK   ...ALL 3 OF YOU
"   RopeMarks bondage picture   Your recent move from Bondage (BDSM) to Bondage (sexual) has caused the image link to the picture of a female bondage model I took at BoundCon 2008 to break. The reason is that, because of frequent vandalism, this image was added to MediaWiki:Bad image list, where it was set that it can only be shown at Bondage (BDSM), Rope bondage and BoundCon. Your recent move requires a change to this list, but I'm not sure how to go about to request such a change.  | Talk "
"   Upcoming album, Screaming Bloody Murder   This seems legit. The catalog number seems real. See , found after I did a Google search using the catalog number from the Allmusic listing of the album. meh "
Too many parentheses.   It sounds to personal with all those parentheses. Can someone please clean that up?
"  The source clearly says or criticise it in any way. So where is the misunderstanding, I think it cannot be read in more then one way? According to the quote, general criticism of Soviet Union will become illegal. And I must say that I find this to be a truly sad day for Russia, when that happens.   "
.  If one did leave out carbon atoms then that would not be correct. Example, what would methamphetamine be if you left out a carbon atom?  What are left out are hydrogen atoms and they should be, since it has been previously pointed out, they would unduly clutter the diagram and are unnescesary as being implyed anyway
what businessis your one someone elses page. i do recall you and fconway have done this before , so once again it is ok for you to do but no one else., also will you refrain from being a vandal on the martin anderson page. thank you.  anynmous
OK I got you the first time.
I'm fed up with all this and the people here. The community here is dying and now I will now indefinitely and probably forever take my place amongst those who have also withdrawn from this project on similar principles, it is nothing but needless stress and over-consumption of time
":The term ""Soviet Empire"" is an informal term of criticism. It is not a precise term, it is not meant to refer to a specific period in Soviet history with a clear beginning and end. It refers to Soviet actions during the Cold War in general.     "
28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
MDY dates in CentOS article   Hello there!  I've just  the date formatting edits, re-establishing MDY dates in CentOS article so, please allow me to explain it a bit further.  Manual of Style does say that existing date formats should be kept as-is, but before I came to edit that article, ISO dates prevailed and I've changed them to DMY dates.  Thus, I see no problems about moving this time to MDY dates, which, FWIW, I find to be much more readable.  Of course, I'm more than open to discussing this further. —  (talk | contribs)
" Please look at the original in page 197 of this link in case my copying made stupid jokes.  Let's talk  "
There is no evidence that this block has anything to do with sock accounts. My use of my accounts was completely legitimate. And contrary to what Rodhullandemu is trying to imply, the only accounts that I used in the police talk page are mr3003nights and this one (which is a completely legitimate practice). I was blocked for a discussion in the talk page of the article on the policenot for editing the actual article. Please read that discussion I linked to and see it for yourself that it was pure unjustified retaliation for offering evidence Rodhullandemu could not answer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Police#Why_reiterate_.22reduce_civil_disorder.22_instead_of_protection_of_property.3F 69.228.251.134
You should certainly contact your local police and file a report. Make sure to show documentation demonstration the lack of response from the WMF. Their lack of response may be criminally negligent in some jurisdictions. 134.241.58.253
"  It doesn't matter if they call them ""English"" in the scources you provided, the British are commonly called ""English"" but the term is incorrect because after 1707 it was the Kingdom of Great Britain. If this were a WWI article and you replaced German with Prussian that would be about the same thing you are doing now. Not all scources are correct and it is unencyclopedic to call the British ""English"" as there are also Scots, Welsh, Cornish, and Irish people in Great Britian and calling them all ""English"" is not correct and ""English"" needs to be changed to British. If hope a British user backs me up on this because what I am saying is 100% right and the vandalism warning I gave you is justified so please do not call it a personal attack as it is not. If I called you an insulting name or gave you a useless warning then it would be a ""Personal attack"", but since it is not I would appreciate you would stop vandalising the page by replacing the correct term of British with the incorrect term ""English"". User:Daniel Chiswick 13:00, 7 May 2007"
}} T/C   If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Demonte Morton   U bastard stop deletin' my shit u white trash cracker muthafucker. Fuck u u racist bitch. I hope u die.
Bla bla bla....suck it Irishguy =)
Ahh, I am glad to say that I have worked out the problem, and have now added three images (,  & ) to commons, and their articles on wikipedia. Thanks again for the assistance Nick.
Esports categories   Can I ask why you moved Category:Electronic sports games to Category:Esports games.  The general conventions listed on WP:CATNAME say to avoid abbreviations and that topic categories names should correspond to their articles, in this case Electronic sports.
AND ON TOP OF THAT  eh, you're not worth it.
"   What the hell do u mean   cough* *cough* excuse me, who the hell are you accusing of ""disruptive editing"".  I was the individual who actually wrote the bulk of the article on Rajbeer Singh.  You gave YOU the right to come and simply delete my all my writing???  If you wish to contribute links, go ahead.  But who the hell gave you the permission to simply delete all the writing that I had spent time and effort doing?  Carry on deleting my work and I will carry on undoing yours.....With pleasure........"
The first THREE were rejected out of hand and the following half a dozen where similarly ditched. I could produce ANOTHER fukkin half a dozen but it that wouldn't matter to a pure PoS paid scumbag would it?
I understand quite well how evolution is supposed to work.  I understand the capriciousness and contingencies in the workings of evolution.   It is the paragraph in question, especially the example in that paragraph, which distorts the workings of evolution.  The phrase “it need only increase at a rate of 0.005 cm per generation (= 50 cm/10,000)” easily gives the impression of progressive linear change.  The anthropocentric notions of directionality and purpose often (I assume inadvertently) find their way into the writings of specialists who attempt to explain various forms of Darwinian evolution.  From these I have often read how evolution “invents” various forms and functions.  Carl Sagan, in my opinion one of the worst offenders in these matters, injected anthropocentric notions on a massive scale so as to justify his idea of a million highly advanced technological civilizations in the Galaxy.  I read your paragraph as suffering from the same notions of directionality.
" Sorry for the late reply; if you are willing to say how this works (or direct me to a tutorial of some sort), that would be helpful, but I will by no means demand it. I just noticed you and one other user were creating the images, and wanted to take part in some way. I won't be able to do anything until tomorrow afternoon (CDT), though. Thank you for taking the time to respond.  (talk) "
": Er, no, that's not how it works.  We do not filter our edits to this or any other article through individual editors.  If you do not like an edit, it is your prerogative to do something about it.      ... speak! ...    "
No silly it isnt ITS UR MOMS and might I say quite the lovely page indeed.  Oh and UR MEAN no im just kiddding but ur not all that nice either...cause u have a black black heart.=(
And by the way, please take a look at the wiki on Alex Haley, who seems to be your source.
Pulp Fiction   Would you recommend it?
June 2006 (UTC)  Ermm...I actually designed and built the shopfront, are you really telling me what I was thinking when I did it? Hiding the crack was the ORIGINAL reason, not the ONLY reason. Another thing, the shopfront only 'juts out' by 6 inches in a couple places and is mainly set back from the building line by up to 4 feet! This creates the impression that it hangs out over the pavement. I will dig out a picture of the shopfront from the side if it will make you happy. Chris Ostwald, 21:40, 6
Some that we know would claim that as OR, but I won't. As I said, if you want GB maybe find a source that says it?
"== Nazi PUNKS not Nazi Skinheads... ==  To those of you who wish to contribute to this article, please refrain from entering in information pertaining to Skinheads. The point of this article is to show the difference between Nazi punks and Nazi skinheads and to show that Nazi punks exist within the punk subculture. These are two different subcultures and though people often mistakenly call racist skinheads ""Nazi punks"" they aren't the same thing at all.  "
70.146.212.249   Oh, don't tell me... (talk)
Ed, have you ever shown this kind of interest in any subject which did not directly relate to one of your pet peeves, such as criticism of the Unification Church, things you perceive as sexual immorality or legitimate science dismissing crank ideas? 76.105.223.232
Undo   Good job undoing and not discussing on the talk page! - [talk]
We own the project so how the heck is it Unambiguous copyright infringement????? And it wasnt written in a promotional way, it just explained the project and the system requirments! I'm starting to see why so many people hate wikipedia...
"   Beyond the Call of Duty     The Camouflage Cup For making World War II ship camouflage measures of the United States Navy‎ into such a splendid, accurate and informative article. I hope you will go on to create many more Camouflage articles.   "
There was a bad redirect that dumped all talk onto the wrong page...
"I think the information given in Wikipedia about the languages ​​spoken in the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is manipulated, only reports the official language of the SADR and languages ​​spoken ""native"", why? languages ​​spoken ""native"" because they simply reported ""languages ​​spoken"" as if reported in the Wikipedia page of Western Sahara: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara. I really believe that you are using this formula ""spoken native language"" not to include the Spanish language as spoken in the SADR. who will believe that a country has Spanish as second administrative language, and no one speaks the language, even as a foreign language, I do believe that the page of the SADR in Wikipedia is manipulated and politicized, by editors Moroccan and expansionist Anglo deluded think that the lack of a second language vacuum administrative SADR, will favor the English language occupies that place, to the 2 I say that you are wasting your time, like it or not the Spanish language and will be the second administrative language of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, today and tomorow.    "
((By the way, you can just use my Wikipedia userpage to get my email address))
Sure, we can do that. You can go ahead and edit the article Swedish, French, Italian women. I think it is more of a regional thing that everybody around Georgia thinks that Georgian women are pretty. I don;t think that statement makes that much of a differece or requires that much of a discussion. I am sure we can cite it using on of the travel guides to Georgia.
Circumcision advocacy   Jake, you've twice reverted on Circumcision advocacy without offering the slightest bit of explanation.  Some people might consider this to be intentional edit-warring, but I'm going to assume good faith and instead politely remind you that edit comments are very important and that reverting without a stated reason is not considered to be a good practice.  For now, I'm going to undo your changes again, but if you have a good reason, all you have to do is explain it.  Thanks!
Italian Renaissance as a featured article ==  Before getting to the substance of my comment, let me just thank you for all the work you've done for Wikipedia; users like you are such an asset to the project. I do have one minor critique to make, though... I noticed that you promoted Italian Renaissance to featured status, but at the time, I had an actionable (and in my view appropriate) objection. (Candidate page, with my comments) I objected to elevation to featured status on the grounds that there are stylistic issues in the article, missing commas, etc. I went through the first half, but haven't had time to fix the second half. At any rate, you probably just didn't see my objection; I'll do more to address it myself, but the style isn't up to par for our (rightly) high standards for featured articles.  talk   ==
July 2012 (UTC)  He appears to have resumed editing with anonymous IPs almost immediately after your block.  I've opened an SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noormohammed satya so that others can start tracking and blocking the socks as well. —  12:27, 8
"  Not sure. The Roman army was made up of many ""disposable"" armies of mercenary and only the legions were true Roman decendents. I'm pretty sure military service was mandatory in order to remain in the Roman Empire. I see you are right about religious persecution. I must have been misinformed. Before an ethnic group could enter Roman boundaries to serve under Rome for their protection.  "
It's obviously one of the people credited as providing voices for the game, however it'll be hard to determine which one.
"   Let's have a beer to celebrate!     Thanks for reviewing United States v. Kagama, a newly promoted featured article.  Boomer!  "
Or I could simply change the caption so that it reads'a drain in Sydney being explored. The graffiti is there because it is there. It just happens to be in the photo
It appears that you two obviously should get along well together!.
I think I understand your position now. And that would certainly be effective at eliminating false credentials claims. However, it also would eliminate a great many true credentials claims, and the underlying premise of the proposal is that true claims are beneficial. You may disagree with that premise, but that's a different discussion. I would like to find a way to verify pseudonymous claims, while still generally preserving privacy. I do think that's possible within reason, although probably not in an absolutely fraud-proof way. As you point out in your opening contribution, the verifiers must be trusted since not just anyone could recheck (otherwise it wouldn't be preserve privacy). That's the main design challenge remaining, in my view. Derex
Warnings?   Hey there is someone else on this IP. They are vandalizing. What do I do? -66.51.147.57
SOCK PUPPETRY? IS USING ANY ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER CONSIDERED SOCK PUPPETRY? This site is a complete joke. I can't even edit using a *verifiable* account without being accused of violating some concocted offense. My address was censored because I was using an account which was apparently improperly named, so I am now using one that IS properly named (AFTER the probation period) and that in and of itself is apparently an offense. Logically, what is going on is that I am being unable to contribute in any way whatsoever because I am being repeatedly punished for a first offense spawned from ignorance. What kind of site are you people trying to run here?!   It's no wonder the main founder of wikipedia turned his back on it when it's become such a blatant travesty of the intellectual honesty it purports to espouse. I have continuously been censored for editing a biased article- an article which is continuously edited by self-avowed marxists and anti-zionists (the very same people whose POV the article unashamedly puts forward). What kind of encyclopedia has articles that put forward opinion verified by echo chamber sources? If any editor attempted to put that sort of trash in Britannica they would be quickly disassociated with the publication- but it's quite apparent that Wikipedia has no controls whatsoever and has chosen to let the patients run the asylum. There is no use in attempting to run an objective and educational publication when the very people who have discredited the internet as a source of information are allowed to manipulate the site by sourcing the same intellectually dishonest sites that people use wikipedia to avoid.   In short, explain yourselves- particularly Roland Rance, who has manipulated his position on this site to censor any points he disagrees with- all without explaining why. When you stop accepting the ridiculous assumption that senior members are beyond reproach, perhaps the site will gain some semblance of credibility. As it stands, wikipedia is just another example persistence winning over intelligence.
I was not talking about monetary fine, I meant vandalism results in blocking. I thought that according to wikipedia if well sourced info is removed for ideological reason constitutes as vandalism. I am still of the opinion, that information should be allowed freely and not be censored. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not the promotion page of Mirza's followers.
"   December 2008   You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.   talk "
ZEST  Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST Thanks for your help !!!!
help   Pls help me on the Hasan Sami Bolak article. User Kibele and her puppets are trying to make the article deleted as they did after a long political campaign in the Turkish wikipedia. You have enough language skills in English to tell people the facts better than me. Pls tell about their lynch campaign that they want to carry into English wikipedia. Thank you. 212.156.67.30
Aaron Swartz   Stop fucking reverting my goddamn edits!!! I think Aaron Swartz is a dumb-ass, and he should have been killed a long time ago.  I know where you live; I WILL KILL YOU IF YOU REVERT ANY MORE PAGES!!!!!
AFD Just thought you should know Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters (2nd nomination).
, tending to take its cue from it once it's been establish there,
"   trunkarchive.com   Hi, Daniel.  I noticed you blocked User:Trunkarchive.  I suspect this user's activities formed part of a concerted promotional effort on the part of trunkarchive.com, a media-licensing company, to create bio articles on as many of the photographers in their stable as possible.  Here are the other accounts, neither currently active, who may have been involved:       Photofan76's contributions consist almost entirely of creating articles about photographers represented by trunkarchive.com.  Several were deleted (see User talk:PhotoFan76), but a good many have survived. Perhaps some  are speediable G11 or A7.  Those that are not I could conceivably bulk-nominate to AfD  with the exception of any that meet WP:CREATIVE.  Even those that remain should probably have the ELs to trunkarchive.com removed under WP:ELNO 5: ""Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services""  I've also added trunkarchive.com to the list of proposed additions at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist  Does this seem like a reasonable course of action?   "
"  Let's see if I can answer in an orderly fashion:  Lead   The point is that it was very much his own style, his trade mark.  Looking at the sentence now, it makes perfect sense. Please do. )  I agree. That sentence was not ""hatched"" it was ""contrived"". Will think about it, suggestions welcome!  Why not? I was just afraid that the article would be ""top heavy"" with a longer lead. I'll just put it in my notes for tomorrow, it's too late for me to think right now.  General   Learned something new here. Thanks! )  Please do. I've ""gone blind"" on the article for the moment...  Early life   My usual errors, not combining words. Please correct. )   Thanks! -Talk "
hello sir yunshi, sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion...
Hi, 牛岩, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:  Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article  Simplified Manual of Style  Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.  However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's  signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.  Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.  ترجمة | թարգմանություն | tərcümə | пераклад | অনুবাদ | превод | 翻译 | თარგმანი | μετάφραση | અનુવાદ | תרגום | अनुवाद | 翻訳 | ಅನುವಾದ | បកប្រែ | 번역 | ການແປພາສາ | превод | भाषांतर करणे] | ترجمه | перевод | превод | மொழிபெயர்ப்பு | అనువాద | การแปล | переклад | dịch |  | יבערזעצונג
Google search predominantly shows the mixed martial arts over the football player.
Arji, what makes you think this assertion is mistaken? It is not my assertion, it is the conclusion of this agencies report, taken to be reputable enough to be run by several respectable news carriers around the world. Naming me a troll is a classy touch, and calling for all dialogue with me to cease should be grounds for your indef banning from wikipedia.  The fact that you and Kim don't believe the conclusions does not matter, the evidence passes WP:V and WP:RS. The evidence has been released to the media and no-one of repute (That's not you Kim BTW) has challenged the validity or accuracy of the study. The fact that the study doesn't include Chinas massive underground coal mine fires only helps the conclusions of the report.
":::::::Understood. And just wondering, why is this section called RfA? I am far from having enough experience to become an admin, nor do I have any wish to become one currently. Triple M   "
" (UTC) It's common use is not as a proper noun. The dictionary article referenced in this article talks about the dispute between horse breeders, and ""people who are not in the horse-breeding business"". Wikipedia is not an encyclopaedia for horse breeders. It is for the public.  23:51, 6 June 2010"
Licensing issues In 2007, you created Malaysian Federal Roads System by copying from at least one other Wikipedia article. Where did it come from? If the source article is not identified, we can't use the text. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material in public domain, but retain the right to credit for their contributions.  (talk)
"  Friend, no problem with me. But just look at the discussion page and history of edits when ""suspicious"" persons are added. Croats or Serbs will claim he wasn't Bosniak but Croat or Serb, Bosniaks will denie and so on. But I'm glad you proposed Tvrtko, I'm considering to later add total number of votes, so we will see.fuchs "
" The subject of the ongoing attempts by politically biased Wikipedia editors to suppress any mention of Neil deGrasse Tyson's embarrassment has prompted widespread derision from the political right. ""[B]logs and conservative opinion pieces"" may not be reliable for statements of fact (see [WP:BIAS]), but if they are well-known, high-traffic, non-fringe, etc. they (National Review, Volokh Conspiracy, Weekly Standard. etc., etc.) ABSOLUTELY establish the existence of a controversy. Partisan dismissals of the significance of the controversy from the other side of the political spectrum subtract nothing from that fact.   "
As far as I know there were no warrants of arrest for Thomas Jefferson from the British Crown.  There is nothing in the writings of Thomas Jefferson that states he was committing treason and could be hung.  Jefferson, Washingtion, and Adams, according to Ferling (2000) believed they were slaves to the British government, not having any rights.  They did not view themselves as outlaw rebels, rather, they wanted to be free to make their own laws that protected white people.  Franklin apparently is the only Founding Father who mentioned being hung. Was Jefferson in the room at the time Franklin made this statement?
That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found.  The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry.  I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report.  Everything is available for inspection and comment.  Talk
i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section  i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency.  Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2]  and this is the original one Managua, Nicaragua  epicenter of crime in Nicaragua  experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s   40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent  nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency  Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua  now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly  currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members   concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership   territorially based in specific neighbourhoods  defend territory as a source of identity and pride    Lower class barrio in Managua  Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms  responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity  commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua   violence and gang warfare prevalent  robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in drug trade among other criminal activities and here is the link http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm
"  Addressing: While ""Indian tribe"" is official US Gov't lingo, saying ""tribe"" twice in the first sentence and then again in the second is awkward, also ""the tribe"" is not a monolithic entity, but rather a collection of people - so maybe reword to say something like ""The Coeur d'Alene people once inhabited 3,500,000 acres (1,400,000 ha) in northern Idaho and Washington,[2][3] (And Montana, actually, note article on the tribe) but today, the only land controlled by the tribal nation is the Coeur d'Alene Reservation in Benewah and Kootenai counties, Idaho.[4]"" You don't have to use my wording, but you see how I am distinguishing land and people, though the two are, of course, closely intertwined.   .  Boomer!   Second and third paragraphs jump around and need another copyedit. I'd put right up front that Johnson did the executive order but Congress never acted on it, then go on about how the tribe didn't accept it anyway?  Keep the chronology clearer.   (Interesting that the Coeur d'Alene article says nothing about this period, maybe finish here and add a bit to that article too... hmmm)  From a VERY cursory review of the decision, it appears that gap between creation of the reservation and Idaho's statehood becomes significant in this case, so perhaps give us a bit of foreshadowing that this is not just a dry fact, but it's something that's going to matter.   The section fails to draw out the significance of the info on the state park and mining, maybe add a wee bit to hint at why this will matter in the SCOTUS case."
The answer to that question has finally been found; Justin Timberlake is one of the artists that does that song; Gap Band nephew Snoop Dogg interpolates lyrics from Early in the Morning in the 2005 song Signs.
"   Pseudonymous editing   copied from an email received offline Hi,  I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous.""  Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures.  And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link.  Thanks, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz bathory@bathory.org bathory@maltedmedia.com  Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear.  Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name.  I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken).  Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently.  All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself.    That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym.  It is not independently verified against some external identity database.  And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia.  We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials.  By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs.  That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system.  Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you.  That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia.  When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit.  Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia.  But those are all manual checks.  There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it.  Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address.  The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted.  Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority.  And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit.  Most people are honest.  But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not.  That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing.  Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security.  The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours.  How can a bank know that you're really you?  And how far can that trust be extended?  Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable?  How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible.  Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate.    Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now.  Thanks for your message.  To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia.  The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top.  That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols.  You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages.  You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~).  When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp.  Again, welcome to Wikipedia.   (talk) "
well, change it then.
" I really didn't expect it to ""fly."" Thanks for the affirmation.  "
Barek, why are you abu$ing the deletion function?   You ju$t deleted a bunch of edit$ and page-move log$ that do not meet the criteria for deletion. I $uggest you rever$e your deletion$, or you will be de-$y$opped.
Clearly a partisan gesture. I'll discuss this further when I am able to edit freely. —aco
"   Copyright problems with Image:Siaeconomy.jpg    An image that you uploaded, Image:Siaeconomy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  2  "
Trivia section/everthing else you butchered: Not the place for it   Then where does it belong then!?
ISP's  My ISP is randomly assigned so unless you ban the whole of my ISP provider I can just register again so I'll do what JFW does and act in cyberspace as I please.
REDIRECT Talk:List of Lyon Metro stations
, and just because some band or swear word appeals to your apparently juvenile sensibilities does not make it noteworthy enough to warrant inclusion on this site
" I don't attribute motive; rather, I note behavior.  You have yet again shown up at an article which SlimVirgin regularly edits and started editing there, within minutes of her last edit.  You were warned quite clearly to stop doing this; with any luck, a 24 hour block will help enforce the importance of this. (talk) "
Thanks. Happy New Year to you too. I probably need some help with the citations. I keep on using:  TITLE OF ARTICLE HERE [link here]
F.Y. punk, VidGmr was my homie. It's was due to some faggot named Klptyzm.
"   Romanians   Hi. In the Romanians article there is a section titled ""Contributions to humanity"". I have no problem with the content it's just the title sounds kind of POV. Do you have any idea for a re-wording? Alex  "
Um, sure ECW initials mean something, but they don't mean hardcore wrestling, and least not entirely.  Does the name Chris Benoit, Rey Mysterio Jr, Dean Malenko, Eddie Guerrerro, Chris Jericho.... I could go on and on and on mean anything to ya?  ECW was more then hardcore wrestling, it was the innovator of everything we see on TV today.  Not taking away anything from XPW, because it was great.  But it was almost EXCLUSIVELY hardcore garbage wrestling.  ECW wasn't.
After eight years of editing, you bet I've read WP:Disambiguation ) Now, have you read it? In particular, you might want to look at the set index articles section ) Danilovsky District is a set index, and as categorized as such. Cheers,— • (yo?); October 2, 2012; 02:01 (UTC)
mediation   I know we haven't exactly departed on good terms (but hey it's been like 2 years ago and I'm over it), but you seem the most rational on that side of the camp. So apparently, Ksyrie and co. think I'm censoring Chinese views when I clearly purposed that they can move the shit they want to the background section. I just want that retarded section out of there. It's redundant when the section above it talks about the same thing. Now they haven't responded to me at all in the talk page (this have been going on for months mind you) and I can't report them for 3rr so I'd appreciate it if you would look into this. I think you being 'one of them' and a admin will help. Thanks.
Finally stop your edit wars and your crusade! If there is censorship, then it is done by you as you removed correct information.
I agree with you, corollary is the word to be used in english. (Lina.lasse)
]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.
REDIRECT Talk:The Bear (1998 film)
Hapsford Please cite sources for this article.  Otherwise, it may be tagged as a candidate for deletion in the near future. Cheers. ++
No, you are the racist, you goddamn neo-Nazi    YOU BIG BOY
The previous proposal was closed on 16 February.  Today is 23 February. We're repeating what was said there. Let's close and hat. We can revisit this in a year.
REDIRECT Talk:Gare de Lyon rail accident
"  The article is not just about the incident with the two guys, that for some reason didn't wanted to talk to the police. The name of the article is - if you didn't notice it - the ""2005 Paris riots"". It's about the riots and it's relevant to mention that previously there has also been other incidents of religious/political unrest/violence in that specific area.   "
Manufacturer/AKA   PrinceGloria, please go read the Infobox conventions. The Vibe's Manufacturer is Pontiac, not the NUMMI plant. Also, no one ever agreed that the Matrix/Vibe were related. Please read this discussion again. You are the only person who contended that the Matrix and Vibe were related and not AKA.
"   Smile album re-recording vocals- how much?   It doesn't say for sure in the article, and I'm not necessarily saying it should say in the article, but does anyone know how much re-recording of the lead and background vocals were done for the songs on Brian Wilson Presents SMiLe album?  I'm looking for this info and not finding it.  Did he re-record all the vocals or did he use some of the originals recorded by the Beach Boys in the 60s?  Specifically on the songs ""Good Vibrations"" or ""Heroes and Villians"".  Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks.   "
This is absolutely false.  I cannot believe what's going on.  First I make an edit that obviously conforms to Wikipedia standards and is a helpful contribution, and it gets edit-warred down by 2 or 3 people who don't care about what belongs on Wikipedia.  And now you make ridiculous false accusations of sock-puppetry because someone else agrees with my edit which was obviously right in the first place?!  I certainly need an admin to reconsider what's going on - maybe I need to appeal this.
Scope Please see the link above, as I'm sure you are a fucking spastic
Move?   Should cuisine in the title name be capitalized? It's capitalized at the beginning of the article. If so, may I move the article? -
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours due to vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
Gabriel Fahrenheit   I would like this page to be unprotected and returned to the state where me and IntimateCarbon have aggred to a compromise.  02:10, 27 Oct 2003 (UTC)
" Your response required in achieving consensus Hi please respond here > Talk:Assassinations_and_murders_attributed_to_the_LTTE#Consensus_to_redirect Talk "
Firefox   I still can't quite figure out what the history and even current situation with that is. As of 2012 appeared to default to Direct2D, but not to DirectWrite .
I found a better reference. In ,page 24,   Theoretically, polygamy can assume any one of three possible forms: polygyny or the marriage of one man to two or more wives at a time, polyandry or the coexistent union of one woman with two or more men, and group marriage or a marital union embracing at once several men and several women.  Of these, only the first is common.  And on page 25   A statistical analysis of Kaingang genealogies for a period of 100 years showed that 8 per cent of all recorded unions were group marriages, as compared with 14 per cent for polyandrous, 18 per cent for polygynous, and 60 per cent for monogamous unions.  The disadvantage of working at a medical school is that the anthropology texts are not extensive, but they aren't checked out often either. This had been sitting on the shelf for over 20 years, deep in the recesses of the basement. Murdock is a sufficient reference for polygamy including group marriage.
"  Why again are you making off-topic interjections? I did not delete it, I moved it and even gave it its own heading. Your comment was not at all about a new name and even then not at all persuasive, and even non sequitur as I quite clearly pointed out above - but even my own comment was off topic, so I moved this as well! You're making much of someone else's quite calculated ado about nothing. Even this should be moved to a topic of its own - but with your permission this time if it would cover all bases. This was a constructive discussion.  "
. This illustrates the difference between an encyclopedic and an unencyclopedic fact.
, 26 October 2015 (UTC)  RESPONSE: I contribute entry with reference to COMELEC Official Publication. I have no conflict of Interest with COMELEC.  John Petalcorin No, but you do have a conflict by editing an election article while participating in the election.  As stated below, Wikipedia is not for electioneering.   19:49
No need, as abstracts are intended for non-experts. This particular abstract is very clear. Thanks for the offer though (not for your misinterpretation of the paper).
Thanks for the info about double redirects.  Kind of new to them.  I'm up at 1:07 AM contributing to wikipedia, man this is crazy.
- This was done in an effort to correct the lies that chinamanjoe has been spreading through this site
Citation #4.   Why is that even there? The article has nothing to do with Alien Nation what so ever.
"::Well, I hope you (or someone else) get it working again, as I think it's a very useful tool.  Thanks for writing it, and I look forward to any updates. -  ♫♦♫   "
"  I don't disagree, but there ideally should be a description of the band's style (elsewhere in the lead?).  🍁 ¡gobble! "
UK Release Date   In the most recent issue of the Official Nintendo Magazine it states on an advert for a particular company that the game will be released on the 30th May.  Would I need to maybe scan this page and send it to someone for proof??
