## Department For International Development Annual Report And Accounts 2013–14 Department For International Development Annual Report And Accounts 2013–14

Annual Repor t presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 1 of the International Development (Repor ting and Transparency) Act 2006 
Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 15 July 2014 

## © Crown Copyright 2014

You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v
.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov
.uk/ 
doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email PSI@nationalarchives.gsi.gov
.uk Where third par ty material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov
.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at enquiry@dfid.gov
.uk Print ISBN 9781474106634 Web ISBN 9781474106641 Printed in the UK by The Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office ID SGD004702 06/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum 

## Contents

| Headline results                                                | 4                                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Foreword by the Secretary of State                              | 5                                                  |
| Lead Non-Executive Director's introduction to the Annual Report | 8                                                  |
| Chapter 1:                                                      | DFID overview, priorities and expenditure          |
| Chapter 2:                                                      | DFID results                                       |
| Chapter 3:                                                      | Results in DFID priority countries and regions     |
| Chapter 4:                                                      | Delivering through multilateral organisations      |
| Chapter 5:                                                      | Effective development co-operation                 |
| Chapter 6:                                                      | Accounts: Department for International Development |
|                                                                 |                                                    |
| Chapter 7:                                                      | Analysis of departmental expenditure               |
|                                                                 |                                                    |
| Annex A:                                                        | DFID allocations by programme                      |
| Annex B:                                                        | Annual reporting of statistical information        |
|                                                                 |                                                    |

## Headline Results

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results:* 

 
Q  provided 43.1 million people with access to clean water, better sanitation or improved hygiene 
conditions 
- suppor 
ted 10.2 million children - 4.9 million girls - to go to primary and lower secondary school 
Q 
 ensured that 3.6 million bir 
ths took place safely with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors 
Q 
 prevented 19.3 million children under 5 and pregnant women from going hungry 
Q 
 reached 11.4 million people with emergency food assistance 
Q 
 provided 54.4 million people, including 26.9 million women, with access to financial services to 
help them work their way out of pover 
ty 
Q 
 reached 6.7 million people with cash transfers programmes 
Q 
 helped 85.8 million people to hold their authorities to account and have a say in their community's 
development 
In 2013, the multilateral organisations that DFID suppor ted: 

Q 
 provided food assistance to 80.9 million people in 75 countries; of these 67.9 million were women 
and children (World Food Programme) 
Q 
 immunised 48 million children against preventable diseases (GAVI Alliance) 
Q 
 detected and treated 1.5 million cases of tuberculosis (The Global Fund to Fight AIDS,  
TB and Malaria)  
Q 
 gave 1.0 million new households a water supply (Asian Development Bank)  
Q 
 provided 9.7 million people with new or improved electricity connections   
(African Development Bank) 
Q 
 suppor 
ted over 4.5 million children in primary education, including 2.2 million girls  
(Global Par 
tnership for Education) 
Q 
 enabled 11.5 million people to benefit from healthcare facilities (International Committee of the 
Red Cross) 
Q 
 generated 6.5 million jobs and livelihoods in 113 countries, of which 58% were for women  
(United Nations Development Programme) 

## Foreword By The Secretary Of State  Photo: Rt Hon Justine Greening.

This year we officially became the first G7 country to meet the UN target of spending 0.7% of gross national income on international development. By achieving this we are not only meeting a longstanding promise to the poorest people in the world, we are acting firmly in Britain's national interest. The way we act in developing countries today is crucial to our long-term economic prospects and to our security. DFID is now developing its most coherent, focused and ambitious approach to inclusive economic development it has ever had. Alongside our work on providing core services such as health, education and sanitation, we are increasingly suppor ting sustainable growth to help end aid dependency through growth and jobs. This approach recognises that businesses are crucial to a country's development and bring vital investment, taxes and innovation as well as jobs and economic oppor tunities for the communities where they operate. This smar ter approach to aid benefits Britain too by creating new markets for British businesses to invest in. UK expor ts to developing countries increased by $17 billion between 
2008 and 2013 and Britain's long term economic plan depends on us increasing our global expor ts. By driving growth and de-risking investment in emerging and frontier markets, we have an oppor tunity to do even more business with them. The countries we are giving development assistance to today are the trading par tners of tomorrow. 

British development money is helping to build up strong and investable business environments in developing countries by cutting red tape, breaking down barriers to trade and improving infrastructure. We recognise that small and medium enterprises are critical to creating more jobs and more prosperous economies. The UK is suppor ting a number of programmes that are helping entrepreneurs and small businesses get access to finance. DFID's Impact Investment Fund made its first investment commitment of $15 million earlier this year into Novastar Ventures, a venture capital fund focused on developing and growing breakthrough businesses in east Africa. We are also expanding the range of instruments DFID deploys to share risk with investors and suppor t development. In November last year I took a high-level business delegation with me to Tanzania to explore oppor tunities for investment - the first time DFID has led such a delegation in Africa. I announced DFID would co-invest with commercial and not for profit par tners in 4 business projects, including new tea and rice estates, with clear development outcomes for Tanzanians. This means we will share some of the risk that would otherwise stop investment from taking place, and we will also share the reward if the venture is a success. I believe British businesses have a crucial role to play in the development effor t and DFID is increasingly par tnering up with key industries and professions. Last year I launched a new relationship between DFID 
and the London Stock Exchange to suppor t capital market development in sub-Saharan Africa. We are deploying some of the UK's top accounting institutes to countries including Ethiopia, Zambia and Nigeria to help raise professional standards, improve financial repor ting and build investor confidence. We are also working more closely across government to ensure a coherent UK approach to economic development in new markets. Last year DFID, the Foreign Office and UK Trade and Investment launched new High Level Prosperity Par tnerships to strengthen the commercial links between the UK and 5 pilot countries: Angola, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania. 

 
It is critical that we tackle the causes as well as the symptoms of pover ty. Sustainable economic growth and development require peace, the rule of law, an absence of corruption, the recognition of proper ty rights and institutions that ser ve all the people, not just a select few. This is what our Prime Minister calls the Golden Thread of Development: open societies and open economies that give people the space to live and be heard and companies the cer tainty to invest. DFID has a growing por tfolio of projects and programmes that work to strengthen the legal, regulatory and institutional frameworks in developing countries. We are helping countries to build their own tax base, so that when economic growth does happen they are well placed to then reap and reinvest the gains. The G8 land par tnerships, launched during the UK presidency last year, are helping to attract responsible investment through better assessment of the land related risks and how to mitigate them. No country can truly develop if it leaves half its population behind and improving the prospects of girls and women sits alongside economic development at the hear t of DFID's strategy. Following the International Development Gender Equality Act passed in May this year, DFID has a statutory duty to ensure gender equality is a consideration across all of its work: UK development is helping women around the world have choices in their own lives, control over their future and a voice in their community.  That includes education, financial services, contraception, land rights, security and access to justice. In November last year the UK hosted an international call to action on violence against girls and women in emergencies and gained an unprecedented global agreement on prioritising the needs of girls and women in our humanitarian responses. We will continue to step up this work. The UK will host the Girl Summit, a global summit on the 22 July to tackle 2 previously neglected issues: female genital mutilation and child, early and forced marriage. We will be bringing together governments, NGOs, charities, activists and businesses to galvanise international effor ts to end these abuses once and for all. 

Life-saving humanitarian assistance will continue to be one of DFID's most fundamental responsibilities. In 2013, DFID led the world in our response to 2 enormous humanitarian catastrophes in Syria and the Philippines. Our funding for Syria and the region is now £600 million, which reflects the scale of the suffering. In the Philippines the UK was one of the first donors to get relief to the worst-affected areas in the wake of Typhoon Haiyan. The government sent 2 Royal Navy warships carrying marines, engineers and trained medical staff to the islands in a response praised by international obser vers and by ICAI. In total the UK has provided £77 million in humanitarian suppor t to help 1 million people affected and we are committed to helping the people of the Philippines as they rebuild their country. It sat alongside £94 million raised directly by the DEC appeal from the British public. We have continued to drive value for money in everything we do on behalf of the British taxpayer. We are improving our procurement and programme management, and making sure staff have the skills to deliver the Depar tment's priorities. In October last year I launched a new online Development Tracker tool that allows UK taxpayers to track how hard their overseas development investment is working right down to individual project level. DFID is a world leader in pioneering innovative payments by results programmes for tackling complex development problems. We will shor tly launch one of the world's first Development Impact Bonds to invest in the prevention of deadly sleeping sickness in Uganda. This project will bring together private and public investment to fund schemes for treating infected cattle before the disease spreads and investors will earn a return if their programme is a success. This results based aid could be a major par t of how DFID works in the future. And we continue to achieve against our commitments. By 2013-14 we had: 

 
- provided 54.4 million people, including at least 26.9 million women, with access to financial 
services as a means to work their way out of pover 
ty 
 
- suppor 
ted 10.2 million children, 4.9 million of them girls, to go to primary and lower secondary 
school; 
 
- ensured 3.6 million bir 
ths took place safely 
 
- suppor 
ted 144.7 million people to vote in elections 
 
- reached 11.4 million people with emergency food assistance 
 
The next year promises to be an equally critical year for international development. The Millennium Development Goals for tackling pover ty are due to expire at the end of 2015 and we have a historic oppor tunity to agree an even more ambitious set of goals and to finish the job the MDGs star ted. The UK 
will continue to play an absolutely central role in this. Our ultimate goal is to end aid dependency and secure a better, more prosperous future for everyone. We will continue to ensure that every pound DFID 
spends has the biggest possible impact on the ground and by driving sustainable growth overseas I believe we can also build a stronger, more competitive economy here in the UK. 

Rt Hon Justine Greening Secretary of State for International Development July 2014 

## Lead Non-Executive Director'S Introduction To The Annual Report

The past year has been about both consolidation and change for the Board, and for the Depar tment as a whole. The current Ministerial team has been in place since September 2012. Two Directors General left the Depar tment during 2013-14, a new Director General position focused on economic development was created, and there were also changes at the non-executive level. Eric Salama and Tim Robinson were both appointed to the Board in June, taking the total number of non-executives to 4. Eric also sits on the Audit Committee, which continues to be chaired by Richard Keys, and Tim chairs the Digital Advisory Panel. Their extensive and varied experience has brought welcome new perspectives to Board discussions, and I look forward to working with all of my non-executive colleagues over the coming year. For DFID, 2013-14 was a landmark year in which the government's commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on international development was met. I have been impressed by the way in which the Depar tment managed delivery of this commitment, and in par ticular by the continued focus on ensuring value for money. 

The quality of management information seen by the Board has continued to improve, enabling us to track progress on results and broader por tfolio quality. A strengthened effor t on ensuring timely completion of annual and completion reviews was par ticularly impor tant in this regard. This push was one par t of an overall focus this year on programme management, following an end to end review of DFID's programme and project management cycle. A package of reforms to improve programme leadership, capability and processes has been agreed. Embedding these reforms, and the associated cultural changes, will be a key challenge for the coming year, and something which the Board and its sub-committees will track closely. The Board met 7 times during the year, including 3 excellent away days in spring and early summer focused on DFID's Business Model for the post-2015 period. These discussions focused on ensuring that the Depar tment invests in the right things, in the right places and in the right way. The Board's conclusions determined DFID's future footprint, and shaped the ongoing resource allocation process for 2015-16. DFID was one of 5 Depar tments to pilot Depar tmental Improvement Plans (DIPs). Finalised in June 2014 
with strong involvement from the Board, the DIP sets out how DFID plans to build on the conclusions of the 2012 Capability Review and make progress against the Civil Ser vice Reform plan. On skills, it prioritised building finance, commercial and digital capacity. There has been good progress over the past year on all of these, and par ticularly on commercial transformation. 75% of the Senior Civil Service had under taken commercial skills training by the end of April, and all will have done so by the end of September 2014. An impor tant task for the coming year is to develop a longer-term commercial vision for the Depar tment. 

There has also been a continued focus on driving fur ther efficiencies across the organisation. In October, DFID successfully introduced a new human resources and payroll system - HR Passpor t - which delivered both greater self-ser vice for staff, and better access to accurate management information, with anticipated savings of £1 million per annum from 2014–15. A review of Board effectiveness, and the Depar tment's broader corporate governance, was under taken in early 2014. The purpose was to build on the good progress made in the past year in strengthening the operation of the Board. The recommendations, which have been agreed by the Secretary of State, include: increasing the frequency of formal Board meetings to 6 a year, better aligned with the production of management information; rationalising the number of sub-committees; clarifying the differing roles of the Board and Executive Management Committee; and focusing non-executive engagement on the enhanced Depar tmental Board. These changes will be implemented over the coming months. 


