[en] In an express and repeated way, Carmelo Lis?n emphasizes the centrality of the word and the hearing in anthropological research. In this area, his attention spans the hermeneutic indagation of the semantic fields of ?words-perch? to local accounts around the existential aporia. However, the discourse of his Galician monographs shows that in his ethnographic work the visual pathway is also decisive for the recording of the episodes and, in them, for the careful creation of his textual narrative. This technical clamp that articulates the heard and the observed is in accordance with the socio-hermeneutic method characteristic of Lisonian anthropology, oriented to the understanding and tentative interpretation of the symbolic universes of cultural meanings and values, including its most remote and ineffable aspects ?all of them vehiculated through the local narrative?, but always anchoring exegesis in a dense contextualization, on the solid rock of socio-structural and ecological analysis of the real existential conditions of human groups ? which also involves developing a methodical observer perspective. In the elaboration of his monographs, Lis?n convenes an ethnographic plettive of testimonial fragments in direct style that acts as an initial hypotext, whose polyphony remarkably enriches the hypertext; his narrative written as an anthropologist-author. This is one of the research's resources that more strong veracity confers on monographic fiction by informing it with local verbalized experience. In this way, an unequaled anthropological genre is thus consolidated.

[es] De forma expresa y reiterada, Carmelo Lis?n recalca la centralidad de la palabra y el o?r en la investigaci?n antropol?gica. En este terreno, su atenci?n abarca desde la indagaci?n hermen?utica de los campos sem?nticos de las 'palabras-percha' a los relatos locales en torno a las apor?as existenciales. No obstante, el discurso de sus monograf?as gallegas pone de manifiesto que en su quehacer etnogr?fico la v?a visual tambi?n resulta decisiva para el registro de los episodios y, en ellos, para la cuidada creaci?n de su narrativa textual. Esta pinza t?cnica que articula lo escuchado y lo observado es conforme con el m?todo socio-hermen?utico caracter?stico de la antropolog?a lisoniana, orientada a la comprensi?n e interpretaci?n tentativa de los universos simb?licos de significados y valores culturales, incluidos sus aspectos m?s rec?nditos e inefables ?lo que se vehicula a trav?s del relato local-, pero siempre anclando la ex?gesis en una densa contextualizaci?n, sobre la roca s?lida del an?lisis socio-estructural y ecol?gico de las condiciones reales de existencia de los colectivos humanos ?lo que asimismo implica desarrollar una met?dica perspectiva observadora-. En la elaboraci?n de sus monograf?as, Lis?n convoca una pl?tora etnogr?fica de fragmentos testimoniales en estilo directo que act?a como inicial hipotexto, cuya polifon?a enriquece notablemente el hipertexto; su narrativa escrita de antrop?logo-autor. Este es uno de los recursos del investigador que m?s s?lida veracidad confieren a la ficci?n monogr?fica, al informarla con la experiencia local verbalizada. Se logra consolidar as?, con eficacia inigualada, un g?nero propiamente antropol?gico.