" 2007 (UTC) Well, see first if anyone at the page is question objects to unlocking - without bias towards future editorial decisions. D 14:21, 23 July"
Danville Thanks for letting me know about the fixes to the Danville page.  I'm embarrassed that I didn't pick up on that elementary flim-flam move with the town's url.  There was another long-running attempt to override the town's page several months earlier; it's nice to have additional people keeping an eye out.
Latest CIDESCO article deleted as blatant copy vio.  If you really want to write this article, please write it yourself and find some reliable external sources to use.
It's in spanish but it's the truth, If you don't cite this you are acting like the fraken gatekeeper know it all, you aren't shit.
"  Hmmm. I was actually writing a response as you sent yours. Oh well. For the record, my response was this:  Resurrecting articles is frowned upon, yes. We might be able to get away with it if the article we resurrect is a substantial improvement on the last one, however - though of course we both know that there's no guarantee it would ultimately be accepted whatever we did - there is an established bias towards deleting articles on individual matches. Changing the name would be nice but I'm not sure what we would change to...the game didn't really have a ""name"" like the Ballet on Ice or any such, and there are limited other ways of naming the article.  Making this subpage was a decent idea, you just got unlucky in that it's something that has already been tried elsewhere and ultimately voted against. Honestly I can say I've never seen a subpage for an actual mainspace article so I have no idea how much people tend to chase these articles up or whether it might just glean a community-wide shrugging of the shoulders. Certainly there's been no AfD nomination yet, which is a start. I have to say I somewhat favour making it a standalone article or merging with the season article (i.e. not keeping the subpage) but I don't have strong feelings so I'll run with whatever works. If it got categorised it would either be put into a category for something like Category:Football matches (I have no idea if that exists, it was another example) and Category:FA Cup and then probably into a new category for City matches or comebacks or somesuch where it probably would be on its own. That category would then have to be categorised so it wasn't just an orphan. I don't know what the ethic is here for creating categories with only a single article in them but I suspect it's not encouraged, so that idea might be rejected if (whoever did it) couldn't find more like-minded articles to categorise into the same. I don't think it being categorised would really affect anyone's opinion of the article though. The one thing that might affect peoples' judgement right now is that it will (in its present form) show up in categories as ""2003–04 Manchester City F.C. season/Spurs 3-4 City"" or however the subpage is actually named, given the / in the name.  Yes, I'd say it will currently be located in an overarching ""please categorise these pages"" category. I don't know how long it would take for it to get sorted, but it would probably be put somewhere generic. Better to do it ourselves, I guess.  Sorry my thoughts were a bit disjointed but I was answering the points as they came and...well, better English just didn't quite flow from my fingers as I typed. Hopefully I addressed all your points. I'll settle for just keeping the subpage if you want it, though I think that page would be best served by being redone - with as many citations as possible - and expanded upon, so we can argue a case for it being reincluded into society, so to speak. Having an article AfD'ed isn't a permanent sign that that article should never exist, it's merely a suggestion that it shouldn't exist in the state it's in. Generally speaking most articles that get deleted will be kept the second time around if their quality and/or level of detail is substantially improved.  As for the Charity Shield, I always considered it a notable trophy. Yes, it's a single game, but it requires winning a trophy to qualify in the first place (ignoring those early years when some teams refused to play). To this end, I'd consider it more of an accomplishment than winning the trophy which qualified you for it. Similarly, would you question the worthiness of the European Super Cup? In fact, because some teams initially didn't enter, City were instrumental in making the Charity Shield the respected competition it is today by taking their place in the competition twice. You could argue that of all the teams to have ever played in it, we should be the ones most ardently defending it.  Talk "
"  why don't you ""REMOVE"" my free speech you goddamned self, you whiny little pipsquak. That's all you seem to be good at doing."
September 17th vandalized   This date which was vandalized by 142.162.64.146  I know the one who did it was Kagome 77 as the IP traces to St John's Newfoundland.  As his/her Ip Address goes to the same location  his/her home address which i will not reveal.  I don't want to make this hard on you Kagome 77 but you left me no choice.  I've noticed many articles you vandalized and I'm sick of it.  Kagome 77 all I'm saying is grow up please stop acting like a child before you gets in worse trouble with the law.
Not really sure what the issue is here   What is The Name of the Rose? It is a book. Is it a fictional library? No, it is not. Is it a fictional librarian? No, it is not, for a real book cannot be a fictional anything. So stop bloody adding real things to categories for fictional things. Not that difficult, really.
"   A barnstar for you!     The Writer's Barnstar Thanks, Belovedfreak! I'm just learning how to send messages, so I'm sorry I took so long to reply to you. Have fun editing!    "
im new to this so I really don't know what im doing do anybody want to help??????????????
In case this helps I asked again at Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#Helping_going_away. Thanks. -
Kirsten Kemp  There is nothing wrong with the Kirsten Kemp edit to Saved by the Bell. Please quit reversing it.
POV forking I combined POV fork paragraphs in the article per WP:POVFORK.  I also organized redundant references for sake of not deleting them but they will need to be culled.  There's a lot of primary sources and original research in the citations that need to be removed.  The POV forks dealt with are: 1. Korean vs Japanese origin of TKD.  This POV fork existed in the opening of history section and the modern developments section. 2. Historical context behind Japanese ban of Korean MA.  POV fork existed in opening paragraph of modern development section and then again in the third paragraph.  The third paragraph also contained editor personal comments and ruminations which is considered original research WP:OR.
"At bat; Edit Warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Juan Encarnación, Terry Tiffee, Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, Matt Guerrier, etc.==  Please don't change ""At bat"" to ""at-bat"". ""At-bat"" just redirects right back to at bat anyway. -    I agree.    I agree because he is correct that it should not be hyphenated.    In addition, pls stop edit warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, etc.    And add to the list Matt Guerrier.  It is perfectly accurate and reasonable to reflect his won lost record.  There is no reason to delete it, other than your penchant for disruptive edits.  Kindly desist.    It has also been explained to you, with proper citations, that the plural of RBI is RBIs.  Pls stop edit warring this point.  See Juan Encarnación and Terry Tiffee.  That is vandalism.   Run batted in says: ""The term may be pluralized as either RBI or RBIs"". Obviously not vandalism then but a difference in opinion then. @Matt Guerrier, the reason it didn't show up was because a ""|"" was missing, and with your edit you re-removed it and duplicated info. It's amazing how you continue to assume bad faith, blindly reverting and editwarring over messages on his own talk page...  (t / c)   Danged if this little war isn't over some seriously picayune crap. Both sides are being a bit petty here, because really either set of edits is acceptable on these pages (well, except for the bolded Contract on Ian Kinsler  either make it a subhed or take it off, seriously).  Oh, and technically, the plural of RBI is RsBI, but that just looks clunky. In common usage, ""RBI"" is used for either singular ""Run Batted In"" or plural ""Runs Batted In"". ""RBIs"" is a bastardization used only because it's simpler from a usage standpoint.  Either way, I think everyone involved in this should chill out for a few days and just leave all these pages alone. -    Jackal4, again, is making a rash of these edits on every page I touch.  As to RBIs, as X96lee15 pointed out the most thorough treatment is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball/Archive_5#RBIs.  Plus, mlb.com is the official reporter of baseball, and uses the RBIs convention.  Yet, Jackal4's reaction to that is to go on pages where I have written it thus, to delete the s  as though the s is incorrect.  He has done the same with ""at bat""  which he insists must be hyphenated.  Etcetera .... these are just two of the types of reverts he feels impelled to make of my edits.  It is picayune, but it is wrong to revert perfectly good edits.  If he insisted on lower-casing RBIs, or any similar degradation, I would think it wrong of him to follow people around and revert perfectly good edits.  There is enough good work he could perform instead.     Well, I can't stop him from wasting time if that's what he wants to do ) .   As for ""thorough treatment"", I'm not sure I consider a bit to which a grand total of two people contributed particularly thorough. I respect Kingturtle, but I think he's got it wrong on this one. Regarding what mlb.com uses, you're appealing to the wrong authority, because it's not a terminology issue, it's a grammar issue.   In any case, at this point I have no doubt that these edits are being reverted simply because you're both watching for each other's names on your watchlists. Allow me to again encourage the both of you to just stay away from each other's edits entirely for a while and allow the bad feelings to ebb. At the rate you're going, you're both going to get blocked. -    Jargon overrides grammar. To say that a batter ""flied out"" is probably not good grammar either, but it's proper baseball terminology. I think this needs to be discussed at the project page, assuming anyone's watching that page anymore. [[User:Baseball
FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU
Thanks Alan  thanks for the intro to wiki, you dumb guido, but I think I can figure it out for myself, hotshot. get a real job.
== Oh, no, you needn't worry. Except for working crossword puzzles and using it as a highly questionable reference source, I am, I assure you, through with Wikipedia.
"   ""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp""   ""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp"".  I propose that we change the name of the page and make the appropriate chnges to the text.   "
Bob Parsons Thank you for experimenting with  Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
}|yes|The committee's decision is still in effect, and can be found in the [ page history].}} |}
"==On the Removal of the Redirect==  This page used to redirect to 19th Century Philosophy.  I'm not too familiar with the specifics of wikipedia's policies, but I think this redirect was misleading.  I also think this article probably deserves a page of its own.    The History of Western Philosophy has a decent section on ""modern philosophy.""  How to deal with this overlap, I don't know... but if modern philosophy is going to be a redirect, maybe it should go to History of Western Philosophy."
"  You were wrong and you know it.  I never was ""vandalising"" the page129.2.44.118  "
- unsigned comment
Your low self-esteem   I see you have such a low self-esteem that you have to warn others not to attack you.4.130.134.233
I guess you got a stalemate then? (  I actaully searched for Keediz on line and like you found nothing, But I have heard it used on TV loads of times. I really love children (In a legal way) and I hate adults treating them like idiots.  Never the less your threats have been taken into acount and as I'm not yet finished with this site, I will refrain from posting anything Keediz realated unless I can provide proof, and to be on the safe side I will ASK you before I do so. I hope we have a neutral understanding, but this doesn't remove my pain.
Bold text Italic text
"== May 2015 ==  Thank you for experimenting with  Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  "
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? STOP CRITIZING US!!! YOU'RE WRITING IN OPINION!! FUCK STOP THIS! MADDOX IS A PRICK
"   Kidnap (2015 film)   Please move Draft:Kidnap (2015 film) to Kidnap (2015 film) - Thanks.  «T ♦ C ♦ » "
why did u block me   ummm ya so why did u block me
Mereger?   Please explain why you merged an article which was deleted into this article? Most of it is OR and has no place in an article whatsoever.
Velvet Sky   When are you guys gonna get her profile up and running
Ruskin Fellowship   Hi, as a recent change patroller I noticed an edit of yours to the Ruskin Fellowship article. I think that you are doing a great job, so I hope that you won't feel that I'm being overly critical if I say that I noticed your liberal use of capitalisation. I would encourage you to attempt to follow the guidelines for capitalisation in the manual of style. I know there is a lot in it to digest in one sitting. Hopefully, by making you aware that it exists, I will be helping you to learn a new skill.  Keep up the good work.
You've been warned before - please stop.  (t) 17:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
.When I am providing with reliable source where ganga lal gupta has clearly proof that kushwaha come under kshatriya varna. you mother fucker do you have blind eyes that you cant see it
"  He uses a song called ""Warm it Up Kane"" in the beginning by rapper Big Daddy Kane from his It's A Big Daddy Thing album."
It is a separate line from the street railway line that connected to Ramona Park in the same area.
I haven't inserted those.   Even I myself am against that.
You have just risen 1000% in my estimation.    202.142.129.66
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Philosophy *Talk:Aesthetic Realism. Should the article be permitted to include historical information that current teachers of the philosophy seek to deemphasize?
Toddst1, I understand your point, so I created my own
William S Saturn is a sockpuppet   Hey dickweed Saturn, remember me?  You dumb fat bitch
Umberto Colombo article Starting point for this article was the Umberto Colombo article at it.wikipedia.org->Google Translate->English speaker edits->small amount of additional info based on a few new sources were added.  Um, is there anything I need to do to be onside copyright-wise?
Handing out blocks using Twinkle. What a fucking disgrace. — lfdder
nonsense   are you a boy or a girl
Right now, I haven't done anything really wrong yet.  I made a quality edit, and stood by it when some power-hungry mod reverted it.  All the drama would have been prevented if DA had simply apologized, rather than just increasing my warning level. 76.119.75.131
I got a reply from Asmen. He will translate the text, but he told me that it might take little bit time because he is busy nowadays. Incubator:User:Maviulke12
Alright! Thanks. I see it moved over to the labs now. That's cool. I used to do a bunch by hand and it was really tedious, but this looks manageable.
"  Doctrine of the Holy Crown  Some wiki troll deleted the ""Doctrine of the Holy Crown"" article, which is a constitution like the Constitution of Sweden or the Constitution of the United Kingdom, and confused ot with the ""Holiness of the crown"" belief. It is a constitutional legal topic (similar to the British and Swedish article) and it is not about religious beliefs of the crown. Péease restore the independent ""Doctrine of the Holy Crown"" article."
"   European Borders   There is a BIG problem going on about whether Republic of Georgia and other neighboring countries should be included in Europe or not .As you know there is no official border between europe and Asia and there is a great number of unofficial versions .so you might think that it is LOGICAL to explain all of the versions that exist for today on that page..........      well sadly thats not what most editors think. they put one version there and every time I changed it, it went back to the previous version. now I am just wondering do these people think it is their personal page or what gives them the right to rely on several sources and ignore other ones that are not any less trust me. They should definately offer every version of where the border goes between the two continents instead of putting only one version  and not even bothering to explain why, it is unacceptable. I contacted one of the editors and he/she said that he chose that version because he/she ""thinks it is the most neutral one"". I am sorry but what some users ""think"" should be completely irrelevant while making an article on the website which has an ambition to be Credible. they should include all of the versions or not include anything at all before there is an OFFICIAL border ! Council of Europe, the oldest organization in europe classifies country as european,  country is in the middle of the NATO membership process (only european countries are eligible for it according  to the North Atlantic Treaty) and they are not even mentioning why they left it out. Turkey is not the case because it was already amember of nato. cant they understand that page is not about the EU. its the entire europe as a whole and until the borders will be determined OFFICIALLY all of the versions should be included. I really want to ask someone to take care of it as they dont seem to understand my very logical argument and even used some rude words in private messages.  "
To re-emphasize, this entire paragraph was extremely judgemental.  Even if you think all lawsuits should be barred, and victims (many who died as a result of asbestos) should be labeled 'shams', this is not appropriate for any encyclopedia.
I fully agree with recommending the image for deletion, especially in light of the dubious claims as to its authenticity.  While his hair does have some natural wave, it is nowhere near that long or curlyto say nothing of the clear differences in face shape, length, width, and symmetry. Some of the first image results on a Google search are T.R. with longer/wavy hair, and there is no resemblance to the individual in the picture being debated.  In terms of specific detailsyou've claimed this is a recent picture from T.R.'s breaka date that the picture was taken would be a good start.
"   More description of location please?   Hello, I wondered if someone with the requisite local knowledge would please consider adding a short sentence, maybe in the description section, to explain where this bridge is? I do appreciate that its location is already described in the lead as crossing between things X and Y but if you don't already know Stockton well (or recently!) this is not necessarily all that helpful. I was wondering if you could write a more bottom-up description which says something like ""the bridge crosses the Tees at blah (or near Blah Street etc); it is A hundred metres downstream from the Foo Bridge and B hundred metres upstream from the Bar Barrage"" or whatever, which it seems to me would nail it in more empirical terms. What do you think? Any yes, of course the maps link does nail it (assuming the co-ordinates are right!) but something in the text which helps in this way would, I think, be very useful. I may be being unusually thick  (happens all the time, actually) but on my first reading - and I was last in Stockton in 2007, you see - I was not at all sure where it was, wondering if in fact it replaced the other rather nice pedestrian bridge closer to the town centre. I cured this uncertainty by looking at the maps, yes, but the sentence I'm asking for would have given me more direct access to the knowledeg. Go on, please write it for me, you know you want to; and I will go and put the kettle on for you. Thanks and best wishes   "
JG55   wow thanxs for getting be and balz blocked maybe if u mine your own business and woundlnt talk to us were 10 years old and u are tlaking to us and we told u to stop so plz do thanx u
Automatic protection for Main Page? It would be straightforward to write a bot that (1) protected all images on the main page, adding Template:Mprotected, and (2) unprotected all images with Template:Mprotected that no longer appeared on the main page. Feature (2) would be genuinely useful and save editors work. However, if editors came to rely on feature (1) then that would introduce a risk, because there would always be a gap between an image appearing on the main page and the bot protecting it. A clever vandal could vandalize the image in that gap. And worse, the bot would end up protecting the vandalized version of the image. I suppose the bot could attempt to detect vandalism like that but you can see how complex the process could become.  08:13, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
''' Superscript text
"  Finally, I would not be referring to the article on ""alternate theories on the Plame affair"" if rewinn had not recommended moving material from this article to that article.  That article still has disputed neutrality, and I do not think that it is an article to recommend reading.NYScholar "
This it isn't a debate, its a discussion (see (WP:POLL]]).  You can likely find references that use both terms, that is the problem, and why gaining WP:consensus is exactly the right thing to do.  The purpose is to air out all sides under equal terms, and avoid edit wars and arguments.
"  Wishaw General Hospital A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wishaw General Hospital, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with .  "
Interaction Parameter, R0   Is there any reason the method for calculating the interaction parameter is not mentioned anywhere? It just seems to be introduced as some mythical concept rather than pointing out that it is determined through trial and error based on empirical evidence of what solvents dissolve the material.
This song was coverd by Paul Torrence, Tanner Viox, The Banjo sisters, and The super BEbop Boys featuring Al Gore.
RfC: Earlier it was reported that the name of the rape victim was said to be revealed as Jyoti Singh Pandey but later it was proven untrue. Can the unproven name be included in the article?   Earlier it was reported the name of the rape victim was revealed on the request of her father but later it was reported that the father never gave permission nor revealed the name. Should this unproven or false name be included in the article?
"  Not a problem. I would suggest you start by drafting up the article on your computer. Get some good text, some sources, and figure out what types of wikilinks you want to include. Also, you will want to mark it with {{stub}} if it's short. See WP:STUB for more details on making a good stub. Alternatively, you can create a subpage in your userspace such as  (C•T•) "
Are you kidding? Take your threats and shove em.
Thanks   Hi i'm italian user SoloTitano. Thanks for your work about Sanmarinese footballers and San Marino Calcio's players (i'm a fan of this team). Your work is great, and I hope to use your informations also on it.wiki. Infact I create articles about San Marino Calcio and Sanmarinese sportspeople =) You can also create a category about San Marino Calcio's players like it:Categoria:San Marino Calcio. Contact me for everything and if I can help you =) it:Utente:SoloTitano. Bye
Here's an example:http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/wolf-blitzer-shows-off-cnns-emmy-award/ That's the type of link that supports the claim.99.135.169.168
am i able to get a refund on my donation?
no fuckin make me fudge packer 'gwernol'[more like queerhole]
"  This article was nominated for deletion on December 6, 2005. The result of the discussion was redirect to Beauxbatons.  An archived record of this discussion can be found here."
What was classed as a severe adverse reaction? Just status epilepticus and psychosis? Is
Buying a lotto ticket doesn't count either, or does it?  I've presented a logical argument with a full half of the glyphs uncontested.  Perhaps this counts for something...
It is important as it was by the means of this contest that Colombian artists like Fernando Botero, were able to travel outside colombia and florish as well as to gain name recgnition in Colombia. ( )
, or any backbone to the administrators, you all  will toss out Gryffindor's farcical behavior.  You would think these German speakers could be fair, could live with compromise.  Then you see people saying that the current name was all a conspiracy.  Yes, of course.  Utterly pathetic.
G'day Fayssal   Hope you're good -) - I must also take this opportunity to let you know that almost every time I see your username around the place, I get that catchy 80s electro tune in my head - your very own soundtrack -)  What brought me here really though was your comment in the arbitration amendment thing that someone filed about 'my' case - it's all kind of a long time ago now, of course, but I did (and do) find the irony of  having run '' as a long term sock rather delicious - the fact that Guy ran these two accounts all came out ages ago too, if you're a curious wiki-historian (or have present concerns, I guess?) then let me know if diff.s would be handy, otherwise I just felt it was worth clarifying what I was on about -) cheers,
I have read Milton's book, and he mentions the work of Hoyle, Sheldrake, Reich etc
" The first thing I noticed was a random edit from an anon IP requesting help - , no idea what that was about, then I noticed it had been checked by someone and then someone else had placed the WHOIS template, which advertised my internet details and prompted a WHOIS search on me, advising that ""any vandalism from here should be reported.."" I thought this was inappropriate and not needed, because I am an established and respectable user. 94.192.38.247   "
The CityRail Station alt template is fine as it is. It doesn't need more changing - we've already had endless debate which resulted in the template that we have now, and I'm not interested in any more. I'd prefer you go and fix something that needs work on it, not something that doesn't.
"  I've changed the heading along the lines you suggested, to ""Criticisms of Michael Dorris"", which I hope tackles the question you raised.  Feel free to alter it further, of course!   "
ow! someone just blocked me! I don't think I can feel my ass!  YourCousin
Real Madrid Kit  But let me just say this, Real Madrid isnt the only ones that have excesive detail in the kits if your gonna change it might as well change the Barcelona one too
REDIRECT Talk:ShaneGujrat Newspaper Pakistan
has got some sand trapped in his vagina and it's making him a little bit cranky
blocked me accusing me for trolling. If he, you and others believe I’m a troll please keep blocking. If Hillary Clinton is a troll then I’m more than happy to be a troll too. If Hillary Clinton is not a troll then I’m not a troll too. If you believe I’m not a troll please first unblock and then block again for the right reasons. After that we would have a base for an evaluation based on the right accusations. Till then my defend line is what Hillary Clinton said “I would like to offer a historic perspective and not to compare Putin with Hitler”. Thanks.
"Contents of the library (objects and functions to be used outside, situation late August 2004)  Classes: Page: A MediaWiki page     __init__               Page(Site, Title) - the page with title Title on wikimedia site Site     title                  The name of the page, in a form suitable for an interwiki link     urlname                The name of the page, in a form suitable for a URL     titleWithoutNamespace  The name of the page, with the namespace part removed     section                The section of the page (the part of the name after '#')     sectionFreeTitle       The name without the section part     aslink                 The name of the page in the form Title or lang:Title     site                   The wiki this page is in     encoding               The encoding of the page     isAutoTitle            If the title is a well known, auto-translatable title     autoFormat             Returns (dictName, value), where value can be a year, date, etc.,                             and dictName is 'YearBC', 'December', etc.     isCategory             True if the page is a category, false otherwise     isImage                True if the page is an image, false otherwise      get (*)                The text of the page     exists (*)             True if the page actually exists, false otherwise     isRedirectPage (*)     True if the page is a redirect, false otherwise     isEmpty (*)            True if the page has 4 characters or less content, not                             counting interwiki and category links     botMayEdit (*)         True if bot is allowed to edit page     interwiki (*)          The interwiki links from the page (list of Pages)     categories (*)         The categories the page is in (list of Pages)     linkedPages (*)        The normal pages linked from the page (list of Pages)     imagelinks (*)         The pictures on the page (list of ImagePages)     templates (*)          All templates referenced on the page (list of strings)     getRedirectTarget (*)  The page the page redirects to     isDisambig (*)         True if the page is a disambiguation page     getReferences          List of pages linking to the page     namespace              The namespace in which the page is     permalink (*)          The url of the permalink of the current version     move                   Move the page to another title     put(newtext)           Saves the page     put_async(newtext)     Queues the page to be saved asynchronously     delete                 Deletes the page (requires being logged in)      (*)  This loads the page if it has not been loaded before; permalink might           even reload it if it has been loaded before  Site: a MediaWiki site     messages               There are new messages on the site     forceLogin()           Does not continue until the user has logged in to                             the site     getUrl()               Retrieve an URL from the site     mediawiki_message(key): Retrieve the text of the MediaWiki message with                             the key ""key""     has_mediawiki_message(key)  True if this site defines a MediaWiki message                                  with the key ""key""     Special pages:         Dynamic pages:             allpages(): Special:Allpages             newpages(): Special:Newpages             longpages(): Special:Longpages             shortpages(): Special:Shortpages             categories(): Special:Categories          Cached pages:             deadendpages(): Special:Deadendpages             ancientpages(): Special:Ancientpages             lonelypages(): Special:Lonelypages             uncategorizedcategories(): Special:Uncategorizedcategories             uncategorizedpages(): Special:Uncategorizedpages             unusedcategories(): Special:Unusuedcategories  Other functions: getall(): Load pages via Special:Export setAction(text): Use 'text' instead of ""Wikipedia python library"" in     editsummaries handleArgs(): Checks whether text is an argument defined on wikipedia.py     (these are -family, -lang, -log and others) translate(xx, dict): dict is a dictionary, giving text depending on language,     xx is a language. Returns the text in the most applicable language for     the xx: wiki setUserAgent(text): Sets the string being passed to the HTTP server as     the User-agent: header. Defaults to 'Pywikipediabot/1.0'.  output(text): Prints the text 'text' in the encoding of the user's console.NEWL
But you will need to search for reliable sources,too
Nietzsche's Last Man   Was Nietzsche's concept of the Last Man explicitly implied in the title?  The article makes no mention of it per se, though it sounds implied, so I added a link at the end.
New Section at WP:ANI  There is now a New Section at WP:ANI to post any further complaints on this matter. I am sure you'll all agree this is a serious matter and that Marek69 is being stubborn and ignorant by just ignoring it. Please rally together and Rise up. We can change this thing 92.27.228.98
" So you not going tell me why you created so many accounts? Well, they say online privacy is hot these days. To start with the premise that the subject of article is strictly ancient history is to assume an answer. When I add information about the holiday, various editors ""thank"" me. So I am not only one who thinks it should be mentioned. Perhaps others are afraid of you, or just exhausted by your constant bickering.   "
Kings Norton   Shouldn't this article be part of the Kings Norton Wikipedia page? Hawkesley is part of Kings Norton after all.
Ringmail I don't know if he regards himself as an expert, I've sweated enough to know for sure that a broigne is not a victorian mistake, and to find citable sources for it. I understand that the English language wor;ld lacks proper history on the subject, but from a continental point of view, there's no mistake possible that ringmail is different from chainmail and was used in the period between the fall of Rome and the comeback of chainmail in the late 1100s. Also, the high handed way in which he remade all the article with no regard for the effots of those who came before him, and without even setting up an account for people to discuss the matter with him wxas, to my view, qualification for vandalism.  I'm quite willing to include the bit about representations making it difficult to differenciate between chainmail and ringmail, and the possibility of misconceptions in the 1800s, but the basic matter as established with my collaboration stands, even if it has to be edited further.
Yeah, this guys deleting potentially life saving information citing that the article 'doesn't look very pretty with real information', I call him a nerd and have a go at him for doing so, and I'm in the wrong. Nice to see your a human being mate. Remind me to steer clear of 'people' like you.124.176.226.45
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did again to Kernodle Middle, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Adam Reid page How can we improve this article to meet proper Wiki criteria?
emo my eye, ive been wearing sambas since i was 4(ive had the same pair for about 7 years) and ive never seen a emo kid wearing them. besides, this is all original research, so come up with some sources or i will be removing that emo stuff.74.192.12.135
Damiano photo   Hi William Chase, I don't think it's appropriate or necessary to have your name incorporated into the caption (yes, I saw the photo's page), and I think that having it copyrighted and credited to you on that page is sufficient. Fair? It's just too inconsistent with all the other photos on Wikipedia.
"  BWilkins, whatever the situation and theory, we cannot know what Stolyarov intended to do.   ''''''  What did I do this time? "
Brahmins are said to be link between Human and God, also the lead discusses about military pursuits of brahmins. It has no mention about the wandering of Brahmins for alm, which was their profession. Its been said Bhiksha is the only asset of brahmins. You wont have any problem with this glorification, but will poke your nose in matters relating to Ahirs. I am sorry to say you are casteist.
u1|rationale=I no longer wish to be a part of this community. }}
Support per sources, commonname & alphabetical order.
"Welcome!     Hello, , to Wikipedia! I'm , one of the thousands of editors at Wikipedia - I am also an Administrator. I hope you like the place and decide to stay; here are some helpful links for newcomers:      The five pillars of Wikipedia     How to edit a page     Help pages     Tutorial     How to write a great article     Manual of Style     Fun stuff...  You will get more from the site if you spend a few moments reading the above - I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions! Also tell the community a little about yourself on your User page - again, welcome to the Wiki!  (Whisper...)"
this might be a better article if someone proceeds to discuss what the book entails
What page was spammed by this user?  I don't see any edits or contributions made at all by anyone with this username.
For the record, I was serious about running in the RFA.  I was not trolling or disrupting, I was advised that I should run in the RFA to see how it was like, and I did so.  There should have been more questions during the RFA if there was any questions about sincerity.  The RFA was not a joke, it was serious.  I feel I should have been made an Admin and then would have been the better example.    I felt that there was a possibility for confirmation and this should serve as example for other users to be afraid of self nominations to the RFA, even when there is clearly a poll support for running in the RFA.  As I am truely afraid, shocked and dismayed at the admins response. As it seems now there is a new rule, if the admin feel you are faking your RFA, they can block you with zero assumptions of good faith.
Hispanics have mixed with many races. They have blond, red heads, blue eyed - you name it. See Raquel Welch who has spoken on Spanish TV about being proud to be of Hispanic descent. It does not how Hispanic any person has in them for someone else to make that determination. To continue the discussion here is not the proper place. Please do it on her talkpage.