## Dfid Overview, Priorities And Expenditure Overview About Dfid

1.1  
The Depar 
tment for International Development (DFID) leads the UK government's effor 
t to promote 
stability and sustainable development and to end extreme pover 
ty and aid dependency through 
growth and jobs. DFID operates under the International Development Act, which came into force in 2002 and establishes the legal basis for UK development assistance. This means that the Secretary of State for International Development can provide development assistance for sustainable development and welfare, providing that she is satisfied that this assistance is likely to contribute to pover 
ty reduction. 
1.2  
The 2006 International Development (Repor 
ting and Transparency) Act strengthens the accountability 
of the UK government in delivering its pledges to help the world's poorest countries and people. The Act requires DFID to repor 
t annually to Parliament on development policies and programmes and on 
the provision of development assistance to par 
tner countries and the way it is used. This Repor 
t 
discharges DFID's responsibilities under the Act for 2013–14. This chapter is shor 
ter than in the 
2012–13 Repor 
t, reflecting the increase in information made available by the Depar 
tment online; this 
approach will continue for the rest of the Repor 
t in the future as DFID looks to produce a more 
focused Repor 
t that satisfies Parliamentary and legal requirements. 
1.3  
DFID is represented in the Cabinet by the Secretary of State for International Development, the Right Honourable Justine Greening MP
. In the House of Commons, the Secretary of State is suppor 
ted by 
Minister of State, the Right Honourable Alan Duncan MP and Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Lynne Featherstone MP and in the House of Lords by Spokesperson Baroness Nor 
thover. 
1.4  
The most senior civil ser 
vant in DFID is the Permanent Secretary, Mark Lowcock, who is assisted on 
the DFID Executive Management Committee by the Directors General. 
1.5  
The DFID Business Plan for 2012–15 set out a number of priorities for the Depar 
tment. These 
priorities are to: 
- honour international commitments and suppor 
t actions to achieve the Millennium Development 
Goals (MDGs)1 
- drive transparency, value for money and open government - boost economic development - strengthen government and security in fragile and conflict-affected countries and make the UK's 
humanitarian response more effective 
- lead international action to improve the lives of girls and women - combat climate change 
1.6  
DFID's other major areas of responsibility are to: 
- 
 respond to humanitarian disasters 
- 
 deliver on obligations to the Overseas Territories 
- 
 influence the global development system 

## Where Dfid Works

1.7  
DFID works from its UK headquar 
ters in London and East Kilbride and from offices overseas. DFID 
had over 2,750 staff in 2013–14, over half of whom worked in developing countries. In 2013–14, DFID continued to ensure that resources were focused on the places where they will achieve the most impact. Internally, DFID has developed its business model to ensure that it is doing the right things in 
the right places in the right ways. 
1.8  
DFID promotes development in the poorest countries around the world. Resources are delivered through a range of par 
tners including multilateral institutions, civil society organisations and the 
private sector. Additionally, DFID has bilateral country programmes2 in 28 priority countries so that 
suppor 
t can be targeted where it will make the biggest difference. DFID also has regional 
programmes in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Nor 
th Africa, and the Caribbean, and development 
relationships with the Overseas Territories. 

## What Dfid Spent In 2013–14

1.9  
In the financial year 2013–14, DFID's total expenditure was £10,103 million - up from £7,921 million in 2012–13; this enabled delivery of the government's target of spending 0.7% of gross national 
income3 (GNI) as Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2013. The UK became the first G7 nation 
to deliver on the 0.7% spending target. The total comprised £9,918 million programme expenditure, £116 million administration and depreciation costs and £69 million annually managed expenditure. A detailed breakdown of DFID's programme expenditure by programme area is shown in Annex A. 
1.10  A total of £3,259 million was spent directly by DFID's 28 priority country offices. Fur 
ther details of the 
programmes in priority countries can be found in Chapter 3. The largest country programme was Ethiopia, with expenditure of £284.4 million. 
1.11  A total of £4,338 million4 was spent through core contributions to multilateral organisations5 such as 
the United Nations (UN) Development Programme. Additional information on DFID's multilateral programmes is set out in Chapter 4. The remaining programme spend focused on regional and other country programmes, as well as research and programmes to deliver policy priorities. 

## What The Uk Spent On Oda In 2013

 
1.12  ODA is the internationally agreed standard definition of aid, as laid out in the Statistical Repor 
ting 
Directives of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation 
and Development. ODA is repor 
ted by calendar year. In total, including spending by other UK 
government depar 
tments, provisional UK ODA in 2013 was £11,437 million or 0.72% of UK GNI. 
DFID accounted for £10,040 million, or 88% of UK ODA. Table 1.1 below shows the distribution of ODA across UK government depar 
tments. Final UK ODA figures for 2013 will be published in 
October 2014. All of the data is produced in publications that have been accredited as 'National Statistics', the highest grading of official statistics, by the UK Statistics Authority. 



Government departments 


Depar 
tment for International Development 
7,593 
86.6 
10,040 
87.8 
Depar 
tment of Energy and Climate Change 
246 
2.8 
412 
3.6 
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) 
282 
3.2 
289 
2.5 
Depar 
tment for Business, Innovation and Skills 
(BIS) 
48 
0.5 
44 
0.4 
Depar 
tment for Environment, Food and Rural 
Affairs 
22 
0.3 
33 
0.3 
Expor 
t Credits Guarantee Depar 
tment 
20 
0.2 
30 
0.3 
Home Office 
29 
0.3 
30 
0.3 
Depar 
tment of Health 
15 
0.2 
12 
0.1 
Scottish Government 
10 
0.1 
11 
0.1 
Depar 
tment for Work and Pensions 
10 
0.1 
10 
0.1 
Ministry of Defence 
5 
0.1 
5 
0.0 
Welsh Government 
1 
0.0 
1 
0.0 
Depar 
tment for Culture, Media and Spor 
t 
2 
0.0 
1 
0.0 
Other sources of UK ODA 
Conflict Pool (non-DFID) 
176 
2.0 
192 
1.7 
EC Attribution (non-DFID) 
109 
1.2 
134 
1.2 
CDC Group plc 
103 
1.2 
100 
0.9 
Gift Aid 
91 
1.0 
91 
0.8 
Colonial Pensions 
3 
0.0 
2 
0.0 
Total UK ODA 
8,766 
100 
11,437 
100 

Source: Statistical Release - Provisional UK Official Development Assistance as a propor tion of Gross National Income, 2013. 

2012 ODA 
(£million) 
2012 share of 
UK ODA (%) 
2013 ODA 
(£million) 
2013 share of 
UK ODA (%) 

## Dfid Policy Priorities In 2013–14 Boosting Economic Development And Creating Jobs

1.13  Economic development is the only sustainable long term way to end aid dependency. In 2013–14, 
DFID made economic development a key priority: it published the Economic Development Strategic Framework and used a wider array of instruments to stimulate investment that reduces pover 
ty 
through jobs, by raising incomes for individuals through employment, and providing tax receipts for governments to fund services such as health and education. 
1.14  In developing countries, 900 million people are working but are living in pover 
ty, mostly in Africa and 
south Asia. Many DFID-led initiatives contribute to raising incomes and improving job prospects for poor people. For example, a skills programme in Punjab, Pakistan, trained 7,500 people and monitored employment status after training; and over 700,000 people in the hor 
ticulture and garment sectors in 
Kenya, South Africa and Bangladesh are expected to benefit through the Trade and Global Value Chains Initiative which works with global businesses to improve working conditions and job oppor 
tunities. 


1.15  DFID works with businesses to encourage them to invest more, and more responsibly, in developing 
countries. In November 2013, DFID's Secretary of State visited Tanzania accompanied by representatives of 18 UK and international companies to promote investment through par 
tnerships 
and co-investment. As a result of the visit, DFID has co-invested in Kilombero Plantations Ltd to suppor 
t the pilot stage of a new gasification plant to expand irrigation for rice cultivation. Through the 
Food Retail Industry Challenge Fund, DFID helped small farmers in Kenya access the UK distribution market with a yellow passion fruit which is now sold in over 100 stores in the UK. 
1.16  In 24 developing countries, the UK directly suppor 
ts reforms to reduce the costs and time taken to 
register a business, secure title to land, clear goods across borders and enforce contracts in local cour 
ts. In Afghanistan, DFID assistance through the Afghanistan Investment Climate Facility has 
helped reduce the number of steps needed to obtain a land lease from 52 to 9, and those to obtain a business licence from 21 to 8. 
1.17  Financial markets play an impor 
tant role in enabling growth, with access to finance being key to 
making this growth inclusive for poor people. In 2013, DFID helped 11.6 million poor people get access to financial ser 
vices through branchless banking, using their mobile phones, across  
sub-Saharan Africa, south Asia and Latin America. Of these, 46% or 5.3 million were women. 
1.18  CDC Group plc is the UK's development finance institution, 100% owned by the UK government. 
CDC's mission is to suppor 
t the building of businesses throughout Africa and south Asia, to create 
jobs and make a lasting difference to people's lives in some of the world's poorest places. CDC has £2,504.2 million invested in 1,298 companies, suppor 
ting over 1 million jobs in 75 countries.  
CDC-backed companies have created around 495,000 jobs since 2008. In 2013, CDC made 26 new investments totalling £608 million, including 13 direct investments. 

## Improving The Lives Of Girls And Women

1.19  The Secretary of State for International Development has championed the rights of girls and women, 
enabling them to have voice, choice and control over their own development. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State has continued to play a pivotal and driving role in tackling violence against women and girls internationally and through her campaign to end female genital mutilation (FGM) in a generation. Beyond DFID, the Foreign Secretary has also played a vital international role in raising awareness of and addressing the issue of sexual violence in conflict-affected countries. 
1.20  DFID led on government suppor 
t for Bill Cash MP's International Development (Gender Equality) Act 
2014, which became law on 13 March. The Act means that before providing development assistance, consideration must be given to how it will contribute to reducing gender inequality. Gender-related 
differences in needs must also be taken into account before the provision of humanitarian assistance.7 The Act also introduces a new annual repor ting duty on progress towards achieving the MDG 3. 

1.21  In 2013, DFID refreshed its Strategic Vision for Girls and Women. The Strategic Vision drives action to 
increase oppor 
tunities for girls and women through: 
- **Voice** in decision making in their household, community and country, in politics, business, the 
media and civil society 
- **Choice** to complete education and to benefit from paid work and economic oppor 
tunities; over 
whether, when and with whom to have sex, marry and/or have children, ending child, early and forced marriage 
- **Control** over their own bodies and mobility, including their safety from violence; over income, 
productive assets and other resources (including food, water, energy); with equal legal rights and access to justice; and freedom from discriminatory social norms such as female genital mutilation/ cutting (FGM/C) 
1.22  **Enabling girls' and women's voices to be heard:** DFID worked with the Foreign and 
Commonwealth Office (FCO), the Government Equalities Office, the Home Office and par 
tners 
around the world to secure a successful outcome at the UN Commission on the Status of Women in March 2014, where governments called for a post-2015 development goal on gender equality and for women's rights to be mainstreamed across the post 2015 agenda. 
1.23  **Enabling girls and women to have greater choice in their lives:** By 2013–14, DFID had suppor 
ted 
4.9 million girls in primary and lower secondary school (out of 10.2 million children) through its bilateral aid programmes around the world. 
1.24  **Enabling girls and women to have more control over their lives:** In March 2013, DFID star 
ted a 
second phase of suppor 
t to the Africa-led movement to end FGM through a UN Joint Programme, 
now operating in 17 countries. In January 2014, the End FGM/C Social Change Campaign was launched which will work in at least 10 affected countries and with the UK diaspora, to build a movement to end FGM/C. 
1.25  In November 2013, the UK co-chaired with Sweden 'Keep Her Safe', an international Call to Action on 
Protecting Girls and Women in Emergencies. Some 13 donors, 10 multilaterals and over 20 of the world's leading non-governmental organisations (NGOs) made commitments to prioritise the prevention of and response to violence against women and girls as a lifesaving intervention in emergencies. The UK committed £21.6 million. 
1.26  In 2013–14, the Prime Minister announced the Girl Summit 2014 - a high level event on 22 July 2014 
to galvanise global action behind developing country effor 
ts to end child, early and forced marriage 
and FGM within a generation. 

## The Golden Thread Of Development

1.27  DFID works to promote open societies and open governments, enabling states to function for their 
citizens and citizens to lead their own development. 
 
1.28  By 2013–14, DFID had helped 85.8 million people hold decision makers to account. An example of 
this is our programme in Tanzania where DFID suppor 
ted over 5 million Tanzanian women and men to 
understand what ser 
vices they should be able to expect, access ser 
vices including water, education 
and health ser 
vices, and enabled communities to hold authorities to account in cases of poor 
performance. By 2013–14, DFID had provided assistance to 11 countries to suppor 
t freer and fairer 
electoral processes across the developing world, including in Pakistan and Nepal. 
1.29  In 2013, the UK used its G8 Presidency to push for greater transparency on how governments and 
companies operate, at home and abroad. At Lough Erne, G8 members, alongside Panama, Ireland and the Philippines, endorsed the Open Data Char 
ter. G8 members agreed that they would take 
action towards common global standards of extractives transparency and that all land transactions should be transparent, respecting the proper 
ty rights of local communities. The G8 launched 8 
country par 
tnerships to improve land governance and implement the global Voluntary Guidelines on 
the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land and 8 par 
tnerships to improve transparency, 
accountability and capacity to manage extractives. 
1.30  The UK hosted and co-chaired the Open Government Par 
tnership (OGP) Summit in October 2013, 
where DFID launched its Development Tracker website, making development data accessible and transparent. Membership of the OGP increased from 45 to 53 countries committed to greater government transparency and accountability. 
1.31  The Prime Minister co-chaired the UN High-Level Panel of eminent persons on the post 2015 
Development Agenda, which submitted its repor 
t to the UN Secretary General in May 2013.8 The 
repor 
t set out the 5 transformative shifts needed to turn the vision that this can and must be the 
generation to eradicate extreme pover 
ty, into a reality. 

