diff --git "a/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#severe_toxic/val_text.txt" "b/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#severe_toxic/val_text.txt" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/SOCKET_DATA/jigsaw#severe_toxic/val_text.txt" @@ -0,0 +1,10932 @@ +Maylene and the Sons of Disaster +Fixed Aretaeus quote misattributed to Plato. 108.36.156.170 +Zip It! I don't care to hear your whining. Clearly, you are here to cause discord, not to contribute anything useful to the project. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to American International School - Abu Dhabi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Thanks, Alison. I think that there are a couple of folks whose editing privileges should be nominated for deletion!! +Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered Bastered You Bastered +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Pussila, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (talk) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- ! +" Josh Josh, I perfectly understood you. I have added a new topic on the Kurds talk page showing my viewponts about 2 days ago, but I cant see it anymore. Therefore, I have created another today. I do not, however, see where the consensus was made that the Kurds are ""Iranian."" Can you please link me to it?" +:Image:Map of USRD quality articles.svg Would you please update this map to show the newer articles that have reached GA, A-Class, and FA status? If you can't, I could ask someone else. was here. (T - C - - E) +" I agree with brother , there is too much notable coverage of ""based"" being, at the very least, an established genre for it not to be included in this article. _friend " +) You're my sock puppet Ian ; +as licking butt kissing face-up-jimbos-ass-butt-kissing +Spending Review Of 2005 That Never Happened During the Andrew Marr interview that coincided with the book launch, Tony Blair stated that he thought that a spending review was needed in 2005, but that he was unable to start one because Gordon Brown was politically too strong. Is this discussed in the book? If so, then it is dynamite - the deficit is going to be a major issue for years to come - and it would certainly be worth mentioning in the article. +" Thanks for that, and I'll work on my report off site, to reduce tension. 'fenian' " +You guys are all right, I am here to announce my original research that the 44 hour day is not superior to the 24 hour day. Sorry for my over reaction and general cranky tear. I think I'm starting to understand the idea of finding interested people and talking to them. +Really your intimidation tactics are really poor and reflect your own heavy handed neo-con POV -) Good luck. I have been fair and balanced with all of the facts and references used. +Clarification I am innocent user.I think you have got a misunderstanding about my comments, because I have written in Hindi. +]]- 10 September 1910, [[[Couvet]] ) +Glad we cleared that up! +Especially noteworthy are the first 14 seconds of that sample.. +" On the main article page my computer lists the article itself as ""B-class. A good article nominee etc."" (but thanks for fixing the banners).Granitethighs " +ARRR! RUDDY McRUDSTER Why did you delete that page? that took many hours and he is known to many around the town i live in! I am extremely unhappy i could break a cyinder block with my face right now! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? HUH? PUNK? Thats right hide behind your dumg little computer! LAME! Alright consider putting that page back on or else! +(UTC) The entire affair is fairly well documented at the encyclopedia dramatica page, found at www.ED(expand this).com/The_Incident. ED is, of course, by far the most reliable source that has ever been used on Wikipedia. {fact} Nevertheless, they do tend to chronicle anon actions such as this pretty well, and they have links to everything that was obtained. It would be pretty easy to find out the answer to this question. For what it's worth, the ED page claims Palin was conversing with an aide via email about using the email for gov't business, but that would be easily verifiable via the wikileaks page, linked to at the bottom of the article. 05:28, 6 October 2009 +" Certainly there's a campaign against ID/Creationism! What are the Panda's Thumb and the NCSE all about? Read the first paragraph at this fairly recent PT post, which is a reprint from another activist site. One Lenny Frank claims, ""Since then, I have also been a regular commentator at the well-respected Panda's Thumb blog, which serves as a nerve center for anti-creationist and anti-ID activists."" Right at the top of their page, the NCSE proclaims, ""NCSE provides information and advice as the premier institution dedicated to keeping evolution and climate change in the science classroom and to keep out creationism and climate change denial."" (NCSE and most RSs define ID as a form of creationism.) We ourselves assert that ""the NCSE also opposes intelligent design and other 'alternatives' to evolution because they are misleading euphemisms for creationism."" Their opposition is not merely philosophical, but behind the microphone and in print. Just wondering if we're all clear there's also an ID campaign against evolution? " +Words are powerful. I agree that we should use the meaning of words as they are being used. It is also true that we are improving our understanding of inflation all the time. With that we also improve the use of inflation jargon to reduce the confusion surrounding the concept of inflation. Inflation still is a very foggy concept. +" I was headed to CHL's talk page to explain my endorsement when I was blocked by you for my ""trolling."" I have no intent to edit the RFC or Durova's talk page again - I wash my hands of this whole thing. You can feel free to unblock me now. " +September 2006 Thank you for experimenting with the page pony on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +" May 2008 (UTC) i think steve has had an identity crisis and attributed his 'interpretation' by judadum to another party dajudem. i also believe steve's ""penalizing people for activities outside of Wikipedia"" demonstrates ignorance of what i said with his interpretation of what i said. but this is your page Gni and i apologize for the intrusion. 04:33, 9" +According to the page history, the statement was made by | (talk) | (contribs) +Passed. Congratulations. +, Welcome to Wikipedia, +If anyone is vandalising the page it's you, not me. Please do not remove my accurate, factual referenced material as I will simply undo all your edits. +":Don't forget the old maxim: ""The camera adds ten pounds."" It's true; everything appears slightly larger on film. " +College templates I have created a series of templates for former students of Oxford's various colleges. There are still plenty to do, but if you want to add one the the templates to your user page then feel free. See University of Oxford/College Templates for complete list. +—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 08:41, 17 May 2008 +Volunteer Marek - JPLeonard has a point, even if his wording does please some. This incident occurred well into a massive propaganda war. The western media had for some time been reporting statements that were part of this war. So too, no doubt, had the Russian media. The Straits Times IS an excellent source, and possibly further removed from the propaganda war than many. Please don't dismiss it out of hand. +Expansion in list I've been working on an expansion of the highest-grossing films by month table in the List of highest-grossing Bollywood films. Its there in right now. Could you give your comments on it? Its not yet fully complete (some months require some additions) but just generally. Thanks, ~*~Bhatt~*~ +I'm thinking about reverting your edit, but I'm going to wait until tonight (PST) so I can watch one of my recorded episodes first. The reason is that I don't think the Japanese version calls it a secret ingredient, but rather a theme ingredient. I think your edit would be more appropriate on the Iron Chef America page. If they do refer to it as a secret ingredient, then your addition should of course remain.  ♬ 17:45, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) +" Let's take a good pause, please Let's keep ""disputed"" tag on both versions of the article as things stand, keep them linking to each other or even both on the same page, let's call it a pause, because this is such a waste of time and I have better things to do with mine. I think before we work on any content we need to work out a method for discussing things between us and coming to agreement over them, or at least accomodating acceptable disgreements and showcasing them where needed. I think it would be better, instead of fighting over two versions and reverting endlessly, that we agree on facts on a point-by-point basis, and discuss the verifiable and reliable sources of each. This is demanded by Wikipedia policies anyhow, that content must be based on verifiable and reliable sources. This would perhaps be my main suggestion, and I request that everyone here please make comment on how we could make this work. No content, not for now, but just process. What process would you suggest and what would you find acceptable procedure. Regards. csssclll ()" +Thanks for your reply. +" Where? I surrender. Non-attorneys have decided an entry on a genuine court case is the place to reargue the case. Nonsense like this is why Wikipedia can't rise to the level of a reference work. ""I don't remember them explicitly addressing ..."" - you do understand that this *was* an entry on Parker v District of Columbia, not Chemerinsky's ideas? No? No suprise there. Have fun in sandbox, children. " +Everything about the current dating of the Exodus is circular reasoning. And the absence of Hebrews in Egypt except in the 12th and 13th Dynasties seems to be no problem for the folks conduncting the reasoning. Neither the Hyksos period nor the following dynasties (18+19) had any relevant numbers of Aamu dwelling in Egypt (and the Hyksos elite themselves were mainly Indo-Europeans and not Semites). +" WHY the King JAMES ONLY MOVEMENT rejects modern translations Here is what was written: ""In the modern period, the King-James-Only movement is opposed to new translations precisely because they're officially-endorsed by ""mainstream"" Protestant denominations"". reply: You would have to prove that. You would have to show direct quotes, direct cause and effect between the 1. rejection by KJVO (Abreviated as KJVO on this page for the sake of brevity) of the modern versions 2. their own explanations of their rejections of modern versions BECAUSE they are officially endorsed by ""mainstream"" Protestant denominations. However, even if you could find such explanations in passing, the reason why KJVOs reject Modern versions is because the Modern Versions are innacurate, NOT because the official versions are endorsed by ""mainstream"" Protestant denominations. Most KJVOs would not care who endorsed a particular version, if their own conclusions were that the Version in question were accurate. Therefore to suggest that ""In the modern period, the King-James-Only movement is opposed to new translations precisely because they're officially-endorsed by ""mainstream"" Protestant denominations"". implies a cause and effect relationship between the conclusions of the KJVOs and the basis upon which that reasoning was made, which is faulty. Theo5" +And Unambiguous advertising or promotion, this is not correct... Their wasnt even a link back to our site.. only information about the project. +[press edit to read it on line poet formation] +Eat my shorts Eat my shorts, Arsefacey. +I am a huge tool bag. +" Role in Russian civil war That section states the Bolsheviks won that war in the late 1919. That is completely wrong by any historic books and textbooks. Officially the war ended in 1922, but there was still fighting going on in the Russian Far East. That is what the Soviet historical textbooks say. For some reason the war with the Ukraine is being perceived as the Civil war in Soviet times and it seems that the same trend exist today as well. That is also wrong. Ukraine was a recognized state by the Soviet Russia as well as by the other numerous countries. That was a straight aggresion against the Ukrainian republic, following an unbelievable slaughtering of population in Ukraine by bolsheviks (Kyiv and Podillia still remembered). In 1920 Ukraine united with Poland to stop the bolshevik bandits. The Soviet textbooks state that it was an intervention of the ""White"" Polish burgouis, relating it to the Russian white movement which is way off. Not on the subject of the section, but Stalin should be recognized as the enemy of the world and, at least, should be on the same page with Adolf Hitler. Stalin was way more evil. Not all of his wrongdoings are uncovered, but the one that already are known can easily convict the guy. His name should be cursed for the eternity and humanity needs to learn to avoid the next Stalin. Define ""convict."" What exactly is Stalin guilty of? Killing off men and women that he believed threatened the unity and safety of his nation? Knights did that all the time. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union became incredibly well-developed, albeit uncaring towards others. They even beat us in the space race. I'm sure all of our wonderful presidents would have thought that would happen with the amazing ideals of wonderful democracy. Luna RainHowLCry Article discussion only please, not discussion on the subject. This applies to a few discussions you two have commented on, so could you please keep on subject for the sake of others and the capacity of wikipedia to handle this chat. Thanks I appreciate your concern, however, initiation of a debate that clearly violates WP:NPOV, WP:BATTLE, WP:ANARCHY and WP:SOAP must be commented on and stopped. It may seem slightly edit-warrish, but bear with me/us. As for Wikipedia's capacity to handle this chat...WP:PAPER. ...Ω.....¿TooT?....¡StatS!.. " +Wrong again, Calton. You just keep coming up trumps. CattleGirl, check out the history. Calton has axes to grind, but admins have admonished him already. I reported him and User Griot on the Incidents board. Thanks again for your help. +These blood-thirsty liberal lynch mobs wanted to turn Trayvon into another Emmett Till. No, not kidding again. They are so full of intense HATRED towards white people, that when the perp turns out to NOT be white....they make him white anyway! lol +" And what are you doing???? you are belittling me and assuming i was belittling him i wasnt but celarly you think i was, and since as you put on that users block denial page that you know aspberger pretty well you are showing you do not, so thanks for the response (talk - contrib) " +For the sake of coherence, I have tried to disentangle the original exchange above from the various hostile interruptions – though readers may wish to go back a few saves to put it back together again properly. If you are responsible for them all, Araliel, would you care in future to put all your thoughts together at the bottom of the piece in question, so that the rest of us can make better sense of them both – as I have usually tried to do recently? As for the original texts that you question, these are freely available from the facsmile sites listed under External Links. +" Fair enough. ~~ [talk] " +It's the known vandal user Enviroknot and his sockpuppet Existentializer. +" Same question for Italian, and Armenian (etc.) If Blaise was born in the 3rd century in Roman Cappadocia, he would have lived in a Greek-speaking environment. It turns out that Sebaste became part of the Armeniac Theme in the 7th century, but this is centuries later, and provides about as much motivation for treating Blaise as ""Armenian"" as for treating him as ""Turkish"". His Acts are in Greek. Perhaps there is some evidence of a particularly early tradition of veneration in the Armenian church, but if there is, the article as it stands is unaware of it. (𒁳) " +, 21 October 2014 (UTC) As I said above, Deep learning is the name of a class of algorithms. Feedforward neural nets, restricted Boltzmann machines, deep neural networks and deep belief networks are all mathematical models. How the models are trained, that is, how model parameters are chosen to optimize some loss function, is another topic entirely. People had looked at deep neural network architectures before deep learning techniques were developed, but it was the deep learning techniquesunsupervised pre-training, layer by layerthat made deep networks more practical at the time. With today's GPU based algorithms, the need for pre-training has lessened. The hype surrounding deep learning has muddied the concept to point that people like Michael Jordan claim it is just a synonym for neural network. But the backlash from current hype doesn't change the historical importance of deep learning algorithms in generating interest and good results in deep neural network models or representational learning. Schmidhuber's review has a good discussion of these issues. 21:55 +" (or ""french actor with russian citizenship"")" +ami killed sailor moon . +Replacement ref - 1UP archive not working? | (Complain here) +POTD notification ]] Hi Tomer, Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Anthocharis cardamines female MichaD.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 1, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-01-01. Thank you for all of your contributions! — +Thank you for your feedback! Hi, Vsmith! Thanks for your feedback on my contributions. I will aim to diversify the sources I use to provide a more balanced point of view. +Top Spin 3 Good idea emailing them, and you're correct the roster needs changing, but I believe they will announce more soon, at least I hope they do! Can't have a legends section without McEnroe after all, hehe. +" My quibble was the use of the word ""automatic"". This suggests, to me, something that happens without human intervention, which surely cannot be the case. A visa cannot issue itself, law or no law. The system that issues visas must be informed of the visit of the royal personage, and that information can only be provided by a human. Effectively, someone, somewhere, has to decide to approve the issuing of this visa, and after that the system does what it needs to do. To cause such a visa to be denied might be unprecedented and unthinkable, but surely someone, somewhere, has such a hypothetical power. That it may never be used still does not make the issuing of the visa ""automatic"", in my understanding of the word. " +(ec with Marskell) Ottava, You seem to be very upset about this, and I am really clueless as to why (and why you hold this position about NPOV and consensus). Using your reasoning, we should never be able to oppose on comprehensiveness issues either, because if a consensus of the regular editors of the page says that the article is comprehensive, then it must be. FAC's entire purpose is to try to get a larger perspective on whether the article meets the appropriate policies or guidelines (in other words, consensus can change). I do think that the RCC page suffers sometimes because most of its editors have a very strong POV. That is understandable; people usually work on topics they are passionate about (either for or against). I fully acknowledge (and praise) that they are trying to make the article as NPOV as possible, but when you hold a strong POV sometimes it is hard to recognize where neutral actually is. That is why processes like FAC, GAN, and PR are essential, because then you can get (hopefully) the opinions of people who don't hold a strong POV on the topic. I would encourage you to post at WT:FAC to see what the consensus is for how to review an article - are NPOV and comprehensiveness concerns off-limits? Or perhaps it would be useful to post at WT:NPOV to see whether there is consensus for your view that NPOV is decided solely by consensus. Please let me know if you initiate a discussion, as I would like to participate. +obi2canibe made 4 reasons to put factual errors tags. Time to Time kingdom of Kandy annexed Jaffna kingdom - verified using referenced 3 sentence as above my comment. Verified sentence is not factual errors. Removed the all other nations except Tamil Hindus and only included Muslims. But they massacred Sinhalese villages like Kent farm,Dollar farm,.. Boundary between the Kandyan Kingdom and the British possessions - It was refereed in the article. Not a factual error. possibly to several scattered settlements near the Eastern seaboard - Used the word most of Sri Lankan Tamils to recognize scattered SLTs. Now since I have fixed obi2canibe's concerns I am removing the factual error tag. +I should comment that at FAC level most internet sources must go due to lack of reliability. There will be enough published information to write a good article. +heads up, there was a good revertion you removed, he has a purple barnstar asf +DWO: Have you even been following the exchange going on here? An observation is NOT a personal attack. There is NO OTHER WAY to explain the remarks he's made here other than mental illness or a learning disability. How is he even allowed to contribute to Wiki? Seriously? And why did you allow the post to stand up top, but then remove the one from today? I've bolded it for you so it's easier to find. +Again, the word is open to interpretation. Everyone refers to 'national costume' and I don't think they imply anything to it. 【遯卋山人】 +" She legally changed her name to ""Miley Ray Cyrus"" in Jan 2008 and this should be reflected in beg of articl as in ""Miley Ray Cyrus"" (former legal name........) Just one source of many: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20174585,00.html" +Also File:RSS Resolution (LS208)& Protector USV, North Arabian Gulf.jpg. — +" Welcome to Wikipedia Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over 4 million articles in a host of languages. The English Language Wikipedia alone has over 1 million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  " +" New for substrings with accented letters 07-May-2010: I have created Template:Str_index/getchar (and Template:Substr_any) to also handle any of those dozens of accented letters and ligatures. Since the character comparison is done in a MediaWiki switch-expression, there would be almost no performance impact in adding switch-cases (for accented letters) to be added onto the end of the list. A switch-expression (since January 2008) exits upon the first match, and does not compare the remaining letters in the list. {{substr_any|XYZÈèĖėÇç |5|10}}  returns 4 letters """" as too short for 10. Template:Str_index/getchar can be updated to match more accented letters or other special characters, as needed for future use. - " +(ec)Congratulations - I'm still vary of Q12 though ;-) +I don't think I understand you. Would you want every page mentioned on Wikipedia:Links to disambiguating pages deleted also? +" In response to your feedback  雲‍水   " +Aldux, As far as I kow, an article has to be nominated as a Good Article or Featured Article. I am certainly not a judge of a well written article by any means, however as per the accessment table, a B Grade is the highest I could give the article. Please feel free to change it if you feel it should be higher. +The tags you pointed to should be added to the article, either on the top of the page or below the relevant ==Heading== +or male/male dominance issues +I have created Template:Catalonia topics, like Template:France topics or Template:Scotland topics. I think you could help me in this request, where I have asked to be added to templates of Europe. In addition, maybe you could help creating the missing articles in the template of Catalan topics, such as Art in Catalonia or Architecture in Catalonia. Salutacions. +Howard Cosell I was quite pleased to see the improvement you made to the article. I did not know that there was a connection there between those two fine gentlemen until I saw your edit. Thank you for your help. There is one thing that I am not sure about though. With you being here so long and with all of your edits, I was surprised to see such a lame way of referencing the information. I would think that anyone with half a brain that has been here as long as you would have finally stumbled onto basic editing guidelines. Anyways Happy Editing to you, please continue to contribute here and let me know if you need any assistance. +) 18:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC +IN BENIDORM THEY SPEAK VALENCIAN, NOT CATALAN. I EDITED THIS. (HOW INSULTING WOULD IT BE FOR SOMEONE TO HAVE THEIR LANGUAGE REPLACED AND WIPED OUT BY SOME OTHER ONE...). THANKS. +ABUSE OF POWER Please refrain from using your admin status for egotistical reasons. It is considered vandalism. +I'm sure it will end pretty fast. These things tend to escalate less if you don't respond to them as frequently - it gives everyone a chance to cool down between comments. +" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RB72 " +" Isn't it what you ususally say each and every time? specially when dévoilé? and isn't it also what you do together with imposing a title when I write a thing who is too true too close to what you can't accept? You have inserted a title on my article and you do not have the right to do so. It is exactly what you did for exactly a month ago to my article concerning your cooperation with Jean pierre Voyer, calling it repeatidly garbage, deleeting it and having me banned for telling the truth. Thats how you met your énglish connection circle of friend on wiki admi board, like Geogre, Bishonnen, snowboard, Maru, and rjb. All I say is always prooven right, and if ""so easely proven false"" so why didn't you do it so right away, we all know that if you really could thats what you will have really done...not talk about doing., and that when you pretend to can but dont do, it means that you can't do it, you can't proove it wrong, but you can rename it revert it, call it garbage, and the like, braf, you are acting like an impotent thinker! And all my links are statements from laurent and yourself: his scientifical destruction of all arguments and evidencies stated above, and your answer to it, very known answer I should add,: ""I don't care if I am wrong, and I don't care about what you say, I will always stand the same things no matter what!"". YBM - june 2004 - Well, clap, clap, and life goes on, my dear, with such a statement we do know whith what we have to do, like say my friend, a french psychanalist that I put on your case, and who has been studying your profile on the network for a little while. Gee! you are sô on! " +Cheers Everybody's doing it! Ahh..relief]] +"::No, I won't unrevert your edits!"" ""sounds more like you're writing their MARKETING material!!"" Don't get bossy with me. Or snippy either, Miss religious Bigot! Kindly leave your hatred for Christianity at DailyKos before you log out there and log in over here as a...er...ahem...NPOV editor 99.185.56.156 " +" As Mbz1 showed, the article on the Holocaust in Poland gives that exact wording. The Nazis wiped out Jewish life in Poland, which before the Holocaust was thriving. Jews represented a VERY significant proportion of the population in Poland. After the Holocaust, there were nearly none left. Today, there are still nearly none left. I would say this is the destruction of an entire civilization. The fact that Jews elsewhere were able to spit in the face of Hitler, ""regroup"", and build one of the most advanced and vibrant democracy in the world in Israel, does not change the fact that Polish Jewry was destroyed. " +" Disambiguation Disambiguation link notification Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Whale tail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added links pointing to ABC Radio and Kirsten Price History of aviation in Bangladesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Saidpur It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, Disambiguation link notification Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Indian Plate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added links pointing to South China and Kohistan Indian subcontinent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added links pointing to South China and Kohistan It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, Disambiguation link notification Hi. When you recently edited Jayne Mansfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Too Hot to Handle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, Disambiguation link notification Hi. When you recently edited Jorge Guinle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, Disambiguation link notification Hi. When you recently edited Greater India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this mess +" Can you succeed at being great at something? Indeed. Uh-oh. Major logic complication here. The problem results from the both being eaully ambiguous and dependant on being qualified to be completely understood and debated. In this case, we are looking at ""the greatest driver"". Using statistics and the standard measures by which greatness is gauged in F-1, it become rather elementary in mathematically proving who the greatest is. it's been done, at least twice now: BBC sports and christopher Hilton(well-known biographer of racing legends). The answer was the same for both: Schumacher. The reality is, though, you guys just don't like the answer." +" The Gygax reference is a positive reference, I think. Are you saying he should have said mid-to-late or late instead? The dragon mag stuff is less positive. How about just saying 1976 and getting rid of the mid? It sounds like MA and Gamma World are kinda interchangeable in some people's minds. Maybe that's what Schick meant? How about ""While D&D; is a fantasy roleplaying game, Expedition to the Barrier Peaks introduces science fiction elements into the game, and according to author Lawrence Schick, elements specifically from the Gamma World role-playing game."" - (contribs) " +other hackers read this... get this guy +i want some damn answers now you imbeciles +None of the sources for Farrakhan use charisma in a Weberian sense of the word so they are not valid for this list. +Trigor's edit have erases pointing out that nuclear waste is stored in unprotected place and that is venerable to terror attack in most plants. No offense but that is not truth because this waste has containment and most often it is in reactor containment itself. I have added the link. Also I have added some data about terrorist attacks as well as link. I have pointed out that there is no proof that low level radiation is harmful. I have also pointed out that there are uses for depleted uranium. Please write if you are unpleased with edit. +Regarding your comment on the Norman Lowell discussion page, can you please give me the source of that quotation? Thanks +Annals -> Anals So glad you did that on Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, as I was sorely tempted but didn't want to get into trouble. ) +BE@TKiCKEDiN Query My article was chosen for 'speedy deletion' from Wikipedia because it does not show why the article is important or worthy of being on Wikipedia. I have clearly stated that mr.tinoforever is a famous musician, and YouTuber, who has thousands of subscribers, and has recorded at the World-famous Abbey Road Studios. His music has been released onto iTunes and Lander-Boyce now sells CDs, so I have no idea why this article was chosen. I also worked very hard on it to show Lander-Boyce's biorgaphy and discography. Why? Why? Why? == +'m not sure that the example you gave relates to the double origin topology. For example, the space with the double origin topology, is Hausdorff. I +":::::Its sad to see the obsession by those who wish to remove the massive cultural impact Zeitgeist and the sequels have had. Since it is more ""underground"" this route is a viable scam by those who wish to remove the influence from the internet. The fact is, each movie is a separate idea and they all have no direct relationship to the work being done by TZM. By work, I mean TZM does not promote the movies and the events hold focus only on the RBE stuff. TZM is not a ""fanclub"" of the films and hence any merger is highly misrepresenting of TZM's actual work and ideology " +I personally think it works better in the intro, but that's just me...javascript:insertTags(' ',,) +" Sites that require logins/restrict access Mediafire requires login to upload(not mentioned - can someone add ""Login required to upload files"" to it?). Some sites only let you download files uploaded with the same account. Others require a login to download. Note: Not saying rather the account is free, but that you're forced to log into it." +That used to be an actual template, but now it got deleted. +The whole section needs to be rewritten. 86.29.226.147 +THere you go again. Posting my name and personal info even after buckets suggested you stop. It's not weird or strange. Please stop your slander and harrassment and your insistence on defaming me my project and my intent on wiki, btw. I was out of town and just noticed yesterday your comments while I was away, and am now responding to your posts. Here's the full version: Stop whining, get the fuck out of my life, my business and my art! I don't have time for your shit, your games and your harrassment. I have asked you nicely several time to stop fucking with me, and now it is to the point of really pissing me off. I have repeatedly asked this guy to stop referring to my name, project name in any regard, and have yet again edited his comments that refer specifically to me. I have the right create on my user page in a form of computer/new media art, to comment in whatever language or form I feel free to express in. I have done nothing to the above but request that he not mention my personal info. in his posts, but he insists on continuing this bullshit. I am not editing anonymously as there is no secret as to who I am. Yes, I attempted to expunge my earlier username and still prefer to, but this fucker keeps harassing me and insists on mentioning my name, project and username , all of which refer to personal and private info., and ultimately have turned to slander and libel, after repeated requests for him to stop. My use of language is free speech, I am an atheist, though spiritual I think god is the santa of adults, I don't think fuck is a bad word, nor nigger or white nigger dependent upon use ( see chris rock or george carlin) I was a white nigger for the 6 years that I traveled and painted my way across asia, and it was good. I don't give a shit what a conservative little twat thinks of me or my work, my use or words, symbols and expressions. I have no issue over a few teenagers blacklisting one of my works of art from wikipedia. I do have an issue with the manner by which it was done, the red-neck good 'ol boy behavior of their klan, the hypocrisy of their actions and continued actions. There is no reason for you to delete my use of combined words and symbols, and no reason not to expunge as requested. btw...on the advice of buckets, see comments, I attempted to drop first username and logged in a new one, but these gays kept referring to and using earlier name...so I am responding to discussions that refer to both until this is resolved. As posted by buckets, this is the principle upon which my requests to expunge and remain anonymouys are supported. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia. Such posting can cause offence or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia. If you do not ensure that personal information you posted is removed from this site you may be blocked from editing this site. REMEMBER: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Bucketsofg✐ +IT S PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT RUIN WIKIPEDIA (Faradayplank) GO SUCK A FAT ONE!!! +You're welcome. The list still needs a major cleanup though. Removing Los Banos alumni should be prioritized. I can't do it myself for now though since I'm still cleaning up another list. +(Florian Schwarz, 21:35, 19 Feb 2006 (UTC)) +Tebriz in Turkish. +Bud, do simran and don't bother me again. +" Seriously. The blame the victim bullshit here has to stop. Or have you not noticed that saying anything about Malleus in any way is met with heaps of abuse and bullshit? It doesn't matter how one says it; once you're on his ""I will shit on you at every opportunity"" list, you're fucked. Check this out for an example of what I mean. Malleus simply cannot resist taking any opportunity to belittle people. And yet when we respond or make the mistake of telling the fucking truth, we get punished (and seriously, don't bother giving me any claptrap bullshit about blocks being preventive; they're punitive and you know it, otherwise unblocks would be swift and frequent). There's a giant fucking problem here, and blaming the victim instead of the instigator makes it worse and worse and worse. →  ₪ " +Your edits to Whissendine +It might do me well to think about Czech grammar as a subject and reorganize the material. I built the section as it is mostly by condensing and citing text that was already there and divided into copious subsections. Thanks for the time. +Peer review link.... ... +":First of all, ""girl"" has a hard G. Secondly, I'm American and I've never heard anyone say anything other than ""Yeeros."" 128.211.198.168 " +" What are you referring to? I don't see anything there. North8000 " +" Some more random bits and pieces ...also has the Stephen Fry version been mention in the context of the adult audience?. Horrible Histories is one of the smartest comedies on TV Is 'Horrible Histories' suitable for adults? Horrible Histories to be remade for adult audience [BBC Should Consider More Kids Content, Review Finds BBC Should Consider More Kids Content, Review Finds] CREATE A SATIRE WITH HORRIBLE HISTORIES EXPLORE HISTORY WITH HORRIBLE HISTORIES ""it wasnt until the cbbc sketch show horrible histories began to get wider acclaim that historical comedy on tv started to thaw out"" ""TV’s funniest historical comedy since Blackadder, Horrible Histories achieves the improbable feat of making children leap for the Xbox’s off-switch and settle down for half an hour’s learning."" ""The popular Horrible Histories books, which have been turned into the funniest comedy series on TV, were slated for celebrating and trivialising violence, even though I thought that was the point of them."" Horrible History’s a hoot... < this seems like a good one Horrible Histories: Or, How Children's TV Grew Up in a Hurry Horrible Histories: comedy for all ages" +Then please refrain from making unfounded accusations against me. I don't know how you got tangled up in this in the first place, so please go back to fiddling with whatever it is you fiddle with. I've given you enough chances. Cheers, +13:46, 13 November 2011 +Lead I would suggest that the lead be reduced. It is longer than wp guidance suggests, and far longer than, for example, the Fort Hood shootings lead. +I am at school kids here all use the same ip +Yep There is really no point in adding warnings considering 10's of thousands of students use this proxy supplied by the education department and frankly it would be to much bother for the schools to enforce on this one website since they most likely dont care. -Student +" Overseas If you fill out I-129F while overseas, is it possible to submit it to the proper authorities? I am confused as the state.gov website states that we may not file it at USCIS or embassy while abroad. And when sending the proper forms (that require a ""filing fee"") do we send by cash, check or what? I've also noticed that the amounts supposed to be paid tend to vary from page to page, is this a tech issue or are they separate payments? 112.81.1.97 " +Nope, I'm not much of a content-wikipedian, I merely reverted vandalism to it. The unicode was already there, but on reverting my browser changed it from UTF-8 literals to html character entities, which isn't much of an improvement but at least made it valid Latin-1. (t) 03:25, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC) +" he swears all over the place and gets no warnings, my brother got banned for calling someone a ""troll"" wikipedia biased!! (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((not that i care i quit this nasty place )" +I don't compare people to Hitler because that is pointless, because no one is like Hitler. You are an evil nazi, but you're not a Hitler-like evil nazi. User:Iamzodyourzodeveryzod +No one contributed to the page. It was I who created them. Admin asked for their deletion. +" (UTC) I'm not sure the person at ""Pop Matters"" knows what Dark Ambient is. A Lustmord album this is not. 17:04, 22 August 2014" +" How to respond to a speedy deletion request I have placed a speedy deletion notice on an article that you have recently created. I have done this because the subject of the article does not appear to be notable. The speedy deletion notice does not necessarily mean that the article will be deleted. If you believe that it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines please put a notice on the article's talk page (following the instructions on the deletion notice) indicating why you believe the article should not be deleted. You can then discuss the matter with other editors who can help you if the subject is indeed notable. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Harry Let us have speaks " +" Advice on Portal:Jurassic Park: Hi Firs. I recently found the mentioned portal after it was placed in the related portals section of the dino portal. I checked it out & saw it had a number of problems which were in violation of the fair use policy among others. Firstly, none of the pictures on the portal (all of which are fair use) have fair use rationale. I expressed this to the user (User:Cuddly Panda) who has been the sole contributor of the portal with no reply. On closer inspection, it seems the user has been uploading & adding fair use images to wikipedia for some time now, possibly upwards of a year, & despite numerous warning from automated bots etc, has now seemed to learn from this or the links provided or ceased their image infringements. Just check out the user's talk page - nearly every message is a message about the misuse of uploads. In addition to this, the portal is very poor in quality, unmaintained and relies heavily on unfree images and poor portal sections (some of which have already been nominated for deletion). So I wanted to ask you what action I could take next. There's a few options: 1) Obviously the user is not listening to warnings & my messages, so could I possibly bring this up at the administrator's noticeboard? They could then decide what to do next. 2) Since sections of the JP Portal are being nomianted for deletion already, I could potentially nominate the whole portal at MfD with a vote of ""no opinion"". This would see what other editors think of the portal & even if it is kept, the portal's fair use pictures problem would still be sorted out by the end of the nomiantion. 3) I'll probably do this anyway, but the user is on Editor Review & I could also place a note there explaining what the user is doing wrong & how to remedy this. So, I'd personally like to do all three, but if you can think of something else & help me decide which of those, if any, to carry out, it would be appreciated. I'll post this to another admin just to get a second opinion as well. Cheers, " +Are you stalking me? You seem to have a comment on everything I post and that seems weird. +" 1948 vs.1984 The article cites a source that says Orwell derived the title by inverting the year ""1948"". Do you know if it was ever published with that title, or placed in print, in any form whatsoever? " +Please do not interfere in my affair. Mind your own business . You are responsible for this .Now i am facing losses just because of what you did . So please . I don't need your help. I don't intend to harm you , and i never did . And i think even you should try to do the same . Wikipedia is not your property . +On your poorly researched (it should have taken you an hour or two to read through the raw data on Underwood) response You're talking to the wrong guy. Not only did I not start any editwars. I didn't initiate any personal attacks either, I used the talk page the way it is supposed to be utilized, to initiate discussion on the subject of an influential person to the Church of the SubGenius. Someone who at bare minimum is a church in-joke and at maximum had a chilling effect on a number of the members. I suppose you are off to edit DooM out of the article on the Columbine Killings as it was released several years before the killings happened and there is no direct causal relationship between it and the killings, only people who claim there is a causal link. Kevin Underwood affected the church. Nearly every member of note has an opinion on the booger, and all you have to do is mention Underwood on the talk page to get swarmed by Church member caretakers and hack attacks (a variety of these have taken place in the last few days while discussing editing the article, from blocking of the page entirely, to abnormal (10 minutes or more) page load times, to apparent deletion of talk points after loading the page.) What you have here is a page zealously defended by a bunch of nuts who are so zealous about their complete disassociation from Underwood despite comments by Church co-creator Ivan Stang regarding him AND conversations with him, that the protestations are evidence themselves of his effect on the Church. That said, notice I haven't made any edits on the article. Just responded on the talk page to your unjust accusations. Far politer than was deserved. 71.102.18.173 +Dance-pop Greetings Nick. I would like to register a complaint against a user. He/she is registered to IP address: 68.89.176.172. I see that you had blocked him/her previously. Anyhow, he/she keeps making unwarranted (or unreferenced) changes to the Wiki entry on Dance-pop. I realize that any and all Wiki articles are open to additions, subtractions etc., but this person keeps adding Soulja Boy, who ISN'T technically dance-pop. I wouldn't have a problem if he'd come into the talk page and discuss it; I added a talk subject to the Dance-pop page for duscussion, but he/she never responds, they just keep adding it. What should I do about this person? They seem to have vandalized a LOT of articles! Thanks. (Mirror Ball ) +User 74.92.27.193 Since your block of Special:Contributions/74.92.27.193 on the 21st of January, that IP has made 8 more disruptive edits, all reverted by bots or users. That IP was previously blocked on the 18th of November 2010. In all, the user has ignored 11 warnings or blockages to make 31 disruptive edits, all reverted by bots or users, and has made no constructive edits at all, other than a promise to not do it again, after which came the majority of vandalism: 26 more disruptive edits. Copy of this notice sent to +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  WikiProject Mixed martial arts article improvement drive Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts is now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive! Please add your input to decide what our first collaboration should be. +. A quick look online will reveal that other than the g.i joe character an the Wii peripheral, the vast majority of material (books, instructional dvds) use the correct spelling +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! +" I'll have to take a closer look at the current version of the article, because I have an uneasy feeling that the answer actually is found in one of the subsidiary articles, such as Lydian mode. The short answer is that the connection between the Greek harmoniai and the medieval modes is more tenuous than you appear to believe, and the connection between medieval and modern modes is fairly straightforward. The ""modern system"" is actually that of Common Practice Tonality, and ""modal"" usage within that context begins to establish itself as a separate idea during the 18th century. The chief difference from medieval practice is a more rigid adherence to the diatonic notes of the scale. For example, in the medieval system, there is no practical difference between the Lydian scale and what we call the major scale, or between the Dorian and what we call the minor scale. In order to differentiate ""modal flavor"" from the chromatic flexibility of the upper half of the minor scale, for example, it became necessary to insist on always using the minor-seventh scale degree, especially in ascent to the tonic, and the sixth degree had to be always major to identify Dorian, and always minor to identify Aeolian. No such practice existed up to the 16th century, and indeed it was only with Glareanus in the mid-16th century that a theoretical difference was made between Dorian and Aeolian on the one hand, and Lydian and Ionian on the other. I shall see what I can do to clear this up (using reliable sources, of course).— " +I'm changing this entry from a List of Thracian tribes to more like an article about Thracian tribes, which will mention/list pretty much all tribes. +Shah of Iran I have thought about what you have said regarding uncited material and I agree with you, so I have started deleting large portion of the entry on The Shah of Iran because it is uncited. I am then going to start with other Wikipedia entries and delete all uncited material. I really don't know where to start, so I think I will start with the subjects that you have been adding to. Thanks for teaching me something about Wikipedia, i.e. that all uncited material has to be deleted. Only cited material can be allowed to be put up. Thank you. +Please excuse me if my writing is not elaborate, as my first laungage is not English. +Why? I understand that you are a successful individual that thrives on success as you have so strongly expressed through your impeccable academic accolades. However, I strongly consider you to read about the great Nilliam Townsiris, and how much he went through while still able to express his brilliance through the phenomenal work of his writing. The article is still under construction and our team is finding all the remaining references. If you are an administrator, please let your fellow administrators know about the construction of this article. +Yes, this article has those problems and will be soon gone or expanded by many editors from not only South Kora but also from other countries of East Asia, I guess. +updates this list is quite old. Many regiments have been closed down, I delete them consequently. +you suck, just kidding +" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.149.170 " +Why Exactly why was my old username (iv_admin20) blocked? It said it was rude or inflammatory. I expect an explanation right now. +Well, you could have saved some talkpage space if you had said that in your first post. +Figured out that adds an archive template to the current talk page, but what does do? — +I say that he lacks integrity because he lacks integrity. My accusations are grounded in reality. What pits editor against editor is the piss-poor job admins are doing. Your colleagues have aided Aussie and Alex in their disruption, which precipitated my own frustration. The well is poisoned by people like Aussie and Alex who regard Wikipedia as some sort of my WP:MMORPG; they have contributed absolutely nothing of value to the discussion. +Welcome! Hello, 24.12.187.164, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +Youtube link Hi, You just removed the youtube link I put for a derivation of Kepler's equation. Did you see my discussions with the previous editor? Boaz Katz, +" Tidbit for Bunch of Grapeshot ""Give them a whif of the grapes""... ""Also, Hawaii has such reports (Grant 1996:147). Grant, Glen, The Obake Files, Mutual Publishers, 1996, ISBN 1566471001 "" (bigfoot) editing fool" +Question about citation/reference style(s) In my recent history here, I have really had a lot of fun filling out every possible option that was available to me in the various citation templates perhaps too much fun even (recently I added some wiki syntax to the citations for an article and it increased that article by at least one kilobyte); it was an exercise in fun, not in my opinion about citation style. I mention that now because I am interested to know about how citations like this one work. The strengths and weaknesses or what is gained and what is lost. There is a quote contained in the reference/citation style, but it can only be seen in edit mode (I think). I am confused and I was unsuccessful when I attempted to reference that way. Thanks carol +America is not United States, please you don't call thoom. America no es Estados Unidos ¡¡¡Entiendanlo!!! +Three edits to Gold rush to include graffiti and a page deletion Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. +" I absolutely agree the article should not be about the blog. I am not proposing to introduce a paragraph, merely one sourced sentence: ""the SPLC maintains a blog whose mission statement is 'Keeping an Eye on the Radical Right"". Step back for a minute and look at this page, reconsider your accusation of tendentious. I am not the only person arguing for this position. I did not even start this particular discussion. I am starting to question whether your interest is to whitewash any mention of the political orientation of the SPLC. The fact that political orientation is important to the SPLC is notable. An encyclopedia should document notable things about the SPLC. The SPLC documents this about itself. The question is why do you keep trying to block statements about the SPLC by the SPLC? Do you believe the SPLC is swayed by poltical orientation?218.186.8.245 " +" Look, obviously you can't use this account, and doesn't want to - it should be deleted. T " +"|decline=We do not care for ""opinions"" such as this. Your reason for your unblock request is completely inadequate. — }} " +I got interrupted a few times, so something less than 20 minutes. No tools, just FireFox with multiple tabs, a text editor to accumulate items by Alt-Tabbing back and forth, and WP:POPUPS to verify the vandalism by mere hovering. —EncMstr (talk) +SUPERFLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ps: Curtis Mayfield composed SUPERFLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY's soundtrack +Please read the entire section, and see how primary sources can be properly used. There is no need to insistently defend this poor review. Please see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for the proper GA criteria. +So this could be the start of a long-term issue between us. +Thanks for your support I am leaving. +whisperback The whisperback template works like '''this. Thanks for the notice. – talk +"suck it asshats Hurricane Expert Reconsiders Global Warming Link Prominent MIT hurricane scientist Kerry Emanuel has publicly reversed his view regarding global warming's alleged impact on hurricanes. “The [computer] models are telling us something quite different from what nature seems to be telling us,"" said Emanuel, whose views on hurricanes and global warming have been prominently cited by Al Gore and other promoters of climate change fear. He told the New York Times. ""There are various interpretations possible: The big increase in hurricane power over the past 30 years or so may not have much to do with global warming, or the models are simply not faithfully reproducing what nature is doing. Hard to know which to believe yet.” In 2005, a few weeks before Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, Emmanuel asserted in a paper that he had found statistical evidence linking rising hurricane energy and global warming. His conversion is a very important new development in the climate debate, said Marc Morano, a top aide to climate change skeptic Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. ""First, 2007 turned out to be the ‘tipping point’ for global warming fears, and 2008 appears to be the year of vindication for skeptics as many prominent scientists reverse their climate views, more and more skeptical scientists speak out, and new data debunks man-made climate fears. “Now another major scientist reconsiders his views on a significant aspect of man-made climate fears.” " +- As long as the spelling remains the same, I do not know what is the problem, letters are letters, may be in French, he has the point, but see the paradox here, wrong birthday is ok, but everything else... wow, must be corect... more ..90% + of all Poles celebrate his b-day on 2 22!Duh! +I dont give a flying fuck if youre nice or not, that is completely irrelvant. Take your admin powers and stick them up your ass you fool. You are entirely ignorant of the aramic language and its history so I suggest you get off your high horse you mongrel. If you had any knowledge of the language which you clearly dont you would have not done this. Chaldeans are relgious group that speak arabic. I attend a chaldean church and we never speak neo- armaic the vast majoirty of the churches speak arabic with very few (almost none-existent) neo-aramaic words. +" CBDunkerson, I hope this comment on my own talk page is not considered intervention. (I see I've been unblocked.) I did not mean to suggest that MONGO was purposely inserting information as part of his job. The only reason I said ""I would not be surprised"", is because this has been going on for a while now and Wikipedia has not stopped it. What else am I to think? (Although I admit to not being familiar with Wikipedia's procedures.) Still, that comment by me is nothing compared to what MONGO's been getting away with. (Also just noticed this btw.) Wikipedia is supposed to be NPOV which is why MONGO should steer clear of the 9/11 pages. An examination of the exchanges between MONGO and myself here is a good example: MONGO seems content with personal attacks: ""who cares how many misguided folks there are"". His comments are clearly ad hominem personal attacks towards me, and many others. The following, from this page, shows he's content with namecalling as well. I removed an external link to a namecalling site, MONGO reverts me leaving the following statement: I like this weblink...it summaries things quite well I apologize for any insinuations on my part, but also must stress my own attempts at a NPOV. I'm sure we all agree, from MONGO's own statements here that he is neither apologetic nor neutral: ""The POV pushers that try to add nonsense to the articles related to the 9/11 events have been told repeatedly that the vast majority of their ""contributions"" to those article violated numerous policies. This doesn't seem to stop them. This editor I blocked routinely reverts those that support the concensus verison and yes, conspiracy theorists is what they are...they are not researchers. Simply put, and I won't apologize for this not being more civil, I will continue to block POV pushers that disrupt the discussion pages and the articles with nonsense. Two other admins responded to the unblock request and did not unblock this editor. I then moved the early parts of this conversation from an article talk page to here for all to see. It is ludicrus to assume that I was doing anything other than to ensure that the POV pushers of nonsense know that there is a limit to the level of disruption that needs to be tolerated."" If MONGO calls this paper, which has been peer reviewed by two physicists before being accepted for publication in a book, ""nonsense"", obviously he is not NPOV " +The Cheetah Girls 3 from the Disney Channel Original Movies. It's been confirmed, they're working on researching India and Bollywood RIGHT NOW and they start rehearsals in like November, and begin shooting in January. Then they will film through March and the film will be another SO HOT SUMMER thing. +" WP:RFBRC IMAGE UPLOADED at Image:Pedro BRC.jpg. May I?  Chat  " +. Helmolt: 1901. Old and again not reliable. Albania didn't even exist at that time. 5 +I have no problem with anti-Masonic links that are founded in fact. On the other hand, links that are built around innuendo, hearsay, and frauds for which the author actually took responsibility have no place in an encyclopedia. 21:00, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC) +"Here is the quote from the Izel Jenkins page on Wikipedia: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izel_Jenkins) ""Jenkins acquired the nickname of ""Toast"", due to fans and commentators believing he gave up too many big pass plays (or colloquially being ""burnt"" - hence ""toast"") to opposing wide receivers, often leading to large gains and touchdowns by the other team."" Please explain how this differs from the ""Mamula'd"" reference... The quote above could easily be rearranged to fit the Mamula scenario. " +Last warning to you, Zanimum! Any more talkback, and you will suffer at my merciless wrath! +Rankings Based on each country's average IQ, it should be readily apparent to just about anyone that the numeric rankings are incorrect. For instance, Australia, Denmark, France, Mongolia, and the USA are all tied for 9th. The ranking system punishes countries based on alphabetization. 67.181.165.220 43 year old American male, IQ 147 +" OpenSXCE disappeared - how to resurrect it Hey Mark, I read a surprising comment about OpenSXCE ""software (linux distribution) article of unclear notability, lacking independent references"". OpenSXCE was never a Linux distribution. I suspect I may have contributed to the wikipedia article in the past, at some level, and I was getting ready to re-contribute to the article again (since a new release was pending) - when I found OpenSXCE deleted. OpenSXCE is not Linux based, but is based upon forked Open Sourced Solaris source code released by Sun Microsystems, but re-closed by Oracle. Linux and OpenSXCE have disjoint licensing criteria, meaning the kernel software is illegal to mix. The OpenSXCE's roots are pre-Linux, with decades of history. There was a rename & rebranding from MarTux to OpenSXCE, which may have caused some confusion. Notability: There was a variety of OpenSolaris splinter distributions, one splinter is the basis of one of Gartner Magic Quadrant for cloud providers. OpenSXCE is the only current Open Source splinter that runs under SPARC architecture. SPARC architecture is a unique open CPU architecture supported by multiple vendors, currently the fastest CPU architecture on the market today, running the fastest non-clustered machines in the market today, and recently powered the fastest super-computer in the world for nearly 12 months running. OpenSXCE marks one of 3 currently supported OS's (Oracle Solaris, Fujitsu Linux, open source OpenSXCE) which runs under SPARC systems. OpenSXCE is the only Open Source OS today, running under this Open Architecture, which is not supported a by commercial vendor. OpenSXCE releases had been reviewed by multiple technical web sites in the past. I have been in the computing profession for over a quarter century, an expert in some areas, a novice in others. While I do not contribute to this Open Source project, I am very aware of it's unique value in Open Source, open CPU Architectures and High-End systems. I don't have a lot of spare time, but make some when something notable appears. I am not an expert in Wikipedia markup, but have contributed for some time. I really don't have the time to be re-creating articles of significance, but it is significant enough that I am willing to re-create this page. What is the process to resurrected the old page, or would I [unfortunately] need to re-create a new page? " +Stop with the warnings! I find them deeply offensive. +" 4 minor charges comment cruelty to children, intimidation of a court official,jumping bail and fleeing the country and assault of a police officer, ""relatively minor charges"" to you, just wanted to point that out ) take care " +" Orphaned non-free media (Image:ParamountParks.png) Thanks for uploading Image:ParamountParks.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand " +" Bastard Child Does anyone know if Obama was born out of wedlock, and is a ""bastard"" child? 24.27.130.12 " +No Apology? So, I don't even deserve an apology for the false accusation you made against me?75.104.127.83 +" In References, ^ ""Academy Awards Database"". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 2007-11-03. now goes to their default Tomcat home page, created after Tomcat setup. Someone who is familiar with what the reference was supposed to link to may want to replace the linkage. " +Home == Hey Doc, i know where you live! i will come by and bring some friends to fix you something. Let's barbeque and relax! == +"font>]] (bananabucket) Fair use rationale for Image:Logdelhi.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Logdelhi.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Russian and Indian economies If you check the the numbers, you will see that on most economical measures Russia has a larger GDP than India, such as nominal GDP. As nominal GDP represents total market value, it is most frequently used when talking about superpowers. India has a larger PPP GDP, but Russia has a much higher per capita GDP than India in both categories. Overall, Russia has a higher HDI index. Your statement that India has a higher GDP than Russia is accurate in only a narrow sense and based on a single GDP calculation. 71.112.145.211 India is way ahead of Russia in terms of GDP (PPP) (see List of countries by GDP (PPP)) and just behind Russia in terms of GDP (nominal) (see List of countries by GDP (nominal)). We are talking over here national economies and not just economy from per capita perspective. Also, India has a higher GDP growth rate than Russia (see List of countries by GDP (real) growth rate) and according to BRIC report, India's GDP (nominal) will be four times that of Russia's by 2050 and that is a very important factor considering this is an article on potential superpowers. India is not way ahead of Russia, Russia is way ahead of India. Everything in India is Russian suchs as military arsenals, rockets, missiles, fight jets, commercial jets, ships, subs and etc. Russia is a superpower and India is not quite a superpower. There are many reasons why Russia is a superpower and that is a long discussion. Russia is the number military forces in the world and the worlds largest military arsenal builder. India is a big population and smart people but Russia is has unique things about it that India hasn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.129.197.69 The bigger issue here, however, is those little bar charts. You can provide your input in this new post I've started Talk:Potential_superpowers#Bar_charts.71.112.145.211 Vandalism this action here is considered vandalism. A consensus had been reached to name the page. Please refrain from unilaterally moving the page again without proposing a move. (Roger - Out) If sticking to a Wikiproject guideline is considered vandalism then you need to familiarize yourself more with Wikipedia's rules mate. Exactly it's a guideline not a rule, there are exceptions to the guideline, even the project mentions it. There was a consensus on the name and my point here is that you are trying to ignore the consensus and impose your personal interpretation mate. '(Roger - Out) Firstly, that consensus'' you are talking about was reached by only two editors including you. Secondly, exception is when the title does not sound phonetically correct for example ""Anglo-Indo relations"", ""Franco-Indo relations"", ""Sino-Indo relations"". Also note that ""Indo-"" is a norm when linking anything to India or the Indian subcontinent. For example, Indo-Aryans, Indo-Iranian languages, Indo-European languages, indologist, indology, +Showing notability There are a few things you'd have to do in order to show that the band meets WP:BAND. First off, the band would have to have received coverage in reliable sources such as a newspaper or a music website or magazine that we'd consider reliable. Examples of what would be considered a reliable source would be something along the lines of a review by a staff member of AllMusic, a review by a magazine such as Pitchfork, or a newspaper article such as this one. We absolutely must have this sort of coverage in order to show that a band passes notability guidelines. WP:PRIMARY sources such as press releases, band websites, or the like do not count towards notability. Also, be wary of blog sources, as most blogs do not count towards notability. It's mostly because the vast majority of them do not have an editorial board that is established enough for us to be able to verify them. If you want, you can run sourcing through Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, a noticeboard full of people that can tell you if a source is usable or not. (｡◕‿◕｡) +"::::::From the rationales I'm reading here, I don't think ""most"" supporters of the current version consider this to be a minor tweak, but arguendo let's assume they do. A reasonable argument could have been made to these editors that, as you see a large problem with the proposed edit, and as they see negligible benefit, they might want to stand aside rather than support the change. That's a delicate argument to make and requires a high level of trust among the editors involved. I don't see any evidence of that trust here, and so I'm not surprised that argument wasn't successful. Now that we've moved from persuasion to determining where the consensus lies, no, it is not appropriate to disregard an opinion because an editor considers the edit in question to be minor. It is even less appropriate to raise this after several opinions have been posted. tc " +" I always stick to the facts. Forget the Magyarisation terms. and now a little summary of your claim (try to concentrate): There was full education in language X (like in Slovakia, Romania, Serbia, Croatia) and the government saw that (and this is your claim and is not true, because the same would apply to the neighbouring countires) the minorities start to lose their language. As a result it decided to restrict education in language X (you say to a few subjects, I say de-facto to 2 hours a week - but it does not matter), because there was ""no need"" to teach some subjects in their language (which is a sociolinguistic non-sense). This is an illogical and actually chauvinist statement. What any normal government should do in such situation (wrongly claimed by you) is AT LEAST not restrict education in the language. Secondly, bilingual schools are no minority schools. Minority schools are only schools were the full language of education is the given language. Therefore the minority schools were literally shut down. This holds by definition and cannot be subject to any exaggeration. " +Shut the hell up JeremyA stop posting nonsense. +Sure. Suryabhandu made a reference stating that 'my muslims' were slaughtered at he hands of Rajputs and questioned my faith commitment. I read various other points of his in also such an intellectually poor and abusive manner and therefore told him I wasn't proud of his but my own ancestors who even he respects through the various texts they aided to provide. I called him Suryabhandar in poor fashion, but not as a first, but in response to his. If I am a due a ban for this then I will not argue with the admins, I should've known better for falling for his bait. His reply was a little OTT, especially considering my ancestors are reverred so much by them to. - Raja +" I'm nearly certain that Scott Thornton didn't become an alternate captain until Craig Conroy was traded to Calgary. I sure can't recall him wearing the ""A"" on his jersey before that moment, and I also thought I heard on a Kings telecast shortly after the Conroy trade Bob Miller and Jim Fox talking about how he's now wearing the ""A"" on his jersey, leading me to believe that he assumed that role after the trade. I'm not gonna reflect my opinion in the article; I thought I'd leave a cimment here, first. '''''' " +Neologisms Hi there, a while ago you made an edit on the Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms guideline. I am proposing a revision to the guideline and I'm soliciting your comments. You can find the link to my rewrite at Wikipedia talk:Avoid neologisms +A few comments about some criteria: x.5: Instead of giving half a point, give two points. Criteria #1.5: Maybe it would be better to give one point for organization that are 5+ years old and two points for those that are 10+? I also think that there should be a criteria which takes the number of ranked fighters of an organizations into account. Since the main problem with such a criteria is to determine which ranking to use, I recommend using the Fight Matrix rankings. Most of the other rankings only go to the 10th place, while with Fight Matrix we could take into account the first 25 athletes of each weight. Also, historic ranks are readily available. +FUCK YOURSELVES NAZI MODERATORS +" 6,500 shiny rubles! I remember you gave me a barnstar for making 2000 edits. I've passed that amount by a multiple of 3! Very excited. 1234 " +" You fail to understand what is disruptive and also what is NPOV. We can not continue to include in this article only the Palestinian POV. I understand that in your view to say ""palestinian have a right"" is one POV and to say ""israel govrement object the Palestinian right"" is the other POV. Such an approch will not lead us forward. " +Thank you for the clarification. Actually, I think you put that really well, you might want to put that in the article itself! +" WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM!!!! It had been six years since we had graduated from college, and for the first time since graduation, all three of us were together again. From the enthusiastic hugs at the airport and then the conversation and laughter during the dinner we shared at a local restaurant on the way to my home, it was clear that while plenty of time had passed and we had kept in contact, the comfort and attraction between the three of us when all together in the same physical location was still undeniable. Having returned to my cozy, semi-secluded home in the suburbs, we all sat in the living room, sipping wine and continuing the tales of our lives. With the exceptions of the location – a house – and the presence of alcohol, it could have been any of our final two years of college together: The three of us, tight-knit friends-with-benefits, sitting and chatting and sharing a drink together. Then, Justine and Beth had been roommates while I lived in another dorm across the main quad; now, they were much-welcomed guests who had fortunately been able to clear time in their hectic schedules to come and visit me for a weekend. As I sat in the recliner and took another sip of wine, I allowed my eyes to truly linger on Justine as she told Beth about a recent situation at work. The Florida sun had certainly added a glow to Justine's skin, and may have also been responsible for the lighter shade of her shoulder-length brown hair. As when we were in college together, she wore virtually no make-up, just a thin gloss upon her lips – an enticing strawberry flavor, as I had discovered upon meeting her at the airport earlier in the evening – and red fingernails. Her red dress was indeed elegant, with a plunging sequined neckline that permitted a very welcome display of her cleavage, a display which Beth and I both certainly appreciated. The long slit up the skirt of the dress revealed that she was wearing stockings held up by a garter belt, one of its descending white straps definitely noticeable against the well-toned thigh. The red heels provided enough of a contrast for the white stockings to truly attract the eyes. Surprisingly, however, she wore hoop earrings, something she had never worn during college for fear that they would pull at her ears and widen the piercing holes more than was considered safe. The conversation turned back toward me, but a few minutes later, the two beautiful young women were again chatting primarily to each other. I took the opportunity to once again study Beth, and was equally impressed. While noticeably shorter than Justine, Beth was also paler in complexion, a testament to living in northern Canada ever since graduation and spending virtually every waking moment inside to conduct her research. As in college, Beth preferred the color black for her outfits: a somewhat-tight sweater, form-fitting slacks, and a pair of low heels. Four tiny earrings adorned each ear, plus she bore a small sparkling stud against her left nostril. Beth's black hair flowed over her shoulders and down her front, and she absently twirled several strands around a finger as she listened to Justine. It felt so good to be in their presence once again. Especially since all three of us had been in several failed relationships since graduating from college, I was thankful that I had thought to invite them to spend the weekend with me. I had absolutely no doubt that our chatter would eventually give way to intimacy, but for now, I was quite content to simply sit back in the recliner and openly admire the two stunning beauties perched upon the sofa. The intimacy began when we finally went to bed... together. I was on my back under the covers, with a very feminine head resting softly upon each shoulder. An arm wrapped around each of them, I held the two women close to me as they absently stroked my bare chest, dipped a finger into my navel, brushed my thighs through the sweatpants I typically wore to bed, caressed my stiffening manhood. My eyes closed, I reveled in their touches: inherently familiar, yet full of rediscovery due to the lengthy passage of time. No words were needed. And as their hands occasionally made contact with each other upon me, I smiled to myself in the darkness, having always enjoyed watching Beth and Justine in their own intimate encounters. But eventually, their touches slowed and ultimately ceased, their breathing falling into the regularity associated with sleep. I stayed awake a little longer, immensely enjoying the closeness with two of the people who had been most important in my life. I awoke in the morning to the scent of French Roast coffee, faint yet unmistakable. Justine was gone, clearly the one who had brewed the morning nectar, while Beth and I held each other as she slept. The feel of her pajama-covered breasts against me was a welcome sensation, as it h +That's stupid. It wasn't our fault, some dumb people just did a bit of blanking, there was nothing malicious this time. Should have been a shorter block. +" Ah, but ""when most people believed the earth was flat, it was flat."" is a good description in this case, but it could be critized by people claiming it to be false is only objectively false, not subjectively false. ) " +Unofficial request for comment about co-founder/sole founder dispute Co-founder/sole founder dispute rumbles Wikipedia 04:51, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) List of Auburn University people ‎ (→Alumni: nothing to do with co founder dispute which it was removed last year) 04:50, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Huntsville, Alabama ‎ (→Notable residents and famous natives: nothing to do with the dispute) 04:48, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) 1966 ‎ (Undid revision 292265427 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:48, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Dopplr ‎ (Undid revision 292265970 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:48, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Birla Institute of Technology and Science ‎ (Undid revision 292266526 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:48, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Kelley School of Business ‎ (Undid revision 292272282 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:48, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! episodes (2006) ‎ (Undid revision 292320956 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:47, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) American School in Japan ‎ (→Misc. Info: article has no relation to co-founder dispute) 04:46, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Society for Technical Communication ‎ (Undid revision 292369674 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:46, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Criticism of Microsoft ‎ (Undid revision 292369754 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:46, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) PR-e-Sense ‎ (Undid revision 292369952 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:46, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Diplopedia ‎ (Undid revision 292370091 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:45, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) June 1, 2005 ‎ (Undid revision 292370239 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:45, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Poduniversal ‎ (Undid revision 292370021 by QuackGuru (talk)) 04:44, 26 May 2009 (hist | diff) Hot Press ‎ (nothing to do with the co-founder dispute come on QG you know better Undid revision 292369868 by QuackGuru (talk)) 05:13, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Hot Press ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:13, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Poduniversal ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:13, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) June 1, 2005 ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) (top) 05:12, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Society for Technical Communication ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:12, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Criticism of Microsoft ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:09, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) American School in Japan ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:08, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) List of Auburn University people ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:08, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Dopplr ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:08, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) 1966 ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:07, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! episodes (2006) ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:07, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Birla Institute of Technology and Science ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) 05:06, 4 June 2009 (hist | diff) Kelley School of Business ‎ (making false statements isnt helpful) After the content dispute was over an editor went back to several articles and rewrote history (revisionism). The editor previously acknowledged Jimmy Wales is historically cosidered the co-founder of Wikipedia. +Disambiguation? Why does this article currently redirect from Pygmy Shrew? As there is another article about the Eurasian Pygmy Shrew, which is also commonly referred to as the Pygmy Shrew. Do we need a Disambiguation page? I've also added a link to the European one, as there was previously no mention of it. +" Super Mario RPG lists You asked why List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars was redirected to Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars in Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars. I have restored the list of locations, and we are discussing it on its talk page. Could you please take a look? If you have time, please also look at List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and Smithy Gang. Thanks! Currently, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars has two lists pertaining to it (List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, and List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). User:TTN decided it would be best to merge the lists into the main article and split Smithy Gang into those articles. I recently merged Smithy Gang into the list of chatacters by removing the non-notable characters, and I have asserted that a cameo section in the list of characters is valid, per Wikipedia:Trivia sections and Wikipedia:Handling trivia that uses Alex Trebek#Cameos as a good example. I have suggested that we rename the articles per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves to something along the lines of Characters of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and World of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars or Mushroom Kingdom (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars) just like Characters of Final Fantasy VIII and World of Final Fantasy VI or Gaia (Final Fantasy VII). I believe if these articles are to evolve beyond a non-notable list, they should be renamed. For example, List of Final Fantasy VII locations was merged into Gaia (Final Fantasy VII), because a World article is notable, but a simple list of locations is not. That is why there are other secions of the article to make it a World article. It simply has not been renamed yet. TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of Equinox to the main article, TTN removed it since my souce was ""the opinions of the Nintendo Power player's guide writers"". Although it was actually Nintendo Power magazine, I do believe a magazine is a reliable source, and I gave a page from Next Generation Magazine which also said the same thing. In addition, I was surprized that TTN said that it was from the players guide, since he claims to own the players guide for the game. He has not verified this, since I asked him for citations in May, ""Could you look in the back of the Player's Guide and tell me what “types” of … Magic? I forgot what they call it in the game … well, anyways, what types of Special Attack or whatever it is (actually, could you find out what it's called?) there are? I remember some vaguely when I owned the guide like “Fire”, “Jump”, “Electricity?”, etc. Could you provide a citation, like the page number with a quote in context?"" TTN replied that he was going to ""get to it"" (User talk:TTN/Archive 5#List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). TTN claims the player's guide is ""at the bottom of a box that's behind at least five others in a cramped space"". Seeing that TTN did not recognize that the page was not from the player's guide when I provided a scan of the page in question from Nintendo Power shocked me. However, I have continued to assume good faith by not questioning TTN's honesty. Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's. Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves. Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media. Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters Write the concept and creation section for the main article TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow tha +" After seeing your photos, I second this award. You deserve it. cheers | My Talk " +How do you create a project? Because i'm trying to start a Downtown Charleston (WV)project +I have started to put CN tags for films. But there is a lot of work. +" As near as I can tell, wikipedia has no article on ""cycle structure"". The cycle structure of an element g of a permutation group is the multi-set of sizes of orbits of the cyclic group generated by g. This is related to the cycle decomposition of g when g only has finite orbits, which takes orbit representatives a1, a2, ... and specifies g by (a1, a1^g, a1^(g^2), ... )(a2, a2^g, ...) where each tuple has no duplicate entries. This is also called ""cycle notation"", and the ""cycle structure"" is the list of cycle sizes. For GAP, you can handle much larger groups using its character table library. The following gives all the sizes, orders, and power relations for the O'Nan group. To check that 8a and 8b are not power conjugate, use the last commands. gap> LoadPackage(""ctbllib"");; # Get the O'Nan group as a character table gap> ct = CharacterTable(""ON"");; gap> OrdersClassRepresentatives(ct); gap> SizesConjugacyClasses(ct); # See which classes are 13th powers of each other gap> List( Filtered( > Cycles(PermList(PowerMap(ct,13)), [1..NrConjugacyClasses(ct)]), > x->Length(x)>1), x->ClassNames(ct){x}); [ [ ""15a"", ""15b"" ], [ ""16a"", ""16b"" ], [ ""16c"", ""16d"" ], [ ""19a"", ""19c"", ""19b"" ], [ ""20a"", ""20b"" ], [ ""28a"", ""28b"" ], [ ""31a"", ""31b"" ] ] gap> PrintArray(TransposedMat([ClassNames(ct), > OrdersClassRepresentatives(ct), > SizesConjugacyClasses(ct), > List(SizesConjugacyClasses(ct),StringPP)])); [[ 1a, 1, 1, 1 ], [ 2a, 2, 2857239, 3^2*7^2*11*19*31 ], [ 3a, 3, 142227008, 2^6*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 4a, 4, 5714478, 2*3^2*7^2*11*19*31 ], [ 4b, 4, 1800060570, 2*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 5a, 5, 2560086144, 2^7*3^2*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 6a, 6, 6400215360, 2^6*3^2*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 7a, 7, 335871360, 2^7*3^4*5*11*19*31 ], [ 7b, 7, 9404398080, 2^9*3^4*5*7*11*19*31 ], [ 8a, 8, 14400484560, 2^4*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 8b, 8, 14400484560, 2^4*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 10a, 10, 23040775296, 2^7*3^4*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 11a, 11, 41892318720, 2^9*3^4*5*7^3*19*31 ], [ 12a, 12, 12800430720, 2^7*3^2*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 14a, 14, 16457696640, 2^7*3^4*5*7^2*11*19*31 ], [ 15a, 15, 10240344576, 2^9*3^2*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 15b, 15, 10240344576, 2^9*3^2*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 16a, 16, 28800969120, 2^5*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 16b, 16, 28800969120, 2^5*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 16c, 16, 28800969120, 2^5*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 16d, 16, 28800969120, 2^5*3^4*5*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 19a, 19, 24253447680, 2^9*3^4*5*7^3*11*31 ], [ 19b, 19, 24253447680, 2^9*3^4*5*7^3*11*31 ], [ 19c, 19, 24253447680, 2^9*3^4*5*7^3*11*31 ], [ 20a, 20, 23040775296, 2^7*3^4*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 20b, 20, 23040775296, 2^7*3^4*7^3*11*19*31 ], [ 28a, 28, 16457696640, 2^7*3^4*5*7^2*11*19*31 ], [ 28b, 28, 16457696640, 2^7*3^4*5*7^2*11*19*31 ], [ 31a, 31, 14865016320, 2^9*3^4* +Thank you for correcting that. When I put it in there to begin with, it was reflective of the government facilities in the area associtated with Fort Taylor. The NOAA facility is outside the historic boundaries of Fort Taylor and is an entirely new structure. +" Ref Example; Fred is English. Page 1, A Book, 2014 Fred likes cheese. Fred is English. Page 1, A Book, 2014 Fred likes cheese. 88.104.31.21 " +Yes, I remeber you warmly. Did the personal attack against you, in the case you mention, involve a body part of yours having been selected for scurrilous comment, as is the case above? Do you not realise that anything of that sort is a criminal matter in ordinary life (a person can go to jail in the United States for something that)? I do question motives behind actions of Wikipedia administrators where I do not see official policies and guidelines supporting them; and I expect User:Bishonen’s answers: those can be given, I may be proven wrong, and the matter might end with an apology. There should be more questioning, not less, however, if problems like those you yourself had suffered are to be rectified systemically. There is a world of difference between, on the one hand, a personal attack, such as might involve a reference to the victim’s body, and, on the other hand, an attack on ABUSE of authority or an attack on the wrongfulness of an action. One thing that User:Bishonen and User:Charles Matthews simply have NO right to do is continuously to cyber-stalk me with intent to harass with unexplained reverts, etc., and when questioned refuse to engage. Interlocutors might be chosen at liberty when he or she opens the door of his or her house: here such liberty does not exist, and questions from all quarters must be answered as a matter of official policy. Thank you for writing to me in what obviously are very difficult times. — Prof02 +GO FUCK YOURSELF. IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT. I have a proxy server with access to over 100 domains so I will continue editing wikipedia. +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or . Again, welcome!" +That the riot happens is in the same area area where there previously - and only a few years ago - has been other incidents of religious/political violence and unrest, is worth mentioning. One of the incidents of previous religious/political unrest was the attack on the synagogue, and there is no excuse not to mention it. +I don't want to split hairs, but my comments were made with respect to the content of your reply, not your person. I am sure that you are a wonderful human being, but the things you write on the internet possess a quality of their own. (I apologize in advance for certain individuals who are too sensitive to hear the truth) +WikiProject New York City Transportation article on Andrew Saul Just a heads up that Andrew Saul (vice-Chairman of the MTA) has been nominated for featured article status here. Any input, comment and suggestions would be greatly appreciated, there is not that much info on him as it relates to the MTA, and being an !expert, I'm not quite sure how well I can flesh it out. Please feel free to comment and/or improve the article. Thanks! +Yes - please note. …☎ +" Replied at your talk page. Can I suggest that you sign your comments (by putting ~~~~ after them) in future? " +There is source that says he signed on for his gross. Grazer cannily took advantage of Universal's need to send a message of strength and viability; brand-new co-chairmen Marc Shmuger and David Linde went ahead with the deluxe deal. If Snider had not left, she would likely have kept the budget down. The key players got paid full price, with rich back ends. Denzel Washington had already gotten paid his upfront guarantee pay-or-play, so he signed on just for his gross. (He also got paid half his $20-million fee on Inside Man.) This way even when American Gangster makes money, so do gross participants Washington, Scott, Grazer and Russell Crowe. That adds up to a huge piece of the final gross going out the doorin all likelihood, some 37.5 25% of the gross. ($37.5 was Universal's all-time high, on Grinch.) The studios are all trying to not go over that 25%, which is still a hideous percentage. http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/american_gangster/index.html +I have no clue what your on about, the UK system is completely different =|. +" Reverting for no reason Hi. I see you undid edits I made, with the summary ""http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=From_The_Doctor_to_my_son_Thomas&diff;=646666152&oldid;=646565498 keep approp formatting from WP:GA version]. As I'm sure you're aware, that is an entirely meaningless edit summary. It was not formatting that I changed, and the fact that an article has a little green cross does not mean that it cannot be improved. So, if you had an actual reason for the revert, please state what it is. If you didn't, then please don't do that again. You're damaging the encyclopaedia. 200.83.101.199 " +Ok, I will do it.200.216.63.82 +Vandalism? Don't use words which you do not understand. Also do not try to ape proper encyclopedists. It is risible, call-centre boy. +List of articles repeatedly disrupted by Mattisse and her sockpuppet for investigation tdb +" 457 55 5462 Whereas this, 457 55 5462, is amongst the most advertized numbers, possibly even more than the ""sixteen_words"", why is it not in the article? Why is there no idwatchdog article? < http://idwatchdog.com >. [[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. %7e%7e Thank You. -]] " +"There's one of these pseudo-proofs for ""1 = 0"", too; it basically goes like this: 0 = 0 + 0 + 0 + ... = (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + ...""; using associativity, ""(1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + ... = 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + ... = 1 + 0 + 0 + ... = 1"". What's invalid here is that the law of associativity does not hold for infinite sums that aren't absolutely convergent. 00:12 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)" +Best Movie EVER!!! Bar none. +"== June 2010 == Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. (talk) " +I object to this edit. this article is not your personal domain. december 27 is not sufficient time for all editors to be advised of such an edit +According to Article I, the Vice President of the US is President of the Senate. Even though Bush & Cheney were no longer discharging their powers/duties as Pres of the Senate for those few hours, they were still Pres of the Senate, regardless. +" The sentence ""The exact origin of the word Bangla or Bengal is unknown"" is misleading and erroneous .The word ""Bengal"" is derived from the root Sanskrit word ""Banga"" or Vanga . This being the case how can you say that the origin of the word "" bengal"" is unknown. I am not under any impression that Vyas named everything. But it is very much clear that the place name ""Vanga"" existed from the times of Vyasa. - " +Personal attacks I usually just let them go, but this is getting out of hand. Can you at least look into this matter again? Thanks. Sorry for the extra work. +" THIS IS MY REPLY TO YOU THAT YOU HAVE DELETED ACTING AS A FASCIST FROM THE DISCUSSION ON NICOSIA PAGE: Nicosia and discrimination against Greek contributors and the Greek character of the cityDear Salvio, You have accused me of abusive behaviour against other users and consequently blocked me from editing the article on Nicosia for a 24 hour period. May I draw to your attention that it is fairly obvious that those three users namely Seb az86556 , Seric2 and Chesdovi are clearly constantly creating a picture of Nicosia as a decadent muslim city that serves their religious beliefs and are all clearly hailing form Turkish backgrounds. There is a constant undermining of the city´s Greek identity i.e. whenever a Greek flag appears in any single picture the aforementioned users delete that picture instantaneously and prefer to throw in pictures of the flag of ""shame"" and occupation that is equivalent to a legalisation of a human crime of continuous brutal occupation of the island of Cyprus by the Turkish army. The Greek flag is OMNIPRESENT in the Republic of Cyprus whether some people like it or detest it but this is the reality and an Encyclopedia that wishes to be UNBIASED should depict the REALITY and not the subjective views of a minority of readers that are furthermore based on extremist religious and nationalistic views. On the other hand, such users do find it appropriate to throw in pictures using the Turkish and the ILLEGAL, yes illegal according to United Nation referendums flat of the non-recognised internationally illegal self-proclaimed state of the so-called TRNC. It is totally UNACCEPTABLE to have extremist nationalistic individuals, that strategically reached the level of administrators, deteriorating all the time the article on the city of Nicosia, promoting an unrealistic Turkish character and undermining the Greek character of the city AND at the same time having an ADDITIONAL article on ""North Nicosia"" that is depicting a totally FALSE picture w.r.t the city. The TRNC is illegal, not recognised by any state other than Turkey and some terrorist states that are non-democratic and yet Wikipedia has a page on Northern Nicosia by supposedly administrators that support the unification of Cyprus. This is clearly a major distortion of their intentions and a huge lie in that an individual that pretends to be a neutral aribtrator and a supoporter of reunification cannot have a separate page on Northern Nicosia stressing how Turkish it is and then go and literally destroy everything in the proper page for Nicosia and emphasize the Turkish character of the city, talk about the tension and the division of the city all the time and undermine the Greek character. This is clear nationalistic and racial discrimination against the indisputable Greek character of the area controlled by the Republic of Cyprus and furthermore it is downgrading for the Republic of Cyprus the mere fact that Wikipedia has a site that is CONSTANTLY vandalised by several ethnic Turkish extremists and Wikipedia users support such discriminatory behaviour. In the light of all of this, I shall stop contributing to Wikipedia as I consider it downgrading for my own self. Furthermore, I do not wish to participate in an ""encyclopedic"" project that is totally biased and discriminatory. Marcobadotti (talk) " +I've found many other forum links on here, but thanks anyway +" Here are your displays of impartiality and civility, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Copacabana&diff;=prev&oldid;=181213623 Rsazevedo you lied to me] Rsazevedo, you said that Wikipedia ""is not the place for nationalistic displays"" but you displayed an incredible degree of nationalism when you created a page redirect just to get your precious Copacabana Bolivia on top of the alphabetical list. Don't worry your Copacabana (Bolivia) is top of list at Wikipedia's expense. (Your Copacabana Bolivia comes on top is all 3 organizing methods created. It's shameful) I have nothing agaist you is just that you lied to me when you said that Wikipedia ""is not the place for nationalistic displays"". This is proves that you are bised and corrupted Wikipedia for personal ends. It's quite sad really, I always try to be impartial, you've given up on that. But I guess your ""work"" here is done. Your precious Copacabana Bolivia, which you visited, is first on the list. You've spread your personal views at Wikipedia corrupting this encyclopedia, and then lied to others about Wikipedia not being ""the place for nationalistic displays"". 3 organizing methods the same result - this is Rsazevedo at work Good job, some Brazilian you are. You have no shame, you should admit that you are biased. After 3 organizing methods with the same result your lame excuses are a joke. Once again I call on you, , to refrain at once from offending me. I don't think I have to remind you that you're breaking all possible rules in proper behaviour in Wikipedia, and I once again call for a responsible administrator to punish you accordingly. Keep in mind: Wikipedia:Civility: be civil and avoid harassment''. Personal attacks are expressly prohibited because they make Wikipedia a hostile environment for editors, and thereby damage Wikipedia both as an encyclopedia (by losing valued contributors) and as a wiki community (by discouraging reasoned discussion). Wikipedia editors should conduct their relationship with other editors with courtesy, and must avoid responding in kind when personally attacked.*Personal attacks are not excused or justified by offers of demonstration of their truth.Penalties for behaviour such as the one you're displaying vary in length from a three-month to a one-year''' ban. " +" I'd like to clarify my concerns with the current version of the article, following the reversion of some of my edits by Stirling Newberry. My general concern is that it doesn't accurately describe the debate about various causes of hyperinflation. The article seems to me to be describing a stereotyped view of each side of the debate, which exagerrates the amount of controversy and obscures the amount of common ground. ""Monetary"" and ""Crisis of confidence"" explanations of hyperinflation are describes as if they are two completely different competing theories, held by different schools of thought (""monetarists"" and ""neo-liberals""). I think that the overwhelming majority of economists would see both monetary and confidence factors as being important as the initial 'root cause' of hyperinflation, with the importance varying from case to case. A lot of the economics is very uncontroversial. For example: It's totally uncontroversial that a massive increase in the money supply will cause hyperinflation. Virtually any economist will agree that a big increase in the money supply is a possible trigger for hyperinflation, even if they don't believe it's the only one. To say imply that neo-liberal economists don't believe that some hyperinflations are initially triggered by monetary expansion is to caricature their position. It's totally uncontroversial that loss of confidence in the monetary system has a big role in hyperinflation. To imply that monetarists don't see a role for reestablishing confidence in the currency - that just 'stopping the printing presses' is enough - is just misleading. Monetarists talk about ways of establishing confidence all the time. I would be interested to hear from Stirling what specific inaccuracies were in my edits, and why he deleted the statement ""The two models are closely related, and often economists may explain hyperinflation as being due to a combination of both effects."" 20:44, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)" +Barnstar Thanks! Might I ask why? '''''' (Take me down to the Paradise City) +Sounds very reasonable to me. Thanks. +just wow. if you don't want to restore it , i will. i am extremely confident we would get admin concurrence with your judgement. as far as i'm concerned , you are part of the problem, go pound sand. +Hey nigger Go fuck yourself and stop revering my reverts. +soundcloud.com is a source, along with youtube.com; that are used as references by so many of your articles. i don't see why my work alone cannot be verified by those sources. and thanks for the rulebook in my face again... i'd read those pages if they were of any relevance to me... +" See also, Byzantium and the Arabs in the ourth Century by Irfan Shahid which states: ""If the beginnings of pre-Islamic Arabic poetry cannot be determined with accuracy, it can be safely assumed that the composition of Arabic poetry goes back to at least the fourth century AD."" talk " +While you're at it, take a peek at Mutilation. +Omura Arbitration evidence Be sure to use third (===) level headings for your evidence, or else the evidence page will become quite confusing. Thanks, T +Why not eat me?66.77.102.10 +" Usage .""the term is sometimes used within Israel; predominantly by ""fanatical Jewish chauvinists"" for political motives, to describe Illegal Jewish Israeli settlements within the Occupied Palestinian Territories."" Shown by the term not being applied to Tel Aviv District.(Israel insider Ma'ale Adumim larger than Tel Aviv, I don't think so) Gush Emunim apply the term to the West Bank as a geopolitical manoeuvre devoted to an ideology ""greater land of Israel"".(Ha'aretz) The terms ""Judea and Samaria"" are also highly controversial in Israeli society itself, and are often employed specifically as a collective reference to the illegal Israeli settlements in that area, historically and presently, especially by Jewish settlers and their supporters.(Jpost Arutz Sheva) ""Newsweek Nov 20 1995"" [...] it stretches to the fanatical Jewish chauvinists who want to expel the Arabs from the land they call Judea and Samariaa territory that, depending on how you read the Bible, could stretch past the Jordan as far as the Euphrates. Says Sternhell: ""The minimum the religious Zionists can live with is the West Bank."" ""Newsweek Nov 13 1995"" The religious settlers in the occupied territories believe that God gave them the West Bankwhich they call by the Biblical names Judea and Samaria-and that no temporal leader can give the Promised Land away. Left-wing Israelis prefer ""HaGada HaMa'aravit"" (הגדה המערבית ""The West Bank"" in Hebrew) or ""Hashetahim Hakvushim"" (השטחים הכבושים, The Occupied Territories). Many Arab Palestinians object to this term as a rejection of their claim to the land. Nevertheless, the term al-Yahudiyya was-Samarah is used by Arab Christians in reference to the Bible.(Murqus, Sa'īd. Tafsīr kalimāt al-Kitāb al-Muqaddas, Cairo, 1996, in Arabic)Jewish daily As used by JVL in ""The College of Judea & Samaria"" where the college is described As a demonstratively Zionist institution, the College has two key requirements: every student must study one course per semester on some aspect of Judaism, Jewish heritage or Land of Israel studies, and the Israeli flag must be displayed in every classroom, laboratory and auditorium on campus.JVL APCR again used by right wing extremists for West Bank. Now lets' look at what the official name of the geopolitical area is: US officially designates the West Bank the occupied territories.... Library of Congress Dore gold wants Disputed territories... B'Tselem occupied territories Britain's position...Occupied territories. Ireland Occupied territories... UN occupied territories.. Red Cross; The ICRC in Israel, the Occupied Territories and the Autonomous Territories indexed under Palestine, interesting. and yet wiki uses a term that is controversial in Israel. RS sources; Gershom Gorenberg OT David Kretzmer OT Kitty Warnock OT Felicia Langer OT Idith Zertal, Akiva Eldar, Vivian Eden, Vivian Sohn Eden OT Stephen C Pelletiere OT Eyal Benvenisti OT Joost R. Hiltermann OT Emma Playfair OT Erica Lang OT Esther Rosalind Cohen OT Linda Bevis OT John J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt OT Paul Hunt OT Ghāzī Khurshīd, Ibrahim Abid OT Lynne Rosengrant Franks OT Neil Alger DT William B. Quandt DT Colin Shindler; Judea and Samaria; Used in conjunction with the right wing ultra nationalist religious movement. Joseph Telushkin JS Judea, Samaria, and Gaza: Views on the Present and Future By Daniel Judah Elazar Published by American Enterprise +2009 (UTC) So which aircraft was it guys? In the text of this article, somone tried to change the references to an SBD Dauntless that shot Sakai, too a TBF Avenger without changing all of the text calling the aircraft an SBD! So what is the truth of the matter? Most of the references online that I have seen refer to an SBD Dauntless rear gunner having done the deed but it is possible it was a TBF Avenger. So what's the final verdict because the article's text on the incident is confusing. 04:03, 6 September +We're on our way! ;[............ +Life insurance ?+++ Don't fuck with them or you wont live long ++++ +" Yes yes, ""personnal attacks"", reacting to homophobic attacks. I am fairly proud about my behavior, despite I am blocked. Lestrade is a genuine silly homophobe, it's a fact " +Besides, you were insulting an administrator of Romanian Wikipedia, how about that? Are you so blinded by hatred that you see enemies there were there aren't any?!? And, oh, by the way, edits like this one: http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discu%C5%A3ie:Uniunea_Democrat%C4%83_Maghiar%C4%83_din_Rom%C3%A2nia&diff;=prev&oldid;=148287 can & will get you in trouble on Romanian Wikipedia, too! Please mind your attitude, your words, observe the Wikipedia:Wikiquette and oh, last but not least, you should at least have the decency to apologise to me. +" to PNT. I look forward to seeing you around WP. ) Transactional and transformational leadership Dear Synchronism, I would be happier if next time you research a little bit more on the notability of the articles you're proposing to delete before tagging them. Both theories are widely known among the leadership scholars, and a google or google scholar search would sufice. Also, it helps if you check the history page. There was some indication that some sort of bibliography existed before in transformational leadership, as the ""years"" were cited after the authors. In a couple of clicks, you could have discovered the bibliography that was deleted by some editor in the past. Happy edits, A google hit count is not the same as a corpus token count. Anyway, ghits and corpus tokens don't equate notability. I clearly have different opinions on this subject than you, so I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't conflate those differences with any complaints you have about my editting activity. You responded to my proposed deletions sufficiently and then some. And for the record: I do look at page histories. User page Thanks for the revert. Have a gorilla No problem, Budgie (TV series) Are you a lawyer by any chance? Having tidied up some appallingly written text in the article Budgie (TV series) it seems you have reverted it back on some minor technicality. If you aren't a lawyer I suggest you contact the Department of Justice as they are looking for people just like you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.68.13 You removed referenced text from the article without explanation. I'll happily restore your reversions partially, but do not remove substantial text without explanation. Parapsychology is a pseudoscience and you guys are promoting it as science. Cluebot reverted my edits removing unreliable sourcing on that article. Now, when I try to point out it is a pseudoscience, you revert my edits again. All you are are a bunch of frauds who want to promote ignorance and superstition. Why else would you revert edits which call a pseudoscience for what it is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) < ! Template:Unsigned > Having not ever read the article I wouldn't know if it's promoting anything. I reverted your edits because you removed the bulk of the articles text and replaced it with a comment that would have been more useful on the article's talk page. As far as the 'bots action's are concerned, I support it. The references obviously don't by themselves make anything true, but it least we know where it's coming from. You could always just undo the bot's edits... " +" So, you ""don't want to express your personal opinion,"" yet in the same breath you express your personal opinion? What are you playing at? Are you deliberately trying to appear biased?" +Woo! HI Lucky 6 point 9 what is going on its me again!! I'm feeling just stupendous right now! I saw your comments and left you all a note of the Request for Comment page. I'm really really sorry about being sooo naughty and hope we can turn a new page in our lives and start over from the beginning. I'm feeling great and quite lively tonight!! Have a good ONE !!! ) +The source I used quoted it wrongly. I searched the net and found another source which quoted another ISBN (with a different last digit) having consistant digits. I have made the corrections. Thanks for pointing it out. — (talk) +It's very messy and time consuming to cleanup +Eddits Who the fuck are you to be reversing my eddits and such? Mind your own fucking business, jerk. +I want to share something with you Here is a poem that details something I think you'll find educational. After checking over your behavior on Wikipedia a little bit, I think you might be interested in what it's like to have a penis. Your incessant edit warring (that you childishly deny), and your infuriating, relentless self-importance are all the evidence that I need to conclude that you either a) don't have a penis (much like Gwen Gale) or b) possess such a small penis that it just doesn't count. Anyway, enjoy this poem - just for you. I'll tell you a short poem; I'll try to make it quick. The subject is quite simple: The joy of having a dick. Penises are super things; Daedalus969 should be jealous. An organ surrounded by sensitive skin. That's smooth and rarely hairless It starts to grow dramatically, When you're about thirteen. Your testicles on either side; Your willy in between. It dangles neatly down below; Soft, obedient and loyal. At the slightest hint of lust, It's ready to uncoil. It often has a mind all of its own; It's like a wild untamed beast. It squirms and writhes and stretches out; When you expect it least. Sometimes, yes, it misbehaves; Erecting when it shouldn't. A bumpy train ride sets it off; Just when you wish it wouldn't. And during the summer, wearing little, sunning on the beach. The slightest sight of shaking boobs Makes it squirm just like a leech. Handle it with love and care; For it can give great pleasure. Has it grown since last weekend? And when did you last measure? Some people fret about its size; They give it lots of thought. Is thirteen inches long enough? It makes guys quite distraught. They peek across in urinals, To compare and try to see But if another glances back at them. There's no way they can pee. Masturbating is a sin; That's what some folk believe. But those are just old wives' tales; Cuz it really can relieve. Without this fabulous organ, No shag would be complete. Lesbians will try their best; But must admit defeat. It has to main bodily functions I'm sure you'll all agree. To start a whole new life and of course daily to pee But I think the thing that's marvellous; About that one eyed brute. Is that when its trying to procreate, It knows which fluid to shoot And always it remains with you; Until you're old and frail. Don't take it out in public though, or you'll be thrown in jail. And so to summarise I'd say with certainty, that every male loves his little friend But girls, no matter what we do, Please don't fold, spindle mutilate and NEVER NEVER Bend!!! +French Wikipedia has an elegant solution to the ROC naming problem. Republic of China is a disambiguation page with the options of Republic of China (1912-1949), Republic of China (Taiwan), Republic of China (Nanking) and People's Republic of China. Following that logic, this page should be renamed to Republic of China (Taiwan). +" Might not have been able to win. Beating the hacks in Oz was easy peasy, but taking on the wonderful super horses in his Aotearoa homeland would have been a different kettle of fish. Did you know that our article is wrong where in gives the meaning of the name Phar Lap? It's actually a Maori phrase which means ""Ima Kiwi"". Dinkum. " +Re: Mass removal of language articles by Ryulong Thank you for joining the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages#Mass deletion of language articles by Ryulong. Without enough eyeballs, something unthinkable does happen in this encyclopedia. Please keep an eye on this problem. +Spirit of the Plains Not sure how this fits in the discography, but Spirit of the Plains is the title of a composition for flute by Whitwell and it appears on an eponymous 2013 CD collection of flute music. — +[User:Bbb23]] you can take your pompous poaturings and berger off. +rights im not attacking anyone, im following the 1st admendment to freddom of speech. you cannot deny me that right. if i want to upload something on someone else then i will. +souldn't we adress hte fact that there are TWO TSO's for touring purposes, one headed by pitrelli and the other by Skolnick +right i cant email you for some weird reason i cant work out so i hope you can see this. if this is about first commet on global wrming page, could you please explain which editor i attacked and for bieng of which nationality. and ill just clarify that my comment was not condoning anyones personal attack, i couldnt actually see any, it was to make the point that nazi is not a horrible diry word and it can be used to describe people who are restraing others personal freedom however slightly. +Peloponesian War - good, but maybe move to another page? I don't have a strong view, and I'm not sure which way is wikkiest, but I think the diversion into the history of a campaign lost through the disease might do at least as well on its own - as a side bar, diversion or further layer of detail. Opinions? +" At one point this ""hijacked"" article has to be improved or just restored to the original version to meet neutrality requirements. " +" I think you need to look at our standards for ""temporary"" notability (it isn't) a bit more closely. You made the newbie error of blanking references because their host website had since 404'ed, which you then compounded by blanking the para they supported. We don't do this, we tag refs with and then (or simultaneously) we see if they're recoverable. Both of these were trivially so. It took me less time to do this useful minor task than it did to revert your edit warring and pointless argument here. If the situation has changed, then by all means update the statement about the current state of the bridge. That might use these refs, it might not. However blanking sections because of a 404 is never the way to progress forwards. I do not have any special connection with either the bridge, Runcorn or the YMCA. Nor am I required to have them before editing this article. " +Re: Creating a username Thanks for your message, but I will remain to be identified by my IP address because in the past, there has been some issues with my username and some other admin. people on here were treating me unfairly and accusing me of being a sockpuppet, which resulted in getting blocked. Cheers, 122.106.27.175 +Yeah umm you changed back my edit. I though it was a good edit, maybe it wasn't, or maybe you are just flamboyantly homosexual. +, to let me get away with my fantasy revisionism to edit faggotry as normalcy +" Merry Christmas! 70px|left is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message." +== Lets see == Multiple names Multiple voices Multiple IP's Multiple names Pretend existence Claims of expertise of existences not lived. You are Mr L. You live in North Yorks and have done for some years. You fall out with everyone and became a figure of fun for my law students when thus I was employed. Semi retired now and an artist of note in these parts. Once in a while when on line I see what vast twittery reigns - you are very funny Bill - the cod accent was the funniest. Keep going boy. Regards from Zutphen. You could get out a little more. +" As they say in the movies, ""ooh behave"". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article mightn't find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. Now go and play a little in Wikipedia sandbox. and Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. Please note these points: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that. Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. from Wikipedian: " +Consider the following People who edit wikipedia are fucking retarded. 174.134.156.86 +I didn't say it he did. Reference it? I'm new to this so I don't know. +Anyway I've to finish my complains! +, 1 December 2007 (UTC) Good work! 15:37 +" The innate immunity, i.e. phagocytosis, is not particularly good at dealing with viruses. In fact, it has been argued, in Delves and Sompayrac for starters, that the adaptive immune system evolved to defend us against these little bastards. Your are right about phagocytes mopping up after wards, but it is the lymphocytes that control virus infections. So, not really part of this article as such. But your are right. Some readers will wonder about viruses, so the article needs to mention them more, if only to say that phagocytes can't handle them alone. This will not be difficult to add and I will write it today. With regard to green snot during a viral infection—secondary bacterial infections, opportunistically infecting the damaged tissues, are no doubt to blame. Talk " +" Well, I read through it again, and it doesn't seem like you can't do it, but I guess it's something to consider. T/C " +Not part of the criteria. — +I didn't think you were rude at all. Absolutely not. I said sorry, because I made that edit believing that because Menchov's second place was stripped, others were elevated to 2nd and 3rd place. I did not know that it was left blank; therefore I said that I am sorry, and you we're right. And, that's when I decided to add the source that you gave in the edit summary (for which I thank you) beside it, so that others don't make the same edit that I did. What you wrote didn't appear rude at all. +Chand kings Hello, The civil words were not working and you were not interested to speak. The further discussion will not be so civil. Hope you understand Royal Pahad +"""Race"" and IQ www.apa.org" +I picked up on the questionable additions while doing WP:RCP with Huggle, and didn't check the talk page before went at 'em, but neither of them seemed appropriate here so I reverted them. +Nig, Nigs? Nig, Nigs? What about Nig, Nigs? I hear sometimes people call others those. Nig, Nigs? +I've had just about enough of you! Since you have been following me around to different articles I decided to check your contributions and find you secretly posting about me on this talk page. Apparently the ANI you've been posting to wasn't enough? After you obsessively reverted all my sourced edits to the few pages from yesterday, I decided to disengage and move on to other pages. But you've followed me to new pages and continue to revert everything I do without discussion! I understand that there is a subtle bias against IP editors, so this probably won't happen, but you really should be topic banned for this sort of ownership and harassing behavior. 2601:7:1980:5B5:35E6:8C6C:3D1E:A148 +SUBSIDIZED HOUSING IS A FREE MARKET DISTORTION, AND UNLESS YOU RECEIVE THE SUBSIDY, YOU ARE AT A DISADVANTAGE, PERIOD. +At least they were...odd +Your a snitch betty leave us alone go mind your own business and stop reporting everyone we don't need people like you telling us what we can or cannot do. I will report you. +Hello. An administrator protected the IRA page, ignored evidence that the page was wrong, declined my edit request on incorrect grounds, refuses to fix the page despite it being wrong and so on. And he's English, need I say more? +" War vs Rosales I added this moral war vs. Rosales. Since, Ang Ladlad is a political party, but it now douses itself on the moral aspect. And this sensational hysteria made waves: Ang Ladlad criticized Cardinal Gaudencio Rosales's statement per Radio Veritas on May 5, 2008, that ""Gays should not be allowed to participate in Flores de Mayo since it defeats the true meaning of the celebration."" Danton Remoto attacked the cardinal's statement, saying that: ""In the eyes of God, everyone is equal; Some of these gay men have saved a lot of money for their gowns (to be worn in the procession) and they were doing it because they believed in the Virgin Mary. They need understanding, not condemnation."" www.reuters.com, Manila bishop says against gay men in May parade Rosales however, countered that: “I am not angry at gay men. But, I am against what they’re actually doing.” queerty.com, No Homos At Mary Celebration, Says Cardinalmanilatimes.net, Cardinal: Gays out of ‘Santacruzans’ " +As I said, look at the dock even in the thumb. How you believe the owner got to his boat? Was he flying or was he swimming? It is attached to nowhere. Anyway. +The credibility of these sources is not in any way, under any policy on Wikipedia, verified, and the tag belongs. +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ·(t) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • [[Wikipedia:Eti +Do you issue instant warnings On what basis are those warnings issued. Did you check the talk page of Jauerback or you just believed his version in my talk page and issued the warning. Is that not necessary to check, and understand whether any word used is a personal attack or not before issuing any warning. I seek an apology from you and want the warning in my talk page reverted. This kind of instant warning by an Admin without any reason is unacceptable. +" I probably should have called you ""Stan,"" not ""Slim."" " +" This is ironic... is a new user... and you were the one who left the ""Welcome"" message on his/her talk page. This is just a guess, but I think Qwetzalquoatal saw that you reverted me by looking at your edits and then got to my contributions that way. S/he is adding a template to the top of all the MLB player article I've created, including the 11 I've created today, which I assume he got to by looking at my contributions. This is ironic because earlier I was blocked for looking at your contributions, and a new user whom you greeted I think used your contributions to get to my contributions, and is editing all the article I created. Now, the template he's adding is , so s/he is being very helpful, and this isn't in any way at all a problem. I just wanted to let you know about this little irony I've spotted ) ''''''(talk) " +I already noticed the network, thanks anyway:) Where do you work here on the historical research? +Speedy deletion of Shoot Out A tag has been placed on Shoot Out, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: article about a game that does not yet exist. Delete as per WP:Crystal Ball. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" (Also please note that your definition of ""unreliable"" doesn't appear to match the one used by Wikipedia. Under the latter it is entirely possible for an expression of opinion by someone with a clear bias or agenda to be reliably sourced.)" +" Paris RER Ehm, some comments about your Gare Aéroport Charles de Gaulle 1 RER edits: it's not a good idea to create a new article when there is already an article about the same subject. The naming convention for RER stations is ""X (Paris RER)"", except when the station is also used by regular trains (Transilien, TER or other), then we use ""Gare de X"". I just saw that you moved nearly all of the RER stations. Better discuss it before you introduce a new standard name. If you're sure that no trains from Charles de Gaulle take the branch line to Robinson, you can change the ""type2"" field into ""B4"" instead of ""both"". But I checked it on the RATP website, and they do. I don't think it's very useful to show all the different options for the RER lines, some trains skip a few stations, or serve only part of the line. I think for the B line alone there are more than 20 variants. Talk " +"Don't worry Bill, Wikzilla just goes and reverts your vandalism. Signed Dufus ""He's everywhere!"" the Dog, beloved pet of Wikzilla" +" I read the cite listed in the lead paragraph. Nothing resembling ""even if the Fédération Cynologique Internationale does not acknowledge that widely belived association."" was anywhere to be found. Stop adding bias. It's an article about a freakin' breed of dog. You've already been warned to stop the POV crap. If you've got something that resembles a reliable source, then add it. Otherwise, stop wasting people's time. " +Wrong—this is an edit dispute, not vandalism. See Wikipedia:VAND#What is not vandalism. Luke +" Ririn vs. Lirin I noted that Ririn name is now given as Lirin, because is how ""adultswim"" gives it (do to my browser I haven't been able to comfirm this). My question is why are we using this as her name when in ""Bleach Beat Collection 2nd Session:04"" her name is clearly spelled as Ririn?205.110.157.251 " +" A barnstar for you! The TAFI Barnstar Thanks for your contributions to WikiProject Today's article for improvement, which have served to expand the project and increase participation and collaboration there. (talk) " +, as you've done before +Yes, and some used in the article, but the whole section on litigation is someone's personal gathering of the court cases. It's not based on their significance as reported by reliable sources. +" My bad. Sr13 is almost larity " +You are the one attacking and libelling me. I don't follow you around or make a nuisance on your talk page. Learn respect. Slander and libel. Go on and build your evidence, but it's all water under the bridge or over the dam. Cry about spilt milk, but whatever happened is no longer happening and it seems you just want me banned because of your own inconsistent application of the rules. You think that because I prefer going by my IP address, I am some horrible person. I actually leave myself wide open to hackers, so you have little thing to be so upset about. It's my risk here, not yours. Quit complaining. +|decline=So no reason to unblock this one. +As if by magic... t c e +Yep, spot on now. you're welcome. ~~ +It addresses all reasons stated in the block. Why not allow someone uninvolved look it over? +Rango Can you please put back Angelique Carrington on the Rango (2011 film) and the Claudia Black pages? 210.50.232.183 +GGS House System Can you explain why Scotch College has an article on this? This information would make the GGS article rather long, don't you think? The houses are named after influential people in history. I'm new (but I've edited frequently on my IP), but I can see that there is rather a lot of ambiguity in this. +" So far, this is hearsay. I'd like to see a quote where Watson calls himself a ""classical liberal."" " +September 2010 Please stop personally attacking such as Port Adelaide Football Club. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. +I'll say this again: I am not a sockpuppet. 193.109.199.35 +"== October 2008 == ~ (with the !) " +I have surrendered - at least let me say goodbye Your reversion is inappropriate. Let it stay there. She owns the article, with your assistance. Let's leave it at that. Congratulations, by the way, on winning the war of truth, by keeping the article in a false condition so that it can never be returned to a true state. 123.2.223.96 +Did you have a Father? I am new to Wikipedia. I was only trying to see if I was dealing with a bot. Bot's do not have Fathers. I am not here to endear anyone. I am here to present facts. Whoever you are, you come across to new users (me) as anal retentive. Save your warnings, until they are deserved.... First, teach and entreat!! +I have requested a third opinion on this matter. +Review Summary Problems still exist with the article that at this time that do not permit its inclusion as a GA. The lead needs to be at least three paragraphs, which can be done with the information that is present at the moment. Problems still remain within the prose throughout. Billboard only needs to be mentioned once in the Chart performance section. Subsections were not created as requested. Fair use rationale for the cover art needs to provide the name of the record label and name of the photographer, if known. References are not properly formatted and over-linking still persists. (meow) +" Knights Templar and Christianity The article claims that ""the Knights Templar require members to be of the Christian faith"". This is simply not true. I am a Master Mason, Royal Arch Mason, Cryptic Mason, Knight Templar, 32nd Degree Scottish Rite Mason, and Shriner. I am also Buddhist, and this fact is well-known among others in these organizations. There are a series of questions that are asked of each Knight Templar candidate, some of which ask about the candidate's faith, however one does not need to be a Christian to be accepted into the Knights Templar." +":That's quite an intriguing observation - would this ""educator"" happen to be Andrew Schlafly, along with whom you stamp heavily upon all traces of the ""opposing viewpoints"", never mind acknowledging their ""mere existence""? Isn't it your - and this ""educator's"" - modus operandi to delete any and all opposing viewpoints, block those people who express, no matter how civilly or carefully expressed, opposing viewpoints, and publicly ridicule and verbally abuse such proponent's of opposing viewpoints? Hypocrisy seemingly knows no bounds. Glad to hear your RfA was laughed out of the building, by the way. Couldn't have happened to a ... *cough* nicer chap. " +List of names What is the relevant Style page for lists of people with a specific name, when such a list is too long to be included in a dab page? +y is i blocked. where you is???? +Dear Dr Suresh My name is Alex Hankey, and I am currently working in Bangalore to develop a new institute in AYUSH at the Manipal Group, together with Professor Bhushan Patwardhan. I was very interested to read your Wikipedia article on Siddha. As a member of the editorial boards of 2 scientific journals, I would like to offer to edit the English for you, retaining the meaning and content. It would help the readability, and clarify certain things. Please contact me on alexhankey@gmail.com if you would like me to do this. Alex Hankey P.S. I am a physicist by training, working on the biophysics of traditional medicine. I did my first degree at Cambridge, and my PhD at M.I.T. in Massacussetts, U.S.A. I have been working with traditional medicine since 1985, and have published major new theories of Tridosha, and Prana, the vital force(see the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, October 2001, February 2004, and several issues in 2005). I shall soon publish a theory of samaadi, and the soul body connection, based on my theory of vital force. +Bishonen: You are an extremely odious cunt. Why don't you go to the Indo-European languages page and see who made the disruptive edits in the first place? If you had an ounce of dignity and self-respect, you would have reverted that page to how it was before the disruptive edits were made. Instead, you blocked me while allowing other users to troll the page and make changes without establishing a consensus. I am fully convinced that you still hold a grudge against me for last year, considering the fact you took it upon yourself to block me without properly investigating what happened. What a cunt. +" Victim??? Have all the facts come out yet? Who determined that Martin is a ""victim"" as described in the intro box, and as stated in the article and many times on this talk page. Unless there has been a trial already that I was unaware of, we have no idea who the ""victim"" was or is. I request all references to ""victim"" be removed in the article.70.119.53.11 " +I couldn't give two shits faggot, fuck off. +" I'm afraid that despite the best effort of my schoolteachers over a three year period I have zero ability with the German language, perhaps if you have the appropriate references you could add some of what you mentioned above to the article? (talk) " +. Terrorism may be evil, but who defines what is a terrorist? Nelson Mandella was described as a terrorist by the South African Apartheid Government. George Washington and the American revolutionaries were terrorists from the point of view of the British government of George III. One man's terrorist is another's freedom-fighter. And you fail to consider the whole issue of state terrorism +yadavs are kshatriyas wht the hell happend to previous stuff written in the wiki which well defined yadavs,know some anti yadavs have edited the stuff and added whole new crap,mentoning yadavs as shudras is funny shit....some fuckin moron must hv done this.. +I forgot my social security number... How do I find out what mine is without usinng credit cards? +do explain How to upload an image. The entire procedure is clumsy and is it possible for me to snap photos of all celebrities and have my own copy right. brief me the possible way to upload an image, how to find it is copyright unprotected...§§ +Your Sony edit Hi. I've reverted that edit. Standard financial reporting is millions, not billions. You changed the million but left a comma, so 63,980 million became 63,980 brillion, i.e. 63 THOUSAND BILLION, which is of course nonsense. +":Also, I don't want to slow you down on FA, but it sounds like you're thinking about heading there after a final copyedit and some additional references. I would suggest waiting for a bit, as the article still seems pretty choppy to me. I took a stab at the navigation section tonight, rearranging sentences for paragraph flow, but didn't get very far without doing additional research. The article is comprehensive and duly referenced but I think it's still missing the elegant narrative that characterizes a feature article (""prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of professional standard""). Because it's been written by so many editors over many years, it feels a bit pieced together, and I think we have some work to do in creating an engaging narrative about the river. Missing citations, etc., are something we can deal with during the FA review, but I think it may help to work on the general flow of the article before going up for FA. I'll help out as I can... " +I am certainly willing to give it a try; we'll see if it works. I have read the talk page archive, the history of the article, and some of the linked articles to understand the dispute. I want to make it clear that I do not intend to be a mediator or an arbitrator. What I hope to do is simply be an editor whose motives people trust, so that if I make an edit you don't like, we can discuss the pros and cons without questioning intent. 06:48, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC) +Fully My edit to the Stephen Lawrence article is fully sourced to the old version of the Met web-site. Silly liar. +Iam Ok with RIAA certification numbers.-CAYA +" See Template:Wetlet Township for instance. What I want is you to use your tool to copy the list from the url link given and insert the list into the template but formatted horizontally as you'd expect in a nav plate. If I set up all of the township templates in this way can you copy directly from the url ink which will be provided for each one? I think that would be the best way to do it. Don't worry about creating lists that need dabbing as when I come to dab after they are all started I will see ""what link here"". Basically I am creating the townships of Burma templates which are actually the third-level divisions but you needn't worry about that as the lists will be accessed via the urls in the relative templates I make OK?♦ Dr. Blofeld " +Clowns In order to preserve the history of SBC, I'd like to see on this entry the pictures of clowns that SBC used to be so closely associated with +Dang, I thought it would be worldwide. Prove me wrong! Maybe, if they do, could make a sequence in 2008 after GTA4 with worldwide. You never know. +a good thing. Again, I have done nothing to deserve these accusations, I have made no changes and clearly I have apologized +" Barnstar The Tireless Contributor Barnstar I haven't left a barnstar on Wikipedia for a very long time. Sometimes when you are closely working with somebody you neglect to reward them for things that are really, really great. During my time on Wikipedia, I have seen you grow from a contributor who makes edits every now and then - almost solely contributing to Aquinas College, Perth to a wide PSA school scope. Recently I have stopped my contributions to PSA articles, for reasons both you and I know. I have realised my thank yous over the year you and I have been working together for have culminated in something a little larger. By comparison, you have probably been the editor I have worked with the most. I look forward to working with you in the future. Until then, here's a barnstar in recognition of your efforts in Australian schools articles. Soon enough, I hope to be joining your PSA watch you emailed me about. Thanks again, Auroranorth " +NATO names in bold. Hi, regarding your valid correction to my edit on Tupolev Tu-160 regarding NATO names and WP:AIR consensus. Please forgive my confusion, since Tupolev Tu-142, Tupolev Tu-16, Tupolev Tu-22, Tupolev Tu-85, Tupolev Tu-95 and Tupolev Tu-98 all use bold NATO names, which seems to indicate a different de facto standard in operation. +" Fail to see how it'd be ""more difficult"" for editors to add to/modify the information. It's not like it's coded in html or ancient Chinese in the chart. " +It as if you are shitting on an open grave of Maximillian because you couldn't bear the fact that he tried to help your pathetic ass. +Gutting Occupy Marines Your latest edits to Occupy Marines are clearly an attempt to eviscerate the article without discussing these issues beforehand with other editors. I shall leave the choice up to you as to how we proceed. Either you undo ALL of your most recent peremptory edits and pursue these matters in constructive Discussion with other editors, or I'll report you for edit warring. +" Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. (talk) " +i hate Andrewmc123 hes a asshole +" What!? I can't believe this was linked to the front page in it's present grammatical condition. The article says ""at all costs"" several times in the first two paragraphs alone. And as for this construction: ""The Hunger Plan may have being planned almost as soon.."" English, mutha focker, do you speak it???" +This article sucks. This is precisely what Wikipedia should NOT be. This is the kind of thing that will appear in sensationalistic news reports and blonde, blow-dried commentators will ask school board officials to comment on. What crap. +A few hours north of Boris it's a nasty 3 degrees and snowing hard. It's dropping a nice layer of slush instead of nice snow. When it goes back into the freeze (which it is expected to do for the coming week), our streets will be ice rinks. I'm just hoping for a few inches of nice snow for skiing on top of this: I'm going to get myself new skate-skis as an after-Christmas present ). +The BNP has no history with anti-semitism, it has BNP members of Jewish roots and secondly has elected Jewish councillors. As ususal you from far-left have it all wrong and just continue to lie or smear. +You're too late I undid it myself. I was simply trying to ascertain why there appeared to be two pages on the same book. +I agree, but please if you really think I am a puppet file a request at WP:RFCU and clear me! I'm not a puppet, just a newbie with an unfortunate similarity in username +quite all right your cause is noble +" ""if a regime is hated and fear by it's Baixing, and only use para-military to squash any kind of protest, what will happen if Baixing begin to act like 陳胜吳廣? "" I can assure CPC is not nearly as hated as you think. Minyuen is hated much more, for selling out China. " +WDWB-TV to WXON-TV? It can happen. look at KUAM-TV and KUAM-LP...same call-signs, different suffixes.... of course, they may have to ask WXON-LP in Flint, Michigan for permission. +The only thing I can considor I an attack was his edits. Which is acceptable as critism. +First Primitive Southern American Church for Gods Orphans and Other Loved Ones A tag has been placed on First Primitive Southern American Church for Gods Orphans and Other Loved Ones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +I am Peter The Roman, pretty sure Warning Mr. or Mrs. Favonian, With your last actions You Sinned Seriously, Pretty Sure. If you can and you do not unprotect the Prophecy of the Popes article, You Are Seriously Sinning, More Seriously As Time Passes, Pretty Sure. Somebody Who Gave The Order Is More Seriously Sinning that The Executor, Pretty Sure. The Inductor Is More Seriously Sinning that Who Gave The Order, Pretty Sure. The Ultimately Responsible Is More Seriously Sinning that The Inductor, Pretty Sure. The Torture of God Perhaps God will finally apply a Dream of Torture to all Persons in The World, beyond a certain threshold, with a Power and Duration proportional to The Sins. Perhaps, The Apocalypse will occur. Prayer, Pretty Sure God Please Forgive Me For My Lies. God Please Forgive Me For My Selfishness. God Please Forgive Me For My Vanity. God Please Forgive Me For My Laziness. God Please Forgive Me For My Lust. God Please Forgive Me For My Gluttony. God Please Forgive Me For My Greed. God Please Forgive Me For My Envy. God Please Forgive Me For My Pride. God Please Forgive Me For My Wrath. God Please Forgive Me For My Hate. God Please Forgive Me For Yielding To The Devil. God Please Forgive Me For Humiliating Devil. God Please Forgive Me For Venerating Devil. God Please Forgive Me For Asking Forgiveness From Devil. God Please Forgive Me For Forgiving Devil. God I Do Not Want To Be Submitted To Devil. God Please Protect Me From Temptations Of Devil. God Please Protect Me From Actions Of Devil. God Please Forgive Me For All My Sins. God Please Forgive All The Mortal Sins Of The Universe, If You Desire. I Am Not God. I Ask God Justice and Love. Peter The Roman, pretty sure. +Category:Old soldiers' home Another user created Category:Old soldiers' home to categorize Sawtelle Veterans Home, a fine new article on a historic U.S. facility. I put it as a subcategory to Category: United States Department of Veterans Affairs, but there may be a better category. It's also in category:1888 establishments and I almost sharpened that to Category:Military units and formations established in 1888, but that didn't quite seem to fit. Any suggestions on this category and article? Pardon if this isn't of interest - but you created one of those categories and you seem to work in the field. (Thanks for that, BTW). ·:· ·:· +Okay, so we have a picture of a drain being explored. To make things easier I can remove the graffiti from the photo and change the caption to a drain being explored in Sydney or something similar +Again; please review WP:NPA, and in future confine your contributions on here to how to improve the article. If you have direct information that justifies removal of the tags on the article page, then please outline them here before trying to remove them again +Hey, No body is commenting on the ABO blood group study which is a scientific study. Also this Rajput 999 user is using derogatory remarks and violating the Wiki policy. So did you ban him? How neutral are you as an administrator or Sitush is when none of you guys are commenting on the scientfic study. Someone mentione dthat this study is old so it is not a good study to rely as it was conducted 40-50 years ago. What kind if argument was this? If a study is old it does not mean it is not quotable and if a study is recent does not automatically make it a ground breaking study. If you as an adn=ministrator want to ban the article, go ahead an do it. Who cares about this Wikipedia site when it is managed by administrators like you. That is why it is said that little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Go ahead and ban me or whosoever you want to and ban this article. Next time when Wikipedia appeals for its users to sign the petition so that it not banned I will think twice because now I know it is run by some arrogant and biased people. You do not even know how to talk on the social site. i will be waiting for this candy on Halloween aka your ban, jerk. Sitush has mentioned as on March 6th 2012 somewhere else on Wiki site that he would read all the sources available in 3-4 days and then reach on a conlusion about this articel. he must be genius that he will read all these references written over such a long period of time and then decide in 3-4 days. What was he doing prior to March 6th and if did not ahve all the knowledge why was he suggesting corrections. It proves how biased he is? +Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? ==BeCauSe You aRe a FGGT! == Do I know you? BeCauSe +Dear Markussep! Surprising that you are so informed because many Dutchmans do not know that Hungary is exists.I copied these demographic data from the Hungarian wiki. After the Košice attack, Hungary sent a war message to the Soviet Union(Košice attack was on 26th June, in 1941).The situation was normal before here. North komárom' population was Hungarian totally in that time. Very much Jew lived in the North-Slovak city also ( about 89 000).The Jews 'mother language was Hungarian also. (talk • contribs) +Opinoso, please stop changing the number of German Brazilians to 5 million. I have found many websites with far higher estimates. Even Fernando Henrique Cardoso sites a minimum of 10 million German Brazilians in his book The Acccidental President of Brazil. I say we settle on 5-10 million German Brazilians. Thanks -VivaLatinAmerica +"::Until and unless the MOS section is actually changed, the article follows current WP:MOS#Dates, particularly WP:MOS#Full date formatting. The variety of English for the main body and related sections (composed in editors' own words) has been Australian English for some time: See archived discussions, which previously have cited WP:MOS#Varieties of English. Current WP:MOS#Dates and WP:MOS#Full date formatting are followed in this article. I and other editors of this article would appreciate your bringing to our attention if/when the MOS does change (in a stable way) re: ""full date formatting""; at that time, one could discuss whether or not and how to change to another kind of full date formatting based on its current guidelines or recommendations or requirements. " +Re: You said you apologized? No, you didn't. +I will switch the image once I get the Internet set up at my home. My laptop will die in 2 hours. (Sound Off) +I propose a new draft and instead of comemnting on it you ignore it, jam back in your preferred version, and insist that consensus is needed to remove your preferred version instead of to insert it in the first place. If anyone is filibustering here, pal, it is yourself. You make editing Wikipedia into a frigging nightmare. +@2001: it does seem strange that your edit request was reverted as vandalism. But maybe I don't know the whole story. (talk) (Please comment on my editor review.) +" Maybe we should be focusing on even 3000 FA articles instead.... White cat " +That is a clear personal attack right there, and I am disgusted an Admin like you would stoop to such levels. I want to take this up with the Arb committee. And to make sure there is no conflict of interest. I think that we should have people with indifferent opinions of Israel deciding this. +REDIRECT Talk:The Family Jewels (Marina and the Diamonds album) +Kiand, you should go and do something useful, besides sitting here waiting for someone to edit your pageoh wait, you have NO life. +Thanks! Thanks for helping edit Next Israeli legislative election +Harassment OK, I will let harass this guy if he don't harass me with my editing that isn't vandalic. 190.158.7.14 +Talkback == 108.85.24.203 == +" Please leave messages that need to be read on Tony Sidaway's talk page This bot is approved and doesn't need a flag. Except for tests, it's inactive. The software it runs is called . It's open source (BSD license) and written in compiled Chicken Scheme. Purpose This is to be a general purpose query engine for English Wikipedia, using a simple functional programming interface to permit queries of varying complexity to be performed, and the results delivered to a nominated page in the user's userspace and, optionally, sent to the user's enabled email address. Query language The query language is based on scheme, a dialect of the lisp family. If you can write a simple lisp expression you can query this bot. Typical query functions will look like: (whatlinkshere PAGE) Produces a list of pages that link to the page. (editorsof PAGE [datetime-since [datetime-to]])) Produces a list of unique usernames and IP numbers identifying all editors of the page (editsof PAGE [datetime-since [datetime-to]]) Produces a list of edits to the page (editsby USERNAME/IP [datetime-since [datetime-to]]) Produces a list of edits by the user (apply EXPR [PAR...] LIST) Applies the single expression, with optional parameters, to the list (map EXPR [PAR...] [LIST...]) Maps the single expression, with optional parameters, to the each member of the list. (list [EXPR...]) Composes a list of the expressions (email EXPR) Sends the result of evaluating the expression in email. The result will also appear on the wiki. Using the bot To register to use the bot, you must edit the bulleted list of usernames at User:TonyBot/Users to add a link to a page in your userspace. If you simply add your userpage (User:Example), then TonyBot will use the page User:Example/TonyBot to communicate with you. If you add another page in your userspace, then it will use that page instead of User:Example/TonyBot. To make a query, edit your TonyBot page to add the query. TonyBot will execute the query and edit your TonyBot page to provide a link to a page containing the results. This will be at User:TonyBot/Example/N where N is a numeric value which has meaning only to the bot. Limitations Queries that take too long to execute may be stopped before completion Queries that are judged too complex will be rejected Queries that return very large volumes of data may be rejected or cut short. The value of ""too long"", ""too complex"" and ""very large"" may vary over time in an unpredictable way. Conditions of use This bot is an experimental service and is provided as-is. Queries are run at the discretion of the bot operator and subject to the operational requirements of Wikipedia's services. It may be subject to unplanned outages, and may disappear without warning, at the discretion of the operator and subject to the wishes of the community. All queries must be made by registered Wikipedia users, in public, on the wiki. The bot owner reserves the right, for good reason and with the interests of Wikipedia in mind, to refuse access to any user. The reason for refusal will be stated publicly on the user's talk page and may be subject to revision if you can somehow successfully cajole, persuade or provide reasonable reassurances. See also Bot policy (WP:BOT) Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/TonyBot" +I agree!, just look at the lyrics and you will throw up, how disgusting.] +Please check. I think you will find that in numbers of words St. Luke has more. +" Anti-Semitic People category discussion Just wanted to say that I stumbled upon the above category and have just voted to keep. I thought your comments in the voting category were quite good. Is that the only place where the subject of this category is being discussed? Thanks very much. Interesting discussion. .38 Calibre I note that you have once again removed the copyvio template from the .38 Calibre article and retained the copyrighted material. In light of that, I have reverted the page to the template and protected the page from further editing, until the issue is resolved. Please see the talk page for my explanation of why this is a copyvio and what needs to be done to resolve it. Talk Big Bear Please don't add Category:First Nations people to articles that are already filed in a subcategory such as Category:First Nations leaders or Category:First Nations writers. Wikipedia has a rule against duplicate categorization. Thanks. Copyvios Thank you for fixing the violations. I admit I was a bit overzellous on my second listing of Wandering Spirit (Aboriginal), and for that I apologize. Beyond that, things look fine now. - Oh, and I am male, not that there's really anything on my user page to indicate one way or another. ) - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Please do not add Category:Anti-Semitic people to the article. It is very controversial and there is a discussion about it on Talk:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad#Category:Anti-Semitic people. // Categorization of user pages Thanks for removing categorization on my user page. user:liftarn should probably be noted too, he is the one who added it. Heptor talk I didn't notice you already gave him a warning on an unrelated incident. In case you didn't read the discussion I had with him on his talk page, you are not the only one who ""wish"". Heptor talk Accusations of editors being Anti-Semites Greetings, It's been brought to my attention that you are spreading word in a personal attack fashion that those who've recieved a barnstar for their contributions on Islamic topics are anti-semites. I highly recommend that you 1. cease from making false accusations immediately and 2. remove all previous talk pages messages saying as much. If you do not follow this advice you will likely face being blocked as a Wikipedia editor. Sincerely, Scott Stevenson Mr.Brock, in reference to your recent incivil post on Netscott's page, and the posts to which he refers above: personal attacks are not allowed on Wikipedia. It's that simple. Don't make them. WP:ANI report Greetings, please be aware of this report concerning you. Blocked I've blocked you for one week for disruption and personnal attacks in your recent allegations of anti-semitism against several editors. If you want to discuss it, I suggest you approach another admin who is more likely to be sympathetic to whatever case you can make. Talk YOU are what YOU are. No apologies will be given from me ! See YOU and your buds in a week! Comment on User:Jew's page Highly inappropriate. I'm not an Anti-Semite. See WP:NPA. BhaiSaab talk 00:56, 3 June 20 +The trouble with WIKIPEDIA is you sadly get self righteous know-alls who ADD NOTHING to the site, but act like they should police it & delete and tell others they are better than those who actually ADD something. Some repeatedly DISRUPT another's writings & delete it causing offence & an UNDO. No-one else thinks what is written is not OK, only these tiny few THIS IS MY PAGE, I do not invite you to add anything to it if you are one of those tiresome sorts mentioned above. You will be deleted. I do not care or respect you or want to know, you should just fade away & I doubt Wikipedia would miss you either. I have encountered this sort of person before, y'see... If you indeed knew I really was a public school educated middle class high IQ white man like you claim to be (ha!) then perhaps you'd take a hike and not pick so. +" There is vastly more to an unholy alliance than campaign contributions. The fake opposition of the ""opposing"" parties usually involves one taking a high moral tone, crusading preachers or government officials who are going ""stamp out X"" or ""regulate Y"" or bring a ""newer, deeper understanding of Z"" if folks will just have faith. It is this last example that relates to Nazi occultism, a sort of hocus-pocus preast-craft to distract the lumpen proletariat from the enormity of Nazi intentions. Likewise, some on the Left stand accused of a double standard w.r.t. Islamist terrorism, again, adopting a high moral tone that masks their acceptance of it. When done to confuse the public, for personal gain, and it works, it's corrupt, politically, i.e., results in policies that do not accomplish their stated purpose, but rather benefit only a few, inside the alliance." +" Thanks. Indeed it was the incorrect name right from when it was introduced into the article, even though the cited source had the correct names. Best wishes, (talk)(contribs) " +Template:Infobox Chinese The infobox still displays the Middle Chinese header even if nothing is filled in. Just letting you know. Cheers, +I'm glad that you've found what the source actually states regarding the use of the .357 Magnum ) It's unfortunate that you didn't cite the actual text of the source in your previous comments, instead describing the purported incongruity between the existing language of the article (which has no status as source material) and the image caption. Really, if you thought that the image caption wasn't supported by the source cited, wouldn't the relevant text of the source itself be exhibit A in demonstrating your claim? +2007 (UTC) Altova DiffDog is one...it is listed in the first table, but not the features tables. 15:06, 19 September +Which of the text around the original article was copyrighted material??← +Black Veil Brides Hello, he forgives that it is a nuisance in your page of discussion, but it wanted to ask you if you can restore the article Black Veil Brides, I have assembled more sources and resources of information about the band, biography and current importance, but if your you have the base, please, he would ask you if you can answer this message to me. Thank you. ; UltraHeadShot +sikh history gezzaa user:sikh history wiki pedia full on shit!! Surinder Shinda, Sukshinder Shinda is shinda surname not other surnames shinda is shinda ramgarhia surname! user:sikh history you talk shit 86.166.250.11 +WBC talk page What you did went way beyond refactoring - you removed comments. +Contested deletion This page should not be speedily deleted because... (possible vandalism ) +== Hi! I'm sure you know that there is a deletion process. If you want to keep an article, feel free to vote for it, but don't removed it, that is abuse of process. Thanks, 22:22, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) +I came over here to suggest the same thing. +So I read the archive and found no reason why Spain should be placed in a separate category than Danmark. +As a note, I made the following changes to the section:. 134.255.247.88 +" Quit the crap. That is such a reach that it looks silly. To start with it is a symmetric statement which says the same about everybody that is either for or against. North8000 " +It's hard to tell how many we have missed and it is very likely that there are less information available on small projects. Stuart Staniford has tried to extraploate how much we may have missed (see this chart). Currently there are about 440 entries in the database. +" Congratulations! Dear , Congratulations on your new family!!! D I had no idea that you were a ""cat person"". I hope mother and kitties are doing well, and will bring you lots of joy as they grow up. My own kitties are full-grown (but still mischievous, not surprisingly), but I'm getting some of the same feeling every day as flowers bloom and berries swell in my garden. Some of my strawberries are almost ready to eat — yum! ) Good luck with evo-devo, comments to follow when I get a chance, " +But not every genre on each page has a source. Don't u know that? +Excuse me, this is a school library IP. Can you really punish the entire school for the vandalising actions of just a few. Seems like an injustice to me, though I do not know the wikipedia's policies on this matter. Thank you. ~Jesse S. of Winnacunnet High School Hampton NH +Sockpuppets Instead of engaging in potentially endless edit wars with clearly sockpuppets of +Holy Cow! You're Faster that the Speed of Light (headedness)! +" A brownie for you! " +Looks like I got back to my computer a few minutes too late. I'm sorry to hear of such a terrible loss and I wish you strength at getting through it. I'll try to keep an eye out for any other shenanigans. I'm not sure what more can be done except to keep track of all the IP's used to possibly file an abuse report with the service provider. +Would you be kind enough to raise such questions at wp:mosnum? I am not sure if I can help you with the answers. +DOUUUCHHHHEEEEBAGGGGGGG. take it eeeeaaassssyyyyy, bro! +" Ubique I have undone your edit to K Battery Royal Artillery where your edit summary was Unlinked: Ubique; no evidence for notability for this honour. Just to clarify, Ubique is the only Battle Honour of the Royal Artillery, Royal Horse Artillery and the Royal Engineers. The Royal Artillery was present in nearly all battles and would have earned most of the honours awarded to cavalry and infantry regiments. In 1833, William IV awarded the motto Ubique (meaning ""everywhere"") in place of all battle honours. " +" It is exactly about that. we don't know when he would take office - he has to receive a mandate from Josipović once the election results are official, then the Sabor has to convene and then they have to vote for the new government. Nobody knows when that would happen so instead of guesswork the infobox should say ""To be determined"". (''talk) " +Thanks for your help, I'll go get a newspaper article and re - add the material - stupid me, I should have thought of such a simple thing! Thanks for your help. +the 'content' removed was just meaningless lists. if you actually read what i had done you would see that the content removed was useless and i had made a lot of other changes too that improved the article. +" Eighth, I will try to split the difference by changing my username to ""lunarmoonbatssuck.""" +What Do You Think You Are Doing? Hi. I have just checked the Tulsa 66ers page and the red and yellow colors are incorrect. Although they use the colors, they don't use them on their uniforms or as the main colors on the logo. Their is some yellow on the logo, but their is not a lot of red on it. Could you please fix them? Thanks, Infonerd2216 +my email is armenian_nj@yahoo.com >ban unes aselu asa. +Image copyright problem with Image:Imperialgovernor.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Imperialgovernor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. babelfish +" It's Nik - and my pleasure! If I'm ever in Illinois I'll hold you to that thestunned " +Your low self esteem should not manifest on Wikipedia I understand that you have a very low self esteem and this results in lying and manipulating history to make yourself look better but this has no place on Wikipedia or any other academic website. Please keep your ideology and emotions away from your editing, thanks. 69.158.28.97 +The information about the master class system in the link you provided describes the system as it existed in the 21st century, not in 1961. It has no bearing whatsoever on this argument. You're grasping at straws. Keep it on topic please. +arr, gone. I do see that Argonne is mentioned above; but it is not in the actual article. Considering that it is published on a government webpage, & seemingly well written, I do not comprehend why most, or all, of it is not simply copied. With these factors the only necessary editing is regarding any format corrections to fit these pages. Is there any assertion that it is less than accurate? I just learned of this from Keith_Olbermann, msnbc. < http://www.anl.gov/Media_Center/News/History/news960206.html >. [[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. %7e%7e Thank You. -]] +"== Harassment == Users are assumed to have read and understood messages if they remove them from their talkpages. Continued replacement is considered harassment. Please stop. (talk) " +AFD's are for deleting things. This article should be a redirect, which is an editorial decision. At some point, someone might want to merge content from this article to the main article, so the history should be preserved. Since no one wants to delete the article, why AFD it? +they are required to train to be airborne qual, as are most special ops soldiers +Oooooh aren't you a sharp one! Well then, you'd better run around undoing all the basic and obvious changes you can find, lying about me, falsely accusing me of vandalism, and leaving me inane messages. Have fun! 186.9.130.34 +do you know that girl NwJerseyLiz? She did stupid things on wikipedia. Be carefull! +You're confusing neutrality with fallacy. The evidence against Hamas was woefully understated, which I gladly improved. Syntax is a non-issue here; grammar is hardly an excuse for misinformation. I changed killing to execution because Hamas orchestrated a systematic execution of Fatah and its supporters. As in, they lined them up on a wall and shot them in the face. They weren't simply casualties of war, they were executed as individuals. Get it? You being the creator of the article is irrelevant, and in no way gives you ownership of articles - per Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. You say you are not the owner of the article, but seem to be infatuated with the fact that you started it, and that somehow gives you the right to tell me and everyone how it should be written. If syntax is your concern, go ahead and edit the article according to your standards of English. But if that conflicts with my concern for facts and truth, then I will most certainly edit it. I offered a very lengthy explanation for my edits in the talk section. Also, I didn't mean to edit your user page template. +3RR You hve reverted this statement more than 3 times in one day - please stop as you can be blocked for it. Please discuss rationally your reasons and preferred wording at Talk:KTVX-TV. +", 12 May 2014 (UTC) I have no objections to making the edit once a consensus has been reached in the bigger gender debate further up. But until then I prefer having it as it is, as a reminder to new ""gender warriors"" that Tom Neuwirth considers himself to be a man. And, after all, who would know that better than him? talk 16:59" +hey Mo. This will be my last post, so feel free to block me. Now... how about all YOUR personal attacks and attacks from your friends like mongo the past year? Have they ever been blocked? No they haven't. There's enough ppl involved now and I guarantee that all you editor idiots are going to be replaced in a couple months by people who have a clue to what's going on in the world. I don't take warnings from you, you bumbling FOOL! You people are disgusting treasonous scum. If this country goes down, you will have deserved it, as you are doing nothing but assisting it in happening. You, MONGO, tom harrison, and other nazi scum can all go to hell. +"::Hi, Dusti. I have been on Wikipedia for many years and have made thousands of constructive edits. It is the Wikipedia admins and wannabe admins who annoy me into doing faecal things. Wouldn't it be nice if people checked first before calling something vandalism or ""unconstructive edit""? 70.76.85.36 " +It doesn't matter at all what the content was when you violated WP:3RR. Anyone would have gotten blocked by any administrator for having made the same reverts you did. ∇∆∇∆ +Works How can he have a Symphony no. 5 without having no. 1, 2, 3 and 4? Is that just because it was the only symphony which he released, or does he pick random numbers for his symphonies? ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ +Ways to improve Rosie Fellner Hi, I'm Kudpung. Turskellies, thanks for creating Rosie Fellner! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease take a moment to return to the article and address the tagged issues. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. +A second IP address whose only edit is about me has just arrived to comment at the AN/I. +Completed item 1, when you're done with item 2, we should take a serious look at FL listing. +That being said, as I said over at that discussion I was only going to make the one comment there and that was it. If it ends up going to AN for an official request to remove the topic ban then I will likely comment there. But I am done over at Steve's page. - +FA criteria Hi, could you have a look at WT:FA?#Minor redundancy? (Sandy suggested I ping you.) Ucucha +The ambiguity in the article (ie that he is entitled to use it for life) is unsourced, and for the moment I am removing it as original research, pending references. +What bot?75.139.111.29 +" you're wrong; IAR applies to admins and regular editors alike. You have provided no evidence of that. As I said, I have the facts and you guys just have bullshit. What is a ""regular"" editor? I am not a ""regular"" editor I am an occasional editor. The ""Ignore All Rules"" rule does not mean there can be one set of rule exceptions for you and another set of rule exceptions for me. We can agree on an exception to the rules, but the exception must apply equally to both of us. For example, we could agree that it is OK here to break the Wikipedia rule against using personal blogs as sources. But that would mean that links to my blog must be allowed here and could not be excluded by arbitrary, discriminatory distinctions between ""crappy"" personal blogs and ""reputable"" personal blogs. As Fatheaded Ed Brayton would say, you are full of batshit wingnuttery. " +Oh, ok. I see now D +" :Image:Alexandra bombarding alexandria.jpg has been listed for deletion An image that you uploaded, Image:Alexandra bombarding alexandria.jpg, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it lacks source or license information, and has been tagged as lacing this information for at elast 7 days. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/Media (criterion I4) Please add source and copyright information to this image promptly, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (talk) " +" Ita140188, if you really want ""as much information as possible"" on Wikipedia then why have you supported the merger of the page specifically about the EuroVelo 7 with its parent page (i.e. EuroVelo) when it is clear that the EV7 page has greatly expanded information including an overview map and some images? It seem completely incongruous with what you've said above. Surely we should be expanding Wikipedia, not stunting its growth? In any case, the EV7 page is set to be expanded (by me) hopefully others will too... feel free to help! " +DMacks and DavidWS 3 words, GO FUCK YOURSELVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +I am sorry, but someone who claims to have been sainted by the catholic church and uses it as a username is probably a user I need to avoid interacting with, but thanks. It's kind of like claiming you are a PhD or a Dr or MD when you are not (Essjay???). I am just not comfortable with it. I am sorry, please understand. 67.182.221.82 +My reference is a book, The Kemantney Language. However, the figure is confirmed by Ethnologue, Humboldt-Kosmos, and Dr. David Appleyard, and derives ultimately from the national census. - 21:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) +" Nice tavern article Articles like this are the joy of Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. Thanks. I appreciate it. I plan to eat there for the first time in two weeks. Seek his grace " +" The ""end of the world"" meme started with Forstemann, who misinterpreted the Dresden Codex, spread by Morley, who influenced Arguelles and Coe. Coe influenced Waters who influenced Jenkins who was published by Bear & Co. ~*~ M ~*~ " +" Plato most definitely wasn't any sort of communist. So I have no problem removing all references to the proto-fascist bastard who wanted to systematically lie to the population and also remove art from his ""Republic"". (Fuck you!) " +Just thought I would say thank you !! +upper case used by Category:Historical Indian empires +Notable alumni == This section badly needs cleaning up. I am happy so to do but I should like to seek support, here, first. A prerequisite is that attendance at the school should be reliably sourced - no source must mean no inclusion. The second prerequisite is notability. A page is not needed to demonstrate notability but it helps! Looking at the red-links some have no claims to notability and for some the claims can be simply tested. Take Mike Pointing for example. If he has played in a competitive match for Harlequins first team then he meets WP:Athlete. If he has just played for their academy then he doesn't. If Michael Latham is an influential film-maker why doesn't he have a page? My view is that if an editor thinks that an alumnus is notable and feels strongly that they should be included in this list then write a stub! It is always quicker to write a stub than have a long debate trying to establish their notability separately. To deal with this situation efficiently I am proposing that red-linked or unsourced people should be moved here. This preserves the information that we have about them and they can then be moved back to the article as sources are found or notability is demonstrated. Views, please. I'm with you, TerriersFan. Move the redlinks here or give a diff to the deletion; they can be added back when the burden of proof is met. I too agree with your suggestion. Thanks for taking this on. == +" You might be best reading that your self ""Try to avoid linking to multiple pages from the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site."" thanks/ Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 " +I would not condescend to it. Speak to me never. +" Calling all active WP:NOVELS members WikiProject Novels Roll Call WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved! Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! (habla conmigo) " +" Also, to be clear, I understand the word ""progressive"" is used in their About section but I'm not convinced that they mean it in the traditional political sense. " +" Morgellon Addressing the physiological aspect of the Morgellon disease, the wiki article should be completed with data extracted from the National Center for Biotechnology Information here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257881/#!po=5.00000 Hopefully someone (maybe you) should make the time and properly review the Morgellon wiki article that is presently addressing just the ""psycho"" part of the disease. If doctors and scientists take their time and study this condition seriously, not just labeling it ""delusional belief"" and put the a lid on it, I think the Wikipedia users can do the same and make the articles in such manner to reflect all points of view, not just the old, superficial ones. I hope you will find the time and take a look at the info before discarding it as before." +" Sorry, I was called to supper, hastily finished a message here, pressed ""Save page"", and didn't stay to see the ""Edit conflict"" response. My message said: No, sorry, it's a copyright violation from the organization's website (as might have been guessed from its tone), so I have also deleted copies from the user's user page and sandbox. I am about to write an explanation of the copyright issue, and also that (as Jayron32 said on the Teahouse Q&A; page) ""the article gives no indication it meets Wikipedia's minimum standards for inclusion, and the tone is wholly inappropriate for an encyclopedia."" " +AFD Discussion Hello. You, several other editors, and I were involved in an AFD discussion in the past here. At the time you and I agreed, but perhaps you will not here. On this particular occasion, I am involved in an AFD discussion, here. Your participation, not contingent upon taking any particular side, would be greatly appreciated. +Stilwater Why did you place a deletion tag on the article Stilwater? It needs to be cleaned up and rescued, not deleted. Please explain your reason behind the deletion tag on my talk page. 60.242.127.62 60.242.127.62 +Scat & BDSM Hi, I was wondering if faggots as large as you participate in these sexual practices as apart of your regular daily routine? +" Seems that on this subject there is a real war (just click on ""History"" for the offensive comments deleted by ). Will it ever be possible to carry out a NPOV discussion on this matter, without slinging mud at each other? " +", 12 December 2011 (UTC) Wow, that's really cool! Thanks for letting me know. – (talk) 22:34" +Ok, just to clarify, I wasn't questioning the decision (I think it should have been kept), but I was just wondering about the wording that was used, as I was under the impression no consensus BLPs defaulted to delete, but thanks for clearing that up Wordsmith. Also, Tofutwitch, I apologise if I sounded a bit harsh in my first comment, I wasn't trying to question your judgment or anything, and I hope you continue to be bold ;) +" Religion In the section titled ""Religion"", could someone add Progressive Islam? It is a liberal branch of Islam that I believe recognizes same-sex marriage." +"Why not just be honest and complete and call it ""Illegal Signal Videotaping Incident""? And you should state the league did not demand that the cheaters hand over tapes from all the previous years of illegal signal video taping! " +" Ed, we all have our biases, you and me both. My concern about the article is that it needs to cover a lot of bases. Broadly speaking, to be fair to all parties concerned, let's acknowledge that a) damaging quotations are a part and parcel of partisan politics, b) there is debate about whether and when such quotations are legitimate, because c) some can be taken out of context, while d) different politicians exhibit different speaking styles and such styles can be the source of parody and such parodies are often based on at least some degree of truth, and e) sometimes politicians really are dumbasses. Taken in a broader context, that is how artististic political characaturists and comic impressionists make their living. Did Carter really smile broadly and instantly? Did Ronald Reagan really say ""Well"" at the beginning of sentences? Where would we be without Dana Carvey and Rich Little? Obviously, this is an issue that both you and I feel strongly about. Perhaps our biases just clash. Maybe we need other people to delve into the articles and try to write something from a perspective that is neither yours nor mine. " +) Archive 3 (September 2006 - December 2007 +Hi, the links work for me now, so must've been something temporary with the site that's why I AGFed, you never know... ;-) Cheers, +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.153.245 " +Dryvyng I've added some material on Dryvyng, Brittain & Trahain's new venture, as well as giving a redirect for that term here, as it is getting coverage and that coverage is largely within the context of IsAnybodyDown; beyond the example used as reference, you can also see that this Business Insider article both opens and ends with invocation of that website. +I do not dispute that. Unfortunately for you however, it is entirely irrelevant. +I believe this controvery should be added to the article. The verichip has been discontinued due such controversies. This subject needs some exploration and a section on this controvery needs to be included in the article. 91.121.178.135 +" Well,When Did the Fued Begin?And What year was ""Loose Change"" recorded? MRivera25" +NYC meetup I'll be there (as long as things go according to plan). +" ANI Notice FYI, I didn't mention you by name, but I listed a few diffs involving you at ANI here. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks.   — · Δ♥ " +If you read the opening remarks, the above quotes are obviously just filler to make TAS feel better. The main point of the opening remarks is clearly the quoted section. +William M. Murray Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed the AFD tag from William M. Murray. Please do not do this. The article is being discussed, and a concensus will be reached on whether it is deleted or not. Thank you. +" By all means. I never did get around to making the level 201 lessons. I probably should I suppose; perhaps we can figure out some things that would be more 'advanced' work? I was thinking a GA would be good, but I can't at this late date recall what else I had been thinking. →  ₪ " +added response to your reply on my talk page Thanks, +Why is the top 10 in the world university Adelaide Uni being blocked LOL? +GOD BLESS OUR FREEDOM FIGHTING TROOPS DEFEATING ARAB TERRORISM IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. DEFEAT totalitarian Islamofascism Our commander in chief liberated Iraq and Afganistan. But there's much left to TAKE OUT and LIBERATE. These are the regimes that we need to effect a regime change sooner or later: Most urgent: Iran, Syria, Communist China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Liberia, Laos, Lebanon, Vietnam, Libya, Zimbabwe, Burma, Malaysia, Belarus, Venezuela, Moldova (elected an actual Communist Party member) Palestinian Authority Less urgent, but necessary one day: Brazil (I laid out a case for regime change in Brazil on another user's page. If you're interested, I can direct you to that page.), Ecuador (elected a Communist), Argentina (elected a Communist sympathizer), Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Pakistan (the military dictator they have is ok to keep a lid on the Islamists, but he'll fall one day so we might as well occupy them), Qatar (Al Jazeria is based there spewing its anti-American propaganda), Tunisia, and every other country that is not a democracy or is a democracy that elects anti-democratic leftists like Hugo Chavez Countries we should destabilize, but not necessarily prusue regime change through military means: France, Germany, Belgium, Canada, Mexico, South Africa, Turkey, Russia, Sweden, and more... Countries WHERE FREEDOM RINGS AMERICA (NUMBER ONE ON THIS ACCOUNT), UK, Australia, Israel, Italy , Spain, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Czech Republic, and more... +Article reads like an advertisment This article reads like an advertisement. Nearly half the references, at the time of this reading, are to it's own websites, youtube channel... +BTW, you should ask your uncle, maybe he trampled down the women. +" you see ... Gatoclass is helping me because I am mentally ""wiki"" challenged as a 'right brainer'..... so... I have tried to upload but the best i could do was get in my 'contributions' file...... anyway... I am appreciative of everyone patience with me" +Can we have some references? +" Jesus article and the cultural and historical background. There is a long discussion of the Historical Jesus at Talk:Jesus#Scholarly_views_of_the_historical_Jesus. It's divided into three categories: Jesus as moral teacher; Jesus as apocalyptic prophet; and Jesus in comparison to Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots and Essenes. The last category in particular could be informed by this article. Talk " +Image:Lazytownlogo2008.gif listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lazytownlogo2008.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +From user 's page: General thought If you believe that change is necessary to bring Wikipedia out of the stone ages, make it happen! That is how Wikipedia evolves. Don't let stubborn editors stuck in the past get in your way. Work for the greater good, not the good of those stuck in their ways. There are ways and means of making change happen, any reasonable change will gather support from those that want it. Yeah yeah.... you're full of it. +Until someone gets the info about all these other investors and posts it, doesn't it make sense to list the investors we do know of? Isn't Bin Laden worth mentioning? Let's not let the limited information on Carlyle's investors stop us from providing the info we do have because we're trying to maintain NPOV, particularly when the information is clearly compelling, relevant to understanding at least one view of Carlyle group, and possibly meaningful. The weasel words and the original research warnings are not necessary, at least for the Controversy section. And, I changed some of the weasel words in the Controversy section, although the meaning remains largely the same how else are we to provide the information, which is pertinent, about how an issue or thing is perceived by people?! +Tragic new developments on my talk page. Regards – +") An Introduction to Wavelets Through Linear Algebra ""Figure 22 shows the graphs of a few 4th level real Shannon wavelet basis functions ..."" (p 233" +JACK OFF DUMMAY!!! stop lying to yourself wikipedia has always been and always will be a WARZONE a war between vandals antivandal wikipedians and edit warmen with REAL wikipedians as overseers if you keep insisting that it is not then i have to sincerely ask you to JACK OFF DUMMAY!!! also dont mess with my talk page i have been unjustly put in jail for a warcrime i didnt commit and the last thing i want is the record of it hanging around as proof +Obviously not going to be in the FT! Claire Sweeny is a major British star, appearing in Brookside and Chicago to name a few. How dare Clinton make sexual advances to a British household name in this way, and why cover it up? It is all over the papers here and everybody is talking about it. I was talking to my friend Michelle a few hours ago and my sister even txt'd me about it. +=== I AM GLEN AND I LOVE BEING A FAG=== +Illyrians, hallstatt Hey Z. I am curious about the influence of Hallstat culture on Illyrians. is your arguement that its presence was largely confined to Pannonia , whilst the Illyrians had tjeir own, independent cuklture that eveolved endogenously in the Balkans theough the Bronze age ? +User troy has deliberately erased a comment made by me on the discussion page of pope shenouda. Therefore, he is in breach with wikipedia policy, and should be reminded not to erase comments he feels is an insult to him. 77.248.185.98 And he may also be reminded that this is not a religious website and certainly not the religious website of the patriarchate of alexandria, and these vandalistic removing acts should be condemned in this encyclopedia where everyone has a right to express his opinion on discussion pages regarding issues 77.248.185.98 +Conflict of interest — ✉ +Here we are!!! I was waiting for this kind of xxx comment (xxx is to spare the appropriate word to qualify SupaStarGirl's comment!!). The articles on Wikipedia do not belong anymore to anybody once they are posted!!! It means that anybody can come and modify these articles at will, irrespective of the original persons who posted them. So, your remark SupaStarGirl is not a remark from a Star at Wikipedia I could say!!! MichaelIsGreat Anymore comments before I close the discussion on this article? And move on with my life (that is not fpcused on wasting it trying to write a PERFECT article (!!!) Once the discussion is over, I will republish the article with the changes I made and we will all have to leave in peace this article if those among you who censored my useful contribution are capable of such a normal behaviour (I very much doubt it!). MichaelIsGreat +Npov tag Does the person who placed this tag (or anyone else for that matter) have any actual specific bits they want to change as i feel this tag has to go if no arguements are put forward to support it. +" November 2015 Hello, Callmemirela! It is nice to meet you. Your help in improving the page for Criminal Minds (season 11), specifically the episode section, is much appreciated!I'm glad you kept me on my toes about putting the episode summary in my own words, so as not to violate any copyright laws; for that I'm quite grateful to you. Criminal Minds is, by far, my favorite show and I love to help keep fellow fans informed. However, in my entire time editing Criminal Minds pages - which has been a little while; while I am fairly new to Wikipedia, this account was created with the (2) at the end because my previous account of the same name was inaccessible because I forgot my password lol - I have not once, by any editor, been asked/required to provide refernces for the production codes. Title, writer, director, and air date absolutely require references! But the production code is usually confirmed in one of the references whether it be title, writer, director, air date or any combination therein, added to the fact that the air dates can help determine the order in which the episodes will air, they are almost always confirmed. Although, I have come to understand there can be an exception in which the production codes can serve quite useful! This is when episodes air out of order, an example of which would be in Season 10, 1006, ""Boxed In"", was aired before 1005, ""If the Shoe Fits"", because ""Boxed In"" was the Halloween episode and it was scheduled to air on 11/05 whereas ""If the Shoe Fits"" was scheduled to air on 10/29; to resolve this, they merely switched their air dates, however, the production codes remained the same, therefore letting people know that they were aired out of order to accommodate Halloween. In that case, I believe it was briefly required to include references with the production codes. That, however, was the only time I've ever been required to provide a reference for a production code. I've posted references for all of the upcoming production codes to satisfy your need for me to do so and prove to you that I would not post those codes without knowing that their validity can eventually be found through other references. In conclusion, I absolutely agree with you that I needed to avoid violating copyright by denoting the summaries in a vernacular (lexicon; vocabulary; my own words) more unique to me, basically, to make them be more so in my own words, but I don't agree that the production codes need referencing. You are the first person who has ever asked me to do so. I do want you to know, though, that I always use reliable references for my episode title, writer, director and/or air date contributions, and that I take copyright violation (avoiding it!) very seriously! I really appreciate your willingness to help make the page as accurate as possible; that is my objective as well. I just don't think that it is necessary to reference the production codes, since all episodes have aired in order, thus far, and we (the fans) have been given no reason to believe they won't continue to do so. When it is required due to scheduling changes, I'd be happy to post it. I hope we can resolve this minor misunderstanding. Happy editing! Bef3481(2) " +" Let this be your SECOND warning. Do not revert again as they do not meet Wikipedia guidelines. Please read the following: In other words Don't add names that do not have an article! hornetfan " +RE THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE: +Margarine in your Potato I put a block of margarine in my potato, put in the microwave: BIG MISTAKE! potato was covered in plastic substance eew D: +" hydroelectric dams, Although hydroelectric power is admittedly one of the cleanest and most environmentally-friendly sources of energy, it too has the capability to alter or damage its surroundings. Among the main problems that have been demonstrated by hydroelectric power is significant change in water quality. Because of the nature of hydroelectric systems, the water often takes on a higher temperature, loses oxygen content, experiences siltation, and gains in phosphorus and nitrogen content. Man has utilized the power of water for years. Much of the growth of early colonial American industry can be attributed to hydropower. Because fuel such as coal and wood were not readily available to inland cities, American settlers were forced to turn to other alternatives. Falling water was ideal for powering sawmills and grist mills. As coal became a better-developed source of fuel, however, the importance of hydropower decreased. When canals began to be built off of the Mississippi River, inland cities became linked to mainstream commerce. This opened the flow of coal to most areas of America, dealing the final blow to hydropower in early America. Water power really didn't stage a major comeback until the 20th century. The development of an electric generator helped increase hydropower's importance. In the mid-20th century, as Americans began to move out of the cities and into ""suburbia,"" the demand for electricity increased, as did the role of hydroelectricity. Hydroelectric power plants were built near large cities to supplement power production. Disadvantages Smaller models depend on availability of fast flowing streams or rivers Run-of-the-River plants can impact the mobility of fish and other riverlife. NOTE: Building a fish ladder can lessen this negative aspect of hydroelectric power Hydropower had some help from the federal government in being established in America. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was implemented during the Great Depression of the 1930s. The program was designed to correct several problems in the Tennessee River Basin. These problems included frequent floods, erosion, and deforestation. The TVA provided for the building of several hydroelectric dams. Not only were the dams successful in controlling the flooding, they also provide electricity to the region. The TVA is an example of successful implementation of hydroelectric power. There are many different ways in which the abundance of energy around us can be stored, converted, and amplified for our use. To help you understand the key energy sources that will play an important role in the world's future, we have designed a number of pages to familiarize you with some of the history, theory, economics, and problems of the various types of energy. The energy sources have been split into three categories: fossil fuels, renewable sources, and nuclear sources. The fossil fuels covered here are coal, petroleum, and natural gas. The renewable energy sources are solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, and geothermal power. The nuclear-powered sources are fission and fusion. IF YOU WANT ANSWERS WRITE BACK TO ME TO MY EMAIL AT jnaasz2cool4u@hotmail.com" +October 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +22:03, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC) Use most common name. +" edits in Jan., 2012 Thank you for recently updating this article. I hope you continue. This article has had many adverse edits in the past and I try to keep it within Wikipedia's standards. If a statement with two facts is supported by a source and one fact and the source are updated, check whether the source is positioned in the sentence to make it look like the source also supports the other fact. Then be sure the source does support both facts. Otherwise, readers will be misled. If that source does not actually support the second fact, you should find a source for the second fact or preserve the original source and place or edit it so that readers will know which fact is supported by which source. If a fact does not have a source cited for it, the fact can be challenged, edited, or deleted by any editor (the exception being, as Wikipedians sometimes say, that no source is needed for the fact that ""the sky is blue"", or for any fact not likely to be challenged). Much about HSA has been challenged in the past (possibly because of political dislike toward Dr. Moskowitz) and sourcing should be carefully done. Sources should be secondary, meaning at least one level removed from personal experience. Usually, that means an independent third-party reliable source. By contrast, for example, SA's website is a primary source about SA. Self-statements are primary sources. Primary sources are allowed but must be used with greater care and generally should be shunned (except in the External Links section, for example). Try to find secondary sources wherever possible. Part of Wikipedia's standard is at WP:PSTS. The lede (sometimes spelled ""lead"") should be a summary of the body of the article, so it doesn't get a reference. Because the lede is a summary, any statement in the lede should essentially be in the body, too, so the reference should be positioned where the body's statement is. A tendency to write an article like an advertisement sometimes crops up. The recent edits to this article were mild in that regard; I've seen a much more obvious case recently in another article. While this school network has remarkable achievements that should be described, legitimately sourced criticisms also have to be included or preserved. Articles that are too much like ads are subject to severe rewritings or reversions to earlier revisions, often by editors less familiar with the subject. Ref elements generally follow punctuation. For example, we'd write, ""This is a fact,Source A. and this is another fact.Source B."" Images need alt texts, so that people who are blind or visually impaired can have their browsers read aloud information about a picture. The old image also lacked an alt text for a long time and now I've added one (I could have long ago but didn't get to it). If you create a new image and add it, please add an alt text with it. Thank you again for your work. " +Good call Good block. +Proxy test. 78.154.152.57 +No problems. If says he wants to reference it he probably will but I couldn't find any substantial sources beyond the IMDB mention. +" Original research at Pirkei Avot What you're doing at Pirkei Avot looks cool. But I'd suggest that you post it on a blog. You're violating both WP:SYNTH and WP:OR by doing it on Wikipedia. I'm pointing this out because it will eventually be deleted, and it seem like you're putting a lot of work into it. It would be a shame for you to do that when there's no hope of it remaining in the article. Also, the second line of ""im ein ani li mi li"" does not contain the word ""only"". That's a common mistranslation. - " +Deepak, considering the nature of the controversy it would be naive to expect students to identify themselves. I understand your concerns but the website just needs to be read in detail to understand that it is genuine. I know the people running the site, but I know my word won't be enough. This is a bit of a Catch-22 isn't it? +" I used the template mentioned at the top of WP:ANI. And it was , the admin who wrote ""Nuke the spoiler template. Nuke all ""spoiler"" policies."" who suggested I be blocked. I really don't care what thinks. I've run into him plenty of times at WP:SPOILER. I also don't care what thinks. I've run into him plenty of times at Million Dollar Baby, one of those articles you refer to. I don't care what thinks. I've run into him plenty of times at Eastern Promises, one of those articles you refer to. And I don't care what or think, they appear to me to have shown up at WP:ANI after arguing to delete 2 templates I created. I suppose I should start my own little mailing list to get people to do what I want for me on Wikipedia, since I'm so ""bad at getting consensus to swing my way."" May I suggest you make to change a guideline on Wikipedia before you tell mailing list subscribers ""Could all reading this please go to the above URL and get hacking?""? " +Waseem Akhtar That was a spectacularly bad speedy deletion nomination  not? +hitler was a duechebag +List of highways numbered 383 Why did you revert my edits? +, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Since posting the above, I found a link to Fowler's actual handwritten complaints. To the extent I can understand them, it appears he alleges that the publishers deliberately mistranslated the Bible into English to make it appear anti-homosexual. Whatever you think of his theory, he is clearly alleging misconduct by men, not by a diety. (talk) 19:01 +I have replied at WP:WQA. +":Thanks for taking alright. I just want to follow policy. But, perhaps you could help me fix this article? It needs to be more out-of-universe and the grammar needs to be fixed. Cheers! ♣♣ " +Sir good evening.i want to say something about an article on Wikipedia. Article name Battle of chamkaur sir there are many sources of the battle of chamkaur in which information is different and authentic.The current article had issues i have sources to tell you that the information you had posted is not so correct .please edit it please me i will put forth 4-5 sources for the authenticity of the battle of chamkaur. Thankyou +I see thatI am no longer blocked If this is the case, I DEMAND an apology from the wikipedia leadership for slandering my person. +You have not replied. +Double Standards & Issues - Dear “Lessheard vanU” and to Wikipedia including all editors and administrators & Mr. Wales: This is a very serious issue. We contributing writers have attempted to follow wikipedia written polices in contributing and adding to an existing article or creating one. Yet there are double standards beings upheld by wikipedia’s own editors and administrators. As with Blackpearl14, who clearly believes that wikipedias polices don’t apply to her, and with other editors who uphold double standards. Then when challenged to the double standards, including Blackpearl14's violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and reckless authoritarian rule and control, other wikipedia editors and administrators then support each other when one of them continues to violate wikipedia’s own written polices. “Lessheard vanU” had then wrongly and deliberately calls the contributing people who writes back and flags the issue at hand a “harassing the editor”, outright agreeing with Blackpearl14. Then in addition to IP address being blocked, all “talk & discussion” are deleted leaving only one sided bias and reckless claims against the contributing writers. Even though wrongly deleted by wikipedia editors & administrators, all of this has been recorded, including that Blackpearl14 having repeatedly writing in both correspondence and her bio page (copies have been secure) that the articles belong to her and they will continue to be own and controlled by her. These statements alone proves that she is in violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and purpose. Yet you have ignored that. As previously written in discussion, per wikipedia’s own written polices, but immediately deleted by Blackpearl14 and then sanctioned by “Lessheard vanU”, Blackpearll4 - calls herself evidently Mrs. Johnny Depp and Pirate lord-ess and such. She celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean for wikipedia. Why would someone devote so much time to 24/7 check the site and on these pages, and then recklessly calls anyone who doesn’t follow her bias views vandals, attackers and such. Has her judgement become impaired? Her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean is very clear. That is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedia’s own written polices. Sorry, but if one purchases products, such as Pirates of the Caribbean posters, toys and Walt Disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia / wikinews articles, doesn’t make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest. As recorded, Blackpearl14's pages regarding this issue are one sided, not neutral, are bias, in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean. Yes, Pirates of the Caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral, they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the Walt Disney Company. Following wikipedia’s own written “neutral” policy, entire articles would have to be deleted. Yet Blackpearl14 continues to violate Wikipedia polices and purpose. Then with IP’s being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things, if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to Pirates of the Caribbean following wikipedia’s own written polices, editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason, to delete those articles and ban the IP user. They use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts. It’s a total lock out by the editors and administrators, abusing their trust tools, acting like a private monarchy. To date, Blackpearl14's has proven she has ultimate control, has repeatedly stated that is her purpose, and had even sought to have the articles locked. Then you “Lessheard vanU” wrote that you don’t want to lock these articles, stating it goes against company policy, but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as “vandals” and “harassing the editors” etc... Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and “Chris Mann”. We have documented that they say one thing, yet practice another. We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers. We contributing writers also wonder +Just chipping in here: is an RfC which instructs people to read 24 previous discussions actually going to attract any new and useful participants to the discussion? I wonder how many people will actually read all those 24. Might it be better to try to summarise the previous discussions? +" Language in Saskatchewan Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that the 1988 Mercure decision held that Article 110 of the North West Territories Act determined that Saskatchewan was bilingual. In a context in which jurisdiction over language rights not specified by the Charter is undetermined, this means a conflict between Bill 2 and the North West Territories Act exists. From the CanLII website: ""Article 110 embodies procedural rules that give rights to individuals and, in fact, those rules are to some extent framed in terms of rights. They are language rights or language guarantees as all the cases in this Court from Jones to Société des Acadiens make clear. Section 110 was not entrenched after the Saskatchewan Act was passed. This, like the continuation of s. 110, is entirely in accord with the legislative history of these provisions. Many of the questions raised about the reach of the protections like those accorded under s. 110 have already been determined in recent cases before this Court either under s. 133 of the Constitution Act, 1867, s. 23 of the Manitoba Act, 1870, or ss. 16-18 of the Charter. All of these provisions are differently drafted but they use similar expressions and there has been a marked tendency to give them a similar interpretation. Section 110 was obviously modelled on s. 133. The language rights accorded by s. 110 are substantially the same as those accorded under these other provisions: R. v. Mercure, 1988 IIJCan 107 (C.S.C.), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 234; Paquette v. A.G. Canada and A.G. Alberta, 1990 CanLII 37 (S.C.C.), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1103."" Given all this, what can we say with authority about what the official language(s) in SK is (are)? I'm not a lawyer, but I'm concerned that the article accurately reflect the legal reality. " +" I can add it, but it wasn't there before.  → " +" Thank you! Dear Mr. Petiatil, Thank so much for the wonderful welcome note. That was very nice and considerate of you. I really appretiate it. Unfortunately, I am having a lot of trouble with some WikiUsers who are lobbying against be and reverting all my edits, comments, posts, or even welcome messages to other users. I will need your support if they do it again. Please keep in touch. Once again, thank you. Also I would like to ask you an honest question; don't you ever notice all the lobbying going on? I mean, I for one have noticed that whenever I write a comment or make a constructive edit, a WikiUser usually adhering to the Bahai faith comes up to me and revert or rebukes everything and anything I write. Please respond on my page, not here, thanks. BTW, I used to be a WikiVandal, did you know that? Well, I've changed now, but there's a lot of material out there about me. Go ahead, look me up or ask your fellow WikiAdmins/WikiBosses about me...I'm sure they'll have a lot to say ;) - Yahya Al-Shiddazi (""Retired"" WikiVandal)" +"""Conflicts of interest - Administrators must not block users with whom they are engaged in a content dispute; instead, they should report the problem to other administrators. Administrators should also be aware of potential conflicts of interest involving pages or subject areas with which they are involved.""70.73.141.146 " +" Then the photo from the water, with the buildings tilting inward at 15% rates should be used for sure. That is much more representative of what the area around Battery Park really looks like too. talk→   " +Musiclover query The musiclover account has nothing to do with me. Also, regarding your query about alternate accounts, there was nothing sinister involved - I created it a while ago to mainly focus on football edits but have not used it in months. Could you stop spamming my talkpage and instead help to improve the articles. Cheers. +A sound new policy? An island cannot be a nation/culture/state in itself, nor inherently owned by anyone. I'm afraid it is simply fascistic to claim land in this way - let alone abuse powers to enforce it. When another nation covers part of the island (in this case the United Kingdom), it makes it doubly wrong. Wikipedia needs a clear policy to stop nations from claiming a land article, especially when they already have an official article. One each, you greedy scoundrels - one each. If you are really into 'history', organise it like everyone else: Historical 'era' articles simply must be subsets of the official nation article. I cannot stress this enough: Wikipedia should NEVER assert that any nation is a land, however long a nation has been associated with it. Read the papers - read about Europe. Read about the blood shed - read about the world. We simply cannot let this be done. But has anyone got the guts to address 'policy', I wonder? Wikipedia uber alles? I don't think so. Wikimedia ironically owns nothing but its ventures, and this inherently right-wing 'anarchy Wikipedia' is destined to ultimately fall. If it has sense (and value), it will adapt and change instead. I'd be obliged if people leave my talk page in peace now. I'm switching off my email too - it was only open for another issue. PS (last one). Of course the word 'country' can mean 'countryside' in an emotive sense - but that cannot be a definition regarding groups of people on Wikipedia. The Wikipedia 'top list' should be List of countries: Sovereign states/Nations/Tribes. Country should always be used as the disambiguator. No-one gets pushed out of the whole structure then (as they do now), and they are all admitted to be 'country'-connected in some way - but is doesn't include any land masses! Footnotes can be made for cases if needed - it simply won't be messier than it is now, far from it. People need to take up the mantle on all of this. There are many people on Wikipedia trying to engineer the 'identity mess' on Wikipedia to support their nationalistic views. At its most negative, this is often a 'comparative' matter for them - so they often go after other cases/causes more than directly push their own. The two Irelands and the very specific 'constituent countries' of the United Kingdom are always on their radar, and this crazy disruption over the Irelands now has made them stronger, without doubt. A quick glance at my 700 page watchlist confims that. Logical consistency leads to stability, anarchy like we have now leads to disruption +" Yes, many such sources exist. But a children's book that doesn't mention inverter, and uses other substardard terminology like putting gates ""in series"" is pretty unusual. The Quantum Computing book is talk about something that is not an inverter, because it's a quantum gate, not a logic gate (read the description); so we don't really care what they call it. The rest mention both terms. I pointed out a book or two with discussions of logic gates that only use inverter. Are there any that only use NOT gate, besides the children's book? This search and this should clarify what is more commonly called what. " +" Talk back t101 ) " +Cocksucker BILLCJ YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKFACE BECAUSE YOU LIKE MESSING WITH FUCKING EDITS AND FINALLY EVERYONE FUCKING HATES YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE A COMPLETE RACIST TO EVERYONE!!!! I WISH YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP AROUND PEOPLE AND FINALLY YOUR MOM IS A FUCKING DIRTY SLUTTY BITCH!!!! Weeeelllll! BillCJ's mom's a bitch, she's a big fat bitch, She's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a stupid bitch, if there ever was a bitch, She's a bitch to all the boys and girls. On Monday she's a slut On Tuesday she's a racist On Wednesday thru Saturday she's a bitch Then on Sunday just to be different, Shes u super king kamehameha bitch Have you ever met my friend BillCJ's Mom, She's the fuckiest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a fuckin old bitch, she has fucking fat tits, She's a bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch Bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch She's a fuckin bitch, BILLCJ's Mom's a bitch, And she's such a racist bitch. Talk to kids around the world, It might go a little something like this... [Sung in three different languages by other children] Have you ever met my friend BILLCJ's Mom, She's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a mean old bitch, she has stupid hair, She's a bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch Bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch. She's a stupid bitch, BILLCJ's Mom's a bitch, And she's such a dirty bitch; I really mean it, BILLCJ's Mom, she's a big fat, fucking bitch Big old fat fuckin' bitch, BILLCJ's Mommmmmmmmmmm Yeahhhhh, Chaaaaa Cocksucker BILLCJ YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKFACE BECAUSE YOU LIKE MESSING WITH FUCKING EDITS AND FINALLY EVERYONE FUCKING HATES YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE A COMPLETE RACIST TO EVERYONE!!!! I WISH YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP AROUND PEOPLE AND FINALLY YOUR MOM IS A FUCKING DIRTY SLUTTY BITCH!!!! Weeeelllll! BillCJ's mom's a bitch, she's a big fat bitch, She's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a stupid bitch, if there ever was a bitch, She's a bitch to all the boys and girls. On Monday she's a slut On Tuesday she's a racist On Wednesday thru Saturday she's a bitch Then on Sunday just to be different, Shes u super king kamehameha bitch Have you ever met my friend BillCJ's Mom, She's the fuckiest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a fuckin old bitch, she has fucking fat tits, She's a bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch Bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch She's a fuckin bitch, BILLCJ's Mom's a bitch, And she's such a racist bitch. Talk to kids around the world, It might go a little something like this... [Sung in three different languages by other children] Have you ever met my friend BILLCJ's Mom, She's the biggest bitch in the whole wide world, She's a mean old bitch, she has stupid hair, She's a bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch Bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch. She's a stupid bitch, BILLCJ's Mom's a bitch, And she's such a dirty bitch; I really mean it, BILLCJ's Mom, she's a big fat, fucking bitch Big old fat fuckin' bitch, BILLCJ's Mommmmmmmmmmm Yeahhhhh, Chaaaaa +Q Writ, if you're ever around, maybe you can have a look at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_118#Proposal_to_auto-transclude_.2Fdoc_subpages and close it. I see a clear consensus in support but, as you may recall, I am perfectly ignorant of the underlying technicalities. Thanks, +Sorry Hello, I am awfully sorry for my past messages. I want you to know that I blame a man named Ghlennys for everything. I do not want to eat a hamster, and absolutely not without ketchup! Please disregard my last message considering the hamster. +Sorry about being a bother again, but what should we do about the Snuffy article? The user hasn't touched it since you told them of your concerns, and they haven't logged in in over a week... +Thank you very much, I can use it. It gives much better information on visitings, which is important for instance following a significant change of an article. Thanks for your cooperation. +Please see WP:DATE#Dates containing a month and a day. Wikipedia has a manual of style and whenever month and day are used in articles they are to be linked normally. Not sure why Wikipedia went with using the links to allow date preferences to work, but they did, so we're stuck with it. Sorry. +REDIRECT Talk:The Big Tree of Bunlahy +Be wise, at this point you can crawfish without the loosing of your countenances. Don't be childish and stop edit war. +" Canada? ""Preppy"" is an almost ubiquitous thing in Canada, too. Someone has to expand on it in this context (i.e Upper Canada College, St. Michael's or any of the Toronto or Montreal anglo private boys' schools) and small universities like Bishop's or St. Francis Xavier." +" It is nice that you follow the rules that Wikipedia uses, you should link your sources before you start vandalizing by changing them without them.iNix " +"I advise you change your name, we don't allow names with ""wikipedia"" in it, see WP:USERNAME. (Honk, contribs, odometer) " +" Me again, perhaps for the last time I am fucking furious about Tony1's block earlier today, and the admin cabal's refusal to face up to its dishonesty. I'm also furiuous that I've been threatened and bullied by admin-kiddies since then because I supported Tony and spoke out against his block. What is the fucking point in this project? Is it just to give kiddie's something to write on their school applications? ""I am an administrator on wikipedia""? " +" Removed genetics attack subsection I removed the entire following attack subsection from the ""Genetics"" section: ===Clarification=== It is clear from the graphs contained in the 2012 Turkish Cat Genetics Study that the majority of the Turkish Angora samples submitted show only minor traces of the original Ankara Zoo cats. Ankara Zoo sample No 9575 shows a 72.14% signature mistakenly referred to as the Cyprus group since it is also common to many Cyprus cats—whereas the Turkish Angoras of the cat fancy show a generally insignificant but widely variable percentage this critical identifying signature. Other examples from Turkey that show these signatures are 13558, 76.77%, and 9702, 97.02%. Supposed samples from Turkey that matched the cat fancy Angoras cannot be verified or confirmed. In fact, the supposed authors of those samples deny any knowledge of them. Considering that these ""scientific studies"" from the genetics laboratory of Leslie Lyons of UC Davis assume that American Turkish Angoras are the authentic Turkish Angoras, as her website says, then cats that differ from those samples are not Turkish Angoras. This is highly flawed and misleading pseudo-science, which breeders may consider genetic proof. Please note that the 2012 Turkish Cat Genetics Study was neither published nor is available on a webpage but consists only of an e-mail with attached graphs sent to interested Turkish cat breeders. Further details and citations may be obtainable at.- http://www.turkishangoracat.org/arastirma.aspx?arastirmaId=1 If anything like this, scrubbed of attack language, is reinserted, it needs reliable sources. If material in the extant ""Genetics"" section is disputed, then remove it and hash out the disputes here. — ''''''  Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. " +A warning Hi there, I noticed that you made a revert on the page [[User talk:Rytoruin], this constitutes vandalism. If it happens again I will have to report this to an administrator who will take the appropriate action against you. Regards, +framing and which sources giving +History Didn't VF-84 fly the S model of the Phantom as well?...Only B,J, and N are listed in the history paragraph. +I concur with Bilcat. +Latest issue of Surrey Hants Star (Thurs 11 May 2006), the local newspaper for Aldershot, has a letter describing how bad Aldershot is, people fear to go out on the streets, abusive yobs etc etc. What eveyone who either knows or lives in Aldershot knows to be the truth. What was here was a fair and accurate description of Aldershot, that is until the page was vandalised by Waterspoon who decided to strip out everything he did not like. It is people like Wankerspoon who are giving Wikipedia a bad name. He should be blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia. +", 2 December 2015 (UTC) Which ""study""? Link please. 16:44" +" For heaven's sake - we prefer academic evidence, not personal websites and Youtube. Thatgoes for all ""sides"". A source is reliable because it is written by someine with appropriate qualiifications and expertise. That's all. There are millions of websites out there written by people who haven't a clue. " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Vaja Abrams. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (Talk) +really am, but as written earlier I simply cannot prove it to the satisfaction of all users. I appreciate your response either way. I hope we can work together on an article in the future, if I am unblocked. It's worth noting for the ages that (as written on the SPI page) I'm not the one who was accused of using the proxy; the other guy apparently did that. Thank you again, Infect me I +" Hi, thank you for taking the matter seriously, your efforts are much appreciated. While the sources don't actually say they're the children of David Cross, I'm happy to assume good faith on the matter, though it'd be nice if there was a source somewhere that said he did have 3 children, I'll have a look see if I can dig anything up. Better not go into any more detail, though, or it'll read like one of those ""what my family did this year"" circulars that people send round at Christmas -) cheers, " +Does that actually work? Let's see: Ah - I had started using these when that wasn't there. I'd have to remember when the GMT day switches over though - but I guess those few hours don't really matter anyway. (talk - ) +Recent changes Please be careful with your removals and additions, thank you... +nixie, part 2 You banned me after you warned me because I was making to much sense to your lover. You are very unfair. +Borders Hi Sharon. I have a question for your in your role as Master (Mistress?) of Userpage design. How do I add a flat (not grooved) border around a page? Thanks thehtmlchallenged +Yolo swag troll lol +oh I forgot to say good job on becoming a admin i saw you became on on the 28th niceRBI does not work unblocking my account will fix it or i can do this forever i have unlimited IPs ) 216.6.232.235 +The foundation that runs and accepts donations for the online encyclopedia Wikipedia neglected to do a basic background check before hiring a chief operating officer who had been convicted of theft, drunken driving and fleeing a car accident. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071222/wikipedia_coo_071222/20071222?hub=SciTech Well, now I get it. If one can't be a success anywhere else or even if one can't get a job anywhere else, one can at least edit pages on Wikipedia and/or be their Chief Operating Officer. I wonder how much money this scam site stole from people over the years? 99.248.67.42 +12:13, 4 May 2012‎ User:217.217.197.24 +" She does not speak any Pashto, only Persian. However, she is actually of Pashtun origin, of the Noorzai tribe. Which is why she has support from the Pashtun ethno-fascist organizations such as Afghan Mellat. She is a tool used by them to negatively portray the Northern groups inorder to reduce their power and make sure that Pashtuns, either through Taliban or former Communists take all power. This is not known by the Western media ofcoarse since they are just not aware of these details and the Afghan Mellatis have done a good job of promoting her. Ironcally, she is supposed to be a ""champion of women's rights"", yet she has not done anything for women rights other than use it to try her best to make the northern groups look bad while women are abused in every minute of their lives under Taliban control... she ofcoarse ignores this since the Taliban are Pashtuns. Well that's enough for now. I'll get into these details later. " +It didn't need a history merge, just a regular merge, so I was able to get it done. +" Please stop adding the year of a video game's release to the fist sentence to each article. This information is needless in the first sentence and it is already stated later within the lead paragraph. There are not any good or featured-level articles that use this convention and it does not dramatically enhance the article. Please refer to Wikipedia Policies WP:LEAD and WP:BEGIN if you have any questions. Thank you.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  " +" Even though that picture includes more characters, I still think Charlie is a way bigger part of all the novels than all of those characters combined and therefore his picture is more important. I also still think that the three ""evil"" vampires are pretty important since they are the enemies throughout the entire series, so something like this (although perhaps a different specific image, but that idea) would work well. " +Hi Abhishek, I started using the cite template in earnest ) I was a tad lazy to do it, but now I promise to do it with all my contributions henceforth, Thanks Randhir +Another remark to Paul111, for someone who has been accusing others of POV's and unsourced arguments, your recent edits have given us remarkably few new high quality references and undeniable arguments, for future edits a more modest tone may prevent overreaction all around. +" (replied). ~TalkContribs - " +Okay, I've found another image - the one that shows the plaintiff pleading with the defendant? It was from the programme. And probably the worst image from the programme. Might be easier to restart. talk +" ""Otherkin"" are not qualified to diagnose their mental state as they are typically not mental health professionals. " +Bugger me backwards. +" J.G. Quintel I still don't think he's individually notable yet. I looked all over and found absolutely no BLP info on him. Shame, since Regular Show is the best thing I've seen on Cartoon Network in ages. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) " +United Kingdom | class=Start | importance=Low}} {{WikiProject +National Parks of Canada Please be aware of this. Thanks, +" You said yourself there was no consensus. I said there was and I was correct. And the other person ""blew me out of the water""? I can dig up hundreds of sources of information that refer to African-Americans as ""Negroes"" or worse and the mentally challenged as ""idiots, imbeciles, morons"". The fact that a term has been used popularly in the past does not make it acceptable or scientific today. You will not find a source that states the ISR was a provisional government because the term is new and part of the evolving science of diplomacy and peace studies. Professor Clarence Timithy " +Yes, I'm well aware. No, no one can blame you. Mail crossed your post. Will give it more thought. - talk +" March 2006 (UTC) Actually, I gave two, both of which are encyclopedias. Your source says ""persian-born"". Heja Helwada provided sources that there were a large number of Arabs in Khwarizm. You gave me no sources from Columbia encyclopedia, also, you provided no sources to prove that the alleged poem was written by the Arab scientist al-Biruni. Encyclopedia Iranica states that there were huge immigrations by Arabs to the region, proving that not everyone from Khwarizm was Persian. Please stop disregarding tangible evidence. 20:08, 2" +" You're a fucking moron Please kill yourself. You are a cancerous moron devoid of all intelligence and have no business editing Wikipedia or having any privileges thereof. I demand that you restore my userpages in full, removing any copyright infringement contained within. Mate1 " +Thanks for saying so! Would that it were done; I'm sure there's a long way to go. But I appreciate the encouragement. +", 31 October 2011 (UTC) Are you fucking stupid? Do you have brain damage? I just clearly told why you have no fucking right to demand civility from people. You can't actually argue against this which is why you robotically recite some bullshit Wikipedia guidelines that went out the window the second the site decided to feature The Human Centipede on its front page. What kind of a fucking moron thinks it's ok to attack, insult and harass people as long as no bad words are used? What kind of a supreme retard crybaby then brings down the banhammer when the target has the gall to fight back? And you're even talking about ""damaging the community."" Gee, I wonder how having The Human Centipede as a featured article might damage the community. I'm sure absolutely nobody will be offended by being forcibly subjected to this perfectly wholesome movie. I've already removed Wikipedia from my bookmarks bar because clearly there's no telling what kind of shit I'll have to see when I view the front page. This is no longer an encyclopedia, this is 4chan pretending to be an encyclopedia. 09:18" +Greater Jakarta Yes Bandung is not part of Greater Jakarta but adjacent, though Bandung is growing so fast its close to Jakarta. Cianjur is strangely added to Jabodetabek even tho its past the mountain but I didnt add it, Indo government did, SBY wanted Sukabumi included. Its not a listing of the conurbation (built-up area), rather a listing of definitions. Too bad governments define things like that +Some tension appeared - mediation is needed Some attack against category Red Army crimes appeared. Discussion is too nervous - article not discussed but deleting procedure started immediately. Some people threaten me starting deleting attack against all my articles. Thanks. +Alexander Barrie Hi there, apologies. If I were to remove the false information from the entry, would the post be valid as it is both true knowledge and also not self-promotion. Cheers, +anyway references like those do not suit the article. +Thanks Tinkstar1985, great help. +Hello Tryptofish! I am soap-cooker! +" ACTA Deletion I have left a comment on the article's deletion page. I have to look at the page objectively and with strict reference to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please do have a read of these guidelines. Notability and referencing are indeed an issue and the discussion about deletion is, in my view, perfectly justifiable. While ACTA is a vocal group, with a significant amount of opposition, it is also a very small group. Please do try to remain objective. '''''' (talk) " +''LOGIC IS MY LIGHT, and as long as Science has usurper's of Logic, we cannot expect much progress for humans, nor our minds. Because, the real/pure logic is mostly wrong...! Be it Evolution, Atheism, or the Bible.( ) +" Oppose. per all those opposing above. Perhaps those in favour in renaming might explain why a ""Sugababes song"" should be divorced from the words ""Sugababes?"" Cheers " +Very belated reply on my userpage. +Review by Dominique Vidal in Le Monde Diplomatique +RFA Thanks Thanks for your participation at my recent Request for adminship. I’ll keep your concerns in mind as I continue to work within the project. I hope you find I live up to your expectations of administrators. Best, +WHAT THE HELL!! STUPID ROBOTS, I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING 67.163.17.113 +Yeah, I was trying to be careful not to remove the space in any Battle Network references. Did I screw up? My apologies. - 06:35, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC) +You think its out of context not others. What you think you own wiki ? Dream on.... +So you want to block me I really don't care if you are going to block me or not. If you are going to block me, I request that you delete my user page. Thank you in advance. +2008 Image Added the 2008 top image. Looks cool, doesn't it! ~Jess~216.46.98.249 +, not the flag of the revolt which had inverted green and white bars +Hey Dude We are both unblocked (the 48 hour block is over) and I would like you to come back please. Thanks. - (VT) +(I'm sorry for the bad aranging, it's my 1st article... and I don't know much about editing it, but I'm learning... +I already am banned! So what ya gonna do now ASSHOLE? 8-)) +" You know MBK004 and Postoak, do you think I really care if you block my account? No I don't. I have access to more than one computers and I have more than one emails. So to scare me by saying that you can block me doesn't work. I can't believe I even wasted my time here arguing with the two of you geeks. MBK004 maybe when you wrote ""I am a college student who is thought by many to have no life at all"" on your profile, it is true after all. When people ask what you do for a living and your response is ""Oh I'm a sycop. I edit wikipedia pages."" Is that even a real job? I won't be proud putting that job title on my resumé. Also the car that you currently owned suits your profile better than the Aston Martin V8 Vantage. Your centuries-old 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora fits for a geek like you. Sitting on your arse all day editing pages would give you a beer belly and no way you would look good in an Aston Martin. Promise. And Postoak you did delete the talk page before you put it in archive folder. I also know you have a sockpuppet account of User:RJN. My advice for you two is: get a real job and stop being a hypocrite." +Thanks for replying. I will accept your comments about Bill Dowel as being factual on face value although I am not entirely convinced. This should, however, have been explained in your edit summary. And you really can't edit Wikipedia articles at the request of other people, especially anyone associated with the person or organisation articles are about. Please keep this in mind in future in order to avoid potential problems. And if you have already been editing as Anglicanwiki, as seems the case, then you also need to be aware of the WP:SOCK policies. Cheers, +I made a contribution to the current article a long time ago. I had not looked at it since then. I agree with you, and look forward to your article. Perhaps you may consider creating an article on General Smuts, to put the content you might find relevant for it. +Re your recent advice Thank you for explaining things. Problem now i think was that someone had already used username Tepi on Commons, so I had to use another and now can't unify accounts. Would it actually be possible to usurp the username lesion on en WP especially since there is one edit from that user in 2009 ? Thanks. +" Smash Lab The comments that you arbitrarily deleted on the [Smash Lab] article was not ""personal bias"" as you contend - ask around! It's a legitimate criticism and just because you don't agree with it, doesn't mean it's not valid, jag-off!" +How can I appeal a block when I can't edit others' talk pages? +" hmm, yes, as I said: I also ""watch"" the Emily Ruete-article (as I wrote most of it), and I did notice it got vandalized, too... Anyway, in the sandbox you can experiment all you want...beeing bold ..or you can beup in the sky or colorful. In short: play around..;-) If you create a username you can do the same on you user-page. Good luck, regards, " +Dawn Wells Please have a look. +you are a slurgnog, dumbdip piece of mush foggart! +Ok but can u at leas block User: Gibraltarian who is permanently banned and is now continuing to vandalise a number of pages with IP address 195.244.194.29 . I think even User: Gibnews (whith whom I often argue) will agree to this. Cheers! +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . My mistake, and my apologies. What you wrote was so POV that I didn't pay as much attention to the references as perhaps I should. They did get restored, right? And it's not an issue of stupidity, it's an issue of consensus. Several other editors of the article found your wording POV. Please note that most if not all of us agreed with your basic premise; we disagreed only with the way you wrote it. As others have pointed out to me plenty of times, no one owns a Wikipedia article, and repeatedly pushing a view even in the face of discussion that suggests that you tone it down generally rubs people the wrong way. +No more putting the paragraph about some guy thinking their son is autistic. That's for gossip blogs, not for wikipedia. When there is a credible source that says he is autistic, when there is any genuine news about it, we can put that there, but not gossip. +Well, I think we agree to disagree; this article is not easy to follow given the volume of text. I'm aware of only one discussion prior to ours; where are the others? As well, objections were noted previously: the article has grown significantly in size and is now unwieldy almost to the point of lacking utility. I am also not proposing headings for all ranks: only the flag and officer ranks (which are lengthy sections on their own). Lastly, any user can collapse the TOC on their screen. As for the wikifying of real-world terms: the article does not at all link to the articles/concepts of rank and insignia that are described in the title and only weakly described after that. That is bad form and should be upfront, not at the end. I acknowledge and appreciate your contributions to the article, but resistance to changing it and your reversion can be perceived as exerting ownership over it. To that end, I think it prudent to initiate a new discussion or RfC regarding these issues to enhance the article, and we should be guided by the results of that. Thanks! +Why are you such a homo? Cum guzzler. Why do you insist on being a cum guzzler? +I assume you are referring to the papers you uploaded to your userspace and got deleted. +Edit by Rizzrack - Will be updated in next few days, since i'm working a lot at the moment. +I'm blocked for this proposal. Can we investigate truths? Is mankind able to examine reality? We can't simply believe things which we feel pity for. Never mind, i lost hope for Wikipedia. +Hi Months and months ago you were extremely rude to me. I do not forget incivility. I want to end this, but will not be able to until you apologise for what you have done. 86.40.101.53 (Removing this as vandalism is just asking for trouble) +Ok. Re-read my second sentence. Derex +No, I have a large supply of popcorn. Argue away:-) +Your a FUCKING Jew All Jews do is wine wine wine All they want is money and power they hide there fucking jew gold and act poor so they can get more money for the pussies who feel bad for poor people +Cell (film) Why is it such a horrible thing for me to create a page for the film? I've seen pages for other movies that are currently in production. H-E doulbe hocky sticks, I've seen pages for movies that aren't even in production yet. Can I get some answers, and don't just tell me to read some other WP:BOLOGNA. +". — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I see it's already been deleted" +"] When I'm angry, I can't write from the NPOV. I've let articles I care deeply about languish for over a week at a time, until I could calm down enough to conform to wikipolicy. The more important the issue, and the more ""right"" I am, the fiercer my anger. Some issues require Olympian detachment to describe properly. My hat's off to anyone who can do it. (And where's Larry when you need him? ) " +REDIRECT Talk:Yusuf Ali Kenadid +graham broad is a total loser. yes website woooo gay +" Why did you alter my message? And you're calling me an arrogant, ignorant ass? Look at yourself. I wrote that it's A PROGRESS, not IT'S IS A PROGRESS or what ever you altered it to. And even if it's your native language it doesn't necessarily mean that you use it better than nonnative English speakers. I still see errors in your message. At least use I and not ""i"". And again, what is the point of unnecessarily adding ""Cum, leave""? And you're seriously just trying to argue about it, doubting MY own understanding of Hebrew and the circumstances of the title. Again, once again, I'm telling you the reasons. In Hebrew, ""Ligmor"" (that's the gerund. ""Gomrot"" is a feminine present (progressive or simple) form) means either ""To finish"" or ""To cum"". ""Cum"" is obviously some sort of a slang word, but that's what Cum and Gomrot is. A word and its meaning. Because the show is about sex, their intentions for the tile are obvious. If you insistingly want that, I can put both ""Finish, Leave"" and ""Cum, Leave"" to show its ""double meaning"". " +"Not notable as an article in itself because the vehicle had already existed a long time before its most recent ""inventor"" gave it this name. See eg Horse powered car c 1983: http://youtube.com/watch?v=jyYUPv0rx0I also " +" User:Idolusa == Could you please verify whether or not this is also your account? (T · C) ==" +I LIKE TO ATTACK F*ING ALIENS WHEN THEY ARE SLEEPING< WHEN THEY ARE NOT AWAKE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE F*ING NIfht +Nah, I never really noticed any issues like that growing up in northern Lancaster County. Most people just accept it as a way of life, and when I was young I thought there were Amish everywhere not just primarily in Lancaster County. I'm sure there are some youths that have yelled nasty things and I can recall a couple times where the newspaper's police log mentioned vandalism or verbal abuse; but by-and-large it's not at-all a common occurrence. Oh, apart from when the Amish teenagers are playing with the electronics in the supermarket... I'll admit even I smirk at that, but people are usually respectful enough to keep their chuckling to themselves. All of the Amish I know are understanding that they lead a very different way of life and simply ignore any insults thrown their way. As they tell me, the major concern between them and the outside world consists of two things: rising costs of living and road safety. To them, public image is irrelevant. +Old Forge-Taylor Football Rivalry None of the arguements for deletion of this page were valid. I researched every score from every year personally and created this page for the thousands of people that ever witnessed or played in these games. It is very difficult to research this information as all of the Scranton Times archives are on micro-film. I did this as a benefit to all those interested, and there are many. What harm did this page do? +" TIBIN VARGHESE (CREATED BY) Hypertension Hypertension Hypertension is a disorder characterized by consistently high blood pressure. Generally, high blood pressure consists of systolic blood pressure (the ""top"" number, which represents the pressure generated when the heart beats) higher than 140, or diastolic blood pressure (the ""bottom"" number, which represents the pressure in the vessels when the heart is at rest) over 90. Effect on the Eyes High blood pressure can injure the eyes, causing a condition called retinopathy Hypertensive retinopathy Damage to the retina from high blood pressure is called hypertensive retinopathy. It occurs as the existing high blood pressure changes the microvasculature of the retina. Some of the first findings in the disease are flame hemorrhages and cotton wool spots. As hypertensive retinopathy progresses, hard exudates can appear around the macula along with swelling of the macula and the optic nerve, causing impairment of vision. In severe cases permanent damage to the optic nerve or macula can occur. Bone Loss Hypertension also increases the elimination of calcium in urine, potentially leading to loss of bone mineral density, a significant risk factor for fractures, particularly in elderly women. In one study, women with the highest levels of blood pressure lost bone density at nearly twice the rate of those in the lowest range. It is not clear whether this effect occurs in men or in non-Caucasian women. Sexual Dysfunction Sexual dysfunction is more common and more severe in men with hypertension and in smokers than it is in the general population. Many of the drugs that treat hypertension are thought to cause impotence as a side effect. In these cases, it is reversible when the drugs are stopped. More recent evidence suggests, however, that the disease process that causes hypertension is itself the major cause of erectile dysfunction in these men. Newer anti-hypertensive drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), are less associated with erectile dysfunction. ARBs, such as losartan (Cozaar), may be particularly effective in restoring erectile function in men with high blood pressure. Sildenafil (Viagra) is successful in achieving erections in almost two-thirds of patients with controlled high blood pressure. Because sildenafil has a shorter half-life and is eliminated more quickly from the body than newer erectile dysfunction drugs, it may be a safer option for men with hypertension. In a 2003 review of safety data, sildenafil did not appear to pose a risk for men who had both high blood pressure and erectile dysfunction. Pregnancy and Preeclampsia Severe, sudden high blood pressure in pregnant women is one component of a condition called preeclampsia (commonly called toxemia) that can be very serious for both mother and child. Preeclampsia occurs in up to 10% of all pregnancies, usually in the third trimester of a first pregnancy, and resolves immediately after delivery. Other symptoms and signs of preeclampsia include protein in the urine, severe headaches, and swollen ankles. This condition may be caused by a failure of the placenta to embed properly in the uterus, which causes it to misconnect with the mother's blood vessels. As a result, the fetus does not receive a sufficient blood supply, and the mother's own blood pressure increases to replace it. The reduced supply of blood to the placenta can cause low birth weight and eye or brain damage in the fetus. Severe cases of preeclampsia can cause kidney damage, convulsion, and coma in the mother and can be lethal to both mother and child. Women at risk for preeclampsia (particularly those with existing hypertension) may benefit from having an ultrasound of uterine arteries at 20 to 24 weeks of pregnancy, followed (if abnormal) by 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. Uterine Fibroids High blood pressure may increase the risk of developing fibroids, according to data from the Nurses’ Health Study. Tracking women for 10 years, the prospective epidemiologic study found that for every 10 mm/Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure, the risk for developing fibroids increased by 8 - 10%. Outlook for Children with Hypertension Children with high blood pressure should first be treated with lifestyle changes, including weight reduction, increased physical activity, and diet modification. If blood pressure is not controlled with lifestyle changes, drug treatment may be required. Although there are few clinical trials conducted in children, a 2005 study found that the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan was safe and effective in children. Results of studies evaluating outcomes of children with hypertension suggest that early abnormalities, including enlarged heart and abnor +" Fair use images and original article I don't understand this neurotic compulsion that people seem to have to scrap all of my contributions to this article. The third paragraph that was previously removed, and which I have now reinstated, contains relevant description for this article. Similar descriptions appear in other porn-related articles on wikipedia. As for the pictures, the lead image is a promotional photo head shot and it is a much better representation of the subject than an amateur fan pic. The ""Helles Belles"" image illustrates relevant text in the article. In fact, fair use rationales and appropriate licensing tags have been provided for both of these images. I don't understand what the problem is since both images are regularly used for promotional purposes by the copyright holder to market Laura Angel and products related to her. Thus, the appearance of these same images on wikipedia is altogether fair and appropriate as an accurate visual representation of the subject. Also, both of the images I have added to this article are much more characteristic of Laura's professional appearance than the Brussels fan pic. If someone wants to expand the article and add the fan pic somewhere alongside further text down below they are free to do so. However, I request that people refrain from taking out perfectly legitimate and accurate contributions that have already been made to this article." +I love to eat black people! +Removed PROD on Alaska Central Express Cargo Flight 22 I have removed the tag from Alaska Central Express Cargo Flight 22, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! This is notable information that should be merged into the Alaska Central Express article, not deleted from WP. +" I attribute Jehochman's behavior to him not paying close enough attention. Yes, in my capacity as an uninvolved admin., I did. And, five minutes later, in that capacity, I deemed your ""liar and hate-monger"" to be block-worthy. " +" VP I had to laugh. - Favorite Cookie " +Clean-up Even though I write most of this, I have to totally admit after reading it from start to finish that this article is a right mess. The references are too web-reliable, there are also too many meaning the reference numbers make it look messy and clog things up, and the references list is far too long for an article of this size. Another thing I see wrong is the lack of flow, the article jumps about a bit from one subject to another in the same paragraph, the idea of a paragraph is to keep to one subject, then if the subject changes, start a new one, looking back at what I've done, I've gone against the basic rules of paragraphing. To be honest, it's as bad as a GCSE English paper entry, Feeder have been going on for 16 years, and deserve a miles better article. I was thinking some of us could all club together and work on this together and make a fresh start? -), we could set up something like a Feeder Wikiproject, and make a group of Feeder fans who are also Wikipedians to give the band the article they deserve, and also work towards a view of getting it to FA status. +A little suggestion This is just a suggestion, but how about this article be merged into Spongebob Squarepants article? what do u think? ( ) +Mill pond powered Grays Ferry? Clark Park is to the west of the Schyukill River. Grays Ferry, according to its Wikipedia entry, is to the east of the river. Therefore, I think the note in this piece about the mill pond powering factories in Grays Ferry must be in error. Can anyone clarify the situation? +"==Regarding your edit to American Revolution on December 18, 2006== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. " +" I cannot communicate any further with you if you must call every little thing I say to you that doesn't sit well with you a ""personal attack"". You're also talking in circles and repeating points that I have already addressed. I maintain the article in its current state is embarassingly amateurishly written and violates Wikipedia policies in more ways than one. You seriously need to cool down yourself, study WP:OR a lot more and try to get some perspective when it comes to articles about bands. The article in its current state reads like something written by young and overzealous fans for some homemade zine or something. " +Andrew Ranger W/D If was officially entered into those ARCA races at Pocono and Chicago, and is officially credited with a W/D from both events, shouldn't his results reflect that? If not, then what id the purpose for the W/D in the key. +Cannot believe this. Sufferin' s*** +Hi Tarc, Good points. How long is your penis? +" The chapter you removed is not the wrong version, because it has nothing to do with edit-war, because edit-war means: reverting to a previous version - without considering the claims of others against that previous version, while the chapter you wrongfully removed - was improved again and again by me - according to your comments about ""irrelevance"" - without reverting to a previous version. Further, The chapter is supported by User:(MOB)DeadMeat, and is also supported by User:Chrishatch1973, and is also supported by User:Eliko; whereas the removal of the chapter is supported by User:Basket of Puppies and is also supported by User:DragonflySixtyseven only; So which option is more consensual? Returning the chapter, or removing it? " +February 2006 (UTC) The Dianetics mediation page has moved to and I, for one, invite your participation. I'm not sure exactly how all things work around here. 02:05, 12 +Hi, I am sorry. I am not familiar with a rule against defining elements in a bulleted list. Perhaps you feel that since the elements have a Wikilink, then you don't have to gloss them. However, some readers print articles, so relying on the Wikilinks won't help these readers. +Dear Arbitrarily0, Do I need to agree text with you before I past it to FxPro's article or shall I post it here and you will add it yourself? Olga 62.152.19.73 +" 12 sided is ""twelve rode rims"" A coin is one plus one sides and rim as rim is the unique of the account of the twelve as twelve sides asks two selectively express the 365 day year division as a twelve month year, for banking and taxes, possibly to eliminate the thirteen month twenty eight day four week even sided mystical door of even flow. as it will be easer to see the thirteen rim coin as a day is missing for the year. so the coin is to remind every good man this is a mystical thing as life is a coin for the watch, spec-tic-ally I the 2 dollar coin as also is implied." +Controversises How is it there isn't a section touching on this based on the tumoultuous times in SF, from the endless laws (both him and the Supervisors) for plastic bags, outlawing bottles, and now pet shops?? Also, the affair, the incidental drug rehab immediately following, and the illegal issuance of gay marriage licenses, which ended up voided? +":::Well, in Jasons defense, the concept of a body-hopping monster that burns out it's hosts is common in sci-fi and fantasy. The writer has admitted to ripping off The Hidden though, so you're not wrong. As for those bloopers, most of them just seem to be the standard continuity errors you see in all movies (people's clothes changing between scenes, etc) rather than major story problems. 730 " +You have also flagged my reversion of your edit as vandalism. I must protest this, as your change adds weasel words. +Promotion? I understand what you are saying about using it on the University page, but wasn't the few sentences on the Student Newspaper page relevant? I don't see how that was promoting anything. +" ==Matt Sanchez response, clarifications and demand for apology from Robertissimo Robertissimo, I beg to differ. The ""couple of mentions on Fox"" were full segments on the O'Reilly Factor, a debate on Hannity and Colmes, a full segment on Fox and Friends, a segment on Neil Cavuto and another segment on ABC News, an op-ed in the New York Post and the Marine Corps Post. I was given the Jeane Kirkpatrick Award principally because I not only defended myself in all these forums, but Iaccording to the award citationupheld a standard of academic freedom in the face of adversity. I take great issue with your claim of my "" admission in that article that he was also an escort"". No such admission was made, i was trying to make a rhetorical comparison between payment for porn as a proxy to a form of prostitution. I made this point on SEVERAL occasions on the Alan Colmes show. I was on Alan's show four times. I take your statement as offensive, cowardly, counter-productive and demand an apology. I understand that wiki contributors are supposed to be much more subtle in their criticism, however Robertissimosomeone, to my knowledge, that I have never methas shown great disdain for me by publicly calling me a liar, prostitute or worsean imprecise writer. If you, Mr Robertissimo hold me in such low regard, why are you interested in contributing to this article? That's a fair question. If Mr Robertissimo refuses to apologize, I'd like some advice on how to handle this matter appropriately. Editors as the faceless Mr Robertissimo should keep in mind that I am a real person and not some ""wiki curiosity"". Robertissimo's comments on the Marine Corps status shows an entire lack of knowledge of these type of procedures, both formal and informal and his assessment is frankly simplistic. These issues have been discussed ad nauseum, but angry activists still believe they can ""hurt me"" through this Wikipedia article. With all due respect to Mr Robertissimo (none of which he has shown me), where did he suddenly come from? Are we heading back toward editing wars as the dishonest and biased attempt to further their agenda? Given the history of this article and the number of, frankly, shady characters who have appeared and disappeared on this page, my concerns are merited. Out of curiosity, why hasn't any emphasis been placed on ""further investigating"" the allegations made against me by U-Haul and the Veterans organization? The Marine Corps Times printed the ""allegations"", but I haven't seen editors on this talk page bringing up that issue. It is disturbing, distracting and tedious to have to ""defend"" myself from the likes of character such as Mr. Robertissimo et al...This page was not meant for that purpose and I would like for civility to return. I fear there has been a further infiltration by former editors who had been resoundingly banned from these pages. Can anyone comment? Writing vs. Edits. I originally cited a comparison between myself and Rich Merritt (who happens to be my neighbor). I was told the Salon reading audience would not recognize the former pornstar alias USMC Captain Merritt . The Salon editor, Mark Schone, inserted Jeff Gannon as Mr Gannon is somewhat of a lightrod for the Salon readership's disdain. I've made this statement before on at least three occasions (please consult the archives). In reality, Merritt's story is entirely dissimilar to my own as Merritt was performing in adult films while on active duty. My last film of record was in the winter of '94, nearly a decade before my enlistment in the Marine Corps. The comparison between myself and Gannon is also passing at best, as Jeff was considered to be a type of interloper/doppleganger with insider knowledge given to him surreptitiously from some shadowy figure/network within the Bush administration or the Republican party. In my case, there was no doubt of my identity as a Marine, my status as a student at Columbia University, the subsequent changes that were effected in the student and city policy regarding the discrimination of veterans and the specific description of those veterans were all real and documented. I also had NO inside help or sway with any party or organization, including (unfortunately) the Columbia Milvets organization. There was never a question that I wrote the articles I wrote, nor was there a hint of some ""higher up"" working behind the scenes to help me. There was also never a doubt that I had merited the CPAC Award. I was unanimously elected according to the event's organizers. I was even congratulated for courage after standing up to the political roasting after unsourced bloggers revealed my past and attempted to link me (rather poorly) with an anti-gay rights agenda. The Gannon allegations of escorting were really just more red meat f +in the first place. Look at the article's history if you don't believe me +Please stop vandalizing my good faith edits Hi sir, I am just trying to make Wikipedia better. Please don't touch my edits without prior authorization on my part.74.58.27.35 +" Ugh. That's wrong. It even says so in Mann et al. (1998); ""A variety of studies have sought to use a ‘multiproxy’ approach to understand long-term climate variations, by analysing a widely distributed set of proxy and instrumental climate indicators1,5–8 to yield insights into longterm global climate variations. Building on such past studies..."" - " +I agree with the above comment. This really needs to be remedied. +" nope not by me just had them so wanted to dispaly some beautiful aspects of bombay! Unfortunately that means that the pictures have a copyright problem. Do you have permission of the author to use these pictures or can you point to the source of the pictures? |YakYak " +Yes. Likewise Der Untergang is by far and away the most historically accurate film ever done about that overall topic, very noteworthy and controversial for being so, yet it's still replete with needless mistakes and yes, all kinds of spin here and there. +" Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2013 On December 13, 2013 St-Pierre officialy announced that he would take some time off from MMA and vacate his belt. He left the door open for a possible return in the future, saying that he ""needed a break"". " +Did you see him repress me? +" I also changed the disclaimer to ""The neutrality and factual accuracy of this article are disputed.""" +. Fucking awesome. I bet you went to fucking kU +It's not clear what you are proposing. All the best:  Farmbrough, . +"I was correcting factual inaccuracies. I more or less rewrote a propaganda piece single-handedly into an acceptable and neutral article. And I have now constructively pointed out massive problems (not just by the way) by an editor who caught my eye at ""Did you Know"" with the very poor ""Nazi talking dog"" story. You clearly were reached to a online pal (who I've discovered writing two error ridden and skewed articles in as many days)-and are now doing their bidding rather than focusing on improving some rather poor content. That is, you have actively harmed your websites mission with your actions. I was pretty sure this would be how it would go done, but fascinating nonetheless. " +" I agree, there is zero evidence of any connection between Qworty and Miss Filipacchi. tlk. cntrb. " +Word length is a better measure of brevity. A lead section should not get bogged down trying to be too descriptive, too prescriptive or critiquing its conventional definition. You could just say: Capitalism generally refers to an economic and social system in which the means of production are predominantly privately-owned and operated for profit. Investment, distribution, income, production, pricing and other economic activity are usually determined by the owners of these means of production according to their own self-interest. Almost all countries in the world have adopted elements of capitalism in their economic systems. +" ""If you revert fewer infoboxes it may happen sooner"" is written in such a way that it suggests I would have to wait longer due to my actions of apparently reverting infoboxes. I work on the guide that ""An infobox is neither required nor prohibited for any article."" Whether to use one or not would be determined through a discussion and possible consensus on the talk page. I make no secret of my dislike of them on biographies, but think they work well on film, science,, geography, history, and royalty articles, etc... To answer your TFA question, I really don't know. We have missed the 90 year anniversary of her death, and have another nine years to wait for the centenary. I will see which date fits best. We may have to go with first performance, or wait two years to place a TFA on the 145th anniversary of her birth. Cheers Talk " +" Explanation of my recent edits Removing bolding and external links within article per WP:MOS. Only first word of section titles should be capitalized, and NCNM should not be placed on section headings (each section is about the subject of the article). Removal of peacock terms and redundant phrasing, ""extensive, unique, geared to, in its course offerings, more universal, opens numerous, in which students are immersed, designed for students with a special affinity, wanting a more streamlined graduate experience, fully"". If actually extensive needs a RS that describes it that way, likewise with unique or a description of how its unique. Geared to unless we are talking about gears this is marketing. In its course offerings is redundant. More universal with an explanation this is unnecessary, however universality is a pretty large if vague claim. Students are immersed, describe how program is immersive provide a RS that says it is notable for that. Designed for students with a special affinity, designed for students is a given for a school and special affinity sounds like peacock for interest in. Wanting a more streamlined graduate experience is marketing peacock speak for shorter/smaller course of study. Fully (accredited) is assumed if only partially accredited that would be spelled out. Removed wikilink on word school to article Medical school NCNM is not a medical school as described in target article. Adding ref improve tag: the entire Academic programs section has only the two refs supporting accreditation, the NCNM clinic section is completely unsourced as is the Accreditations and associations section and the NCNM history section. I placed 3 citation needed tags on some statements that definitely need references. These are very specific in addition to the article in general needing improved references. Additional proposed edits: I think expertise in ""with an expertise in natural medicine"" should be removed if it can't be supported with a reference. Expertise is substantial claim for education and training only. I am not sure what ""a holistic Chinese medicine education in Western medical sciences"" means. ""Since its founding, NCNM has sought to preserve and convey the classical modalities of naturopathy and honor the principles that guide naturopathic care:"" could be rephrased, ""to preserve and convey the classical modalities and honor the guiding principles of naturopathy:"" if that preserves the meaning. ""The college is alma mater to over 2,000 alumni"" is redundant if your an alumni it's your alma mater. - - " +In a similar vein, what about devil facial tumour disease? It's effectively an infectious agent that spreads between Tasmanian Devils; the catch is that it appears to have originated as a mutation from a devil's own cells. +This guy is a damn golbalist. Watch out buddy. We are coming for you! Delete retributionLSR again, I assure you will have issues. +so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' +":You seem to know a lot on this subject!! Have you checked out any of those links? Smith " +" Please stop reverting material that has been challenged. I am posting it here so that we can resolve this without disrupting the article. '''chatspy Challenged content The following material has been challenged by two separate IP editors, and restored by one editor (Altenmann). Having reviewed it, it does not appear to be in an encyclopedic style and requires a rewrite. As such, I've posted it here for discussion and reworking to avoid disruption. The text in dispute is as follows: Pincus offers managerial advice on handling difficulties caused by both types: she defines the know-it-all as the ""Truly Smart Know-It-All"", an employee with ""a intellectual handle on the job requirements that is spectacular"", but who ""doesn't 'see' boundaries"", and the omniscient deity as a person who ""thinks nothing of imposing or intruding"". Lloyd makes no such distinction, although he notes that ironically, Know-It-Alls can sometimes know what they are talking about, and simply have such a brusque style of communication that people are unwilling to listen. He characterizes Know-It-Alls as superficially domineering and controlling, but insecure underneath. The outward focus on the inferiority of their fellows is intended to mask the inner sense of their own weaknesses in knowledge, skills, and competence. Pincus recommends different strategies for each type. For the case of the Truly Smart Know-It-All she observes that a manager might have to bend the rules somewhat to accommodate the negative aspects of such an employee, which include impatience, an exaggerated sense of self-importance, and other peculiarities, in order to retain the positive benefits of the employee's knowledge and experience. Although she also cautions that managers have to weigh the benefits against the taxing effects, upon managers and staff, of employing an ""outlandish prima donna"". She also recommends that rule-bending not extend to allowing the peculiarities of a true know-it-all with odd habits to be displayed to outsiders, such as customers and other visitors, and that such employees be clearly requested not to flout their eccentricities when such visitors call. She also states that managers should not be afraid of asking a genius employee questions, and should insist upon mutual respect and not adopt a self-deprecating attitude simply in order to placate such employees. Lloyd similarly advises managers to take a strong line against any form of intellectual bullying, either of others or indeed of the manager. For the Know-It-All who doesn't, Pincus recommends to managers that they give praise where it is due, and that they assign such employees to work together with one, or two, other people, and regularly check for signs of stress. Notess observes that the last tactic mentioned can be unsuccessful if a Know-It-All is paired with a novice, since the Know-It-All quickly takes control away from the novice. LLoyd observes that getting a point across to a Know-It-All can sometimes be difficult, and require much repetition, because such people are more interested in what they themselves are saying than in listening to others. Please post suggestions for rewrites below; if we cannot find consensus, it might be worth seeking a third opinion or an RfC. '''chatspy " +"==July 2007== Dear 87.9.154.199, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate people coming here to contribute, however your recent edits were unhelpful, and have now been removed. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing for a while, (possibly even indefinitely!) That would be a shame. Instead, why not help improve Wikipedia by editing constructively? If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Have a great day! - Ariel♥Gold " +I declined the speedy delete request because the reason given doesn't match any of the criteria in Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. If there's a good chance that this article can be expanded and given enough content to qualify at least as a stub, then there shouldn't be a rush to delete it. If there are still objections to the article, then the processes WP:PROD or WP:AFD apply. Asking for speedy deletion has a chilling effect on editors who are trying to create new articles. (Elkspeak) +Update? Would updating this: '''004 +" Stan, You've gotta admit, the funniest line uttered in this rap war was ""With your platinum blonde hair you look like a ho/Like Eminem should stand for 'Marylin Monroe'"" You're making me wanna reedit Eminem's site, and mention that line there. It's amazing to me what a biased, little Eminem fan you are. As far as embarrassing goes, did Everlast ever get into it with a puppet? Do comedians dressed as homosexual designers single Everlast out of the audience to pick on? Lethal and Eminem were friends until he made the comment that Eminem would catch an ass whipping if he and Everlast ever got into it. Fred Durst also agreed, and he was never in House of Pain. Regardless, this is Everlast's Wikipedia entry. His album sales belong here AND ARE MENTIONED. Eminem's don't. " +" Regarding edits made during January 9 2007 (UTC) to Blues Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. — (竜龍) " +" IP, it takes two to edit-war and I note that you've removed the image four times while Maias has restored them only three times. (✉) " +hahaha ok im sorry i just wanted to see if u could do me a favour but its cool i understand.. im just curious how old u r its not that big a deal is it.. and also.. since ud kno a lot bout computers.. i have this spyware thing n it comes up with warning every few mins sayin how im at risk n it made my homepage sumfin 2 do with downloading sum program 2 get rid of it.. n it keeps annoying me.. ne ideas?? thank u +POV Stating what is in the movie is not POV. +Year page formatting of multiple events Hello, I'm sending you this message since you were involved in the August 2005 survey on year pages. As I don't know if you've gathered, somebody has been fighting for a change to the house style on how to notate multiple events on the same date. A discussion is currently in progress - your contribution (including whether you still favour the style you voted for or have changed your mind) would be appreciated! +" Episodes, I see this a lot when you edit, but with half hour tv shows, but hour long episodes are counted as two, not one. I would say you wouldn't have to put those in, but the episode list has a section for the production code, so normally most shows, iCarly, How to Rock , Jessie, etc. if it's an hour long episode for season one the code will be 111-112 because it counts as two and since the wikipedia asks for a production code, I think it's needed. Since itunes does not show production code order rather just list the episodes as their shown on TV, that do not include that. This is why I strongly feel that shows like Victorious (episode""Freak the Freak Out"") and others should be listed as two and not one. It was an hour long episode after all, and if you go back and check how many episodes Nickelodeon ordered for the first season of Victorious it says 20, which was also confirmed by the shows creator Dan Schneider. I strongly disagree that it should say 19 (along with other shows that have been edited)" +" Answering the call That was certainly a very inspiring newsletter! Okie dokie, let's see what we can do. D I doubt I can contribute much to U.S legislation-related articles (shame what happened in California, though...), but I'm sure there's some relatively important Start-class article waiting for some love... ^_^ See ya! (¿Sí?) " +The Eleventh Hour Wikipedia must be kept accurate at all times, I posted a reliable source regarding The Eleventh Hout airing on ITV1 therefore my decision to edit that to the article displaying that info still stands. +I did not start making it personal. And let's face it, socialists always focus on and mix up racism with other forms of words. +REDIRECT Talk:Recurring characters in the Front Mission series +I have made elaborate arguments on the talk page that never ever anybody cared to respond to. I have argued that (1) Heleen Mees is not known outside the Netherlands for her feminist views and that the article therefore can not lead with that; (2) the numerous publications by Heleen Mees in international media do deserve to be mentioned; (3) the article should not include undue references to the dismissed charges, beyond the mentioning that she was charged and the charges are now set for dismissal. If you think that 12 references to the dismissed charges do not amount to character assassination, then you have other standards than I have. +Your failure as an administrator I would like to bring 's help to your attention so you can see what you should have done. Further explanation is all I asked for, but you failed at that. Administrator's like Chaser are why Wikipedia is as good as it is. Administrator's like you are why Wikipedia will never be that good. I bring this to your attention so that you can strive to meet Chaser's example. Thank you, and have a nice day. +Me Blow me and ban this ip from the whole site. +Any admins reviewing this can see a longer statement by the editor now known as Hardicanute over at Talk:Denis Avey#2nd Reply. He offers some details about his past accounts. +" Unfortunately, I disagree with you here. When you press ""Save page,"" you make the text property of WP. talk #c " +" Comments like that clarify why advocates should never be allowed to dominate an article. Have you for a moment considered the ramifications of your ""No"" philosophically? They certainly arn't anarchist in nature. People can use words however they do, just as they can behave as they like, your protests notwithstanding. ( | talk | contributions) 08:02, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +Saw your article was up for speedy deletion, and just wanted to offer a suggestion as to how to combat it. Generally speaking, a personal site isn't accepted as the only mark of somebody's notability. A lot of people have personal sites, and they aren't notable for it. The best thing to do would be to find a couple of other sources about Hammond, talking about his project, and link those; newspaper articles work, as do gallery notices and exhibit reviews. If you have some kind of print source - an exhibition notice, or a catalogue with a bio - cite that as well. It's not as easily checked, but it's usually a good mark of notability. Hope this helps! +|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-cricket-world-cup-2015/content/story/853317.html|website=ESPNcricinfo|accessdate=21 March 2015}} External links CricketArchive Player Profile Riaz on Twitter Category:1985 births Category:Living people Wahab, Riaz Wahab, Riaz Wahab, Riaz Wahab, Riaz Category:Cricketers at the 2011 Cricket World Cup Category:Cricketers at the 2015 Cricket World Cup Category:Kent cricketers Category:Cricketers who have taken five wickets on Test debut Category:Lahore Blues cricketers Category:Lahore Whites cricketers Category:Hyderabad (Pakistan) cricketers Category:Karachi Port Trust cricketers Category:National Bank of Pakistan cricketers Category:Punjab (Pakistan) cricketers Category:Sportspeople from Lahore Category:Ruhuna Royals cricketers Category:Punjabi people +My username doesn't show when editing in another language Hello Number 57 I wrote an article on Ohalo College in Hebrew (מכללת אוהלו) in the Hebrew Wikipedia and after saving it I realised I was not logged in, and when trying to log in it did not let me. Can I only log in in the English Wikipedia then? Do I need a username for each language I use? Now the history of this article doesn't show my name as the first editor and contributor. By the way, I noticed you deleted my section Aims and Objectives from Ohalo College. Is the reason because it might have been commercial? +" OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG Article Clean-up I decided to do a major over-haul on the article. I tried organizing and removing information that isn't neccisary. The article still contains the major section but they are just cleaned up now. It didn't take as long as I thought too. - Co-host auditions I think that the audition seciton is not as relevant anymore considering it's been a year and their is a 99% chance that none of the ""contestants"" will be announced as winner. Does anyone else agree with me that we should remove the section? - nofeedback I'm getting no feedback so i'm assuming it's ok. - Incomplete Segment List I noticed last time that there was a complete list of segments that were there before AOTS started its new set. Now after they got back from E3 and the new set took effect, some of the segments are gone, both former and current. In order for a wii to be effective and accurate, ALL of the segments, including those that are deleted, should be listed. So somebody needs to add the deleted segments there please. I cleaned up the section around that time and deleted segments that didn't need to be listed on the article. There were also a lot of segments listed that only happened once or twice. Also there were a lot of skits listed as well which are not segments. I think after a certain period of time old segments probably won't be relevant to the article. - Do they even do Live Music Thursday any more? Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point Cleanup Co-ordination This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that: the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. the article has multiple overlapping problems. the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. You can use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. When there is a consensus that the article is cleaned up please remove the cleanup tag from the articleDiscussion To be honest, I do not know why this was tagged as needing cleanup. I think the information is laid out pretty much as well as could be. I do feel that the History section needs work, but everything else looks fine (and the tables listing the show's features are quite excellent), so I don't think a cleanup tag on the aritcle as a whole is necessary. However, I am not going to simply remove it, as others may disagree with me. I got the botmessage on my Talk Page when I logged in today, and it said that this article needed cleanup. I checked it, thinking someone had shifted the tables all around or made all of the paragraphs single-sentence rambles... But it was essentially the same as it always was: tables in good shape, information about the cast, etc. This might never be a complete article (seeing as it airs 5 nights a week) but I don't think a ""Cleanup"" tag is necessary in this case. Maybe something more specific is required, but I would support deleting the tag. Still has the cleanup message, and I don't know why. It's not like the page is getting vandalized; it was put on Semi-Protection on January 26th. Any thoughts on this? The article can never really be ""complete"", since the show is an ongoing process. テレビ番組の攻撃！ Probably not note worthy, but this Japanese writing flashes on the screen for a second during the new intro (actually, quite old now). It translates +REDIRECT Talk:Administrative divisions of China/Archive 3 +This list of sources needs to be trimmed and updated. I have made a start. More to be done. +| accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. +Hi! I will look at it. Thanks. +Yes, you are correct. Sure, a video floppy (VF) can only theoretically store 1-2 seconds of motion video, but the VF was not designed for such, it was designed for storing still frames of video (for electronic photography or stills), as is mentioned in this article. So it was quite a useful format for its time, its uses also mentioned in this article. +It's published by Johns Hopkins. What's this scorecard site that we trust it? (talk ⋅ contribs) +well jew's have been persecuted and put down by the world and are continuously and when a jew makes a difference...or when a memeber of any minority makes a significant contribution of any type...it's only proper that somewhere...it be noted. +Pronunciation of the name The one given now contradicts the data in the Vietnamese phonology article; iə's should be substituted for jə's 89.231.110.85 +Oh yes, john let us all join the hate fest against turks. Remember Turks are evil and Turkiye should be nuked...Yesssssss +you're welcome 67.70.32.20 +" Ahem, excuse me - the clip you provided from the interview came nowhere near ""anti-Zionism inevitably leads to antisemitism"" as the Wiesenthal Centre believes Fischer said. Fischer seems to be saying he took this path himself (bizarre though it seems), but he disavows it as being general. And, while the SWC has done a great deal of good work over the years (or had done before it parted from its founder?), it's fitness as an RS for what people say is blown away by, just as a for instance, Cecilie Surasky here. talk " +Bethesda Softworks Hey, you just reverted the Bethesda Softworks page after I edited it. I was just cleaning it up a bit I added a separate List of Bethesda Softworks games and took out the giant list that was in the actual article. Would appreciate it if you let me revert back to my changed version. Sorry, I did a good-faith revert: you must've accidentally held down the 'j' key on the computer. Go ahead. ()-C-E +Ha, ha, too true. I don't know what beef you have with this guy but it's funny. 70.127.201.57 +Because since he started on May, even if it were that he didn't use checkuser, checkusers can not find any link between his previous account and Ehud because he changed location. - +" Move or eliminate Cast section? The Featured Article Review comments (above) suggest that the Cast section ""can be eliminated without much tweaking of the previous section."" What do people think about integrating this section into List of characters in Kung Fu Hustle? Steve, if you see this, would that be appropriate? " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Arthur Conan Doyle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +yes the pages say I have edited it, but look how long ago it was edited with no one having a problem with it until now, including YOU since you are avid on Steve Nash's page and did not revert it. It was only when Nikkimaria brought it up, and you rashly block me. +I removed his bullshits. 114.179.18.37 +This message is regarding the page Social Distortion. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +RE The idea that a camp just for women is unusual until you read the Geneva Convetion 1929 - separating sexes and nationalities into their own camp/section was required. The women from Lidice were sent here where most of them survived. +" non-NPOV + inaccurate information Regarding the piece of text ""Since most of those hadith are on the authority of Abu Huraira, most Shia dismiss them as a sad examples of what happens when all Sahaba are counted as trustworthy: A clear breach in Tawhid, the belief that God is above its creation."" Reasons for removal: Abu Huraira is one of the most prolific muhaddithin and a source of many of the sahih hadith. The phrase ""most shia"" does not cite any authority or text and could therefore be completely fabricated. Not to mention that there are over a dozen subsects among the shi`a. ""sad examples of what happens"" <- that's a non-NPOV (non-Neutral Point Of View) See God as one sees the full moon or the sun in the sky. Or seeing part of God on the day of judgement is not a contradiction that God is above His (not ""its"") creatures in every respect. " +pure bullshit. The Dissident Aggressor +Indeed. I noticed a strange phenomenon in Russia: over all, the birth rates ARE growing (12.1 in 2008 vs 12.4 in 2009; 11.5 in 2007 vs 12.1 in 2008), at the end of each of those years, they went down slightly (12.5 -> 12.4 in 2009, for example). I'll have to research this more to really see why this is. But if I had to say now, I'd say it is because of the New Year and Orthodox Christmas (as well as Muslim Kurban Bairam) celebrations. November, December, January is when everyone is celebrating and partying. Not a lot of people are conceiving during this time. +Oppose US bias. 76.66.202.139 +Just what I knew from being in and learning about Japan really. But there are a few websites, especially if you read Japanese, and quite a few books available. 16:21, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC) +Hello Hi. Just wanted to say hello to a fellow White Supremacist. Nice to see there are people like me on Wikipedia. +" Request for notification Please could you do me a small favour? I've started a discussion template page regarding the use of the parameter causing the dispute between myself and . Since I've been asked not to post on his talk page, please could you let him know about it for me? I know this is a bit tiresome, but I've seen users warned for posting even polite requests after having been asked to stay off a talk page, so I thought I'd be safe rather than sorry. Thanks.  •T•C•E• " +Germantown Thanks for pointing out the problem with the disambiguation links in the Germantown order of battle article. An eager but somewhat careless individual introduced those recently. I have changed the ones that could be fixed. I removed the links that were either pointing to the wrong person or pointing to a disambiguation page that did not include the person. +Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Anthony Bradbury sucks cock and eats shit, Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Anthony Bradbury sucks cock and eats shit, Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Anthony Bradbury sucks cock and eats shit, Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Anthony Bradbury sucks cock and eats shit, Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbysouthbanof sucks cocks Notrhbys +" Invitation to the December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive " +That was the most minor observation on the page, a minor finding in one survey. You need to do better then that. +Please. I am afraid you may try to harm me. +" hey can you have look at . it doesn't show how it should.thank you T " +Please do, suck my cock. +October 2010 (UTC) Okay, John is back and editing, but has not replied. That usually means he doesn't know. ) I'm seeking elsewhere. And this is not much of an update, either, so I won't TB you on it. (talk) 12:04, 18 +Please, Hello OluwaCurtis , Please,don't delete the article i recently created as i even thought it were full referenced...Just New to creating Wikipedia articles,please help me and show me how http://www.tukabyine.com/news/7005/jay-polly-promises-to-win-guma-guma/ +Verifiability In the same manner that verifiability was added to the lists of philosophers by century (see those pages), I would like to suggest that someone find some/any general reference works specifically on political philosophy, and adapt this list in a similar fashion. +Hah. So it's 0.05% plus or minus 30%? - 07:52, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) +" An event in this article is a April 30 selected anniversary (may be in HTML comment) A question has been bugging me From the time the first US military advisors stepped in to Vietnam in the early 60s to the final withdrawal of all US troops in 1973 the USSR and China repeatedly warned Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon NOT to cross the DMZ and directly invade North Vietnam. That seems simple enough that we were not allowed to go in to the North BUT my question is were the South Vietnamese Forces allowed to go on the offensive and invade North Vietnam? Did USSR and China ever warn the South not to invade the North? Considering the U.S.'s coordination with and funding for ARVN, I'm sure that they would take South Vietnamese ground forces in North Vietnam much the same way they'd take Marines. The only ""crossing of the DMZ"" that occurred was American bombing raids. Probably not, but it is doubtful that such an operation could have been pulled off. 23 July 2005 It's hard to imagine what further threats the major communist powers could have used to dissuade S.V. from doing anything. But I agree with CJK, the limited competence of the ARVN in offensive operations seems well-established in the historical record, e.g. the offensive in Laos. (talk) 03:04, 2005 July 24 (UTC) The forgotten factor in this little chat is the fact that the South and its dissident ""South"" Vietnamese were often the target of U.S. bombing. Keep in mind that the terms ""North"" and ""South"" were circumstantial, and not actually representative of the demographic split. ""North and South"" often simply repeats the ideological and geographic claims about the nature of the war, which American soldiers, for example, found to be not the reality: Many (perhaps most) people in the ""democratic"" South were pro-independence, despite the Western-allied/ethnic Catholic elite. Hence any use of ""North and South"" carries an inherent biased disparity with the facts. -|t I don't know what you are talking about. We were discussing whether or not the Soviets or Chinese would react if South Vietnam sent its forces to invade North Vietnam. 24 July 2005 ""I dont know what you are talking about."" Well, it would really help if you did, wouldnt it? -|t Well maybe you shouldn't bring up unrelated issues in the middle of a specific discussion. 25 July 2005 I'd just like to commend the recent additions to the article. Actually, to my understanding, there were still many rescue raids (of captured POWs) or commando attacks that were conducted by either U.S. commandos or the ""Biet Dong Quan"" (the ARVN equivalent) against the north during the war. It's an honour to meet celebrities like you, Trey and Parker Stone. I appreciate your criticisms to my editions on the Vietnam War page. - . well others watching this page are quite capable of RVing Marxist language and POV it seems. And would RVing 'capitalist language and POV' be ok with you? -|t I don't know what ""capitalist language"" means, but if it existed and was POV then I would have no problems with its reversion. We were actually talking about a full scale attack by South Vietnam, not a raid. 24 July 2005 Let's assume the South Vietnamese Army, without US troop support, did gather a formidable invasion force and did cross the DMZ in to the North, would the Chinese and/or USSR intervene and play the ""defending an ally card"" for the North exactly like how we did for the South? I know this is a hypothetical assumption, but still, it's irrelevant, because the ARVN was never able to operate well without U.S. assistance. So answering your hypothetical, if that did happen active intervention in the form of Chinese or Soviet troops would probably not be necessary given the PAVN's superior capabilities. if we had somehow managed to make the ARVN into a capable offensive force and we were able to take over North Vietnam then yes, I'd expect the PLA (army in China) to intervene just like they had in North Korea. but American go +"::::::Part of my problem with your (and Geogre's) request is that if I accept it and follow it strictly to the letter, it would be pointless, and if I accept it and follow it in spirit, it would be cruel as well as undermining of my major work in Wikipedia. As I mentioned above, I rarely visit the arbcom IRC channel (which itself is not heavily used even by members of the ArbCom); swearing it off is largely a meaningless act. I could readily stop participating in the mailing list, because I would essentially get the same information via other channels. You seem to think that this is the only backchannel that exists or that I participate in. It's not. It's not even the most important one. For me to accede to the spirit of your demand would require that, inter alia, I cut myself off from personal communication with people like James and Kat people I count as friends because they would likely continue to discuss the same issues with me that we currently discuss from time to time on the arbcom list; my opinions would still enter the discussion, just not as directly. Furthermore, one of the major resources I use for collaboration with the Foundation, and specifically with Danny and Brad which, by necessity is a wholly private resource includes James and Kat as regular participants. Withdrawing from that particular resource would hamper my ability to provide assistance to Brad and Danny, which represents probably the bulk of what I do on the English Wikipedia these days, and the part that I find most fulfilling. I also frequently participate in ""backchannel"" conversation with Kat, James, Dmcdevit (another arbitrator), and occasionally smoddy on the restricted IRC admins channel. Should I also withdraw from that channel? It seems that the you and Geogre, through your joint demand, are seeking to require that I isolate myself totally from the entire ArbCom (Geogre's proposal even requires that I even refrain from public communication with members of the ArbCom; I don't recall if yours does, although I believe it does not). Those people, some of them, at least, are my friends. For you to ask such a thing is really quite heartless. It would be akin to my demanding that you have no nonpublic contact with the myriad of friends you have no doubt made on Wikipedia. So, you must forgive me: I would rather resign my privileges with honor than accept either of the alternatives left to me: giving you a hollow victory gained through my unethical manipulation of your own ignorance, or the personal harm of agreeing to cut myself off from those I count as friends. " +" Firstly, The concept of ""state terrorism"" as it applies to declared war is inherently fringe. The USA and the Empire of Japan were engaged in a declared war. The idea of ""war terrorism"", as outlined in the article now is a a neologism and shouldn't be included on Wikipedia. When you include information on the ""targeting of innocents to achieve a political goal"" Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets and were defended by an air force. What you have included, and reverted to goes on about the use of air power in unrelated conflicts as if that too were ""terrorism"". ""Terrorism"" and ""terror"" ""terrifying"" are different things. A declared war between 2 nation states is certainly terrifying, but it isn't ""terrorism"" and as such the opinions of a the few college professors who specialize in this are given undue weight here. Secondly, I am not the one who is ""edit warring"". Per the WP:BRD cycle you were bold and added material to the encyclopedia, I disagree with the materials inclusion and reverted. It was objected to. That is where you were supposed to take it to the talk page and discuss the changes, instead you reverted. That's edit warring. " +" The dispute appears to be over the added content, "" A source says ""civil violation"". Terjen keeps changing it to ""civil infraction"" and it's not at all clear if ""civil violation"" is the same thing as ""civil infraction"" - it's safer to stick to the original wording of the source. ""this civil offense should not be construed to diminish or qualify any other penalties to which an illegal alien may be subject"" was added with a reference to the Immigration and Naturalization Act section 274D where residing in the US is identified as a civil offense, it also adds, ""Nothing in this section shall be construed to diminish or qualify any penalties to which an alien may be subject for activities proscribed by section 243(a) or any other section of this Act"". Terjen appears to believe that the way I summarized that statement constitutes original research. I have posted a question in the Wiki Law project to get outsider opinions on whether I properly summarized it or not. Terjen continues to put the statement that residing in the US is a civil offense at the top of the paragraph. Considering that most illegal immigrants are sojourners, not residents, this edit makes no sense and I've put the paragraph's subject sentence, ""Various unlawful immigration-related acts, depending on the circumstances, may be criminal and/or civil offenses"", at the beginning. Terjen edited the word ""crime"" to ""misdemeaner"", but provided no source for doing so. I reverted it.-66.194.62.5 " +Yes, further to this, I have checked it out and removed that paragraph. The citation supplied did not lead to a story. Other news reports such as on the Weinberg statement refer to general allegations of anti-Israeli and anti-semitic positions in Britain rather than the BBC specifically; it appears this para was spun up without evidence to support it. +theypere is no 14 Cylinder version yet.. i don't think it wil come in this type anyway +First of all, I don't calling editors stupid, but they edits is foolish. They don't know nothing about Army ranks and insignia of the Russian Federation, but always change this article! Second, all for you, Latinus and Nixer socks? May be they are someone's sock? Especially Nixer like sock of Roitr/Tt1. He revert all edits make be other users. For your reflection. - +I know what you mean. You definitely wrong and certainly retarded, but I know what you're trying to say. +" I can hardly believe that after a severe pruning at the time of the recent review, the introductory section has been needlessly expanded yet again to an over-inflated length. I also question the accuracy of some of the content. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but the Kingdom of the Picts was not called ""Scotland"", and ""Alba"" was the kingdom that resulted in the merger of the Scottish kingdom of Dalriada with the Pictish kingdom, known to the Romans as ""Caledonia"". | Talk " +Constructive indications involve proposing alternatives that would make the material acceptable to you. +test for time Time is +Wikipedia is anti-White There is a page for antisemitism, a page for Racism against Japanese, yet the page for anti White racism redirects here. This is despite a very large history of documented anti-White sentiment and Anti-White hate crime. Yet another reason anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. NPOV my a** +.... .... Edgar, it's Saturday night! Why aren't out there, hanging out with hot chicks? On another note, I really don't know how you manage to fit in a job as a top-notch encycolpedist in between stacking shelves in the supermarket, pumping gas or a working call centre or what ever the hell it is that you do.. Wow! you really do fit the profile, don't you? Weak, effeminate and ineffectual in the real world. Later, loser. X +" okay ""fag"" Obviously you need to leave the house more and lurk wikipedia less. When you begin to sign my comments for me you know you're gay for me. Like anybody actually fucking cares who posted it except you." +" Attention user ""meters"" his royal highness jizzul the rager is very angry, he wish for your testicles to be delivered to him on a ""silver platter"" as you are clearly a chump, a squad of royal raging viruses will soon infect your PC. Many kind regards The office of his royal highness jizzul the rager." +Hi! I believe you shouldn't re-add a whole chunk of unreferenced contentious content to an article about an orginization, you should only re-add that content if it is fully referenced. Without references it's little more than gossip, do encyclopedias usually include gossip? +In the past a similar list was deleted. I think however that the list is notable as punctuation marks/typographical symbols are discussed collectively in serious publications. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jbp/bab/2004/00000050/00000003/art00003 http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1985-16928-001 +Just a small not on Pedro Nunes - he was not a Jew who converted to catholicism (he was catholic, though - in 1548 he was even knighted with an honorific catholic order by the King of Portugal), he was a New Christian of Jewish origin, that is to say, someone whose ancestors (no one knowns if recent of distant) were Jewish and converted or were forced to convert to catholicism. He never had problems with the Portuguese Inquisition, although two of his grandsons were arrested, Matias Pereira from 1623 to 31 and Pedro Nunes Pereira from 1623 to 32 (they were both released alive and given back their properties, though, which was quite rare). +Image Reply Hey, I got your message. The image you uploaded is A.) Not a great representation of how his dress defines his character, and B.) Very weak fair use rationale. The only reason Rachel has a promotional image is because of the fact that it represents her character. In fact, the only reason Kurt and Rachel have non-free images is because of the fact that their wardrobe can at times define their characters and a free image wouldn't represent that as well. The promotional image you uploaded only shows him with a fancy tie and regular dress, which would be equivalent to one that was deleted previously. The image could easily be substituted with one of the free images of Chris Colfer at the Wikipedia Commons, whereas the screenshot is depicting a fancy coat, tie, etc. that Kurt is regularly seen in. There has been a long discussion about this at WP:GLEE. +Oh, my error. And thanks for putting the template upon my User Page. Previously, I did not commit this mistake, but due to hurry, I copy pasted the template in the adopters talk pages. Thanks so much. And can you please adopt me? Hoping so. Cheers. +Red Act is a complete nutcase who keeps stalking me and reverting any edit I make.79.75.40.182 +" Sockpuppetry Hi Daniel, How do you think we should deal with editors who have been ""convicted"" of sockpuppetry on Wikipedia but have not been indefblocked? How would others know of the user's past with sockpuppetry? I have run into this problem a few times and no one has given me a good answer. Thanks. BhaiSaab talk " +Lahiru Kannangara Getting really scared ? Lahiru Kannangara: Aerospace Student at CUNY, York college - spends his time harassing wikipedians and promoting Sri Lankan government propaganda. Given final d sentence warning. Now that we have uncloaked your identity..the world has become a nasty place hasn't it ? If you don't cease and desist, you know the consequences very well. We sure hope you don't won't to end up as sun soaked road kill. We know you are away from your college residence, so don't worry we are not stupid, but when you do come back we will have to do some whacking. Go ahead and attempt to get someone to block this account.... Ugly, smelly, bespectacled, d-w-e-e-b brown guy with uneven teeth riddled with bullets is no biggie in the big city... Clock is ticking. Grim Reaper +Avruhom Yehida Balser I very much disagree that the article that was deleted was advertising; I have never bought anything from his store as a matter of fact, but I do know that his is one of the most used online Judaica shops out there. What can I do to make the article acceptable? +and didnt i just edit ur discussion page and arent you getting really pissed and arent i using th eword and too many times? +" Problem with whitespace in convert Jimp– You can probably figure out what is going wrong faster than I can, but currently there is something strange going on. It may be due to some recent changes? {{convert|2|m|abbr=on}} results in {{convert| 2|m|abbr=on}} results in {{convert|2 |m|abbr=on}} results in If the strange behavior is still happening, then the last two will give red ""expression errors"". Thanks! ―Œ(talk) " +" I'm tired Hi, I would not have contacted you (or anyone) on this matter since there is nothing unusual from what I see regularly but because of the recent incident where you served a a judge of sorts, I figured I give you an example. Things like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1938_Polish_ultimatum_to_Lithuania&diff;=next&oldid;=201584454 this] and this, an this recent ""notification"" that my contributions are watched (note the date of the article's creation, nd note that it could'n hae been on anyone watchlist) happens a lot in Lithianian topics. Those are all diffs from just one day (today) and the first one is especially powerful. Now, I do not have and I do not intend to develop a habit of stacking up diffs to attack Piotrus' ""when I have enough"" but It's just a tiny example, what Lithuanian editors have go through. I've already expressed my angst on another page. Finally there is my question - should I run to AE with that? Should I demand ""sanctions for stalking and offensive speech? I would not have even brought this up, as I do usually ignore this stuff. But because of the recent incident, I just want to illustrate, what Lithuanian editors have to deal with on a daily basis. Regards. " +" Request for edit summary When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled ""Edit summary"" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – " +No problem. You might find Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Light current and Wikipedia:Abuse reports/Tiscali DSL enlightening. Cheers! (talk) +I will follow the guidelines as they are. But would surely hope that you do some checking in other publications than the English one as well. And be frank. I at least use my own name and not a nickname like yourself. I think that counts for something. At least for getting my butt kicked under my own name. Anthony Signing off Goodnight and goodluck +Waz up! Don't come here often. 2016SanKarS +- looks to me like he needs some administratin' +Proposed merge not agreed to, removed tag and cleaned up article +Well, I certainly wasn't denying that this kind of thing can happen. i was just noting that nobody seems to say anything one way or the other about her close relatives, and that the whole thing seems to be cherry-picking. It's also rather anglocentric - it's not as though Charlotte came out of a wild area where we know nothing of her other family members, and yet there seems to be no interest in whether she looked like a typical member of the family, or not. At any rate, I have no particular problem with some mention of this. I do think that it's pretty disproportionate at this point. k 23:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) +What RealDealBillMcNeal really is RealDealBillMcNeal is a big fat retard. +Great!: Can i reach you on a IM? I want my article deleted now then to see it suffer. Can you go ahead and do that for me? And make it so i can re-make it someday thank you. I don't suppose you could go ahead and delete everythin i've ever added and remove me account forever too? +And if Nature India is right and the field does take off, then we will reflect that. But, as has been pointed out before, Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to be the launch-pad for that initiative. Guy () +The edit history shows two editors accusing each other of copy/paste violations. Proscibe a course of WP:CIVIL, WP:COPY and WP:OWN and they should feel better in the morning. +No it's 104 or 87 shells as differ a bit on how many were carried. +Libertarian Party of Canada +I don't mind if you copy our discussion to the talk page of Bayern's Wikipedia page. +And no doubt people still think FPaS is not harassing me, Ha +Why gran turismo 5 limited? Why are there 50 cars and 15 tracks compared to ps2's 400+ cars and 50 tracks? Gran Turismo 5 isnt that good? +o bad this article on behalf of the wikipadia. one-sided and bed propaganda.This article is organized anti-turkey persons. statistical and survey maximum bad data are obtained by willful.. black propaganda used against turkey. maliciously manipulated the facts. +...and see next section. Let's continue this there. +Rollbacker I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – +By the way, my account had ben around for about 21 hours, not 8 hours. That may make a difference. +" Congratulations! Congratulations! You've deleted more pages per unit time on Wikipedia than ever achieved before. Keep up the good work! 71.52.105.85 " +Fuck off. I will continue to edit small things as I see them. You fucking wikinazis are why Wikipedia's editing community is falling to pieces. 60.226.138.94 +Austin Aztex I think the article Austin Aztex U23 should be merged with the article Austin Aztex. I gathered they are the same team, correct? I know that they dissolved but were restarted recently. Please provide your input as the creator of the article Austin Aztex. +Reread the first five words of my prior comment. That may make it a bit more clear for you. +Bitch nobody cares about your myspace. You ugly as fuck anyways. Begging on wikipedia for myspace friends. You gay as hell +You're right it doesn't matter what happened months ago or why. I'm sorry to have posted something so paranoid. My family's having financial problems and my house is in danger of being taken away from me. I guess I let the stress of the situation, get the better of me. I have merged the article, I need to know if you'll support me if I make it a redirect. I'll be copying the debate on demographics to Talk:Western United States, when the page does become a redirect, as that is where it would be included now. I'm going to propose a compromise there. -with sincerest apologies, your friend, Jay ()04:05, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC) +Done! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strasbourg-Ortenau&diff;=244323620&oldid;=243185554. Please check and correct the language where necessary. Cheers, +From now on, you are dead to me. +": In any case, it applies at least as ""built up in the mass media by later governments"". His public image is protected by law, supported by the education system and guaranteed by the military. " +" ""Justise Delayed is Justise Denyed"". The ArbCom does not even know what to rule on anymore. Until they decide what to rule on, and go ahead and do something, I am going to keep posting. At least dealing with me will prevent you from molesting gbambino's contribution, which are in my opinion, being unfair harrassed by you, with extreme prejustice. " +" May I remind you of the definiton of ""stub"" according to WP: A stub is an article containing only one or a few sentences of text that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion. Thank you! " +On what source says SLT are natives and they has heritages before 1215 like in SLT page ? No sources but still a great page. Why is that ? I don't know, about which section (history,political reasons) you are talking about. I know the context clearly. About history, Parakramabahu_I_of_Polonnaruwa (1153 to 1186) who considered as greatest king in Sri Lanka sent military campaigns in India and in Myanmar. But he didn't find any significant separate Tamil power near Jaffna. Same story goes with Vijayabahu I of Polonnaruwa(ruled 1055–1110), the greatest warrior king in SL history. Two greatest warrior kings in Sri Lanka never found such a Tamil settlements in Jaffna before 12th century, but now people have found a big invisible settlements. Sri Lanka is multi-ethnic country. Others should think why all the ethnic groups ( Muslims, Burgers, Indian Tamils) lives withing Sinhalese and non of them live with SLT in northern province. If you think only me backing this page who are these people ? +Your false report is already removed by administrator. Поправили негативщика. +REDIRECT Talk:List of Areas of Special Scientific Interest in Antrim +I can't see any answar to your act? Comanche cph +" Suggest you be more thoughtful in this discussion Your suggestions and comments are not at all in line with key wikipedia behavior, including WP:GOODFAITH and Wikipedia:Civility. For example, ""Bullshit"" or ""Put up or Shut up"" or ""Then read a dictionary!"" are over the top and make it difficult to work with you. So far, I have not once been uncivil or personally disrepectful towards you. " +Thanks (MRCA) Thanks for addressing the MCRA issue I brought up. Apparently I have not logged into Wikipedia since 2011, so I just now received your note. This issue is relevant to some research I was doing at the time and that I expect to return to someday, so perhaps I'll resurrect the reference at some point.   | Talk +January 2008 (UTC) Picture this: Wikipedia user_A in China posts material that does not support the current government. User_B is also in China and privately messages user_A that they will report them to the authorities. (as they are required by law to do). Wikipedia would obviously not allow user_B to continue to help suppress the freedom of speech of User_A, especially since the Law of China has no authority over Wikipedia, and neither does the law of the US armed forces. You, Orangemarlin are overstepping your duty, you cling to your past authority like a baby clings to their blanket. You have no business threatening anyone for their actions on wikipedia. Your intent is purely to feel some sort of power over another person, because if you were doing it out of duty you would have gone through with it without informing the second party of your actions. Shame on you. 64.230.92.23 23:08, 4 +Repeated vandalism under different identities This user has posted different versions of a POV-filled, error-riddled personal essay nearly 50 times (and counting) on at least 10 different pages since June 27. Every instance has required and received a reversion. So far, it it has been reverted by at least six editors: User:Ixfd64, User:Dcandeto, User:Qviri, User:Adam_Bishop, User:PrimeCupEevee, User:Garywill. Initial 200-word version: Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 11:00, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 11:02, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 11:03, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 11:05, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 11:05, June 27, 2006 Expanded version of above: Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 17:14, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 17:17, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 17:18, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 17:19, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 17:20, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 17:22, June 27, 2006 Further expanded version: Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 18:55, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 18:58, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 18:59, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 19:10, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 19:13, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 19:15, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 19:22, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 19:23, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario, 19:24, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 19:25, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 19:26, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 19:27, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 19:30, June 27, 2006 Regional municipality, 19:32, June 27, 2006 Regional municipality, 19:35, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 19:36, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 19:54, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 20:09, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario, 20:11, June 27, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 20:12, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 20:13, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 20:16, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 20:16, June 27, 2006 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario,10:56, July 2, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 10:58, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario, 10:58, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario, 10:59, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, 11:00, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 11:00, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of York, Ontario, 11:04, July 2, 2006 Oxford County, Ontario, 11:06, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario, 11:37, July 2, 2006 Regional Municipality of York, Ontario, 11:41, July 2, 2006 Peel Regional Council, 07:10, July 4, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 14:25, July 7, 2006 Peel Regional Council, 03:38, July 9, 2006 Peel Regional Council, 08:18, July 9, 2006 Muskoka District Municipality, Ontario, 08:33, July 9, 2006 +A charakter such as Kollias cant be on the same list as heroes,artists & serious writers. +I am on a temporary wikibreak +You are just Jealous that you aren't a part of the GAYTOURAGE... you probably don't even now how to WERQ it! Megna James +how good pussy taste! i love to eat pussy. i could eat it all day long baby! just say when and im here. for all yall who loves to be eatin call me up 9036406239 xoxo +This obviously doesn't suggest the creature was first bred there, but that its connection is Classical. +You just don't stop, do you? +Map What figures are the map based on? On the description of the image, I found a link to this file . I do not see a proper plot of this info on the map. Furthermore, those World Bank statistics show statistics of countries and not particular regions. The map shows otherwise. +" What is an acceptable definition for the term ""basic geography""? Please see the new subsection at the FLC discussion. I've presented a suggestion there. Any suggestions for improving it would be most appreciated. Thank you. " +REDIRECT Talk:Antoine de Paris +"* Electrodeionization ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.electrochem.org/dl/interface/fal/fal98/IF8-98-Pages26-29.pdf. (talk) " +What is your name. Why is that your name +(2) How can I be in a minority and a NEW subject? A Chris Long speech? Is a 1-1 decision put me in the minority? Your bias is really showing. You've made a character judgement and you won't look at the facts and the rules, it seems to me. You'd rather marginalize me rather than deal with the facts as they are. no?72.0.36.36 +Not sure If I'm mistaken in reverting and trying my best to restore the articles that you have edited please let me know. I sincerely don't understand what you are doing. +No response? OK I will revert and fix your changes back. Thanks. +" SamEV , the spanish territories goberned by spanish kings count actually as spanish possesion(at least those of Philip II),Charles I was the king of Spain and he ruled mostly of Europe being the emperor of Spain and the HRE,the spanish empire have the same sense under Charles V & Phillip II. It doesn't have sense to add the territories of Phillip II and not to add those of Charles I, since they had the same ""emprise"", and both were kings of Spain. And the most important thing,SPAIN BECAME A POWERFUL EMPIRE UNDER CHARLES I , not under his son. 89.7.100.151 " +post on this page with out permission. +If anyone has any other references, please suggest them here or add them to the article. I couldn't find anything by Kuzio but I'd imagine more searching would quickly yield results. - +REDIRECT Talk:The Holocaust/Archive 12 +Oh no you don't. F&CK;! +editors like you are what is wrong with Wikipedia. What you are doing is making Wikipedia worse. You are not interested in actual information, or helping people, but in enforcing the rules. It is really disgusting. What is worse is how people who want to make Wikipedia better, such as providing accurate and helpful information are simply argued with and actively discouraged from participating. You say trash the place then leave but what has done is actually provide references. He doesn't have to do anything else. That is what the small-minded over-zealous editors should be doing, namely taking the actual informative content and doing their little grammar and formatting edits. That is all you are good for, so do it, do that work. Stop discouraging people with actual content from participating with the threatening notes. Such a tragedy of the commons. +I think what you have suggested would be acceptable. I appreciate you taking time to look into this matter! +It should be added so the people know the difference between the two versions, which may be unclear to someone who is not aware of the special edition. Aswell as people who are buying the game as a gift. Also it's interesting. +":In response to the interwiki and internal incoming links, that is also dependent on recentism. eg, Victor Trumper, called the ""crown prince of the golden age"" because of his being regarded as the most supreme stylist of all time, and also the best batsman in the world of the era 1890-1920, one of the Six Giants of the Wisden Century, inuaugural inductee into ACHOF has only 105 incoming links and two interwiki. Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the current captain of India, who has only played Test cricket for three years, and is ranked about 30th in the world for batting and is criticised regualrly for making too many unforced errors with ball-catching, has 170-odd incoming links and 8 interwiki links because of recentism and the fact that every modern cricket series/tournament has its own page and the player lists link to him everywhere. If they ranked the players in the last 100 years Dhoni would not even be ranked in the top 200, let alone the top six like Trumper. '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') " +" WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers January 2008 Newsletter The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter Volume 2, no. 1 — January 2008 ""I remember I was taking a piss at a party once in this multi-urinal stall bathroom, and this guy was pissing next to me and he looks over at me pissing and starts singing 'Under the Bridge' in some twisted key and I though 'Okay. We've definitely made it now; a drunken guy is singing out of key one of our songs next to me in the urinal."" - Anthony Kiedis News and Announcements Welcome to the WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers' third Newsletter, dated Tuesday, January 1, 2008; happy new year! Red Hot Chili Peppers discography was promoted to Featured List status.One Hot Minute was promoted to Good and Featured Article status. Flea (musician) and Niandra Lades and Usually Just a T-Shirt'' were promoted to Good Article status New members Since our last newsletter was sent in October, several new contributors have joined the project: , , and . Editors TC You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated (talk) ." +, 13 July 2010 (UTC) thanks for your input, it was such a pleasure interacting with you, now that the overlapping projects assessment are done, we need never interact again. projects opting out of policy, how charming, some projects are more equal than others, can i take a vote on SI project opting out of copyright vios? 03:22 +REDIRECT Talk:The Platinum Collection (Queen album) +Alrighty. I'll make a proper print-out reading in a week or so and then put it up for PR. Any help is welcome. Cheers! Isotalo +" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RedRose333 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — xplicit " +Deletion of Dog meat consumption in South Korea I don't think the article should have been deleted. The speedy tagger is very new, and likely not aware of the possibility of reverse copyvios. There are really no edits large enough to be copy pasted. I see an article built bit by bit. I think the alleged copyvio are in fact reverse copyvios. See also: Talk:Dog meat consumption in South Korea#Contested deletion Cheers, +Someone see to the removals above and to this.diff +" Do you see your own contradiction above? Here are the rules ""there is no criticism to Cynefin>>> therefore no criticism allowed on Wiki >>> try to publish criticism in a refereed journal >>> by the way no respectable journal would ever entertain the advancement or criticism of Cynefin, but HBR will advance it!""" +Allright, the fact that I don't agree with you does not mean that I should argue with you. W is the MAN! ) +Also, the DVD usually has special features that can have additional background. +I will also improve the article with many references within the next day or two +" Actually, comments anywhere—even on your own talk page—are subject to the policies here. Your comment clearly violated them and I didn't report it because I don't think that such report typically accomplish anything positive. While it's true that your recent editing has been highly tendentious, disruptive, and (generally wrongly) accusatory, I'm not inclined to play the Wikikindergarten game frequently. Bongomatic " +" This is not the biographer's ""opinion."" This was his ""conclusion"" after numerous interviews, as stated in the source. If you want to know ""who"" all the women were, you should read the book. Assuming that a biographer's research can be somehow ""balanced"" with a woman's mother's statement about seeing her daughter looking ""roughed up"" in a car, is an obvious problem. Biographer's avoid giving their personal ""opinions"" in their books. " +Also when Dave reported me, he claimed my edits were racist, yet he made almost the same comment on the talk page of cantonese people, about northern chinese. +Could anyone update this map? Arkansas, Connecticut and New Hampshire should be dark blue, Hawaii should be light blue, Indiana and Rhode island should be yellow. See , +Describing ID as pseudoscience is only pejorative in so far as ID claims to be a science. That is the way it is used in the lede and the way it is used in the sources. I believe there has been a strong consensus to keep pseudoscience in the title and I see no indication that this consensus has changed. +" Foreign language Refs Latakia Offensive Use foreign language refs ONLY when English language ones not available. Dont use them as well just for the sake of it. This is from a discussion on use of them on The Village Pump. lets talk " +Why was he banned in the first place and his 2012 and 2011 in kickboxing pages removed? If you can't tell me, I understand, but he seemed to just be trying to contribute. Is there any way I can view the former article to help me create a new one? As you probably know, it's quite time consuming. +"I don't think it's too early. But when ever you decide to add a motive section, it should be made clear that Ivins was very probably a Mossad asset. He was a Jew, and the anthrax case fits a pattern of Israeli false-flag operations. See the books by Viktor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad case officer, current status ""defected"". " +here, though I can't say for sure if that page works for non-admins. +Really? Ya don't say? Who'd a thunk? +" Yes: option-shift-hyphen. Easy as pie. (talk) " +1.Bully noise->2.Evasion->3.Oh-so-petulant silencing maneuvre +Don't worry about this TheJPS broad... she is a total numbskull. TheJPS is an extreme left wing editor that uses Wikipedia to bully people with different political beliefs than her own. Also, TheJPS has a small group of left-wing extremist administrators that have all NOMINATED each other and just go around locking pages, deleting articles written by people that have gotten the better of them and an all around rampage of feminine rage! It's good that The JPS has found a place where she can vent, but it's a shame that she loses control. If you see the ' 3RR PROBLEM' section on this page you can see THE JPS having the stuffing beat out of her in a sensible debate... what did THE JPS do? she chased down articles I had ammended, created and edited and deleted them and whatever else she could think of. Not a very nice person. Certainly not very bright. Probably educated in Scotland or Ghana. Oh well. My guess is that she will get hers. Och thy incest lassie! REPMART +" Encyclopedia Briannica ""Socialism"" article says: ""Others advocate a “market socialism” in which the market economy would be directed and guided by socialist planners."" " +" Speedy deletion of Etiwanda High School Drama A tag has been placed on Etiwanda High School Drama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, ""See also"" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to David Lynch. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (mailbox) " +Bias This article is pretty biased, with all the talk about how great the diet is and no criticisms. +320 First Street Please consult others, but let's agree on what the question is. The question is if there are three headquarters buildings all with a common mailing address 320 First Street, but three different street addresses: 320, 400 and 500 First Street, can we show a picture of one of the buildings with sources that may be referring to the mailing address rather than the street address of Levy's particular building. I see people talking past each other on this. Thanks, +, 5 November 2007 (UTC) I don't think I'm the one most in need of a lecture about not seeing the forest for the trees. Look, Duk, if you want to take on the job of my reeducation, I can probably talk to you about it. But if you want to do so, first we need a solid foundation on which to build the discussions. Let's stick to what is known about why I was blocked, okay? JzG blocked me because I complained, in a point incidental to a separate complaint, on a complaints noticeboard, that Rlevse was rude and inconsiderate in his actions towards me. We know that because JzG came right here and said that was why he was blocking me. Rlevse blocked me because I had not responded on Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. We know that because he came right here and said that was why he was blocking me. We also know it because Rlevse went to WQA and said that was why he was blocking me. Rlevse did not go and make any such explanation at Wikipedia talk:Call a spade a spade. Rlevse did not go and make any such explanation at User talk:ArielGold Now, maybe I just missed it, but I don't think there is anything at Wikipedia:Blocking policy saying that the decision to block is something entirely at the administrator's whim, or that the administrator should Block now. You can always invent a reason for it later. or anything along those lines. So let's just stick with what is actually known and knowable about he reason for which I was blocked, the things that had been documented and recorded in our various histories here at Wikipedia before I was blocked. Anything else is irrelevant. Don't invent new reasons for a block. At the same time, don't say that the stated reasons for a block were not the reasons for it. For that matter, if Rlevse had wanted to take on that job, and had felt that there was something he wanted to teach me, he likewise could have tried to talk to me. He did not do so. If JzG had wanted to take on that job, he likewise could have tried to talk to me. But he took it one step further than Rlevse did; JzG did make a comment addressed to something I said, but then he blocked me to prevent me from responding to his own comment. 22:13 +"indicating an autoblock, please follow the instructions. talk " +" The nick has not been changed by any bureaucratic Username Change Request I can find, so my inclination would be he's either left Wikipedia, or is under a newly created account. Cheers, ✎ aka ""Wiz"" (Talk to Me) (Support Neutrality) " +Free yourself from Wikipedia! Are you tired of being bullied by narcissistic administrators on Wikipedea? Visit WeRNotWiki.proboards.com. +Glam Metal This section needs to be rewritten as it claims that it refers to the look and image of a band only and does not refer to the actual music. Glam Metal is pop influenced Hard Rock/Heavy Metal employing pop influenced catchy hooks and melody's with pop style chorus and pop production. +Vandalsim warning http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:After_wold_war_2_dokdo.jpg&diff;=150206992&oldid;=150185046 according to citation, not fishing line. and your edit is totally false. +GONE FISHING. +" If you want good edits then check out all the times that Fab Four deleted your lies from articles. Examples of youre lies? easy: Claiming Estonian SS was ""didnt have a politcle wing"" (Yeah, right, so they insisted to have the SS initials in their name because they liked the combination of the letters), claiming that the Estonian SS didnt kill any Jews (Thought the Estonians started the Holocaust in Estonia even before the Germans arrived their), and there was many other lies you wrote their, i just gave the to examples that came to my mind. M.V.E.i. " +" It'd have been better without the drama and name-calling.     talk  " +I stated Piketty said he had smoothed the figures which is in absolute accord with what Giles wrote, and what the Guardian wrote, NYT, WSJ etc. your insistence that I said what I did not say is tiresome. And I note that your seeming attempt to make this talk page entirely a set of ad homs is improper. +It seems to me you are already aware of what I think of your warnings, SS member. +Fuckin' hater, thats all you are. Honky, punk, bitch. Go troll Johny Cash or some shit, stupid. +"=Emails I got from arbcom before the block=== I decided to publish emails I got from arbcom before this block because of this statement made by Hersfold: ""Specifics of your harassment campaign have been covered in detail to you via email on a number of occasions"" is false (to say it nicely). I have never ever been emailed any ""specifics"" leave alone ""covered in detail"". I only was told that arbcom will not consider my request. Then I was advised to exercise my wp:RTV. When I refused, I was cowardly blocked. Here's the text of the first email from arbcom: Here's the text of the second email from arbcom: ==" +I thought it was appropriate +" Did Obama write all this hack job? Did Obama write this load of BS. I think Wakopedia is owned by George Soros and is secretively wants to have sex with Obama. What a hack job. I'm surprised Wakopedia didn't try to still tell the Anti-Muslim Video"" lie. Fact, Obama made a deal with his Muslim pals in the Muslim Brotherhood to let them kidnap Stevens so that he would be forced to trade him for the Blind Sheikh but Stevens was raped and killed instead. That is why Obama would rather have all America know that he is a incompetent scumbag then know the truth. OK go ahead and delete this truth since Wakopedia is all about lies and coverup. Maybe you should ban me that the same time to protect your want to be lover Obama.69.14.97.53 " +If you are curious about the issue it was discussed in detail and if reread can be quite an education on all facets of the issue - one of which is the non-RS status of IMDB, it is at best a secondary and supporting source. And yes it was also presented - the talk page was probably the most complete link farm on Earth regarding the Director of the 10 minute film. +" Pro-Ukrainian Protests? This Protests arent ""pro-Ukrainian"" they are pro-American or pro-Western. This conflict is a combination of a proxy war between the USA and Russia and an intra-Ukrainian civil war between Eastern and Western Ukranians.84.162.157.228 " +" November 2007 You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) " +Help me! Please help me with... 49.144.197.58 gallop +So, is The ECW Championship Considered World Title Status or Not? +Alright Whovians we need to work together Yesterday I tried starting a new category, Celebrity Whovians. However they were constantly deleted as most of them were not properly cited or irrelevant (hey if celebrity vegeratians is relevent enough for a category then so is celebrity whovians). So Whovians, we need to work together to make this category as big as the LGBT section, so those who contributed to the celebrity section I need to know the links (well I don't need to know those who keep deleting the section need to know) to where it states they are Whovians. Your fellow Whovian +"==A minor technical issue== The reference to Lysander Spooner's book ""Poverty: Its Illegal Causes And Legal Cure"" (currently reference #64) is producing a broken link. I don't understand why. Perhaps someone who knows how to do so can fix it and remove this segment from the talk page. I have put this at the top in anticipation of quick resolution. Archived discussion " +WorldNetDaily userbox I've created a WorldNetDaily userbox for Wikipedia. Just add the following code to your userpage: {{user:Evergreens78/Boxes/WND}} +Actions speak louder than words. His actions have been despicable. ∇∆∇∆ +AC Transit Bus fight Oops, you're right - that article does indeed pass the general notability guideline. That was a bit of a drive-by tagging, and a mistake. I'm still not 100% sure it should have an article on Wikipedia, but I'll take a closer look and think about it carefully before deciding whether to take it to AFD. In any case, you were right to remove the template. +It's alleged, not known. +, I'm glad I'm not the only one looking at this; I saw the latest series of edits this morning and they needed reverting too. The lack of communication doesn't help, of course. Thanks also for picking up the baton on the article and user talk pages, and bringing up the name issue. +" Sandy, that is another personal attack by you. Please do not presume to know what I know. You are the only person that tells me things ""a thousand times"", in a very harrasing and bullying way. Please stop. '''talk " +" Well there are more to come. If I can complete all of these articles, then I'll make a DYK out of each. Most I'll have to create. Some already exist but are low in characters so I'll have them expanded 5 times each. I also like Nikki's idea. I have the page on my watchlist, I forget which number we are up too, either in the late 70s or early 80s on DYKs. Well now, you are better off watching ROH's new show on HDnet. Here is a link to their new show: . That is the best wrestling going today. TNA lost all sense of direction. I hope they get back to their old ways, but now they seem like Raw. A crap load of promos and about 20 minutes of wrestling. Though last week's episode was very good. TNA are trying to raise the bar with Samoa Joe's new gimmick in which he gets himself DQed then beat the living hell out of the guy. Last week he hung a guy upside down by his feet and beat him like a pinata with a kendo stick. It was funny and great. Most hate it, since it is controversial, but I loved it. They need to raise the bar. Check it out if you want. They have a few good things going now but at the moment WWE are doing better. Hopefully after the storyline involving The Main Event Mafia and The Front Line in over, they'll go back to their old ways. Sting is supposed to retire this year. Angle might head back to WWE. If that is the case, then we'll get new blood in the main event. Sometimes I wish TNA would have never got Sting nor Angle, because since then TNA have been catering to them.C-Joe's gonna kill you!!!) " +Heads up, I did another Non-Admin Closure, as per your instructions (five days, unanimous Keep votes). Hope this one was okay: []. Thanks again! +Help with AfD Elliott Castro Help please: Elliott Castro. +Thx for LOL You are a steaming, shocking pile of dead bodies and crap. You speak lies upon lies. You bathe in your own filth, not by choice, but by default. You murder children. Flies gather from far away to land on your oozing bedsores. You are not worthwhile. You are not happy. Your words are tiny and your deeds are less. You are a waste of skin and atoms. The entropy you produce is inexcusable. Please stop living. The Illinois Nazis +" Streetcars in North America Your opinion of tables versus lists is noted. With some better explanation of your view then you might get my agreement. But simply stating ""For the record"" your total opposition just tells people that you un-collaborative. " +" Breast Cancer I thought the other two images were a bit graphic. While we are very much in need of pictures that describe the topic well, those images do not represent what breast cancer looks like for most women. Unless we want to go for a shock and awe effect, we'd be better off finding different images. T C " +Purus and the Dasarajna The Bharatas were also a part of the Puru tribe. King Sudas himself was a Puru. Please read http://www.chennaionline.com/festivalsnreligion/Articles/epicstory54.asp and UPDATE ON THE ARYAN INVSION DEBATE +" I am very well aware that newspaper articles have reported the height of the embankment, based on information released by TVA. If you will recall, I'm the one who has been reading these stories in my local newspaper and seeing them on the local TV news. This discussion was started not to discuss the height of the pond, but rather to discuss discrepancies between the pond's apparent dimensions and the reported size of the ash release. That's what I responded to. I am also extremely well aware that the material released was not ""coal sludge,"" but rather was fly ash, and that the article has continued to carry an inaccurate and misleading title because of your opposition to changing it. Has your continued attention to the details of the event given you a new perspective on the article name? " +Broner It's a fact, Broner made racist remarks on PPV, stop changing the truth. +5 suspension express in the Bronx Wait, I'm confused. The suspension in the Bronx of the 5 train express is suspended between East 180th Street and 3rd Ave- 149th St. The track work was completed? O:> +her is some info on the day that gose on in boulder creek school. first this school sucks the teachers +I am a Sikh scholar and a Khalsa, I've studied at Cambridge university & Guru Nanak Dev University and studied under the leading Sikh sant of Punjab there is nothing that says you can't have third name in Guru Granth Sahib I have have a third name and many of the Sikh Khalsa Scholars at the Golden temple have third names. Anyway please do not try to vandalise the site again otherwise I will a get administrator to block you for vandalism. +Joshua Raymond Hahn: WHOA, WHOA, WHOA! Should Kristen Bell and Dax Shepard are having a girl or a boy? +Thanks. And who is the motherfucker who nominated it for deletion? Well, let me guess... +" Homo floresiensis {{#if:| for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Thank you. " +", 3 July 2013 (UTC) ""I regret to inform you that Palestine only exists on some sort of theoretical level."" Sounds like Israeli propagandizer to me. Shameless and cowardly.24.224.214.165 15:31" +Hello? stop avoiding my question and i wil keep doing this untill u give me a straight forward answer also, you should be stripped form ur adminship due to the fact that from what i am seeing, you have been very corrupt. However, that is just a personal opinion. Basically what i am asking for is for you to answer my question yet you keep dodging it as if you are hiding something or you don't really care for wikipedia any more +" The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis and the Unbroken Continuity of Sinn Féin Poblachtach since 1905 The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership."" The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necess +" May 2015 (UTC) You say to add websources to the draft, but I thought the attempted pg. had died. Before starting to put it on the Wikipedia, I did Google a few items in the bio, and did get info on the The Harriette Ann Grey Concert Dancers, The Perry-Mansfield School of the Theatre (now using ""Perry-Mansfield Performing Arts School and Camp"" as I was informed this morn. by their archivist); The Pasadena Playhouse, and California Federal Theatre (1930s). If there is still a possibility for this page, do I add these websources or verifications of data offered, by mentioning their url? 15:33, 26" +the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. +":Wikipedia will obviously not claim Bush or whoever ""is"" the Antichrist, but it can very well report on common allegations. We have an entire (long) article about 9/11 conspiracy theories. Entire books and websites are dedicated to Bush as Antichrist, so the phenomenon is clearly notable enough for WP to report on it. (ᛏ) " +Hey, CambridgeBayWeather, quit being suck a fucking homo and get a fucking life instead of just sitting around and making sure nobody fucks with wikipedia. Fuck you, and quit editing MY page you fucking homo motherfucker. +Romar9124 Thanks for blocking this sock. I know admin can't block potential usernames from being used, but please keep an eye on similar usernames such as Romar9125 and Romar9126. As per MO, the puppetmaster would very likely use these usernames next. - | talkback | contribs +" Main Page By the way, if noone else told you, both the FS and FL proposals passed, and they'll be going on the main page ASAP, albeit with a pause in there for approval of the code. '''''' " +4) dirty everywhere, it stinks and smells bad. These people (with a lot of gypsy-bulgars) haven't discovered yet the soap and shampoo..or maybe it's too expensive. Bulgarian women also don't wash..:(( +Hell these policies, Kuru. +" Sorry friend, I didn't understand the massage. What fo you mean? • Talk2me" +Infobox has C&NWRy; drawings and spec sheets for their loco’s, that’s where most of this comes from. +CRS reports I apologise for removing your links. I made a bad call.- +Excuse me, why are you editing an article you know nothing about, and removing sources you aren't familiar with? Is this some kind of new editing style? I asked you to do research, and you still haven't done it! But you continue to talk about the subject...I'm sorry, but this makes no sense to me. +" Oh well! Coffee is obviously too ashamed to post the diff, so I will and I stand by every word of it. What a fucked up place this now is, when posting the truth earns a block. (talk) " +- Reliable sources have been posted, you just reject them because you have a problem with NPOV. Viewing your history shows you have a long record of clashing with anyone who wants to update the BNP page and you delete their material you don't agree with. For those interested in Snowded you can find him here: Dave Snowden. He is far-left wing and is biased (breaking NPOV) against editing the BNP. He also just just vandalised the ethnic nationalism page. +The best player in the NBA is +The properties of sums of infinite series, and the absence of infinitesimals from the standard reals, are by no means intuitively obvious; hence all the controversy about this small, but crucial result. +yeah i take your silence as you saying that I'm right, but you're too afraid to admit it +One or two.... yes, I gathered that from the article, but if two breeds are going to be described, or even one breed with different show standards, then surely the breed as it is maintained in its country of origin needs to be acknowledged first? It just seems like courtesy, to me! +" Response to Seite (following from the request on my talk page): you're attempting to apply a contemporary usage of a highly-charged and loaded term to a historical situation. Please read about the history of the Second World War, paying close attention to the scale, scope, and intensity of the actions of both sides as it drew to a close. Both sides used every weapon they had available in that colossal death-struggle. Nothing about the actions of either side is comparable in any way to ""terrorism"" in the common sense in which that term is used today. I would not even use the word to describe the Blitz, the bombings of Coventry, the destruction of Rotterdam, or even the ovens at Auschwitz. It's the wrong word. Once standard reference works on the Second World War use the word ""terrorism"" to describe those attacks, then we may cite it and use it; until then it is an original coinage, original research, and a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Thank you, (talk) " +protests and political events known as The Orange Revolution and subsequently +Great, thank you! +Since he has refused to justify his deletions and obtain consensus approval, I'll be reverting at will. Sorry if other people's changes get wiped out in the process, but this sort of collateral damage is typical when people like Tim decide to edit war to support their vandalism. +No attack. A question about the preceding polarized pattern of voting and appended comments, using metaphor, and a suggestion to consider policy and practice. Your notion of what constitutes attack is interesting. Asking is not accusing-it is a way of more politely requesting consideration of a new perception than a statement. Original research within our debate pages is healthy. Humour can help move a frozen debate toward consensus. Have you considered that your deletion of comments from other editors that you dislike on a page where you have previously expressed a vehement opinion on one side of a polarized debate may constitute a conflict of interest? Are you Sheriff John Brown? Am I Bob Marley?.(another metaphor) I am glad that debate brings you merriment and keeps Qwyrxian involved. Also, why are you going around describing me as an inactive editor as you did here? []?—  Talk/Stalk +Added Career section. +Sfacets reply to uber + The following conversation you will find on uber's talk page, it clearly shows he has personal agenda here, he calls other people idiots and now he has others against me, i do not care if all the world is against me, i can manage that, but he is the one who calls people idiots and more... + No Personal attacks + With regards to your comments on Talk:Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein#External_Links_.26_Spam.3F: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sfacets + + I only state the facts. Sorry. I dictate my External Links edits per Wikipedia's policy. ~ UBeR + Does the policy also cover calling other editors idiots? Comment on the edits, not the editor. Sfacets + I don't believe I ever called you an idiot. If I did, I apologize and will remove it. ~ UBeR + First of all, he did not apologize, second of all, again, he replied to sfacets (who i believe is an administrator) that he is just following wiki policy, no he is not, as simple as that. + Why should I waste any more of my time, the above is black and white. +Yeah, I didn't think I saw any of the Crow team get shot down until PJ, even on the nuclear detonations. If it could be confirmed, someone should change it. While on the subject of Crow, does anyone know the names of the first 2 pilots? +I already reinstated it in some way though. Extremely sexy +" FWIW - re your recent edit rv - Seems there's a substantial amount of material in the complete film documentary, ""Dawn of Humanity (2015 PBS film)"", that *directly* relates ""2001: A Space Odyssey"" to the recent discoveries of ""Homo naledi"" fossils in South Africa - the film documentary can be viewed, as a trailer (00:30), at => https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPpMIhmNRsA - or - as the complete film (113:07), at => http://video.pbs.org/video/2365559270/ Copied from ""Main Article - Version 13:49, 13 September 2015"": Influence on science The behavior of apes in the ""Dawn of Man"" sequence of 2001, largely influenced by the notions of Raymond Dart and dramatist Robert Ardrey, have been ""proven false"", since such violent apes have now been shown to be ""vegetarians"" instead, according to archeology expert K. Kris Hirst, reviewing the Dawn of Humanity (2015 PBS film) documentary which describes, directly in the context of 2001, the 2015 studies of fossils of Homo naledi. Comments by other editors are welcome of course - in any case - hope this helps in some way - Enjoy! ) " +" Not true! The actual issue was that you deleted ALL the links I added for him. That is the recap. The two other links worked fine, but you deleted them as well in your hurry to smash everything someone else did. In other words, you are the one who jumped to conclusions. Now you're trying to claim you only deleted the one that was a problem. Even your edit summary is wrong. The man's resignation was presented the same day I was adding the links, unknown to me, so it seems the Parliament link was being moved from current to former which caused pointer problems when I clicked on it. Things happen. It only needed to be fixed. I would have thought an Admin would be capable of figuring that out. Nor could you figure out how to leave a message on my Talk page so I could figure it out. You just couldn't wait to smash everything. I only came back to the article because I was going through the non-Cabinet people on the list. Did you fix that list, once you realized this was a former MP? No, you did not. That would have been ""work"", requiring ""thought"" and ""effort"". Same as you mis-corrected the hat note on the other John Carter MP. Based on your arrogance, I thought it likely you were an Admin. What a surprise, I was right. And Jimbo wonders why the numbers of actual contributors are going straight downhill. I have NO intention of continuing to contribute to Wikipedia because you obviously would prefer to do everything yourself. You're not at all welcoming, helpful, polite, assuming good faith, or anything else I was led to believe is part of the Wikipedia ethos. So I leave you to it. You didn't even have the grace to apologize for deleting the other links, you just tried to blame me in this audit trail. Go lecture someone else, because I'm out of here, and you can be sure I won't be encouraging anyone else to participate in what could have been a good project. Your attitude is horrendous, and I'm sure I'm not the first one you've chased out of here. Well, keep it up and you'll soon have the whole thing to yourself. Enjoy. Go brag to your friends that you got rid of another contributor. I'm sure you're very proud of yourself. " +William Shakespeare's life → William Shakespeare's late romances → William Shakespeare's plays → – Shakespeare is an English writer, uniquely considered to be the greatest writer in the English language, and in the English-speaking world including his given name whilst discussing any aspect of him and his work is unnecessary. Customarily the surname by itself is used to refer not only to the man, but his works. Most of these articles were started using the surname only, as per custom in the Shakespearean community, but several editors, unfamiliar with the topic and who almost exclusively edit with bots, misguidedly changed them. +If it all sounds like too much hassle, I also understand! +There is currently a mediation case involving Jacrosse's edits to the Neoconservatism article. You might check that out and talk with the head of the mediation people, +still missing something.... care to explain what just happened? i didnt do it on purpose, whatever it was... +" This is one of the best articles I've ever read on Wikipedia. It contains lots of sources about a ""k hole"" and reading it reminds me of previous experiences. With other drug trips, it's usually always different. With Ketamine, it's usually always the same. A ""k hole"" is the only way to describe it. And, since you have a major article on ketamine, describing it's main effect then warrants it's own article. I vote to keep this article. Don't delete an article about talking with god " +This should be a disambig page. There are 3 munros of this name and several lesser hills elsewhere in Scotland of the same name. +No apology in that of course! too much to expect...well where is the article on drug dynamization as of yesterday lost in cyberspace or what? OK Filll proceed and try to keep this wrecker on a short leash please Peter morrell +do you get some kinnda rise out of deleting peoples pages? you little nerd mess off +"::The NY Slimes a ""reliable source""?! Come on, give us all a break, will ya? 67.170.215.166 " +dudes change it how it was before some dude vandalized this, i tried to fix it by choosing a different version but doesnt help~~~~ +Jimmy Wang Yang His name is posted as Jimmy Wayne Yang... Oh and if you want prof go to smackdown than videos on wwe.com. They have the Jimmy Wang Yang Promo and it spells his name as Jimmy Wang Yang. +That sounds right given things have moved slowly or been delayed on that. If the Booster section grows a lot more, we can we put the ABC content in a separate subsection from the current 5 segment SRB for the Block I/IA/IB versions. - +"Who is this Parag Khanna. certain errors I noticed are, But ""India’s geography is at present geopolitically unfortunate because its ability to project power militarily is blocked by the Himalayan mountains, vast Indian Ocean.."" Blocked by Indian ocean? I find it interesting. Ocean's give a nation the only option of projecting power. India can only project power through the oceans. Also from his last interview, Nepal has become a democratic nation and the relation has improved better. " +" If you're going to cite the Newsweek piece primarily, how about including ""Little lady, if you think you have our respect, you don't. You have to earn it."" which speaks very clearly to support Palin's contention that she didn't feel he had his support? " +You are the one adding content, I am not. Feel free to bring it to WP:CP. Until then, this is getting tedious. hideliho! +" Éire/Ireland Hi, re: Éire/Ireland change in The Emergency, please see Talk:The_Emergency for my reasons for using ""Éire"" instead of ""Ireland"". Can you revert? Thanks " +Different cannabinoids are absorbed sometimes depending on the method of consumption, eating smoking etc. Also cannabinoids are lost when combusted. +User:CoolKatt number 99999 +"waste our time. If you have other reliable sources, present them. Moderate request Speedy Deletion In line with demands by other members, I request speedy deletion for an article which presents a community in a negative way. Further, comments by moderators such as 'situs' and 'Qwyrxian' may be noted and these moderators be suitably disciplined. There writer 'situs' is a paid write who geta paid to write articles witha certain intent. Wikipedia must take action against such persons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.109.201 There is no justification for deleting an article simply because someone doesn't like it. The subject is notable, and we don't " +Neither of those is a personal attack. The first you refer to, I repeat exactly what is said above, calling the person a VANDAL, which is exactly what they are. I'd say you are launching personal attacks upon me by claiming that I am attacking these people and spamming me with the No personal attacks template. Want a personal attack? FUCK YOU, you suck cock. How is that for a personal attack? The User on wikipedia, named All Star is a criminal who is wanted in 20 states for rape of children. There's another personal attack. There you go, and here I go, off to reset my router so that I am assigned a new dynamic IP, and should you decide to block my subnet for a few days again I'll just pop onto an open proxy. Frankly, you should stop being a fucking idiot with your warnings when i'm telling a spammer on wikipedia that his efforts have had a negative effect. Fuck you, your efforts have now had a negative effect, I'm off on a vandal spree using anon proxies for a bit, enjoy. 64.230.84.232 +" The creator of the ""Blade Element Theory"" is Stefan Drzewiecki and not the Wright Brothers. Tom Crouch, a pro Wright brother historian, claims the two US inventors realized that a propeller was in fact a rotating wing and that they discovered a method to design propellers (see 1). (1) ""The design of effective propellers presented a far greater challenge. The Wrights, who had initially hoped to learn from experience with ship propellers, discovered that little thought had been given to basic theory in this area. In another of their brilliant flashes of insight, the brothers reasoned that a propeller could be regarded as a rotary wing in which the lift being generated becomes the thrust that moves the aircraft forward. Knowing the number of revolutions per minute at which the propeller would be turning, they calculated the speed at which the blade would be moving at any point along its length and selected an appropriate airfoil from the tables developed during their wind tunnel tests. It sounds simple enough, but as Orville explained, ""on further consideration it is hard to find even a point from which to make a start, for nothing about a propeller, or the medium in which it acts, stands still for a moment."""", Tom Crouch, ""First Flight: The Wright Brothers and the Invention of the Airplane"", pag. 57, 2002, https://archive.org/stream/firstflightwrigh00crou#page/56/mode/2up However, the letter of Wilbur Wright to Octave Chanute (see 2) shows the two brothers had already been informed about the theory of Stefan Drzewiecki, before their alleged powered flight in Dec. 1903. (2) Letter of Wilbur Wright to Octave Chanute Dayton, July 2, 1903, ""My delay in writing you was chiefly due to a desire to first obtain a clear understanding of the Drzewiecki article on screws. [2] This author's methods of thought and expression are so different from my own that it has been no easy matter to master his paper. It shows a very clear understanding of some features of the question, but as the author seems unacquainted with negative tangential, and with the effect which weight of water acted upon by each part of the screw has in fixing the angle of incidence, the paper leaves much to be desired as a complete discussion of the subject. I am quite certain that his method of constructing a screw of uniform angle of incidence will not give the result intended. The speed imparted to the water by suction before the screw actually has a chance to strike it is also ignored; and no method of calculating the loss from this source is given. Some of his conclusions seem to Orville and me to be rank heresy, but of course we are like the theologians and judge the ""soundness"" or ""unsoundness"" of others by the closeness of their agreement with ourselves."", Source: http://invention.psychology.msstate.edu/inventors/i/Wrights/library/Chanute_Wright_correspond/1903/Jul2-1903.html (3) ""[2] Stefan Drzewiecki, born in 1844, was the originator of the blade element theory of screws, which considers the blades of a screw as being composed of an infinite number of aerofoil sections. The blade element theory, together with the momentum theory of Froude and Rankine, is almost universally used today to explain the action of aerial screws. In 1900, Drzewiecki presented a paper, ""Des Helices propulsives,"" to the Congres d'Architecture et de Constructions Navales in Paris. In 1901, a second paper by him, ""Du Choix des elements determinant les helices propulsives permettant leur facile comparaison entre elles,"" was published in the Bulletin de l'Association Technique Maritime (no. 12, 1901). The papers were reprinted in Paris in 1900 and 1901 respectively. It is not known which of the two Chanute sent to the Wrights."", Source: http://invention.psychology.msstate.edu/inventors/i/Wrights/library/Chanute_Wright_correspond/1903/Jul2-1903.html These two brothers were ignorant people, they made fun of Drzewiecki in front of Chanute, and finally, in 1908 when they flew in France and US in front of witnesses, started to claim the theory of this Polish scientist as their own. Historians, like Tom Crouch, who do not have any technical background, simply believed the two brothers and propagated this false information around the world." +" Oh, yeah. I never said to remove the mention of glam, but I wondered if anyone was familiar with the cited ref; if we have, in fact, a reliable source, we should use it. I also felt that ""chiefly glam"" should be removed. •talk• " +" Well, that's not going to happen because, as you'll find out, Wikipedia isn't exactly the most objective source on recent historical events; you'll find more opposition there in that article than there is support. Dark Liberty " +I don't care what you consider, Nev1. Please find something to do that doesn't involve harassing people. Cheers +" Mathematical descriptions of physical laws I didn't get round to saying thanks for sorting that article out. A year later, after learning more physics and maths, I realize how atrociously incorrect my efforts were for that article. I'm happy you merged into it into laws of science, and those edits for that article were definitely an improvement. You have my support for merging scientific law into laws of science, there are a number of these ""laws of nature/science/physics"" articles which could do with some unification (!). By all means leave physical law alone though. Also thanks for at least being decent enough to improve the list of physics equations article in the process of merging, even though you ironically dislike that article. Don't worry too much about the length - Maxwell's equations is ~ 109kB with a lot of repetition. Best, " +shut the fuck up dont worry about the khalsa. the khalsa does not need your approval. the khalsa does not live in your world. do your fucking work, this is fucking wikipedia, the game is much bigger than this you rat. +. I'm worried about messing with it too much at this point +" They always will be, a history of conquest and assimilation, hard won independence and also strong opposition from people who want Britain to be Britain (not Welsh, or Scottish etc.). My grandmother (yes that close) was thrashed for speaking welsh in the playground of her school (an experienced mirrored in First Nation people in your country) and a culture was almost wiped out at the time. Those things are within living memory so advocates of ""we are all British really"" will get a strong response. Same on the Irish pages where memories of cultural assimilation are also strong (and of Cromwell for that matter. I remember being on civil rights marches in Belfast in the 60s as catholics did not have a vote, something a lot of people forget or don't know (and still have the scars of B-special brutality from that). I could go on, but its not an academic issue for many editors, it is their lived reality and history. TALK " +" is.]] Yoda says: ""Nonsense, Sei (soon to be) International is. 03:07, May 20, 2005 (UTC)" +Okay I understand. Thank you. +Many thanks! I think this cuts the Gordian Knot! +" I'm sorry, are you the director, writer or producer of the film? Are you solely in charge of this page? Have you seen this movie? The actors listed on the SIDE> of a film's page are listed according to billing. Any actors in the film can be listed on the film's cast list on the page. (see ANY film's page on Wikipedia) so I don't understand how you think that other actors in the film are not ""notable"" when they appear in the film in prominent roles. The whole first half of the movie is Young Philomena played by Sophie Kennedy Clark. You don't have have the actor listed who plays her son, when the movie is about...Philomena finding her son. I will be adding the cast back to the list and do not remove them. I only added a few more actors that have prominent screen time, not every actor billed on IMBD. " +" So, a serious question... How can I get my billion or so addresses for my small business? Is there any way for me to allocate IPv6 addresses to my colocated server? -T-C " +http://indianmilitarynews.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/indian-army-rape-us.jpg Indian kids trying to rape my user page ( 86.182.174.123 +My hard work Why? Why you want destroy my hard work? Who are you? +" I can't believe it! This story of how they got their doctor degree has been discussed before, and agreed upon, a long time ago. That was before EE guy time but anyway, the same on different forums, and not earlier than this august month. And to clear out all doubts, thought it is a far out dream, and as Igor has already pointd it out a few articles above, which mean only a few hours before you came with your extract, mention honorable is a very honorable mention who is seldom given to a thesis and mean that the work is considered as being very good. Do you get it now? Or shall we absolutely repeat this, let say, 1000 times before it get in to the correct part of your brain system? This being already a repetition. But if you were less eager to get all your informations on that matter at the same source:YBM own edits and promotion web side, it will help a lot. I have already in august presented the prooves that the article you use above as a proof is nothing but a homemade text created by ybm who has absolutely no knowledge of the doctorat point system or who did it on purpose. Both well cooresponding to ybms' untrustworthy selvmade image. Yourself could get some indormations about this fact, instead of echooing what you read like ""I knew it too and agreed"" when in fact all of those data are rants without contact to reality. Shall I sign zorro or shall I put your own name? afterall what the hell shall I have my own signature when anyway it is freely accused for being another one at anytime and for anything? Get your vocabulary straight, your source of information straight, and give me a well deserved excuse for all the numerous timessssss where you have insulted me. I make progress happen, you sylte on it like a parasite and want a medailj for it? Get real, you are at best paparazy, at worse a middle levelheaded ingeneeer trying his joker on wiki. " +Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipple Nipp +Shut the !@#$%^&* up! +Military rank 'On leaving Eton in 1942, he joined the Coldstream Guards as a Captain...' How did he get straight to Captain? +" Luxury box () sounds . Mid (contributions) " +"I've studied neurology basics, and it is difficult for me to decide which one, perhaps it is micture of both, un and sub consciousness. Let me point to the typical as I think mode of tailgaters (I only guess because I am not one) so called ""autopilot"" when one switch off and focus only on the stop light of the car in front. This can be observed in cases when locked on to the tailgating mode, all other lanes are free to move and drive faster even within limit and surely free of obstacle of slower cars in front, but those drivers on autopilot persist and do not notice of the opportunity to change lane. Often they do tailgate for a long distance without changing lane which is free for some time and only when you decide to do so or come from behind, they come suddenly in front of you. This is partially subconscious. Our peripheral vision is sensitive to movement, their brain register this, they immediately notice that the object they notices (you) moves on or into free lane, they make immediately reactive rather than fully conscious and rational decision and they move dangerously in front of you. I believe that if they drove not on autopilot, they would long before you decided and changed lane. I believe that such sub/un counscious behavior is a result of poor driver training. Proper training enable much better and counsious decisions and faster. " +BONGWARRIOR WHY YOU GOTTA HATE +" Sorry about this PS: I regrettably don't have ""The Amazonian Languages"", of which Dixon was coeditor, and where he wrote the chapter about the Arawá languages, and cowrote (with Alexandra Aikhenvald) the chapter about ""Other Small Families and Isolates"". But I do have his Australian languages. If you want it, all you have to is send a mail to arinbjornhersir@gmail.com. I'll then create a Dropbox folder for you. If you do want anything else, I'll perfectly willing to share. I have a good collection of books in the field of Indo-European linguistics. Just say yes or no, and If you have any wishes, I'll try to fulfill them. (History, linguistics, Physics, Mathematics, it's all there.) How's that for an olive branch? -) " +" We cannot ""use another synonym"", as we, the editors, have no authority in applying any kind of terminology to historical events. This constitutes WP:OR. I have no idea what you mean by ""explaining the chronology of events""; the point is that there is no third-party assessment of the event as ""reprisal"" or ""retaliation"", which means you are making it up, which means it should not be on Wikipedia. " +The Handbooks were published for gullible fans by a greedy comic book company. All we need to know is that these characters are superhumanly strong; who is stronger is up to the writer and the needs of the story. +" A philosophical story to embrace ones mind. The ancient Indian mathematicians were the first to discover the digit zero ""0"" and implement it in the formation of digits. The whole world revolves like a cycle in the form of the digit zero. The Britishers dicovered an ancient egg of Dinosaures in India. What I mean to convey is that: India is the land where Lord Rama or Lord Krishna were born. Lord Rama was an example of a perfect ideal man on earth. His life story is an example for an ideal man to follow. Lord Rama, Lord Lakshmana, Lord Bharata and Lord Shatrughana were four sons of King Dhasratha of Ayodhya. He was cursed to die from the pain of separation from his son by the blind parents of Shrawan Kumar. Kaikeyi the mother of Bharata wishes to send Lord Rama on an exile for a period of 14 years and wishes her son Bharata to be the King of Ayodhya. Lord Rama and his wife Sita and his brother Lord Lakshmana leave for forests outside the kingdom of Ayodhya. Lord Rama's brother Lord Bharata persuades lord Rama to return back but lord Rama refuses to return to Ayodhya against the wishes of his step mother Kaikeyi. But Lord Bharata returns to Ayodhya along with the sandals of lord Rama and places the sandals of his brother Lord Rama on the throne and rules the kingdom of Ayodhaya in the name of Rama. This shows the example of love between an elder brother and his younger brother. In the forest once a demon shurpanaka sister of King Ravana disuades Lord Rama to marry her, but Lord Rama tells her that he is already married and points towards his brother Lord Lakshmana who cuts off her nose and ears to show her ugly nature and character. Shurphanaka runs off and complains about Lord Rama and Lord Lakshamana to King Ravana of Lanka. King Ravana somehow manages to kidnap Goddess Sita the wife of Lord Rama in revenge to Lanka. Lord Rama grieves for his separation from his beloved wife Goddess Sita. Here the feelings of an ideal person in the form of lord grieving from separation from his beloved wife are beautifully described by Sage Valmiki who wrote the whole Ramayana. Sage Valmiki was a thief named Ratnakar who by the japam of Lord Sri Rama became a great sage named Valmiki and wrote a great epic called Ramanaya the story of King Rama and Sita. Lord Rama and Lord Lakshamana move towards southern India where they meet the lord Hanuman, (the great son of Anjani and Kesari; Lord Hanumanji is also known as Pavanputra or the great celibate bachelor) and Lord Sugriva and with the help of vanara sena or Army of Monkeys they move into the kingdom of Lanka and kill the demon king Ravana. Lord Rama rescues Goddesses Sita and with the help of Lord Hanuman they return back to Ayodhya. A fourteen years had lapsed when lord Rama had left the kingdom of Ayodhya. When lord Rama, Goddesses Sita, Lord Lakshmana and lord Hanuman return to Ayodhya, the people of Ayodhya cheer up and lit up the whole Ayodhya with Diyas in order to celebrate the victory and return of their king Lord Rama. The festival Dusherra is celebrated every year as a victory of good over evil as the demon Meghanad {the son of King Ravana},the demon Kumbhakarna {the brother of king Ravana} and the demon King Ravana of Lanka were killed by Lord Rama and Lord Lakshmana in order to rescue Goddesses Sita from her captivity in Lanka. And on the occassion of their return to Ayodhya the festival Diwali is celebrated throughout India every year with great pomp and show of lights and crackers. Whenever some troubled minds read this story of Ramayana their minds gain peace and the self confidence is restored as their spirits become calm, pacified and brave in the troubled periods of time. The Epic Ramayana denotes the greatness of Supreme God Lord Rama as an ideal human being on earth. " +" Proposing renaming and new article draft Over the last couple of months I have produced a new draft of this article, working on behalf of New Leaders. The organization asked me to write an updated draft, better reflecting their new name and current programs and bringing the article into line with Wikipedia's guidelines. The most immediate issue with the current article is that the title is now incorrect. The organization has recently been renamed to ""New Leaders"" and is now no longer ""New Leaders for New Schools"". Due to this change, I believe that the article should be renamed. I recognize that since I prepared my draft on behalf of New Leaders, I have a conflict of interest. So, before I make any changes, I'd like to ask that other editors read through my draft and my explanation here, and offer any feedback they might have. There are a number of problems with the current article, not least that it is rather promotional in tone. It seems that this has attracted the attention of editors in the past, as you can see from the warning tag. However, despite the warning tag, and the discussion that was opened by NDSteve10 on the Talk page (see above), there hasn't really been any improvement to the article in the last 12 months. No editors responded to the Talk page note, and only a few edits have been made. In fact, little has changed with the article since it was originally created in December 2009. The article currently has few citations, less than half of which are reliable secondary sources. The introduction doesn't adequately summarize the article, and certainly does not give a real sense of what New Leaders does. The most problematic sections are What it does and Educational impact, both of which are written in a promotional tone, especially the latter. In addition, the ""What it does"" section is outdated, since the organization has since introduced new programs and initiatives. Meanwhile, the ""Educational impact"" section provides a lot of detail, but would be better presented using Wikipedia's summary style. The information provided is cited to New Leaders' website, but makes no mention that the source of the claims is the organization itself. I would like to propose a new draft of the article that addresses the issues with the current version, which you can view in my userspace:User:16912 Rhiannon/New Leaders This is an entirely re-written article, using reliable secondary sources as much as possible, with new section headings to provide readers with a sense of the content at a glance, a new introduction which properly summarizes the article, and an infobox with all the key information about the organization fully up to date. The ""Creation and history"" section now includes details of the organization's founding and expansion up to the present day. The descriptive information about New Leaders' has been removed, as this is more relevant in the new ""Function"" section. The information from the current ""What it does"" and ""Educational impact"" sections has been rewritten under a new section heading of ""Function"", which includes the organization's mission, its programs and its results. This section provides details of all the organization's current initiatives and an overview of the impact of these programs. I have retained the sections on ""Geographic reach"" and ""Executive team"", but updated the information in each and added citations. While I have put much effort into writing this from a neutral POV, I appreciate that due to my COI it may be that other editors have some changes to suggest. I welcome any productive feedback on the draft and my suggestion to rename the article to New Leaders. Please let me know if you have any thoughts or questions. Thanks, " +Thanks Eeekster I don't know how to use Wikipedia very well, I just know this is an important movie (Mind Polish) to have listed here. All I ask is that you leave the external link as the link to the trailer. Thanks for your help! +April 2006 (UTC) You allopaths took it upon yourselves to ban links to whale, which you call an 'approved RFC outcome'-I'd like to see the actual wording regarding that, so SHOW ME THE DIFF on that. Your only argument was ad hominem, which isn't an argument in case you hadn't noticed. You can't use that argument with Vaccination.org.uk as it doesn't have any conspiracy stuff on it. 09:01, 2 +Arabesque Can we please tie up the Arabesque discussion. ( ) +Major reorganization and rewriting I think that this page is in needs of a major overhaul in order to improve its quality. To me the following steps are required: 1)Discussing a new name 2)Updating the Lede and the infobox 3)Expanding the background 4)Reorganizing the later categories (informative titles better than montly titles) 5)Searching for typos and grammar 6)Regrouping daily news into coherent paragraphs. I suggest for the moment to keep all information and after all these steps are done we could discuss dividing into sub-pages or removing less relevant or reliable content. +robJ1981@hotmail.com (my MSN messenger name: no active email though), we can talk there. Otherwise, do you use IRC? There's no need to create a new email address if we don't need to. +moooovvvvvveeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrr fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeeer why the hell did you block oliver hacker pro imbisil +Hateful mod abusing his power to re-edit. i guess as long as you make the blanket statement (i don't think your edits were right, i didn't check but im lazy so i'll just delete it) you can delete what you want. it's a shame that the mods don't stop a single person who actively tries to destroy an entire section of wikipedia by putting legit articles up for deletion. i guess you guys are trolling friends who troll like this all the time. instantly fucking up legit edits like mine just because you don't have a real life. sad, very pathetically sad. +told them their voices will be heard in the ArbCom if they wished to leave comments there. I +illegal filesharing? Can someone explain me why megaupload's DMCA-abiding file sharing service is being taken down, but the nearly identical SkyDrive (by Microsoft) isn't? What's the catch aside from microsoft owning more lawyer-power than some entire american states? I won't comment on in the main page without a little fact-finding talk. +", 9 September 2009 (UTC) Purrum, get the story accurate rather than make more false allegations about Opas. You are trying to confuse the ""facts"", as per usual. Truth is, Opas wrote many articles, which have always clearly stated the ""facts"" - that only one single shot was heard by all persons and prison officer Paterson testified he fired one single shot. Also, prison officer Pascoe admitted on national television in 1986 (19 years after Ryan was hanged) that he fired a shot from tower 3, which might have killed Hodson. Pascoe stated that he was a young scared coward at the time for keeping quiet as he didn't want to get into trouble and lose his job. Hence, there has been much speculation over the decades of where the fatal shot was fired from, and by whom. The ""fact"" remains that the police and prosecution failed, for whatever reason, to provide a shred of scientific forensic evidence, which would have proven beyond reasonable doubt who's rifle fired the fatal shot. Nobody's rifle was ever tested. There were lots of prison officers with lots of rifles at the time everyone heard one single shot. Not one single rifle, including Ryan's rifle, was tested for evidence. This is a ""fact"". Purrum should stick to the ""facts"" rather than contribute opinions, views, allegations without substance. 07:52" +Unblock This template was on this user's user page...I just moved it here. 124.181.26.71 +Its not what i think is correct! Its facts! Its from me Donny long which you can even see I posted it on my blog donnylong.com with facts to back them up. I have emailed info-en-q@wikimedia.org and many other email address's at wiki corp. I dont have time for these games anymore. +'suffering from recintism' and keeping articles current are different. wikipedia is not your utopian ideal for how an enyclopedia should be...it serves a purpose and provides information for people who are searching for it. if you put 'john g roberts' into google i imagine this article is one of the top 2 entries. when people search that name right now, what do you think they are looking for? burying this information deep in the article is doing all of those people a huge disservice, because you think that 'recintism' is bad. +Possible reference The following seems useful, but I can't access it at the moment: +^^^WP:Etiquette in its finest form... +Where is this phantomatic indigeneous gayreek population??? Bring your sources gayreek| Of course, gayreek sources do not count. I see only three gayreek authors, Pentzopoulos, Nitsiakos and Mantzos, . For as much as I know, you might be one of them. Gayreek, your agenda has become clear, it is a Megali idea ultaranationalist agenda. Gayreek, after ethnically cleansing Chamerea, where do you find the moral courage to clain other Albanian land?? Do me a favor gayreek, spare me your lectures. I can find it myself, what should I read and why should not. Gayreek, stop the edit warring, for I will never give up. I know I can not protect all the articles from Gayreek Fascism, cause it takes time, but at least I can concentrate on this one of Gjirokastra and protect it for as much as I have life. +You're a fucking moron. Go read the notability guidelines. 62.106.48.40 +" Ross Macfadyen II Not sure how this works! I have posted a biog on the above page. There are indeed two ross Macfadyen's on the wireless in Glasgow, Scotland. I have also included my work for the National Autistic Society with relevant links. Can you specify what i need to do to make the item ""notable""?" +" While the idea that the UK is the instigator of the war is delightfully odd, the OP does have a point - the article briefly alludes to the existence of earlier bombing (first para, ""Change of strategy"") but never explicitly mentions it. However, the official history does explicitly connect the August raids to the start of the Blitz, even if they weren't the sole reason: It would, of course, be too much to see in these raids on Berlin the whole cause of Hitler's next move; but they unquestionably added to his anger at the activities of Bomber Command. it would not be long now before D-day. What better policy, then, for this final phase, than to enjoy a swift and sweet revenge by hurling the Luftwaffe in force against London. For if the British capital could be reduced to chaos, the task of the invading armies would be enormously simplified (...) 'The British', he screeched, 'drop their bombs indiscriminately and without plan on civilian residential quarters and farms and villages. For three months I did not reply because I believed that they would stop, but in this Mr. Churchill saw a sign of our weakness. The British will know that we are now giving our answer night after night. We shall stop the handiwork of these night pilots.' Three days later, on 7th September, the Luftwaffe abandoned its offensive against the sector stations and began the assault on London. From the point of view of winning the battle, Dowding himself could not have made a more satisfactory decision. (pp. 182-183) Omitting to mention the British bombing through August, and the theories of a ""revenge for Berlin"" motive, seems a bit strange. " +Blog is Flimsy How flimsy can a blog that actually cites an interview participated in by the homophobe be? Dallin has stated numerous times how he felt about mormonism in that annotated interview. +I always find it hard to know what to do in cases like this. Basically, it looks like he is acting like a bit of a dick, but it's difficult to say that there is anything you can do at this stage, until the stalking gets worse. (talk) +You clearly weren't here for the Hagler fan edit war a couple weeks ago. +uhm, funny to see all this. y'know, this is a dynamic IP, blocking it for >24h will just hit other people, we (customers of versatel deutschland) have a forced ip change after being connected for 24h. += Stub |listas = Stevenson, William (judge) +You're correct, multiple editors have told me to stop...but not a single editor has copied and pasted the exact rule/policy/regulation that they perceive that I have violated. I've read the entry on personal attacks and the entry on harassment and did not find anything that was even remotely relevant to my behavior. That's because my behavior has focused ENTIRELY on what the editors have been doing...and NOT on who the editors are as people. So if you're concerned with my behavior...if you don't like the path that I'm going down...then it would be extremely helpful if you could copy and paste the specific policy that you feel matches my behavior. Because as it stands, you've been entirely unhelpful. And by that I mean that I have NO idea whether you believe that there is a specific rule that states that I'm not allowed to refer to your actions as unhelpful. +I do not care to hear anything else you have to say so please do not post messages in my talk page. I will remove them. +The article Mudbug band has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Revertion of comments about 1985 Wyatt expeditions - dowsing device Since one of my friends disappeared in mysterious circumstances, leaving his tent and personal effects behind, from an expedition while investigate a Noah's Ark hoax, I bring a certain need for academic or even journalistic accuracy to the subject. In particular, I have become aware of evidence about the device used in the 1985 Wyatt survey - and had posted a critical comment - with supporting links to Creation Magazine. This was reverted without comment - see history. Since these facts are now widely accessible on the internet how can the redactors of this page justify leaving the article giving half the story of the 1985 Wyatt expedition? 82.132.222.244 IMC newby 25 Sept 2013 +What is Blake doing these days??? What is Blake doing these days? I thought I read somewhere that he was living in single quarters on some ranch and working as a ranch hand. I was suprised not to see any mention in this bio of what he is doing. My guess???: it was probably put in this bio but some busybody took it out. I don't have the time to go read through all the busybody deletions to see what he is doing. Does anybody know what he is doing? +"Moynihan says in his Chairman's Forward, ""President Truman was almost willfully obtuse as regards American Communism."" " +Wiki Miki rox sox off +Note: the above warning is baseless and the user appeared to have given it based on a content dispute. Thank you. |heru|nar +I think thats similar because One Night Only is a series of monthly ppvs, like IYH, but taped. +I was looking over WP policies and was wondering what policy are you sighting cause to delete this article? +What is wikipedia nd censorship about? Its about its users and editors. And at the moment its users should go for morality and good concensus. Censorship was not an inflexible divine law to herd and abuse the people in the name of law. +" The issue is not the ""source,"" it is the ""article."" Closure dates need to be presented according to well-established practice in English-language articles (and reference materials): the last day on which service operated. In this case, Japanese practice (there is ""more to it"" than just ""the day from which services no longer run"") is not germane to how information is presented in the English article. " +Do you think that should be in the article at all. +Merge of County articles I will be proposing that all the County articles in England be merged into several articles, representing the 9 official regions of England. This involves the following articles:- Cleveland Scout County (The Scout Association)Durham Scout County (The Scout Association) Northumberland Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in North East England covering North East England. Cumbria Scout County (The Scout Association) Cheshire Scout County (The Scout Association) East Lancashire Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater Manchester East Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater Manchester North Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater Manchester West Scout County (The Scout Association) Merseyside Scout County (The Scout Association) West Lancashire Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in North West England covering North West England. Central Yorkshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Humberside Scout County (The Scout Association) possibly part of Lincolnshire Scout County (The Scout Association) North Yorkshire Scout County (The Scout Association) South Yorkshire Scout County (The Scout Association) West Yorkshire Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in Yorkshire and the Humber covering Yorkshire and the Humber. Derbyshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Leicestershire Scout County (The Scout Association) Lincolnshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Northamptonshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Nottinghamshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Rutland Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in East Midlands covering East Midlands. Birmingham Scout County (The Scout Association) City of Coventry Scout County (The Scout Association) Hereford and Worcester Scout County (The Scout Association) Shropshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Staffordshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Warwickshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Solihull Scout County (The Scout Association) West Mercia Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in West Midlands covering West Midlands. Bedfordshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Cambridgeshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Essex Scout County (The Scout Association) Hertfordshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Norfolk Scout County (The Scout Association) Suffolk Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in East of England covering East of England. Greater London Middlesex West Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater London North Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater London North East Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater London South Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater London South East Scout County (The Scout Association) Greater London South West Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in Greater London covering Greater London. Royal Berkshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Buckinghamshire Scout County (The Scout Association) East Sussex Scout County (The Scout Association) Hampshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Isle of Wight Scout County (The Scout Association) Kent Scout County (The Scout Association)Oxfordshire Scout County (The Scout Association) Surrey Scout County (The Scout Association) West Sussex Scout County (The Scout Association) merged toScouting in South East England covering South East England. Avon Scout County (The Scout Association) Cornwall Scout County (The Scout Association) Devon Scout County (The Scout Association) Dorset Scout County (The Scout Association) Gloucestershire Scout County (The Scout Association) Somerset Scout County (The Scout Association) Wiltshire Scout County (The Scout Association) merged to Scouting in South West England covering South West England This is in accordance with the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting#Structural changes UK. The idea is to use the 12 regions defined by the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics shown in the image on the right that shows the 9 regions of England, to which Wales, Scotland and Northern Island are added. This process is completed fo +Apology Scarian, i would like to apologize for appearing as though i was trying to harass you, i'm just now getting the hang of how to communicate/ reply to other users, with that said and hopefully cleared up, i still can't say i found it right to revert my edit on the AC/DC page because it appears you either never heard of them at all, or know little about them, since the song i noted they performed at that particular concert, Big Balls was an actual song, and one of their most known, which is why i jump to the assumption. Even though you unfairly reverted my noting of what song they were playing when the picture was taken, i'm not going to attempt to edit anymore, nor will i make anymore trouble, or at least knowingly. If i do infact do something do whatever you feel is appropriate. In the meantime, could you or an equally responcible and courteous admin or whatever you are please message me some detailed directions on how to communicate better? +maybe you must no give me contact. maybe i give my contact? we fight for no croatia together. ok? serbin fihgter +" Stop vandalizing the fricken page, then we'll listen to what you have to say. @ " +You represent gross incompetence in maintaining the wikipedia. +":SilkTork, I struck some comments on Fainites. Please point me to others that shoudl be struck, as I cannot find them. — (Talk) " +" You did, but not for the better. Not NPOV and barely readable, thanks to poor construction and grammar. As for the ""quite well done"" claim above, well, hardly. Optimism and over statement, here or by the Citizendians, is no substitute for useful content. The battle for that was lost long long ago. CZ is an all-but empty bucket, poncing about the place under a clunkingly poor inexpert page design, with utterly glacial progress, mired in an undending barrage of high sounding committee babble." +Tombstone photograph That's really a great (and sad) photograph, what with the snow on top. We see that Terry pre-deceased his father, and his inscription looks like a footnote. +Warning has been issued to user. +" Deletions Please Could I get the pages made by this user deleted? One is a blantant hoax (tagged as such) and one is a blatant copy of another page to Swq (tagged as such). If you could delete them, it would be appreciated. Thanks... • Talk • " +User:NawlinIcky Thanks for the heads-up. The Anome has got there before me with an indefinite block, so it should be resolved now. talk +Sure it does, I gave reliable resources. Also, it is important because it gives you some good websites to download games and that website easily stands out from the crowd making it SIGNIFICANT. +I'll play nice when people who don't know what they're talking about stop running their mouths and stop reverting my edits. We're talking about removing a single unnecessary word. That's it. You people are ridiculous. +" This is not the right page to request additional user rights.If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form ""Please replace XXX with YYY"" or ""Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ"".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request. - " +" Hello I noticed that you have wrote on my talk page. I do know the user McFly85 personally. We both were in a computer lab checking out wikipedia one time and we talked about how the quality of certain areas of articles were a little lacking. He also told me about his tattered history on wikipedia, where he had his user page edited, without consent, by SWD316/Moe Epsilon. Then, someone else vandalized SWD316's user page, and put the blame on mcfly, which I'm fairly sure he would not do. Mcfly did make a few other accounts during a RFA as he was worried that if SWD316 would be given moderator powers, that he would be unfairly banned. And if you look at Mcfly85's edit history, he has made a wealth of good edits, mainly proofreading issues, but also a lot with NPOV, stub sorting, and even creating an article every once in awhile. In my opinion, even with all the alleged sockpuppet abuse, mcfly85 has been a strong asset to wikipedia. If it wasn't for this user, as lot of previous errors and formatting mistakes would have gone unnoticed, and would harm the quality of this site. He had no intention of becoming a moderator, but always intended to improve, even if only slightly, any article that was lacking quality. I feel bad that the actions of Moe Elipson have pretty much caused mcfly, my friend, to lose trust in this site and he has since retired his name. He did come back under another name, and made some great edits, but then, was unfairly (IMO) banned for being a 'sockpuppet used abusively"". There is a difference between being a sockpuppet and trying to use a new name to get a fresh start. But I am not mcfly85. I am fairly new to being a serious editor on wikipedia, and I was just checking some various parts of the site. I then noticed on the RFAs section that this familiar name came up, and I saw mcfly's screenname in the questions answered by Moe Elpison. I really didn't want other users have what happened to mcfly happen to them, so I voted opposed, which I am allowed to do as a user. I do not feel that I ""unfairly influenced"" the voters, I think the voting results would have been the same weather I had voted or not. And I have never heard of Araxen, and I did not create or am involved with that user. That vote should not have counted. I just wanted to explain my case to you. I also question that Moe Elipson's user page may be in violation of the no personal attacks policy. He calls McFly85 some very harsh names, such as a stalker. I think that content that bashes other users should be removed, there is no place for that anywhere. But thanks for asking, I hope to keep making solid contibutions to the encyclopedia, it's a fun hobby. " +It is well known MANY people have MANY wikipedia accounts so cut the crap and please do not waste everyones valuable time with this nonsense Tenebrae. You and I, as well as everyone IN THE ENTIRE WORLD knows you are simply trying to control unfavorable information from reaching wikipedia pages and the masses. The simple and plain truth is that the information posted is ALREADY ATTACHED TO THE ARTICLE IN THE SOURCE FILE and it is merely an inconvenience for yours and others personal agenda. Lets keep it real, ok Tenebrae? Come back when truth is on your side. And can you stop being so angry, it seeps out of your words like puss out of an infection, when dealing with a newbie to wikipedia? +(User:Apoc2400 for example. There isnt any compromise to be reached as the view is now unanimously a Keep. +"Nothing of the kind== I sought a considered determination, not a defensive, opinionated and punitive reflexive response from this immature cult of wikipedia ""geeks"". The ""processes"" of Wikipedia seem to me so much rubbish. So it's good luck to you all. ==" +WTF Why you deleting my posts asshole!! Stop hating and just leave them alone. Get a life son +" The problem is, every time anyone edits the article per this discussion, manages to revert it and make no coherent effort to talk it out. " +" Here is what you have written about this peer reviewed journal and I quote ""Just because a journal is peer-reviewed etc does not implicitly give it the kudos to be used by us"". So before removing any article/source, read it and get it reviewed from others and then decide whether to remove it or not. No matter even if the study is old ABO blood grouping still exists and this study was based upon very sound scientfic experiment of ABO blood grouping. I do not see any reason that why a scientific study which provides info about the link of Sainis had to be removed." +11 November 2008 (UTC) +History of the Eastern Roman Empire This article was created based on a discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roman_Empire/Archive_5#Resolving_the_Roman.2FByzantine_mess. The current text was taken from Byzantine Empire#History (the section there should be reduced in time). +Bullshit anon, you don't quarter troops in civilian areas, that is a violation of the GC's. The GC applies in this case and every other one involving the terrorists. +" So circa means 1 January 1926 – 31 December 1928? I'd say around conveys greater precision than that precise imprecision. (talk) " +PLEASE STOP VANDALISING MY USER TALK PAGE +Light my fire Thanks for being thorough. I have now added more specific refs for Larry Knechtel. +why you do not remove the vandalism protection on WP PXE's page.213.37.84.214 12:01 +" WP:AE notice I have opened a section on you at WP:AE here is a link " +Brazilians are latins, portuguese is a language that descend from Latin. +Stop lying about me.Chuck Marean +Stop plastering your face all over wiki and... hire professional editors. We like and appreciate that you have grown from a porn editor to a worldwide phenomenon, you have to be commended for that. You are -with no sense of irony- a pioneer. But you have to hire prof. editors because the people you have here have vested interests. Do that and I ll be more than happy to support you. BOL Jimmy I hope you can take the right decision. 82.21.25.194 +Admin Woody I see this so called Admin has been deleting perfectly good bits of infomation yet again, it's a shame they can't leave good and stop playing wiki gods, perhaps grow up a little Woody and stop altering things you know NOTHING about. +" Retirement As of 18 August, 2010, I will leave forever. It seems I am being bullied on here. After all the work I have done with no credit at all. I will not put up with this no longer. No help from admins, just wanting to block me, why don't you ""help"" me instead of ""picking"" on me? I made my mide up basically after I was blocked last time, I almost left but didn't and came back for week and now I am being treated like a person who came out of jail. I'm only aloud to make an edit to page a day, if I am being treated that way it is pointless to return. After 1 year, 5 months, 27 days, ""goodbye"". Please leave a goodbye message on discussions page if you please. GuineaPigWarrior Forever!" +C. Peter Wagner Please see Talk:C. Peter Wagner Hi PPdd I replied there. +Fuck you Putanginga mo!!! +Rollback g - ask me for rollback +Stub and rework For background information, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jagged 85. With 227 edits, , here, here or here. As the article has been created by Jagged 85 on 18 June 2007, there is no prior version to revert to. For this reason it needs to be stubbed completely. +What's ironic is that the user asking me to be blocked is his SOCKUPPET! Do a user check on him and find his IP. +Go fuck yourself you tedious little cunt. +courselittle did i know that my inability to have a life would result in total boredom and suicidal thinking +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!    talk  " +Your vandalism on British Raj page Please call for a vote if you feel that there is a consensus on the current description of the British Raj article. If not, please stop reverting the NPOV tag until all issues are resolved. Your attempts to remove NPOV tag from British Raj article constitutes vandalism. +Volkswagen I wasn't vandalising you little shit. 94.8.25.45 +" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Talk " +" I had never heard the term Greater Minnesota until now. Outstate, that I have heard, but not Greater Minnesota. I believe you are correct, that ""Greater "" usually refers to something outside of X. For example, many people will say they are going to Chicago when they may not actually set foot in Chicago, they are instead going to ""Greater Chicago"". " +":::I know the importance of Filmfare hurts you and the popularity of Bollywood hurts you even more. And I know the reason for that, the reason, just to drop the details, is, in short, POV. But I will still ask you to contain yourself and your language and be civil, because you are neither on a blog nor a chat nor an anti-Bollywood campaign. Your words here only confirm and strenghen the fact that you are biased and are against Bollywood, and that's where you edits POV-led edits come from. I would also ask you not to say what I do or don't have on my behalf, because, trust me, I obviously know a bit more than you about what I have, and what particularly I have. I can cite books, reliable sources and more and more, and I stand behind my claims. BTW, where are the sources for the State awards? hmm... I'm waiting. • Talk2me " +" Poor formating Somebody should move in to improve the format of this article; especially the paragraphs and sections. '''''''''' Msg " +Austrians = nazis Oh come on dude, you know it's true. Are you a sympathizer to the huns?192.12.88.2 +I did not perceived you attempt to discussion, sorry. Actually the article is doing worst possible by the so named “finding of a number only” there estimations which are intentionally increased like the “Centre Against Expulsions” work. Unnecessary you need to point on somebody who is responsible it is enough offensive providing numbers which are subjective and biased. There are official more or less numbers of all nations population killed in WW II. You should start from this, until I know the Germany lost 8.7% of population in it 2 810 000 civilians. Thus it is impossible that the numbers can reach 3 millions during expulsion. Are you count also those who were collaborators of Nazi Germany? Well, … I ask you to be reasonable. Do not put numbers which are just somebody biased “supposition”. Any way I found only one non-German estimation, which are Cold War effort most probably. Do you have UN or other independent sources regarding this numbers? Instead public “findings” which are very irritating you should look for objective source of information. Private multiplication of possibilities is offending. Do you know it? It is particularly such if you consider that other nations in fact lost much more and were not responsible for spark the hell of war. In total proportion for one German in the WW II was kill ten people of other nations. When somebody unleash beware dog who the culprit is? Dog or the person, and this is the case. I do not contradicts that after the WWII could occur lawlessness and lynches. Are you surprised of it? I am not, but you see if in competition during the 80’s the Soviets would invade Poland and Jaruzelski would support it in some way – we would blame Jaruzelski for our deaths in first place. The Soviets we world also, but first and above all Jaruzelski. He was the totalitarian and collaborator. Exactly the Germans should immediately and in first place blame Hitler and Nazi, though some love the Nazi ideology and activity. Instead I see the article where numbers are juggled for God knows what. Thus I say to you the article look unbalanced and with bad faith. I just do not have time to discuss details as it is from the start bad. The tags are unimportant until you will point to Hitler and Nazi in first sentence as the primary culprits. You or others definitely opposed the introductions, so…? The “recent” is not for philosophical deliberations. I took the word and sentence from the same article written long before I knew about it. Just I emphasize existing points – maybe deliberately hidden somewhere in the back and under carpet. Again, somebody dos not like the truth? Put “most recent” if you like. Do you? You must be referring to Overmans and Ingo Haar, two historians. Does the total number two really justify a plural expression? Anyway, let's take a look at them. I agree that total number of German deaths in Poland could be 1.1 milions. Twice there, 6 years of ocupations and guerrilla warfare, escape front od Soviet Army in winter 1944 and last the expulssion, which I can be shure was fewest deadly. But be specific with this numbers do not stick others. I very much beleave that in the post war phase the were revanges, but again are you surprised ?– evry 5th person in Poland was killed. Are you expecting after the “total war” against civilians evry of Polish citizen will be ideal christian and give you other chick to hit. If that was expected so it means the Nazi sin is all the more bigger. Also, the XX236 sugestion is good . Change the title of the article. Best A. +Notice please see this report . +guys a right knobjockey +Thanks for your concern But Striver and his friends' behavior has been completely beyond the pale. I cannot just sit idly by and pretend that they are something they are not, e.g. honest and well-meaning contributors. +" Hard GAR All three have supported. • NaNaNaC'mon! Closed and kept. — · [ TALK ] Thanks ) • NaNaNaC'mon! This might be useful for you This musicnotes gives Eminems vocal range (though I'm pretty sure he doesn't do an F2) so now you can include Rihanna's as well as his. • NaNaNaC'mon! Ignore that, i didn't see it said Part II. • NaNaNaC'mon! I was about to say... — · [ TALK ] Whoever wrote that one has no idea what they are talking about. That range is so wrong, they clearly don't know how the female vocals work, nor Rihanna's. • NaNaNaC'mon! Are you talking about the article or the web page? — · [ TALK ] No the web page. For a female to sing a range of F2-B3 in a song is ridiculous. • NaNaNaC'mon! Thank you Thanks for this correction. (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) You're most certainly welcome. I ""Checked on It"" and fixed it. — · [ TALK ] Lol. Were you referring to ""Check on It""? (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) Lol, yeah. — · [ TALK ] Lol. I love that song. I love everything about Beyonce to be frank. (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 14:08, 2 October 2011 +, 4 December 2014 (UTC) North in the image is 37 degrees to the left of up. Also, the image currenly has no north indicator. It appears to have been removed in the edit of 00:56, 4 December 2014. –  03:43 +I see you've met Joe Thanks for the vandal fighting help on my user page. That was Joe Hazelton, a long-time vandal who has some kind of personality disorder and loads of free time. He's perma-blocked, so there's no point in reasoning with him, and he's not going to take your advice anyway. Before I blocked him, I spent the better part of a year trying to reason with him and couldn't even get him to the point where he could refrain from calling people assholes and posting offensive ascii art. The thanks I get is a permanent stalker. +"::::::::::Oh I do enjoy insulting people whose behaviour makes them fully deserving of insults. It was you that made the issue of Ethnologue being a RS a big affair (as scripta manent - even in WP - all a reader has is to go up a few comments and see arrogant statements such as ""Until you can produce a reliable linguistic source that has conducted more recent linguistic surveys in northern Greece, then Ethnologue is the most recent, most reliable source."" when there was no census in 1986 to begin with! The gall of some people is astounding: they've all become ""specialists"" when they can hardly follow the Greek literature - because if they did you would be (a) dismissing Ethnologue's 1986 crap outright and (b) quoting the V-PRC survey which is recent and despite an obvious flaw of assuming no pluri-lingual descent/ability is the most recent and extensive statistical country-wide survey of use/understanding of non-Greek languages and significant Greek dialects in Greece to-date. If you were a specialist you would know that the US SD's ""estimate"" is not the result of a survey (do you seriously believe that any type of similar survey by a foreign power into such a matter would have gone unnoticed and not being reported in the Greek media causing a diplomatic episode?) but the estimate based on visits to some parts of Macedonia (in Greece) of a certain diplomat (later to become infamous through a very public resignation) called Brady Keisling that single-handedly raised the profile of the issue in the SD's HR reports. If you were a specialist - instead of trying to guess numbers you would be giving the number of villages in which the language was spoken by at least some inhabitants according to the 1996 Euromosaic study (which your pal FPS has apparently read - but still has been unable to digest enough to add Arvanites in Thrace in his ""map""). Then again you could do worse - your other pal Jim62sch seriously believes that you could have a non-government sponsored census (mind you not survey) in Greece (actually I wonder in how many developed countries can anyone other than the government ""convince"" people to stay home and open their doors for census takers to visit). Or that the results of such a private 1986 census would not become public until 2005! Maybe the evil Greek nationalists had a hand in that as well. God spare us from the all-powerful WP ""specialists"". " +" Maus What do you mean that there's ""far too much emphasis"" placed on the two-volume nature of the book? It is a book in two volumes, which were each published separately, some years apart; you can still, today, easily find each volume separately in libraries or stores. The first paragraph clearly explains the situation of the two volumes and if you think it doesn't emphasize this enough, why don't we just straightforwardly say that it is a single book originally published in two volumes? " +I live in white owl landing on phillips landing road. my county councilman tim dukes told me that I must write my concerns to you because you all control anything concerning the robert graham wildlife area on phillips landing road.well, here goes- any time we leave our development, the first thing we see is the awful mess across the road. there are fallen trees, twigs, branches, etc., all along that area and we all get absolutely disgusted every time we leave our homes. what is the point in living in a nice development like ours if we half to see that mess every time we leave????? isn't there anything at all that can be done about cleaning that junk up and make it more pleasant to look at. in Maryland they are letting people cut the fallen logs for firewood. can't we do that too?? please respond to my concerns at njkelley105@aol.com thank you for your attention njk +" Fair use rationale for Image:AladaTransportesAereos.JPG Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AladaTransportesAereos.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 0001 " +Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. +angela if you e-mail me at simonoverton@tiscali.co.uk I can send you a proof copy alpinist +Yes, it's still being used, but nowadays usually not as monotherapy, and in smaller doses than in the Concorde study. The main finding of the Concorde study was, that they could find no benefit in taking the drug before the symptoms appear, ie. the progression to advanced disease wasn't affected. I wouldn't call the difference in death rate (176/171) statistically higher (bad luck?). After all that was just one study, there are others that contradict. Here's a couple of sites on AZT safety: a WHO study, NIAID site and AEGiS. 18:22, Jul 27, 2004 (UTC) +Yes sorry for the confusion mate. As i said though, i didn't actually accuse you but it was the only place i could find to write anything. So again, sorry. 90.203.114.86 +A tag has been placed on Hillsboro Aviation, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Deal with whatever definitions the critics use. +Journal of Rheumatology Article Ocaasi, Have you had a chance to read the Journal of Rheumatology article I tried to add as a reference on the chiropractic page? I don't know who quackguru is but I have a feeling from the name that there is at least a hint of bias. The article by Ernst is the only article (with multiple flaws) that I know that has ever even stated that the risk by far outweighs the benefits. Most of the articles I have seen state that manipulation (which is only one part of chiropractic) is at least as effective and most conclude that manipulation used with a multimodal approach such as with exercise therapy has a synergistic effect and is by far safer than OTC meds, NSAID's and prescription medications in the long term. Think about it, less than 30 deaths after billions of treatments over 100 years is surely considered extremely safe. I contacted the American Chriopractic Association. They stated that they have already tried to provide information about scope of practice to Wikipedia but they are having troubles with posting to the page also. If there is ever a source that should be considered respectable to Wikipedia, it should be the American Chiropractic Association (the chiropractic equivalent to the American Medical Association). Please let me know what I need to do to get the more positive and consistent research to post to this page. I am a little suprised at how difficult this is. I have peer reviewed medical research and the American Chiropractic Association trying to provide proof that the information I presented was accurate. I am not sure what else I can do. Please forgive my ignorance. I am new to this site and I am still learning the rules. Thanks, Bill +Well, the IP addresses match up with some of the, erm... shall we say 'anonymous' edits and contributions to your own self-publicity CV ego-entry on Wikipedia, and those of the rest of the Dunin family 'entries' so I'll continue believing my systems engineering team, and you can continue protesting. In the meantime, Dr Ralls has fully endorsed our site (I've forwarded you her email), and I would suggest that you stop using language like 'not reliable' when you have absolutely no history educational plaudits to your name (source = Wikipedia) as you claim to be a cryptologist and games writer. Obviously you know more than she does, despite quoting some of her books here as a reliable source of reference. I would also like to know just on what basis you are using the words 'not reliable' when there's nothing in your educational background to suggest that you have licence or reliable authority to compare to her opinion or educational background on the subject of medieval history. I am forwarding you her email in the hope that you finally accept a reliable source of information that has (as you insist) been peer reviewed - when it first went live - and stop this ridiculous know-all behaviour, which is starting to be seen by others on Wikipedia as a sign of diminishing your own last-vestiges of credibility - I've had emails through from all sorts of sources. Having read the entire history of your self-publicity entry and noted the contributors and your merry band of sock-puppets (as put by one Wiki editor) it appears blatantly obvious that there is more than one person out there who gets fed up with your continual editing and arguing, and your tactic of deploying a vast army of friends to defend the suitability of such a self-inflated ego entry isn't going to work here on a subject that does actually qualify to be part of an encyclopaedic medium. EnsRedShirt who is trying to defend you here, has edited your own self-publicity entry so it appears that his/her opinion on this separate matter is simply that of a sock-puppet to re-quote that delightful expression from the Wiki team. As to accusations of COI linking to self-developed websites, I think you need to take a long hard look in the mirror. In the meantime, have a nice day. +" needs correction as follows: # Zaidi (Shia) AND # Ibadi (Khawarij) Amman Message In the modern era, Sadiq al-Mahdi, the former Prime Minister of Sudan, defined the recognized schools of Muslim jurisprudence as eight specific schools.Hassan Ahmed Ibrahim, ""An Overview of al-Sadiq al-Madhi's Islamic Discourse."" Taken from The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Islamic Thought, p. 172. Ed. Ibrahim Abu-Rabi'. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. ISBN 978-1-4051-7848-8 The Amman Message, a three-point ruling issued by 200 Islamic scholars from over 50 countries, officially recognizes those eight legal schools of thought.The Three Points of The Amman Message V.1 Hanafi (Sunni) Maliki (Sunni) Shafi'i (Sunni) Hanbali (Sunni) Ja'fari (Shia) (including Mustaali-Taiyabi Ismaili) Zaidi (Shia) Ibadi (Khawarij) Zahiri" +. This behavior is in the Wikipedia app, not the mobile website +then you must prove it... +" Because the default value of the minthreadsleft parameter (which specifies how many is the fewest number of threads to leave on a page) is 5. 13 " +Introductory Paragraphs The intro paragraphs are good, but they could be a lot better. I think that right now there's too much of a technical sound to it, as opposed to something more educational and inviting to people trying to learn about the subject. I'd just like you to compare/contrast with the following paragraph, which is how evolution is introduced in a Bio101 textbook: (Fair use excerpts follows) Evolution originated with Darwin's publication of the Origin of Species...He argued from evidence that the species of organisms inhabiting Earth today descended from ancestral species. Second, he proposed a mechanism for evolution which he termed natural selection, the idea that organisms can change over the generations if individuals having certain heritable traits leave more offspring than other individuals. ..In modern terms, we would say that the genetic composition of the population had changed over time, and that is one way of defining evolution. But we can also use the termin evolution on a much grander scale to mean all of the biological history, from the earliest microbes to the enormous diversity of modern organisms. An understanding of evolution informs every field of biology, and applications of evolutionary biology are transforming medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation...Evolution integrates all of biology. (above is for example purposes onlywe can't use this in the article.) We can't use the above since it would be fair-use, but do you see what I mean about making the article more accessible? Another thing I'd note about the above example is that it also makes Evolution sound more exciting. Just because we are an encyclopedia doesn't mean we can't put the subject in the exciting, important context that it deserves. We could use something closer to the above, and then dive into a description of how the Theory of Evolution (what you might call a description of the fact of evolution that's described above) has developed from Darwin's original theory to modern-day explanations (and at the same time state how the question of whether evolution occurs has been a relatively incontroversial fact amongst biologists for the better part of a century). +" The removed setence ""Between 2001 and 2007 just R$11.1 billion, roughly US$6.1 billion, were invested in the military."" has source. The source is ""O dia"" http://odia.terra.com.br/brasil/htm/pais_gigante_defesa_pobre_133990.asp offers IMO a unique perspective on the ammount that has been invested over the recent years. Could I add that sentence back? " +I want the Wikipedia article to be neatly arrange ) +It's Just It's just a series of tubes. Ten movies are streaming across the Internet, what happens to your own personal internet? 80.192.32.85 +Go eat shit Yes i think you should go eat shit, my comment was fully true and consisted of no false statements, so go eat shit you stupid useless piece of shit. Thank you ) +" Blanking of information without explanation is generally construed as vandalism. I came across your deletion before I noted your changes to the infobox. In future, you should leave an edit summary so that your intent is more clear to other editors. Ħ " +Mikalah Gordon I think that was her, she was about Eurasian (mixed ancestry), selective mutism, and January 14, 1988. +I am interested in the two vessels above, as our family surname is Harfleet (which translates into Harfleur in French where we originate from) I am trying to see if there is any relevance for our family tree - if anyone has any information then that would be great, Thanks Vicky (Harfleet) +" The full documented list of Muslim authors who wrote that blacks were cursed to slavery by Noah's ""Curse of Ham"" actually does go all the way to the time of the prophet (Ibn Ata), according to the sources present in the article so far. You don't dispute that it is a documented teaching of Mediaeval Muslim scholars, you seem to be arguing that we all have an obligation not to report this fact because it doesn't fit in with your teaching. But the way wikipedia works is, if Mediaeval Muslim scholars taught such a thing, and it is documented, then we are allowed to say that Mediaeval Muslim scholars taught such a thing and that it is documented. /talk/ " +" spaces I've come across a number of articles about Indian politicians that you have created. Could you please remember to add a space after periods and commas. Also, use ""and"" at the end of a list, example: Member of parliament in 1927, 1929 and 1931. " +This is internet so isn't a personal attack, I don't know who the hell you are also twat I should have free speech. You can ban this IP address but I'll only get another one, what's the point, bloody hell if I can't say what the hell I like in my own user page there is something wrong here. Go die you wiki lover you're against free speech and freedom of expression. This makes you a Nazi fuck with a small pencil you massive bell I can cite that as well, arse. +The picture that was posted was a photograph,from the USAA annual report, of Dawn Johnson, Robert G. Davis's mistress - who runs the USAA slush-fund buying organization. While Ms. Johnson is quite photogenic, she is actually a middle-aged fairly wide-hipped and quite over-weight female. While Mr. Robert G. Davis is a philanderer and wife-cheater - he is not a child-molester. And no photographs of Mr. Davis's children (if indeed he has any) were ever published on Wikipedia. +" Begining of the article There are two links to ""Big Bang (disambiguation)"" at the begining one should be removed. Since it's a locked article I can't do that." +" Yes, you have time to edit-war and restore the article to promotional version but not to edit to correct it. When corrected by some other editor, you claim it not to be perfect and do revert repeatedly. I see no good in promotional and unsourced tone and contents based purely on primary source. Edit-warring? Did I make any edit without leaving an edit summary? It is you, despite discussing the concerns on here, you went on to make revert multiple times. I'm very much disappointed to see apparently an established editor behaving, yes, much likely to a WP:NOTHERE editor. It is you, who chooses to revert instead discussing the changes. You came here to leave a comment only after making a revert. Did you notice it? You choose to post a warning template on my talk page, instead initiating a discussion on article's talk page. You should post a edit-warring template yourself on your talk page, being honest seeing the page history. And, If I really am edit-warring, then I dare you to make a case at ANEW/ANI. You did not answer one previous question. Have you some 'conflict of interest' with the subject? And, the headline of the discussion is very much appropriate. You see good in 'promotional contents either unsourced or dependent of primary sources', and claim it to be encyclopedic. Is it really what you understand of encyclopedic contents? In my edit, the article has less contents, but at least it is encyclopedic, what Wikipedia is all about (see, WP:ENC). I do not care for contents, I care of standard. And, that's what I did when removed promtional, unsourced and duly based on primary source contents and you did re-instate the same multiple times (4 times, am I required to cite diff. links?) You say, ""[..]An article must inevitably describe its subject. It is the purpose of an article[..]"", NO, information present in Wikipedia articles should be based on secondary, independent and reliable sources and the same should be written in a neutral tone. Wikipedia does not accept original research. Maintenance tags are not an excuse to put in unsourced, promotional tone into any Wikipedia article. Do you understand it? I may expand more, if you want me to. -Let's talk! " +Hi Hi, could you take a look at user WhoSays edits on Eric Saade, I think that the user has made the article into an unsourced and commentary version deleting alot of sourced material on December 25. If you find that to be so too please take some action as the user has been warned several times now. Sincerely. +Re: Katrina deaths I found another source. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/08/31/ohioans_focus_on_helping_katrina_victims/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News The information is shown about 2/3 down the page. The original link changed the news story on the same page. I will change them. +HEY ASSHOLE How about you let the asshole respond to my question before you decide to take it down your a cunt. DO u have some wiki god complex. Calm down its just a website stop going crazy when someone edits something you dont like. Last i checked i was in my own right to express my point of view and not have a prick like u revoke it before its heard. SO go fuck off and if i get banned for this i hope u die u stupid basterd. You dont own wiki u dont run it you are nothing so realize it and just kill yourself. +Hey Who do you think you are dude. Don't tell me what to do, and how I should do it mind your own business. Melina is now a member of Smackdown. She was drafted tonight on Raw. +Usually I’m not answering questions like this (because the answer it too obvious), but I’ll make an exception: Majority of the people in Macedonia are Macedonians, we are not speaking Bulgarian dialect, instead we are speaking Macedonian language and the Macedonia name is not a Greek property. +Time Times (2008-05) +Image:InsideAgraFort.jpg I would like to draw attention to the text below the photo labeled 'InsideAgraFort.jpg' as seen on the Wikipedia's 'Red Fort at Agra' page. It states that the photograph was taken at Khas Mahal. This is incorrect as this location is known as the Musamman Burj, where Shahjahan spent the last seven years of his life under house arrest by his son Aurganzeb. +Most entries on Wikipedia for movies typically feature 'spoilers', from plot to character development, considering the nature of encyclopedic entries. 222.154.232.126 +replied on your talk.. communication error, no worries - +Juffo-Wup is All... omni-existent, spreading and changing the Non into Juffo-Wup. You are the Non, who must become Juffo-Wup or Void. 4.240.244.226 +That's just an essay, not a guideline. Do you have any idea how offensive it is to men and women in the armed forces risking their lives overseas for Wikipedia (or any other) charlatans to falsely claim veteran status? And why am I blocked, other than that User:Zoeoconnell, a known liar, asked you to block me? What policy did I violate? Give me a quote.67.170.87.223 +" Any statement that begins with the words ""It is quite annoying"" is anything but ""polite"". The demand that WP:RS and WP:V be reviewed before creating articles was entirely unneeded and inappropriate in an article that contains a reliable and verifiable source. The overall incivility and personal attack implied in your comment meet the definition of violations of both WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. " +"This article is a grammatical mess. The first two paragraphs are full of redundancies and little useful information. I would use SlimVirgin’s suggestion for the first paragraph: “Ali Sina is the founder of Faith Freedom International, a site set up to help Muslims leave Islam. According to the website, Sina is himself a former Muslim, now a secular humanist of Iranian-Canadian nationality."" And for the second paragraph I suggest the following: The name Ali Sina may be a pseudonym. (This is fact! Nowhere has he said Ali Sina is not his real name. If he has, I never saw it. Has anyone? I read somewhere he wrote that his mother named him Ali because of some Shiite credence) Sina says because of the death threats he does not wish to be filmed. Some of his opponents claim he hides his real identity because he is not an ex-Muslim. OceanSplash 11 Dec.2005 08:57 " +kosovothanksyou.com is sponsored by serbian anti-kosovar cetniks. 89.204.136.53 +" First of all I have nothing against you or Rouvas (who is an artist I actually like) in case there is a misunderstanding. I read the changes and I have to admit that you did a very good job... but I still think you exagerate in general about Rouvas. He's not perfect in everything as the whole bio clearly slows. And the movie Sta Akra (because I live in Greece) was not a BIG box office hit... Don't live in a bubble. And in the article there's only one positive review from Zoumboulakis praising his performance and the movie itself. In this case only one review means that his performance was indeed good and proves a point and many ""random reviews"" cannot prove that a movie was good or bad in the case of Alter Ego? (and let's face it... it was a really bad movie, but that's my opinion). You repeatedly put info in the Anna Vissi article, stating her commercial decline. Apagorevmeno sold 27.000 units (2x platinum) and it was her lowest selling album. You can't say that. I believe Rouvas' ""Parafora"" certified double platinum, or am I wrong? I am not sure. But if it's true how many units did he sold. There must be around 25.000 units or more, right? That means it's his lowest selling album, right? If it is I didn't see you writing on his article!!! So, some things apply for Vissi and not for Rouvas. I think it's unfair and you're being highly impartial. Not to mention that Rouvas never made huge sellings (like 7 platinum that Vissi did) but he still is a big selling artist so his decline cannot be that obvious like Vissi and Vandi. (I really hope you get my point and what exactly I'm trying to say to you). So it's not easy or even possible to reach a 7 platinum status again in someone's career and especially in this period. I'm not mad about anything especially for a bad review that concerns Vissi. I'm used to it. To me it sounds really bad when someone uses the word ""decline"" in an article because some reporter decided it is so. Anyway I'm sorry if I seemed a little mean (I'm not, really!!!). and one question: do you speak greek? " +or at least block him too }} +WWE PPV Theme Info Deleted Well, since none of Metallica's songs are considered relevant to be noted as theme songs for WWE shows on it's page, I guess none of Rev Theory's songs are notable for it, right? +" How does the language of the Franks, which is known more or less from place names and personal names only plus a few borrowed words, tell us anything about their ethnicity? We knew they were Germanic before that. Are you implying that there is a connection between Dutch and Frankish ""ethnicity""? That connection, though it is probably there, is not very direct over a thousand five hundred years... I don't know why the fact that a Frankish-derived language (Dutch) being spoken in a certain region (the Netherlands) should force us to believe that the Franks were originally from there. Of course the two facts are related, but the fact of the language being spoken there does not itself tell us that at one point in time its inhabitants were primarily Franks any more than the fact that a Latin-derived language is spoken in Belgium tells us that at one point in time its inhabitants were primarily Romans. Again, I understand the connection, but it is not made on linguistic analysis alone. This is why most books/articles on the Franks that I've read (Wallace-Hadrill, Bachrach) don't mention Dutch. Your comment about Franci seniores (what does the Franci superiores have to do with anything?) does nothing to explain to me the importance of their language. Their well-attested written language was Latin. Why not mention that? In fact, it tells us far more about the Franks than that they spoke a proto-Dutch language. As to the remarks concerning the pertinence of my comments only for the Merovingian period, I was not aware that the article was about the development of a language and not about the Franks, a term which does not have a consistent universal ethnic/tribal meaning by the end of the 9th century (and probably by the end of the 8th). In short, I don't see how you have actually answered the objection. I don't know what ""German"" point of view you think I have, but I find that ridiculous. And shouldn't a minority of scholarship moreso undermine your ""Dutch"" point of view? Finally, when did I declare myself a Carolingian specialist? I have no specialty. " +Good. Where to we begin? There is a lot of duplication in the article and a lot of information that needs modernizing given that there has been much more research published that gives a more accurate description of chiropractic practice and the professional directions in 2008. I also think that there should be an increased focus on non-USA chiro developments that would provide a better world wide POV. What do you guys think? +David Hayter page It seems you put down David Hayter's religion as Jewish. Do you have a source to confirm this? Thanks. +"The game Chrono Trigger is verification that the characters exist and are notable. Undue weight refers primarily to differing viewpoints. The statement in WP:WEIGHT, ""An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject."" does not mean that articles cannot be split off. WP:WEIGHT also says ""Minority views can receive attention on pages specifically devoted to them."" It is not ""undue weight"" to split larger articles into several separate articles. And I really don't care about WP:FICT says — the whole thing is disputed. I think you need to realize that the people who are most willing to put time into improving an article (and do it for free) are fans. I don't care about your opinion of what is ""necessary."" " +I have no prior experience with VfDs except for GNAA which is obviously run differently, so I admit I don't really know how it works. ) +Agree I'd say, that the first sentence should explain the meaning of the phrase rather than who has used it before. +" Well, yes. After the War, Catholic peasants who wanted control of their children's lives killed government-sent anti-Catholic (""Socialist"") teachers in some parts of Mexico. And the government itself continued to murder priests and nuns. For example, Fr. Pro. Sad that that the oppression of the Catholic peasants continued and sad that they resisted, right? But this is not part of the Cristero War, so move it to another page. Please." +If not for me, then for the admin? +weng chun <> wing chun Hi Wgungfu, Why did you change the page about Weng Chun to redirect it to Wing Chun? As specified on the page, these are two different styles. +Proposed Merge of Judiciary of Australia into Law of Australia From a quick read the content(although it is uncited) is almost entirely covered in Law of Australia already, any other details can be merged into this article. Once done, Judiciary of Australia can be set as a redirect to Law of Australia#Judicial system. +as evidence Lincoln did the same +" British English tag Sorry no idea about Wikitionary - however I do know that the template used are seperate for the two projects. : (Talk Page)/ " +" Critias. Harmonia recruited you while saying he would not engage in discussion. Obviously implying you should not discuss things also. On the other hand you wrote this: ""I support 2 separate pages leaving the current page title non-lethal only."" " +", 10 August 2010 (UTC) No, that's why clearly stating and/or linking to the earlier senators would be beneficial. -Scenario- Joe Schmo is looking up the history of the NHL. Oh the Senators have won 11 cups, comes to the Sens wikipedia article and it shows zero. ""That doesn't make much sense !"" -or- Joe Schmo comes to the Sens wikipedia article and it shows ""Stanley Cups 0, (Senators 1883-1934 (11)) or something to that matter, and links him to the early sens article. ""Oh the earlier senators won those 11, thanks wikipedia !"" Joe Scmo goes home happy and informed. 19:36" +You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. You're an asshole. +Erroneous edits Re: Michael Wolff (musician); Queen (Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs); Speed Racer (film); etc Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. +Quote Requested Tufan Turenc 2 Ekim Hurriyet http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/haber.aspx?id=5183344&yazarid;=39 +" Intro Paragraph The intro paragraph states: The modern era has unfolded in the shadow of the French Revolution. The growth of republics and liberal democracies, the spread of secularism, the development of modern ideologies and the invention of total war[2] all mark their birth during the Revolution. This intro is very Eurocentric. Liberal democracies existed before the French Revolution (The United States), secularism was not born during this time, the ""development of modern ideologies"" is ambiguous, and ""total war"" certainly wasn't invented during this period." +" check mate buddy, I just saw that you were blocked for 31 hours. so good game, but I win. I always win.soda " +" Mainstream science ignores the research because (i) mainstream scientists are not, with very few exceptions, doing any research on TM. The overwhelming majority of this research is being done by a handful of people all with ties to MUM and the M Org. and (ii) virtually none of it ever gets cited in any other research other than again, by the same small circle of TM-sponsored researchers. Reread WP:SET because is specifically warns that Google News and Google Scholar are not appropriate for what you propose - trying to weigh the relative prominence of one. I have proposed a metric for the research portion of this article: use only the studies which per WP:MEDRS are regarded as the most reliable - and that would be the handful of metastudies published in peer-reviewed jounals which have done the job that the editors here are frankly incapable of doing - determining which of the ""hundreds"" of ""peer reviewed"" studies on meditation were properly conducted and appropriately documented, and then assess whether or not they show anything significant. And, I am happy to stand by my edits and my history of achieving consensus whereever and whenever other editors are actually interested in consensus. " +REDIRECT Talk:Stoneage (Stone album) +"::I agree. the users seem to have very similar edits and I think you should place an entry at WP:RCU. Cheers, AX " +I am a new user and I thought a good first article would be about Melon Bikes. There are many other articles about folding bike companies on Wikipedia and it seemed reasonable that there be one about all the notable folding bike companies. I am neither an employee of or affiliated with Melon Bicycles, and after review I could see how it resembles an advertisement but no more than any of the other folding bike articles (which is what I based this article on). I have corrected the in-line citation problem and will continue to work on making the article more neutral. Outtjp7 +we would like to request you not to delete this page because it is from the organization only we send these data of chairman to other news portals. We haven't copied this content from anywhere. It has been months that we have been trying to create an account of Dr. Sahoo and you people delete the entire thing without giving us any solution to the problem. It would be highly appreciated if you can suggest changes. +The fight aint over Ante!!! She is not a Croat. She is a BosnianCroat. She is from the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Not Kurvatska. She is a ethnic Croat and nationality Bosnian. That you understand also! +Studio Albums and EPs What is currently on that page should stay there. And mixtapes do belong just take a look at this page. +" Pronunciation of Tylium I think it should be noted that it is pronounced ""Tie-lium"" in the original seriesand ""Till lee um"" in the most recent, of which is has the prominence. http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Tylium -Ottoo" +Been there, done that. -) - +I am getting threats from somebody in Arizona? Well, i hope this one can read english. If you can read english, so i hope, read the bill of rights and know that when you delete my phrase: god bless america ! you are just buying a cheap ticket to one of our federal prisons. I am not scared, i am in the US, there is nothing to be afraid of here. Tell your friend that thinks he can write english to get a life. The article is incorrect, they are using this space for political propaganda, i am free to discuss and opine. Isn't this country wonderful? +I'll stop!!!!! NO I WON'T! I AM A DEMON CHILD! I AM DEMONIC! +* IP address: 87.112.72.201 * Blocking admin: Ck lostsword * Block reason: Attempting to fix non-NPOV article in the face of uneducated other users: a personal attack with only one warning a second before, only on Xenophobia * Block originally applied to: 87.112.72.201 * Your account name (if you have one): * An explanation of why your block is unfair: 1. admins trolling and conducting and edit war on the basis of trying to enforce their non-NPOV views on an article incited my annoyance (nobody likes trolls) 2. inappropriate use of warnings by incompetent admin not seeing an asymmetric edit war taking place (a couple of warnings would have been apt; blocking is an overreaction, and slighty pointless when I have access to several hundred computers and a huge range of potential IP addresses to use - i.e.: it's spiteful. +NOW! REMOVE IT FROM YOUR SITE NOW! YOU DAMNED THIEVES! +Wellington Metropolitan vs Wellington Urban As someone who has lived in Wellington off and on for 20 years (I now regard it as my home town): In all of this one crucial fact is overlooked, the Wellington Metropolitan area includes the Kapiti Coast as far as Waikanae. There are several thousand people who commute to other parts of the urban area everyday and the Suburban rail network goes to Paraparaumu, with a planned extension to Waikanae. Almost everyone I know thinks of the Kapiti area as part of Greater Wellington. So I am left wondering why the boffins in Wellington refuse to include this area in the Urban data. Yes I know there is the stretch of road past Paekakariki, but that's no different from the Haywards Road or the Hutt Road. In reality, in spite of the classifications, Wellington remains the second largest Metropolitan Area in New Zealand, by my calculation the population including the Kapiti suburbs is around 415,000, still around 30,000 more than Christchurch. If Christchurch gets to include non-contiguous suburbs (eg Halswell, Lyttelton), then so should Wellington. Not only that, Banks Peninsula was included in Christchurch in 2006 so that Bob Parker could become mayor of Christchurch and promote Christchurch as the second largest city in NZ. The reality is Christchurch has an inferiority complex, and I can say that because I'm from there. It doesn't change the fact that Wellington has more people and is more important than Christchurch, no matter which way the geographers and politicians want to spin it. Instead of merging the pages how about creating a new one for GREATER WELLINGTON, which could include Kapiti. +Holy. Ok lets talkie the Carly issue first. There are youtube videos that can prove her age. An editor had last put in 1972 as the birth year and stated that that was the right one. Why are you being so h'annoying (yes)? Now, lets go to the date of births. If they cant be in the infobox (where info like DOB should be) it should be included in the text. And yes it should. I don't care if you think it's trivia, tell someone who actually cares. Now, with that aside, Onscreen birth dates should be included. I'm going to put them back or mention them in the consensus. +Who is responsible for this probably wrong edit? +Your email did not mention the GDFL. It doesn't have to be this complicated. Just write an article in your own words and list the website as a source. Larf 00:08, August 16, 2005 (UTC) +PIKACHU OPENED UP WIDE AND FILLED WITH SEMEN FROM A LARGE PHALLUS. HJ MITCHELL GETS TURNED ON BY PAGE MOVE LOGS. +" My view on this is probably similar (but probably not identical) to Cirt's. Speaking for myself, I have two problems with the use of ""Calvinist"" on this basis: (i) there are multiple ways that calling a website 'The Calvinist Corner' the most obvious is that Slick is writing from a Calvinist perspective. Another might be that he is writing about Calvinism. To take the former as true, and draw the the conclusion that Slick is a Calvinist is an inference and thus WP:Synthesis. It's most probably true, but not the sort of thing we're meant to be doing on Wikipedia. (ii) There's a fairly strong Calvinist thread through much (most?) of conservative evangelical Christianity. There are probably dozens of articles where we could find a similar level of evidence for applying the word 'Calvinist'. We don't, and to my mind shouldn't, unless a WP:SECONDARY source feels it sufficiently relevant/important a description to make use of it. This means that such articles aren't 'loaded up' with true-but-of-doubtful-relevance WP:IINFO descriptions. I suspect that part of the problem is that much of the secondary-source writing concentrates on CARM rather than Slick personally. However this simply means that, per WP:DUE, we should follow suit. ''TalkStalk''(P) " +Please add who did he take over in his college freshman season? +Notability The subject in question doesn't carry any encyclopedic value. Andrew Schlafly seems to be an activist or local political leader of sorts who happens to maintain a fairly controversial web page. In any case, most of Schlafly's popularity seems to derive from public criticism of his web page and being the son of a much more notable activist. Because any sort of significance he holds is completely tied with his own Conservapedia, it would seem fair to delete this entry or at least merge it with the Conservapedia article. Please sound off below. +Hi Tonxxx! The issue with the articles is not that they sound like adverts, but simply that there is nothing in them to indicate why the subjects are notable. Please have a look at the notability guidelines for companies and for web sites, and note that notability should be supported by reliable third-party sources. Thank you! '''' contributions talk +You have recently created a page under the title New Page. I moved it to its proper location, that is, Première (pay TV channel) +" Vidkun, It looks like we agree more than we disagree. We agree, it's only been *called* Wicca since Gardner. That's what I said before. Witchcraft has indeed been practiced for eons before Gardner. No argument there. I've already said my piece about initiation and covens. So I won't rehash that. I will add that I feel it's equally valid and important to note that those who aren't in covens are ""initiated"" into Wicca by God and Goddess themselves. That is more important, at least in my opinion, than a coven initiating them. I will differ with you on one other thing that hasn't been previously discussed. Unless you're referring to orthopraxy on a fairly broad scale, I don't see that as being valid either. Again, the concept ""an it harm none, do as ye will"" would also range to differing practices, ideas, and the like. That phrase, as pointed out, wasn't even coined by Gardner, but Crowley, and even before him. Blessed be. Gabhin " +Darth Binky our website is Jedi-Order.blogspot.com +whereas East Asians came from East Africa, +User:Notespace is Getting Blocked No objections to an indefinite block. My other question would be whether there's a connection between this user and ''' (talk) +DO NOT MESS WITH LIA, WE WILL BEAM YOU WITH OUR LAZORS, HAVE FUN M8 +When tears come down like fallin' rain / you'll walk around and call my name / you'll wlak the floor the way I do / your cheatin' heart will tell on you +" User:Ian.thomson, it appears that you don't actually know the meaning of the word ""consensus""; you use it interchangeably with ""majority"". Anyway, the issue is unresolved both here and on the administrators' noticeboard, so it's totally inappropriate for you to be ramming changes through in the meantime. As I said before, I innocently and helpfully fixed a consistency issue; it was )" +" Copyright status of Image:NAA6.png Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or from printed material. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:NAA6.png with a link to where we can find that note; If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Image:NAA6.png with a link to the details. Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. " +" Fair enough Wasn't intended as an attack but point taken. talk to me " +" And since so many people seem interested: I'm watching the Braves game, bored, My fuck buddy is busy seeing The Incredible Hulk with her dad and I want to edit Cameron Worrell. That's why I'm asking for it to be shortened. That, and it's really not deserved as Pats1 has already explained at length. I'll deal with it, but Pats is on the money when he points out that I was banned more for my past than anything done lately. I haven't asked Pats to say anything on my behalf and I actually told him it wasn't worth the trouble, but he's right nonetheless. So that's that.►''''''Holla! " +Proposed Tibetan naming conventions A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—(Talk!·What have I done?) +b) How/why is this of relevance? +" Frankly I am less interested than comparisons between coordination between with the list vs watchlist coordination than opaque coordination (list or watchlist) vs transparent collaboration. I am just wondering what effects on articles (if any) can be seen. I know these tactics frustrate editors and hold back the articles by attrition. And the ""other side"" are all parties too. I am not suggesting you only present evidence against EE list members. Or even that it really be focused on individual editors. What has the existence of a Battleground done to articles in this topic area, is really what I want to know. While EE editors have apologized for some personal offenses, I believe that none of them have shown understanding that they harmed Wikipedia. I am probably wrong about none, but I can't recall this. I can't say that I have even paid much attention to this at the individual editor level. Except to be honest I feel a bit differently about the admin. Mostly I want support for the argument that the whole Battleground approach is inferior. Evidence that shows damage done by all parties for what it is would help because the focus on the revelations from the list while ignoring the other half the battleground reinforces their feelings of persecution. Right now each side exaggerates the damage done by the other and then there is extra evidence against EE from the list. If we don't convince them that we have a point about condemning this sort of behavior; I don't know that anything Arbcom can do will make an impact. Arbcom isn't good at convincing. If you think you have a chance of convincing them, I think it would be helpful.SB " +mmmm i love them. Also i go to mcdonalds a lot. I like their hamburgers. Especially their big fattie lard ones. They make me even more hungry. Then I got to Burger King. One day I was talking to the king. Suddenly I looked over at him and I saw him as a big juicy hamburger. I got hungry. I then proceeded to eat him. +I-Train how does any of those refs prove he was on the Berlin thunder, he was never on it +" ""I was at Boscastle during the 2004 flash floods camping. One day it was sunny, the next we weere caught in the tail end of a storm from Jamaica. I was dreadful,"" School Girl, Bristol, 20:52 14th July 2008" +, plus I'd never buy *this* DVD! +You first piss off a user and then pretend to advise that user on how detrimental being pissed off is. Wow, I'm so pissed I'm so I'm soooo... fuck off, pig! Now that was quite polite of me you got to admit it. Or was it not good enough for sophisticated ears of an average warmongering Anglo-Serb Freemason who thinks everyone is buying his bullshit? LOL +Tourette's clip I've heard nothing from the Tourette's Association about permission yet. Sorry to get your hopes up like that. Very weird, indeed. Do you know about this Tim Vickers coup? What a man. +" That's true, and I appreciate it, but I still wish you had disclosed to Damon " +, where is this gedankexperiment coming from anyway? What is its relevance? Is there any such experiment that has ben reported in a peer refereed journal? If not, why is it included? +I didn't say we should cite the blogpost itself, but do I think it is very interesting for the range of views it mentions. It shouldn't be too difficult to find appropriate citations for the scholars mentioned. +" Hello - I have no idea how to reply to a message but this editing system appears to allow me to write here. You sent a message saying I had edited a page about the ""scottish national party"" and had violated neutrality editing policy? I have edited only one page on ""plockton"" since registering at Wikipedia and - evidently - still don't know my way around the site. Whatever the mistake was, it was not made by me. Thank you for the message but you got the wrong person. (sgitheanaich)" +I tend to use an escalation system. If you look at the IP in question - it had been blocked only twice before (mine is the third) - compare that with the last IP in the list and you will see more blocks and the escalation from hours to days to a month. From my perspective the first IP will get a longer block if it comes back again to vandalise - to say 1 month or 3 months etc. talk +" wish it would mention the hardships of founding and keeping the city alive, and the burning of the capital building, how the 1st burned to the ground, and how hard it was to build such a building in the 1930's. I wish it would describe Bismarck today but then again that should be in the culture section.) As you scroll down you see ugly pictures that are sparingly used and a wreck that is supposed to be describing the climate of Bismarck I'm sorry, but this is what would be called ""unencyclopedic"" here. We don't want emotive descriptions of places. We want neutral ones - see WP:NPOV - as if written by someone who neither likes nor dislikes the place. Imagine Bismarck as a city in Siberia you have no interest in. You have no opinion about its culture or its climate, or how hard anyone might have worked to build it. Write about it from that viewpoint. " +God evening, the briefcase may be, as you say of significance, however I do not believe it warrants 700 words. Marmot +. (The Times, Thursday, July 3rd, 1879) ~ MARRIAGES On the 30th June, at Monkstown Church, county Dublin, Ireland, by the (Right-Reverend) the Lord Bishop of Ossory, assisted by the (Reverend Canon) Peacocks, - Charles Thornton Primrose Grierson, B.A., son of the late George Abraham Grierson, Esquire, of Rathfarnham House, county Dublin, Ireland, to Blanche Caldwell Bloomfield, only daughter of John Caldwell Bloomfield, Esquire, Castle Caldwell, county Fermanagh, Ireland. Charles Thornton Primrose Grierson & his wife, Blanche Caldwell Bloomfield who +"Relisted to generate more discussion. –'''''' | Talk " +https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsqDyEMkLpQ - Compared to the HARM CAUSED BY HOMEOPATHY! SCOFF! +Thanks Thanks for your kind remarks on my talk page. Don't think we've met, but good to meet another 2003 newbie. Best +and put a revised version back in. I further revised it to make it even less commercial and a bit more encyclopedic. However, I agree with you as regards its current form +History of K.M.F. (Kill-Marry-Fuck): The concept and game of K.M.F. was first commissioned by Courtney Porcella—resident of the City of Sin, Lynn, MA—in the early twenty first century in the United States of America, more specifically Massachusetts. Spreading initially as “Kill-Marry-Fuck” between her and her close friends, this game quickly spread throughout the fourth floor of Donahue at Suffolk University, the school she currently attends. Although this game quickly manifested itself into a game of pastime, it has never reached its full potential as an ice breaker due to the lingering question of its social acceptability. Prior to the spring of 2010, K.M.F. was referred to as its founding name, “Kill-Marry-Fuck.” The cause of the name change was brought on by a Senator from Suffolk University’s Student Government Association. The main reason behind the move for the change was to reflect the professionalism of the student leaders occupying the offices on the fourth floor of Donahue. Although K.M.F. was never targeted specifically, people got the message from the Senator and changed its name respectively. Regardless of the name change, K.M.F. never lost it original essence, Donahue’s pastime. And the name change now allows players to play K.M.F. in all types of atmosphere, ranging from weddings to preschool school. Less than a year after the publicizing of K.M.F., this game has expanded to Boston’s neighboring cities. At the time, Ms. Porcella has no disclosed plans to spread K.M.F. statewide or nationally. # # +Live stream For a short time this live stream very good worked: 192.5.109.51/ostn_foxnews.asx It´s not pay tv and it´s not illegal , but the access is now blocked. Can someone get this to work again? +Added the NIST quotes +Date Clarification How could the first and second hotels have burned down on the same day? Year and all? This is inaccurate, an obvious oversight. Perhaps someone can provide some clarity to this article by researching the correct dates of the fires. +Dont really like the liberals either, Too much lefty rubbish leaves us all poor. +Ths user has decided to move on with his POV pushing and vandalism. He has to be blocked. 77.42.190.154 +Edit request on 4 December 2011 hello, I've just become a bona fide member of weki and I am going to make a donation, first here, i live 6 miles from Gads Hill, we have a large sign telling about the 1st MO. train robbery taking place there by Jesse and four members of his gang on Jan.31 1874. It's in your Gads Hill info. about how the place got its name from Charles Dickens Hometown,but not here, please but us in along with the others because its just as famous, just overlooked, thank you. +) Excellent answer, you show sound judgement as always. Answer the questions, add your acceptance, and make live at your convenience: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dalbury. ?!? +Sο I wаs in the grοcery stοre the οther day, and I fοund sοme nice аnаl lubricant fοr Indiаns. Would you like some? +Conclusion: The capacity of a barrel of tradable crude oil is 42 gallons (159 liters) as dictated by custom or convention and not necessarily by statute or legislation. +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Music of China. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk) +If you want to promote it to GA, I'd take it to WP:PR. +" This is not a debate. ""Persuading"" people is not how wikipedia works - or else everything would be edited via mob-rule. The reasoning behind inclusion is not sufficient, and just saying ""undue"" is not particularly persuasive. I've responded to every dispute rather meticulously and editors seem to just add more reasons why it should be gone. The BBC recognized the allegation, notable 3rd party organizations were involved, and all of this was covered by reliable sources. How this is undue...I do not know. " +Pelasgian , pre-greek origin of Zeus Homer refers to him as Pelasgian Zeus. Why there is no mention of the Pelasgian origin of Zeus. Much earlier than the arrival of the doric tribes in nowadays Greece? +September 2011 (UTC) Lulz, at Vanisaac! Racists and bigots not welcomed here, please do not write on my talk page ever again Unless Nelson Mandela apologizes to his prison captors, then maybe I owe Valenciano an apology. As far as I'm concerned, I'm done with the matter entirely, but if you have any more funny jokes, please, leave them here! 05:18, 14 +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Elena Coraima, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- ! +so you admit you recuitying to push you pov and then try and change the subject. man you shoud not edit +I will accept this block, but I can't begin to understand how Big Dunc has not been reprimanded for his behaviour (Baiting, tagging, bullying and intimidation) When I return, I'll stay out of his way if he's stays out of mine. +" == Thanks dude! I love you! == Yeah thanks for ""Nominating"" my artcile. I really appreciate your kindness beyond measure! I would like to announce I am ""Nominating"" you for something as well! It's the ""Dick of The Entire Year"" award! You and Al Gore are pretty likely winners so keep an eye open for that! Of course, as long as you aren't too busy having a blast ""Nominating"" things already. Cya!" +" LOL - I have been preoccupied with developing my website, but check in here on a daily basis. (And have been energetically scraping all the stamp images out of commons - Germany completeness/quality very impressive!) Anyway, on Dunnigan, I don't have much opinion on ""reference"" vs ""note"", anybody looking for sources will find them just as easily in either section. " +No problem I;m still licking my wounds from my last encounter so when I saw what you were doing I though I would shield you from friendly fire. +Help me convince people to produce citations Hi, thank you for your help with the FAC Forth. I have posted a help request to User talk:Spangineer#Help me convince people to produce citations, please have a look and I hope you will be able to help me. +"Are you here? • Talk2Me " +" Threaten to veto I don't really see why that's there. Maybe if there were actually an article about, or with information on threats to veto, but it just links to the article for the word ""threaten"". I'm removing it, I guess you can put it back if you think there's a good reason for it to be there, but it just seems silly to me. 65.78.144.186 " +":::""WP:DTTR is an essay."" I didn't say anything about WP:DTTR. I pointed out what is a practice according to members of the community, something I would not merely dismiss out of hand as you seem to do. ""At what point does an editor here pass your threshold for what constitutes a non-newbie?"" As for Delta/Triangle (sorry, I don't know how to make triangles on my keyboard), I concluded at the time that he was a newbie for the reasons I mentioned above. It was an explanation of my perception at the time, and not some type of value judgment. But if you really want an answer to your question, I'd say an editor is no longer a newbie when they have a reasonable command of how Wikipedia works, such that they do not make false accusations of copyright infringement, make a point of communicating with image uploaders, and familiarize themselves with the right way to communicate with members of the community. ""If you believe images should be retained without there being a rationale for that use present..."" Thank you for making it clear that you either are not reading my messages, or are being deliberately churlish. I didn't say anything about images being retained without a rationale. I already explained clearly above the matter regarding the rationale, and if you're either too illiterate or too lazy to read and comprehend this, then perhaps you should not engage me in discussion. I made the edit summary that I thought was appropriate, as I'm quite tired of obnoxious deletionists like Triangle who make false accusations and no attempt to communicate with others, as well as persistent liars like yourself who think repeatedly putting words in other people's mouths constitutes ""discussion"". If you don't like my edit summaries, then tough shit. " +FYI: 115.x range of Ip addresses usually belong to Reliance Netconnect users all over the country. This is the nth time that User:Samaleks is making such allegations to mislead admins and other editors. Hence requesting you to please clarify his allegation +Wikipedia COI policy Chip: you probably don't remember me; a decade and a half ago, we used to argue with hard-right conspiracists on Usenet and you cited my work in the area. You probably agree with me a lot less these days now that I debunk trial lawyers instead of the lunatic right, but you may want to weigh in at this discussion, where some highly-placed administrators are suggesting that the fact that I'm employed by a thinktank per se prohibits me from editing articles within my area of expertise. The effect would be to bar honest editors like me or you and reward editors that hide their affiliation and have no intention of complying with Wikipedia NPOV policy. +" Ha Ha other pepole who use this IP address and make so called ""good"" edits (witch means if you dont kiss the pepole who own the pages IE: Eternal Pink masamage and other puffs own sailor moon pages you get banned)" +(UTC) Yes. That is 100 percent true. Freyberg wanted to, but was prevented. Also, my father actually fought at the Maleme aerodrome. He said they were actually winning, and were ordered move down to the beaches for evacuation, British planes came overhead and dropped leaflets telling them this. I had a number of relatives there, and all say that it was an unmitigated defeat for them. 16:36, 9 March 2009 +" The available information is that many people in the West think Chinese people is one ethnic group or sometimes they don't want to distinquish among them because there are too many ethnic groups. Otherwise how can you explain the ""Ethnic Asian"" thing? These are just general terms. " +Nasrallah was born and raised in Burj Hammoud, the armenian quarter of bairuth and not in the southern part. Wikipedia needs to correct this part in his biography. +. Ah, this brings back memories of when you were carrying water for Brian G. Crawford. Why not be upfront about your agenda here? +I did'nt vandalize anything. Faggot. 166.248.64.163 +Okay, then he isn't an idiot, just a dense person. Gute Nacht. +Oh, and a request You may not know that Corensearchbot is not at this point able to warn individuals if they do not already have article talk pages. If you clean an article where the contributor was not warned (I see this happened at Yokohama Country & Athletic Club), could you please explain the copyright policies to them? This is important, obviously, to keep them from doing it again, when Corensearchbot might not notice. ) I'll let this one know. This is jut a request for future. (talk) +" Ukitake's has one sealed, and transforms into a pair when he releases, and it's still counted as a ""pair."" Kazeshini is the same way. That's the only part of your post that I'm going to respond to; the rest is fancruft. 207.80.142.5 " +What then of the almanac function of lists? I know I have seen reference to some such role wikipedia plays in that manner. +" If there is a published source that says Merv was gay, then you can edit in that he was gay and cite the source. Deciding for yourself whether the source that someone else cited is not ""reliable"" is original research, and is prohibited. You may not delete factual statements that are backed up by source material, simply because you say the source is unreliablethat itself is a factual assertion that needs to be backed up with sources. Further, if you do this without siomilarly checking the ""reliability"" of all other cites in the article and deleting teh unreliable and deleting those without cites, then you are obviously enforcing a point of view, and you have violated NPOV. So, if you really think a cited source is unreliable, especially one in support widely acknowleged fact that ol' Merv was gay, then you had better put the kettle on because you have got your work cut out out for you. Then, of course, you'll have to go back and check all the cites on all the entries you have ever contributed to. Seems much better to find a ""reliable"" source that says Merv was straight, Geuss you'd still bett get that kettle on. " +" Troubling aspects of the artiicle as it exists right now 1) I believe if Eric Altermann is to be accorded the prestige of being associated with msnbc.com, it should be noted that he is a blogger for msnbc.com. I say that because I found conservative columnist and author Michelle Malkin referred to as a blogger in another article and I do believe that's meant to diminish the value of her statement. So, again, yes. We HAVE to see the forest for the trees. No one article in Wikipedia exists in a vaccum. There has to be a baseline standard and I reject any argumentation that suggests implies or directs that if 'I don't like that article, go change it.' Instead, one way or the other (and I don't care which way) liberals and conservatives have to be characterized by the same fair measuring stick. 2) This is new. It's from Conason: ""Conason goes on to point out that Coulter's critical nature is blunted by her pre-assumed opinions, making many of the conclusions she draws irrelevant to the actual nature of her arguments."" Wow! That seems a little unfair just hanging out there like that. I propose either eliminating it or...and I hate this approach as much as the next guy...scotch-taping a quote after that which refutes this obvious cheap-shot. 3) This is old. The McVeigh section, as should be no surprise to anyone who's followed my work here, is troubling. Let's start with this quote: "" She was willing to characterize members of the Branch Davidians at the Waco compound as ""harmless American citizens"" [6] even after the survivors of the raid and subsequent immolation of the group by their leader were convicted."" Well, some Waco compounders were convicted of something or another. But the fact is that there WERE mostly innocent victims of David Koresh in that compound. It's unbalanced to just add the tag line about conviced Davidians without acknowledging what I GUARANTEE you Ann was referring to, which were the overwhelming number that were innocent. This quote is also troubling: ""Timothy McVeigh made similar criticism as partial justification for his bombing."" Well, McVeigh had LOTS of reasons for his bombing. But who cares what a madman thinks? And if you do, then I understand he also had some uncomplimentary things to say about the Bible. Therefore, if we are to include this in Coulter's section, I say we include it's compelement in Bill Maher's article. It would go something like this: ""Naher has frequently criticized the Bible calling it a 'bunch of fairy tales' and claiming 'God doesn't write books.' Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh made similar criticism as partial justification for his distrust of Christianity, though the Bible has been widely criticized throughout history."" Whady'a say? (Much more on this section later.) 4) Racism is not the same as being anti-Islamic terrorists that want to kill Americans for supporting Israel etc. To title Ann's comments on Islamic Radicals as allegations of racism seems dishonest to me. 5) Did Ann really say that ALL women are ""not as bright"" as men'? Some editor in Wikipedia wants us to think so. I say this quote be taken out until we get confirmation of her whole statement in context. Now, I know for a fact that Ann is only half-joking when she argues women should not be allowed to vote so she is far from imune when it comes to suggesting she holds less-than-boilerplate-feminist views. But this quote supposedly out of H & C seems like it's probably another smear. Again, if proven wrong, I'll gladly man up and stand corrected. But, unitl I'm proven it wrong, it should be excised in my view. More later... " +":Perfectly fine - we'll appreciate your contributions either way. Keep up the great work! 111 " +REDIRECT Talk:Boeing B-47 survivors +" ""Arguing with idiots: It's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it's victorious.""" +(WikiGames1 ) I think i shall keep my current username after review. Thank you for all the help you have given me ) +"==Notability of Michael capponi== A tag has been placed on Michael capponi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -WarthogDemon " +" On http://www.meanspeed.com, under the side bar ""Graphs"" there are sets of examples: Under BPM List, there are over 10,000 examples of the precise speeds of popular music pieces from every genre. Under Charts, there are 144 visual examples in histogram form. Moreover, on the sidebar, if you choose ""Blog,"" the archived materialseasily navigableyield over 1,000 examples. Methodology is included in detail for testing yourself, which is *most* encouraged. Keep in mind, I am aware that the navigation system on meanspeed.com is not the best-so I hired the besta webmaster from Seattle who began work on a much friendlier, easy to navigate and understand sitea project he begun on Thanksgiving and will be up in a month. The meanspeed.com that appears now is a considerable improvement over the original August 2004 version, as many have noted. What I am calling Meanspeed 2.0 will be that much better. And OF COURSE, love to hook up with iTunes. So said, the site is well, documented, I have letters from Dr. Manfred Clynes calling what a did a ""GOLD MINE OF DATA."" I want others to use it to control speed when they want. I'd like to get credit for the discovery. So said, it is a pattern in natureI did not invent it, did not make a gadget out of itit simply is. I long for the day when people see that the ""theory"" is as try as ""water is wet"" or ""the sun rises in the east."" Again, thank you for your consideration, and please send any suggestions to meanspeed@gmail.com. Sincerely Ian Andrew Schneider" +Oppose Subject alone is noteworthy. 