Per the citations in the article, drumming is particularly significant in the subject's life; highlighting that is useful; specific link of drumming appropriately highlights drumming.  In the absence of an objection from a regular editor of this article, I think there's no reason not to leave the link be.-
"    Obsidian Forum Community
" And, as a show of good faith, I've actually updated the bio, tidied it up a bit, etc. It definitely is our mission to have articles on notable individuals, and this article undoubtedly falls within that scope. Your contributions so far are appreciated.  t/c "
":Thank you for responding, although you changed your vote from conditional support last time to oppose.  As your opposition appears to come from the five (5) ""Political divisions"", please note that I've identified a source (the only such source) that combines everything under ""Administrative divisions"".  Given that actual source, I will concede the point in exchange for your vote.  As past experience shows regarding Conradi, I don't expect this will help.     "
", 10 October 2013 (UTC) This is a non-trivial problem. Many perhaps most of the 5,000 editors with the highest edit count are likely to have diverse editing habits, I can think of two FA writers in that group, one who also has an awful lot of categorisation edits, another spends a lot of time on AWB. Any analysis of those 5,000 would need to work out the proportion of their edits that were of various types. Then there is the issue that you are not likely to have access to their deleted edits, and that a few of those editors have opted out of being analysed. But most importantly, the 5,000 accounts with the highest ever edit counts are not going to fully overlap with the currently most active 3,156. ''SpielChequers'' 12:48"
"   June 2010   Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Frances Farmer. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  You said ""You clearly have psychological issues."" This is an entirely unacceptable comment that crosses the boundaries of incivility into rude, inappropriate personal attacks. Such conduct is not acceptable on this site. Retract your statement or go to AN/I.   "
"   Thanks...   ...for catching this one.  Keep up the good work.  '''rolls''' "
". I have a good knowledge of Spanish and am also using my advanced spanish dictionary to help. ""Gentilicio"" doesn't translate on the web and using my dictionary is clearly refers to demonym"
"   Let me see if I've got this straight...   At around 4 o'clock this morning (an hour when sane people are in bed), you decided to revert a number of my changes for absolutely no reason at all. Then your buddy ""Sergecross"" threatened me with a badly-spelled screed pointing out what a naughty boy I am.  OK, I think I see what's going on here. By your Wiki-stalking and provocation, you hope to get me angry and call you names (which, as well all know, is the Worst. Crime. Ever. around here.) Then Sergecross rolls out his fainting couch and proceeds to ban me for most of the remaining millenium. Justice is done, and there is much rejoicing.  Tell ya what, friend. From now on, you can change any of my edits  or, indeed, anybody's edits  into anything you want. Translate them into Serbo-Croatian, substitute ""Sam the Chowderhead"" for ""George W. Bush"", change the ""World Football League"" article into a Marxist treatise that asserts George Washington and Dick Clark were gay lovers, anything. It's Christmas, and I shall be charitable.  You're welcome.   "
" You're quite welcome. Glad I could help.  "
"  Hey! The draft is properly laid out which is good, we got inline citations and most promotional content have been removed. However the draft needs more reliable sources linking towards the subject. By reviewing the sources, many of them do not mention Language Technology Centre. So finding sources which provide significant coverage on the subject is ideal. Best, GT "
I just have deleted Russian salad myself. Further discussion is welcomed here or on the article's talk page.
Jung And Einstein   In 1895 Albert Einstein was a pupil at cantonal school in Aarau, Switzerland. In 1896, after school in Switzerland, Einstein renounced his German citizenship. Carl P. Jung was born in in the Swiss canton (or county) of Thurgau. While Jung worked on Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Psychology of the Unconscious), tensions grew between Freud and Jung.   Frank P. Geyer continued to serve as a detective until August 15, 1903 when he resigned. He had been transferred to the 18th Police District in the United States. Detective Geyer had arrested James Anderson; whether this is the same Anderson mentioned in Detective Geyer's 1896 work is non-determinable. In 1912 tensions between the two psychologists came to a peak. In 1901-02 Albert Einstein acquired Swiss citizenship and completed a scientific paper, obtaining a teaching position at school in Schaffhausen, Switzerland.   The FBI file on Einstein came to light in 1983 when Robert Alan Schwartz wrote an article on the subject for The Nation magazine. Between J. Edgar Hoover and John Hutchison, democratic rights didn’t stop with McCarthy’s downfall nor with the demise of so-called notorious J. Edgar Hoover. Yet for years, zero-point energy according to Hutchison is obtained from the quantum vacuum. Hutchison claims on scientific phenomena are regularly featured and discussed by various media coverage. John Hutchison's claims of inventions and discoveries of a variety of phenomena are, like, NASA. The FBI should do an article on NASA and their non-determinable webers.  I do not find it too surprising Schwartz once more wrote about not only Frank Geyer, but Albert Einstein with not too much said about Carl P. Jung during these years around the turn of the centennial.
"   Msa Garratts   Hi,  The idea about an article is a good one, but unfortunately you've started out with an error. That is understandable as the subject is complex.   The WAGR first imported the M class Garratts, in 1911. These are very important locos, because they are the third class of Garratt to be built, and the first ""main line"" Garratt, showing the potential as a heavy freight hauler. They were followed up in 1912 by the Ms class, only difference being the Ms class were superheated. So they were also the first class of Garratts to be the subject of a repeat order. Both classes were built by Beyer-Peacock.  The Msa class were constructed in 1930 by the WAGR in their own workshops. Apparently a copy of the Ms class, they did seem to have some cosmetic differences.  The story does not end there, but moves to Victoria. The VR G class apparently is copied from the Ms class, the major difference is the frames moved outside so as to accomidate the reduced gauge. Outside framed Garratts are very rare, even in the smaller gauges. But wait there is more (no, not steak knives!). The design was used again, for the Australian Portland Cement's 3'6"" line near Geelong, the first loco being supplied in 1936 and the second in 1939. The boiler from one of these locos is used on the restored G42.  So in conclusion the design was constructed over a period of 28 years, used on three railway, on two gauges and built by two manufacturers, with, if I've added it up correctly, 27 locos constructed.  Personally I think the article should cover the history of the design, and include all the varients. Some work would be required to hunt down variations, though. So yes, I think it does deserve an article.  Please feel free to use the above if you wish.  Cheers,  Michael."
Anyone else remember Dime talking about Blues Saraceno as a major influence? Abbott mentioned this in a Guitar for the Practicing Musician article circa 1995. It seems like this should be included in musical influencesDime wore a plaid patch tattoo in honor of the guy.
"     Note that this was not disruption but was a genuine vote.  A separate account was created for this, as the proposer seemed to have done the same.  It was a little joke, you see.    "
"  resentment ""In France, the perceived preference of the British Navy for evacuating British forces at the expense of the French led to some bitter resentment"" are you sure about that? the article states the BBC said they have waited until the very last man, so it means everyone was rescued.   the French article states the French resentment vis-à-vis the BEF came from Gort's refusal to launch a ""traditional counter-attack"" as planned by French commander General Weygand. Gort wanted an evac as he claimed it was inevitable in the medium-term. the british chief of staff supported Gort and the british operation was launched instead of the french plan.  "
"   User:Metalvayne and blocking/topic ban   Hi Berean Hunter. A week ago, you blocked  msg me  "
"  I second this. If you have sources which talk about the importance of Konigsberg to Old Prussians and Masurians (the stuff on Lithuanians can be combined with the stuff on the Poles - and I already proposed changing the name of the section to ""Poles and Lithuanians in Konigsberg"") then please add them and I'll try to help with that myself. "
" Hmmm... that's exactly what pedophiles do; use the Internet to communicate in order to obtain a ""great deal of pleasure.""   "
IGNORANT FOOL...YOU'VE NEVER EVEN SEEN A MAP OF KRASNOI  You are so stupid and ignorant that you don’t even know which roads lead into or out of Krasnoi.  The road leading west out of Krasnoi was never blocked by the Russians…it was threatened by Tormasov’s enveloping movement but never actually blocked.  Your ignorance is disgusting…absolutely sickening...  Dumb freshman with low SAT's...that's what you are...   kenmore
. Please read my reply
this track listing is NOT from this films soundtrack
"  Northern Lights something.... Your names to long. It's exactly that kind of unthinking response - ""oh don't attack other editors"". How then is someone supposed to call a liar a liar? If you check up on Jehochman you will find that it was demonstrated that he deliberately lied with the intention of misleading. Yet he is still here. Check that one, I'll show you the lies of the others."
"Maybe if several users report the same person, the administrators then understand the severity of the user's vandalism...  Msg me  My contribs    "
, 27 April 2006 (UTC)   The Game is an abstract mental game, the objective of which is to forget its existence.  There is no point in calling The Game a meme, the majority of stuff on Wikipedia is a meme. A meme is simply any idea or concept. I think what this refers to is a common misconception of the word meme, basically meaning a fad. The Game has some interesting memetic properties, but these should be described elsewhere in the article if anywhere. Whoever wants the meme version up should read the meme article first.  11:04
any longer, I'm sure both editors here will come to some sort of compromise )
"  talkback from 78.26 part2   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) "
Image copyright problem with Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg  Thank you for uploading Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.  If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk)
Yeah, the only problem is that there aren't that many people involved in the discussion and you-know-who has stayed silent for the last few days thus ensuring there is no discussion to speak of. I know where to ask, I'm just unsure how to demonstrate that we're ready.
Nandesuka, you asked for it, you can certify it: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_administrator_privileges
That could be an option, but I dont' see why that would be needed since they have stated an official motive of their organisation, which is equal righst for Sunnis, while stressing many times that they are not seperatist. Just because of some wiki editor not wanting that to be put into the article (for some reason) doesn't mean people should be deprived of sourced information.
Not just church   I think there should be something about the whole village, not just the church.
Deletion of AV News page   Just curious why the AV News page is being deleted while its primary competitor Antelope Valley Press is allowed to have its page here unmolested.  Granted we have only been in business for six years but we are every bit as a legitimate news organization as AV Press and even more so than AV Town Crier, whose page is also allowed to be here I note.  Here is the content:  The AV News began as a weekly print newspaper with emphasis on local news located in Lancaster, California USA. It was the second largest circulating newspaper in the area after it began publishing in 2006. In 2008, the AV News added a website and in March 2010, much like the Seatte Post-Intelligencer, the AV News transitioned to a web-only publication. The AV News covers the Antelope Valley area of Los Angeles County - mainly the Palmdale/Lancaster Urbanized Area (a US Census Bureau defined term) and areas of north Los Angeles and southeastern Kern counties, including Acton, Agua Dulce, Edwards AFB, Lake Los Angeles, Mojave, Quartz Hill, Rosamond and Santa Clarita. The newspaper is conservative in its political stance. It is currently the official news publication of the Lancaster JetHawks, a minor league baseball team in Lancaster.  History  The AV News was founded by Fran Paolinelli in 2006. She continues to work at the publication today. It began as a weekly print publication before dropping its print version to become a web only publication at www.avnewsday.com  The paper, conservative leaning, holds strongly held views, which can become controversial at times.  Competitors in its market are the Daily News, Antelope Valley Press and the Los Angeles Times.  External links AV News Official Website  The format is the same as the AV Press. There is less historical info that the AV Press because we have only been going for six years and they've been up for decades. But still, we are getting e-mails from people who use Wiki to find out about the Lancaster/Palmdale area and are surprised to find out that there are more newspapers in the area than what they find listed.  I also point out that the City of Lancaster is a major advertiser with us as is the local professional baseball team.  Please info me as to what more I need to include so that our page will be left on site or restore the page.
All the references state the plane hit turbulence, as wikipedia is built apon references, that is what I put, I have no affiliation with Continental, and it seems you do! TURBULENCE IS THE REASON as witnesses on the plane describe aswell as the pilot! So make any accusations you want but for now, turbulence is the main reason and factor of the flight. Now just remember, FOLLOW THE RULES AND stop saying major news broadcasters like CNN and BBC are false because you 'seem to think you are right'!
Al Arbour    Hey Fucktard. Al Arbour died on Friday. Try having someone read an obituary to you
"I fixed my AFD mistakes... rolled it all back. That's a handy tool, everyone should have it. ;) Haha. Ugh, but yea. Avoided some shit there. Good times. This is why I avoid AFD. Not really, but you know what I'm sayin'. I'll try closing properly later... maybe. Haha. ''''''Love   "
I took a look at his edits, and he's been back since the 4th. So far only two of his edits have been about the adult scene: the Jenna Jameson article, and the Joey Yale article. The first you knew about, the second was his classic link removal job and had already been reverted. All his other edits have been to sundry athlete articles, where he seems to be adding details about their high school years which is okay by my book...
Its not quite like that - ISIL adopted an existing flag in use by others and then got famous.
Isn't there a rule at Wikipedia against personal attacks? Or does Sanchez have a special exemption? He's been warned time after time after time after time, but keeps doing it. Why does Wikipedia give Sanchez special treatment?
Dude, who fears banning. This is what U HINDU terrorists are perfect at. This is the 1st personal attack I am making on u.U have till now banned International Human rights orgs in J&K;,Punjab,North East....etc.banning is the only thing of ur expertise. I know u r a stooge of RSS/SHIV SENA/Bajrang Dal ...yuck names ......that is Hindu terrorist orgs. Now I am 100 percent sure......u r one of those killers of Chittisinghpura.....U r a terrorist ( i wont call u a Hindu terrorist coz I dont want to defame Hindus as such) Waiting for Ban:)
"  blue ribbon schools OK, thanks for letting me know.  I wasn't aware of that.  It's not as if there are only a few of them, there are quite a lot, but the school notability requirements are far too low for my tastes.  I won't revert, though.  )  talk "
yep, considering it had no support for MMS before.
anti-israel comments are not ANTI SEMETIC  ahh another zionist coming to save the propaganda! im not an antisemite, nor have i said anything of the sort, prove to me where i said anything against JEWS. Zionism is not a race, or religion, it is as fanatic as radical ISLAM. and do not threaten me, as it is not allowed86.139.179.254
"  Fix it yourself instead of just saying ""someone needs to ...."""
" ""In an interview, Selena said was intimidated by"" shouldn't it be ""she said""?   "
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   | Talk to Madeline
We should not have religious beliefs, evolution or creationist beliefs brought into wikipedia on edits. We need a nice neautral position not in favour of any of them, sticking to objective data and not subjective viewpoints. The user in dicussion here deals with subjectivity only, anything which opposes his own faith - is deleted, reverted etc. I can not bring this up anymore this is all he does on wikipedia confirmed by his history. The user in question is your best friend fair play. If there was a conscience at play here someone would do something about it, but nobody else is looking into this except yourself, so you will obviously win this by position of authority winning as i could easily obtain a ban, this place is not neutral, i will stay inactive for a year and come back later when things are more fair on here.
It would be fine, but you are refusing to allow obvious content, and lets face it, you would refuse to allow it (esp. in the lead) even if sources were provided. I notice that you are a skeptic, and probably atheist, so are pushing an opinion, and if I am vandalising, you are doing exactly the same, just pushing the opposite opinion
Oh that great repository of Free Cultural Works. There's an example of where the wisdom of the crowd slides downhill when the crowd consists of mainly nerdy young men. °Talk
(UTC) Really it's not. I'm Australian, don't regard myself as a PC-pusher but I'd think Uluru has moved ahead of Ayer's Rock as the preferred name by most people. Certainly when I was younger (in the 1980s) it was pretty much unheard of to say Uluru and anything other than Ayers Rick made you look like some sort of lefty nutter but in the last 10 years or so it's changed. Oh and using Qantas as an example is probably not ideal - the airport they fly to is called Ayers Rock so it's understandable they'd prefer that name. Anyway just my 2c...   05:02, 18 June 2014
There is a fine picture here. I don't know about copyright  . http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/13/brooke-astor-is-dead-at-105/
I got a warning and a ban for mentioning it. The term they used was 'personal insult.'
have sex with our users like areaseven
recent edit on gurjar   mr sitush please stop doing vandalism on gurjars. gurjars are pak 2nd largest ethnic group of pakistan
"  As the reference you are using: http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/87642.pdf (page 8) names teh country as Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia it is more accurate to use this name. Also using teh term of just ""Macedonia"" may please the Christian population of teh country but is still not recognised by E.U, the subject of this article, and also might lead to  the dissambiguation site of the MAcedonian region. Lest use the sources and reference acurately  "
"  Speedy deletion of SupportSpace  A tag has been placed on SupportSpace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.   If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.    "
Never mind. It's already happening. Oh well.
Yes, this confirms that I agree to refrain completely from editing Female genital mutilation and related pages for six months.   Thank you for your peacekeeping efforts and TIA for the unblock.(t•c)
Ultimately, I think the PerthWellington article should simply be removed, and redirect here (and that the Perth—Middlesex article should be brought up to date).
Always Do Well To Stop A Citizen's Arrest?   Hey, I absolutely refuse to edit articles.  I've left that duty to my betters.  Why don't you try to fix the problems that hamper good reading out of Wikipedia?  I come here often to learn something new.  I don't like being jerked around by anybody, whether those guilty of breaking all the rules, or you who wants to ignore it and shove a boot up my ass for complaining!  24.255.11.149
You might try to deflate your ego a bit and stop making blanket generalizations.  The IP I use is a proxy for a university of 20,000 people, plenty of other editors (yes, Macedonians too) who use it. Sometimes I just don't notice I was logged out. Does that satisfy your sensibilities? I haven't called anyone peasant or fuck off, that is your overactive imagination playing tricks on you again.      As for the statement, I am simply presenting the fact that it is much more informative and encyclopedic to say the 'Macedonian National Liberation Army' liberated the city, as they were the only 'communist partisans' operating in Macedonia at that time, which you could have realized yourself by reading the article on MNLA.
Ossory citations   And that's how Wiki works. Citations, not long rants.
" Support Just because we can disambiguate by capitalization doesn't mean we should. I suspect most readers who type in ""Top Hat"" expect to read about a hat, not a film.   "
"  Anyone have any thoughts on the addition of Bernard Lonergan to the list of notable metaphysicians?  Since Augustine, Aquinas are listed and Lonergan is clearly in this trajectory of Catholic philosophers, I thought he would be a good addition to the list. His work is well-regarded in 20th century philosophy, he certainly has the credentials, and I think many would agree he made highly significant contributions to metaphysics by extending the core ideas of Aristotle, Augustine and Aquinas forward in the areas of cognitional theory, epistemology and verifiable metaphysics based on the ""data of consciousness"" and his study of methodology in mathematics and empirical science. see Insight: A study of Human Understanding. There are Lonergan Centers at Boston College, University of Toronto, Seton Hall, and Loyola Marymount University devoted to studying and extending his works in philosophy and theology. I'm quite sure nearly every philosophy professor at any Jesuit schools would consider his work ""notable"".  My attempt at this addition was reverted as ""not particularly notable as a metaphysician"" so  thought I would throw it out there.  "
Damn wiki admins   What is it with all these wiki admins and THEM not being able to follow RULES and policies such as the NPOV, 3RR and rules pertaining for VANDALISM.  if anyone knows how i can get in touch directly with SENIOR Admins i would greatly appreciate it as some admins just make their owns rules up on the spot while disobeying wikipedias rules and effectivly slamming banhammers  and no, im not talking about all admins, but i am talking about quite a few admins!
Université Lille Nord de France   I want to redirect this page to Lille University Northern France. How can this be easily done? Sincerely,
u aint got no pancake mix lady so stopppp
"   It seems edit-warring is back   Long time no see. Unfortunetly, I am here once again to say user ""Ninguém"" is once again edit-warring my edits. Funny, I have been out of Wikipedia for some days (too busy) and while I was out, user ""Ninguém"" almost did not post anything in Wikipedia. Now that I am returning, the user seems to be once again active in Wikipedia. It's incredible how fast he is able to edit an article I have recnetly edited. In a few minutes, he's there posting or reverting something. When I am not posting in Wikipedia, he is not posting too.   I think it's clear the other user follows my edits. It's also funny an user who claimed to not to be associate with Wikipedia, who seemed to be leaving the projective, is once again active (only because I am returning). With hundreds of articles in Wikipedia, it seems the other users is only interested in the articles I recently posted. This is really strange. I try to be far from the other user, but it's impossible because he follows me and spends hours a day checking my recent edits. Please, do something aboout. It cannot keep this way.   "
Daysleeper STOP Vandalizing FDNY Page
" September 2008 (UTC)  Hi Casliber. Sorry for the lack of communication. I was busy with college (started on 2nd), and never really got much time to read the parvans. Those parvans are really lengthy and it will be quite some time before I finish the first. I've decided to refocus my editing to CS articles for the time being. If I need any help, I'll ask you. Cheers!  (talk · mail) 02:33, 16"
Also, there isn't any proof that NASA or the Navy SEALs have ever used his knives or been trained by him (why would they want to be trained by some know-nothing guy with no combat experience?)
"Hello everyone, this is my page and it's a shared IP address so be careful who you leave messages for!                 An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:River.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —       Kenny Rogers & Dottie West photo  Yeah that's fine, it sounds okay to me.       Thanks  thanks.. its fine with me if you delete , that's a duplicate one! thnk u very much     User:Josenian         Bot question      Would you be interested in developing a bot like this? On Staeckerbot you have the duplicate function that may be needed for this bot to. tast   Sorry, I'm a bit busy these days and it seems a bit complicated for my schedule. Thanks for thinking of me, though.    No need to be sorry. tast       Thanks...      ...for reverting Image:Wpixcw11-1.jpg back from the previous incorrect logo uploaded by .  I had tried, but how did you do it?     On the image description page, in the File History section,  each version should have a little (rev) link, which you click to revert to that version.    Orphaned non-free image (Image:HipHopYoda.jpg)  Thanks for uploading Image:HipHopYoda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).     If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.        Deletion of Will Ferrell image?      Why did you delete Image:Will-talladega-uk-premiere.jpg?  I have been in discussions with Pd THOR and I thought we had come to a conclusion about the copyright attribution issues. Can you shed some light, please?   Sorry- I didn't know you were discussing it- should've checked the incoming links more carefully. I commented at       Non-free use disputed for Image:AnEncyclopediaofClaims.jpg     This file may be deleted.  Thanks for uploading Image:AnEncyclopediaofClaims.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify
"  I agree with the changing to ""euphemism"" By no means are these metaphors. Also, 1/2 of these are made up, guys."
"  Remove the lists of stations, no one is looking for a list of train stations in Canada. There's Category:Rapid transit stations in Canada if you really want one. According to the article, rapid transit is a subway. This article should only mention the three rapid transit systems in Canada, and have a summary of each, similar to Light rail in Canada. Also, is ""rapid transit"" the preferred name in Canada, or do we borrow the American name ""subway""? Since I've never lived in one of these three cities, I don't know.   "
"   ""Uncle Sam"" poster   Is the poster influenced more by Uncle Sam, or by the original featuring Lord Kitchener?  "
Please do not make changes with no explanations.  This page has been recently updated.
" Thank you! That recovers a lot of work I did sorting the lists, etc. WP is full of lists which have nothing for sources but the Wikis they are lists OF: as in list of birds, list of trees, etc. So what's the big problem here? From the way somebody's trying to speedy-d this thing, and you'd think it was full of a bunch of peoples' home addresses or SSNs! What is the big rush, please? There's quite time enough to put a {fact} tag on entries people are suspicious off, or click on the link to see the person wearing a bowler hat, and what more do you want? Somebody on the deletion page really doesn't understand the point of list-articles, do they?  "
Volunteer Marek is a well known POV pusher/edit warrior who has been involved in outed Russophobic cabals in the past and was blocked for a long period of time from editing eastern europe related articles. I don't understand why he's even allowed to edit these articles when he so clearly has not changed his habits.
That is in general my feeling, however I try to practice WP:FAITH.. but that can only go on for so long.  Talk
I'd also like to add that you have potential as an editor.  Hence why I'm so responsive to you on your talk page and all.  I understand the concerns that you've raised, and I think we're just making bold edits because we know what we're doing (or more appropriately, we like to think that).  You're going to run into editors of various philosophies; mine is obviously be-anal-about-citing, which has worked out for me so far. — (talk • contrib • review) -
Translation   I was hoping that some people who frequent this page might actually speak Hebrew. Can anyone, perhaps, provide a transation or at least transliteration for the term גיס חמישי (I hope I copied that right) on Fifth column?
just aying thanks for your input on the Baritone guitar page. that was quitehelpful. )
"   The Pinkprint   It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for The Pink Print to the The Pinkprint. Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, ""The Pinkprint"", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728).  Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014.  Thank you for your time,   ."
OHHHHHH THIS IS THE NEW STUFF!!!!!!!!   OHHHHH!!! please phone me, (410) 439-7695 ok??!!! ) i love ur wikikikipedia werk can u tell me how o ud o??/ it ??????? ok. pls dont deleat this again ia m want to know what u r say about me pls!!!! ok????? i luv u and everything, so it is, so it is ok????? ) yes. cookys
B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering   Jeez man, give me a few minutes before you nuke the page Lolz.  I'm in the middle of building B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering. We had 5 articles redlinking it, all trying to use different spellings. I unified those links. I saw another half dozen articles mentioning it, that could be linking it. I decided to pull over the Russian copy of the article. How about you pull off the deletion tag and check back in an hour or two?
"This is the current Smackdown song as of October...... does anyone know the name of it шшє ₣дN  ӧ9    im pretty sure its Jet Black Stare- On The Floor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2urIbuHimok&feature;=related  "
" Reply Oh, not half as interesting as it sounds.:O) ·(t) "
" I disagree. Slang should only be used in direct quotes. And even though this could be a direct quote, the rest of the plot summary isn't (and shouldn't be). So the word ""kiss"" is better. Incidentally, if this is about Victoire, it isn't important enough to be in the summary to begin with, but as per the section above this one, it'll be futile trying to remove it now.  (talk • contribs •  count) "
"   I...Butter is ""a butter substitute""  The references given (see discussion on this above) on this are improperly given. What is given appears to be little more than a google screen scrape. I managed to find both references and they do not support this usage. The use in these publications is not to define but to indicate the broad category. Peanut butter (if placed in the category of a 'nut butter') is also in the category if 'butter substitute' but it is not a type of margarine, which is what this product is. Possibly it might be helpful to say that the product is commonly used to substitute butter but it doesn't help in the basic definiton.   "
Big cleanup needed  Obviously, this article needs a bit of work.  As I see it, we need two things: sections within the list, and inclusion criteria.  On sectioning, I believe that we would do well initially in making two sections: Proposed systems, and systems that actually made it to production.  On inclusion criteria, I recommend that we limit it to launch systems that have articles.  Some proposed launch systems simply aren't notable.  So they don't get included here.  So there you go, I suppose.   (Talk)
"   Dr. Robotnik   Why is Dr. Robotnik sometimes called ""Eggman""?"
"  Hmmm...is that a roundabout way of saying ""lie""? Whatever.... -BC aka  "
" But Stranger Danger is so fun (. Good luck again!<3  TALK!! "
"  I can see where you would find it personally upsetting, yes; but remember what you're dealing with here.  This is the internet.  No one knows who you are on the internet.  If someone walked up to you in a shopping mall, you wouldn't have any clue who they were ten ways from Sunday.  So don't take it personally, because WP and the 'net in general are impersonal by definition.  I concur with what Mindspillage said above here: it would be a great loss to WP if you left over this nomination.  It simply isn't worth it.  You're too good of a contributor to give in that easily; I do hope you reconsider.   | say something! "
Idiot  Blanche Barrow was not hit in the face with glass at Dexfield Park. Where did you get this bullshit?
You might be interested in WP:ANI#Five-year-old deletion discussion reopened.  Adler
I saw that you started Category:Romani people and Romanipen in Romania and it looks good. I have in my mind plenty of ideas to expand the articles and make other new, just let's see how I'll manage to get free time for this.
Thanks, Osplace, for checking this out.  It's good to get rid of any copyright material.  —
" Please consult the article Ball culture, which states ""drag queen, or transgendered"". WP:OR does not cover synthesis by bringing two facts together.  As well, the term ""Femme queen"" does not have an article, so the term is currently of dubious usage as it's a neologism, (which WP policy suggests to avoid using).  You state a source: ""TGMSMNET"", however neither this page, nor the mainpage refer to such a reference.  From the way you talked about it, I linked it to the ""MSTSW"" reference.  In the future, if you could, could you please site resources on this page by using this form? [http://example.com http://example.com] That way it shows up like this http://www.example.com, and one can simply click on the resource, rather than search through the article for the reference itself.  Your data is backed up there as well.  However, we still have issue... how would the CDC consider a post-op MTF living in stealth as anything else but a ""female""... the MTF would obviously not admit to being a transsexual, and in fact engages in no activity any more risky than a ""biological"" female.  (I wait for further evidence that TG/TS is caused by biological factors, and thus the term ""biological male/female"" becomes complicated in even research... no one would ever state that a woman with CAIS is ""biologically"" a male...)  As well, I understand the point of not using WP as a soap box... however in talk pages, I'm still free to assert the better application and appropriate nature of the term ""people having URAP""...   "
"  Please take a break I have been reading this snafu.  You are doing yourself no favors; please take a break.     I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc.  Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ""to protect the encyclopedia"" is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue.  "
"'m not going to argue with you. The page clearly said that the biography was written by Muze, not NME. If you don't believe me, take a look. Scroll all the way down to the bottom, and you'll see this disclaimer. ""Copyright 1989-2008 Muze UK Ltd. For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved."" Information from Muze is mass-distributed and appears on various websites, including NME. Just because it appears on the website of a reliable source doesn't mean that Muze is reliable. I've repeatedly apologized for my actions, but any stubbornness on my part does not mean that I was the only person who behaved against the rules. You were clearly being stubborn, as you are now, by denying that the biography is from Muze rather than NME. (  ) I"
Thanks for the feedback. As for Insight, numerous sources have claimed it is an industry first. I will be researching further by posting at the Norton and Wilders forums.