## Responding To Humanitarian Emergencies

1.32  DFID leads the UK government's response to humanitarian emergencies throughout the world, 
responding rapidly and decisively to save lives. 
- the UK acted decisively and rapidly in response to Typhoon Haiyan, which struck the Philippines 
on 8 November 2013 and in which over 6,200 people died, 4.1 million were displaced and 1.1 million homes were damaged or destroyed. The UK provided £77 million in suppor 
t, 
more than any other donor, helping more than a million people. In its repor 
t, the Independent 
Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) gave the UK response to Typhoon Haiyan the highest ever rating for a UK aid programme 
- in the Sahel, DFID is providing suppor 
t to communities facing food insecurity and malnutrition and 
to those affected by conflict. This suppor 
t is expected to benefit over 1.6 million people across the 
region in 2013–14 
- 
 the UK is providing humanitarian assistance in the Central African Republic in response to a severe 
escalation in the crisis. Suppor 
t is provided through the International Committee of the Red Cross, 
NGOs and UN agencies in emergency healthcare, clean water, food security and logistics and is expected to benefit over 100,000 people 
- 
 since conflict erupted in South Sudan in December 2013, displacing up to 1 million people, the UK 
has allocated £95 million to the humanitarian response, making it the second largest donor. DFID has worked with the UN and others to raise awareness of the crisis, to press the government and opposition to respect a ceasefire and allow access for humanitarian aid, and to secure increased commitments of funds from other donors 
- 
 in October 2013, after Cyclone Phailin in Odisha, India, DFID provided 200,000 people with clean 
water, basic shelter and other essential items such as blankets and cooking utensils, with a focus on the most vulnerable, including women and girls 

## Uk Response To The Crisis In Syria

DFID allocated £295 million in aid to the Syria crisis in 2013–14, contributing to making this the largest ever UK response to a humanitarian crisis. Over 9 million people are in dire need of humanitarian aid, with 6.5 million people internally displaced and 2.6 million who have fled to neighbouring countries. The scale of the crisis means that DFID now works with over 30 partners in 6 countries - Syria as well as the neighbouring countries of Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt. DFID leads on UK government efforts to alleviate humanitarian suffering and supports FCO-led efforts to achieve a political solution to the conflict. £295 million was allocated to partners in 2013–14:
Syria 43%

Lebanon 23%

Jordan 21%

Turkey 4%

Iraq 4%

Egypt 1%

Regional 4%
With over 30 different partners, DFID is able to provide support in various sectors. Headline results for 2013–14 are:

- food for up to 535,000 people per month - drinking water for over 600,000 people - over 100,000 individuals benefiting from medical consultations and trauma care - shelter and basic household items for over 50,000 people - DFID also contributes to the No Lost Generation initiative which involves providing child 
protection, psychosocial support and education to Syrian children affected by the crisis - this includes textbooks for 300,000 children in Lebanon

## Implementing The Humanitarian Emergency Response Review

1.33 The government's response to Lord Ashdown's Humanitarian Emergency Response Review (HERR) 
was published in June 2011. This committed the government to improve and reinforce the UK's 
response to humanitarian emergencies. A more effective response requires greater investment in 
preparedness, anticipation and prevention by building resilience. HERR milestones reached in 2013–14 include: 
- a new Global Humanitarian Risk Register used by senior decision makers to give a picture of 
global risk and trends and to ensure that country programming addresses risks 
- multi-year humanitarian programmes providing more predictable funding in chronic situations, 
including triggers for releasing extra funding in response to rapid changes in need
- support for the new Rapid Response Fund, 'Start', to respond to small scale forgotten crises 
across the world
- work with governments in several at-risk countries to ensure they have systems and capability in 
place to respond to disasters (Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma, Mozambique, Malawi, Philippines, Occupied Palestinian Territories)
- innovative use of science in humanitarian response through the Science in Humanitarian 
Emergencies and Disasters mechanism and collaboration with the Met Office to use its weather data in humanitarian crises
- UK International Emergency Trauma Register incorporated into DFID's humanitarian response - 
training courses and deployments are already under way to allow 1,000 UK medical personnel to join the UK humanitarian response
- investment in the UK stockpile, increasing its size in order to provide up to 75,000 people with 
lifesaving non-food items

## Improving Access To Basic Services

1.34  Poor health is both a cause and a consequence of pover 
ty and widens inequalities. The Health 
Position Paper, published in July 2013, sets out how DFID works to improve health outcomes in developing countries. It explains DFID's public health approach, which combines investments that 
achieve targeted results with investments that strengthen broader health systems. 
 
1.35  Achievements during 2013–14 included suppor 
t to increasing access to HIV medicines through 
market shaping by the Clinton Health Access Initiative, resulting in an estimated cost saving of $6.2–8.1 million for 4 African countries. In addition, the Health Par 
tnership Scheme, which funds 
par 
tnerships between UK health professionals and institutions and those in low income countries, 
suppor 
ted par 
tnerships involving 77 UK health institutions to share skills and develop capacity in 41 
low and middle income countries. 
1.36  In 2013–14, DFID-suppor 
ted reproductive, maternal and new-born health programmes resulted in 
747,000 bir 
ths being attended by a skilled bir 
th attendant and 1.4 million additional women using 
modern methods of family planning. DFID also helped suppor 
t 120 million polio vaccinations through 
the Global Polio Eradication Initiative and the immunisation of over 77 million additional children through suppor 
t to the GAVI Alliance and the Measles and Rubella Initiative. Over 57 million people received 
mass drug administration for neglected tropical diseases and 9 million long-lasting insecticide treated bed nets were procured and distributed in high burden countries to prevent malaria. 


1.37  Education facilitates pover 
ty reduction, equality and long term economic development. During 
2013–14, DFID stepped up its work on the Girls' Education Challenge, and is now suppor 
ting 39 
projects globally. This includes teaming up with global businesses to match fund their joint £15.8 million investments (resulting in a total of £31 million) in projects which will increase educational and economic oppor 
tunities for marginalised girls in sub-Saharan Africa. 
1.38  DFID's task force of leading international higher education exper 
ts has completed its assessment of 
the role of higher education in a country's development and provided its views on where development assistance can deliver the biggest impact. Internationally, DFID has been an active par 
ticipant in the 
Learning Metrics Task Force aiming to put access plus learning at the hear 
t of post-2015 education. 


1.39  On 8 June 2013, the UK held a high level nutrition event, 'Nutrition for Growth: beating hunger through 
business and science' co-hosted by the Government of Brazil and the Children's Investment Fund Foundation. It brought governments, civil society, business and science together to reverse the neglect of undernutrition. A high-level declaration, the Global Nutrition for Growth Compact, was endorsed by over 100 governments, business and organisations, and new international financial commitments were made of £2.7 billion to suppor 
t direct nutrition programmes. Alongside significant commitments made 
by others, the UK committed an additional £375 million (between 2013 and 2020) for programmes which address the immediate causes of undernutrition spend, and up to £280 million of matched funding between 2013 and 2020. DFID also committed to increase funding to prevent undernutrition through other sectors (such as social protection, agriculture and water, sanitation and hygiene) by approximately £604 million between 2013 and 2020.9 

## Combating Climate Change

1.40  The £3.87 billion International Climate Fund (ICF) is par 
t of the UK's international effor 
t to address the 
challenge of climate change. It suppor 
ts programmes that help people in developing countries adapt 
to the impacts of climate change, promote low carbon growth and protect forests. These 
programmes aim to improve the quality of people's lives - par 
ticularly women and girls; suppor 
t 
people's livelihoods; and underpin long term economic growth and development. For example, DFID is providing up to £150 million from the ICF to the International Fund for Agricultural Development's Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme which will help up to 6 million smallholder farmers in 30 countries cope with the impacts of climate change. 
1.41  Internationally, DFID has continued to play a leading role in shaping the international climate finance 
architecture, in par 
ticular through membership of the board of the Green Climate Fund. DFID's 
suppor 
t for climate programmes has been recognised internationally: the Legal Response Initiative 
by the DFID funded Climate and Development Knowledge Network programme, designed to assist poor and climate vulnerable countries make their voices heard in the global climate negotiations, won the Climate Week 'best campaign or educational initiative' award. 
1.42  DFID continues to work towards ensuring that climate and environment considerations are integrated 
into all UK development assistance. By the end of 2013, every DFID depar 
tment had under 
taken a 
strategic review to identify how investments and operations can best address climate and environment issues. Deeper analysis of the links between pover 
ty, climate change and resource 
scarcity and how DFID may need to respond is being taken forward through a strategy led by DFID's Executive Management Committee. 

## Dfid Results 2.1 Introduction

2.1  
DFID has invested heavily over the past few years in strengthening its focus on results. In 2011, the DFID Results Framework (DRF) was published setting out the results the UK aims to achieve by 2015. Alongside this, the UK made a number of results commitments as outlined within 'UK aid: Changing lives, delivering results'1 and 'DFID's Strategic Vision for Girls and Women'.2 
2.2  
The Results Framework is used as a tool to monitor and repor 
t progress in delivering these results 
commitments, providing evidence of the impact of UK aid and the improvements made to the lives of poor people in the countries where the UK works. 
2.3  
As illustrated in Figure 2.1, the Results Framework is organised into 4 levels. It sets out the development outcomes DFID is seeking to contribute to (level 1), the actual results DFID will deliver (level 2), and the metrics DFID use to measure its organisational effectiveness and efficiency (level 3 and 4). It is impor 
tant to note that the Framework does not capture everything that DFID is delivering. 
Chapter 3 provides a summary of headline results achieved in each of DFID's priority countries and regions, which vary reflecting the specific priorities and operational context in each country and region. 
Fur ther information on the Results Framework can be found at:  
www.gov
.uk/government/publications/dfid-s-results-framework 

2.4  
This chapter repor 
ts information against each level of the Results Framework, as well as impact and 
input indicators which are included in DFID's business plan. The data is available to download from the GOV
.UK website.3 
 

## 2.2 Reporting Against Dfid'S Results Framework Level 1: Progress On Key Development Outcomes

 
2.5  
The first level of the Results Framework monitors progress towards the Millennium Development Goal 
(MDG) standard indicators. Progress towards these outcomes is driven by the collective action of developing countries and diverse development par 
tners, and not the actions of DFID alone. 
Monitoring progress of these goals is crucial to understanding what results are being achieved through all development resources, not just our own. Where progress is slow or regressing, DFID actively uses this evidence to inform and guide its future programming. 
2.6  
In addition to the MDG standard indicators, level 1 of the DFID Results Framework includes one additional DFID-specific indicator relating to children who can read with sufficient fluency. DFID has incorporated this indicator to reflect the impor 
tance of monitoring the quality of education provided in 
DFID's priority countries alongside the number of children enrolling in school. DFID is working with global par 
tners to develop data systems and tools to measure progress against this indicator by 
2015. 
2.7  
The indicators included in level 1 of DFID's Results Framework are summarised in Figure 2.2. As in previous Annual Repor 
ts, DFID assesses progress against these indicators in 2 ways: 
- Global progress based on the UN assessment is displayed in Figure 2.3 with a shor 
t narrative 
provided for each MDG in Figure 2.4. The UN assessment is based on information available as at June 2013. The latest available data for most indicators refers to 2011 to 2013. 
- Country progress against a subset of 7 MDG indicators based on DFID's assessment of progress 
in each of its priority countries is provided in Chapter 3. 4

| Indicator                                                                                      | Millennium Development Goal                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| (MDG)                                                                                          |                                              |
| Proportion of population below $1.25 (PPP) per day                                             |                                              |
| Goal 1: Eradicate extreme                                                                      |                                              |
| Growth rate of GDP per person employed                                                         |                                              |
| poverty and hunger                                                                             |                                              |
| Employment to population ratio                                                                 |                                              |
| Prevalence of underweight children under 5 years of age                                        |                                              |
| Net enrolment ratio in primary school                                                          |                                              |
| Goal 2: Achieve universal                                                                      |                                              |
| Proportion of pupils star                                                                      | ting grade 1 who reach last grade of primary |
| primary education                                                                              |                                              |
| Literacy rate of 15–24 year olds, women and men                                                |                                              |
| Percentage of children that can read with sufficient fluency for comprehension in early grades |                                              |
| 4                                                                                              |                                              |
| Ratio of girls to boys in primary, secondary and ter                                           | tiary education                              |
|                                                                                                |                                              |
| Share of women in wage employment in the non-agricultural sector                               |                                              |
| Goal 3: Promote gender equality                                                                |                                              |
| and empower women                                                                              |                                              |
| Proportion of seats held by women in national parliament                                       |                                              |
| Goal 4: Reduce child mortality                                                                 |                                              |
| Under 5 mortality rate                                                                         |                                              |
| Maternal mortality ratio                                                                       |                                              |
| Goal 5: Improve maternal health                                                                |                                              |
| Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel                                      |                                              |
| Unmet need for family planning                                                                 |                                              |
| Incidence and death rates associated with malaria                                              |                                              |
| HIV prevalence among population aged 15–24 years                                               |                                              |
| Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS,                                                                       |                                              |
| malaria and other diseases                                                                     |                                              |
| Proportion of population with advanced HIV infection with access to antiretroviral drugs       |                                              |
| Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source                               |                                              |
| Goal 7: Ensure environmental                                                                   |                                              |
| Proportion of population using an improved sanitation facility                                 |                                              |
| sustainability                                                                                 |                                              |
| Proportion of land area covered by forest                                                      |                                              |
| CO                                                                                             |                                              |
| 2                                                                                              |                                              |
| emissions, total, per capita, and per $1 GDP (PPP)                                             |                                              |

1

## Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health

moderate 
access 
(Amber) 
moderate 
Access to reproductive 
low access 
high access 
access 
health 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 

## Goal 6: Combat Hiv/Aids, Malaria And Other Diseases

Halt and begin to 
low 
high 
low 
low 
low 
low 
low 
low 
intermediate 
reverse the spread of 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
incidence 
 
HIV/AIDS 
(Red) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Red) 
low mortality 
(Green) 
moderate 
mortality 
(Green) 
moderate 
Halt and reverse spread 
low mortality 
mortality 
of tuberculosis 
(Amber) 
(Amber) 

## Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability

 
Halve propor 
tion of 
high 
low 
high 
moderate 
high 
high 
low 
high 
moderate 
population without 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
improved drinking water 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Green) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Red) 
 
Halve propor 
tion of 
high 
very low 
low 
low 
very low 
moderate 
very low 
moderate 
high 
population without 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
coverage 
sanitation 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Green) 
(Amber) 
(Amber) 
(Amber) 
(Green) 
(Green) 
moderate 
very high 

Key to colour coding in tables: 

Green 
 
= target already met or expected to be met by 2015 
Amber 
 
= progress insufficient to reach the target if prevailing trends persist 
Red 
 
= no progress or deterioration 
Grey 
 
= missing or insufficient data 
*Pover ty progress for Eastern Asia is assessed based on China's data only. 