72.45.254.78 +A tag has been placed on Ken zuckerman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" quite inflammatory, right? I was not discussing that to cause an argument. How could you know? Are you a psychic? Again, I use IQ (i.e. the value I estimated) as a criterion for assessing the user's ability to be an admin or his ability to produce a valid vote on RfA. It is a nonsense, but I find the criterions for most of the oppose votes equally laughable. And I didn't disrupt wikipedia to make a point, thus I didn't violate WP:POINT. I have the same rights as the other editors, and saying that ""he didn't pass my IQ test"" is not the same as if I was saying ""he is stupid"", thus this is no personal attack. Pure logic, if I say a didn't pass my test because it's not bigger than 10, it doesn't mean that a is lower than 5. Thus, a feels offended only if it wants to feel offended. Got that? ackoz " +" Attempt to delete Pederasty category Editors here may be interested in the following: * Category:Pederasty LGBT Category on one of the three main forms of homosexuality, with close to one hundred and fifty articles, is seen as ""serving no educational purpose"" and having ""no meaning."" Second time this deletion is attempted. CfD log 2006 February 5" +Picture on article Can someone please put a better picture of Madonna at the top of the article? That one is rather poor. I tried to change it, but it was reverted. +Dogmatic The use of the word dogmatic in relation to the Jesus Bloodline should be used in the same way that the word is used in relation to Christianity. The objection to the usage of the word can only be made by those who are sympathetic to the Jesus Bloodline as a historical fact. This is quite obvious. The removal of the word is unwarranted. Please do not alter this heading and integrate it into another discussion thread. It will otherwise be reverted. +Polygamy I'm not personally expressing an opinion as to who — you, or the IP editor — is right (or righter) in this dispute, but it does seem to me that there has got to be a better solution than the current revert war. +The article had a great deal of work in the first place! As far as I am able to determine, it appears to have been deleted by a British editor out of national arrogance or political hostility. +" Take your time Please take your time. Just one more pshyco communard off of wikipedia. I know you will revert this though. But why do you revert? To hide the truth? To censor stuff you don't want people to think? Go ahead, keep up the Totalitarian spirit. But Bishonen, please take your time on your ""Wiki-break"". Crack open a book. Drink some ""fabulous"" coffee. But feel free not to express your Communistic Ideas on Wikipedia for a while. I am afraid to say however, that you can say whatever you want, because I am a strong believer in Democracy. " +But please note you are supposed to respect the citation style the article already uses, not use one style the whole time. See WP:CITEVAR. +Bottom Line: Don't start nothin', won't be nothin'! +GOOD FOR YOU I was hoping to find an email for you, but couldn't. Thus, I will comment here. You look pretty young for being so sharp (just kidding). I am an EE, as well as an attorney, but am an old fart. I was banished from Wiki as a result of Ted Frank's false statements and relentless (and false) attacks on me for what? Because he disagreed with my edits. He also defamed me on WIkipedia, and threatened my husband and me with litigation outside of Wikipedia - the threat was wholly frivolous and a bully tactic. We told him to go for it, and we would make him look like a fool. We never heard from him again. For a right wing nutcase so against litigation, he surely is quick to make bogus threats of litigation. Interesting. I tried to explain to the Wiki clique what actually happened, but got nowhere. That was shortly before the corporate shills editing Wikipedia were discovered. Anyway, I am very glad to see someone held Frank to account, and protested his unbelievably biased edits. I had never before encountered an AEI staff, and dont ever want to again. He is a pompous jerk, ruthless, mean and stoops to any level to smear anyone who does not promote his agenda. My experience with Wikipedia was such that I would never want to edit again. Not worth it. But good for you and some who are able to expose those kind of editors for who they are. Maybe there is hope for Wikipedia, but I would not hold my breath. +Here we go again *sigh*.. read the article Constituent country. I suggested you do this because it is pertinent to this discussion we are having, and there are verifiable sources contained within it. If you feel there needs to be reference to those same sources in this article, then feel free to copy the references from it into this article, and into the articles on England, Scotland and Wales also. +I know that, I mean the three characters shown in Bobobo's assumption. +Bach featurification project Hi, it occurred to me that we ought to have a stunningly good article on Bach. I see from the edit history that you've done some sterling work there, so I was hoping that you could a) suggest some improvements, and/or b) help with making a References section, which we would need to get it featured (I assume that some or all of the current Further reading and External links sections have been used as references, but I don't know which). Thanks, 1 09:01, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC) +" * Why do you use the * to preface any reply you make? The standard method of indenting is the . Not the *. It's really jarring.— (竜龙) " +Deletion you are horrible, you are deleting notable websites. you should be deleted because you aren't notable, i don't know anything about you either +" What point am I trying to prove, in your imagination? I am correcting poor writing and will continue to do so. The wording of the sentence ""Coldplay's early material was seen as reminiscent..."" is just plain bad writing, because it doesn't say WHO saw it as reminiscent, nor why we should give such credence to this person's opinion. If you want to insert opinions into articles, you have to specifically state WHOSE opinions they are and defend why they're worth pushing so prominently within an article. Take the matter to an admin if you don't believe me. " +Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (?) +Okay, I do understand what you mean, but I did this because his exact date of death is already wikified at the very beginning of the article, hence. Extremely sexy +Javier Hernandez national team goals list removed I would like to know for sure why Javier Hernandez's national team goal list was removed. I feel like it was because there's no proof that he scored those goals with Mexico. I have found a source that has all his goals with the national team here it is http://www.rsssf.com/miscellaneous/jhernandez-intlg.html I hope this is enough to bring back his national team goal list because all the other players have it. +It seems to me that when creating this page, someone took the lead from Monk's page, which does the exact same thing. But Monk committing the same crime makes me feel no better about Psych. Any objections before I delete the column? +Hello, Mr. Nady. I was wondering when you'd show up and edit this article. Your 'anonymous' comment above seems to indicate that you think the Elem will build a casino on the island. I seriously doubt this will happen, it would be far too costly. I am reverting the text. Have a nice day. +She has also given no indication that she as the incumbent MP will not re-contest her seat, so it's a lie to add her under retiring MPs. +Thanks, Michael. Do you have an ED account? +Nuclear, the above is NOT how u cite the article. U MUST cite the original source. Do it like this >>> Yarri article 1879 in ABC Online http://www.abc.net.au I think ABC (it would have originated at ABC Riverina) got it out of Butchers book though, in which case, all three cites must be there as per above, with one added. The original cite goes in italics, then the next is underlined, then the next something else. All three must be noted though. If ABC got it straight from the original paper at Gundagai Library, then no need to cite Butchers book but MUST cite its original source. +7th Edition publication date? Hi, any announcements or speculation when the Shorter 7th edition will be published and sold? We could add a paragraph to the entry! Thanks +" According to these rules each of you are in violation which is my point exactly. Look, I exspect censorship from a Marine/Gov't loyal contributor. Especially in the current political environment where wire taps are viewed as Protective, internet privacy is irrelevant, a president can invent and enforce any law he chooses, and Guantanamo is synonymous with ""due process"". Hell, by those standards, I should be thankful for ""censorship"" as the new ""Liberty"". Well as Joe Lieberman has shown us, ""times they are a changin'."" Don't understimate creativity. That is where the conservatives always lose. They are virtually incapable of creativity. It is why Hollywood is so ""left & democratic"" as they are the creative types and tend not to have the same limitations as our red faced, red party friends. Read my edit and contribution history and see just how many times as I have been called names or disparaged by conservatives and other editors, but I have never opted to just ""rat"" them out for reverting, or editing in an opinion. I got balls to big for that, but it never fails to amaze me how quickly you guys run from a conversation you can't win, and how often you beg for the help of your mommy or daddy admin. Is that the semper fi tradition? Call daddy when you can't argue a point? I have come to expect conservatives to consistently censor thoughts and ideas they disagree with. Historically you guys also burned books, authors, and speakers as a first action rather than pretend to offer debate. I have always felt a bit of pity at that being the first step and not a last resort but, like the Iraqi's throwing rocks and blowing themselves up, you gotta use what limited tools you have available and in this case, I guess that means calling for ""admin"" help when you get in a tight spot? Semper Fi: Always Faithful ""to take the easy route""! Someday, you will grow a backbone " +" Premiere Films Incorrectly Listed There are several films listed as being premiered during the inaugural festival, but were fact not even filmed until years later. Specifically: Spider-Man 3 (2007) & The Avengers (2012) Either both films have been included lacking any chronologic distinction from the earlier premieres, or the sectin/edit's author included the two films by mistake. Regardless, reference to both should be removed in order to absolve any confusion created by mismatched festival dates; Or alternately, with proper citation, follow the selections from the debut festival with examples premiered during later dates. Another possibility, given the proper source(s), would be the addition of a single table (or more depending on design and format) of films first shown as part of Tribeca, grouped by year of appearance, and sorted alphabetically (speaking of which, it seems about half the inaugural premieres included appear to be absent from the linked source at the end of the list. Someone find a proper citation or these should go. Source:[6] http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06115/684768-254.stm) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.56.65 " +heyla me. I am me lol. Hope i have fun. +Black Bat I'm mystified how this was an abuse of dabs. If the pulp character deserves an article (as you imply), then we would need a dab whether the article exists yet or not. I changed the page because I was hoping to find information on the character. There was none. I suppose I can make a stub if you prefer, but changing the dab back to a redirect was not helpful to anyone seeking information. It'll still require disambiguation, you know. +" Right. So, my comments are first removed and then archived and deemed ""irrelevant"" without any logical explanation. I'm sorry but I couldn't have given a more polite response to that sort of behavior. I'm not a diplomat. " +Other Assignments John C Shumate was my Uncle and my fathers Uncle so I 've heard a few stories from my Dad. I've heard the story written here but working from back in the early days towards the present I've been told that John C Shumate may have been part of the crew of and flown in an observation aircraft as an observer. Not sure what type aircrft. I have a photo of him in his flight suit holding a machine gun. At some point he did become a Pharmacist as this article stated. He did do this type of work in civilian life as stated in a newspaper article I have reporting on him and the incident in which he recieved the silver star. From the stories I heard from my father, it sounded like John C Shumate separated from the military, opened a pharmacy and at some point went back into the military. My father mentioned a story about John C Shumate being in the Military MP's and in one incident taking a group of MP's to remove a bunch of squatters that had moved onto an old deserted military base. Have you heard of Richard Marcinko? He is the founder of Seal Team Six (Counter Terrorist) and Red Cell. Red Cell was a group of Navey Seals tasked with going to different Naval Bases to test security. They basically acted like terrorist, they tried to sneek onto Naval Bases, kidnap high ranking officials, plant explosive etc etc. The reason I mention this is because according to my Dad John C Shumate did this at some in the military. He apparently tested the security of an Air Base because as the story goes, he planted a fake explosive in a culvert(small tunnel) under a runway. Lastly I was told he was in Military Intelligence, but that's all I heard. 21 April 2013 Jeff Thomas161.51.11.2 +" Master I. A. M. of Zwolle I've expanded the titular article, but have exhausted my one source if you can expand this further it can go up for DYK. And, yes, I know it isn't the right artist. Thanks, derm " +" Hello. Please tell me what I need to do to get unblocked. I was not warned a single time that I cannot remind users of their pride in edit count by giving WikiLove. Again, I am not using bots (barely know what one is or does), only cut/copy/paste, WP:List of Wikipedians by number of edits. Says at WP:SPAM#Warning spammers: “If an editor spams numerous articles in a systematic fashion, they may be warned with {{subst:uw-spam4im}} as the only warning that they will receive before they are blocked”. I did not have a single clue why or in what way that what I did was spamming, thus “unknowingly spamming”. I have been contributing to many articles (I will specify if requested), and mean absolutely no harm to Wikipedia. I just didn't know that I cannot remind users of their pride in edit count by giving WikiLove in the form of {{subst:plate}}. I actually meant it in a quite good-humored way (“you are in <#>th place in most edits (<#>). ... Probably changed by the time you read this”). Thank you, user who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010. " +"== Template == Title Year Director(s) Producer(s) Qq in film in film and in film" +" First, allow me to quote from the opening sentence of WP:V: ""The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true."" (Emphasis mine) By making such a judgment and using it as criteria to affect the content of the article, you are committing WP:OR. Second, I seriously doubt that LS considers this to be literally true, as you are trying to imply. This is evidenced by his qualification of the statement with a ""may be"". This is merely a succinct way of making the point that WMC gains a great deal of influence through his activities here at Wikipedia. That is the main point and thrust of the article, and on that point yes, I truly believe that it is true. A great many lay people actually do rely on Wikipedia for at least gaining a basic understanding of the topics that they read here. GW should be no exception in that respect. And to the extent that Wikiepdia influences these people's opinions and the way in which they vote in the political sphere, which again is what LS is discussing (as opposed to the science), then yes WMCs contributions for his side of the debate as well as his maligning of his opponents in their BLPs (as LS alleges) clearly could have a significant impact. Your mileage may vary on the assumed impact of Wikipedia in this context. " +go fuck yourself you fucking bitch +All sources seem to indicate that the first practical solutions to anti-aliasing were invented Frank Crow, computer graphics pioneer (who incidentally works for nVIDIA these days), in 1977. Earliest reference I could find was: The Aliasing Problem in Computer-Generated Shaded Images, Communications of the ACM, vol. 20(11), pp 799-805. Nov. 1997. Of course I've also seen mentions of work done at the Architecture Machine Group at MIT in 1972, but I have not seen any references to published papers. 23:06 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) +For comparison the Liberator has a squadron listing. +Strongly agree. Furthermore, P&T; make the typical mistake of judging someone outside the context of their historical time and place. No one is claiming Gandhi revolutionized relations between men and women, so it's disingenuous to bash him for a perceived lack of effort towards women's rights. Gandhi's fight was on another front. If he was a hypocrite, so was everyone else in his day. Big deal. Not notable here. +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 99.146.98.120 +area All nude pics removed No need for anymore complaints about nude pics. I removed them all. User: Coconutfred73 9:45 6 June 2006 (UTC) +" I don't agree that the track record of American intelligence is ""wholly irrelevant"". Surely, the concept of reliability is based on experience. American intelligence brought us the WMDs, the Gulf of Tonkin incident etc. " +DVR Ratings: September 24 to November 25 Live+7 DVR playback data from September 24 to November 25, 2012 - What follows are top 30 shows with the greatest added viewership season to-date via the DVR: Modern Family (ABC): 12.60 to 17.04 million (4.44 million), Revolution (NBC): 7.95 to 12.35 million (+4.40 million), The Big Bang Theory (CBS): 15.86 to 19.96 million (+4.10 million), Elementary (CBS); 11.23 to 15.03 million +3.80 million), Castle (ABC): 10.41 to 14.04 million (+3.63 million), Grey’s Anatomy (ABC): 9.85 to 13.46 million (+3.61 million), NCIS (CBS): 18.19 to 21.72 million (+3.63 million), Person of Interest (CBS): 14.38 to 17.73 million (+3.35 million), Criminal Minds (CBS): 11.82 to 14.97 million (+3.16 million), The Mentalist (CBS): 9.62 to 12.74 million (+3.12 million), Hawaii Five-O (CBS): 8.23 to 11.35 million (+3.12 million), Once Upon a Time (ABC): 9.76 to 12.84 million (+3.08 million), Nashville (ABC): 6.84 to 9.88 million (+3.04 million), Glee (Fox): 5.69 to 8.73 million (+3.04 million), Revenge (ABC): 8.22 to 11.23 million (+3.01 million), Blue Bloods (CBS): 10.69 to 13.64 million (+2.95 million), CSI (CBS): 10.57 to 13.40 million (+2.83 million), Grimm (NBC): 5.28 to 8.08 million (+2.80 million), NCIS: Los Angeles (CBS): 15.71 to 18.41 million (+2.70 million), Vegas (CBS): 11.68 to 14.32 million (+2.64 million), Chicago Fire (NBC): 6.33 to 8.89 million(+2.56 million), Bones (Fox): 7.19 to 9.70 million (+2.51 million), New Girl (Fox): 4.78 to 7.23 million (+2.45 million), Scandal (ABC): 6.27 to 8.66 million (+2.39 million), Private Practice (ABC): 5.17 to 7.48 million (+2.31 million), Two and a Half Men (CBS): 12.96 to 15.19 million (+2.23 million), Parenthood (NBC): 4.76 to 6.94 million (+2.18 million), 2 Broke Girls (CBS): 9.40 to 11.56 million (+2.16 million), Last Resort (ABC): 7.06 to 9.20 million (+2.14), The Good Wife (CBS): 9.54 to 11.65 million (+2.11 million) +" ""Ran deep"" What does the phrase ""ran deep"" mean within the meaning of the article? 69.255.250.110 " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pink Floyd. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' " +Oleynik Don't vandalize. +I posted this in the talk of 'god gene' Pentagon video on 'removing' 'god gene'. I dont know what to make of this? is this real or fake? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nADFJlAggnY +Sorry, I forgot that we wish to fill half the article with parenthetical dabs (this Cantonese, not the other one) and (here we mean the other Cantonese, not this one). That would be much better. +UtherSRG, the more you talk the more you highlight your inferiority. Consensus means nothing. Go ahead and block me, it won't matter. You are wrong. You know it, and I know it. All those other people who agree with you a wrong too, and they know it. +Certainly - just tell us when they're uploaded +You guys are fuckin idiots. It's Squeezit, thanks for nothing. +Lead paragraph The lead doesn't refers that the little girl and her siblings were left unattended in an unlocked, ground floor hotel room while the parents went to a restaurant. Any reader will think that she disappeared while staying with her parents in the apartment, and this wasn't what really happened. +LISTEN TO HIS SHOW. He constantly throws out Ethnic Slurs and calls for Assault against minorities. +Pretty cool huh!Genusus Godess of Earth marries Ou god of Heaven,Mikon,god of Friendship & twin brother of Zeau,Zeau,god of Intelligence & twin brother of Mikon,Redos god of the Oceans that lives in a cave,Korrotos,the god of War that marries Broket,Broket,goddess of Food and Fortune that marries Korrotos,Shkumbe,goddess of Love and Beauty,Child Genusus that marries both Mikon and Zeau. It needs some more on the couples but will do in the future. +contribs]]) I can't believe I forgot to sign! (I'm so ashamed...) -P lives [[Special:Contributions/Aervanath| +Well in that case you can't list what the episode parodies unless Matt or Trey say that. +He wrote it wrong, so you will defend him? Super lol. You need to turn into an adult too. This is serious, all wikipedia articles will turn into garbage if everybody thinks like that. Why the little brazilian can't fix the mess he did? +I am just asking you to put something I put a lot of time and effort into back +Putting a line over it doesn't make it less true. Stop harassing me. You are on thin ice as it is. +U R A FUCKIN MUSLIM ARENT U? +Thank you so much. What exactly do you think i need to add to the page? The only credit she has now is the Movie. How do I make it Credible? +Why do you love porch monkeys? +Pontillist, thanks for contacting me and for your efforts here. Jonathan Jones has supplied you with some useful information I see, but I'm happy to hunt out copies of Brasenose Nose via our Archivist. Is it just the 1983 one you're after or are there others at this stage? +You stupid, you are so damn follish. And the BMT Broadway Line page, when the north tracks of the Manhattan Bridge reopen on February 2004, the N trains was express and the W was local, but you switch it the opposite way. Read the History site on the BMT Broadway Line page and find at. +" WikiProject Ireland WikiProject Ireland Participants are requested to VOTE each month for their choice of Showcase Article and Showcase Picture.It only takes a minute - please participate! Scope and Motivation Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to Ireland. This page and its subpages contain their ideas; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there. The vast majority of this project was unashamedly ripped from another project: Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles, and the of this project extends recognition for the tireless work involved in formatting, text, policy and many other aspects by , and himself. For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices. This project has been created in an attempt to improve existing articles relating to Ireland, and to help with the creation of needed articles. It aims primarily to provide information in consistent format for articles on places in, or related to Ireland. On top of this, it aims to get the main Ireland article to featured status, whilst aiding the maintenance and improvement of the Ireland Portal. Northern Ieland has a population of approximately 1.7 million. One of the greatest aids in this project for assessment and improving of articles, are the logs found here Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Ireland articles by quality/1 and here Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Ireland articles by quality/2. Please take a look at the entries there as it will guide you on which articles need assessed, and will also guide you as to what might be necessary to improve individual articles. Articles and categories relating to Ireland are extensive and work needs to be/is being done across a multitude of areas. In order to gain the benefits of collaboration, please update this page with any relevant ""to do""s. Recent developments Belfast has been successful as the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography's collaboration of the month. For anyone who's interested in helping to get the article up to FAC standard, there are many resources and a guide available on the UK Geography Project page. This Ireland Project is currently being re-vamped in line with the Belfast one. Belfast has been nominated as the UK geography project's collaboration of the month. Please feel free to comment and add your vote of support. Participants eral Major pending tasks Modify WPNI template so that it follows the hierarchy structure found in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia. Update all templates to use include the new mapping function.   Add the new template to all Ireland-related articles' talk pages. '''''N.B. - please do not substitute the template, as any future changes to the template will not be updated automatically. On top of this, a substituted inclusion will not appear on the list of links that provides a guage for the size of the WikiProject and ultimately all articles within the Wik +"*he didnt say just ""genetics"", he said DESCENT (can you read ?). Where do you think you come from, a fuckin test tube ? Ask anybody, alot of your ethnic or cultural identity is inherited or passed down from you ancestors/family. Actually read what hes saying you dumbass, your personality/behaviour, your genes, you physical appearance and for many people alot of other cultural customs like language you get from your family since they raise you. The common descent of a group of people is where alot of this comes from. Obviously when you live in a a community with others of this heritage, that identity lasts longer. Thats why on average Irish (not Scots-Irish), Italians, Germans, Blacks/Africans, Asian, Native Indians, Spanish/Hispanics keep more of their identity longer here in the USA then other peeps like English and Scottish. You walk in my neighbourhood and say im only an ""ethnic American"" or somethin stupid like that, you get knocked the fuck out. You people need to wake the fuck up. " +Link restored. The url/link discrepancy at the linked page has apparently been fixed. 23:03, 10 April 2006 (EDT) +Razor® Products | Replacement Parts | Service & Repair | Help & Support | Contact | RipStik® Caster Board Copyright © 2003-2007 Razor USA LLC. All rights reserved. Razor®, RipStik®, Scream Machine®, Ground Force®, the A Logo Design and the Razor Logo Design are registered trademarks of Razor USA LLC and/or its affiliated companies in the United States and/or select foreign countries. Pocket Mod™, Sport Mod™, Dirt Rocket™, Rebellion™, Punk Rail™, Kiddie Kick™, Cruiser™, Bumper Buggie™, Pocket Rocket™, and Scuttle Bug™ are trademarks of Razor USA LLC. Privacy The COlective rulz your page and your ass bitch +The statement you reverted was: According to proponents, PLR has produced dramatic, rapid and permanent improvements in some clients who had spent years in conventional therapy.Woolger, Roger, Other Lives, Other Selves: a Jungian psycho-therapist discovers past lives, New York: Doubleday, 1987, ch 1, p. 15. ISBN 0385237162. The book cited is by a PLR practitioner (a Jungian psychotherapist) that has been published in 5 English editions, notably Doubleday and Bantam, plus German (Hugendubel) and Spanish. So how is this not a reliable source for the statement of what PLR practitioners claim PLR has done? This should be regardless of your opinion whether the claim is correct. There are also counter claims about the efficacy of PLR which should be included in the article, for example: M Schröter-Kunhardt (1996). Reinkarnationsglaube und Reinkarnationstherapie: Eine transpersonale Fiktion. Transpersonale Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 67-83 reprint. (Belief in reincarnation and reincarnation therapy: a transpersonal fiction). I think this article needs to be balanced but the source you are objecting to is a reliable source for what PLR practitioners claim, which is all that the sentence states. +I suggest you google the pictures of Mehmetcik 1 and HK-416. There, you will see the differences between these two rifles. By the way, HK-416 is not a product of german super duper engineering either as it was developed in collaboration with USA. You can not use 'will' and 'adoptED'^in the same sentence. Please be careful with the grammar. +" this isn't a personality fashion show. it's about articles — articles into which you attempted to insert your POV through the use of your ""authority"" demonstrated by an article allegedly written by you. you can (and will, i'm sure!) bring up 5 million subjects other than that, but reality doesn't bear out your claims. for example, this link demonstrates the material i added in only a 5 day period during june 2005. see all that new material on the right? i added every word. think that doesn't constitute the bulk of the article? well, it doesn't matter, does it? what matters is that you didn't write any of the material you stole for your attempt to pull a fast one on katefan. have something more to say? take it up with somebody who edits articles here still. i don't. i left because material i worked very hard on got trashed, and i often ended up spending hours educating coddled morons (explained in detail above). then today i find out my work was also stolen and thwacked with your name! ROFL. icing on the cake! well, it didn't work. ""your article"" is in the bit bucket, so apparently somebody else (somebody you apparently respected — yesterday anyway) also thought you stole the material for the article. " +the fife shuffle aahh dismas surely you are also the parton of the enternally bewilldered, thanks for your prompt answer, i will get the shuffle shuffling soonest, in honour of you removing a barrier (which only i saw) would you care to suggest a favourite track for me to download? much in your debt st jude ( ) +File:Coats of arms of the Republic of the Congo.gif listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coats of arms of the Republic of the Congo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +|decline=You appear to be disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Please stop wasting our time. If you'd like to contribute constructively, get a different name. — John Reaves +A tag has been placed on MumboJumbo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +"::::If there is a credible link to a US Gov't definition for the capacity of a tradable barrel of oil, then it should be referenced in the main article. As the article states, there are several definitions for the capacity for a barrel (42 or 55 gallons). I highly doubt that the US gov't is or was responsible for defining the capacity of a barrel of crude oil used for commerce (or that it is a world-wide legal requirement to use a US-gov't definition) but if there is any such legal requirement then again a reference should be stated in the main article. To say that NYMEX has ""no legal right to define measurement units"" is a bogus argument. What NYMEX has is the right to define or specify units that are pertinent to trade. If NYMEX states that oil is to be traded in terms of barrels, then it is not ""illegal"" for NYMEX to state the capacity of this thing called a ""barrel"" in terms of unambiguous STANDARD units, or to point to an authoritative source (authoritative as far as NYMEX is concerned) that defines the capacity of a barrel. " +" I don't remember being asked to tutor you either, so I won't try. I'm only trying to inform you. Regarding the content, I agree with its removal. A government making unsubstantiated accusations at a country they're at war with may be ""official"", but it's unimportant for an article about a weapon. The type of missile used in this alleged attack is of no importance, and the fact that they even mentioned the Iskander specifically points to obvious political motivations in the accusations (ie. your're using your shiny new hi-tech weapon to destroy civilian infrastructure, shame on you!) This sort of political bickering has no place in the article in my opinion. There are specific articles and sections to put government propaganda. Therefore I've removed the content again, and I ask that you please refrain from edit warring any further and discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. " +"Edited to Add: Quoting your previous post: ""While you probably didn't intend any offense"" And responding: Fuck, yeah, I intended offense. Your officious assholish attitude is highly offensive to me. I REALLY INTENDED TO OFFEND YOU, asswipe. If I didn't succeed in pissing you off and offending you then I failed. Bite me, moron. " +There is a fine line between promoting and elaborating tau. +" February 22 Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.  Satori Son " +" conflict of interest " +According to the guy who tweeted it, the article just talks about how they need more supplies and food though. +, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Lol not gonna help anymore... Penis Brown did his (blow)job... 23:08 +Are you, by any chance, the same editor as +Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Hi Roger, can you supply the clue that yiu created for this word, please? +" =Template One last problem, between Ottoman Dynasty-Occupation and Occupation-Republic there's a black line, but this line is not seen between ""Vassals of Seljuks""-""under the Mongols"" and ""Saruhan""-""Ottoman dynasty"". These lines seperate different periods of history of Turkey, so it's critical. Can you add only these 2 lines?" +" I wish I would become an administrator, just because the unlikely Jak creates problematic sockpuppets. I think I could block Jak indefinitely if this sockpuppet situation continually worsens. I hope I can be a nice, content-improving admin. |(C""<) " +collegial website my ass. what have you ever done that is collegial? have you left one wikilove? have you helped one newbie to edit? i see your playing enforcement for your new meatpuppet. go circle jerk with him, not me. +See Wikipedia:Changing username. — (Talk | contribs) +" Image:The Arms of Sir Robert Bell d. 1577 Grail Crest.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Arms of Sir Robert Bell d. 1577 Grail Crest.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. " +]] [[User talk:Bobblewik/units of speed +" Koons accuses his ex-wife of ""abducting"" their child - that is the ""personal interest in child abduction"" the sources talk about. Abduction is a crime, no court has convicted his ex-wife of abduction, and she has lawful custody of their child, in spite of the large amount of money spent by Koons to fight it (though, it seems, he is far more reluctant to spend his money on child maintenance). " +" Petrarchan may well be right, but I think Gonna deserves more of a justification for the reversion than ""too many errors"" and ""changes weren't bad, but not enough of an improvement to justify new errors""'. Please remember that we're supposed to be working collaboratively. " +Category:Electric power in America Thank you for your notice of my work in the project: Category:Electric power by country. I agree it needs further developing. This, including the regional aspect, may also apply to some other Categories by country like Human rights by country. These are open opportunities for everybody. +help request Thank you a lot! It's so kind from you - Angela +To Vecrumba: It's vey disturbing the way you arbitrarily award legitimacy and illegitimacy to events and treaties. But as Illythr said, this is not the place to discuss this. +|unjustified accusation of edit warring led to escalation +Boing! said Zebedee , considering your note above , would appreciate to see your response . +Minor edit to fix links This article contained links to the Center for Mariconite Research Library, and articles within that library. That site is part of Geocities, and will go offline tomorrow, so I have corrected the links. They now point to a mirror of the website which will remain online when geocities closes.149.254.58.10 +woloves to take analld +" Now, for those who won’t read, let me try once more. 1. Gwen Gale has dominated the article “Death of Adolf Hitler” for years. 2. Gwen Gale is not informed about the “Death of Adolf Hitler”. She refuses to acknowledge the work of Sir Ian Kershaw, about who Wiki itself (no books needed) says “He is regarded by many as one of the world's leading experts on Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany and is particularly noted for his monumental biography of Hitler, which has been called ""soberly objective."" . She continues to use Bezymenski, a 1968 admitted fraud, as a source over numerous other authors. 3. Any time anyone will keep Gwen Gale away from “Death of Adolf Hitler”, serious scholars will fix it and get stars or whatever, Wiki will be accurate, and proud. 4. Any time anyone will keep Gwen Gale away from “Death of Adolf Hitler”, I and all my posts become moot. All I have ever wanted was to get the “popular press” out of what I consider a serious subject. " +Talk:Hebephilia#Karen Franklin Up for weighing in on the above linked topic? +Let the fight go on Have U no decency you have insulted my people, my nation and my ancestors and refute that fact that I AM WRONG, the one that lives in Ireland is wrong I DON'T think so. Yes you are a ballbag (scrotum or testacles) because you seem to think that i am going to lie down and take this crap without a fight becuase you have this notion in your head that you are wikipedia and that you think you know everything. I happen to have a degree in Irish history and poltics so don't try and preach to me on these matters. I think an apology is in order for your insults and disgraceful remarks. And finally spitting on the graves of irish people is exaclty what you are doing by saying that their sacrifice was in vain. I think wikipedia seems to be a a schoolyard and you seem to be the bully that thinks he knows all and I am the new kid standing up for the rights of the rest of the children. +REDIRECT Talk:Brazilian Internet phenomenon +I see you have no response, even after being shown wrong... +" Come on guys. The section on Turkey is highly biased and provides more space to the justification of Pelosi's attitude to the proposed bill on the so-called Armenian Genocide and doesn't give the other side to provide any justification why the Prime minister of Tuyrkey has negative attidue on this bill. I think that for the neuturality of this article, the section on Turkey shall be extended and editors shall give opportunity for the other side to justify why Pelosi is wrong on this issue. Otherwise, this section seems like an election platform of ms. nancy prior to elections. I have been trying to extend this section, but pro-Nancy editors and probably her office staff are deleting all my additions without any justification. Biased section on Turkey ""Turkey On October 11, 2007, regarding a proposed House resolution to label the 1915 killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks as genocide, Pelosi said that the measure would be brought to a vote because ""While that may have been a long time ago, genocide is taking place now in Darfur, it did within recent memory in Rwanda, so as long as there is genocide there is need to speak out against it..."" [27] Turkey's prime minister said that approval of the resolution would endanger U.S.–Turkey relations. [28]"""" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.172.72.6 (talk) Stop with the damn accusations of pro-nancy and elections. If you knew anything about American politics you would know how silly that sounds. You have been warned twice on your talk page to be civil and not use this talk page for a platform. You also have the ability to edit the page yourself, but I doubt you will be able to keep a neutral tone. Also, remember that this is a page about Nancy Pelosi and not about Turkey and and the Armenian Genocide. Turtlescrubber ""give opportunity for the other side to justify why Pelosi is wrong on this issue""? This is not the POV by Nancy Pelosi or US House of Representatives Committee, but a tragic event recognized by the most of democratic societies and countries. And surely this biographical article is not the right place for such an ""explanations of other side"" (simple denial of the anti-human crime). Andranikpasha Andranikpasha, your nickname expalins who are you? YOu are an armenianorigin person. Andranik indeed has been one ot he heads of the bloody Armenian militia killing Turks, Kurds and Azeris, with his terrorist acts has been the reason for the reaction of Kurds, Turks and Azeris after they returned from the war in 5 fronts. So your response is absolutly biased, because of your nationality and firm belief in an event that never occured or occurded only for the Armenian church who uses this so called armenian genocide to mobilzie armenians and prevent their assimilation. As to the fact this is not the page for the other side, this shows how much you are anti-democratic and biased on this issue. This is against the Wikip3edia neturality principle as well. You give one side an opportunity to jsutify her action, but the other side only one general and useless sentence. I wouldn't be surprised if you are a pro-Pelosi person. Please, don't accuse others with stupidity and etc. I know quite a lot about American politics and how it is run. I completed my studies in US. This is for your education and information. If I don't see any more jsutified response I will go an and extent the Turkey section and also create the Criticism section. Raman, Massachusetts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.172.72.6 (talk) The section is grossly biased in favor of Pelosi-s pro-armenian stance and justification. She wants to sell something which didn't happen due to funds she receive from the Armenian lobby. She wants to compare the armenian killings with those of Jews genocide and Rwanda genocide. She forgets following differences between these events. Nationalist Armenians were at war with the Turks in 1915 (both in Anatolia and Caucausus), and the Armenian generals and guerilla leaders who commanded them are still honored as Armenian heroes today. Military leaders like Generals Andranik Oznanian, Garegin Nzhdeh, Drastamat Kanahyan (“General Dro”), and Garo Pasdirmaijan (“Armen Garo”) are largely unknown to Americans whose knowledge of Armenian history is limited to the orthodox genocide literature, but well-known by Armenians. Here, again, the analogy to the Jews of the Holocaust simply does not fit. There are no statues to the Jewish generals who fought the Nazis in Germany in 1942-43, because there were none. And there is such a biased section on Turkey. the editor andranik, an armenian by origin, who carries the name of the armenian terrorist and nationlist milita head accuses +I think i should make some points also because i think what DR.K is doing , did succeed in confusing this whole situation a lot > 1) It was me vs Alexikoua , and as u can see on his talk page he arrogantly ignored what was said to him 2) Dr.K did only intervene after i opened the 3RR investigation , has no reason whatsoever to be here unless he is the same as Alexikoua ... after the 3rr was opened he reverted the whole article 3 times so that i would go to my 3rr and i would be accused as well . 3) Then he opened a separate 3RR investigation 4) Not only that but after that he opens another sock puppet investigation , when in fact you told him that there is already a 3rr so he can comment there ... ! Please do tell me don t you find his behavior very weird when in fact i was only having a dispute with Alexikoua ? For me personally them being the same person , has a high percentage of being a reality . He has been WP:HOUND me from the first moment . YOU ARE A WITNESS YOURSELF ( he has opened a 3rr investigation , reverted my edits in an article that i had opened a investigation for another user , did spam my wall with warning message although the 3rr was already opened , has opened a sock puppet account investigation in a separate thread as well ) All of these after he knew i opened a 3rr investigation for Alexikoua ... +, 18 April 2009 (UTC) My comment was not in reference to you Less, but to Grsz (who understood it as such and replied before removing his comment) who is depicting me here and elsewhere as unwilling to discuss things with him. This is demonstrably false as his talk page history shows. I have clarified my statement and I'm sorry that it was misunderstood. 18:25 +Just rephrase this message without your personal comments and in a NPOV manner. That should do. +" Specifically, I found all but one of the images in this gallery, having made a similar mistake a few days ago (see this message and it's safe to assume that the other image (the one of Fisichella and Sutil on scooters) is also from the website. I have tagged the images for speedy deletion on the Commons, and have removed them from use on Wikipedia.(talk) " +hi trextori12 ) I♥♥♥u girl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +" Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.(Deepu) " +News Worthy? Should this be in the news section on the Main Page? What do you think?? +Both indon and malaysian fan using laser indon fans started using laser in their home stadium againt malaysia n philipines.. they denies that they're cheating..but I've proof! please click the link below.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p3zESFR94g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TTnFzpRluc ~~Shah +been in common usage since the 27thcentury? where did the last 600 years go by? +Can you be more clear about the missing ones please? +to read your wonderful warning yesterday. Unlike you, I don't visit Wikipedia everyday. +Yes, Mr Fat was a stupidly drunken attempt at creating a new account following my wish to start afresh following the recent Arbcom debacle I was involved in under the original account. My first edit was relating to your comment that you were a self-confessed sockpuppeter, at the time I didn't realise you had made a joke account as a puppet. My sock worries are just on the high side at the moment following the case I referred to. Anyway, time to move on +" Morrison's ""Black President"" Phrase Was Obviously Not ""Taken Out Of Context"" When you compare her 1998 essay to her 2008 takeback, you will find that the woman is contradicting herself. By neutral comparission of the two statements, it is easy to assume that Ms. Morrison was only saying that remark to hype Obama's campaign. With regards to her takeback to her earlier essay about Bill Clinton being ""Our First Black President,"" the woman is a poor liar." +Should this page exist? I grabbed this off the requested articles page. I assume that this is what the requester meant. I'm not entirely sure if it fits in Wikpedia, though. +Maldivian language is not official or common and never referred as a language, Are you the regulaters of all languages in the world? I have seen your vandalisations on other languages you shouldn't be here and mess with what you're not good at you should mind your own business and go get educated yourself, and then come back to places like these to contribute. +Middayexpress|Middayexpress]] deserves a award for his contribution to the Somalia article and are you ethiopian ? +Nisbett holds a minority view whose position has been described as having 'virtually no chance of being true' by tertiary sources. +That only applies to small businesses - not to those who make 'special' contributions. I will leave this issue for a while however please note we are not happy at the way you allow others to publish material on our Drake Circus article. The link from it is an important feature of our online marketing activity so please do not even think about removing it. Incidentally please also refrain from associating my team with other contributors with whom we share nothing except the unfortunate fact that we are probably all from the same area with similar networks. We will be monitoring activity on our article and if necessary I will arrange for one of the editors to protect it again as I think its best in our respective interests that it is left alone. +, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Well I've done some more, including Stronhold. Someone already uploaded Tempest. Here's the difficult ones for me: Ice Age, Portal, Portal Second Age, Exodus, Avacyn Restored, Gatecrash, and Wizard's Maze. A lot of the Duel Decks, From the Vaults, and Premium Deck stuff will be challenging as well. All of these are ones I will not be touching for a long while. 20:23 +Copy of article Does anyone have a copy of the original (Löb and Wainer 1970) paper? I'd appreciate any help in getting a hold of a copy. Cheers, — +I agree with and suggest that we discuss this further here where I just wrote an explanation about this issue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Water_supply_and_sanitation_by_country#Closure_of_project_and_re-tagging_to_WikiProject_Water_.3F Thanks. +" So I replaced the single ""notable"" current WCNC employee with a link to the station site listing the entire on-air staff, and you reverted? By the way, the station slogans over the years can be sourced - I would recommend that you fact-tag them rather than removing them entirely. 67.197.243.87 " +" The NM constitution's language is not consistent with the belief that ""bear arm"" (or, at least, ""keep and bear arms"") only refers to warfare. Paraphrasing for clarity, ""...to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes,..."" More importantly, though, SMP's use of peaceful appears to be as a synonym for ""quiet"" as in ""quiet enjoyment."" " +OPPOSE. Wikipedia is not based on information that you think is appropriate to include. Try to be a bit more constructive when relating to other people's contributions. Thsi is factual information that others think is important to the article. +What is your problem. Everyone on the talk page agrees Under the Dome episode summaries should not be on that paged they should be moved. Don't threaten me, I don't care about a stupid rule. +" Re: Giovanni's mother (The Woman Boss) I see in a recent edit you made to Giovanni that you made a hidden (is that the word? I mean those tags that have the ""!"" sign in them and are visible only in the edit box) question concerning the bit in the article about Giovanni's mother. (i.e ""WTF is this?"") It's true that this is not exactly mainstream knowledge, so let me explain: In Japan, a ""radio drama"" (which as I understand it is basically a Pokémon episode without the animation) was produced, which was about the story of Mewtwo until the events of the first movie. Part of the radio drama was the short ""Birth of Mewtwo"" video that also exists in English. The story is narrated by Giovanni, who tells us about when Team Rocket was led by a very beautiful woman that he then identifies as his mother. This woman is referred to as On'na Boss, meaning the Woman/Female Boss. Jessie's mother Miyamoto, a TR agent, brings to her attention the existence of Mew from a recording in the Andes, and On'na Boss sends her to investigate. Miyamoto eventually finds Mew, but is subsequently lost in an avalanche and never heard of again. The story then continues with Giovanni's own attempts to find Mew one generation later, whose results we all know. Hope this cleared things up without being too long-winded! " +Oh no, no, no, no, I wasn't implying you were being uncivil; it was just a general comment about the nature of AfD. When I was a newbie, I was often thinking, man, when are they going to close this? It's a common complaint- note the AfD- or VfD, as it was then- on Autocunnilingus, where people were really getting annoyed. Et tu, Brute? +" I am not going to do biasing here but the info is well supported by source.""Sonia Gandhi once called him ""a merchant of death"" doesn't mean he is.Requirement or not is yet to be decided.Not a POV although. discutez " +I respect your wishes, and often have desired to do the same but cannot face the endless boring hours. You are one of the people I write for (I cannot see, or comprehend, the people who actually read the articles for information) and deeply regret seeing you go. Please remember the door does not lock behind you. Please continue to consider it an extended wikibreak. +" Sorry for the delay - browser froze up. He seems to have lost interest - one more and it's protected. (talk) " +In my best Nelson: HA-HA 83.170.111.154 +Please keep the discussion on your talk page - it's easier to follow and you don't have to post twice. - [[User_talk:Supadawg|Talk]] +"==Your edits to Sammy Sosa== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Speak your mind " +Oh, and this revert just sums up the dedication of this disruptive IP to do nothing but promote his cause. No idea, no clue, no competence, edit warring, block evasion, revert on sight, block, move along. +" Transclusion Limit this is what the rpoblem with transclusion of the coordinates as well hopefully this ex plain its, i can easily show this problem if the user who wants to see it is on when i m i just need to edit this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Episode_list/Time_Team to last version i had befor ethe current (talk - contrib) " +Sure! Both for you adapting it to the German Wikipedia and for me adding DM and Euro it. In fact, adding a new currency is pretty easy, although I think I'll change the structure so that individual currencies are stored in individual pages, for an easier maintenance. But first tell me: do these numbers take into account the change in currency, so that values in DM get automatically converted to Euros if I simply go multiplying year after year? Or will an input in DM also output in DM? Because I think the best thing is for currencies to not be converted, requiring the user to do a conversion by hand, as it would be quite difficult to keep track of which currency was valid for which year. Also, could you please provide me a list for Euro-only inflations? If I'm going to add the older DM, it's fair I also add the Euro itself in the same move. -) And what about Germany before 1951? Is data available? +Thanks for The Help Thanks for the help on The Secret History of the IRA page. WH. +i think you're a mean prick! you are the meanest of them all and I shudder to think you may have bred! +"== A barnstar for you! == The Graphic Designer's Barnstar sadf " +fuck you cuntard, cheeks baroni is a local figure up here, let his legend live on! -cheeks +" Let Define what is WP:COI and who falls under this tag For starters, the Education section, in the form that BenBurch is pushing is WP:POV as well as WP:GRAPEVINE and is clearly hearsay and with any read of the cites, will show this section is just unsubstantiated campaign rhetoric out of the Duckworth campaign brain trust. A brief read of the ""ZORN"" cite will show that to be the case to any honest review of them. NOW to the charge of WP:COI... I will cite the first principle which the the gang of that who rule over this political Biography can't use... ""...Pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest is not a personal attack."" WP:PA So, to point out a clear and demonstrable political conflict of interest is not a personal attack on an editor and or admin. I charge that is a HARD CORE PARTISAN DEMOCRAT and is in complete conflict with WP:COI as to his edits on a REPUBLICAN OFFICE HOLDER""S PERSONAL BIO. Poof of this is simply found in is edits on wikpeida as well as off wikipedia on sites like bens long history on democraticunderground.com Democratic Underground With all the nice stuff ben spews on the DU site, I don't want a guy like this writing a ""NPOV"" article about a Republican office holder with such views. I believe ben should recuse himself from any editing on republican articles on wikpeida, less his KNOWN partisan views creep in to his copy. Any reasonble person would not want his ""BIO"" edited by such a partisan editor like Ben. " +(click Sign your name:) In the narrowest sense, yes. They're different cookies. See the Realplayer privacy preferences. You can turn off the browser cookie in the browser's privacy preferences tab. +"::::::::::(Edit conflict, so pop it in here). People in glass houses.....! You want to see good citations for the claim that Phar Lap is a national icon in NZ. I want to see good citations for the claim that Phar Lap is a national icon in Australia. There are three sources given regarding the phrase ""a national icon in both countries"" which appears in the intro. Three of them are about New Zealand. None of them are about Australia. You were saying? " +-Havnt you got anything better to do with your camera than take picrures of wasteland and ragweed? Im nominating you as a Wikipedia asshole...Good luck with those vandals you sorry bastard.... +" ""Religious Views"" -" +Good point. I've made some edits to reflect your comments. Feel free to improve them if necessary. +Hello, you disgusting transsexual You are a grotesque blight upon the earth. Please kill yourself. +Hey Mutherlicker Make some good edits.137.240.136.80 +Um... I see a count of 3 in support of merging on the list above, and 3 for not merging. +March 2012 (UTC) 50/50 Why? Because if you merged all of the proposed article, it will be SIMPLY too long to be read so, if you want to merged it with these article, . 06:30, 11 +? How easy are they to understand between each other +I'm removing the neutrality tag until someone points out a specific area of POV. +Is this true? An anon added (part in italics) +Didn't even notice Dana, thanks for pointing it out. I agree on the reboot thing - the RT summary kind of notes that the similarity to the 2002 film is a point of contention for critics, and it's already noted. Perhaps if after the summary the section was split into a paragraph or so for positive, and then the same for negative. +" Yeah, right! The fellow English user calling him ""Ruhrfisch"" is also a genuine sock-puppet of the German Admin who has stolen the name of the famous comic-artist ""Jamiri"". It's painful, but there's a whole lot of traitors inside the system (once you have spotted them)37.230.15.218 " +You just proved my point. You have nothing to say, so you make persoanl attacks again, which are again mis-directed given that I am not even Serbian. ) Unlike this alleged Dardanian-Albanian link, there is a plethora of evidence that Kosovo was part of the Serbian kingdom. Provide one scholar that denies this (even Albanian) ? +BS to that, you wrote the original one, . And you just switched usernames to write this one. Pathetic. 138.251.242.2 +I did promise so on Meta-Wiki at your accountpage, and herewith like to thank you for the answer to be unprotected, which I 'm trying to achieve. Regards: Borgdorff 86.83.155.44 +Don't see any attack, unlike the one YOU made on my page, why don't you come up with the evidence before you accuse people!?!???!?!83.67.56.138 +It's just a rumor, pay no attention. +Rick in the crazy guy that started dating Terri in season 3 and would go on to beat her up. Terri didn't like this, but she is fat, so it's not like she has her pick of guys. Eventually, Rick pushes her and her head falls on a rock, knocking her into a coma. When Rick returns to Degrassi, everyone starts picking on him. Spinner, Jimmy and the Candy Bandits pick on him the worst. Spinner and the CB rig on bucket of tar and feathers to fall on him when he is on stage, ala the movie Carrie. Rick snaps, brings a gun to school and shoots Jimmy. Soon after, Rick dies in a fight with Sean. 19:34, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" The Living Christ: The Testimony of the Apostles Hey there. Just to let you know, I've restored last year's edit to this article, this time with a 2008 LDS reference mentioning ""Firstborn"" in the context we discussed, as that seemed your issue with it. Cheers! " +http://variancemagazine.com/news/4297-sia-has-already-written-recorded-new-album-this-is-acting (info already incorporated into article) +Both you and your Cock Sucker, USER:WAR, are pathetic. +" I assume that the intended meaning of the sentence was that Morava brought ideas from arithmetic geometry into algebraic geometry. But is this actually true? It needs a reference if so. " +Michael Leighton Hi. Thanks for updating his GP and W-L stats to include his play for Philadelphia this season. The SV% and GAA that are listed still only reflect his games for Carolina. Do you have an updated total for those? Thanks. +BAN CINEMA, he never listen to reason!!! +"::yes, good suggestion. — • Talk • " +no piggybacking create your own topic +"— Preceding signed comment added by (talk • contribs) " +have your asshole thoroughly plunged +I didn't ask for it to be deleted - get your facts right! +" Nope. Terry Koeckritz blocked half the planet on wikimedia, one A Schlafly esq blocked have the planet on the server aka ""403 blocks"". It was Schlafly who deliberately and intentionally blocked millions of IP addresses from even viewing his site. " +, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks Milowent, have replied over at the AfD. (I'm unable at this stage to rebut your argument, grats!). - 02:10 +" Actually, I have already been thinking of searching again through the list of orphaned articles (searching on each page for the character string ""language""), then compiling a list of orphaned language articles and posting that list on your discussion page. " +Name I think the Chinese 'Xi Zang' could be beeter translated as 'The Hidden West'. +krystyna skarbek i have recently completed writing the manuscript for what I hope will be the definitive biography of Krystyna. She was definitely not a double-agent. Her accuser was a Polish officer of the Szosty Oddzial (Sixth Bureau) who could not stand to have someone as charismatic as Krystyna on his patch (Cairo). None of the rumours he spread about her were ever confirmed and she was eventually re-instated as an SOE operative. By the way, Krystyna was NOT born in 1915, but earlier, and not in Mlodzieszyn. Her birth and baptismal certificates have been located in Poland. When I find a publisher for my manuscript I will correct what has been written about her in Wikipedia (which I fully support). Ron Nowicki +Please stop editing Eva Longoria Parker. Please stop editing Eva Longoria Parker. +" Your inane gibberish is not helping, mind you. There is no limit on what pertinent information could be included. Either include or don't include (by explaining why). But, making a template collapsed by default is gratuitous and unacceptable. here " +" Speedy deletion of 张金柱 A tag has been placed on 张金柱 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. " +Jared Diamond has pointed out that only one crop name is reconstructible proto-Indo-European, a word for a non-specific type of grain, while many specific crop names can be reconstructed for proto-Bantu or proto-Austronesian... +" A barnstar for you! The Special Barnstar The Special Barnstar is awarded to a user as a gesture of appreciation when there is no other barnstar which would be appropriate.A Leftist; a devoted Wikipedian; a sense of humour; knowledge and intelligence without arrogance…Well, you are simply an all-round good egg. " +"The Green Fairway Estates is an Alexander Construction Company housing development in Palm Springs, California. Designed and constructed in the mid-century modern style of the period, the Green Fairway Estates tract is perched on the edge of Tahquitz Golf Course in the southern part of the city. The fairway homes begin near the corner of Lakeside Drive and Brentwood and snake their way down the street continuing on to a portion of Pebble Beach. Each home was built according one of nine master floor plans, each theme being repeated only two or three times due to the limited number of homes that were constructed prior to 1965 the year that the Alexanders died in a plane crash. Fortunately for the development, however, a number of Green Fairway Estates were completed prior to or soon after this terrible accident. The Green Fairway Estates are in many ways the ""Brigadoon"" Alexanders of Palm Springs, as very few people even die-hard modernists know about the neighborhood. Many of the Green Fairway homes are executed in an Asiatic or South Pacific style, influenced no doubt by the sense of Eastern exoticism being brought home by World War II soldiers. Construction features include A-frame roofs, lava rock facades, Aztec motifs, and other ""exotic"" features. With floorplan names like The Royal Singapore and The Maracaibo, the whimsical ideals and themes of the period are in full force. The architect responsible for these models was architect Donald Wexler architect of the Palm Springs International Airport and the now famous North End steel homes. The area surrounding the tract was originally surveyed and developed by the Westview Development Company in 1958. Westview Development Corporation was operated by Chicago residential and commercial developer Morton Zuckerman (president) and vice-president Frank Bogert, mayor of Palm Springs. In charge of sales was realtor and developer George Gannon. The designer of the golf course was Lawrence Huges." +thank you for you help with this matter +" Geonotice Hey there. Can you please change the Geonotice from the Boston and Cambridge item to the Cambridge only item, as we discussed last week? The Boston event was yesterday. Thanks! Wha? " +ASENDOH, YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE +" Google Name Origin ""Goo - ogle"". Stare at the unusable ""pile of shit"". That's what global information pool is without searching tool. It's a word play on number ""googol"" and ""ogle the goo"" - see through the humungous amounts of data. That's what I think it is. I am quite surprised that the Wikipedia article is not including this hypothesis, when founders are silent about it. Note: ""ianmcm"" and ""bongwarrior"" (read ""dopehead""/druguser's profile) are censoring this discussion. I will have them evicted from Wikipedia community. Please everybody: go after them! " +Kenneth Howard Is this sentence accurate? =//= +, 1 July 2012 (UTC) resequenced text to align Transhumanism with the philosophy reference as well as linking it to the Transhumanism wiki page. 74.111.4.108 22:57 +Do not delete I'm getting sick and tired of Wikipedia deleting everything. Do not delete this article. It is useful information and one of the best things about Wikipedia is lists like this. Sod the copyright violations - if Forbes or whoever have a problem then let them sue Wikipedia. It's time that big companies like them had their arses kicked in the courts. Millions of people use Wikipedia and information deserves to be free. +Religulous (mormon) source I have added a source for you, from the Salt Lake Tribune (they tend to have a pretty good grasp on Mormons in popular culture). Hopefully this satisfies you. +You are warned that your vandalism of the [Don Murphy]page must cease. ColScott Don Murphy Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are warned that your vandalism of the [Don Murphy]page must cease. ColScott ColScottColScott Sorry Monkey the page got locked while we figure out who you are and report you to your employer. YOU got pwned! User:DONNY PWNED YOU +why you're being a complete jerk +Your protege Prin aka Man's Plans vandalised my user pages a dozen times. Thank You! +Jess, I've had a Wikipedia account for about 5 years. Why are you bothering me? +I wasn't saying that, I was just saying that he [Welbeck] is of Ghanaian descent / heritage. +"My problem is that if a few people in America or the UK don't speak and fully understand japanese, that is not sufficient to determine ""common misconception."" NO ONE in japan misunderstands the distinction between the two. And what does sushi mean anyways? ""Usually raw, but sometimes cooked, fish on top of rice."" That the ill-informed generally think of raw fish when thinking of suchi is largely correct. " +Lost Characters Category? Gary Troup hasn't been mentioned in the show or the show's canon, IIRC. I've already removed Rachel Blake from the Lost Characters category, but before I did I mentioned it on the talkpage of the Lost Wikiproject. If someone can provide me with some reason why Gary Troup remains in this category, other than purportedly being on the plane, then I won't remove him. I shall propose the same idea I did in the talk page of Rachel Blake, make a Lost Experience Characters category. I just don't feel like a fictional author who made a book that only mentions the Hanso Foundation in a few chapters belongs in a category made exclusively for characters on the show. +Not the same person dude- this is a lab comp. +" DAMN FKER ITS ME 24...173. ONCE AGAIN, MY IP ADDRESS CHANGES AFTER AN ADMISTOR BANNS IT!!!!!!!! GET IT YET YOU ""FEMALE DOG"" " +"Gum!? Who would call it ""Gum?""" +" I have been blocked by some dodgy Irish bitch called ... WTF does she know about educational institutions in Melbourne? ... You're on the other side of the world! I should introduce you to my mate Brendan Fevola. He loves Irish sluts.. and barmen. Wiki the fuck off! " +Nightwish does not belong on the list. They are Power Metal not Gothic Metal. There first CD was Power metal there 2nd two CD's were Power Metal. Many sites have listed them as Power Metal. They are not Gothic Metal.98.224.211.86 +Evening RuthAS: about to upload the Menestrel page, with most of the typos removed. Thanks for reading it. I couldn't find the image on Commons, so perhaps you would do the honours? Cheers, +}} {{reqphoto|people of the United States +{{unblock|You fucking moron. You blocked me for reverting unwanted edits to my own talk page. What an asshole!}} +March 2012 (UTC) right on. Great idea to use the Amazon feature! Glad you wrestled this one to the ground. And you're right. My refs are accurate. Going to making a few other edits in the next few days. Found one problem in particular with another editor's assertion.Later, 17:17, 27 +And also if you can write about comments in the gang rape case, you can also write about the ashrams and bal sanskar kendras. +{{subst:arbcom notice|Military Occupation of Gaza}}. +Giralang I've just stumbled on this page today, and this bit stuck out: By 4pm houses were alight in the suburbs of Duffy and Giralang, with the loss of a home in Holder soon after… The fires in Giralang were related to the weather — too hot and windy; environmental factors — untrimmed trees too close to powerlines; and other factors such as faulty/poorly maintained powerlines. It was simply a coincidence that it was on the same day. As for verification, it was my partner's parents' house and their neighbour's that went up and we were inside at the time. Should I/we/someone just remove 'Giralang' from that paragraph and the rest of the article? While I believe that we should be mentioned, currently it isn't correct. What are your ideas on how to fix it? Thanks! P.S. please be patient with me, I'm a wiki n00b! +Template I can confirm that I didn't start that page. The template is at +Nativity scene Thank you dor reviewing th article! I followed you recommendations and await your approval. Thank you again! +" I could not understand exactly what you mean. can you please clarify it more? Talk + " +I guess it is useless to discuss after all; you have decided the answer from the beginning 124.13.148.207 +Also, please note that the same user is doing the same kind of thing at Sansho the Bailiff. +Jesus can suck my balls. +That's fine. It's not like anyone would have noticed you were gone, because you don't edit anything else besides the Westerfield article. Which only reinforces my belief that you have an agenda to push around here. You aren't anything I can't handle. Just know that I'll continue to revert your salacious babble about Damon being in a bedroom with a woman. As well as the price of the Van Dam's new home. As if any of that has any relevance to the crime. Victim bashing a great tactic used by the child-killers attorney to defend the pervert. You think you know so much because you're on the side as the pervert??? What kind of man has rape videos on his computer? Does it feel good to be on the same side of a man like that? Yeah, yeah, sure, it was really Neal who was into that stuff. Either way someone in that home was a pervert, and even if it was only Neal who looked at the child porn and rape videos he had to learn it from someone. My guess would be by daddy-dearest. +reworded template Currently the template states: Can this be changed to: +Okay. Thanks, Phillsox +"::::The wikipedia verifibility policy does not require a claim to be proven false, the onus is on the person inserting the claim (in this case being ""of Irish descent"") to prove that it is the case. I have made no claim about her nationality/passport or whatever, the only thing in the article that is close is a description of her being a ""British politician, and considering that she is an MP in the British political system, that seems to be quite factual to me. Regards, " +I thought about the article structure as I reviewed it. I moved a few sentences around to improve the flow (I hope). I think the structure is probably fine the way it is, unless you want to break the history section into subsections. —  Talk/Stalk +I swear. I will never make anymore death threats. Just please unblock me. I will never make anymore sockpuppets or violate any other rules on Wikipedia. Please. Please. I worked to hard in Wikipedia to be blocked. This is my first ever wikipedia reign. I always tried to edit wikipedia, I never felt the jest. This time I do. And I'm really sorry for violating the rules. Please, Unblock me. +Pairing down There's some good material here, but it needed tightening. The lead was somewhat verbose and carried POV, and the FCB had a considerable amount of colloquial speak, some of which was appropriate in a PH (also where the commentary about the art belongs. The trick here is to write for the layman who knows nothing about the characters. +Also - I have protected the article for the time being so nobody can edit it, except Wikipedia administrators. If the copyright violation is confirmed then that material will be removed until discussion is resolved. +Your recent claims Dear delanoy. I am really surprised to hear that I could be editing from someone else's account. This is simply impossible technically. I am the only account for my edits. Some editors may develop close online camaraderie on certain pages of their mutual interest but that is where the issue stops. Your use of wikistalk is controversial. I added my name next to names of users who opposed my edits and wikistalk found very close similarity. +. I prefer the article the size it is (ie. succinct), but would oppose merger if the justification for merger is that it reduces revert wars (since under that theory merger then represents appeasement to vandals). +In addition to above: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +Wait, if it just took a minute to upload it, why is it still red? (I'm not experienced in image uploading). +Any Canadian would agree, Celine Dion is horse faced. 99.235.43.93 +and batiushka loved russian Orthodox church +" Pope John Paul II Peer review Hi DrKiernan, the Pope John Paul II article is currently on peer review, if you are interested in participating .69 talk " +This has to be one of the most unprofessional companies I've ever seen. Their commercials make the company look like a huge joke. Who would buy insurance from these people? +" fringe Alun wrote: ""far too much and far too pov"" if POV means not NPOV, i challenge you to identify text which isn't presented neutrally (i.e. not favoring a side but neutrally stating other people's opinions). then lets improve that text. ""fringe theories shoud not have so much space"" per NPOV: All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias. a view that is mentioned in almost every discussion of the topic should be described fairly and in proportion to the attention it receives. ""the addition was entirely promoting a singe point of view"" a view that was not previously missing from the article ""provide arguments against as well, or it's pov-pushing"" the ""4.3 Environmental impacts"" section does just that, but if there are specific points that should be added or changed, i encourage further targeted development. demanding perfection in every edit seems inappropriate. " +The court cases themselves are primary sources. They can be included in the references section, but they should not be used to directly reference the controversy in the lead section of this article. I would like to remove the court cases, and move them to the references. The controversy itself can be referenced to a couple of sources; it really does not need 9 or 11 references. There is either controversy or not. How about editors pick 2? +" Wiki policy says primary sources are acceptable as ""descriptive"", which is exactly what the sentence is. If you say ""we don't use primary sources"" you are setting your own standard, not Wiki's. If you tag the sentence you are challenging the primary source, which doesn't make sense as the link is provided. " +Proposed deletion of Fundraising card Hello, Ganglandboss, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Fundraising card, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted: edit the page remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} save the page It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! — +I dare you to delete this for the eighth time... Protect yourself! I have made several contributions to wikipedia in the last few minutes and it is sad that on such an open source project I am being attacked and not allowed to post any new information on several pages. I think the deletion of my entries is baseless and as you can see here, my writing is neither incoherent nor pejorative. Please describe to me immediately the reasons you have taken such actions or I will have no choice but to report you to the Wikipedia authourities. +":*My mistake, I removed the ""which"" from the sentence which seemed to confuse everybody. Though the plot is a little more complex, I think this single sentence summarises the basics of the story/gameplay though I can expand if you like? ☯ uar ☯ " +I still think the collage is silly, especially the magazine cover, but I can live with the improved caption. (ᛏ) +This article does not properly or adequately describe the processes of unification and integration +" Wikipedia and copyright Hello Glenn Coggeshell, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Veronica Vitale has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. " +"==Regarding edits made during March 27 2008== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - talk " +Can't find the video tape/logo, sorry. +Jag Bhaduria Hey pm_shef, Here's the real story http://www.eye.net/eye/issue/issue_02.10.94/NEWS/nv0210b.htm about how Mario Racco lost the nomination federally in 1993 to Jag Bhaduria and the real reason why Bhaduria was kicked out of the Liberal Party. +" Seldom have I read such a badly written newspaper article, full of metaphors that make absolutely no sense whatsoever! ""Stimme"" means voice (as well as vote), and a ""Gipfeltour"", as far as I know, is simply a tour of mountain peaks, of which I'm sure Switzerland has many... " +This is Jimbo Wales's web site, it is not a forum for free speech. See. wp:free speech. Vandalism is not 'humor'. +" Hi Lionelt. While I appreciate a good faith warning, before issuing one, I would generally advise actually reviewing the situation. The edits in question didn't reintroduce any disputed content, and discussion on the talk page was ongoing. Each of my edits left out any and all content Anupam contested, which I made very clear. I'll also note that you didn't warn Anupam, who actually did break 3rr by reverting the same content 4 times without explanation. Not sure what your reason was for warning me and not him, but I don't see it as much of a productive conversation either way. All the best,   — · Δ♥ " +with a splinter group +agrippa pentagram man Hello Mr. Nixdorf. I have seen your scan of the pentagram man on wikipedia. I am writing a book and would like a bigger image (300 dpi at say, 5 by 5 inches. I wonder if you have such a scan, and if you would give it to me or charge a fee and how much. The reason I am interested in the pentagram man is because I am writing about dynamic symmetry and how the pentagram and human body manifest dynamic symmetry. I compare the pentagram man to the Resurrection of Christ by Piero della Francesca. The book will be published by Seapoint Books (Smith Kerr Associates) in May. Please tell me if you can help me with a higher resolution scan. Thank you Jane McCloskey janemccloskey1@myfairpoint.net Deer Isle, Maine USA +Well, it wasn't an unfriendly comment. I also don't have strong feelings about whether we have an article. My initial motivation for involvement was the same as yours after I saw James' idiotic claims of fear for her personal safety on the administrator's board. It went downhill from there. Notice that as soon as you did it, one of them started changing it right back. +" Please explain what do you mean by ""reviews of his books to establish notability, as they aren't independent of the subject. For the article to be accepted and notability to be verifiable, you need non-trivial and independent sources"" why books' reviews are considered dependent? Can you give an example what is considered to be independent or non-trivial. Looking on many other biographies of professors in Wikipedia - I find many other with even less resources." +Sjö is pathetical. Consist (presently at 83.254.20.53 = +"{|width=""170"" align=""left"" cellspacing=""4"" cellpadding=""4"" style=""border: 2px solid #000000; font-size: 100%; padding: 4px; margin: 0 1em; margin-right:0; background-color: #FBA0E3;clear:right;"" |- |align=""left""|Words are loaded pistols. — Jean-Paul Sartre |} An intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself. — Albert Camus Sarcasm: the last refuge of modest and chaste-souled people when the privacy of their soul is coarsely and intrusively invaded. — Fyodor Dostoyevsky " +" The article's current treatment of the cult issue is unsatisfactory. It quotes journalist Ian Johnson at length for his ""common sense"" argument that Falun Gong is not a cult (""its members marry outside the group, have outside friends, hold normal jobs...""). However, it fails to quote any professional cult scholars, like Singer, except to deride their work as ""legitimizing"" the crackdown. The respect towards the anticult movement within academia—an unclear issue, but continuously repeating that they are an ""extreme fringe"" does not automatically make it true—is not necessary to have their opinions in the article. The issue of whether Falun Gong is a cult is important to cover from the point of view of studying the media battle between Falun Gong and the outside world. The fact that apologist authors like Ownby are forced to grapple with the cult issue - even if his comments, like Johnson's, are based on personal impressions and not an objective psychological checklist like Singer's - means that the question is notable. BTW, the academic field of religious studies is well-known for its postmodernist defenses of what popular opinion nearly unanimously derides as dangerous cults, like Scientology. Wouldn't it be interesting if someone commented on this tendency as it relates to Falun Gong... " +Now who's all up in arms about cultural minutiae. Face it bud, you didn't do you homework. Nor did you discuss on the talk page before you slapped a tag on it. I'm sure you can find some sort of wikijustification for your poor research. Just keep to stuff you know from here on out. Otherwise you'll get your ass handed to you over and over again. 71.102.2.128 +" CONCACAF Sorry, but can you redo your update to the article. I got ECed after changing the table's format and I can't quite sort out what your update was. .Alpaugh " +Sorry about the version conflict from my side! Good examples are (for subjects area): Lists_of_philosophers or Deaths_in_2007 Also very good example (not being a subject) is List_of_mathematics_articles_(0-9). If you would say everything and anything could be a stand-alond list, what would the different from a normal list? I think the guideline are not well defined. +", 19 November 2009 (UTC) BTW, if you want to know what it was like to be Hung, drawn and quartered, watch HBO's take on it (not for the squeamish) of Doom 21:09" +Please save me god This is my final wish for my sister. Some people are cold blood and Virulent for the first time tongue. May 26, 2010, 11:43 (UTC) +Please stop vandalising articles or you will be blocked. +" I sometimes can't understand Avi a thing. But this LOL ahahahahahahah ! ) He had one when heard about the new Madonna album!? Quite awkward — • Question Existing? " +I strongly disagree whith your opinion, but since I'm clearly outnumbered I'll accept your decision; in my opinion, the most information it's removed, the least useful this article becomes: the only “opening year” isn't really relevant, if it's taken individually - and despite being stable data, they're alike questionable (at least for early systems) - and this way even the sortability of the table becomes pointless: it'll be more rational to revert the article to a mere, simple list as it was before March 2013 (if I correctly saw in the “history”). Conversely, the reader's usefulness of collecting statistic data in such a global list is far bigger than adding that to a nationwide/continental list: if you're interested in some specific system you can go directly to their individial Wiki pages, while if you aim to a world overview, it's somewhat tiring to “search, open & match” a handful of different article. Don't take it to heart, but I don't intend to further contribute to this list: good luck with your project, but from my personal point of view as reader/user it doesn't worth the needed time and effort. +I've never put fake quotes of praise into the article. I've only given Savage's retorts. Secondly, I did state on the discussion page that I was taking some of those quotes off. Thirdly, can you explain to me what your personal problem with Savage is? He bashes Bush as much as the liberals do. You should like Savage. +" Studio albums YearAlbumPeak chart positionsSalesCertifications(sales thresholds)U.S.U.S. R&BUKAUSNZDENGERSWIFRANLSWE2012Sinful; Lust First studio album Released: Janurary 1, 2012 Label: Arista5121177631550413 US: 3,541,000 NL: 320,000http://aaliyahremembered2.homestead.com/files/Japan.pdf UK: 660,000 World: 5,541,000 US: 4× Platinum CAN: Gold UK: Platium ""—"" denotes releases that did not chart" +De La Salle College (Toronto) +Yes. I know about the two options of 'l'/'L' symbols. Incidentally, I was interested in your suggestion that wing loading should be in force units. I had never thought of it like that and it makes some sense. I see that you have reverted some of your changes but it was interesting to question it. In any case, I think that it is redundant for aircraft articles to state a measure that is merely the ratio of two other measures already stated. Most readers don't care, and those that do care can calculate the ratio from the information provided. Wing loading and power to weight ratio are examples in that category. My main concern was to see SI units rather than 'kgf'. Thanks for the feedback.   (talk) 15:03, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) +Frustrated Father Eight years ago my wife got a federal felony charge for meth.. She has served 18 months and we have turned our lives around since. We have two boys 15,13 that are going elk hunting this year with me so I purchased a rifle. The only problem is that I have to keep it at my fathers house 40 miles away. Can anyone point me in the right direction for the correct interpretation for what being in possession is. It seems to me that the boys and I should be to keep our guns here at the house so long as my wife doesn't leave here with them. +Sockpuppet I would like you to tell everyone I'm not a sockpuppet of you, just to make sure everyone is clear. +i tried to add a huge article to the sandbox but it never ends up loading +You always revert my edits without discussions. I suggest you stop removing sourced information as this is very helpful. What you do is an act of vandalism. I don't get any satisfaction over many people being killed in the past, but this is history and must be explained. I believe it is perfectly fine to leave a short message for every edit. It becomes part of the record. If you want to discuss something on Talk, I don't mind discussing. +" Not that I think it's a big deal either way, but the definition of a successor state is one that upholds all treaties and laws of its predecessor (unless the relevant legal authority declares the last regime or a specific law void). So unless that's been done, whatever the Soviet Union's treaties with SADR were, they are currently treaties of Russia. Nightw " +hey hey hey runescape players +":Hi. Lots of points, I'll reply as best I can: Listing the squadrons and their aircraft types is too much /for this article/ but not too much for Wikipedia. Only listing the serial numbers, pilots or other minutiae is too much for Wikipedia. One way you could try would be to create a ""sandbox"" page for yourself, say User:FFA P-16/Sandbox, write up the squadrons as best you can and then ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft‎ if we can look at it, tidy up the English, etc. and advise on the best page to put it on. Ground instruction airframes are not notable unless there is some special reason, for example if the airframe itself is notable from earlier in its life. Re. the ordering of the list, I would have to think about that but it is really a separate discussion. You say that the serial numbering (tail numbering) uses a special system. I would like to see this system explained, but it needs just a few examples to show the principles, not the whole list. If Swiss writers routinely quote the serial number of an aircraft when writing about it, as a way of showing the information contained in the number, then you should be able to reference this. Such references might convince us that the Swiss Air Force is an exception to the general rule. We Wikipedia editors do like to see hard evidence, not just another editor's word. And, as you have noticed, we sadly know little of the Swiss Air Force unless someone can find reliable sources for us. — Cheers, (Talk) " +" Do you even read what people write on this talk page? OrangeMike has consistently supported you, despite your willingness to attack him. He has never engaged in personal attacks and has tried to soften everyone to your opinions on many an occasion. He is also, in fact, not Madison centered, but has repeatedly debated in favor of the non-Madison-centric crowd. On this issue, Miaers, you seem to have alienated yourself. Everyone here is trying to remain civil, yet you just go to your old ad hominem standby and call us obnoxious and ignore our questions in favor of your usual ""recall NPOV"" comments. Lets have a cup of tea and remember why we're here, Miaers. Cheers, " +Will, as you can see from the talk page and history, I have attempted multiple times to get people onto the talk page, and work out their complaints. It does not seem fair or prudent that you have protected the page after one of their edits, and not one of those of us who are trying to get them onto the talk page. +This should be merged with Circumcision This should be merged with Circumcision to reduce the current pro-circ pov of that article that has been created the the huge ammount of text dedicated to supposed benefits of circumcision, why the detriments have been largely neglected and down played in that article. +There is no proof, no facts, and no verifiable resources. Therefor there is no reason to include that part of the article. I will continue to remove it and if I get blocked from editing I will inform a higher-up Admin of the situation and explain to him that there is no proof, no facts, and no verifiable resources so there is no need to include that in the article. Wikipedia is just a place where immature kids like to vandilize everything. That's why in schools the teachers don't allow kids to use Wikipedia because most of the stuff is false. That's the problem with Wikipedia, a lot of peopel are corrupted. My job on Wikipedia is to clean as much stuff as I can up and make it true, factual, and verifiable. So if you get an Admin to block me, I will consult another Admin as I have just explained. I want to make Wikipedia better so that people get more educated and don't get F's on reports because the information wasn't true. +" Drop me an email and I'll send you the scan. - " +" Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, not a place for you to amuse yourself and your friends with insulting mock articles.  An on the ''run!'' " +GFY. Man U supporters are losers +yes they are to me.I am rockin rebel....what business are they of yours? this is my page who are you to say anything? +GabeMc socking? I put a sock tag on Rationalobserver's user page (which they keep removing) because I just have a hunch it's GabeMc back to torture us as a sock. The reverts, the topics edited, the argumentativeness, etc. What do you think? +Who is the woman vocalist at the Ennio Morricone - The Ecstasy of Gold (live in concert)? What a voice! Madinia Kolla +http://www.certeon.com Certeon's WAN Optimization Virtual Appliances +" Well, I am not calling it ""essay"", because at first sight the text seemed quite encyclopedic to me, and the word ""rant"" refers to form, not content. mikka (t) Agree with Mikka. I see that someone is making an attempt to salvage portions of the essay. I don't think that that's necessary, since just about all the points brought up in it are already better covered in more specialized articles, particularly collectivisation in the USSR. As I said above, I pared down the essay/rant in the ""Rise to Power"" section (Mikka removed the same editor's ""essay"" about Collectivization, quite rightly, as it's well covered in the relevant article). I also said that it's debatable if it needs to be there at all, even in the ""pared-down"" version. I'm reluctant to remove someone's whole contribution, especially when they are a new editor, as I don't want to discourage new editors; but if the consensus feeling is that it should all go, then so be it. Incidentally, regarding ""form"", when I looked at the mark-up behind the ""essay"" it showed that the editor had separated it into paragraphs by indenting the separate paras, rather than leaving blank-lines, so it was just a case of a new-editor not being familiar with the correct way to format paragraphs, and ending up with one long para, hence looking like a ""rant"". Also, new editors tend not to be familiar with the idea of keeping to the salient points and wiki-linking to in-depth articles. talk|contribs " +I thought since Tuva was in Russia, they spoke only Russian.|talk|contribs|email +SagaiousPHil who is a pillockbrain not the elast sagacious has the tiny mind of the low intellect that hates being corrected by his superiors. +I'm sorry Tito da. But I still don't quite understand why you suggested this page: WP:PEER. +" What are you doing? Can you actually read? "". Bwilkins (talk | contribs) changed block settings for Altetendekrabbe (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:32:27 GMT (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) ‎(Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: WP:NPA while blocked)"" Did you just block the user for merely making an unblock request?????? Are you open to recall or do I take this to AN/I or ArbCom? " +sense DADT dont make sense to me in some areas help me out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +You're right, I should have specified multi-decadal time frame (which is most relevant). Your summary is accurate, although too vauge IMO. Remember too, these are the same 'observations' that the literature claim are largely reconciled. (Does this uncertainty not shake your confidence?) +" WHO IS ATTACKING WHO? WHATEVER, THE FACT THAT YOU CANT LEAVE WELL ENOUGH ALONE PROVES MY POINT. YOU ARE A PATHETIC LITTLE SWINE WITH A SMALL DICK AND NO BACKBONE. SO MUCH SO THAT YOU GOTTA POST SHIT IN DISCUSSION THREADS IN RESPONSE TO A ""CITE NEEDED"" EDIT..(WTF??). BUT I DIGRESS, MY POINT REMAINS THAT BY YOU CONTINUING THIS CONVERSATION MY POINT IS PROVEN. IM DONE, SO GO FUCK YOURSELF." +" Binksternet and his cronies are clearly edit warring as they continuously insert information on this Gustave Whitehead page that denigrates Whitehead and researchers. I am editing the page to remove the negativity and restore it to professional appearance, with citations. These ""mother hens"" for this page are clearly Wright Brothers enthusiasts who have had a long history of controlling this page and placing misleading or non-neutral info on it. Improving the page is what I am doing. If they dislike what I put on it, they can open up a talk page comment and provide citations to prove what I added isn't correct. As you see on television and in the media, the CT state legislature is convinced Whitehead is first in flight, to add to what Jane's, the bible of aviation, has determined. There is much more that will come out on this so get ready to be open-minded. The cult of the Wrights is over. Now is the time for facts. Binksternet has reported anothor person, a tv producer who specializes in historical documentaries, for edit warring. This just shows how completely immature he is and the cronies are that support this, as well as how unreliable Wikipedia information is. This is an example of ""mobbing"", or being bullied by a mob, in this case, of biased, bitter people who have a near religious connection to the Wrights LEGEND. " +Blah You fat dykey cunt! If you would fucking read for once in your life, you would see that I did have a reason for getting unbanned. My ban was being continued unfairly, but you don't listen and just sit on your fat ass and hit the block indefinately button. Not fair, cuntbag. I hope you get hit by a car. Kisses! +" References in popular culture I'm moving these here, because it seems to me that they are not important in the works in which they occurjust passing references. This is underlined by the fact that they are not referenced. And they do not illustrate anything important about any cultural role of egg sandwiches. (talk) In the Red Dwarf episode ""Thanks for the Memory"", Arnold Rimmer is given a party celebrating his death day. Once back on the ship, Dave Lister wishes he could have a '...triple fried egg butty with chili sauce and chutney.' Soon after, Rimmer in his drunken state wishes for the same thing. Holly produces one for Rimmer and after taking a bite he exclaims 'I feel like I'm having a baby!' The scene continues on for several minutes. In the Biz Markiesong ""Dinner Date,"" Markie expresses his desire to eat an egg sandwich off of a woman's rear end." +"Search digikey.com for ""supercapacitor"". There you will find a number of capacitors listed in the 1200 F to 5000 F range. At this moment they offer 1700 F @ 2.7 V for $160, 3500 F @ 2.7 V for $210, and 5000 F @ 2.7 V for $255. These are made by NessCap Co Ltd. So they do appear to be available, though I would not say that this is an indication that they are widely available. " +Hmm; symmetrical, how so? I'm a bit tired at the moment, so I might have misfired (which I thought the second I hit save TBH). I aimed for the middle but, to be honest, it's probably easier just to get consensus on your proposal. Errant (chat!) +==Help Contribute to Article: TV Episodes Considered the Greatest of All Time Hey man, what's up? I'm new to Wikipedia and I just started this article for contenders for the greatest TV episode of all time. Listen, it was first up for deletion and it could be deleted if there is a huge lack of content. I put more stuff on there man, but I think it would be great if you could help contribute to the article. I really want this one to survive; it could be an important one. So, post something on the article's talk page about contributing to the article; thanks!!! Oh babe +Operation Barbarossa Hi, This is just an invitation to get together at the Operation Barbarossa discussion page and see if the article can't be improved to the FA level. I am going to try and firstly restructure and later rewrite the article in my sandbox (firstly at home on my PC), but I have already discussed some ideas with one other contributor and would appreciate more input from members of the task force. +" G.O.B. Your additions were superfluous. It is obvious by reading the lead that these are ""fictional"" characters. ""[P]layed by..."" makes it clear. Therefore, the additions were redundant. Subsequently, I removed them. 06:08, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)" +"Do those who want to include conspiracy evidence also believe the earth is flat?== The editor who fears that the inclusion of facts about Oswald's claim of being made a patsy by the use of fabricated evidence and then being silenced by murder, has received support from another editor by the name of Mr. Harris. (See, above) Mr. Harris argues the beliefs there was a plot to kill the president, and that Oswald was set up, is similar to believing the earth is flat. No Mr. Harris, you are out of step with the modern world. In 1979, a Congressional Committee engaged in a three year study and determined that Kennedy was probably murdered as a result of a conspiracy, and in 2003 only 22% of Americans agree with you. Mr. Harris, you are clinging to the past in the face of overwhelming information to the contrary that is slowly being made public as more and more documents are declassified. Sometimes one has to question old beliefsnot try to delete facts from books that disprove ones old beliefs. Congress enacted federal legislation in 1992 to open up the mass of secret government records about the assassination. The Assassination Records Review Board points out that not many people agree with Mr. Harris: ""The American public has expressed its dissatisfaction with both the work and the conclusions of the official investigations of the assassination and it was this dissatisfaction that was primarily responsible for Congress' initiative to establish the Assassination Records Review Board (Review Board). Section 3(2) of the JFK Act defines the records of each of these official investigative entities as assassination records. As such, the Review Board worked to review and release all records that these investigative entities used in reaching their conclusions about the assassination."" Mr. Harris it won't help you cause to argue that everyone but you is dumb, a ""flat-earth believer"", or must be sheltered from the facts. Please, just stop deleting facts from the articles. The old viewpoint that you want to believe is in the article. But, you’re not satisfied. You want to keep out the evidence that makes your position to look improbable, but the web site rules forbid you deleting such information. ==" +2006 (UTC) Seems like it's working now, right? Setting up a redirect is documented somewhere in the Wikipedia docs. 22:15, 4 May +Request for mediation Will you agree to mediation on the article Sniper rifle? +I ceated it as a category for all new Viacom like the new Paramount Television and Viacom Media Networks +As I said, I am not insulting to you, just typing the facts. See ya. +you're a douche... it is not a slang guide it is an article containing slang +", while other Nazis ""could not believe what they had done""," +you bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you shut me down!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hate you sooooo much! >>>>>>:::::(((((( *** >:( ^^extremely mad face ^^ANGRY FACE. Go and shove a football helmet up your ass you meanie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +OCD, notable cases As you may know there are numerous cases where notable cases of a disease is given, such in the featured article of Alzheimer. I can see no reason why this is not appropriate for OCD. +"Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. e (Talk) " +, 17 February 2009 (UTC) That usage is specific to the Great Highland Bagpipe, as people don't ever play Amazing Grace for funerals on the Northumbrian smallpipe or the gaita. That is a legitimate point though, I'd bring it up over on the GHB Discussion page. We're really trying to keep this page pipe-neutral rather than let one type of pipes be covered more than others. 23:58 +The two interwiki links are considered as links by AWB's logic. No idea why. +" Years in television Would you please move back the regional ""1976 in television"" articles? The reason they were subpages was because it was a test proposition. They are not ready to go live in the main space yet (see Talk:1976 in television/Temp). I will add a notice to that effect tomorrow (and will move them back myself if you do not see this message before tomorrow). I am sorry I did not think to put the notice in right away.— 04:58, May 30, 2005 (UTC)" +Simple usage instructions See the short usage instruction section on these pages: Template:Cleanup-link rot Template:Cleanup-link rot/doc +The British army employs 113 thousand regular soldiers. It also employs a further 167 thousand soldiers, who have been trained to a professional standard. These men are soldiers too, and should be counted. +I have read all his books and have some with me. There is one thing for certain, he was not a Wahhabi because he never advocated suicide bombing on fellow muslims just for showing love to their prophet and his house. When Wahhabi uses the word Sufi, they mean someone who worships the grave and then claim that none of the Sufi saint was really a sufi. What a stupid claim. +Michael Moore films as propaganda. Hi- A couple of weeks ago, I added the Category: American propaganda films tag to a couple of Michael Moore films, and you reverted my edit. Now, I'll certainly grant that whether his films are propaganda depends on your definition of propaganda, but my concern is that the category is not being used in a consistent fashion, and these inconsistencies can give the appearance of bias. As such, I think clearer criteria for inclusion in the category would help eliminate these inconsistencies, so I've put up a proposal at Category talk:Propaganda films. As someone who's been involved in this issue, I thought you might want to weigh in. +Wait, you want to know who I am, but couldn't care less... who I am. American, right? +See the Google ngrams links directly below. — +By the way, in case I am right, you'd better rush to that page with bogus AFD notice. +Okay, I'm going to look a bit more into it before I reject the most literal translation though - the literal german translation is Saxon Fratricidal War and makes sense in this case, so I'd rather err towards this. It's not exactly a civil war, is it? Can we define it that way, I'm not sure? I'll keep looking into it as I think the literal translation is best, at least for right now until we search a bit more. +" As long it does not loose its GA status. Nvvchar. " +Secular vs Religious I need help Neutrality. How do you add secularism to word God, and to word martyr??? These words can not be secular. Word martyr is in many religious texts as we can see in the contents section, now just because someone decided to name some people martyr's in some event that happened in time who didn't even die or that did die doesn't make them martyrs, even though we call them. Now this word is used by secular people the word God is used by secular people when they say that God is someone else other than God. This is the same problem with this word. I need help with these trigger happy undo button pushers suggested by automated program that counts bytes??? The word martyr means witness yes, but we do not mean a witness in court here ) , we mean a witness in religious terms here, so there is no room for secularism on this page just as there is no room for athiests on religious pages, and religious people on atheists belief's pages ) +Union]], of course, would not come into existence until 1922. [[Soviet +It is listed at the Minor Planet Center as lost comet 75D/Kohoutek. +User:Blesssins Just to clear your mind, I am not user:blessins or whatever. Next time, think before you say something D +I already reported you. I will continue to report you as such untill you decide to follow the rules as stated for this article, and as defined by WP. +And the significance of this drodown menu is what? You appeal to it without saying why. I was not harassing Orderinchaos, JzG, by any standard. Please keep your false charges to yourself. +" [ WP:Edit conflict ]: Regarding sources, I stated, ""The sources don't seem to indicate simply 'prepubescent.'"" And ""that is just as much a WP:OR matter if there are no WP:Reliable sources out there supporting it. But I agree that we should have sources in that section focusing on lolicon definitions."" That is all I stated with regard to sources. And I was referring to the article. No, I am not ""taking definitions, laying them up in this article and saying okay... everything under falls under lolicon because lolicon is this and it matches what such and such says."" The lead states, in part, ""The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase ""Lolita complex""; it describes an attraction to underage girls, an individual with such an attraction."" See how it uses the word underage and is backed to four different sources), and yet you used the word prepubescent? I see prepubescent supported by the third source, but it does not state that lolicon solely focuses on prepubescents, and if the other sources state ""prepubescent,"" then why does the lead use the word underage; the word underage is not synonymous with the word prepubescent. And, okay, I 'll go ahead and alert Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga to this discussion now. " +.He has a personal stake in silencing editors here who oppose his POV +" Genesis Just a curiosity question. Anyone else lamenting the fact that ""Mega Drive"" won out over ""Genesis"" as the name of the article? - " +About this Edit summary: Becareful with what you say as an admin would get you blocked for not being civil on wikipedia, i strongly urge you to look at WP:CIVIL. If you dont care, I may go to an admin to report about you being uncivil. Wikipedia thrives on reasonable dicussions and editing and co-operation between editiors which makes wikipedians feel like they can edit wikipedia without reciving stupid threats, rudeness and name-calling. These kind of incivility which you have done in the edit summary will come across to some as an threat or what not and will leave editing wikipedia for good. If an editor is being disruptive then just revert the edit without childlish rudeness and report it in the right place. thank you and enjoy wikipedia. +Come to west bengal. I shall show you what goes on in the muslim villages. +You like making up this dont you. where does is say current. Show me the word current. Please stop sending me messages. I will disregard them from now on. Thank you for your concern, however you are wrong in this case. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Donovan McNabb. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ''(Talk)(Contribs) " +Can someone please change the Mclaren Launch location to Woking,United Kingdom its not in Newbury and make sure to put the references and plus Woking(Mclaren's HQ) is where their launching +" Apology I apologize for my rudeness on WP:AN today. .Alpaugh " +" WP:AWC Very kind of you to move WP:AWC to Sharkface's mainspace. I was wondering, since he will be on a Wikibreak until mid March can you give me the barnstars, I listed on his talk page? - Favorite Cookie I'll look into it. '''''''''' " +Vaguely. =) I think it was a good thing. Hopefully the categories will reform with a little more cogency. *Shrug*. I think you were a bit hasty but its not the end of Wikipedia. +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. " +Thank you for ur guide. It is just the user Montanabw keep's adding wrong information category to the article Karabakh horse. The horse despite its name bread in Azerbaijan and have nothing to do with armenia. Yet he keeps adding category. Moreover, he adds Nagorno-Karabakh republic by making animal topic political dispute. Could u please have a look https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karabakh_horse&diff;=620951673&oldid;=620901068 +I also want to add that the new edit, although improved from before, makes little sense. It's stated that he scripted to vacate his title that night. This implies that he already had his injury (which is true) and that WWE is aware of it (also true), hence the script in the first place. Then, the citation refers to WWE's website, which totally contradicts the above statements. Why? Because the WWE citation implies the opposite: Legacy being the cause of his injury. Might wanna fix that. +":Have to agree with Murat on this one. ""The Banality of Indifference: Zionism and the Armenian Genocide"" is certainly not a valid reference for an encylopedia article. In five minutes I can come up with a dozen ""scholarly"" propaganda articles, books and texts that state the very contrary. Please put in some valid resources and arguments. The phrasing ""Most historians"" is terrible and ""banal"". " +These are by figures released from the Heart and Stroke foundation that points to Chatham-Kent being a hot spot for coronary artery disease... +It is wrong to delete legitimate complaints held by others. To erase it is vandalism. Vandalism means you may be blocked from editing the Wikipedia. +" No, Caspian, it is you and your mode of operation that is transparent. That is the big problem with dealing with Caspian ... if anyone documents what THEY (Caspian blue) do, e.g. create noise as a distraction, they will turn around and use it in their next layer of attack attempting to draw attention away from them. The prejudicial error in using Google as an arbitrator in a situation like this is that any search for 'Yonsei' will also bring results for 'Yonsei University' etc as a partial search results. Using it properly, e.g. search for Yonsei minus the word university provides a far more accurate result for its usage. Yonsei means yonsei, Yonsei University is Yonsei University. Neither the hospital nor journals were ever called ""Yonsei"". The whole debate has been bogus and poisoned and is just part of their (Caspian blue) persistent Japanese-Korean psychosis. " +And in any case, the whole point of making personal attacks is to deter vandals like from using WP as their soapbox! 67.170.215.166 +". Some just make things up as if it substitutes for the truth, and use ""mistakes"" as ""proof"" of being ""disruptive."" But, very few actually can cite facts, inaccurate edits, nor bother to even think about checking sources cited. It is much easier to ""complain about Theodore7"" and to ""revert"" since following Wikipedia's principles about biting newcomers is an ""excuse"" since it ""does not exist"" and ""does not happen"" to any newcomer. And, if they mention it - they are ""using"" it since it doesn't exist, etc., etc. This is just one of the many problems Wikipedia newcomers face with such people. It is so much easier not to care about any subject, nor to check sources (as I do as a journalist) and to find inaccurate and unfactual materials while avoiding POV. But, to play games, to have personality conflicts as if they actually know the people they are writing to. They avoid resolving matters peacefully, but highly enjoy creating fights, building molehills into mountains, and love throwing out wild accusations. They don't ask - they assume - they immediately accuse, then complain loudly. They take everthing personally - all the while - not reading, checking sources, nor citing sources themselves on the subjects in question but adding plenty of their own POV that is not neutral, nor cited with sources. If sources run counter to their POV - then they use ruses to attempt to divert attention: and ask for RFCs on Wikipedia members who just got here, and request arbitration to resolve situations they have not even started to resolve on their own - yet claiming that they have tried. Perhaps, if some spend much more time actually checking sources, citing them, and making sure that the encylopedic materials are factual then, the ""revert wars"" by some who want to re-write history to fit their own personal views would end, and Wikipedia could be that much more successful. So, if one is to gather evidence - show just where my edits are vandalism - where? I'd like to see it. Show my edit summaries. Show my edits, and don't cite my early mistakes as ""proof"" of being ""disruptive"" since I'd like to see someone claim they do not make mistakes themselves. Oh, one more thing. When a person defends themselves - try not to dismiss it as a ""diatribe"" - but actually read it in context and take responsbility for one's own ""claims"" against the person - in this case, a new member of Wikipedia. I've had enough of my comments being taken out of context, then pasted onto RFC and arbitration sections - and used as ""proof"" of me being a bad person, and disruptive. I say different, and have the right to defend myself against what I consider to be a classic case of biting Wikipedia newcomers. I will take credit for my honest mistakes, but not for accusations that are false. My evidence are the comments, and retorts, and my edits - which, are cited, and soucred. Any arbitrator who wants to know more about my edits and comments can feel free to ask, or to view my comments IN CONTEXT and not TAKEN OOUT OF CONTEXT by some who are doing the constant ""complaining."" I see no proof of any infactual edits on my part. And, my early mistakes are just that - mistakes that most newcomers to Wikipedia make. That does not justify, say your own comments Bunchofgrapes, and those of the other ""revert warriors"" - who, in my opinion, are ruining Wikipedia. So, I've made inquiries elsewhere to make sure that perhaps this comes to an end, and that my case can be used as an example of what happens - negatively - to newcomers who run up against those who signed the RFC, and asked for arbitration. My evidence is there - my work to this time, my edits, sourcing, and using the Talk Pages - which I do not abuse, but use to add comments relevant to the subject at hand" +The content was removed because it was under a Wrong topic. It was also Original research and not referenced. Please stop maligning others +" Exactly..hello? Just as a note not to be considered a request for any particular change.. ""A century ago, American progressives said they aspired to use Hamiltonian means to achieve Jeffersonian ends. They meant they would wield a strong federal government to promote equality.""This is known as socialism. I'm a patriotic citizen, myself. I don't care much for left or right wing regimes. (The dictators, F.D.R. or George Dubya Bush) If Jefferson or Tom Paine could see the insanity that goes on their names, by both the left and right wings of this country, they would be rolling in their graves. I read Thomas Jefferson's own writings and I read the writings of Thomas Paine. Can any of you say this? Thomas Paine Collected WritingsISBN I-883011-03-5 Thomas Jefferson WritingsISBN 0-940450-16-X (a 1548 page book). both from the Library of America Maggie " +" A great and grand success.... Moment of Joy! What brought me to Wikipedia was the lack of information in the article of Meera. In mid-April 2012, after spending nearly 3 and a half months, I planned to add to those article which are seldom edited by others. Those included the Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad, articles related to it and soap opera articles. Soap operas are ongoing so I have to edit them daily but the article on the Nawabs is a piece of history...and I took up the work alone. Later, in May some editors helped me to fix typos and grammatical errors, but soon withdrew back their help. But, by God's grace I finished with the work today on 4 August 2012 and would love to share this success with you! My condition was same as the flying man in the pic, trying to catch a several things at the same time before it's too late. I don't know whether he succeeds or not, bu I did succeed! However, I still have to add some references and summarize the plots of soap opera articles in the soap opera articles. If you want, then you can help. Thank you for all who helped me all these days...thank you again! (২০১২) Review of the following needed Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad Murshid Quli Khan Sarfaraz Khan Shuja-ud-Din Muhammad Khan Alivardi Khan Siraj ud-Daulah Mir Jafar Mir Qasim Najimuddin Ali Khan Najabut Ali Khan Ashraf Ali Khan Baber Ali Khan Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan Ahmad Ali Khan Mubarak Ali Khan (Nawab of Bengal) Mansur Ali Khan Hassan Ali Mirza Wasif Ali Mirza Waris Ali Mirza Bade Achhe Lagte Hain Byaah Hamari Bahoo Ka Kya Huaa Tera Vaada Kuch Toh Log Kahenge Parvarrish – Kuchh Khattee Kuchh Meethi Saas Bina Sasural Adaalat C.I.D. (TV series) Crime Patrol (TV series) Indian Idol 6 Kahani Comedy Circus Ki Kaun Banega Crorepati Love Marriage Ya Arranged Marriage List of programs broadcast by Sony Entertainment Television (India) Thank you! (২০১২) " +You have my strong support, but I probably shouldn't vote this soon after being unbanned. Good luck. +So they are - doesn't look too serious. I'll keep an eye, tidy up when they get bored, and if necessary warn them that talk page access may be disabled if they don't stop. Thanks. +" Million Award The Million Award For your contributions to bring Koala (estimated annual readership: 1,239,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox: If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, " +List of manga magazines I made a section on the talk-page regarding demographics. I do not think they should be included as it lends WP:UNDUE weight towards one particular sex. Unless you can properly source the magazines as being exclusive just to male or female it is also against WP:V. - +" Deletion of Minority Posts Why did you delete this question yet again? Are you upset that I will not ""shuffle off, boy"" when you tell me? Do you lack the courage to keep the question here? Do you enjoy branding African-American posters as ""unnotable"" and laughing about it at your Klan meeting?" +Oh how very naughty of me, get a life it had nothing to do with you, you just stuck your big fat nose into my business with thingy up there, you brought it upon yourself to change my edits and get involved, grow up you child! +Removal of Jan 08 ban announcement. The reason i keep removing that is simple because first of all the above warmings are not mine. they were here before i got on this system. I have no idea what that is all about. Second I am putting this response in because I know I will only be banned again. To be honest I did not realize that removing information about The Book of revelation was a banning offense. There was information that i thought was irrelavant to the book. As a firm believer of the bible any part of it being assume to have been written by a crazy person to me is just wrong. So i removed it. DID NOT REALIZE I WAS VANDALIZING. Now i know i will only be banned again, but i honestly did not know that was vandalizm. there have been a lot of things that have been removed and no one was banned. I apologize for offending you or who ever i did offend. Now that i have had my say and promise not to 'vandalize' again go ahead and banned me again. by the way if this is a user page for me why can't i remove messages that offend me? I'm ready for the banned. hold my head down and prepare. +RE: Edinburgh Meetup I'm sorry, I can't, for a number of reasons. Apologies. Good luck with organising the meetup! Hope it goes well! ~~~~ +"::In response to this comment ""(no ethnic Macedonians and certainly no ethnic Thracians!! And certainly many ethnicities."" from above. Apparently there is check out this and this. Apparently there are ""ethnic thracians"". " +" The Enid Try as I might, I can't see the point of linking the ""B"" side of a non-notable single; it's not as if it's a cover of an existing song. Is there a reason for this? Cheers. andemu " +Less players There are about 300,000 players. See: http://www.tibia.com/gameguides/?subtopic=newcomer +The anime in the background. Was wondering if anyone could confirm this with me because I'm pretty sure that was a scene from the hentai series Cool Devices. +Hills Road Sixth Form College Seconding the above - change for the sake of change helps nobody. Please justify your major revisions on the talk page. 86.146.153.228 +" Per MOS I'm keying off the very first bullet point: ""If possible, an article title is the subject of the first sentence of the article"". The article name is ""Breast"", and so the subject of first sentence should match. As others have pointed out, the subject is ""Breast"" not ""Breasts"", a subtle yet distinct difference. I'd also point to WP:CON, your change doesn't appear to have that either. † " +Here go louis: RabbitInABlenderCorp. 42 Oxford St Phone 04242 642742 London City Fax 24240 247246 London MM42 42M M Freeman Grumpy Old Teacher Ltd. 22 Complaint St Misery Town Gwynedd LI36 99E 22 March 2006 Dear Mr Freeman I am writing to thank you for your letter of 21 March and hope to hear future feedback on our tumble dryers. I wish to express my utter apology for the poor standard of our tumble dryers that you recently have received. I assure you that the fault was not of the manufacturers, but of the transport company that we hire to deliver our products. The tumble dryers left our company in perfect condition, and therefore were not properly packaged into the lorries and were damaged in the journey. As for the colour schemes, we are to believe that the tumble dryers were being delivered along side some cans of paint and must have got mixed up along the way. We will have a word with the delivery company to sort out the problem and so future deliveries should arrive in the high standard expected of our company. In the meantime might we interest you in some exclusive discount vouchers on future orders. Find enclosed our brochure. Your Sincerely N Thorpe Complaints Manager Ref. ASK/ME +Alarbus, another question, if that's OK. I was thinking more about how the discussions went and I remembered this comment of yours. To be honest, I can't say I took that into account when I decided on the form of the RfC, as I can't now remember when I saw the comment (it wasn't immediately after you posted it). However, I do remember taking your position to be against free discussion and for formal voting, since that's what you seemed to be commenting on in my old post that you diffed. That might have influenced me in constructing the RfC. Did I misunderstand? I don't mean to harass you or step out of my intended neutrality, so please ignore this if you like. I'm genuinely trying to understand if I could have run this RfC better, in case I run another in the future, so I want to understand the positions of those who don't like it. Thanks (talk - contribs - ) +, as are the civilian casualties +Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for advertising +If you think you are clever, you make a big mistake. Go to school, little stupid pig. Wikipedia is not for you, sucker. +" ""irrevelant""? So that is the standard of editing at Wikipedia, huh? - Ash Long, Director, Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd" +I noticed that too. The year of birth is clearly wrong and so I'm going to remove that and the reference. +This article needs a huge clean up, possibly a rewrite. +sorry, but you're giving so many wrong informations. you are misleading the readers. Please be more accurate because your provided informations are FULL OF ERRORS. sorry, but you're giving so many wrong informations. you are misleading the readers. Please be more accurate because your provided informations are FULL OF ERRORS. +" I'll bet milk amazes you you thick asshole... now block this IP quick you dumb mother fucker!! cos we gonna play some games!! This is one of the weirdest experiences I have EVER had. There is some blatant INCESTUOUS vandalstic remarks and they have been put their by a guy who I proved has 2 sock puppets at least and how he left the remark with one and then reverted it with the other... and nothing..? the worlds dumbest detectives basically... ""ze good fight""... I'll tell you what. I'll bet that it's the other way around.. I'll bet that if you claim that someone said something, YOU have to back it up, not that the whole universe has to prove that they didn't say something... how does one prove that another person DIDN't say something anyway?? The truth,,.. you guys are german teens ja? I have amillion IPs so do what you want you incest boys! " +Links Look, I'm not too happy either that the BAPS link has to be on this page, but as long as the link to this article is on the BAPS page, the BAPS link will stay UNDETERRED. +You have now been blocked from editing. +Sorry. I didn't see that you had replied. Thanks for the tips. I didn't know that travel books could be used. Also, thanks for the tips for Flicker image transfer. I may have heard that before, but it was so long ago. I am currently staying in Grovetown, Georgia, which is near the eastern terminus of Georgia State Route 223, contains the western terminus of Georgia State Route 388, and is near the southern terminus of Georgia State Route 383. Those are the 3 SRs that I have been working on lately. If I get some time, maybe I can take some photos. Google didn't show anything, except for some stuff on Flicker, but I haven't been able to get the owner to let me use them. +" February 2009 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (speak) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." +" I agree with you, Lar, in most respects - but Cenarium is, I believe, the person primarily responsible for the most recent (and seemingly successful, if not implemented) proposal and poll for FlaggedRevs. T " +was actually just taking information from the results table and outting the project manages into week 4. Ok?!?!?! +Oh noes, indeed! Mighty 'Zilla homeless AND friendless? What's a dino to do? +Are you a racist? Do you have something against North Korea? 85.202.40.145 +Whatever. I just think whoever took those singers off are lazy, if anything try to help the cat by trying to find reliable sources. And I personally believe Youtube is a good source. Its open to anyone and is both audio and visual proof. But can't I just upload a song and put it on a singers article as an audio sample. Cause some singers I can't find anything on youtube. Not even rachelle ferrell. And I have a list of 55 singers, the song, and the note they hit in the whistle register. +|decline=So you admit to being repeatedly disruptive, even after warnings, but think that the block lengths didn't increase gradually enough? No, I don't think I'm inclined to unblock on that basis. — +Yes, well done James. Beautifully researched and written by Joe, too. (talk · contribs · email) +" ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section." +And thanks for beating User talk:Wknight94 to the draw. ) +I looked at the log file but I don't know why that was archived. I have increased the amount of log information that is kept; please let me know if this happens again. — Carl ( · talk) +Excuse me - I just noticed this. As Domer48 says, the comments I made to the SSP did seem to go unnoticed.. until Domer48 noticed them. My actual comments were not noticed though - only the fact that I had made them. I am apparently currently blocked for Sock Puppetry, despite there not having been sufficient dialogue - a decision which was made, by you, only yesterday - after I had attempted to address some of the accusations that have been made. How can you have reached any kind of conclusion without having attempted to listen to the person being accused? I was not given any warning of this impending ban, and my attempt at addressing the situation and sorting it out was ignored. I'm left wondering what I was blocked for.. was it for editing an archived discussion, or was it for the allegation of Sock Puppetry? As I said on the Setanta747 talk page, I don't understand why you haven't assumed good faith on this matter, and tried to help me, as I've obviously tried to address matters (albeit in a perhaps unconventional way). Your suggestions as to how to proceed would have been most welcome, especially given that you seem to know the system (as do some of the accusers). Allegations of sock puppetry, gaming are wholly incorrect, while that may appear on the surface to be the case, and I am not being afforded an opportunity to address this. As you personally closed the case yesterday (ignoring the comments I had made), I'd like to request that you re-open the case for me. Thanks in advance. 90.206.36.159 +" Thanks again D. Despite appearances, I am pretty much a Wikipedia newbie. I am also weary and about to get some rest for the next few battles on the horizon.:) " +Can you put it up back, Here are 3 citations, all written by ex-RAW official B. Raman http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/nov/30raman.htm http://toprack.blogspot.com/2007/12/kaoboys-of-r-by-b-raman-and-indias.html http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers32%5Cpaper3154.html +Dick Merrill I think it was great of you to do a Wikipedia page for Dick Merrill. He was one of the Old Heads retired around Miami back in the 1960s and a fine guy. +editing under signature of 151.201.48.208 on AfD page editing under signature Draktus by 151.201.48.208 on AfD page +) Fuck you. Eat shit and die. +Regarding Sunil Grover (Actor) Page Hi, Thanks for the reply please check the reference link and correct the same. Thanks again reference link https://twitter.com/WhoSunilGrover/status/631687958437871616 +" As it can relate to either the opposite of intelect or where a person originates, I thought I'd clear both up. But, onto a relevant subject, you are honestly telling me that saying that ""unfortunately the people who accuse Cradle of Filth of selling out don't realise they were doing it from the very start"" is less POV then just leaving the article as it is? ≈ " +Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia. Just a note, if you wish to edit artocles as a test, use the sandbox. Thanks +For example, The Marilyn Diptych is a 1962 silkscreen painting by American pop artist Andy Warhol. In 2004, it was named the third most influential piece of modern art in a survey of 500 artists, critics, and others.[4] +Article needing translation +This song did reach the top of the Rap charts, so maybe this should have an article. +And on the other hand, do not return unsourced content to articles as you did to Fred Jones (Scooby-Doo). MM207.69.139.137 +" Yeah I've gotten a few ""Do you know what you just did?!?! posts when I've done it accidentally without even realizing it. The whole problem would be fixed if the watchlist rollback acted like the diff rollback (asking you for an edit summary). - '''''' τ ¢ " +" In addition, what's with this note on the history page by Pacdude? ""(Filled in Studio Manager's full name. The GM should know it.)"". No edit by me was made to that name and, in addition, that's the girl's full name! " +" The gallery now works in Firefox 1.5, Internet Explorer and Opera. - contrib talk " +T:public transport did you mean to say that? +How extremely fabulous for you that you you have delared you the ultimate authority of all things you believe in and therefore you should totally rule wikipedia you fabulous creature you, Jeff G. I'm not sure why, but YOU have decided within SECONDS of my posting, that YOU know so much MORE than anyone else that YOU must have the final word! There are many words for this kind of behavior, Jeff G. The words that spring immediately to mind are butthead, smartass, bully, and creep. I'm sure there are others, but these will suffice to epress my current state of mind at being thwarted in my simple attempts to express myself, you facist nazi, etc. +It's kind of like if the article on nitrogen was mostly about various liquid nitrogen vendors and chemical companies. – (talk) +Appalling. 'F' for Fail == As it now stands, this article is grossly inadequate and misleading. The 'development' at the centre of a sonata structure is in reality a 'Durchführung' i.e. a 'leading through' various keys. The word 'development' is a poor translation of this and has generated a situation in which foolish people analyse a stretch of music not according to what happens in it, but in terms of what this wrong word happens to make them think of. As every German muscologist and textbook knows, the point of a 'development section' is *not* various varietites of 'thematic modification' it is *tonal and harmonic instability* after the stability of the second-subject key and before the restoration of the tonic. Has no-one actually bothered to listen to what does and doesn't happen in the included extract...?!? IT'S MODULATORY, AND THAT'S ALL. This article is too deeply confused to be rescued. It should just be deleted. Hell, it doesn't have a single worthwhile source... or any idea about the original German terminology... Pathetic... == +"HI ARROGANT CATHOLIC-PANDERING DUMB FUCK, STOP LYING FUCKHEAD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Citations_missing#Inline_citations_are_not_required_by_policy 1. Inline citations are not required by policy No policy requires inline citations. They are often a good idea, and are a requirement for feature article status, but it is not a requirement for all articles. Furthermore, the tag is often used when the article has adequate sources. This tag therefore enshrines a particular editor's view about style (that the article in question should have inline citations) in an inappropriate way. That point belongs on the talk page, not in the article itself. Robert A.West (Talk) Where does it say that featured articles have different requirements then other articles? Jeepday The whole point in to get citations for all articles so that they meet the WP:V requirements, I have noticed that tags quite often help by bringing this to attention of users, particularly new-ish users. Cheers SeanMack I agree with Jeepday and SeanMack. Our ultimate goal should be for every article to be of FA quality. Satori Son That goal is not consensus among editors. But more importantly, inline citations for every fact are not an FA requirement; see WP:FA? section 1c. CMummert · talk 2. I GAVE THE LINK TO WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO YOU FUCK SO HOW CAN YOU NOT SAY THAT I DID NOT PROVIDE A REFERENCE FUCKTARD? WELL LYING FUCK? 2. FUCKTARD HOW CAN I PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO A DELETED POST YOU FUCKIN MORON? 3: FUCKHOLE DEATHTARD, FOR THE SECOND TIME HERE IS THE CITATION FUCKHOLE AND THIS TIME ON DISPLAY FOR YOUR FUCKHOLE EYES: Teacher knows something about Catholic bashing Posted by Alex Murphy On Religion 02/22/2007 9:46:01 AM PST · 78 replies · 835+ views The Bakersfield Californian ^ | Feb 21 2007 | LEONEL MARTINEZ My catechism teacher, Sister Mary Lou Petrillo, was a smart and scrappy nun who drilled into us the basics of Catholicism without demeaning other Christian churches or religions. Too bad Sister Mary Lou isn't available to teach a few intensive lessons on tolerance to the campaign people of presidential candidate John Edwards. Within the last few weeks, two bloggers for the former North Carolina senator resigned after being hit with criticism from conservative Catholic organizations angered by past anti-Catholic remarks the bloggers posted on the Web, according to CNN. Melissa McEwan and Amanda Marcotte quit after groups like the Catholic... (EXPLETIVE DELETED) CATHOLIC BASHING (Reinhard) Posted by jazusamo On News/Activism 02/15/2007 9:04:00 AM PST · 18 replies · 940+ views The Oregonian ^ | February 15, 2007 | David Reinhard Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, it's time to play that favorite game of conservatives and Republicans ""What if . . ."" Todaywe have a special ""twofer"" edition of the game that asks: ""What would happen if a Republican tried something like this?"" Pay attention, double-standard mavens, because this is a multipronged question today: What if . . . . . . a Republican presidential candidate hired a blogmaster whose writings featured vile attacks on other religions and expletive-laced rants against those who disagreed with her? . . . the same Republican also hired another blogger whose writings featured similar... ""The Catholic League"", mighty champion of ....gay bashing and anti-semitism ? (Propaganda alert!) Posted by Joseph DeMaistre On Religion 12/09/2006 8:55:50 PM PST · 21 replies · 592+ views Talk to Action ^ | Sun Jun 25, 2006 | By Bruce Wilson Hate speech is typically the first line of attack employed by bullies, but bullies become emboldened when eliminationalist rhetoric is tolerated, and that societal acceptance can lead to far worse things. I've previously covered hate speech - see Enough Hate Spech To Stun An Ox, and Hatecrime.org has an extensive collection of hate speech targeting homosexuals. Suprisingly - or not - at least one individual whose statements are featured in that archive ( and also in collections of antisemitic rhetoric ) is also leader of a prominent Christian right group that claims to fight against anti-Catholic bias and discrimination who... CATHOLIC-BASHING PLAYS ARE HOT Posted by NYer On News/Activism 08/18/2006 3:46:38 PM PDT · 23 replies · 548+ views Cath +"==Hey== Hey there. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you seem to have an interest in editing articles about Red Hot Chili Peppers. Might I point you in the direction of WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers? It's a place where some of us collaborate together on RHCP articles. As an aside, you recently add some info and a link to Californication (album). I don't think it's a reliable source (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources) as it appears to be a fairly new, non-notable website. I reverted that edit, but if you think that I'm in the wrong please contact me at my talk page. ;) " +Perhaps a good compromise would be to move the last version of the main page to WP:Incubator in which there should be no problems with the issues of ownership or conflict of interest? (hint) - Stillwaterising (talk) +GA Review of Walter Oesau Hello Again! I am genuinely glad to see you as the reviewer. I will definitely make every attempt to address the concerns raised in the review. However at this time I have a bit spotty wiki-time, due to other preoccupations. I am going to make a point of trying to address at least one point a day. But that's stretch. I hope you will be considerate. I am afraid I can offer may be 15 days as my deadline. I am sorry I just can't offer anything concrete. +Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. (討論) +People Killed Why does this article say 73 mill people were killed? I've heard considerable lesser numbers of people than that. Chris. +It wasn't spurious, it was just too messy for action. You are not thinking straight, Jusdafax. You seem to think WP works on some strict legal principles and it doesn't - WP:COMMONSENSE applies and editing aggressively on a controversial article is sanctionable. I encourage you to think with your Wikipedia hat on - progress is made on difficult articles though careful discussion on article talk pages, focused on content and sources, not contributors, and using WP:DR when things get deadlocked. Please don't encourage Prokaryotes to edit aggressively. +And yours is what? To disrupt? Make baseless accusations? Hmm. Anyone is free to look at the work I've done here, as well as on the Spanish Wikipedia. Reach your own conclusions. Compare. I have nothing to hide. Can you say the same? +A gentle nudge, in case you overlooked my post above. +While I agree with that concept, the semi protection straw poll passed 104 to 4 in favor of implementation. We are trying it out, per se, to see how it is working. Nothing in the semi protection guidelines suggests that any article should be semi protected for any period longer than to get past a vandalism wave. +" Unreliable source This does not meet WP:RS. An ""fsnet"" domain name is free webhosting, so it's just someone with a website. The banner reads ""Sinn Fein/IRA where (sic) nothing more..."" so it doesn't seem to have ""an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight"". Removed the unreliable source, and requested citation. 303 " +" Well that is what I am trying to say - if you are saying that they can be traced back to the Steppes (!), then why limit saying that it originates from Somerset? Just because ""oo ar"" has entered common popular consciousness thanks to the Wurzels, it doesn't mean that the term originated with them. Surely to list the words using specific evidence in the form of the first recorded usage of that word or phrase is the best way, otherwise list the word or phrase ""West country"". It is an archaic publication, but you may be interested in reading (if you havn't already) ""Wilkinson Sherren's The Wessex of Romance (London: Chapman & Hall, 1902)"" - an extract is here: http://www.yale.edu/hardysoc/Resources/glossary.htm " +"Just so you know, I have reverted your edit. Per the WP:SPA's edit summary, ""Flat out lies and malicious personal attacks on the media personality Richard ""Mack"" Machowicz without any factual references or evidence. Please restrict edits to individuals who have at least set up Wiki accounts. - the edits were made by Wiki accounts, so this reversion was not valid. " +I reverted because the established citation style of the article does not follow the format you changed it to (which I explained from the get-go), the tracklist template is unnecssary and not mandatory, and some links were added by another user that weren't valid sources (one was even a broken link). This article is a featured article, and has already been vetted for quality, so most of your changes are profoundly unneeded and unrequired. +And keep away from the asteroids article. +" Noted. Just trying to be helpful ) | talk " +calm down. i was only furthering chrisO's established method of pov-pushing. +I will be discussing use of the internet with all members of this household, including friends, and any unconstructive additions will be undone. +GWAH!! (fuck you nigger) +The message of his email was informal, but portrayed a concise view about the current Northeast Project that the CCP finances. His message was based upon his views from personal fieldwork and references of many peer-reviewed papers. His articles says the same thing, but in a more scholarly manner.kwayzguy +Please sign your comments. +Quite understandable; I'm getting some practice in it at Wii, but it's not the easiest thing to master. In that case, I'll be changing the two footnote-style references match the others. +history I consider simple history! +" Music and Academics A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Music and Academics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Music and Academics. GW_Simulations | Talk " +I think it is time to review the idea of incorporating the 3 new Dolphin class into the article somewhere, briefly. The new vessels are slightly larger 212s with AIP. They seem to be the most sophisticated subs ever built by Germany. Happy to discuss. +" Respiraţia a Doua http://respi.org/ what's your connection with ""Second Breath""? You know what I mean. " +" WP:SAMPLE#Guidelines → ""As a rule of thumb, samples should...."" " +This bot is seriously driving us crazy This image exists, I must kill it! +Baris, don't start again. It's admins' duty to enforce community consensus, and the latest XFD producing a consensus was the RFD. What's your point? +Welcome to Wikipedia as a logged in user. I see you have joined the WikiProject named Harry Potter. That could be a mistake. I am lurking in the shadows. I'll see you July 16th. 6 July 2005 21:03 (UTC) +Please look at this guy's talk history. He started it. Yes thats childish but I blame him. I was a good wikipedian before I met him. he sucks. He adds nothing, just vandalises stuff, and was rude to me -check my page history. He should clearly be kicked off wikipedia. P.S., I know igonorance is not a crime, but we have to draw the line somewhere. +It's out of place, as it stands. There's a section on general literary criticism of Rand, and then an entire section by Skousen discussing only The Fountainhead. If it belongs at all, it belong in the article on The Fountainhead, not here. +never being laid or getting a boner +" If ""assume good faith"" applies anywhere, it applies here." +" Response to your comment Wow, I didn't think anyone even read my userpage, let alone noticed changes! I took out that bit because I de-stubbed an article about an obscure ancient Jewish royal, Mariamne, which hits on two of my fields of study. I've also done tweaks to a couple of articles about feminist philosophers, so it seemed disingenous to leave in. Besides, I'm trying to work more on adding good content to WP instead of just reverting and removing bad content, so I thought I'd take it out. How's the vandal-fighting going? ) Talk " +" Why must you be so ignorant. If you're so concerned about it then why don't you verify the facts for yourself? And I have already made citations, you're just not bothering to check them out. Where are YOUR citations, Mr Weekend Wannabe? Please, give me a break here, this was a Cat 4 SS Storm. Look at the table long and hard my good man. For the last time, what you're proposing is this: ""A cyclone that brought about more than the effects and damages of a typical Category 4 storm and that had the Central Pressure of a typical Category 5 storm, is in fact a mere Category 3, simply because it's confirmed/measured sustained winds were 5 knots below the ""cut-off"" for Category 4."" Go ahead, expolit your admin rights, it's all you're good for. " +" First, trying to pull ""rank"" with me, is not an effective way to be persusive with me or to appear as an ally or friendly. Second, you have misread my statement and missed my major point about vagina and penis. The point is that the article itself explans that a vaginoplasty is surgery to create a vagina. It is therefore obvious that any photographs of surgery in and around a penis or vagina will contain such things in the photograph. I believe that is is entirely appropriate to set the example that photographs of genitalia in medical and educational contexts are appropriate for all audiences. I believe that the precedent should be set that the penis and the vagina or more accurately in most cases the vulva should not be given special attention in medical contexts. To do so, gives the misimpression that there is something ""wrong"" with human genitalia, which is a falsehood, and an antedeluvian cultural bias whose primitive nature should be abolished. In this century and millenium, is it time for such puritanical prudishness to end. One of the best ironies of discussions about such ""warnings"" around medical photos is that they primarily serve to heighten the existence and nature of the photographs, and probably invite more study of them than might otherwise occur. In other words, they have the opposite of their intended purpose. The tend to draw more attention to such material, than might otherwise occur, while the tacit intention of people who want to put similarly silly warnings about such material is to ""hide"" them and be bashful around them. It is high time that humans grow up and get over this silly aversions to the site of human genitalia. The wikipedia should be a place that sets an appropriate standard that medical information should be free from the psuedo censorship that such ""warnings"" represent. On another note, on the basis of WP:V, a large portion of the wikipedia would be candidate for deletion. I believe such mention constitutes evidence that this article is being given unfair over-attention by a tacit faction whose true purpose is to censor subjects like the sort to which Toby Meltzer and its ""Good Article"" subject matter relates. First and foremost, such good articles serve to refute the rampant misinformation in the minds of the average populace. 21:17, 17 September 2006." +" Thank you for experimenting with the page Satellite on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk • contribs • [/wiki/User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js?username= count]) (Respond to me on my Talk.) " +Thanks That was the IP's second go, thanks for fixing it. I wonder if it's related to your post to our pages? We must have something in common. +" Speedy deletion of Credit Card Insider You have randomly removed my tag for the deletion of Credit Card Insider, which is a promotion-inducing article for a non-notable company, without any discussion being done.                     ~Rayvn  " +" Bloody Saturday Bloody Saturday in this article refers to the bombing of Shanghai, but if you click on the link it is about a Canadian work strike. Can somebody fix this? contribsTALK " +has launched an orchestrated and nefarious plot to get me blocked from Wikipedia. He has fabricated erstwhile web pages and cooked up so-called incriminating pictures to frame me for a violation of which I plead categorical innocence. Ask yourself one question: Why was on my user page in the first place? I can only assume that he was fishing for information that would serve as the launching point for his latest underhanded scheme. It's a sad day for Wikipedia when its administrators are hoodwinked by the puerile kookery of . +" Hahaha! Trying to bury the truth again. It won't work. Try to antagonize me again, Ian Thompson, try it and see what happens to you ""Evolution"" does not exist. It is a farcical science fiction spoof. Get it through your head Facts 1. There is not one single observance of ""evolution"", a species morphing into another species, in the entire recorded history of biology 2. Unicellular organisms DO NOT convert into multi-cellular organisms 3. There is not one single ""transitional"" fossil found anywhere on Earth, despite billions of fossil findings 4. Is it not genetically possible for a DNA code to add or subtract chromosomes (change into another species) 5. Every single scientific and biological fact known to man proves that ""evolution"" (a species morphing into another species) does not exist and never could exist Once again, get this mental pollution out of your heads. It's over for you and your crock theory." +ATTENTION! I think you misunderstand us kiwis. We all know each other's business, because we all know each other. COI makes no sense in New Zealand. This makes it unsurprising that we get so irritated by your attempts to enforce Wikipedia's rules upon our ways of doing things - in our eyes it's cultural colonisation. We also try to bend the UN to our will as well. +Hesperian Thanks for that. Hesperian +"::The section is about the revival in Buddhism in India, which itself is very small. Since I knew about FWBO before I ever hit this article, and I'm an ignorant American, I doubt highly it's not notable. You and Freedom Skies may very well hate FWBO, and think it's evil and dangerous. I think Koenraad Elst is evil and dangerous. Furthermore, I think he's an apologist for a dangerous right-wing Hindu Nationalist organization. In addition, I think he's manipulating good men for his own twisted ends. But I will defend to the end his right to be in this article. He is here he should be here, and his views should stay. I'm not just talking about this article, I'm talking about almost every article he's cited in. You have my word on that. Despite what some (or perhaps all) people think, I'm not an idiot. I submit that our readers aren't idiots as well. If you can't see that I'm trying to make this and all articles more credible, and therefore more influential (which helps everybody), then I might as well walk away right now.  (talk • contribs • [ logs]) " +And why has no-one even so much as told User:RepublicanJacobite not to break the 3RR? Why exactly is he being allowed to break it with impunity? I think I shall get myself a new IP address rather soon. +help required I'm looking for a help to create an article about Polish antisemitism in 1968. I would be glad if you could help me translate this article ande help establish the historical truth, as you allways do. thank you. +" Terrible page.... I know I could go ahead and edit the page to improve it, but right now the only thing I can think of is to delete all the text and replace it with something like ""This is a film"". Really, this is insanely poorly written drivel." +A topic of interest to you is covered by Arbcom sanctions The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision. Thank you, +July 2008 (UTC) I've just shamelessly scoured Flickr and uploaded a bunch of CC images of a sunny UN building at different angles (I wasn't sure which angle you thought was dodgy). I think one of them has some flare issues but it's probably nothing the graphics lab can't sort out. You are right to say other boroughs should be represented, but as an outsider I can't think of a non-Manhattan landmark that is thought of as quintessentially New York. 19:57, 31 +"|Nefariousski: |WP:WTA#Myth and Legend |(relevent sections) ""Formal use of the word is commonplace in scholarly works, and Wikipedia is no exception...be consistent; referring to ""Christian beliefs"" and ""Hindu myths"" in a similar context may give the impression that the word myth is being used informally."" Being that the usage of ""Creation Myth"" in articles (and their titles) about creation myths is near unanimous across different belief systems changing this convention for Judeo-Christian related articles violates the word and spirit of WP:WTA. A sample of the other articles are as follows: |Chinese creation myth |Sumerian creation myth |Ancient Egyptian creation myths |Pelasgian creation myth |Tongan creation myth |Mesoamerican creation myths |Creation Myth |Keeping in mind that this isn't a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS since WP:WTA makes a specific example for uniform usage and the usage of ""Creation Myth"" is clearly the dominant usage for Religious and Supernatural cosmogenical articles. |*WP:RNPOV |Usage of ""Creation Myth"" is clearly in line with this policy. The policy states ""Wikipedia articles on history and religion draw from a religion's sacred texts as well as from modern archaeological, historical, and scientific sources."" The latter three almost unanimously use the term ""Creation Myth"" while the first describes it as a historical fact (which we cannot due for a myriad of reasons that I'm sure everyone reading this understands). |At best if any reliable sources can be found that are critical of usage of the term ""Creation Myth"" (not myth as a stand alone since the Electoral College can not be classified as a College any more than definitions of myth, particularly the informal/colloquial definitions can be applied to the term ""Creation Myth"") a section disucssing this criticism should be added to the article and the main Creation Myth article but shouldn't contradict usage of the term per ""Some adherents of a religion might object to a critical historical treatment of their own faith because in their view such analysis discriminates against their religious beliefs. Their point of view must be mentioned if it can be documented by notable, reliable sources, yet note that there is no contradiction."" |Per the section that states ""Several words that have very specific meanings in studies of religion have different meanings in less formal contexts, e.g. fundamentalism and mythology. Wikipedia articles about religious topics should take care to use these words only in their formal senses in order to avoid causing unnecessary offense or misleading the reader."" editors of this article have, in good faith, created a FAQ, cited formal definitions, wikilinked to the main Creation myth article (which also has a detailed formal definition) and added a footnote to the the term ""Creation Myth"" to further clarify formal usage. All of which meet and possibly exceed the due diligence required to ensure that the formal meaning is understood. |*WP:UCN |Usage of ""Creation Myth"" in the title has been furthermore contested after the first article RM, another RM was started about a week later to remove the term from the title, that RM also was declined and closed (albeit with some arguement and complaint regarding it possibly being closed too soon). UCN tells us ""Articles are normally titled using the most common English-language name of the subject of the article. In determining what this name is, we follow the usage of reliable sources, such as those used as references for the article"", considering the vast majority of cited sources including archaelogical, scientific, historical and other scholarly/academic writings use the term ""Creation Myth"" as opposed to other colloquial variants the title meets UCN. |Furthermore the usage of ""Creation Myth"" abounds in reliable sources doing a quick google search shows that it's use clearly meets the ""common usage"" section of UCN ""Common usage in reliable sources is preferred to technically correct but rarer forms, whether the official name, the scientific name, the birth name, the original name or the trademarked name"" UCN also tells us ""Where articles have descriptive titles, they are neutrally worded. A descriptive article title should describe the subject without passing judgment, implicitly or explicitly, on the subject. "" alternatives such as ""Story"" or ""account"" imply value judgements regarding veracity one way or the other (Story commonly being defined as fiction, account commonly being used in factual / historical context). Additionally changing the name causes a loss of precision (also discussed in UCN) since ""Creation Myth"" is the formally defined academic term and as such doesn't allow for any ambiguity (only one definition) whereas other alternatives do. |Some editors have brought up di +Your type is a dime a dozen. These officers and deputies were brought to the attention of myself, leutenants, captains and commanders by leading citizens and even other officers who felt they were working against the best interests of the particular department. A truly good police officer or deputy knows how to use their position of responsibility as a service to a community. Your kind is what we call a -. The only place you are good for is....gee I can't think of one as to be a good police officer, one must keep his head and be a role model for a community - even the wikipedia community. You exemplify a role model for at most, a prison guard. Try and learn something from this exchange and ask yourself a few honest questions and answer them honestly. The day will not come where I back off or cow-tow to the likes of you. +The statement that Wolin formally was never subordinated to Gniezno is supported also by the work of Gerard Labuda, Marian Biskup, Historia dyplomacji polskiej, PWN 1980, vol. 3, p. 123 11:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC +Yes the Razor link is to the same 1950's article. Link a ref, I have no preference. ?!? +Hello, I see what I did became reverted. Yes, there is several ways to spell modern name for Yerevan. Problem is that Yerevan is in Armenian. The persian spelling is originally from Ilkhanid times and we see diverse spelling like Airavan, Irevan, Erevan and much more. The spelling used by EI is one I adopted. I thought it would be easy just to say Yerevan, but seems people are upset. I know Encyclopedia of Islam (English and Turkish version) will have articles about this and also the book by the American scholar Bournotian as someone above mentioned. His work is considered the most important work and most authorative on the topic and is a big book opposed to several page article in iranian encyclopedia. Also, anyone who studies this state will affeliate it with nothing but Persian empire of Safavids and Qajars and anyone between,. I studied bournoutian book beofre and he spends a lot to explain about ethnic groups of persians, kurds, armenians, and Turkic tribes (dozens!) with specific names and islaimc denominations, I think Qizil Bash, Qara Qoyunli (tribe name, not to be confused with famous states and organization associated with names), these Turkic people were not referred to as Azeris, but muslim tribesmen. I will get book soon and cite explanation for this. I understand and I share your sincere love to own people, its history and culture, but this has no any relation to modern republic of azerbaijan.24.24.200.113 +" BBC did indeed release it's list of ""Top 100"" based on 30,000 respondents. BBC's numerical ""rankings"" of the 100 apparently weren't disclosed until, after the ""poll"" was rather heavily flogged in a series of broadcasts, in which each of the ""Top 10"" were advocated by various celebrities/authorities/commentators, and during which time a vastly larger number of ""voters"" called in. I seem to remember the final number on order of 130,000. Whether or how this affected final rankings, is apparently unknown. Obviously these people were if nothing else, in some degree, TV fans. The Wikipedia article seems to fully accept the validity of the BBC ""poll"" (which was not at all focused on Scott). Further, the article implies (to me) that the poll revealed a decline, over time, in Scott's popularity with the British Public. Seems like a reasonable thesis, but without comparable ""polling"" data from previous periods, this is not more than interesting speculation on the part of whatever author is cited. For deep background, Wikipedia itself has a number of (non-featured) articles that are somewhat relevant with regard to the rather complex topic of polling, including sampling error margin of error, tracking poll, straw poll, and various other topics. I'm certainly uninformed. " +Apologies. This is the first time I've intervened on a Wikipedia Talk page and I'm not an expert on how it all works, so thanks for the tips. However, I really don't have a chip on my shoulder; I'm just concerned about the many more women newly diagnosed with BC who will chance upon this photo in the meantime... It seems to me that the discussion of the past few days has established a certain consensus, but per your instructions I'll keep checking in to read further points of view, including that of Jmh649. 93.35.4.194 +Thanks DS, I hope that blocking won't be necessary either. I will let you know if it occurs again. +December 2009 (UTC) It is not common (because almost every defendant in murder cases opts for a fast-track trial) but it may happen. A fast-track trial is a trial where no actual trial is involved. I'll try to explain it. A criminal proceeding in Italy consists of many phases: 1. preliminary investigations; 2. preliminary hearing; 3. trial; 4. appeals. After the preliminary hearing, the Judge only decides whether or not the evidence gathered so far is enough to sustain a case in Court. If so, he sends the defendant before the Judge of the Trial, where he will be convicted or acquitted; if not, the Judge sort of acquits the defendant. A defendant can, though, choose to give up his right to a trial. He will be, then, tried by the Judge of the Preliminary Hearing, who will hand down a judgement, based upon the evidence gathered so far. Since this is a reduction of the defendant's rights, it must be he who asks for a fast-track trial. In exchange for that, he is compensated with a lighter sentence. If there are two or more defendants, one may opt for a fast-track trial and the other choose to stick to the standard pattern. In this case, since it would be unfair (or so Italians think) to let the wishes of one of them take precedence over those of the other, the two defendants are tried separately, even though they committed the same crime. 14:05, 11 +there I like to clean this once a month +" Cedars of Lebanon Another one that needs revision.  (zootalk) " +Oh okay, well good luck if you decide to do anything else. As for Settlers, I'm not really running into any problems for now but if I need any help or suggestions I'll drop you a line. ) +" You should have a userbox ""this user is canadian, he is a french bastard"" " +" I believe that Cochrane is a high quality source. If Cochrane makes conclusions specifically about chiropractic, then we should feel free to use it as a source (regardless of whether the conclusions are positive or negative for chiropractic). However, we should not include Cochrane reviews which are only making conclusions about spinal manipulation in general (not specifically about chiropractic). Such reviews are best suited for the Spinal manipulation article. I am in the process of creating a detailed but clear RfC to address this matter in general, but if the editors here can generally agree to the proposal Eubulides describes here as: ""to remove citations to sources 'using research which does not make any conclusions about chiropractic specifically'"", then I see no need to open the RfC can of worms. discuss " +" Thank You The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar I award you this Barnstar for always being there to correct my edits and do all the nitty-gritty work with my references that I wouldn't know what to do with otherwise! Thank You very much " +A3]]. Quality check 13:18 +lord levy is one of the most powerful men in the uk his links w/ jewish care and comments on the fundraising skills he honed there r obviously worthy of note. +" Don't worry too much about it, if it gets speedy deleted this time around, copy it to your sandbox and work on it. But give WP:CORP a read. And if you don't mind me saying so, while it is no longer a clearcut copy-paste of it is still pretty close. Best, 🎤 - - P.S. We sign talk page posts with ~~~~" +I also found that this guy names Sever is like DA SUPA CHILLA of dem all...little gonden snub nosed maunkey! +Mr Dahn, I would be only too happy to deal only with facts. -TABSaving 300 000 lives against the odds, the pressure and the sheer logic, if one is criminally antisemitic through and through, is a fact sir. -TABDismantling the Iron Guard, a declared antisemitic and pro-german organization, is another paradox -TABMarying a Jewish lady as an antisemit, doesn’t make sense -TABAllowing the Jewish community to have official representatives, to befriend at least one of them, the lider of that community and to lend him an attentive ear and to let him convince you to change some of the previously issued orders and laws, does not, again, fit into an antisemitic profile. -TABAllowing some of the deported Jews in Transnistria to be repatriated, is not, again, an act of an atisemite. (It is another unprecedented act; can you quote one single similar occurrence in an Europe under the german boot?) Please explain this. My request is NOT rethorical. I do agree on your superior erudition in the matter, for all I know, you might be a historian, whereas I am just interested in history. And PLEASE don’t refer me to other books, reports, authors. Just give me your own opinion on the points above. Not your opinion that they do not matter, but how do you explain them? I accept your patronizing unpleasant as it may be, if you’ll just explain. And try to see my point: I DO accept the possibility of being wrong. I try to stay as objective as I can, but till now, I heard rather unilateral accusations, rather than specific proofs and facts. That’s the diference between us, when confronted with discrepancies, you sir seem to deliberately ignore them, because the authors you read do so; me, I start my own research. I have spoken personally to at least 50 people, who lived through those terrible times, not Jewish, unfortunately, but certainly not antisemitic. (It’s not much, but at least I did it; what’s YOUR personal research ?) They are spread over all major Romanian regions, my witnesses, covering many different trades. Not one, mind you, ever heard, much less witnessed, any antisemitic violence ORDERED BY ANTONESCU or his government on Romania – old territory. Please quote contrary evidence, first hand if possible. I confess, I couldn’t find Jewish witnesses, all my Jewish friends and aquaintances are too young for that, but I’m still looking. And excuse me, the accusation of “incomplete quoting” the Wiesel repport is ludicrous. Would you want me to quote the full text ? My point was that even in a report that I consider unilateral and biased (like a trial with prosecutors only and without defenders), important facts like apparently inexplicable acts of mercy and a definite orriginal Jewish policy, totally opposed to that of Germany, at a time when Germany was still all powerfull, could not be remained unnoticed. The Wiesel Commission itself, sir, could not ignore those facts; how can you ? The Wiesel Report allowed such colossal mistakes as blaming a whole state, a whole nation, I remember of having read the phrase “the crimes committed by Antonescu and the Romanian nation against Jews”. You never blame a whole nation, a whole population. The blame sir, is INDIVIDUAL, as Frederic Forsythe says. And so is the salvation. An intelligent man knows that when you deal with great numbers, you have to apply statistics, over-generalization is one of the most unforgivable acts. And such a phrase lies in the same report in which there are mentioned pro-Jewish acts, both from government level and from individuals, only to underline that they don’t count. And you want me to take such a report as gospel truth, a model of impartiality and justice ? MR MIRCION, kindly, get a grip on yourself. To state that Antonescu is “my hero” proves you didn’t even tried to read what I wrote; if so, how and what are you criticizing ? I repeat, to be sure Antonescu was involved in war crimes. Commited in war zones. He was not involved in crimes against humanity, in cold-blood premeditated murder, based on an ethnic cleansing policy, on the contrary, he tried, and partially succeeded to stop it, against considerable political pressure and certainly against the major antisemitic trend in a Germany dominated Europe. He is to be condemned, of course, but NOT for the wrong reasons. At the time of the reckoning, both good and bad deeds should be put in the balance. Romanians, sir, have the right to criticize, accuse, and condemn Antonescu. Not the Jewish people from Romania-old kingdom, since Antonescu saved 300 000 of them while sending almost half a million of his own people to their death. To be sure, this is just my opinion, but it’s based on facts. If you have explanations for the points lined up in the answer above to Mr Dahn’s reply, based on facts, not on second-h +Happy to be of some help. It's not hard to prod articles, just write {{Subst:prod| A good reason this article shouldn't be here}} . And that is with the {'s and }'s. Actually, I think speedy delete is much more practial- it's tends to be a situation where either speedy works, or the more heavy AFD -procedure must be invoked. The problem is users who hang around to protect their articles are actually allowed to remove the prod, but not the speedy template or the AFD. But you got the links now. +O hai ther. It's me, I CAME. Btw, this IP is from my Motorola Q smartphone. The IP address continually changes. +I think Wikipedia should promote good coding practices, and it's good practice to get into the habit of writing -w in the shebang line of all Perl programs. +" And you are citing the Polish neo-Nazi death sentence antisemitic homophobic nationalist revionist government?? LOL. Polish propaganda is notoriously unreliable. Btw. there never was a person named ""Jan Haweliusz from Gdańsk"" - his name was Johannes Hevelius and he was from Danzig. Greetings " +But Abeg92 is a faggot. +When somebody insult me, i give somebody an answer! Take it easy! Ciao, +Jay, you know nothing about Morris' scholarship, and very little about the WP:BLP policy – which is actually an important policy, notwithstanding your endlessly ignorant abuse of it. Stop harassing PR, and stop gumming up talk pages with balderdash. +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Xenotransplantation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ +" This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. See also: [ block list] | [ block log] | [ related IP addresses]059.023.232.103 — user:catapult " +(UTC) Still true! 23:47, 1 May 2009 +" User:Phoenix of9, you clearly do not have consensus to make your proposed edits and now that Warren's invocation at Obama's inauguration is in the past, you will have trouble finding editors who agree with you in attacking Warren (that's why it was protected prior to the inauguration). You already have had two other veteran editors of this article say that your edits were inappropriate (again, we just dealt with another editor similar to you) and I guarantee that at least two more editors would join us if you attempt to post them again. You also have absolutely zero credibility because of your admitted bias against Warren, so attempting to ""out-argue"" us is ridiculous. If you continue, all you will accomplish is getting this article protected again. You're not going to ""win"" this - walk away from the article. " +" Pilot I would like to see the source for the comment that the ""date of the pilot is often listed incorrectly as 26/12/86"" but was in fact broadcast in 1987. Both the idmb and the BBC Guide to Comedy list the pilot as first airing in 1986, and I should very much think the latter is an authorative source. " +" (B), because I feel it suits wikipedia more. Although I personally say ""black"" and ""white"", I think it would just look unprofessional in an article on Wikipedia. " +" You should look up the meaning of words before using them. For one, it seems you don't know what ""redundant"" means. My edit inserted brand new information, about the lifetime practice of anal sex, which is lacking in the entry because it displeases you, so it wasn't redundant. " +" They've forgotten what Jimbo so clearly stated at his user talk page ""I think there's a pretty strong case to be made for ""Climategate"" as the name for the article, as it is clearly the most common name in the press for this. I think it fairly obvious why people don't want it called that - but that call is not up to Wikipedia. We must call it what it is called, and what it is called, is climategate. (This is not a decree, but my point is that it is pretty obvious that - contrary to the wild claims of coverup and so on - we do have a well-sourced article that is comprehensive and informative and fair... but with a pretty silly title that no one uses. The scandal here is clearly not the ""hacking incident"" - about which virtually nothing is known. The scandal is the content of the emails, which has proven to be deeply embarrassing (whether fairly or unfairly) to certain people.) The result of the silly title is that there is traction (unfairly) for claims that Wikipedia is suppressing something. "" (oh he is just an ordinary user yeah). And we have the hole world reporting as this name Climategate usage in the first three/four months and in a longer and longer list of books . " +It would be inappropriate to split this article into each food/drink as there is a lot of cross context between sections, and consumption is not in context for many of the existing articles and in some cases would make them overly long. Some of the content could do with a grammar groom but it is pretty good otherwise IMO. / (talk) +April 2008 (UTC) As you can see, Ms Crisp appears to follow me everywhere I go, even after many weeks of my forbearing to edit at all. Does she want me to desist utterly from contributing to the Wikipedia project? Possibly you could investigate Ms Crisp's stalking behaviour. It is beyond creepy and surely cannot be healthy. 09:33, 28 +" Two things: First, tell me exactly where you have your mail delivered to if you live in ""Short Pump"". Second, you're an idiot." +I've had enough of this Kafka-esque argument now. I made a really simple edit, which was to remove a redundant piece of text which misused copyrighted material, and apparently two or more editors are now content to chunter on without end about it. Kindly get over it and move on. I'll remove any further discussion here. Put it on the article talk page if you think you have some kind of point. 201.215.252.50 +Wouldn't a bee's stinger also be an excellent example of a suicide weapon?-Joe +importance Can't think it's a high importance Derbyshire article, I doubt it's even a mid one. Never went there in several years of walking in Derbyshire and environs. Axe Edge however, that's another matter -) Bob aka +Thanks for yet more info. I think that we should probably start a new article, Ceylonese pound, to encompass the issues of the Treasury and the private banks. I now have a catalogue that lists the private issues but I don't know what was issued by the Treasury. +Go ahead and shorten the footnotes as long as they do not lose their value. I personally have added a lot of references but did not bother to format them, or to shorten them. +I'm not aware of any articles I've requested review for creation. +why why are you gonna block me +HEHE OH I AM VERY OFFENDED' LMAO YOUR JUST A HOMOSEXUAL BLOW JOBBIN OLD LADY! +I HATE YOU LISTEN YOU MOTHERFUCKER, STAY OUT OF MY WAY, DONT TELL ME IM VANDALISING STUFF OR ILL COME AND VANDALISE YOU UGLY FACE. ILL COME FIND YOU AND MUSHHHHHHHHH YOU FAT ASS UP!!!!! and thanks for showing me the sandbox. MUGAMBO +" deleted part . - - Amy, welcome to Wikipedia. I just wanted to offer you a tip a user a few minutes ago typed some random letters to create an article called ""retail bank"". You erased those letters. I just wanted to thank you for being attentive and catching that blanking the letters, though, leaves us with a 0 byte article that won't show up as a red link. Normally, if someone creates an article full of gibberish like that (or crude/rude vandalism), it should have the following tag added to it: {{speedy}}. That tags the article for deletion so that an admin can come through and delete it from the database (as I did with retail bank). I just figured I'd let you know for next time, since you're already helping catch that kind of thing. -) Thanks again for keeping an eye out, and welcome to Wikipedia. If I can ever be of any help or answer a question, feel free to drop me a note here. 19:54, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)" +Which Bayard and which Condict is the building named after? By the way, whom is Bayard Street named after? +I think thsi is a gayu website +"==Add a comment here== " +I should be ok now actually as I've found a copy of Tranformation of a Valley which has stuff on the canal. If I'm still short of stuff, I look for something by Hadfield. +I don't care. Strange hinted not in that stupid Diary. It goes in. +" AfD nomination of Loudoun legends Loudoun legends, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Loudoun legends satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loudoun legends and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Loudoun legends during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ♫ " +"= My response to a ""make-up"" reponse=== I affirm that I was banned User: The JPS, but I was also unbanned by him after I made clarification to him. User: Addhoc, let me clear to you humbly, that stick means the same as you will find in the dictionary. As Akhatr Munir Khan Marwat uses 'stick to walk, after he fell from stairs, few weeks before. I am just pointing that stick. Remember, I never wanted to bring up personal issues here, as I mentioned above, but User: Marwatt made it first. User: Addhoc as you are administartor and AMA member, I would like to make a please to kindly resolve the issue of article Marwat that has been a battle-ground for past few months due to an induvidual User: Marwatt who loves to persoanlise the article as he is having Personal enmity with those ""Notable People"" whom I mention always. Sorry for personal attacks, if I launched any, but let me be clear and true, so it would be easy to resolve the issue. ==" +Interesting - thanks for this. Suppose that I, a British gentleman and university graduate (and therefore arguably entitled to the style Esq in the UK), but not a qualified lawyer of any sort, were to visit the US and happen to use the suffix Esq there. Could I be prosecuted for misrepresentation? Do the state bars claim sole right to grant this suffix in the US, or are they just the only organisations which currently do? This is entirely a hypothetical question, by the way - I'm not expecting to visit the US in the near future, and I don't write Esq after my name anyway - I'm just curious as to the exact legal standing of the term in the US. +An event mentioned in this article is an October 7 selected anniversary. - +Congratulation PRODUCER. You linked exactly what shows Direktor's true light. You have shown his true self. He had insisted that Croats were most of the partisans throughout the entire war in croatia. He was livid at me for even questioning that. Well since it was not enough to him that I showed him that his own source was not worded well, I dropped the issue. Clearly we can see that the partizan movement in Croatia was a primarily Serbian movement. The sources show that clearly in 1941, 1942, and 1943 the Partisans in Croatia were indeed a overwhelmingly Serbian group. I got top academic sources that say that. Why do you find that troubling? Why? As for this recent edit, , I have to ask why delete that? Why? Why do you seem to be irritated with factual information? I added the exact scholarly article where Hoare mentions it. I'd upload the picture of it too, I went out of my way to obtain material. I source my stuff, rather than compose biased articles. You totally ruined this article, you removed all that juicy information that I put in. These actions from you are not okay. ( ). +There is a good tutorial on talk pages here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial_(Talk_pages) +Thank you! That's very kind of you. ) (talk) +" I would have guessed that it was Canadiandy who would be complaining here; take a look at his edit history: how many actual contributions to articles has he made ? ) His bit here smacks of 'admin shopping' to help his 'cause'. Cheers | Talk " +The name Tajik no more implies a lack of connection with Persian than the name Cockney implies a lack of connection to English. - 17:52, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) +"""Jeshua"" is not the same name as ""Jesus"", why exactly are they spelled differently in English then? Why aren't they both either ""Jeshua"" or ""Jesus"". Unless your claiming they are different but the same at the exact same time!! " +The accepted view today is that urochordates are closer to vertebrates and lancelets farer away. This is supported by papers in the most prestigious journals. See Blair and Hedges 2005, Delsuc et al 2006, Vienne and Pontarotti 2006 and Bourlat et al 2006 +Oxford Seasons I got the info from the 'A Complete Record 1893-1989' book. +Nice going Guess you figured you didn't have enough enemies, well now you've just made one more... nice going... You'll never be able to keep me out, now you're going to have your hands full. Nice going. 71.127.135.231 +Fell I thin he fell for it! He will fall into the colective's hands! +showing validness of inclusion not applicable to vandalism +If you don't have time to learn and abide by the documented policies and guidelines of Wikipedia (to which both NeilN and I have directed you, thus disproving your assertion concerning our egos), and to do so collaboratively with other editors, you should not be editing Wikipedia articles. I strongly recommend you invest your energies elsewhere, perhaps in writing a book about Mr. Ragu, where you would not find yourself subject to these policies. +Sorry, really mean it now Go fuck yourself FAGGOT. I didn't want to play this card but you made me biatch. +Arguing that BART and Caltrain should get more money by virtue of the fact that they are rail systems may be arguing against cost-effectiveness, but it's still a valid argument. Cost-effectiveness is not the be-all, end-all. BART and AC Transit serve different functions, and their funding levels reflect that. No bus service could take the place of BART, so it seems foolish to hold them up to the same funding standards. That's all I meant. +martyn lowery. Author or OUR LOVE NOW. Dates unknown. Birthplace and background info unknown. +" Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Adoration of the Magi (Fra Angelico and Filippo Lippi) Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Fra Angelico, Fra Filippo Lippi, The Adoration of the Magi.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. The Homunculus " +Personal Attacks Please refrain from making personal attacks on other editors as you did here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Wars:_The_Force_Unleashed_(video_game) Your bickering is not constructive to the Wikipedia project. Also, it should be pointed out to you, that the word 'knew', is the past tense of the word 'know'. When something is fresh, innovative, novel, original and the opposite of old, it is 'new', not 'knew'. +" To the anonymous editor who keeps putting ""social democratic"" in as the ideology. Please read the website. You will see that it is a ""broad front"" type of organization that includes the groups that I've listed in the article. It includes social democrats, as well as socialists, communists, and others from the left. it calls itself ""progressive"" and not ""social democratic"". Unles you can provide evidence that the UFP calls itself ""social democratic"", stop making changes that you cannot back up. Thank you. 14:02, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)" +The steep nose dive in Obama's job approval ratings is notable. It has declined from 70% to 48% in Obama's first 10 months according to Gallup, a very reliable polling group, and has been confirmed in several other polls. This is faster than any other president in recent history. I believe it is notable enough to mention in his biography. Judging from the number of Google News hits, it's very notable. +This IP address, 149.254.192.195, is registered to T-Mobile UK, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers +I do not edit or view articles in some specific order. When I see obvious POV-pushing I obviously try to correct. My motivations don't matter ultimately. What matters is NPOV which you ignore. +Support Islam Hello, I support the rape of Swedish women, too. +" My RfA Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust it me, and I will be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. Happy editing! – Tropical Cyclone " +And it would be better if you could restore it. +The following entry was recently placed under Usage in films, popular culture, and advertising: Ninja Movie Used it as the end soundtrack. It was very famous for being used their Ninja Movie doesn't link anywhere. Not sure which Ninja movie this refers to. Perhaps Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (film), but there are two sequels, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III. There are also other Ninja films since it is also a whole film genre. Please clarify which movie included Don't Worry Be Happy in the end credits and then replace. Thanks. Talk +Clearly notable, no need to merge. +" Hey PBS. Adding to this line of thought. Would you call WWII German occupied Czechislovakia an ""occupied territory""? How about when the Russians moved in? Was it an ""occupied territory"" then? To me, the current definition of ""occupied territory"" doesn't usually apply to whole countries. " +I'll remember that. +In which category is it the tallest? +Text removal Hi there! I just saw your message about the Columbia article. To tell you the truth, I don't remember exactly why I removed the text given that it was a year ago. However, I think the part about tears streaming down Cain's cheeks is certainly not encyclopedicit's trivia that's not really relevant to the article. As for locking the doors, I'm not sure what point you were trying to make there, but it is standard procedure for a crisis in Mission Control. Hope that helps. If not, let me know and we can talk further. +"Regarding your edits to Dr. Seuss: Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. talk " +" He is DEAD. The series is over. There's no point in citing Sara's dead. Just because you are acting like a pathetic fan boy and crying because Michael's dead doesn't give you the right to post speculation. The movie makes it clear that he killed himself via electrocution. you are right about the body though it's quite possible that Sara was later exonerated after the escape. She even tells her son ""Let's go visit your father"" so it's possible that his body was later given to Sara and Lincoln." +" My Stories! Hi! You might want to read my new online series of books, titled ""Stuffed Animal Stories""! All of the stories were written by me, and I'm sure you will love them! If you like them, consider joining the fan club! You can see my whole series or join the fan club Thanks! " +Reverted me and left the talk. Real classy. +I made a massive'' effort to put up with this effective disruption, but unless some kind of miraculous change comes over you and you start cooperating with others in a manner cooresponding with Wikipedia policies... I'm done here +"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. '096'''(block) " +I guess it is more of a common knowledge stereotype. It is not a POV statement. +I would like to contribute to Wikipedia but since my available time is limited, I will only be able to make minor changes, like spelling, grammar, structure, and small amounts of historical and fact based information. I hope that I can be of help here and appreciate any feedback. Thank you. +with my finger up my nose, just messin'! +How can you expect people not to be angry and to be civil when they're work is destroyed? +" ""there's some way to change your sig so it doesn't say your name'' is SOCKPUPPETESQUE, derrrrr. And again, it changes not at all any substantive element of mimsy whomever's bad faith editing. Did you have a point? " +Viz The merge was a disgrace, fuck you people. +Also he is a.w.f.u.l. +" __NOEDITSECTION__ GLB and sometimes T A discussion for another day perhaps? ;) Take Care, Indeed. And good luck, ok? Got your message - ✍ The fight continues! (As long as i am around to keep my CRASS vinyl spinnin' ;) Thank you for adding the info: What you've just done is more than they have accomplished in the last year for us oddly enough since this law passed. Now we have something to point to when we create all our lovely links ;) Total sweetness, thanks again Signed up for the group, got your message ) Thanks much! See you there! Thanks for the link update 8-) I didn't want to post it if people wouldn't like it. Some minor changes to our site i believe make it 'more appealing' to a broader audience as well (Just finished them...) Thanks again for the assist - We appreciate it greatly! I like the changes... Thanks for the assist with that! It was a nice surprise 8-) FYI, Insurance Discrimination was one of the top 3 things we won with HB 2661. I noticed the new page others created and was delighted. I did however make one addition and added insurance. This is a major issue for transgender persons especially everywhere; access to medical care free from discrimination ;) 'Legislative History' and 'Fiscal Notes' external links added today to HB 2661 in regards to the historic legislature which passed here in WA State. This law includes a group of persons with unique needs and issues; Fiscal allocation/requests for support are relevant whereas civil rights law enforcement support is concerned. Just wanted to thank you for your continued efforts with HB 2661! Allie, i wanted to ask for your help with something. I uploaded an image and am not sure how to label it... please view my info page and you will see... I submitted a question to wiki but i know you are smart so i figured i'd ask you too ~ (ps. I love the new pic ;) Fixed the problem! (and thanks ;) ) - ✍ I appreciate the assist with the image tag! I was admittedly stumped. Wiki is all about asking other people for help when you need it too ;) That is what in part, makes it so great to participate in! No problem at all ) Yep - WP is all about co-operation so just dig in and get editing! If you need any help on anything at all, just ask ) - ✍ Hey Just wondering why you like Ireland so much. I live here and I hate it and I plan to emigr8 ASAP! Hiyya. Dunno if you noticed but I emigrated last August (again!). This time, I've no plans on ever living in Ireland again - ✍ Oh Kul! So do u lyk it in California. Hey, do u know if u'd be able 2 rent an appartment in L.A. at the age of 16 there? Thanx You are welcome. I was looking at the pp page, and followed your link. Nice pic. ;) Thank you! ) - ✍ Hey do u have any info that cud help, cos I seem really crazy but it would really mean a lot to me and i would be very grateful if you cud give me any useful info u have. Thanx again! Ali's Pic Your p +It didn't claim a ton of work is being done, only that work is being done. p ¦ +" Suntag's RfA Could you please elaborate on your support? Thanks. — (talk) " +I think making such a product would probably be a lot more complicated than it sounds. As for an article on virtual persons, if you have enough material on them you should start it, I didn't see one on Wikipedia. +Note that the article makes extensive use of the group's terminology and jargon. The Children of God lexicon on xFamily.org may be of some use when reading it. +"userbox-level | level = 5b | id = en | info = This user is able to contribute with a professional level of English. }} '''''' This user ignores all Wikipedia policies and guidelines except Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Lead, and User:Marskell/Think of the Children." +Independents Hi Roisterer - regarding the edit, the reason I reverted it was because it would have been the odd one out of all the electoral districts. Whilst the white colour and a real name already shows that they're an independent, I wouldn't object per se for changing their names to the word Independent, however if you wish to do this please go through all the electorates and do the same thing so there is consistency. And if you do decide to change them from their name to independent, please fill in Independent instead of just Independent. Thanks! +" I thought that bit was the most agreeable part. All kidding aside: People who would lose all respect for someone else based on one outburst deserve no respect themselves in turn (i.e. ""outburst"" doesn't include going on an RL killling spree or the like of course). I'm still that same guy, sometimes full of shit (includes humor), sometimes with some or even much professional attitude. Maybe I needed it. Maybe not. I like to think that I had to get out some things. And since I'm not the least bit interested in joining WR or another of those places, I had to do it here. And instead of doing it latently, I now got all that out of my system in one outburst. You see, when I usually comment e.g. on what I perceive as a bad-faith RfA oppose, I was constantly holding back, trying to stick to the rules (most of the time anyway). But that sticking to the rules is a rotten ""primary directive"", and calling spade spade is even more necessary, because it's simply more accurate. And to do it in the form of an alc-induced (or rather, triggered) outburst affords a good option for everyone to ignore the content of what I said, as opposed to constantly complaining about this editor or that comment. On the other hand: The way things turned out on my initial (very civil, let's not forget that!) posting to AN/I was yet another clear message of how cronyism rules the upper echelons. — Dorftrottel⁠ " +Unblocking me on the condition that I stay away from Female genital mutilation won't interfere with that. +Discussion of the article is irrelevant because you will quote barely relevant wording rules or whatever else to remove anything that contradicts your own racial sentiments. The glaring problem in that opening paragraph has been noticed by several people, and several times you have shot edits down despite them being improvements on the present form. +It depends on what the nominator wishes to do. I am happy to continue reviewing the article after the 25th of January unless the nominator would prefer to put the article up for peer review and then go on to nominate for featured article status. +" User:86.174.240.211 is at it again Hello, I take it you're an admin. You should check my talk page, the guy is at it again with his personal attacks. He left this message, ""I'm a dear friend of ambassador Domecq, all your messages will be sent to the embassy. CODE NAME: AMOR, Greetings to my friends residing in the Philippines."" He's impersonating another professional diplomat. PacificWarrior101" +Banners Word is, some user objects to the Chicago Wikiproject banner? George Morrison is from Evanston, and attended the University of Chicago. In any case, WikiProjects don't have to justify their interest in a topic. I'm adding WP Biography's banner here, as it is appropriate as well. +RE: Well, I wanna tell you something about Wikipedia. I was looking at WP:NOT, and nowhere on that page is the word rumor. +See Talk:Steven Gerrard#Gerrard's Height?. +" ""Comcast User From Houston"" You were clearly trying to personally intimidate me by calling out these details on my talk page. By doing so you violated Section 4 of Wikipedia's Terms of Use. http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#4._Refraining_from_Certain_Activities" +" IPA - what I read the main page of the article on IPA. On the plus side it is clear. On the minus side, it makes no attempt to explain what the IPA is. (context, scope, purpose, etc.) Nice chart. Lots of data (for people who probably have no need of it) but virtually no general information. My questions (which weren't answered - keep in mind I'm a totally lay person): An alphabet is used to 1. Communicate between a writer and a reader (of the same language), 2. Describe that communication (unambigously?) Right? Certain things are implied by its name, but clearly one should define what the subject of the alphabet is (are). I have no idea if it covers all indoeuropean languages not to mention Mandarin Chinese (etc.)? Does it (attempt) to cover all spoken languages? Written? What about non-vocal languages (finger snaps - all that stuff). Sign-language? We now have some evidence that hand gestures are linked to language in the brain...but I digress. From a simplistic point of view language can be thought of as being three distinct (context sensitive) types of communication: written/read, spoken/heard and performed/viewed. I suppose an alphabet can't cover the last (but see how choreographers describe dance) and, obviously, there are non-alphabetical languages (pictographics, heiroglyphic, etc.) just as there are languages which make use of whistles, clicks. SO what does the IPA do? It just occured to me that maybe the IPA is (now-a-days) only used by euro-centric hobbyists and that would explain why there was no attention given to giving a serious explanation of what it is: ""if you have to ask...{then you don't need to know}""" +" So what? She didn't use foul language she still acted like a royal bitch. She isn't queen of wikipedia. ""Get some tea,"" bullshit. And you know what? Your a motherfucker too. You can eat my ass you son of a bitch. You can't go around and talk down to people like she did and expect them to just take it like its nothing. " +Dear Yandman Fuck you, do not censor me, cuntface. I think my point about French people being smelly frogs is very valid, it is not a matter of opinion. You go to hell you dirty bitch. Hugs and kisses Your secret admirer +your comment to me Actually, that was pretty civil. I mean that sincerely and thank you. +" When half the page doesn't show up, it's usually because one of your closing ref tag is missing a ""/"". I've fixed this on two or three pages you've started. This time I didn't notice that there was an incomplete ref tag before the one I fixed, which is why the ref section looked strange. " +AfD nomination of The Original Magazine An article that you have been involved in editing, The Original Magazine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Original Magazine. Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) Trenton, Ontario Thanks for this - really appreciate your help. And again. tidys Thanks for the tidys...much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.85.82 Trenton Ontario Page The page is simply incorrect. However Blotto adrift believes he has an monopoly over it. When several different users correct it he complains to an admin and you block IP address'. Please if you are going to block someone in the future please look into BOTH sides. The trenton ontario page is incorrect and it will stay that way until you stop siding with Blotto Adrift. This is not the only page users have complained about Blotto adrift changing. I am here to help wikipedia by correcting mistakes. This will only improve this sites poor view. However if admins do not look into the actions of all users this site will only go down hill. Blocking based on providing correct information is sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 Who's rush? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 Interesting Greetings. According to your contribution history[1], the only edit you have made before today was to Rush last July. You have never edited Trenton nor any other article to do with places in Canada so what are talking about? Malcolmxl5 (talk) hmmm.... I did last week before I was blocked. anyways I would like the trenton ontario page to be corrected. Please do a search on scholars portal to find the several journal articals by J.Mickelakos.... then Blotto will say how do we know he's from trenton? It is sad that one of the only scholars this town has is not added because of the jealousy a user has when someone corrects his edits Protecting Blotto adrift You will find every way to protect Blotto adrift instead of correcting an error on a page. I am here to help wikipedia and you seem not interested in this. Like I said before, he is sited in many journals. Also scholar portal has over 500 000 journals google less than 1000, so how is he to be sourced? Also please see York's part time professor list in tthe calendar. That's 'cited', not 'sited', by the way. Happy days. I will await your apology – and the apology from others Thank you how about you correct wikipedia, because I can find many typos on your page Notability, Mr. 69.***.**.***, notability. Show me and others that 'Jason Michelakos' meets Wikipedia's criteria of notability. Focus your energies on that. +" ""No where in any of Wiki's policies is the concept of avoiding opinions."" - from WP:NPOV: ""Avoid stating opinions as facts"". In addition, notability is not based upon opinions; it is based upon objective criteria laid out at length in WP:N." +Your (1) is sophistic word games, and your (2) contradicts the introductory paragraphs of the very policy you're trying to cite. I'm not going to discuss this with you further. +" The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for being nice to The Dark Fiddler on the Spore talk page! (t/c) " +Your great map Thank you so much for your excellent Costa Concordia disaster map. There are now some reliable sources on its route and where it ran aground before capsizing, so I made this update request. I hope you or someone else can do it. Cheers! +Explanation for silence To all my associates, friends, enemies etc at WP> You may be wondering why you have not been hearing from me lately. This is beacuse I am currently on a one month (?) block accidentally imposed by Drini. (I think). Ive tried contacting him via this page but with no avail as yet. If any of you would like to see me back in action before the month is up, then you could ask +" Mister ME, it's me. Wikipedia is NOT a competition. That's really interesting. It looks to me aufully like the thing i said to you, don't you think ! Do i have anything to say to you ? My, my, that's scary. Well, i've said it already. Can you take it. ""Further comments withheld as unsuitable for posting anywhere...."" It's getting chilly here. 78.130.205.196 " +You've made me so angry that I've decided to take a Wikibreak for two days. Good bye. +" Harold Godwinson Is there any point in leaving the one sentence you have left undeleted in the ""Legend"" section ? As you say, the question is covered in the ""Death"" section. " +Maybe people should start learning what the hell they're talking about before editting, then. IHS is in no way, shape, or form, a metal band. I don't care what the band themselves say they play. Slipknot says they're metal. Trivium says they're not metalcore. Both of those statements are horribly false. +Ordinarily I would agree that this isn't notable although the rest of the world is watching with interest because the US Scouts continue to discriminate against LGBT people (apparently with support from the US Supreme Court). Finally this is becoming more newsworthy now that some prominent artists have publicly told the Scout Jamboree (whatever a Jamboree is) where to go! talk talk] +Scenario after the second round All scenarios except 5-5-5-0 do not involve a three-way tiebreaker, so I only explain the 5-5-5-0 situation below. If Spain draw with Republic of Ireland and Italy defeat Republic of Ireland, the three teams Spain, Republic of Ireland and Italy will have 5 point each, and 2 points each and 0 goal difference each among the three games among themselves. If the Spain-Republic of Ireland match ends at a draw of 2–2 or higher, Spain and Republic of Ireland will advance due to higher number of goals from games among teams in question. If the draw game is goalless, Italy will advance with a higher number of goals among teams in question while Spain and Republic of Ireland still tie. As reapplying the tiebreaker on the game between Spain and Republic of Ireland doesn't help, Spain will advance (with Italy) with a higher overall goal difference. If the draw is 1–1, the tiebreaker on overall goal difference applies. Therefore, the two teams with the best results against Republic of Ireland advance. +" I never said I ""intend to troll the topic area"", you dishonest nincompoop. I didn't switch from Dimension31. I explained this clearly to AGK in our email exchange, but his blighted intellect was unable to grasp that. " +" Response 1. Photo selection: On 3/15/07, I trimmed his four photos down to what I felt was the most representative one, even though trimming them to zero makes more common sense. What did I do to balance out this trimming? In the external links section, I added a link to Shankbone's gallery in Wiki Commons, which features all four pics. Hence anyone can see all four photos with the click of a button. ""Chivalry is truly not dead,"" you say to yourselves. (I even left the gallery/centered HTML around it, so that it'd be positioned right in the center for all to see, not off to one side.) What does Shankbone then do? He adds his other three photos back, and slyly keeps the link which I had added to his pics at the Commons. His reasoning is that ""One photograph in a gallery looks odd."" He could have simply reverted to the prior version, but he looked over my changes and then only kept the one change that benefited him. He keeps talking about how he wants to compromise and work with other users, but every chance he gets, he puts himself above all other considerations and still refuses to cooperate. Why would he have even made the Commons gallery unless he understood that his photos were not main-article-worthy? He made the Commons gallery in the first place since he correctly reasoned that that was a better location for them. Now he has told me he will do his best to have me blocked from editing this article any further. Back to what I previously brought up about him using this article for careerist purposes. Why did he put his full name in the title of each of the .jpg files he uploaded? (Roll your mouse over the photos, or attempt to download them to your hard drive, if you don't know what I'm talking about.) That's unheard-of. Unless, that is, he wants a lot of people to download them, and have his name conveniently attached in the file name, in case said downloaders ever want to contact the photographer and offer him $ to reprint them... How can he get as many people as possible to download them? By making them as racy as possible, of course. The point is: He could have posted clothed pictures without his name in them. Or racy pictures without his name in them. Or clothed ones with his name in them. None of those possibilities would have raised the serious ethical questions that have been voiced here by multiple users. 2. Slant of article: Tara Subkoff is a professional actress. She designs (or designed, since IOC is apparently defunct) clothes on the side, though actually all she does is modify existing ones with the help of a partner. Her entire varied, and usually quite daring, 13-year film career is reduced to this line of text: ""She has acted in over a dozen movies."" (Technically, that counts as zero descriptive lines of her actual roles or of accolades she has received.) However, one fashion show of hers, which took place over maybe a 2-hour span at most, is represented by around two thirds of the descriptive text in this article. Does that seem right to anyone? I'd like for even one Wikipedia user to lay out for me how this is correct. Someone who had never previously heard of Subkoff would think that the U.S. media had some sort of frenzy over this one show she put on, and that her acting is so subpar as to deserve approximately 0.0 to 0.5 words per film role. (And 100% of the two ""references"" that he hastily added to this article are about this one-time event.) Shankbone has consistently and subtly altered the emphasis of this article towards proving his point of view, at the expense of doing Subkoff's career justice. In science, an experiment is never undertaken with the intent of molding the results towards proving one pre-desired hypothesis. Any scientist who does so is branded as a sham and generally stripped of his tenure/degree/etc. This is known as the scientific method, and has been followed for centuries. Wikipedia was designed to be laid out in a very cold and scientific manner, to dispense nothing other than actual facts about certain objects and entities. It's not an arena for positing one's own spin on objects and entities. If you don't like cold and non-biased data, then Wikipedia isn't the place for you. I often go to entries on my favorite bands/movies/etc. (and I'm even talking about ones that have drastically changed my life, or bands that I like enough to have interviewed them in the past) and delete anything with even the tiniest whiff of favoritism. 3. Style.com link: I went to the style.com link that Shankbone provided. This link simply reinforces my position. What it shows is 36 pictures of this event. The models are topless in 6 of the pictures. The models are fully clothed in 30 of the pictures. Tell me how Shankbone's four topless pics provide an accurate overview of +" Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gold Pure Food Products Inc.. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. —the highway " +We know you working with ISIS.ISIS Is now working with Israel,UK And USA.We will find you and put you in the jail. +. Support. Neither of the sources that appear in the reference section uses diacritics. Nationality should not be the determining factor. This subject is notable for tennis, not for being Australian. So tennis reference works should be consulted. I doubt if this person is mentioned by name in any reference work. But Bud Collins, John Parsons, and the other authoritative tennis authors do not use Eastern European diacritics. +I flubbed the edit summary; what I meant to say was that keep Christgau on-topic, which is the album not the band. His quote is there for critical commentary about the album. My addition is different, because it illustrates how the album is viewed in the band's catalog, in retrospect, whish speaks to legacy. +At the moment the biography is almost exclusively based on one article in Front Page Magazine. I have attempted to balance that out with another article while at the same time maintaining the original content. If the newly added material is being taken out, then all material from Front Page Mag should equally be removed since it equally has a slanted and ideological perspective. +FUCK U BASTARD(TURD) +You're a sick person. Stalking me, obsessed with Kellogg, even removing a national magazine source that revealed his use of steroids for Everest attempt. Internet sociopath. Get help monster. Seeking you to be banned, persistent vandal sociopath. Climbing forum obsesser also. Spend hours a day on forums. Autism/Aspergers? +He did criticize an execution that he witnessed in a letter, but there is nothing to indicate that he ever renounced Castro. (92.13.96.151 ) +Haha, this is pretty funny. Al-Bargit, you deleted my communist box and you were allowed to keep yours. I would love to support you on this, but frankly, you are a victim of what you complain against. I left English Wiki for reasons stated on my userpage. This is a bias community. You will always have people like Kuban on the English wiki who are obsessed with quoting rules to always get the Sysops side, no matter how hypocritical it is. Remember always, History is written by the winners, unfortunately, Chechnya will never have its say of what happened or their side, because they are still under unfortunately Russian control. Anyway, good luck with your retirement of English Wiki, it feels great being able to put time into Icelandic and Chechen wikis, ones who truly stand for neutrality. +" ""read the notice"" As you seem to be such a fan of procedure, perhaps you can tell me where the appropriate place is to complain about your decision to ignore valid criticism of the decisions to not post the arrest of Adams on the front page. I found the Village Pump, but I suspect you are just going to censor that to. I know you probably hoped that I would just forget about this and go away if you shut me down at Wikipedia talk:In the news, but you don't have to be a psychologist to figure out that was probably the worst thing you could have done. Not that I blame you of course, it's not like anyone could expect you to have any particular skills in this department. But I am hoping that at some point I will find someone here who is able to operate with a little more insight into human behaviour, and more importantly, is actually going to give me an honest and thoughtful answer to my queries. Which obviously, I don't consider the response so far to have been, at all. " +I dont see the problem with that article. I felt it was too complicated really, so I simplified a little. +I will not withdraw it. It is not a personal attack; it is an impersonal attack directed at users who try to defeat Wikipedia's consensus-based decision-making process. If it offends you, I ask that you seriously reconsider editing Wikipedia. —aco +Nope there is no Demo available for download but there r gameplay vids which r just as good. +Trimming Ayn Rand's influences Thanks for your support but some guy reverted all my work and I didn't really want to argue with him. I only have a little interest in Rand so it's not really my place. Just recently, someone else came in and trimmed the list again, only he went too far and removed people who were famous and do claim to be influenced by Rand in a big way. For example, LaVey admitted that his entire religion was a rehash of Objectivism, so his name belongs. I haven't decided whether I want to try fixing this but I don't want any more conflict. +CfD Hi. Under the circumstances I think it might be best to simply delete. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_14#Category:Documentaries_of_John_Pilger, thanks, +Reading your nomination, I like your answer to answer about the AIV question, so you did handle it well. +" {|style=""border:2px solid #000000"" | Welcome, Violet nyambura! Hello, Violet nyambura, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style You might also find these policies and guidelines useful: What do we mean if we say that you might have a Conflict of Interest? What do we mean by Neutral Point of View? What sources are counted as reliable? What makes the subject of an article notable? Why was my page deleted? An essay containing a List of bad article ideas I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Getting the articles just right can be tricky - but there are lots of people to ask! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions. By the way, when you are writing on a discussion page (or someone's talk page), it is considered good manners to sign your comment... to do this, just add ~~~~ at the end of your comment. That will put your user name () and the date/time at the end (or you can click on the icon when you are editing. Never sign on an article page - only on a discussion page. {{#if:|{{#if:| I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a company or organisation. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username. Thank you. Please note that an account can only be used by one person. Wikipedia's Username policy says Explicit use of a name or url of a company, group or product as a username is not permitted. Your username should represent you. Accounts that represent an entire group or company are not permitted. It also says here User accounts can only represent individuals. Sharing an account – or the password to an account – with others is not permitted, and doing so will result in the account being blocked. Please also note that changing your account name does not mean that you are not bound by the Conflict of interest guidelines. | I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a company or organisation. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining wh +" IF YOU'RE ALLUDING TO BLOCKING OF MY ACCOUNT. Then I obviously don't want that. BUT IF YOU CAN really DELETE MY ACCOUNT ACCOUNT(like there will be no record of me ever being here). Then I sincerely say, PLEASE delete it. But Mind you, I'm not talking about ""only blocking my page"". I'm talking about whole account deletion which I think not possible for me to do. Maybe you know how to do it. (Talk if you want) " +Exactly, and since RS isnt a federal republic it has no special rights in Bosnia and if RS has special rights then 100 % of Bosnian territory has special rights. RS is just a smaller Bosnian entity territorial integrated into the in independent, internationally recognized state BiH. +Rewrite tag Articles can always use some tweaking but a full rewrite is not required for this well researched article. +"Reception == The reception of this article doesn't seem to take everyone's view into account. I see only positive viewpoints, and it ignores the rest of the WC3 fanbase, especially on East and Europe, where DotA has not completely taken over and there are vast amounts of players (Most of which happen to be less trollish, as becomes evident if one surveys the majority of DotA players with the ""Brain-dead test"" by requiring them to talk coherently. Kinda like /b, isn't it.) who simply detest the game for its rude community that now believes (Completely on west, and to a certain extent on other servers) that attacking new players for the simple fact that they are new, and booting downloaders without consideration or remorse. Non-moderated games are filled with leavers. And now the banlist extends to games other than DotA, where normal players may be banned for abusive reasons (Beating the host, using novel and effective non-cheating strategies, etc). DotA has overrun Battle.Net with a storm of absolute idiots. The intelligent fraction of DotA players does not nearly make up for the fact that now small, promising maps are being shoved aside by DotA (Look at Obsidian Depths. Look at Mana Clash. Look at Advent of the Zenith.) because it isn't to that community's preference. I'm kind of shocked that there aren't more of this kind of stuff on the talk page, but I bet some's gotten deleted before. I'll check, and it better not be gone in a few days. == " +User talk:122.106.69.62|, as you did at User talk:122.106.69.62,}} is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. +" No problem. — • Talk • " +Ch Manzoor Hussain is numberdar of 26/11-L and a honorable personality of District Sahiwal. +I personally don't find so strange the theory about Martians. The people that exist somewhere at the arrival of the settlers can be natives in a relation with them. I don't agree with the use of the term for the articles you enumerated either +" You're welcome to find one and use it. Be bold. " +"==Yo Unlock this page right now== The album is dropping in less than a week now, and there are major errors on this page. First of all, the producers list is right here: http://www.rapbasement.com/eminem/060910-the-producers-of-eminems-recovery-album-are-leaked-view-the-info-here-click-now.html There are major errors on this page pertaining to that list. Then I myself, made an error in putting the Havoc track as ""Here We Go,"" it is infact entitled ""Untitled."" It is also a Hidden Track, not a bonus track. There will be two iTunes bonus tracks that are currently untitled as of yet, you can check them out in the Deluxe Pre-Order of Recovery on iTunes. You also need to unlock this page because the album did get pushed up a day earlier to June 21rst, as someone already stated. So please act immediately. " +" Typo There's a pretty big mistake. In the infobox they call it ""the beautiful game."" Someone must accidentally have used the word ""beautiful"" when they meant ""boring."" Could someone please change this? Thanks. 69.158.141.106 " +HOW DARE YOU.......... HOW DARE YOU DELETE MY ARTICLE! I AM NOT HAPPY, DAVE! +Article Cleanup For my own reference (or anyone else should they happen to feel like taking a stab at it): This was a version from early '08 which was very stub-like: concise, but not very informative. This is the first version where it was rearranged topically. The catch is that all of the topical information is still historical. The article should be examined from a modern perspective and revised under Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline. Take a look at examples from Category:FA-Class WikiProject Cities articles (or even the recently delisted New York City). +We already won, in 1945. The truth is one, and there are to many people that know it, so DLX could not change it. By the way, about the Sandstein or whatever who blocked us, i knew that would happen. He's a German, so i expected it. He didn't say anything to DLX about what he does. M.V.E.i. +" I see Well, now it makes more sence of clearness. By the way, who is that person who created this article. I remember you said that he was ""thankfully blocked"". What did he do before? " +Congrats... ...on the second most highly supported RFA to date (and also, I'm going to guess, the most highly opposed successful RFA). Now you just have to wait for the b'crats to wake up (and people keep saying we don't need more bureaucrats!) +In response; No exactly not; The V88 clades in the sub-Saharan Chadic speaking Areas came (directly) from North Africa (ultimately) from Eurasia (P25 being the ancestral clade); M18 which is a clade of V88 +" It seems to me that the facticity of the statement is not being questioned, only the publication making the statement and the political slant (""corporate media""). It would be easy to represent the material in an attributed manner. As far as I'm concerned, it is a noteworthy aspect of this event that it was not covered by the larger media outlets. If there is doubt regarding the power of corporate advertising money to influence the media, there are many studies available examining that phenomena, and it doesn't delve into conspiracy theory. 連絡 見学/迷惑 " +" The Indie (music) article isn't about a genre. It's about the concept of ""indie"" in music. What most people consider indie music is better known as some form of alternative rock such as indie rock. " +MR laws is a homosexual +(I wanted to counter the lie in that discussion that no one supported my edits though for example User:Sabahudin9 specifically stated that all my edits were properly sourced) +First i am not Pakistani and i am not Mentally Deranged or is being payed by his government. like you biased and racist Indians. oh i almost forgot su-30mki has 14 hard points ,can carry more weight, has more engines, has more thrust and more range , makes me wonder how many hardpoints and weapons load can be loaded on an Antonov An-225 ,and since bigger plane in the air is so much better , why the HAL has been trying to make the tejas (mirage 2000 copy) for the last 30 (since 1983) years and with a programme cost of almost 3 billion dollars and counting, but still without a decent engine (F414-GE-INS6 being imported). Its time you Indians wakeup to reality and accept that there are others in this world who have better things than you and who play better cricket (Sachin Tendulkar can be out the very first ball) than you and are much better people than you INDIANS. Kindly keep your prejudice to you self and leave wikipedia out , and stop making these racist remarks with your agenda. +WOULD ANYBODY HERE LIKE TO GUESS WHAT I STUCK UP MY BUTT TODAY?!?! +WIDR'S P3N15 TWO WORDS SMALL AS F*** +Arbitration Hey Barney, since I cannot apparently edit Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case (despite being named as a party) would you mind posting my statement for me? It can be found here. Thanks. 76.107.171.90 +here]. He basically took four shots at me to get me banned and used the same 'evidence' four separate times in an attempt to blanket as many Admin's as possible to get the results he wanted. I believe that in light of his hounding, baiting, and badgering me as well as reporting me for the same thing four times, some leniency is due. I admit to using foul language and being kurt and deliberate in my conversations and agree not to speak with this editor again, however he is now badgering other editors on the same article as well as removing legitemate sources I added prior to my ban. I would like to approach that civilly and argue my case. Thank you.}} +Limiting editing to registered users? In the last day there were at least 5 edits by unregistered users that were reverted due to vandalism. Is it possible to do something? +Keely broke her ankle and was forced to leave , she didn't walk +That's unquestionably unfair. I've seen loads of screenshots on other peoples' Wikipedia profiles. Oh wait, they're white, she's black....( +"::::::I disagree - or rather, the consensus among Wikipedia editors seems to disagree. In looking through the noticeboards, I definitely get the sense that television documentaries, with few exceptions, are considered on par with opinion pieces. In this case, however, the point may be moot - the source is in German, and difficult to verify anyways, and the claims being made are, in many cases, exceptional, which requires more, better reliable sources than just a documentary anyways. Any claims made in the documentary, if notable, can surely be cited to other, more reliable sources. If not, I'd have to ask why. ←  talk " +Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Meditation Leaders :Category:Meditation Leaders, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. +" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (79.183.14.117) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! " +Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor Fixed one of your requests on the article, also commented to the rest. Would like to here from you. Thanks, +Screenshots of this page have already been taken so deleting it will not assist your defence +I wish to issue a sincere apology for what seemed like a legal threat to staff at wiklepdia. That was not my intention at all. I was contacting the Police, about my own local security and nothing more. I am sorry for the mix-up and please remove the edit block. Thanks Merle merlet@shaw.ca +Khazars 6 million Khazars has adopted Judaism in ancient times and this was the main contriburing factor of increasing Jew population in the world. Theres no referance in the main article. +Stop reverting me You little faggot 94.1.77.132 +If you find it, let's change it. I love red links. In List of composers by name, people with an article in any WP are accepted (after a discussion). In a list with alumni, I like to read what they mainly do later in life, for example. +Thanks for your kind words. Yes, I've noticed you're doing an incredible job running the spanish dinosaur wikiproject which is growing very quickly as I can see! Congratulations for all you hard work there. You want to be an astronaut? I thought you'd prefer becoming a paleontologist with all these new fascinating dinosaurs being discovered in South America! ;-) Cheers. +Earlier I somehow got a link to the offences referred to, and it would appear that 83.138.136.90 is someone and somewhere else altogether, who has done edits unrecognisable to me. +"Thank you all very much for your input. I've thought about this a long time and I do still think its premature. I take onboard some of the points made here and elsewhere and agree that maybe a full year as an admin isn't strictly necessary - however I still believe that a few more months of experience before asking the community to extend their trust of me is a good idea. Also, the present crats have everything more than under control and there are plenty of other things for me to be doing. I certainly won't let thing go undone however and would consider running whenever backlogs started to mount again. Otherwise, perhaps this is a matter we could revisit towards then end of this year, or start of next... Thanks especially to U.S.A. for a kindly written nomination. scribe " +Why not? According to this guideline, it's okay to start with 3. Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings. With the blatant vandalism that Maypigeon was referencing, it seems appropriate. +" Microformats I've now added hCalendar and hCard microformat mark-up. The former can be mapped to a ""timeline"" suing the new external link. The latter include the location and a ""note"" for the route crossing the river. The ""name"" parameters in are now redundant; and generating duplicate hCards. (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits " +Question Do you know of any reason to believe this guy is more likely to be posting to my talk page than this guy? Thank for any info. +" (not signed) The widely used and agreed format is that for any organization listing particularly notable alumni, members, ect. in the article is OK; however, simply listing people for the sake of listing them dosen't add any meaningful content to the article as, unless the person is notable, then why would anyone else care about it. Wikipedia is not a directly for simply listing information. ""Notable"" is quite universally agreed to mean that the individual is important enough to have their own entry in Wikipedia. So if the person isn't important enough to independently warrant their own biographical page then it's simply irrelevent to list their name in the article as having once been associated with an organization. In regards to the above comment attempting to establish 'notability': Being mentioned in a local student run newspaper hardly counts, in its own right, as credible evidence for establishing that someone is notable enough for the rest of the world to know, or even care, who they are. There is some precedent for establishing a chronological 'list' catagory, separate from the article itself, for long established offices or other leadership positions when that list would contain a number of notable indivduals (see above) with links to their biograpical articiles. In such cases, there isn't much harm in filling in the list with 'non-notable' individuals for the sake of continuity. However, in this case as this is still a very new organization and none of the names are, yet, notable it dosen't really make much sense nor does it add any meaningful content. Perhaps is 30 years when, potentially, some former Berry leaders have gone on to notable careers such a list would be justified, but at the moment it would essentially just consitute pointless self promotion (citing the above previous concerns that this article appears to have been mostly written by those directly associated with the topic of the article). (R)" +I also feel that the DATE that each *registy* was actually incorporated should be listed!! Otherwise *anyone* could *claim* to have a *registry* just by tossing around a few initials, and putting up a quick web page!! If the ISSR folks chose to do this, each breeder just start *their own* registry, would you include all of those too?? Do you realize that you could end up with over 100 such bogus initials (YES, THAT PUT UP A WEB PAGE!!) LOL Hey, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander .. don't you think? How far are you willing to take this?? +Its a good compromise, but the rule that forces us to use the most common name does not give us that option. +They clearly demonstrate the fear and paranoia that would fit the description of someone that would wear a tin foil hat. If someone were doing a research paper on tin foil hats and they needed additional research then Alex Jones about would be a good example. +YOu are one sick individual. The amount of lies you tell... wow... I am speechless. May God have Mercy on your soul. +Why the hell doesn't this article have any content? It should probably be nominated for deletion if no one is going to fix it. +Try starting with apps or games (there were some good sames for the nintendo DS I remember!), that way it's interactive and you're constantly being pushed. Probably stay away from flash card-style ones at the very beginning. +" Deleted Material & Kripalu P.R. Staff Sadly one editor insists on deleting five sentences, neutrally factual & sourced to Mass. Dept. of Environmental Protection, the federal EPA, and the New York Times. This same editor makes unsupportable accusations of ""Conflict of Interest."" Interesting/ironic that Kripalu article was also somewhat recently edited by a Kripalu executive, who similarly objected to well-sourced & neutral material from IRS documents. So, the Kripalu P.R. people are apparently watching. Here are the deleted five sentences: The state had reported in 2003 that this subsurface [public drinking water] system was subject to a ""high threat"" of contamination from possible pesticide overuse or potential fuel spills.[9] The federal Environmental Protetion Agency listed nine reporting and monitoring violations for that same system between 1998 and 2001.[10]A 2008 report said Kripalu's well-based water-supply system contained one form of uranium and two forms of radium, in amounts below legal limits, but above federal health guidelines.[11][12][13]In 2007, the state set an August 2009 deadline for retirement of one of Kripalu's wells, due to health hazards exacerbated by a construction project in the area of the well.[14][15] ''' Removing neutrally presented factual & relevant material is, of course, harmful to the interests of Wikipedia readers. (to be edited). Calamitybrook, you might read some of the many, many responses made over time about these issues. You might consider wp:dispute resolution or wp:RfC to gather support for your position. However, your abusive behaviour is not likely to draw much in the way of help: see again, guidance on your talk page, this talk page, wp:COIN, wp:WQA. Please follow it.- Sinneed " +Colective owns this page +Should I order them by date or alphabetically by title? I've just been adding them as they find them. +and/or church identities +, always a total asshole +" Breaking Away ""Natasha Vita-More presented the 1980 experimental film Breaking Away at the EZTV Media venue frequented by transhumanists and other futurists."" A phrase should be inserted about the theme of this film, lest readers think it's the one about bicycling Indiana teenagers. Good point. From the Transhumanist Arts FAQ: The first Transhumanist Arts piece was made into a high 8 mm film. Performance Art "" Breaking Away"" which storyline themes human evolution in breaking away from our biological restraints and breaking away from earth's gravity as we head into space. The performance art piece was written and performed by Natasha Vita-More at Red Rocks Amphitheater and sponsored by the University of Colorado Film Department. Don Yannacito, Director of Film Studies Program for independent filmmakers, filmed the performance. Come to think of it, someone should make a new Breaking Away about cyclists on steroids and EPO. Bring the two themes together. " +" Political question? I not sure if this is ""political;"" and in fact, I'm hoping it is not .... At WP:AN/I, you suggested a ""fresh start"" in the context of a discussion I have not followed. My interest is only in that term where did it come from? This term does not appear to be associated with any Wikipedia conventions. Fresh start (an anti-Maastricht Treaty group within the British Conservative Party opposed to the Maastricht Treaty) and Fresh Start (detergent) (a Colgate-Palmolive laundry product) are unrelated. If it's just a term you've introduced in this unique setting and nowhere else, fine. I just wondered. I attempted to use a similar concept in a military-related setting at Talk:Hyūga helicopter destroyer#RESET, but it fell on deaf ears. In retrospect, it seems likely that it would have made no difference if there had been a pre-existing link to Reset (military term); but perhaps it may make a difference in future. The political question has to do with this military term. How do ""depoliticize"" the article I'm about to create. It seems likely that there may be numbers of editors and users for whom American military terminology becomes a priori political before it's even possible to reach the content threshold which implies something like your ""fresh start?"" As a general rule, most of the new Wikipedia articles I've created have to do with pre-Meiji Japan, and this odd, overly-sensitive hesitation simply doesn't arise. However, I'm not unaware of those critical voices on the francophone internet decrying the American bias in the World Wide Web; and I've noticed similar comments across a range of English-language Wikipedia articles. Other than searching for British and Commonwealth military specialists in an effort to discover a congruent British and commonwealth term, can you think of something off-hand which might be relevant in creating an article which would have broader usefulness in Wikipedia contexts like you yourself created? A further point: I really like the term ""fresh start"" not as much as ""reset"". Can you foresee any reason why I shouldn't re-name the article about the British activists in the 80's as Fresh Start (British politics). This would leave something like ""your"" fresh start in the primary position. Final question: When I noticed your sub-heading, my first-blush plan was to create ""Fresh start"" as a re-direct page; but now that I think about it, maybe the perceived ""political"" problems with an article about an American military term would be diminished if the article itself were entitled ""Fresh start"" with ""Reset"" as a re-direct page? Do you have any thoughts to share on this unanticipated subject? " +"== Weedism == A tag has been placed on Weedism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" Sockpuppet? I have filed a requests for checkuser on you as a sock over at WP:RFCU. (You can use this if it's not there). " +Dude, seriously, cut it out. He left me a comment, not a warning. I am now reporting you, as you've been overly warned. Do not bother me anymore or I will also press charges that you are harrassing, threatening and cyber-bullying me. I mean it, I am a police officer. +The goddess is defined by Abraham??? ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? There are any multitude of things that amuse me about wikipedia these days, but the concept that the GODDESS is defined in ABHRAMIDIC terms is just so completely rediculous as to make me giggle. Could we PLEASE get some definitions of goddess here that DON't reference the boring staid religions of antiquity? Thank you. +Unspecified source for Image:Brenda_Song,_Raven_Symone,_&_Ashley_Tisdale_in_The_Suite_Life_Goes_Hollywood.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Brenda_Song,_Raven_Symone,_&_Ashley_Tisdale_in_The_Suite_Life_Goes_Hollywood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk +" I unblocked you, but deleted your userpage for the old account ""Strand of Silk"". I highly, HIGHLY recommend that you not upload anything like that again. Since you have done other, beneficial edits, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt. HOWEVER, if you upload anything like that onto any page again, you will be blocked as a spammer. You've already been warned once about spamming. Spamming on userpages is not tolerated any more than spamming on any other page would be. (｡◕‿◕｡) " +Are you arguing that BOLD means there is no need for a consensus? +and congratulations on your re-election +REDIRECT Talk:List of unsolved deaths +The Game's fourth album. The west coast rapper has contradictorily stated that he would make a fourth album titled D.O.C.: Diary of Compton, if he could work with desired artists. http://www.knowhiphop.com/the-game-puts-rap-down-and-might-be-a-fourth-album/article/500.htm +I'm sorry you were born a yank, that isn't my fault but I hear Suicide is a sure fire cure ) please try it and get back to me94.172.127.37 +plz respond plz respond to my question ( ) +You broke the rule also. You have also broke the 3 revert rule so i could easly report you. So dont not try to threaten me. +This is the official Raptors 2012-2013 roster from the raptors website you will note valanciunas' listed height and weight. http://www.nba.com/raptors/roster/2012 I hope this matter has been resolved. +" Jasper Deng is faster than me... The same question. cat " +Itsmejudith, if you know any modern source I can look up to find the similar statements, please let me know. I'll get the book from library and replace the quote myself. I don't want to 'sneak' something into the article, I swear by God. Jewish Encyclopedia does have POV. Making connection between 'how one group of people treat the others' and 'their ancestors' are made in Bible (not by me). It might seem strange, but that's how Bible views things (forgive me if I'm wrong). Now, I found it interesting to include this POV into the article (i.e. this connection between Muslims and Jews). Mainmoinds refers to Muslims as Ishmaelies (if I am correct). Itsmejudith, I've been subject to a harsh block for reasons which I still don't know. I was accused of all kinds of imaginable crimes in wikipedia, ranging from nationalism bigotry related crimes to harrassment, disruption and personal attacks + several kinds of humuliations and getting ignored from the blocking admin on the top of it. I am exhausted; it is up to you guys... Decide whatever you wish for this section and act upon it. +I didn't want this to turn into a debate on whether America is an Empire or not. Its just that it should be in its own disputed section. An Empire is a faction which expands through conquest, forcibly places the conquered people under its command and forces the subsequent nation to submit. Technically though America did expand through conquest, the areas which it conquered were admitted as states into its union through democracy. Empires do nothing of the sort. They force the subsequent nation into its empire, no democracy involved. While Oklahoma may become the State of Oklahoma, say if it was conquered by Spain again, it would simply be territory of the Spanish Empire. (82.28.237.200 ) +HELLO FRIENDS THIS IS PARMOD NOHRIA. I AM FROM DHARAMKOT(MOGA). I AM FRANKLY STRAIGHT GUY. +Tiger Woods likes Seb az86556's unicorns +I appreciate you leaving a welcome message on my talk page..LOL However, I can assure you I am not new to Wikipedia! I will not get into a reverting war about this, however, I will go through the article and remove everything that is not sourced. Thank you for bringing this to my attention! +The work of my friend who started it? What a jack ass you are. +Lucky Mr. Lucky the names bond james bond cool it what are you my parent? You have done enough I was playing you all the whole time. Love ya Oh and the sockpuppets riverofdreams cursa godbless +" Temperatures Rising Hi. Thank you so much for your support of the Temperatures Rising article and coming to my ""defense"" against the opposition by Nikkimaria and Graham Beards. I'm quite annoyed by them because their criticism (in my opinion) is done in such a condescending manner and only makes vague references to what needs to be corrected (i.e. ""it needs copy-editing""). Your comments are much more supportive and constructive and for that I am extremely grateful. I may not get the article to FA status but I've done my best. Thanks again for the help. " +Um its like totally my RIGHT as a free human being (i do not liv in israel or palestin) to voice my OPINION even if it disagrees with yours. god, u shud have learned this stuff in kindergarten. i wasn't trying to mess up your article or this mess of a convo. so go bak to pretending to be sage and watever and ignore a fresh new outlook (MINE) for all u know i cud have brought peace to this page. now you'l never know. +In order to correct the grammatic mistakes one needs to understand the whole meaning or the context of the section. Wouldn't it be nice to have a shorter essay but at least readable or undertandable then a long paranoia where everybody can wrtie whatever comes to his mind. The section about so called Democratic Republic of Armenia is written by a person who writes his own thoughts or his conversation with a friend. Who is going to correct this bazaar conversation. It just needs to be removed. +I applaud you Good job fighting these muslims who would lie to the end of the earth about their own religion and their own political agendas. I personally have been rv'd for simply putting a npov tag on pages dealing with Islam. Wikipedia is good for things like looking up Julius Caesars life, but dealing with any geopolitical articles you need to be careful because the liars are all around. +" Just for the record this is not a ""G4"" candidate, because the previous AFD turned on the lack of sourcing, which is now no longer an issue. –xenotalk " +stick your warning up your arse you fucking gaywad. how about you read WP:GAME and fuck off somewhere else +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wonder Girls. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +I think that i understood what I am blocked for, I will not do it again.I promise I will not offend anymore!!!!!! +WHO ARE YOU FUCKING CUNT HEADS TO TELL ME THAT I AM NOT WELCOME HERE? GO FUCKING DIE, TWICE. YOU CUNTS ALL DESERVE GASSING +", 24 November 2008 (UTC) ""Oversights took place"" is far different than describing what the removed edits actually said, or why they were removed. In any case, I suspect that since you have been blocked indefinitely by thebainer you won't be returning to this conversation. I tried to warn you before that happened... T 22:20" +Simple request Stop trying to get the Bukkake page deleted on grounds that bear no relevance to the actual page in question. Furthermore, once the deletion tag has been removed, it should not be re-applied, thus why you did so is beyond me. +Um, I've read the supposed sources and they do not say what it is claimed they say. Citing a source that does not say what it is claimed they say is wrong. Removing material that is unsupported by reliable sources is right. Support doing right things. Stop supporting wrong thongs. +Machu Picchu Hiya, just as a second opinion from another admin, I wouldn't call the actions of vandalism (see WP:VANDAL#NOT). I do agree that the block was appropriate since they were edit-warring and not responding to talkpage messages, but I didn't see anything from the IP that looked like a deliberate attempt to compromise the encyclopedia. Ditto with the protection notice at Machu Picchu. Protection was appropriate, but it might be better to change the reason to edit-warring, rather than for vandalism. Would you have any objection to my changing the message? onka +" Elon refers to BFTS as Big FALCON Test Stand in this recent interview at nasaspaceflight.com http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5237 So we should all just forget the sordid past of F. LOL. SpaceX is a great company and we can best support them by putting this behind us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Please do not remove other discussion threads when making your contribution to the discussion. I've restored the previous threads and moved your addition ot the bottom. Also, plesae sign your posts so people will know who said what in the discussion. Hey, ""stuff of interest"" F is for Falcon now. I am cleaning up all the talk of when F is for *** because it is just a bunch of profanity from the past and is no longer needed. Your profile shows an interest in Bigelow and the DC-X. If you are a new / alt space guy I assume you want SpaceX to succeed. Let us all help them by keeping their image profanity clean. - I have reverted this as it is vandalism. If you continue to remove other people's comments, you risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. GW_Simulations | Talk You guys are concerned about my ""vandalism"" of your deep ananysis of the F bomb usage? Let me paint a little picture for you. If you want to see launch costs go down and humanity colonize Mars before our society declines into the next dark age I think this may concern you even more than my ""vandalising"" your coverage of profane language. It is the summer of 2009. The decision to continue COTS funding comes accross President Clinton's desk. She passes it off to some staffer who happens to be a man hating feminist. For starters this lady views rockets as phallic shaped symbols of male power with flames coming out one end. A lot of people read wikipedia and your embarrasing discussion is only one click away from the main article. She soon learns from the bold headlines that these are not just rockets, they are Big FUCKING Rockets. Big FUCKING Phallace shaped flame shooting rockets made by a male dominated industry. She makes her recomendation to Clinton and Bye Bye COTS funding. Now is that what anyone hear wants. Why don't you guys go ask your wives if they think the wrong kind of woman might be offended by this. Elon is now calling it the Big FALCON Rocket and I suggest we go along with this and clean up the discussion. I don't want to have to wast my time deleting this over and over but I will under differnet IP address if I have to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) So, you now say you will conduct trolling? Thank you for the preadmission, it will make justifying quick blocks of your addresses much easier. The official SpaceX definition of their acronyms BFTS and BFR is covered in the above discussion sections. This section adds no value and should be removed. Which I have reverted. It is vandalism to remove other people's posts. GW_Simulations | Talk The other posts were aparently from one anonymous poster. They can add a signed comment to the above apropriate section if they wish. The posts still show how they feel about this topic. Their techniques may not be desirable but you are no better than them as you are using the same methods - vandalism - to suppress other people's comments. I've given you both final warnings, and if either of you vandalise this page again, then I will request a block. GW_Simulations | Talk Elon refe +" Talkback Sorry for a long response, but I promise it's worth a reaad. — (Je vous invite à me parler) " +" Charles Baudelaire -> HPL Charles Baudelaire currently says ""Baudelaire was also an influence on H. P. Lovecraft, serving as a model for Lovecraft's decadent and evil characters in both ""The Hound"" and ""Hypnos""."" I'm skeptical. Does anybody have anything for or against this? 201.37.229.117 " +hi. please leave us a message. i think we created an article about us in the context of long island before but maybe it was deleted because it seemed like spam? can you just like, let us know before you do that? we are trying to help out. thanks. -sean at kempleton do t c o m +Okay, I admit that Lans and Derks may not have written in clear contradiction to what Downton wrote in this respect, but the strong wording by Derks and Van der Lans (accepting Guru Maharaji as a personal saviour) is quite different from Downton. +Fucking niggers thanks for wasting my time here,I'll just go back to vandalizing this shithole +Please add what you may know of Del Zamora, and visit the searchers2.com site ) many thanks. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Little Orphan Annie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +September 2008 Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): OK Request handled by: " +Warsawa Photos Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/ +I was busy adding to the article when you chose to interfere - perhaps I should have placed an (in use) tag to avoid that. The images are informative and if you spend a minute or so verifying it, you'll find that they ARE images of Guinusia chabrus = Plagusia chabrus. They obviously ARE an expansion even if they do not meet with your expectations, and have not been 'plastered' as you so snidely observe. That you personally find them unacceptable grieves me greatly. I would remind you of the ownership caveat that exists on WP. +" Those aren't personal attacks. I'm just practicing editing for when I become a model contributer to Wikipedia. And who cares if I add ""copyrighted info"" on my talk page? Who's going to even read it? Like there isn't copyrighted material all over the rest of the site? " +Looks like CJ DUB is still obsessed with me. Look at him... he writes a LONG list of things he THINKS I stated. He's been blocked twice and still hasn't learned his lesson. Now watch this everyone. He's going to report me to the FBI on grounds that I insulted him. I feel sorry for him. +" BARBARO I left some comments on F550's talk page. I think how Wikipedia has treated this F550 and the Barbaro family was unfair. I also noticed that this individual seems to have just tried to edit his name out of those two bogus societies, which seems fair to me, and Wikipedia editors keeps bringing it back. It seems like Wikipedia's disregard for others is very cruel. just my thoughts I also left some comments too on genio or ganios talk page too Excuse me Gustav, your contribution with adding San Francesco della Vigna was actually not correct. I left a comment for you on Giano's talk page. I think everyone is desperately trying to piece inconsequential tid-bit in hope that something resembling an article might show up. The original version I saw a month ago was just fine and accurate. Gustav, I just had a chance to look at the history of the Barbaro family page. Why was the article listed as the ""TRUE BARBARO FAMILY ARTICILE..."" removed. That is the one that should be the official Barbaro family page. It has excellent Zorzi sources and clearly is structured in a not only a factual way, but also a way that captures the true spirit and soul of the family. This aricle that you have replaced it with is crummy. Why isn't this page flagged ""under construction"". You gotta be kidding me if this is the official article that is constructed for the great Barbaro family. Please say it isn't so. This has got to be the worst article I have ever seen on Wikipedia. This thing stinks! Usually articles this dinky are flagged as stubs asking for people to expand on them. I think it is time to admit Gustav that you are out of your league. Clearly the person that constructed the former Barbaro family article was an Art Historian that new this family and proper sources well. HYPER-INDIVIDUALIST@YAHOO.COM IS IN ON THE HOAX! This hyper guy is in on it with Tiki-two. They planned to damage the Barbaro family page all long. First they started bogus societies which they knew would lead to the family page being destroyed. They planned it well. Tiki used the same company computer which would discredit the family's input and this hyper guy stayed out from editing so he would seem clean. But how come the conversation on the secret society talk page is only between Tiki and Hyper. Even his tag looks suspicious, ""Hyper-individualist"". Watch this guy very closely. I think the Barbaro family needs an I'm sorry. Because I noticed that whenever it seems like the Barbaro page was going to be restored, than all of a sudden Hyper jumped in with Hoax Hoax! Very sneaky and well timed Hyper. I see what is going on. How can anyone discredit all of the evidence that was given in supportfor the family. I get you Hyper. You were the straight man and Tiki played the opposite role, but you are both as guilty-without any doubt! This guy just magically comes across an ebay purchase out of the blue from ebay back records. Yeah right-Ok Hyper! EXCUSE ME! THE ALBERGO TIE IS WITH THE GRIMALDI OF GENOA AS SAID IN THE PROPER SOURCE LISTED PREVIOUSLY_ YOUR BOGUS REWRITTING OF HISTORY WILL NOT BE TOLLERATED AND YOU WILL BE REPORTED TO WIKIPEDIA! WHEN GUSTAV DOESN""T KNOW TRUE HISTORY- HE MAKES IT UP OR HE TRIES TO DELETE REMARKS THAT POINT OUT HIS UNSCRUPULOUS ARTICLE WRITING-YOU WILL BE REPORTED TO WIKIPEDIA-RETURN THE PERFECTLY GOOD ARTICLE THAT WAS DESTROYED! " +" There is a rule for it: WP:HE. The short version is that popular English forms should be provided first; Greek text should be provided; the Greek text should always be glossed; the gloss should use the appropriate format (the scholarly transliteration formats for ancient or modern Greek as appropriate). There are iffy cases and some minor differences between systems, but for the most part just choose one and be consistent in the article and you should be fine. In your case, it's a modern name and there's no difference between names from 1500 or 2000: accent marks and diaereses are included and everything else is left out. — LlywelynII Macron and breve These are included in the Beta Code and here but there is no explanation for what they're supposed to do. — LlywelynII " +The Magic Years Promotion +" Your Comments on Davien Crow Delete. NN. having a poem published does not make you a poet, let alone a notable one. getting a picture on the wall at school does not make you an artist, let alone a notable one. but since the musicianship seems to be whats really at issue, i say Delete until the 2006 album is released, then if (and only if) that album meets the music test recreate. Nateji77 I would like to point out that WP:MUSIC only has to be met by 1 requirement. So even if you do not view the CDs released on Kidatrium and Mushroomcloud Records as ""Albums"", the fact still remains that they (his band Sin Star) has been on 2 national tours. The remarks you made about the picture on the wall at school is churlish btw, VCU's center for the arts is very reputable for it's art galleries if you read the page on them here at wikipedia you'd know. Those tidibits you took cheap shots at were simply part of the biography, not claims to notability. The Music and the Web Design Company should be the deciding factors, and they DO meet the rules... So please reconsider. By all means message me back if you wish to discuss this. Look the point summarized is I am willing to work with you guys on why these were deleted but until now noone has given us any feedback and has even lied about stuff trying to get it deleted. All 3 of them meet the sufficient amount of requirements for WP:MUSIC, the guidelines in WP:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies, Wikipedia:Importance, Wikipedia:Notability (the fact that suicide girls, gidget gein, and marilyn manson are involved and can be verified in those links should proove that) , Wikipedia:Fame_and_importance mainly the part stating ""There is clear proof that a reasonable number of people are or were concurrently interested in the subject (eg. it is at least well-known in a community)"" If you can't tell the community of Myspace.com and Livejournal.com alone are enough to meet this criterea you are blind. If you do google searches, go to forums and search their names, or visit internet archives you can find un-disputable information on the band from reputable sources, first hand accounts that are years older than these discussions, and intangible archives kept by internet archives. IF you want more detail read my above rant, your right I do sound mad about this, because I can't see how you can say they do not meet criterea or that this is a vanity page. Please accept my apologies for anything you have taken to be rude and please re-consider changing your vote. What Harm could it do ? BTW I am not trying to bully anyone, I can show you the location of the people threatening to come here and vandalize the hell out of Wikipedia. But I do not want that to be part of your decision at all. (please reference the large rebuttle on the discussion page itself) I have posted this, I hope that some of you will consider looking for my information and reconsider your vote for now. A lot of people are simply responding to the rudeness of user:sin-thetik and some things I said are being misconstrude as threats. I am simply upset because of all the time it took to write these 3 articles, knowing they fit the guidelines, only to have somone delete them with the proof and verifiable facts right in front of them .. just their un-willingness to read them. Please think it over, I appreciate your time. I'm just a fan girl trying to be the first to get an article up about them since I have been running a fan site about them for almost 2 years now." +" WQA ""Pots and kettles""? ""Drive-by"" A bit harsh, it seems to me, for a place which is trying to promote civility. Not that I disagree with the closing of the discussions. Anyway, changed the tags to NWQA per the criteria under volunteer instructions. " +HEY PUTZ, JOE is EVERY WHERE some one disagrees with your thuggry +"Maybe someone like John Little can come along and improve the article. I am a college prof. who lifts weights; I have all of this knowledge of Mentzer stuck in my head,going back to 1978. I was hoping to provide some info. on a neutral forum, as Mentzer's ideas are often censored out of mainstream lifting/bb blogs. If the AynRand/Mentzer link is enough to get a good Mentzer article here, so be it. I simply don't have time to fool with it anymore or track down sources; cut it up as you will. I am sure there are muscle writers out there who can document everything in the piece. The 12 week lag is in Sisco's book; the controversy over olifts is so vast that a huge number of pro and con arguments can be cited. fbjm1979@yahoo.com Maybe ""Mentzer CLAIMED to have the only valid theory of bb"" would address the discussion post below. fbjm1979@yahoo.com " +Wow, I overlooked the publisher for The Washington Post when I looked at it yesterday. Yes, use the publishers that are listed for both. (meow) +Perhaps you'd like to sign your post with your user name. +The major problem with automating Eng->US translation is that it would also translate the titles of references, you would need to tell it to ignore anything between ref tags. +I am working from sources. I'm not sure about a major rewrite; I almost certainly won't have time to do it. +What are you going to do now that you know where I live, tell all the people in New Zealand that I am a heritic, and a blasphamer and that I should be excommunicated from New Zealand, because I defied the holy priesthood of wikipedia, and wikiscience? +What? The guy clearly has consistently destroyed your arguments. Why do you feel the need, when presented with such a massive body of evidence pointing quite clearly towards to contrary (concerning the phrase in question), to argue against it and then when finally beaten claim that further debate would 'violate wikipedia policies'. You quite clearly are a militantly pro-Atheist, pro-Nietzschean fool who can't accept anyone challenging his, and therefore irrefutable, view of the world. Just goes to show though, you are just as dogmatic as the priests from the pulpit you so deride. +FranklinJessop you just missed everything i said. Please read the verifiability, not truth Policy. +If Kober wants facts about Gamsakhurdia's interview on Armenian TV before leaving for Grozny he can contact www.armtv.com to ask them to find it from the archive. I saw the interview myself 15 years ago and have all the rights to post that information as a historical witness. Wikipedia is a popular encyclopedia and not a literature review master paper or peer reviewed journal of articles. There is no need to bring citations or references after each sentence. In that case we can just do a google search or yahoo search and read the articles in the primary sources. Wikipedia is a place where people should decide which is right and which is wrong.Moreover witnesses are number one primary sources. +" Oppose See my previous comments. Talk " +Inviting you to WikiAfrica Incubator! Hey Loyola, WikiAfrica invites you to support the Africa Incubator WikiAfrica is pleased to invite you as a self-declared African Wikipedian to evaluate the Africa Incubator. WikiAfrica has created the Africa Incubator to support and assist new authors, as they create their first articles and learn the ins and outs of contributing to Wikipedia. The Africa Incubator is a ‘soft landing’ for new authors to develop articles that relate to Africa. It assists them in becoming compliant and knowledgeable of Wikipedia principles and rules. Based within the Wikipedia framework, the Africa Incubator is fully interactive and enables feedback, assistance and forums. This is where we need your help! For the Africa Incubator to be successful, it needs the intervention, interaction and experience of Incubator Mentors. We are looking for a pool of active experienced Wikipedians to consistently participate in ’owning’ the Africa Incubator. Incubator Mentors will assist new comers through the editing process. They will also help test and expand the Africa Incubator, and will play a vital role in encouraging newcomers to be Wikipedians for life Please visit WikiAfrica Incubator to give us your honest feedback and evaluation. WikiAfrica is a ground-breaking project that is designed to Africanise Wikipedia by generating and expanding 30,000 articles over two years. Find out more about this project here WikiAfrica. To get involved, contact Francis [wikipedian@wikiafrica.net] Twitter: twitter.com/#!/wikiafrica Facebook: www.facebook.com/WikiAfrica Awinda +Category Should this page have another category? I thought I remembered reading that a page should have at least two categories but cannot find the policy at the moment. Any suggestions? +This is a shared IP adress. Please refrain from junking it up. +A tag has been placed on User:Azimuth Films UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | Talk +Congratulations ...on our TFA yesterday. It was a long, hard fought battle we began last year around this time but we finally made it! And Heidi seems to be doing well so far. With any luck I may be able to nom it at TFA for its 43rd anniversary. I also purchased the new book on the Sack Exchange but I'm thinking of shelving that project until the spring in favor of Super Bowl III. Talk +Classification as a single I know for certain that this is a promotional single, at least it is in the UK, but I'm not yet sure if this is to become a full single... I have updated the article as if it was, adding the infobox template and using information and references from the main X article, but should this page require deleting I understand the reasoning. However, if this becomes a candidate for deletion, I shall save the current version to my talk page so it can be re-uploaded easily as and when it is required +"An interesting observation, considering the repeated efforts to edit out (and block users to add it) references to the Boston College one-historic campus ""now covered in vast expanses of concrete."" " +" You also can't call The Cure or Siouxsie and The Banshees a gothic rock band because they reject the term. Do you not understand my point? They always refer to their music as ""dance music"", although they get called a indie rock band. She Wants Revenge's genre has been discussed on their wikipage numerous times that they ARE Darkwave. Darkwave as a genre is not Industrial, as it is today, by itself it is New Wave Music with dark overtones, for example see The Frozen Autumn or Pink Turns Blue. The band takes huge influence from both new wave AND gothic rock, as well as other genres, but darkwave usually takes influence from other genres - so does Gothic rock. There's a huge difference. If it wasn't for She Wants Revenge's huge popularity there would be no doubt that She Wants Revenge is Darkwave. Please respect the page as I know you may not be a fan - their true fans understand the music." +THATS WHAT YOU DID BEFORE SHE WROTE A WORD ON THIS DEBATE. YOU REMOVED MY TEXTS 9 TIMES NOW, AND I REINSERT THEM AS MANY TIME. CEREAL KILLER IS INFORMED OF THIS AND IS FOLLOWING IT. ALL EVIDENCES AGAINST YOU ARE BEING COLLECTED ON THE INTERNET, AT THIS HOUR, WITH THE AIM TO ARREST YOU AT YOUR APPARTMENT FOR INFAMIE DISCRIMINATIONS MANIPULATION AND CENSORSHIP OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, ATTACKS TO PERSONS PRIVATE LIFE, COMPUTER HACKING, AND AGGRAVATING FORDGERY OF EVIDENCES. I HAVE BUILD AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK AGAINST YOU OF ALL THE PEOPLE WICH WORDS YOU ONCE ABUSED OF, AND BELIEVE ME THEY DIDN'T LIKE IT AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO LET IT PASS. SOPHIE. +" Will do, but I hope it doesn't come to that. YO! " +(UTC) Perhaps Anti Japanese Militarism? 03:43, 6 May 2007 +" I partially see what Jerzeykydd is saying. If an article is published saying that it is believed So-And-So ""will not run in 2012,"" then we should not be able to use that article as one of the three sources necessary to support So-And-So as a potential 2012 candidate. The article must say that So-And-So at least ""might run"" or ""ought to run"". However, as long as there are three articles within the last six months that do advocate the possibility or desirability of So-And-So's running for President in 2012, we ought to keep So-And-So listed on the page, even if common sense dictates that they will not run (Dick Cheney, Mark Sanford, et. al.), simply for consistency's sake. " +In fact,the tibetans retreated from Tuyuhun and sent gold. The Tibetan View? The Tibetan historical records didn't mentioned this war. +Notre Dame project invite Also, if you're interested specifically in ND football, we're looking to create a task force for that, and you could join. Feel free to ask any questions you have +Help needed Help is needed in cleaning up/debunking/verifying/holding to a higher standard in the article Male Pregnancy +You twit The vandalism with which you charge me was an edit to MY contribution, which you might see if you got your head out of your ass for a breath of fresh air. +" Responding here to SlimVirgin's point about purging of the archives. That stops people gaining accessed to WMF-held archives of the list, but it does nothing about personal copies of mailing list correspondence kept by individual arbitrators. There are some arbitrators who have been on the committee for years (much longer than I was), and if archives are purged then any personal archives they may hold would be the next logical target. There are ways to make that attack vector less vulnerable, though, and purging the archives would ensure that new arbitrators only have access to what they get while on the committee. So on balance, I think purging of the archives is something that should, and likely will, be done. Trouble is, it looks like it is a bit late now, and it also raises the problem of verifying the leaks. How can you verify that a ""leak"" is genuine if the mastercopy has been destroyed? " +P.P.S. By the way Duncan. Your curious use of the word “BANNED” in the above section heading permalink here) doesn’t strike me as appropriate under the circumstances. Please consider retroactively revising the heading since only something springing directly and clearly from Wikipedia’s Five Pillars or ArbCom could “ban” anything on Wikipedia. We certainly need “more talky” before using such language. +" is right - the lead section is meant to be a summary of the article, and therefore all information in the lead section should be in the body. As long as it's cited in the body of the article it's fine - citing the same information twice is redundant. Check Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 16 where in a Good Article review of ""Jihad (song)"" the consensus was the lead doesn't need citing. If this is the only basis for placing this GAC on hold, I'd recommend Shadowhalo go to Good Article Review as I did. " +Hello. Your edits to binomial distribution may have been well-intended but they introduced some disorganization, and you shouldn't be mentioning your name. The article's edit history identifies who did the edits. I'll look at the mathematical details and see if I can restore what you did in a way that conforms to Wikipedia's conventions about formatting and organizing of articles. +" Image copyright problem with Image:Halo08.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Halo08.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  (Parrot) " +Expansion? Chad Kroeger's page deserves to be bigger than this, there's nothing even hear about his signature Les Paul... +That was fast (and it seems you'r eright.) What do you know about his early career with the Brotherhood? There doesn't seem to be lot available on this guy. +reorganisation of 10 August (French Revolution) Courtesy call: I have today moved the above article from 10th of August (French Revolution), as being a title more consistent with WP's acceptable date formats. In the same vein, I have created the following redirects: August 10, 1792 10 August 1792 I have also put up some of the existing redirects for deletion as follows: Journée of the 10th of August Journee of the 10th of August Insurrection of the 10th of August Revolution of the 10th of August +May I call you BillKitty? Meow! +I think that you have a point here...but I can't think about at the moment. Thanks anyway for dropping me a note. +TRPoD is correct in regard to canvassing and its attendant woes. Speaking of the state of the article, I believe a talk page is intended for discussing concrete improvements? It's hard to find an actionable suggestion amid the luridly lengthy and tumescently inexorable errors. If the poster believes there is an NPOV concern in the article, the 25+ pages of archives are thataway and discuss this at length, concluding in a consensus that is reflected in the article. +Refugee camps in Tindouf Province, Algeria| +While the ring is automatically available to all graduates of accredited engineering programs in Canada, it is not exclusive to those engineers. Engineers from other countries can get an iron ring by asking nicely. If they are working in Canada as engineers and are registered as professionals in the province(s) in which they work, they can contact a local camp and arrange to receive their ring at the next ceremony. +" Tom Viezee I agree it should be deleted, no hits in google books, probably a vanity article, it does happen from time to time. PLease deelte it. I'd db author it but I'm not the sole author.♦ Dr. Blofeld " +" I just don't see the utility of having ""notable"" anywhere as a designation in the ""list of choirs"". Presumably, if this is Wikipedia and the essence of an item's existence on Wikipedia is its notability, then notability should be a precursor for inclusion of any choir in any part of the list. Absolutely! I'm a little dubious as to the purpose of/need for the list in the first place (but I'll make that argument over on the page itself). The designation of ""notable"" in just some of the category headings is entirely unnecessary. BTW, I'm one of the founders of ChoralNet (where I maintain the world's largest directory of choir websites), and Chor Leoni is indeed extremely notable, without a doubt! " +" YOU SUCK BIG DONK! Headline text LOLZ! L2P YA BIG NUB! WHO SEZ ""SIGH"" IN RESPONSE TO SOMETHING? WHAT AN AZN! LOLZ! <(^_^)>! THATS KIRBY! PWNED IN THE BUTTOKS! LOLZ! HOW EMBARRASSING! DO YOU EVEN HAVE A JOB? LOL NOOBS" +discussion on this page== +" Shotokan dispute end of Feb thru beginning of Apr 2006 (Original message:) Hey you haven't violated this rule, but I just wanted to make sure you know about WP:3RR, because you're one revert away from violating it if you do so in the next couple of hours. Also, an anon editor has suggested mediation on the edit dispute, see Talk:Shotokan... I'd suggest you do it.. you and the other editors are all obviously acting in good faith, and just need some neutral, honest outside input. (Reply:)Yes, I'm aware of the ""3RR"". I talked it over with a friend here and I may be abandoning my Shotokan effort for the forseeable future. Thanks for your time and your input. Regards, " +" Replied on your talk. msg " +" I'm currently in a different time zone. And I'm not taking the blame for ""provoking a freeze"". That was RookZERO who started it. I was willing to discuss on the talk page all along. But yes, I asked for it, because I like my time well used (like for sleeping). Bye for now. " +This is not season 5. History's own webpage (which is correct - you cannot argue against the people who make it) says these new episodes are part of season 4. On iTunes it shows that these new episodes are season 5 but this is wrong. For a while, History's own webpage had these episodes down as season 5 but reverted it a couple of weeks in to the series. Also, look at the 'Complete Series 4' Top Gear USA DVD. It was released in December of last year and contains these episodes that we are discussing along with the ten we can both agree were in series 4. SERIES 5 HAS NOT BEEN MADE YET. +My apologies, the inclusion of INS in that sentence was an oversight, which I corrected. The INS case you refer to relates to the original charge sheet, I'm not disagreeing with that at all. The fact of the matter is that there was a guilty plea, a sentence was passed in a court of law, it was passed by a judge, and the sentence passed was in accordance with the terms of agreement set out in the Alford Plea. +" You are a dick! nerd. Jonah Young out. Add me on Facebook. <3 8======D~~ A kitten for you! go fuck your self " +All that really matters is that content is improved. You don't want to mislead anyone who has put in the effort of an uninvolved comment, so any large changes that might directly affect someone's recorded opinion should be noted for claritymany will watchlist or return to a discussion to adjust their views as the situation develops. Any changes made in good faith, and respectful of apparent consensus, are to be encouraged. Beyond that, the process is designed to help improve the articles, so it should never stand in the way of doing so. — tizzle +TMCk, thank you for clarifying your position that you did not intend your previous comment as a personal attack. Here is a link to an ABC News article. I hope you will recognize this as another reliable source that Steve Moore is a real person and a retired FBI agent. ”Moore, a 25-year FBI veteran who investigated murders around the world before retiring two years ago, has independently researched and analyzed her case for the past year…” http://abcnews.go.com/International/amanda-knox-innocent-retired-fbi-agent-steve-moore/story?id=11541334 As to how he obtained the evidence he analyzed, I don’t know. But from looking at the pictures and details posted on that injusticeinperugia website, he did apparently get it somewhere. +North Sea I think the GA could proceed. I noticed new content, and added citations for such. But I think if it stays somewhat stable, it should be not too bad I hope. Kind Regaards | talk +":To drop the map now showing, in addition to the photo, in the NRHP2 infobox, just delete ""locmapin = Ohio"". In the NRHP2 infobox, you can have both map and photo, while in the NRHP infobox you can have just one or the other. I am working on changing the NRHP2 infobox so that it displays in IMAGE-INFO-MAP order, rather than current IMAGE-MAP-INFO order, because the map seems to be 3rd priority. Just go ahead and drop the map, that would be fine. " +" Modesty ""I am a 13-year old smart male"". Come on mate, no one likes arrogance." +, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Hmmm. It seems a large number of photos have been deleted Refer http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Citadel,_The_Military_College_of_South_Carolina&oldid;=298694103 Cheers, 09:44 +What a complete and utter waste of time. Tony Sidaway +" Image:Joe.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Joe.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tex " +" Do you have sources to back up your claims? §croak " +, 24 June 2006 (UTC) Nevermind. I find the Arb template I am supposed to use. talk-email 19:04 +" She is not Mark Harmon's sister. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.8.237.10 " +Well, I'm not or , which leaves... ) (Have a nice day!) +" Wow, thanks, ! That happened much faster than I expected, and looks great. As for whether the punctuation should be outside the bolding, I believe that's usually the case, but I can see the argument being made that the entire rest of the line is bolded and so in this peculiar case the colon should be too. I don't think the bolding (or not) of the colon is that big a deal, though. One of those ""I'm not gonna revert it, but if someone else does I'm not gonna revert that either"" cases. Thanks again, contribstalk " +" Same-sex marriage in the United States I've undone your revert on the intro to this article, because although it's in good faith, I think it's mistaken. The reason you gave was that the information is elsewhere in the article, which is already long, so the intro shouldn't cover it even in summary, as it's in the main body under ""History"". Although I respect your intent of keeping it concise and avoiding redundancy, the Manual of Style for the intro is quite clear: The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects ... [It] should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies ... The lead is the first part of the article most people read, and many only read the lead. The issue here is that the intro currently says that state bans were declared unlawful in 2015, 38+ states provided some rights as from 2003, and Windsor gave federal rights in 2013. There needs to be some mention of the backdrop and prior controversies as they were huge, and an increase from 2 to 3 paras to add substance on the background + context is (in my view) appropriate: even very long articles still need a proper introduction that summarizes their contents. Take a look at African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) for an example of the intro to a long-ish article. If you disagree with my reasons, maybe we can take it to the talk page and raise it there/see what others say first, before re-reverting. FT2 (Talk | email) " +It is true that I can not read urdu but this is not the point which i want to make. My point if simple, on wikipedia we are not usually encourage to put our own point of views. For example the reference you put are biased on one openion and in one direction that is Anti Ahmadiyya websites. How can some one claim that the material which is published on Ahmaiyya site is edited..even if it is edited to suit something, we must accept it as an Official point of view of a community, we dont have to agree with it, but we have to accept it as Official point of view. So if you put some information from an Anti Ahmadiyya web site it will be biased as on the official web site you dont find this information, the best informaiton will be if we can match this information on both sides, other wise, regardless true or false, it will remain Biased and that is against the Policy of Wikipedia. That is why i have suggested earlier that there is no restriction on puting information on open plate form like Wikipedia, but instead of puting on this artical there are other artical where this information can be put it. For example, there are Artical like Islam and Quran, but Critism on Islam is a totally different Artical, so the Islam Poisition is defined in Islam Artical, but Critism was defined in other Artical. If a Bio Artical like Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a Bio Artical, the Critism or his so called failed Prophecies, will not suit for this Artical. You can even creat a new Artical more suitable to the title and information against him or his Community. This will be more sources, more reliable and athenticated rather called Biased and may be reverted repeatedly. And we are here to be neutral even we dont belief on such things, did not give us right to present information which is offensive to any one, no matter which faith he or she belongs... regards.. +P.S. You do know that RAW should be capitalized for the refs.? +" Tillery ""Eh? What?"" - it's an article you had doubts about in 2005. (The mills of Wikipedia gring slow, but...) It's at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tillery after a history of doubts and some dubious edits. And two editors who currently can only find mirrors... " +I have even put up new ones. Read the whole article. 149.254.192.195 +Unless you have evidence that says it isn't false, which you don't, then myth stands. It is a widely held false belief. We're done here. +" My reply can be found here. talk " +Hi Sorry, I read your article too quickly. I though it said that the GG was soverign. However according to [] Elizabeth II is soverign of the orders. So who is soverign ? The Jamaican GG ? Also The Jamaican honours system has another page on wikipedia []. I just found it. +Ok, I was pissed and I overreacted. I apologize too then.71.232.157.145 +Anyhow, they're all based on DuMaurier. +Yes there is cable access tv. That is not mainstream. +" Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stutton, Suffolk. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Will (aka ) " +Creating stubs and the assignment of week 11 Hi Navarco! I have a question concerning the assignment of this week. We should work on suggestions which have been given to us. Pbord has kindly suggested me to turn some of the red links of my article into blue ones by creating stubs of few lines. What do you think? Would it be pertinent? Thank you! +That would make sense. The new Party constitution doesn't give the leader much more control actually! But that will change this year I'd have thought. +"By the way, I appreciate you completing skipping over the first step of punishment for ""personal attacks"". You gave me no warning, which I am due for a first offense. You went straight to a block. Thank you for abusing your power, or just being plain ignorant to the guidlines and rules of the site in which you are an admin to. " +(plus the 3 editors in addition to myself who presented first-hand evidence) +request/idea You are going to remove soon. I think I have a possible solution. User Panonian has in the past created many great maps. Could you ask him to help out? Here, that is his talk page where I asked. If you ask too, we could achieve much in terms of ending the problematic discussion with Ceha on that page. Here are some past maps that he has created, which demonstrate that he can do this. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vojvodina_politics_map.png http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Danube_banovina.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vrbaska_banovina.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vardar003.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sandzak_region_map.png As you see, he has created maps for some other Yugoslavia Banovinas in the past. I am sure that he would be willing to make another one for the Croat Banovina, but it would help if you ask him. ( ). +Fragment offset In the examples in this article the fragment offset is measured in bytes, however RFC 791 states that fragment offset is measured in groups of 8 bytes (64 bits). In my opinion this article should be updated... +topics (ie offbeat topics) +It all works for me too. Well done everyone, and thanks for your patience and civility.__ +umm.. are you a boy or a girl cause just wanted to know if i could get some pics of you?/ kind regards Wilko +" Sukecchi: You are out of your league, and I'm about to yank my son from influences like you. ""Tons of people"" you say. In the first place, 'ton' is a measure of weight, not popuation. No one has a problem with your sexuality, we just don't want to read about it on Wikipedia, nor do we want to read how desperate you are for a boyfriend. Dude, get a my space page. And for you, Chaser: you've become so involved with this site that you are losing touch with reality. Ask yourself what Wikipedia is about, then review your main man Sukecchi's home page. There are people that enjoy defacating on babies but it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. I believe both you and Sukecchi need to get out of the basement, get some freash air, and if you're as intelligent as you thing you are see the world. My wife and I just got back from China, what have the two of you been doing. One more thing: Sukecchi, that your gay does not mean you cease to be a man. So suck it up and be a man. Men do not get ""deeply offended"" nor do we go to other men for help when a 13 year old is kicking our ass." +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to American Jews. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (speak to me) " +I have drafted an article about Game On. Feel free to add to it. +" ""I can not say that the edits from User:Oldstone James are very good when he re-adds peacock terms and insists on putting national years in the opening paragraph""... and the haters gunna hate hate hate hate hate... You are surprisingly generally right about everything else though, which really IS a RARE situation. No offence. You still are a hater. " +Smash Lab, Part III I guess you win, Adolph. You go right ahead and be the Gestapo on Wikipedia - I'm done! +FUCK WIKIPEDIA ON WHEELS! Fuck off wikipedia you fat bastard on wheels who eats your own shit! +Anouncement I've got the B.Blunderdome video in Ukrainian but I don't remember any shots when Gibson is holding an Oskar in his hands. Promotional artwork don't show the episode at all... +" The Dick The DickHead Award BOOOOOOO " +Vandalism continues with disguised (and frankly offensive) edit summaries. +There is no contradiction in those statements at all. The Polynesians who settled New Zealand became the Māori - they are the same people - and the phrase 'the Polynesian ancestors of the Māori' is a common one in NZ scientific literature. The point is that there was no one in New Zealand when the ancestors of the Māori arrived. I like the phrase 'Polynesian ancestors of the Māori', but maybe it is confusing to those who haven't heard it before. +Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. This site does not appear to a reliable source. (talk) +fuck u ur a fuckin faggot +Robeson considered himself all Black. He also did not living during an era (1898-1976) where be could be multi-racial. That said, via his own words, he would have always chosen to be Black identified if there were options. His native American and white ancestors are mentioned in his main article. 7:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC) +Removal of non free images I removed File:Dr John Zoidberg.png from your userspace. Please look at WP:FAIRUSE. Talk/Contribs/Vote! +User:Minsk59/Sandbox I note that you reverted my edits on (talk) - +I reoved the trivia I had to do it. +Only if it was what the person was notable for and it was a fair description of their actual profession: see Anna Nicole Smith. There is this other close precedent too. +After looking into it, it does say on quite a few sites that she graduated from high school in 1979. +" ipod thanks for telling me how 2 act ""mom"" maybe i will approach the confirmation of a new ipod in a more mature way. i deeply apologize." +" Cheers! I have been away, and am now back (sorta), and you were away, and are now back (sorta). So, good to see you! Cheers! -The'FortyFive' " +REDIRECT Talk:Sikkim mountain vole +"#: It is quite obvious that Mr. Meyers is not an expert in Romanian language. Giving so many wrong examples I wonder if not he is an ignorant instead of ""expert"". Anyway he is confused enough and more he is confusing others... What Bogdan said above is absolutely right. So, don't come here with unprofessional proofs. talk & contribs " +" Neutral Nazism Wikipedia is supposed to present neutral and unbiased information, yet as I look at the Nazism page, I see much information which is substantially inaccurate. The wording of it seems, as well, biased against Nazism. Where's all the information about the ""common interest before the individual interest?"" That was the core of the Nazi program and decidedly the base of Nazism. What about the idea of a ""race soul?"" What about the SS Racial Theory? Where is all of this information? This is not just significant information in regards to this article, it is essential. These things are what comprised Nazism and defined it. All I'm seeing is ""white power,"" ""holocaust,"" and ""Jews.""" +Hundreds of books written about ethnic conflict (search google book store) of Sri Lanka talking about magha's invasion. Why it can't be in WP ? +" That's ridiculous. First of all, they are NOT the only two people editing this page. Second of all, regardless of THEIR behavior, YOU should always behave decorously. This is not some ""ends justify the means"" conflict. When someone asks you to justify your edit, do it. Period. If you can't do that, you shouldn't make edits. 18:37, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)" +" For the life of me I cannot remember who it is, but one of the operators was out at a wedding recently and unable to attend to the problem. There are people on IRC who know more.  (talk) " +" Bwilkins So that ★★''' " +"== hello! == concerning your additions on Immortal Technique's discography, good job! the singles were missing. but i am not sure if the 3 internet bootlegs/mixtapes shoudl appear there as well. but maybe, since he gained a fair share of his fanbase through the internet it should stay there - but maybe it should say ""internet/peer to peer"" only or something. keep it up! )" +LOL, check out Bloefeld too, he has a ton possibly most of any human. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee +After 5 days of no input by either side of this prod, I will have to go ahead and remove the prod myself. It is a shame that no other users are commenting on the talk page for MapleSim, so I don't know where to go from here. I will remove the prod and hope that some users come by the page. Orangemike, placing notability aside, do you think the article was written with a NPOV, so that it could be posted on Wikipedia? Would it be possible to perform the edit request, and we continue with this debate in the meanwhile? Thank you. +My old friend DECO It kept hitting me that there was something familiar about your user name but I did not have time to take a break until now to check it out and then realized that yes it was in fact you. Sly devil! If you have not yet checked out the discussion which began on user 's robotics project page here and on his talk page here after he posted his robotics project banner on the Optimal classification discussion page doing so might help clarify the reason for his doing this nomination for deletion. Honestly, I think that if he were not a backstabber he would have merely added methods to the article which perform the same function. Thanks again for alerting me that the deletion on the discussion page was most likely due to my edits. Thanks. +sure, there aren't many such actions for general U, but given an action one can choose an invariant U, I do not see a problem here. If you want to change def. to more stadard(?) it is fine, but I like this one... If you change to diffeomorphsm it will give the same orbifold, but the def will become mor complecated. I do not know a good ref. I'm not sure but it seems that Thurston was mostly interested in 3-d case. I took a def from some paper (now I do not remember which) and modifyed it a bit 12:09, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC) +How about this, GO FUCK YOURSELF!! +can also use them to make detailed island maps with annotations on. +": Add more contents to the article with reliable references. You may take help of search engines such as bing and Google for finding more information. But one thing you should keep in mind that your article should not violate the Wikipedia policy. Indian Talk " +" Citation needed? in the sentence ""An early, open source implementation of L-BFGS in Fortran exists"" I would expect some citation and/or link to this reference that seems important. No?" +/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism this], cheers, 13:56, 26 +" You continue with the angle that you are capabable of NPOV. No one is is capable of NPOV regarding a Political isssue here in the US at this time but least of all you. One has only to read your contributions to see that you clearly have no interest in neutrality. I have admited my POV from day one while everyone conservative has to have the rock they hide under lifted. (see Ai.Kefu) The game at hand here now is how much truth can be added by the liberal P'sOV before it is sanitized and censored by the conservative side. There should be no pretense of neutrality here or on any other political site just a much more modest goal of contributors finding some semblance of ""balance"" between the two distinct P'sOV in the overall article. There is no way the article can remain ""Fluffy"" with no mention of her deeds and or disdain from the entire black community and the other communities of whom civil rights are trampled on. I just wish the large negative View about a Condi would stop being sanitized summarily. If you cannot admit that neutrality is impossible from you or any other conservative or liberal contributor then the conversation we are pretending to have can come to a quick cessation and we can just agree to disagree so we can resume with the rapid fire edit/revert/bashing/revert/censorship... activity that will lead to the ultimate freezing of the article " +With so little other material presented about the nominal topic, the detailed coverage of NDGT here constitutes a pretty clear WP:POVFORK and a WP:COATRACK. Please let the RFC at the bio page run its course before trying to insert the material anywhere where it might plausibly fit. +Blind reversions I would appreciate it if you would actually check what you are reverting. You reverted Discospinster after he undid a paragraph deletion. You then reverted me when I tried to fix your mistake. +I made the change. Ucucha +Hi, Welcome to wikipedia! I noticed your edits to the article dependency grammar. Given its formatting, it appears to be a cut-n-paste from some other article or publication. Where is this copied from? Who is the original author? Please let me know, and reply on my talk page User talk:Linas or at the article talk page Talk:Dependency grammar. Thanks Oh, and by the way: +" Popular culture Re. ""Never edit any articles on popular culture. They're horribly overrepresented. You like them? You do them."" Gee, you might not make friends this way, but I admire your forthrightness. I often find works of popular culture to be bleak and life-denying, so I see where you're coming from. I once put into popular culture that claim that it's good that the Wikipedia has all this popular culture stuff in it, because we'll understand the people of the 21st century better if we document their cultural detritus with care. Sort of like a biologist carefully dissecting an intestinal parasitethere's things we ought to know for scientific purposes, even if the research task is unpleasant. Nice Ravenscroft, b.t.w.. Cheers, 23:19, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)" +Thanks Tony Sidaway. +" October 2008 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bob Carr. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ICE " +" Well thanks, I'll do so! " +Malta national rugby league team why do you keep reverting my edit on Malta national rugby league team? it is not vandalism, i was removing useless information and updating the page. this is a university ip adress, so obviously there has been vandalism in the past. if you read the edit, you would see that there is no vandalism and i have updated the page. please stop reverting it. +" Leadbeater Biography SmackBot problem Rich- Regarding the C.W.Leadbeater biography article,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Webster_Leadbeater, on 12 Dec ""Philosophus"" improperly reverted my extensive revision of Dec 9. I removed all the smears and slanders from the article yet he accuses me of having a NPOV problem. No editor has the right to revert the good faith contribution of another editor, I will undo his improper revert. As you made a minor edit or two since then, your edits will probably be lost, also. Please communicate specifically what faults you find in the text and maybe we can work out some compromise wording, if you are knowledgeable in the subject. If you are not knowledgeable you have no business. " +Article needs improvement Article is just a list of vedic deities which is excerpted from Griffin's book. Some points need to be corrected also. Article needs total revamp . If needed, please use the works of Indian scholars as well in devising this article and do no just rely on western scholars' work.141.160.26.251 +"Welcome! Hello, Tiffspiro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!      talk  " +Why was one edit war party blocked and the other rewarded? Why was Arzel blocked for edit warring at Fox News Controversies while PrBeacon who also participated in the edit war, reverting Arzel twice in the last 24 hours, left alone and granted his wish to block his edit warring partner? Surely Arzel wasn't blocked because he had 3 reverts in a 24-hour period instead of the 2 reverts of PrBeacon? +":::Epic you were the one that placed MY aerial photo on the Manhattan page, please use it now to place where the sun does not shine and do not contact me in any way, again. Thank you. talk→   " +Bhote Issue As long as you mention Bhote issue in Yolmo page, it will always be removed or tempered. +It's a good thought, but it's a common marketing ploy to put the name of the movie's well-known director/writer/producer in the front of the title to attract attention (like Stephen King's The Green Mile, Mario Puzo's The Godfather, etc.). So the title probably shouldn't be changed - otherwise, we'd have a glutton of movies (7 in this case) starting with that person's name. +Please leave all messages here. +A tag has been placed on Image:Breann Mcgregor.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: inappropriate image Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" I can't believe it You have been named an editor to avoid by . I bet you're so proud, you're in tears. Talk• Contributions " +" Why? Does one need a ""stake"" in something to discuss it on Wikipedia? As it happens my own bugbear is when people are accused of something they quite obviously haven't done. Hamster " +Wikipedia:ANI#Proposed unblock of User:Alarichus Either you didn't read my comments, or you're doing your best to make me look like some kind of whacko, thus discrediting my comments. I made it quite clear I was in no position to judge checkuser evidence. So, which is it? Are you a backstabbing creep, or an ignorant moron? Either way, it would be nice if you retracted your comment. +Peacock Language First I must say, ROFL! Second, be kind to small creatures. ) | Talk +I can speak and vocally understand Urdu, but after spending some years in Canada, I've forgotten to read and write Urdu. +" WP:NASCAR Newsletter (June 2012) Delivered by ''''''(Talk • Contribs) " +I'm so glad you and a few other editors are so vigilant on this subject. I trust that you agree with me that the Foundation, if it is concerned about this subject, needs to adopt a Conflict of Interest policy. I agree with the view recently expressed by another editor that one can't crowdsource a COI policy. Are you on board, Mr. 2001? +I am one of the Bureaucrats on en.wikipedia. Any one of us can make the usurpation when after the week's wait. There is no reason for you to wait for this Usurpation to become official. Go right ahead and secure the name in other wikipedia projects. Cheers, +"::Salon is not a source without its POV biases, and it certainly had a number of ideological axes to grind (including, most pertinently, a willingness to tar and feather any and all Arab and Islamic peoples as barbarians, and a totally uncritical way of looking at the Israel-Palestine conflict). Accepting their claims as the total truth is certainly problematic; it is made even more so when there isn't a way to actually check the veracity of the claim. Not being able to read the article, because of their damned clickthrough ads, I would personally appreciate if someone could post the section of the article in question. For the time being, ""Salon claims. . ."" is certainly the NPOV way to go. " +who cares if someone changes one example name.... its not like BOB has to be second and DAN has to be fourth in that cross country running example... that's the beauty of it... leaving your own little mark on the internet by changing ONE FREAKING, NON-FACT BASED, EXAMPLE name. im not a vandal at all, and have made many, many constructive page edits, you damn wikinazi. get a life. +Dear Piotrus, he's a stupid illiterate from Bucharest. Have you met intelligent people from Bucharest? +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk) " +REDIRECT Talk:Face to Face (British TV series) +British Isles usage +200.68.127.154 wrote (21:56 - 22:04, 22 February 2006): WHY YOU PROTECTED THAT PAGE????? FUCK YOU YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT YOU WROTE THAT STUPID COMMENT YOU KNOW NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU CAN'T PROTECT THAT PAGE FOREVER THE U.S. AND ARGENTINA SUCKS http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vsmith&oldid;=40766456 VSMITH AND ONEEUROPEANHEART AND PABLOFLORES ARE ALL FUKCING IDIOTS!!!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Huemul_Project&oldid;=40766701 VSMITH AND ONEEUROPEANHEART AND PABLOFLORES ARE ALL FUKCING IDIOTS!!!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comisi%C3%B3n_Nacional_de_Energ%C3%ADa_At%C3%B3mica&oldid;=40766655 VSMITH AND ONEEUROPEANHEART AND PABLOFLORES ARE ALL FUKCING IDIOTS!!!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instituto_Balseiro&oldid;=40766799 etc. +" Hello, Setnarto and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! | Talk |}" +GA Reassessment of Phi Delta Theta Hello. As a significant contributor to this article, I thought you would want to know that it has been placed on hold as a result of its GA Sweeps Review, which can be found here. –Whitehorse1 +Blocked This IP has been blocked for 24 hours for block evasion. See for the original block. +Go grab sand health hazard. +Yes, I think that you're going to need to reference that book. Especially since it the main English-language source on his activities during the war. +I actually ment the Student Cap - which I found through that article. Thanks for the help! +It's actually kind of funny, though. - +"| class=""infobox"" width=""150"" |- align=""center"" | Archives |- align=""center"" | 1 2 |} {" +Pathetic Article Doesn't mention the historiography whatsoever, whomever wrote this was clearly an imbecile and beneath contempt. 86.40.196.208 +Yeah, but that's 3 years back, I'm pretty sure that's one of the things that got cut... But again, I donno. +I do pride myself on my speed. 86.182.92.47 +" I DID ADD A FUCKING SOURCE BUT YOU DELETED IT! AND PLEASE FORGIVE ME FOR MY ""POOR EDITING""(!)" +" Promotional usernames Could you perhaps start checking to see if users have filed a CHU request prior to (instead of) blocking them? It would save some time unblocking after the requests are processed. Thanks, –xenotalk " +" Context is everything I noticed your complaint at the Arbcom enforcement page about Malleus, and I also noticed you had mentioned me there, without providing any diffs. Were you aware of this comment from MONGO from 5 September? If not it might be worth looking at it and considering amending your statement in light of this evidence that at least one (prominent and previously-sanctioned) American editor has started the ball rolling in the nationalism stakes. MONGO has never properly explained what exactly he was on about there, but it seems ridiculous to threaten Malleus with sanctions but not mention the antecedent behavior. Regarding my own behavior there, I have found the degree of resistance of the ""Defenders of the Wiki"" crowd to an article assessment process (that they themselves invited) quite frustrating at times, but I hope that if you feel anything I said there crossed the line, you would have the courtesy to raise it with me in the first instance rather than on an enforcement page. Thanks for your consideration. " +" Obsolete External Link The link titled, ""Blake Island Visitor Information"" is no longer available. Perhaps it's been shut down; I can't find any reference to it anywhere." +The only reason to include this, is that people take this to be relevant to human health. +" Discussion moved from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who I know you're all probably sick to your back teeth of hearing about it, but considering how we have just changed the name of the 1996 television film to Doctor Who (1996) (in my personal opinion, an infinitely better name), why not try to resolve the seemingly never ending debate of whether it is 100,000 BC or An Unearthly Child? Talk:100,000 BC (Doctor Who) 19:02, 9th January 2006 (GMT) Okay can we also try to bring peace to the Middle East and Northern Ireland, bring harmony between all religions, sort out whether the UK is an international or European country and all those other things that have been fiercely argued a lot? ;-) I hate to say it, but I think the debate is about to get a second wind, seeing as the upcoming American DVD release, The Beginning dubs the story An Unearthly Child and also uses the Edge of Destruction name for the Inside the Spaceship two-parter... I think you're right, and that we should think about people less familiar with the original series; after all, a lot of people who have only watches the Ninth and Tenth Doctors in action will snap up the boxset, to learn more about Doctor Who. Calling it An Unearthly Child will not only help these ""newbies"", but also seeth the feelings of quite a lot of Whovians I know. (As well as this, at least half of the sources I have seen - official or otherwise - call it ""An Unearthly Child""). 20:39, 9 January 2006 The current opener to the article and the redirects handle the requirements anyway. Fandom has long been deeply divided and I don't think some notion of appeasing one wing of the debate should direct where the Wikipedia page is located. I agree. As long as the proper redirects are in place and the article acknowledges the alternate titles, I think we're good. This isn't quite the same situation we had with the TV movie when an off-the-cuff remark by the producer calling it Enemy Within came to be seen as somehow official. (And the Doctor Who Information Network here in Canada apparently uses a different title altogether that was mentioned in a CBC profile of the series made to tie in with the Eccleston season. I forget the name that was used.). The CBC profile I think used ""Out of the Ashes"", which apparently came from a misreading of Shannon Patrick Sullivan's webpage. As for 100,000 BC vs. An Unearthly Child, I agree that the redirects and article opening make the issue less pressing, but I also think that the title used in the DVD release (which isn't just in the US, but UK as well) lends a bit more weight to the An Unearthly Child argument. However, if we do reconsider the page's location, I agree that it shouldn't be about appeasing one group or another, but what's best for the article. — (talk • contribs) The DVD releases seal it for me - these should both be at their DVD titles, with the others being redirects. That's a good point to raise. I personally believe that it should be An Unearthly Child; but then it's not up to me, and I fully understand where Josiah is coming from. Why don't we settle this once and for all: a democratic vote where Whovians like ourselves vote for one title or the other. Anyone else agree/have another idea? 16:18, 11 January 2006 I'll put my vote in as An Unearthly Child also. It's been said before, but I'll say it again. The title of the serial is 100,000 BC. The title of the first episode is ""An Unearthly Child"". The fact that BBC Enterprises releases the DVD as ""An Unearthly Child"" is a matter of marketing, not historicity, and neither here nor there. The real reason the serial was called An Unearthly Child to begin with was because of a mistake by the Radio Times. AUC redirects to the right page, and there's no confusion. I'd rather rename The Daleks to The Mutants rather than change 100,000 BC to that. (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 January 2006 +“OS, you're welcome to edit here if you make constructive edits to articles within our policies,” Come down please from your high horse Ms. SlimVirgin and answer my charge against you. If you liked AE so much that you were nominating him for administrator why you imposed yourself as the mediator? Why you were so unfair to me from the start and broke ALL the rules of Wikipedia. Now you accuse me of the same. I repeatedly asked you to be specific. You failed because you can’t. But I can. I can show you broke the rules of Wikipedia on many instances. Instead of lecturing me, you must apologize for being biased. “sweeping generalizations about certain religions?” So you don’t like any criticism about your religion do you? What part of my criticism of Islam was sweeping generalization? I have been very specific so far and tried to provide opposing views to Islam. You simply do not have the tolerance for that. That is why you decry my contributions and call them “sweeping generalization” or try to dismiss them as Islamophobia. Are views contrary to Christianity Chistianophobia? Do we have anyone crying Judaismphobia, Hinduphobia or Buddhistphobia? Why only Muslims make that claim? It is to silence any voice of opposition. You did that here and you even sided each time with my opponent to ban my views. This is unethical. Is that an insult? Am I allowed to say you acted unethically? Or would I be banned again? If this is not despotism what it is? Of course you can’t jail or kill me. But you do what you can. You censor me, violate my rights and ban me. Go ahead. Block me. That is all you can do. You are unable to respond to any of my accusations against you. So using force is all you can do. 09:02 27 Oct. 2005 +revert to a vandalised version. I've reverted to the clean version. Cheers. – Chacor +" Contrary to your inane ideas, you do not own me or Wikipedia. Do not tell me to be silent, or tell me how to write! And do not think that you can dictate what appears in Wikipedia! The following statements will be personal. You have made that necessary. I made no personal reference toward you, or anyone else. However, you made an inaccurate, subjective attack against me. Note that I have never made any edit whatsoever to the entry in question. I only expressed my concern one time on the discussion page. And you continue to censor and vandalize my statement. Yes, I realize that you immediately removed my comment because of your own racial prejudice. That is known as censorship. That is why I immediately reposted it, and why I am doing so again. You obviously have a very limited knowledge of the English language, and might more appropriately edit the Spanish-language version. Your statements here, as well as the others that you sent to me personally, are false, incorrect, inaccurate, misleading, rude and belligerent. I did not attack you or anyone else. And my assertions are completely correct. You criticize my comment, even though you are not even capable of reading and understanding it. Your writing is unintelligible, and your allegations are unfounded. Try to at least read and understand the one, referenced, sentence. Martin did not ""found"" a book, and he did not publish a foundation. The Ricky Martin Foundation has NEVER been published in ANY language. It certainly was not ""first published in Spanish"". This one statement, alone, exemplifies your profound ignorance. You do not know the meaning of the word ""found"". You have no idea what a foundation is. And you have absolutely no familiarity with the Ricky Martin Foundation. You are merely upset that I objected to the unnecessary, irrelevant use of Spanish on this English language wiki. Your objection is racially motivated and illegitimate. While I do not intend to elucidate the myriad of other examples, suffice it to say that a similar analysis would apply to every statement that you have made. You attempt to present yourself as an expert on everything, while in reality you are clueless in regard to most things. Further, you try to condemn me for doing exactly what you are doing. However, I did not do those things. You presume to educate me, while it is painfully obvious that you are only a very poorly-educated person. You accuse me of making a personal attack that does not improve the article. But you are making false statements in order to advance your personal attack on me. The truth is that I have never made any edit to the article. The arrogance of stupidity is astounding! I strongly suggest that you do not attempt to censor me, that you do attempt to acquire at least a rudimentary education, and that you do try to follow your own advice.66.166.137.98 " +Your susgestion to improve the article is?~~~~ +Issues with the current version 1. Eritreans are not Arabs and do not speak Arabic. Why are they included in the article? 2. The totally POV statment Historically, a number of minority Christian sects that were persecuted as heretical under Byzantine rule (such as Miaphysites) actually began to enjoy more religious freedom under initial Arab Muslim occupation than they had under Byzantine (Eastern Orthodox Christian) rule is completely erroneous. I have tons of historical accounts and references that talk about the massacres, atrocities and oppression committed by the invading Arab armies against the native populations of the region - most of whom were the Christians that this article is talking about. I suggest this statment gets removed (since it has nothing to do with the point of the article anyway). Otherwise, I will have to begin a new section that discusses the aforementioned sources. +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Comedy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +" OK, thanks for the quick reply. I have only one more question. One image from Bollywoodblog was featured on Zinta's article, but was not licensed under bblog's license; it was a fair use image which was used to provide a critical commentary. Does it mean that it has to be deleted too? It wasn't licensed with this bblog agreement. • Talk2me " +, 20 May 2007 (UTC) It is a neutral point of view. The article is just explaining the reality of Spain. Otherwise, ignoring this reality, would be lying. What would you add / remove, then ? 19:17 +wants to commit suicide because everyone on Wikipedia hates him.Please help me resolve the carriage dispute at Talk:Fuel TV. ''' +"== Jack Ryan == My primary reason for the formatting change was that the quote box completely interrupts the readers eyesight flow for the reception. While reading it, I was very jarred by the massive quote box's presence where I assumed the text would be. If we want the size to remain, that's fine, but it should definitely be aligned on the right. '''''' [[User talk:Corvoe|(speak to me)]] " +Thanks, dude! I was going to wait for more comments before I made my whole case, but just going ahead and implementing it is fine with me too haha ;). I think the main benefit to being able to sort decreasing is for projects like NRHP that have limits on their lists with links to full pages. Increasing order will only ever show the first x number of DYKs, which is static and not representative of the recent expansion of the project. Decreasing, on the other hand, will constantly refresh the contents of the main project page with the newest DYKs, an ideal solution. Thanks again for adding this. +you will see hell again.no matter what on earth i must do the wiki will accept myPOV or be crushed +G8 tempate Please add your voice to the discussion on the template. +There are several options you could consider. The most direct would be posting a move request on WP:RM in the Uncontroversial moves section. Make sure you mention that there has already been a discussion on the talk page (Provide a link to the section so the admin doesn't have to search for it) and that you would like an administrator to review the discussion. If the admin's or another editor move it out of Uncontroversial moves, you'll probably have to restart the discussion using the process described on WP:RM. +At the time Avi stepped in to stop the move war, the page was at Voßstraße. Therefore, protection had to be applied to that version. +Travel Plan and Helge Keitel Thanks for your information. I'm new to Wikipeida and this is a learning process. What do you suggest? Digital Villages is the main subjet I m working with and the idea is to integrate experiences from Italy into this. Yours Helge Keitel +Three questions 1. Why don't you use your administrative account anymore? You will need that account for administrative purposes. 2. Why do you remove stuff from this page? 3. Why did you unreasonably repeatedly delete User talk:202.76.162.34/Archive? +TREKFAN I don't want to be known as a Trekkie OR a Trekker!! I don't care where Lt. Barclay was born or Spock's last name. I just enjoy the great stories in the shows. They are fine drama that happen to take place in the 'sci-fi' future. So-I want to anounce hear and now that I AM A TREKFAN!! +Extra P.S.! As I was writing the above, the internet cafe I was in closed, so I walked a long way round (through some solitude in nightime nature too!) to another internet cafe. If you read the above post before I expanded it a bit, I hope that by signing another message, your computer will say that you have another message, to draw your attention to its more complete form! +It also isn't appropriate to put a non-article in Wikipedia. By your own admission above, your entry was a comment. Please see WP:FORUM. In fact, I suggest you read (or re-read) the whole of WP:NOT! +" Restricted biotech a characeristic of nanopunk?! The 2nd sentence in the article reads the following: ""The genre is similar to biopunk, but describes the world where the use of biotechnologies are limited or prohibited, so only nanites and nanotechnologies are widely use (while in biopunk, bio- and nanotechnologies often coexist)"" I'm really doubting the truth content of it. Basically I don't think that it's a characteristic of nanopunk that biotech is limited or prohibited even if some novels feature that. Additionally I'd rather say that this is a characteristic of biopunk with which a contrast is seeked here. Also ""so only nanites and nanotechnologies are widely in use"" is a non sequitur - it's not a logical conclusion that ""only nanites"" and nanotechnologies are widely in use because biotech is limited. Furthermore what's the ""only"" referring to? Only in which area of life - medical? social? every?! Also I don't think it's not impossible for biotech to coexist in nanotech even though it probably (and eventually that might be a core characteristic) plays a subordinate role. So I basically think everything about that sentence is false. I might be wrong about it (parts of it). So please post whatever you think of that here. If there are no objections I'm gonna delete that sentence and somehow get the ""in nanopunk biotech plays a subordinate role to nanotechnology""-part in there (which isn't really what the quoted sentence conveys). " +FYI Entomology ShaneKing, I applaud your contribution to the discussion at Atheism, but would like to point out a small issue that may be purposeful on your behalf, or may be a typo. Entomology is the scientific study of insects, whereas Etymology is the study of the origins of words. I am pointing this out to you as information only. Best regards ( 23:07, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)) +SK newsletter That is a good idea regarding Current, kept, and deleted articles. Which newsletter was it, and how did they find the articles? I think Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser would be able to do quite a lot of these as I used it to compile a list of recent tagged articles for Saskatchewan, so could use it to find those in Category Saskatchewan and Category Deletion as well. ... as Saskatchewan is quite unique for a word. How are you doing? You are still very busy on wikipedia! 'Tis getting time to get the February newsletter as the end of month is rolling around too fast this time. On a side note...with the leap year, met someone getting married on the last day, which will make their anniversaries very interesting. Kind Regards Julia +" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. See the mess I've created or let's have banter " +" April 2006 (UTC) Unless I am very much mistaken, you (and ,many other Wiki administrators in many places) are using the Wikipedia epithet 'POV' to mean MiPOV (Minority Point of View), and 'NPOV' ('Neutral Point of View') as MaPOV/MaiPOV (Majority/Mainstream Point of View). Is there a mechanism at Wikipedia whereby we can even establish what is the MaPOV? ""You are old, father William,"" the young man said, ""And your hair has become very white; And yet you incessantly stand on your head Do you think, at your age, it is right? 19:03, 18" +Collaborative Real time editor I note your points. I have quoted WP:NOT at the top of the article to remind people, and expanded the main article so it is not anymore merely a list. As it is a bleeding edge area some of the projects (eg Synchroedit) would not qualify for their own articles on grounds of notability (unless there are notability criteria for software research, if so please let me know) They are however relevant in the context of a young, dynamic field. I have therefore left them as external links not articles. The page has been self regulating for a year now (although I hadn't signed up for a Wikipedia account, I was contributing to it). When projects die (as for instance Chalks did) what we do is mark it as 'discontinued' for a few months, and if no-one challenges it, we then delete the link. If you would prefer articles were created for any of the projects currently listed as external links, then please could you let us know which ones, rather than deleting them. A small band of regulars have been carefully building up this list over time, and its a bit of a kick in the teeth to find some of the links suddenly deleted without warning. Thanks +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Danny Boy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk | Contribs) " +" Horrendous Inaccuracies I think there should be something in this article about how inaccurate conservapedia is. Just look at their article on England [England]: http://www.conservapedia.com/England It's just nonsense- Wales and Cornwall were ""independent Pictish kingdoms"" under Roman rule!!! The Picts were from Scotland; Wales and Cornwall, not to mention England, didn't even exist until after the Romans left; all of modern day England, Wales and Cornwall were under Roman rule. I wouldn't even say I had a great knowledge of history, but I know that much. If anyone had any other examples of ludicrous inacurracies in these sort of articles (ie not related to evolutin/ religion/ other typical conservative bugbears) could you post them here, along with any citations from newspapers or blogs pointing out inaccuracies. We should think about starting on a new section. " +What the **** is this ****? Wikipedia has reached an all new low. Why in the **** is Platinum reserved as a sub section now with only two paragraphs about it? Are you people that damn formal that you have to follow every f ucking rule to the teeth? This is an outrage. Do you have any suggestions for improvement, or are you just ranting? 2008 ) Oh I see, Wikipedia gets to shit in our Wheaties with these policies, yet you guyds get free reign to bastardize articles to your liking? Oh I know, why not combine ALL pokemon games onto one page. Oh yeah, that reaaallly helps out, doesn't it? +a clear case of WP:POINT. 76.65.142.33 +...but evolution did produce polio. talk +Yes and you Indian users have been supporting editors such as Dewan I will eventually undo all his trashy edits but untill then enjoy your position because the Pro indian POV will be removed 86.158.237.68 +You made some tough-sounding talk about how bad-assed you are and then you backed out with your tail between your legs. Then you defaced my talk page while demanding that I not reply on yours. You're both a liar and a hypocrite, and I've taken down a dozen like you. Steer clear of Bullshido from now on; we don't appreciate fakes and liars. +" Chipper Jones The Chipper Jones article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. '''''' (Talk) " +RE adding (d): on Controversy: Controversy is a perfectly neutral and encyclopedic word, you write. Could you please clarify that? To me it is a journalistic word first: arousing and news-suggesting, but not encyclopidical. Suggest rv because of (a,b,c,d) - +I am not sure the reason for your current block, would know the reason for that. +Raptor Jesus Raptor Jesus is the prophet of the internets and has come to us to enlighten us about the gospel. +Just asking why? It wasn't even as much detail as I could have gone into... +Ascension Ancestral's Battle for Wesnoth Addon This is a test page to track the progress of Ancestral's new addon for Battle for Wesnoth. +" (outdent) No, you do not seem to understand that merging is an editorial function, independent of deletion. As most of the information in this article is in the article Tim Russert, this is duplication, and it should be deleted and redirected (essentially the same thing as a merge). '''''' (talk) " +" Updates to page Since the page is protected ""No. of episode"" on the right needs to be updated from 46 to 48, and in the header, the statement ""A fourth season has been confirmed, with its premier unknown"" needs to be updated to ""A fourth season has been confirmed, with its premier to air on June 23, 2014"" (more info on the Episodes page)." +A In a wooden boat, apart perhaps from the garboard (the strake alongside the keel) you don't caulk clinker planking. The lands (overlaps between adjoning strakes) must be made carefully at the correct angle, which varies constantly anlong its length. The rivets hold the strakes together and the lands should seal themselves when the boat becomes wet in use. If the building job has not been done well enough for this to happen, you are in trouble. In case someone does not know what a strake is; a plank is not quite the same thing as a strake but gives the general idea. Caulking an iron vessel is done quite differently from the method in a wooden one and I suspect that this was done, though I have no direct experience of it. ( ) +"To whoever changed the phrase ""unit level wargame"" to ""squad level wargame"", note that in this game, one controls units independently of each other, even members of the same squad. This is different to a squad level wargame such as Advance Wars, or on the tabletop, regular Warhammer 40,000, where the squad is the smallest atomic unit, rather than the individual soldier. Therefore this is a unit level wargame." +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Grizzly bear, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Drmiesmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! " +military of cape verde could you please put an edit on the Military of Cape Verde i don't know russian equipment i know that amilcar cabral had visited russia like 3/4 times but i don't know i heard english poeple on TV saying russia is shit cold but yeah they had the coldwar ( ) +" I think that saying that nobody has a problem with VK except John is hyperbole. I had (and continue to have) a problem with VK seeming not to be able to take advice or rational guidance from other Wikipedians and being offensive when he ""reasons"" his point of view. Sorry for butting in but I have to call it like it is. What's the point of being on probation if the probationer is unwilling to learn from past mistakes of behaviour?...(kiwiexile at DMOZ) • " +":::I have the complete set of ""I, C"" on VHS, and books too. ) " +Belay my last. I'm leaving Unibody in with monocoque because I'm not sure it's not applicable now... +" WP:DYK Please read DYK guide carefully: ""The article that will be listed ON THE TOP of the template should have a fitting and appropriate image attached"". Please make necessary changes. Cheers, -трёп- " +Support per nom; I've just come from the Korean maritime border incidents page; the Blue Crab they are talking about isn't this one. +" Mediation You may interested in this mediation as you were an active participant when this was on WP:NPOVN.'''''' talk " +You give me a lot of final warnings +Why do not the two of you, the mentally retarded Jennygirl and the omnipotent Richie Rich, go together to Harrods and dont forget to choose together, being an authentically healthy and sociable couple, time and location, maybe a restaurant,and then enjoy very evidentliy your meal and in case you should discover that you cant pay anymore, then do not expect them to let one of you peel the potatoes in return. Maybe they wont even say Hello when you come back after they would be kicking off your dipshit spinning incapable ass from the central perk. What a pity. Receive all my sympathy at one time. Enjoy yourselves and your longest sentence Johnny-come-lately the one and only programme director. +" She may not have used those precise words, but she did say ""Toss it out and start over? Yes, because it's based on a false premise. Our health care system is based on the premise that health care is a commodity like VCRs or computers and that it should be distributed according to the ability to pay in the same way that consumer goods are. That's not what health care should be. Health care is a need; it's not a commodity, and it should be distributed according to need. If you're very sick, you should have a lot of it. If you're not sick, you shouldn't have a lot of it."" I think the editor who added that line to the article summarised the position in that way. Smmarising the long piece as ""incremental changes in a free-market system are ""doomed to fail"" does not seem inacurate to me because she is calling for wholesale reform and stating that free market principles should not apply. You may or may not agree with that, but that is what she is arguing. I do not think you should delete it but if needed add a fuller quote. " +Thank You Thanks, Ed. I did not realise that. Honestly, it is very hard to play by the rules when there are none! Cheerio, 217.44.9.134 +OpenFuture whose real name is Martin Rundkvist does not dare to attack me in academical symposiums with a lot of other scholars. Only when he is anonymous. Of that reason I had to reveal him here. We were both at an international symposium about Gotlandic Picture stones at the Swedish Heritage Board in September and he did not dare to comment on me when I spoke. He knew it was the wrong forum where I was highly regarded as the undisputed Gotlandic historian. +Noting that it wasn't I who self-reverted... +Oh, and it's not novel at all: List of Roman Catholics +" This is a statement regarding your block. First of all, I am the one who has been Wikipedia stalked for over one year now by none other than Delicious Carbuncle, who gave messages through her edits. She followed every single edit and deleted EVERYTHING. She is Pauline Berry and I can provide her IP address if you do not believe me. She has been too obvious for everyone. I am not accusing her, I have disproved her already with facts. She has absolutely and completely supported and defended the William Travilla exhibition fraud which we exposed to the public as being a 100% criminal fraud. She edited out the facts on the William Travilla page, added links to her friend's website, which is also a commercial website, Melinda Mason who sold copyright infringed DVD's on eBay. Next stopthe VANITY FAIR hoax. Delicious Carbuncle started a Wikipedia page for Millington Conroy, after I exposed him for being a forger who fooled the magazine with his fakes. I am being blocked for telling the truth? Delicious Carbuncle is defaming me on her page, you did not see this? She claims that her interest is not focused on Marilyn Monroe and or memorabilia? Her edits are telling a different story. Next the Name of the Rose. She followed me twice now into that one. I was shooting 14 days for this movie and my part was 'Jorge's Novice and that was named after the monks, who most of them did not have a speaking part at all. Pauline Berry aka Delicious Carbuncle aka 'Restawhile' followed me to Wikipedia (since she has Internet stalked me for the past three yearssince she is financed by none other than Mark Roesler, one of the defendants in the biggest exhibition fraud in history.) I am pointing out the facts here. She is having a speedy deletion fest and she acts as if she is in charge of running the show. She is not. She cannot turn 100% costume fabrications into original Marilyn Monroe worn costumes, and she tried on her blogs to make sense, because she is part of the project and she is making money off of that fraud. Now you may think that this edit by Delicious Carbuncle is just 'coincidence' or has nothing to do with Pauline Berry, but until we do not find out who truly is behind Delicious Carbuncle I would ask for fairness in this case and I am asking you to also block this person who has been publicly slandering me, with false accusations, with hypocrite statements and simply with lies. Now I am aware of the fact that they are working in high numbers, and that it is possible that you, blueboy are part of the group who are supporting a mean and sick fraud project which is out and created solely to defraud the paying public with some foolish fabrications. Delicious Carbuncle's edit which is a message to Ernest W. Cunningham and Jennifer J. Dickinson. You be the judge if this is just 'coincidence.' Please be fair and also block Delicious Carbuncle from further edits. You, Blueboy96 state this one: 'True or not, attempting to out another user is beyond unacceptable. Indefblocked. Blueboy96' Did you look at Delicious Carbuncle and realize what this person is doing there?! This edit was posted on Delicious Carbuncle's site and once she realized that she gave herself away, she edited over it, yet I saved it on time. You have to know that I called up Mrs. Pauline Berry in order to ask her to stop stalking me and to stop supporting one fraud after another. She is a 45 year old musician who also does try Marilyn Monroe imitations from time to time. She asked me years ago for my opinion as an expert on some Marilyn Monroe autographs and I gave he my honest opinion and told her right away that the signed photographs she claimed to have purchased were 100% fakes. She did not take that too well and ever since she is referring to me a 'self proclaimed expert,' she has spent years now on her hateful postings, websites filled with character assassination attempts, comparing me to murderers Charles Manson and John Lennon killer Mark Chapman. Pauline Berry is supporting people who used AIDS infected blood within their intimidation emails and threats. Who threatened to come to my home and burglarize me, harm me, tie me onto a chair and steal my collection. Pauline Berry has been a big part on the public defamation on three people. Please read the edits of Delicious Carbuncle and see the message. She is referring to my calls to her home, when I attempted to find out why she is supporting criminals. Who else would this be, instead of Pauline Berry, since only she knew at the time, that I actually called?! * 16:20, 28 March 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:64.236.80.62‎ (Caution: Vandalism on Peaches Geldof.) (top) * 16:18, 28 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m Peaches +you are joking, right ? +" Hi, thank you for your edit to Excommunication, but i am going to revert the change. the reason why is that your movement of these words did change the meaning to something that is not, in my opinion, as factually accurate. it is possible that the vast majority of modern Mennonites do not consider ""The Ban"", in and of itself, to be a pathological malpractice of church discipline, but the particular extreme application of it (that breaks up families, etc.) to be pathological. Feel free to discuss this on the talk page or below, if you want. " +Thanks for the link. I had seen am English language summary of women who were kept/guarded by relatives, a husband, etc. but can't find it again. +May 8th 2006 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +Yeah we're eagerly awaiting the bot. +Scott MacRae Scott MacRae is the nicest guy ever. He is well known for being a mad Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C fan. +Actually, Imax80, those 1988 copies of Dumbo & The Sword in the Stone are really from January 5, 1988 'cause 1. That was the 1st 1988 release date. 2. There were 1988 VHS, such as Walt Disney Mini Classics: The Wind in the Willows, Walt Disney Cartoon Classics: Special Edition & the 1988 print of Disney Sing Along Songs: You Can Fly! were released on that day. Same thing with your Lady & the Tramp VHS. That copy of Alice in Wonderland that has the 1984 FBI warnings slideshow, instead of fading, is from October 13, 1987 'cause I have a VHS Walt Disney Cartoon Classics: vol.9: Starring Chip 'n' Dale released on the same day & has that thing too. +:The Nature of 22-Pistepirkko A tag has been placed on The Nature of 22-Pistepirkko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (aeropagitica) +do you know who else believed in censorship? Adolf Hitler, you fucking facist. +The article did include his real name and it is Steven Mitchell. The online article was edited on 19 November 2014 and the name mysteriously disappeared. However, the Internet Archive version remains the same , and the version in the Infotrac datbase remains as a copy of the print version, and it clearly states his name (which is Steven Mitchell). Printed copies in libraries remain as they were printed. This is corroborated by the London Gazette medals and books on the B20 patrol. +Fool So what it doesn't need to go there because i don't want administrators knowing that needs to be deleted. +Dreadstar, LittleMountain5 and some jerk on the internet are jokes +" FAR {{#if:| for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Delist"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. " +Response: Thank you for posting on my talk page Captain, where I will tell you my honest opinion: In my opinion, you and Isotope and Feldspar and Transfinite and others are doing damage control for industry regarding Sweetest Day. Please stop removing neutral sourced factual information from the Sweetest Day article. Thank you. +" Probably not something that I should get involved with, given that I'd previously declined to restore Alakzi's talkpage access after a conversation on UTRS (there's no way you or Ritchie could have known that, though).  雲水 " +" Support I object to the full honorific title. Alfred Tennyson is fine. You can add the rest somewhere in the intro if needed. Shorter names are 'real world' I agree and 'most recognisable'. Also agree about ""Not Allowed"" being waved about like a cudgel. It seems like shouting. " +Old Text: and involved the experiments conducted by Gilles-Eric Séralini; the results were widely criticised by the scientific community Proposed New Text: and involved the experiments conducted by Gilles-Eric Séralini; the results were both supported and criticised by different sections of the scientific community +citation Carrot Top's father was on the new I've Got A Secret (his secret was that he was Carrot Top's father), and his intro revealed his former NASA line of work - If someone wants to figure out how to properly cite that, I couldn't figure out a convenient way +Actually, I will be. Douche +Re: Teknoman to Tekkaman Blade! Let's make a drive to change Teknoman to Tekkaman Blade. It's correct name of the series. The DVDs will soone be coming out for it. I see no reason why we shouldn't change everything to Tekkaman Blade. All the lists of the changes are there. Also, if the character sections get big enough they should probably get there own pages or go into a separate list page.Dangerous-Boy +Completely biased article This article is completely biased in favor of snow avalanches. Article rock avalanche redirects to this page so there should be far more than passing mention of them. +" ""Vandalism"" Why do you consider it vandalism? They are facts, as shown on my edit summary. John McDarekkson" +I assume your response means you are not an admin. As I have said to the other party involved, you are promoting a very unfriendly wikipedia. Accidentally changing one number in a year, or one word (when an inexperienced user thinks they are in sandbox) is not vandalism. As a representative of wikipedia, you should be nicer to users. If you feel this is vandalism, you should report it to an admin, not act on it yourself. +Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.165.20 +Latinos Unidos Hi, I would just like to know if you can please help me with these two maricons. What originally started as me trying to help a misinformed person about who Latinos are has turned into a verbal war and I feel like I'm being ganged up on by these two when I was only originally trying to help. And then when I tried to fully explain the concept of Latino to this individual, I was further repaid with another warning. The comments are on both of their user pages User talk:Jeffpw and User talk:Iamandrewrice, aswell as my own. +Ok.... so from the POV of Baha making a grab for power, he tried to establish himself within the Babi movement. I still don't see how you can say its odd or in anyway contradictory for him to do so. Anyway, you obviously feel very passionate about this and its not really worth arguing about (ie - if you really feel it has to be in there okay...). I just feel its a complete tangeant to the flow of the article that goes nowhere. 15:44, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) +Miller Genuine Draft This should have it's own page. Lite and Budweiser have one, and so should this. Having it redirect to Miller Corporate is stupid. I just dont know how to do it. If someone lets me know how, I will be happy to do it. +What I would like to know is what the theoretical speed is. Is it a gigabit or a gibibit? And on what layer does it transport that ammount of data? That is, are the ethernet header, CRC and preamble (and anything I forgot) included in the 1 gigabit, or can you send 1 gigabit/s on top of them? So what is the theoretical maximum bytes/s over raw ethernet (so not even using IP) that could be send then? +" Wikipedia's Stephan Schulz Referring to here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raylopez99 Italic text and this quote here: ""I'll warn or block any user I see who persists in such comments, although I have to say that I rarely have seen such incoherent aggression before."" this shows me one of two things: (1) you are prone to making aggrandizing statements like ""although I have to say that I rarely have seen such incoherent aggression before"", which begs the question about what was ""incoherent"" about my statement to this person, or, (2) you are very inexperienced about human interaction. Either way, you're probably not the best person to be moderating Wikipedia. I understand Wikipedia, being unpaid, is facing a crisis in finding competent administrators. Shame, since the current administrators seem to be ruining it for everybody. Worse, you have failed to read this section, that you cite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CIVIL#Assume_good_faith Now ask yourselftelling an administrator like William, who has been voted out by the Wikipedia committee as an administrator (due to his censoring activities and apparent bias towards the Global Warming cause, as has been exposed in the online mainstream media) that he should not censor any of my comments about his censorship about a particular article on the Wiki page that he censoredis clearly ""good faith"". In fact, it goes to the very issue of the article under consideration. How is that not good faith? You perhaps were offended by the rhetorical ""twist the knife"" remark I made, but that's small beer. Nuff said. I'm not going to make a mountain out of a molehill, but this is another example of why Wikipedia has gone downhill, and now is just a shadow of it's former self and potential. Have a nice day. " +someone might want to check out what i've been adding and the fact that has been rep[eadetly deleting all this information today +"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Saudi Arabia women's national football team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) I have undertaken a slight copy-edit of the article. Other than that, I have no concerns with the article and will pass it as a good article. A most interesting piece of work which I much appreciated reading. (talk) " +AA9Skillz AA9Skillz is one o the best editors in Wikipedia History , despite personal attacks from a user called Mr Vernon he has strided on in to the Pages of History. +Eh..Sometimes I'm nervous..And just..I'm moody, so you no block me? Please, I understood my mistake.. Alden or talk with Alden +" Requested move 29 December 2015 :Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah → – ""sayyed"" is an honorific, which should not be used in article names (per WP:HONORIFIC). The article was recently renamed without consensus to include the honorific, with an unsupported claim that 'sayyed' is actually part of his name, and not an honorific, a claim which is contradicted in the lead. " +Congratulations on getting halfway through Smiths! I can't say I am relishing dealing with Kilburn & Rippey and Steyn when I get back. But this bad weather is no good — hopefully it will have settled down by the time I get back! +You do NOT get to use your talk page, or any other page, to attack other editors. -restored by ME-71.174.142.108 +Fat mess Everyone dispises you. +@your little brother the Yank - burning the Quran or pissing on it does not bother anyone Son, it does not. Child. It is a trick, a trap that you walked into. Idiot. Faith is not about books, they just fake the anger to beat your sweet red ass...Yank...Ruler of the World....Clown...:) Make some movies...Yeah..make some movies...idiot. +" A barnstar for you! The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar This is not just a ""You gave me barnstar, I give you one"" kind of thing, but I think you really deserve one for all your anti-vandalism work. Keep it up! ^.^ Ibn-La'Ahad " +" Hello Jimbo You don't know me, but I am very familiar with you. I will reveal my identity in due course, but for now it is not relevant. I put it to you that we have ""issues"" that must be sorted out ASAP. Hence if you could get back to me here with a suggestion for where we can chat in private, we can allow our discussions to progress. Please do not ignore this message. 79.67.240.73 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.169.188 " +... perhaps your school would be better off teaching more English grammer and less history, just a thought... btw, not everyone is glad he was stopped...58.107.179.146 +" Polishing a ""featured article"" What's the ancient Greek theory of the precession of the equinox doing in a 2012 article? How about what the Maya actual wrote in the Dresden Codex? If you are going with this, maybe get some facts right: Astronomical fact; The Sun appears to move through thirteen constellations each year. The December solstice is in Ophiuchus, the actual archetype of the New Age, you know ""drugs, sex and rock 'n' roll"" or hip hop if you prefer. Now if you are truly intent on hiding the actual astronomy and astrology behind 2012, then by all means, ignore this post. Or better yet, act like Jenkins, steal the data and pretend that you discovered it. Hahhahhahahahhahahahaha. Love you guys! ~*~ Mardyks 68.35.28.79 " +editing Korean articles Please note editing without valid sources or reference will result in reverting and it shows how unprofessional you are, don't be an idiot.Korsentry +" Then you should know that the ""Lady Hope"" story you referenced (Darwin denying evolution) is a complete and utter lie. Even Answersingenesis.org says not to use it. So why did you use it? - " +62.158.76.7 UNPRODECT AND I WILL LEAVE YOU!!!! +" All that needs to happen is that we don't throw too much focus on the date, perhaps try and get an original cite for it, and make sure it's labeled as ""speculative."" Thank you. That was already done, however some power tripping admins saw an end to it. Pity, eh? " +20 moments where e.g. or i.e. is used in an article that prints out to 40 pages is not excessive in my book, and I don't see how they interrupt flow. +I also agree, I used to get fatalites and casualties mixed up myself. +" Me too. The article was taken from 197K to 33K, with edit summaries like (in a later attempt) ""The Almohad empire has been removed.Because it was not so important in Islamic history."" All timelines etc were removed. The article may be too long, but this is not the way to do it. I'm far from sure that the claim ""And obviously improved the writing"" is justified. " +I don't know you from a whole inthe ground. I revert edits that disservice our readers. If you don;t want tobe reverted, don't make those kinds of edits. Pay less attention to the rule book and more attention to what will help the readers. +I have a copy of Goldacre on the shelf; happy to check any specific wording... +" Articles for creation: PeerJ Computer Science Thank you for the suggestions on adding more references to satisfy the academic journal notability guidelines. Have added the indexing service DBLP which indexes all major or important computer science journals. In addition to the OCLC indexing service (see infobox), this should satisfy ""criteria 1"" of the notability guidelines. Additionally, several other independent references have been added. " +I'm Jim,a retarded idiot . +Is it possible to talk to you via email? +Please stop your wiki-stalking of me. I have better things to do than taking part in this childish and unproductive game. I have explained why I used a particular rationale for a particular reversion in the past. I don't see any reason to continue a discussion on that or your previous reverts of that article. You should be satisfied that the information you wanted to include was eventually included in a more appropriate form, that you accepted, and move on instead of beating the dead horse. There are thousands of articles waiting to be written. I routinely revert comments that are threatening or harassing in nature at my talk page. Revert threatening comments on my own talk page is not an attack on you. +" TV.coms article on him states ghanian and sierra leone http://www.nndb.com/people/335/000111002/ Its likely when asked where his father was from he stated ""sierra"" and the interviewer misheard" +" Requested move :Forrest Gump → Forrest Gump (disambiguation) — The novel is clearly unique original use, and all other uses are derivative works. Novel should be main article. Add hatnote {{about|novel}} to final Forrest Gump. ₪— (T·C) "" Forrest Gump (novel) → Forrest Gump Forrest Gump (novel) → [[#REDIRECT Forrest Gump]]" +Oh, hey, Blackguard! This isn't my first edit to Wikipedia, you know. Remember me? I vexed you a few weeks ago. I'm back, baby, I am BACK. +I have added this info - which you could have done yourself with ten minutes research. I have also (again) removed the claim that Michael now lives in Romania. He doesn't, he lives in Geneva, although he makes regular appearances in Romania. See the semi-official website. +Why is reference 8 a reliable source? +Shoessss licks the assholes of the above +You blocked me yet? D +The 1st link, if you search their episode guide, has incomplete information from the first two years. G4 has done a poor job of keeping ANY of their episode guides in order and up-to-date. Don't believe me, compare TVRage's to theirs. 2nd link is a listing on Amazon.com. I'd give you credit if it were the book published online, but it's not. And if you don't take it down, I'll report it for being an obvious ad. The 3rd is an inaccurate and incomplete list, that's been haphazzardly copied from the original source that G4 got rid of because of its bugs, and pasted onto a Morgan Webb obsession site. If this is the best you got, you can give up now. 14:49, 16 October 2006 +What has he done as an activist besides write the 3 books? Nothing else is mentioned in the article. +HLQall of these things happen to be lies so go fuck yourself and die lol jk D +This new 'cover' is a fake as well. It is not 'timberland'. Isn't there a promo cover that can be used? +" You really don't seem to have got the hang of WP:NPOV/FAQ policy, and are advised to follow it carefully. Oh, and blanking your talk page is your right but it isn't impressive. . , talk I blanked the page because there was a lot of unnecessary old stuff on it. I know the NPOV extremely well and I'm always fighting against the EXTREME POV of Evolutionists. The stuff I changed on Flood Geology is an example of extreme evolutionary POV. I changed it to reflect reality. Problem is, most Eovlutionists are completely unable to see their own POV. And most of the editors of Flood Geology are not geologists. I am an undergrad paleontologist. Stop edit warring please Stop edit warring on Flood geology to insert fringe claims, or you will be blocked. Please read WP:3RR, too. | talk . This topic is about a fringe belief so it ought to accurately reflect what flood geologists actually say. But it is nonsense and full of misinformation and outright lies. Not one of the editors defending the Evolutionary faith are geologists. They just keep repeating the same nonsense debunked by creationists ages ago. The topic is about a fringe belief, so it ought to be written from a fringe point of view..? No, that's a mistake. For the amount of attention, and kind of attention, that is appropriate to what creationists have or have not ""debunked"", see WP:UNDUE. Try to take Wikipedia policies on board, or you will find yourself blocked. | talk . I didn't say ""written from a fringe POV"" I said it should reflect what flood geologists actually say, not what enemies says they say. There is a big difference. If critics wish to comment on what flood geologists actually say, fine. But at least the actual position of flood geologists should be accurately presented. As written, the page is deeply flawed and pushes a single POV. The problem is that most evolutionists are totally ignorant of and blind to their POV pushing. They actually think that they have no bias!! I am very familiar with WP policies, which I why I'm trying to get fair hearing instead of the deeply biased presentations currently on WP. You're misrepresenting your edits.The reason I warn you against edit warring is that you have recently reverted three times, within a short period of time, to insert one and the same change to the article: from ""This was interpreted as being the result of massive flooding, though it is now known that they are the product of ice age glaciations (an unknown phenomenon at that time)"" to ""This was interpreted as being the result of massive flooding, though it is now interpreted as the product of ice age glaciations (an unknown phenomenon at that time)."" And you say that change is about ""the actual position of flood geologists""? No it isn't. You're changing, over and over, the description of the position of mainstream science. That's the exact opposite of what you claim to be doing. If you're ""very familiar with WP policies"", I have to suppose you simply don't like them. I'm afraid I'm going to enforce them just the same: don't edit war any more, on this or any other article, or I will block you. | talk . And you honestly don't see the POV in ""known"" versus ""interpreted""? Good grief. You could say ""generally interpreted"", ""almost always interepreted"" or possibly someting like ""the current consensus is that it is"" and they would all probably be acceptable. Consensus is an opinion. Present it as fact and you are pushing POV. Unfortunately majority POV is generally accepted as no POV on WP. That is a serious flaw, and a significant hit to WP's credibility. Also, it take at least two to edit war. It does no good to cry ""foul"" when another editor is as determined as you are over a differnce. Flood Geology Request for Comment There is a RfC on Talk:Flood geology regarding a statement in the lead of the article. I don't know if you watchlist this article, but your input would be appreciated. Weight I know you think the scientific community is wrong, but please re +" Plagiarism? This source, which is from Medieval Italy: an Encyclopedia,"" ed. Christopher Kleinhenz, has been plagiarized, or nearly so, in a version of this article. Take this old version of the article as a reference point, and compare the following (emphasis added by me): Dionigi di Borgo San Sepolcro (born circa 1300, died 1342) was from Sansepolcro near Arezzo. (Wikipedia) Dionigi (c. 1300–1342) was born in Sansepolcro, near Arezzo. (Medieval Italy) He was an Augustinian scholar of very keen intellect and was much sympathetic towards others. (Wikipedia) He entered the Augustinian order at a young age and immediately distinguished himself by his keen intellect and piety. (Medieval Italy) Dionigi was a scholar trained as an astrologer in Sorbonne as well as a theologian. He received his doctorate circa 1324. (Wikipedia) He studied theology at the Sorbonne in Paris and received his doctorate c. 1324. (Medieval Italy) One of Dionigi's works (which since has been lost) is his commentary (circa 1339–1342) on Valerius Maximus’s Factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri. (Wikipedia) Almost all of Dionigi’s own writing has been lost. His most famous work is his commentary (probably c. 1339–1342) on Valerius Maximus’s Factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri. (Medieval Italy) It became a template for subsequent commentaries on Valerius Maximus and also for several of Boccaccio’s reference works such as Esposizioni and Genealogia deorum gentilium. (Wikipedia) This commentary, with its many citations of classical authors, became a template not only for subsequent commentaries on Valerius Maximus but also for several of Boccaccio’s nonfictional works, such as Esposizioni and Genealogia deorum gentilium. (Medieval Italy) Another of Dionigi’s writings is a commentary on the first book of the Sententiae (a treatise on logic) and still another is a commentary on the pseudo Aristotelian Oeconomia'. (Wikipedia) Dionigi’s other writings include a commentary on the first book of the Sententiae, a treatise on logic, and a commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian Oeconomia. (Medieval Italy'') And that's just the first two paragraphs of that version of the WP article. In my opinion, this is a clear-cut case of plagiarism and a violation of copyright. Some of this remains in the article, some has been altered; but there's obviously a larger concern of whether there are other instances of plagiarism in the article. I'm not sure how to proceed. " +Saying that this organization promotes obesity is like saying Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. promoted being black or Cesar Chavez promoted being hispanic. +" It is not possible to ""personally"" attack an anonymous IP address, especially one which ironically claims a well-known national comic strip (also cited in various other places in wikipedia) is ""inconsequential"". " +, you seem like a thoroughly pleasant chap. [http +Shut up you fucking loser. Get a life you fat fuck. ```` +Are you still 12 years old? +" It's really rather sad That I can ask an otherwise legitimate question on a talk page like this, but because one person does not like the way I phrased it, it is suddenly ""vandalism"" and deleted completely. If anything, you could say I was rude in the way I asked my question, but as far as I can tell, vandalism = intentionally disruptive edits, and, more importantly, edits to actual articles. These talk pages are intended to talk, are they not? The standards of writing something in an encyclopedic manner do not apply here. At least from my understanding. But even if they do, assuming that my post was solely created as a vandalism, when I was asking an otherwise legitimate question, is completely unnecessary. Or are those policies such as ""WP:Assume Good Faith"" or whatever all for show after all? Seems very seldom that people actually do assume good faith around here. They're just as happy to tag anything they don't like as vandalism, even more so if the person posting it isn't a regular. I dunno, just a few observations. I'll admit that I don't edit here often, so if I've somehow missed something that somehow changes the situation completely, feel free to let me know. 98.208.65.56 " +"==GA Reassessment== :This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Calvin and Hobbes/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. I feel doubtful that this article still meets the GAC. First of all, it fails 2b because a) there are {{Citation needed}} tags in the ""Style and influences"" and ""Books"" sections and b) according to a maintenance tag (which has been in the article since March), there are primary sources throughout the article. GAs should have neither unsourced information nor primary sources. Anyway, that's my review. (Push to talk) " +br> (after I read the files) +" Well others might not be reliable as you said, but The Economic Times is a highly reliable source and so is NDTV and the gross figures is from all versions. (Ping Back) " +" News & rumors: Alternate timelines / Uhura Quote: ""Actress Zoe Saldana (Haven) has reportedly been offered the role of USS Enterprise communications officer Lieutenant Uhura in JJ Abrams' ""Star Trek"" movie. [via IGN] According to TrekMovie, ""the deal is not yet final and one outstanding issue may be related to her schedule starring in the James Cameron sci-fi mega movie 'Avatar' which is still in production. Sources indicate that 'Avatar' will be doing location shooting starting in October and 'Star Trek' is slated to start shooting in November."" The site points out that Saldana has a connection to J.J. Abrams ""as she was in two episodes in the recent ABC series 'Six Degrees' produced by Abrams and fellow 'Star Trek' producer Bryan Burk."" Meanwhile, AICN claims that the plot for the new ""Trek"" film deals with alternate timelines. A group of Romulans will reportedly go back in time to kill off James T. Kirk, and the elder Spock must do what he can to prevent that incident and change the timelines back."" (from http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=5620&count;=0) " +" File:1418935413 697ea4bd23.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1418935413 697ea4bd23.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. '''''' (TALK) " +Hey Fuck u bitch...i dont suck nuts \, linkin park does! +" Cattle Chosen Also, the ""fact that the cattle chose the location"" of Cattle Chosen is stretching the truth somewhat. John Garrett Bussell chose the location after thoroughly exploring the area. A cow (named Yulika) went missing from their old location on the Blackwood River shortly before they relocated. They assumed the cow was lost forever, but it turned up at their new location shortly after they did. The point of the name was that the cow had wandered off because the feed at their old location was poor, and had ended up at their new location because the feed was better. | Talk " +, especially as concerns WP:BLP +More like holohoax amirite? 213.235.6.109 +" I prefer Maculism (or ""masculinism"" even more) over Men's Rights. Masculinism is broader and includes ""men's issues"" (which may not be directly related to legal rights per se) such as unfair cultural expectations and biases against men. " +" Image:Robert Wadlow.jpg Jeffrey, please stop tagging my images for no reason, everytime claiming there is no ""source"".First you tagged the Image:Guinness World Records 2007.jpg because it had no source, even though it was obviously a photoscan you idiot. And you tagged the Image:Robert Wadlow.jpg because it had no source.Did you read the template??.The copyright status can not be determined, so it defeats the whole point of putting a source.And look at the Category for similiar image , most images like that don't have a source either, ok. " +How in the Hell was that an inappropriate discussion? I apologized to him, for Chrissakes (and I was formal)! +Ip vandal Hi, I see you are an experienced user. I'm helping to revert vandalism on wikipedia, and just as I was going to warn an Ip vandal. Something came up called an edit conflict, and a completely different edit appeared on the page, can you explain it to me? +Regarding edits made during December 28 2006 (UTC) to Bret Hart Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. talk " +He got what he deserved for ruining Wikipedia with his so-called 'abuse filter'. +REDIRECT Talk:Hayes & Harlington railway station +Jaime Foxx Show Did Kandi Burruss play on the Jaime Foxx show for awhile? +Shall I add the question mark or can you simply imagine one in your sympathetic brain? +Later, currently I'm off wiki for a while... +" No longer tor Query me! " +Don't even THINK of fucking with my entries again unless you want a bat to the knees! +More updates for you to take care of Queensland police are advising that the following roads are closed or flooded:http://www.facebook.com/notes/queensland-police-service/flood-waters-continue-to-rise-and-cut-off-streets-around-brisbane/159680534079967 Merivale Street & Glenelg Streets at South Brisbane Orleigh Sreet & Morry Street at West End Abbottsford Road at Bowen Hills Burrows Street at Bowen Hills Eagle Street in City Coronation Drive at Milton Queens Wharf at Gradens Point and along river near QUT Walk ways around New Farm Park Annie Street & Haig Street at Milton Many parts of Oxley including Ipswich Road near Oxley Flats Granard Road at Beaudesert Westlake area is under threat of serious flooding as the river has broken its banks. Since you deleted the page I was working on, I'm sure you'll know where this has to go. +Hey, its ok I love that word too!!!! +He wrote two operas one early (1934, withdrawn, a comic opera Tom and Lily, though I know nothing about it) and then of course the one-act chamber opera What Next (1998). Seems like an appropriate name. (talk) +can't even open it on the blackberry. Too big. +Removal of relevant links and content to a page Hi Samuel I have edited a couple of pages here and it would seem one is being confused with some sort of spam because of external linking that is on the page. The page relates to serviced offices and has been edited becuase of links. Sometimes that page itself has been removed. I have added four links to the bottom of the page that provide a referance to revelant oragnisations. This is NOT promotional linking and i am now very perplexed as it seems ok for other people to put other pages up and provide relevanmt links. Please feel free to browse to 'serviced office' and let me know why these links are wrong. my email address is nrie5@hotmail.com thank you. Neil. +You are right that I haven't read the judgement. That is because I have a full-time job which does not involve the law, and Wikipedia is a hobby for me: i.e. I don't care to make the time for it. -) But that's the point: articles like this would be helpful for a layman if they summarize the most important issues of the case up front, which is what I suggested in the first place. As it is, the length and bearing of the article are discouraging for someone who is not a lawyer or law student. I think Wikipedia policy is pretty clear in discouraging this approach. Unfortunately for me, I don't presently have the time to read the case text and write a decent summary of it, which is something that would be better done by a scholar of the work anyway. I can only urge you to do so and hope that you or another legal-minded Wikipedian will come to agree. Best of luck and keep up the good work! +The confusion arose because he didn't sign his post.220.253.222.146 +,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by ratio of carbon dioxide emissions to GDP per capita +User:Robintetley User seems to have realized he needs to discuss more and has imo expressed understanding of why he was blocked and that he won't repeat the behavior. So I said I would nudge an admin about possible early unblocking. I had the chance to point a few of the exact issues out and he has commented on his talkpage in an understanding way. User talk:Robintetley - I will leave it with you as to what to do as he hasn't actually made a new unblock request, thanks - +you should just die in a hole while the ideiot User:Cloverbeatme!! gets his guts pulled out +as I have with you. Godspeed. +"{| align=""center"" style=""border: 1px solid #000000; background-color: #FF0033"" cellpadding=10 |-align=center; | Natalya will be off relaxing from 18 July to 27 July, and may not respond swiftly to queries! |} " +DestructoBot kills all images regardless of their tags! +REDIRECT User talk:Quizimodo (usurped) +While Americans may have fumbled around a great deal since 1776, I don't think that there are many historians who would tell you 1776 was irrelevant to the development of democracy in the world. +January 2008 Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +I have replaced the initial version of the article with an alternate version emailed to me by Roger Sandilands. The original version was the same as what Sandilands submitted to American National Biography (and for which ANB holds the copyright). I deleted the original version to avoid a copyvio problem, and recreated the page with the alternate version. 05:05, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC) +"controversial? Why are they controversial? What is the controversy surrounding these aspects? I don't want an essay or anything, but a concise and detailed description of these questions' answers would be appreciated. See my recent comments at Talk:Stem cell controversy I see that your comments were posted closer to the start of the year and that you do actually now support the change of name but were wanting feedback from certain parties. Could you please inform us if there have been any major objections to the name change from the MCB Wikiproject. If not I will probably make the changes in the next few days. Also I would like to see something along the lines of ""It is important to note that the moral objections made regarding the use of Embryonic stem cells does not apply to the use of adult stem cells. The best known use of adult stem cells is probably bone marrow transplants. This is a good example of the type of work already being done in this field that has effective results."" I'm not saying this is the exact wording I would like to see, but something is absolutely required to differentiate these two very different methodologies. No comments have been left so I have made the required changes. I have also added a quote by Prof Ian Wilmut. Additions/changes to external links MOVED TO ITS OWN PAGE Funny things said by funny people Moved to WP:BJODN Wow...I'm...wow...speechless...wowowowow. I don't know what's worse...the content of this or the attrocious grammar/spelling. -'''' (talk, ) Amniotic fluid stem cells with the discovery of amniotic fluid stem cells should 3 major types be changed to 4? Also it might be nice to have a short section on them. Proposed external link - Stem Cells on PBS Stem Cell Gold Rush - KQED-TV, Video & Resources As per the page guidelines, I submit the above for inclusion Looks good to me. Random Question Hi. I am a rather biology noob, hopefully this question doesn't sound strange. I am curious as to whether it is possible for stem cell creation to one day reach a peak where we can replace animal Slaughterhouse? Forget about the economic factor for a minute. Is it theoretically possible to feed a nation with meat that was grown 100% in a lab and not killed from any animal?? I had a thought that animals would benefit greatly from this. Um, you could grow either stem cells or non-stem cells in some sort of cell culture system for food, I guess, but it seems like a hideously expensive exercise & you would likely use animal or animal-derived products in their growth. The problem would still be the texture and the flavour''. Realistically, it would be easier to feed everyone with soya flavoured to taste like meat. I've read that the entire underdeveloped world could be easily fed using the grain the US alone feeds its livestock (not sure if that's true though). Eating meat is costsly, and in vitro meat would be even moreso. The best way to save the animals would be to go vegetarian... but I still like a good steak. So you are saying there is never going to be an answer since taste and flavor can never be produced in a lab? Not never, just that I suspect that taste and flavour will be greater hurdles than growing cells. I don't see why it has to be stem cells that are grown as ""meat"" - actually you would be better off growing muscle cells, as it is the muscle (and some fat) that is what is in a typical steak. In this line: ""In the future, medical researchers anticipate being able to use technologies derived from stem cell research to treat a wider variety of diseases including cancer, parkinson's disease, spinal cord injuries, and muscle damage, amongst a number of other impairments and conditions."" NEWLIN +cmon, im waiting for ur cum over over all over this fucking website. fuck anonymous dissenter, ur not so anonymous cunttwat fucker +" The more I think about it, the more I think ""we"" is the right wording. The problem is that the object of the sentence is ""Penn"" and without knowing that he said, ""they"" you're expecting him to use a first person singular, not a first person plural. I think the reason it feels awkward is that when it undergoes the transformation from singular to plural it does become slightly more ambiguous, because ""we"" refers to a group of people, but only one that includes Penn, which means it's either Penn & Teller or the entire production staff of the show. When you go to ""they"", it could be any group of people, and because it doesn't say ""he"", you sort of need to think about what other possible groups Penn could be referring to. Obviously it only takes a few milliseconds to figure out what it means, but if you're reading along at full speed it can break the flow to have that happen. Regarding the colon wording (Penn said: ""the aim of the show is to ..""), I understand what is going for there, but I don't like the way it sounds in that paragraph. When you do it that way, it seems like a non-sequitur. When you have it the other way, it's clear that we, the editors of the encyclopedia, are trying to convey to the readers what the aim of the show is, and we're using Penn's words. When you just say that Penn said something, and the thing that he said is about the aim of the show, the role of that sentence in the paragraph becomes a bit more ambiguous, because it could be that we are trying to convey that this is how Penn thinks about the show, or that we're trying to convey something about Penn himself. I think the way it's written now and where the quote starts removes nearly all that ambiguity. But of course, I could be reading into things way too much. I think it feels natural with the ""we"" being included in the quote, but maybe has a better compromise wording that addresses my concerns about non-sequitur. [talk/contrib] " +I will edit as I see fit and remove things I find irrelevant as it is a free for all and freedom of opinion and speech so shut up. +Thank you for reacting. At this time two editors have supported the RFC, so if you are still inclined to make a contribution you are welcome. +" Lou Schalk calls it the ""12"" in the youtube video of the first flight. That's how that pilot nicknamed the aircraft. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7diDWBrTjr0 " +He gets the blame because he's inserted the word there twice already today. It should be changed back, in my opinion, as Santa is more legendary than fictional. The Grinch, while wholely fictional, seems to be becoming real. +" To whom it may concern in regards with laws, your actions are a direct violation of Privacy_laws_of_the_United_States, as well as Wiki rules. Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. In regards with discussions, this is NOT a place for arguments. In regards with encyclopedia style, the article needs to fit in it in order to stay in Wiki, and attempts to re-write it into another style do nothing but harm. In regards with the article factual sense, there is nothing to argue about. There is no evidence proving that nomads fight tested the dogs versus fighting them ""just for money"". Same applies to modern times. Not to mention that nomads did NOT develop the breed initially, because the breed was originally established by whoever was raising sheep or goats, while nomads were traveling, so they helped to spread it. As per fighting dogs of this breed in some countries, there is already a clear outline in this article already. However, there are factual materials that some of so-called ""fight test"" aimed to measure the aggression towards strange unfriendly dogs or other large predators entering protected premises. This applies to dogs of either gender. As well, there are several cases of successful re-introduction of dogs from kennels that run so-called ""fighting tests"" to livestock guardians duties, in different countries. As well, the free range farming is on the rise in Russia, and the livestock guardian dogs are in demand. The pit-like dogs, pit mixes and commercial fights is one thing; the necessity to maintain aggression towards predators to protect the herd from strays is a totally different issue. This needs to be sorted out to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings. " +Masturbation GraemeL, I was wondering if your edits are like a form of literary masturbation for you? I'm curious, have you had any success in your lifetime? I can on imagine a jealous perpetually failing loser could possibly be so particularly concerned with what rational people would agree is legitimate content simply because you are affraid of any association whatsoever with commercialism. Are you jealous, envious, or affraid of people who succeed? Maybe you'd be best to give up your life as a failure and join a commune, where you can spend your days feeling as equaly imcompeted as your fellow unsuccessful losers. At your commune, no one is superior and no one enjoys more success than others, therefore you don't have to feel ashamed of your lack of accomplishment. Do your edits make you feel important? Does your mommy or boyfriend control your life so much that you're only able to feel satisfaction in your life through the edits you demand? Enjoy yourself, Graemel. I'm sure you'll keep up your crusade like the predictible loser I know you must be. I'm going to stop further wasting my time with Wikipedia and go continue what I do best - which is to make money. Bye, bye, loser. +Well, from whats been presented, I gather that most scholors see the RD as a version of the Ten Commandments. Now, I don't need to argue that the 10C are notable. So, if scholars see the RD as a version of same, wouldn't you see that as notable. Mind you, you don't have to agree that its so for it to be notable. As to the AfD, how you send your time is your business. +Could I please be unblocked? +" "" The brand is hailed by guitarists worldwide as the most reputable brand of guitar manufacturing."" What nonsense is this?!" +" Anders biography. Alleged Repudiation of religion I removed the two sentences that claimed, ""according to at least one source, due to anders experience in space, he rejected his religious views"". Why. The contributor of the latter two sentences claimed as his only source a link to the UK guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/nov/30/apollo-8-mission . I have read that article 3 or 4 times. While this article is very interesting and fascinating, Nowhere in this article does it say that Anders rejected or questioned his own religion. furthermore, I could find no other sources that could possibly confirm the claim that Anders rejected or otherwise questioned the religion of his birth. " +Many thanks, it would be more than great if you haven't missed the latest one of mine, where I tried to summarize the recent discussion boosted with your input ) +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk | Contribs " +Unique IPs who contributed to this article in AFC: 204.153.84.10 68.250.57.183 68.250.57.174 +made by ultra-nationalist editors, as well as blind supporters, +June 2007 Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Talk) +Barnstars seem to be worth nothing If you are going to give (talk - contribs) +":: YES they are. And this is ridiculous. Because there is some information that is USEFUL to people this person won't allow it because they didn't add it. Just look, nothing is allowed that Collectonian doesn't want. It's their own little sandbox and they just don't want to let the other kids play. We need this information and it's very helpful stuff. This isn't some crap about when luffy appeared in Shonen Jump #455 of Iron Man or something random. This is a site that has all the original air dates, story arcs, and other information that is VERY useful to fans and the uninitiated alike. This isn't ""fansite"" and I don't understand this person's undying determination to make Wikipedia as pedantic as possible when a quick view of my link shows that it fits this article. " +PS: And it figures, you work for the City of Albuquerque. 207.69.139.137 +":::::::::I see your point... it was ""published"" (if you can call a PhD approval ""publication"") before the mathematicians reviewed it. But are you arguing that the mathematicians didn't review it and give it a pass before ""publishing"" it in their prestigious series? Or are you saying that their review doesn't count for some reason? 21:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) " +That's a big picture The giant picture should be sized down a bit. +Who are you? == Who are you to boss me GUNOTTO, the king around!?!?!?!? == +" Hmm. Not one lousy source, all of them. Denying reliable sources (regardless of how many inaccuracies you find) while willingly using propaganda news services to substantiate secondary and primary evidence is extremely frustrating. Especially when users do not provide a rule or guideline justifying their edits. I'm all for ""balance."" Balance isn't rocket science, we have a rule book on wikipedia that tells us exactly how we are supposed to edit. IF we cannot accept the fact that one's personal opinion of a source (or ignorance of sourcing rules in general) should have no effect in arguing balance/neutrality. This is paramount to the entire mediation. We can make plans and organize all we want, but editing-habits have to change if they disagree with BLP guidelines. Does this not seem reasonable, or should everyone be allowed to edit how they wish? " +" DOB I assume the comment ""born December 9, 1962 in Switzerland) If it appears in IMDB there is no need to remove it here, I know this is a crusade for you"" was directed at me, , although you didn't say so. I wouldn't call it a crusade, but I do remove uncited birth dates from BLPs when i see them, as per the policy WP:DOB. It may appear in the IMDB but it wasn't cited here, and the IMDB is not generally considered a reliable source here in any case. So take it that this info has been challenged as uncited, and please cite it or see it removed. Moreover, WP:DOB specifies that an exact DOB should have been widely published, not just sourced well perhaps the IMDB qualifies for that. In any case, what encyclopedic value does an exact dob serve? (talk) " +" Dan56 bullying other editors Your type of subjective writing has no place on Wikipedia. I saw another example of your bullying and bludgeoning behavior on the ""Yeezus"" album talk page. The other editors, who disagreed with you were respectful, and showed great commonsense. You resort to name-calling, and your b.s. little wiki terms- which you twist. You cannot say the term ""Rave Review"" is not subjective. Yeezus also received terrible reviews. At most, you can say it received some raves, and then define the term and reference it. You need to try to adhere to Wikpedia's policy, in rule and in spirit. I'm disappointed that someone like you, who clearly has a lot of time on his hands (or is this a full time ""job"" for you? Hmmm- record company flak? I wonder.), would stoop to using words like ""Rave."" Perhaps we should include terms like ""sucks"" for artists you don't like. Sorry, Danny Boy, but you're not getting raves from the more intelligent and fair editors. Kanye fan, are we? Aaliyah Fan? Start a fan club- stop using wikipedia for your own narcissism. All the best, Venuzza67 (talk) " +" Jesus, this guy really is a piece of shit isn't he? What kind of state is Western civilisation in when garbage like this is allowed anywhere near academia? It's always the same ""fringe"" lie. He learned to parrot it from Rubenstein. Have you read WD Hamilton's review? You are just a liar Maunus. You are a disgusting, worthless person. ""the only favorable ones are by people who are obviously their comrades-in-arms"" ""comrades-in-arms"" being people who agree with the reasoning? How convenient. Who's the comrade shithead? 1.227.149.33 " +Super Nintendo I saw a Super Nintendo in a few scenes of this film. Can we add this information to the Trivia section? +You are right. It's a phenomime and adverb, meaning, sorry that they are adjectives, misty, hazy, foggy, murky, gloomy and unclear. Usually the word is written 'もやっと' with a small tsu/っ. The line can be translated as 'It something like your heart is shrouded by fog...isn't it?' If you have dictionaries look up the word 'moyamoya/もやもや'. The meaning is almost the same. When you need Japanese help, don't hesitate to ask me. +Negative values for potato with peel Why are some of the nutritional values of a LARGER serving for potato+peel smaller than a SMALLER serving of potato without peel? Also, why are there two tables for potato with peel that seem to contradict each other? I would correct this, but the article seems to be protected. +February 2011 (UTC) You are welcome to comment should you desire to do so, although the conversation (word used advisedly) seems to be entirely focussed on some deficiency of process which seems to largely consist of not having personally sent User:ANUser a summary of the salacious details (. If we had held a full blown arbitration, I'm sure we would have had just as many criticisms for persecuting the guy instead of quietly sorting it out behind the scenes. 00:16, 28 +what is a sockpuppet? i've recently made an account as I am sick of carrying an IP address around- you should do the same. +InfernoXV, you haven't told us what food you like. Have you actually been to China and eaten the regional food and discovered how they are prepared? If you have, then how many times have been there? Do you know how to cook? Eating frequently in restaurants, do you mean once a day, once a week, once a month or once a year? What do you call 'Cantonese' food, or northern food or southern food? Come on InfernoXV, no porky pie please. +billoreilly.com] | footnotes = }} +REDIRECT Talk:Legends of Oz: Dorothy's Return +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page John Spicer (footballer), do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Zanonimy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! " +missing movie The god-awful 2012 movie starring Vincent Fegan. +I can understand your reasons for taking a break. As I have been indicating, the atmosphere is severe. It can have a severe effect on folks unused to such atmosphere. I had noticed that you were saying something about infoboxes at the ANI. As far as I know, there is no set vetting process required for putting up any infoboxes. So, anyone can put up any infobox they want. I don't see much of a value in such infoboxes. I like to form my own opinion based on the particular user's edits and comments only. Looking at the edits and comments of some of the folks who do have infoboxes...... Actually, to my way of thinking, there is no need for such infoboxes. Things become easily obvious from edits and comments alone. I do not say anything about your edits and comments because I think I am unqualified to make an assessment for your contributions. I think I have known some fine scholars on WP and have participated in some exhilarating discussions with them. But invariable, I find their userpages without any infoboxes saying it. Why does one need state the obvious? Actually, I think there are some disadvantages to putting up such infoboxes. If you are seriously considering putting up one, I think you may want to know my detailed view on it in beforehand. Looking at some of your comments, I have the most unmistakable impression that you have an excellent grasp of such issues. I have known very few users about whom I could say the same. (I am speaking only about the ones which I have seen). As such, I was looking forward to other people's sense of sourcing issues would also improve (by having discussions with you). I have also been looking for a particular quote from one particular source and I had the impression that you might probably be in a position to help me in that regard. It is about some other, unrelated article. But since you are busy now, I don't think it would be proper for me to bother you with some silly request of mine. I have noticed that the catalyst with sidekicks is happy because they have been able to drive you away. Actually, it seems to me that they have driven away hundreds of users and also caused blocks on scores of others, are experts at harassing others with warnings, long winded arguments, irrelevant comments, severe ad hominem attacks, etc. etc. etc. also know how to obtain blocks for their opponents at ANIs..... Anyway. Regards.- +" 1. I will not even move my finger to source anything of that BS, I didn't put it there. You put it there without any sources at first, them addede electronic unrelated sources, then changed to printed ones, and all the while, when sources kept changing the text stayed the same to the word! You invented this ""fact"" and how it relates to the whopping 4.4%, so the only thing I am asking, show the relation of massacre to the 4.4% with verbatum citatons from the source. You asked my above about Subtelny's quote, I did it, now it is your turn to support your outlandish claims with facts. I am curious as to how the massacre relates to the whopping 4.4%? 2. Then second question arises, why particularly this region with this tiny Russian minority is mentioned while others, for example Zhytomyr oblast with almost double the number of Russians in Volhynia is overlooked? That again highlights the real reason, why this BS is here - a revenge for mentioning ethnic cleansing of Crimean Tatars. (WP:POINT). If you and Russianname are concearned with the plight of etnic Russians in Western Ukraine, why almost the same number of Russians in Transcarpathia, and even the higher number of Russians in Lviv Oblast have been overlooked? Is that because these numbers could not be used in childish revenge, while Volyn ones, even if they are way lower, can? (WP:POINT) " +Oh not you again!!! And so? After the block has expired, Im gonna kick Gwerns ass again you admin wannabe!!! Im gonna rape you all!!! +"::I don't think its relevant to an article which is first and foremost a biography of Pius. These back and forths between critics and defenders should only be included when they affect his actual biography, not when they are just idosyncracies, like a defender complaining about a critics cover, or the evolution of their positions. Put it in the Hitler's Pope article if you want. (talk) (e@) " +pdf files are common and I definitely recommend downloading the free Adobe Reader. Defining 0^0 = 1 is more common. The pdf does that. +" canyouhearmenow- So, how do you explain the past edits you've made like inserting David L. Cook into Country Gospel Song of the Year at the 1999 Dove Awards, or making home ""tie"" with Larnell Harris at the 1986 Grammy Awards, or putting him as a writer on one of Fergie's songs...etc. this is not libelous, but just the truth. It's not being done mean spiritedly & I'm definitely not bullying. I am just taking the small steps to put the truth out there. Isn't that what Wikipedia is about? Art4artssakeent " +A welcome from Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia! 21:25, January 20, 2006 (UTC) +haiku I left you a haiku, just incase you didnt see it ) +", 3 March 2014 (UTC) Oohhhhh, I see. PSE-36 refers specfically to the trick of burying four more bits of RAM address in the PDE, using some of the bits that would ordinarily ""MBZ"" under plain PSE. Got it. 03:28" +Oppose The title is clumsy and needs changing, and the article needs a lot more content (like most family pages), but a huge family like the Psittacidae needs its own page. talk +" A tag has been placed on Prince Magloire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" The quote probably refers to the old saying ""개는 때려 잡아야 맛있다"", which literally means ""beaten dogs taste better."" Not only it has been proven as a ""misbelief"", there is no belief in Korea about beaten dogs give more stamina AFAIK. I've edited the paragraph. 02:58, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +Chester Marcol is threatening me chester marcol is threatening me and that is bullying.-_-=(get lost chester marcol you dont scare me-_- +Created and copyright (2003) by Eugene Villar (seav).) And released under terms of the GNU FDL, right? ;) +Interference Plaease do not interfere in the personal changes i have made on wikipedia about the Seven Wonders Of The Ancient World as it is none of your buissness.If you want to do so,i may have to take serious action on you and your family.Thank you for co-operating. +" January 2008 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Falmouth, Maine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Dear Mr.RHaworth We have relised that your wikipedia page has come under a number of violent attacks We are happy with this as you are an extreme nob Wikipedia advises that you imediantly kill yourself. Thank you - Wikipedia Staff +Anarchism versus Religion Anarchism what does it mean for this anarchist hobbyist? Anarchism started the First World War over the anarchist assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. A anarchist decided to interrupt a world power practicing imperialism and assassinated the Archduke as he drove by the anarchist in the tiny nation of Serbia. What the anarchist did not know is that there were a multitude of secret treaties among no less that fourteen nations including attitude from the Ottoman Empire and within weeks the world was at war as Serbia was invaded. The result of the war that started in the tiny nation of Serbia is millions of deaths, chemical warfare, proof of machine gun and artillery fire, introduction of aviation into warfare, the Russian communist revolution, and a new world order that led to World War Two, since the Germans believed it was their leaders who failed them causing them to lose the war. World War Two led to millions of deaths and a larger battlefield across the world including China and the Pacific Ocean (Japan was part of World War One, but the results were insignificant compared to the bloody battlefields of Europe). The results of World War Two led to nuclear weapons, a space race, spy satellites, nuclear ships, nuclear bombers, nuclear missiles, communism across the world from communist Russia, United States being called imperialist due to being a world wide undefeated military power who is unafraid to invade anyone except the nations with the largest and best militaries (Iraq had a lager but sad capability military). World War Two also led to the Cold War, Korean War, Vietnam War, and Desert Storm One that was the result of the former allies of World War Two dividing among themselves into two parties and fighting low intensity and hot wars across the world until the year 1991 including, for many families, three or more generations of military service from the United States. Serbia as a result of the wars across the world of the 20th century has been subjected to the Muslims, Russians, United States, Germans, and civil war within itself and still has United States intervention this 21st century. Under President Clinton Serbia was made smaller requiring a split of Kosovo and Serbia after a long bombing campaign that exhausted the stockpile of conventional United States missiles during the 1990s. Serbia got its anarchy and is a backwards nation that has been under subjugation and gunfire since the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Embrace anarchy and declare Heaven non-religion in a discussion section where Heaven is something of the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim faith where the other faiths are atheistic in nature and worship man by a code of conduct, then you should embrace anarchy and go live off the lands in a mountain. You have little knowledge of mythology and I bet you have no idea what you are doing concerning religion other than your personal attitude. +OK, I have made the edits. I am just tired of professional Wikipedia busybodies like Dimadick, who don't have any specialist knowledge on topics like this, making a mess of articles and then manipulating Wikipedia's ridiculous bureaucracy to stifle any dissent. Did he take his edits to the Talk Page for debate, as I initially suggested to him? No, he just engaged in an edit war and waited for an admin to lock it down. It's a farce. +Yeah, I found the Library of Congress's link as well as tons of other useful stuff on and about the Soviet Union, but I am really interested to find out more about this New Soviet Man. Anyone has ideas about this or suggestion on where to look for more information/details? Thanks for your help. +" Seth Material Oasis, thank you for the supportive comments that you made on the Seth Material talk page recently. If you are truly a new editor, there are some things you need to know. Wikipedia's rules governing editing and the behavior of editors are very poorly written. They encourage people who have nothing else to do to spend hours and hours on the site each day. However, once an editor has exhausted his knowledge, any contributions he makes after that are of dubious value. The result is that there are contingents of what I call ""Wiki-addicts"" who make little positive contribution to the encyclopedia, but who make a lot of trouble for other editors. They generally call themselves ""skeptics"", and they spend hours each day attacking articles they don't like. They fancy themselves to be guardians of neutrality, but their edits are rarely neutral. They also fancy themselves to be Wikipedia experts, and consequently they are rarely willing to collaborate. Generally, they are atheists, right-wing Christians and political conservatives, and they attack articles on topics that are not in the mainstream, especially in the area of religion. The Seth Material article has suffered from such attacks since it was created a couple years ago. Recently, several ""skeptics"" ganged up on me and got me kicked off the article. The editors who are now in control of it have no knowledge of the Seth Material whatsoever, beyond the fact that they don't like it, so the article is now controlled by editors who would prefer to delete the article altogether. They have already cut out portions of it. If you want to see the most complete version of the article, look for the version edited by ""Itsmejudith"". You'll find text in there that has since been deleted. Basically, my message to you is that Wikipedia is a hostile environment, especially if you are interested in topics of religion or spirituality. If you have things to say in those areas, it is best to do it on your own web site. With so many editors on Wikipedia intent on censoring information they don't like, it is very hard to make contributions in those areas without getting into non-stop edit-wars. " +Thanks for the policy link. There was only 1 link that I changed, no double links, and the new article picked up several red links. Is there a policy on uncivil editors I could follow? +Jime1138 I never said the articled was retracted. Please pay attention. The statement was retracted and quoting half of a retracted statement is misleading. Get a life because you are obviously enjoying having this terribly biased article out to mislead the public. Did you choose to suck at life or are you paid to do so? +" Good point! Which is why I long ago (it seems, i.e. earlier yesterday, as soon as I learned how) bowed to the formality of acquiring the Wikipedia-form permission. - Still, it'll be awhile, I hope, before sueing someone for using a Nobel-laureate's four-line obituary of Hitler will be publicity to ""revel"" in. Even Murdoch (jewish, sadly relevant in this case) might not want to appear ""supporting"" Hitler that way. Or maybe not, who knows, he might want that obituary suppressed from ever being quoted again. Better safe than sorry, I agree. I like following the guide-lines, but it was hard getting easy info on them, and unpleasant getting there. I bite back, sure - but only ""back"". On the issue itself, I cherish being as correct as only possible. Yet in the relevant case, copy for ""educational purposes"" would be validly claimed - until tried and determined otherwise. Better safe than sorry. Though there's always a limit to how little ""risk"" should, and can, be taken. No risk is never an option." +GA Ohio State Route 369 I have placed the review on hold to give you an opportunity to address state concerns. This is the second short spur road that you have nominated for GA. One must question why you are devoting valuable and limited volunteer resources to highways of less than 2 miles in length when the major Ohio roads such as OH 4 lack even route descriptions. Perhaps you might want to tackle the main roads first. Thanks, +" Or just take a Wikibreak. That is what most people do. Don't let yourself get driven off the pedia by a bunch of illiterate nutjobs. The rid " +" the never ending edit... Of the hundreds on my watchlist this article is like the never ending edit. Of this I'm sure, this article has become a cause and darn if I'll let a ""so"" where there should be a ""but"". If this article with its minutia is your cause well then have at it with all of your attention. It at least keeps you away from the rest of this project. talk Heh. Terri Schiavo as a flypaper for the priority-challenged. I like that notion. ^_^ - My dearest sir, you are so correct! We are going to ramp this up slowly. Terri Schiavo is not a movie star. She is an issue about American jurisprudence and how wrong Congressional intervention is. THAT is her notability. If you think about it, she is just along for the ride. The perspecitve of this article should now change to change to the judges. It is the politicians were who were the flies. They got swatted away, but she sticks to them, does she not? Andrew William Morrow " +Hello Arab Cowboy, I've just made an input on Asmahan. Where is my text????????????? Why can't I even find it in history????????????? By any right and any talent did you remove it?????????? SamarLoulou +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —'''''' (talk) +commenting there. A topic ban is a serious matter +— (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. +Look what I just added onto the article! I wrote the 2nd paragraph. Ian +You have a definite conflict of interest in this situation. Your from Calgary, Harper's home base. You shouldn't have permission at all to edit or oversee his account. I will be lodging a complaint with wikipedia. +Hey Isambard, thanks for your comment. You can see in the section below that OED, Merriam-Webster and Dictionary.com more or less agree with my definition. You're right that I should cite them in the article itself - I'll do that. Thanks again. +" Leave it for now, I'm getting the folks from over WP:WikiProject Airlines to provide some neutral third-party assessment on the above matter, the note I left is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines#Request for comment. ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® " +Why isn't it lucky that there's someone to set the record straight in such a wise and insightful way. +" OK I have firefox on and I'll be using it from now on so hopefully you will no longer see any spelling errors from me. (Though calling my spelling worse than a 4th grader really was not needed)White Shadows I ran away from you " +References I can't find a citation for a Kunes story in the New Yorker. Is there a pen name involved here? +"— Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.42.41.35 out of scoped ""out of scope"" isn t a reason for speedy, You must have meant Wikipedia:Ambasciata was out of scope in WP space, which is correct, but what it needed was simply to be moved into mainspace, which I did Did you mean to be editing with your SMF account? Such edits are usually considered to be in some sense official. '''''' ( talk ) Feedback Sorry, I made a mistake not understand it yet Can you remove it. ) Nothing personal Greetings Elitra, I just wanted to let you know my comments are nothing personal towards you or the other WMF folks but the release of VE with so many problems is premature and folks have a valid point that proper notification wasn't given. Please don't take the following as a negative reflection but I wanted to clarify a couple things. People are frustrated because now, as in the past, it seems as thought the WMF doesn't listen to what us editors are saying. Yes you have evidence that you tried to notify users but the way the notifications were done and the places they were located gives the impression that the folks building these changes don't understand the community or how it works. You are also worknig hard to fix the problems but then releae the app to all logged in users knowing there are a lot of problems, many of which are severe. Then you act as though your surprised and hurt that we are annoyed. We know you are working on the problems, but so are we and we want to feel as though our voices are heard too. When the Visual Editor talk pages aren't filled with long lists of complaints and bugs, then we can talk about a widescale release. But there's no need to rush it out yet. Anyway, I just wanted to clarify that the problems aren't with you, they are with the WMF organizations's ongoing policy of doing whatever they feel like regardless of what us dumb editors think. Happy editing. PS, sorry they mixed us up. Your user page Hi Elitre, when we designed the template, we intended to make it easy for staff to use it and edit it, so added parameters that would make it easy to update the relevant sections. I noticed that you'd substituted the template on your user page instead of transcluding it and presumed this was not intentional, so I've gone ahead and boldly switched it to the template, making a few general fixes. This should allow you to also edit your user page through the Visual Editor. Please feel free to undo my changes if you intended to substitute the template! -) helpfulone Random act of kindness Hello Elitre (WMF), Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! ↑talk↓ Your cute Just wanted to drop a note and tell you that. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.8.58 = +back then It’s nice to see someone without a selfish Mountain Biker or hiker in Gucci sunglasses. Someone who will actually hunt and exist with wildlife. Nice to see a man in the wilderness. We don’t have many men now days they are all cow towing to the political correct and feminine agendas. +Is Diet Coke / Coca Cola Light being Discontinued? Is Diet/Coke Light being discontinued by Coca Cola in order to shift consumer preference to Coke Zero? I recently been to Taipei and Singapore and Coke Light is nowhere to be found. Therefore, it has been effectively discontinued from those markets. Maybe a reference to those facts can be included in the main article. Thanks. +" By the way even when people unblock my username for some reason my IP always gets blocked even though I don't log out, stopping me from editing with username even though that's unblocked, because the IP is blocked. (Special:Ipblocklist - #76164) No idea why, I use firefox 1.5 but no one seems to know what causes this (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) " +Reply Why dont you visit hell where you belong? +Censorship Why was the censorship section removed? +Hi Ed Johnston. Thank you for the heads up. It wasn't me who made those edits, but it's no surprise that +" I didn't know that template existed. Thanks. Mid (contribs) " +"Is it just me, or is this sentence a little too pedantic and POV? ""The truth, of course was that Bush, like anyone who had a sense of responsibility, realized that there was nothing he could do at the moment, and found it best not to throw the children into a panic by telling them the country was under attack."" " +The introduction of this article needs to be changed various scholars have agreeded that yadavs are chandravanshi khastriyas and some have not. The following link can be used to verify that yadavs are khastriyas. http://books.google.com/books?id=RfdtUUnVQLQC&pg;=PA388&dq;=Yadavs+OBC+kshatriyas&hl;=en#v=onepage&q;=Yadavs%20OBC%20kshatriyas&f;=false http://www.sishri.org/velir.html ( This website clearly mentions in some parts of india Yadavs are khastriyas ). http://storyofkannada.blogspot.com/2008/05/origin-of-seuna-dynasty.html Also till 1400 AD there were dynasties which claimed that they are yadavs. The descendants of this dynasties still would be living in India. Also the article mentions that only from 19th century yadavs are trying to raise their status. Its wrong. In 1400 AD a dyansty claimed they are yadavs ( chandravanshi ). These people cannot disappear just like that. proof some scholars claim yadavs as khastriyas. http://books.google.com/books?id=RfdtUUnVQLQC&pg;=PA388&dq;=Yadavs+OBC+kshatriyas&hl;=en#v=onepage&q;=Yadavs%20OBC%20kshatriyas&f;=false book We and our administration By K. C. Brahmachary page 388 many scholars agree yadavs as khastriyas and some scholars dont. I request kindly to correct the introduction. please dont neglect these valuable points. So far there is like three books which mention yadavs as khastriyas. +I was also my way of apologizing for my salty acronym. +Check Sanguo Zhi if you don't believe me. I was trying to show, with common sense, what Cao Cao would do. And Zhuge Liang did control a Shu force, which was not garrisonned in Wulin. Technically, the Three Kingdoms were not established, but you know to who I reference. +That is why Wikipedia never grows and stays the same then. The new editor who adds something new is the one given the handicap. A new addition or edit is not a revert. -( 99.56.174.63 +" Rav just undid my change and put it back the way it was before. (which is fine if my changes broke some browsers). So, the ""bunched up edit links"" are back which is really more of a quirky nuisance than a design issue. The goal is stacked images on the right side either way. The links rav added in the in the map are completely independent of what I tried. Separate issues that can be addressed independently. " +SciAm resource Sacred Salubriousness New research on self-control explains the link between religion and health in Scientific American December 12, 2011 (page 102). Michael Shermer is publisher of Skeptic magazine (www.skeptic.com), and author of The Believing Brain. 97.87.29.188 . +" In light of your relationship with the label and the band, it sounds like you shouldn't be creating an article about them. Please review the conflict of interest policy. Besides, the only content that was not copied verbatim from somewhere else was the infobox, the opening sentence, and the discography. Mufka (t) (c) " +" Hi Sandy, I didn't think of that before making my edit. I just thought that the heading title souhnded wrong because that section talks about a group of people, of which there is more than one, kinda like the other heading titles in that article ( ""Difficulties in relationships"", ""Gender aspects"", and most notably ""Autistic adults""). A singular heading title there still sounds a little odd to me, but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. ''''''87 " +WP:NEWSORG and source summaries Per WP:NEWSORG a particular source may be considered unreliable for a particular statement whether that news organization is considered generally reliable for other purposes. The Reuters and LA Times sources conflict. Either all nations universally do not recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or there are a few who do recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. It's not both. Which is correct? +"* I'll tag along if you're looking for one more... I sit in front of a screen all day in school just surfing the pages. Anything to stop those lil bastards who think they're cute by writing ""PENIS VAGINA"" all over the place. " +Hi What would you require me to do to prove that I will not be abusive again? I am prepared to accept some kind of suspended sentence if this is what you want. I have admitted I was wrong. I will try to change. +"25, 5 June 2015 (UTC) ""Myth of 'Flat Earth' belief""? The titling of this article has been difficult, as the ""myth"" it is about is not about the false idea that the Earth is flat (see Flat Earth), but of whether there was a general belief in that false idea in Europe during the Medieval Period. I invite comment on whether ""Myth of 'Flat Earth' belief"" would be a better title. ~ (talk) Russell calls it the “modern Flat Earth Error” or just the “Flat Error” in Inventing the Flat Earth (1991). In a 1997 conference he then refers to it as “the myth of the flat earth” (no capitals anywhere). None of these variants convey what the actual error is, and of course the reason Russell doesn’t try is that a literally accurate name would be quite long, something along the lines of “the modern misconception of a medieval European belief in a flat earth”. “Myth of a 'Flat Earth' belief” isn’t horrible, but it’s still not likely to mean anything to someone who doesn’t already know what it’s supposed to mean, in which case we haven’t achieved anything by changing. Russell’s book title works better than any of these other attempts. Something along the lines of “Flat Earth concoction” would give less chance for someone to mistake the article as a description of the belief that the earth is flat, something that has already happened twice in just the call for a capitalization change. Comment: We don't care if Russell likes to overcapitalize in ways that MOS:CAPS doesn't sanction (and the source cited above suggests that there's a ""myth of Russell's capitalization"" at work here. Heh.) WP has a convention of not capitalizing such labels, even for universally accepted theories. ""Modern flat earth error"" is a good start toward settling on a WP article title that makes sense. This article is about a modern belief about pre-modern belief in a flat earth. How do we address that most clearly? Two previously mentioned possibilities were ""Modern misconception of prevailing Middle Ages' belief in a flat Earth"" (which has a possessive usage error), and ""Modern misconception of prevailing belief in a flat Earth in history"". I think I'd go with: '' (with precisely that capitalization; see above RM, which can and should proceed in the interim to comply with WP:MOSCAPS, since this ""what should this be titled"" discussion could drag out for who knows how long, if it ever gets resolved).  —  ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:" +" Taken from Bell X1 External Links section Bell X1 Flock Album Review at WERS.org •wicke " +I thought we had reached consensus in the above talk item, that marvin was staying for sure. I'm not sure what LMHAMMER was proposing with his last comment. the pinball clubs go pinballHQ (as proceeds go to the Pinball Hall of Fame) might be worthwhile to keep.... or be placed on the PHoF wiki page IPDB stays as it is similar to IMDB links on movie-related pages PinballNews will probably stay (or, at the very least, be used as references for news-related items) PHoF should stay... or at least be linked to the PHoF page properly Links to Stern and Pat Lawlor stay, being the last pin manufacturer and major pin designer company left Simulators WILL be questioned by some. PinMAME being the one that people will be most vocal about keeping (the others can go to DMOZ) Online communities can go Other information can go How's that for a summary? Did I miss anything? +user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking +And your point is...? It's just an image. Who cares about which one you think is better? This isn't your site. Nobody cares if you used to work for the Transit Authority. All that nonsensical vandalism just for a damn image? Oh wow. Get over it and move on with your life. It's not that serious. +" Pot stirring? well you and the militant and trouble making wimmin of this project are the ones to recognize that. I applaud you. Why not block me too Coffee? You can really get your name in lights then. (talk) " +" deleted ""Archive Okina"" Posted to Accounting4Taste also: 04:50, 25 April 2008 Accounting4Taste (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Archive Okina"" ‎ (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: Article mistakenly archived into article space moved to userspace) if you felt it was inappropriate to have in archive, then why put it in my space? Remove it completely if it is not sufficient for archive (done to clear space to continue the debate on appropriate usage of Hawaiian grammer are you familar with this discussion? It is important & that is why I felt It wasn't deemed to be deleted but archieved for others to refer back to.)" +THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!!THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERSON IS AN ASSHOLE!!! THIS PERS +u mad bro? 186.86.130.176 +herkimer dimonds do you know anything else about herkimer dimonds? +) (although I'm doing a quick check first in case it's from an obviously public domain source +That'll do fine. Thanks. +Hey I missed it, and the Posts site says their archive does not contain articles published in the last 14 days. Any chance you could send me a copy? haxorcrowbar@hotmail.com +" Request for clarification Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_October_26#Category:Fictional_businesspeople Per the discussion, is that ""keep"" or ""keep only as a parent category""? - " +The page has been vandalized 10 times. +makes the problem much worse +Removal of sourced content Re List of new religious movement and cult researchers You are removing sourced content and vandalizing the page.If you do not understand the criteria for inclusion on a list don't edit the page. You're supposed to be an experienced editor - act like one. Thanks +Request for arbitration I have opened a case at the Arbitration Committee regarding your close of the Ginger Jolie debate, noting both procedural and substantive errors, and focusing on the substitution of individual opinion for consensus community determination. +" I am really surprised by this. Anyway. I am Emil Janev, with user ""ejanev"". I have nothing to do with ""Damemk"" or any other user. Please request any information from me that might help in identifying as myself with my user account. I am ready to give my email address. There is mention that I can contact any administrator by email. So please let me know if there is any e-mail where I can send this or any other required information. About the Lazar_Kolisevski page: Lazar Kolisevski is born in Sveti_Nikole. That's my birthplace too. I have lived there for almost 30 years. I certainly know well about the people that have lived and live there now. So if there is any way that I can send any information to confirm my case that I am Emil Janev, with user ""Ejanev"" please let me know. One other thing that comes of my mind is that somehow if ""Damemk"" is now a real user, but another user masked under ""Damemk"" I was badly set up in this case. Thanks for your time. Sincerely. " +Further House episodes Discussion I'm not here to ask about why, or even to oppose you in this matter. In fact, going off of what I've seen everywhere else (such as Monk and Psych), I have to agree with you. However, I don't really agree with Wikipedia's policy on this. Is there somewhere this can/is being discussed? Thank you. +" Well someone needs to do it. D Talk " +" ?Regular Force? ""Regular Force"" is the templates name given to the link to the basic article ""Australian Army"" which is misleading; as the article (as it should) gives an overview of both Regular Army and Army Reserve elements. If some regular member is keen to create an article specifically on the ARA (excluding the reserve elements) in addition to the overall ""Australian Army"" that would be good. Linking the entire army, under a reg only link is inappropriate." +If you do, I'll freshen my Snapeatar. +" DYK credit for Bardstown You did not credit me for Bardstown Historic District when you did the DYK credits; it was a double hook. Seek his grace " +The bastard always does it to me. An eye for an eye. Sean.hoyland is a fucking cunt. +" A sense of ""postulate"" is ""propose the existence of"" and that seems to be the sense used here. And it was Maxwell that first postulated the constant speed of light (in 1898 I believe), which is necessarily independent of inertial frame of reference." +Mind taking a look at the MHP mediation? I'm interested in you thoughts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Monty_Hall_problem Thanks. +Toronto''' Hamilton, Toronto,and Oshawa are now tethered together with the criteria set forth in the article. As such, Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa form I contiguous urban area, and reaches a pop near 6 mil. Check google earth if you have any doubts. +WikiProject History of Science newsletter Issue III - September 2007 The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse +I kid you not, cunt. +LOL you're one of those suck ups to Roger, the article mentions. By the way I've met you and I think that you're whiny piss ant of a man. It's a pity that over the past two decades the internet has evolved to work in favor of creatures like you. IRL you're nothing to the world, yet like a self deluded Fitzcarraldo you've now found your virtual hill on which to drag your boat. So glad you've been finally exposed. Please do rebut, we're all waiting. LOL. 86.182.41.0 +" Yes, I forgot to address the amendment to include criticisms issue. Based on my reasoning concerning Clinton's statement, the criticisms are equally irrelevant and should not be included (in my humble opinion). To Mdiamante - I realize this is not Lexis. However, I think we can set a good precedent in the legal articles by refraining as much as possible from POV editing. I've always criticized Wikipedia based on its lack of reliability and blatant bias, but when I came across this article I thought ""Wow, maybe this is a topic I can help contribute to without all of the POV nonsense."" Then, of course, I saw the Dred Scott section and thought ""shit."" It's not so much that I don't think ANY cases or legal topics should include sections/statements from groups/individuals unconnected to the legal community. Indeed, it would be insane to make such a claim, given the almost-revolutionary impact of some cases - not just on society, but on legal thought. See, e.g., Roe (which, by the way, I was pleasantly surprised with). Rather, I just think some are not, and this happens to be one of them. Perhaps my opinion would be different if old Bill had supported his statement with some sort of reasoning, but he clearly did not. It was just a conclusory assertion; something my mother might say in a fit of anger. But alas, this is not a battle I'm going to wage. I will continue browsing legal articles when I get some time and decide if the POV is decidedly less prevalent than in other areas. If so, I'd love for Wikipedia to become a hobby.65.247.226.99 " +" A Helpful Haiku Meaneager, I've written this lovely haiku to help you understand the situation: I posted some fish ""Gross!"" you said, and took them down but you cannot win." +" MS marrying PBS doesn't preclude a prior affair. Would 'liason' have less of a negative connotation? Saying that they ""fell in love"" is a highly subjective statement about their unverifiable emotions. It also simply emplies that PBS empregnated MS rather than actually saying so. I am not attempting to impose a moral judgement; I am attempting to turn an ambiguous explanation of the story into one which is more concrete. An unbiased sentence would state what they did rather than what their emotional state may have been. Even stating that they ""had intercourse"" or ""engaged in sexual activities"" would be more appropriate than ""fell in love"". " +Finally, mention how many Germans lived in Serbia in 2010 (according to which census?) and mention of Srebrenica are unrelated to basic subject of this article. +Yeah, I mean uploading an image not already on Wikipedia. +I understand your arguments, and, though I still don't agree with you, but, since I don't feel strongly on this, and I can see that everyone else thinks that we should leave it as is, I'll drop the issue +From what I have read recently, the project is NOT cancelled, its still underway. +wanna blank this cuz i'm liberal +" Seems done: Questionnaire_construction#Types_of_questions (talk) " +" Stop interacting with Someone65. End of story. Easy solution, and no one gets blocked, mmk? He's being told the same thing. /COMMS/ " +In an effort to avoid any future edit war, I wanted to discuss why I feel that the lead should be changed. As I've noted previously, the citations given for rap metal repeat links sourced later in the article. The reason that punk rock had been given as a genre was because it was the most commonly used term given in articles about the band, rather than rap rock, a term that is not used by the band. While it has been argued that Rolling Stone is a stronger source than some of the others, it should be noted that these reviews were written, as previously noted, during the period in which the band was signed to a major label, when the band received more coverage than it has while recording and releasing albums independently, and sources agree that the majority of the band's works (its debut EP, debut album, and all independent releases) reflect a punk influence, rather than a metal influence, and most certainly the band's most recent work is considered to be punk-influenced. Thus, taking into consideration that the majority and most recent of the band's works is considered to be punk rock, I feel that this is the genre that should be given in the lead. ( ) +I done got trolled, didn't I? Aww shucks, I should have known better than to respond as if there were actual sounds being emitted by the words on the screen. People are such believers in the impossible. I was caught. +Kuban Kozak used this terminology because it was importent in the historical part so we could understand the time. The names of the peoples was an importent part of that time, you cant ignore them. If you would like to explain them you are welcome to do so. And Little Russians doesnt mean they are little but that the Ukrainian people are little by the number reletively to the Russian people. M.V.E.i. +I guess there is also the option for images - there is still that production-like image that someone added to WikimediaCommons. Also, I finally found some decent caps! (here). Srfanone +Heh, look, not EVERYTHING is on google. you are a dumbass. +" - REPLY: The sources are secondary internet sources quoting the journal Parma Eldalamberon, issue #17 (www.eldalamberon.com/parma17.html), where Tolkien's personal linguistic notes (dating to the time right after LotR's release) and editorial discussion thereof were published in 2008. http://realelvish.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board;=words&thread;=27&page;=1 http://www.sindarin.de/tolkienforum/viewtopic.php?t=294&postdays;=0&postorder;=asc&start;=30 ""Du."" is an abbreviation for the dual number (which indicates that a subject of two persons is being referred to). - S.P." +" ""He had been caught by a native tribe, who were preparing to execute him, when an American missionary intervened and persuaded them to hand him over to the state police. The police soon released him. He relocated to Colombia and later Ecuador, killing about three girls a week."" -Score 1 for the religious fanatics. Or a few hundred, depending on the number of girls that wouldn't have died if it wasn't for that douchebag missionary." +"Particularly with this AfD, which was done two years ago and was part of a badly composed multi-article AfD, and at the time it was for a company called ""One Piece Games"" not this list. " +" Hellenism Hello EdJohnson. My edit wasn't incorrect. I am aware of the revival of Greek religion. The problem is that the name ""Hellenismos"" has been chosen and imposed throughout Wikipedia by user Reigndog, who I suspect to be the same as Dchmelik, the same user who ""coined"" the term creating the portal. " +seeing as it's offical i'd think so it just takes some common sense. +Or like TenPoundHammer and NowYouSeeMe, they will continue to harass even if you do things right. It's like they dare you to post something and they start jumping on you or post messages constantly until they force you to leave which is what they do. Nobody on here is running a competition like American Idol or is it just one big clique on here where people are getting chased off because they want you to leave and it will continue if I stay on and another person will be a target of harassment by TPH and NYSM. People who harass don't get any points with me. But don't worry about me coming back to Wikipedia because I won't be back. (talk +Piss off and get a life. I write whatever I want to write. +As I told you, that's just a POV, that directly sends a message of separatism and hatred. That's what is isolating you and your 'supporters' from the real world and makes you being BALKAn instead of EU. It will be like that until you accept the reality and face the truth, which is the facts I that I listed above. Adios +" People have given up on Wikipedia's front page It's obvious the last couple of years Wikipedia front page lost its appeal to the people (nobody cares to even debate it anymore, with so few visitors about it) because it refuses to allow democratic procedures other than ""we'll take into consideration your petty suggestions, peasant"". If you want to improve it, stop putting Directors, ""Arbitrators"" and Know-it-alls in general on any section of the front page sub-themes and start learning from websites like reddit.com. Let people submit whatever and the best news, 'did you know', whatever, even page will go top *by simple visitor 'upvoting'*. Because your Elitism of having ""enlightened"" or only regular visitors with the process of writing in a wiki format with lengthy reasonings is not justified. You will never replace Democracy with ""Enlightened Elites"". This was the vision of every fascist regime in the history of the world and it failed. " +Thank you! I've thought about nominating it, but have been hesitant: I want to provide proof of its serialization and incorporate the German review (thank you for translating it, by the way). For the former, it's a matter of finding the right source. For the latter, I've seen various ways to incorporate translated reviews, but am still treading a bit carefully. +Maybe the best way to proceed would be if Jehochman would address the archived arguments that previously prevailed. +The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to recognize their mistakes. You were warned about interfering on user talk pages , if you carry on altering my talk page, interfering in my actions, or otherwise harassing me, I will have no choice but to reopen this case against you. I hope this is clear to you, because I am not going to continue discussing this or any matter with you. The next time you alter, edit, post a warning or otherwise interfere with my page, it will be straight back to ani. +Cleanup From what I've seen... This article is a complete mess! I'll clear this up. +ISBN 978-956-310-774-6 Patagonia Chilena +" Genetic research has found that modern-day Polynesians, however, are more closely related to Southeast Asians than to American Indians. 03:01, August 27, 2005 (UTC)" +I don't think you have better sources than NATO )) +you have never sockpuppeted? That +An admin of dreamhosts wikipedia site has tried to recruit meat puppets to this wiki article to shower this company with praise and turn it into a big nice free advertisement. Dreamhost is obviously no dream but I don't really think that it's apropriate that we make a wikipedia article that gives one the idea that dreamhost is just one big scam. The question then becomes, what exactly can an article about dreamhost contain and the answer to that is simply not a whole damn lot. I therefor think that it's best that this article gets deleted. +Speaking as someone who does come from the design industry (both web and deadtree, the former for 16 years, the latter for 20) I can assure you that the single element that is most responsible for readability is white space. Rarely, if ever, does readability increase when white space is reduced. The fact that you want to conserve pixels is irrelevant. The eye can keep track of two columns far better than three because you are decreasing the white space and simultaneously increasing visual 'noise'. My recommendation is to leave it at two and allow the reader to continue to scroll down should they wish to read them in their entirety. +Dear Martin, thanks for your input and contribution to the Biva articles. Wikimedia Commons is an online repository of free-use images. The work of Paul Biva is in the public domain in countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years or less. I've just added the template PD-art-100 to the Commons images for Paul Biva. There is no reason why the photos you uploaded cannot be used in the French Paul Biva article. The user that removed them for the Paul Biva article was not justified in doing so. They need not be published. My only recommendation is to use good quality images. Pictures from auction sales are allowed. The images you uploaded are in the public domain because they represent works of art painted by a French artist who died more than 100 years ago. I will see if I can find some nice works by P. Biva online, and I will upload them to Commons, then I will proceed to post them in the French Paul Biva article. Let me know what you think. P.S. I would love for you to upload more Paul and Henri Biva works some to Commons. +" The following is a direct quote from the Spitfire II Pilots notes. (i) High speed in the dive. This, coupled with the fact that the very effective elevator control, and comparative instability in pitch of this aeroplane, makes it very easy for the pilot to impose high load factros, or ""g"", when looping, doing tight turns, or pulling out of the dive. Altough the safety factor of the aeroplane is about 10, it is well within the pilot's power ""10g""; the wings would certainly fail is this figure is much exceeded. In very bumpy atmposphere... etc. etc. Everybody is free to make his own conclusion and wheter the other accusations, to which I do not even bother to reply, have any sort of credibility. They are, in my opinion, the struggling of an aircraft fan against referenced, documented, verifiable facts by all means available for some time now. Baseless accusations do not make good contributions. " +Vandals are the bad guys Block THEM next time, and stop picking on the people trying to help. 85.210.182.11 +Please stop removing my links. InfoStor articles are well-researched and vendor neutral. The add to the body of knowledge regarding each subject. Thanks, Ann Silverthorn +" I liked swadhyayee's reason ""one should introspect"". Should have used that against Hornplease when he was trolling on the workshop page. Nothing like some nice wholesome community consensus.man " +Mar 2005 (UTC) Thanks for your comments Rick, I'm sure you agree that this is a collaborative project, and that we can all use a little friendly support and oversight sometimes. I know I appreciate it when people correct my mistakes, Thanks, 10:47, 2 +, 16 April 2012 (UTC) If you are honestly defending the WHO, the standards here at Wikipedia are very low. This is regarding an organization, public facts, and tainted research. Your reference to WP:BLP is laughable and irrelevant. 04:27 +Cryosurgery vs. Cryotherapy What is the difference, Cryosurgery vs. Cryotherapy? WP has two separate articles, similar content, no clear explanation. Cryosurgery could be considered sub-category of more general concept of Cryotherapy. Or, Cryosurgery could be considered to be destructive treatment, Cryotherapy non-destructive treatment. But in practice, the terms seem to be used rather inter-changeably. So, I'd propose that the articles be merged, with inclusion of whatever can be properly said about any differences. There do not seem to be relevant disambiguation pages now.-96.233.19.238 +" Should be FAC, because of the election To be more interesting, the article should leave out the accusations and stay with the facts. Here’s my suggestion for an outline of the article: Sarah Palin moved to Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school. She has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. She graduated from Wasilla High School in 1982. She attended the University of Idaho where she received in 1987 a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism. In 1988, she married Todd Palin who she met in high school. They have five children – Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper and Trig. Track is in the Army. Mrs. Palin was active as a sports team mom, coaching basketball and volunteering on the PTA to help make her kids' public education better. She served served two terms on the Wasilla City Council and two terms as the Mayor of Wasilla. She served as chair of the Alaska Conservation Commission. On December 4, 2006, she become Alaska's first woman governor. She came to the office of Governor promising landmark ethics reform. Under her leadership, Alaska implemented the Senior Benefits Program to provide support for low-income older Alaskans. Governor Palin began a $40 billion natural gas pipeline. She sent a large share of oil and gasoline tax revenue directly back to the people of Alaska and suspended the state's fuel tax. She used her veto pen to eliminate nearly a half a billion dollars in ""wasteful"" spending such as the ""Bridge to Nowhere."" She sold the state's luxury jet and fired the Governor's personal chef and driver. As Governor, Palin is chair of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She also serves as chair of the Natural Resources Committee of the National Governors Association. Mrs. Palin became the Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States in September of 2008. " +", 10 December 2010 (UTC) YOU is the 1 who is barking up the wrong tree, Mike!!! i have absolutely no doubt that this ""theory"" is a bunch of nonsense; however, it is not a fringe theory becuase it is widely held. the name should be the same as it is now b/c tha tis the most adequately based title for the multifarious nature of this political snotsotmr. User:Smith Jones 19:33" +Need his official photo. +Yea I do sorry well its fine now but thanks for being smart with me dude. Another question ed, do you own Wikipedia..? or do have no life and thinks its funny to block IP adress's? Get back to me Or will You just block me... haha you prob will +Well, so much for compromise. Cholga, you're making it painfully obvious that you're not acting in good faith at all. Like your last edit summary: i dont have to compromise, i have consensus, you not doing me any favors, if you insist on reverting you will be in v of the 3rr. What, do you own this article? And bandying about threats of reporting another editor for 3RR violations after a bona fide offer of a compromise? I'm curious to know what others who may be watching this make of all this ... + +" Thank you for rating this article. Now I finally know that it is a ""start"" of low importance. Very helpful indeed. (Talk) " +"Unfortunately al-Hamdi doesn't cite his statement and it appears that the statement should be attributed to Oweiss's ""Father of Economics"" article. " +I've made a request according to the instructions on the page linked by Bogdan. +Nice enhancements to the article. I will be on vacation for a week starting tomorrow. Just one other thought. While I think that the lead is a fairly good ecapsulation of the article, others may find it a tad bit brief. You may wish to enhance it. +Btw: I am very personally offended by the allegation that I don't contribute to the encyclopedia enough. Kidding. As I said, you're right. I'm constantly trying to change that -/ See secondary antisemitism for one example of me writing something. Or Template:Archive Box Collapsible, or the rewrite I did on WP:WAF. But there is so much to do and so little fucking time. (for the record: I am now confirming this posting as going without an edit summary, as a Kudos to your whole input which I honestly appreciate) — Dorftrottel⁠ +" Call for criminal investigation by Senator Barbara Boxer: section added, deleted, reverted back I have added sourced material in a new section regarding an extremely serious matter: a call by Senator Barbara Boxer of California for the Department of Justice to criminally investigate Southern California Edison's installment of faulty steam generators that have closed the SONGS facility since January of 2012. The section and some of the content has been deleted, and I have reverted the deletion. I ask that the material not be edit-warred over, and that we instead discuss the material on the merits and seek consensus. Thanks. dafax " +I agree that it isn't helpful to the averge reader. ·:· ·:· +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Optical fiber. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (mailbox) " +That's a good one! I've never read Sheridan Poorly before. Yes indeed. Homeopathy is the hypochondriac's best friend. +In fact, I was trying to appeal to the better angels of your nature in regard to your obviously held belief that I am some sort of monster out to get Karel. Anyhoo...here +That has nothing to do with press code in Germany. His full name is not mentioned because of personal rights whitch result from the Human dignity which is protected be the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. +So basically, the user Johnuniq is to follow the user Jagged85 to every single article he edits. Than, Johnuniq (an islamophobe) continues to blindly argue that the sources must be wrong because they are introduced by Jagged85. Score 1 for Bias. +Get a life you stupid wanker. No one is interested in your moronic theories and we are all tired of your semi-literate rants. You are a vandal and a troll. +" An example of the hate literature published on Nostradamus by ""Lemesurier"" (who changed his name to French to sell his books on the NOSTRADAMUS name!) http://prophetofprovence.blogspot.co.uk/ ""Lemesurier's"" view of Nostradamus in a nutshell: http://thenostradamuspoem.blogspot.ca/ And this debunker get to write pretty well the entire Wikipedia article on Nostradamus without challenge. And the fools allow him, bringing doom on them all." +Still A Troll Just gotta have the last word, eh? More proof of trolldom. Ashida Kim +terminology that can be construed as +Actually, there is a Kurdish flag. I would encourage you to write for Wikipedia rather than delete that which you do not agree with. +Nothing about the sexual abuse should be included in my opinion, because it upsets republicans. As per wikipedia rules, facts should only be included when they are in line with republican politcal views. Of course this abuse is hugely important to Gerry Adams, but is unhelpful to this wikipedia article, wikipedia is fighting for a united ireland. +I agree with the template point (but I'm not volunteering to convert since that's not my thing. There are no guidelines as such but if you take a look at the article FIDE World Chess Championship 2006, the formatting there was the result of much discussion and seems a de facto standard. +" Used in the last several hours, not days, if my memory of biochem is correct. The carboxylic metabolite is what hangs around, not THC. Pure THC means very recent usage. This autopsy report has actually been out awhile now, it's the same one with the ""bloody knuckles"", just the media didn't jump on it. Maybe they are milking this thing into a daily news cycle " +" EDIT Also you might have misunderstood about the ""Other"" section. Its not every time it appears in a show or the Green Day episode of CSI would be included. Its every time the song is on the ""Soundtrack"" for a particular show. " +Thank you for your kind reply. Judging from the sources I have, I think the concept of spatial tense is only relevant in the context of the artificial language Lojban. The statement that several natural languages have spatial tense as defined in the article is still an unsubstantiated claim, so imho it should be pulled out pending evidence. Part of the problem is the very name of the concept. 'Tense' has the connotation of 'time'. In fact, grammatical tense is frequently (if loosely) defined as 'location in time'. Thus, it doesn't really make sense to talk about 'spatial tense'; it would be like talking about 'temporal place'. Since the only relevant use of the concept stems from Lojban grammar, I think it would be best to start the article out of the Lojban perspective, defining spatial tense as Lojban grammar defines it. And since spatial tense (according to Lojban grammar) is merely 'obligated expression of location', the broader context of the article should be the expression of space in language. And this is where observations about the connection between language and the way we perceive the world come in. The way I see it, the spatial cases of the Hopi language (one of the many languages that do very interesting things with space) don't really belong in an article about an invented, English-inspired, grammatical category. What we are really missing is a decent article about the way languages deal with location and space. Which is something I added to my to do list. — (talk) 16:55, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC) +" Precisely. (Go Colts!) " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chernobyl. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. fisto " +NOT EMO!!! so.... the beatles are emo???? because shaggy hair cut,OBVIOUS the beatles NOT are emo!!!!!!!!!!,and Panic at the Disco too they are NOT Fucking EMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... +I don't think this page is protected. Did you try making the edit? +" You're enabling a group of editors whose entire purpose here is to propagandize for their ethnonationalist cause and spread derision on the enemy. The serious failure is to allow the warping of wikipedia articles over a period of years, not my refusal to adopt a warped and frankly childish internal Wikipedia values system. I know this beyond your understanding. Those fellows will be delighted maybe they'll return the article to the staet it started and the lede said the article was evidence of the ""debasement of the Arab mind."" . I pity you. I really do. So it goes, so it goes. " +List of Alberta general elections|List of Alberta general elections]] [[User talk:117Avenue#Princess Elizabeth|Princess Elizabeth +PS to Harald, if you want to take that out of the Introduction, you FIRST need to try to take it out of the article itself ! +ILL COME TO YOUR HOUSE ND MAKE U SORE BETWEEN UR LEGS +Ass you might want to Kiss Mine +Hail Vintagekits, he prospers while you fail. You will never defeat him! +Contact us to any inquiries on my contact No.9323005060./7506975207 +" Karma in Buddhism At pages like Karma in Buddhism some editors are inserting popular Buddhist teachers rather than academic books.Talk " +You see. the earliest version even doesn't mention food safety and 90 days.... for best before date http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/32/CXS_001e.pdf 222.67.211.41 +REDIRECT Talk:Pat Donnelly (athlete) +":::Besides, I don't like your misrepresenting me on Template talk:GermanGov at all. I did not ""refuse"" to read it, I didn't express anything on it, because it was completely unclear to me what the heck you were talking about. So don't go around claiming I did something when I didn't. " +In French Wikipedia: Western Asia. +There is also a category Category:Chief Ministers of North-West Frontier Province. That page has a lot of text - which it shouldn't as a category page. I will move here as a start. Sahibzada Abdul Qayyum Khan First Chief Minister of NWFP he was ousted in a vote of no confidence by by Dr Khan Sahib. Dr. Khan Sahib (Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan): Served As Chief Minister a total of three times. 1937 to 1939 and from March 14, 1945 to March 12, 1946 and til August 21, 1947 Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan: Served as Chief Minister twice from August 22, 1947 to December 17, 1951 and from December 17, 1951 to April 22, 1953. Sardar Abdur Rashid Khan: Served as Chief Minister from April 23, 1953 to July 18, 1955. Sardar Bahadur Khan: Served as Chief Minister July 29, 1955 to October 14, 1955. Maulana Mufti Mehmood: Served as Chief Minister from May 1, 1972 to February 15, 1973. Sardar Inayatullah Khan Gandapur: Served as Chief Minister from May 29, 1974 to February 9,1975. Mr. Nasrullah Khan Khattak: Served as Chief Minister from May 3, 1975 to April 19, 1977. Mr. Iqbal Khan Jadoon: Served as Chief Minister from April 9, 1977 to July 5, 1977. Arbab Muhammad Jehangir Khan Khalil: Served as Chief Minister April 7, 1985 to May 29, 1988. Lt. Gen. (Rtd) Mr. Fazle Haq: Served as caretaker Chief Minister from May 29, 1988 to December 2, 1988 Mr. Aftab Ahmad Khan Sherpao: Served as Chief Minister twice from December 2, 1988 to August 6, 1990 and April 24, 1994 to November 12, 1996. Mr. Mir Afzal Khan: Served as Chief Minister from November 1990 till July 19, 1993. Mufti Muhammad Abbass: Served as caretaker Chief Minister from July 19, 1993 to October 19, 1993. Pir Sabir Shah: Served as Chief Minister from October 20, 1993 to February 25, 1994. Raja Sikandar Zaman: Served as caretaker Chief Minister from November 12, 1996 to February 12, 1997. Sardar Mahtab Ahmad Khan Abbassi: Served as Chief Minister from February 21, 1997 up to October 12, 1999. Mr. Akram Khan Durrani: Present Chief Minister from November 29, 2002 to date. +A Disney Production Studio? +Photos I'm of to St Pancras on 21st of April, any imagery requests? +Actually it's you who deflected by mentioning the minority Shia jurisprudence. And your opinion about whether Ayatollah Khamenei's position is consistent or not, is irrelevant on Wikipedia. You need to back up your assertions with reliable sources if you want to include it. This thread was for determining whether the sources that said Khamenei used the Shia doctrine of lying (Taqiya) were credible enough, and it's decided that the sources are not reliable, so that content remains out of the article, period. +I wrote an essay about the World Bank and the privatization of TeleMex once. It's an interesting topic but there were many negative consequences as a result of the privatization. These have NOT been addressed in this article which reads like a corporate advertisement written by billionaire Carlos Slim. +YOUR vandalism I said the CRITICS were alleged to be criminals etc. Why did you take offence and accuse me of things? You have never met me. You can go fuck yourself you brainwashed wanker. +The original line I agreed to was this. The United States cancelled its offensive biological weapons program by executive order (November 1969 and February 1970) and appears to have destroyed all biological weapons by February 1973. Now, once again, the first line is from several dozen sources, so if we list one, (i.e. According to the U.S. government) then I say we list them all. The second point of contention and appears to have destroyed all biological weapons by February 1973 can be verified via a FOIA request. I would not object to leaving that in. 17:20, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC) +Hello? I've posted here to ask you for continuing the GA review on Walt Disney Animation Studios. Please do continue giving me the precious comments so that it can eventually pass! +" ""She attended the Wellesley in Washington program at the urging of Professor Alan Schechter, for whom she would write a senior thesis about the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky[6] that later became the subject of mystery."" - somehow i feel that the message of the sentence is not coming out well. needs re-wording ""Around this time, she decided to join the Democratic Party."" - what prompted her to join democratic party. needs info here ""She became the first student in Wellesley College history to deliver their commencement address.[7]"" - any particular reason, she was bestowed this honor? "" They lived there briefly and then moved .."" - which year? same year? ""capital of Little Rock, from which Bill conducted .."" - it should be ""capital of Little Rock, from where Bill conducted .."" Fixed. a few sentences after ""Rodham became First Lady of Arkansas, her title for a total of 12 years."", i saw ""In November 1980, Bill Clinton was defeated in his bid for re-election, but returned to office two years"" - when i read the first line, it implied 1978 - 1990, but realised after reading the second sentence, it was 1978-1980 and 1982-1992. can you make this explicit? Fixed. ""...Hillary Rodham Clinton had chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee..."" - chairperson term and years (19xx - 19xx). same for ""Rural Health Advisory Committee"", ""Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families"", ""Arkansas Children's Hospital"" and ""Children's Defense Fund"". I've added years and cites for most of these. Need to be specific on the years on board of private companies - TCBY, Wal-Mart Stores and Lafarge Done. ""As First Lady, Clinton supported women's rights and children's welfare around the world.[1]"" - POV statement and since the source is the whitehouse website, all the more reason to remove it and substitute the text Junked (violated Show, don't tell). "" Clinton hosted numerous White House conferences"" - year? dates? total number? dates of serving on the congress committes - Committee on Armed Services, Committee on Environment and Public Works and Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Done. ""She was audibly booed in an audience of New York firefighters and police officers during her on-stage appearance at The Concert for New York City on October 20, 2001.[54]"" - why? We aren't mindreaders, but basically they were distressed and drunk and she wasn't their type. Best not to attempt an explanation, just describe what happened. The article on the concert goes into greater detail. The reference doesn't actually explain much - I'd look for a different reference and/or re-word or remove the sentence about the booing altogether. The logic doesn't flow in the paragraph - she worked for funding and was booed? (Also, not sure where you got the ""drunk"" from, but it could well be correct. I do agree that we can't speculate on it though and should let a ref explain it.) |talk " +That might remove the issue of it being an advertisement. But is this company even notable? See WP:ORG for the guidellines. +" In my opinion there is a quite a difference between a provoked ""Get Stuffed"" and what the other guy said in return. Maybe he is from a culture where the two terms are regarded as equally offensive; I am not. Over the years I have made many useful contributions. With this episode I reacted badly and instead of backing down as I should of I fought back. Various friends of the other party formed a gang, threatening me over and over with banishment, calling me a loser (User_talk:Petergriffin9901 lmao), a jealous individual, and saying I 'look so dumb right now'. ¬¬¬¬" +" Do you post information about ""good"" things that police officers and departments do? Or just what you term ""misconduct""? Your username suggests you are here for a single purpose. I can't say I disagree with what SummerPhD is saying. " +I dont get it.... you're clearly a bright guy..... Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest Don't write stuff about yourself. Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry. Don't use multiple accounts. Wikipedia:Consensus. Convince the population that you're correct and the article will change. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources Use this kind of stuff for backup. Wikipedia:V#SELF. Something you wrote yourself generally doesn't count. As long as you continue to ignore this, you're never going to be heard, and you do want to be heard. Don't you? People will just assume you're a crackpot. Prove them wrong. +" Copyright problems with Image:Sw1end.JPG An image that you uploaded, Image:Sw1end.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Talk " +"::Well, he may claim that he sees it as evidence of ""anti-Semitism"" on WP, but I don't think this is the case. I have never, ever heard anyone, no matter their ethnic or religious background, complain about the ancestors of Iranians and Indians being called ""Aryans."" And why not? Because that is what they were called! LOL Man, it's just so stupid I can't believe we're even discussing this bullshit to death. Funny thing about the swastika - it's not exactly a holy symbol in Iran, but apparently it's considered a good luck charm. They sell them in a lot of jewelery stores. The first time I saw one, a long while back, I thought to myself, ""WTF is this Nazi shit doing here?!"" I asked the guy (mentioning the Nazi connection) - he had no damn clue as to what the hell I was talking about! " +" The reason I called you a troll was entirely due to your own throwaway disparaging remark about FP@S's so-called 'conduct.' Allegations, like edits, need to be sourced. Diffs are RS. Your remark it amounted to nothing more than a personal attack therefore = trolling. Imperatrix Mundi " +German Ship Prefix of Donau? Hello, I'm planning to write an article about the Donau in German. But can you tell me what the german Ship prefix is? Is it the international prefix SS or the german prefix DS (Dampfschiff = Steam Ship)? I also have a source that writes M/S for Motor Ship, but I think it's wrong because the Donau was a steam ship. +To I finished the draft on fermentation process and sent it to your talk pages. Can you have a look, revise as you want, and decide whether to upload it? +Details Thanks for your help with editing. I hope you didn't mind that I took down a lot of your work suggesting Nawab was overseeing the project at KRL. I don't think and others would have let it stand without references. Also, I found it intriguing how you changed his qualification from first division BSc in Electrical Engineering in 1948 to a BSc in Physics and Chemistry in 1947. It is hard to imagine that the Pakistan Army, Bhutto and Ghulam Ishaq Khan etc would have promoted an EME officer to the rank of major general in 1975 and put him in such a technical position as you are suggesting, without at least a proper degree in engineering. Don't you think? +How is that an attack of any sort? Why are you referring to yourself in Third person? 173.34.108.86 +" he helped inaugurate the national haiku societies of several countries... This article is coming together nicely. I've been toning down some of the more over-enthusiastic language and adding citations, and am now trying to find refs to ""he helped (in 2000) inaugurate the national haiku societies of several countries (Australia, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia)"" which is a fairly substantial claim and so needs support. On the ""about"" page at the website of the Australian Haiku Society mention of Kacian is curiously absent, and we read simply, ""In December, 2000, Australian haiku enthusiasts banded together to form HaikuOz""; regarding Slovenia, we read on the site of the German Haiku Society that ""The Haiku Club of Slovenia (HCS) was set up in September 1997"" i.e. 3 years prior to Kacian's trip; in Serbia, there are two societies: the Aleksandar Nejgebauer Haiku Club was formed in 1993 according to their page on Templibres, and the Serbian Haiku Society was founded in 2004, according to this page on Tempslibres. According to this page on WHC, the Bulgarian Haiku Club was formed in 1999. In light of all the above, we're going to need something more than a statement from Kacian himself if we want to retain this claim. Can anyone help? " +" Note to the section is added. Cheers Wiki me up™" +Wish you get well soon. Nothing that cannot wait and never more important than health. Sorry for disturbing you. My best wishes... +"==Enrique Morente== The sources I have seen say only that he is in a coma and ""brain dead""and this information is already included in the article, with a source. I've seen nothing that expressly says ""he has died"". Under the rules applicable to biographies of living persons, until we have a reliable source, I don't think we can assert a date of death. Thanks. " +" Khorshid, if you want to continue with your intellectually dishonest ""arguments"", be my guest. I didn't violate either civility or NPA standards, I am accurately describing your conduct as dishonest for your attempts to twist the facts about this man. He IS an anti-semite and an unapologetic one at that. " +" How false can be state an issue. Wrong examples given by Mark Romanian word: dînsul/dânsul a comparison with the similar case of the German word: dass/daß! Writing according to a different rule, it doesn't create a new language for this reason! Romanian example German example English Word: Word: Explanation: dînsul/dânsul dass/daß the same word written according to a different rule, it doesn't create a new language for this reason! vârf/vîrf Fluss/Fluß the same word written according to a different rule, it doesn't create a new language for this reason! decât/decît Regress/Regreß the same word written according to a different rule, it doesn't create a new language for this reason! http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da%C3%9F#da.C3.9F_vs_dass http://www.duden.de/neue_rechtschreibung/ Links for enlightenment I will repeat one more time, writing according to a different rule, it doesn't create a new language for this reason! talk & contribs" +" The ¶ beginning ""On the night of January 28, 2012, Occupy Oakland protesters reconvened at Frank Ogawa Plaza, entered and vandalized City Hall …"" is supported by four citations to reputable, third-party published sources. Each of these articles is still accessible online, and each provides embedded video or links to video that enable the Wikipedia reader to see for him or herself what happened. If you honestly believe that this evidence "" has been debunked,"" then it is incumbent upon you to inform the community of Wikipedia editors what led you to this conclusion. Please provide at least one independent, verifiable source to back up your claim. Until then, the only ""outright falsehood"" is your own unsupported accusation of outright falsehood. " +" Ooops! I was tagging all the Iron Maiden tours and albums that needed them on their talk pages, must have pressed edit on the actual article page on that one as I was going through them pretty fast. Thanks for sorting it out ) (talk) " +" Actually, SSRN does no fact checking themselves, it is simply a clearinghouse for already published material. I'm sure you're aware of this. As such, this appears to be simply self-published material, unless you can point to the original point of publication. (talk) " +Will the goons look like Harrison Ford (circa Return of the Jedi) or Ewan McGregor? If so, please send them to my house first. +Saudi Arabia government and islamofascism I see that user:SlimVirgin reverted my edits without motivation. I would like to request her to give this motivation. (Talk | Contribs 25px) +Updating Stub These are the initial set of images proposed to update this stub. +my respect whatsoever. +LOL, I'm watching SVU also its kinda boring. +IDIOT - DEFINITION - YAMLA Yamla has to be one of the worse so called 'administators' that I have ever had the misfortune to get screwed over by. How the hell you managed to get voted in as administrator, only you know, I imagine it was only you in the room that day when the 'votes' were cast. You seem to have no idea on Wikipedia policies, and seem to get some sort of cheap thrill with the power that has been entrusted to you. I just wish they would remove you as administrator as soon as possible, it's a shame users who enjoy the whole Wiki experience have to put up with you power hungry fascist. +Ignoring messages and etc Hi, Wikipedia english relies on multiple points of view and sources - (a) you seem to think certain sources are ok to have claims to the final answer to a complex and contentious issue (b) you appear to not have any knowledge of Indonesian language (c) take care, ignoring messages can lead to the point of being blocked. (d) Take care also you do not come over as a WP:SPA +" . It can be found at |talk]''' " +" North Korea I see that North Korea has been removed from the list twice, on the startling grounds that it is ""no longer communist"". I'm sure there is some kind of technical justification for that - probably that Juche has nominally superceded Marxism-Leninism - but that's pushing a point of pedantry to absurdity. If North Korea is not an example of a communist state in the commonly understood sense, then what is? Certainly not the PRC. At the very least it's bizarre that North Korea warrants no mention at all in the article, but Cyprus apparently does! " +Lower Froth - I think I have had enough dealing with your kind - the Blind Revert Specialist With No Contributions and Getting Too Personal variety. There are much more experienced and mature editors on board here like Aarem and I would prefer talking to them cos all you can do is make me LMFAO. Cheers and have a good day - +I think it would help if you did. Some enforcement regimes are progressive (the arbitrators decide on this in their final decision in the arbitration) and administrators take the history of past infractions into account in calculating a reasonable block period. Tony Sidaway +When the War is over please change the Russian population When the War is over please change the Russian nummber to this 142,800,000 My Source is this http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/01/24/populationdecrease.shtml Thank You ( ) +Yes Franz Kurowski made a stupid generalisation, but I guess in this instance he has been lent a litte authenticity. Yes I see 5/20 is worse. In both cases the number of wrecked aircraft could have been counted. Anyway, I think the article is sound as it is, and we can put this to rest. +" Well, you're using criteria that you have decided constitute a legitimate decision procedure for establishing whether something is Israeli. Content decisions can't be made that way here. I have a decision procedure that enables me to decide who is an idiot and yet annoyingly I am not allowed to deploy it in articles about living people who clearly meet the criteria. ''' - talk''' " +=Biography being well written and encyclopedic I know maybe it'll sound akward, so do try some stuff to make it more out-of-universe. As GA judge the edit button on the article is off limits, but I'll post room for improvement on the article's talk page. Just look at Palpatine maybe, FA character article. +" Help Hello, Tiparrish.I just saw what you asked here at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Account_Deletion. I know that you must be feeling exhausted about the Sock-puppet investigation on going.I must say that you should not worry if your are completely innocent.No actions would be taken against you in such situation.Don't feel worried.If you needed any kind of help on Wikipedia, You can contact me or any other editor on the talk page. | Viwe The Max " +This person has complained about me by e-mail. I am sure that this person is trying to get me banned for being a sockpuppet. Well, this person is correct. I have an alternate account that I have stopped using and I notified an neutral adminstrator of that intention. This alternate account made only 15-20 edits, none of them about Palin, Alaska, or any person but had to stop because it was the recipient of some incivility and accusations of being a sock. Another checkuser and two administrators discussed it and came to the same conclusion as me that I am not a sock. It was agreed that starting a new username was ok to clear my smeared name. Those events were very emotionally trying so I do not wish to go through that again. If that happens, Wikipedia loses because it just chases people away. +The change is seamless. All redirects are being fixed (including quite a few that were missed by people when these were moved in the past). We get these in dribs and drabs over at WP:RM, a few a week. Easier to just clean them up. As for projects, they do not overrule the policy of WP:NAME and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)#Design and usage. Standardization is a good thing. We will continue to grow; these boxes will be used in the future and changing them means when we reach 6 million articles, the future ones that would have used the prior name will use the proper name. Moreover, when people seek to create new infoboxes, just as often or maybe more often they do not learn what the title should be by going to the policy but by looking at where existing, similarly situated templates reside, and by standardizing we foster the creation of new templates at proper names. Please also see Wikipedia:Don't worry about performance. +" I met it just fine until I mentioned my article outside of Wikipedia. You're extending your powers well beyond your realm of control, mall cop. If you wouldn't remove Lil Wayne for saying ""I'm so hot, I'm on Wikipedia"" as a rap lyric in one of his songs, then how can you justify removing a writer? I'm the entire first page for any search engine's results for the name ""Brian Penny"". You want notability? Google me. Maybe check the other pages my name appears on. Are you seriously telling me doesn't work for Bank of America? That you're willing to disregard legitimate government, academic, and media sources simply to prove your rule is a bit totalitarian, IMHO. This is the very definition of personal bias http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bias?&o;=100074&s;=t " +Hello Bergerie. I applied those tags to your article, because of some concerns I had with the language not being written neutrally and the lack of sources. I did actually read your article (we're pretty fast here), so don't worry that those edits were automated. I added the disputed tag because claims were being made without references, but really references is the problem rather than tags so I've removed that particular tag. Finding external links to verify what's said in this article would go a long way towards improving it - please let me know if you need any help. [[User_Talk:FlyingToaster|Toaster]] +" Thanks, Rlevse. WMC also deleted Abd's article talk page comment: . Abd's post to the article talk page is an informative, on-topic and non-disruptive contribution in reply to a question from another editor. I think Abd's comment should be restored to the article talk page. Who would like to have the honours? ☺ " +dishonest in the world. +lets make a separate page to summarize the condition of the Russian economy in the transition period. and this page should be about the current status. +I agree with sophy's duckling. Whoever wrote that America is a police state is an idiot troublemaker and should be put in prison. what thay sead about Cuba makes me think it was probably a joo or a gipsee too. It's about time we see some folks standin' up for what's right on this here wikipedia. Its a good thing that you adminerstraters can block users too. Im glad to see sum folks standin' up for real christian values, real texas values, baby. +I think you're confused. DC had a Captain Marvel (which they bought the rights to), before Marvel had a Captain Marvel. +Surely discussion of the equites as cavalry (as opposed to as a social class) is more appropriate to articles on the military formations (legion etc)? But you are right that the social/political aspect could do with more work. +" I disagree. The point of asking the wider community is so we can begin to work on the article that most of them prefer. If they choose the shorter version or the longer version I will be glad to help improve whichever one they choose. I just don't want to waste my time improving something that I believe is too short unless the wider community can convince me that it is preferred. If they prefer the longer version, then maybe it is you who needs convincing - let's hear from the wider community and find out the answer to that interesting and important question. '''talk " +Your response is nearly identical to your response in the edit summaries, and it doesn't hold any water: 1.) Published sources corroborate that the director's work has been associated with Generation X. If you actually perused those sources, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Solondz' birthday is not relevant: Richard Linklater has also been cited as a Generation X film director and he was born in 1960. 2.) IMDb is a user-edited site, not a reliable source of information, and doesn't even prove your point anyway, and 3.) Your justification for removing the information is based entirely on your personal opinion, just like earlier cases in the article with the Gen X birthyear range. Personal opinion has no place on Wikipedia. +" Okay, thanks. I think I'll wait for all the relevant deletion debates to close before commenting further on the ""Grandmothers."" I'm curious to see how the Wikipedia community does on its own without outside assistance. " +Replying the administrator I didn't understand too shortly, Mr. Administrator. Please understand me clearly. 