[en] The article is divided into three phases. Affirmation, thesis or statement of the problem that leads us to ask ourselves about the different anthropological conceptions of human being, namely, the predominance of the anthropological conception of human being as an exclusively biological being, only physically and pharmacologically treatable by which ?the pandemic caused by the virus Sars Cov 2, which causes the disease called COVID 19, must be addressed through massive confinement of the population in their homes, along with the use of a mask, pharmacology and vaccination?. Denial, antithesis or discovery of the divergence or split, already pointed out by Max Scheler in The Human Place in the Cosmos, between the different anthropologies, namely, mainly philosophical, theological and physical with respect to which different conceptions of human being arise that question the exclusively biological conception of it and its predominance over others such as a dialogical being, as the supreme being of the creation, image and likeness of God, as a rational being, as an evolved being, as being unlimited, as being unknown, as symbolic being or as being limited. Third, synthesis or overcoming of the split that supposes the predominance of the exclusively biological conception of human being through the challenge in which a new conception of human being is constituted that integrates, attends, cares for, respects and adequately listens to physical, mental, civic and spiritual dimensions where human being is presented as being morally and ethically responsible, appropriately distinguishing between anthropological challenges of a moral nature and anthropological challenges of an ethical nature capable of making human life sustainable in a post-pandemic scenario.

[es] El art?culo se divide en tres partes. Primera, afirmaci?n, tesis o planteamiento del problema que nos lleva a preguntarnos por las diferentes concepciones antropol?gicas del hombre, a saber, el predominio de la concepci?n antropol?gica del hombre como ser exclusivamente biol?gico s?lo tratable f?sica y farmacol?gicamente mediante la cual ?la pandemia causada por el virus Sars Cov 2 que provoca la enfermedad llamada COVID 19 debe ser afrontada por medidas de biolog?a pol?tica como el confinamiento de la poblaci?n, el uso de mascarilla, farmacolog?a y vacunaci?n?. Segunda, negaci?n, ant?tesis o descubrimiento de la divergencia o escisi?n, se?alada ya por Max Scheler en El puesto del hombre en el cosmos, entre las distintas antropolog?as, a saber, principalmente filos?fica, teol?gica y f?sica respecto de las cuales surgen distintas concepciones del hombre que cuestionan la concepci?n exclusivamente biol?gica del mismo y su predominio sobre las dem?s tales como el hombre como ser dial?gico, el hombre como ser supremo de la creaci?n, imagen y semejanza de Dios, el hombre como ser racional, el hombre como ser evolucionado, el hombre como ser ilimitado, el hombre como ser inc?gnita, el hombre como ser simb?lico o el hombre como ser limitado. Tercero, superaci?n o s?ntesis de la escisi?n agravada en gran medida por el predominio de la concepci?n exclusivamente biol?gica del hombre mediante el desaf?o en que se constituye una nueva noci?n del hombre que integre, atienda, cuide, respete y escuche adecuadamente sus dimensiones f?sica, ps?quica, c?vica y espiritual donde el hombre se cultive como ser responsable moral y ?ticamente distinguiendo apropiadamente entre los desaf?os antropol?gicos de tipo moral y los desaf?os antropol?gicos de tipo ?tico garantizando la sostenibilidad de la vida humana en un escenario postpandemia.