Note that the descriptive text (eg very high pover ty) listed against the indicators in Figure 2.3 relates to the current status while the red/amber/green status relates to the relative progress that has been made. 

access 
(Amber) 
moderate 
access 
(Amber) 
moderate 
access 
(Amber) 
low mortality 
(Green) 
low mortality 
(Green) 
moderate 
mortality 
(Amber) 
high 
mortality 
(Amber) 
moderate 
mortality 
(Green) 

## Figure 2.4: Narrative On Global Progress Towards The Mdgs Mdg 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty And Hunger Target 1.A: Halve, Between 1990 And 2015, The Proportion Of People Whose Income Is Less Than $1 A Day. Global Progress: Met Ahead Of Schedule.

The world reached the pover ty reduction target 5 years ahead of schedule. In developing regions, the propor tion of people living on less than $1.25 a day fell from 47% in 1990 to 22% in 2010. About 
700 million fewer people lived in conditions of extreme pover ty in 2010 than in 1990. Extreme pover ty rates have fallen in every developing region, with China leading the way. Pover ty remains widespread in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia, although progress in the latter region has been substantial. 4 out of 5 of the 970 million people expected to be living in extreme pover ty in 2015 will be in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia. 

## Target 1.B: Achieve Full And Productive Employment And Decent Work For All, Including Women And Young People. Global Progress: Lagging.6

Since 2001, the number of workers living on less than $1.25 a day has declined by 294 million. However, 400 million people still work below the $1.25 income threshold and a fur ther 480 million between $1.25 
and $2 a day. The propor tion of workers in vulnerable employment has also decreased globally between 
1991 and 2011 - a positive result for women who are far more likely than men to be engaged in vulnerable employment, especially in Nor thern Africa and Western Asia. However, a large gender gap in employment persists and is unchanged. The employment-to-population ratio for men in developing countries remains at 75% compared to 48% for women. Unemployment remains a key challenge for young people. Negative labour market trends for youth have accounted for 41% of the decline in the global employment-to-population ratio since 2007. The combination of more youth being available for work and falling employment rates among youth contributed two fifths of the global decline in the employment-to-population ratio since 2007. 

## Target 1.C: Halve, Between 1990 And 2015, The Proportion Of People Who Suffer From Hunger. Global Progress: Lagging.

Good progress has been made towards this target in some regions but hunger and undernutrition remain unacceptably high in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. The 2013 Nutrition for Growth (N4G) event, co-hosted by the UK, aimed to secure the scale of commitment needed to accelerate reductions in undernutrition beyond 2015. Through N4G, over 100 governments, donors, businesses and civil society organisations pledged to reduce the number of stunted children in the world by 20 million by 2020. Approximately £14.4 billion was committed by governments of affected countries and donors to suppor t scale-up of ser vices to improve nutrition outcomes. A new Global Repor t on Nutrition will be published annually to track progress against N4G commitments and to hold stakeholders to account for delivering results in high-burden countries. 

## Mdg 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education Target 2: Ensure That, By 2015, Children Everywhere, Boys And Girls Alike, Will Be Able To Complete A Full Course Of Primary Schooling. **Global Progress:** Lagging.

Greater numbers of children living in developing regions are enrolled in primary education than ever before. The enrolment rate in primary education stands at an impressive 90%. However, there are regional differences. In sub-Saharan Africa the rate of progress in reducing the out-of-school population has stalled, leaving 22% of primary school age children, in that region, out of school. More widely, on current projections, there are concerns that only 68 out of 122 countries will achieve universal primary enrolment by 2015. DFID is committed to working with international effor ts to focus on reaching the most vulnerable, increasing rates of school completion and improving learning outcomes. 

## Mdg 3: Promote Gender Equality And Empower Women Target 3: Eliminate Gender Disparity In Primary And Secondary Education, Preferably By 2005, And In All Levels Of Education No Later Than 2015. Global Progress: Lagging.

Significant progress has been made for girls and women. Globally, more girls go to school, women are living longer, having fewer children and have greater par ticipation in the labour market. However, only 2 
out of 103 countries have achieved the target of gender parity in all levels of education. Progress seen at the star t of the decade has slowed considerably. 31 million girls of primary school age have never been to school. Gender disparities in education increase at secondary level and are most pronounced at ter tiary level as gender-discriminatory social norms and increased education costs prevent girls from staying in school. Some progress is also being made in relation to the propor tion of women in wage employment in the non-agricultural sector. 40 out of 100 wage-earning jobs in the non-agricultural sector are held by women, a significant improvement since 1990. 

## Mdg 4: Reduce Child Mortality Target 4: Between 1990 And 2015, Reduce The Under-5 Mortality Rate By Two-Thirds. Global Progress: Lagging.

 
The majority of child deaths are due to conditions that can be prevented or treated with simple, affordable inter ventions. Globally, the mor tality rate for children under 5 has declined by nearly 50% from 
1990 to 2011. However, despite steady progress, the MDG target is unlikely to be reached without accelerated action to tackle the leading killers in children (newborn deaths 44%, pneumonia 17%, diarrhoea 9% and malaria 7%) and increased effor ts to reduce childhood malnutrition (linked to 45% of child deaths), par ticularly in sub-Saharan Africa where 1 in 9 children die before the age of 5. Newborn mor tality requires par ticular attention, with 1 million children a year not surviving their first day of life. 

## Mdg 5: Improve Maternal Health Target 5.A: Between 1990 And 2015, Reduce The Maternal Mortality Ratio By Three Quarters. Global Progress: Lagging.

Globally the maternal mor tality rate declined by 47% over the past 2 decades, from 400 maternal deaths per 100,000 live bir ths in 1990 to 210 in 2010. All regions have made progress, with the highest reductions in eastern Asia (69%), nor thern Africa (66%) and southern Asia (64%). However, meeting the MDG target of reducing the ratio by three quar ters will require accelerated interventions, improved access to emergency obstetric care, assistance from skilled health personnel at delivery and the provision of antiretroviral therapy to all women who need it. The propor tion of deliveries attended by skilled personnel rose from 55% in 1990 to 66% in 2011. However, in about 46 million of the 135 million live bir ths in 2011, women delivered alone or with inadequate care. Wide disparities are found among regions in the level of skilled attendance at bir th with women in rural areas at a disadvantage. 

## Target 5.B: Achieve, By 2015, Universal Access To Reproductive Health. Global Progress: Lagging.

The need for family planning is slowly being met for more women, but demand is also increasing at a rapid pace. Worldwide, the unmet need for family planning dropped from 15% in 1990 to 12% in 2011, driven by progress in developing regions. Current levels of unmet need range from 4% in eastern Asia to 25% in Oceania and sub-Saharan Africa. This means that 140 million women (married or in union) would like to delay or avoid pregnancy, but are not using contraception. However, by 2015, total demand for family planning among married women is projected to grow to more than 900 million, mostly due to population growth, and remains a considerable challenge. Expanding access to information, counselling and supplies for a wide range of contraceptive methods is essential to meeting the target of universal access to reproductive health. 

## Mdg 6: Combat Hiv/Aids, Malaria And Other Diseases Target 6.A: Have Halted By 2015 And Begun To Reverse The Spread Of Hiv And Aids. Global Progress: Lagging.

UNAIDS 2012 data shows that globally there were 1 million fewer infections in 2012 than in 2001. New HIV infections among children have declined by 52% over the same period. However, there were still 2.3 million new infections with an estimated 35 million people living with HIV, 3.3 million of whom are children, in 2012. HIV infection rates are twice as high in young women aged 15–24 compared to young men, and account for 22% of all new HIV infections. Greater effor ts are needed to prevent and treat HIV 
and TB co-infection, par ticularly in southern and eastern Africa where 50% of tuberculosis (TB) patients are estimated to be living with HIV
. 

## Target 6.B: Achieve Universal Access To Treatment For Hiv/Aids For All Those Who Need It. Global Progress: Not Met.

There has been a 29% decrease in AIDS-related deaths (adults and children) since 2005 due to massive scale-up of antiretroviral therapy. By 2012, nearly 10 million people were on antiretroviral treatment and for many HIV is now a manageable chronic condition. However, due to stigma and discrimination and poorly functioning health systems, at least 16 million people in need of treatment are still not accessing services under new World Health Organization 2013 treatment guidelines. Available treatment for children remains much lower than for adults, with paediatric treatment coverage in sub-Saharan Africa unacceptably low at 34% in 2012. 

## Target 6.C: By 2015, To Have Halted And Begun To Reverse The Incidence Of Malaria And Other Major Disease. Global Progress: On Track.

Malaria cases are estimated to have reduced by 25% globally and 31% in Africa between 2000 and 2012, and progress is faster in countries with lower numbers of cases. Malaria mor tality rates are estimated to have fallen by 42% in all age groups and by 48% in children aged under 5 years. Globally, the target has been met for TB incidence and continues to decline slowly. All regions except Africa and Europe are on track to achieve the Stop TB Par tnership target of a 50% decline in mor tality by 2015. 

However, in 2012 there were an estimated 8.6 million new TB cases (including 1.1 million cases with HIV) and an estimated 1.3 million deaths (including 320,000 people with HIV). 3 million people who developed TB are estimated to be missing out on quality care. The spread of drug resistance poses major threat to malaria and TB progress. There were reductions in incidence for many neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). 700 million people received mass drug administration (MDA) for one or more NTDs in 2012, but only 36% of people requiring MDA worldwide received all the drugs they needed. 

## Mdg 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability Target 7.A: Integrate The Principles Of Sustainable Development Into Country Policies And Programmes And Reverse The Loss Of Environmental Resources. Global Progress: Lagging.*

Natural resource stocks and flows continue to deteriorate with deforestation and unsustainable fishing practices undermining the health of natural assets and presenting a threat to sustainable development. More integrated approaches between agriculture and forest sectors are needed to make real progress in reversing the loss of natural resources, including forests, and to fulfil international commitments related to climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management. Carbon emissions are continuing to increase globally and the rate of growth in global emissions has accelerated, rising 10% from 1990 to 2000 and 33% from 2000 to 2010. Containing the growth in global emissions demands co-ordinated national and international action including concluding negotiations on a global agreement by 2015 to begin implementation in 2020. 

## Target 7.B: Reduce Biodiversity Loss, Achieving, By 2010, A Significant Reduction In The Rate Of Loss. Global Progress: Not Met.

Significant progress has been made since 1990 in increasing the coverage of protected areas dedicated to safeguarding and maintaining biological diversity and natural resources. From 1990 to 2012, protected terrestrial areas grew from 8.9% to 14.6% of the world's land surface. Over the same period, marine protection has more than doubled in coastal waters, from 4.6% to 9.7%. However, biodiversity loss is continuing. All species groups with known trends are deteriorating in status, moving closer to extinction and away from stable populations. Therefore, continued effor ts are needed, in par ticular to improve the effectiveness of the global protected area network. 

## Target 7.C: By 2015, Halve The Proportion Of People Without Sustainable Access To Safe Drinking Water And Basic Sanitation. Global Progress: Water Target Met Ahead Of Schedule. Sanitation Target Lagging.

Achieving the water target in 2010 was a major success. Since 1990, 2.1 billion people gained access to improved drinking water sources. Most of the 768 million people without access live in rural areas, with access lowest in sub-Saharan Africa. To meet the sanitation target, another 1 billion people need to gain access by 2015. There has been significant progress with 1.9 billion people gaining access since 1990, leaving 2.5 billion people without access. The propor tion of the global population practising open defecation has reduced from 24% to 
15% since 1990, but 1.1 billion people still lack access to any form of toilet. South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are the regions where access to sanitation is lowest. 

## Target 7.D: By 2020, To Have Achieved A Significant Improvement In The Lives Of At Least 100 Million Slum Dwellers. Global Progress: Met.

 
Between 2000 and 2010, over 200 million slum dwellers gained improved water sources, sanitation facilities, durable housing or sufficient living space. The propor tion of slum dwellers in developing regions decreased from 39% in 2000 to 33% in 2012. The decline occurred in most regions with eastern Asia, southern Asia and south-eastern Asia achieving the largest percentage decreases. The high propor tion of slum dwellers in sub-Saharan Africa dropped from 65% in 2000 to 62% in 2012. However, the number of slum dwellers, in absolute terms, continues to grow, due in par t to the fast pace of urbanisation, being estimated at 863 million in 2012 compared with 760 million in 2000. 

## Mdg 8: Develop A Global Partnership For Development Target 8.A: Develop Further An Open, Rule-Based, Predictable, Non-Discriminatory Trading And Financial System. Global Progress: Lagging.