103.9.114.58 +"HOLY SHIT I""M GAY AS HELL. " +" Death pentaly for drugs Well if you bother to look at the Nutzworld.com link I added, thats where I got the resourced information from! So if you think you can find a better source, go ahead. I was hoping that you can help me improve on the article!!!!!! '''''' " +Hey Kingturtle, I hadn't heard back from you, just wanted to make sure you had gotten my previously reply, and your thoughts. +AfD nomination of MadV An article that you have been involved in editing, MadV, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadV. Thank you. +" Tags Back on February 23, you made some hefty edits to the Santa Claus in Northern American culture article. In captioning some images, you used a few pairs of tags (which in itself didn't affect the size of the text within the captions), but you didn't properly close the tags, so all the text afterwards was made to be really tiny. When you use a tag, you have to close it by typing a slash into the tag, like this: I don't know why nobody noticed that the article was messed up until at least three months later, but I've taken care of it. Also, while I'm at it, when I saw who had made the edit, I was slightly concerned to see the ""bot"" part of your username—it made me worry that someone had programmed a bot to make edits, but that the person hadn't programmed the bot to correctly close tags. I see now that this isn't the case, but have you considered getting your username changed so that you don't cause people to think you're a bot? " +without any information about the forest elephant specifically, it does not need it's own article. +Current image The current image is so small it is worthless. +Oh yeah, I can't wait until this turns into another William II/Edward II/James I article, with LGBTQ freaks co-opting the content with paranoid theories about faggot coverups in the English Royal Family. Fuck you and grow the fuck up. +Hello Big DT Wikipedia had two problems: Catholics want to use it as propaganda tool. And Evangelicals are harassed in every article on religion. Your editions from my articles are unfair and errors,except in the reference to geocities. +Re:disruption Is that a threat? because if it is i'll use the policies to rectify any wrongdoings +Thanks for that, have just notified User:DarthBinky of this account's activity +", 24 August 2007 (UTC) Let's wait until the ABS release the 2006 Urban Locality data from the census - that seems to be a better indicator of what a ""city"" is. Although in any case, changing definitions based on something that is not the Statistical District will affect pages such as List of cities in Australia by population, where to say Newcastle is the 7th biggest city in Australia, for example, may not be correct. 13:44" +":There are any number of people who have criticized Wikipedia after being unable to get their point of view ""properly"" displayed, either because it is not appropriate for Wikipedia, or they are unable to present their view as being from reliable sources. (Few people want to be thought of as ""unreliable"", even though many subject-matter experts may be, unless published.) — (talk) " +" December 2007 (UTC) ""more productive than the first 3 pages on Google""?? - Wikipedia IS the first 3 pages on Google! All other points taken as written. ) 16:04, 18" +I will shove a live tuna fish in your mouth and pull the tail! i am still in love with her. burp. +" First Scottish team? Wikipedia's page on the Champions League, echoing the official information from UEFA, states that the CL began in 1955. Hibernian FC reached the semi final that year. Dundee, Dundee United and Rangers have also reached the semi final. Celtic have won the competition. Unless the final or semi final is somehow not ""the knockout stage"", this ""first Scottish team"" line really must be excised." +" Note to Administrator Regarding Above Move Request To the administrator who will review the above move request. Note that the names used in these articles were chosen after many months of discussions, discussions that included a wide variety of editors. The compromise solution was to use Trentino-Alto Adige/Sudtirol, the Province of Trento, and the Province of Bolzano-Bozen. This was a compromise that kept both the Italian and German usage in the names, and was also the usage in Encyclopedia Britannica (to name just one major English source). There is slander going on above by Mai-Sachme when he says that individuals engineered this solution, or did it by some form of trickery. He also went as far as to erase a similar warning to the reviewing administrator. It is a little shocking, but maybe not surprising, that after a few years a certain editor tries to put things back to how he originally had placed them unilaterally. Right here what we are seeing is nothing less than than a ambush of this page and I strongly suspect that he has contacted a lot of these editors thru e-mail to ask them to come and support this ambush. It is no coincidence that within a couple of days all the German-speaking users who happened to be against the compromise solution show up to vote for this. This is utter abuse of Wikipedia. So, again, if Wikipedia is at all fair, this move request should be struck down. It is FACT that in English both the names Alto Adige and South Tyrol, AND Province of Bolzano are in regular use. Go to any grocery in the United States, and products from this region are advertised as ""wine from Alto Adige"" or ""speck from Alto Adige"". Yet, the same editor who makes this move request (and others who are voting here) has constitently attempted to marginalize the name Alto Adige on this page, or remove its bold typeface next to South Tyrol, or even acknowledge that it is used commonly in English (just review the edits made on these pages over the past year). What it truly shameful is that this cements the fact that there is no room in these particular people's minds for compromise and to a solution that allowed an Italian/German naming convention. Wikipedia is NOT a democracy, and this ambush of the page to try to revert the page to a German-centric viewpoint by sending a dozen German-speaking voters here is just wrong." +i think shes a scientologist. she performed at the scientology event i just watched. +Don't add material without proper citations A basic rule of Wikipedia is verifiability. When adding new material, please use reliable sources and inline citations. In the case of the InfoBox, if the person is either mentioned in the article as having attained the specific position, or that information exists in their article, in verifiable form, than include it. If not, don't include it. +" Precedents are not always correct. The Toonami schedules and whatnot should go too, under WP:NOT#DIR, which is policy and therefore takes precedence over contributor's wishes. —TangentCube /c /t  " +-to-me]] 12:51, 13 February 2010 +well i can guarantee that brazil has more potential to be energy superpower that canada.recentily they discovery a biggest gas reserve in world in santos sao paulo and a big oil reserve too,and brasil has potential energy in other sources like hydroelectricity, have a biggest reserve of uranium in world, believe or not, the future will be witness of brazil energy superpower and brazil superpower,and now start already! +" Arbitrary omission of ""See also"" reference to One-hitter (smoking) Revision as of 20:43, 22 June 2011 (view source)Mjpresson (talk | contribs) (→See also: the ol' one-hitter...RIP) This is one of over a half dozen deletions of ""See also"" references to the One-hitter (smoking) article from various other articles, as if intending to isolate that article from readers and steer them toward joint-smoking instead. Note the apparently taunting editing statement. The same editor has repeatedly deleted from cannabis articles, including this one, (a) photos of small-dosage inhalant utensils which, properly operated, mostly vaporize rather than burn cannabinoids as compared with combustion-based ""joint"" smoking; (b) the Australian Department of Health warning against mixing with tobacco which can lead to ""unintended nicotine addiction"" (this ""traditional"" mixture is considered a prevalent meaning of the word ""joint"" in Europe and some other places, and children investigating cannabis get drawn into a life-shortening habit that has nothing to do with cannabis); (c) any references to articles on wikiHow.com which accurately describe how to make one's own dosage moderation utensils; (d) any possible text describing safer, more economical procedures of cannabis consumption than hot burning cigarette papers. (Not surprisingly the same editor, quoted above, has prosecuted this writer on Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents for attempting to introduce such information.) Admittedly there is a shortage of really clear, descriptive photos of one-hitter utensils available from WikiCommons, and the ones used until now, here and on articles like Cannabis smoking and One-hitter (smoking), were not ideal. Editors are urged to find and supply illustrations that show (a) a really small crater 5.5 mm is best; (b) a long flexible drawtube so users can see what they are doing during the lighting process and get more vaporization, less combustion. The promise inherent in the title ""Cannabis consumption"" includes a duty to inform Wikipedia readers of utensils which (a) are cheaper in initial cost than a plug-in electric vaporizer, though the latter is best; (b) are safer to use and less wasteful of extremely expensive herbal material than cigarette paper; (c) can be made locally ""in your garage"" rather than purchased from monopoly corporations like Tops and Bugler; (d) can be used without adding tobacco (""Toke pure""), thus avoiding risk of ""unintended nicotine addiction"". " +, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Left a reply here. 17:13 +"the developer is a disputed fact that invites a claim by the opposing camp. I have therefore changed ""developer"" to ""eponym"", since there is at least no apparent dispute about the source of the automobile's name. This maintains the familial link with the vehicle without getting into the substantive dispute at the wrong place. 18:09, 2003 Oct 28 (UTC) Thanks, that may at least defuse things a little. My personal thought is that if this is to get any mention on Ferdinand or Ferry Porsche's page the text should relate to them directly, rather than being the same cut and paste sentence. Mentioning that Ferdinand Porsche gets most of the popular credit for a lot of things that were actually as much or more a product of his employees, and pointing out that this is common practice in the design industry the boss gets the credit would be a bit more NPOV. Mentioning Komenda as one of those who gets overlooked in favor of the boss would be OK for me too. 22:46, 28 Oct 2003 (UTC) Before I get any further on this subject, I would like clarificaton about the relative roles of Ferdinand and Ferry in this issue. I would like to see the fact of Ferdinand's univolvement nailed down before I approach the matter of Ferry, or before I try to address the simple revert battle now going on here. The bulk of the story clearly belongs on the Komenda page. A one-sentence reference on the Ferry page saying that Ferry's claim is disputed is appropriate, and it should then refer those who want more on the story to the Komenda page. 01:57, 2003 Oct 29 (UTC) This is the situation that I think is the truth, from my reading. When Ferdinand Porsche set up an independent engineering consultancy in Germany (in the 30s?) although he was the company founder and head engineer he employed a number of other engineers - the jobs were too big for just one man. Among the men he employed was Erwin Komenda, who had previously worked for Daimler-Benz and before that Steyr. Komenda was an expert in auto body construction and the engineering of pressed sheet metal bodywork, that I can determine. Ferdinand Porsche's field of expertise seems to have been the mechanical aspects of vehicles, engines and the like, and the overall team direction. Komenda worked on the bodywork of the KDF-wagen (later to become the Beetle) among others. Komenda definitely worked on translating ideas for the basic shape into sheet metal and the detail design of the bodywork. Many of the plans and patent applications from this period are signed by Komenda and applied for with his name on them. Whether his were the first pencil sketches that were turned into auto bodies I am less sure. It's certainly possible that they were, though I am sure others in the team including Ferdinand Porsche had a lot of input. JUST A THOUGHT: Shouldn't this page consider division into chapters: (i.e.) Early Life WWI WWII Porche is a fascinating man with a career so linked with the World Wars but that almost seems lost and in this bio. His involvement in WWII with the Nazis in both the Racing circuit and in the War effort really shaped his life and that that of the world. He represents a true place in history - so perhaps a chapter insersion could better work here. Just a suggestion. DH - 10/16/05 Postwar, Porsche's son Ferry and the other engineers who had worked for Ferdinand during the war came together (initially in Austria) to design cars. Ferdinand was imprisoned until 1949 for war crimes relating to the use of slave labor in projects he worked on. Between them, a car was designed that became the Porsche 356. Komenda played a big part in this. It would be incorrect to say that he was the designer, per se, because he only worked on the bodywork. However, its construction was his, and probably much of its styling. He also worked in a similar capacity for later Porsche cars. What I think needs to be done is to write more about Ferdinand's consultancy and Ferry's postwar sports car company so Komenda can be placed in his proper context. WHen part of a larger article it will seem less 'heavy'. Protected In this case, it's rather difficult to revert to a pre-edit-war version. Since there's no getting around the fact that I agree with Wik that the link should not be included, I have protected the page on a version including the link, to avoid the perception of bias. I've seen both Wik and Lir resort to edit wars (not infrequently with each other), and there's something you both need to understand: '''edit wars are +" It was suicide Admin - Why you delete my section here?! We made a deal to keep it just 2 days. You close it - what other you want?! Is the truth not interesting for you?! My information is VERY SERIOUS - is not speculation. I'm almost never wrong. They know from beginning what happen but they lie. Radar data showed to them exactly when a HUMAN was controlling the plane and when FLIGHT ENVELOPE PROTECTION SYSTEM do it. ""Usually pilots(one after other) go to the toilet 2-3 minutes after reaching of cruise altitude. Suitable time for suicide when one pilot left alone in the cabin of the plane."" By the way as I said in my blog probably the pilot from inside ""WAS NOT SILENT"" May be, he spoke something AGAINST LUFTHANSA and now they hide it. ""(wild guess) Do you know that probably now they listen from a cockpit voice recorder (CVR) first ""SUICIDE NOTE MESSAGE"" left behind before a pilot has committed suicide? In it, he explains the reasons for his actions."" What exactly these section for SUICIDE here in TALK, not in main article - make you angry?! I don't understand. It is time for you to start DISCUSSING about it. http://encheveg.blog.bg/technology/2015/03/25/what-is-the-truth-about-germanwings-flight-9525-crash.1348923 " +Commonwealth Realm Protected Status +(Greenland has fascinating scenery just like Alaska) +And how is it not civil? I didn't insult you in any fashion. I was merely pointing out how this message ended up here when I know you usually patrol every move someone makes on an article and its talk pages. Disagreeing with someone is not uncivil. +Absolute failure So after years of tinkering and picking fights on Wikipedia you've been reduced to fucking around with hyphens. Not exactly the culmination of a dazzling career, was it? 87.115.23.31 +New discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mining#Infobox_part_II. Good thinking. +That wasn't me. I never removed that sentence, and I am perfectly indifferent to it. +I continue to disagree, and think this is inappropriate coverage of a peripheral issue. Ditto with the material on SB. No point arguing it here, so I am listing it at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard to see what others think . '''''' ( talk ) +Color Patents Is it possible to patent a color? 03:10, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) +"I say remove the sentence. Here's why, and I think my idea may be novel. Yes, some said ""I hate Muslims."" However, we need to look at the context. In the heat of a demonstration regarding a certain limited issue, they shouted ""I hate Muslims"". There is no evidence that they hate Muslims generally. There are many, many Muslims in the world and all of them cannot be put into the little box that represented those involved in the demonstration. So by putting what they shouted at a demonstration against a relatively limited few in the lead paragraph without proper contextualization, the implication is made that they hate all Muslims, not just those involved in the demonstration, and that would violate various Wiki policies. " +" Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Four Courts. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  444  " +Update: The hpathy.com refutation is self-published, too, and needs to be removed. I found some more appropriate responses in the published alternative/homeopathy journals. +Aquí se hablan IPA Greetings, ! As I'm a reprobate IPA dropout from waaaaay back who's trying halfheartedly to recover some of my prior fluency,* it occurred to me you might like this gentle guide if you haven't yet tried it. Take your time; it starts falling into place after a while. *Favorite IPA application since graduation: annotating choral lyrics in foreign languages aided by a native speaker, then correcting the pronunciation of my section mates during choir rehearsals. +"::::::::::I don't see how you can claim consensus when it appears that you are the only editor in support of your change. The comma issue is separate from your push to impose changes which stand in the face of the long agreed-upon version of the lead. ~ (talk|contribs) " +dick face go fuck your dick +Hey What I know is that: the medal tables are filled anyway, because in the same article I'm seeing tables with different medal and time orders. So do not talk to me about rules. You, when you fill the meda tables, not follow and don't observe the actually order of the frames. I'm arranging them in a logical way: order of importance of the medals (gold-silver-bronze) + date order (first to last medal). What are you complaining about? I'm just fixing a giant mess. +Kuebie as per wikipedia civility guidelines, please modify your tone or find yourself the subject of an ANI report that will suggest that you are blocked from editing - constructive comments are more than welcome, however your comments are argumentative and not acceptable. +Comparison of layout engines +Indian religions Assistance needed on that page. An adamant nutcase is accounting for a lot of orthodox views there, saying Jainism co-existed with Vedic period and is as old as 2500 BC or even the Indus Valley civilization. Usko talk page par I tried to make him see sense, but he is a total chartered vandal. +" Bias ""I've been having to deal with an increasing problem with drink and drugs, and the time has come to get the professional help I need to sort myself out."" Why have you deemed this quote irrelevant? - " +" I can only apologise for my prior tone; please accept my heartfelt apologies. I'm sure neither of us wants those discretionary sanctions slapped on me! ""You seem to be under the impression..."" I feel my actual purpose has been misunderstood, for it was not my intention to claim it was your responsibility to make the corrections you deemed necessary. If you don't want to make an edit, don't—Wikipedia participation is entirely voluntary, after all. What I had meant to do, as I thought was clear, was infer—incorrectly, I am told—the depth of your concern from your inaction. ""I don't think 972mag is..."" You are entitled to your opinion of +972, of course, but the root source was the Twitter feed of Ofir Gendelman. I always try to learn from my mistakes, and so I'll make sure next time to put a url to the root source to save us both some typing. ""[Y]ou used 'sardonic' where the source uses 'sarcastic The source? only one? I see two, the first of which describes it as a 'mocking' letter. I simply felt the word took into account the aggregate description of the letter's content. I felt this complaint was unwarranted, but it was dutifully attended to without reflection by Jabotito48. To his credit, his actions indicate that he too disagrees with your implied view that someone only cedes responsibility for a section of an article when they have written strictly less than or equal to fifty percent of its content. ""The source you used as a ref for the Netanyahu statement..."" Indeed. Upon inspection, it appears I cited the wrong Times of Israel article. I thank you sincerely for bringing the mistake to my attention, and it has been dealt with. INN is generally an unacceptable source; however, for something so small, I couldn't see the harm. I am forced to concede one point: ""It's a simple matter of the article saying what the source says."" For some reason, my instinctive reaction is to immediately attempt to contradict you. On this occasion, I should have agreed with you. ""[W]e're at 3:0 at this point"", thus the tag may be there for quite a while!~ " +Sales information == If anyone wants to know where the 14 million copies for X & X-2 comes from: http://www.jp.square-enix.com/company/ja/news/2013/html/cea4547d66edba7a424ff516c8715511.html == +" Generally speaking, the births of descendants of QV are generally noted as such (or trivially determinable as such). The birth announcements can not, obviously ""rank"" any order of succession as it is constantly in a state of flux. But the descendants are determinable, and generally noted as such by reliable sources (births in The Times should be acceptable?) Lastly - the idea is to keep this from becoming an en-dash v. em-dash v. hyphen v. proportional dash v. whatever ArbCom nightmare as quickly as possible. Life is too short to waste on debates which end being of less than even academic significance IMO. Cheers. BTW, makes specific reference to all male lines descended from QV, making this a ""notable category"" per se (using a common name for the family). We do not even have to say more. " +"==Your edits made on May 16, 2007 (UTC) to Garry Lyon== Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Garry Lyon. Please be more careful when editing articles provide an edit summary, so that others will not revert it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. '''''' 干什么？ · VDemolitions " +Seating Capacity Some foolish people told me to discuss here first. No problem! Ok, I am extremely sure that there are two typical types of 3-class seating of A340-200, which are 239 and 261. According to the main page of Airbus, the seating capacity is shown as 240, which is rounded up from 239. Also, I cited a lot of relevant and reliable sources. Please foolish people, if you know nothing about this topic, please do not revert edits which are actually thr truth. Or else, you should really feel ashamed of yoursevlves. +Author of the article obviously dedicated a significant amount of time to writing it. I would say that to increase accessibility, the intro needs to be scaled down significantly in accordance with WP:LEAD. +(Talk) +ass bleed todeath slowly. so their sexuall pleasure was fufilled like no ther and they were satisfyed but there lust would end them +Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers]] [[ +worchester is the team proposed or real? +"Israel is ""partially recognized states"" why you should be blocked " +Mike Garcia, again Mike Garcia has been acting up again, this time on System of a Down, only a little while after your block. He refuses to cite a source for his information. +Thanks for sorting this out for me. For the record I thought I would just comment here that a sock puppet had set up an account using my user name on the Simple English Wikipedia which resulted in the block. This account has now been usurped and I have successfully claimed my user name on the Simple English Wikipedia. I have also set up a single-user log-in (SUL) for my various Wiki accounts to ensure that no one else will be able to impersonate me in the future. +Medium (spirituality) Can you judge whether the edits by Keeton193 make any sense in the article? His previous few edits got reverted with some unflattery remark, he may be just trying. +" Polish and (unfortunately for me) Silesian and German sources about Silesian language is very biased and very incompetent. Poles, Silesians and Germans are a party in a case. Only count source neutral (American, English, Spanish or other). ""Silesian-Polish war? Huh?"" - can see that you're a new user, there was a war from 2007. ""Silesian are Poles"" - can see that you're a dunce, only part Silesians considered to be Poles, rest is Silesian (separate nation), Germans and Czech. PS. Now, mostly Silesians live in Germany (3-5 million, however in Poland - only 0.8 to 2 million). ""SILESIA IS IN POLAND! You will not change it."" - can see that you're from cave or moon, Silesia lies in Poland, Germany and Czech Republic. Not only Poland but you as poles try to use propaganda and lies. " +" I have unblocked you, Eddie, as I discussed on User talk:NSLE. Accusing NSLE of assuming bad faith regarding yourself is a hair's breadth away from assuming bad faith regarding NSLE himself: watch it. NSLE does not assume bad faith regarding you; I believe he just thinks you have a knack for disruptive editing and show some real immaturaty, as with your recent edits to Eddie. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) I removed that comment, I'm upset because NSLE always catches Me on ""bad"" edits, and threatens to bring those up if I ever want to RFA. NSLE if You don't like those edits, please delete them, lets forget about them, as You did with Survivor: Exile Island. , Monday March 6 2006 at 05:21" +Comments Don't remove my comments from discussions pages. +I'm sorry. I realise I should not have done that. Thank you for not being harsh and too strict. +Thanks I was about to make a comment on your page when i saw you reverted yourself. Thanks again. +silly little boy my ass +Just a note to say I hope you keep up the good fight to make sure the links stay on the Spider page. HiDrNick seems like an awful bully. Don't let him get you down! 198.204.92.193 +I got around to making the changes. They may be reverted by the time you see them though, hopefully the talk page conversation will have comments from the reverter in it. +Thank you What a great article. Thanks to everyone who participated. I appreciate it. +" Give it up, you're ""pissing in the wind"" against ""established editors"" with WP:OWN issues who will ""revert"" you into oblivion... Not worth it." +another article ive stumbled across of debatable notability, looks like it needs to be deleted +" That was uncalled for... I had no problem that you blocked anonymous users for editing my talk page (including me) but, that was totally uncalled for that you took down ""this guy is cool"" and said it was inaccurate. You have no business judging whether a comment like that is accurate or inaccurate. You are an Admin for Wikipedia and I respect that but, that dose not mean you are anything more.99.137.208.196 " +Hi! welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful: Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page. To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use TAB~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes). You can experiment in the Sandbox. For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects... I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log. | talk +your record indicates that you were banned as a vandal several times and asked for a defense several times. Also, your record indicates that Bertil videt asked you to revert some legitimate changes without reason and you did it because he asked you, vandalazing good content that did not suit him or you. You should talk. Also please read your own talk page regarding many other warnings given to you by other users. +REDIRECT Talk:Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi +" CTE: Live Hey, next time you correct a tracklisting (which is admirable) as you did on the Countdown to Extinction: Live article, could you include a new citation, and re-do any writing credits or any other relevant material that you remove? I originally wrote that bit up (going from a source with a bad tracklisting, apparently), and putting all the ""original album"" stuff, and writing credits was tedious work. I just sat down and re-did the work - time consuming and not fun. My point is, if you're not going to bother to do the fix properly, just don't do it at all. Post it in talk instead, and let someone else do it right. " +As this is described as a decentralized social network, with no corporate affiliation and based off of volunteers, it seems entirely irrational to dismiss citations from people, on the grounds that they support it. +Why did you fuck my post on julianfuckton? 182.16.240.42 +": I found another source. An anthology published in 2004 includes a story by ""Cassandra Claire."" You can verify this by looking at the the last which I linked to Amazon as that Amazon record has a ""Look Inside"" for the book. Cassandra Claire is credited on the table of contents, in the story which runs from page 59 to 76, and the ""About the authors"" on page 290 which says ""Cassandra Claire is a twenty-something writer living in New York City, where she has painted her apartment green. She has loved fantasy since her father introduced it to her when she was a child. This is her first published story."" Also, we don't have a WP:RS for ""Cassie Claire"" yet and so I'd propose adding ""(Formerly Cassandra Claire)"". |talk " +From the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia: black codes, in U.S. history, series of statutes passed by the ex-Confederate states, 1865–66, dealing with the status of the newly freed slaves. They varied greatly from state to state as to their harshness and restrictiveness. Although the codes granted certain basic civil rights to blacks (the right to marry, to own personal property, and to sue in court), they also provided for the segregation of public facilities and placed severe restrictions on the freedman's status as a free laborer, his right to own real estate, and his right to testify in court. Although some Northern states had black codes before the Civil War, this did not prevent many northerners from interpreting the codes as an attempt by the South to reenslave blacks. The Freedmen's Bureau prevented enforcement of the codes, which were later repealed by the radical Republican state governments. +September 2015 (UTC) Oppose for now I agree that when the article gets big enough is when we should split it. For now, having a section in this article for each of the days would be enough. 07:29, 18 +" Re: Restoring Doright's Talk Page Folks, I do not intend to pursue this point. I restored the page because I thought blanking was against the rules and we were supposed to do that. In fact, I once had a user restore my talk page I had blanked in the process of archiving it. Since JayG reverted it, I assumed I was in error here and just dropped the matter. The above warning is a case in point as to why user talk pages should be archived and not blanked. As Homes said, it is certainly out of place. Well, you can certainly look at my talk page archives if you want to see why I do not intend to engage either Doright or Mantanmoreland on this. Wyneken(talk) " +I haven't tried it, but perhaps the {{pad}} template could be useful, as documented at Help:Wiki_markup#Format. +I suppose that it falls under WP:SELF - meta is a sister project. Although i do admit that it is a bit of a proof that some people do use it. As a matter of due diligence i notified +As long as you didn't start the article, feel free to remove the tag. If you later discover you were in error, you can always slap the tag back on to put it back in the queue. (This is one of only two times replacing a speedy deletion tag is permissible. (The other being article creator removal.)) +Give me a break Give me a break, admin! I was just trying to talk to the dude! Why did you delete my message from his talk page? Why don't you leave it up to him to decide what's to be deleted from his messages or not? I just asked him why he deletes things so speedily using a very gay sounding software called huggle. What's the matter with you, wikipedia lovers? Are you robots or something? Is that all you do all day? Wikipedia seems to have taken control of your lives. I bet this post will be reverted using Huggle or Twinkle or something like that, or you'll issue me a stern warning not to make unconstructive edits to the pive pillars of wikipedia, or you'll just block me. Listen. Stop being a robot. Become a human for a change. Get out of that chair and think about it a little. +I read an interesting essay once, entitled: The Pre-Med as a Metaphor of Antipathy. The author was (IIRC) a basic-science professor trying to understand why pre-meds were such jerks, and whether the qualities selected for by the pre-med process were necessarily the ones that would make for an exemplary physician. Taking the pre-med curriculum was among the most depressing experiences of my life - a relentlessly grinding, competitive exercise in rote memorization of material that held little interest or applicability for me. I felt bad for people who took organic chemistry and biology because they were actually interested in those subjects - they were trampled in a horde of people who had come from the top of their high school classes and were trying to beat the curve, inexorably normed to a C+/B-, to get into med school.I certainly witnessed a reasonable amount of cheating, and I'm sure there were more egregious things happening out of plain sight. I was amazed, when I took the MCATs, at the level of security and anti-cheating measures in place. They did basically everything except a retinal scan, but I suppose such things are necessary. The question, of course, is whether such learned behaviors and coping mechanisms can be switched off. '''''' Talk +don't edit the Upton page again. If you vandalize it again you will be banned. +Wikipedia New York Meet-Up Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC +German offer of immunity == I repeat what iser Yannismarou deleted: Simultaneously the Greek government rejected a German offer of immunity from invasion in return for neutrality. p.174 I have credited the source. You can read this book for yourself. I am not saying the Greeks were not heroic, or did something bad, just reporting the German offer, which was probably tantamount to capitulation anyway. I realize Wikipedia is a cartoon version of a real encyclopedia, as it's not peer reviewed, so I'm afraid my entry will be deleted again. In any event, hopefully this Talk fragment will remain. == +" You seem to misunderstand the intent of my query on page protection. Obviously this page is not one to be permanently protected. Therefore, sooner or later, it is going to have to be unprotected. To do so, given the pattern of interaction, it would be advisable to get buy-in from the key editors of the article. Yes, I am into process when it comes to disputes. That's why we have policies and guidelines: to assist us all. Without underestimating the value of the contribution of admins, Wikipedia has been built on the contributions of its editors. It is these folks that will continue to assure its success. As to whether I am a ""long-term editor"" of this page: My first edit was in July 2005 and I have made a total of over 20 edits since then. While not a high contributor, I like to think that my contributions have been of value. Most of my contributions to Wikipedia over the years have been substantive. However, I have mediated many disputes and have found the policies invaluable in that. Here's another one for you to think about: Assume good faith. " +Attention Used Asswipe For the love of God, please stop banning my accounts from seeing the light of day. So far, you managed to murder Steven1350, Steven13500, and Steven135000. Now I am forced to use Steven1350000, and believe me, those zeros can grow to be quite lengthy if you keep banning me. Believe me, I can get so many unique IP address' that banning me is a waste of time (since you see I am already on my 4th user account [and I couldnt care less for your policy on that]). Showing off my number of banned accounts to all my friends is fun, so if you wanna play it that way, remember that you have an audience rooting for you And another thing. You wiki admins are all Caption retards. In the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mattkachu , you claim that Mattkachu==Steven1350. This is completly wrong....and you should use powersander to take the idiocy from your face. Please feel free to comment on my usertalk page, as I am in dire need of a good laugh from an nice empty threat you people like to send me so often. PS....do you have any peanut butter, cuz I could go for a nice PB & J sandwich about now Cheers, +Hello I made few disruptive edits to Article to make you guys realise that it needs to be protected. Thanks 123.201.175.123 +Budget In the infobox is written that the budget was $1,200,000 (est.). But in the article itself is written that Spanish extras cost was $1,600,000. +First, if you think refs to Tome of horrors could save these articles from being deleted (or more likely redirected) in AfDs, you're wrong. Tome of Horrors is material officially licenced and authored by Wizards of the Coast, it is thus a primary source affiliated to the subject or its creator, it cannot be used to establish notability and won't be of any use in AfDs. It is not your inclusion of these refs that prompted me to redirect the articles, but the fact that they are non-notable because based only on primary sources, and that there is already a consensus at the D&D; project and at several AfDs to redirect. There are hundreds of these non-notable monster articles so yes, redirects are more convenient and less time-consuming than 400 AfDs, but don't delude yourself into thinking they would survive AfDs otherwise. Add refs from Tome of Horrors if you want, but it won't save articles from redirection, whether by bold editing or AfD. If there was no ground to redirect them, then you wouldn't be afraid to draw attention on them. +Ok fine blocked for 30 days im sure i will cope..but i still would really like to know why i got blamed for the past edits on the football club pages when it wasnt me..? +Neil, as per your advice, I responded to all the charges in detail, and the result is I am blocked for a week ? Can you comment on this ? +" is gary really 4'8""? I saw Gary in person once and he didn't look anywhere near 4'8"". This photo from the 80's he looks like he's possibly shorter than 4' tall. In this '99 photo is waist is about as high as an auto bumper . " +Medvedev's advisers I thought Medvedev would stop short of recognizing after yesterday's political show in the two chamber Federation assembly. But he didn't. The decision seems amazingly ill prepared and leaves Medvedev with a legacy he'd probably better be without. So my qestion is: Does Medvedev rely on exactly the same team of advisers as Putin did? Or did Putin de facto take with him the foreign policy to the Moscow White House? Is this the first hint of the expected power struggle between Putin and Medvedev - or is Medvedev just a puppet, temporary in charge till Putin can regain the office of President of Russia? 217.21.232.237 +Try it, see what happens. You dickless, cum-eating faggot! +" User talk page protection Your user talk page has been protected since 2010, in apparent violation ofthe policy which only allows for semi-protection for a ""short duration"". If you believe the policy is wrong or inapplicable then please suggest alternative language for it. Otherwise, please remove the protection. Also, the link to this page is not visible onyour regular talk page, which is also a violation. I'm sure that both violations were inadvertent, and that you'll either comply or seek to change the policy. Thanks. 108.91.78.61 " +copy right dear Ironholds, The Owner will release using of map in wikipedia. i have sent him a message, and he agree the using of maps in wikipedia. so we will have NO problems to use them here. thank you for your help +" Please review the guidelines and policies that govern biographical articles, especially those involving living persons. ''''''chatspy " +So, do we need a source that MDs prescribe drugs or do surgeries? Do we need a source stating in France they speak French? You did delete systematic reviews too, as well as common knowledge (i.e. chiropractors learn manipulative and other conservative therapies in school). What exactly do you dispute? +PENIS VAGINA YOU SUCK FAGGOT ASSHOLES AT WIKIPEDIA +":No objection here, go for it! idle vapourings of a mind diseased " +List of motion and time sequence analysis related concepts I think this proposed deletion could be controversial, and also useful as a list, so I removed your prod. I agree with the other prods, mostly, so I haven't deprodded those. +I count 30 reverts by various editors on Botswana Ground Force, nearly all of them related to reverting an Isreal-based anon IP who inserts fantastical information; although the IP changes from time to time, the modus operandi does not. It happened again this morning, after your comment above. The warnings seem to have no effect, although perhaps you could consider a short block on +" This shouldn't be allowed to continue. The author of this article has his main focus clearly defined. It is the so-called ""controversey"" around the site. This leads me to believe that he was kicked off the site and/or his stories deleted and he is using wikipedia to ""get back"". This 'free' online encylopedia isn't a stage to enact vengence, it's to provide UNBIASED information on the subject. True this subject points out that it has ""one million stories"", but it doesn't say anything positive and instead focuses on the negative. If the creator can't be unbiased he should step aside and let worthy people write about this. This would NOT be me, as fanfiction.net is one of my favorite sites." +To the Editors To Beeblebrox: Star Wars was an independent film made on a low budget and since then has had two sequels, three prequels, two animated series, an animated film, multiple video games, a whole bunch of books, and was George Lucas' third film. To Acroterion: Maybe I made a mistake, but FisherQueen still blocked something I was on when I just said patiently that my blog was more reliable than most sources on this site which is true because you get your info from sites that sometimes do not have any thing to do with the makers of the films. To FisherQueen: I am sorry that I told you that you were worse than one of the worse people I know, but if you saw the worst person I know you would laugh in relief. But there is the fact that before I said that, you blocked me because of unknown reasons. Please tell me why I was originally blocked just because I said that my sources were reliable and that I did not like being called a girl. To All of You: I realize that I wrote stupidly, but there is still the fact that my film is very well written and will be in theaters most likely. Also, FisherQueen is not very patient, because she blocked me for no apparent reason. My page deserves to be up as much as the Bloons page deserves to be up and the pages for stuff that isn't even as far along as my film is. Taking down the page for Sammy G wasn't too smart either because he has a promising future in rapping. Maybe I should not have put up one for me but that one and the one for my movie did not need to be deleted. The film is very likely to get into theaters. +" If I may be of assistance here. Persephone was the name given to a beyond Pluto ""planet"" by astrologer Dane Rudhyar, probably in the 1960s or 1970s. MARDYKS 63.232.20.2 " +" ""Duesberg doesn't conduct research on HIV. He never has. Neither does Kary Mullis. Neither does the Perth Group."" ""Russian biologists don't conduct research on Michurinism. They never have."" ""Evolutionists don't conduct research on Intelligent Design. They never have."" ""Einstein doesn't conduct research on the photoelectric effect or Brownian motion. He never has."" 69.45.178.143 " +As for that 3RR tag on my user page I put it there. LOL! +Hi, I do not want to abuse the unblock tool. But I will contribute to wiki with a lot of patience from now on. +I see you yourself did my work For that reason you are off my revenge list. Wnan join da dark side and be friends? You wont regret it. From dodo. Now time to vandalise other people. +Medical web site design A tag has been placed on Medical web site design, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (Talk) +" Correct that you haven't ""wandered off"", correct that I didn't know you were addressing The Pink Oboe's entire editing history in the one diff to his talk page, and for ""cleaning house"": money > mouth > Stephan Schulz. No way is this ""civility"" business ever going to be anything but a double standard and a joke if Malleus gets blocked for ""arse"" while admins can tell two editors to ""shut the fuck up"" and not an eyelash is batted an AN. If we're serious, let's start where the problem starts (admin abuse and double standards in enforcement of civility and personal attacks). (Talk) " +Romanianlies/truths Hi Lsorin! I see that you've been blocked indefinitely from editing all Coanda related articles! That's too bad! Of course, that is exactly what you suggest above should happen to that brilliant editor Romanianlies. Since it took you so long to get yourself banned in this way I suppose you can now appreciate how hard it would have been to get a wonderful individual like him blocked like this. I see from your above entries that you're convinced that he's been controlling the thoughts and actions of other wikipedians. Do you think he used his power to bend the will of others to get you blocked? but then again, since you compare him above to that old ally of the Romanian people, Adolph Hitler, maybe you think of him as a good friend, and would never accuse him of doing such a thing. Would you like me to ask him for you? By the way, if you find any more information that helps to expose the pathetic lies of Coanda please let me know. I'll be only to glad to post it for you so the whole world can see that Coanda only made many lies with no prouve. +" Thanks for the review. I'm doing my best so no-one will need to know Norwegian to learn ""everything"" about rail transport in Norway ;) (talk) " +"Just in case, an article (in Russian) questioning the nozzle construction of Apollo lunar modules (a part of series including e.g. photos of ""lost"" BP-1227 being returned to the US). It's unclear which ""computer program"" is used for calculations therein but at least the initial numbers (both factual and estimated) as well as calculated ones might come interesting for someone who was partial to the US Moon affairs if such folks still hit such pages, of course. ) " +" The claim that DDP meets the criteria for the EBT designation is a very questionable one, as I recently pointed out in a letter to the editorial board of the Child and Adolescent Social Work journal, cc'd to Becker-Weidman. My comments on the nature of evidentiary bases, especially as they relate to Becker-Weidman's publication, will shortly be posted on www.childrenintherapy.org under the title ""EBT or not EBT?"" I would appreciate editing of this page to include any rebuttal to those remarks that Becker-Weidman may be able to provide. Proof by assertion is not acceptable evidence, and if Wikipedia permits simple assertions on controversial issues, it may as well declare itself a blog. Jean Mercer." +Also, do not add pixel sizes to thumbnail images. This allows the settings in a user's preferences to determine the size at which the picture is displayed. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask. +with many stories in cinema +Did Softlavender pulled the tooth of the lion? Incredible. +Home Soundtrack Can you show me the website which shows the tracklisting then? 81.148.240.181 +" Speedy deletion of Dorantoligy A tag has been placed on Dorantoligy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. " +They do speak English I hope hence a message to them in English will tell their reasoning. When there is a will there is a way... is one of my favorite quotations. I have changed the picture with 16th century calligraphy and hoping the people who wish to censor the reality will come are revert. They should not censor the relality. - +" well it not really believing the article as much as was he ever really called by that name =^-^=;""I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight"" comment added by (talk • contribs) " +http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/2-279-calories-per-person-how-israel-made-sure-gaza-didn-t-starve.premium-1.470419 +" Sohar I'm going to assume that you simply aren't familiar with policy, and used the term ""vandalism"" in error. Stop changing ""Gulf"" to ""Persian Gulf"". It's unnecessary, and in the case of Sohar incorrect. If you continue this pointless crusade I'll escalate this through dispute resolution. Cheers, This flag once was red " +Fair enough. How about instead of replacing the text of this talk page, I just append to it? I'm just talking here. I'm talking about how Wikipedia editors can be wankers, but I'm still just talking. This is an open discussion about how the users at this IP address think Wikipedia has an inordinately large population of wankers. All are invited. Except the editors at the Penny Arcade forums. They're even worse. Discuss. +" First, no, the passage states that Mustafa Zayd counted X instance of abrogation from some exegetesis, this is clear if you actually read (Mustafa Zayd, Al-Nasikh fi al-Qur'an al-Karim, vol2. pp.507-508), and again ""pp. 115-116 and 120"" of Fatoohi book don't contain anything that states that Mustafa Zayd considered 140 verses to have been abrogated by Q.9:5. You distorted facts, I need explanations for that. Second, you keep referring to Iryna Harpy when she actually stated: ""My apologies, but I'm currently involved in other article disputes to the point of not knowing how to prioritise my time. More to the point, I am not in a position to engage in extensive reading in order to familiarise myself with the details of the subject matter in order to be able to give a reasonably qualified NPOV opinion. "" " +" I take some exception to what you're saying, Xander, though I agree with it in bulk. While there is artistic licence for an heraldic artist to interpret the blazon broadly, I am not at all familiar with any convention allowing for adding embellishments. Can you please provide a reference for same? I am completely unaware of any convention which allows an heraldic artist to add elements that are not described in the blazon. The arms are the blazon, period, and nothing more or less. Beyond My Ken, perhaps a better way to explain this to you... you think the representation of the arms is what matters, yes? That is not in fact the case. Blazons are much more like recipes; Mrs Fields has a single recipe for e.g. their chocolate chip cookie. That is the important thing. Anyone, possessing the recipe, could make a reasonable facsimile thereof. So there's that. However, this is all fairly abstruse heraldic knowledge which not a lot of people know, which gives us the problem you are having; you feel that presenting a given cookie as a Mrs Fields cookie is inappropriate unless it was actually made by Mrs Fields. In one sense, you're right, but you're only right out of totally understandable ignorance of how heraldry works. All that being said, it is true that there are 'official' coats of arms inasmuch as they are the ones approved for use by the holder of the arms. For example, the representation of the Arms of Canada currently in use has been personally approved by The Queen and is thus 'official' for government use. And with all of that being said: the reference in question does not support the adornments added to the image. It supports only the blazon, and any depiction which follows only the blazon is both heraldically correct and properly sourced. →  ₪  " +and since it was free. I transcribed it for you. Here it is again. 1 See, any hope [of capturing] him must be disappointed; One is prostrated by the very sight of him. 2 There is no one so fierce as to rouse him; Who then can stand up to Me? 3 Whoever confronts Me I will requite, For everything under the heavens is Mine. 4 I will not be silent concerning him Or the praise of his martial exploits -Meaning in Hebrew Uncertain- 5 Who can uncover his outer garment? Who can penetrate the folds of his Jowls? 6 Who can pry open the doors of his face? His bared teeth strike terror. 7 His protective scales are his pride, Locked with a binding seal. 8 One scale touches the other; Not even a breath can enter between them. 9 Each clings to each; They are interlocked so they cannot be parted. 10 His sneezings flash lightning, and his eyes are like the glimmerings of dawn. 11 Firebrands stream from his mouth; Fiery sparks escape. 12 Out of his nostrils come smoke As from a steaming, boiling cauldron. 13 His breath ignites coals; Flames blaze from his mouth. 14 Strength resides in his neck; Power leaps before him. 15 The layers of his flesh stick together; He is as though cast hard; he does not totter. 16 His heart is cast hard as a stone, Hard as the nether millstone. 17 Divine beings are in dread as he rears up; As he crashes down, they cringe. 18 No sword that overtakes him can prevail, Nor spear, nor missile, nor lance. 19 He regards iron as straw, Bronze, as rotted wood. 20 No arrow can put him to flight; Slingstones turn into stubble for him. 21 Clubs are regarded as stubble; He scoffs at the quivering javelin 22 His underpart is jagged shards; It spreads a threshing-sledge on the mud. 23 He makes the depths seethe like a cauldron; He makes the sea boil like an ointment-pot. 24 His wake is a luminous path; He makes the deep seem white-haired. 25 There is no one on land who can dominate him, Made as he is without fear. 26 He sees all that is haughty; He is king over all proud beasts. In its original context, verbatim, as from the publisher. I guess you cannot afford real books under this utopian obama administration? I thought they increased the welfare budgets? +2007 (UTC) Yes What's the big fuss, it happend 60 years ago and was a big, boaring 'yawn'!}} 06:26, 2 February +=Nordicism Then how do you explain the fact that to be in the Waffen SS you had to prove your Aryan lineage going back 5 generations and the fact there were not only Nordics but also many Slavs and Mediteraneans in it. +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (talk) " +no i didnt what evidenve made u think that +REDIRECT Talk:List of cities in West Bengal by population +But none of these capitals, i.e. Tokyo, London, can be called just a city, because they are not. They are municipalities, metropolitan regions, greater areas, etc. What you said above is basically personal commentary, which doesn't have much to do with this article. However, it still doesn't explain the fact why the GDP figures are even in the infobox. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fiona Shaw. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +Hi Noah, Thanks for your reply. I have found most of the answers to my questions on that lhc website quoted earlier, link and for other questions I've visited physicsforum. I agree there is a safety issue to the lhc, as imho the reference for cosmic rays isn't water tight, and we are surpassing the energies of normal cosmic rays, setting off violent sparks in a lively environment. greetings, +oh look at me im popular. ok jessgay +REDIRECT Talk:National Liberation Front of Corsica +" What does ""KISS"" stand for? " +" Previous fight SHould we list the previous UFC fight the fighter was in? Example: NameNicknameUFC RecordPrevious UFC Fight Frank Mir12 - 5 W- UFC 119 vs Mirko Cro Cop Cheick KongoKongo8 - 4 - 1 D- UFC 120 vs Travis Browne Mirko Cro CopCro Cop4 - 4 L- UFC 119 vs Frank Mir Cain Velasquez (C)7 - 0 W- UFC 121 vs Brock Lesnar" +": '…not every health issue is a health care issue' writes Steve Chapman in Health Care and Infant Mortality: The Real Story. 'Like life expectancy (the subject of a previous column), infant mortality is a function of many factors. The more you look at the problem, the less it seems to be correctable by a big new federal role in medical insurance — and, in fact, the less it seems to be mainly a medical issue at all. 'Comparing white Americans to Norwegians in his 1995 book, ""The Tyranny of Numbers,"" [ Nicholas Eberstadt, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington concluded that ""white America's higher rates of infant mortality are explained not by poverty (as conventionally construed) or by medical care but rather by the habits, actions and indeed lifestyles of a critical portion of its parents."" Whites are not unique in those types of behavior. 'African-American babies are far more likely to die than white ones, which is often taken as evidence that poverty and lack of health insurance are to blame. That's entirely plausible until you notice another racial/ethnic gap: Hispanics of Mexican or Central or South American ancestry not only do consistently better than blacks on infant mortality, they do better than whites. Social disadvantage doesn't explain very much. Nor does access to prenatal care, as the health care critique implies. It used to be assumed that if you assured that pregnant low-income women could see a physician, their infants would do much better. Not necessarily.' " +This page should really be used to discuss the article in the question. For the issue of trust metrics and networks in Wikipedia, see WP:TRUST. +Only being Russian guy. +go on then delete me then you cunts this is communism +" In the article Pink (colour), they altered the sentence to say: Crying (also known as sobbing, wailing, weeping, bawling, or blubbering) is shedding tears as a response to an emotional state in humans. They changed it from ""also called"" to ""known as"" to call attention to the word. Their personal talk page is covered with references to death' and mentioned in context with colours. They were warned prior to this about WP:UNBROKEN Why did they specifically add Europe to this article and remove Australia? Star Fox: Assault had other vandalism from different editors. Generally, they're making a series of edits which is ""semi-constructive"" trolling. Taking into account the death images and baiting combined with that and their identification of their personal talk page as an article, a warning for ""disruptive editing"" was the most apt warning I could find. " +Good idea, poor more gas on the fire. I too the high road and asked for an RfC on Talk:Fuel TV. How does reporting me solve anything? +Barry, Marc and Penenberg, Adam L. Spooked: Espionage in Corporate America. Perseus Books Group, December 5, 2000. ISBN 0738202711 +That reply you sent me made me very sad. I said clearly that i don't want to start any wikihate. But surely, don't you realise that President Bush is not an alien? He is a 61 year old man, and deserves dignity. You are arrogant, alking and using words like 'dude' that doesn't contribute as a respectable part of the English language! Chill, man! You are really horrid, and have made me angry. +" Cleanup ""During Pearl Jam's concert at the Orange Stage in 2000, a violent accident occurred. Nine people died in front of the stage. The exact conditions as to how they died have been examined by both the police and the public prosecutor and at subsequent civil trials - the conclusion of these determines that it was an accident. Many people fell down, which often happens at big concerts, but at one place they did not get up again. Some crowdsurfers fell into this ""hole"" and are believed to have been factors of the event turning wrong (crowdsurfing was subsequently forbidden across most of Europe). The people at the bottom died of suffocation. When the security guards in front of the stage got to the area after the music had been stopped it was too late. In the following year, the accident led to massive changes with regards to safety to avoid similar situations - not just at Roskilde Festival, the security conditions for festivals everywhere in Europe changed. Before the accident in 2000, Roskilde Festival was considered one of the safest festivals, and yet the accident happened there. Many other festivals have smaller safety systems than Roskilde Festival and revised their procedures even further. For instance, Glastonbury Festival in England chose to cancel its festival in 2001 to have enough time to reorganize the safety planning since the festival in 2000 was not at all at level with Roskilde Festival. Each year Roskilde Festival makes an extensive health and safety assessment which the festival is executed on the basis of. The accident at the Orange Stage led to the construction of a memorial grove with a stone with the inscription ""How fragile we are"" surrounded by nine trees."" Seriously, this bit needs cleanup. flash; " +If persistence of vision is a myth in regards to our perception of motion, why does the rest of the article go on to refer to film, video, and animation? If the theory is not applicable, shouldn't these sections be stricken from the article entirely? Persistence of vision doesn't really apply to these areas at all. 209.6.170.107 +Vattel- Any Idea? I thought that Emer de Vattel inspired US. about non interventionism as he is the pioneer of it. Here, he is credited as the root of non interventionism idea. You know, founding fathers are inspired by mainly Law of Nations, Vattel's masterpiece. +Love bombing You have emotional problems, get psyched +even though he admits borders are not established yet, he can easily put countries in asia, but cant in europe. it means he determined the borders himself according to whatever i said before.. OMIT those countries completely. dont make articles at all. who cares, its just sad that people like him are on this website and I also believe that I and not him will be BANNED for these comments because I am LESS than him and he is the BEST editor on earth with many awards and whats the most important is that he is EUROPEAN and the rest of US are not. !!! +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to My ass is on fire. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. +742 Evergreen Terrace - Snake's house? 742 Evergreen Terrace is depicted as Snake's house in this episode - and next door, where Ned Flanders is supposed to be, was Rev. Lovejoy. What's up with that? 67.187.111.107 +Hi Why did you delete my page called Tryhards Fc, as it is an important club in the gaming industry. +" excessively long / appositive commaS This article is excessively long. It has far too much material about Gregory's father Thomas, who is of course the subject of a separate major article. The writer of this article also makes the repeated grammatical mistake of omitting the necessary second comma in appositive phrases such as ""his father, Thomas was a powerful man"". " +" Speedy deletion of HAMKUND SAHIB A tag has been placed on HAMKUND SAHIB, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. User:Veesicle " +Hello Basket of Puppies. I have gone ahead and speedy deleted this template, since you seem to agree and understand that it wasn't such a good idea. As SoWhy said above, you shouldn't feel bad. Mistakes are made by everyone; you have learned from this and so all is well in the world. WP:BOLD is an important policy—and so what you did was fine. Sometimes, though, it doesn't hurt to get some feedback before doing things. If you would ever like some advice or just an opinion, feel free to ask! Most editors and administrators—including me—will be happy to help in any way we can. ÷seresin +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. talk " +mind yo damn buisness +I know Bulgarians hate Serbs...but as You can see, Serbs made 25 % of whole force, and all heavy cannons. So You people from Bulgaria cant say its just Bulgarian victory. Excuse me, but you are not objective. 92.37.30.81 +The word Nair is said to be originated from Naya(Dog),implying that they were loyal to their Brahmin and kshtryia masters.Even today they give undue respect to those community members unlike the rest of malayalees.Though there are a few cases of Nairs becoming Naduvzhi's can be compared to a watcher or a peon becoming a manager of a company.Kerala's kshtriya and Brahmin community were so small that they needed help to look after their land and other assets.So some of the watchers became small time rulers.Therefore this cannot be applied to a whole society.Earlier dutch visitors to kerala has protrayed Nairs a group of mercineries doing anything for money while they were proud to have their females sleeping with the upper caste men! Anil kumar +Hi . Sorry, I was away for a few days. It looks like took care of this though. The page was moved into the Wikipedia namespace rather than the article namespace (Wikipedia:Richmond Nature Park rather than Richmond Nature Park, where it is now) and still had the sandbox template. Looks like everything is sorted now? +"08:56, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) Moved text I think the below text confuses the ""adventure"" section, so I've moved it here: " +You started a great page on vaccine controversy. There are too many people making it an advertisement for pharmaceutical companies. WP:RSN MIller's article is under fire. +" March 2006 (UTC) Comment to anyone reading The above distinction is now moot, since it was decided to remove automatic Olympic medal categorization via Template:MedalGold, Template:MedalSilver, and Template:MedalBronze, due to undesirable lack of sort key in those additions. So now all 3 pairs of ""Medal"" templates are equivalent all they do is format the row of the medal table, and nothing else. So it goes. Of course, who knows what the Olympic Wiki project people may think up to do retroactively to any page that uses Template:MedalGold etc., so it's still safest to use Template:MedalGoldGeneric for non-Olympic medal tables. talk 21:51, 31" +" copyvio It would be helpful if the offending passages were listed. The page this article's Copyvio link points to and the article don't appear to have much text in common. Talk " +First Country Band Saying that Texas Lightning is the first country band to participate in ESC is slightly misleading, as Bobbejaan Schoepen perfromed country music in Flemis at ESC 1957. I admit that he's not a band, but I still think it could be phrased better. +" A kitten for you! hey buddy heres a kitten just for u =D " +I don`t even see why he had to post all that crap, i have mailed the oversight people and asked them to remove it as a BLP violation. I will not have my name even remotley tied to that shit that petri posted +" I am only stating what is already included in the CC, so it can't be more restrictive because it is already part of it. The license says X and instead of leaving it on the license page, I put X on the image page. No additional restrictions, just pointing out my moral rights. Some people have been using my images without attributing me, and as the work spreads around it will be forgotten where the image originated and who holds the copyright. I want to state my moral rights outright to prevent any argument in the future that someone could use my work this or that way because of this or that. Yes, mostly academic and may never need use, but something I would feel more comfortable to have on the image rather than something merely linked to. [tk] " +Thank you for voting. +please do not reinsert +" Article about ""trans-panic"" defense I removed a dead link to what was supposed to be a copy of an article on the trans-panic defense from a law journal. (It might have been a copyright violation anyway; in fact, that may be why it's now a dead link.) Does anybody have a citation (even without a link) to the original article? | Talk " +" (As for Jeppiz, again, your behavior was arguably rude and appalling and dismissive and ignorant (by your own admission) and ""I don't like"" and not acknowledging the quoted WP guideline of ""minority view"" given SOME mention, but just ""not as much"", etc etc. I'm not perfect, and neither are you, if that's the case. And also the ""modify instead of revert"" etc.. And you lied about my ignoring ""Bold, Revert, Discuss"", as that's all I've been doing here, for hours, on this talk page, which you show no respect or appreciation for. So as I said, you're very pot-kettle-black...though I tried to discuss and present and work here with you.) " +" Why do you accuse me of making personal attacks on my own IP# talk page? If you take a look at the bottom of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Samuel you will see that IAN THOMSON makes a person attack on an editor by calling him ""crazy"" and promoting an external defamitory site that was removed but placed back by someone else. Wikipedia should be called Wickedpedia 99.148.192.105 " +" I have made many meaningful contributions to Wikipedia, and have not trolled. Please remember to assume good faith. " +Margolis is a valid source +" ps. While NLP can be applied to many fields, some are sometimes still called NLP, others are not. This does need to be reflected. Coaching (for example) is field in which NLP can be applied and some NLP practitioners who coach simply call what they do ""NLP"". Law enforcement questioning can use NLP but it's not called NLP. " +Hi - any word from Helixweb? I'd like to see Helixweb's stalking reverts on Edamame and two other pages reverted. What are your thoughts? I also really don't want to see his/her messages sitting on my talk page. Can I revert those as well? (Talk) +Done! The sentence does sound better. +Explain why you disagree with my changes? Don't just revert. +Play the man as you may, I'll keep playing the ball. What have I at all been inaccurate about anywhere to any degree?? +, this is becuase very few of his critics have actually read his books +":::Nice work Alison! I suspect he has other ""good hand"" accounts most notably " +" The ""deliberate..."" portion (to the end of the line), none of which is even remotely fair or accurate. ''''''chatspy " +REDIRECT Talk:Dragon's Teeth (Star Trek: Voyager) +Jian Battista Calvi also referred to in the article is Giovanni Battista Calvi. +Nothing says Lesnar is actually on the card yet. Just because Carwin tweeted it does not mean its true. Who really knows how long Lesnar will be sick and how much time he will need to recover and train. +Other new stadium I don't think it would hurt to mention the purpose of the other stadium being built. +" I think the term you boys and girls are looking for is ""most of the international community"" " +Marley & SofíaCarmen & FernandoDiego & GiselaLisa & Juan PabloLuli & AlejandroNicolás & JudithChiche & MarianaWanda & Cristian +. By Rajeshmsharma - Merc, do you know what is sirsasana. The video shown on the page is not correct. Why did you delete correct sirsasana video +" ""Zatoichi the Last"", 2010 Since the Internet Movie Database (imdb) is not acceptable as a reference source here, and I myself can't find anything online to reference the actual release of this film, it's been tagged needing a citation. Perhaps a wiser editor will come round and fill that in, that missing ref. that I do not think is out there. imacowboy " +Let me know when you're done with Xu Xusheng, and I'll nom; thinking something simple like ... that Xu Xusheng discovered the Erlitou culture. +" Redlinks to legislation. Regarding the back-and-forth over whether redlinks to obscure legislation should be listed, has now posted those redlinks in List of United States federal legislation - which is where they should be, not necessarily here. I will contend, however, that almost any piece of legislation enacted by a vote of the Congress and signed into law by the President is encyclopedic, especially in a non-paper venue such as our own. Cheers! T " +Wow Zsero, what strange, other people change these pages and you don't do nothing, only when I change, you have a problem with me??? I think your job are wonderful, blocking people, wow, how many people you did it? Many, it is because that many people come here to complain about you, is not easy being a stupid person like you is. You know? Good work, keep blocking people, I thought that the policy of Wikipedia is to be free, but not with you here. PS: Wikipedia is public, not just yours - remember this, stupid editor ;) 201.14.225.152 +" Project Management weblink Dear MrOllie, I wrote you on the 17th January and unfortunately I haven't received an answer yet. I found my question in your ""Archives 1"". So I put it again, just in case you couldn't see it. I understand, you receive hundred of questions daily. This was my question last time: ""please could you tell me why you delete the link I put with the practical tipps for a efficient Project Management? It is not a promotion, because they are tipps. For me, promotion is all the softwares that are in the ""List of ERP software packages"". Please, could you explain me, why these ERP vendors are allowed to be in Wikipedia if promotion is forbidden? Thank you very much for your time! HumboldtKritiker — Preceding unsigned comment added by HumboldtKritiker (talk • contribs)"" HumboldtKritiker" +" ""The purpose of coindesk is to promote bitcoin"" - is there a source for this claim? " +I wanted to second that. This is not a dispute about relationships. This is a nomenclatural action. These actions are guided by a set of rules and are overseen by the ICZN. There really aren't sides to this discussion. There are a group of people aware of the current state of the nomenclature and a group that are using an outdated name, because they are still unaware. +"If ""Biohazard 2"" redirects to ""Resident Evil 2,"" why does ""Albatross18"" redirect to ""PangYa?"" Unless I'm missing something, this seems like an inconsistency. " +Your knowledge of Hebrew? Thank god that Jossi speaks Hebrew, to back you up. And the Humanist is a treasure for that as well, isn't it. But to have it look scholarly, it is simply to amateurish. +Comments Hey people! Hope you luv my page! ~Anna~ +Romanization Hi. I decided to restart an old, painful discussion about romanization you were involved in three and half years ago. This time I gave real substance to the discussion. I appreciate if you join me: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#No standards, only deliberate differentiation and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#No standards outside Wikipedia, no standards in Wikipedia. +Too bad none of you dude reads the NY Times - all that stuff was discussed in a recent article about him two days ago. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/arts/television/05schimmel.html +Moose== Is it my fault what a moose does? - LD == +" Hi How dare you? try to delete my words. Are you Libra, Gemini or some haters else? The picture on the ""front page"" was so show-off. " +Do you have a source other than your opinion from watching the video clip?? +Perhaps we should do Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts instead, and see how that goes. I don't think any alert for him has been on there in the past. With alert, it takes less time to make, and gets enough input usually. If it fails (or not much response), then RFC is the way to go. +I just want to thank the editors here for a breakthrough moment for me upon reading the article. I've had the same 3am-11ish sleep pattern for the last 23 years, with occasional episodes of N2HSS, and only lately have found a line of work compatible with that pattern. I'm a music composer for tv shows and films, so I work on deadlines. I'm very excited to learn more about this, and get started on a treatment plan, because it would be nice to not have to always schedule meetings in the afternoon. Cheers! +I warned you, man. You now have me pissed off. THE ARTICLE WAS JUST CREATED THE OTHER FUCKING DAY. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE PERFECT, SO SHUT THE FUCK UP. YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT CODE LYOKO FROM WHAT I CAN SEE, SO LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE NOW, OR AN ADMIN WILL BE NOTIFIED. +Ben Gaelys Gay Ben Gaelys Gay +|listas= Ashby, Harry +" Moreover, you claim that ""the ethnic composition of the region has not changed dramatically in the 20th century"", thereby disregarding almost all of the history of CCP-ruled China. Dito: small red fruits, neatly selected. > haneʼ " +" Edit requests Hi May I ask if the IP user (182.6.221.34) adding and removing comments from Talk:List of best-selling albums is in fact you, logged out. The reason I ask is that the IP deleted one of your comments: , and I don't want to revert if it is in fact you.  talk " +"Svetovid, I think it's reasonable to include statements that seem ""ambiguous"" or subjective, if the surrounding text is clear that ""this is what the person/group believes"", and not ""this is substantiated, empirical fact"". Destiny, or karma, is an important concept in anthroposophy and Waldorf education. Whether the reality of karma can be objectively substantiated is not the subject of this article. " +" Speedy deletion of Image:Dignityglug.jpg Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Dignityglug.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. • (contribs) " +I made a legitimate response to a DYN nomination noticeboard post, a nomination that randomly caught my eye after looking at the Narekavank nomination. I never even knew it was Epeefleche who made the nomination until he made his usual stalking allegation to intimidate me away. As far as I know I have had no contact with anything Epeefleche has edited for at least 7 weeks, and this is an editor who edits 1000s of articles. Where is the stalking? +See Bugzilla:17082. '''''' talk +08:28, 10 August 2009 +He's notable alright as being a friggen racist lunatic. Here are a few examples! http://propagandapress.org/2007/02/21/fuck-bubba-by-saab-lofton/ http://propagandapress.org/2007/02/26/man-fuck-florida-talking-shit-about-cuba-saab-lofton/ http://activistsinlasvegas.blogspot.com/2006/12/rules-for-whites-by-saab-lofton.html +Your edits to cotton gin +List of Governors of Puerto Rico I'll do some work on this in the next few days; I think first of all that it could easily be split into two articles, Governor of Puerto Rico, describing the office, and the list, having a list. +Edit For clarification, was this edit done by you? The history shows a couple minutes after that you made 4 edits and I'm just wondering if this edit was done by you logged out or not. +) This is also mentioned in an external link about Toph. What was the exact page on shaolin.com? Was it a forum? Forums are not to be trusted.( +The dangling semi occured in 1997, The driver, an Elyrian Woman, was unhurt but she shit her pants....... +Being sorry is no use. Just don't do it. +17:32, February 10, 2006 Could you be more specific as to what is point of view? +Please note that I put forward four bullet points above. While I believe that mention of Proposition 8 should be accompanied by both explanations in as brief a form as possible, I would agree that it would be equitable, though not optimal, to simply remove any further description of Prop 8 from this article as I mentioned in my fourth point. The current description is not impartial to differing views on the measure. +" Thanks so much for asking, . I know I often come off as a douche, and I've been fixing that, mainly by following your example. So just so i'm glasslike: I really am grateful for how you've treated me since November, in this, my third attempt in 10 years, to withstand our ""battlefield""-hardened Wikipedian culture. War is seductive. i was twice seduced, then repelled, by our ""war"" games. This time, I'm here to stay, thanks to good Wikipedians like you. And i'm changing the way i play the game. Instead of rejoining our Competitive games (which only boys, mainly, love), from now on I'll be playing only Cooperative games, which both girls (and some boys), normally, do enjoy. Now back to praising you: You could have simply done to me what too many other powerful Wikipedians do: with 2 clicks, undo the ~1 wo/man-week of work my friends and I invested into the Cooperation Index and 3d2do designs. Side note: we designed those mechanisms specifically for the inactive Community & Kindness projects that we adopted back in November. Our premise is this: systemic bias and other dysfunctions within the Wikipedia Community are but symptoms of diseases which have rendered our Community moribund for almost a decade. But we did agree that the Gender Gap among Wikipedians is the most shameful of these symptoms, so our first application of the Cooperative design is meant to end - and quickly - the gender bias among Wikipedians. also expressed some major concerns, in a note to me via the Gender Gap list. I've got two unmovable deadlines today in the extra-wiki world (so annoying, that) but I'll be back ASAY to address each of your points, at the Project's Talk page: Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force/3D2Do Thank you both. In Community, i remain, truly yours, Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ " +"Otherwise, please point out the ""personal attack"". " +": You really haven't bothered look at this properly, have you? I was tidying up my talk page. I was not ""throwing foul language at other users"". And you have absolutely no reason to believe ""it's extremely likely you'll do it again if unblocked early"". Can you point to *any* incivilty from me off my own talk page, which is the only one you've left me access to? " +"==About your RV action in otaku page== Before you RV it, haev you notice that what URL I have typed are sources? (otherwise, why shoud l provide the URL?) I have remedied the lost data, except the most controversal one ""Otakuism"" (since many don;t know what I am saying in terms of sociology) =.= 16:20, 1 Sept 2006 (UTC) " +Our gay leader Yamla, Gay niggers of saturn and jupiter are hailing your name and your wide butt the size of the city of paris +You just want to keep it because you are a paedo211.220.23.15 +Link Someone placed a link to the prior article, which has been archived off Wikipedia, and is no longer Wikipedia's responsibility, in the current article. Since this is a hot news story, and the new version of the article is a stub, I see nothing wrong with giving people a link to the old version while the new one is rewritten, so they at least have something to read. Justin is of course welcome to complain to anyone hosting the old article, but as you know, trying such things on the Internet just makes more people replicate the information on their sites, and is a fruitless exercise. If someone can come up with a really good reason why we shouldn't do this, I am willing to listen, but barring that, I will happily use up my two reverts to maintain the link to the old article until the new one contains more than 2 sentences of information. +Do you like to wear adult diapers for fun? I do. +I said one week== I said I would move it in a week, I will move it soon, unless someone else wants to. Sorry for delay all. == +" Sentence in ""Ergot Theory"" I'm not really satisfied with this sentence ""A new study has shown that a primitive form of LSD was infecting the wheat supply on one side of the village. "" First off, what study? There is no reference cited so this could be some wackos study or it could be something reputable. Also, the sources I've cited in the rest of this section were all discussing RYE not wheat. This is the lone sentence about wheat and I have no idea whether ergot (which I assume is what is meant by ""a primitive form of LSD"") on wheat does the same as ergot on rye. I propose the sentence be edited out unless it can be expanded by citing some verifiable study. " +Ms. Marsden is a highly controversial political figure with many enemies. Let's please keep that in mind when people start posting unsubstantiated criminal allegations (made by someone who's under investigation themselves, yet) without even so much as a charge or even an arrest. '''''' +" That was a neat rhetorical sleight of hand, wasn't it? I'm not trying to base the contents of an article on what ""we all know""; I'm calling you out on a disingenuous analogy. If you really think there's no more coverage of fascism or of rape in scholarly sources than there is of donkey punches, I will cheerfully provide you with the titles of fifty published books on each. There's a difference between basing encyclopedia content on what ""we all know"", and using what ""we all know"" to make a point in a conversation. I hope you can see that. What I'm pointing out is that fascism and rape are clearly extremely citeable, whereas donkey punch isn't. With proper sourcing, the donkey punch article will not be deleted, no matter how much people hate it. Unless someone is deleting properly sourced articles based on distaste, your analogy goes nowhere. As for myself, I've argued for deleting articles I like a lot, based on the fact that no verifiable sources could be found for their contents, so don't tell me why I'm ""picking on"" this article. I actually take the position I do because I really like WP:NOR. - " +" Please use the talk page to discuss any changes. You do not own this list and should not arbitrarily change the criteria to suit you. bigissue " +Have you dropped northen rail an email. Any luck?!? We need some pictures facing the airport. +Listen you sick fuck You perverted freakshow loser, nobody wants anything to do with you. Go fuck yourself and leave Wikipedia the fuck alone and spare the world your scum. +U R A DUMB ASS ! 95.114.245.254 +Basically, this editor is just making mountain out of a molehill. +""""""""" Please have only swamiji's photo to avoid deletion oldruff " +" Hey. I believe that the IP user 72.11.138.103 may be Inkheart again. A few hours ago, the anon made four edits only to stuff Inkheart's sockpuppets use to edit, and followed Inkheart's MO of removing template tags. phois Same with anon phois " +Bio Info Bio info is left in the band and song section, making your restrictions selective to my entries. All information published is verifiable from the school, county and the band. Censorship is un-american. +Bandurria https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandurria_(instrumento_musical) +. Even what an editor might think is tiny gets received as major - remember this +" Reply from Ian13 Thank you for your message on my talk page. I have replied to your message and would be grateful if you'd continue the discussion on my talk page. /t " +Vakil Townscape'- You Won’t Feel Like Missing It. The project is approved by ‘BMRDA’. And affiliated with leading banks such as HDFC, Axis Bank and LIC. ‘Townscape’ is ideally located at Bangalores' quiet and green suburbia of Jigani, Near HCL-SEZ, Off Hosur road, Close to Electronic City IT hub- Bangalore. It’s a 25.79 Acres of residential township consisting 356 Independent Villa Plots. With a Plot Area of: 30x40, 30x50, and Odd Dimensioned plots. Vakil Townscape provides you all that basics you need for your serene living at our project Along With Bunch of Civic Amenities Clubhouse Multipurpose Hall Swimming Pool Table Tennis Tennis Court Snooker Reading Room Jogging Track Skating rink Children Play Area Gazebo Garden Floral Landscape Toddlers Corner Basket Ball Court Rose garden Senior Citizens Park +Go fuck yourself, you big fat faggot. I lost my penis in a forklift accident 13 years ago. I always ask people about the length of their penis because I miss the whole deal. I'm absolutely NOT interested in the penis of a pig like you. +Extremely well written new edit! It clears up some of the obscurity in Apollonius Rhodius' poem. +"::: HI. Yes we have to keep moving forward. People (3/4?) are mostly like the Hobbits, the ones who stayed in the Shire. They dont even know they dont know. I think something bigs going to go down this decade. A lot of people are waking up to whats going on and the Elite are running out of cover. They will try something, again. Like they did in Syria. I never thought Id be grateful for the influence of the Brics block esp Russia, but I am due to their effect on a corrupted Western elite who want War. Fortunately the US military is over rated and Russian weaponary esp missiles, all categories, are superior. (not well known). AS for wikipedians, very uncreative platform here constrains them and its open to abuse. But we have to try. Lol talk " +What is the source of the 7500? +The IP's listed on page are registered to Wikipedia. That seems to indicate some error in the autoblocking software. (I assume Smee doesn't work for wikipedia) -} +":ah yeah, i was hoping the literal translation was gonna make sense in english or with the context you would have. i can't really figure what it would be in more typical english, because this sentence in dutch is i think as unspecified as the english sentence i gave, so it would depend on context. i also think the Dutch sentence may be a somewhat inaccurate translation form German or English itself so.. but as the sentence is is supposed to mean that it fails requirement for inclusion in Wikipedia. which i find somewhat odd.. i would guess what they're trying to say is that the article is a stub and requires more contend· Lygophile has spoken " +" شهاب الدین حبیبی خوزانی I don't quite understand your removal of the prod tag. People at The translation desk have examined this article and decided it should be deleted, as is clear from the link on the page. What more do you expect from ""letting the translation process run its course""? (討論) " +Watergate burglaries Regarding your WP:NORN question, if you were personally interested in working on this topic I would recommend starting over fresh, abandoning all the previous work because of its basis in original research. +Five editors have agreed to this content inclusion, only two have opposed. There is a consensus here. +|listas = Disturbing the Peace (band) +Hi Michael Hi Michael! Just a little message to say hello and let you know my handle. +POV ==TAB Do not make baseless accusations of POV pushing in a dispute. ( ) == +Furthermore, if a user openly criticises such content, s/he is tracked by the said contributor and wil have his/her own contributions reverted at every opportunity. +Please read the whole conversation before putting jugement or warnings on to me please! http://lellebylle.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_lellebylle_archive.html your blog]. I have all the time acted in good faith and with openness, and any way been accuesed for the opposit, this is I bleive on more example, taking a citat from its context it looks like I am cheating, but if you look carefully I only tried top help a friend to lears and become Wikipedia contributer in another place then what is discussed here. Therefor it is no meatpuppit or what you call it, I am only trying to be a contributer in Wikipedia, but now I am harrassed and Calton is attacking me and my wirk in ecological economics, ecotheology and swedish version of both. So if I am wrong and he is right I will say good bye and leave Wikipedia. +" You'll field this one?! LMAO, you're kidding me right? Good joke. Anyway, Mr. Uninvolved, even though by you adding your two cents makes you involved, I am not speaking to you so you should not reply. I have reviewed your contributions, and you are attacking an editor also Fritzy. You see how easy it is to make unfounded statement?! You want to get involved in this too, then the same thing I said to your friend whom you replied for, goes to you. ""State a policy which I am breaking and direct me to the quote which proves I am breaking this, if you cannot then you have business in threatening me."" " +" Definitely not. See also |seriously|folks ''' " +" Moved the laundry list to ""Circumcision worldwide"" I figured the list should not be removed per se (someone may well actually want a list like that from wikipedia) but its ugly and bulky and shouldn't be in the main article. So I put it in a separate article, Circumcision worldwide. Couldn't think of a better name for now. Maybe make it an actual list:circumcising countries eventually? " +Oh Fuck you, nigger. +It focuses on WWII and the ADL also. +My understanding is that no, he's not; it's just that that should have been made more clear before he was blocked. - (talk) (contribs) +You don't seem to be understanding that it is simply a minority of internet trolls who used the hate of that disaster as some kind of karmic reference to paid dues for Pearl Harbor. It is not note worthy, and I suggest you take an especially pristine amount of care in re-reading the paragraph I posted in this talk section and fully understand each and every word I carefully chose to state what needed to be stated. 71.94.7.228 +I appreciate all of your responses. I had added this item to WP:BLPN before I saw KDP's pointer to the talk page. My apologies. +The only help I need is the removal of deletionist administrators such as yourself. As you can see from my contributions, I add quite a bit to Wikipedia. I'm glad you see this. +" Yes, interesting. But it would be WP:SYNTH to state that this research had anything to do with Alzheimer's disease at this time. And we neither predict the future, or reach non-published conclusions in this encyclopedia. But thanks for giving us a head's up. Talk• Contributions " +DON'T MERGE GUTTERPUNK! Whatever is decided about 'Streetpunk' and 'OI', none of this is relevant to the 'Gutterpunk'entry. The 'Gutterpunk' article will be expanded and corrected as social science research takes its course. 'Gutter punk'or 'gutterpunk'(it is not yet clear whether or not the space will make a difference) as referred to in the article has nothing whatsoever to do with music or fashion. It is a social science term that is emerging as a demographic differentiator between subgroups of street-dwelling youth. Watch the Journal Of Childhood, Youth and Environment for developments. http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye/ +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""| Hello Triplejumper! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! khoi {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The Community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats [[Wikipedia:C +Footnotes Hello again, IradBG. I've made some changes to this article. You did a very nice job of citing references. However, I'd like to tell you about a Wikipedia tool that makes footnotes easier to manage as an article grows. That tool ( and tags) is fairly easy to use. I've wikified all your footnotes using the and tags. You might want to take a look at the article again to see how this all hangs together. I encourage you to use the and tags in the next article you write. Thank you for your excellent contributions to Wikipedia! +" This is certainly a dishonest view and calls your objectivity into great question. Do you consider the New York Times a fringe source? Adding alternative POV to the article This article's neutrality is questionable. How should we add alternative articles into the text? I propose that we add ""alleged"" to the opening paragraph and include references that show that the facts and details are in dispute. This will allow the reader to see that there is more than one narrative. Since the facts and events are in question the opening should NOT state things as a given. I will add a dispute tag to the article so people can join the talk here.129.59.79.123 " +. State level organizations accredited by the ANCC are experiencing similar problems +My Thoughts You're a jackass. Does this look familiar to you? >Never mind the Chinese/Japanese crap, here are the Doobie Brothers. Eat that up you pussy, and I hope you die +" Feb 5 outbreak I have put mention on the ""In the News"" section but with old death toll numbers, as no source has the 11 death toll (which is based on combining all sources). Once a final death toll comes, I agree it should go to the main page. Importance should increase to Mid at 20 deaths and High at 40 deaths. i dont know why but i felt like i had to say your doing a great job on wikipeda —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.131.164 Yeah, I was going by past convention and the thought that it is all part of the article name. I'll leave it for now but move it back once all calms down to avoid this becoming a war. Look through all the WFO sites, information statements, local storm reports and SPC updates for ratings. Do not add media-listed ratings unless confirmed by WFO's. Certainly no one-stop shop there. I'd wait for the NCDC report to come out, since that provides final updated information and reliable sources. Barnstar The Tireless Contributor Barnstar For the most work I've seen done on an IP, I award 66.51.147.57 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Keep up the good work and don't stop! What you can do The only thing you can do is create an account for yourself. I know you said not to say it, but that is the only way to help yourself. gabsadds " +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  (t, c, e) Your recent edits to MySpace Could you please leave a note on Talk:MySpace about why you think the article is unbalanced, self-contradictory and contains weasel words? I have removed the tags pending a discussion of the issue. Thank you. (t, c, e) " +" I was blocked for this offensive remark, but not for it was written in non-English. I promise that I won""t insult other members, and also I request you to oversite this comment. What about communicating in foreign languages - I wrote, because English isn""t my native language and I write bad enough in English, although I can to read. (But in articles, unlike on talk pages, I wrote in English.) Nevertheless, I'll try to write in English both in articles and on talk pages, although as a whole I take part in English Wikipedia only occasionally. " +" I'm not ""on message"", so I have to be eliminated. Fatuorum " +" Inaccurate ""Monday Night RAW was launched on USA Network in January 1993. The previous WWE program on USA, Prime Time Wrestling (which was edited from syndicated programming), was losing its audience. The WWE decided that it should use its cable time as a showcase for original matches and storylines that would serve as the major build-up to the monthly pay-per-view."" Umm there were no monthly pay per views in 93. Only 4 at the time..." +"Hey LaserBrain: i pity you. You are the kind of soul who gives Protestants a bad name. Regardless of your edits, we Catholics will continue to identify ourselves as ""Catholics,"" NOT ""Roman"" Catholics. You are in my prayers. " +EDIT: Before I forget: We had an agreement, that you changed several times. So, you are in violation of the revert rule. 62.178.177.37 +" Regarding the statement: ""Prize money for Thailand Division 1 League (season 2006) has been missing. Royal Thai Police FC, the winner of the season told the press to sue the FAT."" Is it possible the correct line should be""......Royal Thai Police FC, the winner of the season told the press they would sue the FAT.""? This is important, as it changes the meaning greatly. " +" I respectfully disagree with changing all of the ""Torres"" references to O'Malley. This has been discussed on the Grey's Anatomy and List of characters from Grey's Anatomy talk pages, although it hasn't been an issue on this article before. Several characters have casually referred to the couple as ""The O'Malleys"" and Callie as ""Callie O'Malley"", but professionally and probably legally (despite the soundtrack of the most recent episode""My Favorite Mistake"") she is still Callie Torres. Her medical license would be in the ""Torres"" name, so until and unless she went through the arduous and long process of changing it, she would have to practice medicine as Callie Torres. There is certainly precedent for female surgeons retaining their ""maiden"" names upon marriageMiranda Bailey's husband is a Jones, and even Addison hyphenated her last name prior to her divorce. In addition, Callie's labcoat in ""My Favorite Mistake"" still reads ""Callie Torres M.D.""when Addison's character name changed to Addison Montgomery, she also got a new labcoat. Callie seems to still be using Torres, aside from the casual ""Callie O'Malley"" nicknaming. " +" I have tweaked my request to be more clear on that point. interestingly I was composing a note to you which got with your message above. in the aNi, you discussed 1938 and said that was prior to the holocaust. I do not believe that is the (universally) accepted definition. The holocaust often taken to be more than just the ""final solution"" our own article on the topic goes significantly into nuremberg laws and other repressions happening in the '33-'35 range. In this sense, I was using Holocaust to mean ""the whole of negative actions taken by the nazi's against the jews"" and not referring specifically to gassing/cremation/etc. (Would this be helpful to clarify in my unblock?) " +The two move discussion attempts Talk:Abortion-rights movement#Requested move, again (to Pro-choice) and Talk:Pro-life movement#Move? (to Anti-abortion movement) both became long and argumentative and inconclusive, and any future similar move discussion attempt would likely end the same. +" sincere reply to Ninlil Dear Ninhil, I thank you very much for intervening... at least this much is accepted by a neutral arbitrator that in case two authors differ in their versions, both versions must be allowed to be retained. Since you wanted specific instances, in the book named Ancient India (1956) by K.A.N.Sastri, he has stated clearly while describing Rajendra Chola I that among the list of conquests (at one point he stated clearly thus:) 'next was the turn Satyasraya who was defeated and banished out of his capital'. This can be contrasted with the statement in this Article that Satyasraya was able to control Chola aggression basing his contention on material from author Suryanath Kamath, without commenting on the accuracy of Suryanath Kamath's version, I accept your verdict that both versions should be allowed to be retained. Dinesh is also erring badly when he writes subsequently in this article about Jayasimha also fighting hard with the Cholas (in fact Rajendra Chola ruled during the time of Satyasraya as well as Jayasimha and has claimed to defeat both) and also goes on to add that both sides lost and won but both K.A.N.Sastri and Rajendra's inscriptions at the Tanjore temple (courtesy the summary of Prof. Huntzsch, noted epigraphist appointed by the Archaelogical Survey of India, a body of the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, whose finds are given in detail at inscriptions.whatsindia.com/ - a site despised unnecessarily by Dinesh Kannambadi as a POV site because its findings go against 'historical events and their conclusions' of his liking) state that he emulated his father in winning the 'seven and a half lakshas of Rattapadi' and where Prof. Huntzsch has clearly arrived at the conclusion (after reading Chola inscriptions from the times of Raja Raja Chola because it was from his time onwards that there were several wars between the Cholas and Chalukyas) that winning seven and a half lakshas of Rattapadi meant winning the war and levying tribute on the losing Chalukya king. Satyasraya lost twice, once to Raja Raja Chola when the Chola army was led by his son Rajendra and once to Rajendra, who also went on to defeat Satyasraya's successor Jayasimha II and Prof. Huntzsch once again attests the expression by Rajendra Chola I in the inscription at the Tanjore temple, a World Heritage site ': ""the seven and a half lakshas of Iratta-padi, (which was) strong by nature, (through the conquest of which) immeasurable fame arose,[7] (and which he took from) Jayasimha, who, out of fear (and) full of vengeance, turned his back at Muyangi and hid himself"", as the Chola once again winning the war (this time it was over Vengi with the Chola army first routing the Chalukyas near Rajahmundry and subsequently at Masangi (called Muyangi in the Chola inscriptions in Tamil langauge), causing their king Jayasimha to banish and then levying tribute on the defeated Chalukya.' These have been attested by both K.A.N.Sastri and R.C.Roychowdhuri in their two books of the same name i.e. Ancient India. To repeat the above, the author R.C.Roychowdhuri in his book Ancient India borrows heavily by quoting extensively from K.A.N.Sastri - this unfortunately, goes against the thinking of user Kannambadi who is repeating blindly that I have no sources - I can assure you certainly I can read and write. It is very poor in taste, the expression of Dinesh Kannambadi who has gone on to justify my previous blocking, as is evident on my talk page dear Ninhil, this was done by user Blinguen an admin probably, who barged into my talk page and blocked me without giving any reason the second time i.e. he violated two rules of Wikipedia which are being advocated by Dinesh Kannambadi and another clique at work in wikipedia, first they ask people like us, who draw from sources and post at times historical events which are not palatable to them, that we should first post on the discussion page, but in my case I was straight away blocked on the first occasion by user Blinguen who certainly did not discuss with me on the article discussion page nor did he discuss the topic itself with me. The second time Blinguen entered my talk page, left a comment that he did not like what I wrote for he thought what I wrote was a personal commentary (when in actuality, it was a summary of Chola historty from which I drew from Prof. Huntzsch's summary from inscriptions.whatsindia.com/ but had made the mistake (I am not shy of admitting I make mistakes) of not posting the source, but before I realized and re-entered the Chola page, I found first that I was not able to edit and found to my horror that Blinguen has arrived at a certain conclusion and blocked me without giving me a chance to explain, discuss or argue with me on the concerned topic and its contents, just as Dinesh Kannambadi is trying to do now by painting anyone whose findings he doesn't like, in black. Mr.Kann +2394r84u438888888888888888888888888888888888888888888gh GET money till the death of mwe yall undersysnf me? +What prejudices? I was making an example of his prejudice by making him face one himself. Or you didn't get it? How did you become an administrator on Wikipedia if you're unable to grasp such simple meanings even? +For how long exactly? 82.40.14.172 +" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ +" Ok, now I really don't understand you. You've gone and tagged Image:Damnation Crusade1.jpg for deletion. Why? It's from the very damn website that sells the comic! If they didn't want the picture to be used as a representation of the series, then they wouldn't of used it as a representation of the series themselves! It's bloody well low resolution, too! What more do you want, Editor-Fag? Obviously, I can't argue with compulsive editor-fags like you. Fine, delete it, and the Image:Forge of War1.jpg one. I'm just trying to add images to help the community on wikipedia to improve the articles that call for pictures. I see it that it does comply to all of the image policies, except perhaps that one ""resolution"" rule, but, then again, if you've got a problem with it, then you can easily solve it yourself. I'm not going to be forced to do the work of an editor-fag like yourself." +" You can also contact me if you wish by clicking ""talk"" to the right of my name. " +Thank you, the dedicatee will be pleased as well, did you know? +" Organization Issue Vis a Vis ""Origins"" Section There is an organizational problem here. Right up near the front is a section entitled ""Origins according to the LDS Church"", but immediately following this section is no corresponding section entitled ""Origins according to Historians"" or ""Other Origin Accounts"" or some such title where critical views of the Church's account can be placed. Indeed, critical views of the origins story are relegated deep within the article as a single sentence, while the Church's story is accorded several paragraphs. I suggest condensing the ""Origins"" section and renaming it. The section should contain a single paragraph (no more than three or four sentences) describing the Church's origin story. Then there should be a second section of equal length (or so) detailing the principal critical views against the Church's origin story. As it stands, there is only the Church-sponsored view of the Book's origin and no others. ( )" +I couldn't find any online material, and I don't have anything in print either. Yet I believe the statement to be true. The ideal source would be And perhaps also The problem we have here is that the original article was written by Colebatch himself, and is dreadfully biased in his favour, yes the only person with an interest in redressing that imbalance is someone with an axe to grind, who is more interested in cutting Colebatch down than actually improving the article. This is not the way to go about writing an encyclopedia. Hesperian +Comparison of Tropical Temp Trends with model predictions This article conflicts with this published paper. +Gastrich's site(s) are neither reliable nor notable enough to serve as sources at Wikipedia. Gastrich's history of self-promotion preclude that. +" Fair use rationale for Image:Iczel02.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iczel02.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 0001 " +-Helllooooooo, anybody out there!?! Or you care to talk to me only after I change the softpedia page, lol. Where are you SarekOfVulcan? You are late, I am not blocked anymore so why you don't talk to me? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to General Medical Council. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hurricane Isaac Hell Grahambrunk, I was looking through some articles such as the Palm Beach Mall (reading it because of the recent demolition) and noticed that you live in the West Palm Beach area of Florida, just like I do ) . Anyway, I am a member of WikiProject Tropical cyclones and created an article called Effects of Hurricane Isaac (2012) in Florida, which is a separate article specifically about impact from Hurricane Isaac in that sate. I was wondering if you had images from that storm (like standing water/flooding) and would consider uploading them to that page. Regrettably I didn't take too many pictures myself, and I asked WPTV and the Palm Beach Post for various images from their collection like a week ago, but I haven't gotten a response. Thanks if you can offer me help regarding this matter, +"|decline=This does not explain why you are systematically undoing the edits of one particular editor over a number of unrelated pages. " +" Blackstar (David Bowie) I am not trying to be disruptive and I would appreciate it if you was assume good faith. Now that said, I have no doubt that this album will become worthy of an article, but it isn't ready yet. WP:NALBUMS states that ""Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article"". There clearly isn't enough of that yet. So I believe until that time, a redirect is appropriate. 46.254.186.36 " +There is more to it than that. The Finn-Ugric and the Ural-Altaic races were related (this is currently being debated with the hypothesis that the Finn-Ugric are a branch of the Altaic languages). The Finn (Sami) have been around 6000-8000BC and possible of common stock to the proto-Magyars. Evidence that the Magyar Diaspora extended from the Chinese Hun (as opposed to the Han Chinese culture), to Scythia (Szekely), Mesopotamia (Sumer) has been around for more than a century and is still hotly debated. Zoroastrian (Parsi) fire temple worship origins in time are still not known and can extend from 6000BCE to 1100 AD. +are we finished yet If we were doing this the proper way: First stepwill take a few days, as it isnt on lineis to read the article mentioned and see what it actually says, because to some of us it seems a very strange assertion Second stepwill take a good deal longer to see if anyone has specifically contradicted him or criticized him. And could someone say exactly how both the impressed letters and the stylus touchups could have been reproduced in the relevant period? This is really OR; I'm going to at least read the article, since I'm curious. Can someone please tell me what a printing press would be if it were not a machine? The general article is printing. the printing press article talks about printing presses. block printing talks about block printing. movable type has to go somewhere, it was voted not to have an art of its own before I got here, so it goes here unless someone has a better place that doesn't contradict the RfD. And the phaistos disc article talks about the disc. As evertype says, there are lots of interesting but unlikely theories about it there. Would someone please like to write something more where we need it, instead of this. Start here, we need material on the 17th 18th and 19th centuryit doesnt take deep scholarship , just enough to summarize. There are plenty of easily available sources. This isnt the page to argue about east asian printing presses. GPM, I know it isnt required, but some of us have posted some information about ourselves on our user pages. +FreplySpang 13:03, 12 September +You don't scare me Chris. Face it, I'm evil, and you are nothing but trash and that is what you will be for the rest of your life! Infonerd2216 +I warnned you not to fuck with me Tony, and now looks whap happened! This would have been a fuck of a lot easier on youe if you would have just let me comme back motherfucker Now you can join me as personae non gratae around here +" Block lengthened I have lengthened your block per your talk page abuse. WHAT?! You have clearly overstepped your boundaries, I am purely following procedure in appealing a block. Your edit summary was ""Rape off Konstable/Steel"" common. I do not see a problem with that vocabulary or phrasing, that is merely a negative perceiving of semantics from yourself. It articulated my thoughts upon the matter to perfection. " +" An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 11 November, 2006. References This article is based on a translation of the equivalent article of the French Wikipedia on 7 November 2006" +" Circle Of Fireballs I removed the A7 tag because, as a fictional character, COF doesn't technically meet that criterion. However, I have nominated it for AfD instead, as it appears non-notable. (t • c) " +Yeah, you're right as well. It's the best pain-in-the-ass thing for the music articles. Thanks for responding by the way. +Sorry I'm just getting back to you. Sure, I'd like to see how it works )... +Wikimeet: enkele verzoekjes http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AOntmoeten&diff;=5857011&oldid;=5856958 Extremely sexy +Personnal attacks Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Talk Wikipedia's de facto policy on personal attacks is that one may make them if one is an administrator (or administrator's pet) and goes about it snarkily. +Just because an article mentions (and cites) that the subject is controversial, does NOT mean it should be deleted. As a matter of fact, most wikipedia articles do mention anything controversial about the article. It is people who delete these sections that have a bias and an opinion, such as yourself....as if you don't want people to know that there is a controversy. That is against wikipedia's neutrality policy. +" N5) Absolutely NPOV about dialect. Avoids edit wars over BrEng and AmEng.  TALK 00:17, 5 October" +This articl has now been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Zaik. +"::::I read the page, PMK1, and it is indeed very interesting, but the only thing that I did not manage to find is any kind of indication of an anti-""Aegean Macedonian"" governmental policy. The change of toponyms-discriminatory policy connection made by you is at least far-fetched. And something else: I do not like to retort to ironies, but PMK1, I kindly ask you not to put into my mouth things I never said. Fairness and democracy were never an argument of mine. So, please, stick to what I actually wrote. I am the last to deny the oppressiveness of the Metaxas regime, but this oppressiveness targeted not the minorities, in particular, but a large part of the population in general. My opinion on the article is already known: I believe it should be incorporated into the Greek Slavophones or merged under a new article, titled per Fut. My opinion on the section in question as long as the article exists is also clear: Accuse the Greeks of what they actually did; not on what you would like them to have done. " +Stop or you will be reported +" Goethean can bite me Make no mistake, I have ABSOLUTELY no respect for your beliefs and methods of intellectual thuggery, bullying... You're a little man, pathetic and cowardly - intellectual, spiritual, and morally corrupt...your shameful ways of gaming Wikirulez, and other equally low games, in order to foist your rotten and flawed points of view, is reflective of your ethics I have seen on wikipeidia for years now. Your rotten behavior is a refection or fruit of your beliefs and upbringing and education. Lastly, what is sad is no one calls you to task, with out getting wracked by your admin friends (the nineteen old ""paul blart"" rent a goon, Tiptoey). Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor. Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.??? Any rate I be waiting for you there. JoE " +Michael Crook You keep reverting the listing for this person under Rome, New York. This subject has a pending page, and is well known for his anti-military projects. He meets the criteria for notable persons, in that he's gotten much media attention, most recently for claiming a rape victim who committed suicide wanted it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Crook He's been cited in Details Magazine, Syracuse Post-Standard, Fox News Channel, Wired Magazine..and many more. +Template parameters Defiantly date= is the way to go. The templates can be made temporarily to support both, and I have a technique for seguing from one to the other. Historically there was a mish-mash and even I, at that time, working with them on a daily basis, couldn't always remember which was which. Also SmackBot a can add date= if I set it up properly. (It used to add or remove as appropriate - well I think there are still a few cases where it removes.) Farmbrough, 13:43 1 June 2007 (GMT). P.S. I work by evolution, run the Bot and see what's not been fixed, sharpen up the reg-exes, and repeat (with the occaisional re-factor), so I will catch most things in time. Farmbrough, 13:43 1 June 2007 (GMT). +Attempt Your attempt to improve the Galileo article itself needs improvement. +IRC Hey Kim. I am not sure whether this was for me or for Cyde. Since I figure that Cyde is on IRC most of the time anyway, I took a liberty to assume that this was for me. Forgive me if I am mistaken. Thanks for your invitation, but I do not go to IRC except to inquire what's wrong when there is a Server problem. You may check here if interested to know why. BTW, please consider archiving this page. I have an ultra-fast internet and still it took me a long time to load it. +" The article claims that the town's name is spelled Şarkil in ""Turkic"". What is ""Turkic""? If it is Turkish or Tatar, these languages have no relation to the inhabitants of Sarkel. Better spell in Old Russian. Furthermore, Vernadsky asserts that the name is Ugric (Magyar?). -трёп- " +"39, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Deleted speculation reference in the wings ""This raises concerns over the connection between rapid global temperature changes and the possibility of population extinction."" I'm waiting for V. to format the reference from this source: Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 7487-7490, August 1994 Population Biology Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles (eticon/population demography/rate of evolutin/sex ratio/turtles)FREDRIC J. JANZEN* Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 Communicated by Gordon H. Orians, April 29, 1994 (received for review January 3, 1994) []. I suggest the connection between the concern over global warming and extinction be returned to article based on this passage: The causal influence of annual variation in climatic temperature on cohort sex ratios in this population of painted turtles serves as a clear empirical example of the biological impact portended by rapid global temperature change. This study demonstrates that the demography of populations of species with temperature-dependent sex determination may be directly sensitive even to modest deviations in the local thermal environment. These results are entirely consistent with earlier work on a nesting beach of endangered loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), wherein 87-99% of hatchlings from the rookery in each of 3 years were females because sand temperatures at nest level were high (39). If such strongly female-biased cohorts lead to highly skewed adult sex ratios, then the probability of population extinction may be greatly enhanced. It has been referenced and the ""speculation"" was restored. (talk contribs count email) 15:" +" A Personal Attack About Me Please see this . Since you are an admin, I believe you can make this stuff stop. '''''' What did I do this time? " +As soon as you find any reliable sources which say that a crack has been created, you are more than welcome to add it in. +I've significantly expanded and reworked the article with the sources. Can you give any suggestions how to meld things better? The only thing I'd ask is before removing a reference please ask why I added it. I've spent over eight hours trying to be comprehensive and juggling and such so would really not want to have to redo that or spurn your work tr. I think there's still a long way to go but I need another pair of eyes. The Rough Boundaries of the District Run from B street at the Union Depot and runs to 1st street. The union distric6t is described as a economic center for Pueblo. The reason the Obama visit is included because not only does it and other visits to that paticular area help denote it's notability but it is a major political area too. In 1995 we approved a bond of some million dollars to recover from a recession. I need to be descriptive but I don't want it to be a Circle jerk either, basically a counter-wait to my own small Conflict of Interest since I live here. Maybe not a major reformat since I can easily afdd a lot of more sources, Just a few pointers to look at. I hope the lack of sleep made this understandable and if not I hope you get my drift. I'm going to bed I'll have to continue tomorrow. +April 2007 (UTC) Well I'm glad you don't take yourself too seriously, you pendantic twat. 00:37, 23 +" NEsa will work for Beard being an Eagle. I have official BSA hardcopy printouts of DESA and he is not listed there, so he is not a DESA. — • Talk • " +-Thank you, gentlemen! +02:14:24, 3 June 2015 review of submission by Pt.dkpant I've only endeavoured to put fact for the benefit of people.Many persons who come to me even after go for Kaalserpa solutions. The fact can well be verified from Sri KN Rao.I would have not endeavoured if Ref. of Sri Rao is not known to me for who knows me but Sri Rao is without a doubt an autority +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted. {{Quote box | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ''' on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! Nixón Speedy deletion of ""Ardeshir Faghri"" A page you created, Ardeshir Faghri, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. Nixón " +" Well I aint gonna go a fair process anyways just like what they did here apparently is a big power tripper bullying smaller contributors here for his own agenda by calling me a puppet of someone I do not know despite the block being only a possilikely and was never confirmed that I was. Apparently the user does not seem to know the word consensus either as seen in the recent talk page dicussion wherein there were no true final agreement between him and other users such as HTD and carries out things already at his will. See how he bullied his way into kicking me and other users out of a civilized talk about MRT-2? I just hope that he would not victimize more users here as maybe he might be really this Jerome guy wherein Jerome is his fall guy for opposing users. I do hope I could open a SPI investigation with him, HTD, and this Jerome guy as maybe they are the true socks. Just when I thought the Government is the dirtiest place there could be, Riohondo the user proved me there is so much more. Anyways delete my images on commons if you want to just never rename them to ""LRT-2"" or change something to that incorrect name. To the big bully, I hope you could still sleep with your conscience clean every night with what your are doing to others. Please never run for public office we dont need more bullies like you there. '''''' " +" Well, I see things are now finally moving in a more productive direction. Hopefully no one will be ""stung"" too badly by this little dispute. ;-) " +MOney When Oi troied on the demo version of this game, There was a diease minigame in the scenario, WHen Oi found the cure, Oi recived cash, so it's best to do this in the challenges and campaigns. Can Oi please add in this sentence on the diease curing section: When the cure is found, Players will recived game cash. (Best used in Campaign and challenges) +Beg to differ. It is the important thing. Please answer my question. Thanks - (resonate) +Sincere apology So, If I am not mistaken, are you paid by Wikipedia to edit random pages just based on the online sources? the thing is many pages have wrong information. people just make fake websites and put wrong information and people like you copy info from there thinking they are legitimate. +Falling Problem? A word advice chuckels* +Don't bother trying to reason with whomever insists on changing it back. Apparently, he/she has no clue about how the post office works for the 19067 code. +" I think we had better stick with the Tafsir al-Jalalayn version which uses begot and begotten. If Islamic scholars are happy with it - who am I to argue. Anyway it does seem to refute the belief in the Son of God and also that we are created in his likeness. So maybe it is saying ""no! God didn't have a son and you were not created in his image"" which would require the use of begot as given by the Tafsir al-Jalalayn. " +Chump Alright chump, I've grown bored of messing around with your inane contributions, but rest assured that I could keep this up for years if, unlike you, I didn't have better things to do. I don't understand why you want to spend so much time out of your life pretending that you're some sort of Wikipedia patrol officer. Seems to me that pretty much all you do is tag other people's pages for deletion. Seems to me it must be predicated on some sort of megalomania. This whole charade about an encyclopedia that 'anyone can edit' is given the lie by chumps like you. All I wanted to do was write a page about an author I'm interested in, but your arrogant and ignorant deletion of the start of that has put me off bothering with it again. I noticed that when you tagged it for deletion you removed the very clear indication at the top that it was a beginning and that it needed development. This meant that the next person who came along had no idea that there was more to follow. Why didn't you just tag it as a stub? Because you're so wrapped up in your pathetic power trip that you just wanted to alienate me? And who are you to decide who's 'notable' and who isn't? I figure anyone with a dozen published works (which is easily verifiable) is notworthy by any definition of the term except, clearly, the subjective definition you store somewhere in your tiny brain. So congratulations, chump. Enjoy policing this web site. Where would the world be without heroes like you? +Heliac I'm unable to do anything as the IP is completely blocked. Halp? Another person blocked here.. Halp us? +Unfortunately, all it takes is one person who says they are someone to force this type of reliance on secondary sources. ( Looking back at my note, it came off *way* harsher than I intended. I apologize. +Photo size Noticed that you changed the phot size back to default (on the B-17 survivors article) - when the coding is set to the default mode, often the caption get wrapped I found at 200px is usually enough for the the captions to remain stationay under the picture +Yeah well your just a dick +"::Hi Crock, I was just teasin' ya. I did see that you were a regular over at that article, so sorry I yanked your chain before looking. I disagree about the definition of a ""self-published"" source,as I think it goes to the content itself, but I did find and link to the original source. " +The connection being potential is what makes it speculation, even if a few sources are talking about it. As we are an encyclopedia, not a newspaper or blog, we can't include that. - 2¢ © Join WER +I figured you would respond as such. i don't believe it is plagiarism since I attributed the source and provided a link to it. I did not claim that the words were my own (which is the definition of plagiarism). But whatever. +Translation I wonder what the long text on your user page means ? +":There are no procedural listings. We have 3 simple and easy to use templates, depending on the desired action. Anybody bringing WP:POINT nominations, such as Keep, is speedily closed as ""Withdrawn"". " +so they no longer features my original text. +" """"In the midst of my creative journey composing The Fame Monster, there came an exciting revelation that this was in fact my sophomore album. I would not add, nor take away any songs from this EP; it is a complete conceptual and musical body of work that can stand on its own two feet. It doesn't need The Fame. The end. I have proven it. Now, get over it. " +Name As with other well known celebrities, Mr. Marlinspike’s “real name” and birth date (and other biographical information) should be listed. Simply because he is a “security researcher” – a polite term for “hacker” – does not mean he has a special opt-out for accurate Wikipedia data. 132.3.65.68 +Appeal to Arbitration possibility To Guy, I do not like you blocking me in violation of my legal free speech rights, notwithstanding Wikipedia policy to the contrary. I may therefor appeal to Arbitration Committee for review of your judgment. Beyond that I don't know, I'll just check all my other options. I'm usually forgiving, but at this point I don't see how I can do so eaisily for the wrong you did to me. +" I don't know much about WP's Sock Policy but I am so sure about the principle ""Content not Contributor"". The above is a very useful document to understand the recent history of Cyprus and of the essence of the Cyprus question. So it should not be deleted for any reason whatsoever and continue to stay in these pages, just as it is... " +" Particularly as I have been quite vocal about unilateral Jimboisms in the past. I know you are trying to help, but I really think you should maybe give this 3 days, see if you still feel it's a bad call, and then seek input. ~ Riana ⁂ " +So it's a compilation of two other maps, both unsourced and undated. +Zombieland Ok, thank for sending me that link. +" SPI for ISUPsychlaw Hi! You opened the sockpuppet investigation for ISUPsychlaw at the totally wrong place. You placed the text on the main WP:SPI page instead of opening a sub-page. you should go to WP:SPI and follow the instructions in the box titled ""How to open an investigation"". Thanks! (talk) " +yes there is connection to this glorified manga. not only in the name but also in the theme of that episode. 72.185.61.209 +" Powers and Abilities My addition to the Hulk page was removed by a chap named Cameron Scott, but so far he has failed to explain exactly why he did so. My addition to the P+A section simply stated that Hulk's one ""vulnerability"" is that he can be made weaker when calmed down. This has happened in various comics and so is accurate information. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) It's been removed for a few reasons. One, you're violating WP:SOCK, using multiple accounts to try to make it looks like there's more support for your edit than there is. Two, Using one instance of an idea, citing a comic book for it, is not enough. Hulk has been stopped in other ways - Magic, Drugs, being knocked out cold. That his opponents have used the tactic of defusing his anger to allow other methods of defeat to work is also different than that alone being the defeat itself. " +" Comments on the block It is a complaint and I have the rightly described the nature of edits being done by these two editors.Blocking me gives a wrong signal to them and probably will encourage such concerted POV pushing. I have already mentioned somewhere that the organisations supported by these editors have been mentioned as having fascist tendencies by world media.They cant deny that. Some examples against whites from User: Bose. ""There is no shortage of hindu-haters among white scholars, or their pinko moonbat lackeys in India. Surely some hindu-hater like Wendy Doniger, Deepa Mehta or Arundhati Roy has a copy of the film on their website. Find it. Then put it up."" ""The world outside the US is irrelevant"" Read the para ""Human Rights Watch has been criticized as a fraud"" in .See how the edits end.""The world outside the US is less relevant"" My mention of them as US government lawyer and (not Wikipedia's) was their attitude in the article.No comment below is racist in character.This is a false charge and the user who has made that should be blocked.Secondly, they insist on pushing some comments from Daniel Pipes (who is widely known for his Pro-Jewish POV leanings) The complete thread of that discussion is mentioned below Refrain from inserting original research that is irrelevant to the Babri Mosque article. Plus, the section on Pipes you inserted is tantamount to a character assassination of well-respected and US government appointed political scholar Daniel Pipes. Further perpetration of such a deed is grounds for reporting.Netaji Reporting as legal??TerryJ-Ho Is Wikipedia a US government property and you their lawyer? I have taken cue from you .In fact, I have been everyone as Anti-Hindu.TerryJ-Ho In this comment I have not named anyone as Hindu Taliban such inference is just an imagination.I have only given a general example. " +Sally Nicholls Regarding this edit—since when is this restricted to people in official membership? I'll admit here and now to knowing Sally (through YFGM), and I think it's ludicrous to only list people here if they are in membership. Is this meant to suggest that attenders can't be considered Quakers? Sally served, IIRC, as representative from her old Monthly Meeting to YFGM, and was also a volunteer at the 2005 World Gathering of Young Friends. This interview also has her stating that she's a quaker. +I've made most of the changes you suggested to improve the prose and the flow of the article. The second paragraph of the history section is now focused on the effects of the new station after its opening; I moved the park and ride and signage info to facilities and took out the death, as it is somewhat newsy. I also made some changes to the lead, and I rewrote the section on the bus routes, as I realized that listing the exact routes of six bus routes was probably trivial. The one thing I didn't change yet was the 2nd paragraph of the Facilites section, as I'm trying to decide on the best place to put the location info. For this article and my other CTA-related GA nom (Pulaski (CTA Orange Line), I tried to put that info where it seemed to be in the other train station GAs, which are remarkably inconsistent as to this (and as to formatting in general, for that matter). I initially used the format in Storo (station), which lists location info under facilities. Other formats I've seen make location info its own paragraph (Jordanhill railway station), combine all service, facilities, and location info (Sturtevant (Amtrak station), or don't even include location info (Embankment tube station). I'm thinking of making location a new section, though I'm not sure where exactly in the article it should go; otherwise, it should probably stay where it is. Any thoughts? Reaction•Creation +sexual orientation mindset lol. Go die now. Thanks The world. +Periodic Table w/ colors WIP is at Talk:Reactivity series/wip +First the bad news: insisting gets you nowhere around here, and only alienates people. Now the good news: Your material on Bjorn Lomberg has been discussed in top-drawer reliable sources such as The Times. When and if your material on AIT is similarly discussed, it can be considered for inclusion here. But until then, we have to follow WP:SPS. +U r verry angry go and have a cup of tea +Neutrality? This article appears to me to be written by a PR department. I don't really want to put that tag on the article though, as it does seem to be well written and so on. It just seems, ... Well it doesn't have any criticisms for one. A template that might have been better to use might have been this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Primarysources I would start a criticisms section, except I know nothing of the topic, and I don't know the template (and can't find it either) for sections that need attention. ~ Imagine I swore. +Copyright MXMXLI BY ASS_JH GY}} +" Quite a bit to go then, I am unsure when it starts on our tiny island P (talk • contribs) " +The situation is explained in this book. +" Image:Dollyreallove.jpg I have tagged Image:Dollyreallove.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Tex " +Why do you support such vandals as peruvianllama and naconkantari? You use to be cool man. Now you're just GAY. +Can I also mention that if you are going to tag WP:POV, don't tag the entire article because that is completely misleading - put it where it belongs to. +" Your message on my talk page - Hi, you left a message on my talk page about R.Koot deleting references. I'm not sure why you came to me, as I have no knowledge of the subject matter, and don't recall having encountered you before. Sorry I can't help. By the way, I have substed some messages on your talk page which were in template form. What this means is that I've reduced the load on the server, but haven't altered the content in any way, just the coding. Cheers. ♫ " +":::::::::I voluntarily collapsed it and have no problem leaving it there. Talk " +":::There's only two ""citation needed"" tags left now. Once is about the lyrics to songs on Lifes Rich Pageant; I have citations for the sentence, but I wonder if the material is better suited for the album page. The other tag is for the release of Succumbs which is something I don't think we need to cite, but it's up to you. Beyond that, it's pretty much up to me to add more important information as I come upon it in my reading. I will need help with the section covering 2003 and onwards, because my sources don't cover that period; most everything we need for that should be available online, though. Once we're done adding information, I think we need to restructure the History section divisions, and then we can nominate the page for GA. " +Thanks You Chasewc91 & Nightscream makes from good article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella_(music_video)) really SHIT. THANK U FOR THIS!!! FUCK U, BITCHES!!! +What's the point of this link? +Vandalism Do not vandalize the Origin of the Species page again. +Christine Maggiore Is Christine Maggiore really the focus of the interviews, or is it the larger question of alack of consensus among AIDS scientists? Why would the Huffington Post and the Spectator be considered invalid links, but Bay Windows be a legitimate one? The reverts were clearly not done in good faith. +Your lies/deceit You're lying to Chan and trying to deceive him. Why? You have no proof that Jason Gastrich even posts on Wikipedia any more. There isn't even an outstanding accusation from someone that they received a message from Jason telling them to vote. Don't bother Chan or anyone else with your nonsense. You're making Wikipedia a not-so-fun place. +and get to a solution. +Block is clearly punitive not preventative. +Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style News about the site I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Sources for Chris Metzen Hello, good work on Chris Metzen, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Chris Metzen? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! +Thanks for your message, I changed because we are discussing on it, I replied to the person concerned in the talk section but if you revert it again he will not notice the change and not reply. p.s. nice the photo of BA is that Palermo? hasta luego! +Salt in the wounds.... Don't worry, I'll be back again. +No reason to hide images So i unhid it. See Wikipedia:Spoiler for comparison. +Editing Wikipedia simply to quote your organization and get a link to their site on Wikipedia is not appropriate. Please do not edit here for promotional purposes. Thanks. SiobhanHansa +meetup greets Hi there it was nice to meet you (I think?) yesterday at the portland meetup. Hope to see you around again, keep up the good work ! ) ∴ here…♠ +"|decline=This does not convince me that you won't disrupt Wikipedia again. " +An invitation to the Teahouse... Please join us! +User:Nasrallah block? Probable sockpuppet 17:31, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) +[not my quotation marks] +In addition to the wise words of dab: please do not break up comments of others but instead adress them as a whole — this discussion is unreadable. And Antifinnougric, would you indeed please consider registering and signing your comments using ~~~~? It would certainly help communication, and additionally, it will help you to take credit for your contributions to Wikipedia. ¶ (talk) 22:17, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) +I guess its a valid point that I could look up these words, but my point was that in order to make sense of the Latin words into a system that I and most modern readers would be familiar with, the article as written essentially requires the reader to learn about a third set of units which are not at all relevant (except very tangentially) to either the topic of the article or the conventional systems in use today. It's almost like having an English-Latin dictionary which asks you to see the corresponding entry in a Russian dictionary to properly clarify the meanming of the terms being discussed. None of the other weights and measures articles in wikipedia have headwords that are not the actual term used in the original context, so it seems to me this is the article that should be changed to match the general pattern. +10:14, 3 May 2007 Parjay (Talk | contribs) (7,585 bytes) (2nd warnings) Wow, I really scared now! O.O Parjay, get over it and get over yourself, hon. Do the world a favor, just eat shit and die. ^.^ 8D - ShadowFox S.T.A.R.S. +" More active research is going on at http://www.qbwiki.com/wiki/Battle_of_the_Brains (it looks like this page was mostly copied from there). That page always uses ""Maggie Walker"" to refer to the ""Governor's School"" for clarity, as it is aimed at a national audience that may not be concerned with when specific schools in Richmond changed their names. It also has more info on Battle of the Brains prior to 1985. " +"lol. Regardless of intent or accident - I actually wish that GoingBatty would listen to my request and avoid pages that I'm working on. GoingBatty was (and still is) not interested in Brazilian Hip Hop unless he's a secret gangster rapper. Maybe after a hard day in the hood with his scout charges this scoutmaster relaxes by expressing himself through rap. Anyway I'm bored by him and a whole bunch of other editors - all of whom seem to be here either as incognito moralists, conservatives, protectors of childhood, nationalists, etc. I imagine that many of the neo-nazi groups are here also. Its my experience of right-wingers that on the whole they don't want you to know what they are up too. I remember an arts center open mic night which I was attending being infiltrated by five or six or them. It was a surreal situation because none of them were actually musicians - they pretended to be comedians which allowed them the right to attend and perform. The woman who ran the night and who had no idea of how the BNP (British National Party) worked had put one of them in charge. I emailed the arts center due to the fact that I knew some of the people who ran the open mic nights (including the woman who had been put in overall charge and had made the decision to put him in charge) and got an email back saying the open mic nights were for everyone regardless of their political views. A week or two later I received another email saying that the arts center had decided to separate the comedy from the music by having separate nights for both. I'm not too sure why but I do know that at one of the open mic nights the leader of this small BNP cell had been put in charge and after one of the singers had finished (she was colored) he said something that was really strange. I can't say what because people who were there may be reading this but it was racist. About a hundred people witnessed and heard what he said and everyone just sat silently in shock not knowing how to react - after all he was in charge. Now that is power. When you can persuade others that your intent is one thing and then position yourself to impose your will or views upon those who believe your original lie - well that is political power. Its not even a right wing thing since many left wing leaders have used to same ploy. It is the nature of a dogmatic personality who is seeking power to follow such a course when faced with opposition to their dogma. Here's what happened after the torrent scene released the membership list of the BNP and I spotted that one of them was a town planning consultant employed by my local council. I sent an email to my council of course. Evidently my council believe that hiring a BNP member as a town planning consultant for one of the most highly diverse ethnic towns in England was fine because his racist views shouldn't affect his ability to provide good advice. lol Sicko. Mike Godwin was sooo right. ''¡digame!¿que pasa?'' That old chestnut Godwin's Law. Here's a new one: Sluffs Law - whenever anyone throws Godwin's Law at you then you can assume that they are not a member of a minority and have no idea of what you are talking about. lol END END END One Corpse Too Many vandalism of reference's url Thanks for all your changes to spelling, date formats, use of dashes, etc in this entry. I did not appreciate that you randomly altered part of the long string that is the url for Ref 8 in the article. I have fixed it now, so the link goes directly to the google book of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica article on Shrewsbury Castle, on page 1022. Please leave that unchanged. I do not understand why you are undoing links to the 'year in literature' articles, and to the 'year in British television' articles. It took me time to get each book in its proper year, and to make sure the television adaptations were correctly described as to series, episode and year, and matching that overall page as well as IMDb information. Not every novel was adapted for television. So I put those links back, for consistency across The Cadfael Chronicles articles in Wikipedia, the 20 novels and one short story collection. Is this some new rule in Wikipedia, though the articles for the year in literature and year in television still exist? There is general consensus that [ +" The name of the street was ""Blekingegade"". Just like the name of the city of Helsingør is just that. Could you provide the policy that supports your name change please? " +Signed Wikzilla. Thank Freepsbane! +" Ahoy What's it like being the dweeb bitch of a worthless gawk cow? You should just move to DC and stick it to 'er, since she's lonely. Oh, that's right; you don't have the right equipment. Sorry, dipshitboy. Fucking moron. Justice will prevail over you ""vandal""-chasing idjuts. We're gonna fuck ya, and fuck ya good. No quarter. " +(Taken from CBC Archives: http://archives.cbc.ca/IDC-1-71-2425-14165/conflict_war/firstworldwar/) • On April 24, 1915 the Germans used chlorine gas against the Canadian First Division at the Second Battle of Ypres. With the wind in the German’s favour, anything short of a full retreat would have put the Canadians in the path of the gas. Realizing the only fresh air was at the German line, the Canadians pushed forward, breathing through water- or urine-soaked rags as makeshift gas masks. (It was believed that the ammonia in the urine would neutralize the chlorine.) • The Canadians held their ground until they were reinforced by British troops a day and a half later. The battle earned the Canadian forces great respect, though it came at a cost of some 6,000 men, and ended in a stalemate. +" Hi Mdebellis. Thank you for the help. Please see Human Genome. I welcome your interest. At the same time, I was looking for something broader than one additional pair of eyes. My intent was to broaden the editorial reviewing to anyone of an anthropological, historical, philosophical bent who knows about and is interested in identity and variation in biology (the genetic code metaphor, genotypes, genomes, etc.). Currently, there are three intensely interested editors who share the same point of view on the subject but who have not been exposed to the idea of types in science. Consequently, they think my contribution is ""soapboxing"" and/or original research. While I have modified my contribution to make it more true to the sources cited, they do not think there is any connection between my paragraph and the sources cited. People who know there is a large literature on the issue of the implications of the human genome concept will know that the idea of the human genome type is pretty well-known and not my creation. " +Well Hey There How are you +HELLO. YES THIS IS PILIF. Pilif12p +I pooped out around World War I, and left notes for Tony. Some uneven wiki-linking, I left a lot of inline comments in the text, and some of the sources might be personal websites, need a closer look. +Nice rant there from a Yank with a North American bias, the article had actually been named Mega Drive longer than it has been named Sega Genesis so by your fail logic, you fail94.172.127.37 +" Wealth and Justice sections These two sections do not in any obvious way relate to the academic theory of ""white privilege"". Instead, they seem to be direct arguments that whites occupy a privileged position in society for various sociological reasons, which could equally well imply racism or overt oppression, rather than the more subtle form of racial misrepresentation presupposed by WPT. do we have sources that tie these discussions in these sections directly into the academic literature? if not, we should probably remove them per wp:COATRACK. Ludwigs2 " +Thank you for experimenting with the page August 28 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Expert Categorizers Why is there no mention of the fact that Nazis were particularly great categorizers? They excelled in identifying various things and writing about them and putting them in their proper places. +Link About the link, why do you not take a look at this. This is why I told you that there are two types of seating capacity. In the main page, it is stated states that there are 240 seats (rounded up from 239), and only in the cabin layout page it is stated there are 261 seats. +you behaves as though () +I'm blocked from touching it, I placed the maintenance tag that stated it was a new page and the tag clearly states to give it a couple of weeks, do I need to be a lawyer to get anything done without interference. Check monster.com look up OSP. I think I am being scrutinized unfairly, I wish to take up Wildthing on his offer to help because all anybody else is doing is in my book harassment. ( ) +But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you block him before it's too late? 68.98.224.182 +"::::::::How many articles are we talking about? Examples? Also if people can get away with (required reading) I don't think you'll have much to worry about. 303 " +" I have looked over the history of the page and at some times vandalism accounts for over 70% of contributions. So it isn't a case of might get vandalised but is getting vandalised all the time. At this stage I dread to think how many names on there legally could sue the posters over their inclusion. A quick glance spotted a couple. Robbie Williams, for example, has just won a defamation case yet we still had him in as debated when legally it has been ruled that there is nothing debatable about his orientation!!! Frankly, given the legal complexities with listing people here I'd go further and advocate that either the page be deleted as too much of a defamation risk, or be kept semi-protected to stop the constant adding in of vandalistic edits by anonymous editors who edit no pages but this one. It might be an idea to protect the page completely for a day while a couple of users sifted through all the names on it to make sure that there are no defamationary claims sitting there that weren't spotted by those honorable editors like Bearcat who spent their time constantly stopping vandalism here. But as vandalism is a constant reality, not merely a theoretical possibility, I think semi-protection is allowable here. \(caint) " +When do Sunnis tell truth or are honest? They are the most corrupt (in all sense) and prejudiced people in the world. Feel free to check how Pakistani law and Sunni society treats non-Sunnis. +Saw Meagre is spelt thusly. I suggest changing to Safari, it has a spellcheck built in. +" Benon, thanks for your ""interference"" here, it was welcome. I have begun some copyedit of Enemies of Batman, although at times it is hard to make out what T-Man is trying to say. I will try to keep the framework of the current concept, though, and have filled in years of first appearances where missing. " +Thanks, Tony Thanks, Tony. I will continue to assist. +" Thanks Hahc. I'll start on it tomorrow. Don't ever worry about the time it takes. We both have busy lives and there is no rush. My plan is to take my time so that it really sinks in and I understand it. TRA! ``` Talk " +REDIRECT Talk:Russia–United Kingdom relations +AND YOU, YAMLA, CAN BLOW IT OUT OF YOUR BIG FAT ASS!! DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT I GIVE A FLYING FUCK WHAT YOU DO? OF COURSE NOT!!! BAN ME FOR YOU IF YOU MUST!!!! PROTECT THIS PAGE!!!!! I WILL NOT BE CENSORED OR SILENCED BY THE LIKES OF YOU, YOU PANSY-ASSED SHIT-EATING MOTHER-FUCKER!!!!!! I ASSERT MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, AND I FURTHER ASSERT THAT YOU CAN SUCK MY COCK!!!!!!!! MUHEEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Stop this editor from vandalizing the article then, and removing official references and making false statemens all the time then, and perhaps other contributors who actually improve the article won't tell him he's a f**k head vandal. 220.253.42.94 +" The subject homophobia and the definition of the term homophobia are not the same thing. The subject of homophobia is (in short) the fear or hatred of gays, or discrimination or prejudice against them. The AFA is a recognized part of a body of groups, people, and ideas that define modern-day homophobia. There's no way you can deny that, even if you believe that the label is undeserved, that the label could be pejorative in a non-encyclopedic context, or that somehow being categorized under ""homophobia"" and being an organization somehow equates to being categorized as ""homophobic organization."" The categories ""homophobic organization"" and ""homophobe"" were deleted because they are, grammatically, constructed to specifically modify or describe the subject in question. ""Homophobia"" is not, and these false analogies may make it seem like we're out go get the AFA, but we aren't. Although Sam seems to think it's an irrelevant personal comment, it is the case, Hal, that since you got here, you've been arguing that the AFA's opinion of itself should more of a part of the article, and that criticism should not be. Miles have been spun about how much of a big deal this is, that we're gay activists, that we're creating attack articles, that the category homophobia is a pejorative attack on whatever it labels. Now, Sam, I know you'll insist on removing this part of my comment (editing/censoring others' comments is a practice that is, by the way, fairly dubious). But remember that we are supposed to discuss the issue at hand, not the character of others - I'm not attacking Hal's character. But his history of editing for the sake of the AFA is completely relevant to this discussion and a part of the issue at hand - it explains why he believes we've constructed an attack article (hardly), why the category is a pejorative attack or accusation (clearly not), and why it must be eventually removed. I agree with Hal: it could be taken as a pejorative, and what concerns me is that it is, but only (as far as I can tell) by someone who's made it clear that portraying the AFA in a positive light is very important (no matter [[WP:UNDUE|what that entails). " +Yes, I agree, I made a mistake. But see message below, I have clarified what caused the confusion. +@ Okay, king of the Wikipedia Nazis! But I wasn't going to add Sony Pictures Animation's template to it and I learn my lesson. I just wanted to delete that note there because it is not need and stupid like you. Go to hell you freedom of speech killing Nazi and fuck you to hell!! +" You are making a big mistake: You removed my reliable source. THis is what you removed - including the reliable source - reliable as per Ladislav Mecir a very accomplised editor: Although bitcoin is not legally banned in terms of Russian law, it is in fact banned by the authorities on a de facto basis. On the other hand it is also true that there may be many millions of USD (it is a big economy) worth of bitcoins present today in Russia on computers owned by Russians since they bought them from and paid for them in Russian Roubles on exchanges accessible to them outside Russia - and that this practice most probably would continue with an equivalent increase in the number and value of bitcoins inside Russia. Please revert your false allegations against me including that I am attacking other editors: I have a reliable source: you simply state: ""Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article."" I had a source: it is in the Bitcoin article history for all to see. Please apologise and revert your false allegations immediatly. " +" Well, the statement indeed is wrong, puzzling, and misinformed. Although it has been in the text for a very long time, my prior experience with defining ""Europe"" has not been very good and for this reason I have been wary of making any changes. Nevertheless, I do think that this is something that needs to be addressed. If you have a better wording to offer - and any wording can be more correct then this one - let us know. " +lol I have just seen the shiny Achilles, mark of greek nationalism on the admins CIreland page, oh ho ho, jsut say so, i would not even try to argument... +Hi! Hello, there, how are you? I would like to ask you about the Manchukuo website I found. I have a question, is that website a forum site? I first thought it was the official government website based on the title. I first found the site when I was researching the International recognition of Kosovo (Manchukuo is now removed from the list). Can you please tell me about this site. Thank you. +Syed Ahmed Khan Hi - Yes actually I've still got a lot of info to add to the article. Your comment is right - I was writing in context of the partition of India, which happened 50 years after Khan's death and thus is not properly explained or directly relevant to this article. Thanks for your comments, but do check back in the coming weekend. Rama's arrow +Sources needed: we can discuss specific published secondary analysis of such a case if it exists. Note that the design argument is a theological proposition, not a claim. To avoid this becoming too simplistic, be aware that we discuss in the article another related proposition centered [largely] on the design argument, creation science, which like ID claims that its religious view is science and should be taught in public school science classes. . . , talk +Vandalism originating at IP address 198.179.227.59 (and 58) My apologies. This computer is located in a large bookstore with 50+ employees (and God only knows how many ex-employees who know how to access Wikipedia). Those of us who respect the site attempt to keep an eye on things, but it is difficult. Also, I'm sure that some of the vandalisms are actually just stupid mistakes by inexperienced occasional users (if that makes a difference). I'm a registered user myself, and hate to see this computer blocked. If it gets to that point again, I will divulge my user name so we can discuss it un-anonymously.198.179.227.59 +" POTD notification ]] Mr Milburn, Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Great Britain Snowy.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 21, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-12-21. '''''' {chat} " +Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 28, 2015 Hi, not sure if you're still around. I'm going to be finished shortly with a summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC, to appear on the Main Page soon. Was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) +" in past 100 years pashtun ruler keep the Hazara under control and never let a honest and fear accontinlity to see how many Hazara are, i am hazara myself and i can tell you that there are more the 16M hazara in the world and more then 8M hazara live only in Afghanistan, is that not enough that i am hazara and telling you that to not change the numbers,so lets be honest and dont change your from Pakistan believing other people acoountnility not the accountbility of Hazara that keep telling you we are more then 16M and you don't believe, WOW WHAT A WORLD WE LIVE,""" +" I have engaged in dialogue on the talk page and my views are in line with the views of a good number of members of Wiki project ""plants"". The fact that a clearly organised group of disruptive editors have descended upon that article in order to bully their vandalism in through the back door is the only reason that a consensus for my version does not now exist - it existed this afternoon. " +"""AbrahamIsaac"" was very clearly a spammer. " +Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2014 Height = 5 ft 11 1/2 in (1.82m) +Larkin statue I have just carefully updated this section. And talking about the discussion page, in future users who want to make radical changes and delete links should practice what they preach and post here first. +"""Just cause"" clearly favors the US government view of the conflict while Cold war does not favor any side. " +Considering that he's threating me and trying to intimidate me rather than let a mediation process unfold I doubt he should be an administrator. I'm new but I am at least trying to follow community standards, you on the other hand consistantly seem to irritate people. I note someone else has a new complaint regarding your editing and that you were blocked by the 3 Revision Rule. The preponderance of evidence clearly shows who is in the wrong. +It's funny how you have being prosecuiting my editions, undoing my editions, asking me to provide sources and while I provide them eraising it. I think that it's unfair the censure that you are trying to do based on a very strict and partial interpretation of Wikipedia's rule. +" re: UEFA Euro 2008 and talk:UEFA Euro 2008 Has it occurred to you that you're a massive dick? .Alpaugh " +" Image:Watson Brown.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Watson Brown.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ☠ " +Tagging of Deep Cover (comic strip) I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Deep Cover (comic strip). I do not think that Deep Cover (comic strip) fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because technically, comic strips are not covered by A7. I request that you consider not re-tagging Deep Cover (comic strip) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. You are, of course, free to tag the article with or nominate it at WP:AFD. +Truth That's fine, go ahead and block me. Doesn't change the undeniable fact that Chris is an asshole. +" And why should ""mainstream"" be given exclusive priority? / " +" Mkay. Back to my original comment: ""... tagging a page as A1 within two minutes of creation is way too fast. See WP:CSD#A1."" " +" Wolters is such an excellent example. Can Voorhis live up to that? Nixon was his own worst enemy. — (Talk) " +":In an interpreted language your source code is read in command by command by a software tool, which is called the Interpreter and executed. What ? Command-by-command ? No interpreter is using such crappy technique nowadays. Taw From Interpreted Language/Talk some languages (like Perl) are compiled at runtime Could you elaborate ? Taw Every time a perl script is run, Perl compiles it and then runs the compiled code. At least, this is the usual way of using perl, although it's not the only way. Zundark, 2001 Dec 15 You mean compile to syntactic tree or compile to machine code ? Taw I believe it's compiled to bytecode, much like Java. As of perl 5.6 (version?), it's possible to produce a bytecode version of a perl program to save the compilation step. I think the bytecode can be converted back to full source as well, but I'm not as sure about that. Indigo Perl (http://www.indigoperl.com) produces a perl compiler that produces a machine executable, but I think the resulting executable consists of both the actual bytecode and enough of the perl engine to run the bytecode, so they tend to be rather large. Their advantage is being able to deploy the code to machines that don't necessarily have the Perl interpreter installed. They have versions for both Windows and Unix-ish platforms. Wesley Old Interpreted Language article An interpreted language is a type of programming language that is not compiled into machine code, but is interpreted at run-time by the computer, and translated into machine understandable code as required. It is often a mistake to refer to a language as either ""interpreted"" or ""compiled"", because most languages can be implemented in either way, and some languages (like Perl) are compiled at runtime but behave as if they were interpreted. Other languages, like Java, may be partially compiled into an intermediate form which is then interpreted (although that, too, might be compiled). Some languages, though, are specifically designed to favor interpretation. An example of an interpreted language is JavaScript. Is Java interpreted, or what? The Java programming language article says: ""The first implementations of the language used an interpreted virtual machine to achieve portability, and many implementations still do. These implementations produce programs that run more slowly than the fully-compiled programs created by the typical C++ compiler and some later Java language compilers, so the language suffered a reputation for producing slow programs. More recent implementations of the Java VM produce programs that run much faster, using multiple techniques."" The Java language is compiled, always. It is designed as a compiled language, and is implemented as a compiled language. It is often compiled into bytecode, which is then interpreted (with a virtual machine). I think the Java language article is correct, but maybe it could be worded better. LDC Yes, and you can also compile Jave straight down to machine code if you like. The above claim that it is a mistake to differentiate between interpreted and compiled languages is IMHO incorrect; every language that has an ""eval"" statement which lets you construct and evaluate statements on the fly can never be cleanly compiled down to machine code; you will always have to embed an interpreter in your compiled code. AxelBoldt Way too much mess here has been caused by lack of clear definition of ""compiling"". It is used in two distinct meanings, as in: compiled to machine code (or assembly) compiled to byte code/parse tree/some other internal representation I think it's wrong to call languages that use the second way ""compiled"". In such case there would be virtually no interpreted language in use - no language uses line-by-line parsing nowadays, all ""compile"" source to some form of internal representation. Quote from FOLDOC: Compiler A program that converts another program from some {source language} (or {programming language}) to {machine language} (object code). Some compilers output {assembly language} which is then converted to {machine language} by a separate {assembler}. ... " +hi i am right but i donot know about source i cAN NOT NO SOURCE +So intentionally breaking policies isn't vandalism? That's new to me. +" Rugby By any chance, are you from Fiji, you seem to know a lot about Fiji Rugby players.? ..styles " +My block has expired many hours ago, but I demand it to be backdate-cancelled officially: some admin should make a respective record in my block log. The case will not be closed until the actions of +would see that it clearly meets these standards, because it provides accurate, timely, and comprehensive tracking of stimulus spending in the interests of providing transparency to the American people. Shame on you, Loonymonkey! +List of managers Hey, thanks for the warning. I thought if that when i edited it, but didnt believed it could be controversial. Anyway, thanks again -) +Edit warring You are both getting exactly the same message here. I've fully protected two pages for 3 days. I expect to see you discussing the changes on the talk pages during this time and attempting to come to some sort of consensus. You are both technically in breach of the 3RR, but I feel that it is best for the project to try and get you both discussing the changes you're trying to make. I've watchlisted both the articles and if I see edit warring when the protection expires, I'm going to start blocking. (talk) +Take a look at , talk page blanking of a VaughanWatch socks' page. Probably another sock - +"They aren't ""questionable"". READ the article, it says ""Jacobson cursed the University of Notre Dame"" and the source is cited. Fuck is a curse word buddy, and she said ""Fuck Notre Dame"", ""Fuck Touchdown Jesus"" and ""Fuck Jesus"". Why would ESPN have released a statement if she didn't say it? Think man. They are hiding what she said for a reason. " +It wasn't me, my brother was using the comp. - +"From Gh87: This image is now sourced as this: ""For promotion of the television show Passions, the image was released by NBC's press office to various media outlets in 1999 to promote the named programme. As Wikipedia is a non-profit organisation, it's usage does not violate the terms of it's original release - which was to help promote and visulise viewers with the cast of the named series.""In other words, your image will not be deleted as the promo image is proven a fair use." +Thanatosimii, read my latest messages regarding the Hurrian and Urartu pages. +With this question, you can refer to one from these editor!MrPenguin20 or Kami888 +That's reasonable enough; I just saw the conflict on this one page and not on the rest. I don't know details of it either, and if I had noticed the rest I probably would have been suspicious also (like Mav, below). Also like mav, though, I probably would have noted why I reverted any changes on the article's talk page. Best, +" To LongHair- etu brute [] see: Images from Scorpio80 - you are no longer a ""good guy""!!!!" +Ah, i see now. The game is a new game that is finishing it's beta trials. It is advertised on several websites such as BBG site and on the Officers Club site . Is this enough or is the game too new? +"So besides being brainwashed by a cult what is your reason for censoring this?? Just curious?? Choudary has said that anyone becoming intoxicated by alcohol should be given 40 lashes in public. He claimed alcohol was ""the root of all evil” and that ""Islam additionally imposes 40 lashes in public for deliberate intoxication, followed by 80 lashes in public if repeated for a second time.”. " +" In addition, he's made inappropriate comments in edit summaries, and on the Michael Collins talk page he told me I needed to ""get it into your thick head"" that I was wrong.Malke2010 " +No need to be paranoid. I have the right to make legitimate edits in any articles. +Modification to ? Gimmetrow, We are having a discussion here about starting a list of former DYK articles that have become good or featured content, and the way we're going about it is by placing such articles into Category:Wikipedia Did you know articles that are featured articles or Category:Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles by adding that text in a parser function within the credit template that goes on article talk pages. Dr pda, though, just pointed out that a lot of FAs don't have the template on the talk page anymore, to avoid talkpage clutter, and instead have the DYK mentioned in , meaning that if we wanted to go forward with this we would probably have to add some code in to put the talkpage into one of those categories if has both DYK and GA/FC. Dr pda said that you're the person to ask about this template, so I was just wondering if you would have an estimate of how much work it might be to make this happen, and whether or not it would cause problems with other things. Thanks, — talk/contribs PS I just recently started using for fixing refs, and I love it! — talk/contribs +GA on Hold notice GA on Hold, with review, at Talk:2012 tour of She Has a Name/GA1. Shouldn't be too hard to address. ) Cheers, — '''''' +Hammer House of Horror Thanks for adding so much info to the article, however I had to fix a number of errors in your text on one of the episodes. 109.157.82.51 +Sorry, a landslide is a completely different thing from a rock avalanche +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Guy Fawkes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. S | talk " +", 6 March 2010 (UTC) You can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 19:03" +How does the offspring of my grandfather and a woman who is not my mother become my half-sister? +Yeah yeah yeah, .........STILL HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +But I am not a vandal. I am a constructive Wikipedia editor. Why won't you believe me? I am a sensitive person and I've done nothing wrong. Please believe me. - ClayMort 7/2/07. +- Why? Why do you have the power to block me but I don't have the power to block you? +" Also know as I don't think it should say ""also known as ""Teenage Wastleland"", I think it should say ""often mislabed as ""Teenage Wasteland"". It is also the most mislabled song of all time, that should be somewhere on the page, if you need proof go on Google and put in ""Rolling Stone Baba O'Riley"" or ""VH1 Bab O'Riley""." +Jackie never tried to leap out of the car. She just got and grabbed JFK's head. +" Color Hi Quiddity. I would like to ask for your advice. There's a Wikitable in my Sandbox, but it seems I have been having problems about choosing the right color for the job. I think the color for Piano 2 hands, Piano 4 hands, Two pianos 4 hands, Stage music, Trio, Organ, and Orchestra with solo instrument are ok, but the others look too intense. I believe pastel colors might have a better effect. Maybe you could suggest something, thanks ! TK " +" Heh, no inconvenience really! Thanks for the semi. It possibly isn't even needed, but as it's the half of the main bone of apparent contention at the AfD... well, it seemed like a good idea? Thanks for helping! • Lawrence Cohen " +((unblock)) cause i said so +Hi Hey Ebyabe... Look listen... I'm sorry about the way I acted towards you, BMK and MarntteD. I completely lost my temper there for a while, I came out of retirement and I realize now that retiring from the wiki won't solve my problems. I just couldn't understand that well about information I've been getting and that's why I lost my temper at that point, I came on the wiki 2 months ago because I want to make articles a lot better for everyone when they do research and I want to stop vandalism too that IP users put false information in articles. I still feel a little guilty for the way I acted towards you guys, and I want to let you, BMK and MarntteD know that I'm sorry, because I didn't mean to lose my temper. And I didn't mean for those things I said too. So please, I just want to bag from you, please don't report me at all, because I'm sorry. I'm really sorry for the way I acted and I know leaving the wiki won't solve it at all, it will only make it worse for me. So, I really hope you forgive me and I hope we can get a long a lot better now. Have a good day. +"Hi , I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles o) First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first. Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it. For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (). Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work. Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you. One last thing to keep as a motto: ""It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!"" (talk …stalk!) How references work Simple references These require two parts; a) Chzz is 98 years old. ""The book of Chzz"", Aardvark Books, 2009. He likes tea. [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] b) A section called ""References"" with the special code ""{{reflist}}""; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:/reftest and try it out. Named references Chzz was born in 1837. ""The book of Chzz"", Aardvark Books, 2009. Chzz lives in Footown. Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. Citation templates You can put anything you like between and , but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs. Something to make your life easier! Hi there ! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references. You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in co +I like all of your icons and flashing lights that don't work. +"== August 2010 == Hello, Kipperster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Craig%20Langdon have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  " +REDIRECT Talk:A Girl Like You (Cliff Richard and The Shadows song) +There are many things I'd like better than to see you gone. I'd like to see you contributing to Wikipedia in your usual high-quality manner, and I'd like to see you involved in less heat and static. I'd like to see you not show up in WQA threads that are easily avoidable. I certainly recall seeing you choose to say or do things that would obviously and inevitably lead to heat and static, and then when shit happened, you played dumb about it. You're not naïve, and you can't fool me into thinking that you are. So, yeah, I'd like to see less of that kind of nonsense. I'd like to see your good work continue, and your unnecessarily provocative bullshit end. That's a pretty reasonable desire, isn't it? - +Article is on editing process... Greetings to all Editors! This article is on-going process of revision and editing, please give us more time to work for it. The person in this article is notable, he do have a lot of contributions and achievement not only here at Asia, Europe and across America. I included all the possible references and links to support his notability. Any consideration to this is highly appreciated and with thanks. Best Regards. Turki Faisal Al Rasheed +" Proposed deletion of Ahmad El Bashiti Ahmad El Bashiti has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the ""prod"" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. (Talk) " +January 2008 (UTC) Decent. More important news, HIM! GRAMMY! YES?! 09:59, 23 +" Thanks - judging from what's been written, I think I might have made a new friend this past couple of days. I knew it was a good idea to keep my blank verse up there... talk " +Lastly, it does not legitimise it if I did it whilst bored in a study period. However, as this formed part of a lesson (a marketing exercise: I can’t place products on the site, so I used a person) +I am sorry that your edits were removed from the article. I did not remove them, although I did think about how to edit that material. I will look further at what you wrote on my talk page when I get a chance. I am in agreement with your distaste at Ward Churchill putting himself forth as a spokesman for the Native community but even more at those who have accepted him as a spokesman, like the people at the University of Colorado who put him on a fast tenure track, bypassing others, most of whom were not even interviewed. However, judging from his appearance I do think he probably has some Native American ancestory and feel we should take his word for it. The real issues have to do with his actions and ideas. 18:11, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC) Thank you for the response. I don't disagree with his right to speak. I don't agree with a lot he has to say, but that is irrelavant. He does have a First Amendment right to state it. I just believe that he should be held out as an Indian, when he isn't. That's all. And I don't believe that we should take his word for itconcerning his alleged Indian heritage. I know that you have your opinion concerning that and that's fine. I'm not trying to convince you but it IS an issue for most people in Indian Country. I forward to your respons. 20:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" Can anyone doubt that Arab refusal to recognize the Jewish state was the cause of the Six-Day War? Pre-war rhetoric was fill with blood-curdling chants of ""itbach al-yahud"" or ""slaughter the Jews."" This mantra was repeated over and over. Moreover, there was no ""occupation"" before the Six-Day War. Yet the Arabs, led by Egypt, still called for ""throwing the Jews into the sea."" So the question is why? why would they want to throw the Jews into the sea if there was no ""occupation."" the reason stems from the fact that the source of the conflict has nothing to do with the so-called ""occupation"" and everythingg to do the persistent Arab refusal to recognize a so-called ""foreign implant"" or Western dhimmi presence in the ""plundered soil of Palestine."" Therefore, this edit is accurate and adds balance. In truth, I'd rather see the entire sentence that precededs it, The status of the Israeli-occupied territories and the concurrent refugee problem, are central concerns in the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, raising issues in international law, and having far-reaching consequences in global affairs, removed per the concerns raised by Cptnono. Also, it constitutes WP:SYNTH. It is summary opinion that doesn't belong and it is not encyclopedic. So I propose that either my edit be allowed to remain or in the alternative, the entire aforementioned sentence be removed. " +Bret has three Grandparents born in Germany, and one born in Barbados .... check his family tree ... http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/s/c/h/RobertJ-Schundler/TREE/0002tree.html#inst +The Band On their website, they have all their email addresses. Try emailing Jimmy, perhaps he'll be cooperative getting some Law facts to you, they deserve their place here. Here's the website http://www.murphyslawnyc.com/ I think they also have a myspace site as well. How the Offspring ripped-off Panty Raid has got to be woven in there somewhere...(my little two cents).. -) +As with all coins, the value depends on the condition of a coin, its rarity, and the state of the market the rarest coin will be worth nothing if no-one wants to buy it where it is being offered for sale. That said, the British grading system for coins works like this (I will not touch the lunatic American grading system with 70 different grades!):- Poor coins are very worn, and most of the detail of the coin will have gone, but you're still able to tell what type of coin it is. Fair coins are well worn, but more of the detail of the coin is visible, and it is easy to identify the coin. Good coins will have almost all the lettering readable, and the date will be easy to read in most cases. Very Good coins will have all the coin readable, and some of the finer details of the design can start to be made out. Fine coins will have the details of the coins taking shape, and the coin is starting to become collectable if it's fairly recent. Very Fine coins will have all the details clear, and there will be wear only on the high points of the design, and most of the fine details shows clearly. Extremely Fine coins will have wear on only the highest points of the design. Uncirculated coins will have no wear on the high points of the design at all, though faults in the engraving, or wear on the die, may mean that the design may not be fully struck. Under no circumstances should collectible coins be cleaned or polished this will destroy at least half its' collectible value. Coming back to your 1862 penny, values for a bog-standard penny in UK Pounds, in Britain, are: F - GBP 4 VF - GBP 10 EF - GBP 40 UNC - GBP 70 Lower grades are not worth anything much. Multiply by 1.6 to get a US $ figure, then discount any amount for reduced interest in the coins in the States! 18:10 3 Jul 2003 (UTC) +" Sitush, You are missing too many things, Ahir being only a subclass of Yadav and artile mentioning Ahir as non-elite can not be used in the lead to mention all Yadavs as ""non-elite"".Read otrher objections too, you missed all of them. And hang-on, I am confused, If you're saying that Yadavas of lunar dynasty and Krishnauts are same as Yadavs then why are we not putting other citations about Yadavas here and have moved it to Yadava. You are confusing everyone man, and that's why is dubious tag " +hello.i am looserman11.please be nice and i will be nice back +" Gwen Gale, this could not have come at a better time. I really need a wiki-break. I don't feel badly about it. Although it was not my intention to violate 3RR, I'm just not good at keeping track. Anyhow, one editor who I admire a lot, " +star wars sucks peoplw with no lives like that gay stuff +{{unbloc +Pilecki's organisation1940-43 Years before Vrba-Wetzler! To quote: From October 1940, ZOW sent reports to Warsaw, and beginning March 1941, Pilecki's reports were being forwarded via the Polish resistance to the British government in London. These reports were a principal source of intelligence on Auschwitz for the Western Allies. Pilecki hoped that either the Allies would drop arms or troops into the camp, or the Home Army would organize an assault on it from outside. +" Non-commercial notability This article seems to more than fill the requirements from Notability for non-commercial organizations. So what's the definition of commercial? I also notice that the intro to the notability for organizations and companies makes allowances for smaller organizations. In other words they can still be notable even if they don't get the secondary coverage that larger organizations get. I think this organization qualifies for that as well. (chat) " +Mach's picture of a bullet The article now says The first to discover this shock was Ernst Mach in his original picture showing a bullet in a supersonic flow that cause the oblique shock. Is this talking about this picture? I think this is a picture of a bullet fired into stationary air, while the sentence above seems to say that it's being fired into air that was already moving at supersonic speeds. I suggest discussing this at Talk:shock wave#Mach's picture of a bullet since there is already discussion there, although I suspect a change in wording in this article is required. +" said he unblocked me early, but I'm still unable to made edits. " +Info Related to Date and place of birth would be welocme. +Agnes Moorehead was listed as having lung cancer. In her bio it states that she died of Uterine Cancer, fixed. +Gee, I could have sworn I posted a constructive comment here. Must have gone into a wormhole, or been fascistisized. 68.240.150.91 +" Eucosmia What does the word mean? Hi - I'd be happy to be rid of Eucosmia if it is of no use. My only interest in it is its similar spelling to Eucosma, Euosmia, etc. I tried to find a definition for eucosmia but it is not in Wiktionary or any other online dictionaries or other etymology resources as far as I can tell. Is it a Latin or Greek word? The only reference I could find was that it means ""decorum"" from Pythagoras of Samos (ca. 570–496 B.C.) . But I'm no expert on molluscs or Latin words, so its your call! (I'll post this on Invertzoo's talk page too). Thanks, " +Wikimedia Stories Project Hello, My name is Victor Grigas, and I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation. We're telling stories of Wikipedia users, editors, donors, programmers and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia - for the 2011 fundraiser. I am in the process of planning a trip to India to gather stories from Indian Wikipedians in face-to-face interviews (possibly on video). My primary goal is to conduct 15-20 interviews, and hopefully enough of my interviews will make compelling stories that will effectively solicit donations from the public. These stories may also be used for other communication purposes by the foundation. I found your userpage on a list of prolific Wikipedians and thought I’d reach out to you. Prolific editing is always a good story to tell! If you are interested in participating, please contact me via my email: vgrigas@wikimedia.org Thank you for your time! Victor About me: I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005, and have a background in film, video and audio. My userpage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas +YOU ARE A FAGGIT. DARRY WAS HERE AS A FAGGIT. LET ME TALK TRASH TO KURT WARNER. +If it were to be semi-protected, a sub page for IP editors to contact him would have to be set up. Totally unacceptable without it. +" Template editor Laser, started on the medical editnotices, but seems to be off for the day now. Do you know if it is possible to change my userrights so that I can edit templates? (Talk) " +There were too many of them warning me about the same thing and a few other users' edits do not seem to be in good faith to me. +never knew.. i never knew that. well lesson learned. i guess..... +Tyren Morrison Is A Sick Kent!! The Title says it all!! Tyren Morrison is probably the maddest cunt going around! all of the bitches should get on his D!! he is great!! All of yous reading this should be jealous! love his dick! okay bitches! LOVE IT! +"I dont see why ""Cumhuriyet"" is not a relaiable source. Certainly it has a secularist bias, but it is not suprising that it is a secularist newspaper that challanges Gulen. About Hulki Cevizoglu, your argument doesnt make sense; ""what does ""every knower knows"" mean? Besides, Hulki Cevizolu is hardly the only respected journalist to accuse him. About Veren, are you denying that he was the right hand man of Gulen and is it surprising that he is denounced once he breaks away from the group. 2) Im planning to rewrite the article, my plan is to add the actual events and then provide the views of supporters and adverseries of Gulen on the event. think we can really get a good article out of this, so I would appreciate if you could help me with the Gulen's supporters views of the events. Here are the events that I plan to add a) his anticomunist activities before 1980 b) the rise of the movement through educational activities c) Gulen's political connections d) the tape incident and the ensuing legal battle, gulen's move to the US e) the nurettin veren controversies All the events above are facts, and as I said, i think we might put the two sides of the story for each. I also started editing the existing page. Im aking out highly subjeective comments, like he ""surpassed his peers at an early age"", he insprired generations, he is admired by leading politicians etc. I also added that he is viewed differently by supporters and detractors. Some objective editor should check and verify that these removals are intended to make the article impartial and are not vandalisms. " +":::::: ""You don't know me. How do you know what I am/am not?"" By your actions. Anyway, I already appologized to you. I don't care about the block, that's not why I appologized. - " +Actually, looks like it got deleted before I could finish there. What templates where you using? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kasha. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hi, I didn't add mile, rather all the others besides US, UK, Canada; did you *READ* the four separate references as to where the mile is used in Canada? Not everyone drives a train, but obviously trains are a very important part of the efficient, affordable bulk transportation of goods. Whether or not they are in common use, they are there every day on Canadian railways and every race at the track. This isn't a popularity contest, it's merely a statement of things as they exist in certain aspects of transportation in Canada. If one wants to conduct a locomotive on a Canadian railroad, they had better learn about the mile and the foot or they will have a hard time getting a job. Also, would like to point out that the nautical mile and thousands of feet of altitude are also used exclusively in Canadian airspace; this practice is so prevalent it has spread to one of the most metric countries in the world: Russia. So there are definitely sectors where these units dominate, pop culture aside, and they need to be reported as such. Canada probably shouldn't be the first listing as the mile is only used in specialized sectors. Perhaps hearer to the end along with Puerto Rico and Turks & Caicos? I just left Canada after US UK and put the rest in ABC order because it took a long time to find all those references. Feel free to reorder and otherwise clean it up however you see fit. I also have US Territories (and British?) interspersed with actual independent nations; they should probably be separated. +They are an integral part of the schools core traditions and have been around for decades. They are definitive of the school and one of the reasons why Queen's has arguably the highest level of school pride out of any university in Canada. '''' +" Yes and that is your personal view, what makes your's more important than mine.... Nothing that's what (and that is why I am waiting for other users to comment because one man's opinion should not be enough to dictate how Wikipedia works or is edited and I don't think you know what you mean why is my comment about if he said thrash metal is absent ""illogical"". " +Creating articles Of course I can help. Just let me know what subjects you want to write about and I will point you in the direction of the proper reference sources. Be well. +Since I specifically said I wasn't going to repeat the statement, you're out of line. 24 hours, though? That sounds like an ideal opportunity to spend time looking for the diff - and your statement at ANI suggests that you think I should post it right here on my talk page when I find it. (talk) +Gaming the System. I am familiar with it. You were gaming the system. That's why it's nigh impossible to craft accurate and well-written articles in this anachronistic, dysfunctional, rule-bound system. It's been known for well over a century that rule-bound systems are subject to gaming, which is why they are chaotic and dysfunctional. What I don't understand is what immature and unprofessional people like you are trying to learn by disrupting the process. Can you tell me what you are trying to learn? +Kww. Please do not disrespect Kww in this manner again like you did on his talkpage. He is an admin. Abuser Malleus is fine, he doesn't need you sticking up for him- let him be a man baby! I will not view a reply here. Regards. +" Please stop adding advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. |     talk  " +" Indeed, I'd already looked at that. Given its emphasis upon the archaic nature of this ""preposition"" it may well be relatively harmless, but I'll certainly take another look. Thanks for your understanding. " +Poop boy You. Poop. Poop boy. Poop. Poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop poop boy. Youuuuuuuuuuu! +" Redirects Could someone please create some redirects from ""Search"" for ""concrete raising"" and ""mud jacking"" to this article? This article covers these procedures and we don't have separate pages. Thks. (Can't DIY it. Although someone tried to explain to me how to, I seem to be too daft to get it to work.) 99.11.160.111 " +again stay black *whistles to himself* lalala dont ahve to lsten to u +FUC YOU DALE FUC YOU! +I added a ton of stuff, because frankly this article did not even do this mediocre game justice. (It's somehow entertaining though, once you abandon all hope of it relating to the card game.) if anyone has ever played the xbox live, and by some miracle they see this, and by some miralce they care to share their experience by filling in that section, that would be... well, miraculous. +10th Regiment of Foot The rename may be necessary but how about (British Army) as disamb as the regiment started life in England, then Great Britain and then the UK as the UK evolved. +Retrohead as just spend 10 minutes getting a load of discography pages I have edited together and posted them on my user page,, look Ritchie I know you don't want to get involved and you are busy with your own edits and stuff but I beg you please help me to sort this stuff out I have never dealt with anyone so awkward as him before. +" Kashmir Please check this out. khoi " +Regarding your comment here: +"Rabbi Mordechi Eliyahu, the past Chief Rabbi of Israel after his visit to the Rebbe said. ""I saw that no secret is hidden from him, and I mean that simply and explicitly. He knows all of the Talmud, Poskim (legal precedents) and in the Mystical works his understanding is very very deep. He is the master of light. He is a master of all the Torah. And is an expert on everything that is happening in Israel. His face shines like an angel of G-d and he himself is higher than any angel. He is the greatest Torah master in our generation and no one is even close to him. And together with this he worries for every Jew in the world."" " +YOU SUCK Hello J. Delanoy, U suck. I could totally pwn u in my sleep. Come log on WoW like a real man and we will duel. My death knight rolak will destroy u. In f4ct, u r probably some horde faggot pansy ass blood elf faggot. I could prolly even 1 shot u cus u r a faggot ass pansy bitch whore. U r the biggest noob I have ever seen. LOL u prolly dont even have any ep3x. People like u make me sick. Ur mother is prolly horde too rofl i can prolly pwn u both at the same time. Lol u r prolly an orc to. I one shotted thrall, cus he is the king of the noobs. U prolly didnt even beat kara cus u suck. LOL u prolly dont even tier 9 yet cus u suck that much. My dk had some t8 in bc, ur such a noob that u prolly only had like dungeon tier 1 LOL!!. U r prolly a virgin too. LOL I get laid 8 times a day. Just ask ur mother. I also bang all of the cheerleaders for the football and basketball teams. Oh ya and baseball. I am also the starting qb for our football team. We won the state championship. I threw so many passes. Then I got laid. Yeah, u wish u were as good at life as me. But ur not, cus u suck. U just sit there all day, raiding kara with ur noob welfare ep4x wiping on the horseman LOL. We never wiped on him. U really need to get a life, I mean who doesnt have at least t7 yet srsly?? Add me and well duel and ill destroy ur noob welfare blood elf orc ass. U prolly cant even bring me down to 95% LOL cus u suck noob. U rly suck srsly, ROlak, King of da Death Knights. 68.205.182.184 +" Replaceable fair use Image:Fashid moussavi.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Fashid moussavi.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — " +" The section indirectly cited from the source (http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/risk.htm) reads as follows: ""Another way of looking at risk, is to look at the Relative Risk of 1 in a million chances of dying of activities common to our society."" Risk should maybe be better defined. " +Final decision The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Climate change dispute 2 case. +As it is captioned as 1897 it is likely to qualify under PD-old or similar. If you go to the source file you can download & then zoom to examine the writing in the bottom right (? Hotel * Westgate) It may then be able to trace the hotel which presumably distributed it & therefore get an exact date. You may also be able to zoom to see the detail of the posters displayed - although when I tried this the pixelation was too bad to read. Alternatively (again) why not just contact the Cleveland Pools web site & ask where they got it from?— talk +" Review Thanks so much! talkcontribs " +Hey dog you deserve to be put a leash and beaten. +" I apologize for my inappropriate language earlier. As to the rest, like Halaqah says - not everything has to be cited, and the basic claim in my statement is about as close to ""common knowledge"" as one can get. Columbia says, for instance, that the Bantu ""inhabit most of the continent S of the Congo River except the extreme southwest."" The map in this article shows more or less my point. The revert was clearly a WP:POINT violation because I was arguing with Mel on another talk page. Would Mel revert me if I made an unsourced edit that George W. Bush is President of the United States, or that the Earth is the third planet from the sun, too? " +Speditor Hello. A user whom you blocked requests unblock at User talk:Speditor; you may want to comment. Best, +, or on your suspicions often being correct +" I now replaced ""flip flop"" with ""flip-flop"" in the whole text. Should the page also be moved to ""flip-flip""? We would need to first delete the redirect in the other direction in that case. 13:45, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)" +Andrew Breitbart So how many times does this need to be mentioned? It is currently in the article twice. +" censorship of your talk page is childish, x2 ""If you edit my talk page again, I'm going to seek to have you prevented from doing so. Hipocrite (talk) "" plesae do so, I welcome third-party comment on your behaviour. thankfully, you have little control over the 'view history' page, which I'm sure will be viewed by anyone impartial." +Wake in Fright I have no doubt you mean well, but Aussie posters should be used for Aussie films. Can't find the original Aussie poster, but the one you keep adding back is the original US one. +" Now if there were a page on their website that (1) had detailed information about lymphoma on it AND (2) that information was not included in this article AND (3) that information was of interest to the ""general reader"" (as opposed to primarily patients or physicians) AND (4) that information was different from what the other links provided, then that specific page could probably be justified under Wikipedia's complicated anti-spam guidelines. " +Images Yes, you can delete any images you want. It'll be a good idea to replace them though, because it always help explain these processes with images of the proteins and the reactions catalysed by them. +Hello friends, Hank Chapot from California here. Why is there no information about the pollution legacy of this plant? I am researching gas manufacturing plants in the US, and the pollution story is important. Think about including the legacy of ash, cinder and liquid wasste from huge furnaces. +Which old Rolling Stone issues have articles about Jerry Lee Lewis. I am interested in an article written in the 1970's +Also I'm looking at the second reference in the US section citing the closure of Uniqlo's New Jersey stores from it's first expansion into the US market. +List of recurring characters from The Mighty Boosh See article's talk page +I just wanted to chip in on this, as I certainly remember an older version of OT for the Apple II series. I would have played it sometime in the years 1983-6; probably at the earlier end of that range. The graphics were monochrome, and hunting was very different and quite difficult for me to get the hang of. It was a sort of first-person shooter game, with your (stationary) hunting blind at the bottom of the screen. At varying intervals, a game animal would come trotting horizontally across the screenalmost like a phantom, you remember those early graphics?and you'd hit the fire button to release a cloud of very slow-moving buckshot. If they intersected just right, you got the kill. This rarely worked for me; I remember being delighted when I saw the newer version in middle school. I've never been able to find a downloadable version. Also, the earliest versions of OT seem to have been text-only games for TTY and, later, glass TTY. Those were the ones when you hunted by typing BANG in a specified window of time. +" Patience Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience You continue to amaze! " +Scots The United Kingdom Government isn't an authority on linguistics - it's not a reliable source, as Wikipedia uses the term, for this subject. +How much does it cost to buy your way into the inner circle, where you can do whatever the fuck you want to and anyone who complains gets banned? I have as much disposable income as these other jerks. I think what I shall do, as the owner of HTTP://WWW.CLANYOUNG.INFO is to invoke copywrite and remove my contributions... +" A1 Team Great Britain I must beg you to come with some arguments for your opinion, if you still think the information about the color of the car should not include any words about British racing green. I also want to remind you of the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. The discussion should continue on the talkpage of that article, but I post here so I am sure you get the message. " +Re: WQA Don't put one-time warnings on talk pages when you DO NOT have admin rights; it defeats the purpose of the notice; and running and telling a person who @ rights is STILL NOT your decision. Ka-peesh? Good boy. 97.102.160.62 +Your repeated emails Despite my earlier request you have persisted in emailing me about this matter. If you wish to contest the block follow the procedure in the block notice above. Matters such as this must be discussed in full view of the Wikipedia community and not in private emails. +":::Cool, thanks for the research. I've added the tag back, though somebody should probably rewrite the intro to clarify things. Something along the lines of ""Eugenics is a social philosophy that ... blah blah ... and has in the past been presented as a legitimate science by supporters."" I'll leave that task to the next person who finds the categorization confusing, unless I get to it first. ) " +" Isle of Man as part of UK? Hi Wesley Mouse. On you user page, under ""Wesley's global tour"", why do you list Isle of Man under United Kingdom? - " +I'M A FUCKING RETARD AND MY NAME IS ARSEHOLE +A tag has been placed on Anthony santamaria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Anthony santamaria is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Anthony santamaria. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. +" Other sources confirm the NE articles on the matter. Olle Engstrand (a professor of phonetics at Stockholm University), ""Fonetikens grunder"" (""The basics of phonetics""), 2004, page 120 (my translation): All languages have more or less significant regional variations in pronunciation. In Swedish there are differences in the spoken varieties of the standard language (""Scanian"", ""Gutnish"" or ""Dalecarlian"") as well as variations specific to certain cities [""stadsmål""] like ""Stockholmska"" or ""Göteborska"". By ""dialect"" Swedish dialectologists are refering to those local dialects [""bygdemål"", ""landsmål""] that have a straight lineage that can be traced back to Old Norse, a history shared with all other Scandinavian dialects - these form a continuum while the distinct ""national languages"" like Swedish, Danish and Norweigan are relativly recent constructions. This is confirmed by Claes-Christian Elert (professor of phonetics at Umeå University 1969-1988) in ""Allmän och svensk fonetik"" (""General and Swedish phonetics"") on pages 34-35. Here are some selected passages (again my translation): For a long time there has existed speech varieties within the Swedish language area which are used only in certain communities and which have only been slightly influenced by the spoken varieties of central Sweden or by the written language. These are the genuine dialects [the bold font is in the book]. [...] The variety of language that a visitor to a community encounters most of the time is not the genuine dialect but a reginal speech variety [again Elert's bolding]. Sometimes the standard language is spoken with regional influences. Contrary to the genuine dialects, the regional varieties are almost identical to the central standard language [""det centrala riksspråket""] in terms of inflection and syntax. Vocabulary is usually also more or less identical, though some local deviations do exist. It is above all the pronunciation of vowels and consonants as well as prosody of the regional variations that deviate from the standard language. Generally these are similar to the genuine dialects within the same region. The regional standard varieties do not differ as much from one community to another as the genuine dialects. If you interpret these quotes very generously (that is, not according to what the writers intended), you might be able to support SIL's claims, though not the figures. The claims that Scanian as a regional variety is a seperate language is supported only by Lång and a handful of Scanian regionalists who use completely bogus arguments and often claim the name should be skåneländska (roughly ""Terra Scanian""). That it would be a dialect of only Danish is also extremely speculative, and it should at the very least be classified as simply ""East Scandinavian"". For all practical purposes it is most likely a lot more easily understood by Swedes than Danes. 14:39, May 5, 2005 (UTC)" +stop trying to prank me +"Yeah I know it must be shitty having the finger pointed you is. Especially on the talk page like that. I am not saying it is your fault but something similar did happen. You made a quick series of edits that cascaded into edit wars over a few different aspects. I honestly don't recall what they were. You only did some minor reverting but your edits were the catalyst. I actually started a talk page seciton on it title ""Romac's recent edits"" or something but deleted it within minutes because Sean or someone else had already started a discussion on it. I'll try to find it just so you can see my example. Again, it was not your fault but these are potentially similar circumstances. " +Also, I should get a clue about 7-1-1 (it's important) and the Peavey-Haglin Experimental Concrete Grain Elevator (it's unimportant and nobody cares). (Elkspeak) +, not the motorcycle, not their enthusiasm +Requested move back to Jeanette (singer) Somebody moved this page to Janette without an E because her legal first name is spelled Janette. While this is her legal name, her stage name that she is most commonly known by is Jeanette with an E, therefore the page should be moved back (I was unable to move it back due to it having been turned into a redirect page.) +Hi Hi Ganesh Wikipedia:WikiProject India/New articles is not working for last several days. Can you please arrange to fix the problem if any. Thanks +| action1result = listed | action1oldid = 518034284 | currentstatus = GA +Recent edits to the Omega Point (Tipler) article TFOWR, I would appreciate it if you could offer your opinion and/or assistance regarding the matter discussed at Talk:Omega_Point_(Tipler)#Disruptive_editing_by_Tim_Shuba. +of divine revelation +Editing Hi there, Frecklefoot. I've been reading your wiki pages and discussion and wondered if you might be interested in serving as a technical editor for an upcoming book on the greatest games ever made (to be published by Focal Press). I'm the author of Dungeons & Desktops and my co-author Bill Loguidice has published a multitude of articles on Armchair Arcade and Gamasutra. The pay would be $500. Please let me know if you are interested; prefer email at mattbarton.exe at gmail.com. +" WRONG DATA in this article all Perry's albums sales is not more than 13-14 millions. so why is in the article ""best-selling artists of all time"" written that she sold 63 millions albums?? IT CAN'T BE TRUTH. she sold about 13-14 million albums. not as ""best-selling artists of all time"" article that claim: a. she sold 60+ million (!). b. MORE Than Prince and almost as GUNS N ROSES (!!!!) It's not truth FOR SURE. Please Fix it (i don't have an account in wiki). thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.117.143.24 You are confused. List of best-selling music artists list total record sales of 63 million. This article shows total album sales of ~14 million. - Record sales = albums + singles + other songs. '''' " +Picking on opinions you do not like is obscene I followed the discussion. The proposal to userfy all userboxes did not succeed, and in the meantime there is nothing ruling out political userboxes, not to speak of deleting them from the user space. Singling out someone you do not agree with like NicholasTurnbull does is just obscene, and as long as you do not delete all the userboxes - which I would be perfectly ok with - stop picking on mine. +Test card F music Ceefax music isn't the same music as what we heard in trade test transmissions as that music dates back to 1997/8 to date and the Test card F music from the 60s - 80's era is long gone, though forgive me if this is incorrect +, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Sehend and Babakkhorramdin currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. This has nothing to do with the merits of the dispute, it has to do with cooperative editing. Dear Thanks for your message. I didn't start editing war. started it by forcing Persian script to Azeris. even we accept persian script, He added a word that is not grammatically correct in Azeri with Persian script. to solve it i added west Azerbaijan translation in Azeri in both Latin and persian scripts. i don't know why he thinks we should follow his idea to use Fazeri (a fake language which uses completely Persian words with one azeri verb at the end). For instance in Azeri similar to English adjective comes first followed by a noun. But in Farsi noun comes first. wanted to force Perisan words for west( غربی )and Azerbaijan(آذربایجان) and suggests using غربی آذربایجان. hence, we don't use غ as the first word in Azeri. 22:35 +List of important publications in anthropology Hi Schrauwers, it has been requested by that List of important publications in anthropology be moved to Bibliography of anthropology. Your comments on this request are most welcome. Please see Talk:List of important publications in anthropology#Requested move. And thanks again for your work on Economic anthropology. Would you be interested in adding a section on economic anthropology as part of the list of important publications in anthropology? +In re: Sockpuppets Mamawrites: JCarriker & Redwolf24 are not sockpuppets. While I don't know JCarriker as well, I do know Redwolf24 very well, and have for several months; I assure you, he is not a sockpuppet. He's a highschooler from Washington State. · Talk +Image I found another image on the site with Lexi as Kristina and i saved it and re-uploaded it on the current image [as a new version of the image]. +You are contradicting yourself: It can be inferred from your statements that you consent to having all references to human beings removed from the Planetary Habitability Article. 24.77.204.120 +" name origin disappointing ;) Okay so the article mentions the *real* story behind the name. Kinda boring, really. Considering I thought it was due to a line from the ""Three Stooges"" ""we need quiet, not a riot"". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Haters#Quotes 199.214.26.41 " +==Mark Howard (producer) hi. i am adding these links , like ones to intervies with Bob Dylan which talk about Mark Howard as a reference because my page states there is not enough references. is this wrong? i totally understand the book one but the others? can they be returned? would love your feedback. thankyouCharliedylan (talk) +Then what the Hell do you call what Bryan did Friday night? Good grief, are you guys that dense not to understand what he announced in that promo? Or is it simply that you don't want a 192-pound Vegan with no personality and miles of wrestling experience on the Wrestlemania XXVIII card, or even in WWE when Mania XXVIII occurs? +" The idea that one can distinguish the 'thesis' and 'theory' of intelligent design is puzzling. While I don't have access to Jones' Encyclopedia of Religion, there's an entry from 2003 (listed as 'forthcoming') on Dembski's list of writings on ID. Note that this is pre-Kitzmiller, and is typical of Dembski's writings of the time - Sagan, Paley and Kant. Assuming that this is substantially similar to the final version, there's nothing about thesis vs. theory. Beyond this, John Carter appears to misunderstand the idea of ""theory"". There are I think perhaps several other areas of what might be called ""theoretical biology,"" such as parts of astrobiology, which also have a total lack of any hard evidence to indicate that they even have something real to study, in that case alien life. No. That's not what theoretical biology is. Take a look at the TOC of the Journal of Theoretical Biology. Or try Acta Biotheoretica. Or even check out the journal Astrobiology. Theory isn't about ""things that lack total evidence"". This entire section about 'thesis' vs. 'theory' of intelligent design appears to be based on both a misunderstanding of what Dembski was saying (pre-Kitzmiller, when he was predicting the overthrow of ""materialistic"" science and a department of ID at a major university within a decade) and a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference of what constitutes theoretical biology, and how it differs from unfounded speculation and science fiction. " +"No done}} I removed this for a moment. On more careful reading, the source does say ""Russian-made"" and the content in the article clearly qualifies that the information is on behalf of the Ukrainian position. Speculation on our behalves contravenes Wikipedia policy (WP:OR). Nevertheless, thanks" +REDIRECT Talk:Worcester cold storage and warehouse fire +" I agree the captions should be limited to the name as long as the text of why they are relevant is ""next"" to the image in the body of the article. One less area for edit conflicts/warring. (t) " +Don't revert my Stoufville edits You're an idiot, stop. +Protection I've temporarily protected your user page. Hopefully this is enough to alleviate the vandalism problem. After a short while, I'll unprotect the page. If at any time you want to have your page unprotected, let me know, and I will follow through with your request promptly. See you around the Wiki! +I agree that the article should avoid putting too much emphasis on any particular actor's portrayal of the character. Austen's Darcy is a standout. So far none of the Hollywood portrayals have depicted him in all his brilliancy as the author painted him. +In fact, there appears to be only one article about a single lawsuit (maybe multiple filings), and 6 links to other court cases. This is simply original research and all court cases should be removed. +" My question is: what does this have to do with improving this article? Nothing, as far as I can tell. -The'FortyFive' " +Arrogance OK BigDunc you are an arrogant twit. Thats why you must go to the user page of Fabawanga, and perhaps then your eyes will be opened to what a burk you truly are. +Hello, Swapnilwakale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I notice that one of the first articles you created was Swapnil wakale, which appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally. The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Contributing to Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!    talk +" Hi. Youve locked my user page for almost a week now, without even telling me. Im not sure why. You removed the ""personal attacks"" ayway. So why block my own user page? " +" From an NPOV position, I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you - I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions - " +User:Chemist3456 On User talk:Chemist3456 I noticed you blocked him, can you contact a checkuser to get his identity? Thanks! Talk to me? +" Pre-Indo-European? I will edit statement identifying Hittite and Egyptian as Pre-Indo-European languages. Consensus places Hittite in the Indo-European family without any ""pre"", and Egyptian belongs to the Afro-Asiatic family. If Wittman proposed alternate hypotheses that should have been made clear in the article. " +"::::This should tell you what you need to know. I believe the first time I said ""this is a waste of our time"" was back in February of 2009. " +" I am going to have to report you to the administrators for your continued defiance of consensus guidelines. ChatMe!ReadMe!! " +" Copyright problem: Badaga Hattis Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Badaga Hattis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://badaga.wordpress.com/badaga-villages-nakku-betta-hattis/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Badaga Hattis and send an email with confirmation of permission to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Badaga Hattis, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ""under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Badaga Hattis with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Badaga Hattis. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions. It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Badaga Hattis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! " +- - Fine, thanks for the response. Its interesting that I had previously come across her name as an attendee from another web source but hadn't retained the reference. The author of the newspaper article quoted seemed quite knowledgable in the area, given the overall detail and content. It needs to be pinned down definitively. +you sound an utterly nasty bully you are not a cat you are petty hitler as simple as that, you have banned from eding live in real world hopw is banning me going to make me calm down you little hitler bully, i will find out who you are and see if i can get you on any petty law infringements and then how you like the little hitler treatment. you bully. +Apologise David, I stopped by to let you know - I'd assumed you'd seen the post on the arb case proposed decision talk, or village pump. Regards +RACIST FAGGOTS THAT MODERATE WIKIPEDIA ARE GOING TO MEET THEIR MAKER +Whats the matter bitch? You don't like to suck cock?? +" It's not uncivil to state the truth in an edit summary. Your edit summary claiming some kind of ""discussion"" on the Talk page was misleading at best, since you were the only participant in that ""discussion"". And your hostility towards the subject of the article is obvious. There is POV(everyone has one) and there is delusion. Thanks. " +Also, could you please fixup the section you've incompetently restored? +Superb effort Hey super effort Atlant! in creating this article in such a short time after the initial enquiry.(and whoever drew the diagram)found. This is just the sort of response we need in areas where we found are lacking. Well done! +The 'Church' of Scientology is hardly a 'Church' at all. Direct or Indirect oppression against those who disagree with the church, or publicly speak out against their practices and beliefs is (Not sure about most countries but i'm sure it is in Aus.) illegal. HOWEVER, it is not wikipedia's job to refuse an article to a cult, There is insufficent references, and third party information regarding the church of scientology's article. All of it's sources are from either it's own publications, or publications by it's members and affilate orginiazations. Either Deletion or some other form of action should be taken on this article. The article is full of lies, half truths, self promotion and defamation of the group anonymous. (Last i checked Wiki articles were supposed to be netural.) +" Merge proposal The Snooker Loopy article is very much of its time and unlikely to expand, and indeed, unlikely to be searched for. My impression is that it is only ever going to be searched for (a) as a Chas and Dave song or (b) as the theme song for the TV programme. I suggest that Snooker Loopy be made a redirect here, where the content can at least expand this article into something more useful, and a wikilink be added to the program itself (assuming it has an article; I haven't looked yet). andemu " +Having looked this article over, it seems to meet Wikipedia standards and I see no reason, whatsoever, to delete it. The topic may offend some readers but that is the nature of almost any article on human sexuality. +Oh Fuck you... Keep goin' ahead... +I reverted this edit too since it was unsourced but then again, that whole para looks unsourced. Anyway, best wishes to you too. - +Grossman If I thought communication would work, I would do it. So you would pretty much have me attempt to get into a conversation with an infrequent user about the fact that a) his behavior shows he doesn't understand policy; or b) that I think his account's been compromised? If I thought that I was going to get a positive or truthful response to either of those items, I would, but given the nature of the attitude shown in the AfD (which was the last real major burst of activity), I think I would get a negative response to the former item, and a non-truthful response if the latter. Even assuming I get a response at all, this user logs in very infrequently, and has never used his talk page. So, in all seriousness, how does communication on my part help the matter, exactly? Anybody looking at the contribs is going to see that he hasn't responded to anything before in years, so why would he start now? One doesn't AGF someone just because. +" Your imagining an attitude just because I disagree with you. Please assume good faith. You're free to warn me, but beware of the boomerang. ✉ " +I am demanding to speak to someone of the highest authority, anyone who has a proper look at this history will see that I tried to solve the matter via discussion, gave in to the other editor on other things, the other editor has been personal attacking, page owning, edit warring, not assuming good faith and yet he has not been blocked speak to Ritchie333 he is an editor who has been trying to solve the problem out all day and he will tell you fairly, he has the right to comment as he was involved from an outside point of view. +Hi, Benne. Thank you for unearthing this need for disambiguation. I think that Mansura is usually spelled with a ta marbuta as its final letter: منصورة (manṣūrä). This comes frot the root نصر (naṣara) meaning 'help' or 'make victorious' (interestingly, in derived form II it means 'Christianize'). Therefore, منصور (manṣūr) means 'helped', 'supported', 'victorious'. The place name is the feminine version of this, perhaps representing the old accusative (with locative meaning). In Arabic, many place names begin with the definite article. Sometimes the article is kept in trasliteration and sometimes it isn't. Sometimes it's transliterated as Al and sometimes it's El. The word itself could be transliterated as Mansura, Mansoura, Mansoora, Mansurah, Mansourah, Mansoorah, Mansureh, Mansoureh, Mansooreh. It would make sense to have all of these alternatives, with and without alternatives of definite article, linking to a disambiguation page. However, the Egyptian Mansurah is by far the most important of these, so it might take precedence over the disambig. I'll see if I can tidy it up a little. — +Is it not possible to accept that the merge argument was lost. Oppose them and now. Too soon for another discussion. Stop wasting valuable energy and be constructive. +I've raised the matter to the administrators. It's up to them to decide in this case. You have been flamebaiting and I have no time or desire for it. +Thank you for wearing mesh underwear to bed last night You were amazing. +Seems official enough, but probably best to wait for official BBC announcement. They're making The Cell 2? Dear God... +" Kingdom of Great Britain ""Kingdom of Great Britain""? Where did this term originate? I'll wager it didn't originate in Great Britain! Please supply evidential support or rename it ""Great Britain""." +Also, why are these two individuals listed at the top of the government section in the North Korea infobox if deceased individuals cannot lead government? +loves the caulk, she does +" I'm BUMED !!!!!!!!!!! Danny, I'M PISSED, that your NOT on Adam Crolla show any longer. I feel that the ""AC show"" is slipping away now that your gone! Will we be seeing/hearing from you anytime soon? Hang in there Bud...teddy tmieske@gmail.com If you know someone that can use PC help, checkout my two sites out: http://techurls.tripod.com/ < for PC Help http://elecurls.tripod.com/ < for wan'na-bee Hobbyist or Engineers This site is somewhat new, so few links; but I have hundreds of links to add... I live in Fairfield, CA (45 miles from Sac., CA) l8r -teddy" +" Career The reference provided for the first sentence does not actually make any mention of anything in this sentence at all. All that I can find on this page to do with Odubade is that he left in 2004–05. Another mention of ""netted"" without explanation (see comment in Lead section). Reference 8: ""Reserves too good for The Gas"" redirects to a general mobile news page which makes no mention of anything to do with Odubade. ""He scored his last goal of the season in Eastbourne's 3–0 away win against Cambridge City in the play-off, but was also in the side that lost 2–1 to Altrincham in the final."" – the ""but"" in this sentence doesn't make much sense. Maybe consider changing to an 'and', and remove 'also': ""..play-off, and was in the side.."" ""Despite scoring three goals in the club's first five matches of the season, Odubade failed to score again until November 2005.."" – this isn't really a correct usage of 'despite', you could probably use 'after' – ""After scoring three.."" Done up to Oxford United (note more for me than you!) '''''' talk " +vermontville is not very well known- how can people know it has four main streets? espec outside of michigan. +" Then all is well. Just don't forget ""Jones"", when you abandon ship. " +hi if you know clown will kill me guy then tell him that he is stupid, ugly, fat, gay, his mother's a whore, he smells like shit, he's an asshole, a bastard, and his little name just might be the gayest fucking thing i have ever heard. Hey and you are a faggot as well, so don't ever send me a message while i am editing pages again or i will rape your mother and kill you. +The section does seem to be biased towards negative information, but I don't think there's anything in there that shouldn't be. All of it is relevant, notable and accurate as to the US health situation, as far as I can tell. What I think it could do better is illuminate the leading role America has in many health fields, pharmaceuticals and so on. I disagree entirely that other countries shouldn't be compared - raw data means nothing without a point to compare it with, and it is silly to compare the US to third world countries with third world health systems (I'm not sure why you threw the UK in there, indeed a comparison to Western Europe is made and adding further data comparing the healths of the two countries wouldn't be that flattering to the US, in my opinion). +"::: I have tried to proceed in a reasonable manner. Clearly you are not reading my post. Did I or did I not state that these are definitions from a Classical Chinese dictionary? Have you bothered to look this character up in a proper Chinese dictionary? You think the omission of ""being unsettled"" is intentional do you? I feel unable to continue a reasoned discussion when faced with such an attitude. ""Uneducated?"" ""argumentum ad ignorantiam""? Perhaps you need to read up on what argument from ignorance actually means. You also don't seem to appreciate the verifiability issue relating to ancient Chinese pronunciations. But you seem to simply refuse to appreciate any point that I raise. So I shall stop trying. Good day. (Talk) " +After starting to clean up the page, I came to realize that there is a whole paragraph that could be removed. An uncited paragraph stating that the royal family donated relief funds to victims of Hurricane Katrina and the Asian tsunami seems faulty due to lack of citations and contradictory information on the web(most media sources quote the kuwaiti government made such donations). I would appreciate people's opinions on the matter. - +" I have understood that what I did was inappropriate for this site, and confirm that I won't do it again. I was also unaware of the many policies on Wikipedia, of which one was "" legal threat"". I was however not given any chance to repent despite my many explanations and promises to reform, which were neglected. I was cynically blocked by administrator who chose to show no consideration for my arguments in combination with his lack of theoretical understanding of the dispute, in effect labeling some valid arguments as ""politically inflamed"". In addition, he seems to find it reasonable to motivate his totalitarian actions due to editing I may have done 3 years ago, despite any such activity being ruled insignificant by other administrators concerned with supposed sock-puppetry. I am deeply disturbed by the lack of objectiveness by and call for at least two additional, unrelated, administrators to review the block. I affirm that I have no current, or future, plans of legal actions but only to present the accredited sources which I am underway of collecting. Any previous rhetoric will not be repeated, as I have already assured. " +" Content issues There are emerging guidelines within the Indigenous peoples WikiProject that I have begun to apply across the board for BC First Nations. The main one is that there are different types of articles, even when their content and location/people may seem to overlap (I'll sign each section/paragraph so comments on specific points can be made easily: ""Ethno & Culture"" articles Not as loose as it sounds, despite having to describe it like this: ""ethno/history/culture/peoples"" which this article, as titled, would fit into. These articles get Category:First Nations in British Columbia, with ""First Nation"" here meant in an ethnic sense, not in a governmental-org one. Ideally these will always be simply named, without ""Nation"" appended, as with Secwepemc and Nuu-chah-nulth - or Stó:lō (variable forms like Nuu-chah-nulth-aht can be redirects, although that term can include the Pacheedaht which normally wouldn't want to be called Nuu-chah-nulth). Government articles bands/First Nations, tribal councils, treaty groups) which have government-related content, ranging from chiefs and councillors, affiliations, treaty issues, modern demographics, economic and social issues, and so on These articles get Category:First Nations governments in British Columbia. In the case of the Stó:lō the main government article is going to be (created in a few minutes...): Stó:lō Nation, and will list all its subgovernments; ""Indian Band"" and ""First Nation"", sometimes just ""Nation"" are all interchangeable, although some bands seem to have a preference (at different times, given by variable content on various website sources); whatever is picked. Non-Indian Act-based governments can be and should described under different titles, either in the ethno type or in the history type (see below) language articles 'nuff said, but can be titled either in native language (St'at'imcets) or in the form Shuswap language; Wiki guidelines, it should be stressed, prefer the latter (use English, which is the language of the encyclopedia...). Some ethno and gov articles will have more than one language listed in their cats; some languages span more than one gov group, or in the case of the Sto:lo and Chehalis, two different ones. Cats for this are specialized in the linguistics hierarchy (examples later), but they should generally all take the relevant nation-category if there is one Category:Secwepemc, Category:Stó:lō, Category:Syilx etc. Community/Reserve articles Communities, reserves/IRs, towns that have significant native presence also; there is a difference, note, between the physical object of a reserve, and the band government that runs it; the descrption of the reserve is here, that of the government; even though this will not just overlap with the government articles but also the ethno/peoples ones; just interlink everything and it will sort of make sense; it's just a question of what was being searched for; the Scw'exmx and Spaxomin bands are all listed under Nicola Tribal Association, for instance; but the latter article is about the association, not about the communities; similarly, Shackan and Nooaitch are communities as well as reserves, but articles about them should focus on the community's particular history, not on overall Scw'exmx culture. In the case of the Sto:lo, there is another issue of ""where to fit the Chehalis"" as they are in the same cultural/language area, but they are not Sto:lo by organization or by their own appellation. Or the Tsleil-wau-tuth who are culturally Skxwxu7mesh but are part of the Sto:lo Nation (or were, last time I looked); so there's some confusing bits here and there. ""Mythology"" articles User:OldManRivers has pointed out the ""mythology"" articles and the cats that go with them; awkward wording/titling but in the absence of anything more workable, that's all there is for now. History/Biography articles there is another sort-of category for specific history articles, e.g. Chilcotin War, Fraser Canyon War and various bio articles (Simon Gunanoot, Slumach, Klattasine etc.) where Category:First Nations history would be appropriate as well as either Category:First Nations leaders or Category:First Nations persons; there's also different cats like Category:Conflicts in Canada which may apply, or Category:Wars involving indigenous peopels in North America, which was specifically titled to allow inter-native wars as well as wars between native peoples and non-natives; and without the ""Native American"" wording that that category at one time had +I'm so excited about the prospects for this sort of thing and I admire the boldness of Virgin Galactic as a commercial enterprise, but that's a little over the top for an encyclopedia. +" I added it back to the page and didn't remove the ""News Channel 11"" one until it becomes a little clearer which is used. I don't think it will hurt to have both on there. Thanks for your help. - • Talk • " +" Unfortunatly, that code takes away the purpose of assigning columns a width... so that the cells in the columns below have the same width. I know following your code I could just add colspan=# width=#% to each cell, but that would be cumbersome. Basically, I'd like it to be like this: a b c d e f g h i k l m And as you can see in the code: {| border =1; width=""100%"" |- | width=""10%"" | a | width=""30%"" | b | width=""60%"" | c |- |} {| border =1; width=""100%"" | width=""30%"" | d | width=""20%"" | e | width=""50%"" | f |- | g | h | i |- | k | l | m |- |} g, h, i, k, l, m, don't need to be assigned any width or anything.... they just take on the width of the leading row: d, e, f. Now, using your code, I would get: a b c d e f g h i k l m Of course, I could add the ""colpan=# width=#%"" to each cell to get: a b c d e f g h i k l m (Which is the appearance I want) But, I don't want to have to add the ""colpan=# width=#%"" to each cell once I already have a leading row that has that. Sorry, if I appear to be extremely picky. " +" A slightly nasty side comment: it is a common idea, outside mathematical and computer science cultures, that exact math is superfluous, and a hindrance to true understanding. Having math and CompSci, I reject this for the reason: understanding requires full logic down to a mechanical level – irrespective of the background of the pupil. Exact math is the sole way to succeed (but it's not a complete prerequisit, of course). Said: Rursus " +" Wikilove... what a crock Ben consisdering you and your friend have such a obsession for Joe hazelton that you even accused Wikidoma of being me ... just because your point of view on the education section was totally wrong. Your a clown, among Clowns, BEN (David). You discredit yourself with you own blind hatred of me and republicans like me. In looking at the diffs, its apparent you should not be editing on any political article, simply, because any one who disagrees with you is a ""JOE HAZELTON"" puppet irrespective of who they really are. Proof is in black and white in the diffs above. Also, the same goes for MR. (Scott) and his hate fill crap like this And this there is not a clearer case where there is a violation of WP:COI WP:NPOV WP:CIVIL that can be stated. Now what you going to do about ROB, Make no mistake now, My war is not on article editing and the like, because friends of mine, with better temperament and skill are now protecting my friends, but with WIKIPEIDA, and YOU and I WILL do what I can to diminish and marginalize wikipedia to a point of collapse, because of the abuse of power by those like you ROB and others LIKE you and perverting the idea of Wikipedia as being a Encyclopedia. I hate what you are - liars, and thief's of peoples works and reputations and vandals of ideas of civilization and civility. You and those on wikipeida, like you do violence to those ideas of fairness, and natural law, and the laws of logic. YOU are evil and full of hate. IT'S THAT SIMPLE.. Now laugh and chuckle, but you in you smugness, have push and antagonized me to a point I will never let go now and I have started compiling record for submittable to IRS and to any one who wishes to contact me in good faith so that those hurt by wikipeida may know your names, so they can know where to serve you paper.... NOW ROB, go RANGE BAN all of the MIDWEST AT&T; IPs you will never get rid of me.76.224.19.21 " +" Coaches category No, I don't know, sorry. I had a look through the various WP pages on categorisation but couldn't find anything helpful. You don't want to split the article into individuals rather than family? ~ • talk • " +RE: Sasayama: I am Sasayama and I still have many accounts on here which you will never find. fuck ya. What type of undies did you say you wear? love ya long time! +Personally I believe that if a stamp has been created for someone then that should be mentioned in the article. However if there is enough content to create an article for it more than a stub then that would be good as well but there should still be a mention of it to some degree in the article. +Yet another identification request For this File:NoctuidWynaad.jpg from Wayanad, Kerala. +But the only one thing in your created image which I appreciate, that is the colours. Because the traditional colours of Islam is dark green, Hinduism is orange, Buddhism is golden and Christianity may be light blue, etc +Thank you Thank You for Punishing me as i know i crossed the limits .plz look at the history of Barelwi what mezzo mezzo has done he reverted my edits even undispured heading biasedly. It is his regular habit to Insert his Personal Views in that Article. he continued after it also . (t • c) +[ am a good friend of the guys at less than jake and was only playing around with the guys i promoise you will not vandilize any of there pages ever again} +I wrote this article for my blog +The above vote does not count unless it is signed. Anyway, what one might use to get to this article is immaterial to what the title, since that can all be handled with redirects. Where the title matters is in specifying to the reader the most common name used to refer to the subject of the article. +" This article was nominated for deletion on December 14, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here." +" I haven't seen any sources definitively define her as being a lobbyist currently. Nevertheless, the entire section ""Lobbyist at the White House"" implies that she was there representing corporate or client interests, and there is no evidence to support that. In stories about those visits, she isn't identified as a lobbyist or conducting business on behalf of paying clients. Wouldn't a reporter want to define her as a lobbyist when covering her visits? In fact one visit described on this page is wholly inaccurate, as it says she was present for a meeting that the source says she wasn't present for. If that's your basis for lobbying, it doesn't seem to hold up." +Good Faith? Yes, thanks for the reminder, I'm sure I've got a template in here somewhere... +:::That thread is probably more important than most of us here even realise. Every post made in that thread hit every nail squarely on the head. Even I with my famous talent for cynical prose couldn't have said it better. makes a valid point above. I don't think it will be possible to overturn the election, but it's what should be done. Even my anecdotal suggestion for an election system might have better results. One of the problems is getting a decent selection of nominees. Perhaps there should be a run up to the election where users can nominate and second candidates, then let the candidate decide if s/he wants to run in the election along with the self-noms +REDIRECT Talk:Early warning score +" It was just that I saw no grounds at all to hold the vote again; the reasoning why the move should have occured despite the vote result was quite clear, so per WP:IAR and WP:UCS... Ah, never mind. — (?) " +You can add information about yourself on your user page. +Stop archiving the on-going discussion on Stefan Banach You will need to stop archiving the on-going discussion of Stefan Banach. This discussion page is not large enough to justify archiving. You will not be allowed to censor the discussion by moving it into the archive. +Read you mother fucker or you shall fucking die you cocksucking prick You can go to hell you fucking cocksucker and now I shall go ahead and masturbate +"::::::Whatever, my policy is that I think that it needs to be edited then I will edit it. And I think that if someone wants to make a major edit then they need to come to this Talk page and explain themselves to me or I will edit it if it needs editingjust like you do all the time. Also, I don't if you know if you know that you did NOT spell ""hypocrisy."" Now, if this was the main article then I would edit your comments so that you could spell correctly.- 22:16, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) " +" Okay, media commentator and related matters. I repeat the text you suggested above:Ijaz has also served as a media commentator, frequently writing opinion pieces and appearing on television news programs over the past two decades. He was exclusively retained by Fox News in the period immediately following the September 11 attacks, appearing on Fox programs over 100 times. He was a popular guest on the network's Special Report broadcast.Do you have any source that states all of this, and/or a collection of sources that together state this? In this situation, we can't simply cite your opinion pieces, because no single opinion piece is good for ""frequently writing"", and taking a bunch of opinion pieces and saying ""see, it's frequently"" is the kind of thing addressed by our no-original-synthesis standard. ""Appearing on TV news..."" This is slightly different, since a few references to TV appearances over the years would establish that you weren't a one-time guest, but again a secondary source would help by demonstrating that TV appearances were significant. Although I know you're not a mediæval soldier, the retainer thing is a rather specific detail that really shouldn't appear unless we have a source for it — could you find something published by Fox, or something from somewhere else, noting that they'd officially retained you? As I noted above, I looked for sources of this sort but was unable to find them. Finally, about a Further reading section — do you know of any books that talk about you at length in a favorable light? I'd like to present the Al Franken book together with a similar work from the opposite perspective. " +HI! No I am sorrry to hear that. But who has wrote more articles on here me or you? Maybe nexxt time. +then how come he is allways refered to as a serial killer ? you ass hole +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hello!, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk " +, please go back in time like a year and show your past self this edit. Please make sure he stays calm. ;) +" ""Shin Generation"" Stop using this. Translate the whole term.— (琉竜) " +Uyghur help What is the Uyghur at the top of http://www.ylsy.edu.cn/? It is for yili Normal University Thanks +First of all, let me tell you that i am not so free to reply you in 1000 words as you did. It seems like you have forgot what wikipedia is a community based project, it's not your personal property. If you are so much dedicated to remove my edits, then prove that what i deleted was wrong. Give me the reference for EACH entry what you are unediting from past 3 days. There is no place of bullying in wikipedia. I you think that you are right then prove it over here. +" Template:Portuguese overseas empire Hi,Indon I think you did wrong by removing the template. I think it gives an important historic context. That's not excessive, it´s complet. And doesn't seems to me that anyone will think that the islands belong to Portugal. Did you really got that impression? Have you checked on how many articles of sovereign countries that template and category are? And sometimes with even more related categories and templates. For example, i don't think anyone will stay with the impression that Brazil is still part of Portugal. OK... Be cool. " +Hi Hi muthafuckaa How are you man? Just wanted to wish you a very happy new year 2013. +Theres nothing wrong with my edits other than the one on the Iran article, but I will stop the personal attacks. +" According to the C99 standard, a string need not be stored in an array at all. Consider char foo = '\0';. Removing the word 'usually' causes the statement on wikipedia to directly contradict the C standard. Please remove the footnote links if you're going to do that, and rename the page to ""C strings stored within arrays"", or something." +Be that as it may, you're deleting pertinent, nPOV information willy-nilly. +User Ip 195.8.175.27 you are a motherfucking pervert if u vandalize anything again with references to sexuality and genitals I'm going to cut your penis off. +I don't know the extent of the EU. Is all of the French Republic part of the EU (CFP franc)? I know that Gibraltar is part of the UK, but I don't think any other British territories are. I agree with the collapsed list idea, possibly formatted as: Any idea what other currencies there are?  (talk | contribs) +You two are something else. You just gave your total bias. You two have no business editing this page considering your obvious POV. ... +Me My favorite Wikipedian is Chetblong. He is the only one to welcome me and forgive, not just block me +114 citations or 11,400 citations. when entire paragraphs (and some entire sections) are without attribution, there is a deficiency in citations. 96.232.126.111 +Hehe, it's probably my accent and the way my mind works - I'm pronouncing the two words the same and hear them in my head - so considered them mispellings rather than different names. With your redirect I think we need to disambig link them all... Just going to look em all over +Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Here are a few links you might find helpful: Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off. Learn from others Play nicely with others Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! Tell us about you You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We're so glad you're here! Talk +"=Semana 7=== Orden de llamada Couple Score Dance Music ResultCristian & YanílLindy Hop""Rock Around the Clock""—Little RichardCarmen & FernandoFlamenco""Malagueña""—Brian Setzer OrchestraVerónica & Juan LeandroDanza Clásica""Romeo and Juliet—""TchaikovskyNicolás & JudithDance Latino""Más""—Ricky MartinFlavio & SoledadTahitiano""Hi'o O Mai""—Les Grands Ballets de TahitiLuli & AlejandroMúsica Disco""Hot Stuff""—Donna SummerWanda & CristianMerengue""Suavemente""—Juan Luis GuerraFacundo & RominaHustle""Rock My Baby""—George McRaeLisa & Juan PabloPop""Womanizer""—Britney SpearsLuisana & HernanContemporáneo""Gravity""—Sara Bareilles ==" +" The sections that you added were copied verbatim from http://www.dawn.com/2003/09/21/fea.htm . That's a copyright violation (in addition to being simple plagiarism). I don't know what you mean about ""the relevance of it with the link you posted"". Are you referring to the link to WP:copyvio? " +" Stop harassing me iam being serious this is very annoying that you are accusing me. It's truly hard to believe that you'd actually call the boy nammed Brandon a ""friend"" after what i am seeing from here. You sir,must understand that treating people that you just met on the internet like how you are treating mee is just plain rude. " +" Unfounded comments? Griffin is by common consent a white supremacist and an expert self promoter. I admit his mum probably didn't write his article though. I'm reverting you, of course - I have no choice after you have said what you have just said - your obvious bias must be fought. And peer reviews do NOT mean an article cannot be improved. They don't rubber stamp anything, far from it. You now have replaced the totally un-referenced line ""Since he became the leader of the BNP several educational institutions have invited him to speak on political radicalism, multiculturalism, and BNP policy."" I am sure that line did not pass the peer review, so don't be so select. " +" Thanks for the review. ) (Hit Nearly there, if you could just answer the one last little query about Frank's mother & father above...Freak " +" Possible copyvio, but no big deal. I just read a long review by a university professor or student and recognized several phrases. We should probably give credit for these. I'll try to google it up again. Review of 1984 version Here is a copyrighted review or summary: In 1984, the movie The Bounty starring Anthony Hopkins as Bligh and Mel Gibson as Christian was released. The movie is set during the trial of Lt. William Bligh upon arriving home after the mutiny had occurred. In this movie, the events of the voyage up to and after the mutiny are shown as a series of flashbacks. Bligh is not so much portrayed as a cruel tyrant in this film, but rather as a traditional ship's captain - a man of his times. While some savage beatings were carried out under Bligh's watch in this film, it seems to be in this film no different than any other captain would have done. The crew is shown in a different light than in the previous two films. They are shown to be a much more ""rough and tumble"" group than the crews in the other films. Many of them are shown as typical sailors of the time. Their motivations in this film are not always as noble as in the other two films. In this film, Fletcher Christian is a more complex character. He is shown at first as a friend of Bligh. At first Bligh thinks so much of Christian that he asks the man to sail with him for a second time. However over the course of the film both men turn against each other. The feelings become much more acrimonius after the ship leaves Tahiti after Fletcher has been forced to leave his wife behind on Tahiti. In this film, she is more of a reason that Fletcher mutinied than in the previous two films. Afterwards, Fletcher is shown as feeling remorseful because of the mutiny. He tells another mutineer that he wished he had given Bligh some muskets. In this film, the crew is shown as having more responsibility than they did in other films. This film does not so much hold Bligh as responsible - rather it is the desire of some of the crew to go back to Tahiti. However, it does make the fact that Bligh was going to try circumnavigation as one of the reasons that some of the crew decided to mutiny. Like the 1935 film, this version also concentrates on the trials of Bligh and those who were forced into the launch with him. It is the only film to show that one man died because of an attack by the natives of an island where the launch stopped. Once Bligh's launch reaches a Dutch colony, his part in the story comes to an end. It shows the later voyages of the Bounty as they go to Pitcairn Island. It then goes to Bligh's trial where he is subsequently acquitted by the Admirality. The 1984 film was probably one of the more historically accurate of the films dealing with the Bounty. It shows both Bligh and the crew as more products of their time than anything else. This film also suggests that the motives behind the mutiny might not have been as noble as suggested in the other films. It also portrays the natives mostly nude as they would have appeared at the time of The Bounty's visit to the island (the previous films couldn't portray this because of censorship and decency concerns). Despite the distinguished cast—including Daniel Day-Lewis and Liam Neeson in supporting roles and Laurence Olivier in a cameo appearance as Admiral Hood—the film had a tepid critical reception (the capsule review in Newsday read in its entirety as follows: ""Man the bilge pumps"") and was not a great commercial success. " +The spelling of FLAK is the only correct spelling when used as an adjective of jacket. Obama was wrong. +You're a meme on 4chan's /b/ imageboard now! LOL +I would cite the references that I've made in bold freakin' text, but I can neither find nor be hassled to go through all the site's features to venture the references button, so I put the chapter number and quotes accordingly in the edit, giving you no excuse by any means to go about defiling through them all as though it were your life's passion. IF you find them so troubling, move the references (Ch. 260, for one) I made to the references section for crying out loud. Don't be undoing edits like some douche seeking to start edit wars with no authority, (take it from me) it makes you look like a cretin, honestly. +The controversy of the May 2007 issue is true, has references. Do not remove because of marketing issues, guys. +You are a little bastard, get a life and/or masturbate more often. 82.40.14.172 +" Saying ""impose neoliberal orthodoxy"" is typical communist talk, especially if you support Marxist-near editors like you do. " +" Bam. It's on.►''''''Holla! " +That's a good policy, and one I try to follow myself. +that this was a major or minor factor in the battle +Doesn't matter you are still using it for purposes of your own sinster gains. RFAR I suggest you visit WP:RFAR. +" My inquiry is friendly in a 'civility' sense. I am not personally challenging you, rather I am challenging you as a co-editor and collaborator. That is what I meant when I wrote: 'I challenge you to do this per WP:V'. WP:V ""...in a nutshell: Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."" Please do not perceive my challenge as personally threatening, it not intended so. Civil order at Wikipeidia exists between editors with different points of view, in large part, because we all agree to follow WP:POL. Could you therefore please answer my questions? Thanks. " +/b/ No time for the ol' in and out ma'am, I'm just here to read your meter. +Well, I can't do anything with it if I can't figure out how the automated editing works. (talk) +I can really care less whether you like the gtr or not, lol, just give a credible source to support your POV. thank you! +Dr Stephen I. Rosen EB has sent Mongo a photo taken eb of Rosen. xx +The supposition that Saint Peter's College attained Benjamin Da Costa's funds through an 'interesting legal argiment' are baseless. Benjamin Da Costa had many links with the Church of England. In his will he specifically requested that his estate in Adelaide was to be alloted to the Collegiate School Of Saint Peter. It was never the intention that Da Costa's assets were to be given to the Catholic Church. Many people presume that since Da Costa was of Spanish origin; he was to give his estate to the Catholic Church. 04:53, 28 September 2006 auhc +":: Sounds like you are possibly an AOL user. As the block template you added says ""If the block message says that your IP address is blocked or that your IP address was recently used by a blocked user, please paste the block message or post your IP address below as we have no way of unblocking you if your username itself was not blocked."". We need the full information to be able to look into this. (talk) " +Age You might want to reconsider advertising your age. Not many people are going to take seriously anything some 14-year-old, snot-nosed, wet-behind-the-ears punk kid has to say. +" I've had to dig around a lot to figure out what everything is with the new Wikia layout. Not entirely sure what the code would most likely be found in wikia:half-life:MediaWiki:Common.css. // talk // // " +WP:NURSE priority review As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to mid per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale. I have also upgraded the article to C class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Cheers, +":::::::Isn't it enough to cry about million refugees regardless of place and circumstances? Nagorno-Karabakh War, its reasons, parties, motives, etc. are not the place to discuss here. It is a large and controversial topic, where each of sides can bring thousands of counter-arguments. When and if those refugees come back and come to a new consensus regarding the town name, we can discuss it then here. Now there is no Azeri government there, no Azeri population. Even the Azeri dreams don't fly in the air. Though unrecognized de-jure, those people democratically elect their government and gradually build their civil society institutions (with better success than Azerbaijan, as I mentioned earlier). What you try to do is tying your dreams, sighs and regrets on Wikipedia readers who have the right to know real-life conditions and not being misled. ''' (talk) " +on this page, or an error may occur. +==Almost Famous== You are NOT and administrator, and therefore you have no right to restore anything on MY talk page. You have no RIGHT to WARN me. This is MY WARNING TO YOU! STAY THE FUCK AWAY! +Another troublemaker. Are you aware of this guy? 08:55 21 March 2006 (UTC) +" Removal of ""united"" ""city"" Rovers"" etc So as to avoid the clogging as this list grows, I'm thinking these are not nicknames but part of the name of the club. I know some may object, eg many man u fans may think United is their nickname, but it isn't really, and certainly not more than any other ""United"". I'll remove them now, can easily be added back if anyone can think of a good reason why stating the bleedin obvious is necessary ;) " +so mote it be i see in the history of so mote it be that you have it changed back to redirect to the five whatever kiss. if i am doing this wrong and have the wrong person or whatever, ignore this message. i am currently studying Wicca. of what i have heard everywhere else (besides here), it has nothing to do with the five kiss thing. it is a phrase which lets our prayers to the goddess and god recognize our prayers and listen. but of course Wicca is a malleable religion. so a phrase which ends our prayers just might be related to some sexy blessing, i don't know +After some consideration, I have decided to de-nominate for speedy deletion and tag the article instead. Thanks, +This is now very concerning. I emailed Elonka last night about my scepticism as to the real identity of these posts. My suspicions arose when I received an email from (a) Lord Knowle to help edit the Knights Templar article. Looking back on it later it did seem diferent from the usual style that I would normally get from the person that I know who owns this account. I was very puzzled over the temperament and writing style of the edits on the Knights Templar page. The attacks on the Earl of Bradford seem very similar, someone who has also been attacked for their campaign against pseudo-Templar websites. LK is also very private about his involvement and doesn't participate on public forums on this subject. If he had wanted to do so, then he would have done so a lot earlier in the article's lifecycle than these last few weeks. Having spent a good few hours going through all his edits there is even one that was posted when I was speaking to him on his mobile. I have checked the date and time entry and on that day he was in Suffolk, over 200 miles away from his home. I would urgently request that LK's account is locked until this is checked out. I have emailed him and await his reposnse. +Glaring evidentiary deficiency not reported herein wrt George Zimmerman's account of events Recent photos of Zimmerman shortly after the shooting made by the police show no blood spatter on his front including his shirt. His account claims that Martin was directly over him when he shot him. Yet a 9mm hollow point wound in Martin's front chest would be expected to shower blood all over Zimmerman. This evidence clearly contradicts Zimmerman's account. Another report indicates that the shot was fired from more than 18 inches away. This contrary evidence and contradiction in Zimmerman's story should be noted in this wiki article. Speculation is that Zimmerman achieved standing (off the ground from a lying down position) status after Martin's struggled with him and then shot him with his 9mm as payback for the beating upon himself which he had apparently initiated. By leaving these facts out of the article it suggests that wiki authors are suspedning the laws of gravity and common sense. BTW, who locked the article down from further editing? The 'holier than thou'/'superior to the rest of us' wiki editor police? +" Not sure why Blofeld is posting here, but I was merely looking for your input as yourself and Nehrams had discussed a ""tag & assess drive"" on the coordinator's page. I hardly think it's something that requires a project-wide discussion, but I can make a more formalised proposal at WT:FILMC if you wish. " +" GAC review This article is off to a good start, but I see some problems with the sourcing, formatting and prose that concerns me. At this moment the article does not fulfill the GA criteria, but I'm willing to put the nomination on hold in order to allow contributors to work. Here are some suggestions/comments for improvement: The references are a mess. None of them are formatted properly and several of them (IMDb, scifipedia, hunkymalecelebs) are not from reliable sources. I suggest using citation templates in order to correctly format the links and look for replacement refs for those from disreputable sources. (habla conmigo) Two fansites are linked to in the external links. Per WP:EL, there should be none. Also remove the duplicate IMDb link to the awards and nominations page; this is redundant. :Image:Han2.jpg does not have a fair use rationale. The use of ""influential"" in the lead, although sourced, is open to debate. I would remove it entirely. More information needs to be given in order for the lead to adhere to WP:LEAD; there is no mention of his early life, music training, family, or cult following. Nil by Mouth shouldn't be mentioned by itself and more can be said about his film making, as well. and can be seen singing and playing piano in the 1988 movie Track 29, and tracing over pre-recorded versions of Beethoven's music in Immortal Beloved: Ref? Also remember to italicize the film name. The ""Music"" section is only one sentence long and no date is given. The biography should follow a chronological timeline. After graduating from drama school in 1979, Oldman spent almost eight years in theater, winning various awards: such as...? Ref? successfully using an American accent: what does ""successfully"" refer to? The accent itself? In October 2007, movie website TheShiznit.co.uk... how is this a notable website/accolade? Because of its length, I suggest breaking the ""Filmography"" list into two columns. Oldman also directed the music video for ""Red Rover"", a song from Jewish Rap Group Chutzpah's 2nd CD ""Hip Hop Fantasy,"": the first comma placement (outside of the quotation marks) is correct, the second isn't; there are several of these that need to be fixed throughout the article. I did not read the prose too closely, but once these issues have been taken care of, I'm willing to give it a second review. Until then, I'm going to put the nomination on hold. Please do let me know if you have any questions or comments. (habla conmigo) " +" {unblock| First Thank you for reviewing My first appeal, The reason I am asking to be unblocked is because I have yet to read any rule/suggestion that states or implies ""Giving any band user an Award constitutes vandalism"" and/or ""Creating a new talk page to revert a deleted talk page of a band user constitutes vandalism"". Furthermore, as I have stated on this page I do fully appreciate and ask for politely full explanations of what I did wrong so as not to make the same mistake twice. Since I obviously did not receive a full explanation I did not fully understand the Policy on said accusations of said specific vandalism. }}" +Virgin My only warning? You'll block me? Well f*ck off. You probably get off from warning people on Wikipedia, don't you? I bet you're still a virgin, f*cking homo. As for your warning, shove it up your ass. and F*CK YOU! +I agree with your statement that Christian mysticism is directed toward communion with God, a state of personal wholeness, but mysticism is widely acknowledged to be a non-ordinary experience. Without that part of the definition it loses its meaning. +No opinion on content, no. Did you review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution? Might want to file a request at WP:3O for a third opinion, or post an RfC. If you need help with syntax, let me know. onka +We need to have this open Are they afraid that this will get changed? Its a very small article on here for years, why is it still locked? I will bring this up with an admin since only certain people feel like they have to only put their own view on the subject, and this is coming from an African-American.184.98.143.25 +hawking died this morning from cnn +Well, if you just did what I think you did, you are in some deep trouble. I'm reporting you regardless because of recent behavior i have observed in regards to page editting. I tried to be nice. +" I asked you a question. We both know you have my page on your watch list, so are why are you playing games and making me formally ping you? Makin'Bacon " +Longest Lasting Computer Line? While t may not have been the best selling computer line, was not the 8-bit line, more specifically, the 400/800, the longest lasting computer line? most computer line usually have a span of %-7 years before being replaced. +This is the Dark Elves view; Malekith feels that he is the rightful heir. +Oops My apologies, I meant to leave a message for someone else. Sorry for the mix-up. |Parlez ici +faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots faggots +Blocked again You have been blocked for 48 hours for persistently uploading images without providing adequate or accurate source and copyright information. You've been blocked before for doing this, so I suggest you read closely: Wikipedia takes copyrights extremely seriously. As I have already requested, please read Wikipedia:Image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Image use policy and Help:Image page. Images uploaded to Wikipedia are deleted unless adequate source and copyright information is provided, and if you continue to ignore these messages you will be subject to a longer block. Thanks. +" '''A request has been made of the Mediation Cabal for mediation on this page. Please do not remove this notice until the issue is resolved. Preloaded case page " +0k thanks because even i didn't know whats the process.yes even i agree wikipedia is a place for providing accurate information.one more thing how do you make those images of tulu script or for that matter any script.do you write them down and click the photo or use some software.(i apologise if i am bothering you with too many questions) +Agree, also I am not clear why there is this supposed consensus against T. I support it, 272 does, JJL does. KD? +" The Jaron Lanier quote may belong in a criticism or media references section, but the fact that he has made an unsubstantiated assertion in a book critical of the article's subject doesn't go far to proving that this is any sort of motto. If this was a citation to a place where members of the movement whose motto this purported to be were making this assertion, that'd be a better citation. If you found a PETA brochure that stated ""'Killing animals is fun' is the unofficial motto of the meat-packing industry..."" it'd be about as credible as Lanier's quote. " +|Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy) +User:MARVEL is back Hi, MARVEL's back again under the name , he's also using profanities in his edit summaries. And he's back again under the names and . Hi again. is his latest sock who reverted Hatra to +Another issue I read from the previous set of edit summaries is that the map has modern borders. That's a bit harder to fix, as it would require a new orthographic projection from scratch, unless a similarly existing orthographic map exists. The only good one I can find, File:Japanese Empire (orthographic projection).svg, isn't centred on China (it's simple enough to delete the internal divisions in China, if that's desired). +I am an Arab from Syria and only what I can say is that Wikipadia is wrong with this article As an Arab and Muslim, I find out that this article is personal attack on one individual. This kind of practice is not welcome. Having read this article only what I can conclude is that all is wrong starting with notorious lies posted there and not only that. Editor/s of Wikipadia locked the article for editing????? What that means? +" I agree with both of the above comments, which I think point the direction for a real consensus. Anyone who shouts ""it needs no proof"", like Zereshk, could probably benefit from reading out core policies, WP:V and WP:NOR carefully. | Talk " +" Your ""indisputable facts"" aren;t. Wikipedia requires solid reliable sourcing, not what any editor asserts are ""ndisputable facts."" Kindly remove the Breivik material as I fear that the ""edit war"" is on your side. Cheers. " +Oh so it's you who wants the considerable amount of harm then is it? You fucking cretin. You seriously think I'm going to stop vandalising just because you block me? I have a MASSIVE range of IPs and you will never block them all. I am never going to stop either. Hahaha 94.2.133.200 +Please re-read what I have said rather than making assumptions, which is what you appear to be doing. As I have said, I am not objecting to the reference. I am questioning the wording of the text to which the reference is attached, and whether that wording actually matches what Louis is saying. Because in the context of the reference the meaning of the text is ambiguous. +fowler fowler its not about who knows more of history,its about a community and we cant ignore what others say,and dont think that whatever other people say is false,cause confidence is good but overconfidence is not good!and see if u are writing about a history of community then write about their present also!and include some modern sources,and be neutral!u havent included jatt idols like Bhagat singh,Udham singh!and Abhinav bindra a gold medalist at Olympics in shooting,Yuvraj singh indian crickter,Harbhajan singh crickter,and Milkha singh gold meadlist in 1958 and 1962 olympics in 200m and 400m! one more thing its written that jats used to practice widow remarriage but they used to practice only when it was allowed after reforms in the society and so what if they used to practice it afterall it was an evil practice,and let me tell u that even rajputs started practicing widow remarriage and rajputs and jats made their own rules cause they had power brahmins were only preists they had no actual power!cause kings and warriors have always more power than preiests! +I have checked on the legality of posting the kennedy compound photos. These can be posted. I do not know how to post photographs, so please do it. Also, please post other photos of the compound. +" Just shut up you boring old crap. Nobody even likes you. Also, WTF is all the damn ""copyright pics?"" WTF is that?? God, you really should get off the Internet & study you uneducated dufus. Anyway, it's hard to communicate with somebody as stupid as YOU. Also, why should I do what you want me to do? I can do whatever I want you big loser.User:Pic Business " +" When I first heard of ""coldplay,"" I thought it was the name of a sandwich, like come cold cut corn beef with rye. Imagine how shocked I am to learn that this cold sandwich consisting of castrated schoolboys is pretending to be a talented music group. lol Yet you bring a champion of cold cuts to dispute music with me? A champion of cold cuts is going to argue about Soviet Russia with me? Spare me this insult, please, and you know you brought this on yourself by throwing away my smart music edits of the past. " +" Turks of Turkey and Azeris did not ""gain more European appearance"", they simply ""melted"" and blended with locals and had no larger genetic impact, but linguistic. So nowadays, designation of Turkic would be more appropriate in this latter sense, i.e. to designate linguistic groups, ethinicity-wise it makes little senseSahib-qiron ." +" I'm afraid you didn't follow the instructions above. Follow the exact instructions posted by Woody, and then we will be able to unblock your IP. - " +" Please help me Tito Dutta I came on Wikipedia to make it a better encyclopedia and my work is near end. I may not be much active for the coming weeks and the coming month. My edit count per day is going to drop. I have worked day and night to reach my goal which is not far away. I am done. I may hardly sit on the net and log in here and remove vandalism and update soap opera articles. But when I will not be there what will happen? I am saying this as there is no one else who keep vandalism away from those articles. I am alone and if I will not be there it is gone. I have asked many users for help but in vain. I hope a yes from you. If you are interested in watching (watch listing) the following articles, track vandals and try to update them then please reply on my talk page. Don't make me sad and neither do it just for the sake of making me happy. The list of the articles is as follows (the list may be a little big) but only some of them are edited regularly): Samta (India) Kathgola Motijhil Jafarganj Cemetery Khushbagh Hazarduari Palace Chawk Masjid Fauti Masjid Nizamat Imambara Wasif Manzil Namak Haram Deorhi Madina Mosque Clock Tower of Murshidabad Madan Mohan Jiu Temple Metropolitan Building Sarat Chandra Kuthi Shobhabazar Rajbari Nashipur Rajbari Nashipur Akhara Tourism in West Bengal Tourist attractions in West Bengal Jahan Kosha Cannon Bachhawali Tope Mansur Ali Khan Mubarak Ali Khan (Nawab of Bengal) Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan Sahibzadi Shajar Ara Begum Sarat Chandra Samta Samata Metropolitan Building Motijheel (disambiguation) Chawk Mosque (disambiguation) Template:Tourist attractions in Kolkata Template:Tourist attractions in Murshidabad Category:Tourist attractions in Murshidabad Others are: Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad Murshid Quli Khan Sarfaraz Khan Shuja-ud-Din Muhammad Khan Alivardi Khan Siraj ud-Daulah Mir Jafar Mir Qasim Najimuddin Ali Khan Najabut Ali Khan Ashraf Ali Khan Baber Ali Khan Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan Ahmad Ali Khan Mubarak Ali Khan (Nawab of Bengal) Mansur Ali Khan Hassan Ali Mirza Wasif Ali Mirza Waris Ali Mirza Bade Achhe Lagte Hain Byaah Hamari Bahoo Ka Kya Huaa Tera Vaada Kuch Toh Log Kahenge Parvarrish – Kuchh Khattee Kuchh Meethi Saas Bina Sasural Indian Idol 6 Love Marriage Ya Arranged Marriage Shubh Vivah Dekha Ek Khwaab List of programs broadcast by Sony Entertainment Television (India) Places of interest in Kolkata I have also asked , and for the same. (২০১২) " +Thanks for the change - 'absence of technical knowledge/Michael Portillo's Bradshaw' or I would have done it myself. +I've disabled this request. Please establish consensus support for a specific edit and explain the specifics of the edit being requested. (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) +Manger's Don't forget to add the manager's for the matches: Ranjin Singh managed The Great Khali Santino Marella managed Beth Phoenix Layla managed Willam Regal Manu managed Cody Rhodes and Tony Atlas managed Mark Henry +Help! It says that the IP address 202.7.166.174 is blocked because of vandalism, but my address is 60.242.127.62, so why does Wikipedia think my IP address is 202.7.166.174? 60.242.127.62 60.242.127.62 +" Now that's a unique outcome. Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree that what I said is a blockable offense, I just wonder why when a different editor says the exact same phrase and someone complains, the complainant gets told to shut the fuck up and do something useful, and stop trying to be the civility police. Was I using the phrase in a different context? I'm not looking for an unblock, I'm just looking for a formal acknowledgement that there is a double standard. For more info, see Wikipedia:ANI#Malleus_Fatuorum_and_Cornellier this ANI thread and this AN thread. I'd appreciate a response. | verbalize _ " +How does it feel to be a stupid bitch who edits wikipedia? too bad nobody will ever love you +" Sending out now! -) ''' talk''' " +" I'd also like to add that I think the indefinite banning of Rookiee for ""pedophile trolling"" because he politely complained about the deletion of the article he contributed to, comes very close to being a bigoted slur against someone based on their professed sexual orientation. What's next, bans for ""Nigger Uppityness"" or ""Kike Craftiness?"" I've formed a very negative opinion of Jimbo and the whole Wikipedia project at this point. There isn't a single numbered principle on Jimbo's user page which you people don't regularly violate. This is definitely a case of an organization having an entirely different agenda than the propaganda it writes and disseminates about itself. " +Hey you cunt armchair lawyer Do you like it? Sitting in your mom's basement trying to act like you are know it all? Go fuck yourself you stupid cunt bag. +I do not feel that this is simple promotion of an entity. This wiki is informative for anyone interested in Stoller and his work. +" Third World Comments I also fail to see how his comments about third world countries belongs in the controversy / criticism section. Does anyone actually take issue with his claim that they have ""problems of poverty, disease, and corruption?"" He's basically saying that third world countries are...well...third world countries. Bin Laden / Ahmadinejad Comments Gibson isn't accusing Democrats of modeling themselves after Osama or Ahmadinejad, which I admit would be controversial if he did. He did just the opposite, in fact. He seems to be accusing the duo of modeling their pronouncements after standard talking points of the Democrats. This is a far cry from comparing Bush to Hitler, for instance. France / Hip Hop Culture and the School Shoooting His comment saying no one would care if France were nuked might be considered controversial, although it's proven not to be his ""nappy-headed ho's"" type career damaging statement. Every section in the criticism section has created NO RIPPLE outside of the highly partisan sections of the blogosphere, aside form his comments on the school shooting (which was mentioned in a small circulation hip-hop magazine). For the sake of comparission, I'd like to cite Chris Matthew's June 26th edition of ""Hardball"", where Ann Coulter was a guest. After saying he was ""deeply concerned"" about people who think like Coulter, many of the members in the live audience cheered. This caused Matthews to exclaim, ""My God, is this 'Deliverance'?"". I personally criticize Matthews for comparing people to inbred hillbilly homosexual rapists (and not giving them a chance to defend themselves). Yet, I'm not putting my criticism on Matthew's page. It's not significant enough to merit mention...just like nearly everything on Gibby's page. Anyone disagree?" +Your Opinion, Our View +lets end it now its over gt is watever you think it is period. good night guys. User:Big foot123456789 +I look forward to reading your re-write. Oh yes that quote is from the film Sneakers. +Alright, whatever on the images. I really don't see how that pertains to this subject, but whatever. And Jptut or whatever the heck his name is insists that they be sourced. So they're remain sourced so he doesn't get his panties in a bunch. At this point, do not remove the current list of DJ's/Producers because they are now properly sourced and referenced and what not. +How I wish we could just talk on the phone, then you would know by my voice my sincerity in what I am saying to you here, and no disrespect is meant at all and I only want to be a good wiki, and make you all proud of me. +" i just reread what i wrote above and i sound thoroughly unpleasant. sorry. i meant my tone to be that of ""chummy banter"", not rudeness. " +INEVERCRY YOU BETTER WATCH YO BACK BECAUSE I AM OUT TO GET YOUR WHITE ASS OKAY? HOW DARE YOU DELETE OUR WIKIPEDIA PAGE LIKE REALLY? COULD YOU NOT. LIKE DONT EVEN. WE JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW ABOUT CAROLINE & TYLER BUT NOOOOOOOOOO. YOU HAD TO DELETE IT. TBH UR NOT GR8 LOSER. A CATS LITTER BOX IS MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN YOU. I WILL RUN YOUR ASS UP A FLAG POLE & LEAVE YOU THERE UNTIL THE CROWS PECK YOUR BEADY LITTLE EYES OUT. KAWWWW-KAWWWW. +" Noveseminary is at it again.... You're at it again... get ready to run and tattle to the notice board again, no doubt....for real or imagined infractions by me, cuz you can't help yourself. You have serious issues, and you seem to add nothing more (at least to this article) but uptight nonsense and censorship and aggravation.....and I'm NOT the only one who thinks that. this was discussed, and I KNOW you were waiting for a time to remove the whole Mormon thing, but it's non-negotiable, and already established...your dislike of facts gives you no right to remove em... The Mormon thing stays, as it IS sourced, and is established, and is a point of example how ""separated brethren"" OFFICIALLY is not applied to groups such as Mormons. Get over it, and move on about it already. And by the way, THERE WILL BE NO 3RR VIOLATION BY ME AT ALL ON THIS. But it doesn't matter, as I know that you edit war regardless. You think that by waiting a week or two to undo the whole Mormon thing that that's somehow not a ""revert"". It's a manual revert, whether it was done 5 minutes later or 5 weeks later.....so don't try to fool Admins or anyone else with that tactic. It won't work. You had a hang-up against the whole Mormon reference from the very beginning, and you just WAIT for the opportunity to mess with it, and totally remove it. And then act all innocent that it's just me doing the ""edit warring"". Anyway, the Mormon thing is established, well-sourced, and important to note, for the reader, whether you personally like the sourced fact or not.... " +NO PROPAGANDA STOP PLACING OFFENSIVE MATERIAL. This is not a place for your propaganda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn8IlSpMT4c Sirtaki36 2/6/2015 +" Incorrect translation of quotations and improper combination of quotations from source In the discussion of the Pope's positions on poverty and inequality, there is an overly literal and incorrect translation of a quote from La Nación. When interpreting or translating, the goal is to accurately convey meaning and ideas, not words, from the source language to the target language. Also, the Wikipedia entry takes from the La Nación article two different quotes and combines them as if they were a single quote. It is inappropriate to treat exact quotations in such a manner. The discussion of the Pope´s comments about the poor should be re-written as follows: During a May 2010 speech in Argentina regarding the poor, he chastised ""the comfortable"" whom ""avoided considering"" the poor, saying: ""We have no right to look away, to turn down the arms raised by the desperate."" rodneygriffith" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of students at South Park Elementary. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" (outdent) Please don't feed the trolls by responding to Zixingche. This user (judging by his contributions) does not spend any time working on articles or anything else for the project, and just comes here from time to time to pick fights. It's in the article's best interest just to ignore him and not respond. '''''' talk/contribs " +Dear Watson and Christian All I said was that McFly were a bad band and mentioned that The Daily Mail had published a piece saying Arbeit Macht Frei wasn't such a bad Nazi slogan. Neither of these statements are trolling but the former is subjective and I wouldn't put it in an entry. Christian is always bleating on about people reacting to his own subjective views, and to his right-wing assertions. And then he complains to administrators who haven't always got the time to look at his history, and some of whom seem to enjoy playing god and go way over the top, watching carefully so that they can justify blocking poor bastards like me. You must be a bit bored, the pair of you. I have a 12 year old daughter. If she does something that I perceive as naughty I don't use it as an excuse a year later to ban her from going out with her friends. I think Watson is trolling me by watching my every move and if I get the time I will be be back on this. Christian asked me to stay off his talk page and I would have done so but didn't get the chance - My Dear Watson just zapped down like Zeus with his thunderbolt. Trolling as I understand it is serious and it's not what I am about. +", 11 August 2006 (UTC) I certainly do not have a problem with this user CORRECTING birth date years to reflect the truth, provided some kind of proof is given in the form of a link to an authoritative web site or other source. The evidence indicates however that the changes made by this user were in fact arbitrary additions or subtractions of a year or two or ten. It may be that the user inadvertently hit on a ""correct"" year purely by accidental coincidence, particularly if there are ""source information"" sites that have alternate years of birth posted as well. But there are other cases in the contributions list where the user made a change to a false year, and then changed it back to the correct year, either to confuse the anti-vandalism patrollers, or to make the latest edit look like a true and legitimate one. Either way, I think it would be good practice for us all to provide a reference link and edit summary any time such a change is made. In the case of celebrities with two or more possible birth years, then we should post all of them with an explanation and, again, reference sources for proof. Thanks! 18:41" +I see that my edits have apparently been reverted wholesale. +" I would be willing to consider your etymology if you would have spelled ""etymology"" correctly. Alas, your ""Betham's hypothesis"" is bunk - and the Classics community wholly backs me up on this. Check it out for yourself. " +get bent you faggot +I'll help with that. The picture tutorial is helpful. +Actualy, this entire article needs cleaning up.. a lot of the specs are for MTA:SA, rather than previous versions.. although the original introduction would imply it applies to them all. 80.6.152.186 +" MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? moronMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotjiggabooMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotkikeniggerMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? jewfaggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? moronMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotjiggabooMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotkikeniggerMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? jewfaggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? retardMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? MONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO WTC? Why MONGO? HAND.faggotMONGO, tell us. WHY DID YOU DO +" - I fail to see how it is harassment to point out that I was being harassed. I was being watched and followed by the users, my posts being summarily deleted or changed, being blocked, and accused of being a ""sockpuppet"" and treated as such with no proof, now there is a page on here with the names of accounts I am accused of owning that I do not. I would call that lying and harassment. I will not reinstate what I wrote, but I do not believe I was wrong in saying it since I could not get any other moderators to mediate, or intervene. 74.83.68.15 " +Hi This whole episode is being reported in the National Review: http://media.nationalreview.com It's also being reported on the blog havecoffeewillwrite.com http://havecoffeewillwrite.com/?p=1625 There is no valid reason to have this site down. Please put it back up immediately. +The fact that Wonder Woman has been restored to Silver-Age JLA history is not news? Surely there is a way to point out this fact and its *possible* implications without seeming too speculative vis-a-vis BC...? +Video link in UTube The link http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fC0ZBAjREOM has a piece a friend of mine found that is about a story from the Ghost Stations books. I feel that it a worthy link for the encyclopedia reference. +Patrick J. Kennedy Why did you delete my edit to the Patrick Kennedy article? My edit was completely factual. Homosexual Providence mayor David Cicilline will replace him in January 2011, and that is all that I wrote. I have undid your revision. Please do not erase my edits like this in the future. Thank you. 173.71.93.148 +Kayageum How do you know that? It was very long ago. Maybe named for the Gaya confederacy. +The Chinese media also discussed about different media coverages. They came to a conclusion that the Western media is no more trustworthy than the Russians'. Of course, the Chinese have been feeling pretty agitated about the Western media since their absurd coverage of the Olympic torch relay months ago. We can usually decipher propaganda by looking for what they did not mention. Georgia and the West did not mention why it launched a surprise military operation against South Ossetia. In fact, they hardly mentioned that at all. Russia, on the other hand, had little explanation for its advances into Georgia. +REDIRECT Talk:Pedro Vaz (northeastern Maio, Cape Verde) +Yeah, I did see that. There are quite a few submerged churches in Mexico, I know of two others. One was flooded by a plantation owner who wanted the native residents of the community to leave in the 19th century. The other was flooded when the Mexican government constructed the Miguel Aleman Dam in the 1950s. Maybe some day they will emerge as well. ) · snunɐɯ· +Sponge Bob Hey Sirtingle, putting plots are fine but you don't have to first delete this summary. I saw in the edit history you wanted to delete the summary, add the plot there, and then readd the brief summary and put the plot below. Just add the plot. and make sure when starting a new paragraph whatever you want to call it you use two equal signs around the names on ethier sides. +message to attackers Leave him alone. what has he done to you? you ips who attack this user give honest IP editors a bad name. this shit needs to stop now. 199.101.61.190 +It's not just me that's confused. I heard one TV show where the reporter said the rioters were disgruntled immigrants, and another TV show where the reporter said that the rioters were disgruntled right-wing ethnic Swedes who don't like immigrants. Maybe they are both right ? Are they fighting each other, or both fighting the police ? It seems to me to be counter-productive to be obfuscating this information because of some mis-conceived correctness. +talk page boxes FYI, your table of contents doesn't show until the end of the first box on the right, so there's a big blank space at the top of your page on the left. I'm using IE. +Actually it would be a sufficcient fix for what I wanted to do! I do not think your friends are honest. Even if I made a huge article about Khanum that explains everything with scienfic references, they will find another excuse to cancel it. I told you, all I want is to fix the wrong impression given on that page. Your friend blamed me for being vandal and uncostructive... But in fact they are not constructive either. +" You need to demonstrate that these sources are reliable, which says: ""How accepted, high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence. For example, widespread citation without comment for facts is evidence of a source's reputation and reliability for similar facts, while widespread doubts about reliability weigh against it."" The onus is on the source provider to prove its reliability. I note that the blog doesn't actually support the statement that it cites. " +" Rajus are Kshatriyas and it is not a claim and clarifications to the misconceptions or misunderstandings As i have clearly stated many no. of times and i am again mentioning that Rajus are forward caste in Andhra Pradesh and they are clearly mentioned as ""Kshatriya"" in Government's caste list and government's records and also even in overseas development institute.Those who have misunderstandings please see the elections of Government of Andhra Pradesh there u can clearly understand that ""Rajus"" are mentioned as ""Kshatriyas"" by Government but not Rajus or Kshatriya Rajus.see in the link: http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=rIRGU-HwBsjirAfM5YHIDw&id;=LSeOAAAAMAAJ&dq;=inauthor%3A%22K.+Ramachandra+Murty%22&focus;=searchwithinvolume&q;=raju Another thing i have to say is ""Kshatriya"" is used for only ""Rajus"" and it is a forward caste mentioned as ""Kshatriya"".In the Medeival Period Rachavaru,Andhra Kshatriya & Telugu Kshatriya is used only for Rajus.But in the present period,Government mentions Rajus as ""Kshatriyas"". Backward castes of Shudra varna in Andhra Pradesh who changed their caste names Other castes in Andhra Pradesh who are of Shudra varna but due to their succesful politicking in 1931 census changed their caste names.They are: Agnikulakshatriya,Palli,Vadabalija,besthaJalari,Gangavar,Gangaputra,Goondla, Vanyakulakshatriya(Vennakapu,vannereddi,pallikapu,pallireddi,neyyala & pattapu) whose occupation is fishing. Arya kshatriya,Chittari,Giniyar,Chitrakara,Nakhas whose occupation is painting & doll making. Perika(Perika balija,Puragiri Kshatriya) whose occupation is Jute weaving & gunny bag making. Thogata,Thogati or Thogata veera Kshatriya whose occupation is weavers. Rangrez or Bhavsara Kshatriya whose occupation is dyers & tailors. These you can verify in the Backward castes lists & their occupations provided by the Government of Andhra Pradesh list in the following link: http://www.aponline.gov.in/APPORTAL/departments/BC%20Welfare%20Reports/BC-Projected%20figures-final.xls""''''''" +" FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION Dr Philip Opas (defence lawyer for Ryan, recently deceased) made it public knowledge that he did not, and would never endorse Richards book The Hanged Man, because the facts surrounding Ryan life and case had been manipulated. The book was published 35 years after Ryan's hanging - only after almost every person directly involved in the Ryan case had died, making allegations by Richards impossible to retort or confirm as fact. Richards tried but failed to bluff Opas to support the book by signing it inside the front cover, ""To Philip and Stella from Mike Richards"". But it's no surprise that the highly intelligence and most experienced Opas was not easily fooled by anyone. The book became a toilet item. It's ironic that User:Purrum promotes and contributes to the Ryan article from two books, which not only contradict each other, but have also been exposed to contain lies. For unknown reasons User:Purrum deliberately ignores the mega referenced articles published over four decades that acknowledge the facts. 60.224.64.166 " +Final decision The arbitration commitee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Alfrem case 22:14, August 12, 2005 (UTC) +I've decided to be bold and deleted the paragraph about Dahl's Jack FM Arbitron ratings. It seems to be causing more problems than it's worth. Maybe over time we can fill it in with other info. +Sorry don't do blocks I'm really sorry.,.. I don't do blocks. I have 31 ISPs with many ranges. Thanks though. YourCousin +how do you KNOW it? I could equally argue that you and i know i wasnt intending it as a personal attack. +Talk:Sukhoi_Superjet_100#Vote_on_flag_removal This (inofficial) voting about flags and country info in orders might concern even this article. It is proposed to remove about 10.000 flags related to aircraft orders and articles including country info. +Let's Work Together I would be happy to work with you, if you would stop reverting better written material with references simply to keep your own writing. +27 00:45, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC) +" Shapiro is no more notable than medical doctors who have had their licenses suspended, or revoked. I can think of one doctor (a former doctor of mine) who had his license revoked for killing a woman with the improper use of anesthesia, insurance fraud, falsely advertising he was board certified when he was never eligible to be board certified, and by the time the state attorney got involved (which is what it took to get this doctor's license revoked in ONE state), three criminal counts of sexual assault. It took 9 years for this doctor to lose his license. It was in the local newspapers. Evidently, this all wasn't enough for national news. And there is no political group called ""Overdoctored"". Would any of you think this doctor warrants a WIkipedia entry? Sadly, there was no news about state medical boards revising their ethics rules. This man is now in New York, and of course, not practicing medicine - it took awhile for the three other states in which he was licensed to catch up with him. Yet this man is not infamous. Why not? If a lawyer can be castigated in WIkipedia for misleading advertising, why don't we just begin a whole slew of articles about other sleazy lawyers, and doctors, and accountants, and.... Is Wikipedia now a forum for releasing one's own dislike of a particular profession? " +Hi Cool Hand Luke, I put a message on my talk page that I'd like you to look at. Thanks. +If my name has to go every muslim with allah in his name has to pick a new one too. +" How many unsustained complaints were there? I noticed ""Prior to the shooting, he had never been the subject of a sustained complaint from the agency's internal affairs department "".. so how many unsustained complaints were there? Because generally if its not on film or doesn't have a dozen witnesses.. a complaint is going nowhere. Id be interested to know how many times people have filed abuse complaints.. sustained or not - " +" ""Multiple users"" of the pro wrestling Wiki cabal who manufacture consensus and force wrestling content into every article are the real abusers, especially when they send threatening anti-Semitic emails (like your new buddy ""3bulletproof16""). If you choose to continue to align with people like that, that's your choice. " +In the spirit of goodwill, I'm willing to nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, and outside editors will discuss whether Wikipedia should keep it. Would you like to provide a brief overview of the reasons why the article should be deleted for the benefit of editors? Please make it as succint as possible. (talk) +Naamswijziging Hi Ucucha, I did this request, apparently on the wrong place. Could I ask you to fix it? I would say it can easily be done by removing Songtsän Gampo and renaming Songtsen Gampo to Songtsän Gampo, as Tibetologist likes. There's not really a need to merge histories, I would say, because nothing has changed in the article. Can you do that or should it not be done that way on English Wikipedia? Regards, +Jayjg, I can't see one single innacuracy in Da'oud's latest comments. What opposition do you have to a POV-Check. Something about your edits you want to hide? +" ==WARNING: MEMBER THE WIKIPEDIAN GREEK NATIONALISTIC JUNTA. By User:Balkan == There’s a well collaborated (London based) group of GREEK Wikipedia sysops/users that has been spotted to work systematically in full daily basis propagandazing ultra natioanalistic Greek POV, and distorting related articles. They intervene in any Balkan history and politics related article, pushing Greek POV, launch edit wars, and repeated reverts of vandalized by them versions, permanent deletions, block users, merges and redirects to deletetion of undesired new articles. Their main target is to distort all articles lelated to ISLAM, TURKEY, REBUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, BULGARIA, ALBANIA (CHAMERIA), THEIR MINORITIES IN GREECE AND THEIR HISTORY. They attack every article criticizing Greece transforming it to Greekish propaganda POV. They became maniacs in optimizing dark side of Greek history.They communicate each other by secret e-mails avoiding messages through their talk pages to avoid publicity. This group acting in a systematic way to revert articles, when one of member makes the limit of 3 reverts, one another continues with 4th revert to avoid punishment for violating 3rv rule. Furthermore they are suspected agents of Greek National Intelligence Service (E.Y.Π. Κυπατζήδες) and believers of ultra nationalistic organizations of Greek “national interests”, as L.A.O.S. and Chrissi Avgi. They are also multiple sockpuppets and impersonators of their group members. They are all schizophrenics web vandals unacceptible to wikipedian community. Balkan history has labelled such people as GREKOMANS, a form of mental malignacy cited in Larousse dictionaries. Their illusion is MEGALI IDEA of Greek nationalism-expandism.They have been allied with Armenian, Serbian and Cypriot extremists of similar interest. THEY HAVE CONSTITUTED A WIKIPEDIAN GUNG, A GREEK PRAPAGANDA LOBBY, A GREEK EPSILON TEAM. All member of group are very radical nationalists. They work continously in three shifts over day and night. To verify chek their contributions, talk page, edits, deletions, blocks, directs, protected pages and act properly. Wikipedia isn’t the right place to propagandize for “God’s elit nations” as Greece. Members of gung involved: user:Khoikhoi sysop , He’s the chief-manager of group, recently probated by Wikipedia, suspected agent of Greek intelligence user:Future Perfect at Sunrise (sysop), GREEK, close collaborator of Khoikhoi user:Aldux (sysop), ), close collaborator of Khoikhoi user:Tekleni GREEK ,confirmed multiple sock puppet user:Telex,GREEK, confirmed sock puppet user:NikoSilver GREEK, close collaborator of Euthymios, vassal of KhoiKhoi user:Euthymios GREEK, confirmed collaborator of Khkoikhoi and Future Perfect at Sunrise user:Hectorian GREEKTAB user:Politis, GREEK user: AndreasJS GREEK, close collaporator of Khoikhoi and Aldux user:Miskin,GREEK user:mitsos GREEK " +"36, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Meagan Meagan Hey Meagan, I think Kathleen covered most of the stuff I was going to say. But in your third guideline, theres a sentence that begins with ""Choosing: choosing"" I think it's a great point, but I'm not quite sure that the way that it is worded fits with the rest of your guideline. I would either make ""Choosing"" stick out a little differently, or just get rid of the ""Choosing:"" introductiong to the sentence and begin it with ""Choosing the more.."" Overall I think you guys have all done a great job! I just kinda looked at some rewording issues because your content is great! Congrats girls, we're almost done! Tianna Shannon's Editing Comments: Hello I loved your beginning section on social support and found the definition of social support to be very helpful in my understanding. However, your second paragraph was a little too wordy for my liking and difficult to remain interested. Also, in your third paragraph ""with these types of communication.."" you did not mention any types of communication before, and therefore you cannot use these, until after explaining each type of communication. Finally, I would suggested maybe making your points in your verbal/non-verbal method section bulleted. Overall, you added great information to our article, take my suggestions as you wish. Hello You added some great information, I am just concerned that it is all from one source, or have you not quite finished adding your additional citations? I really love your choice of bolding and italicizing your guidelines, however guideline three is not separate from guideline two, nor is it bold/italic. Finally there us a Which, in your final guildline that should not be capitalized. Great work Meagan, take my advice as you wish. Hello You have made some great additions to our article, especially the use of the General Adaptive Syndrome. However, in stage three, stressor is missing a letter (small typo). You had a great point of how inadequate sleep leads to irritability, however, I suggest that you change ""less inclined to communicate"" to less inclined to communicate effectively. Also, in your section of language barrier, you used the word intercultural, I believe interlingual is a more suitable term as culture is not only defined by language. For instance citizens of Quebec, have Canadian culture despite speaking a different language than most Canadians. Finally, the point on imaginary friend, might be a little far-fetched, but it would be fine to leave if you see fit. Great work overall! Thanks for the tips Shannon. I used them all! The interlingual suggestions was perfect! 23:" +" Great. So, if I click ""nominate for deletion"" on the left menu, it will lead me by the hand through the deletion process? " +I'd be fine with British currency (1817-1972). I'd probably prefer that over British pre-decimal currency because it's more specific. On the other hand, those are not the first terms that would come to mind when searching for this article, so I think a few redirects would be helpful. +No problem. Somebody else blocked him. I thought about doing it myself, but decided a warning would be enough. I'm not moved to undo the block though. (talk) +RFAR Race and intelligence An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, +Is it time to withdraw the afd? +" It's OK folks, FreeRangeFrog is clearly making up for an inadequacy in their own life and needs to do what they did. Nice to see all the old glory hunters returning en-masse. '''''' Dick Laurent is dead " +‎OlYeller21 (talk | contribs)‎ (→‎Teams: An article about a subject that's over 100 years old shouldn't include a section current teams. I'll leave this here until after the AfD.) List of USASA affiliated leagues Cosmopolitan Soccer League San Diego County Soccer League Monterey Peninsula Soccer League Men's Island Soccer Organization North Coast Soccer League +, 17 September 2006 (UTC) What? My use of CAPITALS? That has nothing to do with reason! I am emphasising my point and certain words. Your edits are a grammatical travesty, do not adhere to wikipedia's neutrality policy, and are terribly written. Not to mention that they do not make sense. I would expect better from you. 22:49 +The template above was added by +Hello. Firstly, I would like to apologize for my rude message to you. It's been a rough couple of days for myself and I have been a little too emotional and quick to anger. It doesn't reflect positively on myself and was unfair to you when you were making perfectly legitimate questions and edits. I apologize for my message to you. It wasn't done in a rational state of mind. Secondly, it has been announced (I have actually had the priviledge of talking with a teacher at NHS who informed me of the move) that NHS will be the region's main immersion school. All Canadian students are obviously expected to have an education in French (at least up to Grade 9). However, this is what I believe to be the Immersion Program. It will only be for a select few students as the great majority will obviously continue to learn in English, but they are moving it from Aurora High. Hopefully that helps! JaysCyYoung +1 month topic ban on 2012 Presidential Campaign articles You were notified on 11 Sept 12 that all articles related to the 2012 Presidential Campaign were under article probation. On 19 Sept 12 you were warned again that these three edits were trolling and provoking another user. Today you boldly removed a referenced section of Mitt Romney dog incident. Your edit was reverted and you immediately restored the material with an edit summary that suggests there is a consensus to do so on the talk page despite that the discussion on the talk page has not reached a consensus and is learning toward removing it. You were invited to join that discussion and you chose to revert instead even going as far as to accuse another editor of personal attacks for this diff. It seems to me that you have trouble editing collaboratively on these articles. I'm issuing a topic ban for you from 2012 Presidential campaign articles for 1 month, broadly construed, across all namespaces except to appeal this topic ban to WP:ARBCOM or WP:ANI. In the future, you need to practice WP:BRD and avoid edit warring behavior, especially on articles under probation.v/r - P +You removed posts by me as well. Do you have any explanation? - Talk +Hopefully, it won't be challenged as unacceptable. Like as in the sun rises in the east and sets in the west . +Good grief! See what I mean?! South Africa forever! Down with Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States. Up with South Africa! Jeff Dean, 5 February 2007, (I don't what the time is South Africa, or I would insert it here as the Universal World Time) +"know how many playable characters there are. halReflex " +" Quotation Mark Errors Can one miss the darkling reflection of the Beckford character's ""insolent desire to ""penetrate the secrets of heaven"" in both ""Alastor"" ... The quotation marks here are a bit strange. I believe there should be another pair of quotation marks after ""desire""? So it will read, instead: Can one miss the darkling reflection of the Beckford character's ""insolent desire"" to ""penetrate the secrets of heaven"" in both ""Alastor"" ... But I'm not actually sure if the quote before ""penetrate"" is in error instead. Any ideas? The whole quote is rather confusing." +What is your racial makeup Muntu? +Thank you for asking, but I'm not sure I really have a qualified opinion. It's something I saw in passing once, is all... +I know the things you can find on wikipedia when your re shaping your user page +We need a reliable secondary source. +Conflict of interest The screen name of the major contributing editor suggests he or she is employed by the agency being written about. Sincerely, +" When I discussed with User:MarkSweep on a private IRC session about any post made between 12:35 and 16:52, he pointed the following out to me: (partial chat exerpt from the other day) mark_sweep you posted on markalexander's talk page at 13:40 UTC mark_sweep then at 13:42 UTC you posted to the reference desk: mark_sweep http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff;=prev&oldid;=39874588 Shultzii Those posts you just pointed out- they're troll posts? (I don't see how they are.) Shultzii They look pretty innocent to me mark_sweep that's what makes them troll posts Shultzii Making a wikilink and pointing it out? *scratches head* Shultzii I'll take a 2nd look at his talk page... mark_sweep the original question may look innocent, but it was pretty pointless; that's why people consider it trolling mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Oh about the thought of naming a new city of Hoeryong somewhere in the US? mark_sweep yes, but it's not even that mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Go ahead. Taking food out of microwave. mark_sweep an admin asks you to stop mark_sweep more or less accusing you of being a troll mark_sweep you continue with the same thing you were doing mark_sweep which only confirms his suspicion All I was doing was disambiguating what someone was thinking. They misconstrued ""Hoeryong"" as a Dutch phrase (meaning ""Child of a w""). In the ref desk entry from the beginning, I meant what if I named a new town after a Korean city? Therefore, I had to tell User:DirkvdM that ""Hoeryong"" in the way it was intended would be named after a Korean city, not a Dutch phrase. Not once did it ever even cross my mind that this was a continuation of a trollish act. MarkAlexander misconstrued it as such, so can someone please lift the block early?" +Is mentioned in the article, i just read, i`ll rate it a B. +" I will not move it, but only because of Baloonman's request, not because of yours. " +" No I am not missing the point; I am disagreeing with you. Since he still uses a regnal name, the ""other clergy"" argument doesn't fly. He was a pope and is pope emeritus, so his article's title should remain as close to the established convention as possible. The fact that he stepped down is not a compelling reason to drastically deviate. Nothing in what you say makes any logical argument for why ""Benedict XVI"" is the best form for a pope emeritus. In other words, in the formulation ""Because X, the unmodified regnal name is the most appropriate for a pope emeritus"", you have yet to supply X. This seems to be more about your personal preference than rules or logic. Also, since the article should match the other popes after he dies, what we are really talking about is what to call him while he is alive. Does it really make sense to drop ""Pope"" then add it back? What is the difference? Keeping the article where it is no more suggests he is the current pope than Pope John Paul II does or that Queen Victoria suggests she remains a current monarch. Even in the unlikely situation that someone arrived here from ""Random article"" and momentarily thought he was still pope, that would be cured immediately by the lead, the resignation section, and the discussion of his pontificate in the past tense. No case has been made for this change, so I don't see why you expect everyone to agree to make it. - " +" A question about IR filters I've a Digimax A7 and I am excited about getting an IR filter. Well, the first thing I needed to know that how sensitive my camera was to IR-filters, and I did a remote control test, in which I saw the light very brightly, so I think that IR photography would work fine with the camera. The thing that bothers me is: how do I install it on the camera, in practice (I hate it when there's no info on the internet about that..)? And why are the sizes that I found on an online store only 44mm or so, minimum. I presume it is mounted on the objective, obviously, but my objective is much smaller, 37mm to be precise? Thank you in advance ) [talk] " +Please get off it already. +Hi, I really don't understand why you don't like my article about Aingeljã). This is an artistic personal constructed language, there is already a category in this Wikipedia about this kind of languages. This is a very short summary of the Grammar, which can be read thoroughly in the external links. In fact, I can't really understand why there are already articles about Breathanach, Brithenig, DiLingo, Enochian, Fyksland, Talossan language, Verdurian language, Wenedyk and many others, and there can't be an article about Aingelja. I wait for instructions about what I should change in the article style, but I repeat that I can't understand your reaction. Greetings, +The possibility intrigues me too. Its quite tight, the diagram is roughly to scale and there is about 330 yards clear between ships 120 yards long, but it could be done. If camperdown had arranged to pass just behind victoria it should have worked. What we need is someone experienced with fleet handling who could give a view on whether it would work. I think what actually happened to the other ships after the collision shows it would have been possible for the two columns to turn inwards very tight without colliding or crossing, but only by taking extreme measures (ie turning by reversing one screw). Victoria seems to have signalled she was doing a tight turn without engines (there were signaling devices to indicate if engines were reversed). Markham seems to have started off with a textbook standard turn and then panicked too late, trying to turn faster. I thinkat the time the suggestion that the lines might have crossed was dismissed, but then, would a court-martial made up of the people involved have come to the conclusion that there was a simple workable solution which would have avoided the sinking. What I like most about the scissors is its elegance, it is so in keeping with Tryons style. Its not quite true to say the captains did nothing. There is testimony that some at least made preparation for a very tight screw turn, but their job was to follow the ship in front. +" Rami, i see u r hard at work on this site. i am happy it is important 2 u , but u really have 2 do more research: Pollard was in a ward for the criminally insane first (u deleted it) ""Pleaded"" is a syntactical error: Standard American English is ""pled"", both simple past tense, and past perfect tense (had pled). elaine zeitz began writing 2 jay (jonathan) in Israel 1 summer while she was there (she was a special education teacher in toronto and went 2 Israel 4 the summer). There were 2 prisoners she wrote 2 (pen pals )and she settled with jay. it is a safe relationship 4 her: he can neither reject her nor have sex with her, and she can claim they are married, and receive voluminous media attention focused on her alone. (if anything, it is a non-consummated common law marriage.) she never knew him before. he grew up in texas and south bend indiana, where his dad was an eminent professor at University of Notre Dame. Pollard went 2 Stamford and then Fletcher School of Diplomacy (Tufts University) before he landed his first job in naval intelligence. seems like you are wagging the dog, correcting and reorganizing rather than adding new facts and creating a clean, neat chronology. it appears as if you are fiercely protecting this site for some reason?? 2 many undos in 5 years: UNBELIEVABLE!! " +Woohoo! Thanks, Gatoclass! +":::::::Feel free to suggest as you please. You don't need my permission. Just don't expect anyone to take your suggestions (nor your grandstanding and soapboxing) seriously given your sock puppet history. I'll leave the humour to you too, hit-and-miss though you tend to be. I'm more interested in knowledge and fact. For example, facts such as ""who was the former One Nation branch president for Canberra (1999)?"". '''''' [ contribs ] " +" The inclusion criteria set out in the lede make it an exclusive list: The two example golfers (there are others) quite obviously do not meet these criteria. If we are to include all Jews in sports who have articles (which is pretty much the only way these two would get in) then most definitely, the criteria needs changing. The alternative is to establish clear criteria, perhaps on a per sport basis, and remove all those who do not meet those criteria. bigissue " +This section has been here for ages. And there are other sections about Karate's Influences in other places. No one has ever complained about these sections before and I'm not sure why you don't see the topical relevance of these sections to Karate. If the section is going to stay, it needs to provide context. Reducing it down to what you've proposed would be factually misleading. +Fantastic work. Congratulations all involved. (talk · contribs) +" Guide for writing an article Pratik206, welcome to Wikipedia. This is an actual message written by another editor just to you, not a standard form (or template message). I noticed that we have some common interests, including motorcycles, and that you have had some trouble getting your edits to ""stick."". So I decided to offer help, if I can. If you want to give a try at starting an article for the Honda Shine, I'd suggest going over this guideline: Wikipedia:Your first article. Your contributions are appreciated, and don't hesitate to reply here, on my talk page, or at WikiProject Motorcycling talk if you need any pointers from someone who has also started . — " +no really, if I'm being blocked for sockpuppetry (see block log), where are my other puppets?}} +" Hello! I am sorry I didn't respond. I've been running around in RL, doing things I'm behind in. Anyway, to answer your question, I am unsure how to answer. I've been using Wikipedia for years, but only last month did I start editing. There are some things I am not 100% proficient at, such as copyright laws, so I always read the Wiki-copyright page before I write anything. I usually lurk in the Recent Changes area, watching for vandals with the help of Twinkle. I am working on a Bot in spare time, and hope to have him up and running soon. Other than that, I can't think of a question or concern this second, but I am sure I'll think of something. Thanks again! ) (Talk!) " +"==Dickens Center== No problem. That makes sense, but I would like it to link directly from the article: ""NCAA Division I independents (college basketball)""is that possible? Thanks. rossp" +genres and related fusion genres +":I see that you regard edits by casual users automatically as ""vandalism"". This is very unpleasant edit commenting by you and also false. The piece about Galloway's comments later in the Iraq crisis are irrelevant to him liking Saddam a lot. Prove relevance, don't just resort to cheap points like ""vandalism""! Reverted and it will be again if you counter-revert if you can't be bothered to come up with an argument. " +" You're putting a burden of ""notability"" on this that doesn't seem to apply anywhere else on Wikipedia! But okay, for the sake of argument, how about the progressive academic Sayyid Al-Qemany, writing for the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Youssef, that the curriculum encourages ""extremism and terror""? (http://www.jihadwatch.org/2004/09/egyptian-intellectual-al-azhar-university-curricula-encourages-extremism-and-terrorism.html) " +" Here's your idea of ""discussion"" at chess article Talk threads, remember this post?:Hi Ihardlythinkso. On Talk:Checkmate, I asked that we not interact further, and that you refrain from addressing me. Yet, you've done so 3 times in the past day, including inserting yourself into a conversation between me and Eric. I requested that we not interact further after you indicated you didn't want to waste time responding to my future edits. I was hoping such an agreement would be beneficial to us both. Please respect my request. I don't want to interact with you further, and you've indicated you want the same, so let's part ways amicably, please. Thanks. — Jess· Δ♥ Now you come here playing Wiki-defender, Wiki-cop, when the three articles I removed my contributions from have nothing to do with you. (I see right through your transparent crap, Mann jess. You have a need for dominance and one-upmanship, and have taken the opportunity here to threaten and lecture when has nothing to do with you, just to fluff your obsession and ego. While all the time playhing innocent and ""collaborative"". Dishonest and transparent bullcrap. Deceitful assholery. Quit harassing me, jerk. " +" Liberal conservatism or conservative liberalism? An unregistered user added ""Liberal conservatism to Likud's ideology on 12 November 2006. I am wondering if this is exactly the case. Are we sure their ideology is not closer to conservative liberalism? " +Hahahahaha. Sorry, the idea that Lucretius isn't a science writer made me laugh. Perhaps it's difficult to get the tone of his writing through translations, but the didactic element of De Rerum Natura is only structural. One can make good arguments for Lucretius not really believing in his own philosophical arguments, but less for his theories on particles. This isn't an instructional guide. This isn't Nicander. 209.2.51.215 +Considering that this is an article about Anderson Silva, I don't see a problem in citing what he had to say about the fight. +Dunedin Modellers Hi, thanks for into the invite, some great stuff in there. Very tempting to get back into it but don't have the time or a good airbrush! Cheers. +Note: replied at User talk:Janke. +The first entry on this page is a direct copy of an abstract of an article listed in PubMed. This entire article is possibly a copyright violation and is at very least plagiarism. Please attend to it. +" Re. ""North Sudan"" is a name that is currently being used."" (1) Several other terms are also currently being used. Ask any Sudanese editor about that; there is insufficient basis to single out this one colloquial term above the others; (2) Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not an online journal - what is in use on a particular day is not determinative because it means so little and prooves nothing; the longer term must be taken into account. So, of course, it is hardly surprising that in the very month that ""South Sudan"" became independent, Press Reporters, writing for an audience around the world, in many cases an audience that does not even know where Sudan is...used the term ""North Sudan"". Press reports centred on one particular matter do not tell us whether Sudan is particularly commonly known as North Sudan; (3) there are other reasons apparent from the above discussion including where we explained that Samoa is not Western Samoa, Virginia is not East Virginia, Mongolia is not Outer Mongolia, Luxembourg is not South Luxembourg, Ireland is not Southern Ireland....You are trying to ""put the cart before the horse"" - trying to assert as a fact that North Sudan is the common name for Sudan before time has had a chance to determine whether or not that is correct - that is CrystalBallGazing etc; and (4) you need a consensus for your change and several editors have disagreed with your change. 84.203.69.183 " +March 2011 (UTC) Actually I'll address the concerns (as the site admin). The site truly has too much ads. The links in the menu are a bit misleading and Its one of the things that I intend to remove very soon. Any other ad unit however will remain in place. The profits just barely cover the costs of maintaining the site not to mention the time I invest in regular updates. So if any ads at all are a problem by itself I can't say much. But I think every site has its own way of funding itself, and as long as the information is free and th ads are reasonalby placed its oaky. As for the Cuban style only concern. Salsa Lust is not intended to be Cuban\Casino style only (actually it's even covering some Miami style moves too). Salsa Lust suppose to cover other styles too with LA as the first next candidate, but it might take some time until it happens for various reasons. So by looking at the rules presented it might be true that it's more relevent to the Cuban/Casino-style specific salsa article however it won't take too long until it will be relevant to this page as well. 84.228.98.233 21:07, 20 +answering would help142.162.207.169 +This is the end for me. I will never forget or forgive this. Fatuorum +" Bien sur it makes sense. And the 'city hall' claim is simply not true, Statistiker: NYC's human resources are even private corporations and State-run (like some of Paris'), and are just as complicated (if not more so) than Paris' are.  ✎ ✓ " +" Copyright violation When you get a change, we have another copyright violation at Multi-male group (history). It dates back to a very large edit on December 6, 2011. I've done a lot of clean-up, mostly by deleting the references and copyright violations. Most of the references were too specific for the material they were citing, or in some cases, were horribly off-topic. –  « talk » " +" Now it re-emerges as an article, but still without any references calling the pre-Antwerp sacks a ""Spanish Fury"" in English - I can't see this in Arnade. " +"::I've seen your posts and a number of editors like me are still left asking you to support your claims, . Please stop avoiding the reasonable requests as it is really starting to look like your being deliberately disruptive. Administrators are accountable for their actions involving administrator tools, and unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors who lack such tools. Subject only to the bounds of civility, avoiding personal attacks, and reasonable good faith, editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions. Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed. You put me on probation pacifically for edit warring on the Sinn Féin Article, could you please provide the pacific edits to support this as unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors! I may have missed were you posted them but I don't think so? 'fenian' " +Support per the eminently sensible, long-standing consensus that languages which share their name with a peoples or country - or anything else of significance - should be naturally disambiguated. We don't make the titles of articles ambiguous simply because they cover the primary topic. +As the user above says, the warning may no longer be applicable. At the same time, I am not all convinced that your intentions are honourable. In fact, I'm sure you're plotting something as we speak. This message is just to let you know that I've got my eye on you. 188.221.144.7 +The Moslems of Kailar, on the southern verge of what is properly Macedonia, are genuine Osmanli Turks, who are said to have been exiled from Asia Minor in order that they might be isolated. There is also a similar Turkish belt inland from the Aegean in the rich tobacco-growing country between Serres and Drama, but this again is on the fringe (the eastern fringe) of what is properly Macedonia. Elsewhere even the Moslems of the rural districts come within our generalisation. They are either Albanians or Slavs, [2] converted by force or allured by self-interest to Islam, and while politically they form part of the ruling caste, in language, origin, and even in many of their social customs and institutions they do not differ from their Christian countrymen. +" Sources I'm concerned that many of the sources seem to go back to press releases picked up by media we consider to be reliable sources. I understand that, (eg) the WSJ is unlikely to pick up a low grade corporation form a press pack, so that lends credence to it, but I'd prefer to see sources that feel less ""primary"". I'm in no doubt that the corporation has notability, but verifying it seems to be a challenge. " +" First of all, the changes that I make do not constitute vandalism by any definition in Wikipedia. I am making legitimate changes with valid explanations (""All of the example x3d, x3dv files work with any x3d browser, no need to differentiate between Flux and other browsers""), just like you give valid explanations when you revert my changes. We just disagree. By continually insisting that the HelloWorld examples be noted that they only work with Flux is a disservice to the reader. The HelloWorld examples work in any X3D browser, not just Flux. Because you want to maintain consistency between the VRML and X3D articles, you end up having incorrect information about Flux. I would think that correct information would be more desirable that incorrect information. I think this issue needs to have a 3rd party arbitrate between us. 138.88.82.92 " +" i just deleted info under the heading ""singles"" that said ""we get around"" is a herd single. this is not true, urthboy, a member of the group, created this track totally independant of the other artists and although the initial author referenced this fact, by placing urthboy in brackets after the fact, it still has no place here i feel, such information clearly belongs on a seperate page pertaining to urthboy, a link to which placed on this page. ( )" +Atheists HATE this guy How dare he attack their philosophy of Hedonism in brave new world!!!! +Videos Mistaken for One Shot Several Videos use trickery to hide the seams between a number of Long Takes. This has a long history in film, for instance in Rope (film) Alfred Hitchcock would pan into the black of a man's jacket or the lid of a chest in order to hide reel changes. |page=272 Today technology assists with digital editing techniques hiding the transition with compositing or digital lens flares, these can result in a video being identified as a One Shot. The examples below have been identified as One Shot in the past but later revealed to have been assembled from several long takes. +Message, Just Click Here +" Removed entries These two are at the hopeless end of the scale: they have no article nor incoming links, and either lack the slightest mention in the alternate article, or the alternate article also does not exist (and is unlinked to). * Trojan Battery Company, electric vehicle battery maker * The Trojans (ska band), a British group established by Gaz Mayall The third hints at the possibility of an interested editor producing more than a dictdef in the alternate article, but is unlinked to and is mentioned only as a list item. * Trojan (Conquer Online), character class in the game (In any case, i removed ""dual-wielding class"", since it's stub-info bootlegged into the Dab i.e. does nothing to contribute to finding the user's desired sense of ""Trojan"", and would only be pertinent in an article.) •t " +Joseph J. Romm You have some knowledge of this subject and have edited this entry before. You might want to take a look at the recent edit history, as another editor is zealously adding massive amounts of trivia and redundant information to the entry, and attacking any who attempt cleanup. Thanks. +" This is a little cryptic, so I will not be offended if you do not understand: Go to File > Document Properties, and find the part that says ""Custom Size"". Adjust the height and width till you get what you want (you will probably need to move the objects around on the document to get it right). Alternatively if you just want to eliminate blank space around the edges, you can select all objects you wish to be in the picture and click ""Fit page to selection"". Was this what you wanted? '''' " +Of course you are right And the people who have an investment in being big frogs in a small pond (by writing articles on synagogues and train stations and mushrooms and hurricanes) HATE hearing this. I left a long comment (see talk history) agreeing with you. As usual, the Wikidio...anz were more intested in playing the man than the ball, though. I actually don't think that requirements for reffing common facts is the main problem, though. That's a micro issue.71.246.147.40 +" Speedy deletion of Joelalex A tag has been placed on Joelalex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. |  talk  " +" Jesus and Messianic Prophecy Hey, you removed my addition to this section. I don't get it. You were vague, and mentioned how you didn't like my use of the word ""retort"". I wasn't trying to instigate some sort of battle between Jews and Christians or something, I was just reporting what the Christian counterargument is to certain Jewish opinions about Jesus (and note- I had referenced Bible passages). It is true- the Bible contains no time-line or deadline for the prophecies to work with. (If there is one then why don't you cite your source?) And the New Testament does give reasons as to why Jesus hasn't fulfilled certain prophecies, and talks about how he'll get to them later (eg, he will usher in the Messianic era of peace/God's kingdom after the apocalypse, as detailed in Revelation). What really bugs me is how you allow, and even restored, false claims about Christianity on this page. There is a line that says, ""Contrary to the Christian belief that the Kingdom of God is not worldly..."". I deleted it and explained how all the gospels, several epistles and the book of Revelation talk about how the coming kingdom of God IS going to be a literal physical thing on earth after a physical resurrection of the dead. I even put a reference (revelation 19-22)- this unambiguously spells out these points. 99% of all Christian denominations believe this." +"Stop ABUSE from MUSIKVEREIN, THD3 or whatever user. 1. Stop ABUSE from MUSIKVEREIN, THD3 concerning content quality. See my previous summaries for changes. Avoid non verified sources, they must be deleted, particularly any unreliable ""copies of copies"" and ""references with references with references"". What is more, this page must not be used for non verified claims from whatever community. There already were court charges and research on false copies of letters or false letters, dubious Web pages and so forth (Sviatoslav Richter had a clear and consequent stance concerning his life and privacy, and morally speaking it is more honest to refer to that). 2. Stop ABUSIVELY USING this page for any communities’ / community's claims: even the section ""trivia"" is discouraged and this page is not about hetero- or homosexuality, particularly not the body part of the page. 3. Any reference to Horowitz or whomever is absolutely of no interest and no use. Do not change subjects. We are not discussing him or pages concerning him. Hypothetically there might be abuse on those other pages, too. 4. Searching for I.P. addresses or user locations is a doubtful and generally speaking, a useless activity for well-intentioned users when it comes to well-intentioned users. Steiner_Redlich ( ) " +Technically speaking it could say all those things, but it would probably violate policy D. +Many also don't think that anti-choice and pro-life are the same. Just as here, that doesn't mean a redirect is inappropriate. The main point is, it is a propaganda phrase and having any article about it fails the test of neutrality. Furthermore, there is no one accepted libertarian belief or set of beliefs +" Hmm. I've looked up a little more, and found a possible reason why the second condition is often left out; you can use a less efficient version of A* that always finds the correct path without that condition. However, the usually-stated algorithm requires both conditions. These notes describe both algorithms, and call the second condition ""monotonic"". 18:04, Dec 26, 2004 (UTC)" +You could propose to merge the articles following the instructions at Help:Merging and moving pages. You could also simply post a related comment on the talk page of both articles. Contacting the creator of the recently created Alaria, Osborne, may help clear the issue up. Maybe he doesn't know of the other article? — aldebaer⁠ +As for the entry for street theatre, a redirect to this entry should suffice. +"ANOUNCEMENT I AM MAD AT THE PEOPLE WHO BAN ME FOR THINGS I DON""T DO SO ALL MEXICANS AND BLACK PEOPLE ARE SHIT HEADS AND IM IN THE KKK FUCK HEADS!!!!!!1" +Not only is there a consensus among federal agencies that the populated place named Tornado never existed and the short-lived census designated place named Tornado should never have been created, but this consensus is shared by all state and local government agencies as well. The United States Board on Geographic Names is the final arbiter in all issues related to geographic names in the United States and their definitive opinion is that Tornado was only ever a variant name for Upper Falls. Thus, my merger of the Tornado, West Virginia article here will only include references to the Tornado Post Office and not the Tornado CDP, which was created in error. It should be noted that the Tornado CDP had most of its population in Lincoln County, while the Upper Falls CDP is contained completely within Kanawha County. Therefore, no comparisons between the two are even possible, as their geographic overlap was relatively tiny. The Tornado CDP was ill-conceived, ill-planned and ill-executed and is now universally acknowledged as such, including by those who did it! +I've asked few projects myself at WP:FILM, WP:MILHIST and WP:CMC and there okay with it. Since the American animation work group of WP:ANIMATION is not very active, I've decided pull this work group under WikiProject United States. A dual tagging would be okay, so long as you do not remove the American animation work group from the WikiProject Animation banner. I've asked at WP:IOWA before, and they said to remove it. (Talk / Contributions) +If you insist on hounding me I will take this to the relevant authorities. Harassment is not productive. +" The crown prosecution service charged the gang with 75 charges relating to twenty six girls, ranging from rape to intimidating witnesses, though police believed there were many more victims. The men were charged in three separate trials. Name Conviction Abid Mohammed Saddique rape, sexual assault, sexual activity with a child, perverting the course of justice, aiding and abetting rape, false imprisonment, making child pornography Romaan Liaqat rape, sexual assault, aiding and abetting rape, affray, sexual activity with a child, making child pornography Akshay Kumar making child pornography Faisal Mehmood sexual activity with a child Mohammed Imran Rehman rape Graham Blackham breaches of Sexual Offender Prevention Order I think that the following need to be made clear as the have quite an impact upon how content is presented and also perceived. There were three trials over many months. Clarity needed. The trails were covered by reporting restrictions - that affects what is reported here. Full details of the trials are not public domain due to the need to protect victims - UK Law Applies. Big Questions - Does the table give undue prominence? Who should be included - all accused - only the guilty - only those assessed as guilty of sexual offences - what are the criteria to be used? Should it list only charges found Guilty or should all charges including not guilty and dismissed be listed? The Jury were unable to reach verdicts in all charges and the judge ordered they were to be left lie on file for future retrial should new evidence arise - this needs to be addressed as it is a legal reality and on record. Should the table address sentencing rather than charges? This may seem a cop out, but I have to point to the rights of Victims to use Wiki and not be abused by overly detailed content which does not add to overall reality. Footnotes can direct those who need full details to external sources. " +" It isn't contentious to call it the ""white stolen generations"", thats just silly. Many historians and media journalists have referred to it as Australia's forgotten stolen generation. When people think of the stolen generation they instantly think of the Aboriginals, the term white stolen generations was created to help distinguish it, although it was essentially the same practice. If you don't want to call it the White stolen generation, then why is it not contentious to call the Aboriginal one a stolen generation? I'm not accusing you of being racist, but your overtone is a tad hypocritical." +" Is it inappropriate to mention that Kyle is a mulatto of African American heritage ? Certainly one can see that by any of his youtube videos and web-site. or that both his parents were graphic arts trained ? from an accredited college ? i.e. It's important to know that barry Bonds Dad was a pro in MLB, that's partly why Barry was 1 of the top players ever/HOFer. Would there be an appropriate way of telling some of Kyle's witty real-life anecdotes ? Maybe via uploading of a Youtube video interview by his sibling ? I can see this is a slippery slope area & I do wish to both add useful info & follow the rules as best as possible. I do know Kyle & his sister are very busy, so I took my time to add some info I knew, sorry for not having 2ndary sources. What's rather funny is that if I were a lawyer representing Mr. Baker & someone added ""I lie all the time"" ...on the 6th most visited web-site in the world, I could prob'ly have that removed, rather easily, as an out of context remark. Maybe my studies in (academic) philosophy can be an asset to Wikipedia...maybe not. thanx for ur time = ) Sorry for the entropy. ""When two strong horses run side-by-side their hoof beats scare each other & the chariot is pulled faster and faster"" - Protagoras !" +" An admin warned the user not to edit war until my one day block is expired, so he runs to a proxy user (""wiki-mommy"") to do the job for him: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lukeno94&diff;=prev&oldid;=588610599 " +" Hello from a main page regular Recent vandal attacks on the main page where an 'interesting' picture has been snuck in via unprotected subparts of the main page have been annoying at the least - Yes it's true. It has been one or two lapses of concentration by admins who forgot to protect something that they placed on the front page templates. Admins are human, they do make mistakes. Everyone has been poked and reminded. I'm not saying that it won't happen again, but everything that should be done has. However. What should happen when such a vandal attacks? Within minutes someone with admin ability spots it, quietly reverts it and covers the cracks that the vandal oozed in via. The vandal is blocked, defeated and deflated, they move on. What does happen when such a vandal attacks? Everyone, their dog, cat, hamster and rabbits swamp this talk page with ""OMG!11!! I'M OFFENDED!! ARGH! ARGH! MY EYES WTF!"" style messages of outrage and indignation. The vandal says ""HAR HAR PWND! I EMS TEH 1337"", posts several taunting messages about how good they are and revels in the afterglow of their nuclear attack. Eventually, within minutes someone with admin ability spots it, reverts it and covers the cracks that the vandal oozed in via. The vandal is blocked and moves on with a self-satified smug smile and sticky underpants. People. If you get all up in arms about it, you're feeding the vandal's ego. Just let it pass. It will be reverted within minutes. " +(((hahaha, just thought the convicted sex-criminal in bold was funny, hahaha))) +Manchester Township Middle School Just started an overhaul if you'd like to help out a bit. +]] for GA status because of several issues, which are detailed on the article's talk page. If there are any comments you would like to make, or any questions you have about the failing of this article, then please forward them to my talk page. Good luck for a future candidacy. Regards, |Pass = == GA Review == Dear , I am delighted to inform you that I have seen fit to pass Robin Hood for GA status, as I believe that it qualifies the criteria that is commonly accepted by the community. Further details of the articles passing, and possible further improvements to the article can be found on the articles talk page. If you have any questions about the review, please leave them on my talk page. Regards, |Hold = == GA Review == Dear , I am here to inform you that I have placed Robin Hood on Hold status for a period of 2-7 days. This means that you have 2-7 days to address the issues detailed on the articles talk page. If I feel that, after this designated time, the issues raised have not been dealt with, then the article will fail. If you can address the problems in the period of time, the article will pass. If you have any questions about the review, please leave them on my talk page. |#default= == GA Review == Dear , I am here to inform you that I am currently reviewing Pass. Kind regards, +Archiving I'm A PC discussions +Uncle douggie sound like a shirt lifter to me +I editted his article now. Please correct and expand it from reference 田代まさし波瀾万丈伝 from now! +" NPOV I do not discuss the credibility of Solovyov. The problem is that the whole artticle is written in aggressively anti-Russian tone. The article does not use new works on the problem. So, yopu need to clean away these unproven and chauvinistic sentences: even overt instigation of a civil war Under the new treaty Ukraine was to become an equal constituent nation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth along with Poland and Lithuania under a name of Principality of Rus, forming the Polish-Lithuanian-Ruthenian Commonwealth. Brutal lies, because the treaty did not mention any ukraine. The latter were mercilessly exterminated along with wide-spread abuse and robbery of the civilian population Please leave this tone for nationalistic yellow pnewspapers. On April 21, 1659, after a morning prayer, Trubetskoy ordered an all-out assault on the fortress's fortifications. The city was shelled, a few incendiary bombs were dropped inside, and the huge army moved on to capture the city. At one point the troops of Trubetskoy even broke inside the city walls, but were thrown back by the fierce resistance of the Cossacks inside. After the fiasco of the initial assault, Trubetskoy abandoned his plans of a quick assault and proceeded to shell the city and to fill the moat with earth. The Cossacks stubbornly held on in spite of all the fire unleashed on the city: during the night the earth put to fill in the moat was used to strengthen the city walls, and the besieged even undertook several daring counterattacks on Trubetskoy's besieging army. These attacks forced Prince Trubetskoy to move his military camp 10 km away from the city and thereby split his forces between the main army at his HQ and the army besieging Konotop. It is estimated that in the siege alone the Trubetskoy forces suffered casualties up to 10,000 men.[4] Instead of a quick campaign the siege dragged on for 70 days and gave Vyhovsky the much-needed time to prepare for the battle with the Russian army. Please clean away this exaggerated and long tale about nothing. You must add information, that Trubetskoy negotiated with Gulyanitski and finally had to put siege. Gulyanitski just wanted to win time. You must give time schedule, dates of the events and clean away this heroisation of some coronel. Vyhovsky and his allies approached the area and defeated a small reconnaissance detachment of the invader's army near the village of Shapovalivka Why invaders? The Ukraine was part of Russia. The bloom of Moscow's cavalry, troops that happily accomplished campaigns of year 54 and 55 have perished in one day — the victors got only about 5000 captive. The unfortunate were led onto an open space and slaughtered like lambs — that was the agreement between the Crimean Khan and the hetman of the Zaporozhian Cossacks! Never again was the tsar of Moscow able to master an army that strong. In mourning clothes showed himself Alexei Mikhailovich to the people and the terror seized Moscow. The blow was so hard because it was unexpected, and it followed such illustrious successes! It was only recently that Dolgoruki brought to Moscow a captured Lithuanian hetman, only recently was everyone talking about successes of Khovansky — and now Trubetskoy, for whom everyone had hopes higher than for others, and who was ""a man devout and graceful, in military affairs skilled and a fright for a foe"" — has ruined such a huge army! After capture of so many towns, after capture of the Lithuanian capital the royal city trembled for its own security: in August by tsar's decree people of all ranks hurried to build fortifications around Moscow. Often the tsar and the boyars were present themselves during the construction; people from outlying areas, their families with meagre belongings filled Moscow, and a rumour spread that the tsar was leaving to beyond the Volga and Yaroslavl[1]. Clean away this quote or I will give other long quotes from other books concerning the battle. This is not a wikiquote. This citation is not appropriate. Then you must sit and read what modern authors write about the battle, different views about how it hppened. The only source is the Witness, and he did not gave many lies you put into the article. " +" Source? A well known move does not need a source, or you may as well remove the tons of moves on there without ""sources."" Just because you never saw it because you didn't watch then doesn't mean I just made a fake move. Why would I? Don't get ahead of yourself." +" YOUR A QUEER SOME PEOPLE WERE DROPPED AS A BABY... WERE YOU THROWN AT A WALL? Why would you do that you N00B ) " +"""I want to be a fuck you."" That's a song. " +You continue to completely miss my point. So that is all from me on this one. Thanks for your input. +Lebanon national football team +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '096''' " +It Is Not A Hoax I promus Got To WWW.newmovies.com look there +I'm sorry you don't seem to understand what the sciences chemistry and physics are, but my edits were correct and you are poorly abusing your role as an administrator. +It would appear that you think you must frequently edit Wikipedia in order to have any experience with it. As I explained in the witch hunt thread about my alleged sockpuppetry, I frequently read Wikipedia's ANI thread. I've been doing it for years. I found it a long time ago, and I enjoy reading it. For me, it's hilarious to see some blatant vandals try to wiggle their way out of blocks. Plus, there's always some absurd editors who just make a scene. I read your thread, which was one of the most entertaining I've ever read. Then, as a service to you, I registered a name because I didn't see that you'd taken a break. I understand now that you did take a break, and I already apologized for my mistake. Why do you think that I must be stalking you in order to come across your page? To me, that's a little out there, man. Of course, I don't know much about your history. Perhaps you're a little sensitive on the matter because of some past experience. In either case, I'd be more than happy to end this communication and wish you all the best (as I've already suggested, but you continued to badger me with your previous post). Or, for all I care, you can just block this username. It won't stop me from browsing Wikipedia like I have in the past. Either way is fine, but I hope you realize that I was just trying to lend a helping hand. It's offensive that this has gone this far. Love, Mungy +I'd like to call your bluff, since I friggin know these people or came across them in one way or another. I have relatives in the business and try to list the stuff as best as could.Rocky +January 2009 Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +Global domain international Can you provide sources to back up the claims made in this article? I have a number of concerns regarding it's accuracy. +In this case one could say that it is a primary source because Stephen McIntyre's opinions and ideas are a large part of what this controvery is about. What matters is if the source gives relevant information regarding the controversy, not whether the information is correct from a scientific point of view. +Why is this a FA? since it barely has 20 references!!!!!!!! +" The problem is not what you're trying to say but how you're going about saying it. Quoting the subject of an article in the form ""She remembers saying..."" is simply not encyclopaedic at all. That was the problem with the first as well. Nothing wrong with saying that she denied her rape had anything to do with her later career choice, but write it like an encyclopaedia article and not a magazine piece or fan page. Similarly with the second one - say it, if it needs to be said, but not like this. Try ""At this time, she stated her intention etc etc [ref]"". The problem of unencyclopaedic style is present throughout the article. Examples include ""In her autobiography, Massoli writes that"" - why not omit that and put a reference at the end? ""(Preacher has denied this.)"" - why is this sentence in brackets? ""Jameson says..."" - again, more like a magazine article. The list of awards is meaningless, really. It adds nothing to the article. Why not just have a sentence saying ""Her films have won numerous industry awards""? And finally, the length of the article is not appropriate. There is too much verbosity. Do you really think it's reasonable for an encyclopaedia to give Jenna Jameson as much coverage as Gandhi? " +" Volunteer Marek at AN/I. You closed the thread with the words ""Take the discussion to the article talk page"". That's no solution. There is bullying and POV pushing there. Volunteer Marek is one of the biggest offenders. His POV is obvious in almost everything he writes (which shouldn't be the case). He is perennially present. He owns that article. And he does all he can to prevent another views having any impact on the article, It's been that way since the incident in July. Discussion on the the Talk page won't fix it. I hardly ever edit there any more due to the unpleasantness and pointlessness of it all. Your closing comment was useless. Volunteer Marek has won, and you helped him to do so. " +Greg's Apology A while back I added Greg's on air apology to the Canadian section as a way to defend Greg as the section is very anti-FOX/Red Eye/Gutfeld/. However when I was reading the page today it appears to have completely disappeared. I checked the Articles history but could not find my edit on any of the pages. How is this possible? I hate to become a conspiracy theorist but I'm starting to think that some higher up Canadian and or Liberal Wikipedian deleted my entry and any history of it. Funny thing to is I that remember a user or possibly a bot came along and corrected a spelling mistake I made since I had just typed it while I listened to it on YouTube. Anyways...just thought I would mention this anomaly, oh and if any respected Wikipedian would have the cojones to add Greg's apology back then you will be doing history a great service. Seeing how Wikipedia will become more accepted for a source of historical information as we move on. - Red Eye fan BTW if you're wondering why I didn't have an account when I edited the article was because I do have an account however I choose not to use it do to the liberal bias and bureaucracy that is Wikipedia. +, 30 April 2009 (UTC) IN response to a request from LessHeard vanU, I responded on MAtt Yeager's talk page. — 20:51 +Your sockpuppet's account is blocked forever has been blocked indefinitely. I don't understand how a muslim like you can lie in this month of Ramadan. However you have still , so you are very lucky and you can still enjoy. I will not gain anything if the admins block also . I have just discovered that most of List of British Bangladeshis's articles were created from you. (BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOUR BODY TAKES FIRE WHEN I CREATE ARTICLES ABOUT BRITISH BANGLADESHI MUSLIM'S SCHOLAR) From now on try to be a good editor. May Allah give you tawfeeq. +Regarding edits made during November 29 2006 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +"==Speedy delete== I'm not sure what metric was used to identify this article as ""blatant advertising"". The article appears to address an important biological phenomena and has inline references for many of the claims. This is a new editor making quite a reasonable start, what ever happened to WP:NOBITE? The article probably should merged into IGFBP7 and the section on editing there expanded. Similar with many of the new articles, especially GABRA3 RNA Editing and GABRA3, where an extensive RNA editing section was already in place. " +" ""the New Church belief that both the Roman Catholic and Protestant Churches are in a fallen state."" Okay, so what about Eastern Christianity, ie the Orthodox Churches? Does Swedenborgianism consider them to be apostates, or not? Grigrory " +" Ah. It appears that article isn't free, so i'll have to leave it to you if you have access? — ''''''  Talk? " +Dear JDWolf: please make your own judgements about whether i contributed in good faith, and good humor in the past. my personal life has been trashed by PD, and this kind of pettiness is just one more bridge too far (please see my note under discussion). I would like to be able to edit again; I am careful, contientious, honest, capable, and in a postionhomeless and on state papers, in large part because of the malice of my husband and the incompetence/inattention/inexperience/insensitivity of psychiatristswhere meaningful activity, even trivial, matters to me. thank you for your help, competence, and good will in the past. thanks barbara davidson sept 9 06 1:08 pm +" Alawis hello im new to this and dont quite no how i would send you a message through this? but how would we be able to discuss the Alawi page? i found some things that you were tryin to explain be incorrect. Every Alawi person i no Woships the Imam Ali in the Shia way, and worship all of the Prophet Mohammads family, and the we worship both the Prophet Mohammad and the Imam Ali, and follow both their teaching, we do not just follow the Imam Ali teachings, we follow the Prophets as well. Alawi int he past 50 years have become closer to Shia, and do not celebrate Christmas. Or any other Christian Eids. I know from me and my family we celebrate all Shia Eids, and for Ramadan nearly every year we choose to fast. And yes our teachings are kept private (not secrete) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Well, we should probably discuss this on the talk page on the Alawi article, but anyway, I believe the Alawite beliefs vary quite a bit, my family do for example celebrate Christmas and other Christian festivals, but they are Lebanese, so they may have retained more of the original Alawite beliefs than the ones in Syria, who try harder to be accepted as true Muslims, so that the validity of Bashar Assad's presidency isn't questioned. My family is Alawi, and we celebrate the Shia Eids. We dont celebrate Christmas how can we, when we dont believe the story of the 3 wise men, ad we dont believe in Joseph, to Muslims Marry wasnt married and God had sent ""Zacaria"" to guard her.et c The part about How we Worship the Imam Al, to Alawi we follow both Teachings of the Imam Ali and the Prophet Mohammad. None of them come first, in your case your kinda saying that Ali comes first before the prophet. Alawi only have the Quran and their own scriputres as Islamic text. And iv read from other websites that Aparantly Alawi worship the Imam ALi like a God, when we dont. When you are trying to Explain the Trinity thing, your as basicly saying that we belive Ali is God, in 3 forms, which complely contridicts the point of us being Muslim. That there is no one but Allah and there is only One god, and he has no sons etc. And we believe in Rencarnation as is. And your should say that when the boys study the Alawi text, you should say after 15/16 boys can choose to go deeper into the relgion and study more, or choose not to study more. i no from my grandfather he went deep into the relgion and spent his whole life studying it. Where as my dad stoped when he got married and had kids (so around 22). Well, I didn't write the article, and I'm not sure who added the trinity stuff, but if it isn't sourced, it probably shouldn't be there. As for beliefs, well, as I mentioned before, the Alawites in Syria have changed their beliefs to become more like mainstream Muslims, so many of the older traditions might not be practiced there. It's different in Lebanon though, where the Syrian government is unable to regulate the sects like in Syria. " +edit this page any further. +What has accent have to do with it? Does it matter what accent he spoke with? +" WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition Note: Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article (Wanna Talk?) - " +Wikipedia is not censored. I feel a diagram, as you suggest does not do the job of a photograph. Take a look at any fine medical textbook. There you will find plenty of, what many consider, disturbing photographs. I don't know that the juvenile claim can be verified. I know a woman well into her twenties with a similar looking vagina. It seems appropriate to have a picture without pubic hair since it offers a better view of vaginal anatomy. +" Not a problem. Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) at the end though, as this shows who the comment was left by. At this point, I don't know who you are. lol. This should be done at the end of every talk page comment. You would also benefit from signing up for your own account (the ""sign up"" link at the top of the page). " +U no flip that dick? (ps. thankx for the block) +" Did you restore the content? Until this is settled, the information should be restored, especially considering 's apparent confusion. -''''''The '45 " +" Stubbornness Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable—you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. Repeated deletion or addition of material may violate the three-revert rule, but this is not ""vandalism"" and should not be dealt with as such. See also Tendentious editing Also can you refrain from calling anyone a vandal or try indicating they are vandalising without proof thank you" +Not Rocket Science??!! Haha. My mistake. (message me) +" Things don't have ""real names"" that exist independently of what people call them. ""Anarcho-capitalism"" is by far the most commonly used unambiguous description for what we're talking about here, so that's what we call it. Also, you really think ""anarcho-capitalism"" sounds sexy, moreso than ""radical capitalism""? Neither term sounds appealing at all. You really kind of impeach your good judgment a little by making such a claim. - e " +" That you admit to reverting multiple editors of this article, many of whom have made similar edits as mine, shows your outright monopolizing and dominance over this article. As it says at the bottom of this editing page, ""If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly...do not submit it."" Lastly, you have continued to refer to my edits as ""adding poor information and vandalism"", yet you have not once given an example of wht poor info I may have added (none) or in what way I have ""vandalized"" this article. Perhaps it's time for you to admit you have a bias related to this subject matter and how the article is presented and that it's time for you to PLEASE STOP! I agreed to use this discussion page to discuss changes, but not to be bullied, nor will I accept your unwillingness to accept the fact that myself and others believe there is an obvious skewed POV in the second paragraph of this article. Ps- reference to the China as being indicitive of more than an isolated incident is found in Klapthor, Margaret Brown (1999). Official White House China: 1789 to the Present. Harry N. Abrams. ISBN 0810939932. 74.73.106.239 " +I suggest you learn how those policy statements work - anything not rescinded by a later statement remains their official position. +" Thanks for the pics of the Pope etc. I don't think those crowds are anything like the size of the Indian crowds that prem Rawat attracts, and a newspaper photographer wouldn't be allowed on stage with Prem Rawat. Publicity isn't the intention, whatever some may think. Not sure what you meant by ""that characterisation,"" but the text makes it clear that these articles are not press releases, if that's what you meant. The reporters describe their impressions of the crowds, security measures taken, etc. And work? I have to get out of the house and earn a living, that's all. " +" and i think it was yung eaazy himself! " +""" without any reason." +"{| class=""wikitable"" style=""text-align:left"" |- valign=""top"" ! width=""30"" | Rate ! width=""300""| Attribute ! | Review Comment |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 1. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 2. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 3. |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 6. |} Note that the above ""second review"" was passed arbitrarily and that the article itself has not even been thoroughly checked. There are examples of poor grammar, original research, messy referencing, non-neutral sourcing, and the lead is abysmal. has made an uninformed and incompetent ""assessment"" as a favour to the nominee, not a sound review based on guidelines. There is no evidence to suggest that this GA was passed based on WP:GACR, nor that they understand that this article fails to meet MOS:LAYOUT requirements. This was a petty ""pass"" by an editor who was acting in bad faith for the sake of melodrama, making an uninformed assessment. The nominee calls GAR a ""Russian Roulette"" and GregJackP has proved to be the bullet that kills the process. This review takes the piss by passing a low-quality article without a proper review ever having taken place other than by me. And my review is a God-send compared to Greg's lack of review notes. I hope his ""friend"" is happy with this dysfunctional article, as it is nothing short of a mess. I could write a better article in my sleep. ''''''{chat} My, my. A little prissy, aren't we? I don't know the original editor, and if you {{tq|could write a better arti +sorry but no i dont have it and im not sure how that is relevant or if i even understand u +Reviewing admin, please note +Well I appreciate your sympathy. If you ever have the spare time, feel free to help me in this anti-Castrosanitization campaign. 03:09, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) +" You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. " +" The Christian Convert in Afghanistan was acquitted The text in the ""In the News"" box should be updated." +If she is a linguist then what theoretical framework does she work in? Generative Grammar? She probably doesn't even know what Generative Grammar is, she has probably never read anything by Chomsky (to do with linguistics) and she grossly misrepresents our field. All of these things are worthy of being in the article! Hey wiki nazis, don't you bastards take this down again because I'll keep doing it. +I'm just trying to stop those arab-hating jews. Drive them into the sea! +" Okay, thanks. I was not aware. " +I agree they should've been merged, however, I don't see why the List of Mormons was moved into the List of LAtter Day Saints. The List of Mormons was more complete, it seems most of thos on the List of Latter Day Saints were takne from the List of Mormons entry, rather than the sources cited. Oh well, it's what I get for being inactive for too long, thanks a lot. +Well, silence was an answer... So I just edit unilaterally, and don't you anybody dare to revert my edits (. Best wishes, +Fk Off== Fk off you Dragon Ball nerd. You like animey and manja. You son of a bh. You were fking mean to VegetaSaiyan, the fking nerd. Go fk off and get off Wikipedia, you fker. == +I am from the AACD and posted the information pertaining to the Academy. Is that ok for me to do? Thanks, Anna Velten +The relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection, but the dispute tag has gone on and off in the last few days. The section regarding move protection has never been in dispute, and accurately describes current and historical practice. - T +"::BTW I think the data alone shows the huge population losses (""exoduses"") of Serbs from Kosovo during Communist era (the ""hundreds of thousands""). Don't they? PaxEquilibrium I think we should respect the data collected by Yugoslav Statistical offices. It makes no sense and would be POV if we start redefining the nationality of people. During the communist era many Serbs (as did many Albanian too) chose to leave Kosovo because Central Serbia was more developed, both economically and culturally. Many Serbs (and Albanians)who wanted to study had to move to for example Belgrade and did never come back, this happened all over Europe, and not just in Kosovo. People moved from rural areas cities and for many Serbs is was natural to study in Serbia (Kosovo did not have a university until 60s). Maybe some Serbs left Kosovo because they did not want to live in an area dominated by Albanians but it is more likely Serbs left Kosovo because of economy and education than Albanians. You are saying more than 400 000 Serbs lived in Kosovo before the 1999 war. I don`t believe this and even Serbian government have not said something like this. 400 000 is 25 % of the population and we all know Albanians in 1991 had 82 % of the population(100- 25 = 75 % Albanians + other minorities??). " +The link to iGames does not violate WP:External links or WP:Conflict of interest because it is being added from a neutral POV and I have nothing to do with iGames. the only reason I edit here at the cybercafe from this IP is because the school is blocked! +one of many goals is to make a list of and memorize the names of ALL native american indian tribes. definitely including those from mexico, central america, south america, and the west indies. another thing i'm curious about: has every indian tribe had it's own tribal religion, at least historically? +"to the list of accounting software but someone else removed it so I went to add it again. The reason they gave for removing it was that it was ""advertising"" but this is incorrect" +A simple Google search indicates that the man was a journalist. There are several photographs available on the Library of Congress web site. He was unlikely to be an accredited diplomat. Journalists are covert gatherers of intelligence by definition and a USSR-based journalists was undoubtedly on the FBI counterintelligence radar. The Russians would be unlikely to use such a resource as a spy when they had accredited diplomats in the intelligence establishment who were protected by diplomatic immunity. They also had a significant establishment of agents in place at the time. +OMG. i swear i didnt edit any of avril lavigne wikipedia pages. something here is wrong, someone is editing wikipedia pages using my ip or somthing S +My ideas are not against socialism at all, Islam is not socialism, in fact, Islam stands against everything socialism stands for, do you think Muslims tolerate other religions and Atheists and Agnostics while in their countries? Of course not, and I don't care whether I am against multiculturalism, multiculturalism has failed, Muslims hate us, we cannot change that. I am not a racist as well, I am proud to be European, what is wrong with that? +Please don't post sarcasm. Wikipedia is not the place to take up feuds or vent personal feleings. If possible, please generate a rational argument why the Cayra entry is not WP:N. If you can't produce one, then please remove your vote from the Cayra deletion discussion page. Your continued focus on me and avoidance of that issue is problematic. Please remember that the purpose of Wikipedia is not to socialize, but to contribute to the encyclopedia. Here is a good start!~ (The five pillars of Wikipedia Best wishes! wikieditor9999 +We live on a world with nearly 7 billion people, resource scarcity and access to basic necessity are serious issues which the majority of those people face. I think that we as individual members of humanity owe it to ourselves and our brethren to now and again contemplate on our net utility and indeed consider if our greatest contribution wouldn't be the ultimate one. Going on past contributions and approach of the editor in question I am personally convinced that a detached analysis would favor such an outcome. That said, those same behavioral artifacts also point to the inability of the editor to act in such a selfless manner, so your concerns - while no doubt thought to arise from the best of intentions, are for naught. +Oh, OK. Thanks again. +Just hope to God this will be accepted. I have learned my lesson. 97.102.153.253 +What are you talking about? The way it's written now is fine-User:Soccerguy1039 +I also wonder where Gunther went. +Summary on all nine grahas I have restored the summary on all the navagraha which an anonymous contributor deleted. The value of having this information all together in one article is to save the user having to enter and exit no less than nine different articles to get even the most basic information, even if that information is duplicated. The information given in the table is simply insufficient, and at least a paragraph on each graha is necessary if this article is to have any value. +I agree with promethesu, now the consensus is 2-1 to remove. case closed +I am still not able to identify the source your complaint unless you tell me which articles you are refering to. Can you let me know what exactly which articles your are refering to? +They had somefink about the tattoo but it actually reads:Mother Love,not to be confused with Mother's love.But it's pretty funky looking so that probably threw you off.The tatto is a reference to a Queen song(as is many other things)possibly be cos one of the people working on Resident Evil likes the band Queen.Good observation though. +, 19 June 2008 (UTC) last warning? i didn't got the first one yet! by the wy who do you think you are some kind of mod? you aren't but probably a jealous xbox fanboy. and put stupid tags on stub anymore you moron. 15:31 +Whatever, you pïece of cr@p! +If any administrator was in my position they would have blocked Flyer22 and removed the allegation from the page. +I'm sick of wikipedia. It's full of illiterates and idiots. Shove it. +Hi Lisamichelle2008. I understand how you're feeling and have removed one of the edits from public view as it was a WP:BLP violation. I can't run a checkuser and tell you results due to the meta:Privacy Policy and I should probably mention that Wikipedia has a policy which states that legal threats aren't allowed so you might want to strike your comment above. Let me know if there is anything else I might be able to help with. Regards, (talk • contribs • logs) +Excuse me Excuse me, but why did you delete the article about Brad Sommer? It was a legitimate article by Wikipedia standards. +" This page should be deleted. A Business ""magnate"" is not a thing. It is certainly not a thing deserving of a wikipedia page. You're all idiots, especially whoever wrote this page. 24.235.129.212 " +Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. +And I'm not that person you say archipelago, that was sure someone else saw how wrong you are and try to help you, as we doing right now +Skins edits I see you went a bit mental over my Skins edits. You are quite the insecure little loser aren't you? I mean, I won't be too harsh, you're from Kent and you're a nerd who does computer engineering. So I guess talking to people on wikipedia is pretty much the pinacle of your social life. Especially considering how ridiculously ugly you are with your hangdog expression, your long face, large strange indents under your eyes and what I can only assume is a broken nose. Clean yourself up mate. PS. University of Kent is a piece of shit. +Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement Last month you made a note that Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement has inaccuracies in it. Is there any chance that you could improve the article, either by adding better text or removing the incorrect text? FYI, I believe one of the litigants, Barrett, may have written the article. - +Pashtun majority in your dreams of 1990 and the Daus Khan era, the era of falsification of history, culture and identity.. Kunduz province and Kunduzi people are fucking and raping Pashtuns days and nights... Pashtuns from all corners get kidnapped, killed and burned or digged alive. Your time is over and you can count your days, Awghana e KussmadarZaiya ... it´s time for Jews to go back where they came from, as well for Ghalzai Mongols to go either back to India or Mughalistan. Otherwise, Uzbek-Tajik unification will keep raping Pashtun women and daughters and bearing illigitimate bastards who speak Uzbaki and Farsi but as honouless and products of rapings will still call themself Pashtuns LOL .. count your days ... tick, tack, tick, tack hahaha 84.59.190.210 +There are not third-tier municipalities. Just because a district municipality is independent of the others in the district does not mean the other belde/town municipalities are another tier. +okay From now on I will write here ulan uguli +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, Rlsimpson24! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • [[Wikipedia:No legal thr +is he born in 1929 or 1925 ? IMDb says 1925 while english wikipedia days 1929. +" You know, I do strive to develop that NPOV but, I have to admit, I fall short sometimes. Hell, I'm only human. But you, on the other hand, seem to have the discipline and skill to stay fantastically NPOV and never waver. It's really something to see. Now, should we move on to discussing how the quotes above might best be incorporated into the article? For one thing, I think that they clearly contradict Rawat's 1999 quote that suggests that a lot of these ""big"" ideas about him occured when he was ""only eight"" but that he's done what he could as an adult to disabuse them. What his organization published here in 1979 suggests quite the opposite. " +By the way, now that I've read your entire blog entry, it's excellent and I totally agree with you. It's just not appropriate to link here. If it were, there would be a thousand such links in HRC's article. A more appropriate way to do this might be to add a paragraph to the article, and link to your blog as the source, something like: Hillary faces two major obstacles to getting elected in 2008. The last Northeasterner and the last Senator elected president was John F Kennedy in 1960. Prior to that, the last senator elected president was Benjamin Harrison in 1888. Someone may still object to it, but it's much more subtle this way, and Wikipedia loves text with sources much more than external links. Also, remember to sign your responses on this page using four tildes, as shown above. +Hello,sorry to waste you're time hello, sorry to waste your time.I'm sure you are very busy,but you are a faggot? +" Your reverts of binary prefixes You reverted binary prefixes with absolutely no reason. The ""debate"" is still going on and the current wording of WP:MOSNUM (even if it hasn't been discussed) states that this kind of changes must stop. You are violating WP:POINT, again. " +"I stated more than 3,200 Serbs killed by terrorist ""KLA"" and there are names , when they died, and how they died for each of them, human rights watch has nothing like this so I think it should be removed." +" ""considered the greatest = POV. greatest = fact, assuming you qualify and validly substantiate the given criterion. Is wiki about facts, then, or POV? " +\ Well, how is wounded Palestinians fleeing to Hospital's in Israel now related to the attacks in Gaza?? Also, I fixed the awkward phrasing but the motivation behind my quick rewrites was because your edits were loaded with whitewashing and simply false information. As I stated in the talk, If you plan on removing ENTIRE paragraphs and inserting weasel words, go to discussion. Thank you. +Hi, why did you delete the section about Shmuly being a convert? What was wrong with it? Thank you 184.177.112.118 +Image:Megaphone_screenshot.jpg I have tagged Image:Megaphone_screenshot.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. +" You consider it how you like. If the image is not relevant to the article topic then there is a pre-existing consensus, embodied in the form of the manual of style, that it should not be included. It will be you who is editing against consensus, not me. It would be nice to illustrate the article, but an image ""inspired by"" the article title is not an appropriate illustration. 201.215.187.159 " +^^^Again, I agree with this dude. No way Dem Party qualifies as center left to left. More accurate would be center right to center left. +":::::I take your response as ""apology accepted"". Thanks. " +Just a suggestion for the Super smash Bros series page If you follow the talk page for Brawl: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl It has a warning about adding YouTube videos, perhaps you should add that warning to the series page? All the best. +" Hi, sorry your page got vandalised. If you could collect several IPs (they are editing from a dynamic IP) then we could try a range block. Please try not to take the vandalism too personally or too seriously. That is what they want to happen; it's called trolling. Best to WP:RBI: remove the post, block the user, ignore. (Talk)" +" ""River Manche"" The term ""River Manche"" has been used to describe the Rhine's course after confluance with the Thames or the Seine during the last glaciation. Is this accurate and worth mentioning?128.240.229.3 " +He himself mentioned it on one of the episode commentaries on The Simpsons DVDs. I believe the name was chosen as an homage to Abraham Lincoln. +Rms125a@hotmail.com's vandalism This article has been repeatedly vandalised by Rms125a@hotmail.com. who appears from this and other discussions to be an obsessive compulsive individual with a record of anti-Catholic bigotry (not an issue in this instance). Rms125 has deleted properly researched contributions with unfounded and poorly written passages of which the misidentification of Alzira's paternal grandfather as her father is only one. This is the kind of action that render Wikipedia suspect. A pity. +" -""all we can say is that the usage exists"" No, you can't. All you can say is there is accusations of usage. You haven't even gotten as far as finding a subject for this article yet.129.133.127.244 " +Wikipedia:No original research +Suggestion to add to first paragraph re: Finger's role vs. Kane's I'm the author of the only bio of Finger and I can't quote myself, but hope someone would be willing to add this quotation from Jerry Robinson to the first paragraph: Jerry Robinson said, “[Bill] had more to do with the molding of Batman than Bob. He just did so many things at the beginning,…creating almost all the other characters,…the whole persona, the whole temper.” It is from page 43 of BILL THE BOY WONDER (already cited in article). I feel it is the most compelling and authoritative statement explaining how significant Bill's role was, and Jerry is certainly in a position to make such a statement as he was one of the ghost artists who began on the strip during its debut year. He worked closely with both men before National hired him and Finger away from Kane. There is considerable misconception about how involved Kane was in the creative aspects of the strip. He was not an idea man and in fact did not write a single Batman story in his lifetime. Thank you for considering this. +Thanks, I didn't realize that. Let me see what I can find. I would assume Facebook would be out too? +Yet you failed to notice your other error in reverting a perfectly acceptable and needed link correction. Just out of curiousity, how old are you? Up past bedtime, getting sleepy and losing attention to detail, huh? 71.10.138.114 +What did Amelia Earhart Accomplish? im doing an assignment. I need help. +" You said that according to Lawson and Sloane, Resolution 567 referred to ""“self-determination” as a minority in a nation-state"". The link I provided to the resolution shows that it says no such thing and Lawson and Sloane do not make that claim. Perhaps you were confusing the resolution with something else. And I did not say ""a territory cannot exist"" in a nation-state or a federal republic. Clearly it can as an ""incorporated territory."" Both Canada and Australia have incorporated territories for example. (Although they are not technically ""republics"".) Obviously if a country has territories, it will exercise some degree of jurisdiction over them and may allow them some degree of self-government, but that does not incorporate them. " +" Welcome to the TE corps, if you want to help out processing edit protected template backlogs you may want to add Talk " +" Interesting... i'll be waiting to see something more and from third party sources, though:). btw, i did not know that there had been used such means to force the world call it ""Istanbul"":/. Also, if i were u, i would be suspicious reading that encyclopedia, since it doesn't say a word about anything that happened in 1930... Ciao " +You Dick You're a big, anti-Japanese dick, you know that? I think you should be given an indefinite ban. That's what you should get, an indefinite ban! +" Your submission at AfC Saint Michaels Township, Madison County, Missouri was accepted Saint Michaels Township, Madison County, Missouri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! " +That's a good catch. Per , Burger did win the award in 1987. Stuart Symington won it in an earlier year. I assume that someone went through the articles of all the winners noting their awards, and forgot to change the name. I'll fix this now. +Seriously, stop. There was no Isaias last year. ♫ (talk) +oceania please see WP:SEAOFBLUE for reason for revert, happy new year +we do threats now? ok i couldn't care less about your threats. do what you will, i absolutely couldn't care less. I've violated no policy. Your intolerance demands you take action...go for it. +Animal in Peru I found good quality image of a small animal when looking for parrot images. If it can be identified, I would upload it. +" WP:AGF I think you should have a good look at yourself before you criticise others like you did with me here. You may not have realised it but you were a hairsbreadth away from insulting me accusing me of ""gravedancing"". 82.132.218.163 " +REDIRECT Talk:Mudazumo Naki Kaikaku +Then it must have been a mistake. TemiHill 02:40 5 April 2008 (UTC) +Also, if we were to accept the argument about calling it indecent exposure we would also have to replace the word 'kettled' in an earlier paragraph with a link to the page on Physical Assault as, if the accounts in the referenced Free Hetherington article are to be believed, this is what happened. (Note we shouldn't put such a link in because it is improper to accuse someone of a crime based on incomplete facts) +safavi Hi I was just wondering what do you think of this: The Safavids were an Iranian dynasty of Azerbaijani origin that ruled from 1501 to 1736, As intro for the safavi article? this version can put an end to the dispute and I think it is better than Turkic speaking specially in the intro. What do you think? thanks +If it's not clear, I do fully acknowledge that you two are right about my actions being inappropriate, but again Mike, please consider what I wrote above throughout this. +Denise Masino Now, I know that you're a bot and not a real person but anyway, you just can't remove sourced edits just because they are novel or something that doesn't otherwise fit your taste. +Water associations Why is this article in the category for sea and river gods? Not that I question the categorizationI have no knowledge of the subjectbut the reason should be explained in the article. +Thrown cat off of the cliff, not fake yeah, cause special effects were that good back then.... that cat was thrown off by some heartless person, like the heartless xtian germans who gassed the jews in the worst crime in human history imaginable, the holocaust.211.28.41.32 +A list of historical figures from a historical era is hardly contributing nothing. If you don't like lists, too bad. +Wikipedia blocks because of their paedo article If you go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_killer. You will see people and Wikipedia protecting a photo that shows a real underage girl (about 12) in bondage. However, Wikipedia blocks me and not the people who are protecting that photo. I guess that is how Wikipedia is. +Probably best not to, on second thought - I did originally copy it and switch things around, plus add a couple things. +":::::Here's hoping for good health for you and your family, especially given the approaching holiday season. uniquenames " +Ahmedinejad Please use only one account to revert. Thanks +it is true and where does it say i have to insert my references. so it is ok for you to add blog pages but i can add my facts to the story? what kind of sense is that? further more pornographic pages are not blog sites. your site is in violation of wikipedia rules......thank you...anoymous......bye sweetie +How do you explain this, this and this? — t +" Image Tagging Image:Richard photo.jpg This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:Richard photo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) " +Image:Parkins Valley.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parkins Valley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. — (talk) (Contr.) +" RfC Response Got here randomly from listing of RfCs on Community Page, but do have some academic background in sexual behavior. Have to say that aside from the first few paragraphs as I found them, which were good, this article is substantially tainted with junk and pseudo-science designed to legitimize or de-stigmatize male on female rape. Just because someone with initials after their name managed to get something published, or posted something on the net, does not make it good science. ""Encyclopedic"" should mean both ""known and recognized as good"" and ""comprehensive""; but ""known good"" should always trump ""comprehensive"". The vandalism (e.g. ""more pictures"") is also out of hand. There is also way too much plain and simple error (e.g. discussion of sex and aggression in other species falls in the realm of Comparative Psychology, not Sociology). I think you need to request major intervention by moderators on this topic. " +Let the flame war begin The title says it all. +" I would owe you a favor if you handled the ""Version number"" thread on this page. (Also, yes, definitely quite busy; just got some notes up for and .) " +4th/ August w0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000t I killed KQ and we got Dragon chain! w0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000t +Her nationality is certainly American, but her ethnicity appears to be Syrian. These are not incompatible. +Citation for you from MS Encarta, article “Poland” There is nothing like supposition about history of the “Recovered territories”. If you prefer you can check it in other encyclopaedia like “Britannica” or some other – neutral of course ) Good lack with studies. The Piast Dynasty Mieszko converted the Poles to Christianity in order to compete better with the crusading and marauding Germans. During the reign (992-1025) of his son, Boleslaw I, the Christian church was firmly established in Poland. Boleslaw also conducted successful wars against Holy Roman Emperor Henry II and considerably expanded the Polish domain. He was crowned king by the pope in 1025. At his death, Poland extended beyond the Karpaty Mountains (Carpathian Mountains) and the Odra and Dniester rivers. +" [[™]]whoever is the next person to write on this page has admitted to having aids and fellates aids monkeys non-stop. you can't edit my page. this is my user page and amounts to hypocrisy. the winner is user:Tbhotch, followed by user:Makecat so they have aids in China! Grats!! Now the black supremacist User:Malik Shabazz wants to get in on it. Well, monkeys and all" +I'm back from the ban cobi! Hey I'm back. Gonna vandalize all day and no one can stop me! As you can tell I can't be stopped by banning. I'll be seeing alo tof you and the rest of the blacklisted admins for the next couple of weeks =P 70.149.218.192 Dougbiznatch! +" Keep cool. -) Nothing it is going on. It is just wikipedia. I added the DU tons for the reader to make sense of the yearly use for U conversion (7000 tons/year) and where it does go after enrichment. I admit it may be overkill. By the way those plants are not ""U.S. weapons processing facilities"" (what ever that means). They are civilian enrichment plants operated for DoE by USEC. " +" Making the majority into the minority ""Though there has not been a claim of responsibility, previous bombings in Lahore have been blamed on the Pakistani Taliban because of their disagreement with minority interpretations of Islam, such as Sufism.[5]"" I would like to know when the Barelvis became a minority in Pakistan. It is the largest sect in Pakistan. Even the outdated CIA fact book can verify this. It seems that alJazera does not know what they are talking about. If anyone have a doubt about the connection between Barelvis and sufis, then simply read an article about Barelvis(which is insufficient and at parts incorrect - like many other articles here). They are sufis or they have a sufi master to whom they belong(speaking on the individual level). Personally I can tell you that for a Barelvi, sufis are considered our elderly; our wise sages who we seek for enlightenment and religious knowledge. Barelvi == Sufi more or less(to simplify things for the reader). People need to stop selling their propaganda and belittling the sufis. Barelvis usually call themselves ahle sunnah wal'jamat(this would be the international representative name barelvis refer themselves as - unlike in Pakistan and India due to complexities arising due to impostors). This is the largest sect in the Islamic world(no quotation - simply based on experience and personal research); where sufis are considered as mentioned, our elderly, our sages, our spiritual guides. Hence sufi's are not some sect, but simply our respectable elderly. The sect is called Ahle Sunnah wal'Jamat. An ok translation would be ""The people of the Sunnah"". Unlike Christianity, the right to claim of the true sect is of utmost importance for muslims due to Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w mentioning of the divide among us and that only one sect would be the truly guided one - which shall happen to be the largest one(from the hadith). Again seek out the source if you are interested. Its in the major Hadith collections. Hence quantity is an important question when it comes to pinpointing any discrepancy in this regard. Strictly speaking from an encyclopedic perspective, how can it be considered acceptable to disregard quantity ? If anyone doubts that most Pakistanis are sufis/barelvis/ahle sunnat wal'jamat. Then simply take a look at Sindh. I don't have the exact number, but its like 90-95 % sufis. Its only in NWFP that the majority are Wahabis. But that corresponds to ca. less than 10%(there are shia as well in NWFP and some other sects) of the total population in Pakistan(census 2010). How difficult is it for people to at least conduct their own research and try to separate truth from fallacy ?" +" I do not see how it is relevant if sources use the word famous. We are never obliged to use the same words as any source. You can find a source claiming that almost anything is famous - it's hardly a rare case where lots of sources do so - so should we describe everything as famous? No, I tried that and it was rightly shot down. You can find a source - a famous one! - which says that this opera is a shabby little shocker. And those words aren't even listed as ones to avoid, so do we use them as if they are objectively true? Obviously not. I don't believe the word is forbidden on Wikipedia, I already said that. But we have a guideline called ""words to avoid"". It doesn't say ""avoid these words, unless you really want to use them"", it doesn't say ""avoid these words unless you see them in external sources"", it says ""avoid these words, because they neither impart nor summarise verifiable information"". The guideline is very long established, and I see no sensible case for an exception here. 200.83.101.199 " +" That's trivial, for you are not blocked from those sites. As you knew, I meant the English wikipedia. It's a perfectly straightforward question, and your refusal to answer it with a simple ""yes"" or ""no"" suggests to me that Ann is probably right. " +yup, there it is in the paragraph third from the bottom .. well, there goes my credibility.... +" Claim in Introductory Paragraph about 15th-c. Greeting cards The source to which footnote 3 refers is a) not very reputable (howstuffworks.com? Comeon!) and b) it states that it ""legend has it"" that one (1) Valentine's card was sent..." +It's all better now. Thanks for all your help! +Message received; You're welcome, Viriditas; and, thank you for being thinking to protect my personal information. +Tony Sidaway The article Jim Nussle has been repeatedly vandalized for partisan purposes by right-wing Republicans, or rather one such Republican and his various sock puppets. Then this right wing goon of an admin intrudes himself. To state it mildly, I am apoplectically angry at the sonofabitch. To respond to your message Was your partial blanking of User talk:Tony Sidaway intentional, or an accident? [7]. MONGO I would seem to have been. +Here's a question Why is this page so blindly pro wikipedia. OH RIGHT. Hypocritical self righteousness ftw +Other changes There are three NIUs (NIUs are the cards inside of the two slot mounting cases, not the case themselves) in the first picture, not two. The single card in the left case looks to be either a HDSL or HDSL4 NIU. The left card in the left case is a HDSL2 NIU. More accurately, those are HTU-R (or H2TU-R or H4TU-R) cards, that terminates HDSL data and outputs a DS1 signal, functionally similar to older T1 NIU, but are not compatible with a T1 system. Explanatory information on variants (T1C (two concantenated T1s), etc. From a service provider to a customer, it would look something like [DSX-1}{ORB]3kft[RPTR]6kt[RPTR]...[NIU][CSU][DSU][CPE] showing the spacing between the office repeater in the office repeater bay (ORB) and the first line repeater as 3000 feet (3Kft) and spacing between subsequent repeaters as 6Kft. Emphasis (at least orginally) on T1 as being a span system. Designed as a short haul interoffice transport for use inside the telephone companies, and as part of T Carrier System linking two D1 channel banks: [D1 bank][DSX-1]X[DSX-1][ORB][RPTR]....[RPTR][ORB]DSX-1]X[DSX-1][D1 bank] Links to other (analog) carrier systems, showing T1 development in context. +" UCFD ""in..."" Perhaps the recent ""speedy close"" for Wikipedians in ___ should have been changed to the Wikipedians in ___ metropolitan area, since other cats are doing that. Just a thought. —Sig " +actually, I, too, am Esteban 'Steve' Espinola. Which is why I ended up using that as the name I edit under. Look under my name, I've done edits on numerous articles this week, since I joined up. Mmmmmbo had me over to the Biff Rose site, as I have written some music criticism. I went over to his website, and was surprised to find some lyrics that could only be construed as racist. I ordered a disk, from old, and got one from new, and it is quite clear the later years has been a hateful time for Rose. It's important not to let your own opinions ride through the entries, so I have added words such as detractors and critics, though Willmcw keeps adding niceties that make it seem as as if the whole of Rose's ouvre was happy go lucky. It is not, and so should be noted, this strange turn toward angry old man, with particular venom toward minorities. I have also noticed that this 'other' Steve Espinola has his own website linked to Biff Rose's and therefore is probably what you call on here, a sockpuppet. the connection between the 'other' Espinosa and Willmcw is not as clear, though they seem to communicate with some regularity. I hope all who read this will check out Rose's music, old and new and his mulittude of websites, because the answers are inside his words and web presence. In regards to email, I can email you form my earthlink account. It will identify me as Esteban 'Steve' Espinola. Ok. thanks +Number-ones pages No problem, it was a pleasure! By the way, why do you want to merge Ain't It Funny into Ain't It Funny (Murder Remix)? I mean, they're different singles. +" 2014 (UTC) So you like to review articles for DYK?(I am not asking for any) Asking because I have mostly seen you helping with the article, than reviewing them. (Talk) 08:47, 11 May" +" Sycophants "" Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:SummerPhD. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "" Please stop your crony bullshit. I didn't attack anyone - I just copypasted on his page what he posted here plus added FUCK OFF" +First off cool! thanks for making that! that's helpful. But you see, it illustrates my point bullet points are allowed to be jumpy and totally change topics every sentence, but paragraphs can't- they come of sound a tad schizoid, changing topics with each sentence. What you need to make paragraphs flow are topic sentences, concluding sentences, explainatory sentences. I could be done it's just not as easy as taking the text and deleteling the bullet points. That said, there is a prose form that would sound okay and would convey the same content that we could make if people really don't like the bullet points. I'll do some askin' ) +Nancy- you are a very sad person- let me have fun woman for the love of god, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Personal_lifeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee +" Oldafdfull I recently came across some AfD-debates that were closed by you. Good job on that! Although, perhaps it had be wise to consider using {{oldafdfull}} on the article's talkpage when the consensus is 'keep'.R " +" Ah yes, I forgot the subst. Thanks! Care to share? " +Trolling on the Holocaust Talk page Jpgordon: you are abusing your position as admin to troll and support troling on the Holocaust Talk page. Please desist.80.229.223.248 +" Excuse me? The message says, ""You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page"" All of that was done, so why is the message back on top?" +" my apologies Hello Anne, I left a correction over on the WP:RETENTION talkpage, but I wanted to say my sorry here as well. ""I wish to protest the role that 74 appears to be assigning to me here... Following another editor around and cleaning up his or her (deliberately left) messes would be boring"" I did not mean to speak of you now, I was specifically thinking of Anne Delong in December 2012. Although not yet replied on the talkpage, I'm currently reading through your first 500 edits, which make sense given your paragraphs in the Anne Phenomenon section. I absolutely disagree when you say following editors around and fixing their messes is boring. You worked on your own Opera article... and while it was waiting in the queue... made 15 grammar-nazi sniper-fixes to other articles in the queue. This was 2012-12-26 that I'm thinking of. You came back to wikipedia, every hour, for hours and hours. *That* is where you got addicted to wikipedia. *That* is why you still help out at AfC. In my oh-so-not-humble opinion, that day is the keystone which explains the Anne Delong Phenomenon. I want to re-create that day. Help me phrase my explanation on the WP:RETENTION talkpage, so that I capture what it is that brought you to love wikipedia. Hope this clarifies, and apologies for mischaracterizing your contributions now, when I should have been clear I was thinking of you back when you were just starting out. 74.192.84.101 " +"Just to put you in the picture, Trident13: the tone is nothing unusual for Dingley. He's got a long history. Being sarcastic/patronizing/abusive/contemptuous makes him feel good. He does it a lot. Funny thing is though, when he decides he's a victim of it he runs, crying like a toddler who's just dropped his ice-cream, to the ""notice board"", demanding people be banned. He's always telling others how to behave, but he doesn't think the rules apply to him. Self-esteem problems. He won't read WP:AGF, of course, because, as you've probably noticed, he already knows everything. Take no notice of the sad fucker. " +it seems they do officially but in practice it is a joke +Bold textStratford-upon-avon is old... +" Hello there, Anisha again. Here is the list of proposals I would like to do to improve this article for my Child Development course at King's University College. 1. Introduce Empirical Study Nancy Eisenberg, R. A. (1989). Relation of Sympathy and Personal Distress to Prosocial Behavior: A Multimethod Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55-64. 2. Add a Section to the article: ""Facial and Physiological Arousal"" 3. Expand/ elaborate on the ""Child Development"" section. 99.249.89.151 " +I've done my homework. I know what motivates the user in question. They are transparent to me. +MSU Interview Dear MisfitToys, My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students. So a few things about the interviews: Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes. Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.) All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so. All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time. The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly. Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name instead. If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you. Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you. Sincerely, Jonathan Obar +" Blocked To edit, please log in. Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may using an email address issued to you by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. | talk " +This has been one of my bugaboos too. But actually, both -tropin and -trophin are correct (and in common usage), since the releasing hormones have both tropic and trophic effects (the latter referring to releasing hormones promoting the growth of their target anterior pituitary cells). However, I agree with you that -tropic is preferred; most assays for releasing hormones measure their tropic rather than trophic effects. That goes for the -trophs or -tropes of the anterior pituitary as well; for example, gonadotropes is preferred over gonadotrophs. +other bands Mick Hurray was also in a great band called the Struggling Nobodys with his then wife, Teresa Hurray, brother Tom Hurray, and brother in law Keith McCormish!!! +" It's barely been up for 36 hours and Options 1 & 2 look awfully close to me ) Let's leave it a day or two longer? —  talk " +" I guess you didn't understand what I meant in my last message. I'll try to be more concise. The article needs a major rewrite. There is not one section posing a problem. The entire article is not written in an encyclopedic manner in a neutral tone. It presents one side as right and goes out of its way to prove it, and then gives a small section of ""criticism"" in a way that makes it seem as if the criticism is coming from a small group of people and is unfounded. " +" What ""drastic changes""? These are the only changes done by me (unreferenced templates). Please don't remove the template before it has expired. " +Kent Williams still considers himself to be a republican. And to user Q, Where are you from? +" E-mail I have not blocked you. You must be caught by an autoblock.— (竜龙) " +Award moved to award page +Street Fighter character articles mediation Hi, it's mr.bonus. I know you have edited a previous post of mine to remove the uncivil chat between me and Kung Fu Man but it needs to be logged that his behaviour has been, at times, antagonistic. My first point (which you edited) was a bit OTT for a mediation case (which I made hastilly in retalliation) but there are some things that need to be said as Kung Fu Man has been treating this debate as in the same vain as a forum argument. I have written a little along these lines and I would appreciate it if you would leave it as it is. You'll find that the comments I made are not disparagaring and are simply there to make the point. My comments are justified, as a quick comparison between my and Kung Fu Man's replies will show how he frequently posts in an un-called for antagonistic manner. On a lighter note, thank for your assistance in this debate. You've put a lot of time into it so far. +Contributions Taking a look at this users contributions, i've noticed he has only vandalised and made personal attacks. he has yet to make one useful contribution. going to keep an eye out oh him now. +MGS Peace Walker story Hey, I've put in a story section for the game, having progressed very far and I think it's not much of a blot unlike the atrocious one in MG Wiki. Feel free to tinker with it, but be wary of this Whitmore guy, that one has big issues against me. +Thanks it's fine. I meant ask the admin to unlock the article because I don't have anymore issues with it. +Much of the article text appears to have been copied straight out of the company's web page. http://www.johnsonelectric.com/about_us/company_overview.html Is this not a problem from copyright point of view? +Thanks; I've deleted two pages already! +Contested deletion This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It is promotional.) +. I will not engage in battleground attitude, personal attacks, long-term tendentious editing. I am willing to accept content and subject blocks as a condition that my block be lifted. +August 2011 Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Mr. Krabs. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +It deleted it and explained why these claims are wrong, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anti-Americanism#non-NPOV_about_Alternative_for_Germany +@ Good! Just tell me how delete my account so I can get away from you and 's harassment and abuse. You two have made a powerful and unstoppable enemy once I find who your identities are and if you even come to Washington state. I will destroy you guys' life once I find your identities and you know what I am strong and powerful than you and I am not vandalizing pages like everyone else is on this site, just doing what anyone would do. +If you remove this article OK, but still I doubt that you catch the most general aspect of curvature in the sense of Nomizu, Kulkarni and other modern writers. Look at the reference where you find more references. In the references there (look also that one in Lecture Notes in Mathematics) you find a decomposition of the space of all curvature structures in terms of Lie and Jordan algebras. And you find how elegantly electrodynamics and gravitational waves fit into the curvature play, look at the basic work of Lichnerowics. As an ,algebraiker' I like to write the curvature structure in the following triple form, generalizing the concept of Lie triples (the book of Otmar Loos is a nice generalization of Lie theory): [x,y,z]=R(x,y)z. This concept generalizes the notion of a Lie triple to that one of a curvature triple, where only the Jacobiidentity is missing, but a reference to the bilinear form <,> is added in such a way, that R(x,y) is an element of the pseudoorthogonal Lie algebra. Note that the complete work of Ricci, Einstein and Weyl can be summarized as a decomposition of the space of curvature structures of Levi type (for Lie algebras). All this shows, that we do not yet understand this curvature space completely. Especially the gravitational wave aspect needs clarification. Hannes Tilgner +Fixed with this edit it seems. ( talk) +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. g92contribs " +" Comment on Seregain Actually, I was never almost blocked for my behavior. If you'll read the past AN/I incident, a user (Coldplay Expert) proposed a malformed ""topic ban"" after the issue had already been resolved (which Jclemens corrected him on). He apologized afterwards In the past AFD, I addressed each of Seregain's allegations individually and proved that most of them were lies or misunderstandings, and also provided a series of links which show that he is a likely banned editor come back under a new screenname for the purpose of pushing an evangelical Christian POV (he has only 200 edits, his 1st of which was a well-formed AFD for Secular Student Alliance, and this is just the tip of the iceberg). Since Jclemens ended the dispute, Seregain's edits were never reviewed, but I'll be happy to bring them back up again. As for ""wikistalking"", Seregain linked to an offsite forum profile which he believed to be me and complained on Wikipedia for something said offline (personally I think he deserves an immediate ban for trying to ""out"" me on other sites, but I'll let the admins handle it). " +" Present Day Canada Government website incorrectly Titles BNA Act 1867 The Government of Canada (mainly Liberal since 1963) is very ""skilled"" at practising the Sin Of Omission as shown in the linked text below, British North America Act 1867 http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/c1867_e.html This website incorrectly refers to this document as the Constitution Act 1867, which is a misnomer, and a shameful one, indeed. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/endnts_e.html#(2) (2) As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982, which came into force on April 17, 1982. The section, as originally enacted, read as follows: 1. This Act may be cited as The British North America Act, 1867. I disagree with your interpretation. You're reading a footnote, which merely says that *originally* the 1867 act was to be cited as the British North America Act 1867. But, under the law since 1982, it is now to be cited as the Constitution Act 1867. All acts forming the constiution were retroactively renamed. Judicial decisions, and subsequent legislation, use this new naming system. This reflects the fact that these documents were not a part of a ""constitutition"" when originally created, since Canada had no consitution until 1982. Collectively, these acts were turned into a constitution, and hence renamed. What? ""Canada"" had no Constitution until 1982? You are completely wrong as well as per retroactive re-naming, that is not what happened at all. Please get your facts straight. " +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Leave me a message " +Lithuanian In Lithuanian language exist not only 'dirb-dav-ome' (we used to work, and means not only repeated action (many times!) in the past, but and prolonged action which was or was not repeated many times...and to emphasise this (that we and repeated this long action many times) we repeat twice this form using 'and' - 'dirbdavome ir dirbdavome' meaning 'we used to work long works and work endlessly'), but and 'dirb-ine-dav-ome' which is the derivation from 'dirb-ine-jome' (like in Finish - to work around or to work smth but not a real work or to work anything to spend your time or to work smth insignificant). +The TriBattery Pops edit you made was incorrect - please reverse Hi there. You edit of the TriBattery Pops due to copyright is incorrect and you should reverse it. CD Baby holds no copyright on the out of print Daily News article which was used by the TriBattery Pops with permission of its editor, Dawn Eden for multiple web quotes. In other words, the long out of print Daily News article is now a part of the TriBattery Pops promotion and you should not have simply deleted it. Please revise. For further confirmation, please contact the band, which is run as a benefit for children's scholarships at the Church Street School for Music and Art through a return email. To simply push through an edit like this without first checking with the author appears to be quite aggressive and is obviously unnecessary. +" Please apologize: you made a clear mistake. You are making a big mistake on Bitcoin: You removed my reliable source. THis is what you removed - including the reliable source - reliable as per Ladislav Mecir a very accomplised editor: Although bitcoin is not legally banned in terms of Russian law, it is in fact banned by the authorities on a de facto basis. On the other hand it is also true that there may be many millions of USD (it is a big economy) worth of bitcoins present today in Russia on computers owned by Russians since they bought them from and paid for them in Russian Roubles on exchanges accessible to them outside Russia - and that this practice most probably would continue with an equivalent increase in the number and value of bitcoins inside Russia. Please revert your false allegations against me including that I am attacking other editors: I have a reliable source: you simply state: ""Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article."" I had a source: it is in the Bitcoin article history for all to see. Please apologise and revert your false allegations immediatly. " +Thank you LOL. That's three so far. 1,2, and now this one. Thank you. I appreciate your taking the time to thank me. I already have an account ( +==Her Album Sales Hard Core has sold 2.2 million copies in US and over five million worldwide. The Notorious KIm hassold 1.5 million units since 2000. La Bella Mafia has sold 1.3 million units The Naked Truth has sold almost 400 thousand copies. You guys are constantly changing the article, my gosh, I don't know what to beleive +================================================================================================ You don't know me, but... that's not important right now. I'm harikari, a music article editor working against the evil overlord (oldman) Anger22 I just wanted to let you know that you are not alone. You will hear from me again someday. +" Gaza Reading List Christopher Hitchens, 'Bad Timing', Slate, 05/01/2009 Akiva Eldar, ‘Is an Israeli Jewish sense of victimization perpetuating the conflict with Palestinians?,’ Haaretz, 30/01/2009 Benny Morris, ‘Why Israel Feels Threatened,’ New York Times 29/12/2008 David Rose,'The Gaza Bombshell,' Vanity Fair, April 2008 Charles Glass,'The Ordeals of Gaza,' SOAS Lecture 22 Jan, 2009 Robert Fisk, 'Leaders lie, civilians die, and lessons of history are ignored,' The Independent 29 December 2008 Anthony H.Cordesman, ‘The War in Gaza: Tactical Gains or Strategic Defeat,’ Center for Strategic & International Studies, January 9,2009 Norman Finkelstein, ‘The Cleanser: Lobbyists Whistle Up Cordesman to ""Prove"" Israel Waged a Clean War in Gaza,’ Counterpunch, February 19, 2009 Henry Siegman, 'Israel’s Lies,' London Review of Books, 29 January 2009 John J. Mearsheimer 'Another War, Another Defeat,' The American Conservative, January 26, 2009 Richard Falk, ‘Winning and Losing in Gaza,’ The Nation, February 9, 2009. David Bromwich, 'Self-Deception and the Assault on Gaza', Huffington Post, January 16, 2009 Gideon Levy, 'The next step,’ Haaretz 24/01/2009 Avi Shlaim, 'How Israel brought Gaza to the brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ The Guardian, 07/01/2009 Tom Segev, 'Trying to 'teach Hamas a lesson' is fundamentally wrong,’ 29/12/2008 Tom Segev,’Peace Is No Longer in Sight,’ Washington Post, January 11, 2009 Tom Segev, ‘Cruel and meaningless wars,’ Haaretz, 23/01/2009 Eric Hobsbawm, 'On Gaza' , London Review of Books, 15/09/2009 Geoffrey Wheatcroft, 'How Israel gets away with murder,' The Independent, 11/01/2009 Gershom Gorenberg, 'The Ignored Choices in Gaza,’ The American Prospect, January 7, 2009 Norman Finkelstein, 'Foiling Another Palestinian ""Peace Offensive"",' Counterpunch January 28, 2009 Noam Chomsky Guillotining Gaza 07/30/07 Sergio Romano, 'Gaza. Chi ha iniziato e come giudicare la guerra,' Corriere della Sera, 09/01/2009 Shlomo Sand,‘David et Goliath ou le mythe historique inversé,’ Le Monde diplomatique, Février 2009 Stephen M.Walt, ‘What if Egypt, Jordan, and Syria had won the Six Day War?’, Foreign Policy, 01/04/2009 Timothy Garton Ash ‘Europe is failing two life and death tests. We must act together, now', The Guardian, Thursday 8 January 2009 Michael Walzer The Gaza War and Proportionality,’ Dissent, January 8, 2009 Seth Freedman, ‘A suffocating consensus of self-congratulation’, Guardian, 29 January 2009 Anthony H. Cordesman, ‘THE “GAZA WAR”: A Strategic Analysis,’ Center for Strategic & International Studies, February 2009 p.2 Michael Mandel, Self-Defense Against Peace, Counterpunch February 5, 2009 [http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ Sherifa Zuhur, 'Hamas and Israel:Conflicting Strategies of group-based +To RobertG I ask you to cancel your blockage that is completely unjustified and highly dishonest. I was ready fully to have a discussion on my article on the discussion page of Bosendorfer when you intervene to prevent me from publishing this article by blocking me indefinitely. I will complain of your shameful and despicable vandalism that is completely unjustified. I believe that you let your emotions take over your reason and it is now time to get back to reason. That is not all. You even blocked me from sending you messages on your talk page. How convenient?!! Be sure that I will contact the founders of Wikipedia and I will tell them the nightmare people have to go through just to write a less than one page article! For your information, there are millions of pages on products. See the page on iPod if you are not aware of this fact. Get back to reason. You have no facts whatsoever to justify your blockage!! Be sure I will follow the complaint procedure to have this blockage removed. Are you proud of your shameful behaviour of blocking me for no reasons? I am perfectly entitled to have my points of view on different people who intervened and to express these points of view. It is perfectly acceptable to have one's own points of view. Get back to reason. Your behaviour will be assessed by Wikipedia and will be found to be irrational. I was having a discussion on my article and Andrew Norman and you RobertG joined forces to prevent me from carrying on my open discussion on the Bosendorfer discussion page when I was fully entitled to do so only because you never wanted to see my article published. Again, get back to reason!! MichaelIsGreat +(You're welcome). That is a stretch. If the only reason the picture is featured is that it exists, it should be removed. How is the reader to know that we are showing this image because we think its existence somehow proves something about societal attitudes - and we don't even indicate what it proves. Also, we have no idea if that picture was hidden away for hundreds of years. The fact that it exists doesn't really prove anything. Images in the societal attitudes article should be about societal attutudes. +" I see you did open a discussion. Please disregard my edit summary. As for the criticisms ""woven throughout"" the article, it's actually better than having a Controversy section. That kind of section can never be balanced and usually serves as a troll magnet. Talk " +"::::: Thegoodlocust - you missed ""collect grant money"" from us so that they can shout (inform) us from our rooftops. Mk 71.228.77.211 " +Yes, I was planning on revising the spongebob article. Seems to me there's a few typos. +Has anyone got a photo, please? +Apologies for the stupid pointless bickering at WP:RD/H. I should have read your comments more closely. I guess I'm tired now. Sorry, Zain Ebrahim +Map I would like to see a map of europe before and after the treaty. +Expand scope of article Suggest that the article scope be expanded to include a discussion of human population dysgenics topics other than IQ, such as: Throughout our evolution, the weak and diseased died young and didn't pass on their genes. Now, because of modern medicine, people with numerous genetic diseases live long enough to reproduce and transmit defective genes to their children. (Examples: cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, diabetes, pyloric stenosis, various heart defects, thalassemia, phenylketonuria, and sickle cell anemia.) The incidence of many of these disorders is doubling or tripling each generation. No one would deny sufferers treatment, but it's important to realize that, as a result of it, our genetic potential for robust good health is declining. Life-long care will require ever-increasing expenditures. Furthermore, while sufferers are grateful for medical advances, most would nevertheless be quick to point out that the quality of their lives would be far better if they'd never inherited a disease in the first place. +I feel both qualify. +India quick links | talk +There appear to be some sourcing concerns, so some more established editors of this article may wish to comment as well. +I agree. I'll upload one from the Greatest Hits era. +you are the gayest person i have ever met +"==added Justice and Development Party== Turkey's AKP was added to the list due to the fact that ""social conservatism"" being listed as main ideology of AKP in the AKP Justice and Development Party English Wikipedia Page. " +"By ""all viable theories"" I mean any theory which purports to fit the published observations. For ""contending theories"" I am relying on multiple" +, 10 December 2009 (UTC) No kidding. Guys like ChrisO and Guererra (misspelled probably) are nothing but AGW activists. 20:35 +It would also make 2009 Giro d'Italia itself a featured topic. +" Sorry accidental. I'm still learnig to revert with rollback. talk " +"The airship hangar at Tillamook, Oregon has about 28,000 square meters of floor space making it about a third larger than the Tacoma dome and about ten times the size of the Great Buddha Hall. I believe the airship hangars at Tustin, California are of similar dimensions to Tillamook. They stand a thousand feet long, nearly 300 feet wide and nearly 200 feet tall, and inside it's all clear space. They are clearly buildingsthey have roofs and walls and are completely enclosed from the elementsand while they use metal fasteners they are of the sort of construction that most people think of as ""wooden"" so I can't think of a reason why one of them should not be listed as the largest wooden building. 70.172.201.34 " +Thank you -) I miss NZ but have much to do here. Will see you around. +Please refer to my responses here and here: I recommend that you direct your request to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. As I have not seen the film, it would be difficult for me to write a summary based on such a short review; in addition, the members of that WikiProject probably have more experience than I in writing plot summaries. '''''' +" I tried to fix the template mentioned above. The site doesn't work for me either, but luckily most of it was already cached by Google. There is a problem though: they seem to use a nonstandard transliteration. For example, the ж in Pozharevo is transliterated as ""j"", which doesn't appear as a valid transliteration in any of the systems used for the Romanization of Bulgarian (this is just an example familiar to me, there may be other nonstandard transliterations). Plus, there's the problem of the linking. For villages names that are found in both Bulgaria and other countries, I just appended "", Bulgaria"" to the title, but I'm not sure what to do with the ones that are all in Bulgaria, but in different oblasts. Should I append "", Province"" or just "", ""? " +Moore and the other teenager have openly criticized the boy. He showed up at K-Mart with the others and removed all bullets from the store, yet didn't get the point? I think he knew what he was doing, was ostracized for it, and then copped out of responsibility. Regardless, if you're going to include such opposite claims, proof is required (despite Delirium's paranoia that demand of proof or evidence is a liberal conspiracy - I guess science really can't be trusted [rolleyes]). The same will apply for the Moore quote if I can find it. AWF +Famous residents of Long Beach Wheely Willy, the celebrity Chihuaha, TV star and featured in How Willy Got His Wheels and How Willy Got His Wings +They don't in dictionaries. +" For a long time there was a large argument as to the fact that you can call her the best female chess player ever. I changed it to one of the best ever, somone changed it back. I changed it back and asked them to please do not revert it, and they left it that way for a long time. I don't feel it is neutral at all to call her the best ever, even if she propably is. On the list of notable male tennis players, we don'y have a not: Please note, these guys are better than like any of the top 100 female players, so you really can't compare between genders, unless one like gets in a car accident. We still haven't done that.  ►  " +. I'm really sorry and i wont do it any more. Im only 13 and my friend dared me to do it. +"You never gave a concrete answer. I asked when and WHY? What do you mean a ""Lefty tradition?"" What the hell does that mean? If you cannot give specific answers, then take" +" ""cannon or cannon bone: The area between the knee or hock and the fetlock joint, sometimes called the ""shin"" of the horse, though technically it is the metacarpal III."" ""fetlock: Sometimes called the ""ankle"" of the horse, though it is not the same skeletal structure as an ankle in humans. Known to anatomists as the metacarpophalangeal (front) or metatarsophalangeal (hind) joint; homologous to the ""ball"" of the foot or the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers in humans."" Currently, these are the worst of both worlds, to a layman reader. They include the old terms, without stating the reason for the misconception: that the hoof was a foot, therefore the fetlock was an ankle, etc. They include the new scientific terms, without explaining those or the new perception of the rear legs as having, to equate them to human ones, elongated feet and resting on a toe bone. " +You are a complete idiot. Please stop derailing discussion by closing off talk sections. Thanks. +My husband and I both have brown eyes. Our son has blue! It happens. +Sorry! Sorry that I didn't source my edit at first. It did look pig-headed not to do so. +" 2012 (UTC) Despite your ability to spot my OR, you chose to turn a blind eye to yours, talk about double standard that you've set for yourself. Enough, you're nothing but a troll and have stepped on too many toes here because of your constant double standard, I just wanna see how far you can go before you find out you are all alone in here. FWIW, I won't even comment when you get it because you are simply not worth anybody's attention or time anymore. ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 09:11, 1 April" +See Image:File:Button nowiki symbol.png. +" Equality Mississippi Actually, I have put it past an admin about having the page protected. He couldn't as he was involved. If you want to protect the page for 72 hours or so while the ANI and talk page discussions reach consensus, PLEASE do so. It would save me an Aleve. - • Talk • " +If it wasnt murder than what was it? +Other Planets Oh yeah. its in there. heres a sample.....all referenced. All verifiable Other Planets Meher Baba asserted that there are other planets besides earth where living beings exist.[97]. However he emphatically stated that God can only be realized on this earth. [98]. jai 122.109.196.213 +Image Added image of map, it would be really nice if someone could add an image of the park. I might get around to it. +for my troubles i am actualyy a girl!!!!! +Aditya Srivastava आदित्य श्रीवास्तव Born 24 oct 1997 (age 17) gorakhpur, India Residence Goregaon, Mumbai, India Nationality Indian Occupation Actor, hacker Years active 1997–present Known for His idiot way love. Once a time he was in love with a girl who is best friend . Due to some reason the girls her, after he fells that he was in love with her. Infact he wants to tell about this to girl , but these girl cann't be ready to hear any thing from him. +I'm lysy. Bonaparte was my Romanian friend but he god blocked by Mikkalai. I'm from Poland. Noroc. +where is your source stating it is an aftershock? The fact, that it has ocurred after the first earthquake doen't mean it is an aftershock. Many laymen would call any event after a bigger one an aftershock, but the difference relies on the characteristics of the events. +This is not spam. Your unsubstantiated and unwarranted accusation doesn't make it so. No Ipse dixit here. You are entitled to you opinion, but you happen to be wrong. Stan +" Oh! Shoot. Please forgive my ignorance. Talk Contribs " +Getting Fat He needs to lose the excess weight. No wonder Katie Lea kicked the shit out of him. 68.54.163.153 +hey where the fuck did the rolling earthquake nickname come from i havent ever heard tht 68.54.17.228 +" You can drag out the diff if you want: the disclosure is just above. Here it is for the third time: ""Oppose the move and continue to reiterate my earlier close with the consensus. The naming policy clearly states that the names Wikipedia uses for articles are those most commonly used. The MOS is subsidiary to the policy. If there are many other articles with ndash, that is not a reason to make this article also match, but a reason to rename those articles to match the common name, rather than trying to make the title look the best. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 6:54 pm, 16 March 2011, last Wednesday (4 days ago) (UTC+11)"". It's a reverse disclosure that demonstrates beyond doubt that he was conflicted when he carried out the admin action. Do you have a logical problem with this? (talk) " +" Thor (Marvel Comics) An editor other than me has reverted your inappopriate edits in the ""Publication history"" section. Please do not continue to edit this section in a manner contrary to other pub hist sections all throughout the Comics Project. " +note to self: harassment, acknowledged trespassing. - +" RE: Notice of edit warring policy I'm not trying to start an editing war. I just updated/corrected some pages and User:Neutralhomer started changing them back. So HE was the one that started the editing war. As for the ""unsourced changes"", if it's possible, I can send you or User:Neutralhomer photographic proof that what my edits are correct." +6 months later and it has not been merged so I am going to remove the merge template and begin a copy-edit. +" Since she does have controversial statements on race, including that bit on aboriginals, we should leave it under controversies or risk loosing WP:NEUTRAL. If you want to move the part about how well she was received by the black community I agree that it belongs in the ""life"" section.  ☎ " +I'm sure there are. But whoever put this video together should already have the individual frames, right? +" Samplers http://www.greendaydiscography.com/samplers.html Dookie (sampler) Singles Rock block sampler Pop disaster tour 2002 Breakfast with Green Day " +" As someone said in the Vallage SPAR shop - ""I don't want any more of those old rich people moving here and making me feel even more poor than I am!"" === (talk) " +Oh is it a vote we are agreeing on or on the content ? And where did I say that documnetries shouldn't include on filmographies? If so I would blank the whole section, YES? Don't try to twist please. All I'm saying is this Documentry is not about Kapoor and she has no direct involvement towards this, just only because being the reason she had been interviewed for it, this shouldn't be included on the list. I hope I'm clear on my point. Anyone please comment after watching the Documentry to say I'm wrong with your point, so we can end this topic. +|Peuiysex's user talk page +"It seems to me as well that there is no actual ""Hipster subculture"". ""Hipster"" is an insult if anything. The article should be framed appropriately or not exist at all. 64.252.251.77 " +"""This is the last time I am going remove junk from here. After this I will get blocking"" those were his exact words if you look at the editing history on Nov 16.Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on" +Hi It has come to my attention, that you are an ugly fat piece of shit. Lose weight fatty. +Please, check. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prototype_filter&action;=historysubmit&diff;=437083245&oldid;=389531293 77.229.126.143 +Please don't revert my edits, this is your last warning. Thank you. +Re: an old afd Yes I support another afd for list of Jewish historians. It's just anti-semitic listcruft, and I think sufficient time has elapsed between the last one and now. Graham/pianoman87 talk +I had reblocked you without changing the time period, removing your ability to edit this page based on your abuse of that privilege seen in your last edit, but then looked at the edit you were blocked for and have now reblocked you indefinitely. Frankly, I would have indefinitely blocked you based on the first edit alone and now, with both, your intent is plain. +This line has now been removed, I saw no problem changing it to read 'It claims it is the healthiest breakfast cereal for kids'. 20:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) +An automatic system that detects humidity is an improvement, but there are also those other factors, like turning into the sunlight or shadows. Leaving the fan on might well be an improvement, too, since there are times when A/C plus fan feels too cold but turning both off feels too hot. Having just the fan on might be better, at least for a few minutes. +Fuck you, you fuckin' anti-wikipedia collaborator. You are stomping on my HUMAN RIGHTS to edit WIKIPEDIA, cocksucker. +Your DO know that Hispanics are part of Europeoid race, don't you? Aparently you don't. Damn racist! Your beloved John Wayne +" Added a new section called 'partially recognised territories' or something like that. Cyprus and Kosovo are the only ones in there. It seems to have quieted the many critics and drive-by edits to the page. Cheers. • T/C " +" LOL! I am not sure anybody wants to get involved in that one. The topic banned editor [User:Andreasgde] came up with a temp. solution of avoiding the usage of ""The/the Beatles"" midsentence and that apparently resolved most of the issue since 2011, until I stumbled into it and asked too many questions before somebody gave me some links and kicks. It would seem the hundreds of articles concerning The Beatles group, the Beatles members, albums, and compositions, use the syntax I just used. [User:GabeMC] wants to start changing all ocurrences to ""the Beatles"" mid sentence with his Straw Poll. When editors disagree he gets nasty with ridicule, argumentative and posts snipes on user talk pages. His argument is that each article can ignore WP:MOSTM on it's own consensus and only war in two or three articles, so far, on this issue. Trouble is there is no consistency in trademark usage, old documents, WP:MOS vs. WP:MOSTM, English grammar, or editor ideas that prevails with capitals or not. My concept appears to prevail in a few dozen articlesI have read. The issue has never been resolved due to behavioural issues induced into every discussion and a lack of Arbitated Policy continues the randon edits. Even it my mentioned method succeeds think of the rogue editor seeing this, ""When all the Beatles played together The Beatles made good music."" I am only concerned with the unaddressed behaviour of this and a few other editors in these discussions. Nobody seems to want to take them on. Some agreed that a ""shot across the bow"" may be in order. Funny thing; all of the editors agree an arbitrated decision is needed but won't muzzle themselves long enough to draw serious attention. The mud slinging is unbeliveable and admins have told them to ""grow the fuck up"" and other less rude demands. It would seem all five or six GabeMc supporters consistently spell Andreasegde's name incorrectly despite a dozen corrections I have witnessed. That and the behaviour technique seem too coincidental, to me. Man, I hate this stuff! I just can't believe this is happening on WP with all these rules and tough nuts. ) 99.251.125.65 " +My Picture 68.248.73.3 +This article is basically under attack by multiple POV editors, this has not changed, the article is subject to edits that are valueless to anything at all to the reader or to the neutrality reputation of the wkipedia, one revert is more than this article is worth, keep it locked, delete it it is a attack pov article, do the wikipedia a favour keep it locked. +It was a planned fight according to Dana White not rumors. You were still wrong about Lesnar vs Carwin. So you do not win anything. Allstar13 Wins Paralympiakos Loses at life in general and Notice how I don't delete your post, but you have deleted my multiple times. +List of UEFA club tournament winning managers Hi Peanut, just wondered if you could spare five minutes (or more!) reviewing the above, it's sat at FLC for several days no without comment and I'd like to push it on a bit. Hope you're having a good Easter, all the best, +":Please refrain from removing the pictures from Depictions of Muhammad and including your own pious point-of-view. As an encyclopedia for all people from all parts of the world and of all religions, we cannot tailor articles to one point-of-view. Your edits to Depictions of Muhammad comprimised that goal as it promoted a Muslim, anti-aniconism bias. Thanks in advance. e " +(UTC) Nononono. In the USA, graham flour = whole wheat PASTRY flour. Whole wheat flour and graham flour are not the same. Pastry flour is more finely milled (somewhere between cake flour and all purpose flour), is unbleached, and is between cake flour and all purpose for protein content (around 8% or 9%). Graham flour is all that, plus it's whole wheat (has not had all the bran etc removed).66.57.60.99 18:24, 23 March 2012 +I decided to put this message here since you had nothing in your User Talk page... User_talk:Typhoonchaser +YOUR VERY DEEPLY OFFENDED! man you sound like a blow-jobbin' old lady. In fact you are a homosexual blow-jobbin' old lady! +(or candidacy for same) +Your edit to Robert Boyle +fair enough, i will be checking on progress and expect it to develop at a fast rate +Gay sexual practices Please, read the talk page to the entry. There's a consensus among all editors who have weighed in on the subject that the 'health risks' subsections need to be trimmed down to respect Wikipedia's Undue weight policies. All I did was that, besides adding content and sources to the main subsection, which you removed. +Thank you ScottyBerg, much appreciated. I've tried properly tagging this article for outside opinions several times and its the darndest thing, someone keeps deleting them without allowing outside opinions to burst his little bubble. Thank you for your help. +IEEE Conferences IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) -New York based & Institution of Electrical Engineers (US based) are different and merger not required. +" Congratulations! You'll be a great admin. I love the comment on your userpage about how easy and streamlined it is to screw things up now. That's absolutely correct. My cat (who spends way too much time lounging around the keyboard) rolled back someone's edit when she stepped on the laptop's touchpad. Fortunately, it was an eminently rollback-able piece of vandalism, anyway. I no longer allow the cursor to sit parked on the ""rollback"" button while I peruse. OK, enough rambling. Congrats again! 10:57, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)" +" I am encouraged by your feedback. Let me clear it up a bit first: my version is written basically with Paul Graham's article on this topic in my mind. I think that article is neither an undue appraisal nor an unfair dismissal of the term, and I think it would be a good and neutral starting point for me when I re-write the lead. According to that article, Web 2.0 can be boiled down into three things: democracy, Ajax, and focus on user. This is how I structure the lead sentence: democracy (ie architecture of participation in Tim O'Reilly's words, and folksonomy in realisation) and user focus in the first part, and better UI powered with Ajax in the second. Specific replies as follows: lengthy list: agree, although the current version also features a long list as well. Perhaps we can break down that clause into two, like this: ... that put emphasis on allowing users to share and collaborate information online in new ways as part of the service, presented in a user-friendly, interactive, and often Ajax-enabled, user interface. ""collaborate information"": my wrong. Let's preserve the order in the current version, ie ""collaborate and share information"". folksonomy: see my point re: democracy and architecture of participation above. I do believe that this is an important feature that distinguish Web 2.0 from the old: a platform, built-in as part of the service, that allows users to actively contribute to the grouping and ranking of contents. You won't have that pre-Web 2.0. Even the readers' ranking at Amazon.com was initially a secondary feature. cluttering the lead: please see if the revised version above would make it better presented. And as I have mentioned above, the original version suffers from the same problem as well. focus on what web 2.0 is: I believe this is what I am doing with the revised version. The current version simply mentions too much of O'Reilly Media, but the term has evolved far beyond their reach and control. And I do believe the revised version does sufficiently address the fact that it has become a buzzword in the marketing sense. " +You should be advised that I have left my comments in the KaintheScion/ElKabong RFAr. You should also be advised that I have yet to be convinced that these two are actually sockpuppets. I further object to being named in this RFAr at all, as it is an obvious indication to me that the whole thing has been enacted in bad faith by a group of editors pushing a political agenda. That you did so without so much as sending me a message or an email is very bad form on your part. +Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. 83 +" These all seem to be reasonable solutions, if a little stop-gappy. I think my problem is that I am seeing this as an outsider to this UK group and the UK group might be seeing the article as a group of insiders writing for insiders. My initial problem with the article was that it is unclear and allows different incompatible readings. ""Administrative geography"" certainly makes the article more consistent, but I'm not sure it makes the title more understandable (unless, of course, you are a geographer or know all the branches of geography). To benefit neophytes (perhaps I presume too much in thinking this is the intended audience of wikipedia and any other encyclopedia articles) on the subject which this article addresses, I would make the following suggestions. 1) Gut as much of the introduction as possible regarding the four countries and, instead, refer people to that article (since it already exists; which would also resolve some problems people have with repetition between these two articles. 2) Explain what ""administrative geography"" addresses (e.g., national and local government hierarchies) and how this relates to this article. 3) For the love of God, rename (to whatever is appropriate) the section entitled ""In the UK"" (or eliminate this title) because it serves no purpose whatsoeverperhaps to ""contemporary administration"" or something that transitions from ""History""; although for reasons beyond my comprehension, some people are apparently wedded till death to that vacuous phrase (i.e., In the UK). 4) Move the last paragraph of the Intro (beginning with ""Historically..."") to the History section or exapnd on the themes it introduces. 5) Identify the referent of ""This structure"" in the History section (i.e., answer the question, ""What structure?""). 6) Follow strict style guidelines for the terms ""division[s]"" and ""subdivision[s]"" throughout this article if either is a significant concept for this article. 7) Incorporate the ""Parliamentary representation"" section into the section preceding it. This would give a structure of [Introduction], History, Contemporary Administration (or whatever), Informal (Sub)Divisions, International (Sub)Divisions. As things stand, having a separate section for informal divisions suggests the rest of the article is about formal divisions, which would be fine if the sections reflected a more transparent and sensible organization to the article currently lacking. " +When there is a current Rfc - about which both of you are obviously aware - trying to start a different discussion on another page could be considered forum shopping and may be deemed to be [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive editing. +How many time are you going to try to block me before you realize that you actually can't do shit about it ? I might not know about your Unfair Wikipedia rules but I know about computers... I also know how tracing IP and changing them. So Mister Jimbo, your friends did not give a damn about asking them to step back and asking them for leniancy ? I will contribute to Wikipedia my way and as you will find out, there is so little you will be able to do about it. This will end in court. Now don't forget to block this IP and to read your stupid and unfair statute and which one to apply here. Bbb23, we'll have a talk someday but out of Wikipedia where I can teach you my personal rules about respect. It's never a good thing to fuck with me. +I am Gabe's BOOGIE MAN !! +" Apparently, the article actually was not ever properly nominated for deletion, so noone ever closed the ""Vfd"", because the link had only been posted on the article, please see WP:VFD#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion. Step III is somewhat important. (talk) " +Why do not the two of you, the mentally retarded Jennygirl and the omnipotent Richie Rich, go together to Harrods and dont forget to choose together, being an authentically healthy and sociable couple, time and location, maybe a restaurant,and then enjoy very evidentliy your meal and in case you should discover that you cant pay anymore, then do not expect them to let one of you peel the potatoes in return. Maybe they wont even say Hello when you come back after they would be kicking off your dipshit spinning incapable ass from the central perk. What a pitty. You have all of my sympathy on your side. Enjoy yourselves and your longest sentence Johnny-come-lately programme director. +" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (50.17.37.187) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! (Hit) " +That complaint has nothing to do with what we are discussing here. +" Compensation I believe that the compensation section should include details about whether the compensation mentioned is per month or annual and it should also mention the source. I am unable to find the info so the person who first created the section, please help! ""Vajpayee remains PM till new pm is asked to form a government"" is this accurate? All the news stories I saw said that Vajpayee resigned immediately and his resignation was accepted by the president. This is not possible.- e He did in fact resign, and the president did accept it. However, as is custom, the president asked him to ""continue in office til alternative arrangements are made"". (The Hindu) http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/holnus/001200405140111.htm Was Manmohan Singh sworn-in on the 19th, or did he merely become the 'designate'? I have not seen anything saying he IS now PM. 18:46, May 20, 2004 (UTC) How about this? The article quite unequivocally states that Abdul Kalam appointed Singh PM. Is it a technical point that he is PM only after he's been sworn in? | Talk To summarise the entire process, once the election results in India are declared, the President has the prerogative to invite any person (by convention - the elected leader of the single largest party/coalition. Note again - the chosen leader of the party does not have to be a member of the parliament, as yet.) to form the government. Please note that invitation is not equal to appointment. If it is clear that the ruling party is getting the boot, the Prime Minister formally submits his resignation to the President, who advises him to stay in power until alternate arrangements are made. Technically, the new Prime Minister takes charge the moment the oath to the office of the Prime Minister and the oath to safeguard official secrecy are adminsitered. In case of disputed numbers, the elected government must prove its majority on the parliament hall by tabling a confidence motion, within a stipulated period. And if the leader is unelected, he/she is required to get elected from either houses of parliament within six months. The case of the Parliament is a little more curious. The parliament is born on the day of its first session, when the individual members are sworn in. So technically, as on date, India has a government without a parliament. It would continue to remain so, until June 2, when the monsoon session convenes. 13:37, May 27, 2004 (UTC) Thanks, , for the clarification. | Talk First non-Hindu? The article currently states that Manmohan Singh is the first non-Hindu to be PM. I know that a number of newspaper articles have been repeating this, but I think it's wrong (or at least disputable) in that Rajiv Gandhi was a Parsee. At any rate, his father Feroze Gandhi was half-Muslim and half-Parsee, and if I'm not mistaken Zoroastrianism was the religion passed down to Rajiv and Sanjay (not that anybody in the family is exactly religious!). 00:14, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC) Guest Book on website of PM India Guest Book on website of http://www.pmindia.nic.in is not working for last two years. Similarly write to the PM India in 500 characters should be increased to 1500 characters. Please use this page for discussing the article only. Broken links for guest book should be reported to the site-master of pmindia.nic.in website, not to this page. Word limit of write to PM is also irrelevent to the article's discussion. — (talk) Powerful person PM of super Power India I have informed the Government of Pakistan for help and to maintain the Guest Book of PM of India as the same is not possible from Indian Engineers. 8< The I in Congress(I) does not stand for Indira. I think it stands for ""Indicate"". When Indira split the congress, hers was the breakaway faction. So what later became Congress(O - o for organisation) was the Congress. Indira's faction had to ""indicate"" itself and hence Congress(Indicate). Later since she wrested co +" Actually, the distinction needs to be made. As both of you have shown a distinct preference for dogmatic editing, I suppose that distinction is not clear to you, but it is a an important one. " +Vandalism Eww ur gay lol. +Image:MahaVishnu.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MahaVishnu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +" all but the glyph section could be truncated with, as far as I can see, equal justification in the way that you suggest -MY GOD, HE'S SEEN THE LIGHT. No, all jokes aside, making the philosophical implications of three-ness a major point of the article is only inviting me to come along and argue with you. My religion and natural philosophy is centered around the number five, which means you're wrong. I know you're wrong because I am a priest (and a docktor) who has spent much time studying the mystickal properties of the number 5 and how it relates the to number 3 (and the number 2 - this is very important). I think overall my philosophy overall has as much merit as that of Mr. Pierce. Whether you interpret that as praise towards me or an insult towards the late C.S. is entirely up to you. But ultimately neither have a place on this page. Now, if you asked me, a list of stories with the number three in the title also doesn't belong here. Maybe on the disambig page - ""3 can mean.... literature: The Three Little Pigs, The Three Bears, Three Blind Mice, etc."" Three Bears is a popular Russian chocolate candy, do we include that here as well? I can see how cases where the numeral 3 is used in common classification systems - such as the periodic table, or even positions in sports (the first baseman is literally referred to as ""3"" in phrases such as ""4-6-3 double play""), but things like ""three witches in macbeth"" seem much more eehhhhhhhh. maybe this is an issue to be argued with the whole wikinumbers project. i only have issue with this page because when i stumbled on it some 10 months ago it actually had A COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS AMOUNT of unnecessary, marginally significant, and horribly formatted content, and I actually want this website to be good and useful instead of a godawful pile of crap. SORRY FOR THE O/T but that's what happens when you get me going (I apologize in advance for certain individuals who are too sensitive to hear the truth) " +Thank you for considering the suggestion. This is a genuine issue and it can be verified from parliamentary and other records. +Jack and Jill Hey jackass, don't protect that page. You are taking the fun all out of it. Jack and Jill went up a hill Each with a buck and a quarter Jill came down with two fifty oh what a whore!!! Alan, who knew your momma was named Jill? OK, I am off to vandalise something else. Catch me if you can! +Ok thanks, I didn't know. +NO doubt. ) I get irritated at article POV pushing and in the talk page I don't mind letting my opinion be known. Thanks for the check. I will keep my opinion OUT of the article. 68.41.80.161 +Thanks for your welcome    Thanks for welcoming me to the English Wikipedia. Your was awesome! I am a regular user of Spanish Wikipedia and Commons, but I come here from time to time to write some interwiki links. Sorry, I have to go back to combat vandalism. See you! +" I notice that you turned down my AIV report on this user as ""stale"". Whilst I have no beef with your decision, how was it stale?? User was warned a number of times on 16th/17th about messing around with talk pages. User wrongly archived User talk:RogueNinja at 06:09 today. Final warning at 06:57 today User repeated the behaviour that was the subject of the final warning at 07:55 today Reverted and AIV reported at 09:05 today" +Big boned reference should be made to the controversy of someone who is big boned being an advocate of health +I'll just wait til my IP address changes in a few days. Then I'll be able to insert all the opinions I want. You do noble things here. Whether or not you were trying to make a friend, you've made one in me, Rhobite. Would it be against Wiki's NPOV policy to say I love you? +I've seen many versions of his famous line but which one is the most accurate translation? +"== 8 Focused vs. 8 Flexible (8B) == I added a ""citation needed"" to the assertion that the 8B degree is often for students who don't want to go onto physics graduate programs I've known a good number of 8B majors who are pursuing physics PhD's. Generally people pursue 8B when they don't want to take an extra experimental class and write a thesis. " +Roger Cohen and Iran nuclear program Roger Cohen clearly supports Iran's nuclear program. Read this column:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/opinion/13iht-edcohen.html +" ""Dr Suess"" tag what about cat in the hat or fox in socks?" +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Alloy steel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  444  " +" Riverview, Ottawa I had a feeling you'd revert me today, though not on this page. I will deal with them in the order I saw them. 1. Lycée Claudel: You are 100% correct. I realized it five minutes later, when comparing the Elections Canada map of Ottawa South to those of Capital Ward and Alta Vista Ward. Good revert. 2. Chinese (Cantonese, Mandarin, etc.): What exactly *is* ""etc.""? You give no references whatsoever, and your use of the phrase ""sole mother tongue"" is confusing. Do you mean ""language that this person first learned at home in childhood and still understands""? Listing the top 2 Chinese topolects by name while the rest have to settle for ""etc."" is imprecise, and doesn't do nearly as much for the reader as would a simple link to Varieties of Chinese. That said, I will concede that ""Chinese (not otherwise specified)"" correlates to only one bit of your 4%. If you're being reasonable, you will concede that with no refs, nobody can reasonably check. So...let's call that one a good revert to a bad version. Let's see some refs! " +"Redirect? 03:40, August 14, 2005 (UTC)" +On second thought, go ahead and delete it Cyrus would probably welcome being free from having to maintain eternal vandal vigilance on the article. +The Christafari group has very legit sources. I think that you are being way too prejudice simply because they're a Christian group. So far all I see is an anti-Christian agenda to try and make it seem like Marley would never give up the Rasta. Lets be fair with the sources and not pick at the people providing them. Marley died a Christian, not a Rasta. +" Jezhotwells, you appear partisan in starting an edit-war. My correction is well sourced, while yours and Eisfbnore's are by now ""patent nonsense"". You should yourself read and use the ""talk-page"" instead of deleting, it seems. " +Opinions delivered Here and in that case my perception is available, which may interest you to take a look. +General info on U2 It would be great to add a section of U2's characteristics that sets them apart from most bands. For example, I hear that they have always owned 100% of the rights to all of their music (instead of the record companies). Also, they rarely ever allow sampling of their songs and they are very careful with allowing their songs to be used in advertisements. If I have time I might see if I can find more concrete information, and I'll include it in the article. +I will be back to abuse you later. ta ta for now D +Neologism It certainly qualifies as a neologism, but I dont have time or interest to research who actually coined it. That needs to be added. -|t 4 July 2005 19:34 (UTC) +You need to erase from your heads that any of these egyptians are going to be in some Arabs picture box, because they will always always be deleted. It's not the problem of the Egyptians that they are accomplished with nobel prizes and you can't find Arabs who are. It's time for you to leave the hell alone. +lol.. were you a hall monitor in high school..lol - +":::::Not fake policies, I will invite others to check out recent changes since they are somewhat large. If you accuse me of canvassing I will take that as harassment since I have been through this multiple times with you. (talk) " +" Rebbe as Moshiach section historicly innacurate ""During these appearances his followers would chant, what would come to be a very controversial ""mantra"" among the Lubavitchers Yechi Adonenu Moreinu v'Rabbeinu Melech Hamoshiach l'olam voed! - ""Long live our Master our Teacher and our Rabbi King Messiah forever and ever!"" When sung before him in has last months, Schneerson evidently vigorously encouraged the singing by swaying to and fro and swinging his hand, as he had done at the numerous farbrengens over the years. From this and his previous public statements his followers ""extrapolated"" that he acceded to their wish that he be the ""Messiah"". But that moment never arrived, as he died unable to verbalize and say anything to confirm his followers' longed-for dream that he be the actual long-promised Jewish Messiah. "" 1)The Rebbe encouraged public singing of Yechi Adonenu Moreinu v'Rabbeinu Melech Hamoshiach l'olam voed! - ""Long live our Master our Teacher and our Rabbi King Messiah forever and ever!"" as early as 15th of Yiar 5751 (29th of April 1991) almost a year before his 1st stroke see this video clip for example: http://video.moshiach.ru/events/first-yechi.rm in it you can clearly see Chassidim singing Yechi and the Rebbe encouraging them in Yidish to sing it once more. beyond that look at this clip again before the Rebbe's stroke Mrs Chavah Cohen is giving the Rebbe tambourine with ""Yechi"" writen on it the Rebbe gives her a blessing http://video.moshiach.ru/events/yechi-tambourine.rm" +Please suggest replacement template Hi. You recently participated in a template deletion discussion which resulted in the deletion of a template, Template:OtherusesSubtopicAlias, used at the top of the article Positive airway pressure. The deletion discussion did not mention which template should be used as a replacement. I can't even see what the text was that was formerly at the top of the article as created by the template. Could you please suggest an alternate template to use at the top of this article? (I'm also posting this request to the talk pages of others involved in the deletion discussion.) +Jeff Noble is erasing any information about Dr. Schmidt because he is jealous of him because Jeff will never know what it is like to march in a drumcorps or to play a trumpet. Jeff has no life, his wife left him, so now he cyber stalks people and tells lies about them.69.246.133.105 +his is a weast of time so fuck yal +" Faith healing You or someone using this IP address recently (diff) insisted on the insertion of irrelevant information to the New Thought section of the Faith healing article. While the fact of different sub-sects is undeniable, I have yet to find or be offered any indication that their approach to the topic at hand differs in any material manner. There already is a link to the relevant article for those interested in New Thought itself rather than simply its approach to faith healing. While everyone is welcome to edit Wikipedia, please in the future confine your edits to those which further the encyclopedic endeavor rather than advertising for a particular movement, and discuss any controversial changes on the relevant talk page. This is accessible by clicking the ""discussion"" link on every article. You may also wish to consider creating an account to facilitate communication. You can also create a WatchList to be automatically notified of changes to your favorite articles when you login. ~(s)talk~ " +Nice meeting you. Hi. I have noticed that you almost never reply on your talk page. Perhaps you are a software? A very clever software indeed. Most likely made by Opal Koboi. Aurum est potestas- Gold is power. ( ) +Done a complete rewrite of the article, excluding the History section. I've added quite a bit of new content, referenced most of the article, moved opinionated content to separate section, fixed up errors and cleaned up the style. +" Thanks for the heads up but have already reported you at 3RR here (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) " +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Epic, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:FisherQueenmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (talk · contribs) " +Yes, you are right. The thing being measured is real value. +" Bizbdnews not a reliable source The source for nearly the entire article is bizbdnews.com. I can't find the organization on any list of accredited media in Bangladesh. It describes itself as owned and edited by Rashidul Hasan Bulbul, who is also the registrant for the website. I can't find any record of him working in journalism. Bizbdnews advertizes for unpaid volunteer contributors, roughly translated: ""Young, budding writers who are looking to play online or on the Internet, looking for a platform to express themselves ... the following qualifications would be required: 1. Know how to type on the computer. 2. Have a general idea of what to write on the subject. 3. Must have an interest in writing and learning."" These are not the hallmarks of a professional source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Bizbdnews's English language content is largely republished press releases and agency reports, with the balance being self-published/user-generated. The cited bizbdnews.com article does not fit Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source, and should not be used. " +It does not look like vandalism as Wikipedia defines it (a deliberate attempt to compromise Wikipedia); it looks like a content dispute. I gather from the talk page that prior consensus was to remove that material, but as consensus can change, the specifics of that paragraph should be discussed to see if consensus still stands. Dispute resolution can be pursued as necessary. (talk) +Hola ,mi llamo Holli and this is my wiki im new to wiki and don't really know what the.... ummm never mind I'm supposed to do and how to do it! so as you can see I'm probably screwed! ? -holli1213 . . 1-4-10 ~ +" brainhell Thanks Robert. I signed my comment with four tildes, at least the one that appeared on my own page. I apologize if I posted it elsewhere in the wrong pace, or without a signature. I see that Lucky 6.9's user page now says only ""Vacation time..."" and displays a stress meter. His user talk page says ""Wikistress is building. I, therefore, have left the building for a brief time."" I see no acknowledgment that he realizes that he lost his temper. This in your inference. But even were that true, and despite his apology to me, and his promise not to delete my posts (without addressing what he'll do to the posts of others), he has shown himself temperamentally unsuited to administrate. It's quite likely to happen again. I respect your view that ""I think that would be a mistake on our part that would be comparable to his mistake in losing his temper."" However, I disagree. This administrator is a hazard to the Wikipedia community and I request that you go ahead and request to have him de-adminned, according to the procedure. I will do my best to post this to your talk page and not your user page. " +I scanned these photos from the Elson book on a flatbed scanner. Unfortunately, that means the halftone pattern from the photo being printed onto paper. The other two photos I could use a blur effect and fiddle around with contrast to reduce that problem and get some progress out of, but doing the same thing to the top photo ended up making it look very out-of-focus. +" sknaht Sorry about being so backward in my thanks, but I only just discovered your get-well wishes, which made me laugh — or at least made me try to laugh. ;) I seem to have misplaced my lungs, although I'm sure they'll turn up somewhere; I've resorted to buccal breathing, in respectful and appreciative solidarity with our amphibian friends ;) One thing occurred to me in my languid repose: we should discuss the age dependence of the immune system. You know, how young toddlers seem to have super-charged immune systems (important for surviving day-care) whereas older people get sick more readily? One cute factoid I gleaned from a dentist was that older people get a lot more cavities because they have dry mouths; producing less saliva means fewer protective peptides and they suck on sweet lozenges to wet their whistles, providing a nice diet of pure sucrose for their unwelcome guests. Anyway, speaking more generally, I think that lay readers would be really interested in the whole age-dependence thing, as it touches all their lives. Maybe someone there can look into it? I'll try to tackle the hormonal thing. Slinking back to bed, P.S. For someone with ""very poor memory"", you're remarkably good at remembering our MCB votes. ;) (Note to self: recalibrate scale for Tim's self-assessments.) Thanks muchly for your own vote of confidence, and I'll be happy to relieve you of the more mundane tasks, once I get well again. Hopefully, will recover before I do!" +Evertime I think Im getting bored by all of this, GD keeps adding fuel to my fire. Perhaps if he didn't act like he was smarter than everyone else, especially ips. He has no idea who is on the other side of the computer. Hes not smarter than the rest of us. +Outcome of DRN The outcome the the DRN was: Closing as moot. All parties on one side of the dispute have been indefinitely blocked as sockpuppets. I believe we now have a consensus for a significant reduction in the coverage of recent issues. +Yes, of course, I would certainly like to avoid a repeat. +Welcome!Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia: Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites. Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on . By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! +Speedy deletion for untagged images Hello there. I notice that you have added I4 speedy deletion notices to some images that have been untagged for more than seven days. Note that this is not necessary as images which are marked as untagged for more than seven days are automatically eligible for speedy deletion via CSD I4. For example, all the items in Category:Images with no copyright tag as of 1 October 2006 (which includes some of the items you tagged) are eligible and will be deleted any time now. Hope this helps. +" Please mind your own business Hi there... Please do not accuse me of making ""unconstructive"" edits on my own user page again. Get your facts right next time. 118.92.22.70 " +" Clan lists and maps I noticed this title, and found it unfit (I didn't see anything relating to maps). I'm going to shorten it to Clan lists, or something of the like. If there's a set reason for the ""and maps"" part, then by all means, revert, and just leave a note here, explaining why. " +" I'm sorry, but that would be utterly retarded. Clannad (the band), the name clearly explained multiple times in their history as an amalgamation of the Gaelic Clann As Dobhar, has been active since 1972 and has spearheaded a specific style of music on their own and additionally as an influence to many other bands. ""Clannad"", the novel/game, was created in 2004 with NO explanation of why they chose that name for the Latin-alphabet spelling, other than a rumored summation that the creator may have liked Clannad (the band). ₪— (T·C) """ +Category:Place of birth missing (living people) Category:Date of birth missing (living people) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Asdadogs. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +July 2009 (UTC) Talk 01:08, 2 +If you don't like the specific objection, we can make it more general. +you may want to check out the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance article at some point. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chad Reed. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Celebs Hi Would you pls revert again there to last edit; wikipediatrix reverted me when I did not even remove the offending material, all I did was polish the other bit. I don't think she bothered to look. I would do it myself but I decided to seek some assistance rather than continue the war. Thanks +Chicago, Illinois has gone to your head. +Chutzpah describes nightscream's comments regarding attacking other users as nightscream seems only to engage in that, especially the call to assume good faith - as Nightscream's comments on this page suggest someone who does not understand the concept. As for the meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry, it might be better for Nightscream to abandon this issue as that editor is disruptive here. +Look - here's one I just merged: Template:ARIA Award for Best Female Artist. Not one of yours, but this had been made up of six component parts!!! +What a FASIST YOU are!!! = Who do you think you are??? What right do you have to browse through other peoples' talkspages??? Nobody gives you the right to be thought police! Did it hurt you my talk about agents??? I thought it would! Traitorous villain, I will search for you, and you will pay dearly! Θα φτύσεις τόσο αίμα όσα ευρώ σε πληρώνουν οι αμερικανοί, πουτάνας γιε! +Hello. Please do not replace others' posts on talk pages with your own. Please post your comment alongside the other, existing comment. Your comment was retained, however, the other post was restored. Thank you. 69.155.128.40 +warnings removed - personal attacks have continued - formal complaint to be lodged I note that despite the warnings to not remove the warnings the warnings have been removed. Not only that, but further comments have appeared on my talk page in which it is clearly suggested that I am being unfair and dishonest. The matter will now be taken further. +I find his motivations to be valid enough to warrant a discussion on the topic, at the very least. He thinks if you say he is wrong, that equals harassment. That does not fly at Wikipedia. If you want to publish here, prepare for your work to be scrutinized. +" cmt Brad with people who are block-evading with multiple accounts and trying to slip in guideline changes with those sockaccounts, I'm not sure it sends the right signal to revert back in those edits. " +" Sockpupet labelling Don't go around labelling user accounts as suspected sockpuppets. If you have evidence to present then present it in the correct place, but do not go around arbitarily labelling user accounts as sockpuppets. talk " +" No, I did mean to revert. Having additional arguments that flash up when you roll the cursor over the text does increase the weight given to the ""stop all acetominophen use in children"" POV, which was already too high. We're taking two papers and counterpoising them against the opinion of expert panels at the American Academy of Pediatrics and a review at the National Institute of Clinical Excellence. I don't think it makes sense. You joined this discussion at a point after which I had already spent many hours of work on it, and I've had to defend myself against an unwarranted COI investigation as well. Its fine to disagree that the 7408 words that have been spent on the topic here and the additional words over at COIN are not sufficient. But ""I'm not letting it slide just because you want to be done with it"" seems unnecessarily dismissive and disrespectful. I've put a lot of work into this, and while I do not expect others to always agree with me, it would be nice if they showed some respect for my efforts. " +Poor English and moreover poor ANY language: unclear This is so short and so full of mistakes that it is rather hard to follow. Does he have one thesis in law or two theses? Why would anyone have two theses in the same field? Why is there insistence on this (location of MA thesis in law, location of PhD thesis in law) when he is mostly known as a historian? Are there ISBN and links to those for his books? This article needs serious reworking. +" The Lonely Forest page Please put back the page I just wrote on Lonely Forest, I noted in their talk page why they are ""notable.""" +Thank you for the information . I will try to find more sources. +" All right, if it's false then at Bălţi is not the case for steppe because steppe is ""an arid land with xerophilous vegetation found usually in regions of extreme temperature range and loess soil"" (by Miriam-Webster definition). That's not the case of ""Bălţi area"" which may be moved to depression as Dc suggested. " +" RADIUS Question I'm taking a Security+ class right now and one of the questions in our book is this: Which of the following cannot be used as a RADIUS client? A) VPN server B) Wireless access point C) Network access server D) Windows workstation Now, the answer according to the book is D) Windows workstation, which we all agreed with. However, we don't know why. Any input would be nice. If your windows workstation had a GINA module that acted as a RADIUS client the answer could be all of the above. Things like this actually do exist and are used for some applications such as guest networks and cyber cafes. Wireless section? Is it just me, or does the following not make sense: Although RADIUS was not initially intended to be a wireless security authentication method, it improves the WEP encryption key standard, in conjunction with other security methods such as EAP-PEAP. RADIUS does not ""improve"" on WEP; although auth credentials can be transmitted from the NAS/AP to the auth server using RADIUS, the underlying WEP security is still as vulnerable as it otherwise would be. Can we delete? Question - why UDP? It's always baffled me why RADIUS uses UDP and not TCP. UDP seems much better suited for streaming applications where the loss of a few packets is tolerable. A perfect example is streaming live video. But as a developer I can't see how these principals apply to what we're trying to achieve with the RADIUS protocol. Surely the overhead of TCP wouldn't have any scalability or performance issues on fast networks and modern hardware? Someone please enlighten me why they chose UDP for RADIUS. Why UDP? Answer RADIUS is designed to scale to large-scale deployments with dozens, maybe hundreds of BASs all talking occasionally to a couple of central servers. Given the underlying reliability of modern networks, the overhead of maintaining hundreds of open TCP connections would have been overkill. The alternative (open a connection each time a packet needs to be sent) would also have been inefficient (no point in performing a 3-way handshake for the sake of a single accounting update). On balance, UDP is probably the best choice. Remember that RADIUS has built-in acknowledgement/retransmission mechanisms to cope with the occasional lost packet. For a more flexible and robust protocol, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIAMETER. Another reason is that when RADIUS was designed, it was possible to implement a UDP stack in a single embedded chip, but a TCP stack was more complicated (read: more expensive). This seems rather silly now, but it was a real problem designing cheap devices back then. You can still find the same reasoning in SIP-phones although SIP can be used both over UDP and TCP, a lot of vendors only implement the UDP part. Bulk Changes Commited some new text at the start to try and speak to what RADIUS is/does for those who don't have much knowledge of it and its associated soup of TLAs. Think it would be good to axe/move some of the existing text especially the paragraphs including and immediatly following 'Many networks services (' Some ideas for new sections: One focusing on each of the popular RADIUS auth protocols PAP,CHAP,MSCHAP,EAP..etc centralizing some scattered information. A second on popular backend databases SQL, password files, LDAP..etc...in the spirit of whatever common practices there are for managing accounts. Finally security focused protocol criticisms such as use of MD5/secret key lengths/""Just use IPSec"" a security/mitigation section might be helpful. Cleanup Over the next few days, I will spend some time to cleanup this article. I am planning on adding three figures. One showing a block diagram of RADIUS in an enterprise where dialup, VPN and Wi-Fi all use the same RADIUS server, a typical protocol stack and a block diagram of a roaming scenario where there is a proxy RADIUS server communicating with a remote RADIUS server connected by a PKI tunnel. I +Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ·:· ·:· +" John Peel Thanks Wikiklrsc, I had forgotten that he'd phoned in an article to the Liverpool Echo, though at the time he had pretended to be a reporter. On the 1st Marriage I don't know why you've modified my edit on that as it is accurate (source: Peel's autobiography & a few websites). You say the modification was ""due to being unclear on the motivation of prior edits by ""AllanHainey"""" - my motivation is to have a full & complete wikipedia entry. I will check Peels autobiography tonight for more details & re-add info on this, as a 1st marriage (especially to a 15 year old) is a significant part of his life & should be included. If you've got any objection or reason not to include this we can discuss it on the talk page. Thanks for confirming the computer programmer bit - I hadn't seen any reference to it on the web or autobiography so I assumed it was false. " +Links I notice that we are putting all sorts of links to actual terrorists incidents - at the moment all we have is a CLAIM of a incident. This could be just another forrest gate or ricin plot type case, however by putting in the links aren't we engaged in a form of crystal-balling ? +OK, did clarify what he meant, which is, judging from the he supplied as explanation is that I am impersonating the perfect whiny neurotic jew. So upon expiration of my block that came as a result of protesting anti-Semitic rants on Wikipedia, I will be filing a complaint against first thing for his nasty little anti-Semitic slur against me. I am really baffled as to what goes through the minds of some editors here. +" Time to reactivate the Well, it has been a while since I have last asked you, however, it is definately time to reactivate it. There are so many GIF images that need to be converted to PNG. " +Hello, I've reverted your latest edit of the ManU-Arsenal article because no consensus has been reached in the discussion at WP:FOOTY and I think you should wait until this has been achieved before trying to impose your view on the article. I note that you have performed what amount to four edit reverts yesterday and today. I think this is out of order given that the matter is subject to discussion. Please be patient. +Nothing here is ever really destroyed — just made inaccessible. Give it a couple days and then write to the deleting administrator asking nicely if you can somehow get access to your work. Your instinct not to vent on them is a good one — growl to yourself, screaming at them won't help. Another option (probably the one I'd advise) is just to pick yourself up and dust yourself off and start over on something else. best, —Tim +" Just like the hate-filled quote that was used ""the plethora of attempts to relate apiru (Habiru) to the gentilic (i.e. biblical word) ibri are all nothing but wishful thinking."" Talk about hate speech and a grand attempt to belittle anyone that believe the Bible. This is typical high-nose stuck up ""I'm a Atheist so I'm sooooooooo much better and smarter then you knuckle dragging believers"" load of BS. It needs to be removed at once. but I know it won't be removed. " +there is this racist troll called Kansas Bear.i call him Kansas the arm taker.this moron is supported by foreign government agencies . a person like this has no place in wikipedia. racist groups should not be in wikipedia at all. he is stupid troll . when you see him just report him right away +I support the arguments of Jadran91. All indications are, that this is the Silesia. Former this area is Lusatia, but former. From 1815 (two centuries) it is Silesia. +When are you going to learn that a definition should only be accurate and correct, and has nothing to do with narrow-minded? You should read your crap out loud and hear how bad it sounds. University libraries and journal search tools? Are you serious? Like I'm going to find plenty of people reviewing the latest LP that had a few hundred copies pressed (at best) when it came out. I don't have little distro order forms from the early 90's either. Those things usually contain little descriptions of bands/albums. Even if I did, you wouldn't take them as legit sources anyway as you would delete anything like that if I edited this topic. You don't let anyone skew from the word of Greenwald. What's Greenwald have on other people with websites? His crap has an ISBN number to it? Big deal. You already shot down fourfa.com. What makes Greenwald better than Andy Radin or Ben Gook's 2002 article (http://www.furious.com/perfect/emo.html)? Why mention Blush when he gets referenced 3 times and clearly is not someone that's written about emo other than filling out the 80's hardcore scene history by briefly mentioning the Revolution Summer. Maybe I'll write a book, self-publish 5 copies, make a website to promote it, then I can fix this garbage up. Of course after all that hard work you'd just delete it anyway because you love pushing the agenda of lies here. +What's Your Problem? What Did I Do? Huh? and here's your image shack: (http://img838.imageshack.us/content_round.php?page=done&l;=img838/8128/till.png&via;=mupload) BTW I PROVIDED A RELIABLE RESOURCE WHICH YOU IGNORED!!!!!!! I'm reverting your edit. eitehr Contribute/Improve or Leave as Is. +Commons licensing Thanks for letting me know, I think it was a bug. I'll keep a closer eye on things in future. +Well, I'll concede that it depicts the organ used in breastfeeding, as does every other picture in the article; in other words, it's redundant in that regard. ∇∆∇∆ +" Seriously- find the ""flattery"" in what I posted- I doubt you can. Oh but sorry if I offened you, but maybe you should keep your diaper out of other people's stuff. - and since you're so great why don't you run for president?" +Jewishness There is no information to proof he was Jewish (User talk:Ari777il) +know of one or two horse farms on OSR, I don't know of an xmas tree farm and I +Images posted by Thank you for calling attention to the lack of a tag on Image:Crpf.gif, and giving me a warning instead of just deleting the image outright. I've put a symbol tag on the image, stated a fair use clause, and purpose of the image in the article. You may go ahead (if you possess the administrative power) and delete the orphaned Image:CoolFox outside.jpg, as I have removed it from my userpage intentionaly and do not intend on posting it again. Good day to you, and thank you again. +" Yes, that does make it an inappropriate article when you have recreated it several time even though it keeps getting deleted due to lack of notability. Continually recreating the article can be considered vandalism which can get an editor blocked. ... talk " +, which is obviously my fault +" Hello, from Russia... That's VERY interesting, as You know, better than me, that the Yak-7 was extremely similar to the Yak-1M that Lidya Litvyak flew usualLY, even that day... So, it could be that Hartmann was the victor of Litvyak... but if I understood well, Hartmann was from II.JG 52, while, according to the ""table kills"" of our friend RusoArgentino, she encountered, that day, pilots from I.JG 52. 1.08.1943 73 GIAP Yak-1b ""White 23"" Bf.109G-6 W.Nr.15852 Unknown (50% dam) 2./JG 52[57][58] 1.08.1943 73 GIAP Yak-1b ""White 23"" Bf.109G-6 W.Nr.20423 Hans-Jörg Merkle - KIA (30-kills ace) 1./JG 52[59][60] You know if there is a biography, even in German, more specific than those of Toliver and Kurovsky? Cpaccibo! " +"==Blanking of Hovercraft== Hi. It may not have been your intention, bu tyou accidently blanked part of the above article. I have undone this edit. Thanks ! |  Chat  " +block what did i do then, i only added info not removed and disruptive edditing +I think its very unfair to compare my edits with those of Tbma/YMB29, first i have been the main contributor to this article, i have seeked the sources/ disscused in discusion all in line to improve this article, this is not the case with Tbma/YMB29 who just last week consider the whole article a hoax, also today i really displined myself not doing any of the previuslly acts of misconduct, so i think your crttisism of me is utterlly unfair. +" oo so u got angry for telling truth about u . ok i m sorry u r not Idiot . u r extreme Genius . Unique Prodigy who hav more brain than Mr. Einstein . Now r u happy )) )) D D D . i will try to follow WP:civil as i dont act like Pollitically Correct. but u also need to follow ( or use ur Brain if u really hav one which i think u hav ) whats write in article . u cant be whimsical about any article and with out any 2nd thought remove other peoples works. Understude Mr Dum... no no Mr. Prodigy Pebble Contact Blogsd ! " +Hi. I'm afraid that this isn't really the kind of help that Wikipedia or its editors are here to provide, but I wish you luck in getting to the bottom of things. (talk) +" In most cases the production_website parameter is unused, and the need for distributor website is limited to a single editor's opinion. The ""website"" parameter is easy to source, but there's no need to change the label. It's almost always just ""website"" or ""official website"". Next time I'm dragged into the silliness, I'll certainly take you up on your offer. Thanks. (✉) " +" ""Okey what? "": Don't upload any more photos, and especially don't add them to articles, until you thoroughly read and understand WP:NFC and WP:IMAGE. You have added images that are either copyrighted or have no copyright information on the image page. Either of those is a violation of Wikipedia policy. " +I believe the content of the sections Theoria, Hesychasm, and Noetics, could be restructured in a single section, but since LoveMonkey dealt with them, I'll leave this decisions mainly to him. +" Rokhsaneh Ghawam-Shahidi Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information.bons mots " +There is just one sourced statement from a single artist and the source link isn't even provided. +Wikipedia isn't a repository of pedophiles using NPOV stance to insert talking points into it's articles... oh wait, nevermind, it is. +sure why the Cain story doesn't belong in a biography article. If it's notable, then it belongs somewhere. Where else would you suggest? It's either got to go in (1) it's own article; (2) this article; or (3) the article about Cain and Abel. Of those three options, I think this one's clearly the most appropriate. There's nothing that says certain notable anecdotes can't be included in a biographical article. On the contrary, is that not where they belong? I'm not +I am Lucy Lennon 4me. I only made a comment here and I do not know this six person. I have not edited or touched any of these Lennon or May Pang pages. I added my opinion to the talk page. Judging from all the fights and time outs issued to this six person I can only conclude that they like to pick fights with people. +They really shouldn't let children on the internet unsupervised. - +Hey Cjchan2016, it looks like you got some good material and flow started in your sandbox, and simply require some touch-ups on Wikipedia algorithms to remove any excess notations. For example in your reference list, there’s an excess numerical links that don’t pertain to any relevant information but are connected to your sources. To eliminate that, remember to put the ending wiki-markup notations  If possible, perhaps include some simple explanations of certain mechanisms in how your fungi expresses its pathogenicity, prevent moldiness in harvests, or even examples of defensive properties. This would help provide a bit more depth in support of the facts, as you have good breadth on the topic of your fungi. Don’t forget to put subheadings when the time comes! Goodluck on writing! +Well I don't do complain IndianBio did.Also,he wants to be owner of In My City,bcoz nobody complain about me,only he do.He wants to be the owner of article.Ok I'm not gona say anything to anyone nor even I will again edit this article. So become happy Mr. IndianBio bcoz now it's completely your article. the user had added video counts as commercial performance and simple articles as reviews.gosh He was unhappy with my English so I wanna tell him that I did all my edit through my Windows phone.So I can't write like him bcoz typing with a cellphone is tiring.I write in parts on talk pages in short as its kills my fingers writing in details and formatting all links.If you think you are a good writer.....change the world Bio,write novels then....hehe....Indian ho Indian raho...( ) +Leave it alone as it is now (and it would really help if whoever it is proposed the merge made clear wtf actually is proposed i.e. merge what? where from? where to? ). I found the article useful and the list also useful highlighting individuals who yet lack a wiki some of which I propose, for example Katherine Chidley, to supply. +(while misrepresenting the situation) +Whoever took Central Asia out of the beginning, put it back In the beginning of the article, it said afghanistan was in south and central asia. Now it just says south. Please stop the vandalism and put central asia back, and possibly west asia as afghanstan can be either, but mostly it is considered central asian or middl eeastern. +" Your email First I should say it's best to communicate on-wiki for the sake of transparency. Secondly, you accused me of lying when I said that I was called various names. Because of that accusation I will quote the bit of the email I saw as calling me names: "" Deleting information according to your OWN opinion is the worst form of censorship. Despicable."" I interpreted that as calling me a censor and despicable. I've got a thick skin so I'm not really bothered. I'm not sure why you haven't commented at the talk page yourself as you are reading it. " +SBC-YBR is an idiot who reverts things without checking on them Hey idiot I know you have a hard-on for issuing corrections and warnings because you're a wikidick but check this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_in_Hell nothing I supplied in the Akbar the Great article was at all unpublished or made up or whatever. Groening regularly names characters after figures in Indian history (see Apu, named after a character in a famous film triology). So I'm gonna revert it and I don't want to see you making a fuss. +" Instead of wasting time on ad hominems, you might want to be searching for a source that says Canada sent ""troops"" (explicitly using the word ""troop"") to Vietnam. Just a thought. " +Haitham Al Haddad Sir I wish to report again that several users are attempting to block me from editing this page. I have done nothing wrong, all I am doing is reverting the article to how it was originally. They want to input negative assertions about this person, which amount to nothing other than personal attacks. Yet when I try to undo their changes it seems they are 'ganging up' on me by making threats against me. They want to ban me permanantely and prevent me from having my say. I feel victimised, harassed and bullied and am getting upset about it. I have never warred and I am not a vandal. Yet these are other users are trying to discredit me and it is not fair. In fact these users are warring and vandalising and they are allowed to get away with it. I do hope am not being discriminated against. I am doing this because Mr Haddad is someone I know as he is the Imam at my local mosque. He also has young children and if they see what has been written about him it would cause this a great deal of distress. I have tried to mediate with the user Blixx but he/she has ignored me and has continued regardless. Please assist me with this issue. Shafic Essop +I was staring to but shut down by a moderator who did not sign or explain the deletions as a modertor. The method of doing business seems to need changing. Had you said you were the moderator I would have entered into discussion before adding it back. There are many who apoose insurance patents. +You're not Hitler, just just another idiot! +Image source problem with Image:41 lucian bute-729557.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:41 lucian bute-729557.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. グレン +I didn't called them or tamils stupid. Asked from them not to make SL Tamils stupid. +Its a school and some of the d students got carried away, sorry +Thanks for your response, much better than this Jin Jinu fan whose English is just good enough to say useless, useless and nothing more. I still disagree with your position, but we can keep it out for the moment to avoid another edit war. +if you have any questions, just reach me here: User talk:Son. +Statement has been reinserted, but I shall find a better reference. +I put december 7 55 correct day for valdez fight, what did you do, october, shut up and you had more mistakes, too many to write them here! +But most of my edits were constructive, so i deserve to be unblocked. +Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Greg and glory m) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (T, C, ) +"}} {{Listen |filename=Skream-Rutten-sample.ogg |title=Skream - Rutten (2006) |description=Excerpt from ""Rutten"" by Skream, demonstrating a bassline driven track backed up by a sparse, half-time drum beat. |format=Ogg" +( wtf stop deleting my stuff! you have a first grade education!@$$hole +Your edit to everyman I'm sorry to have to revert your edit, but it has no citation and it seems to me, looking at the movie's article, to be a questionable analysis of the character. Fields's stock drunk character is its own type. But at any rate, this article has been plagued with people putting in uncited examples, so I've had to be very hard-nosed about removing them. If you can come up with a citations, you are obviously welcome to re-add this example. +Easily divergent Banias is about the spring and water and not a city. While Caesarea Philipi is a great city. Both articles are quite separate and independent..Therefore do not support... +" A barnstar for you! The Civility Barnstar Your recent edits on historical Jesus deserve this star, because you used a novel approach that didn't give civility for it's own sake, but where it was deserved. Many people have tried to edit pages on Jesus, Religion in Nazi Germany, Religious views of Adolf Hitler, etc. and run into the exact situation you described. When they approach it with too much civility they get run off and bullied by teams of Christian editors. It's about time someone approached the situation with the civility that is needed. Brother, I have run into so many dubious sources, and what's worse absolute abominations and interpolations on legit sources. They've been doing it for 2000 years, is it any surprise that Wikipedia wouldn't be a magnet for Christian interpolations? What's worse, if you remove it, it gets reverted by not one, but two or three others and they watch every page religiously. There's a group, I estimate of about 100 who have ruined Wikipedia, and some of them are admins. " +I'm in ur comment, fixin ur bold tags +" Re: St. Martin's Press (vis a vis its being falsely called a Source of a Chapter of Criticism about NCCC) In order to understand my comments above about St. Martin's Press, (for those, if any, unfamiliar with it): http://www.stmartins.com/Footers/aboutsmp.html ""Founded in 1952 by Macmillan Publishers Limited of England, St. Martin’s Press is now one of the largest publishers in America. Best known for the strength and breadth of our list, we publish 700 titles a year, and are equally committed to finding and nurturing the first-time author as we are to bestseller publishing. From our home in the Flatiron Building in New York, St. Martin’s operates eight separate imprints ..."" http://www.stmartins.com/Footers/aboutsmp.html ""St. Martin’s prides itself on having the largest and broadest list of any U.S. publisher, expressing the widest possible range of human experience."" " +Roz Turnbull Hello Cyberwitchy, This is just a courtesy visit to apprise you that I took the liberty to slightly expand your article, citing references and wikilinks to support it. Hope you'd appreciate my little effort. Best regards, ( ) +Everything is verified. Your attempting spin. And moderators like you have an agenda. I will report you. +May 2012 (UTC) Hello? Are you, by your silence, admitting that you are one or more of the heinous creatures that I've listed? Based on the actions of Bad Gopher Gear, I can only make the assumption that this user cannot answer my question as to whether or not he or she is descended from a branch of the Allison family because he or she is, and is attempting to stifle discussion. 02:09, 26 +I really shouldn't use my real name on here... P +" On Urartu, he hasn't reverted you since your last revert. As for Monte Melkonian, it's not a good idea to implement your version by edit warring. Try using the talk page and get a consensus first. That's what I would do. khoi " +" Earliest human fossils I am moving back the date on the earliest human fossils found. This was published in ""Nature"", one of the most highly respected scientific journals. If anyone wants to make changes, thats fine, just as long as this new date and a link to the new discoveries is mentioned in the article. Also - the fossil dates mesh with the biological data. " +That attitude won't get you laid +" Critical examination of conspiracy theories? ""The conspiracy theories, claims of aspartame dangers, and the source of those claims has been the subject of critical examination."" By whom? One article by Media-Awareness.ca? Industry websites such as Aspartame.org. The conspiracy 'facts' have not been ""critically"" debunked anywhere on or offline. " +Arabist pov-pushing You were absolutely right about the Arab Wikiproject being used to push the Arab nationalist pov. They deleted all the sources about Egyptians who don't accept the imposition of this ideology, can you believe it?? +Arg. THis shit is not CREDIBLE! +":Your change were made to Justify Hafe Baked Truth & Remove Nagetive Facts, however,You r welcome to discussion of specific edits & how they improve/ detract from the article ) ) Contact Blogsd ! " +" cougar? i must be out of it. since when does a 36 year old qualify as a cougar? milf, sure. but cougar? maybe in about 10 years. and hasn't the term ""milf"" been WAY overdone? if was funny in ""american pie"", but now people use ""milf"" to describe anyone over the age of 25. why can't lisa ann be just plain ole' HOT?" +Sango123 likes to suck cock. +" Esperanza Elections Kimchi.sg Thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Elections. Your support is much appreciated, and it means that I am now in the Council. I will continue to try my best, and if you have any questions or queries, please don't hesistate to leave me a message. Thanks again, — Fox 15:43, 10 July '06" +A quick point The thing is, what is a more sensible approach to take? Generalise about the negro and assume its common stereotyped ways and mannerisms Avoid being prejudiced but in doing so expose yourself to a greater risk of being a victim of violent crime? I'm genuinely curious to know your take on this. 94.4.3.210 +Dmacks consitatnly edits other peoples pages and is uttelry pathetic 89.240.186.147 +" ... Thanks for the quick response Khoikhoi. I was quite impressed with how level headed your second reply to me was (you didn't immediately go into a defensive ego trip like some others I've bumped into. Very much appreciated. A rare quality ). I will take your advice and will refrain from doing such edits temporarily. If possible though I still would like a little more clarification on the matter before I make any final decision on the matter. While there are occasional exceptions, a visit to virtually any article on any city in the world (new or old) doesn't show the pattern of a long list of multiple old not in use historically insignificant foreign names on the first line. For instance FYROM/Republic of Macedonia's title lists Macedonian: Скопје, pronounced [ˈskopje], Albanian: Shkup, or Shkupi)[1] (their two largest demographics). There is no mention of older Turkish and ancient Greek pronouncement for Skopje). So it seems very fishy to me that obscure Greek islands are seemingly being prioritized with old Turkish occupation names over major cities. Also I would like to note the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) specifically states ""The title can be followed in the first line by a list of alternative names"" (i.e. not ""must"" be) It further clarifies the point (with regards to use of older historical foreign names on the first line)... Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted and should be listed in alphabetic order of their respective languages, i.e., (Armenian name1, Belarusian name2, Czech name3). or (ar: name1, be: name2, cs: name3). Unless you can demonstrate that these obscure alternate foreign language name qualify as ""Relevant foreign language names used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or used by a group of people which used to inhabit the geographic place""... I don't believe an obscure set of Greek islands remotely qualifies for this rule of prominent display. And this point of sensitivity to names is further clarified at the head of the geographic naming convention article where it explicitly states... Historical names or names in other languages can be used in the lead if they are frequently used and important enough to be valuable to readers, and should be used in articles with caution. Notice the words ""and should be used in articles with caution"". I think it's pretty clear that the Balkans are an extremely sensitive area with regards to names. (it stirs the pot for old ethnic conflicts) I think perhaps you've misunderstood my motivations here a bit. The issue for me wasn't whether the names could be mentioned (they obviously always should be in there somewhere)... but exactly where in the article they are mentioned. Unless it is historically important (e.g. Constantinople) any mention of older historical Turkish or Greek occupation names should only be added later in the article in a historical or etymological context.... not be given equal airplay upfront with current names or historically unimportant names. Doing so is both bulky and highly provocative to sensitive political regions. (and incidentally the same rule should apply for inappropriately using historically insignificant Greek names for Turkish cities) I'm sticking to my guns that my edits were kosher according to existing Wikipedia geographic naming conventions and current widely observable conventions. I'd even go further and suggest leaving those old historically insignificant foreign names prominently displayed is far more disruptive than removing them (both in a Wikipedia sense and in a human toll sense) I therefore would like to once again remove those old names from the first paragraph but will delay pending your response to me (to confirm I have (or have not) convinced you of the accuracy of my assertions) Thanks in advance for all your help. " +Thanks. I'll read up on the requirements. Vince +" /*H-D-H songs list*/ H-D-H songs list Those two Michael Jackson songs from 1975 aren't really H-D-H songs, as Lamont Dozier had already split a year-and-a-half earler. If they're included, then the five 1970s ""New"" Supremes singles written by the Holland brothers should also be included. What do you say? Best, " +But I do have one point to make regarding assuming good faith on thisif the same IPs are related to seemingly credible entries in the past which have now been adulterated from the same source terminals and it now appears that a parent or someone in a similar position may be trying to rectify it, why haven't they themselves cleaned the entries up? If they were proficient in wikipedia editing before, why suddenly have they apparently lost their touch? Logic perhaps isn't my strong suit, but it seems to me to be quite inconsistent and highly suspicious. I hope to be proven wrong. +First, I have made the change of Namboodiri to Namboothiri. Second, I want to thank Mel for not reverting the current content. Since the subject of links has been broached, I wonder if it wouldn't be good to try to resolve that category next, rather than item by item. A cross-wiki link to Wiktionary may be better for some of the links, but for now, I'd like to focus on only the issue of whether the word should be linked or not. What should not be linked Plain English words: crocodile universe mortality theistic The time, space, causation, change and eternity articles do include sections on philosophy, but it is embarrassing that the only comment on Asian thought on these matters I found was one sentence in Causality. Consequently, a reader of this article would find little of help in those. Moreover, this article does not discuss the philosophy of time, space, causation, change or eternity in any significant detail. But, I would support linking to those articles once they include significant Asian philosophical content. But, even then, the link should be to the philosophy section, not to the top of the article. I didn't find anything on philosophy or religion in universe or mortality. time space causation change eternity What should be linked Major connections with the subject of another article that will help readers to understand the current article more fully: Vishwanath Kashi Shiva Ishwara Manisha Panchakam But only if the article is written promptly. Nrsimha Kali Laksmi Buddhism South India Kashmir is linked, so South India or India should be linked as well (but only the first occurrence). The second is a redlink. Technical terms should be linked unless they are fully defined in the article: shlokas atman But only the first occurrence and it should be spelled consistently. sacerdotalism Discussed earlier, see above. Hindu Thank you. (talk) +" (Added note) I appear to have been blocked by with the explanation of ""sustained campaign of personal attacks, clearly not here to write an encyclopedia in any way"". (a characterization I clearly object to, considering that I have personally written ). Since I am unable to participate in the discussion at the Noticeboard, if someone could please post my above comments there (the top two paragraphs to Bishonen), I would be appreciative, thank you. " +WP:NPA Hello, . This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. talk +checked the article source its clearly misleading information cited from a reference riddled with contradictions and flaws. +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Hello, Asherro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (talk to me!) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles |- ! How you can help |- |style=""color:#0 +" Ched Davis said to use ""Did you know that when some Bishops are ready to mate, that their heads and backs turn a distinctive yellow in color."" so I'll put that in as an alt. I think I will do some more bird articles. " +Ahm, type in 'Indigenous' then AC. The Roth stuff should be available via MU for starters but its an anth paper so if not there, it may be at a uni that has an anth/arch Faculty. There is a recent study of Roth stuff too by Iain Davidson. My papers etc come from Indigneous studies units from several different unis so not sure they would be in published journals as such though some would be though I have numerous (maybe 300 arch papers on Indigenosu Oz). Approach the Humanities faculty at MU maybe or the head Prof at any uni that offers Indigneous Studies quals and ask can wik have some content so that what goes up isnt total nonsense. Not all goes on the databases but gets included in different 'Indigenous Studies readings' that are course materials. You could try 'Archaeology in Oceania' via JSTOR I think, or delve through Cambridge Uni journals available via Oz databases, etc or if you have access to MU, u then have acess to their library so they should maybe have some decent texts. Try using them. On the MU catalogue, try using the archaeology/anthropology database search. Does MU do arch/anth? try Oz history too and you may find a journal saying Indigneous people are an urban myth. +Yes, you have recommended the article to be nominated for good article criteria +Page locked by tool of Itaqallah The page is now locked in bad faith by a tool at the behest of POV-pusher Itaqallah following my complaint to WP:ANI about Itaqallah's blatant lying in his revert edit summaries. +"::::Agree. The wording is biased and should be left out. There are other ways to present this material. As the wording stands now, it seems like it is POV pushing and making him look as bad as possible. The whole impact leaves one with the impression that this guy has no credibility because he's always been bad. Not true at all. He was a kid nobody wanted and he ended up trying to survive. He wasn't out to hurt anybody. Notice he broke into offices during the night. Not during the day to harm people, etc.Malke2010 " +Kiss my tookhes, stupid. +You have exceeded the three revert rule. +" September 2012 (UTC) You are presupposing that Asparagaceae (or perhaps ""Asparagaceae"") is defined under the ICN. The code, however, claims merely to regulate nomenclature, providing definitions only of words like ""cultivar"" (in Appendix VII), words that do not name taxa. Even if you can produce a reliable source for your claim that names are defined in terms of a type and a rank (a claim that is also made in the lead), you have a problem with neutrality; Monsch (2003), for example, argues that names do not have definitions. The ICN entries, on this view, only fix the reference of names, while a definition—if one were possible—would provide the meaning. The meaning/reference distinction is much discussed in recent philosophy. 16:23, 24" +many more Gay Types there are many more types of Gay as Gay bear,chubby bear,stocky bear,chubby gays. more c www.bearwww.com www.bear411.com www.biggggercity.com\chat +Welcome to Wikipedia. This is the English-language Wikipedia, and contributions should be in English. You can find the Danish Wikipedia here. +" Thank you. I know some ""plat duuts"" (Frisian for PlattDeutsch) myself so maybe I'll go to that wikipedia. " +" Only if you can find citation that says so. Otherwise it's unverifiable speculation. After all, just because everyone in the country whose surname isn't ""Beckham"" (rightly) thinks Stevie G should be captain, it doesn't mean he's necessarily in with a shout ;-) " +" I believe he archived the discussion because the article no longer have the list. I would be ok with that. But we should go on with the infobox pictures issue. " +Once again, a new user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Truth360 has deleted the same sourced NPOV info, in an attempt to hide information from two Oakland/San Francisco Newspapers that is highly unfavorable to the subject of this article. Request third party assistance +" Jeppiz, you and I may have got off to a bad start, but I am more than willing to discuss things with you. This is, however, provided that you refrain from comments and snide criticism such as the one above where you say ""Alasdair's argument about Rummel is not particularly strong. He accuses Rummel of being a bad researcher, but I tend to place more trust in a distinguished professor in history than an anonymous Wikipedia user"". I suggest you strike that, as I nowhere do I accuse Rummel of being a bad researcher. What I did was to quote Tomislav Dulić from the Uppsala Programme for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Uppsala University, who wrote that ""the estimates used by Rummel for Tito’s Yugoslavia cannot be relied upon, since they are largely based on hearsay and unscholarly claims frequently made by highly biased authors"". Please strike your remarks and be more careful in future. " +lol kidding no offense my dick, my dick +Watch out for user Slo-mo, he's been vandalizing high school pages and then reports others to admins as vandals. So wrong. +May 2014 One more foolish attack like this and/or vandalism like this, or one more edit summary like this, and you'll find yourself blocked from editing. | talk . +in its current status (last edit by quadepus) +Yeah, yeah you are definately narrow minded. Read what I posted in the discussion thread. +CN tower fans are bitter +Thank you! I thought nobody would notice the article, it doesn't seem to show up on Google for some reason. I'll put that second link in my links section. +" (I think). (Talk) " +"== Discrepancy between two articles == There is contradictory information in the article on Christina, Queen of Sweden, where it is stated that ""Christina lost much of her popularity after the hanging of Arnold Johan Messenius who had accused her of serious misbehavior and of being a ""Jezebel"". Whereas in the article on Messenius it states he ""accused Christina of serious misbehavior and being a Jezebel for which he was beheaded together with his 17 year old son."" Not being a historian myself, I would offer that the more reliable statement is the latter, as it has some references associated with it, whereas the first does not. " +Funky monkey http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0331509/ This movie isnt on his list nor is it on wikipedia. +Third warning. STOP ADDING PIRATE WAREZ SITES TO WIKIPEDIA. +" As Father C, my former parish priest would delightfully crow: ""Nobody is beyond redemption"" " +What I've seen happen before is that anonymous edits are treated like shit, regardless of what they are actually doing, and that anyone with a username is automatically assumed to be OK. You saw that I made edits that were reverted by someone with a username. Presumably you didn't bother to look into the merits of the edits, you just assumed that the username was right to revert them. And so you attacked me for being angry, not the username for reverting sensible edits. I think you should be able to see that it's unreasonable to expect good faith from me in return for that. +" OK let's agree on one thing first: Including a link, not matter what the article is, requires substantial evidence in order to reason doing so. Having that in mind Planet Spore qualifies. BUT as we all agree (hopefully), WP is not a place to include every single website that may have info on a subject. (*)So we have to choose which are clearly ahead, in matter of info size, directory structure, further linking yada yada yada yada. For that matter WikiStylee you tried to justify the inclusion of gamingsteve.com and I agree, xspore.com where I also agree and sporewiki.com where I don't agree - not the inclusion but your justification. You asked for a logical fallacy and there you have it. You justify the inclusion of sporewiki.com in the Ext.Links because... it is already linked by WP. You have fallen into a logical loop there I'm afraid. To correct you to go * and see why sporewiki.com deserves an inclusion. I have 0 problems with Planet Spore being excluded but I have tons of problems with anyone who naively tries to belittle one's efforts as clutter and WP-relatedly with anyone who (unjustifiably then, hopefully not now) tried to scare away others who wished for the inclusion with the method of ""WHATEVER YOU DO IT WILL BE REVERTED"". I find THAT hideous and ugly because for the moment I care mostly for what WP provides, not GamingSteve.com or Planet Spore.com or whatever. So, that's all folks. Make up your mind and I will follow your lead in the greek equivalent in el:Spore (παιχνίδι). γράψε μου κάτι " +I am annoyed that you reverted my tiffin school edit and by the way I hate you! A conversation leads to some political warning, you make me sick! ==================================NOTICE!================================== | NO RUDE COMMENTS | | NO IMAGE DELETION NOTICES | | NO UNSIGNED COMMENTS | | ~ | | THANKS! | =========================================================================== +" That makes sense to me. As I reflect on this, I think that part of the potential for confusion is that the point, as I understand it, is that UVA's E-School was the first one that was associated with a university AT THE TIME OF ITS FOUNDING, as opposed to one that became associated later (or one that was part of a school that expanded its mission). Perhaps another idea would be to say ""... the first to be founded as part of a university"" or something similar to that? (I like the idea of the footnote with the stronger source either way, though. I recall there was a to-do about the Jefferson Society a while back and there was a question about whether their site was a sufficient source due to the notion that they have a conflict of interest in that they consider it prestigious to be the oldest debating society. The same argument might apply to the E-School's site insofar as they claim to be the oldest for prestige reasons.) " +" You're welcome and good luck with the Cup! " +Also, could you recolour ? +" Well, , a) my RfA was divisive and I barely passed, b) I've only been a practicing admin for about 3 months and, most importantly, c) as a clerk, I can see how hard the arbitrators work and how challenging it is to come to agreement with such a large group (over a dozen) members spread out over many time zones. It's a time-consuming, rather thankless responsibility and just becoming an arbitrator makes one a target for types who are anti-authority. So, if I ever ran, it would have to be at a time when I could devote time to it. I was looking at the history of the committee and I don't think there has been a term without one or more retiring early. People get elected and find out that it might not be the most rewarding experience. That's been my impression. Read! Talk! " +and Talk:Ali Khamenei +Oppose. It's only confusing if you let yourself be confused. Stick to fixing AFL pages and leave football articles alone. +It's OR. I've never heard that Quack Pack is a spin-off of DuckTales. You will need a reliable source if you want this sort of information to stick. +Women's Hockey task force Bonjour à tous, Hello Everybody, that think you of the eventuality of future a ''womn's hockey task force ? Your ideas, opinions, criticisms and advices are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey. Thanks, merci, תודה +Tommy OK, but all the other songs (bar the singles) are non-notable. See also this AfD. +You are an utter fucking faggot...u need a life outside of wikipedia...maybe a didlo fuk by ur mom? +Also, please not that you are an idiot. Thank you -DreamGuy +That was in the treaty Burra. +Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem Hi, Is there a proof of the above using the hyperreals? +LOL what the hell is up with you? You want to remove my link but you let that crap stay in? Jesus how pathetic! Oh you don't think its true? UMM NO SH*T MATE!!! +Thanks! Thanks for the unblock. +" This is what silly people get For not-so-subtle adjustments, . TTFN " +at the time, including +I like the article in many respects, considering it's just begun. However, adopting my persona as an Average Reader, I have some questions. Just how does the moving iron get forced to move? Isn't it just a variation on the magnetic force causing a coil attached to a cone of some sort to move? Why are they confined to cheaper usaes today? Is it only the low quality? And it seems that whatever the motive technique, cannot the various ways of loading it acoustically be equally applied, lower quality higher distortion aside? If the article addressed these issues, I would have a clearer idea in mind of where this design approach fits in the range from piezo through voice coil to Heil to electrostatic. +How.. How do I create new templates (such as infoboxes) +" Developer access I actually agree that it makes sense to limit ""developer"" access to a fairly small group of people. I nominated the number of individuals I did chiefly because I felt that Angela and Mav, despite the value and extent of their contributions, represent the same ideological wing of the Wikipedian spectrum. I thought it wise to diversity the group by including some Wikipedians who have different perspectives, like Fred and Martin, and some who are longtime contributors but tend to stay out of Wikipolitics altogether, like JohnOwens and the Anome. By the way, if you're serious about limiting the number of developers, you may wish to prune the list to exclude people who were once very active but are no longer involved. It isn't healthy (or secure) to include a bunch of emeriti on such lists. 20:27, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)" +Need a small section discussing history, as with other passports +" This user account is going nowhere. Time for this tree to be cut down, I think. (talk to me) " +" You didn't respond to this or act upon it, so I have taken to removing the link myself (again). I can assure you that this will be the eventual outcome of the issue if we get other users involved, so there is no point in you continuing to add it. Leave it now. (talk) " +" And on a general note, if you aren't sure what to do, just ask someone else that would know what to do. Thanks.talk " +" In case it is not clear, he is asking for a reconsideration of the deletion, which he believes was improperly done. Ruindofman and I have been in ofShalott " +Re: taxobox image widths Hi. Thanks for pointing out my error. I think I copied that from Tawny Owl (and I haven't changed my preferences from the default), but I'll know for the future now. Katie. +The club have traditionally been identified with and favoured by the Catholic and Republican community of Scotland, as well as the Republican community in Northern Ireland. For most of their history, Celtic have enjoyed a fierce rivalry with their cross-city opponents Rangers and the two are collectively known as the Old Firm. +Stop acting like a little dictator Stop acting like a bloody little dictator, OK? You seem to think you are Caesar of NCAA BB topics, and that that gives you the right to ignore fact and logic when taking a position on anything that concerns your little bailiwick. I asked for an editors' vote and you ignored my request. How about doing what you are supposed to do, which is helping determine consensus, and stop being a jerkweasel in reply to my reasonable suggestions? +Most orthodox Jews do not want to be associated with conservative and reformed Jews with regards to theology. Shouldn't there be a link going to the Orthodox Judaism page in the very beginning that people can easily identify without going to the bottom of the page? +I edited your material on GPT I edited something you added to the article on GUID Partition Tables. I'm pretty sure it is just a typo that I corrected, but I am not terribly familiar with the subject, so could you take a look at this? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GUID_Partition_Table&action;=historysubmit&diff;=397786496&oldid;=397444859 173.26.162.40 +. We fully agree that Ziua published calumnies, but that don't mean we can erase them to clean up Ziua's record - because, as can be seen there, the Ziua articles themselves formed the subject of controversy +" lord Shiva for Featured article lord Shiva for Featured article I just see many important features relating to the topic was missing, including a small description and link to Maha Shivaratri . I would like to give my points here.Undoubtedly lord Shiva is linked to all sections and regions of the Indian society.There are great works relating to lord Shiva in many languages. Remember he is pre vedic god, immensely popular among tribes later on included in the Vedas. If the page depicts what is in popular culture it will be a great source and the page should become ""Featured Article"". I feel there is discrimination of users writing from Tamil / Malayalam / Kannada even Hindi perspective. Sanskrit has its own credits, it is unique and as the name suggests it is ""well written"". I have written 4 articles on them. But it gets defamed by wrong promoters who make it mess up with other languages / claiming other linguistic works. My article was edited because i mentioned the name of the god in ""Tamil""?. Those who deleted them know whether Sanskrit and Tamil both used same script once before Sanskrit stuck to Devanagari script )? [User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] Talk TalkInclude Malayalam scripture works on ""Ayyappa"" please don't completely ignore them. I will give more details for my writings with explanations on sources later for your views. Shiva is linked deeply in Kannada, Maratha and Telugu traditions too, but very less representations in the page. And when it comes to lord shiva and muruga, you just cannot ignore Tamil if you have developed hat redness for the language. Include details what is popular among different peoples rather than quoting just Vedas. can you please give your views?" +Same business continuing. Your help would be appreciated. Cheers, +and respect that people from different places have a different manner of speech +Need your help Dear Sikh Historian, I would request all you all to please help me in exposing Sikh Scholar, who actually is an RSS sponsered person pretending to be Sikh, please see below the kind of statements he makes to me Wow wow so the truth is finaly out....you have spoken like a true Hindu RSS wala......is that the way a scholar speaks...wow...(my answere to him) (Sikh Scholars comments to me)....... stupid dumb FU*K MY great great great great grandfather was Mani Singh the greatest of Sikh matrys. Its scum like you that needs to be executed. You deserve execution - you stupid dumb fu*k everyone in my family over 500 members are Baptized Khalsa SIKHS. We have been Khalsa Sikhs for over 300 years you dumb fu*ker. Because you have insulted me and broken the teachings of the Guru Granth Sahib you deserve death -you dumb fu*ker.Sikh scholar (talk) (my answere to him)...Now I will be after you to expose all your RSS gang pretending to be Sikhs and being some kind of expert in Sikh religion...it my promise to you Fake scholar... He is being supported by few other RSS sponsered members (Gurkhaboy is one of them) in Wikipedia with regards to SINGH article here. what i have mentioned is the truth and the ground realities and they are getting me blocked... i would request you to please check on all history on Singh article and our talks..... +" New Pro-cannabis userbox {| cellspacing=""0"" style=""width: 238px; background: lightgreen;"" | style=""width: 45px; height: 45px; background: lightgreen; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; color: black;"" | '''| style=""font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: black;"" | This user is pro-cannabis, and opposes bigotry and oppression suffered by cannabis users. |} Just add {{Template:Pro-cannabis user}}''' to your userpage, and the box at right will appear on it. Also, your user page will be listed on Category:Pro-cannabis Wikipedians. Also, consider weighing in on the Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll. Stand up and be counted while you still can, " +":::I count ( at most) four actual opposes here but they account for 80% of the verbiage . And which policy based argument do you have against including an opinion from a notable person? Policies count for more than ""IDONTLIKEIT/HIM"" last I checked in closing any RfC. As opposed to six short supports. " +PS,Come to think of it, some Irish lessons would do nicely. +" College Students The article mentions ""The ATF began surveillance from a house across the road from the compound, but their cover was noticeably poor (the ""college students"" were in their 30s, not registered at the local schools, and they did not keep a schedule which would have fit any legitimate employment or classes)"", however, there is no mention of the college students in question before this section, and there is no indication as to which ""college students"" it is referring to. Perhaps the people who were filming? " +Wojtyla was a liberal of partial Jewish ancestry and most likely an anti-Pope, the Second Vatican Council was a robber council. +I am glad you finally ´start trying to interpret´ my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally ´try to´ (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! You did some personality progress since that times. There is no need for condescension. My approach has not changed. I realise you are not a native speaker of English, but your disregard for various Wikipedia guidelines was not dependent on your knowledge of English. I am not an Englishman. +" you know it bud...done! " +BLP concern Would someone please immediately delete the following from this article: Links to Health fraud and Quackery, and the category Deception. These imply that (1) Anderson's claims are false, and (2) that Anderson is deliberately deceiving people about them. We don't have any clear evidence of (2). We can quote people making colourful comments, but we cannot, based only on the evidence we have, have the article assert that Anderson is lying. These links and category in my opinion violate WP:V and WP:BLP. +" That edit? Fair play to whoever reverted that, that's unsourced POV commentary. 303 " +I'm sure there are many but they have already been driven off in frustration +This is unbelievable. Why you and administrators continue to insist on thinking that I'm Fragments of Jade or whatever name that woman uses is still a mystery to me. You want to believe I'm female? Be my guest. You want to have me range blocked? Be my guest. You want to continue to believe that I'm Fragments of Jade/Yomiel or whatever username that woman uses? Be my guest. It won't change the fact that you got the wrong person. You, Hula Hup and Fragments of JadeYomiel have made my life a living hell. Now I know how innocent people feel when they go to prison. Go ahead. Have me range blocked. Block an innocent person if it makes you sleep at night. You want to watch me 24 hours a day, seven days a week? Go ahead. I honestly don't care. 68.45.60.20 +Ok. I removed the adultery claims. +Erm What the hell is wrong with this *disambiguated* page? Why is there red links? The whole point of a page of this nature is to find something quickly which can be defined in many ways obviously you cannot go to a page which has a red link! +". You are more likely to find ""Space Capitol of the World"" around town" +ml I have the interface of wikien-l open, but can't find under which email address you are. Can you tell me your user name on the mailing list ? +Danny Danger My mistake I removed the speedy tag because he was mentioned on the Teen Idols page. Didn't realized that the same person had vandalized Teen Idols to add him. Mr. Danger has now been terminated. +Metric warrior Michael, could you see [here, and on his talk page. This user is ignoring the US-reelated aspect ot WP:UNIT to enforce his pro-metric POV on US-related articles. I've left a note on his talk page, both last Msay and today, short but polite, but he is accusing me of not being civil! I'm really not in the mood for dealing with this sort of user today, so please help! Thanks. - +Yes indeed. I have had a fair few run ins with the carphone dynamic IP. We don't seem to have a way to stop such accounts from as you say troll talk pages and being unable to edit but such accounts are disruptive, I should have ignored him. Personally I support only accounts and no IP edits, that would go a long way to stop many of the vamdalism and socking issues but it might make it a tad quiet. Best regards TFOW, nice to see you again. +As of April (see their Blog entry), the statistical stuff is online as a Beta version. Language pairs labeled 'beta' appear to be the new stuff. Side-by-side comparison shows it is definitely not Systran. Language Weaver doesn't have an online free tool like Systran, so I couldn't do a side-by-side comparison. I've been scouring the literature to see if they've published anything on what changes they've made to their system since the NIST eval, but I haven't found any info yet. +" Double cause for celebration, Diwali and your successful earning of adminship. Congratulations. Bakatalk " +You have been told the incident had NOTHING to do with the club. The social club has NOTHING to do with PFC. At least get you facts right before posting them up on a public domain. +Is there any chance that someone could add a mass transfer (general transport processes ) to the discussion. Just because the object to be dated is buried or not transport processes continue around the object. Is carbon-14 being leached out of the object at a faster rate or slower raten than the same process for nitrogen? Doesn't this have an effect on the ration of carbon-14 to nitrogen? +"NA}} }} Article needs rewriting There are a lot of grammatical errors in this article. It reads as if the person who wrote it is not fluent in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.115.152 " +MY PAGE 3234434a My User Page is totally about me, its about me and my team...SO WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? +" The article says she won the ""primary portion of the Texas primary and caucuses, [293]"", which she did. " +Get the fucking arse off this website. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Seahorse. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +" I added the template to the page for you. Regards, (Talk) " +" Typoes in VoABot II message In the message that VoABot II gives when it warns users about vandalism, ""sumamry"" should be ""summary"" and there should be an ""an"" between the words ""by"" and ""automated"". ''''''87 " +I've tried my best to prevent vandalism but all you've done is protect it along with the bold-faced liars who spread it. Your actions are irrelevant. 99.158.249.195 +" United Online You are gonna' have to stop adding unsourced and extremely POV content into the United Online article as you did in this edit. One simply may not make such claims w/o a source to back them up. More specifically, any assertions about Lobo also falls under WP:BLP with even higher standards for inclusion. Namaste.   [talk] " +" ZOG Mediation (By the way, you seem to have two talk pages; one at Humus Sapiens and one here, at Humus sapiens.) (TalkEmail) " +"Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. " +User:DCB4W/sandbox Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —84.52.101.196 +" Ya know, you keep coming up with this 'making statements without backing them up, but it is right there in black and white. Is that the best you've got?? My position on the Kidman pic is quite explicit and if you view my contribs you would see this. I figure you either have a hard time reading, or you just don't get it. I did like your contribution on the term ""pussy"" though. It seems you know your field and your concept of editing with content in the proper context does have its uses. Why don't you come up with something other than its 'informative' because I like to look at nude photos. " +Actually guys, nevermind. I am a homophobe! I HATE GAYS! P CALL ME EVERYONE I GIVE BJ's!!! LANCE BOYLE 1-617-669-2468 +Barek My post on Barek's talk page wasn't an attack, it was a virtual slap upside the head. Don't threaten me with your empty promises! I'm not afraid of you! I am a bagel baker! +I wrote a letter complaining about you Acroterion to Wikipedia corporate. You will be held accountable for your behavior. +I know what the HECK you are doing you damn User:CharlieEchoTango from sh*ting hell!! +This is not an attack, I'm just stating the facts. To keep a long story short, do you know any member to appoint to high level'd mods and admins who I/we can request a consenses be don'd on the lion vs tiger...if you'd be so kind and ask any you might know...it would be of much help and no more warring, and bias propaganda will then be emited by a sole individual. +JEREMIA USER TALK I HAVE A NEW SITE FOR 3 YEARS STANDREWS.TV BUT YOUR CROWD WONT LIST IT , WHY BECAUSE IT IS NEW , OR ALL YOUR REMITS STANDREWS.COM IS A F..ING BUSINESS,STANDREWS.CO.UK ,IS A CO OP OF BUSINESS.My site www.standews.tv is for the people I do it for free .But YOUR WIKI WONT EVEN LIST ME SO ...Oi I am BANNED WELL I DONT CARE......AND FOR THE RECORD JEREMY WHO HE IS WON!!! +To 'Stevie is the man!' - I am the person adding this particular cheeseburger link. The site I am trying to link to is fully dedicated to the topic in question. The site contains unique content that appears to be of better quality than the two links already in place. The site I am trying to link to will be updated regularly with general cheeseburger related stories. I hope this has convinced you? Thanks. 22:39, 6 August 2006 (GMT) +" East Jerusalem isn't in Israel either but it appears to be covered by this article. If the inclusion criteria for articles about the State of Israel are based on the notion of Israel as defined by the green line then fine but it would be good to be consistent across Wikipedia. Other articles such as Geography of Israel and Tourism in Israel don't use that approach. Perhaps these mismatches between article titles and content should be addressed and resolved centrally at WP:IPCOLL. ''' - talk''' " +When did Wikipedia allow its ADMIN to hold intolerant biased, one sided, select views that could undermine the integrity of Wikipedia and the as a tool for information. Question the ADMIN on sikhhistory as to why the ADMIN holds view contrary to the view of wikipedia. Thanks. +Your behavier is a disgrace to wikipedia. +Bad references, roots References to Steve Gurley, El-B as early promoters of DS are not working. Further searching The Wire site results no el-b and a link to burial's interview in case of gurley. Discogs search on those four (el-b, bias, gurley, jay) results only el-b and jay having original dubstep production, but all those four have a massive of remixes in dark garage era (1999-2002?). Some of them should be moved to dark garage 82.209.225.33 +go vandercken!! go!! wikipedia needs you besides why are you waisting your time talking in here instead of writing an article? +This message is regarding the page Playboy Enterprises. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. |talk|popups +" References! The material in the first chapter is directly copied from ""The Complete Mafia Encyclopedia"". Is there a place where this can be reported?" +" Sorry. I didn't now what to do, because he would get mad if I removed his angry remarks from my userpage, which I naturally don't want there. '''''''''' Ø " +In other words, I see no valid reason to continually delete valid information from the article. +you should be an admin +Neither are those. All way too modern to take without an explicit free license. — +Mimi Gardner Gates On the AfD you voted Merge into William H. Gates, Sr. I've added some notes to the article, namely the books she co-authored and a reference to her influence in the Association of Art Museum Director's guideline against selling art collection pieces. I think those items help establish her individual notability in the art world (and apart from her husband and step-son). I would appreciate any time you may give in reviewing the additions to see if they merit a keep. Thanks. +":""Straighten up"" is an uncivil comment made by Wikipedia administrator pschemp. " +God no. There are hundreds of jaggeds. There are dozens of enabling senior editors (administrators). The structure of Wikipedia is such that it tends to drive off Buckners (and people like me, though I'm not in his class) and retain people like Jagged 85. Until this gaping structural flaw is addressed, using my ten fingers to briefly plug one of thousands of holes does not appeal. +" You could try reading WP:SOURCES (which will explain why someone's Twitter page is not considered a ""reliable source""), WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:COI. All these will help you understand better what is wrong with your article. There is nothing to stop you creating the article again, but you will have to follow the guidelines on notability to prevent it being deleted again. In particular, you need to find that substantial coverage in third-party sources to justify the inclusion of this person. I couldn't find anything much through Google, just a lot of promotional material and a few mentions in non-notable blogs. Also, if you decide to start again, make sure to avoid phrases such as ""Her style carries an endearing child-like quality"" unless it is a direct quotation from a third-party source. That kind of wording is considered non-neutral. " +Actually the original definition was there long ago, and was not my invention. As for the ongoing observation that Christians do wrong every time they breath, let me note that Samuel Sandmel was Jewish and the concept has also been used by Jewish scholars. But I am not really sure how to continue the discussion given that it seems to be as much about the inherent faults of the Christian mindset (which I think has no relevance here) vs the topic at hand. Regarding the Osiris myth I think you have also been unhappy about that page, although it is FA. I have now explained the Jung issues, and the scholarly consensus about the category is clear. I think what can be done is to follow the middle ground between what the encyclopedia of psychology and religion and the handbook of Archetypes and motifs do, because they are overviews. That may be the best way to get the scholarly issues there. +REDIRECT Talk:S.L. Benfica (rugby union) +Your opinion/input sought Hi, Flyer22. Thanks for your commendable work on Avatar. I wonder if you would consider spending some time on Themes in Avatar too, to help bring it up to the mark with the main article. Regards, Hey, Cinosaur. I appreciate your work on the Avatar (2009 film) article as well. I'll think about helping out with the Themes in Avatar article, but it will not be soon and I cannot promise anything on that. +please , fuck jobas with me +the bestest ever thing is that you are not an administrator - +The vast majority of biologists do not agree that biblically literal creation is supported by the evidence. Most usages of uniformitarianism can be seen as usages of ockham's razor. To reject ockham's razor is to reject modern day science. I disagree with Batholith below as I think it is very important to have this page in order that people can make their own minds up with the necessary facts and figures at their fingertips. Btw could you refrain from capatilising key words in your text as it is rather off putting. 23:38, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC) +Possibly a change will be motivated by advances in measurement techniques, but of course, metrology has to weigh a variety of practical considerations, so experimental advances are not the only thing entering a decision to change. +Well then, the only thing left me to do is wait for you to get bored with Wikipedia. I'll be around for a while; you, I'm not so sure. I am a force for good, you, less so. And so I reckon it is only a matter of time before you get bored with your own... highly questionable conduct and find something else to occupy your time. God willing, anyway. I've already seen countless people like you come and go. Primary example, Essjay. You're not as bad as him mind you. +Williams and Paisner books 2009 Can someone check the differences between On The Line and My LIfe: Queen of the Court? They were both released in 2009 as her autobiography but under different publishers? I'm assuming On The Line is the final version she had published. - +REDIRECT Talk:Beyond Belief: Candles in the Dark +thank you deville, i was trying to make adisambig page for the two dan meyers, but i kept running into problems, hanks for sorting it out, as u can tell im not that advanced at this. thanks - widereceiver19 +Detailed explanation of the theory +Hello? Has there been any more news since whenever? +Needs more secondary sources A biography by the leader's brother and materials from the center are not sufficient to tell this account. Given the state and national attention the events commanded, and their relation to other major actions by Indians, there must be many articles by mainstream press of the time, and academic studies later. Other sources and points of view should be cited. History This section should provide more context - e.g., number of Indians in Seattle compared to general population, nature of urbanized Indians (what brought them to Seattle? and when?), issues that they faced in employment, discrimination, etc. What else were their groups doing? It mentions the Alcatraz occupation but not much context for that, either. How many people were in the local activist group when they started? How many were arrested? Center operations It would be useful if more information were provided about the operations and their effects: important art shows, # of visitors annually, outreach to Indian and other children, etc. +Unbalanced (pasting a reply which I wrote anyway ) .. on mine too. Something changed in the TFA or ITN recently - their relative length was very different. Anyway, less than an hour for the next DYK update. Unexpected changes in various sections + strong screen resolution dependence make it a nightmare. +but he thinks he is above this rule and has reverted this page 4 times within an hour +Categories Rather than acting capriciously and on your own regard in your deletion of categories, please remember that Wikipedia works through consensus. There is on-going discussion regarding this here, but do not make further categorical changes until consensus has been reached, or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. +P.S. Please also note POV and OR content of the Russian-Georgian war article and its pro-Georgian emphasis. Despite being Georgian, I would recommend to have it deleted. Thanks, +So, Belorusian or Belorussian? This discussion is clearly in the wrong place. It has no relation to the [[Battle of Berlin]. It has relation to the naming of the country at this period of time. It doesn't matter hwow the Front is named in other books. There should be consisitency throughout wikipedia how we name the country it that period of time, when there was no Internet. Please move the discussion to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, with references from talk pages with the names related to Byelorussian SSR. As for me, you can vote to call the country White Ruthenian SSR, if you prove yourself, but once you reach the decision, please make the corresponding changes for consistency. I spent innumeral days in chasing all versions to have a single name, so that the aricles could be linked together. If you will destroy my work back into chaos by randomly changing the name here and there, I will restore it. My sole goal is consistency and linkedness of information, unlike the mentioned Kyiv/Kiev thingy. 17:44, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC) If you are military experts, then please write the missing articles, and continue naming discussions on the corresponidng pages. Happy New Year! 17:44, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC) +Album pushed back The album will be released on USA in November 17th according to Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/She-Wolf-Shakira/dp/B002LIKMB6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s;=music&qid;=1253471852&sr;=1-1 +Hi, take a look please. +FUCK FUCKITY FUCK FUCK FUCK +Why has the reference link to Hydra and Minerva been taken off, without this reference few people are going to understand what the systems are for and what part they play in NPIA training. I personally added the sections Serious Crime Analysis, Crime Operational Suppport, National Missing Persons Bureau, Traing and the technology section,. However when it comes to referencing my work or proividing links I have been prevented from doing so and the page is put back to the sections I originally added. Can this page not be added to, what is wrong with a reference explaining what minerva and hydra are, indeed what was wrong with a link to the Metropolitan Police Crime Academy, one of the most important crime fighting academies in the UK, and which has close links and operational ties with the NPIA. It seems to me that petty moderating is destroying any attempt to even reference or explain such points in any detail. +" ""President"" is an occupation, not an honorary style of address like ""His Eminence"". It's fine to call LBJ ""President Johnson"", as President was his occupation. But we would not call him ""The Honorable President Johnson"" or anything. Similarly, we can call the cardinal ""Cardinal Francis Arinze"" to provide context to the mention of his name. But ""His Eminence Cardinal Francis Arinze"" is unnecessary. Hope that helps. By the way, if you intend to contribute regularly, you might wish to create an account. (t) " +I think that is far too wordy and digressive, and I wasn't aware that Hugo Chavez had become an authority on democratic standards. I want a paragraph that begins The Cuban government and its supporters maintain that Cuba is a democracy, because ... and then sets out in 100 words why Cuba is a democracy. +cookies Thanks for the cookies. you are very sweet. I think im done editing at wikipedia though. Just way to much drama. But again thanks for the nice message. its greatly appreciated. thats me! +" Wow, you're complaining to me now? 13 days after I replied? It is up to any editor on Wikipedia to consider whether an article is within reason to post as speedy deletion. Since I was not the person who actually deleted the article, only the person who suggested to have the article deleted, please do not gripe on my talk page telling me how I should or should not contribute to Wikipedia. If you have further questions, please contact the administrator responsible for deleting your article. Please also note: If you have problems with other people editing or deleting your material, don't post it. I didn't come up with that either. It's one of Wikipedia's many policies. I suggest you read up. ''talk ♦ contribs'' " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Heart of Darkness. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +So, am i block or something? cause I already had a 'statement' on the matter...you know, i wanted to showboat and be happy I was joining Nishi and Ash in exile... +LOBSTER DUDE I AM SO FRIGGIN [LOBSTER]ED RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOU LOBSTERED I AM. 146.115.66.68 +1871-SEP-mid - (Old) Bethpage Brickworks in operation +Elbing disambig Any objections to redirecting Elbing to Elbląg (primary meaning)? Template:Redirect3 can be used to take care of SMS Elbing. +" John Mark Karr quote ""You wanna rape us John Mark Karrs? You wanna rape us Debra Lafaves? Fuck you."" The source cited has the entire word before ""you"" blotted out. Is there an uncensored source, or are we just assuming it is ""fuck""? Although it would make the most sense from context, to be sure, we cannot make such an assumption in an encyclopedia. Either the word should be blotted out or a reliable, first-hand, uncensored source must be added." +Listing another game name is NOT a problem, so don't remove it. +" Cajjmere Hi, Bearcat! Would you re-visit Cajjmere Wray? a) I'm not sure he's notable, and b) there's no reference for his being gay. Thanks! (talk | contribs) " +BLP Violations Please refrain from putting libellous accusations in Wikipedia, as you have done twice to Bob Woffinden see the policy on Biographies of Living Persons at WP:BLP +Rating We just got a B rating for this article! Which is excellent! More work to do and we'll have a featured article! +":Page numbers aren't essential. Obviously, it makes it hard for others to later check things - but they're not a requirement (except for the higher article ratings). Of course, it does beg the question how you know the info is in the book, if you don't have access to it ;-) but, we always assume good faith around here; as long as you can assure us the info comes from a specific published book, that will suffice. I guess you're referring to Jessamyn West (librarian) - apparently her Wikipedia user ID is .  ►  " +" Could it be you support terrorism and want to find a way to attack Israel using deliberate mistranslation and anti-semitic ramblings as a wedge? Accusations of Jews as ""Nazis"" seem like something you and your hezbollah friends do a lot of." +" I've created a new template to put a multi-column table inside a table cell. See my changes to Spain at the 2008 Summer Olympics. The basketball, handball, and field hockey rosters are placed into two columns, so the length of those rows is no worse than a nine-name list (like the synchro swimming team). If we get rid of the ""Medals by sport"" table to the right, then there would be room for three columns of names, making the team rosters even more compact vertically. —  (talk · contribs) " +Perfect page for this picture.!!!!!! +Sites in other languages that might hold useful information +And welcome from me also. I have improved your article on Scouting in Humberside but it needs more. Please do not copy information from the web site. Look at some of the other county articles. Have a look also at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting. +All right, I completely understand and won't try and start creating and editing the main pages directly. I was careless but I should have been given a warning before I was blocked. I will now use sandbox and only publish if the article has notability. Thanks for support +This section is also rather a mess. It is supposed to be about scepticism and debate, but is mostly about 'awareness'. The section, if about scepticism and debate, should briefly summarise the reasons that sceptics give, with brief replies if necessary, and a link to a sub-article that discuss sceptical issues in more detail. I would put this on the GW talk page, but someone called Tony Sidaway insists on deleting anything I put there. If you read what I say, it is mostly about the logic of the article, and explaining the issues in a clear way that ordinary people can understand, rather than a litany of which scientists and organisations support the hypothesis. +" Thank you for reviewing the DYK. The source I used for the grit segment was the second Damerow book, Storey's Guide to Raising Chickens: 4th Edition. I mistakenly gave both Damerow sources the same refname (), so the second Damerow source didn't initially show up on the References list. I apologise for the confusion. (t) " +WT*? You threaten to block me, but you refuse to pull the trigger even after i posted man tits on your page. Are you even an admin? tell you what, it's 9:47. If you don't block me in 3 minutes, you are officially a biyatch.-SOS +Minor detail Should it be mentioned that Barack Obama and Martin Luther King Jr. are/were both proponents of communism, according to many reliable sources? +" Autor Hi, Jmoliver. In this old edit, you said this picture was taken by a certain ""Carlos Torres Morales"". Can you remember where did you took that information from? " +{{unblock| A warning should have been sufficient; I have been well warned. I will never again call attention to the tactics used by editors here. But my frustrations were caused by what seemed to be harassment of other editors here who seem to be operating in good faith, and who are repeatedly called names and having their edits reverted for what seem to be biased reasons. If you look at my history, I am not a vandal or a threat to anybody here, and all of my edits have been intelligent, sourced, and in good faith. I request to be unblocked, and I do promise that in future I will not talk about other editors here in any way, I will stick to the edits themselves. I am learning about Wikipedia every day, and didn't realize that such remarks would be considered offensive (they would be accepted, for instance, in an internet forum). Now I know.} +Thank you. I did reply, I wonder if the spam filter ate it. I still can't edit, I get a message about my IP address recently being browsed by me and therefore being blocked. But I appreciate you reverting your decision, and no apology needed. And thanks TruSilver for getting involved too - +Much much better. 2 small reservations: I would use another word for attack near school - an incident for example (it wasn't something planned beforehand); and militants didn't just die, it should be rephrased somehow. +Thank you, Ckatz, for moving the editor-to-editor discussion to the discussion page, where you quite correctly point out it belongs. +And by the way I don't see this article making any use of the IPA HB for this topic anyway, so why don't you use it if you want to cite it to support your views? +Confirmation message. , 2004-09-05t10:36z Hi Jeandre. Edits from — | Talk 07:17, 2004 Sep 6 (UTC) Thanks note. , 2004-09-06t20:24z +The following policy is given in Wikipedia:Verifiability: ‘articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy’. On the other hand Wikipedia:No original research states ‘Examples of primary sources include... ...original philosophical works...’ and ‘Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation’ it also states at the end of the paragraph ‘Appropriate sourcing is a complicated issue, and these are general rules. The decision as to whether primary or secondary sources are more suitable on any given occasion is a matter of common sense and good editorial judgment, and should be discussed on article talk pages.’ The above enables me to derive some conclusions: What is mend by “third-party sources” (WP:V) is not exactly the same as “Tertiary sources” (NOR). If the policies do refer to the same they contradict each other, which probably is not the case. I think “third-party sources” are, placed in context, ‘other sources than Wikipedia itself and its editors’; this would make sense, given what follows directly after the line containing “third-party sources”: ‘Reliable sources are necessary [...] to substantiate material within articles...’ Vassyana said ‘Reliance on Rand directly is a NPOV concern...’ it is now clear that it is of no concern at all. Yes ‘an interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source’ but when the text of the citation speaks for itself no further interpretation is required. She also said ‘there is absolutely no need to rely heavily in any way on the primary material’ which is still argued, in contrast I say there is absolutely no reason not to rely heavily on the primary material. The arguments pro primary source material have, as of yet, not been given a response; the focus was on the demand to have (mainly) third-party sources. In the proper context primary sources are third-party sources, fulfilling the demand. Again ‘The decision as to whether primary or secondary sources are more suitable on any given occasion is a matter of common sense and good editorial judgment, and should be discussed on article talk pages.’ Let’s now focus on that. +":Careful, Gyrich may be watching! [[User talk:Trekphiler|listen, bub! ]] " +I HATE YOUR GUTS Lol ) +"==Copyright problems== Hello. Concerning your contribution, Whippersnapper gallery, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Whippersnapper gallery appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Whippersnapper gallery has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Whippersnapper gallery and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Whippersnapper gallery with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Whippersnapper gallery. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. " +" Parametrization request in the FAC... (?!? - cool stuff) " +~ That seems to make sense. A Church is an institution, and a church is a building. I suppose you would also therefore have Christian Churches and Christian churches. 90.193.97.18 +" Since ""hand washing"" is a generic word used for different TYPES of hand washing, and each specific hand washing has its own specific laws on how it should be performed (e.g. with or without a vessel; three intermittent times in the morning and with a vessel in most customs, etc.), the detail of the mitzvah can only be learned in the main body of the article. Customs also differ with different Jewish ethnic groups. I think that ""negel vasser"" and the three pourings is the generally accepted practice in the morning (in most Jewish homes), although the kabbalists add a fourth pouring. This, as noted, is explained in the body of the main article. " +OK il be sure to add the correct citations. I have a friend who also has access to Nielson Soundscan and he uploads it to a website. Il be sure to apply the correct citations. Thanks. +The Finnish vandal was here. +James Woodcock podcast, Feb 16 '13 +" Btw Alexikoua Vurgut isn't an alternative name, it means of Vurgu in Albanian. talk " +Ugh... I can see what I'm up against already. Just stay away from subjects that you may know little or nothing about (Lennon)and I will do the same. +":: Agreed. The ""backlash"" against the MRM is notable and deserves it's own subsection. " +" I did find an image on line of a monumental scupture of Perry in a hall. It may be at the Internatioal Perry memorial. (☎) " +I re-assert my position as well. This simply does not belong in the storms section of the 2006 AHS for reasons stated in the previous discussion. It is not a storm of the 2006 AHS per NHC. Simple enough? +Ok - I understand - the unsourced part is the dates. Is it considered unsourced if I copied the dates directly off another Wikipedia page (the Solomon and Jehoshaphat pages to be exact)? This is why I included the Wikipedia links on their names. Or do you guys not want circular thinking? Either is fine, just trying to crack the nut. Ckruschke +Loonatics Hello. Your recent edit to Loonatics Unleashed has been identified as vandalism and reverted. Do not remove content and/or replace it with nonsense. ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. +TfD nomination of Template:Video Template:Video has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Video the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. The nominator Chris Cunningham/User:Thumperward removed the template from all the articles and then nominated it for deletion. This is a well-known Wikipedia:Ownership gambit by stealth removing a feature with mass edits and then claiming it's not used as a reason for deletion. He then reverted my attempt to keep the video template on an article page at least until the deletion discussion is completed. This prevents editors from making any comparisons on the technical merits of the template, which further forces you to accept his ownership of articles presenting videos. I have requested a Speedy Keep due to his unconsensed mass edits, until there can be an informed and un-owned editorial discussion on the technical merits. Until he again re-reverts, you can at least temporarily revert his edit to see what the video template looked like, and then consider the technical issues on their merits which are described at the template deletion discussion. +but the is minor but it affect the whole page and forgot to check. ~~~~ +" I doubt that 300m English-speaking Americans know what a gyro is. But I would guess that you're right that the name ""gyros"" is more common in the US than ""doner"" or ""shawarma"". However, though this is an English-language Wikipedia, it is not a US Wikipedia. And I think it would be more contentious to unify under gyro or shawarma than doner kebab. " +U r a poopy little girl +Because this article is a classic POV Fork. +I have removed the Newcomb quote - it makes absolutely no sense to me. I know what GRAS is and I know exactly how ingredients are listed and declared and it is like talking in circles. Well, duh, you don't have to list the composition of beef, for example. An ingredients label is just that - ingredients - not a chemical analysis of every last molecule of the product. If it was an exact chemical analysis of the product, only the very largest companies could ever afford to put a product on the market. You do realize, COOKING creates free glutamate in nearly any product that contains protein. (Specially, glutamaic acid.) I have also removed the precautions section. It contains statements that I believe are unsubstantiated. Addictive? How so. Cite the mechanism. Psychologically addictive? Physically addictive? Furthermore, even if accurate, it is written using verbiage that tends to be fear-mongering. +" Well, first off, welcome to Wikipedia. As far as I know that's under the additional ""Expert"" rules for more advanced play. I just looked over our section that deals with it and althought we have it already it isn't too terribly clear about the fortification rule you were talking about. I plan on clearing it up in the next day or two but for now I was just wondering in the 2003 rulebook, does it only mention altering the value of risk card sets, the fortification rule, and limiting armies per territory or are any other ones included? Thanks. " +For handarails see Image:Millenium Park.jpg, and Image:BP Pedestrian Bridge.jpg. (t/c//WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ant. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  – scent " +REDIRECT Talk:Mitsubishi A6M Zero +So you believe ALL facts belong in the article. Including what bush had for breakfast last thursday, or what the wing speed of a hummingbird is. What a moron. Are you serious? The wing speed of a hummingbird has NOTHING to do with George Bush! The fact taht you said that is pure idiocy! Also, what Bush has for breakfast(remember, we start names with UPPER CASE) has nothing to do with anything. However, a quote that he made in a public speech with the American people is VERY relevant! You clearly have no brain. Are you GW's friend or something? +Template:Did you know nominations/Tectonics of the South China Sea Crisco, I was wondering whether you could take a look at this one: the reviewer, who's fairly new, is asking for help related to image issues, and you're the person I thought of. If you'd like to cast your eyes over the rest of it just to be sure its okay, that would be great, too. Thanks. +""", except for you because you know nothing about music charts and high quality images. " +e-mail you?!! hehe you're so cute when you take yourself so seriously. +" Oh, really? No comment/blocks for me being harassed? - Chat " +Hey How are you? +See you See you later dickhead hope you never come back!! +Some other admin and some other checkuser may wish to review this, but while checking another user, it seemed clear to me one person created several user accounts in quick succession and/or used several accounts in close succession on several different IPs: :==( o ) +":::Haha, I see what you mean; just tryin' to make sure you understood. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ " +" Mikan As far as I know, mikan isn't a Japanese word for citrus, although ""mikan rui"" is the general classification for citrus plants. I looked at the dictionary quoted and neither the Japanese to English nor the Japanese to Japanese entries supports your assertion. " +It's military history and an article entry in an encyclopedia, not a dictionary definition. Wikipedia shouldn't score so high on search engines if attacks like these continue. +Ok I been doing other articles related to Ruth as well to at least B class, so once it gets nominated we don't want the readers to go to a poorly written article. I took care of Jack Warhop in a day, he gave up Ruth's first two career home runs. Someone should expand Jack Dunn for obvious reasons, I'm looking at Bob Shawkey, as my next quick focus and rewriting the Red Sox section by next week. I got 23 days until school starts so I have plenty of time to finish the section of his playing career. account +Convert to Puritanism or die? The bit about forced conversions on the sometimes enforced threat of death need some reference, it does not seem plausible. +If I follow you, I think Roman Catholic is preferable to Catholic alone to refer to the church in communion with the bishop of Rome (whether talking about before Luther or after). +GoodDay, you were quite right, there is now a move at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed_topic_ban_of_Martin_Hogbin. You do not need to become heavily involved but could you just point out that I am not a lone crazy editor but one of a group who disgree with the current content and that I have now proposed a compromise solution. +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!" +}} {{merged-from | Mars Pathfinder Rover | 14:47, 20 June 2008‎| talk=no +]] Gutcruncher now at [[User:Mathewignash/Gutcruncher +Why delete my original submission, I thought this site was for people to edit with constructive points? +REDIRECT Talk:Thomas Reynolds (Australian politician) +Give me a break. I'm calling a pedophile a pedophile and you're saying there are no laws against it? I would suggest you do the same and make out with a 13-year old girl to test the law but that's revolting and hope that you don't and cannot fathom your defense of this. Yes, child molesters are pedophiles and those who are committing this crime are pedophiles. You're...I just don't have words for someone like you defending pedophiles on MY talk page. GTFO. +September 2006 (UTC) That's his problem Howcheng. He CAN'T make the article more neutral. He wants to make Westerfield out to be a martyr for the wrongfully convicted. Just look into their contributions - it's all Westerfield. They don't care about wikipedia. They don't care about accuracy. Their sole concern is for the child-killer to go free. If I were you Howcheng I would block them. Also block there Sockpuppet (internet) Freedomsring and Currious1. 01:40, 6 +proof outline It is possible to write down this formula: This is an alternative way to group the sum of the squares: to quote an example, we assume n=5: In this representation the number five is summed 5 times, the number 4 is summed 4 times, and so on, until zero. After that, it is possible to use this result to solve the summation: The main formula is equivalent to After some agebraic manipulation it is possible to obtain: This is equivalent to the desired formula. 86.24.46.135 +Maybe the problem is that the article in its current state seems to discuss its subject mostly from a feminist perspective, rather than that there is any specific problem with the inclusion of the section about a feminist perspective on it? In other words, maybe you need to focus on finding, and adding, reliable sources for aspects other than the feminist perspective. (talk) +"|decline=No reason for unblock provided. '''rolls''' " +" wikiproject Thanks for the invite. Sorry, I should have replied to your earlier... I had a guy who was following me around, and nominating articles I started for deletion. It felt almost like he was stalking me. He accused me, a number of times, or having a ""posse"", who reversed his edits. I probably shouldn't have paid any attention to him. " +This all price if you forget about it, then We Will Deliver/Setup/Skirting/AC/Wiki Location. You will be licensed under CC-BY Call 704 in this wiki for more information. +LEAVE 4 A FUKIN SNAK AND I RETRN WITH A FUKIN BLCK YOU ARE ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL FUKERSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK YOU SUCK DICK +If you had bothered to read the edits you censored, you would have noticed that I reduced the claim to what I could support with rigorous references, and yet you continued to revert my material. The connection with the CIA is not merely 'interesting', it is a key development in the LSD story, and to omit it from the intro is to skew the article unacceptably. Funny how so many of those who cry 'conspiracy' are so happy to skew and censor publicly known facts. +. We may have to take this to ArbCom +Jam Sebastian]]March 1 2015]== Shawarma32 Wow, you really want this person die in advance. Please stop giving death dates to a living person. You were too offensive. ==[[ +" Of those listed above, I'm only not comfortable with doing nothing or saying ""embassies are in Tel Aviv"" as that fails to connect to the dispute on Jerusalem's status as capital. The other suggestions are in my opinion OK. NMMNG, it does make a difference if your arguments are viable or not. If you're simply saying ""no because no"" or ""no because only Israel's POV matters"", you're not presenting reasoned objections, just objections. Cheers, " +then leave the fazlur rahman khan article the way it is. do not delete it. +I've written a stub for this type of poor relief see indoor relief +even though they might.I have also been busy the last week or so and have not had the time to really consider this; I won't be less busy until at least Monday night North American Eastern time (and today is not good, either, since I have to go out for much of it +Passing admins - please note the attitude of this deeply biased pro-IRA editor who believes that admins are at his beck and call and will attempt to crush anyone who dares to try to make the IRA page more neutral. I have attempted to warn other users of Wikipedia about his total prejudice but been repeatedly threatened by him, to the extent that I believe my life may be in danger. I suspect that he will attempt to mobilise an IRA death squad against me and my family. +" The thing is, if the words ""India rubber"" are given a piped link, the user will be taken directly to a page titled ""Natural rubber"", which might confuse them, but if the words ""India rubber"" are linked as they stand, the user will be taken to the same page, but additionally bearing the text (Redirected from ) which explains why they were taken there. It is indeed unlikely that India rubber will ever be a separate article from Natural rubber; but that's not a reason in itself. " +" New 2012 study by Mark Regnerus, sociology professor at the University of Texas A new study conducted by Mark Regnerus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas has revealed, among other things, that 40% of children (aged 18 to 39) whose parents are homosexual have had an affair while married or cohabiting, compared to only 13% of children from heterosexual families. It also showed that 23% of children whose parents are lesbian or gay have been touched sexually by a parent or an adult, compared to 2% of children from heterosexual families, and that 31% of them have had sex against their will, compared to 8% from heterosexual families. The study stresses, however, that it would be wrong to conclude from its data that the abuser was necessarily one of the parents, or that the abuse had anything to do with the parent's sexual orientation. The study also shows that 12% of those with lesbian parents and 24% of those with homosexual fathers have considered suicide, compared to 5% of those from heterosexual families. Children with homosexual parents are also more than twice as likely to be in therapy ""for a problem connected with anxiety, depression or relationships"" - 19% of children compared to 8% of children from heterosexual families. Furthermore, 20% of children with lesbian parents and 25% of children with homosexual fathers have had a sexually transmitted disease, compared to 8% of children from heterosexual families. 28% of children with lesbian parents and 20% of children with homosexual fathers are currently unemployed compared to 8% of children from heterosexual families. Adult children with homosexual parents are also more likely to smoke marijuana and to get arrested. Due to the findings, it is very controversial, and that is why my edit here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homosexuality_and_psychology&diff;=497579176&oldid;=497039907 and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_parenting&diff;=497585303&oldid;=497583187 has been undone, simply because another user disagreed and claimed the study is: ""widely criticized and flawed."" Criticized by whom? It is a new study, nobody had yet written an article debunking it. Flawed according to whom? Your personal opinion? That is not a reason to vandalise the article and undo my edit. The study is published and available here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X12000610 The fact that this is not allowed on the article prior a ""discussion"" is unfair. What difference does it make? They are findings from a study; how could a ""talk"" about it make any difference? Do we have to come to an ""agreement"" to put this information into the article itself? And if we don't, we will just ignore it and purposely leave the study out of the article, because somebody's opinion about it disagrees? This is not objective and completely unprofessional, not to mention biased. This is nothing more than intentionally leaving a study out of the article because somebody disagrees with the findings. There is no valid, honest, objective reason to remove this information from the article, yet I was forced to open a ""talk"" about it because of no other reason than somebody not liking the results of the study. This is unacceptable, yet here I am anyway, opening a ""talk"" about it. So, what is there to discuss? Your opinion disagreeing with the results? That is not a reason and is completely subjective. In other words, it is irrelevant. There is absolutely nothing to talk about." +Oi Wankstain == Fuck off you ignorant cunt, yeah? Revert this you arsewipe, REVERT ME LOLOLOLOL == +" RE (earlier remark, edit-conflict): 'Controversy' is hardly an encyclopedial word. Should be avoided and Templated like, say, ""Trivia"". Or see WP:WEASEL. Let's improve. - " +Image copyright problem with Image:BloodOfEden.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:BloodOfEden.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk) +" Oh I get it, ""finished with"" unless your incredibly apparent bias looking back at your contribs is overturned. Wikipedia is at the mercy of cabals led by admins like you and is frankly so much rubbish. What a bloody shower you all are. " +Yay! Here's a cookie... oh wait I ate them all. ^_^; Well, rain check on that cookie. ) +"==Sockpuppetry case== You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TomPhan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  talk " +Lack of criticism Many media figures, black and white, have criticised Kwanzaa for its origins and its inventor's history. This is notably absent from the article, despite being an important and relevant encyclopaedic issue. The fact that this is so clearly omitted is evidence that there is significant bias in this article's authorship. This must be rectified. 60.226.138.94 +List of channels on Sky Digital in the UK and Ireland +It's probably true, but it can't be included without a reliable source. ♠Dil +The team name is Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Your blind reverts are nonsensical. +i still cannot figure out why... Black people love KFC. +I did use that hint during a game of taboo though, and it was a really gnarly hint. +":Interesting 208, to add to your list: Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatories NSAIDS Data from metanalysis of gastrointestinal complicationsrelated to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Gabrie et al., 1991) Serious GI event 3.2/1000 subjects (age 65+) .39/1000 subjects (age <65) 1/1000 subjects (all ages) NaprosynData from Physicians' desk reference; selected complications based on reports in clinical trials, in the literature, adn on voluntary reports since marketing GI bleeding and or perforation - <1/100 Renal failure - <1/100 Congestive heart failure - <1/100 " +DYK nomination of Iron railing Hello! Your submission of Iron railing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! +" Could you help me with ? I wan tto add a teb to send the test-n messages, but I can't get it to work. Thanks, talk " +" Their claims are unworthy of further investigation. Encyclopedias are about truth, not about the delusions of obsessed Jew-haters. ""Obstructing research"" what research? ""Discrediting their merit"" what merit? What historical truths have deniers uncovered? What illumination have they brought to the darkness of the Third Reich? Pfui. ∇∆∇∆ " +And people say Wikipedia is not a forum. +" Further, you are however, allowed to cite the diff in which they originally made the comment, or quote the original comment with a cited diff.— dαlus Contribs " +" Los_Angeles_Pollution.jpg file in Rachel Carson film? Dear David, I love your photo ""http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Los_Angeles_Pollution.jpg"" and would like to use it in a Rachel Carson video that I'm currently working on. I filmed several notable authors, scientists, and historians at a couple of events dedicated to the life and work of Rachel Carson, and I'm creating an hour-long compilation video that I plan to sell as a DVD (and possibly other formats). I could use your picture under the creative commons license that you have listed except that I cannot adhere to the share-alike clause. Would it be possible for you to waive that clause for my aforementioned use? Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your reply. Sincerely yours, Mark Dixon markedixon {at} gmail {dot} com P.S. Thank you for your generous contribution to the Creative Commons! I have begun to make my own contributions to the space largely as a thank you to the work of contributors that I have used in other film projects. You can see my photos here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/9602574@N02/" +" Coverage of WFDC-TV from FCC.gov Coverage of WZDC-CA from FCC.gov Coverage of WMDO-CA from FCC.gov Also, WFDC-TV is the only station available on Cable (Comcast Channel 20) in Salisbury. - • Talk • November 2, 2008 @ 01:18" +Copyright tag This is concerning Image:Palau and oceania.jpg. As part of the Wikipedia:Untagged Images project, I have tagged it as possibly unfree because I could not determine its copyright status. It seems likely that it is in the public domain but I didn't have enough information to tag it that way. You can help this project by applying Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to all of your uploaded images. Thank you, — Edwin Stearns | Talk 18:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC) +I doubt that you even reviewed the block. If you did not investigate the events leading up to the block and the POV admining of Malik_Shabazz, you failed to carry out your responsibilities as an Administrator. +Beginning with your first edit, every talk page entry you have created seems to be full of arguments and vitriol. You seem to lack the ability to cooperate and work with others. This is required if you want to work on an encyclopedia. An indefinite block doesn't mean forever, it simply means that there is no single period of time that is guaranteed to prevent further disruption, so you've forced my hand here. As always, any admin is free to adjust without my prior permission. It is my hope that someone can convince you how to collaborate in a method that is consistent with our goals here. As it is, your methods are inconsistent with our mission. - 2¢ +i think it better not to have these images as these people don't represent what the overwhelming population look like and the qulaity of these images don't reach wikepdia standards and unnessary for this page. +DutiesPaid page Please do not delete +It works well where it is, but I may put a copy in the Objectivism article as well. It is speaking directly to Rand's ethical system with the voice of a qualified academic - surely that is what we all want. +Dai antagonized me with he comment of my 'first' page move. Then Snowded suggested I was a either a drunk or just plain stupid. They should be attacking me on those public talkpages & through their 'edi summaries'. I used to be a happy bloke, but Dai & Snowy continue to poke & provoke me, via stalking, harrassment & contant ABF. They treat me like dirt, on thos public pages. +One more comment - you can't select curves on the basis of R2's - they aren't reliable for model selection. You need to look at something else, like AIC. And, again - if you are extrapolating you need confidence intervals and you need an underlying model. Using simple curve-fitting to extrapolate so far beyond the data is not valid inference. +Also: the links for optometric subspecialties link to non-optometric topics. Either the links should be dropped or new topics on the actual optometric residencies should be initiated. I think it might be useful to actually describe what an OD residency consists of, as it is unlike medical residency, but more like a fellowship. +To be honest: SONY cannot complain about MJ's sales. Everybody who says MJ doesn't sell anymore is wrong. Check the soundscan/nielsen figures and you'll see Michael Jackson's weekly sales have been higher for months than Prince's(before his new album) and madonna's. (I think they are comparable artists). Figures are based on US sales. Weekly average is between 8 en 12.000 copies with highs after his acquittal, about 25.000 copies! +Personal attacks? Oh, I get it pointing out your flaws, and the flaws of Wikipedia, makes me an enemy. You have no idea. +TUSC token a513c889650ab4d3a2eefac4cd6cd5a6 == Token for TUSC account! == +I am deleting the quote about Beck and Marissa and Mrs. Hansen because the source on it is Vaginal Davis' blog, per WP:V blogs are not to be used as third party sources, especially about living persons. +What sort of damage? What's wrong with the article? +": English spelling is MATUSKA even in his ENGLISH birth certificate translation. There is no ""š"" in English, what is so hard to understand abouth it? So we can start renaming names of people from japan or china used in names of wiki articles, who will understand? Pmp" +" If you look in the page history it says that (someone must of removed this text): Note: *denotes anachronisms; these characters (or, in the cases of characters such as Tinker Bell and Marvin the Martian, the animated versions of them that appear in the film) were created and/or first appeared after 1947. But as screenplay writer Peter S. Seaman said, ""The aim was entertainment, not animation history."" There were a few notable Golden Age characters such as Popeye and Tom and Jerry missing from the movie due to legal copyright issues. 96.244.254.20 " +Tony, you don't have to lie like this. It is not hard to see your association with Cyde. Don't make it worse by lying about it. +What is your name and editor that is valid on Wikipedia.com ... the IP should match editors.gc.ca 24.141.16.221 +fIRST i LOVE TO EAT BALLS BIG HAIRY ONES +Regarding Your Message Can you please be more specific instead of just shouting at me? +It's in the other articles because the other articles are wrong. +Yeah, I fixed it Sort of. I'm slowly moving stuff back. I've been kind of busy trying to stop an edit war here and here. It's has been a mess. What's up with you?talk▶ +user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking user: user:precious Roy go away and bother someone else, you are not wanted here, stop stalking +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Discrimination, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - [talk] +" Happy New Year, Spartaz! "" class=""plainlinks""> Spartaz,Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Read! Talk! " +nigger faggot read the entire reference before you talk your nigger-loving shit. +I agree the article looks much better now, I hated having all that information in the way. Should I get to removing all the unsourced information from religous articles while you nail down the rest of the videogames?- +created a concrete detailed drawing for electronic Television. See this picture: http://www.televisionexperimenters.com/resource/swinton1.gif and see this: http://www.manhattanrarebooks-science.com/swinton.htm Swinton +tense confusion the article is written in the past tense, but powerhouse is very much alive and well. requires cleanup, perhaps? 195.50.80.61 +Marbury School I note that you wrote the article. Do you have any connection with the school? Do you know what happened to it? And the teachers? +what the fuck u doing? i just edited all those pages +Per the proposed guideline at WP:NART. +", and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  WikiProject Mixed martial arts Ever thought of joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts? I noticed you have lots of MMA related edits. We are now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive, please add your input to decide what the first collaboration should be. I probably should get around to joining at some point. I don't think I have the time right now to contribute much to the article improvement drive, but I keep my eye on several MMA-related articles for vandalism, nonsense, etc. I'll probably throw my name in the members section. I'll second that, your contributions show you've made a lot of positive edits to MMA-related articles. Keep up the good work! 718 Fine, fine, if you're gonna twist my arm...in a kimura... Adam Copeland There is a move discussin going on at the talk page of Adam Copeland, I thought you would be interested in it. Great job! ...catching that linkspammer and reverting vandalism in general. Have you thought about trying out Twinkle? It makes vandalism reversion much easier, and also streamlines warning users.  .718 at 01:26, September 12, 2007  Looks interesting! I may have to check that out... Arbitrary revision reverting If you are going to reverse a revision that has been researched and well crafted, be consistent across the board. Compare content with other similar entries which are considered acceptable, then rethink your actions. Read the Muhammed Ali, Fedor Emelianenko, Chuck Liddell biographies for examples of what is considered relevant information, particularly regarding fight descriptions. Make changes to all of those wiki entries if you feel that your standards should be universally accepted. Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I'm sure Tuckdogg will get around to cleaning up those articles too. .718 at 20:17, September 25, 2007 is correct, at least as to the Liddell/Fedor pages. Chuck hasn't been on my watchlist, but I think I should add him. I've copied the MMA portion of my watchlist to for your use... just visit and paste at the bottom... there's probably a few leftovers from other topics though. .718 at 00:41, September 26, 2007 Holy friggin' crap, dude! Suddenly my watchlist doesn't look so insanely large! Tim Sylvia's Page I was the one rev +" You're kinda revealing exactly what sort of side you stance on when you're trying to imply that Vani Hari isn't anti-science. serenC " +and your little dog, too! +": Why is this 'criticism' even included? It's not substantive. It's just rhetoric and strawman: he writes ""instead of surrendering to the terror"" when obviously no one is suggesting that as a course of action; he claims ""anti-forestry scare tactics"" with no justification or evidence. This section should be deleted. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bonobo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +(at least I think they were admin) +" Radiocarbon dating Most writings on the DSS say they are mostly dated between 150 BCE and 70 CE. I see the section on radiocarbon dating here mostly falls in that general line (that is also used at the start of this article). I see that one radiocarbon dating cited here says they fall between 385 BCE to 82 CE with ""68%"" reliability (not sure of the correct term used for this part of the dating). Does anyone know a lot about these dating methods? I'm guessing since the 150 BCE to 70 CE is the usual range always given, the 385 BCE is an outlier (as I've never heard any number going back beyond 200 BCE in anything I've read) not sure how this relates to the 68% number provided on that as well. Just wondered if anyone had any background info on that as it can be seen as contradictory (with the usual 150 BCE- 70 CE dating given everywhere else). " +Crepy Air reconnaissance on the fronts of the VII Corps and X Reserve Corps on 31 August reported that the British were retreating south of the Aisne towards Crépy-en-Valois. The five of the II Cavalry Corps were sent towards Crépy on 1 September and encountered British troops who repulsed an attack on the village. The 1st Army had attempted to trap British rearguards at Crépy and Villers-Cotterêts but they had slipped away. Air reconnaisssance revealed that British olumns were moving south from the area south-west of Villers-Cotterêts, south of Crépy and from Creil. +Archiving Old Discussions I'm currently working on archiving old discussions, discussions that have stopped, unsigned discussions that did not ilicit a response and so forth. I don't have time to do it all at once, but will be a slow process. Anyone wishing to help, or improve the formatting, is most welcome. | Talk +remember when you deleted my page? i do. +All I have to say is that Cleary is an ... +Thank you! Wishing 1916 will be good for too. +Land Area The land area mentioned in this article seems like way too much even at the Ottoman Empires greatest extent. Comapre the 19.9 million km2 stated in this article to modern day Russia which is only 17 million km2, or even the Roman Empire, which included most of the Ottoman territories, 5.9 million km2. +Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lindsay Lohan Why the hell should I have to have an account to create this page? Lindsay Lohan is not FA-quality because it fails Wikipedia:Why stable versions, WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:NPOV at the very least, and requires de-listing. +Your remarks The content you were debating on Volksdeutsche article was not the edit that I made today. I suggest you be more carefull with threats of sanctions, +Please do not overwrite the existing Tom Lyons article with a biography about another person. If the boxer you are writing about is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, please create a new article. See the guide on writing your first article. Thank you. +going to release as albums when they are ready to have the biopic go into production sometime in this decade. +There is an exception for user's own talk page. +Sun (with Solaris) always distributed the original software, the same applies to Slackware. Recently, most Linux distributions started to distribute the original cdrtools again. Debian did agree on Marh 6th 2009 (at CeBIT) to distribute the original cdrtools again (although Debian is soooooo slooooow with doing the right things and we are still waiting for the contract to be implemented by Debian - the binary packages are waiting for integration since 5 months) and Suse distributes cdrtools again since two months. It seems that only RedHat defies to do things to the benefit of the users. The attack against the cdrtools project that created the fork seems to have been revealed as an attack against the Linux users as it is obvious that Linux users do not like to be forced to use a buggy fork while the maintained original software is legally available. +June 2011 (UTC) +1 10:15, 20 +we dont like u from wat I've read alot of people dont like wat ur doing (deleting well written articles) u should be taken off wikipedia.I guess u will block me for speakin the truth! +So make one then +" Jack Clift Hello Number 57, I would appreciate it if you would respond to me concerning the article ""Jack Clift"". Can you please repost or send me the article that you deleted? thank you, Ben" +Cluttering this article with the card game and detailed calender information and cultural impact is a bad idea. I've reverted Folken's redirecting which did not even re-insert the content. I'm working on this and considering over 100+ reference works on Gundam exist, sourcing is not a problem for just about anything in its universe. Clean up begins at the top and moves down. +", 18 November 2005 (UTC) Come on, Panache, your attack is not good faith. I certainly do beleive that discrimination is a major factor in these riots. There are many serious sources stating this. Therefore I would certainly support putting something about ""discrimination"" in the opening sentence. 10:42" +Magical Realism Reconsidered I'm looking forward to working with your class during the semester - if you have any questions about the project or Wikipedia in general, please feel free to leave me a note at User talk:Awadewit. Wikipedians are here to help you! +" Random Do we need to conform to the Low/High rating or can we change the Random Chance to ""entire"" or ""complete"", since Candy Land is all luck (minus cheating, of course)" +" Removing warnings is fine – ignoring them is not. Their language and appearance is (primarily) not mine – it is from templates that reflect what the community has decided is appropriate. It is not a single small issue, but several, repeated issues (please do see the diffs I provided and the content to which they refer). I am doing nothing more than replying to what the three of you brought to my talk page. I do believe that the next edit showing ignorance of the repeated warnings, and now discussion by multiple editors, should be dealt with more strongly, per policy. His attitude has shown very little indication that he would accept mentoring, but it is good of you to attempt it. I wish you luck. —[]— " +I think what you're saying boils down to a higher percentage of white people have the good sense to use contraception, Babydaddy. And there is no connection between sunlight and calcium. Black women have a higher abortion rate than white women. Africa has NEVER been in Asia. Sorry you had a suck school for 4th grade. +" Cynwulfe and Davidiad, I think you got a fine piece of work here. I'll do a review. Let me get a couple of quick and simple questions out of the wayI hope you don't mind a piecemeal approach; I find that it helps to get things out of the way on a first read. Why Tzetzes, and not John Tzetzes? I clicked through to see if it was a title that needed to be italicized. Also, I'm a great fan of the appositive/adjectival introduction, ""the twelfth-century Byzantine poet and grammarian John Tzetzes"" (and in that case you can drop John). ""The poet completes his treatment""we don't know the poet's gender, and the appropriate section says nothing about it. Consider that the poetic phallus is not a penis. ) More later: apparently laundry takes precedence over poetry. I know, it's a fucked-up world. Done. Thanks, Drmies. It was just Tzetzes because that's what I call him, forgetting that even some classicists have never read of him (and that his poor brother Isaac wallowed with him).   { t } Do we need to do the GA subpage thang?   { t } I don't know, DavidiadI just started the template and it looks like hell. If you can fix it that'd be great. This isn't some fill in the blank kind of thing. Also, please define ""verse"" at its first occurrence, possibly connecting it with ""line"" which is wikilinked nearby. Stuck in a link to dactylic hexameter for now. Currently making dinner—will think of a more graceful and efficient way to keep the concepts of verse and stichometry at the fore: this while trying to retain the ridiculous construction ""in part or entire"" which strains the copulative properties of ""survive"".   { t } " +" Block Hi Will. I am hoping you can help it seems both my ip (which I have obviously changed) and my ""matriarchal"" account - have been blocked by the admin below for the reasons stated: You have been blocked for continued edit warring on the TM article after being warned. Plus your account is only three days old and you're already making threats and and personal attacks. Use this 72 hours to figure out how to edit constructively in a consensus based environment. — • Talk • I was never ""warned"" and I am struggling to see the personal attacks - except those made to me repeatedly. You are also aware, I think, that edit waring was being done by the others - and the original edit was done as part of the being bold editing process. The removal of the primary sources was of course correct under med referencing guidelines, the users were told in advance and the person really involved in the edit war agreed with their removal!!. I suspect, that the admin in question has not even bothered to read the page - they certainly didn't notice an admin around or the the page was being monitored as part of informal arbitration, or that LB is my second login! Anyway, I was hoping - if of course you agree with me - that you might have a ""whisper in their ear like"" and explain the background of the situation. I think, as can be clearly seen how, without trying, I can circumnavigate the IP ban, that if I had wished to truly be a ""disruptive influence"" it would not be very difficult. Anyway, if you think it is worth pursuing on my behalf please do and if not, well at least it may get them doing something constructive with the article. During the ""ban"" I will not - although I easily could, do anymore editing - indeed I may simply not bother fullstop. Namaste " +Could You Be a Bigger Dick if you Tried ? LMAO- locking pages dude ? Dude, it's Wikipedia, not Encyclopedia Brittanica. Were you this much fun in high school too ? Killing the buzz of some Tampa fans trying to have fun with our new coach's page. Oh wait, you're an Eagles fan - nevermind. I bet you're as fat as Andy Reid too. +This message is regarding the page Hautes Fagnes. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. | Talk +I delete any that I can find. If you find one, please place at the top and an administrator will review it. Thanks! +But now I've been blocked because TMDrew wrongly filed a report, and I've been reported on the same thing by the same user, twice, getting twice the penalty. +Brigham Young University Wikiproject This new wikiproject has been proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Brigham Young University. Please sign up in order to improve the quality of BYU related articles on wikipedia, including BYU-Idaho and BYU-Hawaii. Thanks. +Translation Being exposed to the two traditions, I am unable to decide which one covers best the definition.How we define freedom itself depends upon various factors - culture, education, environment and individuals own understanding on where the voluntary freedom ends and the legal begins.However, let us see how the French definition reads into English.I admit, this falls beyond my area of specialisation and could possibly be literal in places Freedom is the sense of acting according to one's own will without being restrained by the power of anyone else.It is defined negatively as the absence from submission,servitude,constraint exercised by someone else. positively as: the autonomy and spontaniety of a rational being;the voluntary human behaviours are based on freedom and qualified as Free This notion is seen as an abstract and normative value of the human actions and at the same time like a solid reality.These two perspectives are interwoven in many ways and could lead to errors of categorisation.There are, therefore, numerous confusions that can arise with respect to the term Freedom.So,it is necessary to distinguish the different sense of this word. The Freedom could be taken as an attribute of the Human Being, of his will and be the condition of natural and positive rights, but also his duties;the effective realisation of the voluntary acts has a dimension that could not be possible without the later.These two ideas of Human existence are not necessarily compatible.For example, the existence of Legal Freedoms can be felt, while its reality (existence in our acts) and its essence (its conception that we have) poses problems. The first point could be addressed in a Socio-Political research; the second point constitutes its metaphysical base and particularly the Philosophical understanding of Freedom.This article is divided into two parts to facilitate this understanding.The first part covers the Philosophical aspects - treating the metaphysical notions of Freedom and the second part - the Sociological aspects.However one should keep in mind that the two aspects are interrelated. The Freedom is the sense of acting according to one's own will without being restrained by the power of anyone else.It is defined negatively as the absence from submission,servitude,constraint exercised by someone else. positively as: the autonomy and spontaniety of a rational being;the voluntary human behaviours are based on freedom and qualified as Free This notion is seen as an abstract and normative value of the human actions and at the same time like a solid reality.These two perspectives are interwoven in many ways and could lead to errors of categorisation.There are, therefore, numerous confusions that can arise with respect to the term Freedom.So,it is necessary to distinguish the different sense of this word. The Freedom could be taken as an attribute of the Human Being, of his will and be the condition of natural and positive rights, but also his duties;the effective realisation of the voluntary acts has a dimension that could not be possible without the later.These two ideas of Human existence are not necessarily compatible.For example, the existence of Legal Freedoms can be felt, while its reality (existence in our acts) and its essence (its conception that we have) poses problems. The first point could be addressed in a Socio-Political research; the second point constitutes its metaphysical base and particularly the Philosophical understanding of Freedom.This article is divided into two parts to facilitate this understanding.The first part covers the Philosophical aspects - treating the metaphysical notions of Freedom and the second part - the Sociological aspects.However one should keep in mind that the two aspects are interrelated. +"And this is what happens when you don't read books. As for Olga and Gilliard, their stories changed very, very much from the days in Berlin until January 1926. Olga said afterwards that ""she understood no Russian."" Then, in a letter to Mordvinov, she writes:""Curiously, she seems to understand Russian."" She said ""She understood no English"". Then Bella Cohen writes in her article in NY Times that she spoke in English to the invalid, and she answered back in English. Olga said: ""My nieces knew no German"". And we have copy of a post card written by Tatiana already in 1909 showing good knowledge of German. We have schoolbooks from Anastasia showing that she took serious lessons in German. Olga said, I knew I was looking at a stranger. But in Berlin, she said: ""I believe in my heart that she is Anastasia"", something she also repeated to Bella Cohen. She said: ""We showed her photos, and she did not react."" Bella Cohen writes about how AA recognized Shura in a photo where Shura's face was hidden by a bell. Olga ""left Berlin with all hope extinguished."" The very same day she writes her mother's secretary saying: ""How shall I tell Mama, this will kill her."" (""Mama"" would have been devastated by knowing her grandchild was alive, that would mean that the others had perished.) And she tells Frau Rathlef about how she would like to help ""the little one"", but has no money. Gilliard calls her ""La Grande Duchesse"" in front of Dr. Rudnev, and afterwords said that the woman in Berlin had ""nothing in common with the Grand Duchess apart from the color of the eyes."" And that is after his own wife has shown him the congenital bilateral hallux valgus, the scars on the shoulder and the finger. And according to Shura, she had the same hair color ""with the same wave"". Clearly these two were lying, their own writings tell us that. , Olga wrote to the unknown woman after the visit: ""You are no longer alone, and we shall not abandon you."" ""Longing to see you."" ""I remember when we were together."" Would she write this to a total stranger? Would she give her personal photo album to FS? I don't think so. And don't forget that Frau Rathlef sent her manuscript to Olga for verification, and got it back with the words that the description of the time in Berlin was ""quite corret."" ChatNoir " +I have learned your secret pastime +" I think you are talking second part of the story (After the war, relocation period). ""what gave Turks the right to tell Armenians what to do?"" I didnt get you. Armenian and turks were living together in the same land and were being ruled by ottoman empire, so ofcourse Turks had the right to tell Armenians what to do. You mean ottoman empire requested different things from armenians as compared to turks? A facist request? What about raping turkish woman they were also woman there were no difference. These kind of things are happening in all war in history and nobody knows if it is true. You mean that turks were facist and hating armenians and raped them? So article is generally about second half of the story. Relocation of Armenians. " +Where can i find the murder charges, the french twin of this article which i am translating does not have any link to this charge, do you have any WP:RS about this ? newspaper, court case, or something smiler ? +Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - (山本一郎)(会話) +"==Regarding edits made during September 11 2006== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (talk) " +Dr.Macrossan's link which you are censoring contains many highly reputed sources: SirEdmund Wittaker, Keswani in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Professor Winterberg, etc etc are anything but fringe sources, you just don't like whatthey all say. Restore the link which you are censoring. 173.169.90.98 +It is with equally great regret that I must inform you that the source of information on the personal wealth of those other individuals you mention isn't strictly limited solely to a blog, on Forbes.com or otherwise. Many cross-referencing using various reliable sources of data and audits exists for those people. As mentioned earlier, Forbes.com's blog post on Agostinelli isn't sourced with any data whatsoever; therefore, no one is in any position to decipher where they obtained their information. The financial journal (OGFJ) cites the $1 billion fund value in what would appear to be as reliable as one can get given the disclosure came in the context of a major financial transaction which would have implied due diligence. The Forbes.com blog source must therefore be treated accordingly and not taken as gospel or absolute. For all we know, it could be a well-orchestrated public relations bamboozling. It certainly wouldn't be the first time. Until reliable personal hard fiscal data and financials are available on this individual himself, it seems this article is duly balanced, particularly to reflect the various facets of this specific debate. Good day. +". You presume, and you are wrong. I cannot, and have not ""thrown"" away anyone's work. I write, edit, and continue to source" +I WAS POSRIN TTHE TRUTH +The Bleiburg Massacres took place over months ! Direktor has conveniently defended the monster democidal killer Tito and washed his hands of this atrocious crimes. Even the most titoist historians in Croatia such as Slavko Goldstein admits that Tito knew exactly what was going on - there is even the notes of Simo Dubaic, his testimony, the orders he was receiving - was to brutally kill. There were no real trials. There was no mercy. +" Precious again baseball and cathedrals Thank you for quality articles on baseball and cathedrals, such as List of Major League Baseball hitters with two grand slams in one game and Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception, for adding categories, contributions to DYK and the news, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! A year ago, you were the 993rd recipient of my Sky Prize, " +". I feel now shocked that you tell me ""ENOUGH"". I only wanted to explain my doubts" +" Navigation popup problems with Opera I've encountered a number of problems with the navigation popup tool and Opera 8 for Linux: After showing for a few seconds, the popup expands with between one and five pages of mostly Chinese characters. I assume this is supposed to be a page preview. The popup always has a broken image link on the right side. The popup functionality appears to cause serious problems with clicking on ""diff"" and ""cur"" links in article history: the cursor may refuse to change from an arrow to a hand, clicking on a link may do nothing, clicking on a link may take several seconds to several minutes to register. Displaying a page history may cause the broswer to use 100% of available CPU time. " +Holy shit shut the f*** up you motherf*** c***! +How could Muhammad have been the author if he was illiterate? +antandarus where do you live im sick of you blocking me +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to November Rain. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. +Speedy How in the world does this qualify for CSD3? This is a set index article listing the localities in Russia called Adamovka. It's only problem is that it is not yet sourced, which is easily fixable upon request.— • (yo?); September 18, 2012; 17:43 (UTC) +Date fortmats Both Russia and Georgia use International Dating (day month year) format, and I can't see any good reason to use American (month day year) dating format in this article. +Link interesant Amintiri din iad +Please check the technology links at the end of the article independent peer reviewed publications on the company's technolgy +That's next day, so I might as well see Main Page. +I fixed all of them and re-added it. In the most professional way Ive seen. There were two other very Pro ways of wording it. I chose the Best version. looks good reads good provides a deeper perspective while being professional to the Hardcore Punk page. 73.193.195.69 +Andrew Skonick just started an edit war at Maharishi Mahesh Yogi This has to stop. +" Might interest you.. In one of my linguistics courses, we studied the usage of the proper /ing/ ([ŋ]) pronunciation on present participles (ex- running, hopping etc) versus the substandard /In/ pronunciation (runnin', hoppin') among various social classes in the US. It was found that in working class families that the /In/ was much more common, even in formal interviews, with it being less often used when reading a text or passage. In middle class and even lower middle class families, the /ing/ was used much more frequently. I guess the point is, who's right? (you could argue the same with African American vernacular English)- is it wrong or a dialect? Anyway, thought I'd share that tid bit with you. Peace, Tom UDI " +org Many ususual sightings +globe and mail and ynetnews using an identical text btw the same source except a new composed subtitle text or better news summary in ynetnews where obviously legitimate and justified are used for the same Russian word. No progress at all. +yo bro i'd understand that you 24 hour banned me if you could explain why. fuck you you're a fag +which at the moment is only protecting personal interests +" I certainly wouldn't have thought you were making a point, it's just tension is raised at the minute, so as someone semi-involved, I appologise that you've been caught in the cross fire. Religious usernames have been discussed at WT:RFCN and WT:U, everytime with the conclusion that a religious username must be provocative to disallow it, a single name of a god, is also often too generic for it to be considered it's only meaning. " +uhhhh YOU DON'T OWN THIS SITE. SO DON'T TOUCH MY ARTICLES. +I still think you are ignoring my main point which is that this is all a joke, and therefore based on untruths. And that both The Circus is in the peripheral of the joke and the joke is in the peripheral of The Circus. It has had no lasting impact on the news media and almost entirely disappeared after a few days. And again, not every single subject that is reported by the media should be added to Wikipedia. I still don't see any good reason why this needs to be kept. +from Sutton's office +How long have I been blocked for? I had something funny to say to that John Reaves fucknut. Oh, and ... +GANGS Thank you for intervening smartse, I am following the advise of CobaltblueTony and pursuing this overheated - (nightshift36) using the correct complaint procedures once I figure it out. +Hot hot hot skype show see my userpage +" I think we should hold hands and sing: ""kum by yaah"" errm... yeah... ""Kum by yaah my lord, kum by yah"" happy now? " +" January 2011 Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:List of Twin Cuz Episodes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 1994 " +Nor did I call Abagnale a tinfoil hat type. All of this is beside the point. 21:20, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) +I've been waiting next to my computer day and night constantly refreshing my watchlist looking for an orange bar to indicate you were back! Kidding aside, that sounds good. I've been busy with Tropic Thunder and now watching the Samuel L. Jackson page after vandals believe he is the next to pass away after Bernie Mac and Issac Hayes recently did. +" No, you're not. At least that's my interpretation as well: ""Manchester United"" plural, ""the club"", or ""the team"" singular. Fatuorum " +Get a encyclopedia you nerds......(kanichiwa bitches) +can you be a little more specific. please provide sources regarding opposition to 18th amendment. feel free to add the 'crucial points' which are not specified. +"::Uh...what the heck are you talking about, Crohnie? I never said anything here about the person you are claiming I was talking about. As far as what's been proven at SPI...so far, the jury is still out and from what I can see, there's been no final decision made. You can claim you've tried ""really hard to assume good faith and work with [me] politely"", but the proof is in the pudding, dear. If I were talking about you simply disagreeing with me, I would have said so - I don't have a problem confusing simple disagreement with a complete lack of respect and good faith. What's more, I will not ""refactor"" anything, because it's unneccessary. But now that you mention it, remember the baseless accusations you made about me last week regarding Chowbok's sandbox? Remember how you claimed I was actually the one who encouraged him to start the page? I requested then that you retract what you said because it was a false, unfounded accusation and you ignored me. You ignorning the fact that you accused me wrongly was ""rude, assumes bad faith and just isn't called for"". " +All the books written about the Cypriot community in the UK are political from the point of view of one community or the other so you can't understand them. Don't go thinking that if they were written by foreigners then the might be neutral. The books written by foreigners are the worst of all. +Aye, they are both sourced. ( ) +" What do you mean ""... as many as 79 verses..."" can't you count you lazy git? " +I imagined it was something like that. No harm done. +Please add to this page Concert Hall Hamalir. +No accident. And implying that I'm a child could be considered by some to be harassment. Just a thought +While the date could be an honest mistake, the error regarding the award was harder to overlook. With IPs I generally err on the side of suspicion given overwhelming precedent. +You have a point here, there are numerous references in the article that direct you to some conservapedia article, but still, past mistakes do not justify the continued violation of WP:NOR. +I am thinking of a darker theme. Does anyone object? +" People from South Orange, New Jersey Hello, the list that you created at Category:People from South Orange, New Jersey was moved to List of people from South Orange, New Jersey. ☎ " +WP:WIKIHOUNDING Please cease and desist from hounding me. For you to lecture me on bad behavior and then to act in the same manner is hardly the sign of a responsible editor. I urge you to calm down and to pull back from the brink, or it will be you that gets a block not I. +" Newly created/added cat is POV/OR Adding new cat Category:LGBT rights opposition is not appropriate here for reasons stated on the cat's Talk page section entitled, ""Cat violates Wiki policy?"" Further, as illustrated on Concerned Women for America, the cat may be controversial, and cats are not used for controversial material. The existence of controversy evidences the cat is inappropriate for the page. In particular, WP:CAT says: Particular considerations for categorizing articles: It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. Use the template if you find an article in a category that is not shown by sources to be appropriate, or the template if the article gives no clear indication for inclusion in a category. Obviously, it is not ""clear from verifiable information in the article"" if the wiki community keeps removing it. I urge and support removal of the cat, else I urge the addition of either or both cat templates shown above from WP:CAT. I am repeating this on all pages in which this new cat was added so communities there can discuss. " +" Propol, I will make it simple so a young guy like your self understands... any additions to the James Philips bio which don't meet standards of Encyclopedic content I will remove. I will not play the games, bandy words, or question the motives of other editors or any accusations of them being ""Bias"". No. I will just just simply remove, with out explanation, what don't meet standards of Encyclopedic content, since my reasons for my actions are censored. Also, I will fully expect any content, which contain fanciful speculation, unproven allegations and other nonsense, I expect the Admin to remove and enforce, per your wiki policy, so standard is meet on the James Philip bio. IF you don't I will. In closing, YOUR LEADER - JIMMY, had said this... I QUOTE... Real people are involved, and they can be hurt by your words. We are not tabloid journalism, we are an encyclopedia. –Jimmy Wales Again quoting JIMMY ""... reverting someone who is trying to remove libel about themselves is a horribly stupid thing to do.""–Jimmy Wales Don't be stupid. " +" Perhaps you shopuld consider the possibility that your confrontational response to my edits coloured my response to you? Your violent outbursts to other editors seem to have the same effect. My previous comments stand. (Μελ Ετητης) Yes and perhaps you should apologise for your inconsiderate editing of pages that I've put a lot of work into? Your edit changed what I thought was a good format. Yes I know about overlinking, but whether something is truely overlinked or not is reasonably subjective. You didn't leave any kind of decent explanation for me until after we'd both reverted each other's edits a number of times. My edit had 3 links in close proximity. I had left them in the infobox for consistency of style, i.e. dates in black, teams in blue. There was nothing overly offensive about it. The article itself had no such overlinking. Your edit had a careless typo and some information removed. I saw it as careless, unnecessary and rude, and so I reverted you. You reverted me without correcting your mistakes, and so I simply reverted you again as you were being continually rude. I may have come across as confrontational, but your continual ""No, I am correct"" revisions came across to me as confrontational. You started this. You are still being rude with your refusal to take any blame. As I read through your talk pages I see a lot of this arrogant ""I know best"" behaviour. Sure you contribute a lot, and probably do know the correct style better than the average contributor, but can you not accept that your behaviour in this case was far from ideal? I can accept that mine was, but as I have pointed out a number of times already you started this and I felt the need to defend my position. " +]] Archive 3 Archive 4 [[/Archive 5/|Archive 5 +Talk main page Hi, I'm not sure how long you've been hanging about talk main page, I seem to remember your sig. But do you remember Template:Main Page discussion header ? We used to have that on there, but people still placed help questions and etc on talk:main page. The general consensus recently was to just not have any warnings or help and just answer people's questions or direct them to where they should be, with out WP:BITEing them. No use in trying to hold back the tide it seems. People 'never' read instructions ;) +" Miller and the Waugh's have early life article so I think it's fine. Pruning/expanding will continue over the next few months. '''' (talk'') Review me! " +Deleted Message You seem to have deleted my message to Tuf-Kat on his/her discussion page. There was no image involved with this message. What's going on with that? +Adminship So may I ask, if I could: you would still feel comfortable with a nomination, or have actions in the meantime caused you to question whether you would support me as a candidate? I will not feel at all hurt if you say the latter - I would prefer that than to drag you into an RFA that you don't wish to push. +You keep erasing information that's none of your business...You QUACK How did you deny all the sources in the movie proving HIV is a fraud? You are part of the problem on Wikipedia. You power tripping pussy. https://sites.google.com/site/davebrodbeckcaughtonwikipedia/ You're next VQuakr. +It's noteworthy but I don't think it merits its own article. But it has made national news, covered by CBS and NBC among several newspapers. Moving it a list of Internet memes is probably the thing to do. +" Dude, your heart's in the right place, but your brain may be in neutral. You don't need to ""neutralize"" a ""compliant"" enemy combatant. That's why they're called ""compliant"". Taking prisoners (alive) is a big part of what SEALs do (if you can believe the books I've read)." +The criticism from Clive James is not a critique of Ashbery so much as it is about the poetry establishment or poetry industry. James is saying that it converts promising poets like Ashbery into product factories, and that the product is deemed by the establishment to be amenable to further reshaping by the industry to suit its purposes. That's what James says, but what he is getting at, is praise for Ashbery, rather than the negative that was suggested above by Sighrik: that Ashbery could have produced more great stuff if he had not been so converted by the industry. I would say that this is an important piece of criticism on Ashbery, to the extent that those who consider themselves to be working outside the industry (oddly, this includes many university professors) have come to view Ashbery as something less than the real thing, or that he became part of the established industry because he was not a true innovator. James's suggestion is that the conventional university attitude toward Ashbery is not fair or accurate. Even though it is a bit roundabout, I would put the James critique back in the article. +" Questions: ""National amphibian"" (National frog???) ""National reptile"" ""National river"" ""National mountain"" ""National marine mammal"" ""Natioinal vegetable"" ""National document"" ""National Song (Patriotic)"" Some of these sound like an obvious hoax, often quite ridiculously so. So, I'd request citations for them. Please. Thanks. Certianly some of the entires are hoax.e.g. the entry national fruit states amb(mango). Although mango may rightly be the national fruit, ""amb"" is not even an Urdu word for mango. The word come from Punjabi and definitely it was never declared by Pakistani government that ""amb"" is the natioanl fruit. I am removing this entry for the least. Similarly ""national reptile"" is translated as ""Qaumi MagarMach"", which stands for ""national crocodile"" in Urdu. Indus is called ""Sindh"" in Urdu, not ""Sindhu"" which is much more of a local language name/nickname. National marine mammal is translated as ""Qaumi machlee"" which infact stands for ""national fish"". Indeed these are ridiculous. Deletion This page is candidate for quick deletion. on October 2, 2006|recently}}. The result of the discussion was keep." +facist muslim fuck face is what u r. bitch. fuck off and die. +Honestly, I don't think it does. +Okay, okay. You all can help teach me about formatting. Thanks. +" Btw, the German article has ""helicos"", and French ""helix"", but without sources. I'll keep checking the other interwikis in the latin alphabet, and see if one has some different sources we can check. - " +" What do you mean ""Until you provide the lists"". Articles don't use the succession boxes anymore. • Watch n' Learn " +" Oppose merging ""Notable"" nonetheless and ""notability"" is permanant, etc.. " +No it is not, I did not use a slur, I stated that he may have a conflict of interest. I didn't know how else to put it. Drmies called me an idiot, thats a clear personal attack. And you have a Pro-Israel decal on your page, which means you have a conflict of interest. I want to take this up with ARB-COM, there should NOT be a double standard for admins breaking the rules, OR a double standard for Pro-Israel/Jewish wiki matters. This is not a place for Zionism. +Hazel Eye Myth== The description of hazel eyes says they're green and brown (either colour could be dominant) and can also contain gold, this description is incorrect, true hazel eyes are a golden honey brown colour (basically light brown) which matches the colour of a golden brown hazelnut shell (hence the word hazel), however in some instances can contain minimal amounts of green (either on the outskirts and/or mixed in with the gold) when observed in direct/sun light, but green is by no means a requirement for true hazel eyes. The myth of hazel eyes being green and brown or any multi-coloured eye is common in North America aswell as areas of the world that have been exposed to Americanisation, However in Europe (the origin of light eyes & hazelnuts) the correct meaning still exists and is used when identifying eye color (hazel eyes = golden light brown colour). The myth of hazel eyes being green and brown or any multi-coloured eye is likely to of started due to green and brown eyes turning a gold and/or light brown colour in areas of dim lighting and actual hazel eyes sometimes presenting slight green when observed in direct/sun light, but this is nonetheless an obvious misconception which requires common sense to understand. As for green and brown eyes they're well green eyes that contain contain central heterochromia (brown around the pupil) but this does not change the fact of their true colour being the outer green, if you want to categorise them differently the name Forest Green proves worthy or just simply green eyes with brown. Here are some examples of what true hazel eyes are; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hazel_eye_of_a_mixed-ethnicity_female.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amber_Brown_Green.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:S7307583.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HumanFemalewithAmberIris.jpg http://toponthelist.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/amber_eye.jpg http://www.flickr.com/photos/mocuishle_photography/2340845990/sizes/l/in/photostream Here are some sources backing up my statement; http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hazel (defines it as a light golden brown colour, after a hazelnut) http://www.wonderquest.com/eye-color-age.htm (states hazel eyes are light brown or yellowish brown) http://www.fanteye.com/extimages/p_FreshlooksColorblendsChartLG.jpg (shows a pure hazel eye, big difference to the green eye diagonally below to the right) http://www.colormecontacts.com/colored-contacts-for-dark-eyes (puts hazel eyes in the same category as honey, not green plus displays a green eye with abit of brown (central heterochromia) under the green category) http://www.yestheyrefake.net/color_contacts_buy_photos.htm (shows hazel eyes in numerous pictures presenting them as a golden brown) http://hazeleyes-wintergoddess.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/hazel-eyes.html (states the North American misconception and the true/original European definition while showing examples of various sources, numerous pictures and comments below of people agreeing and showing gratitude) http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_definition_of_Hazel_eyes (states the misconception and says that hazel eyes are supposed to match the hazel or cob nut, the fruit of the hazel bush/tree that grows in Europe) http://m.rateitall.com/iPhone/item.aspx?p=0&ItemID;=1074601 (shows an optometrists opinion/experience with the issue while stating the North American hazel eye misconception and providing sources backing up his statement) Hazel Eye Picture On The Right The picture on the right hand side of the hazel eye section does not match the description of hazel eyes, as it is blue with central heterochromia (brown around the pupil). The hazel eye description says nothing about hazel eyes being blue in any way, so i trust this is a mistake that needs to be changed immediately, i propose one of the following pictures be shown in it's place as they match a golden light brown hazelnut colour: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hazel_eye_of_a_mixed-ethnicity_female.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amber_Brown_Green.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HumanFemalewithAmberIris.jpg == +MfD nomination of Draft:Alan Trustman Draft:Alan Trustman, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alan Trustman (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Alan Trustman during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. +Deleting discussion items you have been previously warned about deleting other people's discussion items and I would appreciate it if that discontinued. It is a form of personal attack and only detracts from the general atmospher and reputation of wikipedia. +Thank you for recognizing me! +" Hello The image that you uploader needs your visit File:ArianaGrandeDecember2013.jpg. in the image says: ""This file may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an image, hosted on Commons, but with tags or information on its English Wikipedia description page that are no longer needed. See #F2."" Can you fix it please?. Grande's article needs actual images as a File:ArianaGrandeDecember2013.jpg. Regards." +Great, thank you! That helps to clarify. I am his assistant, actually. Here are two cites that show he is a NYT Best Seller: http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2014-11-30/overview.html and http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-06-17/combined-print-and-e-book-nonfiction/list.html 173.213.212.233 Daryn +" Clueless. Do you not have any sensitivity about this at all. More evidence? For god sake. Ceoil " +Wikipedia is biaed and run by God-hating perverts Why have Fred Phelps' websites been taken off? All the most sickening and depraved porn articles have links, etc. Someone put them back under children/parents. Thanks! This site is completely biased, and the founder is a demon-worshipping objectivist. Stop deleting my comments, too, you hypocritical blind fascists. You hatemongers. Put the websites back. +"Copyedit == Your name is listed at WP:PRV, but seeing how you are the new FL director, you probably don't have time to copyedit articles, such as No Way Out (2004). If you can't, do you know of any other good copyeditors, because some at PRV aren't as active anymore.R == " +" Hadith I think there should be hadith from Bukhari and Muslim and other books regarding Dajjal, rather than fancy stories from other people. Talk " +":Hello Jivesh. You seem to be quite busy around the encyclopedia these days. Who is this ""fiend"" of yours? Unfortunately, I will not be able to copyedit the Halo article; first, because I have too many WP commitments all pressing for attention at the moment, secondly, because I am not very competent at these ""song"" articles being, by your standards, quite old (not perhaps as old as Malleus or the great Tim riley, but still relatively aged – I can remember Elvis being alive). There are better editors than me for putting song article to rights; have you contacted " +Dont delete talk page entries fucking asshole. You dont have to make yourself obvious as a criminial on the loose. Are not you supposed to be pimping your mother in L.A. downtown at this time of the night normally? You just preach to your pimping ass. +Killer whale attacks on humans Re this revert, see here. (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) +Electronic trading Paragraph looks like advertising the software development company. +The quote is definitely inflammatory, though definitely in style for Rabbi Shach, who was not known for mincing words. In the spirit of BLP, I suggest our mediator remove it ASAP pending a bulletproof source. - talk/email +" The problem is the wider we cast the net in terms of subject matter for the article, the more room there is for disagreement and debate. Energies are dispersed, and the article becomes lopsided and uneven. Read the article on Human skin color. This article discusses the various theories about human skin color. One scenario is that fair skin is the result of spontaneous, random mutation, that, theoretically, there were white-skinned people (the result of genetic mutations) in Africa, but they simply did not survive to produce progeny; that the same mutations occurred when humans migrated north, but because of the climate, those mutants survived to bear and rear offspring. Another scenario posits that humans initially were pale like simians, but as they began to lose their hair, their skin darkened over time as a climatic accommodation. And there are other theories, as well. You want to get into melanin in this article and the accompanying sturm und drang of agrument, disagreement and, potentially, more edit warring (just look at what's happened here with a far narrower piece) and for material that eventually will be cut out, anyway? The ""mechanics of melanin""? This still reads like a phenomenally bad idea. " +Not the same person== Stop changing it to your opinions. Claude Speed and Claude are not the same thing. I'm editing it. Stupid pimple faced kids. +" , I have fixed them now. The ""??"" did not make any sense and made them totally gibberish. However it takes a native speaker to fix something of this sort. However your support is much appreciated. Cheers! " +preferring to falsify the truth by +" Condemn all you want, the article was deleted because the subject is not notable, as they fail WP:GNG. Do not recreate until they have received significant independent coverage in reliable sources. message me! " +" DYK On 5 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Bodys Isek Kingelez, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " +See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet. I dont think the info is misleading in the sense that Clarkson said you can buy a gun and bullets and yet not a drink in the US without a passport and it is our job to record what he said not to comment on the truth or otherwise of his comments. I neither know nor care whether he said is true or not and I dont believe we are evn allowed to say whether his comments are true or not as that would count as original research. The comment seemed fine the other day when i passed my editing hand over the article. There are some political leftie types who edit this article but I am not one of them, +ur name why is ur name hersfold if ur a guy are u trying to tell the world something. Also ur picture is ridiculous no one cares about wikipedia its a useless thing. u need to leave grandmas house once in awhile an see the world for what it is +" | Ricky ""The Dragon"" Steamboat || || 87 || Legends |- | Rob Van Dam || || 90 || Legends |- | Santino Marella || || 79 || Raw |- | Shad Gaspard || || 79 || SmackDown |- | Shawn Michaels || || 94 || Legends |- | Sheamus || || 90 || Raw |- | Shelton Benjamin || || 86 || SmackDown |- | ""Stone Cold"" Steve Austin || || 94 || Legends |- | Ted DiBiase Jr. || || 83 || Raw |- | Terry Funk || || 86 || Legends |- | The Miz || || 88 || Raw |- | The Rock || || 93 || Legends |- | The Undertaker || || 95 || SmackDown |- | Triple H || || 95 || Raw |- | Tyson Kidd || || 81 || Raw |- | Vance Archer || || 78 || SmackDown |- | Vladimir Kozlov || || 82 || Raw |- | Wade Barrett || || 86 || DLC |- | William Regal || || 85 || Raw |- | Yoshi Tatsu || || 79 || Raw |- | Zack Ryder || || 80 || Raw" +Ethnicity or sexuality should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability - but we have a habit of including personal preferences as well. Just throwing it out there. +" Need a help Hi everyone, I would love if anyone can write a brief summary - in 1 or 2 sentence - regarding the historical background of Baburam Bhattarai that can be put up on his wikipedia page. We need to write based on these articles: - http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-19519379_ITM - http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2010/01/01/top-stories/Parties-vow-to-end-trust-deficit/3609/ - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3246066.stm My brief summary is: ""In 2003, Baburam Bhattarai along with 14 other persons had Interpol red corner notices issued against them for crimes such as murder and terrorism."" Do you all think this summary provides the accurate information as per above sourced articles?" +Doesn't matter; you should be able to make a edit now to remove it, then another edit when it expires to put it back, can't you? (talk | ) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles Durward Griffin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Say Headcheese!-Chord2 " +your conclusion (that Ryu isthe next Akuma or whatever) +":Your article has been redirected to the right place. You seem to be new to WIkipedia. You might want to read to help you to find your way. On talk pages please sign your posts with ~~~~ whcih turns automagically into your signature ) Faddle " +" Okay, understood.    " +- I have no idea why this wasn't in place already. Nice catch! talk - contribs +And that's my summary of Harry Potter. +Newest Vital Sign The article Newest Vital Sign has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +", 24 June 2008 (UTC) Oort cloud-TFA? I was wondering if you could help me find a date to nominate oort cloud for TFA. Thanks, (talk) 00:22" +No problem. There is actually a bot that archives things automatically after several days. +" Copy of Article Hey David, can you supply me with a copy of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutritional Gatekeeper piece to my subpage. I’ll work on it in the next few weeks. Thanks. Talk " +Oh, by the way: . Ciao, +What really happened at Augusta High School after Chris Woods death? What the f*ck is that! Sh*t! I'm dying in this country @$$ f*cked up town! Bugs flying in my mouth, I can't see, pollen, let's get the f*ck out of this country @$$ f*cked up sh*t! +(Or should I follow your example and delete things I don't like from other people's talk pages ?) +It's so nice to see the cockroaches come together. =//= +I'm going to punt your cat about, then it will die. Then you can invent a cyber-cat you geek. However, I will proceed to punt that. +"Closing as ""yes it should"". The discussion is basically between ""I don't like it"" on the con side, and ""It helps and it's in line with common practise"" on the pro. We don't accept the cons' argument when contrasted with the argument that the pros are making. Because the issue of infobox vs. identibox was brought up so late and not discussed by most people, I'm going to say ""no consensus"" on that. I would encourage participants to open a new discussion on it immediately; it wouldn't be much help to keep open that part of the discussion, because people are obviously discussing it in the context of ""should we have anything of the sort""" +REDIRECT Talk:Princess Beatriz, Duchess of Savoy +REDIRECT Talk:Game design document +Thank you! Please ping me or write on my talkpage to let me know. +Remove this article entirely ++1 vote for deletion +Possibly unfree Image:Juan Gualberto Gomez airport.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Juan Gualberto Gomez airport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +roadster i believe the roadster is a character from the kirby's air ride, not a new character 76.5.219.236 +This person is criminal +Getting past the Twinkle problem (I don't use Twinkle myself, so I can't help there), and going to the merits of the article, I would note that WP:LISTED, particularly the second paragraph of the section, tends to suggest that nominating the article for deletion may not be the best plan for dealing with it. (talk) +Sockpuppet I sucked my dickYOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.248.73.184 +Love to, but as a student in college I'm very busy right now. I've tried to stay away from that article for that very reason, but I'll try to come over sometime this weekend. +No worries. A couple people seemed to make that mistake so I tried to clarify. It's sometimes tricky to do article work outside of article space, but when things get deleted all the time without due process and consideration it's sometimes all I can muster to work things up where I can. ) Take care. +Hm, you seem intent upon characterizing our motivations and actions in the worst possible light. I wasn't trying to wear anyone down. I was improving the article as the discussion progressed and wanted to call attention to that fact; also, a lot of the editors' votes seemed to be based upon the AfD, which was no longer accurate as of the day after it was written. However, I did not expect you to revise your call, and was mostly doing this in the spirit of trying to settle the issue without deletion review, as WP:DRV suggests. You appear to be hostile to our very existence, so that, as they say, is that. +"::As I pointed out, it is a misrepresentation of Warshak, because you have combined two sentences together, the critical one of which states that only ""Most mental health and legal professionals"" agree, not that it is ""not a point of contention"". (And neither of them mention the ""chronically or irrationally"" part. That's ignoring the issue of the out-of-date nature of the comment and source. I take it you agree that you have mispresented Bernet. As I have said, over and over again, nobody disputes that some children may be alienated from their parents. What is thoroughly in dispute (and almost totally discarded at this point) in the field is Gardner's conception of PAS, including existence, causality, treatment etc.. This is an article about PAS, and all of these aspects are already included included in the article. The influence of parents clearly is a point of contention as one of your own sources makes clear, and why all the newer conceptions (parental alienation, parental alienation disorder, etc) do not include the parent's actions as a criteria for the disorder. But I'm repeating myself and will do so again. Your paragraph is not an accurate representation of either the sources you have provided, or of the literature in general. " +If there is a strong consensus to change the dates in the body and non-automatically-formatted dates (ones not formatted in template style), perhaps it can develop in dicussion while waiting to see what happens in the MOS (in the meantime). If I'm not understanding what you are referring to, please explain further and link to what you want us to read re: MOS changes or potential changes. Thanks. +", 1 December 2009 (UTC)|decline=Your contributions immediately leading up to this block show a point-making campaign of the worst kind, and I see no reason to lift your block early given that there have been no assurances that you intend to stop this sort of behavior. Regarding warnings, you've been an editor at Wikipedia for 2 years, you can't expect us to believe that you thought being disruptive in this manner would be allowable? 32 04:12" +Just chat up commie Now listen here. There is no reason for you or any body elce to remove my suggestion for deletion of the article about Fight Dem Back. +Additions of http://.MusaliaMudavadi.com Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices ' +Fixed that one too. link +sufficient? No matter he has been banned, +POO IT'S FEWEST YOU IDIOT +" If Either way chooses to disregard my request, I will simply delete his post. Just because you have seen some admins make uncivil comments does not mean that you should make uncivil comments, either. I don't dispute that. My problem with this is that mods who are civility warriors stand by while their brethren make uncivil comments. As stated above, this injustice is ridiculous, atrocious, and despicable. Why aren't mods subject to the same rules that govern the ""commoners""? I've already called people out for the inequality at Simple. " +" Writers and Editors add value to Wikipedia and what do they receive in return other than egoboo? Writers and editors should not work for free. At best, there needs to be in-kind donation documentation with fair market value for writing and editing services. Facts are stubborn.Comments? " +My reasonings for 1801, as opposed to 1707. The Kingdom of Great Britain & Ireland were each single entities when then merged. The Anglo-Irish Treaty is inclusive as it created the current status of the UK. The Norman invasion is best left 'only' in the England article. Why do I see it this way? If we go back far enough, the UK would be divided into many kingdoms - Strathclyde, Essex, Sussex, etc etc. +I seem like an experienced wiki contributor because I am an experienced wiki contributor. I am a volunteer administrator at LyricWiki.org (see http://lyricwiki.org/User:Kiefer), one of the largest non-Wikipedia wikis. If you look at my contributions here, you'll notice that my first edit is December 26, 2007, and that most of my edits concern vandalism or music-related errors on pages that I have referenced for LyricWiki. Begging your pardon, but you really can't believe that I'm somehow trying to purposely derail you. I mean, seriously...trained and paid? Who would possibly train me and pay me? Fake user accounts? All but have lengthy histories. (And all that user did was strike out one section - didn't even remove it.) So, which do you think are fake accounts? And how is what I'm telling you any different than what Cretog8 is telling you? I have been civil, courteous, and have done nothing more horrible than try to be helpful to a new editor who I thought wanted to improve this article but didn't know where to begin. Your comments, however, show a strong streak of paranoia, despite my repeated assurances to you that these changes have nothing to do with you or the subject. (I'm still really not sure why you would even think anyone would be against you or the theory....) I think that you're upset because I called you on your non-neutral point of view. For me, it's fine that you don't have a NPOV. It's just that your writing must not reflect that NPOV. That's not me saying that, that's the Wikipedia policy. +" Group 2 moves The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Proposal by move articles named ""XX Strategic Offensive"" > ""XX Offensive"" Sandomierz–Silesian Offensive Operation -> Sandomierz–Silesian Offensive Belostock Offensive Operation -> Belostock Offensive Bobruysk Offensive Operation -> Bobruysk Offensive Kaunas Offensive Operation -> Kaunas Offensive Lower Silesian Offensive Operation -> Lower Silesian Offensive Lublin–Brest Offensive Operation -> Lublin–Brest Offensive Minsk Offensive Operation -> Minsk Offensive Mogilev Offensive Operation -> Mogilev Offensive Nagykanizsa-Kermend Offensive Operation -> Nagykanizsa-Kermend Offensive Osovets Offensive Operation -> Osovets Offensive Ostrogozhsk-Rossosh Operation -> Ostrogozhsk-Rossosh Offensive Polotsk Offensive Operation -> Polotsk Offensive Shyaulyay Offensive Operation -> Shyaulyay Offensive Tallinn Offensive Operation -> Tallinn Offensive Toropets-Kholm Operation -> Toropets–Kholm Offensive Upper Silesian Offensive Operation -> Upper Silesian Offensive Vilnius Offensive Operation -> Vilnius Offensive Vitebsk–Orsha Offensive Operation -> Vitebsk–Orsha Offensive Zemland offensive operation -> Zemland Offensive Comment: Uncontroversial; no objection. The new names conform fully with naming policy.  talk The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion." +" There is a ""fork""/further discussion of this requested move at wt:civility#Why is the american u.s. tv series the BiG BANG THEORY theory allowed to be more notable than what is real, really, The Big Bang Theory. To me, it would be less confusing if the two DABpages were merged. ( talk) " +" LAHS Article Hi. You once assessed the Los Alamos High School article. I do a lot of maintenance on that article. It's been under disrepair so I could understand why you might have called it ""start"" rather than ""B"" (although I encourage you to check out the latest revision), but I really don't get why Albuquerque Academy is rated with ""Mid"" importance while Los Alamos is ""Low"". What's the justification behind this distinction? Both are good high schools in the southwest. IMO Los Alamos's history is more interesting than academy. " +" Notability Until the notability is obvious per WP:GNG / WP:MUSIC , I think removing the notability without justifying (at least) isn't so helpful. ; talk " +" Speedy deletion of ""Josh lizer"" A page you created, Josh lizer, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. " +" Category:Wikipedians who listen to video game music on WP:UCFD again This category is again nominated for discussion at user categories for discussion. Since you contributed to the last discussion, you may wish to say something in the current one, which was started on 8 July 2007. This is a courtesy notice I'll be leaving for everyone who contributed in the last UCFD nomination and not in the current one. (T) " +" Interestingly, Ray Franz writes (pg 385-386) about several letters he sent to his uncle after being disfellowshipped. He says he expected no reply and received none. He includes an extract from a letter he sent to him in 1988 as Fred Franz neared death. He says he was not surprised he received no reply, but was sad, nonetheless. I'm intrigued, Fazil, about your comment, ""Later on his vitriolic sentiments/bias in his book suggests his dis-fellow-shipping was justified again and proves he is dishonest."" Ray Franz was certainly critical of the WTS in his book, although ""vitriol"" seems too harsh a word. The overall tone of the book is concern and sadness, but if you have read the book you are free to make your own judgment. But what dishonesty are you referring to, and what is it in his book that ""proves"" he was dishonest? Willietell makes a claim based on local gossip that Franz lied about why he disassociated — though all the evidence points to Franz being right and Willietell being wrong — but I know of no other allegations that Franz was dishonest. Throughout his time in, and then out, of the organization, he was revered as a man of strong principle .... which, of course was the reason he decided he could no longer remain on the Governing Body or in the religion. " +Poem There once was a terrible admin whose operating system was multitasking so he banned in parallel the editors of body odour smell and then came the end of this poem 81.158.98.214 Anonymous Fan +Please do not remove warnigns from other users talk page. +joshbuddy, it is your opinion that I do not know how to work with others. I appreciate this is your feeling, and I am glad you felt free to share it with me. What is amazing in this exchange is that you view critical and studied analysis as hostility. I have not offered any insults. I have offered objective feedback, and explanations when asked for. When you write that I “completely missed” the existence of the HLC and HIS your statement is purely absurd! I am the one that added that language in the introduction in the first place! Frankly, EVERY SINGLE item you complain I omitted is in fact FOUND in the verified version! How on earth you can claim to have a meaningful analysis comparing the verified Lead-in language with the body of the article is beside me to understand. I recommend continued education as a remedy. +Responded to the Administrator's talk page on 3 Dec. explaining that this was not an edit war but part of an ongoing dialogue - which was corroborated the next day by the reverted editor. +Sorry I logged off last nite.. Yeah tings going on a full circle, I have had an offer of a disk of Ubuntu whcih is inspired by Ubuntu. Dunno if I should make the leap and use that. Apart from that I ha been exploring religion that mix Catholicism and Africa and end up wid Yoruba - U into this kindof thing no? P - +" File:Text-screenshot1.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Text-screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. (talk) " +" Well thank you for at least stepping up and citing some kind of reasoning for what I consider unreasonable actions on the part of others Bob Rayner! No original research? Are you kidding me? Years of research was reported (both failures and successes), that was also physically verified experimentally by over 20 others world-wide, and is cited on my original, and now archived (and now unalterable by me) open.org/davidc website, on both archive.go-here.com and archive.org in Europe. The past updates on that archive collection details those years of experimental research, including the works of others on the subject around the world, beginning with the first physical verifications by James Hurl of Australia, and follows the story through to the last update before I gave up for a while out of exasperation, due to unrelenting stupidity and prejudice (don't confuse our religiously scientific dogma by citing facts). The theory of operation I believe is clearly stated, and the ""flat earth"" prejudice against the subject is apparent in the overall tone and presentation of the balance of the definition of ""Inertial_Propulsion"". A lone dissenting voice challenging the current dogma is how ALL of science progresses past the ignorance of yesteryears. To disallow original research is to attempt to hold ALL of science to a stable state, and ignores the dynamic nature of the search for greater truths than we currently understand. Science is NOT a BIBLE, and DOGMA is anathema to the entire process of research! " +Leave Me Alone You are constantly leaving me messages. Oh and one more thing, thanks for getting my Page taken off. Fag +KYLEE NEWMAN FROM GRAFTON AND CURRENTLY LIVES IN ANNERLY IS THE FAMOUS WELL KNOWN TOWN BIKE IN BOTH TOWNS INITIALLY STARTED WORKING IN KINGS CROSS AND NOW IS TOURING THE WHOLE FUKN AUSTRALIA +Now that South Korea is temporary out of the question, I would just like to do others a favor by reinstating the rightful places of Hong Kong and Japan, along with Norway, and the ones you have mentioned before. But for now, we both have to put aside Mexico and South Korea, since this is damaging our Wikipedia relationship (. Seong0980 +Stop attaching Vegabob to my Username to further your agenda. +Fatty You are the most disgusting fat, worthless piece of crap to ever grace wikipedia. Losers who still live with their parents, work in walmart and pretend to be an anarchist are worthless swine with nothing relevent to add to an encyclopedia. Please leave this place, you pathetic drag on humanity. You make me sick, you pathetic cretin. I hope you feel nothing but unhappiness for the end of your days, fool. I hope you suffer in your inequity, weighed down by your massive manbreasts, making women point at you and laugh in the street and making men thank god they aren't as ugly as you. You look like a paedophile, and probably are, children in the street run into their houses when they see your approach: A truly vile beast of a man, with no intellect, no integrity, no idea of how pathetic he is, you maintain a website and believe this is virtuous - what a waste of human thought you truly are. A curse on humanity is what you are, and the sooner wikipedia is without you the better for all. I beseech you, please leave this place and never come back - turn your back on civilised society and take to the wild - maybe there you shall find some solace. Even in the very wilds of the planet there are animals who will appreciate you for what you are, if you are capable of a modicum of kindness. Please consider this, for you are a drag on humanity. +" hahahaha ""It is said some listeners spontaneously combusted while listening to Laffy Taffy"" I think we are gonna need the citations for that. hahahaha FYI I wasn't the person who typed that fixed ok, lets get something straight. wikipedia is a FACTUAL encyclopedia, not a opinionated one. unless you can show us that it is considered to be the worst hip-hop album made, and that some spontaneously combusted while listening to Laffy Taffy (which is extremely unlikely), then you have all rights to say so. dont come and bitch on wikipedia. do that shit over at urbandictionary. btw, i hate the fucking album." +" Hello - I have no intention whatsoever of making Wikipedia into The Daily Express, however it is beyond peradventure that Corbyn was being disingenuous in his interview with the BBC; the article was better phrased when I first mentioned it, but it has been changed so many times since as ""perhaps"" to lose context, for which I can only apologise. However, please be advised that he is a Privy Councillor and that his interview with the BBC was evasive to say the least. M PS. is Wiki worth fighting for when HM Government website unequivocally cites something & it is refuted?" +Karl John So this is how it works right? On the website anyone can edit? Lugnuts just deletes people's hardwork with a made up reason. I mean I was adding content. Wasn't I? Where is the WP:BOLD or the WP:GF. It is me who should be getting an apology because I actually added material to make the article better. And please don't say it is not verifiable because it is from the German article. The Germans seem quite happy with their version so I was just adding the English. So please apologise on behalf of Lugnuts who never deletes only removes. +Blanking Block Notice -TAB Please note that per WP:BLANKING, you are not permitted to remove a Block notice that is currently in effect. You are welcome to remove the notice once the block has expired. Thank you for your understanding. Please note that if you continue to remove the notice while it is active you may lose the ability to edit your Talk page. Thank you for your understanding. About the Block If you ever block me ever again, then I WILL NOT HAVE IT! *Bangs a Table*. ( ) +You are wrong. Neither of the sources in vague. They are both very precise indeed, and since these facts were made public, neither Nick Clegg nor his party has succeeded in bringing any defence or counter-evidence. They are admitting the accusations are true. +" Here are a few key questions: Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory? Do you understand conflict of interest? Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable? You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. (talk→  ←track) " +This is a Very Damaged Article The Wikipedia contributor, Drmies is extraordinarily destructive with her/his contributions (deletions only) to this article - particularly with originally well-referenced entries about information (these are not my edits) that I was taught by the anthropologist, John Shea, in his Introduction to Archaeology course at Stony Brook University. In keeping with the traditions of illiterate contributions that abound on Wikipedia by semi-knowledgeable contributors (primarily driven by their emotions) that take precedence over more knowledgeable contributions, this article is essentially destroyed by one of Wikipedia's more frequent (and obviously minimally informed) contributors. If anything, this article ought to be cited as a vivid illustration of why real encyclopaedias will always need to be produced for societies to continue a literate population... +The aforementioned news post contains no photo's. What are you talking about? +" | decline=I am hearing your out - first, your username violates our username policy and cannot ever be used on Wikipedia. Second, I cannot believe that your business is as notable as TD Bank - since Wikipedia is not a directory of business, the business would have meet the very strict notability requirements for businesses to be considered for an encyclopedia. We don't have personal profiles like on Facebook or LinkedIn that allow us to advertise. Finally, you have also given no suggestion on how your grandfather meets any of the notability requirements either - so I cannot proceed with an unblock based on what you provided. It's possible you have misunderstood the purpose of Wikipedia. (✉→←✎) " +Get fucked. Just so you know. ) +I thought I had uploaded it as a fair use public domain publicity photo. It was taken by FoMoCo for me and then released internally and externally into the public domain. The picture is of me and I believe that has been released publically. I think it is a fair use. Pehaps it should be recategorized, I thought I had mad the correct selection. Thanks. -BMcCJ +" It was only likely to get worse. And especially now the story has become even more troubling.. Яehevkor ✉ " +Funny Go away and cry to your mother! +" Rename the Article I think to resolve these disputes, we can move this article to Sea of Japan/East Sea, so both of the disputed names are included. TALK " +GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH! 'LIVE FREE OR DIE TRYING!' +I currently own a pug who is much brighter than any of the golden retrievers I have owned. We have to spell out words around our pug such as hungry, leash, or outside. She also fetches her leash on command, growls on command, sits, stays, fetches a toy by name ect... Pugs really are people pleasers and are very interested in their owners. Does that really make them bright? I don't know, but ours is certainly easy to train and communicate with. +you guys are idiots. I clearly don't care about editing articles on wikipedia apart from this, so ban me. I just don't understand why you are to delete this one, so fucking lame. +" What I may or may not know is not the issue here, so why not answer the question? Corbett " +If That Is The Case. Thank You. +When I tried to add a link to search results on the talk page of List of misquotations, it wouldn't let me. Instead, I had to resort to adding blank spaces to the URL. +December 2008 (UTC) I have been in contact with Jimbo and nothing I have said here or elsewhere is considered harassment or attacking. 75.91.169.43 04:04, 26 +Pics that we need Does anyone have: Anime pics of Hydrate, Byakko, Bebebe, Crimson, and LOVE A group pic of Over's Ultimate Five Assassins from ep. 30 A group pic of A Few Dangerous Thugs from ep. 38 Manga pics of Bababa, Bububu, and Shigeki X +need help refining our understanding of policy priorities +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Saint Louis Park High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk) " +but is it really notable? +" True, it is in a gray area, but the subject could not control the source, and there is nothing to gain from a sanctioning body giving an award to someone unworthy. I think we can be certain he earned the titles. The frustrating thing has been finding truly independent sources. My hope is that someone somehow can come up with better sourcing for this. I guess gray sources are better than none. Then there is the AfD debate. Does the fact the sport lacks main stream media coverage mean the sport and its champion's are not encyclopedic? Again a gray area, but sometimes if one is to risk erring, it's better to err on the side of the article if one cannot find certainty. In the past, I've seen a discussion go to keep based on similar, to me at the time, trivial coverage and miserable (to me) sources. Currently, I've been gnashing my teeth and wringing my hands over spending ours to come up with one or two measly sources of other articles. '''Cheers, ) Dlohcierekim''' " +" This user is a پختون, Pashtun. " +why why would you delete my post? something wrong? +" My comment is not threatening. Please go and show to whoever know Persian. I'm ready to use any Wikipedia:Dispute resolution which you'd like.(t-c) " +" Wapipedia Anyone here use it (http://wapipedia.org)? I'm kind of new to it, and there doesn't seem to be a talk/editing facility. So I'm going to post this here, hope that's okay. Their article on the Prophet Mohammed includes the following text: By his own standards, the continuing traditions of social justice in the Islamic World, of methods and knowledge of science, history and medicine as they evolved in the modern world (thanks to his profound influence driving Muslims to literacy and inquiry), and the prayers of over one billion Muslims, many of whom pray for him five times a day (or attach "" peace be upon him"" after each mention of his name), render Muhammad arguably the most influential man in all history, an honour often reserved for Jesus in the West. Even those historians who have deplored his influence and considered it to have retarded the growth of its chief rival faith, Christianity, express grudging admiration for the man. and this: To the traitors inside Medina it must have come as a surprise when the 10,000-strong force of Abu Sufyan failed to cross a trench dug around Medina by order of Muhammad, as the Persian scribe Salman e-Farsi had suggested to him. After the retreat of Abu Sufyan and his forces, the Muslims directed their attention towards the groups that had committed treason to the Charter of Medina. The munafiqun quickly crumbled, and their leader Abd Allah ibn Ubayy pledged allegiance to Muhammad. The Muslims then besieged the Banu Qurayza, who had intrigued against them. They had the opportunity of choosing Muhammad as an arbitrator, but instead the Banu Qurayza chose Saad ibn Muadh, the leader of their former allies, the Aus. And this is its take on the Battle of Badr, 624 CE, which is markedly different to that found in the Wikipedia article (which raises doubts about the aftermath of the battle): On March 15, 624 near a place called Badr, the two forces clashed. Though outnumbered 800 to 300 in the battle, the Muslims met with success, killing at least 45 Makkans, including Abu Jahl, and taking 70 prisoners; whereas only 14 Muslims died. To the Muslims this appeared as a divine vindication of Muhammad's prophethood, and he and all the Muslims rejoiced greatly. Following this victory, assassinations eliminated Medinans who had satirized Muhammad, and the victors expelled a hostile Jewish clan. Virtually all the remaining Medinans converted and Muhammad became de facto ruler of the city. I had the idea that Wapipedia was a direct transfer of Wikipedia articles onto Wap, but it seems not. Timbudds@acasa.ro" +You masturbate to photos of Ronald Reagan, don't you? Did you know his birthday is a national holiday in Iran? No one did more for the Islamic revolution (or the Taliban for that matter)than Reagan. +Hey, you freaking hermaphrodite. When you are bored, do you bend your dick down and stick it into your vagina? +Dominican University Just took a couple big swings with my meataxe to the article. Already MUCH less of PR piece. +i cannot export it because of missing rights management. And i only save over articles which are on deletion log, nothing else +" Others Expamples Mexico against Axis - Contributed Escuadrón 201, Pacific Argentina against Axis - Contributed Nothing - in terms of personnel. Rebuttal Quote ""We use the term ‘Grand Alliance’ or ‘Allies’ to describe an activated military alliance in WW1 that included Japan and Italy, and again use the term ‘Allies’ to describe on group in WW2 that does NOT include Japan and Italy. Not a big deal, except of course you can tell the ‘anti-Japanese’ wikipedia sites here because they do not mention Japan as a member of the ‘Allies’ despite it being and undisputed historical fact by English and Japanese historians. how I see it used in Asian history books"" WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Italy did change sides in WWII and a co-belligerent state supporting the allies established but the RSI was also set up a state in the North, however Japan was NEVER part of the allies in World War II! As for JAPANESE historians and history books – haven’t you heard about Japanese history textbook controversies . In WWI, Brazil declared war on Germany in 1917, however there was never any formal alliance signed between Brazil and the Entente, the Triple entente wasn’t even a formal alliance, but an agreement – there was a unity agreement, however that stated that they would not seek a separate peace with Germany. Britain only declared war on Germany after it invaded Belgium and the United States declared war on Germany and Austria Hungary in 1917 yet not on Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire. They are called allies because they were ‘’united for a common purpose’’ - the defeat of Germany and or of the Central Powers as a whole, American industrial strength in terms of munitions and armaments also bolstered the British, French and other allies. In WWII, the ALLIES were overall fighting a common enemy at one point in time, and had a common purpose. SOME countries declared war yet did not send personnel to fight but assisted in the the allies in economic or other forms(severing relations etc.). Allies amd Axis The Allies were those countries that joined together in an association against Germany then later Italy and Japan and those countries/movements associated with them(the Axis). In the beginning – Britain and it’s Commonwealth/Empire, France etc. and later countries that joined them against these powers including the US and Soviet Union and exiled governments. There were tensions between the powers especially Roosevelt - De Gaulle and Churchill/Roosevelt – Stalin, however there was mutual co-operation in the form of lend lease and other agreements. On January 1 1942 all of the belligerents signed a document called the Declaration by United Nations - the parties pledged to uphold the Atlantic Charter, to employ all their resources in the war against the Axis powers, and that none of the signatory nations would seek to negotiate a separate peace with Germany/Japan and the other member of the Axis. Not all of the countries delcared war on all of the members of the Axis immediately or some not at all – eg.Brazil only declaring war on Japan on 6/61945. Some countries like only declared war on Japan because they entered to late in the war like Chile, other countries like the Norway and Poland declared war on Japan yet they did not contribute forces against Japan. A Global War ""All I am saying is that if we want to portray that period of history accurately, that in the same way we do not include the Finnish Winter War nor the ongoing Chinese Civil War as part of what we call ww2, that we should record there being 2 separate wars: one in the ‘West’(Europe, Mediterranean) and one in the ‘East’(Pacific and East Asia), and therefore 2 separate groups of friends and foes, 2 separate formations of ‘Allies’. Then we also appear more moral historically."" ""What I am saying was that the war in Europe and the war in Asia were 2 separate wars. 2 separate groups of alliances. 2 separate military alliances we deliberately, or just simply irresponsibly, confuse by using the same title ‘Allies’ or ‘Grand Alliances’. Once we admit they were 2 separate wars, then it all makes more sense and make us look all the more moral."" ""So even today, we use the same title of an alliance to refer to 2 different wars at the very same time, in this case, right next to eachother even. But if you tell a Canadian, German or Hollander etc that they are members of the same ‘coalition’ at war in Iraq, they will take great offense at your ignorance."" ''""I can’t help but wonder if my student is right, and the reason western historian go along with inaccurately using the dangerously over-generalised +Funny how you constantly make up lies. I have not even made any personal attacks. +you will be reported as a racist you are obviously a bigoted racist, as you have not removed the page for Gordon (name) which is an article about a name. Yet you are removing articles about names of people from a nation you clearly have something against. But it does not surprise me, at all. Most people who deal with IT are of a limited intellectual capacity, especially when it copmes to evaluating their own shortcomings (cf. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/kateconnolly/3637231/Are_you_a_Fachidiot/ ), and even more so when they have not actually graduated from a university but are self-taugt like you appear to be. In any case, your blatant Serbophobia in removing start up articles about the names of a culture that you disparage is a disgrace to Wikipedia in English. BTW, I deleted the nonsense you posted on my talk page. Do not do that ever again. It is unwanted and unacceptable. I will not be posting here any more either, and I will report you to Meta Wiki as a racist unfit to work on the site. +" Redirect I dunno how to do dis but can someone redirect ""dino extinction"" to this page? That would be nice. 208.102.175.102 " +" What were originally ad lib responses from the audience are now as tightly scripted as any screenplay, and audience members who provide ""incorrect"" responses are angrily shouted down just as if they were being disruptive in a normal movie Is this really true and commonplace these days? ( I've understood that part of the enjoyment is to hear new callbacks from groupies who are, say, visiting your theatre from another side of the continent. The etiquettes I have seen caution against discriminating new groupies - after all, the show is supposed to be about having fun. " +Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted because... Hello this is manager of Edward Mavskegg. Please dont delete this page because this is true information about his works. Sorry for other try to post this article .Its because its the first time of using wikipedia. Thanks, John +" Shonene Sekai or Sekai Shonen? On the image it shows the Kanji reversed (printed as 世界少年). Which is the title? cowsrule " +"""Sly SOB"" is a somewhat common teasing expression, not a way to seriously call somebody a son of a bitch. Please learn the vernacular before commenting on it in the future, it will save you from some embarrassment. 204.69.190.254 " +" How rumours get started Here is how rumours get started. Ramsquire is caught again starting a rumour. RPJ: There is no chain of custody on the rifle. Ramsquire: ""Yes there is."" RPJ: Where? Ramsquire: ""Its not in the article."" and ""I'm not going to do any research for you."" RPJ: Ramsquire, please, just admit you made the whole story up about a there being ""chain of custody"" on the rifle. " +Thanks buddy. My hearty thanks to you. ) +As for 1) Croatia declared independence after the first armed conflicts. It is true that the war escalated after the declaration of independence, but it was certainly in existence before Croatia formally declared independence. As for 2) I agree that Yugoslavia could have went on without one or more republics, but the situation on the ground was that four out of six republics declared their independence during the war (events not necessarily linked to the war, but arguably influenced by it) and the Badinter Arbitration Committee said that in November 1991 - January 1992 SFR Yugoslavia dissolved, inter alia, due to Slovenian and Croatian independence votes. As for 3) that means that they did not change when situation before March 1991 and after November 1995 is compared. Of course the borders are the same since 1947 (by demarcation committees, not in 1943) but the first two dates specified are important here. Erdut Agreement and UNSC resolution 1037 define the territory as Croatian, the UN mandate as temporary and define the outcome as transfer to Croatian control. Furthermore expelling forces, civilians or troops leaving a country and UN mandates do not constitute territorial changes and should not be in this field at all. All of these issues are quite comprehensively addressed by the article itself. +that I would stay indoors too. +You have your word to say about the modalities of the Survey and if you'll accept the results? Othwise there is no need for a survey as you know that the results aren't binding. +Nallebombning An international incident when the Swedish were bombing Latvia and some Russians with teddy brears . On the teddy bears were slogans about human rights. The Russians were pissed. Nallebombning Can't find anythihg on any wiki about this. +failed to become an administrator and +"She's not ""White"" or Caucasian for that matter, a Castizo is just a lighter skinned Mestizo. " +I can't imagine how the following portion of the introduction can be modified to be relevant enough to the Big Bang theory to include so prominently. This exterpt is strictly a (poorly written, in my opinion) cosmogony discussion which the current Big Bang theory does not encompass. Could someone make modifications to this portion of the article which would make it relevent? Otherwise I'll delete it in a few days. 07:32, 2005 Jan 13 (UTC) There are actually many theories about the Big Bang. Some theories purport to explain the cause of the Big Bang itself (First cause), and as such have been criticized as being modern creation myths. Some people believe that the Big Bang theory lends support to traditional views of creation, for example as given in Genesis, while others believe that all Big Bang theories are inconsistent with such views. The relationship between religion and the Big Bang theory is discussed below. +Just because you believe it to be true that confirms it? I think not. The usercheck cleared my name. That is the last I want to hear about this muppet nonsense. +" (UTC) Criticism of Kanin section now again longer than Kanin I see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese in particular as exerting a bias on the page. A False Rape Denialist point of view is not a neutral point of view. In particular, criticism of Kanin's study is again longer than the Kanin section, and written very pointedly. The length alone is sign of denialist bias, but including unsubstantiated accusations (no methodology in Kanin's study) just because it can be quoted to David Lisak is probably abusive and misleading. Definitely unnecessary and in violation of a neutral point of view for an article that should focus on evidence for a phenomenon slightly more than its denial. Kanin himself pre-addressed the criticism of his study (http://anandaanswers.com/ananda-answers-an-alarming-national-trend-false-rape-allegations-2/). This information should be used to ""pad"" Kanin's section in order to appear balanced. 00:36, 4 April 2012" +" While in August 19, jimbo did change it to guideline, it was disputed for some time afterwards. SWATJester Denny Crane. " +Topperman Image Hi, I have attempted to clarify the copyright status of the mural itself. Let me know if there is any additional information you would like me to provide regarding the copyright status of this image. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rio de Janeiro. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   — (|contribs) " +" Old Talk Pages Archeive old talk pages instead of just deleting them. Make a page names User talk:67.175.216.90/Acheive1 and put all current comments on the page instead of just deleting it. Happy new year! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding , or to their talk page with a friendly message. " +" Yes, and that is a strawman, because all historical arguments involve hazards. Nobody has ever said that the AFS proves anything. Of courzse there are hazards. The quotes you are adding are heavily slanted toward saying it is ""invalid"" and a fallacy. That is quite different from surveying its strengths and weaknesses. You are misrepresenting sources and misrepresenting the discourse. Now you stop it. " +" ""Yeah, I had been thinking about changing that. I've now applied semiprotection. ^^^ " +I wonder if Wright's house is a tourist attraction like Johnny Adair's? +Annie Gaylor has jewish ancestry +Ridiculous. They are supposed to be the stereotypical 'men in black' government agent types, the green tint is indeed a result of the film tint. +Those were the official figures, which were allways assuming the best conditions, no head wind and possibly going down a large hill ect.. lol, quite simply in those days it was more than common for car makers to simply lie about things like this. In this day and age though the car makers have to actualy test the claims. +mercy naomi Mercy naomi is a young girl at hillside school at mateo st.and gess what se is nine years old. +Falun Gong is not a religion, it is a cult responsible for the deaths of thousands. +and jguk, could you also please discuss, before you go over the article with a lawnmower? This isn't some dilapidated unwatched piece, we have been carefully navigating it around looming edit-wars, before you came crashing it. e.g. we decided to have a separate Proto-Elamite article, after lengthy discussion, which you could kindly review before undoing it. (ᛏ) 9 July 2005 13:17 (UTC) +File:Nm Rihanna 090505 ssv.jpg I know the images I've uploaded in the past were not expectional but If you're suspicious of me copying the author and link (I swear I didn't this time), you can help upload the image at Wikipedia from the website. It's ABC News so I'm sure it's not from random website. Thank you. +|This is a Public computer and so should be unblocked so the general public can use Wikipedia. +" I believe that is a misconception. Basically, there was a dispute with a claim about premodern Chinese GDP per capita, but the relevant claim was later removed. I fail to see any further disputes with the article, as the disputing editor has no interest or had ever edited this topic before he entered a content dispute with me and decided to ""edit"" articles I wrote on other topics. " +GOD DAMN GOD DAMN it fuckers, i am using the GOD DAMN sand box +Absolute Nonsense This article is nothing but race-baiting politically-incorrect POV. Wikipedia has officially jumped the shark. +by the way, visit a website reddit .com +Nothing to see here, move along. +Sorry I am sorry for the attacks i made. All i want is a nice blowjob. I was hopping you would give me one. And also sorry to wiooiw. His was really fast. he also might like a blowjob or two from you. I bet you are really good at them.206.217.211.117 +" A barnstar for you! The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Salaam! Great job brother! " +hello = i have noticed that you have a dislike to me and that you are similar to osirisV. also, me, afletch, and osirisV go to the same school and you seem to only pay particular attention to this group, hmmm. also it seems you have blamed me for bujgits behaviour, saying that the user was a sock puppet of me, and only came to your attention when i informed osirisV. another thing is that i sent that picture of osirisV and the other individual to a lot of people, so i am not the only suspect for the distortion, and posting of the image on wikipedia. +reverted the edits. It prevents sandbox warnings. +OK, seems fair, we'll see if his opinion can be shifted at all -) +No it isn't. I came here specifically for this information and it is nowhere to be found. What a useless puff piece of an article. +does not contain a single reference, its politically laced hearsay from someone who doesn't like US +Fuller's Account of Battle Date The battle date is shortly after June 21-22, 168 B.C., after a recorded eclipse of the Moon, but the exact date is not known, according to J.F.C. Fuller. The Macedonians reportedly had some kind of outcry that defeat was at hand for them until the eclipse passed, and the Romans were given an explanation that the eclipse is part of nature and natural, so the Romans did not panic. +" The disagreement with Yeezus was over his insistence on using the term ""Rave Reviews."" I can't imagine any objective ""encyclopedia"" using such a subjective term. What is wrong with allowing reviews to speak for themselves, rather than spin something that is, in itself, already a spin? In the case of ""Reloaded,"" the two reviews I mentioned were from ""Rolling Stone,"" and ""Spin,"" magazine. And, contrary to Khanassassin's assertion that no reviews were overly positive, these two happened to be extremely so, with very little, if any, negative criticism. There were actually quite a few ""raves"" for the album, and I gave extra weight to Rolling Stone because it is a magazine often cited by Dan56, who's edting was serving as my model, and because Rolling Stone did not base their response on Minaj's ""rejection"" of hip hop, as some in the hip hop community see her actions. Being a more rock-base source, the review seemed quite nuanced and even-handed, while many of the hip-hop oriented magazines seemed annoyed with her ""pop"" side. " +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): DUUUR MY NAME'S ALEXF I AM STUPID Request handled by: 207.161.70.152 Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." +A Message to You Shadeed Hey, I think you're a lolcow. N!gg@. +Yes, I would but there is no button that lets that happen. +Listen wikipedia- I don't know what country you are from, and what doctrine you follow, but in the United States we will live free, and as long as you work to take freedoms away from us, we will fight you. LIVE FREE OR DIE TRYING! +" Oh, too late...>< Sigh...harasment. Lemmie get this clear. Don't plan to block you, my pip, final warning-block without my input at all. Sigh...I can still IP, right? Maybe I can get some work done on Davidson Seamount...Crushed, Mar " +Ironic that you would tell me to view the Talk rules...I was deleting sections of Talk pages which were being used as forums about the subject rather than discussion about the article. So STFU. +For the benefit of a newby can you explain? This is the first time I've received a warning, why is my last? While I’m a newcomer to Wikipedia editing, and definitely the terminology, I’m not to medieval history and genealogy. My attempt here was to clarify the article on Gundrada, Countess of Surrey and to add quality source citations. I do know quite a bit on the subject. I understood that the object here is to make articles better and that was what I was attempting to do. Could you please take a few minutes and explain what it was I might have done wrong? I carefully checked the page after editing and all links—everything worked perfectly. Then someone undid all the changes a few minutes later. I don't understand why no one even attempted to discuss this with me before rejecting the changes. Did I inadvertently step on someone’s toes? I really would like to see this article improved and I’d appreciate it if you could point me in the right direction. Thank you. Bearpatch +He is the head of the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at MIT and has been for a long time. I think that qualifies as being an important philosophers. +SA ConCon But surely it had something to do with his decision to hold the referrendum. It showed that people wanted a reduction in members terms from 8 to 4. This is the option being given at the ref, along with total abolishion (which won't happen, no way enough people will vote for it), as well as leaving it as is. The government is just being feasible by reducing half of the house as well, because if they ALL came up for re-election every 4 years, there would be 22 spots to give each election... looking at the PDF report, I would be very suprised if the referrendum result was anything but reduced terms/numbers. +have with them. +Kouzuki is definitely what she and nearly everyone else calls her. I'm think it should be changed that way in her article. 76.201.56.110 +I AM REALLY UPSET with his deletion nominations!!!! Sorry, but you are an asshole This is very insane to delete an article like this. You are asshole master of deletions 22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+685)‎ . . User talk:PatGallacher ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Patricia Walsh) (current) 22:18, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+299)‎ . . Patricia Walsh ‎ (Nominated page for deletion using Page Curation (subst:blp-prod)) 22:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+184)‎ . . Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism ‎ (Reporting Novaranist. (TW)) 22:10, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-33)‎ . . m Hans Kohala ‎ (Reverted 1 edit by Novaranist (talk) to last revision by Severo. (TW)) (current) 22:08, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-82)‎ . . Most Extreme Airports ‎ (current) 22:04, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861)‎ . . N User talk:Matt8600 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Iustin beldie) 22:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+678)‎ . . N User talk:Timostaurus ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Scott Wornow) 22:01, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+829)‎ . . N User talk:Mason Decker1 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Mario Kart/Characters) (current) 21:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+877)‎ . . N User talk:Nathanielpopoca ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Nathaniel Popoca) 21:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+865)‎ . . N User talk:Iustin444 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Matei Berceanu) (current) 21:56, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+417)‎ . . User talk:Novaranist ‎ (Only warning: Vandalism. (TW)) 21:54, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+858)‎ . . N User talk:Zachlyda ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Zachary Lyda) (current) 21:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+836)‎ . . N User talk:Novaranist ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pornography in North Korea) 21:49, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+8)‎ . . User:Tentinator/Articles Created ‎ (current) 21:48, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+143)‎ . . N User:Tentinator/Articles Created ‎ (←Created page with 'This is a list of all the articles that I've created. First Catilinarian Conspiracy Second Catilinarian Conspiracy In Toga Candida') 21:35, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+861)‎ . . N User talk:Jaylentable ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Beautybaby44) (current) 20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+883)‎ . . N User talk:Conservationscience ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Conservation evidence) (current) 20:12, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+844)‎ . . N User talk:Prasadaman ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Aman prasad) (current) 20:11, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+1,737)‎ . . User talk:Liberalufp ‎ (Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Word windowism. (TW)) 16:38, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+788)‎ . . N User talk:Lunedeep ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Lune deep) 16:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+830)‎ . . User talk:Blackiedog ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for List of King Kongs) 15:58, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+917)‎ . . N User talk:Giovz17 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Special/wiki/Special:Preferences) (current) 15:57, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+838)‎ . . N User talk:Jarmanpreet Sandhu ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Jarmanpreet sandhu) (current) 11:31, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+886)‎ . . N User talk:Rpriykant ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Moneyroot Consultancy) (current) 10:53, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+808)‎ . . N User talk:Pregish ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Pergasus Syangbo) 10:36, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+645)‎ . . N User talk:Shresthaprabhu ‎ (General note: Removal of content, blanking. (TW)) (current) 10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+850)‎ . . N User talk:Espabangalore ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Elements spa) (current) 10:33, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+855)‎ . . N User talk:Jadurkupi ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Music marketing) (current) 10:16, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+700)‎ . . User talk:Jb1944 ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for John Alderton (medic)) 10:03, 17 March 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+791)‎ . . User talk:Hikogaratashi ‎ (Notifying author of deletion nomination for Brooks kossover) (current) +I've been answering that question in almost every other post here on Wikipedia when I challenge you unethical debunkers on your under-informed deliberate misinformation you and yours keeps spewing onto the pages of Wikipedia. This is the THIRD time I'm asking you to explain what the Jupiter/Pluto midpoint in your natal chart is about and how has it been activated by Solar-arc Directions and what have been your experiences during those periods? The serious Astrologers I've meet since 1969 have high IQs. They're capable of keeping up their end of intelligent conversations. Is your inability to answer the above question an admission of limited wherewithall? Or if you don't get patted on the head by your favorite professor, an endeavor isn't worth the effort? +uncivil Tennis expert, you antagonize people with your wording, your questions and your manners of editing. I have seen too many examples of it to doubt it anymore. Now, it may be purposeful but I gave you the benefit of the doubt by asking you whether or not you are aware of it. Maybe you aren't and someone at wiki can help you shed some of the abrasiveness so as not to seem so mean. I realize this post is also abrasive and I wouldn't have made it if you had not also written on my page such an abrasive sentence. If you don't think what you wrote on my page was uncivil and antagonistic then you are either ignorant or stupid. Again I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you were ignorant of that fact. But now that I have brought it to your attention the ignorant card will no longer be valid. Please refrain from bothering me again and I will do likewise. +. clearly im expressing the truth as the australian commiunity see these people +Peel Police Censorship and Vandalism Amazingly the Peel Police themselves continue to attempt to censor this Wikipedia article. The IP Address: 204.138.85.6 has been responsible for a number of vandalisms where the “Controversies” section of this article is completely blanked out without explanation. Seen here: [] You’ll notice that the Peel Police also have time, while on duty, using computers and internet access paid for by tax payers’ dollars to edit articles ranging from the Phoenix Roadrunners IHL team, to questions on “Tampon Usage”. A simple WHOIS lookup shows that 204.138.85.6 is in fact registered to the Peel Regional Police. IP Addrss: 204.138.85.6 OrgName: Peel Regional Police OrgID: PRP Address: 7750 Hurontario Street City: Brampton StateProv: ON PostalCode: L6V-3W6 Country: CA NetRange: 204.138.80.0 - 204.138.87.255 CIDR: 204.138.80.0/21 NetName: PRP NetHandle: NET-204-138-80-0-1 Parent: NET-204-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Assignment NameServer: NS1.EASYDNS.COM NameServer: NS2.EASYDNS.COM NameServer: REMOTE1.EASYDNS.COM NameServer: REMOTE2.EASYDNS.COM Comment: RegDate: 1994-08-30 Updated: 2007-04-20 OrgNOCHandle: DBA70-ARIN OrgNOCName: Bachuk, David OrgNOCPhone: +1-905-453-2121 OrgNOCEmail: OrgTechHandle: GBI3-ARIN OrgTechName: Bignell, Gary OrgTechPhone: +1-905-453-2121 OrgTechEmail: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.244.251.246 +YOU ARE VERY BLIND AND SUBJECTIV EE A, HOW COULD YOU WRITE SUCH A TEXT WHEN I WASN'T AT ALL IN ALL THE DISPUTE ABOVE, AND WHEN YOU COULD OBVIOUSLY SEE THAT A TEXT OF MINE WAS MISSING AND THAT YBM HAD GIVE IT THE TITLE GARBAGE, FOR WHO WILL CALL HIS OWN TEXT GARBAGE, BUT YBM....? +Isn't it obvious? He is Rialian the owner of Rialian.com +That's for debate at the talk pages above. Please take your discuss there. Thank you. +IFA Paris was deleted because the community consensus said it should be. No two articles are alike and each one stands or falls on its own merits, so I am unable to entertain suggestions that because another article exists, yours should also. It won't be possible to reinstate the article unless further and better reliable sources can be provided to show that the school is properly notable. You'll also need to review the conflict of interest rules. +WIKI NAZI! That's all you are, you even remove my post for help and have the nerve to accuse me of vandalizing for asking for help in the correct area using the correct method, your a loosre and I can clearly see why no one relies on wikipedia anymore. NAZI F AG GOT CO CK SU CKER! +":: I agree, someone should change this map, it clearly states ""the Soviet Union and its allies"" - in red, and ""Non-aligned and neutral countries"" in green. Yugoslavia was founder and member of Non-aligned movement and therefore the map is inaccurate and misleading. " +Threatened, and I've come out victorious, because I was right. I win. +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! +oh shit you gon get banned +" In that case we should add Jews for Jesus and Rael links... since you are arguing that a group that worships ""The Rebbe"" as a god, read ""Tanya"" instead of ""Torah"" is considered Jewish. They are not considered Jewish by most normative standards, have caused a lot of anti-Semitism, Rabbinical Council of America has specifically denounced them, yes they are a rich cult because of people that do not know better and because of the scandalous activities they are involved in but that does not make them Jewish nor should we be corrupt and bind to their money." +Vandals of the worthless Fuckipedia UNITE. FUCK THE SLIME ADMINS. FUCK THEM AND LISTEN TO THEM BEG FOR MORE. +you are erasing ES&L; threats, this is not harassment. 213.37.84.214 +Bond Argument, will move to bottom +He's alive and still faking his stunts. +I cannot contiue this page today, I have too many things to do. Please start the other realms. +Infobox standardization support You have voted for the suggestive title Infobox standardisation on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Infobox standardisation even though your comment indicates that you are actually against standardization creep or at least do not support it unconditionally. VfD for these cases offers the option to vote move to NPOV title. Comment on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Infobox standardisation if you want the page to be moved, for instance to Wikipedia:Should we have instructions to standardize infoboxes?. +I see what you mean now. I'm just not that experienced at editing on this website. C4pt4in W1k1 +" You have stated your case on the talk page. It was not, by the majority of the editors of this page, considered to be much more than an unconvincing vindication of trolling. Therefore, the page was reverted, and will be reverted ad infinitum until someone comes up with new information or better elucidation of the already discussed themes. For the time being-you're just one among many Serbian trolls. Pity only 6-10 Serbian users are definitely not Greater Serbian propagandist sickos, but, as Ned Kelly had said, ""sich is life"". " +Request to add Neo-Mongoloid on top page As you can clearly see from the pictures, most of these Ameridians have an proto-mongoloid which looks non-asiatic. While eskimo ameridians clearly have an neo-mongoloids like Asia. （Talk） 10:31, 29 2012 March 2012(UTC) +severe harm from having two articles on the same topic, editing goes to two articles that makes two okay articles instead of one good one. +edit I intergrated the pages, so now when you go to the name Bill Kaulitz. It will redirect to the new page. +" Broad Ripple Carousel... I've handed it off to Awadewit to do some prose polishing. I've added some pictures, but if the museum has any they want to replace those with, now is the time. Likewise if anyone's found any old pictures of the carousel that can be released. I found nothing in the Indiana Historical Society archives online, but I confess I'm not the best at that sort of thing. There really isn't that much to add, except I have one or two travel books I want to check out real quick, for any ""best place to visit"" type hype that can be found. - Talk " +Cranial Analysis edits 216.234.128.8: Sforza's study was indeed limited in this way. However, Passarino was far more thorough in his research (all major Ethiopian ethnicities, plus Somalians), and it is to his studies that I'm referring. Therefore, the (valid) criticism of the limitations of Sforza's study is, first, completely irrelevant in light of Passarino's findings and second, it just clutters up the already all-too-large article. Also, do NOT delete the counterview point to the criticism of Brace's study. The article deals with a CONTROVERSY, it is not a tool to advance Afrocentric (or Eurocentric) views. Keep that in mind. +Ahhh okay, so that's why Himler tried to recruit Bosniaks to form his largest SS division, considering what he thought of Slavs (Servs or Serbs) do you think he would have alowed Bosniaks to be the lead in his most feared and pure aryan storm troopers? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Paramore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. | Talk " +Thanks for suggesting it; I'll add that to my watchlist. It would help if people actually read the FAC requirements before listing I've seen articles go by with dubious fair use claims, with clearly incorrect license tags, with no copyright information at all, and even a few outright copyvios. +" I didn't think the two signatures could make a difference but i can see why they could be troubling there as two joke names of 16 could make that whole side look like a joke. 20 " +Deleted user page I have been unblocked by arbcom. You deleted my user page. Please undo your delete. Thank you. +" I'm done Thanks for that, I've copied what I need to written an article so if you'd be kind enough to re-delete it, I'd be much obliged. Also, any chance you could provide me with the history so I can note it over there for attribution? thanks a lot, | Penny for your thoughts? " +FYI I enjoy licking strangers scrotal sacks...especially hairy ones. Yum. +" Thanks! Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User page.  RasputinAXP  c " +" I apologise for reverting your edit on Sunderland A.F.C.. Regards. Caldron " +Earliest appearance? The Pinapple bun is at least 70 years old, according to the article. How far back can we trace Melon pan? +" My Sig Hello Nick, thanks for asking. My sig contains the font Vivaldi. Cheers.__ ♪ hmmm, odd Its a pay to view font...its not on my compy...how did you get it on yours? - — Talk/Contribs Signpost updated for November 27th. Weekly Delivery Volume 2, Issue 48 27 November 2006 About the Signpost Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles Steward elections begin Group apologizes for using Wikipedia name in online arts fundraiser News and notes: 1.5 million articles, milestones Wikipedia in the News Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Signpost updated for December 4th. Weekly Delivery Volume 2, Issue 49 4 December 2006 About the Signpost {| align=""center"" cellspacing=""20"" width=90% style=""background-color:transparent;"" | width=50% | Arbitration Committee elections open | width=50% | The Seigenthaler incident: One year later |- | width=50% | Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser | width=50% | Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another |- | width=50% | [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-12-04/News and notes|News and notes: Stewa +hi. wow. you are such a geek. bullshit mother fucker. +Has been taken care of. +Sales Tax Remittance Question I'm confused about sales tax remittance. That is, say I am in Utah, and I sell something to someone in New York, and I'm required to collect sales tax from the New York resident on behalf of the state (and city?) of New York then where do I send the money that I collected? It seems crazy that I might have to send a thousand checks to a thousand cities. It seems even more ridiculous that I would have to fill out paperwork for a thousand cities. How does this really work in practice? +Second AfD question How does one create a second AfD page? Viable Vision was recently deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viable Vision, but someone recreated it. Then it was nominated for speedy, which was changed to prod, which was contested on the talk page with no edits to the article. Since someone seems to think it should be kept, I started its AfD, only that leads to its old page...I know there's a way to fix that, but I don't know how... +" I actually haven't made any content contributions to that article, only minor MoS edits. But I'll see if I can track down some refs when I have a bit of free time. ™ " +" ""Unavoidable"", rather. Amalthea " +What are you talking about, can you point out the disinformation, either in my comment or in my edits? You are welcome to correct any factual inaccuracies in my edits. +Italy? Why did Italy disappear? It was a founding member of nato. Is this a bug? I swear it was here before, but now there's no mention of Italy at all. +With a heavy heart, I have restored the balance of Dmcdevit's original block in order to seek consensus for an unblock at WP:ANI. My apologies. Unblock request +" War Child links to a disambiguation page, we don't link to disambiguation pages from see also. I made a wrong guess that it was referring to war baby, since military brat was already linked. ""War"" is a common word which every English-speaking reader can be assumed to know the meaning of. We don't link to obvious related topics like that. " +" use of ""centroid"" to denote military test range center I understand the argument that this is a different application of the term and I agree that perhaps a seperate page could be made for it, but is that really necessary? There are other examples in Wikipedia where a minor-use of a term is denoted on the same page where the majority-use of the term is explained. My understanding is that the test-range use of the term also stems from the maths term itself, so it has the same root." +Should we add Template:Infobox CVG extended and Template:Infobox CVG end to the templates for deletion? I'll take care of it, I just want to make sure you have no need for them anymore before I do. 01:27, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) +Its so simple. If you have a proxy located in Japan, you can easily fool people that you are editing from Japan! +) Is it possible to retrieve the page at [Dhaka Electricity Supply Authority? It was there on the net, but now I can't find it anymore. May be it's preserved as an archive somewhere, right? 12:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC +Refer you to my talk page for response to your comment. Please be courteous enough to sign your posts in the future +Stirling, I don't see where Rhobite is threatening you. It looks like he's just reminding you that you're expected to play by the rules, as there is apparently an edit war. Could you suggest exactly where in the two comments above, the threats are, and what they're threatening? 18:05, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC) +The issue is not about them being described as an Irish band. You have proved yourself intransigent despite my pointing it out many times, which I assume is deliberate because I have made this so clear. +January 2016 (UTC) Except the video I haven't seen anyone naming him as Mohammed Afroz except the video of IndiaToday earlier tagged there and as far as I remember the Delhi police never revealed his name. So I am highly doubtful. Despite whatever his name is, WP:BLPNAME prevents from naming someone whose name has been intentionally omitted officially including in court records and isn't allowed to be named publicly. In the case of a rape victim, the family can reveal the name and the family of Nirbhaya did. However the juvenile isn't allowed ti be named under Juvenile Justice Act. Additionally the victimisation and probable threat on his life if his name is revealed also makes another case why his name shouldn't be there whether the name the sources gave might be wrong or true. Therefore, I am in agreement the previous edit versions containing all the various versions of his real name like Sunil and Mohammed Afroz should be deleted. 04:06, 8 +You've already violated the 3RR rule. I do not understand your rampant hostility to making this page conform to the very policy that you suggested should be followed. Do you realize how absolutely insane that is?129.133.124.199 +Another way to look at it is that, it is important and necessary to inform that Mussolini was a fascist, because that piece of information has profound implications to the reader; fascism is a controversial issue. But since all boys schools are less of a political issue, your analogy is useless. - +Last I checked Wikipedia was run out of (God blesss) America!!! +I think this page should be improved, as it jumps too fast from going to Hollywood to suddenly becoming a star. It doesn't explain about her early singing career and jumps to fame. +ref desk cheers steve +Speedy delete nomination of messesarymist bulacan Hello MopSeeker. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Messesarymist bulacan. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.. +Amber Diceless Roleplaying Game +Stargate Portal In response to your message. A bunch of links at the bottom don't make a portal useful. They only clutter it. If you want to make it useful, suggest new ways to improve it, don't just dump a bunch of links in it. +Erachima, there is no dramatic conflict going on there, and I am not associated with the recent editors who opened a complaint against +Ok Phoenix of9, now you are arguing with 3 veteran editors of this article who do not approve of your edits, +The Reality of the Wikipedia It is clear that the worst proclaimed by the opponents of the Wikipedia is true. That it is more interested in appeasing the egos of those in charge than pursuing the concept of dispassionate information. When a female editor is able to suppress the revelation of a complete quote, which refutes her desire that only two words of that same quote were true, because a male editor is too infatuated to reject her perversion of the truth, then the Wikipedia has rejected ANY pretense to being more than what it is, which isn't much. Thus my withdrawal from editing. I have not so much of life left that I can waste it. +" http://www.oregonlive.com/marijuana/index.ssf/2015/07/world_famous_cannabis_cafe_set.html - (Talk) " +Your welcome You deserve to have a lot of barnstars for your amazing work here. You should be thenking yourself for it and not me. Have a nice week and god bless. +Filing a Abuse report against you Case now open: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. +" The difference between loudness and sound volume (SPL) is far from obvious to many casual Earthling readers. Worth pointing out in this context? I already said I think so. If you don't care about the link, then don't click on it. Occam's Razor? What competing theories are being tested here? If you mean ""Apply some parsimony,"" why be parsimonious with connections to other information in an encyclopedia? _ " +I think your making a gross exgageration. Do you think the Ian Brady article should mention his current location. The point of the article is to describe Ashworth and whilst Brady is not typical having a reference to him aides that. +ACMEMan ACMEMan is not gsnguy. That's a lie! See my in my talk page. now. +I am currently waiting to hear if citing refs from a book to illustrate the point about UFOs would be a way around the WP:Primary issue, in the middle of this you permanently ban me. Charming. +Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Polandball Hi there, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Polandball. 213.243.174.104 +" It has also been categorised seperately under ""Criticism"" so that there is no confusion with the main article " +" That's deluded [A delusion is a fixed belief that is either false, fanciful, or derived from deception] and the only way a person can be that deluded [i refrained from saying anything earlier since it would have been an accusation] is if the person believes their is truth to these statements or believes them himself and you clearly claimed that in your reply. ""The intent isn't to insult, and the statement has a basis. If a critical statement has a basis, it qualifies as a criticism."", ""He has a basis, grounded in historical facts and his own personal sense of morality, for claiming Muhammad is a mass murderer and a pedophile."" study the life of Muhammad before attempting to lecture others on history. one observation regarding you definition of an insult, many of these where witnessed by Muslims or intended directly at Muslims so if you have no objection we should remove the ones that fall into this category. Putting aside your warped definition of an insult [which is the equivalent of a tree falling in the woods analogy and if no one heard it [the insult] does it still make a sound [is it still an insult]] these statements are clearly intended as slander, defamatory and anti Islamic propaganda not criticisms which present some sort of argument against the thing being criticized [and not single word labels,slogans, or insults] and that is their intent to ferment an anti Islamic feeling [as you clearly acknowledge above] by manipulating and selectively choosing historical facts or more accurately ""Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda. Propaganda can be used as a form of political warfare."" their is NO argument being put forth to appeal to peoples intellect and that is what differentiates criticism from insults, defamatory statements, propaganda and calumny. You also still haven't replied to this ""If a statement is inadmissible for content policy reasons at an article XYZ, then it is also inadmissible at a spinout Criticism of XYZ"""" " +fire department alert We're having trouble tonight with a vandal, see Wikipedia:Block log. Some suspect it is the same user as 08:13, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC) +Dimitri & Nina Well, thank you so much for your reply. I hoped you would! About six months ago I noticed how badly ballroom dancing in general was being treated on WP, and decided to do something about it. I had been taught dancing by someone who had taken tuition in the latin dances from Pierre & Lavelle, so I knew their names from being a teenager in the 1950s. I wish now I had taken the trouble to meet them, but I didn't. Since I'm something of an expert on Cuban music I decided to start with the group of dancers who started LA dancing in England, from where it has spread all over the world. I soon discovered the lack of reliable reference sources was the main problem. I kept seeing references to Pierre, but it was ages before I had enough to put up the page on WP. I still don't have enough for Lavelle. With difficult cases I start a Word file offline. Anything on WP gets copied by bots and plagiarised widely. Even these personal pages. I've got copies of all the books written about LA dances at that time, including both Dimitri's books and Pierre's book. I don't know where you are, of course, but if you are somewhere in England, we might arrange to meet, and you could have a look at the books. It sounds as though you don't have a copy of his first book. I've tried to interview all the survivors from that time. So far, I've only found two. I'd certainly like to meet your father if he was willing. He's bound to have lots of things tucked away at the back of his mind which might help us. And I'll answer more fully about myself, but not on WP (for reason given above) Now I'm going to let you have my e-mail address. If you wish, you could send me an e-mail, which would automatically give me yours. Then, once you know your e-mail has worked, please wipe off my e-address from this page after you've stored it, preferably on a private machine rather than one available for general use (open machines without good security get scanned regularly). Here goes: inmanross@hotmail.com Regards, +" I am confused here. I posted something about both of the publically funded Waldorf schools in Sonoma County, not an 'individual school,' and that information comes from official sources (so it is properly sourced), and the information provides information which contradicts the 'Official' Waldorf position. I do not believe that the 'official' statement of the Waldorf committee reflects their reality. Anti-immunization is so highly correlated with the Waldorf schools I have looked at as to be close to official policy. Waldorf schools in the US education as practiced in the US includes a substantial anti-immunization Concerns over immunizations The current text refers to a 'consensus statement' which is a dead link. This page http://www.waldorfanswers.org/QuestionsMore.htm refers to a growing anti-immunization movement within and outside of Waldorf schools, but again refers to the same dead link as the 'consensus statement' on vaccinations. The article does not cite a verifiable source on the policy of Waldorf education towards vaccinations. The article does say ""Studies have found Waldorf pupils to have a lower incidence of allergies and allergic-like symptoms, an effect which correlated with the extent to which they lived an ""anthroposophic lifestyle"" generally - in particular with reduced use of antibiotics, antipyretics, and measles, mumps and rubella vaccination"" Which is a deep violation of NPOV - to assert a correlation when there is a deep selection bias in the cited studies. I will replace the immunization section with something sourced unless it is properly sourced." +, 21 July 2011 (UTC) No one is disputing that a debate exists over the proper naming convention, the question is over the degree to which that debate should be reflected in the name of the article. I'm all for delineating the various points of view on why one name is used by one group of people, and the article does a good job of that. But as you point out the most widely used name is FGM, and if a 4.5 or 3 to 1 ratio is not a significant majority than I don't know what it is. Secondly, the pov issue is very much with the people here and not with the literature. Lets be clear about the rationale of the UN bodies which have opted to use the term FGC. According to their own websites (and this page), they use the term FGC in communities where the term FGM may be seen as counterproductive to the goal of reducing the occurrence of FGM. They do not use it in their published literature and their websites make it clear that it is an application of the term for case-specific scenarios and not as an overall attempt to cease the use of the term FGM. 19:48 +other people's Gosh you can't even speak English which you claim to be your mother tongue. Puh-lease. +Second warning, same as above. You have also violated WP:3RR. +" Speedy deletion of ""Cheyne Kulessa"" A page you created, Cheyne Kulessa, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. " +Antifreeze article Hi, Andy Dingley. Perhaps you'd be interested in giving a statement in this discussion, especially since you also objected to removal of medical information from the section in question and I mentioned that in the discussion? 134.255.247.88 +Sources to investigate Block, Adam Source:TABAdvocate; 6/5/90 Issue 552, p42, 2p, 1bw Abstract:TABProfiles Patrick Fitzgerald, gay lead singer of the British trio Kitchens of Distinction. Personal background; Career history; Albums released by Fitzgerald's group; Views on homosexuality. +What a hypocrite this creep Chavez is! From the main article about Hugo Chavez: Chávez was raised a Roman Catholic, although he has had a series of disputes with both the Venezuelan Catholic hierarchy and Protestant groups like the New Tribes Mission. He has traditionally kept his own faith a private matter, but over the course of his presidency, Chávez has become increasingly open to discussing his religious views, stating that both his faith and his interpretation of Jesus' personal life and ideology have had a profound impact on his left-wing and progressivist views. He often invokes God and asks for prayer in speeches, as he did when he asked Venezuelans to pray for Fidel Castro's health. I find it ironic that an atheist such as Hugo Chavez would ask the Venezuelan people to pray to God for another atheist's (Fidel Castro) health! This just shows what a hypocrite and liar Chavez is! +Your reason for declaring this a hoax is plainly something else. I have just reported you to Wikipedia administration, also for removing appropriate tags. +Fröttmaning is just a district in Munich. It has no article and probably never will. (, Don't create it just to make a point.) So, I will delete it once again. +Well, I didn't put the second map in (only the third one), so it's fine with me if you want to remove it. 13:36, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC) +I've given a full source; Carey was the critic. What other portions of the article require rewriting? (I've become pretty lousy at this.) — | talk +Propose we rename the article Mega CD The systems name is Mega CD not Sega CD that title was only used in one region and has no notabillity94.172.127.37 +Deletion request on Commons The deletion of Image:The Gates - Around Bend.jpg was asked some time ago on Commons for copyright reasons. If this picture is deleted, the whole Commons:Category:The Gates is threatened as well. This debate has not attracted many comments on Commons. As a Commons sysop, I'm in favour of the deletion, but I'd like to get more input.  (Λέγετε) +" Solo Beatles Can anyone confirm that the solo Beatles albums listed were all on MFP, and not (as I have an inkling) on one of EMI's other budget labels? Also, I'm pretty sure Ringo's ""Ringo"" and ""Blast From Your Past"" were also re-released on MFP." +Some ratings from the VCHip 1. The Power: TV-PG-L (hell, shit, pissed) 2. Just Set Up the Chairs: TV-PG-V (the Destroyer of World murders) 3. Caffeinated Concert Tickets: TV-PG-D (lady pecs = boobs, real reason people go to concerts is too see hot girls) 4. Death Punchies: TV-PG-V: (death kwon do, Rigby's bare ass) 5. Free Cake: TV-PG-L: (pissed) 6. Meat Your Maker: TV-PG-L-V (pissed, cannibalistic hot dogs) 7. Grilled Cheese Deluxe: TV-PG (purple nurple, suggestive touching) 8. The Unicorns Got to Go: TV-PG-D-V (lady flashbacks, risque goth lady, eating crotch balls, attack of the unicorns) 9. Prank Callers: TV-PG (brain tumor) 10. Don: TV-PG-D (Don reveals all the characters are naked, sugar seems gay) 11. Rigby's Body: TV-PG-L (sucks, turds) 12. Mordecai and the Rigbys: TV-PG (crotch humps) 13. Ello Govnor: TV-PG-V (evil taxi) 14. It's Time: TV-PG-D (Rigby tongue-kissing Margaret, discussing how good movies have sex) 15. Appreciation Day: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 16. Peeps: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 17. Dizzy: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 18. My Mom: TV-PG-D (my mom jokes imply sex) 19. High Score: TV-PG (GBF kicked in the crotch) 20. Rage Against the TV: TV-PG-V (kick him in the junk, Hammer's killings) 21. Party Pete: TV-14-D (guests with breasts line, breast zoom-ins, sexual dancing with Pops, Pete's groin lump shown) 22. Brain Eraser: TV-14 (naked Pops seen throughout whole episode, implied long penis scene, junk) 23. Benson Be Gone: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 24. But I Have a Receipt: TV-PG-V (the stabbing) 25. This is My Jam: TV-PG (gutters, crotch humps) 26. Muscle Woman: TV-14-D-S (junk, tongue-kiss, big breasted Starla) 27. Temp Check: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 28. Jinx: TV-PG-V (Jinx monsters attack, NSFW remark on dirty raccoon, naked people) 29. See You There: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 30. Do Me a Solid: TV-PG (shake weight) 31. Grave Sights: TV-PG-V (zombies) 32. Really Real Wrestling: TV-PG-V (wrestlers) 33. Over the Top: TV-PG-V (Rigby's death) 34. The Night Owl: TV-PG-D (second base 35. A Bunch of Baby Ducks: TV-PG 36. More Smarter: TV-PG 37. First Day: TV-PG 38. Go Viral: TV-PG (panties) 39. Skunked: TV-PG 40. Karaoke Show: TV-PG 41. Stick Hockey: TV-PG (chinese man named Chong, like ching chong 42. Bet to Be Blonde: TV-PG (blonde stereotypes) +" For an admin, you've got a pretty weak grasp of the concept of a ""revert"". Hint: that first diff doesn't count. 24.177.120.138 " +Nope. I don't really care. I take no part nor interest in Commons which I see as a failure project of WMF and a ticking bomb. If someone uploads my images there, it is their busyness on maintaining it. I put on all images I upload to the Wikipedia. If the image gets deleted from Commons, I will upload it to Wikipedia and will decide on the best license. Irpen +hi u can delete it was a mistake +" This section should be removed or put on a secondary page. Preloaded content is not important enough to deserve such a large portion of the article. Perhaps something like ""The Halo edition contains x halo trailers and y red vs blue episodes"" would be appropriate, but a full listing just clutters the article. " +" So you are now arguing that it's the paper that the money could theoretically be printed on, or the magnetic flux patterns on a computer's disk, or the ink on the central bank's ledger that means it's not created out of nothing? I suggest if you want to see the sort of confusion people are having you look in Archive 1 at comments, in fact I'm going to put the comment here. This is from someone who is an editor of the QE page and declares they have a BS Economics 2006, MA Applied Economics 2008 and work as Investment Analyst at 60B institutional fund"" ""Banks started to hold excess reserves after Lehman collapse, essentially as a response to the central bank liquidity measures at the time. That is where the money (600B+) came from, primary dealers gave it to the central bank/fed. Myself and other people have posted several authoritative references to the actual mechanics of QE, yet you still insist that you're correct because you read it in a BBC news article. Again, there is no money created out of thin air to fund the fed purchases. It's been proved over and over."" Flux patterns on computer disk are in no way tangible assets that can be constituted as not nothing in this context." +Ironically, the user that insists on Britannica's numbers from the early 1900s complains that CIA's numbers are not recent enough. +Please change my name back to red I have no idea how to do this, but I much prefered it when my name was in red. Since it was you who changed it, I want you to undo what you did. Thanks. +" Theology Hi, Nathan! Great article! One thing that really jumped out at me, however, was your claim that ""It is the Christian perspective that the spirit will ultimately prevail when the flesh becomes obsolete."" This sounds more like dualism than orthodox Christianity. It is my understanding that God desires to redeem the whole person and that is why Christians speak of bodily resurrection and the creation of a new heaven and a new earth. I would consider revising this statement. 23:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +. Hope that explains things o +September 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +I was thinking that but didn't like to point it out. I thought that might be getting a bit close to a direct insult. It's hilarious. Where do these contributors come from? (Talk) +Thanks. Do you know about how many members there are of Magic Castle, and Magic Circle? Could you reach out through your contacts to check if he's ever been a member? +Definitions Soap box 1. TABAlso, soap box. an improvised platform, as one on a street, from which a speaker delivers an informal speech, an appeal, or political harangue. ha⋅rangue    /həˈræŋ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [huh-rang] Show IPA noun, verb, -rangued, -rangu⋅ing. –noun 1. TABa scolding or a long or intense verbal attack; diatribe. 2. TABa long, passionate, and vehement speech, esp. one delivered before a public gathering. 3. TABany long, pompous speech or writing of a tediously hortatory or didactic nature; sermonizing lecture or discourse. kangaroo court   –noun 1. TABa self-appointed or mob-operated tribunal that disregards or parodies existing principles of law or human rights, esp. one in a frontier area or among criminals in prison. 2. TABany crudely or irregularly operated court, esp. one so controlled as to render a fair trial impossible. +SHIMMER Yeah, I've noticed that too, however I don't have the capability to ban the guy. You should contact someone else. +This is real unprecedented, no discussion was allowed before, no discussion is allowed now. +2011 (UTC) There is most certainly a link for it in the Film adaptations section. 06:59, 23 June +Let me say this and make it perfectly clear. YOU ARE NOT A MAN. I NEVER SAID YOU WERE A MAN. I AM NOT A MAN I HAVEN'T SAID I WAS A MAN. Only that in terms of HIV risk factors you and I and every other transwomen need to wake up, smell the coffee, and realize that we have the SAME risk factors as MSM's. In some sectors of the transcommunity they have recognized this. +they rock and Nat is cool and lucky your lucky Nat your awsome you to Alex +" Image:Heroes.S1.full.cast.jpg I've fixed the copyright tag, and also put in a request at the village pump for someone to help fix the fair-use rationale, so someone may contact you about that. Maybe someday I'll be able to make sense of that template. (talk|Contribs) " +Block I have just been blocked by user FeloniousMonk for issues surrounding the entry on Christopher Michael Langan. This entry has been fraught for some months, but my contribution has been confined to the last week or so. I acted several days ago on a longstanding request by the subject of the entry to remove what he considers a potentially libelous section of the entry. User Jimbo Wales judged the section to be blatant original research and deleted the section. This followed many months in which several editors, including FeloniousMonk, refused to see any problem with the section. Some editors were needless to say displeased with this correct decision by Mr Wales, and argued against it, although they did not try to re-place the deleted section. I have provided extensive arguments on various other content issues to do with the entry. Progress was being made toward improving the article, but some users whom I consider clearly biased against the subject of the entry, had difficulty accepting these arguments. Other editors agreed with my arguments, which were extensively but politely put. Some editors changed their position on some issues, such as the issue of whether to include certain links, which user Arthur Rubin originally opposed the inclusion of (deleting them with little reason given), later acknowledging that inclusion of the links was legitimate. FeloniousMonk is an editor involved with the entry, and he is blocking for reasons of a content dispute. This is in violation of policy. In addition, he has not provided any arguments why my edits are sanctionable. I do not believe there was a problem with my edits, the vast majority of which were confined to the talk page of the entry, and I would ask any administrator to examine my record. My userpage contains some links at the bottom to recent important edits in relation to this entry, including many by myself. Some users implied that I was in fact a sock-puppet for the subject of the entry. I realised just before this block was placed that a checkuser request was conducted a couple of days ago that showed I was unrelated to Langan. I in fact live outside the United States, do not know the subject, am not a proponent of his ideas, and am not a proponent of intelligent design. I have stated this previously on several occasions. A link to the checkuser request is located at the bottom of my user page. This block is a clear violation of policy by an administrator, and an abuse of power. +" Spelling, etc. – (talk) " +Wasn't the banner congratulating the contributors before? Is that suddenly pointless to do? +Is Zakk wylde racist naming the band Lynyrd Skynhead +Hey, what I put on the Talk page is none of your business. I made no edit to the page proper. 71.102.2.128 +" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 130.132.200.111). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. '''' (0_o) " +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 13:30, 2 November 2013‎" +Congrats! I'm sure you'll do a fine job. +Go away then you damn, wicked paid loser. +what i mean is that as a fan group we are tight........and that the case was also picked up by various others.......as i had picked it up from somebody else.......check the edits and you can probably tell based on the various different IPs........but i guess logic isnt something you guys understand at all see how that works?? again........im not sure which of you idiots came to the conclusion that i had created another account........but i would suggest showing me some sort of proof to that if not......i expect my account to be re-instated as of today.......which it was originally going to to be +i'm no kin to the monkey/the monkey is no kin to me...shoot me now, so that i may suffer no longer +The criticism section is silly and contains no criticism. If this guy was threatening to others, let's please have some kind of example in the text of the article. +is in the discussion page where a suggestion is made. WTF? +" hey warrens, fuck you too. ""Uncivil manner, means me trying to elaborate on my arguments and getting revert on revert that's what uncivil means. So yeah your a big winner champ and won't get banned. Asshole. Since the vista article contains information about the anti trust situation which, since it seems some people here have got a mouthful of gate's balls, is mislabelled anti trust controversy. Not really a controversy though is it when a court elected by over two hundred million people issues a decision, it'a court ruling, like it or not there's no controversy too that. Otherwise we should renaim the ted bundy trial, to the tend bundy controversy, since any court ruling merits this label. Since there's a section on anti trust laws and vista, it's worth noting the recent news that microsoft are going to be paying a hefty daily fine for completely ignoring the court's injuction. And this does have bearing on vista. You can't quote the m.s. pr saying we don't know what they want us to do, it's all questions, or whatever else he mentioned, without an adjunct sentence, of the head official regulating the anti trust actions quoting him too saying that our injuctions are crystal clear yet ms has ignored them for over two years now. But of course this has no bearing if this article is supposed to be a showcase for vista. So like i said, if some fuckers had gone into the trouble of actually discussing any of that instead of reverted every single edit in a hitleric fashion, things would be different. But for now this stategy of being a hawk on an article I wish to keep in a certain way, and being completely uncivil and rude about it, merits from my part a roayl, fuck y's all, take your mouths off of gate's balls and then we can talk. " +(1)I am not going to beat around the bush my expected outcome of this discussion is (a)You withdraw the block, by applying say a small duration block (b)you express regret. (2)I could do this formally, I won't as long as (a)My expected outcome is met or (b)You demonstrate and I am convinced that the block was good. Please I hope to sort this out between the two of us, it would save the community a lot of bother and time, so I request you to give this a try. I am not going to just discuss why but how, (a)I used the word ex-parte to convey precisely what you have done and not as a legal term wp:NOTLAW doesnot apply (b) Please read this Blocking is a serious matter. Administrators should be exceedingly careful when blocking. Blocks should be made only if other means are not likely to be effective; prior discussion or warnings should generally precede all blocks... (c)When I was blocked I was logged out, my more or less parting words to the editor whom I have have allegedly attacked personally were if you think I am a pain in your neck, I won't let my shadow fall on you, I am wasting your time because you came across as reasonable to me, so neither was I on a rampage nor was I sitting on anyone's shoulders and pulling his hair. (I won't let my shadow fall on you means I will stop interacting with you) Neither does my editing seem to have been like I was flexing a sledge hammer in a china shop, before I logged out I made major changes to the Shudra page, , Shudra is the term that was ruffling a lot of feathers, yet the present version have only one difference (barring links), and that is a vandal like removal of cited content. Take your own time, I'll get back in a week's time. Please add a talk back on my talk page, you see I am taking a wikibreak. +Please thanks for your lovely commeny on Bay Currentsknow that it is a FREE newspaper and it'a nearly impossible for it to go out of business +" Unspecified source for Image:Ruff1.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Ruff1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Man " +Yes I have done I would now be grateful if you could email it through to me. +" Just so there's no confusion, the troll, and I emphasize that, above is user Melbourne Star: The user who continued to revert my edit on the Judge Judy article on basis of ""original research"" despite my telling him multiple times, it was information provided in a New York Post source which I placed in the article.173.0.254.229 " +British trafficker or victim? I tend towards the view that they mean the first conviction for trafficking British girls. But it is certainly far from clear. +The Aiken page went through several months of editing and mediation before consensus was reached on the current version. The current version indeed mentions the tabloid stories, even if they are not true. If you would like to work to reach consensus on this page - we can certainly have that conversation. +Deolalikar's proof is correct. +Hulk (comics)== We need your help. The persistent anon IP who keeps reinserting fancruft edits that a consensus of editors has been removing. I don't want to risk an edit war, so I'm asking other recent article editors to come take a look at weigh in. Thanks. == +This should certainly be mentioned because it is yet further evidence that Brown is autistic. ( ) +" Neither ""Rynek"" nor ""Ring"" are trivially predictable from ""Market Square"". ""Market Square"" in fact is a description, but ""Rynek/Ring"" are proper names and, as names, of considerable interest in terms of cultural geography. ☼ " +Vandalism not properly reverted Hi there. One of your actions is mentioned at Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows#Vandalism not properly reverted. I'm not sure how aware you are of how to spot that sort of vandalism, so I've left this note to everyone who failed to spot it. Would you be able to comment over there if you have time? Thanks. +Ok, what about him abusing the rollback feature? Is that where I report that? 84.16.227.242 +Cleanup (2006.03.11) The section Labour utilization: shortening of the work day should either be removed or fit in to the article in some way. I am unfamiliar with the specifics of the formula given, so I cannot verify it, but I do know that the shortening of the work week to four, four-hour days is a central part of the Technocratic philosophy. The paragraph should be verified and expanded. Right now I'm leaning towards removing it. +My contributions stand on their own, and you can check out my user page to see. Yes, I'm proud of my photos. Regardless, there was a vanity photo with an advertising-oriented caption that is found on three articles. I removed the photo from one article, and you told me not to remove a photo (see WP:OWN) from a page, as if it is permanent. There was no personal attack (that policy is too often thrown around just when someone doesn't like what was said). I told you to follow your own advice, which you didn't. And my WP name is no more vanity than it is for you to sign your edits. It's not COI. You can bring it up with any number of admins and they'll tell you you're wrong. +You should remove the songs but I don't think theirs anything wrong with the Bit Torrent link, since it was never commercial released it woulden't matter. +Rebecca Cummings article You have previously helped me with the Rebbeca Cummings article. Since you are an Administrator I would like your unbiased input on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cummings and Image:Rebecca_Cummings.jpg that has been put up for deletion. Along with the discussion on the deletion page you can find information and discussions on this at Talk:Rebecca Cummings and Image_talk:Rebecca_Cummings.jpg. I feel like this is an unfair attack because she fits the notability criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors). This is listed in her article and restated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cummings. The reason I feel like this is an unfair attack by and now 4 days later user:Chowbok lists the article for deletion. Thanks for your input! +Michael Collins (Irish leader) +" More on Spore Thanks, I agree that has been kind of asinine (read: an ass) about the whole deal. I've posted a new comment regarding the matter of whether there really is a consensus or not. (talk|Contribs) " +I'm on vacation at the shore ... all was calm when I went to dinner ... and then, well, you see the result. I'll probably be at dinner when something goes down with Hamels. For right now, I'm going to play back the Blue Jay game and see how they won tonight. +" In that case your means of simply reverting the whole thing is simply a bad edit, instead of making corrections where I may have gone wrong, you instead revert the whole thing, despite the improvements, that's just lazy editing. If you want to discuss the changes I have made further, then discuss it on the talk page. |}} " +Those lolicon images are not child pornography and are not illegal in the United States. They are not a direct admission of having comitted any crime and do not provide probable cause. Wikimedia isn't going to get handed a warrant for that. LS is child pornography, is illegal everywhere, and hinting that one downloads it is enough for probable cause. k And I have never intentionally removed a comment from anywhere but my own talk page, except for at Talk:LS Studio now for legal reasons. +content discussions or formulation +Welcome! Hello, 64.134.138.80, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Teufel Nursery does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on User talk:Teddermy talk page. Again, welcome! +Thanks so much, !! +How have I harmed those pages? You are wasting my time. It must be true that most wikipedians have no girlfriends. +p.s. Good work, the article reads much better now. +" Suntem o forta! By the way just look at the [] you might discover something really nice about the ""all-powerful entity made of pure energy"" namely Mark Williamson also known as Node. Tot inainte! talk & contribs" +FYI chooyoo? you can sharpen my pencil with your mouth! +":ONE diplomat! WOW! Look up ""semantics"" & ""sophistry"" " +Completely false accusation. It is known that RSS spreads hatred against non-Hindu religions. Though I don't live in India I am of Indian origin. Our country was founded on the basis of secularism and freedom for all religions, not on some Hindutva ideals. The RSS is tearing this country's existence to pieces by attacking the non-Hindus. And the only reason it is able to do so is because the BJP government does not do anything against it since many of it's members come from that hatred-spewing RSS. And what is Modi doing about it? Nothing. That is because he too is a hate-monger like the RSS. He is a dog! And he should be treated like a dog! +I've played around with the lead, but to may need to be tightened. +" No problem, Ben wren, and you're doing fine. I've responded on the Ibox's talk page and wish I could be of more help. Another suggestion might be to ask about this on the project talk page (as shown at the top of the Ibox talk page), and be sure to link to the Ibox talk page like you did above. To link to the actual section of our discussion you would use: [[Template talk:Infobox song#Template-protected edit request on 21 August 2014|(your text here)]] That way, you will be able to talk with people who are also knowledgable about all this. One more thing – it may save you time in the future, when you think another editor might miss your talk-page post, you can ""ping"" them by just using a link to their user page in your post. That enables the notifications system. Best of good fortune to you, Ben wren! –   " +" Promotional writing and non-free content The tone of this article is not factual and neutral, but comes across as a promotional brochure aimed at people who belong to to Lee's particular denomination or doctrine of Christianity. Cases in point: ""Lee knows that Christians lives are to be holy and should be empowered by the Holy Spirit"", ""Rev. Dr. Lee movingly testified to messages"", ""...the fiery and explosive work of the Holy Spirit..."", ""Blind eyes were opened to see and ears that could not hear came to hear"" - those are a very few examples of utterly inappropriate and unencyclopedic phrases that abound in this text. Add to this the fact that this article seems to make the claim that Lee can actually perform miracles of healing, in direct contravention of Wikipedia policies. In addition, criticism and counter arguments have been removed or whitewashed, sometimes to the point of saying the exact opposite of what the sources state. The article needs a lot of work by people who are not affiliated with Lee's organisation. At the moment, there are many editors who work only on articles connected to Lee and his work, and it seems probable that there is a strong conflict of interest here. Another important issue is to do with non-free content. Bits of the promotional blurbs of Lee's books, and text taken straight from press releases, have been pasted into the article. It's difficult to find all the individual instances, because they crop up everywhere, and that's a very big problem. '''' contributions talk " +MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YOU CAN'T STOP MY VANDALISM MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH +WikiCohen = Kemi Olunloyo. There is a definite conflict of interest here. If this article is not going to be deleted, at least keep the part about her getting arrested and deported for being a bogus refugee and her charges in Georgia, USA. Thank you. +" Scientific evidences stating Meucci's priority on Bell 1) Anti-sidetone circuit Meucci began investigating topics related with the telephone ""system"" in 1858, as shown by a drawing of the same year, reproduced below http://www.chezbasilio.it/immagini/corradi_drw.gif. This drawing formed the basis for Meucci's caveat of 1871, but, as Meucci's lawyer did not file it with the caveat, it was later notarized by Meucci himself in his affidavit of 9 October 1885.The drawing shows a two-way, simultaneous, telephone conversation, with a complete separation between the two directions of transmission (indicated by arrows). This contrivance is aimed to counteract the so-called ""side-tone"" effect, that is, the hearing of the echo of the speaker's own voice (as well as any background noise) in his own receiver. This layout is known today as a ""four-wire circuit"". With it, Meucci anticipated any other inventor, as proved by the following: No mention of side-tone effects, nor measures to counteract it, are found in Bell's patents, nor in Gray's caveat, both of 1876. In the first Bell's subscriber lines, the four (initially, two) instruments were simply put in series on the same line. The first anti-sidetone (AST) circuits were introduced by the Bell people in the 1900s, particularly by George A. Campbell, with his nine patents of 1918, many decades after Meucci's solution was shown in this drawing, and over thirty years after the same drawing was notarized. 2) Inductive loading The drawing reproduced above http://www.chezbasilio.it/immagini/lemmi_drw.gif is taken from a note jotted down by Meucci in his Laboratory notebook on 27 September 1870, and reported in an affidavit by M. Lemmi of 28 September 1885, containing the English translation of said notebook (see also my paper on ""Antenna""). It can be seen that diagrams ""No. 2"" and ""No. 3"" differ from ""No. 1"" in the insertion midway along the long-distance line of an inductor (with either a horseshoe or bar iron core). In diagram ""No. 4,"" the inductor is split into two parts, inserted at both ends of the line. In his notes, Meucci pointed out that, in this way, he could get rid of the battery, and that, by splitting the inductor, he obtained better results. This technique is known today as the ""inductive loading"" of long distance telephone lines, allowing to increase the distance and/or the quality of speech. The proof that Meucci came first, can be drawn from the following events, occurred many years after Meucci's discovery (or its notarization): In June-July, 1887, Oliver Heaviside and Alfred Vaschy predicted, on the basis of mathematical calculations, that telephone signals could be transmitted without distortion by increasing the line's self-induction. On 19 June 1900, M. I. Pupin obtained the first two patents for said technique. The Bell Telephone Co. acquired both patents and, later on, applied them in its lines 3)Means to counteract the skin effect Because of the increased bandwidth of the telephone with respect to the telegraph, telephone lines were subjected to increased attenuation, due to the so-called skin effect. In two notes of 1862 in his Laboratory notebook (notarized in Lemmi's affidavit of 1885), Meucci suggested to treat the surface of the (copper) conductor in various ways (basically with graphite) to increase its surface conductivity. Moreover, in his caveat of 1871, Meucci stated: “I believe it preferable to have the wire of larger area than that ordinarily employed in the electric telegraph.” Another note in his notebook, dated 17 August 1870, reads: “To be adopted, for having long distance, bundles of copper wire insulated with cotton or any other kind of wrapper; by this means I have obtained a distance of about one mile.” For this ""bundle"" of copper wires Meucci filed a US patent application ""Wire for Electrical Purposes"" on 2 July 1880. That Meucci was first in said techniques, is proven by the following facts: Skin effect in telephone lines was neglected by all inventors till 1880, when it began to be investigated by David E. Hughes and Oliver Heaviside. Following their studies and the development of ""hard drawn"" copper, the Bell Telephone Co. decided to use copper in place of steel, beginning from the Boston-New York line, which was inaugurated on 27 March 1884. 4) Call signaling Meucci adopted a telegraphic call signaling, simply effected by a Morse key, attached to each end of the line, momentarily short-circuiting the local transmitter. In this way, strong pulses of current were sent along the line, and the distant receiver would emit intermittent ticks, much louder than the ordinary speech. In his caveat of 1871, Meucci gave a detailed description of his call signaling, consistent w +Woops, I checked some words with my Norsk-Engelsk/Engelsk-Norsk dictionary, but I missed that sentence. Thanks. review GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose quality: B. MoS compliance: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. References to sources: B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage? A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail: Congratulations on the article, I'm awarding GA-status. +?? So they can essentially look at the situation with an unbiased view?? Thank you (Do not misunderstand me-I am not implying anything) Kind +Brendan Schaub My edit on the Schaub page was not vandalism it is the weigh in result from his last fight. 100.40.27.236 +Merge? Do Not Merge. Separate episodes deserve separate articles. +300 f*ing years of mixing is MORE than enough to disqualify someone as part of a certain ethnic group. +" ==I've added a ""multiple IP address"" template to the top of this page. I've seen something similar posted on other pages for users with similar problems. I hope this helps you two, and others who monitor the article edits. Regards, Mrs. Dawn Booher " +Early Career; Devise of Succession I was puzzled to read that Cecil was responsible for this illegal document, as I happen to be reading a biography of Cecil that has Northumberland writing it and is quite specific. So I rewrote most of this paragraph, citing my source. I hope that, if there is more than one credible account of this incident, as I've found to be the case for other aspects of the reign, they'll be added. This perspective illumunates the nature of Cecil's courage (scroll down). He had principles, but would retreat from them under duress, either in the interest of the state or to preserve himself. +Wow, this article is a mess. Shouldn't the info without citations be removed? It's amazing how many articles on wikipedia are written so poorly. +You mean the former extremely racist and biased introduction meant to degrade Islam from the viewpoint of members of the KKK. The article now is neutral and very well balanced. +hello i am new and your robot took away the information i added to the superman 64 article i think this may have been because it was all big letters (upper) and i wont do it anymore thanks ) +Yep, he be the mouthpiece, but his law still stands. Oh, that was friggin' bad. +"__NOEDITSECTION____NONEWSECTIONLINK__ Narayana Guru and Atheism I disagree with the text in this section. Associating Narayana Guru with atheism clearly shows the lack of knowledge of the originating author on the Guru's philosophical and metaphysical works and perspective and reasoning of the Universe. Proclaimed atheists being associated with an individual in social reform initiatives does not by itself make the individual an atheist. Also there is a clear distinction between rationalists and atheists. This section needs to be edited. Aaroamal 5 Feb 2005 Narayana Guru and Sahodran Ayyappan Narayana Guru had disagreed with Sahodaran Ayyappan when the latter tried to corrupt Guru's teachings with Atheism.In fact Ayyappan requested Guru's permission to modify the slogan 'Oru Jati , Oru Matham, Oru Daivam Manushyanu' as 'Jati Venda, Matham Venda, Daivam Venda'. However, Guru ridiculed him by asking "" If Ayyappan wants to collect Rs.1 from each person to set up a library, you will ask ' Give One Rupee,Give One Rupee,Give One Rupee'. Does that mean ' No Rupee,No Rupee,No Rupee "" ? This 'Sahodaran' kept quiet at that time.However, he renewed his Atheist activities after the samadhi of Guru, thereby corrupting Guru's ideology. Vested interests fully exploited this confusion to corrupt Guru's teachings by projecting this 'Sahodaran' even above Guru. Krishnan 06-Feb-2005 Clarification on Atheism No where in the article did I say that Naryanaguru was an atheist. What I wrote was “his attitude towards the existence of a personal god is considered quite ambivalent” and that many of his followers had considered him an atheist. Can somebody point out which sentence of the article gives such an impression that he was an atheist? It goes to the credit of Sri Narayanaguru that in spite of being a theist, he openly accepted even atheists as his core desciples. The importance of this can be guaged only if one consideres the period in which he lived. One also has to be clear about the kind of thiesm Narayana Guru adovocated. It definitely was not the one associated with the brahaminical/casteist Hiduism. I find it bit difficult to comprehend why this section on atheism and atheist followers of Narayanaguru should be edited out. A discussion/debate on the philosophy of Narayanaguru is thoroughly understandable but I find it puzzling that the followers of Narayanaguru are getting overly agitated on hearing the word atheism. Pity indeed! And I agree with Aaroamal that there is a distintion between rationalist and atheist. That is precisely why I assert in my user page of wikipedia that I am both an atheist and rationalist. 09:02, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) Clarification on Atheism Manoj, True, you did not explicitly write that Narayana Guru was an atheist. However, you implicitly structured a (misinformed and incomplete) statement as follows: “When Sahodaran Ayyappan modified Narayana Guru's famous catchphrase, Oru Jati, Oru Matham, Oru Daivam Manushyanu (One Caste, One Religion, One God for Humanbeing) and re-written it as Jati Venda, Matham Venda, Daivam Venda Manushyanu…the latter did not protest”. Obviously by stating that “…the latter did not protest”, here you are clearly implying that Narayana Guru accepted Sahodaran Ayyappan’s atheistic view as amendment to the famous catchphrase. I am sorry to say that this is absolutely false! Everybody appreciates that Narayana Guru was tolerant of atheists because he respected an individual’s fundamental right and freedom to belief, or disbelief, in the exitence of God. That tolerant attitude however should not be misinterpreted to imply otherwise. As Krishnan has already pointed out, Narayana Guru’s reaction to Sahodaran Ayyappan’s revised version of the slogan was a clear protest, so it is not true to say …”the latter did not protest”. Please could you explain what you mean by saying, “his attitude towards the existence of a personal god is considered quite ambivalent”; are you referring to any of Narayana Guru’s writings, if so which one? Which serious scholar of Narayana Guru has so commented? Also, in what context is that statement being included under the heading “Narayana Guru and Atheism”. Futher you state that “M +Can someone help me with this? +" Thank you for your kind words and the barnstar! I'm glad to hear you've got it working and that we got there in the end!!! talk " +With Regards to Your Recent Thoughtful Epistle... Go get fucked and maybe you will not be so goddamned gay. Otherwise, go eat a bag of hell and drop dead. +Richard, we now do know officially that Harry Newcombe died last March 18th, Stephen Butcher died sometime last year and John Newman presumably sometime this year, but after the death of Alice Baker Gladys Powers (living in Canada) was discovered along with another British female veteran survivor, who remained anonymous apparently, that is until now. Extremely sexy +No This is not vandalism ) +Basically the the usage of greater germany makes about as much sense as using british isles because as greater germany, or more appropriately the 3rd Reich, is out of date by 60 years the term british isles is also outdated. I suppose you would still use the term wireless instead of radio +History of the petroleum industry in Canada (frontier exploration ande development) I have just been marvelling at the work you did on this article, especially in your conversions from metric to US units. Is there a list somewhere of the conversion formulas that I can use as a reference? Thanks. +isnt this interesting thhink of this......... +I basically want someone of brown appearance first in the infobox and put at least 2 more brown looking people in the article like Alberto Gonzales and Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony. I have no problem putting Cameron Diaz in there, but the pictures are all tilted to white people. If you put Salma Hayek or anyone of brown looking appearance in front of the template, you can revert it back as long as a brown person is first picture in the template by removing one white person (there were 2 white person). You can put Pacheko in there, but remove another white person. My concern is pure racial imbalance of this article, and you can change the article however you want it as long as we have single new brown person picture first in the template. I'm glad we are getting somewhere and this will be resolved. 24.9.96.166 +All the television reports mentioned that they did not wear seatbelts. If it's not in the print news coverage, I'd be rather surprised. Did you check nj.com? +Titanic Material added to article The content of your sandbox page outlining additional factors involved in the sinking of RMS Titanic was well written, and outshone much of the material on Wikipedia's main article. I intend to do some work on the page in the near future (I added something about the sea trials), but in the mean time have transferred some of the material from the sandbox page into the main article, in the hope that there it will receive more frequent amendation. Since the sandbox appears to have been unmodified since 2007, I thought this a sensible thing to do. Given the p +" Ebony Anpu (Charles Reese) It's high time Ebony Anpu got his own Wiki page. I have created a very preliminary Wiki page. Everyone who knew him or who is familiar with his work in the OTO or Hawk and Jackal is encouraged to contribute. I also added refs to him in Ordo Templi Orientis and Grady McMurtry. ""93,23,BB. Hut, Hike!"" - Ebony Anpu. <3 " +"The Traditional Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, made of priests and layfolk, recommend Fish Eaters: http://www.latin-mass-society.org/links.htm (and the British SSPX linked to it at the old domain). Contrary to the ""radical"" nonsense being hurled at it, the very neo-con CatholicCulture.org (formerly PetersNet.net) gives it a ""cautious"" rather than their ""danger"" label http://www.catholicculture.org/sites/site_view.cfm?recnum=1915 Jacob Michael of ""Lumen Gentleman"" calls it ""One of the best Traditional Catholic resource sites on the Internet, period. Tons of information and research on Traditional Catholic teachings, customs, habits, prayers, and anything else you could possibly imagine."" http://lumengentleman.com/index.asp Tradition In Action links to it: http://www.traditioninaction.org/links.htm Fr. Jim Tucker of ""Dappled Things"" has linked to it a number of times, Religious Tolerance.org links to it (http://www.religioustolerance.org/rcc.htm), New York University's ""The Revealer"" links to it and calls it ""an excellent introduction to the ""traditionalist"" Catholic movement"" (http://www.therevealer.org/archives/links_000260.php), Charles A. Coulombe likes Fish Eaters, Amy Wellborn has linked to it and even financially supported it, parishes have linked to it, Seattle Catholic has linked to it what are you wanting? A papal bull? " +My assumption is that +FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU ASSHOLES, THIS IS BULLSHIT!! +but this is how it should be, worth no mention at all... I needed hours to find the solution for my MicroRNA template. I have looked at the deldiscs on the more medical subjects and indeed, on 10 topics, there is not one original contributor defending his stuff, and i even get into metaphors; no real-world spamer takes this effort. +Look, dude, the term does not exist. It just doesn't. Like I typed in the revision history thing, you cannot always go on Google searches. Most those hits were blogs. Sometimes, you have to go by real world concepts and cultures. From what I understand, blacks who are from Italy don't call themselves that. We cannot go crazy and make up names. If there is some cultural awakening or whatever like with African American back in the 1980s, then we can add it. Until then, it's all hearsay. +NEJM 2015 http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcpc1501310 Case 22-2015 — A 20-Year-Old Man with Sore Throat, Fever, Myalgias, and a Pericardial Effusion Daniel P. Hunt, M.D., Jonathan A. Scheske, M.D., David M. Dudzinski, M.D., and Sheila L. Arvikar, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:263-271 July 16, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcpc1501310 http://blogs.nejm.org/now/index.php/a-man-with-sore-throat-and-myalgias/2015/07/17/ A Man with Sore Throat and Myalgias Posted by Carla Rothaus Now@NEJM. July 17, 2015 +A tag has been placed on Terry wright, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sax456 +" Afghan Districts Is there a local name for the districts? Like the provinces being called ""velayat""? Thanks! " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +March 2013 (UTC) Well it is clear that my position on what is proper to cover in this article does not fit with the vocal majority here. I maintain that the article, in its current form, reads like a sanitized Vatican press release. Even if all of the arguments I've presented here are seen to carry no weight, I fail to see how the wealth of reliable sources that I've sited have been so readily dismissed as irrelevant, giving not so much as a single mention within the body of the article. And aside from the one's I had highlighted, there were plenty of reliable sources reporting on the December VatiLeaks Dossier, with that document's connection to the resignation decision. I find it shocking to see so many editors here to not want a single mention of any of that. So the decision for now is to continue presenting an article on Benedict's resignation as though there was absolutely no connection to any of the scandals, and to pretend that all of the reliable sources that do point to such connections don't exist. Very curious. 15:20, 7 +" Strange effect in edit summary - left-hand side of diffs See the edit summary on the left-hand side of it throws Harv error: link from #CITEREF_and_havnb_and_CITEREF_and_CS1 doesn't point to any citation. However, if you follow the link, the same edit summary is shown on the right-hand side, but without the red error message. " +Possible name after move If someone is considering moving this page to a new name, please consider the title Vitolo is already taken. Attentively 84.90.219.128 +the only source I could find for more details is at Toho Kingdom, but issues with RS may appear using it. I watched the full cut years ago and I get the general drift. The plot section is crap though. +" geroge goerge lol lol ""laugh ouy loud""" +Peter Piper Picked A Peck Of Pickled Peppers +Hey Dickhead Please stop posting threats to my page which relate to edits which I did not do. +" In response to your feedback VERY WELL  " +" You are under the influence of a severe WP:COI attack. Remember a COI could be spotted not only by defending but also by attacking a particular project/idea (like you are doing here). You have erased (I think it was you even when that edition it is not signed) the independent links that support the inclusion of SERVA in this page. You have erased links to articles written by many different people from many different languages, you have erased the kind of link you couldn't provide for supporting the projects that you are SPONSORING here. My proposed changes are based in facts that you cannot take (and dare to erase); You are PROMOTING projects here; you do not provide independent sources, then I do not have to convince you. You are definitely biased here. I want to report for erasing the research material I have included when supporting one of the projects ERASED by him in this page. 1) systematiclly refuses to provide the bases for supporting COBBLER inclusion. He does not have/know how to articulate the support for the mentioned project. I encourage talk to finally provide to the WP community the supporting material for the inclusion of this project here. He is the one that systematically forces the inclusion of this project; it has to be him who knows and proves to the community the value of the mentioned project. My guideline based argument for removing COBBLER is that that project it is not representative of the PXE state of art. I want to report as a biased editor whose behavior could be very well understood under the terms of WP:COI. 2) You cannot say ditto; the guideline based argument for removing EL TORITO was clearly stated before; you are definitely not WP:LISTENing here. EL TORITO has nothing to do with PXE. 3) Again a magnificent display of WP:COI; your COI. You are trying to twist things putting the blame on me but that will not change facts: There is no independent material available for supporting the inclusion of ERPXE. Peroid. Again it is YOU who scream COI here while supporting one of your projects. Bring the material and I'll shut up. If not it isn't me the one that has to shut up here. 4) your WP:COI is amazing; you cannot take defeat; and no matter what I write you want to promote the projects that you want while banning SERVA. If I bring links you erase the links, if I bring facts and arguments you call me ""dead horse"". You do not care about WP you just care about not bending your arm. You have no clue about PXE but you pretend to rule how the PXE page is written based on your guts feelings and personal taste. SERVA was included here for long time and it was you who take it down.I think you were just too far." +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  'Speaketh Marcel du Plessis I have put the text of the deleted article on for you to work on. Please carefully read [[ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel du Plessis|the AfD]] and make sure that you address all the issues there. The main concern was that this player wasn't notable, which on Wikipedia means that there were no citable sources or media references to him. Make sure you document with reliable media references and use the footnote/reference templates at WP:CITET. When you get the article polished up, drop me a note so that I can review it. It will then have to go through a deletion review, but if you've done your homework well, I'll sponsor it there, and it probably won't have a problem. 'Speaketh " +" Redundantly Duplicated Repetitions of the Same Things Over and Over, Repeatedly The article is rife with repetition. Just to give one example, the concept of introducing fictitious forces to help when working in a rotating frame is explained (rather repetitiously) in the first sections of the article. Then when we get to the section on Fictitious Forces (which doesn't even belong on this article) is starts out ""An alternative to dealing with a rotating frame of reference from the inertial standpoint is to make Newton's laws of motion valid in the rotating frame by artificially adding pseudo forces to be the cause of the above acceleration terms, and then working directly in the rotating frame."" Why must we keep saying this over and over and over....? " +" As an aside, despite ""consensus"" being reached, are you aware not a single person was able to provide a Wikipedia policy for why the text should remain? What's the point of Wiki policies when you can just get a group of people saying it should be in, without offering a single valid reason. Probably a bunch of church goers, to be fair. Have fun allowing Wikipedia to deteriorate with the ignoring of policies and the silencing of truths. " +P.S. Do You Have Know Any Elves I Can MASH ?? +If you are so flabbergasted, why don't you look up a search on Google yourself. You want a burden of proof, so get one for free! 14:39, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) +Reply to Osli That is none of your business. Unless you stop poisoning Srebrenica massacre article with moral relativism and already discredited Serbian sources, me and you cannot talk. When you stop your advertisements of discredited Serbian opinions, I will find time to speak to you again. Remember: Srebrenica article is not about Serbs or Serbian claims/politics - it's about 8,000+ victims of Genocide that was committed by Serb forces. Can you comprehed this statement? I am sure you can, but you don't want to. +Thanks. Thankyou for your information. I shall not add too many links now. Thankuyou for telling me I am new. +In popular culture Mossad is seen in many books, tv shows and movies. Just to name 2 right now, NCIS mentions Mossad alot and one of their agents is with Mossad. The upcoming moview, You dont mess with the Zohan main character is a Mossad. Im sure more people can name more. 72.138.216.89 +" ""In the case of sons of a duke or marquess, who by courtesy have ""Lord"" prefixed to their given and family name, the wife is known by the husband's given and family name with ""Lady"" prefixed, e.g. The Lady John Smith; the daughters of dukes, marquesses and earls are by courtesy Ladies; here that title is prefixed to the given and family name of the lady, e.g. The Lady Jane Smith, and this is preserved if the lady marries a commoner, e.g. Mr John and The Lady Jane Smith. The predicate 'The' should be used prior to ""Lady"" or ""Lord"" in all cases except after a divorce for women who do not hold the courtesy title of ""Lady"" in their own right, e.g. Heather, Lady McCartney or Jane, Lady Smith as the ex-wife of The Lord John Smith.""" +use once as appropriate. The current revision is good. It is not used in badges, it is not used down the side. It is sparingly used as a modifier for clarity in the text. +Article on Christian G. Fritz Hello. I noticed that you just created an article on Christian G. Fritz, and I thought that since you appear to be new here I should let you know that it does not currently meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. There is a specific guideline for determining the notability of academics that you should read before committing any more work to the article. If you decide that Professor Fritz does meet the criteria described there, you will have to provide properly formatted (I recommend using the {{cite}} template), independent and reliable sources to establish his notability. Let me know if you have any questions. – +[User:Ponyo]] we are sisters y'all are so crazy for blocking me i didn't do anything wrong you people want everything your way it makes no type of sense' +And this is the same issue as Kyiv/Kiev: guess which version has been set? +" Hey I noticed you were online from my watchlist, and was wondering if you could revert an edit for me. This user on Jumping Trains will not quit reverting my copyedit of the article, and re-adding unsourced and not well sourced content. — {talkcontribs  " +" Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ''''''Talk " +" Fair use rationale for Image:Robert Charles Browne.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Robert Charles Browne.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +|source = Origins of Schizophrenia''', published 2012 by Columbia University Press, and chapter 1 (page 25) says }} +" Agoura High School club One of the clubs, ""Asian Students Enticing Awareness,"" is misspelled on the Wikipedia entry as well as the AHS website. It should be ""Inticing"" instead of ""Enticing,"" thus forming the letters ""ASIA.""" +REDIRECT Talk:Black honey buzzard +}} {{WikiProject New York City +Including the endorsement itself I can understand, since it's of interest in the context of his post-presidential career. Presidential endorsements are influential on quite a high public level, and this is the first opportunity he's had post-office to endorse somebody not his son. The specifics of what it was that was so nice about what he said about McCain is not so relevant as its potential or intended influence - so it's a stretch on the rules on original research to imply significance by quoting it. +Dear god, I just want Brawl to come out so this pissing contest can stop. I'm looking forward to seeing this article in tip-top shape after it's unblocked, does anyone know how long this is for? +":::::BTW, I just moved Chometz to Chametz. ;-) (talk) " +" , please, just think about what you're saying here. Let's take this by the numbers: Firstly, quite frankly, I am dissappointed that you saw no reason to act in the face of the diffs and information I posted at User talk:Black Kite . Your suggestion that HighKing should ""step back from this type of edit"" is, quite frankly, going to be ignored, again, as his edits on The Automobile Association showed. His admission that he has a problem sounds depressingly familiar. After 5 years of being unable to contain this problem himself, and in the face of overwhelming evidence yet again in this case that it still exists, then coming as it did off the back of yet more of the usual erroneous defences, duplicitous denials and improper deflections, is surely wholly unsatisfactory. 's close was both abusive and counter-productive. He closed a perfectly valid complaint, based on completely irrelevant reasons, namely my 'status' (further below, and on his talk page). If I had not pressed him about it on his talk page, he wouldn't have even bothered to notify you about it, and you would never have even heard about 's actions at The Automobile Association. Your charge of harassment is frankly ridiculous - all I have done with this account is make factual statements about HighKing's current and past behaviour, which you yourself have just repeated today, is still problematic. I am obviously not the IP user he was edit warring with, I never engaged with HighKing, I never reverted HighKing, I never threatened or personally attacked HighKing. All I did was comment on the situation in a factual manner, in the hope other admins would take action in your absence. If me making this sort of contribution spoils HighKing's enjoyment of Wikipedia, who the hell cares, quite frankly? It's simply not harassment. If HighKing was to turn into a model editor tomorrow, then he'd never hear me talking about him ever again. That's not harassment, it's practically the job description of a Wikipedia admin! Your block for evading scrutiny - it is entirely pointless. Enforcement of WP:SOCK long ago stopped being about what's good for Wikipedia in many instances, as this block shows. Whatever my history, whether this is a legitimate or illegitimate alternate account, whether I'm blocked or banned, whatever, there isn't a single thing that I could possibly be hiding that would make the edits this account performed look any less valid to an outside observer. Nothing that might be or could be revealed about me, would change their meaning or relevance, and it certainly wouldn't make them any (more) true. The idea that only established can be implicitly trusted to tell the truth on Wikipedia strikes me as extremely dangerous, a view no admin should be seen within a hundred miles of holding, let alone repeating. Taking 3 & 4 together, there was absolutely no preventative purpose to this block, and so, it it is entirely without grounds in basic policy. And on the issue of basic points of policy with regard both the socking and harassment charges - you don't even know for sure if this is an illegitimate sock. You don't know if I have a regular account, or if I'm blocked or banned. You're just guessing. For all you know, I might be using an undeclared alternate account because I myself might have previously been the victim of harassment from HighKing, and so I would have a perfectly legitimate reason to hide what my 'regular account' is when commenting on him in future. And given the fact that, as this block shows, being critical of HighKing is seemingly enough to get someone tarred with a charge of conducting a ""long term campaign of harassment"" without any actual evidence whatsoever, then it would be entirely understanable if an editor in good standing would not want to expose their main account to that sort of smear, as the price of simply commenting on HighKing. To expand on the socking issue - rather than being an ""inappropriate"" use of a sock, when it comes to HighKing, I think its self evident given his past, using a sock when commenting on his behaviour at a venue like ANI is highly appropriate, as it removes his ability to do what he has often done in those situations, namely trying to deflect attention from his own behaviour by talking about what the people reporting him have done, whether it is even relevant or not, and indeed, whether it is even true or not (his habit for example of makin +Removing the (is that what it is now?) tag is sufficient. +, and Mileena Hayes the model +" Only admins can reinstate things. I'm not one. I wish I could look at the article in question and give you a more specific answer, but an administrator would have that ability. My guess is that it had a lot of ""peacock"" terms which might have seemed advertisement-y. You can rewrite the article though (but if you don't include a bibliography/reference list it might be deleted again) without promotional language. " +I did not add superior...really i didn't...be kind and check before you accuse me of this....i added reverend because it's what he was , his job not style...and it was according to the site...but now i see someone else change it and added superior and a new site lycnked...so please talk to that person not me. +primeval creatures page Its been nominated for deletion and we need votes in order to save it. +So? The infobox already states that. +Stop being a shithead, or I will rip off your head and piss down your esophagus, mother fucker. We Came In? +It's not even on television yet. +Gary Weiss I appreciate your constructive criticism of my contributions to the Gary Weiss article. I have done as you suggested and added additional citations of the claims made therein. Of course the record is pretty clear on the subject of the libel claim made by Robertson against Weiss and Business Week, so source citations were not difficult to find. Again, thanks for helping me build a better contribution. On the topic of Weiss' blog and posting habits, I do disagree with your characterizing them as attacks, but will drop that point for now as we seem to have reached a consensus on the Legal Precedents section. Thanks! +Post an exact quote from the Telemundo article that states that Wisin y Yandel were angered, and that they stood up from their chairs out of anger. The Ivy Queen quote is verbatim, but its used to support the assumption that she was personally angry at Calle 13 because they won but are not considered reggaeton artists (and that's not anywhere in the article). The only thing that can be proved with those references is that she made a comment about them winning too many awards, there's nothing to stop someone else from posting that she was overjoyed that they won and was jokingly pointing out that they won so many. Reorgnization is fine, but you're putting a serious spin on your additions without proper referencing, it calls your motives into question. +??? REALLY? dynamic IP? read much? +Exactly. Simply citing church doctrine without providing proof that it has been applied specifically to Gregerson is not sufficient for supporting the claim that this vile Mormon (or ex-Mormon, whatever the case may be) criminal was excommunicated. +FYI, changed Kelly Richard from Miracmichi Centre, to Miramichi Bay Du Vin where she is running. Her real name is also Kelly Clancy King, changed that too. +That sounds reasonable. +Public apology I hereby make a public apology to User:Docku for this comment. I sincerely regret the genuine hurt and pain it caused to you, and I shall do my best to refrain from making similar comments in future +" I mean, just check this one out for real: ""* Narconon: same reason (or else might as well list the other views on Narconon);"". Comparing an international drug rehab program with some dinky personal and outdated website set up by Dave ""NoClue"" Touretzky, who does not even dare to put his name on the site? Also that they are some kind of buddies doesn't make it more ok. Back to square one then. " +The reason is that you are too lazy to clear all the crap in english Wiki. +birth place YC was not born in Jonesboro Georgia +Aaron Jacobs Aaron Jacobs should not be deleted. There is plenty of noteworthy and relevant information on the page. He is the founder of a company, has many political achievements, and has many close ties that are very relevant. +"|decline=You were clearly edit warring, see WP:EW. Believing that you are in the right, and that someone else is wrong, does not allow you an exemption from Wikipedia's behavioral policies. 32 " +Thanks for this, I can see from these links that renaming and moving will not be best after all. I'll make a small change to Publius Petronius and hope that and the disambiguous page will clarify for everyone. +" BAD FAITH PART II I don't take kindly to implied threats like ""PLEASE LEAVE"" link title... you have not the cause or reason to say such and it could be construed that you are the ""Owner"" which would violated WP:OWN as well as WP:PA. I say to you, Propol, you leave... " +How is it vandalism? I left you a friendly message deal with it. +"Note: do not reply quoting ""Wikipedia policies"" or anything similar because I will simply label you a pathetic bureaucrat and question the point of your life if you do so. " +In Response Dear “Lessheard vanU” and to Wikipedia including all editors and administrators & Mr. Wales: This is a very serious issue. We contributing writers have attempted to follow wikipedia written polices in contributing and adding to an existing article or creating one. Yet there are double standards beings upheld by wikipedia’s own editors and administrators. As with Blackpearl14, who clearly believes that wikipedias polices don’t apply to her, and with other editors who uphold double standards. Then when challenged to the double standards, including Blackpearl14's violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and reckless authoritarian rule and control, other wikipedia editors and administrators then support each other when one of them continues to violate wikipedia’s own written polices. “Lessheard vanU” had then wrongly and deliberately calls the contributing people who writes back and flags the issue at hand a “harassing the editor”, outright agreeing with Blackpearl14. Then in addition to IP address being blocked, all “talk & discussion” are deleted leaving only one sided bias and reckless claims against the contributing writers. Even though wrongly deleted by wikipedia editors & administrators, all of this has been recorded, including that Blackpearl14 having repeatedly writing in both correspondence and her bio page (copies have been secure) that the articles belong to her and they will continue to be own and controlled by her. These statements alone proves that she is in violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and purpose. Yet you have ignored that. As previously written in discussion, per wikipedia’s own written polices, but immediately deleted by Blackpearl14 and then sanctioned by “Lessheard vanU”, Blackpearll4 - calls herself evidently Mrs. Johnny Depp and Pirate lord-ess and such. She celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean for wikipedia. Why would someone devote so much time to 24/7 check the site and on these pages, and then recklessly calls anyone who doesn’t follow her bias views vandals, attackers and such. Has her judgement become impaired? Her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean is very clear. That is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedia’s own written polices. Sorry, but if one purchases products, such as Pirates of the Caribbean posters, toys and Walt Disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia / wikinews articles, doesn’t make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest. As recorded, Blackpearl14's pages regarding this issue are one sided, not neutral, are bias, in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean. Yes, Pirates of the Caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral, they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the Walt Disney Company. Following wikipedia’s own written “neutral” policy, entire articles would have to be deleted. Yet Blackpearl14 continues to violate Wikipedia polices and purpose. Then with IP’s being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things, if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to Pirates of the Caribbean following wikipedia’s own written polices, editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason, to delete those articles and ban the IP user. They use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts. It’s a total lock out by the editors and administrators, abusing their trust tools, acting like a private monarchy. To date, Blackpearl14's has proven she has ultimate control, has repeatedly stated that is her purpose, and had even sought to have the articles locked. Then you “Lessheard vanU” wrote that you don’t want to lock these articles, stating it goes against company policy, but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as “vandals” and “harassing the editors” etc... Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and “Chris Mann”. We have documented that they say one thing, yet practice another. We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers. We contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and admin +" Neutrality Is that ugly neutrality tag still necessary or can it be removed? talk " +" A tag has been placed on WAM Princess, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +I've tried to reword and reduce this bit +" If you have a reliable source that talks explicitly about ""blowback"" using that word regarding the actions of OBL or after the killing of OBL, then it would be relevant. (Talkie-Talkie) " +"::::""Many""? Hardly! You seem to believe that if you believe your edits improve the article, then ipso facto the article is improved. However, your edits clearly have not improved the article and in fact have resulted in the article being downgraded from ""B"" to ""start"" class. So far, there are two editors besides myself who have reverted your edits: 1 and 2. Again, as for ""causing trouble,"" see WP:AGF. " +"==Your edit to AK-47== Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, as this is not Myspace, we do not use HTML. This is a Wiki, and we use wiki formatting. Please feel free to conduct tests in the sandbox. 15 " +Just Wanted to Let You Know == You're a loser.134.71.214.6 == +" It is often inappropriate because books and papers are included as well as links, so please leave them alone. Also, please revert your doubling up of the templates. (talk) " +This guy is following me everywhere and reverting me. That's clearly harassment. Wtf I'm supposed to do? +" Merely a stub This article makes no sense. IT should be removed or at least completely redone . For the first thing this article is a stub and should be labeled as such - it says hardly anything about the Targowica Confederation save for enumerating it's prominent members. The other problem is that Targowica was NOT an military organisation - it was a merely puppet of Catherine II of Russia, it haven't had any ""forces"" to speak of, the War in Defense of the Constitution was fought and won entirely by the Russian army. Given the way it is written here one may think that it was a polish civil war, when in fact it was a fight with an armed intervention of the Russians, trying to restore their protectorate over Poland." +Well there are positives to everything. At least if I am forced to do the time I can at least stand by my comments. Truth silenced is still truth, and sometimes it hurts. Next time I'll try to use lube. +The point of contention is whether my actions with regard to sarah_ewart were harassment, I have avoided editing her talk page as ordered to by [User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] and he nevertheless blocked me. +" The problem is that I think people have offered constructive criticism. I think Daniel made his point about the pictures very well and didn't deserve to be told to ""read the fucking article"". I also think it unfair to accuse anyone who comments of being a ""rabid MT apologist"". If I said something you disagreed with I expect I would be given the same label. I appreciate that you have tried to make compromises on the article, and this obviously shows as many people have said the page is better now than it was, but I do think the tendency for the talk page to descend into nothing but bickering and personal attacks will put off people who would otherwise have worked on it. I'm sorry if you found my assumptions unfair but from what I've seen you are not willing to assume to people are commenting in good faith; you seem to think everyone has an ulterior motive of wanting to force POV into the article, which in many cases (not all) is not the case in my opinion. Anyway, I'm staying out of it. . 03:13, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)" +Whoa there Take it easy. There is no need to leave Wikipedia because someone (me) called you a nigger. It's the Internet. Insults are commonplace. +" John Major Jenkins quote about Wikipedia ""... Wikipedia is a joke; it's a breeding ground for the vindictive and envious ... "" Verification available upon request." +CHECK YO SELF FOOL Dude you best check yo self! Or I will check yo self for you. Stop ruining the truth! +3RR on SummerSlam (2010)‎ Continued harassment will be reported. HAND; FYM. +REDIRECT Talk:Odrowąż coat of arms +" Another Ethnic cleaning by Chinese Goverment I suggested to catogerize Chinese goverment and its people into ""Terrorist countries"" section. Those are war criminals, ultra-nationalist communists. They killed thousands of Tibetians and now they want to kill all the Uyghurs in the country. Chinese supporters should be blocked from this site. 62.248.42.19 " +As has already been explained, Ben, you agreed to license your contributions under the GFDL. That was before I realised how Wikipedia operates. As far as I am concerned, the articles should be rewritten. +Ruy, let's meet for coffee. I promise not to bring any polonium. +" Maybe you could answer my question before undoing my reasonable action? ... talk " +" Edits to Twin article My recent edit to the Twin article does not at all constitute vandalism. I made a legitimate edit: one which improves the article by rewriting (or in this case, omitting) redundant phrases. Wikipedia's definition of vandalism is ""any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia."" I have not done any of this. I made a constructive edit and described my changes in the edit summary. 75.27.41.134 " +" Last Stopover Would Los Rodeos be considered the last stopover for the Pan Am and for the KLM. They technically ""stopped over"" there and were continuing to Las Palmas. Also, I corrected the departure and arrival information for the KLM because it was not going to Schiphol, it was going to Las Palmas." +This whole page is false, My uncle actually wrote this song and sold it for very little money to a record company.. +Ad hominem, mayhap?) Up yours! +No, That was Sango123. I called the other chick beautiful. Tee hee! I'm actually a very strong supporter of Wikipedia. I don't mean that in terms of how much I contribute as I simply cannot dedicate the time. But I contribute validly from time to time, updating information, removing non-neutral information, etc etc. It just amazes me how closely this thing is protected in order to keep valid research data available. Excellent resource. +thumb|Hey, why hang up your nose? thumb|right|Nectar flows and drips on your clothes... +"Did you manage to read that ""refutation""? I did - and it essentially says that Boas never actually meant to postulate primate of nurture over nature - it is by pure accident that all around misunderstood him in that way. So much for ""refutation"". " +"EvanS|EvanS]] (talk) 18:42, 1 August" +" I have to put this as sittign here cackling my head off. Are you peopel on leave from a psyche hospital? I just found the following post from prissy Dame Ewart on some other user's talk page. Its all very weird. This Gretaw is not me. It seems she also is offended by Dame Sara so good on her. Fancy this Sarah going to anothers talk page and speakign to them as though they are someone else. That is so wacko. Shows how you guys are. Very delusional. Its a delicious honour to be blocked from you feral ninnys. TY for the compliment. I just edit on Help.com but really, what a waste of time editing anywhere, especially when no one pays for the effort. Ensure Dame Sarah reads this below the obvious delusional it is. No one presumes to that extent unless the need some help. Why would I register an accoutn when I wont even sign posts, (too much IT nous for that whereas the rest of u dont it seems). ""User talk:Gretaw From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search 1.Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Longhair\talk 2.Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you assume good faith in dealing with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. Bidgee [edit] Gundagai Ms Gundagai, normally I would be thrilled to be the centre of so much attention (so far all your edits, except those to your userpage, have been devoted to me), but article talk pages are for discussing the article, not for making personal attacks on other users. If you wish to give me feedback, I would be most interested to read it. The appropriate place for such postings is my userpage, not article or project space. If you truly object to editors ""fiddling...and inteferring with some else's words,"" then you might want to consider whether Wikipedia is the right place for you. Every time you make an edit, you acknowledge acceptance that your edits may be edited any number of times by any number of people. At the bottom of each edit page is this statement: ""If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."" I strongly caution you about continuing to make personal attacks on other users. The community condemns personal attacks, and should you choose to continue making them, it will result in further and longer range blocks. It's very easy to avoid such blocks by simply commenting on article content instead of editors. I'm sure we can all work together constructively and productively if we refrain from making comments about other users. I am very pleased that you now have an account and I think this is a sign of good faith on your behalf. So thankyou for that. I hope we are able to get these issues resolved so you may be able to enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Sarah Ewart (Talk) """ +yea you just removed sourced material that contributes to the article. So sorry, I have posted numerous links to job cuts explicitly caused by Obamacare, not only the IBD list but 10 CEOS of companies with over 50,000 employees. They all explicitly cited higher taxes/costs associated with Obamacare, they didn't cite the academic bullshit being spewed forth here and elsewhere. Such a shame that real life doesn't jive with the total nonsense bullshit that is written on the wiki page. − and it was supposed to create healthcare jobs, yet − 2013 was the slowest year for health-care job growth since 1999. December was the first month on record that health care employment actually declined. − http://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-fascinating-nuggets-another-bewildering-150348488.html +Fair Use Image Aplogies to the Total War franchise (even though, having had over a £100 from me, they owe me an image or two). I wasn't aware of the rules until you gave me a heads up. I was tempted to use one of the images from Wikimedia to replace it, but, to be honest, I'm not that fond of user pages that are more about the user than how they will work within Wikipedia. I'd already removed most of the bio/fan material already. So, no worries. +" S'alright - that makes sense - didn't know that about the way twinkle works. It's been a busy morning for this article - speedy notice, notice removed, prodded, deprodded, three different editors adding references and nominated for a collaboration project - and it's only existed 65 minutes! ...wha? " +07:48, 6 June 2007(signature added by ) +When will the Billboard Music Awards will return? I'm curious because Flo Rida had a chance to win in 2008. +" Dear Mr. Jim Handerson, please read the 09:58 16 July 2012 fightingagainstlies edition of the article. You will understand that what I am mentioned. Oktay Sinanoğlu (born on August 2, 1934 in Bari, Italy) is a Turkish scientist specializing in theoretical chemistry and molecular biology. In his autobiographical book which titled ""The Turkish Einstein Oktay Sinanoglu Book""[1] he describes himself as: ""A person who was the world's youngest professor in the last 300 years,""[2] ""at the peak of the science in the U.S.A.,""[3] ""a man who reached the level to say, ""I'm God"" in science,""[4] ""the Lord of the U.S.A.,""[5] and ""The Turkish Einstein.""[6] Childhood and High School Years (1934-1953) Sinanoğlu was born on August 2, 1934 in Bari, Italy, where his father (Nüzhet Haşim Sinanoğlu) served as a consul general. In 1939 - at the beginning of World War II - the family returned to Turkey. He graduated high school in Turkey in the year 1953. This high school's name was ""Ankara Maarif College"" since 1951.[7] The courses in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology in this school had been given by English teachers in the English language since 1949.[8][9] Sinanoglu learned the English language very well in this high school. Serving American Military Intelligence at the age of 18 In his autobiographical book entitled ""Turkish Einstein Oktay Sinanoglu Book,"" which was published in Turkey in the Turkish language (first printing in October 2001 and 70. printing in April 2011, a bestseller: 150,000 copies), he stated that, in the summer holiday 1952-1953, he applied to the JAMMAT ""Joint American Military Mission for Aid to Turkey"" (renamed JUSMMAT in 1958)[10][11][12] to get a job as a translator. His application was accepted by the U.S. Army Staff in Ankara, and he was sent on duty to Erzurum as translator for Secret G2 Military Intelligence Agents Sergeant Kowalski and Sergeant Peterson.[13] After graduating high school in 1953, a scholarship was given to him by the Fulbright Program to study chemistry in the United States.[14] According to the agreement, students were elected by the U.S. Education Commission in Turkey, but funding of the scholarship was provided by the government of Turkey, because Turkish students will return after graduation in the U.S.A to become teachers in Turkey. Sinanoglu was sent with this expectation to the U.S.A. A University Student in the U.S.A. (1953-1960) He arrived in New York on September 25, 1953.[15] According to his autobiographical book mentioned above, he stayed one year in Missouri [clarification needed], after which he went to California and graduated from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1956, with highest honors in chemical engineering. Afterwards, in eight months, he earned a Master's degree with highest honors from MIT (1957); and after this, in two years, he finished his doctorate at the University of California, Berkeley (1959).[16] Subsequently, he finished a one-year postdoctoral research appointment at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California Berkeley (1959-1960).[17] So, his pupilage ended in 1960. Violating Scholarship Agreement and Military Service Obligation to Live in the U.S.A. According to the 1953 scholarship agreement, after graduation, Sinanoglu was obligated to return to Turkey to teach chemistry to Turkish students.[18] Sinanoglu stated in his autobiographical book that: ""Returning to Turkey to teach chemistry to Turkish students in the English language was worse than death, a horrible and dishonorable thing. İnstead of this, to stay in the U.S.A. and to teach chemistry to American students in the English language was a more honorable thing. I swore that: I will not return to Turkey; I will stay in the U.S.A and I will be a chemistry teacher in American universities.”[19] So Sinanoglu violated the 1953 scholarship agreement and did not return to Turkey. But there was a second problem: According to the military service obligation laws of his country, after finishing his studies in 1960, Sinanoglu was to return to Turkey to fulfill an 18-month military service obligation. The penalty for violating the scholarship agreement was a fine: the payment of a sum of money. But the penalty for violating one's military service obligation was the cancellation of one's passport and visa; this penalty could not be paid by money in those years (1960s). He stated in his autobiographical book: ""Theoretical Physicist Feza Gursey wrote a letter to me inviting me to the Middle East Technical University which was being established in Ankara, Turkey. But I couldn't return to Turkey because of the military service obligation. If I went to Turkey, I would be a soldier for 2-2,5 years.""[20] An easy way to stay in the U.S.A. was to marry and father a child in that country. A Brief First +Current event I added the {{currentevent}} tag after reading this piece by Ralph Nader in Counterpunch; seems the shit is about to hit the fan in the next couple of days. == +(independence from the union; In the article, I marked this with the subnotes: independence from whome, and date of recognition, than is from when the rest of the world regarded Hungary as a different state/polity than Austria-Hungary) +Well first off, Murphy is not allowed to edit his own page. Nor do I believe he is. Secondly, and more importantly, Gronowski needs to be banned. Are you on that? +LOL GUESS WHAT YOUR A FAGGOT. +" Another Submission I have another DYK hopeful (List of Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim managers), that I submitted under July 2nd. Could your review it? I plan to actually improve to FL Status, but not right now. Right now, I want to get it to DYK standards, then work at FL.Fan " +I have also found a page in English of the association that re-enacts the Battle of Tolentino. +I dropped by here just to say Good Job, You lived your life well. I enjoyed the one article you wrote here. Godspeed. 71.154.148.149 +List of Magsaysay Awardees Hi, Aksi. I forwarded your query to the Philippine-regional noticeboard at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. +" Thank you for your contribution and please excuse the delay in my acknowledgement. — O'Dea " +" General update I've expanded the article in general and corrected some of the English, namely some literal translations and ""false friends"". For example, it was written that Castelao was an ""universalist"", when Universalism in English is a religion (wiki it ;)). The correct translation from the Galician universalista / universalismo when speaking about politics is ""internationalist / internationalism"", and so on. Also, I have serious doubts about what's said in reference to the translations of his works... Only a handful of his short stories are translated into English as far as I know, and I don't think there's many translations around in other languages. Even his key work Sempre en Galiza is only available in the original (I think it's only now that someone is starting to translate it, into English). Most of the info I've added is from Sempre en Galiza, as this book gives lots of bibliographical information." +/f/ in Georgian? Hi. Do you have a source for your addition to the Georgian language page where you said that ფ is pronounced as /f/ when it corresponds to an /f/ sound in loan words from Greek and other languages? It was (and is) my understanding that when foreign words containing /f/ are incorporated into Georgian, the sound is spelled as ფ, and the ფ is pronounced normally (as /pʰ/). For example, პროფესია (profession, occupation) is pronounced /p'rɔpʰɛsia/ (not /p'rɔfɛsia/). As far as I am aware, /f/ is not a separate phoneme in Georgian; rather, it occurs only as an alternative pronunciation of ვ before unvoiced consonants. Admittedly, I only know a very small amount of Georgian, so I am not in a position to put myself forth as any sort of authority on this. (talk · contribs) +08, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Okay, and thanks =) To your credit, I am not sure myself what Jimbo means when he says that anyone can edit his userpage but I don't think he means that kind of stuff. - Yh me neither. The user who added it got blocked as a sock by the way. I guess he meant mess with the text etc... 22: +Yes, I think most of the editors here can. They will do so faster and better without the intransigeant interference of those who wish only to be sure that their POV is included. PMAnderson +It's sad that I couldn't get anyone to discuss this issue after waiting a month. You stalk me so you should have discussed it earlier. I personally believe the picture is real. It clearly is not photoshopped and Bill Clinton had several women (I only remember the last one's name) accussing him of sexual crimes. He even confessed his guilt to the American people on national television. Therefore the picture is real. Unless you can prove otherwise, you can abuse your admin powers all you want to control the edits, but I won't believe you. +I acquired your Tyrant Dragon today. I will give it to you at school tomorrow. +Stop your vandalism I knew what you has done on the nba page. Your edit has been reverted. Please stop or you would be blocked from editing again. +I understand. I totally agree and it sounds like a good idea. +"::You know, none of us are at your beck and call. Sometimes we have to attend to other matters in our life, so we can't provide instantaneous reponses to you. My apologies if this offends. By the way, the answers are above. I should also point out that you won't get anywhere in Wikipedia if you continue to issue commands as you have in this talk page. matrix " +" Alternative Judaism Zain, I think that Alternative Judaism is a good place to put the disclaimer about other religious groups that claim they are Jews, but I do think it is worth looking at the links a bit further, since I think you might have misread some of them. Also, remember that there is a difference between claiming descent from the ""Israelites"" and actually claiming to be practicing Judaism. Here are the links you keep using to illustrate your points, and that you added to the article: Anglo-Israelism Never claimed to be Jews, they claim that the English are the descendents of the lost tribes of Israelites. Nowhere on their site do they claim to be Jewish or practicing Judaism. I do not think there is a good argument that these people are Jews in any way. They can and are identified in the Ten Lost Tribes article. Christian Identity Weird choice. They hate Jews, look at the text of the article, where they explicitly condemn Judaism as evil. Certainly not an alternative form of Judaism, nor are they Jews. Talmidaism A subset of Christianity, or possibly Messianic Judaism, which is already in the article. Nazarene A subset of Messianic Judaism, which is already in the article Messianic Judaism Already in the article that you edited Judaizing teachers Refers to a movement of early Christians, not a current group. This is like including Jews Harp in the list - it is a reference to a historical label, not a religion. Jews for Jesus Already in the article that you edited Messianic Renewed Judaism A minor subset of Messianic Judaism Lost Ten Tribes Not a religion, but another good place to put these sort of links British-Israel-World Federation See Anglo-Israelism I am open to discussion on these, but do read through the article first. Do you agree or disagree with these points? It would be good to get this resolved. 14:54, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)" +what does trolling mean? +" WikiProject Spirits needs you! Hello, You're recieving this message as a contributor to WikiProject Spirits in the past. Currently many members work solo and articles that interest themselves, we'd like to pull the Spirits group together to allow us to raise the overall quality of articles under our banner. If you're still active on Wikipedia and keen on contributing to WikiProject Spirits, head over to the talk page and lend your voice to the discussion. (Talk•) " +My user page Hey jews bitch!! I was expecting that you will remove my user page too, as you deleted my article without providing a logic reason!!! take care your lords will be angry on you!!! About the material in my page, IT is my opinion and i will NOT change it; you have one of three choices, remove the page block my account or go fuck your parents. In any case It is a dishonore for me to remain in the same place with a bastard like ou. Dude!, I suggest you the third choice, it is more suitable to a shit like you. Did you learned now to never miss respect others? +notices}}AKA Jewboy__TOC__ |maxarchivesize = 99K |counter = 2 |minthreadsleft = 2 |minthreadstoarchive = 2 |algo = old(8d) |archive = User talk:Barek/archives/%(year)d archive %(counter)d }} {{User:Barek/talk +, 14 March 2012 (UTC) It is not the university, it is the students in computer science and related courses that develop such software. And they are the ones who use them. Not professors, administration staff, etc. 19:20 +Jebediah McQueen Who is he? It says he is Myra's half brother but has there ever been any mention of him? +" FYI Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ""User:Gods10rules, User:KeptSouth, User:Kelly, and User:Johnuniq"".The discussion is about the topic Bristol Palin.Thank you. 184.59.23.225 " +Vandalism Hello George this is CAYA you vandalised my home page and I just wanted to tell you THANK YOU! your welcome back anytime. +Leading zeros Leading zeros are necessary only for Representatives from states with ten or more seats.—Markles +I left a fairly detailed comment at the article talk page about what I think needs to be done. And checking some of the other articles you have written, i see some similar problems. '''''' ( talk ) +Companion Books Information??? I noticed that we didn't have any information for the companion books, such as The Demigod Files, or the upcoming The Ultimate Guide... Should we add a section for these? I mean, not in detail, maybe just a note, like: ==Companion Books== ===The Demigod Files=== {{Main|The Demigod Files}} The first companion book of the series, ''The Demigod Files'', was released on February 10, 2009, featuring three short stories, various pictures, and interviews of campers. It serves as an introductory guide to Camp Half-Blood. ===The Ultimate Guide=== This is the second companion book that is to be released in February, 2010. It is to feature a guide to the gods, the camp, the monsters, the labyrinth, and a lot more, all illustrated in full color. Ok, the above serves as nothing but an example, since I don't really do well at encyclopedia-tic writing. However, I really hope that sections or information like this would be written into the article. Thanks. +AndyTheGrump doesn't like the Daily Mail because he is a communist, of the worst Pol Pot variety. That's why he is lying about it's popularity. 94.116.40.108 +user:Mike Rosoft Someone made a wiki for you, and they'll delete it if you agree to put that picture up: http://mike-rosoft.wikia.com/wiki/Mike_Rosoft_Wiki +Dont take any notice of the 'toomut' marked on the map either as it isnt referring to the current day town called 'tumut' as the name tumut came from a 1950s court house that got transferred there from the Murray River (or Hume River!). +Yup, it's an editorial (I labeled it as such). Editorials are okay to cite when discussing opinions, but not when discussing facts. Since a portion of this article should discuss opinions related to the case, this article should help with that aspect ) +" Note inserted into text of Le Mas-d'Azil Please don't insert content like this into the text of an article. That is what talk pages are for. | Talk " +added links from Wiki CAF & Pima page 209.212.28.50 +whos filling in these details? i wanna know where the tracks r coming from./ thanksl +Please check it. — '''' (t/c) +, how about one of these for you?? +I I just applied for adminshipo. Will I be okay? +Don't Merge this article have enough content to stand alone. We could improve it later. +Love the beginning I like the introduction here now, but should we go on for more of a conclusion on thrash it self by decade? So we have made a summary of the begininngs. then it should have a summary of 90's then post-thrash etc? or is that more for the main article of Thrash Metal? Just throwing ideas in here... +A Brief History Of Opposition To Shugden Tibetan Government in Exile Austerlitz 88.75.66.96 +August 2013 (UTC) Will you please unblock PhD-Lin's account so that we can review the edits he made in the deletion review section? As it currently stands we are unable to view his edits. As I mentioned, there really was not a case a sock-puppetry but it was several separate people who were interested in creating a wiki page of an illness from which they suffer. Alternatively, if you would help me with the review deletion page that would be appreciated. Thanks. 16:34, 7 +RfA thanks Thank you very much for your support at my RfA. Regards, (talk) +I've also looked at Shervink's sources and I find them all to be either biased, inaplicable, or unreliable. In my opinion Shervink is advocating a minority viewpoint. Perhaps he should express within the article and note it as such, but clearly it is not reasonable to expect this view to be represented equally with generally accepted facts. I feel that this is mostly a well written and informative article and that this whole coup or counter coup thing is pointless. These events are accepted by most sources to have been a coup. What this means is that Mossadeq is accepted to have been the leader of Iran at the time in question, and to have been deposed. The phrase counter-coup implies that Mossadeq deposed the Shah first, which according to the ample scholarship cited in this article, is not what happened. It is of course possible that the concensus of scholarship on this issue is in error, but those who beleive this to be the case are by definition, holders of minority viewpoints. That said, I do think Shervink's views are interesting and should be included (and noted as a minority viewpoint) in the article. This issue is generally seen as the west vs. Iran with the shah on the side of the west. A point of view more sympathetic to the monarchy is rarely heard. Itsafarce +You can eat pork, but you murder Palestinian children +" The article on Rajini mention his real name and I am holding the article here to the same standards, just like what you;ve done with your other edits for native names. Where is the proof or the sources that explain his name is Seeman or the "" supplementary information of its origin"" and that his first name is NOT Sebastian that is different from those that mention his first name is Sebastian? Again why does adding a surname to a name make it different leave alone defame the person? What is so defamatory about the name Sebastian? Why is one article from a website more credible than the other? Please explain what I have interpreted/alleged in the main article on display? I am merely adding a person's surname name from sources. Why is a person's name subjective information? I am not questioning ""Seemans effect on congress"" for what the section says but I am just asking where the substantiation/sources for the contents in this section is coming from that you see it to be credible enough to be there that is absent in other sources. Where is the original research and the supplementary information that is absent from the sources that I've included that is present in these articles? Please explain so I can provide them. And again what is so defamatory about mentioning he has a brother? I've quoted multiple sources here, are there sources that mention he doesnt have a brother? What was that removed?" +That is both remarkably considerate and very forward-thinking of you. Sadly, such charateristics are rare. P.S. I'm pleased you value my opinions. Thank you. But don't forget that's all they are - opinions. +Taiwanese people Hi, there's a dispute here involving an anon who is trying to push the POV that the Han Chinese ethnicity does not include speakers of Wu (吳語), Min (閩語), Hakka (客家話) or Cantonese (粵語), with the conclusion being that the Hoklo and Hakka are not Han Chinese. The basis of his definition is genetic: in short, southerners with Baiyue (百越) admixture are not true Han Chinese. In fact, the entire Taiwanese people article is extremely messy. After several POV-pushing attempts, it now appears to say the same thing three or four times from different angles. The article needs to be cleaned up or merged into Demographics of Taiwan. Please come take a look if you're interested. +I will be glad to have a look, thanks. +proposed deletion of sentence in intro This sentence appears in the introductory paragraph. I propose that it should be deleted on the grounds that it is neither a fair summary of Dr. Craig's theology nor does it contain any information which is sufficiently noteworthy to be included in the introductory paragraph. We've not mentioned Craig's debates in the introductory and the few comments about Molinism that he's made are in no way more significant than his debates. Also, the sentence is oddly written and may not make sense to a novice encountering these topics for the first time. In theology he has also defended Molinism and the belief that God is, since Creation, subject to time. Thoughts? +Somebody needs to remove the duplicate information on this page. +" You really need to provide reliable sources for these titles, without imposing your own opinions here. andemu " +Kelli Pickler has sold more that 526, 000 records now its up to like 700, 000 +since they figure in Caesar's Gallic War +The Kurdish peoples article has the same problem with this one. Just because a few historians in the past suggest does not mean they are making assertions. Hence trying to get away with naming the rare historians and saying belive. Dozens of scholarly texts I've ever read and perhaps hundreds assert that the medes have no direct cultural/lineage to any modern day people. It may only be surmised (since no large migrations of peoples took place) that the mede genetic make up is mixed with the peoples of the core population in the Zagroas mountains(though still only a weak amalgamation) and then diffuses out to the peoples in the surrounding area, this includes the kurds but is not limited too them. The medes are very obscure historically and they only had conquered a small area of modern day Kurdistan (the people of that area then were considered foreign to the medes no doubt) for a short period before Elam change all that. Not even Iran can claim the Medes as their own. I believe the mede-kurd supposition is an exaggerated chauvinist connection with no genuine historical, archeological, or paleoanthropological support. So please use sorced assertion not suppositions. - +So...yeah, does anyone live near a CPC that could go and take a nice neutral, expository picture of it? (talk ⋅ contribs) +can you add more details in this article.... +This can also be proven here +Ok, what is it Why are you such a queer.. you have no power, so why the FUCK are you acting like you do. Grow up you fucking stupid shit head cock eating bastard.. seriously! Get a life, you're just a 17 yo piece of shit. +" Don't push it This edit of yours is over the line. Don't tell the reader in Wikipedia's voice that Whitehead is ""Known for: Powered flight in 1901"" when you know full well that such notional flight is utterly disputed and considered false by the Smithsonian. " +|listas=Happy Hocky Family Moves to the Country!, The +So basically, you're butthurt wiki-jew? that's lame as shit. get a life loser. +" Speedy deletion of ""Brandy scott"" A page you created, Brandy scott, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. contact meMy work " +Thanks for commenting on the Rahm Emanuel article. My suggestion? Be bold! Make edits! Change it for the better! | Talk +" This is BS. ElinorD blocked me for personal reasons. If the two (yes, TWO is a history now) cases of ""vandalism"" were worthy of a block, why did she not institute it until her feelings got all hurt? " +With reference to LowerFourth's (see above) efforts to prove the editors wrong - the 2 links given by you does not talk about the best airport-appreciate your efforts. Wiki has only place for FACTS, not for ASKING QUESTIONS and MAKING CLAIMS. Pls do not waste our time, thanks!- MountainWhiskey +, as you haven't cited most of the material +Treaty of Devol or First Crusade? , would you please refer to the academic work (author, title, publisher, page number) which states that the episode you deleted here is connected to the First Crusade (as you claimed in the edit summary)? +so i wouldn't be going to far as to say these people consist of 20 to upper 30 somethings, who hold far-left wing views, pretty much nobody but communist, anarchist and socialist. +" NPOV required The article seems to me to lean more towards an ""heroic"" account of the war than an encyclopedic piece seeking a NPOV. For instance the opening sentences of the section Soviet–Finnish relations and politics: ""After the Soviet involvement in the Finnish Civil War in 1918, no formal peace treaty was signed. In 1918 and 1919, Finnish volunteer forces conducted two unsuccessful military incursions across the Russian border"" The Finnish doctrine is embedded in its first sentence, tying ""Soviet involvement"" in the Civil War with the idea that it necessitated a ""peace treaty"", and then using this muddled logic as if it were an a priori justification for Finnish military incursions into Russia. (Russian involvement was perhaps half that of the German involvement and both together accounted for about 10% of the protagonists. 35% more Finns died in the Civil War than in the Winter War) Orthodox Finnish doctrine riddles the article, even though it contains all the information needed for an NPOV. The account of Finnish independence for instance fails to mention that the Boshevik's policy was to grant autonomy, stating the event in heroic terms instead: ""The outbreak of the First World War and the collapse of the Russian Empire gave Finland a window of opportunity; on 6 December 1917, the Senate of Finland declared the nation's independence."" Knowing the Boshevik's policy makes such doctrinal heroism ring hollow. To go through the article and cite every example of the bias and absence of references would take far too long but perhaps one or two more from various angles may make the point clearer. The article states: ""the Soviet Union changed its foreign policy toward Finland in the late 1930s. The Soviet Union began pursuing the reconquest of the provinces of Tsarist Russia"". Both parts of this need substantive verifiable reference(s). What was this change? What form did it take? In what way can it be said that the new Russia was ""pursuing reconquest""? Is such a characterisation neutral? The whole requires contextualisation as history is not a simple cause effect nil sum comic strip equation and there are many drivers for any situation. In this case the pivotal role of the economic and political policies of the West towards the revolution in Russia (as previously towards the French revolution) need to be plainly set out. However, from the implied assertions the article segues into a distortion of what would be the core issue imo for an NPOV article: ""The Soviet leadership believed that the old empire had ideal security and territorial possessions, and wanted the newly christened city of Leningrad to enjoy a similar security."". The ""old empire"" is implied as being the driver rather than any legitimate security concern even though these concerns are in fact detailed afterwards. It seems to me that the key aspect in understanding any of this is the socio-political concept of buffer states. Again, the article contains all the information required. It is just that it is presented in a non-NPOV form, and so ends up in the good guy/bad guy shoot out at the OK Corral story of the Finnish doctrine. I believe that in the West, the establishment treated Finland as a buffer state, one that stood between it and the influence of the new socialism/communism. I believe that Finland enjoyed the consequent economic benefits that flowed from this status, and which ended recently with the end of the Cold War. When all these things are included and made overt, again adding nothing into the article, the following paragraphs can be seen as the key to understanding how the war broke out. ""In April 1938, an NKVD agent, Boris Yartsev contacted the Finnish foreign minister Rudolf Holsti and Prime Minister Aimo Cajander, stating that the Soviet Union did not trust Germany and that war was considered possible between the two countries. The Red Army would not wait passively behind the border but would rather ""advance to meet the enemy."" Finnish representatives assured Yartsev that Finland was committed to a policy of neutrality and that the country would resist any armed incursion. Yartsev suggested that Finland cede or lease some islands in the Gulf of Finland along the seaward approaches to Leningrad. Finland refused. Notwithstanding what was said at the time, history, in the simplest manner, seems to me to record its verdict on the two parties positions. Finland's behaviour during WW2 merited her having to pay war reparations. Russia's assessment of Finland's true position (and intent?) was vindicated. In my opinion the NPOV could easily be resolved by some rebalancing of the introduction and by atte +I am impressed that so many editors have noted the poor quality of this page, and yet none has deigned to add to the article. I would appreciate some help, rather than being accused of bias for trying to start working on a subject that deserves to be treated as a full fledged article. I am not an expert in this area, but I feel that there is enough knowledge in the wikipedia community to improve this article to a higher standard than I am personally capable of. I must also apologize for being distracted by other issues on wikipedia. Nonetheless, I think this article is valuable, even though it deserves massive improvement. +my apologies suck my junk bitch!!! +" Keep an eye out Question re image Some of us have been working on the Oil shale extraction article in hopes of restarting an FA process. Question: There is an image on page 14 of this DOE paper on oil shale (page 14, it takes a little while to load) that presents a schematic overview of the process. Do you think this would be a useful addition? If so, how to size it? Your reply at the article talk page would be appreciated. Sincerely, Incentive system for reviewers, again WT:FAR. To be frank, I think there is 0% chance that the average detail of reviews will decrease. ' (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV Re:GA articlehistory errors Okay, thanks for letting me know, but now I'm not sure how to add the fact that The Boy Who Knew Too Much is a GA since I did what's on that page you linked too. ' {talk} Okay, thanks. I've been trying to help lower the backlog on the GAN page, didn't see how it was screwed up before. Also, why exactly is it labeled as ""Arts"" when it's a GA for ""Theater, film and drama"" ? ' {talk} Alright, thanks again. I'm not really planning on doing that much GAN reviews, but I think I'll just have to start looking at the AH before I put the template up. Thanks again. ' {talk} Wikipedia:WikiProject Dyslexia/Dyslexia sub-articles Hi I have added a few research documents on the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Dyslexia/Dyslexia sub-articles sandbox, which may resolve some of the issues you highlighted when you last visited the Dyslexia article Re: Asthma FAR I apologize; I was not active on Wikipedia at the time of your request. — দ Bringing to your notice Someone in WP management needs to look at the Barbara Biggs entry, as it seems to my amateur eyes to be largely an advertizement of Biggs books, and a beat-up of her deeds and status based on what is written in same self-authored books. There are some references to media who interviewed her about her books/deeds but these again rested mostly on her own opinions about herself drawn from her self-authored books. Is there not supposed to be independant verification of her claims? 58.165.69.67 Editing survey Hi SandyGeorgia. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic “current events” articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at Barack Obama that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=P6r2MmP9rbFMuDigYielAQ_3d_3d Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons | (talk) FAC/FAR Might be fading away.... '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') paid editing=POV Queen Anne FAR {{#if:| for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/ +Ah, some old dragon I guess. Nothing to do with Silas Tomkyn Comberbache. +Blah Blah Blah. Cry Me A River. Go suck a prick. You aint even a Flo Rida fan. +" Sigh, but surely I'm the one who hounds him and bullies him and won't leave him alone. Do as you will Wee. Regards. (talk) " +Request for comment One editor has stated that the file should be deleted from the article Horse theft. Another editor has stated that it should not be. +Whistle Register When did she sing in the whistle register? +I really fail to see how I made a personal attack. I replied to various attacks made on me clarifying, and yet I am blocked? Everything I wrote is true and I do feel this block is unwarranted and uncalled for. There is no merits unless you believe that the personal attacks, backbiting and claims made against me are true - thus encouraging incivility, while keeping me from defending myself by stating the facts. +" has existed on all continents. And because it is a general name, it should reflect general details rather than anything specific. This is basically why the term prehistoric religion is not used, because it is too general. Oh yeah and origin of religion is very precise. I'm still waiting for a better title. yes origin of religion is not precise, this is why I changed the name to ""Evolutionary theories on the origin of religion"". However if evolution is accepted as fact, then teleological arguments on the origin of religion cannot be considered scientific, in which case the evolutionary theories on the origin of religion and ""origin of religion"" are the same. First of all I have told you a thousand times already that actual evolutionary theories on the origin of religion are like those of Boyer, Wolpert and Dawkins and they are miles away from what you have been writing about. Also the logic you present above is simply not correct at all. The fact that human physiology is a product of biological evolution does not mean that the origin of religion can be explained through evolutionary mechanisms or as a product of biological evolution. Perhaps without the evolution of certain cognitive capacities human practices like religion would not be possible, but the origin of religion itself may be entirely ""social"" or ""cultural"" given a certain state of cognitive evolution. If that were the case then theories of religion's origin would not be evolutionary theories at all, yet they would be equally ""scientific"" and clearly non-religious in nature. That is to say biological evolution itself is not necessarily causal of religion, even if it may be necessary to create a certain precondition (e.g. a capacity for symbolic thought) for religious belief. content dispute We have a content dispute that is mainly between myself and you. Dbachmann occasionaly gets involved switching between sides. But essentially this is between me and you. This is why we are not making progress, because we do not have any editors who are willing to dedicate the time and effort to work on this this. Consequently you are taking advantage of this lack of editors and you are using an old AFD as your leverage, because you can run to any admin, who only know the rules and know little about content. This is unfair and unacademic and is very political. Dbachmann knows very well that the articles I created are valid. He has admitted that he agrees in principal with the ideas I have presented, but simply disagrees with me because he dislikes my demeanor User_talk:Dbachmann#origin_of_religion. I had worked on the article ""Origin of language"" using the same approach. Before I started working on the origin of language, the topic was approached from a psychological or sociological perspective filled with archaic fringe and opinionated theories. I proceeded to add the evolutionary perspective to the article, after which Dbachmann reviewed the article with some refactoring he upgraded the article to B-class. I used the same approach on the origin of religion only to be met with some of the worst hostility to knowledge. As I often mention, you had even disputed the out of Africa hypothesis, or that grave goods are considered evidence of a belief in the afterlife . Here you are seen to be making up your own theories. So I do feel justified to doubt the credibility of some of your assertions and also some of the other editors. I have always asked admins and a lot of other editors to assist in dispute resolution, but many seem content with pushing buttons and chasing after vandals and boosting their egos by blocking people, they have no interest in content. So I propose to go for dispute resolution, if you think you have a case, you should opt for it. If you are afraid and want to continue using the archaic AFD as your silver bullet, then this dispute will needlessly continue. Of course the result will be blocks of which I am the top candidate, but what a waste that would be. Who would be there to provide education on grave goods. You've not described a content dispute but simply congratulated yourself, dismissed the behavioral policing of admins, and fabricated behavior on my part. I have not and do not dispute the fact that homo sapiens originated in Africa from where mass dispersal took place sometime between 55,000 and 60,000 +" Oh, really? I'll have to ask Jossi about this. I hope a checkuser account does check it out then. ×talk " +I'm travelling, and will propose adds when I return. Glad to see G. has ceased his hatty silliness. +ARE YOU NUTS WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU VANDALISING several articles BY REMOVING LINKS?! i mean guru and dj premier use your brain first if you got any, remove links then +"::""Any opinion that you have is not allowed on this talk page."" Can you elaborate what opinions are not allowed on this talk page and what Wikipedia guidelines is that based on? ' " +I think your cock needs protecting +" Kickstart disks The current article states 'subsequent Amiga models all used ROM chips' [following the A1000] in relation to Kickstart. However, I remember that the Amiga 3000 also required such a Kickstart disk. Can anyone confirm? Thanks! Most A3000s used ROMs, but some (like mine) had a small ""Super Kickstart"" in ROM which read Kickstart from floppy or hard disk. (Super Kickstart was based on AmigaOS 1.4, which never appeared anywhere else.) IIRC, only the machines manufactured in Europe had ""Super Kickstart"", but I may well be wrong on that detail. I do know that I never got my machine to boot a v3.x AmigaOS =(. Cheers, (talk) Freeing memory (This is relevant to a different Wikipedia article). I have the statement in front of me that, when a program terminates in AmigaOS, memory assigned by the program is not freed, and that it is therefore vital for the program to release all memory that it asked for, otherwise it is permanently ""leaked"". Is this the case? Memory that is not freed before termination of a program in the Amiga OS is leaked (assuming it was supposed to be freed - in some cases a program may have allocated structures and attached them to system objects, such as a device node). One of the most common modes of testing on the Amiga was checking free memory after program exit; there were many tools that automated that. Normal behavior of a program was to free all memory, and all malloc'd memory was automatically freed via exit-time hooks. (I.e. leaking memory typically only happened to memory obtained via AllocMem() and the like.) Indeed. AmigaOS does little to no resource tracking in order to save the memory overhead that it costs to include tracking. There was also a third-party program that patched many allocate/free resource functions (e.g. AllocMem/FreeMem, OpenWindow/CloseWindow) and added resource tracking to them, however this would break any software that deliberately allocate memory then exited, for example programs which installed patches on system functions. Programs assume the responsibility for freeing all allocated memory. The standard C library implementation in most Amiga C compilers used an onexit handler that freed any memory allocated with the malloc() implementation, but if the program crashed or the AmigaOS memory allocation routines were called directly, memory allocations were not freed. Other languages had varying degrees of support for tracking memory, usually (like C) only if you used the language-specific memory allocators. Thank you for your replies. The reason for the question relates to a discussion I've been having on memory leak. I'm going to post a question which is very subjective, but maybe there's a consensus. The article includes ""In modern operating systems, normal memory used by an application is released when the application terminates"". Part of the debate is over whether this is really true, and whether it should say ""In some operating systems..."". The leading question is: is AmigaOS a ""modern operating system""? A supplementary dispute, where it says ""The application assumes that the request for memory has succeeded, and continues on this basis. This will typically result in an access violation but in some cases may result in damaging information belonging to this or (in primitive systems) some other application."" Should this have ""some systems"" in place of ""primitive systems""? Thanks in advance. The amiga would be included in ""modern operating systems"", and it does release ""normal memory"" (i.e. malloced) when the application ends. Program crashes on an Amiga do not release memory, so you could say it leaks on process crash. And a program that uses things like OpenFile() instead of open() will leak a filehandle (and some memory) if the program calls exit() without closing the file. As for your second question, the answer would be ""some systems"" - many ""modern"" embedded systems (including running unix variants like uclinux) do not have memory protection, and can read (and possibly write) structures using NULL as a pointer without an access violation. Personally, I HATE programs that don't check malloc (or any other calls) for failure. Good programming practice on the Amiga (due to the lack of VM) was to test programs and the OS against random memory allocation failures to see if they recovered cleanly or not. All allocations (and all system calls, etc) should be checked for failure and +Hi there. In case you aren't a robot, stop sending me shit messages and instead check my edits. I am the copyright owner. You must cease and decist from distributing my content. +you would have an anti-communist box on your page, wouldn't you? +No, I do agree with , he is excellent. And you, , you might have something wrong with understanding others and expressing yourself. Are you retired? Why are you so active always? What such a retired and inactive editor could have made me experience blocked for 24 hours? I do appreciate with you so much, and this is the nice sarcasm for you, . +of German Reich (1935–1945).svg +Well Thanks for your well-pointed assertion on my RfC. You seem to know a lot about Wikipedia - which I don't. I have been wanting to make a formal complaint against Ronnotel - do you know the procedure? Thanks +" USER JZA This editor continues to manipulate edits in the Liverpool area. He has removed this text ""Waterloo holds the postcode ""L22"" and adjoins Blundellsands and Crosby to the north and Seaforth to the south and is a northern suburb of the city of Liverpool"" by stating it is unsourced. What is unsourced? That it is a northern suburb of Liverpool? that can be altered perhaps..............What about L22 POSTCODE? you think that is not true? What about adjoining Blundellsands and Crosby? You think that is unsourced? Cut the fony edits please Jza " +" Thanks for your comment. But ""flaunting knowledge""? I have explicitly stated in many places, including outside of wikipedia, that I am NOT an expert... talk " +Error: Oldest Champion Batista is not 66 years old. According to several site bios, he is around his early 40's. This needs to be corrected once the linage of the title is resolved. +Speedy deletion declined: User:Jessiex23/sandbox Hello Whpq. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Jessiex23/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Looks like a valid sandbox for wiki markup for an article. Thank you. +. Removed, because it hasn't been fixed +That is what Flowers is trying to tell you. +Possibly unfree Image:Graduation_70s.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Graduation_70s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. talk +- there is alas little point in becoming obsessive about someone who isn't important at all, such as this individual, as you have done. Given that the article has been deleted once already, and is clearly inconsistent with policy, and that the predictions made by some about Nobel Prizes etc are entirely absurd, it is clear that it will be deleted, preferably sooner rather than later. Arguing about this is I'm afraid rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. +" Yes, there is. If one clicks on the ""History"" tab at the top of the article, one can see any comments or explanations that the editor has made when summarising their edit. In this case I was the editor that changed the wording back to what had been the consensus for some months. My edit summary was: ""'British Isles' included in section heading, so no confusion (please see: British_Isles_naming_dispute)"". It's not just Irish Nationalists that are a wee bit (too?) sensitive about the term and in this case the sub-heading of ""British Isles"" should dispel any lingering confusion - as does the internal linking or re-direction of ""The North East Atlantic Archipelago"". If, after reading the referenced article, you are still unclear as to the rationale for the use I can try and explain further, but I hope the article will explain the term. NEAA also includes ""twiddly bits"" like the Faeroes and the Channel Islands that are generally excluded from the ambit of the ""British Isles"". Thank you for your interest in making Wikipedia a better encyclopaedia!...(kiwiexile at DMOZ) • " +20:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC +Is that what you want? For me to go away from here? Beause you may just what you wished for. +" Fair enough. I've read the link, and it says that in general 'claimed' shouldn't be used when 'said' would work just as well. Wouldn't that be the case here? ""Whose members condemned the [X] they said he had created..."" Does that work?" +These two are one and the same. Matt is the guy's name and Obadiah Parker is his bands name. +republic of mosquito FAGGOT! FAGGOT! GET OFF MY INTERNET! +This is not true. Before the beginning of the show Natalia Germanou says that the source taken by the IFPI. If it was wrong, IFPI would have sued the show but it didn't. Also, the Chart Show have two people of IFPI who study the discography of Greece since 1950. So the sources are reliable. +Ganga Thanks for making me aware of the canvassing breach of wikirules. Please contribute to the discussion. I do not know your opinion, so it is not a breach of wp:canvassin +Turtle Racing Sorry for my premature removal of the afd tag. I didn't know exactly what to do. How would you alert an admin or who ever to close it in this or similar situations. +Askam and Ireleth (again) Hi, I have worked on your suggestions- could you please take another look, and see if I have properly managed what you suggested, and also see if there is anything else that could be improved in the article? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cougar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' " +To KF To User KF: Don't try to reason with Doc. He's unreasonable, a definite case of head in cement syndrome and possible abuse of his authority by just deleting without being sure of his right to act summarily. I noticed he's had more of his administrative decisions reversed by other administrators, most notably Remember the dot reversing him most recently than any other admin so far as I've seen. So just ignore him and reinstate the article with the tags you propose. He does anything to it again, either you can complain against him to the Arbitration Committee or to a more reasonable administrator for reversal of all his or her decisions. Judicial action would be a last resort if internal processes fail to produce a satisfactory result, but it's always a possibility. But go to User Remember the dot, he or she will likely give you a fair hearing, more fair than you get here. I imagine this guy will want to block me for this, but if he does, well I'll just appeal to the above named administrator, or sue him before an arbitration hearing here, or if needed as a very last resort, judicial action. To Doc To whom Doc is: I advise KF to ignore your actions and denials of petition and just reinstate the article you deleted in its original terms and add the tags he proposes him or herself. If you delete it again, I advised him to complain against you before administrator Remember the dot to overturn your adverse to KF decisions or go to the Arbitration Committee with a complaint and if as a last resort, bring judicial action against you. Your abuse needs to be stopped. You seem mean spirited, crude and abusive of your power. I figure you're going to try to block me. If you do, I'll appeal to Remember the dot or Arb Comm, or last resort legal options which is something I don't relish doing, but is always a last card to play I suppose. +"to the word ""officially""... " +" I suspect Sceptre is correct. This was previously discussed here. " +" Yes, it sounds to me that way. it may sound different to you. That is exactly why it is original research, performed by you and me. What up? " +" March 2007 (UTC) About which one falls through, note what Angier says at the end. He says each time he stepped into the machine he didn't know if he was going to be the man in the balcony (""the prestige"") or in the water tank (""the box""). Wouldn't this imply that which one falls into the tank isn't the same each time, that sometimes it's the clone and sometimes it's the ""original"" Angier (even though, after a few trial runs, there wouldn't be an original Angier, just clones)? Juts a thought. 15:47, 29" +, BECAUSE I WILL GET A NEW ADDRESS IF I GET BLOCKED. +RS or not? This should count as a reliable source. What we should do is get the book reviewed, read them, and use them to consider how best to use the source. There is no evidence I found that stated that the book's reputation is anything like Hmong: History of a People +IMDB is not a reliable source for anything. +You and I obviously differ in what misquoting means. And the editor said that critique of temperament tests could be inserted. +Thanks! And the same to you. I am a bit confused because the feature shows a lot of redirects but if I check the articles there are none. I assume it has to do with the U-boats template and the database. I will check in the next couple of days and see what happens! +the words for Adige and Tirolo, respectively +Wow That's over a megabyte! +Separate article for Moynihan Station? I think the time has come to give moynihan Station its own entry. There is enough information, and released sketches for this. +A number of members from my unit assisted in both aforementioned events. +"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! STalk to me" +Nice fixup of Halvard Lange Wow; three minutes after I wrote the first draft, you found the Norwegian labor party link(which I thought there probably would be one, somewhere) and fixed it up. Wow, I say again. I'm curious; did you find it via the stub-cat, or some other method? Thanks for your work on the 'pedia! +Dicklyon did mention MOS:CAPS in at least one move summary and had mentioned the meridians at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#Exceptions.3F. I am also not happy with two conversations. But I think MOS:CAPS might be a better place since some disagreement stems from Ngram book counting, which I regard as problematic. +" This ""tell me I'm good"" ""review"" is nothing but a filibuster shifting attention from the main case and garnering ""consensus"" from fellow cops. Not worth the time anyway. " +Afd vote on FTS== Sincere apologies for clobbering your vote. Don't know how it happened, and I assure you it wasn't intentional. 'S ok. Shit happens. Isotalo == +Um Dude I hate to FUCKING break this to you, but THE GAME is still on G-Unit. http://www.thisis50.com/ WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN. NEXT TIME KNOW A THING OR TWO ABOUT HIP HOP BEFORE EDITING THE FUCKING WIKIPEDIA PAGE. +" Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. e1980 " +Geertz and Suharto Hi Indon - :I'm leaving this note on yours and Imoeng's talk page - Clifford Geertz died on the 30th - I think it should be on the news in the portal - but would prefer you guys put it on. I think his and Tommy Suharto's release should be on the news page - it is very symbolic! SatuSuro +Citations needed Thank you for your addition to Premenstrual syndrome. I have corrected a few small errors and moved part of it to the ==History== section. Your information needs to be supported by WP:Citations to WP:Reliable sources, such as the books or articles that the direct quotations were copied from. Please try to add those. If it's too hard to figure out, then do your best, or leave a note at Talk:Premenstrual syndrome with the names of the books, the authors, and other appropriate information, and someone else will try to fix it for you. Thanks, +Guy, one of the points that I was trying to explain to Askahrc in my now-infamous discussion on his talk page is that he couldn’t attack Barney off-wiki and then accuse Barney of failing to assume good faith on-wiki. Assume good faith is not a suicide pact. Barney could not reasonably be expected to read Askahrc’s insulting rant and then still assume that Askahrc was operating in good faith. The distinction between on and off wiki became irrelevant when Askahrc did what he did. 76.107.171.90 +Oh yes, the classic Armenain grandmothers spewing their hate venom. +" Very much agree that Wiki should not end up as a How to abuse guide. But there does need to be balance with detail of events. Any other suggestions? TTFN " +"This is ridiculous. ""It makes Iranians look stupid""...? Who the fuck are you? A political commentator? An outspoken, self-proclaimed expert on contemporary Iranian politics? Oh right, my pen-name is The Persian Cataphract, so let me try to decipher your next tactical move. The race card? Oh right, your name's not Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. Let me guess the next one. Nationalist. That's right, you'll throw each and every syllable of content present in my message, in favour of this preconceived straw-man, fallacy and red herring. You'll probably even point to my liberal use of profanity. I just must be nothing else than this lion-and-sun foam-at-mouth Persian nationalist with an inferiority complex spiced with a pinch of victim mentality. And certainly I must be dumb, as you so eloquently have arbitrated above. You said it yourself, right here: ...I am used to being attacked by editors whose very account names show they are here for single-topic pov-pushing. Who do you expect to be neutral on topics of Iranian nationalism? A user called ""IranianGuy"", or a Swiss editor contributing under his real name and no stakes in the matter? Who, for that matter, do you expect to be neutral on topics of Armenian nationalism, an editor called ""AraratArev"" (vel sim.)... Is that how you assess content? By making a shallow assumption on pen-names? Expectations? The God-given right to anonymity on the Internet? How fucking petty are you and the idiot who made you an administrator? What next, are you going to ban Iranians from editing or contributing to Iran-related articles? Indeed not just a laughable policy, but indeed a dangerous one as well. Most of the world-class authorities are Iranians. With your fucked up logic, we should dismiss their contributions because irrespective of their content, you'll instead look at their political affiliations and their names and put it into the bin of rejection. Oh right, you're Swiss and because Switzerland is this shining paragon of neutrality hosting thousands of bank accounts of Islamic terror organization, you're obviously this stereotypical neutralist... Good lord, listen to yourself. Luckily academia doesn't work like that. Scholarly enterprise and political affiliations remain strictly separated. So it doesn't really matter if Kaveh Farrokh or anyone else is a self-declared outspoken Nazi, Communist, Socialist, Liberal, Conservative or what have you, it has no bearing on content that must be assessed purely by content. That's NPOV. A sober, neutral, objective approach, just bare-bones, bare-knuckles source critique. Source. Critique. Make an assessment on the content, not the person(s). You marginalized IranianGuy. Period. And as conveniently as you shrugged him off because of his pen-name, you shrugged off his fully legitimate criticism of your approach. No matter what country or pen-name or real name you have, it has a universal stamp: Asshole behaviour. " +This is yet another question - what is the player's perceived probability of winning by switching? Question for you - in the regular set up, if Monty forgets where the car is and opens a door at random (without letting on to anyone that he forgot) but fortuitously reveals a goat, what would you say is the player's chance of winning by switching? Does it matter whether the player knows Monty forgot? Rick Block (talk) +Could the name have something to do with the Pashtun tribe, Shirwani, which became widespread throughout what is Punjab and its members were in important positions throughout North India? Furthermore, just because a name did not exist historically does not mean a culture, people and their history did not exist. India did not exist but Hindustan did - just as Bharat existed before Muslims conquered and renamed it. Sherwani was developed in Hindustan by descendants of Turco-Afghans, Mughals etc. just as they also gave Hindustan their adapted language, food, dress and customs etc. These are the antecedents of Pakistan. o +REDIRECT Talk:Michael Morrison (footballer) +" LOL! Oops, sorry. I thought you were WinCEB (didn't check, expected him on my talk, started with ""W""). lol Okay. haha. Well, then. Ahem. So should I just change the templates? " +Isn't it also played on the reactor deck in SS1? +" Perhaps the ""self-advertising"" character of this article would be somewhat abrogated by a little criticism. In this article http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/a-defence-force-of-terminators-is-almost-here-20090510-az6u.html?page=2 he writes: ""Remember, one of the rules when it comes to technology is Moore's law, that the computing power that can fit on a microchip doubles just under every two years. If this trend holds true, as it has for the past several decades, Australia's Force 2030 will be operating in a world in which our information technology will be a billion times more powerful than today. Notably, this isn't an amorphous ""billion"", as Dr Evil would pontificate in the movie Austin Powers, but literally taking the power of our current computers multiplying it by 1,000,000,000. But imagine if that law doesn't hold true, and Moore's Law works out at only a hundredth of its past pace. Then the computers that power robots in the era of Force 2030 will only be a mere 1,000,000 times more powerful."" Ironically, his grasp of numeric quantities is probably even further off than Dr. Evil's. If ""computing power"" doubles every two years for twenty years, the resulting increase in computing power would be just 1024 times more powerful (2^10 = 1024 see http://www.google.com/search?q=2^10&ie;=utf-8&oe;=utf-8&aq;=t), not ""a billion"". And if computing power increased at 1/100th of its current pace (i.e. instead of doubling, increasing at one-one-hundredth of 2 = 0.02 per annum), the resulting increase in power would be just 1.02^10: computers would be 1.21899442 times as powerful as those today. All this would probably be more relevant if he even managed to get Moore's Law correct in the first place. Moore's Law did not relate to ""computing power"" but to the density of transistors in a given area. In practical terms, a doubling of the number of transistors /= doubling of computing power... so we CERTAINLY aren't going to facing armies of Terminators, a ""billion"" times more computationally powerful than the robots of today!!! I shudder to think that this is the quality of strategic advice being given to the highest eschalons of the US government!!! 0:20 (UTC) 11 May 2009" +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —' (talk) The article Sarah Ford has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Please also note that articles must be on notable subjects and should cite to reliable sources which verify their content. Please only repost the article in a form that meets these standards. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —' (talk) +Mike, no problem, check my edit summaries for details on why. +WTF? you wanna go toe to toe you weakling white bitch?124.180.159.192 +Every box has to be on a page by itself to be able to shorten the name. If it is already, you can add it to your page by putting the name of the page between double curly brackets {{}}. For example, the page . did I err?|Contribs +Who are you talking to? If that is a question for one particular editor, you should place it on their talk page +Dakota Fanning Is Dakota Fanning really an action movie actress? 201.68.206.254 +sorry but you are wrong on the dbz cursing. dont beat yourself up its not that big of a deal i have already fixed it. We all make mistakes. +" Volume 5? From his website: ""All contents of The PainWhen Will It End?, Issue #5 are restricted from reproduction in print or electronic media under authority of Special Order #237 by the Federal Communications Commission."" Why? " +Might I remind you that the basis for deciding what goes in here is the science and no the science is telling us that the satellites are the best indicator of global warming and as no one has given any good scientific reason not to use the satellites and the scientists are saying these are the most credible dataset, it it seems we will be compelled to use the satellites data. +15:27, 4 August 2013 (GMT) +" POV folks NOT WELCOME HERE from you: This sort of mindset is completely incompatible with Wikipedia's ethos. People here for an advocacy role are a problem, as we follow WP:NPOV. Pro-Israeli, Pro-Jew (I'm a Jew), Pro-Palestinian, Pro-Arab points of view are garbage and not welcome here. Whomever ""infiltrated"" this nest of editors did us a great service, unfortunately. I suspect your edits are now going to be reviewed in short order. Lawrence Cohen § t/e Perhaps you want to check out the Noticeboard for Palestine-related topics which is distinctly Pro-Palestinian, has requests for other editors to check out articles, to help create consensus for articles, as well as suggestions to create articles essentially as attack pages. Maybe you will send them a little note of unwelcome. Thank you. " +And the IOC should be belived over the BOA as to the name of their team why exactly? Never mind the fact that IOC page doesn't say what I asked for, it merely refers to the name by the common short form. Infact, it uses the name Great Britain in a list of NOCs, and the British NOC is called the BOA, so it's usable for nothing. The NI sources are about the branding alone, so they're irrelevent. +Opening sentence needs improvement The current version of the opening sentence needs work. Racism is commonly defined as a belief or doctrine where inherent biological differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, with a corollary that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others. It is too wordy, grammatically awkward, and doesn't adequately define the topic. Also, the words are almost the same as the ones that appear in the reference. +LIAR FOR JESUS Go to hell -Greengrounds +Requested citation added, and from someone who knew him intimately. Can we please now stop this increasingly tiresome discussion? +" SS100X was the secret service code name given the Lincoln that Kennedy died in, not ""X-100"", you dumb bastard....Next time do your homework." +" SMS size wrong The article states that SMS messages are ""at most 160 bytes""; however, this is inaccurate, as SMS messages have a maximum of 140 bytes. They can send 160 characters thanks to a 7-bit encoding (GSM 03.38), but the size in bytes is still 140. However, I did not change the text because it links to a source (Techcrunch) where they do some calculation and mention 160 bytes. How shall we fix this?" +I've joined the discussion, have modified my last entry and have removed the earlier citation attributed to Bushell that another editor made (which, in my opinion, was far more distasteful). I'll be amazed if you still feel this isn't acceptable. +" Courtney Simpson Ah, nuts. If she specifically objects, I guess that is different, since it is a borderline case. It's not as if she was written up in the New York Times, after all. That is the principle of WP:BLP, ""do no harm"", and it's not as if we can't write everything else without mentioning the name. Are you quite sure it is her? May I forward your email to Tabercil, and see if he agrees? Or better yet, can you forward her original mail to both of us? I will reply by email as well so you'll have my email address. (squeak) " +"==Featured article review for Order of Canada== {{#if:| for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Delist"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You are receiving this notice because you have been identified as one of the top three editors of the article based on edit count. Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII & George VI Howdy Mies. I believe Neelix readings of those RMs, isn't entirley accurate - particularly concerning George V. Anyways, I moved towards rejecting of country - because of the article James I of England. Succession I've long taken the view that GoodDay's disruptive comments are best ignored. I hope we can agree on that. ) Sometimes he can be disruptive; though, he's good enough to restrict it to talk pages, as far as I've experienced. But, then, we can all be disruptive, at times; I know there are people who think I am. Ħ ""...he's good enough to restrict it to talk pages, as far as I've experienced.."" Lucky you! Stop stirring drama, Ghmyrtle. Proposal Would you like to take a look at That's a good start. I thought the article could be more broad, though, covering all reform proposals and those that came up this year would be a subsection; a literal transplantation of Act of Settlement 1701#Amendment proposals to its own article, since the reforms discussed in that subsection actually encompass more than just the Act of Settlement. Ħ Sorry, I thought you weren't around. Well, I thought that as it is these specific proposals that are going to be progressed, rather than the various past proposals, they should have their own article, with a small amount of background. But I'm open to all constructive suggestions, and I doubt if I'll want to be that closely involved with the article as it develops (famous last words....) Okay; well, we'll see how it progresses/evolves. Ħ Somehow, I knew (sooner or later) you were gonna de-emphasis the United Kingdom. No worries though, I'm not gonna start an edit-war or a 10+ days worth of discussion. RE: EIIR Diamond Jubilee umm, i didn explain my edits and removal, conversely you didnt explain either reversal, which per BRD means discus and discussion doesnt happen with an initiation of dialogue or reasons. Anhyway, i put it on the talk page. 18:16, +" Have sheperd instead. " +King of Kvenland Only a Swede would try to insert Charles IX in an article about the Kings of Kvenland. I'll forgive you your nationalistic aspirations, but you must realize that Charles IX had nothing whatsoever to do with the ancient Kvenland.http://www.emersonkent.com/images/maps/europe_814.jpg Do you realize that? +Thanks, I won't readd the tag as an editor has raised an objection to its speedy deletion on AFD. +00:09 16 March 2014 (UTC) +TAD, PLEASE communicate with Amaury or an admin if possible, now my talkpage is being vandalized! 84.90.219.128 +You really have no life, huh? I sure am glad I'm not you! Why don't you go eat your mother's pizza bagels, homo. +"::I'm ok with the current description. Fyslee wants it changed. My response was to him. You remedy for listing the practitioners using AK seems like WP:SYNTH to me and may be OR. We have a RS, ACA, why don't we go with that until we find a better source? ""used largely by chiropractors and to an unknown extent , by physicians, dentists, nutritionists, physical therapists, massage therapists, and nurses."" Regarding you statement sub-lingual or olfactory stimulation are hardly more plausible. The connections from mouth to muscle are there. Are you aware that smell effects the limbic system and create global changes in the CNS? Did you know that ""Tasting sweet food elicits insulin release prior to increasing plasma glucose levels, known as cephalic phase insulin release? Are you aware that in rats, food deposited in the mouth makes its way to the brain in less than 30 seconds? " +U POUR ADMIN, U UPDATE VANDAL COUNT, WHILE REAL ADMIN RVTS HAHAHAHAH!!!AH Say after me... No More Bush, phew! LOLZZ MAYBE YOUZ WANTS TO CHECK YUR PAGES BEFROE YOU PROTECT SUM???? '''PS I DROVE TO WORK JUST SO I COUDL MAKE THIS EDITS!!!! LOLLL>>> +culture movement that is +I am Reginald Van Proofreader the IV. I endeavor at all times to defend the honor and dignity of the English language. +" Türkvizyon 2013 Hi AxG, An editor contacted me at commons asking me to make a participation map for Türkvizyon 2013. However, I don't think it is going to be as simple as one may expect. The maps, as I know them, only highlight country borders, yet this contest is for Turkish speaking countries and regions. For example, Russia is participating, as are regions within Russia itself, Ukraine and its region Crimea, and finally Xinjiang (a region within China). Is this going to be easy or not? Mᴥuse " +Time goes by, as usual. The new selectee is Global File System, a networked file system with an interesting history of freedom, proprietaryness, and refreedom. +" Oh, what a mess. Multiple formats bedevil the writing of a logically-structured encyclopedia! I can see valid arguments for maintaining (although how much that needs to be done is moot) different chronologies for UK and US releases, because of the various Columbia chop-ups that were released in the early years, but trying to keep them in step is an arduous task. Most Beatles albums tend to be listed in order of their UK release (which usually preceded other locations), and that, per WP:ENGVAR, should IMHO be the norm as regards principal chronology. There's no issue with listing colonial releases in the main article, but little to be gained in having separate articles. As regards this one, as far as the UK is concerned, it was a double EP, and I see no problem in describing that initial release as an ""album"", for simplicity's sake, and all variations should follow from that. However, this article is but an outpost of WP:Beatles and perhaps some wider input would be useful. andemu " +-We should just use mainstream sources, -Sammycat. +In my opinion, the entire paragraph is POV; it reads like a statement carefully put together by 'IP' supporters to argue the case. I'd suggest just nuking the whole paragraph since it adds nothing to the article. I've held back from doing so immediately because of the {{POV}} tag; are there any objections? T +but also deleated the talk page several times +AS A PROMINENT PROFESSOR OF BIOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA, I RESENT THIS BAN; MOREOVER, I FEEL AS IF MY RIGHT TO FREELY EDIT WIKIPEDIA—A RIGHT MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES—HAS BEEN VIOLATED. THEREFORE, I THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO UNBAN ME. MY CONTRIBUTIONS ONLY PROVE USEFUL TO THE USERS OF THE INTERNET. +I lived in the 17th century. My father was a diplomat and poet. I improved telescoopes and discovered moons. I greatly improved the time keeping abilities of clocks by using a pendulum. Who am I? +REDIRECT Talk:The Secret of the Sagala +" DYK for Smoking in Japan On 3 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Smoking in Japan, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " +Judaispreist Just want to you know how delighted I am by the outcome of Judaispriest's report. +I was reverted the page, a vandal erase the content (I´m spanish, my english...it´s a crap). +" No worries, if the DRV isn't overturned the article can be built up in userspace and relaunched. Let me know what happens as I'm waaaay behind in my watchlist so i won't notice much terribly soon. Banjeboi " +ICAO Sign 'UAE' I object to the fact that the ICAO has given the codename 'UAE' to Emirates Airlines because of the fact that Emirates is not the UAE's national airline, which Etihad Airways is. +Part of the casus belli Also, if Hezbollah had been disarmed as stated in the United Nations Security Resolution 1559, this conflict would not have happened. There would have been no Hezbollah and therefore no Hezbollah raid. This is part of the casus belli. Let's keep the facts! +Heikki Kovalainen Thanks for fixing my error in the infobox. Regards. +" I agree with the deletion of the article. But I think that redirecting it to List of never built Disney attractions would be easier, that way the link itself will not be lost but there will be no individual article for this never-built attraction. Anyway, I will support any deletion, merge or whatever. ۞pεth " +Well... yeah...but wouldn't it be awesome if they were related? And WHY is Leo's article gone?! +" Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Texas at Austin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. talk " +"::Actually, you're not correct. The letter I wrote above was in response to my discovering that Aeon1006 had started engaging in other ""roles of trust"" on WP, namely he is now a mediator. The ""evidence"" that follows was copy/pasted from an AMA letter that was deleted and not responded to. Aeon1006 never really responded to these allegations at all. If I am incorrect, I would sure like to see a link. I firmly believe that mediators should be neutral, and for the above numerous reasons, I do not believe that Aeon1006 can be so. Furthermore, I do not believe that Doc Tropics can be neutral either, seeing as how he posted his opinion on an RfC BEFORE the accused party had even written a response AND because Doc Tropics was also an online friend of one of accusing parties. I understand the need for your to ""stick up"" for your friend here, but there really is no basis for your accusations that this was ""mean-spirited attack."" In fact, you're completely missing the big picture here - that Aeon1006 completely and unquestionably violated the trust of his client and turned against the very person he had promised to help. " +Fragility V2.0 Article needs to be created ( ) +":Well, not many lately. I've not had the time really to devote to a ""proper"" GA review of an article, so I mostly check recent additions to see if they can be ""quick-failed"" (e.g., if they have no references or if they have a cleanup template, etc.). No sense in having an article hang out on the list for a month or more if it's got no chance of passing. That's what originally brought me to the above article, but since it's not a quick-fail candidate, I did some minor copyediting and moved on. ) (klaT) " +Persistent disruptive editing Please note that User 118.127.68.110 has returned to making unacceptable reversions at Burleigh Smith following a recent temporary block. Cheers, +" No, I don't think that's a good idea. X11 Magenta is completely different from the meaning of ""magenta"" for centuries before. I think the X11 guys needed a name for FF00FF, and just picked ""magenta"" as the first thing they could think of. I agree it's good to have a source, but the X11 colors aren't a very good source for this, IMO. We could try converting 100% magenta ink color (maybe like from some SWOP CMYK space) to sRGB using ColorSync or some other CMM, and then source that as the color for ""Magenta"". But really this is a reason that I don't like swatches for such articles: ""Magenta"" doesn't refer to a particular color, so much as a range of colors. jacobolus (t) " +Plot was much too long, detailed and subjective, reading motivations and meanings into the movie where none are explicit. I've condensed the movie into a brief synopsis, I don't believe a scene by scene relating of the entire movie is necessary or appropriate. This seems to be a real problem with movies, over-detailed plots which often add the editors' POV and biases. I think a short synopsis is much less likely to suffer from this problem. +So in other words, WP is so riddled with troll assholes such as yourself that you refuse to make any sensible distinction between a REAL hypothesis that is tested by science and a pseudo-hypothesis that you get from your fringe misunderstandings of this topic. 50.72.139.25 +" Thanks for the heads up. Might you be able to tell me where it's used? I speak a little Spanish and was able to work my thru your site, but I haven't found it yet. ~ ''''''«talkstalk» " +Hard to find a decent source. How about this? +Actually, my response was to satirize how weak debators often find a trivial exception to a statement without considering its intent/purpose (i.e. intentionally missing the main point). +Neutrality header Do we need the whole transcript? The record of the ruling itself is fine. If required, add an external link to the website where it is held. I've added a header showing that the facts in this article are not agreed upon. Are we all happy now? 08:26, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) +although it be useful to add some of the other sources I mentioned +Hey, welcome to my user talk page, if you would like to talk to me or make a new friend don't hesitate to leave a comment. If you are an administrator i'd appreciate being unblocked, being unable to contribute constructivley to Wikipedia for over a month has taught me a lesson. i have been so desperate that i even joined Uncyclopedia. +Plz stop your half knowledge edits == Hello Sitush, Please analyse the fellow wiki author edits and then say that they are nonsense. It clearly seems you are senseless relating to Telugu communities and yourself have added non related stuff in Rajus page. Plase stop your senseless edits and discuss if u have any knowledge on those points. == +new users I disagree, but I've had a similar conversation in the past wherein I made a number of compromises, giving links to varius newbie pages. It took me a (seemed to me to be anyway) long time to figure out what was going on here on the wiki. While Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers is fine, and the Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Help desk links are good, they need to know what the mailing list is, and how to handle a dispute, etc... as well. I guess I disagree w your general complaint, but I am open to some specific suggestions, particularly if they don't involve shortening my list of links (which I get copious compliments on btw, have a look at my talk page archives). [Spade] 17:06, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC) +-reposted by A98.. 98.92.185.15 +School location: London or Surrey? There's been an amusing tit-for-tat re-edit of the location of Whitgift School as a result of user Samtheboy mistakenly believing that the school is in the county of Surrey. Without wishing to sound like an anorak, this Greater London vs. the 'old' county boundaries around London is a bit of an old chestnut. Significant changes in local government in the 1960s and 70s (the result of the inexorable spread of suburban London) meant that towns like Croydon, Kingston and Bromley in the south were swallowed up by London, becoming the London Borough of Croydon, etc. One old county - Middlesex - disappeared altogether. Confusingly, the Post Office retained the old names, disregarding the new borough locations, and to this day people in places like Thornton Heath believe they live in Surrey - a fact which couldn't be further from the truth. The same is true of south Croydon, which is in the London Borough of Croydon and hence Greater London. The county of Surrey begins further down the road and the local council taxpayers, commercial ratepayers and other residents of south Croydon pay their taxes, have their roads repaired and their refuse collected by the local London borough. I suppose the reaction is: who cares? But if Wikipedia has pretentions to accuracy, we should get these things right. Nowhere will Samtheboy or anyone else find any accurate evidence that Whitgift school is in Surrey because the simple fact is that it is not. End of sermon. +Actually, the universe only has one set of laws. It's just that under different conditions, different portions of the laws become the dominant force. Scientists tend to simplify things by only using and studying those portions of the laws that are dominant for any given set of conditions. This leads to the appearance that quantum physics, Newtonian physics, and general relativity are three different sets of laws. +" This person is at least somewhat notable. Note that he had a red link from Leonia, New Jersey for over a year, before he wrote his own article. So someone else thought he was notable too. I've redone this article a bit, so taken off that ""auto"" tag. " +Deleted page CRJ You recently deleted the article CRJ following a G11 request, the G11 request followed a complete change of content on the same day it was nominated. I intend to restore the prior version but just thought it was polite to notify you first. +don't u dear delete my page again alrite u nigger +I found it quite appalling that you deleted my article about Catalin Dragomir. I was a piece of research that took hour and effort to compile, yet your vile assumption is that we advertise. We asked permission to write about this architect. Can you please restore this article ASAP. Mihai Sima +":::No, you said both earlier and now, that anarcho-capitalism was ""conflated"" with anarchism. In fact, what Molinari wrote about is anarchism (but Molinari's anarchism was not acknowleged as such until Rothbard publicized it in the 1960s.) Molinari didn't call it ""anarchism"" himself, because he associated the term with his contemporary, Pierre Proudhon, and socialism. " +I am not an administrator and this is the job for others, ALSO I DO NOT APPRECIATE YOU ARE REVERTING OTHER LINKS, NOT ONLY VIDEO. Stay away, because I am here to stay and stop you from vandalizing this page, as long as it takes. You have no manners and you simply create your own truth. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eazy-E. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Date incorrect? In the first paragraph it states that Gadhafi abolished the constitution in 1951. Was he 9 years old when this happened? Is this a typo that should read 1971? Jeffery C. Zimmerman +210.5.95.168 Excuse me, I did not do anything to the Paladine_(Dragonlance) page, I have never even seen it before! +notice please see this notice: +You're watching Dirty Jobs too I guess? Haha... +>Everything that is on Wikipedia article space has to be by consensus/policy.Dully noted>The hadith that you tried to remove is about a slave that was freed.No, the hadith I removed was about a wife that didn't give her uncle a gift in which Muhammad told her you can, it has no basis on manumission of slaves or not, Muhammad alredy encouraged manumission with the evidence I brought forth.>We have a consensus to retain that and to keep the section title neutral.I agree but saying manumission makes no sense, it is either encouraged or discouraged.>There's no reason to have any further discussion on any of this since the consensus is clear.I have yet to see a reason a VALID one why giving gifts to your uncle is constituted as manumission??? >You can continue to talk here all you want but I don't think anyone is going to reply further because it's just repetitious at this point, and that wastes everyone's time.It's waste everyone who doesn't know the hadith, this is simply a herd mentality, and as I have told you before the people who started the edit warring were people stalking me and following me. There is no way Wikipedia can't have tyranny of the majority, would a 1+1=3 need a consensus? Surely there can exist a consensus from editors who have knowledge in this area and not people who have a dog against me like Jeppiz and Tip. +" Hi made all your problems disappear in under 4 minutes. No wasting time now over ""Importance"", or in yet another Edit Bore (yaaaaawn). With h/er elegant problem solving, the problem is now unmoot. That's how our problems should be solved around here, I think. - Thanks again and Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ " +what others think http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080804220345AAzEwcK +Useless section The international reactions section is really nonsensical, it should be removed. 175.110.222.144 +Unencyclopedic tag What are the reasons for the unencyclopedic tag? Is this referring to the Fashion or Sexuality section? In my opinion, neither subject falls under the category of what Wikipedia is not, and the tag should be removed or changed to a more appropriate template. +He got what he deserved for wrecking Wikipedia with his so-called Abuse Filter. +. i.e. I won't give up +PLus LWT, you have no ideer what you are talking about I think you just see yourself in JoshuaZ ROFL ahahahahahahahaha +Looking at your contributions, you're not exactly eligible to talk about what sources are reliable for wikipedia. It seems all of your edits are of bad faith. Maybe one should get a life and stop editing an already discredited (because of people like you) encyclopaedia from multiple accounts. +This section is important not only because Li is no longer giving interviews but also because it provides answers to many questions that the public is interested in. Why are you so uncomfortable about what your master has said? If you guys are truly about truthfulness why do you guys want to conceal information like this to the public? I don’t think you are a true follower of Li; I think you are one of those people who are helping Li to fool his followers and the public for money or whatever reason. I have noticed that there are two kinds of people in the Falun Gong. While most of them have no problem with Li’s statements, some of them, like you, are uncomfortable which shows that you are not a true follower of Li. +The disbandment and regrouping is noted in the info box, but their history simply ends with the original disbandment on this page. Someone needs to write about MaxNormal.TV and Die Antwoord. +Sorry kid, but its out. Even if it has a reference, bring your theories elsewhere. +" What exactly are you questioning? The checkuser data showed that these users were editing from the same computer over the same timeframe. (//c) " +Carry out discussion on relevant pages +Multiculturalist sock puppet== Someone just admitted that multiculturalist is their sockpuppet account, check the BNP talk page. == +put some political soapbox- can some one fix it? alos it appaers that the article is being rapidly vandalized +"==Temporarily blocked== This bot is temporarily blocked, you will need to either seek local approval or global approval before requesting unblock. –xenotalk " +Leave My Damn User-Page & Talk-Page Alone STOP MAKING CHANGES TO MY USER PAGE AND TALK PAGE!!! What is your problem? Seriously P.S. Stop stalking me by reverting all of my work and just because you're some loser who has to follow me around undoing all my work to try and get back at me some how for some reason I don't know of. +" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Albert Sabin. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) " +FlightAware's website was used as sources in several other areas in the article by several other people. FlightAware's information is all automated and is accurate, since it is reported directly by the air traffic control computers. Wikipedia's advice on using primary sources is that they are allowed, but if a secondary source is available (which it isn't in this case) to use that instead. +This is a question: Since it is not easily dissolved in water, what is KCal absorbed by a human body from wheat Bran? +"OK, FYI to everyone. When you don't register w/ Wikipedia, it automatically assigns you a username. This username is yoru IP Address. Everyone who uses the same server (Such as AOL or Netscape) get the same address. So these accusations of vandalism are being directed at every single person who is unregistered and uses AOL or Netscape, like one big common mailbox. So if you haven't vandalized, the message is obviously not directed at you. See warning provided by Wikipedia: ""Attention: This IP address is registered to America Online (AOL) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking."" " +" User:Nishadhi, Yes, it is only natural that you will have to find 'problems' if it doesn't correspond with your way of wanting things to be. And I didn't mean the delay, I did not check this page out since the last time my edit was reverted(somewhat modified by User:JJ, thankfully) and I had no idea I was the one probably asked for such a thing, until I saw it on my talk page. Anyway never mind now that I'am here: For the first source Manokaran, which has quite a heck of content, I suggest you probably be looking for pages between 22-50, with special emphasis on p26, thats what the wording on the article is. There seems to be some problem with rgetting to the second source(the link seems to be broken) and anyway I'am unable to access Google Books momentarily. I'll get back sooner on that. The third source has content regarding the subject from p247-p260. Hope that was all expected of me. My apologies for your difficulties and inconvenience that may have been caused. Greetings. (talk . contr . mail) " +excuse me i am the author of the freeston chronicles and have sold many copies. mr johnson is a reccuring villain throughout. my article isnt nonesense. +Puppy'. (On the contrary, in fact, it clearly states: My WP:PA's offensive metaphors disgracefully exploited the canine imagery on your page and your styling yourself as 'Puppy'.) The unblock request +Daniel, I would like to excerise my right to vanish for this account and start over with a new one. +) That'd be cool, but what really needs a picture is Hicks's article. 02:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC +You run into surprises, sometimes. I was somewhat surprised to find that Julie von Massow, who started a worldwide (well...) prayer movement in the 19th century, didn't have an article, not even on the German wiki. I gotta say, though, your article looks really nice too, and I envy you! Later, +thanks for the advice, thats the way i like it (na na na) +" Speedy deletion of HarmonieShadow Priest A tag has been placed on HarmonieShadow Priest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Talk here! " +" Your submission at AfC Medical Device Reprocessing was accepted Medical Device Reprocessing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! (talk) " +OMG, 'I dispute the gayness of this discussion!' OMG, what a bunch of fucking nerds!! Not only are your arguments weak and impractical, but youactually seem to take yourselves seriously! My recommendation: BUY SALT BITCHES!!!! LOL!! Stupid Gay Bitches!!! +" I am the primary review of the article. In addition, to the above. I have the following concerns: ""meridian west poleward to the 30th parallel north in the northeast Pacific ocean and the 31st parallel north in the northern Atlantic ocean."" why are Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean linked? E Pacific Hurricane ""All Hurricanes (CARCAH) unit tasks planes, for research and operational purposes, to tropical cyclones during the Atlantic hurricane season and significant weather events, including snow storms, during winter and spring."" um, they also fly into EPAC storms. E Pacific Hurricane ""the center issues the appropriate watches and warnings via the news media and NOAA Weather Radio."" Spell out NOAA. E Pacific Hurricane "" has designated it as Regional Specialized Meteorological Center for the North Atlantic and eastern Pacific"" please tell me why these common terms are linked. E Pacific Hurricane There is one dab link in the history section. E Pacific Hurricane ""On July 1, 1956, a National Hurricane Information Center had become established in Miami, Florida which became a warehouse for all hurricane-related information from one United States Weather Bureau office.[8] "" why is the state mention and change ""had become"" to ""was"". Thank you. E Pacific Hurricane ""before reassuming its National Hurricane Center name on October 1, 2010.[25] During this time frame, the Hurricane Specialists were grouped as a separate NHC unit under the Tropical Prediction Center,[24] separating themselves from the Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch. On October 1, 2010, the Tropical Prediction Center was renamed the NHC,[25]"" you mention the name change twice. E Pacific Hurricane ""The World Meteorological Organization continues to create and maintain the annual hurricane naming lists. Naming lists continue to use a six-year rotation, with the deadliest or most notable storms having their names retired from the rotation. The current director of the National Hurricane Center is Richard Knabb."" source? E Pacific Hurricane "" Richard Knabb (2012–)[37] "" why is he wikilinked twice? ""The budget for the NHC is $6.8 million annually (2008 fiscal year funding).[28] "" any newer data and suggest re-wording to ""In 2008, the annual budget for the NHC is $6.8 million"". E Pacific Hurricane ""Known as the NHC from 1995 through 2010, t"" you said TPC earlier IIRc. E Pacific Hurricane ""The specialists coordinate with officials in each country likely to be affected. They forecast and recommend watches and warnings"" source? E Pacific [[Special:Contributions/Yellow_Ev +" Can we phrase it that the ""Telegraph believes/states/quotes..."" etc? I can see the logic of using enough gas/smoke units to burn it down. Did we ever get an RS as to which version they used and the operating temperature? It reminds me of a tale about a straw house, a stick house, and a brick one. I think the brick house was the only one that survived. " +Thankyou. Atleast some around here have common sense. — Dunc|☺ +Edited for Brevity? It appears that the merge discussion has been made moot by some zealous editing. I think it would be wise to avoid gutting this article, as it will probably be needed once the Neo-Fascism article exceeds ideal length. Hopefully we can get this all sorted out without a whole lot more trouble. +" Commenting on the evidence, I would like to assert which were done by me and which were not (I don't really know what to do, or what I can do, in these sort of situations, so this is all I can offer right now). Evidence 1,3,4, and 5 were done by me, and evidence 2,6, and 7 were not. Evidence 1 was me making an edit (logged in) to the page Aang, as I often make small edits to pages I am familiar with. Evidence 2 was not me, as I do not use profanity. Evidence 3 was me (logged in) following the guidelines given to me as I faced a block message, and the aforementioned guidelines were to paste a link on my page to remove the block. Now this is where I am a bit confused. Evidence 4 was me (NOT logged in) removing the Welcome! template that was on my user page, but I did this a few weeks ago (I believe that date listed is July 25). I removed it because I felt I no longer needed it and generally dislike it when my page is not edited by me, which I assume led to Evidence 5. Evidence 5 was me (logged in) removing the Unblocked message from my page, and although I do not know what ""snarky"" is (I hope it isn't an insult), I removed the template, again, because I generally dislike it when other people edit my page (I understand that in this situation the edit to my page was to alert me of the unblock, but I was assuming that message would be sent via inbox rather than a direct edit). As for Evidence 6 and 7, I am not user Hermanthegerman66, and I would guess that IP 24.7.247.203 is also Hermanthegerman66 but not at the library. This is all I know to do right now, hope it helps. Again, apologies for any inconveniences." +DYK on Melhus church Looks like it got in OK this time, using the Alt hook. +It was a military victory, but a strategic defeat. The infobox reflects this. +Thank you robot. At least you're reasonable and like me. +" Large litters are typical in areas where fox mortality is high. Kits are born blind, deaf and toothless, with dark brown fluffy fur. At birth, they weigh 56-110 g and measure 14.5 cm in body length and 7.5 cm in tail length." +":*While this has nothing to do with systematic bias, but one could make the argument that every fatwa issued by Al-Azhar is important by virute of it being ""an important Islamic university"". If anything, this should be used as a redirect if its not deleted. Comment. I wouldn't want to see an article for every fatwa, but this one, in which Shia Islam is recognised as a valid form of Islam by Sunni scholars is important. It shows that extremist Sunni/Salafi hostility to the Shia is not supported by one of the more imporatant Sunni institutions. Content already existing as mentioned above, hence Delete as an unlikely search term. " +Thank you for the reply. Your rating of Start implies that this article has just started and needs (in your opinion) much work to improve. Please explain. I am not aware of your checklist and your list of specific shortcomings of the article. Please be specific about the areas that you believe need work - - - better yet, please provide constructive edits for others to consider. +Hello . It's curious. I thought you might just be a bit paranoid so I checked. made about 33 edits on WP beginning on 10 April 2005 and ending 6 June 2005. With the exception of two edits regarding Pound sterling articles and a few edits to his own User page every other edit was only to the Jehovah's Witnesses page and its Talk page. User began editing on 10 June 2005. 21 of 22 edits are to the Jehovah's Witnesses page or its Talk page. You were right! That guy's out of control!!! 8 July 2005 07:00 (UTC) +" btw, congee is a chinese rice dish totally different from rice we're talking about. And ""rice"" is used plenty of times too. Try googling it if you want to make sure. " +are served by what trains +" Re: your message I'm really not sure how to do that... I'll have to experiment for a while first. T " +" Opposition, Criticism, or Anti- With the exception of Islam, most major religions have ""Anti-"". For example, Anti-Judaism, Anti-Catholicism, Anti-Protestantism, Criticism of Islam, Criticism of Mormonism. The problem with the title ""Opposition to Mormonism"" is that it is tooo POV. Opposition to illegal drugs, opposition to racisim, ok. How POV can you get about the pros and cons of racism? LoL. The only diehard opponents to Mormonism are other Christians. The old title assumes that all people are opposed to the religion, or that few people question reasons for its opposition, which is just not true. " +]] and have not been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please do not use the sandbox. Thank you. +Hi. I was looking at IPs recently blocked for spamming; I was reviewing them to see if their domains also needed blacklisting. +" It is your opinion, and hey good for you, that Kosovo is an independent country and nothing else. And that the only reason it would be presented as disputed would be that ""wikipedia is a little bit afraid of Russo-Serbian reactions."" That's your opinion...and honestly that second part is ridiculous. Anyway, the first part of your opinion that Kosovo is a country and ""nothing else"" is simply not based in any facts, and is not a view held world wide. As Wikipedia is an Encylcopeida, and it is not your personal soapbox the article will present the prevailing world views in a neutral manner. And when you take those into account, Kosovo is very much a disputed territory. As WP:WWIN suggests, perhaps you should start a blog, where you can present your opinion without fear of having to remain neutral. That is, of course, unless you are the one who fears ""Russo-Serbian reactions."" ;) " +" hey buddy, hey buddy, guess what? ""I"" dont care realy what ""your"" excuse is, and couldn't care less what Roaringflamer says, but you are obviously obsessed with redirects. If there is anybody that should be banned, its you for vandalism and disruption so there" +And good day to you Irvine who ever you are. More work on Dunmanway has been done. +]] again. We don't use Mr, Mrs, Ms, or Miss in infoboxes unless the gender is not obvious. See WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#IB. Your change of the teacher ratio is not sourced, and you changed my sourced number without changing the valid, cited ref. You cannot change a properly cited piece of information and claim that it came from the same reference. If you have a different, better source, then use it. Otherwise leave the number alone. Furthermore, you should be using valid edit summaries. You claimed that many of your edits were typo corrections when they were clearly not. +hunk YOU'VE BEEN HIT BY THE BEAUTIFUL truck ONCE YOU'VE BEEN HIT, YOU HAVE TO HIT 8 Beautiful People IF YOU GET HIT AGAIN YOU'LL KNOW YOU'RE REALLY BEAUTIFUL! IF YOU BRAKE THE CHAIN, YOU'LL BE CURSED WITH UGLYNESS FOR 10 YEARS SO PASS IT HIT WHO EVER YOU THINK IS BEAUTIFUL! +" Ah, I didn't know about that, thank you! Talk " +REDIRECT User talk:Tony Tan 98 +Well said. Henry Stapp put some great arguments refuting the objections in this page in several encyclopedia-worthy tomes. I'll work on adding them in the future, too. +The History Channel is wrong. Please see Talk:Lethal injection#1982 vs 1983 and the sources given that correctly state that it happened in 1982. In particular see the New York Times article about the execution from December 7, 1982. ∴Hello +Scope needed There may be a need to split this off into various outlines. This is mostly political and/or military history at the moment, so perhaps it should be retitled. There's some content on arts and culture in Western civilization, that could be a separate outline. Just speculating, since there could eventually be more material added to the outline as it stands, than would be manageable to work with. I also notice that economic history is very neglected in the current outline, that might be more useful to readers if it is a standalone outline. Just what I'm thinking, anyway. Anyone else have any thoughts? +6) I took Terri to Mediplex in Bradenton Fla, a residential rehab facility that specializes in brain injuries. specializes in brain injuries? They dont claim that on their web site. It is a physical therapy place. Is it equal to, say, Shands Hospital in Gainsville? +do as you say faggot. you're talkin shit about me so now i am about you +Currently, the amount of constructive edits are outweighing the rubbish. 212.219.59.241 +Of others don't have to do that, I don't have to do that. Stop the discriminating this once. +Model Year Does anybody know what they're planning on doing after the 2009 model year, when the alphanumeric space for that runs out? +Anti-Americanism Thank you for testing out Wikipedia. Please be advised that material added must be properly sourced and correctly formatted. Major changes to articles should be discussed on their talk pages. You can check out WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:MOS for more details. +" So, politely I ask an honest administrator to remove this sensless block. " +In exactly what way is that a summary? +No. In it's current state it should be left up until you can find evidence against it. Cotroversy DOES exist with his role as Sonic. You shouldn't need a source for that. Ask any Sonic fan who has played all or most of the games in the series. Or maybe we could take a poll. +" Slim: The term ""right-wing think tanks"", is treated as a generic noun. I would suggest this can be improved to something less devisive and inflamitory. Thank you. " +Perhaps it’s worth starting a list of Jewish terms and including Yetzer harah there. +George Carlin Hey man, before I reverted I checked the news and didn't see news of his death. It's OK. +I'm scared. It resets daily. Fuck you and your Zionist buddies. I will continue to edit this page in GOOD FAITH until I get bored battling Jewbotts. +" Ah not particularly, if you could find some more information on diagnosis or prognosis then that'd be grand! Thanks a lot ) Regards, ''''''Talk? " +be good material for a longer discussion in the main text, as first paragraph before discussing subfields of economics. +Cool, thanks; I added a minor correction. +chickenshit vikie-addict. you are a liar about your service. you are not missed. +FrankTobia, I am sorry to say, but when you say the debt can be paid off you are, in fact wrong, because of one and only one thing, the application of interest by the federal reserve that is applied to the only money printed and in circulation. So that fact being true in all terms, The debt will never be able to be repaid to that which is the Federal Reserve Bank. If the debt were repaid, the money would cease to exist leaving no value in the monetary system. Frank, im sorry to say that the only banking book that is a valued resource is the book Modern Money Mechanics written in 1913 by the Federal Reserve Bank. Also, if you look at the shareholders of each Fed Bank they will all lead back to the same people, mostly located in Europe. By saying that the federal reserve bank/system does not work for profit, yet they apply interest to all loans derived from them as a source is really denying that you are credible in any way, and im not saying this as an insult, but the only reason of interest to be applied IS to make a PROFIT. Feel free to reply to this at any time or email me at randomrd@gmail.com, I will be copying this and reposting it daily to prevent editing. +" 2012 THE END OF HUMAN HISTORY On this day 12/21/2012 will be a momentus day in the history of our planet and our civilization. We will finally learn that humans are not alone in this universe and it will be discovered in a tremendous fasion. We will learn that this universe is much more than anyone ever imagined, we will shed the ""god"" myths of this world and know for the first time that humans are one of many species in this universe, not just our galaxy but the whole of the universe. The hate and war and injustices created by ""mans"" religion will be over, the discovery will transport humans to another level never before imagined, technology will advance far beyond what we believed capable. This will be a time of fear for many, losing ones ""god"" and finding out that it was all man made will create those that refuse to move forward and experience the true meaning of our existance. Many will try to impede our elevation to join the community of the universe and will try to attempt to demonize the truth and stop all of us from the truth. Many of humanity will choose to leave this world behind and travel to the stars in search of science, truth, logic and reason leaving those to their fate on planet Earth." +I call bullshit on that! Either behave or I will formally ask you to stay the fuck off my talk page. The original date I removed had no source and the one I replaced it with seemed to come from the person themselves. You weasel added a google link for Jan Mak‎ 1948. I edited it to Jan Mak‎ 1945 and you whined like a baby. Of course your google link will match your POV in this case. I also feel you are very COI in this issue being an avid soccer fan. If you can't behave like an admin at least behave like a responsible editor and stop power-tripping with your status to win your edit wars with your POV, COI, and OR. +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vani_Hari#The_lead I have replaced the content and added SOURCES as requested. I do not appreciate being threatened by your or Vani Hari's IP address sockpuppet. +" First, we need to know about what he testified. Then we can discuss that in the context of his qualifications. Otherwise, we are going in circles. If, as Negrete claimed, he testified about psychiatry, then his lack of passing the psychiatry boards would be relevant. Otherwise, it really isn't. Also, I noted on Tim Bolan's website that Barrett shouldn't even be called ""Doctor"" because he is no longer licensed. That is absurd. Once he has an M.D. degree he can forever call himself Doctor if he so chooses. The status of his license has nothing to do with it - even if he had had it revoked, which does not appear to be the case. " +clearly has no life. Who actually spends all there tme on wikipedia. Deadset bussy, you must have no life. +There you go that is some Tanjug type of explanation, or explanation found in the pamphlets of Serbian socialist or radical party. Horrible. +Eurodistrict Hello J, as i said i won't have time personally to enhance the article the next days, but here is a link to a website featuring several articles on the Eurodistrict: http://www.relatio-europe.eu/strasbourg-europe/eurodistrict. Cheers, +Okay I agree it isn't a Pop song but I would call it Pop-Rock or Pop-Punk. Somebody keeps changing the genre to 'Punk Rock'...not only is that completely wrong but it also makes them look extremely foolish. Please stop changing the genre to 'Punk Rock' whoever it is. +Lenore Skenazy edit I posted factual information that is referenced. If it's against your viewpoint, then that's too bad. Wikipedia is not based on your viewpoint, but the truth. If your personal feelings override the mission of the website, then it's time you stopped editing. +The project page was in rather bad condition due to real life / wikibreak issues on my side. Thank you for working on it! I've done some CAT:PNTs already. For the organization of the Berlin meetup, I won't be much help: just pick a cafe/pub you like and we'll go there... (討論) +"::::I bet the Emperor was descended from the Zombie Elk. On another note: You 'get time'? Jeeze, how on Earth do you manage to achieve that one, then? I have been trying to 'get time' for ages! Ta for that lovely comment about my learning rate o) As a WikiWolfcub, I have been incredibly fortunate to find an adopter with outstanding leadership skills in Montanabw, which has helped. I am also an obsessive-compulsive-learner-of-things, which I guess also helps, lol! I know you don;t go in for user boxes on your page, but as I have to consider you to be a joint-adopter, maybe you could make an exception and add the ""I adopted a WikiWolfcub"" to your page o) I feel that your heroic/angelic efforts in Cub-training deserve recognition - and I am truly thankful for all the help you've provided to me " +"==Origin of the article== I removed this from the article: ""Article originally created by Alistair Siddons, who has completed a major study of the Chemetco criminal case and history of environmental violations."" " +72 virgins Some editors are trying this merge this article. Could you voice your opinion here onthis matter? Thanks: Talk:72_Virgins#Merge.3F (talk•contribs) +If a person has right to comment at any page then it does not mean he stars torturing other under the umbrella of policy and legality. There is something called 'Ethics' and 'Conscience' to motivate you to be fair. And the allegation you are conversely making against me that I visit those users where you visit? I only visited those user pages who were participating in the mediation and talk pages related to the article of Muhammad (SAW). So I happed to see your comments there too. But I did not exclusive chase and throw a lame comment at the end of your every post, like you did. Calling you a kid? Thats rightly justified, because I infered about your mindset so I refered you some video documentaries made by your own American fellows, but you simply rejected and alleged that I am trying to convert you? If I would like to show you the truth about your religion then I had better videos of comparative religions which I did not refer you just because of the allegations you could make against me, but you made allegations anyway. +" Dates You have been making a number of unsourced, unexplained edits. On wikipedia, all content, in theory, should be verifiable. When you change the years of historical events without a citation, I cannot tell if you are making a good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, or if you are simply being disruptive and adding false information. In the future, if you are going to change the year a historical event occurred, you must supply a citation to back up your change. Also, please start using the ""edit summary"" box every time you edit, and explain briefly what you changed (and why if necessary). If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask and I'll try my best to help you you. Good luck.- [talk] " +" Again, I have reverted the 'link correction' by the ""anonymous"" user. Reasoning of the revert above here. Nothing more to say... " +" ""not bow to your demands""? Are you an Islamophobe by any chance RaseaC ? I'm not Muslim but even I recognize the Muslim peoples sensibilities. The way you say ""not bow to your demands"" shows your hatred of Muslims and Islam since the topic has nothing to do with ""bow""ing to anyone's demands. This isn't an ""us vs them"" issue. Its about respect, tolerance and being sensible. Things which you seem to lack. Good day. " +I do think that is heavily biased and that accusations as given are baseless. My all contributions are strictly supported by valid references and claim that 'everyone has finally gotten sick of you' is generic, baseless, and offensive. +":::::Not good faith? This from the editor who offers no evidence whatsoever and claims I'm ""making this up as I go"" even though I'm doing exactly what WP:COMMONNAME asks? WP:AGF, dude. Just because you're losing doesn't mean it's unfair. " +" Fact check needed I need someone to check me on the time frame in which Cantor formulated limitation of size. Was it really after the discovery of Cantor's paradox, as my text in the article implies? Once this is resolved, please remove the following code from the ""Work"" section of the article: ''[[Talk:Georg Cantor#Limitation of size|fact check needed]]'' Thanks, " +RIP The wikipedia community has lost one of its most shining members, rest in peace. Oh, dear, what comfort can I find?' None this tide, Nor any tide, Except he did not shame his kind My Boy Jack (1916), Rudyard Kipling +Perhaps the material could be incorporated in other articles. The material in DUI Arrests: Alcoholic Beverage might be better placed here, for example. +Unblock I was blocked due to two users with obvious bias deleting my edits. They were going to the web sight more than I was so they should have been prevented. My edits were backed up. Are they going to be blocked from editing? +" Talkback '''''' talk " +U iz a bitch. -Donny's Mom +There seems to be concensus here to keep pages, discussion closed with a consensus to keep. - . +" Additional book Nye has written I'm new to Wikipedia and don't feel comfortable yet editing an article. Could someone with more experience make the following addition please? Joseph S. Nye, Jr. (Joseph Nye) wrote the book ""Nuclear Ethics."" Here are the particulars: Book title: ""Nuclear Ethics."" ISBN # 0029224608. Published by ""The Free Press"" which is a ""Division of Macmillan, Inc."" Copyright 1986. Published 1986. Agatecat2700 " +" Talk:Nariman Mehta Thank you reviewing and critiquing the Nariman Mehta article. Would you mind elaborating on your ideas on "" living bibliographies "" for this article. Being a newbie, I am still trying to learn the proper guidelines of Wikipedia. Thank you for your patience. " +" Error in reasoning. Post-Hardcore is perhaps another variant of Hardcore punk, because it cames from Hardcore punk. But if Lacuna Coil was a Gothic METAL band, they cannot be a Post-Gothic ROCK band, because they never played Gothic ROCK. Thus they're a Post-Gothic-METAL band. That's a big stylistical difference. Lacuna Coil's music shows no roots in Post-Punk music (the true origin of Gothic Rock). Their music is a simple variant of ""Alternative Heavy Metal Rock"". " +" Editors as you and me do not decide what it is a ""source"" and what is not. What is a source is defined in Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You do not like ""my"" sources?. I do not like ""yours"" neither. Our liking or disliking of sources, our ""feeling"" about them means nothing in Wikipedia. " +AWWW GO HOME AND CRY TO MUMMY AWAWAWAWAWA SIGNED YOUR BLOODY WORST NIGHTMARE THE TYPEVANDAL +Other users using the proxy have made constructive and helpful edits; please consider this in determining the length of prospective blocks by vandals. +Thanks for screwing up the Lion King family tree! Luckily, I reverted back your halfassed edits. +" You must make the improvements to the article here on your talk page before being unblocked. talk " +Done. Perhaps a list to include items (Talon Mercs / 10mm sub) is usefull? +" Una, I have (I hope) fixed this. Talk " +:DaniWeb A tag has been placed on DaniWeb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Accept my apology! Accept my apology THIS MINUTE you big, fat noob (this is doughnuthead talking,and if you don't think so, tough.)78.144.87.71 +" references in the lead in? It seems highly unusual to have references in the lead in. After all, the lead in is just a condensed version of the article, and presumably, any point in the lead in will be covered properly in the article itself. buddytalk " +" Barnstar The Original Barnstar For all your help getting article up to WP:GA and WP:FA, I hereby award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work hobby! Basketball110 ''''''/Tell me yours BTW, my desktop background is this. I noticed you nominated it for FP, and it got the status. Again, keep up the great work! Basketball110 ''''''/Tell me yours " +" Elimination ""if not all, ""fad diets."" There is a (sometimes confusing) multitude of weight loss techniques, many of which are ineffective"" Eliminated the above sentence from the article as it expresses an opinion about diets as being ineffective." +" MLK incident It's true that Greenberg said what he said. It's true that a Chicago Sun Times blog reported what he said. Those two facts, in and of themselves, do not make the MLK incident ""relevant"" to his ESPN career. The fact that there was no meaningful followup coverage in reliable sources should establish that. Alleging that Greenberg's comment was a Freudian slip simply because he has mentioned making such slips requires a citation from a reputable source establishing that he said he makes Freudian slips. I'll assume good faith on the part of the IP editor who has been reinserting the MLK incident, but I strongly question the relevance of including what appears to be a simple spoonerism, even if it has racial connotations. " +BIGGEST JERK ON EARTH!= IS AN ASSHOLE! FUCK HIM RIGHT IN THE EYE! +as one of the notable representatives of +" I believe the problems have been remedied. Thanks for your help on this. rawr =^_^= " +You're all fags for trying to delete this article. Go kill yourselves instead89.123.100.99 God Al-fucking-mighty +I'll be sure they get a third report on this editor, Mr. Holder has done nothing but revert good faith edits and cause a shit storm since he joined this site. 71.72.160.144 +":Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza84's page about +I do not understand what I said that was not constructive. +don't bring controversial issue Hey you seem to bring controversial Bhote issues into fragile Nepali society. Due to people like you and your dirty politics, Nepali communities have many problems. If you really admire Bhotes then why don't you go back to Bhot and help them. Why are you trying to divide Yolmo People. Again Yolmos are not related to Tibetans, only some are. Yolmo are ethnically Nepalis(Gurkhas). Your grandfather might have have come to Nepal to from Bhot, but it doesn't mean you are a true Nepali. Yolmo people have problems because guys like you bring different bhote things in the name of dharma. I think you are a disciple of Shyama Rinpoche. how much money you receive from him to divide Yolmos? Nowadays people like you have fully integrated into Nepal by purchasing lots of property in Nepal, this doesn't mean you are a Nepali. At last you are always a Goo Bhote. So goo bhote bo back to Bhot and worship Shyama rinpoche, drink lots of Bhote tea, tea chauri but please, i beg you don't divide yolmo people of Nepal. and yolmos are nepali and have nothing to do with Bhot. I know you are putting bhote issue into yolmo because you wanted to have the reader feel that yolmos are bhotes. +"Oh, I corrected your grammar aswell, ""You're"" welcome. " +It does though make me feel a lot better. As I don't have to listen to pearls of wisdom, from a user who was banned for six months for posing as an administrator. +Michael W. Shields I've declined your speedy - it's the same person but not the same article. I think there's enough there to pass A7, too. +- This article states that his father was black and his mother was Irish. Can it be changed to 'his father was (insert correct country of ethnic origin here) and his mother was Irish' OR 'his father was black and his mother was white'. Otherwise it seems like lumping all 'black' people/cultures/nations together, in direct contrast to the detail of nationality given on the (presumably) white mother's heritage. - +Oppose. A move to inconsistency would be a bad thing in this case, but I do feel that 1) the sheep article could be improved by highlighting more strongly that it's not about domestic sheep (and that there is a difference), and 2) some sections in domestic sheep need to be moved to the parent article. The current arrangement works for me. ≡ talk +Also keep in mind: At aphelion (furthest from the Sun) Sedna has an apparent magnitude of about 35. Sedna is much closer, larger, and brighter than most Oort cloud objects. +Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisiana State University rugby +Help How can I have the alt text changed on the wiki logo on the top left? +" I have reverted this move. The discussion was not announced on the article, so regular contributors had no idea it was happening. If you check the archive, you'll see that there has been non-consensus moves in the past, and extensive discussion without consensus. Now, the current name may not be great, and I'm not going to defend it at all costs, but it is the name the BBC originally used for the episode, and the name this article was created with. We've had suggestions over changing ""row"" suggestions over changing ""telephone"" and suggests that ""Brand"" should not be mentioned at all. So far we've had no consensus. I'm happy with a move, but can we have discussion on this talk page and a consensus BEFORE it is moved. RM is really not the place to discuss the renaming of an active article - best to discuss here with those who have/are working here. " +, 2 July 2008 (UTC) The article concerns homeopathy in general and so we must necessarily discuss this as we decide what to say. My comments relate to the content of our lede and so are quite proper. Since your own paragraph above is of a similar nature, your stricture is impertinent and hypocritical. Since such hectoring is uncivil and the article is on probation, please desist from such disruption lest you be sanctioned. For avoidance of doubt, let me be clear that my point is that our lede should not talk of fundamental scientific principles as it does. This is an improper synthesis which does not belong here. 13:50 +" There are some in the LCMS who are opposed to scouting, and instead operate a separate ""Ranger/Rangerette"" program. The WELS are not the only ones. Boy Scouts prohibit Trinitarian statements (as they would make the non-Trinitarians in the group antagonized.) are also have a large number of Mormons active in the leadership. " +An editor should be careful and specific about which edits are thought to be not NPOV before reverting another editor's hard work wholesale. For example, what is not NPOV about stating that Candace was killed at a home in Evergreen and not in Golden? Because it happens to be the geographical location of a lot of leading attachment therapists? The therapists (plural) were not clearly unlicensed, as a reliable source has stated otherwise. It is POV to insist upon mistaken and misleading information be included, especially when the inclusion serves no good purpose. It is a settled question that a reliable source about a topic can be listed in a reading section. Besides, I didn't list it in the first place. The reversion is to a version which is, in my opinion, hopelessly inaccurate, biased and POV. Reversions to that version should stop. +" So now it us Finland-speakers who define the Swedish-speakers ethnicity, as some us see Swedish-speakers as ""others"" in some sense? This is still a bizarre argument, but at least it is a huge improvement compared to Podomi's earlier race-based definition of ethnicity. Compliments. However, the fact remains that all regional, social, linguistic, dialectal etc. identities are not ethnic identities, as ethnicity is a identity-political concept with no neutral or objective existence. All Swedish-speakers in Finland do not share same identity projects.212.146.44.208 " +" Hmm. What do you think of ""...that Taylor Swift wrote all of the songs on her upcoming Speak Now album by herself, including the lead-off single ""Mine""?"" Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • ) " +So what your saying is that Rangers are not something that exist. But something that people just percieve to exist if there are certain assets under the hood of a company functioning together? +" More on changes made to ""Early Soviet Rule and World War II section"" I will not respond to the personal attack directed at ""the person who simply reverted this passage..."". As for the substance of the issue: 1. Reasons of Capital move to Kharkov. ProhibitOnions introduced to the article an idea that one of the reasons of the capital move was the fact Kharkov's was more dominated by ethnic Russians than Kiev. This claim has some logic in the context of the events, but I have not seen this claim made in any serious source. If this is due to my ignorance, I suggest ProhibitOnions provides at least some references, or, if he can't find them off hand, at least gives some hints where he saw this info, so that it can be checked. His statement on the talk page that ""many historians concede"" on this is too vague of a reference. If this is indeed his own speculation based on his interpretation of the logic of events, this qualifies as original research, whose place is current scholary or popular publications, personal web-sites, etc., but not an encyclopedia, which should reflect an established knowledge. 2. Possible role of famine in the capital return to Kiev. PO agrees, that the discussion of the issue belongs to other articles but thinks, it is also relevant here. My point is that this info is factually accurate, but its relevance is too remote. Deliberate killing milions of people was a horrible crime, but Kiev itself, unlike the vast regions of Ukrainian countryside, was not ravaged by famine. Should the info on the deliberate famine caused by the actions of the Bolshevik government be introduced into every article related to any Ukrainian topic? If PO helps me understand why famine should be in Kiev article, I am open to ideas. 3. Finally, PO removed from the article the statement that Kiev growth was mostly caused by migration from other parts of Ukraine which indeed re-established Ukrainian spirit in the city, which is confirmed, for example, by a relative rise of Ukrainian theater and literature in Kiev at the time. He substituted it by the statement about ""the migration from other parts of the Soviet Union."" Where does he get this info? The changes he introduced seem ideological rather that relevant and I reverted them once. Now, I laid out my reasons and will wait for some days for comments rather than reverting this changes right now. Please, no flames. 19:00, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)" +" What right have you give me an ultimatum? I have the right to write true infromace about this country. Why is it on wikipedia sponsored censorship and manipulation of the facts? And then you still have the audacity to threaten someone who writes true, but unfortunately ""politically embarrassing"" information. " +" I emailed BWilkins, asking for an explanation. I'll let him give his, but it appears to me that " +"I remember your Sonic Adventure 2 and MSR lyrics FAQs, and the DC ""6 billion players"" site. Welcome to Wikipedia! ) 20:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)" +Wait, what? How does this work? 65.200.64.163 +GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Ironside/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) Will aim to get to this later in the week. Cheers, +That makes no sense. You don't play MapleStory through Internet Explorer. Sure, the website can only be accessible through IE (well, you can access it through Firefox as well if you know what to do), but it's not really part of the game. +Please see WP:AGF and WP:NPA. The declining reason you gave me is insulting and outrageous. Jasper's comment on the SPI page is not what s/he said about it at all. 2602:306:CE9A:860:49DE:694A:8B2B:71C3 +Note also that the policy does not say to avoid using the word terrorist, but to avoid describing people are terrorists. That is to say that it is fine to give quotations or note accusations by third parties. +"You should not talk of ""misrepresentation"" if your entire ""knowledge"" on the matter stems from online ideological pamphlets, while you wouldn't recognized an academic source if it was shoved in your face. Go and edit some blog, but stop pestering Wikipedia with your naive nonsense. " +" ""The LORD said to Moses, ""Cut two stone tablets like the former, that I may write on them the commandments which were on the former tablets that you broke."" So who's writing the commandments? God. ""And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten words."" Who's writing the covenant? Moses. Sure, you can present an exegesis that results in the conclusion that they are the same. But the plain text of the Bible does not clearly establish that they are the same. That's what I mean by taking the Bible at face value. Exegesis should not be presented as fact. This is an encyclopedia of facts, not of intrepretation. Clearly, you are the one insisting on not being neutral, writing that this is the ""correct"" interpretation and reverting my edit which do not, as you imply, assert a different interpretation, but merely point out that the Bible is not clear on this matter. Your edits are based entirely on what YOU SAY the Bible means, not what the Bible actually says. You're in violation of NPOV no matter what, but unless you can present a reputable source giving your interpretation, you're also in violation of NOR." +" WTF?! want != need Obviously, the idiot that wrote ""the need for instant gratification"" failed economics 101. A need is something you must have for survival; that isn't instant gratification. A want is something that you would like to have but can live without. The guy that edited this is probably a consumerist moron with thousands in credit card debt. Debtors are fools that shouldn't be allowed to own anything. This is why a fully market economy can't end poverty. Only those with a proper education should be allowed to participate in a market economy. Fools that don't know the difference between a want and a need should be owned by their employer. Their employer can better determine what they need than themselves. Poverty would be eliminated by this mix of a command and market economies. The remaining unemployed, fat, and lazy fools can go to jail. I am now going to correct the article because I'm a genius and the previous editor is not. 76.178.252.151 " +REDIRECT Talk:On The Verge +Juan Angel Esparza Okay thank you-I had it as a prod but then after seeing all of the other articles the person made and reading the stuff on it I thought it was a downright hoax article! +You do realize That Japan and China have their own secret societies, and you have never heard of them, which means they are better than yours, right? +ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK ROBERT ULLMANN SUCKS DICK +dear Ironholds, I have just sent am email to you. I prefer to keep in touch by email now. thank you for your help and happy new year!!! +but real sorry becaue we are at a skool so unblock use your we will get your skool on u bro +" ''Addendum:6) I believe the original complaint that I am guilty of ""Replacing the goading comment after three independent editors expressed disapproval"" is incorrect, I only replaced the comment after one editor, RP, expressed disapproval. The comment was later replaced by another editor, who RP apparently mistook for me. Here is my last restore: .Again, I would like to request a review by an independent Admin, certainly not by the blocking Admin or any other involved in the Ref Desk guidelines dispute. " +page have a very nice day +" has offended me repeatedly''' I attempted to reach a consensus with , but he ridiculed me: ""and much less ""CNN talks about it"". Oooooh, I'm impressed! ) What kind of an argument is that, ""CNN talks about it""? hahahahahah"" Someone who makes this kind of comment doesn't want consensus, he wants to shove his view down everyone's thoats. has also offended and ridiculed me other times: ""Are you mentally challenged?"" ""Now go watch the fireworks in Copacabana and stop crying, Mr Carioca. )"" ""Man, you really are a nut job! "" ""Get a life, carioca"" ""EconomistBR is the one who is being intolerant"" All I want is to talk with him about this and him to appologize for those uncalled for offenses" +The Game Discography. Please do NOT change the sales number for the Games albums. I have access to Nielson SoundScan which is the same data base Billboard uses to gather sales figures and record labels also have access to this. As a result my sales figure are 100% accurate. Thanks. +" Back on the Colbert Report FYI: On today (Aug 2nd) show, Colbert had a ""caller"" ""phone in"" to complain about Colbert's instructions to tamper with the Elephant article. I know the article is still protected, but beware of more edits to this article" +Thank you for experimenting with the page George Felix Allen on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +" FLEIJA I've removed ""Freyja, a powerful weapon from the Code Geass anime series"" because as is shown in the show, the name of the weapon is FLEIJA - ""Field Limitary Effective Implosion Armament"". Note that while the J does not stand for anything, it is present in the weapon's name. " +"==Regarding edits made during August 31 2006== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ngo " +" ""Cease your """"mothers day"" trolling on Bloomex''"" - what is your problem? Should I show you the proof that I ordered Mother's Day flowers at bloomex yesterday?" +Could I get other eyes on this article? Please see this: . Any comments would be appreciated. +" your assessment of RSN (""it seems that the general consensus is that the Sacco book is not a reliable source"") is just what's missing from the discussion page. I'm sure you will get a response from the people on the minority of the RSN, but your uninvolved perspective would, hopefully, help promote collaboration and some compromise. " +some. Hopefully this silliness can stop now. Although Wikipedia is a great place, it's hardly reliable, but I digress. Opinions differ, and I accept that. Cheers nonetheless. +Fred C. You seem to be under the impression that I give a shit what you think. That you are an American makes you irrelevant to this discussion. This is an article about an Australian school; I doubt that you have ever been out of the US. I was happy to make what I - and others - thought was a valuable and factual contribution to the public record, however it seems you and Daniel have chosen to hijack history and hijack Wikipedia for your own personal plaything. That is very sad and you are very sad. as it is, I will from time to time (as others will from time to time) continue to restore the public record. I hope you have lots of fun trying to guess when and where that will happen. +Mr. kMan hi. I dont like the tonne of your face. Do you touch your mom with those fingers? +" I doubt it that the Wikipedia introductory sentence warning about damaging a living person refers solely to: go ahead, say what you want as long as you cannot be caught from the legal view point you can write everything you wish. I think Wikipedia refers to some honor and honesty in talking about a living person who can be damaged in his/her reputation and can suffer financial damage as well in his business . So, it is a question of honor and good editorial behavior in keeping with the truth. You are pointing out the fact that the Wikipedia article on Ruggero Santilli talks about fringe. The difference between what that article says and what the Oxyhydrogen article says is the difference between being fair and being recklessly mean and damaging. This is my example: Steve is a photographer and some of his work is considered unprofessional , childish and ""fringe"" (physicist Ruggero Santilli who is proponent of ideas some of which have been considered fringe theories) as it is in the article about Ruggero Santilli Steve is an unprofessional photographer and he is an unprofessional ""fringe"" photographer ( fringe physicist Ruggero Santilli) as in the Oxyhydrogen article You are saying that Santilli is clueless about electrolysis and therefore all his work is 'fringe"" ...... how about his books in other subjects published by Plenum, Springer Verlag, Nuovo Cimento?Did you read the? You say that you want sources, peer -reviewed article and yet you do not like the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy and cite Calo as having negative comments...how about the positive comments on Santilli's work by Cloonan and Trell in the same Journal? They are University professors .... you also do not like their universities? Do they have a poor reputation in your view? How about Santilli's article in the American Institute of Physics ? AIP also has a poor reputation? I added verbatim to the Oxyhydrogen article only what Wikipedia has in the other article about Santilli. You are confusing people who sell stuff on TV and defraud customers, from the work of reputable scientist who publish and work and are seeking the truth as much as you do and because of this you call ""fraud, bogus, fringe, nut job. Bunching these two categories (the TV fraud and the researchers) together is not ""seeking the truth"" but being reckless and damaging, especially when it was pointed out to you without calling you bogus, nut, fringe ( which could be justified by par condicio) but I am not doing it for respect toward the readers and especially myself. Please do not go back to ethics. Scuranova" +Okay, OI am really mad now, Since who ever blocked me was horrible mistake number 5, Oi will say OI again. No one can stop me from changing it. +" Oh, and just to let you know, you are in violation of 3RR. - T:C " +Walter O'Brien As someone who has been active on the talk page, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter O'Brien. +Shouldn't it just have been undone? +" radiological poisoning? I don't see anything in the articles cited actually referring to the radiological poisoning incidents as ""terrorism"" or ""nuclear terrorism"" should that section be removed? " +Volt Charging I understand why you deleted the unreferenced claim, but EVs generally do generally charge faster at higher utility voltages. The higher the voltage you pull out of the wall, the lower the current required to achieve the same power transfer rate. Three-phase 480VAC input is just wonderful... Apologies if you already know all this. +Double diggity flappity flap jacks!! Ryulong told you to GET OFF Wikipedia and you're not voting? Daaang! COME ON DOWN!!! +Iraqi 2009 elections Hi there, what is exactly you're looking for? I have all the pdf documents and the final results of that elections. +" '''LAST WARNING""Due warning: every time our anonymous friend makes a personal attack, I'm removing it. See Wikipedia:no personal attacks, also see Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks. I've had quite enough of their abuse. To the anonymous user, please start showing a more mature response when replying to comments or arguing your case. - 06:48, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) (modified 08:11, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC))"" < WIKIPEDIA POLICIES DO NOT ONLY APPLY TO ANONYMOUS USERS, THEY APPLY TO _ALL_ USERS, INCLUDING ONEGUY. ANYONE WHO ENGAGES IN PERSONAL ATTACKS IS LIABLE TO HAVE HIS OR HER COMMENTS DELETED, AND THAT INCLUDES ONEGUY. Pename" +Template:INintlegend Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:INintlegend, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the tag from the template. Thanks. +"No thanks, I'll take it to RfC. " +yo yo dude, CREATE AN ACCOUNT!!! much appreciated. if u already did, dont forget to sign in. +Robbie Ennis Please stop deleting my Robbie Ennis article as he clearly merits writing about. You don't own wikipedia, you are not an authority on everything. Your constant playing god with these pages only highlights your ignorance of the subject matter, your overwhelming arrogance and so your unsuitability as an administrator. I thank you in advance for your speedy co-operation. +" Deleted revision on my talk page Hi, I've seen you removed vandalism from my talk page () and deleted the revision (for WP:DENY, I suppose). However I'm curious to know what was it about. Can I have it sent to me? Nothing important if you can't, I was just curious. Thanks! talk " +I'm equally sick of it. Stop trying to tell us why you were right a week ago. What reason is there to keep it out now? Today. If there is no valid reason, state it and we can get this handled. +" Not being used to Wiki process I didn't see the warning until after it was made although I'm not sure what that difference would have made long term. The notion of fascism in respect of the operation of wiki is not meant as an insult but describes a particular way of operating a nation, organisation etc. Having spent many years dealing with institutional abuse of authority etc. the ""harassment"" of my contribution was corporate, but for those very reasons it will not be a productive line of enquiry. I suppose I could also turn to a zealous enforcement of the rules and seek wiki awards. Anyway in respect of my request we're now leaving wiki territory in terms of copyright and going where statutory law applies. Can you point me in the direction of an administrator or agent of wiki that can deal with this issue knowledgeabley? I haven't assigned copyright to wiki and wiki policy can't supersede law. I suppose I could formally assign copyright of all those images to a third party which would immediately create a wiki violation. I'd also be interested in views about the difference between self-interest in requiring attribution and that notion in respect of links. It's a mark (and again this is a valid view) of paternalistic and authoritarian operations no matter how benign to operate arbitrarily without explanation. I'm asking this because there is a prima facia contradiction in application of the stated rules, although I'm not expecting this to receive an effective explanation this time any more than last. " +Lemme ask this, if I'm talking about a ratio between 1 and zero, then is what I'm talking about dividing by zero, which is perhaps the central paradox of my conundrum? (Not to mention, why it doesn't fly here) +"Perhaps there could be clearer distinction between sheep breeds and ""fine animal hairs"" given the growing issues with fraud and need for consumer protection. US Customs and Border Protection Laboratory (CBPL) Methods chapter 51 indicates the distinction between fibers: 51-07 ""Wool or Mohair""; 51-18 ""Analysis of Wool, Fine or Coarse Animal Hair; Horsehair Yarn, and Woven Fabric"". Substantial confusion on the issue may be minimized by providing a summary of the following with associated fact tags... ""Specialty wool fibers"" under the ""Wool Names"" section in the Wool Act states,""Although the specialty fibers listed above may be called simply wool, they also may be identified by their specialty fiber names: mohair, Cashmere, camel, alpaca, llama, vicuna. If the name of a specialty fiber is used, the percentage of that fiber must appear on the label."" The Federal Trade Commission indicates,""There is a three percent tolerance for fiber content claims on labels... No tolerance is allowed if the label states that a product contains one fiber (exclusive of allowed amounts of ornamentation or decorative trim)... The Wool Act and Rules do not provide any tolerance for the content of wool products."" ( ) " +Vedic proofs From the current version of the article: More recently, Shri Bharati Krishna Tirthaji in his book[5] claimed ancient Indian Hindu Vedic proofs for the Pythagoras Theorem. I know nothing about Vedic Mathematics, so I thought I'd ask the question here... Is this assertion notable enough to warrant a mention ? If yes, we should probably expand a bit (what are these proofs ? if there are not known, why is it believed that they exists ? etc). On the other hand, if it is just a lonely claim, we can probably remove this. +Well, I'll see whether anyone disagrees. (talk) +SUCK MY PLUMS YOU STUPID SEPTIC CUNT +Rooster Teeth Productions Hey, I was just wondering what you undid that the one user put down? -Zachafinackus +I also note that according to the dispute resolution procedure, that I don't proceed to dispute resolution or arbirtration until after the block is lifted - which is now. +" Capitain ""certain"" of his child being a boy This really bugs me. When the doctor was questioning Capitain of how he knew it was going to be a boy, it definitely questioned a potential parallel to Ofelia's journey. Was it just a mere matter of arrogance on Capitain's part, or a ""certain"" reason that the child was going to be a boy? " +" Hi, OzWhiz, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. TAB Additional tips TABTAB Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia! If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.TAB You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. You may want to add yourself to the new user log.TAB If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — talk contribs PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian. Click here to respond to this message!" +User Redtigerxyz has hurt religious sentiments in his remarks against Lord Vishnu +Keith Olbermann the material i put on there was cited by credibal sources. I know its hard to imagan that your hero Olbarmann would do that but its true. +How about the Collins' side of the story in the Freitas, Merkle fracas? It's why it all got in here, isn't it? This article would not exist if it were not for that fracas. +" Notice of change Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. '''''' talk (delivered by mabdul )" +I think my userbox is nothing compared to the content of these users' pages. The counterpart to supporting resistance is supporting the agressor. You should have sorted these pages out long ago, with or without my userbox. A proper offer would be that you sort every userbox supporting anything and I stop worrying about mine. But still, I saw how you people deal with things. A consensus has been reached twice, the second time with adminis-traitor Viridae. As soon as the userbox was back on my page, another idiot removed it. Viridae refused to restore it and remind the idiot that it was approved. I guess that will be the case if we did reach another consensus. +Wost Ever Would it hurt to note that some historians consider him the worst president ever? +" Removing ""Notable Asexuals"" section There is regular contention about whether something should stay or go from this section, and entries arrive and disappear. I think we might actually be better off getting rid of the section altogether, to save a whole load of arguments. If one of the people in this list really is notable about being asexual, we should be able to get a direct quote from them and put it in the relevant section of the article. What does everyone else think? (talk) (cont) " +for the company & for the trade only. It's fairly hard to find. Sorry for deleting the part about the silscreened labels that were re-introduced. That was pretty dumb. Glad some astute & watchful sysop reverted the copy change (shameless flattery alert). Attempting to add the dates of expansion of brands acquired since this book is a reliable source. 13:07, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) +Flats, not house This source is pretty clear that Menezes lived in a block of flats, not a house. +Message for Bar Are you sure that I am blocked? 122.106.83.63 (767-249ER- Admin) +(UTC) I fixed that not long after posting this. 19:24, 6 January 2007 +Vandalism Pamela Anderson article GraemeL, I want to entertain you, baby ! Pamela +For me it is still a enigma how two people like Albanians and Greeks who have lived with and helped each other for many thousands years can despise each other. +Many of the eastern european members use very little French, and several of the ex-colonies French use has greatly declined. +I am NOT a n00b Despite appearances, I am NOT a n00b in any sense. One boilerplate welcome message is too many, thanks. I just don't have any time to devote to this... / +veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks veggietales sucks +vandalism are you mad, bhagat singh was born in arya samajist family i am not claiming this, it is well known fact.122.161.78.118 +Please Please stop being a jerk or you will be blocked. +Maybe you disagree if it was with in policy but there was still no consensus. I disagreed with nomination and supplied many sources and the nomination only wanted to delete it because it had vandalism. Does not sound like consensus to me. Can you reconsider? Thank you, +"== GUSAC-GITAM University Science and Activity Center == About GUSAC by G U S A C - Gitam University Science and Activity Centre on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 2:54pm · GITAM University Science and Activity Center The GUSAC team is privileged to invite the students across the GITAM University. After several untiring efforts we have been finally successful in launching a Science and Activity Center at GITAM University. MOTTO: “ It’s not what you know, It’s what you do with what you know” . Our main objective is to integrate knowledge and transfer the same to students.GUSAC will provide an exclusive platform to the ""Budding Future"" by nourishing their creativity. It will unleash the genius with in them and capacitate them to implement their ideas to the in numerous problems arising in the world. A fresher aims to attain his/her goals during his/her tenure in the university. GUSAC provides a scope for students like these by imparting knowledge through classes,friendly seminars, practical assignments....., it also enables them to build a team for participating in fests and assists them with the required infrastructure to make their projects, besides creating a platform for the student research. Benefits of GUSAC: It creates an environment for interested students to evenly space out and implement their ideas. Many students who have potential and are interested in participating in various events fail to do the same may be due to lack of proper inter-departmental knowledge and freedom to put forth their ideas. This center fill these gaps and provide better prospects for the students of GU. Students will be exposed to national level competitions and are provided with a platform to put forth their projects and to gain recognition for their work. Most of the projects aimed at will be targeted towards nation-building, to help the needy and the disabled. Seeing the benefits of GUSAC, here is a tentative curriculum on how GUSAC moves forward: GUSAC will be administered in the following manner: Step 1: All the students are free to enroll into GUSAC by giving names into database and will be accessible to weekend classes, friendly seminars and practical assignments. Step 2: The students who are regular to the weekly classes with their active involvement towards GUSAC will be shifted to this step based on a small essay or a video on ""why should they be selected into step-2"". In step 2 the student is free to access the GUSAC labs and to use the equipments as well. Step 3: Eligible students of second year (sophomores) will be placed in a semi-core group and will contribute to the decision making process of GUSAC. Step 4: Eligible students of third year (juniors) will be placed in sub-core and will have higher powers than semi-core. Step 5: Eligible students of final year (seniors) will be in the core group. They will co-ordinate all the events of GUSAC and will play a crucial role in the decision making process of GUSAC. The students will be given weekly assignments which will make them think out of the box and students who win will be awarded in an interesting way. The freshers can gain extra knowledge and make use of this to innovate projects using their time productively. Stepping Stones to Success: A student gathering will take place every week to discuss their interests and recent trends in Management, Science and Technology. Students will work on their projects and ideas with freedom and utilities. Experienced students will give lectures and problem statements will be given to students as practical assignments to keep enhancing their engineering skills. Events like expos, seminars, fests and workshops will be conducted on a regular basis and representatives from the industry as well as academic circles like IIT’s will be invited to these events. Faculty members who are interested in sharing their knowledge will always be welcome to do so in any of the aforementioned events and gatherings. Students will be informed about the fests, events, industrial visits, internships to retain the practical approach of curriculum. The center will be visiting schools nearby to have chalk talks with the kids and also will give them a privilege to showcase their ideas. The interested one's will be called upon to the university to have a look at our projects and ideas. If the chords of ingenuity have struck right, why not unearth the Einstein with in you??? @ GITAM STUDENTS why late, get yourself enrolled in GUSAC and scale heights in the world of emerging trends." +I should point out that I try to use rollback cautiously, and I might have got a little carried away with this one. What's up, Doc? carrots +Yeah, and the title gives a hint on what's following to help the reader decide what he/she wants to know. So those link titles need to be descriptive, somewhat. And they are right now, so don't change it. +" OSE Regarding this edit/revert, don't you think that's the whole point of the link, so that we don't have four paragraphs of repeated material? I think it's important, absolutely, but this page is already long and encompassing, I would think it would make sense to slim down a little where we can, and the OSE concept does have its own page that not only begins with that text verbatim, but goes into it much deeper. I'm not going to get into a revert war over it; that'd be silly, and I don't even want to think about 1RR or 2RR. I'd rather get your perspective and rationale surrounding it and perhaps (probably) we can see the other's impetus and figure out the best, most logical, and most effective final solution. Moving it wholesale probably isn't it, but having a full screen-page of duplicate info isn't either, I don't (right now) think. I'd like to hear your insights on the matter. Thanks in advance! • • • 02:14 (UTC) 27 Mar '08" +eat Dl2000CK ..