[en] The present study, on the other hand, comes to complement previous publications brings over some aspects of Plato's philosophy, as well as the work of degree, in which the concept was analyzed of m?mesis in different dialogs of the author, who fulfills an important function both in the aesthetics and in the platonic epistemolog?a and the metaphysics. Here, nevertheless, we are aparatado of this type of conceptual and terminological study, which was seeking to indicate the place and the importance of the m?mesis, as well as the evolution and the different exhibitions and implications of the imitation in the set of his philosophy, but the effort has centered principally in an alone work, in spite of the fact that, since it has been said, the link with others is so narrow that the mention of the same ones results in occasions unavoidably. As we have improved, our intention is it of respecting, as far as possible, the enormous wealth and complexity that possesses the alone one of his works, as well as also the set of the platonic texts. In spite of it, they are necessary certain distinctions and classifications, motive that has led us to dividing the work in three sections, which must not conceal from the reader the unit and coherence that is outlined in the Fedro. First, we will dedicate a chapter to the consideration of the platonic myth, being the mythology one of the creations most typical of the Greek spirit, as well as a fundamental component of the platonic dialogs, analyzing his presence and importance in them in the same way that his relation with the argumentations and the passages in which the discussion appears in a strictly rational way. In many works the myth constitutes a decisive element of the conversation, but it it is even more in the Fedro, where Plato exposes some of his more brilliant, imaginative and poetical myths, the majority of which they do not come from the tradition, since it is habitual, but they turn out to be another brilliant invention of the author. On the other hand, the comment of the dialog will divide in two big sections, the first one of which it will centre on the analysis of the speeches, as well as of Eros, on the topic concerning which it turns the first part of the work, since in her S?crates competes with a speech of the speaker Lisias, whom Fedro seems to admire deeply. The second part, in correspondence with what we find in the dialog, confronts rhetorical and methodological topics, so S?crates and his friend dedicate the end of his conversation to the discussion on the oratory, the dialectics and the writing. Such it is, since it has been said, the diversity of topics of the dialog, which from very ancient exists a controversy for establishing the central matter of the same one.

[es] El presente estudio, por otra parte, viene a complementar anteriores publicaciones acerca algunos aspectos de la filosof?a de Plat?n, as? como el trabajo de grado, en el cual se analiz? el concepto de m?mesis en distintos di?logos del autor, que cumple una importante funci?n tanto en la est?tica como en la epistemolog?a y la metaf?sica plat?nicas. Aqu?, sin embargo, nos hemos aparatado de este tipo de estudio conceptual y terminol?gico, que buscaba se?alar el lugar y la importancia de la m?mesis, as? como la evoluci?n y las distintas exposiciones e implicaciones de la imitaci?n en el conjunto de su filosof?a, sino que el esfuerzo se ha concentrado principalmente en una sola obra, a pesar de que, como se ha dicho, el v?nculo con otras es tan estrecho que la menci?n de las mismas resulta en ocasiones ineludible. Seg?n hemos adelantado, nuestra intenci?n es la de respetar, en la medida de lo posible, la enorme riqueza y complejidad que posee una sola de sus obras, as? como tambi?n el conjunto de los textos plat?nicos. A pesar de ello, son necesarias ciertas distinciones y clasificaciones, motivo que nos ha llevado a dividir el trabajo en tres secciones, lo cual no debe ocultar al lector la unidad y coherencia que se destaca en el Fedro. En primer lugar, dedicaremos un cap?tulo a la consideraci?n del mito plat?nico, siendo la mitolog?a una de las creaciones m?s caracter?sticas del esp?ritu griego, as? como un componente fundamental de los di?logos plat?nicos, analizando su presencia e importancia en ellos del mismo modo que su relaci?n con las argumentaciones y los pasajes en los que la discusi?n se presenta de un modo estrictamente racional. En muchas obras el mito constituye un elemento decisivo de la conversaci?n, pero lo es m?s a?n en el Fedro, donde Plat?n expone algunos de sus mitos m?s brillantes, imaginativos y po?ticos, la mayor?a de los cuales no provienen de la tradici?n, como es habitual, sino que resultan ser otra genial invenci?n del autor. Por otro lado, el comentario del di?logo se dividir? en dos grandes secciones, la primera de las cuales se centrar? en el an?lisis de los discursos, as? como de Eros, el tema en torno al cual gira la primera parte de la obra, ya que en ella S?crates compite con un discurso del orador Lisias, a quien Fedro parece admirar profundamente. La segunda parte, en correspondencia con lo que encontramos en el di?logo, afronta temas ret?ricos y metodol?gicos, pues S?crates y su amigo consagran el final de su conversaci?n a la discusi?n sobre la oratoria, la dial?ctica y la escritura. Tal es, como se ha dicho, la diversidad de temas del di?logo, que desde muy antiguo existe una controversia por establecer el asunto central del mismo.