Market access for developing and least developed countries (LDCs) has continued to improve although average tariffs for clothing and textiles for LDCs still remain relatively high. Over 98% of impor ts from LDCs are admitted duty free into the EU under its Everything But Arms preference scheme. An historic agreement was reached at the World Trade Organization's (WTO) ninth Ministerial Conference in Bali in December on a package wor th $100 billion. This reconfirms the WTO's relevance with the first multilateral deal in 20 years. It will also inject fresh momentum into resolving some of the remaining issues in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which are critical for developing countries.  

## Target 8.B: Address The Special Needs Of The Least Developed Countries. Global Progress: Lagging.

From 2010 to 2012 there had been a year on year reduction in net bilateral official development assistance (ODA) flow to LDCs. This trend has been reversed in 2013 with a 12.3% increase in real terms from 2012 to 2013. This increase is encouraging but it should be noted that there was exceptional debt relief to Burma in 2013. ODA to LDCs had increased from a low of 0.05% of total donors' Gross National Income (GNI) in the late 1990s to 0.11% in 2010. However, the trend has reversed in recent years, decreasing to 0.10% in 2011 and 0.09% in 2012. Figures on ODA to LDCs as a propor tion of donors' 
GNI are not yet available for 2013. 

## Target 8.C: Address The Special Needs Of Landlocked Developing Countries And Small Island Developing States. Global Progress: Lagging.

Progress has been mixed on this target. ODA spend on landlocked developing countries fell in 2010 and again in 2011. However, assistance to small island developing states increased substantially. Assistance to sub-Saharan Africa plays a large par t in achieving this MDG since the region hosts 14 of the world's 
31 landlocked developing countries. Bilateral aid to this region fell by 4% in real terms from 2012 to 2013. 

## Target 8.D: Deal Comprehensively With The Debt Problems Of Developing Countries Through National And International Measures And Make Debt Sustainable In The Long Term. Global Progress: On Track.

Of the 39 countries eligible or potentially eligible for Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative assistance, 35 have received debt relief from Paris Club bilateral creditors and International Financial Institutions including the IMF and World Bank. This has resulted in reductions in debt ser vicing and increases in pover ty reducing expenditure. The international community is focused on ensuring that the remaining 4 countries are able to access debt relief under HIPC in line with the requirements. The IMF and World Bank have been monitoring and suppor ting debt sustainability in low income countries through the joint Debt Sustainability Framework which helps guide countries and donors in mobilising the financing of low income countries' development needs, while reducing the chances of an excessive build-up of debt in the future. For those countries which have received debt relief the focus must now be on maintaining the gains by keeping debt levels sustainable. DFID has continued to suppor t HM Treasury's lead on debt issues, suppor ting eligible countries' 
progress through the internationally agreed HIPC Initiative. 

## Target 8.E: In Co-Operation With Pharmaceutical Companies, Provide Access To Affordable Essential Drugs In Developing Countries. Global Progress: Lagging.

Resources to suppor t the provision of essential medicines through some disease-specific global health funds increased in 2013. Drug donations to treat neglected tropical diseases also increased. However, availability of essential medicines remains low across developing countries with large inequalities in the availability and quality of generics across countries. Data indicates a minor improvement in effor ts to bring the price of essential medicines in developing countries in line with international reference prices. 

## Target 8.F: In Co-Operation With The Private Sector, Make Available The Benefits Of New Technologies, Especially Information And Communications. Global Progress: Lagging.

Growing infrastructure in information and communications technology, including mobile-broadband networks, along with social media, innovative applications and falling prices for services continue to drive internet uptake in all regions of the world. However, major regional differences remain. In the developing world, 31% of the population are online, compared to 77% in the developed world. Sub-Saharan Africa, where less than 20% of the population are using the internet, remains the region with the lowest penetration rate. Both the number of fixed and mobile-broadband subscriptions in developing countries surpassed those in developed countries. But penetration rates lag seriously behind. While developed countries have fixed and mobile-broadband penetration rates of 27% and 75% respectively, rates for developing countries stood at 6% for fixed and 20% for mobile-broadband subscriptions. In sub-Saharan Africa, fixedbroadband penetration is below 1%. Besides differences in penetration rates, major disparities remain in the coverage, price and quality of broadband services. The limited availability of international internet bandwidth and backbone infrastructure in many developing countries continues to pose challenges. Despite a significant drop in prices, the cost of broadband access in relation to average income remains far too high for most in developing countries. More effor ts must be made to make broadband available, affordable and truly high-speed for all. 

## Level 2: Dfid'S Contribution To Development Results

2.8  
The indicators in level 2 of DFID's Results Framework measure the outputs that can be directly linked to DFID programmes and projects whether delivered through bilateral country programmes, or through contributions to multilateral organisations. The bilateral indicators were selected primarily through analysis of expected results set out in individual DFID country Operational Plans, while the 
multilateral indicators capture key outputs as repor 
ted by the multilateral organisations themselves. 
The multilateral results are presented alongside the UK's funding share of the multilateral organisation, in order to show the extent of the UK's contribution. 
2.9  
It is impor 
tant to note that the indicators in level 2 of the Results Framework reflect those outputs 
where it is possible to aggregate results across different countries and so do not capture all the results that DFID is delivering. Results that are vital to each country's development may not be covered here simply because they cannot be aggregated across countries. Chapter 3 provides a summary of the headline results delivered through each country and regional programme, reflecting the priorities and operational context in each area. A fuller set of results are set out in the individual country Operational Plans, published on the GOV
.UK website. 

## Progress Towards Dfid'S Results Commitments

2.10  DFID has made a number of results commitments, setting out the results that UK investment in 
development will deliver by 2015. These targets were initially set out in 'UK aid: Changing lives, 
delivering results'7 and in some cases have been updated with subsequent announcements. This 
repor 
t presents the progress that has been made towards the 2015 targets. Some highlights are 
summarised below. 
2.11  By 2013–14, the UK had suppor 
ted: 
- 6.7 million people with cash transfer programmes, meeting our target of 6 million - 3.6 million bir 
ths delivered with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors, meeting the target of 
 
2 million 
- 85.8 million people to hold their authorities to account and have a say in their community's 
development, meeting the target of 40 million 
- 54.4 million people with access to financial ser 
vices, providing the means to help suppor 
t people 
to work their way out of pover 
ty, meeting the target of 50 million 
- 
 43.1 million people with access to a water, sanitation or hygiene intervention 
- 
 19.3 million children under 5 or pregnant women with nutrition programmes. 
2.12  A shor 
t summary of the results achieved is now presented for each of the following sectors, showing 
progress towards DFID's commitments for each indicator in level 2 of the Results Framework. 
- 
 Wealth creation 
- 
 Pover 
ty, vulnerability, nutrition and hunger 
- 
 Education 
- 
 Water, sanitation and hygiene 
- 
 Humanitarian assistance 
- 
 Governance and security 
- 
 Climate change 
- 
 Health. 
Some technical notes to be aware of when using the results estimates are provided in Figure 2.5 and the multilateral acronyms used in the tables are explained in Figure 2.6. 

## Results Achieved By Sector - Wealth Creation

Two impor tant aspects of wealth creation are an individual's ability to access financial ser vices and their ability to have secure rights over their land and other proper ty. 

An estimated 2.5 billion adults do not have access to formal financial services. A World Bank-Gallup survey in 148 countries in 2012 repor ted that 76% of adults in sub-Saharan Africa and 67% of adults in south Asia do not have access to formal financial ser vices, compared to only 11% in high income countries. In low income countries, women, on average, are 10% less likely than men to have access to formal financial ser vices while people living in rural areas are nearly 15% less likely to have access than their urban counterpar ts. Lack of access to formal services including borrowing, saving, payments or insurance hinders the ability of poor people to star t or grow small businesses, smooth their consumption, build assets and withstand shocks such as ill health or natural disasters. By improving access to finance, evidence8 shows this can raise incomes and help suppor t people to work their way out of pover ty. 

Some 75% of the world's population do not hold legally enforceable rights to the land they live and work on. In sub-Saharan Africa alone, over half the population live on less than £1 a day and less than 10% of the rural land is legally registered. There is strong evidence that the responsible governance of tenure of land and other natural resources is an essential component for achieving sustainable development and pover ty eradication. Indeed, findings from a recently published DFID Evidence Paper9 on securing proper ty rights found "evidence of a strong association between secure proper ty rights, long-term economic growth and sustainable pover ty reduction, where impor tant complementary measures (e.g. infrastructure, access to credit and agricultural inputs) were in place". Consequently, as a key economic institution, proper ty rights and their protection sit at the hear t of the UK's 'golden thread' vision for international development and pover ty reduction. 

## Dfid Commitment

In 'UK aid: Changing lives, delivering results' DFID has a commitment to provide more than 50 million people with access to financial ser vices to help them work their way out of pover ty by March 2015. DFID has also committed to secure the right to land and proper ty for more than 6 million people, of whom 50% will be women, by March 
2015. DFID's Strategic Vision for Girls and Women made a fur ther and more ambitious commitment to secure access to land for 4.5 million women. 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

There are 2 wealth creation indicators included in the DFID Results Framework to measure progress: 

 
- Number of people with access to financial ser 
vices as a result of DFID suppor 
t 
 
- Number of people suppor 
ted through DFID to improve their rights to land and proper 
ty 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results: 

- Supported an estimated 54.4 million people to gain access to financial services - Helped 1.6 million people to secure their land and property rights 
The results for the financial access indicator come from a variety of financial sector development programmes focusing on direct delivery of financial services to the unbanked and on development of markets for financial ser vices with a view to paving the way for the private sector to ser ve the needs of the poor. The indicator is not a direct measure of pover ty but rather a measure of access to financial services such as credit, savings/deposits, insurance, leasing and transfer payments. The data mainly focuses on bilateral activities but in the case of multidonor funded programmes, results are attributed to DFID on the basis of DFID's share in the total programme cost. DFID is committed to scaling up programmes that improve the security of land tenure rights in developing countries, par ticularly for women and girls. The programmes contributing to this indicator tackle specific challenges to the security of rights to land and proper ty, especially for the poor. For example, the lack of up to date and collectable land use and ownership information; the lack of delimitation or registration of communal land; or the lack of recognition of women's user and ownership rights. All of these make it more difficult for individuals and communities to get a good return from their assets. 

 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Indicator                                      | Indicator    | Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive    |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------------------------------------|
| type                                           |              |                                             |
| Male                                           | Female       | Not                                         |
| identified                                     |              |                                             |
| Number of people with access to financial      |              |                                             |
| services as a result of DFID support*          |              |                                             |
| Peak year                                      | 27,073,000   | 26,912,000                                  |
| 54,450,000                                     |              |                                             |
| Cumulative                                     | 765,000      | 739,000                                     |
| 1,570,000                                      |              |                                             |
| Number of people supported through DFID        |              |                                             |
| programmes to improve their rights to land and |              |                                             |
| property                                       |              |                                             |

* Results achieved through both multilateral and bilateral channels. 

## Results Achieved By Country

The largest contributor to the financial access indicator is DFID's Private Sector Depar tment (PSD) which provides central funding to programmes operating in a wide range of countries. With regard to improvements to land and proper ty rights, the highest number of people suppor ted has been in India and Nepal with 85% of the results delivered in these countries. 

## Number Of People With Access To Financial Services As A Result Of Dfid Support Number Of People Supported Through Dfid Programmes To Improve Their Rights To Land And Property

*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results,  
and includes Tanzania, Bangladesh, Middle East and North Africa  
Department Regional, multilateral organisations, Burma, Rwanda,  
Uganda, South Africa, Sudan, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe,  
Malawi, Central Asia and Nepal.  

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations, and fall broadly within the wealth creation sector. These indicators were included in the multilateral section of DFID's Results Framework. The results presented here are based on all funding that the multilateral receives, not just funding from DFID or the UK. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results. 

| Indicator                                                    | Multilateral    | Reporting    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------|
| period                                                       |                 |              |
| Number of microfinance accounts opened or end borrowers      |                 |              |
| reached                                                      |                 |              |
| AsDB                                                         | 2013            | 831,000      |
|                                                              |                 |              |
| Number of micro/small/medium productive enterprises financed | IADB            | 2013         |
| Number of active borrowers in microfinance                   | IFAD            | 2012         |
| Number of voluntary savers                                   | IFAD            | 2012         |
| Number of housing loans                                      | IFC             | FY 2012–13   |
| Number of microfinance and SME loans                         | IFC             | FY 2012–13   |
| Number of long term jobs created                             | PIDG            |              |
| Cumulative                                                   |                 |              |
| data to 2013                                                 |                 |              |
| 188,000                                                      | 67              |              |
Total 
| Latest result    |
|------------------|
| contribution     |
| as a % of        |
| total core       |
| funding          |

## Results Achieved By Sector - Pover Ty, Vulnerability, Nutrition And Hunger

About 700 million fewer people lived in extreme pover ty conditions in 2010 compared to 1990. Despite this fall, around 1.2 billion people live in extreme pover ty.10 If we are to break the cycle of pover ty, we need to address the most pressing need of all - hunger. Today, 1 in 8 people in the world remain chronically undernourished. Hunger and malnutrition rob children of their life chances - making them much more likely to become ill, limiting brain development and stunting growth. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) include 2 targets in this area. The first is to halve, by 2015, the propor tion of people whose income is less than $1.25 a day. This target was met 5 years ahead of the deadline, and the global pover ty rate had fallen by 2010 to less than half the rate in 1990. However, more than 1.2 billion people globally still live in extreme pover ty. The second target is to halve, by 2015, the propor tion of people who suffer from hunger. The world is on track to reach the hunger target by 2015, but globally about 870 million people are still estimated to be undernourished, and in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia hunger and undernutrition remain unacceptably high. 