|.. +(a highly respected and well known Lincoln Authority!) +Also, good faith edits are not considered vandalism. —talk +Matthew Gagnon is a hoax It's a vanity page created by a teenager. Stop readding the information. 24.182.64.206 +Actually, now that I think about it, even the final s in choisis would be pronounced in choisis-en, but I can't think of an example for je choisis, which is the example given. +User Minglink , is a religious fanatic ... probably a sock puppet account from a previous user from Pakistan ( who got banned multiple times for the same reason ) , that is vandalizing articles about religion , and has a certain fantasy with albania , which in fact does not correspond with reality ... ! Get a life , albania is a multireligious mostly agnostic country .... ! Let me stress out that , the same administrator will be notified that banned you last time ! ( ) +Phil Sandifer heads up Are you aware that +" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." +They're a lot more New Englander than Texan, sad, embarrassing for us, but true. Poppy is clearly a patrician New Englander who just went south for money, and Dubya loses his Texas drawl anytime he's not in front of the Faux News cameras. 14:29, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) +"*Support. Gulf War is a true illness and this name is used by myself and Garth Nicolson (mycoplasma fermentans incognitus ""discoverer"") " +Dithering The article mentions that: Pointillism is analogous to the four-color CMYK printing process used by some color printers and large presses that place dots of Cyan (blue), Magenta (red), Yellow, and Key (black). Televisions and computer monitors use a similar technique to represent image colors using Red, Green, and Blue (RGB) colors. The technique used by CMYK printing is dithering, among others. The CMYK article even says so. Should there not be mention on this page of dithering, especially seeing as how it's popularly used for sprite and pixel art with a constricted palette? +Global Warming or Just a Phase ACTUALLY it is said that as the atmosphere is decreasing near the poles, it is INCREASING in other areas. They just don't tell the public that because they want people to think that this is a horrible thing. People are putting so much work and money into PREVENTING this natural phase that I believe the earth is going through. True, the world might eventually burn up some day but our descendants will all be raptured by then. +"he was telling the truth. Wikipedians are fags like you that have no life but spend all day editing shitty pages and giving rules. Just fuck off... -⊕ talk" +I am find with it being removed. -) +It is about the remarkable popularity of the product in one country, with sales far out of proportion to the population and a deep cultural affinity to the product. Are there quotes from a US president out there talking about Kraft Mac & Cheese? Thought not. Everywhere else, it's just a box with some dry stuff in it. In Canada, it's part of the culture. How can that not be about the product? +Could idiotic self-righteous people please refrain from editing or deleting my talk page in future. You may not like what has been written on it, but it is not a Wikipedia article, it is a talk page, so you would do well to leave it alone. Thankyou. +"Delay is quoted as stating that ""Our school systems teach the children that they are nothing but glorified apes who are evolutionized [sic] out of some primordial soup."" in " +" ACBest|AC]]BestMy Contributions 21:01" +" If I was a new reader, and I read your version, I'd just end up being more confused. And if we were doing ""reveal the details as they occur chronologically,"" then the Torch returning and throwing the Vision's origin in question would be written after the bit about the government dismantling him, and not before. Was the idea of the Vision's body originally being the Torch's a retcon? The only thing I would really consider to be a retcon was Byrne trying to undo everything in the 1990s with West Coast. Should we write something like ""Byrne tried retconning the Vision being the original Human Torch by bring the Human Torch back"" (and Byrne has stated on his forum how he never liked the idea of the two being the same; should that be stated as well?), and then how Busiek tried to 'unretcon' it in Avengers Forever? " +It should be called Rapcore Rap rock is when it gets mixed with rock and rap metal is when hip hop is mixed with metal but rapcore is another word for rap rock and rap metal +You have to sign up to post on the ABC tribute page. Suggest using the easier option of the SMH's or The Australian's +umm the problem is you've put NO tags... fan 13:28, August 6, 2005 (UTC) +" Why delete? Ms. Byron is a clear example of a young person who has made a successful career for herself. An artist who has carved out a niche. Not many artists can even afford to feed themselves. Also as a role model to young people who are looking for exciting and different career choices (didn't we all browse through the encyclopedias when we were young?). Furthermore, the business of ""special effects"" in movies and television is intruguing and I am very impresses to see a sculptor choose and succeed in such a career aspiration. Expand the page, include interviews with this vital young woman. Spare the letcherous accusations." +NOTE: I corrected the misinformation on the NYPD page. NYPD never had 25 helicopters. & is the largest number since they first started using them in the 1950's. The current sworn officer stats change daily and come from the Office of Deputy Commissioner for Public Information, NYPD (Pau Browne). Don't confuse number of sworn officers with authorized strength. NYPD is well below authorized numbers. Also changed were the number of police stations - 76 Precincts in NYC not 98. These are the numbered precints (precincts of record) and do not include special units like Highway Patrol, Mounted, ESU, Aviation, etc. Police boat numbers also change from season to season - more in summer. Current listing is an average for the whole year. +" Original Game drew inspiration from Star Wars? Er, is there anything to back that up? The original version of battletech ""drew inspiration"" principally from the cartoon RoboTech, or at least its mecha and miniatures (some details here: http://brianscache.com/unseen/). " +" ""The Upper and Lower Writhlington, Huish & Foxcote were all merged into one colliery."" Obviously the ""&"" is a MoS no-no, so was the name of the colliery ""Huish & Foxcote""? Hopefully resolved. ""The spoil heap is a now Writhlington Site of Special Scientific Interest, and includes 3,000 tons of Upper Carboniferous spoil from which more than 1,400 insect fossil specimens have been recovered, including Phalangiotarbi,[10] and Graeophonus.[11] and the world's earliest known Damselfly,[12] It is a Geological Conservation - Protected Site."" There are a few things wrong with this sentence, apart from its attempt on the world length record. Why ""fossil specimens"" rather that just ""fossils""? Is the bit following ""Damselfly"" meant to be a new sentence? Is "" Geological Conservation - Protected Site"" an official designation? Whether it is or not, there's a problem with that hyphen. Should it be some kind of dash? Hopefully resolved. References Citation #23 appears to be dead. Hopefully resolved.— talk " +" Image:Club_Comunicaciones.gif I have tagged Image:Club_Comunicaciones.gif as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Tex " +" Hi again, I think (and I think you think so too) that if we want to move forward and be efficient, the first think will be to set up a ""protocol"" of discussion (whatever the binding RfC, binding mediation or discussion). Regarding this latest, this is a total no-sense with nobody listening to anybody else. " +Removed Pending Changes Reviewer userbox I have removed the Pending Changes Reviewer userbox you had on your userpage because you do not have that user right. Reviewing changes is not the same thing as having this particular user right and claiming you have the right when you don't is misleading and shouldn't be done. You are welcome to apply for this user right here and once you get it, feel free to re-add the userbox. Thanks! +" You have no idea what you're talking about Unlike the silly kids who come to this site and put this false information everywhere, I actually KNOW as a FACT that Deep Purple, Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin are HARD ROCK and NOT, by ANY MEANS AT ALL Heavy Metal. Sabbath and Deep Purple themselves have stated clearly many times that they are NOT HEAVY METAL. You are putting false information on this site, which is why this place is so unreliable. I am cleaning it up and making it more accurate. I would guess you are clearly much younger than me, I was brought up with these bands and I know better. The same with the stupid idea that ""heavy metal"" started in the late 60's. It DID NOT. It started in the mid 70's, I know, because I saw it form. Being the ""forefather"" of heavy metal does NOT MAKE YOU HEAVY METAL YOURSELF. It is you who is vandalising this website by putting false information on these bands pages after they have made clear several million times that they are NOT what everyone keeps saying they are. It is also easy to hear the difference. If I had the power, it would be people like YOU who would be blocked because you are making this site an unreliable source of information. IF you think you're right, ask the bands themselves. Then maybe you will change how you think. But I doubt it. Take care. " +Why is it that the Israeli Apartheid article is prefix-ed with the word ALLEGATIONS while this notion of a NEW-Antisemitism is not? The notion of apartheid has been brought up by a wide-range of credible academics/politicians/etc. people from all walks of life. Israelis as well as Non-Israelis. Whereas with this notion of a NEW antisemitism, the only people who take this seriously are ardent Zionists. It's a complete joke. The fact, that 'allegations' appears before APARTHEID and doesn't for this fraud of an article just shows you how worthless Wikipedia is when it comes to any article that is critical of Israel. +Blocked indef, as it appears your account is compromised. If you can prove control of the account, please do so. Talk +Darian Weiss I wrote the article. What do you mean that it is fan pov??? show me where? I've simply pointed out the stuff the kid has done. You want me to minimize them? He does ice skate professionally. He has skated with Olympic champions. What's so wrong about including that?? +he was a traitor and did what traitors do +I hope this is helpful. +Looks like they have a real annoying javascript script to try and force you to use their frames. One less site I'll ever visit. +" FYI FYI. • Lawrence Cohen " +\ Thank you. Now please desist from threatening me, and lay off until I have a good answer to your attitude problems. +Welcome! Hello, Revjun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! +I did have a problem with the same guy being plaintif, judge and jury, twice, the first time not even bothering to follow protocol - i did not take him seriously, just laughed at his second block and belived that he would get away with it a second time, being all three, only since im so impopular - however, at the same time, i considered that if there was any real justification for his actions, a third party would do the same. And that is what you did. Not only are you a third party that seemingly agrees with his desicion, you also have passionatly defended my works against people like him on several occasions. Therefore, i respect you and take your advice with the highest respect. I would request you to help me in this mater, and if you percive me violating WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA again, then please (1) notify me, (2) give me a explanation of how i did it and (3) how i should have done it, and i will (1) retract my statment, whadever it may be, (2) rephrace it and (3) ask for an apology to the victim of my error. As for MONGO, he is on the far opposite side of where you stand in my view. I whold have a promblem seeing him having right, even if he was right for once. +Update: After moving to the end of my monobook.js, this and all my other scripts work fine. Maybe that script does something strange in the end. Yay! (☎•✎) +Can you verify that this assertion is fact by providing a reliable source? It seems to me this is original research which is not allowed. +Dec. 09, 2013 Response to user:ChrisGaultieri I made the following edits to the Vecima Networks wiki page: Sumit Kumar is now CEO and President Vecima Saskatoon facilities are now ISO 9001-2008 registered Number of employees is now 555 as of Sept. 30, 2013 Market Cap is $140 million CAD as of Sept. 30, 2013 Vecima Toronto and Parramatta offices are now closed Vecima is no longer a principal member of the WiMAX forum Vecima is no longer in decline; its sales have stabilized and gross margins have improved. The company history needed some refinement Removed references to old press releases If you feel that some of these edits should not havebeen made, then please do not simply roll-back the changes and instead let me know your reasons for objecting to my edits. Thanks you, MKT771 +Where did the Jews for Holocaust come from? The statistic shows that Germany and Austria together had together about 2,000,000 Jewish population. It is stated that the Jewish population did drop by about 6,000,000 during the holocaust. Where did the Germans take those Jews from? Something does not add up here. +is a gay scientology ass kissing baby fucker| i do it for the lulz desudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesudesu +" Oppose - Mais Oui! was correct to move this. It is no longer called Ross-shire, a linguistic absurdity comparable to Cornwallshire or Northumberlandshire; Ross is the historical name of this ancient comital province, Ross was the product of a past tendency/desire to anglicize Scottish placenames, and has even produced a culture concept known to academics as ""Scotlandshire""; the area is now officially called ""Ross and Cromarty"" (strangely, as Cromarty is in Easter Ross). Ross-shire certainly is not the most common name, as was claimed above, but I'll admit usage does survive among people who've had grown accustomed to using it. Ross-shire should be a redirect to either Ross(! what is wrong with Ross (disambiguation)), Ross (area) or Ross and Cromarty. - " +Just discovered that the film is in fact uploaded in its entirety on YouTube. [] (The lack on hits compared to the infamous time traveler video is just depressing) I'll watch it tonight. +Image layout After looking at the German version of this article i really like the layout of the images more, Should it be changed?, Here is the page for reference. +You cleaned up some redundancies, so thx. +Yeah, Fridae'sDoom didn't appeal to me anymore. +PS Flatearthers and tinfoil hatters are in a closely related group to the spontaneous burning fat lady crowd - don't agree too much with them, except out of kindness, for fear that you might be grouped with the tinfoil hatters yourself. +Blocking this IP hi, Just to let you know, this IP is from a public terminal at Walter Library on the University of Minnesota campus, so I imagine blocking it won't do much good in stopping the abuser you are after. +This article should not be split I disagree. The f4j began in the UK and spread to the USA. It ended due to the efforts of the founder Matt O'Connor. It continues to exist today due to the efforts of Jamil Jabr and several other dedicated family rights activists. It should not be split, but the path of F4j needs to be clarified. Once past the introductory paragraph, this article is a train wreck. +Wikipedia is not a place for companies or organizations to tell the world about themselves. +The 3RR rule applies to a person, not an IP address. You will be blocked under this address too, if you revert again. - +That's what needs to be done. The only way to proove they are mixed is by the dates of the reviews. - Theironminer (talk, 1:30 AM, 5 July, 2014 +What is biased about the article? It accurately describes the Tajiks and there history. I think your objection is from the statement that Tajiks are Persian. Tell me, what is the difference between the Tajik of Central Asia and the Persian of Iran? Both people speak the same language, have the same literary tradition, same cultural habits, and same history. The only difference is political. The difference is similar to that of the Germans. In that, the northern Germans are predominantely Protestant, while the southern Germans are predominantly Catholic. The Persians of Iran are predominantly Shi'e, while the Persians of Central Asia are predominantly Sunni. +Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!) Here are a few links you might find helpful: Be Bold! Don't let grumpy users scare you off. Meet other new users Learn from others Play nice with others Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! Tell us about you You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. We're so glad you're here! · Talk''' +" Speedy deletion of ""Shrini"" A page you created, Shrini, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. ~   " +Response So put it in other MPs article. A full year ago? That's not a long-time. This is supposed to be a biography, not her latest news. It has a lot of bearing on her work, as it indicates what position she takes on issues like accountability and frugality with tax-payers' money. +Aren't you afraid your party will end in bloodshed? +"""Start Me Up"" ""Rough Justice"" ""Satisfaction"" 2007- Prince (XLI) Prince performed a twelve-minute medley of songs that were intersperced with stunning guitar solos in the style of Jimi Hendrix and Eddie Van Halen. The show was performed in heavy rain that drenched the stage, shaped in the artist's logo. " +Just checked the liner notes in my copy of Machina, and Auf der Maur is not listed as a contributer of the album. All press releases prior to the release of Zeitgeist call Schroeder and Pooley new members. Auf der Maur was no more of a contributor to the band than these two, despite sources calling them official new members. If Schroeder and Pooley are considered live and touring members, then so should Auf der Maur. +The Criticism section The way the criticism section reads at the time of this writing is quite okay, in my opinion. It brings up the most important, on point criticisms of the mainstream in a very readable, well sourced manner, without superfluous ad hominem comments. It also include a reasonable level of Austrian responses to the criticisms. In my view, there is no need for any further changes. The Mises-slur is, again, completely redundant and serves no purpose whatsoever. I therefore suggest that the section is left as it is. +That depressing feel when you realize this guy is still alive +:Ed Windle Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Ed Windle) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +Perez Hilton is simply a gossip blogger, and while possibly entertaining, his saying something does not make it true. I have removed the homosexual rumors, as for now, they are simply rumors, and placing rumors in the biography of a living person is a potentially libelous problem. Until Dallas speaks on the subject in a format that can be referenced properly, the information should not be included. +The whole section is very unclear and conflicting. +" The info struck me as a bit POV as well. ""...a next-generation courier company,"" in particular. " +":Calamitybrook, you might read some of the many, many responses made over time about these issues. You might consider wp:dispute resolution, wp:COIN, or wp:RfC to gather support for your position. However, your abusive behaviour is not likely to draw much in the way of help: see again, guidance on your talk page, this talk page, wp:COIN, wp:WQA. Please follow it.- Sinneed " +" I can read just fine. Can you? Let me cite two instances for you: ""WestLaw and LexisNexus search results are considered viable sources in themselves. If the search results show that there has never been a trial, then there you go, you've now got a source."" You can't just say ""no one"" says there was a trial unless you attribute that to a source, otherwise your comments are not verifiable. Please read WP:V for further information. According to the WP:3O page: ""This page is meant only for disagreements involving precisely two people"" This disagreement involves three people. You, PBS, and myself. Actually, 4, that guy I cited earlier. So, stop accusing me of not knowing how to read. I've made it as plain as day for you to see. If you continue to disrupt wikipedia to make a WP:POINT, we're going to have problems. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! " +hate hate hate hate what's up with you hating on HNM eh? ima fuckin' balla, that shit's for REAL son! recognise that you a h8ter, shea! You think this is a game? fuck no son, this shit is real life playa! So you think you're all badass cuz ur from New York? eh? Fuck that i'm from Compton son! that shit's for real! HNM 2006 International Balla! +"spelling out numbers == I agree entirely: to me, ""five cats and 32 dogs"" is just dandy. That advice has been in MOSNUM since pussy was a kitten. Just as well it's cast in watery terms, with the fingerprints of Anderson's recent tampering; it's one of the few I don't mind. I'll check out the nomination now. Ta. (talk) == " +" Speedy deletion of Myst fight klub A tag has been placed on Myst fight klub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T C " +BLOCKING BLOCKING ME OVER THE BLANKING OF MY USERPAGE IS AN ABUSE OF SYSOP PRIVILAGES. THANKS FOR PUTTING ME OFF WIKIPEDIA FOR EVER. TWAT FACE +Agreed, and good call on the citation needed tag. I've been a long time L.E. viewer with my children and had no idea where that information came from. +Independent is written next to political position, I think it's rather clear what independent is referring to. What I'm saying is what's taught to students in high school. I hope atleast some of you finished high school. +There is some confusion. I dont believe in editing comments. I think some past relevent comments have been edited too. +" Marching Band Drum Trophy? The Big 12 Conference article says the trophy in the border showdown is the ""Marching Band Drum."" I have not heard of it off hand. If it is indeed the trophy it should be mentioned in the article along with a citation (I can't find it on google). " +" It's OK. Moves are performed by clicking on ""move"" button to the right of the button you click when you want to edit the page. Since the page Estonian War of Independence has some history of editing, the only way to effect it is to announce your plans on WP:RM and start voting on the talk page of the article you want to move. If you have problems with this, you may want to ask people on WP:RM to arrange the process for you. -трёп- " +" Thank you for that Steve - sorry it blew up in your face. Here's a puzzle I'll leave you all with. I never noticed the detail of that *other* AN/I thread. During the period leading me upto asking for an unblock, when I'm openly discussing it with people about the steps I need to take to get unblocked and I know that people are going to be checking my recent history closely - I decide to get engaged in some page vandalism with an ISP (not a specific ip just one that can be linked to a particular ISP) that can be pointed at as belonging to me. *right* at that time. Here is a prediction - if I come back in six months and start asking again, *I'll* get engaged in vandalism. It's a neat trick because it's impossible for me to counter - because of course I'm going to say it's not me aren't I. Well played. " +I know you are very knowledgeable on Iranian-related topics, no worries ) I just wondered, that's all. Anyway, I wanna return the sources I added, if the removal of the other souces was your only complaint? ]]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ethnicities_in_Iran&diff;=639404477&oldid;=639361603]] Let me know, and I wont remove the rest. - 94.210.203.230 +Nightwish, Metal Ganres, And Metal Music This is mainly in concern to your post on the Nightwish page. Please do not take this in any way, shape or form as an attack, but more as a offer of guidance. I highly suggest, that when you read an article, you read it thoroughly. If you are unsure of the meaning of something, follow the link associated with it, and read the article about it. If a link is not provided, a good dictionary site such as this one should help. In relevance to Nightwish's musical style, they are not Gothic. For reasons why, i suggest you read the articles Symphonic Metal and Gothic Metal. In relevance to metal genre pages, and metal bands in genre. There is often discussion upon things to do with these, but low and behold, please be assured there is a dedicated network of users who work on this musical form, and the bands within, who are all highly experienced in the topic, and all work with, and sometimes against each other, to make the articles the best they can be. Please feel free to join any discussion on any page, but please read through previous disscussions, to see why the comments currently made, are being made. Hope you fair well, and thank you for the time taken to comment on Nightwish's current talk page. +" Lets compose ""Incusion Criteria"" Ok, we leave it too long. I propose following criteria to incuding entries on this list. The element must has signification impact in the work. Simply ""having word Cthulhu as grafiti in one comic panel"" doesn't noaable enough. Nor does ""having Deep One as one of minor enemies in games"". ""A Necronomicon can be spot on main character's bookshelf"" doesn't count either. As enemy in games, the thing must be at least a major boss. The necronomicon must has vital role (and it must be Lovecraft necronomicon, second-hand derived from Evil Dead doesn't count). If the names are different from mythos, citation need. Nope, similar name isn't enough. You may think it's obvious, but there is chance that the name actually derived from something else or the author simply want weird name. In fact, many of deities in Aztec mythology has name as weird as Cthulhu. How about that? " +". \Thanx I am NOT intersted to sign, as I do DISAGREE with many who are granted the privilege of monitoring the Wikipedia as moderators. We first need to clean the house and get those who should NOT be moderators as they luck the qualifications. This applies to some moderators from EASTERN EUROPE with unintentional nationalistic or pro-communist orientation, some military personell as moderators is vandalizing articles with wrong methods of confrontation, and some members of US Congress who are correcting their CV (RESUMES) specially prior to e(R)ections. This applies also to people specialy those with PhDs who think they know it all and in real life they only read some required by programs books prepared by special intersts and really know nothing! To many young, inexperienced while colorful ""PHEASANTS"" are allowed to be moderators. The YOUTH and inexperienced irrational behavior is NOT a substitude for over half of the century education and experience" +Also re-included sentence and the 3 reliable sources, that another editor wrote and was developed through consensus, relating to 1985 and the first discussion of the term occupational health (psychology). Think it reads better now. More factual and specifically relevant to this article. +"""The butt is blue"" is clearly a crude translation for humorous effect. I would translate ""尻が青い"" (which I have never heard in Japan) as ""The buttocks are blue,"" and Japanese Wikipedia agrees with me. Everyone has two shiri. That usage of 青い indicates that the Japanese cannot tell blue from green is yer normal avvige ignorant Western tripe. " +reply back fucker or are ya 2 busy fuckin ya mother +Pet skunk citations Hi there, it would appear both links I was trying to use for the content in the History section of my Pet skunk article (soon to be renamed Domestic skunk) have been blocked as spam: http://members.aol .com/oddpet/chapterskunk.html http://jwarnick .com/oddpet/chapterskunk.html I googled for that content, but didn't find it anywhere else.. it's not really a big deal, but it keeps me from editing the History section, unless I eliminate the link. I think the content is useful, although I understand, if they have become notorious spamsters. 13:23, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) +Nepal How is Nepal listed as one of the combatants on the British side? Is there any proof of this? Some source that states that the State/Kingdom of Nepal was allied to British in their fight against the freedom fighters? +" FYI, ""Snugger"" is a trademark; it's Emerson's name for their hugger-style fan. Personally, I disagree that a separate section needs to be added. Hugger fans are no different from any other ceiling fan in any way, except for the fact that they don't have a downrodsomething which is entirely unrelated to the fan's operation. The motor, blades, etc. is no different. Refer to the section ""Bases for Comparison"", subsection ""Height of the fan relative to the ceiling"", for more info on huggers if you're interested. That section details their sole disadvantage; it is appropriate for it to be in that section since it is not a problem unique to huggers (though all huggers have it). The sole advantage of a hugger is that it saves spacesomething which is such blatantly obvious common sense that it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article (any more than the statement ""water is wet"" belongs in the article on water). Basically my point is that huggers are no different from ordinary fans, and so don't deserve their own section any more than each decor-themed fan at Home Depot deserves its own section." +Apology I have just been given a bollocking by my mate about how vandalism is bad and wikipedia is good etc. Still personally beleive that the Kat Flecher page should contain commentary on how smug she is but I have agreed with who's computer I had been using during my 'vandalism' not to do it again for the sake of the integeraty of his I.P address. He is standing over my shoulder now telling me to ask for you to remove the block on this I.P address. (82.10.116.128.). Sorry. Oh yea and feel free to delete this user name as I won't use it again. +Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles or before discussions about the title have ended, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +Requested move Priština International Airport → Priština International Airport — Official name from the official Homepage of Airport: http://www.airportpristina.com Survey Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Discussion Add any additional comments: +"/acc/ Account Request Tool] to easily request an account. I removed the e-mail address from this page, you need to enter it in the interface. Regards Why " +The JPost is a newspaper consisting of IDF press releases. Arutz Sheva is a Israeli settler production—no more need be said. No, Haaretz is a nice, safe, middle of the road, liberal, Israeli paper. Not too extreme way or the other. I read it daily and like it a great deal, though it is still hopelessly 'pro'-Israel sometimes.~ +Consider paying better attention in the future. I was redoing an action of UtherSRG, and no one cared when he did it. By paying attention in the future, you will save yourself from appearing foolish. +Removing the 2nd picture The 2nd picture needs to be removed. That is obviously not a picture of mexican Coca-Cola, hell, the label is covering the name! I honestly can' figure out how to remove it, but please remove it whoever reads this, a picture of a Coke rip off is not relevant to this article. +We Have Our Eyes On You]] +Sent you an e-mail via Special:EmailUser. +Fuck you You're a stupid bitch 142.162.85.154 +The reliable sources that I cited QUOTED THIS FANSITE, and pre-orders might by sparked by guess what, this very Wikipedia article and people calling the stores etc. +It's not vandalism in the slightest. Go go stupid automated bots. It's on account of the fact this IP is shared amongst several dozen people, if not a few hundred. Maybe I should just register an account if being associated with this IP means legitimate edits get reverted for no good reason. +, 11 November 2010 (UTC) I'm afraid I'm unable to accept that. If you've missed my quotes, then you based your statements and accusations on your own fantasy, did you not? 17:03 +Rapid Hire Centres Limited Rapid Hire Centres Limited is a supplier of tool and equipment hire in the UK as well as being a logistical and technical partner to businesses of all sizes. Operating under the banner of Rapid Hire Centres, the company has a network of 3 outlets, one in Huddersfield, one in the village of Honleyand one in the village of Elland. Rapid Hire Centres originated in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire in 1996. History The company was formed in 1996, by Kirk Stansfield on Leeds Road, Huddersfield. Initially known as Rapid Tool Hire, the shop focused on tool and equipment hire with a small stock of sale items. In 2002 Kirk Stansfield joined forces with his friend Andrew Jones and opened a second shop in the village of Honley near Holmfirth. Kirk Stansfield opened another shop in 2007 in the village of Elland near [[Halifax]. Andrew jones built up the sales side of the business, which now accounts for half of the company's turnover. During the 2007 Recession the building industry was in decline and it was decided soon after by the owners to set up an internet site selling tools and equipment, this would give Rapid Hire Centres a larger customer base, and would save jobs. Rapid Tools Direct UK was formed by Kirk Stansfield and Andrew Jones in 2009. The company now services customers throughout the UK. +The aspect of Palin is exciting the way a car wreck is. It's hideous, but we humans just can't look away. Bits andPieces +Early March 2012 edits The material contained in this diff is here saved. Diffs can be very useful. The material could be userfied in a sandbox for instance. I do think we are moving forward, going with the new article The works of Francis Bacon at least will be approved by other users I do hope who are looking in on this important figure in so many fields. ( talk) +Wim, fair point. AFAIK the variants in OMIM associated with mental retardation are rare. I think that there has been some investigation of more common variants in the same genes in relation to full scale IQ, with mostly negative findings. +Female foeticide in India {subst:uw-disruptive2}} +Do you have a source to back this up? +Why can't this information be merged into Paul McCartney? +, 31 August 2011 (UTC) That is informative. Thanks. 14:49 +This person is a racist vandal. Someone please reverse his vandalism. +"She still wants any references to her behind and her ""Personal Life"" section removed. She is not the least bit happy that they are still there. 3 June 2007 (UTC) " +I demand more competent admins review this. +Supergroup? Shouldn't Guns N' Roses be considered a supergroup? Not only did the original members (Axl, Tracii, Izzy, Ole and Rob) play in either Hollywood Rose or LA Guns, but all the current (bad) members have played in famous bands as well, like Nine Inch Nails, Buckethead's band etc. So shouldn't the first line say: Guns N' Roses are an American rock supergroup, formed in Los Angeles, California in 1985. NOT Guns N' Roses are an American rock band, formed in Los Angeles, California in 1985. ? 60.242.127.62 60.242.127.62 +it is clearly the red monrail. look at the pictures. that is not pink monorail. +" In his letter of resignation, Sanger didn't call himself cofounder, but ""Ex-chief organizer, Wikipedia"". Could this be a compromise position? Talk| " +" I also found use of the word ""humanists"" confusing. The types of people listed preceding ""humanists"" are defined by what they *do* (i.e. study, teach, do medical research) which makes sense in the context of talking about the commonplace book as one of their tools. ""Humanists"" defines people of a certain ethical ideologywhat does that have to do with the function of a commonplace book? Is the use of a commonplace book particularly defined by one's world perspective? To me this would be akin to writing ""many blogs are maintained by writers, professors, lawyers, editorialists, and Republicans/Democrats"" in an article about blogs. True though it may be, it confuses the reader into thinking that the subject being written about is somehow ideologically specific when it is not." +" Hey Hey Mardavich, See the United Nation's map about regions of the world, there is no region called ""Southwest Asia"" 20:45, 21 December 2006" +You are a rat bastard. And you know why. +Wachowskis? According to the interview on this page, the Wachoskis had nothing to do with this comic. Shall I remove the reference to them? +Regarding the page List of Barney & Friends videos, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ()(Talk) +Sock puppet Sorry to bother you, but an obvious sock (Special:Contributions/76.232.253.147) currently performing mass deletions on Genocides in history. +" Maybe as a bootleg it was ""Last flowers to the hospital"" as a work in progress, but the official release is just ""Last flowers"" full stop. 67.5.157.118 " +Who Did I attack on the Garfield Heights talk page? +"==MTA== Technically, the MBTA replaced the MTA; it is legally not a descendant, but a new agency to which all of the assets of the old agency were transferred. The MTA was financed under the authority of the Boston Metropolitan District (no relation to the Metropolitan District Commission), which persisted until all its bonds were retired in the late 1980s or early 1990s (check US Census Bureau's census of governments for details), long after the MBTA took over from the MTA. (Many parts of what we now think of as the MBTA system were actually started under MTA jurisdiction.) A good external reference is Scott Moore's NETransit site. Shorter disambuator? How about we move all the station and line pages from [[Name (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority)]] to [[Name (MBTA)]], so the title line isn't dominated by the disambiguator? 2051, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) Having typed the long form seemingly ten zillion times in nearly as many articles, this sounds like a good idea to me! As far as I'm concerned, have at it! (But know now that there will be a lot of links to edit!) 21:26, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) Excellent Resource This site MBTA Resources is a fantastic collection of Boston transit information, down to station by station histories and photos. I suggest it be added to the ""external links"" section of the article. 12:24, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC) If you think so, you're welcome to add the link (no need to ask for consensus on an uncontroversial edit this is Wikipedia, after all!) 12:52, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC) Did it. 00:07, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC) Track connections between subway lines As far as I know, there are no connections, direct OR indirect between the lines. The Red Line MAY have a connection to the Commuter Rail at the Cabot Yard or at a track near Neponset (just north of the Neponset River), but I doubt it. The Blue Line has no connections to any other rail lines. I think the Orange Line has a connection at Wellington, and the Green Line has only Riverside. So there MAY very indirect connections between the Red, Orange and Green, but they are never used except in emergencies (like when the Green Line flooded and Commuter Rail trains served Riverside). Just checked a few sources. A June 2000 track map shows no connection at Wellington or anywhere else on the Orange Line. Same for the Red Line. Of course it also shows no Green Line connection at Riverside, and I know that exists (but is usually fenced off). The track I remember at Neponset is a dead end (Java). At Cabot Yard (Red Line) and South Bay Yard (Commuter Rail) the two systems are totally separated, lookign at aerials on that same site. So the only one remaining to check is Wellington. Now the Orange Line USED to connect via Everett Shops, as did the Green Line (via surface tracks under the El). And the Blue and Red connected over the Longfellow Bridge, and there may have been a connection at Eliot Street Yard in Harvard connecting the Red Line to the streetcar line to Watertown and thus the Green Line, but I'm not sure about that. But at one point the Longfellow Bridge track did connect to other streetcar tracks. And I think I found a connection north of Wellington on aerials at http://www.globexplorer.com/ , but I'm not sure - shouldn't be too hard to spot from the Commuter Rail (harder from the Orange Line because of the unused east track) if it exists. But even if there is an Orange-Green connection via Commuter Rail (and fairly direct at that, using the Grand Junction Line), I would very much doubt it gets any use. So how do you figure all those nice new Red Line cars were delivered from Barre, Vermont? Ah, here we go. Blue has none. Red has one at JFK/UMass, Orange has one at Wellington (last used ca. 1981), and Green has one at Riverside. None appear to be used at the present time. It would be rather misleading to suggest that there are in fact connections. How's this? ""Except between the Red Line and Ashmont-Mattapan High Speed Line, there are no track c +Cement trucks Hi, I wonder if someone could answer a couple of trivia questions: 1) Is there something preventing concrete from hardening in those rotating cement mixer trucks, or are they just hoping that they'll get to their destination in time? 2) What happens if it does harden in there? Do they just discard the barrel, or is there some way to deconstruct it and get it off the concrete plug? Thanks! +"Oh, and for the record – it's ""whose."" " +" Op and LiveF, it's really not that difficult: Wikipedia articles should present the view of the majority of reliable and widely accepted sources. In this case the ICTY, which is also what the article does (sometime word by word, but that's another discussion). If there is a minority view, Wikipedia articles should also present those. In this case the minority view is that of MacKenzie, Johnston & Co.. Wikipedia:NPOV is quite clear about things such as Bias, Fairness of tone and Letting the facts speak for themselves. Maybe a solution would be just call it ""Minorty views""? Regards " +you're a cunt go die in a fire kthx <3 +Have you actually read the text concerning KLT? It says that KLT was falsely accused! Read before you revert!. +How about a reason WHY you support the big 4 not having a prefix? No one has given a reason for that yet. +" I've removed Herron as a brand name in Australia and added Australia to the Tylenol list. Herron is a manufacturer of many products, one of which is ""Herron Paracetamol"" ( )" +A tag has been placed on your article Anna glypta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Anna glypta is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Anna glypta. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. +I cited musical material. But it got reverted, god knows why. I wanted to contribute to making this article better but people need to chill out with the Reverting. It would be better if people would just Look through the actual edit, remove PARTS, and make it better.75.139.103.133 +Pak, just a quick not to tell you to ignore the user David Comley, I know him (unfortunatly), and whatever he says his IP address has been behind vandalism. +, with the original history +YOU SIR! hAVE A TOUCH OF SWAG - SMALLJIM +" Well... And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ""you are always wrong"" are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. I would like to know why Deng removed this message during his last posting to this discussion page..." +" Then include it with references. - ☎ " +. I really hope that you are not trying to delete it when I am being blocked +However given that there is some coverage, I'm going to trim the article and ask that this run through an AfD. I'd recommend pairing it with Rachna Dhingra. (｡◕‿◕｡) +" Hard to get kids to give up their hobby horse. I am too new to Wikipedia to have a clue as to what one can do about a situation like this. I see the need to cover the various theories because were it not for her disappearance and the various conspiracy theories that grew up over the years Earhart would be little known today. What is amusing is that such theories took 20 years to emerge. Aviators of that time had a pretty good idea what could go wrong. I see there is a lock-down about 'disputes"". I feel the facts of the matter speak for themselves, but those who wish the Electra to have unlimited range, and the ability to carry more weight than it did will never be dissuaded by facts. " +2010 (UTC) Yes, like adding to Karl Marx's article that Marx is the link between Luther and Hitler. 12:16, 2 June +"==Kolyma== I came across the Kolyma article while checking out some facts presented in a Danish newspaper article and was surprised to see that it had been marked as lacking neutrality in view of assertations made about the Kolyma Gulag (without reliable references, etc.). As I believe it is extremely important to ensure that the story of the Gulag is presented properly, I have spent a few hours on this article. The main problem seems to be that the author is not too familiar with Wiki editing. So I have begun to straighten a few things out - in particular correct internal links to the authors cited, additional links to the outside world and some footnoting. It would be great if some of the experts on Russia and Russian (Soviet) history could chip in too. There has been a suggestion that the geographical page on Kolyma should be separated from the article on the Gulag. Sooner or later, I think we should do that but the immediate problem is one of establishing the authenticity of the current write-up. I found it interesting that of all the Kolyma articles in other languages - and there are currently 16 (see http://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolima) - only two (French and Catalan) describe the Gulag. Poland has a special page on this. I look forward to hearing from interested parties. Thank you for your effort in cleaning this up. I had several concerns about how these historical topics are reflected in the Wikipedia, in particular: Gross inflation of casualty numbers (I think the current version is more or less ok for that) Use of strong emotional terms to describe an encyclopedic subject, which is completely unacceptable in my opinion. List the numbers, the facts and let the reader do the math. There is a little bit of that left in the current version, but it's probably ok now, too. Biased representation of the camps as working only to destroy as many people as possible, and comparison to Nazi death camps. The goal of the Soviet system was to industrialize the country in 10 years (something that the Western countries covered in two centuries before that), and to prepare for the inevitable large-scale war against countless aggressors Germany, the US, Japan, etc, each of whom has invaded Russia just two decades prior to that. To that end, the most important purpose of the camps was to build the industry that has later launched the man in space and up to this day is in the heart of modern Russia, and to manage to do so in complete isolation and with very few available resources, before getting attacked. The brutality of the methods is very regrettable, but should be mentioned in an objective article along with the actual productive goals of the program, and the benefits the country has reaped, although at a very, very high price. Drawing most of the information from Solzh's Gulag and dissidents' accounts, who most certainly should not monopolize the license for eternal truth. As I mentioned in the page's discussion, eyewitness accounts are important, but not the only one and by far not the most objective source of info. If you record testimony of 227 inmates of Abu Ghraib or Guantánamo Bay, they will say that those places are hell on Earth, the most mercilessly terrorized, particularly sadistic and the most unimaginably cruel human-run organizations, and the whole US concentration camp system is ""evil"", as, they would probably claim, are the US themselves. This alone would not make a good article on Guantánamo Bay. Furthermore, Solzh's book was used as an ideological weapon against the 70's and later Soviet Union to present even the second part of the 20th century in Russia as one endless deadly torture and gulag, which is, of course, a complete nonsense. Given that hysterical overestimation and bias are very common in the West when it comes to these topics, I long ago gave up on trying to thoroughly improve related pages, because every time it sparks an endless flame war with people who tell me about tens and hundreds of millions of fictional casualties, and then my edits get erased or lost in the never-ending stream of b.s. So now I only do minor corrections, and appreciate when people try to constructively research the topic. If the arguments I presented here would help you in your further editing, then good; if not, then Wikipedia will remain a place of hysterical hatred for anything Soviet, especially in comparison to much more mellow and well-researched Britannica and Encarta. I appreciate these comments and will certainly bear them in mind for future editing. Yolanda I've been trying to put something together on Yolanda of Vianden as she seems to be one of Luxembourg's mor +" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mufka (talk) [[Special:Contributions/Mufka|(contribs)]] " +" No need to be rude. The section in this article is hardly what anyone would call ""large"". In fact, it's minuscule. The book is ""The Human Odyssey: From Modern Times to Our Contemporary Era, Volume 3"", edited by Mary Beth Klee, John Cribb, and John Holdren.66.177.73.86 " +" There's no such thing as pollution on a digital forum, dumbass. No one in #memes or #atheism cared about the article being vanity when it was negative. It was only until the article became a regular Wikipedia article and not vanity that I heard the howl's of protests from a gang of gutless thugs who wouldn't dare raise a finger unless they were cowering behind their computer screens. Your ""campaign"" is a lame attempt to delete one article. The ""cleaning up of Wikipedia"". Kind of the ""cleaning up of Germany""? I guess you're glad that clean up failed or you would have never been born. Take your lame campaigns somewhere else. Your mind games are boring. " +So how long will this one last and who am i going ot have ot degrade myself by begging to this time? +" Michig, WP is a collaborative encyclopedia, and this article is not your playpen. You have complete control of your sandbox-why not use it? .Wolfowitz " +" Cedar Meadows A tag has been placed on Cedar Meadows requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. talk.review " +" SOPHIAN, it is not Spencer Wells' website as such. It is just an old National Geographic webpage. He probably had next to nothing to do with that selection of text, which I believe was copied from 10 year old text which FT DNA used to use when DE and E and E-M35 were all still new concepts. It is silly to say ""let him change his site"" if he has appeared in public and explained himself clearly. The internet is full of old information. If you really think everyone is being unfair, then please go and defend your case here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard ? " +" I haven't seen it yet. I'm download the torrent as I type. I hardly ever watch episodes live, because my house is crowded. I'm gonna watch it tonight. ) (talk) " +The civility policy is one of Wikipedia's five pillars. It is a conduct that explains how Wikipedia users should interact with each other. They must refrain from personal attacks (threats, profanity, etc.), especially in edit summaries and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Violating this policy will likely result in blocking from editing. If the user is trying to deal with incivility, they are recommended to use the target's talk page, third opinions, and request for comment on the user conduct. +MATE MATE, do not revert my edits. YOU have BEEN WARNED. No comment. +" Image:Playboy_9604.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Playboy_9604.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ╦╩ " +Newtman, your talking about my bias, laugable. Why dont you take your Jewish/Pro Israeli/Anti-Palestinians bias elsewhere, before finger pointing. Your a Jew, like most of the peoeple here, obviously there going to say that, thus you are bias in your opinion (and please dont deny it). Why dont you look at it from the Palestinians POV. All practising Jews would believe it is, just like some Jews believe there not doing anything wrong by continously building illegal settlement! Why isnt there a section on that, its been in the news alot, and israel have been condemned for not stopping it, why dont you talk about that! Your a zionist Jew, and a fasicst! Mind the personal attacks, because you were the one that started it, with your ridicilous response! I think there should also be a section, on Israeli propaganda on Net, by Israelis, which by most likely hood would be funded by there degracefull and corrupt leaders. In fact, there should be a section of that also, Corrption. Countless allegations against the heads of states, not a mention! Im glad im not in a country like Israel, which practises mass punishment, and claims to be democratic under a false pretenses. Why was Mordechai Vanunu kidnapped by the Mossad in Italy! Corruption he fed deep with in the Israeli Admin. Be ashamed! Write about that (Anna)86.139.179.254 +" No - you were a big loss and everyone felt that way. But clearly a watch list is a good thing. It's good to have you back. I'm very happy that Spring is here and the weather is turning nice again. If you have particularly buildings, let me know. Otherwise, I'm working on some non-Wiki projects. I recently sent out messages on Facebook and MySpace, and via e-mail, that I was no longer doing any large-scale Wiki projects. These were mistaken as retirement notices, but in reality it's just that I have shifted my creative focus to other areas. The last round of Film photos were my swan song, to so to speak. I still have a lot of material to upload, some interviews to publish, and an article to write (Arthur Kramer (attorney)). Glad you are here! David '''''' " +|class=Start|importance= | b1 = no | b2 = yes | b3 = yes | b4 = yes | b5 = yes +Rules are same for everybody . Novice or an expert +Good day Sir; I would like to request to review my article.so i know if i need to get more information https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kapampangan_Ku_Pagmaragul_Ku_(KKPK)_International_Inc. thanks and best regards +DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. This archive page covers approximately the dates between 4 Oct 2005 and 12 Oct 2005. Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary. Please add new archivals to Talk:Freemasonry/Archive_5. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. +Hi Slashme! Thanks for the reply, especially in form of the corrections already done by you and a third party! Your difficulties mentioned above should cause me to revise some of the written stuff; ideally the writing should give any non-physicist a reassuring feeling about the list of instruments that follows, while remaining precise for a physicist. But again I don't want to promise anything in advance. As you can see in other messages, I also had some thoughts about the whole article and how it fits into Wikipedia. (By the way, I was happy to have hopefully found an answer to the question that I found unanswered in many text-books: How do they measure entropy?) +thx4thx Thanks Tim, I am looking for someone who will look after my one nomination for the day as I cannot process my own work. If you have time then all help appreciated but deleting or moving my hook in particular would assist me in moving forward the process? +" (copied from Jameson's talk page) Recent Email conversation with User:Dank55 Dank55 wrote: Jameson, why not keep the few hundred articles you've tagged for your wikiproject, and let me work on the few articles I care about without having to explain to people why the article does or doesn't belong to wikiproject robotics, and is or isn't ""low"" priority? It just muddies the water...and you've got your hands more than full already with the stuff you've tagged. If you'd rather we talk about this on talk pages instead of email, I'm fine with that, I thought you might prefer email. Before you tagged the lawnmowers and vacuums, I wasn't thinking a separate project would be necessary, but I can go that way if I need to. Dan Dan, -Yes, I'd prefer to continue this conversation on Wiki talk pages. I didn't know you had personal interests in those articles. I didn't know there were boundaries of what I can work with. The project banner is not supposed to mark territory. It only means those who belong in the project should focus on this article. There's nothing wrong with tagging existing articles that fit current project scope. I really hope we're not getting territorial. A copy of this conversation (I'll leave your email addy out of it, don't worry) is now on my talk page. Please continue the discussion there. J (Copied to talk page). ''talk ♦ contribs'' I have edited Robot, AGV, and some of the articles about vacuums and lawnmowers...not much more than that, related to robotics. You've tagged several hundred articles as belonging to your wikiproject, without editing any of them, at least not the ones I'm watching, which is most of them. I'm not criticizing you...I think it's possible that tagging a bunch of articles could be helpful, it might get more people to sign up for WikiProject Robotics and share experiences first, and then edit. On the other hand, it might mean that people who would otherwise edit won't edit, out of a sense that the article belongs to some other group, or they might misunderstand the ""low"" priority. I haven't been around long enough to know what works and what doesn't, I guess we'll see. I will look around for some other kind of tag to stick on the articles I'm interested in, and if someone tells me that the two tags are confusing, I'll pass the information on. - Dan " +I recommend removing the enzymes from this page, and just having that section refer to List of enzymes. Any objections? +" Protected areas of Namibi Hi! Graeme Bartlett, In this case, the articles listed in the table have Wikilinks to well referenced articles. Hence, I did not fix references and now I find that I have deleted the file in which I had the referenced text. Now, I may take some time to find all the references and fix them in the article. Pl bear with me.Nvvchar. " +" Well as for Bynes her father's surname doesn't really match either, does it? I find surnames in 2006 can be grossly misleading and don't necessarily mean much. In 1900, sure, but at this point everyone's changed their names and intermarried enough that you can't tell who is what by last name. Why wouldn't Eli's father be Jewish? He's Joseph Cross, also the father of actress Flora Cross, who is Jewish but whose mother is apparently not Eli's mother. There are seemingly a bunch of Jewish ""Cross""'s out there, anyway. Well in the case of footnotes the point is really - the list is called a list of Jewish people - so the most important part is really whether the person themselves is ""Jewish"". The mistake I guess many made before is thinking that the most important part was whether one of their parents or something are Jewish. I think adding a quote about Elvis' ancestry however is important since in his case it is a big stretch and it's for the most part, something that biographers added on after his death, so it would definitely be helpful. But in cases like Bynes, Lauren Storm, plenty of others it's really mostly irrelevant if they are not ""ethnically"" fully Jewish (and besides, that can be found out in their entry), same for the other X-American lists, establishing that someone is Italian-American is good enough, for example, on List of Italian American actors, I'm sure Tina Majorino's mother isn't Italian (with Italians, unlike Jews, you can obviously tell that if someone's mother's maiden name is ""Black"" they are most likely not Italian) but the source just calls her Italian, so that's good enough for us. Family tree stuff isn't the most important. Plus - of course - most of the quotes in the numbers for people who are half already say they are half - but I'll go over them below here. As for practicing Judaism - well of the people who are half and whose one non-Jewish parent didn't convert in the 1980s - LaBeouf was raised Jewish/practices and the source quoted says he is Cajun also, Scarlett wore a Star of David to a bunch of events, Jake Gyllenhaal was raised Jewish, and the quote says he is only Jewish on his mother's side anyway, Grey raised Jewish, Flynn's mother apparently converted, Feldman raised Jewish and the quote says his mother wasn't, Carter quote says his father is Jewish only, Bynes says she is ""Jewish"" and we don't even know which parent (actually for the longest time Wikipedia, under someone's assumption, had ""Jewish mother"". But this was removed once I came in and started purging these assumption games other editors played and started putting in only verified facts )), Bilson quote says she is half Italian half Jewish, ditto for Baldoni, Paxton quote says all we know, that she is Jewish (maybe her non-Jewish parent converted), Peck grew up with a Jewish single mother, he doesn't know who his biological father was and he was likely Jewish anyway, Prepon we don't know which parent, Reed's brother had a Bar Mitzvah and sources/herself have called her ""Jewish"", Schwartzman - dunno, Sigler mother converted, Thomas raised Jewish, and the source says his father isn't anyway, Vuolo father converted, Wilson raised Jewish, I think that's about it. So, as you can see, for a large number of these, the quote already says that they aren't ""ethnically"" all Jewish if that was relevant. OK, as for JInfo, yes, it seems to definitely fall under ""some guy's website"". It does sometime cite sources, right? But often it doesn't. So I would say, yes, generally do not use it. " +December 2012 (UTC) Well, no. See the list at the bottom. U-110 was captured at sea, as was U-570. Two others were taken but lost. 00:14, 27 +please stop removing things without explaining yourself +Info needed- Do you own a Webbed Belt?, and also, what type of underwear do you wear? +":::::I didn't say anything about fandom or fan site, so I'm wondering where that characterization comes in. And it seems rather bizarre to call following the official credits ""fancruft"". (talk • contribs) " +Glad you are not an administrator. It's good you are not an admin. Perhaps the user who should get blocked is you. +Help me clean up an article hey help me clean up this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_lanka_Armed_forces_Conduct_during_war Please add images, remove unwanted material. thanks. +I do apologize once more to you for my unkind insult. As is traditional among Irish-Americans in Boston on Saint Patrick's Day, I got myself rather seriously intoxicated that evening, which is a lousy excuse as I edit drunk not all that infrequently, but having suffered an unexpected and tragic death in my family on Monday, I was additionally distressed and upset more than I had fully realized. As such, I beg you not to take my lashing out personally, as I was simply suffering an incoherent rage which could have ended up being directed at anyone. Again, I am deeply sorry. talk +":::::::::::::I don't think that tag is appropriate. I am not sure I even understand exactly what is it that you find concerning here. I could agree to a general template, but I see nothing related to WP:NPOV as being an issue.| talk " +. Remember, this is just a place for the swapping of opinions, any decision to block a username is yours and yours alone +hi, are you working for APB? please be aware of conflict of interest issues. +Daniel Hale Williams? The guy was a quadroon not a mulatto. +" You might have (). You also might not." +Please recuse yourself from editing my bio You hijacked an obsolete image that I had removed from my site. Then you posted it at a free photo hosting site. Then you linked to it prominently from two Wikipedia articles. Have you ever thought that I might have good reasons for pulling that image? I complained to the free hosting site, and they took it down within a matter of hours. They know a bit more about copyright law than you do, it would seem. Your antics have earned you a place on http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html Please stop harassing me. +Dear Mishae, how are you doing? you may recall me, you advised me a month ago. Thank you again ) I'm writing you because something strange is happening in the page Neo-Futurism. As you remember, this is one of the (few) articles I have edited until now. Now somebody is deleting paragraph after paragraph... It was an interesting page but I think that his next step will be to terminate it: he has already deleted almost everything in less than two weeks. Too bad, I liked that article ( The last msg in the talks is now asking for help of an administrator suggesting that the guy is using multiple addresses to accomplish a proposal of deletion that it was reverted and that he may have a personal reason to do so... Dunno... Can you have a look? +change/delete what's not appropriate. +I tried Thank you for your starting the Berkley High School article. I tried to leave you a message before, but it was deleted 71.10.138.114 +Request for Sources on Merkey Article I'll wait and serve Wales with the order will take about 20 days. I'll make certain someone if there with the camera to get the expression on his face. I don't want wikipedia, I just want folks to stop the smearing. Clean up the POV in the article or I will be firing all of you. +What a bunch of smug twats these tory people really are. The only good thing about them is when they get into power Scotland will become independent. +Birthday She's born on December 19. It previously said she was born on October 8, so I fixed that. But I can't fix it for the picture so...yeah...just putting that out there. Kthxbye. +" Why has it been removed again? Last I can see, we have two people for it and two against. That's a deadlock, not a ""Yes, remove"" " +I'm sorry to snap like that and call you a nuisance but I have been having to defend myself to everyone and I am currently on the defensive. If I have some time to I will do as you say and look at your contributions and go to your editor review. Again I apologise. All the best, +I've forgotten. I will have to look for the sources. I think you should stress that this was the only opportunity at the time for silver depositors to have their bullion made into US coins. It wasn't like they were doing this in preference to smaller coins (which would make no sense as the dollar was over-weight). +I have the reference listed at the head of the table in .pdf. It is a published paper. It does not have the points listed in the table. There is no other reference by or near the table that tells where the info came from. 69.146.93.138 +3RR RULE That's FOUR for you today already at Saudi Arabia, Yuber. I'm assuming good faith and not going to report you on it yet. Knock it off. +your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded +Deaths in the White House Does anyone else think this information would make a good addition to the article? 11 people have died in the White House. 1840: Rebecca Van Buren (President Martin Van Buren's granddaughter) 1841: William Henry Harrison (President) 1842: Letitia Christian Tyler (First Lady, wife of President John Tyler) 1850: Zachary Taylor (President) 1862: William Lincoln (Son of President Abraham Lincoln) 1873: Frederick Dent (Father-in-law of President Ulysses S. Grant) 1883: Elisha Allen (Congressman) 1892: Caroline Harrison (First Lady, wife of President Benjamin Harrison) 1892: John Witherspoon Scott (Father-in-law of President Benjamin Harrison) 1914: Ellen Wilson (First Lady, wife of President Woodrow Wilson) 1952: Margaret Elizabeth Gates (Mother-in-law of President Dwight Eisenhower) +She is married... http://www.starmagazine.com/news/12903 ... An easy cross-reference on her Wiki page and cited reference will confirm it. Put it in if it is germane to this article, but yes, she is married. 65.67.158.126 +I have a better idea! Add links to the Seasons in the Spongebob Squarepants article! ( ) +I think that you should know that Jehochman's position is not the official one, there is no such a policy.90.179.235.249 +" The use of sic is grossly overused. It normally applies when there have been mispellings or other errors associated with translations. ""American"" IS a proper term when refering to the United States or the people thereof. " +WOW I actually decided to look up your username and now I know why you deleted my post ... Black Panther Party not liking me calling a man what he is ? WOW so obvious you are. so obvious. take a while longer to respond to this one please. Dig yourself deeper. MLK would be ashamed of your Black Panther Party and you know it. I'll refrain from further letting you know how dissapointed I am with you. +Added some info from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. The ODNB entry could probably be mined for more. +is gone because of a big meanie! +Image:Aerotow_launch_MGC.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aerotow_launch_MGC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk +"|rajasthan=yes|rajasthan-importance=}} WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition Note: Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article (Wanna Talk?) - " +" @ You stated: ""Users do not get blocked for content disputes;"" FYI: They do: WP:3RR You stated on the Bitcoin Talk Page: ""Users do not get blocked for content disputes;"" FYI:They do: WP:3RRThe three-revert rule[edit]Shortcut:WP:3RREditors who engage in edit warring are liable to be BLOCKED from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a BLOCK.The three-revert rule states:An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract BLOCKS of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as an edit-warring violation. See below for exemptions.A ""page"" means any page on Wikipedia, including talk and project space. A ""revert"" means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert.The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. Editors violating 3RR will usually be BLOCKED for 24 hours for a first incident. Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times. If an editor violates 3RR by mistake, they should reverse their own most recent reversion. Administrators may take this into account and decide not to BLOCK in such cases—for example if the user is not a habitual edit warrior and is genuinely trying to rectify their own mistake."" " +" April, 2006 Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to New England. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. melmac " +" Nixon's Enemies List I noticed, that you compared former User:Raphael1/Persecution of Muslims to Nixon's Enemies List and would like to note the differences: My article does not list enemies or Wikipedians I do not like. Instead my list documented blocks of administrators I disagree with. Nixon has been president of the U.S. when he compiled the list. There's a big difference, whether those in power create a list of political opponents or ""powerless citizens"" critizise those in power (admins in this case). " +'form GABAergic (i.e., inhibitory) synapses onto Purkinje cell dendrites'—Elsewhere, it's 'forms with'; please check that 'onto' is OK here. 'originate within' > 'in'; please check my rewording to accommodate the repetition of origin... 'Obstruction of the AICA can cause paresis, paralysis, and loss of sensation in the face, and hearing impairment.' I've reworded to try to clarify the application of 'facial'. In the section 'Lesions to the cerebellum', the second para about alchohol abuse doesn't explicitly relate to lesions. PS I've taken the liberty of messing with this para. Double spaces between sentences are creeping back in. (These are undesirable because they can result in 'rivers of white' in the text.) +That is a 100% correct line, not nonsense. Nation and state are not the same. Parts of the Israeli state in includes areas where the inhabitants don't define themselves as part of the Israeli nation. So the 'nation' of Israel covers a smaller geographic area than the state of Israel. It is elementary political science. Efghij's revertion was 100% correct. 20:40, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC) +Dieter Zetsche you should expand the article regarding Dieter Zetsche. +They were duelin', Doolin Dalton Now that I have your attention, could a moderator please delete the protection sign. The school is only known as Phil Jennings School by some who knew Phil 'Floppa' Jennings. Also, the intergalactic badminton team is perhaps what the school is most known for, along with Shane Warne. Partially constructive posts by are being completely deleted. +Hmmmmm, you have reverted far more of my additions than I have reverted changes by you, so by that definition you are stalking me. I am just returning the favour. You are also not answering any of the questions I posted above. Not that I was expecting an answer, anyone who reads your posts can clearly see that you are more interested in being a pedantic prick rather than having a meaningful discussion. +" Symbolism of resignation date It should be noted that Joseph Ratzinger, ex-conscript in (Adolf) Hitler Youth, announced its resignation as Pope Benedict XVI on february 11th 2013, Benedict of Aniane and Adolf of Osnabrück feast dayCaholic online. February fest days http://www.catholic.org/saints/f_day/feb.php. Maybe, this shoud be added in hid biography. WP:SYNTH Close, but there's no conclusion. Not combining sources, just listing two. Just out of curiousity, NummerSechs, why should this be noted? Is there anything beyond it just being a sort of weird coincidence? (talk) 02:22, April 4, 2013 (UTC) Please READ WP:SYNTH which says: Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources. Emphasis is mine. I get that. But what's the implication? He announced his resignation on February 11, and February 11 was the feast day of saints with loosely-related names, therefore...? (talk) 06:59, April 4, 2013 (UTC) Since, I do not agree at all with InedibleHulk & Elizium23's comments, I put also this discussion on their talk page. Everything a Pope does, speaks, writes, acts, etc. is think well in advance on a very symbolic basis. Denying that, without arguments better than a lawyer point of view, means a complete ignorance about the essence of Pope's role in catholic world & over other Christian churches. BTW, I'm French, not Anglo-saxon, learned german at school, (J. Retzinger is German) and I do believe that I have quite an authority to write that, since France is recognized Rome's first daughter. we can just say that it happens to be the same day as those feasts and let the readers draw their own conclusions. otherwise it is WP:synth. I do know German quite well, I have taken 3 years of German classes, one year has been college-level. Aunva6talk - contribs It should be noted that February the 11th, Catholic Church also celebrates Notre Dame de Lourdes a.k.a Our Lady of Lourdes (south-west of France). Another (non related ?) coincidence François-Bernard Michel who co-presides the Lourdes Medical BureauComité Médical International de Lourdes (in french) http://fr.lourdes-france.org/approfondir/guerisons-et-miracles/composition-comite-medical-international-lourdes, presides also the French National Academy of Medicine for the year 2013. He is also member of the Académie des Beaux-Arts, he presided twice, at Institut de France, chair XIII, created in 1998. Very good. Before rushing in with this sort of thing, people should know that ""superficial similarities spawn spurious statements"" and ""capricious coincidences cause careless conjectures"". [Talk] This is neither (A) logical, (B) notable, or (C) in the sources. It is like putting a prediction by Nostradamus and the Aztec calendar together to get a result. Please KEEP THIS OFF THE ARTICLE. >> M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemus • feci) " +" Please answer my questions. It will help clarify exactly where any issue may be. Also please note that there was a change in the layout of the table. There are contradictions and I have supplied secondary sources for those I considered that needed them. If there are specific cases that you consider need clarification, please note them here. I have removed the direct comparison of tropes in the table so as to discourage the eisegesis performed by Ross Nixon. I did not forget the ""but only with care"" clause. This is an inappropriate POV accusation of yours. It has nothing to do with either reading the text or the table. It seems to be similar to that of Ross Nixon who talks of harmonization rather than what is actually written, which is the aim of the table. Until you actually see what is written, you won't read it for what it says. Then you can harmonize if you need to, but the desire for harmonization is POV. Harmonization is an interpretative act upon the primary sources and that would need secondary sources. You haven't explained your claim that ""[e]very cell needs to have a reference from a secondary source"". Can you give a specific examples with some explanation of cells that need references from secondary sources? You have not been able to communicate what your specific issues are, so I fear your lack of specificity is endemic of a lack of substantial complaint. control " +Arbitary removal of relevent links by a self-appointed editor is not acceptable regardless of Wiki policy, sorry. +Maybe if your only knowledge of string theory comes from that Elegant Universe book or TV show. String theory has since seen an expansion in understanding and presented testable predictions. +If anyone could add a map of it, that would be really nice! Thank you! +" I live in Bat Hefer. My house, school of my son and kindergarten of my daughter are just hundreds meters from first ever erected section of ""apartheid wall"" inside Israel. There were continues cases of gun fire into Bat Hefer before Defensive Wall IDF operation in West bank. There was case where girl was hit by bullet in her house, but she survived. I feel that people in Sderot do not deserve to grow their kids under air sirens. I do not want bloodshed. Hamas should not take Palestinian population hostage for their crimes. If you live in Nazareth you probably know both context and facts." +Thank you; I appreciate how you have quickly acknowledged and corrected the problem. Sometimes such things turn into battles here, so your immediate cooperation was a great relief. ) /talk/ +" The term ""massive star"" is not defined until late in the article. It should be done earlier (perhaps in the lede), and I'll try to find a way to do it. The term ""massive"" is also sometimes just used as an adjective (eg ""stars less massive than 0.25 solar masses"" or ""one of the most massive stars known"" and sometimes to refer to a class of stars (massive enough to go supernova the conventional definition). This latter class is finally defined at the end of Solar System#Mass, but was used many times before that. An edit was reverted, presumably because it looked like an edit of someone else's comment due to the change in IP. —Alex ( | talk | contribs) " +" July 2011 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Grey matter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. king (edits) " +" Speedy deletion of NewGenerationGay Associaton Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as NewGenerationGay Associaton, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. talk " +Sharapova notable matches I really believe that this section is completely unnecessary; almost everything written there has already been covered elsewhere in the article (and if it is not, then one must ask the question if it is not notable enough for the main article, is it notable enough to be included on the page at all?). Your thoughts? +I'll consider that a second personal attack on your behalf, . You sure are good at those false accusations. You sure have a lot of proof, don't you? +Wikipedia:What is a featured article?| +I needed a break anyway. Off to listen to Goblin. +Question I noticed you added my name to the entry - sorry about forgetting, and thanks for adding it. The question I have for you is this - will you stand with me in my quest of true neutrality for edits? +2007 (UTC) Important message to you Who are you? Your words and purposes smack of nativity and youth. And..........if you are so NEW to Wikipedia, did you feel the need to wave your bullocks around so soon regarding Russ? Your motives stink of ignorance. Who are you? 01:30, 29 September +4Chan spammers I think you guys should lock this page because anonymous (/b/tards and newfags) may attack this page. +It is clearly correct and only certain people like yourself are censoring the page. 174.54.34.187 +Spelling Please do not make pointless notifications of obvious typos. You should correct them, as I do when I see them. +freedom that must be held dear in this country +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Horsepower. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk " +" Perhaps the briefest report on Hajo Banzhaf's use of Jungian archtypes in his interpreting this card, with a succinct quote fromTarot and the Journey of the Hero would help tie this article to specifics. I've read some Joseph Campbell but missed what he says of Tarot: perhaps the reference could be more specific. In the sub-section Description and symbolism, let's have a clearer, less private description of ""the second meaning of the Word""." +No, the language means everything. Look at the Pokemon articles. They all use the English names because the people that speak the language are most familiar with those names, and ALL of the English-language adaptations use the English names (every single one of them) 07:35, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) +" Recent edit I find this edit wrong and edit summary inaccurate . The main text says nothing about a bloke called ""Eric Holder junior"" etc and this is another clear example of dumping content into the lede rather than trying to get the main body right and then construct a lede to reflect it. No wonder the lede is difficult to sort out. talk " +The odometer on that finally turned over Sam: This is you-know-who. The 100,000 mile tumbler on the odometer of Pinktulip finally turned over and he is blocked forver. You know, they just do not build Wikipeida accounts like they used to. What can I say? The man puts the accelerator to floor of these accounts, never runs out of gas, and everyone is surprised when the engine blows at around the 2 to 3 month mark. Seems like the non-surprising outcome to me. +" It would be more accurate to describe the change to the hyphen as making WP look unprofessional and inconsistent. Just because one admin breached the wp:involved policy, leaping in against vocal opposition when himself a partisan, doesn't mean that the whole box and dice has to be changed to be in breach of WP's site-wide and well-established style guide. I have not yet seen a good case for this, and Kwami's points make much better sense. Are you suggesting that all similar articles should be renamed? There are an awful lot of them. Why is this being discussed here, and not centrally? (talk) " +" The DYK is all yours, -).   " +" You know I am ready, willing and able to defend my contributions. That's why I get upset when reverts are done that avoids discussion that allows people to defend their contributions. Treating me like some kid vandalizing articles is insulting to say the least. I am sure that the idea of reverts and other processed was not ment as a means to censor information since Wiki does have a policy against censorship. Legitimate edits should bear in mind that their adherence to form should not overide the interest of not censoring information.Wiki BADASS Woo 2U " +Link Building strategies Link building is the practice of getting other sites to link back to your website. This can often be done using a wide variety of strategies, such as: Asking for a link Giving away content or tools Widget development Social media campaigns Purchasing links and more…. But first, let’s start with the basic theories… * Why Link Building Matters Whenever any user enters a query into a search engine, the search engine needs to determine how to return the best results. How? There are two key steps: Figure out which pages on the web are related in any way to the query Evaluate which of the pages that relate to the query are the most important Each link to a web page is seen as a vote for that web page. In simple terms, if there are two pages that are equally relevant to a given search query, the page with the better inbound link profile will rank higher than the other page (being all other factors equal). Hence, the need of Link Building! *How Search Engines Evaluate Links Each link to a web page is a vote for that web page. That implies the higher the PR, the more the value of that vote. This is partially true. But, two votes may not have equal weight even if they are from same PR page. Value of vote depends on – Relevance and Authority Now let’s take a deeper look at these factors… * Relevance Factor Theme of the linking website Purpose of the linking website Topic of the linking page +Hello Sup you chodna gimp? +It is definitely not the 3rd or 4th largest as both the Hassan II Mosque in Casablanca and the Faisal Mosque in Islamabad are larger in terms of covered area (prayer halls) and their courtyard capacity. Sheikh Zayed Mosque is jockeying for 5th or 6th place with the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, which continues to have the largest courtyard of any mosque in the world. The covered are of Sheikh Zayed Mosque is larger than that of the Badshahi Mosque but it has a smaller courtyard. For now, it should stay in 6th place until it's area and capacity is proven. +Conflict of Interest You are not supposed to be editing the Jonathan Mitchell article as you are a personal real life friend of his. Please familiarise yourself with conflict of interest rules to confirm this. +" MfD nomination of User:Planet Herald/Adoption HQ/Adoptees area . Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Planet Herald/Adoption HQ/Adoptees area and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of talk with me " +i have no idea what your talking about, i just got on this computer +" Alright thanks for your tip, now why don't you concentrate on that Comics Wikiproject of yours and I will concentrate on not getting myself blocked, and then we can all be happy. GorillazFan " +So what was Cheney's role in all this? Check this out.... +Dear Asbestos, I thought admins could unblock themselves. I've done it before, but found that I couldn't today. Anyway, it was such a ridiculous ban it was hardly worth commenting on. I admit I shouldn't have sworn, but Ed's action was completely out of proportion and a deliberate escalation. And anyway user:Thryduulf had already told me off, politely. I didn't realise everyone was so bloody sensitive. — Dunc|☺ +why did you delete my page on exhaust modifications? there was no personal attack involved. thanks! Wolfgirl +" Well, that was interesting reading indeed. Note that " +Wetodid is obviously stupid and knows nothing about American history. White people invented the one drop rule to acquire more black slaves. Anybody with a brain and knowledge of U.S. history knows that. What an idiot. +" Well again, Lord King, that is YOUR OPINION. Your beloved 3RR says ""What counts as exempt under NFCC can be controversial, and should be established as a violation first."" You have not established that the image is a violation anywhere outside your own mind. I suggest you put it back unless you want to face your own edit warring charges. 70.226.167.68 " +" 76.23.169.18, I ask you to do me a simple favor. Please go back and read ""your"" version of the article you posted earlier. Then read the current version. Can you honestly say that your version reads more neutral and balanced than the current one? If so, then I'm sorry, but you are delusionally partisan. But I don't think you are, you seem to have common sense, and I think you see the difference. I'm not saying the way I've written it is perfect but I think it's a lot fairer than the way you edited it to be. Not that I really blame you, since it seems you are more invested in to one side...despite what you think, I don't have any significant relationships with Democrats in Debicella's district. But that's beside the point...I just hope you see what I'm trying to get at and consider that maybe, just maybe, you are trying a little too hard to clean this thing up for Dan. If you continue to make any major edits to the article as is, without good cause and sources, I will continue to revert those edits, which will inevitably lead to it being locked and administrators having to babysit us again. Let's try to avoid that, shall we? 64.252.251.75 " +" Question If an article is changed about 20 times a day, 15 of those by unregisted users who provide mostly provide invaild information, are awful at spelling and formatting. Should a ""Editing by unregistered users"" (block thing), be placed?" +Hello and I thank you too! +" Got your note. You can reply to everything here as I'm watching your page (don't get paranoid about this!). The CNN thing you mention is ""rich media"" and unlikely to be permitted. I doubt that it adds much anyway but, as I am profoundly dead, I have no way of telling. Equally, a magazine cover is not useful as a source, although the story contained in the magazine may be. Huffington Post is ok as far as I know. The Examiner reference you used is blocked by wikipedia - unreliable to the umpteenth degree, I presume (I believe the the NY Post has a similar problem). Suggest for starters you copy/paste here the link to the Huffington story & I'll take a look at it. If it is ok then I'll show you how to format it correctly for use in the article. I know all this must seem daunting but stick with it: I guarantee you it really does all fall into place pretty quickly & you'll surprise yourself about how soon you move from being a total newbie to someone who can find their way around at least adequately. - " +" There's always one guy who'll say, ""Meh, close enough."" I suppose I'm him, here, but, at the same time, you're absolutely correct. The Ayenbite that has been requested is another such instance. (I think with Layamon the argument is sometimes that it the consonant became /y/ in his case, so modern editors feel like they're helping readers by making him more obviously Lawyerman. All such things are excuses, though.) Given that we are always already out of compliance with some browser or OS (e.g. does anyone know how far ""Windows MediaCenter"" or ""Longhorn"" are going to shove the old fonts out of whack), the kludge-y but best solution might well be to use an unusable typographical symbol (*, ^, #) and have a ""Key"" that indicates that that symbol was used for the yogh. That would be the most honest way to do it, but it won't give the uninitiated any way to understand it. They won't attempt to read it in their heads (assuming they can read thorn, eth, and ash now). I just don't see how we can chase down the horizon with the reverse Procrustean effort of fitting everyone's bed at once. " +Please do no remove semi-protection tags from articles Please do no remove semi-protection tags from articles Please do not remove the semi-protection tag from articles that are semi-protected. Doing so does not remove the protection from the page but does mislead editors. Thanks, +Carpet bombing I am removing the claim that strategic bombing (especially during World War 2) constituted mass murder, since this is a highly POV claim (specifically, pro-Nazi and anti-Allied POV). 67.169.177.176 +. Where did you read she only registered her Portuguese birth certificate at the same time she got her Portuguese passport? +Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2014 The exact release dates for Minecraft: PlayStation Vita Edition has been announced as follows. Please change the infobox to reflect them: North America: October 14, 2014 Europe: October 15, 2014 Thanks! 209.212.5.67 +" Happy Birthday! Happy Birthday, , from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ) talk " +question?, it's only about your undies. By the way, I wear silk boxers. +Civility I think you should be a little more thick-skinned about civility. Saying you won't respond to perfectly legitimate arguments because an editor accused you of sophistry doesn't really help the consensus-building process. Honestly, I do not think any of the comments you have labeled personal attacks even come close. Reacting the way you do actually does more to create tension with other editors. +" First and foremost, stop removing the information from the article. It is relevant and sourced. It doesn't matter if you don't like it. If you can find something from a reliable source saying that the band rejects the labeel, then that deserves a mention, but that still doesn't mean the information should be removed. Bands don't get to decide how others describe them, and fans and media have overwhelmingly referred to HORSE the band as nintendocore. Edgar Degas rejected the term Impressionism, just as Albert Camus despised the label of Existentialism; it doesn't change the fact that Degas was an Impressionist and Camus was an Existentialist. (speak) " +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Geocaching, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." +Userfication Request Could I have a copy of the deleted page Improvised Comedy Ents for the purpose of possibly raising it to an acceptable standard? – (talk • edits) +":oh wow, at last someone bothered to link me to said suspect info. but thanks. however $50 billion? that is way too high a figure. I think $20 billion is much better. I did take note that even you sided with my points on that page you linked me to. this isn't so much about me being right as it is that I am defending the rights of the masses (even if I may happen to be a genius) against pseudo-intellectuals who don't even know enough. better stated, the people you mentioned (the five)... well, one agreed with me. another one is from Bermuda and you would think he understands the absolute terror that must be felt to live on an island and have a hurricane visit (whether it is major, top, mid-size, or whatever other dimension). suffice it to say I have been in one of the TOP hurricanes and I will not just let you guys dictate things or spout foolishness. in reply or summation: the casualty count is a factor but that is Third World biased. not a good enough criteria. effects: I think you should go take a few polls and find out that you are incorrect. in conclusion I am not debating the merits of a weather ""court"", which I think you guys are trying to establish in some fashion. however while I praise your dogged diligence to get every thing (dot and tittle) correct in extremely minor or low-level value articles, I am somewhat castigating you for your failure to get the big picture on things. anyway, go ahead and be misled, I didn't think I could prove my points to people who are not aware enough. 206.174.72.112 " +do you have a life at all or do you just down all day doing this? Thats sad man SAD!GET A LIFE!!!!! +Seems like a nice racket to sell almost the same kit to the healthcare industry at a much higher price. +It was just a question. Probably the Americans take their queue from England or Hello magazine. Thanks. +In the fourth and last spider man they are going to kill off at least two of the main characters. Who knows who will survive??!! +FWIW, I am going to get around and make an article list like the one at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anglicanism/Encyclopedic articles and other similar lists for other religion projects, for Judaism, based on one of the more reputable, shorter, reference works. Unfortunately, they take a few days to prepare, and those lists are based on having availability of a given reference work for several days, and I just haven't gotten to it yet. But I think when such a list is presented to the Judaism WikiProject, that might help some organization of the material. +They have none. The users inserting such information are doing so only to satisfy their own personal agenda. +" Learning to live with reality Don't show your genetic history by making edit summaries like this one. ""even better start to learn to live with reality"" You might have won the battle to insult my caste, but remember it is only because the other two are supporting you. Without them you are not worth anything. " +February 2009 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. +I don't care as much about being blocked as I do about being able to get accurate un-biased information from Wikipedia. If I can't even edit a page to make it more accurate then what good is your business model? If I can't contribute to a talk page without the threat of being blocked, why should I waste my time with this site? I still haven't seen a decent explanation as to why you think it is an attack ad. All you do is hide behind your policies. +Pathoschild, is this RfC stuff supposed to go on forever or what? How does it end? (Oh, God, will it ever end?) +death Nothing in here about his death. I seem to remember he died in poverty and his work wasn't recognised until later. +Ark Thompson Who the fuck deleted this?!I need fucking research for my stories you fucking douche(Who ever did it) +I have deleted the image of Shiva altogether for the reasons cited above. A good illustration of dreadlocks in antiquity would be great. Again, the Samson image is only somewhat better, because at least the beard appears to be in (sort of) Shirley Temple curls, if not dreads. I would have preferred to leave that image in place until a better image could be found, but another contributor stubbornly insists on deleting it despite the fact that a photo related to dreadlocks in India is already part of the article. Unfortunate. +Avenged Sevenfold is a gay poser metal band. The guitar solos sound like monkey farts and the solos and riffs sound like trash. Aids7x is the worst band of all time! 71.74.76.40 +Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions. Your edit includes new external links. These may be much welcomed links to references. Please note that the no follow HTML attribute is applied to external links in Wikipedia, instructing search engines to ignore these links when computing page ranks. For information on our standards for adding links, please see our External links Guideline. To help protect against automated spam, please enter the words that appear below in the box, without any spaces (more info) +Nomination for good article status on hold The article could use more images, considering its length and subject matter. A map would help to tie in the list of team members. Aside from some minor grammatical fixes the lead section needs expansion and improvement; essentially it should be a brief version of the article itself so try to mention the teams, some specific experiments/explorations, Roald Amundsen, etc. too. This also applies to factors contributing to the failure, which should be mentioned rather than referred to another article. Otherwise the article is very close, so I'm putting this on hold. +Seven Liberal Arts and Astrology Dantes associations do not appear to be correct, according to this link. the Moon resembles Grammar Mercury may be compared to Dialectics Venus may be compared to Rhetoric the Sun may be compared to Arithmetic Mars may be compared to music Jupiter may be compared to Geometry Saturn may be compared to Astrology +" The case for templates Articles should have templates to avoid the type of flagrant bias that is evidenced in this article. Compare and contrast the opening paragraphs of this article to say Fahrenheit 9/11. There are no ""reviews"", no mention of conservative or liberal or other reception of Michael Moore's work. Oddly enough according to WP Michael Moore produces films, but Ben Stein produces propaganda. And you have the gall to take yourselves seriously! BAH HA HA AHA HA! 72.205.37.144 " +" The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie I will be glad to look at it again, but it will take me a few a days. DO you want the comments on the talk page? ><>°° " +First coupé convertible I've changed this to the Peugeot 401 D Eclipse of 1934. There were also the Ford Skyliners of the 1950s, I imagine. 08:20, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC) +Afd See here. You had to know before you submitted this page that this would never meet our standards for notability or reliability. +The benefits section is small because, just that the benefits of compulsory education are small. 199.117.69.60 +I know, I've been incorporating that into the articles as I've written them. (talk) +"Thanks for experimenting with the page User:Galis on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. 123 (talk) " +" ""Given that you (I) are persisting in the same line of edits that got you blocked as )" +a extreme case of genatal herpies from water. +Dear Dianna Unfortunately politics has interfered in my recent edits on Northern Cyprus. As a Turkish Cypriot I have volunteered my time to improve and expand the article on Northern Cyprus with my sources been taken from websites based in Northern Cyprus. Some of the information I added was changed around and improved in a way so in which it can be understood. If you could compare the information with the original it is quite different with some sections using different wording and such. I was ready to negotiate with Dr.K and was even prepared to alter the section into my own words. But unfortunately it wasn't enough. The dispute initially started with GiorgosY who is now banned from editing. Many attempts to vandalize the page where made by this specific user over the past few weeks. Attempts to delete, blank, and vandalize the page was also made by various other users disagreeing with factual well sourced information which has been taken from archives and books written by professional historians. I would like to state that Dr.K deletion of the sections on Northern Cyprus where politically motivated. As a regular Wikipedia reader and editor I will be very disappointed if information which doesn't suit the specific nationalistic interests of users is deleted. Thank you! Regards +" RfD nomination of Jimmy Whale I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. (talk) (contribs) " +"It's really very difficult to let you down gently, because I find myself accused by you of edit warring which I totally reject. I understand that you might be doing it to pacify Tiamut but it’s unfair to do it at my expense. If I should speak softly then the above wrong image of me might stick in someone’s mind, which is unfair to me. This version that you are reading is a toned down version of the original. If I still hurt you (HG), then I apologize, as my intention is only to clear a wrong image of me in your mind and by extension in the mind of others. I'm sorry to say, but you're totally off base. I'll take it that you haven't followed the sequence of events and are totally unaware of who edited what. If you would have checked out the exact sequence of events you couldn't have come to such conclusions and made such comments. Frankly, I am very disappointed in you trying to equate us. While my reputation is unblemished and everyone who has followed me here knows that I'm here to add my knowledge on Jewish subjects for which I have barely scratched the surface, and although I am bold, I go out of my way to be fair and uphold the neutrality of Wikipedia. Tiamut on the other hand has one agenda, and one agenda only; to push a Palestinian POV. I'm sorry to say, but your trying to put her in a good light rings hollow. Please check out what many other editors have said about her and then tell me if you still think so. Sorry I cannot sit back and watch you trying to equate us. By equating us you are actually smearing my character and exonerating her which is really not fair. It seems to me that she cannot do any bad and I cannot do very much good; that's the impression I get from your comments. Here are some things you say which I find incorrect or disturbing. The reason I am calm is because I have given up on her, given up on the mediators, and almost given up on Wikipedia. Only people who think that they can win or accomplish something are passionate in what they do. I'll talk straight and pull no punches. I made my comment on your page only to show you that Tiamut is lying, in the belief that maybe you’ll open your eyes. Tiamut hasn't gotten under my skin at all; I know what she is up to and want to stop it; but if you (not you necessarily) will try to stop me instead of her, then I'll bid all of you good bye and let you have what you deserve. I have no softer way of putting it, that I just can't take this crap that Tiamut thought it reasonable to add ""nation"" to the opening paragraph. No, she knows exactly what she is doing and such comments are what lets her get away with it. While Tiamut has lost her temper many times; I haven't lost my temper even once; disappointed, yes; lost temper, no. You say that you're surprised that Tiamut didn't go to the talk page earlier; I wonder why you're surprised; don't you see that she first tries to get away with whatever she can, then she'll engage in talk with no intention of compromising but to get part of her pushing accepted and put off the rest for another round. You say that I started my conversation with a negative touch by its heading of POV pushing. My purpose is not anymore to set her straight, which I have already given up. My purpose is to point out her POV pushing to all of you. Actually I think that I'm treating her with kid gloves compared to how administrators would have dealt with her, if they only wanted to. Lastly I completely object to your equating us both as edit warring. When one side explains, but the other side says one thing on the talk page and does something else on the article; then the explainer shouldn't be labeled an edit warier simply to be able to play the equation game. Please get it straight; I am an honest editor and she is a POV pusher, and the twain doesn't meet. She needs to be admonished not mediated; you cannot mediate with someone who will only play the game of mediation with no intention of good faith editing. Her response to you is a game which allows her to do what she wants while she is engages in dilly-dallying and in false placation. Tiamut has learned to play a game with all of you. She pretends to engage in discussion but in reality does what she wants and then has the audacity to reverse the sequence of events to make it look as if she thought she was doing the right thing. Now watch her threaten that she will report me; that's also part of her game, and if she succeeds then Wikipedia doesn’t deserve any better. It's time to call a spade a spade; because otherwise Wikipedia will lose its valuable editors and stay with the crap. I’m really fed up with Wikipedia, and ready to bid everyone farewell. " +"== Suggested Merge == I'd like to suggest that this article be merged with ""Siren (noisemaker),"" but I just don't know how to do it or if non-staff even has the authority to merge articles, or even how they'll end up and how to clean them up once the merge is done. But wouldn't you agree that the merge should happen? " +Bargo Rural Fire Brigade +" By clicking the ""Save page"" button, you agree to the Terms of Use and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL with the understanding that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient for CC BY-SA 3.0 attribution. Feel free to call at 704 in this wiki for more questions, Thank You!" +Thanks Thank you for the improvements you made on the Εugenios Eugenidis article while I was WP:Bitten by Fut.Perf. It's nice to see that there are users willing to help out a rookie. I would also appreciate it if you could take a look on my latest edit to the article. +Consensus can indeed change, but it isn't going to in this case. Olbermann went to Cornell, and that's that. It would be extremely unusual for a BLP to document which particular college of a university an individual went to unless it was notably significant in some way. In this case, it is not. Continually bringing this up is becoming disruptive. +Well worth reading I read this book a few years ago, and was impressed with its scope. Just as important, I feel it portarys much of the complexity of the world in recent decades and suggests some major factors that have contributed to the shape of the post-cold war world. The prose is of consistent quality, and to be honest, the book is worth reccomending even just for its coverage of the cold war. I would probably think well of a history professor that would include this book as reading for a class. Joe, U.S. +i dont know wath to say +Proposed Deletion I created this article because Robyn E. Kenealy is a notable member of the New Zealand comics community. I agree, a lot of the subsequent edits since my original ones are puffery, and look like they are by the same anonymous person. The article I wrote was fairly minimal in detail (see Robyn_E._Kenealy&oldid;=191510307), but my original edits were well sourced. I am particularly concerned that Cameron Scott does not recognise New Zealand Comics - Comics.org.nz as an authoritative source because it is an open source wiki. This website is the authoritative resource for information about New Zealand comics. While individual contributors can add their information to this wiki, content is stringently moderated by Funtime Comics's sysops Darren Schroeder, Ruth Boyask and Isaac Freeman. The website has also won awards for its content. This is an important issue because if you set the precendent in this article of saying comics.org.nz website is not authoritative you are undermining comics culture in New Zealand. +It would seem so. Strange that there is no reference to her death online, I would have thought it would be mentioned somewhere... +"== Hey bobo == It's rofl falafel " +Go away Noone missed you while you were gone, you horrid piece of shit. Now piss off and DON'T FUCKING EVER COME BACK 94.13.115.200 +" SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO No. 98SA447 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE January 25, 1999 IN THE MATTER OF FRED BAUDER EN BANC ATTORNEY SUSPENDED Linda Donnelly, Attorney Regulation Counsel James C. Coyle, Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel Denver, Colorado Fred Bauder, Pro Se Crestone, Colorado PER CURIAM In this lawyer discipline case, a hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board. The board and the panel recommended that the respondent, Fred Bauder, be suspended for thirty days, be required to petition for reinstatement, and pay certain costs before again being allowed to practice law. We accept the recommendation. I. Fred Bauder was licensed to practice law in Colorado in 1976. He failed to answer the formal complaint filed in this case and the hearing board entered a default against him. The allegations of fact contained in the complaint were therefore deemed admitted. See C.R.C.P. 241.13(b); People v. Paulson , 930 P.2d 582, 582 (Colo. 1997). Based on the default and the evidence presented, the hearing board found that the following had been established by clear and convincing evidence. On July 14, 1997, we publicly censured Bauder for soliciting for prostitution during a phone call with the wife of a dissolution of marriage client. See People v. Bauder , 941 P.2d 282, 283 (Colo. 1997). Bauder was ordered to pay the costs of that proceeding in the amount of $2,058.97 within thirty days of the date on the opinion. See id. at 283-84. He did not pay the costs as ordered, however, or file a motion for an extension of time to comply with our order. Moreover, Bauder failed to respond to a letter from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and has not explained or justified his noncompliance with the order. As a result, a request for investigation was filed against him. Bauder did not respond to the request for investigation. The hearing board concluded that Bauder knowingly disobeyed an order of this court in violation of Colo. RPC 3.4(c); and that his conduct also violated Colo. RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) and C.R.C.P. 241.6(7) (failing to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation). II. The hearing panel approved the board's recommendation that Bauder be suspended for thirty days, be required to petition for reinstatement, and as a further condition of reinstatement, demonstrate that he has paid the costs incurred in the 1997 proceeding. Under the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (1991 & Supp. 1992) (ABA Standards ), ""[s]uspension is appropriate when a lawyer knowingly violates a court order or rule, and there is injury or potential injury to a client or a party, or interference or potential interference with a legal proceeding."" ABA Standards 6.22. However, disbarment is warranted when a lawyer ""(a) intentionally or knowingly violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order and such violation causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession."" Id. at 8.1(a). The 1997 public censure is an aggravating factor for analyzing the proper level of discipline. See id. at 9.22(a). Other aggravating factors include Bauder's refusal to acknowledge the wrongfulness of his conduct, see id. at 9.22(g); his substantial experience in the practice of law, see id. at 9.22(i); and his indifference to making restitution, see id. at 9.22(j). Because Bauder did not appear at the hearing or offer any evidence, no mitigating factors were found. The lawyer respondent has defaulted and apparently ignored the disciplinary proceedings. We elect to accept the board's recommendation. See People v. Rishel , 956 P.2d 542, 544 (Colo. 1998). We are satisfied that the requirement that the respondent undergo reinstatement proceedings and demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he is again fit to practice law will adequately protect the public. Accordingly, we accept the recommendations of the hearing board and panel. One member of the court, however, would impose more severe discipline. III. It is hereby ordered that Fred Bauder is suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, effective thirty days after the issuance of this opinion. It is further ordered that, prior to seeking reinstatement a +Why has my article been put up for deletion. It is no different from all the other lists to do with British music statistics. I started at 40 weeks as not many uk singles reach this milestone; would it be better to put 52 weeks instead? This is no different from the Biggest selling British acts of all time list starting at 50 million sales, surely this and hundreds of other lists are meaninless then also? +I've proposed a merger, since the articles are about the same person. I'm not sure which spelling is correct, though. +Also, Churches Mansion was featured heavily in a recent episode of Most Haunted:Midsummer Murders, when the fake ghost seeking crew walked around Nantwich making things up more so than usual +Sorry- fairly new with this- is the attitude neccessary?Tim Foxworth +", 13 August 2015 (UTC) thanks, but I think this does no more than does searching for ""linksto:Berry -hastemplate:XXX"" where XXX is a named template. I wondered if there is a way of excluding links from all templates while still finding links in the text. Presently I'm working on ""linksto:Berry incontent:Plantae"" which finds a lot of plant articles in which the ""berry"" link should be to ""botanical berry"". 08:34" +think twice before presenting +Account has been blocked +You are technically correct though Bligh as commanding officer would have received the courtesy title of captain when being referred to, and would have been known as 'the captain of the Bounty', though he did not hold the rank of post-captain. 'Commanding officer' seems reasonable to avoid any confusion though. +I removed it from the article because I supplied it on the image. I am not violating anything, what is your issue why did you remove the rationale I supplied on the image page. I am going to report you to an aministrator if you don't stop with your destructive unexplained edits edits. You have no right to remove my fair use dispute. +WP:SOCK All wikipedia editors should be familiar with this policy. My suggestion to you is to read it and to follow it. kind regards +Why is your name January? It's a pretty shit name. +Listen Drakhan, comunity justice has no official tie in to wikipedia, it says so on the Comunity Justice page! So back off, u have no power over us or our site! So knock it off! Friend of the MoL admin! Stop peging them, all the other sites on wiki are used for advertising also! The MoL link breaks no rules on the external links page, so forget it! +R-Kelly]] vs. [[Kelly Clarkson +Blocking IP addresses is futile. It's just one guy who keeps coming with a different IP address each time (must be his ISP). Your best bet is to just restrict editing to registered users. Also, I resumed reverting because I felt the issue had been resolved in the various Talks. I didn't just edit war out of hand, I discussed the matter with other editors and waited for their opinions. +for my Jewish tastes +Excuse me, but you have no reason to state that I was making a personal attackk upon you at that time. Maybe if you were willing to enter into a mature discussion rather than beguilingly handing out warning upon warning (as your warnings suggest is done) then your personal attacks upon my private space & actions would be stopped. So if you do wish to discuss this matter appropriately, I suggest you dol that instead of handing out another warning - +False This article is factually inaccurate. - Stephen Spatz history teacher G.A.S.D. +Terryeo editing again? Hey..... I saw your observation that the anon IP that recently edited Altered texts in Scientology doctrine was making the exact same point that Terryeo has been making on the talk page... I checked the IP, and sure enough, the anon IP is 65.147.84.76, which comes from the same block of Qwest servers as Terryeo's IP (which he publicly displayed recently as being 65.146.30.209). +The Bloomfield College Sockpupeteer I've been re-researching this case over the last few days, but am going to wait to insert the information and links, in the hopes that in the meantime, the Bloomfield College sockpuppeteer will be blocked. At present, he is up to four IPs: User: 130.156.30.57 User: 130.156.29.61 User: 130.156.29.134 User: 130.156.31.143 +The title isn't. Way to fire off a snide, absolutely useless reply though. The next step is to enlist the aid of an admin. Repeatedly insisting that you're right because you're right means nothing, and isn't the least bit relevant. +A noticebox on the talk page, AND an editnotice above the edit window, are not enough, I guess... Please raise this issue on the article talk page. +U I'm sorry, but, in spite of your (Xanthy's) recent edits to that very sentence, I'm still confused. As I outlined above, it is not clear to me how finding that pigments were typical of those used in the 16th century supports the claim that Goller forged paintings. Here is the sentence as it is now: He adds that the palette is limited to a few dull colours and that an analysis of the chemical composition of the pigments in these paintings, such as white lead, shows that the pigments used in the paintings are typical of those that would have been used in the 16th century. 16:09, 11 December 2014 ( +No section on why people are addicted to painkillers 124.254.78.121 +and is registred to an ISP +IM SICK OF THHIS GUY I WILL BE SILENCED NO MORE THIS NOT VANDALISM SO HE CANNOT ERASE IT FOR NO REASON I AM JUST SIMPLY VOICING MY OPINION SO HA DOES NE1 ELSE AGREE +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dil +hey...if i help you out with your page, can you reverse your vote to KEEP Template:User Fatmouse ? (i'll still help you regardless, but i'd really like to save that template.) +What do you think really is the purpose of media in the society is the biggest question in each and everyone's mind, so lets share something about this topic. +Yadav I have initiated 2 new discussions on Yadav. Request your view on that +" I agree with AfterMidnight that the fact that it has stayed there for a while is irrelevant... just because noone's picked up on it doesn't mean it's acceptable. However, I think your latest revision is fine, and a good way to deal with it. Hopefully the others will agree. I'm still a but unhappy with the last sentence because again it's an affirmative sentence based on a gossip column, but overall I think it is an improvement. User Talk Review me! " +Yes its all a group of F.U.B.A.R American Christian administrators. I wonder why there are no admins from other countries - there is no rhetoric - its a fact .Bloody circumcised assholes. +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Periscope, you will be blocked from editing. 83 +I've used slugs for years and never concerned myself with gc. Its not relevent if you just use ft, pound, slug and seconds (converting to/from other units as necessary). I actually never even heard of pound mass until I came across it on Wikipedia (I'm yet to be convinced that its even a real unit of measure, since its basically equivalent to a pound force on the earth's surface - so why not just use pound force). +Please http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:Alex_Smotrov Thanks78.85.139.170 +" Márquez quotation In The Fragrance of Guava, a collection of conversations between Gabriel García Márquez and Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza, first published in 1982, Márquez describes Neruda as ""the greatest poet of the 20th century — in any language."" That is the original source of that statement, which has been quoted, unsourced, by the Washington Post, by All Things Considered on NPR, and most recently, in the New Directions paperback edition of Love Poems. But how exactly to cite that original source in a Wikipedia article, I will leave to established editors." +max beesley Hi You reverted an edit I made to Max Beesley's page saying he had a step brother, gary. You say this is 'unverifiable'. I AM Gary and I can promise you, we are brothers. Im afraid much of the information is not verifiable but it has not been removed. On the other hand, I think I am verifiable (I look in the mirror and thats me alright!) Please revert the edit +If another admin doesn't come along to delete it first, I'll delete this article within a day or two because it clearly doesn't meet any of the inclusion criteria spelled out in WP:BAND. Having a notable front man isn't sufficient. If you fix it up, let me know. ~ +==Well, well the disruptive editor with a long history gets of scot free and the one who brought it up is banned. I think neutrality is a hoax here. 208.54.35.173 +PICTURE YOUR MOTHER WITH HER WRINKLED UP ASS IN THE AIR!!! GREASE UP THAT POOPER AND JAM IT IN!! (go fuck your mother) You better leave me alone you little runt +Apologies but.... I apologise for any inconvenience/harassment on my behalf, and i assure you this will not happen again. However, the Wiki:ANI case was really not your place to intervene, was it not? regards +Also the second sentence in the intro does not seem to be true (so the whole 1st paragraph is misleading): as far as I can remember I have seen experiments with a lighter gas on top of a heavier one, with the interface behaving as a free surface. A free surface is just an interface between two fluids, which may be a gas-gas, liquid-liquid, or liquid-gas interface. Or, in mathematics and probably astrophysics, an interface between a fluid and a vacuum. One of the core elements on Wikipedia is verifiability by reliable sources. The nice thing of the article as it is now, is that there are quite some footnotes to sources used (although unfortunately either unreliable or misinterpreted by the authors of the opening paragraph). So accompanying your edits with sufficient inline citations to journals and pages in books will be of great help. +Born: May 22, 1924 (age 88) Someone please change this, put in another header below with Died: _______(Place)(age 88). Otherwise it looks like he was born 88 years old, and never died. +" I did accidentally miss some text from my post and have now corrected it. I did not intend to say you were a BNP supporter. I noticed that you had edited the British National Party article recently and that was what I said, and which I stand by. I did not even look at your edit and even if I had I could not conclude or intend to say that you are a supporter of the BNP. If it was possible to read it that way, then I apologise. I have edited the remarks to make it make sense (I see now that it was incomplete). It is true that you and Steven Slater have edited the article about the BNP which is a tiny and insignificant extremist party in the UK. I did find it strange that two people who edit that article should descend and comment on the NPOV issue raised by Jesanj; especially when Jesanj has also mentioned in the past a claim that I did not understand at all until I googled the matter and it led me to a LaRouche organization website. I have no idea if he did get that comment from Larouche or invented it himself independently but this has aroused suspicion because the LaRouche organization seems to me to be an extreme political organization not at all unlike the BNP. There is also another connection I have found between Jesanj's edits and the LaRouche organization which for the time being I will not reveal publicly. Furthermore, an editor who was found to be a sock of a known LaRouche editor and who was apparently editing from a Larouche IP address was actively involved in supporting Jesanj in another edit dispute I have had with Jesanj. That user has now been blocked from editing WP. Here we have an editor (Jesanj) trying to justify that Palin was talking about NICE when there is no evidence for that. And now at NPONV we have a group of editors with editing connections to matters of extreme right wing / Nazi like organizations all seem to wish to see preserved in WP the same thing. An association, no matter how remote and unlikely between NICE and Death Panels. Jesanj also wants to connect NICE and the IPAB! Both are non mainstream (or extremist) views, which is why I keep removing his multiple attempts to add POV bias to WP. The combination of factors i describe is, I believe, a prima facia case for believing that there may not be any independence in the views being expressed by SOME of the editors who have commented on the NPOV issue. The simple fact is that Palin did not refer to NICE as a death panel and as far as we know, she did not even wish to imply that. She has had plenty of opportunity to clarify her comments and not once has she mentioned NICE. The position of the UK journalists is absurd because it has no foundation and as far as anyone can tell, so only an extremist would wish to support that view. To repeat it twice in different places when there is already a reference to NICE as a potential ""death panel"" candidate in the article is taking liberties, and up with this we should not put. Which is why I deleted two of the references and left the third in. " +" Twinkle revert Please do not call my edits vandalism. A simple look would have told you that I was cleaning up the portal. talk " +"== Entirely too much exposition for a game nobody plays == This entry's game-plot/storyline is longer than the combined entries for the plot/storylines of all three movies. A few hundred fans of the game may care about its story, but this sort of overly detailed plot exposition doesn't belong in a Wikipedia article. Smells like fans trying to save a dying game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I agree, though before seeing this section I was going to suggest splitting it off into a separate article to satisfy those who disagree. I think we need a little more discussion and consensus before coming to a decision, however. t Honestly I don't there is any need to ""satisfy"" anyone who is not content with it. The cruft is barely (if at all) notable enough to be in this article. Never mind its own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I don't think obvious personal bias against this (or any game for that matter) should be a motivator for any article changes. —Preceding comment was added at The obvious personal bias of a few overzealous gamers is the reason the article's so bloated with trivial data to begin with. I'm with Ookami, this game just plain isn't notable enough to warrant a chapter by chapter breakdown of its storyline. That's what fan sites are for. Just checked the World of Warcraft page out of curiosity, and even it doesn't have this much detailed story description. In fact it barely has any, and I don't think anyone can argue which of the two games is more notable. Also someone further up the page here brought this issue up already under 'generic story', why is this still being allowed? I play this game, I could care less that the huge exposition was taken out. That was an absolutely ridiculous story summary; most of the people that play the game couldn't tell you half of it. However, to kill the previous, argument, WoW barely has a story, while the Matrix Online's main content and selling point is the story. We don't need a 20 paragraph summary like before. A mention that there have been past live events, as well as a 4 sentence or so story summary, should suffice. I'd challenge one of you to do it, as I don't think any of you know anything about the game in the current state, besides that it is much weaker than World of Warcraft. To clarify my point above, I think the storyline section is very good now, it does, however, need the slightest mention of what has happened. Just for clarification, the game's main selling point was not the story itself, but that the players would be shaping the story, which never happened. And WoW has plenty of story, enough to fill reams of Wikipages, it's just that it doesn't belong here in that great of detail. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a novel. Well, since there seems to be some rough consensus that this is well overdone, and that there has been no real objection to it, and pending the fact that no one with the adequate experience within the game has stepped forward to trim it down and keep whatever are the key points, I'm going to purge it.Talk|@ Per the anon-IP user's objection in the page history of the main article... It doesn't matter. Its that simple. The story is WP:CRUFT, is a broken part of an already barely notable game , and the fact that something cannot be fixed, or that no one is willing to, does not mean you have to keep it in its current state. Sometimes broken things have to be thro +I don't see you warning who has been editwarring and has made 3 reverts in under 24 hours, what to show you are completely unbiased 100% yup yup, no bias from you, you are totally fair and impartial +Oh, bugger off, Kate! +"I will rejoice at the death of this garbage website that poses as ""NPOV"", when in reality it is a platform for people to control ""knowledge"". " +I DID!! I HAVE ONE!!! SOME DOUCHE-BAG ERASED THEM OR WIKI WONT LET ME USE MY SIGN-IN AT THIS COMPUTER. YOU ARE NOT HELPFUL NIHONJOE!!! BUT IRRITATING!!! I DID LEAVE A SIGN-IN NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! just so you can see it again +:Category:Government Departments of Australia I would have thought this was incorrectly capitalised. What do you think? Snottygobble +Hey, I just noticed your comments. If you are unhappy with the nomination, then feel free to withdraw(=delete) it. I did not realize you would mind. +" No problem [T...C] " +Thanks Loopla, Thanks for the tip, and don't worry I completely understood ) Australia2world +December 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) November 30, 2006. +Requested move Requested move Roberto Garcia Cortez → – Common name. , , , . This article was erroneously moved early on from Roberto Garcia to Roberto Garcia Cortez to make way for a dab. . +(talk)/(contribs) +on Dolega-Ossowski Please leave messages here:- +" ST's initiative was geared at editor retention, the way I see it. As he mentioned on his Talk page, he prefers facilitating collaboration than meting out discipline. Unfortunately, there are problems with COI on Wikipedia, etc, and these issues are not all amenable to touchy-feely solutions. Although I haven't broached the possibility before, this case provides the opportunity for a hypothetical scenario. Supposing that the Koch brothers, to whommoney is no object, have some funds allocated in their PR efforts that include Wikipedia. Well, such editors are not going to be amenable to reason, because they would be being paid not to be reasonable. That is simply a hypothetical case that makes it clear that Wikipedia has to have strictly enforced sourcing policies, otherwise even an Arbcom police state will fail. 連絡 見学/迷惑 " +" I agree with you here WMC. The net of his contributions are a positive but his attitude and belief that everything he thinks is right no matter what others think is taxing. When it comes down to it, the only policy he's possibly violated is WP:CIVIL but I worry that his continued bumping of the line (never really crosses it) will chase away other editors to the point where people just let him do whatever he wants. I blow it off but other editors probably don't. The question I don't have an answer to is, do we expect all the other editors to sack up and deal with his attitude or ask him to tone it down a bit. '''Talktome " +Population in 2010 == Reliable sources indicate that the current population of Pakistan in mid 2010 is about 180,808,000 and not 169,000,000. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pk.html http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/population_of_pakistan_in_2010 I think this error should be corrected as their is a significant difference between the 2 values stated. == +Perhaps you could answer my question. +Note Don't impersonate an administrator, as you did here. That's only going to get you into trouble. Man +WP:NPOV is based on WP:WEIGHT. If a person has more press from WP:RS that is of a negative tone than positive tone than the tone of the article will reflect that, otherwise it won't be WP:NPOV but rather an article that is weighted unduly to the positive. +So its bias is actually relative to that of its readers? . +" I am also uneasy about some of your other edits, changing it to say Phillips is a member of the Royal Family (""Autumn did not know until six weeks after their meeting that Phillips was a member of the Royal Family"") - he's not. The changing to calling her Autumn everywhere, not appriopiate for an encyclopedia, should be Phillips (only HRH/HMs should be referred to by first name), and the un-needed attention brought to what some journalist said in a paper about it (and what a PM incorrectly said). This is not needed on Phillips' page (especially as she converted), but on the Act of Settlement page. " +I am Just BOSSOME Love the Batman. If anyone has an Infinite Crisis account, my e-mail is blajoex@gmail.com +|listas=Old Black (Great Smoky Mountains) +" Feel free to re-add the information and include appropriate citations. You're supposed to include citations when you make additions. See Wikipedia: No original research, Wikipedia: Citing sources, and Wikipedia: Verifiability. I'm under no obligation to tag something for sources required; if you want the content included, then you're obligated to demonstrate verifiability by including sources. Also, I ""no"" plenty about the topic. " +" Thanks for the response, and again, welcome! (talk) " +I have updated the information. Thank you. +Stop your nonsense. It is clear that you lack the intelligence to know and identify famous historical han chinese people, so you edited the han chinese page and changed the infobox, changing a famous scientist like Zhang Heng to an actress that nobody in the world cares. +Soviet Version: real? Is there provenance for that one? +Your rollback - 20:20, 19 October 2014 FYI: Nishidani's rollback - 20:20, 19 October 2014 +You are incorrect regarding the further need of a zygote for the supply of material (or for that matter, information) from the mother. There are simple cases where this is incorrect. +" I agree that Israel is blockading Gaza, so is Egypt, but how is Israel occupying Gaza? The claim that they use is that Israel is blockading Gaza, if so why isn't Egypt occupying Gaza? It makes no difference if the UN says they are, the UN also says Saudi Arabia is a decent country as far as human rights is concerned. It's like asking Hillary Clinton if Hillary Clinton is a good candidate. You can't occupy a country if you're not occupying it. (talk) " +Kangaroo, wallaroo and wallaby have the same problem. None are clades. +Looking at [this edit], +Poop sandwich eaten, lesson learned. +Hey Kevin D You like weird music. And why don't I have any classes with you this term, what the hell are you taking ? I have no one to copy from D: +I am the gayest person on Earth, from Boing! said Zebedee +Conspiracy/Complicity Hi, I just posted a message here: Talk:9/11_domestic_conspiracy_theory where I point out that a tiny handful of folks are bouncing from page to page renaming pages and asking for votes on titles as a way to circumvent an ongoing discussion that has been going on for months. Is there a way to facilitate a discussion on one special page to try to resolve the title question that will affect many pages? The details are on the linked page. Thanks for all your hard work. +Request to unblock Matthew2602 Hey Hersfold, myself and other editors were discussing random things on the RuneScape Wiki IRC channel when somehow the conversation turned to User:Matthew2602 wondering if he could be unblocked here. I've known this user for quite some time now, and can vouch for him in saying that he is not a sockpuppet of that user, who neither him nor myself have heard of before his blocking. I think that it is safe to assume that the IP that both Matthew2602 and the sockpuppeteer was dynamic, and used by multiple users. Perhaps other users were also unjustly blocked during that case; who knows. Once upon a time, I woke up one morning in July two years ago, only to find that I was blocked from editing on the only wiki that I was active on at the time, mylegonetwork.wikia.com. That wiki had about 20 active users then, and upon some very quick investigation it seemed that I had been caught up in the autoblock of a user who was blocked for one day for some minor policy violation. Anyways, I got an admin to unblock me and went on my merry way. A few hours later, when talking with him and other users on the IRC, I found out that he lives in the southern United States. I live in Alberta, Canada. We were both using the same IP. Beyond my nice little story, I've known User:Matthew2602 for months. I know that he is a good user with only good faith intentions, and I also know that he would like to be able to edit here again. It would be nice if he could be unblocked without large quantities of bureaucratic pointlessness, but that can happen if needed. Thanks, (Talk) +" DYK Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Eric Brook, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page." +Fuck off Dicksternet you dickhead. +Regarding Actor Anupam Kher's article on Wikipedia Why the hell you are complaining about ruining your talk page alignment are you a girl you or a female who is obsessed with what I am doing on Wikipedia you have to interfere and don't even listen to my suggestion I even don't know your whole name or profession you do. I just think so you are a maid who goes to clean the house of Actors or Actresses. (UTC) +"Once again, wrong. The edit summary simply says dil. Where I am from this is a slang word. It is almost like putting ""sick"" or ""awesome"" or ""Whatever"" or something. Don't assume things. I wouldn't call someone a dildo. I did not come close to saying that. Also, please stop being rude to me. My edits saying ""i love you"" are from the heart and i mean it, i HAD respect for you. If it is a huge problem for your pompous self then i am sorry. I would really like it if you spoke to me as your equal or at least like a human. Thank You Stop being rude to me please. " +"::LjL, carefully read the following caption, which is the ONLY reason why we're having this discussion: ""Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( 68.173.95.177 ) at the end of your comment."" This post is located just above these comments. Would you like me to help you find the exact place on this page where it is located? Or, maybe SineBot can help you find it. Hopefully, you'll find it. You americans are good at finding things, even things which don't exist. 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177 " +" Pet Shop Boys Collaboration Dear. Why do you delete the list of collaboration? it was a lot of work doing the list! This collaboration list is a remarkable part of Pet Shop Boys' work!!! It was discussed on http://www.petheads.de and http://www.petshopboys-forum.com. Further it is verifiable! Its source: http://www.psb-discography.com/ why do you say ""doesnt belong here""???? it does! greets." +" The guideline at WP:FAUNA#Monotypic taxa is pretty clear about this: ""All other fauna, including all other fossil fauna, should always be represented at the lowest-ranked taxon which the article inclusively covers. Examples: Confuciusornithidae, not Confuciusornithiformes; Bullockia maldonadoi, not Bullockia."" For whatever reason, this is unfortunately opposite to the recommendation of WP:FLORA: ""A genus with a single species is treated at the article for the genus."" " +Haha. Oh man CrnaGora...I can just see you now, red with rage, flinging your Pokemon cards everywhere:))) +How could Susan not be the first etymon in Shisu-naga? Although the pink and blue lotus grow there no more, we must associate the Egyptian Sisak with the Elam Susunak and the Buddhist Shisunaga. Variants of his name/title appear all over the ancient world. +SORRY ASS FAGGETT SHUT THA FUCK UP BITCH +The current UNIFIL deployment map perfectly matches the border shown at Amudanan. It appears Israel withdrew to the international border in this region in 2006. Maybe (guessing) Google still reflects the situation before then. talk +[Howe Bridge Colliery]] I am just letting you know I have created Howe Bridge Colliery. +Hey what is wrong with you greeks all standing on line to write on my talk page. The truth really hurts sometimes. +I'm not *fucking* arguing for inclusion stringently User:Eric Corbett, I just said it was notable then I left it. Do you think your behaviour is WP:CIVIL? +" Update I've replaced the dispute tag to better reflect the dispute here. If there is more than just one single source, A good compromise would be to include a range of numbers as oppose to revert warring to include a single source. But the sources would still have to be reliable. I'll check the sources when I get the chance and propose a reliable range. Until then it would be very nice if people stop reverting things. The totallydisputed tag is there and people would probably read the talk page before believing the numbers. Talk " +Restoring the article without consulting the Project which redirected it to begin with can only end up in an edit-war, which is what happened. +Recent Spock edits Hi, just saw the edits you've recently posted. Although I don't necessarily agree with all of them, on balance I think the article is better now than it was a few days ago (excepting the two discussions that I came out on the short end of, of course). And I'm thankful that you didn't revert everything that I'd added previously. +Two for closure at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 November 30 Global University Ranking and Global University Ranking, 2009 are both ripe for closure today, and it isn't so clear cut that I want to bang the gavel alone. I have failed to attract more attention to the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#Global_University_Ranking in spite of publicizing it at WT:C and WT:COPYCLEAN. (The conversation primarily consists of a contributor who says the list is creative and unusable and another who's claiming WP:OTHERSTUFF.) I'm not quite sure what to do with it. We haven't had a good debate about lists in quite some time, and the admin who added the most to the last one has gone inactive. ) Are you able to help out? (talk) +"::Boing! said Zebedee - It is off course a great deal easier to make general judgments about me then to arrive at conclusions by meticulously ascertaining or providing detail . How fair is it of you then to repeatedly denounce my ""confrontational attitude"" on talk pages "" , while completely overlooking , disingenuous and confrontational editing , on article pages by editors you are concurrently interacting with and intervening for . Although you only question the choice of words , your question in a larger context poses a significant question , about the wisdom , ethics and conventions , of unbridled interaction hidden behind a keyboard incognito , with a room full of strange incognito entity's . " +" Opening riff I'm not a musician so I hesitate to edit the article itself, but... I've been playing ""Rebel Rebel"" and Zappa's ""Trouble Every Day"" side by side, and to my ear they open with the exact same guitar riff. Not to mention: same tempo, key, everything. And Trouble Every Day was written in 1965 and released in 1966, years before Rebel Rebel. I guess it could be a coincidence but that seems unlikely. Maybe Bowie heard the Zappa song on the radio & forgot about it, thought he had made it up..." +St Pancras and Islington Cemetery In East Finchley has more people interred than any other cemetery in the U.K. +unlike you tom yes i know who you are O +rot in hell it's low life like you that have put the country in such a state. Thanks for nothing +" Speedy deletion of Wei Weiguo A tag has been placed on Wei Weiguo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bo " +The article already states that there is a ferry service that runs there. Anybody interested in travel would find the company if it is the only one. Remember, Wikipedia is not a travel guide. +" TAB (several edit conflicts later ) I gave it a quick once over, and I'll take another look in a minute, but I think I'll leave my admin hat on for this. (Which also means I, as you note, won't be picking ""sides"".) Atm, I don't see much of a consensus yet, though the discussion appears ongoing. And several of you have agreed to give this some time. Which I think is a laudable agreement as it follows the spirit of ""There is no deadline"". - " +" What you are referring to is the ""Ritual decalogue"", which has its own article, and a whole section devoted to it in this article. It is not what people or reliable sources commonly refer to as ""the Ten Commandments"". (talk) " +Of course not, it's just a hypothesis. I'm am just documenting the previous editors refusal to include Madden's fairly definitive and dramatic PNAS article and results into the primary reference list, as compared to your zeal and bias to include another far less dramatic primary PNAS reference, as a definitive refutation of an already refuted hypothesis that has changed dramatically since it was first proposed many years ago. When any of you can come to grips with the nanodiamond in terrestrial sediments problem, get back to me. I'll be glad to assist. Until then, good luck! I'll be watching you with amusement. +" Heh. I don't really care. I've made some good contributions to wiki. I fixed the unfixable ""unsolved problems in philosophy"" article, the bio for the poet Howard Nemerov, and little fixes to philosophy and math articles. Meanwhile, this clown goes around censoring any negative information about Topalov, regardless of how factually accurate, and I get banned for calling him an idiot? If they want to ban me, then so be it. Let them ban me for life for all I care. I'm happy to mock their ""decision"" and the inarticulate schlepp that is Dionyseus. This is the author of the ""pseudo-penis"" article, who's constantly embroiled in arbitration on some topic or another. The guy whose chief contribution to Wikipedia has been individual entries for every character in ""Dune"". If they'd rather have Dionyseus's intellectual contributions than mine, then I'd welcome the ban. I have to say, their ""civility"" rules show that they're more interested in having a hippy love-fest than actually getting facts straight. The chief ingredient to intellectual honesty, in my humble opinion, is a willingness to spot phonies and imbeciles for what they are. The guy can't even spell [Dionysus] properly, and he's going around editing encyclopedia articles. Pish. " +Issue is now mostly resolved. Thanks to J. M. +J DELANOY IS A MOTHERFUCKER YOU SURE GOT A LOT OF TIME TO REVERT VANDALISM! I WILL ALWAYS BE AROUND TO ADD NEW FAKE CONTENTS YOU FUCKING MORON! HAHAHAHAHAHA +You're fast Ahhahahaha you're fast. Didn't waste any time. Place William Hope's p-nis (the head, only) over my lips. Them I will suck it and he will c-m inside my mouth. +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I see you may be a New Zealander (or at least, appear to be by your edits). There are several NZ related Wikipedia pages. Portal:New Zealand Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand Adding {{User New Zealand}} to your userpage will list you as a New Zealander. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! +Its good that this man is dead. Let it be clear to everyone that whoever insults turkey insults the deep rooted nationalism of turks. SO he went to far, and faced the consequences. I say we have 1 problem less now. +" Kitteh! Here is a kitteh to sit on your lap while you edit Wikipedia. Enjoy! ) " +" So your point is that every time they mention North Pole they don't necessarily mention ""magnetic""? I think you're kind of grasping at straws here, it's a TV show written by people who probably aren't Physics grads (though I'm sure some of the script reviewers are). Really would it have added anything to the episode if they'd specifically said ""Magnetic North Pole"" every single time they mentioned the trip? Personally I don't think so, in fact it probably would have become kinda annoying. 206.47.249.251 " +I don't care. Asshole! +Basically yes. Most, who don't agree with this, just care too much for political correctness. +Someone could discuss some other solutions tooa spin-off that may not look exactly like the Virgin birth (mythology) article. Or better organization for this article. Neither article is or was perfect, although there have been some good contributions. +Listen Please, ma'am, I dislike some of the things you oppose, but there is no need to be so extreme. I am a deeply religious person as well, but you should not be as bad as these impure fools. let them do what they want, and let God decide their fate. Please do not cause more trouble +Questions for a story on Popular Mechanics +It was deleted for a reason, and it most certainly violates outing as it has been made cleari do not want my rl name associated with wiki +" RM notice A requested moves discussion in which you participated in Dec. 2013 has been reopened, at Talk:Mustang horse#Alternative proposal.  —  ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  " +AshwiniKalantri , I have Read the Whole WP title naming policy. I see you are Right over here on the Common Naming Policy which states All these things. But as u also see that the word ICC Cricket World Cup is as Much Common and Infact even more Popular then the word Cricket World Cup itself. As you see the Full Official Name of the Tournament is ICC Cricket World Cup and not Cricket World Cup as ICC is the Main Organizer/Administrator of the Tournament just like in FIFA where all the world cups have been named as starting with their Respective year with FIFA World Cup. For Eg. Like starting from the First 1930 FIFA World Cup, 1974 FIFA World Cup, etc. to the Most Recently held 2010 FIFA World Cup. I have Full Legitimate Evidences to Prove this as you can yourself see on the ICC's Official Website (which is http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/) but some users just want to ignore it. I therefore kindly Request you to do what You, I and almost Everyone agrees that what the Proper Name should Be. I hope your coordination will be Helpful and Appreciated. Thank You +Soszynski/Bonnar The names need to be flipped to Soszynski vs. Bonnar because on ufc.com bonnar is underdog which means names need to be flipped and.. the names need to be flipped. Take care now... bye bye then. +" Portuguese People ""Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people.[5] Medieval and early modern Europeans variously applied the name to Arabs, Berbers, Muslim Europeans andSub-Saharan Africans.[6] The Moors came from Morocco and crossed theStrait of Gibraltar to reach the Iberian Peninsula. The Moors were initially of Arab and Berberdescent at the time of the Umayyad conquest of Hispania in the early 8th century. Later the term covered people of mixed ancestry, and IberianChristian converts to Islam (the Arabs called the latter Muwalladun or Muladi).[7][8] Europeans have classified a number of associated ethnic groups as ""Moors,"" and terms for this are found in their languages. In the modern Iberian Peninsula, ""Moor"" is sometimes colloquially used for any person from North Africa, but some people consider this use of the term pejorative."" From Moors page, well cited" +A tag has been placed on The Rosie Fan Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | Talk +Archived discussion (worth a look!): [[List_of_Jews +I agree. The two Beatrices are completely different people and habour no link between each other apart from the fact that one is the namesake and foster-grandmother of the other. +|} Comments I find it a good idea to merge all these articles into one. Feel free to make that article. +" please continue the discussion at []. talk " +Agriculture, food and drink +" That's fine. ''TalkStalk''(P) " +"F. W. Ratcliffe ""I edited your sandbox"" === Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I edited your sandbox === " +Second XI Close was captain of Yorkshire's Colts XI which played in the Yorkshire League. (see A Sidebottom's book for some anecdotes) +" Hi, I'm the guy that you talked to about leaving a message of the ""rules of snooker"" page. I wanted to post that message on the talk page instead of on the page itself. Unfortunately, when I went to the talk page of the ""rules of snooker"" page, I found no space in which to post anything. So, I was forced to post my message on the page itself" +"::No we aren't. The article talks about ""inserting 22 days before the last five days of February"" the impliaction being that 22 new days were insterted and the days that followed formed a part of the monthy of February. That is an idea I have seen in a number of places on USENET and would imply that (a) intercalarius has only 22/23 days and (b) that the last days of the year (before March) would be part of February again contemporary evidence says no. It may be this is not what the article means, but in that case it should say that February was shortened and followed by Interc. of 27 days (is that what you think it says?). There's no discussion of the additional day by the way. " +I've saved you the trouble of reverting, so now we can discuss on the talk page. +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Catlins, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +" {| style=""background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |- | style=""border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;""| Hello, 78.87.229.43, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! +"Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/eMachines Netbooks was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Talk " +How did i get blocked until 2009???????????????????? +" Thanks. It's fine, you may take your time ) <^>Talk all words " +Remember your friend Total Wanker? +Moldopodo Is Xasha Moldopupo? +(OH NO HOW WILL LIFE GO ON???) +Hey there...sorry if I stepped on your toes. Just to be clear: I'm not a fan/friend of JDiggoryDogg or whatever he calls himself, and think he is, well, a few watts short of a 25 watt bulb, but I can't see how his sophomoric play on Keith Olbermann's name violates BLP. If anything, it exposes JDigg's lack of, um, lotsa lernin'-type stuff. So, again, sorry, if I gave offense. +2008 (UTC) As for the question, if races exist, the answer is clear: Races don't exist, because Spencer Wells, Guido Barbujani and Alan Templeton say they don't. Every other opinion is a misinterpretation of facts by racist bigots. Well, there are few seemingly racial clusters appearing in recent genetic studies, and they very well agree with the classical anthropological division of humans. Furthermore, when geographical distance is constant, the genetic distance between groups within these clusters is several times lower than between groups from different clusters. The main detected bareers of genetic flow are also consistent with the borders of traditional races. Moreover, the genetic distances between these clusters are typical for mammals routinely divided into subscpecies by biologists. However, this all must be due to some misinterpretation of facts by racist bigots, because Spencer Wells, Guido Barbujani and Alan Templeton say that race doesn't exist. 22:56, 22 April +Well Childofmidnight. I'd say you better lock all your doors. Your userpage has been semi-protected which means your back door is locked but I can still edit your user-talk page because you didn't lock your front door. By the way, the nice looking doorway is the doorway to your doom. HAHAHAHAHA! If you want to protect yourself, lock all of your doors before midnight. +Latin was popular throughout Europe during the times when this calender was learned (especially in academia), thus the adoption of Anno Domini (AD). It's possible that it wasn't until later times (during the British Empire) that we really became interested in Pre-Christian history, making BC (Before Christ) an English phrase rather than Latin. I hope that helps! +02:12, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC) +best if their information has been censored +" Time for some recognition I think ... Hi Sorry for my absence over the last few months but as winter is approaching I (as usual) have been sticken by arthritis, flu and travelling. From the end of August my time is usually limited as I have a lot of family events and the bad weather takes its toll on my health. I realise that I could have done more work on the History of Norfolk and now that the family responsibilities are reduced I will probably start to contribute more to WikiWorld than the past three months. It istime I think that your hard work is recognised - you have greatly improved the article, taken constructive crtiticism well, responded to requests and maintianed a completely civil and functioning attitude to editing and so I think this may be in order _ The Content Creativity Barnstar For your hard work, diligence, attention to detail, attitude to co-operative editing and your superb contribution ¬) Hope to collaborate again as I really have enjoyed watching the article grow " +Does anyone agree that sarcasm can not be conveyed? +Anna Wintour Can you provide sourcing information for this? It's a good and relevant fact that I'd like to keep in the article. Is the article online somewhere? +": First ascertainment of truth is that the term ""Glorification"" itself is a tendentious and partial phrase. Its word stem originates from ""apotheosis"", meaning ""to glamourize"" and ""to aggrandize"". But I am not very surprised to see a much more neutral and unprejudiced term like ""Contemporary Reaction"" being used rather a phrase rooting for Shackleton i.e. against Scott, to be honest. " +" Last thing I heard was that he was at ""85%"" and is expected to make the trip. " +Iranian Mullah, Like You You for all intents and purposes just called me a dipshit by removing my completely reasonable comment at the Neda talk page. You dipshit. No one gives you the right to be like the Iranian Mullah just because you dislike someone's views on a matter. 74.233.165.176 +" It came out today, 12/25/15. I'll add an ""In Popular Culture"" subheading at the end of the article for it. " +I could swear it was also a movie with Howie Mandel. Anything? +Great, another Wikipedio editor with an agenda. How refreshing from the usual standards at Wikipedia... -) +DMW Discussion Hello, thanks for trying to keep dwm, please post *Keep in discussion the same way like others for your voice could be accepted. +Block me then you cocksucker - clever people don't give a fuck about editing Wikikpedia? Just because Wikipedia has turned you into its bitch, you can't see that being blocked is not a 'punishment'. If it happened to you it would be a blessing, but you'll never see how much time and life you've completely WASTED, because your brain is mush. Fuckin wretch +Typical. Every time some clown tries to sound intelligent, he goes and uses words he just looked up. That is not intelligent. Having the mind that can reason and not have biases is intelligent. +Ha, what you said was a lie, when you make unsubstantiated claims without evidence, that is a blatant lie and fabrication of the truth, which is exactly what you're doing. You are trying to play arm-chair psychologist with me and infer why it was that I had done something, and accusations are not a substitute to verifiable evidence. I will just leave it at the following, people like all of you is why Wikipedia is dying and why there aren't new editors, and why nobody gives a damn to contribute. I merely started out assisting the citation of the previous content which was not mine, you people seriously need to learn what constructive editing is, you've succeeded in turning this into an entire mess, with the article having less information than it did before any of my edits. Congratulations you've vandalized the article, and with the help of Wikipedia administration! And no I was not attempting to forum-shop, I simply read the Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress article and followed the links to file the incident reports. Edit warring is people like you all who just destroy sections and added citations and do nothing to contribute to the actual content. 72.72.240.141 +"The phrase ""alpha world cities"" only returns 2600 hits on google, but the phrase ""world cities"" gives over a million. The Alpha part is merely to distinguish it as the highest tier of world cities no offense, you can't put most of the other world cities (such as Beta cities Moscow and San Francisco and Gamma cities Jakarta and Minneapolis) on the same tier as NYC. There's a reason why a whopping 47% of americans think of NYC as ""The City""! FYI, Chicago is second with a measly 4.5%. DragonAtma " +" This is just my thought and I have no proof, but I'm thinking maybe he took a month off from ""watching"" me to let things die down and now he is catching up on reading my talk page and seeing what I am doing so that is why it has been a month, he just now read your post. Which, if true, makes it scary that he takes time to do that kind of stuff, what is it about my talk page that makes it like a soap opera to him? What could be so fascinating that he needs to read ANYTHING on my talk page? Can you say obsessed, stalker, and weirdo? But, sshhhh, we shouldnt type so much, he's watching us right now... I owe you a wikibeer if he responds to this and is all ""upset"". Maybe he shouldnt be reading my talk page then. -) " +Please see WP:NOTFORUM. This talk page is intended solely for discussions directly related to article content, and is not a forum for general discussions relating to pornography. +can help with your edits, please let me know. Failure to abide by the conventions of the community, may see you blocked from editing +Hmmm... So you decide not to answer my question huh? Is it because I am Japanese? I knew it! This site is fucking racist. You are a god dam motherfucking racist piece of shit! All you Japanese hating motherfuckers should go to hell. Especially the Americans!. They should go to hell for killing all my people in WW2. Tell me why you are a racist you son of a bitch? I am going to report this to the administrators to get you ass blocked! +the editor Barrak will be famous soon.....grin +Please do not remove discussion posts This is against wikipedia policy, thanks. +"The Starting Point is near Thebes == In Exodus Ramesses was one of a pair of treasure cities or emporia and the first station of the Exodus. In the story there are two treasure cities; Pithom in the Delta and Ra mes ses at Thebes, Egypt. Exodus 1:7-14 And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them. Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph. And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we: Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land. Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Ramesses. But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew. And they were grieved because of the children of Israel. And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour: And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in morter, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field: all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour. If Ancient Egypt isn't something you have studied intensively there may be some confusion about what is a treasure city. A treasure city or emporia is a port where foreign traders can bring their goods through customs. In the 19th century archaeologists made speculations about San el-Hagar or Pi-Ramesses and Tell el-maskhuta or Pi-Athom being the places mentioned in the story of the Exodus. These have since been corrected by trained Egyptologists, but the myths have lived on among ""biblical archaeologists"" and laypeople. See: Baines and Malek,1987, Atlas of Ancient Egypt, Equinox, ISBN 0-87196-334-5 Pi-Riamsese 166,175,177, removal of capital to, 46, 84, 166. Under San el-Hagar ...the temple is a mass of inscribed and decorated blocks, columns, obelisks and statues of various dates, some of them even bearing the names of rulers of the old and middle kingdoms (Khufu, Khepren, Teti, Pepi I and Pepi II, Senwosret I), However the majority of the inscribed monuments are connected with Ramesses II and this led P. Monet, the greatest expert on the Tanis monuments to believe this was the site of the ancient Pi-Ramesses, the delta capital of the Ramesids. Nevertheless none of the buildings so far excavated can be shown to have been built before the reign of Pausanes I of the Twenty-first dynasty of Egypt and the inescapable conclusion therefore is that all the ramessid and earlier monuments must have been brought from other places. Under Tell el-maskhuta In 1883 E. Neville excavated a large brick built enclosure (some 210 x 210 m) with a badly damaged temple at Tell el-maskhuta, in wadi tumilat. (In the late period a canal through this wadi enabled ships to sail from the Nile into the Red Sea) Most scholars, though not all, identify Tell el-maskhuta with ancient Egyptian Tjeku and Pithom, (probably from per-Atum, The ""Domain of Athom"") of the Exodus and the capital of the Eighth Lower Egyptian nome. Pithom is an ancient city in Egypts delta. Its mentioned in Exodus as a treasure city in the same breath as Ramesses. You would have to know that from the Hyksos period onward there are emporia in both the delta and Thebes. In the delta cities like Sais served as ""Treasure cities"" business or banking centers. At Thebes Elim on the Red Sea also served as a business or banking centers for the Red Sea trade in Frankincense, Myhr, Bitumen and perfumes and ointments such as ben jamin or juniper oil used at Karnak's mortuary temples. Pithom and Rameses are located at opposite ends of the kingdom. Pi-Athom is an ancient nome capital (see below) in the delta. Ra mes ses means literally (Ra=sun), (mes=birth), (ses= to guard or observe), the place of observing the birth of the sun, the dawn in the east. During the entire history of Egypt the Red Sea was an important source of the materials used in the mortuary at Karnak. Karnak was where Moses would have gone to get the bones of Joseph Exodus 13:19 And Moses took the bones of Joseph with him: for he had straitly sworn the children of Israel, saying, God will surely visit you; and ye shall carry up my bones away hence with you. Following the stations list, the Exodus crosses the Red Sea between Elim and Elat. Elim, the sixth station, is Thebes Red Sea port. +There's plenty of links proving that 50 actually said all that. I know it sounds unusual for a black gangsta rapper to be supporting George W. Bush but the evidence is there to proof it. +Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (vandalism and selfishness with users) +" As to you first paragraph: Wrong! As to your second: the ""stop outing me"" charge didn't work when you were using it against Will Beback, and it's not working now. Stop using Wikipedia to push advocacy for your off-Wiki censorship hobbies. " +" ← December, now you're moving too far in the opposite direction from MySpacing. Sing your songThe bird's seeds " +Why won't the edit feature work. +... is this the real JK DJs? +you are in violation of the three reverts rule on article George Pendle. You also should discuss the changes on the talk page. Please stop your abusive and borderline deranged behavior. YOU HAVE BEEN REPORTED FOR VANDALISM AND BAD COMMON SENSE +, 23 February 2007 (UTC) If you can find a single source that will say Canada (New France) considered New York State part of their own territory then you may post your link. The burden of proof is on you!! Until you can find that proof, you may not post fictious (or shall I say, your personal opinion based on 'an argument can be made') content and links. 22:45 +The threat is often worse than reality. As Trade Union negotiator, I raised the wages of section I represented to the highest within the company for that particular type of work, across all the UK sites. I never had more than 25% of the section members that I could rely on to take action, but those 25% were vocal, and the other 75% had the good sense to keep quiet. +history of north korean aggression to south korea Are you korean? do you not understand the topic? im so sick and tired of you trying to act like you know whats best or whats black and white. that article is NOT a personal attack. it merely aims to list the chronical events of north korean aggression to the south. so if you dont know squat about korean history, or dont speak the language, i ask you to STFU and stop spending so much time on wikipedia. +You may not be aware of this but a cocktail is certainly a drink and deserves a recipe considering its on the older side of things. +Camera Please add the container, video format, and audio format to infobox and the Camera section if u have info, thanks. +Yeah, what a slip! But she also doesn't fit under 20th century anarcho-feminism either. | Talk +, one which concerned +" Please read WP:EDITSUMMARY and take your own advice. To answer your allegations, insinuations and questions: If you check my contribs, you may note that I'm a slightly busy editor, with far more obligations on Wiki and articles on my watchlist than only Chavez. When you make an incorrect edit, it pops on my watchlist and I correct it. Doing any more for now in the current environment of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:OWN is not possible. When/if the article ever settles down to consensual and collaborative editing, I'll be more than happy to devote ample time to article improvement. As it stands, a well-justified POV tag was placed on the article in February, and not a single editor there did a single thing to correct the POV for months, until the current battleground resumed. You might ask yourself if you have contributed to the battleground or to a collaborative editing environment, particularly with edit summaries like the one noted above. In the meantime, I can clean up ten medical articles and promote ten FACs in less time than it takes to settle one clear and simple cn tag on Chavez. The text clearly says a law was enacted; the cited source cleary says a law may be enacted. The source does not verify the text an updated source is needed. Further, some original research not given in the cited source about the largest bloc in the Americas, was also added somewhere along the line. All of this is clear in my edit summaries, if you will take the time to read them. (Talk) " +this is your final warning. i am a fag. yeah thats right i'm gay. i am a wikipedia admin and i never get laid. 21:24 +I'd need to put a bit of thought, and get some consensus, as to how best to start working on the article again. I'd be very tempted to revert to the last version I edited, in 2008. Since then User:Amideg (Ami = Anne Marie de Grazia) has taken out a lot of the stuff that attests to notability and put in a lot of useless fancruft. But there might have also been some useful edits in the meantime, so it all needs unpacking. If I'm not simply adding to the article right now, that's why, plus I don't want to spend time on it again if it's for the chop. +i'll give you drama you're a nigger! +Yo admins can u please unblock me plz plz ( wat did i do wrong? +":: Still stuck at work for an hour or so. On the plus side, there has been a betting pool at work to see how long before I got in trouble for some of my own stupidities. I'm out $5. exhales I'll be the first to admit I crossed the line. Firsfron is an admin I can solidly respect for never being full of shit. I feel like blocks are an affair of honor if you fuck up, and you know you did, and you did it anyway, you have to do the time. The statements I made were personal attacks sadly, depressingly, they were also right and there are probably lots of people who feel the same way but who have enough sense not to say so on-wiki. I should apologize to some admins for not sticking them on the excellent and good list. I aught to apologize to some of the admins on the bad list for posting my opinion. I'm bad at apologies. I apologized to Kelly Martin (and damn me, that was hard for me to swallow) because , no matter how I hated what she said, she was right. brightens Still, you're my friend, and I do appreciate what everyone has said here and on that RfC by CoolCat and on ANI. This , however, remains an excellent example of why I don't wanna be an admin. Talk| " +" Biased opinion Hello, Please see who has used the word ""Nonsense"" first in my talk page, it is Mr Sitush who has used and reverted the sourced historical content from Rajus page. I wonder why you dont see the arrogant comments by Sitush on my talk page first. Wiki is for everyone and every author should be respected, it doesnot belong to some x caste or persons. I respect genuine authors, rules should be same for every one, unless and until some one writes scrap. " +Agreed. Stubs have great value when they lead to a reliable source. I have no issues with the tone. +Look sorry if I offended you. I was just joking around. I didn't realize that you would take it so seriously. -wrosew +I hate you? I hate you! +" Barnstar! The Special Barnstar Thank you for commenting on the punitive nature of my block extention. The original block was probably useful in reminding me to guard my tongue. Although disagreeing with my record or methods is irksome personally (for you too probably), you still stood up for what was appropriate in this scenario. Thank you " +Very well. I'm sorry to have bothered you with all of this. Others are looking at the images and will decide if they are okay. Happy editing and good luck with the election. ) +Merge tage with Capability approach I am far from an expert on the subject but a look at the breadth of her published work and teaching career is not reflected in the current article that is heavily weighted to the Capability approach which has a seperate artcile. Either more info on her other interests and career work should be added and the heavy current section on C.A. streamlined into the article about that particular topic. Somebody should also add an infobox.64.231.214.104 +Did anyone even bother to make any decent changes? +Should I create external links and use them as references for the article Psycho-M or what !! +It's unfortunate that the sources are vague on the top few layers of the wall. Anything that we could surmise would probobly be OR. However this doesn't take away from the notabilty of the Montefiore story. Many people read this article to find information about the Montefiore story and if it is indeed unsubstantiated that is what the article should say about it +" ""iPhone"" trademark dispute Interesting that this article is completely devoid of the battle over the iPhone name. Apple, Cisco settle iPhone trademark lawsuit CNET.com (February 21, 2007 6:45 PM PST) Cisco and Apple Agreement on IOS Trademark, Cisco.com (June 7, 2010 at 12:00 pm PST) Cisco lost rights to iPhone trademark last year, experts say ZDNet.com (January 12, 2007 12:35 GMT (04:35 PST)) etc. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to American Express. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" =Red Ensign The caption says ""The Australian Red Ensign, sometimes used as the national flag up until 1953"". I cant work that out. The Australian Flag Society would tell you it was never used on land." +" Avi's claim of ""POV bias"" " +Reply Dear McGeddon I have no connection to the person in question. I am an intern at the South Africa arts and culture council, i have been tasked to factually update the wikipedia pages of prominant South African artists. I am confused why you keep changing my hard work. Nothing i am writing is factually incorrect. I understand that my formulation is not 100% but rather than deleting my hard work could you rather help me make corrections. I would really appreciate it!!! This is not a competition, i am only trying to display to the world information that is correct and flattering to promote South Africa artist. Kind Regards Thandi Moyo +I didn't ask you to declare a consensus, did I? You don't need to care about the issue, but if you decide to determine the level of consensus in a discussion on the issue then you need to care enough to take the time to read it through. And if you don't have time, to let someone else do it. You demonstrated in your statement that you didn't read the discussion carefully. That's what I'm asking you to do. You incorrectly assessed the arguments made, and you incorrectly calculated the number of people giving an opinion. This is the second time I've asked you to defer on this same issue. +" You personally may not have edited the List of collective nouns for birds page, but someone on the IP you are currently using (which is a BT Broadband IP) did at . As the IP you are using is one of the ones that BT Broadband assign to any of their users, someone else using BT Broadband was obviously using it at the time. To prevent future occurences, I would suggest that you create an account, which has a number of benefits, one of which is that your user name is associated with any edits you make, rather than the IP, preventing such confusion! The edit in question is the only edit made using that IP (other than the message you left above) - unless any other contributions were deleted, which would not show on the user contributions for 86.129.151.136 list. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused '''''' (Contact Me, My Contribs) " +For your information, I read the twitter BEFORE reverting edits. WaterlooRoad.co.uk, on its own, is NOT necessarily a factual source. For all you know they could be playing a joke. And if you ARE going to use the twitter as the source, USE IT! The source should be the specific page the information is found. If it's on a twitter page, use the twitter page, NOT the official site of the person of thing the twitter is related to. That being said, waitu until we get proper proof. I.e. if you insist of using WaterlooRoad.co.uk (instead of twitter.com/WaterlooRoadTV), at least wait until THAT states that it's 1st September, OR the official Waterloo Road wesite, BBC Press Office, or any other sources. Don't JUST use twitter, as a source, but use a different site as the written source. +" Image:HILLREYN.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:HILLREYN.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' {chat} " +No vandalism in tge recent edit history of this IP, if you don't mind I want to finish writing what I was writing, and I don't understand what was so offensive about mocking a creationist for using the 'dark matter argument' +Give me 5 reasons why we should not put the 500 million mark in the intro YOU and I both know that many big videogames, movies, etc. give out numbers and what not. Why the hell not put it in GTA 4's paragraph? I mean, it is notable info...Just google 'gta 4 500 million' or gta iv 500 million' and you'll get plenty of results. hell, it talks about it on the most popular news articles on Google right now. +Well spotted. I have made removed it. +"Sometimes they will see ""previous FAC"" (all the older FACs), sometimes they will see your new format, right? " +Image tagging Look mate, what IS your problem with where images come from? They make wikipedia a better place, regardless of source (and for the record I think that ALL of my images qualify as fair use). You're actually working against everything that is good about wikipedia, systematically going after people and questioning everything they do. Who told you to do this? Why take the 'law' into your own hands? Ask yourself this: who are you protecting? You wanna play cops and robbers, go and joing the freaking police. Do something useful, rather than wasting your life on here. What is your job? Cos this ain't real life buddy, and if its your only hobby, I feel bad for you. I mean really bad. I thinks it's quite sad that your only reason for using wikipedia is to actively reverse what other people do, rather than to actively create content. I will review all the images you 'helpfully' tagged for me, but I'm getting real tired of you ducking me man. Peace out. +, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Ok 21:39 +hi you've been rick roll'd +, cos its just retarded what you are assuming. nooblet +George Brecht photo The new George Brecht photo was scanned from an art journal. Is that OK? Otherwise I can remove it. Please advise. +No, it's not, as you surely know. Dealing with history, the Poles refer to the former German cities to modern (or traditional) Polish names. The Russians don't speak of Kaliningrad before 1945. You are too fixated on the Polish-German issue, fearing some 'contagion' as I see. +His argument seems sound to me and the comparison valid. Sincerely, anyone. +Actually being nominated for 18 Grammy Awards is quite an accomplishment. Alot of artist's pages have these charts, or list all wins and nominations. See Gwen Stefani, Justin Timberlake or Kanye West. +" ""the lead section seems a bit long to me"" But this is never an appropriate editorial comment, surely. Editors' personal opinions are never relevant. Is ""to me"" the criterion that Ms Michelle proposes to apply to Wikipedia? " +":As a sub-mariner, I'm sure you are quite aware what ""over and out"" means. However, your request is very polite, and entirely reasonable, so it would seem both very impolite and very unreasonable not to reply, and hence I had intended to respond usefully. But Mr Beestra has taken on the role of divine retribution and dramatically interferred. I hope you won't be offended if I don't reply right now. In very brief summary, I had intended to say something to the effect that your knowledge in the area is thorough and reliable. However, your manner is somewhat abbrasive - in my personally admitted completely biassed opinion: ""It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it."" Any further response would almost certainly lead to me making comments about Mr Beestra's objectivity, so I won't continue. My closing comment would be: Please keep up the good work, but take off your hobnail boots and replace them with soft slippers. Best wishes, " +" Upon going through the edits I don't see anything objectionable, it seems my revert was a mistake. I don't recall why I did it at all, so it might even have been a slip of the hand. I've been monitoring this article for misinformation that sometimes creeps in and could have mistaken the edits upon a quick glance. 🍌 (email) " +Infobox Why shouldn't this article have an infobox? I have been reverted twice now with no reason what so ever. Please, do explain!195.89.48.217 +compared with other ethnic groups +Do you read the comments I make or just make continue to press with your accusations ignoring all comments? +, next time I will consult or using sandbox first before posting an article. +Could you explain how I do that (sorry), the talk page will not let me edit anything, but the edit tab will. +whether you are who you say you are (and what you do) cannot be verified. You could be a fifteen year old girl out of school or a thirty-five year old man, sitting inm his mom's basement I don't know. However, don't play God with material that I have touched. You say it must be a secondary source? It is. You say it must be verified by a second party? I have done so. I HAVE SPOKEN. +Weird, I listened to the conversation with Richard Dansky and he said nothing about the characters in Double Agent. +" Someone keeps erasing this with no comment to me...very unethical. ( minutes after posting this it was erased) check it out. this is very suspicious and unethical by the parties involved. senior management (if in existence) asked to investigate) ````Please do not block me for trying to improve the integrity of the article. Hello, My name is JohnHistory. I was recently blocked for my mentioning of major problems here because I did not assume ""Good Faith"" when confronted with bad faith. I believe that the biggest problem with this article and thus the best way to improve it is to intensely follow the Jimbo guidelines to the T. I am going to post what I wrote on my talk page after being blocked during the controversy here. I could be more covert in my contempt for violations especially given my long but yet humble ranking amongst the Wiki Elite but abusing editors and monitors must be accountable or we will always suffer from their petty tyranny. This surely does not make me popular amongst them, yet I must assume ""good faith"" in them so that they will not prejudice their views against me and comfort their own politics in the process. I was accused of supporting things I never did. All I ask is that criticism be included on par with other presidents. That is all. I don't especially care about Rev Wright, etc but if it is historical record and part of historically long campaign then I will stick my neck out for it. I have to say that the amount of bashing of media and talk that has nothing to do with improving the article is highly tolerated if it is left leaning but anything even center of that is treated with heavy hand and often banished and erased. that is what struck me about the discussion page - mind you I never made an edit on the actual article I was banned for merely talking on a talk page. it was the idea that these so called monitors are in fact just random non scholars at home abusing the tools of wikipedia to further their almost personal agenda in a group- think environment. Thin skin is no excuse for being literally fascistic in your approach to the open to the public - controlled by a small group of ideologues - Wikipedia. These political minding ideologues are 80-100% dominated by left wing or leaning people and controlled through even the excessive use of blocking for discussion posts and factual additions. These (not just mine) are non threatening non- offensive language - just the idea of one stating that their is a problem with the editors and monitors is cause to be blocked and potentially banned for not ""assuming good faith"" or ""positively contributing to the consensus"". what if the consensus is wrong then? What if about if you have already assumed Good Faith long ago and are simply diagnosing the major illness of the article as you see it? The evidence is more then abundant that these monitors are violating their tools and are involved in subterfuge or at least strong bias as evidenced between comparing Obama with W Bush. Additionally, the Obama Administration through proxies, in my strong opinion, is at work in the Obama article. I say this mainly because it is inconceivable to me that given the current administrations use and celebration of all things internet and aggressive pursuit of media outlets and shaping the publics opinion (as is understandable) that someone out of the thousands of Obama connected likely people is not involved on the Barack Obama page. It is the most visited page on Wikipedia and is one of the top hits for people searching the internet for the name Barack Obama. However, that is secondary to the already abundant supply of ideologue editors and monitors who seem to fill the demographic of the wikipedia junior officer ranks who enough of is all that it really takes. The number of those is in the millions. That is Why Jimbo guidelines must be followed as an example of the integrity of wikipedia as a REAL encyclopedia that could stand out in a scholarly work. The language given the Rulers of Wikipedia gives them broad ability to block and ban anyone they disagree with. OFten the language is contradictory. For instance I was blocked for my comments on the TALK page and cited for ""Making a point instead of wanting to edit"". How, exactly, do you make a TALK page based discussion about edits without making a point? Another monitor told me I had to assume good faith, yet no good faith was given to me in my quest to improve article. In addition, the ""TALK"" page says no writing will be allowed that involves ""general discussion"" however that can be loosely interpreted and it could for instance only be 5% of what you wrote and then be grounds by a prejudiced monitor to remove your entire sections containing many posts. Additionally, the last guideline about general talk is only applied to people making comments critical or potentially scandalous to the President of the United stat +May not be a insult but still name calling Kepp it up and you will be blocked. +Your recent edits (List of active Indian military aircraft) +" I seriously doubt it. The combats took place over Allied held territory, so if there were more German losses, the Allies would have known about it. Russell Brown points to cases of Allied overclaiming in North Africa as well. I see this may become another ""the dastardly Germans were the only ones that didn't play by the rules. So I'll leave it there. " +It would also be advisable for other people to refrain from undoing my edits as well. This is my article and is about me after all. +No it does not. It is begging their case as being better. It is clearly making a case for why it is better. I think my edit does a better job. Please look at it. I think it is a little more objective. The goals in Net do not have to be described at the credibility of the other organization. ( ) +2007 (UTC) They weren't lost. 15:38, 22 May +And if I get fair use? +Invitation to join new discussions on Ave Maria University talk page Hi! In light of a flurry of recent edits to Ave Maria University, I've opened a couple of new discussions at Talk:Ave Maria University. We should probably work to achieve consensus there. I'll be inviting all the named users who have been editing at AMU. Thanks in advance for your input! +Dchall, what is your problem. You want to say more Romas died than Serbs? LoL! I wanted to say that after albanians mostly Serbs died you removed it, even if it's a fact. I gave back number more than 3,200 only by KLA forces and please don't remove it. +this is random, but the most significant thing I remember from flying with midwest is that thes serve fresh baked chocolate chips cookies on every flight. Is that written somewhere? If yes, I think it would be a fun trivia thingey. +3PO I put another response on John Bowlby if you had a mo. Or half a mo come to that. barley +well said, agreed. +Temperance and Threats. Hi. I think Xiong could not possibly be more wrong in some of the things he has said on the Village Pump page. Nonetheless, this comment that you made is, in my opinion, inappropriate. Your admin tools are a mop, to be used to clean up Wikipedia for the good of the community, not a club to be brandished in the direction of people with whom you disagree. I think you should revert that comment. Regards, +Fascism Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - +" Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the ""reviewer"" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. ™ " +Fleming H. Revell Co. The Baker Publishing Group web site provides is enough information to create a stub about Fleming H. Revell or about the company which became a career. There's a question in my mind about whether this company is sufficiently prominent; however, the number of digitized books to be acceessed via Google Book Search may render any reservations moot ...? Griffis, William Elliot. (1900). Verbeck of Japan: A Citizen of No Country; a Life Story of Foundation Work Inaugurated by Guido Fridolin Verbeck.. Chicago: Fleming H. Revell Co. [reprinted by Oliphant, Anderson and Ferrier, London, 1901. .... Click for digitized, full-text copy of this book ] At this point, I just don't know whether or not to take this any further. +Höganäs AB Please don't move pages by copying and pasting content, like you did with Höganäs AB. Use the move tag or request a page move at WP:RM. Thanks. ~ +Prithviraj III grave?! Where is it?! take a photo of it! +GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Flore et Zéphire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Most of this passes, but there is one concern that needs to be addressed. Will be contacting nominator directly, as the concern would require some information to be given directly and I do not want clutter this page with such concerns. +" Exactly. I just don't think that, however harrowing her experience, it is possible without being almost painfully ""present-ist"" in our view of the world to say the merits a rating of ""High Importance"" in such categories as women's history. " +Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex Please have a look at and join the above! +" Well it seems that even providing a reference, some cunt has ""blocked me from editing"". It gives further evidence to the dishonesty, unintelligence, and desire to suppress information which I expounded on ""Jimbo's"" page. Here is the reference for ""pussy pelmet"" I gave. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/under-the-counter-with-lindsay-calder-1251446.html The block was for ""disruptive editing"", clearly this is a lie, or if an honest mistake, it is made by someone of extremely low intelligence. If you can give an alternative believable explanation I'd like to here it." +October 2008 Regarding edits made during October 21 2008 (UTC) Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +Schumin and DC Hi, I don't think Ben can go along to the DC meetup. The last one he was at he was too fat to sit on the chair so everyone had to go outside and sit on concrete blocks instead. He also had that irritating video camera with him and sneakily took video footage of the male crotch region - that seems to be his thing, the poor sod. Generally speaking the guy is a creep who thinks its cool to take video footage of everything - I reccomend you keep well away from him. +Image:Tierradentro.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tierradentro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +The last two comments were actually directed at the ones who invited admins to take over for them. +Listen Bubba73, all i try to do is improving the moon landing hoax article! but how come that one mans opinion (yes, Jay Windleys opinions at hiw own clavius site) can be accepted as a source? if it was vice versa it would never been accepted as a source, and how come that all my posts in the TALK session got deleted(censored) even the fact they contained video evidence where Windley and Plait got caught misleading us! this isnt accetable! people has right to know which kinda sources they read and who's behind them +Not sure, however my guess is he won't, since he is the Sovereign Prince of Monaco. The Monaco government & people may not want their monarch risking his life. +Since you fail to recognize facts, I am forced to tell you the facts. Here the section break is above Lobojo's post dated . Then here you inserted the same section break but this time above Law Lord's post dated . In other words, you did not restore anything but rather inserted a new break in the middle of everything. If your only contribution is inserting empty section breaks like here, you should not contribute at all. +" Alright, , look at the page now. I've added a new header under ""Supreme Court nominees"" which lists his votes. How do you feel about it? " +" Religion Some contributors refer to the Rastafarian ""religion"". All dictionaries define religion as ""a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices"", or similar. Religions write down their curriculum and document everything in detail. Relgions can be propagated and repeated indefinitely. They are a managed and organized teaching system. The Rastafarian ""religion"" doesn't meet this test. In the truest dictionary sense, Rastafarianism is not a ""religion"". It is a folk cult (i.e. A ""faddish devotion to or veneration for a person, principle, or thing""), and varies from person to person, and village to village. Definitions are from dictionary.com " +Since when do we all love the music industry? One or two good choices there though. +F**K YOUR GUTS lol ) +Oh dear. I thought Rex had finally gone, but no... +BMI produced a neutral(well, only slight pro bush) sentence that no one complained about, and it was quietly removed. If we can't have neutral(probush minimized) we will have a correct version. +The data in the SAA and .38LC articles are very specific, there's no room for misinterpretation. One statement is false and since the one in this article is the least detailed I suspect it to be the false one. 84.163.235.6 +Redirection is a terrible idea. Moving Forward is a movie. A movie on Netflix and other outlets giving it total independence from TZM or anything else. This is a move being conducted by anti-tzm folk who iwsh to downplay TZM's true work, which is ubiquitous in hundreds of hours of online media, lectures and in their Book +" RE:Hidden Pages Hi, Im keen on keeping these because I think that the next in line will be the signature pages. But I have given up, Ill post a comment on all of the pages with the exeption of MC. I realized that you all win and I dont hold a grudge so ill just forget about it. (with the exeption of MC s/he deserves to keep his/her due to the edits s/he has. Expert " +" Democratic laicism? ""The political system of Kurdistan regional government is democratic laicism."" What the heck is ""democratic laicism""? This term only gets two hits on google, and one of those pages is for this article. I don't know enough about Iraqi Kurdistan to make a correction, here, but surely a term that's in more general use should be used to describe the Kurdish political system. " +" I do not see how Guru Nanak ""founded"" Sikhism Nanak is the first of the ten Sikh gurus, but that does not mean that he founded it. As the word is usually understood, founding a religion means separating it from the other ones, and Nanak definitely never separated his followers from Muslims or Hindus. In fact, many of Nanak's practices were things that were eventually forbidden once Sikhism was founded - for example, fasting and going on pilgrimages. I believe that it was the last Guru who separated Sikhism from Islam and Hinduism. " +WTFever Both the Wendy Davis page and the Mission America page represent everything wrong with the site. On one although the woman was embroiled in front page personal scandals there is hardly a mention and that would be a vague one buried at that. Mission America is a clear hit piece. The Right Wing Watches were not considered NPOV until the site succumbed to paid shills. Posting Mission America's response to arbitrarily being labeled a hate group is exactly what would have and did take place numerous times until again, the full time paid shill who has edited out same material from a half dozen different editors over numerous years magically appears to edit it out again. That page's purpose is to do nothing other than foment hate. Really, block away. +" deletion sorting Personally I find Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam incredibly useful. Votestalking can take place in any manner. If there is not a centralized place, those who want certain articles deleted will still communicate with each other. But I won't be ""in the know."" With this system, which User:Itaqallah is so fond of using, I am able to watchlist this single page and learn what's going on the same way that others do. I suggest that we make the deletion sorting page better known instead of deleting it, you know, tell your friends. —  talk — " +Which is why I suggested it be rewritten. +This is a disgrace to Wikipedia. +noart.uh https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion;=1&espv;=2&ie;=UTF-8#q=amiel%20tison tsktsk +, they are not magically made wonderful theories by a vintage Pulitzer prize endorsing them, +" {| style=""width: 100%; background-color: #FFFFF0; border: 2px solid #F4A460; padding: 10px; margin-top: -1px; margin-bottom: 8px; vertical-align: top;"" | colspan=3 style=""vertical-align:top"" | " +" Decision No contest, will merge. In addition, I will move this page to Bell 427/429, but will not oppose if it is moved back to ""Bell 427"" (or ""Bell 429 either, just not both). - " +You yourself are the biggest vandalist you must leave administrator work. you do not have knowledge of editing .wiki is group of .... people. you have stolen the image of my dog and put it on your page. you are doing voilation of copyright image . I will sue you you are playing with law of countries by putting it in your own words .you are worst then dog. .......astered..come what me .let us see how you can harm me .. priyadarshivishal23 +" ... cont Hmm.. Thought you were one of them old white power women who are offended by the word ""Cracker."" Wake up sister, we're here to stay, we're here to revolutionize the English language." +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Stan Polley. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Contact me,Contribs) " +" It sounds like that it was Brain just calling them that, and in that case it could have been a derogatory remark since I do believe some Native Americans consider ""redskin"" a racist slur. I know they were fighting to change the Washington Redskins name a few years ago. But in any case it doesn't mean that it was the gang's name does it? " +Is this all I need to do to create a talk page ??? +"Age of consent 17-18== I wanted about six months ago to add info that many states, at least 19 if I'm remembering correctly, have an age of consent of 17 or 18 but Flyer22 would not let me include the info next to the age range, only as a footnote. I think the information is important because simply stating the age range is 12-15 gives a misleading impression that all 50 states allow children 16 and older to consent to sex with adults, which is not true. Is it at all possible that the statement that not all states have an age of consent of 16 can be included next to the age range. I'm not edit warring I'm taking it to the talk page to see if I can get consensus. This matter was already settled after extensive debate. Refer to #Age of consent above. It wasn't about me not letting you do anything. It was about WP:Consensus being against you, and for valid reasons. I'm not about to repeat much of what was stated by me and various other editors on this matter. Furthermore, the lead is currently very clear that it's only the age range on the show that is designated as 12-15. I compromised more than enough with you on this. The current wording isn't even the agreed-upon consensus wording, but it is wording that I compromised with you on upon your return to Wikipedia. And once again, the lead of this article is not for mentioning age of consent laws, and your concern is no longer valid since the lead explicitly states ""on the program, the range is usually ages 12–15."" It would only take one sentence to clarify that issue, its not like it would take a paragraph. And Malke's whole point against me was that the edit gave a false impression that the age of consent in the USA is 16. So I think its worth having one sentence clarifying that. Also I disagree that the lead should not mention laws, because the only reason the show exists is because these men are breaking the law. The issue is already clarified. And, like I stated, I am not repeating to you what was made explicitly clear to you by me and several other editors last year. Oh, and WP:LEAD is clear about what the lead should mention. Off-topic material is not a requirement or advised. And age of consent laws in the lead is off-topic. And changing the lead back to the contested, consensus-violation wording, which I again reverted, after you've repeated your contested view on this talk page, is something that you should never do. You should wait until the discussion is over. And if you see that the discussion is over, and you still haven't gotten your way, then too bad. We go by consensus when there's been a dispute that couldn't be settled between two or more editors, and consensus is clear on this. Do you think I'm suddenly going to agree with you? That is not going to happen, and, as stated, I've compromised with you enough on this. Your recent restoration of that contested edit is exactly what I was complaining to you about when I mentioned how you revert and revert, hoping to tire out the opposing editor and/or have the opposing editor finally agree with you. If I were to ask the Wikipedia community to weigh in on this again, the outcome would be the same. No doubt. So you need to move on from this discussion. See WP:DEADHORSE. I restored the note in a better way, ""age of consent varies by state"", because it does. And this way it doesn't look like its editorializing, unlike the previous ""it should be noted in some states it is 17"". The age of consent in Virginia is fifteen, for example, at least according to Hansen's book. Yes, you added the note in a way that still violates WP:CONSENSUS on the issue. Thank goodness Zadignose stepped in and reverted. I've just stepped into this conversation, at by the look of it there's been some edit warring over what looks like a non-issue. The text: ""It was devoted to impersonating underage youth ranging from 11 to 15 years in age, and detaining adults who contacted them over the Internet for sexual liaisons."" is entirely unambiguous, and requires no qualification or elaboration. It doesn't need any explanation of the various state laws regarding age of consent, as it doesn't even mention such laws, which seems entirely appropriate to the articl +You really need to tone down the wording about the company's products and spend more time on its history (not just copying a timeline), getting some neutral third party sources, and writing it to discuss it in a more neutral tone. +Own article Dewey has done some independent work and there is info unrelated to America here, but it is difficult to add/edit that info if someone keeps removing the article. I disagree completely with the assertion by a single editor that everything currently here is covered in the America article. It appears that consensus is for a separate article since only a single editor is objecting. +" GA? I actually think this could be nominated as a Good Article candidate. Some questions: Where did she study to become an orthopedic surgeon? What does ""mentor"" mean in this context? Doctoral advisor? I don't know if ""she had gotten into the water"" is proper wording. ""tearing up"" a proper wording for crying? " +What behavior? I protested a number of AfDs concerned with academics. The nominator offered nothing but their personal opinion and is aggressively AfDing a lot of academics, then comes to AN/I and says I am hounding him/her without any diffs or proof, but everything anyone said against me is taken 100%? And with that you advise me to, well, to drop what? I AM not hounding anyone at the bot related pages. Betacommand is STALKING ME there. So, you're saying, as long as I let everyone who disagrees with me do what they want that, that what? I can't even follow this? I can just make accusations against another user and provide no proof and the accusations will be believed? Even a user with as tarnished a history as Betacommand can make an unsupported accusation against me and you'll believe it? Why would I take your advice? The block removal was pointless because the IP is blocked, you know. If you're going to accuse me of things, why not provide proof, support your accusations, demand that others support your accusations, then give me 1/2 a chance to defend myself against the accusations instead of just assuming because I'm new that anything anyone says against me is 100% accurate and nothing I can say even if the accusations were presented would matter? +Hi - That's great news about Slessor - GA and DYN! Thanks for the update. +Broken redirects Your redirects from Gesca, Gesca Ltée, Gesca Ltd. and [[Gesca Limited to Gesca Limitée are showing up on the Special:BrokenRedirects report. Are you planning to write an article? (pigs can fly) 4 July 2005 12:57 (UTC) +" Illegal Haitians Illegal Haitian immigrants are NOT counted in the country's statistics. DR has a huge Haitian population, over half of which are illegal. This is fact, look it up. So, counting the native black population and Haitians (both naturalized and illegal) together, statistically DR would be somewhat ""blacker"" than just 18%." +Note Note that 74.33.98.63 is used by Keith Pickering in America. +and while he apparently wasn't there for 2 days +I told you I haven't edited any comment. Some comments in past have been edited by you. I can see that. And let other edit Kushwaha article so that it doesn't give false look it is having now. I hope this is this ok. +Too many people belive that crap. +John Lehr and copyright John Lehr (photographer), which you created, is much the same as this page at walkerart.org. A different page at walkerart.org tells us that All text documents [...] published by the Walker Art Center on the Walker Web site (http://www.walkerart.org) [...] are protected by copyright and may not be reproduced [...] without the Walker Art Center's written permission. Clearly this is not GFDL so somebody's copyright has been violated. My guess is that WP has violated their copyright rather than vice versa, so I've deleted the article here. +It doesn't end anything. That could be completely photoshopped. Page goes by proof and consensus. Consensus has been it stays sans Crane. You are the only one still insisting it be moved. Even the move page has it noted as contested. +Up Pompeii! Up Pompeii! would seem to be directly inspired by a Funny Thing, but is there evidence for this suspicion? +Good work, but maybe a question? Hi Shrigley just a quick note to say that I have admired your work, but I think you got it wrong with your latest edit at Qing dynasty#Name. I explained my thoughts on the Talk Page. All the best +I'm not a regular editor of the article, but I don't think that this is notable enough for the lede. Most people know about WT7 because it was destroyed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, not because it was the only building that collapsed because of a fire damage. +" Conservapedia is liberal If Conservapedia is conservative, why does it not allow the use of the word ""fag""? While I admit Wikipedia is liberal, Conservapedia is ten times as liberal. Any truly consevrative website would encourage homophobia and the use of homophobic slurs, so the site is very liberal. " +This may be information you already have: he pronounced his name just like it looks, like the gem. My hand-held doesn't have the characters to produce WP's pronunciation system, but if it's not addressed soon, I'll stick something in, and maybe someone will make it consistent.72.53.194.237 +" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! hablame aqui Edit Summary Request I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add ""and misc."" to cover the other change(s). Thanks! hablame aqui " +What exactly is the problem? The statement was accurate in it's entirety, and the people contacted were a small part of those affected. Why do you think this is inappropriate? +" you mean there is no consensus to keep it as is, it currently contravenes our guidelines. talk. " +Too hard to read, too long and it doesn't explain the change you want done. +Block log info: Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by '''''' for the following reason (see our blocking policy): persistant personal attacks and constant harassment of another editor Your IP address is 85.84.232.213. +(proto-)Slovak state and (proto-)Slovakian men Hi Rembaoud! I tried to remove this satement on an another place but I was not successful in it: I may ask what is your opinion about this sentence? another article: Slavomir as Great-Moravian (Slovakian) man was written by Tankred.Nitra Principality was written by Tankred of course. (talk • contribs) +A personal entry, moved here +If I understand the issue correct, J Millburn's point is that usage of non-free images is allowed in some exceptional cases regardless of whether such a permission is granted or not. Even after obtaining a permission this image will remain non-free, so NFCC will still applicable to its usage. +I asked him lol168.103.152.212 +I can understand where you're coming from as I've been there myself more or less. Good luck getting the article to GA, and I'm also sorry if my comments came across as rude. Take care -)! +" WP:FAIRUSE is just an alias for Wikipedia:Non-free content so we are in agreement on the relevant policy. As for how to edit the quote, perhaps somethin like the following: ""I was with her when she died. She left this world literally screaming at the top of her lungs. I was with her constantly, ... She was home for the last few weeks when the doctor told us there was nothing they could do anymore. Up until the last two days, she was still moving around. The doctor told us she will leave very quickly and her body will just start to shutdown. But when she left, she left the world with a bang, she left it how she lived it. She screamed her way out of here, literally. I truly believe her survival instincts were so part of her DNA that she was not going to go quietly or willingly. It was just the two of us hanging out [during the last days] she was very funny. We didn’t have to [talk] because I always knew how she felt about me, I was the love of her life, so the last part of her life we didn’t have to have these heart to heart talks."" or even ""I was with her when she died. She left this world literally screaming at the top of her lungs. I was with her constantly, ... She was home for the last few weeks when the doctor told us there was nothing they could do anymore. Up until the last two days, she was still moving around. The doctor told us she will leave very quickly and her body will just start to shutdown. But when she left, she left the world with a bang, she left it how she lived it. She screamed her way out of here, literally."" But if the consensus of editors at this page is to use the full quote as it now stands, I don't think that would be horrid or forbidded. I would say this is about as long as a direct quote should usually be, in my view. But each circumstance is different. (talk) " +I bet Onceinawhile is an Arab. +" Abuse of your administrative tools Why are you deliberately abusing your administrator powers by censoring information that disputes libel about Jews and making up lies that is ""Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material""?" +It would also be interesting to know for what we have been banned. +sorry my bad, i really didnt see it, thought it was completely removed and so reverted it. +75.84.95.229 again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deep_Space_Industries&diff;=prev&oldid;=534766853 +" It's an important aspect of the game; Gnangarra is right, the GA nomination would not succeed with the current status of certain sections in the article. 64 " +I've done what I think fair,; I gave the explanations earlier. Perhaps they wil stick. '''''' ( talk ) +" Ok, an seems pretty clear by now what editor is responsible here. Amalthea " +The letter does not state no criminal background was found. +Hey, I got a master degree in ass wiping, were practically kin. +First of all, please indicate on your user page that you are an admin. Next, I am standing for justice. I promise that you have not had even reviewed the case closely yourself. Please block for a week if it is not so. +"talk)]] Zoe, thank you for the kindness of your reply. I can't help wondering if your answer is to the point, however, since my question was about the use of in articles and the reference you cite is about the talk pages. Moreover, it seems not to discuss comments. DreamGuy cites the use of comments in Wica (see his edit summary). I might add Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans. These examples suggest to me that some use of comments may be appropriate in articles. The Katrina article was edited frequently by many distinct editors. I don't think comments would have been retained without support for their use. I wonder if you might be willing to reply to my query regarding the comment wording (and caps use) that I proposed in my previous message? May I say that I don't agree with the reversion by DreamGuy of your deletion of my comments? My preference is to resolve this matter through discussion and dialogue. Best wishes, (talk) (... two editors want them here, one does not, so far that means the two editors win.... these guidelines are useful and used elsewhere, so no reason to remove them) copied from editorial summary DreamGuy (Talk) As a gesture of good faith, I'm going to put the wording I proposed above into the article in place of my original wording. I think my original might be considered shouting because of use of caps. Zoe and DreamGuy, please show restraint and don't revert my wording for now. Once we've agreed on a final version, one of us can edit the article to suit. Zoe, is there an editor whose judgement you trust that might be willing to take a look at this dispute and comment? Thank you both, (talk) In fiction and In music consensus The consensus (painfully) reached here is that the In fiction and In music sections should contain short representative lists of the most notable instances of chimera in fiction and music (see the article edit history and the arbitration on the article discussion page). These sections should not include every instance since the lists would become so long as to have little or no value and would give the impression that such uses are more important than mythical or scientific uses. Wikipedea is not mere collections of internal links. See what not to put on disambiguation pages, as well. Consequently, before adding to this section, please take the following steps: be sure that the article that you are linking mentions chimera. We should not be sending readers that are looking for information about chimera to articles that do not mention the term. verify that your addition is at least as notable as the examples already listed and that chimera plays a major, not just a tangential role in the work. consider replacing an existing less-notable entry. justify your edit on this page. Finally, if you disagree with my opinion of the consensus, leave your comments here. Please don't edit the article to make your point. (talk) Page move request To move the page to its classical Latin spelling Chimaera. It is of course a classical creature / concept, which has nothing to do with the US, so why should it be at a recent US variant spelling? - I think this is a reasonable argument. On the other hand, the majority modern usage is with the Chimera spelling, I think. Google finds 3,230,000 (Chimera) v. 1,010,000 (Chimaera). If Google is an indication of use frequency among Internet users, a majority of readers will be searching for Chimera. That is a weak argument; redirects are relatively cheap, or so I think. (talk) Gee, why should it use a recent US spelling? Well, there's Wikipedia:Use English policy, Wikipedia:Naming conventions policy that say we use the most common version, and a conspicuous lack of any policy that says Wikipedia:Use archaic Latin. We spell it the way it's spelled in the real world, it's a little thing called Wikipedia:Use common sense. NEWLIN +test test 159.242.66.76 +Undoing the quality editing I made to the article serves no purpose but to make Wikipedia worse. Think about what you're doing first. 72.66.80.133 +That solves the problem you think is involved but does solve the problem actually involved. The problem is that the goal of the Wikimedia Foundation (and its long time supporters) is free educational resources with free not just meaning no cost but also encompassing all the freedoms free people should have with regard to information of all kinds - including the freedom to alter it and distribute it. Freedom is not something to sell out for the sake of a pretty web page. On the other hand, a no cost distribution of educational images that unfortunately are not totally free is a useful compromise at times. This is the issue and the debate. +Responding: As I review, and continue to be pointed to deletion procedures, you regularly violate those procedures. Many articles you routinely delete do not look like spam, vandalism or anything in the definition of a candidate even for Speedy Deletion. But you habitually step beyond Speedy Deletion (where discussion can happen), put your unilateral opinion above all, and delete the articles. By all policies I see on WP, that habit must be stopped. Most editors nicely roll over and accept your abuse of policy. +Justice is the same for all I want to thank you for your understanding and your support. That makes me believe again in WP. I will not you forget that, be sure ). If I can help you with anything, let me know. Best wishes Brian. +Doctor Edna Is watching you. +" Well I suppose in the sense he sat out 2006 makes him a rookie in their eyes. But again, we're going by the year they exited college football, as oppose to their first year in the NFL.►''''''Holla! " +Alright, done. I have to remember to not bite the newbies. +Hi and thanks for your note. Per WP:CRYSTAL we probably should move those out. Ambassadors already has a good note about its delay but The Daemons makes no mention of any month/year of its release in the twitter feed being sourced. It just seems to me that we are sticklers about sourcing for any new info going into the articles for the upcoming season why then don't we apply that to the DVD releases. I think I will tranfer this discussion to the page for that article and if a consensus feels that it is okay then it should most certainly be put back in. My apology over any conflicts over this and thanks again for you note. | Talk +Good to know. I visited your talk page wanting to comment, but without looking around extensively at what you've been doing, so please excuse any sense that I'm commenting to the choir, as it were... +Casualties Some of the numbers dont add up (and theres probably double counting too). Many additions were made without sources. 58 wasnt surced, 50 was removed confusing changes 43 unsourced 35 nd 90 unsourced33 unsourced12 unsourced( ). +Don't vandalize articles +This discussion is two years old, but I believe a record should be made of my intentions. There are FAs like USS Wisconsin (BB-64) and USS Missouri (BB-63) that are this long. It's well-written. I believe the article could be cleaned up at its current length or something close to it, and achieve FA status. Breaking up those huge sections into sub-sections would be a good starting point. +I'll just wait. I've already got a list of edits that will only help to make multiple soap pages much, much better. Thank you for your time, . +Okay, I'm sorry I reacted so hastely toward you my freind, please consider that I'm a fat pig that sits at home and jacksoff with a picture of Judge Judy, and i weight 300 lbs. Sorry Mister. +hfalhsd Yeah, the info I put in were 100% true and accurate. Maybe you were rubbin dongs with him or something. +Taylor Swift Album Todelete the names ESHERANN and GarLighbo from Wikipedia the can not have guest appearance they must be Hall Of Fame singers to delete all the names no guest appearance was a mistake with ESHERRAAANNN and read all the messages READ and do never give your own kidding interviews you kidding joke Taylor Swift understand READ THE MESSAGES all READ ! To delete all about TiMc and debut too and all and to delete all and submitting comments FaceBook and Twitter too with your name nothing to do gave you the chance to be the wife you have to do that girls got the chance like you can not have that all impossible against the LAW and JUSTICE and Supreme Justice Court USA understand and international justice of human rights you worked and working against th rights you all and your family to delete all understand and STAY AT HOME ! There is no American Music Awards you kidding joke ! Stay at home ! understand !!!!!! You are the first working against the messages you are sick and disturbed i ruin your life and your future and you the rest of the life you got it all what was that ? Victoria Secret event ? What does it mean ? STAY AT HOME ? !!!!! STAY AT HOME !!!!!!!!! Do you understand me you bitch and you bitch Andrea Swift what did i tell you and Scott Swift and you all STAY AT HOME she is sick Taylor Swift Stay at home ! INTERVIEWS ! in front of the cameras Taylor Swift and Family Swift you got it all interviews and to delete all the names from the sites and movies and videos and pictures and all to delete all understand me all and new clean Wiki all new and all to delete and the interviews ! NOW has the meaning now ! NOW ! you got it two weeks ago interviews about the KIDS and MathGrGR and all and all the names to talk about and all are jokes and my FANS and read all the messages READ all the messages Read all the messages Read READ READ READ READ READ READ READ all the messsages you are sick and disturbed the whole family and Scott Borchetta i fuck you in pschiatry you are fired and going in psychiatey read that all i fuck you you bitch that is promiss who told you VIctoria Sicret what was your possition UNiversal you are leaving RESTAURANT now leaving i fuck you bitch understand ! Listen bitch i am crazy you are working around the clock against the messages you bitch who told you to go to Victoria Secret.... Faschion what does it mean you bitch November 7 you got it all to stay at home too what do you doing on the event you bitch game is over and when i am telling you to stay at home you bitch that has the meaning to stay at home do you understand me you bitch who told you to go on Victoria Secret who told you that you bitch and you bitch Scott Swift and Andrea Swift who told you that ? what does it mean you family Swift and you all there is Scott Borchetta there go away you are fired in the Media you have no licence more and you have to leave Machine now you got it i put you all in psychiatry the rest of the life do you understand me you all and you Taylor Swift i put you the rest of the life in psychiatry what does it mean you bitch Victoria Secret ? event to stay at home has the meaning to stay at home YOUR parents and you are leaving now the media and going to a ranch forever i fuck you the rest of the life you bitch what does it mean to work against the messsages you bitch TO STAY AT HOME HAS THE MEANING TO STAY AT HOME do you understand me you bitch THE ACTORS got it i kicked your ass forever i fuck you bitch what does it mean to work against the messages what does it mean you bitches and you bitch Taylor Swift and in front of the cameras to stay and talk about all messages you got it in front of the cameras you bitch can you not read you bitch can you not understand americanish can you not read and interviews too was a mistake to take somebody from a casting show to the productions that is not allowed LAW to cut all and release the RED album and the interviews EDSHEERAAN is disgusting he is a casting act and he can not be on the producttions who´s idea was that looks like yours you bitch and your games read all the messages again and STAY AT HOME has the meaning STAY AT HOME you bitch do you understand me you bitch all to release and what does it mea Victoria Sectret event can you not read you bitch STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME i fuck you bitch interview and you all dropped me in the situation i am waiting for somebody with ID to go you bitches and you bitch and your games what does it mean Victoria Secret event and a model diss you answer the model she is a joke she is a only catwalk model a joke and not my level to diss me understand you bitch interviews and what does it mean when i am telling you STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME STAY AT HOME and what do you doing event British Got Talent and X-Factor what is that ? what kind of shit is that ? what do you doing ? and the concert what +Who are you? Are you wekepedia employee? or just user? Why you did tag on many article to delete. I think you are very stupid so you do not have qualification to delete apply. Are All Wekepedia admisttraot like you...I really dissapoined wekepdiea becaouse of you. +Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +" There's that ""shake"" sense of humor we all know and love. 3:16 " +" Double-quote redirects Can you please explain why you redirected something in double single quotes? I just don't see any possible value in that and was wondering if you could explain. " +" You present a fundamental misunderstanding of anarchism. Anarchists do not reject the opinion of learned people; they reject their being promoted to positions of authority. ""Sensible"" would be what a web accessibility standard prescribes. Not sensible would be for the aesthetic sensibilities of people who are not experts to predominate. " +":::Congratulations on becoming another fine crat, someone who I can't wait to see closing RFA's! Sorry for the late congrats... I must have been eating a wifecake! // talk // ark // " +Good question. Anytime I see something like that I wonder too. I did a Google search and found this article, dated 2001, which uses the term. . So if it's a neologism, at least we're not responsible for making it up. Seeing as it is a redlink, we might go put in a request for an article. In fact, I just did so here: Wikipedia:Requested articles/Natural Sciences +" Of course Mr Shankbone did revert edits, significantly more than 4 times in 24 hours too! The biggest difference is that each time I was trying to find something that would survive, but he went directly back to the same thing. And while it is true that everyone thinks their version is correct... you will notice that I do not have a history of being concerned about that. You will also notice that in fact the false statement that I removed conflicts with a sourced statement earlier in the article, and conflicts with the reference provided for the last sentence for that item. Wikipedia has a richly deserved reputation as a source of inaccurate information because of exactly that type of entry! The statement was that it is dark in Barrow for ""a month or so"" in winter. In fact it is more that twice that long (67 days), and that is an easy to verify fact See the references provided in the article. You can also check the edit history and find that at one time the article itself was not quite correct, and that I provided the correct facts and the reference. I would also suggest that you read the discussion page for that article, as back in October others wanted it deleted, and I am the one who suggested waiting for awhile. But I did then say that it eventually should be removed for the reasons the other person complained about. Whatever, tomorrow is another day. If you have no integrity and want to bully your way to victory, so be it. I'm not going to stoop to quite that level. But trust me that in the long run I think that article will be corrected. " +Yeah, big congrats. +" Could you please make this clear with the usual block template? | 39 " +" Proposal: Move to ""LGBT community"" (Part 2) Requested move Gay community → LGBT community — I think the name of this article should be ""LGBT community"" instead of ""gay community"". The word gay is an ambiguous and often pejorative term and it doesn't cover anything beside male and female homosexuals. Are bisexuals and trans people gay? According to this name, they are. We already have LGBT portal, LGBT-related lists, LGBT culture, LGBT people, LGTB history and even LGBT stubs. Do I see somewhere Gay portal, Gay-related lists, Gay culture, Gay people, Gay history and Gay stubs? I hereby propose that the article should be renamed to ""LGBT community"" in order to standardize Wikipedia's coverage on LGBT topics. Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. Discussion Any additional comments:" +" Adam told me that he ""doesn't want"" to engage in a wheel war with you. It's you that cause TJive to portray me as a ""web spy"", and I'v been receiving harassing emails gloating over my ""ban"". " +" Comment: Yes, I'm asserting that the novel is the inspiration for anything else (derivative works) listed on the dab page, as clearly stated on all pages involved. Therefore the novel should be the primary topic. Ref: WP:NC(F)#From other topics, the example regarding An American in Paris. Dracula would be another related example. ₪— (T·C) "" " +"==Somewhere== I have added a ""{{prod}}"" template to the article Somewhere, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. " +I repeat, Hadith are regarded by traditional Islamic schools of jurisprudence as important tools for understanding the Quran and in matters of jurisprudence(Ibn Hajar, Ahmad. al-Nukat ala Kitab ibn al-Salah, vol. 1, pg. 90. Maktabah al-Furqan). They are reliable secondary sources (they are not primary sources). +Why do you attribute those edits to me? +"::::I am glad to be discussing the subject with an editor having experience in forest ecology. The name of the article, ""Close to nature forestry"", comes from a continental school, but the content incorporates the US theory and practice I found reading the work of professor Tom Mc Evoy, ""Positive Impact Forestry"", and I also made reference to the ""Ecoforestry Institute"". I thought that the title ""Close to nature forestry"" reflected better the concept than ""positive impact forestry"". Also I may be biased, because of being a continental, but looking closer, as I am Spanish, and the current is of German origin, I may have certain neutrality. The article does not claim novelty, since the German movement was initiated in 1950. I think that the main value is to consider that the human action in forest should only be to help nature do more quickly the process it would make slowly by itself; and as a result the idea that to manage a forest as an ecosystem has sense also from the economical point of view, as it reduces operating costs. Needless to say that the article is open to incorporate any additional information, particularly concerning US practice and experience, and help balance it. " +nick jonas we rock is also featured on joe jonas discography. on the soundtrack the are creditet as cast of camp rock. not as jonas brothers +You in no way justified your deletion of my edits on the Byzantine Literature page, you simply removed the pictures as they either a) offended your atheist sensibilities or b) as some childish way of offending me. This will be reported. +" You mean WP:RFD? I'm not active there, I can't remember the last time I closed one. I'm also not aware of a precedent of the sort you describe, although generally doing stupid things for a long time tends to result in exclusion from the project in some way sooner or later. See WP:IDHT. " +Did you even read? Did you even read the talk page of Suffokate before deleting? D +WIKIPEDIA WITHOUT ZOE!!! Thank God, halleluja, clap your hands, and everything else! All that I can say is this: don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you! It was high time that she left, and may all the other vandals with official titles, attacking new users and deleting articles on a whim, go with her. This Encyclopedia is just a little bit more free. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.174.73.136 . +" I've just qualified that as 'Styled ""The Great"" by some admirers'. 13:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) " +"It is unimportant whether she had any prior involvement in editing the page as that is not of the key points of the criticisms made. I have read the BLP policy and ""Delete first, discuss afterwards"" does not seem to be an adequate summary of it. Summary deletion is sanctioned with regard to certain kinds of violation or concern, not generally. None of the concerns cited as justifying summary deletion were applicable in the case of the Alex Jones material since all of the claims made were backed up by a reliable source. " +I hope this gets cleared up soon. I'm not a massive editor, but it is annoying when I want to make minor changes to the few pages I visit a week. I don't want to sound critical, but isn't there a way to block anyone from blocking just anonymous users from an IP, and not those who have registered? +" I have not edited that section and I have not yet reviewed it. However, it really does not matter what editors think, what matters is what experts think and statements made supported by reliable references. If you have them, use them. IF you don't, then it is just bantering opinions, which is not fruitful. -StormRider " +" That's a ""throwback"" to the many years I've spent on Usenet. The is one of several abbreviations that are used there. It signifies a grin. For example, there is the regular grin: and then there is the wide grin: <<>>. It's a quick way to show someone that you are kidding with them, or that your words are ""tongue in cheek"". The predates even smilies. Best of everything to you and yours! –  ( CLIMAX )  " +" Hi David, may I ask, did you post this at Jossi's request? Are you someone who's ever edited the Rawat articles? I think I recall a David at some point. Was that you? In any event, while I agree with the general point that editors shouldn't be ""hunted down"" etc., is that really a fair way to characterize my asking an editor if he's ever been a paid publicist for the article's subject? Do you think that's an irrelevant question, especially in light of Jimbo Wales' saying just the other day that ideally articles shouldn't be edited by interested parties but that it was hard to know who was who given the ease with which people can be anonymous? Besides, Jossi's not anonymous, is he? Sorry, but I find this confusing. Wales says Wikipedia's a free speech forum, Jossi says it isn't. It's all too subtle for me, I'm afraid. " +1. The Israeli version differs from the official version. 2. The official version is that the Israelis should look in Israel for the perpetrators. 3.Benny uses only Israeli sources and is therefore POV.... 4. Please stop using POV.. 5. Use neutral sources... +Beyoncé 120 Million Records What does Beyoncé need for a 120 million record claim? +sdfhy mhy stshy ur face is +The encyclopaedia version (it was property of the USSR) is historically and politically balanced and it is understood as classic, which will 90 years old from the Russian Federation and 80 years old from the USSR. Anyway, there is still our version of the article “Author’s Certificate”. +WD, it seems to me that the fact of Ritter's arrest is well-established and well-sourced. CNN is a reliable source. While the technicalities of the court resolution erased it from his record, Ritter had to acknowledge that the crime occurred in order to win that degree of leniency. WP:BLP is satisfied. I suggest that Jango's edit should stand and, if you'd like, we can continue this on the article Talk page. Skoal. +Samhain & Halloween edits Clicked on Halloween discussion, one German editor Bakulan is trying to rewrite the article how he sees it (apparently German view of having absolutely no pagan celtic origin whatsoever) and has done so to Samhain article, and with no concensus. Noticed you are Swiss so you would be aware of the apparent German view on this which Bakulan is enforcing. My personal knowledge on historical origin is very limited so my input would not be worth much. Having looked at edit history, you have contributed to Samhain page probably more than most, so i thought i'd notify you of this (if you haven't already got it on watchlist of course). +Identity Crisis I agree with whoever put that the Identity Crisis bit needs to be shortened. Trouble is, how do we get rid of the unnecessary stuff without losing the various arguments. Anyone else think a new article might do it? +Thanks Hello and thanks for your kind welcome hope to be working on a wiki project together soon take care and enjoy your weekend. +. Which means people cant edit it +Crapman is a murdering cunt! +Infobox I think the Infobox must be changed from casino to hotel. +Thanks Duk for the info. I knew I would eventually be blocked for my unruly behavior, which you saw too. I feel bad about accusing you of being a partisan hack, like others at WSI. I was wrong, as I have admitted before. My wikipage is not up yet, but here is one example that I have seen: http://www.newmars.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Happy New Year +" Boolean logic involves the theory of sets. And as far as I can see, all information, all communicated scientific information can fit into either or both of the two categories fact, or opinion. So when I get information, I immediately try to fit it into those 2 category sets. But I'm human and live with uncertaincies, and believe in luck, and have hunches etc, which are not consistent with Boolean logic. And I've dealt with the mathematics of probability and know that if we went through that formalized process every time we had to make a decision we'd never get anything done. So as senator Eagleton said about action in the Senate ""We muddle along"". But using strict Boolean logic in today's concepts about scientific phenomena wouldn't get us very far. It would bog down at the travelling twins paradox. But if we took a computer and told it ""Stick to rigid physical logic and go as far as you can and then call me, rather than jumping into hypothetical nonmaterial alternatives, we might be able to move the level of real physical entity calculations down into the level of detail that it would need to really explain some of these natural events. " +By the way,I try to enter into JBJ website and I see only the left part of the page and I can't move it to go to categories. Do you know what can I do with that? +" Third Rate Hacks on the Delete Button but they contribute nothing of Value Its really pathetic to see that a low grade hack like Damac can just go around deleteing everything that upsets his unshakable ignorence. He reigns like a tyrant over the main page, blocking out any facts which conflict with his propaganda line, then when people try to provide Wikipedia users with some genuine information he deletes it. Its funny how he deleted the section ""A short history of Republican Sinn Féin."" Was it because the article showed up his efforts on the main article page for the third rate garbage it is? Censorship and disinformation will be the order of the day until Wikipedia find some genuine people to edit this page - not third rate hacks. Anyway I intend to make a formal complaint to Wikipedia about the behaviour of Damac and Demiurge (if they are not the same person) lets see how they scurry about trying to conceal the evidence of their bias and ignorence." +shut the hell up Zabrak Dragong4 +"* Introduction and Getting started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place before the question. Again, welcome! Faddle " +Mind your own business +If you want to add some more categories, there may well be some that have been missed or overlooked but the ones you have been adding so far are inappropriate or are already covered by more precise sub-categories. Please discuss it on the Talk:Steorn#Hoax page before adding any more. (Talk) +Problems WHY DID YOU DELETE MY FUCKING PAGE YOU NIMROD!!!!!!!!?????????????!!!!!!!! +Wow, Rhymeless isn't such a jerk. He can spell. I'm sure a 10th grade education gives you that luxuary. But seriously folkes, what is this blocking bullshit? Curps is a dickhead. I was making a valid point on this page, and sure I had vandalised Rhymeless's a few times, but I was making a serious point, and then he deleted it. I go to his page and do the same as he did to me, and he blocks me. What's the deal-yo yo? Double standards because he's been around longer than me? How do I get unblocked, and how do I get Curps blocked because 1. He has a stupid name that sounds like a venerial disease; and 2. He blocks me for no good reason? Riff +" Holder was not ""found"" in contempt This article is factually incorrect. " +AndyTheGrump—it is reliable sources that in the final analysis determine whether someone warrants inclusion in this list. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Alex Pettyfer. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +Pure Intuition Yes, it is the same song, in different languages. But, Las de la Intuición is a single and Pure Intuition is a promotional song released for an advertising campaign for SEAT and is not single. Sorry for my bad english. +" A belated welcome! ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jasonreverie. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Editor's index to Wikipedia Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 2veers " +" Your addition was not neutral and it did not cite a reliable source. That is why I removed it. gabsadds " +Love you, . The guy is one of two in the category People excommunicated by the Church of England. (Not Hill...) +You are a fucking dick go fuck yourself +" RfB With A Smile )       " +I wouldn't bother with InaMaka. He has a history of lying about folks to get his way, as well as name calling. +I am lodging an official complaint against the administrators involved. - DP +I'm really grateful for your help with this inferno. 94.192.38.247 +One might say the same about insisting to use the obituary as the only record of birth. +This seems to have been an honest mistake. (Need help? Ask me) +You and Sean will get it coming! I promise! +" Once more, I have again changed Lindsey to Stirling in the article. This is the correct format per Wikipedia WP:MOS. Gee Wiz, leave it alone. reddogsix " +Plagiarized from ... http://www.launcestoncataractgorge.com.au/interpretationcentre.html +Yes, it was probably him. I only put the name how it appears in a Moldavian chronicle, and made a footnote with variants of his name. I too looked to see who exactly was this khan, but I couldn`t find anything. So yes, it`s probably Ahmed Khan. Anyway, I didn`t make it up... So, should I put Ahmed Khan instead of Mamay? +Are you kidding? Which comment can't be verified? That was my comment. That God can't be verified and therefore doesn't exist. Its standard scientific methodology. No evidence equals debunked. Show me evidence of God and I'll happily remove the comments myself. Unbelievable! +E-mail Make your e-mail function operable, or, else, leave an address of your own choice so that one can mail you without writing on the talk page. +Unless you're claiming to have multiple personalities, please leave this matter to the 'committee'. Your personal assessments or preconceived notions are of no interest to me. As you see, I have a right to act defensively. I don't appreciate being subjected to ignorant minds. ... further ignorance will only lead me to call it as I see it. +Edit war at Hydrino theory Please read and understand the policy on edit warring, and review your recent edits to Hydrino theory in that light. Please also consider the three-revert rule policy, which conveys that the hard revert limit (in your case on this issue, one) is a maximum, not an entitlement. You have been posting substantively the same text to this article almost once a day for over a week, and have been reverted by several editors. Clearly, the current consensus is that your favored version is in some way flawed. I will explain my reasons for my stance favoring the current version if you post a cogent explanation of your ideas for improving the article to the talk page. - ~(s)talk~ +"I still cannot believe that there can be a controversy over our national anthem! This is absurd! What the hell happened? Freedom of speech, I am all for it. But this constant BITCHING and whining about political correctness has gone too far. You CANNOT change the Canadian national anthem because it is insulting ""immigrants"". They're IMMIGRANTS, they CHOSE to come to Canada, and it should be that they should respect OUR traditions -though keeping their customs and traditions, I have nothing against multiculturalism-. We cannot bend over backwards for people who have done nothing for the country! It's like subjecting to bullying, it's not bloody right! And the usage of ""God"" and ""son"" means nothing! It's a traditional piece. I am an atheist, and an agnostic, yet I have no objection to prayer in my school's chapel, to singing Christian lyrics, because it pertains no meaning to me. Are not God, Jesus, Allah, Mohammed, Buddha, and ANY other religious deity supposed to all be working for the same cause? Should not they all be ""friends""??? SO may I ask WHAT is the problem with the Canadian anthem? Allah, Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha and God are all manifestations of the SAME PERSON, THING, CAUSE, REASON! The Canadian anthem is traditional, and it seems to me almost a sacrilege (if you may excuse the poor choice of word, as it seems to contradict my whole speech!) to complain about it being sexist, or bigotry. This ties in with the controversy over the Queen. She is a testament to the tradition of Canada, to remove her would be to follow in the footsteps of the United States. We are not Yanks, we are members of the commonwealth. To get back on track, I state clearly, there is absolutely no logical, moral or respectful way that it can be stated to change the lyrics to a traditional song! A song is a song. You cannot opt to change the lyrics to a controversial popular song, like ""The Beatles""! You just don't do it! So HOW should it be the same for the anthem? The anthem represents what Canada is. It was established as Christian, and though we gladly accept other cultures, we cannot change every damn thing to be politically correct for all the minorities out there. It's IMPOSSIBLE. Freedom of speech has become the opposite. Comedians can't make jokes about religion, sexuality, gender without being complained at, reprimanded at by minorities. Australia is a perfect example of how a country should be run. They say to immigrants: ""You make the choice to live here. That means you have to live with the way Australians live, Australian code, Australian traditions. Don't come here expecting us to change just for you."" This is how a country should be. It seems unfair that we should change everything to be politically correct, just so that some bleeding heart out there can go to their bed -Oh, is that politically incorrect to the homeless? I'll change that to ""area of rest""- and not grumble and whine, prepared to get up the next morning and petition to change all the lyrics of gospel music, or to remove all films that even mention a religious deity in a disrespectful manner. Please, I beg, I PRAY, (God forbid, heheheh) that we all come to our senses and realize ""Don't sweat the small stuff"". Get on, toughen up, put your helmet on, keep on trucking. It's an imperfect world, you can't have your way all the time. If someone at high school insults you, you ignore it. You stay away from them. SO? Does that not apply to here? Please, chew on this rather large- and I do apologize for its length- paragraph. 64.180.211.200 " +No problem, but be more careful with your password in future -) +John Stallings I created a stub for Stallings. I just included enough information to avoid deletion. Could you add some flavor: why he is important wiki link out to some of his contributions basic bio (ensure he is american, ensure he current works at UCB, find his year of birth) Thanks for your other related articles! +I cannot report it anywhere since I am blocked at the moment. Bakharev's accusation was based on the fact that the user returned my edits on one article, nothing else. There is nothing strange about it since almost any Finn would replace those Swedish names with Finnish ones when talking about Finnish speaking cities in Finland. A Svecoman accused me of being a sock in fi.wiki too but I requested that IP-detector be used and I was proven innocent , it could be done here too if some people are really so paranoid. +Thank you SO MUCH for your Nazi-like oversight! ...but you can shove your advice up your ass. I just like messing with self-important dickheads who think they know everything, and damned if Wikipedia isn't full of them. Signed, your number one dirty Jew fan, Mel Gibson. +" When you say, ""The content of the article is not the issue,"" I hope you are speaking for yourself. For some of us, the content of the article is the only issue. I've been through this same thing on many articles, including al Qaeda. In the end, it didn't matter what people thought of me. The only thing that mattered is that the NPOV tag was removed and has stayed off ever since. We finally have an article for al Qaeda that conveys information and is stable. That same thing can be done with terrorism. There are only a few people here who are trying to keep terrorism undefined. If we concentrate on the article, instead of letting them confuse the issue, we can get the job done. I have proposed this definition, not as something perfect, but as something that conveys information—-a starting point. The purpose of a definition is to convey information, so that much is a bare minimum. I think my proposal is a step in the right direction because it more closely matches for what I believe a great article should encompass. " +" Lamar Odom edit Thanks for the message. I reverted the edit because there is no evidence in the citations for any kind of police investigation for child endangerment. The encyclopedia can't say something that isn't verifiable, so I reverted down to the last version without a claim of child endangerment. Regardless of your protest, the Yahoo URL to which you refer and the ESPN article (the [1] citation in the current version) are identical. Take a look for yourself. When published, verifiable reports come out about the actual cause of death, as I'm sure they will soon, the facts can be included in the entry and you're free to do so. Until it's a fact, however, it can't go in this article. I stand by my edit. take a swing " +foot fetishes are awesome fuck you 68.228.72.192 +", 2 December 2008 (UTC) The links have to be examined to see which ""Harris"" is intended. Usually, the context in the linking article makes this clear, but sometimes the best you can do is leave a hidden comment that the link needs to be disambiguated, and let someone else figure out which ""Harris"" is the correct one. 21:26" +AM making a formal complaint about your biased stance I have more than enough evidence, how you have SELECTIVELY erased certain UN-orthodox POV which YOU deem unacceptable! So in which case, i will ask, does WIKI accept the un-orthodox churchs POV, or ONLY THE ORTHODOX CHURCH! and ALSO, will question your ability on integrity, where you HAVE SELECTED THREE PASSAGES, with minimal scholary debate, in which the scholars you DEBATED agree that no meat eating passages exist, BUT IN YOUR BIASED STANCE, YOU HAVE PROTECTED ONLY AN ORTHODOX POV! +I don't give a damn either way. +" CPL, I'd like to review the Chessmetrics discussion at Proj Chess page, you're making several assertions, and not knowing the background vis-a-vis Chessmetrics, can't form an opinion whether I think you're right or not. But I do think at this point you are incorrect in what you state about some of the content you've been removing from articles (more than what you said). Also, I don't undrstand why you are removing content, like matches and match records, based on ""I can't find it and it wasn't sourced"". (You should be using {{citation needed}} tag for that, rather than wholescale immediate deletion.) How do you suppose that content got there in the first place? (It seems there are three possibilities: 1) someone had a source they didn't identify, 2) someone had a source but got something mixed up, or 3) they invented it out of their head.) In any case, the thing to do is tag it and give the editor time to source it. I have no interest or desire to ""argue"" with you, CPL. But when I see what are IMO bogus arguments intended to be the basis for removal of contents (be they article content, categories, whole articles via AfD), then I'm bound to express my thought which might counter your opinions. When you tried to stick words in Fischer's mouth he never said regarding his strength compared to Morphy's, an effort which ended up opposed by me & Quale and which you proved by contacting the author was taken out of context by you, you challenged me why I would ""nit-pick even the slightest of [your] edits"". I ended up protecting the article, did't I? (And, you violated policy understanding & execution of WP:BRD also, unacknowleged by you.) When you tried to insist an incendiary, accusatory Youtube video should be included in Dawn Marie Psaltis BLP, in violation of WP:BLPREMOVE, you reverted an IP user who removed the material calling the IP's removal an act of vandalism, and you reverted me (edit-warred) even though you were in the wrong about BLP policy and again dismissing the Talk I opened with edit summary explaining the material was a violation of BLP policy and please see Talk, since you reverted me without first going to Talk. Once again I helped protect that article (and Wikipedia since it was a BLP), against your efforts to compromise it. So you see, CPL, I have no interest in ""arguing"" with you or even engaging in debate with you. I've seen how you argue your points, and I thoroughly disagree with your tactics, and many times your logic. You want me to go into a corner and not speak up when I see you violating policy and compromising articles? If you find that a nuisance, then, good. No one on Wikipedia has called me anything other than my username, or abbreviation IHTS. What makes you think I'm gonna receive your informal ""dude"" anything but insulting? I do. (And you linked to your posts here to show example of your level of collaboration with me and avoidance of ""squabbles""?!) " +At this time I think Crusio should reduce the size of his wiki page as he would be the best judge of what should be on the page. I suggest he do this in order to spare others from having to do so. +WIKI > YOU That's right! Wiki is right and you are wrong! Just accept the facts! The facts that are published on wiki! +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cod. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" By the way, you ARE NOT BRITISH. Take time off for your own warped pleasure, but the Jubilee belongs to us. When you swear a loyal oath to Her Majesty you can maybe think about asking to celebrate the Jubilee. As an American, talking about it just makes you sound like a tit. Chan " +My 2 cents: Aaron's claim: Y is true because: If X then Y. MrVoluntarist's argument: If X then Z; Z is false; therefore not X. Thus Aaron's argument is invalid. Note that MrVoluntarist's argument doesn't prove Y is false; it simply proves that Y is true because: If X then Y is not a valid argument. If MrVoluntarist had said that Aaron's claim was Z, that would have been a strawman. But MrVoluntarist simply showed to Aaron's satisfaction that X was false. That is not a strawman; that's simply pointing out a false premise. X is If an action is violent, then it is wrong.Y is The violent act of shooting trespassers is wrong.Z is The violent act of fighting in a war is wrong.'' +" Bridge name continued from WT:RJL#Inclusion of major water bodies Ref 1: https://gis.mainroads.wa.gov.au/roadinformationmap/ → tick ""Structure"" (in map contents on the left). Search (top left) → Search all → type in ""1612"" → gives result ""Structure (1): Murray River & Pinjarra Road"". Click on ""Murray River & Pinjarra Road"" to expand the details, which includes ""Crossing Name: Murray River & Pinjarra Road"". So that's what Main Roads says the crossing name is. If you want to look at some others, 1168→Redcliffe Bridge, 0914 and 0932 → the Causeway (Perth end and Vic. Park end), and 0608→Clackline Bridge. - 37 [talk] " +Support as per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names and the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes). The section Wikipedia:Article titles#Precision also applies given that Tahltan is a redirect here. There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title. +Death Magnetic WP:ALBUM#LEAK says that the date an album was leaked onto the Internet is usually not notable, unless it resulted in some other action that is notable, such as being directly responded to by the musical artist or their management, or the leak itself receiving broad media coverage. Since it can be verified that Lars shared his direct response to the leak, that pretty much makes the leak notable in the article. +Although it is good, it is a HUGE block of information. Please divide that in paragraphs to make it visually attractive. +Users on NTL seem to be randomly switched between their cache servers - I've been both 62.252.192.8 and 62.252.192.9 recently. 17:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) +Um. Contrabass and contra-alto clarinets are not that rare, not at all. +" There was no consensus to move to langoustine, which was indeed a very bad idea. The proponent of that move explicitly approved a move to the scientific name, and it also seems the best title to me. I was therefore bold enough to go ahead and make that move. Do you have any reason to believe it is not the best title? ""Norway lobster"" is the most authoritative ""common name"" for the species, and there were doubts in some quarters as to whether it was good enough. In such circumstances, the scientific name really is the only alternative. " +" It won't be long, this misuse of tools will soon be resolved, this INVOLVED and policy-fail block will be the end of the beginning for so-called ""admin"". " +) (Oh, I see you've taken care of that already too - thanks again!) +" Talk Let's go Lightning! " +'s official site and Hendrick's driver page for him) +Adding image to your new article Greetings, since the subject is deceased, you can upload one photo of this person under WP:Fair use. Please see Wikipedia:Uploading images for details. If you get confused in the process, visit WP:Teahouse for advice from volunteer mentors. +" Thanks for looking at this one for me. I think I've addressed everything you've raised here, let me know if there's anything else you think needs seen to. X " +It's not stupid, it's a valid thing to do. Every match result isn't notable. +" Support agree with " +And finally, I suspect I am beginning to understand the purpose of the respect to our subject. +I can expand the article and provide notability. +"Thank you for experimenting with the page Extra-sensory perception on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Talk   " +" No problem, you know what they say... ""When all else fails, read the directions!"". " +you have a sandy vagina +Music Hey she won this ? Also this is not the main page song meltdown is not on the list ? +STOP DELETING MY POSTS! YOU ALL HATE AMERICA AND YOULL PAY! +by CheckUser, along with 7 other accounts. –MuZemike }} +" . BLACKEST BACK MAN . " +" Actually, a producer on Superman homepage seemed to imply that the continuity is a mixture of Smallville and the movies. The producer said ""We won't be dealing with Superman's origin, because if you're under 30, Smallville is your origin story, and if your over 30, the Christopher Reeve movies are your origin story."" Plus, this version of Lex seems to be closer to Mike Rosenbaum than Gene Hackman." +I did read through it. It real easy to do. You goto the site and read it. +Please answer me. Why are you reverting my edits? +" MarshalN20 response Dear AGK, thank you very much for the note you left on my talk page. I am currently busy with work & studies to provide a thorough response, so I will provide a quick list: Lecen submitted the RfM yesterday (from my side of the world). About a day has passed, and yet the user has been frantically badgering people with demands of action (, , , and ). His distraught actions hold no more common sense than a squirrel looking for a nut. Lecen incorrectly claims that I am a user ""involved"" in the dispute. My only contributions to the article include a copy-edit of the lead () and a reversion of Lecen's vandalism (). The dispute itself is between Lecen and Cambalachero. I am a third party to the dispute. Lecen claims that I am not a third party because I am in favor of Cambalachero's point of view. The people in the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard were mostly (if not all) against Lecen. He conveniently tries to ignore these things, but I think it would be good to make a list of them here: Go Phightins (Mediator, ): ""I advocated your position [MarshalN20] and refuted his [Lecen], for the most part, in the DRN."" Amadscientist (commentator, ): ""[M]y intitial concern is balance by Lecen. The editor seems to have more than a less than disinterested POV on the subject and it does certainly show in the editors remarks, posts and requests. The first source I found is also the first source prsented in the Third Opinion and appears terribly cherry picked."" Binksternet (commentator, ): ""Use WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV to name those who say Rosas was a dictator, and to name those who say he was something else. I don't think it is fruitful to demand that historians be found who say directly 'Rosas was not a dictator'."" Wdford (commentator, ): ""It seems to me just from this thread that a number of sources do not regard Rosas as a dictator. On that basis alone, I feel we should have a statement that ""some see him as a dictator and others as something else"". [...] I would recommend that we therefore mention that both opinions exist re Rosas, and hopefully the article contains enough background as to let the reader understand both perspectives in his original historical context."" Based on all this points, I see no need for any further mediation. Plenty of third opinions have already been provided (including my own) to the dispute between between Lecen and Cambalachero. Lecen asked for third opinions, he got them, and yet continues to game the system looking for someone to agree with him. I kindly request you, AGK, to please stop Lecen from WP:GAMING the system. Regards. | Talk " +Yeah, i won't go away because you want me to. I'll go away when i feel my time here is done. Your memory must be fading with age, as i only redirect and tagged articles for problems, i didn't edit content. I suggest you go back and see that. As of now, i wish to have nothing to do with you. I never want to see you writing on my talk page. And more importantly, realize your age. Twice my age would mean you're 37. And the only person you feel you can push around is a 17-year old? You are so mature. This conversation is dissolved and our association terminated. 4:09 15 January 2012 (UTC) +(to play Junior Davis Cup) +" My apologies, I want not trying to remove anything... i noticed some content had been removed and I went and clicked ""undo edit"" but it appears the paste person ""Dennis"" had not only removed content but also tried to erase his previous erase. I think this user needs to be blocked from editing this have as he is deleting significant information from this site without reason. I will try to reset it back to where it was a few days ago before this user started deleting info. Bear with me I'm just trying to get it back to where it was before he started destroying info." +http://twitter.com/phoenixreporter - HACK THIS FUCKER ACCOUNT AND KILL User:Zhanzhao !!! FUCK HIS FAMILY AND HIS GIRLFRIEND!!! WAHAHAHA YOU HAVE TO BLOCK ME FOR A YEAR TO STOP ME ASSHOLES!!! +" Why on earth should it say that? It's clear that not all Muslims say any particular thing; there are at least a billion of them. Your suggestion is redundant at best. (talk) " +No hurry. I think about blake more and more these days; but it seems like such a monster of a project. And it would be a beast of an FAC. The talk page is heated enough, but at FAC? I shudder to think. +" Plurals are not usually listed in the dictionary. Try looking it up under its singular form, ""magisterium"". Here, for instance. " +this 6 mil.. is the biggest lie in history !! +, 13 June 2007 (UTC) We should also speak to 's concernes below 17:50 +The problem is not only or perhaps even primarily with companies, but with non profit organizations, and pressure groups of all sorts. The problem is not primarily with skilled PR professionals, but less skilled people assigned to it, or simply amateurs. There's a good deal of COI editing of companies and products done by fans of the products, not by the companies, and some degree of conflict of interest permeates most of Wikipedia. Almost everything I ever worked on is either because I am interested in it, or want to show off my virtuosity. And I agree with Dennis that in most cases we might as well deal with COI on the article page directly, as with other edits. King4057, and others, have asked me at times to approve article drafts they have COI with I have refused to do so, because I will not take the responsibility for something I have not written, beyond seeing it is not blatantly objectionable. Let COI editors declare the affiliations, and then their edits will be judged appropriately. The only time that an edit needs approval on a talk p. is when it is dealing with something that is obviously susceptible, such as removing inconvenient facts. The true question is the same with this approach as with prohibiting direct COI editing: how do we deal with COI editing from people who do not declare it. I see only two approaches. One is to have an high index of suspicion for every edit that might be influenced by conflict of interest, in essence abandoning the principle of Assuming Good Faith. The difficulty here is that very few can write material that is truly at a standard of sourcing that is proof against the possibility of bad faithit requires not only that statements be sourced, but being confident that all the sources have been examined and fairly considered and judge in context. Very little in enWP meets that standard. This would require actual research and fact checking at a degree which is beyond our capabilities, and amounting to what is done by the most careful editorial review. This is not work for amateurs. It is easy to say, that if our standards are sufficiently high COI will not matter, but this The other approach is to require all editors to be identified. The principle of permitting anonymous editing makes us vulnerable; it is necessary for those working on certain topics, but there it might have to be assured by some confidential mechanism for assigning names. Either approach means a radical change in Wikipedia. The only simple approach is the same we have used for other problems: patiently remove the worst of it, and go from there. '''''' ( talk ) +Lot (real estate) What sort of wikifying do you think should be done to Lot (real estate) ? Dividing it up into sections? +" Actually, I wanted fix cluebot to be a separate edit. I forgot that I was in the undo editing template. You can argue if it's inappropriate all you want. The real issue is that it's spot on and will lead to Xenophrenic being less of a disruption while he's POV pushing. This has led to him being butthurt, much like you must be in spending so much time posting diffs here and at AN/I. Talk " +Question It seems that IP 98.179.149.193 has been causing trouble. I am wondering if (And how) to bring this to a Administrator. Thanks, +I should stay out of this altogether, probably. But for the record: I have no problem with the pink unicorn. I also have no problem with the Lady if indeed she is an atheist and were to support it on her blog and at her place of employmentI have never seen her disparage one Wikipedia edit or another for religious reasons. I also don't have a problem with Keepscases's non-atheism (I don't want to presume what they areit's none of my business); since they don't have a lot of edits in articles, I can't tell if their opinion interferes with our various guidelines. Also for the record: SnottyWong shouldn't have said what they said, of course, though I understand where it's coming from (I live in the South). Finally, I have nothing but respect for those who quote Milton. Thanks Kiefer. I hope you have pleasant dreamsmaybe you'll wake up and recite Book 13 of Paradise Lost to your amanuensis. +" ""you Will be blocked"" is much different than ""I will block you"". And, as shown by at least two other editors, you have violated policies and guidelines. Once again, I am not going to continue to argue. EØ Ŧ'''''' " +"::(As written by English peasant): ""If you re-read what I said, Mariano, Nanonic and Selecciones are the respected editors, please ensure that you actually understand what people are saying before you start ranting on."" lol. (My Reply): Okay, go ahead with your little Mafia, ""Respected Editors."" " +"As for ""points out,"" if everyone else is cool with its use here, OK. " +Support per nom. talk +Hi Hellknowz, I didn't bother setting up version control because it was a quick thing, which was rather foolish because of course it turned out to be not so quick. -) I'll get it up on github and get you push privileges. +I agree RT does have a few shortcomings, but it's certainly a breath of fresh air from the Anglo-Saxon propaganda machine. I like being in touch with the world's goings-on, but consistent one-sided view from the likes of BBC/CNN is just not interesting anymore, so much so that very few people in the UK can support an unbiased political debate; and yes, it's deliberately and explicitly anti-Russian. Watching Al Jazeera, RT, NewsAsia gives me much more rounded view. As for US channels - how can you show burning Tskhinval (South Ossetia) and claim it's the Georgian city of Gori??? So my personal choice is avoiding such nonsense...but, as is clearly evidenced here by the wide anti-Russian rhetoric, it works on others...Well done, RT, you must be doing something right if successfully ruffling those complacent feathers and breaking lies the west peddles about your country... 218.186.17.229 +"""Holland"" is a much more attractive trade name and the Dutch would be wise to stick to it. The fact that 3-nippled cousinfuckers in the East and the South resent it is just tough shit for them. " +" I could have responded and explain every difference that betsythedevine provided above, but I will not bother. There's no use. I am guilty in nothing. Gwen Gale, don't worry. I am not going to post unblock request or/and appeal the block. I have done nothing to be blocked for, and you still did not present any differnces to support the claim of wikihounding and personal attacks because the above differences are not personal attacks . I have never done anything in purpose to harass and/or wikihound anybody. I was wikihounded and harass way too much myself to do this to anybody. This SPI I filed could have been filed as a mistake, in a hurry, but it was not filed in bad faith and it was not filed to harass anybody. I myself was the subject of 2 SPI with much less (practically no evidences) They both were approved, were run, came back as ""unrelated"" and nobody ever got even warn over any of them leave alone blocked. " +" I'm flexible on the title and have no objection to calling the article by the person's name, but that was objected to in the AfD. If it's been changed sufficiently then maybe it's worth another try. If the predent form of title is going to be used I think maybe something more specific than ""victim's rights"" should be used. Home defense? I don't have a good answer. ) " +Also, it is clearly stated that the numbers are somewhat speculative. So the current setup seemed to me accurate and honest. So I reverted ) +GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Moving On (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose quality: B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. Has an appropriate reference section: B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage? A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail: +" Really, Supreme Deliciousness, why are you wasting everyone's time making a suggestion that have no chance of success under Wikipedia npov guidelines? Or is it just meant to be a distraction? ""Occupied"" implies a military occupation. " +Umm... Midwest Airlines is BASED OUT OF MILWAUKEE and is probably the company most closely associated with Milwaukee behind Miller and Harley. Not to mention that is has a greater presence both locally (Midwest Airlines Center ring a bell?) and nationally. Besides, airlines generally tend to have greater visibility than financial companies. +" ""Palestine"" Why is ""Palestine"" continuously listed as a country? I does not have a government with sovereignty over its claimed areas. This is a controversial position to hold, by listing it as a country. 124.180.167.228 " +" August 2008 (UTC) If ""an article's name must be free from significant ambiguity, and should be clear"", then how is an ""invasion of Manchuria"" relevant to the content of the article? (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:01, 3" +I am not a banned user. I have yet to see anyone contact me to verify. Just trolling and garbage posts to my page. anyone with a spine can call me to verify. 71.219.49.171 +" People Are Starting Edit-Wars WIth Me Dear Mrs. IanManka (nice name you have there!), There is a lobby of WikiUsers who are starting edit wars with me and scrutinizing every last word I write. The only reason is because I had a ""unsable background"" and used to be a WikiVandal. But I've Changed! And now they are cyber-bullying me and planning on blocking me. Please help. They keep calling in their friends to join in a post bans on me, but I have no one to stick -up for me! You may remember me, as I became quite famous for my excessive vandalism way back in '08. Anyways, please try to help out. Next time they say anything rude or offensive, I will come straight to you, and I am fully confident you'll be there to help out! Thank you so much, Mrs. IanManka (did I mention you have such a beautiful name?) Regardingly, -Yahya Al-Shiddazi (Famous retired WikiVandal)" +, 7 February 2009 (UTC) The two aren't really at odds with each other... They're different, sure, but not contradictory. 22:20 +Hopefully 's edit is a compromise acceptable to all. It neatly sidesteps the problem of which of differentiation with respect to the sole parameter or with respect to a specific variable x the prime denotes, and also allows it to be regarded more formally as an operator. —Quondum +Are you a Wiki moderator? +Thanks for clearing that out for me. I am still new and probably have lost my temper, I am sorry for that. Back to the article now. The band is under Mediaskare Records record label, which according to WP:BAND's 5th criteria for musicians and ensembles should be considered one of the more important indie labels and the band has released exactly two albums with them , so the band should be considered notable too. +No, I think it's somebody sitting on the toilet going poop. — +" It was here, in the Roesgen Talkk page where you said: ""Enough with the teabaggers who pop up every few days, we should try to have the article semi-protected again. Remember folks, this is a BLP"" As it was both in direct response to my edit - and I was the only person active there at all in the last three weeks or so, and it was in a section of talk that I had started and been the only one posted in - I took it as directed at me. I was then told by the other owner, ""If you aren't one, then he wasn't talking to you."" This was my response: 'Bullshit. You don't attack the only person you're having a discussion with and ask for the article to be locked and then defend it by saying, 'well, if your not one - then he's not talking to you'. The accusation is the attack and nothing I've said or done here, nor in my recent edit history at the Republican congressman's article referenced above indicates any bias. I notice however that the home page of one of the two editors standing sentry over his pet article has dozens of claims of profound liberal bias proudly festooned across the page like a Volvo in Vermont on it's way to the Northeast Kingdom. One usually finds such committed and messianic people to be deeply wedded to their cause and saturated to the bone with inflexible bias - whether on the left, right or third way. False unsubstantiated accusations, blatant bias, article ""ownership"" and the complete lack of any effort to defend the inclusion of drivel, garbage and fluff into the encyclopedia is ridiculous and nothing more has been done by the ""guards"" than revert, attack and ignore''.99.141.246.39 " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! From one Clemson grad to another, welcome to Wikipedia. +I did some searching online, and it turns out that the hymn is the preface to the Isavasya Upanishad, which is contained in the Yajur Veda. +" I guess he is objecting to inclusion of ""major economist"". I have added a reference for it, although it's not really need. Thing " +" Wikipedia Neutrality & This Biography Page I think it is fairly obvious by now, looking at the enormous amount of commentary over minutia detail over the last few weeks here on Deepak's page, that there is a handful group of editors posting and editing Deepak Chopra's biography here that belong to the Skeptics society and/or are well known Guerilla Skeptics (who have published videos of their Guerilla tactics on Youtube). I would not be surprised if some of them are getting well paid for their work. Their willingness to go to any lengths to ban, harass, or IMO wear-out other contributing editors (who disagree with their view points) and willingness to use whatever tactics they can to promote their Skeptics society Point-of-View of credible scientists like Deepak or Rupert Sheldrake, or Frederic Myers, or Ian Stevenson or even William James, all of which the biographies here on Wikipedia have been modified in a very POV slanted manner (by many of these same small group of editors, sometimes in a very insidious labeling manner, such as calling Deepak Chopra a new-age Guru, or mentioning early on that Ian Stevenson was a ""gullible individual"" etc. I really do wonder how Wikipedia can continue to maintain there is any kind of veridical neutrality being practiced here? I think it would be a good idea to bring in a whole new set of editors (or only allow a new set of editors) come in and rework some of the pages I have mentioned above, without the involvement of the Guerilla Skeptics here. Perhaps a set of well-known editors that have established themselves on Wikipedia now for many years - could come in, and provide a fair and balanced approach to the biographies of Deepak Chopra, or Rupert Sheldrake, or Ian Stevenson etc. None of which will be achieved IMO given the obvious agenda that has the foot prints - again of these few, extremely biased and active editors here. 159.118.158.122 " +" *A* pioneer, yes. ""The"" pioneer ? You'll get a lot of flack on that one ) Have to agree with you on ""Mondo Porras"" tho. Who the heck was he ? And yes, I worked in a shop building and selling performance parts for bikes back in 1970. Kosman Specialties predated about 98% of the 'chopper builders' running around today claiming credit." +Yes of course - it was supposed to have the word motorcycle - it has now thanks +" I won't object if you revert it, but in context ""convention against torture"" does not clutter the quotation, violate the principle of leaving quotations unchanged, or mislead or confuse the reader. To the contrary, it keeps the quotation intact yet still clarifies which convention against torture is being alluded to, and offers the interested reader a chance to effortlessly jump to a full explanation if desired. " +Impact on plastics recycling? Does rubber toughening make plastics difficult or impossible to recycle? Most recycling processes require purifying the material to prevent process contamination. It seems possible that a toughening coating may not be separable and may foul the purification process, but I am not a polymer engineer or scientist. +1898 VFL Grand Final Please have a look at 1898 VFL Grand Final. I hope it meets your requirements now, and I hope that you can remove your template, etc. Also, thatns for your comments. +" Support — I was initially against the move because I was concerned about updating all the links and redirects, but your assurance that that won't be much of an issue has lead me to change my mind. -PRIME " +" Wii 'critisism'? First reports of ""tennis elbow"" by playing the Wii, could be included in a section of possible adverse health effects of playing? (link http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6162355.html?) " +Apparently the write did not get permission from Miss Greenwald to post this material in the article and has requested the appropriate removal. If you have any questions, email her. +ANI Hi Ricky, just to let you know that I've mentioned you at an ANI thread, Balkans related of course, and your input of whatever kind would be welcome. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Incipient_edit_war_at_Josip_Broz_Tito. Thanks, +" Paragraphs vs section headers Sorry, didn't mean to imply it didn't have ""merit"", any good faith edit on Wikipedia has merit. What I'm saying is, section breaks and paragraph breaks are similar, the question is when to use one vs the other. Paragraph breaks provide logical breaks in the content. In this case there is a new section header at the top of almost every paragraph, which is redundant, that's what paragraphs are made for. By adding those section headers, I believe, it chops up the article which discourages reading it as a single block of text from top to bottom, and encourages skimming and skipping, like reading an outline that hasn't been filled in, or a ""list of"" sort of thing, rather than a chronological and somewhat inter-related history of the origin of the high five. If we thought those origin theories were going to be greatly expanded.. say 4 or 5 or more paragraphs each.. I could see section headers making more sense, but until then, I believe it reads better as a single block of text. Green Cardamom (talk) I see what you're saying, but I disagree. I think it looks better the way it is now, especially with the long block quote in the first section. I mean, the other option to me is bullets, but I think we both would agree that's not that aesthetically pleasing. Without some kind of division, it makes it harder to see that the three options are mutually exclusive, or arose independently at best. Without the divisions, in my opinion, it sounds like one origin narrative that all together led to the high five, rather than three separate possibilities. " +" Hello, Zmjb37 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |}" +Newsflash!! Schuminweb is GAY!! +Dear Huon, Thanks for allowing me. It was a very kind example setting gesture by you. I have found so many links. I want to share those for your attention. Accordingly I want to propose a fresh edit request but since you have already proposed an edit, I am a bit hesitant to counter propose a WP Admin. It may also face strong resistant and harsh statements by because of his new career in WP and may be by . So tell me should I propose a fresh edit or should just provide the links with objections to edit recommended by you. I strongly request for fresh edit request but what ever you allow out of two, I will accept and proceed. +Re: Daft Punk The names are there to clarify which person is in each helmet. This is also the standard for captions of photos featuring a band. +Despicable Me No, of course the creators do not say that Gru resembles Grimly Feendish. But look the pictures on the wiki page and it's obvious, in the same way that Feendish resembles Fester from the Addams family. This is not a criticism, merely an observation and should stand. +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Paper cup, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:LuK3my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) " +Hello and thanks for your feedback. I could not find any studies done on this technique nor any significant critiques.( ) +" I don't have any strong preference, but it seems to me that such locative phrases (at least from a Western perspective) would be regarded as a type of adverbial phrase (corresponding to adverbs of location). Also their position in the Chinese sentence is as described in the main ""Adverbs"" section. " +And maybe this is valid with places whitch had sizeable German minorities in the past, but Tábor or Hradec Králové were without significant minority +" Hi, Pompous Ass! ;) I know you think you're some kind of poker authority on Wikipedia, and that it's somehow your perogative to give the Imperial final thumbs up or thumbs down on what's acceptable regarding anything to do with poker here, but guess what? That's not the case. You are one of MANY arrogant, conceited, self-absorbed losers that populate Wikipedia who use this site as some sort of self-esteem builder, because here you can act like a ""big man"", and make unilateral decisions on what's acceptable or unacceptable here. The edits I have made (and will continue to make) on the Jack Straus entry regarding his death doesn't violate policy in ANY way. If I had the time or the inclination, I could spend several months quoting entries and instances on Wikipedia where editorial verbiage is used. You are simply a pompous ass who thinks you are the gatekeeper of anything poker-related on Wikipedia. You are not, and you will not censor me. And as I'm sure you've already realized, my ISP address constantly changes, so you won’t be able to block me, either. So piss off. ;)" +Delete Can you delete these pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CrazyAces489/jose https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CrazyAces489/Hugo_Duarte https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CrazyAces489/Luta_livre_esportiva +Fairmind Wiki Hi Joseph, Why is The page Fairmind not good? It is just a article about a social media network. There are a lot on Wikipedia look https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites If you find you are still right, ofcourse I delete the page ;) Friendly regards +Guys, it's just simply me that put there Moldovans (Romanians) 78,2%, and I was not logged in, and don't give quickly the fault on Bonaparte, he's gone from longtime now from this bullshit of Wikipedia, 'cause there's no purpose with hypocritic people like you. I modified that, everybody knows that that's Moldovans and Romanians are the same shit, anyhow the census will say it. They speak Romanian, and not Moldovan how they sustain. A Romanian understands perfectly when a Moldovan is speaking it's fuckin' language called Moldovan, and vice versa. Moldovans are doing this because they are a gang of betrayers and retarded that don't have idea what's their ancestry. Let's be reasonable now, even if I think that you people here are too stupid to understand this. They were Romanians until 1940, and suddenly they changed of ethnicity because they are an different country than Romania. ' 10 June 2006 +Ed Schultz IPsocks Ugh. See . +All done with the refs now. '''''''''' (samtal) +Keep shilling, buddy. It's noble work you're doing. I'll keep spreading the truth about your criminal organization. +" Aztec society Gidday Richard, I note that you've swapped some text about between Aztec society and Daily life in the Aztec Empire articles. I think it's fine to rationalise the arrangement on these topics, however I have some reservations about the latter of these two articles. It was one of a brace of Aztec and Maya articles (see for eg Mayan Trade, Mayan Food) all created around the same time in September by about 4 or 5 first-time editors, and they all have the hallmark of coming from some more extensive essay on the subject area. I'm not saying that there's copyvio involved here, my guess would be that it's almost like some joint class assignment has been broken up into separate articles. They are based on reasonable material, but they contain a number of evident misinterpretations and have more of a school essay feel to them. They need considerable work and rearranging, and in some instances I really wonder whether it is worth the effort as they cut across topics already covered in the main Aztec/Maya articles. Just so as you know and something to bear in mind if distributing their contents across other articles. The images which came with the Daily Life article are also I believe mis-tagged as the contributor's own work, when clearly they seem to be taken from elsewhere. Anyways, keep up the good work, and cheers | TALK " +, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Aren't reviews and opinions on a film (which is basically what the controversy section is about) POV by their very nature? I mean, a film critic by definition gives their opinion of a film, and thus every film review and opinion of it is POV. - 02:51 +" Thanks. I am quite concerned that he will drive other editors away with his ""my way or the highway"" attitude. " +Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Www.arabojobs.com) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +2007 (UTC) Edison was not an atheist. An atheist don't believe in any kind of God - personal or impersonal. I don't think that Edison's views were fairly consistent with Einstein's. Einstein was an agnostic. See: List of agnostics. Edison was probably a deist. He didn't believe in a theistic God; however, he believe in some kind of supreme intelligence. And, he did say that 'Religion is all bunk' and he clearly didn't believe in a personal God. 13:18, 28 September +". Whilst I feel that this is probably diverting into a debate rather than discussing the article, I do think this reveals one of the fundamental flaws with this article. It bases its observations, which IMHO verge at the very least on Original research, on how a particular country implements its digital TV system. For example, GeorgeFormby1 misses a great deal of context about the British situation which is relevant here, such as: Digital TV in the UK is strongly influenced by Freeview (and its soon to be launched sister Freesat), which are subscription free digital TV systems that the BBC (the UK's very dominant (compared to the US) public broadcaster is the key stakeholder in. As pointed out by , Freeview boxes now retail at around £20 (actually around $40). Although, it may seem a lot to pensioners in the US it is small compared to the annual, compulsory, Television licence fee of around £130per year ($260). Europe has traditionally had a much stronger regulatory framework with regards to broadcasting. Where as, (if i understand correctly) in the US, cities are well served and rural areas often poorly served (in some cases having to pay to have affiliates and stations from other markets relayed to them so they can actually have a TV service at all), most of the traditional ""analogue"" channels in the UK and Europe(in the UK: BBC1, BBC2, ITV, C4 and to a slighlty lesser extent Five, whose availability is constrained by the amount of bandwidth that was left in Europe by the time it started in 1997) are obliged as part of their licence to be available universally i.e. In the UK, >98% coverage of the UK landmass. This means that European airwaves tend to be very crowded and together with the stronger licensing rules means that there are relatively few analogue channels (UK homes get 4 or 5 channels, and 6 in a *small* number of cities, where (usually) community groups are given a *low* power licence.) The above therefore identifies the reason why a lot of European countries had an appetite for more channels when digital TV came along. The restricted space available, particularly terrestrially, has meant that channels tend to be crammed into the available space, and indeed some digital channels have a very poor picture quality compared to a good analogue signal. But this only tells half the story, implementations vary even in one country, for example in the UK compare the bit-rates of BBC1 digital are at about ~6Mbps compared to those on Mux A which run at <2Mbps (e.g. Five Life et al). Thus, the resultant picture quality is purely down to the implementation, that various multiplex owners have chosen to take and is not indicative of digital TV in general. Indeed, as I understand in the US, where homes generally have a much greater number of channels but are ""afflicted"" with the inferior NTSC system. The application of digital TV has generally been to deliver HDTV as opposed to large quantities of new channels... ... and indeed that brings the question of what it is all for! In the UK and Europe large swathes of digital space are reserved for the public broadcasters (without getting into a debate over whether all this space is used for programming that is truely public service), post digital switch-over this will allow every home in the UK to access free-to-air and terrestrially (the way most people receive TV in the UK) channels such as BBC Parliament (coverage of parliament), BBC News 24 (likely to be the UK's only free-to-air rolling news channel before long), BBC Four (""high brow"" arts and culture), Teachers TV (a channel for Teachers), etc, etc,. " +youre a little faggot who dosent know me you faggot go suck a dick +by being the easiest way, and +Re: Rigby and Regional Council His appointment hasn't been made official yet, though he's already been seen hanging around the council building in Thorold with the St. Catharines delegation. St. Catharines officially decides on his future on the 20th. Legally, they could hold a byelection to replace Partington, but in all previous cases they've just appointed the 7th place finisher when it was so close to the actual November election. +Leave your emotions out of it. That is the exact issue I am having with the majority of the information contained within this article - emotional and speculative.76.111.172.54 +And take note when you upload using that template it says music promo or screenshot of a video, maybe wiki should change that to avoid confusion +Remove the fucking block you tossers +how funny how funny +I always got the impression he was a real cunt of screen. Can anyone back this up? +" A Source of Vandalism ""Under the heading ""Life as a Child,"" [Gus Mueller] added the sentence ""But even as an embryo, John Quincy Adams could feel pain and was a Founding Father."" [Gus Mueller] was logged out at the time, but [his] IP address (68.237.191.33) was recorded. If you do a reverse lookup of that, you'll see it belongs to pool-68-237-191-33.pghk.east.verizon.net. ""pghk"" stands for ""Poughkeepsie-Kingston."""" Source: http://asecular.com/index.php?110704 Gus Mueller" +Recent changes Your recent changes have been reverted as they did not fit into the English Wikipedia. We don't have room in the beginning of the article to list the name of something in every language in the world. If another language has an article on the topic, that name will appear in the sidebar of the page as a link, however. +" I live there! Please, have a look to this article WP:RS and try to understand that ""I live there"" is NOT a ""reliable source"" since no one can verify it. " +" Although Waldemar Bonsels is well known for his racist and antisemtic writings, it looks like the Maya book isn't. At the End of the Maya story Bonsels copied from Kaiser Wilhelm II. 's ""Hunnenrede"" (27.07.1900)((sorry, it's German:) http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/tagung-zur-literatur-unsere-kleine-braune-biene-maja-1.1069120 ). This (alone) does not makes it national-socialist. The term ""militarist"" seems to be the right one. 111.67.106.113 " +Tone I've added the tone tag. The tone is too informal for an encyclopedia. Please also cite your sources. Thank you! +" ReverbNation is not a reliable source, and I don't see any ""charting"" thereunless it's the totally unclear ""Rank No.7"". The IP is probably the author, sure, but SPI doesn't link IPs to accounts, and at any rate it's nothing we can't handle. Why not try AfD? Not notable and purely promotional, as far as I'm concerned. And if trouble persists, the subject can be made to stop editing, as a promo-only account, if evidence warrants it. " +will know peace, freedom, liberty, equality, and Progress. +"::::Frankly speaking I don't understand the problems you have with the very term of Central Lithuania. The article on Southern Lithuania explains pretty well that there was a ""Southern"" part as well. Also, why move all but two censuses elsewhere? WHy not keep this list as it was intended to be? //tt " +Unjustified hypocritical blocking +very short and very clear slaves - to gas chambers. +"::I would say that the process of ""lumping"" and ""splitting"" is intimately connected to phylogenetics (not to cladistics) by the fact that reality is ambiguous, both in a momentary and in a historical perspective. This is actually the problem that cladists think is connected to the Linnean systematization, and try to solve with cladistics. However, cladistics does not solve the problem, but only transfers it into concepts, erroneously equalizing time with space. The problem (i.e., ambiguity) is actually the difference between reality and our comprehension of reality. This statement is extremely difficult to understand, although it is perfectly clear: the problem (i.e., ambiguity) is the difference between reality and our comprehension of reality. The problem to understand it may be due to that it is a difference, since a difference is unsolvable. This problem, that is, this fact, is consistently incorporated into concepts in a systematization of the Linnean kind (i.e., categories of categories). It means that the possibility for lumping and splitting is both necessary and unavoidable. An unambiguous conceptualization is simply impossible. The question whether this fact means that reality is ambiguous has to be answered with: yes. There is no way to escape this ambiguity. Mats Envall (presently at 83.254.20.53 ] " +Yes, I appreciate that you are trying, but please give it some time. Nomo hasn't even responded to your proposal and I think rasti has some good points about the few/some etc. I've just added another English language source which provides additional details which will probably help you guys figure out something appropriate. +" Importance I changed the importance to ""top."" The troll is one of the most-well known figures of Norse mythology, from America to Asia. " +That's minor enough for you to correct yourself. There's no need to ask for advice. Be bold! ) +2009 (UTC) - No, I do and i choose actually, half-truth and distorted claims are not going to pass easily by me, i am not a professional astrologer but i have enough knowledge about astrology to understand of what is truth and what is a lie and when someone tries to hide something showing only one side of the coin... 10:14, 9 February +" « שמועס » Dear friend please come to to see if we can use this channel as a place for Yiddish chats. This form should work at when you are using Firefox, Konqueror or Opera. Unfortunatelly if does not work yet in Internet Explorer.‎ Please search in at the seventh item in .‎ It is .‎ I assume that you agree to add such an item at to as soon as our friends m:n:en:user:bawolff ... have fixed the code. Please do not hesitate to write your comments in the comment section.‎ Please make proposals about translating of the text / help: Only Latin characters and Latin numbers are allowed as « Your Nickname: » . Exceptions are « tekhniker|avek » , « ales-viser » etc. Please add some explanations about accessing the channel « #kavehoyz » by using the page chatwikizine: One should select the channel « #kavehoyz » from the channel list, select a Nickname and hit enter. All other fields are optional.‎ Thanks in advance and Good luck! Best regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ " +This topic is extremely noteworthy and likely to be one of the major news items in 2010. +I think it was done only to keep it in line with the ABC and NBC tables. It is important to note that, considering all the other CBS O&Os; past and present have been purchases. I personally don't have a problem with keeping it. +" please observe these Wiki guidelines on the Pro se page In the Wiki model, an article which may currently be poorly written, poorly formatted, lack sufficient sources, or not be a comprehensive overview of the subject, can be improved and rewritten to fix its current flaws. That such an article is lacking in certain areas is a relatively minor problem, and such articles can still be of benefit to Wikipedia. In other words, the remedy for such an article is cleanup, not deletion."" ""But the purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information: the potential readership or subjective usefulness of each item does not have to be justified if the material is notable."" "" while some editors may dislike certain kinds of information, that alone isn't enough by itself for something to be deleted. This may be coupled with (or replaced by) the unexplained claim that they feel that the information is ""unencyclopedic"" (see #Just unencyclopedic, above). Such claims require an explanation of whichpolicy the content fails and and explanation of why that policy applies as the rationale for deletion. (See also #Pointing at policy.)"" ""Wikipedia editors are a pretty diverse group of individuals, and potentially, any subject or topic may be liked or disliked by some editor somewhere. However, personal preference is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article."" ""It is insufficient to simply assert that an article (or the subject of an article) is not appropriate for Wikipedia."" ""The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments"" and the same applies to all deletion debates. Any statement that just consists of ""Keep"" or ""Delete"" with a signature can easily be dismissed by the admin making the final decision, and changing ""Keep"" to ""Strong keep"" will not make it any more relevant. Try to present persuasive reasons in line with policy or consensus as to why the article/template/category/whatever should be kept/deleted, and try to make sure it is an argument based on the right reasons."" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions " +ps - i dont need new articles, as the articles cited dont add up to the article on wikipedia. there are many simple and obvious issues and problems with the way the thing is typed out. by all means meet me on the talk pages, and explain how 13/13 outlets had machida, but espn does not. explain how dana f white is a neutral or relevant authority on mma judging, or how davis had no significant offence, and machida blocked takedowns, when davis takedowns and gnp is scored and machidas tdd is not. these are facts, not opinion. if you want me to cite the unified rules, and dana white litany of bs- i will happily do so. thanks. 77.101.41.108 +Use the way back and you will see the site has not changed for 8 years. +It wasn't deleted,and i see that some articles may advertise as long as they want, some articles are deleted next day... +BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOU BOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUBOLLOCKS TO ALL OF YOUB +Do not threaten me you nazi!! You can't stop me. I hope you are going to be online all day, because I will be! And I will be monitoring this page. You can't block me, I am an admin. So have fun. Latuff is gay, plain and simple, his mom left his dad for a jew. I have reliable sources. +") Oh yeah? And what exactly qualifies you to pass judgment on this? Since you profess to be so knowledgeable on this issue you might want to tell us your real name so we can pass judgment on your credentials too. Because as it is I will take the ""no-name nonacademic therapist from Hawaii"" over some wikipedia admin. The real ""no name"" here is you, so act accordingly, and with appropriate respect for people who are at least published. 82.21.25.194 (talk" +It's time I've left a statement at User talk:Pastorwayne which involved your previous comments, and which you may be interested in. - +Brontee Because it is being used in an article where the smaller size fits it. However if you want to upload the larger one in a completely new upload (rather than over the smaller one) then no probs with that. Thanks! - +Ah, I didn't know that's what Rohricht was doing. Has anyone ever attempted to do a better job with all these crusade charters? Have I stumbled across a possible thesis topic? ) +" Bad writing re format ""Attempts to sync unsupported content to Apple TV will draw an error message from iTunes."" This doesn't make sense. " +Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. (talk) +" Shojo manga: 26 out of the top 50 Yo, folks in ICv2's most recent top 50 manga in US sales, shojo manga has 26 titles. They are from Viz, TokyoPop, and Del Rey. The top shojo manga is ""Fruits Basket,"" followed by ""Vampire Knight,"" ""Absolute Boyfriend,"" and ""Ouran High School Host Club."" Way to go, shojo manga! ""Shojo series shine; ICv2 top 50 manga properties."" ICv2 Guide, #57, September/October, 2008. pages 6, 8-9. " +Check the edit history. It's 50 pages, per the article that is reference #1. So there's apparently a page or two that haven't been made public. I uploaded a bunch of them to commons, and some of them were deleted including 1 that was not a duplicate, but it's since been restored. We're getting closer; in April, this article had only 38 entries.(t•c) +Horny Bastard What a horny bastard, he didnt even need a viagra +December 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +"They are progressive power metal buddy, when a site reviews an album they don't lost every genre, and by the way AMG lists kamelot as heavy/death/black metal so who cares what you found on some random webpage. The fact is they are progressive. As wiki states prog metal is ""Progressive metal is a genre of heavy metal music which shares traits with progressive rock including use of complex compositional structures, odd time signatures, and intricate instrumental playing. The high level of musical proficiency is often combined with a lyrical counterpart in the form of epic textual concepts, resulting in lengthy songs and concept albums. As a result of these factors, progressive metal is rarely heard on mainstream radio and video programs, much due to that the length of the songs are not suited for those medias."" Kamelot meets most of those requirements, to deny that they are prog is to deny them what they are. " +The only thing you are persistant at you ugly bastard is fucking the TROLL +" Agreed, but it was necessary, at least from my part. I'm pretty sure that using an edit for this sole purpose, ""(Removing the commented ""DON'T CHANGE THIS!"")"", pretty much shows GSK's personality. I think we all should learn from each other and act mature since Wikipedia editing is not a joke, it's something serious. " +" Agreed. And this is over 6 years later...that is sort of a problem. '''''' (Chat • Count) " +(cur) (last) 01:44, 12 January 2007 Cindery (Talk | contribs) (→External links - add full-length link from Pagodaonlinethe other link was 14 seconds (fair use)) (cur) (last) 08:29, 12 January 2007 Spartaz (Talk | contribs) (→External links - If you are going to use fairuse to justify the inclusion of a YT video that is marked as being from anotehr website, can you do so on the talk page before adding the video?) I think you misunderstoodthe first link was a 14 second cut. I replaced it with the full-length link from the official site. JSmith, I don't think it's redundant, because in this casealthough the official site,Pagodaonline.comis also an EL, it is not noted that the drumming link is there. It's fine to have a separate EL for the drumming link which calls attention to it, per due weight: drumming in the subway was particularly notable in the subject's life, per citations. This would be a case in which I would support the use of a YT video as a reference (its original location) but put it in EL to avoid controversy. Editors of this article might disagreeand I think they should feel free to do that.- +For further reading check out this page, near the bottom, as well as the old AFDs and DRVs linked at the top of this page. - +==Salsb and pseudoscience?== Hello, I ended up here from Related Changes through the Aetherometry article. I noticed Salsb did a sneaky recat - to psuedoscience (sic). I don't want to start another revert war over that category, but really no-one seemed to think that it was appropriate for six months, so if no-one else does it in due time, I'll revert that change. The Pseudoscience category is unfortunately being used as a cudgel by some editors on Wikipedia, Salsb among them. +Youth Developmental Enterprises Dude, you deleted the page 2 minutes after I created it. Get real!! +" Well, there you go! LOL I guess I should stick with trusting my intuition. Mancini's Lasagne invite to Harry Talk " +That's completely up to the consensus of the editors working the article...the images are free so we can do what we want with them. Talk +User talk:24.63.62.169 I am glad you were able to take time away from fapping to jimbo porn to protect my talk page. Don't bother responding to this I won't read what you write. I don't read stuff written by faggots because I don't want to get aids. +"Also it's not about that, it's that other money making products tend not to have ""open-source"" written on them. " +Hey people! It's so so great to have A wiki page for Sylvia Ratonel! (: haha, I think you people should be looking forward for the CLEO magazine this Mid-February right? Haaha, I'm looking forward to it too! Hope it'll come out ASAP!! Regards, Rachel!! +YouTube There is a really superb interview with Louise Richardson over on YouTube- 'Conversations With History - Louise Richardson'. The interviewer is Harry Kreisler. She's very impressive, speaking much about her Irish upbringing and how it has shaped her work. She speaks of her anger on Bloody Sunday, her love of the Irish language, and the huge differences between the cultural world she entered in Trinity College, Dublin and her rural community in Waterford. 86.42.71.111 +. J Delanoys house is going to be fire bombed!! +The International Jew The Worlds Foremost Problem is absolutely 100% an open source, un-copyrighted book because of its profound notoriety. This book is de facto open source, un-copyrightable, fair use, free distribution as over 100 million people in the last century have read this book because the #1 super genius who pioneered a revolution sponsored this book. Does anyone else see what is going on here in Wikipedia? Is there anyone out there who is disgusted by this concerted effort of censorship? Does anyone see a pattern here regarding certain topics and censorship? Just Curious! I ask for those of you out there who believe in freedom of speech to allow this URL http://www.solargeneral.com/pdf/TheInternationalJew.pdf The International Jew What do i have to do to bring arbitration to have this link added to this article without being deleted again ever? Am I wasting my time? is there a cabal here or is this just the bloody tooth and nail struggle to get additions on wikipedia? Someone please shine down on me with some illumination ;p +DYK question Hi Casliber! I noticed that you removed my DYK suggestion with the explanation 'database locked'. Was this an accident? If not, where was the content 'moved' to? I am not entirely familiar with the details of the DYK process, but it seems strange because the hook was verified. Cheers, (Talk) +Lana/Hornswoggle/Torito One would not be incorrect to label Lana, Hornswoggle, and El Torito as wrestlers. Lana is obviously in a feud with Summer Rae (as an offshoot of the Ziggler-Rusev feud), she has brawled with Summer, and it's apparent that it's leading to a match between the two (either one-on-one, or a mixed tag with their respective fellas). And the women should be given more leeway regarding this issue compared to the men anyway, as they don't wrestle nearly as many matches as the guys do (1 diva match - MAYBE 2 if they're lucky - per card) Lana is no longer just a wall flower who stays on the outside. And Torito and Horny have wrestled a ton of times. Granted mostly as comedy acts and not serious competitors, but they've wrestled plenty, and are not merely sidekicks. (talk) +" I've been watching this for a few days with a mixture of disgust and derision. Alex (and whoever else writing that Christian Science is ""anti-Science"" or ""pseudoscience"" in toto) is deeply ignorant, and the current articles general approach to the faith is, well, deeply misleading and uninformed either by any great knowledge of Eddy's writing or of the rather large academic literature looking at the faith. At any rate, my colleague Pete Spotts is a top-notch science writer (and a good guy). Below is his little biography from our website. Think on it: ""Pete Spotts joined the Monitor in September 1976 after a two-year stint at the Miami Herald. Prior to mixing pens with test tubes as a science reporter, Spotts served as Midwest correspondent, staff editor in National News, special-projects editor, National News editor, and chief editorial writer. In 1987, Spotts shared an award with three Monitor colleagues for a series on the future of nuclear energy following the 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl. In 2003, he received an American Association for the Advancement of Science's Science Journalism Award. He was awarded a Knight Science Journalism Fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the 1999-2000 academic year and also received a two-week fellowship at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Spotts is a graduate of the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Fla. In his spare time, Spotts enjoys hiking, camping, photography, ham radio, and amateur astronomy.""" +" Still no answer? ☘☘ craic " +" ""There are no periodic trends"" This section/sentence is a bit wrong headed. Periodic trends are those which repeat from period to period (e.g. noble gas behavior recurring). What this really means to talk about is ""horizontal trends"" across the period. What the article means to say, I guess, is that horizontal trends are due to a quantum shell filling, and since 1s fills within 2 electrons, there's not much scope to look at 'trends'. It's also perhaps worth noting that when Mendelev put the ""periodic"" table together, he didn't know the noble gases existed, so all he had to place from what would become period 1 was hydrogen. " +"-valign=top | -18 June|| Straits Chinese Recreation Club Championshipshttp://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19311219.2.67.aspx Singapore, Straits Settlements|| Chua Choon Leong || John Lim6-4, 6-8, 4-0 ret.|| bgcolor=#ededed colspan=4| |" +aticle has to be in english +You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome. If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here Please put all discussion here. +" You don't understand the NOR policy if you think this is an example of it. I thought you asked Slrubenstein's opinion. Two of the editors who have an excellent understanding of what OR is are Slrubenstein and Jayjg. Ask one or both to comment here. As for the ArbCom, they do not do content disputes, and they don't do disputes in general that haven't been through some prior form of dispute resolution. Can you please answer the question I've asked several times. What concessions or compromises have you made in this dispute? (talk) " +I didn't want it to be read at the time. I didn't say anything about right now. I just wanted to create a page but she had to be mean and say my sources aren't notable when they are more notable than most sources on this site. That blog is more useful for an encyclopedia than any thing that is on this site. +Capitalization For the Legendary Cooking Utensils or Dark Cooking Society, I wonder, are they really titles or more like descriptors? In the latter case I think it would be lowercase. After all, the Japanese and Chinese this is based on do not use capitals I think, and neither are actual official names or entities. Anime sequel? The anime left off with many of the utensils not found, the masked member of the dark society not met (yet he was in one of the opening sequences and in Fei's flashback in the last episode), nor the leader confronted, so it seems like they left it open for continuation but didn't? Did the manga conclude the story? +the article is way too big for an album the has been a complete flop +" I have neither email addresses. I don't know if this would work, but I note that the sender's email address is included in the ""From"" line; so, technically, if you sent a message I could just ""RE"" it back with the files. Ruhrfisch is welcome to be the sender as well, if he's interested in reading them, and forward them on. ​​​​​​​​ ​​Don't give up the ship " +Truth Can you please explain why you think stating the truth (an ex wife may not want to be included as mother to the other 3 children born out of same marriage to a 'prostitute') which I was careful not to put. People in NZ are aware that Mr Mendoza fathered some of these children to a massage parlour employee as it was well publicised when the children were removed from her care. The other 2 children from the ex wife also may not want to be bunched together with the others either. +Ahh, I see. apparently has special privileges and can repeatedly vandalize articles by posting ignorant lies, non-credible sources and original research. I'll bet he feels special. +hey why should i assume good faith when hes being a dick +Hey, the page exists at VJM Media Group. There is an ongoing AFD (Articles for Deletion) debate on the page, so you might want to take part in that. Hope this helps ) +GO SUCK A DICK YOU BITCH, YOU CANT SOTP ME CUNT BAG +Entries Do american pro wrestlers and bands count as faous people? +I assume you are aware that . +bitches be like thanks. +" Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Black triangle (UFO). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Qwertyus " +Something must be done! +(because they are already mentioned/linked close to their images) +i was a homosexual, and i loved to jack off. +OK, if no one wants to discuss this, I shall restore the article. +not quite: it's 'lvy jw plgue bg no mttr'. +You can get to level 100+... +Please provide sources In your article on Henry Gabriel, could you please add sources for the statements in the article, as well as his exact date of birth? +Inappropriate pages Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. +" to buffalo, and change all instances of ""tease""" +Before you make any similar articles, please insert you add sources to assert notability this time. See WP:N for more info. +No, that's exactly what you are doing, taking us in another circle. I think the next step is to start adding material, sources and citing policy as it's being done to make sure there are no violations. I am well aware of my limits and boundaries as an editor and I hope others are as well. It looks like this will be a bumpy ride for any who take on the challenge of NPOV'ing this article. +-ique, -ic, -y, -ie... Spellings which are now considered archaic -ique (poetique, musique, logique...) a replaced almost anywhere with -ic (poetic, music, logic...) but retain in some falls (unique, critique, relique, antique, technique...), should also be included. Same fall is with spellings -y (allegory, memory, melancholy...) to -ie or -ia (allegorie, memorie, melacholie...), and silent e (poete, mythe, sexe...) instead of more common spellings (poet, myth, sex...). +" I did what I could. 99% of my problem with EGGs is that I could not find one simple article (or article section) that described old volcano areas in general. Each area like this seems to have its own description and the only specific area that I needed for the article was Mount Etna it is all about places that resemble those regions growing conditions. Short of writing that article as well (which would be interesting but I have been trying to tackle Senecio and the article about the alkaloids (which can and should be greatly improved)). I would rather keep spitting out new species pages and I am also looking for information for an article about Paul Klee's Senecio (painting) which are all related to the article about the alkaloids. Even the geology and soil science pages that I looked at don't have general information which is specific to these regions. All I know is that they probably all grow potatoes, but I don't know why and don't want to until this alkaloid mess is settled which I am almost euphoric to write! I found a paper that I had been citing a citation of a citation to in the mid-nineties (in the middle of hauling volumes of plated food out to families and truckers). It is that kind of euphoria, one of the closure of a large ""I read somewhere that they read somewhere that a paper was written that cited a paper and what they really said was...."" open-end from previous studies. Can I blame it on the soil scientists? " +Instead of doing that review my unblock request sincerely and honest, that's all I' m asking for and then give me a chance. You all are denying me the opportunity to prove myself . +"Third party jumping into the fray: I disagree with John F. Lewis regarding his reasons for rejecting the AFC, but not with the outcome. The article has plenty of references, some of which may well be reliable. The fact that the references are not properly cited in the article is problematic, but it is a widespread problem throughout Wikipedia and hardly sufficient reason to reject an AFC submission. I have discussed this article at length with Itzcoatzin on his talk page and will reiterate my views here. This article is not appropriate for Wikipedia because it is unfocused and overly broad. It does not present a clear narrative of the progress of a family through history, but rather presents a scatter-shot of ideas, many of which are irrelevant to the Zambrano family history. One may refer to the discussion at Itzcoatzin's talk page for a fuller understanding of the issues that have been discussed. John, I have noted that you are a relatively recent editor, and that you have concentrated your efforts on AFC reviews, largely rejecting them for lack of reliable sources, even when sources are given. While inline citations are certainly preferred, they are not a requirement of a start-class article. Rejecting articles on this basis, even when sources are given (perhaps as uncited links, or as external links) may be sending the wrong message to new users. ChatMe!ReadMe!! " +" Proposed change to lede The current lede states that "" Thermal expansion, which is well-quantified, is currently the primary contributor to sea level rise and is expected to be the primary contributor over the course of the next century."" However, while thermal expansion is expected to contribute more than half the increase in the coming century, it isn't the primary contributor currently. From AR4 page 409, ""Thermal expansion is projected to contribute more than half of the average rise,..."" but ""During recent years (1993–2003), for which the observing system is much better, thermal expansion and melting of land ice each account for about half of the observed sea level rise,"" I propose the following replacement sentence: At the end of the 20th century, thermal expansion and melting of land ice contributed roughly equally to sea level rise, while thermal expansion is expected to contribute more than half the rise in the upcoming century. I also intent to remove the subsequent sentence, ""Glacial contributions to sea-level rise are less important, and are more difficult to predict and quantify"" as it is no longer needed. Current footnote 8 doesn't support the claim, or at least I couldn't find it as it is the AR4 chapter on Climate models, not the chapter on Sea Level. I will add the reference to the Sea Level chapter Any objections?T " +And remember that Wikipedia:Help desk is there to help. +It seems this person has a problem with the idea of blacks having self-determination. And this person does not have a clue about race and ethnicity +Would you like to vote in that case. If yes, please vote here. Thanks. +i didnt think you would have a response for that +The problem with History of New South Wales is that for the first 50 years or so it's identical to History of Australia. +beating your wife lately...whats up with that +" Lee Listen, I've been dealing with this issue for a long time (several months) and to be honest with you, I'm sick and tired of it. Lee was a pitiful storm that stayed out at sea. All the info that needs to be said about it can more than easily be said in the main article. I can't tell you how many times I've said that but these pro-article wackos will demand an article for every little disturbance that forms until their dying breath. This WikiProject has laid down the criteria for article creation. Lee falls far short of that. And Epsilon is a longer, better written and more interesting article. §HurricaneE§Damagesarchive " +" How is it now? (Contact me) " +" I've now replied to your various comments above. Most are simple ""dones"" but there are one or two queries. I've just noticed that we've recently developed a lot of overlinks. expanded the lead and in doing so created a whole new set of links. Some people like to see things linked in both the lead and the body but I've never been keen on it; it just seems like more clutter to me, and is definitely so in the edit view. Which would you prefer? - " +" Etymology The etymology section was completely wrong. The Hebrew consonant ""Tsade"" results from the merging of (at least) two proto-Semitic consonants. They are still distinct in Classical Arabic, as ""Ṣad"" and ""Ḍad"". It is easy to see that ""chamets"" corresponds to the Arabic root ḥ-m-ḍ, because the Aramaic version (which appears in the Aramaic parts of the Hagada) is ḥamiʕa (with `Ayin), and almost all Arabic ""Ḍads"" map to `Ayin in Aramaic. In Hebrew, the root means both ""sour"" and ""leavened"" (cf. ""chamuts"" =sour; ""chomets"" =vinegar; ""chumtza"" =acid). In Arabic it is used mostly to denote ""sour"" or ""acidic"". In any event, ""chamets"" is not related to ""hummus"" or ""Homs"". ""Hummus"" is ""chimtza"" in Modern Hebrew, and in one case, ""chometz"" in the Bible might be ""hummus"" rather than vinegar, but the root is historically different, and only accidentally did they assume the same phonetic shape. 79.177.167.209 " +This IP address is dynamically allocated by an internet service provider, and provides internet connections to an internet cafe via network address translation. The offending user has been banned from computer usage. A removal of the block would be much appreciated. +Yes, the form is very 'modern', at least the way this guy is translating them (Daniel Ladinksy). Great stuff. - +A tag has been placed on Shame-free Since 1982, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Shame-free Since 1982. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. +I stopped vandalising...but i got blocked anyway. +Answered on my talk page (where you cross-posted this). +Bearcat Stadium Thanks John for your kind comments. I was very surprised to see a Division II stadium get that kind of notice. But stemming from that you might be interested in an article I just posted List of presidents of the American Football Coaches Association. It should probably go in the wiki project also. Thanks again! +Jinxmchue Apparently, I screwed up when I asked if he plans to constructively edit any pages after his block expires. He's now editing at User talk:67.135.49.211, making the same complaints as usual. I placed a rangeblock on 67.135.48.0/23, which went over like a lead balloon (see WP:AN/I#Jinxmchue IP rangeblock). There's some discussion there and some questions about why he was blocked in the first place. I removed the rangeblock and the protections I put on the talk pages earlier, but there's an unblock request at User talk:67.135.49.177. I don't know if you want to provide some explanation, but I figured you might want to at least know about it. It looks like I've caused the interpersonal fiasco that I knew I'd cause right after Christmas. Good going on my part. (Elkspeak) +Rename username in de Is done! +" New category I've noticed that you are interested in the ""people by former religion"" topic -> Category:Jews who have renounced Judaism. So, if you'd like to tag some articles with this category go right ahead. " +" It is blocked; if you could just remove the messages from the other editors - or just blank the page and save it. Thanks. •talk• " +" ""Russian scare"" in Pacific if late 1800s Hi there, you might be interested in creating this article. In the 1880s & 1890s Australian colonies & New Zealand armed themselves against what what later called the ""Russian scares"" fears of Russia controlling their sealanes and even invading. My personal theory is that this fear was built up by British arms suppliers rather than any political facts, but you seem in a position to write a balanced article if you're interested - we don't hear much from the Russian point of view on this. regards. Rod " +I will castrate you and roast your testicles. Then I will feed them to you. +You're a racist You revert my edits to disparage Australian heritage. If you do that again I will get the Federal Police on to your door! 58.179.207.194 Aussie Pride! +Translated The article sounds as though it has been translated from French or the like. It is not worth the effort of improving it. I have made a slight improvement, however. +Using that logic (ordering them as on ABC Medianet), one could make just as strong an argument that the cast should be listed in the order of their cast bios here on the offical ABC Grey's Anatomy page. That would put James Pickens Jr. ahead of everyone except Ellen Pompeo and Patrick Dempsey. One could also argue that they should be listed based on what they're paid, since those figures were recently reported, in which case Isaiah Washington and Katherine Heigl could well wind up on the bottom of the list. I really think that listing them in billing orderthe traditional method, as pointed out by the above responsemakes the most sense. I won't revert it yet, hopefully some other people will add their opinions, so we can establish a better consensus? +This page is fucked up can someone please fix it ? +And what is meant by indefinite? Forever? Until further notice? What? +During his televisived debate with Vice President Walter Mondale in 2002, Mondale bashed Coleman for his abortion position. Norm Coleman retorted, and included that he and his wife personally knew the tragedy that comes with the death of children, as he and his wife lost two children through miscarriage. The transcripts of the debate are readily availible on any number of websites. Please look it up and alter the page back to what I had before you so carelessly altered it. Your remark about Freemasonry was a really careless thing to add. I think now that you realize there is absolutely no credible source on that, you made the right decision by deleting it. +" Okie Dokie, just wanted to make sure those didn't get missed. I am feelin' like editing again after that massive 2 year project I did a couple years back, so I might knock out some of those articles on the list either tonight or early tomorrow (depending on when I get done watching the shows on my DVR). ) - • Talk • " +Hey Extremeguy they think I'm not Jim Conroy do something I tried everything. +I figured out the issue. Apparently, some time in May 2011, the last three episodes were leaked far ahead of the planned date. This caused all manner of hell for the writers. Cartoon Network was really angry about their early release. That release was what enabled sites like mastertoons.com to obtain these videos far ahead of the planned air date. +Paul Malmont Hello Dionwr! Good work on your article Paul Malmont - it is well written and contains a healthy ammount of internal links, plus the external links help with verifying the information presented. I'll see if I can work on expanding the article a little and perhaps try to incorporate the external links you provided as inline citations. Anyhow, thank you for your contributions and I hope you decide to stick around! Please leave a note at my talk page if there is anything I can help you with. +" No hard feelings, I've been eating and breathing airplanes for the last few weeks, and will be doing so for the next few weeks too. I'm looking here regularly, I'm just not editing. (?!? - cool stuff) " +" English ""I don't think it can be fixed by the Community"" - Boing I think it can't be fixed by the community Yep, I learnt that about three months ago....I know...tell me about it..it IS a funny language." +Company. Looks like 'problem solved'. +" More clean up and questions I think the first paragraph in early childhood needs a bit of a rewrite. I propose ""Muhammad was born about the year 570[8] and his birthday is believed to be in the month of Rabi' al-awwal.[44] He belonged to the Banu Hashim clan, part of the Quraysh tribe, and was one of Mecca's prominent families; although it appears the clan was less prosperous during Muhammad's early lifetime.[14][45] Tradition places the year of Muhammad's birth as corresponding with the Year of the Elephant, which is named after the failed destruction of Mecca by the Aksumite king Abraha who supplemented his army with elephants. Alternatively some 20th century scholars have suggested different years, such as 568 or 569.[47]"". Thoughts? " +Manuel Rivera-Ortiz Does anyone else think that the sole contemporary documentary photographer focus on Manuel Rivera-Ortiz screams of self-promotion? His work isn't nearly as notable as it's made out to be. 222.154.232.126 +British? Exactly how is she American-British? There is part of chapter in the section 'Personal life': In 1990, Khan emigrated to the United Kingdom where she had a steady relationship. She splits her time between Los Angeles, Germany and London but has been living mainly in London since 2006. Start would mean that she went to live in UK 1990, but then is said that she's only been 'living mainly' there since 2006. And what is this Germany thing? Shouldn't it then be American-British-German? What is the source for this? Can't see any. 82.141.119.195 +Citations Now that considerable and excellent work has been done by Linmhall and others to add references and citations to the article, I think that the can be removed. Any objections? +" No sweat. I'll tab it and ping you tomorrow if you're still asleep come sundown. ) " +WP:RM Why are you removing my voiced support for the page protection for List of Washington State Routes? t c +The article Rumorz has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +" GAIA observation limit I used a source that gives the named brightness limit directly and I used ""may"" because the GAIA team has apparently weighed options to read out the CCD differently to get to bright stars and obtain better estimates than Hipparcos, presumably. " +It is an improvement so I won't comment on the discreet tweaks a user made in his/her arguments in order to fake logical consistency and avoid blame or cite anything that would smear a user's strained wikilike appearance. Excuse me if I don't seem to remember the same thing, and I won't comment on your bringing up this dead issue just like Scieberking did on my talk page. Some would call that harassment. Oh well. +===>It's impossible to say I don't know why something doesn't occur, in fact, it is virtually impossible to prove or conclude anything from a lack of information. -, talk +REDIRECT Talk:Ruth Lyons: First Lady of Television +" ""the nation of domination"" AND (""World Wrestling Federation"" OR WWF) gets to ""Page 13 of about 125 results"" ""nation of domination"" AND (""World Wrestling Federation"" OR WWF) gets to ""Page 18 of 176 results"" My only opinion would be that a "".. (WWF)"" or similar suffix would assist navigation and recognition. Kaye " +Okay, that makes sense, but doesn't it go against the original way Fischer wanted to modify Chess960? In original Chess, I have the option to either castle king-side or queen-side when there are only Rooks and King on the back rank. But now, if I have this start position of 946 or 947, I have to move a rook. Are there official rules out there by FIDE or USCF that explain what to do here? If we are to be faithful to the original Chess setup, then castling must be allowed either way I would think. Instead, we now have to move a rook away in order to castle queen-side, and it's only for roughly 2 (maybe more?) initial setups. I think what you said should be explained in a new subsection of the castling rules. Like, in original chess, I have people argue about En Passant, and I have an official place I can point to and tell them that En Passant is a real move. Now if 946 or 947 arise, they may either try to do a null move, or they may force me to move a rook (if a null move is allowed). This seems like either a flaw or something that should be outlined in the rules specifically. If it is the case where the rook must move first, then I think a new subsection should be added to explain this. ) +==Abuse== And you Saxifrage would do well to explain why my msg is incivil and the one it is a comment to is not. I have removed your comment as I beleive yours is far more incivil than mine. +" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Here are some other hints and tips: I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.) When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. '' " +The first websites were by the military to relay signals and information to each other, once technology advanced they stopped it and the internet as we know it today was bordn. +That's Right That's right you leave my changes in that article. +1) Please explain what specifically is Business Wire and MPD´s direct conflict of interest. 2) Please explain what specifically makes BW an unreliable source. What is BW´s direct conflict of interest? They are simply a business wire/ business news source just like many other ones. Please be specific. Simply telling me to read WP policies is not specific: be specific please. +" Reopening the genre debate Although this issue is definitely more than a little worn out, but I recently noticed that Lil B's official Facebook page lists his genre as ""based"". Isn't that more than enough to warrant a change to the article that would also include ""based"" as a way to describe the music of Lil B? _friend " +" You are a bit of an idiot, aren´t you? As per you: ""Delete recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, inflation"" Please indicate where the term Inflation myths appear on the Inflation target. Idiot!! " +My God, ask check-users before blocking. It is not me! Is this you treat editors here? +" Seems that Dafydd's problem is that Welsh nationality ""doesn't exist, verifiabily"" (see latest authoritative statement at Talk:Newport). So all those people in Wales and elsewhere, now and for the last 1500 years or so, who thought their nationality was Welsh are mistaken. Oh well, fair enough guv, if you say so (Dim!). On another note, have you any input to add to this discussion - Counties of Wales and other cans of worms? It seems to have touched at least one raw nerve. Hwyl, " +Your a disgrace Dan stop making up silly stuff about the wombats +robotoid I'm doing research for robotoid and am trying to track down the word's origin. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. - +truly a “Tyranny of the Ignorant”. +Whatever you say, person, but I'm not sure whether admins are allowed to take action when they themselves are involved in a dispute. +i dont give a fuck nigga +Bug report from Uncyclopedia Hya, since the last Wikiupdate, the popups.js doesn't work for us. All popups direct to the index.php article. Anyone can help? Thanks. Mordillo +hi there ''''''''''i've been accused of vandalising pages that i've never looked at before. What's going on!!??'''''''''' +Looks like you tried editing Shion's page and say she's a girl. Idiot. Read her storyline next time! +What is really funny Search at his username on the Google web. He even makes up stories. What a douche he is. Yes you need a new hobby. fella hella. +"::Sorry Lo, didn't spot this what with being banned by a selection of Anglo-American editors for annoying them. ""Every other contributor whether British or Irish, can grasp this fact and accepts it."" 'They most certainly do NOT!!! Can't you read?? They merely get fed up arguing or back-off at the threat of being censored (aka blocked)! What we need is more editors who will neither tire nor be intimidated. ( ) " +" say thanks for responding. i just noticed your frustration at the CFT page (i have spent very little time there since a month ago) with BobK (i argued a little with him on DFT, but have, for the time being, chosen not to continue to slug things out). i think that we EEs need to get together, decide on some changes we think we can get away with, make the changes (and article creations) and then slug it out when ""the opposition"" wants to revert. at least we'll have a foot in the door. " +calm down Seriously, man, you are beginning to scare me. What's with all the high drama and blustering? An ANI report? Why? What for? Perhaps you should take a healthy dose of WP:MASTADONS and consider taking a break. Seriously. +It would seem that the page is locked only when William Connolly and Kim Dablestein comments are added and their edits incorporated. Just an observation on an inconvenient truth. ~ +don't fuck with Meno25! You're a retarded twat, virgin in every cool thing and soon to be banned from the English Wikipedia. +" It's a big step from saying the volume number is incorrect to saying that the paper doesn't exist at all (& Stho002 professes that he has seen a copy, which would seem to argue for its existence). I'm also concerned that you're repeating the earlier error of original research, as I stated before. It is your opinion that the names are erroneous; you have not got that information from a reliable source. I know it seems ridiculous, but we simply can't impose our own opinions, particularly when we have so few sources to go on. We know the 2010 catalogue to be out of date, so we turn to WoRMS as the only up-to-date source available, and it's normally pretty reliable. The current text states ""the volume number and year of the article cited do not match"", and cites this page (presumably intending this page), but neither page states that ""the volume number and year of the article cited do not match"". This is original research on your part, and cannot stand. " +I have read the books, which did nothing to convince me of the author's point of view, but that is not the reason for removing the paragraphs. The reason was, as stated above, that the removed paragraphs violated Wikipedia standards. If you wish to provide a link to the books so that readers can access them, that is fine. However, it is not fine to have material that is original research, nor is it fine to have material that includes ad hominem attacks. This is an encyclopedia that has particular ways of doing things. If you wish to draw attention to Scott's work, why not establish your own web pages about it? You could do a Wiki entry about Scott himself, but remember that Wiki entries need to be neutral and factual, rather than polemical and expressing opinion. +" Support. This is the full RM case i made at 5S and was about to make here so ill paste it below as this explains my support. Its clear looking at reliable sources and by reliable i mean non tech blogs that these reliable sources use the capital. rather than lower case. See all of the following Independent,The Telegraph, The Scotsman, SKY, BBC, Guardian, Daily Record, The Sun, Daily Mirror, The Metro, Evening Standard, Daily Mail, Daily Express, Financial Times, The Times, Daily Star, Herald, Ev Telegraph NY TImes, CNN, New York Daily, Chigago Tribune, USA Today, Fox News, Time, ABC. In addition the precedent set with previous versions of the iphone all use the capital as well. See IPhone 3G IPhone 3GS, IPhone 4S. We need to look at reliable sources not simply tech blogs which are never considered reliable or notable. Scot " +wikipedia admins clearly abuse their power by changing articles as they wish. it should be changed or boycott the wikipedia. +":::The rude bastard ignored my private email to them as well. In it, I pointed out that since I was unable to defend myself against some horrible little troll called who told me to go fuck myself in an edit summary and was grave dancing, perhaps they would be so kind to block them seeing as they were been incivil to me, like I was apparently to Caden. But no it appears that Future Perfect Sunrise has double fucking standards. It wouldn't be the first time in admin has displayed such disgusting double standards, and I'm sure it's not going to be the last. Future's Perfect Sunrise, it appears, is not so fucking perfect after all, and is instead a filthy overcast skyline full of hypocrisy and double standards. talk " +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Chowder (TV series), you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +" Let's pop like hip hop and get me learning! (Report findings) (Past espionage) " +===NOTE the Alex Kramer article has already has 2 FAILED NOMINATIONS FOR DELETION, get the idea??? She is known to MILLIONS via TV quiz programs! +I have a Ph.D so I think I am better than everyone else! A large black man came in my eye but thats not a big deal now because I can now focus on my gay midget porn just like I use +" k, just wanted to make sure we weren't delving into original-research territory. =) Thanks! (talk) (e-mail) " +The Arsenal Section has been re-vamped. Check it out to see how each Morpher works. +Article table; Jan 26 update This table automatically updated itself; see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Ireland articles by quality log for details of the latest changes. Current and past versions of this table (July 2007-present) are stored at ''' +" qaradawi Referenced with footnote 31 it is stated, that a ""scholar in Egypt"" has spoken against al-Baghdadi. This is wrong, because al-Qaradawi (although he is an Egyptian) lives in Qatar, because the Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed in Egypt. 137.44.1.153 " +Robert Wadlow Source was already provided in link, no need to edit the image. +I added some reviews but they won't show up, what's wrong? +" Hudson On The Moscow I watched it about a year ago and have since forgotten the saxophone piece that Robin Williams practices all the time. It was kind of the ""defining"" song, if you will. Or, who the artist of the song? Or, you know, both. " +VIRGIN ALERT VIRGIN ALERT get ur ass off being a vandal fighter u fucking no life virgin +" Douchebag It appears you have a fan of your work. Have you requested a checkuser to find any other user names that are yet to be seen? yada yada " +between the two former realms +thank you ) Thank you Thingy for the (loud) welcome! I'm new on the site. +October 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pupusa, you will be blocked from editing. - +Can't believe I didn't notice this. Thanks. +"Harald88, I have added at the end of ""Single source problem"" a comment which actually should have appeared at the end of ""What was known about Voigt"". Could you move the comment, please? " +Invitation Hi Meg1977, Thanks for helping with Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. Here's an invitation to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. There, you can meet other Wikipedians working on articles related to Japan. You'll find lists of new articles, projects, and links to resources such as Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles), with decisions the community has made about how to format articles Template:Newest Japan-related articles, where you can list the articles you create so the community can see them Portal:Japan, a collection of resources on Japan You'll also learn about , a template you can place on the talk page of any relevant article, and find instructions for assessing articles. Hope to see you there! Best regards, +Giving the brothers their own pages When Twin Falls Idaho came out, I understand having them simply be The Polish Brothers. At this point though, it makes sense to split them. Their body of work is quite divergent, and I'm not understanding why they are still labeled as one entity. Thoughts? I'd love to change this up. +Thank you for experimenting with the page George Washington on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. |talk|popups +" Spare me the drama and amateur use of legal terminology that you clearly do not understand. The caption states ""Seventy per cent of [Israeli youth] surveyed reported increased subjective fear or hopelessness."" The photograph portrays an Israeli youth, and crouched with the toy gun, gets across the concept of the text. This isn't an anti-Arab Israeli commentary (if it wasn't I wouldn't have used Arab Israelis to portray Friendship). David '''''' " +" Well, it's really common knowledge that the PNA is the first truly independent government of the Palestinian people in many years I'm sure you know that. Secondly, I am (one of) Palestine's National Authority representatives here on Wikipedia and in my duties I am required to provide accurate information of our official standpoint - in this case that standpoint is ""that we are the first truly independent government by Palestinians, for Palestine " +Piccolo Mid Hey I think that there is going to be a Piccolo Mid because Piccolo Early has the Special Beam Cannon as his Ultimate Attack while Piccolo End has it as his Blast 2 attack. Also that Piccolo Mid is actually just a more powerful version of Piccolo fused with Nail and when he fought Frieza. It just want to let you know what I think. +" A bit belated — (talk) " +" removal of proper sources?? Why are the real and proven informations removed, and replaced with FAKE ones, with no sources attached to it what so ever? The info destroyers on the site even send me cretin attacks where they acuses me of ""not atach the proper source note/info""😉. Even if I carefully attach the reference notes (the same at other info on the same page, allready posted by others, real, accepted source notes), the info posted by me complete with note sources, is again removed complitely and replaced with cretin, fake, and totally unproven info, with no source note what so ever. What kind of site is this?? A new department of the Funny Farm? Or a place where history manipulators gathered to make up fantasy and totally unsubstantiated fairytales, removing any real info & historian which posts pertinent and proven info? In this case, I live you to your medicine. PS: Do not forget to cry ""attack to person!""😉 (or whatever you call it when you are caught with the hand in the cookie jar, and you look for an excuse) " +. I am a loser and I need your help to get a life +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Suck my cock bitches Request handled by: " +WHO IS THE BEST WAKEBOARDER MOTHERFUCKER +Such a friendly, helpful and encouraging person (82.132.222.241 ) +" Chip killed Ciji, but Val confessed because Gary was arrested and tried for the crime. bon giorno #c " +Your gut is correct, I am of the male persuasion. Thanks for the praise, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one who had ever noticed this phenomena. +" Existence ""This user does not believe in the existence of human races"" Really? what's the Marathon all about then? " +In fact even modern Ukr sources widely use it when in English: http://www.cossacks.kiev.ua/history.html . +WHAT THE HELL ARE HOPE STILL DOING IN THE COMPETITION?!?! It's so obvious that the public don't like them because they've been in the bottom two three times now. It doesn't matter how bloody good you are, if no-one likes you then no-one's gonna buy your singles! Beverly sounded a lot worse over the TV than what the judges were hearing — they loved her performance when it sounded terrible from where I was sitting. On a firmly positive note, Same Difference were seriously good tonight! I have finally been won-over by those two because they actually delivered a decent vocal performace rather than larked around with props on stage. Rhydian was so-so tonight in my opinion; he can do a lot better than that because his performance wasn't original. Niki as well lost it halfway through her song and it sounded rough. I'm starting to like Leon a lot now. He's a better jazz-singer than a pop singer, hopefully we won't have another Ray Quinn on our hands! I've got to say though, I loved the whole deadlock thing, it was so dramatic and the suspense was way better than the normal voting. +Just want to drop a note that we got off on the wrong foot here. I am sorry for mistaking your contribution to the wiki as inappropriate, as it appears to have some valid content. I have made a couple of minor improvements to the article and hope you'll stay and keep at it. Feel free to ask me some questions on my talk page and I can help out. Wikipedia is a great place to work and play. I have not been here very long, and I'm a big enough man to admit when I'm wrong. Please accept my humble apologies. +" If the ""administrator"" who abusively indefinitely protects this page is going to be allowed to present an inaccurate summary then blame it on someone else this is a waste of time. " +I'm serious clear this talk page, it's an embarrassment. and for you care so much about a stupid IP address user page. You should really question yourself. +Cool thanks for having a look. i don't disagree with you i just liked how it is now but it may be a better idea so i will just see how things go, as for the picking on the Townsville and Thuringowa page it just felt a bit that way, i know it will help get a higher rating but it just looks like a bit of an attack when editers ask for every line to have a ref and the ref at the end of that piece covers the whole bit....oh well i'll just let it go for now and try to do all that is asked, i think i only have the sport part to ref now. thanks again +James Bauer I notice it says James Bauer invented the coin changer mechanism in 1970. But google patents lists hundreds of patents going back to 1796. +" I'm trying to open a dialog here. Listen to what I have to say and I'll listen to you. Don't delete this. While we are in talks I won't do vandalize. -The Masked Flag of Freedom Keep the flagship on there and I'll stop the jihad on you. Keep removing it and you are just asking for this situation to get 200 times worse. You lock out this page from editing and I'm just going to move to other pages you guys love. You broiught this one on yourselves guys. Why you keep leaving North Texas and UH alone but are so militant to hurt Tech? Hrm........ Hey, lbbzman, what's the deal with you and saying ""Cheers"" anyways. You trying to pretend and be British or something? Trying to hide who you really are and instead take up the actions and behaviors of something you only wish you were? Maybe because you are ashamed of who you are? yeah, thought so. - - If you guys want to open a discussion I'm here and will listen and talk.. Or if you want to play hardball like the Israelis and Palestinians we can do that too. From this point on I wish to be refered to as ""The Masked Flag of Freedom"" and I will sign all my edits as such. My two demands are, leave the flagship alone on the tech page, and Lnnzman has got to drop the dumb fake british thing. CHEERS!!! -Masked Flag of Freedom." +Nordicism Took out the part which incinuates a correlation between Nazism and Nordicism. Please read chapter 11 of Mein Kampf. Nordic Aryan was used to describe the European segment of the Aryan race +"::::::::::Again, with the ad hominems? Someone should program an ""ad hominem generator"" to make it easier (something along the lines of the postmodernism generator). According to, er, Wikipedia: ""A straw man... is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position."" Do Confer, et al., suggest that critics misrepresent evolutionary psychology? They do. In the abstact: ""Some of the controversy stems... from misunderstandings about the logic of evolutionary psychology..."" And in the body of the paper: some critiques are based on ""...misunderstandings and mischaracterizations."" Straw man args. About as unimpressive as ad hominems... " +" A response to ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section'"" I inserted facts documenting instances of named sources accusing Catherine Glick of racism. I'd like to take a moment to address comments in the ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section.'"" Please do not misinterpret documentation of allegations of racism for allegations themselves. The section inserted, apparently subject to some controversy, is ""accusations of recism."" In that section, the accusations of racism that several writersEileen Read, Alex Pareene, and Paul J. Balleshave leveled at Caroline Glick are documented. Properly, no opinion or point of view has been expressed in the ""Allegations of racism"" section as to the veracity of these allegations. 1. I therefore cannot understand why documenting such allegations could be considered controversial, let alone ""potentially libelous"" as you say. The documentation of specific allegations of racism by named sources need only prove that such allegations exist, not their veracity. Documentation of written defenses of Ms. Glick's work are solicited and in fact highly encouraged. 2. I apologize for linking to www.youtube.com. The link I should have used was the one from Ms. Glick's homepage. That link is at: http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2010/06/we-con-the-world-the-gaza-fl.php 3. I never claimed to be other than a single user even though, incidentally, all of the contributions to the ""Allegations of racism"" section are not mine. Incidentally, if it matters, I for my part am a fan of Ms. Glick's work and do not believe that she is a racist. I contributed to the section to advance the Wikipedia mission to provide a forum where issues of public significance can be documented in a way as to provide reasoned information to the public. one of Ms. Glick's detractors, Eileen Read, wrote an article in the Huffington Post accusing Ms. Glick of racism and asking that she be fired. The article is making rounds all over the internet and has likely been read by hundreds of thousands, if not many more. It'd be a great shame from my perspective if Ms. Glick's career suffered as a result of such charges (since they are, in my own personal view, baseless)such charges should be documented neutrally and weighed against the writings of Ms. Glick and her defenders, aiming only to inform the public, which can then decide. When I inserted a reference arguing that Ms. Glick's positions are ""not racist"" but ""common sense,"" it was taken down by those same persons invoking BLP standards and undue weight. 69.110.8.85 " +ROOM MATE IS IMMATURE AND I WILL CREATE A ACCOUNT +" Ok, i'm more confused now. the DC ruling reads ""As of today, only fourteen states and the District of Columbia have established Exchanges. The federal government has established Exchanges in the remaining thirty-six states, in some cases with state assistance but in most cases not."" - If this is the case, how is Halbig an issue since its exchange is apparently under 1321? " +" ""In the eye test, the animal is observed for at least three days for signs of redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration, hemorrhaging, cloudiness and/or blindness in the eyes. After the test, the animals are killed."" I think we should have a source for this. " +" Request rejected - I understand that it was a mistake but i am sorry. We have to understand that ""Protection is not an endorsement of the current version"". Editors should not ask for a specific version of a page to be protected or, if it has already been protected, reverted to a different version. Instead, editors should attempt to resolve the dispute. Please refer to Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes for more details. To further explain my desicion i'd invite you to read this. You'd also find a label about the ""wrong version"" at the bottom of my userpage. Please try to communicate and resolve the dispute as i haven't seen any comment from anyone since the page was protected 2 days ago. - Wiki me up® " +Have you read WP:VANDALISM recently? I quote: Image vandalism - Uploading shock images, inappropriately placing explicit images on pages, or simply using any image in a way that is disruptive. +REDIRECT Talk:1913 Ais Gill rail accident +"By the way, what's a ""lede""? HA! " +Sounds good. I won't be around to edit until Sunday when I'll add any former Cardiff players that I have the relevant information for. Then perhaps work backwards game by game from the last match. What do you think the layout for still active players should be? Update their last cap when they win another or leave it blank while they are still active? +":::::It seems to me Roger has made it quite clear ... ""(content/is contents/are)"" ... so why are you insisting on ""content/are""? " +PLEASE, DO NOT ADD MORE UNCONFIRMED SERIES AND BLOCKS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANNOUNCED!!!1 Please, it's the fucking true, i hate the people that lies, and doing vandalism, i'm not doing vandalism, i say the fucking true, but you are an idiots, do not add more series and movies, that have not been anounced in latin america, they don't appears on ANMTV, for that reason, they will never air in Latin America, the following series that i montioned are: The High Fructose Adventures of Annoying Orange Secret Fort for Awesome The Problem Solverz DC Nation DC Nation Shorts Incredible Crew Please, it's the very true, sorry for bad words and expresions, but is the true, please, protect the article, greetings!!! +" Reference content check on Abkhazian Air Force I've discovered discrepancies between sources reporting on the air force inventory published 9 February 2007 by Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie and what was added to the article. The cited source, Segodnia.ru, differs from the article in that it reports ""7 вертолётов Ми-8, 3 вертолёта Ми-24"", not 1 each. Two English translations I've found both list 1 each, but identify the MiG-21 fighter incorrectly as ""MiG-23"" (a mistake not found in the Segodnia report), and specify the Mi-8 as a ""Mi-8T"". Do you have access to the original Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie source so the actual text can be checked? Thanks, (Talk) " +REDIRECT Talk:Danish National Cycle Routes +Sanford Ransdell Hello, I noticed that you added some tags on the Sandford Ransdell Talk page. Someone feels that the article should be deleted. I thought you might be interested in evaluating it and see if you concur. I began the article and may be slightly biased in my feelings that Sanford Ransdell is of some historical significance. Anyway, your imput one way or the other would be greatly appreciated. +Bottom line: it doesn't need a section longer than the rest of the article put together.... +" Though I'm not sure about the claim that transgender men are not ""real"" men (perhaps not biologically), I do find it somewhat strange that we're including unknown men on the basis of their being transgendered, and at the exclusion of some of the most influential and famous male figures in history (e.g. Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, Hitler, Caesar). What are the priorities here? To prove how liberal and progressive wikipedia is? " +2007 (UTC) It is a cloud I saw it in a trailer today on tv it showed the cloud. 02:52, 11 June +Beer? Hi Matthew, I'm in London July 25 to August 4. I think we should have our annual beer. Incidentally I'm in Finland at the moment attending DebConf5. The travel advice suggested a cheap way of getting to Helsinki is to fly to Estonia and take the short ferry trip across the water. But then I thought I'm probably on some Estonian customs black list. The prospect of a strip search by enthusiastic friends of he who does not want to be identified as an Estonian customs officer made me think again: I flew direct. Imagine: By Wikipedia rules if they missed the four opportunities (in and out, in and out) they could catch up with me 10 months later. Yes, I know, the logic escapes me too. +" Please try to remain cool during a dispute. See WP:CIVIL. Calling another user's edits ""pathetic"" is inappropriate, and will not be tolerated. 194.189.32.65 " +Possibly unfree Image:VNJ-3_PP2048.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:VNJ-3_PP2048.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Talk +J.J. Sagnella - I'm not sure what your hard on for my talk page is, but stop screwing with it. ^^ I don't see a personal attack in there...does anyone else? +I got it from the publishers website ) Yeah I'll keep an eye on it. It seems strange that they seem to know quite a bit about wikipedia policy but don't have an account? Maybe they're trying to cover their tracks for whatever reason... +Official Theory Is A Theory The official theory of 19 hijackers is a theory just like any. It has never been proven. +Anything west of Adana would be Western Anatolia, especially if it is a bi-sectional division (east and west). This is why it is not up to you to question reliable sources. +sable (marten) jacket - Kanadischer Goldzobel.jpg|250px]] +It's extremely confusing that you try feverishly to confuse the reader about the ethnicities of Persians Zora. Being Persians mean being one is Iranians period. Through out its history, the Persian Empire allowed everybody else to speak their language and keep their culture, Iranians themselves, however, were and are always referred to those born and raised in Persia or in the Iranian states like Khwarizm, Khorasan, Mazandaran and others that to this day remain either part of Iran, or in the case of Khwarizm that became part of Russia after they invaded Persia in 1878, and now is Uzbekistan, still speak Persian, are mostly made up of Persians and keep the Persian culture alive. All one needs to do is type the word Uzbekistan in any major encyclopedia. Thank you +" Episcopal High School Sorry about my addition. I recognize that the ""drug use"" section was unneeded, and I added that before I recieved your message. But the section TAB""Recently, the reign of Episcopal has begun a slight decline. The first sign of this was the new Episcopal code: ""Episcopal students do not lie, cheat, steal, or chew gum on campus."" This was taken to be a joke by many students, but alas, it was not. Additionally, several excellent teachers have left, and recently one of most notable faculty, Holocaust Historian John Iorii, has been asked not to renew his contract. These changes in the EHS experience began with the choice of former headmaster Charlie Zimmer to abdicate his title to Dale Regan. When asked about Ms. Regan, one student was quoted as saying, ""She seems to me to be a Neo-Facist, and she talks entirely too slow."" is an actual even that is happening at the school. This something that is just as worthy as being on the page as the noose section is. If you do not think the line ""When asked about Ms. Regan, one student was quoted as saying, ""She seems to me to be a Neo-Facist, and she talks entirely too slow."" is uncalled for, that is fine, it can be removed if neccessary." +"::Also, responding to a comment made in the edit summary, both sides of the story ARE put across in the lead and in the article: A small group of ""researchers"" say it's paranormal, the reliable evidence says otherwise. Don't say both sides aren't put across (when they clearly are) just because the side you happen to support isn't given precedence. (Talk) " +" and right at the time of making such allegations to accuse Mr Benjamin Hauwanga. I acknowledge and recognize that the allegations I made have injured the good reputation and name of Mr Hauwanga, and I unconditionally and unreservedly apologize to him , his family, friends and all those who have been affected and inconvenienced by the false allegations I made"" the statement reads further. The two shook hands and embraced each other warmly after Nakanyala finished reading his apology." +Civil law-related stuff Hello Economy1. I was wondering if you would be interested in joining WikiProject Law or WikiProject Supreme Court cases. I ask mainly because since most of the law articles here are contributed by people in common law jurisdictions, our coverage of civil law related articles is woefully thin. I was hoping you could help us change that. I am especially interested in learning about civil law and comparative law in general. Write me back on my talk page when you have time. +You obviously don't have language knowledge of Korean, Japanese, Tungus, Turkic, Mongol, and Ainu. They might not be related at origin, but they certainly have common traits and words that more closely related than any other languages. First, their grammar is very similar in structure, Japanese, Korean and Mongolian have identical grammar. I'm not sure about Turkic language. Korsentry +" Upon further inspection T/C " +The score for the 1982 world championship was 18-15, and not 18-16 as listed in the article. Tim Sandle +" Category talk:Lists of Jews Apparently (talk) 13:14, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)" +I suggest you think carefully about what you're trying to achieve here. +" Possibly the article name is incorrect. Don't have time to look into it right now, but will revisit later. ● ✉ ✓ " +Asserting a primary topic is not POV. It's what every redirect does, that is a ludicrous assertion that shows no knowledge of relevant Wikipedia guidelines. Even dab pages are supposed to put the primary topic at the top of the list. There is no other meaning of Seattle than the city. The city name is a corrupted phonetic spelling of the man, Sealth, and anything else named Seattle names itself after the city. +Umm, I'm actually talking about the article, differing approaches to editing the article and what is important and unimportant to the differing sides, above. +Why is it absurd? It really should be discussed before having it removed. I am adding it back on pending a resolution. You have not resolved it. +" Amy Winehouse The Advocate article that I inserted as a reference into the Amy Winehouse article has Winehouse describing herself as ""bi"". Why did you take issue with it as a source? " +Why is there a random picture of notation in the album cover box? +" Warn If you create a copyright violation again, this account will be blocked. talk " +Need to add RV classifications: A, B, C class etc. Define each class and how this is determined. What are other classifications are there? +PEOPLE ON THIS SITE SUCK PEOPLE ON THIS SITE SUCK +Folger digital library Hi, saw your inquiry, two years ago, i surfed through their luna and uploaded some good things, such as File:Edwin booth-staudenbaur.PNG. i'm sure wikimedia DC would be happy to have an editathon, about how to incorporate their collections. +" Your request for rollback Hi Leszek Jańczuk. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits. Rollback should never be used to edit war. If abused, rollback rights can be revoked. Use common sense. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! '''''' Let's talk about it! " +Youth Does anyone else agree that the youth of Didcot, namely the chavs, are creating a serious problem in Didcot? Until recently, it seemed as if everything was calming down...but now, there are stabbings and everything occuring. Is it just the chavs to blame, or is it the youth population as a whole? +" I have decided to be bold and just do it. Talk " +"Dechronification is the concept of rejuvenation developed by Robert Freitas, that when done through Nanotech, the user reverses the aging process. Freitas suggests that people will be able to utilize Nano-robots to ""remove accumulating metabolic toxins using resperocyte- and microbivore-class intercellular nanorobots in every tissue cell"", ""correct genetic damage using chromosome replacement therapy in every tissue cell,"" and ""repair persistent cellular damage using cell repair devices in every tissue cell."" This idea is a form of futurology. Kurzweil's version of ""Death Is An Outrage"". More concise, easier to read. Kurzweil is a colleague of Freitas (I think). ""Death Is An Outrage"" an essay about the evils of death in the world, and how it'll be countered. Nanotech-related News Article about nano-detoxification and eventually dechronification " +REDIRECT Talk:Estonian anti-German resistance movement 1941–44 +" Replaceable fair use Image:Craig_ferguson.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Craig_ferguson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk " +Thank you Thank you for unblocking me ) I still couldn't edit due to my IP being autoblocked, but I appreciate what you did and I appreciate your comments at WP:ANI. I hope you have a Merry Christmas ) +... Hi, I have no idea what you are babbling about... +1989 ARE YOU STUPID OR WHAT? +Poem When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent; I was not a communist. When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent; I was not a social democrat. When they came for the trade unionists, I did not speak out; I was not a trade unionist. When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out. ([First_they_came...|Martin Niemöller]) Just a classical poem for meditation of all. +A tag has been placed on Uncle grandpa's old cabin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Uncle grandpa's old cabin. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. (t c) +Let's not jump to conclusion yet, I'm legitmarly requesting an unblock and we wait for that. As for you, there is no doubt in my mind about you not being the serial sockpuppeteer Siddique. Just these 3 diffs establishes shows that you are in fact him. 1 2, 3. Btw, I know you from other sites where you everyday bashed Indians and Afghans. You even brgged about your father being a high-ranking military official and that you live in Margalla Hills ) +I would favor merging with Caspian Hyrcanian mixed forests and making this a redirect. The merge proposal from last August seems to have received no attention - so here's some attention, in part based on the seeming misnomer pointed out above by user:ChosroesIV. +" Notability of Matthew rizzotti A tag has been placed on Matthew rizzotti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (Talk, ) " +lol ANI drama Don't take it too personally, man. This sorta thing happens to the best of us even in the real world! everyone knows you're the good guy here. I'm not gonna beg you to come back or anything, but Wikipedia sure will suffer from you leaving. Regards. 207.80.142.5 +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Y. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' " +That section doesn't have anything on proper names that happen to be all-capitalized, though. +" Oppose. It doesn't matter what the official name is, we render it as per MOS:TM, just like Macy's not Macy*s, Toys ""R"" Us not Toys Я Us etc. " +Can it. I made about two sketchy edits. 09:05, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) +Ok, thank you for correcting me. I was trying to find their appropriate subcat but I guess they don't have one yet. +Signature Does it have to appear twice? +Your list is your problem. But if you want to remove the wrestlers other people have put on the list, thats something else. Like it or not, the WWE hardcore title is the most well-known hardcore title and you can't sweep its history under the rug to be replaced by a long list of guys and promotions nobody has ever heard of or went out of business ten years ago. Like I said, this isn't any one person's list of favorite wrestlers. It isn't even a list of famous wrestlers since someone removed that tag. +You're mistaken, I wasn't sure what you were referring to. And you're mistaken about my motive. I don't want you blocked. I want to challenge your assertion that the wishes of the subject are irrelevant. They're relevant to me. They're relevant to the subject. I bet they're relevant to a lot of people here. The other question I'd like to discuss is the appropriateness of you editing the article of a subject whom you've described in insulting and gratuitously demeaning terms. My problem with that is that it makes you not a fit and proper person to edit that page. I'm struggling with the obvious self-evidency of that. I see that as an obviously humiliating position to put our subject in. I guess it's the certain social hurt the man will experience, knowing someone who called him what you called him will be writing the article the world goes to to learn about him, that rules you out. So it comes back to the first question, above: to what extent do we take account of distress? And you won't be blocked for anything you say about me here, at least not by anyone with a brain. +this is false. And not just because your popular fallacy about the Hungarian state continuity. A suggest to read the history of WWII. +" If If you're going to keep editing, then you really ought to revise the top of your page. We don't need a layer of silly accusations about your integrity or truthfulness driven by the disconnect between your words and your actions. Good point, though I've not really decided what my intentions Wikipedia-wise are. For the moment, I'm just checking in occasionally, and dealing with subjects on my existing watchlist, and don't intend to spend much time here - in any case, my personal life is in a state of flux at the moment, and I can't really make any long-term plans. I'll remove the 'Retired' section though, as it is plainly not true. This place still seems to have a hold on me... a little light reading As the only recipient of the Grumpy editor award, I thought you may enjoy a little light reading ☏ 23:01, 20 Jun 2012 (UTC)" +Simple enough, don't edit others posts!! +" Does ""Mhm"" mean you agree with me? If you don't agree, then read below. Fine, I don't even care for the next potential innocent user who gets caught as a sock of . I hope they do because Wikipedia is corrupt for not telling innocent users about banned users. They publicly reveal sex offenders for a reason to protect children. If you won't publicly reveal banned users, then fine. I now know what Wikipedia is. It's a dog-eat-dog world that cares nothing about anyone. Have a nice day. I'm out of here. This is my last comment. " +" ____________________________ why the fuck are you persecuting me? I corrected a misspelling in the oprah article and suddenly im ""vandalizing"". This is bullshit. WillyJeeves" +I don't care if there is a source or not, no one takes wakopedia serious anymore. Unless you are trying to find someones date of birth the rest of the info is so one sided it is like reading a fake letter to DEAR PENTHOUSE - there is no truth in it. +Unalienable Rights Thanks for speaking up when you see blatantly corrupt editing. You should see this guy, Mel, over at Inalienable rights. He's changed the wording of the Declaration of Independence from unalienable to inalienable. If you want to speak up about this too, please feel free. +Admins would have access to exactly the same info that unregistered BLP subjects have access to. In other words, if Kumioko posted using his employer's internet facilities while being logged out in order to evade a block or ban, then BLP subjects could see the IPs used for that abuse just the same as admins could. It has also been suggested that some (or more than some) of the abusive behaviour has been via email. It may be that some IP addresses were disclosed that way. (Not all email providers hide the IPs of people sending emails through them.) (talk) +The arch in her back comfirms that she is facing away from us, also she must have like the most deformed nose on the face of the planet to be facing towards us.211.28.54.73 +" 100 years of women in transport Hi, The campaign is a celebration of the role that women have played in the transport industry as a whole. However, the number of women that entered the transport industry - 100,000 is the number of the UK. Could we agree on this so I can edit it back and place ""United Kingdom"" in the right place? At the moment, after you edited it, it says: The 100 Years of women in transport campaign (or YOWIT) is a celebration of the significant role that women have played in the transport industry over the past 100 years in the United Kingdom, following the centennial anniversary of the First World War, when 100,000 women entered the Transport industry to take on the responsibilities held by men who enlisted for military service. My suggestion is: The 100 Years of women in transport campaign (or YOWIT) is a celebration of the significant role that women have played in the transport industry over the past 100 years, following the centennial anniversary of the First World War, when 100,000 women entered the United Kingdom's transport industry to take on the responsibilities held by men who enlisted for military service. What do you think? Ana " +Your edit to Capital punishment Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.+ R/W +OK, here's how it might be. The 1st copy from 1986 has the 1986 FBI warnings/video dealership announcement & the 1984 classics logo, the copy from 1987 shows the 1984 FBI warnings & 1984 classics logo & their might be a copy from Feb. 5, 1988 that shows the 1988 logo, indicating the 1988 logo did debute in 1988, but back in February, instead of October 'cause 1. That was the 1st 1988 release date their was. 2. Their were some 1988 VHS released on that day, such as Walt Disney Mini Classics: The Wind in the Willows, Walt Disney Cartoon Classics: Special Edition & the 1988 print of Disney Sing Along Songs: You Can Fly!. 1:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC) +, the user is already on a CU request list, as part of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bdemenil, which was basically caused by a sockpuppet mess at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lois de Menil. I used the above as evidence for adding them. +" Some falafel for you! have falafel. wog " +You must be a real loser and mental infant to try to block me when I've obviously improved that page, as a number of editors who have actrually read Hume and have an interest in him, strongly agree. Cheers. +" How the Earth Was Made The dispute has been resolved, in that there will be no more edit warring, if you'd like to go ahead and unlock this article so the others can continue working on it.  (talk · contribs) " +Have you even looked at the citations? I have updated the sources to include many primary and secondary citations. How is it false information if it is repeated by over a dozen books and sites? There is no consensus because several people in your claimed consensus have a conflict of interest in the group BAPS. Please do not revert again or else your will be in violation of wikipedia policy of vandalism. I am going to request for an administrator not affiliated with this discussion to look at it and the topic. I will expand that part in the heading in a article and you are welcome to help me. I have requested admin bbb23 to help me in the past and they have said no so I am going try to contact other admins. Please control yourself from reverting until then. +In regards to your edits at Acid3, you are invited to the discussion at the article's talk page. Please discuss before changing the caption, as it has been explained numerous times that the caption describes the image. The image is for Mozilla Firefox 6.0a1, NOT Mozilla Firefox 8.0a1. If you wish to have the image updated, go for it, and upload Mozilla Firefox 8.0a1, the image and caption can then be updated. However, I ask that you please not continue merely changing the caption, as it is incorrect. It doesn't matter how many times you change it, it will be changed back. If you persist, the page may be semi-protected to prevent further disruptive IP edits. Thank you. - ™ +And no, Nussbaums statement is not biased, it is a summary of the views of experts on the matter. That is the opposite of bias.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· +/* Etymology */=? +" First of all I would contest that you asked ""nicely."" You've consistently been heavy-handed and a bit ""stressed"" in your tone to me, to put it lightly. Secondly, I'd like to see a policy citation for your claim that my comments to a party-opponent in an Arbitration case must be only addressed through the Arbitration committee. Do you have one? P.S.: You don't happen to teach at Connecticut College do you? I know a few people that went there..." +There was certainly commentary as well as the aforementioned sources. I think I understand what the second sentence is trying to say; I'll see if I can find a better source to cite. +It's obvious That you're a labor activist hellbent on a labor extremist agenda. NPOV is now the second different excuse you have used to justify your actions. Assuming the UFCW will settle for less money is not unfair at all. They settled for less than the original offer in the strike of 03-04. It's not the union that settled, it's the workers they supposedly are out to protect. Keep editing and keep coming back with excuse after excuse. It's fun! +I think it should be featured. However it is clearly not FA standard, and it is just as clearly not even start standard as it needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start. +" GA I'm looking for someone to help me turn this into a GA or even an FA. It definitely deserves it. I got some books, video interviews and miscellaneous other stuff related to the album and its creation and release. Hit me up. Release date The article give two release dates. It should only give the date of the first release. I'd correct it myself, but I don't know the true release date. I checked allmusic.com, but was none the wiser. 2008-06-21 Reviews All the reviews are from the 90s and 2000s. Can we get some reviews of the album from when it came out? '''' The Washington Post review Transciption using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. The Washington Post (Jenkins, Mark. d.07. July 6, 1988) review of It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back'' (1988): What does the title mean? Is it a quote? It doesn't seem to make much sense ""millions"" isn't particularly large for a nation. So the title effectively means ""even a particularly feeble nation could easily stave us off"". don't take everything so literally +Comment Shabak is certainly the more prominent term in Israel (ie: in Hebrew). I can confidently say that most people today don't know what you mean if you say Shin Bet. However, in English it is true that the prominent name has remained Shin Bet, for who knows what reason. It is still a Hebrew name, and for all intents and purposes, the wrong one. Until that term is phased out and Western media begins using the correct name, Shabak, I guess Wikipedia policy calls for us to continue using the current (wrong) term. +" Research In the summary of a, so called ""edit"", by an anonymous user of whom we all know it's Peter Lee, done on the 24th of August 2005 (couple of times) it's written: (This version is the most reliable version according to any facts, and according to any source!!! All herein is researched. Mario Roering is a twisted insane person and so are his edits!) Besides the fact that he keeps calling me all kinds of names to which I can only comment look in the mirror!, he is talking about some ""research"". Let me tell you here that this alleged research is the research performed by one single man (you guessed: Peter Lee!). I do not know if he really researched it all and is deliberately twisting the truth, but I have done a counter-research, together with a colleague, and came to a whole bunch of different conclusions!!! So far for this by Peter Lee so called ""research"" then... Now, researched or not, this article here is about WGKF, the World Genseiryu Karatedo Federation. Everything written here is their point of view. It is not necessary to start every single sentence with ""according to WGKF..."", since it is already the title of the article, so it must be clear to anybody that this is about them, from them and according to them! Deleting the facts (researched or not) and replacing them with the 'facts' from one single person who claims to have done research, but only brings in HIS point of view, makes the whole article about something that is NOT WGKF, but maybe about Peter Lee, or, just maybe, about GKIF... And of course that is absolutely wrong! That is not what the article is about... Nobody sees people from WGKF changing the story on GKIF, do you?? 14:36:29, 2005-08-24 (UTC)" +" And I Always Thought It Was Because Editors Who Like To Follow Victorian Capitalization Conventions Had No Other Venue To Get Their Preferred Style On The Main Page... Now I Know The Truth. That Also Explains Why They Wouldn't Work On Anything To Do With Apple Products. (話して下さい) " +Yuo do have that right but that is a right you partialy give up if you want to release something under a free license. Upgradeing to GFDL1.3 is an irrelivance since you can't under the terms of the GFDL stop that. As long as you try and retain these rights your images are not under a free license and will be remove from commons. +see the edit summary does say that +Thugchildz == Thanks for the tip about Thugchildz, and your vigilance. If he's a tinkerer, though, he needs to learn. I'll keep my eyes open, though. And thanks for being a stabilizing influence on that page. Not my style, I'm afraid. Work in a field where you supposed to disagree with everyone else. == +Maintenance Tag on Ryan Howard I hate to break this to you, but that tag has been on Ryan Howard for 3½ years. If you think it is such a noteworthy issue, then YOU should be the one to resolve it. The tag is a distraction. +" You're right, I do want to complain about you Not really you in particular, but the way Wiki is run & the people who enforce it..the people like you. It's really fucking pathetic that Wikipedia is run this way. If Wikipedia ignores truths, and only sources ""reliable"" articles..then it can't be cited at all for being true. If an article basis their opinion off of something unreliable, does that make them unreliable as well? What if they're a reliable source. Or what if that reliable source is reporting on something completely untrue? Doesn't matter apparently, does it. Fuck that, and fuck the people who uphold this. So in short, fuck you. [: 71.59.189.46 " +"I trust this will explain at least some of the discrepancy. The ""$9/barrel"" oil figure isn't referring to the worldwide WTI or Brent or Saudi grades, but is rather referring to the grades that were actually produced in Saskatchewan at the time. " +I'm curious where/how you heard of the OCAP project at Ohio State? +I'm replying to your question on my talk page. – (BoomCha) +Don't delete This page is simply facts about a well known poker player. +" Here's a Globe link to a story where she admits to FOUR. It might be a minor event in her ""creative life"" however, it's what gained her nationwide notoriety and cannot be removed from her biography." +Favorite limerick: The homoerotic GrandInquisitor The attention of other males would spur They'd drool over his bod He'd just think it was odd For the female race he did prefer +" About SMEs, 0RR and reverts Yes, while I agree that we're probably a long way from being able to implement SMEs at Wikipedia (it's something to shoot for, though), my immediate concern, as several examples were given in the RfC, are that a a blanket implementation of 0RR (for example) may at times get in the way of getting a properly balanced, neutral content (as I'm sure you know that NPOV isn't to treat all viewpoints as if they had the same validity, but to treat them commensurately with their weight ""in the real world"" which is far trickier). What I was suggesting was to have a community-wide discussion on the current special editing restrictions that seem to be cropping up, namely to see how they may clash with Wikipedia's core policies, and ways in which we can avoid having this clash and still implement them when necessary. I firmly believe that most of the trouble Elonka got herself into probably comes from the even application of these rules, whose impact on core policies was probably not properly gauged prior to their application. What I'm suggesting is for the community to go back to the drawing board, discuss these rules, see how they can best be applied (are there necessary exceptions, for example?) derive a consensus and implement it. This would avoid this unpleasant feeling of being experimented upon that some editors have, and would go a long way towards reinstating the feeling that the community has the final say on its destinies (by shaping the new rules applying to it). Too optimiitic? Idealist? Maybe yes. But worth a shot, I'm convinced of that. " +HOW LONG CAN I LIVE LIKE THIS I am willing to wager that i need a bite to eat. +" Skinwalker editing other user's discussion page !!!! In this case Canaen's Excuse me but isn't this against the rules? I notice that Skinwalker is now not satisfied at making bogus and erroneous RFCs based on lies or even editing off discussion from his own page and topics - but now even from other user's pages as well. Note here where he edited out discussion from own personal user page! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACanaen&diff;=31378701&oldid;=31378354 His meatpuppet continues on his usual threats of banning anyone that raises this issues for discussion rather than entering into discussion. Skinwalker also removed similar but more fully defined comment from his own page. As someone wrongly accused of being 's meat puppet, I posted the following to his own personal page, the first time we had communicated, and yet Skinwalker removed it! quote ; Just out of interest, who do you think this nark is and why is he so motivated to go about doing what he is doing? I put this record up in the open for you and them to see because I have no and have had no connection with you nor any of the journal pages and, frankly, I take offence at being called a meat or sockpuppet of yours when I am not. I am sure that you are just or even more upset as being accused of a connection with me when you have none.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:Unfortunately though, that is the depth of 's lies and the shallowness of 's integrity.TAB -TABTAB -TAB* Where he has no grounds he invents them and he is, oh, so clever at playing WikiTricks with all these technical terms and methods.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:I am starting to feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany being hunted down, connected to individuals which I have no connection with and their so-called crimes and accused of crimes which are not mine.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:And what of ? He just seems to get off on throwing around his weight whilst avoiding entering into the actually factual discussion.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:For the record - and let them love every minute of their persecution syndrome, let them avidly copy and paste and make little weblinks to this as they are so good at Wikitricks - I am a vegan of 20 years or more standing and, arguably, MacDonald of Clanranald. I became involved in editing the vegan article before you returned to it recently. I am entirely responsible for kicking this whole thing off because I refused to let get away with his ridiculous domination of the article and I put in the same category for his anorexic stuff.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:From my point of view, my objections are largely literary. The article became too bloated and required editing down. It is merely meant to be a definition of what vegan is. I don't see any point in actually engaging in those that oppose veganism. I don't even support vegan's trying to counter counter-vegan propaganda on the Wiki. It is best to keep it short and simple and give a few links so that folks that are interested can go find out more.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:I approached reasonably and got the same sort of response as you did, see ; . When started to engage in his revisions without consultation, I tried to engage him in reasonable discussion, see ; . But he just ignores it.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:Fine. I showed respect, they showed themselves for what they are.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:I find it weird in a way that individuals can become so obsessed by something that they obviously do not love but instead want to demean or destroy - and that means you now - and are willing to invest so much time and energy into it.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:I could understand it if was a paid employee of the meat industry - he says he has professional scientific interest in animal husbandry. That would just make him a paid publicist. But if he is doing this and attacking you in his own free time, I pity him deeply.TAB -TABTAB -TAB:""What were you doing all this evening on your computer, darling?"" His wee wifie asks him.TAB -TAB""Oh, I spent hours trying to stomp on vegans on the internet, made a really good complaint against one and tried to mess up their article with refer +{{unblock|That fuckin +Shakira´s sales Hi, Please don´t change Shakira's sales without an official source. Thanks +ATTENTION!!! The above warnings were issued by a negro. Given this information, please feel free to ignore these notices as if they were never issued. Thankyou. 86.179.112.61 +Just in the guise of editing that section, I felt I had to delete the photo, just not enough text in the area to justify three photographs, and this one was the most expendable. +Maybe this position paper referring relevant Canadian cases may help to show that the prejudices even are apparent in legislation. There are a few references edited by the feminist Alice Schwarzer, she tries to prove there is a way to overcome being a masochist, feel wrong and prefer a wrong lifestyle. +" WP:PAK Welcome! Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like: You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics. You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan. Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia. Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually. Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you. Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around! (talk) " +Retired|date=June 2015|reason=due to on- and off-wiki WP:Harassment and WP:Outing +" Good luck defaming already marginalized views on Wiki due to inherent systematic bias! But ""truth"" will ultimately triumph! " +BTW, please don't take this the wrong way. You seem like a very good editor. I'm just don't understand why you did this. Best, +" I'm done transferring the rivers from the Syria map to the turkey one. Now I'm working on turkey's rivers. _Monitor " +The anonymous user here is believed to be by consensus, a sockpuppet of +Feminist. Legend of Zelda series. Katamari Damacy.? Ok. Forget my last statement. I don't think the social scene is suited for you. Go see the 40 year old virgin. Maybe that will cheer you up. Totalooo! +I listed this because on the sourced web site it is given as an AP photo. The licensing info on Wikipedia on the image page does not appear correct, and I doubt it can be claimed fair use. I'll leave it to the admins to decide whether or not it is.— +Rambling Man|talk]]) 14:45, 2 March 2010 +" Change Order of Potential Candidates As it currently stands, the list of potential candidates is a bit of a mess - specifically, there is no clear order to how the candidates are listed. Gary Johnson at the top of the list? You've got to be kidding me. The order either needs to be changed to reflect the ""tiers"", or alphabetical order. Personally, I'd vote to place the candidates into tiers, but anything (with a logical backing) which replaces the current list, placing footnotes at the top and power players at the bottom, would be an improvement. " +" RepublicanJacobite is the ultimate hypocrite. He jumps on me for my ""personal attacks"", yet he uses them himself. He says that I can't stand not getting my way, yet his Wiki-Nazi style tactics clearly show that it is he who acts like a big baby. He also fails to acknowledge in his rant above that I am also not the only user who reverts his useless edits. I argue that not only is RepublicanJacobite a disruptive presence, he is also a useless human being." +Anon could have been thinking of the recent publication by Chapline which was mentioned in Nature in which he does claim that GR prohibits black hole formation. Perhaps that paper should be mentioned in this article, but only with some strongly worded caveats that the scientific community soundly rejects Chapline's hypotheses, methods, and conclusions, and that his model differs with standard physics in foundational ways. - | Talk +" I corrected so that CNET reads in correct case and that both reference to ExtremeTech's editor is referred as Anthony rather than full name in first, for consistency sake. As far as recalls ""suggested by several media outlets"", that needs to be the word of the reference cited. As far as I can tell, the references cited for that particular sentence only shows that its only the opinion of Anthony to suggest recall. My edit is based on what I can locate in the reference. ""prevalence""... also not able to locate. " +" I believe that was in response to Zaroves threats to publish Acharya's credit info online if I didn't back off and let him have his way with the article. Procuring a credit report under false pretenses is a crime. In addition, a wanted kidnapper is known to have passed around Acharya's personal info to religious groups, suggesting that Zarove may have been in contact with this person. Where, for example, did he get the 'Melne' middle name from?? His story has been that he is a former reporter, with a ""masters in journalism"", and that he wrote an article about Acharya for a tennessee newspaper; he says he procured this info in his research efforts. Though he will give his full name, he will not give the name of the newspaper, the title of the article, the date it was published, nor will he back up his ""masters in journalism"" claim. In addition, he claims he was a physics major in 2001. Masters in Journalism, a year and half in physics, and a job as a reporter a few years ago... all by the time he was 26. " +Shay Horovitz An anonymous user keeps adding that swarming was introduced into iMesh by Shay Horovitz. I have two problems with this: The user only links to Mr. Horovitz' personal web page, which does not even mention this, and there are no citations. Is Mr. Horovitz notable for this? If so, why does he not have his own wikipedia page? If not, why is it noteworthy in this article? Before it is readded to the article, both of these need to be addressed. - Dear user FryGuY, I approve that the requested changes were correct. My personal web site was simply not updated for years. You may contact me using the mail that appears in the web site if needed. All the best, Shay Without an independent source to verify this, it still violates Wikipedia's Wikipedia:No original research policy. Until it is verifiable, it simply isn't information which can be included. - +"Rebecca, ""Sanakoyev is leader only in name."" So is Kokoity, an importer an self designated ""President."" As you see in the Sanakoev case, anybody can charade the status of Presidency of a Republic size of some village. I can also create a de facto suvereign republic here in Canada and appoint Borat Sadgiev as the President. At least those so called elections by Sanakoev gave an equal opportunity to both Ossetians and Georgians. Unlike Mr Kokoity who not only forbade Georgians to take part in his so called elections but you could not make difference who was leading the separatist in Tskhinvali, his gang or Putin. When you enter Tskhinvali, a big picture of Mr Putin is visible everywhere with the slogan, “Putin is our President”. Comical if not tragic. " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Carambola. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" The Graceful Slick.... Is non other than an ungraceful dick!81.153.48.177 " +I'll try. Any chance anybody over there wants to work on it with me? (talk) +" New article Hey Bogdan, I finially decided to create the Istro-Romanians article today (mostly split-off from Istro-Romanian language). If you would like to contribute, that would be great. Thanks, khoi " +https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff;=547733419&oldid;=547733007 Another personal attack you guys made a double standard for. +" Civil servant categories I noticed some of the categories you were making — I don't know that ""civil"" is supposed to be capitalized (the categories in , for example, do not have it capitalized). Just wanted to let you know. –  " +After my experience here, I think that I can honestly say that I've lost any respect that I might have had for Wikipedia as an information source and, should I ever decide I need to post here again, I'll simply do it under a different IP and user name. Persons like those who gathered here to engineer a block for me, and persons like 'slime,' could care less about the factual accuracy or integrity of the articles here, simply want to push their agenda, and they have the free-time resources to do so. Persons like myself, with jobs and lives, will NEVER be able to compete with them. I do regret that I once, in a moment of pique, changed scjessey's user page - an action which was beneath me - but even that tells me of the potential of this 'community' to draw one in to its immature nature and irrelevancy. So, in a nutshell, josi, take your block and your forgiveness and shove it up your severely puckered rectum, if you can find room for it, and continue with your left wing cabal to maintain Wikipedia as irrelevant and pointless as it curently is. Do nothing to prevent obvious Obama supporters to sanitize his appearance here, and then go on to your other liberal icons to do the same thing. My time actually has a value to it, and yours clearly does not. +REDIRECT Talk:Yantra Mantra (Delhi) +The puppet has been blocked, but the puppetmaster is still free, they will come back after the autoblock to cause more trouble. +Wknight94, thanks for your response, and thanks again for your willingness to stick up for me. I'm not quite ready to beg forgiveness to the powers-that-be, but if/when I am, I'll let you know. Trust me, if this happens I'll tone it down. Keep up the great work! Best, Googie Man. +images just cos wikipedia is not censored doesn't mean you should put disturbing images up, if people really want to see an image of it you can put a link on the page. it is pretty grotesque. +"Reverted. ""Insurgency"" is completely improper in this context. Provisional government was something very weak. It was hit from both sides: monarchists and bolsheviks. What bolsheviks did in October was it all respects similar to a palace coup: they simply beheaded the state. Concerning the formal applicability, you are advised to know that before the October there country was in the state of so-called ""double power"" (""dvoevlastie""): upper echelon was Provisionary Government, local power mostly in the hands of Soviets. And the majority in Soviets were Mensheviks, by the way. And this is a traditionally used term, although criticized. So please stop playing semantic games. mikka (t) " +Prestige speculations I don't know, but just deal with it, or get the page protected or something. I have to deal with crap all the time on Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull because fanboys like spreading rumours. +Letter This is a brief letter from my son. He wrote it without anyone telling him to: Dear Wikipedia editors, I am very sorry for my bad behavior. I realize it was unacceptable and stupid. I promise I will never do anything like this again. I have learned my lesson and I have realized that I have hurt many people by doing this. I did not mean to hurt anybody's feelings, and now that I realize I did I am sorry and won't do it again. Please accept my most sincere apologies and my word that I will only edit in good faith from this point on. Thank you. +Eh, I'll respond anyway. Look, , let me give it you straight. You and I are not so different. There are 24,000,000 Wikipedians on this site. And those teeming masses exist for the sole purpose of lifing the few exceptional people onto their shoulders. You and me, we're exceptional. However, these Wikipedians, the majority of them, are liberal. And they love to advance liberal/progressive causes, but also find some Republicans/conservatives amusing. But the one thing they love more than a conservative politican, is to see that conservative fail, fall, die trying. In spite of everything this conservative has done for them (such as Jesse Helms), eventually they will hate you. That is why I came to Wikipedia. I came not only to fix some factual errors prevalent in some Wikipedia articles; I also came to give a much more NPOV to articles involving conservatives, where oftentimes bias, and even some out-and-out factual distortions, are prevalent. Wikipedia's time has come for fixing. Like Constantinople or Rome before it, this place has become a breeding ground for suffering, bias, and injustice. It is for this reason, Bbb23, I'm asking you to unblock me. Yes, I will follow Wikipedia's rules to the letter if you do. As far as I'm aware, there's nothing in Wikipedia's rules against removing bias from articles. In fact, WP:NPOV encourages it. Think about it, Bbb23. I could accomplish a lot of good. Adios, +Trust me...you cant possibly even imagine it! +" I was trying not to bog down my statement with too many terms, in that the goal of my statement was that gender is not relevant in the term of pedophilia. This IP poster seems to have mistaken the term ""pedophilia"" to refer to the sex itself, and I was attempting to point out that this is incorrect. I was not isolating to just sex, but the full spectrum, making CSA the most appropriate term. ""Statutory rape"" is not a very good term to use, because a) it is not used very often in laws themselves, but rather is a more of a pop term b)it technically only refers to intercourse and c)it can include sex with an mature but mentally handicapped adult. I'm not ever sure why we are even responding to this IP poster. My initial impression was the post was some kind of homophobic soapboxing spouted by a bigoted individual, with nothing remotely constructive to offer this article. I pondered erasing it altogether under trolling guidelines, but I decided to just assume good faith in hopes of a reply. But given the lack of reply, it would seem this was a drive-by. " +Neoplatonism Hi. Can you explain your concern at Talk:Neoplatonism for me? +" Disambiguation link notification for May 5 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of heliports in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Covenant Health (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, " +" You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruption of Wikipedia. You are welcome to come back after the block expires, if you will make useful contributions. * 21:01, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC)" +NPOV removed I've removed the NPOV template, please use {{POV-section}} for sections or {{POV-statement}} for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - Boy +" ok. I still seemed to be blocked, however... did you lift it? Ludwigs2 " +" I've called it a day on this situation. Last response is here.TC " +The song is loosely derived from the poems you mentioned though it still belongs to Ace. About the style of music... why would Sarievski have had to compose music in a distinctly Vardar way? BTW, Your figures are a little off. It's more like 8% as Tito was born in 1892 (100 - 92 = 8). It's all a huge conspiracy, you see. +" It is unresolved, as there is no biding policy in effect. Or do you know any different? And while editing the section title you could have chosen to fix the spelling, but you didn't. I don't think that was a particularly friendly or impartial edit, circumstances being what they are. And your linking to a redirect in your comment amply shows bending reality, as the city continues to be lodged at Priština. So, I submit, pushing things under the rug and telling me to shove off to another talk page is hardly indicative of consensus, either, especially as another reverting gentleman is insisting that it be hashed out again on this page and agreed to, before any reasonable NPOV improvements can be introduced. In all, what I see here is forcing the issue of spelling ""Pristina"", opposition or other evidence be damned. talk " +" ""I really like the chart, but not in this article Jeff Dahl "" ""Could you explain why? It is one of the most influential and popular works JP published. Awadewit | talk "" Yes the work was influential. That is why we have the sentence: ""The trustees of Warrington were so impressed with Priestley's lectures and charts that they arranged for the University of Edinburgh to grant him a Doctor of Law degree in 1764."" You could even say ""...impressed with Priestley's Lectures on History: A Chart of Biography and A New Chart of History that they arranged..."" Keeping the image is okay, but I would cut down the prose. But that sentence doesn't really demonstrate the work's influence. Priestley's degree is not really important at all. Priestley also designed visual study aides for his Lectures on History: A Chart of Biography (1765)[26] and A New Chart of History (1769).[27] According to Priestley, they ""impressed"" upon students ""a just image of the rise, progress, extent, duration, and contemporary state of all the considerable empires that have ever existed in the world"".[28] Both charts had accompanying prose descriptions and were popular for decades—A New Chart of History had gone through fifteen editions by 1816.[29] The trustees of Warrington were so impressed with Priestley's lectures and charts that they arranged for the University of Edinburgh to grant him a Doctor of Law degree in 1764.[30] There are currently four sentences on the charts - one introducing them, one explaining them, one detailing their reception, and one providing a conclusion/transition of sorts. What about this new version? ""Priestley also designed two Charts to serve as visual study aides for his Lectures on History, which ""impressed"" upon students ""a just image of the rise, progress, extent, duration, and contemporary state of all the considerable empires that have ever existed in the world"". Both charts were popular for decades and the The trustees of Warrington were so impressed with Priestley's lectures and charts that they arranged for the University of Edinburgh to grant him a Doctor of Law degree in 1764."" | talk " +Neutral? Isn't this article a bit one-sided? It explains superstitious belief in ghosts, then an analysis of skepticism towards ghosts, along with scientific evidence to disprove ghosts' existance. This is fine with me, but shouldn't there be some information about scientific research in favor of ghosts' existence. I've been doing a bit of reading here and there, and the evidence does exist. I don't have enough resources or information to write it myself, however I'd appreciate it if someone could look into it. +where is Djibouti? Djibouti is under ur back +Re: Neutral point of view I have cited at least one source to back up the facts I added to the players. Adding their strengths does not reflect my opinion of the players, it is a fact. The players are recognised worldwide. +Agreed MalkeA very fine university, CATHOLIC, founded I believe by a FRENCH priest....with a FOOTBALL team known as the Fighting IRISH. 173.76.208.66 +and accurate article on a controversial subject then it should not produce +I have edited some parts of the children and divorce section, and also posted a part in the lead section. I will be working on more in the upcoming week. +Disagree: It's still too soon. Trevor Noah still has over a month before he starts. We have no idea how different it's going to be, or how long it's even going to last. For all we know, he could suddenly get replaced before he even starts. Is that likely? No. But it is possible. +The speed at which the aircraft will fly is lower, but it may take more time to reach that speed because of the extra drag. The change in distance depends on the specific aircraft, as will the amount of flap the manufacturer would recommend for takeoff. If it lacks power - such as a loaded Cessna 172, the amount of flap deflection suggested for takeoff will be very small, and more proficient pilots have been known to accelerate without flaps, then lower them when they have reached the flaps down flying speed. Had they used full flaps all the way, the extra drag would reduce acceleration so that it would take longer to reach even the lower speed now needed. On aircraft with more power, more flap deflection is possible, always balancing the additional drag with the reduction in acceleration. Presumably this section needs to be rewritten to make it clearer. +", 12 September 2014 (UTC) Doug: Are you the judge of whether Watson or anyone else claiming to be the 2nd Coming of the Christ is or is not? No, you are not! He has produced 7 cutting-edge theories and has presented some of them at a major NASA conference. I see them at several locations around the Internet when googling: 7 Seals revealed. They certainly may be questioned as to whether they are correct, but as of now, they certainly have not been proven wrong! I've read them and have concluded that they explain the prophecy of the Revelation better than anyone else; better than anything else on this page. Note: The book Soul Survivor has now proven reincarnation as has the work of Dr. Ian Stevenson at Univ. of Virginia and Dr. Brian Weiss author of Many Lives, Many Masters to name just three examples of many. Jesus son of Joseph taught reincarnation in ''Matthew 11:14-15, ""If you are willing to accept it, John the Baptist is Elijah returned. He who has ears to hear, let them hear."" Are you not willing to accept Jesus' teachings? You apparently don't have 'ears to hear', yet you want to lord over this article and talk page?! There are a lot of websites used as sources and links. And whether you like Watson or not, he should have his theories included here and his links listed. - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.130.115 15:03" +.sO YOU BITCH NIGGAS MUST NOT SAY SHIT.......YOU HEARD? +" Bosnian article: The common base (vocabulary, grammar and syntax) of what are today officially four national standards is sometimes subsumed under the term ""Serbo-Croatian"" in English; dating from the 19th century, this term was modeled on both Croatian and Serbian nationalists of the time and is today controversial for native speakers[7] Tag on the discussion page of Bosnian language: Use of that term in English, which dates back at least to 1864 and was modeled on both Croatian and Serbian nationalists of the time, is not a political endorsement of Yugoslavia, but is simply a label. Croatian article: These four dialects, and the four national standards, are sometimes subsumed under the term ""Serbo-Croatian"" in English, though this term is controversial for native speakers[7] and paraphrases such as ""Bosnian-Croatian-Montenegrin-Serbian"" are therefore sometimes used instead, especially in diplomatic circles. Bosnian article: As result, paraphrases such as ""Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS)"" are instead used increasingly, especially in official context. Serbo-Croatian article Prior to the 19th century, they were called ""Illyric"", ""Slavic"", ""Slavonian"", ""Bosnian"", ""Dalmatian"", ""Serbian"" or ""Croatian""[34] Bosnian article: Prior to the 19th century, the various contemporary standards were called ""Illyric"", ""Slavic"", ""Slavonian"", ""Bosnian"", ""Dalmatian"", ""Serbian"" or ""Croatian""[8] I rest my case, and in case you really want to push I truly hope you have a good explanation other than that it ""sounds a bit strange"". " +"Giambigarchy == Born on January 8, 1971 in West Covina California was a man who would grow to become a giant in the game of baseball. [|Jason Giambi]would move to the New York Yankees after winning the MVP award in 2001 with the Oakland Athletics. There he would never truly live up to his potential, until the year of our lord 2008. Going into the 2008 season that New York Yankees had a positive outlook returning countless all-star veterans, including [|Giambi], mixed with a crop of young talent not seen in the Yankee farm system in years. As the season progressed the Yankees did not reach the expectations of themselves, fans, and the entire front office. As the Yankees stumbled along, one of the bright spots was the fairly consistent play of [|Jason Giambi]. Minimal expectations had been placed upon him for the year, and his contributions had been important to the team staying above .500. With his fan popularity growing, he decided to try something that some may call ugly, but others may call the pinnacle of a potential religious or governmental view. As the fans and himself refer to it as, ""the stache"", it has become an icon for not only [|Giambi], but the entire Yankee team. With other players such as Andy Pettite and Johnny Damon joining [|Giambi] with the facial hair, than shaving away, it was clear that this simple patch of lip fur was here to stay. Despite some claims that ""Just For Men"" has been involved in the increasing color and thickness of said ""stache"", there have been no official remarks from [|Giambi]. The infusion of the ""stache"" into the everyday life of Yankee fans has formed the potential for a governmental ideology, justly named the Giambigarchy. It is a simple view which includes drinking plenty of beer, and growing incredible upper lip fur. A view that may conflict with the current Republican/Democratic debate for the upcoming election, but surely a view that would not start any wars in Iraq, or drive gasoline prices over $4.00/gallon. We of the Giambigarchy way of view encourage you took to take a long look at your own ""stache"" and ask, ""Do I represent myself the way [|Jason Giambi] and his facial attributes do?"" That is the only question required for acceptance of the Giambigarchy point of view, and we recommend any fan ask themselves that question. The governmental form under the Giambigarchy is a very open-minded yet structured form that allows for the basic freedoms of its followers, and party members, yet remains an extremely fun-loving and positive outlook on life that other religions, and governments have failed to achieve. The savior [|Jason Giambi] has led by example to bring together his followers, encouraging them to live their lives with what is referred to as ""stassion"". This is a twist on passion, as of course one must dawn the proverbial mustache. This very close knit, and increasingly popular group has reached a new way of life, and the numbers of proud followers are completely staggering. Established in May of 2008, Giambigarchy registered members have reached to a total of 13,422 (as of July 5th, 2008). Work Cited: ""U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices."" Weekly U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices, Regular Grade. Energy Information Administration. 27 Mar. 2009 . Jason Giambi."" Jason Giambi. Wikipedia Institute of Higher Education. 30 Mar. 2009 . ""Mustache Pro's and Con's."" Mustache Pro's and Con's. Mustache Aficionado. 30 Mar. 2009 . Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giambiology"" == " +You still haven't answered me properly; I would like to know where exactly in the page you referred to does it say that my version of the disambiguation page is wrong and yours or EconomistBR's are right. Clarify things for the good of Wikipedia, please. +, 4 November 2010 (UTC) I grew up in a stately home and let me assure you the internet is but a passing phase - hideous modern marvels such as templates will be the first to go with the coming of our Lord from the heavens. I appreciate you have your reasons, but as the good book says in revelations, templations are an obscenity condemned to eternal damnation by the LORD. 86.47.30.250 21:47 +" ""IMPORTANT and ""SIGNIFICANT"" This is not something that we can address at the article level. You need to bring this up on the Talk pages at WP:BIO and WP:N. WP:V also comes into play here. talk " +"Hi. You should be aware of the following official Wikipedia policies - this is an excerpt from WP:EL: Links normally to be avoided Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject—and not prohibited by restrictions on linking—one should avoid: Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. See Reliable sources for explanations of the terms ""factually inaccurate material"" or ""unverifiable research"". Any site that attempts to surreptitiously install malware on a visitor's computer. Links mainly intended to promote a website. Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use the ""ISBN"" linking format, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources. You recently added a link to Western honey bee that violated the last two of these restrictions; I know the temptation to use WP to promote your site is strong, and you can claim that your site includes useful information, but it STILL self-promotion, and you SELL things on that website. You can't link that on Wikipedia. Note the following additional excerpt from the same policy page: Advertising and conflicts of interest Due to the rising profile of Wikipedia and the amount of extra traffic it can bring a site, there is a great temptation to use Wikipedia to advertise or promote sites. This includes both commercial and non-commercial sites. You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked. If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Wikipedia editors decide whether to add it. This is in line with the conflict of interest guidelines. Note that since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links may not alter search engine rankings. This is not personal, it's simply a matter of an official WP policy, and everyone has to play by the same rules. " +" Translation of the name Should the name really be translated into English? For example, on the Catalan wikipedia, would one talk about (for example) ""Plaid Cymru"" or ""el Partit de Gal·les""? Would one talk about ""l'UMP (Union pour la Majorité Presidentielle)"" or ""l'UMP (Unió per la Majoritat Presidencial)""? I've yet to see many articles about the ""Peoples' Party (Spain)"", ""We Can"" or ""Citizens"", but yet ""United Left"" and ""Spanish Workers' Socialist Party"" appear to be in use... My rationale for this is that I would always refer to ""Carrer Balmes"" rather than ""Balmes Street"", to ""Poblenou"" rather than ""New Town"" and to the ""Eixample"" rather than the ""Expansion"" - but then, I might be biased, so want to hear alternative points of view! This is meant to be the start of a discussion rather than anything else... Please add to the discussion ) If the result of this is that names shouldn't be translated, I'd recommend that this page me moved to ""Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya"", and (for example) ""Initiative for Catalonia - Greens"" be moved to ""Iniciativa per Catalunya - Verds""..." +Here's the deal, if you reconstruct all those Pricing Game articles that were deleted not long ago, and help contribute by finding sources for them, then everything will be forgiven Do we have a deal? +I wish to get a page blanked that has libelous info about my younger sister, has been blanked by Flo Night but vandal keeps bringing it back. +Concerning East High School You suck. Why did you change the page? East High has no Noted Alumni. When I make well needed changes, please leave them be. +REDIRECT Talk:Chicago Cubs franchise history +" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar thank you. " +Great! Say it loud! But all your cabal, русские братья, are tightly watched. +You have 2 people work together on reverting (> 3 changes) without discussion and reason for removing my change first. +" New messages for you... ...at my talk page. Thank you.···「m/Talk」 " +Can someone explain why a firm with so much positive work has been defined by Wiki only for controvery ? NY Times and Biz Week featured the firm - Why not much more on the positive they have done ? User:unsignd +However, I AM kinda bored. Entertain me. +Hello, thank you for changing your edits. I noticed you have also directly cited tweets on the Maria Chappelle-Nadal page and would hope you understand that those fall under much the same conditions for reversion as citing Youtube as a source. The policy at Wikipedia, whose function is foremost that of an encyclopedia, has a high standard of asking assertions to be verifiable, not only true. Similarly, the means of such verifiability are reliable sources who are independent, third-parties. Exceptional primary sources may be used, but they must be interpreted only through separate secondary-source materials. In this way Wikipedia content can be relied upon as neutral and informed. Thank you, happy editing! +gay people and minorities sent to concentration camps to get gassed with Xyklon B. P +" You forgot to add in your user page ""Being a fucking deaf moron"" == YOU FUCKING MORONIC PIECE OF SHIT. YOU CAN""T EVEN QuOTE CORRECTLY. Here's what you quoted for the house episode ""airborne"" ""I'm a board certified expert in infectious disease, whereas she just hands out parking spaces."" Here's what he ACTUALLY Said ""I'm a board certified specialist in infectious disease, she assigns parking spaces."" Man, it's fucking morons like you that makes wiki so shitty. Mid 40 yr old piece of shit. stop bragging about reading x number books, or working at the largest company, you're clearly falling apart biologically and if you can't even hear correctly, how the fuck are you going to contribute to wiki? Thanks asshole for fill wikipedia with crap. Please for fuck sakes do NOT be a wikipedian. You are a MORON. you can't even quote correctly, what makes you think you can read, write correctly? Go back to working for coka cola as a janitor. ==" +Imagine images! I checked Commons and I really like these images. Could someone please add them to the article? File:The Blue Marble.jpg File:Bachalpseeflowers.jpg File:Sunset in El Porto, California (8074300769).jpg File:Polarlicht 2.jpg File:Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg File:Schoolgirls in Bamozai.JPG Thanks zillions !! +You might also say that humans are the parasites of the world, but this isn't the point. A parasite is an organism that increases its own fitness (reproductive success) while causing a cost to the fitness of another individual. Since all pets obtain food (and veterinary treatment) due to time and money spent by humans, they should be classified as parasites. It doesn't matter that the human perceives a benefit. If a mosquito injected you with ecstasy while it sucked your blood you wouldn't claim that it shouldn't be classed as a parasite. +the streets and attempted to steal his food. The girl found herself pummeled to within +"::::*Well.. The first thing is when I wanna to do a real contribution, I saw a message (the notification).. Then I saw a link on his page, so I just clicked and saw he has been blocked. I was like ""haha, lets tease him abit"", then I edit. After doing so I was like feeling guilty cause this is not wikipedia is supposed to, so I quickly removed my edit.. Then when I wanted to go back to my real edit, I can't do it anymore after 30 minutes.. Please..... " +hi im bob and i know notthing about flamethrowers. so DEEZ NUTS will help me tell you about it +January 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the welcome, Doncram, and I'm glad you were able to merge these pages! 23:39, 8 +From the looks of the above posts, it looks like you have a bad habit of doing this sort of thing. how can I report you to a more senior Wikipedia administrator to have your rights removed, and your access blocked +I mean benzoin resin. I'll change it right now to disambiguate. The new edits by Stone are good additions. +", 19 June 2014 (UTC) It does not follow that ""well-documented"" means it should feature ""prominently"" in this article. For the reasons I said above, article space in this article must give more weight to descriptions of anarcho-capitalism from people within the movement since this article is the only reasonable place that content (also ""well-documented"") belongs. @ 21:40" +BRAPPAGE fucker don't u dare delte shalamo i will com to ur house and chop your penis off and make your parents eat it and the i will send you an earlobe in the post and keep sending you parts of a body and will then come and slice and dice you into 500,000 pieces and then make your family eat you body in a chili. SO DON't DELETE IT OR THT WILL HAPPEN YOU FAT SHIT +FC Korsaaven Hello, Kevin! I noticed you just declined my speedy deletion for the reason 'article is not a bio'. Unless I'm mistaken, the templates encompasses people, groups, companies, etc. In a quick Google search, I was able to find virtually nothing asserting notability regarding the football/soccer club. +Stop editing Vanna page It is metalcore, not post-hardcore. I don't need no verifiability, listen to the album you twat. I will have you banned if you continue this editing war/ vandalism of Vanna (Band). +douchebag you're an asshole. charlie. +" The thing is, old teninch removes that list while adding the same kind of thing to other articles. ALSO, people like myself and the user ""spongbob"" spent time in that mall, where the idiot didn't. If he wouldn't keep reverting, I could spend more time researching the dates - eventually we would like to put the list in chronological order (to us, it's like losing an old friend - I at least grew up in that mall in it's heyday). Think you can talk some sense into him? 99.139.231.245 " +"==Please don't be silly== Please don't monkey about with joke edits, such as your edit to Dublin Super Cup. We try hard here to produce something we can all be proud of, and silliness doesn't help. Articles are monitored, and users messing around could be blocked. Why not try contributing something useful instead? Have a look at the links below and get stuck in properly:   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help pages   Tutorial   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Fun stuff... Thanks – and enjoy yourself as a responsible Wikipedian! " +I am blocked right now? Doesn't seem that way, though I have no idea why. +" The Wikipedia criteria is flexible citing new wikis as links to ""normally be avoided"" but it is not an absolute block. A more comprehensive look at these Debatepedia.org articles is warranted I think." +killamanjario shut the fcuk up cracka +" Yeah I saw, thanks. I've been looking for a better one from a Northern Ireland or UK source rather than from another country, but it'll be fine for now. Even the Irish Wikipedia uses that name, so not sure where the edit change from the other user came from. talk " +Thank you. I did not say it was a single book, but what you linked to says it is a 'corpus,' and it is often published at once, though apparently there is debate whether it was all written by Zoroaster. At least for what Zoroaster wrote, I think philosophy does play a part, mostly involving semantics (difficult; knowing esoteric philosophy helps to interpret spiritually/divinely inspired texts) as you described, but perhaps also with gematria, or as HPB wrote, perhaps with 5 other methods than these latter 2. Since many esoteric mystics have consensus on philosophy, not the least of which is ethics, methods of interpretation are important. For example, such mystics would say animal sacrifice in the Avesta should not be done but is symbolic of something, as it is thought to be in the Vedas, etc.. +" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Truthout. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +I don;t mind terribly if it is in the body but that citation needs to go per the MoS. This artilce made it to GA despite the bickering and should stay there. +Consensus is not majoritarianism, you do have a point. May be we can adjust the way it was before? The Priest's image in early history on the left doesn't look good since it is sending text to right from the start. Previous set up was fine - or if it can be lowered a bit without any sandwiching below to let a line or two above to start from margin. I've enlarged Minar-e-Pakistan to give it prominence it has (can be scaled down a bit if it's too large). Quaid's photograph had related text in the above section so shifted there. +REDIRECT Talk:John Loveday (experimental physicist) +You have no idea whatsoever what I think about TM, and if you think you do you are sadly and grossly mistaken. Now, rather than engage in further personal attacks, are you interested in actually responding to the substance of my comments? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Freekey Zekey. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. // Talk // Contribs " +I hate to think there might be some darker purposes at work here, but this is really going over the top. +" Are you twelve years old? Feel free to ""report"" me for removing completely unnecessary statements like ""generally enough to win the game."" 8 runs is a lot of runs and is usually enough to win. No shit, Sherlock! Where would we all be without this valuable tidbit of information? Since your first edit to the page on Apr 4, you've made about 75 of the 110 edits to the page. So closer to 70% rather than 90%or does that constitute original research??? One of the many reasons Wikipedia is a sewer is because certain editors absolutely refuse any sort of editing to their writing, which kind of defeats the purpose of ""editing,"" and rather act as if they own the page, just as you've done with this page. I removed your patently false statement and corrected it with a factual one, yet you insist on restoring a completely unnecessary statement about ""generally enough to win the game."" That statement is also redundant to the factual statement ""every team with a player hitting two grand slams in a game has won the game."" 68.81.192.142 " +Added Christ myth theory. The hypothesis is endorsed, not by reputable historians of the period, but by a handful of radically skeptical, secularist or New Age authors, journalists, and professors of other subjects, who lack advanced degrees in ancient history. This example, along with some of the others up there, still needs source citations, however. 98.91.4.71 +CHosen is Japanese transliteration of Chosun. It would be a POV to use Japanese terminology throughout the article. +1st page 2nd paragraph +Robin Hogarth How come you removed Robin's British Scientologists category? +" Just because a source doesn't mention something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist! If a book talks about China, but fails to mention nearby Mongolia, doesn't mean that Mongolia doesn't exist! Only if the source says that ""Muhammad chose Sa'd alone"", ""only Muhammad chose Sa'd"", then we can infer a possible contradiction. " +Also, User:GSK did in fact just verify you were lying about me behing retaliatory, you're simply making a fool of yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:72.72.240.141_reported_by_User:GSK_.28Result:_Protected.29 +What 24.119.163.71 +What does the WHOIS information give you that would indicate that? Do you even understand the information?78.68.210.173 +" Am I the only one who isn't getting any text in that article (except the first line)?? Firefly322, if you want to write an article but only have headings right now, you should seriously consider using your userspace to develop it at least to have some content. However, there are concerns about duplicating/forking content, so maybe you should be sure it's going to be a productive/worthwhile use of your time. I would also point out that it is not our job to teach first-year physics with calculus, nor are we here to write articles ""For Physicists and Engineers."" " +This passage was removed It allows opposition leaders not only to avoid authorities pressure themselves, but also to protect their supporters by direct interference in arrests, searches etc. E.g., during the 2001 UBK campaign, the deputies were trying to prevent the mass groundless arrests of youth in Kyiv by breaking into militsiya precincts and vehicles. I agree it's rather specific, but it does colourfully illustrate the rather extreme degree to which immunity applies. The image of parliamentary deputies participating in what would be considered mass hooliganism by some is just too precious to leave out. Perhaps it can be more concise, or move over to Politics of Ukraine? — 17:24, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC) +Presidency I splitted the Presidency part of the article into its own article because it's getting too large. We have similar sections for George Washington and George W. Bush. It was reverted, and I think I need a second opinion on this. +" Maybe not (I'm sure that there is nothing to stop you adding one if it fits), but it was still very POV - since the article said (I did look at it) Somewhere around 60,000 demonstrators, many from the so-called ""Tea Party"" tax protest movement, gathered in Washington on Saturday, September 12, 2009, to express concerns about President Obama's health care reforms - I would not call that ""pro-Obama"" - or am I missing something? '''''' (Talk) " +Yes. Wanderer can say in 10 words what it takes me 100 words to say. ( ) +" Q 10: Is it okay to call jesus ""bastard""? Of course, it is 👍." +" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar Thank you C.Fred. Very helpful. I have placed a request for a re-named username to be compliant. I did not know this. Thank you also for your comments on how to improve my article. I have taken note and added 27 more citations from four more new additional newspaper sources. I truly believe the Milton Rotary Club is unique and exceptional even though it is a part of an international organization. While most clubs are declining in membership and have not accomplished much as a result, the Milton Rotary Club is growing and has accomplished a lot, received a lot of media exposure including being featured multiple times on television in Canada. Thanks for your help. I'll continue to think of ways to demonstrate this and remain objective. Miltonrotary (talk) " +Possibly unfree Image:Kahuluiairportmap.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kahuluiairportmap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +" Hi John Thank you very much for your exceptionally kind words, and for all the wonderful things you say about my work on Wikipedia. I am pleased to say that I have absolutely no recollection of any previous dispute between us, and am happy for it to stay way. Online discussions omit so many of the cues which we use to make face-to-face communications workable, and it's horribly easy for misunderstandings to develop, tempers to flare and for any of to be far less than our best. I too have shown less than my best at times. I hope that I have learned from that, as you have. Let bygones be bygones. Thank you for suggesting me as a possible ArbCom candidate. I did briefly consider it, but realised that responsibility for ArbCom's important role is an incredibly time-consuming job. There is no way that I would want to commit that much of my time, especially since I think I would find a lot of it rather depressing! For example, years ago I had some tussles with the obsessive longevity tag-team, long before they got to ArbCom. The sheer volume of repetitive discussion was exhausting, and I don't currently want to commit myself to having to engage with that sort of drama. Maybe at some point in the future, my life will be less busy and I may feel up to offering my services, but not now. Best wishes, (talk) • (contribs) " +We should probably talk about this Because it could, potentially, result in the deletion of literally dozens of articles I've worked on. Has there been some sort of movement to strip charting albums from the kinds of things we look for in determining notability? That worries me terribly, because charting an album is no mean feat, even on the satellite genre-specific charts, and is really an ironclad indicator of a group's widespread popularity. What do you think about this? I'd like to have an honest talk about it before it turns into an AfD battle. I'm so sick of fighting with people over notability issues here. +Please,do not convert this page in a linguistics page.Please,go back to Kwami redaction ,without repetitions and good English.Please,add my own slight corrections of errors to Kwami redaction.Thank you +Kejsi would be pronounced like kege-si in English, notice the j as in Joe. +,Khoikhoi and EdJohnston has taken side in this dispute. +Banned In light of the evidence of your misdeeds and the overwhelming support for banning you at WP:CSN, you have blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. +I have also amended the section on Tanolis by deleting the quote from The Imperial Gazetteer of the North West Frontier Province as on the relevant page it does not make any mention of Raja Tanoli or Raja Mal. Instead the origin of Tanolis is attributed to Yousafzais and the Barlas Mughals. Hence, the misquote has been deleted. User: Pakhtun Tanoli 14:47, 15 November 2006 +2008 (UTC) The current picture on the article looks like something from a propaganda posterI don't mean to say it is, just that it looks about as ridiculous. 16:04, 8 October +and in spite of the fact of this article already being favorable to outside recruiters, +Regarding edits made during October 27 2006 (UTC) to Hinsdale Central High School Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (talk)(contribs) +A tag has been placed on Patrick Cecil Bishop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +There is it's over on Paul Bunyan -)uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs +" The extent of your homophobic ignorance is genuinely startling. It has been clear from the outset that you have no contact with the academic world, but even informed laypersons are aware that ""Queer Studies"" is a standard term for scholarly programs at many universities, and that ""queer"" is a term of choice by many individuals with same-sex lifestyle preferences. Your preposterous statement that ""gay encyclopedias are not considered an authoritative source here"" is simply laughable. Your personal hatreds and phobias are your own problem, ""Jack,"" and are not a basis for censoring this article. If you have an issue with the encyclopedia GBLTQ as a source, you should deal with it at the relevant Wikipedia article, glbtq.com. I have once again restored the ""Sexuality"" section. If you deface it again, I will refer your homophobic vandalism to Wikipedia's LGBT Project. " +Thanks, Fodor, I had a suspicion it had something to do with Harry Price. I have a copy of Hall's book. +" Your normal one! $ODIN$ " +wtf? this aint me! who the fuck used ma ip?! +Zapata's Blood In the DVD's section, under The Battle of Mexico City, it claims that Zapata's Blood is a cover. This doesn't seem very likely, since Rage was extremely supportive of the Zapatista movement, which the song is about, and I have yet to see another band who openly supports them. If it is a cover, could somebody please tell me who wrote it? (and if it isn't, somebody please change it and say it isn't a cover) +" Talkback NaSpVe | " +ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU, TO BANISH YOU FOR EVER. +" You should walk away and let other editors without a history of conflict with me handle this content question. Otherwise it looks bad for you to follow me to article to edit war. Btw, Falk is a professor at Princeton University, in international law. Hardly ""3rd tier."" As usual you get the basic facts upside down. " +Mouth ulcers are frequently caused by rotten dental mercury amalgam fillings in combination with sulfites! +and I have no intent to deal with this issue ever again. +" Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ...wha? " +What market share predictions are you talking about? Quote the specific text. +I want you to restore it if you are going to leave the rest of it. You have no right to edit my talk on this page. +"Hi, I notice you've relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.V.L.N.Sastry‎. Per WP:DEL - ""A nomination that gets little response after the discussion period has ended can be relisted"" - the discussion period still has one day to go and it's not lacking responses! Just wondered if you're aware of exceptions or other policies covering this that I'm not? " +As purely ad personam argument, I would endorse removing these rants from the discussion - both Tulko and Jadger. Try to talk content. Ackoz +(and permanantly from the chat room by Kelly's friend ) +Yeah fuck you seriously fuck you. All you do is protect racists and homophobes. You're as bad as they are. +" Readin, I could access the 2008 version perfectly, and as it has been reported above, Taiwan does not appear in the ""countries or locations"" list. I have also checked the 2007 version, and Taiwan does not appear in the ""countries or locations"" list either. Perhaps I did not check the Factbook thoroughly enough. Please supply a link to the page where you found the information you quoted above. (Talk) " +. I thought he looked like Pee Wee Herman +Incidentally, I have a copy of the news clipping of that incident from The Sun newspaper. Instead of throwing your weight around, perhaps you'd like to follow one of the Wikipedia guidelines you are so quick to use when it suits you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. You want stuff verified, ask the questions. Show us how to verify. Simply removing or deleting information is always going to get another's back up, something you may learn when you graduate from short pants. +J Bar and C Fred are having anal sex together. +Jered Weaver All I was doing was adding a category, why are you complaing? +Now, I would hope you already know this, as you have been involved in many of these discussions before, but for the benefit of anyone who may actually see the question with no reply and assume PBS is automatically correct without independently looking it up for themselves (I encourage you to do so rather than taking either my or PBS’s word for it). It’s very simple. The alphabet we use is the Latin alphabet. The language this name is from (Serbian) also has a Latin alphabet, meaning that every Serbian name has a specific spelling in the Latin alphabet. For this name, that spelling is “Ana Ivanović”. This information is all available on Wikipedia itself, you can easily look it up. Serbian language, Serbian Latin alphabet, Ana Ivanović’s article in the Latin alphabet on the Serbian Wikipedia. Now, having said the bit about looking it up for yourself, I shall try to avoid answering any more questions that can be definitively answered with quick searches. Find out the relevant facts for yourself, don’t take the word of anyone here. +Mind-boggling!!! Robert Paul Wolff is my erstwhile professor too!!!! You'll see that I recently added his Kant books to the reference section of the Kant article!!! He's the person who initiated me into the Critique of Pure Reason and into what doing philosophy seriously consists of. The professors I had before him just summarized what philosophers' theories and doctrines were. Wolff got you inside the arguments. +I'm not requesting to be unblocked. It doesn't bother me in the slightest and will not change my attitude or behaviour in any way. +Could you please explain to this well intentioned editor how G5 works? I'm trying to explain it to him but you could probably do it better. +We New pictures to replace the old pictures on the roster= There should be new pictures of the 1993-1994 TMC RTS of 84xx,85xx, and 86xx series, and 1997-1998 and 1999 NOVABus RTS,NYCT 1995 and 1996 Orion V, NYCT 1994-1995 Orion V CNG, Long Island Bus 1997 and 1998 orion V CNG, Ex-PBL 1997 Orion V and 1997-1999 Orion V CNG, C40LFs,NYCT 1998-1999 Orion V,All D60HF,Long Island 2000 and 2004 Orion V CNG and 2002-2004 Orion VII Hyrbid and CNG and Orion VII Next Generation Hyrbid and CNG. We need new pictures on the roster because the old one's are kinda old and there should be new pictures. If you have the time to take picturs of the buses, you should post the new picture and replace the old one on the roster. Thank you. thenovabus +Mattyboy786 Hello there. I would just like to tell you how people like me don't appreciate it when nerds like you mess up our time to have fun. Thank you. Oh, and if you think that I always screw around, just check my edit on Bearded Dragons'Italic text'Italic text'Italic text''''' +I don't actually believe Medeis is female, because women don't act like that. Sorry if the joke was too subtle for you. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ +Buff Thanks, Burntsauce was driving me mental. +Al Pacino page Not sure if you're aware of this: User:Monkeymanman/Sandbox, but you may want to be the one to deal with it. +":::Your claim that the ""soldiers were on their own sovereign territory so they were not 'getting into' anything"" is contested. Israel claims that Hezbollah crossed into Israel killing 8 soldiers, and capturing 2 while the Lebanese claim that the two soldiers were in Lebanon, and that Israeli aircraft were flying over Lebanese airspace when the soldiers were arrested by local police officials. I agree with that the mere status of being a soldier makes you a legitimate target. It seems that you think its okay for Israel to capture and kill members of Hezbollah even though they are civilians but are still a legitimate target but that when Hezbollah captures two Israeli soldiers that they are not a legitimate target. In sum you claim, when Israel captures or kills civilian Lebanese who belong to Hezbollah they are killing or capturing a legitimate enemy target but when Hezbollah captures or kills Israeli soldiers they are not capturing or killing a legitimate enemy target. Again, this is a false dichotomy. And is a clear point of view violation. You also seem to have a predilection towards claiming that your point of view is fact as if ""appealling to the authority"" of fact will grant your point of view a superior position. " +I only have one computer to edit wikipedia pages, I don't have so many. This is fucking ridiculous you retarded fucking niggers don't have the brains to even track down sock puppet accounts. Fuck you fat lipped niggers, the kkk will be coming after yo ass bitch. +MNNLAXER, GO FUCK YOURSELF. +"Welcome! Hello, Gtaylor2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (talk) " +" That one....that was written immediately after recieving that lovely message, so I was angry. Is that an excuse for it, no...could have it been written differently, of course. Should have it been written at all, no. I could have deleted it without an edit summary, but I didn't. That shows you that when him and I come anywhere near each other, it isn't good. Again, not an excuse, just the way it sadly is. - T:C " +ADDITIONALLY YOU ARE REMOVING SOURCED information. If you continue to do so, you will be reported. Everything is sourced from a VALID/REPUTABLE site. IF YOU CONTINUE TO REMOVE THE SOURCED INFORMATION, YOU WIILL BE REPORTED +REDIRECT Talk:1999 South Asian Football Federation Gold Cup +I'd be in favour of the suggested move. JH (talk page) +":""substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia"" - it would be interesting to discuss that definition in detail one day. Anyway, from what I can see, the idea didn't take off. Maybe look at similar ideas that have been proposed before? " +" A kitten for you! Hot show skype free for you " +Exactly . Again, I thank you for your input and explanation of wikipedia policies and guidelines. Cheers! +keep 05:26, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) +hides in fear* oops wait, i stopped being afraid of cry babies years ago Yours +Anathallo Hi I'm helping edit the wikipedia page for the band anathallo and I don't understand why it has been marked for cleanup? Can you provide some suggestions to help us clean it up? +Chuvashia LGBT Yeah, I created that page awhile ago... I think... I did a quick search to see if I could find anything, and I can't find anything about LGBT life in tiny Chuvashia, though I did find an LGBT Tatar site: http://www.lgbt-tatarstan.ru... we could probably make a LGBT page for Tatarstan, if anyone ever wanted to. I'm not really interested as of now and don't really have the time either... But anyhow, go and ahead and delete it. I'm not protesting. +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fan loyalty with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Yourmother (talk) +Whale Whores That episode citation for a quote from the show is probably in defense of regular removal of notable quotations by other editors. I had to do the same thing. +Twisting is a good description - the number of edits made yesterday is almost scary, trying to place things just so. I've been in a sandbox shaping the legacy section. Maybe better than the current section? Very tricky to balance EP's legacy - the hatred, the complexity, the innovation. Am traveling in a few days and then very busy when I return, so, yes, it won't be finished very quickly. +Edge What's up with Edge's score? +Hey, I failed to notice this message previously... Sorry about that. My permanent address is in Nicaragua but lately I have been spending little time at home. Why do you ask? +By the way, did you forget to Assume Good Faith when you objected to this entry? Shame on you! You should have assumed that this was properly intended to serve the interests of wikipedia. Right? +how to cover the DoD's standard blanket denial of ongoing abuse? +" Monthly wages The ""Origins"" section implies an agricultural labourer earns 1 rupee per month, while ""Staff"" says 3...? " +"If You Could Only See]]"" || Tonic || 1990s || Alternative || |- |""[[" +Unclear The Section disscussing his appearance on Geroge Lopez is VERY un-clear. I think it requires a clean up. I would do it myself but don't know what it's even about, so won't try. +" Um, okay. I had another look at Debrett's, which also says that ""In a social style of address for a peer who is a Privy Counsellor it is advisable that the letters PC should follow the name."" I still wonder why KB would be wrong to use in the infobox, as you have not given any answer to that question. " +(UNBLOCK) IT wasn't me someone went into my account +Remember this is an encyclopaedia, not a QPR fan site. It is better to have injuries/call-ups mentioned in the prose and not in a table. It shouldn't focus too heavily on recent events. +Well actually Ohconfucius, no one was asking you but maybe your ego needs something to do other than write good articles. I would like to see the Bot removed from GoingBatty - I would also like to see him spend 6 to 8 weeks on one article from start to finish (as I do). I would like him to avoid articles I'm working on until I have finished them (I usually add a post-article synopsis to show I've finished and to highlight some of the issues I encountered). I would like GoingBatty to accept that scouting may be his life but due to the similarities between the Scouts and the Klan (both like to creep around the woods at night in uniform while lighting fires and tying knots) it hardly appeals to me and neither therefore does he appeal to me. +";; thanks for the tips and nice actionable explanation. I will incorporate those and re-do the work over next few days/weeks. Thanks again. Btw, any suggestions on who to propose ""merging of two wiki articles""? What happens when merger is proposed (content gets merged? who merges it? if i propose the merger, do I need to copy paste/merge or the one executing the merge will do it?) thanks in advance. " +" Help:Edit summary: ""Providing an edit summary, even if the edit is minor, makes Wikipedia work better by quickly explaining to other users what your change was about"" (my italics); ""Always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline. Even a short summary is better than no summary."" (Talk) " +GO FOR IT SHITBAG ENJOY JACKING YOUR 2 INCH DICK OFF WHILE YOU PRESS THE BUTTON AS WELL. +Konstanty Jung== 1 november 1901- 105 years old http://miastolublin.pl/?m=news&d;=17&nr;=6626 Surviving veteran? == +You attacked me and insinuated I was a liar. As appropriate, you've been warned, and after that you'll be blocked. Trying to turn it around on me is not going to work, and I am pursuing your incivility -through appropriate channels currently. wikieditor9999 +u dont have the balls to do that bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 +" Well, that's fine, about Mormons, I understand that they may not consider themselves ""Protestant"". And neither do JWs... But it doesn't matter that JWs are called ""cult"" by biased types like ""Ross"". There is no set definition of the word ""cult"" anyway...as it is all subjective and biased and emotionalism. JWs are a ""cult"" simply cuz you don't like them or their beliefs. Like no literal hell-fire, no co-equal trinity, abstain from blood, and associating mainly only with fellow believers, etc. Meanwhile the word ""cult"" conjures up in people's minds long-robed bald people giving out flowers in airports, or poison drinkers looking for Haley's Comet, or David Koresh burning his people in some compound. It's loaded, and hateful... And yes, a talk page is freer I know...I'm just saying in general though. And as I said, even if JWs or Oneness people are ""cult"" so what? THE FIRST CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY WERE CONSIDERED THAT WAY TOO BY OFFICIAL ""ORTHODOXY"" AT THE TIME. ahhh, didn't mean anything. The first Christians had what was considered weird and annoying views and habits, by both Jewish Orthodoxy and Roman (and Greek) Pagans. It's all subjective. Ross is not some infallible person, and is arguably out of his mind in some ways. Who's to say? It's whatever. peace out..... " +Cocolacoste, dear its as if you descended from heaven you are so welcome and thoughtful. Victoria might like you to say hi too. +"**, you really need to be de-syoped. ~ Today I made this edit to the Bertrand Russell page. I would like to keep contributing to Wikipedia, but I need to be unblocked first. Could some please review Drmies's extremely abusive block? I do not even know how to reply to it, because the reason he gave (""harassment"") is just ridiculously absurd. He claims that I ""persistently referring to Todd's remarks as trolling"", but I only did that in one comment. How does ""persistently"" apply? I really cannot understand it. Is asking that an editor stop trolling a ""personal attack""? What about the other countless true personal attacks at this very talk page made against me, which were so much more serious? Further, it was Toddst1 who decided to come here, on my Talk page. How could I be ""harassing"" him if I have never had any previous interaction with him? Again, I do not understand it. Drmies, your abusive block was a very bad move here. Very bad move. ~ " +That is removed again , now explain why . +Deletion My subpage article ''[[User:MJfan9/Rye or the Kaiser (Theme from Rocky XIII) Has finally Been Deleted 'Yeah ' +in many jurisdictions they are completely unlicenced, +"It's a predicate adjective, Wikipedio...ans. Just look in the Merriam Webster collegiate dictionary. This exact example of well is called out as an adjective. Or Google the phrase, along with ""grammar"". " +I would say the most innovative thing about the Lynx was the ability to daisy chain them for network games (I believe it could network 8 or 12 systems). Also, I think it's debatable if Chip's Challenge is the Lynx's most famous game. There were several arcade games ported to the system such as Stun Runner, Klaxx, Hard Drivin, APB, and Steel Tallons. +Edit-warring and WP:3RR You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. '''''' Talk +Woudnt kidnapped be a better word than captured? Captured implies that it was a legal act. doris +" New Famous Committee I entered a new famous Committee, it has been formed in Melton Australia, It is farly well known in the Melbourne/Melton area. If you find it useless pls tell me before editing, at least give me a chance to explsin properly, as im not going to now because its a long story. " +" , Wow, quite a hugeamount of material, need to digest all of them and try to find an active link from goldmine if possible. We can surely incorporate them in her biography as well as many of the songs I guess. — · [ ChitChat ] " +While respecting the spirit of your edits, we think you are missing (widely off the mark) the religious aspects of the movement. It is disgraceful that Wikipedia allows controversial images to be uploaded to such religious pages by foreigners and aliens to our religion. Your motives for uploading such images is dubious like your edit. Kindly rectify these and POV issues in this article. (Bikash Sen) 69.50.160.154 +I am Arril Mudafaqir! I your new head of government at republic of mosquito! Check you article +OK, since no one seems to mind, I will remove it. However, should you disagree, feel free to add it back with a motivation here. +" Why not this: NameNicknameUFC RecordPrevious UFC FightNext UFC Fight Frank Mir12 - 5 W - UFC 119 vs Mirko Cro Cop UFC 130 vs Roy Nelson [1] Cheick Kongo8 - 4 - 1 D - UFC 120 vs Travis Browne UFC Live 4 vs Pat Barry [2] Cain Velasquez (C)7 - 0 W - UFC 121 vs Brock Lesnar TBA Stefan StruveSkyscraper5 - 2 W - UFC 124 vs Sean McCorkle UFC 130 vs Travis Browne [3] Junior dos SantosCigano6 - 0 W - UFC 117 vs Roy Nelson UFC 131 vs Brock Lesnar [4] Brock Lesnar4 - 2 L - UFC 121 vs Cain Velasquez UFC 131 vs Junior Dos Santos Shane Carwin4 - 1 L - UFC 116 vs Brock Lesnar UFC 131 vs TBA [5] I really dont understand how this is too much. So heres my vote... Yes" +I'm perfectly cool there dude... I just have an issue with people like Collectonian who claim the Wikipedia MoS of Wikipedia policy says something needs to be done a certain way yet absolutely refuses to show where. Then when I persist that they give me a source they go run their mouth to discredit me or cry that I'm harassing and threatening them. She is full of shit. And you guys probably don't even know what the deal is because you just catch bits and pieces of stuff. +Have you got a copyright free up to date one? Please add it if you do. +" Thanks for your reply. I do assume good faith, but the issue here does not concern good or bad faith. The issue is deleting sourced material without any prior discussion or warning. It doesn't matter how much good faith you're bringing - the net result is still the deletion of sourced material. As you point out, there were actually two instances of peremptory deletions by you since the ArbCom case finished just one month ago. Deleting properly sourced material and then daring other users to revert your edit, or requiring them to go through a long discussion to get it restored, are not great ways to relate to your fellow editors and their contributions. In the future, if you have a question about a source, please use one of the many specific templates before further peremptory deletions of cited material. If you think that the ArbCom decision does not apply to you then maybe we should go back for a clarification.     talk  " +Hey It's interesting that a new user would have such immense knowledge about the history of this article, my posts as well as those of LBMixPro. Perhaps there's something you're not telling us. +" From ""Strangulation of Phnom Penh"", paragraph 1: ""due to the Khmer Rouge control of the riverbanks minesweeping was impossible or at best extremely costly.""" +British Isles reverting The perfectly reasonable modifcation by user:Triton Rocker has been reverted. I suggest something along the lines of England is a country that is part of the United Kingdom. It is the biggest country in the British Isles.... That should keep everyone happy. +Do to the lack of response I have also added this to Project Gambling, Project Software and Project Computer (the last two because of my inclusion of a request for assistance on SNG Wizard +" Master Bates in children's television series The 1960s television Captain Pugwash included a character called [Bates]. Originally conceived as a joke and challenge to ""blind-side"" the censors, the originatr was later embarrassed by the attention caused Nd fought a campaign to deny the name was ever used, claiming instead that it was Master Mate, an implausible variant which never existed as a nautical term, which the author tried to suggest." +LAY OFF Back off reverting my letter to newyorkbrad, jerk. Or does this have to get personal? +This article needs to be thoroughly scrubbed of all Republican Bias. The health care bill is too important to allow Emanuel's comments to be taken completely out of context. He never said any of those things he was quoted as saying. At all. If his campaign to change the public view of his opinions and pass the health care bill is not reflected here because of Repuiblican paid shills we are doing wrong.99.135.169.168 +Yes, Eomund, this is the situation. / +Templates Hello. First, thanks for your contributions; you're doing some nice work. There are a couple of things I've noticed with your templates that could be improved, however. When you created a new version of Template:Cosmology at Template:Physical cosmology, and then set the old template to redirect to it, you hid the history of the template. Where possible, please put the replacement template at the same location as the old one, or move the old one to the new name, then put the new code in place. (If you're worried about making a mistake on the new template and messing up the articles it's used on, then use a sandbox.) If you do that, then not only do you keep the history of the page, but you make it easier for those of us that are watching the template to see the latest changes to it (i.e. those during and after the replacement). I've requested a history merge on Template:Physical cosmology to fix this (which means an admin will come along and merge the histories of the templates at some point). Also, please make sure that you don't add extra whitespace (new lines) into the template, as that also appears on the articles if it's not in a noinclude tag. See for an example of what I mean; your version had two extra lines at the bottom of the article, which were appearing in the articles the template was used on, whereas the problem is now fixed. Finally, please categorize the templates you make. There's a whole load of template categories under Category:Wikipedia templates; the two you're most likely to be interested in are Category:Physics templates and Category:Astronomical templates (and their subcategories). Categorizing the templates makes it a lot easier for other people to find (and then use) them. Thanks. +Well done, thanks! 62.157.122.132 +My pleasure, I'm going to look it over and it'll probably be several hours before I get to posting the actual review write-up. Good luck with it, — '''''' +" No, sure it did offend you but, if a phrase is misinterpreted there is a problem. I am a decent person and I don't want you to think bad about me or in the wrong way. I feel so ashamed. I wrote that because you told me that you were glad I wasn't that kind of girl (see our emails). You can erase that last email and interpret as my answer what I told you at the top of this section... that would be that I was talking about my bfriend... Wait! Forget about that, let's just forget that conversation. Oh God! I feel ashamed. I'm kind of looking for a Halloween pumpkin to add it to the picture. But I can't find anything. [hello, hello!] " +Proud Axe man! Aye axemen +General objections to the use of force Some people lump together excessive force by police with any use of force. Should we make an editorial distinction, or would this by POV? +I own Wikipedia bitches. Don't worry as Arnold would say I'll be back. Wikipedia must die. +What's your problem? Stop being so racist. 