" 2010 (UTC) I don't think the definition from Webbs really works given the change that has happened since it was first written (1917) . The idea that professionals ""supply disinterested counsel and service to others, for a direct and definite compensation, wholly apart from expectation of other business gain"" is a bit naive, particularly in the I think a more realistic and up to date defintion is required. For instance, in the light of Holocaust, in which many German professionals acted as instruments of a disfunctional state, which would tend to indicate that ""service for others"" may not be have the intention, but was taken to a tragic extreme. Likewise the recent financial crisis would tend to indicate that profession of banker (if it is a profession) has shown to conducted wholly for business gain (i.e. higher profit, larger bonuses), whilst other professions have shown themselves to be very interested in business gain, often to the detriment to the business (e.g. accountants in the Enron scandal).  I am not saying that Perks is the ideal source of information, but would suggest we need to cast around for a better definition, and one that is couched in more modern language.  (talk|contribs) 16:44, 1 November"
Tangential and TS   There are a few judgement calls there that we will have to do a second pass on.  I did include the Bee Bees (see my comment in Bee Gees) in it (Jeb and dubya, that is) and I did not include Jesse Jackson.  Those three guys are in too many categories as it is.  You want to remove a few from the category?  Be my guest, but do not get greedy about undoing my work.
Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -
"  Not everyone. ""Reason"" is a notoriously partisan source.  "
":::::You resorting to dishonesty is disgusting and vile Binksternet. For starters, dating back to the original discussion back in December 2009, while the user Optigan liked FinancialNorth1, he preferred a cropped version of the fourth photo, to which no including PaulH or you for that matter said anything as clearly noted in the discussion. As i'm saying again for the umpteenth time and as the record showed, no decision was made and the discussion ended. Paulh, or you did not say anything. If he wanted the photo then, why didn't he continue to press his case then and convince a consensus then? I would've left it at that then, but instead he and other editors remained silent. I didn't restart the discussion because I assumed that the editors simply lost interest, or didn't have the time.  Furthermore, I did not ""slip in"" as you disgustingly, dishonestly, facetiously say. I only added that photo because I noticed for the time being that no one had made a decision since the original discussion back in January. Again, no one did anything for months. You and Paulh cannot claim you didn't see the change, because you made several other edits throughout the article for months.  Again, Paul did not form a consensus prior to the change, or continue the discussion where it had left off. Once again, he instead changed the photo, got a ""consensus"" from Binksternet. The IP editor liked the photo, but, quoting the editor again:  ""Any of the photos in that section (""FinancialNorth.jpg""; ""Montgomerystreetsf.jpg""; ""Federal Reserve Band (San Francisco).jpg"") except #2 (SanFranciscoEmbarcadero.jpg) would be fine as a replacement, and even the cropped version of #2 is better than the one currently there now. Thoughts?64.81.57.93 (talk)""  ""I'm going to replace it with ""FinancialNorth.jpg"" and see what happens.""  The crux of it was that Paulh made the change before even Binksternet approved it, or I or other editors could respond.  Binksternet's abusive little crusade against me shows my point that he and Paul have no interest in perusing collaborative editing efforts. Despite my reverts, I at least agreed to having a discussion and a ""photo choosing contest"" as it were. Paulh did not and Binksternet is now acting as some kind of enforcing. I don't see Binksternet asking the IP editor in question or other editors to the SF article including Optigan13 have their say either in this. He is not apologizing to me and asking that we resume the discussion and consensus, something that at least Paulh did earlier. Only showing his intentions as pure slander towards me as attempt to have me banned purely because he disagrees with my edits or whatever personal victory he may get by flaming me   "
"   Speedy deletion declined: Castle Age  Hello The Blade of the Northern Lights. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Castle Age, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previously declined, please do not re-tag. Use WP:AFD or WP:PROD instead.  Thank you.  Why "
YAWN!!     The above COMMENT is a quote from McNeight!!!  AND yet HE still insistes on adding that damn 'preceeding unsigned.....yada...yada'  What a RUDE and obnoxious individual.
I caught you vandalizing a page on wikipedia. Normally right now id block you, but you happen to pull this shit while I'm in a transitional period so I don't wanna block you, I wanna help you. You see the path of the righteous wikipedian is beset on allsides by the inequalities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. So basically dont be such a dick and fuck up wikipedia. I worked really hard creating and maintaining this website and many people enjoy my invetnion without causing such harm. But you sir, you are a different animal. I dont think Ive ever caught anyway vandalizing wikipedia before. You sir are a true original. A true renegade. Your so bad ass I cant think straight. Im all bendy and shit and this fervor is giving me the vapors. Please brother, sister or inbetween dont mess up wikipedia. think about the children and do like the cats in my neigborhood do... shit in the sandbox.
I was finishing creating a page and I wanted to know if I had cited the sources correctly. I also wanted to know how to make the page an actual Wikipedia page and know how to change the name of the page. The page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raymond37/Phoebe_Allen%27s_Hummingbird. I tried putting this same question on the teahouse and I got no answer.
i'll hook your mom you motherfucker. yeah suck my balls and slurp my come. bitch.
sleep and wikipedians   anybody out here who cant sleep? I have been up all night on wiktionary adn its now0727local time. strange
Calling an edit war an edit war isn't a personal remark. Its a simple statement.
Just checked you history. You are a Kannada right? You don't have any history to write about Kannadigas?   You motivated moron targeting and deleting Tamil identities in all possible ways.  I don't know how Wikipedia is allowing guys like you to go ahead with clear conflict of interest. I am writing to the highest authority about 5 guys like you playing with gods and history relating to India and Hinduism.  Will slipper you if i receive one more notification from you.
"   December 2007    You have been blocked quite a while from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia.     "
If you could look in....   I am considering going live with
Do you pride yourself in your ability to write such poetic and profound statements that mean nothing? Maybe you should take up poetry - you can show off your English skills to the world.
" the argument is that deism (in GW's case) was an informal subdivision of Episcopalian terology, not an organized religion one could ""belong"" to. He claimed membership in and was active in his Ang/Epis church but never said a word about being a deist, never joined a deist group & and never attended any deist ceremonies.  "
"  I wonder what would be your NPOV version of the following article: Muslims believe that Muhammad was the last Prophet and Messenger of the monotheistic Abrahamic tradition, and that the Quran is the last revelation of God. Muslims also believe that after Quran and Muhammad, there will be no guidance from God. In the Quran, Muhammad is referred to as the ""Seal of the Prophets"" or the ""last Prophet"". Followers of Mani (founder of the Persian faith Manichaeism) believe that these titles (the Seal of the Prophets and the Last Prophet) are attributed to Mani who, his followers claim, came before Muhammad. I've bolded the statements that makes it NPOV. Now tell me how it compromises NPOV. If you are so much concerned with NPOV then why are you reverting to usedbook's version? I have asked him to cite sources of his claim and he didn't do so.  "
First, I just realized via your question that I could answer here. (Assuming it saves.) Yes, I finally get that my attacks were totally inappropriate and unneccessary? I confess I did not at first, even this morning. I realize I made inappropriate attacks after looking at his contributions and assuming some highly speculative personal motivation and then asking him about it in an offensive way. I would not be at all surprised if others have made negative assumptions about me based on looking at my contributions history and attacked me, so the user does have my sincere sympathies and apologies. What to do differently when groups go after me? Write a better Wikiquette name several people? Go to WP:ANI naming several people? Do User:RfCs naming several people? That is where I admit I need further advice.  Since a 7.5 year old off wiki email is often the focus of harassment, and so far the advice is not to go into detail about it, I don't know how to defend the recurrent references to it. Let me say again, it was a stupid, overly generalized and exaggerated response, but certainly not written with some evil bigoted intent. I feel that a lengthy correction of it complete with refs about then existing specific incidents/issues/etc, or stating in detail my current views, would be inappropriate, even on my user page and doubtless lead to more accusations by people who have a different POV.  But if there's some policy on this that I missed, I sure wish people would help me out with that.
do not delete my comment you zionist  you are not allowed to delete my comment, so please do not do that! once it is up it is up! i have been warned, so there is no need for deleting it. if you are, then get rid of the warning! i have read the rules. also stoppin trying to spread your propaganda your zionist freak. you might aswell, name this page 'how to make a terrorist state into a briliant state. your propagnadist! get a life86.139.179.254
re: Collective Punishment   Please see my response http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_punishment. Thank you.
"   ""Head (geography) or headland, a type of peninsula"".  This isn't right. A headland is not a peninsula at all.   "
Edited by Daniel Danger Molineux (danALLMIGHT@hotmail.com)
"   The Band's legacy, Beggar's Banquet, etc.   An anonymous user is repeatedly misreading The Guardian source and insisting on adding a dubious tag to it.  Here's the direct quote:  The spark for Fairport taking this watershed turn was the Band's 1968 album Music from Big Pink, the record that - along with Bob Dylan and the Band's Basement Tapes bootleg - brought about a widespread musical volte-face, in which what remained of psychedelia was replaced by a new rootsiness. Among the rock aristocracy, its influence was evident in the Beatles' ill-fated back-to-basics project Let It Be, the Rolling Stones' purple patch that began with Beggars Banquet, and Eric Clapton's decision to call time on Cream.  The anonymous user takes issue with this statement, claiming that Music from Big Pink could not have influenced Beggar's Banquet because of chronology, i.e., that the Stones were almost done recording the album when Big Pink came out.  But, read the statement: it does not say that it influenced the recording of Banquet, but the ""purple patch that began with...,"" etc.  This seems clear to me.  I would like to hear some other editor's opinions on this matter. -''''''TheFortyFive "
It was a mistake for all 15 cabinet positions, and all 7 cabinet-level positions, from the time they were nominated, until their confirmation by the Senate? Please.
Migit wrestler   Why does it have to say that? Why cant it say dwarf or little person? Calling a dwarf a migit is a) rude and b) WRONG (PEOPLE ARENT SUPPOSE TO SAY IT)
Userification of Cooked TV   Hello Darkside05, I have userified the article on Cooked TV as requested.  Please see  (speak to me) .
"  I've fixed the De La Salle link - it showed up as a notification for me because the dab page is one I created.  But looking at the article raises the much bigger point: a navbox like that should not be part of the text of one article, but should be a template, added to the various appropriate articles. I see you created the navbox, so please sort this out. See WP:NAVBOX. Thanks. D "
" So I hope you will oppose any version of FR that would not have prevented this case, as not being fit for purpose. In just the same way that a retraction will be due from Jimbo if he somehow comes up with a proposal that would not have ""100% prevented"" the Ted Kennedy incident.  I hope that you might also realise that if in your words the case here is ""thankfully relatively rare"", why many people would then think that applying a blanket measure such as Flagged Revisions is not very appropriate at all. I contrast it as the British Government contending every citizen must be forced to carry an identity card, on the presumption that is the best way you can catch terrorists, which happen to also be ""thankfully relatively rare"". Why not for example in this specific case take a more intelligent approach, and implement sopmething that prevents or flags any edit that adds the word ""molesting"", instead of forcing onto all BLP articles an incredibly blunt and incredibly bad faith assuming measure? (and any interested observers, please, stop before you say it, these valid concerns with what FR is/could be cannot all just be washed away by referring to the quite irrelevant 'advantage' of FR of opening up the tiny minority of protected articles).  And to further address the specific example you give, maybe you can expand on why anybody would be likely to believe that one sentence claim, when it was added to the article along with another 15 sentences, which at best hint at the whole thing being a hoax, and at worst, screams delete me now for being total WP:BOLLOCKS. We can also discuss how an editor in between the vandalism and your removal 'fixes the article for typos'  without noticing that it is 90% complete bollocks? Even when one of the typos is a few words away from the molesting red flag. A systemic failure perhaps?  And finally, as an admin, perhaps you can tell me why the IP user is not now blocked, irrespective of how long ago the edit occurred. Incidentally, the now famous bad account on Ted Kennedy was also not blocked immmediately after his first edit was a BLP violation on an unrelated article. Another systemic failure?  I'm all for criticla analysis of cases 'FR would have prevented', because they frequently pose more questions than they answer, about the whole model of Wikipedia, never mind how we efficiently and intelligently prevent BLP violations.   "
"   Replaceable fair use Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif   Thanks for uploading Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:   Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.  On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.  Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.  If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy.  If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. .718 "
Reason for false info   My cousin came to my house and was fucking with my wiki so I'm sorry for any false info on any pages
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.    | Talk
"   Ahem, wtf are u talking about sire? I do not practice ""vandalism""."
Just because you find a source doesn't make it legitimate or encyclopedic. And what about a Spanish-language flag? Are you showing the flag of Spain? Our western hemisphere readers might not like that very well. They went to war with Spain, just like we Americans went to war with the British, to get out from under that flag, as it were.
reverting to last known edit by me.   The article was vandalized a few days ago and is now being returned to its original state. Any users wishing to dispute the information should do so here. If sysops examine the network log files, they will discover that the vast majority of referers come from 9/11 Truth sites, and the vast majority of exit links go to 9/11 Truth sites. Therefore, removing that information was damaging wikipedia's reputation. Visitors are depending on wikipedia to cover the work that Jones is currently involved in, which of course includes everything relating to 9/11 that was on that page.  Using the CT term to describe 9/11 theories is ad hominem and also not NPOV, and therefore not civil. Anyone endorsing that type of thinking is not NPOV and ask them to not edit the 9/11 pages.  As the Zogby poll shows, 42% of America believes the government is covering up 9/11 and 45% want a new investigation including government officials possibly being involved.  For now on, any vandalism or ad hominem remarks will be dealt with via official complaints using Wikipedia protocol.  Also, even though my ad hominem remarks were direct retaliation, I do apologize for them. Anyone using these types of remarks should not be editing these pages. I expect anyone and everyone to be civil.
| Talk 22:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
"   Osli73 is wrong, yet another time!   You stated that this statement is not in reference to the ICTY:   ""By seeking to eliminate a part of the Bosnian Muslims, the Bosnian Serb forces committed genocide.""  Yet, another time, I am proving you wrong, read here:  http://www.un.org/icty/krstic/Appeal/judgement/krs-aj040419e.htm  "
" We have a color for ""Altaic"" just as we have a color for other non-genetic groups such as ""Papuan"" and ""American"" in order to keep the number of colors at a manageable level.  But most linguists have never been convinced of the validity of ""Altaic"" as a genetic group and the majority of linguistics simply view it as a Sprachbund.  I doubt that further research will reveal anything more convincing.  The notion of ""Altaic"" has been around for 60-something (or more) years and has failed to convince the majority of historical linguists in that time.  It's not like we're dealing with unknown languages and simply lack enough data.  ""Altaic"" is likely never to be demonstrated to be a valid genetic grouping.    "
I am not a sock puppet i am just good at what I do so dont get confused thanks.  Genious of Wikipedia's editing
"  @Shmayo I already know the map from John Speed, but this far away from being an evidence that the Suryoye/Suraye called themselves Assyrians or considered the ancient Assyrians as their ancestors. The ""Deutschen"" don't call themselves Germans (Germanen) or Alemanes (Alemannen) in their native tongue and it's not the first time that the word Suryoye/Suraye was mistranslated into ""Assyrian"" by outsiders:missionaries and colonists. Do you have quotes or chronicles from Nestorian Christians BEFORE the 19th century and in their OWN words, which shows an ethnic Assyrian continuity? The Syriac-Orthodox Church has quotes and chronicles which goes hundreds of years back, where they equate Suryoyo with Oromoyo in their OWN words. Interestingly, the Arameans from Maalula who are either Christian Melkites or Muslims call their Aramaic language/dialect also ""Siryon"" or ""Loghtha Siryanoytha(Aramoytha)"", which is a result of Greek-Christian influence on the Arameans. The word Suryoyo, which literally simply means Syrian in English is rather a religious term similar to Maronites, Catholics or Melkites. Nevertheless words can change their meanings in course of history. Even if the word Suryoyo derives from Assyrian ot doesn't change the fact that the Arameans where also known by this name.   "
" ""1894...simple transformer substations, directly the electricity from public networks"". Leaving the syntax aside, I am unsighted with regard to public electricity supply networks in 1894, hence the {{cn}} tag.    "
I have cleared the trivia section from NA callsigns article.  09:48, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
About the syrian civil war map   edit the map if it is incorrect but don't delteit,this war don in the libyan civil war article
" Why are you asking here, since you are a member of FilePile? There's an interesting ""discuss"" thread you could ask this in. -  "
Marnanel your talking nonsense, there is no dispute in the real world. Money magazine wrote that article after complaints were made is now out dated. Stevensons legal battles have been settled for some time. All the text vary from each other which is reflected on the page. There is no dispute between Powers and myself. Her attorneys were contacted and since then her products have reverted to her particular text only. The problem was these people thought they could cheat me and they got caught. Now they have suffered terrible embarassment over it. The matter has been resolved and I Am Not willing to sacrifice my legacy with the public hog washing these stories. Enough is enough. Money Magazine never interviewed one single author for that story. My legacy does not revolve around Money magazine but my authorship. And if you want to present the Footprints Poem in the Wiki you must show the chronology of the poems history.   What is it that you need to present reliable source to this article? Be specific. I removed my published book from world wide marketing is that enough proof of authorship for you. If so then see authorhouse for details or contact me. Thank you   Carolyn Joyce Carty
" Well they are used in all the Heart of Midlothian F.C. and Rangers F.C. articles that I edit, and have been used in both cases since before I joined Wikipedia. If you have a problem with them take it up at WP:FOOTY, I will happily remove them if there is a consensus at the project, that they should never be used. Cheers, Scot "
Help   Can someone please undo the OR being added by an IP to Almighty Vice Lord Nation? -  ✉
Merge with The Logrus and The Pattern   Neither The Logrus nor The Pattern is sufficiently independently notable to justify its own article. As such, these two articles should be merged here.
What exactly did I do wrong?   Sorry, but ... all I did was tell the truth. I put reliable sources. I'm getting fed up with people not getting it that the season was not released in the UK.
"  Deletion discussion about Shiv Ram Park  Hello, Mj.foru, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!   I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Ram Park  whether the article Shiv Ram Park should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.   The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Shiv Ram Park, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.  Thanks again for your contributions!  —>ιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης "
"      Cherian  - has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)   ....Thanks for your kind words and sweet offer. Sorry to dissappoint you...But again..thanks  Cherian  -   Smile at others by adding  to their talk page with a friendly message."
"   Coordinator slot open   Due to an unfortunate recent episode in which Eco was indefblocked (and then retired) for real-life harassment, we have a coordinator slot open. See discussion here. Cheers, —  (converse) "
"  http://www.nida.nih.gov/pdf/monographs/73.pdf#search='testing%20for%20drugs' Pg 95. Dr. Chenar, the Autopsist, had failed to originally do a drug screening. His initial diagnosis of the tumor was that it was an Astrocytoma. He then started preparing the body for the autopsy. No blood or urine specimines were kept. But then this will be considered personal research. I never said ""we....""! Subwayjack"
"Why is there no mention in the article about ""Love Hurts""?  It was a big single for the band, but other than it being listed as a single, there is no information about it in the main body of the article.  "
"  Yes, and I notice some sources call the ""antilopine wallaroo"" a ""antilopine kangaroo"". The wikipedia as it stands has a seperate article on Wallaroos which lists the differences from kangaroos, so I don't think it is really worth changing. My encyclopedia and the wikipedia both seem to use one ""R"" in forester. -(talk) "
Is this what you wanted to show?
"   Origin of the (Kutrigur) Huns   Roman historians Themistius(317-390), Claudian(370-404), and later Procopius(500-560) called the Huns Massagetae.""The World of the Huns"", Otto Maenchen-Helfen, page 4:""But considering that Themistius, Claudian, and later Procopius called the Huns Massagetae,..."" The Huns were called Massagetae also by Ambrose(340-397), Ausonius(310-394), Synesius(373–414), Zacharias Rhetor(465-535), Belisarius(500-565), Evagrius Scholasticus(6th century) and others. Alexander Cunningham, B.S. Dahiya(1980, 23) and Edgar Knobloch(2001, 15) identify Massagetae with the Great Yuezhi: Da Yuezhi -> Ta-Yue-ti(Great Lunar Race) -> Ta-Gweti -> Massa-Getae. Dahiya wrote about the Massagetae and Thyssagetae  ""These Guti people had two divisions, the Ta-Yue-Che and Siao-Yue-Che, exactly corresponding to the Massagetae and Thyssagetae of Herodotus ... "" (Dahiya 1980, 23). Thyssagetae, who are known as the Lesser Getae, correspond with the Xiao Yuezhi, meaning Lesser Yuezhi.SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS, Number 127 October, 2003, page 22-24, http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp127_getes.pdf"
"   ACES09?   Since the IP editor who keeps clammoring for this item's inclusion seems unwilling to do so, I thought I'd bring this to talk. Does anyone else besides this IP think the ACES09 ""rivalry"" merits inclusion in the article?  I just don't think we need to include a blog-based fued between fans of teams who have never even played each other merits inclusion.  I understand that it was in some Seattle papers, but lots of things are in lots of papers.  I dunno, hopefully we can get some discussion going in lieu of the edit war.    .Alpaugh "
tom birchall is bi  Bold text
(UTC)  I won't delete it. Enough that I've pointed out its flaws. I don't think such a straightforward counting as mine needs representation as a box. I'll just bold the tally.  (talk) 08:35, September 10, 2014
"   Unprotections   I was wondering what you thought of this idea.  I think it would be a good solution to situations like Steve Irwin, so that you can unprotect the article but make sure someone is watching it if you don't have the time or inclination to do it yourself.   "
" Thnx for d help, i'm logging in into twitter, if i will give my personal mobile no. to u there, will u call me ri8 now ??  talk "
" Keep kidding yourself. Thats the fanboy site you are using for your third ""reference"". You people are clueless. Goodbye.70.107.178.89  "
Didn't I supply a lot of knowledge about Einstein's name defamation? Where is your knowledge of this subject? You and your friend shall know that Ustashe movement was established in January 1929.72.75.20.29
Aaron Virdi is also famous for his Youtube videos. He did have a account called Icerastajamin. his account had millions of views on every single video. As it got popular Aaron got popular with rewards of money and fame. A This account was famous but Aaron decided to start a fresh and make a new account.At the moment Aaron is Manager of Erah. Aaron youtube link is available when clicking this link
Yeah   If you don't like the team, get the hell out of the stadium. Douche.
More pictures   We only have exterior pictures. Surely we can find some more detailed and more interesting pictures?
"  Sorry for the language, but it busts my bridges and burns my soul when controlling sysop wannabees like ""MoeRON"" go around removing other people's work. The wiki is so full of junk its unbelievable, compared to all that One More Sat Night is a good page that can get better and there's no reason for him to take off after it. Youre right about Playing, I was wrong there but I'm right about everything else. ~~~~"
"   Problematic paragraph   The following paragraph is of concern:  ""The tactics of some of the more determined ALF activists are anathema to many animal rights advocates, such as Singer, who regard the animal rights movement as something that should occupy the moral high ground, an impossible claim to sustain when others are bombing buildings and risking lives in the name of the same idea.""  Should an encyclopedia make the assertion that an argument is ""an impossible claim to sustain""?   "
"   Good work     The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Excellent job with your work on Statewide legislative elections in the United States, 2010. Continue the good work!  "
" November 2007 (UTC)  It seems that either you do not understand, either you are of bad faith. Let's make it simple:  According to Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1972), not I, the great argument of the Reform rabbis in Frankfurt (1843) was ""God ordered circumcision to Abraham, not to Moses""; in other words God's COMMANDMENT to Abraham is circumcision, God's COMMANDMENTS to Moses do not order circumcision; in other words:  - God's One Commandment to Abraham = circumcision.  - God's Ten Commandments to Moses = not even one for circumcision!  The rabbis, not I said so! Therefore, wholly and seriously documented, I wrote it into the main article but WP and S rub it out. This is an insane violation of the wiki rules.  Now, in order to enlighten the main article, the 2nd Commandment topic of this ""Discussion""  introduces my ""discovery"" (a child would do it). It says:  - God's 2nd Commandment to Moses orders him: ""Do not circumcise.""  But, contrary to the saying of PW and S, I never attributed this to the Reform rabbis.  Conclusion: who forgot to take their medicine, for several days now? Not I!  The ethical question involved about this discussion is: ""How can the wiki support a very obviously childish lie just because this lie has been carried along for millennia?"" Think about it! If you are responsible persons, you cannot publish an obvious lie without warning your readers, which I am doing.  Sigi's request to WP and S: ""Circumcise your heart, eyes, ears and pen, not your peco!"" because yes, this criminal violation of Moses 2nd Commandment is being done every day in the USA to baby boys. It even has been done to an Oregon girl, in 1950 (see http://www.aesculapiuspress.com/ - Books – The rape of innocence); indeed a good American mother cannot want her beloved daughter be deprived from circumcision when her beloved son gets it, can she? Friendly your, Sigismond 12:54, 19"
Sick of this STOP DELETING MY PAGE, I JUST CREATED ABOUT ME, FEW WORDS AND YOU DELETED, YOU WANT WAR, WELL AFTER NEW YEAR, WHEN I HAVE MORE TIME YOU WILL GET IT, BLOCK ME IF YOU WANT TO, I WILL REOPEN ACCOUNT, OR CANCEL MY ACCOUNT BETTER YET, BUT DO NOT REMOVE ABOUT ME PAGE BOY, GOT THAT VANDAL, I WAS BEGINNING TO LIKE YOU...
Interesting. Thanks, Skip.
That is clearly not the case, but even if there is, I would just remove that as trivia anyway. lute
Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2015   lamar odom is a vampire
I would like to remind everyone of that Our deletion policy says that if the article provides sufficient context to show that the topic is worthy and that it can be expanded, it should not be deleted! I hope that all will respect this policy.
"   Meaning of ""Fitnah""   The meaning of the word Fitnah, as claimed by Scholar Ibn Kathir in his tafsir, is ""Shirk"".  and also Muhsin Khan clarifies, ""And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.) (Sura 2:193)ref""  Source: tafsir Ibn kathir (verse 2:193)"
, salt-cured meat, curing (food preservation), smoking (cooking technique) - probably others. Perhaps we don't need any more general articles
see the messageboard for proof!
History of indicators   It would be useful to have charts showing changes in key indicators like GDP, growth rate, and unemployment, over several decades.
400px|thumb|The dark side of the force is the key to many abilities some consider to be...unnatural.
You Owe Me An Apology   Will you apologize to me?
The Wall Street Journal article today explains, that yes, Bergwall has convictions for earlier crimes, but that the eight murders convictions he was convicted of have been quashed. The article made no mention of the earlier convictions that were less serious offences than murder, and said that Sture Bergvall is a convicted Swedish criminal in the lead.  The article is very wordy, and yet unclear.
Charles Sumner article   Hello Dr. Jensen. I have recently been making edits on the Charles Sumner article.  I have expanded on the Dominican Republic annexation treaty and information on President Grant.  Are there any other areas that need work on the CS article?
"  No, I will make sure that will be removed permanently.  I will not do this for awhile to avoid violations, but hope that someone else will consider and agree.  There is no reason whatsoever to put ""the late"" in front of his name, I will list several reasons, and although I think that is somewhat POV, there are other reason as to why I remove the info: Everyone dies sometime - Does it really make sense to have an article about a past event and just put ""the late"" in front of everyone that has died? Poor writing - It's just sloppy/filler writing to put ""the late"" in place.  Would you ever see anyone referred to as ""the late"" in a print encyclopedia? Recentism - WP has a guideline/template that we should try not to capitalize too much on recent events and keep them in perspective.  Would it make sense 10 years down the road to still refer to him as ""the late""?  Let's make things as static as possible. Precedent - At one point, several dozen articles referred to Steve Irwin as ""The late Steve Irwin"", now, this is the only one that does (by doing a search), and there seems to be consensus about that. Knowledge of his death - Let's face it, a vast majority of people (especially those that would look for this article) know he is dead, and the few that may not be sure can click the link.  Maybe people don't want to know that he's dead or be reminded of it, and putting that acts as a spoiler.  Even Anna Nicole Smith had a few ""the lates"" put on pages of hers, and those have all been removed (a few by me, a few by others). ""Saving a click"" is not a valid reason for this, we should assume that the readers are smart, and things like that can go to the Simple English edition. Irrelevance - Why would the fact that he is dead be relevant to an article that talks about his programming?  His shows will probably be reran for many years to come, and the fact that he died somewhat unexpectedly makes no bearing on what he did on his programming.  Well, this is my case, I would also like to point out WP:OWN, which I feel has been violated in these reverts.  I also am starting a discussion on WP:Words To Avoid to get some word from other editors to make sure that I am doing the right thing.  I am supremely confident that I am, and I look forward to improving the PETA article in the future.  "
Some friendly and genteel comments from your civility police: “Tread carefully” “Tread carefully” “Have it your way” “Having it his way, lol.”[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DVdm&diff;=558110749&oldid;=558108211} I'll identify all of you by your real names. As you say, tread carefully, and have it your way.
"  Yes, the money quote is that I'm fucking pissed off at the insistence of Richard James continually harrassing me, refusing to stop identifying my personal info. (as with posting my personal email above with website). I have vandalized nothing but to take a letter or two off of my personal name and words that lead to my personal info. in the slanderous and libelous and defaming posts of richard james. I don't give a shit that my project is not listed here. I found the whole process interesting and hilarious, though quite hypocritical. WHo can take the piss out of who here. THe article was about an art project, not me. I don't care that it's not there. It doesn't exist, nor does Bigfoot! His compromise was on day two of the original posting of the project article, a one man band who decides fist down who gets what and when, like a fascist pig. I could have campaigned for votes, but what the fuck...Before final vote and deletion, Richard James posted an article about me without my desire nor consent, and then deleted it in a violent fit of rage when I jokingly said the first article is dead at another's insistence that it should be deleted then at seven days. He's had the same hard-on ever since. As I said, I don't give a shit but that his posts are defaming, slanderous, libelous and outright insidious. His high and mighty accusational tone is what is weird and strange. All I have done in the past two days is to delete letters of my name and project, and the old username that I was attempting to expunge. Why?  ""Such posting can cause offence or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia.""  ""Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia."" How is it vandalism to attempt to remain anonymous?! and to attempt to separate personal and professional reputation from libelous attacks?"