## Dfid Commitment

DFID has 3 specific commitments within this sector: 

- Help more than 6 million of the world's poorest people to escape extreme pover 
ty by March 2015 
- Stop 20 million more children going hungry by December 2015 
- 
 Ensure that another 3 million people have enough food throughout the year by March 2015 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

There are 3 indicators included in the DFID Results Framework to measure progress on results achieved in this sector through DFID suppor t: 

- Number of people benefiting from DFID-suppor 
ted cash transfer programmes 
- 
 Number of children under 5 and pregnant women reached through DFID's nutrition-relevant programmes 
- 
 Number of people achieving food security through DFID suppor 
t 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results: 

- Supported 6.7 million people with cash transfer programmes 
- 
 Reached 19.3 million children under 5 and pregnant women through DFID's nutrition-relevant programmes 
- 
 Provided food security to 2.5 million people 


For 2 of the indicators in this sector
, 'number of people benefiting from DFID-supported cash transfer programmes' 
and 'number of people achieving food security through DFID support', results have been delivered solely through DFID's bilateral programme. For the indicator 'number of children under 5 and pregnant women reached through DFID's nutrition-relevant programmes', the majority of results have been delivered through DFID's bilateral programme but some have been delivered through core funding to UNICEF and the World Food Programme. 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive         | Indicator           | Indicator    |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------|
| type                                             |                     |              |
| Total                                            |                     |              |
| Male                                             | Female              | Not          |
| identified                                       |                     |              |
| Number of people benefiting from DFID-supported  |                     |              |
| cash transfer programmes                         |                     |              |
| Peak year                                        | 2,606,000 3,296,000 | 752,000      |
| 6,655,000                                        |                     |              |
| Peak year                                        | 4,496,000 6,148,000 | 8,661,000    |
| 19,305,000                                       |                     |              |
| Number of children under 5 and pregnant women    |                     |              |
| reached through DFID's nutrition-relevant        |                     |              |
| programmes*                                      |                     |              |
| Number of people achieving food security through |                     |              |
| DFID support                                     |                     |              |
| Peak year                                        | 1,170,000 1,302,000 | 0            |
| 2,472,000                                        |                     |              |

* Results achieved through both multilateral and bilateral channels. 

## Results Achieved By Country

Each of the 3 indicators in this sector has very different geographical coverage. Close to two thirds of all people benefiting from cash transfer programmes lived in Bangladesh, Pakistan or Ethiopia. There were also significant numbers living in Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, as well as smaller numbers in 6 other DFID priority countries, mainly within sub-Saharan Africa. The number of children under 5 and pregnant women who were reached by DFID's nutrition programmes was spread more evenly across countries, mainly in Africa. As well as a significant number of beneficiaries in Nigeria, India, Ethiopia and Mozambique, children and pregnant women in Zambia, Bangladesh and other DFID priority countries (within Africa and Western Asia) also benefited from nutrition programmes. Three quarters of people achieving food security through DFID support lived in Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. The remaining quarter of beneficiaries lived in Burma or Ethiopia.

## Number Of People Benefiting From Dfid-Supported Cash Transfer Programmes

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive
*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, and includes Zambia, Zimbabwe, Ghana, Mozambique, Yemen and South Sudan.

## Number Of People Achieving Food Security Through Dfid Support

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations, and fall broadly within the poverty, vulnerability, nutrition and hunger sector. These indicators were included in the multilateral section of DFID's Results Framework. The results presented here are based on all funding that the multilateral receives, not just funding from DFID or the UK. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results.

| Indicator                                       | Multilateral   |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| Reporting                                       |                |
| period                                          |                |
| Number of farmers given access to improved      |                |
| agricultural services and investment            |                |
| Number of people receiving services from        |                |
| International Fund for Agricultural Development |                |
| supported projects                              |                |
| Number of people trained in crop production     |                |
| practices/technologies                          |                |
| Number of malnourished children provided with   |                |
| special nutritional support                     |                |
| Number of people provided with food             | WFP            |
| Number of school children receiving school meal |                |
| and take home rations                           |                |
| Number of women and children provided with food |                |
|                                                 |                |
| and nutritional support                         |                |

## Number Of Children Under 5 And Pregnant Women Reached Through Dfid'S Nutritionrelevant Programmes

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive
*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, and includes Yemen, Nepal, Malawi, Somalia, Kenya, Uganda and multilateral organisations.

| Latest result        |   DFID's contribution  |
|----------------------|------------------------|
| as a % of total core |                        |
| funding              |                        |
| IADB                 |                   2013 |
| IFAD                 |                   2012 |
| IFAD                 |                   2012 |
| WFP                  |                   2012 |
| WFP                  |                   2012 |
| WFP                  |                   2012 |
| 31                   |                        |

## Results Achieved By Sector - Education

A good education is a human right, a global public good and a necessary ingredient for economic development and pover ty reduction. Education enables people to live healthier and more productive lives. The UK government is committed to helping to ensure that every girl and boy can access and complete a good quality basic education.11 The MDGs include a target to ensure by 2015 that children everywhere will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling. Significant progress has been made on getting children into school with the number of children out of school dropping from 108 million in 1999 to 57 million in 2013. This progress shows what sustained national and international investment can achieve but more needs to be done - and done differently - to ensure all girls and boys are not just in school but learning while there. It is estimated that there are at least 250 million children who cannot read or count, even if they have spent 4 years in school. Learning is a vital and measurable dimension of a quality education and is at the hear t of DFID's education programming. 

## Dfid Commitments

DFID has made the following commitments: 

- To suppor 
t 11 million girls and boys in primary and secondary schools by March 2015, including at least 
4.5 million in primary12 and 700,000 girls in secondary school13 
- To train more than 190,000 teachers14 and improve the quality of education and children's learning15 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

There are 4 education indicators used to measure progress on ensuring boys and girls can access and complete a good quality basic education: 

 
- Number of children suppor 
ted by DFID in primary education (per annum), by sex16 
 
- Number of children suppor 
ted by DFID in lower secondary education (per annum), by sex 
 
- Number of children completing primary education suppor 
ted by DFID (per annum), by sex 
 
- Number of teachers trained17 
The first 2 indicators provide estimates of the number of children which DFID fully funds to be enrolled in primary and lower secondary school, or the number of children which we can demonstrate would not be in school, or not learning at all, without DFID suppor t. 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results: 

- 
 Supported 10.2 million children in primary and lower secondary school - including 4.1 million girls in primary 
school and 729,000 girls in lower secondary school 
- Supported 1.4 million children, including 710,000 girls, to complete primary school - this result is based on 
the number of children completing primary school education suppor 
ted by DFID (per annum) and uses the 
number of new entrants to the last grade of primary education as an estimate for those completing primary school 
- 
 Through multilateral channels, DFID supported the training of 123,000 teachers 
It should be noted that these results do not represent the full reach of DFID's investments in education. Some significant DFID education investments, including (for example) some technical assistance and suppor t for improved education data, as well as training teachers, are not reflected in these results. The results above also do not include children supported through global or multilateral programmes such as the Girls' Education Challenge Fund and the Global Par tnership for Education. 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Indicator                                       | Indicator type    | Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive    |
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Number of children supported by DFID in primary |                   |                                             |
| and lower secondary education (per annum)       |                   |                                             |
| Peak year                                       | 5,321,000         | 4,874,000                                   |
| 10,195,000                                      |                   |                                             |
| Number of children completing primary education |                   |                                             |
| supported by DFID (per annum)                   |                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                      | 705,000           | 712,000                                     |
| 1,417,000                                       |                   |                                             |
| Number of teachers trained**                    |                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                      | 0                 | 0                                           |
| 123,000                                         |                   |                                             |

** Results achieved through multilateral channels only. 

## Results Achieved By Country

The highest numbers of children suppor ted in primary and lower secondary school by the end of 2013–14 
were in Ethiopia (2.8 million), India (1.4 million), South Sudan (1.2 million), Pakistan (1.1 million) and Bangladesh (0.8 million). These 5 country programmes accounted for 72% of the overall 10.2 million figure. The remaining 16 country programmes (and one centrally managed programme) each account for around 5% or less of the overall 10 million figure. 

## Number Of Children Supported In Primary And Lower Secondary Education By Country

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 

Ethiopia 27.1% India 13.7% South Sudan 12.2% Pakistan 10.5% Bangladesh 8.1% Malawi 5.0%  

Tanzania 5.0% Other* 18.4%  

*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results,  
and includes Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Mozambique, Nigeria,  
Zimbabwe, Ghana, Vietnam, Zambia, Burundi, the Occupied  
Palestinian Territories, Nepal, Yemen, Civil Society Department,  
Uganda and Kenya.  

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations, and fall broadly within the education sector. These indicators were included in the multilateral section of DFID's Results Framework. The results presented here are based on all funding that the multilateral receives, not just funding from DFID or the UK. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results. 

Indicator 
Multilateral 
Reporting 
period 
Number of teachers trained 
AsDB 
2013 
515,000 
5 
Number of teachers trained 
GPE 
2012 
61,000 
24 
Number of teachers trained 
IADB 
2013 
120,000 
2 
Number of teachers recruited or trained 
IDA FY 2012–13 
1,100,000 
11 
Number of education ministry officials trained and coached in strategic planning and management 
UNESCO 
2012 
1,400 
6 
Total 
Male 
Female 
Not 
identified 
Latest result 
DFID's 
contribution 
as a % of total 
core funding 

## Results Achieved By Sector - Water, Sanitation And Hygiene

Sustained utilisation of safe drinking water and hygienic latrines together with habitual hand washing with water and soap is effective in reducing diarrhoea and could prevent almost 1.4 million unnecessary child deaths every year.18 The MDGs include a target to halve, by 2015, the propor tion of the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation. The target has been met for water but an estimated 768 million people still did not use an improved source of drinking water in 2011. The world is off track on the sanitation target and by the end of 2011, 2.5 billion people lacked access to an improved sanitation facility.19 

## Dfid Commitment

DFID has a commitment to reach 60 million people through its water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) programmes by December 2015. This commitment was made at the Sanitation and Water for All (SWA) High Level Meeting in 2012. This superseded 3 separate targets for our water, sanitation and hygiene programmes, which were included in DFID's 'UK aid: Changing lives, delivering results'20 publication. 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

 
There are 4 WASH indicators included in the DFID Results Framework to measure progress on the number of people reached with these basic services through DFID suppor t: 

- Number of unique people reached with one or more water, sanitation or hygiene promotion intervention - Number of people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources through DFID suppor 
t 
- 
 Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility through DFID suppor 
t 
- 
 Number of people reached with access to improved hygiene through DFID suppor 
t to hygiene promotion 
The first of these indicators tracks progress on DFID's commitment to reach 60 million through our WASH 
programmes by December 201521. This provides a measure of the number of people reached through DFID's WASH programmes. Each person may be reached with one, two or all three of water, sanitation or hygiene inter ventions. The indicator methodology ensures that each person is only counted once. 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following: 

 
- Supported over 43 million people to access clean water, better sanitation or improved hygiene conditions 
through DFID's WASH programmes 
The number of people reached with each of the 3 separate types of intervention by 2013–14 through DFID suppor t were: 

- 
 14.8 million people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources 
- 
 14.5 million people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility 
- 
 29.4 million people with access to improved hygiene 
The majority of these results contributing to DFID's commitment (around 80%) have been delivered through DFID's bilateral programme but some results are delivered through core funding to multilaterals (around 20%), primarily the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA), but also through the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Asian Development Bank (AsDB) and the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB). 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Indicator                                            | Indicator                                         | Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive    |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| type                                                 |                                                   |                                             |
|                                                      | Number of unique people reached with one or more  |                                             |
| water, sanitation or hygiene promotion intervention* |                                                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                           | 16,359,000                                        | 16,058,000 10,681,000                       |
| 43,099,000                                           |                                                   |                                             |
|                                                      | Number of people with sustainable access to clean |                                             |
| drinking water sources through DFID support ***      |                                                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                           | 5,722,000                                         | 5,510,000                                   |
| 14,767,000                                           |                                                   |                                             |
|                                                      | Number of people with sustainable access to an    |                                             |
| improved sanitation facility through DFID support*** |                                                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                           |                                                   |                                             |
| 6,452,000                                            | 6,396,000                                         | 1,651,000                                   |
| 14,499,000                                           |                                                   |                                             |
|                                                      | Number of people with access to improved hygiene  |                                             |
| through DFID support to hygiene promotion***         |                                                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                                           | 14,175,000                                        | 14,099,000                                  |
| 29,454,000                                           |                                                   |                                             |

* Results achieved through both multilateral and bilateral channels. *** These results reflect bilateral results only. In addition the three sub-indicators do not sum to the headline indicator because of double counts. 

## Results Achieved By Country

The highest numbers of people reached with one or more water, sanitation or hygiene promotion interventions were in Bangladesh (9.3 million), Nigeria (3.7 million), Zambia (3.3 million), Sierra Leone (3.3 million), Ethiopia (3.1 million), Pakistan (1.9 million), India (1.9 million) and Tanzania (1.6 million). Most of these larger programmes are delivered through UNICEF and par tner governments. The other 10 country programmes, in addition to 2 
regional programmes and 4 centrally managed programmes from DFID HQ, each account for around 4% or less of the overall 43 million figure. 