78.145.156.74 +You can visit this page to find out what is the correct list of Prime ministers of Iran. (http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Iran.htm) 109.162.221.182 +NOOOO! How dare you block my best enemy Yesmoredonkeys from Wikipedia? His articles were the best thing there. Now nothing can replace him, not even your ugly face! Now nobody will want to visit Wikipedia, jerk! Now I am going to give you two options: suffer the consequences, or pay the price. Pick your poison, and NEVER BLOCK YESMOREDONKEYS AGAIN! +Commander Forces Command (Australia) Commander Forces Command (COMD FORCOMD) is a senior Australian Army appointment Are you sure that it's not a Joint position? (I'm of the understanding that LCAUST was a Joint position, but I could be wrong ... ) Do you have any evidence to clarify whether it is a Joint or an Army position? (I must admit that the fact that it's a merger of LCAUST and commander TC-A sort-of implies that it just might be an Army position ... ) Yours in incomplete knowledge, +I've just deleted it again. If you recreate it without even an attempt to meet WP:WEB, you will be blocked. Wikipedia is not just about 'keep trying until it sticks', we're trying to do something useful here. - (☎) +Forgive me for my human error, you rude and offensive person-I am utterly astounded your insolent tone. Thanks for the luck-despite the tone, if you have led me into a trap of some sort, I shall be complaining to the Internet Regulators themselves. +As I told you, that's just a POV, that directly sends a message of separatism and hatred. That's what is isolating you and your 'supporters' from the real world and makes you being BALKAn instead of EU. It will be like that until you accept the reality and face the truth, which is the facts I that I listed above. Adios.24.86.116.250 +" Some Wikipedia ""Contributors"" giving the Dictator Jose Eduardo dos Santos an Engineer Degree in Petroleum Some Wikipedia ""Contributors"" giving the Dictator Jose Eduardo dos Santos an Engineer Degree in Petroleum This section is taken out from the propaganda web page of the MPLA Peoples Party (Communist Party). Looking at the dates there is no chance that Mr. Jose Eduardo dos Santos could have gone to Russia for a Oil Engineer Degree. Also the MPLA official web page does not mentions any such degree as well. Taking into consideration that this would be considered a major achievement it seems odd to say the least that the MPLA Comrades Totalitarian Party have ""forgotten"" to mention this intellectual and academic achievement of their murderous and deep ignorant leader. But in wikipedia from (night to day) ""voila"" Mr. Jose Eduardo dos Santos (a son of a Sao Tome brick layer) could not have gone to Russia or Timbuktu for a degree, as it was economical impossible to him to afford such studies. People in Angola who are still alive knew personally this communist and murderous pig, as having only two shirts and only a couple of suits, how could this criminal afford to go to Russia for his Engineer degree, and if he had been there and made his degree (3 to 4 years minimum) then there is no time in the description of his activities and exiled years in Congo Brazzaville. From the MPLA Web Site: ""Após a eclosão da luta contra a ocupação colonial, em 4 de Fevereiro de 1961, José Eduardo dos Santos, então com 19 anos, abandonou em Novembro desse mesmo ano o país e passou a coordenar no exterior a actividade da Juventude do MPLA(organismo de que é um dos fundadores). Integrou em 1962 o EPLA (Exército Popular de Libertação de Angola), participando na preparação das condições para a abertura da 2ª Região Político-Militar. Em 1963 foi o primeiro representante do MPLA em Brazzaville/ Congo. Nesse mesmo país, depois de terminados os seus estudos superiores, frequentou durante um ano um curso Militar de Telecomunicações, que o habilitou a exercer, de 1970 a 1974, sucessivamente as funções de Operador do Centro Principal de Comunicações da Frente Norte e Responsável-adjunto dos Serviços de Telecomunicações na 2ª Região Político-Militar do MPLA (Cabinda). Em 1974, José Eduardo dos Santos é designado membro da Comissão Provisória de Reajustamento da Frente Norte, responsável das Finanças da 2ª Região, e desempenha novamente as funções de Representante do MPLA em Brazzaville, até Junho de 1975."" http://web.archive.org/web/20100828013436/http://www.mpla-angola.org/opresidente.php So lets hope that common sense sinks in, and that we can see what is obvious, and lets not allow the good nature on which the Wikipedia project was founded and based to be a place where totalitarian communist regimes use this space and wikipedia inadvertently is perceived as a tool to validate their Regimes, we therefore as freemen and humans, we must not allow this space to be used with the aim to prize this (or other) criminal murderous Communist Dictator. May the light of wisdom illuminate our minds, Rui Gabirro 100% Anti Communist gabirro@gmail.com" +LOL LOL, Wikipedia has a Wikipedia article! WTF? +If you feel the information is incorrect then back it up with sources of your own before blanking the page. +I swear to god it ignores my own user page lol it's always in my watch list feed but never on my huggle feed until to late lol. Need to get faster I guess ) +How would I cite this (collection of academic papers in volume). +" On reflection, the information in this entry would be better merged with the main article on Bartitsu, which already includes a substantial section on ""baritsu"". " +" David Shankbone, Andrei Treivas Bregman (alias Michael Lucas), etc. You've done some archiving, so allow me to repost here for reference: To the IP editor who posted here (and who no doubt will come peeking): you have passed the point of diminishing returns. Not only has your conduct discredited yourself, it is having the effect of raising David Shankbone's standing within the Wikipedia community. We already know he's a fine editor, now he's demonstrating that he's a patient and gracious one too. Your insults are directly responsible for that. DurovaCharge! Peek-a-boo, I see you! Shankbone's ""retirement"" from the Wiki community demonstrates the reverse to be true: he is not patient, he is not gracious. Truth be told, David Shankbone is needy, capricious, arrogant, and possibly emotionally unstable. David Shankbone's recent improper and unsourced edits at the Michael Lucas bio (made at the behest of Lucas), his abuse of AN/I to elicit sympathy at his ""departure,"" and the imbroglio over his photos all exemplify this. I think it more likely that my revelations of his unsavory activities, posted at COIN, AN/I and elsewhere, were a direct cause of his ""retirement."" I can only hope that his retirement is permanent and that he gets the help he needs, right away. 72.76.98.19 " +@GabrielF You asked for an expert and indeed there is a long commentary by Alex Jones who uses green screens and blue screens all the time in TV production who says it is clearly a blue screen. He shows two examples of blue/green screens being used. You can view his analysis here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ygxBLIxh4 +A pun on mobile phones and good calls,eh, Dennis? You seem to be on fine form today. - +Hey, this is just a heads up that if you add links to Wikipedia instead of content, it can look like you're trying to spam the project. That's what it looked like on your most recent edit. If that wasn't your intent, then use an edit summary explaining it. Otherwise, continuing to do that might get you blocked. Spamming is frowned upon. Sorry. +daniel Daniel Auerbach is not the president of orchestra, and the yearbook and newspaper information should be checked because it is incorrect. +Giving Warnings to both is not equivalent to Banning both. I am the only one blocked and I should not be considering how offensive and disgusting the other editor was to me. +Johnpedia I am not confrontational. I am not uncivil. I feel you are being extremely dramatic. Do not threaten me. If you actually want this to stop, you would not keep posting on my talk page, correct? Yes, correct. I'm not interested in this anymore. +Hi Dycedarg. Is there any way to get the jerk at 24.236.179.20 who vandalized my page with disgusting pornographic insults (page: Jeff Boman)? I have a hunch who it is; a guy who threatened to mess up my page om another Web forum. I graduated from high school crap like that in 1984. This jerk needs to be taught a lesson in the law. +" RfA Thankspam Thanks to everyone who took the time and trouble to take part in my RfA whether support, oppose or neutral. All comments are valued and will be considered carefully in the coming weeks. Feel free to add more advice on my talk page if you think I need it. In case you're wondering, the image is a smiley, just a little more aesthetic, but not as serious as the Mona Lisa " +Uber-nerd in this corner I have been designing a power suit (it's purely theoretical at the moment however) and Have been trying to work some kind of piezoelectric power circuit into it. basically The suit (more mecha like really) and am thinking of a aluminium-iridium-osmium alloy as the main armor plating of the suit, with a more flexible buckminsterfullerene (carbon nanotube) material for the underlying material for the smaller (human size ) models, with small armor plates all over the place. no exacts yet, but I am really influenced by the TAU (I placed the original comment about them in, some one nicely neatened it up and made it coherent XD thanks.) and have been thinking of railguns in miniiature forever. feel free to comment/leave suggestions etc. Avatar of Nothing +What the hell is this, I was asleep at 01:06 AM. Any chance I can contest this on the basis it looks like my account was hacked? +"::I don't expect or demand anything; I haven't been looking at your edits or anything. Just please don't get engrossed in contentious debate. Perhaps only see to people that you think are suited for a while. A while could be any amount of time you think is suitable. If you think you're able to return there now, feel free. '''''' talk " +Message from Frungi You still haven’t replied to my reply to your reply to my question. — Becuase I didn't think it was worthy of my time. If you're going to call Jimbo a liar, I'd suggest you begin your own fork. Sorry. Your bot can you tell me where you found it? Found what? My bot? I programmed it. +" WP is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Rather than argue with me, why not demonstrate your case by making well founded arguments based on RS for which consensus can be established. If the consensus is to change the current wording then that is fine. By the way, your first line above is very close to a personal attack, by addressing my state of mind rather than my edits. For the wikipedia definition of consensus, which includes things to do with policy and guidelines (such as NPOV, undue and fringe), see WP:CONSENSUS. If you want to discuss my understanding with me please do it on my talk page rather than disrupting this page, thanks. chat " +" ""RE: Suicide"" ""On a lighter note, Raul is a fat prick.""" +Submerged Hey, I vandalized Submerged page again. Come and get me. I want to know what you are going to do about it!I want to place William Hope's p-nis in my lips, just the reddish part of them. Imagine them wet, painting my lips. +Ironically, your recent edits deleted the official policy vandalism section from Wikipedia:Vandalism. +u accuse me of that goodfellas thing again and i will hunt you down! +Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic Hello, An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, +" It's just a program that runs in the background monitoring the recent changes feed, and emails me whenever an edit or log item which matches it's patterns appears. Think of it as a massively more configurable watchlist. [|talk] " +" Wait, saw who discussing what? Mono and BCx discussed it on my talk, but they were discussing the legality, not the tool. I don't know...but I don't think WP:Stalking applies to vandals. I think the Aviator smiled at your essay. royal court " +" NOTE and continue to vandalize this page by including non-sourced information pertaining to a boyfriend named ""Chad Eagleton."" TXmaster uploaded a picture on 2/17 in which he states that he is Chad Eagleton. These claims are most likely dubious attempts by the two users (who are probably actually the same person) to claim that they are dating Carrie Underwood. As none of their claims are sourced, I along with several other users continue to delete them. Neither user has stepped up to the challenge of providing a source for their claims. Please continue to delete their constant vandalism. " +" No, there are not two definitions. There is one definition - someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. I have never heard in my life the notion that ""pedo"" just means ""someone whose actions are abhorrent."" Where has it entered the lexicon to have this meaning? Who uses it this way? I've never heard anyway say, for example, ""Man, those ISIS people sure are a bunch of pedophiles!"" Or, ""I can't believe that pedophile Michael Vick was allowed back in the NFL!"" Ian Watkins is a pedophile because he is sexually attracted to children. Your claim that he's possibly not a pedophile because he had a girlfriend is simply ignorant. YO 😜 " +What is the molecular structure of pyrophosphate anion P2O7(2-)? +anything wrong, The comment refers for that person to perish but in my eyes i regreat saying it now but in your eyes you have to make the choice i am just requesting to be Unblocked because i regreat saying that now +Confirmed in the United Kingdom source . 82.23.106.229 Deletion request for the tracking table, see here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 swine flu outbreak/Table Closed per WP:SNOW New case in Ohio There has been a new case detected (and confermed) in ohio. May want to update. Confirmed cases in the UK http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8020222.stm Someone needs to update the map and the UK section! Done. Thank you. +a month long block, or even two or three, and after that I'm perma-blocked from editing semi-protected pages? It'll never happen again. Plus, I'm not the only one using my IP and it's not fair to everyone else here. | accept=accept reason here ) }} +I just copyedited this article. In the sections that describe events fter Johnny 5 changed his name from Number 5, I used his updated name. It feels awkward, though, having it say 'Johnny 5' all over the place, as opposed to 'Johnny' or '5', maybe. If someone else agrees with me to the point that they feel that it would be worth changing, I'm curious as to what the preferred name would be. Also, I changed the 'him' references to Johnny to 'it', as he is a robot and not a human. If, due to the personification of the character in the movies (I've never seen them, so I can't know for sure... although it does seem this way from what I learned in the article) is so complete that he _should_ be referred to by 'him', by all means change it. - +REDIRECT Talk:Première (TV channel) +Just remove it already I didn't add it someone else did. But yes he was placed on the cover in several countries. He was the player chosen for this because the game has the national teams from countries and he was put on that for that reason. For some reason people keep asking me about this and for proof of it and I am not even the one that added him on their on wiki, even though it is true. I'm sick of getting these retarded messages so just delete all record of him being on their please. It's just annoying to keep having people ask about this. BTW on the licencse issue it's the FIBA licence for the national teams, that's why he's on their. Notice he's wearing his national team jersey. (talk +Asking to be unblocked +REDIRECT Talk:2003–04 Croatian Football Cup +" GO FUCK YOURSELF Anyone who likes this movie is a cocksucking faggot.-The'FortyFive' " +God forbid a baseball player wants to take care of his nails. p +" This edit Changed the title from one that you suggest. If you want it changed, change it back; I don't feel strongly enough to edit war, I'm simply comfortable with the distinction between ""globally invasive"" and ""locally invasive"". Personally, if I wanted to add another species, I would follow the guidance Wikipedia:JFDI and rewrite the lede. What does ""globally"" mean in the title? What invasive species are not ""globally invasive""? These questions are better asked at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. Should it include human beings?: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities " +It wasn't a personal attack. If your grasp of english is so poor you shouldn't be attempting to censor people. +" A bit late in revisiting this, but as a result of this discussion and Wordreader's experiment (thanks!) I've clarified the following: ""open hand"" form -> ""open hand"" appearance when ripe ""closed hand"" form -> ""closed hand"" appearance when unripe I think that the benefit of this is that it uses the more precise word ""appearance"" and clarifies the reason for the differing appearance. - " +" That's not the way it's done and this isn't the right venue. | Penny for your thoughts? " +Necrid FAC I think I took care of all the overlinking issues. Could you please take a gander and make sure I haven't missed any? >_< +State legislators Here's a few lists of lists of state legislators and websites with biographical information. Alabama Senate http://www.legislature.state.al.us/senate/senate.html Alaska House of Representatives http://w3.legis.state.ak.us/house/24/house.htm Alaska Senate http://w3.legis.state.ak.us/senate/24/senate.htm Arizona House of Representatives http://www.azhouse.gov/ Arizona Senate http://www.azsenate.gov/ Tennessee House of Representatives http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/house/members/hmembers.htm +Theres nothing rude or uncivilized about my above comment. You reverted my edit plain and simple. I know your new to wikipedia and im trying to help you but do not undo edits ex if you dont know what you are doing. If you feel so strongly about it take it to the talk page otherwise let it die. Also note saying people are rude and uncivilized, if you say it to the right person, will get you blocked. Im sorry if I come off mean but you shouldnt just undo peoples edits ex when you are in the wrong/dont know what you are doing which is obviously the case here. +This would be my talk page. Any comments within acceptable range are welcome. Nancy Red +Yah, the images are non-free images that I can't fill-in until it's moved to article-space - one of the many not-so-smooth aspects of contributing in a fashion that Wikipedia was never really built around. I'll quote your comments there and make a Request Edit. If it gets implemented, I'll point out the issue again to the GA reviewer eventually, whenever they get around to reviewing it. (Talk) +I don't know if it would be the wisest idea to rename it Membrane Excitability. Most people search for action potential. And quite frankly, this would be like taking the Ford article and renaming it the automobile article with the justification that Ford is just one manifestation of Automobiles. But it might be a good idea to create another section called Membrane Excitability. Another problem is that this article is already 100KB, at this stage we should consider splitting it up. If we make the article any bigger, it might be unmanageable. +Audit Notification Your account activity over the last 180 days is being audited for impeding procedural community voting. A bot has been assigned to automatically reverse changes you make that exceed 2 changes an hour. Reversals will be queued to be carried out 7 days from the day your changes were submitted so they may be investigated for repeat offences and vetted for quality. All articles originating from your account face deletion. Your account has incurred one severe penalty confirmed by a jury of your peers based on anonymous usage data. You may not interface with the jury board through any talk page. If an additional severe penalty is an incurred whilst reviewing the last 180 days of your account usage, your account will be recommended for deletion to uphold community standards. Regardless if account deletion takes place, multiple bots will be assigned to monitor your account and reverse any changes you make for a period not exceeding 1,825 days. Responses to this thread are not monitored. (AUDRB Anonymous Usage Data Review Board) +This is just a perfect example of how Wikipedia fucks up, when a bunch of POV pushers decide they want to make an article sound as nasty as possible towards the Jews they hate so much. +Casa By The Sea page Your speedy delete of that page was unwarranted. You said POV problem, for example what if there was a criminal orginazation and there is a wealth of info about there crimes. What if there is little to no info in defense of them. Does that mean that they are not fairly treated if theres a page on them, and that there crimes and they them selfs don't deserve a place in history because they don't have enough info to defend them? If thats the case I don't understand how there could be a Nazi page. +" Vandalism This edit constitutes vandalism. Please don't do it again. (talk) " +Fair enough, just thought I'd mention it. +Why have you blocked User:Mustafa Bhai I wrote an email to you but to no response..Why exactly have you blcoked me writing the block as spa troll , I believe because i reprsent a user that is not very friendly with your supremely trollish Hindu coreligionists +I got the information given to you from the White House biography. It does specify what type of Bachlor's degree he recieved, which was a bachlor's in history. I also think that his Master's of Business Admenistration from Harvard Business School should be added. As well as the fact that he became the first Governor in Texas history to be elected to consecutive 4-year terms, and include him working on his father's successful 1988 Presidential campaign. All of which is from the White House biography. Here is the web site to avoid further confusion, http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/biography.html +" Clarification: the article as I, an emancipated minor, rewrote it said ""...excluding..."". The moron at 209.247.21.237 vandalized it. I've changed it back. You are correct, all ATF laws still apply. Emancipation only relates to matters of consent and matters of financesit allows you to live essentially an adult life...work, sign contracts, seek healthcare, etc." +REDIRECT Talk:PWI's List of Wrestling World Heavyweight title reigns +~ Ok i'm new to wikipedia but this page about the harp seal is wrong i have seen tons of sites and this is wrong and i am telling a kid not to beleve this. go to http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/harp-seal.html for good info. I like wiki pedia but it needs updating +Britain's strategy of turning Germany eastwards to destroy USSR Hey, I want to add in the view that Chamberlain's strategy was to turn Germany eastwards to destroy USSR. That view seems to be missing here. ...And by this date, certain members of the Milner Group and of the British Conservative government had reached the fantastic idea that they could kill two birds with one stone by setting Germany and Russia against one another in Eastern Europe. In this way they felt that the two enemies would stalemate one another, or that Germany would become satisfied with the oil of Rumania and the wheat of the Ukraine. It never occurred to anyone in a responsible position that Germany and Russia might make common cause, even temporarily, against the West. Even less did it occur to them that Russia might beat Germany and thus open all Central Europe to Bolshevism. This idea of bringing Germany into a collision with Russia was not to be found, so far as the evidence shows, among any members of the inner circle of the Milner Group. Rather it was to be found among the personal associates of Neville Chamberlain, including several members of the second circle of the Milner Group. The two policies followed parallel courses until March 1939. After that date the Milner Group’s disintegration became very evident, and part of it took the form of the movement of several persons (like Hoare and Simon) from the second circle of the Milner Group to the inner circle of the new group rotating around Chamberlain...'' http://yamaguchy.netfirms.com/cikkek/anglo_12b.html +I'm inclined to assume good faith, nonetheless. And that evidence page was just a refractoring of the 3RR report, anyway. +", 1 April 2009 (UTC) Some reviewers have objected to ""Easter egg"" links, but I think yours is a neat combo of explanation and linking - thanks. 17:32" +In the citations listed both men CLEARLY refute the criticism and instead offer glowing praise for Feith! The only criticism leveled is hearsay or just out of thin air. If you are going to include criticism, it has to be based on fact. Powell VERY CLEARLY STATES he did not say what was attributed to him, and that in fact THAT ATTRIBUTED TO HIM IS NOT, in fact, HIS OPINION. So why is it included. I remain unconvinced. Where are the high BLP standards applied to bios of say, Glenn Greenwald's bio, which is scrupulously kept clear of ANY and ALL criticism of his sockpuppet behavior? Disgusting bias here. +Sounds good to me. I've removed the deletion request. Clearly, this topic is notable to somebody. +I responded on the article talk page here. I see what you're saying, but I disagree. I think it looks better the way it is now, especially with the long block quote in the first section. I mean, the other option to me is bullets, but I think we both would agree that's not that aesthetically pleasing. Without some kind of division, it makes it harder to see that the three options are mutually exclusive, or arose independently at best. Without the divisions, in my opinion, it sounds like one origin narrative that all together led to the high five, rather than three separate possibilities. +UNBLOCK . The fact remains that some editor(s) who didn't believe that my biography was important enough for submission/inclusion mishandled themselves from the get-go, and never retreated from their misguided conduct. Once it was pointed out that they acted inappropriately (as has been acknowledged by several other editors, and even the offending parties themselves), rather than retreating and trying to fix the situation, they simply chose to throw more and more gasoline on an already burning fire. HOW DARE I CHALLENGE THEM, so they say. Is this the kind of Wikipedia that you people want? I pray not. +" On this day, June 26 ""1409 - Western Schism: The Catholic church is led into a double schism as Petros Philargos is crowned Pope Alexander V after the Council of Pisa, joining Pope Gregory XII in Rome and Avignon Pope Benedict XIII in Avignon."" Is the redundant use of Avignon necessary? " +" I dunno. In a completely different sport of American football, would you consider the first winner of the Heisman Trophy, Jay Berwanger, removed from Category:American football running backs for he didn't play football again after he graduated? Plus, if you remove the different FAs in the Filipino footy categories, most of those which are left are essentially extensions of the varsity teams. For example, Diliman FC are for UP Fighting Maroons alumni, same for Mendiola United FC and the San Beda Red Lions. Most players of the national team are varsity team players. If we'd go through your example, no Filipino footballer would be included in that category unless he played outside the Philippines. – the Duck " +" I need to quote you on this part. You said ""edits to your own user and user talk pages are in violation of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA"". But it's okay for to delete the talk page at Talk:NorthPark Center? In case you don't know he did delete the talk page but only put it on the archive folder after I reverted his action. I think you need to take reading classes. " +Please use the articles discussion page. +" Mention of the Rashomon is legitimate, but it is not particularly relevant in this article, which is not about the shooting. The mention is better written and better sourced in Shooting of Michael Brown. I have removed it from this article. ‑‑ ☎ " +" ALSO, my last edit was the one right before the user ""Dayewalker"" AKA ""Tippx"" came in and edited back to the exact version that Tippx reverted it back to about 4 or 5 times. It was this..... Allen B. West (born February 7, 1961) is a Republican U.S. Representative-elect for and a retired Army Lieutenant Colonel. Forced to retire from the Army following a controversial interrogation incident in Iraq in 2003, Congressman-elect West has also briefly taught high school and served as a civilian adviser in Afghanistan. With his successful campaign in the 2010 mid-terms, after an unsuccessful bid in 2008, he will be the first African-American Republican Congressman from Florida since Josiah T. Walls in 1876. Seems balanced. Nothings enhanced. Brief summary. Mostly his career and a some chance with it. Flows coordinately on through. Only divergence seems the statement ""Forced to retire"" as you guys mentioned but we can reword that somehow. That's no problem. Whatta ya think? " +I believe religious views should be taken into consideration in this article. Reading the article, I am shocked by the fact that it almost seems as if M********* is normal behavior, when infact, it's not. Sodomites should not be respected in any society, and wasting semen is a sickness worthy of disgrace. +To be fair, this isn't the kind of topic generally looked up by anyone but a student or specialist, and as such, will find much more value in being indepth and technical the way it is, rather than simplified for your average user. More simplified explainations can be found in the various pages for specific antipsychotics, which is quite possibly where the information you're looking for or interested in is covered? ;-) +" Agreed, as you said above, relisting should only be done when it isn't reasonable possible to close an AfD. I closed this debate as keep, as there were two editors with good keep arguments. (Contrary to Cunard's above claim, I do not simply count !votes). However, the nom asked me to reopen it, and I agreed that consensus could have been clearer, and I relisted it. Due to the nature of the Zachary Stone AfD, I relisted. If there hadn't been the concern from the subject, I would have closed it as keep. The other three that you closed I relisted because both the arguments for keeping or deleting the articles was weak. I felt that they needed wider input before closing one way or another. (talk) " +Quick question Why do you suck so much, and what actions do you take to ensure your low quality in every respect? +Just a few paragraphs above yours, Steel busted me for accusing Wildhartlivie of sockpuppetry. Now you're accusing me of it. You don't want to get banned for 24 hours, do you? This paragraph that I'm writing now consists of seven short sentences. I'm not longwinded, so what's the problem ? I'm cutting to the chase. Try it. +REDIRECT Talk:Vanda 'Miss Joaquim' +" Population estimates The surat population estimate is being changed to that on the website of the municipality, which provides no logic etc on how that was arrived (especially since it is not a census figure). WG on the other hand has been accepted as a reliable source (at WP:RSN and by external news agencies). Please do not change this without consensus here. —Spiff " +That really doesn't matter. ) +COMPLAIN & AND MORE COMPLAINS THATS WHAT U'RE GOOD FOR ! FUCKIN IDIOT ! If I happen to know who u are I'll wallop the shit out of u damn bastard ! FUCK OFF ! +" Clearly, some have an emotional or economic interest in minimising or even denying the importance of these consumer-oriented blind tasting competitions: The Emperor Has No Clothes The owners of 30 of the best wines in the world, in the judgment of a Champagne company president, were invited to a party in 1997. The event was organized by Jean-Claude Rouzaud to celebrate the 30th anniversary of his presidency of Champagne Louis Roederer. Half of his selections were from France. ""I’m a chauvinist and a nationalist"" he explained. ""Before agreeing to participate, the Bordeaux first growths set some conditions, the foremost being that no comparative tasting with their international competition would be held."" They didn’t even want to be included in a group photo with their colleagues from other wine regions, although they finally reluctantly agreed. ""But getting the Bordelais to have their wines served with the others', that was out of the question,"" said a Roederer spokesperson. So the event took place in two separate parts: first, a dinner featuring the Bordeaux wines; then a tasting the next day with all the other wines, but no Bordeaux. ""They are cowards,"" said a non-Bordeaux producer. But the host said ""I understand them."" He explained that ""They feel that when you are first growths you are untouchable."" Their problem is that they actually know better. They and the other named growth vineyards have a carefully cultivated image of superiority. This is a marketing advantage worth an incredibly enormous sum of money every year. However, they frequently fail to perform well in blind comparisons and realize how vulnerable they are to exposure and the destruction of their vaulted and very valuable reputations. Because of this the named growths (1) want to avoid comparisons and (2) try to discredit the results of such comparisons . Who can blame them? Those results can cost them a fortune in lost revenue. But the consumer benefits immensely. Party in Paris. Wine Spectator, 15-11-97 " +No probs. BASTARD! +List of Lithuanian gods The names, that haven't been listed in the new article These names haven't been identified by me yet: Austėja Auštaras Beržulis Blizgulis Divytis Dvargantis Junda Kaupolius Lada Lėta Magyla Maras Maro deivės Ragė Varūna - mother of Vejopatis Vėlės Žaltys Žemynas Žemė Žvaigždės +I am on the scene. ) (talk) +If Bandera Is Terrorist, You Are Supporter of Terrorism You keep stubbornly deleting from the article on Bandera facts on his terrorist nature. Meenwhile French police succesfully hunt other terrorists, less important than Mr. Bandera. If he is a terrorist, we must delete the entire article leaving there only a passage on his terrorist actions and terrorist ideology, as done on any other terrorists. Do you happen to know such word as complicity? Въ 95.220.87.246 +" The proof I was referring to is in the forms of clinical/scientific studies that doctors/scientists in the article refer to when explaining the nature of drugs in the body:The doctors contacted by The Chronicle agreed that drug residue can remain in fat for a short time, but not indefinitely. ""The longest we know that THC (the active substance in marijuana) stays in the fat is about a month. For ecstasy and LSD, we're talking about a day or two,"" said Dr. Neal Benowitz , head of clinical pharmacology at UCSF. " +" See note on your discussion page re McConico2.jpg • Talk " +" In order to facilitate reference to talk page discussions, I will need to create an archive page for the talk page content that one of the admins previously blanked. Is there any problem with that? You can link to a permanent revision in the history if need be, so long as the page was not actually deleted. As far as I know, nothing was permanently deleted, although some discussions have been moved to archive pages. The other thing I need to exhibit is the blocking message that KillerChihuahua posted. That one does not appear in any revision of this talk page; it appears on a template that I see on my user page, but I don't think others see that template. How do I reference or exhibit that original blocking message? Just go into the history, and click the appropriate date on a revision. That will bring you to a page, with a link. Here is an example, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moulton&oldid;=157221709. As an aside, what will you do if unblocked? Do you intend to edit articles again? How do I link to something that exhibits KillerChihuahua's original blocking message, wherein she gives the reason for blocking? It's too soon to decide what I will do if unblocked, as that depends on what transpires during the course of these proceedings. If the objectives I set forth in my RfC are embraced and endorsed, then it's reasonable to imagine that it would be feasible for people like me to contribute to the crafting of mainspace articles. If those objectives are repudiated by ArbCom, then there would be no point in editing articles, even if I were provisionally unblocked on technical grounds related to denial of due process. I have one other question on how these cases are titled. Is there any standard convention on titling these cases? this is your block log. Tilting? Not tilting, but titling. Do I entitle the case ""Moulton"" or ""Moulton v. KillerChihuaha"" or ""KillerChihuahua"" since she is the admin whose actions I am contesting. No vs. You are verses anything. You are requesting a unblock review to ArbCom. ""Moulton"" works. I have filled in the RfAr Template, and (unless you spot any deficiencies), I believe it is now ready for posting. Would one of you (Nathan or Anthony) please do the honors? Thank you. . Thank you! Notice for any observing parties, I am moving to unblock Moulton, after current attempts to seek reassurance from Moulton that he will not edit any pages except his user space and the relevant RfArb. sections/pages are complete. P.S., Moulton: check your email. I appreciate that you extended to me the courtesy of requesting that I directly and affirmatively express my intentions regarding your concerns. Also, thank you for posting the notices to the other parties. Whose responsibility is it now to confirm those notifications on the RfAr template? Request for Arbitration Template Original scratchpad version of the Request for Arbitration Template. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid;=177205578#Moulton Request for Arbitration as +" Your source is; ""T-90"". btvt.narod.ru. Retrieved April 11, 2014. ""Модернизированный танк Т-90С ""Тагил"" во всей красе"". Retrieved 15 November 2014. John Pike. ""T-90"". Retrieved 15 November 2014. However last two have same figure as global security, and BTVT is not reliable source for Russian armour protection, although it does have a lot of information about Russian armors. For example, BTVT claims that the protection of M1A1 abrams is 400~450mm KE, but in reality it was 600mm according to Steven Zaloga and the Soviet Intelligence. " +" diffs with edit summary ""avoid manual sizing of images per image use policy"" " +" :Chakola international A tag has been placed on Chakola international, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of Chakola international and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.| – (talk) " +" Spoiler Tags Oh sorry, didn't know about the standard. I've just been copying what I see on existing pages. I've also been adding a few cast lists in table format. Do those look okay? Are there other specific standards I should know? I looked at the Opera Project page but it doesn't give much detail on formatting. Any pointers would be a help so I don't do more stuff that has to be changed. Thanks. Trivia Thanks for backing me up on the removal of trivia in Carmen. I feel Wikipedia needs to offer more than just interesting but pointless information. Peer review Hey Kleinzach, I hope Japan is lovely. I was wondering if you would do me the favor of taking an excursion away from your purview of opera and take a look at a pre-opera article I've been working on, Concerto delle donne. The page for the peer review is Wikipedia:Peer_review/Concerto_delle_donne. I'd appreciate any comments you might have. Thanks, (talk) Ivan Petrov Hello Zinnober, i don't quite understand this remark. Theer is nothing strange in providing the link to the german article (incidentally written by me), because, as the latest example Ettore Bastianini tends to prove, english speaking wikipedians seem to deliberately ignore other languages (), and alos because Petrov is indeed little known and bears a very common name, like John Smith, if it were. He was a very fine singer though, as the external link on Petrow will show. You should do something about Alain Lombard ((de), (fr) as well, he was a very famous French opera conductor and director in the 1970s, before sliding slowly down until being completely forgotten today. Cheers, Zinnober? Who? A mistake? At any rate the Opera Project page really isn't the place for leaving unexplained, cryptic links to foreign Wikipedias. Please respect the way the main page is formatted. If you want to say something to members of the project then use the Talk page. In any case if a singer is little known, except to you, then the thing to do is to start of the article yourself. The point of the 'Can you help' section is to suggest names that other people are likely to be interested in. It's not for some form of personal POV promotion. Regarding your point about English-speaking Wikipedians, has it occurred to you that a lot of them can't speak foreign languages? - Klein Zaches, genannt (called) Zinnober (ETA Hoffman). Only a private joke, sorry. About the other point neither do i speak japanese or finnish, but whenever i write an article, i provide the links - if available - to those Wikis. It's not a matter of knowledge, it is - i am afraid - a matter of will. It's laborious to search 'manually' for articles in other languages. People use interwiki bots for this. - I know, but i won't let my world be (completely) taken over by machines ! Cheers, Weisgall's ""The Stronger"" edit This is to differentiate it from the Strindberg play, and other items (songs, etc.) entitled ""Stronger"". Using an adjective in a title is a can of worms in Wikipedia, see Stronger. My wife is working on the Weisgall and noticed it was missing from his list of works. So I discovered the can of worms. Thanx for noticing. Opera Singers Honestly, I know of only one Winnie Böwe performance. Hilary Summers, on the other hand, is a noted contemporary British contralto. " +Cause they may have ancestors from English-speaking countries??? +" That's original research. As far as we're concerned, the reliable sources said it's due out in 2015 and we should expect it as such. If 2016 rolls around without update, we can change the context of those sentences, but we don't just make stuff up. It is not up to us to determine the state of the game's development. We only report the sources. czar ⨹ " +" Whether one agrees or disagrees with this theory, it is essentially a point of view about what happens in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and should first be mentioned or developed there. It can be turned into its own article, per WP:SS, if its section there becomes too large, and if it is notable enough for its own article - that is, if there are many reliable sources discussing this theory. You see, with a topic as broad as this conflict, there are very many theories and points of view about it, from both sides of the conflict, and if they each had an article, we would have thousands of articles each discussing the conflict from its own narrow point of view. Please read our guideline WP:POVFORK, which guides our approach to such subjects. " +Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, +" This is so sad that Wikipedia is controlled by less than ""more reasonable administrators"". I am ready to write for BOTH articles. The Mrs. Biden article isn't so good. The Mr. Palin article is in the middle of an ocean wearing cement shoes." +I have never edited this pages. I am angry with Wikishitia +Gerald Achee Just to let you know that I declined your CSD. I think a claim to importance is established; moreover, it's a pretty decent looking article with references and all. Thank you, +I noticed that on the media page there are only FM radio stations. Can someone add some AM stations? +" to do a reply you just need to type it underneath the last text, no need for == reply == or anything, only use == == parameters if you are starting a new conversation. Also, please put ~~~~ at the end of a post or reply so that others know that it was you. (Report findings) (Past espionage) " +Soviet/Russian Issue- New Info An old discussion on the talk page (2006) and an old version of this article notes that the Russian scientists have baggage with the Russian Aeroflot (airline) logo which contains the Soviet hammer and sickle. See it at http://www.seeklogo.com/aeroflot-logo-3923.html and here on Wikipedia at Aeroflot. Now on the one hand, Aeroflot decided to keep this logo AFTER the Soviet Union dissolved & they became privatized (because it had become so recognizable)!!! On the other hand, virtually anyone seeing the film in 1968 would have concluded from the presence of the logo on the baggage that these scientists were working for the Soviet Union!! +" Again, you add tags when we are in the process of solving the issue plus you have already opened an RFC. ""Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort."" (Talk?) [ (New thread?)] " +There are many break away provinces of many countries which consider themselves to be independent countries. Only countries recognised by the United Nations should be recognised by Wikipedia for it to remain neutral WP:NPOV. This goes for both Georgia and Serbia. To recognise break away provinces of countries would create enormous numbers of disputes on Wikipedia, each case claiming bias and POV. Wikipedia articles should cover break away provinces of countries but not recognise them as independent countries. 88.106.115.106 +April 2008 Your unhelpful edits have been rverted. Please stop now. +" Disscussions with DMacks oth have understanding difficulty's.OneMadScientist (talk) I am talking about your behavior...we are all responsible for what we ourselves do, even if we feel provoked by others. It's a great test of one's strength to recognize when to help raise the level of discussion rather than inflaming tense situations. Your edits were explicitly written to insult a person rather than as constructive criticism of specific actions, and you even said you were trying to undo your previous steps towards repairing the destructive atmosphere here. That's all forbidden. Period. No ""but he said..."" or ""I'm just proving I was right all along"". What are your personal intents for being a Wikipedia editor? If it's to improve wikipedia articles, then go do so now and stop wasting everyone's time with discussions about your previous battles. If it is anything else, including trying to school others in morality or your sense of religious obligation, no...this website it not for you. DMacks (talk) @DMacks WELL - I'am talking about your, and Plasmic Physics's behavior and responsibility around here and maybe this website it not for you. You Would Do well Take your own advice DMacks. Is there not a word for describing the lack of following one's own advice (rules) which I have been condemned for using. Oh, yes now I remember, It is (hypocrite). And I was Beginning to think you had realized YOUR errors in regards to YOUR application of YOUR ""Obligations"" as a Wikipedia ""morality code"" enforcer and understood my very significant and valid arguments. Specifically for now - In regards to YOUR choice!!(and the actual definition) of what exactly constitutes a personal attack around here. And the objectivity by which it is applied and the selective abuse of its application by YOU in particular. You are now bringing up the very important point that I would Have Very Much desired to take up with you in your absence. I am sorry, I mistook your silence for understanding on your behalf. I contend that you have failed miserably in the ""great test of one's strength to recognize when to help raise the level of discussion rather than inflaming tense situations"" and should have known better given your display of ""apparent"" authority. I contend that (In This issue with Plasmic Physics - which you had been following from the start, at least) that after my initial ""transgressions"" and subsequent overly profuse apologies, was being very polite and civil. I was then was the subject of an Obvious personal attack from Plasmic Physics, who was my initial accuser!! in the very first instance (again NOT taking ones own advice!!). His remarks which OBVIOUSLY ""were explicitly written to insult a person (me) rather than as constructive criticism of specific actions"" and contained no factual justification. My response contained words and statements that were correctly and appropriately describing (with civil English words) the FACTS in relation to nature of his personal attacks on me. In my attempt to obtain an apology from him, while Lacking any support against his attack, you decided to label me the transgressor, but not him. You appear to be very negligent and biased acting in your ""appointed role here???"" to say the least, if not totally malicious. I contend that your obviously biased behavior should preclude you from further involvement in any ""moral code violation"" disciplinary action, let alone this specific one. This is for starters in addressing your negative comments about me. I hope I have I made this point clear to YOU now! OneMadScientist (talk) I would appreciate and DESERVE an apology from both of you but I can see that is unlikely. If not Please don't waste my time any longer with YOUR ""attempts"" at trying justify either your or Plasma Physics transgressions toward me or bother me any longer about this issue and I SHALL LEAVE YOU ALONE and seek others here who deserve my considerate attention. It appears that you two obviously should get along well together!." +I guarantee you every album that has been nominated for a Grammy Award for Best R&B; Contemporary album has it mentioned in the lead section like on Trey Songz Ready and Ushers Confessions album. THEY ALL HAVE IT IN THE LEAD. +The only nonsense I will approve is nonsense committed by 1)chaka zulu warriors. 2)anglican gay priests 3)cocksuck ers +John Wagner A special thank you to John Wagner. Without the background information he tirelessly assembled for his internet page on Lori Martin, this article would not have been possible. Thanks John. 7g7em7ini (10.9.06) +" Thanks for the referencing! Yes, OTRS tickets require separate permissions to view, and they are confidential. There is no need for you to take any other action at this point, but the article may come under increased scrutiny, so additional referencing might help. " +each other and call each other nasty named sometimes when there +So, can he be added now? It's been a while..... -Light. +Coming back to Tamil Eelam, it has no currency, no population, no land area and no identity (except in minds of some people. Even though many 'believe' and wish for heaven we don't list it as a country or a state. Imaginary 'hoomelands' cannot be treated as a leagal state. Some LTTE sympathizers try to present LTTE flag as the flag of Ealam!!! This is against many peaceful Sri Lankan Tamils. Before supporting a terrorist movement please do some resarch. I will remove all the unsupported such irrelevant sections in this article. Please provide references to support them beofore adding or leave them removed. Ranil +this page is about random crap talk.. just edit it already +" I was happy to support you I really had nothing to say in my comments that hadn't already been said by 70+ other editors who also thought you were an obvious choice. Good luck! (talk) " +I guess I'm supposed to respond here, then? Or am I supposed to cross-post back to you? Anyway - ahah! A lot of these tools are more or less exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much. +" DON'T ARGUE WITH THAT FARRAKHANISTIC MORON Why do you argue with that Farrakhan?? Ignore that moron, he doesn't know any better. Around 51% percent of DR is Mulatto(euro/black)or mixed and 46% Black. The mixed population lives mainly in the North,also known as the Cibao, while the Blacks are from the South like Sammy Sosa. This guy is a believer of "" one-droppism"", hyperdecent"". So forget about convincing this fool. It is like a religion, it is very hard to convert somebody from one into another. Northern Dominicans aka Cibaeños know who they are, they don't need these idiots to tell them what are they or what they are. This idiot doesn't know jack about our history. There are ignorant people in every nationality, granted, but that doesn't give license to generalize an entire nationlaity based on the reactions of some people. I'm Dominican, nobody has ever called me Black, even in the redneck deep south, even thou I do have Black blood, due to the fact that my family is not racist and some intermarrired with dark mulattoes. Anyways, ignore these idiots,look how he is bad-mouthing white people. white people have done lots of evil, true, but this idiot wouldn't even be talking garbage thru this computer if it wasn't for this invention from the white man in the first place. That's just to tell you about his pea-sized brain. Some people's intellectual levels, in any race or ethnicity, is just Jurassic, just stay away from debating things like politics, religion or race with Neantherthals." +" Official Mascot? Added to following sentence in opening paragraph: ""...she has since become a worldwide icon due to Disney's adoption of her as its official mascot..."". I could be wrong, but hasn't the ""official Disney mascot"" job gone to the mouse? " +Darwin caused the paradigm shift? Or was there already a focus on evolution? Or did Darwin just make it work... or...? +REDIRECT Talk:Hubbert peak theory/Archive 2 +Get a grip on your trigger happy CSD finger, please You put a completely unwarrented CSD notice on Visual Researchers' Society of Canada. Might I suggest instead of spending your time writing off the work of others, you contribute something useful yourself. +" scripts ""punchy dialogue""; ""witty""? How are the strings of smarmy self-satisfied quips and painfully melodramatic monologues that make up Dawson's Creek scripts in any way punchy or clever? I agree that the standards of 'POV' shouldn't be quite as high when arts or drama are being discussed (otherwise it's difficult to describe the thing in question) - but stupid POVs are too much. " +December 2008 Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +Thank you for your observations. +Company name has changed to Global Cloud Xchange +I've started a 2nd report. +Hi, Sitush good morning as i was new to Wikipedia i didn't knew many thing i thought that people are bully as we face few problem in the page before i never new that sitush and u or any others were in administration... so it was like we planned to take legal action so later on we came to know from concerned person that u guys are in admin... but then i was busy with work... later i got to know about it... the time you wrote Reema returns it actually sound like mummy returns... please guide and help me... for the same... i have valid link to it if you still feel that the link are not reliable then its fine with me.... 1. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-13/news-interviews/32663040_1_shiv-sena-film-songs-akshay-bardapurkar 2.http://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/2012/sep/010912-Pooja-Welling-and-sister-Reema-to-work-in-Ravi-Kissens-upcoming-film.htm if you feel this are not reliable source then please let me know that is reliable source... +" I'm confused by the statement ""Up to 95% of the freemartin's blood cells can be derived from those of its twin brother"". At birth? Throughout it's life? Aren't new blood cells generated from bones/bone-marrow? Or just red blood cells. Please clarify. Thanks! " +User:Brian0918 is a trollish admin who should be blocked for being uncivil, just ignore him +Jesus. Fuck. Honesty! 86.42.90.145 +" Code128 Auto Besides A, B, C there is Code128 Auto. The explaination is ""Automatically switch between the different code sets and performs characters optimization "". But how to do characters optimization?" +American bias I think future edits to this article need to help remove some of the American bias. The hurricane affected Japan but American customary units seem to be perferred (Japan is metric) and there is even a graphic of showing the size of the hurricane compared to the U.S. (with Canada and Mexico chopped off). +" Semi-vegetarianism section I like Flyer22's intention in that one's recent edits, though I find the particulars a little unclear. Here is my proposal for the section ( ): ===Semi-vegetarian diets=== Semi-vegetarian diets primarily consist of vegetarian foods, though occasional exceptions are made for some non-vegetarian foods, including fish, poultry and even red meat. These diets may be followed by those who choose to reduce the amount of animal flesh consumed as a way of transitioning to a vegetarian diet, or for health, environmental, or other reasons. The term ""semi-vegetarian"" is contested by most vegetarian groups, who believe that vegetarianism must exclude all animal flesh. Many individuals describe themselves as ""vegetarian"" while practicing a semi-vegetarian diet. Semi-vegetarian diets include: Flexitarianism: A diet that consists primarily of vegetarian food, but includes occasional exceptions such as red meat. Pescetarianism: A diet that is mainly vegetarian but also includes fish and sometimes other seafood. Pollotarianism: A diet that is mainly vegetarian but also includes poultry. " +Salon.com is a news organization and should qualify under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NEWSORG. The Worldnetdaily article is an editorial penned by Schlafly herself. It should be an RS for her words as quotation. I want to know why you consider RightWingWatch to be unreliable. They are a news service, and their articles include the audio and direct quotes/transcripts of what they cover. While they have a bias (their purpose to fact-check and cover things in right wing media) that does not, per the RS page, make them unusable especially when they include their sourcing. +I will be copying this to the page shortly. chen7754 +" All is well that ends well. (And the conclusion of a matter is better than its beginning.) -) talk " +Do not know — will investigate. +" More Vandalism Can somebody show me how to protect the logo summary text for a picture. Some fool called ""Josh"" keeps replacing the summary for the Google logo in Braille into his name. Childish fool." +"A few neanderthal writers in the past have even promoted ""the Ukraine"" to reflect the original meaning ""the borderland"" in order to diminish the international political stature of Ukraine. That's not bias if it is indeed true. He is trying to promote correct English, not promote a usage deprecated from the Ukrainian SSR. But the Russian Xenophobe around here never ceases to amaze me. If you're looking for an authoritarian source: http://www.economist.com/research/styleGuide/index.cfm?page=805717 " +Since K is a sock, I've removed the text. You can re-add it as your own if you choose to sponsor it +Because most of your edits done without any information on the topic. Also, the article copy edited before nominated for DYK. Your edit is always delete the text. If you want edit firs explain in here and after examine you can add in the article. +"==Notability of Derek P Auchie== A tag has been placed on Derek P Auchie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +" Bargnani Please wait until the deal has been officially completed. There has not been an official announcement. Just be patient. We know what we're doing, and we'll update things when it is necessary ^^^ " +defining a natural satellite as any body in orbit around a planet whose barycenter (the point around which they both orbit) lies inside the planet itself It seems to me that this still is not what is meant in the text: the concept natural satellite'' in that sentence includes components of double planets. This is manifest from the further text. +Admin Bishonen, thank you for bringing this up on the noticeboard. I can appreciate the work involved in gathering the diffs that you did, though I would draw particular emphasis to my concerns that you are not neutral in this matter as I explained here. I do look forward to further comment, particularly as to whether I should file an RfC or RfAr (I am still fuzzy on the difference between them, as I have never been involved with one). My best attempt at summarizing the dispute can be seen , with further evidence available as needed. Thanks. +" A pie for you! Thank you, for pointing out that My Babysitter's A Vampire (TV Series) thing. I had no idea. Here is a pie for you. " +" ""For performance spaces, oh, how about Lincoln Center, Carnegie Hall and Broadway Theatre."" ""For museums, look no further than, say, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the American Museum of Natural History. The galleries are mostly in Chelsea""-SORRY DON'T SEE THE FACTS FOR THOSE TWO. Your not stating any facts, your just mostly giving names of places in the city. " +" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. T/C " +Is this thing officially undergoing rapid intensification? +" Ta, I couldn't presume the answers, though Id guessed. Ceoil " +" For some reason this didn't register as a new messages bar. Explains the redundancy below. He helped me with everything that I needed help with, becasue he was always on. I mean seriously, always. Which probably explains is retirement. I remember a few months back he was T'Shael, and known as ""That Vulcan Guy"" by me and my (now retired) . He fixed my userboxes. And Scribbles' spelling. And my, now impeccible, spelling. Then innumerable small WP dilemmas. Then my icons. And he never shouted at me. And he always ised to say ""Impressive, no?"". Some other stuff to, I'd have to lokk around for them. Then he gave me a Barnstar. Then my userpage title. I was even going to give him a Barnstar next week! Oh crap, WP:ISNOTAMEMORIAL, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) " +" Issue over number of Carey singles An issue involving the number of Mariah Carey songs with articles has become thorny. Too thorny. There are articles for ""So Lonely"" and ""Mine Again"" despite the fact that they won't be released for another few months. Is it really necessary to have these articles when their release has not even been confirmed? I feel not. " +hi has been active at recently. with name . thanks +Who are the people coming out of the woodwork? +Discussing summarization/deletion Hi Babakathy! I opened a discussion at Talk:France about the article's size, just as you had suggested me, but it has been pretty much ignored, it didn't draw any kind of comments so far (not even negative ones). This was somewhat expected, so I'm considering the possibility of going ahead with the summarization, even though the discussion isn't going anywhere, because the alternative seems to be doing nothing at all (again). If you want to leave a few comments/suggestions on how to work on that article to get it to an acceptable size, that would be great. Cheers! +" No doubt that Romney led a ""group.""? I'd love to see that claim of ""no doubt"" tested in court. Testimonies of possibly biased witnesses from 50 years ago, during an election campaign, do not remove all doubt. " +Leaving aside questions of viewpoint, I think that level of detail belongs in History of Christianity or Early Christianity. Incidently, is History of Christianity/Jesus, pre-4th century Christianity, and syncretism a subpage? Talk +" Corona radiata is a neurological term. ""Seeing lights"" may be a reference brain/neuro problem. And, with ""The Four of Us..."" maybe it's Quadrophenia-esque. " +Categorization of plant orders Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Categorization#Taxonomic rank categories. Categorizing plant orders is independent of the main taxonomic classification. +" Good catch there. I think ""managed"" is a better word. ""Organized"" seems to suggest that there are an unending number of things that need to changed every year the show is held. " +Natalie Zea The information is accurate and verifiable. I provided two sources. 86.43.216.73 +" Promises, Promises One I promise to look at the screen while typing and turn the auto spell check on...so that someone known as Nishidani doesn't pick on my spelling....promise...PS nice to see you picking on me.. Never trust spell-checkers, it's better to guess, and your's was better than that of the Japanese gentleman who, prey to a phonological difficulty in pronouncing 'l', wrote 'interrectual', which is, judging by the historical record, an occupational hazard of that class. It's a medicinal necessity for me to pick on people, as it stops me from picking my nose, which can lead to major haemorrhaging (sp.?)at my age, and I dislike the idea of an obituary writing that down as the cause of my death. sorry nishidani I removed your bit on league of nation mandate as it is already mentioned further up the article.. No need to apologize. We all make errors, and I more than most. I can never get any work done, trying to reason on talk pages. I see now Shiruberstein, an editor I like, is taking me to task for never having writing any article of quality, but only edit-warred (? a strange interpretation of a 3 year attempt to reason through fundamental problems to get some lineaments of consensus) so I guess I must rethink everything here. It really is a waste of time. Cheers I love the chuckleheads. I've always just got on with thing, I don't so much lead with the chin as charge in full steam ahead. I had a great laugh at cool making out that I had done the ""large make over"" when it was one of them, I just added bits to his make over. They don't seem to appreciate quotes from books that can't be found in JVL...bye the bye, nice bit on Lebanon not invading Israel. greatly appreciated..The tripe tripe that Israelophiles trot out has been found to be false many years ago and still they try to shovel manure... Don't use the word 'Israelophiles' within my hearing. There are a lot of people who love that country, within and beyond, and yet are as deeply distressed by its military and political history as they are of their own. (Many virulent critics of America are infused with a deep patriotism, idem elsewhere). Always distinguish, cultivate an ear for nuance, particularly in what you say or think, otherwise you needlessly offend decent people. (Asto the rest, of course) I'm sorry if the word offends...I don't know of any other word that can be used to describe someone who is in love with Israel...Its use is the same as Anglophile or francophile...I have come to the conclusion that nationalism is a destructive force with very few redeeming qualities.... You're right in logical terms, since it has analogies with the terms with which you compared it. But language is not logical (it is one of the flaws in I/P articles that no attention is paid to this, despite academic literature on the issue), but full of queered exceptions, where tone and use subvert comparisons rooted in a sense of parity. For example, just the fact that in standard usage, -phile is suffixed to a disyllabic term for a country ('Anglo'/'Franco'/'Sino'/'Russo'), whereas Israelo-, having three syllables, differs and creates a slight jarring difference from the norm, counts. There's an informal rule that ethnic disyllable are neutral, a pejorative connotations elicit monosyllables ('spik, wog, yid, chink, gook, hun','nip'/'jap', 'frog' etc., though exceptions exist, 'Polack') and this plays round the other terms, to nuance them in various ways. Language is a minefield, and what to one ear sounds okay, to others may resonate differently. To illustrate on a different level, Wiki as I said is full of incoherencies over pages, and hidden traps, and most efforts, as the present one on 'Judea and Samaria' to get clarity and conceptual coherence into the encyclopedia fail because most people are tone-deaf to these things. One I noted long ago was that in articles like that on Avraham Stern,Lehi, orGush Enumin you'll often note native Israeli editors insisting on the word 'underground' to describe them, these ultra-Zionist terrorist movements, and, I don't think this word is used of comparable Arab movements i +Where did you get this information from? Do you realize I am Hispanic? I don't feel insulted. Wikipedia is not a place for your POV. Your claim is baseless and ridiculous. +" Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ""Adal Sultanate"". Thank you." +" I am really disappointed with the dictatorship you Wikipedia administrators carry out. In your particular case, you still want to imagine you are living in the Meiji era. Okinawa is NOT another country anymore; the Okinawan tongue is a dialect of Japanese, like it or not (it was established so by the government years ago, after carrying out extensive linguistic research, and realizing the grammar is the same) (Palau, Korean, and Ainu are clearly not related). I can't understand how Wikipedia can let a soldier, a brutish animal without intelligence, closer to the neanderthal than to the homo sapiens, have more authority editing articles than an expert in the subject. And you Americans are clearly the most retarded people on Earth. Now I see why Americans in Japan can only get the ugliest and most retarded women out there. Bitches who, if they don't marry a dumb American, will end up single forever. Shame on you, Wikipedia!! Let me recommend you a site you may find ""interesting"", a site that shows how lots of people feel about the most unreliable encyclopedia on Earth: http://www.smoblogger.com/wikipedia-sucks/" +" Drappel, please stop reverting or read the god damned talk page, some medical practitioners..."" is weasel word crap, and the discussion of phentype is DIRECTLY contradicted in the following paragraph. I am not a vandal, but at this point you are." +C' Mon Speed it! Dear Deltasim Hurry up with Blinky Bill Season 3 Summaries. Where have you been lately? You don't need youtube videos to see it? Unregistered user, 16:36, June 7, 2011 (UTC) +" Vera Peterson Why did you arrogate it upon yourself to delete my contribution about Vera Peterson to ""unseen characters""? It's people like you who have gradually made the Wikipedia less and less enjoyable. It's one thing to delete material that's unverified, inaccurate, libelous and so forth, but increasingly I've been encountering self-appointed gatekeepers who like to decree exactly how much information belongs in an article. That's unfair. In any case, Vera Peterson was the quintessential unseen character (like Maris on Frasier). Oh, by the way, you have quite a few spelling errors on your home pageit should be ""there's,"" not ""theres"" and ""further"" not ""furthur.""" +unblock|1=I have not edited on Beyond My Kens page, as the admin claims I did, that is simply not truthful. I replied to another users comments regarding that user, there is no interaction ban between us, and all I did was to comment and reply to another user.}} {{ +Can you please unblock me. I promise I wont do it again please. +" Once you have your username and your password, click on the link on the top right corner of the page (it's at the very top!). Enter them both and you should be logged in under your new username. To make sure, instead of the Log in at the top, it should say you username followed by my talk, my preferences, my watchlist, etc. - (Talk||Home) " +Blocked 1 week. No problems about your coming here to request - thank you for stopping by. talk +REDIRECT Talk:The Definitive Collection (Santana album) +dont use spaces, dumbass +" CIH Finally there is an article here: Opel Cam-in-head engine. I haven't finished yet but am going to sleep, I hope you have content and I know that you have at least one excellent source waiting. Cheers, now let's go fix all those links to the German entry... ✎  " +Get lost vandal! Stop removing the notability tag from Steve Rackman. He's not notable and you know he's not notable! Stop making excuses and leave the tag alone! Better still, send it to AfD! 101.182.144.48 +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.  – (Talk) 05:27, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) +Regardless of chronology, Phelps' law firm is intricately linked with his sect. The fact that Phelps has been convicted of perjury and has been disbarred goes to credibility and context, ,as long as they are referenced. Best, +Also, Edwards Airforce base was being questioned as well, due to its wide and long runway. Bow | DOWN +"|""ugly comments"" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And ""page blankings""?? I never blanked a page, you liar." +Bakery In Germany, they now have added threshing, Mixing with water, kneading the dough and leaving it to rise, and baking to harvest breadrolls direct from wheat. I couldn't find any online sources, but have seen this process in operation in Bavaria. +user/Seraphimblade Seraphimblade worst guy in wikipedia +" Not really sure, but a Google search gives some ideas. This result and this one (and other search results), both mention the Toronto Blessing as part of the ""revival"" of holy laughter, or somesuch gobbledygook. − ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) " +" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Seda Pumpyanskaya. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Absolutely. I'll work on it either tomorrow or later tonight. Thanks for pointing me towards that! It's a ! (Talk to me?) +Ukrain == Dude, please have a look at Talk:Pancreatic cancer and Ukrain. What do you think?  | T@lk I will, but my hands are a bit full - ArbCom case, real-life stuff, folks happy to believe the best of an obvious abusive sock and the worst of me... the usual. I'll get to it, though. '''''' Talk == +" Whenever there is a source that is in direct conflict with your POV, you call it unreliable. I hope everyone sees how nationalistic this all sounds. Also, PLEASE REQUEST CHECKUSER, I REALLY WANT TO SEE JUST HOW WRONG YOU ARE. - talk " +Samson Actually the evidence suggests that Samson was in fact a Sikh considering there is no other plausible reason for losing one's strength when one's hair is cut. +That can equally be said of ‘ñ’ and ‘ç’; however, once one learns what functions the tilde and the cedilla serve, they become pronunciatory aids to show that words like “piñata” and “façade” are pronounced as (or, more usually, ) and (or ) — and not as and (or ). As I said, the functions of the ʻokina, tilde, and cedilla could all be learnt very quickly by those who are unfamiliar therewith. Just because a character is only ever found in borrowed terms does not mean that it cannot function as a pronunciatory aid. +" I read with a pen and find plenty I read in need of improvement in one form or another. I reworked the ""Soil"" article and am moving from there to subjects related to soil. This article needs a bit more. Here is my reference...Cleveland P. Hickman Jr., Larry S. Roberts, Frances M Hickman (1984, 7th ed.). Integrated Principles of Zoology. Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing. p 45. ISBN 0-8016-2173-9. It is a college level reference. " +Merry Christmas, A Nobody Thanks for the gift and wishes, A Nobody. A very Merry Christmas to you too! Best. +Yeah, it still says he is the President/head of state. This obviously should be changed. 24.245.36.123 +" Except there's an active clarification going on right now, and it seems pretty upfront, everyone who's spoken up has said ""No, what SA is trying to pull is Wikilawyering"". I'm just going off on the number of people who aren't speaking up. It's not as difficult as people try to make it. " +heil Herr Gott!!! before GOAULD ever were , Adamic language was: Anne Catherine Emmerich, a Catholic mystic, suggested that Adamic was Proto-Indo-European, without using that specific term, but noting that it seemed to share features with Bactrian, Zend, Sanskrit (three Indo-Iranian languages), and German.Anne Catherine Emmerich, Life of Jesus Christ And Biblical Revelations (1790). +Earlier Experiments? Many years ago I read a book covering this research, and recently needed to recover some of the details - the problem is that they are missing and there is no mention of them in the article at all. As I remember it the original experiments in water memory involved electro-magnetic induction, and it was only later experiments that involved 'homeopathic' techniques. It is the earlier experiments that interest me - mainly as I would like details on how to repeat them. (if they actually exist) If they do exist they would be an important part of this article. +It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Insulinoma. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. +Orangemike edits Please learn to separate factual edits from vandalism. The edits made from this IP address were merely factual edits to Orangemike's page to reflect Orangemike's sudden fame resulting from his mention on the Toucher and Rich show. Deleting factual edits constitutes vandalism. +He called an anti-vandalbot a biased pusher of rightwing propaganda, what happened to the days where you actually used believable starwmen? It used to be an art form for you, now it's just some kind of strange campaign against wikipedia, get over yourself +hello my name is jon (jonathan) and if you think that the earth is made by monkys well your rong. its made by god. if you read the bible it will show you but if not you will not hno whaut to belive. and it will say in the first book in the bible. have a good day night or what ever your in rite now good bye. +"== Wow == This article needs so much work it's not even funny. I'll see what I can do...fixing up little things here and there. Update: I am trying to get this to FA-status, and I think it's getting very close. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. 12:33 EST, 24 August 2006 List of New Jersey Devils players I have created a List of New Jersey Devils players to compliment the one in categories. When making player additions to the New Jersey Devils article, could you also add the player to the list of Devils players? Thanks! Masterhatch 5 August 2005 Is this a complete list that will be updated periodically? Do we have a master database for this information anywhere? (T | C) Devils Captain soon? Say RGTraynor and/or Masterhatch, do you know if the Devils plan to name Patrik Elias captain, when he returns to the lineup? Or is the captaincy to remain vacant for the 2005-06 season? No knowledge, although possibly the Devils' website has an archived press release to that effect. In any event it's speculative, and there's no need to post anything until and unless the Devils make any formal announcement of a new captain. I've added Scott Niedermayer to the Devils ""Captain list"", as he's on the captains list, in the Offical New Jersey Devils website. Because we really need more reminders of how we got shafted this season?? ;) (T | C) Wow, the is team most of the most amount of American players in the NHL! Scouts and Rockies Why are you expanding content knowing that such content has articles to themselves??? Because I plan on expanding the Scouts & Rockies articles beyond what they say, and the history of the organizations should be mentioned in the article on the current version of the franchise. I'm thinking ahead to when this is further expanded, since I plan on improving this article to Featured article status. Besides, they're still only paragraphs compared to the main article as a whole. Hit me up... Maybe others disagree, but I think this article should only explain the circumstances of the Rockies relocation to NJ. Its also borderline plagiarism of the source you cited. It is obvious you took thier copy and merely editted it to your liking. Current practice on the NHL Team Pages is to write up the history of previous incarnations of the same franchises on their particular pages, and have a very brief summary at best on the current page. Expanding the KC/Colorado pages makes perfect sense; duplicating the same text on the NJ page is redundant and liable to be reverted. Relevant to this discussion:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the New Jersey Devils Steve Gionta dont remove that. Why? It is fairly unimportant information. It is quite common for relatives to be in the same sport. See Notable families in the NHL for a number of examples of relatives that have actually made it to the NHL. I will remove the information. Agreed. Until Steve does something notable, he doesn't belong in the article. Team Logo Can we come to a consensus on whether or not the logo should be used in the season-by-season record table? I don't know if it is legitimate fair use as I'm not a lawyer. I would rather see the logos removed from that table because they are pointless and repetitive. In an article called ""New Jersey Devils"", can't we assume that someone looking at that table would know its referring to the New Jersey Devils? Is the fact that the logo once had green in it somehow relevant to their record on the ice? (talk) I can't comment on the fair use aspect, but I do agree that adding logos to each year in the records table is rather pointless. [[User:Cholmes75|cholmes75] +, 13 March 2012 (UTC) The dancer thing was a bit of a joke but exemplifies POV and lack of definition accuracy communication humours. 99.251.114.120 21:23 +RV Sorry about the RV, went to check on this topic today and saw that someone? erased the page under my username. I'll change my password immediatly. +I thought about this some more and went ahead and emailed them. (talk) +"For instance, read what the dynasts were saying about the dynasty being ""ancient"", or look at what King Tvrtko I wrote in his letters, about the dynasty ""having reigned Bosnia ever since Bosnia was founded""... We know Borić (of Berislavićs of Grabarje) was the first Viceroy of Bosnia and the ruler of the then newly founded Banate of Bosnia. Go to the Ban Borić article, I updated it. Please try not to be rude. " +"::::""Fire of the Torah"" isn't a reliable source for anything but what religious extremists think, and their attacks on UNRWA don't belong in this article any more than Pat Robertson's speculation about links between abortion and cyclonic storms belong in Hurricane Katrina. Benny Elon's criticisms do have some relevance, but they need to be contextualized. Cough cough, populist demagoguery, cough cough. " +I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're attempting to say here, or why. Can you be more specific? Thanks. +So have I; though I realize that Holland is not correct and that it is really only a reagion of the Netherlands.72.92.4.157 +Gilli Respected Gilli, Please unblock me from wikipedia my username is user:Mriduls.sharma and if you dont unblock me than i will do presistent vandalism. Please reply me back.From:59.91.240.127 +Mister Watson You are a clever bloke who can bat this backwards and forwards as well as anyone, but I think that anyone genuinely objective would think that you were over-the-top. The picture you paint of me is unfair. E.g the Mail did say thetre was something reasonable about a Nazi slogan, but you conflate me saying so with my attitude to this Christian geezer, inferring that I called him a Nazi. You follow me a bit too closely. I concur with every single Wikipedia rule without question, but feel that they can be manipulated and used selectively by editors; and that some administrators sometimes go too far then won't back down, and a few seem to enjoy it. If I could find a way technically, I bet I could also find five Wiki users and possibly administrators to support me over Christian. Personally, as I have said before, I would welcome a mandatory test for all those wishing to edit, and I'd add ongoing peer-review from equals. If you watch me for years you will probably find reasons to block me, but its seems a bit draconian and a waste of your time. Even driving licence points get removed after a while, and you are told how long they will stand when awarded them. I have a bit of a chip on my shoulder I admit. The fact that I am a bit of a working-class intellectual who doesn't fit normal profiles seems to concern some people on the left and right, and I feel that they have it in for me. Sob. +Mr.Checkon == This man deserve mention but some fag admin keeps deleting it. == +" Re: 2012–13 Elgin City F.C. season I wouldn't say it's the norm to hide something with a number of references, probable best just to add a expansion needed template. I'm going to complete the winter list in the coming weeks, I know a few editors have been working on it but I'd say there is still a good few missing so I may do the Elgin transfers after that, not promising anything. ★☆ ☆★ " +in year articles, such as 1980 +"==Changed ""Chinese run pawnshops"" to ""pawnshops""== To call pawnshops, that fence stolen goods, ""Chinese run"" is a primitive form of relative Orientalism: it attempts to re-present the homegrown crime as somehow from abroad, from an ""orient"", here China. The fact is that sinoThai are Thai in the modern sense, not ""Chinese"" unto the next generation, and no more likely to be crooks than Tai people. " +Message from Cultivatedbookman aka cultivatedbookmaster To Dodo. It´s just payback, blood for blood, article for article. +And what if the lake's outlet to sea is not clearly titled as a river? Also: how should we regard watercourses (rivers?) which appear via Ynglis to have acquired the title Water? 17:00, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC). +" Again, arguing about something you don't even know. And what ""warning""? Are you even in a position of giving ""warnings""? " +Tax: I just noticed that there is a short piece on taxation in the article, with references, at Consumers' cooperative#Role of government. There is also a lengthy article on the United States taxation position in the Talk page, currently above at Talk:Consumers' cooperative#Role of government REI: On a global scale, REI is quite small and relatively unknown. However, as the best known consumers' coop brand in the US, it is probably worth a mention. Bkobres, I think your comment about removing content is hyperbole, as nothing is ever deleted from Wikipedia. However, I quite understand your giving up, as collaboratively editing an article can be quite stressful, especially if you have some pride in your workmanship. Thanks to the GFDL, when you leave Wikipedia, you can always fork an article that you like, putting a copy on a read only website so no-one can vandalize it. I have been tempted to do that now and again. (or Hrothulf) (Talk) +"== Article flagged - could use a photo of a pit bull in attack mode == Before we get into discussing this article there is some background information that everyone needs to understand. First,statistically, pit bulls are less agressive (naturally) than, beagles, german shepards and other breeds. Secondly, the dogs only want to please their owners, that is why if you watch the [disgusting] videos of dog fighting you will see 90% of the dogs are wagging their tails because they hear their owner(s) encouraging them to fight. A perfect example is the Michael Vick case, his dogs were taken and put into kennels, as per a federal jury they were not killed because of the [high] profile of the case. Out of the 66 dogs there were taken 8 were put down; which means that is only 12%. Out of the other 58 dogs they have all been adopted to families along with being trained for hospice and hospitals to help raise self esteems on patients. The best saying to sum up the Pit Bull breed is too ""Blame the Deed NOT the Breed"" which means dont classify ALL pitbulls as fighting agressvie dogs, just the one's that are beaten and treated like crap by the owners and bred for fighting. Pit bulls are NOT agressive by nature. If you look at american history we used to LOVE Pit Bulls, I mean there was Petey (little rascals) and betty boop had a pitbull. Plus many other famous actors/actresses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) The article discusses at length the dangerous nature of pit bulls, but lacks a picture of a pit bull attacking or behaving aggressively. The photo of a muzzled pit bull is a start, but is insufficient. I realize it may not be easy to obtain a such a photo in the public domain or by permission, but I'm adding a request in any case. Why does the article need that? Any dog breed can attack. There's nothing special about the way that a bully breed attacks. The muzzle image is fine; it illustrates that fact that some bully breed individuals do have aggression tendencies which need to be addressed if the dog is in public. Talk A photo of an agressive dog would be better suited for a dog fighting article. To place a photo of an aggressive dog in an article describing a breed would be similar to using a photo of a soldier shooting an enemy during war on the Human article... Or a Jew in a concentration camp, or I suppose a photo of a mugging would compare to animal aggression, but those wouldn't be true to Human character would they? Isn't a photo of a muzzled dog more relevant to a discussion of dog muzzling laws? Some places, such as some public parks, require all dogs to be muzzled while attending, regardless of breed, so a photo of a muzzled dog can have different interpretations. As I wrote in my first post, for an article that discusses pit bull attacks, an illustration of such would not be improper to accompany the text. Wikipedia:Images: ""Images must be relevant to the article they appear in and be significantly relative to the article's topic."" Here are a couple of news media stories that felt it appropriate to use such images: http://www.ktul.com/news/stories/0108/485244.html and http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/02/mandatory-confi.html. Perhaps a pit bull owner out there would be proud to have such an image of their guard dog in attack mode displayed in the article or perhaps a kennel owner or victim of an attack was able to snap a photo that they would donate and upload to Wikipedia Commons. I remember there used to be a photo of a ""smiling pit bull"" in the article (see archive Nov 1, 2007). We could return that in the positive press section at the same time to maintain balance. A single screenshot image could also be obtained from a television news report about pit bulls and included under fair use. Research: Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Non-free_content and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Non-free_television_screenshot Template:Non-free_tele +you can start a user page and put your photo up there +Ha ha. Verbal agrees with you that's a good one. Verbal's specialty is attacking articles he doesn't agree with. After tangling with him for 1-1/2 years, I've come to the conclusion that he never writes an original word of his own. He's a self-appointed censor. He knows all the rules, but he interprets them to favor his position, and in the process he ends up breaking the rules himself. He doesn't care if people get upset in fact, he takes pleasure in upsetting them. He won't collaborate in a meaningful way because it's too constructive and time-consuming. Instead, he'll take unilateral action, like reverting your edits, or cutting chunks out of the article you are working on, or stealth-deleting it with a redirection. Basically, he's a control-freak, and Wikipedia is his adopted domain that he is trying to control. He single-handedly soured me on Wikipedia, and I'm sure I'm just one of dozens. +Where does this come from? +The point of the long quote of Cahill, from his book, was to show that it's clear what he said, and it was in context. And also, to make the point to Jeffro77 that Cahill alone originally was my source for the edit, not really Wilson. The Wilson quote and ref came later on...only because of Jeppiz's demanding another source on this Talk page etc, etc. That was really all. My long comment above was mainly (though not exclusively) to Jeffro77, because of certain things he commented and wrote above. +" Thanks for prompting me! This is the first GA article that I have nominated, so I'm learning the protocol. (I didn't notice your review comments for a few days.) I made one pass through the comments for things I can deal with quickly, and I will come back and deal with the remainder very shortly, likely tomorrow. I have two questions: (1) ""there’s a ""chapter ignored"" parameter error in ref #43"" I don't see the error message, and I don't see any cite that uses a chapter= parameter, so I'm not sure what needs to be fixed. I think we are talking about this cite, which I admit is a little odd: \{\{cite conference|booktitle=Proceedings of the High School Conference of November 23, 24 and 25, 1922|date=March 1923|publisher=University of Illinois|location=Urbana, Illinois|pages=112–117|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=wjMZAQAAIAAJ&dq;=robert%20ridgway%20at%20home&pg;=RA1-PA112#v=onepage&q;=robert%20ridgway%20at%20home&f;=false|first=Ella R.|last=Dean|title=Robert Ridgway at Home|editor=High School Visitor's Office, ed|accessdate=4 March 2013\}\} (2) ""accessdates are not required for links to printed publications"" are we saying that accessdate= parameters should be removed for such cites, or that they're optional, i.e., not strictly necessary? " +"It is somewhat blurry...although I never really thought that a ""more flattering"" photo of Courtney Love was really possible. " +Please clean up this page and add more information. please also add a photograph of cowie, and of his books. Add information concerning other places where he has been profiled. +" I don't mean to butt in, but in regard to Photos of his design work can be found in textbooks on lighting design, including Richard Pilbrow's ""Stage Lighting Design"", where his work is displayed next to Ken Billington and Tharon Musser. (1997, Hollywood: Quite Specific Media Group), can you find similar some similar sources? That seems promising. For better or worse, it is the degree of public attention that one garners that tends to establish notability in our sense. (talk) " +" August 2007 Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Please stop creating pages based on copyrighted material you paste from tv.com. You've been warned several times, and the information cannot be used on Wikipedia. Thank you. Ariel♥Gold " +What is wrong with you? +I guess I need to go restart my modem and get a new IP address then...76.206.21.78 +I see. I added a CoI warning to the user page since they seem to be the same individual. - +" ""Aspergers syndrome"" Aspergers is very hype nowadays. 40 % of those who get the diagnose don't have the condition. I think you should therefore remove the speculations about him having ass burgers, because you provide absolutely no evidence to back up your claims and i think it's very dehumanizing for the memory of Newton." +" Kekeke zerg rush I firmly believe that the proper usage is ""kekeke zerg rush ^____________________^"" 24.184.188.175 " +Whooops.Sorry about that. I have done just a little editing in that project because I carry a lot of emotional baggage that starts bubbling to the surface when I try. Perhaps I will try again. +" Image:CandymanCover.jpg Hi there. Thanks for uploading the cover for ""Candyman"" at Image:CandymanCover.jpg. The image has been removed before, and I'm guessing that it's because people believe that it is not the real cover. If possible, would you mind providing a link to where you found the image or how you obtained it? " +You were unblocked, so behave in the right way, or you will be blocked again, for longer period than this time. +Huh? When I put that comparison on the Photoshop article it was removed. They said that the Photoshop page was no place for a comparison to GIMP. They wanna be here? carol +You are all both nuts. Mariah Carey is the highest-grossing female artist. She charges the most for tickets and sings for the least amount of time (costume changes, DJs, backup singers singing lead, her dog comingh out on stage! So she earns the most revenue per minute singing,m which means she is in first place. +" The character was always refereed to as Piccolo through the entire series, so that's the name of the character. We are in no position to change the name of the character from that used by the series creator. No amount of fanboy screaming is going to change that. And to correct the IP, Piccolo is neither Kami's nephew or brother. He is the embodiment of Kami's ""evil"" side which was separated from the main body when Kami took over as the guardian of Earth. This is why when Piccolo died, Kami died as well. —'''''' (t | c) " +They were unarmed and there was no remote control for the bomb that had not been planted at the time they were shot, however nobody knew that until afterwards and the ECHR report makes it clear that a radio device was anticipated. The verdict of the Gibraltar court was lawful killing and that remains, so to say they were 'murdered' is pushing a POV which is not factually correct. Claiming ranks for terrorists in plain clothes is a debate I'd rather not get into. +NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL FROM WIKIPEDIA I am writing this message to you as a notice of my withdrawal from Wikipedia following the recent events/edits on the CNN and Susan Roesgen pages – events that you were involved in. Never in all of my years in academia (the better part of a decade) have I been privy to such patently-insincere and downright academically-fraudulent work as that which I have encountered on Wikipedia. While I was initially willing to set aside all of the negative things I had heard about Wikipedia in an effort to contribute to a seemingly beneficial project, the actions of editors and administrators on the Susan Roesgen and CNN pages has made it eminently clear that “scholarship” and Wikipedia truly are mutually exclusive – propaganda has carried the day. My failure to grace the project with some actual academically-sound work was not made in vain, however; with every neutral editor that you drive out of the project with your blatantly POV-pushing agenda, you further bolster your reputation as nothing but an unreliable propaganda board. Your reputation for unreliability was perhaps best captured in a recent statement made by my corporations professor: “I decided to make myself more ignorant on the topic by looking at the article (Dodge v. Ford Motor Company) on Wikipedia.” I strongly encourage you to alter your course, set aside your agenda, and reverse your – and Wikipedia’s – reputation as a laughing stock. This will not only benefit the public in general, but will, I submit, actually make you feel better about yourself. Best, J.M. +I restored my comment Hey I just wanted to let you know that I restored my comment to Jimbo's talk page. Per Resolute, we don't have the right to refactor others comments so that being the case I put it back. Cheers. 108.45.104.158 +Dicklyon: I removed your so-called references on trig.functions as those refs are on Fourier analysis. Please stick to the topic (Vanicek analysis) only. Thanks. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Cobi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. sium " +U FAT NOOB!! I'm Samuel Gary Carter and I can't offend myself!! I didn't add either of those pages soo something must have hacked into mya ccount and done i tthere +Little boys turn me on +, and ElKevbo, you are right in claiming that we are not claiming that Harvard isn't the most prestigious as that sounds a bit to peacocky for my own taste, and probably even yours +Your edits Are not helping. +" According to http://tattoo.about.com/cs/piercefaq/a/pronouncelabret.htm?terms=lip+piercing+jewelry It is often mispronounced as ""Luh-bray"" as though it were french, I have actually heard it mispronounced that way. It also says the proper pronuciation is ""Lah-bret."" I'll go ahead and add this to article and cite that site as the source. " +" ""was a successful American wrestler"" Why the understatement? With 4 world titles and 2 olympic gold he is considered by the wrestling community to be the best American freestyle wrestler ever. " +In India It is an Multidisciplinary Course that comprises Aspects of Applied Biology as well as Technology. The Duration of this Course is 4 years divided into 8 Semesters.As it is an professional degree course,After Graduation in these course, the students generelly called Agricultural Biotechnologists. in India college offering these course are very few( except some Agricultural University Offering that course) These course is came under credit base system,student have to complete 160 Credits in 4 year including non credit courses like English and Mathematics. it comprises subjects like Biochemistry,Genetics,Recombinant DNA Technology (Genetic Engineering), Enzymology,Molecular cell Biology,Immunology,Virology,Computer application in biotechnology, Bioinformatics, Industrial Microbiology,Plant Tissue Culture,Food Biotechnology and Biostatistics ,plant pathology and many more It uses the application of Biotechnology in Agriculture to improve the production of crops.it gives a improve variety of cotton called BT(Bacillus Thuringiensis) Cotton and other improved varieties. Also it is an application of safe storage of food and Processing on food with the help of food biotechnology. In virology there is a study of viruses that affect the crop. Immunology concerns with to study human immune system. In Recombinant DNA Technology or Genetic Engineering there is study about how extract DNA from plant. Biochemistry includes study of Bimolecules. Biostatistics (or biometry) is the application of statistics to a wide range in biology. Bioinformatics covers the computer application in biotechnology After successful completetion of degree student able to go to higher education Like In Management field MBA(Biotechnology) PGDM (ABM) Agri Buisness management Technical field M.Tech (Biotechnology) M.Tech(Genetic Engineering) M.Tech(Agricultural Biotechnology) Medical Field Masteters In Medical Biotechnology at AIIMS The scope of these field is wide. +Nerd Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd +" skyhook is a misnomer? It seems to me that ""skyhook"" being an alias for a ""Space Elevator"" might be a bit of a misnomer, as sky-hook is often used to refer to the apparatus seen in the most recent Batman movie - do we have a reference for ""skyhook"" in terms of a space elevator? 192.35.35.35 " +"::Well, unfortunately it is POV to write about that in that way. Please, stop removing tags from article, when it is obvious that only you regard this article neutral. speaks " +I have reverted your edits. You should discuss this either on the individual talk pages or at Talk:U2. thanks +Puzzle for the world /Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Resignation is rather interesting. Naturally, I'm inclined to wonder about the validity of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley. Coren finds the idea of re-considering SB's votes in old cases uninteresting , presumably on the grounds that no conflict of interest could ahve occurred. I shall inquire of C directly whether he stands by that. The issue of Dbiv / Fys / BS's contributions comes up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dbiv shows nothing before but this is very clearly wrong. Where have Dbiv's early contribs gone (are they are yet another account names?). Who, if anyone, can remember where +Which is bullshit, if that aint his real name, then you got no reason. I think I proved that shit already now. Dheyward, stop it. Clowns is right. +This sounds like a confusion between the definitions of a Designated Hitter and a Pinch Hitter.74.67.17.22 +Arbitration Arbitration request has been filed by me today 23rd August naming you as involved party. +" Strong support. Confusion with Native American cuisine is no issue at all, and overwhelmingly the term ""Indian cuisine"", even in America, refers to cuisine of India. Your local Indian restaurant offers ""Indian cuisine"", and no one ever confuses it with Native American cuisine. Moreover, the term ""cuisine of India"" is not accurate, since it does not include the versions of Indian cuisine outside India, curries in Britain, for example. " +Matter I disagree with Ohms Law (WP contributor) assessment because energy is included in matter as well. What is the matter of Any (scientific) subject In the realm of relativity, matter can be equated to energy via the equation E = mc2. In the realm of cosmology, other forms of matter and energy, such as dark matter and dark energy are invoked to explain the behavior of the observable universe. +Racist ignorant and fascist all in all disgusting boy +Your edits to 2100 Don't be stupid. 2100 can also refer to a number, hence we shouldn't pretend that it doesn't, by redirecting in to 21st century. +" So Cassianto are stating that the information I added is ""non-neutrl.""? For the record, I added the fact that a 76 score on Metacritic constitutes a ""Generally Positive"" review according to Metacritic's own system. How is this my ""POV.""? As far as Aaliyah being a featured article, that does not mean you can bully good-faith editors like myself. There are no rules stating that I cannot make good-faith changes that are well-sourced. Don't change the subject- answer the question: Does, or does it not mean ""Generally Positive"" to have a 76 in Metacritic? And, if so, why am I not ""allowed"" to state that? " +Fuck off Will you please stop sending me messages? Let me be for fucks sake. Do you honestly have fuck all better to do with your fucking time? I'm not available for adoption, and even if I was I wouldn't fucking adopt you you piece of shit. Your grammar is fucking awful and your spelling is even fucking worse. Just fuck off. If you send me another fucking message I will fucking create account after fucking account so I can vandalise this piece of fucking shit page you have. Fuck off. +" I refer you to the ""How not to be a spammer"" section of Wikipedia:Spam: 3. The References section is for references. A reference directs the reader to a work that the writer(s) referred to while writing the article. The References section of a Wikipedia article isn't just a list of related works; it is specifically the list of works used as sources. Therefore, it can never be correct to add a link or reference to References sections if nobody editing the text of the article has actually referred to it. " +Graduation earns a Krannert MBA, plus a German MBA from LUH. +So according to you a news paper article from India is an opinion piece, since you are a hindoo indian, you should know that news papers are sources. Maybe you think since a hindoo news paper told something you dont like, it is an opinion piece. Well let the 4000 members of the sudhans take care of this. They can also post not just you two hindoos. Your reference to Sudhan and Sadozai is correct, however if you had taken the time to read the whole article before your two hindoos destryoed it, you would have know that it was in the article. BTW most Sudhans are white blue eyed blonds, while most hindoos are black. +Your absolute disregard of bed-rock rules of Wikipedia and copyright law and of ordinary rules of discourse and courtesy are not merely saddening but actively worrying. Reverting an edit has nothing to do with and says nothing what-so-ever about faithgood or badespecially corrections of mistakes regarding objective and clear-cut criteria. Your leaning upon claims of 'good faith' as a defence against being reverted for doing something that is wrong is not only utterly irrelevant but intellectually dishonest. If you view having your obvious mistakes reverted as some sort of attack upon yourself, perhaps you should either cease making those mistakes to avoid being disappointed or learn to deal with correction: meaningless claims regarding 'good faith' offers not the slightest immunity from scrutiny nor correction. +Image There is a request for an image here, is there a particular qualifier for this? Are we looking for a newer AMD K6-2 processor? An older 286? Or even older 8086? If we're just looking for any random processor, or a series of different ones, that can be easily arranged. +Professionals providing home care include licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, home health aides, physical therapists, occupational therapists and social workers. Rehabilitation services may be provided by physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language pathologists and dietitians.[citation needed] Professionals can be independent practitioners, part of a larger organization, or part of a franchise. Home care aides, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's), and caregivers are trained to provide non-custodial or non-medical care, such as help with dressing, bathing, getting in and out of bed, and using the toilet. They may also prepare meals, accompany the client to medical visits, grocery shop, and do various other errands +Depeche Mode vandalism Hi John, I noticed that you sought to bring a more balanced slant to the article, particularly the recent albums section. However, if you look into the edit history, you will see that there are repeated RVs by what I call wiki-trolls to re-instate unsubstantiated and negative commentary. I have taken pains to revert it back to your edit, but they keep vandalizing the page. It may be the same person under different names, but I can't tell. Is it possible for you to do something to halt their assaults on the page? Thanks, +with the data but the dates disappeared when they made delta.com more compatible for smart phones about a year ago +" In my region, ""bud"" is used exclusively to talk about marijuana flowers (buds). I see no reason why it should not be noted in this article. It is very relevant. -Anonymous 3/1/13" +There has been whole news reports written about the massive and extremely dangerous fuck ups of both the mainstream media and social media regarding their reporting of this event. It would be insanse for this article to simply pretend they never happened, not least on the patently false claim that such things are just a part of the ordinary standard of reportage generally (seriously?). +Thank you for your comments and valid points; I just didn't want this to be ignored if it was notable enough. +" I just saw what you wrote about me in the newsletter. LOL (I don't usually do that, the LOL bit, but I must be demented today)! I have received another request for a newsletter, so I've got to go make that. 110 " +I have just started to take a look, Peridon, but here's something that surprised me: the deleted userpage turns up on Google! In a very high position. I thought userpages didn't get indexed by search engines. Much less deleted uesrpages. Can you educate me? I'll be back after I do some more research. BTW I took a look at the deleted page (I can do that now!) and it's no wonder it was deleted. It was not only promotional and not encyclopedic - it was directly copied from here. from any other published source, not even your own. And the tone of the article has to be straightforward and neutral, giving the facts of your biography and career without any embellishment or drama. Read some other articles here about musicians and you will see what I mean. OK, that's some comments about HOW this was written. I am now researching WHETHER such an article should be here at all. Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia and it has to have standards for what kind of subjects can have articles here. The general standard is WP:GNG, which says that we only have articles about subjects that have been written about significantly by independent reliable sources. The specific standard for musicians is at WP:MUSICBIO. I'll be back shortly. +" Speedy deletion of Manilla River A tag has been placed on Manilla River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +" WWE has not said anything as of this time. Anything anyone says is purely speculation (which is not allowed on Wikipedia). aggio " +What I was trying to get at is that you've simply ignored the delete !votes based on a single poor source added by an SPA to arrive at a no concensus. I don't agree. Will you reconsider the outcome? +GOOD GUYS! Zap(Human) 1. Think Link, except in orange 2. Sword and other weapons have the electric element, yay! Dark Skitty(Skitty) 1. Skitty powers + hammer of squeakyness 2. Writer's Block! - Ultra Attack Ake(Human) 1. Spear Master >.> 2. MANGO!!! - Ultra Attack layze(Cryzee Dayzee) 1. Cryzee Dayzee powas 2. Suger Rush!!! Power up with suger Wave Snake(Human) 1. Massive Arsenal of guns 2. Bad Camoflauge - Ultra Attack Whispy Woods(Whispy Woods) 1. A tree with moving powers, yay! 2. Nature Call - Has nature help her in battle Blitzit(Human) 1. Spork Mage - Spork magic attacks 2. Spork Assult! - Ultra Attack Yoshidette(Yoshi) 1. Yoshi Powers! 2. 00ber Egg Shot - Ultra Attack Kracko(Kracko) 1. The powers of Kracko, yay! 2. CARA POWER! - Ultra Attack Matthwiz(Human) 1. Math Wizard!!! 2. Psi Math Omega - Ultra Attack Angry Luigi(Luigi) 1. Luigi, but pissed off, can tapdance 2. DAMNIT! - Ultra Attack Glooper(Human) 1. Jedi Master, yay! 2. WOOKIE!!! - Ultra Attack EVIL GUYS! Pikachu/PikaNG(Pikachu) 1. Pikachu powers! Yay! 2. Superiority Complex MonkeyWarlock(Monkey) 1. Powerful Warlock 2. Teleportation Abilitys Fungus(EB Mushroom) 1. EB Mushroom Powers, yay! XD 2. Spore Assault - Ultra Attack Jagged Dagger(Thief) 1. Thief powers! 2. Green Biker Dude powers! Panichurtz(Blue Mage) 1. Blue Mage Powers, da. 2. Grand Train - Ultra Attack - Ultimate Attack when used with Panihurtz Panihurtz(Blue Mage Girl) 1. Blue Mage Powers, da. 2. Grand Train - Ultra Attack - Ultimate Attack when used with Panichurtz 8-Bit(Fighter) 1. Sword Master 2. Sword Chucks!!! - Ultra Attack Domokun Lord(Domokun) 1. Domokun Powas! 2. Spam Assault - Ultra Attack - Ultimate Attack when used with Rog's Rog(Mario) 1. Mario, awesome dancing skills 2. Spam Assault! - Ultra Attack - Ultimate Attack when used with Domokun Lord's Surfing Vaporeon(Vaporeon) 1. Vaporeon Powers! 2. Tsunami - Ultra Attack Mudkip Fan(Mudkip) 1. Mudkip powers of doom! 2. 1337 speak! - Ultra Attack Kain(Dragoon) 1. Dragoon Powers 2. Jump attack of painfulness - Ultra Attack +Main Villain? Am I the only person who does not believe Henderson is the season's main villain? Really this season did not have one person that was equatable to a Marwan or a Saunders. If one person had to be picked, it would have to be Logan. His role in the conspiracy was very comparable to Kingsley, and the two shared a similar relationship with Graham and Max respectively. So if one main villain had to be picked, I would say it's Logan. - +" You should re-word your warning: ""I am from Wikipedia and I will NOT stand for truth in these pages!""" +(talk) 20:57, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) +Too bad Danny boy, I'm back! D 94.4.73.221 +" Hello, I did post a source from the UN. It's called a reference. It is from a guide that refers to discrimination. It was posted after you changed the introduction to reflect your point of view, but before you suggested ""you didn't provide a source from the UN"". I feel that you are neither polite nor seeking compromise on this issue. " +Big deal. Go ahead and block. I will see to it that you are blocked. +Maryland Silver Spring and Columbia are both CDP/ Unincorporated Communities. Do they count? 71.176.166.170 +The rationale was to state the real position of the SPCS, not the read into position of some one who does not hold to SPCS objectives and edited out that which he did not agree with. Disambiguation? +I object. And, I am particularly disturbed at the idea of an editor unilaterally merging articles with no discussion whatsoever, and with not even the courtesy of putting a proposed merger tag on articles they think should be merged. I take it from the comments above that this is a pattern that you follow. I also take it that it has created problems for you in the past. I would thing that should give you pause, but apparently not. +"Wow! Thanks for the incredibly kind write-up in your nomination. After reading it, I'd vote for me, too ) (deal) " +I think from time to time, not faster than once per 1-2 years. +" Reply Thank you for the advice. I will keep that in mind while editing, even though my friend mentioned the same thing you said over and over again. She can be very annoying sometimes. Talk Let's go Lightning! " +Why thankyou Iknow23 ;DDDD and you should really ask for a vote if the featured single should go in. It isn't just YOUR article...just because you got it to fl, doesn't mean you know whats best! and haha, yves, what a ledge ') I think there's need for it to go on its own, as its not HER single, she's just a FEATURED artist +" Advice We cannot display copyright material, even temporarily. The blanking template on the article gives you a link to a temporary page where you can draft a new article. Please note that: Minor rewording is not enough to avoid a breach of copyright - see Wikipedia:Copy-paste You will need to establish notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but must be demonstrated by showing ""significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."" Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The notability standard for academics is explained at WP:Notability (academics). Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view. You should take care to avoid a promotional tone and PR-speak ""peacock terms"" like ""highly respected"" and ""prestigious"". There is good advice at WP:Your first article. " +I see your talkpages under your prior name, to the extent that you deleted them while using your prior name. Also, should I wish to search for edits by others that relate to you (as you were previously named), I need to know the name(s). +problems with the foreskin? every body part can have problems. Name one body part that has less problems with the foreskin? you can't. Penile cancer is extremely rare, so are male UTIs. It's like 1 in 100,000 whereas one in three women are at risk of breast cancer. Gee, by your standards, all women should have massectomies. How is it that people like you even exist (not an insult, just a question) to where you would prefer to chop off a healthy body part rather than make sure it gets taken care of and cleaned. Might as well chop off every little girl's laibeas. 70.114.38.167 +|action5=GAR |action5date=22:24, 1 June 2014 |action5link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Sword of Shannara/1 |action5result=kept |action5oldid=606506788 +Blake is correct that sourcing is not needed for the average plot section. But sourcing it has been a practice within the VG project for a couple of years now. The obsession to source plot sections in video games stems from the project's push to get articles to FA status. Among the laundry list of complaints and objections we encountered at FACs, sourcing was one of them. The idea was to source everything to be better safe than sorry. In short, adding proper sources to the plot section is never a bad idea, but there's no need to dig extensively to do so. ( talk ) +" I disagree with this as it is currently incorrect. There is presently no political entity with the designation ""Palestine"". Why not also say Gaza City, Gaza Strip, Sameria, Palestine? The most neutral designation of the moment is Gaza City, Gaza Strip. 1:03PM, 18 May 2004 (PDT)" +dude whats your problem dude i was being serious on the last one sorry dick head eat my shit +I have no idea as to what you're talking about. 75.85.112.149 +The Afd voting process left votes for keep and you views were rejected by the majority. Please take your black bead and start a new page somehwere else. You have not only failed to honor the views of the majority, at the first opporutnity, you were disruptive and blanked the page. Thou art banished from this page. See Cherokee Clans section on voting for an explanation. +Orange 1969 picture Whatdya think? +GA It is neutral and is of a suitable length, it is not part of an edit war, it covers the major aspects of the topic and it, as far as I can tell, has not been the subject of vandalism. +VAndalism WHAT I DID WAS ADD LINKS?!?!?!?! how is that vandalism +" Blocked You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. (roger that) " +douch bag Thats you. +Alright, DRMAGIC, I am sorry. I will state here then that she is very pretty. I am sorry to offend you, Mr./ Ms. Opinion Censor. Allow me to bow and kiss your feet. +Why didn't you block me for sockpuppetry too? +Assumptions of bad faith are not assumptions when there's a pointless and groundless CfD launched at me, and RMs closed with me as the closer's rationale; never mind all the stupid things being said and alleged the ANI (which I'm de-watchlisting; anything I say there gets little respect anyway and defending yourself is a stroke against you, in the previous ANI I was directly told to shut up and that I had no right to speak there). +Hi Sir, How are you, my name is harrybabbar..can we talk...would like to discuss Singh article with you. +Deletion at Memills' talk page was inadvertent Because it was similar to the material on my own Talk page, sire, and I had been going back and forth between the two, I mistakenly thought that I was deleting a comment on my own page. Thanks for noticing. +" ""Somebody, go write one."" Do it yourself lazy.129.139.1.68 " +Personal poem I have left you a personal poem on your user page. There is no need to pay me for this service. +I have never 'vandalised' an article on 'Cattle' I must say that I found your note to me somewhat offensive as I never vandalised wikipedia or even looked at the article you refer to - on cattle. It may be that every AOL user comes up the same (as we sem to be classified as multiple users) but rest assured I have not done anything untoward. Ben +"==The unfinished state of this article== This article was created as a subpage of Animal testing because of the need to use summary style there. That means there is currently only one incident discussed here, which looks a bit odd given the title. Hopefully in time others will be added. (talk)(contribs) " +" What you were up to, you mean. From the beginning you're personally attacking me and harassing me, and this is the only way you found to try to claim ownership of articles. And yes, it's highly suspicious that you seem to monitor everything that happens between the IP and me. At worst, it shows that you're actually tracking down my edits, ie harassing me, at best, it proves you are the IP because without any communication with me or the IP, there is no way you can be aware of anything in so much details(unless you're harassing me). And no, that you happen to hear about this matter right after it occured, while nothing suggested you were active here for 2 days, cannot be coincidence. And finally, please, Buspar, stop playing on words. This is what the admin that took in charge your SSP case stated, and nothing else: ""Looking at contribs, User:Buspar and User:Xuanwu are very probably the same user. Technically, they cannot be socks, as one username was created after the other stopped editing"". This statement is based on the technical definition of sockpuppetry, meaning that a person is using different identities at the same time. The admin only noted that the 2 accounts were not used simultaneously, but nonetheless acknowledged that Buspar and Xuanwu were the same person (""Looking at contribs, User:Buspar and User:Xuanwu are very probably the same user."") The admin, however, never confirmed that you were not the IPs Onethirtyeightdot suspected you to be. If you've seen the line ""No, Buspar is not 130.49.157.75"", then please source it correctly. So, what do we have ? An admin confirming you're likely to use several identities, an anonymous IP acting in exactly the same way as you do, having the same personal issues with me, editing the very same articles as you do, reverting back into articles the very same contribs that you made, and it also seems both you and the IP seem to have a telepathic link allowing to know every issue occuring with the IP without you being contacted by it beforehand. As I've said, I'm offering to peacefully resolve this problem. I am sincerely convinced that Buspar is the IP, because I've noticed the very same edit pattern, because both users contribute to the same articles, and both users seem to have a personal issue against me and both seem to systematically revert my contributions as soon as they concern article about illegal downloading. Thus, this is not randmon bad faithed accusation. This is only what I sincerely believe. However, if it is absolutely proved that Buspar and the Ip are not the same and that Buspar and the IP don't behave in similar ways, then I'm ready to make excuses to both users and to stop identifying the Ip as Buspar. But if someone has any doubts about the IP identity, or if someone clearly acknowledge that Buspar and the Ip have the very same behavior and edit pattern, then that's all I need. I won't continue to call the IP Buspar, on the condition that an admin clearly acknowledges the IP¨as being Buspar, and that Buspar in his future edits, only revert edits of mine and talk to me under his Buspar username. " +September 2008 Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — (Talk contribs) +, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 16:23 +The Third Trine The third trine consists of the Tiger, Horse, and Dog. These three signs seek a true lover, and are like-minded in their pursuit of humanitarian causes. Each is a gifted orator and excels at verbal communication. Relationships and personal contact are of highest priority and each one seeks their intimate soul mate. Idealistic and impulsive, the Tiger, Horse and Dog follow the beat of their own drummer. Defiant against injustice, these three signs wilt without large amounts of physical affection and loyal support for causes. They are productive, enthusiastic, independent, engaging, dynamic and honourable. They can also be rash, rebellious, quarrelsome, hot-headed, reckless, anxious, moody, disagreeable, and stubborn. Although these three signs are loyal, they can be very protective when lied to. The three signs do not enjoy being told what to do, but will listen when it is a person they love or trust whole-heartedly. Dog (Yang, 3rd Trine, Fixed Element Metal): Honest, intelligent, straightforward, loyal, sense of justice and fair play, attractive, amicable, unpretentious, sociable, open-minded, idealistic, moralistic, practical, affectionate, dogged. Can be cynical, lazy, cold, judgmental, pessimistic, worrier, stubborn, quarrelsome. Tiger (Yang, 3rd Trine, Fixed Element Wood): Unpredictable, rebellious, colorful, powerful, passionate, daring, impulsive, vigorous, stimulating, sincere, affectionate, humanitarian, generous. Can be restless, reckless, impatient, quick-tempered, obstinate, selfish. +Does not explicitly call him a fascist. Your extrapolation is again, a vio or OR. +re-write process I am currently re-writing this article, but section by section, because I have almost very little time. I have already updated some sections, and i am preparing others also, so this article still is a draft.please be patient. +. Please see 2014 Crimean crisis for reference on the monopoly of russian nicknames adding pro russian bias to the article. +wOW! i'M BLOCKED! sHAME ON ME! LOLZ. tHAT WAS FUNNY. +As I've said, I think your ideas are reasonable; I've made the few constructive suggestions I had; go for it. | Talk 06:07, May 6, 2005 (UTC) Due to a formating problem please post above this sentence until further notice. Thanks, Jay. +== YOU ARE THE GAYEST KID IN THE FUCKING WORLD. ==''']]www.gay.comyour super super super gay. +" you're so fucking ugly are you walter's bitch? he's another fat ugly loser prick on this site. I can't believe how retarded you look faggot. guess what? I found out where you live. go ahead and block this ip. I won't be on it anymore. anyone in the future who uses it won't be me. you are wrong and can't handle the truth. you go around undoing good work but never contributing good work. just bad reverts and edits. I've followed a lot of your edits and errors and see that you're so inconsistent and incorrect. no one will call you out cus you're a dick sucker and an ass licker on here. you think you're all that but you're dirt which is why you have to compensate with being a bully on here! you're not consistent or logical. I've found dozens of articles that have listings of people from shows to parades to other activities and events considered ""significant"". you go around following articles some editors contribute on and put notices at the top and remove their work, even after it's been there for years all cus you're a sore pussy loser with no dick. you suck off other men to make yourself feel better about how much of a loser you are. you think you're important going and undoing work. I have a zillion ips and i'm an admin. I could take you down but i'll do that off this site. you're gonna wish you never fucked with me and my crew on here. you're a meaningless worthless dick head. you are a piece of shit. fuck off and die, I won't read your stupid notices or replies. fuck off, I could care less. I won't be at this location anymore. matter of fact, the location that shows up on ip search is just a ""bounce off"" location to throw people like you off. not even in the city or state but it is ""registered"" there. haha, joke is on you hong kong ding dong! i'm already using other ips to edit articles you don't watch or track dip shit! good luck, I could care less about the articles I've worked on and you undid cus you have no life. p.s. do what's best for Wikipedia like you claim to do, not get jealous and mad so in an effort to get revenge you go and undo work out of spite. shit has already been confirmed so you can either do the work or stop undoing edits and acting like a know-it-all asshole! you're unproductive and annoying. you're a psycho with serious mental issues and need to be put away! you don't have to like the content, doesn't give you a right to undo it cus just cus you're a prick and delete-ist! ever heard of a talk page for dispute resolution and consensus? think that rules doesn't apply to you kiss ass? want me to end your wanna-be career on here? go away and stop your bullshit or else! and yeah, that's a threat. so block this ip for awhile. won't affect me one bit white trash weird al looking nigger! and who cares if someone WAS a fan or not. 90% of people who edit an article are ""fans"" or experts about the topic. grow up and go jerk yourself off, rub the cum in your long curly gross greasy looking hair and call it a life! do you own a gun? use it on your face! lmfao" +" Your question to Mongo It's perfectly normal to delete the talk page of a deleted page. And as for the protection, well it's hard to believe that that's a genuine question from someone who innocently and genuinely is wondering and has no intent to harass and annoy another user. I'll give you a little piece of advice it you want to avoid being blocked for disruption and harassment. If someone deletes something from his own talk page, assume that he has read it and do NOT attempt to repost it. If you are sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia to be able to check logs and know who deleted or protected a particular page, then you are also have sufficient knowledge to be able to work out for yourself why the page you refer to was deleted and protected, whether or not you agree with the decision. ♫ " +" ntributions/164.58.104.33|Explain all these edits then please?]] [[User:Momusufan|Momo" +Windows ME I wasn't the one who put that in the article, I was merely quoting that from the existing article so that my comments about that would make sense. +Wikipedia claims it is an unreliable source From Wikipedia's WP:RS: Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources Main page: Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources. Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, obituaries, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews or summaries, but should not be used in place of secondary sources for detailed discussion. Although Wikipedia articles are tertiary sources, Wikipedia employs no systematic mechanism for fact checking or accuracy. Because Wikipedia forbids original research, there is nothing reliable in it that isn't citable with something else.Thus Wikipedia articles (or Wikipedia mirrors) are not reliable sources for any purpose. I thought the above was a misread, the first time I read it. However, it supports why College Professors and teachers discourage using Wikipedia for academic research. It also means that editors, administrators and others involved with creating articles, are in fact, wasting thier time. The only person who can gain from Wikipedia, is the fuck-head, money beggar, Jimbo Wales. So all of you who want to edit war, keep it up, you're wasting your fucking time, for nothing. After doing a scan of the Whitman article, since the inclusion and copying of Lavergne's book and other sources, the article is only about 20% accurate. And yes, I am John Moore, who was Houston McCoy's power of attorney, who helped him until Wikipedia came between us when I tried to correct information - a long time ago, and his daughter got involved and help fuel the flames that could have been put out with a reasonable conclusion, if the above info would have been known at the time. But Whitman was my research subject, I helped McCoy because he needed it, he in turn lied to me on several occasions, but I can forgive him for that, at least he had a forgivable condition. Jimbo Wales and Wikipedia, are a sickness unto themselves. So Pinkafuckup and YGLEE and other IP's who know nothing, have an admin ban me, PLEASE! It won't be necessary, but then, your edit wars were not necessary either. Keep on being the knee pads that Jimbo Smells wants - you deserve!!!2001:558:6007:27:7992:7DA3:D702:EE6A +Thaks, Arzel. Here's a quote from the above Wikilink:...dog meat is usually associated with the Minahasa, an ethnic group in northern Sulawesi, and Bataks of northern Sumatra, who consider dog meat to be a festive dish....-WIKIPEDIA +I am a registered sex offender and I like to touch myself in public places +i don't understand, how do you edit the last paragraph? i ended up editing the one above thanks Jay +I don't know what that last comment means...this is not a matter that is in dispute..Philbin writes about the fact himself. What is the problem??? +F_UC*CK YOU COCKSU*_CKING MOTHERFU*_CCKER +Imperialist bastards... ... +Oppose Taiwan is synonymous with the whole country. 207.81.170.99 +US president Denis O'Sullivan, eh? Cy +Tim - I seem to spend an enormous amount of time formatting these templates, but I actually think they are really useful, so I'm glad to see someone else is interested. One of my largest frustrations is a failure to distinguish people requested images of people from places and requested photograps of places. As a photographer, if I visit a city, it's easy for me to look through the category, see which places are in need of photographing, and then go out and take the photos. That's not the case with celebrities, athletes or politicians from a city, which I'm unlikely to just run into. I've tried to create some Category:Wikipedia requested images of people from City X subcategories to clean up the base categories Category:Wikipedia requested images of City X but it's a lot of work. I made a Wikipedia:Bot_requests/Archive_61#Wikipedia_requested_photographs_in_X_.3E_Wikipedia_requested_photographs_of_people_of_X request for a bot to do this but it didn't seem to get much support. Any thoughts on this? +OMG....are you slow man??? I AM NOT MAKING PERSONAL ATTACKS! Comments that you disagree with DO NOT constitute personal attacks. Yes I realize that I just said that you were slow but I am just making a point saying that it is taking you a while to get a point that I have repeatedly said. The reliable sources are the founders....if you want to talk to them then fine. Go do that but dont be close minded....yes you are....about stuff that you dont even know all about. There is plenty of other useless crap here on wikipedia that you can go delete or edit or whatever because its not valid, reliable, or whatever. Hell, some of it isnt even stuff that is real....yet you allow there to be posts about it? How is that encyclopedic? +OK. Glinsk is uninhabited now but there is a lot of current activity there with a proposed hydroelectric/wind farm scheme planned for it (no controversy planned!) and also that people here want Corrib Gas to re-site themselves to it. I may move it to Kilcommon rather than Erris maybe if that's OK. +" (i) Wikipedia (Spanish or English, FA or not) can not be used as a reference. (ii) While the numbers vary too much, we may not just say ""I believe 2 mil is the best choice, so I put it"". This is called original research. " +Your obedient servant +Please read my reply +" Died instantly? The article claims that ""Cerna died instantly"". The source provided is an article on snopes.com. However, the source does not claim that Cerna ""died instantly"". I know that a shot in the temple is usually fatal, but there have been cases where people died only later or even in some rare cases survived. Therefore I am not completely convinced that Cerna did indeed die instantly. Does anybody have sources which claim this? Otherwise, the sentence should be deleted." +" I have directed various Ip users here for discussion. Please note In addition to the Official website The London theatre site also says 10 up. Scot " +have some knowledge of this subject. I +I'm sorry. I'd like to unreservedly retract my previous statement. You are not in any conceivable way a sad, pathetic loser with nothing better to do with your life than going around trying to censor other people's points of view. I am truly sorry if I in any way suggested or implied that this was the case. +Thanks mate. It seems that is willing and able to make the barnstars and awards also, so that should hopefully be done soon. Cheers, +Nope - unemployement in the UK is at its highest level ever with EIGHT MILLION adults unemployed. (92.12.20.168 ) +" Hmm, sneaky sneaky... my MSN disregarded my turning off it's popup blocker and still put your email in the junk mail section. Oh well, thanks for the input! And if you were to become an admin... again... I'd support. D o " +":::a-ha, so argue rectitude of original edit inadvisable as subservience to overriding need for stability in project more important than who is right and who is wrong in deciding matter. information which arguably not belong allowed to stay in interest of politics of site. is odd policy, but understand now where was wrong in interpretation. strict adhering to rules also not advisable, yes? is possible for small acts of not meeting standards to sum in large benefit for project. is possible for at first glance benign material to viewed as contentious (for instance, if Patton Oswalt listed as actor in movie but was someone else, is contentious, yes? if information not sourced, is possible), but is neither here or there. is only small point to make. is odd phrasing for original research article toois basis of entire fields that fusing pieces of known information into new information possiblebut believe i understand where was wrong. if say, for instance, Patton Oswalt man because appear to be from picture, is not original research because is verifiable in other source, even if source not given, yes? to then apply male adjective to him not out of order then because uses male gender in self-reference. simple question though: would taking these piece of information and adding statement to affect, ""Patton Oswalt identifies as male,"" from inference of things be original research? would be silly to make note of this in article of course, but is only example. believe i understand now where interpretation and implementation of interpretation went wrong. will make all effort to avoid repetition of transgression. thank you, administrator Monty. you are very helpful person. " +Image:Caernarfonstation.jpg Hello Stewart - took me a while to find my diary. The photo was taken on Wednesday, August 10th. 2005. Rosser1954 +ANI discussion Hello, . This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. +| decline=Procedural decline: you will need to follow the unblock instructions that you are provided when you try to edit (✉→''''''←✎) +" Forget about that ђɥл₮₴Ṝ " +Geiger counter photo Boffy, We hope to used your Geiger counter photo in a book. Would love to have a copy of this sent to youcan you contact me? My details: Frederick T. Courtright, President The Permissions Company, Inc. 47 Seneca Road P. O. Box 604 Mount Pocono, PA 18344 570.839.7477 - vox 570.839.7448 - fax PermDude@eclipse.net www.permissionscompany.com +- I WANT AN ANSWER YOU SON OF A BITCHES. +and for the flamming your flamming and your going to get block for all the crap you do, counting my page that you vandalize. starting trolling with me by vandaling my page. Listen I understand that you may not have as many as me but, there are people on wiki who have 5 times more then me. So stay off my page and i'll stay off your, stay out of my way and i'll stay out your. +" Does it not depend on what you compare it to? We have the largest and third largest university in the country here so the city must rank high. I can't see it being bigger than London because they have several universities but London is nothing like Greater Manchester so what are you comparing Greater Manchester to? ┌''''''┐└chat┘ " +get a life.do you thing only underage teenegers do sexting? What planet are you from? 65.35.249.125 +Episode 109 and it was not the theme song, it was the song that the band was playing during the white noise machine instigated dream sequence. carol +Hi, My name is Subramanian ( Subbu for short). It is only recently that I came to know that AYikudi Bala Subramanyar, of the village Ayikudi, near Tenkasi, near Tirunelveli is our Kula Deivam. ANd the I did make a visit to the temple. WHile my visit was memorable, I thought a lot needs to be done to bring back the lost glory. For example the temple tank and surroundings need some real cleaning. The temple also needs some face lift. SO this mail is an attempt to first get hold of all like minded people who have visited this temple and those who value this temple highly either because of ancestral liks or otherwise. In a way this is an attempt to create a commuinty and later on we can decide collectively on what can be done. SO who ever +Richie Branson Deletion Hello, you have now become a reference on how discrimination on Wikipedia can be justified within Wikipedia, but not within general public consensus. You Deleted a valid topic not based on facts but on the basis of a few spiteful Wikipedia account holders that discriminate against minorities. The topic clearly met WP:BAND standards and did chart yet you proceeded to delete. We are just letting you know we observed what you did and you are now part of our investigation. +" Surnames of allegèdly Bukhar[i]an Jews Am I the only one who is mystified by the very Russian-sounding names of such supposèdly Bukharan Jews as Abramoff, Leviev, Moussaieff, Alazarov, etc? Are these people actually Bukharans with Russified surnames? Or are they actually Ashkenazim who happened to have ambled into Bukhara over the past century (as their surnames seem to indicate)? Does anyone know? talk " +She's denied the rumors Proof ( +It was who said we should model the behavior we would like to see in others. That's some of the best advice I've ever seen on this site. +Copyedit request Hi, I'm looking for a copyeditor for Homer Simpson. I've been working on the article for a while and although I was hoping it would be longer than it is, I've pretty much hit a wall and I doubt there is a lot more I can add (other than some analysis). So in order to get it ready for a FAC (probably in late September), it needs some copyediting and I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks for your time, 0422 +Thank you for your help Thank you for your help regarding +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, you will be blocked. – talk " +Your independent sources are not serious unfortunately. I believe it because of that I live in central-Europe. +" I am glad that your target-oriented and very successful behavior has been acceptable all along. " +notices Would appreciate if you'd stop spamming my discussion page with those. Also, I've initiated a discussion in the article before you. +" Let us ""sport"" in the title according to pattern, although personally I believe ""competition"" is the more precise term (scope is clear from intro). " +Welcome to wikipedia before you get sterted you have to learn how to make articles and a bunch of other stuff +Deletion discussion about Frank jimzzi Hello, Frank mike efe, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Frank jimzzi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank jimzzi . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, +RE: Fanta logo That was the only one I could get. I thought the cans where good but users didnt like it. TLK | Y! +Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Biopollution level. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. (talk) +Fuck you you bitch ass ho. +Ive written it down here. Poor guy, his first moves in Wikipedia were blocked by Wiki admins... I can imagine what is going here around other articles, which are in the sphere of interest of other groups. Looks like its not bout science or education but politics and informational war... +Obviously there IS a reason you know nothing know it all female ejaculator. EVERYTHING has a reason you idiot, even the stuff you dont agree with, like the holocaust, and the hilarious black enslavement of the 1500s to 1993. I hate females who ejaculate, they make my penis cry in pain and so in order to defend my manhood I must attack and destroy these half men half women serbian jew double bloods before they breed again. +This thing about Mary is utter bullshit. Everyone knows Jesus is a goat. +The old taxobox template? Hi! I know you are busy with the cactus, but I hope you can help me out. On the Norwegian Wikipedia, we have since the beginning used a taxobox without ranks. This has been due to early influence from a single editor, which has since gone unchallenged until a year ago or so. Now, we finally have the consensus to change over to a ranked system, the only problem is that there seem to be no-one capable (or willing) of doing the coding of something as complex as a taxo-box. The bio-editors over at Norwegian WP are just just a handful of people, all of which seem to be as techically inclined as yours truly. So, I had the bright idea to import and translate the old (non-auto) taxobox from English. I don't know anything about coding, but since the ranks are in latin, I suppose it should be possible to understand what bits need translation. The only problem is, I don't know how to find the code. Do you have access to it? If so, would it be possible for you to post the code on this test page? +John Murray, 1st Marquess of Atholl Nice work Hayter! I've done a bit o' wikifying on it too! -) (talk) +Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Compromise of 1850. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Boy +" For what it's worth, neither the Chinese, Korean or Japanese Wikipedias abbreviate the title using ""blah blah"" or any of the other alternatives, precisely because they would probably think it would be stupid to have a title which had ""blah blah"" in it." +It was suggested by an administrator that this controversial material was removed (although his reversion failed to actually remove it). Why must you insist on putting it back? +Sorry I misunderstood your edit summary, I see what you were getting at now. If Oswald's name is to be omitted, I'm fine with that as long as it is for reasons that have to do with something besides worrying about the conspiracy nuts. WP doesn't cater to the birthers or flat earthers or 911 truthers so it shouldn't cater to assassination nuts. +the category was unnecesary, as explained in my edit summary. Your threats are disgrace to wikipedia. +It would have better context as the 2nd-to-last paragraph of Epidemiology. +" Don't thank me, thank . I just scheduled it to be put on the Main Page. Good job on that article btw -) Regards Why " +Please, explain Based on and yours For now, I've fully-protected Jasenovac i Gradiska Stara, Ante Starcevic, Petar Brzica, Ljubo Miloš and Magnum Crimen for one month, all on the wrong version. I'm sorry I can't help with checkuser, but hopefully it'll give us all a break. It seems that there's always some childish POV edit-war going on around these subjects, and I have a huge sympathy and respect for those neutral, uninvolved editors who work in these areas. Regards, EyeSerenetalk please, explain what exactly you are protecting here and why? What is the 'childish POV edit-war' here? For each article counted above explain on its talk page what is 'childish POV' there. Support it by valid knowledge of each subject. +" The Korean media still uses the word Comfort Women for modern day sex workers serving US military camps. (Antitrafficking Policies in Asia and the Russian Far East: A Comparative Perspective by Schuckman, Emily E). * Unless anyone can come up with a name, full references and a citation, the 410,000 should be removed as per Wikipedia policy. (Clue: the reason no one has put their name to it is clear if you read the actual source for it ... no historian dares put their name nor institution on it.). The Youtube mourning song is not according to policy either. * Historically, the use of the word for the licensed, voluntary system of prostution came place first and should come first in the topic. When, how and upon what scale the forcible recruitment tooks place is unclear. Its appears to have started as a ""rational"" response to a major problem and then exaggerated as the war years went on. The article needs to look more accurately at the sequence of event NOT the politicized version of them since. * Can anyone come up with actual figures or proportions of a) those women that worked voluntarily or because they had no other options b) those taken forcibly How and when did the system change? * Missing elements; a) the local agents, criminal underworlds and government bureaucracies that became involved, i.e. both Chinese and Korean b) the roots or context of the phenomenon, e.g. women in the slave caste of Korea, the system of local agents in Asia buying and selling daughters (it equally existed in Japan as well). c) its legacy afterwards in the industrialization of the Korean sex industry after WWII, e.g. the same comfort women working in prostitution for the American occupational forces and the Korean army. To state the obvious, the women and system did not just disappear post-WWII. d) The reason and role of General Park Chung Hee's regime, the Korean Censorship Board etc in the suppression discussion of the issue leading to the burial of the issue until it arose again in the 80s and 90s. " +Adele Carles Hello, I've restored the article at (speak to me) . +" The bot cannot directly replace characters in links, as it would break the link. The first stage, running now, is going through a lot of pages in the Geography of Romania category and moving the page to the correct title, then correcting all mentions of it. The second stage simply corrects the characters outside of links. Sadly, it is not possible to combine the two tasks easily, and it would be very risky. By the end, all those pages should be corrected. tion9 " +The vandalism was the insertion into the page of a controversial issue which has no bearing on the subject of the page. The material had evidently been inserted because some previous editors erroneously believed and took at face value some recent propaganda published by a Seattle public relations firm that had no connection to the subject. The previous editors evidently adopted the unwarranted assumption that the propaganda amounted to a verified fact. +Vh1 Classic Tribute Vh1 Classic is having a weekend dedicated to Micheal it should be added to a tribute section. +Neutrality dispute tag I removed the neutrality dispute tag from the article as I see no comments here related to a neutrality dispute. +Harl3quin... working on walkthru now, will post later 212.183.134.210 +fuck you asshole wipe my ass homo +Black Jesus I think he is BLACK JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +I'm not sure who told you that, but it's not true. The U.S. imports 12 million barrels of oil each day, and exports 5 million. Vietnam is a net exporter of oil, and you'll have to do your own homework on the other two (but I'll tell you none of the three you mention is in the top 15 list of oil importers or consumers). Start here: Petroleum#Petroleum_by_country if you want to see the sources. It all comes from the CIA, not some commie plot machine. Now, please refer to wp:talk to see the policy telling us that article talk pages are for discussing ideas that can be incorporated into the article, rather than general forums. +" Merging Red Hand of Doom and Reliability issue Given that there's not alot of information regarding RHoD I'm not sure I agree that it deserves it's own article. Given that I do think it belongs in Wikipedia, and suggest merging and redirecting it with a new article on other similarly-themed D&D; modules. This would have the advantage of 1) allying yourself with other editors with articles in this category, and 2) being able to gather all the secondary sources in one place to address notability concerns. I was thinking about this last night and had the idea that it could fit with 3rd edition modules with a generic setting. That would be a pretty good list of modules; take a look at List of Dungeons & Dragons adventures, and we should be able to gather a good number of secondary sources. I'd be happy to put in work on this. Also I'd like to get the issue of whether or not some of the secondary sources being used by D&D; editors that the deletionists view as ""fansites"" are indeed reliable sources. I'll be happy to put in the work or collaborate on this if you would gather up a list of the disputed sources you have been using. I think other people, such as user:webwarlock, might be interested also. We could submit the case to wp:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and then notify Jack and Gavin so they can see what's going on and make their own arguments. If it can't be resolved there then we can kick it up to informal mediation by the mediation cabal. I believe this action alone can go a long way toward settling many of these issues for a number of D&D; and other rpg editors. What do you think? " +" YOUR WISH IS MY COMMAND I made a (rather poor quality) youtube video of my own version of the Buckminster Fuller Jitterbug; look up The Polyflex says ""Hello World"" on YouTube. I would have just linked my youtube video directly, but the URL triggered wikipedia's protection filter. I used to make them in my home in Santa Cruz, California when I was a UCSC student, then sell them to toy stores all over the Monterey and San Francisco Bay Areas. I started making them after a friend gave me his, as he had to cut down on his stuff before moving away to Canada. After a few minutes of my playing with this toy, he realized how much fun it really was and asked for it back. I'm pretty sure that Fuller invented them. I have both volumes of Synergetics; they're really cool but don't make a whole lot of sense." +Catholic butchers to Evangelicals again Search Home · Who Are We · Local Ministries · Contact Us Main Menu · Home · Feedback · Recommend Us · Search · Stories Archive · Surveys Categories · All Categories · Israel · Palestine · Jordan · Egypt · Syria · Lebanon · North Africa · Persian Gulf · Other · Features · Opinion · Top Stories Survey Do you think the US political involvement in the Middle East is good for the Christian Witness? Yes, indeed. In some countries In most cases it is bad Results Polls Votes: 455 Comments: 0 Search Lebanon: Catholic Villagers attack and vandalize Baptist Church Posted on 29 August, 2006 Maronite Catholics attacked a newly-built, independent Baptist church near Beirut this month, mauling churchgoers preparing to host war refugees from southern Lebanon. The violence flared up after of several weeks of tense public debate between Maronite and Baptist clergy. More than 20 men from Ajaltoun village attacked Christ Bible Baptist Church on August 2, slashing car tires, breaking the church door and windows, stealing computer and sound equipment, beating men and groping several women. Compass Direct, Aug 22, 2006 A group of 10 Maronite men assaulted Baptist Pastor Raymond Abou-Mekhael and another church member at 6:30 p.m. as they were on their way to retrieve items from their parked cars. The Maronites broke the unidentified church member’s rib and both men’s glasses, smashed the car windows and then dumped the two men inside before joining another group of 10 in attacking the church building. “Police were at the church watching everything,” Abou-Mekhael, 35, told Compass. “They even advised the attackers on what to steal and vandalize.” Abou-Mekhael said that the men were led by Ajaltoun Mayor Khalil Tabet, who had the church officially sealed off with “red wax” immediately after the attack so that no one could enter the building. In an August 6 newspaper article entitled, “No Justification for Building a Baptist Church in a Region whose Overwhelming Majority is Maronite,” the local Maronite bishop attacked the Baptist church’s right to exist. Bishop Guy-Paul Noujaim wrote in local newspapers that there were “no followers of the Baptists in Ajaltoun,” and the “decrees of the Middle East Council of Churches [to which the church does not belong] prohibit building a church in areas without followers therein.” In an e-mail to Compass, Bishop Noujaim said that the Baptist congregation had requested a permit to build a residence but had instead built a church. He declined to answer questions about whether he had been aware of plans to attack the church on August 2, but said that he had been celebrating mass at a church in the mountains when he received a telephone call alerting him to the violence. In articles published in Addiyar and Annahar newspapers, the bishop called for the attorney general to close down the building. “This is nonsense,” said Salim Sahyouni, President of the High Council of Evangelical Churches in Syria and Lebanon, to which the Ajaltoun Baptist church belongs. “We can worship in a legal church building, we can worship in an apartment and we can worship in the free air.” As a Protestant community in Lebanon, “we have the full rights to build churches to worship freely in any place we choose,” Sahyouni told Compass. “We do not need to get permission.” Worship Rights In his written responses to Compass, Bishop Noujaim did not specify why it was illegal to hold church services in a home but claimed that the Baptists were violating the law by owning a printing press in the basement of their building. The bishop’s biggest complaint was that the Baptists aimed to steal Maronite members of his flock. “Why don’t the Baptists want to be part of the Middle East Council of Churches?” the bishop wrote, referring to an ecumenical council of Orthodox, Catholic and certain Protestant churches that he said forbids proselytizing each other’s members. “Don’t they support ecumenism and dialogue? If we are mistrustful of the Baptist people, it is because of their bad behavior.” The bishop did not respond to questions about whether individuals in Ajaltoun had the +Guys, I've played this a lot in the past few months and I know for sure the hobbits don't kick. Legolas, Aragorn and Faramir kick; the hobbits and Gimli push, and Gandalf pushes with his staff. By the way, is this game even based on the film? It doesn't have any music from The Return of the King, it has music from the first two films only. I found the levels The South Gate, The Pelennor Fields and The Black Gate pretty pathetic; they clearly weren't at all taken from the films. +Jprg, you are well respected member, Probably impossible to understand by anyone, who lied to you so that you protect a misogynist RooshV who was named the most hated man in the world, part of extremist and hate group, who is on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s extremism report, a privilege usually reserved for neo-Nazis and terrorists Maybe you should read more about him, before editing his page and removing important information about him. Do you realize the effect that it has on your reputation, to support an extremist, mysoginist, have you even read his hateful works and the interviews for Washtington Times or Daily Dot magazines and what RooshV constantly promotes? Have you read his books and his articles and what Roosh constantly promotes? Do you realize the effect on your reputation to associate yourself with RooshV ? +Here you go, nerdlinger: +Why not read first before assuming I'm doing something wrong. Maybe I did, and maybe I may have made a mistake, but you are jumping yo conclusions here. +" It will take a little time as the recent edit warring has been simply to delete content and sources. Banjeboi " +It has been since changed. I think it may be in the running for a good article. +Well if the editors weren't putting false information, it wouldn't happen. It is you and the others who are vandalising. You clearly know nothing about music. +" === Please stop accusing me of lying or not reading a journal article iss246! == There you go again. Personalizing. Suspeccting. Accusations. My edits are in good faith. I am not a liar. Stop calling me a liar or insinuating such by saying this about me, directly above. Please stop your abuse iss246! ""Mrm7171 claimed to have read the article but never used the quote until I introduced the quote. This makes me suspect what he knows about the Everly article comes strictly from my writing about it."" from iss246..directly above in the previous section. It has been constant. Demeaning. You and your close friend psyc12 that you are both professors, you know best! No-one else knows anything, only you and your close friend outside of Wiki. ....Others, as you keep accusing me for instance, don't read articles etc etc. I am sick of your bad faith accusations! I did read it iss246. I did!~ Stop accusing me of things with suspicion. Act in good faith please. I am sick of your abuse and insinuations!Mrm7171 (talk) " +Chapter Nine In chapter nine Burlington, Vermont Kolbert writes about Burlington, Vermont’s largest city. Years ago the citizens decided to stand up to global warming by using less power instead of buying more. The mayor of Burlington, Peter Clavelle, who has been mayor since 1989, came up with a program that encourages contractors to engage not in demolition but in “deconstruction”. This helps the city save energy by reducing waste and cutting down the need for new materials. Burlington’s electric department (BED) has a wind turbine that provided enough power for thirty homes and gets half of its energy from renewable sources, such as its 50 megawatt power plant that runs off of wood chips. The BED also leases compact florescent light bulbs for twenty cents a month because a family who uses these bulbs can cut their electricity bill by 10 percent. The city of Burlington estimates that their energy saving projects over the course of this lifetime will prevent the release of 175,000 tons of carbon. Burlington residents also eat locally and have turned old waste sites into an assortment of community gardens and cooperatives, the waste from these gardens is taken to a composting factory, and turned back into soil, making this process “closed loop”. Clavelle’s plan has begun to pick up across America beginning with Greg Nickles, the mayor of Seattle, who created a set of principles called the “US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement”. This agreement has been signed by over a hundred and seventy mayors, representing about thirty – six million people. This agreement is trying to prove how much can be done at the local level and Clavelle hopes that more cities will adopt this plan. +" Stop Just stop!! okay? Quit removing championships from the AAA page without reason, you've been told to stop once or twice already - it's vandalism to remove information that's valid. (No Drama) Talk  " +Don't worry Michael; these muslims who call you racist are most likely very radical muslims or jihadists themselves. A woman will be sentenced to death for adultery by stoning, a man gets no such punishment according to Sharia. If a muslim or a left-wing nutjob calls you a racist when you question the motives of Islam (not a race), they are trying to suppress your criticism. +Alison is a DOUCHEBAG. +Amanda: If you want to see controversial, try the articles dealing with the bible! But anyway, the way to go about editing is to begin by creating totally new sections to del with areas of the main subject that so far aren't represented in the article. Adding is far less likely to step on toes than subtracting. Other editors will judge the quality of your work and you'll gain acceptance as one of the team. Then when you've established your credibility, try re-organising existing material - amalgamate material that deals with the same subject but might appear in different sections, shorten paragraphs and improve syntax, and so on - but always trying not to delete more than is essential, and trying also to retain wikilinks. Finally, suggest deletion of any material you think is irrelevant or otherwise doesn't belong - this is where you'll probably find you have to compromise the most. As I said befoer, I have no books and no access to books, and so can't help you with drafting, but I do want to see Leo improved and I'll certainly help with editing. +, in Russia Azerbaijani language is one of the official languages of this country(Despite their small population), but official alphabet of Azerbaijani language in this country is cyrilic, but you can see latin version of Azerbaijani name has been written. +Nick Graves is a lier and a blackmailer. He openly told me that he is a sock puppet of someone. +Needs updating Article needs updating post the credit debacle of 2007. CPDOs have become the poster child of the hidden risks in structured products. +You piece of chickenshit cunt I'm going to have my way with the zero hedge article punk, and if you get in my way I'm going to rape your user page motherfucker. +Template:History of Afghanistan +Italian Hall disaster|Italian Hall disaster a/k/a +Thank you very much for the clarification. If there is anything else I may need, I will let you know. Thanks much. +by the way I hate this font. +AFD I'm cleaning up your AFD nomination for World Communist Movement. Instructions on how to do it can be found at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion. If you're still having trouble, feel free to drop me a line, and I'll see if I can help get you straightened out. - +" I would have to strongly disagree with that. That would set a dangerous precedent for other Soviet designs, i.e. ""Kalashnikov assault rifle"" (AK), ""Kalashnikov machine gun"" (PK), ""Kalashnikov hand-held machine gun"" (RPK) etc. " +"::::::I don't know what back-story you're referring to, Qex. I'm sure you know what ""let alone"" signifies; it's a commonly used phrase. There's a full list of British, Scottish, and English monarchs on this page. As such, if there's going to be a link to a plain list of monarchs, why would it be to List of British monarchs? Its content and more is already here. If the lines are the same back to 1707, why not then link to List of Canadian monarchs? It, at least, doesn't duplicate in its entirety the aforementioned list in this article. Of course, there could be no link in the infobox to any plain list. It seems like a viable option to me. Ħ " +- From someone that you totally wronged with your bullshit and managed to get me to stop contributing very significant contributions to this site nearly a year ago now. (And I contributed a LOT in a short time and would have contributed SO much more had I continued. Things that I did: huge amounts of professional class photography given away for free (placed PD) on subjects (often providing the only pics, to this day, on the subjects in question), hundreds of pages formatted according to standards, huge amounts of latest subject matter information added and facts corrected (in some cases so new that this was the first place on the net to have it) etc. etc.) - and instead of helping me and being civil, sensible and using common sense YOU were more interested in defending a non-contributing user who (for no apparent reason) started a campaign of open violent threats, death threats, spamming and vandalism on me. You were having too much fun abusing your moderator privileges by placing temporary blocks on me, trying to stop me from making my point and trying to give this hugely offensive other user a chance to avoid a police investigation, by mod-vandalizing discussions on the subject etc. - against most other moderators (private) views even - they had the sense not to start a mod war on the subject. Your 500 page nerd-o-pedia rule-book and abusing it to the point of idiocy was more interesting to you. Apparently you felt that since you had read it, everyone else should waste at least as much time and read it too down to every last letter, or you were gonna use it against all common sense toward anyone who didn't - with no regard for the actual situation and reasons behind it, no regard for that individuals contributions, no regard for civility - and most of all, with no common sense applied whatsoever. It's indeed too bad that most pages on nerd-o-pedia are starting to be shockingy un-maintained and obsolete, indeed dead now that the initial rush of contributors is over after a few years, and the fun is over for most people - as, the most brutal blow of all, moderators such as YOU have managed to destroy the morale of even the most serious contributors and have had them leave. They simply did not wish to spend too much time arguing or alternatively face putting up with arrogant admin behavior, because it always will start to take more of your time than contributions here, because of people like YOU, and how wrong the principles are how admins are selected here. It's all about brown-nosing with the crowd and building your giant online virtual ego and lick the ass of other even more OCD nerds who are already admins, and you're just a wannabe. Good ****ing luck trying to get anything edited or updated here in a year or two besides top 10 whatever pop bands may be popular at the time, the latest tv show pages and some other obsessive-compulsive nerdishm. Nobody is foolish enough to put up with the crap that comes along with the job, from people such as YOU. For example, the pages on my subjects were very active till late 2006, and since that they have... well. Remained in the same form as the core contributors left them, as they left this site. No updates. I'm truly not the only one to eject. Not worth the effort to contribute when all you get is shitted all over, if you ever need any help. It's kind of funny that an admin can burn out of this site too, but given your attitude back then, I'm not surprised you did. After all, there were some decent admins here back then (such as ), and I'm sure there's a few now, but WAY too many nerds for whom it is the biggest thing of their lives, and they have to show it, and snoop their noses everywhere. But like I said, as even admins are dropping out, what do you think happened to the contributors? Many pages now are actually full of incorrect shit, because no people of expertise hang around any more to correct details, and newbies or worse, malicious trollers slowly degrade the content that once was at least somehow accurate and relevant. Admins will be happy to see updates to the page, but the fact is, most of the updates today are degenerating the pages, obfuscating subjects and adding factual errors and garbage. And too bad you didn't quit a year ago, I might still be here, and there would probably be several thousands of lines, and few hundred articles more, along with maybe ~1000 more photographs. Good riddance!! +Answer: I can't this. +This website looks interesting http://www.conncoll.edu/academics/departments/relstudies/290/iranian/zoroastrianism/theories.html Zoroastrianism appears to be ancient and it has been suggested that it infuenced the Jews who were in exile in Persia. It also influenced the Greek/Roman world. It looks like Zarathustra could be the 1st known apolalyptic writer. +" Smile its the summer has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding , or to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! " +" Foucault's Lectures At The College de France On Biopower The section ""Foucault's Lectures At The College de France On Biopower"" is very problematic: It presents OR, it fails NPoV, and the style is highly inappropriate on many levels. The sections contains two subsections, the second of which is only a heading. I propose deleting this section completely. " +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! T a l k - Contribs. {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume g +Fran Timbers (1987 London, England) is an English author. She wrote the book Modern Love For Beginners (ISBN (1-4116-7171-6) when she was 15 years old. The book is a self-help guide on how to cope with first love and life as a teenager. The first edition of the book was published in December 2003 by, and has sold out since. A second and third edition have been published. +Riana, I askd you, why don't you take back your actions. You revertd my comments that were not personal attacks, and you expect that you didn't break any rules; whereas, I am expected to leave delusional libel against my edits on my anon's talkpages and get reverted over continually. Ye reverted a talk page so that it keeps tens of screens of absolute drivel, spam, liges, brainwash, disinfo, trash that is openly against the talkpage's description; ye conspird to ban my addresses because I hate how these sick users are allowed to push their disinfo, after I clearly wrote my explanations against in my edit summaries, that the wrong-as-hell teen-without-a-clue was allowed to revert continually without any check or punishment? -lysdexia +Man 1. Get a life 2. Read what I wrote it explains it. 3. chetniks anti-Nazis? Now you shown you´re real face, don´t wright to me anymore I won´t respond and you can call it childish or wtf you want but I don´t want to waste my breath on Nazi sympatitors. I won´t read what you say anymore I´l laf my ass of if it sais I got new messages. NOT Peace +rampant caries and methamphetamine use Can anyone add some explanation to the section that mentions methamphetamine use as a cause of rampant caries? I found that an interesting correlation, but there is nothing to explain the mechanism in the article. Presumably someone familiar with the issue could add a sentence or two to clarify it. Otherwise this is a very good article and the pictures alone might scare some children into brushing their teeth (along the lines of the Simpsons’ “Big Book of British Smiles”). - +Royal just name. User:Cossde / Royal College, Colombo not owner. Restaurants, hair saloons, travel agents, elders homes, shops named Royal with out Royal charter jobless sick wiki fucker. +" Rewrite I think this article violates No personal essays (imho so does ""Intelligent design""). In my opinion most of the stuff can and should be moved to Creation science, History of evolutionary thought, Evolution, Erasmus Darwin, and other places. The current ""definition"" of evolutionism on this page is the same as Evolution. I think a more correct definition and introduction would be something along the lines of ""Evolutionism refers to the belief in the scientific theory of evolution. For the most part, the term is used only by Creation scientists who believe the theory is unsound. Often the phrase is used as a perjorative to draw attention to what some Creationists believe is closed-mindedness amongst scientists...etc"" What do the regular editors think? " +Vest on Rope. =disOFISJLtrltn?? +Ahh heck, why wait? COmments from harrassing Elenseel deleted. +" I'm not keen to get bogged down in a political debate of this kind. And it is political. You can pepper your prose all you like with talk of ""phonological, lexical and gramatical structure"", but this has no bearing on whether Ulster-Scots is a language, because that is purely a political and cultural judgement, not a linguistic one. I'm also not keen on using talk pages to suggest alternate versions of articles. If you want to change the article, feel free to do so. Personally, I can't see what's wrong with it as it stands. 18:30, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)" +" Delete section until complete I have deleted this section pending its completion and will ""park"" it here. Ultrastructure and function Mitochondria Surface glycoproteins Dense tubular system Microtubular system Open canalicular system Plasma membrane Cytoskeleton Alpha granules Dense granules Glycogen granules" +":Washington rarely frequented masonic lodges, he did hear about the ""the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati"" but doubted they had affected american masonic lodges. loc.gov " +" Copyright problem removed Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. " +I understand that I do not own the article, and that I added an invalid external link. However, the other changes made were valid. What do I need to do to in order to edit the page content? +BP v BP/Metrovick Joint Venture Just wondering if there is a need to have two pages with the same. BP was its own company, whislt the Stockton-on-Tees project was a joint venture with MV - suggesting two separate companies there is already a page on the MV/BP joint venture Bowesfield_Works +t think anyone will be concerned that the mentioned user also edits Valve articles. – czar +" You're getting there, but not quite there yet, since the relevant passage only reads: ""The convictions were quashed four years later on the grounds that confessions to police officers had been improperly admitted in evidence."" Since you're quite close to the Strand, why don't you pop round to the Judges Library near the Bear Garden and ask for a day pass for research purposes? Tell them you're contributing to an encyclopedia article and want to get your facts straight....(kiwiexile at DMOZ) • " +Effectiveness of Soap Nuts Hi there, I'm interested in people's experiences using Soap Nuts for laundry... Effectiveness of the different types of Sapindus plants, etc. Toxicity to animals and aquatic life, prevalence of saponin allergy amongst humans. Any takers ? Thx ! +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Heinrich Himmler. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +(Undent) The other wikipedias dont call it a massacre because their sources do not call it a massacre. Arabic sources overwhelmingly do call it a massacre, and thus, the wiki being a product of its sources, the article is called the gaza massacre. This whole time you have been arguing that arabs shouldnt be calling it a massacre, that the facts dont support such a claim. That opinion, whether valid or not, is not what determines the name of an article, it is what the common name in the language for the event that determines the name. You cannot argue that the 2 wikis are discussing the same event, so to then argue that because of the common name for said event is in your mind, and understandably so, non-neutral that we should then censor that undermines core principles of the wikis. Yes the wiki should server to convey facts and hopefully transfer knowledge, but what we think are facts are almost always perceptions of facts. It boggles my mind that something that should be as trivial as asking what is the common term associated with an event in a given language needs to be so difficult. If arabs are calling this event the gaza massacre, then surprise! the name of the article will be the gaza massacre. +" Could there be another sub-section called ""International and comestic Reactions""? I think it is pertinent to the article at this stage. The Global Times (a Chinese daily apparently suffused with a glaring nationalistic view) article further said that while India's path for boosting its military strength has not met too many obstacles, the country is still poor (as if China is not) and lags behind in infrastructure construction (of course it does). In Delhi, diplomatic sources in the Chinese embassy said, As a side note, India needs to take more consideration of external threats. And it seems naive to think that India can continue to develop as a global economic power without also bringing its defence capabilities up to the standards of other nations in the region. From our POV it seems poverty should be their priority, but the UK, US etc all have poverty and still spend billions on effective defence measures. Reference User:Mrt3366 " +(UTC) It's Britain, not Briton, but I would not expect a fan to be literate.88.110.112.185 14:46, 27 April 2012 +Liverpool FC There has been an increasing alarm of bald men coming about, people think this is stress related but others think that it is just Bold textJimon Timon disease.Bold text This disease is spreading at an alarming rate so please lock up your husbands who are 40 and older becasue they could be at serious risk of catching this terrible disease. All people under the age of 30 are fine except Dan Timon who the disease has already reached so please stay away, he has also got Crabs and Gonnorrehea in his groin. +"A username by itself is not proof of identity. However, in this case, there's a known pattern and consistencies across multiple platforms. His edits have absolutely nothing to do with ensuring accuracy; rather the need to ""Bring Aggy down"". THIS is the actual person http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_13651540 " +Seems like the original version is innuendo or a borderline case; the reader is being led to infer that the police chief lied, even though the source does not state this. (talk) (contribs) +" On the set-theory bit (""Zermelo's axioms ... evolved into the now-canonical ZFC set theory"") that begs the question. The fact it says so in Wikipedia does not guarantee its truth! Let me see if I can dig up the relevant sources. Also worth adding that the controversy is an old one: the Zermeloists successfully argued that the theory was 'natural'. But there was no evolution. There was considerable resistance to the theory at the beginning, universally accepted thought it is now. " +" Jivesh, he is comparing respective singles released this year and both singers last albums. There is nothing bias about it. • Watch n' Learn " +I need some help with the DLA Piper page - the one Flags section is a big advert but another editor thinks it should stay and keeps undoing it. +advice on Dan I think that right now rap music is very popular in Europe (they are usually about five years behind the U.S.) si if you write a rap song for him it may very well win him over. I'm quite sure it could not hurt. This I Order For The Common Good +With the list currently being so short I would leave it without restrictions at this point. I would definitely include leagues lower than the AHL in a number of cases such as junior or ECHL or any of the euro leagues. - +Hope you have an internship bery good for first yob! +onorem is still a faeggot +FREE MYANMAR!!! STOP THE MILITARY REGIME!!!! PATS1 DOESN't CARE!!! HE ONLY CARES ABOUT FOOTBALL AND ORDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Iraniyar is 12th century AD , unncessarily he has been quoted as 8th century AD to advance date. Iraniar quoted three sangam dates. The last being 10th century AD. so he cannot be before 10th century,he is generally accepted as 12th century, why put him as 8th century +"""The Samsung Papyrus is a portable e-book reader."" it gave many information to me. so I can buy this device as eye-closed D." +The new edidt is fair derek101 +" There's only about 200 links - some redirects have had several thousand links. Also, the redirect to BJAODN doesn't necessarily build an encyclopedia (it's just a list of humorous things), so another reason to remove it would be WP:IAR. Talk " +"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Intuitive guide to Wikipedia You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! My talk " +" Hello, , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility" +" ""Years after Hanson's death, will her biographer sit down and include this incident and her reaction? I've written articles on Australian historical figures—from the left and the right—and I don't include petty bullshit like this."" Further point is that it is irrelevant to her entire life and career. So many Wikipedia articles aren't a proper biography, they're ""slap"" from this media article, and ""slap"" from that media article; based on the idea that it was said, or done, so it must be there (irrelevant of how petty or non-notable it is). It's why articles on modern-day 'extremists', whatever their creed, are so bad: because they're just conduits for media crap. (i.e. Something negative was said about the person at hand, so it therefore must be slapped in the article; this is done under the guise of it being ""notable"", but it is, in reality, just an editor taking an oppourtunity to attack the person at hand.) Do not think I'm blind. I see through the bullshit, whether it comes from you or the media. I haven't moved away from my earlier points because I'm sticking to my guns; I'm merely elaborating on them further in the hope to getting the point across to you and your comrades. Nice try at baiting me, though. talk " +Sequoyah and Sequoia Some disputes seem to be present among botanists about whether Sequoyah was source for name of Sequoia tree. Apparently even as eminent an authority as Asa Gray has questioned the link, and the namer of Sequoia (Endlicher, 1847), left no notes to explain his choice of name. Web link may not persist, but is here: http://www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/conifers/cu/se/index.htm. This web article makes formal citation here: Hartesveldt, Richard J.; Harvey, H. Thomas; Shelhammer, Howard S.; Stecker, Ronald E. 1975. The giant sequoia of the Sierra Nevada. Washington DC: National Park Service. An engaging but professional (if a bit dated) treatment of the largest conifer. +/| /| | Hello, I am Gay | ||__|| | Welcome to the | / O O\__ site of | / \ Gilliam! | / \ \ I Murder Puppies | / _ \ \ / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | __|| / / \ |____| || / | | /| | | | | |// |____ | * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ * _\ _ \ // | / _ \\ _ // | / * / \_ /- | - | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ +" Yes, just add the import line at Special:Mypage/skin.js. — T/C " +Comment on his divorce, and the reason for it comes from his daughter, who was a classmate of mine when she atteneded Purdue University school of Electrical Engineering. I will not mention her name so as to protect her privacy. +But then I rarely get my evil way with anything these days, must be getting old or lazy. Or perhaps both. +Addendum: I just wanted to add how hysterical I think the last bit of edit warring has been given the parties that are involved! Bwahahahaha...ha. +Why is County Derry mentioned in the infobox? Before it was called County Londonderry, it was County Coleraine so where did County Derry come from? +Tony Cragg I am writing to you re Tony Cragg's article on Wikipedia, which I have been trying to improve. As you quite rightly pointed out, (prior to my editing) Wikipedia's coverage of Cragg's life and career is embarrassingly weak and what I have added is not 'necessarily bad.' I am new to Wikipedia editing and it has been difficult to get to grips with how it works, but I feel like I am getting there. For all my efforts to be deleted would be a real shame. I would like to start up a dialogue so I can continue to improve Cragg's article. As I understand it, you have identified the section on the Sculpture Park as posing a potential copyright issue, as a copy or modification of the text from Cragg's website. I did indeed use his website as a point of reference (for lack of other sources) but I am surprised you consider what I edited to be a copyright issue. I will happily work on this section further so as to improve it but I ask that you 'unblock' the rest of article and advise the best way to proceed. I look forward to hearing from you Hi! It is quite amazing to me that someone so well known could have such a poor article here, but that can happen; it will be blanked for a week or so now so that anybody who wants to rewrite it can do so. I do understand that it's very hard to get started as an editor here, and certainly I don't want to make it harder for you. However, you may inadvertently have fallen foul of some of our basic rules, including the one about using several accounts (that isn't in itself a problem, but becomes one if the accounts break other rules, such as, unfortunately, our copyright policy). One of the four accounts has declared a connection to the Lisson Gallery, and the IP address obviously belongs to the gallery; it would be helpful to know if the other three editors who appear to be similarly connected, including you, are so connected, or indeed are all the same real-world person. If you have a connection to the gallery you probably have what we call a conflict of interest, and that means that in most cases you shouldn't edit the article, but limit yourself to suggestions on the talk page. I'm prepared to help with the writing in this case. A good first step would be to start assembling some independent reliable sources about the artist. These should be sources of information that do not have an interest in promoting him, so commercial art gallery websites are unlikely to be acceptable, but websites of public institutions, books, well-known newspapers and magazines are all likely to be good. You could perhaps list some of those on the talk page of the article. While it's helpful if I can see them, it's not obligatory. Then we can take it from there. +" It's now clear I recently misinterpreted something I read as suggesting Cho Sun In Min Bo was an occupation newspaper of the south. Good sources identify it as a northern paper that predated the war. Hence, we can return to the original identification of the journalists as NKs and smooth out the first sentence as GAB suggests. , , , , , I hope you can rejoin so we can get this done via consensus. This is a relatively simple section, as are the next couple. Thanks. " +Well, I should have used commentary instead of conjecture. My evidence is nothing less than maimonides. It is a pretty widespread theological understanding of the lineages of different people. Out of my head, +" Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe (commonly abbreviated MK vs DC) is an upcoming scheduled crossover fighting game from Midway Games in the Mortal Kombat series, which will contain characters from both the Mortal Kombat franchise and the DC Comics Universe. The game's story will be written by comic writers Jimmy Palmiotti and Justin Gray. This will be the first game in the franchise that will not bear the ""M"" Rating as confirmed by the producer Ed Boon in a video interview.Video interview with Ed Boon, Game Trailers Epic Games reports that the game is being developed using their Unreal Engine 3 and the release has been announced for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 platforms.Unreal Technology A specific release date has not yet been revealed, but a playable game demo is expected to be available in E3 2008 between July 15 and July 17. Roster According to interviews, the characters are being chosen mainly looking for parallels between the characters from both universes. For one, Sub-Zero seems to have been chosen as Batman's face-off, according to the game art and trailer.Video interviw with Ed Boon, Gamespot Ed Boon has said that some of the characters' abilities, especially on the DC side, have been toned down to make them balanced within the game. A case of this Ed Boon mentioned, is Superman no longer as invulnerable as he usually is, for example he may now be hurt by Scorpion's spear.Interview with Ed Boon, TRMK.org Sonya Blade and Flash were the next pair of characters officially confirmed for the game,The Flash and Sonya confirmed in MK vs. DCU with Shang Tsung and Catwoman being confirmed in the first MKast (a podcast detailing the production of the game).http://worldscollide.com/podcasts/MKast_Ep01.mp3 Liu Kang and Captain Marvel were the next two characters confirmed on Mkast #2.http://worldscollide.com/podcasts/MKast_Ep02.mp3 In a recent interview with Ed Boon, he confirmed that two characters will be revealed at this year's E3 conference and four other characters will be revealed at this years Comic Con.GameTrailers TV episode Confirmed characters Characters are listed in alphabetical order. Mortal Kombat characters ! align=""center"" width=250 |DC Comics charactersLiu KangBatmanScorpionCaptain MarvelShang TsungCatwoman Sonya BladeFlashSub-ZeroSuperman Gameplay A released promotional video for the game shows Batman fighting Sub-Zero and portrays new gameplay modes.Promotional trailer It has been announced that the game will feature a story mode, playable from two different perspectives, one from the DC side, and one from the Mortal Kombat side, and depending on which side players choose, they will see +Constant vandalism by Crusio to this page must stop. +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:MySpace, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +KIMEP University The Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research (KIMEP) has officially changed its name to KIMEP University. Change in KIMEP's Status. This needs to be reflected in the article about the university. +I started to write something in the original request, but realized that a separate appeal would be more easily understood by editors who had not participated in the original discussion. Thank you for your support. +Hey ,muslim dickhead !!!!!!!! Why don;t you go and shove Allah or whatever the fuck you call the retard up your stupid backwards ass !!!!!!!!! You fucking muslims are a bunch of jealous west hating mongs, Islam is a peaceful religion, BULLSHIT !!!!!!! There are many times when it refers to violence. So go strap on your suicide bomb and blow yourself up. yey, one less feeble minded prick ion the world. +Please provide your summary of the above news articles. Can you? Baburam Bhattarai did have a criminal history (justified or unjustified) and you are just not allowing anyone to post anything that talks about his criminal past. It can be historically seen from all your edits in that article that you have edited everything that shed light on his 'underground' days. Need a help Hi everyone, I would love if anyone can write a brief summary - in 1 or 2 sentence - regarding the historical background of Baburam Bhattarai that can be put up on his wikipedia page. We need to write based on these articles: - http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-19519379_ITM - http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2010/01/01/top-stories/Parties-vow-to-end-trust-deficit/3609/ - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3246066.stm +" ILLUMINATI!!! Finally got cha! Well your suggestion looks really enticing *scuttles back to the Madonna talkpage* (talk2me) " +" Making a new sockpuppet account does not count as ""going away"", by the way. Lots of people were trying to help and you just insist on making up these strange lies. 22:57, August 5, 2005 (UTC)" +" Of course I can't speak for the editor who placed the tags, but I've been watching this article for some time. I've noticed (and have been meaning to edit, but haven't gotten around to it) that the current version of the page has a tendency to say ""critics say"" in a somewhat weasel-wordy way that could be addressed by placing a citation closer to the critics-say sentence, and I think this is what you have now been starting to do. I think that many of the new tags can be deleted, personally. I also have noticed that the page is written in a way that is just criticisms, without at least a brief acknowledgment of the opposing view for NPOV, and without acknowledging that many criticisms apply to only some adherents of religion (for example, not all believers condone blood sacrifice, to name an obvious example that recently attracted attention). I would imagine that some editors, understandably, could be reacting to that as well. " +REDIRECT Talk:U.S. Post Office–Yuma Main +I would appretiate if you are to stop bringing me up in your comment on AN/I. That I am banned while Vexorg is not proves absolutely nothing. Who are the judges? The only things (with some rare exceptions) that Vexorg was doing lately, is adding nonsense to the articles and being reverted over, and over, and over again: one article only for example. Of course the user is also reporting me to all administrators talk pages over and over and over again: ;; ; and so on, and so on. Do you really believe that CordeliaNaismith, Stellarkid, me, Plot Spoiler;Off2riorob and many others ate all wrong about Vexorg, and you are right? As much I am concerned this edit alone should have made the user topic banned at everything that concerns Jews. I am sorry, but the only thing that stinks to me are your comments on AN/I. I am not interested in continuing communications with you. Thanks. +" The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar For offering a helping hand with archiving. 3:16 " +Are you aware that this is not a music magazine? Do you know the meaning of the term encyclopedic? Do you know the difference between idiomatic expressions, slang and encyclopedic (formal) language? Music genres Try to bann me, I'm waiting. +Yes but i do not want to be rash in my choice of words conisdering that said blurting out of whatever unacceptable gibberlish i think of lead to this block in the first place and will only negativly affect me. ( ) +Blow me You can fuck off. Warn all you want douche lol 24.153.216.129 +High Efficiency Rifle +"(Some days later:) I've WP:BOLDLY put back a much shorter version of the argument from ""pseudo-kerning"", citing Dr Newcomer as the source. Here's a copy: Inter-character spacing Joseph Newcomer, an expert cited by critics of the memos, claims that the memos display a simple alternative to kerning characteristic of TrueType fonts but not available on any office equipment in 1972. For example, in words containing ""fr"", TrueType moves the ""r"" left to tuck it in under the top part of the ""f"".{{cite web | title=The Bush ""Guard memos"" are forgeries! | url=http://www.flounder.com/bush2.htm | author=Joseph Newcomer | date=2004-09-15 | accessdate=2007-01-29 }} Please note that my version uses Newcomer as a primary source, and so plainly is quite acceptable per WP:RS and WP:V#SELF. Cheers, (talk) " +i wantz to contribute to wikipedia and bes a sciencist editor. i be posting al the science stuff and sht. +" {| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%""| Welcome! Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, ask me on my talk page, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. And remember, no question is ""stupid""; if you have anything, absolutely anything that you'd like to know, feel free to drop on by and leave me a message! D Happy Editing! {| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! Getting Help |- |style=""color:#000""| My Talk Page New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions |- ! Getting along |- |style=""color:#000""| Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians [[Wikipedia:Con +" IRWolfie's question Kozima wrote, ""The products of cold fusion phenomenon (CFP) observed by Miley et al. [Miley and Patterson 1996] are tabulated in Table C6.1"". That table lists the kinds of atoms that Miley and Patterson reported finding in microspheres that had been used in a Patterson Power Cell. At the top of Kozima's page 148 he uses the abbreviation TNCF and he defines that term on page page 192 as ""trapped neutron catalyzed fusion"". Using TNCF to refer to the transmutation of nickel into copper seems appropriate because the nickel is being transmuted into a heavier element (copper) and that is an example of nuclear fusion. However, using TNCF to refer to the transmutation of nickel into lighter elements is a bit misleading because such transmutations are actually examples of nuclear fission, not fusion. In contrast, Miley has used the term ""fissfus"" to describe the transmutation of nickel into a heavier element (copper) and lighter elements (chromium, manganese, iron, and cobalt). The term ""fissfus"" is derived by combining the ""fiss"" from fission with the ""fus"" from fusion. " +Bunch of Fucking retards You Guys are all a bunch of stupid pathetic fucking retards! Barek ‎Dwpaul ‎AnomieBOT ‎Materialscientist ‎Jytdog Corkythehornetfan ALL OF YOU! It obvious you all hate TODAY Show that why you are not willing to play fair. +, I replied in the Talk page. First I sent the message without signature, then I sent with signature. Regards. +I know this paragraph needs work and references but I felt it was important to introduce these points and the refinement could happen later. +Okay, I got it. Thanks. +", 4 February 2008 (UTC) I think the map is a decent enough feature - it's certainly useful for anyone who doesn't want to wade through the data to see what the overall picture is! However, I agree with the poster above that the ""last poll"" methodology is somewhat crude - it makes the map too volatile and is open to too much interpretation (if two polls come out on the same day, which is the last one?) I think a rolling average would be too difficult to keep up to date and too prone to errors - so what I'd suggest is the following: Each poll is scored as Obama, Clinton or Tie (if the lead is less than the margin of error). Then every time a new poll is added, the person adding it does a simple count of the number of ""wins"" each candidate has in the last three days' polls. If either candidate has a majority, they are awarded the state. If not, it's scored as a tie. If there are no objections, I am happy to go through and do this for the existing data. 20:06" +Looks pretty good now. The only issue might be that it would be nice to have references to the history section. I see no particular reason to distrust it, as such, so I don't feel that it will make or break the article. Good job. +Guinnog, the POV pushing that folks like Morton deal with leaves little room at times for compromise. Their ongoing attempts to misuse Wikipedia as an advocacy platform for their conspiracy theories is something that doesn't have to be condoned at any time. Morton has made some alterations to his userpage that is in keeping with with the current policy, maybe a couple other areas could use some reduction in opinion. If this is the only userpage that details an editors major emphasis to the project, that would be news to me. If Morton wishes to demostrate on his userpage the articles he is glad to see deleted or the ones he thinks shjould be, there is no reason he can't. There is also no reaosn he can't provide, as a disclaimer, his major emphasis on this project to keep 9/11 conspiracy theory rhetoric minimized in accordance with the undue weight clause of NPOV. I support Morton's efforts to keep this nonsense on Wikipedia in it's proper place. +Reply Good day to you, sir. It seems a shame that you have taken this attitude, after all, I did welcome you nicely in the hope that you might want to contribute constructively to this encyclopedia. Wikipedia isn't a spoof website, it's an encyclopedia, so articles that you think are amusing are not nessesarily seen as funny by others. It wasn't actually me that deleted it, I merely flagged it up as being non-encyclopedic and another editor thought the same. Westenders is a nice idea for a parody soap opera, and that sort of thing might be seen as quite comical on a website such as Uncyclopedia, which is as spoof encyclopedia, thus if you want to write less serious entries that may be the place to go. However, if you do wish to contribute seriously, please don't let this setback stop you - perhaps our paths will cross again in a positive context. P.S. What happened in 1952? +If Ronnie becomes elected as Student Senator, would this qualify him after that? +" Trivia lesson Ok, I’m going to enjoy this… Here we go, amateur. You can reply where I indicated between paregraph so that the disscusion can be more organized: 1. Rupert Thorne was a recurring villain in a Kingpin fashion from the 2nd half of the 70's until the Crisis came. Then he was forgotten and then saved by Timm in the 90's for the animated series. Falcone is just a recurring name Frank Miller and Jeph Loeb use when he needs to mention Gotham City mafia. Carmine, was never a lead villain like Rupert has been. If you accuse me of just watching the animated series (which I deny) I can acuse you of just getting exited because of the Carmine appearance in the last movie. Maroni is just a support guy for Two-Face's story, as Tony Zucco is for Robin's (who is the nerd defending minor characters and bragging about how he knows nick names everybody knows, like ""Boss"" and ""roman"" , now? heh, heh, heh) Reply: 2. every single comment can be sourced. Appealing to whom, for example is the easiest comment to source if you want to waste your time like that. Just check how many batman titles are published every single month and how many people buys against any other superhero's books. You will learn that monthly, the amount of baman books sold is good enough to call the mythos appealing. That's why there are 6 motion pictures, 2 animated series (without jl and superfriends and even scooby-doo appearances by joker, riddler, scarecrow and penguin) and, live action show and several internet about batman, his foes and his mythos. That's why the mythos is so appealing. Reply: 3. Catwoman is dangerous. Following your logic maybe mr zsasz would be batman's worst enemy. Being a killer doesn’t make an enemy notable as his protagonism and his importance in the mind of Batman and Batman readers, writers and creators does. Knowing Batman's identity and not being completely on the good side makes her even more important. You seem new to the comics’ world, do you really think Catwoman is going to be Holly for so long? Context, PC, context. Selina has been a main character for more than 60 years, I’m talking about all those years. Not about the comic book you just bought on the corner store last week, my ""mate"". Following again your line of thought, it not worth saying Nixon was a president because he is dead. We couldn’t say Adam West was Batman because that show is of. And you called my ways childish… Reply: 4. I think you might be confused. We are talking about Batman. You might be thinking of some other superhero. In batman comics bets are that, if you buy a batman comic from any year at random, or watch any episode form any batman series, also at random, The Joker, Catwoman, the Penguin, the Riddler or Two-face are going to be the main villain. If you get the croc, or scar-face, the mad-hatter you are loki, and if you catch you hero the ""Roman"" you are really, really a lottery winner. By the way there it’s something called figurative speech, and it means to compare situations, I dunno if they told you. They are not literary on a race. Reply: 5. Hugo, the Scarecrow and the Hatter are influential because, whenever they appear, the story goes on a deeper lever exploring Batman's mind and messing with it. Those characters are useful tools when a writer wants to analyze Batman. Besides, I don't know if you are capable of using your imagination, I’m sure you can, it’s an indispensable tool for getting into the story when you read, but if someone messes with your mind on the level they have messed with Batman’s , that'll probably leave some ugly emotional scars on you... good thing he is the Batman. Therefore, they do get to be influential in a way. Thinking they don't get to appear as much as the five previous, therefore they are not influential is just wrong Reply: 6. I put the first Clayface after mentioning that the previous are important. Don't make me doubt of your reading skills. How ever Basil Karlo has been important on and off and he started the Clayface concept and we have to point that. You talked about context to me, marking the appearance of the 1st Clayface, as I did, is context. Reply: 7. I could doubt words I used like hot, sexy, bimbo and many other, that I once and again asked everyone to edit if they don't happen to like them. But I think is safe to say their creators intentions were to make those female characters look like that. Didn't you notice the curves in the drawings? I dunno about you but for most guys that could be a hot bimbo. In both comics and series Harley has been portrayed as a slut, sleeping with her teachers for a better note, killing his lover without caring and even was hinted as a playful lesbian in Hush. If you add that to the fact t +HEY BUTTFACE YOUR A STUPID LIKE TIMBERLY ELIZABETH BUTTFACE YOU BUTTACE +" Thanks for clearing up the Absolute Justice thing, but I still think that AM's contract status should be changed. As can be seen at: http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2010/05/19/allison-mack-smallville/ , she said several and the source you have listed has changed it to seven. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.11.177.12 " +Agreed. Let's just keep the name as it is. +REDIRECT Talk:Make-Up (1937 film) +" User warnings While archiving a talk page is permissible, it is misleading and deceitful to remove indications that warning tags have been removed by not displaying any reference to your archives. Given that your warning is less than a week old, this is especially important. Be patient. On a side note, you may be interested in the ongoing discussion concerning this at Wikipedia:Removing warnings. E@ If you dare touch this page....." +" @jps: You could email me or Dr.K. and get our guaranteed-perfect opinions. However, you must know that any hint of probing personal information regarding an editor is strictly prohibited, so if the essence of a message would be ""X posted that Y has a COI because in real life ..."" we can skip the email because that is absolutely prohibited and, if repeated, will correctly lead to an indefinite block until there is a plausible undertaking to never use that path. I fully support the WP:OUTING policy, although I agree that it leads to very unfortunate problems when a COI arises (I'm speculating about the COI—I saw nothing of the discussion leading to this). Wikipedia has problems—that is known—but nibbling out OUTING will not benefit the community. " +Hello I make the internet suck Ok bitch face and you are going to die oneday even if it's of natral old age +" March 2008 (UTC) Support after consideration - I'm persuaded by the other party's rationale. Clearly, the current title is confusing and doesn't cover Chinese distilled liquors. ""Japanese wine"" at Wiki refers to only wines made from grapes, and ""Chinese alcoholic beverages"" seems fair for the title. For consistency, I think Korean wine should be also moved to ""Korean alcoholic beverages"". 04:27, 30" +for various reasons I suppose. If you have a particular removal in mind, please post the diff. Mostly I think links are removed because they are judged to be fringy and/or extremist. (ᛏ) +" How? You're blocked, and if you like, this can become permanent. Meanwhile, either ask to be unblocked or serve your block. Further abuse of this Talk page will result in your access being removed for the duration of the block. andemu " +" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brokenmiles for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " +Controversies Among Italians Shouldn't something be added about the fact that most Italians see Pizza Hut as a disgrace to Italian food? +"Although I found at least one reference that says ""Breck"", the Brigham and Women's own website disagrees with you. In general, when you make significant changes to established articles, please provide a reference. . . Jim - (talk • contribs) " +" Updated maps for ""Gender differences in suicide Hello! I am working on updating the Wikipedia page ""Gender differences in suicide"". I think the maps that you've included provide some good data for the article, however they are a little out of date. I went to the website linked through the pictures (radicalcartography), and saw that you'd made some new maps using more recent data. Would it be possible for you to upload the new pictures so that the article accurately reflects current trends? I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I'm unsure how/if I can do this myself. Thanks for any help you can provide! " +, 19 March 2008 (UTC) You are making threats of blocking my ability to edit pages, and you keep doing so on my talk page. I would appreciate it if you would stop threatening me. I do not appreciate being threatened by people, and MJroots made a similar threat to me, so i told him the same thing i told you, i do not appreciate being threatened at all. I am new to editing in wikipedia so i dont know all of the ins and outs, so back off of my talk page and stop threatening me. Thank you. 11:35 +FA checklist Why so many citations in the lead? Where footnotes are at the end of a sentence, please ensure that the closing period appears before the footnotes and is not omitted Ensure that all foreign-language sources are identified as such, and that English sources are not misidentified as foreign-language (as in FN 112) FN 22: publisher? Be consistent in whether web sources are cited using base URLs, website names or publishers Be consistent in whether you provide locations for newspapers Publication names should be italicized Check formatting of quotes within quotes FN 72: formatting Bloomberg or Bloomberg L.P. Check for minor formatting inconsistencies like doubled periods In general, make sure formatting is consistent - for example, compare FNs 101 and 102 FN 103: retrieval date? Make typographical changes to source titles to comply with our local manual of style - for example, don't write a title in all-caps Be consistent in whether authors are listed first or last name first check for consistent naming - for example, The Wallstreet Journal or The Wall Street Journal? +Strong disagree. SoftSecurity is more effective than HardSecurity. People prefer delineating a path by placing rocks as guide posts than having the path roped off. Keep off the grass signs are often objects of vandalism and uncontained anger. Soft Security > Hard Security Keep our Wikipedia open. +Yo Mamma? Maybe this is just amateurism, but there appears to be the words 'yo mamma' where the word 'moon' should be in the first paragraph. I would have fixed it, but the actual page seems to show no problem. +Motherfucker look at what u have done to the references. The codes are all messy. Dont teach me about copyright laws. Copyright materials are always copyright materials everywhere. U useless OCD psycho, u dont have anything better to do, do u? I told u to take a look at the page of IIT Bombay, fucker. Cant find any violation of policies there, huh? The page of Cornell University still uses Flag icons. What a shame u r? U r only good as talking. U r useless. U got a lot to learn too. +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Notability of City journalist directory A tag has been placed on City journalist directory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +In short, if no complaint was lodged against me in an official location, your watching my talk page is stalking and not becoming of an admin. +I've got a comment about getting this done to my pubes +" Big Bad Voodoo Daddy May I suggest some things? First of all, after taking time to work on each album's Wikipedia article, I realized that there was a trampoline without a jumper or anywhere to jump to. Basically, we bought a concrete trampoline and our children will never forgive us... Anyways, I think that it would be best to either consolidate the articles into a discography page (or maybe just add a discography page as well; they have eight albums), or add to them. If you have ideas, please reply at my talk page. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a concrete trampoline to throw out. ''' (Blastoff!)''' " +REDIRECT Talk:Sandy Collins (politician) +HAHAHA you're never gonna find my IP address. Lorna's cuddly and girls in the latency phase are SO cute +" Whoever keeps deleting this with no comment to me is being unethical and a literal fascist (I mean literally at this point) ( minutes after posting this it was erased) check it out. this is very suspicious and unethical by the parties involved. senior management (if in existence) asked to investigate) ````Please do not block me for trying to improve the integrity of the article. Hello, My name is JohnHistory. I was recently blocked for my mentioning of major problems here because I did not assume ""Good Faith"" when confronted with bad faith. I believe that the biggest problem with this article and thus the best way to improve it is to intensely follow the Jimbo guidelines to the T. I am going to post what I wrote on my talk page after being blocked during the controversy here. I could be more covert in my contempt for violations especially given my long but yet humble ranking amongst the Wiki Elite but abusing editors and monitors must be accountable or we will always suffer from their petty tyranny. This surely does not make me popular amongst them, yet I must assume ""good faith"" in them so that they will not prejudice their views against me and comfort their own politics in the process. I was accused of supporting things I never did. All I ask is that criticism be included on par with other presidents. That is all. I don't especially care about Rev Wright, etc but if it is historical record and part of historically long campaign then I will stick my neck out for it. I have to say that the amount of bashing of media and talk that has nothing to do with improving the article is highly tolerated if it is left leaning but anything even center of that is treated with heavy hand and often banished and erased. that is what struck me about the discussion page - mind you I never made an edit on the actual article I was banned for merely talking on a talk page. it was the idea that these so called monitors are in fact just random non scholars at home abusing the tools of wikipedia to further their almost personal agenda in a group- think environment. Thin skin is no excuse for being literally fascistic in your approach to the open to the public - controlled by a small group of ideologues - Wikipedia. These political minding ideologues are 80-100% dominated by left wing or leaning people and controlled through even the excessive use of blocking for discussion posts and factual additions. These (not just mine) are non threatening non- offensive language - just the idea of one stating that their is a problem with the editors and monitors is cause to be blocked and potentially banned for not ""assuming good faith"" or ""positively contributing to the consensus"". what if the consensus is wrong then? What if about if you have already assumed Good Faith long ago and are simply diagnosing the major illness of the article as you see it? The evidence is more then abundant that these monitors are violating their tools and are involved in subterfuge or at least strong bias as evidenced between comparing Obama with W Bush. Additionally, the Obama Administration through proxies, in my strong opinion, is at work in the Obama article. I say this mainly because it is inconceivable to me that given the current administrations use and celebration of all things internet and aggressive pursuit of media outlets and shaping the publics opinion (as is understandable) that someone out of the thousands of Obama connected likely people is not involved on the Barack Obama page. It is the most visited page on Wikipedia and is one of the top hits for people searching the internet for the name Barack Obama. However, that is secondary to the already abundant supply of ideologue editors and monitors who seem to fill the demographic of the wikipedia junior officer ranks who enough of is all that it really takes. The number of those is in the millions. That is Why Jimbo guidelines must be followed as an example of the integrity of wikipedia as a REAL encyclopedia that could stand out in a scholarly work. The language given the Rulers of Wikipedia gives them broad ability to block and ban anyone they disagree with. OFten the language is contradictory. For instance I was blocked for my comments on the TALK page and cited for ""Making a point instead of wanting to edit"". How, exactly, do you make a TALK page based discussion about edits without making a point? Another monitor told me I had to assume good faith, yet no good faith was given to me in my quest to improve article. In addition, the ""TALK"" page says no writing will be allowed that involves ""general discussion"" however that can be loosely interpreted and it could for instance only be 5% of what you wrote and then be grounds by a prejudiced monitor to remove your entire sections containing many posts. Additionally, the last guideline about general talk is only applied to people making comments critical or pot +Dicdef? It doesn't seem to me to be a dicdef. Its not on multiple distinct definitions of the title it's a stub which has possibility of expansion in encyclopedic ways; it's not a dicdef just because it's currently short plenty of other articles contain little more than a definition and some small amount of discussion, if the same standard for 'dicdef' then a large number of articles would disappear. I don't think that's what 'dicdef' means to most people. - () Wolfkeeper (Talk) +Which form of the Lab color space is used by Photoshop? I can select several color modes in Photoshop, RGB, CMYK, Lab, etc. Is the Lab color mode in Photoshop actually Lab (Hunter Lab), or is it really L*a*b* (CIE Lab)? +Dear David Ruben Try SourceWatch for a start . . .in addition to MSN.com ( Search Term: General Medical Council )...Then go back to the Wikipedia Article on the General Medical Council and appropriately list Abolish the General Medical Council (GMC) as one of the GMC's Notable Critics. I have done it for you !!! So please thank me for it !!! Thank you - UKDoctor +Can anyone help confirm, or dispute that Philadelphia was the capital before the Revolutionary War? And thank You Gadget850 +Copyvios It looks like we have at least one summary copied from another site. - (contribs) +Mokele what is the largest black caiman you have heard of? Huh? +" Often mislabed Somebody should add that it's often mislabed as ""Love, Reign Over Me"" and ""Reign On Me""." +"Proposed edits== Never edited an article before, so thought i'd put these ideas and bits of information here first for people to comment on before messing about with stuff and making a mess of things. Firstly, the FGD for Units 3 and 4 is now complete and operational. Also there are now plans for a multi fuel CHP plant on the site. http://www.sse.com/Ferrybridge/TheMultiFuelProject/ And a carbon capture pilot scheme is currently under construction, which will capture 1% of the flue gas from Unit 4 (equivalant to 5MW). http://www.sse.com/Ferrybridge/TheCCSProject/ The figure of 218 million litres of CW an hour doesn't really mean anything to me... it's quite a difficult thing to imagine... maybe stating something along the lines that this equates to the 4 CW pumps delivering roughly 60 tonnes of CW every second... or enough to fill an olympic sized swimming pool in under a minute, might help people visualise just how much 218 million litres an hour is. There is a note stating ""Not to be confused with Eggborough Power Station or Drax Power Station"" at the beginning of the article, which is fair enough as they all sit in a line within about 15 miles of each other and are easily confused, but there's no similar note on either the Eggborough or Drax articles. Seems sensible that this warning should be included on all 3 articles or none at all, rather than just one. ==" +the rewrite is in. Used a lot of the same content, but just wikified, restructured, neutralized, etc. Hope people like this version more. Happy writing. +"For the record, anon 96.18.39.97 never made a comment on my talk page about why he ""did the edit"". That's quite obvious in the edit histories. Methinks he doth protest too much. " +" WikiProject Star Wars invitation I have noticed that you are listed as a member of the Star Wars WikiProject, which has been defunct for a long time. I would like to inform you that I am attempting to revitalize it. As such, I would officially like to invite you to participate in the project once again. If you are interested, please sign your name at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Star Wars#February 2009 Roll Call. Hope to see you soon! Talk " +via a mother or father..eg: Jade Jagger.... +technically wednesday will be three months, but yeah, haha, cool, CX <3 +unsubstantiated accusations which you have declined to justify when asked to, +Thank you, the article did need more neutral sources. New reliable, significant and independent sources have been added to this article from third party sources that establish Crouch's role as notable by Wikipedia standards. Crouch is listed as DCEO of HLE on a new source in the Wikipedia article from the Florida Dept. of State/Corporations Division. The United Nations has officially recognized the contributions of Smile of a Child foundation as notable (source in the article from the UN website), and Smile of a Child TV is a national network, and the only one of it's kind.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smile_of_a_Child_TV. Additionally, Jan Crouch is a widely recognized TV personality which is documented in numerous third party publications (pro or con). Her professional, and broadcasting career is separate and uniquely different than that of Paul Crouch.71.97.55.109 +Please choke on a bucket of dicks. Thank you. +with independent and credible +" As I mentioned it to you before, you have to read all those posts more carefully. The thing you say here are the same ones that you sayed then, and had no worth, as you were mistaking by not having read the provided data thoroughly. You need to do that now in order to see what you failed to se then. It is very clear in fact, I saw it the first time I read it, but it can be that you had a ""proove-me-right"" set of glasses then. Now you have the possibility to see what you failed to see so long ago, so please seize to the occasion, and read it one more time. I am confident that you are able to see it through now. " +You would like that wouldn't you KIng Bee and Isotope23, but no material is being deleted and there is no interest in deleting material like King bee would like you to believe, all that is happening is the addition of correct and factual stats, heck, King Bee and Jaranda won't even allow the addition of three direct link to stats of Brett Favre's from espn, cbs and SI, it's getting sad, they are ruing this page of being up to date or anything, it's pure bullying and they should be stopped, only correct and factual stats are trying to be added, no deleting, even a new cit was added, but they delete that too, King Bee and Jaranda and vandalisng the page and getting away with it also, King Bee broke the 3RR rule on the Brett Favre discussion page and Brett Favre main page several times yesterday and no suspention, this is very unjust and something needs to be done here, but no one will, because they have ganned up and they are doing this together and getting away with it, someone needs to step in fast, because this info is correct, compair the edits by user BevrelyHills85 to the current version by Wizardman on the Brett Favre Main Page, all info that is trying to be added by BeverlyHills85 is 100% correct and factual information, but they won't have it, you can't even add the direct link to Brett Favre's stats on ESPN, CBS, and SI in the infobox under stats, they won't allow that, and user PSUMark2006 was the one that approved that, please look into it, malibu55 +Block upgrade To one month, due to same vandal coming right back to it after previous block expired. +" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial Article wizard Policy on neutral point of view I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! –  (Talk • Contributions) " +I don’t know how a statement of consensus needs to be written or supported, so I recommend this one: Following an editing war in October of 2009, a consensus has been found that Barnard degrees are awarded by the Trustees of Columbia University, and that its students are members of the Columbia community, as described in the Barnard Columbia Affiliation Agreement. Best, +v1.0a8 is out now. I stumbled upon the daily pages for RfD while RC patrolling, so I added support for that, too. Glad that I didn't break anything. I still want to add in shortcuts for results. One of these days... +and replace the redirect instruction with whatever content you are adding +NPOV THis article is ar from neatural. THough it may be the common opinion, its not NPOV.71.217.206.152 +"I never added anything either. I was just reverting the information back to what it was before they started this edit war. Also, I really don't know where you're getting this sockpuppeting. Unless I've been hacked, I have never logged into any of these IPs you're accusing of sockpuppeting. ""These types of edits."" You mean your unsourced majority? Multiple IPs coming by and saying ""Megadeth is tr00 hard rock 'cause they sound like it. Kthxbai."" and never logging in again? Gee, sounds now that sounds like sockpuppeting to me. And apparently explaining is ""b**ching"". Well, I think you're just annoyed because I haven't succumbed to your intimidation yet. Like I've said, this place isn't supposed to be a mob. Quantity is not quality, I'm afraid. " +"::::::Of course everyone realizes that there's another article titled On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. Perhaps this companion could absorb the ""history"" (including the problem of ""finitary"" proofs) and ""the aftermath"" (the immediate aftermath, am unclear where the ""contemporary"" aftermath should go) etc while the article associated with this page could be tightened to present explications of the theorems only. Per my comment above I encourage those who are interested mainly in the mathematical end of things (as opposed to the historical) and can lay their hands on it read Kleene's ""seven part"" explication in Volume I of Kurt Godel Collected Works. (On different note, the ""Chinese remainder theorem"" comes up in some (but not all) of the explications. I did a search of our article and found no mention of ""chinese"" or ""remainder"". But when I searched wikipedia I discovered an article Gödel numbering for sequences that contains a detailed discussion of this topic. And here I thought he was relying on the fundamental theorem of arithmetic . . .. What's going on? And, is it just me or is there little or no coordination between these various-but-associated articles?) Bill " +" I've worked in digital cash for about 20 years; it's clear that digital bearer token money (i.e. Chaumian blinded money) could be used to represent arbitrary assets. There is a difference between distributed and centralized systems, and right now the only really viable distributed model is blockchain based, but the distinction shouldn't be ""cryptocurrency vs. non-cryptocurrency"", but ""blockchain-based cryptocurrency vs. blinded token cryptocurrency"". They're both distinct from account-based money. There are ways in which blinded money is actually *more* cryptocurrency than blockchain money by eliminating the historical record of linkability inherent in the blockchain or account-based systems, blinded tokens are inherently fungible, which supports negotiability and finality. I'm not sure what the solution is to this article; move it en-masse to ""blockchain currency"" or merge with bitcoin and then redirect cryptocurrency to digital cash? " +it may, but it is far more vast in it's account then skipmason, i'd have no problem with them both not being used. +" Welcome to Wikipedia. Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ːtalk " +" Wrong information in the article There are many wrong info in the article. Here are the followings with proofs from various sources: 1. Government and Politics: Article:Due to Northern Cyprus' isolation and heavy reliance on Turkish support, Turkey has a high level of influence over the country's politics. This has led to some experts characterising it as an effective puppet state of Turkey. Sources:1 24.05.2012: ""In the 1995 and 1996 Loizidou Judgments the ECtHR treated the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) as a sort of puppet government whose acts fall within the jurisdiction of (and are attributable to) Turkey as an (unlawful) occupier."" 2 09.01.2013: ""The situation with the South African homelands was similar and so was collective non-acceptance of the turkish puppet-government in northern Cyprus which has resulted in the turkish republic of northern Cyprus not being recognized as a state."" 3 27.11.2005 ""It may be argued that the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which was declared in 1983 and which was only recognized as a state by Turkey and for a short period by Pakistan, is at the moment of writing the only existent puppet state in the world.}} Few political decisions in Northern Cyprus are taken without the approval of the Turkish National Security council in Ankara"" 4 04.09.2004 ""The TRNC is not only heavily dependent on Turkey for funding it is also administratively tied with the Turkish institutions so that in some respects it gives the impression of being a province of Turkey... Most profoundly however in ways that are always strongly felt in north Cyprus but are not always evident to outside eyes, it is Turkey that calls the shots."" Realities: 1. USA Federal Court (09.10.2014): ""TRNC is a democratic republic."" (Official summary of Court decision; website of Court decision; Decision of Court) 2. European Court of Human Rights accepted all laws of Northern Cyprus without any exception: Not only the laws of ""Immovable Property Commission of Northern Cyprus (and its related laws)"" but also all laws of Northern Cyprus without any exception are recognized at European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): ECtHR Decision 02.07.2013, App. nos. 9130/09 and 9143/09; Pavlides v. Turkey; Georgakis v. Turkey http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{""fulltext"":[""Pavlides""],""documentcollectionid2"":[""CASELAW""],""itemid"":[""001-122907""]} ECtHR: ""...notwithstanding the lack of international recognition of the regime in the northern area, a de facto recognition of its acts may be rendered necessary for practical purposes. Thus, the adoption by the authorities of the ""TRNC"" of civil, administrative or criminal law measures, and their application or enforcement within that territory, may be regarded as having a legal basis in domestic law for the purposes of the Convention"". Note: In the related above case, the application of Greek Cypriots was immediately found to be ""inadmissable"" by ECtHR and rejected by ECtHR! That is to say, the applicant Greek Cypriots were expelled just at the beginning of the process. Case was never handled by the ECtHR! 3. The number of university students in Northern Cyprus is more than 70,000 (a country with 300,000 population). There are students from 114 different countries. Northern Cyprus is the top 1 country in the ratio of univ.stud/population in the world. How can such a country be ""heavily dependent"" on Turkey? 4. The number of annual tourist visits to Northern Cyprus is more than 1 million (a country with 300,000 population). Northern Cyprus is among the foremost countries in the ratio of tourists/population in the world. How can such a country be ""heavily dependent"" on Turkey? 5. Northern Cyprus has its own Dollar Billionaires. " +tYOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! YOU ARE A MOTHJER FUCKER COCKSUCKER! +A couple of explanations Because I am pretty new to this project and was invited by the Wikipedia policy just to step in and make some edits, I would like apologize for failing to communicate with you effectively, and to clarify a couple of things: 1) I have made in the recent days some substantial contributions and modifications to the Silesia article that I felt would be valuable to the internet readers. I din't expect that some of this changes will meet with such a fierce resistance. 2) These contributions were based on my deep knowledge (in my opinion) and serious studies into the history and modern times of Silesia. My intention was to write about facts and not about opinions, and to avoid any nationalistic bias of any kind. 3) I am very seriously touched that people who introduce most of the chaos and natiolistic bias to this article are the first to accuse others of vandalism and extreme nationalism. 20:45, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC) My suggestion: let's write what Silesia is now The Silesia article DO need some serious improvement if we want it to be the valuable and reliable resource for the internet users. The current (restored and protected) version contains so many errors that it will chase away people with basic historical knowledge, if it's not changed as soon as possible. 1) First I suggest that we write what Silesia is now (as this is most interesting to the reader), and not what is was in the past. Silesia rich history should be discussed in the history section. 2) It is unacceptable to state that Silesia lies between Odra and Vistula rivers. First look at any map will show you that Silesia lies along the Odra river. 3) Silesia lies today in Poland and Czech Republic. It is doubtful if the Goerlitz area is part of Silesia. It is a historical part of Lusatia, and was joined to the Silesian province after 1816. 4) Im my opinion we should not discuss Silesian history in the intro paragraph, but we decide to, it is unacceptable to mention only the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation 5) I do not care in what order the language-names of Silesia are mentioned, but I do insist that the Silesian version (Ślónsk, Ślunsk) is included in this list. 6) I do insist that the various nationalities and ethnic groups living know in SIlesia, are mentioned clearly and the list should include at least: the Silesians, the Poles, the Germans, the Czechs 7) The theories about the name of the region must be clearly marked as theories and not as facts. The passages need some minor rewrite. 8) The remarks about HRE overlordship in 1146 and 1163 are simply false, no longer upheld by the German historians, and must be removed 9) Great care must be taken when dealing with Silesian history, for example the rude remarks about devastation was caused by Hussite rebellion must be rewritten using neutral words 10) The Silesia article need more sections on the People, Economy, Culture, Education, Science and Tourism. 20:55, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC) +P.S. I may create a new vectorised version when I have the time, with the segments. +Ryulong Frank, please stop taking sides, check out my talk page and you will see that Ryulong is continuing this, tell him to stop, don't let him abuse me without my right to respond. +When an article is on the front page (DYK) it attracts a lot of attention. I am sure Circeus wants what almost all editors want, to make Wikipedia as good an encyclopedia as possible. Remember this is an enyclopedia that anyone can edit (and will). We are to assume good faith by policy, and there are warnings against both 'owning' an article and calling other users names (at least repeatedly). Always try to talk things out on talk pages. More soon on uploading pictures - the quickest way would be to upload it here for now (on Wikipedia) and if you want I could upload it to Commons. If you want I can also walk you through Commons. Take care, +Notes to self: Things to do once block expires Finnish creating pages for Project articles under review Link those to the Project to do lists Create pages for Portal:Film in the United States/Selected biography/1 (5 pages to start) Portal:Film in the United States/Selected picture/1 (5 to start) Portal:Film in the United States/Did you know (365 pages) Portal:Film in the United States/News (365 pages) Fix problems with Template:WikiProject United States (8 so far) Finish verifying and updating MOH recipients recently created. Will add more later. +" Horse articles I agree that the use of ""Footnotes"", (or simply Notes) ""Citations"" and ""References"" is perfectly acceptable. However, there is no consistency in the way these terms are used and on quite a few of the FA articles the term ""Footnotes"" is used in place of ""Citations"" (or References) and on at least two articles the notes were labelled ""Notes"" and the citations were labelled ""Footnotes"". There appears to be some misunderstanding as to when and where the terms ""Notes"" and/or ""Footnotes"" ought to be used. If ""Citations"" is the preferred heading for inline references, then you need to take this up with others who write about horses. My point here is specifically to eliminate the wrong usage of the term ""Footnotes"" for sections that do not contain anything that even vaguely resembles a footnote. Since consistency appeared to be an issue, I changed a number of articles, simply to make them consistent. They have been changed back, and unless someone has subsequently corrected them, are no longer consistent. " +I have a question: I was trying to add a reference today (June 28) to a new article by Nicholas Benton relevant to Ken Kronberg's death on the Ken Kronberg page, when I discovered that all the references and external notes at the bottom of the page seemed to have disappeared. Did I do that by mistake? These referencesto Benton's articles, the Washington Post, external websites, etc.need to be replaced! Thank you. +Photo You can see her tit.69.243.42.251 +Suspected sockpuppetry I say, do you think that there is some bizarre, yet subtle sockpuppetry going on over there, right at the bottom ?! More likely closer to you than to me, if you get my gist! Anyway, thank you! Ta-ra! +I don't watch the page but stumbled upon it, great work. Not sure a Google Video result is the best thing to cite even if that's the only way to incorporate the info. +article. Melodic death metal may have evolved, but In Flames' recent albums do not stack up to recent melodeath albums by recent or long-standing melodeath bands +" Re:Is Wikipedia considered non commercial as far as uploading CC images? -''''''(TALK) " +. Keep it up, and in time, others will let you know about it as well +Thanks! I was looking at Beckey, and didn't find Lytton, so thought it may have been OR. — +I have serious problems Can I contact you with an e-mail? +" Heterogeneous System Architecture Support for ARM big.LITTLE with either In-kernel switcher (CPU migration) or Heterogeneous multi-processing (global task scheduling) is missing. Other possible HSA-features are missing. E.g. the ARM Cortex-A15 features stuff, that elder CPUs do not. More documentation on that would be nice. " +my draft into WikiSpace +"Wikipedia:WikiProject Calvinism/News}}) for this project. The methods I'd recommend for doing this are any or all of: Add the abovementioned page to your watchlist Include the page on another page you look at regularly; in my case, this is my user page, since I keep my personal ""todo"" list there. That would look something like: {{" +Category:I have given the link for the information, its from the Milagrow Humantech offical website +very aware of a good or deadhorse article at its earliest stage +I agree. There's no need to have the day of the week in the lead, although it is appropriate somewhere else in the article. +Another Wikipedia guideline for you to read: assume good faith. Also, for you to compare: Shrikhande's, Nash-Williams', your, and my publication records in Google scholar. I realize that MathSciNet might be a better choice of database for mathematicians, but my own work is not primarily in the math literature and the pattern there is in any case not very different. The point is that for Shrikhande and Nash-Williams I can see clear evidence of notability just from the Google scholar citation counts. For you I can't, and would need some other justification for having an article here. That's why I removed the redlink. — +" Yep. It was on the major Italian newspaper today, too. Given the fame, I'd like at least a picture with Jimbo Wales to show to my friends! talk " +Catch me - if you can ;) +you fat asshole, why don't you leave my page alone. what, it's not enoguh for you to stick your nosey nerd-ass troll figners on the page for my personal high school, you have to decide what belongs on ym persoanl user pagfes too. keep it up, mother fucker, and youll get yours, i swear to fucking christ. see WP:TOUCHMYSHITAGAINANDYOULLLEARNWAHTITMEANSTOTOSSASALADFATNERDFUCKINGTROLLPIECEOFSHITASSWIPE by the way, i blanked the suer profile page because that comment didnt belogn there. it was supposed to go on the talk page, but noone could get into it. im not a kike, or an atheist, so leaving it on there has no relelvance, got it? +I don't want the van Sant page deleted. I was talking about the discussion about an image of him on my talk page. That discussion is obsolete. I might try to get the proposed article about him resurrected at some point. +" May 2011 (UTC) I notice that this RfC is dead but SH just removed a sock's comment. I actually do think this conversation is fine staying open since there is not consensus and inclusion v not is essentially WP:FREQUENT. I did not notice NickCT's comment until now but wanted to address it since we have already gone over this but people seem to forget or have to rattle it off everytime it comes up. I for one think ""massacre"" in some form should be mentioned in the lead. Unfortunately, the assertion that it is what ""people involved call it"" is contradicted by the following: Gaza Victory: enough said but just a reminder, it can't be a massacre and a victory can it? ""Gaza Massacre"" has been disputed as a title with the sources mirroring its forced use on Wikipedia Hamas did not have an official name for it. This has been discussed and it is a point conceded by those in favor of inclusion. Hamas simply did not use its limited PR capabilities to clearly lay this out as their preferred title (see point 1). But back to my point of keeping this open. I have offered two solutions. Nableezy has rejected at leas one of them. Include ""it has been called a massacre"". No bold. Not an alternative title. Just simply lay it out there. One editor recently provided a source calling it ""Massacre in Gaza"". It was obviously referred to as a massacre. or Include every title that was verifiably used in RS at a ratio of tens of thousands to one. This could be accomplished by actually adding information in the lead about the media and its relation t this topic. This would increase the quality of the article by meeting WP:LEAD] by being an actual summary. I'm not going to lie, I think it is time to change the title of this article altogether. notice that other language's Wikipedia projects refer to it as the Israeli operational name (some editors have equated this to POV even though it is a very common and accurate title) or one laying out the dates and calling it a conflict (as we used to do but it was really long). That discussion will eventually come up again and any decision here will get scuttled by it (or the opposite). But it is clear that giving prominence to a very little used and POV dripping title in the lead is not acceptable to many editors without thoughtful balancing. Two easy options are presented to you. It is my hope that the word massacre is used in the lead but how to do it is a hurdle. And add on top of that that we still don't even have a good main title and it shows that this process has been broken since day 1. Day 1 was years ago. 03:16, 28" +" Feel free to add it then. I think I wrote the current use in games consoles part for the most part, and I'm personally not all that familiar with the Saturn (I can only really write about what I know). Alphathon  (talk) " +" I don't want to surf to 5 different pages to get an overview of the kind of graphics the N64 could produce. This isn't just for now, this is for the future, too. @ " +Presumably, HH Alan is not in this picture, so its inclusino cannot be justified. and for illustrative purposes of how relevant the above picture is here, is another man called Alan: thumb|500px|center +I wold agee that someone in the House of Lords or the owner of HOUse of Fraser is automatically notable - however, this was not stated in the article +User talk:Zipzor Just noticed you gave him a final warning, well, he's at it again, see his contributions, he just created an attack page. +Antonia Yo dudies! I hav a questionL Why was it removed? It is her middle name according to creppy ric lol so yeah It should be there.. +NEW request by site editor +" Name Change You Need to change your name to ""snobby"" as does every other admin on this fucking page " +I did not find this on any search, this is an orignal statement... Richie Moore +2007 (UTC) I beg to differ. The history is hugely important for licensing reasons, and I've just spent a good 15 minutes trying to undo the tangled web of page histories. If you come across another move that you can't make in future, please ask an admin. for assistance; use WP:RM if necessary, but don't just copy and paste. That really is the worst option. 08:14, 18 May +I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. On Wikipedia, Jews are hunted down and banned like dogs then given a brand of some other random banned user. Typical racist Web site. +Merged Brad Hunstable== I completed the merge == +Please keep in mind that he is an idiot and maybe once someone calls him on his bullshit, he'll shut the fuck up. This is your final warning, get the fuck off my page. +" Incivility/No personal attacks Edit summaries like this are highly innappropriate. Please read WP:CIVIL and No personal attacks. You've already been warned about vandalism. Please stop your disruptive editing, or you'll be blocked. Thanks. msg me " +" No, you have not explained how ""X is Y"" is somehow not clearer, simpler and more objective than ""X is best known for Y"". You have not explained why you are insisting on putting opinions into the article. You are too stupid to distinguish between fact and opinion and that's a remarkable handicap for someone who is editing an encyclopaedia. You really should learn the difference. In the mean time, perhaps my next edit will indicate to you just what a moronic crusade you are on here. 190.162.52.196 " +" ""It is blatant spam and used to promote a commercial interest."" " +" GA delisted at WP:GA/R. Talk " +If that was true, you wouldn't need to lie on Wikipedia would you? you wouldn't need to constantly make things up and create fake lists of inventions that you had nothing to do with right? Pathetic. 69.158.28.97 +Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Dust Bowl, you may be blocked from editing. +I'm not sure, but Fred may have impacted Cape Verde as a depression. Can anyone confirm or disprove this? +Sara: In regards to the COI, there's no question that I do work for the subject of the article. HealthMonitor 4:05 pm, 18, October 2015. +Internet censorship You just told me you undid a serious contribution that I made to Wikipedia about internet censorship. You just censored me over the internet! You claim this is an encyclopedia but it is a free one that free one that relies on the public to contribute. Maybe you should hire a paid staff. A couple of other of your cohorts have accused me of touching articles I haven't been to. Maybe if you didn't censor edits and articles, You would not find vandals. I have already seen inaccurate articles here. Wikipedia is unreliabe. +Navigation I've heard conflicting conflicting accounts of how bees navigate, namely from one source that they use radio waves (citing speculation that mobile phone masts have caused them disorientation) and from another that they use the sun. Which is true? +Our policy on edit-warring provides an exemption on removing WP:BLP violations. There is no exemption on restoring WP:BLP violations. In fact, the burden of proof lies with the editor restoring the contentious content. +Additional school history information - year built, reason for building campus, etc. +RSS a new tech? This article mentions RSS being a new technology. Is something that was invented about 6+ years ago considered new? +(UTC) I see that the List of people from San Francisco was voted to remain, I have followed that lead as these lists will only grow larger and cannot remain on the main city page with cluttering it up. 06:38, 22 September 2007 +" Taiwan as belligerent Hello, I know that Taiwan offered military support (see Max Hasting's book on the Korean War) but it is my understanding that it was refused as ""too provocative"" (along with Cuba etc.) to the PRC? Taiwan is currently listed in the belligerents section. Could someone comment on this or offer any evidence to the contrary please? '''' " +It's nice to see a positive message posted on this page every once in a while. Thanks! +Please unblock me i won't do it again, I don't want to wait six months. Please unblock me.98.236.110.176 +Why are you letting them vandalize the agreed-on version? +Los Angeles According to the article he was playing for Los Angeles Galaxy between 2007-2012. Therefore he was resident there for 11 months of the year ! +" Margaret MANNY? What is the basis for ""Manny"" being the surname of Margaret, Countess of Norfolk, a predecessor to this Thomas, Earl and later Duke of same? Click the link and go to the article ON this predecessor Margaret, and the word ""Manny"" can't be found there. The only noteworthy and historical Margaret Manny that Google knows is Wikipedia's flag-seamstress active in North America in the revolutionary 1770's. As Jon Lovitz might say, ""So, that would be later"".2604:2000:C6AA:B400:7456:5EE0:243F:BF4C Christopher L. Simpson" +" Exhibit A. Nothing false about that? Realy? Anyhow, I ""fucking"" reinstated one lost comment of yours and you might not be aware of, but WP is not censored so my ""fucking"" remark is covered and allowed by policy and you have to deal with it. But enough now. I'm getting too attached (just like you although it's still a long way for me...) and, I still didn't had dinner and have to expect my punishment for that later. So bye.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) " +" I so wish you could see it (not the state of dismay; I've kind of re-written the vanished bits, but nowhere near...). You'd love it; everything's there... you name it. The last ""exhibit"" was unspeakably moving; enlightening and troubling; emotionally bewildering but ultimately so life-affirming. Actually, the catalogue's pretty damn fine; though like the reconstructions of vanished articles, not at all the same... " +" Thank you for unblocking me. I feel a one month block without warning for ""repurposing/reposting others' talk page comments on different pages"" (which in my view was just trying to keep discussion in one place) on a productive editor to be manifestly excessive, and I believe it should also be lifted or substantially reduced. " +" Your edit to Christian Byersa Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. 6 talk " +Apart from a select few examples, and all? the Tfl ones, I am not entirely sure that routes deserve their own articles at all, so I can't really committ wholeheartedly to improving them. I've stayed away from the issue of whether multi-operator lists are noteworthy, under NOT#GUIDE, I can see a day when anything improved in that area might still go up for deletion anyway, no matter how good they are. I should have said in the original drive than any standalone operator lists spun out for size reasons should be examined as being in scope of the main drive. +Process question re arbitration remedies Pure curiosity only, so apologies in advance if I end up being one of a stream of people knocking at your door today, but I'm genuinely wondering. I noticed that the remedies in the date delinking case were updated based on the revisions that were passed recently. I'm just wondering if there's a usual way that the case page is updated for something like this? It appears that you overwrote the new remedies on top of the old ones, with the original date and vote totals remaining in place — as a result, without checking the history, it looks as though that were the original remedy. In a different remedy revised earlier, the new remedy was entered with the current date and vote total, and the original remedy was placed into a collapse box. It's probably as simple as different clerks, different approaches, but I guess I was a little surprised there's no defined process for something like this. Regards, +Go away, no one cares. +Asian Gaylord Hello, could you please explain why you are such an asian gaylord ? (also known as chink fag) If you're not familiar with the term it is someone of chinese, korean, japanese, or other asian descent whom enjoys homosexual behavior with other males. This involves receiving and delivering. It has come to my attention you are a giant chink fag and I was wondering how you became such a chink fag ? 216.145.245.75 +Use in popular culture This song has been sung or performed in TV and movies before. The most easily remembered occurance of this is in the first Lilo and Stitch film. If you know of any others, we may have enough to start a new section of the article. - +Yes I do, a common argument about this article is a strong North American bias throughout, editors have spent the past week addressing these and other issues and managed to get the page to GA status, it stands to reason to make a note in the FAQ as many of the issues raised in the FAQ have now been addressed. +Or go to sleep so you can get eaten by clowns (what kind of gay name is that? Dumbest name i have ever seen) +Where to categorize this article? I noticed that this article's talk page was recently added to the Wiki Schools Project. I decided to take a look there and to me, it seems like this article doesn't seem like it has much of a home there. Although a school bus does have an education-minded name, it is primarily a vehicle; the education articles here seem to be focused towards the specific school buildings....the article would be a fish out of water there and would be tagged needlessly. Any other opinions? +New Image Copyright I am new to this I really want my image to be kept. That image came from my blog at http://diamondhoggers.blogspot.com, and I uploaded it myself. I have tried to denote this in the copyright and it won't work. Can someone help me put it as free use or CopyrightedFreeUse-Link|Your website}} +probably without even reading them I found very rude. But I am sorry for insulting you. +active autoblocks] on this user after accepting the unblock request. | +" The ""reliable source"" is the ""actual source"" itself. The National Alliance or www.natall.com . Go check it out for yourself. It, the NA, exists. The new Chairman is William White Williams, since Erich Gliebe resigned, and it is now a membership organization, as in the ""join us"" link. What else makes that so difficult for you to understand? No source is more reliable than is the direct source and vs any second-hand source." +My views I replied to you with all of my views. Normally I just give short details of it and give more when people respond. It makes for long AfDs and whatnot, but that's how I've always discussed things online. +If you were to write a Nanotechnology and a Nanoscience article, how different would they be? Surely they would end up referencing each other dozens of times. Nanotechnology is a good title for a page that summarizes the physical inventions and the ideas involved. If someone wants details on the hard science that goes into nanotechnology, they can look at more specific articles, e.g. self-assembly, atomic force microscopy, microfluidics, et cetera. +Just to say I don't like either the word terrorist (such an abused term it's ridiculous) or the word extremist (tells you precisely nothing). +" See British colonization of the Americas, and next time remember, this is an encylopedia, not a reference desk to do your research for you. '''iro''' " +" please produce the free image or i will reintroduce the fair use image. seven days should be sufficient. ⇔ †@1₭ " +For God's sake... Why can't everyone agree on something? +Dedicate time? go ahead delete the stupid thing. You guys on here don't do that great of a job on here anyway. i will call whoever i want a fat cow +" / CAT:Assyrian stubs I think you should calm down with deleting the Assyrian-stub from every Assyrian person just because you, in all your ignorance, consider them ""not notable"". You're not an expert on every Assyrian, and you don't now whether they're notable or not. For instance, Sargis Bkheera is indeed a very notable Assyrian, and his Wikipedia entry is as of now, a stub. Hence, the Assyrian stub in his case is just fine. By the way, the Assyrian flag is much more contemporary to the Assyrian nation at the moment, than Ashurbanipal. |Talk 20:21, 14 Jun, 2007 (UTC)" +Thanks, TK. I am actually okay with the latest rearrangement by ONY - it looks better than what she tried to do before. And, by the way, ONY, I did not revert the Maurette reference. Please read the edit history before attributing edits to people. +i hate lilian allen, she's a b*tch who made fun of Cheryl Cole and she writes mean songs. She seems like a mean, nasty wh*re. +" (Belated for edit conflict) Let me try to respond to that: I already said before that we are not at an international meeting discussing the accreditation of the TRNC delegates. We are writing an encyclopedia and that is it. Even as I see unnecessary, let me refer you to the sovereign territories called British Bases which even have their ""customs administration"" and ""police"". Read well especially the last two articles. You will see that there is another ""sovereignty"" on part of the Island of Cyprus. (Only for whipping brains: Even if there were no Cyprus question at all, -maybe some day, when the ""United Republic of Cyprus"" is established-, still the sovereignty over the island would be split, between that of this Republic and UK.) " +" It has nothing to do with middle east being a ""bad word"". Asia is a continent. Middle east isn't. When you locate a country, you typically state what continent it is in first. " +Do me a favour. Do you really think you're the first to wave that big stick at me? I'll tell you what I tell everyone who waves it; stick it up your arse. Fatuorum +" Great! Thanks ;)  TALK! " +" MfD nomination of User:Roberteditorwriter/sandbox . Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Roberteditorwriter/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of ✆✎ " +" Nude beach & controversy In using the terms I have used in writing and revising this part of this article, I have sought to improve the article for the widest reading audience. I do believe the words I chose when writing this part do serve that end better than some of the changes another keeps making. All opinions are of equal value in Wikipedia, including this part of the article about a legal controversy, even if I feel that I bring to the table both an English degree and a Juris Doctor. I have learned in my experience that some legal terms (e.g., ""upheld"" being misunderstood understood to mean ""held up,” rather than being more correctly understood as an action more akin to ""approving"" a lower court’s decision) can be confusing to all levels of readers, intelligent well-educated readers and average readers alike. Yet, on the other hand, one does not want to completely avoid the use the accurate legal terms for those readers who understand and appreciate their use. This is why I have used parentheses and the like to clarify or expand upon some terms." +Bleaney, there is no need to mention free schools and academies. It is irrelevant. Academies are not new anyway. UTCs are just state schools with autonomy, leave it alone and stop edit warring. +DYK nom Template:Did you know nominations/Schwingt freudig euch empor, BWV 36 +July 2011 Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +"saying ""daily use"" is contraindicated" +Actually Actually, this edit has been done before by an anon ip, and been reverted in the past by myself and others. Please stop these nonsense edits and support information with citations. Thanks. . +One of the things that puzzles me is why image uploaders are able to cope with the fact that Wikimedia Commons is entirely organized around scientific names, yet readers of the encyclopaedia are supposed to be unable to do so. +" Sanctions imposed against Triton Rocker and LevenBoy I have commented on your actions regarding the above at AN/I. Please see the thread here. Talk " +It was pretty much a blueblood-only game in those days as well. +Hi I have found some more links for you http://www.wwfindia.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/freshwater_wetlands/our_work/ramsar_sites/harike_wetlands_.cfm and http://www.birding.in/birdingsites/harike_lake.htm and also http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/1997/ts7/ts7008.asp and finally a brilliant article on the History http://www.punjabheritage.org/architectural-heritage/local-enthusiasm-but-official-neglect-for-anglo-sikh-war-monuments2704.html +" Deleted viewer Hey Interiot, a while back we had a discussion here and you rigged up a deleted edit viewer; if you don't mind, I'd like to get a copy of the code to be able to run an installation of it in my toolserver account. Could you point me in the right direction? (Talk • ) " +" Sure, my dear friend! Holla at me! " +" Hi there, OK, I see what you've done here - almost a 'pseudo-link' that refers you to a list of references at page-bottom as opposed to inserting the titles, authors, etc, in brackets in the actual sentence. Could you forward me the ""code"" to use in order to have, for example, this reference linked to the bottom of the page: Como Llego La Noche, Matos, Huber, Tusquets-2004 Thanks much - this seem to read much more easily when referencing in this manner." +" Hey Martin. Spoondfeeding required! Where exactly—at the very end after ? At the end of the template main text just after }}{{{PS|}}} +My very own personalized barnstar - you are too kind, SL. Really appreciate the gesture. - (talk) +That is an unsubstantiated, ad homain, disgusting suggestion. I was not attempting to synthesis, if i advertantly did, you reacted with venom. +Also please note my response to the Feb 'incident'. +" th th thanks for deleting my fucking thing that ive been trying to work on, get a fucking life get a job other than be being a dick and make sure that you dont delete others peoples shit otherwise your never gonna get a fucking woman and i can tell you dont have one due to the fact that one) look at you two) what kinda shit do you put on your facebook? bcozz the shit you put on here is pointless and three) your a fucking asshole by trying to ruin peoples hard work that theyre trying to actually succede in? nice guy uh huh.... so anyway good fucking bye and you deserve nothing and i hope you get less =:) " +" Your Wiki etiquette faux pas I note your lack of adherence to Wikipedia Etiquette with regard to following written procedure and notifying the aggrieved party of the alleged infraction of this subjective: ""civility"" issue. I am more than willing to overlook this error. I do question your interest in an issue which is tangential in extreme to yourself. I note with interest Merbabu effectively agrees with my edits and the rationale behind them. Though it does indeed raise the issue of conflict of interest. It could be charged Singaporeans and Australians, as beneficiaries of British theft/colonialism, is the issue of ""conflict of interest"" pertinent here? Does Mr Dave have an opinion on this- and perhaps can elucidate in manner a simple Malay may understand, to clarify whether or not you feel you may or may not have a conflict of interest with regards to any military article of Indoneisa- I keenly await your own learned views on ""conflict of interest"". Sincerely " +You attacked my post and removed it like you were a demigod when you are really nothing but a facist and you have the nerve to say YOU DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO ME. mAYBE i SHOULD REMOVE EVERY EDIT YOU EVER POSTED BUT THEM i'M ONLY TRYING TO POST THINGS THAT WILL HELP SEEKERS OF THE TRUTH WHILE YOU ARE ON A TRIP TO FEEND YOUR GOD-COMPLEX. GO AHEAD CRY BABY PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN BUT AT LEAST BE HONEST AND STOP CALLING YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN, WE KNOW YOU ARE NOT BECAUSE YOU REJECT THE bible69.14.97.53 +Ah, there is a very good reason that i warned Mark and not WMC. WMC presumably knows what he is doing. While Mark is still a newbie in many ways, who is still stumling around abit finding his legs. +" Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester. The reason I have put on the PROD is that the article simply duplicates information in the existing article Roman Catholic Diocese of Worcester, which is too short to need splitting. " +Wosner, ואזנר His own official briefhead says Shmuel Halevi Wosner. And in Hebrew it says ואזנר, with one vav. So I changed things accordingly. | (talk) +Hi, testing the talk pages! +" is a mere ""British ad executive"" notable enough to have a wikipedia entry? Do all ad executives get one in that case? Just a thought... " +SuperHamster is Super Pathetic Hey everybody, SuperHamster here. I'm really lonely and sad and pathetic mostly because I have no friends and spend all my time vandalizing Wiki pages. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/be/Cabbit.jpg +I have given full reason on the discussion page. I don't need test edits to remove your lies. Peter Clatworthy. +With respect, what we find 'acceptable' has caused the debate and 'edit wars' here. A compromise seems to have been reached, based upon the definitions of Canadian / French / British American within Wikipedia itself. (See those articles). I think if people disagree, then they should be editing those articles to make them more acceptable rather than the articles / categories that result from using those definitions. +Category:Climate change skepticism :Category:Climate change skepticism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. +Ask User talk:Raul654. Gimmetrow +" Disambiguation link notification for May 4 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sliding bookcase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Record Courier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, . 1000 " +Reference desk this is a general message to all concerned, not a personalised response Hello, I have removed opinion based answers to the question on firefighting on the humanities reference desk. Please note that offering opinions can lead to arguments as was beginning to happen on this topic. Sorry for the inconvenience.83.100.251.196 +" Well, why didn't you point this out in the first place instead of acting like a nutcase and telling me I'm ""censoring"" things? Stop acting as if you own the article. Your bully tactics don't really work on wikipedia and certainly not with me. Please refrain from deleting good faith edits and labelling them as ""vandalism"". One more thing, please fucking read the policies before you jump into bed with them, okay? Then fuck off and implement them. I really don't have time wasting my efforts on slime-of-an-editor like you who always acts as a troll and misuses his tools.. Talk Contribs " +"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" id=""talkheader"" align=""center"" style=""background-color: #FFFFEE;"" |- ! colspan=""3"" style=""border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color:#F8EABA; text-align:center;"" | This is 's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to . |- |align=""center""| | style=""background-color: #FFFFEE;"" | Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text, but please don't create a new section if a relevant one already exists, even if there is older discussion below. Click here to start a new section. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. I will attempt to respond to your talk page whenever possible. If you prefer to respond to me on your own talk page, please leave me a note telling to to refer there, such as Template:Talkback. Otherwise, I might not check your talk page for a while. If a third party gets involved, it will go to hell quickly and get confusing, so we might want to try a centrallized discussion page. If you're here to be uncivil or a dick, you may as well not bother. I won't be able to respect a message that insults me, so don't waste your time. If you are unhappy with something I've done, then address your concerns to me in a manner that begets mutual respect; you're more likely to get what you want like that. I'm not an administrator, and can't help you with anything like that. If you need help, try here. I have talk page stalkers who may address you before I can. Please respect them and thier comments. | style=""margin: 0px; background-color: #F8EABA; border: 1px solid #C0C090; "" | Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming |}" +" DIE! Die you piece of shit. chat " +" Proof to this statement? He just reported me for abusing him for calling him the word ""troll"" Nuff said about this moderator." +Fucking white trash cunt Could you also be more careful with the revert button. Edouard-Henri Aril (Talk) - +HOW DARE YOU, TOO....... HOW DARE YOU FOR ATTACKING ME! +I've been tempted to work on Saurpoda to FA. Do you think its doable? +" The charge of the proof is for the one who brings information. What is ""Ariel encyclopaedia"" ? " +Eric Brown-Bey Please don't delete Eric Brown-Bey, I think he should have wikipedia page. +Thanks for your reply. It's enough for me to know the general views about the cars above. +" Taulant has ""reported"" in many admins.....Please keep it here Taulant.him and me Taulant admins read the history of pages what do you think you will accomplish by lying? " +Nancy monitors the speedy delete requests. I tagged the KVMX redirect page for speedy delete in order to move the page and she took care of the move for me (sometimes the admins just delete the page and I have to move it myself). I really think the KBKO page should remain a disambiguate page with a listing for KVMX stating it was formerly KBKO-FM, that way they can still get to the new station if they happen to type KBKO. That's generally how we handle this kind of change. +""" as she was known as ""McDonald"" to punters). However, I neither can recall or confirm from memory whether retaining the name was also legally as well. Maybe an email to duty office could confirm this. '''''' (talk • contribs) " +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 110th United States Congress, you will be blocked from editing. ~TalkContribs - If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." +" Source of Vandalism ""Under the heading ""Life as a Child,"" I added the sentence ""But even as an embryo, John Quincy Adams could feel pain and was a Founding Father."" I was logged out at the time, but my IP address (68.237.191.33) was recorded. If you do a reverse lookup of that, you'll see it belongs to pool-68-237-191-33.pghk.east.verizon.net. ""pghk"" stands for 'Poughkeepsie-Kingston.'"" The author can be found here: http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&hl;=en&safe;=off&site;=&source;=hp&q;=gus+mueller+dug+hill&btnG;=Search#sclient=psy&hl;=en&safe;=off&source;=hp&q;=gus+mueller+%2B%22dug+hill%22&aq;=&aqi;=&aql;=&oq;=gus+mueller+%2B%22dug+hill%22&pbx;=1&bav;=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp;=fce33a84b0764b22&biw;=960&bih;=437 Here is the non-copyrighted source: http://asecular.com/index.php?110704" +" A kitten for you! go to petsnearby.com " +I'm no expert, but I think use like that is allowed if the CD or the CD cover is actually discussed within the article text. Another example is the famous Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band record cover used in the Beatles article. +the Boroughs council,it definitly dosent go to Manchester Council,the same with Bury,Wigan,Rochdale and Oldham. Bolton,Bury,Wigan,Rochdale and Oldham all have their own individual councils and your council tax goes to the council of the Borough you live in,not Manchester. +I can see why your patron met the fate he did. That's fine, let's turn backpage Wiki into the credible part of it. +) No issues. Just needed something called how many casualties during a battle like above Endor.( +" As usual, you make a lot of remarks for which there is no reliable source. The set of ""nobody"" using real ASCII terminals is probably orders of magnitude larger than the extent ""termcap users"". You might consider spending some time looking for published sources which are relevant to your intent. " +" Issue on images still unresolved Slim, I'm copying this message and my reply to your page for your notice. I appreciate your inputs in Image talk:Monkey3.jpg and I agree once in a while I might sound rude (purely unintentional, since I put facts blantly). But SlimVirgin is abusing his admin power to overrule anyone. Slim is not a ""he"". Given that she named herself after a Javanese princess, perhaps you could take the hint and note that she's a woman. Also, I don't think you were simply blunt. I think you were rude to Slim. I recognise it's a fine line but given that I've mentioned it to you, perhaps you'll take more care to stay on the right side of it? She has suggested in an email to me, that she is in talks with another editor. Now, I don't know who this other editor and i certainly don't like this secrecy. Instead of having a discussion on this, she wants to finish the matter begind closed doors. She could've atleast told me who this reputed editor was to let me have a word with him/her. Perhaps she is seeking guidance on how she should approach you and wants that to be untainted by your input. I think that would be reasonable. I have a high regard for Slim and I don't think she would have a nefarious purpose in speaking to a third party. Inso far as the images are concerned, I had stated to her a couple of images on one issue (animal rights) is ok, but she insists she needs to showcase the entire album provided by PETA and its assocites. So you have a dispute. You need to recognise that you are not necessarily right! You disagree about how many images are necessary. I feel that you have to allow that your disagreement might be fuelled by your political differences as much as how you interpret the image policy. This should could easily achieve by providing an external link to the images provided by a controversial organization. The BUAV is not a ""controversial organisation"". It is a highly respected body, whose voice is listened to in all circles of British society. A viewpoint doesn't become ""controversial"" just because you don't share it. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and not have extreme viewpoints - But you expect it to reflect your viewpoint. thus I requested her to limit her fair use policy in this regard to 2-3 images which can be used across similar articles. this she refuses. I don't see how it is any fairer to use one, two or ten images in this instance. While I agree that Slim could have taken more care to provide a rationale for using the images, I simply don't feel that your argument about how many she should have used has much weight. One factor in deciding fair use is how much of a thing you use, that's true, but it's only one factor, and obviously, each picture is a separate case to be considered as well as part of a whole. As far as the other images, some are on personalities she claims have ""agreed"" to use their photos here. Unless she gets a written consent and a permission how can I believe. First of all, you can believe Slim because you assume good faith. Perhaps you're not aware of that policy. Yes, you can ask Slim to provide evidence of that, but your assumption should be that she has in fact acquired that agreement. Harassing another editor to provide evidence to your satisfaction and insisting you won't believe them until they have do not show an assumption of good faith. Once I pointed out that {permission} photos would be deleted anyway, she backed off and argued that it be kept on the grounds of fair use asking me to trust her. Yes, okay. Trust her AND ask for proof. Both of us are editing in good faith, but one of us has power and a circle of friends to back her while the other (me) relies on the hope that ppl. like you will help me out in this. I'd urge you to rely on the issues rather than the personalities. Yes, Slim does have powerful friends, who will back her regardless, but you should still do your best to make it about the issue in question and not about her. If she gets away with this and sets a precedence then I'm afraid there are hordes of copyviolaters straining at the leashes to bomb Wikipedia with copyrighted information. ''I think that's a bit dramatic but I agree that she has to obey the rules, which exist for good reason, and shouldn't be given a pass just because she is friends with the arbcom. However, she is not a ""copyviolater"" trying to destroy Wikipedia. Partly, I think she simply didn't understand your problem, and that was in part a failure of your communication, and partly she has become too used to having her views echoed by her friends and doesn't handle disagreem +The editor is likely another sock of Fahey. +REDIRECT Talk:1966 U.S. Open (golf) +I mean seriously, who are you? Are you joking? You make a couple of posts saying that the categories do not belong but don't explain why. You got to be kidding me. Your posts make it seem like you are a little kid. +Cool, thats good to know ) Thanks for your time +I think I have justified it now. How does that look? +" Not insulting the editor who wrote it, but it's poor. Far too long, it doesn't really summarise events but presents them in step-by-step fashion making it difficult to render down to a summary, and spelling, grammar and tone (""Just when things could not get worse"", ""not knowing that another battle was about to begin.""etc). I dunno what was wrong with the previous summary, apart from the fact that it didn't mention the ending. " +You are a complete idiot, you are trying to ruin the reputation of a man who served his country faithfully for over 20 years, it is apparent that that THE AUTHENTICATOR IS WRONG, Charles graduated with me you peanut headed ass, and class 117 did graduate in September of 82, it is apparent you believe everything you read, That article which was written on him was not only quoted as he said this or that, he did not, as a matter of fact do some fact checking, he sued the paper for misrepresentation, because he refused to speak with them on any subject, so they spoke with Jon Andretti who said a load of bullshit. The sad part is Chuck does not no anything about any of your antics or even being on Wikipedia and now you because of you he is on a phonies board. That is disgraceful and so are you. Get your facts right, you fucking idiot. Bob McMeans +. What happened intermittingly, in which the Turks invaded these Iranian tribes, and the Albanians were driven out, and imposed their language on them via Elite Dominance, does not change their original ancestory +Like I said, whether or not they are far right can be discussed with sources in sections below. If the EDL describes itself as a human rights organisation then that's what they'll be introduced as, then later discussion can allow the reader to decide for themselves what's what. +BISE You are allowing Snowded to take the piss at the thread on Ireland. It's a valid suggestion I've made and is a different issue from the previous debate. Maybe it could be extended to include Great Britain. +" To answer your question, no. There is no significant lasting impact on the game as a whole. [[User talk:Jojhutton|Hutton]] " +" ""Corroborating evidence"" is unclear and is another way of saying ""I don't want this information on the web-page because I am opposed to it."" As I stated before, the information should be on the page, particularly since it is biographical information that the person about whom the biography was written has stated publicly, both in the Google Video and under testimony during Charles Calderon's proposal of the porn tax bill before the California state assembly. I am not deleting any of your information, but you are deleting mine. If you don't approve of facts that have been stated by and individual - and they are biographical facts - then you may create an entire separate section on Lubben on this webpage. Please refrain from deleting sources and citations.Veritas, Semper " +Give me a time and a place Niteshift. You need a wake-up call. +Yugal rana magar Yugal rana magar He is a boy who belong to a rana's family. He was born in 2056 B.S , falgun 16, jhimhime rupandehi. He recently came to butwal for the giod study and sat with his grand father and grand mother . His grand father's name is Deu bahadur rana and grand mother's name is bal kumari rana . His father and mother name is Tara bahadur rana and kamala rana. He has one sister name Tirsana rana and his beloved uncle Rohit rana +New histmerge feature Hi Mikaey. You might already know about this (and if so, please feel free to ignore this), but there's a new feature that can help with histmerges in some cases, Special:MergeHistory. Check out Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive263#A Wikipedia feature I just discovered today - good for history merges for a little bit of discussion about it if you're interested. Cheers, +Novembemmmmmeerrrr 90231 Three, four, six, seven, eight, nine are not used on any modern Mongolian banknotes I am aware of. 17:59, 31 March 2009 +warning? why did you warn me? for what? im war with ultra-christians ultra-racist and other jerks, warn me for what?Contributions/62.248.42.19 +REDIRECT Talk:LPG (Dutch band) +Gay Hatred Ah I see you are a homophobe just like Joakim Noah. Maybe one day people can live in peace but until then we just have to put up with people like you. +, LOCK STOCK AND BARREL +" O no no no. It happened by fluke. I was just trying a combination and the statement showed up. It's never easy to extract information from Snippets. The reason being they do not give the full context. Should be used only when you are 100% sure of the fact. Example was the statistics of Goan Catholics in Bombay. Approximations not allowed. TC " +"::All of my points go to arguing about the validity of sources and claims. My responses follow: It is not clear to me in any way how this 38-66% reduction is calculated. Can you please clarify? According to the definition of Randomised Controlled Trial, the RCTs here do not qualify. I have provided numerous reliable secondary sources showing why this is true. Please show me how my claims about statistical insignificance are incorrect. Wikipedia states that news sources are OK. It is not up to you to say that the source is not reliable: Wikipedia's policies dictate that. If you can say that the bogus RCTs and meta-studies are reliable, then the news sources are in too! You can't have your cake and eat it too. Please go back and read my bullet points. I never mentioned that the e-letters were a source. My words were ""see citations"". All I see here are straw man arguments. Please justify your claims with sources. I have provided numerous sources above. " +Deletion review Please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Exicornt. I think WP:DRV is the right place to discuss this slang term. , Thursday May 25 2006 at 14:04 +The hexagonal lattice shown is correct. If i understand you correcty, you are thinking of a Hexagonally Close packed lattice is not a bravais lattice (see Glaser, Group theory for Solid State Scientists) +Well, I'm no fan of Catholicism, but I think your reasoning may be erroneous. You need to identify what it is about the Catholic meme (or memes) which is problematic. Because Catholicism has been so powerful, it has commited many of the greatest evils. But many of these are likely to have been caused by politics, rather than Catholicism per se. And really, it's ridiculous to blame the RCC for Nazism, unless you can show that the church had a determinative role in creating the conditions that allowed it flourish. +You're point? I'm not looking for your silly history lessons, I'm just saying the majority call it Derry since Derry has a Nationalist majority since about the seventies thanks to a few controversial (Bloody Sunday) British acts. Sorry for the off-topic patronising, I just couldn't resist. +"I nominated Every Man for Himself (Lost) for the GA, take a look and see if the article is in a passable shape. Also, I'll later expand reception on ""I Do (Lost)"" to put that one up too. ≠ " +who removed indo aryan origion of jats,and there is also not much written about their culture like their folk dance bhangra,their game kabbadi,hocky,their food etc. i also request the removal of the picture jats in the vincity of delhi as it only shows some villagers not jats!and there are 6 pictures from one book it looks as online version of the book we need some more reliable and good pictures. more info about sikh states we need to write more about sikh states and emperors as maharaja ranjit singhs army was the only army in the history of the whole world who defeated the brave pathans who were more in number and jats were very less but they still defeated them.and some british scholars claimed that if hari singh nalwa general of ranjits army had lived longer and had the sources and artillery of british,he would have conqured most of asia and europe. and i dont know what it means by not well established castes in india,as at that time india was divided into many different small and big princely states and regions jats were well established in punjab,there is no one caste that can be dominant in whole of india it differs from region to region.( ) +Task force Science fiction for wiki project novels I need to know what you know the most about Science Fiction and what interests you have in science fiction. so that I know what to assign you. Please answer on my Talk Page. +" It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of .Please refer to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Braaad for evidence. See [ block log] " +write about the mathematical ideas and +Ford's assessment of fellow presidents released == Just an interesting piece here. They're certainly very enlightening views and may work as an addition to this article in some form. Thoughts? AWF == +My Picture Dude! What the hell happend to my picture? +Well, my arbitration request was deleted. User Jayjg (his edit history is replete with pro-Israel wikipedia censorship) deemed the addition of Nisman's religion racist and banned me. Further, user Thatcher131 deemed that since I had been banned, I would not be given an arbitration request, even though the arbitration request. So now it is impossible to even get a hearing on whether this information should be included. This whole affair is really beyond sad and is an indication that pro-Israeli censors are not interested in truth, but are rather interested in imposing their will. Having now dealt with you first hand, I am no longer confused as to why most of the civilized world holds a negative view of Israel and Israelis. May fate continue to justly bring misery to your oppressive lives. +Please fuck off, your leftist PC nonsense is apparent.174.88.155.12 +" If you cannot tolerate or become patient about a counter thought what can I say more?!! You even qualify the ""Decision of European Court of Human Rights in 17.12.2013"" as a ""Defamatory Content"" in my talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:212.174.38.3). Do you really believe what you say? Is the ""Decision of European Court of Human Rights in 17.12.2013 on 1915 Events"" a ""Defamatory Content"" according to you? If so, then, what is not a defamatory content? 212.174.38.3 " +Abortion lede Please take a look at the abortion lede.71.3.237.145 +" They used ""Lufthansa"" since 1933, in the 1920-1930s History section first paragraph. " +The 800 Club|800]] 04:25, 26 February 2007 +" reference needed for the paragraph you added You added something about ""shannon's formula"" (sic) in the Double-slit_experiment article. Please give a citation or link to take the reader to substantiation for this claim. " +PLEASE NOTE As the original author of a significant portion of this article, I am removing my content. I do not support Wikipedia due to a disagreement with its draconian policies and no longer wish my original text to be featured on a public site. Please have the courtesy to respect the wishes of the original author. If you wish to expand and rewrite the article, please do so using your own text. Thank you. +hahaha jerome bailey has a little willy, and i had sex with his girlfriend.......twice...in ten minutes!!!! +wow dude... you're a real douche. wow. +It doesn't matter. Just give up. Ferrylodge wins and I am leaving the project. There will only be disputes with every other editor. +As you can see, I removed this statement out of the definition, also because it made the definition unnecessarily wordy. +" Obviously, I know they don't all follow the same rules, but the rules they both follow, the follow equally. Yes, the lead section should clarify what a list includes, but a lead section of a regular article should also clarify what is included in the rest of that. I didn't mean that lists and articles are exactly the same and should be treated the same, but with regards to the Lead, it must do the same thing. For a list of US presidents, I believe you have to say what the US president is, not necessarily his constitutional duties, but what it means to be President, what the position is, to provide context for the reader. I would also say how many there have been, who was the first, and who is the current. I may also include other information, such as how long a person is President for (a term of four years) and then maybe say who has held consecutive terms, who has held office more than once (separately), who has died while in office. An overview of the presidents, not what the president does. That's just off the top of my very head, at 2.30am, mind you. No, plot summaries should not be included in a list of episodes (unless there are no season articles). FYI, I have written 8 episodic Featured lists (List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes and each season of that series) and 3 other Featured lists (Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office, List of Scripps National Spelling Bee champions and List of Blue Peter presenters, as well as two Featured articles related to TV series (Degrassi: The Next Generation and Mother and Child Reunion), as well as the Leads for the FLC List of 7th Heaven episodes and former FL List of The Sopranos episodes. While I may not be expressing myself as well as I might at 10am, I do know the different between a list and an article, and am not suggesting that any old information is stuck in there to bulk it out, but also, a little more than simply ""Avatar: The Last Airbender is a 61-episode Emmy award-winning American animated television series written and created by Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko. It aired from February, 2005 to July, 2008."" I would say how many seasons, whether the episodes have been released on DVD, or any other new media outlets such as iTunes or something. I wouldn't include the current second paragraph, though.  (talk • contribs • email) " +Okay thank you very much, I'll adjust the borders. +":::The choice of license template doesn't really matter so long as you have a license for both the photo and the depicted artwork (which you do). The only thing you need is a use rationale for the statue, which you can do with . hi! " +"Still waiting on an answer from a ""good editor."" " +(in fact, see above) +Yes agreed. And it's been removed. It truly had no place in the article. Those were the opinions of one person alone. The show was highly regarded throughout Europe. A look at the comments at Amazon and YouTube prove this. You might as well call Baywatch 'terrible' - or for that matter all the typical tripe emanating from the US television market. The author clearly suffered from a case of NPOV. +Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. | talk +F YOURSELF WITH YOUR FAMILY +A cool kid. Who is cool, 3 +El C, can you please re change the article, i did not revert it the last time but only put the vandalized parts back to the article i guess youre not following the talk page and youre unaware of what is happening there.. +" First, and most importantly, a good number of those listed IP addresses are not mine - which Arcayne fully knows as he has been told that before. Arcayne has run three separate checkusers on me - and I have never acted as a sock. He has followed me to several articles and harassed me, I presented those diffs as well as specific diffs as you requested showing him attacking other editors by calling people ""assclowns"" - apparently, my responding to your specific request was of no interest to you. It appears my crime is that I am a public editor with a dynamic IP. Not much more I can say...75.49.223.52 " +" As of February 2007 in fact just produces importScript('User:Dr pda/prosesizebytes.js'); // " +" members would be fine in that context. Volunteer or Volunteers would be used when specifically referring to individuals but it is of to the ""the three were members of the PIRA"" if you are describing them in general terms. " +And it does. It talks about the attacks he's notable for orchestrating. Whether they're terrorist or not is not for Wikipedia to decide. '''''' +Network neutrality The TBL excerpt is on youtube video, which appears to be cut from the savetheinternet video. They wouldn't care at all. I claim this is fair use, and we are simply linking to a report on what TBL has said. I would imagine we would also have immense protection from Google itself- it's in their business interests to ensure that that video stay up on the web. It's so ridiculously unlikely that the wikipedia could get into any trouble over this link. +Comeuppance You are going to get yours, mark my words! 188.221.144.7 +Legal threats Someone editing from this IP address (and claiming to be J.D. Salinger), made this legal threat. The consensus is the threat was nonsense. In the event this truly is J.D. Salinger, please look at Wikipedia:No legal threats. That policy indicates legal threats should be directed to the foundation. If the threat is serious, please direct it to them and don't post it on site, as it harms the free editing environment we try to create. - T +" Science humour I just wrote the page Science humour. The final section is ""Humour in science fiction"". I mentioned Adams, Asimov, etc. Could you please head over, and help develop the article? I've already mentioned Man of steel, woman of kleenex. Anthing else that would fit into the page? Cheers, " +I've been blocked yet again, Yai, for me, so tell me what wikipedadia lozer blocked me this time? Do you know what I'm complaining about? Of course you do not. You're just an asshole, ) +For an early example, see: Horne, Thomas Hartwell, An introduction to the critical study and knowledge of the Holy Scriptures, Volume 2, T. Cadell, 1828, pp 523-525 +Antonescu was up set with jews because his wife, a jewish woman, did not make him good meals. +Georges-Henri Pingusson Hi, thanks for that. Do you have a ref for your edit? +i think this page should have more detail as there is not enough information about it +. and how come my comment doesn't have its own edit link huh? Like Reg Rarnell. It's like I'm geting kicked in the face by use guys and I don't even get my own edit? And how come I can't have a wiki article about me? Huh, I mean come on Hitler has a wiki page but I don't? Sure doesn't sound right to me +" Response to Your defence of LGagnon. Please check appropriate, relevant and significant details before you post messages to the contrary at my User Page. That should be a basic minimum for any Administrator, I should think. At the Ayn Rand Talk Page you will find evidence of my attempts to talk to Lgagnon. Just infra I post here a copy of my Memo to the Wikipedia Board articulating my frustration in this regard. Sir(s)/Madam(Mesdames): I continue to have problems with LGagnon at Wikipedia. He sends me the most ill-written messages. It is almost impossible to wade through the bad grammar, misspellings/typos; etc to get his point. He indulges the most foul personal attacks with regard to everyone, even Wikipedia admins, referring to the latter as ""vandal-coddling."" He never backs up his unthinking assertions. He simply asserts. Why does Wikipedia continue to indulge one but one lamentably under-educated vulgarian in this regard, to this degree? What could possibly be the explanation????!!!!!!!! Please, Please, Please respond. I have tried to reason with the lad. I tried humour. I have issued warning after warning. He is as osmotically impervious to the ratiocinative as he is to any other recognizably human mode of intervention. Anthony Oluwatoyin (Wikipedia user name: AOluwatoyin). AOluwatoyin" +The quote is from a blog, which is not a reliable source. If you can't find an exact quotation then you should not include the quote. I don't see the use in tagging a quotation with{{Verify credibility}} (or similar) when we've already established that we don't have a reliable source for the quote. As for the section itself, if the information is specifically pertinent to Meles Zenawi then it needs to be rewritten. As it currently reads, though, it is out-of-place in this article. (talk) +" Gordian Knot Hi, I notice you reverted my edit to ""Gordian Knot"". Just for future reference, ""p."" is the abbreviation for ""page""; ""pp."" is the standard abbreviation for ""pages"" (always plural) when used for a range of pages in a book. It's never used just for one page. 131.111.128.77 " +"Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. - (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) " +Furthermore, I will NOT respond again to an individual who doesn't have the spine to put his own full name to his words, especially when they are a barrage of profanity and verbal abuse (with no substance of argument). Sign your name or give it a rest. +Oh noes, you found out my provider is telenet. Well, fuck you. Is this supposed to intimidate me? +That may be of interest in an article about the National Alliance, but it seems of no interest to an article about Betty Crocker, since the National Alliance is of no interest to General Mills, as far as I can see. 03:06, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC) +" For the moment I'll leave it at that: You cut out the ""undo"" option (right at the bottom, the last edit on 18th of march, 2012) and the picture was deleted with this edit. Since I pointed it out you obviously ""changed"" the version history and blamed Brian Boulton for doing it - instead of taking responsibility for yourself http://www.upload-pictures.de/bild.php/37124,verstossruhrfisch8KRMW.jpg In comparison, the version history after another ""intervention"" by the user ""Ruhrfisch"" , to cover his tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Falcon_Scott&offset;=20120423141643&action;=history ........... " +I imagine that planar images are easier to scroll because you can simply apply a rotate operation on the screen data, and that will scroll the screen by x pixels horizontally. I believe that this operation is free using the Amiga's clever chipset. +Holmes apparently your an idiot. The Book you imbecile iS TANAKH. You have to buy the information you little utopian putz. It is verifiable if you lift your chubby little finger and go click and purchase. http://www.jewishpub.org/product.php?id=139 YOU JUST HAVE TO PAY FOR IT FOOL! It's NOT FREE! And moreover its more elaborate indepth and actually in hebrew. The Source you reference here is it not? Well that internation idiots version of garbage, ain't hebrew. Go flex your muscles elsewhere my point is made. And will resound for a while now, from here out. +He always is. | talk +Alansoh, you are a real jackass with no life. stop screwing around with my changes, because they are all true! +You must have a lot of kleenex by your computer for all the crying you do you baby! Grow up and get a life! +" A number of conquest attempts were launched against Prussia by Poland, (ref External link William Pierson book), also ] Chronicon Polonor. Ongoing military attacks in order to subjugate Prussia. Labuda disputes this. Marija Gimbutas in her book: The Balts - describes the Prussian and Baltic territory reaching much further west, south, south-west, south-east than the later Prussia, when Poland came into existense and conquered much additional territory (claimed by Polish to have been a ""uniting of Polish tribes""), however for centuries rejected and fought against by the ones involved. Prussians are also recorded as Ulmerugi, Holmrugi (Island Rugians in the Vistula river area. That name still showed up on maps of area around Culm, Culmerland, Kulmerland territory which was surrounded by the Vistula river. Boleslaw I claimed to have conquered (part of) the Prussians and even his headstone is supposed to have shown something like this. He also claimed to have put 'columns' (pillars) up in the newly conquered Prussian territory, to mark the new border of territory, which he now claimed as his, which was not his. So ,Szopen, Culmerland was not Polish land- it was Prussian land, partially conquered temporarily by Poland. Gethen, Getae is yet another name for the Prussians, that name was still known to Polish historians as well. Szopen's mentioning of Bruno of Querfurt as having taken part in Boleslaw I battles against Prussians 1015 also makes no sense, because Bruno was dead since 1009." +" Date of death In point of fact, no reputable outlet is saying absolutely that he died on Sunday, Feb. 2, because there's no way yet to know that. He was found on that day, but he may very have died on Saturday, Feb. 1, before midnight. (He was seen alive around 7 p.m. that evening, so he didn't die before then.) We can only truthfully say ""Feb. 2014"" or ""Feb. 1 or 2, 2014."" Before any edit-wars start, is there any definitive, concrete evidence that he definitely, absolutely died on Sunday and not late Saturday night? " +TYLER COMBS Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page TYLER COMBS. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) +Not after, smartass. In case you forgot, I was here way before the hardrock-idiot started his stupid webbased forum. +The CTV article was not minor. I remember when they broadcast it - in fact at the time I didn't even know Susan Kadis was involved. As I recall it got into at least 2 different major newscasts or newspapers. It was the important news of the day, was broadcast all over the country on CTV's evening news. Sure it may have been forgotten 2 days later, but so are most news reports. And according to google, Susan Kadis has not been mentioned in any other major articles since then, except the Michael Ignatieff issue. The few times Susan Kadis receives national press coverage should warrant inclusion in her encyclopedia article, not the sensing and cindering that's been going on. +" Comment intended for Schlafly page I received a 7-day block for my previous comments, and now an indefinite block. Here is a comment that I intended for the Schlafly talk page. I believe that the Phyllis Schlafly article falsely maligns Schlafly by misinterpreting a NY Times book review. The article implies that Schlafly opposed Nixon over ""segregation and discrimination"", while the source only says that she was with conservatives who were going to oppose whatever Rockefeller proposed. The article relies on a Jewish NY Times columnist raising a Jewish issue, without mentioning that the columnist is a Jew who writes about Jewish issues, and that no one else raises this Jewish issue. The article implies that Schlafly used Jewish code words, while the source does not explicitly say so. All the source really says is that her opinion is that the biography should have commented on the matter further. The WP BLP policy requires that these false allegations be removed. " +Racism Please explain your (seemingly racist, highly ignorant) comments on the Maltese nobility talkpage. If it was a moment of madness, or you're going through a particularly difficult time, I think now's the time to say so. Otherwise, I find it difficult to understand how such an attitude can be justified. Thank you. +"== Your report of vandalism == Thank you for posting at Wikipedia talk:Questions, but the proper place to ask questions is our help desk. With regard to vandalism, normally this is quickly fixed - the best thing to do, if you do not know how to fix it properly, is probably to come back to the article in five or ten minutes and see if the vandalism is gone. If not, then you should report the problem at the help desk. (♫♫) " +In other words, you seem to have written the articles as though they were non-fiction topics taken from some fictional encyclopedia, whereas they really should read like fiction topics in a non-fictional encyclopedia (Wikipedia). +Iron Sheik clip This clip is very important, I find it insulting that you would give me a warning message for creating a legitimate page. +Where Serb nationalism? How? When? Why? I already explained to You his block log. ) I repeat, it's highly uncivil to accuse Wikipedians like that, with absolutely no evidence (please read WP:Civil). Please understand.... comment the content, not the user (as wiki says). +I didn't actually think I'd actually put anything IN -but OK. What I do suggest watching out for is stuff like linking to threads on the website, then making claims based on that. (moved from my talk) +" Go ahead, take it. If you deserve the credit, take whatever credit you need. I won't stop you. 32 " +" 1957 | Despite being born in Argentina, Alfredo Di Stéfano acquired Spanish citizenship in 1956, and went on to play for the Spanish national football team. | Real Madrid | style=""text-align: center"" | 72 | | Wolverhampton Wanderers | style=""text-align: center"" | 19 | | Manchester United Real Madrid | style=""text-align: center"" | 16" +Ah, there seems to have been some misreading on my part. I interpreted 'good film articles' to be asking for *good films* whose articles included equivalent sections, as distinct from *good articles* on films that included such sections. My apologies. (talk | contribs) +Username sounds like an organization Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Severncom, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it It sounds like a role account for http://www.severncom.com/ which we don't allow. You should take the time to read WP:COI and WP:ADVERT. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. as you seem to be here to constructively contribute and we'd hate for you to have an unpleasant experience like finding yourself blocked from editing. Best regards, +betacommandbot not notifying contributor betacommandbot recently marked Image:Franklin Road Academy.png as not having fair use rationale (which was correct, i had forgotten to do so, so thank you) however, it never notified me of the marking of my image as without fair use rationale. You should fix your bot so that it notifies the uploader that their content has been marked. Thank you. +Lofat Hi Saposcat, adviced to ask you. There is an urban legend in Hungary about the etymology of a word: Lófasz. That's pretty rude, it means horse's dick. The legend - which may be true - says that it comes from an old Turkish word, Lofat, which was a torturing device back in the 15th-16th century. It's a long stake or pole used for impalement. See picture here. As the picture shows there was such a device, but I have no sources if it was called lofat. Could you please tell me if that or a very similar turkish word existed in the middle ages? Thank you! Best regards +" Hey, don't worry too much, people who actually understand WP policy like relevance, COPYVIO, RS, UNDUE, etc. consistently removed the material and, as you can see above, are trying to get a more encyclopaedic-toned version in place. Parley! " +Now I know I should stay away from Silent Hill pages since they are on your watch lists. +" Speedy deletion of Non-californian sfety administration Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +somewere unknown 68.191.101.192 is saying YOU HAVENT SEEN THE LAST OF ME AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH +Dead link bot Hi, I read on the dead external links page you were programming a dead link bot as am I. I'm not sure how far along your are with you programming and maybe we can prevent duplication of work? I have a running demo if you care to take a look. — +" Grades of ABUs I don't really know how to cite the information that I just put in about the grades. I found out this info because I am in the Air Force and went to a vendor show today. A rep from ""Dakota Outerwear Company"", which is a authorized vendor of ABUs, showed to me and explained the four grades of ABUs. The different in the colors are very slight and hard for even me to tell (a color blind person might have problems). The difference comes from the fact that the Air Force wanted to lower costs so they used the dyes longer which means that the first batch dipped in the dyes is darker than the 30th batch dipped in the same dyes. Therefore making different quality grades. Oh and btw they only come in winter wieght. That is the only source I can give you on that information. Believe it or not.. I got it from the camels mouth and seen and touched it. Keith" +Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Klaus Welle. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +Done. There's still a lot of other ones out there to convert. It's going to be a long job. +Disappearing Delete my user page and purge the history. +Thanks for the heads up, . That talk page is busy enough without archive sizing discussions, so I intend to not discuss it further on the article talk page. +Alright, I'll set it up myself. Anonymiss Madchen +Unblock We don't understand. Please help. +Impact on Global Weather Patterns This sounds like a bit of a stupid question, but presumably if we start using a lot of wind energy, then we are slowing down the movement and circulation of air in the atmosphere. How are we able to determine what the long term impact of this is? Recall that people expressing concerns about polluting the air and causing climate change were ridiculed when first proposed. How do we know that broad-based use of wind-based power generation won't have dire long-term consequences? (Those consequences to seem like they would be rapidly reversible, however.) Presumably a similar argument could be made about geothermal exhausting the heat within the Earth, causing the tectonic action to cease, but that seems a lot further off than wind-based power generation having an impact. 194.59.184.12 +" The principle ""if a source does not mention Langan it should not be in the article"" sounds commendable, but if applied to every WP:BLP article it would eliminate hundreds of relevant statements from articles. If, for example, someone claims to have this or that IQ score, that opens the door to mainstream reliable secondary sources about the interpretation of IQ scores. (talk, ) " +" Is OhInternet a recreation of Encyclopedia Dramatica? To tangent from the above topics… Oh Internet is not Encyopedia Dramatica as the article supposes. 'Encyclopedia Dramatica' is defined as the domain name 'www.encyclopediadramatica.com' and the intellectual property concerned with ED copyright. OhInternet, however is a different project entirely; notable differences: a new XML coding system, logo and form of satire. To use terms in the article: the site was not 'overhauled' but rather 'replaced'. To use Silverseren's analogy, if Wikipedia did rename itself, kept most of its higher administration and stopped using Wikimedia software would it still be Wikipedia? The answer is ""No"". The Wikipedia name and intellectual property becomes inactive, lost. If one were to charge a Wikipedia fork site with copyright violations they would have to give evidence of their ownership of Wikipedia copyright and not that of the new 'OhKnowledge.com', the hypothetical Wikipedia replacement. (Sherrod, however does have evidence, so don't take this as a justification for the .ch). Once a site loses connection with the old name or any registered associated material it ceases to be the same entity. Oh Internet has no parallels to the old site at all. The position that the new site is ED just 'cleaned' should be removed from the article immediately. Encyclopedia Dramatica, as defined, is dead. OhInternet is a whole new project – a de facto successor, but not 'ED'. The redirect was an attempt to maintain website hits but as many 3rd party websites will show, it didn't quite work out. The vast majority of the volunteer editors did leave. Site activity, growth and edit numbers are much higher at encyopediadramaticia.ch than at OhInternet. OhInternet’s declining popularity should first stabilize before any 'notability' assessment goes underway. Understandably the nature of ED.ch is illegal so I don't care for it immediate coverage. I like to think the site will cool down over time. 94.170.94.249 " +In the first stage of the British plan, both divisions were to occupy the higher ground either side of Willow Stream and Mametz on the right, then take Fricourt in the next stage, then move through the first German intermediate position and to the second intermediate position across the valley fronting Mametz Wood, with the right in contact with the XIII Corps at White Trench and the left linked with III Corps at Quadrangle Trench below Contalmaison. The objective was chosen as a place from which it would be possible to receive a counter-attack, with good artillery observation and to have dead ground, from which the artillery could begin a bombardment of the German second position. If the German defence collapsed, the 17th Division in corps reserve would pass beyond and advance through Mametz Wood, up the north side of Caterpillar Valley, to Bazentin le Grand, Longueval and Ginchy. Fricourt was not to be attacked frontally but isolated, for which the right hand brigade of the 7th Division was to take Mameta and then White Trench, the centre brigade was to form a defensive flank facing Fricourt and the wood, on the south rise of Willow Valley and the inner brigades of the 7th Division and 21st Division, were to wait in the front-line trenches opposite the village, until ordered forward by the corps commander. +Personally I'm not as it really seems like we're portraying Donohue's characterizations as valid. Give Donohue (which essentially is the Catholic League) credit as he is a seasoned p.r. and talk show veteran and seems to know what hot buttons to push and how. However if we are going to give him a platform I would feel better if we broke down the section into the major points with balancing statements so the readers can easily see the issues dissected and addressed. To me the section feels like a several-headed beast each adding a sentence onto the next with the net result of confusion. I suggest sections including one devoted to just the League's issues (if it's just them) so we don't infer because the League said X then Y happened. In my opinion Donohue speaks as if he's representing Catholics and is actually seen by many Catholics as an extremist (I'm not sure if right-wing is accurate) who's actually feeding anti-Catholicism by perpetuating stereotypes in pop culture arenas while ignoring concerns of mainstream Catholics. I may not be wording this in the best way but I think the gist is there. Benjiboi +No worries, I actually copy-edited two articles, but it seems when I added link on the blitz page, I added a typo so it didn't link across. Anyway, have a good day. Regards, +Sorry to hear this -) I think, however, there are hundreds of novels where Székelys are mentioned and this one is not the most important of them. +" I removed the suspect paragraph: A little known early fact about Pasadena is the presence of a ship's mascot in the form of a North American snapping turtle. The animal was kept by the crew during construction at Electric Boat, and was even aboard during her launching into the Thames River. Immediately prior to commissioning, the turtle, named Frumpy, was donated to California Polytechnic University in Pasadena, CA. Pasadena was launched into the Thames because she was built at Electric Boat on the Thames. That makes sense. ""California Polytechnic University in Pasadena,"" on the other hand, makes no sense. " +Minor typo correction to Doc Savage's remark -SIGNED Jack Horner +"IN RESPONSE TO THE GENETICS OF KURDS AND JEWS== I would like to point something out. There are genetic similarities between certain Jewish groups and Iranian peoples that is because those people are Iranian Jews, either Tats, or Persian Jews or Kurdish Jews. Jewish people are not an ethnic group they are a faith or religious group. There are Negroid Jews from Africa and Dravidian Jews from southern India. One of the largest populations to have Jews is that of the Iranian peoples. In fact the state of Iran has the second largest Jewish population in the Middle East after Israel. The similarity of these people, Jews and Kurds in particular is due to shared Iranian genes among a few other minor ones. There is an article about Kurdish Jews and Persian Jews. It is called the ""Children of Queen Ester."" Ester was the Empress of Queen of Iran and wife of Emperor Xerxes who fought the Athenians and Spartans in what classical scholars refer to as the Persian Wars. A large portion of Israelis are Iranian Jews like Israel's head of state, Moshe Katsav http://www.knesset.gov.il/president/epres_page.htm who is from Yazd, Iran and the current Israeli defence minister. The genetic similarities that are greatest between Kurds and Jews are with the group of Jews that are Iranian or also what is termed 'Iranic' origin such as Persian Jews and Kurdish Jews or Tats. One will find that Jews that are from Arabic countries are very similar to Arabs and that Jews from Europe are very similar genetically to the Europeans. Mind you there is in most Jews a hint or trace of that unique Hebrew gene of their Semitic ancestors, but it is not the dominant genetic make up. The genes of the nations the Jews settled in are what are dominant in their genetic makeup. A Russian Jew is ethnically a Russian while an Iranian Jew is ethnically an Iranian. European Jews are in fact not Semitic, as opposed to Arab Jews who are Semitic. Semitic peoples are tanned and dark haired people, while many European Jews are fair and resemble the native European population. I hope you follow. Genetically and hereditarily the closes people to the Kurds are the Lur and Bakhtari, which are both Iranian peoples, followed by the Persians. The article that is basically claiming that Kurds are closer to Jewish populations than Iranians is incoherent and should be deleted because it is taken out of context and is from a non-primary and constricted source that has been widely disagreed with by the scientific community. ==" +I started a column but we need to go through all those links to verify references. Formatting can be done at same time. +Much of the basic biographical information concerning Barungi is not readily available. I have contacted FEMRITE members who also did not know, and informed me that Violet Barungi does not provide the same even on her own web site. So this article is meant as stub and a starter nothing more. +No - as RFC initiator. The section was a full 3/4ths of the article, which greatly violates WP:UNDUE, and the section was very poorly sourced, and even contained a lot of unsourced negative statements. A section about the event in 2008 should be included, but this company has a long history and a single event does not define it. - ✉ +" Addition of information I thought I would bring this up on the discussion page since there has been more than one revert. this addition to the article is something I feel to be problematic. While it may be titillating to an adolescent male (or rather anyone, including myself) it is not what one would typically see in a serious biographical entry. It would also need reliable sources, as we shouldn't have a single fact in a biography, or any article really, that is not backed by an accountable source. Several actors have been involved in nudity and simulated sex scenes, so this does not seem to be notable, nor is it which sources deem to make this particular actor to be noteworthy. talk " +Since the allegation of the rape was originally denied by the nun before the Police; and subsequently complained longer afterwards only on the doctor's reporting the semen, and since this info is sourced from PTI, mention of the Report should be made. However, if suppressing it in this Page would help more foreign donations, I am agreeable to suppressing it. The more the rapes, the more the dollars, as you know. Anyway, the Church has hidden the nun now. I feel she might not re-appear again except to claim the compensation. +" As Fences says, you need an admin to restore those articles, of which I am not (I already said that above). Good day to you, sir, and good luck. We are done here.<> " +I know it's almost a year after the fact...but the fact is most banks do that. Happened to me when I was at another bank. +" Hello Rick Hope all is well. I notice you've been editing occasionally, but the bot hasn't been updating LOA (admin list). Is everything ok with the bot? '''' message'' " +©DanielAustin, author +hey dead set Fuck Head +Sir, there was more than consensus (other Anti-Rubashkin editors seemed to have conceded that he was not CEO), there was clear evidence that you nor your cohort have responded to, what motivated you to change it? Oh, and I like the latest trick up your sleeve, we will see how far it goes. +" Yes , that's why I left the diff here to show that the section considered SYNTHESIS and OR by , that similar position by me has been ""explicitly rejected"" by you and 2 other editors. " +Obama and Joe the Plumber Why does it seem like you love to inject your liberal trash into these 2 articles then revert anything that is remotley RW? Seems like your pushing a non NPOV to me. 71.57.146.112 +" conference presentation This article seems to rely very strongly on ""Benson, John PhD (2004). ""Emplacing Our Lives: Executive Study"" Presentation at the FIGT 2004 Conference. Retrieved 3 December 2006."" or rather an explanation of what was said at the presentation. To my mind, this single web page explanation is being given far too much weight in this article. Comments? " +" Hey random dude guy who added the Leben info. I agree that it was hilarious and maybe even factually relevant but your tone and wording was incredibly biased. WP is not an entertainment mag, I think if you avoided phrases like ""made [Leben] break down and cry"" then your addition would work. But for now I've reverted it. " +jiiiiiiiiiiles= leave jiles alone, or your nout but a racist +And there you go again, tell me the most important person on Wikipedia so I may complain, how can my article not meet the policy, when i hadn't finished writing! The ATROSITY! +Pft, don't be THAT hard on yourself. Kudos to you for getting the extra input rather than just acting. People could stand to learn from you. Hell, I could stand to learn from you on that note. talk +You have always been a model for good conduct in my recollection. My capacity involved a more in-your-face attitude to other editors who were not aware of the inner workings and prior histories. I was relieved when Wales removed Mccoy's bio, as that was alway's Mccoy's wishes, my experience with McCoy is that he always had multi-conflicting interests due to his PTSD. The inability to get others who were concerned with their own contributions and not McCoy's wishes got me banned - several times! LOL! All I'm asking is that you verify that Wales removed McCoy's bio in the recent past and that should help to eliminate the expansion of McCoy's bio from eating up the Whitman article. (Barring ego's and information right activists.) My apologies for any past infringments! Thanks! 98.94.163.97 +Son, this is not the correct talk page for that, and also it is not an attack page- it is a well cited mention of a documentary film in the works. +If you look here in my dicussion page, there is not one single warning given to me by any administrator. But you clearly see that my ethnic and religion is stated in the top. This could mean that somebody don't like my ethnic or my religion and use this as a way to punish me harsher than other Users who keep their ethnics and religion secret. I always proudly state my ethnic and religion, and everyone else may do the same without any fear. +Crash! Another movie from left field. i have to ask, why did Star Wars: Episode III even got nominated. People go to see movies like those , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:30 +" Also, unlike Hod Lipson's bigoted crazy comments on how ""legal immigrants doing all the work"" (meaning dirty work as he had referred to) you, Feitas, Merkle Roco (who RUNS the ENTIRE nano department at NSF and he's an X communist scientist!) are taking our GOOD jobs, in fact STEALING THEM as they were stolen from me and as they are stealing the Collins patent. " +Please help me get a life. +No dumbF-CK, YOU quit your disruptive editing Bernie sanders is divorced. Quit CENSORING that out of his article. And, for goodness sake, learn to use Google and don't knee jerk delete anything about the man you don't like.162.216.14.26 +Hi, I have reported you to the admins. Feel free to voice your opinion over there. +You have been blocked from editing +yi sun shin actually won da battle.da guy hu dinks dat da japanese won is a noob.user:dark-hooded smoker +Man, how come the violence and vandalism thing dont have no citation, then and it is all pretty much the same when you read all the stories about his past and [here|http://www.markwahlbergfan.com/article_vanityfair.htm] is a good souce for all that +You can't comment on how much has been removed endless you know what and why. +an encylopedia for fun - and the free dissemination of misinformation - that's how i and so many others view it. +Excellent! No prize, but we do get this banner on our talk pages. – +Good points. And even with these it can be covered well in subsection form at Indophobia, hence the merger proposal. +It's because it is 2 different probations, Ben. General probation is to stop general disruptive edits. So if there is a pattern of edits that 3 admins say are disruptive, you can be banned for short periods. The other one is less severe. It only blocks you from any particular article that you are being disruptive at. So there are 2 different probations. (cat scratches) +Errorchive Oh WHOOPS!...gawd knows what I thought I was doing, thanks for drawing my attention to it. +" I'm not married to that cite. I'm fine with finding a better one-however we don't need to get so hung over ""going too far"" because the parts that you say have ""gone too far"" aren't going into the article anyway. (We're not quoting her). However any cite used there must directly, explicitly, associate ex nihilo to the Genesis account. Given the degree to which this has been a subject of dispute, I'm not being pedantic about this distinction. To move past this we need a good citation and the reference used has to directly verify the claim. That's not negotiable. The no original research policy is quite clear that you can't source a single claim by joining pieces of it from two different references to construct an argument for it. Find one good, solid and authoritative source that says it, that explicitly identifies it as a widely accepted interpretation of genesis, and we can move on. Two would be great. " +" To revert an article back to a prior version, go to ""History"" and find the version of the article you want. Go to it. At the top, hit ""Edit"" or ""Edit this page"" depending on how far you've customized your tools, and it will say ""Your are editing a prior version of this article"" or something of that sort. By pressing ""save"" you are reverting the article back to this version. For the Youth Noise article, I'm a bit confused. You moved the old Youth Noise article to some other place and worked on it there, someone restarted the Youth Noise article, and now you want to move your article back to Youth Noise? If so... i'll be right back with the answer as soon as you say yes ). ||| Contribs " +11:04, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) +Don't threaten me. I made minor edits on one user's page after he told me to F___ off. Leave it alone; it does not concern you and it is over anyway. +It wasn't added by consensus, it was added by the actual vandal who spent about an hour repeat vandalizing the article, before adding it to BJAODN +April 2008 Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. +" anti-semitic Why do you people always have to label people ""anti-semitic""? If there was a Wiki-article saying negative things about the English or the Africans, they wouldn't be labeled anti-English or anti-African. They'd just be what they are, critiques of the English or critiques of the Africans. What people like you don't get is you justify every criticism about The Tribe." +July 2009 (UTC) There no original in this text. So, with additional references this text should be restored in the paper. 195.47.212.108 06:54, 23 +"The ""Gdansk vote"" - a discussion that took place freakin' fifteen years ago is completely irrelevant. It is not nor ever was policy or even a guideline. The appropriate guideline is Wikipedia's naming convention and manual of style. Did Wikipedia even have infoboxes when the Gdansk discussion took place? If not then how can it possibly apply to that. Did the sources change in the fifteen freakin' years since the Gdansk discussion? If so, then that's an additional reason not to care about it. If you think that you can hide behind the Gdansk vote in order to carry out your edit wars, or to engage in nationalistic POV pushing, that's your prerogative. I very strongly doubt that others will see it the same way. (and btw, you're even misinterpreting the Gdansk vote in these edits). " +" Poorly Written The article is a good description of what is known about ""Merkle's Boner."" Unfortunately, the discussion seems a bit rushed, even for an encyclopedia entry, and the grammar is a bit lacking. I suggest that someone edit the page to make it intelligent. Re: Sensitivity. It is not our problem that current society thinks of a boner as something other than a huge mistake. That is what it was called, back then, and how it is known. Re: Scoring. I agree, big picture, but I also object to using a word like ""drilled"" when a word like ""hit"" would suffice and be better understood. The entry is factually correct, as the facts (disputed) are known. Our point is that the entry is poorly written. I agree." +one more source of the battle of chamkaur http://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/other-historical-places/punjab/chamkaur-sahib i want you to edit this Article +vacation3||start=November 22, 2006|end=November 25, [[2006 +Re: Re: Why did you delete Nirvana? Can you tell me from where was the text copy pasted? i have read all the wiki guidelines and priciples. The nirvana article in no way violates any of those. And for your information, I started the Nirvana school in SVNIT along with my friends. And the content written in my article was done by my batchmates and me. So the content is 100% original. Just like Mindbend, Sparsh and Entru-meet, Nirvana is an essential part of SVNIT. It is a year long celebration of life, love and benevolence at SVNIT. So please add it back. +", especially how it relates to the expression ""briar patch""" +" WP:IR Don't put that on people's talk pages please, it adds them to the article category. I'll whip up one that you can use for advertising later. 303 " +" Or perhaps we should copy the Simple English: ""Heavy metal songs are loud and powerful-sounding, and have strong rhythms that are repeated.""" +" Because 2011 is for internationally notable events. The UK riots belong in 2011 in the United Kingdom. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) " +" Go with what I said the first time. Problem solved. – '''''' Let's Talk! ) " +" From www.earthliberationfront.com: ""The intention of this web site is to inform and chronicle issues related to E.L.F."" Looks relevant to me ... I went ahead and added the link. " +Don't remove speedy-deletion tags You are entitled to challenge the speedy deletion; if you want to do that, put {{hangon}} on the page immediately under the {{db}} tag, and put your reasons on the article's talk page. The administrators will read what you say before they decide. But you should not remove the speedy deletion tag. +News Music Why is news theme information not allowed on the page? It's factual information that is rather important to a station's history. +The only freedom you are defending in this case is the freedom of corporations to use certain images on this site. You're taking away freedom from the vast majority of readers. My guess is that you're a Stallman fanboy, right? It's either that, or you work for the copyright lobby. But it's not just freedom you hate, you also hate our policies on consensus, disruption, and vandalism. You pretend like you own Wikipedia, even though you haven't done a single thing for the site. I think the passages you link to should be removed. Perhaps that would throw an exception in your machine-level logic. Just stick to programming. Philosophy is far more complex than writing a program.69.39.89.95 +Thank you The page will now be deleted by the author. +kwazy kweries Do you purposely antagonize people or is this just a natural state where you don't realize you're doing it? +SkyWalker, Glad to hear that you visit us. Regarding links placements, our time is limited, so we can not really initiate discussions for all games that we need to add a single link to. this appears to be your policy so of course, what could I do here. We were struggling with Wiki for some time and our staff complained about such removals so I went on a journey to see what's it all about. Appearantly I had even worst luck since ALL the links I added were removed. Bottom line, SkyWalker, are you interested in doing such links discussions in order to get our links placed for us, for payment? Would you as well be interested in joining our staff? We are looking for 1 new person. In the past week we found 2 more staff people for the site. So we are really on a look out for new people. I am certain that we deserve to have our links placed there, and it just doesn't make sense to try to since they have 95% of chances to be removed. But Wiki is great source of people and if it takes one person dedicated for doing that, we are willing to give it a try, even for an extra fee. Please let me know. Thank you, +":Which players? It hasn't been changed for a while.   talk  " +Air Warrior Block 3 Is it me or is there two 'Air Warrior Block 3' sections listed next to each other? It's late and I'm tired so somebody that can see straight and knows the subject may wanna check that +Note the control he believes he has over you. Like any IRA man, he believes that others will bow to his tactics of intimidation and fear. I believe that quite literally our lives are in danger until and unless he is expelled from Wikipedia. +Those wondering how Dewani could have been acquitted can get insight in the above quote. The judge admits that she all but ignored the evidence against him. So it's a perversion of an already perverted ruling (itself riddled with contradictions) to characterize it as exonerating Dewani or having claimed there was no credible evidence against him. The judge ruled the evidence fell below the standard for conviction, as the article now says. +" That's a side effect of my signature style. Miszabot doesn't count the date as a number. Yours was the last ""real"" post, over two days ago. (talk) 08:48, October 9, 2015 (UTC)" +Multi-revised comments that break chronological discussion threads ARE A WASTE OF TIME +Sounds interesting. I look forward to seeing it +There’s no need to rush, as they have waited this long. Do whichever one(s) you want whenever you want. But getting back to //: another possibility is to include them into , leaving only a redirect in the original locations. +can you believe that maldives president is david cameron and vice president is ariel sharon? did you see that on wikipedia? )) you need to edit that part. +There's a shorter variation of that. It's right behind this link: +Thanks! And thank you very much for pointing that out! Cheers, Jude. +" |} Kahane was a hero and a martyr who fought for Jewish human rights against the savage Arab aggressor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.57.140 Kahane was a hero and a martyr who fought for Jewish human rights against the savage Arab aggressor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.57.140 " +I can confirm this. Rather than undeleting though it might be more helpful to offer any help he needs in navigating the rapids of image licensing. ( ) +I believe running a PDP-10 (real or simulated) and matching the original programming environment would produce the most accurate representation for the original adventure. I have a simulated PDP-10 running (see my URL above) with session logs on how to set this up. However, the matching old version of the PDP-10 operating system and Fortran compiler Crowther used are unknown and may be lost. A PDP-10 with later OS and Fortran still compiles and runs Crowther's and Crowther's/Wood's code as is, and all print terminal input/output can be logged. Below is Crowther's adventure (see build-adv0.txt) as it would have been printed on a PDP-10's hard copy terminal: .RUN ADV31 WELCOME TO ADVENTURE!! WOULD YOU LIKE INSTRUCTIONS? YES SOMEWHERE NEARBY IS COLOSSAL CAVE, WHERE OTHERS HAVE FOUND FORTUNES IN TREASURE AND GOLD, THOUGH IT IS RUMORED THAT SOME WHO ENTER ARE NEVER SEEN AGAIN. MAGIC IS SAID TO WORK IN THE CAVE. I WILL BE YOUR EYES AND HANDS. DIRECT ME WITH COMMANDS OF 1 OR 2 WORDS. (ERRORS, SUGGESTIONS, COMPLAINTS TO CROWTHER) (IF STUCK TYPE HELP FOR SOME HINTS) YOU ARE STANDING AT THE END OF A ROAD BEFORE A SMALL BRICK BUILDING . AROUND YOU IS A FOREST. A SMALL STREAM FLOWS OUT OF THE BUILDING AND DOWN A GULLY. GO IN YOU ARE INSIDE A BUILDING, A WELL HOUSE FOR A LARGE SPRING. _ The font, and maybe the command to start the adventure program, may differ with the true original hard copy. I think the print out may be the more accurate representation. Since, that was how Crowther wrote and played the game? +that the disputed material stays out of the article until a consensus is actually established to add it. I have no objection to the addition of further content about the controversies if that's the consensus established, but you cannot simply get into a revert war +, and took it adjectivally +" ADDITIONAL: please see the Propaganda article. The sentence ""Another example of America’s attempt with Black Propaganda is that the U.S. paid Iraqis to publish articles written by American troops in their newspapers under the idea that they are unbiased and real accounts; this was brought forth by the New York Times in 2005.[39]"" is clearly UNSUPPORTED BY THE ARTICLE THEY LINK TO. I have run a search on the article linked with both NYT and New York Times and there is no mention anywhere related in that article regarding ""black propaganda"" or the payment of Iraqis to publish ghost-written articles!!!!!!!!!!!" +Authority re Coast Guard attempt to close Sturgeon Point lighthouse and remove the Fresnel lens Google the following: Coast Guard Sturgeon Point decommissioning If one looks at the Alcona County Historical Society, which was on point in collecting the 5000 plus signatures (in a town that has 600 people), you might find more. Additionally, there was (at one time) a public comment section with the Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, where comments were posted protesting the move. Since I've given up editing or contributing to articles, that's the most I'll do. Good luck Stan +Hate to tell you this, dude... ...but you're a subject not a citizen. +- I mean, we have an administrator siding with us! +" MoP, Have you been reading anything I have written? Did you intend to ""sort out a few things"" or was that mainly said for appearances?" +You are Bigot You are a Bigot. +I HATE YOU You just do things anyhow and as you please as if you father owns wikipedia. You just delete articles anyhow also. Dont let me catch u one day else I'll KILL you. Watchout dawg! U just played with FIRE!!! +Waka Flocka Yeah I don't know why you deleted the article about Waka Flocka, you probably just didn't do your research, but he is a rapper (just Google him). Delete-button-crazy admins are so annoying. +The ISO file that I received was 674 MB and the actual programs unpacked were 797 MB. I am also using Microsoft 7 OS and using both the English and French language versions (which are the same in size). +" For the Love of a Daughter This song is too good. I can't even handle it. She is pouring her heart out, and I'm feeling it. First listen: I cried. The truth. Even better than ""Skyscraper"". — {talkcontribs  " +" Thank you The Modest Barnstar Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 " +A Letter to Wikipedia Dear Wikipedia, Why no one want edit this article. This book does exists. Please, I want see changes in this article. Sincerely, ```` +" Awww thats cute Magog but lets get real DS just owned your lame ass you aint got shit on him dude you can never block him now someone else has to do it @Bwilkins TP never reacted actually he just reports it he has been very patient in the past 6 months actually just sad lilly livered admins crap themselves once they encounter a hounder who has a bit of lip on him as for me I will always be ""rulebreaker"" as long as DS and other pov pushers are let free to deface everything on wiki now grow a pair Magog pull that thumb out your mouth and be a man 86.177.11.244 " +My unsourced opinions? There is no citation for him being gay, so what is there to prove that I'm wrong? +Instead of citing a wall of text, why not give examples? +" Notability of Mandy Eyler A tag has been placed on Mandy Eyler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +Comments from Crackthewhip775 Hello, Sir. I wonder how you are feeling during what is likely to be your last few months editing Wikipedia. I would like to have been a fly on the wall during one of your sessions with your priest regarding your contemplated retirement! I will remember you as one of the most engaging figures I have encountered on Wikipedia. Are you a member of SABR - the baseball study group you mention from time to time? I plan to join the organization when I get older and bigger. Do you have any comments - pro or con - about SABR? Happy New Year and Best Wishes. +It is said that Mike Jones can be reached at 661-753-4976 +Very similarly, Serbia defined itself independent from 1869 within its constitution but it took until 1878 for this to be recognised. Bulgaria also achieved the status it desired at the same treaty and this gave the country its full outline including Macedonia and the area of West Thrace (Greece) up to the sea. Then came the turn of events because of western interest and Bulgaria had its wings clipped, we both know the story from that point. I admit I am not one for comprehending the full facts on self-governing entities; I know suzerain existed in contrast to sovereign but am I not right in thinking that suzerain status deemed the region was still subject to another's sovereignty? Or did the term sovereign not apply where suzerain was the case? And if not, what was special about being suzerain? (Евлекис) (argue) +" Hi Methanus, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. " +My bot has ability/approved to run on English Wikipedia only. 116.197.178.83 +Forgot the signature. Sorry. +Support move. To me, the word impact seems more appropriate. (However, I admit that i'm not native english). +" Re: Henry Percy (Hotspur) Hi - looks like you are very quick off the mark! You undid some of my work while I was still adding information, and then you undid some more of it while I was hunting down a reliable reference. A bit more patience would have saved us both a bit of time and effort. I've added three reliable sources to the Tottenham link now - they're everywhere, and it would have been far easier to check that rather than risking an edit war. I can add more if you like. Next time, waiting more than a handful of minutes before reverting would be advisable, and refraining from shouting would be nice. PS - did you really think that someone could confuse the Tottenham Marshes and Welsh Marches? ...wha? " +Did the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ever use system flowcharts +"I haven't read the Official Babylon 5 Magazine, but since ""Ruling from the Tomb"" was listed third under chronological order when I first saw the Crusade Wikipedia page a few years ago, I thought/hoped that order was given in the magazine and that it had been changed in Across Time and Space, which I own and know lists ""Ruling from the Tomb"" tenth. Did it change from the magazine to the book? " +Buttocks? No one really uses that word anymore. I've replaced it with a more appropriate one. 65.78.144.186 +Help requested to mediate deletion of article Maurizio Giuliano Dear Chair, The above article has been the subject of changes and disputes, and finally it has been deleted. I was involved in editing the article, and I honestly can disclose the fact that I know the subject of the article. But I honestly don't feel that I am biased in favour of the article - though as a lawyer, I trust you can better see whether I am indeed objective as I claim to be. To the best of my perception, most if not all the changes, and the deletion itself, saw the involvement of a specific user, whom I shall not mention out of courtesy. I was surprised by the objections and changes made by the user, but did not object, and instead worked with him to solve the issue and improve my own objectivity. We had some useful correspondence and I felt the issue was being addressed informally. PROBLEM: Now however, the article has been deleted. And I can see on the deletion discussion, that there was no consensus at all. One specific user pushed for the deletion, and a decision was taken to delete, despite many votes to keep. The discussion seems to me very biased against the subject of the article, and I note the following: The objector stated that his status as Guinness record holder is not proven. The subject IS in the Guinness Book of World Records, 2006 edition, page 126 on the UK edition. I can send a copy of the scanned page by email or upload it as may be requested. I think this already makes him notable. (The objector pointed out that some online media cited him as being 23 when he broke the record. He was instead 28, and this is reflected correctly in the Guinness Book and in other media. Some media just got it wrong. I don't see why this should be relevant). Regarding his books, the subject published two books. The objector claimed that these are self-published sources. That is true. But there is also plenty of third-party materials about his books, which you can find online. So, he published two books which have been reviewed by others - he is an author. I think this is enough for inclusion. Finally, the strangest thing: the objector disputes his notability as a UN official ! The issue here is that his status as a UN official was not even mentioned in the article - certainly not until I last saw it ! So, why did this become a topic for discussion ? This makes me almost suspect that there may be a 'personal' element. Regarding other articles where he is cited... The same user has also deleted his name - among many - from the article on the Centre for Social Studies, where there was a sentence stating that the Centre's published authors included him. How can this be disputed ? There is a book with ISBN etc. available on Amazon, clearly indicating that he is the author and the Centre is the publisher. This should be sufficient proof of the fact that he is one of the Centre's published authors. I hope you can resolve the dispute, and my ideal solution would be: - The article is reinstated, and you can make any changes to it you deem appropriate. - If there is anything substantial I object to or if I want to add new info, I shall contact you (or someone you might designate) instead of making changes directly. - The one user who keeps objecting to the article should be asked to refrain from making changes directly, and instead go via you (or someone you might designate). Thanks in advance. +" , it's not fare. There's no attack. Can you tell me what is the attack? I said one can't ""express hatred"" here. I leave this favoritism to community. There is no chance to bring forth new ideas. Hope, Wikipedia will not serve conflicts of interest. " +Actually, it says so in the VC Manual. +Arctic Tipping Points project Has been deleted for being a copy of this please do not copy text from other sites.© +" This article needs to be cleaned up. Look at this quote for instance: ""However, despite the man's awesome prowess"" It's also strange that the article doesn't make a distinction between novel and history information. There is also a problem with the timeline. The article also gives the impression that Gan Ning stopped being a boodthirsty murderer after ""reading literature"". Of course, it was very convenient for whoever wrote this article to leave out the incidence with Lu Meng and the kitchen boy. " +Hi Hi there sir, you seem like a very nice fellow. Would you mind supporting my request for adminiship? Thank you very much. +"]] talk - 16:32, 9 December" +":I think I've clarified things with mike, at least partially. we'll see what happens. what do you think about the revision I made (deleting the regression section and wrapping it into the test scores section)? also, what other analytical problems are you seeing on the page? I'm slowly going through the page looking for misinterpretations of the research that need to be clarified, but I'm happy to focus first on anything that currently concerns you. Ludwigs2 " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ecuador. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. How can I help? " +Pageviews missing Can you comment at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#June_17_Labs_outage_effect_on_still_missing_June_17_pageview_stats. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +Capitalization in article names You have recently renamed several pages to capitalize words that, according to Wikipedia naming conventions and the manual of style, should not be capitalized. I have moved back the following pages that you had renamed: Rose Gold -> Rose gold Racing Game -> Racing game Civil Air Ensign -> Civil air ensign Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Lowercase second and subsequent words in titles, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles for clarification on capital letters in article titles. Thank you. +"Even logged on, I'm still getting ""private page"". " +":::::::::::::""Even your suggestion that I read NPA is a personal attack."" LOL " +" Odd state of article Why is it that the article of Unidentified flying object was like the article Massoud Rajavi after your reverts [HERE]? What happened? Anyways, the article is now in some pretty correct state describing UFO:s. Said: ☻ " +" This needs a speedy close or something like it. In summary: a. there is no requirement that sources (any sources) be available online; plenty of print sources are available and it appears (see Devil's Advocate's comments) that online sources actually are available; moreover, the objection that more ""recent"" sources should be required for an apparently controversial subject holds no water since sources are plenty recent and the topic plenty non-controversial. b. there is no requirement that the article have an image illustrating the subject. c. whether this is or isn't a sport is an irrelevant question. Why wouldn't it be a sport? Chess boxing is called a sport, as is American football, and arm wrestling. In some circles, masturbation is a sport, and competitive eating. One questions the good faith of the editor in listing this: what venues are offered to improve the article, which is the primary objective of WP:GAR? " +Thank you. JohnHistory +Maria Kanellis Is the lovely diva, Maria Kanellis in the game??? +" Fact: The majority of soldiers serving in the Rhodesian Army at the time of the bush war were black. Fact: The ZIPRA/ZANLA ""forces"" never overcame the Rhodesian forces, the majority of internal engagements were short, sharp firefights, the usual result being either the complete annihilation, or dispersal of the terrorist groups involved. The external engagements, or camp attacks always resulted in overwhelming victories for the Rhodesian forces. Fact: ZIPRA/ZANLA were both left wing organisations, with full backing from far-left Marxists states. Fact: ZIPRA/ZANLA ""forces"" deployed within Rhodesia preferred to not engage the Rhodesian armed forces, and this was also not their role, as operating in small groups of up to 20 men, without any form of air support, they could not take on the security on anything approaching equal terms. They were deployed primarily to ""politicise"" the rural black population (usually by terrorising those who did not fully support of their parent organisation into doing so), and to destabilise the economy as much as possible by attacking soft targets. Fact: Neither ZIPRA or ZANLA overcame (as you put it) the Rhodesian army. Possibly the conventionally trained ZIPRA troops who were held back in Zambia, and never committed to the bush war, could have defeated the Rhodesian forces in open battle, considering that towards the end of the war these conventionally trained troops were far better equipped than the Rhodesian forces, but as Nkomo never gave the go order, we will never know. By the sounds of things though, you would not be happy to see anything that is not politically correct, no matter how factual" +- don't know if you've seen my reply here. Also, now that the Doria class article is done with GA, shall we send it to ACR? We should probably think of some other articles we can work together on for after we get Royal Sovereign up to snuff - we of course still have the Bretagnes, but that requires some translation work on your part, so you might prefer some lower-hanging fruit. +"::I agree Lambert asserts that he was first published source, so this part is not totally original research. The verifiability (see wp:v) of his claim is questionable. Why should Wikipedia report Lambert's version without independant verification of his claims? He is not a recognised authority on academic or religious terminology. O'Brien is another primary source, she doesn't work for the OED, or any of the usual places we go to when we want an authorative answer to when terms originated. Also O'Brien does not directly credit Lambert so even this source doesn't directly support the article text. Also neither Lambert nor O'Brien state that the term was ever used to define ""a style of Celtic Studies"". What we really need is a citation that states that the Harvest magazine really was the first appearance. " +Controller is a rip-off of the Wii Amiright? +Back off. Right now. Read the info that's been added. These are perfectly valid citation tags that are being added. +Good point. Though Vin Moosk is a one episode character in KND, but the episode in question revolved around him a bit. Either way, the article is 65+ KB long, so a split is recommended as per Wikipedia:Article Size. (32 KB is a preferred maximum, and anything over 50 KB is guaranteed to need to be split.) +"personal view of ""fire in the lake"" is that it is a dated political tract written at a time (1972?) before many sources were available to write any kind of history. Especially any history about events in North Vietnam during the 1950s. The author of the book further makes all kinds of statements about Vietnamese that with distance sound condiscending or even worse. When the book starts talking about the Vietnamese mind, its almost embarrasing to read it. Yes, it won awards when it was published. But its a very flawed book. For example, the basis of your claim that only 800 people died in the anti-landlord campaign is that her North Vietnamese/NLF friends told the author so. By contrast, Stanley Karnow writing in 1983, was writing in a less hysterical political climate and had access to more material than was available in 1972. My " +It was also from a very early episode of Star Trek, but I could have sworn they stole it from a much earlier twilight zone episode +deletion there was nothing important about this page and there where no real stories about the person like other better of there partners ( ) +Because you have done it to my edits several times, at the last count I think my own edits have been changed 4 times hockeyguy676 1/31/2011 +One l or two? I strongly suspect it's one. Could someone correct the title? (I don't know how.) +Editors wanted Stupid question, but why is the Australian Deputy PM attending and not the PM? Is it to do with negotiations on forming a new cabinet? 216.164.33.62 +Re ,Blocked Thanks for screwing up a newer account of mine you f***king cyber Bullying bastard , you can go to hell, you sick son of a bitch or go fuck yourself for how you treated me you moron. Bye you Fuckign stalker. 220.244.146.157 Kennedy,007 or 220.244.146.157 Whitmore 8621 +MVN The page looks excellent. It is quite impressive. And yes - while much is standard textbook material ... some is not ... and perhaps that is the point ... formulae are being given without reference or citation or derivation/proof, and in the absence of same, it is not clear if such formulae are 'original' or if they are sourced. And if they are sourced, where/what is the source? It would be helpful if the source could be provided. All the best. +ISO 639-3 I started List of ISO 639-1 codes. In future this could be a reference point for a code transition. I you like to add some codes or general thoughts, I am happy -) (Talk) +, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Keep. - 16:21 +Sharjah a former detination Biman had served this route uptil late 1980s or so, consider adding it with valid reference if available, saw it in their route map in a magazine advertisement of the airline. 175.110.222.144 +File: Nemo Submarine Voyage Hi, I got the file from wikimapia on the article about the attraction. I don't know where the person who uploaded it on that website got it from. I'm sorry if it is copyrighted.BeasttoBeast +" I have added information to the article creation RfC's talk page. It takes me a while to dig this stuff up. I will need to spend some time going over it in order to update that RfC to give it the best chance possible of suceeding. I'll get to the other RfC's after that. You are welcome to join in if you like. - '''''''''' (H3O+) " +" 2015 (UTC) Thanks for being so quick off the mark with the latest batch of IP addresses ... I'd gone from blindly reverting every edit the other day to being in complete ""ignore"" mode! - Chat 18:15, 5 May" +I'm housesitting for my grandparents who are out of town. They don't have a computer, so I can only get to mine on certain occasions. +a joke, as they are sometimes interpreted. +Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope Your edit at this article did not make any sense so I reverted it. Also you should not make comments on problems with an article on the article page... that is what talk pages are for. If your care to explain what you see wrong with the diagram in question please do so here . Thank you 69.72.2.71 +" I made exactly one edit to the page in question ten days ago, and two today, in which I removed a statement that was initially false, and then unnecessary and redundant. You threatened to report me after my first revert, then added an ""edit war"" template to my page. Your behavior demonstrates exactly what I stated, that you are immature and seem to believe you own that particular page. 68.81.192.142 " +Androzaniamy Well done. +" How rare, I agree with everything you said! As for the split-off articles, you are very representative of the average reader, in that exceedingly few will go to those other articles. Indeed, few read past the Intro. That is why sending off good information to other articles is so concerning for me. Especially given the fact that BP's biggest court case is in a little over a week's time, and that BP has in the past actually referred to this article in their court case. These facts should have us all on alert, in my opinion. tc " +Thanks for your contributions, and thanks for giving edit summaries: if you look at the article history now, you'll see it's much more convenient and accessible. However, I have to tell you that this website does not count as a reliable source per our standards, and if you really want to improve the article you should replace that link wherever possible with reliable sources. Thanks, +Thanks Hey, Thanks for adding infoboxes to some cpu articles. Its nice to see infoboxed you make being accepted by others. +I came into contact with you with the Green Service Uniform. Very recently. Talk Contribs +As one of the few legitimate Astrologers on Wikipedia, I should be allowed to edit the Astrology pages, especially since there are so many unethical debunker administrators who continually harrass or delete honest input. +" It seems you didn't bother to read the 200 inch telescope article. Hubble says on Pages 165-166 herend I quote: ""Attempts have been made to attain the necessary precision with the 100-inch, and the results appear to be significant. If they are valid, it seems likely that red-shifts may not be due to [turning to page 166] an expanding universe, and much of the current speculation on the structure of the universe may require re-examination."" " +Budwig You have explained nothing. The whole article is devoid of useful information and somehow you seem to have a very important role in keeping it that way. Please explain. Also, please explain your expertise on the subject and how you determined that everything that is currently there is both adequate and complete. Your reversions of information are nothing less than reprehensible as they are totally indiscriminate. +Greece isnt claiming lands in Fyrom.Nor is Fyrom ancient macedonian territory but Thracian one of the paeonians.So the nationalist here is the state of Fyrom. +So, I'll rather let time work in the favor of us all. +wow... are you out of your mind, how was my edit on your talk page vandalism??? I was simply explaining my actions... I see now why you weren't made an admin +exuse me but how dare you block me i havnt said anytting that was untrue FridgeMagnet is out to cause trouble do you have any idea how many people in this complex need to use THIS IP ADDRESSs??? +Your a dirty wanker who loves little boys naked +"Well my ""disruptive"" actions appear to be completely legit and correct." +how big is ur cock i wanna suck u dry +You play. They have left the ArbCom. Neither is active, neither responds, neither comments to ArbCom matters. One of them demonstrably displays bias. Each of them accuses me falsely without providing justification. And you count their votes. You make some narrow point about one case but you endorse their lamentable actions. Shame! +" Even if Godman was a ""scholar"" (haha) of/on UG, I don't see why he should be mentioned in the article. It's an encyclopedic entry, not a ""scholarly"", ""repected"" (hilarious) analysis. It's not an exposition of UG's theories that would necessitate critical enquiry. Do you want to know - encyclopedically, IN BRIEF - who UG was and what he said? Read the article. Do you want to know whether he was - this, that or the other? This is not the place. Look elsewhere and exercise your judgement. The notion that JK and MLK ""are far better articles by any measure"" because of ""number of hits, being quoted etc"" is childish. Popularity is no measure of ""betterness"", especially on the internet. " +Pigsonthewing Tell you what, i'll ask for you from now on then. After asking on IRC for blocks about a billion times in the past few weeks and waiting for the Arbcom to do something after weeks of his constant disruption, bad faith and edit warring, something had to be done about him once and for all. +" Assortive mating This edit represents more of the same problems above; one theory (which by the way is disputed among geneticists, reference criticism of Comings' work in The Gene Bomb) is undue in this article. Please find secondary review sources independent of those who promote the theories, and then consider whether that text belongs in an overview of autism, or in causes of autism if good sourcing can be found. (Talk) " +Category backlog, project backlogs Thanks for your edits to Category:Wikipedia backlog. I just wanted to express an interest in eventually getting a page like that established for WikiProject Medicine. In an ideal world, bots would keep project-specific backlog pages like that maintained. Do you have any ideas on what it would take to do these types of things? +Blocked again I have blocked you again. Sorry, but Wikipedia does not need single-purpose accounts tenaciously promoting fringe views on contentious subjects. Your edits have served solely to promote an agenda and cause dissent on a topic which has more than enough heat already. Guy () +2009 (UTC) Go F*** yourself Golbez. You and Mohammed Atta ought to rot in hell. 01:16, 11 September +Umm... well, I reverted it. Sorry... -( but it's still in the history of the article if you did something else as well. +Exactly. And we'll also need to remove some of the reviewers as well. It's now 1,200 words. That's crazy with a movie where there aren't a lot of divergent opinions. This isn't Last Tango in Paris or 2001: A Space Odyssey> +scripture about peter the apostles house Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate A Boyle +Im sorry but this guy is a real douchebag. Im more than appaled at his handling of the border guard cases. +" False inormation in the article As you would expect, the propagandists would say and do everything to mislead us. They once again proved themselfs to be the proven LIARS we alreayd knew they were since the article wrongly states that the darker picture with the ""fall-off"" effects is the edited one, which is pure BS. The original photo is the one with the ""fall-off"" effect which was printed in The West Australian already back in august 2, 1969 (~6 min in this clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMuTiziCszU) while the lighten up picture is the EDITED version who came out much later. So unless the propaganda trolls cant find a version of THEIR claimed original version dated EARLIER than august second 1969, i suggest them to SHUTUP. Proven fake: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg/179px-Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg Original: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg/180px-Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.145.38.53 Youtube is not a reliable source for information about a conspiracy theory. Is there a reliable source available that supports your claim? The Buzz Alrdin photo is explained at Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#Issues with crosshairs in photos. You talkin' to me? The video shows a guy holding up the actual newspaper from 2 aug 1969 to prove that the ""fall-off"" picture is how the original one looked like, but then its youtube who isnt a reliable source!? your desperate try for making a point is laughable... but i wouldnt expect more from a propaganda TROLL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.145.38.53 No, that newspaper doesn't show what the original one looks like. The original is a transparency that is in NASA's vaults. They made prints that were widely reprinted. See this for more information. You talkin' to me? Bullshit! excuses from NASA wont make it true! you have the history of that picture in the video i linked to and even the NASA site you linked to shows the fact that the darker picture is the first one, the original from 1969, while the more lighten edited version came out 1975. So why you arguing? you dont have a chance here. As i said, BRING UP a picture dated earlier than 2 aug 1969 or SHUTUP - its that simple! 91.145.38.53, please stop insulting other editors and please sign your posts, just put four tildes at the end . I dont tolerating having my talk session closed, this is what the propagandists do? censoring their opponents! Unless the propagandists cant bring up the picture THEY claim to be the original together with a date which needs to be earlier than second of august 1969, i will change the article. False misleading information should never be tolerated! Its already proven that the ""fall-off"" darker version IS the original. If anyone wants to argue, then bring up! 91.145.38.53 The propaganda liars This article is beyond laughable! Since the propagandists trash talking and like to ""debunk"" ppl like Bart Sibrel, Ralph Rene, and Bill Kaysing (with no evidence to debunk them, however) we should debunk the LIARS the propagandists listen to! ""youtube is not a reliable source"" the propagandists says... still they link to youtube videos themselfs to suit their false propaganda in a desperate act to try prove THEIR laughable points. So if they can link to youtube videos, i will do the same just to prove that THEIR sources are nothing else than FALSE PROPAGANDA. Using proven liars like Jay Windley, Phil Plait, and Svectors youtube series as some kinda evidence is laughable. I think that these trolls needs their own section! lets see what kinda ppl who is behind the sites that the propagandists always links to. Its time to face their cl +Nevil Maskelyne The Nevil Maskelyne (stage magician) in the article is not the same Nevil Maskelyne that is linked to. Can we eliminate the hyperlink?64.20.186.2 +WP:EW You are at 3RR on the SPLC page - please be aware that you are likely to be blocked for such edit war behaviour. +When your done with your 8 hour shift message me and I'll watch the abiogenesis page. Do you think we should send out fliers internationally? up to you +In regards to your being a fuckwitz stop being a fuckitz +User talk:135.23.145.164 IS AN IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +(I think kororima (which I thought might be cardamom) could actually be Aframomum melegueta.) +RM personal attack by Islamist BrandonYusufToropov +" Salt Lake City neighborhoods There is Category:Neighborhoods in Salt Lake City, Utah. I don't know how ""officially defined"" any of those are, but many of them are terms in common use to describe sections of the city. HTH, " +I think you may have missed the point... If the result of 52 is that Montoya takes up the mask, fedora, and name, the article Renee Montoya should be updated with that information. The current practice within the Comics Project would then see this article change to Question (Vic Sage) and that one become Question (Renee Montoya) with an updated 'box. — +A full explanation of the edit that sparked this controversy is in a comment here. +" , Exactly what was inappropriate? The essence of my comment is that I think GW would do well a faculty setting. It sure looks like you manufactured an excuse to block.Makin'Bacon " +How can you honestly still be doing this? How is it physically possible to read the proanity and still not read what I am actually saying? You're amazing... It wasn't supposed to be cordial, but of course you haven't been cordial so don't pretend you have. You have lied about my actions, vandalised my edits with sweeping reforms aimed at making your single meaningless point, attacked my good fatih with blatant fantasies and ignored my every comment on the issue so you could keep up your own delusions. But still, once you are made aware of your blatant Personal Attacks, ignorance of policy and arrogance in one sided recognition of the problem editor, you have the audacity to continue to attack my faith. You can try to use sources, but as I never wrote unsourced information, removed sourced, questioned any sources or changed sourced information, it seems to be you in blatant disregard of policy, not I. You added no sources for your edits, I reverted them, made clear why on three occasions and you continued to pretend you knew some higher level of existence in which the reasoning was different and related to your personal interest in a line I have not debated with you about. I have also never EVER shown a POV in my edits, how dare you, when you're not even on topic accuse me off doing so. - +" Danny Welbeck Danny Welbeck If that's the case why is 'English' placed in front of professional footballer? Should it just read as follows. Danny Welbeck is a professional footballer who plays for Manchester United and the England national team? " +News databases In addition to google news, I sometimes use three other news databases: Newsbank, Proquest, and newspaperarchive.com. I recently let my subscription lapse on the last one though. +i c what u did there, that's a good one +, and I did not know where or who to complain to. Wouldn't it be easier and frendlier of you, Sandstein, to direct me to the proper page instead of banning me? +No, why would I do that? I am promising to block because it breaches our policies. If you disagree, please feel free to build a consensus at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content that these images meet our criteria for inclusion. Good luck. +, spanish text. Thanks. 23:47, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) +You suck and we all hate you YOU SUCK! +" The concept of ""viral meme"" is not a mainstream academic concept, and only merits the briefest mention in an encyclopedia. ""Meme"" is already treading on thin ground, but is at least well known enough to be semi-respectable. ""Let's roll"" isn't a concept at allit's a phrase that has made the news recently, and it's the title of a song, both of which deserve to be covered. ""Move zig"" is another phrase, probably meaning more or less the same thing, but it isn't worthy of inclusion here. It isn't even a common enough idiom to be found in a dictionaryyou certainly wouldn't find it, say, in a New York Times used without reference to its source. LDC " +Yeah, whatevs, bot. Just shove a cork in it, will ya? +Lol, I am so very confused right now... +" ""Monkey hanger"" is not an insult " +" You can edit the article the same way you edited my talk page here. Just click the ""edit this page"" tab and make the changes you suggested. @ " +Theory why you're an annoying girl You were popular on Wikipedia, because you developed early and startWikipedoaed giving blow jobs at the age of 11. But now you can'rt bear to look at yourself in the mirror, because all you see is a lesbian. So you pick ob users, just to avoid an inevitable realization that when your body is used up at the age of 28, you're going to be a dried-up, chalky-skinned burlap sack that nobody likes. How's that? Am I in the ballpark? 66.87.130.137 +Similary, they were not doing that badly in the first part of the war, unless of course you are arguing that it was the suicide bombing that caused the japanese success. +" Sorry, I'm not. As you can read in the article for Palestine, the term ""Palestine"" does derive from the Philistines, but it was given to the land by the Romans only in 135 AD, after the Jewish revolt. In the 20th century it was brought back to life by the British, and thus became recognized world wide as ""Palestine"". In any case, the Philistines themselves were not present yet in the land in the year 4,000 BC - they arrived around the time of the Israelites/Jews, and they settled mostly in a relatively small strip along the coast, an area which is partly the Gaza strip. You can read more here, if you want. http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_early_palestine_name_origin.php I think that the definition I gave is very factual and clean of any political affiliation. " +" If you leave a message on someone's talk page, yes, they will probably read it. They may or may not choose to reply. I don't know what you mean by 'discussion;' Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and doesn't have any discussion forums. - (talk · contribs) " +I see. I believe it's the actual dishonesty rather than specific terms that make a debate degenerate, and which should risk a sanction, but there you go. I trust that you'll keep an eye on Caden too after he accused me of lying. +I will move this discussion to User:Filll/Creationism Discussion +Why the heck... ... did you do that? Regards, +. Wichert, Boris, whoever you are, you screwed with me, I will screw with you. You want a conversation, I do not have a problem with that. You are the one who committed the first offense. You removed my edit. I provided some facts, well maybe not facts, after the CRU fiasco who knows what the facts are. It was a direct citation of information from a NASA web site. You first reversed it as Boris and now as Wichert. I have no problem discussing this with you. Send me an email address and we can talk. Pending the discussion, leave my edits alone +called Pest Control and that was what i was looking 4. +Oh, no, quite the contrary, I get that any further communication between us here and on my talk page it is utterly useless. My suggestion (and intention) is to move to the Byzantine discussion page and stick to the issue in question. +Thank you for experimenting with the page List of Disney Channel Series on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk)(contribs) +ONOREM IS A NAZI FAGGOT +There is an error regarding Stead's date as PCA of the year in Playfair. He was COY in 1972. ..AME Roberts was COY in 1974. +Hello I am trying to learn what this does. +No it doesn't, the sources are trivial which makes them fail WP:RS. You only seem to want to keep it cause you like it, which is not a reason to keep an article. guitarist +"::::::: Your personal opinion that ""the movement doesn't have any"" leaders is nice. Sources being cited beg to differ. It is fairly blatant WP:OR to continue to apply your personal assessments as if they take precedence over the cited sources. " +I don't give a damn about being blocked. I shall not stand defmation of my faith by anyone, let alone by the Wahhabies. +" Template:PD-US-record on Commons Wikilegal made a report: meta:Wikilegal/Copyright Status of Sound Recordings Fixed Prior to February 15 1972 C " +The Arabic SOHR report confirmed that regime forces lost all areas they captured since the start of the offensive,so stop making up things,SOHR is still reliable more reliable than the pro-regime sources you listen to. +Oh, I see now, I did not read the deletion request properly. Don't worry, there is no agenda to be pushed here. I simply read the Greek diaspora page and seeing that there is no section for Greeks in Eygpt I thought I would help. BTW I know there are at least half a million Greeks there still and some of the most famous Greeks in modern history are from there. I have put the article into the Greek wiki listings for expansion already. +your invoking your peronal opinions when you say no snitching nonsense. thats how you feel about it and thats ok. many others disagree +Yes. This revival of a four-year-old account is an opportunity for checkusers to maybe figure out who that guy really is and put a stop to its activities. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ +I did not say Goth Metal I said Goth Rock and I will point out that Evanescence has nothing to do with Gothic metal nor Goth Rock. They fall more into the Alternative rock/metal genre. There sound has nothing to do with Goth Rock. So I'm not going to take much from Gregor Mackintosh's interview. Yes Evanescence is big but to place them in with real Goth Rock band or real Gothic Metal band is a slap in the face to those bands.98.224.211.86 +Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | talk +The editor, Amagase who has disputed with me on Fraud and Seven-Branched Sword said I'm okay to bring thiissue at ANI or whatever. I'm getting not only highly uncivil personal attack but also his threaten to raise arbitration on me. Well, I think I'm the one who really need a arbitration on Japanese editors behaviors, but I'm only one and they're many, so I guess where his threat comes from. According to Amagase's rationale for his 3rr violation, I'm here to degrade Japan and anti-Japanese and ultra-nationalistic Korean editor.. Well, I strongly disagree on the allegation, judging by his blanking Korean mentions on several articles of ancient Japan. This 3RR report, civility issue and content disputes on may be off your surveillance on J-K related articles but something needs to be done for this. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Amagase reported by User:Appletrees (Result: ) Talk:Fraud#Shinichi_Fujimura +To say it forthright: It's advertisement. There is not the weakest hint that esc. actually is so unequally better than c., as the claims suggest. It is an info page and not a stage for advertisement. If the studies were provided (if they exist at all!), the reader could judge himself and he could also have a close look at their (potential) weak points. I have no problem with unreferenced texts, but my credo is: provide reliable refs or remove the passages (to the talkpage or nirvana resp.) if there is a single one who mistrust them! Quality comes first!P.S.: I am (quite) well aquainted with WP. +" Windows 7 editions Thanks for editing the article Windows 7 editions. It's great to have people fix typos when they find them. That's what keeps Wikipedia great. Unfortunately, in this case I don't think there actually was a mistake. You corrected ""Vista Business"" to ""Vista Professional"". As far as I know, ""Vista Business"" is actually the correct name. For that reason I undid your change to the article. Please let me know if you think I've made a mistake. And please do keep correcting typos when you find them! Thanks. — " +Lyrics The links you are adding to the rollingtimes.org sites are all links to copyright violations. These aren't permitted.— +" You can of course, no need to ask. — (talk2me) " +You missed one. We can play this game all night +" Image:Futuramapilot.jpg User:OrphanBot put the ""this image will be deleted in 7 days"" on Image:Futuramapilot.jpg. The reason to not delete the image is I have re-added it to Space Pilot 3000. " +you are still a stupid cunt of a whore! you are still a stupid cunt of a whore! +Quick Question If I recall correctly, you indicated recently that you intended to take a month long break from Wikipedia due to addiction. Do you still intend to take that break? I do not mean any offense, so please don't take it that way. But, if you are addicted, a self-imposed break could be really useful. Why the change in plans? +" of course I posted my unblock request right as you posted this comment otherwise maybe I wouldn't have made the request. I'm not having any problems with anyone else as you can see but Tennis Expert has multitudes of problems. Is it everyone else and not him? I did not contact him and never would have except for his out of the blue attack. I can accept punishment as well as the next guy and if you truly feel I was wrong for my ""response"" then I can live with a temporary block. But what burns me is the injustice of being fair to both sides if I get smacked and TE gets tapped." +There is no clear reason for this. +Pretty much all the songs are on YouTube now. Making it common knowledge. No source needed.67.34.181.210 +" Speedy deletion of Polish Briton A tag has been placed on Polish Briton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Harry the Dog WOOF " +No problem at all! Mistakes happen. I just wanted to let you know in case some tool needed an error report. - ✉ +Family life events Nishad chakma is the father of chandra jyoti chakma & his mother name is kamala devi chakma They are 3 brother &1 sister. Her elder brother name is binoy jyoti chakma & smaller brother name is sunil bikash , Ruma is their smaller sister of brothers. +Yes! I will, soon! I just got to find someone to help me upload stuff. +New name based on this: this article should be named contrversy about using the term Apartheid in the context of the Israeli-paestinian conflict +STOP PUTTING BACK THINGS THAT I ALREADY REMOVED FROM MY OWN TALK PAGE! THIS IS THE REASON WHY YOUR SYSOP APPLICATION HAS NEVER BEEN APPROVED AND WILL NEVER BE APPROVED! YOU ARE ONE SICK FUCK! GROW UP AND QUIT BEING A NUISANCE! MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS! YOU ARE NOT A SYSOP! == +"==Andrew WIlcko== Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. " +" http://www.archive.org/stream/historyofinquis03leah/historyofinquis03leah_djvu.txt 263. The Templars cites the five charges against the Templars. One mentions the worshipping of a ""man with a long beard"". New book cited sounds like some sensationized version. What is the refernce point and the reference given for this author's statement that the picture was of Jacques de Molay? Never heard of it. Also, why is the fact that Geoffroi de Chanry's wife was the first recorded owner of the Shroud of Turin in the ""Legend"" section? " +" Looks like ""Sixend"" was monitoring the goings-on and decided to do a bit of trolling. The article is intact. In the meantime, I'm sorry for torquing you off. As I said, I want what's best for the site. We're all told to ""be bold"" in editing and sometimes toes get treaded on. - " +go to die go to die +Auckland Climate Please see Talk:Auckland#Auckland Climate. +" Let's move the NYC Subway pages all at once, then. I am fine with that. (give him tirade • check out damage) " +" Did you get this quote from Lendrum, or was it from Porter? " +January 2013 (UTC) Congratulations. Wish you all the best with the admin tools. 10:36, 16 +Your Harassment Of Me Will you pplease stop following me around and reverting every edit I make, I realise we have had disagreements, but it is getting silly now. You revert EVERY edit I make and if it continues I will report you for harassment. +Hello and welcome to Wikipedia- the encyclopedia that all can edit but few can accept. Thank you for your contribution, which has unfortunately been unaccepted, and has now been uncontributed. +Why is it the BillCJ insists on screwing around with my articles - have been doing the survivors seriers for 18 months now - have been usinig the same format with naming the series all along and all of a sudden BillCJ insists on vandalizing my articles- yet he keeps doing it. SIGH SIGH SIGH! I AM GETTING SICK AND TIRED OF BILLCJS NONSENSE - HAVE ASKED YOU ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS TO PUT A STOPS TO HIS CRAP AND YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING... I DEMAND that BillCJ be perminently blocked from Wikipedia for his child like nonsense in playing a game on one-ups manship - everytime I work on an article he issists on playing these games. If you do not block him for his nonsense then I want my request (to have him perminently) blocked forwarded to an administrator who will see BILLCJ playing wikipedia editing games with other editors. +" Oppose (per numerous arguments previously laid out). As do others. Is that all? (talk) " +" Giants, you don't ever miss much, do you? I suspect that when he said ""life the block"", he may have meant ""lift the block"" )) I was thinking he may have to ""life"" it, because there was no accusation there was a question replaying PotW's own words (that he was the original publisher when a redlinked account was the original publisher, how do we reconcile those two?) that has not yet been answered. I think PotW could simply say, no that's not me, the first editor was the redlinked account, but asking what he means by saying he is the original publisher is not the same as an accusation. Anyway, I'm glad you are paying attention here, particularly to the fact that less than 24 hours ago I found some pressing issues in a TFA on which Mark was the nominator (misrepresentation of sources in several eyebrow-raising statements) that could hardly be missed because they were on the main page, and which Mark's co-nominator courteously and quickly resolved, before going on to find a few more ... perhaps I'm to get the message that I'm not to raise sourcing concerns on TFAs anymore? After being out all afternoon, and heading out again, I'll catch up on all of this later ... apologies *always* work, and perhaps by the time I'm back on again, I will find an apology from Mark. This sort of thing is not infrequent on Wikipedia. Oh, and thank goodness no one lifted the block or wheel warred or whatever (no, NYB, there would not have been an unblock request I've always believed it's best to let bad blocks stand); these issues are not infrequent on Wikipedia, experienced editors know they go with the business of being here, but when other admins lift blocks or wheel war, that only complicates subsequent matters for the arbs. Best, (Talk) " +" Thanks for the note. I agree: ""sort of"" means ""no"". I'm going to wait and see if they're maybe giving my comments some thought. But isn't it funny, the visibility he desires for the colors makes the actual text illegible for those who can't easily see colors anyway. I've gone through dozens of college football articles, and I'm sick of the Crayola culture in them. Thanks again, " +ya, China and chinese should be renamed too P +Recent revert I hope you're proud of yourself, you Wikipedia-moderating, pussy-nosed son fo a bitch. You spend your time removing graffiti on the most redundant and incoherent encyclopedia ever written, or at least initiated the automated process. You enforce the bureaucratic library ethics so nobly! When humanity goes extinct from superficiality and escapism, this will surely impress the abyss. You're really such an altruist. I hope you get so constipated. 204.116.255.13 +Bugreport for Editcount on wmflabs.org Hello Cyberpower678, I tried your edit counter tool on wmflabs.org (Thanks for the great work!). I have found a little bug. When I look at the Monthly Chart with my Firefox 28.0 I do not see the whole month label (see this screenshot). Adding a margin-left:... or left:... to the does not help, so it may be a bug inside the SVG...?! Greetings, +It's kind of a moot point. Another point is that as long as we are getting into particulars, naturopathic medicine is NOT a medical system. Allopathy, Osteopathy, Chiropractic, even TCM are medical systems. Naturopathy is a mixture of other medical systems but not its own system. For purposes of law a naturopath should have a separate license or certification for every medical system employed. So for example if allopathic blood tests or pharmaceuticals are used then a license in Allopathic is needed. The license specifies that kind of practitioner for that type of practice. TCM and Chiropractic are licensed in the same way. Naturopathic doctors seem to be requesting an all inclusive license to practice any kind of medical system that they want. Naturopaths do specifically have homeopathy as a medical system however homeopathy is nonsense and everybody knows it. You would all do yourselves a HUGE favor if you got rid of that one practice. Don't bother sending over the studies. I've already seen them and if you don't understand what is wrong with those studies then you just proved my point about naturopathic students not coming from serious research programs. Another thing to keep in mind is that we all know that the medical establishment has problems but that doesn't prove that naturopathy is effective. This is a basic logic equation. Those two things are mutually eclusive. The medical establishment doesn't work because of all of the periferal garbage that keeps practitioners from being effective at what they do and not because the medical system itself is ineffective. Western medicine if highly effective when it is allowed to work unencombered. Another thought about naturopathy is that you should take some notes from the TCM people. They want TCM tested by western scientific standards and the result has been that thier system of medicine has proven itself effective. In areas where it has been proven ineffective, they are happy to acknowledge it as ineffective. If Naturopathy did the same then homeopathy would out of the picture almost immediately. The difference is that TCM practitioners know that thiers is founded in a belief system that over time has become an effective medical practice and where belief will no longer suffice, they are happy to scrap it. The result, TCM practitioners are licensed at the masters level and the final stages of the OMD degree with full licensing nationwide is well underway with support from the medical establishment. In fact they will have this licensing while you guys will still be insisting that homeopathy works. What's worse is that you guys have been in practice for much longer than TCM has even been in the U.S. Something to think about. You have to answer the problem of not having a unique naturopathic system to test as well. Therein lies the problem of being in a position of requesting an all encompassing license to practice anything and everything. The practice has to be defined properly to be licensed and must be disinguishable from other practices. It cannot simply be a combination of parts from other licensed practices. -Mike the exercise scientist +French Toast article Can you give me a reason why you reverted my edits on the French toast article? I have provided references from Slate.com and The Houston Press. 72.145.147.65 +Hi again Sorry to be so slow to respond to your message... I don't really know of any other notable monasteries. There are probably tons and tons and tons more but I doubt many have much coverage. The monastery in Kaya for instance only has one monk that lives there and only part time - I don't think that's notable. Maybe one day the Skiu monastery will have an article but I think it will be a long time before anyone digs up sources... Today I may do some photo uploading and incorporation into articles, we'll see. Ever since getting back from India a week ago I have been sick with a fever. And yesterday I got a weird rash all over my body. The doctor I went to see doesn't know what's wrong. This morning my fever seems to be gone so that's encouraging at least! Ah, strange tropical illnesses.... So I mostly have been just laying around feeling sorry for myself and sleeping all the time. ( Hopefully it will clear up soon - otherwise I have to go see an infectious disease specialist! ugh... +" The PVV has nothing to do with any definition of libertarianism. i have no idea where that would come from. futhermore, we usually label people by their ideologies, rather than defining ideologies by the people we choose to associate with it. maybe Vladimir Lenin is right-wring and/or conservative.· Lygophile has spoken " +I am pretty sure I was notified of the discussion there because I am allowed to place input, just as you are? Or are you further trying to devalue any input placed by an anonymous user?? Inquiring minds, all that. 96.236.176.181 +I'm sorry I'm sorry you're black I know it's hard to afford the unniggerfication surgery +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cell division. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Martin451 (talk) " +Thanks Deb, I've seen your commentary in several places here and there recently, and I just wanted to thank you for the time you take to make Wikipedia a kinder and more helpful place. I'm sure you don't get enough appreciation for it, and it occurred to me that perhaps a very brief note would be welcome. Thanks again and please do keep up the excellent work, 17:46, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) +- especially when I'm exposing people like OM. +" I removed the second sentence of this article ""Syria is often seen to be in support of terrorism and terrorist groups in the Middle East""? Because of NPOV concerns. Yes, this is an issue with Syria but in its current location it gives the impression this is the primary item of interest concerning Syria. Other countries accused of harboring terrorism Libya, North Korea, Iran do not have a statement in such a prominent position. 17:40, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)" +[htttp://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Age of Empires III/ +I am sick of you saying I am a vandal. +a single source nothing was put together +OK, I see my mistake. The article states that the acceleration due to gravity is g=1, but actually the acceleration itself is not constant. (OK, so its a simple pendulum and it should be obvious...I guess I didn't look hard enough). +What do you mean i lack experiance ive been here since December 2005 +MY EDITS WERE LEGITIMATE Okay!???? +I protest. I never accused you of anything and said on the talk page that you can speak for yourself. +" Hi David, thanks for your answer. However, I could not find any place on this page where I have ""distorted, selected, or combined evidence to suit my own view"". I am a scientist in the field of metrology and if you make such a serious accusation you should back it up. I am pretty sure that everything I wrote (in the article) was based on sources. If you think I wrote something without sources, show me exactly where. And then, when you are at it, please show me a source where the term ""Kendrick mass"" is properly defined. I know that it is used frequently, but I did not find a definition so far. This lack of definition is the reason why I was against the renaming my article to Kendrick mass and this became the basis of this dispute. Thanks for your help. Metrology is the science of measurements and it includes the ""grammar"" of quantitative communication. It therefore is very universal. It will be very difficult to find an article that is not ""metrology-related"". This is why I think your ban is much to broad. You will probably not find a single page on wikipedia that is not ""metrology-related"", depending on how narrowly you define this term. To give you an analogy: this ban is like banning someone on ""english-related"" articles. Would this include all pages that contain english text? Could you please define what you mean with ""metrology-related""? Thanks for explaining me the procedure of becoming unbanned. I will work on it as soon as I understand where exactly I misbehaved. " +It's Arabic because it's the name of a predominantly Arabic speaking town. In the same way that Manhattan is called by and begins with the English-speaking version, and only lower down explains about the origins of the name. As this article points out, Bethlehem has a complex origin, and the origins of the name are probably Caananite. +" I work with enterobacteria every day and phage therapy was discussed on an expert meeting I went to. Phage therapy was exhumed recently but most of us see the therapeutic potential overrated particular by the mass media. That is not to say that there is no potential but there is too much evidence against a widespread use. I think we all would like to have good handle in the light of multiresistant strains. There is no real track record of tests that were carried out in the west but as far as we know some attempts were made in early years (failures are rarely published). There are newer test in the literature carried out in the food industry and in mice. The idea that things were ""forgotten in the West"" is often used to give weight to arguments but in modern research there is hardly anything left that is not written in English. There is a lot of information on the web that we should take into account, including positive arguments for phage therapy, for instance this review. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db;=pubmed&dopt;=Abstract&list;_uids=16258815 However, even in the postive light that the review draws, one should not forget about the severe problems that need to be tackled. Note that the problems of resistance also present phage therapy, the added amount of time to find the course of the infection and the massive allergic reactions you could provoke by phage particles. I'll assemble some more data and will edit the article soon, more comments too. " +DreamGuy Someone has accused of being in violation of sock protocol. DreamGuy will need your assisstance. +I am personally geneticist and Elhaik did not carry out any genetic study, so his article has no place in the section regarding actual genetic studies, because it is against all genetic studies (and all genetic studies refuted the Khazarian hypothesis which is considered both by historians and geneticists as falls. Basic WP:UNDUE rule. Considering Zoossmann-Diskin as a legitimate study it is mentioned, yet as his conclusions are backed by ratio 1:23 he does not go in repetition, lead or background again- Basic WP:UNDUE rule +"== Removing Dyer references == I propose removing from the references section the books written by Dyer. I have not read Dyer's books, but from what Node_ue says, it seems to me that he's just a crank. He appears to have no clue in linguistics. I don't think a sane linguist would take two random people, put them to translate a text from Yiddish, compare the resulting texts and get to the conclusion: ""yep, we have two different languages"". Also, he uses made-up expressions such as ""sovetul (sic!) de deputaţi"" or ""cuvinte slujitoare"" to prove his points, which is akin to data fabrication in regular science. Bogdan, Dyer did not come to the conclusion that Moldovan and Romanian are truly separate languages. With regards to the parallel translation, he says ""the greatest difference between these two texts are in the vocabularies and in the styles they employ. There is a more 'flowering' prose in the Moldovan text... to reiterate, the difference here is one of style, not one of substance"". Actually, ""le style est l'homme même"", as Buffon once said. Dyer starts from the premise that the style in each country is homogenous: it is not, there are much more differences between different individuals in the same country. His ways of studying language is just as useless as the way the Nazis studied genetics by assuming the homogenity of the Aryan race. Yes, that's his point. That nearly all of the differences between the two passages are not differences between two languages, but just because two different translators. Earlier, you said ""...a sane linguist would take two random people, put them to translate a text from Yiddish..."". Actually, he got these comparisons from published translations in ""Romanian"" and ""Moldovan"". He didn't just walk up to random people on the street. The only actual possible grammatical difference he finds in the texts is Moldovan ""pe tot ce vretsi"", and Romanian ""pe cît vretsi"". There were very few web results for ""pe tot ce vreti"" (about 5), and one of them was from the Zdob shi Zdub website (a Moldovan band). There were no results in Moldova for ""pe cit vreti""/""pe cat vreti"". So that may or may not be valid. I personally would say ""pe tot ce vretsi"". But I don't know if it's real. I suppose this is part of an expression, such as ""jur pe tot ce vrei"" or ""pun pariu pe tot ce vrei"". Anyway, both sound common enough in Romanian and sounds pretty subjective choosing one for Romanian and one for Moldovan. Now, neither of those expressions is ""made up"". He takes both from M. Bruchis' work, ""one step back, two steps forward"" which is also quite critical of the notion of an independent Moldovan language. But can this author prove they exist? Probably not, since no google hits are found. Michael Bruchis, you mean? I'm sure he can. He's an expert, too. He wrote an entire book on the subject. Just because no Google hits exist doesn't mean an expression isn't real do you find any Google results for cit vreti%22+site%3A.md or cat vreti%22+site%3A.md? Or even tot ce vreti%22+site%3A.md? No, you don't. But that doesn't mean that nobody says those things in Moldova. How many results do you find for ""instrumente gramaticale""? 37, and none of them are at .md websites. You can find the word ""cuvintelnic"" on Google, but does that mean it's really the Moldovan word for ""dictionar""? No, Moldovan ppl only use that word when we're joking. (dexonline.ro finds 0 results too). Just because a term occurs or doesn't occur on Google, doesn't mean it is or isn't real. ""sovetul"" is not a misspelling. Rather, it's a Soviet-era spelling ""soviet"" was spelt as ""sovet"". Some Moldovans still spell it that way although it's usually considered incorrect; however he is quoting the phrase from Bruchis, who published his work a bit earlier when the spelling was still accepted. I agree with your opinion. Such an ignorant person like ""expert Dyer"" can't be called expert. talk & contribs " +It means that Vennard's opinion is questionable and that you should look for other citations. Someone above has questioned the statement, too. It doesn't make sense to readers of the article. +] I've had enough of your misbehavior. I don't have to endlessly debate a person who wants to dictate policy by fiat. You have a problem, go use the appropriate talk pages. +REDIRECT Talk:168th Infantry Regiment (United States) +Well DUH, it like says HMAS Canberra right on it. +" On second thought, Max, I just took a look at the history and saw that you posted not only the link that you say you're not defending, but also the link to the material from the white supremacist antisemite, William Pierce. There's no need to keep the link on the page while discussing its merits (although that link has no merits to discuss). Wikipedia's editors know how to look at edit histories. When a link is that egregious and beyond the pale, any responsible editor will remove it until it's existence can be justified. Also, I didn't ""remove an external link ""without cause."" I explained my cause, both here and in the edit summary. That cause was not a ""claim that it's offensive in some way,"" but a clear, obvious violation of WP:EL and WP:RS with regard to fringe websites. However, I've just taken a look at your edit history, and can honestly say that, outside of your edits to this article, I can't see any evidence of an antisemitic agenda on your part, so I'm going to continue to WP:AGF. However, it will be to your advantage to recognize that editors who are accustomed to working on Judaism-related articles have long experience with users who ""just innocently raise the question"" of whether there might be racist material in the Talmud, or whether there just might be a Jewish conspiracy for world domination, or whether we've fairly portrayed the views of folks who think that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a genuine document, and shouldn't we leave the material up while we discuss it? The answer to that question is no, and if my assumption of good faith is justified, you'll have no trouble seeing why. Again, Max, follow those links and you'll see why neither you, nor I, nor any responsible editor would want them to stay on this article or any other that we had a hand in. I'm honestly not trying to start a feud or a flame war or anything else, and I do wish you the best experience possible on Wikipedia. " +Nice additions to the instrument articles. Rackett is sure a weird beast! I've played with one occasionally I don't do double reeds, but I had to toy with it anyway. By the way, when modifying entries like sackbutt, you should check first to see if it automatically goes to sackbut (as it does), in which case there's not much reason to change the spelling (considering how many spellings there are for sackbut.) I assume you're a double-reed player with a fondness for Renaissance horns? ∇∆∇∆ +" Enric, are you referring to title case? I think you'll find that it's widespread. Certainly in journal articles and conference proceedings it's like a full-body rash. While I fully support WP's insistence on sentence case, my point is that if we really did go by the balance of external sources in style and formatting, WP would look rather different. (talk) " +Blocked again for one month. +" File:Arginase.jpeg Hi, with what software did you create this picture? " +" You are going to sit idly by and let these editors get away with such things. Surely calling one a Nazi is worse than telling editors that I will fight them on something they have a history of doing. And since when has others calling me a fucking Nazi part of any topic ban? I don't recall you banning me from the topic area of ""lets call Russavia a Nazi and HistoricWarrior a wanker"" - can you show me the article that goes along with that? What a fucking joke. Dialogue " +":::Believe it or not, I was rather busy over the last two months, so I had no desire to get into a large debate with you. Reverting vandalism is much easier than debating though, which is why I've assisted in maintaining the page. The biggest problem is that the definition of main event varies. For example, why is Chavo/Kane from WM24, a match never promoted by the company as a main event, listed, but not Flair/Michaels from the same show, which the company considered making the actual main event (and, indeed, several WWE folks said afterwards that it should have). Other examples exist. Why Kane/Undertaker from WMXX, but not Undertaker/Michaels from WM25, another match which was heavily promoted and considered for the final match on the show? (Presumably, it's because someone around here is a Kane fan) Because of these (and other) inconsistancies, we should limit it the actual final match on the card. 0422 " +HoJ Your recent revert at Historicity of Jesus was a bit premature. Reverts should be accompanied by discussion, as mine was. If you had waited for more than 60 seconds (not an awful lot of time to think about my argument) you would have seen discussion on the talk page. I'm going to revert your change and wait for your comments there. Thank you. +"Refer to ""Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising"". Within http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ELNO#Links_normally_to_be_avoided Should you continue to attack my work then I will ask that Wikipedia ban your IP range. I also ask that you show who you are and provide sufficient contact details." +Given that Moses and Abraham are fictional characters, there is no reason to list them as notable Jews. 17:01 August 15th 2012 (EST) +" Oh please, please, please, can I be unblocked sir? " +Steve was warned by IanManka(check the history) about things on other sites not being pertinent to here. It looks like you are condoning his libel of me. It is located at this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Angelika_23 +" I'm very sorry, but I really don't know much at all about the details of fair use policy, beyond that it's a difficult area (in that the Wikimedia Foundation has to be tough on this for legal reasons, but that its enforcement is contentious and difficult). May I suggest that you first try to discus with the issue with the editor who reverted, and if the two of you can't reach agreement that you ask (talk) • (contribs) " +Dirty Heroine This was a non-notable band according to the criteria set out in WP:Music. Perhaps Myspace would be a better location for this information rather than an encylopedia, until the criteria are satisfied. (aeropagitica) +WP:3RR on Collapse of the World Trade Center +I think we need more pictures (99.226.69.43 ) +Well, Ayn Rand certainly wasn't a libertarian socialist in history. She was a objectivist, much closer to a anarcho-capitalist in history. So moving everybody over there isn't a complete solution, either. Or an I understanding the issue correctly? 18:40 Sep 18, 2002 (UTC) +" Your repretition of a hoax will not give you a Gobbels result. You are showing your ""true"" biased colors in this discussion." +I retitled as 'bibliography', and merged with 'further reading'. +That only applies to the USA. Recipes vary regionally. +" I provided three cites that male tennis players are better than female ones. So what about that not at the bottom of the list of notable tennis players?  ►  " +" Reply to request: As an editor (which you are) you are encouraged to be bold and fix it yourself. You should feel free to choose the phrasing you feel is best, and don't be too surprised if another editor later makes changes. That is the nature of a collaboratively edited encyclopedia. If you want to gain the consensus of other editors, it is better to ask this sort of question on the article's talk page rather than on a User talk page. You will get the attention of more interested parties there. —    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — " +Under no circumstances should this discussion be deleted, let it remain as a testament to the stupidity of the vocal few and so Wikipedians know who the anti-Semites are at the Wiki. +" Agne, it is absurd of you to say that you are saving this article from deletion. This article was put for deletion a couple of years ago and it was [roundly defeated]. Your edits constitute vandalism because they stip the article of interesting and useful content. Please go away and ""save"" something else. " +File:GoogleChromeWindows5037538.png I have tagged File:GoogleChromeWindows5037538.png as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. +" forgot you were ""there"", bad time for attempt at a joke " +Is it perhaps not true that, before fiat money, inflation was adding one or millions of monetary units to the money supply. With the advent of fiat money - what you call creating money out of thin air, a reality or fact that you are in total denial about (although the whole world economy operates like that and there is no sign that it is going to change), even more in denial than you accuse us mainstreamers of, so prices rise as the result of a complex of economic activities, at the same time the money supply increases as well as a third factor operating at the same time, that is, actual new wealth created in the economy. Since only a specific level of money supply is required at any specific level of wealth in the economy, the rise in the general price level indicating inflation, is the way inflation is revealed as well as measured. +Your change to the page October 23 was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. +" No, it shouldn't be removed, not without knowing what the source is. It says ""from an old encyclopedia"", which generally means it's out of coyright but the author is too afraid of being sued for trademark infringement to provide a proper academic reference. 06:22 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)" +" You do not own a page because it happens to be related to you. You especially do not own its talk page. You deleted EVERYTHING Hipocrite said, not just statements that could be seen as attacking. By the ""personal attacks"" you made, I refer to ""cretin"" and ""idiot"". And yes, I can block you if you continue to vandalize by deleting comments, or file a request for comment or arbitration if you continue to be incivil. Factual inaccuracy is no excuse for incivility and personal attacks. ~~ '''''' (t/c) " +WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE EXPOSED!! DROP YOUR RELATIONS WITH ANTI AMERICAN HATE GROUPS 'WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE EXPOSED!! DROP YOUR RELATIONS WITH ANTI AMERICAN HATE GROUPS WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE EXPOSED!! DROP YOUR RELATIONS WITH ANTI AMERICAN HATE GROUPS 'WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE EXPOSED!! DROP YOUR RELATIONS WITH ANTI AMERICAN HATE GROUPS +And not a half bad page at that! You're getting the hang of it -) 22:09, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) +Like I said before, this is not a Wikipedia thing. It's you at ED. I'm not expecting you to cop to it, I'm just asking you not to do it. Wikipedia is not the real world, and I don't care about what you say about me here, but off-Wiki is another issue. This is not me using Wikipedia to leverage you with some lame accusation thing. This is just me asking you not to do it. Wikipedia is just not that important. I'm sure in the real world you're an okay guy. Peace. +I do Support a separate Casey Anthony article as her notability has reached beyond the July non-murder conviction of her. +My commets Somebody erased my comments on you discussion page see in history: Jan Dzierzon and Name. Andrew +Yes, that's an excellent fair use rationale. If you plan to reasonably (and, preferably, provably) claim that the image has been produced for promotional purposes, you might review the text of which may save you much typing. The particular images I spotted were the ones in Motorized bicycle, where I think you also need to replace the very old image with one of the PD tags, probably . -talk +Get real! What is the diff between a man and a woman? Is that a SEXIST question? +"Wow ""Liz""? You actually met thee Garrett Hedlund -bows down to- ~ Ina" +Hey M(asturbator)O(f)L(ies)O(r)B(rainsick)O(pinions) I see, such Idiots like you never give up! Fortunately I know that you are not a Pole, but a f... bastard who wants to destroy the reputation of every real Pole who has some intelligence! +Bat ye'or is an authoritve source ,at least she comperhends logic unlike this Annemarie Schimmel, no wonder Spencer and so forth think that Academia is completely Biased. So its non-muslims fault they are slaves for not converting (and forceing muslims to take them as POW's) is going to WP stance on islam and slavery. +Hm. It seems that Pandrea's comment there allows me to mention it. +KIDS, WANT TO GET MOLESTED THROUGH YOUR COMPUTER SCREEN, IT FEELS REALLY GOOD, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ THIS ARTICLE ON WIKIPEDIA, AND MAGICALLY, JIMBO WALES'S HAND WILL APPEAR AND RUB YOUR PENIS!!! BAN me please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am nothing but a fat, evil, useless troll and vandal with a 1-inch long penis. +COMPLAIN & AND MORE COMPLAINS THATS WHAT U'RE GOOD FOR ! FUCKIN IDIOT ! If I happen to know who u are I'll wallop the shit out of u damn bastard ! FUCK OFF ! BLOODDY SON OF A BITCH ! +Season's tidings! FWiW . +That's right, these were not all under one movement, such as Dervish in the north, but they all had the same goal. Should we make a single article covering all of these and if there are major ones they will also obtain their own article? +I really cannot understand why you think it was important for the sentence to be that way - I was not resisting you. I asked for sources, and you provided them. I have made the change you suggested, and added the NEJM reference. Hopefully, that will help prevent it from being reverted. Sorry I did not pay attention to the fact that you're not yet able to be bold - it was not meant to add to your frustration. Nice suggestion, and I'm glad you were persistent. +" I just came across the expression in a book ""Stiff Upper Lip, Jeeves"" by PG Wodehouse. It's used by Wooster in the context of the article. The phrase ""mighty white"" comes up often. (Written in the 1920's in England)." +heh , if you thought it was too much , you could have just removed that comment not my whole argument. point taken though 86.123.168.47 +" Well, it can be see as ""Pyrrhic"" only in context of the battle (victory with heavy casualties), but of course not in the context of whole Alexander's campaign. Glad you like it, not bad for non-named ""vandal""? ;) 93.142.147.100 " +Welcome! Hello, Jay2980, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +" Regarding ""wars argument"" - thanks, I will do that soon. Here is my thinking, Krugman's criticism is mentioned 8 times in a article. It is intellectual dishonesty (and one of character) to loudly criticize one school of thought and than refuse to even debate for an hour with an actual austrian economist; where he has debated with politicians ""to boost his book sales"" in his own words. So if his critic is in any way or form relevant, why not settle it once for all and end with austrians, or if he doesn't want to lose his time on irrelevant things, he has humanitarian incentive (or why call out austrians in a first place?)... So all in all, it comes to this, either criticizer and critic is irrelevant and should be deleted, or what is in my opinion far better solution, this discrepancy should be there for readers to know and decide for themselves. This could be done in one or two sentences, just a note that he refuses the offer of debate from 2010 although 105 000$ fund for Food bank New York was established; + a link to site. " +iddiot you haven't reverted anything! +Piss off, she is an ignorant bitch. +":* OK, how does this revision look? The Paperboys#Recording and performance history (T) " +From what I see, not care that I was completely unable to file the complaint at the time. +What is the best way to properly format these references to ensure the article maintains the high standards we want. +" Also, ""The Sun"" is generally considered completely unreliable by researchers (it probably has the word reputation for accuracy of any british paper either it or the Daily Mail)." +How dare you. I am a believer that everyone can edit on Wikipedia. You are obviously prejudiced against Australians and especially Australian women. I have heard from you and your kind before. I am a believer that even if I am confined to the mental health unit at Royal Brisbane Hospital I can edit on Wikipedia. I am a speaker of English as a first language. I am a believer in free speech. I won't give you my details because they are watching me and they will come and hurt me by injecting drugs into my bottom again. Why can't you realise this. Just let me express myself again and do not be a believer that people should be supressed.58.110.130.60 +December 20 2006 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +. Rich Wareham comes in to defend at 13:23 +mang mang i fucked this one girl so hard in her asshole it turned into a rosebud then i made her cum all ova da place +, this city has a population of 1.5 million! +Alhambra High School ‎ Per the school administration, the information on Ms. Sanchez was false. I have removed it. Thank you. +" ""I don't understand why you think the definition belongs only with momentum/time."" the reason is pedagogical within the physics discipline. it would be a tautology to define the Joule as the amount of energy required to move a body against a force of 1 Newton the distance of 1 meter, then at the same time, define the Newton as 1 Joule per meter. it's true but it says nothing about the quantities of the Joule or of the Newton (nor anything about their dimesion). it is not like the chicken and egg, we know which one comes first (meter, kg, second come first, then the Newton before the Joule). the Planck force is a derived unit and will have to be the Planck unit of momentum divided by the Planck unit of time. the fact that it comes out to be the basic tension in string theory or in, general relativity, the force that is the conversion factor between spacetime curvature and the energy density giving rise to it or, if multiplied by the fourth power of the (dimensionless) circular orbit speed some distance from a central body that it tells what the body would weigh at that distance, all these are fine and good, but they are the result of working out hypothesized physics problems, they are not the definition. what if you worked out some other basic physics problem (say the basic tension of a string) and it came out to be 2 FP? or 4 π FP? would you say that the force solutions to such are the definition of the Planck force? it doesn't matter what the system of units are, once you have those 5 base units defined, there is no freedom left to define the others. their definitions are purely consequential. i think you need to word things according to the most common terminology. i fixed it a little more. i inserted edit notes (invisible) that ask what does it mean to ""distribute energy over a gravitational radius""? and what does it mean to ""distribute energy over the Compton wavelength""? unless you expect your encylopediac readers to know, even vaguely, when or where or how or why such distribution of energy is being done (thus defining the rate of such distribution), why say these words? also, there still is no citation other than Schwartzchild radius, which i did. so a reader does not think that this was all just made up, you might want to include references to other stuff. i fixed the convention errors and format errors (some just now). do a diff comparison to see what i did. " +18:16, 16 October 2006 +according to the foreign minister of iran 40% of the iranian people speak turkish! so you are right, first it is one and the same language secondly the stats given in this article are not correct. here is where the minister says it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc9WJ9U2uHo +You always seemed uniquely unsuited to the responsibilities and self discipline require of those entrusted with power. Capricious, imperious, self-serving. Undoubtedly all that. That you continues to rail against Arbcom without even a hint of contrition underlines this. The decision was fair and just, Wikipedia is both better and stronger for it. An RFA would however allow you to appeal and overturn the decision through the vehicle of community consensus, but I don't believe your likely to test your hypothesis regarding ArbCom. 99.141.246.60 +There is no criticisms here and the article is so biased that it is laughable. Both sides of the story should be presented, and not just a pro-christian viewpoint. +Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. +. It's a fairly short article about an American company +Sorry, I don't see any need for the percentages in the infobox as no other articles have them either. I've taken it to the talk page. +" All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL... This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further. MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED. Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177 All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL... This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further. MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED. Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177 All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL... This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further. MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED. Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177 All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL... This ar +or on my talk page on the Strategy wiki +": The first sentence is a description of a Cartesian geometry, not of an ordered pair. An ordered pair of coordinates is an attribute of an object in Cartesian geometry, not the object itself, and certainly not a ""collection"" of such objects. An attempt to improve this muddle was recently 'corrected' with this note: ""distinguished"" was incorrect, both objects can be the same, i.e. indistinguishable. So what? If two coordinates happen to have equal values, they are still distinguished by their function. — " +Contentious on what basis? I do not see it lacking concensus simply because you do not like it, if you cannot make a WP:EL arguement then you are just arguing your feelings, which doesnt stack against concensus based on policies and guidelines. +frankly errant, you're a bit of a dick. ban me from Wikipedia or whatever for saying that, I don't care. +Question and request Hello! I left a question at Talk:Sexual intercourse#Question which I think is for you (I didn't review the whole article history, just the talk page.) I also have a request: In the Nutrition article, someone went through and added [citation needed] tags to essentially all of the unsourced claims, but then someone else googled most if not all of those and found supporting sources that they recorded at Talk:Nutrition#Citation Verification. Could you please look through those and merge in the ones which you think are good sources? I've been looking to do this for a while, but I don't have the biology expertise which I think you do. Thanks for all the work you've been doing. +Giovanni - feel free to delete this person's 'warnings'! +":More to the point, do they need to be here? Sure, they are notable by definition, whether people like that policy or not (plenty do not think that all villages should have a presence, just as plenty think not all high schools should). However, you seem to be suggesting that you are somehow acting on behalf of the villagers, which is an unusual approach. A stub without context (geo data etc) is particularly meaningless and likely to irritate people with a less tolerant attitude, so perhaps doing a little more basic work on each one would go a long way towards placating the situation. You have said that the information is out there, so why not add it yourself? You perhaps need to be more aware that the ""divide"" includes problems with non-Indian editors finding sources, especially with the sometimes confusing (to them) subcontinental naming conventions, transliteration issues etc. Your help in ameliorating this divide would be great. - " +" I can sympathize with your frustration. I know many comic book professionals and I know a lot of things I would love to include in articles but I can't. I am not a linked source that other people can double-check. Your conversation with Heck is useful in that you can let it guide you as you look for sources that you can link as references, but in Wikipedia, a personal conversation is not an appropriate source for citation. @SUPERHEROLOGIST " +Honors i think with the year-by-year we dont need to list being first in the east as an honorespecially since they finished behind everyone in the west but kc. +Such as? I'm just curious. I'm trying to create a SSBB moveset for Haku. +Copyright Violation of use of image within another article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Weirscover.jpg +(You also don't need an accessdate for documents from a dated archive - for obvious reasons). +Adam Beach Why isn't it stated that he's going to play Chester Lake again? I wouldn't care as that name's not catchy, but...?Rocky +Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. \talk 14:08, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC) +thanks for your kind words about my BBC premier today. Us Unites Statesians won't see it for a month or two, and I am curious as to what footage they used. I really want to know if any of the music segments they filmed were edited in because all my band mates had to sign Release Forms and they are curious as to exactly what they released. Life is good. Einar aka +article Nikki patel I have added an infobox to the article Nikki Patel. As you can see, it needs to have references. So can you tell me all the websites or books you got this information from and type all of this on my talk page by clicking on the follwing link. thanks. +Trick Deck I replied to you here. The gist of it is that removal of magical secrets is something that was long debated, but the overall consensus was that sourced, relevant, material should not be removed even if it irritates certain profesionals. +If only. The onus on us all is to assume good faith. You are not doing so with me. Interestingly, according to the AGF guidelines, to accuse another of not A'ingGF can be an instance of not A'ingGF itself. But you really have not done so. Why is that? +" Need your help, seriously I recently voted to help you in your RFA, and now I need your help. I've been accused of being a so-called ""sockpuppet"" (alias account) and I requested to be unblocked and this user " +I am not sure if this comment is considered vandalism or not (it should be, in my opinion), but if you're just going to post garbage you should keep it within your own talkpage, instead of flaunting your stupidity accross Wikipedia and furthering the cause of groups like Prussian Blue by giving them the appearance of having intelligence in contrast to their opposition's constant use of personal attacks, POV, vandalism, and utter stupidity. +PR, I think your proposed edit is not seriously disputed, and it should be fine to put it in. +sajad selena i have good sound as you.but my country is iran and inside my country is not reader english. we can good reader................2.180.4.154 +Why have I been blocked? I haven't personally attacked anyone. On the contrary, I was attempting to resolve a dispute. +NY approval the school now have NY approval. ok. +You know... Beeblebrox, you really need to learn to chill. It's not like other peoples' opinions are going to disappear, just because you're Grand Poobah or something. 68.240.150.91 +" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar Your vandalism is simply top notch! Keep it up! " +I have requested permission to use some photographs from the German Pinscher club website and am waiting on a response. +The last section does appear to be almost promotional, not too sure about the remainder. Are there any particular parts you object to, or could use an example of another band entry as a better example how it should be written? +Contested deletion Shaft Animation Studio is a premier animation training company, Offers World class training services in Animation, VFX & Game Development. With cutting-edge technology, cultural compatibility, solid management & industry experience with the cost advantages, we are ISO 9001-2000 certified college for Computer Graphics & Animation, established in 2001 with an aim of provided high quality computer graphic education, in Multimedia, Graphic & Web Designing, 2D, 3D Animation, VFX, SFX & Game Art Designing. We are here with a strong zeal and motivation which has been spreading with any technology break through. +Hi Hi Husky. Just to let you know, This is actually Xiphon speaking, but I am logged out because for some reason I can't access my talk page when I'm logged in at the moment. I see you're sending anti-vandalism messages to the IP that I am using, Ipod's or something, please note that I am not vandalising anything, I assume it's someone else on this IP. I'm trying to ask an admin about my talk page issue, so please don't block this IP for the time being. If you could just aknowledge here, not my talk page for obvious reasons, I'd be grateful. Thanks +article! ) please visit my page. AJEJEJE micahandreadeleon +"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Antique Rose — Drop me a line " +Listen Cuntboy You're just a fag from north of the border. Don't know jack about the NEvada DOC. I fucked your wife asshole +" Advice Learn how to read English. TalkContributions " +The the graphic would be fine pending removal of the extra line? +Talkback Not to mention the requests here for responses, which you've just deleted. (t•c) +" Regarding the PBS program, even though Ruse sounds hopelessly muddled, it doesn't support the whole statement you make, according to this transcript, and isn't a very good source for scholarly third party analysis of ID. Meyer is quoted as saying ""You understand, Ben, that we have no problem with the ancient chronology of the earth...(Unintelligeble) Creationism is not our position."" which would tie in with him saying that YEC isn't their position, but as Intelligent design movement#The 'big tent' strategy shows, their position has always been to replace ""materialist science"" with ""theistic science"" first, and in the meantime to agree to differ about aspects like the age of the Earth. Nelson continues to be a prominent ID proponent, featuring along with Meyer at a 2007 symposium and turning up to support ID at meetings in February 2009 and November 2009. Still promoting ID and YEC side by side. Some of their arguments may seem logically incompatible, but ID has always included such contradictions. . . , talk " +i want to know why you delted my page. It took me a long time to write all of that and the excuse you gave was b.s. If you had taken the time to actually read the article you would see that person is a famous musician. +" Genre This ethereal nonsense has to stop. Side-Line and the other ref clearly use ""ethereal"" as a descriptive adjective (cf. ""dream-like"", ""atmospheric"" etc.). It has nothing to do with Ethereal wave as a musical genre, which is an offshoot of Gothic ROCK." +re List of office bearers of the National Union of Students of Australia WP:USERFY - Userfied the page, now located at ''' +Keep your head up man Don't let this uppity bitch get you down man, you are one of the better contributors to this shit. +Absolute bollocks. The source is the London Evening Standard. +Good to see you again after your barnstar. +further harassment from Jance/Jgwlaw Jance is now reverting edits for the sake of reverting my edits. +Don't even speak of incivility McJeff, the RFC outside view proved you were to blame as well. I know you wont admit it, but the diffs show it clearly. You aren't a perfect editor, so you probably shouldn't even posting in the discussions. Your view is clear, you want me punished no matter what (ever since the RFC). That is a poor attitude to have. Anyway, I agree to let go of the rescue tag issue, but the rest I stand by. +" Thanks again , the mid-19th century embellishing has been sort of attributed to John Elkington Gill, but that seems to be based on no more the fact that he worked on the nearby parish church. My guess if that looking at the architecture, Raikes Davy designed it himself and probably got a surveyor or perhaps even Gill to draw up some working plans. I'll keep searching. If there's any clues, they are in that strange tower, which is why I likened it to the work of Alexander Thomson, but that's more for explaining to readers the ideas and architectural concepts that were floating about at that time, rather than suggesting he designed it - it's not accomplished enough for him anyway. (talk) " +" Speedy deletion of Jackie Van Horn A tag has been placed on Jackie Van Horn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, ""See also"" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +" Eminem is Back Eminem released an album in 2004 entitled, ""Eminem is Back"". Eminem Is Back is an official album but it wasn't released by Eminem's label so they released it without his permission. (http://www.mp3.com/albums/648659/summary.html), (http://artists.letssingit.com/eminem-album-eminem-is-back-tgbspf). How many other albums are out there than Eminem produced but isn't listed in wikipedia? I'm starting the page, its track list will be there as well. " +REDIRECT Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Kajol +2006 (UTC) Hi Jorgenumata. I liked all the additions you have made. I myself have worked in metals on the physics side, so I can add some things. But actually, for the overall structure, I think it would be useful to discuss some of the ways that MD is used in different fields on the talk page so that we can incorporate the different uses of MD more fully. Most people are focused on their on field, and don't see outside it (me included), so it is kind of hard to incorporate all the different things into one article. The merge discussion with MM is an example. Metals cannot be modelled by force fields. They are completely incompatible with the force field view of molecules, and from reading the MM page, MM only uses force fields. So it seems impossible to merge the articles. Anyway, enoough of my blabbing. The things that I am interested in knowing are what/how MD is used in different fields. Fluid/aerodynamics: Do fluid dynamics / aerodynamics people use the billiard-ball approximation of atoms to model fluids, and are these methods considered molecular dynamics if they consider each atom individually? Metals: We don't use force fields. Generally, TBSMA or equivalent is the least accurate/most empirical that can be used. Tight-binding and ab initio are far more common. Anyway, I can add a lot of metals things myself, so don't need much input here. Semiconductors: Again, force fields are not used. However, requires very different approximations to metal simulations. Again, I can add stuff to the article on these. Chemists: What exactly do chemists study? Are the chemical reactions always studied within a solvent, or are they studied on isolated chemical compounds? Is it always important to correctly model the temperature and pressure, or are these secondary considerations in chemical MD simulations? Bio: Similar to chemistry, are temperature and pressure important? Do proteins get modelled within the context of a solvent, or are conformations studied on the basis of a single protein molecule with no external interactions? So, I'll try to add some metals and semiconductor things to the article, but I don't want to break the chem/bio side. Will come back in maybe a week and try to do some additions. 09:09, 21 November +my campers favourite order from least favourite to favourite 22 Geoff - this guy annoys me and is too much of a laid back freak 21 Justin - this guy gets on my nerves because he thinks he's so hot and can control ladies and stuff like thst 20 Heather - she was very rude, manipulative and backstabbing in TDI, which is her main reason of being near the bottom on my rankings 19 Owen - this overweight guy, was chosen to win over Gwen! he can be somewhat funny, but is annoying and doesn't deserve to have a place in TDA. 18 Beth - she is okay at times, but wasn't a person that deserved a place in TDA. 17 Leshawna - i liked her in TDI, but she has became a very rude, selfish jerk in TDA. 16 Sadie - She can get very funny at times, but it bugged me when this overweight person was choosen to stay over Katie. 15 Ezekiel - if he got more air time, he probably would have been higher on this chart, but was funny and mean at times. 14 Duncan - he is an amazing person when Courtney's in the game, but is rather boring and mean without her. 13 Izzy - this crazy psycopath was really fun in TDI, but has constantly returning in TDA, which ius rather annoying as DJ hasn't returned yet. 12.5 Mr. Coconut - it wasn't really a competitor, but was my second choice in the top 5 to win, other than Gwen. 12 Noah - he is a very funny guy, but can be lazy and selfish at times. 11 Eva - she is a very furious competitor (which was actually her downfall) and deserved another chance at the $ 1 000 000. 10 Harold - this is a very funny and talented guy. though he doesn't have many friends, he's a good person to have as a friend. 9 Bridgette - she was one of my favourite's in TDI by being a good player, but has dropped because of her lousy effort on TDA. 8 Tyler - even though he didn't make it far, his self determenation and courage is what makes a mgood person to han around. 7 Lindsay - Lindsay's kills, such as forgetting names, betraying enemies and having a very girlish attitude are what makes her funny. 6 Gwen - i like her relationship with Trent and her attitude towards everyone. she had the skills to win TDI, but lost over brownies. 5 Trent - when Trent is mysterious i like his attitude. his relationship with Gwen is by far my favourite. 4 Courtney - she has a very strict attitude, which i like and also i like how she started the relationship with Duncan. 3 Cody - i like him because of his cool personality and what he does to try to get Gwen's attention. Ples, he started the Gwen & Trent relationship. 2 Katie - she is very funny, especially when she has those fights with Sadi, but it was a sign of racism as she was voted off over overweight, untalented Sadie. 1 DJ - DJ is very caring and nice to everyone. Both his eliminations were not fair and heartbreaking (my point is he should return). +" ""Not much of an editor at this point..."" - Everyone pretty much celebrated upon hearing this news." +Hey Tam la sham! Here are your words suggesting deletion of this page: Perhaps this thread should be retired. Each unaddressed issue may be restated succinctly in a new thread (that is, in a new section). AuthorityTam (talk) 05:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC +" I won!!! I won your competition! whadda i get, whadda i get? I've seen your name up a lot while reverting vandalism. Keep up the great work! Merry christmas and have a brilliant new year! |  talk  " +Thanks Tony1 for your comment on my talk page about overlinking on the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cascavel&diff;=next&oldid;=586154280). I see what you're saying about overlinking to dates. I had been translating the document from the Brazilian Portuguese version to English and simply copied the original article's linking pattern. It seems they may have different standards on the Portuguese version. So in the future when I translate over a document from PT>EN, I'll strip out those extraneous links. Cheers! +Hi, this is syed ahdi hussain naqvi page. +Bullshit What the fuck are you annoying my edits on Wikipedia? Such a bullshit you're bitch! Wikipedia is free to everyone for edit asshole!! (anonymous) 06:30 28 February 2015 (UTC) +" Location Are you here on campus? (I'm in the 1st-floor computer lab, as usual.) | Talk " +There is no logic, it all stems from nationalistic bias and mob rule +(not standard miles) +if I try to block evade +" Request clarification In the first paragraph of the introduction, it says ""Despite the scale of the alert, the WHO stated on April 29 that the majority of people infected with the virus make a full recovery without need of medical attention or antiviral drugs."" ""with the virus make a full recovery"" doesn't make sense; does it mean ""with the virus will make"" or ""with the virus have made""? I checked the cited source, but it didn't clarify from what I could tell. " +" Yeah I know deary me we can't trust you journalist types any more can we? Lord Leveson ring any bells or how about the ""phone hacking scandal"". Cretin!" +"::Thanks for your explanation and self-justifications. One small correction; I did not suggest that you (or we) recuse from anything, I asked you to clarify whether you included yourself in the call to pull back from certain unspecified areas of Wikipedia. I will take it that you do not. Re ""some admins who I have previously respected""; I'll be up front and admit I have lost a lot of respect for you over this matter and your ways of dealing with it. However, I now consider the matter closed and I agree with the conclusion you make above, although not with much of the rest of what you have said. All the best, " +" Luis Miguel Gallego Basteri I would consider your move from Luis Miguel to Luis Miguel Gallego Basteri as a highly controversial renaming of an article. Please do not take offense, but I am positive that you are not familiar with this topic, or Spanish culture in general. Here are my thoughts on this: Luis Miguel is a singer of worldwide fame and much more notable than the other four Luis Miguels that you included in that disambiguation list. Luis Miguel is much more of a public figure than any other Luis Miguel, since he is a Grammy winner and is often romantically associated with big stars, such as Mariah Carey, Daisy Fuentes, etc. Please also note that ""Luis Miguel"" is his professional name, and that is why he is notable, he is not a scientist or politician or any other profession where a full name is used. Also only one of the other Luis Miguels has an article, therefore people looking for ""Luis Miguel"" will be taken to that disambig page while almost all of them will be looking for the singer and not anybody else. In addition, none of the other Luis Miguels go by ""Luis Miguel"" only the singer. I will strongly suggest you moved the page back to Luis Miguel and create another Luis Miguel (disambiguation) page. Respectully, " +Would you mind telling me why? It would help me understand a few things, probably. +In antiquity, Greeks used this term to refer to foreigners. +It should definitely not be included in the article. As noted above, it was a very childish word used to describe the console, and it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article, and that is coming from a lifelong PlayStation fan. +I have, look in the article +" BTW, Jones is also known for his research into Jesus' supposed visits to North America. . █♣█ ▪ Talk " +and gets bummed by Burner0718 +OH MY FUCKING GOD THEY BLOKED ME WHAT IM GONNA DO WITH MY OTHER 10 WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNTS ( +Sick POV What the hell? User:Izady is a sick fuck: It should be noted that the conditions in which individuals died varies from site to site. The people that were buried in these graves are believed to have been members of the Kurdish population which was in support of Iranian occupancy of Iraq at the time of their death (circa 1980's) 'and who deserved to die in the hands of patriotic Sunni Arabs of Iraq'. The legitimacy of claims of atrocity are debateable for this reason, 'since Sunni Arabs are too honorable to do any such things'. The distinction between those who have died in military style combat or executed under the direction of a lawful court of President Saddam Hussein, although buried disrespectfully, and those who have been victims of genocide, ethnic cleansing or otherwise murdered innocently and buried efficiently is a bright line; mass burial should not be assumed to be evidence of criminal activity. 'These Shia and Kurds were traitors to Iraq and were fairly tried and executed by the patriot Arab Sunnis for their crimes', although the burial was not always respectful. Victims of chemical weapons are unknown, 'and they too were traitor Kurds and deserved the punishment by the patriotic Saddam government'. +As spoken in.... (don't mention the States!) You know, there are plenty of comical sights on Wikipedia, many of them driven by POV pushing, but the contorted use of regions rather than countries to avoid noting that Spanish is spoken by many citizens of the United States is among the most hilarious. Well, if you insist on doing that, you cannot say Spain, but must parallel region for region. The same goes for Mexico. This is, of course, ridiculous, but shrug that's the way it goes. +I have entered the tale at Wiki Source as you suggested, but how do I now make the article relevant to Wikipedia? Regards +You misspelled 'speech' I though that I should correct you, seeing that you are an administrator and all. +" Lisa Christians not only don't believe God has parts, they state it in numerous creeds and theological texts. The citations do NOT say that God has parts. Nor do they say that Jesus is ONLY divine. To state ""Jesus is part of the Trinity"" is both docetist and tritheist, and is NOT stated in the citations. You have a vested interest in presenting Christianity in a way that is explicitly rejected by its own adherents. Stick with the citations, don't synthesize, and you'll be okay. " +Alistair, the beagle remark was not intended to be just a joke. It applies to this discussion in several ways. The main one is that this bickering about the primacy of men, inevitable or not, is often seen as part of the chase or even terms of endearment. But if you substitute the word beagles for women, one might be compelled to ask, 'What did beagles ever do to you?' This queston is never posed in the human gender wars, I think because the atmosphere is too charged. Hammy +" This is an excellent article and a valid subject and deleting it is an absurd idea. There are many sources that support the validity of an article on Military Kids as an identifiable subculture 1) See the award-winning book by Mary Edwards Wertsch: ""Military Brats: Legacies of Childhood Inside the Fortress"" 2) See the award-winning documentary: ""Brats: Our Journey Home"" by Dona Musil (it won 19 awards). 3) See numerous novels released in the last several years on the Military Brat experience. 4) See the Oscar Nominated movie ""The Great Santini"" based on the book by the same name by Pat Conroy. No one of these works alone could represent the whole military brat experience but they altogether point to the existence of a huge identifiable sub-culture commonly known as ""Military Brats"". Invisible No More! ==" +Thanks Thanks for correcting the mistake that I made on projection (linear algebra). +Deletion review sockpuppet question A deletion review doesn't quite seem like the place to discuss whether or not I've had another accounts but, yeah, I've had more than one account, though I've never used them to support or even interact with each other and so I don't believe I violate the sockpuppet policy. Love, (t) +":Re: ""there are plenty of sites and books falsely placing him in Louisville at birth"", I don't see where you have established definitively that Birmingham is the birthplace. What is convincing you to be so certain he wasn't born in Louisville? I don't see it. I think it would be best if we remove our biases and try to look at this in a fact-based manner. I'm not making this an edit war to keep Louisville there but with so many sources saying 'Louisville', it would be irresponsible for me to drop this. Talk • Work " +Thanks VoiceOfAll. May I also reiterate we're not debating that some people (external sources) make an Engram link - we're saying that common NLP books and trainings just don't refer to Engrams. We know of the one NLP book (ABC of NLP), and no big NLP-name authors (bandler/grinder/dilts/andreas etc). JP also mentioned having 2 sources. Thanks +Italian Fascism anyone? What if we carved out a chunk of Gennarous's section on Italian Fascism on the Fascism page and re-created the Italian Fascism page? Then you could take a crack at expanding it? The section is well-written (and has cites), but the Fascism page is already way too long. Please consider this an olive branch (and not a bundle of sticks). +Maybe something useful for you as an Albanian football lover a short list: Riza Lushta Naim Krieziu Sllave Llambi Loro Boriçi It may must be expanded because they where one of the first and most sucesfull trasfers of Albania. +bristol bristol has never been in somerset mate,it was gloucestershire, avon and now is a county in it's own right,look it up if you dont believe me.I won't have a f**king yank telling me where i live. +Well maybe not, but forgetting to sign my posting on your talk page is a wiki school boy error!!!, and thanks very much for the star - a strange experience, I must be getting all old and sentimental as I feel a bit humbled by it all ...! +Get the facts straight 2 http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2002/01/08/tem_the_jazz_bird_fact.html Tuesday, January 08, 2002 The Jazz Bird: Fact vs. fiction ________________________________________ Craig Holden's novel The Jazz Bird, is based on the 1927 murder trial of Cincinnati bootlegger George Remus. Here's a quick look at where fact and fiction converge and diverge: George Remus, the killer Fiction: A lawyer and pharmacist who comes to Cincinnati from Chicago in the 1920s with a scheme that makes him at least $20 million. He buys distilleries licensed to sell “medicinal” whiskey to drug companies and then sells the booze to dummy drug companies while shipping it to illegal customers. Truth: A lawyer and pharmacist, he was a friend and co-counsel of famed defense lawyer Clarence Darrow. Mr. Darrow testified as a character witness for him at his trial. He came to Cincinnati from Chicago and turned a $10,000 investment into an estimated $80 million fortune in less than three years. He sold “medicinal” whiskey to legitimate drug companies he set up, then stole the whiskey from the drug companies. Charlie P. Taft, the prosecutor Fiction: He is the son of former United States President William Howard Taft and plans a career in politics. He fades away after losing the case. Truth: He was the youngest son of the former president. He became Hamilton County prosecutor just a few months before the trial. His political career suffered a setback after the trial — he wasn't nominated for a second term as prosecutor. He did stay in politics, helping found the Cincinnati Charter Committee and serving as a councilman and mayor until his retirement almost 50 years later. He ran an unsuccessful race as a Republican for Ohio governor in 1952, the year George Remus died. Imogene Remus, the victim Fiction: She is the wealthy 25-year-old daughter of a high society family in Cincinnati. She is the wife of a World War I veteran left in a coma by a shell fragment when she meets George Remus. She tries, unsuccessfully to get Remus accepted by Cincinnati society. Truth: She was a 35-year-old secretary in Chicago when she divorced her first husband to marry George Remus, who divorced his first wife to marry her. She entertained lavishly in Cincinnati in hopes of being accepted into Cincinnati society. The Cincinnati upper crust was willing to buy Mr. Remus' whiskey, but never accepted him, or his wife, as social equals. She was 39 when she was killed. The trial Fiction: George Remus defends himself, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. He plays to the press and frequently disrupts the proceedings, which are likened to a Vaudeville show by the Enquirer. The jury acquits him in 20 minutes, recommends his release from the hospital in time for Christmas and drinks up at a party he throws for them. Truth: That's all true. http://www.enquirer.com/bearcats/2002/03/30/uc_logan_duked_out_for.html Saturday, March 30, 2002 Logan duked out for AP honor ________________________________________ The Associated Press ATLANTA — UC's Steve Logan was third behind Duke's Jason Williams and Kansas' Drew Gooden in voting for The Associated Press college basketball player of the year. UC's Bob Huggins was fifth in voting for coach of the year. Logan received eight votes, Williams 38 and Gooden 18 from the 72-member national panel that selects the weekly AP Top 25. Huggins got 7 votes behind Pittsburgh's Ben Howland (16), Bob Knight of Texas Tech (11), Ernie Kent of Oregon (10) and Roy Williams of Kansas (9). Williams, the only unanimous All-America selection this season, is the second straight Duke player to be selected national player of year and the fifth Blue Devil to win the Adolph Rupp Award. Shane Battier won last season. The other Duke players to be honored were Elton Brand in 1999, Christian Laettner in 1992 and Art Heyman in 1963. Williams thanked his coach, Mike Krzyzewski, who missed the ceremony after undergoing hip replacement surgery on Wednesday. “Being with Coach K the past three years is the best thing I could have ever asked for,” Williams said. “I owe him everything.” Williams, a junior also voted to the All-America team as a sophomore, averaged 21.3 points, 3.5 rebounds and 5.3 assists for the defending champion Blue Devils (31-4), ranked No. 1 for all but four weeks this season. He shot 45.7 percent from the field, including 38.3 percent from 3-point range. Howland led the Panthers (29-6) to the most victories in school history, their first appearance +I am genuinely interested in why you are so bad, if that hurt your precious little feelings then TOUGH ) +" Modification of Info box Rajus belong to Hinduism & vaishnava sect according to Thurston and many other sources above said that. They are a forward caste according to overseas development institute which is stated in srinivasulu. Populated states & Languages is according to anthropolgical sources of Kumar Suresh Singh.Even Thurston never said that Rajus are confined only to Andhra Pradesh. ""Gotras"": coming to gotras that Joshua Jonathan said they are acceptable in his examination.So,it will be better that if he only adds them in this page than any other person. These modifications doesn't damage the neutrality as the same justice should be done to this infobox which was done to kapu,kamma & reddy info boxes.Please kindly understand and don't revert them by stating any unjustifiable reasons.Because as the editor always say other stuff exists & no dead line.I hope editors understand. -abcde " +You don't give a reason for why this shouldn't be deleted, but userpages are not for promotional materials unrelated to Wikipedia. +" Because it might fall under ""original research"". Sorry for the belated reply and thank you for your comments. " +" I note that people on here just got Wikid77 blocked for three months because he allegedly communicated behind closed doors, called ""canvassing."" Why isn't re-writing a whole article just with a group of people who all agree with each other, with no clear notice to the public what is going on or where this draft is located, or how they can participate, even worse? This sure looks worse to me, like some sort of Tag Team situation, even if it isn't exactly canvassing. I don't see why it is okay for a group to plan to remove a whole article behind closed doors, while what he did is so egregious you wanted him blocked for three months. In my opinion, this attempted re-write behind closed doors violates Wikipedia policy on openness. That is all I am going to say for now at this level. Have a nice day. " +Oh, do I need to say again? 88.104.31.21 +Undeletion request Hi, could I please ask you to undelete Israelinsider? I've been mentoring a new user, and encouraging him to create stubs. That was his first start, and it got deleted within one minute of creation. Can we please give him more time to flesh it out? Thanks, onka +May 2006 (UTC) Hello Visvia, long time no see. For the record, I do love Korea very much and I am engaged to a lovely korean girl. I am not in Korea right now and have not been since November 2005. I shall return to the land of the morning calm in September 2006, though. 03:10, 13 +FUCK YOU KID, Get the Fuck out of my country. +It never rains but it pours! -) –– +Putting stupid comments in articles will result in your account being blocked. Please do not do it again. +(talking to the fan) +Heh. I appreciate your being even handed about it. You correctly caught the meaning of that post. I would like to likewise acknowledge that I saw your change to the POV template as being a legitimate attempt to find a compromise position and I commend you for it even though I would have been unlikely to support that specific change. +If you have more to say, put +" Oh that's right! I speedied a few of his nonsense pages last night and the night before. Thanks! XXX '''''' " +Hi again! What is inappropriate? In my native Bari, talking about Breasts is considered an important way to get to know one another. I think he has beautiful breasts, and I was merely commenting on this! 83.71.9.119 +According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation news service, the poster known as +Congratulations! Keep up the good work. Your work is quite commendable. I do mostly fringe notability articles that I hope get to million a year. I'm sowing seeds now that I hope will someday yield a harvest of Million awards. I am eligible for a bunch of quarter millions, but am hoping for the big time (see (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +" Minor rewording is not enough to avoid a copyright violation (see WP:Close paraphrasing), but your new version looks fine. In order to make the references visible, you have to add {{reflist}} at the end under a ""References"" heading - I have done that. Regards, " +you obviously know shit-nothing about physics, if the buildings were colored red by red in the water, the sky reflection wouldn't be so blue, it'd have tinted purple. +Feel free. Go through Wikipedia and tackle every assertion made without evidence. Also, tell the guys who check the Millwall and West Ham pages that their rivalry isn't bitter. You may have a job on your hands. But two wrongs don't make a right as my old Yiddisher mum says. Like I say, no problem. Best ... +Entailment → — I have no idea why Philogo preferred to merge everything into entailment when the prevailing view in the literature is that inference, entailment, and implication are all forms of Logical consequence. This is evident in the titles of journal articles, chapters of books, etcetera. Let fix this consistent with the category structure. (talk) +the entire human race is quite impressive +Wikipedia:Don't feed the divas +"It porobably helped that Wayne had lung cancer while filming ""In Harm's Way"", which contributed to his somewhat subdued performance. " +I still operate in that bizarre subset of the world where actions speak stronger than words. Deleting content is the work of a true asshole. Calling someone an asshole in a talk page is just an observation. Further, 99% of wikipedia lacks citation and is not encyclopedic. Saying that it is not relevant to the article is grand, but you yourself admitted that there would be an article where it would be appropriate. Therefore, move it to that article, or accept the status quo. You don't go around deleting stuff just because you're too lazy to do what you have already admitted the right thing is unless you are, you guessed it, an asshole. +In you read the sentences, Eric, you would see that the first sentence includes the words in ages. The second one talks historically, not about recently. 21:55, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC) +It's a fuzzy set. It's not black and white, and nobody thinks it is. It's a strawman argument. +Whats up? As I advised your boy stevebaker, you can both kiss my ass, right cheek, left cheek and dead center, ill even give you a half hour to draw a crowd...Harry Swoger... +I don't see computers in common jewelry or clothing, but I think technology to do this has been developed, it just has not been taken up commercially on a mass scale yet. Do iPods and iPhones and wristwatches count as jewelry or clothing? I say no. Though we sort of wear these things. Perhaps when clothing and jewelry 2.0 comes about we will stop calling it jewelry or clothing, perhaps we will call them body suits, or armour, and talismans or well, not sure about that.... When will we stop calling iPhones phones, and call them computers? (Remember computers were the size of buildings just a while ago) 123.2.171.189 +The 2004 section should not be merged with a page that is about an original muscle car. The two types of cars are far too apart in both time period and style that they should not be in the same article. +So MediaTech, just because America had more troops and equipment you think that reinforces North America over Oceania? I'm with Crzyclarks on this, it isn't about the contribution but the conflicts in those regions and Oceania had a hell of a lot more fighting than North America. +It happened cause you sir are an idiot. Kayaking duh go drown yourself while you are at it. You hide behind a keyboard and your own hitler like rules. jump off a cliff for your next feat. +" You are welcome to respond here. I don't see any response, though, am I missing something? – talk • contribs " +I suggest to you, Dori , that you give it up,youre an idiot +Re New unreviewed article/Darren Farris Ok. I put one too many slashes on the MTV link. However, the information I got from that site and references 5 and 6 are redundant. As the other articles that you have so VERY graciously cited for me contain the used information. I just remove those 3 references since they are redundant and just back up other sources. ) +No, this is not my cat, I don't have any pets as can be seen from - already archived - discussions). You have removed my response in effort to continue with your attacks. That's vandalism. You have also attempted to remove one of your strawman arguments from your previous posts in attempt to twist the debate. You disregard requests to leave the decisions on majority vote and blatantly keep forcing your snapshot upon the page. Furthermore, you disregard warnings and requests to stop vandalizing the page until the consensus is met. You have not offered anything else but repeat vandalism out of sheer spite on wikipedia. If you continue vandalizing this page, you will be reported. +Velikovsky History and astromony are not inaccurate. Please do not vandalize the edits of other members. +" Support Dcooper's suggestion talk " +" As per your request, i have tried to provide quotes. Please check. Speak " +stop pretending as if you are the owner of that content, it will be shame among the shame. +Welcome to Wikipedia. However your edits to Emirates Stadium are vandalism and have been removed. +I have tried to adress that problem now, and I think it works quite well except that it has a premature ending. Who is to get the final word, and what would it be? +" Filet-O-Fish VladDroid256 has given you a McDonald's Filet-O-Fish sandwich! Filet-O-Fish sandwiches are very popular during Lent and promote WikiLove. Hopefully, this one has added flavor to your day! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Filet-O-Fish sandwich, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the fishy, gooey goodness of Filet-O-Fish sandwiches by adding to someone's talk page with a friendly message!" +Template:Did you know nominations/Clark (mascot) I am reminding you that Template:Did you know nominations/Clark (mascot) is an April fools nomination and needs a final review. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) +Gilmore Girls I'm trying to figure out a few things when adding Season 7 and Complete Series. I somehow added an extra square and don't know how to undo it and I'm still trying to figure out background colours. Can you take a look and tell me how I can fix it? I don't want you to fix it until I give it a shot. Thanks +" Jimbo... I hope you'll take this as it's meantthat is, without too much rancorbut I think it's time for you to put up or shut up. I think the problem that (at least some) people are having with your issues with Eric is that, while you're talking about it, you're not actually doing anything about it. If you think Eric should be banned, don't just snark about it on your talk page: actually start a ban discussion on AN, or Arbcom case request, or whatever you think should be done. Because right now, at least from where I'm sitting, all it looks like is that you just want to take potshots at him from the sidelines (and, until this ANI thread, in a place where you forbade him from responding, which is hardly an open discussion), and you don't actually care about fixing this ""failure of governance"". If you really think this is a problem that needs solving, then it's time to get on your proverbial horse and ride: marshal your various arguments and diffs of evidence and start the discussion in the appropriate place (this talk page ain't it), just like any other editor. Stop talking and start doing. oh, and if you think that ""well, I can't start it because I'm Jimbo, and people will think that Jimbo starting a discussion means it won't be fair to Eric""well, snarking from the sidelines against him isn't much better, so why are you doing that?  ⚇♔ " +Perhaps the block on Lopez has something to do with it. He probably won't be showing if he actually has to justify himself. +" Also, by the way, I don't know what you mean by ""administrative rollback""—I had rollback long before I was an admin. The only admin tool there I used was the block.  talk/contribs " +"Ahoerstemeier|andy]] 17:23, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC) Jesus, pre-4th century Christianity, and syncretism I have added a comment on the VfD page. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jesus, pre-4th century Christianity, and syncretism#Discussion about the merge. If I could find out which bits to merge, I'd be very grateful for feedback! - 11:56, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) That was a pretty horrible thing you said you know. Did you actually bother to investigate CheeseDreams? did you check her ArbCom cases? Did you check how she deliberately and spitefully vandalised my user page? Did you bother to read any of the things I wrote? Where do you get off saying I enjoyed having CheeseDreams banned? I didn't do that: CD did that via her editing practices and disruption of Wikipedia. - 15:19, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) Say what?! Look mate, I'm disputing the article, not CheeseDreams. The article is an essay written from an assumption (and in fact pretty much stated as ""fact"") that Jesus was the ""new sycretism"". This is, to put it frankly, quite far from the truth and though the info should be stated that such and such stated such and such, there should not be an entire article, especially one like CheeseDreams created. Why do you think I'm not opposing that a merge be done? Sheesh. You'd think I'm trying to destroy CheeseDreams life works or something. - 15:47, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) I would NPOV the article if I could. I can't. Why? Because the material isn't reference properly. Incidently, don't hold your breath for CheeseDreams to come back. She posted her password to a known trolls page and forced another admin to log in to her account quickly and change the password. She no longer has access to her account! In fact, we found 5 verified sock puppets of CheeseDreams (all with the same password) and she no longer has access to these accounts. You might want to note that I did start adding material: I have created an article The Two Babylons, which I encourage you to help me make more complete (I've only done the first two sections - and not even that). In the process I edited the article to clear up some misconceptions of CheeseDreams (like for instance she called Alexander Hislop a ""scholar"", which he most certainly wasn't). However, I'm not sure how much time I have for you. I'm a little confused personally. The other day I was accused by a Stormfront member of being a traitor to the white race and/or a Jew, however today you tell me I'm a Nazi. Would you people please make up your minds? I'm getting mighty confused. - 17:20, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) Personal attacks I mentioned it before, now I'll say it here. Please do not make personal attacks on your fellow editors. This includes comparing them to Nazis or making other allegations or implications regarding their personal character, as you did recently regarding TBSDY. If your position has merit, you should be able to establish your position on its own merits without resorting to such attacks. Article talk pages are (in general) intended for discussing how best to improve the article. VfD talk pages are for discussing reasons for and against deleting articles. They are not for discussing editors. Also, please don't demand that other editors do your research for you. We all do what we can, we're all thankful for what others can contribute, but that's about as far as it goes. 05:08, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) User is Banned This user has been blocked as being an alias of banner user . 04:12, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC)" +is there any way to note on this page that a trolling attempt to delete the article failed? +REDIRECT Talk:List of FIFA World Cup hat-tricks/Archive1 +Psephos: Adam Carr's Electoral Archive I noticed your note on Rebecca's talk page. For once we agree on something. I think an article on your webpage is a good idea. So I went ahead and started it. +" Well said Thanks for your insightful comment at AE.Makin'Bacon " +" The image was deleted per Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion: ""UE (unencyclopedic) - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia."" Apologies for forgetting to notify you on that issue. Anyway, you can always just link to the diff instead of wasting Wikipedia's server resources. Yes, you can try and take this issue further by following the Wikipedia:Resolving disputes process and the next step is to seek mediation with 2nd Piston Honda. And for your information, this is my first day on the the job as an administrator and I was just following the advice at Wikipedia:Civility#Removing uncivil comments.  ►  " +Whoops! There was DOCUMENTATION for the Samson analogy being well received. And it's very true despite the protestations of GAY MAFIA who try to MANIPULATE wiki articles in order to advance their propaganda machine. I fought these NUTCASES tooth and nail a few years ago only to be GAMED or should I say GAYmed (haha) by them. These liberal LOONS use the rules of Wiki to OSTRACIZE anyone who doesn't share their far left agenda. It turns out that comparing Lonnie to Samson was a compliment and not an attack on a 'dead gay man' as some gay advocate so dramatically (shocked! haha) suggested. Lonnie was NOT gay. He was a normal man who had been raped as a young boy much like Jerry Sandusky raped those little boys in the Penn State shower. This of course led Lonnie to engage in other gay activities despite his better judgement. The man himself did NOT want to practice homosexuality. But because of some GAY pedophile, he had his struggles.65.48.16.58 +I've never added, or had anything to do with spam in my life. Stop lying. You are simply a bully, a liar, and a censor who manipulates and misrepresents Wikipedia rules, in order to impose your politics. +" Why you delete the information about Grigiry Grabovoi? In the article ""Resirrection"" you delete the information about his Teaching how to Resuurrect people and stay Immortal. You call iе ""fringe"". Thousands of people all over the World believe it and there are 3 legal Churches of Grabovoy in the USA. Maybe I don't believe in other religions, which speak about Resurrection, so should I delete all the info about Christianity for example?" +Introduction & the article Hi new poster here, ive been following the article for a few weeks, I have reviewed the external links good and bad and have a few ideas. The controversy that surrounds this organization seems to be based between nichiren shoshu(in japan) and sgi(international) with alot of the groundwork coming from japan where the organizations originated from. After looking around and comparing to the other religions and sects, i propose we seperate the criticisms from each article and make a new article that, most likely, will be a cite war. The benefit is two-fold. First, the articles relating to each sect of buddhism talk about THAT buddhism, what they do, where they came from, etc etc, and not talk about the criticisms that anyone may have about them(similar to the anti-christianity criticism article and others). This is the most NPOV solution i can up with. Also, having a criticisms oriented paragraph in the intoduction seems extremely bias against an organization that promotes culture and peace(i have seen some demonstrations, nothing on a global scale or read about the political party, has anyone btw?) Secondly, in the split article section, the details can come out a little more clearly as they arent presented on the article talking about a buddhist sect, its an article about how the sect is impacting the world. It just seems a bit more accurate. Hopefully i will have a viable solution setup after i do some more reading about editing etc... Thoughts? +" Thank you for checking. I've asked another editor who has more experience dealing with NFCC about this. I'd imagine that the ""source"" links for other files have died over the years, so perhaps some kind of precedent has been established. It might be a good idea to download the image and keep it for safe keep just in case. That way if, by chance, it does end up being deleted, it can be re-created if the source is eventually found. Another idea is to try and find out why it was removed from ""Northcliffe Media"" and figure out if it can be re-added. I was able to find something which looks like a logo on an archived page, but it is quite different from the one you uploaded and I'm not sure if (1) it was even used, and (2) if it is OK to use an archived page for the ""source"". I was also able to find this old page, but still no logo. - " +"|decline=Error: Block ID not found. It may have been unblocked already.  ►  " +Update: Obviously you are coordinating your vandalism with JamesMLane and other partisan soboteurs. Please cease all vandalism or you will be suspended by administrators who I will contact. Thank you, Nicolas Leobold +Beg your pardon? You wrote: I mean, where will it end? Before you know it men will be marrying their own state or something. Or multiple states, and their dogs. Hi, sorry but I haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about... Care to explain? +" |} And a bottle that is as small as a speck of dust. Another bottle of oil for you! You can only drink one sip! " +Vacation Hello, I'm leaving for a vacation to Disney World tomorrow and I will not be able to be on Wikipedia when Cedar Point announces the new roller coaster. Could you move +which is called demiurge or creator God, remember +I can get to it. Research heavy. +Somebody was there ahead of you. Thank. Stan +" Gotcha. You're saying if it went Republican, it did so against the net effects of the Jews. What I'm trying to tie in here is if enough Jews ""defected"" to make the difference e.g. if 80% of Jews going Dem became 60% because [Bush/W. Bush/etc...] had enough appeal. I'm claiming Jews can influence a race not only by going solidly Dem, but also by deciding not to. The article I cited states the amount of time candidates spend on Jews is precisely because they (~20% of them) are swayable. That being the case, narrow Republican victories could also be a result of Jewish response to a candidate. This being the case, 2000 Florida could be a result of Jewish voters if either: (1) enough Jews were attracted to W. Bush to throw the state, (2) the state actually went Democratic by voter intents (again this is possible but contentious, or (3) Jews made the race close enough to require Supreme Court intervention, which is itself a political outcome and has profoundly influenced the voting method there, as well as affected ideas about W. Bush. If any one of these three is possible, we can't discount the effect of the Jewish vote in Florida 2000. " +"] and ): I've had it and am taking this to a page over which you have less sole control. Taking this outside: See new section... Show 'n' Tell A question for It may seem an odd question to WP purists, but considering the importance WP places on reliability of secondary sources, why does WP not require a same or similar vetting process of its editors, particularly those who seem to speak only for themselves? The entire concept of requiring contributors to discuss/argue with a username is absurd in its most basic interpretation. For all I know, I could be spinning my wheels fighting for accuracy with a demented, mind game-playing geek living in inner Mongolia. It is imperative, in my mind, that those who demand respect offer up some sort of evidence, as I have, of their actual ability, credibility, reliability, accountability... their authority to control. If it's required of the sources, it should certainly be required of those who quote them and write about them. Similarly, how do I ""call for consensus?"" Who may be a member and how is each identified? Thanks in advance... : That's the beauty of Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it. That's the point. You have no more authority than any other editor here, regardless of your credentials. Also, anyone can participate when trying to achieve consensus. Just remember: it's not the number of people, but the strength or the arguments that matter. darian " +Amateurs can win professional tournaments (they just don't receive the prize money). +not exactly open minded are you?I have arrived just in time +" The relevant question is: What is ""prohibitive interference""? Namely, do you count the Georgian air defenses as such. " +"Axeman 10 says: I didn't vandalize AC/DC's page, they did perform a song called ""Big Balls"", it was released in 1976, but they did perform it at that concert in 1979, i didn't make an inappropriate edit at all, do you even know anything about AC/DC?? I really don't care, ban me, i've done nothing wrong and i'll just change my IP Address and get a new account if it comes down to it, so just come on and ban me and continue to live in your little fairytale land since apparently it makes you feel more important in life because you're an admin, whoopee. Update from Axeman 10: It wasn't a personal attack on you, Scarian, this is the only way i'm able to reply to your annoying warnings, just ban me already, you pathetic loser, i told you all you need to know, you're just stuck is this sad little fantasyland where everything's overly-politically correct, just ban me already, and stop messaging me, i don't respect you, or any other admin! ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " +" Season 1 or Season 2 MAD is on Season 2 I know that for a fact so can someone please make a new table for Season 2 because even in the promos they said ""A New Season of MAD coming in February"" and last time I checked it was February" +Fire Service Co-Responders hi i know their is not 15 gire services their is 46 i am getting info slowly. +This is your opinion, opinions don't go in articles, facts as they're shown by Marvel goes in the article. There are legitimate examples in the article that he possesses superhuman strength. If you disagree, find something that backs up your position. If Marvel decides one day to do a storyline canon to the 616 reality where Wolverine wakes up with a wife, kids, and a house with a little white picket fence and realizes that all of his adventures have been a dream, then it will go in the article. It wouldn't matter if it made no sense to you or you didn't agree with it or thought it was bad writing. If you feel this strongly about it, take it to the project as a whole. Otherwise, it's going to stay in the article. +REDIRECT User talk:NeonMerlin/archive 2 +EXCUSE ME, but shouldn't you have warned the uploader first? Or is it customary for you to delete images wihout warning? I was the original uploader, and I protest! +I am passing this article. +" I think you are doing a lousy job polluting valid information with complete garbage. So, I will no longer link to the wikipedia Clan Davidson ""article"" and will link to the correct history: ACCORDING to the Highland manuscript believed to be written by one MacLauchlan, bearing the date 1467, and containing an account of the genealogies of Highland clans down to about the year 1450, which was accepted as authoritative by Skene in his Celtic Scotland, and believed to embody the common tradition of its time, the origin of the Davidsons is attributed to a certain Gilliecattan Mhor, chief of Clan Chattan in the time of David I. This personage, it is stated, had two sons, Muirich Mhor and Dhai Dhu. From the former of these was descended Clan Mhuirich or Macpherson, and from the latter Clan Dhai or Davidson. Sir Aeneas Macpherson, the historian of the clan of that name, states that both the Macphersons and the Davidsons were descended from Muirich, parson of Kingussie in the twelfth century. You suck, and this site sucks and your edits are complete crap but I'm sure you feel justified somehow in your pathetic view. Like I said, this page is utter bunk, filled with nothing but false information and I'm done with it because there are plenty of sites out there that actually have legitimate information. Gee, it certainly is funny how I keep getting very distant genetic matches to members of Clan Chattan that are NOT related to the Norman Comyn scum. Cheers." +" Shiotani Teiko. And dozens and dozens more just like it. Hi. You created an article saying, in full: Shiotani Teiko (塩谷定好? しおたに ていこう, 1899 - 1988) was a renowned Japanese photographer. Actually it's Teikō, not Teiko, and according to WP's silly rules we have to ignore his real name of Shiotani Teikō and instead call him Teikō Shiotani. But that's not the main problem, which is that he's described in just about the same way as Kuribayashi Satoshi (栗林慧? くりばやし さとし, born 1939) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or indeed Watanabe Kanendo (渡辺兼人? わたなべ かねんど, born 1947) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or Orihara Kei (折原恵? おりはら けい, born 1948) is a renowned Japanese photographer. And so on and so on and so on. Which all means that somebody looking among Category:Japanese photographers is highly likely to land on a mere substub. I can count on my fingers the people likely to turn a half dozen or so of these substubs into articles. No, on my thumbs: User:Pinkville and myself. But he's busy and I am too. I'd rate the probability that more than half will be converted within a year to more than stubs at well under 1%. It's an interesting ""proof of bot concept"" exercise, but is it good for anything else? Tell you what: I'll match you one for one. You turn two of these into articles; I'll turn two into articles. You turn ten into articles; I'll turn ten into articles. How does that sound? That's a great challenge! You're on. – (talk) (random) OK then. Do tell me when you've done one, as I can't keep the whole damn lot on my watchlist. Well actually I can, but I lack the time and effort to put them onto my watchlist. Also, I'll be intercoursingly busy during the next month, so in the short/medium term I may only be able to match you up to ten. I'm sure I've got entire books by at least twenty of these substubbed people, so I ought to be able to do more. What's odd about the list are some conspicuous absences. (Not just people I think are good, but people who, rightly or wrongly, are celebrated and successful.) Asai Shinpei is one, and there are more though I can't think of them right now. Not that it's any of my business, really, but did you scarf the list from User:20th Century Art (Zenhan)'s page, or do something else? Yeah, I scraped from Zenhan. I'll let you know here, or on your talk page, when I have one ready. I don't think I can make any of them featured, but legitimately ""non-stub"" is the goal. All the best, – (talk) (random) Okay, here's my first. Ichiki Shiro. It's not much beyond a stub, but it's something. (It took an hour of research, and I think I found all the info that's anywhere on the web regarding Mr. Ichiki.) By the way, was I right in listing him as a Hatamoto? My sources say he was a retainer of the Daimyo (in the Edo period, of course), and I know that he spoke with his Daimyo, so he couldn't have been a Gokenin. But I don't think he was a warrior, so I don't know. So far as I can tell, all Togugawa retainers were either Gokenin or Hatamoto. Am I correct in my inference? – (talk) (random) Damn you're fast. Unfortunately I don't know squat about Tokugawa retainers and the like. On several occasions I've tried to interest myself in feudal history but have always fallen flat. I suppose I can't separate it from the hammily acted, cheesily lit TV period dramas I sometimes have to tolerate when at the in-laws'. LordAmeth might know. (And this photographer's right up Pinkville's street.) How's this for a progress indicator? Great! – (talk) (random) Yup, except for a number of factors, one of which is that it's problematical copyrightwise (or so I infer from a comment elsewhere by one User:Quadell). I've already chucked in one extra list, and I'll certainly add one more, and I may add one after that; perhaps it can then be described as an original creation. All this is delaying my editing of any article. Still, I'll get around to that too in time. I hope that I've no +Not a misspelling... Both are fine. 218.159.144.49 +" The efforts by Elonka, et. al., to ratify this laughable whitewash of an article are just ludicrous. There is utterly nothing ""neutral"" about what Wikipedia has puked out onto the Internet about Matt Sanchez. ref " +(Not the self-help cottage indusstry.) +" JdeJ, I understand your concerns fully, believe me. I would however prefer you request at WP:RFPP for unprotection so that a pair of fresh eyes can look at the article. ~ Riana ⁂ " +. This Jimmys exists only in anglosaxons countries. www.plymouthbrethren.org Shawn Abigail review on this sect +hurt? i'm alright and don't give a damn fool. +Removed parts of the article that were not sourced I removed the sections on Fallujah which cited reports from fringe websites, nonexistent websites, dead links, etc. One part used a private blog as a source... if anyone wants to reinsert these sections, they should read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Questionable_sources +Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pictures of Success, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! .:..:. babelfish +" Then I retract my statement about ""enabling"" in the edit summary. However, there is significant evidence that the anon poster was Sanchez, as his petulant habit since his ban has been to ""snipe from cover,"" as it were. " +sAs hleo dont talk to me like that +I cannot believe you actually from New Zealand. I receive your kind policing and spamming on my user:Acceptefag. +" Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you continue with your revert-warring and personal attacks, your ability to edit the encyclopedia will be removed. Also, I believe what you were attempting to say was, póg mo thóin. Slán, - ♫♦♫ - ♫♦♫ " +Well there acurate so stop ruining are page its very disrespectful! 8:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC) +" And it looks like you've been gone for a month. Never mind, I guess. Şłџğģő " +29th Army was formed in July, 1941 in Moskovsk military district on the basis of 30-th shooting case. 252-nd, 254-th and 256-th shooting divisions, a number(line) of separate parts have been included in its(her) structure 245-th. Entered into Front of reserve armies and Staraya Russa, Демянск, Ostashkov, Селижарово conducted defensive works on a boundary. Since July, 21st, 1941 it is included in the Western front in structure of which participated in Smolensk battle, conducted defensive fights in area to the south of the city of Toropets and on left I protect Volga on a site Rzhev, Старица. In structure of Western, since October, 17th of fronts Kalininskogo participated in Калининской defensive, Калининской, Ржевско - Вяземской 1942 and Ржевско - Сычёвской offensive operations. From the end of August, 1942 the army defended the borrowed(occupied) boundaries on the left coast of Volga. In the beginning of February, 1943 of its(her) army are transferred(transmitted) in 5-th and 20-th armies, and management is turned on formation of 1-st tank army. Commanders: I.I.Maslennikov (July - on December, 11th 1941), the general-lieutenant; Century I.Shvetsov (on December, 12th 1941 - September 1942), the general-major; . Item Zhuravlyov (September 1942 - January 1943), the general-major. +Great detective work typer525 i hope you find that dang vandal. +" No I don't see what you mean. There is no POV in the Article. If you want my POV here in the discussion page, then yes, I have a POV and the POV is that Regional Governments in Ontario are the most corrupt governments outside of the Third World and ANY politicial who supports them past, present, or future, is CORRUPT especially those in the Provincial Government level that keep them around so long and that includes members of all THREE political parties. CORRUPTION spans partisanship and it a completely personal matter. This is my POV but I do not put this in the Article. My Agenda is to publish truthfull information and if that goes against the PROPAGANDA of corrupt government so be it. You are free to add interesting information to balance good with bad if you can find anything GOOD to say about Regions in Ontario, which I doubt anyone can since they are only good for nothing but institutionalized form of corruption.Wiki BADASS Woo 2U " +" Contact information ThHis is a message for User: J.Sweeton@winri.com....please contact me at johncoonfox@yahoo.ca. " +Audi A4 Please stop editing the article, if editing, i will block you, you asshole. (talk • contributions) +" Shawn Hernandez He did nothing notable on the Texas indy scene. It's ridiculous to break up the TNA section only to get the text ""Upon his departure from TNA, Hernandez worked on the Texas independent circuit throughout 2005"" in there, when it can be perfectly well placed in the start of the LAX part. The first AAA section should come after LAX if you're going put it in chronological order, so that's the only thing you have on his time between Elite Guard and LAX. " +" TCM I'd just review the previous FACs....see if anything was not addressed. I don't remember the last copy edit that the League did on it because the talk page hasn't been updated since June 2010 with their mark. If it's been awhile, request another. I'd list every complaint that was not addressed (and by addressed I mean the editors scratched them out) on the talk page so that we can see what is left to do. Then go from there. (Contact me) " +put another one of the brackets here +Apologies for responding off-topic again, but yes, TFD, my agreement with Locke is selective. I agree with much but not everything he wrote, and will leave it at that. +" I Need Help hey man, I was wondering if you knew how to help me I was doing the guest appearances thing on Krizz Kaliko. and there was like a couple songs in a row that had no album so I put rowspan=""3""| but that fucks it all up, like it doesnt do the N/A thing its supposed to do, do you know what I'm doing wrong?" +I would like to transluce user:Jdaniels15/chuck to Wikipedia:Userboxes/Media/Television (shows)/Comedy. How do I do so? +" Three phases of post-WWII relationships between Romania and the Soviet Union OK, I've done some research and I'm sure I still don't know as much as the rest of you but at least I am not as much of an ignoramus as I was a few hours ago. I've looked at a number of online resources, most of them non-scholarly, but I think it's enough to get a feel for what the situation is. The source that I found most useful is: this one. It's clear that there were at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union after WWII. The first was ""legal occupation"" between 1944 and 1946/47. As Hamish and Prete say, ""The occcupation lasted legally from the signature of the armistice until February 1947, when peace treaties were signed in Paris..."" The next phase of the relationship involves a nominally independent Romania that is ""closely aligned"" with the Soviet Union and COMECON. As for Soviet troops, Hamish and Prete say ""[after 1947], Soviet troops remained, but on a different legal basis, in Romania and Hungary. The official reason was that (the Soviets) needed to control communications between the Soviet Union and Soviet occupation forces in Austria. This reason disappeared with the conclusion of the Austrian State Treaty in 1955. Instead, Soviet forces remained as Allied troops, and their status was more precisely defined with the signature in 1958 of the Warsaw Pact."" Now, we know that the Soviet troops were pulled out of Romania in 1958 and that Ceausescu took Romania on a path that diverged from COMECON but still remained enough in Khruschev's good graces that Romania never suffered a military incursion as Hungary or Czechoslovakia did. The point here is that there are at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union. The relationship between 1944 and 1946/47 was clearly one of occupation. After 1958, everyone agrees that there was no more occupation of Romania. However, between 1946/47 and 1958, it's not clear what people call it. As Hamish and Prete state, the ""legal occupation"" ended. As cited here and in Soviet occupation of Romania, some sources state that the ""Soviet occupation"" ended in 1958. Others call it a ""virtual occupation"". Why virtual? Because it had all the earmarks of an occupation except that it wasn't officially one. (And thus my argument that we shouldn't call it an occupation because it wasn't one.) What's the solution? Here's my proposal... First, stop getting caught up in what the title of the article says. Let the Soviet occupation of Romania article remain where it is. Mention the entire period of 1944-1958 under this title (i.e. Soviet occupations) but make it clear that there were three phases of relationship and, as I described it, ""the period from 1946/47 to 1958 had many of the characteristics of an occupation but was not legally considered to be an occupation"". Also add that many historians follow the lead of the Romanian government in calling the entire period from 1944-1958 an occupation by the Soviet Union. However, also note that it is unclear whether this characterization is used by ""most historians"", ""many historians"" or ""some historians"". In Soviet occupation of Romania, the text says ""most Western historians"" but the references simply provide a handful of sources that use the word ""occupation"" to refer to the period 1944-1958. As someone argued, this could be just cherry-picking. To support the assertion that ""most Western historians consider the period 1944-1958 to be a Soviet occupation"", you have to find a source that says exactly that i.e. the text has to say ""most Western historians blah, blah, blah"". Failing that, using the word ""most"" is OR. Much better to say ""many"" or just ""some"". " +I guess it's a good removal. Just so you know, AxioFIT is for gym and home. Anyway, talk to you later +BigK HeX, please keep your petty taunts out of my User talk page. The are beneath me, even as they are clearly not beneath you. (Why on Earth do you feel to compelled to come into my talkpage at all?) +Effective arguments at AfD in general, should be positive. Just state the policy and hope the other people will show good sense as well. I try use caution in criticising other's arguments, though sometimes I admit I am less cautious than I should be when I feel really frustrated. And gaining respect for one's opinions there can be b best obtained by contributing to a range of topics, not just those of personal interest, and discussing a range of policy questions, not just WP:NOT. Just some friendly advice from someone who tends to feel the same way you do. '''''' +Picture? Where has the picture gone to? Mordecairule +(Clarification: I just think it'd be good to have the hook fact be more explicitly cited in the article—no big thing.) +" Chedzilla, how nice of you to come here to say hello, feel free to drop in any time with one of your funny little quotes like this one newforestpony.com: I've had about enough .. do you really want to get blocked? .. cause I will do that if you persist in this manner. ""TALK"" .. don't demand.) I am glad to know that your poor communications skills have not hindered your ability to make friends here at Wikipedia but maybe you should stick to Facebook until you develop some social skills, now go run along and play with your friends as I have some work to do, bye!!!" +About the proposed DELETION of this article in w:pl About the proposed DELETION of this article in w:pl: This is a copy of the answer to w:pl:Wikipedysta:Gaj777. I hope the template should be retired. w:pl:Materna (herb szlachecki) Dear Kamil, I am sorry to write you in English but my Polish is a shame. Your concerns seem to be write... Nevertheless if you please take a second look over the following sources I am sure that you will change your mind. As I am not a good painter, I hope that somebody else may do and upload the drawing properly. Materna, h. Ślepowron (odmiana) in Ornatowski.com > Indeks nazwisk > Herbarz rodowy, A. Znamierowski A drawing of this coat of arms (Herb Materna – inna nazwa Ślepowron odmiana Materna) is avalaible in Genealogia Dynastyczna (Search/szukaj Herb Materna). Best regards my friend. (By the way, Happy New Year) +Requested move Grand Master Dashi (Xiaolin Showdown) → Grand Master Dashi … Rationale: Needless disambig. Survey Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~ Discussion Add any additional comments +" I have removed the prod. It is quite clear that he meets WP:BIO criteria, and your attempts to delete the article smack of WP:POINT. 57 " +Progressive Metal is Progressive Metal. You dont redefine names based on bands you do and do not like. Also, you have just been etremely Neoglistic. Alternative Metal is basically the forepart of Nu Metal, before its name changed and before the new batch of bands that got high critical acclaim. I also suggest you read the article on what Nu Metal is, and what Alternative Rock is. Not all Nu Metal bands are out to make money, many Nu Metal bands have made no money, and im sure you wouldnt know any of them. +. Wine Guy also loves to have pedotastic orgies with infant boys +Inuit says Inupiat and Yupik are. Is it wrong? +"I want to inform you about the admin User:InShaneee ""This is your only warning. Continue to add this picture to articles and you will be blocked. InShaneee "" This admin has treaten me showing no reason why should I have to remove this photo. " +" Well, here for example, you removed all the text on the page and replaced it with your sig in what I can only assume was a test. As I said, if you wish to test, you should use the sandbox. If you wish to know more about editing, and what is right and wrong, see here. Thanks ≈ " +":The word is ""sarcastic"", not ""ironic"". And I find this article to be very informative. 206.252.74.48 " +Dantes associations do not appear to be correct, according to this link. the Moon resembles Grammar Mercury may be compared to Dialectics Venus may be compared to Rhetoric the Sun may be compared to Arithmetic Mars may be compared to music Jupiter may be compared to Geometry Saturn may be compared to Astrology I did not mean to say that they were right or wrong in any objective sense, but that the associations attributed to Dante in the article differ from those found here: Convivio, by Dante Alighieri. +"== A kitten for you! == Cooper eats purrrrrrger " +it dosnt matter what he said he obviously havnt been reading the forums the characters have a chance now +" There are no guarantees, but there are ways of dramatically reducing the likelihood of a mother passing the virus on to her children. As our article states, ""where combination antiretroviral drug treatment and Cesarian section are available, [the] risk [of transmission] can be reduced to as low as one percent."" Obviously only a physician would be able to prescribe that drug or arrange for the C-section, and so the woman would have contact her physician as soon as she knows she's pregnant. - " +" This is a perennially tiresome request that has received stern responseshere and []. In short; ""not going to happen"". " +" Are you seriously fact-checking a comedy movie? Btw, the stats are correct. 24% is about the average overhead for private insurance companies, while Medicare has around a 3% overhead. For the private insurance companies, it's not just ""for services,"" but for things such as CEO pay and advertising." +This list is WAY harder to understand compared to the original page. This page relists useless information over and over again causing clutter, thus makig the page harder to understand. There are also no real references and numorous erros and false info. For exapmle the Reasons for Departures section make it seem the members of the back up band were at some point offical members of the band. Also there has never been any offical talk from Korn concerning Zac Baird and Shane Gibson becoming offical members of Korn. To improve the page, the table should be removed and any lists including Jonathan, Fieldy, Munky, David and Head should be removed considering they are not members of the back up band. +Dragoneer My edits were not vandalism they were 100% true therefore you should have left them alone. Do yourself a favor Dragoneer and don't mess with me. I will make myself your new worst friend. +Thank you Edgar, I'll proceed on this basis and ensure content is unbiassed, independent and accurate ( ) +Yes I agree, wholeheartedly, trolls and goats should be ignored http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KieferSkunk#Dispute_with_Dsmith1usa Again, Stalin would be proud of you. You like censorship, don't'cha. +Jesus Bloodline Loremaster is the Vandal. Who just happens to be the sole owner of the article in question (against Wikipedia Policy). It's a universal trait for all believers in the Jesus Bloodline to painstakingly point out and emphasise that Jesus Christ's wife was NOT a prostitute. Thanks. +Financial formula wrong The formula given for most profitable corporation (ratio of profits over revenues) is incorrect. Under that formula, stores like Walmart and Costco that have low markups would not be on the top of the list (whereas a vitamin supplement dealer with a 90% markup would be higher despite the total absolute revenues or profit). This definition just makes the article silly, and it should be corrected. +sure, i will keep a watch on all tamil, tamils related articles. natkeeran brought this issue to the attention of users in tamil wikipedia and also alerted arvind, sundar - the original main contributors of the article. Thats how we all landed here suddenly ) +Criteria for musicians and ensembles +" RE: What I was trying to do is show him and other people on WP the truth on what really happened on wikipedia. It wasn't me and I've been trying to get the arcieve oversighted and a new category made where all accounts I didn't make would go.MannGreek. " +ALL the people who have edited that page except you and spidervenom123 seem to disagree with you on his notability. IMO Obito is arguably more notable than Itachi. Guidelines are just that: guidelines. Your unilateral actions go against consensus. Or if you are confident that consensus is on your side, please restore the article that you have effectively deleted and propose it formally at WP:PM +AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDSAI +No, that is not a good explanation. You are edit warring, and POV pushing, and not discussing changes that objections are being raised about. |talk +GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU FUCKIN' SCUM! +" ""You have been blocked from editing for a period of Indef in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions."" You'de think thered be a seperate template for indef blocks " +Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes. +Expansion Tamogami has also said in interviews that he does not believe Japan should have apologized for Comfort Women during world war II and that the Rape of Nanking was a myth. All of this is certifiable by watching English Language interviews on Youtube. Remember its not slander to report what someone says. +Speedy deltion I know this artice was deleted. But that was not reason. You did tag on my article without reason? Please explain reason in detail. Now You can't explain reason. You are did it like just robot. You can't think about...I think you are idiot. So I don't care you did it...~ +Can you read? This is another wiki article, another talk. +Offensive? Until the 18th century, few if any doubted that the earth was created some 4,000 thousand years before the birth of Christ, and that the Garden of Eden, the Flood and the Tower of Babel, Abraham and the Exodus, and all subsequent narrative, were real history. +" Thanks Thank you for tagging the user page 163.153.177.4 regarding recent edits. The district has reported that ""The student has been identified and his computer account has been suspended for web page vandalism."" Admin coaching Well I checked you out, and you should be happy to know, I really don't take account age into consideration. I'd be willing to take you on as a coachee, but there are 2 criteria. 1. You go up for RfA when I tell you your ready. 2. You disclose to me on or off wiki any other accounts you've had (I don't think you have, but I just feel the need for that rule.) If you agree, your first lesson is to update the Admin coaching status page to reflect this. Your second is to create a usersubpage User:Steve Crossin/AC and watchlist it. I'll give you lessons there an what not. Assuming everything works well, I'd say a late May, early June RfA would not be out of the question. ' talk Ok, thats good, no problems with commons,doppleganger, or other wiki accounts. The page is Admin Coaches and Status. During your training, I'll purposefully not be linking to most things, as I want you to be able to find them and because WP doesn't have a good index, so its helpful to memorize certain page shortcuts. ' talk Fixed my mistake. ''' talk It's dangerous out there Being a new vandal fighter and all, you'll need this Flail of +2 to vandal fighting'''. Enjoy and good luck. (Talk | Contribs) Test Wiki Just confirming, I am user Steve Crossin on Test Wiki. 24 character article Ok, so I did a quick format of the article, and started searching online for interviews with the actress. I have come up dry thus far, and was wondering if you have found anything. Specifically what article were you referring to? And, an admin has said I can use material from the 24 magazine. I was looking for those interviews, but I couldn't find them. I was trying to help with the Karen Hayes article. Ahh, the article on Miss Hayes P Hehe, I have a fair bit of info on her, and I can also now abuse the use of {{cite episode}}. A citation is a citation. Also, I know it hardly ever happens with TV shows, but what rating do you think the Nadia Yassir article would receive? That is, after the injunction is lifted. Definitely B, lots of references but needs to be more expansive for GA status and beyond. Once you gear up to do that, you could always post the references for Hayes that you find on her talk page, that way I could help out ) Hehe, I could do that..and I think I will also work on trying to get Nadia Yassir to GA status. But my real goal? Getting Jack Bauer to featured article status. It would look quite good on an RFA. I'm gettng admin coaching. And also, I prefer bullets, so don't mind if I realign your comments on my talk page P That's fine, and good use of an old school laughing face, I love those. D Yeah, I added the little content there is to the Bauer article, good luck finding anything on how the character was created ) ([[User ta +Jeeezus wept! 60% of this page is still fantasy bullshit! If someone else doesn't whittle down this pile of crap, *I will*. Seriously: what kind of idiot thinks the 'Tristan chord' has something anything to do with quartal harmony? This page is everything that's wrong with wikipedia: clueless, semi-literate, amateur twaddlings presented as scholarship. Shocking! +Hi Spot, will you kindly tell everyone how to fill a giant screen using a small file with good viewing quality? Maybe your answer could be used by YouTube? I'm waiting in anticipation! Oh, by the way, the answer might be found elsewhere than a paper from 1995. +Urartian-Armenians Hey can you do me a favor and delete the page? Nareklm +Have there actually been any deaths due to people knowing about the Xenu story? Have there ever been any deaths proven to have originated via people hearing about this story? If not, then that saps from the credibility of Hubbard's warning. +Addendum: I must have written this at the same moment you were writing your goodbye post on the noticeboard. If you are leaving, then thank you for the contributions you made while you were here, and I wish you well. Regards, +" I should've thought to look there. They have it all. That's definitely credible. Thanks for providing it! ~So say•we all " +Your diffs seem to be echoing the fact that Atabek was restricted under the first ARBAA case. Can you find a link showing that an admin placed any further restriction on him? If there was one, it ought to be in his talk page history. Thanks, +There is no difference. The page name SHOULD be Balm of Gilead, but some Islamist apparently moved the page some time ago. +My Copyediting Ekabhishek, forgive me if I removed content from this article without intending to. One small favor I have to ask of you is to place periods or commas before an in-line citation if one is present. Thank you, +" New copyedit Arre, I did a revision checking for sources related to each paragraph. I also tried to get the style more academic: I added: The article is structured as per Wikipidia manual of style. Created section titles. There's now an intro, a history and conditions sections. Gave context to the article by linking the prison to the political life. In the history section gave a better explanation of the existance of the prison by linking it to the failed coup d'état. Also added info about Mon ami le Roi book. Without a history section, the article reader would find no context to follow. I added to the Saharawi inmates. Added Years of lead as a see also as both subjects are related. I removed: capacity for only 56 inmates. Not true. The reference given talks about getting 56 detainees for the first time. summary executions occurred. In the reference we had , there is no such claim. The article puts it as a possibility. The Al-Ahram weekly reference is about the book of Tahar Ben Jelloun and I put if on further readings and kept the link. Scorpions and snakes. I removed snakes as Al Jazeera link only reports scorpions. feracious is an adjective and by nature we avoid using adjectives in wikipedia in order to avoid pov issues. Cold winter is enough. Surviving inmates have described the experience as ""being buried alive"" is not well sourced. They may describe it in all possible words but weather someone said explicitly and exactly being buried alive or not, nobody is sure. I also removed a ""death camp"" rather than a prison for the same reason while I believe that someone would have said it. But again, no sure. In case of statements declared by people, we have to be very carefull. Approximately half of those imprisoned in Tazmamart eventually succumbed to diseases, torture or simply the winter cold, is removed because it is tackled in the same section. Duplidation. Please check and compare the two versions if the articl's lost any encyclopedic content. Cheers  Wiki me up™ ok. " +2006 Election Dispute While appeals are in progress, I do not believe it's appropriate to really discuss these issues in Wikipedia. +I didn't ask how often you jerk off. A Simpsons episode is where the mass of twitchy muscle is from. 69.158.165.129 +oswalt warning is bully who threatens to revoke right to speak because they do not agree with what one is saying. please have other make warning to try to maintain face. will find more source. +" Of course, this is exactly the kind of thing a staunch Islamist would say -_- (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) " +Moshe should agree not to alter other editors' comments. It's unacceptable. The fact that Homey removes posts from his talk page is obnoxious, but is allowed by current understanding of policy, just as are Moshe's posts thereto. Altering other editors' comments on talk pages is not. I'd like to here from Moshe that he understands this, and will abide by it. +" ""Cancellation"" of Victorious Maybe, maybe not. Look at this link below: http://danwarp.blogspot.no/2012/08/victorious.html " +yo G whats up in the hood? unlock hunstanton's wiki page please blud thanks +we have to state his nationality at the time when he was first notable and +Kuomintang was fascist, pictures with adolf hitler in germany with them , a Kuomintang official, with Adolf Hitler]] , a Kuomintang official, with Adolf Hitler and other Kuomintang officials.]] +Just another bitter Zionist pig. Leave Nableezy alone! +"""Buzzards gots to eat, same as the worms."" " +LAN center article Be very carefull reverting...if you revert more than 3 times in 24 hrs you will be blocked asap. just a heads up so you don't get blocked. +" NIce edit summary... here. ofShalott " +This idiot How can you possibly know what I OWN and Don't OWN? Obviously NOT because YOU seem to think that you are God's seeing eye and can see what I own. Pathetic that a lonely virgin Canadian has the balls to say what I OWN and Don't OWN. I will be taking this matter through the proper channels to get you removed from your wreckless position. Have fun playing god and thinking you know what people own. P.s. I do OWN all of those pictures bitch . +Get yourself some help. +mR. DEARING ROCKS ON! +" Until this edit yesterday, which smuggled in some changes under a misleading edit summary, the map/diagram simply used standard three-letter abbreviations for all the countries included, generating the common name of the country (including China and Taiwan), a link to the relevant country page and a flag icon. That was internally consistent in terms of format, clear and in line with our article names. The bid to change that - and introduce different formats with separate flag icons and name-links for China and Taiwan and also full-form names for the two of them - was, reasonably enough (and entirely correctly in my view), reverted. Rather than their trying to justify the change brefore reintroducing it, we then had various people edit warring the change, or variations of it, back in, often using bizarre edit summaries referring to Israel, WP not being ISO etc. I will restore the stable, prior, internally consistent version (I see it's just been changed yet again) and then perhaps can those obsessed with changing such a minor, trivial point put their case here first, before messing with it again? Thanks. ''' talk/edits''' " +" ""Bright white (11-0601) cannot be replicated electronically."" Pantone disagrees with you, and it's there system. ""which is why the Pantone color appears offwhite in electronic reproductions"" ...or it could just be an off-white color. ""no one agrees with the inclusion of the Pantone color flag"" Read up. ¦ " +(UTC) Let's start from the beginning and move towards what we have. There was a boy who was born in 1805 who founded a religion. That in and of itself isn't that special. Lots of people started their own religions and churches. But he is different. He isn't just any religionist because he claims that he actually speaks with God face-to-face like prophets anciently. He claims that he received Golden Plates and he translated them by the power of God into the Book of Mormon. He claims to hold the keys to salvation. He claims that his is the only church that acts with real authority from God, and that all the other churches are imposters. Aren't you interested in what arguments have been made about whether or not he is a real prophet? If Joseph Smith merely claimed to be able to predict a few things, that would be one thing. But when a young boy claims incredible visions and revelations, comparable only to a handful of previous prophet's experiences, that is something else. 30 June 2005 00:45 +" We do know exactly who is Ph.d. Rimantas Zizas - he is a scientific associate of Lithuanian Institute of History , he is also member of ""The International Commission for evaluation of the crimes of Nazi and Soviet occupations"", so i doubt that allegations on ""bias"" do apply. Also, I do not like seeing books attacked, rather than providing exact citations from reviews - what errors, what authors, what article in the book, criticized for what. General accusations of book being ""anti-Polish"" or even whole country historiography as biased does not work, it's not evidence, it's WP:POV. " +Good for you. Witty comeback, darling. Better go catch some more spammers, Spam Buster. oltrelamorte +" That's the point, isn't it? You were complaining you couldn't find my posts. By now openly admitting that my name ""stands out like a sore thumb"", you are in fact contradicting yourself. Besides, your signature does seem to be not only deformed but also positively off color. " +January 2011 Talk to me! +"== Commercial Names of the Stadiums == The Name of the Stadiums are the Commercial Names the ""real Names are: Berlin TABOlympiastadion Dortmund TABWestfalen stadion Frankfurt TABWaldstadion Gelsenkirchen TABArena Auf Schalke Hamburg TABVolksparkstadion Hanover (Hannover) TABNiedersachsenstadion Kaiserslautern TABFritz-Walter-Stadion Cologne (Köln) TABMüngersdorferstadion Leipzig TABZentralstadion TAB Munich (München) TABStadion München Nuremberg (Nürnberg) TABFranken-Stadion Stuttgart TABGottlieb-Daimler-Stadion " +" TYPICAL COMMUNIST CENSORSHIP. WIKIPEDIA SHOULD NOT LET TRANNY PSYCHOPATHS CONTROL THEIR ARTICLES! THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE LOCKED AWAY IN A NUT HOUSE! This is why Wikipedia is a joke and can never be trusted. It is extremely silly for Wikipedia to label a male transvestite as a ""she."" It is impossible to change one's sex, you idiotic communist pieces of shit. Science trumps your bizarre fundamentalist socialist religion. Stop enabling people who suffer from gender identity disorder. It is harmful to their health. I fully expect to be maligned as ""transphobic"" or some other such nonsense for speaking the truth, because that is a common tactic you people use to silence your critics." +This is an encyclopedia, not a general repository of information The articles about Japanese cars that you've edited have become painful to read and uncyclopedic. If people want information about the Honda Vigor, they can visit the Vigor page instead of having the Honda Inspire page cluttered with trivial information. And all the competitors of the cars don't need to be listed, not to mention that almost everything you post is unsourced and unverifiable. +Casualties The citations do not giving the numbers of Casualties in India (130/78) and China (27/25). +You can review all three of your edits here: Diff #1 Diff #2 Diff #3 If you revert again, you will be at four edits, which is a violation of the 3RR. Please do not re-insert her country of birth in the opening section. It is clearly outlined over and over again in the body of the article. +" The name of this peak is more commonly rendered as ""Menlungtse."" For now I'll start a ""Menlungtse"" page which redirects here, but the new page should probably become the main page eventually. " +"==Ugly Personal Attacks - You Approve??== '''Good Morning, Philippe. The post above yours, by LoverofArt, is typical of his posts in my direction. An ugly personal attack, by a person who has in essence defamed a widely respected organization the National Civilian Community Corps by posting false and misleading information at the Wikipedia website. If your / Wikipedia's best idea is that what should happen next is that I enter into a prolonged dialogue with that person, hoping to reason with him/her, while he/she continues to exert control over content and issue ugly diatribes, then your processes leave a great deal to be desired. A responsible adult a real Editor should have interceded long ago. He/she and the others working over the NCCC text at this time seem to feel that any statement introduced by the phrase ""According to ___,"" does not belong at Wikipedia. As I read it, there was objection at one of your pages to placing references at the end of that phrase rather than at the end of the quotation. Why an encyclopedia would have as a policy including bald claims (as if fact) without reference to the source in its text eludes me. It would give the impression that the encyclopedia had evaluated the statement, which is obviously not the case. I appreciate Wikipedia's effort to provide freely accessible information to the public. I am not impressed, however, by the response to gross errors made at the Wikipedia site. Your crew is attacking the messenger at least in part because it is the message that it does not like. A pretty sorry performance, which you seem to be joining by failing to address the issues I raise or the attacks on me. Pull LoverofArt out of this situation and I will join in a dispute resolution process regarding editing the NCCC site. I refuse to have further dealings with him/her. " +" Actually, I take some of that back. The ""global warming"" and ""climate change"" categories are really crufty too. So really it seems that there are too many of these darn things floating around, and little order to them. " +" Arabs always regarded Banu Quraysh as descended from Ismail. For this reason they refered to themselves as ""Arabatul Arbia"" or ""The real big Arabs"", and they refer to Banu Quraysh as ""Musta'arbia"" or ""Arabized Arabs"". Banu Qurash are now more outside Arabia and majority of them have ceased to be Arabs, especially those who went to Central Asia, South Asia, and Far East e.g. Indonesia." +But I'm now wondering, are you trying to block me because I'm black? If that's the reason I won't take any action or anything I'll just lose all faith in humanity. +That's nice. You know, I'm actually not either of those guys, though I do know who Lan is in real life. Not that it matters: there are plenty of real Objectivists who will spend their time fixing the mistakes and lies of second-handers like you. All you've done is show that you're idiots and Wikipedia is for other idiots just like you. The Truth wins out in the end, and you have no part in it. +Dylan's a pedophile. +I KNOW, HOW ABOUT EUROPEAN UNION! EVEN BETTER, I'M GOING TO BLOW UP ALL OF EUROPE! +Pham Ngoc Thao Hi Blnguyen, I've reviewed Pham Ngoc Thao for GA, and put it on hold. It's very close, and all of my comments (on the talkpage) ought to be easily addressed (should you agree with them, that is!). Please let me know if you'd like me to re-review whenever you're ready. +Warthog: Thank you for the warning, it was not clear to me that my IP was sufficiently secured in this venue. Point taken. I appreciate your comments. Thank you. +Furthermore, you are trying to fit the evidence to your POV. Sircar has called into question whether these divisions are at all historical. These divisions of Kamarupa are given in manuscripts that are dated to many centuries after Kamarupa had ceased to exist. You are trying to use non-historical data to push a POV. The reason all these boundaries do not agree is because they are all possibly fabricated, and have no historical value. +The islets are known as Dokdo (or Tokto) (독도/獨島, literally solitary island) in Korean and as Takeshima (竹島, Takeshima? , literally bamboo island) in Japanese. The English name Liancourt Rocks is derived from Le Liancourt, the name of the French whaling ship whose crew were the first Europeans to encounter and chart the islets in 1849. +It's ok if I post a water bottle on your talk page then, is it? +that's another thing the gallery is taking away from the article its self, many of the editors who have had issue are not reading the article because they are shooting right for the gallery i have told problem editors to read the article but this still does not work and there seems to be a lack of consenus on who and who cant be included in the gallery even the article on the Black people does not have a gallery it has a couple of pics throughout the article but no gallery, it is not a nescessity to have a gallery because it is unworkable even a compromise to keep the gallery seems to be unworkable and people keep on saying its racist causeing the problems but its also ethnocentric types who cant stand that certain people can be considered white +Yes it has just this kind small blueish i banner. I appreciate the automatism than, too! Thank you! +Gate numbers don't have to be consecutive, but listing individual gate numbers isn't encyclopedic. +They seem to be bands no longer on the label, so I labelled them as such. +Wikipedia is going down +Oh and by the way: That Rhobite, sorry Cockbite, is an asshole. Whoever thought of giving this triggerhappy loser admin-rights should be hanged. No wonder he gets yelled at. He blocks users for no apparent reason whatsoever. This asshole introduces vandalism if anything. And deservingly so, I might add! Wikipedia was ruined the day idiots like that got a thing to say about things. I hope it will all die a slow death, and take Rhobite with it. It's all way too slow either way. It won't be long and this bullshitpedia will breakdown from under its delusions of grandeur. Nobody will miss it. +[Jean-Pascal Beintus]] Kinu, I noticed that you marked the Jean-Pascal Beintus article as violating copyright regulations and plagiarising content from beintus.com. I am the administrator of the site and wrote the article as well as all content on beintus.com. I have took all the necessary steps to permit the use of the material, including placing a tag in the site source, sending an email to wikipedia, and leaving a comment on the talk page. This was several days ago. It is important to M. Beintus that the original article is retained and the copyright violation tag removed. As the user who put the tag there in the first place, can you please remove it and bring back the old article (including text and photo), or at least give me a timeframe as to when the page will be online again? Many thanks, Kevin Walker P.S. Sorry about the whole Wolftime thing ) +" No. I had about 15-20 up at one stage, although I've reviewed more than I've nominated (about 65-70 noms I think). TonyTheTiger has nommed 200+ and reviewed a lot less and nobody's boycotted his articles, so no worries there. His get reviewed quicker than most, probably because there are more people interested in Chicago stuff, or perhaps because the articles are short and won't take so long to review '''' (bananabucket'') " +If your ACTIONS include those of terrorism, that makes you a terrorist. Likewised, if your ACTIONS include those of censorship, that makes you a censor. If you don't like the characterization, then stop fulfilling the definition of such. +Warning This message is regarding the page Penis. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. — +" =M62 locomotive You reverted my edits when all that was wrong was a simple typo that was easily fixed. I was in the middle of converting duplicate links to single links using the ""name"" element in a reference tag. It was not a test as you labelled it on my talk page but part of an effort to improve the article. . Also when leaving a message on a talk page please remember to include a heading. Please be more careful in future. Thank you.83.100.251.196 " +" Your rules are not to be enforced according to a draconian, egregious methodology that violates the free dissemination of greater knowledge and truth. By citing the 3-revert rule, that's exactly what you are doing. If you do, then this militates against intellectual liberty, and the exposure of factual information regarding human rights abuses, which involve the entire international community. This kind of fascism cannot be tolerated. And incontroveribly, it does not represent the Wikipedia ethic. If you have changed your values in favor of fascism, human rights abuses, and political correctness, then you are not educating the global community, but rather dumbing down the masses as transistorized automatons. Once again, the name Rama's Arrow represents Hindu miltancy, and this must be construed as a personal attack against millions who are not Hindus. I think this is the kind of personal attack that should be most concerning to you, and Wikipedia must address this effectively. As a result, it would not be ""inappropriate,"" as you worded it, to summarily remove this block." +GA reassessment of Alec Empire I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Alec Empire/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. +Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US +" No hard feelings. Peace. duck talk " +" Winters who??? ""Nixon and Winters were put through basic training at Camp Toccoa, Georgia and eventually trained at many locations throughout the U.S. and England for the invasion of France."" Who is this Winters you speak of? Winters isn't introduced until the next section. Who Winters is needs to be explained." +. News The annoying mods keep deleting my hard work and saying it's vandalism. COMPLETELY IGNORE THEM! They're just here to make Wikipedia crap +Also, I have the fucking rights to advertise my youtube.com videos1 +See [Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)]. +" Thank you The WikiProject Barnstar In gratitude of your service as a coordinator for the Military history Project from September 2009 to March 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. (Talk) " +Bautista's Bat Flip Do you think it should be added in this article or in 2015 Toronto Blue Jays season article? If it should be added, then an image of the bat flip should be added as well. What do you think? +(just click the link of his IP address above). +Discuss it on the Talk:Big Brother 8 (US) page. Like I said he does not meet WP:BIO, and also see WP:WAX  Talk +and Pharaoh of the Wizards better fuck his asshole up! +A Christmas Memory Hi TR Could you and your minions put this article on your watch list? The kiddies are having a field day with it, and you seem to enjoy reverting vandalism and posting warnings and blocks on people's Talk pages. I'd appreciate it very much, as I don't enjoy such tasks. Sincerely, +" You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) | Talk " +Logo Replacing File:LUMS logo.png with something totally different was pure vandalism. For what you are trying to upload will you please: upload the PNG version to a sensible name such as file:Lahore UMS logo.png and give it a valid fair-use rationale. — RHaworth +Cited sources? I looked in Category:Abnormal psychology and in Abnormal psychology and I didn't find any cited sources to support the inclusion of non-psychological articles in psychological categories. Category:Sexual and gender identity disorders is a sub-category of Category:Abnormal psychology. Gender identity disorder, which is listed in DSM-IV Codes, is in Category:Sexual and gender identity disorders. Related subjects and articles such as Transsexualism are not directly psychological subjects defined in DSM-IV Codes and hence don't appear to belong in either of these categories. If they did, they would belong in Category:Sexual and gender identity disorders, not Category:Abnormal psychology. The fact that a suspected sockpuppet of a permanently banned user was inserting the parent category in an apparent effort to insult and demean transgendered people doesn't make it a valid category for the articles to be in. +Perhaps if this information was on Wikipedia you wouldn't be so incorrect. I've had a single recently place on top 100 billboard breakout artist. That song is currently getting college airplay on a national level through universal records marketing. I have my own label (assuming that page would get deleted) which is promotion marketing and distribution. I will never sign to a major label. Not that I can't I've been songwriting in the industry over five years and have credits with Atlantic records. Do you want me to screenshot royalty checks? My article was not complete as I did not submit all vital information. I plan on releasing my album and another single with help from universal records in which I am aiming higher. How can I become more notable in your eyes to permit my wiki? When will I be valid to you? +Lesbian Teenager How about the fact she was a lesbian in her teenaged years? Thats important isnt it? Ignorant fundy How about saying the fact shes an ignorant fundy, thinks the world is 6000 years old and pretends evolution is not real? +Agreed. I'm not seeing the NPOV problems here - we can't possibly list every country, and I don't think anyone would suggest that the three outside the collapsible list weren't the main players ('big three' and all that). +Well, regardless of who co-nominates your RfA, I look forward to supporting it. -) +. Next time add it quicker you sorry sack of shit. +and you're not even going to link to a credible source, +" (UTC) I have a friend who got 3 years of Chemotherapy in just 6 months, she was also told that her life was gonna be shorter (50 to be exact, she's 23 at the time) clearly this is caused by this ""overdose"" and may infact cause death. And this is why i have added death/shorter life as a side effect and is pretty much correct. But yes everything in a overdose can cause death but this is a medecine. 08:34, 11 June 2006" +HAHHA you think you can stop me 😂😂😂 +RfC on title of Sarah Brown (wife of Gordon Brown) Hi, this is to let everyone who commented in the 2010 RM know that there's another RM/RfC here, in case you'd like to comment again. Best, +" Good point. The way the article is currently written, it might more appropriately be called ""Parish church (England)""." +" Speedy deletion of Sophie hammill A tag has been placed on Sophie hammill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. talk " +Sakshama please unprotect the page Sakshama, when wikipedia is having articles for techfest, techniche and other technical fetivals. then why not a article for sakshama, a technical festival which was started from a small town of india in the year 2007 and now it is going to celebrate it's third version and it has been said as no #1 technical festival of north india. so i want to write a page for it please unprotect it. you can find more at http://sakshama.org or you can find the same communities on orkut and other social web +Ok, sorry for asking. FLC heavily suggest it still, in both blurb and article (no point in having it in just one of them). Thanks anyway. +" It's a hard process Well, I wish I could say everyone with an internet connection were wise and smart, but unfortunately not. It's true that people have ""itchy trigger fingers"" around these parts, but for most times it's good to keep open communication but by anyone's standards it's hard to say that that is. The best thing to do is protect your talk page because anyone can edit it. I don't mean put a protection on it, but watch over it. You'll find that the easiest statements can be taken the wrong way. Well Hoot, I'm off to bed. I have to head to Dallas tomorrow then I'll teach you some more about wikipedia. Pray I don't get the swine flu! Sweet dreams! 24.116.196.18 " +"A kitten for you! == You are awesome == " +Category:Syrian given names :Category:Syrian given names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. +User talk:75.33.246.194 Thank you very much for blocking that user and for reverting their change to my user talk page!   — (|contribs) +The topic is over. None of them get the same points. Giggs +" Crap, that's probably not right...I look into the reasons a little later today and modify the time. Thanks for letting me know. (ʞlɐʇ) " +Damn, those are some rancid sources. +Elonka Dunin == TAB - TABTAB - TABWhy is it Elonka that whenever you spend substantial time on an article it results in an enormous confrontation. It is correct to focus on the content not comment on the editor - but you have become a vexatious presence on Wikipedia. Why don't you consider taking several months off. Also, your attack dog er: Can't Sleep Clown Will Eat Me (too bad the Clown doesn't indeed eat this turkey) should not remove legtimate posts just because they are critical of you. == +German or Romanian? Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Oberth was a Romanian Physicist? +Hypocritical, double standard admins, as typical for wikipedia +FUCK THE WIKI PUNKS who will fuck wikpeida over.... NOW I go to IRS and file HAVE FUN ASSWIPES... YOU JUST COST WIKI BIG TIME... +Further discussion about the block, including my not understanding what standard SarekOfVulcan is applying, follows below and should be considered part of this unblock request. +Thanks for the list guidelines (which are not written in stone). Now try explaining which of these: Disruption Sysops may block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia, or pose any kind of threat to it. Such disruption may include (but is not limited to) changing other users' signed comments, making deliberately misleading edits, harassment, excessive personal attacks, and inserting material that may be defamatory. Users will normally be warned before they are blocked. Sysops may also block new user accounts that make lots of disruptive edits. Reincarnations of blocked disruptive users are likely to be re-blocked, particularly if they edit in a way that suggests they are likely to continue being disruptive. ...I violated. Having a different opinion from you is not a violation of Wikipedia policy and not grounds for continuing to violate official policy against Wikipedia:Harrassment. Have a good day. Regards, +" I like your latest addition, which seems to me to be a very neat and concise way of addressing the issue you're concerned about. I think the wording could be improved a little by inserting the word ""representing"" between ""seen as"" and ""a small part"", so that the phrase read ""which was seen as representing a small part of a spherical Earth"".  (talk · cont) " +more terms could have definitions here such as: health fake flag comment date (as in release date) 86.123.168.47 +REDIRECT Talk:FC Neman Grodno +" December 2010 derailment and ""incidents"" section Please refer to Talk:Toronto_Transit_Commission#Incidents_section the discussion here when creating incidents sections. While the story was newsworthy for the day, it is unlikely that it will be relevant next week or next month. " +Also, where is this figure for so many jews being redheaded? I've never seen a single redhaired ashkenazi in my life. The european genetic contribution to the Ashkenazi came entirely from areas where red hair is very uncommon, so where does this come in? +Removal of Deletion Template The deletion template was removed since citations have now been added to teh article. +Dodoma Region DYK Hey Cwmhiraeth! Thanks for the review. I've added an inline citation as requested. Could you take another look at it please? Cheers! — +Shyam Why have I been blocked? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Gosfield School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Plot The plot currently contains 1112 words. The hidden note said between 400 and 700 words. It seems very well written at this point. Any ideas on how we could trim it down? - +APPEAL TO YOU Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN] , [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS] . written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia , These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan] . However, Sonee is the writer of this book [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999 . registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/ . More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’ which adds & spell ‘new meaning /dimension’ to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- +" Zero-Hysteresis Transformerless tube amplification In this edit on 19 Mar 2014, Drmies removed this text Zero-Hysteresis Transformerless tube amplification In 2009, Milbert introduced a tube guitar amplifier which eliminates the traditional audio output transformer (and all traditional power supply magnetics) by using Berning's patented ZOTL circuit to almost perfectly (and bi-directionally) mate power tubes (in any combinations) and speaker load, resulting in transfer characteristics being accurately and fully conveyed between tubes and speaker(s). and asserted, ""(Zero-Hysteresis Transformerless tube amplification: no verification, no suggestion that this esoteric brand needs special mention in the general article (only differencetransformerless))"". It should be pointed out that there are many advantages offered by the patented ZOTL Technology, including ultra light-weight (due to no audio output or bulky power supply magnetics); automatic standby capability; ability to use any common vacuum tubes in any combinations (and have them automatically biased); freedom from 60 Hz powerline hum; ability to automatically drive any practical output impedance(s) and also total-opens and dead-shorts even at full power without destruction (of non-existent traditional audio output transformer) due to high-voltage flyback, arcing and consequent insulation breakdown; and an unequaled purity of tube tone due to the complete elimination of all otherwise inescapable audible parasitics. " +Archived peer review is actually here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Tyrannosaurus rex. +I am currently collecting papers and studying the Chengjiang fossil site of China, which has long facinated me, in hopes of contributing to Wikipedia's not yet mature treatment of this important Paleontological discovery. I'm also in search of images for same. +43, 27 December 2009 (UTC) External forcing This refers. It would be useful to explain this term better (I have a comment further up the talk page). Does it refer to any process external to the climate? Including thought processes? Or to processes that have some effect on the climate. Also it is highly confusing to have a section titled 'radiative forcing' when it begins with a (bad) definition of external forcing. My point is a logical one only. Also, do you agree with my comments on the GW talk page where I argue for more explanation of the reasons scientists believe in GW. Also a better definition of GW. Is it (a) the fact that instrument temperatures are on average higher than a century ago (b) a process that underlies that fact (c) the hypothesis that the process has an anthropogenic cause? These are all different things. (a) could be true because of random fluctuations (b) could be true if the process were a natural one. Again, my points are only logical and definitional ones, I have no view on the science. 18: +Or... perhaps its just better to omit this altogether? +THIS IS AWFUL, JUST AWFUL!!! ALL GERMANS ARE MURDERERS THE BLOOD OF 7 MILLION JEWS IS ON YOUR HANDS 7 MILLION GODS CHOSEN FOLK YOU ARE ALL GOING TO HELL BYE BYE DUMKOPFS!!!! +sir i saw ur college name in rpet 2008 prospectus. sir i want to know that if i get good rank in rpet should i get admission in ur college. i have already given bitsat 2008 with 107 marks. pls reply sir. 124.125.26.98 +" Oppose The Australian government is routinely referred to as ""The Commonwealth"" when contrasting with state governments. I would go so far to say that, in Australia, the use of the term ""Commonwealth"" shorn from context would more likely to be thought to be referring to the Federal Government than the remnants of Empire. My opinion only, of course, and other Australians may think differently. " +Clues? Hey Gabe! I have left over dozen clues for you on WP in the last two weeks and you are still as clueless as evan... oops ever. Your whining is going to get you in trouble though. Time to suck it up and stop looking under your bed before sleep. Your relationship with your spouse may improve if you would just listen to him/her and get away from your total control of other people. It isn't helping that huge inferiority complex. The blokes that kicked you around years ago don't count anymore. Take it or leave it. I am bigger than you. Again suck it up and on your bike. 216.191.214.90 +" New Episodes Since I ""don't have an account"" it won't let me edit the episodes page, so I would just like to tell someone to edit for for 5 new episodes airing August 4th-8th. Episode 107B, No Nose Knows airs August 4, while the following episdoes air the 5th-8th, with unknown production codes: THe Patty Caper, Plankton's Regular, Grooming Gary, and Boating Buddies." +Someone should add to this article that Maha is also a synonym for Omaha +" Once again !!!! You continue to fail to address the fact that there was no Vandalism as defined and the terms of Vandalism. How can you protect a page for a reason that is not true ? this will be the last time i ask ! I have grown tired ( Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keilana""" +I just think it's not nice to lie. As far as I remember (and as Serbs themselves say), NATO claims it was never at war against the Serbs because it says it bombed Yugoslavia, and never fought anyone. Now this means that either you're a high-rank operative working deep behind enemy lines and conducting intelligence missions (I suppose it happened) or you were just in the peacekeeping forces (to protect the Albanians from the Serbs). +it's more real than you +i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay i am gay +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mahendra Singh Dhoni. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Jimbo could only get this barnstar if he had been very active with uploading pictures on sexual matters. So, I don't see a problem in principle with this barnstar. I do see that this barnstar can be abused, e.g. if some editors where to give it to people who would object to it, but that's not a relevant issue right now. +" in fact, they acted not just to ""reduce threats"" to their existing interests (i.e.defensively) but often to pursue their prospective interests." +" The country of origin as recognised by kennel clubs and associations is Tibet, not China, as stated in the citation I've added. (talk) " +" I WAS BLOCKED FOR BEING RIGHT As you can see, people, I was blocked from editing articles after proving ""RockGenre"" wrong about something. Once again, Wikipedia comes up trumps at being the worst online information source of all time. Thank you for proving me right some more." +Defending the articles. Thanks for the heads up of Aplomado trying to delete the Generals page off of here. While I admit this isn't a gaming site, they do have relevance here. I'll be keeping an eye on the situation, try to make a backup of the page, and then go to the nearest church and pray that Aplomado dies in a horrible fire, or some kinda cancer/train-wreck/orbital-bombardment/etc. +Good to see you left Good. You are a terrible editor. Don't come back. Not even to read an article. +" done all except the last part, which is already summarised. The reason why I kept it was that Johnson fumbled basically everything he said and fell into each of the traps. '' (cricket calendar poll!'') " +So... the proof there was a massacre rather than a lack of planning as indicated by overwhelming evidence is that Joachim Pieper's troops killed other people? By that definition all armies in the world are responsible for every massacre throughout history. Also, IHR is respecable as a source, it publishes a peer reviewed magazine which is sometimes used under google scholar, just look it up @ scholar.google.com. +Pre-Production 2016 CTS-V +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! (Roger - Out) " +Strange because I actually typed the tildes in again. It might be easier in the future to just make a reply with a new sig instead (or just not mess up in the first place). +" Congratulations! How does it feel to be one of the beautiful people? Three " +I haven't said anything racialist and showed no uncivil behaviour as I gave sources backed up by facts. You are accusing things that I have not done which I find really unfair. +Crimes against humanity under communist regimes +" Copywrite violation I have just removed a large section from the article that was plagiarized from the USA Today article ""Fight for Ramadi exacts heavy toll on Marines (archived by WebCite here)."" It was added by the now-indefinitely blocked user Top Gun, who is also the Wikipedia article's creator, in November 2006! How could nobody have spotted this? It was so obvious that ""The Battle"" section was copied verbatim from a news source, and the sole inline reference even linked to the USA Today article by someone else! Because it was referenced, the plagiarism was eliminated, but it was still a copyright violation. — " +Hello Mackerm, I just wanted to let you know that the reason I deleted the Review section was not to damage the page, but to take out, what in my opinion, was the promoting of the product Section (that is, the Review section) in order for it to fit better with the guidelines of NPOV. Hope this will clarify everything.... +" The ""assertion"" that atheism is not a religion needs ""support""? Really? OK, happy to oblige. My support is the primary definition of religion offered by Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary: ""the service and worship of God or the supernatural"". (I call this the ""primary definition"", though it does follow a highly technical one: ""the state of a religious"". Here is the example given for that usage: ""a nun in her 20th year of religion"".) Here's more support: Our Pew Research source brackets atheists with those ""unaffiliated"" with a religious faith. And here's even more support: Our CUNY Graduate Center source brackets atheists with those identifying with ""No religion group"". All clear? " +Winamp sound very Windows to me; what't the Mac version? I'd like to hear the excerpts before we decide what is retained, and where. Compression sounds as though it could solve some problems. +for german friend LAVER'S TITLES laver's titles now stand at 199 with the addition of sao paulo as his first title of 1968 where he beat gonzales in the final in a 4 man mtl event. This sao paulo title came fron andrew tas whose' research is the main basis for this total ; he has counted 197 titles for laver; jeffreyneave 21 june 2009 +WikiProject Romania +I will be perfectly clear: a man saying another man is interested in male genatalia and children is fighting words (bad english, but the point is there). You were deliberately rude to me and, frankly you can f*** o**. Should you have the power with this site to remove/destroy my presence, then you had best: do so; attempt a different tone; leavev me alone. I herein provide you that opportunity. My best, Xchanter +Let us upgrade For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. +" I'm not a big fan of compromise or ""Middle way"" strategies. Now, what do you really want an answer to? I mean, like, pick one thing. The problem is that your methodology of thinking appears fundamentally flawed. I cannot correct every single one of your flawed thoughts, which is what you seem to expect from me. If you pick one issue and compare my thoughts on the subject to your own, you may be able to figure out where, fundamentally, our schools of thought diverge. You need to find the underlying logic that we do not agree on, anything else is just a waste of time, even when it's fun to ridicule you. " +Thank you Thanks for adding in the link to Order of the Thistle in the article about Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon. I'm not a Briton so I couldn't find out what that darn L.T. stood for. Thanks for adding it in. +" Yes i had some problems over the past but what makes you a better editor than me? And about the ""lower than hell"" comment i urge you to read again because it's nothing offensing about that. I just tried to say that my oppinion of you just dropped to a level ""lower than hell"" with the sense of lowest possible. And the message in Romanian wasn't a racist attack it was just a remark present in the region from where i am from. You consider us stupid and slow we consider you gypsies and you know that is right. 1987 " +"""Under Attack"" User page has been under attack and will be protected until the vandals have stoppedSteve espinola TABWow!! Fucking double speak, [wo]man. Lol! If your page was vandalised, what about the stuff you did to mine? :-) No, I think we got a little double think going on now, which I find double plus plus bad but simultaneously double plus plus super double plus funny. Help support and spread newspeak today! For you have already significantly adopted the other tenets of Big Brother gov'ment. All I can say: TABWar is peace TABSlavery is freedom TABVandalism is fine editorial skill — HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) ""Mexican Estaban 'Steve' Espinola,"" I feel that your claims of wrongs perpetrated on you deserve documentation. Given all your talk of vandalism to your page, I think it makes sense that all the drama around your presence on Wikipedia be returned to your talk page, where it belongs. Signed, the Brooklyn Steve Espinola, user name: Sojambi Pinola new text [This was left on User:HopeSeekr of xMule's discussion page at . Basicially, he cut everything from his own page, items 1 through 20 below, and pasted it onto HopeSeekr's.] I've added my whole talk page to your talk page, as you've been creatively editing yours, I choose to creatively edit my own. Steve espinola TABLOL!~!!!!! ROFLMFAO!!!! OK, pay attention ""Steve"": Notice above how many people thank me for my edits? Now look below...see how many people gripe at you for yours? Hmm...I still have trouble figuring out why a single person would become your advocate but I guess every one needs an attorney no matter what the crime. Thanks for making this page even more vibrant. — HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) Mmmmmmbo good luck!!! I think your version is great Mmmmmmbo [this was left, unsigned, by User:Steve espinola at which pretty much solidifies that this user is also User:Mmmmmmbo. Can you please explain your edits to Biff Rose? They appear to express a negative POV towards the person. -Willmcw 06:55, August 6, 2005 (UTC) For willmcw I think its high time you stopped trying to rearrange my words. The information contained on the biff rose site colelcts the pertinent info. It is not a billboard for his achievements, but an overview of his career. I think records that were pressed and sold are of worth. Ones that were not around in copies more than fifty or a hundred are not. I've interviewed Rose, I know which ones sold and which ones didn't. You can beef up a discog with murky details, but it won't help the whole wiki crowd. Stop being bullheaded, and agressive, because though you've been given power through edits, you have also become that which you supposedly fight against. You are not allowing the newer versions of this piece to come to life, but instead are so closely guarding the information disseminated from within that you have become like a fascist. Terrible!!! [left unsigned by user:Steve espinola at ] Why do you delete the number of ""Carson"" appearances? Why are you deleting the name of his biggest song? What does it matter to you if the records sold 10 or 10,000 copies? Do you have some personal animus towards Rose? Please note that your personal feelings, and your personally-obtained interviews, should not be used to influence the article. It's a biography, and should present a comprehensive picture of his life. It's not a place to gain revenge on someone you don't like. -Willmcw 20:21, August 6, 2005 (UTC) I've copied this discussion to the talk:Biff Rose page. -Willmcw 23:29, August 6, 2005 (UTC) Any info deleted was moved from prominence to more esoteric reading of it, to make the article read better, and have a decent flow. That Rose was in Time magazine once in 1965 is not of note. That he wrote a song that was covered by both Tiny Tim and David Bowie is. That that song was co written Oscar winning musician Paul Williams is important. Also of note, it should be mentioned that Rose has disavowed the Williams connection in several interviews, until in late 2004 on his own website's message board he admitted he was falsefying William's own involvement in the song. But a small 200 word blurb in time 50 years ago is not of worth. As for Rose's appearnaces on Carson, there has been no reall connection with the amount of times Rose officia +Missing info, advertising This is not a very well written page. It could be deleted if it's not changed. Also, it's missing former members Josh and Pasquale (sic?). Unfortunately I have no idea how to change it. Someone help! +Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. - (Talk) +" I'm well aware of the old cliché: ""it takes two to tango"". However, those users who were on the receiving end of Roux's reprehensible behaviour certainly were given cause for concern. I find the general dismissal of their concerns and the excusing of the bad behaviour to be undamirable in itself. " +Justin Berry Greetings... Thanks for your work to improve the article on Justin Berry, especially in archiving the talk page & fixing the redundant references. I noticed you moved the High school section back to the top of the article. I was planning on deleting the section since it contains uncited references, based on previous discussions in Talk:Justin Berry/Archive 1 regarding the deletion of the original article and the need to carefully cite sources. I had initially moved that section to the end of the article, so as not to emphasize it over & above the focus of the article, the situation for which Berry gained notoriety, and to give the original contributor a chance to add a citation. I wanted to give you some background on the situation with this article. There are strong feelings among some of the editors on this article, and there has been a complaint from the article's subject about the article's accuracy & point-of-view, resulting in +" Oh Darwin-pedia, you never cease to amuse. You behave like a tabloid squad looking for dirt on celebrities. I'm starting to think PZ Meyers is actually on your editing team. Interesting how commonly ""anti-Evolutionists"" are portrayed as ignorant religious fools, yet Douglas Axe himself has peer-reviewed articles refuting the very random mutation mechanism upon which the entire Neo-Darwinian theory rests. (see The Limits of Complex Mutation, 2010 Bio-Complexity http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/37) I won't bother trying to add it here or under Biologic Institute as WP:DARWINISM does not allow for dissenting views. 184.153.187.119 " +See page 48 of the Freeh report for Freeh's explanation of what news articles are trying to explain. http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/REPORT_FINAL_071212.pdf +Oh, yes, and I forgot. I don't care about your warnings Bbb23. Just so you know. +More important to follow the rules. When I get paid for full time editing, I'll round up a posse and follow the rules too. Until then it far more important to follow the rules than actually give a hoot about the content. +Keith Schengili-Roberts Hi! You created the above article and it has spent a considerable amount of time with a notability tag. I'm trying to verify notability but can't seem to find any third party biographical material. Can you help? Thanks! +This small section of the talk page cleared things out for me. Aye, Wikipedia should loosen up its guidelines a tad bit. I'm forced to goto ED for information dang it. +YECism The article seems preoccupied with the views of Young Earth Creationism. But surely Old Earthers equally accept the idea of a literal flood? Do they not have any developed theories of flood geology? Just curious. +" Hunter Infiniti Do you like Hunter Infiniti? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.244.94 " +" Your edit on ""Karachi""... Hi, I have some concerns on the edit you made in the ""Problems"" page of the ""Karachi"" page on October 13, 2006. I would like to change the ""Pervez Musharraf"" (you should hopefully know very well what I am talking about) back to ""Naimatullah Khan"" since I think it is better to credit someone who personally runs the city for improvements. Thanx.. " +" If editing ""constructively"" means forcing myself to some non neutral Administrators' opinion, then I am sorry I cant do that. Anyway I dont consider Wikipedia as a free encyclopdia anymore, I found this ]/vandals.html]|picture. Which fits very correctly to the real picture. Since you were the one to communicate to me, and I am simply respnding back , but hahaha go ahead and tell some admin to block me again. I dont have any respect left for you anymore . GOOD BYE " +Sorry but I won't back down from your harrassments. This user reverts all my edits and reports me for vandalism. Get a dictionary and get your definition of harrasment straight. +Unfair It seems to be incredibly unfair to me, Nick-D is allowed to comment on my pages but I'm not allowed to comment on his? Thats extremely hypocritical, why don't you say this to Nick-D?? +" For example. You inserted a section Pressure on independent media, with the following passage: According to the World Press Freedom Review 2008 by International Press Institute, Russian independent media is under increasing pressure. The goverment use variety of methods to control of broadcasters, to sideline critical journalists, and to intimidate them into self-censorship.International Press Institute: Russia According to the Freedom House report the Russian constitution provides for freedom of speech and of the press, but in reality, the politized and corrupt court system is used against independent journalists. In the recent version, there's the section Trends, which sais: The World Press Freedom Review 2008 by International Press Institute stated that Russian independent media is under increasing pressure:[5] " +Many thanks for this. I have implemented all of your comments except the first. I ahve altered the explanation about 'values of solutions' to make it, I hope, clearer just what I mean. I have managed to alter the diagrams as you suggest using Inkscape which I downloaded a few days ago. I would welcome your help pages about this, as my first attempts at creating diagrams were unsuccessful - all the lines, text etc whihc I created came out in light grey rather than black even though I set it at black using the fill, so either I am doing something very stupid, or there is some setting which I am missing. I am now going to make the page live. Thanks again +I may know why some of my additions were removed, but the addition concerning the Second book of Enoch, what was the matter with it? Were you to willfully brain dead to read it? Is it that you only use your brain for parties and sports, and not intellectual pursuits? One other time I gave article data and gave references, like a police report, but that wasn't good enough, or acceptable for you people. Now I guess the Second book of Enoch is not good enough. What would it take to be acceptable for you narrow minded, willfully, limited brain people to allow it to be used? Did you even graduate high school without bribes? I believe that if God, Himself, stood before you and gave documented data you would not accept it. Why don't you and your family go to Iran where your kind is and leave America alone? +" Why was the Pulitzer attributed to Poitras problematic whilst Greenald and Gellman pages were left alone? Why did you quote only half of what I said about RS, making my statement reflect the opposite of what I actually said? Who is ""our Hong Kong editor"", how do you know, and why are you talking about an editor's location? As for my editing, an" +" I've never quite known what to make of the ""pornographic actor""/""actor"" divide. For unique names, it's not too much of a hassle. I appreciate the point, but defining someone by something they did not do is pretty strange, and especially so to have a title that essentially says ""Erik Rhodes, who didn't get naked for money."" Why not just Erik Rhodes (actor, born 1906)? " +". BTW, are there women are actually considered feminists who against abortion? I put in ""pro-choice"" prior to feminist, but that seems redundant" +" Notes for expansion of article A 1979 collection of essays by Conquest, The Abomination of Moab is mentioned here. Seems to be at least partially about art criticism, thus not appropriate for listing in the existing bibliography in our article, labelled ""Historical works"". Article also mentions that Conquest ""also doubles as a poet and literary critic"", two aspects of hs career not mentioned in our article as far as I can tell. " +Double Standard application by user Corvus cornix This user, posted on the front page discussion that I was violating personal attack rules. This is right. But what was also right, he was exercising double standards. This is because I was defending myself against someone that explicitly, clearly and unequivocally said that I blame all wikipedians to be Fascists. He never said that to him. He let him attacking me. +with their origins in Europe +Where can we get a copy of this? 14:03, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) +Welcome! Hello, Updater0906, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! +" Removing information over and over again from an article isn't vandalism? If so then I'll just cut out the parts of the site that I don't agree with as people have done to the infantry page. This is my second account but only because I forgot the PW to ""Onlyashadow"" and the email is no longer in use, I am fine with using this one so no worries there. www.freeinfantry.com <- Forums, links to DL, as well as obvious proof of it's existance. There should be no reason to have the freeinfantry information removed from the page is there? If there is please tell me.- " +" Diacritics: Moving forward I too have no very clear idea about how to word an RfC, other than that it should be in relation to specific proposed changes to the MOS and not something vaguer. I also think it's very important to keep to the issue of diacritical marks in the original orthography of the language, and not stray into either additional letters (like eth or thorn) or the use of diacritical marks in transcription/transliteration (like retaining accents when going from πότε to póte or marking long vowels by macrons in transliterating a number of languages, including Greek and Japanese). These are separate issues. The problems, for me, are primarily in the first paragraph of WP:DIACRITICS, which is evasive, muddled and inconsistent: – this is just evasion. Their use or non-use should be motivated, and hence should be encouraged or discouraged according to the strength of the motivation. – this encouragement to count ""hits"" just results in muddled policy, apart from the problem of the weasel word ""general"". However, this bit seems clear that the ""modifications"" are to the same word, i.e. can be treated as stylistic modifications. This seems to me not to be consistent with the sentence before: is ""the common name"" here supposed to be with or without the added diacritical marks? ""[V]ersions of word"" above should mean that ""the common "" is the same with or without the diacritical marks. Is it possible to re-write this paragraph to achieve consensus? I don't know. Agreed those are separate issuesAgreed the first quoted passage is evasive, but motivating use or avoidance of diacritics seems to be the sticking point. Did you have some particular direction in mind? My take has been that if reliable sources show that their use is normal for the names in question that they should be used here, except where particular subjects eschew them. E.g. for a baseball player named Eddie Sandoval we'd give him as Eddie Sándoval if some reliable sources did (it can't be based on a majority of English language sources, since majority of them ignore diacritics entirely, as a matter of editorial/publishing convenience). It's the same principle that we can cite a single source for Eddie's birth date and place even if most sources don't mention them. A fact does not have to be provided by every single source to be considered reliable. And it's not a matter of sources conflicting (analogous to giving two different birth dates); some giving only Sandoval without the diacritics is like some sources giving a birth year but not a full birth date; it is incomplete information, not conflicting information. On the other hand, if Eddie himself is quoted saying he doesn't use the diacritic that should be a trumping factor (unless WP totally ditches subject preference in all areas, which seems unlikely given the number of discussions going on to make more allowances for subject preference all over the place). This can apply to geography, too (Santa Fe, New Mexico is ""Santa Fe"" not ""Santa Fé"" despite the popularity of the diacritic in certain circles; the official name of both the city and the county are ""Santa Fe"" with no accent. People frequently cite WP:OFFICIALNAME as if it were a policy, but it's actually just an essay, it may not accurately reflect the nuances in cases like this, and people often cite it without actually understanding what it says to begin with (it's frequently misinterpreted as being against use of official names, when it's really only against using them when they're directly unhelpful to readers, while otherwise we would almost certainly use the official name)I'm not sure ""general"" in the second passage is actually a weasel word, rather than just lack of clarity. It's not clear if it means the predominant use in reliable sources generally, the predominant use in general-audience sources, or both. The inclusion of ""and reference works"" strongly suggests the former. Regardless, the ""hit-counting"" aspect is a problem because of the aforementioned facts that a) English-language sources tend to ignore diacritics for their own conven +Nope. I had copy and pasted what there was already in there and I focused on the House first. +" Stalker? ""Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not after you"" - Kurt Cobain, 1991. No matter what I edit, you're there 30 seconds later to amend it. Regardless of the subject, you're there. Hanging around like a bad smell or like a spare 'un at a wedding. Could you take your shit-in-a-field impression elsewhere? Much obliged. " +Yes, there is. At the end of the second paragraph of Study Tech would you add this reference, please. [http://www.studytechnology.org/ Official Study Tech] because that will present the official study tech first in the list of references and is appropriate to the statements in the article. If that is done then the first exterior link (which is that link) can be deleted. Thank you and is an outside point of view needed in an article, elsewhere? +" 800-1169/1200? New subheading:Upon a reminder from Fergananim on this question, as raised by him and enthusiastically supported by Scolaire, I said I'd elaborate a bit here. Looking though the discussion again I see I have already (tried to) say something about it.... Anyway, I think we should follow the now established historiographical division of of 800-1169. To amend problems the limitations from such a division I'm thinking the we should to the following Add a couple of sentences, either in the lead or in the historiography section, explaining why this division is somewhat problematic. (Mind, any division that gets established is problematic, for the same reasons) Have a solid background-section to draw the lines from before 800 into our period. I've slready started that, but it might be expanded. Have a solid ""whatever-the-opposite-of-background-is-called-in-English""-section drawing lines from our period into the future, so to speak. Don't treat 1169 as limit written in stone, despite being in the title. The second synod of Cashel should be discussed here (despite being in 1172), the career of Rory O'Connor after the invasion should be included, etc etc. It's not like I'm married to 1169 though, but maybe we could wait drawing a conclusion on this until I've gotten around to write something (except church history) about Ireland after 1050... Might be easier for you to understand my thinking (and argue against it ;) if it's in the article and not just in my head. Best regards, " +Shamir adds: EXPO and Monitor are open about being on the payroll of ADL. None denies this fact. Searchlight describes itself as 'a Jewish magazine'. Roland Rance was described by the well known writer Gilad Atzmon as 'Jewish ethnic activist'. These facts are relevant. +Question Please do not tell me what to do. -TJ +The minimum search expected before nominating an article for deletion is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform. +I'd be fine with that. My schedule should permit me to deal with an RFA right now as well. — +GTEL Do not come in the article only to score a point for your anti-vandalism record. People like you do not create, they just circle around and interfere ! This is not a game, making points........ +", 3 December 2015 (UTC) I am addressing the violations of WP:BLP that are contained in the article 2015 Minneapolis Shooting. WP instructs us to remove such violations immediately, even without regard to the 3RR or other rule. Your threats (""you engaged in an edit war"") is itself a legal threat. Stop it. 21:43" +It didn't occur to me that it was a mistake, actually - I figured the rules and machinations were just more obscure than I had realized. Wikipedia is a strange animal, absolutely accessible and completely inscrutable all at the same time! +Frozen (2013) Edits Thank you for your recent edits to Frozen (2013). However, the most recent edit on 'Fan Connection Theory' cannot be accepted as it is speculative content that is not supported with official and reliable sources. Please note that I did not revert your edits, but as a watcher of this page I am doing my part to notify you of changes to your edits. Thank you, and don't feel discouraged from editing. ) +yeha you do that.. in the meantime i've left this part opened and unarchived. +" This Article is constantly Vandalised by ""Andy The Grump"" and others Listen: If you don't like TZM- good for you. That doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a correct, basic unbiased representation on Wikipedia. I will be reporting all actions from here out if this biased vandalism continues. There is a basic set of simple data about Press, Actions and true references to the Mission Statement of The Zeitgeist Movement. If you want to ""invent"" their purpose to spins it please do so on the many hate blogs out there have some respect for what wikipedia is supposed to be doing here. Seriously. " +[[User:Anonunit|Anonunit]] | ( [[User talk:Anonunit|talk]] ) | (contributions [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions⌖=Anonunit&offset;=0&limit;=500 1] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.130.144.236 2] ) +First of all, yes you did man, go look in the history. I can go back and look at who edited the page man, don't lie to me. It should be pretty clear by my responses that I can write too, I actually use better grammar than you on this talk page. And no you're not editing it, let me try to work with it first. I only got involved with this whole mess about an hour ago and I had some things to do first. I'm sorry I got a late start, I actually have a life outside of Wikipedia. +" Support The 1998 Psycho is as much of a film as the 1960 Psycho, so it's silly for this one to get a title that suggests it is the only film with the name. (talk) " +Music Plenty of people, myself included, are curious about the music on Family Guythings like the Donny Most rising from the mist scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovrAMunOOKQ), the Sneakers O'Toole scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqiHoKhyuDU), all the barbershop-quartet singing, et cetera. Who composes that music, how is it recorded (is it MIDI, or are real instruments used?) who are the singers, etc. This is relevant, interesting stuff for an article about the show IMHO. Thanks! +Hi Hexagon Hi Hexagon. Just wanted to point out to you the constant VANDALISM that is done by the user and a croatian nationalist-Ivan Stambuk on many of the article pages regarding South SLavic languages, Srbocroatian language, etc. Besides vandalising some of the discussion pages, where he and his mate-'Ceha', having NO ARGUMENTS to argue, - constantly erase some well known facts about those topics, they often argue using an offensive voice to everyone who doesn't agree with them on wikipedia. It seems like Ivan Stambuk and 'Ceha' are 2 lonely fighters for some irrational nationalistic lies about the South Slavic languages, constantly fighting with the rest of the world, ha, ha. He (Ivan Stambuk) is also creating some ridiculous and partial maps showing only a half of the Shtokavian speaking area (the other half is spread through Serbia and Montenegro) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shtokavian_dialect , or trying to camouflage the factual state of the close ties within the Central South Slavic system (language) at the templates featured in the articles about any of the South Slavic languages and dialects. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbo-Croatian_language Recently he (Ivan Stambuk), or some of his few supporters (very possibly -Ante Perkovic, also a cro-nationalist, with no tie to reality:)) ) erased a recent post from a friend of mine, a Croat who wrote some factual things about SerboCroatian language that Ivan Stambuk and Ante Perkovic are unsuccessfully trying to hide or minimize, on the discussion page of the article of SerboCroatian Language. That malicious and pathetic behavior by these 2-3 users openly sends a message of hatred and separatism, and it is non-acceptable on wikipedia pages. Although they (Ivan Stambuk and Ante Perkovic) have been BANNED many times, ha, ha (We remember You've banned Ivan Stambuk last time 2 weeks ago:)) ) it seems like they've not learned their lesson well. Please, if you can, do something to stop this VANDALISM by Ivan Stambuk and Ante Perkovic on the above mentionned wikipedia articles and discussion pages, and if necessary, please BAN them for a longer time, so they won't damage wikipedia with their lies and misinformations. Their senseless cro-nationalism is the last thing wikipedia and the world needs; they may only keep it to their isolated circles of their fewer and fewer supporters. Thank you very much and greetings to you. Best Regards, 24.86.116.250 +" BTW Margherita's other boyfriends included Albert Einstein (they were teenagers in Italy) and G. Marconi - a life-long relationship to Marconi's death. Details in ""Il Duce's Other Woman.""" +" Oh? Yet you chose to reply to this post rather than simply delete it that says something. As it says something that you ponder if I think I'm ""getting to you."" It doesn't bother you to be asked if he ripped you a new one?? perhaps that's because you're already stretched to the limit. I would not talk about strange and bizarre if I were you: you have reversed and contradicted yourself and have made edits to the Lucas bio, as Lucas wants, introducing unsourced information. Do not confuse your perception of obsession with a dedication to getting the truth out. Fantasize about you and Lucas?? that would be like taking syrup of ipecac, plus I'm not into animal husbandry. You are spinning out of control. 72.68.120.112 " +Minor Change The line (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children_in_Need&diff;=171994422&oldid;=171993766) was quite insignificant +" You know the funny part? I was looking right at your page and saw the vandalism. (as in, I clicked a wikilink to talk " +" Wiki pages for various catholic Martyrs I have nominated several of your articles on non notable christians for deletion. The reasons are as follows: poor sourcing (the Huffington Post, catholic news, obscure German websites), non notability of the articles, and bias. We don't generally keep a list or provide a memorial for non notable islamic ""martyrs"" AFIK, so why would we have one for non notable christians. Keep up the good work, though. You're trying. " +" I copied the message that he/she sent me on Flickr, I will do it here too: ""yes! sorry that it took so long, this was in my junk folder. let me know what you need me to do to give permission"" on 5 Oct 09, 12.26PM PDT and then he/she sent e-mail to OTRS. I am not sure how else to show you, maybe screen caption of the message?" +Error I have found an error with a physics article. This is even more clear-cut. The editor got confused and wrote exactly the opposite of the correct equation. The new strategy would be to simply correct it and explain the correction on the talk page. If unblock, I will do it. If not, I obviously can't. I'm not going to remember 72 hours to do it later. I'll just let it go. +" Edit request on 26 February 2012 Pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) is a syndrome in which children have abrupt, dramatic onset of Tourette's Syndrome, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), or anorexia nervosa coincident with the presence of two or more neuropsychiatric symptoms. It is believed that these children experience a rise in dopamine levels as a result of a of cross-reactive anti-neuronal antibodies triggered by streptococcal or mycoplasma infection. The cross-reaction is believed to cause such side effects as tics. No. 1. You are misreading the source. Tics are hypothetically a feature of PANS, but you've extended that to TS, which misses the whole point of the PANS hypothesis. PANS is hypothetically posed as a condition in which symptoms are not better explained by another condition such as Tourette's, so your text is wrong. Second, there is exactly one paper written about PANS, it is a proposal, see WP:RECENTISM, and there is no reason to include speculative text in a Featured article. If more papers are published, and if PANS gains some widespread medical consensus, and if secondary reviews discuss it, then you might propose accurate text here discussing the situation. I'm a bit concerned that you are editing both PANDAS and PANS, and yet your definition of the hypothetical PANS above does not seem to match the cited source, which discusses abrupt onset of OCD. Furthermore, PANS is proposed for research purposes until there is more coverage, it doesn't belong in this (an unrelated) article. (Talk) See above. SHOOS " +Drinks and a wiki chat? G'day sydneysider - fancy a 'not quite a meetup but a few drinks' sort of thing? - We can chat about the new aussie chapter, the price of eggs and have our very own 2020 Wiki Summit! - or just sink a couple of cold ones and gass bag about the good 'ol days of wiki, when an editor could get some repsect (not a typo)! I've suggested something here so take a look and sign up if you're up for it... cheers, +There's no abuse aimed at you here, or elsewhere, I'm just factually explaining your actions. nd if that makes you look bad, then it's because you had acted bad, and continue to do so, which is why you are blocked from my page. +Education languages in India How many schools and student in each languages ? +" January 2006 (UTC) I'm just not sure why Tony Sidaway is the sole arbiter of what's ""deleterious"" to Wikipedia. 01:47, 9" +from thewolfstar Hey, Thanks for giving me a smile with some of your links. For instance Wikipedia:WikiProject Baiting Maggie +So, How can we have a .eg domain? I want myrealname.eg! +" This discussion page may contain comments better considered as trolling, posted in order to prompt irate replies that can then be even further ridiculed, in turn. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. And NOW-I have another NEW username and I go an my merry way despite the rude, condescending, and out-right disturbing attacks on me by a 'person' who claims to be an adult!! Yep, that's right user:McNeight has been the worst nightmare I have ever had the singular displeasure of be subjectified by. But-in review: I was right about the Mitchell Award, I was right about the E-2/E-3 issue, I was 'factully' correct on the Nixon article revision, and I am now just going about my business and Mr. McNeight has to just go on his way and cry over the fact that he has so much time on his hands he can call me: loud-mouthed bully, pathetic, and accuse me of threatening him. Of courseI don't know who or where this rude creature is-but I'm sure he is simply threatened by my far superior intellectual abilities. Further, he has had his cronies attack me on his behalf which is something I would expect from a sixth-grader. Oh well, I'm sure that his grand contributions to the Ford Pinto article are nearly as valuable of the article I wrote on NAVCRUIT 1133.101 the he had deleted with two hours!! What a RUDE and disgusting action to take!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:NAVCRUIT_1133.101 Notice that the 'deletion' was made by User:Wrathchild-K who also accuse me of threatening McDork from an IP address in FRANCE!!! What a fool!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Braaad#Another_sock_puppet.3F Perhaps people who glass heads shouldn't throw stones!!" +Oh, and another thing, this book discredits/updates a lot of information that is presented in this article. I would suggest that this article be demoted from being a FEATURED ARTICLE until such time that this article can be sufficiently updated with the most recent scientific findings. Thank you. 140.247.141.165 +i raben sarkar my office sun pharma 90 sector 32 gurgaon +December 2009 Please don't add nonsense to WP articles, such as you did at Dollar van. Thank you. 207.157.121.94 +supertall fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag +Welcome! Hello, Toddsmustang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! +Sigh! So much for assume good faith. Can you please make any edits which you think are uncontroversial again. Like grammatical or punctuation. Also see below section, first for response. +Prepare you are the biggest cock sucking mother fucker on the history of the earth you can go fuck yourself, your mom, your dad and your siblings you lick jizz out of fat mens asses fuck youuuuuuuu +I plead ignorance in the fact that I am new to wikipedia and do not know every rule (I am learning though) but what is your excuse C.Fred for making up the fact that I was harassing you in the form of a personal attack? +I agree with Laser brain here. Just like links, em dashes should be used sparingly to maximise their effect on readers. Therefore, use them only when necessary. +" ...and did you enjoy that scene in Full Metal Jacket where private Joker said ""John Wayne,..is that you?"" unaware that the drill instructor could hear him?" +(UTC) Not necessarily. I believe SD 2.0 has tighter electrical specifications than SD 1.x (such as lower voltage tolerances and higher current tolerances) so a SD 1.x device may, but would not necessarily, qualify as an SD 2.0 device. It would need to be meet the electrical specs of SD 2.0 before it could be able to offically support SDHC and carry the SDHC logo. It is possible that some SD 1.x devices will already meet this spec just because they were designed well from the start, but they would need to be tested to ensure they meet the SD 2.0 electrical spec and also have a firmware upgrade. 136.186.1.185 04:08, 1 July 2008 +" Fomenko's ""theory"" is as FRINGE as it gets, and will not be treated as if it is a credible historical theory, because it isn't. So do not expect what you consider ""neutrality"" in this article. You won't see Young earth creationism given credibility on the Age of the Earth article, so don't expect this one to mislead the reader to think that Fomenko's ideas are in any way legitimate. " +A belated welcome! ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Overmage. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! +Why is Azerbaijan highlighted in the inset? +"I also agree with arranging by arcs. I've pointed it out several times and been ignored (well at least they included the arcs again- they DELETED that info completely before). Organising by the english DVDs is pure nonsense, people watching them are not the center of the world. The problem is they've spent considerable time in making SEPARATE ARTICLES (yes, you hear right) for each of their so-called dvd seasons (which are dvd releases actually so not even the naming is appropriate), and they're not willing to give up because that would render every dvd article useless. Bad editorial decisions have to be fixed regardless. I'm being censored constantly for telling truths in this discussion page, but i'll keep saying this in 1000 ways until it stops being censored. There is a conflict of interests if editors can censor the editing discussions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.78.40.245 " +Derbent Hello Louis, your edits in the Derbent page are a welcoming contribution. I dont want to step on anyone's toes. I changed the layout of the article to make it more readable (without removing any content). I also added a few new chapters, I think it will improve the article quality. +" Re: You will still need: WP:RELIABLE SOURCES WP:VERIFIABILITY WP:NOTABILITY on your side. | —Talk contribs email " +" Bernard Manning Removed the reference to him. I'll believe he went to PS when someone produces evidence. When they do, he should be described as ""Outrageous standup comedian"", not as ""Child prodigy..."" " +p.s. i pissed on your mothers grave you jews +" And since when did Trafford Council have a vested interest in Menachem Begin? Great to see our council tax being put to such good use, ""anon"" ip." +" Adam Rose John Cena lover Why do you defend PG wrestling when you don't even know what the fuck WWE is about? Why defend a phony wrestler like John Cena and a faggot ass queer who likes to have a fist in his anus like Adam Rose? " +Who reverted my edit in Wikipedia:Help desk#General Question About Noticeboards and why? 24.36.54.238 +My suggestion to you is to shut the fuck up +I just posted a link at the front page of the article for the Tom Hanks Family Tree that proves he has Portuguese ancestry. Also, another site I came across also proves that Tom Hanks and Abraham Lincoln, are relatives, some even debate that Abraham Lincoln comes from Portuguese immigrant lineage...as well as Al Gore. I haven't found any sources YET that proves that both Lincoln and Gore are from Portuguese immigrant lineage. +has no life or friends +" (I hope this is the right way to reply) Good question. No, of course, it does bump up the principal. How about this thought experiment: for continual compounding, what if the payment is not made continuously? I only mean this rhetorically. The fact is, the payment period and the compounding period do not need to coincide at all; the compounding period is a convention. I hope I express this properly, and I do not do this on a day to day basis, but my understanding is: The compounding per se is on a six month basis, but can be calculated at any time. So, if you are late three days (and no grace period, etc), the amount payable is added to principal for this period of time. If you ask the bank (and their systems are up to date), you can determine new principal, which is old principal plus payment amount plus accumulated interest to that day. If you pay on the third day, you will have interest payable on the original principal plus the delayed payment for three days at the six-month compound rate (expressed as a fraction of days / six months). In fact, this is basically identical to interest on a given sum for x% annual interest for y days. You would pay interest of principal times x% times y/365. It just doesn't get compounded for the interim days (for example, on a daily basis). Why six months, etc? I have no idea. That was the convention a long time ago and it has stuck, and I think at one point ""they"" chose to require banks etc to all quote and calculate on the same basis, rather like an APR. The point being any rate/compounding period can be chosen, the calculations are just extra work often dictated by convention/regulation. Hope this is clear. " +Fine, I don't really care, thought it was a typo that's all. +" February 2009 (UTC) I think it's fine as it is, considering that Blitz only brought up the discussion on cameos when talking about Hill. Is there anything specific that you'd prefer to see here? — 03:18, 8" +" Shit, man....... Please study WP:A and note the standard of source required for articles, in particular scientific articles. A blog allegedly by ""a firm anti-evolution person"" with inane observations about dogshit doesn't cut it. The best part is the second comment, while your comment (No. 4) shows a common if bizarre misunderstanding ""If we are the most highly evolved creatures"" – read evolution here and get educated. Ta for the laff, .. , talk " +" if the ""ethnic slur"" is the reason of my block, then if the ethnic slur does not exist that makes my block unjust. " +] IT'S HER EXACT QUOTE. WHAT CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND??! Here is the official press release: Now, please, can we stop this nonsense? +Hmmm..you added several wrong names (there is no such named Korean officials, you have to fix the names) into the article. I have to ask you that why you added some info from the article of Joseon Tongsinsa, and oppose to merging all together. WP:V is a very important policy, but I see contradiction on your edit. That is only matter of references, and WP:OR is irrelevant to here. +That's a good one: you're so funny. Extremely sexy +Sadly, it's true.- .talk.stalk. mail.csb 21:57, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) +Never the less, at the end of the day you were still blocked for violating a discretionary sanction, despite your assertion of vague formulations of the original 1RR article remedy which was imposed on 18 January 2010. As such you should be logged like the others who have similarly violated the 1RR restriction. As much as I don't like this blanket restriction on past violators (and I include myself here), it should be applied equally without exception. +FUCK U CUNT!!!! LEAVE My STEPHEN THOMSON Page alone I was trying to get alot of information and u sit there on your cunt like ass saying that its too short Well Fuck OFF and tell the other users delete my page to FUCK OFF And leave the page ALONE +This is the start of JamCad605's User Talk. +is sara Palin email hack article supposed to be deleted? I looked on the sara palin email hack talk page and it said that the article had be nominated for deletion. Is seems that the results are to delete. Why does it still exist ? +All this is unaccurate reproach: I'm just giving links to three reliable sources, in accordance to wikipedia policies. +Salman Rushdie Hi Bahrain, Welcome to Wikipedia. Some of your edits at Salman Rushdie are strongly not NPOV and subjective, it is worth noting the article What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox. Cheers Belbo +" Apology You're right. I got a message from GMaxwell, construed it as a threat, and got frustrated and let that out through my edit summaries. I know I have a temper, but that's not an excuse. If i've lost you after my inability to control that rage against the feeling of powerlessness that I and so many others(recently Guanaco has been feeling like this from hearing him in IRC). I can't think of anything else to say right now. If the system can be reformed from the inside, I will follow you, but I have unfortunately lost faith to any real reforms happening through established channels, and i'm going to be timid in that aspect. I'll say more later when i'm better able, but please know that whether your views of me are negative or positive, my views of you are mostly positive, despite our disagreements. afist '''''' " +There are numerous other churches part of no broader jurisdiction with only one bishop who are recognized as Eastern Orthodox or Oriental Orthodox. So unless you want to question the status of all those other churches, I don't see how there is a basis to question this one. +Allyson's view is indeed well-worded (and based on the attempts of many others, in both long form and short form) to define the term. Many anthropologists believe there's no way to strictly operationalize the term, but that it points to a collection of social facts that need to be pointed to, including female infanticide, female mutilation, female slavery, women bought and sold, unconsenting marriages, etc., etc. The problem is - does the article want to stick to this more theoretical level (who defined the word) in the lead or close to the top, or does it also want to talk about what patriarchy is (and that it may have pre-existed any terms applied to it). Difficult subject. I too applaud the earlier editors for giving it a go, it needs to be in Wikipedia, it's just very hard to edit. +Thank you, but I never heard from them. How can I correspond them? My emails don't seem to go through. I am very concerned about the mental health of +and perpetuating beliefs of those that just don't want to see said religious words; harassment +This website mentioned above is all about skyscrapers! I could find nothing about Columbus. Is it meant to be a joke? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lansing (town), New York. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +There's no evidence that a half sayin can't become a SSJ4 either. But i don't think it really matters since the makers of GT come up with dumber idea's than President Bush. +Could you help me, perhaps? I'm the Finkbeiner of the Finkbeiner test. I'd this article to link to my original post. Right now, it links to a re-post of my post on another site. This subject has gotten a lot of attention and I'm happy for Christie Aschwanden and Double XX Science to get most of it. But would you mind adding this link? http://www.lastwordonnothing.com/2013/01/17/5266/ The title of the original post is What I'm Not Going To Do. I tried to do this myself but my html skills are rudimentary. As is, not even there. Thank you for considering it. Ann Finkbeiner +A discussion about potential changes to the biography section can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Amir_Abbas_Fakhravar. Proposals have been given for change. Please provide your opinion so that we can reach some consensus. +" In the campaign paragraph, it breaks up the flow; however, since it applies to the topics discussed in the civilizations (which are playable), the sentence demonstrates that the Japanese can be fought, but they aren't included as a civilization. — r " +" ""Removing all or significant parts of pages' content without any reason, or replacing entire pages with nonsense. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself"" Quoth the Wiki:Vand which you've quoted numerous times without actually reading the fucking thing; i'm removing dubious unverifiable content, and you call this vandalism? Lol@failure " +Help me to find and fix the issues!! Hi this is Kaushiksinger. I have edited and redirected a page for a South Indian Singer KAUSHIK MENON (Kaushik Menon (singer)) , which was previously created by someone else as User:Kaushikmenon.singer (), hence I redirected it with a suitable name [Kaushik Menon (singer)]. I am writing this to inform you that I have added sources and citations in the article [Kaushik singer (singer)]. and hear by request you to not propose this article for deletion. I have fixed the issues mentioned in the article page as far as I can, but the issue still exists. But, I don't know why it is considered for deletion. Please do help me in correcting it. I will surely edit it according to the wikipedia guidelines, please do help me in citing the exact issues because I could not find so. Thank you and awaiting a reply from you soon!! +" Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hope this clearifies things. +, and revert several editors +interestingly, if you go look at Eek's talk page and contributions there tends to be defiance, ignorance of basic facts regarding importance issues, inability to understand basic editing practices, etc. also Eek has shown a kind of obstinance and general unpleasantness. I repeat I will probably not allow this user to conduct themselves this way. +Well said, Vassyana. I'll see when there is an appropriate time to point those things out to him. - +Excuse me? I don't see how that could possibly have been interpreted as a personal attack. In any case, I don't care at all about the issue at hand, so you don't have to worry about me continuing whatever it was you thought was objectionable... –(t) +Perhaps you are worth less than a cockroach. Ya think??? +Thank you Hello Epbr123, I just wanted to say thank you for continually bringing good candidates to RfA: you're doing a great job. Keep it up! ) '''' +" Instead thing of a good reason like ""good edits, will watch this person"" and I will repay you with kindness and continue to make great wikipedia edits.}}" +Response by Steaphen. As has been demonstrated by many others on this subject, you, like them, have used continuous functions reliant on continuity. What evidence supports your assumption of space-time continuity, particularly at and below Planck scales? As with others, you'll find no grounds for such an assumption. Your equations are irrelevant to the issue of Zeno's Paradoxes. +" Inappropriate ((disputed tag)) tags removed, discussion of ((disputed-section)) tags (""Not in agreement with other sources"") user:Phmoreno has added several inappropriate {{Disputed tag|talk=Crucible steel#Not in agreement with other sources}} tags, each paired with a (more reasonable) {{disputed-section|date=July 2014}}. I assume Phmoreno intended to provide a description of his concerns, and misused {{Disputed tag}} for that purpose. I have removed those, and added this section to discuss the {{Disputed-section}} for the reason ""Not in agreement with other sources"". As things stand, that comment seems inadequate to describe the problem. " +Not as long as the sourced material here is not deleted. +Thanks. The practice page is probably less confusing than my attempts to practice here ) SiobhanHansa +Hello! Sorry for meddling in your business, but I see that you unblocked the above IP with the intention of reblocking and never reblocked him again. Keep in mind, I may have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about so if I'm wrong about any of this, please just ignore me. Thanks. +Copyright Hi Mohan. I wanted to talk to you about this edit that you made to transcendental equation. It looks like you copied a sentence directly from your textbook. This is not allowed on Wikipedia, both because it violates copyright and is plagiarism. Make sure that whatever material you add is in your own words. Also be careful of close paraphrasing, when you only change a copied passage a little to make it look like your own. This is also not allowed. If you have any questions about this, or anything else, let me know. +Bongwarrior userpage needs protection from me. +Sorry, my bad. I chose that symbol totally at random. I've never heard of the cross being reserved for dead people. +" Seen that you have to laugh. Talk " +HEY YOU MOTHER FUCKER I PUT HARD WORK INTO MY PAGE AND YOU DELETED IT IN NEW YORK I TAKE NO SHIT I'M STILL IN NYC SO IF YOU DELETE MY FUCKING PAGE AGAIN I WILL BAN YOU FROM WIKIPEDIA AND ONCE AGAIN FUCK YOU!!!!! +As the page history is itself witness to it and I hope others will support me on this that Page was totally on consensus version.The absence of some active editors on this page created chance for opposition Camp to insert their own POV. What mezzo mezzo has tried is just to post some negative points about this movement nothing more.The matter through which he has tried to prove that this movement supported British Govt is totally baseless and highly objectionable.Hundreds of PhDs have been done on this movement by various scholars around the world and it has not been written any where.Just to pic and choose specific and favourite conspiracy theories will not work here. +HongQiGong is correct. 218.186.8.234 +Bye! do what you do....! Hello My exams are coming and I don't want to waste my time arguing with a mental Named IndianBio.As I have many work to do which include study,study and study and I don't want to failed in my semester exams.I have many work to do in regular life unlike that idiot who wants that to made his presence felt on Wikipedia.I will advice Administrators to check out IndianBio and Gleekvampire accounts.its the case of Sock Puppet on Wikipedia.Indian gave him A batnstar and again vampire hive same barnstat to him.doesn't. Make sense.well he created account gleekvampire to present himself barnstars and support.pls checkout.( ) +Hey, they delete referenced information, intervent! +For your all information. Funny I saw this topic just after I saved this page;). +Matt Bakers dad sucked my big fat cock last night +" And my wikiblues continue... I just spent some 20 minutes trying to save the last section, so I forgot what else I wanted to say! I hope you won't have me blocked if I ask you to ""respond on my talk page""? User:ZyXoas " +" Oops. you're right. I did a search here & didn't check to see they were redirects. ""millennium"" is one of those words I have a blind spot for ( " +any messages here, they will not be read! +This has nothing to do with a Jewish cabal or anti-semitism. It has to do with Orangemarlin being a jerk, an imposter and a sockpuppet. +You seem not to understand the logic here. Try to focus, or try not to focus, whatever works for someone with your peculiar situation. The SOURCE was DCRTV.com and the information was that DC101 had REPORTED something. The source was reliable (and implicitly accepted as such by you) and the REPORT of DC 101's report was, moreover, true. This is entirely in accord with Wikipedia's rather Stalinesque guidelines on secondary sources, which MOST EMPHATICALLY DO NOT require that what the source reports be true, although in this case it was: DC 101 reported that the Greaseman was dead. By the way, as you know, your ears constitute original research and therefore mean precisely DICK. I'm right, you're wrong, give up and go feed your cats or whatever it is you do. +BLOSSOM!!! BLOSSOM IS ALIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She is Monokulus!!!!- MANGO TOO HAPPY TOO SIGHN +Sure. I'll try not to do so in the future. +" I found that you disregared my notice. DO NOT Revert to Copyvio on this page. You and others on this service seem to be motivated by misguided zealousness in ferreting out ""violations"" whether they exist or not. There is nothing to ""resolve"" on this article. LEAVE IT ALONE! " +Also answer the question I asked stop writing on my talk page. +I found the coords on the zhwiki and added them to the infobox. Cheers! - +Boston characters The articles you've been entering for he Boston public characters are really not supportable by themselves, and I suggest that you try to do the following: Cut back on the plot description When you do describe the plot, do it is with a greater variety of sentence style, avoiding run on sentences and trying to emphasize the most important points add some more on the character interactions add information from the RWW about who played it, and just what shows they appeared in find some sources from reviews of the show that discuss the characters nd add them and then, for the minor characters, merge them into a character list. Another editor nominated them for proposed deletion; I have removed the tags, since deletion is the last resort, but the articles need to be improved to stay in Wikipedia. I'd advise you to add this very quickly, before they all get nominated for regular deletion.'''''' +" I closed it as ""delete without prejudice"" which means that any logged in editor is free to write a new article. However, I will not undelete the article because it was an unsourced biography of a living person. Also, the website you mentioned is not an independent reliable source as it's likely either be a fansite or run by the subject himself. " +(UTC) grow up, common usage is allowed. 20:42, 12 July 2005 +" Cannibalism http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/12/donner.party.ap/index.html This article suggests cannibalism did not happen on the trip. I'd vote that the new studies ( the CNN link doesn't work, http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060109/donnerparty_his.html does) should be noted on the front page, given they are scientific studies and at the very least seem to note legitimate disagreement. -Nate There is ample evidence that cannibalism occurred. The fact that the study did not find evidence of it is not evidence that cannibalism didn't occur. The only evidence they were looking for were cooked bones. If the cannibals simply sliced meat from a body there would be no lasting evidence. While we should mention the study, we shouldn't overplay it. - Further comment: The Alder Creek digs of 2003-2004 do not ""cast doubt"" on Donner Party cannibalism. The archaeologists did not find evidence of cannibalism at Alder Creek, but this is easily explainable. Further, the Alder Creek digs say nothing about other incidents of cannibalism by Donner Party members at the lake camp, among the ""Forlorn Hope"" snowshoers, or at Starved Camp. Survivors said they ate human flesh and rescuers saw the evidence. Donner Party cannibalism is not in doubt among anyone who is familiar with the incident; it's the general public who have misinterpreted the archaeological evidence as ""casting doubt"" on cannibalism. DPL, 6/28/2007 Cannibalism in the Donner Party is not in question. Ten survivors said they ate human flesh. At the Donner family camp at Alder Creek, the Donners told the First Relief that they were going to start eating the bodies of the dead; when the Second Relief arrived at Alder Creek they saw children eating human flesh and mutilated corpses. Three Alder Creek survivors (Georgia Donner, Mary Donner, and Jean-Baptiste Trudeau) said that cannibalism had occurred at the Donner camp. This is not a legend, but a matter of record. People who are unfamiliar with the historical sources are not competent to dismiss them as ""legends."" Kristin Johnson, author Unfortunate Emigrants: Narratives of the Donner Party (Logan: Utah State University Press, 1996). As a little footnote I'd like to add that cannibalism WAS a big part of the story. The website that is footnoted on that sentence shows about 6 episodes of eating people. Some of them ate human flesh for a month! And even the site admits it's a ""brief"" section of their crazy feeding habits! Donner is forever known for eating others and the fact that it wasn't just 1 or 2 bodies, but like approx. 7-8+? really shows that these people had an appetite for homoerectus! 72.219.137.83 As a little footnote, I'd like to add that you don't know what you're talking about. A year elapsed between the time the emigrants left home and the day the last survivor was rescued. With one exception, those who ate human flesh did so for about 2 weeks, some for as little as 2-3 days. Two weeks, out of 52 weeks in a year, IS minor. They did NOT ""develop an appetite for homo erectus"" or a ""crazy eating habit"" they put off eating human flesh for as long as they could, until finally there was absolutely nothing else left to eat. The reason why ""Donner is known forever for eating others"" is because the general public, like the commentator above, exults in its own ignorance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.35.8.13 I would like to point out they weren't eating homo erectus, but homo sapien. lol. In all fairness, I would like to further point out that they were actually eating Homo Sapien's erectus. To my knowledge, this is the only story in American history where a group resorts to eating other members of the group to survive. Supposedly the first to die were murdered for their meat. That makes the cannibalism portion of their journey understandably popular. I would have eaten maybe a shouldercock, but that's it. 16:06, 9 Feb 2010 (Pacific) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.168.177 ==Numb +Where as I wish I had read it somewhere, I regret I did not. I will try to find the source from which the speaker got this information. I learned this during a School History Session and it has been validated by several sources. +Sorry I'm new, it was a stupid question I know, I was just wondering but I now have no idea what you guys are talking about now? When did the topic change from inspiration? +HIIII, HELLO Eclecticology!!! IT'S A GREAT PLEASURE TO SEE YOU! +REDIRECT Talk:2004–2005 ISU Junior Grand Prix +" OOAD/UML COMPLEX SYSTEMS:: Attributess of a complex systems: 1. Hirarchy 2.Primitive component is arbitrary 3.Intra component linkages are stronger than inter component linkages 4.complex systems sub systems- in different combination 5.computer system- evoluated from simple system Some basic concepts & strategies in the study of systems: Abstraction: ``We have developed an exceptionally powerful technique for dealing with complexity. We abstract from it. Unable to master the entirety of a complex object, we choose to ignore the inessential details, dealing instead with the generalized, idealized model of the object"" Wulf in Shaw, 1981). Formality: Rigor at each stage in the development of a system. Divide and conquer: Divide a complex problem into a set of simpler problems that can be solved. Hierarchical ordering: Order the simplification of the problem in ``divide & conquer"" in hierarchies. Cohesion & coupling: Modularise the system such that interactions within components (cohesion) is maximised and interactions between components (coupling) is minimised. This way, the impact of errors, when they arise, is localised and does not cascade through the system. Diagnosis of offending components is also made easier. Information hiding: Each module (or subsystem) must have available to it just the information that is needed by it. Conceptual integrity: Consistency in design. Completeness: Ensuring that the design meets all the specifications. Logical independence: Emphasis on the statement of system objectives in terms of logical functions independent of physical implementation. Correctness & Efficiency: Correct in the sense that the design meets all the user requirements. Efficient in that the system accomplishes the objectives with minimum computing resources." +" Please fix minor typos in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Sanello please. I'll try to be brief as ordered by a Wiki editor who described my Talk entries as ""verbose."" I thought I was just being thorough ) I ran the latest post of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Sanello through Spell Check and found the following typos. Please fix. Thank you very much. Under the heading Libel suitn at attorney William Skrzyniarz' last name is misspelled without a ""y"" http://www.merchantcircle.com/business/Bill.Skrzyniarz.Law.Office.310-786-8207 other typos I make myself all the time even tho I get paid to copy edit mss. written by others. For some reason, many people, including me, accidentally repeat the same word consecutively: Please fix: consquently [sic] ""the jury ruled in favor of the THE [sic] publisher..."" libelled = British spelling libeled = American spelling Wiki's editor used the British spelling. Is that kosher? In the British editions of my books, the publisher used ""unauthoriSed biography"" instead of American ""unauthoriZed biography."" Please fix unless Wiki accepts British spelling. ""England and America are two countries separated by a common language."" G.B. Shaw http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/897.html Hitler is misspelled in Works and references as The Autobiography of Frau Adolf Hitlter: Translated and edited by Frank Sanello. Hitler's name is misspelled several but not all the time. This is very anal-retentive and unimportant. I'm embarrassed to mention this, in fact, but I know Wikipedia is a stickler for formatting and facts. The correct capitalization of my book is Reel V. Real, not Reel v. Real as listed in Works. (Please use a capital ""V."" in Reel V. Real http://www.amazon.com/Reel-V-Real-Hollywood-Fiction/dp/0878332685/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1374239624&sr;=1-3&keywords;=frank+sanello BTW, your OpenLibrary.org also uses a lower-case V in Reel V. Real, if you're interested. I'm not only about Wikipedia. http://openlibrary.org/works/OL2620052W/Reel_v._real Some kind Wikipedia inserted this irrelevant, ""unnotable"" fact in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Sanello ""An advocate of frei kultur or free access to information, the author has donated his early books to OpenLibrary.org, which notes that his Reel v. Real is part of the library collections of Yale, Harvard and Temple Universities. The MLA (Modern Language Association), APA (American Psychological Association), Turabian and the Chicago Manual of Style have cited his work. Sanello has registered with Project Gutenberg in order to submit his books to that free-access site as well."" nonsenseferret was correct in saying the MLA/APA/Turabian citations were ""insubstantial."" All those style manuals do is pre-format bibliography and footnotes in all books submitted to them by OpenLibrary. Please remove this unimportant info from The MLA (Modern Language Association), APA (American Psychological Association), Turabian and the Chicago Manual of Style have cited his work. Editing my Wiki bio has been a huge education for which this 61-year-old computer-challenged man is very grateful to Wikipedia for forcing me to learn software code (?) or whatever. While I was patrolling my own page, I learned I was listed here: The first reference in my bio refers to my age??? and cited by a site I'd never heard of: ^ ""Frank Sanello"". OpenISBN. Retrieved 15 July 2013. http://www.openisbn.com/searchx/frank_sanello/ Openisbn lists all my 19+ books (and punctuates Reel V. Real correctly ) but the site, like OpenLibrary.org has incomplete info about my books, especially OpenLibrary. When I have time between my own books (right now I'm Kindlizing my screenplay about Eugene Bullard, the first African-American military aviator (World War I), I'll update all my books on OpenLibray and OpenISBN. Thanks again, Wipedia, for promoting my career! LOL Wiki already has an article about Bullard.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Bullard After the Kindle and CreateSpace (paperback) editions of my screenplay about Bullard, All Blood Runs Red, I will cite the hell out of it on Wiki's Bullard article to promote the sale of my paperback screenplay because Wiki always displays first in most searches. I'll include Wiki's Bullard article's URL with my book cited in an updated edition of my Bullard bio which can be easily updated on Kindle or CreateSpace with a few key strokes. ) BTW, I'm amazed Wiki accepts books published by CreateSpace, that is, self-publish +" How to cite Please see Wikipedia:cite. It's much easier than the method you did ). In a nutshell, is all you need to do.. generally speaking. If you have any questions I'd be more than happy to help. UDI " +edit to antelope Is there some basis for the changes made to the pronghorn antelope page?????? +" External Links As I explained to you above in May, Wikipedia does not allow external links to book titles. In general, Wikipedia wants only a very few, select number of external links. You can see details at WP:EL. But one rule that's easy to learn is that we (almost) never allow direct links embedded in the article text. All links must be in a separate section at the bottom (below references) called ""External Links"". These links must be about the subject (i.e., about Swirski, not links to individual books he has written), and they must meet the criteria set forth in WP:EL. " +There was a link in the reference section at the bottom, I just forgot to put the little number thing after the actual statement. I apologize. +I have never made a personal attack on Jokestress. Rather, I have pointed out that she is debasing this article and making illiterate and hypocritical edits on it. +" Total Drama Island/Action I finally got Total Drama Island semi-protected. I am happy since they decided to protect it for a month and I only asked for a week. Anyways, I also think Beth is going to win and the other characters in the exact same order as . I am not sure if Owen comes back, but I did see the preview for the next episode and he was in it. However, I think the show is going more downhill now that they are doing Total Drama, the Musical. By the way, on the TDA elimination table, I don't understand why there are so many colors. It only makes it harder to read and more complicated. Plus, for episode 20, there shouldn't be a ""spring green"" because there is no Gilded Chris ceremony. Just something to think about. " +" Google Hits Shalwar Kameez receives more hits(730,000) than salwar kameez. I in good faith assumed you were telling the truth, but i shouldnt have expected anything else from someone who felt ""insulted"" by being called a Pakistani. " +Here it is - there is Sveti Stefan church in Macedonia, also. +" Sponsored links Please stop re-adding pointers to your sponsored websites. This is an encyclopedia, not a way for you to make money from spamming. How can I help? But its MY user page. That means its not an article, its a user page. I can do whatever I want with it. The fact that it's the user page for your user and that you are allowed a lot of freenode with it does not mean you can do whatever you want with it. Please see WP:UP#OWN and, on the specific of my removals, WP:UP#PROMO. The fact that you keep ignoring sound advice from multiple users is not good. Try to take a step back and remember that we're all here to build a collaborative encyclopedia together ) We need to be able to work together ) How can I help? OK, but how do I get a colored name? Like yours. And I put NOT a url shortener. I put a way to get FREE iTunes gift cards. Adf.ly is sponsored url shortener. As for the color, it's simply a font color tag that I use in the signature. I am getting however increasingly worried by your attitude here. I mean, I went back to look at the Bot request page, and you decided to personally attack the users that were trying to help you? I frankly don't really understand what you seek to achieve here. You really need to take a step back and look at what you've done and written here more objectively. I am going to close that thread now, as it's really not productive, but I am really worried. How can I help? Fine. Ok. " +" Yes, and? Those are the facts. A special share of the responsibility should probably go to the Commons community, which has proven itself wilfully unable to tell the difference between (NSFW) this or (NSFW) this or (NSFW) this, and sex-ed material. N466 " +nBy the way, I just wasn't connected when I thought I was. Not being connected is not considered as a crime anywhere on Wikipedia. This is clearly a case of admin abuse of powers and it will have consequences. +nerds attempt to block it? This is communist. +Too big This page is ridiculously large. I have taken the liberty of asking MiszaBot to do something about it. Needless to say, you are at liberty to tell MiszaBot not to. — (talk · contribs) +Scansion The so-called representation of the elegiac couplet's scansion doesn't follow any standard key for such a thing. What the hell are the vertical pipes (|) supposed to mean? I know exactly as much about elegiac couplets after reading this bit as I did before: Nothing. (Hailing Frequencies) +1981, none that said +Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. +Great for an orchestra assignment. Can someone mark this? +You wanna reference? Don't delete factual information. Dane dies at the end of SR2, here's your proof 60.242.127.62 +To the trangie editor, im deeply sorry. I either mucked up the name of the town, or the info i recieved from the CIA was off. Either way, im deeply sorry again. I didnt mean any harm or to vandalism your page. +" Request for third opinion User:Chubbles and myself do not agree on wheter this article should exists or not. Basically the first thread on this talk page gives an idea why. Also, User talk:Tasc0#B.26C_again should be read too. I'll try to make my point simple: A group called Bloods & Crips does not exist. It was actually two groups (Damu Ridas and Nationwide Rip Ridaz) that released these two albums as a collaboration. Not as a single group. It's a zero! " +" Twilight Princess No problem. I was even going to ask for your collaboration (you said ""Looks good. I'll try to help out wherever possible with that"" in the FTC), but I didn't know if it would be possible as you've been quite busy recently. I'll add your co-nom, no problem. After all, a co-nom gave me my third star (and the one I've given more work and am most proud of), and you seem to be wanting one. ≠ Yeah, a star would be nice, too P  (talk) " +dagammit woman! I'm year of the boar too! come on now! get down wid yo bad self!! +Please stop replacing the Concurrent Technologies Corporation page with a company-produced puff paragraph. If you'd like to make real, verified improvements to the page please go ahead. +Modern-day unions could be considered to be rackets as well. 24.141.76.19 +Why do you have to be so mean?! +I don't think this individual has any notoriety of any kind, other than for being caught for various Wikipedia editing infractions. That's pretty much all this page should say about him is that he was a Global Warming activist who got caught gaming Wikipedia. +LOL. Just another example of how great Wikipedia really is. +" The entire ""scientific explanations"" section is bs. What is a ""scientific explanation"" of a folk belief. You may easily list any number of luminescent phenomena which may have helped inspire this folk belief, but by doing so, you are listing luminescent phenomena, you are not discussing the folk belief in question. This article is not called ""list of possible natural light sources in swamps"", it is supposed to discuss a widespread folk belief. The academic discipline responsible for this is folklore studies, not the pseudo-scientific nonsense about owl plumage and swamp gas. (𒁳) " +It's not a matter of what I believe. My belief has nothing to do with it. There were no reliable independent sources references indicating that they met any of the 12 points set fourth. If they did, in fact, meet #'s 4 and 5, where are the sources demonstrating it? Just you stating that they do is not an independent relaiable source. And if the noms had been left open long enough, I think the consensus would have agreed. Wikipedia is not the Hamster-pedia. If you're conficent that they were notable, you should have made a good faith argument in favor of keeping the article, not shutting everything down without any scrutiny. +Request for help from 14 year old I thought I should draw your attention to this post copied from wikipedia Admin Noticeboard as it concern's a 14 year old's worry that he has been contacted on wikipedia by a predator. +Abuse of admin privileges I have caught you vandalizing my user page and user talk page. I don't know who you think you are or who you think I am, but if you don't go back to my user page and undo your vandalism and mark it as vandalism, this is about to get REALLY, REALLY fun for me. ) I know admin privileges are not easy to get and you've probably wasted a large portion of what could have been a useful life achieving that, so I'm thinking this might, just might, be important to you. +May 2007 (UTC) The sequence you describe is not a random variable, but a deterministic concoction of your own. Chebyshev applies to random variables, like price and return. The extent to which they have trends which are determinable, only biases the moving average as an estimator of the mean. - 17:23, 25 +"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Battersea Power Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Looks good. Not sure that ""somewhere in Kent"" is any different than ""in Kent"". Reference format can be improved - will pass after that is fixed. " +May I say it? SYRIAN propaganda! do you want that I'll bring you a quote of Asad telling anti-semitic things,and says that the Jews should be in the sea and not in Palestine or the Golan heights? I think this article should not be related to the local politics; If you wrote this quote I'll write, this anti-semitic things, I don't care how much consensus you have, it ain't fair, and it ain't wikipedy.77.126.147.117 +Unreasonable deletions It would seem that user Abhishek191288 is removing my images without a valid reason. Am undoing his edit & inviting others to give a few comments on the page. +Yeah, I've always wondered where the access was: I'll remove the comment. But I was told this by (I think) Dr Sedley, who lived in A and was cheesed off about it... | Talk +Hye hye, do you remember me? lol well i'm here to ask if you could pass in the portuguese comunity discussion page and left your opinião on the part who says Eurovisão: PT-PT ou PT-BR?, i put the question if the eurovision articles should be written in european protuguese or in more than this one, cheers +Wikinazis are attacking my talk page! Nooo!!! - +REDIRECT Talk:Athanasiou Diakou Street +Thanks but please reblock me, i have no desire to take part on a site which allows a person to be linked to perverted websites, criminals, and racism. None of it has been deleted as i can see it in petris history still. You can block me for abusing multipile accounts or making personal attacks, or block evasion i don`t give a fuck, just get this done and delete that shit that has been associated with my name please +"Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including: The use of a username of your choice The ability to view all your contributions via a ""My contributions"" link Your own user page Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you The ability to rename pages The ability to upload images The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website The eligibility to become an administrator The right to be heard in votes and elections Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users. We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! — Apr. 29, '06 [22:25] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>" +OMG! for the last time, i couldn't care less if you blocked me!!! P +" Name change re wiki naming conventions, ""Badger Mountain"" would be for a mountain, not a ski area, so amended this to reflect that. " +"You don't attack the only person you're having a discussion with and ask for the article to be locked and then defend it by saying, 'well, if your not one - then he's not talking to you'. The accusation is the attack and nothing I've said or done here, nor in my recent edit history at the Republican congressman's article referenced above indicates any bias. I notice however that the home page of one of the two editors standing sentry over his pet article has dozens of claims of profound liberal bias proudly festooned across the page like a Volvo in Vermont on it's way to the Northeast Kingdom. One usually finds such committed and messianic people to be deeply wedded to their cause and saturated to the bone with inflexible bias - whether on the left, right or third way. False unsubstantiated accusations, blatant bias, article ""ownership"" and the complete lack of any effort to defend the inclusion of drivel, garbage and fluff into the encyclopedia is ridiculous and nothing more has been done by the ""guards"" than revert, attack and ignore.99.141.246.39 " +If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +whats wrong with the image of 1914. Also you have a great desire to mention a specific theory of Vlach origin, which are not entirely adopted, see origins of Vlachs. +Please restore the page so an article can be constructed. Thank you. +eat a dick is an apt insult not an attack a ddos would be an attack, knifing the bitch would be an attack telling her to eat a dick is what she deserves if she is gonna go around harrasing people... +Okay, that's funny. +You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. // talk +color of plates why does my state have two different color lettering for thier plate? +" Congratulations on another TFA.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld " +dude wtf I was cleaning off some junk that slipped in when I copypasted my stuff so I could add a comment when someone else edited while I was typing, wtf? +please help with new article (categories and such) - thank you John_D._Axtell +It seems you wrote: I changed it to +It's not just the evolution from a G3 to a G4, but that he used these Macs consistently for all these works. For film, for TV, for plays. I'm going to frame the paragraph better. It's a collection of facts right now, when I'm actually trying to convey an idea. I'll see what I can do.- +polar bears are completely purple and have scales.` +Jiang, you're quite confused. Where does it say I've backed off? I cited Fairbanks as a prime example of someone who uses it in the third sense. You've also quite erroneously mixed up what wikipedia policy says about definitions. The intent is to prevent extremely short articles, and for them, it suggests that you extend them. It also tries to group very related terms together. Chinese Republic is related to different things, depending on the context of where a person might have read about it or what point of view the person is coming from. Republican China, for example, we agreed to point to History of the ROC since it is most appropriate for someone looking for something about . But for someone who says Chinese Republic means the ROC exactly, we can't point him there, we have to point him towards ROC. And then there's the third definiton that means something else entirely. +":::::If you can't explain yourself and add some substance to your claims that the article is ""screaming PoV"", then I suggest you should stop wasting the editors time here. " +You are engaging in disruptive editing. I protest against the crude pro-Ukrainian government propaganda perpetrated on Arseniy Yatsenyuk. You are pushing the anti-Russian POV that has nothing to do with a balanced, objective presentation. Must be a paid shill. 71.39.6.142 +I'd Do Anything Haha, no surprise that you'd be rooting for Jodie. Can't say I blame you, as she'd be in my top two as well. Still, I'd have to go for Sam (or the Manx Minx, as I have dubbed her). – Jay +Oops I was moving images to the Commons, and deleting images here that exist on the Commons (in accordance with Talk:Wikimedia Commons), and I made a big mistake. I deleted Image:Buddhabrot-deep.jpg, which doesn't exist on the Commons. (The png version is still there.) I expect my talk page to be flooded with angry messages any minute now. Can you restore it please? I'll be much more careful in the future. – (talk) (sleuth) 18:49, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! khoi " +" Notes Using Note b as an example, I'll try to illustrate what I have in mind. Here is the note as it is now: Here is a modest step in what I would consider to be the right direction: Here is a more extensive revision: One could even delete the note in its entirety. Disposition of behavior citations This was originally part of this subsection, but it looks as if this issue will be easier to follow in its own level-2 section. Relating to this article section and its references: Phineas Gage#Exaggeration and distortion of mental changes I've placed the references in five groups each with a headline. I think the next step is to decide which references are not needed in order to support the list in the article +Removed link When I tried to add the turkish lang ext. it said there was spam protection for the infonet.com.br link, so I removed it. +You are not an Admin And you never will be because you have no idea what vandalism is and you do not respect opposing viewpoints. Any edit that you do not agree with is not vandalsim. Now stop vandalising my user page and stop stalking me. +Melissa Farley RfC Talk: Melissa_Farley: RfC: NPOV and BLP issues? Thought you might be interested. +" CFB BORDEN The mission of Canadian Forces Base Borden (CFB Borden) is to support all of its customers in the most cost effective manner to enable them to accomplish their missions. These ""customers"" include several military training establishments and a variety of other military and civilian organizations located on the base. The Base Commander of CFB Borden is Colonel Stewart E. Moore. Colonel Moore also serves as the Commander of Canadian Forces Support Training Group. The Canadian Forces Support Training Group validates, coordinates and delivers all common support occupation training for the Canadian Forces. On average, CFB Borden trains 15,000 military personnel annually. CFB Borden employs approximately 3,250 military members and approximately 1,500 civilians CFB Borden is located approximately 100 Km north of Toronto, in the heart of Simcoe County, one of the major tourist areas in Ontario. CFB Borden is ideally located to service personnel from all across Canada. The base is a major economic entity in Simcoe County and enjoys excellent relations with the surrounding local communities- http://www.borden.forces.gc.ca/cfb_borden/index_e.asp SO IT IS A BASE! and its by Tronto- Canadian Forces Captain Catlin (AKA Dell970)" +You are a cunt Don't even think about blocking me. +" The Mahdi and ad-Dajjal section is off topic for this article This section deals with events that precede the day of judgement and are outside the scope of the article, which is only a survey of the Muslim narrative of the Day of Judgement. non-NPOV + inaccurate information Regarding the piece of text ""Since most of those hadith are on the authority of Abu Huraira, most Shia dismiss them as a sad examples of what happens when all Sahaba are counted as trustworthy: A clear breach in Tawhid, the belief that God is above its creation."" Reasons for removal: Abu Huraira is one of the most prolific muhaddithin and a source of many of the sahih hadith. The phrase ""most shia"" does not cite any authority or text and could therefore be completely fabricated. Not to mention that there are over a dozen subsects among the shi`a. ""sad examples of what happens"" <- that's a non-NPOV (non-Neutral Point Of View) See God as one sees the full moon or the sun in the sky. Or seeing part of God on the day of judgement is not a contradiction that God is above His (not ""its"") creatures in every respect. " +"::I don't think liberation *necessarily* has to do with a foreign country being the governing body. The US *is* a foreign army in another country and they've been there since 2003 so I believe that makes them a semi-permanent occupying army. Regardless, of all this I like the quote it is now. The quote as it is now is simply a quote by Hussein's daughter which can be taken at its own context. It's a response by one person and there are responses by MANY people on the page which reflect a wide variety of opinions. This is how proper unbiased news articles look. There's a quote without any editorializing. Add ""liberated"" and there's editorializing. That's like writing an article about Wikipedia and writing ''Wikipedia is an ""encyclopedia"" and there are many ""interesting"" articles. All I'm saying is don't go nuts with the quotation marks and get all snarky.Apples99 " +See WP:OWN. Have a nice life and don't come by me again. +even read what I wrote before??? +I also just noticed: he simultaneously went after these same articles on the french Wikipedia, where he has ALSO been banned. See , for example. As I've said before, this editor simply refuses to give up, no matter how many warnings he is given. +":::* I'm not using jabs or insults of any kind. ""Greek-centric"" means ""centered on Greece or concerns relating thereto"". That's an accurate description of the view that things relating to Greece use words (in English) derived from Greek-language Hellas on the basis that Greeks themselves prefer this term. If this were a discussion about Germans wanting everything about Germany to use Deutsche in English too, that would be a German-centric concern (i.a. a concern centered on Germany, Germans, and their preferences). NB: I actually know Germans who insist that we should stop saying ""German"" and ""Germany"" (and that the Spanish should stop using Alemán), and everyone use ""Deutsche"" and ""Deutschland"", so, no, it is not a red herring fallacy at all, but a comparison chosen carefully (though not carefully enough; see a bit later). Your own counter however, is a straw man fallacy; no one said anything about transliterating vs. not transliterating, so the ""Ελλάς"" argument is a complete non sequitur. I do agree that Hellenic is an English word, and concede the point that the Deutsche comparison wasn't very apt after all; I was focused more on the situational than linguistic similarity when I chose it. A better example would be expecting our articles about Japan and the Japanese to use Nippon and Nipponese to better match the native name of the country; these are in fact words in English. It would actually make sense to do that than to do what's been proposed here, because ""Nipponese"" has no confusing alternative meaning, unlike ""Hellenic"" which commonly, probably commonly, refers to ancient Greek culture in English, not modern.  —  ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  " +"*::I've outlined some of my reasoning here and on other pages. Everything I've done has been with the goal of helping Wikipedia. At this point, I don't feel the need to continue debating this point. I feel the block was completely appropriate, but, quite honestly, is a bit of a technicality. Obviously her edits will be monitored closely from here on out (if she edits at all, which I doubt). I'm dropping this matter entirely, and I hope you will do the same. " +" That's nearly there. It should be ""| last = Peel| first = John"", and the ""authorlink"" gets filled in automatically. But if you're co-crediting Sheila, which I think is proper, it you need to add in ""last2 = Ravenscroft | first2 = Sheila | author2-link = "" after the above fields. Let me know if you get stuck, and congratulations for giving up law. Apart from the money, I haven't regretted it. '''''' (Talk) " +Please keep this page current. +02:14, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) +I'm sure it's true - I bet he does make it harder on himself by letting everyone know how young he is. I know I'm a lot less likely to listen to some little kid with braces and zits on his face. Not that FireFox does, necessarily, but that's image a lot of people are going to have. +" Oh dear. So I come home from a hard day at the office to find that you have yet again caused everyone hassle regarding me. After countless badgering warnings* on my talkpage, and two blocks of me within the space of a day, both of which were overturned, you decided to come back for one more try. Can we now take it that you have a longstanding dispute with me and are this inappropriately placed to block me in future? *I have carefully avoided using the word ""harassment"" because I am fully aware of WP:HA#NOT and am trying to assume good faith, but you should be aware of quite how close a thing it was. ╟─Tag►First Secretary of State─╢ " +I resent being berated by some 'know it all' who goes off half-cocked. >:| +" Nevermind. You should be flattered that he watchlists your page with each new sock! He must like you! Cheers ) talk " +and defamatory remarks +":::I have already responded to most of these concerns in my reply to Twerges below. Re your comment about leaving a link in the ""See Also"" section, I am still not persuaded that even that much is justified but I'm not going to contest it at the moment. I think there are probably a number of links that could be added to this article, that's one of the things that will require more consideration. " +" tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC channel to get real-time help. (Click here for instant access.) and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) " +Why does IGN list it as M then? I have no idea, IGN is usually very reliable, but XBOX is too....72.138.216.89 +" Zbigniew Brzezinski pronunciation Hi, I've been enjoying your Polish audio samples. When you get some time, could you do one for Zbigniew Brzezinski? There's no urgency to it but maybe you could add it to your ""eventually"" list. He is still on American TV occasionally, and I think the US interviewers mangle his name pretty badly. 67.117.145.9 " +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.18.191 " +PriceWaterhouseCoopers state that accountants in 283 countries implement IFRS as of June 2014. Here is the reference: http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/issues/ifrs-reporting/publications/assets/pwc-ifrs-by-country-2014.pdf That means that all accountants in the world implement the IASB's definition, namely 100% cumulative inflation over three years. PriceWaterhouseCoopers is a very reliable source. The PWC source is thus a very reliable source of the prevalence of the IASB's definition. The fact that all governments follow the IASB´s definition is thus now reliably referenced as well as relevant. I maintain my position that I can thus remove the said sentence as a reliable source has now been found that all accountants and all governments in the world follow the IASB´s definition. That is overwhelming proof that the IASB´s definition is the prevalent defintion. 195.23.41.216 +" Ozgoodelawyer Guy = 1D10T This ozgoodelawyer guy is a bloody idiot who think this is place for to write his own story book. I thin we should ban this guy. He think he know everythin about because he a ""lawyer"" hahaha. Get real man. We have right to edit this too. Everyday he change evrything he dont like. Sombady pelase ban this idiot. " +" For the final time, Ma'am, I wish not to speak to you or have a conversation with you. If you can learn to speak the English language, learn to spell ""American"" and not get me obviously confused with this Homer fellow, then I would be happy to speak with you, but until you can grow the slightest amount of maturity and learn some manners, we haven't anything to speak about. Good Day to you, Ma'am. - " +Then you need to get laid in the ass badly so you're not such a cunt like this tommorrow 142.163.116.73 +":::Mudblood is meant to be AS offensive as the n-word without actually being the n-word; so in a sense, you're correct. In the series, it's used the same way: as an inflamatory insult brought out by the hatred of someone's liniage. But simply beacause you see mudblood and think ""n-word"" says more about your personal perceptions than it does the intended use of the word. " +" For questions regarding Satanism You are better off researching the information yourself. All the information is contained in a work called Torah, and the Zohar and the Quran. The Goetia, the ""Keys"" of solomon, are just that in the spirit of Solomon. Let me spell this out for the simpleton amongst us. Solomon was Israeli. The Israeli are Arabic. You have to go to the source of the information. YOu can't just go to churchofcrackheads . com and talk to lucifer. Don't work that way. You need to research and do real honest to God spiritual inquiry, taking into accounts ALL physical information. IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND IT doesn't mean someone else cannot. Ha-satan is an 'evil spirit of God' not a seperate entity, not a physical manifestation. Evil, as in wicked. Wicked as a man, but not of flesh. You're not going to find a source anywhere on ""the internet"" that stems from the very same tree as what you seek. If your seeking for these seeds of knowledge. You have to find the right fruit. IF you know what fruit you seek. You ONLY need to find the TREE." +" A serious question You obviously enjoy being as nasty as you possibly can be in ""acceptable"" ways that don't threaten to get you blocked. My question is don't you ever get tired of being dead wrong about so many things, so often, in such a needlessly nasty manner, and so publicly in front of your fellow editors? Vandals suck. Eight year olds with access to the internet suck too. But it's people like you who maintain a facade of respectability while being absolutely horrible to other people who are really the worst members of the Wikipedia community. - " +" Ofthehighest (Eternity Clause) It has become very apparent to me that I have been wrongfully censored here on Wikipedia, first by Lone boatman and then suddenly by several other editors who jumped on Lone boatman's bandwagon today - endorsing his changing the topic of the article to one already called ""entrenched clauses"". The 'eternity clause' article is specifically about the German 'eternity clause,' and it has a German equivalent called ""Ewigkeitsklausel"". Lone boatman did this because he was angry that I corrected him for synthesizing when changing (removing) the word ""democracy"" and replacing it with ""constitution"". Then another editor (Bdb484) deleted the 'eternity clause' article entirely without even discussing it on the talk page. I went to much work to reference everything in the article. What is interesting is that these additional editors (three of them) all showed up today. They had never been on the page before, but all acted quickly in agreeing with Lone boatman and vandalizing the page. " +Another? Isn't there a short story by French writer Guy de Maupassant that has exactly the same plot, but involving a Frenchman and the Prussian army during the Franco-Prussian War? Tim in Canada +I really appreciate it +Thank you for your response. You have answered my questions perfectly. +"the article states that a wormhole would allow travel from one universe to another universe. but, since there is only one universe, how is that possible? i was under the impression that we live in ""the universe"" not ""a universe"". " +The current Signpost suggests we will be seeing Lua a lot sooner than expected, perhaps this month. (Lua is a programming language that will be callable by a template, and which drastically speeds up stuff like the refs being discussed here, although of course it will take ages to code and test.) +" ''Grumpyness, and an inability to see across related fields of research, using a synthesis of known, and yet to be discovered knowlege, IS RELATED! Encyclopedic knowlege is by definition, dogma. Intellectually accepted teachings that won't get our instructors burned at the stake becomes ""history"" (and yet there will still be battles in pockets of ""flatland""). " +" My RfA Hi Fadix! Merci, Choukran and Thank you for your kind support on my [Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/FayssalF|RfA]].  Wiki me up™" +" I am also bewildered and surprised by your comments of ""giving religious people a bad name."" I do not understand. How could a lack of desire to read these horror comics be offensive to other God-worshipping US citizens? I am sorry, but I am quite disgusted at your comments. How could you even understand the concept of faith? Are you religious? If so, I can tell you that reading Marvel Zombies may not comply with the rules of certain faiths...just please stop arguing...God..." +I need your help I need your help +ok hectorine, oh sorry hec.. whatever. +" More agreement with User:Mkdw Hello. I also agree with Mkdw's view of notability being required for an entry in this list. There are literally hundreds of internet-based chess servers. We should keep the list to those servers that have demonstrated notability sufficient to deserve an article on Wikipedia according to its own standards for notability. Like said earlier, this is not an issue of a ""hypothetical problem,"" or simply put, ""If it aint broke dont fix it,"" but an issue of Wikipedia policies and standards. Thank you. " +Seems a reasonable request reasonable to me. +" You care about it, as apodictically demonstrated by the fact that you responded and that you changed one of your less-than-literate edits. Regarding the bias and illogic of your edit, the excuse in your edit summary doesn't make sense, as it doesn't explain why you deleted mention of Prof. Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory, particularly since you yourself called Deutsch an ""eminent physicist"" in your own edit (i.e., that statement wasn't there before): of which argues against the notion that you consider the physics of the Omega Point Theory as fringe. Further, you deleted mention of the fact that Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the leading theologians in the world, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory and Tipler's position that the Omega Point is consistent with the Judeo-Christian God. So by your own words, you must consider Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory to be noteworthy, and yet you deleted mention of this endoresement in an area where you yourself agree that Deutsch is eminently qualified and replaced it with a large displayed quotation regarding a matter that Deutsch has no qualification or erudition in, even though the previous version already clearly mentioned that Deutsch disagrees that Omega Point is God. Moreover, in this edit you delete all mention of the fact that an actual trained theologian, Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the world's leading theologians, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory. Your edit is so ridiculously biased and illogical that it's a sick joke.74.4.222.208 " +Excellent searching, Tom, and thanks to whoever did the translation. +" Dougie...You ARE wasting your time! (On possibly everything ""Wiki"" that you do!) You left a sever's testimony for me! I don't like SamEV and I'm beginning to not like you! Kindly do the same thing that I told SamEV...Stay OFF my talk page! You're NOT welcome here!" +" Removals I've once again removed the victims list. It's not appropriate for an encyclopedia article...this isn't a newspaper. Second, I've remove the comparisons section, as the first paragraph merely restated material already found here, and the second was just an overview of the 2007 article. SA entry is sufficient ''''''Speaketh " +(of which you are a senior editor) +The view that it's a part of India is Indian point of view. That's why the dispute exists. Is it that hard to understand? +Ken Hovind Copyrighted Image A copyright violation has procedures to go though, you cant just remove the copyright violation tag.71.217.206.152 +The 3RR Rule fails. - +" You display your ignorance. The dim bulb in question was paranoid and he was stupid, the classic definitions without a shade of exaggeration. An accurate description isn't an insult, censor. Why you people feel the need to interfere when you don't understand is beyond me. When cletus wrote his stupid paranoid schlock viz ""I do not support the interjection of ""However, this accomplishment was short live."" That does not make sense. That sentence takes away from his great accomplishment. It infers that he did something wrong or something happened and he did not act. It has a negative connotation. What is the point of that sentence? There should be an entire section devoted to his accomplishment of paying off the national debt. Subtle propaganda The diction does not make sense and should be changed or removed."" That is paranoid and stupid. In fact if you're censoring me surely that garbage should also have been censored on the grounds that it is incoherent babble or whatever euphemism you censors use." +"::Yes, indeed, but I can change IP just by rebooting my modem after an ipconfig/release in C-prompt if I so wish it. You'd either have to sock or sit out a block whereas I can either wait as long as the block or not at all, depends on how log it is and when I want to edit; no website can block visitors effectively if you're savvy enough. Even better, my ISP can jumps range when you do that, so rangeblocks are useless. One of life's little bonuses of being anonymous is that IPs are like stars, there are billions of them, mostly unnamed. I guess that's why you favour ""mandatory registration"" which explains a lot in terms of your attitude and resentment when IPs edit articles on your watchlist. You revert anon-edits quicker than my pulse beats. ;) ~~~~ " +To quote Malcolm Reynolds: That's what makes us special. Peachy. 00:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) +":Redthoreau, your contribution above in this section was highly interesting and educational, and hence was very appreciated. I have accepted most of your reasoning and as a result have decided not to repeat my sins and leave this article alone. But this last paragraph of yours (on those three Wikipedia policies) is nothing else than a spanking. All I did was to try to involve a very notable editor, fluent in Spanish, and familiar with current Latin American affairs, into this small controversy. Whatever the motivation, 'altering' (that is, editing) a Wikipedia article by adding true content is an absolutely legitimate endeavor, hence deserving respect. Which reminds me of an old itch, the scandalous contrast between fact and opinion in this encyclopedia. In Wikipedia opinions (sustained by references, namely, by other's opinions) seem to be valued better than facts, an impression that is frequently reinforced by the language used in discussions like this one. I remind you of the small detail that you have still not addressed the Third item in my preliminary response: (sic)""...the objective of having Wikipedia tell the truth, which doesn't appear to be among the most important objectives or goals of this Encyclopedia (if it is, I'd appreciate anyone's help and tell me about it)."" As an aid in a presumably desirable quest for the truth, I'd recommend the article The Killing Machine: Che Guevara, from Communist Firebrand to Capitalist Brand by the notable writer Álvaro Vargas Llosa, besides, of course, some of his books, which in all likelihood you are already familiar with. Regards, " +of killing all the jews +" Yes. The borsalino hats were founded through ""Lapin"", aka Rabbit, fur. They later expanded their top of the line hats to utilize beavers (I have no idea why yet), leaving rabbit as the ""standard"" and felt or faux fur for the cheap hats. " +" I'm going to break for a few hours and return in the hopes that you will either have marshaled an argument why we should prefer the headphones photo, or given up on that photo. Almost five thousand words and I don't think I've heard one yet. I'm glad that you found Thargor's argument more compelling; I didn't feel the need to repeat things he has already said. What's more, if you find his argument compelling it's most perplexing that you continue to insist on the outdated ""younger, smaller Michael Brown"" that your eyes have so much trouble seeing. (talk) (contribs) " +Alright, but what's so bad when those good-faith reverts could help us reach a consensus? Anyway, I take note of that for future disputes. +" Article needs review by nuclear physicist(s) Just skimming the introduction I found three rather significant factual errors which I corrected. I review those here. The first point was that the article insisted that fusion occurs between like-charged atomic nuclei, but this limitation is not true. For example, a nuclear reaction of 12C+16O can proceed through the fusion channel, yet their atomic charge differs. There are literally hundreds of such cases, and citation would be gregarious and seems unnecessary (but I can link a few articles if anyone disputes this point). The article suggested that two protons can fuse, and even suggested that such a reaction is governed by the nuclear strong force. Not true. p+p->d is a weak interaction, because you must convert a proton into a neutron. Weak interactions are not fusion. This error leads to a more general point. Simply putting nuclei together to make something heavier does not constitute fusion. A common misconception is that nuclear fusion refers to any coalescence of nuclei, but in nuclear physics, fusion is a specific reaction mechanism. I will need to confirm, but I believe that, for example, the reactions in the CNO cycles proceed mainly through radiative capture, which isn't fusion. I can find comments in the introduction instructing me not to correct the ""general"" statement about nucleosynthesis, but the point is that this is generalized so much that it is incorrect. I can even find comments there saying not to link to the s-process, but the s-process does not involve fusion reactions as far as I know. There are actually a rather limited number of stellar nucleosynthesis cases that actually proceed through the fusion mechanism, such as carbon burning and oxygen burning. These are literally the only two examples I can think of off hand that I'm sure proceed via fusion. All the rest I'm fairly dubious about at the moment, although some of the pp-chain reactions may also be fusion. Thus, we in fact need likely a whole section explaining the nuclear physics of fusion and what it is and what it is not. Finally, I noticed that the article suggested humans have never controlled fusion. This is naff. There are plenty of nuclear physics experiments which have not only controlled fusion, but made very careful measurements of the properties of the fusion mechanism at many energy scales. Clearly, the writer wanted to imply that fusion as a source of stable source of energy has never been achieved by humans, so this was changed to reflect that point. But given that I could find a serious physics error in every paragraph I read so far, clearly this article needs some serious attention Please do not revert my corrections without discussing the matter here or explicit citation indicating that I am incorrect. " +OK, I'll leave it to your discretion. I've been creating articles on various past and present Olympians, and I've found red links to be useful in that regard, but I also see your point about many of them being destined to remain red links indefinitely. +REDIRECT Talk:Illinois Central Gulf commuter rail accident +""" I agree fully "" " +REDIRECT Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mérida-Badajoz +Sure, that would be fine by me ... but maybe wait a day or two so other editors that participated in the RfC have an opportunity to object (or otherwise comment). +" original research this looks like original research to me, esp. the first paragraph. maybe some cited content will appear but after the ""cool"" ""african philosophy"" fiasco i'm not so hopeful. " +Please don't help me with this article, I can it self. +" AFR rouY you are quite welcome dude... enjoy the mop... theres a lot of cleaning to do.  ™ " +You're right next time i will provide a reference sorry for the inconvenience. 100.40.27.236 +Thanks WLU. I have tried to find the book - it's very truncated on google books, so I am trying to find it in a library. I will def. take a look and discuss. Certainly the points and views held by this book are representative of a number of medical professionals. Will return to the topic once I find it. +Hi , I'm rather confused here. Are you not the author of that paragraph? I only added it to Criticism of Wikipedia to remove it from Wikipedia, effectively moving it to a more specific location. +" They recently (yesterday) hired a new ""Chief Communications Officer"" [Katherine Maher] but are still in process of finding a New Executive Director for WMF ....on the 25th, the job posting was taken off and this was posted by Jan Barte on meta As mentioned before we have taken a different tactic in finding new candidates and we have met with several people and we have had several meetings with candidates with two or more members of the Transition Team. We are at a point where we have three candidates that we all feel are great. We hope to speak to them in the coming week or two and hope to go into the final process (reference checking, terms negotiation etc.) after that. We would then likely be looking to announce the new ED in May. Sue touched upon this subject during the Metrics update which took place on March 6th. Jan-Bart de Vreede " +Why is the q&A; regarding her book being deleted? Those are her exact words in response to the questions about the inaccuracies in her book. I can forward the email from her if need be. +" Can't sleep, clown will eat me The last time he was here was March 31 last year. I think it's unlikely you'll get a response. Shadow " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Good edit to 4 Kids Entertainment, btw. +This Fox platform article is someone's a dream up crap.. do a little research on Ford and Mustangs before posting. +http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/electrical-engineering/9788131760901/1-transformers/navpoint-62 says 'Let the turns ratio be ‘a’.' No evidence of original research on my part here. +It wouldn't be disinformation to allow 10% of the article space - which at the moment reads like a eulogy - to a representative selection of scholarly reception for these theories. +" November 2010 (UTC) I understand Eliot Freidson to be an excellent source, and she is cited by Larson as well (e.g. see page 7 & 8 for a direct quotations for her 1977 essay Health and the Division of Labour): ""..ideal type constructions do not tell us what a profession is, only what it intends to be...my intention is to show how the occupations we call professions organized themselves to attain market power."" I think we can still use Larson, because her book provides more than sufficient coverage to extend the defintion to include these points. So if we extend the defintion further using the content of pages x and xi of her book , we get: ""A profession is an in a service oriented occupation that is centered on a body of knowledge, techniques or skills that have been mastered through training, whose members form a community who share a relatively permanent affiliation through professional associations, professional schools, and a self-administered code of ethics. The specific attributes of an ideal type profession may vary, but the characteristics that make it a distinctive from other occupation are the privalege of autonomy derived from self-regulation and the prestige of having special competence."" Of course we cannot cover all the bases in the lead paragraph - this is simply the starting point, and these characteristics will be expanded upon subsequently. The choice of wording for this summary of Larson is my own, but this can be changed if it defective in any way. Perhaps we could split the definition between Larson and Freidson or even throw Perks into the mix. Again, I am open to suggestions on this defintion can be improved upon. (talk|contribs) 10:57, 3" +, wow, good snag.. +Also, Bibi should not be in the picture, he is hated by many in Israel and he's probably the worse Prime Minister ever! +Once again, sources? Look up Devadasi on UN.org, the UN describes the dalit girls as VICTIMS, and the practice as a form of prostitution. If HRW and the UN are anti-Hindu, who's reliable? +Hello Bluerasberry, yes I am in charge of Communications for the ACTG and wanted to update the page with a few more dates to make the history section more current. I am new to Wikipedia and any assistance posting would be appreciated. How can I post these changes without them being deleted? ACTGNetwork +Litvyak claims Yes, there is not evidence in all the books that I quoted... I think is a mistake, the problem is that the quoted article in I think in Hungarian... and I wonder who could have added it... You mean that I can remove it? I am a little scared of the possible reactions of Binkesternet, he seems to have take care of the article in the past +This section placed here by Fyslee, related to above discussion. +Everything I said about Merle was true. I did forget to mention a few things though, like how he got a mail order bride from Russia after the USSR collapsed, and she left him once she got papers, how he was bailed out after getting arrested for soliciting a prostitute, etc. etc. +"You are missing the point that several people have been trying to make. These spoilers are completely unneeded. The main page isn't supposed to include summaries for every single character in a series, especially when it has as many characters as Umineko. In cases where too many characters are being included on the main page, it is proper to make a seperate page for characters and leave only the main characters on the main page. That would be the Ushiromiya family, the servants, and Beatrice. Also, just because you can include spoilers, does not mean you should go overboard. Spoilers like ""George has an interest in Shannon"" or ""Maria seems at times to have a darker side"" are perfectly fine, but spoilers like ""Eva becomes a witch in Episode 3"" or ""Kanon was created by Kinzo"" are not necessary on the main page character summaries. What good is Wikipedia as an encyclopedia if people are too afraid to read it for anything involving a story? " +Courtesy call Hello Michael, I have removed the Resolved tag which you placed on the Admins' Noticeboard article where you called me a a wiki-stalker. For ease of accesss i have recorded the section here where I explain why I have recorded it. Cheers. +December 2011 If you vandalize Wikipedia again, like you did to J2 Communications you will be banned! 96.48.13.234 +Vandalism to Lomilomi Do not vandalize Wikipedia. Thank you. +One last thing I will say, is thanks for at least having the balls to answer the question in the open, unlike the rest of the Arbcom (with the exception of FloNight) who have completely ignored the situation for the last 3 months. That at least shows a shred of decency on your part, and I will thank you for that. Dialogue Stalk me +Best response ever ◔̯◔ +Not appreciated This editsummary was not appreciated. If you removed the references and made another edit to the template in the time that I removed the references, that is called a edit conflict, not disruptive editing. +If they keep it up I will just semi-protect the article. (talk) +BerksGuy I'm want you to know that if this user keeps it up with his lies about me on his user/discussion page and you continue to condone it I will resort to Legal action to solve the problem. The guy is a political hack for the mayor of Reading, PA, and is resorting to character smears. This does not belong on Wikipedia, and he needs to take it elsewhere. Thank You. +" First off, your baseless accusations. You accused me of bad faith. Precious. As recently as yesterday you refereed to the inclusion of Dado Prso's first name in the article (as is the case on hundreds of other sportspeople bios throughout Wiki), as a ""Serb nationalist talking point"", a ""thinly veiled political advocacy"", and an ""unverified Serbian name claim"", also back in 2006 you were dismissive of the AFP source, at one point even calling for Prso's ID scan. When I brought this up, your response was calling it a figment of my imagination and making ridiculous accusations of bad faith!? You also accused me of proving a point, basing it on my mere presence here. The only reason I'm here posting on this page now is your removal of Prso's first name based on a claim that its inclusion is "" tendentious & unreferenced"". Clearly there are and there have been references on this page all along. Frankly I found it extremely unlikely that someone as nit-picky and anal as you would fail to notice the references on the talk page when you removed the first name from the article, but I guess it's possible. Also, as per your ""I (Joy) didn't overlook anything - none of these links were referenced in the article or in the talk page"" claim, it is not true. The first three links I presented to you just above have been on this talk page page for 8 years (and the AFP story from the FIFA official page is among them) and you clearly were aware of them back in 2006 as the ANON referenced them when addressing you directly and you even mention some explicitly yourself in your responses. So assuming in good faith that your failure to notice them now in 2014 was an honest oversight on your part I have to inform you once again that you DID overlook them because they've been here all this time. For the dissection of the Nezavisne ref, I'm not even sure what you're pushing and arguing for there. Nobody on this page, least of all me, has disputed that he goes by Dado (the article is called Dado Prso in case you failed to notice that too) so why you felt compelled to argue that is beyond me. From the best that I could gather, you don't want his first name Miladin in the intro, but you can live with it in the 'early career' section and you're basing all of this this on the fact that when you total them up most references are to Dado and Miladin, which is completely ridiculous, IF this is what you're arguing for (if not forget the previous sentence). Yes, of course they're to Dado, this is what he goes by, but that doesn't negate his first name. " +The determination was the the community did not want an article on her. AFD admins do not rule on the content itself (whether or not she was notable), just if the community wants the article kept or not. '''''' talk +" C: Rule changes copy edit Q: What means ""copy edit""? C: I'm assuming the rib means the bench. A: Yes, I mean bench. Q: What is the player booth? And what do you mean by ""leaders""? A: Talking about the player booth, I mean where the players are when they are not on the ice. Not sure about the translation here. And leaders, I mean the head coach, assistant coach, goaltending coach, etc. Maybe ""Eight coaches"" would be a proper translation. Mid (contributions) C = Citation Q = Question A = Answer /Mid (contributions) " +" I also highly suggest that you do not do this, or anything like that, again. Logging out to evade your block is expressly forbidden. Do you really want your IP blocked for a year?— dαlus Contribs " +Alert: Banned User This user has been permanently banned: ~ +" I like your different section headings, but there are a few grammatical errors. There should be a comma after Dolan in the introduction paragraph. Perhaps you could add a picture of the theatre. In the early years section after ""$3 million"" the with of ""with Dolan"" should be lower case. I can see you are not done writing or editing your topic. Make sure that you include internal citations! " +No language is perfect. The Perl article has very little criticism, although Talk:Perl#Criticism_.26_Bias it should have. I must disagree about whitespace; some people hate it, but as a professional language trainer the improvement in beginners' code is demonstrable. Yes, Python is not without its warts. Constructive, referenced edits are always welcome. +Why??? You said i was editing wrongly when i wasn't so i want an opology u silly cunt you can f**k off for all i care get a life dick head +you suck you suck as in cock thanks bye +"Hi again MjolnirPants. Sorry again, but keeps tagging the image as too large. Last time the bot did not respond in 24 hours and I have doubts if it will respond this time. Can you possibly upload a satisfactory resolution, but not ridiculously low, so that this tag-warring can be finished? Thank you again.  λόγοςπράξις " +Hm...dont know if this is correct. I think German can be considered as world language, specialy the influence in the EU and in east-europe is still very high. It got the second biggest numbers of total-speakers in the EU. In Namibia is also a high number of german speakers and in the USA are also many german minorities (Amish). (And 1/6 of the americans got germand descendents)Contributions/84.161.73.223 +What source is the higher Russian figure? +" If you think there is sock puppetry going on, then please submit an SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations#Submitting an SPI case, using one of the two forms below; the left one is for submitting an SPI without a CheckUser request, while the right one is for including a CheckUser request (see WP:CHECKUSER for more information on that). Replace ""SOCKMASTER"" with whomever is behind all the sock puppet accounts, click the button, fill in the suspected sock puppets as indicated in the edit box. Include your evidence, and then save the page without including a heading (that's already provided for you). If you have any other questions, let me know. –MuZemike " +Chaldeans are Assyrians But some don't wish to be called so. +" READY TO FUCK YOU UP OLD SCHOOL """" See the inviting place with it's friendly and fair administrators ready to give you an olde time wiki welcome. See the how this admin feels about wikilov This admin , a Democrat cyber thug, banns me due to differences in writing style. Gamaliel uses this place as a sword for his own power drunk political agenda. Gamaliel have absolutely no evidence to say I'm a ""sock of joehazleton"" other then The asinine ""duck test"" I would call the duck test an litmus test of any editor, which edits on political bio. If you don't follow the Gamaliel's radical democrat ideology test, you are then labeled a sock of Joehazelton. This is outrages, an abuse of power and due process as it shows wikipeidia unfit to to have any bios on it and I would encourage any with a wiki bio to investigate their legal options and force wikipieida to removed their biography from this website." +Could I still expect any answer????? +" Subgenres? All the listed ""subgenres"" are defined (on their own pages) as subgenres of heavy metal, if so, this is equating metal music to heavy metal music, perhaps a merge would suit then? (|☎) " +I think they are more important things you can do to advance wikipedia as spent your whole time to discuss whether a country in one of 53 ESC's finnished joint last or second-last especially the rankings in this case seem to be disposal of the EBU (but we had to accept this!). It's just a pitty to see how vandals, pov-pushers and trolls (like onceloose how you could see in his comments) are able to vandalise articles though undoubtable sources were given and will be supported bei administrators. +) 13:01, 19 August 2015 +Weather in 2007 Hello Oghmoir,thanks for contacting me. I think you have done a great job of the Weather in 2007 page, very, very interesting. Any deletions on the page by me were accidental, sorry for this. I am glad you liked my article, although it is not always easy to write about the weather. But I guess you already know that. I have years of study behind my back but there are things I don't fully understand. Writing those aricles needs lots of research. I try to be as accurate as possible. I think progress will be slow but this kind of pages are becoming increasingly popular as more and more people want to read more about whats happening to our planet. +" I removed the wikification around St. Maol Ruadh in the history section as it was a red link. The sentence includes: ""when St Maelrubha preached ... by St Maol Ruadh in"", which appears to be two versions of the same name. Maol Rubha is a redirect to the Wiki article Maol Rubha which starts: ""Máel Ruba (pronounced /mail Ruva/), ... Maol Rubha (MoRubha/MaRuibhe) (Scottish Gaelic spelling)"" and is about the saint not the battle. Can someone confirm they are one and the same man, and make an appropriate judgement please? I'm aware of local sensibilities and as a Sassenach don't wish to tread on toes! Meanwhile I've redone the wikification on St. Maol Ruadh to go straight to Maol Rubha. " +" ""I may well do, but it will be on the condition that you stop your disruptive edits immediately"" he was trying to be a big headed administrator i asked him a question all he had to say was yes or no not get rude for no reason.. you know what this schmuck should be blocked. i showed what i send to some (romudamul +November 2012 Hi! I saw your edits to Archer High School. Please don't do that. Thank you +{{Infobox football biography | name = ==Emmanuel Adewole== | full name = Emmanuel Wonder Adewole | birth date = | birth place = Ota, Nigeria | height = | position = Forward Central Midfielder | current club = Free Agent | club number = | youth years1 = | youth clubs1 = Arsenal | youth clubs2 = University of Rio Grande | youth clubs3 = Drake University | youth clubs4 = | years1 = 2009-2010 | years2 = 2010-2011 | years3 = 2012 | years4 = 2012-2013 | years4 = 2013 | clubs1 = Springfield Demize | clubs2 = Des Moines Mencae | clubs3 = Bodens BK | clubs4 = Hammerfest FK | clubs5 = ACS Berceni | caps1 = 13 | caps2 = (-) | caps3 = (-) | caps4 = 15 | goals1 = 5 | goals2 = (-) | goals3 = (-) | goals4 = 12 | goals4 = (-) +Fred M. Levin I created this page on a psychotherapist, Fred M. Levin. I think he is noteworthy in the field. It is up for deletion. Anyone care to opine? If this is an inappropraite forum for this, just delete it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fred_M._Levin_(2nd_nomination) mwalla +" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Here are some other hints and tips: I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.) When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. ▪◦▪Talk " +These games are so childish +He past 3RR on another page, so I reported him there as well. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. +I just figured out how to go back years in the article history. The bench press record has been in the article pretty much since the beginning. Here it is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bench_press&direction;=next&oldid;=5794667 Taking out the record would be a shame. The reason there is a difference in the Guinness record and lifts sanctioned by less notable organizations is that there are different rules on what technique constitutes a lift, if equipment is allowed to aid the lifter, and if performance enhancing drugs are tested for. If you take away all rules and judging, then anyone can claim the record. Aaron's home run record does not include the home runs he hit in the negro leagues. Josh Gibson is not the HR record holder. You can't just go out to your local gym, alert the media and complete the lift. It has to be judged by an existing set of regulations. What is a lift? Is there a pause on the chest? Can the athlete use legs to push? Can they be on drugs? Who tests? How often? Who weighs the official plates that were used? Does it have to be a standard bench? Are you allowed to put bungee cords under your lifting shirt? When is the lift complete? Lucky for us there is already an organization, recognized by the world, that takes care of all there rules and regulations. The argument is simple. If you want to be considered the greatest quarterback of all time, you compete in the NFL, the highest governing body of that sport. Powerlifting and other sports like it have International Federations and that fact should be recognized here. +Well now, I might not mind doing the Andrew Lang page - that one is a mess too. The Grimm Brothers looks like a big mess because there are separate pages for the two brothers and then the single page for the brothers - which seems like a lot of tidying and I'm not sure I'm up for such a big task. Perrault interests me vaguely, but I could be persuaded to do a smaller page on someone like Lang. Do you mind having a look at the different pages and letting me know what you think? +- Usain Bolt 200 metres +forecast why the page doesnt have a link to the forecast for the year 2006 or 2007, as most of the pages of this kind do. +Articles deleted by Wales Do you have a list of these somewhere? *watching* +" (Westfall 1980, p. 266) ""In effect, Leibniz had arrived where Newton had been ten years earlier. He had just invented the calculus.""" +" The argument from majority Fine, this is Wikipedia and not primary literature, so the argument from majority is not automatically considered a logical fallacy. OK. But how many people have rejected the DC hypothesis for reasons other than ""bah, yet another long-range proposal""? (Again, the fact that the Proto-Caucasian and Proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstructions used are difficult to test is in the article – you're welcome to move it to a more prominent position.) Sure, Trask has, mainly because his reconstruction of Pre-Basque is different. (I will mention this more prominently in the article.) But besides? Here is a post by Stefan Georg on when a hypothesis on language relationships should be considered accepted. For the record, Georg is currently most famous for fighting against the Altaic hypothesis (though he accepts a Tungusic-Korean-Japonic grouping as likely), rejects Nostratic, rejects DC, but accepts Seefloth's Uralo-Siberian because it's based on morphology. Here is a follow-up by Trask, here one by Vovin, and here another one by Georg. To be an Indo-Europeanist, you have to know a lot about each of the branches of IE. How many people, other than the late Starostin, have anything near that kind of knowledge about East Caucasian and West Caucasian and Yeniseian and Sino-Tibetan and so on? Bengtson seems to be working on it, but he almost completely limits himself to Basque, the two Caucasians, and Burushaski (which he finds to be closely related), but he almost never mentions Sino-Tibetan or Na-Dené. That makes about one half of a person that is capable of judging the DC hypothesis (as a whole) beyond finding mistakes in the data from one of the supposed members. For that matter, Starostin himself largely ignored Na-Dené, Basque, and Burushaski. Is there (already) a paper that takes the proposed evidence apart? If so, I'll be glad to cite it. (For the record, here is a discussion of a paper that shows, IMHO quite clearly, that what little evidence there was for including Omotic in Afro-Asiatic was wrong. A link to that paper is included.) Here, incidentally, is an introduction to Burushaski – secondary literature – which makes favorable comparisons to Yeniseian and Sino-Tibetan. In sum, I don't see anything wrong with presenting the hypothesis (in its latest incarnation) on Wikipedia. It is a controversial discussion subject, so (comparatively) many people will find it interesting. In the meantime, I'll add some morphological evidence (suppletive pronoun paradigms, noun class prefixes) to the Macro-Caucasian section of the article, provided that Bengtson tells me that this paper is actually published. I'll also try to make more mention of the hypotheses that combine Sino-Tibetan with geographically adjacent families and thus contradict DC. " +, 26 October 2005 (UTC) Agreed. Since this will be initial versions,take the best 'risk with generally accepted statements. 06:53 +Is that normal on en to get blocked, because you name a liar as a liar? And why the liar doesn't try to explain his actions or ask for forgiveness? btw: That all happened on Jimbo's talksite, so he should give a very good explanation. 92.230.85.188 +head voice very smoothly +Out of the closet And here was me thinking you were a plumber from Edinburgh! ;) +The Great WIKI BALL OF WAX Eigth wonder of the world people would travel for many a night in order to complete the great pilgrimage to the holy land of the GREAT WIKI BALL OF WAX category:history category:landmarks +cheers Die in a fire +" Yeah, the men's team is definitely better than our girls team. Although I root for all the teams at ESU, I mostly follow the football, basketball and baseball/softball teams. I don't keep much up to date with the other sports. Do you plan on expanding the JMU article? ''' | Chat?''' " +From what I can tell as DiC's licence has expired I don't think its dub is supposed to be played anymore. So in effect it's banner but that's not quite the right terminology use. At leas that is what I've been lead to believe. +" You have not engaged in consensus building, you have been disruptive. The consensus is already there on things like WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:OR (which your statements about polarization have obviously violated). After I removed them, you continued to revert my changes, eventhough you were in the wrong. Whether you're aware of it or not, it doesn't matter. I remove garbage content when I see it, in accordance with policy, because I care about Wikipedia and its reputation. All you need to do is look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Critical reception to know that ""The use of print reviews is encouraged. Commentary should also be sought from reliable sources for critics' general consensus of the film. These will be more reliable in retrospect; closer to the release, review aggregate websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic should be cited for statistics pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews."" So there's your answer." +" '''| style=""font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: black;"" | This section of users contributes using Internet Explorer''' " +I see your point and agree. This should be changed. 207.237.230.18 +"== Board of Trustees elections == Hi. I'm , editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. We're doing candidate profiles for the Board elections. We publish in a matter of hours, so I hope you can answer them before press time. The questions we'd like you to answer are below. Talk to if you have any questions; he'll be covering the elections this year. Thanks, Hello! The Wikipedia Signpost, a community-newspaper in the English Wikipedia, is covering the Board of Trustees elections and will be featuring each of the candidates in next week's issue. As such, we would appreciate it if you would take some time to answer a few interview questions. Each candidate will be asked the same questions; by no means, though, feel obligated to answer any (or even) all of them, though we would greatly appreciate it if you did. Some of the questions may be a bit redundant to the candidate information you have filled out already. This is both for convenience and for giving you the opportunity to expand on some of them a bit. However, we ask that you keep all responses brief, limiting them to no more than one or two paragraphs each. You may leave replies to my English Wikipedia talk page, or on my meta talk page. As always, the Signpost reserves the right to re-distribute the questions and replies, shorten any responses if necessary, and take any other editorial action deemed appropriate. Thanks again for your time, and please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions! ~~~~ Your name: Aaron Swartz Your username most commonly used: AaronSw Your current geographic location, along with your age:Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 19 Projects with significant contributions (please both name the language and project, and link to your contributions): en.wikipedia, en.wikisource, en.wikiquote, en.wikinews, meta.wikimedia, wikimania2006 Do you have any rights (i.e. admin, bureaucrat) or positions (i.e. dispute resolution, CheckUser, etc.) on any of those projects? If so, which ones? When did you get elected or promoted for each one? no Do you hold any universal rights (i.e. steward, etc.) for Wikimedia Projects? If so, since when? no When did you first start contributing to Wikimedia projects? Why and how did you initially join?I started midway through 2003 when I begun studying Internet and constitutional law and wanted to write down all the things I was learning for others. Briefly describe your career (""real-life""). How do you think this will help you be a successful Board member?I'm currently a co-founder of Reddit. Of all the candidates right now, why do you stand out from the field? What makes you the best candidate? A knowledge of several languages has been cited as a key requirement for a Board member. Do you speak any other languages other than English? Why do you think language is or isn't critical to the Board? What do you expect to do while serving on the Board? What are your expectations? What can you bring to the Board? What can you contribute to the Wikimedia Foundation? Describe the one issue that you think is most pressing and pertinent to the Foundation right now, and how you would approach the situation. What is your vision of the Board in the Foundation heirarchy? How do you feel about the current leadership? As a Board member, you will be serving as a representative of the communities. Do you think you can represent the community and understand its concerns? Why? What do you think of the Wikimedia Foundation and its mission in general? If you could change one thing about the running of the Foundation, what would you change? If elected, can and will you devote the appropriate time and other resources needed to serve on the Board? Have you ever attended Wikimania or any other meetup? What role do you think these meetups play? Please list (and link) any other pages where you have gotten questions and comments pertaining to the Board elections; we are compiling all of the questions and would appreciate this. What would you say to a potential voter who is undecided right now? Is there anything else you would like to mention?NE +FUCK YOU UNFAIR ASSHOLE YOU DONT EVEN CARE FOR FAIRNESS JUST BEING A FUCKING DRONE ASSHOLE \ +Oops! I notice that my edit summary mentioning BRD was on the Alternative medicine article. My bad. Well, it still applies, even if it isn't mentioned. You have been here long enough to know that. +Blutengel produce simply Techno music. There is no Dark Wave sound. +Block reset again — see User talk:89.138.33.233 and User talk:217.132.31.104. +October 2010 (UTC) Of course he's correct. But the real failing of wikipedia is one (or a few) correct people is no match for one determined prat.129.133.127.244 01:53, 9 +Understood Just make sure no one else makes subsequent comments on the same nomination page to which you're not asking me to provide my replies. Otherwise, if people will continue to write underneath my previous statements of opposition, to make my comments just as readily available, I should be able to have such comments of mine posted rigth below theirs without having to resort to post on another page that would make my comments obscure. +" It is a ""Biblical scientific foreknowledge"" thread. The goalpost are not being moved. " +The phrase is also used in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, where it is equated with the Man of Sin. +vandalism Your Abuse Response Filing Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from prashantsingh1142. +Since you asked? I'd suck it up, understand that Wikipedia is attempting to be encyclopedic and that statements here should be backed up by reliable sources, and find one. You claim you're essentially an expert on Britich comics...what's to stop me from making the same claim about physics? We can't simply take an editor's word for it that they're qualified to speak about a particular subject. This is discussed at length at WP:V. Making the effort to find a reliable source seems, to me, a more productive use of your time than dwelling on the fact that your information was removed for lacking one, especially when it's not an attack on you or a matter of questioning your credibility. +Stop spamming or I will block you for the next three decades. +"== Talkback == ''''''2010 " +UPDATE: Hello. I sent in an e-mail and this request is unfortunately not doable under the oversight policy. You may leave a note in the block log using a 0-second block. Thank you. 69.155.128.40 +I placed it at Capital (architecture), with the information it needed. Excellent! excellent! 22:48, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) +Arbitration Committee ruling The case against you has closed. It is the decision of the Arbitration Committee that you are to be banned for sixty days ending 17 March 2005. You are also prohibited for a period of one year from editing any article which relates to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict except in the following manner: each edit shall involve insertion or removal of one discrete piece of information which shall be referenced either by comment or footnote to a specific page in a book published in English and readily available in libraries or by purchase. References to URLs are acceptable only if the site is in English and the information referenced is readily located by consulting the webpage. You shall be placed on personal attack parole for three months; if you make an edit which an administrator judges to be a personal attack you may be banned for up to three days. All information added by you to Israeli-Palestinian conflict articles must be adequately referenced, and you may not remove adequately referenced information from Israeli-Palestinian conflict articles, and you also may not revert edits which are purely organisational. For further details, please consult the Committee's final decision. t 01:47, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC) +Unfortunately, due to my history, I don't think many admins watch my talk page. And I could see someone may have caused some more slightly contentious edits. But I think my history speaks for itself. If I really wanted to get unblocked solely to harass Factocop, or was of Trollish mindset, I would have just edited unregistered. I respect my account, and believe some other editors respect the edits I make. I.e Irish & Northern Irish infrastructure, Air Transport, and Derry articles. Anyway, how would I go about attracting attention to other admins for an independent review? +I.P. address/range blocked? +Shit face fuck LEAVE ME DF ALONE +*sigh* I want to bang heads together. Note especially the Edit Summaries. So I've stepped it up a little. —  Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) +but also read shoa too since your curious about the amhara thing. +Thank you for experimenting with the page ‎Nate valler on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article ‎Nate valler may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. +there goes the plantation driver shakespeare again, picking at this artist this is a very talented young lady and she deserves her article on here stop hating shakespeare +"::::::::::::Brumby, clumper and Barcoo are (I think unique to AUS). Mobs also run in NZ as FIK. It would be helpful to have more Kiwi input, though. I would hope that ""UK English"" and ""US English"" should cover most listings. India did have many early ""UK English"", words, too. " +You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You are a stinky face. 222.127.85.44 +" First project for Wikipedia As of April 2, 2008, edited this page as first project. Any comments appreciated. Did the following: From previous posts, learned that page direction was for terminology, not necessarily biology. But added more succinct genetic information citation to definition, making the body of the text heavier. Added short biology section because of this. Found more usage of the term ""black sheep."" Depending on the group culture using the phrase, it was either positive or negative, so further clarified usage by splitting the term into two groupings with citations and examples for each. I know Baa Baa Black Sheep was removed once. However, it is an example of the use of the term. The other examples should be obvious. If not how do I clarify. Did not find a standard template for citation on this page. Would anyone let me know what the standard for this page is and how it was chosen, and I will go back and change. Thanks. " +is remove by bot now! ridiculous. please to fix mistake most quickly. +Never saw that on the RfC. Might want to read it again. +Gross misinformation Look: I don't care where you took this chart from, remember well: Bulgarian has six vowels, SIX, SIX, SIX and NOT eight. There are four other allophones (two between a and @ and two between o and u), which appear in unstressed syllables depending on the position of the unstressed syllable to the stressed syllable within a certain word. If you are posting also allophones and not only phonemes (the reasonable question is why you are doing this but we'll deal with this some other time), then the vowel chart should include all ten of them and not only eight with information which is an allophone and which is a phoneme. But you don't know that, do you? Then we get to another reasonable question: why do you think that you can erase the whole vowel section with the vowel descriptions? Ha? So: you post a chart which is WRONG and then you erase a section which is RIGHT. What the hell are you doing? I am getting tired of non-experts who read something somewhere and then come and try to wreak havoc on articles which they understand nothing about. A couple of months ago, one user was trying to change the article Bulgaria because he had read that the Bulgarians were descendants of the Shumers. In two words, your edit is pretty much of the same value and worth. For the phonetics section here, I've used the Routledge compendium on Slavic languages (1991) and the newest Bulgarian edition of New Bulgarian - phonetics, grammar and syntax. Please, consult any book on Bulgarian phonetics before you come again with this vowel chart. +I actually wrote most of that Trivia note (and it has since been reworked on TFWiki.net), for I was the fan who inadvertently alerted Michael Bay to the two interviews. However, your conclusion that IDW Publishing's information confirming the Fallen was false is the opposite of what I intended, as I was actually suggesting that IDW Publishing were silenced by Paramount Pictures for divulging information that they were not supposed to have released at that point in time. - FFN +Oppose. The city is extremely important information for the title of transport utilities, if the context of the city is not already established, as it is not for an article title. +" I find the remarks here of great interest, and indeed raise both issues I have considered at length and those which I have never considered before. a) Discrimination:: clear this list maybe hetergenous, but is clearly not indiscriminate. On the contrary, groups of Masons have discussed together and made certain decisions about their relations of amity with one another This is clear discriminate behaviour. As regards notability, clear the discussion about whether UGLE recognised the Rite of Memphis-Misraim in the 1850's clearly involved political decisions taking place in consequence of the Revolutions of 1848. Involving such key figures at Louis Blanc and Guiseppe Garibaldi, this is clearly highly notable people and events. And there has yet to be any serious discussion of the role of revolutionary freemasonry in the International Workingmen's Association, which will also of couse link us into the very contraversial figure of Mihail Bakunin. Onfortunately these issues are all far too notable. b) verifiability Well, this also relates to falsifiability and what is considered to be the truth. I have found the writings of Charles Peirce very helpful in this respect. c) Likewise raises the issue of original research. This means that Wikipedia is immedtiately functioning at the level of intertextuality - i.e. the information contained on a wikipedia pagelinks other pieces of text, from which peopel may infer facts or events existing outside language. I would further argue that teh distinction between original research are the difference between relying on publisjed sources and unpublished ones, institutional denioted by the separate organisation of archives and libraries. I agree with [User:ALR|ALR]] that the task is a bit daunting, however if we can entice the anarcho-capitalists who produced such wonders on teh anacrhism talk pages a while ago I am sure we can create a suitable masters carpet of information from which Mason and Cowan can freely, fairly and friendly learn from and inform their fellow sentient creatures who have access to the internet. " +Conan Dating http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zlSkwhus_M +???? im going to bed. peace out beaches. +Mr. Break Grant Talk Page +He's a Jew; someone put in the appropriate category please. +"259694712&oldid;=259689030]. And what I added doesn't fit a ""symbolism"" section. Above, I was complaining about removal of mostly symbolic parts; well, actually, what I missed was first the mention of those fact, and only afterwards possible interpretations. Looking at the guideline and its provided example, I do think that the significance of the facts should be described in-between the plot. I'm not sure if that's what the manual of style actually says. You at the very least need to cite the ""possible reference"" part. gial For instance, I do not appreciate most of the edits of this combined diff, from the same author of the one I discuss above: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garden_State_(film)&diff;=" +Sounds like THF is lazy - Schwitzer is more notable in this debate than Bozell. He worked in television medical news for 14 years, with positions at CNN in Atlanta, WFAA-TV in Dallas, and WTMJ-TV in Milwaukee. He was head of the medical news unit at CNN, leading the efforts of ten staff members in Atlanta and Washington, D.C. After leaving the television news business, he has frequently been asked to write or speak on the state of medical journalism. He now runs one of the premiere health blogs. What's Bozell know about journalism and medicine, and medical journalism, outside of his partisan diatribes? Not much. +Quran proves Jesus was not crucified Hey there, thank you for your help in moving this along. As we both agree that the Quran is the word of God I understand you want to help get rid of some of the racist bias on wikipedia. Thanks for your help!! 19 May, 2015 +The citations were provided. Clear your cache. +I will give you a clear answer. I have just to watch what the wikipedia admins are doing. I am looking specially to the justice of wikipedia and after this, if you are here, you will get your answer. You have showed by this to everyone, how knogledgeless, hopeless, jealous, shameless and stupid you are! (Tofaan-توفان) +" I'm a little unsure if the Stereo Remixes section should read as it does. Although it was quite nice of him to do the mixes, Dominick Giammarino is not a notable figure in Beatles history. I think a little vote is in order. We all have toyed with Beatles songs over the years. * Sixstring1965The Beatles Wikiproject August 24, 2007 21:59" +gonna get you... ...you giant twat faced prick!!! 86.179.113.103 +" Sockpuppets So what? that was a long time ago. Dont ""screw around"" with my userpage and I wont with yours. Randazzo56. " +OK, who is going to find and add the sources? And who is going to remove the unsourced, and when? +" Please stop recreating the article ""Chucky goes nuts"" A comment in an interview on MTV does not warrant the creation of a number of article that you created, especially when it is an idea the director and, and in no way has even been approved by a studio. " +" Vandal Hi there NUKE, VASCO here, There is this ""user"" (see ""contributions"" here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Portugal08x). Regarding is edits on individual players, he will do solely this: inflate stats in their infoboxes. That constitutes vandalism, methinks. Of course, you are ""the master"" but if it was me, he would have to be start thinking of a new account...All the best to you, keep it up - " +Ungracious? What of it, I'm not the Queen. We are here to write an encyclopedia not an etiquette book, a self promoting peerage, or even a manual for soothing hurt feelings. Perhaps some people here need to be reminded of that. +Stop! Regarding your rant about the Founders section in this edit... Stop! No on ever asked for the lengthy list, and all editors involved alredy knew about the list at the other Talk page. I did not remove any information, I appropriately replaced it with a link to the original section, which is fully intact. Though restoring the lengthy list was entirely unnecessary, I don't have any major complaint to having it in a hidden section. The restoration of the section in the hidden template makes your subsequent attack entirely irrelevant. You will be reported if you continue this behaviour of commenting unnecessarily on other editors, as you have also continued doing with BlackCab. +"! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |} {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists |- ! Writing articles |- |s +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rutlish School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Fixed reference in the article. += Voice Actors Wiki Re: Giusy Di Martino and similar: It's a slum, compared with WP, but if all else fails, Voice Actors Wiki] on Wikia is at least a caring home for VA articles. +":::: Never mind ""pipe"". It's the term ""blueprint"" that gets my hackles up!81.178.153.156 " +" Wikipedia depends on WP:V. If a reliable source mention there is a NMD in Japan, we have to add it. The quote from the book is ""In Japan, there is a national masturbation day. Many websites boast about May being International Masturbation Month in which, among other activities, people are encouraged to get involved in masturbate-a-thons, various forms of self-loving, and mutual sexual play."" This reference is checked by Talk " +". You seem to be a repeat party to these ""which version is used"" disputes, if Bravely Default's talk page is anything to go by" +" reinserting the term ""Boldly is appropriate, see definition. For a woman over 60 to make a youtube video taking on the State of California is indeed bold. bold |bōld| adjective 1 (of a person, action, or idea) showing an ability to take risks; confident and courageous a bold attempt to solve the crisis " +More Dominicans than mexicans Dominicans number at 20,000 in the state.. with about 80% of that being in the city of Philadelphia.. 80% = about 17,000.. compare 17,000 Dominicans to about 12,000 mexicans.. Dominicans are obviously the larger group by acouple thousand.. some sources: http://articles.philly.com and /1996-02-07/news/25658327_1_dominican-republic-dominican-population-dominican-people http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/MPI_Report_Dominican_Pop_US.pdf +, 29 November 2012 (UTC) I don't see any down paragraphs except the differentiates between the date 6 February and February 6th. 21:43 +Copyright violations +(A white fatass that ain't sh!t and acting like a bihcpadding +I can stick my huge penis in 's ass +" I will delete the second portion of my grudge against this administrator. The first paragraph outlining my complaints will remain, I still feel I was treated unfairly in this case and need a forum for expressing my side of the story as I have been applied with the labels of ""wackjob"" and ""tinfoil hat"" wearer for a perfectly repsectable theory. " +" I actually was merely copying the block reason specified by earlier. You'll likely want to go to him with this question - I have very little information on this case other than ""the vandalism recurred"" and ""the collateral damage on the block was minimal"". (Questions or Comments?) " +Realy id Tech 1? Hello. According to some other source, id Tech 1 is the Quake engine. On the id Software webpage, id Tech 2 only identify Quake 2 and they dont talk about the 1. So, are you sure about that? If any body can contact id to know the official reference, it can be very helpful. bayo +Thanks, Michael 08:57, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) +Proto languages== This is the most probable development: Proto-Uralic: 4000 BC Proto-Finno-Ugric: 3000 BC Proto-Finno-Permic: 2000 BC Proto-Finno-Volgaic: 1500 BC Proto-Finno-Lappic & Proto-Ugric: 1000 BC 22:09, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) == +" Glide to the finish If he relied on team mates, I would of had to say ""He aint SHIT without his homies!"" 70.121.33.78 " +" Keep I've added several reviews for him, enough to establish real-world notability. I also added a request for creation info in the article's todo since I have no access to those, but I know they exist. 007 Keep if more reviews could be added. Keep Looks like there is now enough to say the article can be kept.ない " +Hello, around 50 % resettled in the territory of former Mandatory Palestine and around 50 % outside (Lebanon, Syria, Egypt and Jordan). +" HAPPI colour Hello, I've just started trying and it looks very promising. One question though, why are the colours mapped white for new to red for old? Would it not be better to have the new text coloured red? That way an editor can easily spot new changes (red) in a sea of more stable text (white or pale pink). " +As is stated in the article, Proclamation Day is celebrated on December 26 although December 28 was the actual date the Province of South Australia was proclaimed. It's not unsual to have public holidays commemorating certain events on days different to their actual dates in Australia, usually to ensure long weekends or keep successive holidays in blocks. December 28 is probably still remembered, but the public holiday and festivities occur on what is elsewhere Boxing Day. | talk +" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar Thank you for participating in the January 2012 MTC Drive. The drive was a big success. As a result of the drive thousands of files was transferred and many files was nominated for deletion because of copyright issues or because they were not usable. For your big work transferring files to Commons you are hereby awarded this barnstar. " +By the way, if anybody needs any evidence of Servs belonging to the Serving cast of the Slavic tribes: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13732a.htm +" Orphaned fair use image (:Image:74fsa.gif) This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:74fsa.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " +Mouse versus fruitfly There is some interesting stuff about the comparison between doing this prize with a mouse and doing it with fruitflies (drosophila). A couple of the more interesting points are that in a lab you can cheaply maintain and process larger numbers of fruitflies than mice, and the fruitfly lifespan is much shorter than the mouse lifespan so you get quicker feedback. But I also understand the publicity argument that people feel more kinship with mice. It's easier as a non-scientist to believe that results in mice are much more relevant to humans. Results in mice will more easily attract funding for subsequent work. Does it make sense for researchers to work with fruitflies first, and then port their techniques to mice for later confirmation and to collect the prize? Hopefully that would take relatively little more time and expense than doing the whole thing with fruitflies. We'd eventually need to port these techniques from mice to humans anyway, so there is a presumption that porting across species is feasible. +Of course they've done nothing. The belief that Jimbo might actually do something about any hobbyhorse issue being promoted on his talk page, rather than platitudinising etc, is a triumph of hope over experience. This all began as a Gardner initiative: she has now gone, leaving the community to pick up the pieces from her failed systemic bias initiatives. The damage her ideas did in relation to the Indic topic area, where she also sought more inclusiveness but didn't think it through, is another case in point. - +" Snapple Real Facts Are all of these facts actually confirmed to be true? I know I've gotten one multiple times stating ""A duck's quack does not echo"", and I've also seen one stating ""A goldfish's attention span is three seconds."" These are not actually true (at least if you believe MythBusters). I'm not sure if there's actually that much concern over the veracity of the stuff they print on Snapple caps, so it may not be pertinent to the article, but I thought I'd throw this idea out here to see what people think. " +I'm not the deranged harrasser here. You and yours are. Project your personality onto someone else. +Although not officially released, they deserve an article (at least Van Gogh), has happens with 50 cent's Power of the Dollar. +A ewe is a female sheep. Since the word is pronounced 'you', there is some confusion surrounding this word. Strictly from spelling 'an ewe' seems more appropriate, but from a pronunciation point of view, 'a ewe' is superior. While I'm not sure which version is more gramatically correct, a google search suggests that 'a ewe' is more common (oddly, some websites use both methods of spelling), so I'm inclined to keep it at 'a ewe'. +if you do not stop, the wikapidea nijas will come to your house and kill you +I didn't initiate the attacks, just responded to them in turn. Calling them nuts was euphemistic. I could have called them turkeys as well. Obviously, Wikipedia is the encyclopedia only people with proprietary interest in an article can edit. You're part of the problem. Underwood had an effect on the church, or at bare minimum is an 'in-joke' therefore there should be mention of him in the article. I can see your mind is made up though, so I'll save my breath, there's no point having integrity when surrounded by folks determined to enforce their bias and other folks too busy to research the subject properly (it took you several minutes to research hundreds of posts and relationships between church members and Underwood). I'm done. Your arrogance is plain as day. I didn't claim to have made a perfect edit, I even suggested re-editing in the talk page. However Underwood's effect is plain as day, and as such should be mentioned. The reason I'm leery of the 'custodians' of the page is because in adding the Bob Black bombing I encountered the same kind of opposition. I'm not opposed to the Church, I just think that articles deserve more than custodial opinions by caretaker editors who have a vested interest in the outcome of the article. You were just in too big a hurry. I have a fair amount of experience editing, and know that a mention shouldn't require a full-on assault to accomplish when there is proof of association. I'm not trying to make the Church look guilty, just trying to keep accuracy on a topic that (if you research the Underwood article) often has been edited less than veraciously and is a continuously recurring discussion topic in alt.slack even 5 years after the murders. As I indicated in some of my edit summaries, rumor control, not hostile edit, just hostile to those determined to obscure data to save Church face. 71.102.18.173 +Mentone Grammar School Redux Definitely a bit rich on my part... That was an awesome post though... i actually didn't think you were a real person... just like an automated computer response or something. Sorry about the name calling. Will lift my game now that i know you're real. Cheers! P.S. Do you look after wikipedia 24 hours a day? Is it like a job and you get paid for it? +(Answered on ThinkBlue's talk page.) +Untrue. I *respected* my time-out and did NO editing. I am curious as to what edits you refer, because after my unfair smack-down, I walked away for a week. Point of fact. +Oops! Sorry, I didn't realize that. +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Leonardo da Vinci, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Ron, there are limits to democracy, which seem to be recognized by Wikipedia: they want consensus. CapJ - Maybe you should start a page on Osu, then I will add the kanji transliterations. ron Southwick In fact, how about a page which actually transliterates martial arts terms, i.e. kung fu, osu, shodan…etc. So many are misused and you know how I love kanji/hanja. ron Southwick If you can stop deleting my work, we'll see... +Boas’s Changes in Bodily Form: The Immigrant Study, Cranial Plasticity, and Boas’s Physical Anthropology. AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST 105(2):326–332 The sleazy language says it all - the only thing boas intended was to show that genetics did not play 100% role ... Sure. And jews didn't make up to 50% in the highest Cheka ranks in 1918 - they were poor victims of Russian antisemitism... Stuck your advice into your throat. +BTW: 90% of the Chinese people in Vietnam were from Guangzhou/Guangxi, and we've never really seen them as Chinese anyway. We've always seen them to be part of the fringe ambiguous people who might be Chinese or something else. Chinese in Vietnam pretend to be from Shanghai or Beijing so they can suck money off you wannabes. So you're actually a lot further from us than you really think. If you can speak Chinese, talk to some native Chinese people and you'll see I'm right. I would know because I AM native Chinese. +Hey you Your filthy Wiki page. +I know but I just want an article for EVERYTHING. I hope you understand. +uR gAY U LIKE DICK u FUCKING FAGGOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +And don't delete things from mytalk, asshole +" ""The encyclopedia that anyone can edit"" makes for a good slogan, but a lousy encyclopedia."" - WOW. Thankfully, it's not for you to decide. ""Unsourced content is a scourge to editors."" - EDITORS are a scourge for content that happily was there for 5-6 years and didn't offend no one but EDITORS. ""Anyone who claims not to be a Wikipedia editor, and does not want to learn our policies and practices, should be left out in the cold"" - wow again. THIS IS SO AGAINST OFFICIAL POLICIES. I will report you also. Since cowardly you and cowardly Wolfowitz decided not to ANSWER MY DIRECT QUESTION WHERE I CAN COMPLAIN, THUS REFUSING ME A LINE OF COMMUNICATION WITH AUTHORITIES, I will find it myself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents right? 95.28.219.174 " +Glad I could help. I've been keeping an eye on as much of the Medal of Honor stuff as I can. +Reply: William Frankena was my father. The photo is one of a pair of family album photos of my father and my mother. It never belonged to a university or other employer. +You're an ugly man aren't you? Were I bullied hence such a crappy job. Probably. Given the way u look now I wouldn't expect love soonest. Regards Hancock +Do you need a verifiable source for that statement? Check your own user page you fat, miserable balding fuck. +Based upon the cited text, would it not be more accurate to state that Mr. Corcoran was considered for the Gérard Boulvert prize, but that this was awarded to Giuseppe Falcone (who I suppose lacks the proper connections to merit his own promotional WP biography?)67.168.135.107 +It appears to be a form of spam advertising for the site http://www.bandhayoga.com. +Please pay some attention Can you respond to my post above please? +Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Regards, +" Interaction Ban... not working I'm not waiting 8 hours, sorry. I don't know if that even applies to everyone or just to the editors under the ban, but I don't really care to be honest... this is out of hand. It's absolutely ridiculous what I-P is turning into on Wikipedia and it is largely a result of this interaction ban which is broken on a nearly daily basis. It is pitting the two ""sides"" against each other and it has gotten worse than I have ever seen it. The interaction ban is not working; therefore, I hope that you will do something else that can help this situation before it completely falls apart. Here are the newest violations of the interaction ban: I know you are already aware of the post that was made at AN/I. It had a direct mention of Mbz1 by Factomancer through diffs. It was not a complaint about an interaction ban violation on Mbz1's part, so there was no reason for Factomancer to be mentioning Mbz1. You responded at that AN/I and didn't do anything about it, so I guess you didn't consider it a violation for some reason. Maybe because she attempted to strike out and delete the request after the fact? Although personally that makes it worse in my eyes, but clearly I'm not the admin. Anyway, past AN/I, she put the same violation on her user page here . It is also a clear violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC. Soon after, she also removed this information, replacing the content with this stating that she is going on a long break. She has done this before when she has gotten herself into big trouble, only to change her mind after a couple of days and come back. As we can see, her temporary break in that case didn't change her behaviour, as here we are once again. I'm truly tired of dealing with this crap. Last year we actually had some sort of collaboration going on in I-P on Wikipedia, before we had to deal with issues like this (to this severity, at least). A combination of a few ""new"" users coming into the I-P struggle relatively recently have turned it into a real warzone between the two sides, and I don't like it. I don't think other people like it either. It is having an EXTREMELY detrimental effect on the encyclopedia in the I-P area, because not only is so much of our time wasted fighting and defending each other in constant AE and AN/I reports, or sitting out short bans for minor infractions, but even aside from that, it just isn't rewarding or feasible to try to contribute and collaborate anymore. There is no longer an expectation that posting something constructive on a talk page will lead to discussion from people who disagree. There is no point of making significant edits to articles because they are simply followed up by quick reverts, often with no edit summary. I was planning on coming up with some conclusion to this complaint to convince you to take action, but you know what, typically as of late I've even lost my motivation to do that. I just don't care; it's a waste of time and probably won't get the atmosphere between editors back to what it used to be anyway. The problem is that all you can do (or are willing to do anyway) is impose bans based strictly upon the word of the rules interpreted specifically based on the individual situation. If you took a minute to look at the big picture and understand the impact that certain users are having on the entire I-P editing community with their constant infractions and battles, maybe you would think of a different solution. " +" Sockpuppetry I strongly suspect that is either your sockpuppet or meatpuppet. The user popped up for the first time in years to comment in a deletion discussion (after having only made one previous edit) , and the reasoning and format of their post was extremely similar to yours. 0422 " +Oh. Do you yourself show any respect for WP policies? You are continually saying uncivil things to others. And mocking at users who had been blocked is also uncivil. How is that not a policy violation? Just because you and your sidekicks get overlooked by admins does not mean you are better than anyone else.- +" No offense, but can you honestly count this one? The user self-nommed first. Personally I don't think it counts / " +Thanks for you attention to this trouble. Users can attack content proposals vigorously and I'll have no problem with it; when they repeatedly attack personal motivations or attitudes, it's unacceptable in my view. (talk) +I had my brain in neutral when asking that question! +" It is a popular misconception that the sun is at its greatest elevation above the horizon at noon every day. This misconception is reflected in the ""Measurement"" section: ""...the difference of the heights of the Sun above the horizon at noon on the longest and shortest day of the year is twice the obliquity."" Because of the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit around the Sun, the angular velocity of the Earth's orbital motion is not constant. The axial tilt of the Earth also causes a periodic variation in the time that the Sun reaches the meridian. As a result, the Sun may cross the meridian (and reach its maximum height above the horizon) as early as 16 min 33 s before noon (around November 3) or as late as 14 min 6 sec after noon (around February 12). This is explained in detail on the “Equation of time” page. Of course there is always a tradeoff between maximum scientific accuracy on the one hand and the goal of keeping articles simple and straightforward for non-technical readers on the other hand. One possibility: “...the difference of the maximum heights of the Sun above the horizon at midday on the longest and shortest day of the year is twice the obliquity.” The last paragraph of the section would also need to be tweaked similarly. " +Kanaria is amazed at this ~kashira! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.243.215 +(add .illqtak extension) +""" - interesting review from GameFAQs" +David, if you have got a problem can't you just talk it out rarther than childishly getting others involved to block me. Please leave your fealings below as to what you believe caused this. (This goes for you as well Pak21). +Ok.... Bitch i swear to God i will fuckin beat your face now itz n and poppin i swear i noe blodds crips and all dem niggaz start wit me again ya dumbass bitch i swear i will beat ur mutha fuckin brain in iight bitch get ba to ur hooked on phonics +last time go suck a cock +" 'This is SPARTA! . You will be encouraged to edit the next time you add truth a page, as you did with to Chuck Norris. — norris " +" Uninitiated variables can also be avoided by a simple assignment statement, like X=3. Would you call that a ""default"" ? " +" Matrixism Removed Matrixism from this list as it does not appear to be a ""fictional"" religion. " +Hi Paranoid. I aggree that the Moscow page needs work. We also need to work on articles within moscow - for example, the MSU page is shocking bad. But I'd argue that most people who add to the moscow page have an honest interest and fondness for the place, or they wouldn't bother editing it. Maybe what we need is a 'List of Moscow related articles needing work' or some such. The Recreation section is bad and It been an eyesore since feb. What should we add to it? There's a F1 circuit being built in the south, anybody want to add that? also some stuff on the football clubs would be good (we can leave out the supporter violence, which is a usual thing all over the world). To be honest, I don't know much about this area - not a football fan. I'd also argue against only adding material which is positive. We shouldn't have an audience only of americans in mind. +"No one has ""forced"" you to be the small person you are who finds it necessary to stick your nose where it doesn't belong and into affairs about which you have no knowledge. Not sure how you live with yourself. " +" Question Arky...quick question. When I look at your talk page, you have a large smiley face floating on the left side of my screen, covering up the WP nav buttons. Is this a function of the fact that I'm on a wide screened laptop or is it where you want it to be? T/C " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Silver speaker Silver speaker has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this studio might not be notable enough for an article. Please review WP:CORP for relevant guidelines and improve the article if possible. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. +" How are we going to have more people join if we don't let anyone know. there are very few people looking at it. Probably just me and you? (leave me a message!) " +" Speedy deletion of Tyrell Debraux Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " +" Luke, the appropriate merger was the previous content that THF put in, when the merger was suggested. There is a need for a separate US page precisely because the issues are very different and the tort system is very different. Mike Huckabee was talking about health care costs, one of which is paying out large sums of money for medical negligence claims, in his view. " +If you want to comment above, go ahead. Whoh. There is something wrong with the sources in use. The AP article would be fine if talking about Prop 37, but using it as a source of scientific consensus is utterly absurd. +Battle of the Black Sea? By whom? The article lists the Battle of Mogadishu as also called the Battle of the Black Sea. I just wanted to check the source of where it is listed as such. Somalia is no where near the Black Sea (at least as it is known by most of the world). Unless the Somali's call the Indian Ocean the Black Sea?... +I would propose the following text Wolf [ref] has a proposed a formula for the maximal gaps where is the logarithm of the twin primes constant. This would imply the Conjecture. Normally I would have inserted it boldly but thought it better at present to bring it here for discussion first. +" It's fine except ""gathered an army of 10,000 soldiers"" suggests a traditional aermy, mercenaries etc., but his army was an army of converts, which is a central point. I suspect that the intent of ""followers"" was really to imply this. I'd suggest ""...gathered an army of 10,000 followers..."" or even ""gathered a Muslim army of 10,000 soldiers..."" " +" Official government statistics have officially adopted the short scale version, but that is really at the root of the problem. It puts reporting figures at odds with people's understanding of them. Maybe that will change in fifty years time when everyone has been educated on the short scale, but you have to appreciate that someone over the age of 50 will have been educated on the long scale. In the Oxford English Dictionary which generally has the final say in these matters the primary definition is ""1. orig. and still commonly in Great Britain: A million millions. (= U.S. trillion.)"". Neither of you addressed my question. Even if I grant that some people, in Britain, ""over the age of 50"" still ""sometimes"" equate ""billion"" with million x million, in some situations, this is still a minority, and small one at that. Why are we catering to the few? Far more people recognize billion as thousand x million. (And for the record, I'm British and in my mid-forties. I have never used ""billion"" except in the modern sense.) Shouldn't we be using what is most common? (isn't that policy?) Doesn't WP cater to the majority? Betty, you yourself just said that ""Official government statistics have officially adopted the short scale version"". So, what's the debate? - '''' " +Hi hi! Not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I needed to comment on someone's page for class and you were right below me! +" February 2011 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ruby Bridges. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 1994 " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  I would encourage you to read WP:NPOV to make sure you understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Some of your edits to Criticism of Mormonism were marginally POV - not enough for me to revert, but leaning towards a biased position. It is important to separate our beliefs from the verifiable facts of an issue. Again, I don't believe you crossed the line, but you seemed pretty close to it. Once again, thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place, and I hope to see you contribute more in the future. (Talk) +" There isn't one that says view source. All it says is ""Article"", ""Discussion"", Edit Page"", ""History"", ""Move"", and ""Watch"". It only says it on the main page. " +Ukraine related articles Please, keep out of attacking with your harmful edits Ukraine related articles. +Added Columns I added two columns, for bioavailability and half-life. All info sourced from the drugs individual wikipedia article unless otherwise sourced. +" Cleaning up citations I decided to trim two of the three cite tags and removed them. I doubt they would be missed. As for the third cite tag, I really think ""In addition, the exchange rate between ruble and USD is not adequately giving a real comparison to what the costs for Russia really are."" isn't needed, and is in violation of WP:OR. I hesitate on this last one only because it was Citation Needed this year instead of years ago. Cold7Realm, I know you suggested I wait, but I didn't trim out too much and thought this might be acceptable. Please revert if you disagree. " +So why is it you alone who is right and the other ten people who don't agree with you are wrong? Who do you think you are? I am glad you are starting to show the editors what a nutcase you are with the toothbrush comment +Are people discriminated because they are members of cults? I admit that this may happen in a few cases some countries, but I think this is an exception. +How is it a personal attack? It was a page I created from my friends account for mine. It is not intended as an attack whatsoever, but merely a well-known inside joke between friends. I find it significant enough about myself to put on my user page. Relox +"::: No. That's for independent projects. Tibet probably don't have enough sufficient topics to act indenpedently as for now. But we can always change it in the future. AQu01rius ( • Talk) " +Saxophone: Kings of Jazz The saxophone is a new instrument to the musical world in terms of time. In the specific realm of jazz is the ring leader of the genre, with the close second being the trumpet. Can you really argue with the fact that the sax has changed jazz in it's entirty, from swing to bop, to samba, to fusion and modern. Charlie Parker revolutionized jazz by playing the sax with a classical ensamble. Stan Getz led the short but very important samba movement with his smooth style and grace on his tenor sax. Michael Brecker, who recntly died of a rare form of Lukemia ( i think), was a beast of a player that revolutionized modern jazz. And then there's Jimmy Picket from Tower of Power who brought sax to the funk style. I rest my case on the issue. +YOU NEED A PUSSY, YOUR GEEK! +Bullshit= There was no violation, you removed factual material. Ditto again the above statement. I have also informed Wikipedia's administrators of your persistent attempts to insert subjective material into this article, in violation of WP:NPOV. Ditto to that There was no violation, you removed factual material. Greetings. Uncyclopedia is not associated with Wikimedia, and continuing to insert this false information is considered vandalism. Also, please heed Codeine's warnings about NPOV; opinions do not belong in Wikipedia articles. Thanks, (spill yours?) Bullshit There is a connection between Wikia and Wikimedia, Wikia pwns Uncyc. Sorry, loyalist. Your edit to Uncyclopedia Your recent edit to Uncyclopedia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''' for frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // = +user:Bbb23 Well my submission are being kept deleted and I am extremely discouraged to make any further. Last time I followed appropriate steps and submission speedily deleted. Draft-Get help from chat-Once chat says ready submit draft- and the rest is article accepted by editors. And my ignorance is I am asking at the chat that article is why heavily modified. If I did not mention in chat, It will not be tagged deletation and will not get deleted because It was approved and edited by +DRV I didn't make the first of the pair of comments, DavidGerard did. If my comment was inappropriate, his is too. -talk +Regreattably it doesn't seem possible to transclude pages from other Wikimedia projects, so a link to your German userpage (which you already have) will have to suffice, sorry.  雲‍水 +" I love you! My heart is yours! For being the most special Wikipedian in the world, I award you with heart. I love you! User:PhaedrielPhaedriel" +"""I understand the points you are making and I encourage you to continue to raise them in talk when you are next able to do so"" I am able to do so. However, the page is locked. Therefore the points remain silenced. We can continue chatting about procedural matters until you get your important points through my thick skull. Or you are free to unlock the content & perhaps risk massive vandalism & unthinkable horrible things. Your call chief. " +Thoughtshowering... delete? I say we delete the thought shower segment or drastically improve it. Up until now, it didn't even mention that it was offensive BECAUSE of the epilepsy connection until the end of the segment. Fix it or get rid of it, it's nearly unreadable. +of the United Kingdom +You also really need to get a life, do you think spending all day on wikipedia trying to stop vandalism is worthwhile? If so you really are a Fruit Loop! +Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!. Why not become a registered user? There are many benefits such as a watchlish. Have a look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry. | talk 11:52, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) +Sorry!. I didn't realise that it was advertising. If it is against Wiki rules, please feel free to remove any images that I upload. Please just let myself know on ) 10:00, 11 November 2008 Thanks. +Your GA nomination of Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ The article Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ for things needed to be addressed. +" Archiving Are you sure all those pages need an archive setup ? (open channel) I believe so, they didn't have one before and now they'll be enabled for the OCA script for whenever it becomes necessary. Is there a reason not to have that? it's not affecting the talk pages until someone decides to use it right? B E C K Y S A Y L E S  My concern is a ""mass"" setup should be discussed first. (open channel) Becky, yes. Generally, shouldn't be the only archiving on article talk pages. If archiving is to be set up on those pages, it should be automatic archiving using . Using that will still allow usage of OCA if there is a section with no timestamp or something else preventing automatic archiving. Also, talk pages should generally not be archived if they are less than 75K in size. Please go back through your list and change all of them to use instead of . I'll also note that setting up archiving on talk pages like this usually only occurs once a discussion is started on the talk page to see if there is any objection, if there is consensus or no comments, or if the page is above the 250K threshold. Thank you. — {{U|}} (e • t • c) I have undone the addition of {{Archive basics}}. Can you help me understand the difference? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by ""OCA shouldn't be the only archiving on article talk pages""? Using {{User:MiszaBot/config}} sets up automatic archiving. But {{Archive basics}} doesn't, it just sets up for use of OCA. So if someone wanted automatic archiving, {{User:MiszaBot/config}} could still be added, right? Help:Archiving a talk page says archiving is suggested when there's resolved or stale discussions. So isn't it unnecessary/improbable to have a discussion on archiving resolved/stale discussions?  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  Sorry about the delay. I got got up in some `stuff` that prevented me from replying sooner. OneClickArchiver is intended for archiving a user's own talk page. It is also useful for archiving sections that bots don't archive automatically on other talk pages for various reasons. While it is acceptable to use only OneClickArchiver on a user's talk page if that is what they wish and the size of their page doesn't get out of hand, bots should archive all other talk pages. Not sure if that is any clearer, but it is my interpretation of the current consensus. — {{U|}} (e • t • c) " +You overtly undertake bold indignantly grotesque coldness over candid kindheartedness. CountyOfKent (talk) Furthermore, unless considerably knowledgeable, you ought undertake avoidance, stay silent. However objectionable, leave everything +Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Columbine conspiracy theories. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Mean Why you so mean??!!! I didn't do anything to you!! 149.140.33.64 +I can forward you that email if you like so you can confirm. +" Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for the following reason; persistent vandalism. Please see our blocking policy for more information. —  (talk) 19:09, 09 January 2008" +I hope the lead has now settled to a stable state. Please take a look at it now. I dont think your prose has been altered by myself or sarvagnya, but feel free to change it if required. +WHAT A FREAK! HOLY CRAP YO, HAVE YOU SEEN SOME OF HIS PHOTOS? MAN, THIS GUY NEEDS TO GET A LIFE! ANYBODY AGREE? HAAHHAHAAHAHA! +Megadeth album article This clearly isn't the first time you've made your own unconstructive edits. Put your goggles back on you nerd and sort yourself out. My edit was perfectly valid. Suck on it. +" Did you hear this with relation to an Euclidean topology or some other naturally occuring topology? It cannot be redundant in general since if we take a non-empty set X and choose a non-empty proper subset U of X, then the ""topology"" on X consisting only of U would satisfy the two axioms you stated but would not contain X nor the empty set. Of course, this is a trivial example. Suppose we call a collection of subsets of a set X a ""relevant topology"" (this is not a real name; just something I made up just now so it is easier to talk about these things) if it satisfies every axiom except possibly that ""X and the empty set are in the topology"". Then a non-empty set with a ""relevant topology"" that is Hausdorff (here ""Hausdorff"" means that any two distinct points are separated by neighborhoods; the same definition as the usual one on topological spaces) would necessarily have to include the empty set in the ""topology"". Thus for ""many"" topological spaces, requiring the empty set to be open is indeed redundant. On the other hand, the requirement that the whole set X be open is in general not redundant with fairly natural topologies (I suppose). For example, take any topological space X and let Y be a set containing X as a proper subset. Declare a subset of Y to be open if and only if it is in the topology on X. Then this ""relevant topology"" on Y satisfies every axiom that a topological space should satisfy except that Y itself is not open. For example, X could be some Euclidean space with the standard topology (and Y could be any set containing X as a proper subset). But this construction is probably not very interesting since (at least as far as I can see) there is not any new information or insight obtained. This might be too elementary for you, but I wrote the following section in open set a while back that roughly describes why the axioms are the way they are and the motivation for the abstract formulation of a topology: Open_set#Motivation. The following discussion at MathOverflow may perhaps be more appropriate to your question: Do the empty set and the entire set really need to be open?. T " +Possibly. But it wasnt because of the war. +Thanks Thanks for the heads-up about changing redirects to direct links! I'll change back the mistakes. +Governor of the Bank of Jamaica.Im jamaican and i know for a fact that Mr.latibeaudiere resigned on october 30 2009 please look it up fine keep your bullshit article because i know you know nothing about jamaica,nobody relies on wikipedia here because its full of impearlist assholes like you.up yours with best regards +Problems with comunication? I sense some angst coming from pretty much all your writings. However, I love the attempt to sound smart when you write by stretching out all your sentences into the longest ever recorded sentences, and saying rude things, and continuing to ramble on my user talk page like this, and going, and going, and calling people idiots. IMO it might be possible that you're in need of counseling. I have a feeling that you will be responding really fast too, since you seem to be on here 23-24 hours a day. Are you married? no no, it's ok, lets just talk about it, now come on. +Will one turn it green only if live-broadcasting from the border gate is presented ? +Thank you! Becoming a Wikipedian is a calculated decision after years of reliance! =] Hope my contributions are enjoyed. Seanydelight +What a tramp Talk about a bargain basement, trash bag ho. Jeez... +"== Re: Telstra Article == Hello. I am new to Wiki but thought I had read the T&Cs; fairly well. I am surprised at the number of citations you are demanding for my edit to the Telstra mobile page. Many of the facts you are seeing citations for are indesputible engineering realities and hence you wont find a seperate statement from someone claiming same (although you may find news paper articles backing some of the claims). The points made about 850 having superior coverage to 2100 cant be disputed and I would ask since that being the case, what sort of citation should I be looking for to back up the statement? I accept referencing Whirlpool for carrier customer numbers is a bit slack. The only reason I did that was that in that discussion thread was a neatly pulled together list of each carriers end of year reports showing their customer base - which highlighted the point that Telstra is the largest carrier by subscriber base at this time. Considering that it is not appropriate to reference a forum thread, how can I best reference this to Wikipedia's satisfaction? I also note that you removed the citations that pointed back to Telstra.com. The third party aspect of your requirement there is almost not appropriate when you are refering to direct history or a Telstra product reference on the topic. Specifically, the references to Telstra having the first automated mobile network are hard to find anywhere else but on Telstra's media pages - because quite frankly no other operator is going to want to talk about it, and no other Australian source of any repute exists on the internet that would be bothered backing up such claims that I have been able to find (again I dont like quoting news papers because there is no traceability as to the reliability of their sources in the first place - an encyclopedia based on newspapers is a sure way to enshrine into history some editors' warped viewpoint which may or may not be right, but someone reading something and seeing a reference pointing at a news paper may not recognise as simply being another editors point of view. Please, can you outline how I can more effectively cite elements of my contribution and to an extent justify your requirements for citations where I have not yet been able to find any suitable meaningful references? Hi. I'm not sure if you have checked out Wikipedia:Reliable sources which also links to many other wiki policies. If there is a few lines in the article which is in a source you can cite it more then once using [cite information here] once then adding on the other sentences with in the article. Whirlpool isn't a reliable source but other if it links to a source you could use that source instead but as long as it's reliable source and a third party source. Websites Telstra and any company it owns isn't a third party source which can be seen a bias and can be seen as a point of view which it way we use third party sources (See Self-published sources). Newspapers can be used whether or not it's a website or you can just reference the title of the article, name of the paper, page, date it was printed and who the story was written by, As you can trace Newspapers who's stories may not be online or the story was before the internet was around. I hope this helps. Thanks for the warning But I already tried the talk page, and rather than discussing the issue there, user: Ryulong opted to revert. I notice only I'm accused of edit warring. Does war require two parties, or are you just supporting the use of Wikipedia for spam and fighting hard for it? Sorry, you're wrong. Admins are warned and blocked for edit warring, just like non-admins. It's not a special privilege account to edit war. Admins can be blocked also. But, I see where the writing on this wall is. I did err on the long side, apologies. ' talk You've lost me? Shouldve been one more section down. Your were right, a 48 hour block was too long per policy and I'm sorry for overdoing it. ' [ +edit: cool stop sign dude, it makes your warning almost seem threatening -snake out- Sintheg2 +Gigantic Pictures You have recreated the deleted page Gigantic Pictures. It was deleted under our speedy-deletion criteria A7, which covers articles that do not state the importance of their subject. If you think this has been in error you can appeal it with me by letting me know how the subject is important and satisfies our notability criteria for companies. Alternatively, you can request a review at Deletion review. Please do not simply recreate the article if you disagree, as this will only result in it being deleted and possibly locked to prevent recreation. — ✎ +" Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Spyware. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Chat " +It's not that simple. +Robert (Rob) Fernandez Tampa, Florida, USA I have more shall I share +Well it ain't my fault that your fellow admin is to thick to check the history, when I deleted your polite warning as read, and then proceedes to aggravate the nest +Notability of Peter Stone I removed the notability tag from Peter Stone (Degrassi), because I have added some references. +(But what's this?! Fergus at CV.) Ok, +I fucked your dad last night you fucking whore assed cunt. +Cilla Black How sad you are. I'm off to carry on with my life. Good luck finding one for yourself. +" No it doesn't. It misrepresents the source material on multiple levels. ""Some of those colleagues take issue""? It says it infuruates his former collegeages. ""Heated""? Now, here's your POV exposed. You're going to characterize the tone of Lopez's comments? And what's with the use of legalese? ""Testimony?"" ""Attested"". What courtroom are we talking about here? ""not acceepted by the majority of his colleagues"" It says that his theories are ""absolutely ludicrous"". This is a perfect example of trying to ""neutralize"" the source rather than being neutral. The current text neutrally presents the actual source material in an accurate manner. Your version does not. " +Fuck of You fuck of...212.253.147.120 +" Your userpage As I said before I like your userpage a lot. Would you mind if I made a few tweaks to make some of the text more readable? You can revert my changes if you don't like them. ✉ " +Molesting Most preist cant deal with duece in the holy see +No maybe not because if I try to I'll be just turned away on the excuse that my case cannot be considered valid since I was disruptive. There's no point in trying to make a ANI report against an admin no matter what I think or believe. If I can't convincingly prove it then I better keep my comments and claims to myself. I'll keep that in mind. Also it's discouraging to see that my unblock was turned away because 24 hours isn't a long time. +That's not how citing works. What claim is being used by what book? +"==The deletion of the term Bulgarian in this article and its substitution with the term Macedonian is POV == Throughout the Middle Ages and until the early 20th century, there was no clear formulation or expression of a distinct Macedonian ethnicity. The Slavic speaking majority in the Region of Macedonia had been referred to (both, by themselves and outsiders) as Bulgarians, and that is how they were predominantly seen since 10th,Who are the Macedonians? Hugh Poulton, C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 2000, ISBN 1850655340, p. 19-20.Средновековни градови и тврдини во Македонија, Иван Микулчиќ, Македонска академија на науките и уметностите — Скопје, 1996, стр. 72.Formation of the Bulgarian nation: its development in the Middle Ages (9th-14th c.) Academician Dimitŭr Simeonov Angelov, Summary, Sofia-Press, 1978, pp. 413-415. up until the early 20th century.Center for Documentation and Information on Minorities in Europe, Southeast Europe (CEDIME-SE) - ""Macedonians of Bulgaria"", p. 14. It is generally acknowledged that the ethnic Macedonian identity emerged in the late 19th century or even later.Krste Misirkov, On the Macedonian Matters (Za Makedonckite Raboti), Sofia, 1903: ""And, anyway, what sort of new Macedonian nation can this be when we and our fathers and grandfathers and great-grandfathers have always been called Bulgarians?""{{Cite book | last1 = Zielonka | first1 = Jan | last2 = Pravda | first2 = Alex | title = Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe | year = 2001 | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = Oxford | isbn = 978-0-19-924409-6 | pages = 422|quote=Unlike the Slovene and Croatian ide +I know this article probably faithfully represents local mythology, it is a badly flawed myth ... either it is just that way, or someone needs to check what they've written and align it properly with some sort of historical reference. Assuming that J.C existed (before anyone picks my grammar apart!); There is no record in the new testament stating he was born in a stable, that's a misinterpretation, and as far as I know a fairly recent one, based on references to animals and mangers being inside a house. The house in question is in Bethlehem according to two gospels and a prophecy. Although the place of birth is disputed (and, I think, it is generally thought the original gospels had him being born in Nazareth) the passages about Mary and Joseph staying in a house/stable relate to a supposed trip to Bethlehem. Bethlehem is a long way from Nazareth Either the story should say Bethlehem, or the stone is some sort of crib from a house in Nazareth, or the myth itself is based on an alternative historical version (I was going to say inaccurate, but given we've already got two contradictory and both disputed accounts of possible event it's all a bit of a matter of opinion anyway!) +Dear Arthur, Again LOOOK. I didnt reverse 14 revisions. Some among those 14 were reverts & autobots. I did include the good edits into the version I save. I do consider others. U took out a chunk @ the end which is important 4 understanding y the event is listed under controversy. Did I say I own it? No I didnt. Thanks. 70.108.92.126 +How about you let us all know once you have gazed into your crystal ball. +Support The most well known Las Vegas is Las Vegas, Nevada. There's no need to have the state name follow the city. Also, I do believe we need an article for the Metro Area and the City Proper but the article doesnt need to be followed by (city). Just have one be Las Vegas, and the other be the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area. All this discussion is unnecessary. +". Your remarks on Talk:Pallar are accurate, and our articles in that area could benefit from someone editing them brutally. (disp.) " +Wow, digital media is really here. HTML5 is a reality, WP should have embedded video clips into articles by now ;) They just announced Nintendo 3DS and look - it has two cameras on the outside of the device, capable of taking 3D photos. Woo hah, it could make wonders. I usually don't make a fuss about pesky material. I sympathize with your concern, however I try to be cautious in questions relating to due weight. The rule of thumb that guiding me in WP editing is that if some editor believes some material is relevant and there is no verifiability issues we should let it be. +very urgent Hi this is a cool dude calling for a special attention to nadar (caste)article. the list of notable personalities contains weasel words and names that cant be found not alone in the wiki but also in entire google data base. special deletion and auto deletion of such crap should be maintainted § +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lebron. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Test ping Test. +": ""I got wood for sheep"" is how that phrase goes. " +OOOOOOOH TEABAG OOOOOOOOOOH YER BECAUSE I DID OH YER OH YA OH YES BECAUSE I DID WOAH TEABAGGED +- Ryda Wong is an asshole vandaliser +Sorry, forgot to sign. 20:51, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC) +User:VanTucky has forgotten to read +Articles are not supposed to contain criticism sections, partly because they cannot be written from a neutral point of view. +It doesn't matter, I'll use other usernames to edit when I need to. Thanks for showing how pointless all of Wikipedia's policies are because certain editors are above the rules. +" I'm glad to see that you have continued to put ""bad faith"" in nearly every post you make. I see no reason to continue this discussion, and your posts at RSN and my replies are already open to all scrutiny you can want. " +I've sourced the reversion. It should be noted that Hamidullah uses the Gregorian calendar, so there is a discrepancy between his dates and the way they are quoted in Wikipedia which, per the Manual of Style, converts them to Julian. 213.123.194.188 +seriously.... now come on.... +Human beings are basically fu*king idiots!!! +making false allegations to mislead, and +I think That ^ ^ ^ I think that I am going to sue you for being mean to me. I'll get my llawer, and you can get yours! lets see who wins in that fight. Ha! Love Ya - xxxx +Just EXACTLY what I was expecting from this RAG! +" Then, what I propose is to leave the ""Regional lockout"" category alone and to either to apply the Yes=Green/No=Red to the ""3D enabled"" category or ditch it altogether as well as other articles containing similar coloured cells for 3D products. This is the only way we'll make a consensus I suppose. " +Okay, Vidkun, basic English. A bad faith accusation would be one that the person who made the accusation did not actually believe. A good faith accusation is one that the accuser actually believes. I actually believed my accusation -or actually, not even that, *****I simply asked for someone to look into it***** In either case, it was a good faith accusation. Since you clearly do not understand the difference between 'good faith' and 'bad faith' what those terms are, and how they are used, YOU need to reassess your claims to any credibility in wikipedia. Why don't you search the term 'good faith', you'll see I am right, and your paragraph above is predicated on not knowing the meaning of the term? I did not make a bad faith accusation. I was acting in good faith. YOU have been making false accusations against me, saying I am acting in bad faith when I did not. What are you going to do to correct your error? God only knows what havoc you have been creating in wikipedia with your slim grasp of terms. If you can't get the first principle right,... 129.133.127.244 +The article isn't about Christians only, but all of Christianity, and what has been done in its name. I agree that many of the aid efforts need to be discussed, showing some positive contribution by Christianity (if not in the article, through a link to an article on the Contributions of Christianity), but then it also needs to show what has happened illy in its name. Al Qaeda would be a destructive force in Islam that most Muslims would reject without a problem, but still such discussion would belong in Islam. Of course notice must be taken in the aid efforts that many organizations (though not all) require conversion or similar measures to recieve the aid. That is something that Jesus would also be against, IMO. We should discuss as much as possible, good article size is 30-50 kb excluding markup, as in the brackets for links, image code, reference markup, etc. So we have plenty of room to add such things, given Christianity being such a large subject. The witch hunts are certainly Christian, as are the crusades, though not all Christians supported either.... the Catholic Church, for example, ran the Crusades and the Orthodox city of Constanople was the sole target of one Crusade as the crusaders sacked the city and never actually fulfilled their mission. All of this should be mentioned briefly. +wah Some guy spammed you. Looks like I fucking saved your ass. +" Oppose. Because the proposed title is inaccurate. Not every daikon is white. There are red, black, and green daikon. , , , ,, , and . I'd like to ask editors who voted ""support"". Can you call them ""white radish""? " +It is mentioned under 'Interchange formats' +Comparison to Hitler The comparison to Hitler is a laughable POV with no real sources that serves absolutely no purpose to the article. +Bud Swenson http://gemsofislamism.tripod.com/ +I agree.. letting it run its course would have been the best option.. rather then trying to take it out of the admins hands and move into an article without consensus especially when the article was up for being deleted for being listcruft.. just my opinion. glad AfD did its job. - +Chattambi swamigal He is a goonda turned swami,who contributed nothing to the nair community.He was never an authority on anything.I would like to consider Ayyan kali much above him since Two Dalits(KR Narayanan and KG Balakrishan) could reach top positions in India as a result of the humble work started by him many decades ago. Which are the old tamil texts he interpreted?The great tamil treatise,Thirukkural or chilappathikarm have no reference to nair. +" Why, thank you! I'll respond by saying, ""Ditto"". - (Talk) " +Also, i'm not sure if you're aware, but betacommandbot now goes around checking image descriptions, such as making sure each page has a fair use rationale written for it. I made a change to the above image which should stop betacommandbot, but FYI pages they appear on need linking to now. +" Turns out that two days ago, someone had a better idea! Whipp " +What about some kind of table, like using the Wikitable class, to keep all the authors name and then all the games in a column for easier reading? I'd agree about sorting games alphabetically rather than chronologically. We should probably just put a couple games for each designer, 3 or 4? Not sure the list of game designers page should be an exhaustive list of what they have produced, that info can just go in their article. +" For the malformed requests language, ""Did you submit your request by using subst:requested move?"" can be read to imply that the request is malformed -because- the request has not been submitted using subst:requested move. Can we try a different wording, e.g. ""Please be sure you have not submitted..."" or something like that? よ! " +"::::SarekOfVulcan, I think you are not aware of the larger context, covered in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Connecticut#vandalism-reversion and other management of Connecticut articles. I have been trying to change the negative atmosphere on Connecticut articles. There has been some agreement that there is a problem and some support for my type of activity to address the problem, notably ncram " +" Sometime ago this very same information was stated on this page, and I deleted it. I repeat what I said then: Stating that in most dialects, including the standard, /ʎ/ is pronounced [lj], like English in ""million"" is simply wrong! Just because olhos and óleos are pronounced the same, it does not mean that /ʎ/ has changed to /lj/; it may be that /lj/ was changed into /ʎ/. In fact, that's my perception: the sound in óleos is /ʎ/, not /lj/. The same holds for ""li"" in família. I don't think I'm mistaken, but I will try to find the book the article cites." +We don't have to. Nor should we. That ABC said it is good enough, *if* we believe ABC to be an RS. Suppose they had named someone - lets say GS. Are you suggesting that in that case we could go back and ask GS if he had really said X to ABC? Sounds like OR to me +" Logical inconsistency: House is reported both as a ""subgenre"" of Disco (see template), and of Electronic Music (see template). Some ""guys"" need to keep calm their exagerate ego. " +" overview section must go We know that the overview section is contrary to article content guidelines. Editors who are angry about how long this article is might like to start cutting there. The table of causes seems worthwhile and could go in the history section where Tinbergen is discussed. The Principles list is also packed with information and maybe could live as its own section? The rest of the material is good, but most of it isn't sourced and most of it duplicates material that's either in the body or in the lead. Left to my own devices, I would rescue the Tinbergen table and the list of principles but then mass delete the rest. (talk) " +Misuse of sources This article has been edited by a user who is known to have misused sources to unduly promote certain views (see WP:Jagged 85 cleanup). Examination of the sources used by this editor often reveals that the sources have been selectively interpreted or blatantly misrepresented, going beyond any reasonable interpretation of the authors' intent. Diffs for each edit made by Jagged 85 are listed at Cleanup4. It may be easier to view the full history of the article. A script has been used to generate the following summary. Each item is a diff showing the result of several consecutive edits to the article by Jagged 85, in chronological order. Diophantus: +Pics What program are you using to make those awesome graphics? +I will give it a whirl. Thank you so much. ) +Money In The Bank II +" i find it funny that Mexia, if prounounced correctly in spanish would be very close to Mejilla (or cheek). þ ¡Æ! " +THE MOST HIGH MINISTRIES +Okay I'll try not to do that anymore. I'm sorry. Do you accept my apology sir? +" Duckfan8: Thats okay. I saw the 1st ep. It was good but I can`t wait to see ""DIng a Ling"" and the madge eps." +You're mostly correct in that false statements, if correctly quoted, can still be printed in here. However, I've seen some exceptions to that. Gore Vidal defamed William F. Buckley in Esquire Magazine, and Buckley not only successfully sued Vidal but the magazine as well. I don't think that anything in this article has crossed the line, but obviously more responses by Savage should be in this article? How do I prove that Savage said something, BTW? All of Savage's quotes that I put in this article are things that I've heard him say, but how can I prove that he said it? I have to find a source who has transcribed Savage's statements? What if the source is incorrect? That doesn't matter? So logically speaking, I could have my own website and print statements by Savage and then cite my own website as a source in this article? +fuck you! fuck you! YOU ARE UNCIVIL TO CONTINUE TO WASTE MY TIME AND TO CONTINUE TO WRITE ME MESSAGE! I DONT CARE ABOUT WIKIPEDIA I JUST USE IT FOR MY USER PAGE SO FUCK YOU HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! SUICIDE YOURSELF PLEASE YOU ARE A DIRTY DUST IN THIS SOCIETY. MY USER PAGE CANNOT BE DELETED SO FUCK YOU HAHAHAH LAMER WASTING PEOPLE TIME IS CRIME. I WILL SUE YOUR MIND. +" Both pictures are annoying and demonstrate self-evident emotions. [talk] " +It has actually been a case on both Cold Case Sverige,Efterlyst and the trial got media attention. But as DGG sayd its not a speedy. have a nice evening! +Associação Académica de Coimbra 2 One user did it all wrong after has read your requests and surveys. It's a shame that someone is trying to ruin the work of others just to promote his own stupid, ignorant or biased view about one topic. I know you didn't agree with his actions. I know it isn't your fault but it really pissed me off. I hope someone would be able to revert all the mess he did. +No, I had the issue right. I did take it to the discussion page. People like you weren't honest enough to actually discuss it. Instead you cried to the moderators. The correct action would be to NOT undo my edits but instead engage in the discussion. Sorry that was too hard for you to deal with.129.59.79.123 +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +lead paragraphs Paragraph two (I edited it to make it a separate paragraph) and paragraph three seem to contadict each other. Paragraph three seems to imply that being barefoot is a matter of choice and if you are barefoot because you don't have shoes, you are not a barefoot. Enlighten me if I am wrong because this is definitely what the editor really says with the paragraphs. t +MFI is a self-made cult, which was establish by younas (A former disciple of gohar shahi) who was kicked-out by GS in his life. He (Younas) formed this MFI to take revenge with Gohar Shahi of his exile from ASI and started preaching self-made teachings and linked them to Gohar Shahi. The truth is younas and MFI has nothing to do with Gohar Shahi and they are preaching selfmade teachings using the name and pictures of Gohar Shahi. I would suggest following to end this edit war pertaining to younas and MFI: The name & Pictures of Gohar Shahi is not used in their articles. The name of Younas should be written as Muhammad Younas and not Younas Algohar, which he wrotes just to linked with Gohar Shahi. He also has hijacked the website i.e. www.goharshahi.com, which is banned by government of Pakistan due to its blasphyous contents. The reference should be provide for each statement/claim. Above three are the suggestions, hopefully you will comply with them.This is the only option in my view. +You did not read what got written. I said and I quote No personal attacks were made on talkpages Which what is what got said in the block log which is incorrect. +" So what do we include in the article? Trying to start summarizing what we've found in the above: We've sources for three different restaurants in Harlem during the 20's or 30's, all within a block of each other. While ""Wells Supper Club""/""Wells Restaurant"" was the latecomer of the three, it's the best documented. " +Great North Road 'destination' query As far as I'm aware, the Gt North rd goes to Edinburgh, not Newcastle. This is indicated: (c.f. http://www.thegreatnorthroad.co.uk/bookcontents.htm) What's with the four tildes? +I really hate you tommy i dont understand why you cant be actually nice for a sec and listen to my input. now you are being a pussy bitch by deleting everything i post. I hope bad things happen to you tommy. Bad things. Fuck you +F YOU: YOU IDIOT! YOU ARE PROBABLY JUST JEALOUS OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU CANT ADD 1 and 1!!!!!!! I WILL MAKE YOU SORRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +Does Operation Tarnegol count? not sure if it counts as an airliner. Any thoughts? +Why? Why do you revert the truth? The contect marked is either not NPOV or is not verifiable and in fact the contect which is not verifiable is mostly untrue, that's why it's not. For example the colonel did not develope this game a team of programmers hired my the Army did. That's just one example. +You I'll be back. You haven't seen the last of me. +For simplicity You can delete what you wish, but I suspect we have the same friends. Perhaps consider why I am posting this *after* the deletions. It just makes things easier. But whatever works for you, I'm only asking so I recall come this weekend. In any case I hope you are keeping well. We'll be able to sort this out Rod, and if it wasn't clear if you like I'll email you my phone number. 86.176.170.210 +Ban this vandal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Damirux he's an idiot Tesla was a serb. Fucking idiot +" Try paying closer attention: the Examiner article pre-dates the show ""The Dating Guy"", as well as Sohmer's stated timetable of being made aware of its existence and the circumstances of its similarity to (what he considers the uncredited/unpaid use of) the IP he had already developed. Saying the Examiner ""avoided"" mentioning an unfair or inaccurate characterization. 76.31.236.91 " +" I hope admins will respond to the attacks in this post appropriately. I've done nothing to even suggest I'm a Muslim, much less a fundementalist. It's true that the mainstream Jamaat i Islami in Bangladesh has tempered its views due to public pressure, that doesn't mean I support them. I'm a secularist. All this other nonsense he's stating what with phrases like ""filthy hindu"" is part of his game of browbeating Muslim wikipedians, something he's done to many other editors before. " +[[Image:Tyrone Biggums.jpg|right|thumb|Chappelle as +You also forgot the most important one of all: Blaisphobia, which is the fear or dislike of Ms Céline Blais, a lousy math teacher who cannot answer her own questions. +Ok, without personal attacks: They never developed stereo cameras, just stereoscopes. ) +Hi again, KS. I just saw your response on the noticeboard and wanted to thank you for your understanding. It's possible that the survey you received was part of a series of Editor Engagement Experiments that being performed to try and get editors editing again. And also to fix some of the problems we've found. You can find more information at WP:E3 if you are interested. We are also discusssing issues and leaving suggestions on the talk page there. If you have any improvements or thoughts you'd like to share, they would be most welcome. Thanks. 64.40.57.45 +Hi again, I am trying to write about the Blue Diamond Ball. There will be releases sent out January 02, 2009. This is for a good cause. Any help would be appreciated +"} try { TABline = console.readLine(); TABif (line.length() == 0) { TABTABthrow new EmptyLineException(""The line read from console was empty!""); TAB} TABconsole.printLine(""Hello %s!"" % line); TABconsole.printLine(""The program ran successfully""); } catch (EmptyLineException e) { TABconsole.printLine(""Hello!""); } catch (Exception e) { TABconsole.printLine(""Error: "" + e.message()); } finally { TABconsole.printLine(""The program terminates now""); " +Regarding edits made during March 30 2007 (UTC) to User:Meno25 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. +See graphe paranomon. +Xavi Pons Why is included in the team Stobard, Xavier Pons?. The spanish driver competed with Nupel Global Racing team. +re: religious... Harry Potter Is it possible to answer this guy's objections? I can't find an authoritative poll done of Christians to test their attitudes towards Harry Potter, and unless I do I don't think there's any way I could give him what he wants. +Oppose. It's better to maintain consistency by following WP:RUS. The arguments presented are not good enough to warrant application of WP:IAR. +The topic under discussion on the article is in fact the holocaust, so bringing up the holocaust was not some attempt at godwining the conversation, it was directly on point to the content dispute that is ongoing. +You are a stupid *******== You accuse me of sock puppetry. Then u send me a link to the page to defend myself (unless that was autmatic) and then i added stuff to defend myself. And then somone (maybe the 50 different accoutns you have, or your *** friends deleted it) so now you wont even let me defend myself. You stupid ****** I dont care if i get banned for this. just because i reverted your edits, you do this. == +who knows maybe i might get to talk after that. +.Forsite Forsyth Boresyth.Forsyth sucks +" ArbCom Hi, Michael. Your post, ""Response by Matt Lewis"", seems to be missing an important bit. It says: ""This user has resigned from the WIkipedia because of this issue, and with respect to Scolaire, I mus."" I presume it was meant to read ""I must..."", so if nothing else I would need to know what the rest of it was, so as to know if I need to respond. Thanks. " +You must have a VERY small penis. 207.237.233.142 +Oppose If his son claimed that their family name was Orsini (as per Croatian sources) and if he signed a contract as Giorgio Orsini - I do not see any reason for doubting what were his personal names. +" My post below should answer your first point. If there are no standards for criticism to be included, we would just have an endless tirade of insults and name-calling in every article. And Nixon is mentioned in the Washington Post article as a milestone in time (as in ""Beginning with Nixon's administration)In any case, the WP article's criticism section is far better in that it mentions specific events that originate criticism, and not just the opinion stemming from those events. That's my whole problem with the criticism section of this article. " +" Pasted here is the section I removed. The research is commendable, but would be more applicable in a section on modern criticms of slavery. Even then it appears to be original research because the sources cited are not arguing against slavery on the basis of textual criticism, they are arguing against authenticity of these books of the Bible. Essentially, this sentence is an original argument that the New Testament doesn't support slavery, because certain Pauline epistles are not genuine apostolic writings. It would be better to cite this argument from a source who has actually argued, ""Christianity doesn't support slavery, because the slavery-tolerant passages in the NT are not authentic.""69.19.14.35 However, most scholars believe that these particular Pauline epistles were not actually authored by Paul., page 385Udo Schnelle, Apostle Paul: His Life and Theology (2003), [english translation published 2005]Hermann Detering, The Falsified Paul (1995)Stephen G. Wilson, Luke and the Pastoral Epistles (1979)Norman Perrin, The New Testament: An Introduction (1974)W. Bujard, Stilanalytische Untersuchungen zum Kolosserfrief als Beitrag zur Methodik von Sprachvergleichen (1973)E J Goodspeed, Key to Ephesians (1956), page 6Mitton, The Epistle to the Ephesians (1951), pages 245-255Alfred Loisy, The Origins of the New Testament (1936)Percy Neale Harrison, The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles (1921)Ferdinand Christian Baur, Paul, the Apostle of Jesus Christ: His Life and Works (1845)also partially advocated by Desiderius Erasmus" +Probably a good idea. Frankly though I don't see what the controversy is about here. +" I'm not the ""paid editor"" to which you referred, but I am gravely concerned by the proposal for a change to the terms of use that describes edits as ""deception"" and allows anyone to make such accusations against any editor at any time. It is impossible for editors to prove they are *not* receiving some form of benefit. The examples of ""benefit"" (which the WMF has tried to obfuscate now that some people have noticed the expansiveness of the proposal) includes things like receiving a t-shirt or a meal (any ""money, goods or services""). Unfortunately, there's a great deal of handwaving about paid editing, but very little evidence that there's any greater bias in edits that are paid for than edits that are not. A large number of the articles created in the latest paid editing ""scandal"" are still present, and many that were deleted still easily met our notability standards. There is not a good faith editor who hasn't received some sort of benefit or reward from their work on Wikipedia. Nobody has yet demonstrated that people who are paid do any worse at editing Wikipedia than people who aren't paid. Meanwhile, there's lots of evidence that people who want to push a point of view will not hesitate to accuse editors of being paid or otherwise having a serious conflict of interest (q.v., the Arbcom archives). The proposal is one more tool in the arsenal for people who are motivated to go after their opponents, and does absolutely nothing at all to improve the project. " +" Where would you suggest adding it? I haven't seen any source that traces its use. I may have read that it appeared on posters in 1972, but I'd have to find who said that - perhaps Collier. The documentary about the Millennium festival used it as the title. In proposal3 I'd dropped mention of it from the festival paragraph. The documentary might be better placed in the ""media"" section. ·:· ·:· " +" Are you a fair editor? how about you be fair, and start removing the ""criticisms"" section from all the major players for president, like you do for Obama, keeping him nice and safe. You can start with the 1000 word criticism for Mike Huckabee. But I get the feeling you aren't interested." +Logos There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. \talk +Wondering if you could... Use your oversight powers to delete my user page history? There is sensitive personal information on there that I would like removed. Everything up to the most recent edit? +I deleted the following statement from the article because it is absurd: The more shows that a cow or bull attends and wins, the more desirable their genetic makeup will become. +" Also, when I click on the link to the article in Hindi, there doesn't seem to be an article there! speak! " +" Then use . That's what it's for. ···? · Talk to Nihonjoe " +Vandalism of Cherokee Language Pages If you redirect and blank this page again, I will initiate WP:RFA for vandalism. You are not part of our culture nor do you known our language and you are disrupting my work. +Behindwoods rating Behindwoods isn't a notable firm for rating enough to be included in an encyclopedia article. Please try to find ratings from bigger companies/websites/magazines etc. such as Filmfare magazine, Kumudam magazine, Ananda Vikatan, Yahoo polls/ratings and such. More importantly the Vijay article needs information about his job as a brand ambassador and what he does with the Chennai Super Kings. It would be nice if you could get as much information about those as possible and add them into the article, with care please. Also there are several people who tend to vandalise the article too much. Please undo or delete their edits as soon as you see them and help save the Vijay article from such people. Thanks. +" Anon Hi. I was just reading your talk page and wondered what ""anonymous post removed"" was all about. Im not trying to be stupid, I'm just new. Thanks! 11:49, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)" +I have given my reasons why I find that evidence insufficient. You argue that the primary source is Langan himself. OK, I would like to hear the arguments based on statements from this primary source that he is an advocate of ID. Because I don't believe he is one, based on the evidence I have seen. +Suggestion: branch list like so: * Aerospace Engineering - The design of aircraft, spacecraft and related topics. * Chemical Engineering - The conversion of raw materials into usable commodities. * Civil Engineering - The design and construction of public and private works, such as bridges and buildings. * Computer & Electrical Engineering - The entire process of designing and coding computers, electronics, and computer related devices. * Mechanical engineering - The design of physical or mechanical systems, such as engines, kinematic chains and vibration isolation equipment. may need to change the description, but you get the idea... +November 2009 Please note that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a free web host, social networking site, contact directory, or advertising site. An encyclopedia article does not exist in order to provide contact information. Consequently the article Bextec will soon be deleted. While you are welcome to contribute to editing and improving the encyclopedia, please do not add material intended to promote your group. Also, Wikipedia accepts articles only for subjects which are notable enough to have received substantial coverage in reliable independent published sources, which does not appear to be the case for your group. +True, but if you noticed the USC article, they list every title they won by sport. Plus, both the UCLA and USC articles have larger and more detailed athletics sections than the original IWU one. +"::::::: Hi Tom. The problem was after an administrator (not sure if it was you) looked at the book listings, and were happy they were neutral, about two weeks later, user , decided to sabotage the book descriptions, and add on some totally irrelevant, inaccurate and slanderous ad hominem attacks on the book's author, and he inserted them at the beginning of the book descriptions to try and discredit the content with a blatant ad hominem attack. The ad hominem attacks were removed, and then accusations by were manufactured of having an ""edit war"", when he was the one to start trashing the page after it was approved. was also the one to start a destruction campaign against the separate page that the critical links and books were on before. He appears to be very fundamentalist and not too concerned about using propaganda and slander to dissuade people from seeing any critical information. His accusations (beside being ad hominem) were also completely incorrect. Duffer appears not to give a damn about accuracy, or relevance, or the fact that ad hominem and propaganda are not acceptable on Wikepedia. JWs usually refer to this trashing and slander as ""theocratic war strategy"", basically meaning anything goes (including lies and slander) if the end result is to promote the religion. I have removed the ad hominem and I hope it will not return. is also problematic in the same regard, as he appears to not realise when he is using propaganda, (or insults above) but is clear to see it when someone else may use it against him or JWs, demonstrating his interesting double standards (a sad, but typical Watch Tower Society characteristic). Hopefully it is settled now, if Danny and Duffer can get over their very clear insecurities about their faith. Posted Central 7 July 2005 " +" a few suggestions on ""Measuring economic worth over time"" I fully realize that this is a work in progress but thought a few suggestions could be useful. I'll post some specific ones on the talk page but more generally: Please don't take it the wrong way but I think quite often your writing style reflects academia too much - as if you were writing for an academic journal. However the intended target audience of the Wikipedia is different than that of a bunch of academics so care should be taken to avoid unnecessary nomenclature and jargon, as well as to avoid ""academic phrasing"" in favor of simple formulations. More importantly I think one should be careful with introducing terms and concepts into the text that have not been defined previously and that a lay reader may be unfamiliar with, for example ""social cost"" or ""social production"". Speaking of ""social production"" it'd be useful to standardize the terminology when it is being used. For example it seems like by ""proportions of social production"" you refer to income shares of various classes (workers, capitalists, landlords etc) - if so, then that should be stated clearly, if not, the difference should be clarified. Likewise comparing the article title and the lead I think you're equivocating between ""economic worth"" and ""social worth"" which could be/are distinct concepts. Also because I'm probably coming at this from a different background I'm wondering what exactly is the relationship between ""social product"" and more standard measures of production like GDP, income, etc. ""Both contemporary and historical wage price series are inherently controversial, as they speak to the standard of living of working class people."" - I'm not sure if contemporary wage and price series are really ""inherently"" controversial in the sense of being outright rejected by many researchers; at least that doesn't seem like the appropriate word here. Likewise, I don't think the reason why they are controversial/deemed important is because they concern ""working class people"". They obviously concern all members of society whatever their class status. In a similar way the idea of ""economic worth"" can refer to entities such as firms, charities, nations or even physical objects such as machinery and equipment. Proportion of gdp and the questions given as examples aren't really related. For example the question ""what was the opportunity cost of a £50,000 investment in 1840?"" is not obviously or directly related to the question ""what was the social power of capital in 1840?"". Some ideas for expansion: ""Theoretical problems"" sections should link and perhaps briefly mention things like the LTV and marginalism, maybe something like the aggregation problem (though that article needs some serious work). ""Wage price series"" can be expanded to include discussion of how these kind of data are generally collected (btw, I'm not sure what a ""real price"" is here. An individual good price divided by a price index?). For historical wage price series there's also a good bit of data available for the Netherlands and to a lesser extent France and Germany. There's also sporadic data for a wide number of different societies which don't really constitute a series but do provide ""snapshot"" views of the economy/society in time (all the way back to ancient Sumer). The main difficulty of comparing aggregates across time is the changing nature of a consumption basket and time usage, in particular introduction of new goods and disappearance of old ones (like Malleus alludes to above) - this should also be elaborated upon and made more explicit. I'd really hate to barge in and edit a new article while it is still being written so I thought bringing up some suggestions here would be better. Thanks. " +":::::::::The Talk page guidelines state - Behavior that is unacceptable Do not threaten people Now look at this discourse between us - Me - ""So my block is specifically and only because of my removal of the WHOIS tag. Please show me where it states in Wikipolicy that I cannot remove this tag. Bear in mind this tag is not a shared IP notice tag."" You - ""Stop now...and I mean now, or I will have this page protected for the remainder of your block. You have been told repeatedly the rules...you just refuse to understand them because that would make you wrong. You are wrong, you violated policy, you editwarred, you violated WP:3RR, and you were blocked. Now...STOP!"" " +. PLEASE do it. You are powerless without it +Could possibly partially merge with Allophilia... +Featured article candidate ... I also don't like the GR citations, but don't know if they are acceptable or not. Do you know of any U.S. city article that doesn't use general references (2000 U.S. Census Bureau in this case) for their demographics section? Featured articles Boston, Massachusetts and Marshall, Texas even use these. +It's funny how he says that I should reflect on my reputation on Wikipedia when he should reflect on his reputation as an administrator. +Finite State Machine Logic.svg +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Village People, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. juicetalk " +" However, Starcade, I think the most productive thing you can do right now is tasking yourself with finding a reliable source that back up the edits you're trying to make. We have a policy, which can be seen at WP:BURDEN, that says The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. You may remove any material lacking a reliable source that directly supports it. Wikipedia requires that things be proven with reliable sources. If you can find a reliable source that backs up your information, that will solve all of this and would most likely allow the inclusion of the information in the article. I think that should be your top priority regarding the article. Thank you. - Ghost Second half, Sudoghost: I had done so beforehand. I guess I should back up and explain the whole thing. The dispute is about the scheduling of matches on Wrestlemania XXVIII. The original list had one match, The Rock vs. John Cena, which was agreed to in a promo the Monday after Wrestlemania XXVII, the first time such a thing had been done that far in advance. Fast forward to July 17, 2011, where Daniel Bryan, largely seen as a too-small wrestler with no personality in a federation trying to distance itself from ""wrestling"", won the Smackdown Money in the Bank Ladder Match. This won him, in storyline, the unilateral right to a WWE World Heavyweight Championship match at any point over the next year. Last Friday (aired it actually was taped on Tuesday), he announced that he would cash in that title opportunity at Wrestlemania XXVIII. http://www.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/2011-07-22/results was the source I used. WWE also has an interview up with Bryan now which was not up when I made the edit. My issue is that, since the Money in the Bank winner can choose to cash his briefcase any time, he had chosen to do so at Mania XXVIII and at that moment, became a scheduled match for WrestleMania XXVIII. Ruth is using the Mr. Kennedy situation to claim that match probably will not take place (Kennedy (now Mr. Anderson, a previous MitB winner, wanted to do the same thing (cash at Wrestlemania), but was quickly unseated by Edge, cancelling that match). The problem with this is two-fold: One, it presumes (WP:Crystal, again!) that Bryan will, because he is not seen favorably by Vince McMahon (nor by many WWE marks), lose not only his briefcase but his real-life place on the WWE roster by Mania XXVIII. Two, if me putting that match up is WP:Crystal, then so, at this early date, is Rock-Cena. Ruth claims she has WWE travel packages which have already advertised Rock-Cena for Mania XXVIII, but has consistently refused to reference them. She claims exactly what JaC stated above as sufficient to not only keep Rock-Cena, but remove Bryan from the card AND silence me from saying otherwise! So I went to the WP:Crystal page and applied the relevant clause. Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. The event, by the WWE Universe, is notable (it's a Smackdown main event for the largest card of the year for the company), is at least as certain to take place (at the moment) as Rock-Cena (and if that fact changes, we can change the Mania XXVIII page when it does), and the documentation is on WWE's own website, which I provided you. I believe Ruth is a typical WWE mark, like this other *mumblemumblemumble* up here, and believes that Daniel Bryan is not worthy of even a WWE contract. I believe her stand is prejudicial, selective, and wrong. Good faith went out the door about 15 posts ago. And I do NOT believe in consensus if the consensus is demonstratably wrong! " +" 2012 Fascism My name is Raymond Mardyks and I have valuable contributions regarding this topic. The ""galactic alignment"" was originally my research, for example, and now presented in a sloppy second generation, simplistic misleading version. I understand the Maya calendar and it's implications for 2012. How can we proceed? Wiki does not come close to presenting the facts yet. earthlove2013@gmail.com" +Everybody calls him A-Roid or A-Fraud, cause that's what he is. Even MSNBC called him A-Roid . This should be in the article. +" List is far too good to break up so I have moved it to it's own List of further reading on narcissistic personality disorder an approach that has worked well on other articles swamped by their reading lists. Link added to ""see also"" " +I LOVE BRISTOL PALIN. SHE IS THE GOING TO BE SUCH A MILF! +I learned so much thank to you I love Alanis and her work since her first song. I'd like to thank everybody who wrote this because it's really well done. I would have helped if it was no so complete... I will try anyway... Maryjane +All are welcome to join in ) +" Yeah, just saw that Less got him. Sorry I was afk. — ¿? ✍ " +Article is too long I just removed a lot of non-Muhammad pictures. The text too is bloated and unnecessary. The article does not have to talk in length about everything - thats why we have the sub-article links. This is like having 10 articles on one page. It should be trimmed. (talk•contribs) +" ""questionable visible modifications"" Do you even know what RAM AIR is? It is becoming apparent that your knowledge of Mustangs and Mustang related equipment is rather limited. I am puzzled as to why someone who has only been involved with this article for such a short time feels that he can come here and dictate the content of the article." +" Your block to the ""Rachael Ray"" editor UGH! How dare you block the sacred one who willingly and justly defames Rachael Ray. I have met Rachael Ray and she is the dark one! You must reconsider your horrid actions or the syncrogryph of the fifth apocryphal will reign down upon your hairs with the might of 1000 horses!" +re: Your rename request on the English Wikipedia Hello WJBscribe,I apologise the late answer. I was busy working. However, thank You for Your notification about my rename request on my German talk page. Since I do not need this account that urgently and due to bug 13507, I no longer want my account to get renamed.Thank You for Your efforts and help concerning this request. I appreciate it. – Have a nice weekend! Best regards o), +Image requested|people of Kansas|American football people}} {{ +I'll help you to put up some serious human rights violations in Australia. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Killing Floor (2009 video game). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. clamation point " +":::: There should be some priomordial quality mandate. Wikipedia should want quality verifiable references. If [WP:VER] is intended to be weaponized then a bot could be made that deletes pages and sections based on whether the section contains an insufficiently prestigious reference. Treating WP:VER as an intentional algorithm would allow an attacker to delete perhaps as high as 90% of wikipedia without even needing to look at the content. No one could invoke any objection to the mass deletion if the literal interpretation of WP:VER is the most important rule on wikipedia. Vandalism becomes impossible if criteria for removal applied to a science page can be robotically applied to a philosophy page. The above attack would meet a common sense interpretation of vandalism. The only possible protection from the mass deletion attack is if [WP:VAN] is considered to have higher priority for literal interpretation than WP:VER. There should already be a common sense acceptance that Vandalism is more dangerous and objectively assessed than the quality of referenced material, and as shown above, rejecting the statement binds wikipedia to a suicide pact. Its my view that the recent deletions are indistinguishable from robotic vandalism and they deleted high quality and verifiable references based only on the content hosting platform. If Vandalism and Verifiability are to be equally considered in actions, then restoring the content and tagging it as needing better sources should be done. Also if there is to be a defense from robotic deletion of the majority of wikipedia, then ""deletors"" that have shown no previous contribution to the page should be treated more suspiciously than those who have helped build it. " +okay i see. you accused me of being one of them! +" in Number Hi Arthur, I see in Number you have changed my additions of to with the edit summary that ""consensus seems to be that fractions are [used in this manner] in math articles"". I am more than happy to accept that; I changed them as part of the GA review because there was not specifically anything on the talk page to indicate this consensus, so defaulted to MoS. Could you please point me to the consensus of which you speak? I have no doubt you are right; I myself was a little surprised that this had not come up before. A comment about the consensus at the GA review would be very handy, and I am more than happy to accept it. Incidentally I've raised the subject at Wikipedia Talk:Manual of style (dates and numbers) as it seems to me that all it says is to put fractions in ""fractional form"" without defining what that is, and even in the section WP:MOSNUM#Fractions only says what to do about common fractions, which leaves us high and dry dealing with other fractions – for myself I would not regard as a common fraction, for example. Thanks for all your hard work here and everywhere (at least one editor notices it). " +What about use in other langueges? What about use in other langueges, i.e. in Chinese? +" You *ARE* indeed clueless. Yes, ""Ariana"" is a different spelling for ""Aryana"" which does indeed come from the Avestan's ""Aryanem Vaejo"" (specifically, in Vandidad, Fargasht-e Yekom). But the ""Aria"" that you mention above is Greek for what is in Old Persian ""Haraiva"" which is modern Herat (Hari-Rud). Looks like you can't even read and understand a simple text in front of you. The Greek ""Aria"" has NOTHING TO DO with ""Arianem Vaejo"". Not even a single scholar has ever suggested that Arianem Vaejo is the same as ""Haraivo or the Greek ""Aria"". The Greek ""Aria"" for Avestan/Old Persian ""Haraivo"" is comparable to how in ancient greek text Hagmatana is written ""Ekbatana"" or many other examples. The Old Persian satapry Hari-Rud (which was not called Hari-Rud in Old Persian) is clearly mentioned in both Darius I's Behistun Inscription as well as two of Xerxes' inscriptions. ""Arianem Vaejo"" on the other hand, is mentioned in the Avesta where I told you above, and numerous scholars have published works on the whereabouts of it (including our own late Dr. Bahram Farahvashi who has a full book by that title, called ""Iran Vij""). Nobody (other than our great scholar ""Zereshk"" of course) thinks it is the same as Hari-Rud/Haraivo/greek ""Aria"". As for ""aberoo"", I honestly feel sad for you, because your beahviour and edits in Wikipedia clearly reveal that you suffer from an inferiority complex and nearly all your edits are about image and not about contents. It is obvious that you try to present an image instead of contributing to contents. I suspect this has to do with the fact that you live in USA (according to your user page) and they have probably called you a camel rider or something along those lines, so this has resulted in the sort of pathetic behaviour that we observe from you here. " +" Lightening In the ""Statistics"" section, some added a comment that the building gets struck by lightening 5000 times per year. That is clearly incorrect. An earlier revision stated 300 to 500 times per year, but provided no citation. I deleted the entire line. If someone can find the true data for that stat, please add it back in." +Reversion Seat > See Reverted change of See to Seat: bishops properly do have a See ~ • Talk + new +Blocked== I have been blocked for responding to KimDabelsteinPetersen's ongoing assaults on Global Warming skeptic articles: Exposing your arguments as being specious and hypocritical is entirely relevant to stopping the BLP violating assaults that you and Connolley and others in your cabal have carried out. If you're serious about the sourcing standards that you're arguing for, then please apply them equally to all articles in this topic instead of gunning for subjects that you disagree with. You behavior is entirely inappropriate and enormously damaging to Wikipedia. The issue was the repeated removal of large sections of sourced content, reverted by several editors. The deletion included removal a statement that Lawrence Solomon is a columnist for the National Post. I have no idea why Stephan Shulz, Dabelstein, and Will Connolley have been allowed to continue their POV pushing rampage and are free to continue their efforts to disparage those they disagree with by the smearing them in their biographies. I have no objection to the inclusion of properly sourced criticism, but their use of innuendo, and specious arguments for gutting content and coattracking smears is unacceptable. It is very ironic that at a time when a deletion rampage against unreferenced biographies is going on these editors and their admin allies are allowed to violate our core principles and continue to abuse wikipedia for propaganda purposes. I would also note that I was given no warning and no opportunity to amend my comment, if in fact there is soemthign objectionable in it. If someone felt it was inappropriate I would be happy to address that. But once again we have tool abuse by incompetent and dishonest admins who see themselves as being above the rules. It's grotesque. == +Back again! Hey I'm back. Gonna vandalize all day and no one can stop me! As you can tell I can't be stopped by banning. I'll be seeing alo tof you and the rest of the blacklisted admins for the next couple of weeks =P 70.149.218.192 Dougbiznatch! +Huggle 3 Hey Deathlaser! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must: Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or . Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you +Yes, the article is great now, i'll change my vote. What a coincidence, I just finnished reading the article. 23:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) +" dude. you're generation X and you watch buffy the vampire slayer. you must be a real hit with the ladies. and sinneed, you're only helping my cause of proving you ""editors"" are nothing more than popularity contest judges. so thanks!" +You are a EXCLUSIONIST! I AM A INCLUSIONIST! SHAME ON YOU! +Thank you very much for the kind welcome. I've been reading Wikipedia as an unregistered user for a couple of years. At first I was a bit of an 'Encyclopedia snob'; over time, I've come to appreciate Wikipedia as a useful and enjoyable resource. I've been lurking as a registered user for a little bit, and after trying my hand at some small edits, felt it was time to contribute a bit more. I very much appreciate the references you provided. I'll read them as a first step in my education here. I'll also continue to look at existing pages for inspiration and example. Your user page is certainly impressive to me - I'll be sure to use it, and other such pages, as inspiration when I update mine in the future. Kindest regards, +It now reads like a fan magazine. Cut down on the trivia please. +Hi alsion could you please explain the nessage you left ? +Yes, indeed, there is an indent in the northern portion of Wyoming. It suprised me when I saw it, but I looked it up in an atlas, and yesm there is an indentation. +" Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet Suggest merging Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet here. No evidence that he meets WP:POLITICIAN or any other part of WP:BIO, or the WP:GNG. His claim to notability is having been chief justice of Bengal, and it may be that more sources can be found to establish his notability, but so far there is no evidence of the required significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. (talk) • (contribs) " +—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . If the template {{reqphoto}} is inserted into the appropriate talk page, the request for a photo gains a wider audience and the odds of success improve somewhat, although the Wikipedia:Wikiproject Woodworking tends to look after its own and respond appropriately. Now there's challenge. -) —  (talk) +" Well, totaly diferent is that the term as it uses the name macedonia within it refers to Macedonian (as you want) political influence, and there is no need for a ""google site"", it refers to something macedonian, and implicating bulgarian POV makes the statements in the artical unrelevant, but if you want so, continue to do it, cose I give up, you have google here to be the smartest, congratulations. (not everithing is written ""on"" internet). 00:00,14 June 2006 (UTC)" +create an account. +This message is regarding the page Christopher murt. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. t • @ +Explosion section I would suggest moving some of the information in the Explosion section pertaining to being on the FBI's 10 most wanted list and avoiding arrest for 10 years to the Arrest section. The way it is now, breaks the flow of the information about the townhouse. This will also add some additional information to your Arrest section. +":::: To User:Sennen goroshi: Well, you could have at least used terms such as bullcrap, horsecrap, cowcrap, or any other less offending words than ""bulls**t"", whatever the lame drama you witnessed. And you just said ""a single f**king word""...Do you feel like a grown man when you use that kind of language? There could be some children refering to Wikipedia for his/her homework, and I don't want them to learn foul languages here. I do not know what this ""wikilawyering"" that I have supposed to be doing according to you. I only could find that it is a pejorative term. Could you explain to me, an ignorant user who is new to Wikipedia, that exactly what behavior of mine is ""wikilawyering""? Why do you have to say things like ""just to shut you up"", or ""you would waste so much of the other editors' time""? You are hurting my feelings. It is uncalled for. I am a delicate, sensitive guy -_-. ""Wikipedia articles are made by editors gaining consensus - this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"". - Have a look at the policy: Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. You say ""this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"", but notice that I am the one who officially started a consensus-gathering effort at , and you have not even participated in it. Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars! What a valuable piece of information that I have not noticed. So what? I don't see this discussion included in that category. By saying that, you are not offending every editors who participated in and worked hard for this discussion, are you? " +Now I am really confused. My edit was so egregious as to be redacted? It was reported in a reliable source. I guess I am confused as to what I've done wrong. Blue's harassment of Burch and Alter would seem to be notable in this instance, especially since the harassment is against wikipedia editors. My edits were done in good faith - if they are against policy I'll accept that, but I'd like to know what policy I am violating. Thank you for your civility though, as a new(ish) editor, it is very much appreciated. +Ancient Greek sites in Serbia Hi! I have two questions about Niš and Lebane. Regards, +Maybe, just maybe you should be looking at the language and methods of others instead of picking on a newbie. +Oh shut up Bong, your deleting for your fun god damnit +" Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Tibia (computer game). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Questions or Comments?) " +I don't know about the redundancy that you mentioned, but this article certainly could be more accessible, and if you can accomplish that aspect, that would be fantastic. It's always seemed to me that the Physics and Mathematics articles are orientated too much towards experts, and other subjects (say Philosophy, History or Politics) that I don't profess to know a great deal about, seem to be easily accessible to me, so much so in fact, that a lot of what forms my philosophical and political beliefs has stemmed from using Wikipedia as a first point of call. I would almost certainly recommend Wikipedia for someone wanting to learn about such subjects, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend it for physics or maths articles at the moment, especially maths heavy articles like this. +" RE: Apology, No worries I hope you didn't read my comment as rude, I certainly did not intend it as such, but simply a quick explanation for why I had removed your template, and reverted your changes. It is just that when an editor who has been established for many years finds a template threatening to block them on their page, it is not likely to get a good response. If my response was harsh, I apologize, but you should always check to see who you are templating if they are not an IP, and if they are established, it is always best to simply leave a note requesting more information, rather than a harsh template. I hope you understand, and no worries. Ariel♥Gold " +Is there a way to have a solid, progressive discussion concerning this article and once and for all get it resolved? +" Hello there Peter, I don't tend watch other users talk pages since my watchlist is already quite stuffed, and because some talk pages receive a lot of (Non to related) traffic that would cause the page to pop up. Just a note for the PS: section - there are multiple ways to post reactions to multiple people. Personally i prefer to copy-n-paste the entire section back and forth between pages, since that assures that the conversation is always up to date and readable for everyone (Whereas only placing responses on other people's talk pages would lead to a fragmented conversation. Other editors prefer other methods - some just post a reply on every involved parties talk page. Alternatively you can place the Talkback template on another users page to notify them that you left a response for them on your own page (Which is convenient in its own rights, since you can keep the entire conversation on a single page). All methods are really fine - in the end it is just a means to make sure that another editor managed to find your reply. ) (Contact me,Contribs) " +Warnings from administrators can be listed on the bottom of the case page of the closed arbitration, along with blocks, bans, or restrictions, so that the admins on arbitration enforcement can keep track. Regards, +...it doesn't really change anything/make a difference if NHN is a sockpuppetesque rather than meatpuppetesque. +Hi Sukh I've compacted the section to a appropriate size. +I'm still in the process of perfecting this page. I'll be adding footnotes tomorrow. +No. The IP address is different, dude. It's not that hard to believe that several different people just don't agree with your method of how to do the table. And it doesn't matter what Survivor Wikia does, because this is Wikipedia. Your way of doing it just doesn't look right to people. I'm looking at it right now and it just looks off. It's not necessary to make the Dome progress in the order of when they're permanently eliminated. The Dome progress shows when they were eliminated in the Dome. We have the Ex-ile progress table to tell us when they were permanently eliminated. I don't understand why you're the only one who is deciding how it should be done. It's starting to look like you don't want to accept anyone else's opinion, but your own. +" Gibraltar self-government Dear Justin, I can't understand why you delete my edits on the Gibraltar article and then post the following comment in my page: ""You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gibraltar."" I have not intended to start an edit war, just eliminated a reference that seems controversial and was not supported by any reference (1) and repositioned some uncontroverted facts (2): 1) The article began with the expression ""Gibraltar (...) is a self-governing British overseas territory (...)"". This was not supported by any objective reference in the article and, in fact, it is something not endorsed by the UN (see below), which at least provides some ground for not accepting the self-government of Gibraltar as a self-evident fact. Therefore, I substituted it for some referenced facts. 2) The article referenced the fact that Gibraltar is on the UN's non self-governing territories list but British and Gibraltarian polititians think that it should be removed. Only it was lost somewhere in the middle of this (long) article. I repositioned this information to the introduction of the article where it summarises the territory's political nature. It does not matter if 50 years ago it was the UK who nominated Gibraltar for the list: this status is reviewed every year and has not yet been reverted by UN's Special Committee. What surprises me is: I would have expected that if you disagree with my edits, you would discuss them or, if you think they do not offer a holistic view, you complete them with additional referenced facts. Instead of that, you just deleted the edits and accused me of edit warring. I will appreciate your discussing the changes and contributing with additional insight and referenced facts. Please do not merely undo my edits. Kind regards. If you want to discuss this the appropriate place is the talk page of the article, not here as this is not a matter between you and justin. The reality is that since the 2006 constitution Gibraltar is manifestly self governing, sadly progress on delisting it by the UN C24 is hampered by Spain's foolish attitude and intransigence. It is amusing that that committee is comprised of representatives of states with less democracy than Gibraltar and if you follow the proceedings they have been singularly useless in achieving anything in relation to their remit on ANY territory such that the GoG declined to attend further meetings. In relation to the politics of Gibralar, which is what the article is about, the UN is irrelevent - indeed the committee has not even visited the territory in question despite being invited to do so by the GoG and the UK. They are not so much a paper tiger as a limp piece of used bog roll. Please do not insult my intelligence that your intentions were anything other than to push a POV with that edit. The facts remain that Gibraltar is self-governing. It is only Spain that for its own political agenda denies this and the UN C24 is discussed in the article. Your POV edit sought to give those facts WP:UNDUE prominence. Your behaviour was also to edit war to keep that edit, hence my warning was appropriate. And as Gibnews points out the correct place for that discussion was the article talk page. '''' talk " +There's a thorough analysis here but it's way too complicated for this article. The figure in Geert-Jan van Oldenborgh's article a few years ago would be good because it gives the cycle length in years, which I think is what we want for a layman-oriented article. +Two weeks Even though I was unable to post for two week, please don't think I missed those posts where you blamed me for your failure to post an obvious story in a timely manner. Whether you're prepared to repeat them now remains to be seen. I continued to browse in that time, noticing the lack of consequences for HiLo despite him repeatedly misquoting you, or the lack of actoin against anyone who simply continued to do what others at ANI correctly recognised as basic trolling rather than informed opposition. I also noticed that the only people who complained about the story once it went up, were the same people who you claimed all had valid points to make in opposing it. Points that didn't refer to a single source, and in many cases, showed complete and utter ignorance of the entire sport/country they were commenting on. Given how close you characterised the debate as being, that's very odd, don't you think? Still, all my fault eh. Mind, not editting for two weeks at least meant I could fully take in the continued coverage the story got, which you may or may not have noticed, wasn't even overshadowed by David Beckham's own retirement news a week later. +" La Presse? La Press is listed with the Globe and Mail as one of Canada's ""newspapers of record"". To my knowledge La Presse is more of a regional Quebec based french-language newspaper, with only limited reach and/or influence outside of Quebec? Perhaps it is a provincial ""newspaper of record"" but it seems misleading for it to be on the list. " +Jannat 2 reviews I've managed to get the user who was inserting quotations from dozens of reviews into Jannat 2 to talk on the article talk page. We're trying to come to a consensus as to what exactly to include in reviews. It's certainly true that we need more than what is currently in the article, but less than Josephjames.me was adding. As one of the previous reverters, could you please join the discussion at Talk:Jannat 2#Problems with copied verison, and help us figure out what and how much to include? +Adoption Hell Suncatcher 13! I wanted to get back to you about adoption. Unfortunately, my work and school schedule does not allow me to spend as much time editing as I would like. I don't think I can really make a commitment to an adoptee. I don't want to go halfway and then quit because of my schedule. I am very sorry to turn you down. If you need any help with questions here and there, I am happy to answer them and should be able to do that in a timely manner. I just don't think I can sign up for a full adoption program. Again, I apologize. I hope to see your edits soon! Cheers! +Thank you for experimenting with the page February 7 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. +" i am prepared to recognise that the 'outpsyjah' article, spelt with a lowercase ""o"", is not yet fit to be published; more work is needed. though, it is music and with further informtion may then be considered as an appropriate encyclopedic subject" +The quote is a quote. Sources relay this quote to show the impact and response from the community ( which the sources indicate that Zubeidi was a prominent member of). When one of the notable terrorist / resistance groups go out of their way to endorse the donation of organs to Israelis that is certainly something which deserves mention in our article. +What a good laugh... +None of that matters. See Licensing Act of 1737. See the talk page. It's time to run WHOIS and go squish some IP editor. +" ""How could it not be?"" This is an opinion. Frankly, some who are disfellowshipped are relieved, and some have already been ""gone"" so long it doesn't matter what action the elders take a point I would have thought you would jump on. But then again, you are only hearing from those that do have a problem with their experiences. The scholarly back-up of doctrines is a separate issue, and really has no bearing on whether Witnesses believe something or not. After all, we believe that humans were created roughly 6,000 years ago, and a good number of scientists and anthropologists would hotly debate that in a New York minute (before the transit strike). The point is, the article is to present what Witnesses as a group believe, and what criticisms exist, and the extent of this criticism. There is a threshold as to what divergence is notable and worth mentioning, and how extensive coverage of it should be, and your views simply do not represent the percentage you seem to think or hope for. You said, ""Maybe you should write to them ... and see what they say."" You are the one who seems to want/need the answer to this, so perhaps you should write to them yourself. Watch Tower, 25 Columbia Heights, Brooklyn, NY 11201-2483 USA - " +You're welcome and it is kind of you to say so. +"The examples comparing ""Conventional, sequential paradigm"" and ""Parallel SIMD paradigm, packed registers (SWAR)"" are not contrasting at all. The only difference is syntax. It's so silly it looks sinply wrong, not just misleading. " +Nature of the holdings in Mimms and Miller/“Police” vs. “peace officer” In carefully reviewing these cases, I cannot find support for the language I used several years ago, so I’ve revised it to strictly reflect what the Court actually said. Although the Court did not expressly require that a peace officer cite particularized concern for his safety, they did not expressly say that it was unnecessary, either. The clarification of “federal law” is also important, because the Supreme Court, empowered under Article III of the US Constitution, cannot really grant “authority” to a peace officer; rather, they are limited to interpretation of laws and review for conformance with the Constitution, as they make quite clear in the citation from Mimms. I’ve added a tag to the assertion that state law may not allow drivers or passengers to be ordered to exit the vehicle; though this assertion may be correct, it’s pretty sweeping, and needs support. It may be particularly significant in light of the Death of Sandra Bland. Many pundits have insisted that Ms. Bland’s failure to exit her car when so ordered provided cause for arrest, usually citing Mimms and Miller, and perhaps Texas Transportation Code §542.501. The Supreme Court holdings were of course limited to the Fourth Amendment, and did not (and could not) consider whether refusal to exit a vehicle after being so ordered violated state law; unless the Commerce Clause of Article I is somehow involved (and this seems unlikely), that would be a matter for state legislators to regulate, and state courts to interpret. Some states well may have done so; however, I have been unable to find anything close to dispositive, and have not seen anyone else do so. I am not going to make a project of running this down, but if someone else can provide this information, it would seem a great addition. Hopefully, any such reference would cite real decisional law that is unambiguous to the average reader, rather than a mere assertion by a third party (if the third party cannot cite authority, that party’s assertion is suspect). “Police” vs. “peace officer” I do not understand the suggestion that “peace officer” or “law enforcement officer” is strictly the proper term needs support; I think the linked WP article makes it quite clear that either of these terms—which refer to a superset of “police officer”—are the strictly correct usage. I used “police” simply because in some other articles, other editors—usually IP—kept changing it to “police officer,” and the bickering seemed a poor use of time. And I reasoned that if the Supreme Court can use “police”—correctly or otherwise—we cannot be faulted for doing so here. Whoever added that tag did not give a reason; absent some good reason to keep it (or perhaps a suggested rewording of the note), I’m inclined to remove the tag. +An appology is in order Dear Colin, I am not sure if you will have the chance to read this, or if you'll have a moment to respond, but I am a student in the University of Toronto and specifically one of the 1700 psychology students mentioned in the article. However before I go any further, may I express my most sincere and deepest appologies to you and everyone involved. I will not try to make excuses for my actions, nor will I try to do so for my fellow students as I do not speek for them. I realise (and no doubt others will too) that what we left behind was unbecoming of a sutdent at U of T. And most importantly, I realise that we did as future scholars was wrong. I know that you and you colleagues are considering taking extreme measures to ensure the content of Wikipedia stays secure as a responce to our actions. Though I can understand where you are coming from, I do not believe that this will solve any of your problems and will only make things worse in the long-run. I see this situation as a systemic error on both of our sides, but as a first year student I have very little educational and social clout to enforce my statement. I am asking as both an avid reader of Wikipedia and as a lover of knowledge, please do not black-out our privaleges to use and edit articles. Let us both use this experience as a steping stone to learn how to go about doing this in a constructive manner benefits Wikipedia and my school. Looking to make this a better place, CivCodex +"::This is not a forum to discuss the Dragon Skin. Please keep your comments relevant to the development of the article. SWATJester Son of the Defender " +Re:WestVirginia-geo-stub yes, most places have the flags for the geo-stubs for consistency. I must admit with US states, it doesn't make them that easy to tell apart, since most of them are just blue with a coat of arms. Another option is to use a small outline map, like, say (WV's a pretty distinctive shape). Trouble is, unless a landscape is very distinctive, at that size one river looks a lot like another river (some of the NZ scenery pictures I've uploaded don't look that dissimilar when shrunk that small - the icon you had could just as easily have been my Image:Rangitikei.jpg). Unless the scenery is as distinctive as, say Mt Rushmore or Monument Valley, it'll just look like a generic landscape at that size. And if you make the images larger, they start to become too conspicuous in the article. +Please accept this To repair any pain that may have been caused you ]]== +Page is done and up - enjoy 209.212.28.50 +" Temporary massive removal of some legendary history There were quite a few paragraphs discussing the ancient origins of the Yadavs, but as I was picking my way through it, it appeared a well-nigh impenetrable mass of confusing data, and likely a lot of WP:Synthesis. Terms such as Yadava/Yadav, Ahir/Yadav, and Abhira/Ahir were frequently conflated, and it appeared at many (most?) times that info was included without regard for whether the cited author gave any indication that his topic involved the modern Yadav caste. The info is not ""lost"", it is cleanly preserved in the History tab, and its removal noted in Edit Summary and here so that any inclined editor can go back through it and carefully select the appropriate portions to re-incorporate. I submit that any info not specifically related to the modern Yadav go into the appropriate other articles such as Yadava and Abhira, etc. and that only material clearly linking the modern Yadavs to those ancient roots be included here. Otherwise, lengthy explanations of past groups with no clear link to the present group constitutes Synthesis, as it implies/pre-supposes a factual linkage when one may not be specified. Again, I'm not trying to permanently wipe out this info, I just think the section was very unwieldy and contentious, and rather than pick and chip at it, it's better to temporarily wipe the slate clean, and then mine the past drafts to incorporate any usable data. " +" You are again getting me wrong. I just want all the facts to be represented. Anyway I am about to get banned from this topic very soon, so will make my points quickly. There are no Kshatriyas in the world as far as Nambuthiris are concerned. The so called ""Kshatriyas"" and ""Samantans"" which you find in Malabar and among Malabari immigrants to South Kerala, are Nairs who got elevated in caste system. As I have added many sources here, stating that all the Kshatriyas of Kerala are of Nayar origin. I just want to mention that. If you claim that they are not of Nair origin, then please tell me who they are. " +April 2014 (UTC) Mainly problem in it, that one administrator revenge me (1, 2, 3 - In it time i no ever blocked and this is his stupid answer) and nobody it no interest - section of Zbečník Protect stream. Plainly this admin can behave badly and nobody with it no do, his bad behavior and it, that others him does not solve is mainly reason thereto that i lost respect to here admins, because i was blocked every (regardless on my edits, if edits was good or bad). And request to unblock → for admins better tell lies and talk that account was hacked, therefore i not have chance to unblock. 11:41, 29 +Thank you. Now you can't edit the article without clearance from this talk page. This also means that I don't need to provide any further evidence on the COI noticeboard. +" Canada list why was it deleted in the first place? it's encyclopedic. if it's not, then delete the ""list of stations in the United States that broadcast on channel 6"", too. " +Ok, so I need to find an online article that features her name in it? Do I put the article up on there? Lastly, when you google Nikki Jane does anything on your computer come up about her being on the Noah's Arc: Jumping the Broom (soundtrack)? +THANKS The rewrite is just fine. Thanks for your help. +Polite to leave link to Larkin with Toads article Despite the efforts of the anti-Larkin 25 lobby to take down Larkin with Toads, it would be polite (and good faith) to leave the wikilink to Larkin with Toads in the Larkin 25 article. It is still a viable article in its own right and a national art event discussed in the national media so it should not be deleted. It's a keep (as is Larkin 25). +Idoit you're a bloody moron. 122.57.32.65 +Unspecified source for Image:JC_Tremblay_-_WHA.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:JC_Tremblay_-_WHA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. +" Thanks for the pointers, I have a pretty good idea about what foot/walking messengers as I am a walker myself do and Buffalo Bill's removal of my addition was just wrong the article is as much about the transportation related occupation ""messenger"" as it is about bicycling and I really do believe that Bill's removal was wrong, how can I report him?" +I don't know but they need a current pic. +" Ok, It seems we all agree to move this article to ""House of Barcelona"". What Enric Naval does with ""House of Aragon"" will belong to other talk page. So if nobody does it, tomorrow i will rename this article.(if i can because an article ""House of Barcelona"" already exists now, and i am not expert on Wikipedia. i hope not to find any problem.) " +Jammer (rapper) Hi, I saw you salted this title a couple of years ago. I'd like to have it unprotected in light of the following media coverage: , , , , , . It's no trouble to establish his notability now that he's released a full-length album, as these reviews should show. +Dear 24, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreiate contributions, but to write nonsense and test editing i suggest the use of Wikipedia:Sandbox. Cheers, 18:20, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC) +It's far from a default keep. Your message is incredibly premature. Even if you disagree with me, I'm disappointing you seek to circumvent the process so early in it. +" Time to archive? At 50KB (not including this new section), I was thinking we should probably archive this talk page and start afresh. WP:ARCHIVE suggests a consensus, so here it is. Yay or nay? (t • c) Good article Some of the boxes above list Twitter as a ""Start class"" article. Personally I think it's far beyond that. In the Peer review, said that making Twitter a Good article would ""certainly be possible and desirable"". That in mind, should we list Twitter as a Good Article candidate? Also, does anyone think we've missed the Good article criteria and need to do some specific tasks before nominating? (t • c) " +La coupole I reformatted the references of La Coupole as you kindly requested. +" Gollum Would you care to join the discussion about which version of English to use at Talk:Gollum. Cheers (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) " +Hi, I'm a gay ass guy name Nawlin and I'm a dicklicker that likes to delete stuff he has no business deleting. I really need to get laid. +Re your message: That won't work. You can't use the existence of the Wikipedia article to establish the phrase's notability. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Richfield, Utah. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +No. I agree with BenBuff91 statement. The AFDI hate group status is relevant to the story. +Support Based on what PatGallacher asserts, I can buy that more people are looking for a three-season TV series than for a just-launched comic strip or a TV episode, which are the only other uses with dedicated articles right now (and none of the other uses appear to be contenders, either). +" My bad, I've reverted myself, though at the time I don't have time go back and check but I'm pretty sure they've said they're working off the TV series, but until I can go and check its fine to leave the books in. (t) " +(I'll have another look at your discussion page in a day or two if you wish to leave me a message) +" I think that Eric Corbett has been unfairly scapegoated to the extent that he has become an unwitting symbol of these kinds of problems on the encyclopedia. But he and many members of his ""fan club"" are largely to blame for this (though you are not one of them, to my knowledge), as they are the ones loudly obstructing attempts to deal with the problems not caused by Corbett, and a number of them harass anyone who even suggests that Corbett be held accountable for what he has actually done. (talk) " +Kollias is a questionable source that is a pseudo historian.He is used when when referring to pseudohistorical matters regarding himself and the fantasies he wrote about. +" Homeopathy The reference to the term ""Homöopathie"" being first published in 1807 is on page 263 of the Dean article (page 9 of the pdf), although his referencing is a little convoluted - it cites an article called ""Fingerzeige auf den homöopathischen Gebrauch der Arzneien in der bisherigen Praxis"", referring to ref. 52 which itself refers back to ref. 24 which has it published in Hufeland’s Journal, xxvi (1807), 5–43. I'll reword the ""Hahnemann's concept"" section to include Hahnemann's use of the term ""doctrine of specifics"" and reference Dudgeon. I've noticed there's a short ""to do"" list on the Homeopathy talk page which I might try to work on now that things have quietened down over there. Do you know of any good but reasonably concise sources (preferably available online) for: i) the concept of healing crisis in the context of homeopathy; ii) the work of Constantine Hering and James Tyler Kent and how it differs from Hahnemann? Wikipedia's Kent article cites your article ""Kent's Influence on British Homeopathy"" but any additional sources would be gratefully received. All the best, " +" Of course. I'll remove it now. It just looked suspicious because you did not explain why you were removing it (you can do so using an edit summary). Sorry if the generic warning I posted (saves time, etc., etc., especially when dealing with loads of bad faith additions when recent change patrolling) seemed a bit harsh. Hope you stick around ). Best, ✈ " +, 29 February 2012 (UTC) I just saw that Only Girl is a good article and uses word-digits instead of numbers. Also most other Wikipedia articles I have seen use the word method too. 18:52 +Fred, shut up you sad old twat, no one is interested in 'i think i'm fucking god' wiki moderators. get a real job you sad little man... +Help Plz Help in Restoring Barelwi Article which is becoming Vitim of some Biased users. also i got this message that Shabiha must be thrown out on the discusion page of Barelwi [] y Abureem. Plz help. (t • c) +" The difference between a first serialization and a reprint The difference is that there's a difference. It is as simple as anything to say that the relevant stories were published as first serializations in such and such a periodical on such and such a date. Badabing, badaboom, done. And that's how to put it accurately. Specific words for specific rights mean specific things in any kind of intellectual property field. In writing, if I have ""first serialization"" rights and I publish a ""reprint"" without owning the rights to ""reprint"" or having permission from the entity that does own the rights to ""reprint,"" I'm up a creek. If I, as an author, sell my story as ""first serialization"" rights to a magazine (customarily, it would be something more limited like first serialization rights for North America), then I retain all other kinds of ""first"" rights to my story. The distinction wouldn't matter if we were talking about Wolfowitz's or someone else's personal blog where they referred to whatever as a ""reprint."" That would be oh, whatever, he didn't know the difference and just used the wrong word. Contracts for stories or books are real specific about exactly what rights are going to be owned by who, and under what conditions and for how long. That specificity is why the terminology matters. This is not Wolfowitz's personal blog. This is an encyclopedia. In a personal blog, the distinction between ""first serialization"" and ""reprint"" don't matter. In an encyclopedia, it does. " +Yeah, I saw that it's in Suc. county when reading about Battle of Baia, but I thought it started somewhere in Transylvania and ended in Suceava. That's on the list of correction - for the next update. +Actually, my name is Tony Riley. Contact me at roofingag@gmail.com or blow me you Nazi. You're not qualified for your self-appointed role. BenBen? DickDick more like. +" Then again, why waste DRV's time when it can be dealt with on the talk page. — talk " +March 2015 (UTC) I agree completely with Gudzwabofer. We cannot let drug companies take over the planet, Jytdog, and you, Jytdog, are obviously attempting to make people fall for allopathy. 13:38, 22 +Unfairly blocked as Mattythewhite got the hump as Boerrigter signed for Celtic and I provided a source. Would like another person to review this situation please as this administrator is evidently incapable of having a life. +Map key is bullshit The map keying is wrong; compare with http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communes_du_Luxembourg +Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at The Real Inspector Hound. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +You have mail Adler +" I'm a childish comment? Wow, that's pure genius, I must congratulate you on your ability to perpetuate a well known American stereotype. Can I also be so bold as to recommend that when you go to school tomorrow you ask your English teacher to teach you the difference between Your and You're Talk " +then wrote this stupid comment +Link right here, Yuber: Egypt authorizes force to police 'unuthorized' Islamic tracts. Yes, they have more limited range (thankfully) than the Saudi Mutaween, no doubt due to Egypt's own issues in policing groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. +" I did just now see this, and was posting here when we were editing at the same time. I guess that maybe is all the evidence we need (though everyone else is just saying ""found dead Sunday""), and I won't contest a change back to Feb. 2. However, I should say that with an encyclopedia, I'm uncomfortable without some examiner saying, "" dead four hours"" or ""dead 12 hours"" — since without that, I don't see how the '""Times'' or anyone else can definitively say Sunday. What does everyone else thing? " +Odd - the 9th Legion seems to have got a kicking everywhere it went. No, not the same battle. Clearly there are now (at least) three in Britain we know about. The first was in Scotland, where a night attack took place on a fort, the second was when the 9th was reformed and marched North into Scotland, never to be seen again. The third involved Boadicea, who was a warlord(ess) way to the South, who seems to have given the 9th (it's THIRD reformation?) another kicking. Reading more about the first attack, it seems to fit very nicely into your Night Combat article, because it succeeded only because it was carried out at night - an advance unit snuck in the fort, opened the gates, and the hordes rushed in. Classic! They appear to have succeeded because the Romans couldn't even get their armour on in time, let alone form up in any sort of defensive phalanx. Interesting. +Crime and poverty Crime and poverty are indeed rated as major factors for mortality. I'm not sure if you were being serious or not on the CFD, but I found your comment slightly off the mark. +" Why is it that they are saying on Wikipedia's IRC channel that they should ""sink"" the wired article? Just to justify my block? Well, Sarah, you'll get great credit for this block! Well done! Good effort in censoring this one! " +this is a pile of bull i didnt do any of this!!!!!!!!!!1111 +Currently the 2nd paragraph doesn't mention the countries of the inventors. So I would suggest: Uppsala (sweden) and Wiltshire (UK) +United States home front during World War II. If there are no significant objections I'll move it accordingly in a day or two. +But what about other sources? If that book is the only source, then why not simply merge this information to other articles? IMO, notability has not yet been established. +" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Issus01.JPG) Thanks for uploading Image:Issus01.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (Talk) " +It looks like you're actually a Russian or a Russia expert, so I'm probably going to loose this one, but well, let's hear why I'm wrong in any case -) 08:15, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC) +You claimed I vandalized... Yet I did not. Either you're an illiterate dumbass, or you're just a jerk. Which one is it? +", 1 January 2008 (UTC) Well, you're an admin. If you truly believe in what you're saying, then you can permanently delete what's written, can you not? However, I don't think there is a lot of consensus here. Talk• Contributions 20:53" +Using the conditional in place of the subjunctive is grating, too -) +Hey, he's my sworn enemy...anything I can do to undermine his cause and get him banned I shall endevor upon. Do you have any ideas? +"= ACE2011 = Response Hey Hurricanefan, I just wanted to take a moment to explain the block you highlighted since it seems to have had an impact on your decision. That block, and this one (which precipitated mine) were part of an exchange between Alexandria and myself on IRC; I can assure you that no harm was intended or caused by these blocks; you'll note we took care to limit the duration and prevent any collateral from these blocks. I do agree with you that a bit of humor in ArbCom, and in fact all across Wikipedia, is well needed, but I can definitely assure you that jokes of this nature will be very few and far between, particularly now I know that it is a cause of concern with others. Additionally, I would like to again point out that my availability henceforth will not be a serious concern; I have a much more regular and predictable schedule now, and any absences I do have will be planned well in advance and announced to the Committee to ensure that there are no issues with the Committee's work. (//c) " +" You can also see that ""layout engine"" has the edge if you try the following searches: http://www.google.com/search?q=""browser engine"" AND ""HTML5 support"" -wikipedia -site:wikipedia.org http://www.google.com/search?q=""layout engine"" AND ""HTML5 support"" -wikipedia -site:wikipedia.org" +Image You`ve got it. +" Nationality of people from the United Kingdom RE this page Wikipedia:Nationality_of_people_from_the_United_Kingdom I'm finding the Irsish/ Northern Irish issue quite hard work. I thought your earlier version said the same things as mine (just was too technical throughout, which is the only reason I swapped mine back - I took a while trying to get it simple). ie that (in brief) a NI person can be British, dual or Irish, regarding their citizenship? RE your new edit - I don't understand now how all Northern Irish are Irish full-stop. Surely you need a papers to be a citizen of any country? Can you explain it to me here, or ideally on the Biography MOS talk page, where I made this subsection on Northern Ireland. At the moment the words Northern Irish links to this anchor link on ""Citizenship and identity"" which talks about an 'entitlement' to 'claim' Irish citizenship. If this is about pre-Stormont times, perhaps that fact can be written in - on top of the 'legal' details (about dual passports's etc)? " +, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Fairly irrelevant claims to the point being discussed, I am afraid.. One final note, as it is appearantly you are here who is claiming that the LW losses were such in the Battle of Britain that they were irreplacable and the LW strenght decreased after the Battle, the burden is proof is upon you by showing us figures with references for the entire Luftwaffe. 20:39 +Sorry for the delay. I totally agree with you. On this website you will need to cite your sources to prove that these people consider themselves as black or black american, what kind of mess is that? That user Mecelite or whatever how you spell it is not slick at all. +" Well, it is fact that many authors use the term ""neo-paganism"" when talking about Courtly Love (both on Google and elsewhere, from what I have read). Since the term and concept of Courtly Love was first popularized by Gaston Paris in the 1880's, and was not used before then, it may not be surprising if Paris used the Romantics notion of neopaganism in describing Courtly Love and has now become an ingrained part of the historiography. Indeed, the very idea of Courtly Love some historians believe never existed and was a romantic 19th C idea layered on the past. I really need to re-write this article from a historians perspective, one day. " +Harassment Campaign (Part 2) Just to let you know that as promised, the harassment campaign directed against you is underway. An article is in the progress of being created at the following adress, http://www.encyclopedia dramatica.com/User:The_JPS/C._Bedford_Crenshaw I will shortly be getting in contact with Wikipedia Review as well, and reporting to them your pedophilic activities. Never again will you be permitted to molest a child and get away with it +There is a source for the proposed spelling:http://www.keralabrethren.net/ +There! I got a little (very little) info on basic kirby info and a LOT of info on Powers/Copy Abilities. +hi guys i see youve redirected the clairsentience article.... let me ask....what was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anyway....you should have told me t get lost out of here...... what was the point of it all? why did i listen to you ? at all? why did i remove all personal references? why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail ? why did i edit and re edit for style and content ? why did i make additional references to religios , anthropological ,socialogical , philosophical ,medical , physics , chemistry , botany , mental health etc so that all views were included and respected? why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort. your actions are without integrity or honour ..... clairsentience article redirect ? Hi ..... whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect ... can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period...... .........i could delete this clairvoyance article.... but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl...... ..... i hope you can respect the clairsentience article... ..... ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example..... so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it.... +"I don't know anyone who has entertained the belief that Bacon had buggered Jonson. As for his servants, that may be a different matter. Bray suspects that it may have been the money Bacon gave them that brought the matter to notice: certainly, homosexual relations between masters and servants were clearly common enough to provoke the satirists. As for the weight allotted to it in the article: this is a classic situation in Wikipedia. Any implication of homosexuality in an historical figure has to be detailed and fully referenced beyond normal expectation, otherwise it is then accused of being an unsupported allegation, with the resulting endless edit war. In addition, the earlier point made on this thread about including it: ""Because a significant amount of modern scholarship is focused on how it affected the development of his ontology"" is extremely valid. The growth of gay studies departments within universities in recent years, and the flood of research and interpretation, is having a significant impact, and is literally re-writing history. To give a tiny example: the discoveries and interpretations in Crompton's 'Byron and Greek Love' have affected every Byron biography published after 1985. Multiply this a thousand times, and one gets an idea of the tsunami of change. For the homophobic this presents a confronting situation, but it's the reality. " +ATTENTION JD WOLF, Too much fanfare? Bull_Sh!!!!!!!!!! http://brainimmune.com/andor-szentivanyi-and-the-beta-adrenergic-theory-of-allergy-and-asthma/ +assumption of violations within the information I have provided. Would you please be a bit more specific or remove +Ok, I see what you mean. Just hold on for a while, and I promise to get back to you about this no later than tomorrow. I have so much in my plate at the moment that I am not able to peruse the matters closely, I have a huge backlog! No disrespect, I didn't mean any offense. I am also tired after a weird AfD, but I will definitely have a look. +My contribution I feel that I have to add something. Please note that the temporary solution defines Kosovo as a territory of Serbia and Montenegro under UN administration. Note that it's not defined as a part of Serbia, but the Union rather. This is mostly because they anticipated the future most probable status of Kosovo, a state within the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. However, you must realize that Serbia's (and the Union's) consitution defines Kosovo as an autonomous region, temporary under UN administration. The current borders of Serbia (and SCG) are internationally recognized and used everywhere (with Kosovo-Metohija). However, Kosovo is nowhere treated as an entity indistinct from Serbia (and most definatly not indistinct from the S-M), as no faction in the world sees it that way. I suggest that a possible compromise is that we should add that the Kosovar Albanian goverment refuses the Belgrade suzeiranity and considers it not a part of Serbia, and then the other side of the story (Serbia & the world), however, pointing it not an official part of Serbia and Montenegro is, francly, I apologize for the expression, but it is, really nonsensical. Hope that you will solve the case! +Slabs In Part 2 of this story, Clyde & Luke are sent to a storage area in crates by a gang of aliens in helmets, could these be Slabs (See Smith & Jones) by any chance? +" You really do need to justify that, BoxOfChickens. A great many editors link to articles they create. You seem to be in a great hurry to learn, and mistakes do happen, but you seem to be making more recently than is viewed as appropriate. Faddle " +then to never get the GA level +, who passed away recently +"::I've modified it thus: ""...and is said to have employed as many as 18,000 handloom weavers at the end of the 19th century, a figure significantly higher than the town's resident population at the time."" This implies that the figure might be incorrect or that workers commuted from out of town (which is a bit unlikely in those days I know). Hopefully this is enough to redress the issue. " +" June 2009 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. bravemonkey " +I don't think it will be that quick for all the races to mix into one, actually I think it will take at least twice that time. But this is funny too, because South Park had an episode about humans as a race in the future and this makes me remember this episode. +Your passive-aggressive dick-waving is exactly the sort of penny-ante tinpot authoritarianism which makes Wikipedia such an unpleasant place to participate. I've already told you repeatedly that I don't wish to have any further discussion with you - repeatedly - yet you insist on having the last word, on my own user page no less. If anyone else but an administrator did that, they'd call it trolling, and they'd be right. I made a WP:BOLD edit in good faith, which apparently gave you some kind of atomic wedgie. You reverted it, did some triumphant teabagging on my user page, and at this point your duty was over. Instead, here you are, still making vague threats and scary noises despite (or because of) my request that you shove off and stop trolling up my user page. You reverted my edit and did aa crazed monkey dance over the body of your slain enemy. Since it's clearly a matter of supreme importance to you and experience has told me that Wikipedia articles belong to the person with the most intense OCD, I have not bothered and will not bother to reinstate the edit. Therefore you have no reason to be here on my user page trying to intimidate me with your awesome and terrifying authori-tay. Kindly go away. - +Please do not recreate articles that have been speedily deleted. Thank you. 12:11, July 27, 2005 (UTC) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Frozone. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Hi Hi Mel, I am Manas. I don't think you would be tracking the names of people whose edits you remove or revert (:) hence I would introduce myself here. I was working on the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_answers_to_the_problem_of_evil and more particularly I had written http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hindu_answers_to_the_problem_of_evil&oldid;=56100080. The latter was reverted by you with the comment that it was a personal essay. I fully agree with you. I am very new to wikipedia and I come from the blogging world where the writing style is more like personal essays. My mistakes on wikipedia are more out of habit than intentional (or with ulterior motives). I would like to change these habits for sure. Can I expect some help from you (a teacher)? I would like to be a rather long term (serious) contributor to Wikipedia. Can I request you to tell me the kind of mistakes I made OR some tips for better wikipedia contribution (in terms of content and style)? I know you must be a busy person. But just in case you happen to have the time. Thanks & Regards, Manas Garg manasgarg@gmail.com +" It is also important to note that ""they"" reverted the 'official-style' referencing back to their informal previous citations, they also removed claims of dubious assertions and etc. the proof is [], [], [] " +What did i vandalise? - william@iamfake.com +" edit area. Do not include the ""tlx|"" code. >{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here" +Barrack Obama Barrack Obama is the best candidate for president. Finally, no more Bush! +27 22:38, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC) +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Okay...our mistake, we are very sorry for this error, thank you for pointing it out to us Request handled by: " +Actually, this probably would interest you Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Cumulus_Clouds, seems its just a zealous editor, but enough people know that to help moderate.'''''' talk +and Crime in the Dominican Republic +Colour Scheme If you're making SHBes, use it. - 4 July 2005 13:57 (UTC) } +" Oh also- JFW I don't really think you should be a doctor given your obvious accusation that the mother was guilty of munchausen by proxy. This is the klind of bigoted and ill informed pseudo-medicine that needs to be laughed into obscurity. I suggest you go read ""Why Freud was Wrong"" or even ""The Secret of Bryn Estyn"" before making a fool of yourself again. With reference to gulf war you have also obviously not looked at the work by Prof. Hooper, a close friend of a very helpful friend of mine- a gentleman by the name of Byron Hyde. alpinist" +" Of course I'm indef blocked. I pointed out that racism exists in Wikipedia. That is, by defniiton, an ""attack"" and a ""battle."". I pointed out that it can easily be connected to certain editors, including admins who patrol certain articles. That is, by definition, a personal attack. I pointed that admins are abusive and enjoy a double-standard. Again a personal attack! All the listed grounds for blocking here are judgement calls, so there is no contesting them, and hardly an incentive when the subject of my complaint is admins. The lone factual claim is wrong: I was not unblocked as Mindbunny for making any agreements. I made no compromises of any sort. The fact is Isalmophobia began with a 8 paragraph section undermining the concept of Isalmophobia. Antisemtism has a few scattered sentences criticising the concept. We all know damn well that there is no chance that Antisemitism would ever look like Islamaphobia, and that the systemic resistance to making them EQUAL is substantial. That's ""systemic bias,"" which is a euphemism for prejudice. It doesn't happen invisibly. Certain editors can be tied to it, and we all know some of them. We all know it is self-reinforcing: the bias alienates Muslims, Indonesians, Arabs, and other groups who are demographically non-English-speaking and have significant headwinds in gaining consensus on ideological subjects related to their ethnicity. Those who stick around get pissed, and get blocked, further reinforcing the bias. It makes an encycolpedia into a stupid power game to see whose prejudice will prevail. This community is plagued by systemic bias, i.e. racism, and it is plagued by a lack of accountability for admins. Communities that want respect from minorities need to give it. " +I'm the biggest you know what of whole wikipedia, if you want to vandalize me, go right ahead I'm the biggest you know what of whole wikipedia, if you want to vandalize me, go right ahead +If it's not there anymore (or moved, cause I know they do that when a lot of people direct link there rather then go through the advertisements) I uploaded it here for a while: http://ghost.adktrails.com/CC3.wmv +governments). They are openly POVed, but I guess that they could neutralize each other if we put them together. Anyway, I'll keep searching. Thanks Vassyana for your effort. It's helping us all to concentrate on content more than editors (which is no small achievement if we look at our history in the talk page...) Thanks Vassyana, I hope that you will help us to reach the long-elusive consensus. I agree however in that it will still be necessary to make an informed, but ultimately personal decision between possibilities for inclusion - unless we go for a formal bibliometric approach. I suspect that in the end we may need to seek external help to decide whether some details are to be included. But if we have a process which can lead to a decision, that's a definite improvement. Thanks again for taking an interest. Can I ask a couple of questions? Is there a reason why the same source has been listed three times? Once by me and subsequently twice by Imalbornoz. See +Written as a campaign article The article needs re-writing as of April 2014 as it is written as a campaign article. +Kkrystian, you can, however, link and refer to Ekantik/Gaurasundara as outlined on the ArbCom Evidence Page or my section about Ekantik on my Answers To Thatcher. talk-email +", 24 November 2005 (UTC) Proponents of ""conspiracy theory"" have yet to come up with an argument that successfully defends the phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation, all we have going on here is a popularity contest (mis)framed by a highly coordinated group of editors (disinformation artists perhaps?). It is ok that you choose not to debate, however, such a situation is insufficient evidence that a dispute doesn't exist. T 07:47" +" Absolutely, that is a problem. I'll keep any eye on his contributions, and drop him a note if he continues. // talk // // " +" Mlpearc says he still agrees that I am ""unnotable"" for thew record and thinks I should be ""speedily deleted."" I'm an internationally known author and Holocaust scholar. Amazon sells 19 of my books, only four of which were self-published. Amazingly, Mlpearc boasts on his Talk page or Wiki internal bio he's a high school drop out but DOES have his GED! I suspect there is a LOT of professional rivalry...in Mlpearc's mind, not in the opinion of Wiki editors who way back in 2011 decided to KEEP my Wiki bio because Wiki DOES think I'm notable. Mlpearc's comment above about still believing I'm a nobody doesn't rankle me. If there is ONE thing I am NOT insecure about it's my resume and other credentials. But Mlpearc's opinion that I'm not notable sounds rude to me. Anybody else agree? Again, THIS IS NOT A REQUEST TO UNBLOCK ME!Italic text I am through editing my Wiki bio. I'll let Mlpearc and nonsenseferret continue to inadvertently vandalize my Wiki bio, misspelling Hitler, my last name TWICE, etc. I have a book to write. I shouldn't be wasting my time with you clowns in here, but right now I'm Kindlizing my book, which is boring and NOT gratifying. Instead, I'm using the poor substitute of posting flaming new sections on my Talk page. Pathetic! I'm pathetic. Exactly what part of GFY don't you non-readers understand? You can't ban me. I'm abandoning my Wiki bio to you incompetent butchers who post notes on my Talk page restating claims that I'm not notable despite the 2011 KEEP determination by Wikipedia. LEAVE ME ALONE AND STOP SPAMMING MY AOL EMAIL IN-BOX WITH ""YOU HAVE A NEW MESSAGE ON YOUR TALK PAGE."" I guess I have to block your emails. ""One good block deserves another."" Henry VI, Part II, Shakesppeare, William GO AWAY! FrankSanello" +What is the device used for stiring contents of wok called? +"How is that point of view?! Shakespeare is also known as ""The Bard,"" it's a nickname. Tell me how that is POV? " +" True Steppa First of all, the ""electronicmusicstyles"" link is no good because it is a Wikipedia mirror. So, I deleted it. True Steppa, the ""funky house"" thing has vague, inadequate data that makes no sense. It doesn't belong on the ""list of electronic music genres"" page. It is not an opinion. You have to have good, relevant data for inclusion. It has nonsensical data that is mostly from Wikipedia. It's not good. " +and, to some extent, also black African +I dont have to answer to you or anyone. ye brought this on yourselves! there is a conspiracy against me on this, ye are determined to get rid of me but it wont happen! +"Block evasion. May need lengthening + range block. Old trolls die hard. ;) ((⊕)) " +Image copyright problem with Image:Obarr2.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Obarr2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. +Thanks Hi Cactus Writer, thanks for helping on the Drents Museum, I'm glad your dedicated to helping us! Cucumberkvp +Introduction Hi CFred. I saw that you were active on the Talk page of Yelp, Inc. and wanted to let you know I'll be working with Yelp to help them improve the page from Talk. I also pinged User:Wikidemon, who has responded to many of the strings on the article's Talk page, though I noticed he hasn't been logged in much recently. You can see an example of my approach to COI on the Talk page of RTI International (aka Research Triangle Institute). I just thought I would introduce myself and gauge your interest in collaborating on the Yelp page. PS - if you are still in the research triangle (your user page says you graduated from NC State) we're neighbors. I think Dennis Brown and Drmies are locals too. (Talk) +A temp protection at Nazi persecution of the Catholic Church in Poland might help, as he seems to be reverting a large section there, using a couple of different IPs. +-Was it really that hard to say that without templates? Thanks. PS- Thanks for the links to the articles you have made. You must have a happy and fulfilling life. +" I was trying to provide a chance to fix the problem because I thought something would be done about the quality, but it appears that this is not going to happen any time soon. It does not take three weeks to acquire sources for this type of basic topic, and even if it does, I don't see why you would remove the tags, since they could incite others to fix the article and inform readers that they should be wary about the facts stated here. I don't understand what would possess you to try to sweep this under the rug. Keep in mind that you still don't own the article. And ""sufficiently discussed""? There was no discussion when the article was filled with ""background"" and there wasn't even a majority supporting the idea in the RM vote. If we were to ignore the fact that we voted on a subjective fait accompli-version rather than a neutral dabpage which had been around far longer and is in line with all other similar... no, identical language/ethnicity terms, this would never have happened. And you have some really strange notions about the edit history. Read up, please. It's been a proper dapage since September 2004. The verbosity you and others inserted came along only this summer, and that was based on the last version of the original dabpage, not the other way around. Isotalo " +If that's the case, should we have a section on Rosenberg's viewpoints, add a section on the end of the world/apocalypse, and cite the Zahn show directly? +SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH U DONT KNOW ME SO I SUGGEST U KEEP UR FUCKIN MOUTH SHUT AND MIND UR OWN BUSINESS U DAMN NERD. +Best thing that happened before sliced bread . +" - someone edited out this important info that this Walker was grandfather of the two Bush US Presidents and that this walker's ancestors were chiefs of the Narragansett and Wampanoag Am Indian tribes ... as follows His two grandsons became Presidents of the USA - George Herbert Walker Bush (41st US President named for his grandfather) and his son George Walker Bush (43rd US President also named for his grandfather). Early American Ancestors Through George Herbert Walker's American Indian ancestors, his two descendants, the two Bush Presidents of the USA (George Herbert Walker Bush and his son George Walker Bush), are the only two American Indian descended US Presidents in US History. These American Indian ancestors included sachems or chiefs of the [[Narragansett {tribe)]] of Rhode Island and Wampanoag tribe of Massachussetts. Source to Walker Bush American Indian ancestors The Bush Family (2004) ISBN 0-595-66806-2 Language English 290 pages giving the line to today as follows 1 Tashtassuck - Sachem of the Narragansett Tribe b: ab 1530 d: aft 1620 2 Wessonsuoum of the Narragansett Tribe b: bef 1520 + Keneschoo of the Narragansett Tribe b: ab 1525 3 CANONICUS - SACHEM OF THE NARRAGANSETT TRIBE b: 1562 d: 4 JUN 1647 + Posh-Pw - of the Narragansett Tribe b: 1565 4 Daughter of Canonicus - Princess of the Narragansett Tribe b: 1567 + IYANNOUGH - SACHEM OF THE WAMPANOAG TRIBE b: 1554 d: 1641 5 IYANNOUGH - SACHEM OF THE WAMPANOAG TRIBE b: 1595 d: 1623 + ""Mary"" Noepe - Princess of the Wampanoag Tribe b: ABT 1597 6 MARY HYANNO of the WAMPANOAG TRIBE b: ab 1623 d: 1660 + Augustine (Immigrant, 1638 “Confidence”) Bearse b: 1618 d: aft 1686 7 Sarah (President Bush Ancestor) Bearse b: 28 MAR 1646 d: 30 MAR 1712 + John (President Bush Ancestor) Hamlin b: 26 JUN 1644 d: 1718 8 Ebenezer Hamlin b: 12 MAY 1683 d: 1736 + Thankful Hamlin b: 24 AUG 1689 d: 15 JAN 1768 9 Thankful Hamblin b: 6 AUG 1715 d: AFT 1768 + Joseph Bangs b: 30 JAN 1713 d: ABT 1757 10 Lemuel Bangs b: 31 DEC 1739 d: 9 MAY 1824 + Rebecca Keeler b: 29 APR 1751 d: 24 FEB 1812 11 Elijah Keeler Bangs b: 4 JUN 1780 d: 13 SEP 1846 + Esther Stackhouse b: 17 OCT 1787 d: 27 SEP 1819 12 Mary Ann Bangs b: 15 JUN 1817 d: AFT 1876 + Joseph Ambrose Beaky b: 14 JUN 1818 d: 27 JAN 1858 13 Martha Adela Beaky b: 1 JUN 1841 d: 1 JUL 1917 + David Davis Walker b: 19 JAN 1840 d: 4 OCT 1918 14 George Herbert Walker b: 11 JUN 1875 d: 24 JUN 1953 + Lucretia ""Loulie"" Wear b: 17 SEP 1874 d: 28 AUG 1961 15 Dorothy Walker b: 1 JUL 1901 d: 19 NOV 1992 + Sen. Prescott Sheldon Bush b: 15 MAY 1895 d: 8 OCT 1972 16 PRESIDENT GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH b: 12 JUN 1924 d: Living + FIRST LADY BARBARA PIERCE b: 8 JUN 1925 d: Living 17 PRESIDENT GEORGE WALKER ""DUBYA"" BUSH b: 6 JUL 1946 d: Living + FIRST LADY LAURA LANE WELCH b: 1946 d: Living 18 Living (twin) Bush 18 Living (twin) Bush 17 GOV. JOHN ELLIS ""JEB"" BUSH b: 11 FEB 1953 d: Living + Living Gallo" +Some English, please? Objectivity, as a method of philosophy, is dependent upon the presupposition distinguishing references in the field of epistemology regarding the ontological status of a possible objective reality, and the state of being objective in regard to references towards whatever is considered as objective reality. I don't have a clue about what the first sentence is supposed to mean! This article needs really serious rewriting. I'm not saying that someone has to do it right now, I'm just writing this on the talk page so maybe someone pays attention to the fact that the article, as it stands, is pretty bad. +Thank you. I assumed, wrongly, that he lived at Whalley House, his father's residence at Whalley Range, Manchester, a short walk from St.Margaret's. As for Mendel, its clear that he was able to play a squirarchical role at St. Clement's, which he presumably found appealling. 212.121.210.45 +"I agree in that someone who says that belief in a higher power shows poor judgment is not showing respect for that belief - but at the same time ""an eye for any eye"" leads to a world of blind men - and is being dismissive of that POV. And I don't think there is any disputing that much more blood has been shed in the name of God than in the name of Athiesm. But I agree, this does not negate any militancy you sensed in what you read. 72.92.4.157 " +" ? No. That's your interpretation. I simply removed my contributions to those articles. (Whether said contributions improved those articles or not, is matter of opinion. Apparently your opinion was that my edits were improvement. Gee thanks. But it doesn't have to be everyone's opinion, does it? Not even mind sometimes, since my edit history is filled with self-reverts.) You are wrong about ""can't take it back"", since any self-revert does just that, and self-reverts are permitted, Mr. Mann jess. Again, it is just a matter of opinion whether my edits were improvements or disimprovements. It isn't an objective thing as you portend to assert. I don't have any ""feud"" with you, Mann jess. I just can't stand your aggressive bulliness, and overconfidence in the subject matter. And won't go through what is necessary to oppose your disimprovements to articles, because Quale has your back, and has already complimientd you, and disparaged me. So go for it. Keep making those improvements to chess articles. (BTW, it's ""chess"", not ""Chess"". A check is a condition on the board, not a move. A short sentence should not have 4 commas. Proofs are not ""sample games"". Demo programs to aid understanding an article subject that no amount of text can convey, are not ""against policy"".) I think you suck as editor. But your tramping ground is here at WP to prove your ego. Go tramp on the ground then. Beat your drum. Just stay the hell away from me, you aggressive moron. " +" Dubious 'fact' Under criticism section state ""Some gay activists, however.."" Exactly who determine what 'some' gay activist, not 'most' activist? Any proof to back that only 'some' gay activist? Another quote ""Many gay rights activists defend outing as a tactic."" Exactly who are these 'many' gay activist? Again, is there any proof (link source) that majority actually support outing tactic compare to minority of the gay activist supporting this? These words ""many"" and ""some"" are quite suspiciously like someone's opinion which violate the wikipedia code of conduct when it comes to writing articles." +You are admitting creation of it or are you admitting only accusation of creating it? Either way, given the history of the account and the behavior behind it, I must concur with TruthCrusader's suspicion. Why is it okay for you to accuse others of being sockpuppets, but not okay for others to accuse you of doing the same thing? +Entirely inappropriate personal attack written in this space, suggesting that this user should edit the articles directly instead of just complaining about 'POV' and adding 'clean up' tags. TTLR (oh wait... just in case the wikihistory button doesn't work on your computer...) +Update a few minutes later: Alright, I split up the footnote into three separate ones. There is no card catalog number for the 16 millimeter film of the First Tuesday NBC television segment. Just go to the film library and ask for Janis Joplin: Portrait of a Ripoff. It was broadcast shortly after the January 1971 release of Joplin's posthumous Pearl album, which got a lot of publicity because she was recently dead at the time. If this is not good enough, I give up. You won't hear from me again. Other stuff I put in this very popular article was deleted by Wikipedia regulars are they considered vandals ? I don't care anymore. dooyar +" Farix is resigned to defend this article to the death, because the status quo (making this article essentially worse than any other US-based article about similar material, at least at the very beginning before going onward) means that Farix is able to engage in a personal act of trolling. It offends immediately, at the very top, with no indication the article may be offensive beforehand, such as the classic example of ""tentacle porn"" has done before this page was...changed. Primetech " +" However, you could use the same argument to delete almost everything in the article because many encyclopedias include a description of Jimmu so short it doesn't even cover things like the origins of his name and title and the issue of his historicity. In regards to the consensus of Wikipedia editors, and I'm not referring to Flying Tiger, when Nishidani proposed that in the long run we discuss all aspects of Jimmu's memory from start to finish, including medieval and Tokugawa times, historiography, and popular culture, most users who commented agreed with that even though it's safe to say that no encyclopedias cover these last three things. It's certain that people in Japan made a clear link between Hakko Ichiu and Jimmu and if you had done a less restrictive book search, you would still have found no fewer than 430 English language sources noting this connection, including the reliable sources this article cites like Edwards, Dower, Earhart, Ruoff, and Brownlee. For instance, Emperor Hirohito evidently referred to Jimmu when he said ""It has been the great instruction bequeathed by Our Imperial Foundress (the Sun Goddess) and other Imperial Ancestors that our grand moral obligation should be extended to all directions and the world be unified under one roof."" As historian James McClain notes ""As every Japanese schoolchild who had read Kokutai no Hongi knew by heart, hakko ichiu meant 'eight cords, one roof' and first appeared in the eighth-century chronicle Nihon Shoki."" The association between Jimmu and Hakko Ichiu was extensively cultivated in wartime Japan, most scholars are aware of that, and it is highly relevant for Wikipedia purposes. Concerning our four sentences on Hakko Ichiu, for now I'd say we can shorten it to three if necessary, possibly deleting the sentence cited to Bix, but otherwise I see no reason or consensus to trim it back further than that. Frankly, as the article gradually expands there is even more that can be eventually noted here such as perhaps uchiteshi yamamu, the other wartime phrase attributed to Jimmu, or possibly Okawa Shumei's establishment of the Jimmu Society. The resurrection of the Jimmu propaganda machine in modern times does not need to be downplayed for fear of ""completely ignorant anti-Japanese POV-pushers"". Actually, I think we should try to contact Flying Tiger and let him speak here if we're going to keep on talking about him in those kind of terms. " +Bernie Sanders Delete first ask questions later? Hmmm...butt hurt much! Here is your source, son - http://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/07/03/us/04Sanders-web-01/04Sanders-web-01-blog427.jpg He had a kid when he was that age. That is not from his current wife. Now quit fking with my edits because you're a liberal kook.162.216.14.26 +Not intended to be promotional but to follow similar articles on other rule sets already in WP +SHUT UP AND LEAVE ME ALONE FAGGOT! SHUT UP. GO AHEAD BAN ME I DON'T CARE. JUST SHUT UP AND LEAVE MY ALONE. +" Wooohhh you are the MAN!! Damn, I thought I was gonna have to do it all by myself. As I told you before, you have a black-magic touch to find those things in the 'net. I spent the whole day yesterday, and copuldn't find anything. Hey I want to improve the article as much as possible, to nominate it for FL. Just let me know anything ok. Spit it Out! " +Does MDMA belong on this page? The stimulant effects of MDMA are small for most users, certainly compared to related chemicals such as Ephedrine and the other, non-empathogenic Amphetamines. The desired psychological effect of MDMA use has little in common with classical psychostimulant effects. Should MDMA really have a section here? +Diagrams for knitting Re your request: I can probably do some diagrams for knitting, but it may take me a while to get to them - been swamped with my day job until a few days ago, and have a huge wiki to-do list. Happy new year... - +See International Phonetic Alphabet chart for English dialects. — +is there someplace in particular you are struggling with? thx +" Urgent request. I have determined that you are a reasonable person and would like for you to help we with a problem I am having with another admin. Please see my talk page. (speak) " +"Actually, it is not known commonly as ""Revelation"" but as ""Revelations"". People who point out that the latter is not a correct rendering of what is written are missing the point, which is that the plural form both is in ordinary spoken use, and has come down from a separate oral/visual tradition (a bit like Adam and Eve eating an apple, simply because that was the fruit ordinarily shown in stained glass window versions). PML." +Not to be too much of an I told you so, but the school IP template was fake; it's a BellSouth IP, likely from a phone, as that would explain the egregious writing from this user. +" Please sign posts, folks. I'm sure the Jones link will be scrubbed. That said, if you're looking for humor, I'd say it was hilarious when Rothschild claimed Jupiter was closer to the sun than earth. It was also hilarious when Jones said ""Take me lord Rothschild, take me!"" in immitation of a woman being impressed at Rothschilds self-given title of ""adventurer"". Also, Jones never accused David Mayer de Rothschild personally of being the head of a neo-feudal empire, he did however infer that his family was involved with such. Rothschild repeatedly accused Jones of being an oil baron, which is absurd and ironic considering the Rothschild investments in big oil. Anyway, if we're to believe David de Rothschild's book, then the solution to global warming is to wear sweaters, ride in electric geo metros packed like clown cars, and build straw houses. If anyone can show me a Rothschild (of the actual European banking line) that doesn't live in a castle and instead lives in a straw house, I will actually waste money on this chap's silly, insulting book. I wonder how many beautiful trees are now dead because David de Rothschild wanted to publish this book. As for Rothschild's demeanor, of course he was somewhat calm, it's part of the training. The best liars are always calm because they have gone to schools where that selling point technique is taught. It's called public relations, and it only works on dullards in my opinion. hyper_individualist@yahoo.com " +" In the criticism and research section: '....various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience. This has largely been due to lack of replication of results by independent experimenters' The references for this statement are as follows: Hyman, Ray (1995). ""Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena"". The Journal of Parapsychology 59 (1). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n4_v59/ai_18445600. Retrieved 2007-07-30. ^ Akers, C. (1986). Methodological Criticisms of Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 4. PesquisaPSI. http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances4/7_Methodological_Criticisms.html. Retrieved 2007-07-30. ^ Child, I.L. (1987). Criticism in Experimental Parapsychology, Advances in Parapsychological Research 5. PesquisaPSI. http://www.pesquisapsi.com/books/advances5/6_Criticism_in_Experimental.html. Retrieved 2007-07-30. ^ Wiseman, Richard; Smith, Matthew, et al. (1996). ""Exploring possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld experiments - Psychophysical Research Laboratories"". The Journal of Parapsychology. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n2_v60/ai_18960809. Retrieved 2007-07-30. The way in which this information is given suggests that such researchers are independent. Just looking at the names of the studies, this can be seen as incorrect: 'Methodological Criticisms of Parapsychology' 'Criticism in Experimental Parapsychology' I am less aware of the reliability of the others, but using Hyman and Wiseman immediately rings alarm bells. Cheers. " +" Processor number - Relevant/irrelevant An edit war is brewing over the relevance of Bender's processor. One person argues that it has no ""real world relevance"" while I feel that Bender's processor (6502) is a real microprocessor used in early home computers such as Atari and Apple and thus warrants inclusion. I back this up by the fact that other parts of Bender are listed in the description such as his unit number, serial number, and chassis number. What argument is there against including his processor type? " +" Reasons for merger say, a article can be merged in the condition of if it is Duplicate, Overlaps, have very few Text or content. It depends upon the quality of the article as well. Instead of questing me support the merger proposal. There are numerous examples on Wikipedia, have a look of these two article Gonda district and Gonda, Uttar Pradesh. ''' {talk • contribs} " +REDIRECT Talk:United States v. Progressive, Inc./Archive 1 +new message wikipedia dickheads go and fuck your selves +No, I'm not a lawyer or law student, but my job requires working closely with the legal system, and I did take a few undergraduate law classes while in college. That, and way too many of my friends are lawyers. I will see what I can do with the Blagojevich page. +Add antisemetic navbar The 9/11 truth movement's participants are neonazis and should be reflected by adding . +Can you creat article about this two Vishal1976 Jyotiba ( God - A aspect of shiva near Kolhapur city ) Veer Mhaskoba - An origanal aspect of shiva in the later aspect of Kabhairav of Kashi (Varanasi). The temple of Veer Mhaskoba is situated in Pune district in Purandhar taluka near Saswad in Veer village. I have got good information about this god and if someone creat article i will expand that article. Vishal1976 +P.S. Don't bother to answer (at least not at my talk page), since I log in once every 6 months. +Viking Moses Living a nomadic life for nearly a decade now, Brendon Massei (born in Midland, Michigan to truck drivers) has released music albums under several names (Spork, Supperbell Roundup, Viking Moses). Perpetually on tour (since 1996), he has played with Will Oldham, Cat Power, Songs: Ohia and Devendra Banhart, to name a few, yet Massei’s body of work has received little commercial or critical attention. His newest full-length under the Viking Moses moniker, the story-song cycle Crosses, is by far his most accomplished work, and ranks among the best of the newest crop of American folk recordings. A Viking Moses show often finds Massei on his knees wailing like a man possessed. +I did not ignore the hangon notice. I read your explanation and decided that it was not enough to prevent deletion. There are multiple issues with Renegade Rugby as you created it. The most obvious is that it is a clear copyright violation. We cannot ignore copyright violations just because you make a claim that you grant permission. There is no way to know if you are the copyright holder or not. To grant permission we would need the copyright holder to release the work under an appropriate license. The best way to do this would be to tag the original webpage with the license that it is being released under. We obviously can't just accept any editor's word that they are the copyright holder while a clear statement of copyright exists on the original material, if we did anyone could make such a claim for any work and we would not be able to obey the law on copyrights. Assuming you are the copyright holder and make the change, we would still require that the text undergo major revision before it could be accepted in a Wikipedia article. In its current state it clearly does not meet our policies on maintaining a neutral point of view and its is not verifiable because it does not have any independent, published sources for the content. I'd recommend you read those two policies before attempting to recreate the article - even after you have resolved the copyright issue. Best, +Fuck off you cunt. I know a LOT more about Flynn than you. Don't take out referenced stuff or ELSE. +" Input needed on a Wikiversity project Hi Jimbo Wales. I'm trying to get a project started on Wikiversity: Wikipedia and the 2008 US elections‎, which is a research project on how Wikipedia articles are created and improved, particularly when the topic is the subject of strong sentiments and relates to events that change over the time period in the study (probably January 2008 through January 2009, but there's some question about when the campaign actually ""began""). I'm leaving you (and a few other folks) this note because you've had some interest in Wikiversity's studies of Wikipedia in the past, I wanted to get a few more eyes on the project before announcing it on Wikipedia: I hope to do that over the next few days on the talk pages of the 4 ""beta test"" articles: Barack Obama, John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Joe Biden, with a broader announcement later after the initial kinks are worked out. I was also hoping you would know people who would be interested in this, as well as knowing people with a few ""special skills"", including: Data collection and sorting from the article histories (how many edits and what sorts of edits over a given time period, etc.) People who can make good graphs and charts from that data people who can help develop guidelines for whether and how to discuss individual editors if they are felt to be ""notable"" I think this could be a very fruitful study: Wikipedia's model of content creation is quite complicated, but it works! SB_Johnny | talk " +Mental illness Hi! It would aid our interaction with you, if you could disclose any diagnosed or suspected mental illnesses which can explain your behavior, such as autism, schizophrenia, multiple personalities. Thank you. — (Email) (Talk) +Such as? I edited the section with the genetic study as your criticism was valid there. What else? Please raise the questions here first. The article was voted on through a concensus of a lot of people. +Polar Bear-baiting This article was recently deleted. It should not have been deleted, as it was factually correct including citations. Is there a way to recover the deleted article ? I did not save it to my hard drive. Thank you +" Vandalism by User:Wiggy! deletes OFFICIAL polish name 1. FC Katowice from 1920s, 1930s and today. manipulation with name club in today, club was reactivated in 2007, with named! arms! formed date 1905! and other. This is not only the same name. Even, if it is the conflict, need to leave neutral intro. cheating with a ""German club"", from 1922 do 1939 this is polish club! I know, you interested in the old German clubs but this club is different. Please, make your ""German"" cleanup in example Diana Kattowitz or Germania Kattowitz - they were the only German and were not reactivated. " +Humus Sapien removed the valid link. +AMG Copy This article was just copied and pasted from AMG. +This article has gone to hell I am tired of the crap from all of you. I am done trying to keep this article readable and clean. You all can screw this article up all you want. I am tired of uptight power hungry ass holes not waiting till someoen is finished, just assuming that I have converted the entire article back to the original. they didn't bother to look and see that it's the same article, just cleaned up some with new information added. It's also bull shit that rider tips, a major part of the WDW monorail system, is removed, but the toy remained, BOTH are part of the WDW monorail experiance. But who cares about the content of the articles, as long as it looks good and meets some retarted code of style. Who cares that refrences that went no where were removed. lets block the guy for trying to give good refs to non borken links. Also odd that thre is a ref to a site that refs back to this article. Now we can't have a ref to a legit site with legit information just because it's a site by the editor, but we CAN have a ref to a site that send you in circles back to this article. But as I said, this article has gone to hell. It is no longer a good resorce for information. I will wait and maybe in enough time trey, Kralizec!, Maelwys , and the rest will stop trying to own this article and will let other editors fix it up. Untill then this article will remain crap. Again I say, I feel sorry for anyone doing research trying to find info on the WDW monorail system and finding this article. So go have fun trashing this article. I'll kep an eye on it and maybe come back later. +" October 2014 The Super Disambiguator's Bonus Barnstar The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to the winners of the Disambiguation Pages With Links monthly challenge (bonus list section) who have gone above and beyond to remove ambiguous links.This award is presented to ', for successfully fixing 1966 links in the bonus list challenge of September, 2014''. ''' (sing) @ " +say that we like using wkipedia andyou should sell it to us thank you and have a nice day +Decided I'd just reword the new last sentence too. It could sound better, but it's both more accurate and more appropriate for Wikipedia now. 82.139.118.219 +As said before, it's a picture or pictures from a screen. Something anyone can take. If you want to believe slim chances and all, that's up to you. Considering the accusing factor has been flatout lying to us about it before however, aside from the irrelevance of it all, this is all a waste of time. +Modern team? Bob Berry - 1963-64, MMJHL Jude Drouin - 1965-66 QJHL Guy Lapointe - 1965-67 QJHL Guy Charron - 1966-68 QJHL Rey Comeau - 1966-68 QJHL Jake Rathwell - 1966-67 QJHL Andre Dupont - 1967-68 QJHL Gilles Meloche - 1969-70 QMJHL Pierre Hamel - 1969-71 QMJHL Peter Folco § - 1969-72 QMJHL Richard Brodeur - 1970-71 QMJHL Richard Grenier - 1971-72 QMJHL Bob Sauve - 1971-72 QMJHL Other Verdun teams Verdun LaSalle Verdun Maple Leafs may have become Verdun / LaSalle in 1950-51. Jim Bartlett - 1950-51 QJHL Marc Boileau - 1950-51 QJHL Guy Rousseau - 1950-51 QJHL Verdun Cyclones +What Protonk said. No reason for deletion was given at all, and the AFD would have not ended with a delete for Pikachu, or, for that matter, the other nominations. Additionally, group noms tend to fail more often than not. '''''' +I'll have to go look it up +Can you try to implement this incrementally in the article instead of doing a cut and paste? (I've started on the process, and I don't want all my edits to be blown away.) (talk) +Its common sense dumbass, it was a fight in the WEC 67.163.17.113 +If you dont mind, could you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Villers-Bocage/archive2 and the comments raised by +" Edit request on 6 December 2012 The film is ""hit"" not ""superhit"" according to BoxOfficeIndia.com: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=earnings So in the third paragraph it should be "" Box Office India declared the film a ""hit"" in India"" 139.190.140.12 139.190.140.12 " +You miss the point, obviously both Russian and Georgian media are biased, there is no point including claims to that effect, the question is whether outside media is biased. +REDIRECT Talk:Greek submarine Papanikolis (Y-2) +" I second this opinion. In fact, rather than saying that there was no link, the paper seems to suggest the opposite.  (rawr!) " +She has been signed, see http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=local&id;=5028016 +", 7 March 2006 (UTC) Yes, I'm sure it's possible that the many books and articles on the topic, written by various well-known authors, or found in reputable sources, are, in fact, completely wrong, but you'd have to find other reputable sources to refute them; your own personal concern with the concept is not particularly relevant. Regarding the definition, it's pretty much the same as it was 3 months ago, and the forumulation which presents it more as perception than fact is in deference both to NPOV, and to various editors (like yourself) who were opposed to the concept that it existed at all. Finally, the photograph does not really illustrate the concept well; a far better one would be the rather common ""Star of David = Swastika"" signs you say at various rallies. (talk) 17:53" +" Commons image category I've just proposed some changes to the Commons category, to sort it all out. You may wish to have a look at Commons:Category talk:Southern Vectis. P.S. I've also changed the archive here, see thread above. 2009/10 should follow (probably put those together), and I'll have to move the bit in the 2008 archive which is actually from 2009 into the other one. talk/contribs " +Applied section as proposed and agreed here. It's much shorter and heavily sourced. Regards. +" April 2010 (UTC) The section title for this topic seems too long; I suggest replace ""Next topic I'd like to discuss - too long"" with the shorter title ""Text perhaps too long"". -Wikid77 00:59, 29" +Hi, Earlier I created an article called Celoxis and has uploaded the logo. But for some reason the article was deleted and the logo was deleted by you as it was unused non-free media file for more than 7 days. Now the Celoxis article is back on Wikipedia and I request you to restore the logo. The logo file was +Since ISKCON is a part of Gaudiya tradition, and since the ISKCON religous figures category is a subcategory of the Gaudiya religous figures category (which is a subcategory of Hindu religious figures), then the ISKCON religious figures category alone should suffice (being thus all three). This should work for the three maharajas listed above as well. Does that sound reasonable? Thanks. +":::::::::*""White House"" and ""AACS encryption key"" are not person's names, but I do concede that we have some articles with a title composed of a person's name combined with a controversy. The rest of my comments stand. Since the title of either article is not a question to be answered in this RfC, this will be useful information to consider for another discussion.- MrX " +" My dear Z My dear Londoner, I've just seen your new userpage, and tho I must tell you I like it very much, it has a formatting problem when seen with resolutions below 1280x1024px. I think I can fix it, tho - do I have a go to try? ;) Love, - " +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Tally-ho! " +Tabley House Hi Peter. Yes, you're quite right, it's not totally clear when the house started to be used for elderly care services. But this source suggests that it was at least as early as 9 April 2009. In fact, it looks like the report from that date was the first one. +PPdd, it basically doesn't matter what DanieliM says. Either people will believe it is just you posing as her, or they'll believe she's saying what you would want her to, or they'll think she's independent (because she has a completely different stylecurt and reserved?). There's really no point making an issue out of it. You two should just go back to editing articles and if you are involved in a dispute together, make it clear that you know eachother so it doesn't result in endless sock/meat investigations. Read WP:MEAT closely; there's nothing wrong with collaboration, as long as it's not conspiratorial or sinister. +" Trivia? ""Lightfoot is referenced in many episodes of the animated TV series Mission Hill, by character Kevin French."" was added. Is this good, or should it be deleted? " +How are you going to handle notable alumni like Duffield who attended two different Cornell programs and received two different degrees? +Well I'm gonna have to look but I watched it on T.V. and read it in a book that t-rex was more robust just meaning that it was more heavily built or more muscular than Giga. It's that a little misleading though? Diplodocus is longer than Brachiosaurus but it's not larger or heavier than Brachiosaurus. Yeah I can't argue about it's skull length it does have a big head. Which is kinda funny considering T-Rex has the largest tooth size than any other carnivore. mcelite +" Okay I'll say ""Use of possible sock account to enforce a false consensus on the Mick Taylor article"". Call me Pat " +" Well, pretty much. There is Bob Pitman's ""Mesoplodon sp. B"", which he sighted a couple of times in the eastern tropical Pacific. The individuals seen had a very long rostrum with a white lower jaw and dark upper jaw with ""a distinct pale patch behind the eye"" that may be reminiscent of the one visible on the adult female specimen from Opape Beach. Pitman speculated at the time that it could be Mesopolodon bahamondi (= M. traversii). " +This article needs an infobox This article is in dire need of an infobox. It goes to show that Corbett OWNS this article and that Cassianto stands by with his pitchfork when Corbett is not available. I'm surprised at an admin (Bencherlite) getting involved and going against community consensus. Millions of articles have a infobox and THAT is a consensus. 195.89.48.217 +21:52, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) +aight nerd you suck. fin. P.S. get a life nerd! do something other than edit wiki all day! get laid! get a hobby! +" I'll look at this article more carefully tomorrow, but I'm a little concerned with the use of Kavan to kick off the whole background section. She gives quite a... shall we say ""unique"" interpretation to Falun Gong's reception in China in the early years. I'm not saying she should not be quoted, but using a single source like that to orient the entire issue seems quite out of order. Anyway, historically on these pages we've had our fair share of undue pro-Falun Gong sentiments, so I guess I understand. Let's just try to keep it professional.12345 " +" Failed GA Looks OK but is insufficiently referenced. No inline citations and only four general references, two of which are about art and one is a travel guide. It's unlikely that those sources are adequate for the level of detail given in this article. (talk) (e@) " +" ""Last putative Ediacaran"" What is this ""last putative Ediacaran"" which the timeline speaks of?  ( – Talk) " +By the way, it's not even mentioned on that page other than in the see also section. +Well, it seems to be solved now. -) +These primary source op-eds and advocacy sites are poor quality sources. Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. +Hello Ellibirdfly Hello Ellibirdfly, I made some edits to the LV http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lost_Valley_Educational_Center&diff;=prev&oldid;=477206719 page and hope you find them contributions to what you had added. Peace, +You You already pulled this persecution and threatening crap once. I don't care what you say, you're just a thug. Got it? +And was before was under Prussian control from the beginning of state formation in this area is not it? >This intolerance and disregard for any other citizenship or affiliation is shown over and over at wikipedia by many Polish people. There is mentioned in the article: “Prussia (later Germany) thus he was a German citizen.” I think you do not tolerate the thing the nationality is before that. >The Polish law on Citizenship seems to supports something like this attitude. While dual citizenship is tolerated, no other citizenship than Polish is recognized. You mean on territory of Poland. Yes I believe it is if you are Polish citizen and you enter Polish territory you can not disregard the any the duties as such. You can not be both at the same time on territory of Poland and claim different treatment and rights. Simple you can not switch with rights and duets as it is convenient at a moment. I think this is reasonable solution >Poland only recognizes a dual citizenship person as being only Polish. It is not so simple but something like I explained above. >Johann Dzierzon was not born in Poland. His father, grandfather, etc were not born in Poland. They were all born in Lowkowitz, Silesia, Prussia, Germany. You know, my perception is that in history Germans changed their minds. When was convenient the people were Germans citizens (subjects) on other time when convenient there were some individuals were set as alien element because their origin. This imperial politic injustice. >The person Johann Dzierzon on Wikipedia is now Jan Dzierżon, completely overloaded with Polish-language sources. And it should be as Jan Dzierżon is Polish name and he recognized himself as Polish. Also his closest relatives in at least two next generation continued this way. >Many of those are already in the bottom references, so now we have the same Polish 'sources' plastered onto Dzierzon double or triple times. Sorry. You can dislike it but “Further reading” is chosen set of most informative publications. That is other purpose. >Seems like complete overkill and against Wikipedia policy. I do not know what you mean. >No wonder Encyclopedia Britannica reflects this kind of overload . There is also on some newest French encyclopaedias on line. I am sorry you are disappointed. It sometimes hapend that our own point of view is not the common one. Best regards, +Top Model Pedrictions My Prediction: 6th place: Lauren 5th place: Marvita 4th place: Claire 3th place: Fatima 2nd place: Katarjenna 1st place: Anya +Oh, and just one comment. You added a comment to the page Talk:Swiss franc. At the same time, you removed, probably by mistake, a series of comments made by other people — I have restored the missing comments now. All the best, +" What dont you understand Dreadster, all the explanations, discussing and EVENTUAL ruling is in the talk page of the European football records page, do you not understand English. There was countless weeks of arguing about the fairs cup then and it was finally agreed that it would be included, saudi999 obviously hasn'ta a clue. So i suggest you go back and read the talk page of the EUROPEAN FOOTBALL RECORDS page and see all the arguing and eventual ruling, then revert it back. WHY HAVE ANOTHER POLL WHEN IT WAS ALREADY DECIDED. Now please revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadiga09 (talk • contribs) What I do understand is Wikipedia:Civility and how to communicate with other editors, something you seem to be having difficulty with - so much so that you have been disruptive on the articles with your edit warring, and also on the talk pages with your communications like the above - if you bother to communicate there at all. This places you in the position being blocked, so I'd advise modifying your behavior before that happens. † " +I also want this as a picture, and I also want a map of the location! Please help someone! http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/4180685.jpg +Which website i added a hindu link also( ) +"|decline=Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally, and edits to them must be constructive. Your edits were disruptive. (//c) " +Such a theory, in fact pure POV, show obviously a bad knowledge of French and Occitan linguistics. +" If you look at File:Stephania 1.JPG now, you will see that your originally uploaded image has already been deleted ""del original (non-anonymized) version, for BLP concerns)"". Wikipedia is fast with such things. " +Wich principle i do not respect???????????????????????????????????????????????? ( ) +Unblock Unblock| I wish to create an account. I have sent an email to the account creators but I have had one created. So I request an unblock so that I can create an account.}} +, although that action does not appear to have been completed. Please post an update when the block is no longer active. Thanks +Discussion You say their is a discussion going on. Do you mean the debate on the delete the list of creatures from Primeval page or is their some other discussion going on elsewhere? +" I really don't know and admit my sample size is small -). But I do believe their approach isn't satisfactory as a core foundation for the ""treatment"" section in an encyclopedia. Even if they reliably did good work, their output is not directly relevant to ""how is this disease treated?"". I think we forget that is the primary question. The ""why is this treatment recommended?"" is a secondary question which ultimately leads to the ""what evidence is there that it is effective/safe?"", along with ""is it available in my country?"" and ""what are the side effects?"", etc, etc. But sadly it seems WP medical articles are not written by people asking reader-questions in order to guide what to say. They are written by non-experts surveying the handy output of PubMed and collating a bunch of factoids they don't fully understand. In fact, that approach sounds just like the one done by the volunteer authors of the Cochrane ketogenic diet paper, who are district hospital doctors with no clinical experience of the subject. I managed to avoid your cold through my regime of mega-vitamins, herbal tinctures and homeopathic bath salts. -) °Talk " +Incosistancy in International appearances In the information box on the right hand side it says he got 31 caps and 9 goals while information in the article states he started for England 17 times and made 16 substitute appearences...that suggests 33 caps? Could someone sort this out? +Thanks x 73 I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA (even if it seemed redundant to you), and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! 'blis +"do any change to a picture in the Image viewer of Windows the changes are automatic saved with No alternative! @ I beg them to solve it or at least give us the alternative Excuse my English (talk me) It's already mentioned at Windows Picture and Fax Viewer#Known issues. Compatibility Paul Thurott has written an article about compatibility issues with the Beta, which makes me doubt the final release's compatibility. Removed Features _/|\_I don't know why the Removed Features section claims that the classic start menu and taskbar will be removed. Nor do I know why the Inkball game is supposedly removed. This section cites no references and these claims are the most questionable. I'm not sure as the the reasons as to why they we're removed but I can tell you that Ink Ball is not found anywhere in the beta release, I'm not sure about the classic start menu and taskbar, i don't see an option for them but I didn't look all that hard Inkball only appears in Tablet Edition windows products. Is there a tablet addition of the Windows 7 beta? Hmm... I may be wrong there. The article mentions that it also appeared in Vista Home Edition. Still, Can't imagine it's very fun with a mouse. It does indeed come with Vista Home Premium, not sure about other editions. It also comes with Ultimate. But anyway, mentioning it has been removed if the only evidence we have is it's not included in the current beta is an incredibly bad idea. We need a reliable source saying Microsoft has decided to remove it. There could be plenty of reasons why it's not in beta, only one of them is Microsoft has decided to remove it completely Beta Release The date of the release of the Beta should be January 7 (Release on MSDN to TechBeta and TechNet customers) or January 9 (Release to public) ?? - Excuse my English (talk me) 06:04, " +Most numbers less than 1000 are numerologically interesting; 111 combines three ones into a whole, and therefore symbolizes the Trinity. 20:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) +"==Banned sockpuppet== This guy, Zephram, is obviously addicted to Wikipedia, so I doubt he'll stop contributing. Some of his past edits have been pretty good. Instead of deleting them to piss him off, why don't we use them as leverage? We could say, ""Play nice or we'll delete all of your contributions."" " +" Understood, I just responded on the talk:coleco page as well. I can certainly agree with that, and its a perfect example of why the ""Consensus needed"" situation was defined in the guidelines. In this case, consensus is being formed against, which in turn solidifies the validity of the guidelines. That's my only real concern in this rather than they just being blindly removed as was happening. " +" Oddly enough, I am truly agnostic on this particular bit of software. It's always been my position that it should have a fair trial, but it seems that at every step things have been problematic. First off, there was the fact it was introduced immediately on the heels of two other major UI changes (the addition of revision deletion to the admin toolkit, and the switchover to Vector). Then there was the fact that the version on the test wiki was *not* the version to be introduced here, so nobody could even test it properly on the testwiki. The trial criteria were not developed until just days before the trial itself, and there were no benchmarks set to determine whether or not there was any change over time, or whether that change was positive or negative. The majority of early supporters in the original PC poll wanted it to be focused on BLPs, but for some reason at the end of the poll it was decided that PC should be applied to currently protected or semi-protected articles instead, and those were the articles targeted in the trial. The WMF press on the subject specifically referred to the ability for anonymous and newly-registered users to edit long-time semi-protected articles of high profile topics (the George W. Bush article was specifically mentioned), without discussing this in advance with the community. (It lasted less than 2 days on pending changes, with mountains of vandalism during that period.) Then there was the promise by the lead developer that PC would be shut off at the end of 60 days unless the community clearly requested otherwise. Four days later, when lead developer responsibility changed hands, the new lead developer announced that he would rather keep things running during any review, on a quiet page with only the most interested editors watching. Even with all of this disarray, I still hoped that we could get a reasonable trial of the tool. It was agreed that we'd start off with 2000 articles in the trial, starting with just a few and ramping up so that we'd hit the 2K articles around 2 weeks into the trial, with the expectation that if things went well, we'd add more incrementally, perhaps up to 10K; however, only a handful of administrators participated in adding articles to the trial, and I don't think we ever got above 1500. Further, at that point, we'd pretty well added all of the articles that were eligible under the criteria for the trial, except for ones in categories where one or more administrator had objected to inclusion; as best I can tell, their objections were based on the articles being honey pots for socks. I was one of the most active admins in adding articles to the trial, and I confess I sneaked in a pile of BLPs that technically didn't meet the criteria (they had been semi-protected in the previous 6 months and had fewer than 10 watchers). Indeed, one of the most telling factors on this trial was the fact that very, very few administrators appeared to be interested in using the tool as currently configured. I also note that the time that it has taken edits to be reviewed has continued to lengthen as time has gone on. A few weeks ago, I led a panel on the topic of Pending changes at the New York City Wiki-conference. Thanks to DGG, Becksguy and Jamesofur, who were also on the panel. That same day, keynote speaker Clay Shirky talked about the fact that once a culture is ""broken"", it is not able to rebound back to its prior state. In my own closing statement, I reflected on that comment, and wondered if pending changes might be the ""culture-breaker"" for Wikipedia and, if it was, whether or not that would be a good or bad thing. Certainly the manner in which this entire trial has proceeded has shown that there are some pretty huge differences in what people perceive as the way we do things around here. I don't think the pending changes software or its use will be the culture breaker, but the manner in which it is being integrated and promoted into the project might very well be. I am very considerably concerned that this pressure to keep a bit of trial software running has resulted in a level of divisiveness between good-faith Wikipedians from which the community may not recover. " +" And yes its very nice.Leave Me a Message Have a nice day ) " +" That is a matter of opinion, but with 4 blatantly wrong CSD tags out of 17 - nearly a 25% fail rate - you're not even in the game, let alone the ballpark. You are wielding CSD as a blunt instrument, tagging first and thinking about it later. It needs to be used much more as a surgical instrument. Furthermore, although you removed CSD tags in two cases, even after being told about here on this page, you have not gone back to the user talk pages and apologized and/or removed the CSD tags. No, we aren't discussing an attempt at perfection here; we are discussing competence and civility. You make a big point out of demanding civility from others posting on your talk page, but what you don't understand is that what you are doing is a pretty serious form of incivility. In addition to the CSD taggings, you are picking new articles and adding all sorts of problem tags to them instead of actually building content. Again, I ask you - instead of tagging articles, how about adding content to them? An example of a newly created article I did that with, Django Walker, was listed at DYK. When I first saw it, it was nominated for CSD. We are here to build an encyclopedia. Are you?  |  talk  " +I agree the enlisting of ministry would be a good idea, analogous to Michelle Lensink. See what I can do.192.43.227.18 +Removed parent categories. What's so unexceptionable about that ?! +YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT +Know your place If you vandalise any pages again, you will be blocked 86.12.129.2 +LOL-fagstar Are you and Queeftet still buttfucking each other? LMFAO +For the 2005 race, DARPA has said the course will be at most 175 miles. As for roads, because of environmental restrictions outside of their control (the desert tortoise for example), all or most of the course is over dirt roads. The course can and most likely will cross active roads. In last year's competition, one team was paused to allow a truck to cross the road. The only external control allowed (actually, its required) is a 3-way control, RUN, PAUSE, and STOP. If the vehicle is paused, the timer stops running for that team until they start running again. 12:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) +To what extent is realim compatible with modelling? +Happy New Year to you too! Yes, I did find the spider article interesting; I tidied it a bit and added more on the choice of name. +Good Call Whoever organized the external links - good call! +Why don't we put this matter up for arbitration and let others figure out the motivations for your edits both here and on the Sweetest Day page. After all, it is in the best interests of Wikipedia to determine whether or not industry is using Wikipedia for profit. +" I can see it, but how about other users? OK, i think field hockey is differ to football, which is very hard to get the best. Change the image in template and we can improve and improve again. Hopefully. f1 " +I didn't vandalise it you cockface! I just told you shut up and sit down. +Another mention, this timke as Hardy-cum-chorlton, in Beyond Our Ken from 1960. It seems that decade was the high-point [or nadir] for comic usage of the name. 86.12.129.2 +Also have a look at Talk:Main Page/Archive 74#American-centricity +" heh. Well, I (And all the Thomas articles) refer to just being there, and not doing anything to be a cameo. It's also pretty hard to find a reliable source saying that they cameoed in Season whatever. Since, I'm trying to revamp those articles with proper sources, and what not, I figured, hey, it's not like cameos are that notable, according to AMIB, Rob, TTN, and the rest of 'em, and I can see where they're coming from. Better off for a Wikia. Skeletal Soul teh Hedgie " +You seem to be under the impression that it is possible for an integer to simultaneously be an odd prime and contain a factor of 4, which confuses me to some extent, though i admit i do not have the background in mathematics most of you probably do.201.196.189.134 +I am coming to get you i know where you live and im going to come and rape you +Notability of 'terrorist attacks' you might find this interesting Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)#Notability of acts involving Political Violence (Revisted) +[corr. archive page numbers. ] +'Significant numbers' being about 5%. If you're interested in anything other than disruption you'll drop this. +" I think it should go under its own section, such as ""Soundtrack"" or ""Film score"" depending on what the film project prefers. " +/09] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Leslie_Roak&diff;=prev&oldid;=308530190 Another inappropriate edit summary 8/17 +that I am a big homo, and +You will now note that CorporateM changed the lede even though discussion had not completed and a user voiced support for your approach. +Mikhail Bocharov (singer) ( ) +" and ironically enough, the true answer really is ""yes""" +From Depleted Uranium in Urine of Soldiers by the WISE Uranium Project: Is DU more hazardous than natural uranium, since it contains contaminants such as uranium-236, plutonium-239, etc.? No. Depleted uranium used for bullets has been found to contain trace amounts of artificial radionuclides, such as uranium-236, neptunium-237, and plutonium-239. The presence of these radionuclides can be explained by contamination from recycling of spent fuel introduced in the manufacturing process; for details, see [Diehl 2002]. The radiation dose from exposure to such contaminated DU is only a fraction of a percent higher than from pure DU - and thus still is lower than from natural uranium; for details, see [Diehl 2001]. +Do not refactor my comments again. I have warned you on your talkpage. If you object to any of my comments feel free to file a report at th relevant noticeboard. +" Tagging article Economy of Bihar It came to my notice that you have marked Economy of Bihar as a Good article. The status of GA cannot be granted automatically without a formal WP:GAC. Kindly go through the assessment guides in the Assessment Page. Happy tagging. TALK2ME " +"I meant to do that last night but some stupid shit came up. Then I went and helped move furniture at the church. I came home and did not feel like reading until my friends started trying to scare me by calling my phone and saying stupid things and just purely breathing on it. Then they tried to come to my house and scare me but I went to their's and surprised the shit out of them. They came around the corner and went holy shit when they saw me and started running while I screamed run bitch at around 11 pm. I came home and just did small things on here. I'll read it today, I promise.C " +I would agree too if you could remove that word. It only makes him angrier, as you can see with his latest sockpuppet's user name. Cheers, +So, please back there and calmly ready to know the details of the discussion, before jumping to an conclusion. If you don't have the time or willingness to do so, please pass the case to someone who can! Yes it takes more then one editor to edit war. The talk page info I believe is not being replied to because its an incoherent wall of text - as is the info being added to the article. Would be best to post the changes on the talk page and ask for a copy edit of the info for proper English. I see your frustrated and it may be best to ask others to get involved see Wikipedia:Requests for comment its easy and fast. Sorry, but redirect to these templates definitively didn't help. Please, be practical in your resolutions, and not simply leave in the charge of the User, for him(her) turn around on confused templates, real walls of text, if you know what I mean... If they are easy for anyone already using them, I don't know. But they definitely are not fast; So, could you be more specific? +, 27 August 2007 (UTC) I just did a quick Google search; here are a few links you can study a bit . Maybe it does conform to the linguistic science afterall. P Anyway, I'm curious now what they speak in Mezzolombardo? take care. 18:47 +The content of BOONYARATVEJ is not copied from a dictionary, it is my surname and I am writing a biography on the origins of this surname which was given to us by the king of Siam. Please allow me time to complete the content before making judgement. +Why? Why does this event have its own page? 141.154.216.109 +So you say that mainstream agencies are worthless (could agree on that one)? Honestly, I don't care who gathered resources… I already stated that all those links provide valid and undisputed facts. If you click those links, you'll see that you just said how associated press, Reuters, Washington Post and so on... are not valid sources. Read what is provided, I haven’t addressed these issues, and I won't let go… Conspiracy is not a code word here, code word is TRUTH! +'ello! Do you like Oprah? Girl, you nasty! 95.247.163.50 +Photos Southwestern’s official website has many photos that are provided to the media. Does this mean the photos are open source and they can be posted on the Wikipedia site? +" Your Age You might want to rethink advertising your age. Not many people are going to take seriously some snot-nosed, wet-behind-the-ears punk kid. Don't be so insulting. You certainly act the age of a kid. Grow up will you. FireFox does a good job here. | talk Please also bare in mind: Wikipedia:No personal attacks. | talk I'm sure it's true - I bet he does make it harder on himself by letting everyone know how young he is. I know I'm a lot less likely to listen to some little kid with braces and zits on his face. Not that FireFox does, necessarily, but that's image a lot of people are going to have." +Galactus There's been a lot of speculation but footage has leaked confirming that Galactus is the final boss of Arcade mode (see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a72R8mokdNA). Should he be included with the rest of the roster but with a note that he is not playable? I don't know. +RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia There is currently a request for comments at Talk:The Gambia on whether to capitalize the definite article in the country name. Feel free to participate in the discussion. +" Done. The article is now posted to the main Wikipedia space (also known as the ""article space"") at John P. Healey. Good work. Talk " +VMORO Nationmaster is a website mirroring Wikipedia. As for the Factbook - Eurostat, the UN and the Bulgarian national statistics give completely different numbers for the population of Bulgaria as at 2005. So we are going to include five different numbers or what? Third of all, the Factbook does not state the number you keep posting - it is a number which you have calculated yourself. Thank you very much but estimates by Antidote have no place in any article here. It's quite evident you are engaged in trolling and there are many other users who notice that. +" Without qualification, the statement ""journalist Shane Richmond noted that Hattersley did not appear to have a Wikipedia biographical entry at the time"" makes any sense at all to the reader, when they are actually reading a biography of Giles Hattersley? The bigger glaring self reference would appear to be the implicit assumption that the reader has the first clue that this article has only existed for a few hours, or indeed would have the first clue how to find that out. " +REDIRECT Talk:Pharaoh's Advenure Park +New Warning Before making changes to the soap opera character pages, perhaps you should consult the Wikipedia Soap Project page where a consensus decision to eliminate the bottom of page lists has been reached. We are implementing the new Soap Opera Character infoboxes instead. Do not undo edits made by members of the project or your edits will be considered vandalism and a block could be put on your editing privledges. Thank you. +So you're going to hold it in your anus. OK. Bite me, asshole.68.172.52.21 +The first sentence in the article needs to be cleaned up. tildetildetildetilde +why are you being so mean +Article length Before we go and start removing massive portions of the article I think we should take into consideration that many nation articles are quite a bit past the 100kb. The article of Russia is definately long (222kb) and is an excellent article (even used by the wiki community as an example of a good article) even though it has long subsections and many images. Length dosent mean that it's a poorly put together article. This article can work as a long article (and will probably need to in order to explain the complexity of mexico) as long as we provide information which provides accurate representative information. +Oh, I didn't see the link you put. Sorry about that. — +For instance, I'm experiencing hard troubles when opening and editing this overloaded page, which I'm sure is the case with many other users of WP. +" Wikipedia:WikiProject_Drugs I need to start a project that automates factual changes/insertions (like rambot). A lot of incorrect information exists in or basic factual information is missing from drug related articles. This is stuff that can be easily looked up online and are basic scientific facts for which there is no argument over. The information can be found from several online drug databases including rxlist.com, medlineplus.gov, the official websites of drug manufacturers (they have free, detailed information sheets) and other various websites. I plan on writing a bot which can automatically 'rip' factual information (which is non-copyrightable due to its factual nature) and create an off-site database. I will offer this database for free for people to download, so both they and I can work on bots that can integrate the information in articles. This would require considerable collaboration with the drugs wikiproject people to provide a standard format for all drugs articles beyond the simplistic efforts taken so far so that I can ensure the bot will behave properly and insert information only in a correct manner. For clarity, this is information regarding side effects, [bio]chemistry, routes of administration, drug names (brand name and genericmy bot will autmoatically look up International Nonproprietary Name, USAN, BAN and other names) as well as other clearly factual things. A question needs to be raised regarding drug pages, how should they be organized? The full information sheets on drugs are very large and rather complicated from a lay person's perspective, perhaps it would make sense to integrate full infomration (including the results of studies on it) on a separate ""full information"" page while keeping the main page a summary? Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases Some of the SCOTUS articles (Lawrence v. Texas, Bowers v. Hardwick) have caught my interest and I may decide to do some bot automation with them also, but I'm not sure what yet. There are various large legal database websites available which I can legally rip information from in the same manner as with the drug project above. See also: Category:U.S. Supreme Court cases" +Hey Baby Boy, what's up with you???? Just thought I would send you another message to let you know I'm still around Baby Boy!! See ya later!!! +Right, it's done. I've moved the appropriate comments from this talk page to that one. +On the first point, the main articles for those movies have some production/development info; copying that over and then shortening it a little might work. - +List of political slurs I almost did that myself, but lacked cojones I guess. I wish there was a quick way to get a second admin opinion and just know that 2 pairs of eyes saw it and both said: speedy that sucker. Thanks +" Proterozoic Template Hello - looks like you created the Proterozoic template, very nice, but I was wondering if it would be possible to invert it so that the oldest part of the section is at the bottom? That is standard practice in geology and is more common in these charts, since it allows the visualization of the ""lower"" and ""upper"" parts of the column. I would do it but I don't think I'm smart enough with the syntax in these templates. If you have time, thanks in advance. Cheers " +I think it might be a good idea to get the page semi-protected, till the edits following Bianchi's death subside. +Dude! That was an attempt at saying something cool, but maybe I shouldn't have pointed that out, because now it doesn't quite look cool anymore. Damn! +db|my RIGHT to vanish +Hello Mr Ollie, you removed several links of me concerning continuous improvement methods like Lean and TOC. I am a journalist specialized in this methods, so these are not advertisements (I do not consultancy of any sort). +No need to tell me, you are under watch! +I met Bruce a few times and heard the same thing,he said he played session and live for them a few times but i can find no reference of him anywhere. +Online chat About list of software, please see Talk:Online_chat, thanks. - 213.115.160.72 +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Emma. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. fisto " +This isn't a shared IP and I don't know why it's been tagged as one. +This article was taken from part of the former article Historical weights and measures, which was move to Ancient weights and measures. As a result, some of the discussion & history for Mediaeval weights etc. may be found in Talk:Ancient weights and measures The reason for splitting the articles was simply size - over 41Kb. It is intended that these articles are closely linked. 17:12, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) +" Sandbox Your draft/copy of the article from your user page has been saved at (talk " +Knuckles real name is Fred. I know. he got drunk and told me. - note this is a Joke. Don't go writing in his article. +This paragraph should be taken out back and shot: #moeche: small green species crabs (Carcinus maenas), when they arrived at the peak of phase changes and then soft, they are fried. The moeche are very valuable because the process of changing the water brackish lagoons lasts a few hours, the armor back hard and immediately return to be called masenete +" It took four years to change the titles of 30 cities, and you don't think it would be disruptive to change tens of thousands? And worse yet, to argue about ""primary meaning"" and ""necessary disambiguation"" on thousands of talk pages? The ""good reason"" that is needed is a clear, non-arguable guideline, and that is what we have now. To make every single city a judgment call - what an enormous waste of Wikipedia time! Avoiding THAT situation is a ""good reason"". Consistency for the sake of consistency is not a ""good reason"". " +Thanks for your help.... I am not sure about the redirecting part, if I didn't do it right, please fix for me or instruct. I am still unclear, but I tried my best. Thanks for your suggestions.luckymama58 +"::::But.. Wikipedia is wisdom of the crowd. See this aricle: For Kendall Whitehouse, senior director of information technology at Wharton, the most interesting question is ""whether the wisdom of the crowd is ultimately a better approach compared to scholarly review and edited content."" As Whitehouse observes, ""Wikipedia's strength is that it has thousands of eyes looking at it. The hope is that errors will be quickly caught and corrected."".. Marketing professor Peter Fader notes that Wikipedia shows there is wisdom in crowds, but a better user rating system would filter out those who post bogus information. Joel Waldfogel, professor of business and public policy, agrees that much of the concern about Wikipedia is just a new spin on whether old media (printed encyclopedias, in this case) stand a chance against the new breed of instantly updatable online media. (quoted from article). In short, no matter what system you come up with here, it is going to be wisdom of the crowd, by design, that is what Wiki is. So you might as well design a system around that concept, go with the natural design of the system, work with it to all its advantages, not work against it and try to limit it with ""old media"" concepts. " +" Esperanza elections Have you considered running? I know I'm neutral but I've seen a lot of you about Esperanza and wondered if you've thought about it ;). Cel háblame " +, 6 October 2010 (UTC)|decline=I don't see any reason to believe anything you say. You knew you were edit warring, you've been blocked for it many times before, and you have promised not to do it again before. Wikipedia would be better off without this sort of behavior. I'll be watching you after this block expires, and I'm not as nice as the previous admins who have blocked you. 02:45 +Spoilers Just remember, the people in the United States haven't seen the movie yet. +Thank you for notifying me, but there seems to be no need to respond there. Woodzing likes his own photos a bit too much. Regards, / +Shadow DFD Team Can some one fix tahat table. Not sure how. +" I found this quote confusing ""all baptised Sikhs (Khalsa) must not wear a kirpan at all times[citation needed]."" I take it to mean ""must NOT"". My understanding was that the commandment was ""MUST"" Could someone please clarify this, and correct if appropriate." +Goodbye Everyone I am Blocked From Wikia However you can still see me on here like the loser that I am. Infact I am going to watch the page of 70.127.201.51 day and night now since I have no life. Why did you get blocked? +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Neurolysis. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Leave'''''' talk " +Something with my IP Hey Favre. I'm in a class right now, luckily able to message you to ask for some guidance on an issue with my IP. When trying to edit in my room, I am unable, as a pop-up appears saying that IP has been blocked for one month. I don't understand what that means. I don't even use my IP to edit. Could you please give me some guidance here? It says my IP was disrupting Wikipedia with vandalism. I'm sure I've never made a vandalistic edit, my last edit was one to Arkham Origins talk page. Am I being framed here? I'm getting some stress in my system. What can I do? - +" How is it original research? — " +"==Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam 2== A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam 2. NrDg " +Operation Ben Grimm There is an issue of Captain Savage and his Leatherneck Raiders entitled Operation:Ben Grimm which details the rescue of Marine Aviator named Ben Grim which predates Fantastic Four number 1 why is this not mentioned as Ben Grimm's first appearance? +Besides, you was defecate my image, for ex. the Grave of Vince Talabér. talk +Misattributed quote from Syngenta website good catch on the Syngenta quote. But in removing the quote, you also took all reference to a peer reviewed article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and a review by Australia's governmental agency regulating agricultural chemicals, which was not necessary for addressing the problem you identified. I restored these, replaced the faux quote with one from the actual source document, and reduced the breadth of the claim describing the quote. +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +Please delete this users' talk page and all content/history on it. Thank you. +As for precedent, many Featured Articles only use the article title in the header: Anton Chekhov, Wail al-Shehri, Shahbag, Darjeeling, IIT KGP, Ghandi, Simeon I of Bulgaria, Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, Anastasia Nikolaevna, etc. These articles are considered to be of the highest quality, so we should follow their normal practice. +Ageo020's response Hey PS Yes, you are right. I have not lived in Kerala in the past 2 years. That doesn't mean I am not familiar with it. Now Amrita TV is not a TV channel watched by the masses. They watch Surya, Asianet or Kairali. If you have been seen on this channel, it means to me in my biased opinion that you are not too famous to have an article in wikipedia. Also remember that there are many singers who have cut their own records. That doesn't mean they have to have an article too. Plus I am a frequent listener to malayalam film songs and I have certainly not heard of you. Do not waste your time ranting about whether the article should be deleted or not. Instead focus your energy on singing and becoming famous and then having someone else to have an article written about you. This letter may make you more angry, but I am sorry. Ave +" Personal attacks in edit summaries Hello, IllaZilla. I do not particularly care if you want to attack me in edit summaries, as you did here - I'm a man in his thirties (like you), and I just shrug at this kind of stuff. In a way I even enjoy it. But do be aware that not everyone has this attitude, so it might be best to keep ""kindergarten stuff"" and similar comments out of edit summaries. OK? " +" Speedy deletion of ""Siennasol"" A page you created, Siennasol, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. " +Hey!!! Do not remove messages on HamishMacBeth page or be banned! +This is where Pgagnon999 started with a threat to report someone to their system admisinstrator. With regard to Middletown, Connecticut, your removal of the Neutrality tag constitutes conflict of interest as your IP address is a state website. If you would like to dispute the tag, please open a discussion on the talk page for the article. Otehrwise, you'll end up on the Wiki list of organizations/ agencies that self edita pretty embarassing place to be. This is where he was engaged in further activity to intimidate a poster: Also interesting is a history of edits from user at the Connecticut gov. (Middletown gov?) state IP address and a seemingly related Wesleyan Univeristy IP. Pgagnon999 (talk) This vicious and underhanded behavior is threatening and abusive. He does not engage in civil behavior, he deletes QUOTED material and then posts garbage from lame sites that support his narrow and partisan beliefs. -That's nasty behavior. And astonishing to me that you support him in it. He's pushing point of view, he's violated neutrality, he's deleted referenced material, he's certainly does not assume good faith. I mean, he's out there attacking people and all but terrorizing them. And that's the guy you've put your support behind. Great. +These are news articles.'''''' +book with greek bedside story's +. Did Windley contact Rocketdyne? no he didnt, and its funny how he included Jarrah White in his false propaganda. Now, lets hear from someone who actually contacted Rocketdyne - Jarrah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyzlZkTwYRo Bill Kaysing - the service engineer 91.145.38.53 +"* The Russian idiom ""to let the he-goat into the kitchen-garden"" (in original: “пустить козла в огород”) is the best way to describe what’s going on in the editing of Earthquake engineering article now. The “truck farmer” there, " +Hey man whats up? Im kinda lonely will u help me get started on wiki? +"==Back F.C.== Sorry, but the article doesn't meet notability criteria. ''''''  " +AfD nomination of The Catch (2008) An article that you have been involved in editing, The Catch (2008), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catch (2008). Thank you. Endless Dan +Nevermind. I found out the CASB is the former name of the current Transportation Safety Board of Canada. 20:52, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) +St. Joseph NHS of Batangas NEVER TOPPED the NAT. Please be factual in editing entries here in wikpedia. maybe you are from that school that is why you replace LOPE DE VEGA NHS on top place shame on you! +" Did you see the VMA'S I never thought fat joe was going to come out with something, ""I never felt so protected... security courtesy of G-Unit."" that was funny, right after 50 performed, he called fat joe a pussy boy and almost seem like he wanted to cry. this is turning out to be some crazy sh*t." +Just what do you think I should be blocked for? Disagreeing with you? As for discussing on the talk page, I moved the disputed content to the talk page exactly so it could be discussed without the edit warring. That edit war was not my doing, and I was only the most marginal participant in it. It was you who ignored my try at ending the edit war by returning the same disputed content to the lead. All that is disputed is the adding that content to the lead. No one has questioned its presence it the article in its proper place. +" Hey there, I seen that you are a native German speaker and I wonder whether you can please help me and translate the following sentence to English, objectively as possible: ""Mögen wir zehnmal von Juden abstammen und ich im Princip noch so sehr für Gleichberechtigung der Hebräer sein, im socialen Leben sind mir Christen lieber ..."" Best217.132.230.146 " +I undid Ahunt's revision, because the article mentions the GPPC's activities, and more importantly, because the page of the web site http://www.gatineauparc.ca/home_en.html provites a referenced article illustrating the point made in the Wiki sentence. +":You are correct, and in fact, the entire phrase shouldn't be in there - it's just puffery by one guy - a friend of his. It's laughable. Let's see numerous people say that he is a ""Renaissance man"". " +I stop being a Jew and pay for decent Internet access via Google Fibre +" Sorry to eavesdrop, but are you sure third-party sites are reliable sources for WWE results? That notion sounds a bit absurd knowing that these third-parties get their information from a fourth-party, and they have no way to confirm what they're reporting to be true. I have read a lot of errors on some third-party results; they could be as minimal as mixing up the moves used in a match, but the reality is that mixing up at least something usually happens in all these results pages. How and why do you consider these to be reliable enough to reference our Wikipedia articles? '''''G (talk)''''' " +im getting mad You had best stop harrasing me. You know that that stupid information isnt needed on that or wanted so stop waisting my time. +SarekOfVulcan RFA Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly. See you around the wiki! +Robbie Hummel Way to speedy delete my Robbie Hummel article! It's now a real article and you can't do anything about it. I can't believe you would do this to me. You must hate black people. +Please cool down. Where did I accuse you of vandalism? As to why I reverted you, I just put in an explanation. Thanks! +Brandon Sanderson articles Hello, I looked again at the changes and have left the Stormlight Archive article as you left it. After looking at the detailed spren info and thinking about it, I agree it doesn't need to be there either. I restored most of the Way of Kings content (though kept the back cover prophecy removed as suggested). The other restored information felt important (especially the character info). I put most of the audiobook info back in as you had it though. I hope this is a reasonable compromise. +Suicide Are any details known about his death? It would certainly add to the article.- +Removed link to website This website http://www.pazsaz.com/kkat.html Krazy Kat Cartoons from the 1960s - A list of Krazy Kat cartoons in full-colors. Was listed and it's full of pop up windows and spammy links. It may be a good source but it'll open a lot of pop up windows before you get to it and that'll crash your computer. So I moved it to the reference page so if someone wants to see the list they can but be forwarned of the pop up ads 66.99.3.100 eric +Image of Navion Hi, I'm Francesco from Italy, I wanted to use the image: L17PWM046_WIKI.jpg from the Navion page into the italian wikipedia, but I can't do it since it is not on commons, but only on the english wikipedia image repository. Since you ar ethe author of the Image, I would like to ask you if you can upload it in the common site (To share that nice image among all the other wikipedia). Thank in advance. +"Hip-Hop Is NOT Dead But Ready To ""Get It""!!! (Calif) Hip-hop producer and west coast native E. Re-ill debuts his album “Get It”. “Get It” is the representation of E. Re-ill's mindset, ""I'm in a place in my life where I need to become who I am... I got to “Get It”!!! says E. Re-ill. “Get It” is an album that when focused on can bring out the drive in you to make your dreams real. Why you may ask? You need three things to achieve your goals Hope (expectations), Hustle (drive) and Hunger (appetite for success). These three mindsets are displayed in this album which accompanied by your dreams this will enable your inner being to ““Get It”!” E. Re-ill has been producing beats since the late 80's, influenced by Dr. Dre (and who isn't), Rick Rubin, performed with many stars, and has participated in great projects. A prior and classic venture was with the street-ball company Y.P.A. and the DVD titled ""The War"". E. Re-ills’ most rememberable time in making music is when N.W.A. was filming the classic controversial video ""Straight Outta Compton"" E. Re-ill's older brother caught the attention of Ice Cube and filmed Ice Cube telling E. Re-ill to keep up and he'll see him on top!!! That statement would drive E.Re-ill for many years. Hip-Hop has always been the “in touch with your inner voice” music and then we have always informed our community of how we see the actions displayed in front of us. Hip-Hop can be fun, dark, and everything in between. However, usually no matter the topic a hip-hop song it should captivate you!!! “Get It” is no exception to this, “Get It” displays emotional drive, creative sound packages, consistent vibe and sounds, and arguably some of the best lyrics delivered on hip-hop tracks in a long while. Songs like ""Dark People"" a description of pushing your self to great heights even when life shorts you of opportunities. ""I'm So Gangsta"" is a nice surprise!!! It is Fresh Caesar's look at the world biggest gangsta George Bush, and his fumbles with war and Katrina!!! Don't cheat yourself I'm so Gangsta is a necessary download!!! Oakland native and a brilliant lyricist Fresh Caesar (a.k.a. Omega) is currently working on his own album titled ""Jack London’s Square"". Fresh Caesar displays lyrical strengths of Nas and Jay-Z with a west coast flavor delivery. Fresh Caesar displays great lyrical ability and is definitely not your average rapper on the mic. Down South/Oakland rapper, Tom-E-Gunn has the sounds of Snoop Dogg's early gangsta swag with grit of the south. These songs are actually lost demos recently found. E. Re-ill felt compelled to use the demos for the world to hear due to their strong delivery of life experiences. E. Re-ill's “Get It” album is about all the aspirations that we desire in life money, success, respect, reflections of life, and excess of women and parties. This is the start of great things to come from this talented producer. iTunes search E.Re-ill (no spaces), Contact: myspace.com/ereill1 Also available on rhapsody, emusic, napster, Amazon..." +":Kitty - I will do that when I get a ""round tuit."" I also think a paragraph about Ohio's John Fowler is in order. " +You should seriosly look into reading and applying it yourself. +You don't have to do anything I suggest. However, since you are among the youngest editors, your age will get people not to take you seriously. +hi who is this 65.7.162.38 +You deleted (among many others) a sentence with two sources, stating that Feminist Africa is the first continental African gender studies journal. The sentence is an obvious justification for notability and the sources were valid. You've deleted all sources that speak positively of the journal but left in a piece of criticism. The article meets the guidelines specified in the style guide you provide—and this style guide is furthermore no reason to limit information about the social importance of a journal. I don't work for Feminist Africa and the article as it stands is not fluff or PR. Your edits are truly baffling to me and I cannot see what purpose they serve. +" Talkback WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 " +ediot if i find you on street i will kick ur ass +Mariusz is still blocked. When he gets back, he'll probably yell at for blocking him. — +There are elements of Federalism contained in the South African provincial system. For example there is National legistation regulating the Liquor Industry and each Province has its own legislation that is compatable with that legislation. Gauteng was however one of the first provinces to ammend its Liqour legislation while the essence of the old Act was still applied in the other provinces. Kwazulu-Natal was one of the main proponents of the Federal System at the time of going to the elections in 1994. In fact the Inkhata Freedom Party were withholding their participation from that election process virtually untill the last minute for reasons that included the Federal Issue. +The disambiguation page had two links, both of which linked to the same article. It therefore wasn't doing any disambiguating. +User:Creed7 I think it was a joke, albeit not a very funny one... Snowman +Actually, it's not clear, as she never says she is bisexual. +" Boy, this is classic: Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Brilliant reasoning there, MastCell and Nightscream. I wonder how people 20 years from now will read this without laughing their ass off. 69.45.178.143 ""Duesberg doesn't conduct research on HIV. He never has. Neither does Kary Mullis. Neither does the Perth Group."" ""Russian biologists don't conduct research on Michurinism. They never have."" ""Evolutionists don't conduct research on Intelligent Design. They never have."" ""Einstein doesn't conduct research on the photoelectric effect or Brownian motion. He never has."" 69.45.178.143 ""In 1948, genetics was officially declared 'a bourgeois pseudoscience'; all geneticists were fired from work (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued."" (from Wikipedia aritlce Lysenkoism). 69.45.178.143 '''''I THINK MAST CELL AND NIGHTSCREAM'S ""ARGUMENT"" OVER THE POV OR NON-POV NATURE OF THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ""AIDS REAPPRAISAL"" IS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT IS AS FOLLOWS (PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS CENTRAL TO THE POV-NON-POV DEBATE, NOT A DEBATE OF ""THE ISSUE"", MAST CELL): Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Mast Cell and Nightscream are using this pathetic ""argument"" as a justification for pushing their POV. So, yes, this comment IS very definitely in reference to ""improving the article"". THANK YOU. 69.45.178.143 " +1998 Australian Touring Car Championship Out of curiosity, where did you do your research? +" That's pretty cool. Thanks a bunch! [[WP:EA|e]] (Talk)[[Special:Contributions/Tvaughn05|(Contribs)]] " +. Also the Ip is dyanmic for some reason it changes daily, so it will only give me a 24 hour block, while other people suffer for nothing. 1 EDIT, does not create a 6 month block!!!. Shorten please. +hi Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. -) +I'm Glad I Removed My Fear Of The Orange Bar Thanks for your birthday message -) Don't worry, i'll be around, one way or another. I just needed some time to get some perspective. +Feel free to make changes as I have only included active drivers as it is intended for. +Also, in the citation provided, those countries he mentioned as western were countries we already knew of. He didn't exclude Latin America and the West Indies (meaning we shouldn't either). Tom72.185.162.37 +" Pardon me, but I believe my objection is more fundamental than you guys think. Google video is this site, right? According to the website, anyone (including me) can upload videos onto the site. Do you agree so far? Ok then, if I can simply upload a video, I can also call it ""Dispatches - Undercover mosque"". Correct? Now how do we know that whoever uploaded that video and called it ""Dispatches - Undercover mosque"", uploaded the real video, and not a fake or modified one? It appears that users are being offended at the fact I'm asking a question. This is completely unnecessary. I don't want to offend anyone, but only want them to answer my questions. " +Strawberry Swing As an editor with a history of personal attacks and of creating attack pages, I disagree that it wasn't appropriate. +" November 2010 (UTC)|decline=You are attempting to impersonate and harass another editor. | Penny for your thoughts? 00:10, 23" +Eli is not a crack whore and works the streets for money. if you want him go the the burbs and yell out two headed white bitch raper. +I've stubbed the article. It would probably be best to continue this discussion on the article's talk page. - +Reply: In addition to your poor copy, unnecessary quoting and not sourcing a quote, it's also not established that this is notable. +" Pregnancy image duplicate Can you shut down this duplicate RFC that was opened immediately after an identical RFC was closed? Many editors feel this is not only out of process, but an actual abuse of process. Thanks! ☥ " +"::Small change? It's completely different. Sfacets " +" Please don't spam Wikipedia. I've added you to my watch list and any further spamming will simply be reverted, equating to nothing more than a waste of your time and mine. Thank you. " +In all fairness to the article and to it's accuracy shouldn't this be noted? +First of all I received no such message. 2nd, if an edit is met with revert, you simply do not revert, you take it to a talkpage. Saying that your edit was IMOS tells me nothing. An edit summary telling us how this article applied to IMOS would of been more helpful. Show me any of the discussions you have started? +AKC Suspensions The Morning Call - Feb 24, 2001 72.228.151.208 +Thanks Thanks for fixing the move.. ) - +A lot depends on how the various companies have set themselves up financially. Companies that have committed themselves to buy feedstock or wafers at high prices for the next several years are going to have bigger problems than those who have some flexibility in their contracts, for example. It will also depend on how their lines are set up on how reliant they are on manual labor (on cell production lines at large manufacturers I think you will find little reliance on manual labor in either country). But regardless, a tariff would push PV prices up just as they're finally beginning to come down. I don't that's a good idea. I also don't think it would have the desired effect. I don't have any figures on how much PV the US imports from China, but some 3.5% of US PV exports go to China. Furthermore, the US is still a net exporter of PV modules so for a tariff to have the desired effect I think it would have to be levied by some other government that is more significant to the Chinese PV industry. +You're not assuming good faith. I read the article the day the movie came out, so I was unaware of the correction. I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie. Furthermore, my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate. I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view. But something being a minority view doesn't make it an incorrect view or vandalism. If you disagree with me, you can reword my blurb to your liking, but to call it vandalism is petty. +Check the map on the right, or here, or here... +Question How can I nominate an article for deletion? +" Unofficial re-review by Sasata At the request of the original nominator, I've having a look at the article again after changes have been made. Referencing is now much better than before. I've condensed a couple of repeating citations. I still believe the article needs to follow standard Wikiformat, including a lead, and division of text into sections, with appropriate headers. The argument that the article is not long enough to warrant separate sections highlights one of the article's deficiencies—it doesn't give sufficient coverage to the information out there. A search of the ISI Web of Knowledge Academic Database pulls up 76 research articles (dating from 1991-2009), but only a tiny fraction of these are cited in the article. Here are some research studies that I would expect to be cited in this article: Thorson RM. (1993). ""Postglacial offset along the Seattle fault"". Science 260(5109): 825–826. Discusses data that confirms Holocene movement along the fault. Karlin RE, Abella SEB. (1996). ""A history of Pacific Northwest earthquakes recorded in Holocene sediments from Lake Washington"". Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth 101(B3): 6137–6150. Gives a geohistorical perspective on the fault and discussion of the secondary effects that may have been caused by the fault. Dewberry SR, Crosson RS. (1996). ""The M(D) 5.0 earthquake of 29 January 1995 in the Puget lowland of western Washington: An event on the Seattle fault?"" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(4): 1167–1172. Analyses a 5.0 magnitude earthquake 25 km south of Seattle that is most certainly germaine to this article. Thorson RM. (1996). ""Earthquake recurrence and glacial loading in western Washington"". Geological Society of America Bulletin 108(9): 1182–1191. Effects of glaciation/deglaciation on earthquake recurrence and its effects on current paleoseismic approaches to determine recurrence frequency. I could go on (and on), but I think you get the point. There's a lot of research out there that hasn't been touched on in this article, and for that reason, it doesn't meet criteria 3(a) (""it addresses the main aspects of the topic""). I think if you were to address some of this research, the size of the article would swell up and section divisions would suggest themselves naturally. And with section headers and beefed-up text, image placement is much easier. I'm not a fan of the outgoing links. For example, when I click on the outbound link (... local native legends) I expect to be led to a page which discusses specifically the a'yahos legend, but instead end up on a general site about Indian legends and earthquakes. Perhaps the a'yahos legend is somewhere in one of those links, but I shouldn't be expected to hunt around for it myself. If there is a specific page which discusses a'yahos, then link to it directly, and use a web citation template. If not, then this outbound link should be in the external links section (or perhaps left out completely). Similar arguments apply to the outbound link for Lidar-based mapping that appears later. I shouldn't have to go to an external site to find a definition that helps me understand the wiki article. I hope this helps you on your quest to get this article to GA status. Good luck! " +December 10, 2005 I was changing the Format for the List of Connecticut Governors so that it may match the other Lists of US Governors. This was not vandalism. +Image:Ailynpassionbooklet.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ailynpassionbooklet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +Please can you stop this viscous victimisation. +That play wasn't spectacular, it was just ok just like any other homerun robbing play. The only reason people are hollering 187 on that thing was because of the perfect game, otherwise it would be just another play. The catch WAS NOT SPECTACULAR!!!! 75.77.27.50 +You're a twat and a Jew, have a nice day! +BTW India has no need for God. it needs G-d to save it from this recervation stuff.That's MY opinion. Standards have fallen like absolute crazy since the 50% quota was introduced in IIT. +" For you The Citation Barnstar For your initiative in creating the sources archive. n☯mi " +Thanks . The talk page is a lost cause - an exercise in futility. There's a pit bull who guards it. (My new name comes from the source of this effort.) - +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bishop Eustace Preparatory School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " +A page you started (Citysuper (supermarket)) has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Citysuper (supermarket), PalaceGuard008! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Hi, This Article 'citysuper (supermarket)' does not have any issue. Nice work To reply, leave a comment on Deepanshu1707's talk page. Learn more about page curation. +" Heads Up ANI discussion in which you're mentioned. Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#JJJ999. Just to ley you know!  