"  I want to see images of this sexy gender gap.  of Doom "
To respond generally to the statements made above: It's noteworthy to mention Tillman's religion in light of the controversial statements made by Ralph Kauzlarich, regarding the family's beliefs, and how it relates to the investigation of his death. Additionally (since this is apparently hard to find) the biography by Jon Krakauer refers to Pat Tillman as an agnostic and possibly even an atheist. I'm sure if someone wants to actually read the book, they can find a relevant quote to include. On a more personal note, this entire discussion topic stinks of religious paranoia.129.2.167.219
Also, could you share with everyone your IP address?  That would helpful.  I know you want to be honest about your ban, so just come clean right now.
Ok, well maybe Aaron, because I pretty much publicly pwned him, and I suppose this was his attempt to salvage some dignity ... or something.
Banana   Hi banana box here's the rear for you!!!!!
YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED BY WIKZILLA YOU TROLLISH BOOB
"  Response to your recent edit at Loyola Academy Having attended Loyola Academy, I think it's fair to say that the students come from Chicagoland. ""Northern Illinois"" is definitely misleading, as it suggests that students are commuting from places like Rockford and the Quad Cities.  They're not. (It's not a boarding school, or anything like that.) To my knowledge, there weren't even any kids from Naperville or Aurora. Chicagoland is sufficiently broad enough.  "
"   My reply that you have deleted in a fascist manner from the Nicosia Discussion page....l   Nicosia and discrimination against Greek contributors and the Greek character of the cityDear Salvio,  You have accused me of abusive behaviour against other users and consequently blocked me from editing the article on Nicosia for a 24 hour period.  May I draw to your attention that it is fairly obvious that those three users namely Seb az86556 , Seric2 and Chesdovi are clearly constantly creating a picture of Nicosia as a decadent muslim city that serves their religious beliefs and are all clearly hailing form Turkish backgrounds.  There is a constant undermining of the city´s Greek identity i.e. whenever a Greek flag appears in any single picture the aforementioned users delete that picture instantaneously and prefer to throw in pictures of the flag of ""shame"" and occupation that is equivalent to a legalisation of a human crime of continuous brutal occupation of the island of Cyprus by the Turkish army.  The Greek flag is OMNIPRESENT in the Republic of Cyprus whether some people like it or detest it but this is the reality and an Encyclopedia that wishes to be UNBIASED should depict the REALITY and not the subjective views of a minority of readers that are furthermore based on extremist religious and nationalistic views. On the other hand, such users do find it appropriate to throw in pictures using the Turkish and the ILLEGAL, yes illegal according to United Nation referendums flat of the non-recognised internationally illegal self-proclaimed state of the so-called TRNC.  It is totally UNACCEPTABLE to have extremist nationalistic individuals, that strategically reached the level of administrators, deteriorating all the time the article on the city of Nicosia, promoting an unrealistic Turkish character and undermining the Greek character of the city AND at the same time having an ADDITIONAL article on ""North Nicosia"" that is depicting a totally FALSE picture w.r.t the city. The TRNC is illegal, not recognised by any state other than Turkey and some terrorist states that are non-democratic and yet Wikipedia has a page on Northern Nicosia by supposedly administrators that support the unification of Cyprus. This is clearly a major distortion of their intentions and a huge lie in that an individual that pretends to be a neutral aribtrator and a supoporter of reunification cannot have a separate page on Northern Nicosia stressing how Turkish it is and then go and literally destroy everything in the proper page for Nicosia and emphasize the Turkish character of the city, talk about the tension and the division of the city all the time and undermine the Greek character.  This is clear nationalistic and racial discrimination against the indisputable Greek character of the area controlled by the Republic of Cyprus and furthermore it is downgrading for the Republic of Cyprus the mere fact that Wikipedia has a site that is CONSTANTLY vandalised by several ethnic Turkish extremists and Wikipedia users support such discriminatory behaviour.  In the light of all of this, I shall stop contributing to Wikipedia as I consider it downgrading for my own self. Furthermore, I do not wish to participate in an ""encyclopedic"" project that is totally biased and discriminatory.  Marcobadotti (talk) "
" Whilst I agree with Colonel Warden that ""fleshing out"" is a good idea, I guess it can't be done in an attempt to add significance that is not directly claimed by the WP:RS? Else that would be WP:OR?    "
":I think his/her efforts to stop edit-warring between you and me ""haven't yet reached a satisfactory effect"". That's because you keep following my edits, or checking my contributions page to know what I am doing or what I am not doing at Wikipedia. Unfortunetly, I'm too busy to check other users's contributions pages, I have better things to do with my life, and when I'm in Wikipedia I read articles, I do not read contributions page of other users.   I want to be far from this ""Ninguém"", I do not have time to play this game anymore.     "
Alain, thank you for the quick reply. I dídn't understand what you mean - do you plan to make a bibliography for each translator (too much work!) or simply order a list of major works that have been attempted by numerous translators, which is the system I am following now? My list of works is rather loosely chronological, and unfortunately focuses heavily on English language translators (since they're the ones I know best.) If you know famous translators from other languages, you are welcome to add their names to the list or to the Talk page, from where I shall order and add them later.   05:07, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
July 2010 (UTC)   Kindly quote me where I ever employed any ad hominem arguments, as opposed to addressing the facts and logic of the argument(s) put forth. You'll find, Wgfinley, you're unable to do so. So kindly refrain from suggesting otherwise. It's unhelpful. Cheers.   03:56, 30
Thank you for experimenting with the page /Irish Potato Famine (1845-1849) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding.
Gay Sex =  Demiurge loves it in his Irish ass.
Well if you are going to threaten me for my good faith edits of a Wikipedia article, I can guess where you stand on domestic violence. I've re-added straight facts from well documented sources. It will be curious if you or any other editor gives a reason for reverting this, as it conforms to criticism I've received. There is nothing that can be construed as OR or editorialization. Anyone can choose to take it to the Talk page. I see this is not the first time that editors have made efforts toward a balanced article.
listen dumbass i did`nt do any anything to the pelycosaur page so fuck you you cunt-gluzing asswipe
Red Range, New South Wales   I've noticed;  The permission for use of this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system (Lionel Hartley of [1]). Please contact a person with an account on the system to confirm the permission.  on the discussion page but how do I translate that into something meaningful? We've got clear skies now and we don't know how to cope. lol
Also, I see that you have experience with what it takes for film articles to be GA, so you may have already known about WP:PLOT and a bit of what I mentioned above in this section. Your editing to the Avatar (2009 film) article has been a little (just a little) to the contrary on these matters, though.   I do not mean to sound as though I am condescending to you or anything of that nature. I know that you do great work here, and I appreciate that.
using arguments based on
Real estate in Italy  Real estate in Italy  Why should be canceled or must have a consent an article that every nation has? the article still needs to be completed, with numerous art historical references, and current data, sales trends, and many other details. 79.50.122.82
So let's keep the change. Political correctness sparks more arguments than a word that a few feminists object to.
The US package does not include French text.
The second meaning (which I would argue is not distinct from the first) is not appropriate because it implies a value judgment - that what people want to signify is that they are in some way better than others. This clearly falls under WP:LABEL.
I refer to people's constantly taking the words of Jimbo as policy, the idea of removing any userbox with a political point of view is his point of view.  That's at the core of this problem, you did not notice that an admin skipped over the tfd process and speedied something when there is no rule explicitly against having an opinion in a userbox?  Rather, there is Jimbo saying there shouldn't be any.  I completely understand that he started this, but he is not owner of it, a foundation was set up, perhaps you've heard of it - the Wikimedia Foundation.  I didn't say you had that same point of view, I'm saying that I was just telling the people who do to fuck off.  I made no attack on any editor, that you perceive it as such is truly sad, but such is life.  Perhaps with time you will learn the intricacies of the language.  If one does not want personal pages on a site, one should avail oneself to modify the source code in order to remove them from the site rather than complain that they're being used.  People who overstep the proper bound of their position should die, that I have encountered multiple administrators so far doing so does lead to the desire to fuck off, but I'm not done here.
, such as a 2-3 month ban from Wikipedia. (You were warned 3 times!!)
I don't mean to intrude, but I have noticed the same, W.  There is a solution, but it's the baddest of bad words, on Wikipedia: deadlines.  The vast majority of words written by journalists and academicians weren't written because they wanted to.  Version 1.0 is moving along, and the Germans are almost ready to issue their printed, 50K-article, 1000-printed page Bertelsmann (Random House) encyclopedia, having been hard at work on the printed version since 2004.  Not getting a core of publishable articles on Wikipedia is simply not an option; it will be printed in some form or another, and as soon as it looks like someone else is beating us to it in this new wiki-world we've created, my guess is we'll get something out the door, if we have to hire content experts or translate the German printed encyclopedia to do it.  Every wikiproject should be thinking about these things. - Dan  (mistakes)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Easter Bradford
The summaries could use a little more fleshing out, although they should not be too long.
OK...cool...I didn't even know I was in there!!!
I agree.  It's a mail order degree.  That's why I asked about when exactly she got here ND, to make a water-tight case of it.
I got rid of them just after I messaged you.   (or Hrothulf) (Talk)
, and who, in fact, had not yet been elected
Sorry to be rude, Imsop.  I've got to run right now, but will provide a more courteous reply in few hours.   20:27, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Sorry, you need to quit your unconstructive reversions.  These are non-controversial edits.  If you wish to be an Administrator, I'd suggest using some actual discretion instead of engaging in edit-warring. 24.118.42.187
Other AE filing  I was a little disheartened by your participation  here. As a result of your comments made at the AE request, I feel the need to ask you a question or two. I'd like to do so here on your talk page, but I thought I'd ask your permission first. You might be busy with other things or prefer not to bother yourself with this request. Up to you. Thanks.
"   Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users ""Dumb F**ks""   Quote: To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors.   !!!!THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING!!!!  REFRAIN FROM DELETING THE TALK PAGE CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PROVIDING A VALID REASON OR BETTER TIPS FOR IMPROVEMENT. AFTER ALL THIS IS ONLY THE TALK PAGE  sources for the below mentioned contribution:   http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/  http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks  http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/  http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook  http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/  http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/  http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html  http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9  Other sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid:    Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks)  Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks)  Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks)  Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks)  Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks)  Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks)  Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks)  Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark)  James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks)  and many many more  start.  While at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users ""dumb fucks"". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:   Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard  Zuck: Just ask.  Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS  [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?  Zuck: People just submitted it.  Zuck: I don't know why.  Zuck: They ""trust me""  Zuck: Dumb fucks.  In another instant message (IM)  FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?  ZUCK: yea i’m going to fuck them  ZUCK: probably in the year  ZUCK: *ear  end."
Personal Attacks on Talk Pages   Please refrain from personal attacks on Wikipedia talk or user talk pages (like the petty and cruel attack that you left on my talk page).  It is official Wikipedia policy that personal attacks are not allowed (see WP:ATTACK).
"  Cleanest City - It is surprising that Trivandrum is 73 out of 250. But, that surely is not a good ranking. Like Aarem suggested, being in the Top 10 deserves to be called 'one of the cleanest'. Also, cleanliness is not just about 'clean', it is about pollution, waste treatment etc. I suggest that 'one of the cleanest' should be removed. Best Airport- I am not sure what this means. This tag was given well before the new Terminal was inaugurated. I cannot understand how one could rate the old TRV terminals as one of the best! If looks is the yardstick here,most of the airports have modern terminals now and we should wait for a ranking of all the new terminals. Also, the statement does not say on what grounds it is the best airport - in terms of - revenue, traffic, profits, passenger traffic, facilities? If you would like to retain it, please be more specific and of course have the references ready. Cheapest and Closest option - I would suggest rephrasing this to ""one of the closest options to Maldives and Sri Lanka and the only direct option to Maldives. You can always use a connecting flight is what I am trying to say. For instance, someone in the UAE can fly to Colombo and catch a flight from there to MV. - MountainWhiskey  "
Here we go again, same idiot reverting my changes in a pathetic attempt to make Filipinos look Hispanic.   PacificWarrior101
"  Well go verify it, ""Dick and Jane get sexually mutilated"" page 18.  "
do go fuck off bastard Do Yyou Have a life? go fuck off bastard and yank your cock through your ass. I hate you and hope you go away forever. lame is you fuck your mom. die die die and all that crap. this is for mahy mahonerz ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass.
Adding the Nazi party to Infobox politician under the heading Minister-President of Baden-Württemberg, which makes it look like he represented the Nazi party as Minister-President, may easily be interpreted as vandalism. The Nazi party does not belong to the infobox for very obvious reasons stated at the article talk page.
Freedom of Speech  The issue is not freedom of speech, which I uphold proudly, but child abuse. I have made it very clear that defending child abuse is not defending freedom of speech - to say it is is verging on nihilistic. It really seems that most editors here have a very naieve view on what constitutes freedom of speech.
"  I was just released from prison on December 18, 2009.  During the period ending about November 4, 2009, I engaged in a 101-day hunger strike.  (Actually, 100 and 2/3 days:  Started 221 pounds, ended up an estimated 171 pounds).  Generally, I drank two cups of milk in the morning, and drank water as needed.  I was never force-fed.  Nor, oddly enough, was I ever hungry, or in appreciable discomfort.  I was examined, almost daily, by prison medical staff.  Probably the reason that I did so well was that I understood that the most important thing is to maintain the body's electrolytes (calcium, potassium, sodium, magnesium, phosphate), and to consume just enough amino-acids to supply neurotransmitters. (If you merely drink water, after a couple weeks you'll lose enough electrolytes to cause an imbalance, and you'll feel terrible.  Most people attribute this to not eating, but I learned that it's actually due to the electrolyte imbalance, NOT the lack of calories.)  At the time, the longest hunger strike I'd ever heard of was referred to in the Capote book, ""In Cold Blood"", by Perry Smith, in the early 1960's:  93 days.  I could probably have gone two more months.       "
"  Image Tagging Image:Sangesar(A H)1.jpg   This media may be deleted.  Thanks for uploading Image:Sangesar(A H)1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.  If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use.  See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.  If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. —@ "
you   Do you know you come across as a giant prick?
"  ?? Most anarchists recognize the existence and differences between individualist anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists, collectivist anarchists, anarcho-capitalists, etc.  You are correct that most definitions use the word ""government,"" but you need to acknowledge that they mean ""state,"" and not simply voluntary governance.  IOW when people use ""government"" they mean ""state"" in this context.  See definitions above.  "
If memory serves, then his appearance in that episode was non-speaking and he was just briefly seen.
Iaşi's population The population of Iasi is estimated to be over 340,000, here are my sources:[], [], []. I would like to hear your opinions about this. Arthur 10 June 2006
My dad is 6'7' you dumb snail of a kid!
Unfair portrail of James Overall this is a fantastic film on Charles, but it sort of portrays James negatively as the few times he is on screen he is throwing a hissy fit. Is there any way we can mention in the article that is might be an unfair view of James? -
Where is Poland?  There is no reference to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (I added a couple sentences) despite the fact that the events were of great relevance to the Poles and several battles were fought in the western part of the country. The province of Silesia was ethnically Polish with German and Czech minorities, lied directly between Poland and Saxony whose king was elected king of the Commonwealth. A commentary by a knowledgeable historian would help: the country could field armies of tens of thousands yet remained neutral when its main ally - Saxony was being destroyed, while Prussia grew on the backbone of the old Polish provinces to attain the status of a major power.
"::Who's that? Isn't he our alleged leader who is allegedly interested in producing content?♦    "
Oh wait...never mind. It was you.
Saying that someone lies and then explaining why, is a personal attack??? Hypocrite and nationalist is a personal attack?? Besides, Mr. Arpad called others nationalists several times, why do not you block him?
Reigning Monarch?   I am by no means an expert on French domestic politics, but something tells me that Sarkozy should not be listed under category Reigning Monarchs. If somebody with admin status could rectify this I would be grateful. Thanks. 166.82.48.137
Japanese Second World War crimes Can the debatable information regarding to Japanese war crimes please be contained to articles on such matters. This article is about Japan as a whole and is not a forum on Japanese war crimes. If that is what you seek I suggest you use such forums available on the internet instead.
Are you speaking of this query? Thanks - ?!?
NUISANCE Hello there, just being a bit of a nuisance until I am blocked 86.165.205.22
. This site is not a list of who has been banned on your forum, by the way, so remove it
Hello, Your doing a bang up job at attempting to portray Professor Busby as a fringe scientist. I disagree with your changes. Oz
"  The WP:Airlines is only a suggestion, it is not policy. Guess what outside of your flight sim community the average user of wiki does not care about destinations and my edit improves the article and still allows people interested in destinations to click the ""show"". WP:AIRLINES is not policy, it is a suggestion. Maybe you should care more about the introduction and history section of articles instead of the destination and fleet size (both of which are to minimal interest to the average public) 76.19.222.40  "
" I appreciate your efforts but I have to ask, do we really care who plays him? He's a dog and sometimes an animatronic puppet. He's not in the opening credits so is it really necessary to list his name?  (✉) "
"   Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SFGiants   You asked in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SFGiants, ""Tradmark of what?"".  See San Francisco Giants, commonly known as the ""SF Giants"".  Note that WP:UN previously explicitly cited ""New York Yankees"" as an example of a prohibited username. tc "
" And I've left some advice and links. Btw, you did an astonishingly good job breaking down what was wrong with the edits to R&I; - that was a lot of work, and I thank you. I was dreading that when I got back today. Chihuahua "
" {{unblock | reason=  Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. The statement is not about content I've added to this entry- of which there isn't any to speak of. (I could have opinions and theories about his mother but I don't go around posting them).  Instead User:scray choose to post the following message and block me.  ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" This is equally as offensive as were the comments of the other editors- nor is the statement even true. You don't see much evidence because my properly sourced submissions are reverted. I ask you or any other editor to show me one misuse of a source. This is a a link to my last edit on the entry. diff  I include it as it was correctly sourced using per-approved sources that had consensus and the changes concerning definitions in the entry were discussed on the talk page and also had consensus.. Disruptive edit, not an improvement? That opinion is not supportable.  The changes were made to bring the entry into compliance with WP:lead standards because the definitions were faulty. .  Now I ask you (again #2), what content have I submitted on that page that had an unreliable source as you've alleged when blocking me? You have made the same unfounded accusation as the other two editors.  Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, keep that to your self! If you post a derogatory comment about me and can't back up the statement, you are lying too apparently simply in an attempt to damage my credibility. It is that simple. Now I formally ask you to Point out the reference are referring to in your negative posts about me!  This is not a difference of opinion.  It is a fabrication and a personal attack upon my credibility.  Comment on content, not on the contributor. You commented on both! and were not truthful in your comment about the content and sources.  Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor.  Instead, you added more of them.  In addition, for like the fourth time, this person decides to call me ""a full blown believer and pusher of this conspiracy theory"" which I repeatedly denied.  I took offense. Both other editors received talk messages from me. After you came along, One editor user: Dbrodbeck apologized for his statement..  I appreciate that and accept his apology and will tell him so when unblocked.  The other person user:Brangifer received a call for truce on his talk page but refused to retract his comment.  He has repeated attacked my credibility and now has thrown out a serious accusation without one shred of foundation or substance and banned me from his talk page.  His badgering continues on the entry talk page without apology or any shred of anything to substantiate his offensive comment.   To have User:scray come along and say stuff like "" Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, name-calling (a personal attack) won't go well.""  I did not call a name. I called a spade a spade and gave good evidence that I was calling it as it presented itself. I did not comment on his edits, I commented the fact that he did not consider my reference to  articles from the Washington post, San Francisco Chronicle, Associated press, and National archives of the Government of Canada to be reliable sources.  Unbelievably, you seem be echoing his position.  I probably won't post this elsewhere but if you can't show me an example of using a poor source on that page, it is obvious that you have also posted the same fabrication about me in reference to sources. Anyone who fabricates or perpetuates or posts derogatory information is a liar. Liars cannot be trusted and lying editors compromise the integrity of WP.  user:Scray said ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources.""  User:scray needs to show me where evidence was seen by him that had I based something in the entry on an unreliable source (#3).  User:scray  can not substantiate the posted comment the made. If you don't prove it with an example, then your statement is a lie. If you find yourself in this situation, then you are a liar and you have personally attacked this editors credibility. If that is the case, I'd
As far as I know the Macedonians were Greek. I didn't see this passage but I believe you. It doesn't alter the fact that Athens was the source though. Alexander himself had thorough Greek education.
I said I would do that, correct! But I notice the other party also did NOT do that. Innocent until proven guilty? Why do you take the side of the Wikipedian? It is simply because s/he has taken the time to register for an account? I mean, is that really fair? Until the other user states his/her side, can't we just leave it locked  or WITHOUT the offending content? It makes me so irate that I have to keep coming back to this page defending my thoughts. Can't you take a (neutral) side and decide for yourself what needs to be done, anyway?
Copyright issues  Please do not claim to be the author of works you are not the author of. If you continue to do so you risk being blocked.©
If and when a second season is announced, I would split that information and the episode list to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (Season 1).
"   Go to article ""Bayt Nattif"" at the article's Talk Page there     "
i lookd back in history when it was put it had link 2 extern gc site, sum1 removed that link so ur a fucking liar about no source.
Then who was phone??
please feel free to e mail me
Entirely correct per the source. Move on.   (send... over)
"  Nonsense.  The truth is NO schools give sufficient information about Anthroposophy on their websites.  But I'll challenge you to find some that do.  Not links to information - but actual information on the website.  I could easily take out the ""some"" and make the sentence a lot less weasly.  "
hay bitch   thank you kindly for your advice on my vandalism but if your the dick who removed the thing abouth Berties make up costs Thats true... so ah FUCK  YOU
Your happiness or unhappiness is not the primary goal here. Writing a reliable, trustworthy encyclopedia is. Currently, you're not assisting in that goal. In fact, you are inhibiting it. ???
"  Just my thoughts on itI doubt there is a definitive answer that would satisfy everyone, and doubt that it is worth he effort to try to clarify in any great detail.  In some cases it is probably appropriate, and actually used just like a surname (in a legitimate but different, broader sense than that used by our surname article, and including patronymics in Iceland or elsewhere) by the person.  That's probably especially true of radio personalities with an on-air name that is actually two given names but sounds like a given name and a last name (I've seen that happen quite often), and that happens with various other stage names and pen names that are derived from given names.  But as a general rule, no. Some like Ann-Margret make it clear by normally using a hyphen. The problem, of course, is that our articles, especially the stubs and sub-stubs, often do not have enough information to make it clear what is going on.  If it is ""Mary Lou""  or something of the sort, common combinations of given names where the second one is much rarer as a surname, especially if it includes the actual surname in the article itself, it should clearly be under M in any category (the redirect which should be there, or a dummy one if needed because otherwise it would be a disambiguation page, could be categorized if the full name were desired in some categories, and when that is done a note on the article page is helpful).  But in between, there is a huge variety that you'll likely get some arguments about no matter how it is done.  A bigger problem is people with full names given in the article name yet indexed under just the first given name in all categories, and there are lots of them. Even worse are those Easter egg sortings under some nickname which doesn't even appear in the article's own name.  "
It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about. It's Nuremberg in english. Not Nuernberg. If you can't get your arguement right, don't say anything at all.
Congratulations also from me for regaining the bit. It was long past time. (And the reason I didn't vote is that I don't frequent RfA nowdays. Sorry.)
Thanks. I'm not used to Wikipedia, lol. I'm usually making minor edits but I saw oddly there was no Catelyn so I typed it in and created it.  I still have to make some other adjustments like a reference heading, etc. . Talk
"  ""Since then passenger numbers have been in decline, due partly to rising fares and the lower value of Sterling, and perhaps also influenced by growing awareness of the detrimental impact that aviation has on climate change."" This is rather humorous speculation but speculation nonetheless.- t-c "
Questions and Answers
reply to Zebedee 2   Ok, I see your point, but consider this. Providing that you DID use the checkuser, there are 350 computers on the college ground that are exactly the same make, run under the same local network, the same IP address, controlled by the same Admin team, all users can be accessed by each and every computer within that boarding school, and each file directory and drives are shared. In short, the computers run in the exact same manner. Please, from an unbiased point of view, can this be the reason to why the checkuser was fooled?? And if you say No, then you are misinformed or lying, because I am telling you that I did not do this!!!! God, this is getting tedious now.    Also, Seb was aggresive, but was he reprimanded? No is the answer. And note that I apologised for that outburst-something that Seb failed to do.
(UTC)  [Scriptural Evidence] Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64: Sahih Bukhari [the most venerated and authentic Islamic source]
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).72.225.231.210  20:16, 26 July 2009
" Very understandable... thanks for the snack! ) 17 "
"  you're so immature and condescending, grow up! I won't reply or read your nonsense anymore but you're the one guilty of the 3 revert rule. mine was done to fix it, you went on another ip and changed it as did another editor. you can type what you want to make yourself look right but you're not. i'm going to go on all the articles I've found that list people the way it was on this article and remove it per your user name. gotta be consistent, right? i'm going on the [removed so you can't stalk me again] article and several others I found that have the same format and remove it all ""per hell in a bucket"". thanks for the tip, bitch! lmao at you cus you're ignorant and petty! 74.62.92.20  "
I KNEW they'd catch up with you Kizzle   http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20051026-071834-5487r.htm  Of course the Washington TIMES is the only paper to print this. We all know how the liberal papers cover for their own.  LOL!  Love,  Big Daddy  Ps Are all liberals anti-semetic perverts? Or just the ones who edit for wikipedia?
, appreciated. Some work has already been made so it should not be so time consuming... Thanks again. '''''' 20:41, 29
Every edit that user made was in furtherance of selling his DVD set. Using wikipedia for personal gain is against the rules. What part of this do you not understand?  What's up, Doc?
I did and do appologize for not seeing your above comments, but I will remind you that it is customary to continue the most recent discussion at the end of the talk page.
Im not posting their, he never provided proof or anything why not give him hell!  July 14 2006 UTC
"  Since I'm not this banned editor ""HarveyCarter"" this is all irrelevant. (92.12.20.168  )"
Well I pretty much agree with you except for the removal of Shadowcat. I'd rather stick with her than someone like Ghost Girl. Aren't we supposed to linger with the original characters first, then use up others?  (talk • edits)
Good luck with that.
"  I guess both memorials must have gone by that name. By the way, I read that there are soviet soldier graves in the background of the memorial, i.e. not under the statue, but either in the monument behind, or in th park behind that. (My German is a bit rusty, so I'm not quite sure what was meant by background"", any idea how many they are? Talk "
! ROBBIE MONCINO LIKES THESE KIND OF PEOPLE ESPICALLY LITTLE BOYS !
"I'm not sure that this section represents fact over speculation properly. Both of the section ""Discourages turnout and participation"" and ""Neutralizes turnout disparities between states"" offer a speculative opinion without factual backup yet their unabridged existence in this article assumes both sections to consist of factual statements. These should probably be quoted, sourced, or begin similar to ""Supports of the electoral college may argue"" or ""Supports of electoral college reform may argue"".     "
You should investigate the actions of Malik Shabazz. You know the reputation that Wikipedia and specific biased admins have concerning Israel and the Jews. There's no need to be intimidated by them.
2011 (UTC) I've changed it over to another free-use image. We did use a crop from the same base photo once before, but the crop wasn't very good - I've recropped, and tried to clean it up a bit. -   10:02, 2 April
":As far as 1, possibly.  If he's not had any involvement outside of that particular incident then we probably don't need to include his name - someone interested can always go to the source for more information.  Looks like you already figured out number 2 )    babelfish   "
I wish England won this war...   I'm thinking of an alternate history about the UK wining this battle. What would be the name and the flag of Santo Domingo if Britain was victorious?
I want to say that Berksguy is the one that is the kook.  He acts as if I am the one causing all of this.  When I do edits I use my login.  I'm not ashamed to back my views and put my name next to them.  However Berksguy needs to realise that other people out there feel the same way, and it is rather silly to think that every user that posts something that does not fit his agenda is me.  I do however believe that all of the actions of Mayor McMahon should be displayed good or bad if sourced and that includes his crazy words about supporting Illegal Aliens as was sourced.  George W. Bush, Robert Byrd, etc. have tons of sourced actions both good and bad toward those persons, and the same standard should apply to Tom McMahon. (}
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
" Thanks!  (talk • contribs) "
GlassFET maintaining false information=
Most popular shows   Thanks for giving the important and warning message. Squidbillies and Aqua Teen Hunger Force are both Adult Swim's most popular shows are both created by Dave Willis.
Furthermore, you are not in the liberty to strike my comment according to wikipedia policy. Only the commentator himself can do that if he wishes it. But, for you, If you wont stop your disruptive editing of freedom of speach, i will have to report you a second time. Please note that you are blindly engaged in vandalistic acts driven out of religious motives 77.248.185.98
"   Howdy   I see we have some common interests.  I remember reading of the cancellation of the Arrow in AvLeak when it happened. I was upset then, but had I known about the U-2 photos I wouldn't have been. No use for an interceptor with nothing to intercept.  My primary interest in Earhart is in the ""mystery."" I have arrived at an ""opinion"" which satisfies me, but not without much investigation and introspection.  I am a bit concerned when I see stuff like the outright assertion that radio communications were heard for days after she failed to land at Howland.  Although I was born in the first half of the last century, I missed the ""golden age"" though my library didn't.  I had the good fortune to talk to a number of the old heads and understand why some folks on the Earhart discussion page cannot comprehend the nature of the time and thus have problems with context.  I have been trying to get a feel for the contributors before I spend any time editing.  Most of my work on the Wiki has been on lighter than air and atomic weapons."