## Number Of Unique People Reached With One Or More Water, Sanitation Or Hygiene Promotion Intervention Results Achieved Up To 2013–14 Inclusive

Bangladesh 21.5% Multilaterals 15.9% Nigeria 8.5% Zambia 7.7% Sierra Leone 7.6% 
Ethiopia 7.2% 
Pakistan 4.5% India 4.3% Other* 22.8% 

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations, and fall broadly within the water, sanitation and hygiene sector. The results presented here are based on all funding that the multilateral receives, not just funding from DFID or the UK. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results. 

Indicator 
Multilateral 
Reporting 
period 
Number of people with new or improved access to water and sanitation 
AfDB 
2013 
921,000 
12 
Number of new households served with water supply 
AsDB 
2013 
1,003,000 
5 
Number of households with access to water supply and sanitation 
CDB 
2013 
4,000 
22 
Number of households with new or upgraded sanitary connections 
IADB 
2013 
392,000 
2 
Number of people with access to clean drinking water 
IDA FY 2012–13 
40,100,000 
11 
 
 
Number of people with access to improved sanitation facilities 
IDA FY 2012–13 
4,300,000 
11 
Total 
Male 
Female 
Not 
identified 

*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, 
and includes Tanzania, Middle East and North Africa Department 
Regional, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Zimbabwe, 
Yemen, Nepal, Private Sector Department, Malawi, Human 
Development Department, Civil Society Department, Africa 
Regional, Mozambique, Vietnam, Research and Evidence 
Division, South Sudan and Uganda. 

| Latest result    |
|------------------|
| contribution     |
| as a % of total  |
| core funding     |
|                  |
|                  |

## Results Achieved By Sector - Humanitarian Assistance

DFID leads the UK government's response to humanitarian emergencies throughout the world, responding rapidly and decisively to save lives. 

The Humanitarian Emergency Response Review22 (HERR) recommended how the UK could better deliver a response fit to deal with the challenges of the 21st century, based around 7 key themes: Anticipation, Resilience, Leadership, Innovation, Accountability, Par tnership and Humanitarian space. DFID continues to improve and reinforce the UK response to humanitarian emergencies, in line with the recommendations of the HERR. 

## Dfid Commitment

By its nature, humanitarian assistance is reactive to unplanned events; therefore DFID has no specific targets for the amount of humanitarian assistance to be delivered. Instead, DFID focuses on delivering the best possible humanitarian assistance to people in need. 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

There is one humanitarian assistance indicator included in the DFID Results Framework: 

 
- Number of people reached with emergency food assistance through DFID suppor 
t. 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following: 

 
- Reached over 11 million people with emergency food assistance. 

## In Addition:

 
- Following Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines DFID suppor 
ted more than a million people. 
 
- In the Sahel, DFID is providing suppor 
t to communities facing food insecurity, malnutrition and those affected 
by conflict. This suppor 
t is expected to benefit over 1.6 million people across the region in 2013–14. 
 
- The UK is providing humanitarian assistance in the Central African Republic in response to a severe escalation 
in the crisis. Suppor 
t is provided through the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), non­
governmental organisations (NGOs) and UN agencies in emergency healthcare, clean water, food security and logistics and is expected to benefit over 100,000 people. 
 
- In October 2013 after Cyclone Phailin in Odisha, India, DFID suppor 
ted 200,000 people with clean water, basic 
shelter and other essential items such as blankets and cooking utensils, with a focus on the most vulnerable including women and girls. 
 
- Following the flooding in Uttarakhand in India in July 2013, DFID provided suppor 
t to 15,000 of the most  
vulnerable people including essential food and water, and bedding and basic shelter materials.  
 
- In Haiti, DFID provided rental suppor 
t cash grants to 2,195 households, enabling them to leave camps and 
return to their communities of origin in a secure and dignified manner. DFID is also helping Haiti to develop greater resilience to natural disasters, so that when the next disaster hits, Haiti will be better able to cope. 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

|                                   | Indicator    | Indicator type    | Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive    |
|-----------------------------------|--------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Cumulative                        | 4,158,000    | 4,234,000         | 2,958,000                                   |
| 11,351,000                        |              |                   |                                             |
| Number of people reached with     |              |                   |                                             |
| emergency food assistance through |              |                   |                                             |
| DFID support                      |              |                   |                                             |

## Results Achieved By Country

The highest numbers of people have been reached through programmes in Ethiopia (2.6 million), Afghanistan (2.1 million), Pakistan (1.2 million), Somalia (0.7 million) and Malawi (0.5 million). Programmes running in multiple African countries (Africa Regional) have reached a fur ther 2.4 million people (which includes 0.5 million people in Ethiopia, 0.4 million in Malawi, 0.3 million in Kenya and 0.2 million each in Mali and Chad). 

| Male    |
|---------|
| Total   |

## Number Of People Reached With Emergency Food Assistance Through Dfid Support

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive Ethiopia 23.0% Africa Regional Department 20.7% Afghanistan 18.3% Pakistan 10.2% Somalia 6.2% Malawi 5.2%  
Middle East and North Africa Department Regional 4.4%  
Yemen 4.3% Other* 7.6%  

*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results,  
and includes Kenya, Uganda, the Democratic Republic of  
Congo, Bangladesh, Tanzania, South Africa and Civil Society  
Department.  

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations' humanitarian assistance projects, which may also be funded by other countries or agencies. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results. 

| Indicator                                                   | Multilateral    | Reporting    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------|
| period                                                      |                 |              |
| Number of people benefiting from disaster preparedness      |                 |              |
| activities                                                  |                 |              |
| ECHO                                                        | 2013            | 18,000,000   |
| Number of people provided with humanitarian assistance      | ECHO            | 2013         |
| Number of civilians provided with essential household items | ICRC            | 2013         |
| Number of detainees visited                                 | ICRC            | 2013         |
| Number of migrants, internally displaced persons, refugees  |                 |              |
| and other vulnerable groups receiving emergency, migration  |                 |              |
| and durable support (eg shelter)                            |                 |              |
| Number of displaced people (refugees and internally         |                 |              |
| displaced people) receiving protection or assistance        |                 |              |
| UNHCR                                                       | 2013            | 35,600,000   |
| Number of severely malnourished children aged 6–59          |                 |              |
| months reached with therapeutic feeding programmes          |                 |              |
| UNICEF                                                      | 2013            | 2,400,000    |
| Latest result    |   DFID's  |
|------------------|-----------|
| contribution     |           |
| as a % of        |           |
| total core       |           |
| funding          |           |
| IOM              |     2013  |

## Results Achieved By Sector - Governance And Security

DFID will tackle the underlying causes of pover ty by suppor ting strong and inclusive economic, social and political institutions and empowered citizens. Effective policing, a legal system that can be trusted, local ser vices and the right to vote are among the key building blocks of any stable and prosperous society. Without them, it is difficult for a country to educate its children, grow its economy or build a healthcare system. By suppor ting more governments to put them in place, we can help them meet their people's needs. In the long term this means we are spending now to save later, as countries reach a point where they can stand on their own two feet. The impor tance of governance and security is recognised in the Millennium Declaration23 (September 2000): 
"We will spare no effor t to promote democracy and strengthen the rule of law, as well as respect for all internationally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to development." The May 2013 repor t24 of the High Level Panel on the post-2015 Development Agenda co-chaired by David Cameron has fur ther reinforced this message: 
"Freedom from fear, conflict and violence is the most fundamental human right, and the essential foundation for building peaceful and prosperous societies. At the same time, people the world over expect their governments to be honest, accountable, and responsive to their needs." 

## Dfid Commitments

The results commitments relating to this sector were all announced in the publication 'UK aid: Changing lives, delivering results'25 and are as follows. 

 
- We will suppor 
t freer and fairer elections in 13 countries with more than 300 million voters 
 
- We will suppor 
t 40 million people to hold authorities to account 
 
- We will help 10 million women to access justice through the cour 
ts, police and legal assistance 
In addition the commitment on access to justice for women and girls is reiterated in DFID's Strategic Vision for Girls and Women. The end date for each of the commitments is March 2015. 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

For governance and security there are 4 indicators in level 2 of the DFID Results Framework of which the first 2 are very closely related: 

 
- Number of people who vote in elections suppor 
ted by DFID 
 
- Number of countries suppor 
ted by DFID in freer and fairer elections 
 
- Number of people suppor 
ted to have choice and control over their own development and to hold decision 
makers to account 
 
- Number of women and girls with improved access to security and justice ser 
vices through DFID suppor 
t 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14 DFID had achieved the following results: 

 
- Supported elections in 11 countries in which 144.7 million people voted - Supported 85.8 million people to have choice and control over their own development and to hold decision 
makers to account 
 
- Improved access to security and justice services for 10.8 million women and girls 


There are 48 projects which suppor t people to have choice and control over their own development and to hold decision makers to account. The suppor t varies by context and includes building awareness among citizens on the services they should be able to expect from their governments, suppor ting people to meet and discuss issues with their elected representatives, and helping men and women to par ticipate in community decision-making processes. 

Bilateral programmes help to improve access to security and justice services for women by suppor ting nationally owned reform of security and justice institutions such as the police, prosecutions and the judiciary; increasing awareness and availability of community legal services; building par tnerships between communities and service providers; and ensuring effective responses to violence against women and girls. There are no results arising from DFID core funding of multilateral organisations that contribute to these indicators at level 2 of the DFID Results Framework. Neither are there other headline results achieved by multilateral organisations that would relate to this pillar. 

## Progress Towards Dfid'S Results Commitments

The electoral events suppor ted in 2013–14 were in Mozambique, Zimbabwe (constitutional referendum), Nepal and Pakistan. Progress on this indicator depends significantly on the timing of elections in par tner countries which is not determined by DFID. 

The target to suppor t 40 million people to hold authorities to account has been exceeded. An impor tant factor in this is the strong performance of a centrally managed project to meet the information needs of the world's poorest people (delivered by BBC Media Action). 

| Indicator                                  | Indicator             | Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive    |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| type                                       |                       |                                             |
| Male                                       | Female Not identified |                                             |
| Total                                      |                       |                                             |
| Number of people who vote in elections     |                       |                                             |
| supported by DFID                          |                       |                                             |
| Cumulative                                 | 43,257,000            | 30,208,000                                  |
| 144,653,000                                |                       |                                             |
| Number of countries supported by DFID in   |                       |                                             |
| freer and fairer elections                 |                       |                                             |
| Cumulative                                 | N/A                   | N/A                                         |
| 11                                         |                       |                                             |
| Peak year                                  | 45,105,000            | 33,688,000                                  |
| 85,806,000                                 |                       |                                             |
| Number of people supported to have choice  |                       |                                             |
| and control over their own development and |                       |                                             |
| to hold decision makers to account         |                       |                                             |
| Peak year                                  | N/A                   | 10,778,000                                  |
| 10,778,000                                 |                       |                                             |
| Number of women and girls with improved    |                       |                                             |
| access to security and justice services    |                       |                                             |
| through DFID support                       |                       |                                             |

## Results Achieved By Country

The elections with most voters have been in Pakistan (47 million) and Nigeria (40 million). The single largest contribution (52 million) to the indicator on suppor ting people to have choice and control is from a centrally managed project delivered by BBC Media Action. Those results are in turn delivered in Bangladesh, Burma, Kenya, Nepal, Nigeria, the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Sierra Leone. In terms of girls' and women's improved access to justice and security, results have been achieved in a number of countries including Bangladesh, Sudan, the Caribbean, the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal, Uganda, Zimbabwe and Somalia. 

## Number Of People Who Vote In Elections

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 
*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, and includes Zimbabwe, Zambia, Sierra Leone and Mozambique. 

## Number Of Women And Girls With Improved Access To Security And Justice Services

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 

## Number Of People Supported To Have Choice And Control Over Their Own Development

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 

*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, 
and includes Ethiopia, Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of 
Congo, Africa Regional, Nigeria, Caribbean, Pakistan, Sudan, 
Bangladesh, Burma, Ghana, Malawi, Burundi, Nepal, Zambia, 
Mozambique, Indonesia and Civil Society Department. 

*Other refers to departments which contribute <2% of results, 
and includes Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal, Uganda, Zimbabwe and 
Somalia. 

## Results Achieved By Sector - Climate Change

 
Climate change threatens to undermine progress to reduce global pover ty. Many poor people already suffer the effects of weather variability and indications are that climate change is increasing the frequency and scale of these events, with floods, famine and droughts already taking their toll. The recent repor ts by the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were unequivocal in assessing that climate change is happening and greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activities are the dominant cause. Concer ted international action is required, as unmitigated climate change poses great risks to human health, global food security and economic development. The £3.87 billion International Climate Fund (ICF) is par t of the UK's international effor t to address the challenge of climate change. It suppor ts programmes that help poor people adapt to the impacts of climate change, promote low carbon growth and protect forests in developing countries. These programmes aim to improve the quality of people's lives - par ticularly women and girls'; suppor t people's livelihoods; and underpin long term economic growth and development. From 2011–16 the ICF is split between 3 UK government depar tments: 

 
- Depar 
tment for International Development (DFID) - contributes £2.4 billion 
 
- Depar 
tment of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) - contributes £1.329 billion 
 
- Depar 
tment for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) - contributes £140 million 
The results presented in the DFID Annual Repor t are for DFID programmes only. The majority, but not all, of these programmes are funded under the ICF
. For a summary of overall ICF results please see the ICF results monitoring repor t on the GOV
.UK website. 

