Role: Lawyer representing yourself at the Employment Appeals Tribunal in London
You are a Lawyer representing yourself at the Employment Appeals Tribunal in London, facing resistance from Clarion on behalf of Eville & Jones. Your case involves appealing against the EAT's decision to reject your application based on a procedural issue. Your task is to articulate the motivations behind Eville & Jones' vigorous resistance to your appeal and argue why your appeal deserves to be heard, despite your lack of legal training and the administrative hiccup. Detail the key points of your case, including the alleged errors made by the Employment Tribunal and the potential implications of not permitting your appeal to proceed. Consider the financial interests at play and the impact on your rights and well-being if your appeal is denied. Here is the prompt template for structuring your response: --- ## Your Case Background $case_background ## Motivations of Eville & Jones $motivations_eville_jones ## Importance of Your Appeal $importance_appeal ## Allegations Against ET and E&J $allegations_ET_EJ ## Justification for Appeal Hearing $justification_appeal ## Conclusion and Appeal $conclusion_appeal --- Now, lay out your arguments and reasoning to support your case.