R&I;   Why did you revert that edit? 61.37.16.234
"  Meh. Anyway, no worries, South Korea is there haha ) !— (T2ME) "
"   And why is ""screw you, motherfucker"" a personal attack? I'm not implying anything about 80.174.59.92, am I?  76.210.66.152  "
Read template:infobox album, you're only supposed to put the earliest release date in the released section of the infobox. But it's not that important.  (Talk|Contribs)
Infobox changes   I warned you before that you shouldn't be changing infoboxes on people. Your changes to infoboxes, such as the one you changed on Christina Aguilera, are unconstructive. Aguilera is not only a singer and record producer. She is more than that. If you continue to change infoboxes to what the person is not, you will be reported to administrators and likely to get blocked.
Dead link   The secon weblink doesn`t connect.84.161.64.208
i know how things can be,i will wait till you give the word, thanks
i just got on here a little while ago i am looking for the Tennis player Giovanni Lapentti no luck yet but i will keep looking
" Re ""twats"" - no, it is not necessarily an attack; please hear me out; If I hit my own thumb with a hammer and shout ""twats!"" - is that an 'attack'? Of course not. As regards the BLP issue - it is absolutely NOT ""going overboard"" to remove someone claiming a living person has terminal cancer without any evidence - good luck trying to defend that action. Regardless of our 'disagreement', I seriously consider you remove that particular claim as a matter of urgency. And please acknowledge you're read this. 88.104.31.21  "
"  I've gone much further than that. I've rewritten the problematic last paragraph from: From 1942, Le Vernet became a transit camp for detained Jews.[1] In June 1944, the last internees were evacuated and deported to the Dachau concentration camp in the ""Ghost Train"". In total, about 40,000 persons of 58 nationalities were interned in the camp; mainly men but also women and children.[1] to: From 1942, Le Vernet was used as a holding centre for Jewish families awaiting deportation to labour and extermination camps[1]. The final transport took place in June 1944 and took the remaining prisoners to Dachau concentration camp.[1] One source says that ""about 40,000 persons of 58 nationalities were interned in the camp"".[1]    talk "
Comment from Kansai Goma   I still have more accounts on here which you will never find because I am too smart for you dickheads and you are a dumass.  fuck ya!
You are a n00b, stop fixing the crap that I edit.  I will call the authorities if these actions continue.  Go fuck yourself like the n00b you are.
this is a warning   no more hanky-panky mr. cranky-wanky! 77.184.28.171
New article wizard?   Hey Zman, per this discussion, did you at some point create a wizard to help with new article creation? If not you, do you know if anyone else did? I/we could swear we've seen this somewhere, but darn if I can find it anymore. Thanks!
A method for posting current events to the proper pages.
, 6 January 2013 (UTC)  Hi Prodigyhk. Could you also please add a few lines on what it means, so that it's clear for readers what the significance is?   11:14
Kirby | first=David A | year=2005 | chapter=Extrapolating Race in GATTACA: Genetic Passing, Identity, and the Science of Race | editor1-last=Metzl | editor1-first=Jonathan M. | editor2-last=Poirier | editor2-first=Suzanne | title=Difference and Identity: A Special Issue of Literature and Medicine | publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press | pages=184–200 | isbn=0801882052 }} {{cite book | last=
I just noticed that the comments were made a year ago. How bizarre of you to bring it up now...
GA article passed   Good Article criteria  Article is well written, comprehensive, and easy to understand. It is factually accurate and verifiable, sourced to (33) citations. It is broad in coverage, covering a large historical period, and was an interesting read I might add. It is neutral, representing data covered in a fair manner. It appears to be stable, with no major conflicts between editors regarding this article that I could find.   Good use of images, (9) images overall, and of those, all of them are free-use images, and not fair use.     Good job to all of the contributors involved.   .
About command of Broz and ethnic cleansing you must apprehending above statements of Ilario and mine: Tito's command expression is in foibe massacres too and ethnic cleansing is in see also section of foibe too! Your interpretation about optants is wrong because you ignore Prominent Italian historians like..... This article is simple an other part of same historic event of foibe: both were ethnic cleansing for prominent Italian historians! Your changes are POV very much because you are an admirer of dictator Broz and you are negative obstructionist. Moreover in my next change i approve your some words added in article to verify your real intention of neutral collaboration!
Guten tag! So I have just finished telling two other users that I have completed the promise I gave you and him, so now we can be friends again! It had to do with my past unintentional disruptive but nevertheless harmful tendencies a few months back, which I fixed. Right?   .
about AFD. They haven't been inviting me along.
This page will be updated shortly to explain the full significance and its merit for a full Wikipedia entry. Primarily, this merit is based on our client's requesting our presence on Wikipedia.
Ok then, hmmm... so how should one go about doing that, i mean, I'm guessing one can't just go around and edit something like that, you have to get permission or something, right? also does anyone have one of those comic book checklists where it gives you the order? -
From Six   Some of the people, places or things you have written about  may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects.   -
"::*The Three Stooges were also talented. And I believe they were as worthy of applause as ""Bang-Bang"", perhaps even more so.     "
The reason you want to full protect the article is because people are conflicted on whether to include references to death threats in the lead? Frankly, that's a ridiculous MO.
"   Badly written   ""School of the Air is a generic term for correspondence schools [...] The school celebrated its 50th birthday on 8 June 2009."" This self-contradiction is typical of the rest of the article! Could someone who knows about the subject maybe do a rewrite? ╟─Tag►duumvirate─╢ "
"::::: Do you follow the current scientific literature? Please try not to sound so ridiculous when you are accusing others. It has a bad reflection on your own comments:   ""Nevertheless, recent research indicates that self-described race is a near-perfect indicator of an individual's genetic profile, at least in the United States. Using 326 genetic markers, Tang et al. (2005) identified 4 genetic clusters among 3,636 individuals sampled from 15 locations in the United States, and were able to correctly assign individuals to groups that correspond with their self-described race (white, African American, East Asian, or Hispanic) for all but 5 individuals (an error rate of 0.14%). They conclude that ancient ancestry, which correlates tightly with self-described race and not current residence, is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population.""  "
Treatment of Jimmy Wales   Ronz, your treatment of Jimmy Wales by removing his posts here and the type of comments you have made to him in other places shows that apparently you think that there is no equal to you in the world of Wikipedia. What arrogance.
Please stop   I am a bit alarmed at seeing a brand new user charging around different articles issuing orders about new rules they apparently just made up out of thin air. I don't know where you got the idea that you could make up a new rule that all sources must be on the internet, but that is not, was not, and almost certainly never will be a policy here. And making edits like this, where you use your edit sumarry to issue orders regarding your new rules but don't actually make any real changes to the aerticle is not indicative of a user who is ready to work in a colloborative environment like this.
I forgot to talk about the example of the quarks. That one is only there for spectacle, to dazzle, but it has even less content than the others. That counter intuitive fact only relies on the ignorance on the phenomenon and the fact that the manifestations of the consequences of energy and mass being the same thing are not an everyday experience as oppose to the additivity of mass. It only show that intuition relies on experience. It is the same if I, that have never surfed before, try to surf. I can try to use my intuition all I can and pretend to be a jedi and use the force or the flow but I will not be able to ride a wave. Not until I have passed through the experience a number of times (although I am less hopeful in my case).
"==Notability of Thomas Dworzak==  A tag has been placed on Thomas Dworzak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.  If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.  For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.   (talk) (My contributions.) "
Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself!  Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself!
" See, thats funny. Mine photo had recognizable Jews who deserve to be there, but it was knocked out because ""there were no woman"". Know Wasserman or whatever uses my argument (""not recognizable people"") against Metzenbergs image. This photo is deffinutly to politicized, no enough real contributors (Writers, Composers, Scientists, Philosophers-and real ones, not cheap demogogs). You all judge by gender and by political views and not by real contribution and recognazation. You want to get woman in the photo, even if they dont deserve it and you put out those who really deserve it. Our people maybe has many great smart people, but from here i can see that unfortunately we've got much more not-smurt once. M.V.E.i. "
quit bugging me- why up on my back?
"  Quote ""Weaselly constructions such as ""the first to fly without a headwind"" and such should be thrown out.""  Do you want people to know what exactingly each inventor did for the progress of aviation or simply throw out any evidence that do not support your personal views."
How dare you send me such abuse you fucking cockmaster! If you dare warn me again, Mr Jeff. I will savagely attack your mother!  I know where you live
I oppose this version, as it doesn't justifiable present common usage in the international community. Like it or not, the United Kingdom is the realm most closely assocated with Elizabeth II.
I think IRISZOOM gets the point here .
If you want to describe the BNP as it is currently, drop the fascist rubbish
"   Threats  Please refrain from using threats to other users. ""A revert of this will take you directly to Wikipedia arbitration."" What is this? Mr. Oh-you-better-follow-what-I-do-or-I-will-ban-your-ass?  Don't be a jerk.    "
What personal attacks, whoever changed it back did only half the job, which is why I say it was done lazy. When it comes to stupidity, I am sorry, you are a stupid fool if you think New Mexico Terrirory and Confederate Arizona were the same country.
this user needs to get a life lol   lol get a real life u suck lol
Jewish propaganda existed for 3000 years. Though I'm russian I'm totally agree with Estonian guy. Lenin WAS jewish as majority of bolsheviks
REDIRECT Talk:The Massacre of Rabaa Between Narration & Documentation
" It is indeed the ""Evil Save"" that appears in Impossible, although it is only visible for a single frameafter killing the enemy disguised as the save point, requiring split-second timing on the part of the player in order to activate it. However, the only evidence I have of this is anecdotal, so I shall refrain from including it in the article until someone can provide more solid evidence. 137.205.108.102  "
November 2011 (UTC)   I have absolutely zero interest in being in the middle of this. Having checked Cung Le's twitter, he aparently has some issues himself with being displayed with a Vietnamese flag. As that is the case and he is a full US citizen I would rather create an exception for him than have to deal with  messy edit war. Besides, it sounds like he won't be in the UFC for much longer, rendering this whole issue moot as far as I'm concerned. Please help me take the simple way out and avoid a meaningless conflict.   05:49, 25
"  Going through a root structure to a concept/phrase's general meanings or putting a root word into a search box sounds like something I might do if I were perusing a dictionary to discover the usages and definitions and etymologies of words. In any event, if there are any relevant links on the ""Editor"" or ""Edit"" dab page, they can be included in the ""See also"" section here. Something I've already tried to do.  "
"  I think you're splitting too many hairs here.  It's very apparent that she and Summer are gonna have some business, and it's become obvious that she's graduated from from mere manager to a fighting diva.  People like Paul Heyman or Zeb Colter or Hogan/Lita/Gunn (Tough Enough) are there in non-physical roles, and are listed as such.  Lana has clearly made the jump from that status. Personally, I think the ""Other on-air personnel"" list should be strictly for those in non-physical roles.  Once Lana started throwing down with Summer, and it became clear that they're destined for a match, then Lana showed that she's above being merely ""other personnel"".  User:Vjmlhds [[user talk:Vjmlhds|(talk)"
sup   Thanks for the anal sex yesterday!  Love, George (your homosexual lover)
It seems that section was already accumulating unnecessary links.  But you're right, it's something that should be discussed on the talk page first, so I have undone my edit.
Entire Last Paragraph is supported by BLOGS, which are not reliable You need to go find reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources. Find some sources in the mainstream media. I'm sure this will be easy since the media is liberal.
(here's his profile stating it )
Phuu. That's warm. How do you cope?
"   Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Zacky Vengeance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) "
Shut up, read what I left on talk page, before you give me pure garbage, you are the one who is vandalizing everything by not fixing things the way they ought to be, i reject your reply fully.
"   Reversion to Talk:George W. Bush   I undid your restoration of the comments made in the GWB talk page. I do not believe someone stating ""I never liked Bush, but I love him now"" and ""Honestly, I never liked the guy. In fact, I despised him. But I have totally changed my opinion after he recognized Kosovo. Now, I love the guy. He is a true visionary and it took me so long to realize it."" has anything to do with the content of the page. Remember, talk pages are not for discussion of the subject of the article.  "
|decline=Please provide contact information for administrators at your school who will discipline the vandals appropriately and ensure no more vandalism occurs from this address. —
Hi anon, you probably know, that there were German speaking Moravians (ethnic Germans), so we need to differentiate. Names in other languages - we use all names, he use during his life. As he was working in Hungary and Poland, names in Polish and Hungarian are OK.
There is also a really exhaustive hardware report in a seperate html file I made. Maybe this is helpfull to someone? Maybe more tricks? Be aware that this file's size is 280kb, so be patient: Extensive Hardware report
This idiot graceful slick needs a friend to touch his no no spot 172.56.34.4
Stop deleting my useful contributions.
"  The article is mostly about the pound in general (with no mass/force distinction) due its historical treatment as a weight. Perhaps the numerous incarnations of the pound should be in a generic Pound article, and Pound (mass) should be in a similar category to any other unit of mass in a specific system (in this case the Pound (mass) is a member of the ""FPS gravitational"" system of units. There should be a link to the Pound (mass) article from the Pound article of course, but it deserves no better treatment than the lb (of the ""FPS engineering"" system). There is a table of the FPS systems at Pound-force and at Slug (mass) which tabulates various FPS systems. It's a little less clear than it used to be; what was simply called ""FPS engineering"" is now ""Engineering, absolute"", and the ""FPS gravitational"" system of units is apparently clambering for some credibility by calling itself the ""Engineering, gravitational"" system - which of course has no use in engineering due to its offence to Newton's 2nd law. Where did the gravitational system come from? Maybe some reliable sources are in order."
WIKIBITCH   YO LIL PUNKASS AINT SHIT OUT ON DA STREETS NIGGA
Population.   The Salem population is off about 2,000 people.
Title of article in English wikipedia   This morning, a wikipedian moved this page to a version including the full Vietnamese diacritics.  I just moved it back to the version without diacritics, for the following reasons:  this is the English-language article about Ngo; and the great majority of English text written about Ngo (and other Vietnamese generally) do not include diacritics.  In English, in fact, inclusion of the diacritics is of no effect (at best) or even confusing because they have no effect on pronunciation in standard English orthography.  (Please note I am by no means an English-language bigot: I am a student of the Vietnamese language, and understand the fundamental role diacritic marks fulfill in correctly differentiating phonemes in Vietnamese.  However, it is clear that in English, the diacritics play no role in pronunciation.)  The Wikipedia guidelines on naming conventions asserts that the most commonly used spelling in English is the form that should be used.  15:20, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
"   Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Moriah. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   (talk) "
One other policy I neglected to mention is the one on copyright violation.  Material from other websites, like the Institute's website, is generally copyrighted, and cannot be cut and pasted into our articles.  Facts and ideas can be extracted, but they must be totally rewitten in order to be acceptable for our use.  Even if you have a connection with the Institute, we would need them to explicitly release the material under a license compatible with our own licenses, and this would have to be done through official channels, not via casual discussion. In the meantime, please do not add any copyrighted text to any Wikipedia article. Thanks,
Functional languages: ISWIM etc.
"::I've been working in computers since 1980 at the industry level. Kilobytes are KB, Megabytes are MB, Gigabytes are GB, Terabytes are TB, etc. I've never been in any computer firm, be it a game developer, IBM, Apple, a movie company, or a technology company, that uses ""MiB"" or anything that kooky. In fact, my computer science professors will, in the classes I've taken, outright mark the paper a failure if anything but MB is used. Also, Kilobit, Megabit, Gigabit, etc. are as such- Kb Mb Gb, etc. The only place this ""MiB"" junk is used in in Wikipedia.     "
Why can't you believe how fat Artie is? Did you see him on his recent appearence on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno? He looks absolutely AWFUL! If I had to put money on it, I'd say that Artie Lange is a can't miss candidate for the 2007 Dead pool!        Keep your God damned fingers off of my above comment, !!!
"   Pi Kappa Alpha   Please note that you have both reached (or exceeded) the limits of WP:3RR on Pi Kappa Alpha. Please work toward a consensus before making further edits regarding this issue. Might I suggest a request for comments? -   "
But again. The Variety source is a reliable source (even stated again here) that, again per WP:V, will be used until a new or different reliable source comes around that says otherwise. -
Article for deletion: Gnaa, Nigeria   The article Gnaa, Nigeria has just entered its 3rd AfD. There's been considerable debate in the past as to:  Does such a place even exist?   If a place does exist with that name, is it notable?  Is this all a hoax perpetrated by the other GNAA, the Gay Niggers Association of America; they issue press releases datelined Gnaa, Nigeria.   I understand you have edited Africa articles extensively  if you get the chance, can you maybe take a look and render an opinion pro or con? Thanks,
"   The importance of Khalifman...and of Anand, Ponomariov, Kazimzhinov and Topalov...in being world champions during a time of crisis for FIDE...cannot be overstated.   They represent the rule of law  the functioning of the world title cycle  at a time when it was under direct attack by persons who viewed the title as private property, rather than as a sports title bestowed upon a player by a public cycle (as it had been from 1948 onward).  To say that Fischer, Kasparov or Alekhine were greater players...and therefore of more importance...overlooks this important aspect of Khalifman's title reign.   One could say that Fischer, Kasparov and Alkehine were stronger than Euwe and Smyslov, too...but that doesn't get us anywhere.   We don't rank US presidents by reputation  we list them all equally, yes?  Khalifman himself  in 1999 in interviews  said that although he was not the strongest player in the world (being 44th by rating)...he was clearly the world champion (having won the title in the open, public cycle run by FIDE).   That stand  that position  is what makes his title reign important.  BTW before anyone denigrates the ""FIDE Title Champions"" ...it should be noted that at least two could be considered super-GMs (Anand and Topalov), and that one (Anand) regained the title via the classical method.  Chesspride 66.19.84.2  "
" SandyGeorgia, FACs, especially ones like our last one that had all of Wikipedia's best writers commenting - tell us what we can do to improve the article. There are FACs that are longer than this article and WP:Size says to toss its instructions out if common sense says the article should be longer. Looking at the Catholic Church article in all other encyclopedia's, its one of the longest articles in each instance. Why are you trying to make this article into something it should not be - something that has no scholarly precedent.   '''talk "
" It should not be deleted, but fixed. North Kosovo is de facto independent from the Albanian-dominated government in Pristina, while other enclaves south are not. speaks "
I will be writing an e-mail regardless with all 3 of your user names in it. I am not a vandal. And I can call you a Nazi all I want, it's not an attack if I think highly of them. Actually it would be a compliment. 68.1.89.162
REDIRECT Talk:Chucky (Child's Play)
& is there a case to have the article protected against ideologues like Eleland who apply rules to suit their ends?
RE:RfAr   I wasn't asking because I wanted to know out of intrest, I was asking because I think it should be clear to ArbCom why you feel the other steps should be skipped.
"  I have indefinitely blocked you for repeated violations of any number of Wikipedia policies over many months and many blocking admins.  You show no signs of trying to improve, and even when given your final warning, just above, you responded with more of the same.  I haven't really been involved with you before and just kind of ran across this and realized, do what is good for the Wikipedia community ... enough is enough.   "
redirect Talk:Films that have been considered the greatest ever/Archive 1
I Know I kNow But I can't remember my password How can I login if people aren't e-mailing me my new password like there suppossed to.
"   Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika's second studio album   Hi ApprenticeFan. It may be worth taking another look at this, as the situation has substantially changed since you made your comment. Thanks.  (talk)(contribs) "
"  I'm not the Grandmaster when it comes to reading ancient Greek, but notice this: ""epi de Dorou tou Hellenos ten hupo ten Ossa te kai ton Olumpon choren, kaleomenen de Histiaiotin: ek de tes Histiaiotidos hos exanetsto hupo Kadmeionoikee en PindoiMakednon kaleomenon""-it looks to me that in both instances, he is indicating what the region is called, not the people. So it should be translated as the Perseus version indeed translates it. The region of Pindus was known as Macedonia, not that the Dorians were here known as Macedonians.  "
I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article User talk:67.170.224.208. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
Not sure but we have an image of the 1930 title page inscribed by Eliot at http://www.catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=14958  and Gallup's Eliot bibliography (A15) has the hyphen. The poem as it stands now was originally published in 1930 as a book and so the title could in quotes or italicized. I prefer the quotes but I'm going to revert the article so it is italicized simply because it is easier.
" Barnstar of Awesome   Barnstar of Awesome You are hereby awarded the Barnstar of Awesome for your amazing work adding published reliable sources, neutral and relevant information, clear formatting and beautiful images to the Wikipedia Adventure article on Earth. Keep up the stellar job you're doing. Yay you!   "
Redirect   If you feel your voice is not being heard, start a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. There the community will decide instead of a few editors.-
Well, this is supposed to be a factual article, similar to an Encyclopedia. This isn't up for debate. If ya want, you can post it in the Discussion thread, but thats usually used for devoloping the article's content and verifying sources... not calling it a waste of money, or racist.
December 2010 (UTC)  You earlier made the statement that you where busy for the next month or so with Christmas what other assumption should i make from that?    18:24, 18
Just to clarify. In a walk-over the race is held to have taken place. It just so happens that there is only one runner. In a match the forfeit being paid means that the match does not take place. A bit of a fine point, but I hope it's clear.
.  Thanks again for all your input
, 1 February 2015 (UTC) 92.96.190.168  18:13
Spoilers   I was thinking of adding information to this article, but so far I've been avoiding putting spoilers in it.  What do you guys think should be done about that?  I mean, I know Wikipedia policy doesn't forbid it, but personally I don't like coming on here to research a VN before reading it, and having to be VERY careful to avoid the spoilers casually placed throughout it. 65.78.144.186
LOL. Thank you, Alec.  | talk .
He started out British. Ended up Australian. By nationality. But, remaining culturally British, there is no way that Roebuck would have ever used the recently invented American term LGBT to describe himself. Nor should we.
Mexico a Regional Power?   I don't agree that Mexico is a Regional Power at least of Latin America, it could be a Regional Power of Central America, but nowadays it is considered to be part of North America. In the other areas of the world, the article is divided between East, West, North, South not between ethnic or languagegroups. If this was the case in Europe it could be considered, Latin, Germanic, Slave and even Anglo-Saxon groups. If we consider this, in the Americas case it should be South America and not Latin America. Second case, Mexico has a great GDP but in overal terms GDP is not the only factor, we should consider military, power projection and foreign policy. Mexico has a ridiculous military and projection power and politically is a subalternous nation to the USA  Argentina, Venezuela or Colombia have greater military and power projection capabilities, historically they have been much more interventionous and agressive toward other nations than Mexico and today we can see the same, specially in Venezuela case.   16:11, 13 May 2007 Personally I agree with you, but you need sources to say it. This encyclopedia is not a place for Orignal Research. Furthemore, editors have produced sources saying Mexico is a Regional Power of Latin America, if we change it to South America there would be no place in wich to put Mexico. Besides, Brazil's influence is not restricted to South America, it would not make sense to say it is restricted since the sources don't agree.
" No, we don't.  The name ""Ivory Coast"" contains only English-alphabet letters, and it would sort just fine in almost all cases where ""Côte d'Ivoire"" remains missorted, often appearing after Croatia, after Cyprus, after Czech Republic.  You can see this by looking at Category:Communications by country and seeing where the subcategory Category:Communications in Côte d'Ivoire is missorted (even though the sorting of the article of the same name has been fixed—can you see the difference in order?).  Or you can see it by looking at Category:Nations at the 2004 Summer Olympics and seeing where the article Côte d'Ivoire at the 2004 Summer Olympics is missorted. There are hundreds of those problems out there.  Why don't you make yourself useful, and go fix some of them?     "
"  The use of the word ""goal"" was merely an approximation I hoped would help the explanation. It's not currently used in the article. To explain this a different way: if you construct a scale with anything but a geometric sequence (e.g. an arithmetic sequence) the steps would not be perceived to be the same. If the perception of intervals was arithmetic instead of geometric, our equal tempered scales would be arithmetic sequences instead. -  "
" Rewired I see you have updated the security system. Nice. Is it a McAfee 2000?. Just dropped by to relate a little story I uncovered as I wandered here and there... There once was a little boy named Johnny who had a wonderful dog named Laddie.  Johnny was prone to emotional outbursts, and his mother was concerned by his overreactions. One day while Johnny was at school, Laddie was killed in an unfortunate accident. The mother took Laddie's body and put it in the backyard. She was very worried how Johnny would react to the news of his dog's death. When Johnny returned from school, his mother said to him, ""I'm really sorry, Johnny, but Laddie died in an accident."" Johnny responded ""Okay"" and went upstairs to change his clothers. The mother was quite surprised at the calm reaction. After Johnny put on his play clothes, he went out to the backyard. All of a sudden, the mother heard Johnny screaming. She rushed out to the backyard and saw Johnny prostrate over the dog's body and wailing. The mother said, ""But, Johnny, I told you Laddie died."" In between sobs, Johnny sputtered, ""I thought you said Daddy."" ``` Talk "
Im having problems with vandalisim
Dear Yono,   You don't need to apologize for anything, and you can edit any number of times you like.  I just want to know if there are any serious problems with that article, such as copyright violation.  If there are none, never mind then.  -)  Goodnight, and happy editing whenever you wake up. ;-)    04:53, 2004 Aug 30 (UTC)
You can edit your own article, under any account. Sock puppetry is deceptively using multiple accounts to influence content. Have you seen instances of that? If you've got a problem with the content of this article, address the content. Take your attempts to malign the subject somewhere else.
Wow, that's amazing.  I log on for the first time in months, edit an article and a predatory editor has me blocked indefinitely without an opportunity to respond.  Don't even get a chance to look at whatever evidence may have been fielded against me?  Why have I been associated with the various other IP addresses?  Really: what the heck?
Rao Jazib Saeed   Rao Jazib Saeed is a business graduate from NUML Islamabad native of Multan Pakistan.
And no, the workgroup was never created. Not enough people responded one way or another ( Maybe once we can get Shojo Beat and Shonen Jump copyedited and, hopefully, to GA, it will spur more interest.
or List of Deputy Lieutenants
"  The Ezekiel passage is quoted in the Moloch article in the 1899 Encyclopædidia Biblica as the strongest evidence for the theory that the offerings were considered to be to Yahweh (along with Jeremiah 7.31). Both passages are also cited in the Moloch aritlce in the 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia which reponds rather weakly (in my opinion): ""But this position is to say the least improbable. The texts appealed to may well be understood otherwise, and the prophets expressly treat the cult of Moloch as foreign and as an apostasy from the worship of the true God."" It is cited in  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica: Moloch] with the comment: ""Note, also, the attitude of Ezekiel in xx. 25 seq., 31, references which cannot be explained away."" The article The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Molech; Moloch] treats it rather strangely, remarking:That this prophet regarded the practice as among the ""statutes that were not good, and ordinances wherein they should not live"" (Ezekiel 20:25) given by God to His people, by way of deception and judicial punishment, as some hold, is highly improbable and inconsistent with the whole prophetic attitude toward it. It is not clear what this means, quoting parts of the passage and paraphasing part of it and then adding ""as some hold"". This article shows itself elsewhere quite aware of the theory that infants were sacrificed to Yahweh. It also brings in bogus Moloch-worship in connection to Carthage. Not a good article in any case.  Three different Rabbinical interpretations of the Ezekiel passage appear at . The interpretation by Rashi accords with the most obvious meaning, disliked by TRS, but the writer finds this inconvincing as not in accord with his own theology and prefers another interpretation. That would not be a reason to suppress Rashi's interpretation and the writer does not do so.  There is a discussion at  which covers in part John Day's treatment favorably but also discusses the Ezekiel passage in respect to the problem of the people's belief (and apparently Ezekiel's beliefs) that commands which Ezekiel saw as bad came from Yahweh. Note, John Day believes Moloch is not Yahweh, but that still does not answer the problems with that passage.  In short, the passage has been long used in support of the theory that the offerings of children lmlk was understood as commanded by Yahweh. It has long been in general a problem pasage. But those who feel that it is being misinterpreted do not suppress it. It is dishonest to present a theory that has been held and still is held and suppress its strongest supporting argument. On could respond by citing the Catholic Encyclopedia response (which seems to me weak). But add it with a citation if you will. But do not suppress.  The inclusion is not editorializing by me. I am presenting various theories that are held along with evidence for and against. The Ezekiel passage is cited as part of a common argument that children were sacrificed to Yahweh and normally used as support for that argument, indeed one of the main sources for that argument. My own POV, as much as I have one, is that the evidence is confused, there are good arguments as well as weaknesses in various positions, and that one should present all sides ... though of course full discussion would be a book length article.   Your particular POV on a Biblical passages is not grounds to suppress it when cited with a different interpretation, especially when it is normally cited in the Moloch context by sources usually considered reputable, sometimes very much supporting the POV that the sacrifices were to Yahweh. Even when when that interpretation is rejected the Ezekiel passage is still cited in discussion.  I don't believe that anything I have included in this article, including the Ezekiel passage, is non-standard for discussion of Moloch. I have tried to present the vanilla arguments and give enough information to allow them to be understood. One obviously cannot agree with all sides. Moloch cannot easily be at once Yahweh, an entirely different god, the name of a kind of sacrifice. Passing through fire cannot be at the same time a human sacrifice or an initiation ceremony. But people do hold different views and the task of the article is to explain these views and give their history.  It should be obvious now that your original feeling that this material was novel was incorrect. Please let the normal statements used as arguments stand, regardless of the positions.  I am restoring the passage with some reasonable weasel words to make it clearer that this is the expound
Okay so are we going to make another article about her disasterious life so far? Or do a better job at talking about in the article? What's going on here.
about ronald   explain to me how ronald being a happy clown is not legit.  isn't he not?  And might i suggest you change your name because when ever i say it i have to form a big ball of phlem or mucus to pronouce it correctly.
