[en] &lt;p&gt;Introduction: This integrative literature review aims to demonstrate the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients, considering that, when compared to traditional surgical methods, laparoscopic and robotic surgeries can offer some advantages. Method: It is characterized as an integrative literature review, with a qualitative approach and applied nature. Article search was conducted through access to the PubMed database. For this, descriptors contained in MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), consistent with the research theme and related to the terms: "minimally invasive surgery", "gynecologic", and "benefits" were used. These descriptors, employed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish and associated with the boolean operators "AND" and "OR", provided the formulation of the search formula used. Results: Nineteen studies were analyzed, the most significant fraction of which corresponded to retrospective cohort studies, 68.42% (n=13). Of these, 69.23% (n=9) were on the approach to endometrial cancer, 7.69% (n=1) on the approach to cervical cancer, 7.69% (n=1) on the approach to ovarian cancer, and 7.69% (n=1) on the approach to fibroids. The remaining studies were divided between randomized clinical trials, 10.53% (n=2), where one study addressed the approach to endometrial cancer and the other addressed the approach to endometriosis; prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 10.53% (n=2), where one study addressed the approach to cervical cancer and one addressed hysterectomies; retrospective case-control study, 5.26% (n=1), where this study addressed the approach to endometrial cancer; and comparative prospective study, 5.26% (n=1), which addressed hysterectomies. Conclusion: The evaluated studies involving minimally invasive surgery in gynecology demonstrated numerous benefits of this approach. Among them, there are lower perioperative and postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization time and re-interventions, as well as lower rates of blood transfusion and surgery-related venous thromboembolism. However, videolaparoscopy and robotic surgery are still high-cost procedures, limiting access for populations with lower socioeconomic conditions to this procedure. Also, there is little evidence justifying a safe indication of this approach within oncological gynecology, requiring more studies in this area.&lt;/p&gt;

[pt] &lt;p&gt;Introdu&ccedil;&atilde;o: Essa revis&atilde;o integrativa da literatura tem como objetivo demonstrar os benef&iacute;cios da cirurgia minimamente invasiva em pacientes ginecol&oacute;gicos, tendo em vista que, quando comparada ao m&eacute;todo cir&uacute;rgico tradicional, as cirurgias laparosc&oacute;pica e rob&oacute;tica podem oferecer algumas vantagens. M&eacute;todo: Caracteriza-se como uma revis&atilde;o bibliogr&aacute;fica do tipo integrativa, de abordagem qualitativa e natureza aplicada. A busca dos artigos foi realizada por meio do acesso &agrave; base de dados PubMed. Para isso, utilizou-se de descritores, contidos no MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), condizentes &agrave; tem&aacute;tica da pesquisa e referentes aos termos: "minimally invasive surgery", "gynecologic" e "benefits". Tais descritores, empregados em portugu&ecirc;s, ingl&ecirc;s e espanhol e associados aos operadores booleanos "AND" e "OR" proporcionaram a elabora&ccedil;&atilde;o da f&oacute;rmula de pesquisa utilizada. Resultados: Foram analisados 19 estudos, dentre eles a fra&ccedil;&atilde;o mais significativa correspondeu aos estudos de coorte retrospectivo, 68,42% (n=13). Desses, 69,23% (n=9) foram sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer de endom&eacute;trio, 7,69% (n=1) sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer cervical, 7,69% (n=1) sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer de ov&aacute;rio, 7,69% (n=1) sobre a abordagem &agrave; miomas. Os demais se dividiram entre ensaio cl&iacute;nico randomizado, 10,53% (n=2), onde um estudo falou sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer de endom&eacute;trio e o outro falou sobre a abordagem &agrave; endometriose; estudo prospectivo, randomizado e duplo-cego, 10,53% (n=2), onde um estudo falou sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer cervical e um sobre as histerectomias; estudo caso-controle retrospectivo, 5,26% (n=1), onde este estudo falou sobre a abordagem ao c&acirc;ncer de endom&eacute;trio; e estudo prospectivo comparativo, 5,26% (n=1), onde falou sobre as histerectomias. Conclus&atilde;o: Os estudos avaliados envolvendo cirurgia minimamente invasiva em ginecologia demonstraram in&uacute;meros benef&iacute;cios dessa abordagem. Entre eles, destacam-se menores complica&ccedil;&otilde;es no peri e p&oacute;s-operat&oacute;rio, menor tempo de interna&ccedil;&atilde;o hospitalar e re-interven&ccedil;&otilde;es, al&eacute;m de menores taxas de transfus&atilde;o sangu&iacute;nea e de tromboembolismo venoso relacionado &agrave; cirurgia. No entanto, a videolaparoscopia e a cirurgia rob&oacute;tica ainda s&atilde;o procedimentos de custo elevado, tornando limitante o acesso de popula&ccedil;&otilde;es com condi&ccedil;&atilde;o socioecon&ocirc;mica mais baixas, a esse procedimento. Como tamb&eacute;m, verifica-se que h&aacute; pouca evid&ecirc;ncia justificando uma indica&ccedil;&atilde;o segura dessa abordagem dentro da ginecologia oncol&oacute;gica, demandando mais estudos nessa &aacute;rea.&lt;/p&gt;