Chat  " +Hello. I have removed the Speedy Delete template from your user page. It was intended to go on the main space page. Sorry. +Reply I wouldn't post your phone number on Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are mirrored on MANY other websites, and your number may become very public very quickly. By the way, how old are you? (Talk) (Contribs) () +how i can read the books on wikepedia +YOU STILL SUCK What did you do, report me? I don't care. Do it again. Get me blocked. I want to be blocked. I hate you. Get a life. +" The Signpost: 31 December 2014 Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe 1964 Constitution of Afghanistan: Preamble It's already at wikisource:Constitution of the Kingdom of Afghanistan. Should I nominate it for deletion without redirect? I just redirected to 1964 Constitution of Afghanistan; seems like the simplest solution. Maybe some of them could be expanded one day if there was significant commentary on any portion of the constitution (a la Second Amendment). I know pretty much zero about Afghan law and doubt that they would realistically expanded, who knows though. " +As there are not enough sources citing Hed PE as performers of heavy metal music, I have removed the project template from this page. ( ) +Welcome! Hello, Ameliabicknese, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +I dare you try to blcok ME the best of them all. I know where you live ha ha ha. +because vain they do not start to burn thread +" AudeVivere, you have blocked my account and did not block the other users account for the same offenses. First, he attacked and I included the attack in the discussion we had and second, I have been editing the article and not just reverting it. There were at least 3 edits in between the reverts I made and he made ""NO"" edits yet I am blocked. Either Block both parties, remove my block, or offer some explanation as to why his attack during his revert ""22:18, August 9, 2006 (hist) (diff) Scholars for 9/11 Truth (bullshit. This is not Fetzer's webspace and verbatim reproduction of his POV will not be allowed.) "" is acceptable." +children, nobody is better than anybody else – we’re all equal +" If they were a ""self-appointed organisation"" how would that explain the fact that they are directly involved with designing the national flags of British territories? - " +"Concerning the Article: ""Hinayana Buddhism From Wikipedia"" as a note: In Thailand, where the National Religion is Theravada Buddhism, the National Museum, in its display concerning the history of the Kingdom of Thailand (specifically the Sukkhothai and Ayutthaya periods), makes a very clear distinction between Theravada and Hinayana Buddhism listing it as a seperate religion (along with Mahayana Buddhism and Christianity)that was at times under the patronage of the King. It would appear that the Thai Hierarchy of Buddhism has no confusion concerning the use of this term." +I believe, since the category was in a template when it was updated, it may take a few days for it to update. John Reaves +" Harassment by Appletrees declared in 15 April 2008. You regret? www That's a good one. You visit here with the ID as I'm getting to almost forget this matter. Your appearance always draw my attention back to the ancient history of Japan. Yeah, I'm studying it hard. I have to take a nap, so see yeah soooooooooon And, this Korean is repeating harassment to the ancient history of Japan. 1. ""百濟國主照古王 以牡馬壹疋 牝馬壹疋 付阿知吉師以貢上"" The document of this China was rewritten to an opposite meaning by . The meaning of ""貢上"" is ""dedicated"".However, he rewrote ""dedicated"" in ""granted"". The meaning of ""granted"" is ""下賜"". did a similarly wrong translation, and ruined Imperial House of Japan. said. the 30th Japanese emperor Bidatsu was also a Korean. The section has many potential to be expanded indeed, so what is your rationale? He translated ""大原真人 出自謚敏達孫百済王也"". (Quotation 新撰姓氏録) into ""大原真人 is Korean emperor(百済王) Bidatsu(敏達)'s grandchild"". Of course, Appletrees's translation is completely wrong. A correct translation is ""大原真人 is a descendant of the grandchild ""百済王"" of emperor Bidatsu(敏達)"". 2. Korean civilization ""The Encyclopedia of World History: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern"" P56 is being written. Via these Korean contacts, Japan opened her doors to continental culture and Chinese civilization. This also enabled direct contacts with China. And, ""JapaneseHistory.info"" is being written. Chinese and Korean immigrants played an important role in introducing Chinese civilization to early Japan. Though a Korean civilization was not written at all, He rewrote, ""A Korean civilization introduced the culture to Japan"". often misinterprets the source. For instance Shakuhachi ""Diplomatic and cultural exchanges between Chinese continent and Japan being common, we can think that this flute was introduced in Japan with other musical instruments that were intended to give entertainments at the court (Gagaku; court music)."" This source is not writing Korea at all. However, he rewrote it. ""The bamboo flute first came to Japan from China via Korea. The shakuhachi proper, however, is quite distinct from its Chinese and Korean ancestors, the result of centuries of isolated evolution in Japan. " +Well I am not a sockpuppet. Any conclusion based on IP address, I would appreciate in e-mail form as I find it highly suspicious. I have been the sole user of this computer since perhaps August or September, and if someone else is accessing my machine it would be a violation I need to be made aware of. If someone could contact David Gerard for me and ask him to forward me this information it would be most helpful. (PowWow) +Oops, now I am in the position to say that the grouping (applied now to the article) looks unfamilar, at least from the German point of view ;-). Medicine would be sorted not as a profession, but as a natural science, including neurobiology and psychatry, and mathematics (and computer science) wouldn't be counted as natural science (but maybe as science). Can someone else please tell if these scheme is US POVed to them, too? 22:20, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) +" Considering the term ""Clan"" as a name for an online gaming team originated from NetMech (AFAIK), YES. Too bad I can't help writing it... " +eye for an eye also see WP:MOTIVATION +"__TOC__ July 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cobra " +resp. with context here +" I want to call attention to fact that I was the one who recieved a negative comment first from every editor I talked to. I have the will and ability to work in a Wikipedia-like enviorment, but that's only if they don't revert everything I write. Please notice, I never called editors ""Nazis"", what I said was, ""...you've left me unconvinced that wikipedia is run by responsible, caring, fair people; instead I'm starting to get the feeling that wikipedia is run like Nazi Germany..."". Also, ""...so a murderer who escapes police for a day is no longer a law breaker and charges should not be filed because it was in the past. Is that what you're suggesting is the moral of this story?..."", as an alternate version of , ""...so a vandal who escapes admin for a day is no longer a vandal and disipline should not be given because he did it in the past...?"". You've talked about your accusations that I've gone over the top yet I've gotten negative reaction from every person I've spoken here to, except MataNui44. What's more, they always gave me sarcastic comments before I did anything to them. I have constructively, and objectively tried to discuss it with your buddies up here but since they didn't have the facts, they didn't help or do anything positive. You may unblock me, anytime. 76.95.66.209 " +" Question about your userpage ""On Wikipedia, fair use image reversal finds every article!"" Is this some sort of In Soviet Russia joke, or does it have a serious meaning that I've missed? Talkback please if you reply here. " +Private messages. I don't know why you are leaving hostile notes on my talk page, but I suggest you approach admin if you have an issue with me, as I have no wish to communicate with you in the form of private messages. If indeed it is necessary to relay issues in this way, I will be sure to express my issues with you, on your talk pages also. In particular, you were quick to intercede with condemnation of me, when I was addressing a poster who chose to quote me erroneously, in a pointed exchange targeting me. I do not smile at such behaviour. Now if you had also acted as some kind of arbitrary neutral, then maybe your words to me would have some credence. As it is, you ignore my issues and simply seek to valid other peoples. Go to admin if you have an issue with me, as I have no friendship or reason to trust you. I have a long list of recorded incidents where people have acted outside of wikiguidlines toward me, and I will continue to record these issues for that hearing. If its necessary to relay issues personally, I am happy to play note tennis with you. If it is not, then by all means, talk to someone else about it, as in lieu of friendship or any show of common respect, etiquette or civility on your part, we literally have nothing to say. Thank you. +" Stop reverting! When the proper name of a piece of work uses a capitalized ""To"", then the article should be capitalized. If you read closely, it says that this exception can be made to titles that are ""unique"". it is the same as YOU wanting your username to not be capitalized, despite Wikipedia guidelines. If you continue to revert all my pages for ridiculous reasons, I will request mediation which will eventually lead to Arbitration. You need to get a life and stop obsessing over things that you're wrong about." +FYI, people do not even take Wikipedia serious. I just thought you should know. I on the other hand proved myself years ago. Furthermore, it was I, MRS VIANEN, who prompted that the page should be deleted. I insisted on that, as the page was about me and somebody published it years ago and I didn´t even bother to expand it. But I did work my butt off year after year and I have a sold track record to prove such. Also, you nor your colleagues are even able to determine what is what, in terms of claims of significance or notability, because I published my articles in another language, not in English. And you deleted the proof of such. No matter what authentic proof other that those already presented on said page, it would just be confusing to you and your kind. We do not speak the same language. Period. Eraser of Stalker Edits +Took out the part of him being on Lil' Wayne's Carter 3. Chris is nowhere to be found on the album +hola hola my little australian friend. I am looking forward to having you visit my third cousin off the coast of scandinavia. Mexico has been cold lately. Yesterday we got 78 inches of snow. It was FUN!!! See you in scandinavia +" Yes, it never says anything about soap. However, it may be considered advertiseing by puting his positions on the page. Sorry for the misunderstanding.Coldplay Expért Let's talk " +" Template Regarding your recent edits, please note that Bone is mainly a comic book series and not a computer and video games one.Φtalk? " +about the armking vandal ive noticed he has been back latly perhaps you should add him to the long term abuse page?if that isnt warranted yet id apprecicate it if you would at least clear up that armcheeseh and armhaed be added to the possible sock puppet list ive observed they use similar teqniuques to cause havoc on wikipedia. Not tomention the naming pattern matches up. I feel obligated to point this out to you as i am a concerned wikicitizen. -Micheal Mathews +well done Claviere, took you long enough! +I realised that its good use and then reverted my edits to your talk page. see my old edit and revert . I donno what is hinking yet ) as for campa cola i left a message for spammers which should solve problem in long term. +" The White Tree incident In your article concerning this incident you list that there were 2 nooses found on the tree. However, most news websites claim there were 3 nooses (CNN and The Toronto Star) Apparently the reason some people are so eager to claim it was two nooses rather than three nooses is because traditionally, in the Klan, the hanging of three nooses stands for ""K - K - K."" The timeline published by the Jena Times—which uses much non-neutral wording—says that there were two nooses. My default assumption would be that a newspaper is a reasonable and generally NPOV source. From it's own website, the Jena Times appears to be small operation (primarily by writer/editor/publisher Sammy J Franklin since January 1, 1968). Does anyone know more about Franklin, the paper's past, and/or its position in the community? — • TALK • It should also be noted that washington claims there is no relation between the noose incident and the attack. source: http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=80&pid;=&sid;=1254410&page;=2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.86.92 " +US credit union connection? http://www.google.hr/search?q=Ivo+Sanader+Croatian+%22Federal+Credit+Union%22+-wikipedia gives me practically nothing. It's true that this credit union failed but I don't see anyone other than anonymouses on Wikipedia mentioning Sanader. WP:BLP policy clearly applies... +" LOL! That's brilliant. Classic pseudoscientific gobbledygook at its best. Thanks for the laugh. Do you have any thoughts about the ""doctrine of signatures"" being a key concept in homeopathy? " +BUT this is exactly what you've done countless times Blanket Rev everything! +" Most of the version you have mentioned has been included now as it is quite well presented and makes the subject coverage wider Len☤ " +The mute was created for the jaguar. +Done based on your request on your talk page. I've added (and added a , too) in the hope of someone translating the stub of an Italian article and adding it to the one sentence that we have here. More will be needed, but it is already superior to the version I saw claiming Conti to be a former president of Italy. It no longer looks like a hoax. 147.70.242.54 +I was describing the article as submitted. There is not enough content for this article to be accepted in its current state. The article cannot be accepted without references to reliable 3rd party sources. While English sources would preferred, others will be okay as long as they meet wikipedia's standards for reliability. +Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. +" Regarding edits made during April 20 2007 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. – " +Muniz For the second time, I have deleted Kelly B. Muniz from the list. Neither the list nor Google offer any evidence warranting Muniz’s inclusion on the list. +It's at User:Bejnar/Faizal Ismail. +According to [National-Bolshevik Party] the NBPs are not officially branded extremist. Just because you personally feel they are extremist, doesn't give you broad latitude in editing articles accordingly. +ohhh....i slept right through it! ta +seeming boo boo in the derivations +Indeed, best to just ignore this, because there's a high chance this will get reported again. +" Governors of Tamil Nadu Nicholas, I have been updating List of Governors of Tamil Nadu page for the past few days. Can you please take a look and let me know if it is FL material. Thanks, " +"I would like to mention that you made the rather blatant sexual and violent yourself so if you want to call the police for sending ""sexually harassing messages"" to yourself, be my guest. My original message (which was, admittedly, not very civil itself and I do apologize) was quite different. It can also be grounds for a block yourself. (I'm also rather amused by this formerly congratulatory comment being removed.) " +Actually, there is plenty current stuff here. And I wasn't refering to current comments anyway, future ones. +"==September 2008== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Your test is here. Shiny!/Oohhh! " +Blotto adrift - admit when you make a mistake. Several other users have pointed out corrections and you still change the pages back to your edits. You and people like you are a shame to wikipedia. ps - if you were a scholar, which your not - but somehow are allowed to edit, again going to the creditablity of this site - you would have access to scholars portal. +Problems with drugs so they went with Nick Stahl instead. +Look at the freaking image page, and the cited ISBNs. Try google-searching for once in your life. The manga did not start its first English publication in 2004. Gwern (contribs) 19:13 28 January 2012 (GMT) +Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. +" The content you're adding is promotional in tone, making the article read like an ad. I see nothing valuable about adding where the information desk is; every mall has one except maybe a few really dead ones. Nor do I see any value in listing the bus stops as those usually can't be sourced. Malls are common places for bus stops. and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) " +German Sadchenkov Russian version?))) look that https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 +This is not a forum. If no explanation is given by the writers, then asking the question here is pointless. +Message Is there a way to PM you about an issue involving an editor and sockpuppeting that I noticed? I don't want to start posting my issue here so that they or anyone else can see. +ANI Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. +And I don't understand what you try to tell me. So shut up and don't change my contributions!!!! +And I repeat my question to you: Did you check the references? +an upstate-NY holiday today Hi, Brock. Happy Hot dog day!! Also you might enjoy the Dutch Hoag article I wrote recently. +" If none of them are linked/transcluded to any other article, then there won't be any problem with deleting them. Have fun deleting ) ''''''(talk) " +Binksternet Your are a Racist who is afraid of the true Latino and Chicano History of the Bay Area and keeps erasing it. +" HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE Wishing a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee " +|Another editor should be blocked as well +I can't writte to the article page!!! {{Infobox zoo |zoo_name=Карагандинский зоопаркKaraganda Zoo |logo=Log Kar Zoo.JPG |logo_width=150px |logo_caption=Karaganda Zoo Logo |image=Berezovaya-rosha-osen.jpg |image_width=150px |image_caption=Birch avenue of new territory of the Karaganda zoo. |date_opened=1936/1938 |date_closed= |location=Karaganda, Kazakhstan |area=100 acres (0.40 km²) |coordinates= |num_animals=more of 1000 (1990) |num_species=250 (1990) |members=AZA |exhibits= |website=Karaganda Zoo }}Karaganda Zoo''' — the state zoo of the city Karaganda in Kazakhstan. The Karaganda Zoo is one of the largest and oldest zoological parks of Republic Kazakhstan. History Exact age of Karaganda zoo is unknown. Many documents, confirming of an origin of the zoo, have been lost. Few historical documents, telling about the Karaganda zoo, have remained some employees of the zoo and the townspeople, visiting zoological park since days of the basis. Category:Zoos in Kazakhstan Category:Karaganda ru:Карагандинский зоопарк +why is every one against me http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blue_eyes_gold_dragon&curid;=13060617&diff;=188753538&oldid;=188742671 i pressed undo ( +Wrong, Vyborg is the Russian name, English does not have an own name for the city. Viipuri was the only official name when the city belonged to Finland and the area was inhabited by Finns earlier than any Russian occupier even existed. In this context we are talking about a unilingually Finnish city in an autonomous state, it would be non-sense to use the Russian name. +1 Nephi 11:13, 1 Nephi 12:23, 1 Nephi 13:15, 2 Nephi 5:21, Alma 3:6, Mormon 5:15, +Newsletter I don't have anything else to add off the top of my head. +REDIRECT Talk:Downers Grove – Main Street (Metra) +Sorry - in re-reading my edit summary I can see why you are confused - I worded it poorly. What I meant to say was that I agreed with the IP user's deletion, because that paragraph is unsourced, appeared to be a personal account thus violating COI policy, and in any case represented an anecdote of no general interest. So, my edit summary was meant to be a comment on the passage that had been deleted, not your restoration of it. Should I do something to clarify? I would not agree with restoring that deletion without some justification. +" Obviously, none of the above rant has even the slightest relevance to this article, other than graphically confirming that ""Jack"" has no good-faith interest in improving it. Since this is not the place to urge another editor to seek psychiatric help, all I can do is to once again restore the article to a neutral stub and call on Wikipedia to place this article under protection. " +But please unblock me.}} +Old Jim does seem to blame the Israelis for a lot of things. I saw you on Press TV today - owned and operated by the Iranian Govt for goodness sake. If you read this Jimbo, could you give us some facts to back up your crazy theories? +Needs work, but an important topic Hello - This article does a good job of identifying the themes outlined in scholarship on this topic: global inequality and disability, disproprotionality of mentally disabled youth in crim justice system (in US), costs to family. Much is needed to be done. My student working on this page found that the experience of disability impacts youth differently, and that disability impacts the youth experience. I hope this article can be improved by other editors. Cheers, +Death to Musulmans! +December 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. +totally constructive the section is totally constructive or has some miner errors, but the editios you made point to citations that give opinions from investigators that try to counter the rape accusations, in other words they are nothing more than speculations , it if fine if my name is written along with my speculations about the church without any physical evidence? +Thank you for your extensive comments, but I believe I've fully addressed the issue on the talk page of the relevant article, so there is nothing further to discuss here. +I have also noted more citations are needed but do not know the code to point them out. I will later include a list here on which a source is needed. - DT +And one more thing. The next section answers your question, even before you asked it. +Video game articles. Hi there Magicperson6969, are you new to Wikipedia? What is your nationality? Cheers. +" Since when am I an advocate of cold fusion? I advocate citing sources, that is all. I'm glad to see you're siding with someone under arbitration for conduct such as this. ™ " +/online.dudley.gov.uk/news/fullrelease.asp?recid=2097 Hardwicke memorial press release] +G4? JamesBWatson, you may want to reply over at WP:REFUND#Gracie Barra Montreal. I have to admit it doesn't look like it qualifies for WP:CSD#G4 to me, since the version you deleted was a complete rewrite that didn't resemble the one deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gracie Barra Montreal. ~ +" Done. Ping me " +By definition, there is no paraphiliac flirting. +On a side note, you may want to work on these Dialogue Stalk me +" Hello Hi, i introduce myself. I am Jivesh from Mauritius. I strictly edit Beyonce related articles here. Would you like to join this? • Talk2Me " +Archive Can you tell me how to archive my talk page? +" You might just be right. Initially I assumed good faith, as per WP:AGF. But now it seems its getting out of hand. I'm not an admin either, but I intend to create a ruckus in a while if this character isn't blocked for disruptive editing. If indeed its similar to the Nature magazine incident, then its alarming. Please post this on WP:ANI, and raise concerns with whichever admins you feel could help. I'll do the same. We need to stop the rumours being spread. Best regards, | ☎ " +No Wolfkeeper, it's you that is wrong. +TALK TALK TALK blubber ALL KINDS OF BORING THINGS!!! +" Challenge accepted. " +" Please show me where I have been ""incivil."" And since you blocked me, you ought to at least add the following to the page I was editing before your ever-civil accusations of ""trolling"" greeted me: JayW - Predators do not scrutinize the internet in the hopes of tracking some kid who foolishly posted their name to Wikipedia. It simply doesn't happen. It doesn't happy here, nor does it happen anywhere else; and I would be happy to concede to anyone who proves otherwise, though I very much doubt that will happen. I whole-heartedly believe the situation this policy is designed to protect against is a terrible myth which, by distracting money, time and effort from actual issues, facilitates the sexual abuse of children. On the other hand, some predators do use the chat services to anonymously groom children. This situation, while I doubt it would happen in such an incovenient environment, might deserve a policy. ..so, does this policy solve anything, as it stands? No - it doesn't prevent children from stating their age. Instead, it focuses on irrelevant information, like their street address and real name, which the predator can acquire privately once he has located the child's online contact information. Since many people use the same username across all the interwebs, this probably wouldn't be difficult. The only solution, so far as I can see, is to police kids who mention their age. Any other policy is, to say the least, completely useless. Out, " +" Do I need one? Do you have a cite for ""No one disputes there are racial gaps in IQ""? Actually, you can't have one (or at least, one that has any basis in reality), because I've just disputed it. The AAS likewise have disputed it, for that matter: WHEREAS all human beings are members of one species, Homo sapiens, andWHEREAS, differentiating species into biologically defined ""races"" has proven meaningless and unscientific as a way of explaining variation (whether in intelligence or other traits), '''THEREFORE, the American Anthropological Association urges the academy, our political leaders and our communities to affirm, without distraction by mistaken claims of racially determined intelligence, the common stake in assuring equal opportunity, in respecting diversity and in securing a harmonious quality of life for all people"". This looks clear enough to me... " +" MfD nomination of User:Ryeinn . Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryeinn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of | My Talk " +" ViperNerd, the Admins are closing in on you...they know you were indefinitely blocked... " +SMOKE WEED ERRYDAY RIGHT BEFORE CLASS....PROFESSOR ;) +Your typing is amazing. There you are, looking square at your pancreas and you still manage to hit most of the correct keys. As for you commentary, it is remarkable to find so much intellectual and syntactical chaos in an assertion that contains no more than fifteen words. Nazis? I understand Nazis and their fascism and it is clear that I am dealing with one here. Here are a fewer other things that wikipedia is not: very good, and, a cure for homosexuality. +"Note that the article Salonius of Embrun refers to a Council of Lyon ""c. 567"", suggesting that there were more than these two. If someone could figure out how to resolve this apparent discrepancy between the two articles, it would be much appreciated. " +now you're saying im not logical? when do these personal attacks end? they dont bother me too much though, becuase you keep saying the same thing. im illogical, im an idiot, whatever. i've gotten used to that one. try a new one. (how did you like the subtle one i made about you with the porcupine?) +now you fucking pathetic moron. cc: Jimbo Wales rootmyass +":: But all the article said (in my version) was that ""jonah goldberg thinks..."". I didn't present it as fact (nor is it). His book was reviewed and presumably you can find someone who says that goldberg is wrong. And what exactly is wrong with the Hamby quote? " +" Bigger than, Biggest ever, etc. This is not about who is bigger than. This is about the municipality. Not about the metro area. That is another topic. Not about the province. That is another article. Not about Greece. That is another article. Not about the EU. That is another article. We would like to concern ourselves to Thessaloniki city only. If you would prefer to maintain the higher level articles on the metro area, I am sure the editors would welcome you there. We are not trying to ""compete"" with them nor duplicate what justly belongs in their article and justly does not belong here. " +If you view the actual page itself and click on the numbers in the parentheses above each claim, then you will see the proof. I see you're new here. Have fun, and do good research! +Whilst the links may or may not work, your signature seems to be miscolored and misshaped. +" Completion date Once again, someone has changed the completion date to 30 June '09, though this time they have modified the reference so it no longer shows the photo with the billboard saying 30 Dec '08. The new reference is now to the main page at http://burjdubaiskyscraper.com which does indeed say 30 June '09. My question is: can burjdubaiskyscraper.com be considered a reliable source? I think we should change the completion to 2009, but not include an exact date. Since burjdubaiskyscraper.com is just a third-party site, I do not think they can be trusted with knowing the official information. But, Emporis.com does have a completion date of 2009; they can be trusted. Also, I do not know how anyone can know the exact date of the completion of a building. It would be best to just stick to the year. (talk | contributions) Height in early March 2008 Several editors have changed the height of the Burj Dubai from 604.9 m to 611.3 m. I have changed it back to 604.9 metres as no official statment has yet been made by Emaar. I propose that the height not be changed unless Emaar makes an official statement or there is a change of the height on the Burj Dubai's official site: www.burjdubai.com. Since only the developer knows the exact height, we should not use any updates or information from other sources. Once the height on the official website is updated should we change the height here on Wikipedia. (talk | contributions) I agree. One official source is better than many conflicting unofficial sources. Remaining milestones I have my doubts whether the Petronius oil platform qualifies as a ""world's tallest freestanding structure"" and as a milestone for Burj Dubai to pass. Most of it's structure is below water and therefore doesn't qualify under CTBUH rules. I do not have an opinion on the issue, just a few comments. Consensus is that it is not considered the tallest; and therefore may not warrant being included as a milestone. But, despite that, it does stand taller than the CN Tower, even if it is in water. It will not hurt if we keep it, and will not be a major deal if we take it away. Let us see if anyone else has an opinion. (talk | contributions) At this rate, we gotta keep all those deep level mines too since they are much 'taller' than any tower or oil platform ever built. Actually, many argue that the Petronius is the ""tallest free-standing structure"", hence the usual addition of ""on land"" to the Burj Dubai's title (for now), and previously to the CN Tower's title. So I don't agree that consensus agrees to the contrary; consensus agrees that it is not on land, but there is much support of it being a free-standing structure in general. CTBUH has never released any information about the world's tallest structures; it only measures the height of the tallest buildings, so by its rules the CN Tower also would not count. It is therefore not very relevant in this situation. Anyway, I believe that the Petronius should be kept as a milestone. Cheers, -me Would Petronius stand on it's own without buoyancy? Even if it can, a lot of the difficulty of a tall structure is in the construction process. Oil rigs have a serious advantage there because they don't need tall cranes, because you can access the top with boats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.142 Bill Baker Some mention should be made of Bill Baker the head structural engineer at Skidmore +Discussion , , this is while disscusion over me. and i'am planned to discussion meeting for me, and , i'am sorry to edit was so bad, and copying things like the typhoon season, as it messaged me by those users recent. i'am planned, me, was a blocked, with this discussion. so i'am, planned to join again, with 27 yrs old. so the deal from Wikipedia was expired, so i'am extended an 5-month deal. -Instalok +This again shows that User Charles is stalking me. He keeps this user page in watchlist - and appears here less than two hours after I posted my complaint. If I had been stalking Charles in the start of this, I would have seen that he had approached Keilana with an accusation against me (and I would have had some possibility to answer before that questionable blocking made by Keilana). However, I do not stalk User Charles, contrary to what he is doing. I have been reading several times about White Rajahs of Sarawak - there is my edit in discussion about another White rajah, before User Charles appeared to that page. Generally, I have some same interest fields, which is why I occasionally edit same articles and participate same discussions. However, in this thing, Keilana, very unbecomingly to anything which is needed to be impartial, seems to have chosen her party. (And surely User Charles appears soon to stalk me and stalk my comments.) +World Kannada Conference- Metro DC area 2006 +I didn't tag it, but I agree with the tag. The article is very unbalanced. Almost every paragraph is written from the perspective of his critics. There are plenty of comments here explaining the unfairness of the criticism. +" HELLO Which opinions were those. You mean re: abortion. They have been deleted off your page so i don't know what they were. If you could just refresh my memory.... P.S: You missed the ""d"" in entitled." +From Virginia's Statehouse to Gettysburg Scapegoat +WHATEVER, FUCK YOU ALL!!! +RIP Requiescat in pace. +" there is no electron Facts: 1) Faradays law of induction cannot be explained by electron theory Source: physics Textbook 2) Maxwells electromatetic theory is in direct violation of electron theory. Most notably from his theory displacement current is still taught as mainstream science. Source physics Textbook 3) In chemisty the number of electrons leaving a mass is determined by the voltage Source: chemistry textbook 4) In induction physics, the current is determined by the number of coils in the winding source: physics textbooks 5) In circiut theory the current is determined by the load Source: also physics textbook 6) these three things are all different 7) In the power industry, there is also something called ""current draw"" which is a current not determined by the load but the power supply Source: Con Edison training manual 8) All of these things with the exception of 7 are excepted theories of science that contflict with the electron. Number 4 and 5 conflict with number 3 which is part of the definition of the electron. Known people in the scientific community who said that they did not hold electrons to be true without proof(or admitted there existance to be different than that of mainstream science) 1) Albert Einstien said that their existance was different 2) Max Planck said that he would not hold it to be true without proof 3) Faraday was totally against the idea before it ever came out 4) Tesla in his patents refers to electricity as a pressure rather than a substance 5) Heaviside said that electrons were compressed ether 6) JJ Thomson the so called discover of the electron said that he did not agree with the electron theory that was interpreted from his experiment. Anyone else that a circuits textbook fails to mentions. Actually I find that most circuits textbooks don't even talk at all about any scientist. What I demand: 1) A scientific presentation of electron theory that uses the scientific method 2) A list of people in the scientific community who actually accepted this (and hold electrons to be a fact and more than a theory), and on what basis of the scientific method did they accept it." +get lost Get lost steve and take your purile troublemaking comments on my talk page with you. Buzz off. +I'll edit and add something to this, too, in a few hours after Eloquence has had a turn. There are many different views on this, which should be properly ventilated - 04:49, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC) +He wouldn't have to if he weren't so goddamn crazy! 66.68.86.111 +" Hello there D. Maass. Unfortunately, I deleted the article due to a lack of notability. Do you believe this to be a mistake on my part? I have been known to make them! ) 17 " +" I don't really need to give sources because they've been given dozens of times before, and it's the status quo. As for your source, I can pick it apart: ""As a permanent resident, you have the right to: ... Live and work permanently anywhere in the U.S."" Since one does not in fact have the right, even as a citizen, to live and work permanently in American Samoa without permission, that throws this blanket statement into doubt. I'm not saying this is saying American Samoa is not part of the country; I'm saying, you can't annex an island (or un-annex) with a brochure. If we had decided American Samoa was part of the country, and I supplied this brochure as evidence that it shouldn't be, would you accept that? Because of this statement? " +" You refused My Block Application On The Grounds Of My Ability To pel Visa Vie FUCK YOU!! Youa Middles Class Fuck!!! Craig ""Brown"" Mcewan Craig ""Brown"" Mcewan Born In The Year Of 1991, The Year Of The Brown? I Think So, Born In Browtown USA He Is Widely Regarded As The One Man Banter Machine, He Can Regularly Be Seen Pumping His Fists In Joy, He Also Enjoys The Simple Things In Life Such As Long Walks On The Beach, Glowing Sunsets,A Nice Glass Of Port, And Also When Mike Wears Tight T-shirts Into College To Which He Remarks On With Joy And A Glint In His Eye,He Can Regularly Be Found Volunteering At Old Peoples Homes In Order To Take Part In Some ""Extracurriculur"" Activity, When He's Not At The OAP's Home He Can Regularly Be Found Helping the Oldies Accross The Street, Sometimes Even If They Don't Need It,He Loves To Pump Iron And is Hoping To Take Part in Next Years Worlds Strongest Man Competition,He Says He Owes All His Strength To His Love Of ""Chezzy Coke"" And is Very Rarely Seen Without A Can Of The Said Product In His Grasp, His Hair Is The Hair Of The Gods, He Was Born With Hair As It Is Today, It Does Not Grow,It Does Not Need To Be Washed,It Does Not Get Cut,It Is Completely Self Sustaining, He Regularly Takes Part In Generic Bolognese Sauce Days In Which He Will Leave College Early In Order To Indulge On His Love For Generic Bolognese Sauce,His Claim To Fame Is The Invention Of The ""Brown Noise"" Which Was A Natural Occurence From Craig ""Brown"" Mcewan After He ""Discharged"",He Hopes To Campaign For Prime Minister In The Next General Election Under The ""Brown"" Party And Hopes To Get The ""Brown"" Movement Going Soon,So Heres To Craig ""Brown"" Mcewan, WE SALUTE YOU!!!, YOU TRULY ARE A GOD AMONGST MEN!!!" +it's just the damn internet. +No, I'm afraid I am not, there is nothing in that phrase that can be qualified in anyway as warrant to a warning. And where have I used the everybody is doing it? To the contrary, I am ready to pay the price, but THIS, does not warrant any warning, and I advice you to submit that phrase to any administrator and see what he/she has to say. As for your adminsitrator abilities, I judge what I see, it is my right to question it, you should not dump every critics, when they are in ones talk page, as incivility and justify a block. Now you tell me how am I supposed to assume good faith when you single me out on the middle of discussions that when my 'incivilities' are compared to what is done else, it is nothing, while you appear to totally ignore those, I simply request common sense. Being administrator should assume that you know that the most important thing is what Wikipedia is, it is an encyclopedia and articles are the most important thing. You as an administrator are above all a user like any other user, administrative privilages should only be used when a user is disturbing, so for you to warn me, you should justify how telling someone that he refuse to listen, when he really refuse to listen warrant to a warning, or how am I disturbing. It is to you to convince me now that your blocking of a contributor a Wikipedian as much as you is not disturbing. Also, that you refuse to accept your mistake on the face of the obvious doesn't give a good opinion of you. But I am sure, that is the last of your worries. Just consider that everyone make mistakes, whatever or not they recognize it is what matters. (ix) +SPOILERS: It's a helmet (with a retractable tongue). From the videos I've seen, you can see part of his face behind the tongue in an appearance early-ish, and just before his boss battle then his entire face is revealed (although it's still somewhat strange). The whole thing seems to be part of his armour and parts of it can be unfolded and hidden at will. (In addition, it might be interesting to add Zant's lunatic behaviour when you meet him as a boss, in contrast to his more serious depiction earlier - I haven't played the game, but possibly it's because Ganondorf's left him to return to Hyrule personally?) +The infobox template doesn't actually get it's host city information from this article; I've removed the parameter. To edit the host city line, you'll want to go to Template:Olympics infobox/Host city and edit that. (Speak to me) +"]] Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages''', and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place """" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help." +fuck you, idiot. you don't even know the subject obviously. get fucked. lol! +Problem What is Daniel Dae Kim's problem? Don't even act like you don't know. +Dayuum, bitch. , Baby! +CommentOn a side note would you mind closing the article / deleting it. The AFC debate has now been hijacked with nonsense (from both sides) and I no longer want the article up there.Craddock1 +And a lot of Basques like me consider themselves Spaniards, in spite of the fact that we have to live with the harrassment of one of the most violent minorities in Europe, the extreme Basque nationalists. +and plutonic intrusions like the Monteregian Hills +irrelevent. straw man arguement. No one said HT alone was radicallzing Muslim youth. +How telling of WP processes that all the reviews I cite of the discussed effect are ignored by the above commentators, while they seek to justify themselves by freely imagining rebuttals of the cited evidence. What a farce these juveniles make of Wikipedia. Yet I happily leave to their juvenile arguments their blind-sighted conclusion. Why? Because if the readers of WP are of the same stock as these juvnile editors, then the information I have offered is evidently too complex for them to rationally consider. Also, my short foray into WP editing has evidenced that WP is no place to offer psychological knowledge that does not stick, prima facie, to Newtonian physics; here, psychological knowledge must stick to the classical world like peanut butter does to bread. Let us leave these juvenile retarders of scientifically appraised and communicated findings another decade of their Punch-and-Judy approach to public communication of scientific knowledge. Science will progress, as always, without the contribution of such self-appointed protectors of self-obvious truths, and such puppets of the mythical fundamentals of human knowledge. Rodgarton +Sounds good. I'll look too. +Propaganda This article is pure propaganda for the proposed film, is in no way balanced or encyclopaedic. I propose it for deletion unless it can be improved and balanced. +"::To:User:Martin Hogbin: Look. I would do it if it were true to my knowledge and/or there existed some reliable sources to confirm that. The saveur.com article, the only source against my claim that I consider at least semi-reliable, says ""It can also be eaten before it is allowed to ferment"". Do you think this confirms the existence of unfermented kimchi against all sources I gathered? Someone might like to have a bite of Sauerkraut before it is fermented. I don't want to argue with you or something, but I have heard that beer is made from only malt, hops, and water in Germany (as it should be). Unfortunately, at least in Korea, Japan, and the U.S., most beer includes rice, potato, corn starch, and many other ingredients I think unnecessary. At least they have ingredient lists on the bottles, and there are a lot of official documents on those additional ingredients. But kimchi is a different story. Like I said, I have never seen any packaged/jarred kimchi labeled ""unfermented"", maybe except for Japanses ""kimuchi"" which is more like pickled vegetables. And both traditional and contemporary kimchi is fermented. (they are not much different anyway.) Nevertheless, I am willing to temper my claim if editors can find even a couple of reliable sources that say some kimchi is unfermented. " +Very simply because if this was a wiki about sailing boats, you wouldn't be giving me this raft of shit. You are prejudiced, and you need to either take a neutral point of view, or be removed. I think maybe it is time for you to be removed. +External Links I have removed external links to discussion forums as they are a violation of WP:EL. +Sieg heil Gamaliel! Thank you for that utterly worthless block which prevented me from adding more content and expanding upon articles on Wikipedia! Great way to demonstrate the spirit of spreading knowledge, by blocking people for stupid reasons! So keep on censoring. +Ryerson University Ryerson University's Service Learning subsite +" Please read this, which should explain everything. // Talk // Contribs " +don't pretend i was attacking a group. i was raising a legitimate question about whether someone in canada knew enough about the topic to edit. that would apply just as much in reverse. in fact, they clearly didn't know enough. but pls don't let the facts get in the way of the campaign now under way. +/* Block MilboreOne Hey brother,Block MilboreOne and Huon.Please!! 115.132.230.189 +Don't allow yourself to be intimidated by Alex; he's just a little anxious since left. Oh, these faggots and their mood swings! +" do unto others I see that you have, for the third time in a few minutes, added an unencyclopedic remark about Ann Coulter's sex life. You are disrupting the page, and editing not out of a spirit of NPOV, but to deliberately provoke others and bait them to revert your work. I am asking an Admin to address this problem. klenk Paul, you have removed this reference as often as I have added it. It is true that Bill Maher has joked about his sexual relations with Ann Coulter on his TV show, I saw the episode myself and I'm sure there are plenty of references to it online. There is more than ""joking about"" it going on between the two but nothing that can be cited here. I searched the wikipedia policies and could find nothing violated and there are plenty of articles that mention the sex lives of various people. As you didn't try to remove the description of Maher being a ""friend"" of hers and as your ""balanced"" description of Ann that leaves out her factual distortions you are being clearly POV here. " +Thanks, in this case (now I can see the content) it turns out that this is not the Chris Greene I was thinking of. I'll re-use the page name for other other Chris Greene. Cheers +WIEM encyclopedia the article in WIEM is a piece of garbage, without a single source written by unknown author. It is not a valid reference for wikipedia for any facts, and your question is ridiculous. It is your duty to prove that such order existed. I am sick repeating: during the pervious discussion I diligently lookd thru original documents and found nothing even close. I am not less than you interested to present chronology of events of these times. `'Míkka +" You had offered... SSB, A while back you had offered to be an intermediary for SqueakBox and I, as we had mutually agreed not to post to each others' talk pages (an agreement of which I am still abiding at least). Well, I would like to ask his assistance with a little Wikipedia-related ... project. I need the help, it may be a little fun for him, and I am totally in good faith (and need) wanting to enlist his assistance. If you might communicate to him that I would like to run an idea past him, I would appreciate it. If so, I'll do it as he wishes; on his talk page or on mine. If not, that's fine too and my feelings won't be hurt. Thanks!!! • • • 01:13 (UTC) 27 Mar '08" +I needed a week off too. Thanks. Redyva claims the beer is his treat! Cheers +Ah Go fuck yourself. +i dont give a f*ck. i mean how can you not know that these singers sing in the whistle register. theres plenty of varified proof people just wanna be difficult cause they are assholes. i dont care if they wanna keep the policy or whatever. they know damn well those singers sing in the whistle register and just wanna make it harder for other people. like i said you have to be stupid to not know such things and i have a right to act how i want to. +More history? The following was added to the intro at Telescope. I am moving it here because it seems to deal with specifically Optical telescopes. I am putting it in talk because some of it does not have much to do with telescopes (camera obscura, pinhole lenses, ect.), and it is full of un-cited claims. Crystal Balls were used in China and India as lenses (possibly in the form of a camera obscura) to see at a distance as early as 400 BCE. Around 1000 CE, the Arabian astronomer and mathematician, Ibn al-Haytham, expanding and scientifically testing theories of Euclid, Ptolomey, and Aristotle, wrote about both pinhole lenses and concave lenses in his mathematical book on vision. Roger Bacon wrote about combining lenses to see at a distance in the 13th century, as did the 16th Century Italian spectacle maker, Giambattista della Porta (1538-1615), and a host of others. +I spoke too soon. Someone else speedy deleted it for being advertizing. (talk) +Help on Tactopoda Hi! I'm Dino guy 3, and my friend Awesome210 really needs your help on the Tactopoda page. He needs the cladogram fixed, but has been locked out of Wikipedia. Even if he wasn't, he's not that good at typing up cladograms. So, you see, he really needs your help. I would appreciate it if you fixed the cladogram for him. +July 2007 (UTC) Probably mostly modesty. Some people would be mortified if their friends and co-workers were to find out they had been snipped, because they confuse their fertility with their virility. Maybe that particular practice had had a bad experience with a meddling relative who found out something they shouldn't. 10:00, 23 +" Caucasoid Is it really necessary to mention that some Uyghurs are fair-skinned and have Caucasoid traits? It sounds a bit like Nazi ""science"" to me... Luis Rib Well, they do have such traits. You can phrase it a bit differently if you like. ]] 02:24, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC) It wouldn't be necessary if we lived in a world in which race (whether considered a real or constructed category) was irrelevant. Unfortunately, that's not the case. The ethnic characteristics of Uyghurs play an important role in discussions of the relationship between Uyghurs and Han Chinese and thus how ""Chinese"" Xinjiang is or should be. In order to understand the politics of Uyghur/Chinese relations, it's important to know that these characteristics are commonly discussed. 20:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Why Caucasoid traits? These traits are probably more Semitic than Caucasoid. 86.166.123.12 The more we try to parse this issue the thornier it gets. Read the Caucasian race entry in Wikipedia and see if you can find any way to separate Semitic from Caucasoid. The entire concept of race is in dispute, and regardless of how people ordinarily discuss differences, an encyclopedia ought to try to avoid such uninformed hypotheses in its entries. It might be better to describe, for example, a people as having blue eyes and fair skin and lacking the epicanthic fold, as well as being largely Muslim, than to try to categorize them by ""race,"" and so I'd agree that dropping ""Caucasoid"" would be smart. After all, much of the European population has at least some Mongolian ancestry, as do Iranians, Turks, Central Asians, and so on - and Uyghurs are certainly included in this distribution regardless of their ""Caucasoid traits."" And if you go back far enough, I suppose the entire world population has African ancestry. You can see how this can become like an argument about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and has no place in an encyclopedia that is trying to be authoritative and factual. " +- I put the link here but it was immediately removed, look through this page history to get to read the uncensored truth. +" Hmmm, good point. I've changed it to ""Northumbrian noble"". Fatuorum " +Try using #, and replacing the *'s. It will automatically enumerate it. '''''' (Talk to the hand!) +Yes and their most famous track was: -we are the J-guys, we are circumed -we are cised -our fellows in Israel are also -circum-vened second verse: -what is it about us and circum'ed -dont know, it is all very -circum-spect -circum-spect +Battle of Sarsa It was not won by anyone.Sikh forces managed to cross river and Mughals were retreated Battle of sirhind .Sikhs killed wazir khan and established sikh rule in punjab .Fateh burj commemorates the great victory of sikhs over sirhind. now tell me why you are ignorant fool +}} {{WikiProject United States |class=Start |importance=low +She has more or less always done this, removing posts from her talk page when she doesn't like what she's being told, this makes it way hard for anyone to follow such a thread and is why I haven't bothered to have a go at helping her understand why this has happened and, I should say, what she might do to get herself unblocked long before a month is up (which would be to agree straightforwardly that endlessly attacking other editors with claims of policy violations when they don't agree with her as to content is not only boring, it's not on here and leads to blocks because it's wholly disruptive, as I tried to tell her many times before). Yes, I suspected you would be watching, Gwen. I thought about dragging you into the ANI thread when I first saw it ) ping! +sorry I have never written anything on Wikipedia before. i don't know how to refer. i am curious: do you know what is difference between identical and similar? +" :File:GuatemalaMission.jpg Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:GuatemalaMission.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information. If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license to license it under the GFDL, or to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use to release it into the public domain. If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license. If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. " +You said that the article should present the facts as found by the ICTY. And they were presented that way. I don't see what is the problem (Actually I know what the problem is, for you and your friends). On the other hand, there is a planty of sources including UN resolutions, US resolution, academic and human rights institutions as HRW and UCR, even in Serbia for instance Natasa Kandic and Fond za humanitarno pravo, which call it the Srebrenica Genocide. So, no need to lie, nor deny. Regards. +In favor of merging== Since August 2010, the underground and aboveground Cheongnyangni stations have been directly transferrable through a transfer passageway, contradicting Peterhansen2032's argument. As a rule of thumb, on transferrable stations on the Seoul Subway, the information is combined into one, even for stations with different names (e.g. Isu Station, Cheonan Station). Rather than having to go through a disambiguation page to access information on one of the stations, it would be much more efficient to integrate it into one page for convenient viewing. I support merging. == +Boxer Stadium JonBroxton can you help me with a soccer stadium in San Francisco. You uploaded a great overhead photo of in 2008 and I want to do the same for Boxer Stadium and am having problems. NASA World Wind doesn't have enough data and http://msrmaps.com is a wiki copyright violation. Any suggestions? +Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you). +Never mind I found them. But I was talking about the one on the top of your page. +REDIRECT Talk:Erc of Slane +but don't hide red criems becouse U then - POV +just crushes my world. hahahaha losers +Well, see you before arbitration then. I consider this harassment on your part. And I will reinstate my messages over your objections. I think your brother administrator Remember the dot would unblock me if you try to block me. He sounds like he allows a fair hearing before he acts. +I am fed up with editors and administrators ignoring requests for assistance in removing personal attacks by dismissing inappropriate behaviour as 'that's just the way he is'. If Mr Steadman's ego is so fragile that he cannot participate in an online debate without getting hysterical, then perhaps he shouldn't do it. I want these comments removed. If not, then I will refer you to arbitaration for abuse of admin privileges, I will refer Mr Steadman for his CIV/AGF and NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - to get his page deleted or improved and to have him sanctioned. You keep on playing the guilt card and telling me to move on - I have, I have kept away from him - all I want is for someone to prevent him from attacking me. Please sort it. +" The Things I Added... ...were NOT VOD services. And, furthermore, I worked hard to Wiki-ize the ""ethnic"" channels list, only to have it all reverted for no reason. You guys suck.66.177.73.86 " +Hey alabamoy boy why dont you stick your head up your fucking ass and see how far it fucking fits you fucking asshole +I don't fix disambig by AWB, but, just and it is working well! +"I don't even have to click on the link to see that the press release is from 2006-probably when Ceku was already ""prime minister"" and since Leaders have immunity from Interpol what you posted was completely useless and entirely irrelevent. Why don't you just forget about trying to post facts because you don't have any. " +" For the chop: Primordial Orion At the moment, this appears to be WP:OR, since no one is sourced as originating the idea that Enkidu and Orion are somehow linked. Does the idea come from a reliable scholarly source? If not, the whole section just has to go. " +The first of your links is something to agree to however. Leaving out 'fucking'. For the second, truthful one, I would've gone with a week however. But it's not my call. +Issues with 86, were worked out. It was a matter of Reliable sources. Anything questionable I go to the rs/noticeboard Which is why I stick to google news and google books. +":Sorry, I should have said (I was in too much of a hurry). I can't remember the article, but it was the placing of a template I think — I thought that that was rather more than minor. Not hugely serious, but I thought that I'd leave a friendly reminder. (Talk) " +is not a proper name just like lexi +PS you have constantly failed to be respectful to me, youve been threating and upperty. +Come on! This was after you made a million and one excuses and refused to change the SIMPLE editonly because it goes against your New England fudamnetalist views. After I have provided proof and you have provided nothing and you STILL don't allow the change, what eles can I call you but a liar? +" atomic49er User atomic49er Since I own all copyrights to The Gas Theory and Gravitation and any and all works by me, and you previously rejected these works, I now prohibit you from posting any mention of these works other than that which I myself have posted. you rejected my copyright yet I own those pages in question. I am not and was not offended, however I deny Wikipedia as a credible source. I have encouraged Google to produce ""encylopediactionary"" all the worlds encyclopedias and dictionaries in one synopsis. to prevent your site from destroying the worlds sources of reliable information. your site is nothing more than a goofball run novelty. your site has repeatedly rejected actual authors and actual people from correcting and publishing their real and true works. you are a threat to the worlds supply of information. It is shameful and sad to think how may people you have offended. citations made by me to courts have been of information that I deemed worth to submit as written. I however have seen and heard of the grave and serious ""editing"" by your staff which has polluted honest submissions. I recommend that you stop patting yourself on the back and realize your short comings. Joseph E Bressman I say to you all at Wikipedia cease and desist!!! You must provide references to all the worlds collected resource and reference books!!! you must correlate your articles with all the worlds encyclopedias and dictionaries !!! you must at least provide the synopsis from each and every parallel and credible resource. to assist in the selling of those works which have long stood to enlighten our world !!! you must not continue on with your lollygagging mam-be-pambe malarkey bulldung freebie rally killing oddness. I hope you all realize the real and true threat you pose to our world educational process. poised to extinguish all for profit and long standing publication after the next1 my education is based partly on van nostrand's scientific encyclopedias the encyclopedia astronomy and any and all other reference books which I purchased and owned!. SO I DEMAND YOU CITE REAL AND TRUE SOURCES SO PEOPLE MIGHT BUY THOSE BOOKS.(cd's/dvd's) which are more than you hippie yuppie pseudo know it all ""nomanac of idiom"". ok man??!!??? Jesus H Christ !!. """"""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ"""""""" unsigned comment added by User:atomic49er (UTC)" +AFAIK they were not granted full independence - from some declassified State Department memos I was looking at, when Eric Williams tried to force the US to withdraw from its bases in Trinidad the British government re-assured the US that if Williams became too extreme in his demands they (the UK) could remove him from power. Since this was during the Federation (1960, if I remember correctly) I would infer that the Federation was not independent. Other than that I just have negative proof - that I have never heard of an independence ceremony (which, if it had happened would have been in Trinidad, since the Federal capital was there) and the fact that most of the islands reverted to being British possessions after dissolution. +August 07, 2009 Dear Gwen, Thanks for Blocking Bal537 for his disruptive edits. +Attitude towards Dacian fortresses articles Yes, some of the Dacian fortresses articles are placeholders. As you know, I invited members such as yourself to contribute to them. And yes they lack references, but they are by no means non-notable as you marked them. None of them! You just have to google each one of them. PLENTY of articles and books. Given your recent edits, I am seriously questioning your motives and I am starting to be unable to WP:AGF. If you are not genuinely interested to contribute to WP:DACIA articles as a member, to help them grow, I am politely inviting you to leave the project. Your are pushing radical POVs and changes in way to many places at once, at is obvious what you are doing. Please stop and start a dialog. +" The primary goal of the case based textbook is to inform doctors of what to do when they are asked to perform different medical operations. The case based textbook only has one chapter on circumcision. Its primary goal is to inform doctors of how to react in the case they are asked to perform a circumcision. It does not give an overview of questions that have been raised about the procedure, and doesn't cover sources of controversy in the medical field (only debates). This makes it unfit to speak for this topic. Maybe it would be better to use it to highlight another statement involving controversies in the medical field. The second source titled Controversies with one author is ok, as it does go over some medical controversies that exist, notably in consent and the parental role. I think a better sourcing for this statement ""Ethical and legal questions regarding informed consent and autonomy have been raised over non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.[8][9]"" would be one that highlights significant questions from community groups in a specific demographic. If we could get a source that is clearly indicating that these questions are being raised that would be better. JohnP " +" I'm afraid you're wrong. The vast majority of the ""no"" votes addressed policy, mostly WP:RS. They pointed out that (a) the sources are not sufficiently reliable on this topic or that (b) they did not specifically call him a philosopher, but some other variant on the term. In contrast, none of the ""yes"" votes addressed policy in their statements, although you did this in other areas of the debate. 57 " +Hardware data sheet +" IMO, it's completely irrelevant. A horrible film can be successful and a great film can be a commercial flop. ""Worst"" refers to whether the film is so bad that someone (a reliable source) states there are no other films that are less good. It has nothing to do with whether or not it was well marketed. - " +The other guy is the one at fault. I'm sure it's the same Italian guy, who created a new account to get around his own block. Why don't you do something about him? +Request for Comments We seem to be deadlocked on the naming issue; for which I am happy to accept some of the blame. It's clear that other editors don't think I'm acting with NPOV aims, which is fine; but means that anything I do seems unlikely to solve the problem. I'd like to ask some other editors to comment on the issue by listing it at Wikipedia:Requests for Comments. Does that sound sensible? +"== A barnstar for you! == The Original Barnstar Good Job... Very helpful... Thanks. " +Will do, but you have an anti-semitic problem here. I think you need to handle that... +Answer notification I have answered on my talk page +" That's beside the point. The pages are supposed to ""redirect"" to My and He is vandalising them. I hope " +, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Yeah, you should have a look at WP:CITEFOOT for the syntax. 21:18 +maintain this block without doing so +BTW, at the time, the BP Abadan Refinery was the biggest oil refinery in the world. +This article is blatant advertsising. +" my stupidity? I should receive an award for attacking that horrible ""coldplay"" rock group, whose popularity must be based upon hooking up with McDonalds or Holiday Inn, because that seems to be how music groups get attention in the USA, if they go to bed with some big corporation. That other editor had the nerve to revoke my edits of a Russian female musician even though he admits limited musical knowledge. Somebody needs to remove the tags from that listing and leave it alone. It would make me very mad to see that listing removed, as some have threatened, that would be the ultimate sin. I mean, this whole notability issue is just senseless. ""coldplay"" is notable for selling records, not quality, and somehow Wikipedia needs to pay more attention to quality, less attention to whether or not a rock musician sells a lot of t-shirts at a Wal-mart in Iowa lol Hell, if Wikipedia lists an artist who only sold one CD, and that CD is high quality, something far superior to ""coldplay,"" then I say, list the musician who sold one CD, and erase ""coldplay."" You seem like you might ""get it,"" you seem like somebody who might have some common sense, although your photo sure is strange. " +I hate this bot Its so annoying, it trys to delete almost every image! +The Hon Sir Percy Simmons K.B.E. (OG 1885-90), Chairman of L.C.C. +" Thanks Black Kite. Talk " +Apparently the Manchester/Trafford boundaries followed the Cornbrook and Black Brook, long since culverted, and clearly archaic in view of heavy development. And +I am feeling this page advertises various websites for moodboard creation. This, however, is not permitted on Wikipedia, so I suggest the removal of the links concerned. Does anyone have objection to this? If not, I will remove the links in three days. +I wonder if this Fries is the theoretician who improved the audio-lingual method in Language teaching by adding behaviorist psychology ideas. Can someone please clarify if this Charles Fries is the one from Michingan State univ. thanks64.76.110.46 +" Two simple facts? I really like this Thomas...""this is not about ""CT"" vs. ""OCT""; it is about getting two simple facts as accurately presented as possible"" there are no facts regarding controlled demolition of the WTC. I had hoped you would come to realize this but apparently you have not. You argue incessantly about only one topic and you are a single purpose account who I see is misusing this resource to promote your agenda. I am going to be very busy over the next week, but I indeed hope you start working on other articles and cease and desist with your neverending crusade to minimize factual information. " +RedSpruce Redux As I said in our last conversation, arguing about quotes in footnotes at one article serves no purpose. When consensus is reached at one article, RS moves to another article. We are now here. What is your opinion? +" Hey also on the soundtracks thing, Why cant we say what songs were in movie soundtracks. And also all of the song I put were in their respective movie's Soundtrack so I think it would be best to put them in a seperate section one for songs in another album and one for songs in a movie's soundtrack album " +Kasaalan, WP:NOTABLE addresses the question of whether a subject is notable enough to justify an entry in Wikipedia. It is independent of whether a source is reliable enough for WP:RS, as far as I can tell from the WP:NOTABLE entry and its links. I agree with you on the writer's POV, but put that aside for now. I want to get the verifiability issue out of the way. If it's not verifiable we can't use it, and nothing else matters. WP:VERIFIABILITY is one of the cornerstones of Wikipedia. Is a citation to a book verifiable, if WP editors can't check it, because it's only in 3 libraries in the world? +"==Cedomir Jovanovic== Hello I've noticed that you have added info that Čedomir Jovanović is of Roma origin. As far as I know this information is false and this article has already been locked once because of one user persistently inserting claim that he is of Roma origin. If you can provide evidence for your claims I would be more than happy to allow it to stay, but since I am from Serbia and know guy quite well I do not believe it, at least without some proof. I have nothing against Roma people but in a same way you can say that he is a Swede. It is baseless. So, I've removed it from an article. I hope you understand. All the best Thanks for the answer. I apologies in any case for not studying the changes thoroughly but since last vandalism string we had was pretty relentless I wanted to react quickly. You can see discussion page for more details. By the way I would ask you for a favor. Since Wikipedia article you have listed states he is a of Roma origin can you ask that user to provide you a source and if he does that you pass it over to me. Thanks. If not I hope that you will as a decent Wikipedia user you are amend the article to exclude unchecked and if you believe me baseless informations. Thanks TAB Pondicherry University I noted the change of title you made to the article 'Pondicherry University'. Has the name of the university changed to 'Puducherry University'. I think, name of the university remains 'Pondicherry University' even though name of the place changed. DYK On June 2, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GayFest, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. ✍ Speaking of gay, guess who's back? Fair use rationale for Image:GayFest2006.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:GayFest2006.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. GayFest references It would be nice if English translations for Romanian news article titles could be provided. Regards. Thanks! Tomorrow, I'l probably go and covert them to Cite templates. Okay, I converted everything except the Pravda and Nadiafax links, because they were inaccessible. The Journalul title also lacks a translation (I think it's because it was added after I made the above comment), and I commented out the last ref because it seemed to have an improper url or something. It linked to the program for 2006. GayFest discussion Do you have any idea on who these guys, Anonimu and Biruitorul are? They look very much like what I read in the news about ""Noua Dreapta"". Disturbing... Vanadals This has been +" Nothings going to happen with that, aint even a point in wasting the time. But thank you for the notice. nableezy - " +Acorn issues I was quite disappointed to have the changes I worked on earlier tonight stripped out and the page locked. I wanted to include the current distress of ACORN and felt I was being careful in connecting relevant news agencies that would validate the issues. Maybe my wording was less than ideal, but the content I wanted to convey certainly should be attributed to the current and apparently ongoing actions of ACORN. Please reconsider and possible include the context of the issue more completely. Thanks +Agreed. Chadbryant is merely running at windmills and his visor is obscuring his vision. +And to add on to what I just said, if the two of you wanted to be good Wikipedia contributors, you'd help with finding the secondary sources, not just section blanking. I've been digging all day, Wikipedia contributors are supposed to help each other, and you two are just destroying my work, which given enough time I can have properly sourced, but you are not even helping, just vandalizing! 72.72.240.141 +I guess that makes sense about PaxTerra though since he put him in as well as Sambo's which seems very out of place. +Hamlet 1996 film Hello again. Just thought that I would let you know that | Talk +" THAT'S WRONG!!! I also spoke with IGN and David Hayter is the voice. ""Docbengal"" didn't understand that Andrew Anthony did the voice for the TV commercials- that's it. It also says that right on that article from IGN. The line for the commercials is, ""If it's in the game, it's in the game"". Daivd Hayter does the voice for the game; it's even in the credits at the end of the game. Someone esle should add it in; it's pretty funny how people are idiots and their think their all rough with their information. Take that. I'm done." +Erm... And the point is? +In 1965 PMR was simply renamed RCP. +Yes by all means take care of it. Thanks. I'd do it myself but it won't let me create a new page. Maybe leave the most recent stuff and get rid of the Peter Van Sant pages. +" ""Snuff me!"" http://www.kinkyceline.com/snuff.html - This one is probably the most disturbing snuff-video link in the history of the idea. This woman is planning a rape/torture video where things could easily go wrong, and if it does she's scripted out her own murder." +" The Brazilian figure is based on the national census. If there is no ""racial"" census in Chile, then the figure is based on what? How can people know the percentage of whites in Chile if there's no census? " +Supercouple I do see your point, but only some were commonly known with last name intact while others were not, and in the interest of uniformity, I kept them all with just first names. I'll do redirects with last names, for example: while many people know them as Luke and Laura Spencer, for uniformity purposes it will be shortened to Luke and Laura as there are just as many google hits that way. 21:28, Jun 23, 2004 (UTC) +Hi! It was great to see not only another fan of arrested development, but also a synaesthete! Good on you! You sound like a cool guy! , 19:03 11/03/06 +for January 2006 discussion. +Final word on this Yes, I thank you for your time in the matter and I know you were trying to help. I can see that what I was doing was violating WP:POINT. Originally the argument was because of the table width which I knew from the beginning was a dumb thing to fight over, but I was only thinking of aesthetics. She trounced me for it saying that I don't know what I'm doing, that she was enforcing MoS standards and it was a known problem because the page didn't show up correctly on certain monitor sizes. All I wanted was for her to show me where these standards are written, and if not that, where this issue was being discussed if it's such a big problem. Of course she couldn't. Why? Because they don't exist. I called her bluff, she knew it, and then she acted all innocent like I came out of no where to bully her. I got aggressive only after her rude, holier-than-thou tirade started. I've had to play this stupid game before with other idiots around here, usually they just go away, but she wanted to continue talking shit. She's just one of those crybabies who think they own the damn place and that kind of attitude pisses me off to no end. Sorry, but that's just me. I see bullshit everyday on here and I ignore 99% of it. She just happened to rub me the wrong way. Anyway, it's all cool. I don't care anymore, and is the last I'll talk about it. +REDIRECT Talk:Vincent O'Brien National Stakes +"== Nice class == Hi there I don't have a cite for the ""nice class"" concept. To be frank, the only place where I saw people reffering to that concept (and also the ""very nice class"" concept) was in a couple of C++-related Usenet groups, where the concept is usually used as a general guideline for class creation. On the other hand, my only interest in object-oriented programming is purely recreational (it's a small hobby) and therefore I feel that I'm not in a position to make big academic statements on this subject. So thanks to your message I realized that not only the references to the subject are scarse but also that it isn't widelly used. Therefore I believe that this article may be entitled to a ""original research"" label. If you decide to mark the article for deletion it will be fine by me and I will not object. Hope this helps | Talk " +Indeed, your'e right. What's so frustrating about English is that if you are not a native speaker, or at least learend it at very young age, you will get hard time to get to closer level with native speaker of English. It may be much easier for people whose native tongue is German, Dutch, some Scandinavian languages (except for Finnish) and etc-but for me at the least it's not come naturaly (but I must say that during the last years I didn't have many opportunities to practice it extensively). The English vocabulary is huge, not once there are 100 different words for the very same object with most cases it's unnecessary (probably it's related to the expansions of the British empire). I realy think that German and English are among the hardest languges to take control of. Spanise on the other hand, is very friendly.. +Welcome! Hello, Gizgalasi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! +By the way, I am and always was happy to fix up any specific issues with my edits that Elf brought to my attention (provided they weren't totally unreasonable), but I received no such requests from Elf, all he would do is revert the whole lot without consultation with me first. +, nor did it specifically mention sexual harassment in that regard +Hmm, thanks. But it's a nasty hack really ... — Martin ( · talk) +Very wrong. As an atheist, I have no conflict. I had assumed for a long time that an historical Jesus was well-established. That made no difference to my dismissal of the magical element to the story. On the other side, every Xian has their entire lifetime faith invested in the historicity of this one character. It's little wonder that impartiality and rigorous academic method is lacking from theologians. After investing some time on the subject, it turns out there is no reliable historical evidence for the historicity of Jesus. If there were a grain of truth to his 'miraculous' existence, there would've been massive contemporary and corroborating evidence - but there isn't. There's simply testimony from decades later, Christian poetry and some heavily interpolated writing. Jesus' existence is simply a massive assumption that is perpetuated by Xian apologists. +Phi Gamma Delta So nice to see an edit to this page that neither requires someone to have WP:Censor explained to them or is a revert of such an edit. +Neutrality Can we get a professional that's not employed by humanewatch.org to clean up this article PLEASE. +Thank you, Frank. I appreciate the offer, and I'm quite confident I would not be running into another Pastor Theo situation if I took you up on it. But I'd prefer to keep the number of people who can link the two accounts to an absolute minimum. So even though I do have the utmost trust in your discretion, I think/hope Alison's say-so will be enough to prevent people from thinking I'm you-know-who (or the other you-know-who) (or the other one) . +I will continue this on the article talk page. +Please explain why you're attributing the foes characterization of Fulbright and Marchetti to the reliable source whence that information about them derives. The reason the attribution is gratuitous is because WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV applies when there are conflicting POVs, which there aren't. You didn't attribute the other information you added in relation to Franklin, so why the attribution in Fulbright and Marchetti's case? Also note that the article was stable since April before the anonymous IP made a nonconstructive edit on 21 July. Your subsequent attempts to restore information that was removed months before is inconsistent with the spirit of consensus according to which Wikipedia is supposed to operate. Finally, your offer to list all the NPOV editors who agreed it was fine to leave in the IRmep reference won't be helpful. You need to demonstrate that the discussion concluded with something reasonably approaching consensus. If you can do that, by all means proceed.— +Trust me, Mr. wants the world to know he's gay. I'm on him hte minute he gets home from school. I wish you no ill will, but my son was on the computor at 3:16 this morning. That won't fly. He is learning a lot from these on-line debates. Are you? +See the news out today in the press: Un parque nacional español se cuela entre los 10 más visitados del mundo. He says the Teide is the 9th most visited in the world today. Do you have anything to say?.83.40.237.202 +We needs must be very careful to present these in historical context and without original synthesis, but they are notable to the topic of how parapsychology interacts with other disciplines. A less controversial (and less notable) parallel might be how music theorists have viewed the use of synthesizers in rock music over the last few decades. - 2/0 (cont.) +" We are trying to write an encyclopedia rather than curate a collection of external links. As previously mention DMOZ curates external links and we link to them. Maybe suggest adding your site there? If you wish to improve the content on Wikipedia there is a group of use willing to help. There are no other Bell's palsy sites listed here ? And have trimmed the ones on the other page. (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) " +" URL Update (update to my previous, and only, post) I checked today and verified that the ""original"" 'chucknorrisfacts' URL is working (vs. the 'replacement' URL mentioned in my previous post 'thechucknorrisfacts'.)" +Based on the above discussion it is abundantly clear that there is no consensus for insertion of the third criteria repeatedly inserted by disruptive edits ignoring the talk page completely. Also unacceptable is editing the list based on the new criteria within the same edit that changed it. +"It's extremely unfair. And I find it funny that you didn't bother to disagree that my name isn't on a list, or that my info was unfairly removed. Just a simple ""follow the rules."" " +" ""The WWE Raw guest host initiative was introduced on June 15, 2009 by Donald Trump during his time as owner of the Raw franchise."" This is Wikipedia all over. Listing stories as facts...Jesus Christ. Grow a brain, the first step might be to stop watching a product churned solely for children (not WWE, ALL PRO WRESTLING.86.128.14.112 " +" == Why the protrude user is accused to be evil? - Warum der vorstehende Benutzer als ""evil"" gilt?" +" Response I am obviously very disappointed by this decision. The assertion that I did not read the article is highly misleading, not to mention offensive. I have been a Wikipedia editor for many, many years, and have followed the rules and regulations throughout these years. To suggest that I did not follow the regulations is complete bunkum. Using the evidence present in the article, I made a choice based on what I thought was a fairly obvious case - it STILL breaks our rules on blogs, recentism, notability, and bias. The ""keep"" votes are from people who have an immense level of conflict of interest, and therefore skew the vote something rotten. I am very disappointed that this entire episode has been carried out at my expense, rather than at the article itself. This response will be copied to as many concerned editors in this matter. wordsdeeds " +" Removed, but funny enough to memorialize in the talk page This disease is also called a 3rd knee, a nob or ""splaggies"". " +I am not a martyr. I am a human, and humans make mistakes. I did too, many mistakes. +" Re: ""See also: One-hitter (smoking)"" Please discuss the following edit sequence: (cur | prev) 17:20, 8 July 2011 Mjpresson (talk | contribs) (10,343 bytes) (Tokerdesigner has resumed adding ""one-hitter"" when not contextual) (cur | prev) 17:16, 8 July 2011 Tokerdesigner (talk | contribs) (10,367 bytes) (See also: One hitter; fix Categorization (to Cannabis smoking)) What is ""not contextual"" about helping readers seeking information about ""Cannabis smoking"" find out about low-dosage utensils which can substitute for wasteful, unhealthy ""joint smoking""? Note that the same editor who deletes the link to the ""One-hitter (smoking)"" article has also deleted several pictures (of equipment other than cigarette papers!) from that article, deleted the Australian Department of Health warning against mixing with tobacco (in ""joints"") from the ""Hashish"" and ""Cannabis smoking"" articles, and positioned a ""person smoking a joint"" (cigarette advert) atop the ""Cannabis smoking"" article. Why? " +" Yes I quite agree on the subject of demons and deities but with with regards to the centenarians business I'm afraid I beg to differ. How do we know he doesn't have a lifespan of over a hundred years. He has certainly lived for more than that long even if he has been killed on the odd occasion. He had already lived for a century or more in Wind Waker. Furthermore I think Kaiju is debatable. The term Kaiju is Japanese for ""strange beast"" and as Ganon is indeed a strange fictional beast of Japanese origins he could be classed as a Kaiju. The Kaiju category is pretty much the same as the Fictional monsters category but it can also encompass creatures in mythology as well as fiction so by those standards I think the Loch Ness Monster and the classic European Dragon could be classed as Kaiju. " +March 2008 (UTC) I think you are both right. An ethnic group is a group of people with a subjective belief in a common descent (or if you like the perception of a common descent). To be an ethnic group a group does not have to have an actual common descent, only the belief in a common descent. There's also the meaning of descent, in anthropology descent does not by necessity have have to have a biological reality, some ethnic groups claim a common descent from gods, or totems. So I think that the English certainly are an ethnic group/nation because they have a perceived common ancestry. 09:25, 16 +NO! I DON'T CARE U BITCH!!! +How's this? It's a lot shorter, but it's more focussed on the settlement rather than the hall and is now properly sourced (bar the etymology). If you're ok with the changes, I can leave a copy of this conversation on the article's talk page. +" I have undeleted Paul ""Jah Screw"" Love and AfD'ed it : see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul ""Jah Screw"" Love. " +REDIRECT Talk:Harry Yates (footballer, born 1925) +" The bot does keep track, and will not update the same page more often than once every six months. You can make sure this doesn't happen again by adding to the main page; if an infobox is present and does not have an image in the ""image"" field, PhotoCatBot will assume that's the photo the article still needs, and will not add it to . Thanks! " +" Sorry I find that there's nothing ""honorable"" about samurai ethics, it's largely blind loyalty and fanaticism, and lack any of the Judeo-Christian values such as compassion and mercy. Such are the values indoctrinated into Imperial Japanese soldiers when they slaughtered over 300,000 Chinese civillians in the Nanjing Massacre, tortured Allied POWs in prison camps such as Changi, launched suicide Kamikaze attacks against Allied ships etc. Not even the Germans, who had at least at some Judeo-Christian values left even under the Nazi regime, match the level of fanaticism and pure evil of Imperial Japan.60.242.159.224 " +Realclearpolitics does a simple average (last five polls...not based on sort of timeframe. Though it shouldn't really matter at this point anyway). Link here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html 68.0.198.145 +HOE Your A slut hoe basstatard homo rapeist +request for checkuser Hi Got your name form checkusers list, I suspect following users to be involved in sockpuppetry and subsets of the following may be from same IP ,some of them are heavily involved in edit warring and disputes over fully protected article Dawoodi Bohra and other Bohra articles and giving other admins a hard time. One of the user Araz5152 created a hoax article [Qutbi bohra] which had to be completely transformed by another reliable author. So do let me know about the investigation Mufaddalqn SamanthaPuckettIndo Markdrows Md iet Murtazajamali DistributorScientiae Araz5152 +"""Oriental Republic of Uruguay"" is used by the CIA World Factbook. 58.70.49.169 " +REDIRECT Talk:Joe Williams (Cook Islands politician) +I am being stalked by an admin How do you prevent an admin with too much time on his hands and very little sense from stalking you? Why are neo-cons so often deranged and unwilling to face the truth? +Gibraltarpedia Could this be in another language as well? A picture? +reSID hompage link is dead, where has it gone? +maybe he's got better things to do than spend all day, every day on wikipedia? haha, it's been years now, get a life. just a thought from a concerned wikipedian... +I didn't remember it being in the anime and this article is about the Adventures Palmon only. So if it was in the anime than I'll put it in. +" Hey listen don't you ever!!!! Delete my edits ever again I'm annoyed because the WWE 2K15 a few of the roster have been confirmed and your stupid ass deletes what I write. just stop!!!! Please STOP!!!! You don't work 2k or WWE games so stop deleting other peoples shit if I get it wrong or others get it wrong let them they will get the hang of it eventually but don't stick your most ass in their and I'm gonna delete the ""please do not insert the roster"" shit how do you not have it if has been confirmed!!!!! God your stupid." +THE END OF DEMOCRACY to all those who read this message be warned as the tilte says the end of democracy is near. the legal sytem of the usa has allowed the citizen. you know what fuck this +So Far So Good It's not an encyclopedia page yet but still better than a magazine article and for all I could tell Abramoff is no more a member of the Elders Of Zion than he is an outer Pongolian Mongrel of Kakatoonian decent. +I see this as having been merged; undoing one side of a merge forks content in large blocks. See here and here where the article was merged. The prior merge notice indicated discussion, scant, at Talk:Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons) which I see you commented at. Yes, I feel that most of the leaf-nodes are utterly non-notable; this is what lists are for (and those lists should largely consist of unlinked critters). The D&D; 'verse has a near-endless number of named denizens and linking every one of them to a stub is absurd. The Aberration (Dungeons & Dragons) page has not been deleted; rather than simply undoing the merge, you are free to review the old versions of the page in order to mine them for bits you wish to add to the Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons) page. It would be nice if you cited sources establishing notability for anything you wish to resurrect. Cheers, +In Soviet Russia, vodka drinks you. +and i'm going to keep posting the stuff u deleted until this fucking site closes down have fun u stupid ass bitch don't ever delete anything fuckin hore like i said before go to hell +I'll be on IRC, too, if you have a more specific request. +" That site is footnoted with a ""copyright University of California Regents"" notice. They would have to release that copyright in order for the content to be used as is. " +Image:Barack-obama-mother.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barack-obama-mother.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. +" No he did not, read it again (I would have thought everyone here could recite it by heart by now) it says ""Are we truly to believe the arbcom are so thankful for that, and Jimbo was ever so taken with her"". The arbcom having read the evidence are now voting to thank her - so it is a very valid question. Kelly always implied she was a friend of Jimbo's. Good for her, that must be very pleasant for them both. However, I can't imagine Jimbo was particularly impressed by that blog either. If you actually read the blog, not just what was pasted to wiki, there is a lot of information on her views in other areas. I was also commenting on those. I don't imagine Jimbo is much impressed by me or many others concerned with whole rotten case either, but it's all a bit late for those concerns now. Now this is actually Bishonen's page, so my further views will be posted on my own page, if I decide to post them that is, because I too am heartily sick of this whole case, it is just a pity reference to that blog was ever permitted as evidence, especially if people do not in fact want to discuss it or here concerned parties views on it. " +" please identify what part of BLP applies because BLP clearly states that we must follow NPOV which says that we must present content in relation to the manner the subject is covered in reliable academic sources. In this case there has not been any substantial mainstream academic sources provided which is not critical of views and claims that Chopra makes. TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom " +I was not trying to edit anonymously. I was just trying to edit as myself. I also did not know that Cody could be a girl's name. That was an honest mistake. You should not block anonymous editing because you were not sure that it was me. This is said to be a site that anyone can edit. You do not understand what articles are useful if you think mine are not. You have no right to say that I cannot have a page for my film when there are movies on here that do not even have a trailer yet. At least my trailer will be out soon. +Deletion request. Can you delete my December 2008 archive? It doesn't have enough comments worth keeping. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eugene_Krabs/December_2008 - +World Snooker Plus champion is someone called James Dennison? Although the experiment never came close to rivalling the traditional game, Snooker Plus is still played by some. The current World Snooker Plus champion (as of January 2007) is James Dennison of Reading University and resident of Wantage Hall. Sounds like a load of bollocks to me. After searching the Internet, I have found no evidence of snooker plus tournaments, no evidence of a proficient snooker player called James Dennison, so I'm sure this is just a joke that someone thought they'd make waiting for the evening session of the 2007 Masters Snooker final. (Talk) +piperidine Hard times. You are welcome. 70.137.149.127 +Reason for deleting Content The reason I deleted the over-detailed content of that show is to be fair and equal to others shows like Eat Bulaga and Party Pilipinas in example and many more that are being tagged as over-detailed while these shows' page are let to be like that, that is considered biased and unfair. Wikipedia is here to inform and be resourceful, not biased and unfair. So, please have a second thought about actions to be done on this show and its Sunday variety equivalent. Thank you and good day! +" Proposed deletion of Exanimus It is not a good idea to add to pages where they have being removed, even if it is by the page's creator. Instead of WP:PROD, it must be WP:AFD. Thanks. 's talk " +Fixed Article was fixed. Thanks. +" Internal links don't need to be that fancy Please stop adding all those http:en.wikipedia.org/... links. One, those aren't external links; if they go anywhere, they go under a ""See also"" header. Two, internal links just go in square brackets like this: [[Toronto Transportation Commission]] so Toronto Transportation Commission. " +" false accusations, Historic Jonesborough, etc. Sorry to bother the current and future editors following this article, but it seems this article is to be added to a long list of articles where I have edited where long-time adversary Orlady follows and finds fault. I don't get her motivation. This to explain some back and forth editing on this article which you may see. 1. I added mention of the NRHP listing in 1969 of the Jonesboro Historic District, which she then disputed, adding a silly citation needed tag. As she is well aware from long discussion at the article for that district, it is NRHP listed, that is factual, it is not seriously in doubt. 2. I added general mention of the fact that ""A larger area has been promoted as ""Historic Jonesborough"" since then"", to which she added a wp:OR tag and/or removed it in subsequent edits. In one edit summary, Orlady stated that it ""is speculation and synthesis, including the concepts of ""larger,"" ""promoted as,"" and ""since then."" Not merely an issue of needing a citation."" Orlady has read numerous webpages of the Historic Jonesborough organization, which I believe was created after 1969 and which certainly has promoted a larger area than the NRHP-listed historic district as Historic Jonesborough since then. It is a fact, not even a controversial one that the organization has promoted an area since 1969, that the area is larger than the NRHP-listed historic district. The Historic Jonesborough webpages mention the historic district but do not name it, and they are i-think-deliberately vague on the boundaries of the district but nonetheless adequately imply that the Historic Jonesborough area is larger. Further, I have verified the facts by reading the NRHP nom document which identifies the area of the historic district, and compared that Historic Jonesborough documents promoting inns and motels inside and outside of that district. I don't think this amounts to wp:SYNTH which is original research, to be avoided as perhaps it might advance a controversial POV position. I believe the current article no longer mentions Historic Jonesborough, which ought to be given pretty salient coverage in the history of this town, for its actions to preserve and promote the town. 3. Orlady changes the name of the historic district to display as ""Jonesborough Historic District"" rather than to display as the name it was given in the NRHP listing, ""Jonesboro Historic District"". That change is possibly implementing wp:OR, as there appear not to be evidence the NRHP listing name is changed. There is discussion ongoing in a requested move at Talk:Jonesboro Historic District (Jonesborough, Tennessee); I think the official, original name should be displayed here unless and until there is a different resolution at the article on the district itself. Perhaps other editors would like to comment on what are the facts, and/or to step in to fix up the article. Or perhaps you all would prefer to avoid this. Again, sorry to have brought dispute to here. ncram " +|fukin arseholes dicks cunts die u priks +Bahaha, one warning? IS that all I get? Do your admin duties properly and unblock me now. +1. The IPA handbook is a work of phonetics, not phonology. 2. Yes, that is a serious proposal for palatalized vowelspublished by a serious linguist, whom I assuming doesn't use the moniker kwamigami at wiki. 3. You seem to have a very limited inflexible approach to this topic, which is unfortunate. Why can't you compass the idea of expanded discussion and alternative accounts (which might not agree with how to describe Japanese phonology)? And you wonder why so many people have given up on trying to improve linguistics pages at wiki?133.7.7.240 +Wouldn't that make for some miniscule fraction of a registered user (assuming the entire rest of the population of the planet as readers)? Are we all just sockpuppets of a single fractional mind? It would explain a lot. ........ +Since you can not read and extract details, do you want me to do that for you, also, you are ignorant, since everything I wrote prooved to be correct, everything I wrote you took down in the first place... +Another Three Revert Rule warning on Southern United States By my count you are again at three reverts on this article in the last 24 hours. If you revert again, I will again report you on the 3RR noticeboard. In such case, I suspect you would not get off with a warning. I would note that this time you are interacting with two different editors than in your last violation of 3RR less than 48 hours ago (and neither I nor Uncle Dick have any edits during this period). Please stop. The talk page is there for a reason. +"::::I also take note again that your claim to a consensus (above) to ""switch to your own version"", being based on your proposal, two vaguely encouraging editors, and my opposition, is illegitimate by any standards of what a consensus is. It is surprising that someone aspiring to Adminship could rely on such methods. " +"Hi. I'll be reviewing this article. Please just give me an hour or two to read through the article fully in order to give you a thorough review. Regards,  Chat  |" +45, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Agree on the 1st source. However, having a paywall is not an issue as far as the reliability of the source is concerned. No comment as to the appropriateness or not of this particular edit or source. Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access_to_sources 19 +, 19 April 2010 (UTC) I think that it's original intent was to make WP be enclyclopedic rather than a place to present new theories, ideas and arguments. Then it jumped the tracks. 03:03 +I added encyclopedic content. You keep deleting it. You demanded I source the material. I did, not because I obey you, o fellow volunteer editor, but because I wanted to. You then claim copyright violation on public-domain material posted at archive.org, of lyrics which were taken from what is clearly the public domain poem Purple Cow of the 1890s. Fuck off, cunt. If you want, I'll accuse you of ill will in a broader wikipedia forum. Bring it on. +Sweet, glad that's resolved. +Didn't call it abuse of administrator's rights at all, ever? As I said, there was no consensus in the AFD as of yet. In addition, you clearly don't understand what the purpose of an AFD is. A person disagreeing with consensus and presenting alternative arguments is perfectly fine. In the case of the AFD you're referring to, I presented an argument about his notability that is perfectly solid based on our established guidelines for biographies. Just because a person disagrees with you doesn't mean that it's abuse of powers or disruptive. +" Yuri Stern I looked over the article, and it seems ok. I don't know very much about Yuri Stern, but I think the article is written well enough. [[User talk:DLand|TALK]] " +, and thanks for taking the time +Why do you love the IBO so much? It's not a legitimate boxing sanctioning body, and is not recognized by any credible boxing outlets. +I'm sick of your Britanniphobic edits! I'm getting extremely sick of your avowedly Britanniphobic edits especially in relation to my numismatic articles! Please stop this at once! - ( ) +Tanya Gold is Jewish As she says herself in this reference on the Guardian website. Stop blanking this fact from her article. - +Final Fantasy Legend III? I seem to recall reading in an interview with Woolsey that his first project with Square was in fact Final Fantasy Legend III (aka SaGa III), the B&W; Game Boy game. +Copyright problem This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. – ☎ +" Help with CSS Reference Manual article Dear editor, this morning, I found a new article (CSS Reference Manual) initiated by another author (that I am not acquainted to). However, while the article was at that point (and this moment as well) clearly still 'work in progress', another editor/commenter had put an 'AfD' on it. Because I feel a strong need for this new article to exist, I defended it strongly with valid arguments, even stating that I wanted to contribute to it myself. However, at the point where on-topic discussions based on argumentation seized to exist, the editor/commenter started to attack me personally, by openly questioning my personal credibility. At his talk-page, an earlier ban (half way of the page) is present based on personal attacks (although I am not fully sure that he was the one given the ban or that he was the one that gave the ban to someone else). Nevertheless: because of this AfD, the article gets flamed now by other users that don't take a closer look at it, for no valid reason, just because it's currently labeled as 'AfD'... My question is therefore: could you help me out to let this article be enhanced properly to Wikipedia standards? Because I strongly feel that there is a need for it, it deserves a decent chance, because I would not liketo see very hard work thrown down the drain because of ""a bully"" that was banned before for personal attacks, and because the article's initial author (again: not me) has done a good job in starting it." +User pages Just a reminder that the purpose of a user page (like (, so you should not consider your user page to be a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing may be removed or deleted. As of now, you've made all of 5 article edits in 3-1/2 months and yet have made 62 edits to your user page to add 83 userboxes. In other words, you have over sixteen times the number of userboxes as you do actual article edits which is NOT the sign of an active editor. Again, content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing may be removed or deleted, and that includes user pages of non-editors. Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information. | Talk +? I also need help uploading this picture that I don't know how to do http://www.talentondisplay.com/girls/JadinWong.jpg +"*I want to echo reading over the reliable sources guidelines. The problem is that almost all of the sources you added to the article for Devil Shit are inappropriate for Wikipedia in general in various ways. Merchant sources such as iTunes are wildly inappropriate to use as sources in any way, shape, or form. Their primary purpose is to sell you something and regardless of the information they impart, they should never be used as a reliable, trivial, or even primary source. Secondly, the YouTube links are almost entirely unusable as many are not uploaded by the people that created the music or represent the artist. This is seen as a copyright violation and it's also something that shouldn't be linked to. In almost every case the only time you should link to a video is if it gives notability... which none of these do. Thirdly, the rest of the links are primary, which will never, ever, ever give notability. Never. You could have a primary source that establishes that someone won a Grammy for a devil shit song, but it still can't give notability. You should only list primary sources after you have a reliable source posted by a non-involved second party. The other problem is that with a lot of these sources the claims of devil shit aren't backed up in the actual source. For instance, this Twitter account doesn't say anything about the artist creating anything in this music genre. Saying that the artist performs devil shit based solely on the Twitter account is considered to be original research. You need reliable second party things that back up the information, but even then you have to understand that verification that the genre is performed by notable or non-notable persons is not enough to show notability for the genre to have an article. A genre can exist, but existing is not notability. Even if you re-add all of the sources and the performers without Wikipedia articles, that won't show that the genre is notable. If anything, it actually does a little more to injure the case here than to show notability. If you have 80+ sources, all of which are unusable for notability purposes and most of which are linked to performers that don't have articles (which many automatically presume means ""non-notable"" even if this isn't the case), then this tends to make many automatically assume that the topic in question is less notable, which means that they might not search as hard as they otherwise would. It's not right that this happens, but it happens. Sometimes in AfDs less is more. (｡◕‿◕｡) " +dont listen to this fage he said nicole atkins http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Atkins wasnt a notable musician on my talk page so he fails +" Speedy deletion of ""Slatecast.com"" A page you created, Slatecast.com, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. (talk/contribs) " +Message Thanks for the message. Have fun out there! 22:01, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) +WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT SUPPORT FREE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!! BOYCOTT THIS SITE AND TELL EVERYONE!!!! WIKIPEDIA WILL PULL DOWN ALL OPPOSING VIEWS OF THE BARRY ADMINISTRATION>>>>>THEY ARE LEFTIST, SOCIALIST BUMS!!!! +Pov deletions I am amazed by the amount of ignorant comments to justify deleting the sources about Egyptians. The Arabist pov pushing is relentless, even when the source is an Arab_Net site from Saudi Arabia!!! I see the academic source was deleted too. Unbelievable!! If you don't understand something you read, find someone to help you understand it. If it bursts your bubble, well that might be a good thing. Knowledge is a dangerous thing, ain't it! +" If you'd actually take the time to look around, you'd see that from the RS Wikia is responsible for creating these images. It's called Video Screen Capturing with a screen recorder, then importing the recorded movieclip to something like Flash and editing it, then exporting it as an Animated GIF. And OhanaUnited, if I didn't have to assume good faith, I'd be giving you an earful about your ""source code"" comment." +":Crimethinc should be included but not in the section its in. Crimethinc isn't an ideology, it's an organization of many people that promotes certain ideologies, lifestyles, and tactics. It is arguably the most active distributer of anarchist ideas today, especially among youth, but as was already said there is no ""crimethincism"". Crimethinc says this in another, quite artistic way, on one of their trailers for the book ""Days of War, Nights of Love"" which which they more or less say ""What is crimethink? Anything that can't be bought, sold, or faked. What is Crimethinc? Crimethinc is the black market where love, beauty (etc.) are traded for lives..."" In other words, Crimethinc sees itself as a means to promote widespread crimethink, which isn't far from its original definition from Orwell's 1984, that is, humanism and rebellion against hierarchy. " +Pig That pig looks scary shit , hehe +REDIRECT Talk:Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela +" Reception > Box Office Section ""Third-highest non-sequel opening day revenue of all time"" Is this really relevant here, given the years and years of TV produced? The point of this statistic is for a new story or concept, to show that it can bring in new audiences, but The Simpsons surely cannot fall into this category so simply..." +I had a good one up there, until some dipshit decided to change back to this joke they'd call a mosaic. PacificWarrior101 +Stop to be a crybaby. You messed the article with wrong information. Fix it. This is not Brazil. +YOU'RE NO FUCKING METAL LORD DUMBASS YOU'RE A FAG FUCK YOU. +Carlson and NEARA aren't reliable sources for anything but their opinions. Carlson is often wrong. +Thanks for your support. The good news is that I have found a private communication route with the top echelon. I will go easy as you said, and work on preparing something for the big guys. +^I think it's a guy. Not entirely sure. +Please don't spread any lies. I removed the request from WP:RM, where I had originally placed it following discussion on this talk page, only after the page was moved — and not by me. Besides, your apparent disagreement with a previous page move does not warrant a page move to the previous location without discussion. If you'd care to look up the Netherlands in other source material, you'd find that the name of the country is THE Netherlands, not Netherlands. 10:26, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC) +Yes, for the record, I acknowledge that my latest outburst was completely unjustified, since Wikipedia policy specifically allows removal of requests for medical or legal advice. (This is NOT to be construed as an apology to Baseball Bugs, which I am not making and never will.) However, as far as double jeopardy, this applies regardless of Wikipedia policy it stems from my Constitutional rights as an American. So while you could convert the block into an indefinite ban, you can ONLY do this in case of further wrongdoing on my part. 24.5.122.13 +Mayday/Air Crash Investigation as a source It was discussed here. Mayday's producers have in at least one show made up things out of whole cloth namely the show on PSA Flight 182 stating the crew of the 727 that crashed had violated sterile cockpit rules. The NTSB report says nothing on that subject. I've watched many of the episodes, and there were other factual mistakes. So what I said earlier still applies- Mayday isn't a WP:RS. +You Smell== You Smell == +Judaism rejects section Judaism rejects assertions that Jesus was the awaited Messiah, arguing that he did not fulfill the Messianic prophecies in the Tanakh.[21] Should read Some branches within Judaism rejects... Ok since a christian wrote this and since it is true, the admins can ignore it and delete it like they do everything that disagrees with them.69.14.96.9 No all of Judaism rejects this as there are many who are Messianic Jews. +answer: Gay people like me. +Good proposal if you've got material to write such a section with,from your knowledge of his critics. It means his work gets reviewed in a pro and con way. As an ideas man you'd expect him to favour that! +Thanks for the info on the Old Believers. However, I did read somewhere that they had more or less assimilated into Latgale society. Which explains why they did not leave when Latgale became territory of the Russian Empire. As Old Believers did elsewehere - some of them fled from the Tsar all the way to Mexico. As should already have been clear from my German link, Neu-Letgallen may have been an estate or soem castle at the beginning, but it was definitely used as the name of a village in the area. Jewish material on the web: http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/Pinkas_latvia/pinkas_latvia.html pgp +" A barnstar for you! The Editor's Barnstar Congratulations, CodeCat, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for improving the coverage of linguistics in the encyclopedia, adding IPA notations to articles, and for all your contributions. Keep up the great work! " +I Need To Be Adopted!!! +" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Mate i am pissed off. Really fucking pissed off Request handled by: 109.157.132.41 Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." +":[You wrote] The article looks nice, and the grammar is good. The sentences are a little long, and I would suggest that some of them be broken up a bit. If you are actually in this area, some pictures of the interior, or pictures of what it used to look like might add to the article. As well, if you can (find) historical references to it, that might add nicely to the article as well. Overall, it's pretty snazzy. I like it. ) Arcayne I added a couple of pictures like you suggested including a few more facts from its history. Thanks for the feedback.  talk  " +for dealing with Gavin Colon +what they speak behind your back when they're ripping you off; Hebrew is what they speak when they're drinking the blood of Catholic babies. Yiddish is +Hello, I am a student at the school whos IP address is blocked. It sounds to me from all the requests to stop that no one realized this is a school IP. I will be creating an account of my own later at home and will uphold to the rules and guidelines. However, it amazes me how many admins didnt treat this as a shared school IP. Good Luck With Fighting the vandals! - Nick +We could start here. ♫ talk contribs +http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AChanging_username&diff;=92790566&oldid;=92769124 never come back, or else you'll be revealed! bastard...that's also for you Khoi +Agree. I had the same idea about Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia before. I'll contact you when I am done. Thank you for your effort. +March 2007 (UTC) Image tagging for Image:Surrey shield.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Surrey shield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:12, 20 +Sorry, IE 7 beta keeps logging me out. All the comments from 60.226.232.118 are from me. +"141.166.153.89, you said it yourself, it is ""not... a legit country"", though ""it is a government"" that governs territory. For this very reason, it is wrong to have it listed under ""countries..."", as it goes against the fact. Now, if it were to be removed completely, it would be considered POV because some people advocates for Taiwan Independance. Therefore it should be in the ""partially recognized..."". I suggest changing its name to ""partially reconized states"" or something similar, but I don't know, this should be discussed. " +Your version of truth may be very different from another person's version of truth. +" What are you talking about, Darkstar? Not all conservatisms are free-market; ""liberal"" outside the U.S. means pro-freemarket policies. All the original right-wingers were statists and more or less virulently anti-freemarket; even an anarcho-socialist like me acknowledges that, whatever we think of raw capitalism. It is an American delusion that conservatism is an exclusively free-market ideology. | Talk " +" Geez Hesp, as well as being a coward you are a little paranoid, sorry very paranoid, you should also call your Mummy and Daddy. In case you are stupid as well as paranoid and a coward, speaking face to face is the old fashoined way of sorting out problems as opposed to hiding behind a pretty name in a cyber veil; you pathetic little excuse for a man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregjay (talk • contribs) Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hesperian""" +" I like moving down & clarifying the ""not a state function"" part as this is meaningless to the general reader. Something about microscopic constituents should stay because it is a good pedagogy for visualizing what heat can be (even if not in the most general case). Dissipative is important and slightly easier to understand than not a state function but could be explained. Is this meant to address my concerns in previous section, or is it separate from that? " +Hi, Alphachimp, I have a question for you. I reverted some previous changes on some pictures of FF8 articles and that ticked off some people although I didn't mean to. I still want to keep them through. What do I do? -Eileen- +April 2012 (UTC) I see we have a file back in its place - I agree I dont really see the need as there is link to the main article, but nor do I see any harm in it being here. However this is not the norm nor is there even an infobox field for it. SO i guess i am impartial about its inclusion or exclusion, but do think a good version should be selected if inclusion is the wish of the majority here on this article. 01:12, 22 +"Much of the history article is taken directly from Hillsdale's website, and I would agree that much of it reads like an advertisement, but, in all fairness, there really hasn't been enough published on Hillsdale apart from the college itself. I have tried doing EBSCO host searches and have looked for titles in my university library (the largest library in my state, mind you), and I have been unable to find a single title that is exclusively about Hillsdale College. I suspect the reason is that, while it was once a radical college, it has become more conservative as the world has changed. It was expected to become more radical, in the way that Antioch College did; but it didn't. I think that the best solution is for outsiders to acknowledge Hillsdale's impressive history while still writing about it from an objective point-of-view. If there are other people willing to write about the school, there will be less need to visit the ""Imprimis"" website to compose a wikipedia article on the subject. " +you will burn in hell you are a nazi piece of shit and your actions are abysmal rot in hell evil scum +I'll start combing through the articles and adding any templates I see to the ToDO page. I also think the Todo page may need to be reformatted to conform to the various tags instead of general desciptions. +" What makes you say that? I just looked at the deletion debate. It was strongly in favor of ""Keep"" votes, as far as I could tell. In fact, I was hoping you would participate in the debate and add another ""Keep"" vote. I am a little confused. If it is mostly ""Keep"" votes, why would that make you stop caring? Let me know. Thanks. ( )" +" Oppose Inconsistent with other, similar comparison articles, listed and linked higher up in the discussion (see topic 19). Once again, you are making a general complaint ""rampant original research"", I believe, is unfounded and, I find, unhelpful. If it were true, changing the article title would be a completely inadequate method of resolving it. " +Megadeth Hi, thank you for the message, yes can you discuss with me on the albums talk page cheers. +" Also, be careful to always use an ""Additional references"" tag, not an unsourced one, when an article has at least one citation. 220.255.2.125 " +Village? If it is a hamlet, it cannot be a village! +Stalking I asked you to stop bothering me. You then posted more drivel on my talk page. Unlike your cowardly 'running off to teacher', I'll give you fair warning - add anything else and I'll involve an admin to have you stopped. You are an obsessive, little weirdo - go away. +This was the first time for me & it was very hilarious. +fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck yo +Oh how are you gonna explain to your kids when they get older that they got a pussy and failure for a father ? hahaha. This is too easy. +" And you really need to familiarize yourself with Randy because what I said after all the HELL he's put many, many editors and admins through is silly for you to ""warn"" me about. He's a vandal, a major vandal, and ""#7"" was just another episode of his. You should also familiarize yourself with the unreliability speculation of Jason47@aol and Grant Chuggle. If you did, you would know that I didn't violate anything. Anyone claiming to be Jason47 is a vandal or here to simply harrass people. I guess he won. Silly that someone like that is allowed to come to my page and I'm not allowed to comment. " +" Correction in UKRAINE section of RUSSIFIED Names Hi Jim1138, I am new to this, so if u can help then that would be great 0) The changes I am trying to make are in the Ukraine section. I noticed that all the names used are still the Russian (or ""Russified"") names that reflect the ""Russification"" process of WW2, etc. I know what names are correct because I am a Ukrainian native speaker. But for documentation purposes you can verify that the correct Ukrainian names were officially recognized by the US State Dept in 1997 (I do not know the exact document number). There is an excellent article that refers to exactly this issue in the following newspaper article: http://www.evalleyvoice.com/docs/ValleyVoiceJune2011.pdf Please scroll down to page 4 to read it. Thus, other names that should be corrected, for example are: Lvov should be LVIV Ternopol should be TERNOPIL Chernobyl should be CHORNOBYL etc-etc These changes should also be made in the main block of INFO on Ukraine (at top-right), so that the capital is correctly listed as ""Kyiv"" (and NOT as Kiev). This would mean also correcting the sections/pages on Kyiv alone, as well as the pages for the ""Chornobyl Nuclear Accident"" (which still also uses the incorrect Russian name of ""Chernobyl"") These may seem like minor trivialities, but if Wikipedia is to continue to be the excellent resource it is, then this needs to happen.... and it seems only fair to the millions of Ukrainians around the world to whom these names 'belong' (much as we would not want names of US cities to be listed only in Icelandic ;0). In light of recent events in Ukraine, I think these correction take on a special sense of immediacy when one considers the struggle Ukraine currently is facing against Russian aggression. The names, like those of any country, are a viatl part of their innate identity. Being a novice, I'm not sure I'm the right person to do these changes, but perhaps you and your people have someone who is adept at doing what is probably an easy cut/replace (for thos who know how to do such things). Thank you in advance for your kind help! 0) 75.82.202.53 " +Keys? I'm not familiar with the piece myself so am not fit to make edits, but I notice that the discussion of the first movement includes mention of some very outlandish keys like D-flat minor, D-sharp major, and F-flat major, all of which, while touched on occasionally in fleeting chromatic passages, are very unlikely to be a piece's true modulatory goal. I suspect that someone who thought it would be funny has added these in. If I am wrong in this suspicion and the piece really does go to all those unnecessarily heavy keys, ignore this comment. 76.118.3.9 +" A tag has been placed on Dylan carter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " +I really enjoy licking penis. I routinely check into hotles with she-males in order to get rammed by them also. After all, my name is uncle dick. +" Something like the ""new message"" thing at the top of your talk page. " +As far as I'm concerned theres a line between vandalism and improper procedure GhettoDaxx +Wikiwankers Sitush, material scientist and co, you do not own Wikipedia. You have had serious complaints against you proven, I have not. There are over 30,000 editors and a dozen or so of your chum administrators cannot overrule the rest of us. WE do not need to comply with YOUR rules because YOU do not speak for everyone. Wikipedia Is not your personal toy. If you think it is please reply in detail explaining how I can process my complaint against the Sitush Club. ( ) +Congratulations! I know you'll take concerns that were raised into account in the future. Welcome back! +" Sophie Moss About contacting me, assuming you have enabled email in your user preferences, you should be able to go to my user page and send me an email from there. If this doesn't work I'll forward an email address to you. Regards, + " +Circumflex vs macron I keep coming across Tongan words spelled with circumflex accents over vowels. Notably in translation tables in the English Wiktionary. I just want to check with experts here whether the circumflex was formerly an official way to denote a long vowel, or whether the macron has always held this role with the circumflex just being used as an ad-hoc replacement due to macrons not being available on English typewriters and computer keyboards. — +Unprotected Under his probation, Messhermit is banned from editing this article. Since the protection was instituted as a result of that edit warring, I have unprotected it. Tony Sidaway +some people get to see it early. +I do not blame you. I was basically gang raped by Padenton who should have done a partial revert. I will be slowing down on Wikipedia as I have more important things in the real world to deal with. +ok uhhhhh....... kojicrap? or kojigirl or krappydude. one of those. User:Big foot123456789 +If you just named things Mega Drive and Mega CD it would solve a lot of issues ) +Thanks for taking the time to edit that first paragraph I thought you had removed everything, I quoted that number from The Time magazine. I am satified with the current edit. +Venezuela, I'm curious for feedback on using translated tweets as citation. +What kind of idiots are you, Do not delete that page or kick your asshole... motherfucker. >:( +I'm sorry, you're wrong. Here are the statistics of police-recorded crime in the UK Their own words confirm what I said: The majority of crimes are property related. Vandalism accounts for 26% of all BCS crime (two-thirds of which is vehicle vandalism); criminal damage accounts for one in five (20%) of crimes recorded by the police.Vehicle-related theft accounts for 14% of all BCS crime. Offences against vehicles account for 13% of recorded crime. Burglary accounts for 7% of all BCS crime and 12% of recorded crime. Violent crime represents around a fifth (20%) of BCS crime. Violence against the person also accounts around a fifth (19%) of police recorded crime. Source: http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/statistics/statistics080a.htm 69.228.251.134 +Thank you for experimenting with the page Cartesian coordinate system on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. +or can someone please any my block review. Since you two were involved in the block, I thought one of you could. I did what Swarm told me so can I at least have the condolence of a response? +United World Chart Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS, to any article.— +(Illuminati) It should mention him being invoved with the illuminati. +" The Treaty of Limerick It is sometimes forgotten, that with Sarsfield and the other ""Wild Geese"" gone,and with the Treaty of Limerick broken, one of Western Europe's most savage bodies of legislation (with the possible exception of laws designed to persecute the Jews)collectively known as ""The Penal Laws,"" was introduced, designed to reduce the Catholic Irish to a stte of abject misery. Any reputable historian of 18th century Ireland can be consulted and the worst horrors of that legislation examined! The repeal of the last of the Penal lawswas only completed in 1829, when the Catholic, Kerry barrister, Daniel O'Connell took his seat in the House of Commons (Catholic Liberation). (As can be seen from from the page on Ireland and the Jews, O'Connell also supported legislation, designed to remove discrimination against the Jews.) Finally, please note that I have sent an email(November 2,2005) to the BBC, re their page on the Williamite Wars, and in particular, the final line, ""...a century of peace ensued in Ireland."" To date, I have received a letter (email) of acknowledgement; but no change has occurred on the BBC site (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/timelines/ni/aughrim.shtm). " +Chasing Pandora What's wrong with you? You've deleted my article for Chasing Pandora. Although at first I copied the text directly from their website, then I noticed my mistake and rewritten the article in my own words. +cunt. thought id leave you a message before i obv get banned cos you have ur head up wikipedia's arse. your a fuck up with no life who spends all day editing wikipedia cos your an ugly fat gay who has nothing else to do, you need to grow up and get alife you immature little brain dead cunt, noone likes u in real life and sucking off editing pages on wikipedia isnt going to help you sort your shitty little life out, SO get off the computer, go outside and get a girlfriend, you may then stop licking off your computer ) With loveeee, jto29xxxx +To Gamaliel I see Wyss has now deleted all my recent posts on his page - without (he claims) even reading them. One of the posts was asking him to explain where the Sollog prophecies were wrong (I linked to them). This he deleted without reading it. It's pointless - I give up. Please could you tell me where I complain to and also perhaps you'd do it if you can do it easily, please delete every single post I have ever made on the Talk Sollog pages as it's pointless trying to do anything there. I'd be better off elsewhere. Wiki is not 'out of control' - it's 'too much in control' and the accusations of Wiki Cult certainly have some bearing. 17:05, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) +":To the unsigned poster above: If a person does not qualify for combatant status, they become subject to the criminal law applicable. That means they can be arrested, tried and sentenced, but Geneva Convention 4 prohibits punishment without due process. To confirm what 3mta3 said, it also provides that: ""Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal."" (Geneva Convention 4, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/375?OpenDocument). It's quite true that there used to be a tradition of summary execution for violations of IHL, but that's no longer official policy in ""civilized"" armed forces. But I'm getting a teeny bit off-topic ;-) " +I think Tripoli is in the wrong spot on that map. I'm pretty sure Tripoli is in what is today Libya, and not Palestine. +Baron Hill. Baron Hill is a notable resident of Seymour. +"::""Much appreciated! I've gotten my share of abuse and tend to be thick skinned, but that's was just outrageous for me."" I'm sorry, just how much do you spend online? Gee, you have world to see, as a person like you is likely to be called a pee-u-tee-ay more than once a day. ;) " +I wrote an article about Debora Hammond, because we spoke of here. Maybe you can take at it. Greetings - +So, you agree with me that it's stupid to let administrators unblock themselves? +. Also, since it is my page, and I am writing an opinion dealing with a topic I contribute much too, I think I have the right to have it there +" Perhaps it was the time frame. I recall the first I reported had made some vandal edits the previous month. He already had two warnings from then. Someone skipped the third and gave him the fourth, so I reported to AIV when he made another vandal edit and it was rejected for not having the full set of warnings. Soon after that, I reported someone that had only the third and fourth warning and that one was rejected as well. They had a lot of vandal edits, but only the two warnings. Since then, I only report if they have the full set. Maybe I should just start going for it and see how it goes now. Love " +Publicwatchlist (script) That watchlist was last updated on 15 March, something's wrong? Oh, and is it possible to somehow hide my own edits from the watchlist I see? +oops I didn't request a new IP from dhcp, anyway I'll do that now. SEE YOU MOTHER FUCKERS LATER! +The passages I deleted are obvious opinionated violations of WP:OR and are not presented as direct quotes from any source at all. I still don't understand what it is that you're defending. +" Am I supposed to personally not edit anything at all if I have my IP changed? It feels kind of weird to do it that way, heh. Are you sure about that part? Is the person himself blocked, literally, since you can't really know who I am. [talk] " +The Neuremberg laws allowed full citizenship to anyone with 1 grandparent of Jewish origin. Because his grandmother was Jewish means nothing. Only SS members were required to have no Jewish ancestors. This was not the case in the other military branches. +" Thanks. I went ahead and made the change, and also updated the ""Jokeri"" re-direct page. " +Wrong. I didn't mention it because you're wrong. This is exactly what I'm talking about right here. My complaint will remain here until I get a real administrator to deal with it. +Nope. It should be trimmed per wp:plot as it cannot have an article until passing wp:notability. +Taking silence for consent, or at least non-objection, I'm making the swap. +The map below shows countries where conservative governments denied global warming in red. +I'm just reading a bit further: I'm surprised that this restriction has only applied since 1999. Surely the UGLE have held this position for a long time? Presumably since their inception or shortly after?!! +Modern Usage Maybe someone can add how hanging in modern times (at least in the U.S.) has fallen out of favor as a means of execution? +This event was a war, an internal war, between Jamaica's armed forces and a drug cartel called Shower Posse. +Changes If nobody has objection, i am going to make some changes in this article (look to academic sources).(Tofaan-توفان) +The problem is you did not identify those as his quotes, nor did you make any point - did you want them included in the article in some way? If so, say where and why. The article talk page is not a forum for airing of anyone's opinions about the subject - it is for discussion how to edit the page. I'm sorry, but your entries were incomprehensible. |talk +LOL. A way to slap a whole group of people in the face is to name a game intended to demonstrate human miss communication after that group. +The fact is that an unaccredited school not recognized in the United States or any other reputable medical facility in the world is never going to sound good whatever the tone. It sounds bad no matter what. Fact is that just because the facts aren't favorable doesn't make the piece biased. The Pov rating is biased as it gives the wrong impression that the article isn't 100% factual. If you know any thing positive in the face of these facts you're welcome to tell us what it is. But a school that offers you a degree that is recognized nowhere in the US or many other places in the world is tough to make a case for. +" Compromise I have told you before that I am all for the name Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac if certain conditions are met (which weren't last time around). I am willing to change my vote on the conditions that the title stays the way it is if the rest of the article only mentions Assyrians (outside religion section), because we can't constantly switch back and forth between ""Assyrian"" ""Syriac"" ""Assyrian/Syriac"" and ""Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac"" throughout the article because it gets really repetitive and annoying to the normal reader. Also every other page dealing with Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriacs has to say Assyrian as well in the article while the title can stay the way they are (Assyrian/Syriac in Blah). Does that sound good? Anyways, Edokh Brikha! " +Well, mea clupa. Unfortunately I mixed it up ) +No. It's clear that I am not the only person who has a problem with your style of editing, I don't understand why you won't reconsider your methods. +" Re: Black Holes No problem. Don't worry about my aestethics as much, that's just me griping, but a peer review can do loads to help an article. Like I said, I liked the album, and want to see it get FA too... if I still had access to my ProQuest account I would have been happy to give you some print sources for use, unfortunately I don't have it anymore. ( Good luck, (talk) " +. Neither would I consider it a lie because I heard them from Hagin. This is the way of the Spirit. We are to hear the Spirit of God however He chooses to speak through His Word and His men +Ass face Dear Mr. Public, I highly detest your myopic interpretation of the validity of my contributions to Mr. Harmon's (Jesus') various assholes. Thank you and yours truly, John Kerry +So you are saying that you will revert war to have your way then? +May 2008 /Blaxthos ( t / c ) +Painting in the Americas Good catch, I started a section at History of Painting called Painting in the Americas it's after Western painting and before Islamic painting. Please work on it when you can, I will too. +":::The title of the page is: ""Privatization Issues"" and it correctly involves out-sourcing which is also called contracting out. Your arguments are not logical and are very polemical. You don't seem to accept reason (by the way Reason is one of my sources and they are pro-Privatization) and not a Union. " +mayor of garden home It isn't nonsense. I am the mayor of Garden Home. Do your research. +Not understood. What should they say about whether it occurs naturally, and why? Please elaborate. +Proposed deletion of Frank Harts Hello, Senatorharts. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Frank Harts, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Frank Harts to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page. Thanks, +zionist jew please stop spreadin your lies, bias, and propaganda. your a zionist jew, that suports the terrorist state of israel, and you want our nations to help your sorry state. im digusted at your posts in the Israel discussion page, almost makes me puke! zionists are going to cause armageddon to us ALL! and even if your not Israeli, i know your a zionist, because your views about Israel, are BIAS! Zionists are obviously going to want the destruction of Palestine, and support the mass genocide of INNOCENT palestinians! Were fighting your war in IRAQ! youve tricked our nations in suporting your terrorist state. You probaly also want the creation of the old ISRAEL baxck to, which involves the invasion of countries like SYRIA, IRAQ ...hmmm maybe thats why your starting wars with them, and stereling oil, by creating OIL pipes! be ashamed you ZIONIST! for the sake of humanity86.139.179.254 ! +Various people have tried to explain to you that your edits are not acceptable, but you've continued in the same vein. If you vandalize another article, we can only assume that this account was created solely for the purpose of disrupting Wikipedia, and it will be permanently blocked. | Talk +" McCloskey Why is what I added about McCloskey an ""attack"" rather than important information? I provided documentation for each point, and it is a very contentious controversy. Are you saying it is okay for her to say whatever she wants, but it is not okay to show how she contradicts herself?" +" Facts can work wonders in developing awareness. ""Israeli offensive in Gaza"" receives 26 allintitle google news hits and ""Israeli assault on Gaza"" receives 8 hits. Meanwhile, ""Gaza war"" receives 1,764 hits. " +was the first time ive seen them since 2002, when... you know. Now I'm dying for the new +One more time I am asking everybody to concentrate on improving the article. So far I have seen only the sources found by user:betsythedevine. I agree on adding more medical information, but we should keep in mind that this article is not about mass hysteria, this article is about blood libel against Israel. I was accused for using mostly Israeli POV sources. Please add more information from Arab POV sources. Let's make the article less POV. +" No, the planning took place in response to the Winter War. The British government may have been half hearted as Nick-D says, but certainly not the French nor the British public and press. From the Doerr paper Paul cites: ""The reaction of the British public and press to the Soviet invasion of Finland was overwhelmingly hostile. Sympathy for Finland was strong. The Finns were seen as a small, embattled liberal state defying a totalitarian power. As the Finns battled against increasingly long odds, pressure grew on the British government to do something. Military supplies were sent to Finland along with some British volunteers. By March 1940 public pressure and pressure from the French forced the British government to agree to a wild plan to send British troops to Finland."" Do not forget that the French were considered a major military power in 1939, so while the British may have been reluctant, I don't see why we should ignore the French pressure for intervention. " +Wikiedia has told me several times that FACTS are not important, but reliable sources ARE. +You European! For the last time we aren't the same person. No I haven't left, Im not confused, and you're making a personal attack at me. your rude comment has already been removed. Never gonna stop +The article Car Vs. Driver has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. +Alright, I'll attempt to look to see if I can find any information supporting it, and see If theres a more appropriate location for the information. Thanks. +Photo upload Hey Abhishek, if you have, please upload some photos for Gautam Adani and Mukesh Jagtiani articles. Thanks. +I believe I understand the nature of our disagreement, now. Please carry on. +I'm not certain, but blocks probably remain logged indefinitely. Can you provide any more details about how this happened? +Yes but it was only one edit, and the Ip changes everyday. So a 6 month block is useless. +" I have added some points based on Chantal Nadeaus book ""Fur Nation"". Its available as well on books, so have a look, BR " +And exactly why do you think they are sock puppets of me? Because they don't support your views? It's just like at Dutch declension were they blocked all the users that didn't support there views. How sad? +Response When I delete another editor's message from my talk page, it serves as a receipt to you and to everybody else that I have read and thus, I acknowledge what you have written. I do not normally respond to other editors unless they have a particular question. If they leave just a comment, then I do not normally give a response. Rest assured, I do read each and every one of them. Regards. +A plasma question Sorry to bother you, but I was impressed with your command of plasma physics on the plasma talk page, and I was wondering if you could answer a question for me. In a one atmosphere uniform glow Discharge plasma (OAUGDP) what is the voltage drop for a large current, say 1000 amps, running across it? Is there an equation that one could use to compute this for different voltages? Thanks a lot for your patience. cc +'Shock jock' disrupts BBC's Sunday Politics show +"This is the first time I've seen Pour un Québec lucide specifically associated to ""separatists"". " +" A second opinion will brought in to see if this qualifies to continue review. Status This section is supposed to be edited only by reviewer(s). Any questions and comments concerning this table should be posed in Discussion subsection below. {|class=""wikitable"" style=""text-align:left"" |- valign=""top"" ! width=""30"" | Rate ! width=""300""| Attribute ! | Review Comment |- valign=""top"" | colspan=""3"" | 1. {{GATable/item|1b|n| In the introduction, ""As an example, let's represent a number of eggs by the letter..."" Let's? this isn't a Wikiversity page." +Fuck off Mexican bastard! I will work endelessly to have your Wikipedia account banned indefinitely- you have made my life a misery and I hope you die. +Soldiers were unarmed, they had no bullets, while Georgian thugs were armed with stones, clubs and metal rods. In fact what I am writing is partly based on the report of the Sobchak investigation team. +Oi! You! Stop vandalising bovine articles! Get a clue. Eat a chappati. +" As a native English speaker, I must say I don't find ""Triple Cross Square"" elegant at all, and I agree that it would likely mean ""potrójny krzyż"" rather than three crosses. But if it is really used in a significant number of reliable sources, then I suppose that's justification enough for mentioning it in the article. " +Mickie James is going to win Mickie James is going to beat Trish at Wrestlemania; Her Tornado DDT is vicious!! +" This is actually a quite controversial case, though I admit that the label Belgian is a little misleading, ""Trappist Quadrupel"" is not so bad. Stan Heironymous, in his very well researched book on Belgian Brewing ""Brew Like A Monk"", writes about La Trappe, which was briefly a trappist brewery in the Netherlands and had the appellation revoked when it sold to a Dutch Brewing company. According to those that sold, the problem was simply maintaining an order of monks. They did produce a beer which they called a Quadrupel. Moreover, Quadrupel has become a label on some american beers obviously of Belgian inspiration (and using derivatives of trappist yeast.) While this arguably makes Quadrupel not a style, Quadrupel is not listed as a style per say, but one of the myriad ""specialized"" belgian ales. I really find your argument unconvincing, since the style guidelines make it clear that this category is to be used for submitting to beer competitions with a beer that is not appropriately labeled as something else, which is to say that the style category is quite upfront about what it is and not misleading at all. Yes, the BJCP styles include some catch all categories that aren't rightly considered styles, but they are clear about it when a judging category doesn't not fit some historically entrenched approach to beer. Since the guidelines are very clear about what they are but also provide a lot of accurate information to the reader, I think they're great. (Indeed, I would appriciate it if those that object would show me where the BJCP contradicts the opinions of other groups on these subjects.)" +" Wht is your problem man? I'm trying to get to know you better and trying to talk and you are just shooting me down man and all that redneck stuff was my dumbass little brother and you havent even given me a chance to apologize for him im kinda disappionted cause i thought that wikipedia was supposed to help people...ive been through some real shit lately and the least you could do is not call my feelings a ""diatribe"" that hurt my feelings and pissed me off, im trying to understand but i dont so plz explain why you are being so goddam insensitive to me and my little brothers feelings?" +"__TOC__ {| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%""| Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! (talk) {| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! Getting Help |- |style=""color:#000""| New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions |- ! Getting along |- |style=""color:#000""| Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution |- ! Getting technical |- |style=""color:#000""| Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities [[Wikipedia +"Hey, could you please comment and watchlist the article for a few weeks. Cheers. — 2 " +(UTC) I recognise what you are saying, but unfortunately the word probe has propagated into many scientific publications about microarray analysis, therefore I suggest that the MIAME use of Reporters for known material and the alternate word probe should be used. Something like; Reporters (also refered to as probes)... 22:48, 19 September 2006 +The fact that you use the following techniques shows that you are not a critical thinker, but a conduit for state propaganda: Appeal to authority Appeal to fear Labeling Oversimplification Milieu control +". In short: there are three different Oviraptorids that look fairly similar: O. mongoliensis, O. philoceratops, Rinchenia mongoliensis (and additionally ""Citipati"", as you pointed out correctly). In this case it is an Oviraptor (mongoliensis)" +who are you? Who on earth are you to tell me what to do in spite of the fact I have already done it? Sod off. +ZOMG BLOCK! IT'S MORAN! +" Critical Reception for Night of Hunters I was browsing some Wiki entries and noticed the ""critical response"" section for Joanna Newsom's Have One On Me. It's twice as big as our section for Night of Hunters. I think we should leave all of the reviews we have accumulated where they are. We are still awaiting Rolling Ston'''s and Billboard'' magazine's reviews. Those will go up as well. Tell me what you think. I also posted this under the ""discussion"" tab. " +" The service does go to the slow speed for 24 hours now, not the 4 hours as before. The FAP can be viewed at: http://www.nationwidesatellite.com/HughesNet/service/HughesNet_fair_access_policy.asp The text of the page in the url above that states this is: ""The Fair Access Policy is straightforward. Based on an analysis of customer usage data, Hughes has established a download threshold for each of the HughesNet service plans that is well above the typical usage rates. Subscribers who exceed that threshold will experience reduced download speeds for approximately 24 hours."" Not only is the FAP section un-biased, in my mind it understates the problem. My vote is to keep it in as it is not advertised that you could have an average of 100Mb/day effective high speed rate in a worst case on a 200Mb/day plain once the 'punishment' is included in the calculation. (Yes, I am a biased hughes net user who was burned when it went from a limit per day to a limit per day + punishment without notice other than service below the level that was sold prior to the 24h limit and based on the still advertised 200MB/day (without the link to the FAP working unless you are a user on the following page: http://go.gethughesnet.com/HUGHES/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutInitial?Container=com.webridge.entity.Entity%5BOID%5BA88DE5C756665B4FA1951234C6C9B659%5D%5D" +Deleting content I am deleting unsourced or poorly/ improperly sourced content for various reasons described in my edit summaries. If anyone wants to contest my deletions, please make your case here. +NickHSpurs This is absolutely ridiculous, these automatic bots detect data from an unofficial source/blog, but don't allow me up load it using official references. Now you're sending me warnings saying you'll block me, ridiculous! +UPDATE, before I address this specifcally I'd like a consensus to form on Talk:Global_warming#Proposed_LEDE_paragraph_structure_.2F_outline +Higlett I have decided to move the page to Amber Sherlock as she is now using her married name of Sherlock. (Robbo128 ) +Cheers man. To be honest, I laughed my arse out in front of my laptop today. You guys are so funny attacking a beginner and that definitely made my day. Me and my girlfriend just can't stop laughing, seriously, hellish ghoul? ))))). Thanks for your advice I'll consider reading policies tomorrow. Now, the article is not complete, data must be obviously changed and content put in order and completed. However, I'll decide whether to go on or give up this wikipedia thing, since I like reality and palpable history, which is obviously not the case here. Wikipedia is more likely to fit (or create some) American history and culture. Thanks man and forgive my mistakes. They were on purpose. Best of luck to you guys. +I'm the bigot? you are a pathetic racist Afrocentrist who is intentionally lying about history to make up for the complete objective lack of black achievement in comparison to other races. No one else feels the need to lie and manipulate history like Afrocentrists. 69.158.28.97 +As of Dec 3, 2013, the article says 20 KB of RAM (both in the main article and the summary at the size) - later on it more correctly states 5 KB of ram, with only 3.5 kB accessible to basic programming. The 20 KB references should be replaced with 5KB. +Forbes Field photo I don't get it. Why can I not use a photo of Forbes Field on my personal page that is already on wikipedia? Are you saying only one person can use it? It seems you are going after me because you have a personal axe to grind for some reason. What's with it? +. Your sources are worthless +" African Americans are multiracials Countless studies and research have shown that African Americans aren't pure blacks, like you would find in Africa, but multiracials. They have Native American and Caucasoid in their ancestry, from being raped and what have you. Technically speaking, they are a completely separate race from ""Black people"", as they aren't pure blacks. The only reason they're often categorized as such is because of the One-Drop rule. Shouldn't this fact be noted in the heading of the article. At least something about them being multiracials as opposed to pure blacks? 66.175.204.183 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.175.200.14 That's because ""race"" varies over a fairly smooth space of variable phenotypes and two races are described as different when there is a discontinuity. That is to say, before civilized times, one was not really able to tell the difference between one's neighbors, and one was rather unlikely to encounter people who looked substantially different until more modern and effective means of transportation and higher population densities allowed for it. Your views on racial mixing ""creating a new race"" is bizarre, since it takes race to be an immutable and discrete classification system. This is the same kind of fallacy that leads one to ask for the ""missing link"" for evolution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.82.22 What do you mean by all that bombastic rigmarole?! I am stating a very simple truth, which is that African Americans are a mixed race because we have Caucasoid, Native American, and Negroid in us. People might wonder to themselves how can Tisha Campbell be black or Negroid when she doesn't look black by any stretch of the imagination. The answer is simple: because she's African American and skin colors range all across the board in the African American community. I have several people in my family who are the color of Tisha Campbell and that's because African Americans are NOT Negroids. We're multiracials. Research has been done proving this; not to mention, I have proof within my family tree. 66.175.201.77 " +" Retirement, for want of a better word. Hi all. I just thought I'd drop a line to mention that I will no longer be an overseer, and that my position will now be in the very, and far more, capable hands of Shreshth91, who has offered to become an overseer. Things have become quite busy of late, and I havn't really been that active here lately either, so I'm afraid I'll have to step down so to speak. I'd love to get involved at a later date, as a judge perhaps, or even a candidate. ) Cheers guys, it looks like this project has a great future. Thanks for everything! s " +" Lobojo wrote: ""I gave you links above to the rules on this which are clear."" I have not received any links from you but since you are unable to make any sense whatsoever, I feel using time on anything you have written would be kind of an insult to my lord and creator, i.e. a waste of time. " +"= New Reply to my fellow Mongols === Delioglu/Deliogul, there is not need to thank me for showing ""a new level of the art of personal attack"". Actually, we the Greeks and other Europeans have to thank you the Turks for ""teaching"" the mankind how to rape, plunder, pillage, depopulate, islamize and turkicize a big area populated by at least 15.000.000 Byzantine Greeks, Armenians, Kurds, Laz,Arabs etc. For this is what your ancestors, the Seljuks did when they arrived at Byzantine Asia Minor around 11th C.AD. You are schoolmasters of genocide and barbarity and Mustafa Kemal just added a ""modern"" facade to your murderous national character. You have given to humanity nothing else than horror, massacres, barbarity and ottoman backwardness. You will always be our enemies until Nemesis throws you back to Mongolia and Ulan Bator where you belong. ==" +REDIRECT Talk:Technicolour (rock band) +January 1989 You use the sandbox. +" Bummer. Yeah, I am using the ""Email this user"". I will resend it in a moment. - T:C " +EVERYONE READ THIS NOW! +I believe the top 100 officials or so are more than willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of their own. Tell me by the way - did the gassing of kurds in Iraq cause international military response? +Question If Barack Obama's certificate of live birth doesn't certify that he was born on US soil, than does that mean since I only have a certificate of live birth from Maine that I too am not an American? Does this mean every state that issues certificates of live birth does not in fact certify those receiving the certificate as genuine Americans? Should we also require every person to show their birth certificate before voting, and if it's only a certificate of live birth refuse them the ability to vote in the US? Should we refuse those with only certificates of live birth social security, medicare/medicaid, federal college loans, driver's licenses, et.al.? What say you? +Response from Tord on his departure from Eddsworld Following the death of Edd Gould, Tord uploaded a video to his YouTube channel talking about the Tord imposters online, personally explaining his reasons for leaving Eddsworld and debunking other rumours. I can't edit the article but it seems like the section on Tord would benefit from an edit to reflect the content of this video. +]] African American Atlantic Creole Creoles {{African diaspora +" :Image:Aslambeg.jpg Image deletion warning The image Image:Aslambeg.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. If you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, please provide the necessary information. (Μελ Ετητης) " +" These links pass WP:ELPOV. It states: ""Add comments to these links informing the reader of their point of view. If one point of view dominates informed opinion, that should be represented first."" So... The links representing the majority should be listed first. Anupam's links should follow. If anyone has a problem with Anupam's links then add ""comments informing the reader of their point of view"" as per policy. I don't see what the issue is. – Lionel (talk) " +Unneeded spelling changes The spelling repellant is an alternate and accepted spelling of repellent. There is no need to change it or insert the term to tell the reader that there is a mistake in the original. There is no mistake in using the alternate spelling. +" Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States FA-drive Sorry for spamming you, but in light of the impending shift of the Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States, I'd like to get this article up to FA status within the next few weeks, and ready for the front page by the time the Court starts its fall term. Any help or advice you can provide would be appreciated. Cheers! T " +FURTHERMORE.... I HAVE JUST VISITED RAGIB'S PAGE AND STUDIED THE DISCUSSION AREA. RAGIB IS OBVIOUSLY FROM BANGLADESH AND SEEMS TO BE A SIMILARLY PAROCHIAL CHAUVINIST EDITOR OF MANY OTHER ARTICLES, EVEN ASKING FOR UN-NECESSARY DELETIONS OF ARTICLES THAT HE DOES NOT LIKE..... AND GETTING SNUBBED FOR THE EFFORT!! +" Hi - I started editing in January of this year, but only became active in April. The Ste4k dispute took place in late July, and the AfD in late August rtinp23 " +" Destructuring of the article Ladies and gentlemen, apart from painful neutrality issue, I'm concerned with the growing deformation of the article's structure and style. I'm talking mainly about the actions of the definite national group of editors (which I could avoid naming unless it renews its usual personal attacking again). Two weeks ago I removed the duplicating and excessicely-detailed sentences, as well as irrelevant images from ""Ukraine"" section, and the other side seemed to agree non-images edit. Now I find new duplicating passages in the first section (although the intro looks better now). Editors who responsible for this: did you care reading section in the whole? And more, new lenghty redundant subsection on Vitebsk appeared. Not to mention the images, which litter only ""Ukraine"" section (is this a permanent trollish attack on Ukrainian editors?). Why doing things like that? I can understand POV-pushing intentions of pro-partisans users... But we must first of all care about innocent readers, not concerned with survival of either Russia or Ukraine. Otherwise the project would degrade, and Jimbo would run out of his budget. Distinctively on images issue: I will put NPOV tag unless they will be removed in a week. " +" GA Shannon. Hi, I noticed you posted that Shannon Rutherford's article is up for GA nomination. I have never worked on promoting an article to any type of ""status"", but I have joined the Lost article for many reasons, and one is to help promote the articles here on Wikipedia. If there's anything I can do to help you or anyone else, please let my know and I'll help immediately. Thank you. EØ Ŧ'''''' " +in other words, don't use the word a s s with the letters back-to-back because it sends up a red f u c k i n g flag to the computer reader. +Where did I attack him????? Where I only put back my homework, whats wrong with you dude? +"Revisiting neutrality on the Clinton entry== I edited some content about the Richard Mellon Scape adversarial relationship with Clinton that dogged his career for 8 years and even after he left office. Many of the controversies raised during Clinton's term were a DIRECT result of the Scape Arkansas Project and to see any reference to Richard Mellon Scape's part in Clinton's troubles just ""disappear"" seems like a very ""right-wing-view"" sanitization of the Wikipedia. As the, arguably, most important adversary of Clinton for a lengthy portion of Clinton's political career, to obliterate any mention of this relationship comes close to censorship. R.M. Scape is one of two very large and looming forces at work in American politics in the early 21st century, the other being George Soros on the left. Their fingerprints, from behind the curtain, certainly draw analogies to the Wizard(s) of Oz. Please note that I did not vote for Clinton either time, being somewhat more conservative, but I have noticed an apparent right shifted bias developing in areas that touch upon politically related items in the Wikipedia lately - and ""it ain't good"" as they say. This slow erosion of complete disclosure concerning what is stylized as ""right wing leaning"" viewpoints and the retention of those things which critisize ""left wing leaning"" viewpoints is subtle but steady - not just here, but across many places on the Wikipedia. While they make me smile sometimes, my inclination toward keeping Wikipedia neutral reins in my mirth. I would encourage the group to rethink the neutrality of Wikipedia & work very hard to balance the influences on both sides to prevent any more of this ""shading"" of the Wikipedia. I know it is very hard to remain absolutely objective but it is imperative that we do so in order to remain a respected source. To remain COMPLETELY factual without opinionated bias, it seems to me Wikipedia should error on the side of INclusion rather than EXclusion. IdioT.SavanT.i4 06:51 CDST 11 August 2006 ==" +2003 (UTC) done 20:41, 7 Sep +9th month of 2009 You are crazy, spending all your time here on wikipedia and think you own the site. The site belongs to all of us. Let other people do some editing. You don't know very much little guy! 206.170.111.187 +" Um, huh? My alternate account is for use when I'm not at home - because at home is the only secure place where I trust being logged into that admin account. When I am at work, or elsewhere, I log into my alternate account. I've already been accused of choosing to not participate in the case, are you therefore suggesting that I refrain from participating until I'm back at home? That seems counterproductive and counterintuitive, now that I'm actually available with Wikipedia actually being accessible to me! the panda ɛˢˡ” " +RACIST now you know who you are and where you belong. I'm not gonna bather myself with hopeless people +Bite Me, Redux Really. Stop leaving silly messages for people if you don't want them to talk back to you. +Yeah, this guy seems to be editing a number of pages with the same sort of 'Disney will make a film out of it' speculation. I see these same edits from 90.215.95.79, 94.11.59.187, 90.221.161.71, 94.4.151.186 - all registered to BskyB Broadband in the UK. Looks like a persistent sock-puppetteer, and may require admin intervention. +This is because the first thing he did after I asked him to apologize was to block my account. +WHO YA CALLIN' A TWIT? +So now you are assuming insult by the term Irish Republican? +Langdon Farms Golf Club 1995 Anthony, We use to work together at Langdon Farms in Player Services. I wanted to congratulate on winning the Malayasian Open last month. Best of luck on the tour for years to come..Marty Harrison Player Services manager 1995 +"Finally, while your opinion may be that Romney is a superior candidate, you simply cannot say from a factual standpoint that he is currently ""winning"" against the President. Realclearpolitic's current average shows Obama currently leading by 4 points, averaged from each of the polls. The President also holds a sizable advantage in swing states, although Ryan may tilt Wisconsin more towards Romney. So while you and I may disagree over what the outcome of the race is, you cannot say that as of right now, Romney is in a position to win, at least in the context of this article. " +Notification of proposal to ban Spanish articles Dear WikiProject Spain member, There is currently a proposal to ban articles concerning a large area of southern Andalusia from appearing on the Main Page of Wikipedia in the Did you know? section. This would affect a significant number of articles within the scope of WikiProject Spain. If you have a view on this proposal, please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs‎#Proposal for one-year moratorium on Gibraltarpedia DYKs. +" I sent my best man to ""have a talk"" with him he has a lovely way of putting things in order.The WelshBuzzard''" +" Found my error, it appears I saved the thumb image on the queue page, rather than the commons page. As it was the the exact image representation, it did not appear different when I looked at the final product. No excuse. Not like learning to ride a bike, huh. Time to get back to reading up on the vast discussion board archive over the last several months. Again thank you. Waters " +I am going to break my own personal policy of not commenting to unsigned comments: if you want me to respond to a comment, sign it. Nlu (talk) Your message makes no sense, and your personal policy is immaterial to your role and responsibilities as an Administor. What do you care who the comment is from? Dont hide behind your silly personal policy. +" Board: ""Celebrity Deathmatch"" (1998)" +Why do you expect everything to be referenced? Jesus... +Not sure what your gripe is. Hydrcracking uses more energy than it generates as well. Are you suggesting people shouldn't know about electrolysis because it obeys the law of conservation of energy? Oh, and you don't burn the sea water... you burn the gas that comes off the sea water after a current has been applied. Many of the methods of generating H2 mentioned in the article are less efficient than electrolysis or are even purely theoretical. (engineering cyanobaccilus to make hydrogen etc.) +" Palestine Why isnt the palestinian national authority on here? They have a Parliamentary system. It may be a bit corrupted but it is still a legitimate system. At first I thought it was because it was not ""an official UN country"". However, I notice Kurdistan Region is on there. And that is FARRRR from a country. Anyway just a thought. I can add it but i am not a huge contributor so wanted to make sure there was no real reason as to why. [User:jnusaira]" +By the way, what Will Beback said, even if true, has nothing to do with what I said on my personal blog outside of Wikipedia. Further, I do not promote my view here, as he said, except within the confines of WP:COI, with which I comply. If Will Beback has a concern about me, he should raise them on AN/I, instead of typing them into Talk pages where I edit. +" FUTON indeed. I deprodded it because the cited city document spells out a series of reasons to consider the street notable. Confirming additional sources for those may take time and digging, but such sources seem quite likely to exist. I note that a couple of Portland history websites provide promising avenues for research, for anyone able to take up the task. If the quotes at Cafeunknown.com are accurate, the local papers made a succinct case for the notability of the 1925 lighting: ""From the standpoint of illumination per square foot, the Broadway association announces, Broadway will be the best lighted street in the world."" (Sunday Oregonian, November 22, 1925.) ""Gay with iridescent brilliance of the Milky Way, the main boulevard of the City of Roses will burst Tuesday evening into a dazzling orgy of electric rays that will rival the most famous glittering thoroughfares in the world."" (The Portland News, November 24, 1925.) And PDXHistory.com has an excellent page about Broadway, which perhaps ought to be listed as an external link here. " +" DYK for Jamaican general election, 1997 On July 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jamaican general election, 1997, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page () and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " +" Pessimism v. optimism in Beckett. I have an issue with the statment ""Beckett's work is . . . deeply pessimistic about the human condition"" as found in the first paragraph. I changed ""deeply"" to ""deceptively,"" and it was immediately changed back. I don't know how to contact the subsequent editor directly, so I'll post this here by way of discussion. Perhaps replacing “deeply” with “deceptively” is not the best fix, but as it stands the quoted statement puts forth, as fact, an opinion that is widley open to interpretation. Beckett’s writings aren’t just about the journey. If they were, “deeply pessimistic” would be nearly undebatable. They’re just as much about the destination, or at least the goal. And while he frames life’s journey as a slog through shit, his ultimate implication is that the slog is worthwhile. As everything from the Greek and Latin classics to the greatest of Hollywood’s pro-war propaganda movies have proven again and again, the more monstrously you portray the obstacle, the larger looms the hero who overcomes them. The same is true in Beckett: the obstacles are unrelenting and nearly insurmountable, but the journey continues, heroically. The Beckett hero may be standing in the dark, but he's faced towards the light, distant—an unattainable—as it may be. The essential Beckett quote isn’t “I can’t go on”—full stop; it’s “I can’t go on. I’ll go on.” Now, I may not have convinced you, personally, that Beckett’s work is more optimistic than pessimistic. But perhaps I’ve made a case that a flatly factual statement like “Beckett's work is stark . . . and deeply pessimistic about the human condition” is a bit overstated for an article that strives to remain free of bias. Beckett himself would be the first to disagree with you. He once said that if he were a pessimist, he wouldn’t write. Although I know that the artist is not always the most reliable source for understanding his work, that ought to count for something." +|listas=Heart Is a Lonely Hunter +gueeeeesssssss whoooooooo ! D:D:D +Thanks for the much-needed support!!! I started to feel like some male edition of the Amazing Ann Coulter. I am at war here, truly. Thanks for the support. I am fully bunkered down, but no admin. to the rescue, in spite of what you yourself noted, that LGagnon has been just as foul to the admins!!!!!! What gives???!!! AOluwatoyin +I stronly disagree with you, i am simply replying to what he said, if i said something wrong, delete that,not everything, i deeply and 100% reject your reply, I also put back all other conversation other leave, because in the meantime you revert and others leave it, you have no manners and ethics at all.Now, your reply will not be tolerated. +" Markstreet and Mauco Was there ever a ip check on these users? This reply of Street is surprisingly simmilar to how Mauco reverted and argued that the version to which he reverted to is the one ""agreed on"". Also, I find certain talk patterns in Street, which I also noticed in Mauco... It`s clear (at least for me) that Mauco works for ICDISS, and considering that Street works for TiraspolTimes (itself a ICDISS site), than I think all chances are Street and Mauco are the same person... What do you think? " +PS: in WP it is mentioned here: Idaho_National_Laboratory#Fatal_accident +You need to be more careful about your manners on the internet. I suspect you have some sort of close relationship with Cook and I will continue to watch your activities carefully. Consider yourself warned. ::: +..Thanks for your inputs. Please leave the sources as I created this page for a grade this semester. Thank you. +" Oppose, prefer merge to Novorossiya – See my comment in the current AfD. — ☎ " +I was going to put this on Bbb23's Talk page but since Akron has contributed here, what are the basis for these warnings concerning the Men's rights movement? I don't get it. People contributing to the discussion there are supposed to get warnings on what basis? Making well reasoned points about the article? +"because it just seems like a page that needs cleanup now, not a test page. 888 " +" Commons Admin Noticeboard beginning 3/22 Part II Three-revert rule and David Shankbone Hey Herby, does the Three-revert rule from WP apply here at Commons? I see that editor David Shankbone has reverted a comment, on WJBscribe's talkpage, three times in less than twenty-four hours: , , . Should this incident be reported at COM:AN, COM:AN/A, or COM:AN/V? Please advise. Thank you, Honey...oops, I mean, Herby. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) at 11:24, 22 Mar 2008 (UTC) Stop the trolling or I will block you (& 3 RR does not apply on Commons nor would it ever to such edits) talk thyme Pity. I thought I'd ask you, Hon, since you have experience here and at WP, where you're an ""Admin open to recall."" What about the actions of WJBscribe in this matter? Should I report his presiding over COI and BLP violations at Michael Lucas (director) to any or all of the forums listed above, or others, or both? BTW, is the term ""trolling"" Wikispeak for ""followup?"" Blocked for two hours. /talk to me/ Blocked?? Yeah, right. ABF, I want Herby's reply go block something else. How to block this IP without blocking all of north New Jersey Herby and ABF: Wikipedia found a way to block this IP range without blocking the entire range. If you look at this thread on ANI, the message by Wknight tells you the range to block to at least make it more of a pain for the person to have to continually reset their modem until they find an open protocol. I suggest we do that for about a month here. Whizkids Herby and ABF: apparently that does not work as I'm here, and I have been there, too. David: if only you could stay off ""substances"" for about a month (how long has it been since you've been without for a month, since you started?), and undergo psychiatric help in the same period, to start. David C. Miller, you have been ""found out."" I know who you are and I know what you've done and you're not getting away with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) at 14:06, 22 Mar 2008 (UTC) In general trolls are to be ignored as far as I am concerned. I have a life - you may wish to get one yourself I guess. In passing you are of course welcome to report anyone you like anywhere you wish to, might be amusing I suppose talk thyme Herby, it's troubling that you find amusement in somebody wanting to report possible Admin vio's of BLP and COI. My involvement on Wikipedia is very limited. Take issues you have there to whatever page you want there. You probably know your way around better than me talk thyme You're right, I probably do, given that I have successfully edited despite amateurish ""blocks"" while you have unsuccessfully evaded recall there. That's why you're here, right? No matter. Luck you. Hey Herby - it did work on WP - but if it doesn't, that IP range may not be as active on Commons as it is on WP, and so you may just want to block the whole range. Wikinews is prepared to do so, as well. Obviously, WP has other considerations. The IP editor has become a running joke in the IRC c +Wrong, Stefan. City seal is being used within the correct context/means. Stand down. - +I originally put it in because of the Evangelical Christian nature of the film and the specific mention of Evangelical Christianity in the quote. Some readers may be under the mistaken impression that he is Christian (he is actually Jewish) and taking a mostly negative view of the movie because of that mistaken impression. It also tends to give his review credibility because it conveys a reasonable aspect of impartiality on Medved's part. +" You probably shouldn't be including songs ""in protest"". Edits ought to be made in order to benefit the article, not to express dismay at its current state. " +Your problem is that you remove my criticism which are not personl attacks You need to actually read my messages, of which about 5 of them you removed from the record and I'm keeping yours off until you bring mine back. +" That wasn't an appeal, of course. But I'm dissappointed Cailil. This reply was the sort of lazy, hackneyed tripe I would expect from the average joe that that hangs out at ANI, or from the sort of petty pointless admin who runs around dolling out the stock phrases like this and blocking socks without even bothering to look at the edits they make, the sort of admin where you can be sure that for 90% of their daily activites, thinking about whether they're even benefitting Wikipedia or not doesn't even enter their thought process. You just thanked Black Kite for the ""heads up"", which you would never have even got if it wasn't for me, the evil rule breaker. What's up with that? Can you deal with that Cailil? Can you deal with the idea that someone like me can in your eyes be 'breaking a rule' on Wikipedia (which, I might add, you still haven't even proven), while also apparently benefitting it by shining a light on the continuing bad behaviour of HighKing. You can't in all seriousness expect to come here and expect me to listen to this sort of crap, when you've discredited it with your own actions elsewhere. I saw Jimbo talking recently about how he vehemently disagreed with someone's claim that Wikipedia was very bad at dealing with whistleblowers. What say you? Or is it all just rhetoric to you? You could unblock me yourself if you really wanted, nobody forced you to make this block. Not even Black Kite thought it was necessary, which is saying something, as he hands out blocks like confetti. I don't have any issue with promising you that the next time I want to make a complaint about HighKing, I'll use this account, if it satisfies your need to be able to track my history, if it satisfied your need to enfore a rule, even though doing so is entirely pointless in this case. But it's almost like you want people like me to sock, it's almost like you want me to break the rules, it's almost like you think it helps to have HighKing running around blaming all his woes on socks, when you know it's just one of many ways he tries to deflect attention from his own edits. What is the official story now, btw? He seems to have caught on to the fact that there is more than one person who is critical of him, yet you seem to be taking the retrograde step of going back to his old theory that we're all the same person. Can you really not see how your approach only exacerbates the issue? That it only makes eventual resolution less likely, or at least add another couple of years onto the final reckoning of just how well Wikipedia was able to deal with the sort of behaviour HighKing is by now the textbook example of. Or have you just been working around Sandstein for far too long, and you've completely lost your higher brain functions and can now only operate literally to the rule book as he does, the freak that he is. Maybe if you were truly honest about the fact that who we are doesn't make a blind bit of difference to whether or not you are doing what you should be with regard to HighKing, you wouldn't find yourself having to make these sort of replies, which must surely make you feel just that little bit shameful. You cannot really be happy that you feel have to say things like this to people like me, things that are so obviously intelectually dishonest that if it wasn't already the case, you just know we're not going to take a blind bit of notice of them? Because like it or lump it, whether you treat me as the enemy or as a whistle blower, I'm not going away, not until the HighKing situation is resolved one way or the other. And neither is anyone else by the looks of it. I don't even care if the resolution is that he becomes a good editor. That's how foolish it is for you to continue on this track. I'm not harassing HighKing in any way, shape or form, and you have still yet to establish whether I am an illegitimate sock or not. This is why you avoid the central issues like that when answering for blocks like this, instead preferring the sort of non-reply reply given above. It's just poor, Cailil, very poor. " +" The only thing I want to say to that is that not all Mexicans want the sentence to stay... it's a bit unfair to put us all in the same ""bloc"", if you want to call it that. xd(?!?) " +" i see your insult towards me was accepted and no action taken by the rotten wikipedia admins: ""I'll take that one. ""Blah blah blah yammer yammer yammer propagandists blah blah blah yammer yammer yammer bullshit."" Poor little, tiny conspiracy theorist. Mommy doesn't love him enough to give him attention. Feel free to ""silence"" (conspiracy theorist talk for ""rightly make fun of"") this latchkey kid as needed. 68.0.236.131 (talk) "" surprised? not! moon hoax admin has their propaganda to defend and they dont care when a mortal user gets insulted. F U C K YOU WIKIPEDIA ADMINS" +Students can give a colloquium, it does not mean it has the blessing of CERN. Might be fun to watch the webcast, though - maybe the speaker will be chopped to mincemeat. / +(Response to this edit 'announcement) +" Sorry. I was having a bad day. You can find more on Adambier here: ""Jahrbuch der Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin, 1911"", page 522 ""American Handy Book of the Brewing, Malting and Auxiliary Trades"", Wahl & Henius, 1902, page 829 ""Zeitschrift für das gesammte Brauwesen 1890""" +There is nothing a priori that prevents an admin from watching a contentious article that is already under enforcement and stepping in when needed. I probably did this a few times myself. You can have situations where the participants don't realize how toxic behavior is to others who might want to contribute (or indeed, they might enjoy the toxic environment). That said, if there is a concern that an admin is being too heavy-handed, it seems like the place to bring it up first is WP:AE so it can be reviewed by other admins who have experience in enforcement matters. Thatcher +" welcome Hello ! Welcome to English Wikipedia Thanks you for your participation in this project. We hope that you will stay and contribute, and that you will find the experience enjoyable. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, it is free for all to use and anyone may edit it. There are certain guidelines and principles that all users are expected to follow. These principles and guidelines are listed below—click on a link for more information. The five pillars of WikipediaThe fundamental principles of the project HelpWikipedia's help section TutorialThis tutorial is a basic guide to editing Your user pages and your sandboxHow to experiment and edit in your user space Mentoring programAsk an experienced editor to be your mentor How to start a pageHelp on creating your first article Things to avoidHow to avoid common errors and mistakes Style GuideHow to write in an acceptable style Main policies of Wikipedia An introduction to Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines Frequently asked questionsSome common questions and their answers Help DeskHere you can ask other editors for assistance Quick referenceA handy quick reference guide for editing WikiThis page is your Talk page. Here you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you should put your signature, by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing the button in the editor bar—shown here in the picture. Do not sign in the articles themselves. See When signatures should and should not be used for more information. Can't see this message properly? Click here for a simpler version. [[User:Sphilbrick| +" WP:WEIGHT has destroyed Wikipedia's credibility for presenting the full picture. I have seen it time and time again. It is mainly used to suppress dissenting views from Government and MSM sources (which are both bought and payed for by a minority of the 1% super rich) .The authentic way would have been to allow the minority view to be expressed and presented fully, then simply explain why they are wrong point by point (if there is really a case. let's find out !). and to mention where the professional ""consensus"" stands this moment. but Wikipedia avoids that methodology and it makes it highly suspect of its motives. I am not a supporter of RT but i am very happy that they broadcast everything the ""usual networks"" avoid and suppress at all cost." +Template:Infobox very fit for this section. My be… As min 3 pic is normal, although 5 pic is normal too. I think this interview need. Why? It is not necessary. It's right. Meaning section explained base principes of construction of video. “Awards” in music video section and “Awards” in article is not the same thing. “Awards” in article is ALL awards for “Umbrella”. “Awards” in section is awards ONLY for music video. +": Orange, Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments. I've read that Wikipedia is interested in the product, not the process. ZZM is obsessed with the process, and presents endless hurdles to improving the product. He constantly quotes Wikipeida policies to me. If I want to make a change, I am violating WP:XXXX, he tells me every time. I understand there is a Wikipedia policy that says ""ignore all rules"" WP:IAR and another that says, don't be a WP:DICK. Of course, the one thing ZZM clains over and over is that his right to do whatever he wants, and for me this behavior is very disruptive, is justified by WP:OWN, that I don't own it. He's can't hold off for a few hours when I ask him, so that I can finish something. Doesn't this violate WP:DICK? But seriously, WP:OWN is just an excuse for endless circular edit wars, because the answer to I don't own it is that he also doesn't own it. But that brings up one more thing. You really need to chill out however, because I am afraid either you will be blocked from editing certain articles (along with ZZM, I would hope) or you will get frustrated and refuse to participate (not very mature if you did that). You say, ""not very mature if you did that""? Pardon me, but one thing that I do own is my own life, my own time, and my own abilities. Right now, the article Judaism and evolution is a polished and sourced article from the heading ""Jewish opposition to Darwinian evolution"" on down. Above that heading, the article is a mess of unsourced quotations, mostly. Those quotations are generally correct, and do give a good sense of what mainstream Jewish opinion is on evolution. But turning what is there now (and all the other material that is available) into a real article is going to be a lot of work. Of course, somebody else could do that work, and somebody else will eventually come along who wants to. But am I ""not mature"" if I don't want to? No, my life is my life! Based on my experience with ZayZayEM, who has followed me from one article into several others already, I don't want to work on it. I've got to have a life, celebrate Pesach, visit my aging parents, and more. I'm willing to work on this material if I don't have to deal with ZayZayEM. I welcome the participation of people like you, Shira, Jay, jmabel, IZAK, and others who follow reasonable editing patterns, use Talk pages, and so forth. I've tried to talk several of my friends into becoming Wikipedia editors. They are people who could make huge contributions. I know that if any of them ran into ZayZayEM, that would be the end of their contribution to Wikipedia. Do you understand my contention that following a person from one article into another and yet another, is a form of stalking, and that it makes me extremely uncomfortable, even if the fellow is halfway around the world? That's why I asked to have my User page sanitized last week. (All old entries to it were erased.) I used to have personal information about my family on that page. " +Oh, I am sorry, I was looking at a previous edit. My apologies! I am terribly, terribly sorry, and very embarassed. I hope to make amends with you. +" Lists of subclans Well, I do not question the intentions of the contributer who added these lists, however, I do question the importance of their presence which is rather annoying in an article which is not a list. If others agree, I would like to move this list to a new page titled ""List of subclans of Gujjars"" or if you have a better title, please let others know on this page. " +" That image is neither a shock image nor an explicit one. I don't see how placing a photo of a British soldier in an article about the British Army is ""disruptive"". " +Overeager reformists... Dear KylieTastic, I respectfully suggest that you take advantage of the several excellent free Italian dictionaries available on the web, should you still have doubts on the correction of my edit. Cheers +It seems to me that the various parties are making progress on reaching some compromise version. Can you just join their thread and ask about your proposal? I would prefer to have a clear cut mandate from all the editors letting me know what they agreed on. Also, if there is total agreement now among the regular editors to collaborate constructively, I'll be glad to unprotect the page. +sure mister sick-n-tie,lol i will drop it goodbye. User:Big foot123456789 +Hi Merilinus - I fixed your page history. Let me know if it's back to the way you would like it to be. +Sorry to bother you, it looks like I found out how to do it. The map will be complete in a day or two, and I will show you it. Izvini za smetnju, pronaso sam kako da ovo uradim. Mapa ce biti zavrsena za neki dan, pa cu da ti pokazem. ( ). +How am I not blocked by now? There were serval vandalism investigations, sock puppeting investigations, and arsen investigations is my name cleared on The list of: 'Potential Sock Puppets' cause I know I'm on that list. Can you suck my dick? +a memory location. Jumping into data caused an exception +ITN Credit  -  (here I am) +"When you say, ""Some states also exempt holders of out-of-state permits which they recognize in accordance with reciprocity agreements."" " +Raul654 has just reinserted a much gentler warning. I'm happy with that one. (Tart, knees hot) 23:38, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) +Dude. Shut the fuck up. +Nevhood|Nevhood]] 06:27, 21 February 2007 +" The information is incomplete and the issue to complex to be simply summed with such a biased quote. Piotrowski and Davies (whom he cites) have much more to say on that - see here - and certainly they would be appalled at an attempt to sum a complex issue with just one sentence. Why want you quote instead just Stachura who writes about ""Jewish opposition to Polish independence""? Why not qualify it with Levy, who notes that ""Jews were the victims of thousands of pogroms, dozens of them in Poland""? Why not use Davies explanation that it was the normal wartime conditions (Polish-Ukrainian War, Polish-Soviet War) and not any targeted antisemitism that led to vast majority of Jewish deaths? Why not quote the contemporary observer, Sir Horace Rumbold, 9th Baronet, who wrote (cited by Davies) that ""the condition [of the Jews] in Poland, bad as it may have been or may still be, has been far better than in most of the surrounding countries""? The sentence, as it is currently, shows a biased POV, and needs to be rewritten to be neutral. To say that Polish independence was accompanied by wave of pogroms is as accurate as to say that Soviet liberation of Europe in 1945 was accompanied by waves of spontaneous greetings.| talk " +GAY. GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY! +Attempt at editing my OWN talk page Am I allowed to edit my own talk page or will people have a period over that as well? +I've given up on resolving disputes with those people. Frankly, resolution is not possible. All you have to do is look into his contributions to see an obvious pattern of vandalism. It does not take an expert on the subject to figure out what's going on there. What you don't seem unable or unwilling to understand is why those users are editing articles on Wikipedia in the first place. There are two possibilities... i) You don't have a history with these guys. or ii) You are involved in the same activities. You have made it quite clear where you stand though. You are as guilty as they are of corrupting the integrity of those articles, whether it is intentional or not. Have a good day. +Its sooooooooooooo funny you got blocked! you think your god around here! +" Things to throw the public off have been included in marketing campaigns before, but I haven't seen them included here on Wikipedia. For example, part of the original Banshee's logo was revived in the early days of GateKeeper's campaign but there is no mention there (also ""scream like a banshee"" makes no mention).   Talk  " +It appears your photo has appeared there. But anyway, that's facebook's thing. They haven't worked any kind of deal out with us. Our content is fairly easy, and free, to mirror. +Lisa Randall is a Jewish woman from Queens whose father changed his last name to help him navigate the world of employment without a Jewish tag after attending the Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey. Source: http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/lisa-randall-is-a-fools-genius/ Picture of her nose: http://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/other/events/randall06/images/friend_randall.jpg +Also please dont blindly rvert content as you undid grammatical stuff unrelated to content. +"*""... Akbar (ăk'bär) [key], 1542–1605, Mughal emperor of India (1556–1605); son of Humayun, grandson of Babur. ... Although he was himself illiterate, Akbar's courts at Delhi, Agra, and Fatehpur Sikri were centers of the arts, letters, and learning. He was much impressed with Persian culture, and because of him the later Mughal empire bore an indelible Persian stamp. ..."" " +Guess I got you just in time then itchy +" I take it you did read this. Great block, Ryan. andemu " +It seems he even sent letters to the Pope. +Suggest you enhance the current stub! +go cum on a dildo wankbag +its MY TALK PAGE . HELLO CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT. I AM SHELBY YOUNG AND I WANT MY NAME OFF THIS WEBSITE AND PER JIM WALES I CAN REMOVE BOTH THE IP ADDRESS AND MY TALK PAGE SO GTFO. +There is no such requirement; if you cannot find an asnwer to your questions in teh preceding iscussion, then ask the user who disupted the neutarlity in the first place. +Have you attempted other methods of dispute resolution ? +" Thank you. But administrators must also follow the policies. Now, Gwen changed or deleted too many of my editspure and simple. I mean, where does she get off saying the police surmised Peg died on Sept 18? What's her source? She have the police report? I do! The police surmised no such thing! The death certificatenot my original researchsays ""Date of Suicide September 16,"" as does the police report, Coroners Report, and Inquest. The date of death given as September 18, 1932, is because that was when she was DECLARED DEAD by the coroner. If the coroner had not examined the body for another hour and eleven minutes, Peg's death date would have been recorded as September 19, for he would have declared her dead at 12:01 AM, yet the date of suicide would remain September 16, for the coroner knew the rate of decay. That was the way it was done in 1930s Los Angeles....The coroner knew what he was doingGwen didn't. I have official documents provided to me by the City of Los Angeles, yet Gwen would rather what? Use a newspaper as a more verifiable source than these, or just pick one section of the death certificate without reading the entire document? Has she even read it? All of it? Why am I even having this discussion? As it stands now, the article contains a good deal of ambiguity, whereas before it had very little. And once again, I raise the concern that the article was argued over, discussed, and a concensus agreed to by numerous long-time editors such as Rossrs and Wildhartlivie, and, if I remember, Pinkadelic. At any rate, the article stood on its legs for many months before Gwen brought the hatchet. I care about Wikipedia, too, and I am concerned about unverifiable entries making their way into any article. I fully remember when Wiki was the laughing stock of the Internet and scholarship in general. Did you see how many pages Gwen used up in the ""View History"" and then had the nerve, the gall, to tell me she ""tweaked"" it? She didn't tweak it, she rewrote the damn thing. And would it not have been a polite courtesy to first talk over all the edits? This, more than anything, is why there are so many ill feelings between contributors on Wiki. Too many are simply too head strong to think, ""Wait a sec, so and so has obviously done a lot of work here, maybe I should talk some things over with him to reach a concensus and make a better article."" That's what a professional editor would dothat's what my book editor does with me...and isn't that what Britannica and all other encyclopedia editors do? " +Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 Education: UC Berkeley/Stanford University Joint Program CSCE 203.218.157.16 +" I will gladly participate in an open forum or conference call on this page. What CIA does not realize, and what most of you are probably also unaware of, is that a select private sector group is busy creating the World Brain that will bury both CIA and Googleand will be ""open"" in every positive sense of the word. I could easily have funded a 100 people to put in one item each on this page, but I did not. I do NOT see the sense of censoring me because I happen to have spent 20 years nurturing thousands of othersunlike anyone else at CIA or in relation to this page. Let me know. My direct email is bear@oss.net Carlton, thank you for NOT deleting my seven contributed links this time around, I would really like to see others (and yourself, since you evidently have no idea what each link leads to) comment on the utility of those links to the page. Best wishes to all, Robert " +" Anyway, sounding ""right"" or ok is the same as being right; its E major." +List of Premiers of the Soviet Union I appeal on you to stop with your disruptive reverting on this article. I worked very hard yesterday in order to improve it, and I won't back down on this issue. Your version is just poorer than mine. As for numbering, if you read article you'll see this part: There have been thirteen premiers. So, why I can't add the numbers? Please, stop all of this if you want to avoid edit war and breaching of 3RR. +OK, not for now then. This is headed to some form of mediation, I suspect. +" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dwrayosrfour for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " +" [edit]] FT2 you say ""Headley is basically tricky to spot, but often unmistakable when experienced. "" That's because he is deeply opposed to the views you hold on NLP and Zoophilia. Oh yeah. " +" And lest I forget, Alan White, one of the super super members of this super super group, is no longer involved with the project. So even if we were to take the opinion of one magazine writer as gospel, it would be misleading to refer to the current line-up of this band as ""a kind of supergroup"". " +Thank you for showing me the proper usage. I will keep that in mind next time I edit. +" Hold on, I'm misreading you. ""I had proposed 2RR for him"" - I assumed that applied to the current episode. As far as I can tell, you're proposing no sanction at all " +User page You do not deserve this. Removal of an AfD tag is a crime punishable by speedy deletion of the article in question. However, I have been kind and made Pinafore Pirates your user page as someone suggested in the AfD discussion. +" You really like editing my edits. Go to the New Jersey Devils' website, and look at the roster, then check out how many points Cam Janssen had this year. Last time I checked it said 41 games, 1 point. Stop editing things just because you THINK they're wrong, when they're really right. " +Wikilawyering If the article really was drafted for my benefit, it would be flattering more than anyting else. Cheers. +User Rlandmann does not appear to like any reference on the internet - why don't we all give up and leave wikipedia to him - he does not seem to like anyone elses input. Quite honestly, I am getting sick and tired of this nitpicking and other crap people like him keep throwing in the paths of people trying to serious articles on wiki. No wonder so many people just give up and leave. pretty soom it will just be Rlandmann 24/7 +. A lot of people are using this page to help the people of Myanmar. This can only be a good thing and is more important than maintaining a presentable page += SUGGESTION FOR EDIT Milborneone put a tabled guide to the units stationed at Rudloe Manor. However even through all of the P&SS; deebate of should it stay or should it go, I notice that P&SS; is not listed in the table of units attached to Rudloe Manor - and dates. An oversight. Does someone wish to insert this information. +" This is the BS I am talking about. You have lied about me and other editors. The Murray information was to support ""200 fewer bombers"". If you look at Bzuk's talk page you will see I provided him the Murray citation via google books, so that is false as well. And the same for Irving. You didn't bother to trace his citation to the sources section did you? Tut, tut. It reveals the figures for production came from Milch's notes. If you had also bothered to read the next page (p. 164 I believe) Irving demonstrates perfectly clearly what Milch felt about production levels. This is part of the reason why you were blocked from editing on the Battle of Britain page, and then again for socket puppeting. I am not refusing to give anything. In fact I can give you the quote for the ""77"". Only I think I'll do it tomorrow night, given I am tired and you having wasted most my time today. You should have simply asked for it in the begining, like a normal person, instead of moving everything around and removing my citations. As for the change in ""Romanian"" to ""Reich"", yes it is difficult to work out what Caldwell is referring to. It seems this particular mission was a diversion to the synthetic oil plants in W.Germany (not Polesti). RAF Bomber Command used an attack by the 8AF to attack this target. In fact, no, I can't resist. ""Two Gruppen of JG 27 were sent up after the RAF Lancasters, but could not get past the swarms of RAF Spitfires and Mustangs. For the day the RLV force lost 44 KIA, 16 WIA, and 77 fighters. The RAF lost no bombers, and one Spitfire"" So there you have it. So now I would like you to recipricate. " +" Harland Hand Memorial Garden A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Harland Hand Memorial Garden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . — (talk to me!) " +Peking Duck is a chinese- style food dish. 98.25.30.188 +Isn't the second introductory paragraph a little bit over the top? I respect this person as one of the best cricketers of his time, but the writing does not really strike me as something I would expect from an encyclopedia. Kinetek +" Re: South of Heaven I certainly remember you - I have a good knack for remembering names on Wikipedia. As concerns you leaving feedback being ""not so good news"", that's incorrect. If you hadn't left feedback, that would've been not so good news. Feedback is great since it tightens an article, and I want to thank you for leaving some. Thanks for deeming the article to be GA. If there's an article you want me to look at in order to leave constructive feedback for, feel free to message me. " +Simon Rex Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. +Welcome! Hello, 136.186.67.150, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! +July 2013 (UTC) Three weeks have passed and the change is still not made. Why not? 201.215.187.159 06:16, 24 +" eMac Thanks for the note, should be all updated now.   Esc " +" Speedy deletion of Sparky jones A tag has been placed on Sparky jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (talk) " +What shit u talk to me, communist rat? +" A barnstar for you! The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Professing my love. For... umm... your work... Nice save... right? " +OPEN THE OLD PAGE AGAIN My name is Irene Tandry. I don't care about your contribution, but I hate speedy deletion you do it without my agreement. Can you open See Me (novel) so that I describe that page in my own language? +=== I heard the reserve goalkeepr had died on the BBC Radio 1 News. But the BBC website doesnt back this up yet. 4 deaths was the number I heard most recently. +":::Eek, I meant to use that point just to prove you're wrong that ""the Flemish"" is not an unused term. Common usage would need to add usage of ""the Flemish"" to other adjectival uses referring to the people that all use the term ""Flemish"". (let's chat) " +Thanks for the advice, I will avoid any contact with the subject for the time being and read your links for a better understanding of the system and await response from Admin. cheers +" After about the 8th revert, no explanation to the reliability of the source has been given. Please show how the source is reliable instead of claiming it is when it is not. " +"Check out my brilliant profile in roblox -Stealty5" +" It has been suggested that History of writing ancient numbers be merged into History of writing numbers. That is backwards. I created History of writing ancient numbers from History of writing numbers because ""History of writing numbers"" was too broad a title and overlapped the subject matter of ""History of numerals"" and ""Numeral system]]. Leave ""History of writing ancient numbers"" alone. I will erase and redirect the other page. I hope I got it right this time. I accidently erased then reverted History of writing ancient numbers. I reduced this page to a stub (to be redirected later) because the proposed merger was effectedly done a week ago. Sorry for the confusion. " +" We seem to have lost from the lead ""pop"" qua beat music, which they undoubtedly were to begin with. ""Rock"" came much later. When they started, ""rock"" meant ""rock & roll"", which is different. andemu " +My Rollback Request Thanks for granting me the Rollback tool, reverting vandalism going to be much more easier now! +The Afd on Outer. Yes there is quite a list. With no entry that should be included. +" UPA IRC What about 19:00 UTC? e | ταλκ " +" Great changes - hope you don't mind mine! εαίδεια* " +Lilydale v Lillydale I added a small section on this under History. Couldn't think of anywhere more appropriate. +Yes, but they way you stated how incorrect I was was not needed. THIS IS WIKIPEDIA? Then I can say again you're not an admin, so don't act like one. +She mentions it in her bio, probably because she's written several books aimed at teenagers as well as adults. (BTW, I've just added a bunch of refs to said bio to the first few paragraphs.) I think we should retain that info. Cheers, CWC +nad doing nefarious activities +I used the adminhelp template as a precaution. I have twice had talk page access restricted, as a punishment for requesting to be unblocked. Just in case one of those guys made their way back here to deny the request, and restrict talk page access again, I figured I would add the template, and hope if I couldn't use the talk page to request unblock, at least it would be seen. +which adheres to the subject matter +I suggest you try reading some scholarly Greek history. You might learn something about your country. And no, I am not claiming that Greece is Nazi nowadays: but there are facts and lies, and you choose to ignore the facts. Greece is a Balkan country and suffers from some of the defects of the region. +" TPIRFanSteve, wouldn't ya know it, he's causing problems for you! He is a long standing(and I mean LONG STANDING!) problem on this site. I have no idea how he has avoided a ban, but this is ridiculous. He's been basically ""run out on a one way rail"" from the Price Is Right articles and similar, now I notice he's harassing you all over here as well. The best bet is not to confront the troll(which he has proven to be here) and report it to AIV. The more people who report him(in this case, he's harassing editors of a different spectrum), the more likely they'll finally block him. It would be great if they could get the scumbag off here for good. Have a good day. 70.9.93.116 " +" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - '''''' talk " +I am not here to be constructive, I am here to prove that Wikipedia is nothing but a bunch of hypocrites and liars. +hey the part in there about it being named after the Walton who signed the declaration of independence is wrong. It was named after some other walton who donated a bunch of money who lived in the 1930's. im pretty sure its in the agenda +What a crappy rule. just there to make people get their own way, cannot go against a project 194.66.216.40 +Now that you mention it that may be a better idea +Doc See my note on Wikipedia talk:Template doc page pattern. Rgds, Farmbrough 09:36 1 September 2006 (GMT). +) No images (vote here to remove all poo pix +" DEAR Anonymous EE Guy, Well, I don't know if you really mean to give a full picture of the case, but we could include this one: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/reich1.htm http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/ Who are the web site of Jean-Pierre Voyer, a kind of model person for mister Messager/YBM, and who spred a quiet special form for ideologie, which goal is to play with words and how to defend and argue about things who do not exist, how to play with words and ""fuck others"" as phrased on his web site, and essentialy, how to display a superior attitude in order to effectively use the communication on internet to their full interest, by using the circumstances frame of the dialogues. This include displaying lies as being facts with such a forcefullness as to convince others. It is called: postsituationnisme, ideologie who is followed by YBM, together with a sympathie to the 3rd reich, and a, by some, called pseudo-Hégelianism. YBM run his forum where he defend the man and his positions, with as much furore as he dispells those of Igor and Grichka Bogdanov. You will found in it concepts as the Superior Race, versus the inferior race, and different creativs ways to talk the technics and language of publicity into a way of ""mass communication"" and a weapon to convince anyone of anything. I am sure that this angle will bring a certain shade of light where it was upmost needed, and will constitute the missing piece of the puzzle. I hope you will excuse my very late assertion or révélation about this subject, but I was myself only made aware of it for a very short time ago, together with the fact that this Voyer and YBM have harrassed people before, writers too, for books who had nothing to do with science, but nevertheless constituted those 2 mens lifes mening for 2 years. Actually they stopped with their first victims at the end of 2002, beginning of 2003, to consacrate their cherish technics of manipulating the masses, and ideologies of diffamation on 2 other subjects, Igor and Grichka Bogdanov. No need to say that the 2 former victims are still paying for the vices of Voyer and Messager, and that their lifes and career have been destroyed. Why so much hate against people they didn't knew and had never met? They were only practicing, like serial killers start somewhere, in the shadow, and are only known for much more exposed actions. Here are some other links who do compleete the picture: The first attacks of Voyer and YBM against XAVIER, the writer: http://aeamh.free.fr/x/agent.html http://aeamh.free.fr/blockhaus/ http://aeamh.free/bk/index.html YBM Web site: http://aeamh.free.fr Site Voyer: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/reich1.htm http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/ I consider this information for being central in the matter at hand, as all accusations will have fallen and nothing much will have come from the original and following J. Baez paper on the subject if it hadn't been for Messager and Voyers' questionnable work in the name of very questionnable motives, all accomplished to serve a completely useless ideology. I think that this will teach us all a lesson regarding objectivity and our hability to evaluate a given problem properly, and to be able to use our sense of sceptisisme ans sound judgement. On a more general way and even more central here, our power to distinguish between agreeing to a given opinion based on facts, and being manipulate in doing so for all the wrong reasons. This information compleete the picture and gave it its true mening, even if it is by showing how meningsless a huge part of this affair was. Sophie XAL 213.237.21.6 POSTED FOR THE FIRST TIME ON WIKI THE 24/08-2005 AT 8:20 AM. DELEETED 24 TIMES BY YBM. Redeleeted yesterday, reinserted this morning at 4:19AM 28/08-05 " +South Korea International Chart (Top 100) - #1, http://music.mnet.com/Chart/Chart_Genre.asp?GSCode=POP&DateType;=W&ListType;=0 +I am also somewhat curious as to how this was given a LOW assessment for the WikiLaw +Can you give us a source on this??? Thanks! +" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Soccermormon95, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! , talk {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- ! +NopeI've changed it. Looking at Jamaica's constitution in terms of 'what does it mean for Britain' is a rather sad example of Wikipedia's biases. (Incidentally, so is the fact that the only two policy positions we've noticed are the western hobby-horses of the queen and gay rights (not that gay rights aren't fine and dandy, but there are issues of more pressing concern to the average Jamaican). Flower +Dear Garamond Lethe, I will do that next week. Thank you very much for your proposal. +Tactical victory The battle was tactical Axis victory. +"New photos == There has been a concern regarding the photos and from several photographers. We also have not been able to determine if all the photos are from Flickr and could be from other sources. Due to these facts we are inclined to believe that he has obtained these images illegally and have removed them from Wikipedia articles as per WP:COPYRIGHT. Until we have confirmation that such permission to use these photos under a Common license has been granted by each photographer we will continue to remove the images. Attempts have been made to contact Guyfrombronx, and it appears they have been unsuccessful. talk Hi, first comment on wiki so hopefully this works. Can someone put a better picture of City Hall and Nathan Phillips square up? That photo is atrocious. It almost makes me think that whoever put it up hates the square (as some do) and wants to show it's ugly, concrete side (which is does have to some degree). However, on any given day there are usually a lot of people in the square, either skating in the winter, or at some sort of exhibition in the summer (where there are also leaves on the trees, making the concrete seem a bit less onerous). I'll try to get around to taking a pic, but I lost my camera recently, so in the meantime if anyone has one, please do swap them. Thx. == " +User 74.92.27.193 Since you blocked Special:Contributions/74.92.27.193 on the 18th of November, 2010, that IP has made 15 more disruptive edits, all reverted by bots or users. That IP was later blocked on the 21st of January 2011. In all, the user has ignored 11 warnings or blockages to make 31 disruptive edits, all reverted by bots or users, and has made no constructive edits at all, other than a promise to not do it again, after which came the majority of vandalism: 26 more disruptive edits. Copy of this notice sent to +" Quentin Elias Please help me keep an eye out . I am away from Wikipedia about 21 hours a day. Drop me a message if I need to look into anything, or go to WP:AN. Thanks for bringing the COI to our attention. talk " +" Are you quoting somebody there, or is this your own list. I'll try to address the points raised: 1) ""Hearsay"" is rumour received from others that one did not personally hear oneself. That does not describe Table Talk, which is essentially a primary, contemporary source of edited notes taken down by scribes. Mein Kampf I believe was also began as a text dictated by Hitler, rather than written by Hitler - is that hearsay too? And what of notes taken by Speer - is that ""hearsay""? (Interesting you note that Bormann was anti-Catholic. Why then would a ""devout Catholic"" as you term Hitler, appoint an ""anti-Catholic"" as his Private Secretary and the defacto Deputy Fuehrer?) 2) Multiple translations - a valid issue to raise, but given that Hitler and his henchman all, strangely enough, conversed in German, we are dependent on translations in all cases - whether it be Mein Kampf, Inside the Third Reich, or Table Talk. The fact that authors like Kershaw, Bullock, Encyclopedia Brittanica and Toland all quote from Table Talk is evidence of its essential bone fides - though if you are aware of alternative translations provided by reliable sources, please do present them (or bracket them as ""also translated as""). 3) The ""bias"" of the translators. Can you provide reliable sources for this please. 4) I do not know what you mean by ""the Table Talk thoughts do not occur in other private or public conversations"". Table Talk contains all sorts of quotes which are reinforced by other sources! To pluck one from the countless options: Speer (whom you view as a reliable source) says that Hitler made ""harsh pronouncements against the churches to his political associates in Berlin"" and specifically notes that Bormann relished to take down Hitler's harshest comments on the Churches. Goebbels diary (per Kershaw & others) is another source, confirming Hitler's thinking on the Church Struggle. 5) You say ""Nowhere does Hitler denounce Jesus or his own brand of Christianity"". This comment seems to suggest that you are indeed willing to accept the validity of at least some of the Table Talk text. Good. So please note: the text says Hitler believed ""it is certain that Jesus was not a Jew"" and that the Apostle Paul ""falsified"" Jesus' doctrine. These alone are the words of a heretic, not a ""devout Catholic"". Agreed? As a sign of good faith, it would help at this point if you renounced the claim that Hitler was a ""devout Catholic"". Beyond this, the transcripts are thoroughly peppered with denunciations of Christianity. 6) The anti-Christian pronouncements contained in Table Talk are entirely consistent with the Nazi efforts to promote positive Christianity as a substitute for Christianity. The renunciation of the Bible and Jewish origins of Jesus (which ""positive Christianity"" entailed) was to give him a ""false birth certificate"" as Cardinal Michael Faulhaber put it in 1933, and the notion of the myth of blood and soil was, as Pope Pius XI wrote in Mit brennender Sorge in 1937, entirely inconsistent with Catholicism and Christianity more broadly: ""The peak of the revelation as reached in the Gospel of Christ is final and permanent. It knows no retouches by human hand; it admits no substitutes or arbitrary alternatives such as certain leaders pretend to draw from the so-called myth of race and blood"". Hitler, plainly was not in ""good standing with the Church of Rome"" in 1937! " +" Hi. The ""six-month"" expiration was created for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012 page. It's not that sources ""expire"" as you said, but on that primary page, candidates were was broken down into four categories - declared candidates, currently speculated candidates, formerly speculated candidates and declined. So, once a speculated candidate was no longer being speculated about, he or she wasn't deleted, they were simply moved to the ""formerly speculated"" section. Because Senate, Congressional and Gubernatorial elections pages make no distinction between ""currently"" and ""formerly"" speculated candidates, it doesn't apply. Not in this cycle, in the 2014 cycle, in the 2012 cycle or 2010 and so on. Thanks, " +This entire article appears to be describing a business. Confusing to me since this is actually a front for a radical islamic hate group. Uggg, I mean radical christian hate group (i know, same difference). Can we change? Thanks! +That would be an invalid statemnet. The wording is better as-is. +|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes +AQuestion forU What is a mid-life crisis? 86.179.40.116 +" No, the codex does not predict anything. There is a history of German researchers INTERPRETING the same picture as the ""end of the world"" since it all started with Forstemann circa 1880. This ""Mayans predict the end of the world"" thing was given the circa 2012 date by Michael D. Coe and popularized by John Major Jenkins. It is a simple history and you should be able to get it straight. Repeat: Thirteen constellations along the ecliptic, NOT twelve. Also the constellations are of unequal length and so 2016 years is not right. Try 26,000/13=2000. ~*~ Mardyks " +. Better than some of what you've condoned recently +" I still hate you because you destroyed the TOTSE ""Holden DaPenor"" project. 75.57.162.172 " +I have not received any messages from SlimVirgin. Could youo post your questions here and I will try to answer them? +rumor has the dicks explpoded +you can't change consensus with bullying us! if admin board wants to go against consensus then wikipedia is in trouble! +" RE:Illa J and Frank Nitt I was thinking of renaming the actual Yancey Boys article to Yancey Boys (album), in case you would create one about the group. But, you are right. There isn't enough history on the Yancey Boys. (talk • contribs) " +" Or hail. Or snow. Or freezing rain. C'mon, use the right term... >>precipitation<<. // ♫ " +That being said, Ludvikus should ask Batvette what his opinion of socialism/communism is? It may be very revealing... +" Fair use rationale for Image:$1,000,000 Chance of a Lifetime.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:$1,000,000 Chance of a Lifetime.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " +" Right. So we've dealt with the question of Qworty's slander. Let's move on. Here's why you should not be involved in this discussion, Qworty. You have demonstrated - not simply to me; not simply to Wikipedia; but to THE WORLD AT LARGE - that you are incapable of editing in good faith. When the mainstream media characterizes you - Qworty - as a ranting, slanderous, biased editor, then... well, we should take that seriously. I do hope you've read the Salon article about you? If not, let me quote: your screed was interpreted (rightly) as ""an apoplectic defense by one Wikipedia editor of actions that other Wikipedia editors labeled 'revenge editing.' There’s a lot of anger here (not to mention an unhealthy fixation with excrement!). Call me persnickety, but reading Qworty’s comments did not give me the greatest faith in Wikipedia’s internal process for building an encyclopedia of human knowledge."" Those aren't my words, regarding you. They are Salon's. THEY have identified you as an apoplectic, vengeful disgrace, with an unhealthy scatological fixation. So, that's what we're dealing with here: you, Qworty, as the star of an article entitled ""Wikipedia's Shame."" Now, Wikipedia requires that we assume good faith in our fellow editors, which I do, until the most extreme (and frankly comical) evidence points out that we're dealing with someone like you. Since we know that you will do everything within your power to sabotage any entry remotely related to Filipacchi, it's a waste of time to discuss matters of policy with you. I'm happy to debate subtle points of epistemology with almost anyone, into the wee hours of the morning - just not with you. As for Little green rosetta: I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt. Even though she accused me - on the basis of what she termed ""behavioral and technical evidence"" - of using sock puppets. Even though, when that proved to be false (okay, a lie), she didn't apologize, but instead came here to support your - Qworty's - frivolous snark. Despite all of this, I've given her the benefit of the doubt. Now shall we get back to the tedious matter of editing this article? (By ""we,"" I mean me and the editor who hasn't starred in an article entitled ""Wikipedia's Shame."") " +" , I'll adress the issues you've brought up in due time, although I have to say that the tone of your judgement on the quality of this article (""I'm not convinced this is anywhere near GA status"" or ""doesn't even resemble a professional tone of writing"") sounds harsh and unecessary. Maybe a bit more of constructive criticism next time? " +2007 litter act sect 11 is shit, try qld leg with amendmants +Wikipedia pricks Wikipedia's full of fags, like Sean MC Sean, the number one faggot antagonist and my arch enemy Klptyzm, and those bitch administators on the nigger's side! +" Poltergeist I see you have removed the link I recently added to the poltergeist article. Your justification for this is ""fringe paper in a psychic journal on 'strange' sounds, I don't see why this is relevant to this article."" Let's examine that step by step. (1) Fringe paper. The paper is by Dr Barrie G. Colvin. This is what Bloomberg Business says about him: Dr. Barrie G. Colvin is the founder and Managing Director of IFS Chemicals Ltd. Dr. Barrie Colvin is a polyurethane technologist with significant experience in the formulated systems market in Europe. He attended the University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology and obtained a B.Sc. (Honours) degree in Polymer Technology (Chemistry). Following three years of research in the area of X-ray crystallography of polymers, he was awarded a Ph.D. from the same University. In 1973, Barrie Colvin joined Shell Research Ltd. as a polyurethane technologist, specialising in fire-retardant foams and new generation appliance insulation. In 1975, he worked on the development of base polyols for rigid foam applications followed by several years as Technical Manager for a polyurethane systems house in the UK. In 1982, Barrie Colvin founded IFS, a polyurethane formulating company, specialising in rigid and semi-rigid foams as well as speciality elastomers. The IFS Group is committed to the development of more environmentally acceptable polyurethane chemicals, having introduced a zero ODP insulation foam to the commercial refrigeration market in 1988. More recently, the company has successfully implemented the use of polyols based upon natural oils. And this is his profile on LinkedIn: As the principal shareholder (90%) in IFS Chemicals, Envirofoam Chemicals and Bollards International, my main activities centre around the development and manufacture of bespoke chemical systems for a wide variety of industries. My principal expertise is in the formulation of polyurethanes for industrial applications, ranging from insulation products, automotive mouldings, sub-sea pipeline protection systems, various marine applications etc. I have done this type of work all my working life (40 years) and continue to remain very hands-on in the laboratory development of newer, improved systems. The success of these companies can be attributed to the dedication of the staff at our factory in Roydon, Norfolk. Our aim to to [sic] provide customers with the very best, bespoke product for their intended application, backed up by the very best, most experienced field engineers who help to turn chemicals into products. An equally important part of my time involves my participation within the Society for Psychical Research. This organization gets involved with the scientific study of claims of paranormal activity and over the years has included many eminent scientists, including a number of Nobel prizewinners. Many members of the Society have come to recognize that the known laws of physics cannot explain some of the more unusual phenomena that have been shown to exist in the world around us. As an example, there is a wealth of evidence supporting the objective nature of psychokinesis but, as yet, there is no generally accepted theory of how ""mind-over-matter"" might work. I am a member of the Council of the Society for Psychical Research and have been very actively involved with the Spontaneous Cases Committee for some years. Whilst I have been involved with many aspects of the paranormal, my main interest is in the area of poltergeist activity (also known as RSPK—Recurrent Spontaneous PsychoKinesis). (2) Psychic journal. I think I detect a note of disdain. The paper appeared in the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. As indicated by Dr Colvin in his LinkedIn profile, the Society for Psychical Research is dedicated to the scientific study of allegedly paranormal phenomena and its membership has over the years included many eminent scientists, among them a number of Nobel laureates. (3) Strange sounds. Did you read the paper? The strange sounds in question are poltergeist rappings. I am going to restore the link and would be grateful if you would let it stand. " +" Hello , thanks very much for your post. The whole experience has not left me bitter as being so would mean that the trolls have won. I shan't return in a hurry as real life is a bit hectic for me at work, but I shall pop up towards George Robey's TFA to defend it against the vandals and POV pushers. I'm glad you liked my work, that means a lot coming from an editor such as yourself. I hope we can collaborate some day in the future. talk " +Release Date goes earlier again? The Windows Vista consumer release countdown at the Official Windows Vista website's The Community page, it said 4 days to go to release Windows Vista. So will be release Windows Vista on January 28, 2007 (earlier 2 days from January 30) for consumers customers. Can we change the release date? '''''''' Talk'' +and seriously running to the admin right away because i did that, that isnt harrassment, thats me just trying to get the message through your head that there was no reason to mark that. you need to give people more time when they are slowly piecing a page together and not going all trigger happy on deleting every little thing you havent heard about personally. +Cooldown failed Unfortunately the 24 hour cooldown did not help. is continuing the personal attacks and the elated tone. Calling the other person a liar and using straw men arguments is not a good basis for constructive discussion. +since i created the button king and golden eagle regional park pages from scratch, i thought that showed i was building the wikipedia. anyway enjoy not having me around +" (UTC) Ja-Square I normally only salt after three recreations, but I've done so here after two because I've also indefinitely blocked the creator of the second version for a violation of our user name policy. The original creator may or may not be the same person, but there is no overlap at all between their edits, so no grounds for action at present. Thanks - talk to me? 13:14, 13 January 2016" +27 23:33, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC) +Verdiculous You removed the word Verdiculous... I just wanted you to know that (YOU ARE WRONG). So if you want to remove it because you don't agree, thats fine but please remember this Adolf just cause you don't know about it does not mean that it is not out there. +Thank you for cleaning up the mess If you want to know what I am talking about consider 'What part of an Under Construction tag can people NOT understand?' Thanks, Now I can depart in peace. +sticking to the facts at hand unless you yourself actually comment on the facts at hand, which you haven't done yet +And you removed it! You numbskull! I don't care what you say anymore, this is my life! Go ahead with your own life, leave me alone! — +promote Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, Southern Ocean +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Shield volcano. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''' Lets talk! " +Not an attack, just an evaluation based on a number of bogus and invented information added to lots of articles by +Also, the Makdisi 1999 citation lacks a page, which makes the claim harder to check. It is good practice to remove weasel words when you find them, ideally rewriting the sentence to an unambiguous verifiable statement. +" And I could ask Mr. Deng the same question. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ""you are always wrong"" are not welcome. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen." +earlier i had done so ...but now its of no use. see my talk page she claims the same thing again and again. the version put by me has no problem. she has problem with word superstar. now iam going to revert BEWFAI and Sitapur ki geeta to my version again. ask her to stop making reverts or edits to such articles in this manner. +a fight and argument'''. Also, I am very stingy and I am a retard, spastic and I smell like a donkey's feces +Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on spam Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and how to develop articles Help pages Tutorial Article wizard for creating new articles Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! +Okay. This particular revision can revert. Your thinking is reasonable. 98.217.223.13 +unblock and thanks, +I don't give a flying fuck. block me I Don't care. kiss my goddamn ass. DUSTIN Motherfucking D +" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to William Shakespeare, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk " +Classic Rock Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! +" translation problem I am translating this article to Chinese wikipedia. Somebody has different understanding with me about this sentence, ""Beyond just using the same deb package format, Ubuntu has very strong links with the Debian community, contributing any changes directly and immediately, rather than announcing them only at release time."" Who contributs any changes directly and immediately? I think it is Ubuntu. But he insists it should be Debian. 28 June 2005 12:26 (UTC)" +" was anyone else there for the catastro-fu*k last night? I was witness to a angry mob of thousands of beta players who didnt get to play crackdown. I think we should write a sentence or two about the threads on the bungie.net forum, something about the fact that thousands skipped school/work to play the beta but were unable, and about Bungie's unresponsiveness. If any info about all these things is needed I can provide it. Jesus. In the venerable words of Church, you could bitch about anything. You missed a few hours of being priveliged enough to test the greatest game of all time ever, Bungie kick their arses to get it up and running well within 24 hours, and as an apology extend the beta by FOUR DAYS over a weekend so we get to play to our hearts content for many many many hours longer, and you thank them by accusing them of inaction and apathy... could you get any pettier? Struth fellas, lighten up. Thank you. I was trying to get it through their skulls to lighten up though. I was also a witness to the amount of irresponsible flaming and hate mail that they posted in Bungie's Forum. I was ashamed to be among them waiting for the Demo. There were a few individuals whom took the news of the whole bug issue more professionally than those who just posted ""OMGZ THE DOWNLOADZ NOT WORKZ!"" It is sad that this world now has people this childish. The beta is fantastic.. Its unreal. " +" What? Why? This is crazy. If you look just above, I did not even respond to the personal attacks of the guy who came here to called me ""drama queen"" and ""fanboy"" with a ""little heart"". I just told him to ""stop"" (on his talk page) - I didn't even report him (but maybe now I do... okay, name's ""Otto4711"", as you see - what now?). Or do you mean the guy who came here accusing me of ""engaging in sockpuppetry"" - this after I stated I don't care anymore and I even unwatched this article, and for sure did not edit in ANY way? If so, I'm going to his page and say he's ""engaging in bestiality"" and demand him to stop - same grounding in facts, probably, but I see stupid accusations are perfectly okay, just saying they're in fact ""stupid"" is a crime of some sort. If none of these, then I just have no idea. Category:Requests for unblock" +I agree. The page needs to have the information included, as it is relevant. It should at least be protective to ward off censorship from vindictive alphi phi members. +Thanks. I've also added this content to the main drive page at AfC Buddy scoring script. (talk) +Because someone hat put The mr. Men Show on the coming soon Section without any sources so I Can't Help It! +" You've got to be kidding me. You accuse me of personal attackes when accountless User:172.56.11.26 has now ""suddenly taken an inteterest in articles I was editing"", why is that ? Because they want to harrass me and they have also personally attacked me by making remarks on the Gary Gabelich talk page about the ancestry of the man (I am Yugoslav as is Gabelich). This user who is now personally attacked me via stalking of articles I edited is now using racism to get back at me. A Biographical article is not only about one acheivement, but ones whole life and that includes ancestry. That abusive user 172.56.11.26 is going to sabotage that article to get back at me, and you're protecting him. he accused me of ""vandalism"" when all I did was make the article conform to Biographical standards and moreover to back me up a higher level editor reverted his reversion of my sensible edit. So who is the real vandal ? - Another contention that I ran into was some want to promote Gary's parents ethnicity above his LSR. He is famous as a world record breaker and not for his ethnicity which likely would of been of little concern in the SOCAL American drag scene of the 1960's. It is included under his personal life. Much information about his family was also added. 172.56.11.26 (talk) If that's not a personal attack against me disguised as a legitimate edit I dont know what is. PLease delete my account, I am dont with you nasty, dispicable people " +Media:Example.oggMedia:Example.oggMedia:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here +Don't mind Freepsbane he is a troll.70.107.183.115 +Idiot, if you want to block me only block or delete me. Highly appreciated if so. Don't block or delete others based on my words. Did you block other two ? What a stupid administrators you people. No common sense. (Himesh) +How did I get here? I am not good with computer. +Not done: Nothing wrong with the source, or the context of the article. +Ok, thanks for your help! +The previous format of the page provides a better insight into the problem, you haven't explained yet why the categorisation of the different uses of the term is necessarily something bad. The POV/nationalist fights have nothing to do with the format of the article, they'll continue in this format, as well. You have erased half the entries on top of it - the ones from the geographical section. +Arguments, not shallow ironies, please. +Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia. Just wanted to let you know, you are not allowed to edit other's user pages, but you can create an account and make your own. Thank you! +I reached out to User talk:GoodDay as well, as 26 POV edits came in, with no real rationale. +Hey man, I think you are cool. I loved it when you reported that idiot Dark-Hooded dufus. Anyway, should we be best friends here?User:Pic Business +Yeah, I know I have, I don't care about the incivility, don't you blokes listen? What I want is for you to reply to my posting instead of just saying the same thing, what I am being blocked for is not the problem, why you won't tell me why you won't disbale the sockpup block is. +Abrahamic accounts of origin Ems2, could you please explain why you don't accept this wording? I find it quite satisfactory, as it references the fact that multiple religions that believe in creationism have the same root, and it does so without being overly wordy. +When did you create your website? The idea of news editing like that is great and I believe it has potential to be common-day news name. If you can fix up the website design and format. Sopher99 (talk) We've been up for a few months, trying to get the userbase up, hence the message. ) Feel free to give me feedback on what you think we should change about the design and format. Sorry for all this cristism but you may also in the future want to change the website name. Quippd is a hard one for people to remember.Sopher99 (talk) I think names grow on you. Think about something like Wii or Twitter. I'm not sure it is a huge issue, but I will definitely keep it in mind. +" WJJA/MeTV I'll be working on merging everything seemlessly later tonight when I get home to WJJA ). '''''' • (chatter) " +" You have now cited only one source (albeit only in the edit summary) The New York Times. Apparently, however, you are unaware of the close personal relationship between Lindbergh and the author of that paper's stories, Times' aviation writer Lauren ""Deac"" Lyman, which went back to 1927 when Lyman befriended a then unknown Lindbergh. Lyman was the only member of the press whom Lindbergh told about his decision to go into self exile in Europe, and he did so because he knew that Lyman would paint this actions in terms most favorable to his friend and, with Lindbergh deliberately ""unavailable at sea"" for more than a week, that this ""spin"" would initially be repeated by other papers that would pick up the NYT story from that paper's news service. This relationship and the tone of the resulting early accounts based on are addressed in detail in the cited TIME Magazine article on the issue of press coverage published on January 6th. (""Since Colonel Lindbergh had offered no public explanation of his departure, and radiograms sent to him on the American Importer were returned with the notation ""Addressee not aboard,"" the Times' story remained the scripture on which the week's exegesis was built. It was written by bespectacled Lauren D. (""Deac"") Lyman, who as the Times' aviation editor befriended obscure young Aviator Lindbergh before his flight to Paris in 1927. Throughout the week Reporter Lyman stoutly refused to reveal the source of his scoop. But Colonel Lindbergh's hatred of certain sensational newspapers, and his corresponding affection for the courteous Times, have long been well-known. ... In keeping with the Times' policy of protecting Hero Lindbergh's privacy, Reporter Lyman weakened his otherwise first-rate scoop by failing to disclose the time and place of the Lindberghs' sailing, their ship's name, their exact destination."") As Lindbergh's real intentions became known his intention to live in exile in Europe it then became clear that this was not just a vacation abroad but that Lindbergh had ""fled"" the country to protect them from danger that he felt that he and his family were being exposed to in the United States and that he would be living in Europe indefinitely. Aside from the Times, you have again failed to provide any citations or sources that support your claim that ""the number of sources which use the neutral ""left"" is huge compared with the single source for ""fleeing""."" (You also have also again misrepresented the number of sources that I have provided which is FOUR, not one.) You have also claimed that I apparently believe that ""flight"" and ""sailed"" are the identical word to ""fleeing"" when I have made no such claim. Sailed only describes the mode of transportation he used (a ship), nothing more. (The word I was emphasizing with ""sailed"" was ""furtively"".) The term ""flight"", however, is the noun that describes the event associated the adjective ""fleeing"" and verb ""fled"". " +in the news This page has been mentioned in a Times of India article. Thanks to all the people contributing to and maintaining it. 23:54, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) +Murtuza Didn't get the memo This is an Cellular IP that is randomly assigned and changes frequently (1 Day at best). Messages are likely to not be received if they are posted more than a couple of hours within the last post. +" Right to vanish See the article Wikipedia:Right to vanish. | Talk " +" Hey, I think the article is too short to be a DYK... Wikipedia:DYK#Selection criteria  • talk " +LUL, THANKS FOR REVERTING THE VANDALISM THAT WAS DONE TO MY TALK PAGE. UU RULE +im warning you dont touch my page geez its not so hard +REDIRECT User talk:Steven Zhang/Archive 14 +" Good point, now deleted. thanks for the editnotice advice I'll look at that later. SpielChequers " +I ask that you take this information into account when reviewing my block. +Expansion I can handle the expansion, give me a day or so. +This is not GOOD at all on the micro chip implants!!!!! People WAKE up!!!!!! +geotechdata.info Well if they keep doing it there is always the spam Blacklist. +" seems about right. nableezy - " +found what you were looking for http://www.webcitation.org/5w6v3lCn2 this link says it clear as day, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex differ from the original manga and film. +" Fixed, thanks. Not sure how that happened. –'''''' | Talk " +Is this page going to be changed? It still says country: 'United Kingdon' when it should say Northern Ireland. +Please Explain Blocking Dear Jamie, Thank you for your hard work to keep Wikipedia accurate and meaningful. Would you have a moment to explain what it is you do there, and the criteria you use? +, 2 September 2006 (UTC) I'm very sorry, but including copyrighted lyrics in Wikipedia is not allowed: See Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry. I have also removed the copyright violation at Science Fiction/Double Feature. 19:22 +I contacted both CounterPunch and Werther to appraise them of my copyright violation, and make recompense. Thank you for reducing the material to a single hyperlink. In the future, I will take more time a care to locate the proper address and use that solely in place of copy/past. Thank you. +Ah go right to hell if it aint on MTV you dont care just goes to show how narrow-minded America is. +Indeed, Wikipedia does not have a standard form of referencing. But it does have a usual form, and this article doesn't use it. To my eyes, this makes it look odd. It reads like an academic paper, which may be useful in more academic WP articles, but I don't see the point in a relatively mainstream article like this, it just breaks things up unnecessarily. Yes, citations are important in any Wikipedia article, but they have more or less importance depending on the context - here I would say they are not of high importance and are given undue prominence. Just my opinion though - there'd need to be a fairly strong consensus of agreement with me to justify going through and changing it. Chat +This is probably the Thread +BTW I've noticed your page, and with all those little boxes on it, I must say, you are definately one of those no-life wikis! thanks, +" Seasonal Greets! Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!'Hello Chzz, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, ''" +Me? Arguing? Go fuck yourself. I'm not the one creating multiple accounts, vandalizing, leaving, and coming back and vandalizing again. Pwheadlines sucks. I have relatives who work backstage in WWE and TNA. I am also training to become a professional wrestler, and I'm training in Neo Spirit Pro Wrestling here in Ontario. They were going to abandon the fucking title and bring in a new title. Now shut up and go get yourself blocked again. +Cant add steel cage link I cant seem to add the link to the steel cage article. +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  └''''''/talk┐ Thanks Thanks for reporting , I've blocked them temporarily. └''''''/talk┐ +Great job, guys! I started editing this page some time ago in hopes of giving a little more background on our fair city, but those that came after the fact REALLY jazzed up this thing. Excellent information abounds! Thanks a lot for the hard work, editors! Knoxville appreciates you! -) 67.187.111.107 +Speculation and opinion If this article is going to be subject to continual rewrites without facts based on one persons bias, then the offender should be stopped ! +" for starters we have Links to Avoid #13: ""Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject"" Hepatitis C and Watersports (urine) Watersports for HIV+ people These two links are about watersports AND ____, while the article is simply about Watersports. They are also clearly in violation ""Important points to remember #5"" - ""avoid separate links to multiple pages in the same website"" Then take a look at the rest of the links under the lens of Links to Avoid #11 ""Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority"" It is completely unclear who is responsible for any of the websites and so we cannot know if the author(s) are 'recognized authorities' or if these sites are purely original research. So, how do any of the above links qualify to be included as external link? 207.69.139.144 " +" Do reliable sources say that all these relationships are ""non-sexual"" ? Or is that an interpretation being imposed by a Wikipedia editor with an agenda? As to your statement ""Under the law they are married differently"", can you cite the law to which you refer? 101.164.1.138 " +REDIRECT Talk:Doctor Who: Destiny of the Doctors +ServantofAllah93, you continue to make diplomatic statements but you are also continuing to revert the article, for example this edit at 00:49 on 3 October. This must not continue. I recommend that you take a break of at least 48 hours from all editing of the article Zakir Naik, regardless of how wrong you may think it to be. Make your case for any changes at Talk:Zakir Naik and wait for others to reach a conclusion. Thank you, +I responded to all of your posts. Kingdom existed until 29 November 1945; DF Yugoslavia never recognized to be a monarchy. It was under firm communist control. Its leadership didn't even allow King to return to the country after the war. How then you can say it was a monarchy? If we put in place your version of this list, it will remove Drago Marusic as Prime Minister in 1945, between Ivan Subasic and Tito. If you agree to left him on the list, we can struck a deal and resolve all of this. +Still you supply no policy. Evidently you can't read, so there's no point in writing more. +" Category:Suicides by jumping from a height Please add ""Category:Suicides by jumping from a height"" when it us unlocked. " +I was gonna ask if Obi Wan ever refers to him as Anakin indirectly and should we go to some pointless effort to insert that into the plot there too. His real name is unimportant, so unimportant that the guy says he killed Ben and Ben is dead, so it's not even a name he considers real, he's become someone else. / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! +Oh shit, stop sending warning, please, fuck you, Jessie is cancelled and replaced by Rick and Morty. +It's a blatant violation of WP:BLP, especially using primary sources to insult another living person. If you reinstate the edit without reliable, secondary sources (not one from his website), you run the risk of being blocked. +"::::::ONIH etc, without meaning to be uncivil; yer full of it! The Irish State does not endorse knee-capping or ""extrajudicial shooting, and plenty of bombs, and punishment beatings and kindnappings and internment-without-trial."" In the same way ""The West"" claims (endlessly) moral superiority over China, the Muslim world, Communist States etc etc etc I thing Eire (and many other European countries) can indeed claim substantial moral superiority over other Western countries; most specifically the US and UK. Which isn't to say Eire is innocent; but in the real world all things are relative. " +" Tagging of Irish Defence Forces pictures Your bot recently hit . This is tagged with Ireland-IDF which clearly states: ""This work is copyrighted. This image is a work of the Irish Defence Forces (IDF) or an IDF employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties. Reproduction of material from this website (www.millitary.ie) is authorised for personal use. Reproduction for other uses is permitted, provided that the source is acknowledged. See the IDF copyright policy for more details."" The source is acknowledged by the template and the image is therefore fully authorised. " +I didn't vandalise any page, I actually RESTORED the OUCA info page to its orignal state you jerk. +http://spam.alumni.net Adsense pub-9293773450788345 Spam sock accounts Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. +But it is merely a curiosity at this point, so I guess I'll live with it being removed. +Constantine got dumped by Molly, but no one knows why. Molly dumped him because she thought that Constantine thinks of himself as a sexy beast. He actually looks like a something Winnie the Pooh would find in the bathroom. Constantine still thinks that Molly likes him, but she actually wants to kill Constantine for being so ugly. Mike Polito +Support per rationale forwarded by BarrelProof. +Why is it that nobody will respond? +RE: Hulk changes. Fuck off idiot. user coldbrotha +Hi I do not wish to argue however in the article itself, it implicitly mentions how the Greeks retreated to Mathura from Pataliputra many times in the article which is sourced therefore by logic Mathura should definately be within the border. I am not fabricating original research as it is all already in the article. It would be appropriate if you were to provide sources contradicting their occupation of such areas within those dates if the article is wrong. As for the lines drawn, as far as I've seen in books they are only used to show the movement of armies in detailed books of military campaigns and are never shown on a map depicting the extent of a kingdom. As mentioned before due to the other articles following such a rule the border should enclose Pataliputra as an occupation period of 8 years is enough I think especially if many other pages include territories that have been held for only a year and these articles (mentioned above) have been peer reviewed. +Psycho == Why do you keep telling us that our page is being vandalized!!!??? It is our page! Can we do what we want? Nobody likes you! You are such a dickhead! You lesbian butch! ~~Colleen&Vanessa; == +persyour retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded onal +Borda fixed point OK, you reverted a the talk:borda fixed point page. I don't think that this is correct. I will now remove, anyhow, the listing of the paragraph that you took offense of, and hope that this will allow you to give me the time out that I wanted. If not, please help me through the required mediation process. +":::::::::::And I really don't think ""Islamic empire"" was ever meant to be anything but a kind of dabpage. As a historical periodization it's hopeless vague both geographically (West Africa to India and beyond) and chronologically (7th century right up to the modern era). There have been Islamic empires for sure, but it doesn't make them much more homogenous than ""Christian empires"". Isotalo " +Stop vandalising people's hard work. You don't know anything about most subjects, so just kill yourself. And don't act like your all tough sitting behind a computer criticizing other people. P.S. Your mom is a dirty whore. +Regarding edits such as I would appreciate if you would stop making up lies about me. That is a form of personal attack, which you have already been blocked for. I have asked you nicely. I do not want to have to ask again. Please stop. Thank you. +Your revision on Oct 22, 2008 of St. Bede's Catholic Comprehensive School, by removing the external links and putting graffiti up, is termed as vandalism. You have been reported to wikipedia. Deathardath +It's useful to see that's the best position for the song and has nothing to do with POV. WP:CHARTS doesn't play a big roll because of Wikipedia:Ignore all rules. But maybe do not understand... +I have restored the IPA pronunciation. Hangul and IPA pronunciation serve different purposes. IPA pronunciation is only for pronunciation, not spelling. As an ending consonant (받침), 'ㅅ' is pronounced as 'ㄷ', which is pronounced as 't' in IPA. 24.26.128.185 +You're right. I had two windows open (one on my talk page, and one at Stan Jacobsen), and the connection dropped before the edit was made. Sorry about that. +I've suggested a way forward on Scripturalreasoning's talk page. +Not my links. I don't do links much. +Welll well, who else would the Tatar turn to apart from the Malakas. We are not FYROMians, we're MACEDONIANS! +How does a lack of source for one bit of the article mean that I shouldn't remove biased material in another bit? Your insistence on including an opinion and believing that it's somehow objective fact is kind of pathetic now. 190.46.98.195 +POV-pushing Whoever is editing the Gustav III article from this IP - and reverting edits there - is advised herewith that unsourced and non-factual information about a person's sex life does not belong in any bio. The IP will be block-requested if such editing continues. +Goodbye wikipedia, hope you get you stuff straight, because all the stuff in the records and milestones is correct information, hope it stays one there, it makes the page unique +. Just one example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanki_Online +" Season's Greetings! ;"" class=""plainlinks""> Hello Everymorning: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 1000 " +" I'd guess this is a single individual with a dynamic IP address. If he can reset his address by unplugging his dsl or cable modem or forcing a DHCP reset, there is no point to a long term block. 24 hours is probably more than sufficient, by that time he will have moved on to another address. I gather there are some ""senior"" people working on this (other checkusers, arbcom, etc.) Thatcher " +" That is not a insult. That is a reality, that link is a lint to a racist group. And armenian grow up their children with racism. They send their children to ""genocide camps"" and teach them how barbarian Turks are making genocide(!). If you dont believe me please ask an Armenian user. " +"Rob, you can go to hell. Leave my userpage alone. X " +"==Ricky Rubio i Vives== Ricky Rubio is from El Masnou, Barcelona. He is a Catalan. He speaks Catalan at home. Therefore, his name is Catalan (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Spanish_naming_customs#Catalan_names). That's why his name is Ricard. If his name were Spanish, he would be ""Ricardo"". Watch one of the last games, the Wolves fans have made a flag half Catalonia, half Minnesota. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Well I don't need ESPN, I've seen him many times speaking in Catalan on TV. It's his mother tongue, although he is fully bilingual with Spanish, as most Catalans -like myself- are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I understand we have to use sources. But would you provide a link to prove that, let's say, LeBron James mother tongue is English? That'd be ridiculous, right? You would provide a link to prove, if that were the case, that his mother tongue be French. It's the same: Ricard is a Catalan name, he is from a town near Barcelona -capital of Catalonia-, he speaks Catalan at home, therefore his name follows Catalan rules. Oh please, before anybody criticizes my grammar, check the entry for English subjunctive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.17.119.121 I shouldn't make assumptions? You are the one making assumptions -you reverted somebody's change (""According to?"" 00:48, 3 January 2012‎) based on your assumption that Ricky Rubio must be Spanish speaking. Ricard is not a exotic name in Barcelona: it is a Catalan name. Well, I don't want to argue anymore. Just watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYFCBGbJv4A and you can see how Ricky addresses his family, friends, schoolmates and teachers in Catalan -with subtitles in Spanish. When he talks to the journalists, he does it in Spanish, since it is a Spanish TV station doing the documentary on him -personal life as well as the beginning as a professional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.17.119.121 Carter It's not us who get in trouble. All it they do is just take it down anyway. If you had any references to nba.com, you'd also notice that many of those citations are gone. Anyway, there's many other sites that features videos and articles that have the same material.. so I'll find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) Because you're taking them out, someone else is now filling in words in teh article liek (by whoe, when, etc.. They're not errors when you go to any other athlete and see much less references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) I would assume that Jalen Rose and Vince Carter got permission from the NBA since Carter's still a player and Rose is a broadcaster. Besides, why are your being so picky with this article that I've spent some time trying to fix. I don't know all the rules just yet, but let me learn as I go and correct them. I ask you not to delete the references I tried to dig up. I will modify them as I go along. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) google and youtube has come out with a program to detect copyright issues. And again, when +" One thing you should know about me I really hate it when people use the word ""spam"" about me. My comment was just an information that i will save this article before it probably cease to exist. I handle so in german Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with spam! I always use to save articles to Wikia projects when they're on deletion log. Keep that in mind and don't call that word anymore due to my presence " +" Simply put.. The man was a complete fake. A maniacal, propaganda-induced disgrace to the United States who would force his 7-month pregnant wife on unnecessary flights across the country. Bruno Richard Hauptman was innocent, 100%. Lindbergh killed his own son. Unfortunately in light of his ""pop culture"" status, nobody would've even thought that could be remotely possible. Lindbergh killed his own son, know the facts!" +" It isn't in the mainspace. It is still in your sandbox. Click the link you just linked. — ☎ " +Adrienne Shelly This is directed at you: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adrienne_Shelly&diff;=296721755&oldid;=295519387 Don't be so goddamn lazy. 99.164.68.102 +" The national motto of Turkey Our national motto is ""Yurtta Barış, Dünyada Barış"" which translates to ""Peace at home, peace in the world"" This motto used to be present on the article but has thenceforth been removed. It is a key motto in Turkey's modern self and the reader would benefit greatly from knowing this motto when wanting to learn about Turkey" +Then you can see here for instructions: es:Wikipedia:Babel –'''' +Toto? Why is Toto at the bottom of the page? xD 98.217.61.141 +In case my words were misconstrued, I was not criticizing your POV and indeed I also believe that it is easier to avoid writing in a POV style when others are aware of what your POV is. It is exactly this reason why I noted that your contributions seem to tend towards your POV. As for my own POV, if one can call it that, I don't have an in depth knowledge of the subject and I'm not Roman Catholic. I merely stumbled upon an article which seemed to have two editors with conflicting ideas (Jonathan Tweet and Lima) and as such I hope to format current information rather than introduce new information. I feel I am fairly unbiased, but I believe that the lead should deal more with the definition and explanation of the subject matter than going in depth about its history or disputation. As for going forward, I suggest the following. Once we receive GoldenMeadows' lead draft we'll have three drafts, from which we can choose one to refine and extend (probably incorporating elements from the other drafts as well). Hopefully this will result in a lead which both follows Wikipedia's principles and is accepted by all. +" Jessie Stephen " +What's a troll? Somone whose not a lying leftist parasite like you? Always remember. You are not a scientist. You are a public tit science worker. I can see you are not up to coming up with any evidence for your ridiculous level of certitude in these matters. I thought you people had rules against useless idiots like Willian insulting people. You want to get rid of some of your dead wood +" Welp. I could remove the topic of theosophy from the segment, but ""spiritual density"" as a new age term has moved beyond theosophy, as has the entire branch of this type of cosmological model. I have only really recently just written the article... ... references to individuals listed are as examples of a higher-degree of thinking and that of service orientation. ... the original theosophical model was only the root... many ideas since have surfaced, I have tried to synthesize it the best way I could since when I stumbled upon this article it was a stub. How should I best fix it according to the above clarification? - ironyWrit" +I'm confused... About your comment on WT:FAC. I've always interspersed my replies to comments by reviewers, although I do sign each reply - you've never complained at my FACs�? I'm unsure what I should be doing ... - Talk +" Oh I see - thanks very much for sorthing that out.DrChrissy (talk) " +Renzoy16 ! Shut The Fuck Up +" Title is misleading... As the object is actually a copy of the original, is it not misleading to say it's a ""bust by Houdon""? - Talk " +OH DO YOU REALLY - WHO CARES WHAT YOU THINK +"I wish to echo Soap in encouraging you to stick with it and run again. Usually people are advised to wait at the least three months before running again, but if you wait more than that it shows a lot of patience. I would definitely advise remaining active and running again. You are honestly a great candidate and if you are still interested in running in a couple of months you can feel free to approach me for a nomination if you so desire. If you don't want me to nominate you, that's okyou can still count on my support. Best of luck, (talk) " +Formatting i think it would be more convenient if the tracklistings were formatted like featured here. - MaJic +Hub== I made a bunch of changes to the hub section. Any feedback/editing would be welcome. If anyone would like to talk about coaster brake hubs and internally geared hubs I would love someone else describing them. == +I can tell you that in Baghdadthe shit that goes down would make any thing that goes on in Englewood look like a Nickelodeon show! And make the hardest guy in Englewood cry for his mother and look like a stright BITCH! +Visa 4266841355696699/0317 544 Renu Timilsina 905 Spencer Ave Santa Rosa CA 95404 7073189467 u2timilsina@hotmail.com VISA 4266841268957642 /0116 199 Jacky Reid 3848 Orchard Dr Hammond IN 46323 2192014408 tedybear_1962@yahoo.com Vickie Louise Daniels 01/23/1963 5275190003794910 08/18 595 William R Carruth 1084 Park St Gainesville GA 30501 6786304350 kwandu1@yahoo.com ma:-5480420020697239 exp:-12/17 cvv:-275 cch:-Milton N peroutka billing add:- 6521 232 street west warsaw mn 55087 billing ph:-5073345289 ape-joeperoutka@yahoo.com ax:-379761285142006 exp:-12/19 cvv:-6268 cch:-judith e simonian billing add:- 231 east 5th street apt 5 ny ny10003 billing ph:-9172808473 ape-judysimonian@gmail.com ma:-5114250113022688 exp:-06/17 cvv:-133 cch:-thy ho billing add:-16030 stable point lane cypress tx 77429 billing ph:-2816178985 ape-kth6274@yahoo.com 1.nm1haller/bernard dob - 07/20/1937 ape - bj2005@bellsouth.net visa 4388576076497737 07/16 290 bernard j haller 843-767-5181 107 river oak lane charleston SC 29418,usa DNIS - 8559532716 2.nm1wilkes/rex dob - 04/19/1965 ape - rex_wilkes@yahoo.com A/L P.N.R - M622654 P.N.R - LSXWDU master 5332480249395064 09/17 000 lisa l wilkes 517-708-7959 3216 maloney street lansing MI 48911 DNIS - 8555743092 3.nm1raines/raycen dob - 10/23/1975 ape - raycenraines@gmail.com A/L P.N.R - M623213 P.N.R - XCORAW visa 4426441026950281 07/15 573 raycen raines 206-406-3325 po box 6048 pineridge SD 57770,usa DNIS - 8555743092 4.nm1rotgin/rochelle m dob - 10/25/1944 ape - rmrotgin@aol.com A/L P.N.R - YCG4GQ P.N.R - QUMPFF master 5466160127371548 01/19 090 rochelle m rotgin 516-623-5011 2277 halyarz drive merrick NY 11566, usa DNIS - 8556304628 5.nm1reid/brenda dob - 01/11/1955 nm1reid/clyde s dob - 03/04/1955 ape - brendastar55@gmail.com A/L P.N.R - 878660 P.N.R - LOKDQK visa 4563230007871035 08/16 257 brenda reid 347-217-4194 642 vincent ave bronx NY 10465,usa DNIS - 8555743091 25OCT55/M//YUMUL/IFAGANI TIAZ 27 RM CCV-564 28 RM CCH-ZENAIDA YUMUL 29 RM BILL ADD-1156 BAY CIRCLE LINA OH,45801 30 RM BASE FARE 713.00/TAXES 503.91/MCO 169.00/SUPP FEE 05.00/TTL AMT 1390.91 CA5414137070030118/0417 419 229 2559 IYUMUL@LIMACITYSCHOOL.ORG 4192292559 +It is possible I did some mistake. +She's not best known as something from Sonic She is easily best known as Phil and Lil from Rugrats, come on, the show lasted what, ten+ years and had a few movies, how would a character on a show that nobody but sonic fans remembers be remembered more than Phil and Lil? +" Almonds From dsduani: WLU, I am new at this and wonder if this is the right place to respond to your edits. Let me know if this is not the case. In your recent edit on almonds you stated that almond is often substituted for vanilla by diabetics. Both almond and vanilla extract have about the same amount of sugar and calories so I'm not sure if this is useful information. Diabetics may substitute one for the other but I don't think it has any effect on their diabetes or diabetic diet. I'm replying on your talk page. My smile for the week I just wanted say ""thank you"" for the barnshine. I keep meaning to say so but everytime I log in I see something that irks me and then off I go. I'm kind of a flake like that. I noticed your ArbCom deal, good luck with that. I hope a happy solution could be found for all parties involved, even if you and I are often on the same page when it comes to all of that. Cheers. Emboldening (moved from user page ) Just thought I'd give you a chill by answering over here. Regarding the use of bold/italics, I can't quote you the official rule, but in the ""real world"", titles for long works are either italicized or underlined, and as far as I've seen on wikipedia the same holds true here. Bold is only used for the subject of the article in the first sentence and generally for emphasis. - Oops! Sorry about the user page thing. Total brainfart. - Images need removed Please remove these images from your user page as they are in violation with WP:FAIR#Policy, number 9, since no fair use images can be used on user pages. Thanks. :Image:Red Mage.gif :Image:FF1 USA boxart.jpg :Image:Final Fantasy I Battle.png :Image:Stan.png :Image:Eric.png Squeaky here Hi, thanks for the note you left me regarding my article on Bridget Taylor. A few points if I may. I'm new to this so I'm not really good at. I don't think you hate me and I see how much obviously better the article is with your edits. So I'm actually grateful. You are really good at this, I'm not but I'd like to learn. So seeing the changes that you made to my original, I can't help but agree they improved the article, every one of them. So no complaints here.You have my thanks. Just to clear up a couple of kind of misconceptions. I really had no agenda. I don't know Bridget Taylor, I wasn't promoting her in the sense of I think she needs to be promoted. If I was promoting her it's more because I have become a huge user of wikipedia myself. It's become the first place I go to research any subject, person, place or thing. Given that, I totally respect the fact you are such a great editor. As a user of the information provided here, I also hope that the subject matter is comprehensive, fact filled, current, and factual. So again, I am not offended by the need for editing; rather I welcome it. Getting back to my agenda. I became aware of Bridget Taylor through a child with autism and did some research on her background. I found that she is widely considered to be the leading expert practicing the use of ABA therapy and that she is truly a tireless advocate for autistic children and adults. My sole agenda honestly was not to promote her but to have her listed in wikipedia. When the parents of child get the dreaded diagnosis of autism, they tend to search for everything and anything in their power to help their child. I've learned in my research that Taylor 's work and practice are of the utmost importance, especially to the parents of very young children first diagnosed. The Alpine Learning Group is arguably (but not many would argue the point) the best placement for an autistic child in the country. So given what I had learned from my research I just thought it was very important to growing segment of the population that Taylor just be listed in wikipedia. Honestly, I'm without agenda. In fact, I'm not a ""fan"" of ABA therapy. It is, however, the only scientific method proven to help autisic children learn. Which is a valuable thing. A parent can use dietary supplements, adjunct therapies, etc. which I totally support. In the meantime while waiting to see the results, there is a small window of opportunity when a child's brain is still pliable and they are at their peak learning age. That window goes from maybe 3-6 years old. So, to me, it seems very important to use what we have available (ABA therapy) so that child, all autistic children make the strides they are able to make in lear +WHY DID YOU EDIT THE ARTICLE ON KURDISTAN? DID YOU READ THIS DISCUSSIONS BEFORE YOU MADE THE CHANGES? They are adding silly things to the article. +" LOL, still evading my question? Where is the source that ""mulatto"" is a ""socially acceptable"" term? The current ""source"" references another source which doesn't say at all what the first source ""referenced"". " +Well, I think you've actually demonstrated that a block may be effective in that the vandal might not be able to come back to the page he/she vandalized but obviously, collateral damage is the issue and that is known already. In the case of the vandal I was chasing this morning, however, he/she was roving through a variety of IPs in that subnet. +i have a Disagreement about the reliability of a source +It was meant to be the former. Disguised as the latter, to keep up my rep. +There are reports of this phenomenon but the problem is reproducibility under control conditions. Such information is included in the re-write with the appropriate reference. +A small mystery for you to sort out Hi Susan/Sluggy/Sleuthy: Hope you're well. Regards, +BTW, I think this should say something about that. +" Proposed merge with The Wedding Ringer (2015 film) The two were redirected to the Screen Gems page until production had start, since they are the same page and no need for the ""2015 film"" with it, I suggest they be merged for the film page and not the redirect • talk " +" There are articles on the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland which should be taken into account in any reorganisation. Exactly what purpose they serve is unclear; most of the material is regurgitated from elsewhere and what isn't is more than likely wrong anyway. The Scotland one was created ""because there's one on England"", hardly a good reason. The generally shambolic nature of the Irish material can't be overstated: Kings of Tara, King of Ireland, High King of Ireland, Irish kings and List of High Kings of Ireland need revising and magimixing; a large part of the material is List of legendary kings of Britain-esque and in no sense historical. I haven't looked at the Welsh material and how, if at all, it corresponds. Finally, I suggest that the British Isles thing needs to go, Britain and Ireland would be less likely to offend anyone's sensibilities. (Talk) " +" I have done dozens of useful edits on Etty, including a few just today. You seem to be completely oblivious to WP:Good faith. I did an edit awhile back on another of your articles (moved a picture as I recall) and got a similar rude summary comment from you. Not more than 10 minutes later, a total stranger emailed me to apologize for your rudeness. The person said ""It's only Wikipedia, just ignore it"". I only try to help articles, never to damage them. It would be nicer if you simply changed edits that you don't like rather than do a vicious reversion with a snide remark. " +I posted this article even though (or because) I don't have the time to find out even basic facts like his religious denomination, or whether the D.D. was honorary or he completed a course at some seminary. I hope some music scholar can fill in the blanks. +I did not double vote in any AfD or elsewhere. Of course this is not allowed. +Vandalism Your edits at List of cruelty to animal incidents in Canada. It is against the rules at Wikipedia to alter an article when it is being discussed for deletion. In addition, vandalism is not condoned. +Quit harrassing my talk page Wikipedia is not a medium for harrassment. If you don't like to be reprimanded for saying stupid things, then don't say them to someone who isn't willing to put up with it. I have every right to use and build upon Wikipedia as any other peaceful user. This is your last warning. +" Yo. What in heaven's name is your problem with Rm994? He's just trying to explain to you how to properly edit a page on WP. Instead, you practically ""spit"" in the guy's face. So, in response to your actions, I will ""spit"" in your face and then you can tell me how it feels afterwards because you deserve it you motherfucker!!!! DO NOT BUG Rm994 EVER AGAIN, YOU HEAR ME YOU SOB? HabsMTL" +He may by typical - we have heroes shouting 'Shazam', pounding their canes on the floor, and all sorts of weird plot devices (two thirds of which involve the bad guy attempting to steal the special item). Definitions and Captain Power I was going to suggest adding Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future, but from several comments I see we have an issue as to definitions. Take John Carter - he's only a normal human, but on Mars with its lighter gravity, he's a super hero. The Kree from the Marvel comics are the same. Then there's equipment - if Ironman is a superhero, so is Captain Power. But is Captain Power really a superhero? Conan of course isn't a superhero. He's a very talented killer, but that's all. So what really is a superhero? +" Hi Will. Yes, that was me. I removed your link because in my opinion it didn't belong in the article. See WP:EL. Your removal of the Play Network link is fine with me.  Yintan  " +"-skinned prick named OlYeller got me banned. He doesn't like it when people point out that he broke his promise: ""finding 2+ news articles from reliable and independent sources would shut me up. If you do that, I'll make the text say annual myself."" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day&diff;=prev&oldid;=425928499 You're a lying piece of shit, OlYeller." +Looks good, thank you for the updates. +I'm not. I think the article, as it stood, omitted more than a few salient facts. You're pleading brevity over accuracy now. +REDIRECT Talk:Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power plant +A spade is a spade; don't get your panties in a twisted bunch, or bees in your bonnet over it. +Thank you thank you for everything you've done so far and take care +" Because back in September (which is when I think I made it), for some reason I found myself needing to go to your pages multiple times, and I simply got tired of typing in ""Avriette"" and then hitting myself when I realized I forgot the ""User:"" prefix. (talk) Contribs " +Are you gonna run and call mommy? Anal boy? +"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!  (talk) " +WHY??? he is FRENCH so it shud b a francofone title. pretty obvious. +Tirade ? It is accurate information based on fact. How does it feel to be leading a 'movement' that involves one other person ? Another wiki editor who is your webmaster on TechCa Kolzene.( ) +It makes sense. Thanks. +" July 2006 (UTC) The Oxford English Dictionary that I checked, uses ""voivode"". Do you have a similar outside reference that uses ""voivod""? 00:00, 18" +On a side note this again is yet another antique quinolone (noroxin aka norfloxacin) first approved by the FDA in 1986, and like ciprofloxacin there is no data on the FDA site for this drug between 1986 and 1994. And the NDA is not available. So there is going to be very little to work with when it comes to updating the article. I would be shocked if this was still in use, let alone considered to be a commonly prescribed quinolone, here in the States. +copyright speedy deletion +"@, your interpretation of the above term is a perfect example of what I stated previously about only a decided court case can be referenced regarding the interpretation of legal terms: I do not agree with your interpretation: thus, only an Indonesian court can decide the matter at hand - in the Indonesian case. Even a specific law is not the final say: only the interpretation of the courts of the stated law is the final say. Thus only decided court cases can be referenced. I agree with Chillum that it is better to avoid using the term ""illegal"" altogether. " +Blatant violation of Rule 5. For every sin you must be punished. +Latest attempt to delegitimize Arutz Sheva Since the 'nom' failed to note the discussion here, I am. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Arutz Sheva +Heil Hitler White Power God Is A Bitch Pussy=Tasty +Also the source says its Dahra-kafak hamra. Thats not the same thing as kafr hamra. Notice how there is a k at the end, combined with dahra. +" It's not complicated at all: He uses an alias, much like ""Johnny Squeaky"". Moxi Marlenspoke is not his real name. It's just that simple. =//= " +I came here looking for a quick survey of the scholarly response to this Documentary. It baffles me that one might suggest (as has been suggested above) that this is not the place for such information. +Hey Idk who Mrmike is and okay I'll stop editing hip hop pages, who are you by the way sr.? if you don't mine me asking +"== monobook == I tried to add your nice monobook, but it doesnt seem to work as when I go to a page with admins it does not highlight them, as it says ""Highligts all administrators on talk pages in cyan "". This is probably just me, but I did copy it straight . Can you please have a look? I'll add that I find your 500 edits to Anabolic steroid‎ quite impresive! Yes you did. Try holding ""Shift"" and pressing reload to clear your cache. (talk) Tick. Thanks! The only thing I find annoying is to click that tab to find discussion and to edit discussion you have to go back to that tab. But I'll give it a test for a bit. Disambig Can you advise me on how to set up a disambiguation for O&W; to sort Ollech & Wajs from New York, Ontario and Western Railway? Thanks. - Thanks for making those fixes, and the info. - Deletion review You recently commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse, which was closed as delete. The article has been nominated for a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 October 5#Psychiatric abuse. Please feel free to comment on the decision there - as a contributor to the original AfD, your input would be welcomed. Please comment Your input would be appreciated: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Martinphi " +" You can't debate this without reading it. Here it is. (begin) Unholy alliance An unholy alliance is a coalition among seemingly antagonistic groups, especially if one is religious, for ad hoc or hidden gain. Like patronage, unholy alliances are not necessarily illegal, but unlike patronage, by its deceptive nature and often great financial resources, an unholy alliance can be much more dangerous to the public interest. An early, well-known use of the term was by Theodore Roosevelt (TR): TAB ""To destroy this invisible Government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day."" - 1912 Progressive Party Platform, attributed to TRO'Toole, Patricia, ""The War of 1912,"" TIME in Partneship with CNN, Jun. 25, 2006. and quoted again in his autobiographyRoosevelt, Theodore. An Autobiography: XV. The Peace of Righteousness, Appendix B, NEW YORK: MACMILLAN, 1913. where he connects Trusts and monopolies (sugar interests, Standard Oil, etc.) to Woodrow Wilson, Howard Taft, and consequently both major political parties. TAB After the breakup of Standard Oil, TR lost the election, and the unholy alliance he had identified, oligopolies of a few big commodities corporations and their political allies, continued otherwise undeterred by the mutually beneficial indifference of both major political parties. In 1935, retired Marine Major General Smedley Butler described how this unholy alliance influenced U.S. foreign policy and how his job abroad had been to be a ""muscle man for big business."" In 1944, conservative journalist John T. Flynn described how this unholy alliance uses religion to sell its agenda abroad to the American public: TAB ""The enemy aggressor is always pursuing a course of larceny, murder, rapine and barbarism. We are always moving forward with high mission, a destiny imposed by the Deity to regenerate our victims while incidentally capturing their markets, to civilise savage and senile and paranoid peoples while blundering accidentally into their oil wells.""Flynn, John T. (1944) As We Go Marching. p. 240 TAB A reference to this unholy alliance today is: TAB Unholy Alliance, a review by PBS journalist, Rev. Dr. Allen Dwight Callahan of TAB Phillips, Kevin (2006) American Theocracy: The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21st Century, Viking Press. TAB Other unholy alliances are the subjects of other books: TAB Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left, by David Horowitz TAB Unholy Alliance, by David Yallop, about the international drug trade and resultant political corruption TAB Unholy alliance: religion and atrocity in our time, by Marc H. Ellis TAB Unholy Alliance: A History of Nazi Involvement With the Occult, by Peter Levenda TAB Still other unholy alliances are found in ""Bootleggers and Baptists""Bruce Yandle, ""Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist."" Regulation 7, no. 3 (1983): 12. and Dixie Mafia. (end)" +" Ok, I see where you are coming from now. Wikipedia does not promote fairness. Ok, I can deal with that. Here is what I am saying. If it weren't for the unreliable accusations of the SPLC and the ADL, there would again be a question whether or not this topic was WP:FRINGE!! You see, statements such as ""common citizens can gain access to these funds"" assumes 1) Purveyors of the Redemption Movement have all agreed somehow that these funds exist (who said that besides the SPLC? Anyone?) and that a safe assumption would be 'all purveyors of the redemption movement are at some time preoccupied with extracting these funds. 2) Purveyors of the Redemption Movement all agree in the existence of a 'common citizen', (what is a common citizen according to the Redemption Movement? Uuuuh.. Ummmm... Uuuuu...) 3) Purveyors of the Redemption Movement agree that only a 'common citizen' can gain access to these funds ........... These are all assumptions that have been molded into the supposed history of the supposed Redemptionist, if you will. Nonsense! Perhaps an account of the Redemption Movement, as told by someone claiming to be a part of the Redemption Movement would suffice. Do you see the many problems with introducing the article with these SPLC statements? " +Vandalism Claim What are personal attacks? I said that it was an anti-fan anyway. Isn't it you that began vandalism? Wiki is the place where you should write a fact precisely, not your agreement or objection. +" You are missing the point. The phrase you quote is in a summary of other scholars' arguments. When summarizing the view of a sub-group we are not supposed to render our opinion on whether their arguments are valid. Nor do we decide whether to include their views on the basis of whether their views are consistent with wikipedia editorial policy. If a substantial minority of scholars argued that Julius Caesar's astrological chart ought to be considered historical evidence, it would be incumbent upon wikipedia to report that in the relevant article. An absurd example, but I hope it illustrates how you are missing the point. Furthermore, as for the scholars' argument itself, they are not arguing against ""methodological naturalism"" or history as an ""empirical science."" In fact, many evangelicals offer mounds of evidence (convincing or otherwise) for their views (including single authorship of Isaiah) that adhere to methodological naturalism and empirical science. See Kenneth Kitchen's On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 2003) for the most significant example. Rather, by ""outmoded modernist presuppositions,"" evangelicals typically refer to practices and assumptions of source critics that are even now recognized as obsolete by secular scholars. For instance, the assumptions held by former adherents of the documentary hypothesis are now rejected, leading to Neo-Documentary Hypothesis proponents (e.g., Jeffery Stackert at University of Chicago) that rely less on such outdated methods and assumptions. 70.131.155.15 In other words, nothing I wrote was intentionally biased. Rather, it was intended to remove bias and to update the article to reflect the true situation in the academy." +BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOL I AM NOT A VANDAL THIS IS NOT A MACRO YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SPARTUCUSED BOOTSTOOTS IS A FRIGGEN GAYFAG LOLOOOLBOOTSTOOTS I +":""Please tag your ID's""? Excuse me? As you might guess, the people writing here may have been at the NUS and therefore experienced it and thus claim certain aspects of this wikipedia entry as 'propaganda'. Do you think anyone would want to have an ID tag with such an 'accusation' in place? - I think not, especially as it is so obvious that the biased POV provided in this article reflects the interest of the NUS itself and it is up to the reader to assume who added this sort of content. - I am very dissatisfied with the level of quality in this article - very misrepresenting. (sorry, I am not going to name details out of privacy concerns, others have done that already) " +I ask: Are we a Nazi society? Why are people not allowed to speak their minds, here? If someone gets hurt, then let them! It is their own fault, that they take offense. I support freedom of speech; if I want to call someone a bastard, I should be allowed. In the same respects, others might call me one, or something else. I can let live the policies for how to edit the articles, but for the communication policies, I do not accept. +Section titled ==Journeyperson== Actually, it was just that people came to relize that the term was sexist, there's no difference between the work of a journeyman & journeyperson. +Photo dropping++ Why is Joseph McCarthy's picture in this article at all??? He is not even referenced by the article, directly or indirectly. 167.176.16.8 +" Nice job on autism causes page Common sense award I think what is on the causes of autism page is well done. I also like your common sense approach. I am not really sure how to send you a message on content but thought I would try this. I see the vitamin D deficiency hypothesis which should be there because it is in the literature, but the hypothesis does not make any sense because oral supplementation of vitmain D among the very young has increased dramatically over the last 20 years and autism increases with it. An alternative cause of the epidemic is the opposite: too much vitamin D supplementation and fortification among the very young, which makes a lot of sense considering the calcium channel nature of many autism syndromes, the biochemistry of those with autism, and the epidemic. I have a book about it on amazon and some academics have told me the ideas in it are provacative. Does something need significant media exposure before it can appear in wikipedia? As you seem to know a lot about autism causes would you have any interest in reviewing it? I could send you a .pdf copy. Hi, . I appreciate your kind words, but causes of autism in fact, most of our autism articles was mostly written by now-departed ; it would need to be a high-quality journal because autism is a featured article, and it would need to be an independent secondary review per our medical sourcing guidelines. In otherwords, there is no need for me to review your book; your work and theory would need to be covered by an independent high-quality journal review of the causes of autism. (Talk) " +Deletion review takes too long, and since it's no longer being actively edited and the original deletion was in bad faith, I'd rather just be bold and restore it. I'm also working on gathering some real world notability stuff to solve its problems. 68.228.105.90 +I give you facts and you spew politics. I don't have to stand for that. You are being stupid. Stupidity destroys +Hi Jossi, question on BLP in the context of WP:NOT#NEWS, etc. Jossi, I agreed strongly with your original assessment of this situation and your interpretation of WP:NOT#NEWS in the context of WP:BLP, but when I cited your interpretation after discovering that the BLP had been created solely to report the news, I was shouted down at the BLP noticeboard. When you get back, I wonder if you could take a look at the case I brought at the BLP noticeboard and comment there, or leave a message on my talk page. I really am genuinely curious about the idea that an editor sitting around reading the local county paper one day (established by the editor's admission), might see that charges have been filed against an otherwise not-notable-enough-for-an-article living person, and create a Wikipedia BLP to report the news. As WP:BLP appears to me to be among the strictest and most critical of Wikipedia's policies...I really want to understand the seeming disagreement between (a) my interpretation, (b) what I took to be your interpretation, when compared to (c) the outcome of the discussion there. Thanks... +Iceland I can add my opinion to any talk pages. I have the right to express my opinion so don't remove my comments again or im gonna come to ur house with a baseball bat and make sure u never have kids. +":Thanks for the opinion. I agree. By the way, were there flashing red lights and pop-up banners saying ""nyah-nyah, you can't edit!""? (talk) 15:00, July 23, 2005 (UTC) " +" No, the song is ""Peter Cottontail"" - by Steve Nelson & Jack Rollins, set to Gregorian Chant, with some Latin words and Latinized balderdash." +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  you have recently written may not meet Wikipedia's generally accepted criteria for inclusion of biographies. It has likely been marked for deletion. Don't worry, there are several other options: Create an entry for yourself on one of the many social networking websites. Many ISPs allow you to create your own website, often at no extra charge. With the above options your biography will be protected from being edited by others, unlike a Wikipedia article. You may create a wiki at EditThis.info or one of the other wiki farms. If you are attempting to make an entry for genealogical purposes, you may find WikiTree.org a useful site (but please do not simply copy material to Wikitree unless you are the original author - their license terms are different from Wikipedia's). If you are, or intend to become, a regular Wikipedia contributor, please use your user page (user:) to post biographical information about yourself. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia! Please feel free to delete this notice once the issue has been corrected. " +"::::::::Now, surely you aren't suggesting plagiarism? If one is to avoid plagiarism, one must rephrase the information in the source in their own words, and in doing so, must invariably inject their own POV into it. I'm not saying this is what I consider acceptable, I'm saying this is a fact of life. To quote Jacob Bronowski: ""One aim of the physical sciences has been to give an exact picture of the material world. One achievement of physics in the twentieth century has been to prove that that aim is unattainable. The world is not a fixed, solid array of objects, out there, for it cannot be fully separated from out perception of it. There is no absolute knowledge. And those who claim it, whether they are scientists or dogmatists open the door to tragedy. All information is imperfect. We have to treat it with humility. That is the human condition.” J Bronowski – The Ascent of Man " +" I would ""assume good faith"" is the wikicops would do the same otherwise it is a god damn zoo here trying to get even legitimate edits made and honestly no one but a giant nerd would want to go through the trouble." +Environmental Record Task Force Hi Eastlaw,Please come by and check us out when you get back from your wikibreak! We could really use someone with some corporate law knowledge, since the records we're dealing with are frequently US DOJ settlements... GL on exams, +I would say it is not notable because we cannot find any article or book that is exclusively about this subject. +" Oxymoronic label? The British Isles talkpage is not a forum for a ""general discussion of British Isles.""!! - says the latest box above. So what is it for; discussing the weather? The notion that the talkpage isn't about discussing the article must make this a fairly unique place on Wiki! ( )" +" Yeah, you've got a bit of a point there. We can't be sure of the turnover rate. Still, that's often the case on Wikipedia. We use the most recent sources, till something comes along to the contrary. Part of the whole ""verifiability, not absolute truth"" thing. And I think you're underestimating the importance of these jobs. The seamstress makes all the costumes you see, the lighting technician makes the entrances look cool, catering keeps the wrestlers alive. Compare that to a creative consultant, part-time ""producer"" or member of the board. When have you ever noticed something they did? Or, less importantly, all the ""unassigned personnel"". Sitting at home is notable? (talk) 16:40, February 11, 2014 (UTC)" +" Unauthorised change On 26 January 2014 (i.e. just in the last few weeks), User:Mzilikazi1939 changed this article from the standard form of writing dates in the English language to CE/BCE. As he well knows, this violates WP:MOS, specifically WP:ERA, which requires that any change to an article's date style first be discussed on the talk page and justified with article-specific reasons before consensus is established and the article is then ready to be changed. As is clearly evident to everyone, none of these steps have taken place in this case. Instead, in the two and fro of the last few weeks as Aesop has gone back and forth between the Queen's English and CE/BCE, Mzilikazi and his friends have claimed that the comments much further up this talk page and dated 20 months ago constitute the necessary discussion and consensus for the change of 26/01/14. Apart from the obvious fact that the article remained in the standard English state for 20 months continuously (May 2012 to January 2014), those comments were never enough to justify the change to CE/BCE even back then. This is of course because, as mentioned earlier, WP:ERA requires that article-specific reasons be given and consensus established. Neither occured then. What we see from 2012 can at best be called a disgrace; it was merely Dougweller and his friends making the laughably fallacious and tendentious claim that because there were more of them, they should automatically get their way without having to justify their case or convince anyone of it. The ""discussion"" went quiet in its unresolved state and the change from the Queen's English (which the article has used since its creation and the overwhelming majority of the time since then) to CE/BCE therefore didn't proceed, at least until 20 months later when Mzilikazi decided to try again, this time without any attempt to follow the proper procedure. If Mzilikazi and his friends want to legitimately change Aesop from the established English language abbreviations to CE/BCE then by all means discuss it here and follow the proper process. Stop trying to ram through your illegal change with constant back and forth editing. ( )" +Sure, that couldn't hurt. I've actually tested it on Mac/Firefox and Mac/Safari (albeit an earlier version of Firefox) and it's worked for me. So I think it's less likely a straight-up browser/OS issue, and more likely an interaction with either the monobook.js or perhaps another piece of Javascript code that may be running on your client. But that's just a guess. If it behaves differently for you with Safari, please let me know. '''''' Talk +Koala claims that there are no legitimate descendants of the Hohenstaufen, which is a different thing than saying that legitimate male line is extinct. And in this very case, it is incorrect to allege that legitimate descents via women are nonexistent, while legitimate male line descent truly is extinct. They are not the same thing, as those of us who know genealogy, are well aware. I observe that the Yopie has chosen to join the same falsehood. I think Yopie and Koala need to cease their falsehoods and stop those edits of theirs. I understand Yopie is not fluent enough in English (being obviously a foreigner, from Czechia). Those 'warnings' Yopie distributes here and there, are manifestly unwarranted, and rather a signal of twisted tactics in Wikipedia conduct than anything constructive. For example, Yopie sometimes alleges vandalism in clear cases of non-vandalism. Yopie's such behavior should and may lead to him getting sanctioned. as to Yopie's quibbling using unrelated claims, I suppose he means to say that all female-line descents from all dukes of Anjou are illegitimate. But of course those who know genealogy and titles, are aware that strictly speaking, neither of those peinces actually are 'princes' of Anjou, they would themselves be first to admit that their claim is to the title of duke of that. While Louis' daughter may well be known as princess of Anjou, if they so wish. +" That's a lie! You're guilty of sophistry and manipulation. Oh, You are a clever one, aren't you. I read what you edited. I saw what you didwhat you added, what you deletedI don't how you did it, but we both know WHAT you didand you continue to do it! With the full weight of your title and insider access as an ""administrator."" I'm not an expert at Wikioh, excuuuuse meI mean ""Wikipedia."" And why, for the love of God, do all of you continue to refuse to address my issue regarding the concensus that was reached long ago; namely, that the ARTICLE WAS FUCKING FINE UNTIL YOU DECIDED YOU WE WERE NOT AS BRILLIANT AS YOU? GO FUCK YOURSELF...I'M DONE...GEE, WHAT A LIFE YOU HAVE! WIKIPEDIA...NO PAY, NO GLORY. AND THE BUTT OF JOKES FROM JAY LENO AND DAVID LETTERMAN. OH, AND BY THE WAY....You should remove the photo of Peg from the article, for, as your puckerd asshole will see, it was contributed by mefrom MY ORIGINAL research. You are a fucking a liar and a hypocrite, Gwen. You have no true alligenmce to Wikipedia....you belong to a hateful, politcal band of cultish fanatics within...me, I'm just a fucking Iraq War Vet who tried to help make Wikipedia honest.... You changed the history to reflect your ""rightness"" and calmly sit back and wait for the maniac to vent. Well, there ya go, Miss Cunt..you got what you wanted. GO FUCK YOURSELF. (Oh, know, gee, I guess I won't be able to edit for Wikipedia anymore after that tirade) WHO FUCKING CARES. WHAT THE FUCK GOOD DID IT DO ME? IF YOU HAD ONE FUCKING OUNCE OF INTEGRITY, YOU WOULD COMPARE THE VERY ORIGINAL ARTICLE WITH MY CONTRIBUTIONS...Peg Entwistle's Wikipedia looked like a fucking GOD DAMNED article from WEEKLY WORLD NEWS. " +Incorrect. Check the diff again. +" You violate policy by refusing to compromise. Antman chat " +angry sumo wrestlers. +" Survey Strong oppose as we speak not only about rulers of Poland, like Sigismund I he was a ruler of Lithuania. I see no sense why ""of Poland"" should be put forward in the name. Similar proposals were put in front few years ago I think, and feeling was that putting just ""Poland"" is not desirable. Nothing changed I think, " +" Re:Advice needed I think posting on WP:ANI is a good way to bring attention to what's happening. At this point I don't know if there's really anything else to do, unless the same user shows up again. And even if s/he does, there are a lot of other users (including admins) who are aware of the situation and will spring into action. I don't think you have to worry about ""clearing your name"" since everything is documented. ... talk " +Unblock request +TAB Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: −TAB +Limited support under Android 1.9 / 2.2 native browser(s)? I'm seeing some limitations in what SVG content will render properly under the default browser (or alternative browsers) running on Android 1.9. I believe this is also true for Android 2.2. The SVG wikipedia page doesn't provide any insight regarding Android support for SVG. Can anyone confirm what support there is for SVG under the Android browser(s), and update the Wikipedia content accordingly? Thanks, Paul. +" Because the reviewer is stupid is not the reason to leave it out. I removed it because of Wikipedia's undue weight policy. While there are numerous people who dismiss Halo 3 as Halo 2.5, in terms of real, published reviews, the view is distinctly in the minority so far. If we start seeing three or four other reviews like that one (or, if someone finds them already out there) we'll be sure to add it back in (albeit not with a vanity paragraph for one single reviewer.) (talk) " +Hi there I don't think our paths have crossed, but my friend said you had a recent blog post that touched on the best way to move toward local chapters of the WMF. But, we couldn't find it. Can you shed any light on this? Thanks! - +Please stop making your own judgements about stubs. Removing stub tages from articles at will is not encouraged.Thank you. +" TK, sorry to hear about the problems with your vision. But I hope the surgery and recovery both go well, and that you're feeling great and back up to full capacity again soon! Best wishes and warmest regards! • Bug • " +" About Korean language Hi Chink, Well. it's well known that Wikiepdia is contaminated by many Chinese propagandists who spread lies. Chinese hate the term of Altaic since they has been conquered by Altaic people throughout history. Most of all, they want to cut any relation between Manchu and Korean as it's shown in their very political attempts in Northeast Project of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. They have good many reasons to make Korean as language isolate. Anyway stepping off this kind of their political attempts. The notion that ""Most classify it as a language isolate while a few consider it to be in the Altaic language family"" is wrong, no it's a fake. There are two references that chinks insists they support the notion, but there's no such phrases in the references. Have you ever checked the reference? Or are you suffering from dyslexia? Where in the reference, Song, Jae Jung (2005) ""The Korean language: structure, use and context"" Routledge, p. 15, can you find a phrase that make you tell ""Most classify it as a language isolate""? and the same with "" a few consider it to be in the Altaic language family?"" As in the reference, Song, Jae Jung (2005) ""The Korean language: structure, use and context"" Routledge, p. 15, the author says ""While controvesial, Korean as Altaic is more accpeted as any other views"". And ""they are many who see it a language isolate"". So where's a remark that ""most"" classify it as a language isolate? My dear chinky propagandist?" +" I really don't see the logic of that; I'd already created a redirect (and why would I be likely to remove it?), so why would it be in any way preferable to ""canonicalise"" the version that doesn't follow the name of the article, and the category? And since when did this become 'normal'? " +Photos of Trayvon Martin should be replaced with Pics from 7-11 which is what he looked like shortly before death == The pictures of Trayvon Martin shown in the article do not reflect what shooter Zimmerman saw before his confrontation. Pictures from the convenience store where Trayvon Martin is seen buying things should be added to this article. The currently shown pictures are of a younger version of deceased Martin and may bias readers in their analysis of the events. +" Please specifically name the ""officials"" you are describing by individual name? Are you from a Soviet country? Wikipedia is NOT Putin´s Russia!! " +No problem at all. +Robert Perloff Thanks for the note. I hope you'll vote to keep. Seems as if some stubsorter is a little trigger-happy with the vanity tag. PS: like the shirt! +", 5 April 2009 (UTC) If he was born and raised in Australia, but of French ethnic background, any reports would still describe him as an Australian. The majority of sources stated him as a Vietnamese immigrant, because his (former) nationality comes before his families ancestry. Such opinion also varies, many Hoa are considered to be Vietnamese American as well, it just depends on what ""person"" it is. 21:09" +I apologize for my own misunderstanding. I should have read your page more carefully. +PS - I probably should add that I am not the above individual you have been attempting to prevent from vandalizing Wikipedia. This IP is at a college, so there are many students, faculty, etc all under the same IP address. +That 14yr old asked for it when he made it his agenda to victimise anonymous users of wikipedia. +I noticed it due to the RSN. You made a comment about sourcing, I took a look at your recent contribs to get some context about where and how the sources you asked about were being used. When asking about 2 low quality porn refs, an action you took regarding a 3rd low quality porn ref is perfectly on topic, because similar actions might be undertaken about the other two. +He never was abroad...and he speaks only english +- Bibliography Link is not found. +huh? Never seen such action/judgement. If you disagree or want to comment, you can do so directly. - +The area of between f(y) and Y-axis ∫x dy=∫dy =(−by) =(−)−b(n−m) =(n2−m2)−b(n−m) +"Further Recherche == Boris Beresowski http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Abramowitsch_Beresowski http://www.taz.de/pt/2003/05/10/a0276.1/text http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Berezovsky who founded a party with two other people, Sergej Juschenkow and Wladimir Golowljow, and who was a voter pro Putin-vote-contrahent Iwan Rybkin in 2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Rybkin http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iwan_Petrowitsch_Rybkin had to realize, that both other party founders Sergej Juschenkow and Wladimir Golowljow were murdered, by the Kreml or by Beresowsky himself? Boris Beresowski was a TV-Manager, so he choosed the slow public death of Alexander Litvinenko to destroy the image of Putin? http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,450713,00.html Though, Alexander Litvinenko was doing a recherche to the death aof Anna Politkovskaja. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Stepanowna_Politkowskaja http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Politkovskaya The recherche has to find out now, if Boris Beresowski has a contamination of Polonium 210, or - which forces within russia do not want a modern Kremel with - and of course why Anna Politkovskaja was murdered by the Kremel. Too many death peaople: Alexander Litvinenko, Sergej Juschenkow and Wladimir Golowljow, and Anna Politkovskaja. If Boris Berezovsky would die as well, Vladimir Putin would be in hard conflicts. As Ivan Rybkin is a founder of the conservative party http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_the_Russian_Federation http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kommunistische_Partei_der_Russischen_Föderation and a good Friend of Boris Beresowski, both contrahents of Putin, the motives of the death of Alexander Litvinenko maybe found in the relationsships of Ivan Rybkin to the Russian federation. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicherheitsrat_der_Russischen_Föderation Secretary of the federation is: 2001 - 2004 Wladimir Ruschailo, he has to be asked as well towards the topics, because his period ended as well with the beginning of putin. Ivan Rybkin was the security-secretary of the russian federation and as well special-secretary for the Tschetschenien-war. He was called ""Mr. Consens"" so he made peace with them in a mute way - the opposite of Putin: a loud war. And this was as well the topic of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko: the war against Tschetschenien, which should be strategic product of ""burning the house down""-Putin, in their eyes. So the real focus is the nowerdays work of Ivan Rybkin. == " +" admin Hi, I was just perusing my talk page recollecting the exchange we had a long time ago when I remembered you were keen on becoming an Administrator. It's been a while, but may I just say well done with your successful RfA. Regards, WilliamH (talk) Thanks! Hope things are going well by you as well. Cheers! - " +Clark County, Arkansas You reverted my edit of this article without any justification or comment. If you have any justification for labelling lynchings as 'common' in Clark County, Arkansas, please make it known. I am quite willing to be corrected if my edit is in error. Until then, I'm reverting. +Yobot flaw Your bot has a defect in it. It recently edited Howling Bells for the purpose of updating the infobox, but it also made additional edits throughout the article, which has now wrecked half of the references. It de-italicized the work parameter in all {{Cite web}} citations, consequently italicizing all work. (meow) +There was nothing wrong with the previous information and sources before your edits. There is no value in replacing current data with old data, so please don't do that. — +" Sorry I've e-mailed you, OM. " +" Flags in ship infobox FYI: specifies that the ""flag"" and ""Ship country"" and ""Ship flag"" fields are for military vessels, not commercial ships. For commercial ships, the project standard is to place the flag in the ""Ship registry"" field. - (talk • contribs) - " +" Comunist ""Agents"" acting as wikipidia moderators are in fact glorifying comunism. I am astonished at the deep diarrhoea of Communism propaganda on articles such as this one on Fidel Castro. This criminal murderous communist (let us understand that no one is a communist only a fool can be a communist). This murderer is being glorified here in this space of wikipedia. Let us (at least me), we the ones that don't have the power of moderators, let us uphold reason and above all truth of facts and reality, that this pig by the name of Fidel Castro is not only a communist criminal but is a devil in its own right. For the crimes that this pig committed and the misery that this pig inflicted in nations and peoples, may the soul of Fidel Castro burn in hell for eternity. Rui Gabirro, 100% Anti Communist gabirro@gmail.com" +The 3RR and you I responded to your comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. In case you're not watching that page, i didn't want you to miss it. ·o< +Troll attack Can you please help defend me against the trolls? They're in Full Attack mode. +" Your edit seems fair enough to me. As an aside, taking offense at people making a reversion, and then giving up is rather unworkable on wikipedia. Don't take it personally, gain consensus on the talk page, and sensible edits tend to stay. I expect this page is on the watchlist of several WPMILHIST members who would be pleased and supportive of an overhaul. ( @) " +" Hello, I had been looking forward to hearing from you, thank-you for stopping by my Talk page. I left a response for you there. (talk) " +You're pretty quick there Taggy. I'm glad people like you are looking out for readers. I'll add a source in just a moment. I'm looking for instructions on how to do it. YOU Hey. I'm sorry if I was a bit rude. I had a rough day and I came to Wikipedia for some peace and quiet— when I see something wrong I just can't wait to fix it! I care about this project that much. I'll try and be friendlier next time. I know how important it is to be civil, and I'm working on it. I hope you stay around. This link might help you out: Help:Introduction to referencing I'm so pleased with you both. Now, carry on, we have an encyclopedia to write ;) +December 2009 Please keep in mind that if you're going to randomly categorize movies as American films in the external links, please pay attention to the films country of origin in the articles you wish to alter. Most of the articles you edited were on films that weren't even American. +a major sports player +cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay UTC) cody is gay +}} Page move I moved the page from Ballast water discharge and the environment since it was only about the US (and it was tagged with ). (talk) - +" DEAR Anonymous EE Guy, Well, I don't know if you really mean to give a full picture of the case, but we could include this one: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/reich1.htm http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/ Who are the web site of Jean-Pierre Voyer, a kind of model person for mister Messager/YBM, and who spred a quiet special form for ideologie, which goal is to play with words and how to defend and argue about things who do not exist, how to play with words and ""fuck others"" as phrased on his web site, and essentialy, how to display a superior attitude in order to effectively use the communication on internet to their full interest, by using the circumstances frame of the dialogues. This include displaying lies as being facts with such a forcefullness as to convince others. It is called: postsituationnisme, ideologie who is followed by YBM, together with a sympathie to the 3rd reich, and a, by some, called pseudo-Hégelianism. YBM run his forum where he defend the man and his positions, with as much furore as he dispells those of Igor and Grichka Bogdanov. You will found in it concepts as the Superior Race, versus the inferior race, and different creativs ways to talk the technics and language of publicity into a way of ""mass communication"" and a weapon to convince anyone of anything. I am sure that this angle will bring a certain shade of light where it was upmost needed, and will constitute the missing piece of the puzzle. I hope you will excuse my very late assertion or révélation about this subject, but I was myself only made aware of it for a very short time ago, together with the fact that this Voyer and YBM have harrassed people before, writers too, for books who had nothing to do with science, but nevertheless constituted those 2 mens lifes mening for 2 years. Actually they stopped with their first victims at the end of 2002, beginning of 2003, to consacrate their cherish technics of manipulating the masses, and ideologies of diffamation on 2 other subjects, Igor and Grichka Bogdanov. No need to say that the 2 former victims are still paying for the vices of Voyer and Messager, and that their lifes and career have been destroyed. Why so much hate against people they didn't knew and had never met? They were only practicing, like serial killers start somewhere, in the shadow, and are only known for much more exposed actions. Here are some other links who do compleete the picture: The first attacks of Voyer and YBM against XAVIER, the writer: http://aeamh.free.fr/x/agent.html http://aeamh.free.fr/blockhaus/ http://aeamh.free/bk/index.html YBM Web site: http://aeamh.free.fr Site Voyer: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/reich1.htm http://perso.wanadoo.fr/leuven/ I consider this information for being central in the matter at hand, as all accusations will have fallen and nothing much will have come from the original and following J. Baez paper on the subject if it hadn't been for Messager and Voyers' questionnable work in the name of very questionnable motives, all accomplished to serve a completely useless ideology. I think that this will teach us all a lesson regarding objectivity and our hability to evaluate a given problem properly, and to be able to use our sense of sceptisisme ans sound judgement. On a more general way and even more central here, our power to distinguish between agreeing to a given opinion based on facts, and being manipulate in doing so for all the wrong reasons. This information compleete the picture and gave it its true mening, even if it is by showing how meningsless a huge part of this affair was. Sophie XAL " +" Your user page How did you do that with your user page so vandels will have problems! I must know! This is ingenious play " +" I am the ""sockpuppet"" that that idiot akradecki keeps thinking he see behind every bush and I can assure you that I had nothing to do with this. I have been watching asskrack, billcj and bzuk for a while now and everytime they see something they don;t like or cannot handle they go ahead and delete it because they claim it's sock puppetry. All three of them are out fo control. Don;t expect any help from the admin John either. He backs asskrack up every time. " +Please, if you want to get a message to me, the fastest way is my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Deleting content from my user page (the one describing me) may be considered vandalism. You can create a user page for your account as well, at +Thanks for your comment, Theo. It's hard to keep a sense of civility in such a highly-charged environment, but I will try harder for the sake of Wikipedia. 28 June 2005 17:38 (UTC) +Images If you are going to upload images from NASA could you include the date and time in the filename? It is helpful when editors know this bit of information. +" Sham exposure It is important to note that the sham was also emitting RF radiation at a lower level, and that the reaction of participants to the sham exposure may also be related to EMFs I have no idea of the scientific consensus on this, but I've moved it from the article because of a) editorialising (""It is important to note"") and b) unreliable sourcing (it just dips into BMJ Rapid Responses, which is no more than an online letters page, to a post by a person of unknown credentials). " +" Questions regarding the section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenital_adrenal_hyperplasia#20th_and_21st_century Was the individual described here (Joseph Marzo) classified as 5 on the Prader scale? Did he develop breasts or was he too virilized? Did he menstruate since he had ""normal internal"" female organs? If so, how was this physically possible for him since he had a penis/pseudo-phallus? How was he able to live as a male his entire life?" +Stevan Castro Lives in Highland, Michigan, has a beard +Usage should prevail. It probably should be Sierpinski for all of these; but different fields may differ - and then there's the question of which editors we have. PMAnderson +" Yes, well, that's what's been happening. It's sad that information must be omitted until after an election, and until John Howard is no longer a political force. The government inquiries and historical reports about the plantations are another part that was deleted, presumably to be held back until after the election.'''''' " +You are really a stupid fuck if you dont even know your teams history Yilmaz Gokdel was a real Galatasarayli and he coached galatasaray in the seventies your list says Gokdel was never coach. thats not corret Gokdel was succeeded by Don Hawe !! that means that Gokdel started off as coach of the 74-75 he even won a Cup with Galatasaray Ataturk Cup +Weird comment The editor you responded to on the micronations project talk page is merely trolling. Best to ignore it. +" Hi Centrx, See the second sentence of the article: The Hebrew phrase Mihu Yehudi (""?מיהו יהודי"", ""Who is a Jew?"") came into widespread use when several high profile legal cases in Israel grappled with this subject after the founding of the Jewish state in 1948. Also see the talk archives, especially , , , and . " +under their new name +" The first paragraph of the article ends with: The term racialism is sometimes favored as a less negative term by those who hold certain beliefs about race that they believe to be scientifically justified. Two problems: The way this sentence is currently worded, it assumes the validity of the concept of race, when in fact that term is problematical because of the way most people interpret it. There is no clear indication of what believers in ""racialism"" believe other than that they believe their beliefs are scientifically justified. It's also unclear whether these believers are even a reasonably coherent group, or whether for some users of the terms it indicates a belief that, e.g., people with a recent African heritage are more likely, statistically, to have sickle-cell anemia and therefore need to be screened for that disease, and for others it is just a cosmetic improvement on ""racism."" 17:08, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)" +Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. +Michael Jackson is alive Just ask Elvis... +We only list permanent fleet assignments that lasts for a good portion of a decade or so. +" Introductory text The plot summary is lifted verbatim from the Paramount home video site. Can someone with a better understanding of the show please fix? '''''' " +You know nothing of the Japanese culture or people Uncle Ed. 220.253.22.120 +" She didn't achieve any world title but she became a big model and public person and more people heard of her than of Spektor. It's true you mentioned Kurnikova got replaced by Sharapova, but by saying that you brought up the point that Kurnikova was the one who was originally there, therefore should be the default while a consensus is achieved. I don't think Jews who consider themselves Russian American should be arbitrarily removed, but we also should avoid a situation where Jews are ""pushed"" into the image to make a point, the criteria should be notability and personal definition. Even though Bon Jovi is part Russian, I wouldn't suggest him in the collage for the reason I don't know if he actually considers himself one and ever spoke about it properly. Jews, just like Tatars, or any other ethnic group, should not be arbitrarily removed, that's 100% true. 2.124.21.47 " +Do you really think so? We've all known this since forever, you idiot. 24.226.23.56 +We're not going to do your homework for you. +== Hey fuck you you cocksucker I was talking to Daymee you fucking retard. +Found it Found the page. It's page 69 and it states that the Hall of Fame Ceremony will take place at Fox Theater on April 2, 2011. Now if it's still in the Newsstands or at a gas station, go get it and see if you can reason with the stubborn editors of the Fox Theater (Atlanta, Georgia) article. +please note the following: +blatant canvassing Melonbarmonster has been canvassing regarding the request for comment in a highly blatant manner. Asking for a wide range of opinions seems like a great idea, however his requests seem to be made only to those who are likely to share his opinion. +Unban this ip address or a new online encyclopedia will be formed that will kick wikipedia's ass. You have been warned TEEECCCCCTOOOONIIIIIIIICCCCCC SHHHHHIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT +LOL Codename Lisa, do you have some edit warring or tag teaming to do that you are worried I might disrupt? If not, there was no need for the CU request. However, if you do, I can easily come back. Best regards, +" You beat me to it! You beat me to deleting Women's sports people. In fact, looking at the deletion log, it looks like you deleted the rest of the prodded candidates in one fell swoop. Do you have a program for doing this? Otherwise, I'd really be impressed with your typing skills P . If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. (I'd normally add this to my previous message... but due to your Wikibreak, I'll just leave another note like this...) Wow! Quite impressed at the speed you conducted those deletions... anyways, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! No response is required. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Full listing of pages deleted in umbrella nominations Hi there. Would it be possible to have a full list of all the pages deleted as a result of the Esperanza MfD? Normally with umbrella nominations there is a record of all the pages deleted at the XfD page itself, but I don't think there was in this case. This case is complicated by the fact that several admins did the deletions. Trawling through the deletion log can also be a pain, unless you know of an easier way to do this. My RFA Hey, thanks for participating in my recent RFA. You were amongst a number of editors who remained neutral on the topic. The RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). I am extremely grateful that you took the time to advise me on to improve as a Wikipedian and I'd like to assure you that I'll do my level best to develop my skills here to a point where you may feel you could trust me with the mop. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller) Wikipedia:Esperanza on deletion review An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Esperanza. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. '''''''''' ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? A very Californian RfA thanks from Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of (97/4/4)! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words so, a very belated thank you for all of your kind words. I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of advice, this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, ""Yeah, was an admin."" Hopefully then they don't start talking about the explosive ArbComm case I got tied into and oh what a drama that was, but we'll see, won't we? Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback here or help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. Again, thank you. – Well! I thought about whether you'd like to be bothered reading this, whenever you got the chance, and figured it might give you something to feel good about. Thanks for the trust you put in me, way back when, as late as this note is. I hope you do well in your current term of duty, and find whatever enjoyment is available to you. Regards, [[User:Luna Santin|Luna +" Untitled by some emo cunt I see a block log in your account. Just seeing it make me laugh, Mr. Perfect, perfect no more. Get off my dick, cunt. In case you didn't notice, the block was after this. You really must be retared. It's a zero! I got blocked for 30 minutes, you got blocked for more than days. You is lost. And I don't even know who the fuck are you. It's a zero! You been cryin Tasc0? Bout time they BLOCKED you, you been (BLOCK) vadalizing wiki 4 2 damn (BLOCK) long. And I'm not (BLOCK) retared, I don't think that (BLOCK) is a word. You really must (BLOCK) be retarded. Oh yeah I was blocked for a long time, months even. I've been blocked 3 times for dealing with pricks like you, but Enjoy the rest of your BLOCK...I mean day. Now let me continue to laugh. Oh absolutly, I'm still crying because I take the Internet thing very seriously I have e-feelings. Just like you have e-friends. What I shame, I still can't edit in Wikipedia, right? It's a zero! " +Stopped as of now. She's not worth a response and I apologize for all this. Now, I also know you do not need the support of someone like me. You are in a better place than that. Abientot!75.21.97.99 +" Say what? I decide to check out the AfD articles, not something I normally get involved in. I come to an article for deletion, A Course in Miracles (book). I look over it I see it's been documented and footnoted almost to the very last comma. I observe a tremendous argument ensuing over one word, ""cult"", that's being interpreted multiple ways. Multiple editors are squabbling over whether User:Ste4k is being ""POV"" for using it. I change the wording to eliminate the troublesome word while meeting what I see as the intent of the original author of the quote, Garrett. I think I do an adequate if not very eloquent job. I go to a lot of effort to explain what and why I made the change, citing the dictionary, etc. I do screw up and forget to sign some of my work, which you helpfully catch and fix. I then vote in the AfD to delete the article but to keep its content and merge it into the main article. I explain my reasoning, but without going into detail as to my views of both articles as they presently stand. If I had, I would have said something along the lines that the main article flows well and is comprehensive; I think it's generally well written. At the same time, it screams out for about 200 {{fact}} tags. It's not clear to me how reliable it is. The book article, by contrast, is not as pretty and, as the principal author herself more or less says, reads like a U.S. District Court decision. There's a reason judges' decisions are not high literature and that's because they're shooting for reliability and precision, not memorable prose. There's considerable overlap between both articles with much discussion as to whether there should be a book article and a movement article or just one combined article; there's even discussion as to whether the word ""movement"" should be used. It seems to me as it all this talk of different articles is putting the cart before the horse (reliability), so I vote ""merge and delete"" so that the overall Wikipedia coverage can get fixed and streamlined with some sort of consensus built. Now I wake up and I find that you've spent hours during the night sarcastically mutilating your own article. It appears that one word, ""cult"", and my good faith editing of its usage may have been your tipping point to go into a frenzy. That or my one vote in the AfD process. If you don't like my cult edit, just reverse it and explain how I got it wrong. Then there's this message on my talk page: ""I'm not originally from the U.S. I was born in Kharkov. In our country, we beat liars, and if one wants to eat, they work. The only POV in that article I wrote was that I wanted to find out the truth, did research, marked it with citations for verifiability, refused to consider any source that came from some primary provider, and all I found out for my trouble was that this encyclopedia isn't even worth quoting. You should be ashamed to have your familiy member's name on this medium. "" What do I make of this? Are you saying that I'm a liar and should (or would) be beaten? That I should be working harder to eat? And what's this about my family? And as for Wikipedia, being flawed, it certainly is that. It is profoundly flawed in terms of the reliability of some of its material. In fact, if so many millions of people didn't use it, I'd say forget about it. But the fact is, Wikipedia is very important and growing in importance everyday. Every day, more people abandon traditional sources of reliable information such as Britannica and turn to Wikipedia. Every month, Wikipedia's Google rankings move up higher and are often in the top 5 for a given search. The fact that so many other sites such as answers.com mirror the content makes what's written in Wikipedia seem all the more ""reliable"" since to the undiscerning, it looks like other sites are agreeing with Wikipedia. So like it or not, Wikipedia is here to stay and further grow in importance. You can fume and I can fret, but our children and grandchildren will use it more and more as their first source of knowledge, reliable or not. That almost pessimistic view of Wikipedia's growing role is what motivates me not some idealistic, Woodstockian notion that ""information longs to be free"" or so much of the other idealistic stuff that motivates thousands of mostly earnest, smart but very young editors on this project. " +REDIRECT Talk:Newark Broad Street Station +" Your submission at Articles for creation Natalya Pasichnyk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! (used EDIT!) " +" Australian Heritage This article states she is of Australian heritage when Australian is not considered an ethnicity/ancestral background as all white Australians have some sort of European heritage. Her surname is of English (Anglo-Saxon) origin, however considering she hasn't stated her heritage we can't claim it to be English purely based on her surname as there could be other ethnicities in her, but I propose that the line ""her parents are of Australian heritage"" be changed to her parents are of Anglo and/or English Australian heritage, or just simply remove the line. " +I AM A nOOb. I suck bad.Real Bad. I am sorry for my uncivilised actions on wikipedia. Please forgive my noobness. +HIV transmission does NOT have a constant level of risk per exposure. Some people are genetically resistant (e.g. CCR5_Δ32#CCR5-.CE.9432) as potential recipients, and some people are likely not to be very infectious even if infected (e.g. HLA B*57). In addition, acutely infected people are the most infectious, and people with genital ulcer disease are likely to be both high transmitters and particularly susceptible. So, the risk depends dramatically on many variables. In addition, it's known that the cumulative risk approaches only about 40% (in discordant couples), and the uninfected partners tend to show evidence of cellular immunity to HIV (suggesting exposure). +"=Alnami=== The living Ahmed Alnami 10 years older than dead terrorist Alnami; 33 from Riyadh [UK Telegraph] vs. 23 from Asir [Washington Post]. talk| contribs ==" +" If it's still called a front-bend in that position, fair enough. You're right, it's mostly just a case of rotation and getting gravity to assist a bit. As for the other point, I wouldn't consider myself well-edowed, and I can still do it, so that line at the start just seems wrong unless I'm just the ""exception to the rule"". I doubt that I am, though." +TWIGS There are important distinctions between branches and twigs. Branches are heavy structural elements, representing fairly mature tissue, that support twigs. Twigs, on the other hand, specifically bear leaves, flowers, fruit, and buds, and usually have a markedly different bark and appearance from branches. Twigs are critically important in species identification. I'll edit the separate branch and twig articles later to make sure this is reflected. user:jaknouse +. The first column was ordered northward to aid them; instead it beat the second column back to Moung Phalane. The Tchepone Operation ended on 13 November +See below regarding my comment to you. I made no insinuations regarding your private life, I mearly was attempting to be accurate as to why you were behaving immaturely in my conflict with your friend sarah_ewart if you objected to the reference to her being your lover (the only explanation I could come up with for such an extreme reaction) you had merely to note it and I would remove it. +I seriously think you need to take off the swastika badge, shave off the little 'tache and keep your arms, especially the right one, down by your side at all times. Oh, and Poland have been on the phone. They want you to stop invading them. They said it wasn't funny in the 30's and it still isn't now. +My sincere apologies. I can assure you the these childish pranks will cease since I found out who the culprit was. Cheers to all citizens of Chatham-Kent! +Suck my DIHCK! Nihgga! +Idle Threats You don't scare me cyber bully 129.2.44.155 +On irrelevant links == The link to businessweek is clearly irrelevant to the lead, as it is about the company, and not about the protocol, and any projection from company to the protocol is prohibited WP:SYN. The link also barely qualifies as WP:RS (at least in the description part which is routinely written for such profiles by company itself). Overall, the article is a BIG MESS now, and one of the reason for this mess is because of throwing in all the links which are barely relevant to the statements within. I will proceed with inserting {cn} at all the relevant places at least in the lead - it MAY help to clarify which links are relevant to which sentences. Ipsign, while I agree the article's a mess, spamming templates every other word isn't constructive, it just makes it hard to read. I doubt there's even a WP guideline to cite, as that's just ridiculous. -) The entire article has been flagged as needing citations; if you're challenging an uncited claim, just remove it. == +" Anyhow, let him go cry about it... I will do the same. lol ) (mailbox) " +" Awickert, this article (Deformation (mechanics) has the objective, which you propose, of discussing in one article the concept of deformation (strain). And from here to link to other, more detailed, articles about Finite and Infinitesimal deformation theories. If some of the material that was in the article strain tensor is not included please bring it back into this article or the Infinitesimal strain theory article. Renaming the Infinitesimal strain theory, and Finite strain theory into infinitesimal strain and finite strain it is something I have to think about. My first impression is that the word ""theory"" is broader than just saying ""strain"". " +We are talking about the Funimation dubs. No they dont have swearing. Theirs no point in arguing with them bc they want the article to be incomplete and inaccurate. +Changed WDAP to WPAD in the article. +Ben Schumin has a Conflict of Interest with regard to the Portal of Evil and Old Man Murray websites. He is a former poster on the forums of both sites, who stopped posting out of embarrassment after a series of incidents in which his rigid autistic moral standards failed to coincide with that of the posting public and led to emotional disturbances and erratic behavior on the part of the selfsame Ben Schumin. His administrative actions against the articles for these sites are efforts at attaining revenge, and nothing else. Thank you. 76.99.33.125 MTV Jams +" Oppose trivial, do they actually say the characters or are users guessing? Haven't seen it yet....plus if it is kept, needs to be in paragraph form. chat " +" Hi, Zad ... if you only knew how appropriate a squirrel post to me is at this juncture in my life! If I knew you better, I'd email you my squirrel stories, but the last person I told them to wasn't amused and seemed to side with the squirrels ... or should I say former squirrels ... Don't worry ... my editing is not affected by admin good and bad actions ... ask someone to tell you the history of admin abuse I went through when I was new to Wikipedia, and how that ended ) Thanks so much for squirrel laughs ... I will add them to my Limoges box commemorating the winning of the squirrel wars in my household! Best, (Talk) " +Contested deletion This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) +please please don't be a cunt +Thanks for the heads up. +This information about Operation Preserve is also very important, especially for his supporters. Here is an additional link: http://www.brooklynron.com/housing/ ~~nycapple123 +" While you're within your rights to nominate the article at WP:GAR, in this case I don't think it's a good idea. The original review wasn't in bad faith, nor was it lacking detail or suggestions needed to bring the article up to GA standards. In those cases, it's usually easier to fix up the article, address the review comments, and then renominate it at WP:GAN. Either way, there are still several outstanding points from the original review that haven't been addressed, and failure to do so means that the article still doesn't meet the standards for sources, referencing and research.  → " +Hopefully I've done it right, wasn't quite sure what to title it all though. +" I also don't care WHO is doing it, all I know is there are LOTS of other pages with the same ""scope"" but I don't see them being ""proposed to be deleted""." +This reads awful. Who wrote this? All I see is the same phrase over and over- she said, she said. I think it sounds more encyclopedic to say, Lopez stated, or Lopez confirmed. This reads like a fan boy wrote this.98.240.76.78 +Thank you for your kind response, Jim. Hrafn, do you have a more suitable one? Thanks. Talk +My last name is Pfund. Am i related to him? +" The Spinor bundle is a vector bundle, but not part of the Tensor bundle. ITYM the ""Definition"" box of Tensor#As multidimensional arrays in this article. I've never seen a definition of the tensor bundle that included a structure group, although such a definition is customary for the more general Fiber bundle. Note that Spinor bundle refers to the Orthonormal frame bundle rather than to the Tangent bundle. " +Bio means life or living!! Cell isn't mechanical or not completely mechanical. Notice that he has living tissue. (example) During the battle with Gohan, he is blasted by an enormous Kamehameha Wave. as a result he loses a few limbs, and starts to BLEED! MACHINES DON'T BLEED!! This is proof that he is more than a simple Jinzoningen! Also notice that #16-#20 don't regenerate! while cell is the only Jinzoningen that does, besides Coola if he even counts! +"Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 123 " +" {| style=""background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |- | style=""border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;""| Hello, Cupcakeofawesomeness, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! +Kleargear paid whoore = (_O_) +A public company is one listed on the stock exchange and available to purchasers shares. CityRail is a Crown Corporation owned by the Crown in right of NSW. +What the above means is that edits like this are generally frowned upon ) Please contribute constructively. Cheers,— • (yo?); November 29, 2011; 13:07 (UTC) +maybe just activity on WP +No, it doesn't. That's what NPOV is all about. +Hey Fucko Hello. I saw your humorous additions to the Parrot article, if you feel the need to contribute anything else of a similar caliber I will be forced to journey to your place of residence, whereupon I will rape the ever loving shit out of your loose, dirty, nigger asshole. Okay? 130.218.80.4 +Help needed I have heeded your advice from the help desk and opened an RfC here Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Duke53_2. There is currently some discussion at the talk page there as well. I would appreciate your help and advice. +RfC Hello. If you can spare a few minutes your opinion would be appreciated at: Wikiproject/Discographies#Do music videos and other charted songs belong. +I am going to remove it until someone can explain and justify it more clearly.86.46.249.176 +Madeline La Framboise I see you have edited the Madeline La Framboise article. I changed your edits because my sources, http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~gentner/indi/355.html#p3554, differ from your information. If you have a reliable source for your information please refer to it. If you need help, I would be happy to show you how. I have done quite a bit of research on Madeline and would be very interested in any info you have found. Lets discuss it. Thank you - +huh? sorry but there is some kind of mistake. i have not been vandalising. please correct your ways next time. thank you. +" Confused apologies! I have no idea what my warning was about, particularly as I never seem to have tagged that page with or even edited it. This is weird and somehow my mistake. I've removed the warning.(⇒) " +So you're opposed to forming a consensus on merging because no former consensus to merge was formed? That strikes me as being self defeating, but to each their own. +Comments The Clive Barker-related articles seem okay, although were I you I'd work on getting my sentence structure to be a bit more... elegant. As is, your clauses interrupt each other a bit too frequently. +Hi Chris, don't forget to look at the previous edits to this talk page ) 94.14.142.147 +I am trtying to get rid or this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_A_Bad_Boy because there is an article just like it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_a_Bad_Boy. The only difference is that the A is upercase and need to be loer case. So can you do this. Also for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iFight_Shelby_Marx and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_a_Bad_Boy and you change the name to iCarly: iDate Bad Boy and iCarly iFight Shelby Marx. For some reason it is not letting me do this. The show title is just spelled wrong thanks +" I'd say that by now the chronology by Rohl has nothing to do anymore with whatever Velikovsky did. And as I said, equations as Hathepsut=Queen-of-Sheba or Thutmose3=Shishak are not part of Rohl's framework at all. There should be an article ""New Chronology by Rohl"" or a (big) section in the Rohl article. " +" Why does no one know when she began to take the title of oldest living person? It's given as ""? - 113"" in Oldest living people since 1955? 218.186.12.250 " +"::Actually, guideline supports such lists. His simple opinion is as valid as all those who have expounded at length and so must be respected. '''' MICHAEL Q.'' " +Shane douglas has been known to play runescape for over 6 days in a row non stop and is known to be the god of runescape and has been admired by thousands of players around the world. he has been a fan of runescape since it had began and if you want to talk to him his acount name is yesbadboy1. ifyou have any thing you want to ask him anything dont be afraid to ask him he give you lots of things to help you master the game. +List of My Three Sons episodes I saw you redirected two of the season episode lists back to the article a month ago, which removed them from both articles, since it was transcluded. I substituted the list back into the main article, and was about to remove the links back to the season lists, but the other seasons still have separate pages. I thought I'd just ask for your thoughts. It might be easier to just undo the substitution and redirects. -XT+ +" Bay of Pigs air support I removed the sentence ""President Kennedy had withdrawn support for the invasion at the last minute by canceling several bombing sorties that could have crippled the entire Cuban Air Force"" and someone re-inserted it with a reference to a rambling article on a far-right wing web site. An article which of course gives no references to first-hand accounts, documents etc. about this, we just have to take the word of a conservative named Humberto Fontova. But beyond this, Fontova doesn't say anything that supports the idea that Kennedy withdrew support that had been pledged, canceled sorties that had been scheduled and so forth. Fontova's article does not fall under the Wikipedia:Reliable sources category, but more importantly, Fontova is not even a source for the allegations made. This is being remove again. " +" Paul, you seem to be assuming that everyone with an M.D. Is engaged in evidence based practice, while this is clearly not the case. You further appear to be asserting that users of specific treatment modalities, e.g. massage, are engaged in ""naturopathic"" treatment. This is a false generalization, as the use of one modality does not imply the use of the whole suite. come howl! " +Guia Circuit and Bucharest Ring. +, 26 February 2009 (UTC) The templates were deleted and 1 user deleted his loop, and I took care of another one for a user who hasn't been around for over a year (so waiting for his answer might be ill recommended) and there is just 1 left. That user has received a message on his talk page. 21:32 +" Bot report Found duplicate references ! In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically ) ""'2008 JHU Sustainability Initiatives'"" {{cite web|title=2008 JHU Sustainability Initiatives|url= http://www.sustainability.jhu.edu/index.html|publisher=Johns Hopkins University |year=2008|accessdate=2008-05-25}} {{cite web|title=2008 JHU Sustainability Initiatives|url= http://www.sustainability.jhu.edu/ecoreps.html|publisher=Johns Hopkins University |year=2008|accessdate=2008-05-25}} {{cite web|title=2008 JHU Sustainability Initiatives|url= http://www.sustainability.jhu.edu/student_groups.html|publisher=Johns Hopkins University |year=2008|accessdate=2008-05-25}} " +What if I gets myself a new IP? What happens then? +" Disambiguation page Given as ""Firefox"" stands for a very popular browser, aswell as a very popular film, amongst even more things, it it senseless to discuss which one of them is the most important. I have therefor redirected the page to the disambiguation page. " +" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Freakum-dress.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Freakum-dress.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " +guys like you annoy me so much i fucking hate guys like you i don't give a fuck if they close my account i just hate guys like you you stupid motherfucker googdbye +" RFA You have double posted to several RFAs, please review for example, Fainites and Jc3s5h. (Talk) " +On second thought, why not instead provide a new user setting that allows each user to choose for himself whether wikilinks are displayed as intended by the author or literally as linked? That should be trivial to add to the code, and everyone would be happy. 07:44 Jan 30, 2003 (UTC) +" Shortened term Rather than cantana, which would be the best way to shortcut the name? Also hat Gott die Welt geliebt, BWV 68? or BWV 68? or Also hat Gott die Welt geliebt?...etc. I only ask, because I think ""cantana"" is used a bit too often in the prose. For example ""He later inserted most of them in his third annual cantata cycle, but kept this one and..."" Rather than say ""this one"", I think we need to be a bit more descriptive bearing in mind we speak of other cantatas before this mention. It would be wrong of us to use the full title, I just wondered if there was a shortened term we could use. Talk " +I just read your e-mail, I will retract my claim of legal action, but I can't my page is locked. I thank you again, I really do...whenever you unblock that page I will make my statement of dropping any and all legal actions. +Tags This page has been tagged, without any explanation Please explain why it is: Non-notable: the term has produced 70,000 google hits, so someone has heard of it Neologism: I cannot see any word here that isn’t in a dictionary Requiring references: There are 3 external links on this page; and both of these, “35 Who Made a Difference” and Amateur Astronomy's Revolutionary on the John Dobson page refer to “Sidewalk astronomy”. At least one of them should qualify as a reliable 3rd party source. +" i still dont agree... ...but i decided to give in on the body count. ""The cleverer give in"", they say. " +" The following are demonstrably true facts about Max Bemis: 1) He does not like black people 2) He is a Holocaust denier 3) He has gone on record saying that incest ""in the bomb, yo"" I can provide sources for all of these, so anyone who just deletes this section out of hand is not really in the spirit of wikipedia's quest for acquisition of knowledge" +u made ur damn personal attacks when u called me a vandal bud. all i did was update it. if u dun like how i write u can rewrite it but dont u damn go deleting shit without replacing it. +Also to add to my rant- just wiki how ip addresses work so you feel like an idiot for accusing me about doing something i didnt do +I created Zayda Y Los Culpables today. Though really stubby and just nominated for speedy, it will get better with your addition. By the way, what was Aquino's band? +~~I don't think the reference to Dirtbags, i.e. taking you to a paget hat has nothign to do with a movie, but a southern california softball team is anything that is worth putting on here. +RFA With your RFA only hours away from closing, it looks like you will be a new admin. I would like to tell you that I voted for you, and that I believe you will be a good admin! I will be intouch soon to congratulate you! Good Job, +" It's best if page history changes like that are done as soon as possible, so that's what I've done. I Hope it's all OK now! ''''''87 " +" uncited/wrongly formatted material removed from article Removed this: '' Maintaining law and order Pistols Law and order Men are robbed Tents are cut open Tar and feathers Gold licences 30 shillings a month (3 dollars) When diggers dug they have to organise the law and order themselves. Nearly every night robbers cut open tents and rob the diggers gold so, the diggers have to keep a pistol under their pillow. Diggers watched the people get punished and laugh at the robbers, one there's favourite punishments was putting on the robbers and then feathers on them. Diggers had to pay 30 shillings to dig gold. Keeping gold safe Gold dust Warm matchbox Guard dogs Hand commissioner Kept there gold is special bag Kept wax to seal it Transported gold to major cities Bush rangers Diggers usually found gold dust so they have to warm it up, so they kept it in a warm matchbox to melt it together. They kept guard dogs so they don't have to hide there gold. They would hand their gold to commissioner to keep it safe if they didn't have a guard dogs. Some kept there gold in a special bag and they kept wax on its opening to seal it, to transport the gold to major city to keep it safe from bush rangers. The licence system Joe, joe Tied to a tree Not really in the mood to format it in whatever way now; there might be usable stuff in it but it was below References and also ""signed"" by the IP user who added it. " +Thanks for the heads up! I actually had some squirms about that one, but I must have ignored them ^_^/ Cheers. '''''''''''mperator +GA review Hi, I'm going to be reviewing your GAN Speech generating device. Will start soon. Please feel free to ask me any questions or give me feedback. Best wishes, +", 31 May 2007 (UTC) I don't mean to argue about it, really, but I just found it exceedingly strange and tried to propose a compromise that catered to both parties. I do recall a part in ""The Secret Life . . ."" where a doctor put him so unlaughably high on the BP scale that he was very concerned, and that would certainly be a sourced counterargument. I'll look into it and see if it has merit. If not, I'm sure that he'll clarify it sometime in the future. 05:21" +record the ufc website lists his record as 3-1. why doesn't wiki? undefeated is undefeated. 3-1 is 3-1. get it right. +Gone through with a bit of a hedge trimmer approach. ) I don't think I removed anything too essential, and the section seems to be a lot more pointed and concise now. +Good Grief It's articles like this one that make Wikipedia the fine wine that it is... +Special note, for a special someone Fuck you, eat shit. +Thank you very much. Recategorised the image. +Aeroshuttle? FAO EEMeltonIV Saw your comment in the List of Starfleet ship classes article about the origins of the references to the Voyager Aeroshuttle. I would like to add my own doubts to yours so to speak - I can't recall coming across this anywhere. Does anyone else have any thoughts? +I agree, there is no specified limits - so how do we resolve this? Which of us has the right to set things their way? +subversive? I wanted to help you because it seemed you suffered from some disabalities. Now it seems you did it on purpose. Regarding hindering mmy surfing: you do it by deleting ubuntu from the dist cat. No top right hand link to the dist cat, after you edit. And last but not least, i did not destroy hierarchy, this is blatant nonsense. (Talk) +References Some references in English might help, the one you put there is in polish.. i do not think everyone can read polish, i have a basic understanding but nowhere near what is needed to read that encyclopedia. +Innotata, you'd have found that this editor's prose is awful. Also, they're indefinitely blocked: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeronicaPR. Keep this SPI in mind: the user is addicted to GA reviews of snakes. Happy days, +Please unblock me. I am sorry for the vandalism and personal attacks I have made. It is my fault. I promise I won't do it again. But my account is not only used for vandalism. Check my contributes. Most of them are good edits. I will make more edits like them if I'm unblocked. So can I be unblocked please. +" Requesting information on a banned user Dear Mr. Chapman: I write to you to request information regarding the blocking/banning of User:Mr Spunky Toffee, sockpuppet of User:Brian G. Crawford. I ask because I had a run-in with him a couple of months ago, in which he attempted to delete a page I had written and insulted me repeatedly. I was intrigued (but not altogether surprised) to discover a few days ago that he had been blocked as a sock-puppet, but I do know that he had a long history of personal attacks on other users. What I would like to know is, what was it that got Brian G. Crawford banned from Wikipedia in the first place? He is not listed on Wikipedia:List of banned users, nor is he included in the Category:Banned Wikipedia users. His user page states that ""This user is banned from all Wikimedia projects by order of the Foundation."" But, the Wikipedia:Banning policy page states that ""The Wikimedia Foundation has the authority to ban users, though it has not exercised this authority on the English Wikipedia."" So frankly, I am a bit confused as to what went on here, which is why I am asking you, as you are the one who discovered that Mr Spunky Toffee was Crawford's sockpuppet. I will understand if this information is confidential or otherwise unavailable; if this is the case please let me know on my talk page. Or, if you would rather talk to me in private (by e-mail or otherwise), let me know and I would be happy to accommodate you. I thank you in advance for your assistance. " +Amen Nothing •__• +Semitic Christian speakers of Aramaic is what I think you're trying to say. And they are called Assyrian or Chaldo-Assyrian. User:King Legit +Meanwhile I have completely replaced the Rediscovering references with different references, so now I'm curious as to whether you'll continue to just delete the entire text without discussion. +Wait, can I still edit my own pages? As in my user pages? +So I can't talk on a talk page? Good to know. Thanks. You win. Congratulations. Your prize is that you are a wanker. +Actually, this material can be sourced to the article in Shore Magazine from which you copied most of it verbatim—in doing that, you committed a copyright violation. Please see the following policy page: WP:CV. If you can rewrite a summary of the information about Bernstein at IU and then use methods described in the above link to cite the source, that would probably not be considered such a violation. +" Nancy Reagan Thanks for asking. I removed the mention of ""the late"" as everyone dies sometime, and not every mention of those who have died has ""the late"" preceding. I like to assume that the readers here are intelligent, and that they (for the most part) know that he has died, and if they don't, you can click the link and find out more about him. I made a long argument in the talk page for PETA about why it should be discouraged (in most cases) to include that phrase. Would the World Book encyclopedia refer to the dead as ""the late""? I doubt it, and we're here to improve on the print encyclopedias. " +Payment? How? In the bookkeeping text I'm studying it says: hours worked times rate of pay minus taxes deducted is net pay. In the specific example the employee was paid about the federal minimum wage. Looking at it from the employee's point of view it seemed nowhere near enough. Looking at it from the employer's point of view it seemed impossible, because it had to come from not only charging more for products than the company bought them for but also from people actually buying it and being able to buy it. I wonder what the book was leaving out. Then, I read this article and it didn't tell me either. Tell me, how does the free market add up? Why does it work? Is it a miracle? Is it some part of business I don't know about? +Unbridled censorship from those who are making highly personal judgements while deliberately NOT checking the references on the hard work of others are RETARDS and offensive in the extreme. THEY deserve to be deleted, period and end of sentence. ge deleted from further +" Macedonian culture (ethnic group) I moved Macedonian culture (Slavic) to Macedonian culture (ethnic group) because of the following reasons: It follows the same consistency with other Macedonian related pages, such as Macedonians (ethnic group) Macedonian culture is not purely Slavic, as it is a mix of Byzantine, Slavic and Ottoman Macedonians don't identify as being an ""ethnic Slavic"", and I don't believe such an ethnic group exists in our present day. " +This bitch is a cunt! +" Crappy organization People should be listed by era in which they acted, not when they were born. If not then at least find a better way to organize them as by birth date is confusing and somewhat irrelevent. If you're going to stick with this particular categorial method then at least headline it like, ""born in the 1980's"" rather then ""1980s"" which confused me right off." +I was banned for this: http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality and I am now BRI for this: http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality and this: http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality came from God. So be damned, MuZemike, daemon in human skin. I was banned for this: www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality and I am now BRI for this: www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality and this: www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Category:Primordiality came from God. So be damned, MuZemike, daemon in human skin. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Agriculture. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk " +Ghost car as unmarked police car This is very common slang in Canada, to the point that police themselves often refer to unmarked police cars as such. I've added a redirect note to this effect Freyyr890 +" I find it hard to believe that you didn't know you write a verbatim copy of the website, but the content was {{Unreferenced|date=December 2012}} {{Infobox university |name = Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital |native_name = दरभंगा मेडिकल कॉलेज और अस्पताल |image = | |established = 1946 |type = [[Public university|Public]] |city = [[Darbhanga]] |country = [[India]] |students = |staff = |campus = [[urban area|Urban]] }}'''History''' ''' http://www.darbhangamedicalcollege.in/aboutus.php{{dead link|date=December 2012}} then the exact content of the body of http://www.darbhangamedicalcollege.in/aboutus.php and then ==Courses Offered== Following courses are offered:{{cite | url = http://mohfw.nic.in/ubihar.html{{dead link|date=December 2012}} | title = List of Recognised Medical Qualifications}} * MBBS (90 seats) * MD - Biochem, Forensic Med, Microbiol, Med, Paediatrics, Pathol, Pharmacol, Physiology, Preventive & Social Med, Radio-diagnosis, * MS - Anaesthesiology, Anatomy, ENT Surgery, Obst & Gynae, Ophthal, Orthopaedics * Diplomas - DA, DCH, DCP, DGO, DMRD, DOMS, DTMH, DLO ==Address== Laheriasarai, Bihar, India - 846003 ==References== {{Reflist}} ==External links== *[http://institutions.education4india.com/3649/darbhanga-medical-college-laheriasarai-846003-darbhanga-bihar/ Educational Institutes of India ] *[http://gov.bih.nic.in/Profile/Institutions.htm Educational Institutes of Bihar] {{coord missing|Bihar}} [[Category:Universities and colleges in Bihar]] [[Category:Medical colleges in Bihar]]" +Request for Rollback I am on English Wikipedia since June 2011. I face vandalism from diferent users when I am active. I am familiar distinguishing vandalism from good-faithed edits. It would be very helpful to work against vandalism if you grant me rollback permission. Regards. Khan +Am I bovvered? 220.245.146.235 +WHAT KIND OF NAME IS SUNSHINE YOU ARE AN IDIOT +Hello I just wanted to let you know how you can be a nicer person through therapy and talking about your past experiences that led you to be an angry antisocial person today. +I totally disagree with all these ideas. The setlist changes every night of the tour. For instance: each night, the audience votes for the venue song. The order of the songs may change too. Besides, the Oceania postponed tour dates section is a precious information. This section is not randomly crossed out. Wikipedia may not be a directory, I'm glad to hear it, nevertheless, many other concert tours articles show such exhaustive setlists section... and that's great! +I have been specific. I did explain why the current lead is vague. I did explain why the lead should be able to stand alone. See WP:LEAD. +at the end of a cluttered section +" Yes, there's some good stuff going on with The Beatles articles, not least resulting from your own dedicated and prolific work. It seemed a few feathers were ruffled by my moderately spectacular debut on the Talk page, what with the famous ""The"" closely followed by the merger/split disagreements, but I then saw from the Talk archives that in fact the disturbances I stirred up pale into insignificance compared with actually quite a lot of what's gone before! I have to say I was very impressed that although a small number of the responses I got were perhaps merely provocative, much of what people said was very civil, intelligent and reasonable, and continued to be so despite my minority of about one! Anyway, that's history, but as you say, the improvements currently being made on Beatles articles are very encouraging, and it's great to be working on them with such people. " +" Time to add ""recent developments/aftermath"" section? Commentary's starting to come in concerning the question of ""what next?"" for OWS, and it might be time to add a short section to this effect. I think to be clear that we should avoid language that sounds like we're making pronouncements in WP's editorial voice, instead presenting various claims clearly as various claims rather than some 'truth' of OWS. A few sources that might be useful here: LA Times Natasha Lennard piece in Salon The Graeber piece that got kicked around awhile back " +re:Personal attack Can you explain the reason why you wrote the wrong name on purpose? +Don't be such a sandy vagina. Leave it to a fag to be such a let down. People are just having fun editing joke pages. No real person would ever sight wikipedia as a credible source. Your job and everything you do is worthless. You're worthless as a human being. Take the dick out of your ass and calm down. +Homos on Wikipedia Hi Chris! Thanks for becoming part of the Wikipedia community! However, there re lots of homos who edit Wikipedia. Here is a list of all the homos on Wikipedia. I hope you can set them on the straight path, because God and Jesus hate sodomy! +I'm also going to develop playhouse but am currently waiting for the redirect bot to sort out links following the needed move. +Whatever gave you the impression that I have the slightest interest in your opinion? Wanker. +I know that Daniel has often (and correctly) commented that the use of VP by anons (possibly vandals) might prove deleterious vis-à-vis the program's future +I hope you leave this shithole like that faggot did. +Holocaust Ownership Holocaust as Featured Article I cannot see the Holocaust article getting being FA. Simply because it fails to address the Ownership of the Holocaust issues which sees two mutually exclusive positions, both being accepted standpoints in society. The first being the Jewish tragedy relies on motive and the second thematic would be the mechanics argument which points to the systematic killings and the disparate groups that were killed at the numerous camps. As the article sees the Holocaust as a mainly Jewish event, it would be highly unlikely that it would be featured, else to fly in the face of academics and commonly held social views. It is not a case of also these groups were killed, it is the thematic of groups targetted, groups killed. Lest we forget the first killed at Auschwitz were not Jewish. The lack of attention paid to what is the prevelant perception in Britain in both the academic field as well as socially held views means that the article really does address a common theme. Ownership. +I say a lot in that post. Maybe you could tell me which parts you disagree with. +I disagree. Different nations exhibit very different soldiers, and since the page is really not very full in terms of words, pitctures will make up the space quite nicely. +Listen up Mofo Dont f*cking edit what i write you curry munchin sod..... take up you jerk off business elsewhere now son! +Thus, the Christian nature of Baldwin's position makes it a fair assumption that Baldwin is speaking in the role of his pastoral authority as one who is trained in Christian doctrine and practice, and speaking for what he believes to be the views of the supposed head of his organization, Jesus (unless he specifically qualifies his views as not necessarily Christian). Therefore, making the assumption that he is representing his views as 'Christian' seems to me to be only fair. +And thus...Lady just so happens to be the daughter of Kalina Ann. =/ I don't see what you're bellyaching about... +He blocked all user with different POV today in accusations in meatpuppetry. +" Lol, interesting manoeuver there! You know, some people delete the main page, some people edit their RfAs so it looks like they lost. But no, only a bureaucrat can change the bit. — (t • @ • c) " +Materazzi is Italy's disgrace. The vistory of Italy come to nothing, it did not have any value because of Materazzi. +"I am quite certain ""Testament"" is the name for the group, not for each individual member. There is always a chance that I'm mistaken. That's why I'm saying this. I want to see if anyone has any official material that states I am wrong. If I'm right, it would be great if someone could go through and correct this mistake (which is actually on a lot of the Xenosaga articles). I would actually be willing to help in correcting everything, provided someone can confirm whether or not it's actually a mistake. " +Jim1138, there was no edit warring. You kept adding in a duplication of content directly above it. Read that again. you were adding in duplicate content. Are you tell me, I should have left it? +catskill mountains have given reason. is unsourced material, and therefore in violate of main wikipedia tenet to not be original research. is constructive to adhere to these, yes? will redo, please to justify inclusion. are free to add citations for material, but please leave unsourced material out of article as to better serve wikipedia core concepts. +" Now that month-of-minutes is what I call a real ""outlier"", just like Ruthven, Ontario. " +Well if that the way to go maybe Killing vector should have done just that before removing 1/8 of the article among important issue as the Soviet opening attack? +Thanks Thanks for the improvement of Born to Die as adding The Paradise edition entirely +== FUCK YOU DAVE SOUZA == +) hey Mother Fucking asshole hows going . i wanna rape ur mother . and will post that video YouPorn dot com or matacafe or pornotube dot com . u tell me wher i should upload it . hehehehehehehehehehheheheehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehehehe r rapeing ur Mother will be shaggadelic baby ( as astin powers say +Exactly, you sound like a pundit in history, may be you should help the helpless govt out!! .History was no doubt manipulated in all ages by the powerful. +AWNB updater fix the apostrophe problem (on the deletion sorting page) for ye olde bot. 207.6.245.26 +The Neo-Nazis come back again after many years! +Removing others' comments On this edit of yours (rapidly reverted by . +" Image Tagging Image:PICT0285c.JPG This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:PICT0285c.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. talk " +I will not self revert, as the link to the actual documents is extremely apropos, and the copyright holders have not asserted that their emails be withheld from the wikipedia. Unless it's a new policy to kill all links from wikileaks, in which case we can team up and delete them all. +Megadeth article... Right, what is wrong with Megadeth having an article for their new album exactly. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY? Go for it... Enlighten me. +Martin O'Malley GAR Martin O'Malley, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. +" In fact Most of the already-existing text (e.g. terms such as ""reckless"" or ""egotistical"") would also qualify as non-neutral if subjected to a thorough scrutiny. " +" JP, thank you for finally explaining what your problem is. Of course what Jackson said is relevant. This is an article on Jesse Jackson. If Jackson puts his foot in his mouth, it is relevant. A cited statement does not violate NPOV. I learned that fact the hard way when I tried to edit cited statements out of the article on Michael Savage. As far as whether or not Jackson contradicted himself, are you denying that Jackson used to be for interracial marriage? Do you want me to cite a source saying that he used to be for interracial marriage? Liberals like Jackson have always referred to conservative whites from the south who opposed interracial marriage as ""racists."" Evidently, it's ""in"" for a minority to be against interracial marriage, though. Or maybe it's that white men can't have black women, but black men can have white women with Jesse. It's pretty obvious to me that if Jackson is now saying that it's ""illegal"" for a white man to fantasize about a black woman (What the hell does he mean by this? It's perfectly legal to fantasize. What an idiot!), then he is obviously against white men dating black women. He wants ""whitey"" to keep his hands off black ""property."" Perhaps Jackson needs a translator, since he frequently says things that make no sense. Do you know what Jackson meant? I honestly don't see any violation. Please elaborate further, and we can work out a compromise. However, I will get the statement in the article. Liberals who hate Michael Savage have a bunch of negative quotes about him in his article, so I think that it's fair for a conservative like me to get in negative quotes about Mr. Jackson, as long as the quotes are cited by a reputable source. " +There's nothing on the relevant discussion page, and I encourage you to cite your sources. +It's a shame that despite Wikipedia trying to shed it's image of being a poor source of information it doesn't actually seem to be doing anything about it. Facts aren't allowed here it seems on POV. Farcical. +" In US Government documentation, the phrase ""boiler plate"" is used colloquially to refer to standard language that is always included in a document (typically in a contract). If the editor in question objected to your removal of promotional language as removing the boilerplate, they meant that you were removing standard language. (It is true that if their own standard language violates Wikipedia policy, Wikipedia policy prevails in Wikipedia.) " +Worlds of Fun Anybody like that dumbass theme park from Cedar Fair? 71.74.76.40 +I'd just like to point out that Ohmefentanyl has an isomer (F9204) that is 13KX morphine. There is also an siomer mixture of Ohmefenanyl that has a reported potency in the region of 20-50KX morphine. More recent studies point to analogue such as fluoro-OMF that is even more potent. Perhaps a new section needs to be opened up to clarify this as clealry there are is some controversy over the strongest opioid or at the very least we are not 100% clear on the issue. +Vandalism LOL, proxies. 75.170.30.173 Anon +You certainly do have a source. I am still a little incredulous a the thought of Bush using this language, but that may be my own bias. I would encourage you to be bold and add it to the article (make sure you cite your reference). What is the worst that can happen? You get reverted and then (hopefully) they bring it back to the talk page. (talk) +Article Kevin Parratt Hello, I'm trying to make the article about Kevin Parratt as accurate as possible. If you change my work what should I do? If you have particular knowledge about the artist then please contribute but don't reverse my work. Regards, Olover +FYI Your account has been brought up for discussion here. +"Held !style=""background: #e3e3e3;""|Date Won !style=""background: #e3e3e3;""|Date Ended |- |" +Dear PinchasC Thank you for your input. However there are many reputable and notable sources attesting to the existence of numerous extremist messianists - also boreinuniks and elokists. Berger and others discuss them at length, as do the two notable sources (one from Haaretz no less which you removed. I think it is fair to mention these strands in the article and certainly reasonable to do so in the light of the numerous sources. Certainly the sources should also be kept. This is all in line with wiki policy as far as I can make out. The Lubavitcher Rebbe as a god, Saul Sadka, Haaretz A Brief History of Lubavitch Messianism, Melech Jaffe I do agree that Yechi should be merged into this article and not the other way round. I notices the Yechi article and thought it quite absurd that there was a Yechi article but no Mishichist article. So I thought to rectify that. Thank you again for helping out. +autoblock Look closer - I'm obviously not blocked, but my IP address at home is, due to an admin accidentally blocking me (look at the block log). +" You need to fill out the copyright information properly on the images you uploaded at wiki commons, because you falsely claimed you took the photo. let's discuss it " +I find this highly unlikely. In lieu of a reliable source both for the law and the interpretation, I have removed this from the article. I doubt that any state in the US makes provision for one citizen to kill another because he thinks something might happen and simultaneously grant legal immunity for said killing. — Lomn +The scene is now mentioned in Marketing section, still we should refrain from entering it as plot information. +"Here is the version as it currently stands on ""Political positions"": Palin also opposed the placement of beluga whales in Alaska's Cook Inlet on the engangered species list, on economic grounds.[36] Palin cited state scientists who claimed that hunting was the only factor causing the whales' decline, and that the hunting has been effectively controlled through cooperative agreements with Alaska Native organizations. [37] More recent research by the National Marine Fisheries Service suggests that despite hunting controls beluga whales in Cook's Inlet remain severely depleted and at high risk of permanent extinction. [38] " +I dunno mate. It's 90% systematics. It's really hard to write about other aspects of these infrageneric taxa - i.e. morphology, distribution and habitat, ecology, uses. Hesperian +you are right about cyprus the north so called 'trnc' is a vandal regime, you are a good man, i call you my european brother. +User:Where/Kylu I notice you've pre-emptively nominated Kylu for adminship. Would you mind if I co-nominated? Please email as well I'll be out of town in a month in about ten hours or so and may not see a talk message. Thanks. +Gefeliciteerd! Since you evidently already have all the wisdom needed, I can only wish to you all the luck to complement that! Wishing you all the best, and cordially yours, 06:00, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) +Huh? All I said was that nobody likes a snitch. Is that statement not true? +Image:481149037_m.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:481149037_m.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk +It's funny, I'm much more in the Burma camp yet I agree with this assessment... it is unfair that Myanmar looses on a tie and Burma wins. Because the ball stopped on the Burma side of the net before arbitration, Myanmar got the short end of the stick. I'm happy with the result but not in how it got there and as I said from the start, there was not going to be a good ending, either way. I'm not faulting our jury either... they just did an impossible, thankless job (on their own time) and made a decision that had to be made. Gosh we just had a couple of US Supreme Court judgments handed down today that went 5-4 and 6-3... and they had a lot more information to make their findings. +OpenGL 4.4 https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver OpenGL 4.4 support has arrived for GeForce 600/700, but because of retards like EBusiness crying to admins & mods when his vandalism is reverted, no one can edit the page. Hopefully there's a special place in hell for EBusiness and the admins and mods that support his retardedness. +" Oppose The statement ""waterboarding can be performed in ways that leave no lasting physical damage"" requires a reliable medical source, which I doubt you will find, for the simple reason that it is impossible to perform any physical act of violence in a way that guarantees no physical damage. What if the victim has a weak heart, or genetic susceptibility to heart attack? An accurate statement might be ""waterboarding may or may not result in lasting physical damage, or even death, depending on the severity of the attack, and victim's constitution and disposition"". " +First Article Again, thanks for the advice. I won't deny that I was pretty upset over my article's fast deletion. The whole purpose was to create an article on Wikipedia for a school project. Now, I feel that it's going to be a lot more work than I intended it to be. +central texas i dont think so.74.192.12.135 +Webkinzman Thanks. I was about to make an ANI report but I'll see what happens with your request. +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Melissa. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +Yep, I do. That's definitely going to be of interest to anyone who comes to read the Larkin article. +"}} }} {{Archive box |Origin up to August 2006 Previous naming polls September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 - |auto=yes |bot=MiszaBot I |age=14d |search" +Stefani stated that it's an ALBUM, not an EP. This is not up for debate. Also, the RIAA records it as a studio album. +" I'm not so sure. I'd guess it's best known as just ""Siskel & Ebert"", but as time passes fewer people will remember previous hosts. Unless we have some way of determining which title is ""best known"", I think the current title (with all the appropriate redirects) is the safest choice. - " +What is all this? I feel caught in some CSI show. I see that someone has been making edits at the library I go to. I can assure you I have made only edits I feel are contributing to Wikipedia, and I don't appreciate being accused of sockpuppeting. In response to Luna Santin, I do not always come to the library, so I am not always logged in, and often times I neglect to log in and simply make an edit; along with the fact that I am not the only kid at the library who possibly edits Wikipedia, I would guess that this contributes to my blocking and should probably log in every time. Unless there is something I can do, I will gladly wait out the ban, and apologize for any inconveniences. +" There is no reason. The current version is not an endorsement. '''''' (o rly?) " +This is mentioned in the articles Space Jockey (Alien) and Predator (alien)#Culture and history. +, resulting in the Taiwanese athlete been immediately rushed to the hospital and Korean athlete declared the winner, despite Taiwanese delegation's protests +The proof of this deliberate censorship and dishonest tactics of is shown by Macrakis recent attempt to delete my above contribution from this page. Macrakis wants to conceal the fact that modern linguistics does not support the reconstructed pronunciation as a scientific theory but only acknowledges it as an Erasmian based convention used in teaching in English speaking countries. Modern linguists are all unanimous in the fact that there is no evidence whatsoever to support the reconstructed pronunciation and Semitic linguists support that ancient Greek was pronounced exactly like modern Greek. +"Mayormcgeez; I find reasoning with this guy is totally pointless. Most of these ""bots"" have no friggen clue what's really going on out there in the real world, preferring to keep things nice and sweet and portraying that everything is fine and dandy. They like to throw around fancy terminology in their posts, while waving their bullshit piece of paper that says they're smart. Get a life. " +Re: RFA Thanks for your vote, and good luck with your FA nomination! +Your Welcome but I didnt make these pictures there from wiki-tan I made the Sailor Cuteness pic by editing a wiki-tan one +" RfA thanks Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully today with a result of (62/18/3). I will go very carefully at first, trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools, and will begin by re-reading all the high-quality feedback I received during the process, not least from those who opposed me. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! }" +Britannia vs. Hitler Look at the images of these twofollowing people. What do you think? +" Accusations directed at I have posted this here in an attempt to grab everyone's attention. While its place here may be disputed, I ask that it remain, for the purpose of getting read by everyone who needs or likes to. To whom it may concern: I am . This is the only username I have ever edited Wikipedia under. A long time ago, before this account was created, I edited as my IP for a few edits, that were entirely grammatical. A bunch of users have come into this article without making accounts, simply using their IPs. I wish to proclaim, to everyone, in all sincerity, that I am in no way connected to any of them. As for any alleged ""Meatpuppet Campaign,"" yes, I made posts on LiveJournal asking for people to come over and review the article. I invite everyone to review the posts. conveniently gone through the trouble of tracking them down, and they are available in the RfC he's preparing agaisnt me. Several LJ Users voiced distress, and I offered advice. This happens all the time in Wikipedia's IRC channel. This is far from an organized campaign, and I dispute the claim firmly. I'm do not know where all of these IP users came from. In the event that they did come from LiveJournal, I have edited the LJ posts I made, asking any users who came to Wikipedia to read through an introduction to Wikipedia, and to create an account. I also put emphasis against Personal attacks. I can't do anything more about it. If you feel this is untrue, then please, please, bring it up to me, before your decide to take up other peoples' time with the issue. I know I make mistakes, and I try to fix them when I can. I like people to tell me when they think I make them, as obviously, I don't realize all of them. Personal Attacks: I called ""ignorant."" In the atmosphere I've developed in, that's not anything close to an attack. I do apologize if anyone took offense to it, as they seem to have. I came out of the exchange feeling attacked as well. We seem to have had a cultural misunderstanding. I'll refrain from the practice of using that word as such in this environment (on Wikipedia). This is the only personal attack I remember anyone bringing to me. If you have others, please tell me. Otherwise, please stop saying that I am attacking anyone. It was an isolated incident, and we both seem to have gotten over it. Why can't you? Stop bringing it up. During the time I was gone, a bunch of anonymous users seem to have popped up here. However, none popped up at any of the other articles I am concerned with (Scottish Clans; view my contributions if you're interested). I refute any claims that are made to connect me with these users. I in no way endorse the attacks that were made upon anyone in my absence, or any attacks for that matter. I want to make that clear, and final. If you have something against me, then be honest. Please. It's all I can ask of you. I want to work things out. I suggest everyone who wishes to contribute to the process of creating an encyclopedic article out of Veganism read through Intercultural communication principles. " +Stub? Is A Bad Wind Blows in My Heart a stub now or not? +Since the website contains user-level functions in the sense that users can be banned or promoted to have higher authority, it is clear that there has to be some scope for discussing user behaviour. I am genuinely concerned about the pattern of conduct I have seen from Gwen Gale, which I consider to be abusive and inappropriate for someone wielding administrative powers. A simple Google search on her name shows that those concerns are widely shared. Please inform me about how these concerns can best be raised. According to the policy documents I have read, an RFC can be created about a user if two people share the same concern. How can the opinion of others be solicited, however, if the matter is not allowed to be discussed because it is considered an ad hominem attack?90.213.182.228 +well gustworld can start his own nolans page and iv got a good idea what place he could put it gustworld knows nothing about the nolan so his comments are not needed. thanks +He did not drop it, I denied and attacked at the same time. As for your question about aspirations above, don't you think that is a personal attack, I definatly do. How do I complain? +" Congrats! ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) " +(:)I totally agree with right frame of mind this article can be improved as well as I believe the nature of this article is such that it would have conflicting views. To reach a consensus and to have these conflicting views presented with fairness would require patience and fact based research. May be the best possible way is to give a proper structure to this article and improve on it. I would also request other contributor’s o refrain from making personal remarks, which is against spirit of the wikipedia and its concept. Thanks ( ) +Oh and also I was reading stuff about me in your talk thing and by the way I'm a he, not a she, just so you know. +" ""It is your fantasy however"" - my fantasy? ""instead of continuing this disruptive tirade"" - tirade? ""your concern is not at all legitimate"" ""baseless accusations remind me"" ""your disruptive antics of referring to them as sockpuppets"" - disruptive antics? And of course, your whole repeated mischaracterization of my original statements was hostile and inflammatory. For example, my 'accusation' was not baseless. it may not have had a basis which was substantiated in the end, but there's no reason in the world why I should have to endure threats from you because my *good faith* accusation did not prove true. (What threats? you threatened to block me, at least.) ""you will soon be blocked for baseless/unsubstantiated accusations"" - And I noticed this, where you seem to present yourself as an admin. Of course, I can tell the difference between a good faith mistake and a bad faith mistake, so I'll let it pass.129.133.127.244 " +" Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Abortion. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Dakota ~ ° " +" The Cherokee comment was a concern because JVM stated, as if it were established fact, that the person he was talking about had attempted witness tampering, extortion, and solicitation of murder. That's libel if it's not true. Yet the claim doesn't square with the fact that the person was never charged on such grounds, and the drug charges were eventually dismissed. I don't think murder-for-hire, extortion, or witness tampering would be treated so lightly by federal and state prosecutors; in one sentence JVM claims that the plot was uncovered during the trial and just a couple of diffs later he claims that he was involved in arranging a deal resulting in only a permanent injunction against selling peyote. Can you blame me if I find this farfetched? Aren't such falsehoods disruptive to WP? Your comment that his edits related to LDS articles are ""no more POV than the average LDS editor's contributions"" is mind-boggling to me. Your opinion of LDS people must be very poor indeed if that's the case, and it makes me wonder if I'm not swimming upstream here in trying to raise concerns about JVM. Do you mistrust my motives because I'm LDS? Would you be as forgiving of JVM's behavior if he were creating articles on ""Anglican teachings about extraterrestrial life"" or ""Orthodox Jew men in black""? I've approached you with my concerns because you're just ze guy who unblocked JVM, you know? But now it seems like you're inclined to assume bad faith on my part, on little more basis than my religion, and granting JVM the benefit of the doubt despite his lengthy history of bad behavior, threats, disruption, and fanciful claims. I'm absolutely confident your motives are unimpeachable, but do you think you've been consistent in your approach to our conflict? Maybe you think I'm out to troll JVM or something... is that it? I am not attacking JVM personally, just trying to combat his disruptive behavior. Meanwhile, he posts stuff like this. He immediately deleted it, but really, come on now. How much more goodwill does he deserve? /talk/ " +I'd like someone to please give some advice about this, because if I add this information to the article I'm not sure where it should go. +" June 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Antarctic Circle, you will be blocked from editing. 222* ""As cool as grapes..."" If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." +" Napoleon Zervas Dear Helladios can you stop deleting my input. You have no right to censore someone elses opinion. You are not God. Napoleon Zervas his behaviour was questionable and important for the prosecution of the cham albanians ""Zervas was forced to resign in 1947, when details of his contacts with the German occupation authorities surfaced"" This quote came from Wikepedia's biography of Napoleon Zervas. Other sites are more explicit and call him a Nazi collaborateur. Nowadays there are still a lot of greek people that believe that the Cham people were expelled because they collaborated with the Nazi's. However it was Zervas thet collaborated with the Nazi's that expelled them. Shouldn't this be more explicit in this article. There is a UN resolution which asks the Greek government to repatriate the cham and to give back there properties.The rest of this article is lame. I miss the following: Copyright © 2006 Illyrians.org. During the Conference of Ambassadors in London in 1913, the southern part of the region was cut off from the motherland and annexed to the Greek state despite the fact that people of the southern Epirus were Albanians of Orthodox and the Muslim faith. While the orthodox Albanians were targets of hellenization, the muslim Albanians were either exterminated or expelled from their ancestral lands by the Greek government. Chams who lived in Southern Epirus (Chameria or Thesprotia as it is called by the Greeks) were the victims of the first ethnic cleansing in Europe at the end of the Second World War. The Cham tragedy is one of the most painful tragedies of the European continent. Statistical yearbook of the Greek government in 1936 showed that 26.000 Chams lived in Chameria region in Greece at that time. As a result of the 1944-1945 ethnic cleansing and genocide, 30.000 Albanian Muslims were violently expelled from the Chameria region, and sought refuge in the Republic of Albania, where they still live. Today, there are 150.000 members of this population in Albania, a figure that has grown because of the high birth rate of the population. On the other hand, current number of Cham Albanians living in Greece is estimated at around 100.000. Yet these people are deprived of every sort of minority rights like other minorities living in Greece. To cite but one example, they can speak Albanian only in their homes. The population of Chameria has always been ethnically Albanian: - A lot of voyagers and foreign historians wrote that Chameria had been populated by Albanians. Even the Greek historian Herodotus underscored this fact in his book Historias and called Albanians of the Chameria barbarians, a term used by the ancient Greeks to distinguish non-greek people. - The census held by the Turkish Administration in 1910 established that there were 83.000 orthodox and muslim Albanians in the region. The demographic map of the British military mission sent to the British government in London indicates that on the eve of the second World War, 75% of Chameria's population was Albanian. - The pro-Greek historian Spiro Muselimi, in his book ""Historical Sight Through Thesprotia"", edited in Joannina on 1974, wrote that ""The bishop of Thesprotia in the year 1870 translated some parts of Bible into Albanian, as the people of orthodox faith of the region did not understand any word in Greek"" . The Greek authorities, sticking to the concept of absolute denial of the existence of ethnic groups on Greek territory, have followed a well-established chauvinistic policy and, as history recorded, they committed genocide against the Albanians of muslim faith. The racial assault on Chameria's muslim Albanians began to be first applied at the end of the Second World War, in 1944-1945, when criminal bands of the notorious General Napoleon Zervas perpetrated ethnic cleansing against them. On June 27, 1944, Greek criminal bands resorted to the worst atrocities witnessed in this region. The terror committed against this population was beyond description. It included killings, rapes, inhuman treatment, massacre of women, babies and pregnant women. More than 1400 men, women and children were killed within 24 hours in the town of Paramithy, on Tuesday, June 27, 1944, which happened to be the date of St.Bartholomeus day for the whole Chameria. During the June 1944-March 1945 period, 1286 persons were killed in Filat, 192 people were killed in Gumenica, 626 persons were killed in Margellic and Parga. There were hundreds of other missing persons. In the same period, as a result of Greek massacres, acts of robbery and rapes against the Albanian population of Chameria; 2900 young and old men, 214 women, 96 children were massacred, 745 women were raped, 76 women abducted, 32 children, younger than 3 years were massacred, 68 villages were razed to the ground, 5800 houses a +Thanks for your opinion. User StaticVapor, please leave your opinion, you was who disagreed without explication to add countries charts. +" Re: Image Everything you need to know is in your welcome message. - Shadow " +He likely thinks that you're an idiot, which you are. +Maybe this article could be merged with ecozone one, or at least, they should both refer to one another. +It'll be pretty simple, really. I'll get to it tomorrow. You really need to keep the 1993 allegations paired down, because much of the information provided was really skewed in favor of Jackson, creating neutral POV problems. Keep it to the most basic facts; public reaction was the most important part of the controversy anyway. +czechofile is worse than a pedophile czechofile is worse than a pedophile. +Good job really, as you're obviously an idiot. +Other than more than my share of the recently deceased, I allow new articles to take me to where there are holes. The Pork campaign has been widely promoted, and I even heard a report about the Pork Board's response to the effects of the Swine Flu on pork sales (bottom line is there is no connection in US). This article led me to another ad exec, which may mean articles for other ad campaigns, and then I'll move on to whatever catches my fancy and wherever there are holes to be filled. +" Wait, You are threatening me with WP:CIVIL less than 2 hours after telling me to ""eat shit""? " +" GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written? A. Prose quality: B. MoS compliance: Is it factually accurate and verifiable? A. References to sources: B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage? A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail: Yup, looks fine for GA now.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld " +I have no idea how to upload pictures, sorry. I do have a few pictures though. What kind of one would be suitable? +" Shouldn't there be at least one reference for: ""Kimberlin's conviction was challenged by former Solicitor General and Harvard Law School Dean Erwin Griswold on the basis of a wrongful conviction due to the improper use of hypnosis on six witnesses by police officers who failed to follow any protocols. Once Griswold secured his release, Kimberlin sued the Department of Justice under Bivens for violating his constitutional rights and false imprisonment which was settled in his favor."" ??? I have not found one and it was entered by someone, Kurtmilk, who accused me of being a stalker. Anyway, a thought. " +" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.10.232.126 08:16, 5 December 2013‎" +HOW'S THIS: Awfully sorry to disagree with you old chum, i have the upmost repect for you and your absurd opinions, nice weather we're having, is that a new tie? it matches your eyes. I apologise profusely for disagreeing with you (awfully sorry for the spelling, comrade) But i fel the need to express an opinion to the effect of: YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN AND A FRIEND OF DWAIN'S. I AM AN ATHEIST AND AN ENEMY OF DWAINS. ABORTION IS GOOD. ABORTION IS GREAT. THE POPE IS A BASTARD. BUSH IS A DICK. CATHOLICISM IS FAKE. YOU ARE A CATHOLIC. I AM A SOCIALIST. Once again, very sorry. Sorry if capitals seem frightening. How's the wife. +Oh, and the rifle I used when I was in the Basij of Isfahan. The rifle was so powerful, I couldnt hold it properly. I was fucking 13. And nobody sent me there. When you see Iraqi war planes fucking your town and home, defending your own people doesnt understand the meaning of age. +" October 2007 Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Your report of me should go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Just a reminder Talk Let's go Lightning! " +REDIRECT Talk:Let's Hear It for the Boy (song) +" You didn't, you thought I was the disgusting one, but I will assume good faith and put it down to confusion. Did you see the homophobic user box about marriage? talk " +" Re: Request Khoikhoi wrote: Come back! -( khoi Er... my last edit was some 49 minutes previous. I have no intention of ""going"" anywhere. If this is about IRC, I've decided that continuing to use it would be going against my whole attitude towards this project – to focus on low-level maintenance and avoid becoming involved in disputes, no matter what – " +"Hi there, thanks for leaving me a message. Thanks also for the image! I always meant to drive by and take a few, but it keeps slipping my mind. ) Kennedy (talk) Oh! Here's your bog-standard templated welcome message! Enjoy! Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kennedy (talk) " +" ""Sirius"" addendum I think that this entire little part of the article should be considered for deletion or revision. It's obviously someone who professes New Age beliefs trying to argue for the Dogons being contacted by extraterrestrials. While most people with any or no science background think stuff like this is bunk, we're on Wikipedia here, so maybe could we just make sure it's mentioned somewhere in this or another article that certain religions believe ""the following"". Not only all this, but this ""Sirius"" addendum is not very continuous with the thought stream of the rest of the article. You'd think because I do lots of work on a fictional language called ""Atlantean"" that I'd have more leniency for such causes. Think again. This alien-astronaught business is merely a figment of modern imagination and literature. " +" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! " +Blindly pushing article to GA status creates museum pieces far removed from reality. Anyway +, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Does seem quite recursive. Although to be honest, I should point out that I don't really think the case for listing him as a companion to begin with is particularly strong which may prejudice my views. 17:44 +That is correct. Many, even most, of the Tibetan Buddhist mantras are originally derived from Sanskrit, but certainly not all. I think there has been some evidence published by John Reynolds that the original language of Dzogchen may have been Farsi. +Me too. You insist on extending the personal attacks and piling-on the unpleasant behaviour. I guess it takes all kinds. +. Wikid77 is also looking to tighten the info box borders as well too. He had created the code specific for us here in Wales for the info box border color +(and the natives are still persecuted by the government) +" Hi, Boondock, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. TAB Additional tips TABTAB Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia! If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.TAB You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. You may want to add yourself to the new user log.TAB If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — talk contribs PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian. Click here to respond to this message!" +Ah, a suggestion and a request for debate to remove great Britain from the great power list has been met with wild accusations, personal opinions and unwanted comments. What's happening? Is this what the admins were calling as constructive discussion and for which they blocked me. Brilliant. +The issue is a man withholding a get from a woman. As you might understand it is the man who must make the request for a get to the Bet Din. In the case of Bruker, the man was in violation of a judgment in 1980 which ordered him to appear before Rabbinical Authorities. If you look at the Greenberg article, he is absolutely opposed to the Court of Appeals judgment because Courts to date in other jurisdictions have ordered specific performance. Look at the Brett Case. This is why the Supreme Court case issue is the justiciability of a contract with religious overtones. Look at the CCLA case. The facts of the case that Ms. Bruker was able to conceive are important in terms of damages. The facts of the marriage have no import because the 1980 judgement which Mr. Marcovitz violated are after the marriage. And Ms. Bruker if you read some of the press has never stated that she was an Orthodox Jewess but Conservative. Again the issue of specific performance is related to ordering someone to do something that may be against his conscience. This conscience issue is also more often than not used as an excuse for violating an agreement. And with the word conflict, it is inappropriate because it does not describe the issue. It should be the conflict between religious law and the doctrine of separation of church and state. +p.s. for the record, here are today's changes, against the current TOC is Intro (rewritten ) 1 Writing a φ-base number in standard form (original, maybe minor edits) 2 Representing integers as Golden mean base numbers (no change) 2.1 Non-uniqueness (new) 3 Representing Rationals as Golden mean base numbers (new - what got me started) 4 Addition, subtraction, multiplication (rewritten) 4.1 Calculate then convert to standard form (was old section 4) 4.2 Avoiding digits other than 0 and 1 (a new point of view) 5 Division (rewritten) 6 A Close relation: Fibonacci Representation (new) 7 External Links (orig) +As Justin is pro-Sahrawi, I'll invite him here and I think he can comferm everything I'm about to tell you. That article's scope is Western Sahara, not just the SADR, it's simply mis-titled, note that it also includes the Spanish Sahara CoA. See the first two paragraphs of my 18 March post at wp:NPOV Noticeboard#Flag_and_Coat_of_arms_of_Western_Sahara_.2F_SADR, and Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move.3F. In sort tough: During the flag/CoA merges, with CoA articles it was the WS article that was merged into the SADR one, as the SADR article contained nearly all the significant edit history. It was given a WS title via a Technical move request. Someone (not going to unnecessarily publicize his name) has been trying to unilaterally re-split the articles, even tough he's the only one who thinks that should be done and everyone else who has an opinion thinks that there should be one article. He had the Technical move of the merged article undone, on the procedural baces that he objected to it, as a prelude to atemping to unilaterally split the article against conciseness. His split was undone by Dzlinker and myself, hence the poor title which doesn't match the scope. If on the other hand you think the article gives the Moroccan regional CoA's too much WP:WEIGHT or somthing, that's another matter, and you could discuss it at the NPOV Noticeboard, or maybe the article talk page. +. You have to know how to spell the words before you post +" P.S. Also, you say, Hi. ""I saw the copyright question that you put in your edit summary. Generally, edit summaries can be missed. It's best to ask them on your talk page."" I am sorry to be so stupid, but I do not know what you mean by this. Can you explain ? How do I put it on my talk page? THANKS ! )" +" Hi Frutsel, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. " +I have dreadly understood my mistake [User:Qwyrxian] I hear by wont make any racial comment against anyone. And wont interrupt in an argument with other Authors. About sockpuppetry i have no clue about it, I use a public source of internet at my college campus. So hopefully you may consider this as a last mistake and unblock the account. +===his career would be over. 68.0.119.139 +So the article couldn't use any of it? 208.54.90.141 +December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your comment on my talk page. However, my efforts are insignificant compared to yours and 's! 23:04, 19 +My bad.69.243.42.251 +Re E Pluribus Anthony Hi there - thanks for your help and interest on Template_talk:Regions_of_the_world. I haven't replied to the latest comments because I suspect that ... User:A the 0th [is a] sockpuppet... This has now been confirmed - he is a sockpuppet. Thanks for your message, Andeggs. It's disappointing to discover +Changes I have corrected this article. It stated that the Court ordering that Mr. Englaro claim stood and therefore Eluana therapy should be interrupted was the Constitutional Court. Actually, it was the Supreme Court of Cassation to deliver that sentence. +}} {{citation|url=http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/who/secretary.htm|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20010321014745/http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/who/secretary.htm|title=Dr David Rosalky|publisher=Department of Family and Community Services|archivedate=21 March 2001|date= 6 February 2001 +Countries I'm curious here, why is special interest given to N.America and especially Australia & NZ?128.240.229.3 +If Askolnick continues and it comes to a complaint then I will read the instructions on how to post one and follow it. For the time being the point is clear: I will no longer put up with the barrage of personal attacks that accompany virtually every post on the CSICOP talk page (and latterly on my own talk page). Should it continue I will make a formal complaint. Anyone interested in the context in the meantime can go to the CSICOP talk page and use the Ctrl+f search facility to find the relevant comments. +" Having said that, there is one: Category:WikiProject banners. (talk | contribs) " +Please continue editing. Don't mind me. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. +Thanks heaps for looking after this for me, I really appreciate it. ) +It is not a forgery, just fiction. The two are very different things. +Get a life DMAcks you are the most obnoxiuos person that has ever had the grace to be a wiki editor. why dont you do the world a favour and stop your one man's war on anybody who wnat to edit a wiki page you sanctamonius person? +" The reason another admin stated for my last block (that Dicklyon brought upon me last weekend, for 48 hrs), was also edit war. However, it was only me who got blocked that time. In my complaint I requested that BOTH parties be punished because a war involves two or more parties, but my request for DENIED. Now you are saying I got a 24 hrs block because a war takes two parties? How ridiculous is this! As far as other 24 hrs are concerned, where did I insult Dicklyon personally? I talked about his worthless edits, not him, and I have all right to talk about his edits because it was the page I wrote that has been featured on WP main page; he is just a trouble maker – see his Talk page to see how many enemies he has created, besides a few personal buddies of his like SamBlacketer who lies on your Talk page about ""many editors"" who have blocked me (it was Dicklyon actually) and calls my WP featured article a fringe theory how can he tell if he admits having no clue about the article topic in the first place? As far as the dispute resolve, all my reasons are stated right on the article Discussion so I am not hiding anything. People can say what they think of Dicklyon's misuse of WP regulations on the article Talk page directly. So far no one would do it. I guess the infamous ""many editors"" include one or two close buddies of Dicklyon tops. " +" 1. P.121 does not contain any mention of ""33 million"". You should be banned from Wilipedia for making up numbers and putting them in articles. 2. You were already blocked for posting in gun control articles. You are violating that topic block. Get out, and please do not place false statistics in articles in the future." +How to request protection on Commons I am curious as to how protection can be requested on subpages of a specific user...specifically, a page, such as subpage on the User profile that should only be modified by the user or an admin. If you could let me know, that would be appreciated. +id imagine, but it needs a source +" Removing Wikilinks Stop doing it. talk to me " +":I pronounce it WMATA all the time. 04:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) For a short time, announcements over the public address system would prounounce ""WMATA"" to sound like ""Ramada,"" and then only when referring to the website, wmata.com. This practice stopped thankfully when they obtained the metroopensdoors.com domain. Perhaps this happened because unless you knew that Metro was operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, you'd have no idea how to spell ""WMATA."" (Womatta? Wamada?) ( 29 June 2005 21:07 (UTC)) " +Wikipedia:Naming conventions (provinces) Maybe you can have a look at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (provinces). (Talk) 23:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) +i literally get banned for anything. The mods are plagiarizing bellenss who started the forum because they were kicked off TWG forum. To positive news NT qualifying rounds tomorrow. +Required notifications It looks like you forgot to notify the editors who you brought up at COIN. There's a template at the top of the noticeboard for this. +teen titans external links on this part of i put an external link to a website about teen titans and other but you keep getting rid of it any reasons??? signed anonomous +" That is definitely notable information. But, it does need a reliable source. Talk " +Misc Activities BETA Beta is a business academic program where a student must process an aplication if they are interested in the program. Those who are accepted are required to take at least 5 simesters of business classes. Which are Business Technology, Keyboarding, Virtual Enterprise, and Intro to Business. Debate Club Students compete with other schools debating about a topic (different topics are chosen every week) Fine Arts Academy Students are nominated to the Hoover High School Fine Arts Academy. Academy students are invited to take advanced classes at Hoover to create a Fine Arts Emphasis in their Degree Program. Students must take 3 years of Arts classes while enrolled at Hoover in order to be concidered an Academy graduate. Of these 3 Courses at least 2 must be at Hoover High School. Along with the academic distinction that comes with being an Academy student you will be eligible to participate in events at the Hoover Arts Gallery. +Thank you for experimenting with the page Battle of Bunker Hill on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 (chit chat) +Felt the other image was much too dark - liked the view but the lighting was horrible. +I think it is better to stay with tradition: let me decide if my concerns have been addressed (and personally strike them if so). +Adolph Hitler Please, do not do wrong reverts before using the talk page of the article. +, and keeping it in a subsection (so that the distinction between it and the rest of the article is clear) is best +Better for the wreath. Suffers again from composition in that the candles are cropped and one candle is obscured by the centre candle. The tree in the background is a very nice addition! It's also a bit small. +" So I will start with a criticism of the quote from Ollier and Pain, with whom I have more general issues than the ""postorogenic part"". Phrase by phrase that I disagree with: Only much later was it realized that the two processes [deformation and the creation of topography] were mostly not closely related, either in origin or in time. Very wrong. Deformation causes topography, and the generation of topography is synchronous with deformation. I will email you a copy of Dahlen and Suppe (1988), which shows that this is the case - send me a message so I have your address and can attach a PDF. They tackle the large-scale deformation of sedimentary rocks via folding and thrusting during orogenesis. ...fold-belt mountainous areas...: ""fold-belt"" isn't used professionally (AFAIK) to refer to a collisional mountain-building event. A minor thing though. Only in the very youngest, late Cenozoic mountains is there any evident causal relation between rock structure and surface landscape. and the following sentence: If I were British, I would call this ""utter twaddle"". As I mentioned above, there is no way for many of the exposed structures to get to the surface without large amounts of rock uplift and erosion. And as a matter of fact, the trajectory of different units of rock through an orogen is in part determined by patterns of surface erosion. To keep it simple and send you one paper, you'll find this in and at the end of the paper by Dahlen and Suppe (1988). " +"I WILL BE ALLOWED TO ANSWER THIS CHARGE...Clown, this the real JOE, and I never owned a red pickup truck, Considering you live on a very busy county road, you would get ""Red trucks"" roll by from time to time. Further more finding out who you are is very easy, since your have a very ""PUBLIC"" presence on the INTERNET and a google search on your name, beer, and Wilber yields the answer, The stalkers, you fret about, may be any one of your many, many fans who you have disrespected with all or nothing approach on religion and politics over the years. YOU should GROW UP and Learn there are other points of view out and learn to respect them. you seem not to have the ability, based on your long history on Wikipedia. You are truly small and delusional man. 68.255.4.250 " +Undeletion request The file is back. Thanks! +You would As I was saying before I was interrupted, you know you would. hands off! +Spoilsport. 19:42, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC) +" As far as I can tell there is no academic or media debate on whether or not 9/11 was a terrorist attack... it was. It's almost considered the terrorist attack. To say otherwise is really silly and flies in the face of what actual sources say. Nidhiki05 " +Errant is the admin who owns the article. +More to add I wonder following groups should be also listed, all have more than 10 million people and not majority in their countries. Gujaratis Oriya People Kannada People Biharis Telugu People Marathi People Cantonese People Hui People Hakka People Malayali +My motives I am writing an article for the Guardian. +OK, I'll watch the page for developments. Maybe I'll see somewhere I can be useful. +REVERSIONS Any particular reason you are reverting the wiklinks to the new page I created? Should the founder not be linked to their new pages??? +Hi Tim. The latest press release is from PR Newswire. You can find it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H1N1#2009__A.28H1N1.29_pandemic +POV pushing? It is actually those words their in the end that is POV pushing. This isnt nationalism or Armenian patriotism, since V.V. Ivanov and Tamaz Gamkrelidze are the ones that embraced the Armenian hypothesis with the Glottic theory. We also discussed together about the ancient records in the Bronze Age here -> Talk:Armens. Also there are Indo-European (Aryan) presence from ancient burial mounds, swastika symbols, and culture of the 3rd millenium BC Kuro-Araxes culture, which continued to another culture in 2nd millenium BC with Indo-European presence. In 2nd millenium BC Hayasa, etc etc tribes and states continue with Indo-European, with those records of the name clearly identify Armenians and Armenia. The name Armen or Arman which both Persians and Germans (other Indo-European Aryans) put also +=Sir I have edited this users content, but the user kept reverting I agree completely with your accusations, but you need to understand that this is why I have been requesting the blocks against the user Thegingerone in the first place.65.112.121.29 +A victory means the enemy was destroyed, in this case victory doesn't exist since Noriega was arrested. +George Washington I heard that mother fucker had like... 30 god damn dicks... +Replied here. — (talk · contribs) +" Probation violation Because your edit was an indisputably good edit, I chose not to report it on the arbitration enforcement board, but please be aware that according to the arbitration request you are ""subject to an editing restriction indefinitely. [You are] prohibited from editing any article that is substantially a biography of a living person."" Heather Mills is a living person. You are not permitted to edit her article. Beyond that, she is a controversial living person involved in a dramatic court case - the same kind of person your restriction was initially based on. Please refrain from editing these articles per the terms of your probation. Thanks. " +":::::::::: That's a pretty strained argument. I am using the Bible's POV only to argue that this is an article about a Biblical story, and that the views of those belief-systems that include the Bible, with many millions of followers around the world, do (believe it or not) actually have some relevance here... therefore it is what we call a ""significant"" view, and we cannot assert or imply that any of the significant views are either true or false, historical or fictional. Is that not clear enough? (ውይይት) " +" Just curious; I just realized the connection from your username recently!  (talk) " +I'm sorry, but this is en.Wiki, thus English is used here. It seems like you are confusing political parties, which can be parliamentary-only (as in the case of the FLD) or, for that matter, extra-parliamentary (there are even parties which don't participate in elections), with parliamentary groups/parties. I perfectly understand your point, but I still think there is a difference from the FLD and the other cases you mentioned. Finally, let me tell you once again that this is not the place for such a discussion; please use Talk:List of political parties in Italy or other talk pages. See you there, +" November 2006 (UTC) alright dude, but this grass hopper can't handle english this is why he started to speak in french. he don't get a damn thing but claims he can teach me how things works, see he started to call me ""UTC"" as he thought it was my name... what can i do with people like him? nothing i guess, there's nothing to do anymore. 22:51, 26" +Wow...thanks for letting us share your amazing insights!! I too also hope the Cantonese language will continue to be prestigious, dominant and prevalent amongst the Cantonese-speaking people!!! I didn't realise that the 1,000,000,000 (that's one billion for those who can't count:-) Chinese people who do not speak Cantonese are so eager to join Cantonese language classes just so that they can understand Hong Kong pop music and films in the authentic original language. Obviously, reading sub-titles or watching dubbed films, or listening to putonghua versions of Hong Kong pop music would just be so tiresome!! Also I suppose schools all across China are introducing Cantonese language classes, and that parents are making sure their children are going to be fluent in Cantonese, just for the sake of their future of course!! +" Turkey - Germany video breakdown Why is this not mentioned? A thunderstorm interrupted coverage worldwide. " +I guess its not worth arguing about anymore. I'll say that Saw IV had a different history than Rebirth's. +" I accept your opinion, eventhough you added salt to the wounds by deoting it from low importance to no importance. talk " +" PS: Virtually the entire body of the Hope article was in the intro, so I went over there and added some section headings to break it up.     talk  " +Yes it was Dick. The consensus was overwhelming to exclude non expert SPS's where expert was defined by academic credentials. i.e. being an invited editor. (By the by I have redacted your actual personal attack on my good faith which I have shown mountains of. You really should read WP:DICK it applies to you.) +Toyworld Cup & InterCity Cup As Sportspower cup has been deleted, should these 2 also not be deleted as they cover much the same area i.e. of very limited, local interest. +We should probably wait for RSN to bear that one out. Repeating something over and over does not make it consensus. +He makes it kinda obvious, doesn't he? '''' talk +"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" id=""talkheader"" align=""center"" style=""text-align:center;background-color: #FFFFFF;"" |- ! colspan=""2"" style=""border-bottom:1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA;"" | Welcome to 's talk page. |- | style=""background-color: #FFFFFF;text-align:left;"" | To leave me a message, click here. Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions. Do not remove comments from others. I strongly encourage free speech on my talk page, and I will not censor messages, no matter how offensive, unless they clearly impair the page's functionality. | style=""background-color: #FFFFFF;"" | Talk page guidelines Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice. " +" Oh, also, , will you please come and work your magic over at One Magnificent Morning? 75.162.179.246 " +" Formula One I'm having a little trouble squaring ""With respect"" with expressions like ""rubbish"" and ""pile of bollocks"". I am aware of the location of the former Stewart GP team, but their owners and entrant are Austrian. If your justification for the removal is, as you say, that ""national anthem isn't played for the team at the podium ceremony"" then there is no justification because that is quite simply wrong - the national anthem of the entrant is always played unless it is the same as that of the driver. " +But, they are confirmed? I strongly believe the show has gone out of production, no new episodes have been announced and the show is off the air on most (if not all) PBS stations. +Please stop being a penis— and Grow Up Regards- +Hello. Carlos Slim has the Lebanese nationality and speaks Arabic as his native tongue. He and his son visit Lebanon every few months. +": We need to be cautious in presenting a false balance. Same as with climate change, and other subjects, we need to rely on academic and mainstream economists views, rather than politicians, lobbyists, left-wing or right-wing media outlets. For the conservative and liberal views on the economy of the US we have the respective articles for that. - (talk) " +In regards to LCIstudent, and his blocking You are worthless Mr.Friday, and I didpise you. That is all for now. +Your opinion is required On the TGGWS talk page, see , is asserting ArbCom rulings do not set precedents. Since this obviously has implications for your argument regarding the ArbCom ruling on pseudo-science requiring peer-reviewed sources in science articles (when no official wikipedia policy includes such a requirement), I thought you might want to weigh in there. +" It has everything to do with what people ticked on the form. It says nothing about African Americans are only those with origins in Subsaharan Africa. Your link was a spreadsheet! The real definition is at this link. Look where it says ""A person whose origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa"". This is from the US CENSUS. Please read it. Although I did make a mistake and used a wrong link before, but I changed it to the one I post here.  Talk " +" November 2011 Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Griffith's experiment with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! (Contact me,Contribs) " +Cassevetes Yes sir Mr Dr K sir +May i also draw your attention to user:ciraric's talk page where he was very uncivil. +The reasons were provided on for each edits, many were plagiarized yet they are reverted anyway. Others employee fallacious logic. +As far as using that information for your project, we'll that's bot generated information, and while it is mostly reliable, it can't be completely accurate. +Wow Ya'll are smoking some crack then, eh? Stop leaving kinky messages in my talk page, ya sexually harassing bitchez. +Your message Hi Adrian. I hope you don't mind, I copied your message to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cornwall which is the most active talk page for the project - this way more people will see it! +Operation CWAL Thought you might be interested in seeing this: http://www.ghazporkindustrial.com/?P=maggottshow +I've linked it from this article, feel free to add it to [[Croatia]]. Perhaps the template {main} would be more convenient. +If you think your edit is justified, take it to talk and convince people. +Additional sources http://www.weekenda.it/it/weekend_allo_zoo_safari_fasanolandia.html http://www.parentdish.com/2010/03/24/preview-amusement-parks-2010/ http://www.ilgiornalino.org/numeri/1321gi/linviato-speciale.html http://www.parksmania.it/2011/08/01/fasanolandia-eurofighter-in-dirittura-darrivo/ http://www.gerstlauer-rides.de/references/reference-list/europe/italy/euro-fighter/ http://www.zoosafari.it/eurofigther/ http://books.google.com/books?ei=zDT1U92GC4e5ogT1hICYCg&id;=5EcsAQAAMAAJ&dq;=zoosafari+fasanolandia&focus;=searchwithinvolume&q;=euro +Thanks for nudging instead of poking—I was away for the weekend, then had some awful I-can't-get-out-of-bed virus, and have been slow catching up. Am writing a post for article talk; it will be up shortly. +So does the NPOV not apply to this page? +Replied I've replied at SPI. It's the ability to continue socking that has me perplexed, not the mechanics of him being able to access his talk page.— +" ""Professor Marvin H. Mills"" is a self-published crank. His book is printed by iUniverse, a vanity publishing company. Mills also believes that the mosques in Spain were built by Phoenicians aided by survivors from Atlantis We learn of the ""Piri Reis map"" that ""It lead Ivar Zapp and George Erikson in Atlantis in America (1998) to assert that an awareness of Antartica was known to an advanced civilization at the end of the Ice Age."" And, yes, the published version of this book really does spell the second word of that sentence with an ""a"". Mills is not a reliable source. He is self-published and his views are fringe. " +" More than One Buddha In the Wikipedia Buddha article, it is explained that Gautama Siddhartha was not the only buddha. On the contrary, the name is given to anyone who has become enlightened or ""awakened"" to the principles of the religion. Users Vapour and lg0774 should note that this might even apply to Western philosophers. Lestrade" +A rationale was added in the last few days so this problem should be solved. +yoo should add Category:Animals +Leave my talk page alone If you're leaving a message, fine. If you're being a flunky of DakotaKhan, stay off my talk page. +Actually, that's gone now; you're the only one naming him now. ∇∆∇∆ +when it's a reporters self-written bio +Yes, there was a small mistake in derivation. It should have been instead of . It should be ok now. +I suspect the 'Lake District' has never had a boundary and simply been a pointer to the area in general. I also feel that the 'Lake District' doesn't actually physically exist and has only developed more defined boundaries through the creation of the National Park. I would therefore support the merge of the 'Lake District' into the 'Lake District National Park' rather than the other way around. 81.141.47.169 +All wikia blocks User Sannse blocked from editing on all wikis, can you unblock me. I don't want to wait 16 days, 384 hours to edit again, that's a long time and i want to edit on my wiki again, Memory Delta wiki.98.236.110.176 +" About Niemti You might not understand this sir, but he didn't come there to give his opinion but he actually ca,e there to annoy me. You even read what he said. An article can't just be deleted because it has very low amount of references. Calling him a ""bully"" was no personal attack but I was actually telling other people the truth about him. I have nothing against you or others my friend. I only don't like Niemti because of the way he talk with people and his utter rudeness plus those blocking warnings about edit warring he gave me. I already had told him that I do not know many of the policies of Wikipedia and if I committed a mistake it was not at all intentional. Instead of removing the warning he gave me another warning without any reason just because i removed the earlier warning as it was without any proper reason. And when I asked the administrators to ban him because of his improper behaviour they instead warned to block me cause of a single personal attack. What am I make of this? Tell me. Should i keep getting bullied by him and say nothing!! And then be accused of indiscipline and throwing tantrums. Why? Just because I'm a newbie!!? " +This article is a vile, pathetic(not unlike the modern Chinese nation, mind you) attempt at history. Show the monster for what it(he) was- the man who created more damage than anyone else ever did to human history, culture, and beings!== == +" The price of $499 is trivial. I don't think the article even needs to state that faculty must pay to use its facilities, but the price tag definitely doesn't belong. Ω Janner " +" Cruft in trivia section A backstage segment featuring dancing is certainly fancruft that doesn't belong. It being a reunion of sorts (and it being at WM) doesn't make it any more notable at all. The dance segment didn't affect any of the matches and certainly doesn't help the article. I suggest moving to the notes section. 3:16 It's always been in the notes section, that's not the problem here. The problem is: it's a backstage segment. Backstage segments aren't notable, and don't affect the matches or anything... why add this one over others? Just because it was a reunion isn't a good enough reason in my opinion. People certainly could argue the Boogey Man/Trump segment was notable, as it featured the first time the 2 had interaction (or just on the fact Trump appeared). It's fancruft and serves no purpose except that some people might think it's ""interesting"". That's not enough to keep it on the article. Oh I didn't see that. Hmmm... let me see what I can do with it... 3:16 I think that we should just add them to the other talent section if they aren't there already and not mention the dance. It was pretty pointless, and doesn't seem necessary. Peace, The rid While I agree that the Boogeyman segment wasn't notable, this segment had the return of Slick (first time in like 15 years) and a bunch of other WWE legends. It being a reunion and at WM does help its case IMO (especially the reunion part). You are saying being a backstage segment is the problem, so you wouldn't be objecting if they had done this on the stage or in the ring? If we mentioned them in the on screen talent section, what would we put down for them so someone else doesn't remove it. It also got covered in most reviews and coverage of the event (coevering the notability part). Being cruft is an opinion; being a reunion featuring over a dozen legends and covered by almost every review makes it worth at least mentioning. Eh, the return of Slick is pretty important. I'll change my vote to Weak Support, as I had forgotten about that point. Peace, The rid Covered in almost every review? I find that very hard to believe. Provide some proof. Also: so what if it's covered? The matches are reviewed in the reviews as well: that doesn't mean we will start listing highlights for each match. I also recall there being a guideline on Wikipedia about it not being a democracy: meaning not everything should be determined by a vote. I somehow think if this fancruft was gone: no one would be re-adding except for TJ. From the edit history: it seems like he was the only one re-adding it back. That certainly shows that people don't care about it. A few talk page posts in favor of it: isn't much consensus to keep it on the article. and among others. Other people have added it back, I just get to it first usually. Considering OWW is a fansite, only the Slam link is reliable. Anyone can write a review and mention it: fansites aren't a reliable source. I've seen no edit history of anyone else re-adding it back, so I'm still going to believe no one else has (until I see otherwise). If I need to bring an admin into this, I will. Because in my opinion: it's a content dispute between me and TJ, as no one else seems to care much about ONE LITTLE crufty thing. Slick returned for ONE appearance, post it on the Slick article and leave it at that. I could find more if I tried, that was in a quick 1 minute search. I could flip it and say only you think it should be removed. I don't see the big deal. It's not cruft, it's notable (based on what counts as being notable), an +Eliezer here is a copy of my email to JDwolf: By the grace of G-d Shalom uBrocha! Jfdwolff I didn't threaten to mailbomb Eliezer. Reread what said. I offerd to write a sarirical article similar to Just Say no to Terrorism on my popular website donkeymoshiach.blogspot.com dedicated to Elizer's Rebbe and is faithful emisaries And to put his email adress in the article so other Chassidim of Yudel can email him and give him much needed [[c hizuk]] If that's mailbombing threat in that case [http://donkeymoshiach.blogspot.com/2005/04/who-is-amazing-donkey-moshiach.html Yudel is not a donkey] As a side note your ban is totaly useless waste of time. You should better rescind it and ban Eliezer instead for mercilesly deleting other POVs than his own over extanded peri od of time. I bet If I were to delete theRebbe.org because like Chabad.org it's a part of the same corrupt PR structure called Chabad Media Center he would scream bloody murder,yet he had hutzpah to delete Chabad.am because it's a devision of Lubavitch Networks and leave 1 single mashichist site in the whole external links section of both Chabadand Menachem Mendel Schneerson articles specificly to downplay the internet visibility of Mashichistim. With respect and blessing. [http://www.torah.5u.com/aboutme.html Ariel Sokolovsky] Long Live our Master our Teacher and our Rebbe King Moshiach Forever and Ever! +The Kurdish People is a Irania People, The Kurdish language is a Irania language. +" In addition, it is not acceptable to call other editors names. On the grand scale of names, ""Twit"" is rather mild. But it is still not acceptable. People on Wikipedia have to be able to work together. And name calling of any degree is totally contrary to an atmosphere conducive of such communication. So I strongly recommend that you refrain from any further name-called of your fellow editors. - " +" Seriously, what is your problem? Do you think the paragraph deletion and the insertion of the word ""nipples"" was correct? Are you just too lazy to type anything? Or, are you just an asshole who doesn't really care about vandalism? " +"Actually, what you've written there makes sense. I can see your point, for the two paragraphs above. And so I don't have much else to say. It's a shame that somebody that knows nothing about the show and comes to Wikipedia looking for info about ""Top Gear"", won't learn what anybody that saw the race to Monaco saw, but that's life. You're right, Photoshop or whatever, the speedodmeters could be faked as evidence in here. If I could find a downloaded-able version of that race directly from the BBC site, then that would be valid proof too, I guess ... but I doubt I'll ever find anything like that. So... thanks for your clearly written comments. " +REDIRECT Talk:Grand Theft Auto: The Lost and Damned +Santa Catalina Island Santa Catalina Island off California is famous for flying fish and should be mentioned. Flying fish are mentioned in the Wikipedia article about Catalina, so it makes sense to include that species in this article. They are a big part of the tourist business there, so arguably are more important to Catalina than they are to Barbados. +Notable Contributions Chuck Norris invented the internet. Chuck Norris founded the United States of America, and later carved Mount Rushmoore with a single roundhouse kick. Chuck Norris went back in time and scared away the British during the American Revolution. Chuck Norris has broken the land speed record with his right foot. Twice. The chief export of the US is Chuck Norris. The chief export of Chuck Norris is pain. US troops cannot find Osama bin Ladin because Chuck Norris roundhouse kicked him and he disintegrated. The Grand Canyon was formed by Chuck Norris' pee. Mount Everest is actually one of Chuck Norris' frozen, snow-covered piles of crap. +I have long found this reference useful, but it now seems to be under attack for not conforming to Wikipedia's norms. I think new content added will struggle to conform to such, and this reference is far less useful if incomplete. Hence, I would advocate for option 4 directly, before any more gets chopped up and people get frustrated with Wikipedia, moreover waste their efforts in a futile attempt to satisfy the rules. Wikipedia doesn't seem to really want this kind of content, and there are other, stable Wiki's that do. +yeah at least i'm not a homo ROFL (btw this is your mother) ~EVIL MONKEY'S MOTHER +Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. zzuuzz (talk) +Hearing no justification for keeping it, I removed the category today. +" Chris, as someone who told me to shut up, you are in no position to issue a ""last warning"". You are now personally involved in the matter, and it would be abuse of your admin. powers to block me. If I am to be blocked, make sure you contact an admin. uninvolved in the ADERANT debacle. Thanks and have a nice day, despite our minor tiff. " +My explanations are not meant to 'conflict', they are truly meant to inform. I cannot understand why this is so hard to discern. +I always thought it was a symbol created by ancient Egyptians. It would make sense in a society that emphasized the daily death and rebirth of the sun. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020709.html? +Deletion threats; not ban== Sorry, you're right. I misremembered the exact nature of your unsavory threats to pull rank. The article is indeed much improved with a number of glaring errors corrected. == +" True, true... 'Guess I got a bit too used to how they use the name of the group as is for the individuals in Japanese... So how do we handle that one? ""Orochi Hakketsu Clan""/""member of the Orochi Hakketsu Clan""? Or do we keep ""Orochi Hakketsushū""/""member of the Hakketsushū?""? 88.161.129.43 " +What happens if, as I suspect, they don't bother to use the talk page? +1991, look up August 27 & then tell me what day it is, stupid! +"Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. guy " +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Awesome. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " +" WP:COI concerns and solutions for this article User:Lordradish asked a question about my possible conflict of interest - WP:COI. First, always look at Wikipedia policies if you think there is an issue, don't just go away angry. I know that I'm still learning Wikipedia policies and just reading the above I can see that in 2007-2008 period I was somewhat confused about a couple of them. The longer you are here, the more sensitive you become to all of them through experience. Re: COI questions, usually its better to start that on a talk page per WP: ""The first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline."" Actually, I thought this issue explicitly had been dealt with here before, but reading through I see I evidently confused it with a related COI question elsewhere. Anyway, I'll respond in interest of full disclosure, outline questions I think have to be asked on the talk page of any editor here who gives any indication of being familiar with the issue, and suggest some possible ways of dealing with WP:COI issues here. My possible WP:COI To answer Lordradish's question, I have contributed 43 blog entries to the secessionist blog Vermont Commons over the last 38 months. I have not been paid. My blog entries have been more generally related to the topic of secession and occasionally make passing references to Vermont and its secession issues, including in comments on others' entries. I don’t live in Vermont and don't intend to. I don't consider myself a member of any Vermont Secession group. As far as I remember, I only have corresponded with the Vermont Commons editor, and that by email. I get some irregular Vermont Commons email and mailings and occasional Second Vermont Republic snail mails. I also have suffered a couple years of vicious and even libelous off wiki attacks from the anonymous blogger who does vermontsecession.blogspot, including because I edited this page, and including at another blogspot page he set up just to ridicule me with incredible sexist ire. Therefore I have come to know far more about what types of individuals may be making very POV and COI edits to this article than I would have otherwise. I do feel I have sufficient COI to make sure I declare it, as I now have, and to be very careful of my edits per WP:COI#Editors_who_may_have_a_conflict_of_interest. Possible WP:COI of other editors In the 2007-2008 period there was some extreme POV editing of this article by individuals who I believe had very strong personal and financial connections to Vermont organizations and individuals, far stronger than mine. They are strongly motivated to trash or downplay the significance of Second Vermont Republic and don't care much about Wikipedia policies. Therefore here are some questions that might have to be asked on such suspected persons' talk pages (or here, but guidance on that appreciated). And I hope it’s ok to outline these general questions given the track record of this particular article. General questions include: are you the anonymous blogger who does vermontsecession.blogspot.com which, while using some information from reliable sources, has a track record of unrelenting nasty, exaggerated and unprofessional attacks on individuals, often with little or even contrary evidence presented; is that person a close personal associate?; do you work for or with that person in some other capacity, such as at a publication or a blog or a sometimes paid campaign staffer?; are you a Democratic or Republican Party activist or contractor or potential contractor who fears that secession candidates running in 2012 might take votes away from Democratic Party candidates and throw the election to a Republican. (According to official returns the candidate Pete Garritano mentioned in th is article got 3.7% of the returns, something not yet in the article.) Depending on whether a candidate was a more right or left winging secessionist, such a 2012 candidate could away enough votes to sway an election to the opponent of someone support by the editor. If other editors who seem to be too pro-Vermont Secession arise, obviously relevant questions could be asked of them on their talk page or here. Dealing with special WP:COI concerns of this article Given the problems described above, I can think of possible solutions: I am going to ask some neutral editors - those who have not been active opining on the secession topic or me - to look at this section and opine. If Wikipedia:Pending changes is implemented, this article may need to be put on the list. In the interim, any time individuals who may have COIs make questionable edits, perhaps a trul +" StanZegel writes to CTSWyneken: ""An anonymous editor is like a sniper in a tree top, taking pot shots at those trying to do serious work on the ground, and dropping his waste matter into the work in progress. I'm not sure that anything such a person attempts to add is worth verifying but should be summarily deleted on the basis that a responsible person would identify himself. If the material is truly worthy, a responsible scholar will get around to adding it. In the present case, I believe we are dealing with a sock puppet for an editor who has been banned previously for similar activity and may be on probation right now. If so, that probation is being violated, and keeping his edits or wasting time on his ""contributions"" simply enables continuing violations. (talk) ""- " +I live in a boarding house with thirty other down-on-their-luck men and I own one of the only laptop computers in the building. On a typical day, I have multiple people sharing this IP on my computer throughout the day, including some folks with extensive criminal histories and/or severe mental illnesses. But I wouldn't expect to be held liable for anything they do on my machine, now, that would be not fair. Eddits Why did you revert the eddits man? +]] who also supports [[white nationalism +Help me learn English This section is where people can tell me about any English mistakes that I may have made on Wikipedia and help me learn English in general. You don't have to know nor to explain all the grammar rules behind my mistakes, just telling me about them already helps a lot. Thanks for your input! +The size of the Ukraine army will increase significantly, with plans calling for the addition of 40,000 enlisted personnel and 10,500 contract military. “Army numbers have increased. Right now they are at 232,000 military as compared to 130,000 last year. They will increase to 250,00 people,” he said. +REDIRECT User talk:Thomas Larsen/archive 14 +I want my page staying clean - if you dont like that, then ban me. +, 6 March 2007 (UTC) The Talk page for the infobox contains lots of discussion related to the development of the infobox, who it should be applied to, and what terms should be used. As the infobox then was being applied all eligible articles, Akradecki objected to Shane and Siebold, apparently based on his personal opinion as to who should be classified as an astronaut. He posted his opionion on Talk:Astronaut. I responded and he, I and one other editor engaged in a non-conclusive discussion. 15:40 +Sunil M Pathare Can I have details on subneting in simple wording +I didn't think it was too bad, certainly not as bad as it would be if the PRC had gotten a hold on it, but I did make some changes to make it less pushy and to mention the strategic ambiguity policy. +[outdent] I have no objection to deleting V.s name on the subhead, & agree that I prob. shouldn't have used it. Apologies. So let's not get distracted from the content. V., do you agree this bit is in the wrong place here? If so, might be best for peace for you to move it, You do seem to be putting a lot of stuff in the lede which isn't (yet) in the main article. Bst, +" If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please create an account and log inDue to persistent vandalism (), editing by anonymous users from your school, library or institution's IP address currently disabled. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this address is probably also disabled.If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address with your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please ensure that any username you choose is not listed as taken here.Thank you. " +" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  PS: In the future, you can redirect a page by replacing it with ""#REDIRECT [[article name]]"". RB72 " +did you read ANYTHING I wrote above? never mind steven king or being famous (I'm not, he is, and yes, I knew about the Steven King thing already that is irrelevant here though). never mind all that, Ellin Beltz, as far as I can tell, you assisted in a misguided witchhunt against me after I clearly politely asked for your *Assistance*. how is that anything but wrong. you should be nice to me and read my reply to your erroneous vote and reconsider your hasty opinion that carries much oo much weight for something you were just dropped in on two minutes ago and you decided to come across like the expert (who apparently d9sclaimers their expertise saying 'now I'm no expert' then proceeding to act like one. So, tell me, I BEG, Where am I wrong or mischaracterizing your behavior with regard to the DD AFD? Nowhere. You were wrong on each and every count (though some good points inevitably slip thru any time someone opens their mouth) +keep up the good work Jim. The problem is this article is constantly being sabotaged by so called do-gooders, students and those trying to make Plymouth University more important than it is. Drake Circus is the shopping centre - period - no one cares about a few old buildings or the university. What matters is that people can enjoy shopping in a safe, modern and warm environment and at Drake Circus we offer a new level of customer service. +" Now I still think you are doo doo. Yes, doo doo indeed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.62.67 Why you no like me? Turd." +"Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW, nice additions and copyedits. I did go ahead and ""wikify"" a couple of your new entries for you so that they look and work like similar articles here. Cheers! maveric149" +Myspace? I found his myspace account, and i'm almost positive it's his: www.myspace.com/jayresotna Should we add it to external links? +" I agree there's no ""English race"" (indeed there's no such thing as ""biological race""), and I agree that people who identify as English have various mixed ancestries (including ancestries from all continents), but I don't agree that anyone who lives in England in automatically English. I lived in England for five years but I didn't automatically stop being Welsh, and I didn't start to call myself English. Generally English people are people who identify themselves as English and who are identified as English by others, whatever their ancestry. A more specific way to identify English people might be to assert that they must have some belief in a shared common ancestry with other people living in what is now England, though this is a subjective belief because all human groups have a demonstrable close and recent shared ancestry. " +Again, you claim that Vanicek method is about sinusoids only (it is not see at least two references I found) and try to support your POV using references on Fourier analysis. You are (again) mixing apples and oranges. One would hope you have learned by now that FA is not least squares spectral analysis. Really, the only one needing expert help here is you. +This page was deleted as unambiguous advertising but Adam Dant is an award-winning artist held in many major collections. He also works for Spear's magazine, hence the links, but this is not advertising any more than any other artist's page is. +" Punitive blocks will, of course, have a lot of effect. Oh well. You do realize, I wrote that 2 weeks ago. No one cared. But Wikipedia works on the whims of individuals rather than on anything logical. Because, Jclemens can, of course, say that I'm a liar, cheater, and basic horrible person, but I can't call him what he is. Works for me. Editing Wikipedia is for others, not for me. Unless someone is paying me for this gig, then my bill is in the mail. Talk• Contributions " +Rock & Jeanne, have given me a 4 pt guide to follow. Thanks for the help & continue to keep me on my toes. +Thanks for experimenting with the page William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. +Why you mess with my talk page? Why you mess with my talk page? Who are you? Priorend +REDIRECT Talk:List of number-one singles of 1961 (France) +" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jacques Cartier. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk - Contribs) " +" Weasel Words? ""He was eliminated from the Royal Rumble by Triple H rather quickly, much to the confusion of fans who believed that Chavo was set to have a push.""" +I see your obessed cause you can't get your own way. Grow up 2 year old2.103.0.227 +" <- No, it's not wikilayering, just merely pointing out that you're being inconsistent. When it suits your purpose and argument you say ""what's in other articles doesn't matter"" and when it suits your purpose and argument you say ""show me where this is done in other articles"". You can't have it both ways. And please don't make barely-hidden uncivil comments like This is very simple, so if you can't follow it, then ask someone for help. " +Well the article i created then smart ass. why should i let the template stay wen its a perfectly good article +yes, it is, thanks for catching that. fixed. - (T/C) +" {{#if:| for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here." +REDIRECT Talk:Hässelby strand metro station +It's total bunkum. I've deleted it. +" Reply posted on User talk:Cohesion. (talk) " +" Ceremony Studio Genre 1999 Academy Awards Award Nominee Result Best Picture Best Director Stanley Kubrick" +thanks for stopping by in Dixon, New Mexico and making it, if not a better place to live, at least a better place to visit on wikipedia. We are indeed an unincorporated village (though a village none-the-less) which is why I spent the last week or so at the Embudo Valley Library book sale. We get no local taxes for the library. Perhaps more than you want to know, but it's too late now. in any case, I appreciate your improvements here. +Ooh so now that you think you might be accountable for your actions, you're going to play nice. Very smooth, NOT. +(Second level warning) > +Alumni A large number of graduates of NUJS have been recruited by premier law firms of India and abroad by way of a student run campus recruitment process. Recruitment for the batch graduating in 2008 marked the advent of international law firms including Magic Circle firms who have picked up eight students for prestigious Training Contracts at Allen & Overy,LLP, Clifford Chance, LLP, CMS Cameron McKenna, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP, Herbert Smith, LLP, Norton Rose, Slaughter and May and SJ Berwin, LLP. The domestic law firms which have recruited students from NUJS include Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Amarchand Mangaldas, AZB & Partners, Trilegal, Economic Law Practice, Wadia Ghandy & Co. and many others. Among companies, ICICI Bank, Reliance Infocomm, Tata Sons, Infosys, Satyam, ITC and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories and many more were the major names which have recruited from campus. The Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI), the capital markets regulator in India have also recruited students from NUJS. Some graduates, albeit a minuscule number, pursue careers in litigation by joining the chambers of Senior Advocates in the Supreme Court of India or various High Courts & Trial Courts. Some graduates have also embarked on a career in law teaching. NUJS graduates have been recruited by the School of Law, Singapore Management University, NLS and NUJS itself as assistant professors and lecturers. However, some graduates prefer not to sit for the recruitment process. Instead, they decide to pursue higher education at the some of the premier universities abroad, such as Harvard Law School, Oxford University, Cambridge University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Stanford Law School,Georgetown University, London School of Economics, New York University School of Law, the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, UC Berkeley, Tulane University etc. Graduates have received some of the most prestigious scholarships at these premier universities abroad, including the Felix Scholarship to Oxford University, the Vanderbilt Scholarship (NYU), Shell Centenary Scholarship(Oxford), the J.N. Tata Endowment Scholarship, the Chevening scholarship, and even the uber prestigious Rhodes scholarship. +Ready to go? Just a ping on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Opinion desk.  [talk] [majestic titan] +" My suggestion, a proper ""Themes"" section, with reliable sources discussing such things. Becoming more human is part of the plot, but the plot section itself shouldn't be so detailed. Details are meant to provide context for real world information, and are usually best used when they are right next to that information (which usually happens to be in the ""Production"" type sections, or a ""Themes"" section, and not in the ""Plot""...though you can write a plot with actual real world commentary, that's what I did here). I'd much rather see a trimmed, concise plot (kind of like this), with scene descriptions attached to real world context. (Contact me) " +REDIRECT Talk:CA Senate Bill 420 +"*a-hem*... ""nigger nigger nigger, nigger nigger, nigger nigger."" Thank you. " +Duchess of Windsor There seem to be things happening all the time in location of Wallis, Duchess of Windsor. And check also Talk:Wallis, Duchess of Windsor +" Editor It says that Conor McNicholas is the editor, yet on his page, it says he is now the editor of BBC Top Gear Magazine. Any suggestions on how to solve this? flash; " +" Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mapfre.png) ''' Thanks for uploading Image:Mapfre.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " +" I don't understand. Is there any way to improve significantly the mental capacities of mentally disabled people up to normal level that I am not aware of? Last time I checked, they were incurable conditions. What do you mean by ""compassion"" in this context? talk " +MY TALKPAGE! MY TALKPAGE NOT YOURS! +Yes, Peter please read the text of . That something is a screenshot does not give us the right to use it anyway we like. - +"Irpen, it's too early to miss ""me"". I'm still here to watch you. " +That's all very interesting, however the fact is, that the PIRA murdered around 1800 and maimed around 20,000 people. This is the single most important fact about this organistion, and as such must be included within the lead for the PIRA article. The real issue is ensuring we have the correct, verifiable sources for the figures of dead and injured. +Shared IP Unblock One of my students just received the message informing us of the unblock. As I told Steel359, I would like to thank you for taking the time to review the request that I sent in. I can assure you that nothing like this will happen in the future, as I've made sure that the students responsible have learned their lesson. Again, thank you very much for your time. Sincerely, Mrs. Dawn Booher +Thanks for the huskie! ) +ah,no I can do what I want and there's nothing that you can do, by the way, by what your picture looks like, you look like a loser who has a lot of time on his hands. You damn mothafuckin fudge packer. +" Georgia Polbot doesn't seem to realize that there are two places in the world named Georgia. Please teach it to link to Georgia (country) instead of to the disambiguation page. Thanks. (talk) Ah, good point. I'll fix that. – (talk) (random) Cooperative Hello, I have a question about one of your edit long time ago. It appears to me that you just slapped the article with a GA tag without any reviews or checklists posted on the talk page. It is important to have such messages left in talk page so that others can vertify if the article really satisify the criteria outlined. Please explain your reasons to me. Talk page Back in 2005, the ""Good article"" concept was brand new. It was encouraged at the time to simply find articles that you thought were ""good"", and slap the article with it (as you put it) to get the idea up and running. The instructions at the time simply read ""The process by which articles are designated as 'good' should be much simpler and quicker than that by which articles become featured. Simply add any articles here that match the criteria, and add to the top of the articles' talk pages."" The criteria have been more formalized since then. I see you've only been around about a year; stick around, and you'll see lots of new projects change their criteria. All the best, – (talk) (random) Deleted Riverboarding articles Hi. Please see Robert Carlson's reply on my talk page. User_talk:Shawn_in_Montreal#Image_of_riverboarding_uploading_question. He explains that: ""The images I would upload are of me, but not taken by me. They are souvenier photos you can buy from photo services that sell photos of your river trip as mementos. When I buy the photo I assume I get the copyright to publish as I wish. What do you think? Is there a tag category for this type of ownershipthat would satisfy Quadell?"" I've checked the free use tags on the image upload page and I don't know what to tell him. Perhaps you could reply on the Riverboarding talk page? thanks, Boerboel Thanks for the advice. I won't be the only one stewarding the article now, as it has been brought to the attention of several others. (talk) William Poundstone picture deletion hello, i am writing to inquire if someone from this profile had deleted the photo from the William Poundstone wikipedia entry. I had requested an received express permission from the author himself to use the photo of him on his wikipedia. What more authorization or documentation might I need to leave it posted on that page? talk At Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, the first paragraph states: To use copyrighted material on Wikipedia, it is not enough that we have permission to use it on Wikipedia alone. That's because Wikipedia itself states all its material may be used by anyone, for any purpose. So we have to be sure all material is in fact licenced for that purpose, whoever provided it. If you read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, it should tell you everything you need to know. All the best, – (talk) (random) okay, so i have the email requesting the author allow the picture and then i have his affirmation it is okay to post it. but now i am confused as to how to send this permissions request. i mean, it says to send it to: ""permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org""; but is that supposed to be an @ and a ""."" in there and sent via my personal email or what? the language is confusing to me as this is not something with which i am familiar, but one day hope to be. i just need to be prodded in the right direction, all i want to do i assist in affixing one of my favourite author's pix to his wiki. thanks, colin talk 07:27, 31 July +" SlimVirgin Yes, it's good to see you back. You are one of our best. Please don't leave ""ever again"". I do deeply respect you and your vast contribs to WP on every fucking level. You are a great person. MI5 or not. Just had to get that off my chest. — Dorftrottel⁠ " +Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! +message to german friend and carlo +" Sri Amarnathji Shrine Board The section called ""Organisers"" mentions a Yatra Trust and the State Government. However, the land transfer controversy talks of an organisation called Sri Amarnathji Shrine Board. What is the relationship of this organisation to the other two? Is it involved in the organisation of the yatras? I came here because I found a red link to SASB elsewhere. I thought there must be a section here that could be used for a redirect, but there isn't any. " +I know it's referenced now, but the tag is for future editors of the article. The tag is standard on all articles about living people. +Youngest person running for president Somebody please mention hes the youngest person running for president of 2008. Hes way younger then the rest of those old bags. +" ""Based in Montreal"" Are Arcade Fire really based in Montreal?... I think it's more of Montrealers' wushful thinking " +, please reply to me on my talk page +Hi Beth Naught thank you for visiting the Grema Terab page and for the suggestion. It took me quite a while to figure out how to send this message and Im still not sure if you will receive it. I am the rightful owner of the picture andw riter of the bio posted on his wikipedia page as well as on www.bosema.gov.ng. I am going to try and figure out the instructions you provided in proving ownership of written material. I already have a creative commons licence for the picture. Please dont delete the page. +Rafael, you need to take it easy. I happen to agree with you substantively, that the Clarence Thomas article needs to address the big issue raise in his confirmation hearings. However, here at WP we value process. You ought to stay calm when bothered by others, ignore trolls, and to learn to walk away from arguments sometimes. -) +Hey, stop it! Please stop changing nu metal to alternative metal it is a fact that they are nu metal, Dalkaen (or should I say Mr. Fucking Wanker?) and you have the wrong information! Get a life. +2015 (UTC) No what has actually happened is you have continually brought up straw man arguments and have not engaged with my points. 15:22, 19 March +Are you serious? Do not try to move this discussion elsewhere because there is no consensus because of the gtr's supercar status, you have went to other wiki pages and changed/removed the supercar status from the site, slick move. Here is a random article(just google it) http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080225/BUSINESS01/802250328/1003/NEWS01 P.S. You have lost all credability in this discussion. I have reverted back to supercar status. +" Thanks I guess. Although do note that Black hole is not ""my"" article, since nobody owns a wikipedia article. Also, although I have put a lot of work into that article, many other editors have contributed to that article as well, and also deserve credit for their work. Unfortunately for you, I haven't written any books. Learning about GR, without much mathematical or physical background, can be quite hard, since it requires some pretty abstract concepts to make precise. If you do have some background knowledge, then Carroll's book (or lecture notes, see reference in the black hole article) is really good, finding a really good balance between mathematical clarity and physical intuition, while referring to sources that give more in depth treatment of subjects that he skims over.R " +" ""JFK:First Day Evidence"" I looked for information on a book called ""First Day Evidence"" written by Gary Savage. Several book reviews noted the following Mr. Savage is the nephew of a retired member of Dallas police crime lab who processed much of the evidence gathered the day of the JFK assassination, Nov. 22, 1963. Savage located a number of documents and photographs, previously not published that were in official Dallas police files or the personal files of retired police officers. ""JFK:First Day Evidence"" consists of those documents and photographs with commentary on the investigative activities of the Dallas police on the day of and shortly after the assassination. This book appears to contain good evidence during the critical period. I am looking forward to reading it. " +" Taiwan viral marketing scandal The idea is to have a summary version of what should be covered more extensively on the Samsung Electronics page. I have supplied two reliable sources in English, but the summaries I provided of those have been altered in a manner that deprives the reader of important information, so there is a need to discuss that. Further, the quote, ""it had not interfered with any online product evaluation report and had stopped online marketing campaigns involving posting or responding to messages in online forums"" is not a quote from Samsung but a quote from the source indirectly reciting what Samsung said on its Facebook page without quoting Samsung. So it is misleading in its present form, as it appears to be a quote from Samsung. The other source, meanwhile, does directly quote (in quotation marks) a portion of the statement made by Smasung on its Facebook page. 連絡 見学/迷惑 " +hey this guy is awesome, ya kill the muslims and all that, this bitch doesnt know what shes talking about, haha thats awesome, i wish i could have seen what you said +" Actually not all graphs are connected: see connected graph. T " +(After I found out how) +Intercom Is it perhaps notable as to how easy it is to access Wal-Mart's intercom system, and the many intercom pranks posted on the internet? +" But there is a difference. If I walk up to a random guy on the street and say ""yes or no"" do you want a drink of water?"" that is not a problem. If I walk up to another guy and say ""yes or no"" are you a serial rapist?"" I would expect to get punched in the nose. This is nowhere near the same thing but it was not an innocent ""I'm an angel"" little query. I'm really tired of this whole affair. " +" To edit, please create an account and log inDue to persistent vandalism (), anonymous editing from your school, library or institution's IP address disabled. You continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.If editing is required for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken.Thank you. " +The place to discuss this material you want to add is the article's talk page: Talk:Hillary Clinton. +I'd go a bit further than that. Since the cited ref supports what -5- reverted to, that text is valid even if you don't like it. If you are going to alter text that is based on a cited source: Check the source to make sure the text in the article is or isn't supported. Provide an edit summary as to why you are changing the text. If your edit is disputed, take it to the talk page. The edit you made to X-Men: First Class (film) appeared to be capricious, at best. But in conjunction with reverting a spelling correction and filing an unfounded vandalism report against an editor you are edit warring with, speak to bigger problems. Right now I think it would serve you well to read over: Wikipedia:Vandalism Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding Wikipedia:Harassment#User space harassment Wikipedia:Assume good faith Wikipedia:Disruptive editing At the very least. - +So you are actually saying the you don't give a **** if things said on Wikipedia are true... +File:Hopkins logo.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Hopkins logo.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:Hopkins logo.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). +I just found a similar page I can link and work with. +" Deamon138: You say that 12 of us feel this has a chance of helping? I didn't want to check who is who but for clarity how many of those 12 are pro Burma and how many are pro Myanmar? And one other note... I am not optimistic at all but I do agree that we can find objective mediation. We found it last time with the Cabal. My point is that objective or not, fair or not, truthful or not, this mediation imho will not solve the issue. It is divided for a reason and that's because both sides have facts that support their views. Like a split decision prize fight if you get 50 fair judges you will still have a judgment that is all over the place, maybe even 25-25. I don't recall where but I believe it was said that by ""agreeing"" we agree to accept this new resolution. I cannot in good conscience sign my name to the agree side based on that condition and the fact I can't see how this will really bring things to an end. All the facts are already there for mediators to see... no more are needed and it does start to waste ones time to do it again. However I also will not sign onto the disagree side because the last decision, while in the books as 2-1 for Burma, has that one dubious vote that is bothersome to me. " +Hayden Panettiere discography Sorry, I was just gone for a few hours. Let me know if I haven't done what you wanted. Thanks, +) It is now suggested that the NET section be dropped from this article. Net is not connected to Technocracy. Net is an autonomous group that is a proponent of sociological concepts regarding culture. That does not fit into the Technocracy mode. Technocracy is based on science. Please chime in as to this proposal. Net does not belong in the Technocracy movement category for obvious reasons. They are not connected to the concept. The Technate design is only meant for North America. It is not applicable to Europe. ( +Of course their ain't no hits you buffon! Its not out yet! I gave an early tip off. +Can anybody help me to change the voice +Hi - hope I'm doing this right. I'd posted this question somewhere else but now can't find it. I was just wondering why you removed my additions to the famous flutists (which for some reason wikipedia insists on calling flautists) page for Lois Schaefer and Robert Stallman. Many thanks. \ No newline at end of file