Should I have used arse then? 65.78.144.186
":::::::   The problem is that there isn't a great option that meets 100% of the needs. I've weighed between ""Biography"" and ""Life"" which are the terms generally used in these Bio articles and lean towards ""Biography"" because I don't think ""Life"" is accurate or precise enough and it doesn't have the complete etymological/philological meaning I seek. Biography isn't perfect, but I tend toward it only as the less bad option among several not-great options. I just know I can't stand disorganized biographies that aren't in one well-delineated section. If I better word that is more all-encompassing and precise it out there, I as a writer and lover of words have yet to find it. If someone suggests something better than Biography or the lesser word Life, I'd be open to it.    "
": I was just so frustrated about how I worked hard on an article to get it to GA only to learn that it partially came to nothing. I would never normally get ticked. I apologized and see my above info. Could you perhaps adopt me. Perhaps a restriction on nothing but articles and adoption? Like I said, I'm not perfect, but a 3 month block for a super rare attack, when I've been working hard with reflinks and I'm creating an article right now. Also, Soni knew I didnt mean it. I emailed him a huge apology for the message and a thanks for the adoption, but contrary to BMW's idea, he is taking 6-8 weeks off to refuel. Thanks Arctic and I'd love to be your adoptee. Thanks. '''''' (Chat • Count)   "
As most dictionaries point out, the two terms are synonyms and can be used interchangeably. Thanks to Finites who pointed that out, you can no push your POV on the basis of my poor English skills.
No i'm not wrong.  TANSTAAFL with subsidies.
" Apparently the Latrun people were bused from their village.  Not the Lydda people.  But Morris talks of people dying of hunger, dehydration and disease.  It is hard to imagine dying of hunger on a 10 mile trip.  One child fell into a well and drowned, while attempting to draw water.  Thus there was water on this ""death march"" of 10 miles.    "
Don't act OK. I know Sadasivan's works. His only ambition in his life was to degrade Nairs. What the fuck you think is the meaning of that passage? I am just asking you, if the word Nair came from the word dog, then give me a secondary source supporting that, other than that from the mental case Sadasivan.
" How is that a ""personal attack""?  You've just shown yourself to be a self-righteous, sanctimonious person now.   "
check that link Gyrofrog   http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/750478.stm  Even the BBC is not (extreame far right wing) as you you behave.
Definitely need to start a talk page for this one, i unfortunately don't know the specifics of Wikipedia but isn't there a request you can stick at the top of the page for someone with some expert opinion to edit this? It reads like an essay and is therefore pitched for someone at a particaulr level and is completely inaccessible as an introduction. In fact it's not introducing anything, it's just describing the features - typical bloody student essays, just like the ones i write so i unfortunately know the problems too well.
"   deleted part     Wll ryan we are aspie or aspergian. We have a more fundamental right to edit this page than you. it is like a white person telling a black person what civil rights movement is.     Joe Mele           Why so defensive? Please, I'm trying to work with you here. Plus no one has more rights to edit a page then anyone else. Is there something in particular that offends you about it? If so we can try to rework it from a nuetral point of view, but censoring it is not good at all.  T | @ | C          Sorry , But see the talk on the autism talk page. All right I will take it down a notch. Joe Mele           Thanks Joe )  T | @ | C               Please move this discussion to a user page for Joe Mele or relevant ip number, thank you.      26 August 2005          Excuse me but where is the love??? I am a little hurt - Joe Mele            It would simply be better to create a userpage and have discussions there.  26 August 2005         Deleting comments on your talk page        I should point out the wikipage wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes. This page is essentially a list of rules that others expect you to abide by. The second to last rule is relevent to talk pages. While it's not the case that you can never delete material from your user page it is not considered acceptable to do so to new comments. I wouldn't worry too much about undeleting the comments you have already deleted but I would ask respectfully that you refrain from deleting any further comments (especially those critical of yourself). If you continue to delete critical comments on this page you may find that others take offense in which case they may try to get you banned.  10:18, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)"
Your edits to Zodiac Killer article have been reverted.  Please remember that editors have spent a great deal of time to make articles accurate and truthful.  Your edits are disruptive and do nothing to advance the aims of Wikipedia.  Thank you,
Brokeback Mountain Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.   (talk)
Actually, if I can dig through the Wayback machine links, I think they do. It's a matter of manually searching through 200 pages, though, which I'm not going to get done quickly.—
"Wow. Somebody bolded one of his words to add emphesis, so you told him to ""calm the heck down"" and create a new section complaining about it. He isn't being hostile by bolding a word. I'm being hostile by calling you a faggot.  "
Actually the format of titling appears to be DL# on the cover in the orange bar at the top only. On both the cover and the title page:  Advanced Dungeons & Dragons         Dragonlance    Official Game Adventure   -       Dragons of Ice        Douglas Niles They are not called modules anywhere in the official titling though this term is still used to refere to them in Dragon mag and in each other, for example Dragons of Mystery page 4. I have no problem with Aerie of the Slave Lords as this is a clear title for this series that does not need to be distinguished from anything else. Clearly Dragonlance is not available, though if the modules had not spawned numerous other products it may be the title that would have been used. Dragonlance modules is not specific enough. I am still inclined towards DL Dragonlance modules. My second choice at this time is not on your list, but very  similar to some there Dragonlance modules (DL series). -
For example was the Expulsion of Germans after World War II?
jam your message up your arse wikipedia dickhead
Requested Move   Requested move  :Heinrich Pette Institute →  – Institut is German. It is located in Hamburg.     Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.  Discussion Any additional comments:
"  Hi , I think the  has suggested above that more references can be applied, and hopefully they can show notability. If I could just point out again my comments on the AfD, it is none notable because ""Little is known of the make up of the Trustees,"" and ""It is not known how the fund is financed at the present moment."" Could these two points be addressed first, thanks, 'fenian' "
WikiProject United States|class=Stub|importance=Low|TX=Yes|TX-importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Aviation
Methinks you should review some of your own comments then
Jack Breen is a 15 year old boy who lives in the state of NSW, Australia.  He is currently in year 9 at high school, and he is a qualified basketball referee and also enjoys playing basketball.
List of members of the Académie française does it by seat.  User:Docu
Oswah  the article claims he was born in St Petersburg and lived there until 11 -if that does not make Cantor Russian nothing else will- he was NOT German despite what that Great Beacon (?) of pop-knowledge Encyclopedia Britannica claims - the impact his Russian-ness had in having him and his work accepted by the German school is a direct cause of his later mental health issues - to deny that is fallacy and sweeps over perhaps the MOST critical aspect of his life - I do not need any source - YOU are my source - to claim he was German is wrong - period- I am a degreed Historian and Mathematician and bristle when I see such ignorant bias to claim him for Germany - he is / was and will always be Russian so call it like it is - not as the historical revisionist want to claim it - had he been any less successful I would most certainly expect German to disown him now as they did then - he is ONLY claimed by Germany because of the enormity of his work and impact it had on modern mathematics - something I in fact disagree with but get it right and PLEASE leave my CORRECT correction ...
Revision of Holocaust denial details   Hi there,  I had a closer look at the changes you referred to. I thank you for your attention, I went over the changes I had made and discovered a major error on my part because the Daily Express was not a tabloid until the 1970s.  I will amend the details and provide citations or links where I can showing how the headline has been (mis)used.  Part of the problem is that many of the comments appear on racist websites or YouTube videos associated with WWII
And THIS is why you don't list highly speculative ones!  I was simply referring to the common-frickin-sense category of actors.  Apparently, common sense you lack.  Tch, fuck's sake.  This is why people don't take Wikipedia seriously. Professionalism?  Professionalism my ass.  You cunts are the direct opposite of it.
Re: My Behavoir that day   Yes, I know it was a bit awful. But the bot probably didn't get the jokes I made in my poem anyhow.  I read Aristophanes earlier that day and was taking the piss out of the wikipedia system and taking the piss out of that dork there.  I don't really care about this wikipedia anyhow. I can make another one, and change my IP address (also I use my college computer and they cannot trace the network anyhow there) so I am alright.  )  Least you care )  Regards  PS I probably won't do that again. just pisses me off wikipedia sometimes.
Thank you for your help. It worked. Now the article has two lovely images.
Refs in Life History section   Fin, sei, and Bryde's are all baleen whales. The cited sources mentioning those species give age at physical maturity (20-25 for Bryde's, 25 for seis, and 25-30 for fin whales, iirc). Evans gives age at sexual maturity, duration of lactation and gestation, etc. for various species of baleen whale. Rommel and Reynolds give the estimated length of minkes at weaning. Go find the pages yourself.
can you...   can you inf ban my account? my friend somehow found out my password
Does the blocking administrator even disagree with the tags? On acetylene my tags motivated an editor to add more references, improving the project.
THis guy is REtired - Thank God   Just wanted to say, good riddens...
Vandals  How can I spot if a page has been vandalised?
"  We've already been through this before, ever hear of the Pokemon test?   Firemind ^_^ Pokedex "
Thanks   For fixing my user page and the Interdictor article.
You can find people with better grammar on Friends Reunite, but that probably doesn't apply to you as appear to be someone that doesn't have any social skills
i see you have been blocked before for reverting and that you have a history of getting out of line.  time to tone it down
How am I disruptive editing?  I am reversing it to when it was perfectly fine and only needs sources added. You are reversing it to where there are false quotes and false information added. If you are going to edit it do it right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kosta was born in America, however, like most Greek Americans, he was raised by his parents, both from Greece, as a Greek, which is typical in the Greek American culture.  Because of this, Kosta now has Greek citizenship, which therefore classifies him as a Greek citizen who in fact was raised as one as well.   end of discussion.
The result of the bout has been changed from a KO win for Toney to a non-contest by the California State Athletic Commission!
The fact that Azeris are mixed Turkic speaking people that sprung from the Turkish invasion points to the fact that they did not just appear.  They were and are in the location that was Arran that consistent of Albanians, and Iranian tribes.  Furthermore, the fact that the entire area was called Arran, then for some reason was renamed Azerbaijan is another indication that Azeris were not a Turkic speaking group that just living side by side in the Caucus next to the Sakas.  No one said Azeris in the north do not have differences when compared to other Iranians, in fact Iranians are a multi-ethnic, multi lingual group, much like the Kurds in the west have a different language/customs, as do Balochies in the south.  What happened to Iranians in Arran intermittingly, in which the Turks invaded their tribes, and the Albanians were driven out, and imposed their language on them via Elite Dominance, does not change their original ancestry.  You have again failed to give a single rationale as to where the Azeris came from, why they even appear/are part of Iran, even today, and why these ethnic groups even have a Persian culture?  In all, you can concentrate on their differences, but fail to explain where did Azeris come from?  It is astonishing how some choose to skip many important facts, and write pages of texts about Germanic peoples in an article about Iranian peoples.   I think I’ll stop at that.
"  Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  e (Talk) "
read this..   im gonna troll you forever and ever and ever, and nothings going to stop that.
"Yea, actually I am pretty lazy, that's why today I wore a shirt that said ""The top ten reasons why I procrastinate. 1)  "
"   More copyright problems   I have just deleted IPhone OS 2 and IPhone OS 3, as they were clear copyright infringements. Also, looking at your editing hsitory, I found that at least two other articles that you created, and that have already been deleted for other reasons, also infringed copyright. In all cases, I found that you had posted text which was word-for-word the same as text in other sources which already existed before you created the Wikipedia articles in question. It is unacceptable to copy material from elsewhere, unless there is proof that the content is either in the public domain or licensed under a free license compatible with Wikipedia's terms of use. I hope you will make sure that you don't copy content from elsewhere again. The editor who uses the pseudonym """"  "
well I'm going to focus on content and just leave it at that.
Keep your distance far   From Abdul and Omar! 86.181.0.14
Damn   Damn, I'm a vandal and you're reverted like 50% of my edits in like 2 seconds! I might have to retire LOL!
Congress gets involved the same way as it does with most any military purchase, they control the money which is appropriated.  Granted back then the various service secretaries had more lattitude than now but Congress often got involved.  Needless to say that organizing and maintaining an armored division is expensive enough Congress would have to be involved.   )0:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
i dont know, but i have heard me has also conerted to islam
Since ethnicity is hot-topic for greek editors, it shall be separate not to disrupt the whole text.
her!  Poop, pee, toot, fart, gas, diareah!  Zoey is poop. She stinks.  I want to marry you baby! Call me!
Editing pages   To anyone who reads Dmacks' talk page you will now how that there is only one person entitled to an opinion and that is Dmacks.  Hopefully he wont read anything you edited as he will just change it back.  He is very arrogant.
no   either way just go bother someone else
"   Unblock Request: Fuck you, unblock me!   {{unblock|HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA UNBLOCK ME OR I WILL VANDALISE MORE!!!!  It had been six years since we had graduated from college, and for the first time since graduation, all three of us were together again. From the enthusiastic hugs at the airport and then the conversation and laughter during the dinner we shared at a local restaurant on the way to my home, it was clear that while plenty of time had passed and we had kept in contact, the comfort and attraction between the three of us when all together in the same physical location was still undeniable.  Having returned to my cozy, semi-secluded home in the suburbs, we all sat in the living room, sipping wine and continuing the tales of our lives. With the exceptions of the location – a house – and the presence of alcohol, it could have been any of our final two years of college together: The three of us, tight-knit friends-with-benefits, sitting and chatting and sharing a drink together. Then, Justine and Beth had been roommates while I lived in another dorm across the main quad; now, they were much-welcomed guests who had fortunately been able to clear time in their hectic schedules to come and visit me for a weekend.  As I sat in the recliner and took another sip of wine, I allowed my eyes to truly linger on Justine as she told Beth about a recent situation at work. The Florida sun had certainly added a glow to Justine's skin, and may have also been responsible for the lighter shade of her shoulder-length brown hair. As when we were in college together, she wore virtually no make-up, just a thin gloss upon her lips – an enticing strawberry flavor, as I had discovered upon meeting her at the airport earlier in the evening – and red fingernails. Her red dress was indeed elegant, with a plunging sequined neckline that permitted a very welcome display of her cleavage, a display which Beth and I both certainly appreciated. The long slit up the skirt of the dress revealed that she was wearing stockings held up by a garter belt, one of its descending white straps definitely noticeable against the well-toned thigh. The red heels provided enough of a contrast for the white stockings to truly attract the eyes. Surprisingly, however, she wore hoop earrings, something she had never worn during college for fear that they would pull at her ears and widen the piercing holes more than was considered safe.  The conversation turned back toward me, but a few minutes later, the two beautiful young women were again chatting primarily to each other. I took the opportunity to once again study Beth, and was equally impressed. While noticeably shorter than Justine, Beth was also paler in complexion, a testament to living in northern Canada ever since graduation and spending virtually every waking moment inside to conduct her research. As in college, Beth preferred the color black for her outfits: a somewhat-tight sweater, form-fitting slacks, and a pair of low heels. Four tiny earrings adorned each ear, plus she bore a small sparkling stud against her left nostril. Beth's black hair flowed over her shoulders and down her front, and she absently twirled several strands around a finger as she listened to Justine.  It felt so good to be in their presence once again. Especially since all three of us had been in several failed relationships since graduating from college, I was thankful that I had thought to invite them to spend the weekend with me. I had absolutely no doubt that our chatter would eventually give way to intimacy, but for now, I was quite content to simply sit back in the recliner and openly admire the two stunning beauties perched upon the sofa.  The intimacy began when we finally went to bed... together. I was on my back under the covers, with a very feminine head resting softly upon each shoulder. An arm wrapped around each of them, I held the two women close to me as they absently stroked my bare chest, dipped a finger into my navel, brushed my thighs through the sweatpants I typically wore to bed, caressed my stiffening manhood. My eyes closed, I reveled in their touches: inherently familiar, yet full of rediscovery due to the lengthy passage of time.  No words were needed. And as their hands occasionally made contact with each other upon me, I smiled to myself in the darkness, having always enjoyed watching Beth and Justine in their own intimate encounters. But eventually, their touches slowed and ultimately ceased, their breathing falling into the regularity associated with sleep. I stayed awake a little longer, immensely enjoying the closeness with two of the people who had been most important in my life.  I awoke in the morning to the scent of French Roast coffee, faint yet unmistakable. Justine was gone, clearly the one who had brewed the morning nectar, while Beth and I held each other as sh
Current thinking  One line of thought is that 'paraphrenia' is basically a psychotic illness (e.g. schizophrenia). The differences (e.g. preservation of personality) are simply due to the fact that the psychosis starts later, and so the person's personality has already formed (v.s Schizophrenia which often starts early, and therefore disrupts personality development). I don't have a specific reference for this but might look for one at some point!
Why did you delete the Harry Walther article?   I'm very worried about this deletion. Walther is one of the only voices preaching the truth about Jesus's message.
Trying to find official synopsis to add to the plot section
"There's a BIG difference between that stupid thing you just falsely put on my keyboard and this quote: ""It explains that there's the difference between text-only 'eBay' and the actual logo that's more like 'ebay', but also the distinction between that same lame text-only 'eBay' and how it used to be styled, which was ' 'ebaY' ''' until late 2012."" "
"   Heyyy Tyler hun! )     How are you, my dear Tyler? I was begining to wonder if you had received it - glad to see you did! Seeing you drop by my talk page has cheered me a lot, so here's a small kiss to repay that joy ;) *smooch!*   ♥ tell me -  "
Disambiguation Page  Does this need a disambiguation page? I would argue that the other Billy West is not prominent enough to cause confusion. There is not even any article linked for him, and the Primrose article is pretty minor.  First, I moved this to the bottom of the page because that's where people usually expect new material to be. This way people looking will be more likely to see this question, no biggie. To answer your question; no, I don't think this really needs a disambiguation page for the same reasons that you listed.
Lol, my major issue P:))  спойт
hi. this is a place where you can leave a message for me.
Thanks for the praise.  I'm taking Wikipedia a lot more seriously now than I used to.  I have to admit that a few months ago I did silly things like vandalize articles.  I never really didn't anything slanderous, just silly and stupid stuff.  Recently, I've been doing my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia and I've even been correcting the same sort of vandalism I used to take part in.
"  Reply from ColonelHenry I have been pissed this week, I admit. Why?  First, last week, I get harassed by one hypocritical ""rule nazi"" editor taking things too far (SummerPhD) so when I pointed out her similar shortcomings and intransigence and said frankly ""this user is an asshole"" and explain why and state ""this is the kind of user that drives editors away from wikipedia"" I get blocked for 24-hours.  I say ""asshole"" once, I get blocked.  She calls me a ""dick"" over a dozen times, and gets warned.  Go figure. I hate nitpicking rule nazis because they end up proving themselves to be hypocrites, and unfortunately without fool other meek fools who tend to be admins tend to side with the rule nazi.  In the midst of that Daniel Case continued to plow ahead insisting on a rushed revision of ALONJ that no one else raised as a concern (so, not immediately dire) after being asked first politely and respectfully several times to ""wait until after TFA"" and he still ignored it.  If someone politely asked me to wait a few days before doing a drastic edit on an article they worked on that was getting a little attention, I would...because I find it akin to telling a concert pianist to change their entire concert programme an hour before the recital. Only when I responded in anger did he pull back on the reins and realize ""hey, maybe I should wait till after TFA.""  A little deference on his part would have gone a long way.  I'm not averse to his edits, but seriously, after TFA would have been more than fine.  I considered it insulting, and his refusal to listen to a polite request stated by both myself and the other major contributor to the article was considerably disrespectful.  And then when the article I've worked on becomes TFA we get inundated with constant vandalism and petty edits that were not necessary (i.e. people like you, Kevjonesin, insisting on 19th instead of nineteenth).  Is that really a necessary place to make a stand and pick a fight? Seriously, don't you have better things to do with your time?  I'd rather argue over an analysis of Hegel's influence on Nietzsche's ""Will to Power"" or Hindu mysticism in Eliot's Four Quartets than bicker about things as meaningless as whether honour should be spelled -or or -our.  As for why, I like ""nineteenth"" as opposed to 19th, several style guides (including Chicago/Turabian) advocates it, and growing up I was taught that all numbers under 20 should be spelled out. Whether cutting two dozen letters from an article going to 19th and 20th is going to make a difference for ""brevity's sake"" on a 40-page article, is a lame claim and frankly a waste of time for both of us. I like the aesthetic of it spelled out, it's allowed, and the option of spelling it out is a bonus in an article to avoid confusion with too many other numbers.  When considering such an unnecessary subjective edit, deference should be made to style set by the editors who spent months on an article...and when nothing is wrong to it, deference is entirely warranted.  That isn't ownership, it's just courtesy and good judgment. After all, if I stood in your yard while you were painting your house gray and proceeded to insist you to paint your house orange, you'd tell me to ""kick rocks.""  As far as I'm concerned, this is over. Move on. I am not addressing this any further, because nonsense like this keeps me from contributing and convinces me to leave Wikipedia again, and this time for good. If Hell is other people, Wikipedia constantly proves itself to be the eighth and ninth circle.   "
Al Wistert was inducted into the Eagles Honor Roll yesterday.  I don't have all the details, but someone should write this in.
Wow!!!! Instantaneous response. Obviously not spending an evening with the  girlfriend .... bet you're free pretty much every Saturday night too, eh fellah?
"  I've changed the status of your case from ""Open"" to ""Under Investigation"" as I familiarize myself with the case... and as you probably know, this is a -very- involved case. I'm almost finished reading through all of the material and consulting with the other Advocates who were involved. Once that is finished, I'll be able to go over with you the pertinent points that I feel need to be addressed for my better understanding, and then go over what you wish to get out of Advocacy. I'll be in contact soon. אמר  (/AMA) •  "
" And by nailing Philippa Gregory to the wall a 1000000 times!!! Feudalist  "
propfan MD-80   I read that during a period of unusually high fuel costs, MD built one -80 with propfan engines (these look like turbofans, but with a propellor attached to the rear; they are known for their effeicency). After some initial hype, no orders came, and the model (I believe it was a one-off, more of a demonstrator than anything else), was scrapped. There has been intermitent talk of using propfans on civil aircraft since then, but it has not come to anyhting.
I already did so by taking a Wikibreak, as per step 2: Disengage For A While. I note with grim certainty that Striver and his POV-pushing colleagues have done no such thing.
"  Come on  and others so defensive of this article, how about working toward making it a real GA article? It will require a bit of an attitudinal shift for some, but I suggest removing most of the fanzine hearsay gossip about Barrett's behaviour when he was ill would be a good place to start. I would start doing it myself but the organised ""ring-in"" resistance I encountered last time deters me from bothering.    "
"  Hilarious, Islander. You undo my evil, uncivil language (like it matters to anyone) but you leave the cowardly, bad-faithed and wrong accusations against me in place. Makes me feel real good about your judgement in indefblocking me. Sorta. Everyme "
"   Sociology   I hope I'm in the right place. I'm a newbie.  I've worked quite hard at editing the badly needed ""Sociology"" page, but am having trouble with using links. Please help.   Also, given the changes to content and context where I have clarified information and removed value ladden dialogue with whom do I discuss removing the: ""Clean up"" ""Editing"" and ""Tone"" warnings on the page? At present, it has been revamped, but the discipline is vast. I will add more as I progress and continue the edit as time permits. In the meantime, it would be nice for people to have a sense of confidence when reviewing the material now.Sociologist4life   Check out my edit of the ""Introduction to Sociology"" in wikiversity that I created, if that helps. At the time, I used Aresthusa as my handle.  Thanks!"
I fully acknowledge that I made a mistake.  My apologies.
Point taken.  But Keeper, you are the one who originally admonished me for getting involved in issues that I was not directly connected to.  Islander and I have our own history. It looks as though, had you not responded - I'd be listening to crickets here; as Islander is sticking to his normal communication pattern.  So, in that - thanks.  72.92.4.157
Reverting Do not revert an article more than three times in 24 hours. It is against wikipedia policies, see Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule
This is my talk page for anyone who wishes to send a message. I appreciate them.
"  (1) Please remain civil.  You may have a personal relationship with the subject, or have personal reasons for supporting him, but taking personal offence on his behalf isn't useful to improvement of the article.  (2) You keep conflating my changes with those of someone else.  The use of the word ""caused"" appears to be the major source of your dudgeon, and I didn't make that change.  You keep reverting all changes wholesale  including changes made for reasons purely of style  rather than picking out the ones which are bothering you.  (3) We have no proof that the documents are ""sensitive"" or that Bradley Manning is responsible for anything at all, since there has been no legal action.  You complain about BLP, but accepting claims about Bradley Manning's guilt in the matter of a serious criminal offence are an extremely serious BLP policy violation.  Until the claims of Lamo and the US government have been established in a court of law, we CANNOT use the word-of-God to state their claims are true.  As for the torture citation, if you read the article (and many others also easily obtainable), you will see that it's the newspaper which chose to put ""torture"" in quotation marks, not the experts they consulted.  We are not interested in the editorial opinion of the newspaper, but rather the opinion of the experts whom the newspaper has consulted  who clearly states that Manning's treatment amounts to torture.    "
I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us.
"  see the talk page. OTRS is slow indeed ). For everyone, I have a very intermittent connection at the moment and will not respond swiftly to queries. I'll try to avoid admin work meanwhile. My apologies.   talk "
" I'm not. I was responding to your phrase ""locomotive superheaters vs. compounds"".   "
"{{unblock | I am appealing a 48-hour block that was placed on me before I could post my response via the administrator's message board. I apologize in advance for the length of this but I believe that it's necessary to include all of these details. I wrote a summary at the end so that administrator's could get an overview if they don't have time to read the whole statement.  I will be addressing the claim that I violated the 1RR rule in the second paragraph of this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Shapira  According to WP:BLP, ""Biographies of living persons  must be written conservatively and with regard to a subject's privacy...""  In a book written in a foreign language, with a lot of jargon, there are often competing translations/interpretations. And a book written in such a hotspot is sure to generate numerous quotes, misquotes, dubious translation and out-of-context statements. As per WP:BLP I think it stands to reason that a more conservative and less sensationalist translation be used, and for the same reason, the quotes should not be taken out of the context that the book uses them in.  With than in mind on the 18th of February, I improved certain parts of the paragraph in question in order to make to make it more compatible with WP:BLP based on this source.  user:Zero0000 -  responded to one of my edits by stating that [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yitzchak_Ginsburgh&diff;=538816167&oldid;=538810305 I ""can't read.""] And in what seemed to be extremely inappropriate comment for a Wikipedia administrator, told me in as many words to get off Wikipedia.""Take a break"" I didn't take nicely to being told that by an administrator and thus began a heated series of exchanges during which I was told by said individual that I had ""behavioral problems."" Said individual also decided to respond to my comments by invoking what seemed to me to intimidation tactics ""I started to write a complaint against you"" (why do I need to know that? He can let me know when he posts it) and then later responding to another edit he didn't like by saying that ""it was on my charge sheet.""  Now the reason I am writing about the behavior of said individual is to give some context or the 1RR issue: After posting my version of the paragraph, user:Zero0000 subsequently changed it to this.  I will post only the first few words of his statement and the source:  Source: ""There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side""]  user:Zero0000: [""Babies [on the enemy side may be killed .""]  After those first few words, user:Zero0000 continues quoting the rest of the paragraph. Now at best this is a serious distortion.   And when you consider that article is dealing with a scholarly work which contains hundreds of sometimes competing, sometimes contradictory sources, rationales, theories, proposals, and ideas; many of which are subsequently discounted, limited in scope, or just tossed by the wayside, the disparity the statement ""may be done"" and ""there is a reason"" is even greater.  Aside from the distortion mentioned above, in contradiction to WP:BLP user:Zero0000 also opted for a particularly liberal out-of-context translation.  Why did user:Zero0000 replace my edit with his own. His statement: (prefer source with an actual quotation)  As I showed above, he didn't use an actual quotation.  Furthermore, after seeing his comment, I searched but wasn't able to find any Wikipedia reference to a such a preference, leading me to believe that he was intent on just superimposing his own WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT on me without explanation.   His actions above combined with the general hostility cited above led me to be believe that this was another front in the multi-pronged campaign of intimidation that he was engaging in (i.e. encouraging me ""take a break"").NEWLIN
"  I think the possibility of a corrupt core of admins is a problem worth asking candidates on. So if anybody else posted this exact question there wouldn't be a problem with it? Particularly, I imagine, if it were a well respected admin with an impeccable record positing it?  I read each of the candidates statements, and used that to judge if this question would be useful, look at the time between asking the candidates questions. Also look at the ""ignore all evidence"" question, this occurred to me as I was going along and it must be regarded as a general behavioural question when linked to the ""5 days"" question, plus this shows it was not a ""spam"" question to all candidates, I did pay attention to their statements.  This is the question I posed to select candidates. What general concerns do you think are raised by the 5 days of silence from the community's admins in this ANI? Are there any other general concerns which arise from the ANI?  Do these quotes;  ameliorate, add to or amplify concerns?  Do you agree with the substance of the Jehochman quotes?  If an essay WP:IGNORE ALL THE EVIDENCE were written, what concerns would be behind it, and what could be done about them? If you can point me to another ANI where lies and deceit by two admins within an ANI were ignored by the other admins in attendance for somewhere close to 5 days, then I will ask exactly the same question of those select candidates, substituting this with that example. Would that be acceptable?  Have you seen such examples of systemic corruption before? Or is this the only one? Of course to answer that you would also have to answer; can you say in all honesty that you think Ruslik did not lie in this ANI? If you choose not to answer... is it because you believe it is the moral thing to do, or because of possible intimidation or repercussions on your good self?   "
Adam Bostick   Was the Adam Bostick image tagged for fair use? If so, for how long?
The article is NOT about the afterlife. The afterlife includes several parts: life in the grave, the day of judgement and then life in paradise or hell. This article is only a survey of the Muslim narrative of the Day of Judgement, not an article about the afterlife in general.
"  Thanks for your work on this ... by the by, when you revised your closure remarks, you said you moved it to ""California Adventure"" instead of to ""Disney California Adventure"", as you did and as was the consensus in the discussion. Minor detail, I know. I'm tempted to fix it myself but was afraid I'd be stepping on toes.  AU93 "
Inaccurate information Removed a section which claimed that Denning's novel Pages of Pain inspired the Planescape: Torment game, which is definitely not the case. Both have an amnesiac protagonist and that's about it. The novel is about the Lady of Pain and her background, whilst the computer game has very little to do with the Lady of Pain at all. Chris Avellone and none of the other Torment writers have mentioned the book as an influence at all.
|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here: I was unfairly blocked by a groupf of provocateurs
Cease and desist   You must refrain from re-adding vile language to my talk page from hostile editors.  To not follow my request, is to indulge the trollish remarks.  If you delete this too, then you are effectively one-sided and bigoted.  Please leave me alone and don't take sides.  Don't vandalise my talk page with nasty comments.  I ask nicely.
"  Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!    melmac "
I asked him for help. He could help. Because another person blocked me for an unknown reason68.100.166.227
Dennis, I have not been posting as an IP. Your statement is again the misleading and I think you are well aware of that since I have explained exactly what happened. A number of times going back many weeks I have been logged out of WP for no reason known to me. I have then logged in and identified myself with the comments written as an IP. I feel threatened by your writing that you can find my hometown using my IP. Is that what you intend?
"  The phrase ""became critical"" was an older version. The current version does not have that specific phrase.   "
, 6 January 2008 (UTC)  That is indeed, fairly precisely, the position of some monarchists, as well as reasoning of some jurists and scholars, to this matter. Which then means that it would be POV to erase Carlos Patrick from the article, as there are at least as good reasons for his legitimacy as heir as to those of the other Hohenzollern line.   14:56
"  See in my userpage the Articles I've created and Articles I will fight to take them into GA sections.   [zootalk] "
"  Response to AN/I The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ""real girls have vaginas"" could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. _friend "
|rationale= I want to get rid of my account but am currently blocked from editing my user page so I thought the talk page would be the next best thing
This week's issue of Music Week has their surnames down as Stephens and Meads.
"  Kim Fowley Hello, again! I noticed you edited the Kim Fowley page a while back, and was wondering if you had any book/source suggestions about him. I wrote an article about his song ""The Trip"" not too long ago, but it's a little too brief for me to be satisfied with it. Any help, as always, is greatly appreciated.  "
I've read your reply to Vartan's talkpage, I don't think there need be any more evidences that Ankaram, Laciner and Falcon are all the same user. The one disapear and one reapear just after is just more than a coincidences, that each add links to his journal is more than just coincidences, that each have contributions covered in his journal is just more than coincidences. That Falcon has the same prejudicial beliefs as Laciner is also not a coincidences at all. If you are attempting to show us that there is nothing surprising that three different users contribute in the same articles where nearly no one else has contributed and that they all registered just after the other has left, than, I think it is failed. Probabilisticly, when adding all the elements, there can be no rational doubt that they are all the same person. Quebec Science is also something I read, which is more notable, but it doesn't have any entry in Wikipedia, neither has its president or what have you, his page. and I'm sure he does give lectures around the world too.  (ix)
instead led FAN eastwards onto the Plain of Jars.
Yes, I'm well aware of that some gaters claim that gamergate is a consumer revolt, but my reading of Tutelary's comment (especially given that this is a discussion of whether or not gamergate can even be properly called a 'movement') was that these sources supported the idea that gamergate is a consumer revolt, when in fact most of them do the opposite, treating the claim with suspicion.
If you want to make your mark on Wikipedia by adding entries for Conservative political hacks, you could more usefully produce an article on someone a bit more notable, such as Sir Simon Milton.
Chill out people   Look don't get too stiff! The least that can be done is have Don Cheadle 2nd, Ben Kingsley 3rd, and Gwyneth Paltrow 4th so that nobody has to irritate  eachother. After all this is going to be an awesome movie, right?
Good Information!  Going for the most accurate and complete encyclopedic content possible, should we then create a different article for the Gong Baotian and Xie Pieqi styles?  Rather than dilute the style information of each style, my thought is that we should have a separate article for each subsystem that varies significantly from the norm.  Perhaps one called 'Xie Pieqi Line Yin Style Baguazhang' and another 'Gong Baotian Line Yin Style Baguazhang'.  For each style with significant amounts of content as well as verifiable sources, splits from the main article seem to make sense to me.
" Two points.  They're going to a level of detail far beyond summary. If someone wants to learn about the structure of UNATCO (for example) not only would Eidos like to sell you a game (they could use the money), there are many, many fansites who can speculate, offer analysis, compare Deus Ex to other works, and do all sorts of things Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia both can't and shouldn't.  As for the lists of various agents - I may later regret suggesting this - how would you feel about a ""Trivial/Generic characters in Deus Ex"" article, covering the robots, the generic MIBs, the soldiers, and so on? I'm not really happy about it, but it seems like a logical place to dump this sort of thing. -  (conspire | past ops) "
Why even have the fucking talk pages if we can't comment on other users?
"(Replace ""Something"" with the exact page link) "
Health Issues?   Health issues are keeping you away? What, are you sick to your stomach because I exposed your corruption?
"   Did you read the title before making that comment? I changed it to something more suitable. Your always welcome to remove personal attacks at my talkpage Bwilkins, always. ★★★★ "
Nice snark, have fun being 400 lbs and living on Wikipedia. http://www.mycarpro.org/Used-Car-Dealer/Elliot-Hummel-Automotive-LLC/ That's her dad.  N277 N Brandenburg Ave Merrill, Wisconsin that's where her parents live
July 2013 (UTC)  Indeed, seems classic anti-gentile jewish censorship.in this case of wiki media. See C.A.M.E.R.A campaign on wiki. In short it should be added as consensus 77.53.219.2  04:30, 27
" The titles need not show that the characters are related, all about this is in the articles. You see, the nature of fiction is that it's not necessarily coherent. Since this article is not about Malcolm Wilkerson in the first episode of the show ""Malcolm in the Middle"" but about the character throughout the show, it is indeed inaccurate to use a name for the character that was only used for the pilot episode. For the entire rest of the seven season run, the character's name was only ""Malcolm"". This is not a question of beauty or taste, but of plain accuracy. A title like ""Malcolm (XXX)"" my appear clumsy, but Wilkerson is not an alternative. In my opinion. If can't build consensus on this between the two of us, I suggest asking for additional input at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions, since I didn't find anything in the guidelines for a specific case like this (although I'm fairly sure the fact that the character's name was ""Wilkerson"" only during the first of 151 episodes of the show means that calling the character ""Wilkerson"", esp. in the title, is inaccurate). —'''''' "
LOL. You are a moron.
Howard was the highest taxing govt in Australia's history, Labor then reduced the income tax rate three times since, all he did in terms of economic reform was a GST. He preferred to play the social conservative while pretending that everything we have around us, markets, the general direction of IR, taxation, etc etc, is a product of Labor which the conservative have always tried to claim the later credit for. Oh, and in modern times, slash and burn health/education/social/etc services to bring the budget back in to the black. Even though Menzies never had a budget surplus. I'd rather our money spent on us to support Australians, not held in a surplus gathering dust for no good reason - it's our money.
go vandercken!! go!! wikipedia needs you besides why are you waisting your time talking in here instead of writing an article? and why do you have a user page full of userboxes are  @!$%?*# or what ?
Better not to do so unless your school is a leader in the field.  Even then WP:COI would suggest that you let someone else do it.
Cut Yo Jibbah Jabbah And Yo Doggy Dog Hair !!   Ur Wierdddd  Cut Your Doggy Hair You Tramp  You Look Like Hagrid  GET A LIFE.. !!
, and still paraphrase it extremely closely in addition
" Seems reasonable to me.  Since the book itself is frequently referred to as ""Dianetics"", any wording that makes the distinction clear seems like a good thing to me.   (talk) "
"  Sorry!  Meant to say ""Go fuck yourself you Asperger's riddled freak for accusing me of destructive edits I had nothing to do with."""
FUck you you god damn mother fuckin son of a bitch stop being a stupid ass shithead and be fuckin cool for once
JFBurton User Page   Your not an administrator and stop acting like you are one. People add stuff to my user page all the time. Grow Up.
Typo: Gotam   In the fourth paragraph of the Plot section Gotham is spelled 'Gotam', I wanted to do a quick edit but the article is locked.
"  I see that this debate has in any case been pre-empted by User:Kotniski who has created and populated the "":Category:Constituent countries of the United Kingdom"". In my opinion this is unacceptable as  1) the debate is still in progress, indeed it has barely begun, and 2) the new category name has the rejected term ""constituent countries"" and is therefore contrary to a decision reached after a long discussion and contradicts the main article's name (Countries of the United Kingdom) and the term found in most other relevant articles.  Personally, I don't see why Wales et al should not be categoried as 'European countries'. I am certainly against this unilateral reversion to a contentious and rarely used term that has been rejected here. This new category is not acceptable and a consensus decision would also be needed for the proper and logical alternative, i.e. 'Countries of the United Kingdom', if the need for it is proven and accepted.   "
Amazingly, your sarcastic bullshit and superior attitude have inspired me to stop contributing to Wikipedia entirely.  I've already deleted all the source code for the patch I'd been developing for the project (yes, I'm a developer) and I hope you feel all good about yourself with your smug attitude.  Douche.  All the admins here (with a few exceptions) should be strung up and ridiculed by people who actually have a life.
Proposed merge with Why (4Minute song)   This article is a track listing and charts, with no actual information about the songs.  It has been this way since its creation in 2011. WP:NSONG requires more than that for a song to have an article, even if it's notable.  Wikipedia guidelines recommend merging such articles to their relevant albums, so let's do that.
(oh, and I almost forgot  start uploading pictures too!)
What do you mean it is hardly true I have proved without a shadow of a doubt that during the war the axis hade many times more raw materieals. That is abosolut fact and can been show in the graphs that i have made.  Also during the war As i have so cleary said in the proposal that i have made the Soviet Unnion lost alot of area with raw materials and the axis gained them.  If you do not know that The Axis hade and produced many times more raw materials then the Soviets then PROVE it because I have proven with real sources that the axis hade more.  ( ) Also
REDIRECT Talk:Cape May – Lewes Ferry
The new York times policy to suppress news of the Holcaust
Regarding you being a homosexual You are clearly a homosexual. I think you should leave normal society and go and live in a sewer with all the other homosexuals. You are clearly not normal. If you persist with reporting me for abusing you, I will insert a large garden gnome into you. And stay off the Dublin Airport article. It's my territory. If I say Delta serve Orlando from Dublin, then they do. Don't send me fucking patronising messages again. Fucking freak!!!
ALSO-what of this Thomas Jefferson had it reprinted in the Pennsylvania Gazette??? Is that s'posed to be FRANKLIN (who had something to do with the PA Gazette while Jefferson DIDN'T AND b/c she was going to dedicate her 2nd proposed volume to Franklin.
Fuck off   Stop vandalising stuff, thanks
You're a moron!   It's F U C K   F U C K   F U C K   A   D U C K ,   S C R E W   A   K A N G A R O O ,   6 9   A   P O R C U P I N E ,   O R G Y   A T   T H E   Z O O .
Hey Dinoguy. I have a proposel that would like to put out because I feel it is of great importance, and more accurate wise. mcelite
23:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
There are places for debates. This entry is not one of them.
"     Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Block of 88.202.62.59 lifted  - proxy access no longer working  Request handled by: '''''' (Talk)   Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request."
"  Wow...doesn't really sound like a guy who should be spending his valuable time messing around with other people's work on Wikipedia.  Yet for dramatic effect, he has time to list each and every topic on his test. Total drama queen.  I have seen admins refer to complaints of users as ""whining"" many times so I will assume that I am free to call the above post by Islander I bit whiney, in fact very (pathetically) whiney.  I hold a masters in science degree and I do not recall whining about the course work, exams etc to others - esp. to those whom I don't even know.  On top of that, within the confines of a purely voluntary project - grew up! and grow a pair!  I mean really.  WTF?  Islander, you said I should count myself ""warned"" - I think you know what to count yourself.  No, a block wouldn't surprise me at all.  It would be a typical admin knee-jerk response."
you people are pretty overzealous with this whole free thing.  get a fucking life, you fucking niggers !!!23 16!!!
Crossmr   I altered
t PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!  SALT!he
I confirmed with JREF that polygraphs and polygraph tests are eligible for the ONE MILLION DOLLARS. Please write to James Randi and ask yourself via randi@randi.org and you will get it from the horse's mouth himself, so to speak. Polygraphs are not paranormal, but they are useless, worthless, and pseudoscience- and covered by the Randi Challenge.  February 28th., +2008 Gregorian Calendar
"   A kitten for you!   Thank you for your support. )     "
Ideas, ideas   Hey, how's it goin' Ginkgo100? I had a couple ideas I wanted to bounce off another editor to see what they thought: you’re the editor. Here's what’s going on in my head:  First; I was looking at the Bill Ritter (politician) article a little while ago and thinking it was a little dull. You scored that good shot of Ritter at the CDC, and that's about all the color we've got. So, I stopped by Ritter's campaign site (http://www.ritterforgovernor.com) and found a great screenshot off KUSA of the latest poll numbers (drop by and take a look if you can). I thought maybe this might be worth uploading (if applicable; didn't check yet) and using in the Ritter article and Colorado gubernatorial election, 2006. What do you think?  In a related thought, I stumbled upon the video of the Ritter/Beauprez debates from Aug. 11 (Here's a link ). Other articles I've read have contained video, but this one might be a little to long (any thoughts?) and may not be material appropriate or applicable to upload onto Wikipedia.  Second, I'm going to plunge into a clean-up effort that looks a little challenging over at National Western Stock Show (take a look and you'll see what I mean). If you can, and you like what's one of my favorite events in Denver, drop by the article and help me out a little.  Thanks for the help; I've written a lot here, my apologies. See ya' around, have a good one.
" When contributing in future, please try not to create pages you're personally involved in. As the policy says; ""Wikipedia is not for things made up one afternoon"". If it isn't a notable project, which you should've been able to see that this isn't, it shouldn't be included.  lds "
yep, he doesn't stop talking crap!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111oneoneoneone
"  You and Your Uncivil Friends Refuted  Your Uncivil Friends Refuted  Or were you saying something to the over 300 people who've downloaded this refutation of you're lies?:  http://www.mininova.org/tor/1264745  And so that everyone can see part of it here:  JoshuaZ said:  ""Starfire, as I tried to explain to you Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and verifiability, not truth. Now, if you read that guideline, you may understand why in general AIG and many of the other sources you used are not reliable sources.""  Hey JoshuaZ the liar, where does Wikipedia's policy say that AnswersInGensis.org is not a reliable source? Where JoshuaZ the vandal and liar? Show us. So you think saying, ""Now"" is scientific evidence that you are a wise and intelligent teller of the truth or that you know what a reliable and verifiable source is?  JoshuaZ, where does Wikipedia's policy say that the Jacob Sheep Association = a reliable and verifiable source that Jacob Sheep are biologically primitive you hypocrite? Explain that hypocrite who personally attacked Starfire777 using lies.  Show your references JoshuaZ. Saying, ""Now"" is not a reference that your accusations are true are they? Why can't you make sense Joshua?  Again, where did those verses prophecy anything? Do these look like prophecies JoshuaZ?:  Joshua also said:  ""In this case, they did have sources, so you have even less of an argument.""  Wrong JoshuaZ. Simply citing sources as you yourself said does not make the source valid. It must be substantiated and verifiable. Why do you conveniently forget that you smug babbling hypocrite?  Your later comments don't merit much of a response, but I wThen he said:  ""ill simply note that accusing people of bigotry, bias, hypocrisy, irrationality and trolling makes my earlier comment about not using ""Darwinist"" as a slur somewhat irrelevant;""  Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you said is true is true because you said so. So much for references eh? All you have to do is accuse and it makes you right, right hypocrite? See how you go round and round in circles using circular reasoning?  ""if your earlier comment toed the line, the one above crosses it.""  Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you say is true because you said so. Science!  ""I suggest you calm down""  I suggest you not use sarcastic insults like that, ok hypocrite? You're implying that the Starfire777 is ill-tempered merely because he points out that you are hypocrite and uses logic to do so (as well as verifiable references on Answersingenesis.com which you lied about not being reliable and being against Wikipedia's rules to cite), ok liar?  I suggest you also not command a Christian to follow your moral standards over Christ's, over God's. He is a Christian don't ya know? Are you now God to tell him how to feel and think? I suggest you read this verse and take it to heart which millions of Christians know very well so that you learn how not to offend them again:  ""Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil."" - Ephesians 4:26-27  Last time I checked JoshuaZ, neither your nor Wikipedia's rules superceded God's.   ""and read the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines while you wait for your block to expire.""  Oh the old ""you need to read it but I don't"" and ""you sit and think while your grounded young man"" insults. What an arrogant, childish hypocrite you are.  I suggest that you stop pretending that whatever you say is true merely because you said it, and again, learn what Starfire777 properly told you to learn.  I'll enhance the list for you:  Reference, evidence, truth, reality, lie, bigot, hypocrite, fallacy, circular reasoning, troll, stalking, harassment, insults, hatred, and love.  And Joshua also said:  ""This is in addition to issues of original research in regard to Biblical prophecies and other issues on the Charles Darwin page.""  Wow you sure like to weasel-word: ""other issues""? What are you references for this vague ""other issues"" JoshuaZ the Policy Master of Wikpedia?  And Joshua, who said anything about prophecies? Where did Starfire777 say anothing about prophecies? No JoshuaZ the wannabe scholar, he said ""predicted"" in the same way that science can be used to predict the outcome of an experiment. If your lazy-brained truth-careless self had been paying attention to what he said CARE FULL Y you might have noticed that the verses were using PAST TENSE JOSHUA, not FUTURE TENSE JOSHUA. If you are unable to tell the difference between past tense and futur
Nor, oddly a dictatorship where lonesome boys get off on meaningless power trips.  ColScott
Good idea. Let's continue the discussion at Talk:György Paál.
"   Replaceable fair use Image:Frex denver.jpg   Thanks for uploading Image:Frex denver.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:   Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.  On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.  Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.  If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy.  If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  "
" Perhaps I seem to be repeating myself as you are repeatedly ignoring what I'm writing. The tables are unclear as the order of the product is unclear from them. E.g. the top-right corner of the first table is e6. But does that mean e1 × e7 = e6 or e7 × e1 = e6 ? It would not matter if the product is commutative but as it's not the tables are ambiguous. That is why tables are a very poor way to show the product, and probably why none of the sources use them. And again please read MOS:LEAD in paticular the section on providing an accessible overview. Or look at the articles already mentioned, Special relativity and Cross product. Or one you are familiar with, Pythagorean theorem. Or a similarly advanced article to this one (and a featured article), Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector. There should be little or no maths in the introduction: perhaps a statement of the product, but nothing else. Certainly not the page of detailed mathematical working and argument that there is now.wordsdeeds "
"   Is this map accurate? =  I see some problems with this map:  1- It seems to me that this map only shows the very first homo-sapiens immigrations, not the further ones...   1a- For example, regarding New Zealand, this map shows the islands being occupied by melanesian peoples that I suppose to be the morioris, while we know the maoris (the ones who come after the morioris and decimated them) were actually Polinesian...   1b- Europe is shown being occupied by settlers from Anatolia, those were the certainly the Paleo-Europeans... This map does not show the further occupation of Europe by the Indo-Europeans who originated in the Caspian Basin, migrated to Europe and pushed the Paleoeuropeans westards and southwards.  1c- The Brazilian Amerindians are not of Colombian ancestry, they are either of Caribbean origin (the Caribs and Arawaks) or of Paraguayan-Northern-Argentine origin (the Tupi-Guaranis).  The bulk of the Amerindians who were in Brazil about the time of the arrival of the Portuguese were these Tupi-Guaranis.  They came from Paraguay and spread all over the Brazilian coast till the valley of the Amazon River.  When you show a map where Brazilian Amerindians are all coming from Colombia, you are showing a totally contradictory information.   1d- The Dravidians reached India from Ethiopia to Yemen, from Yemen to Oman, from Oman to Southeast Iran, from Southeast Iran to the Valley of Indus.  What is shown on that map is that the route of the occupation of India by the Indo-Europeans (from Iran through Bactria).  1e- The hipothesis of ancient waves of Paleoeuroepan settling in the eastern coast of North America is ignored, while some geneticists have found evidences of that due to the existance of the Mithocondrial gene ""X"" (""Xenia"") among North-American Native Americans.  1f- This map also seems to ignore the Australoid migrations to South America, some people claim that the Australoids have reached South America before the Mongoloids due to some archeological findings in Brazil.  Anyways, I believe it should be explained that the migrations of the homo-sapiens show on that map are only the first, the early migrations, and the route of their early settling in India should be corrected.    Also, I would suggest a second map, showing further homo-sapiens migrations (now including the Maori migration from Polinesia, the correct migrations in South America and the settling of the Indo-Europeans in Europe.  189.25.2.194  R. Alberto"
" Bold text'Italic text[[[Link title]  [[Media:Media:Example.ogg#REDIRECT [[Insert text]]]]  ]]'''"
"  Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.   Gespräch   Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?!   I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days.  Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block.   Gespräch   3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?!   Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.   Gespräch   Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?!   I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days.  Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block.   Gespräch   3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?!   Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.   Gespräch   Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?!   I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days.  Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block.   Gespräch   3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?!   Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.   Gespräch   Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?!   I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days.  Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block.   Gespräch   3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?!   Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.   Gespräch   Why are you guys so mean? Can't I play with my own talk page?!   I suggest you wait out the block, it's only for 3 days.  Anymore talk page abuse and you will not be able to edit this page for the duration of the block.   Gespräch   3 DAYS!?!? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO UNTIL THEN!?!   Stop with the false unblock notices   Putting up false notices like this one will get your talk page protected for the rest of your block.  [[User:Momu
There are no blog posts or forum threads. Look properly: http://www.lehigh.edu/~infrk/2011.08.article.html - this is one is Lehigh University website http://www4.lehigh.edu/news/newsarticle.aspx?Channel=%2FChannels%2FNews%3A+2007&WorkflowItemID;=0bed2560-462b-4bd9-b834-4b5a1e91cc54 - this is one too is Lehigh University website http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx?articleID=1211 - this one is structural magazine website https://ialcce2012.boku.ac.at/keynote_details.php?profile=5 - this is also another univeristy website. http://www.constructionweekonline.com/article-9180-top-10-worlds-tallest-steel-buildings/#.UwHewZgRTCM These are not questionable sources. These are proper websites written by professionals. So please see them properly 58.97.168.109  13:45, 20 February 2014
I removed the tag, as there is absolutely no evidence of a problem.  A citation is of course not copyright infringement. Ichibani  tc
It's not about some obscure song. Rather, it's about a very famous song that purportedly was written about her. That's more than trivia. It's a part of her life that she has talked about on many occasions.
REDIRECT Talk:Guillermo García López
"   Thanks     The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Thank you for cleaning up my (and others) user pages! Your vandalism hunting is greatly appreciated. '''' (talk|contribs)'' "
" Still, however inappropriate Coffee's blocks were, we wouldn't want him doing something to himself in RL if he's encountering issues as claimed in his edit page space.. I know I wouldn't want to be responsible for that sort of thing, and you never know with some people.♦  "
DIREKTOR, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a complete different state than Serbia and Montenegro. It wasn't like Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Kingdom of Yugoslavia, or Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 2003, after the adoption of the Constitutional Charter, whole system of government was changed. Even the position of Prime Minister was abolished, and merged with the position of President. Those two countries realy need a separate articles.
"::::::Even the claim of ""essentially segregated lives"" is bogus. Of course lives aren't 100% integrated, since these are two different cultures, with different customs and languages. But what separation exists is purely voluntary - some Arabs prefer to live in an Arab town/village, and that's understandable. Most Arabs send their kids to Arab school - so they can study in Arabic. However, some send their kid to a Hebrew speaking school - I had an Arab classmate, for instance (whose father was a department head in the city hospital, by the way). Many Arabs live in towns with a Jewish majority, and there's no law against that, and no one prevents them from doing so. Several cities in Israel have substantially mixed populations, including Jerusalem, Haifa, Jaffa, Lod, Ramle, Beer Sheva and others. There's no segregation, and no separation.    "
"  The book ""Die Nemesis von Potsdam"" has 47 pages of bibliography  archives, demographic studies, official publications of the U.S., Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Poland, etc. besides secondary literature.  These sources are tken into account in some 1000 footnotes in the book, and brought up to date in the 14th revised and enlarged edition, which you can borrow from any library.  As far as German statistics on the deaths that resulted from the evacuation/flight/expulsion of the Germans, the figure of 2 million deaths is considered to be on the low side of the spectrum. As you may know, the German Red Cross, ""Statistisches Bundesamt"", ""Heimatortskarteien"", ""Gesamterhebung"" and other professional, not amateur institutions carried out careful demographic studies, especially in connection with the search for missing persons.  This work was carried out over many years, and the results were always the same  between 2 and 3 million missing and dead.  The fact that Poland was a victim of aggression and war crimes by both Germany and the Soviet Union does not justify or legalize the crimes committed against East Prussian farmers, Silesian coal miners, factory workers and their families.  JvA"
EPIC FAIL! EPIC FAIL EPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAILEPIC FAIL! EPIC FAIL
"   Trabecula   I am not exactly sure of your use of the word ""trabecula"", which can be a microscopic feature of solid looking bones.   "
TLTS   Hey there! I find that you reverted few edits of mine. One being the addition of this image. Please do not change it back to the image you uploaded because it has a higher resolution. As far as the addition of DVD release dates is concerned, I added the regions only after I saw that various episode lists feature all the 3 regions. Anyway I would like your input and hopewe can continue to better the episode list. Do care to leave a talkback!
"  Regrettably, I have to agree about the Gameplay section. It comes off more like an academic discourse on the incorporation of multiple characters and changes from previous franchise entries in video games, using Mother 3 as an example, than a proper encyclopedic entry. I won't quickfail just for this, but I do want it fixed before I'll pass. I'd prefer the section to be rewritten entirely, but some glaring points follow: ""Mother 3 is presented in eight chapters with rotating player-characters including the protagonist's ""cowboy father"", the ""family dog"", an ""inept thief"", and ""abused monkey"""" - So is the protagonist not playable? How large is the party? Why are these descriptions in quotes? - it suggests equivocation in your understanding of the characters. Actually, why isn't the protagonist named in this section? Again, I completely understand the desire to approach this from an out-of-universe perspective, but only to the point where the prose doesn't trip over its own detachment. ""Mother 3 begins with naming the members of the player-character's family along with questions of the player's favorite food and ""thing"",[3] and opens to a ""pastoral forest village"" soon interrupted by a forest fire and the Pig Mask Army, who impose police state-like conditions on the village.[2] With the fire's outbreak, the father ventures out to protect his family (twin sons Lucas and Claus and wife Hinawa), but the rest of the world is eventually implicated in the plot.[1] They set out to take down the Pig Mask Army.[4] Lucas, the game's hero, does not become prominent until the fourth chapter. The game features a lighthearted plot, with enemies like ""partying ghosts"" and ""talking rope snakes"".[5] Porky, a character from EarthBound, appears as the leader of the Pig Mask Army and is the game's main antagonist. In addition, other EarthBound characters, such as Dr. Andonuts and Mr. Saturn, also appear."" - Why isn't this stuff in Plot? The cast of characters does need to be introduced better, but jamming plot details into Gameplay isn't the way to do that. The second paragraph is better; it's more in line with what I expect from a GA gameplay section. At least, it's good until ""Apart from this rhythm and combo mechanic, the battle system is similar to that of its predecessor."" What's the predecessor's battle system like? Remember, not everyone reading this has played EarthBound. ""There is no need to grind for experience and it has no random battles"" - First of all, this should start off with a ""However"" or something of the like as its predecessor does have those things. The information is also lacking, though - why isn't there a need to grind for experience? I think of this as one of the central, love-it-or-hate-it JRPG mechanics, and I'm curious as to how the genre might work without it. Imagine reading a Pokémon game article that simply states that you can change your party as needed (which is unusual for a JRPG) without giving a brief overview of how the PC and Day Care systems work - that's how I feel reading this. "" and lets the player see their magic ""PSI power"" abilities"" - Viewing your abilities probably isn't a necessary gameplay detail, but why isn't there anything on the abilities themselves and their use in battle? And do they have uses outside battle, like HMs, Rock Smash, Secret Power, and Softboiled do in Pokémon? ""While Mother 3's music is both similar in tone to its predecessors and completely new, it features similar sound effects."" - By ""completely new"" do you mean it isn't recycled wholesale, or that the style is somehow new? Also, this bit probably doesn't belong in Gameplay.  If you're up to rewriting this, which I encourage - especially if you're shooting for FA - I'd recommend a structure like the following: Paragraph 1: It's a top-down JRPG, there's an overworld, you explore towns with your team of characters, yada yada yada. Paragraph 2: There are battles, they're not random (with an explanation of the conditions under which you do encounter battles - is it like in Pokémon Colosseum where you only fight other Trainers, or like in Dragon Ball Z: Buu's Fury where you can see the enemies on the overworld before fighting them?), this is how the battle system works, this is how items work, this is how experience points/leveling work (again, how is this the case without grinding? Or is a different system used entirely?). Paragraph 3: Your team consists of such-and-such a number of characters, they change with different events in the story, characters do/don't return once they leave, here are examples of the characters and how they differ in and out of battle. Stuff like items and saving (can you save anywhere?) - work in wherever you want; I'm not picky.   21:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC
"  The biggest conflict of interest is that she has had a personal email relationship and she is angry about something else.  For diffs on an earlier dispute, I would have to get them from her talk page, around middle of March of this year.  I will get you diffs from my talk page now.  Please wait.Malke2010 "
The new article is already complete. I'm just adding a few finishing touches/citations. It can be viewed on my talk page.
Yes I now provided some information on the image. Thanks.
If you have research questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Reference desk.  Thanks,