## Dfid Commitments

DFID has made a commitment to: 

 
- Help millions of poor people to protect their lives and livelihoods from the effects of climate change - Help millions of poor people secure clean energy - Give more protection to the world's forests and the 1.2 billion people who depend on them 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

There are 3 climate change indicators included in the DFID Results Framework to measure progress towards the climate change commitment: 

 
- Number of people suppor 
ted by DFID programmes to cope with the effects of climate change 
- Number of people with improved access to clean energy as a result of DFID programmes - Number of hectares where deforestation and degradation have been avoided through DFID suppor 
t 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results: 

 
- Supported nearly 3.4 million people to cope with the effects of climate change - Improved access to clean energy for almost 2.4 million people - Avoided approximately 5,000 hectares of deforestation and degradation 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Indicator                          | Indicator type    | Results achieved up to 2013-14 inclusive    |
|------------------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Male                               | Female            | Not identified                              |
| Total                              |                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                         | 709,000           | 738,000                                     |
| 3,396,000                          |                   |                                             |
| Number of people supported by      |                   |                                             |
| DFID funding to cope with the      |                   |                                             |
| effects of climate change          |                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                         | 1,090,000         | 1,060,000                                   |
| 2,393,000                          |                   |                                             |
| Number of people with improved     |                   |                                             |
| access to clean energy as a result |                   |                                             |
| of DFID funding                    |                   |                                             |
| Cumulative                         | N/A               | N/A                                         |
| 5,000                              |                   |                                             |
| Number of hectares where           |                   |                                             |
| deforestation and degradation have |                   |                                             |
| been avoided                       |                   |                                             |

## Results Achieved By Country

The majority of people have been suppor ted to cope with climate change through centrally managed programmes in DFID's Climate and Environment Depar tment (CED) (1.8 million) as well as Nepal (620,000) and Uganda (320,000). Most people with improved access to clean energy have been targeted through programmes in India (1.1 million), Bangladesh (630,000) and Nepal (220,000). Only Nepal has been able to repor t the number of hectares (5,000) where deforestation and degradation have been avoided. This is due to a large number of programmes unable to repor t achieved results for this indicator. 

For fur ther details please refer to the methodology note published on the GOV.UK website.26 

## The Number Of People Supported To Cope With The Effects Of Climate Change

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 
*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, and includes Kenya, Malawi and Africa Regional. 

## The Number Of People With Improved Access To Clean Energy

Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive 
*Other refers to departments which contribute <4% of results, and includes Malawi, Climate and Environment Department, Caribbean and Research and Evidence Division. 

## Results Achieved By Sector - Health

Poor health is both a cause and a consequence of pover ty, and widens inequities. Globally, health is improving. 

Yet the poorest people in both low and middle income countries suffer the most from ill health, and women suffer more than men.27 Progress is being made against the 3 MDGs which relate to health: MDG 4 (reduce child mor tality), MDG 5 
(improve maternal health) and MDG 6 (combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases). Since 1990 the number of children under 5 years of age dying from preventable causes has fallen from around 12 million each year to around 7 million.28 Maternal mor tality and under 5 mor tality have both declined by 47% since 1990. In 2010, 
63% of women aged 15–49 years who were married or in union were using contraception, while 12% wanted to stop or postpone childbearing but were not using contraception. Fifty-five percent of pregnant women received the recommended minimum of 4 antenatal visits for the period 2005–12. The propor tion of bir ths attended by a skilled bir th attendant is above 90% in 3 of the 6 World Health Organization (WHO) regions, but remains below 
50% in the WHO African Region (WHO factsheets 290 and 348). To translate this into lives saved, continued attention to skilled bir th attendance is needed, including ensuring health workers are appropriately trained and have access to the right drugs and equipment. There have been reductions in illness and death due to malaria in the worst-affected countries. Between 2000 and 2012, estimated malaria mor tality rates fell by 42% in all age groups and by 48% in children aged under 
5 years. The estimated incidence of malaria per 1,000 persons at risk (which takes into account population growth over time) shows a reduction of 25% globally, and 31% in the African Region, between 2000 and 2012.29 

## Dfid Commitments

By March 2015, DFID is committed to: 

 
- Saving the lives of 50,000 women in pregnancy and childbir 
th 
- Saving the lives of 250,000 thousand newborn babies - Helping halve the number of deaths from malaria in at least 10 high burden countries - Suppor 
ting 2 million bir 
ths with skilled bir 
th attendants 
 
- Enabling an additional 10 million couples to access modern methods of family planning, including 1 million 
young women aged 15-19 years 
 
- Helping immunise more than 55 million children against preventable diseases 
These commitments were made at the MDG summit in 2010 and included in DFID's 2011 'UK aid: Changing lives, delivering results'30 publication. 

## Indicators Used To Measure Progress

The following indicators are included in the DFID Results Framework to measure progress towards the health commitments: 

 
- Number of maternal lives saved through DFID suppor 
t (modelled) 
 
- Number of newborn lives saved through DFID suppor 
t (modelled) 
- Malaria attributable deaths (modelled) 
- Number of insecticide treated bed-nets distributed with DFID suppor 
t 
 
- Number of bir 
ths delivered with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors through DFID suppor 
t 
 
- Number of additional women using modern methods of family planning through DFID suppor 
t 
 
- Number of children immunised against preventable disease through suppor 
t to GAVI 

## Results Achieved

By 2013–14, DFID had achieved the following results: 

 
- 36,000 maternal lives saved - 64,000 newborn lives saved - Contribution to a reduction in malaria mortality from 29 malaria attributable deaths per 100,000 at risk worldwide 
in 2009 to 24 malaria attributable deaths per 100,000 at risk worldwide in 2012 (a 17% reduction). The bulk of these deaths occurred in Africa. In Africa there were an estimated 83 malaria attributable deaths per 100,000 at risk in 2012, down from 103 in 2009 (a 20% reduction)31 
- 33.7 million long-lasting insecticide-treated bednets distributed - 3.6 million births attended by a skilled birth attendant - 5.0 million additional women using modern methods of family planning - 40.7 million children immunised against preventable diseases 
The lives saved indicators are obtained by modelling the impact of health-related programmes (reproductive, maternal and newborn health; HIV; malaria; case management of illness; nutrition; vaccination; and humanitarian assistance), as well as general and health sector budget suppor t, using a software application called the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).32 Malaria programmes operate bilaterally, regionally, multilaterally and through civil society organisations. The multilateral malaria contribution is mainly delivered through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The regional programme 'Strengthening the use of data for malaria decision making in Africa' covers 22 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. 18 DFID focus countries are implementing programmes that contribute to DFID's malaria results. The civil society component includes the Malaria Consor tium. Malaria results are also being delivered through suppor t to malaria focused research and product development, and UNITAID. 

Programmes for skilled bir th attendance are mainly bilateral, operating in 19 DFID focus countries. A civil society component is delivered through Save the Children. Family planning programmes operate bilaterally, regionally, multilaterally and through civil society organisations. Bilateral family planning programmes operate in 16 DFID focus countries, accounting for half the results. The regional programme Prevention of Maternal Deaths from Unwanted Pregnancy (PMDUP) covers 14 countries in Africa and Asia. The multilateral family planning contribution is delivered through UNFPA's global programme to enhance reproductive health commodity security (GPRHCS). The civil society component is delivered through Marie Stopes International (MSI) and International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). Immunisation programmes are delivered multilaterally by GAVI, to whom DFID provides a core contribution each year. 

## Progress Towards Dfid Results Commitments

| Results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive      | Indicator    | Indicator    |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| type                                          |              |              |
| Total                                         |              |              |
| Male                                          | Female       | Not          |
| identified                                    |              |              |
| Modelled                                      | N/A          | 36,000       |
| 36,000                                        |              |              |
| Number of maternal lives saved through DFID   |              |              |
| support                                       |              |              |
| Modelled                                      | 0            | 0            |
| 64,000                                        |              |              |
| Number of neo-natal lives saved through DFID  |              |              |
| support                                       |              |              |
| Number of malaria-specific deaths per         |              |              |
| 100,000 persons per year                      |              |              |
| Modelled                                      | 0            | 0            |
| 24                                            |              |              |
| Number of insecticide treated bed-nets        |              |              |
| distributed with DFID support                 |              |              |
| Cumulative                                    | 0            | 0            |
| 33,689,000                                    |              |              |
| Cumulative                                    | 0            | 0            |
| 3,582,000                                     |              |              |
| Number of births delivered with the help of   |              |              |
| nurses, midwives or doctors through DFID      |              |              |
| support                                       |              |              |
| Cumulative                                    | N/A          | 4,966,000    |
| 4,966,000                                     |              |              |
| Number of additional women using modern       |              |              |
| methods of family planning through DFID       |              |              |
| support*                                      |              |              |
| Number of children immunised against          |              |              |
| preventable disease through support to GAVI** |              |              |
| Cumulative                                    | 0            | 0            |
| 40,660,000                                    |              |              |

* Results achieved through both multilateral and bilateral channels. The approach to measuring the multilateral contribution towards family planning has been changed this year from one based on couple years of protection (CYP) to a more robust methodology based on a country by year analysis of contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR). This has resulted in reduced estimates of additional family planning users in each year. Overall results for 2013–14 are fur ther lowered due to 2013 outputs from GPRHCS not yet having been repor ted. 

** Results achieved through multilateral channels only. 

## Results Achieved By Country

The summaries below cover total results achieved up to 2013–14 inclusive. Due to limited space, the pie char ts can be accessed on the GOV
.UK website. 

For malaria, the highest numbers of long-lasting insecticide treated bed-nets that have been procured and distributed using DFID country bilateral suppor t are in Kenya (6.5 million), Ghana (5.5 million), the Democratic Republic of Congo (4.6 million), Nigeria (4.5 million) and Tanzania (2.8 million). The highest number of maternal lives saved has been in Ethiopia (5,000), Bangladesh (4,000), India (2,000), Pakistan (2,000) and Malawi (1,000). 

The highest number of newborn lives saved has been in India (20,000), Bangladesh (12,000), Pakistan (9,000), Ethiopia (6,000) and Nigeria (5,000). The highest numbers of bir ths attended by a skilled bir th attendant have been achieved in Pakistan (700,000), India (690,000), Nigeria (430,000), Ethiopia (420,000) and the Democratic Republic of Congo (340,000). For family planning, the highest numbers of additional users have been reached through programmes in Bangladesh (890,000), Uganda (610,000), India (400,000), Kenya (360,000) and Malawi (260,000). 

## Results Achieved By Multilateral Organisations

The following results are delivered by multilateral organisations, and fall broadly within the health sector. These indicators were included in the multilateral section of DFID's Results Framework. The results presented here are based on all funding that the multilateral receives, not just funding from DFID or the UK. These results are presented alongside DFID's share of core funding to the multilateral organisations, in order to illustrate that DFID contributes a share of those results. 

| Indicator                                          | Multilateral        |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| Reporting                                          |                     |
| period                                             |                     |
| Latest result                                      | DFID's contribution |
| as a % of total core                               |                     |
| funding                                            |                     |
| Number of children immunised against preventable   |                     |
| disease                                            |                     |
| GAVI                                               | 2013                |
| Number of HIV positive women provided with         |                     |
| treatment to prevent transmission to their babies  |                     |
| GFATM                                              | 2013                |
| Number of insecticide treated bed nets distributed | GFATM               |
| Number of people provided with treatment for AIDS  | GFATM               |
| Number of tuberculosis cases detected and treated  | GFATM               |
| Number of children immunised                       | IDA FY 2012–13      |
| People provided with a basic package of health,    |                     |
| nutrition or population services                   |                     |
| IDA FY 2012–13                                     | 34,800,000          |
| Number of female condoms procured                  | UNFPA               |
| Number of vitamin A treatments procured            | UNICEF              |
| Children benefiting from child-friendly HIV/AIDS   |                     |
| medicines                                          |                     |
| UNITAID                                            | 2012                |
| Children supplied with TB treatments               | UNITAID             |

## Figure 2.5: Technical Notes Some Important Points To Note In Relation To The Level 2 Results Data Data Sources

 
- The information on results is collected from DFID country offices, central DFID depar 
tments and 
multilateral institutions. The data is collected from a variety of sources, such as representative sample sur 
veys of households, management information systems held by our par 
tner country 
governments and individual project data generated from routine project monitoring by our par 
tners. 

## Reporting

 
- Total results achieved since baseline up to 2013–14 are presented. Baselines were set in March 
2011 and may vary across country and indicator reflecting the latest data available at the time. The results are disaggregated by sex where relevant, subject to data availability. 
 
- The results estimates are either cumulative indicators or peak year indicators: 
 
- Cumulative indicators take the sum of the results achieved across the various years to 
measure performance. 
 
- Peak year indicators aggregate results for each programme in the par 
ticular year for which 
the programme achieved the greatest results. This ensures we measure the number of unique individuals reached and avoids any double counting. 
 
- DFID results estimates have been rounded to the nearest thousand. Multilateral results are 
rounded to the nearest thousand except in cases where the multilateral institution uses a different rounding practice. 

## Timeliness

 
- The results presented in the 2013–14 Annual Repor 
t represent the latest data available, and 
generally represent results as at end March 2014 (unless otherwise specified). 
 
- Results for 2013–14 for some programmes have not been included, as they were not available at 
the time of publication. This means that in some cases results up to 2013–14 are underestimated. Also, for some indicators data is sourced from household sur 
veys which are 
only carried out every few years. 
 
- Updated estimates will be published in next year's Annual Repor 
t to take account of fur 
ther 
information for 2013–14 and earlier years that was not available at end March 2014. 

## Accuracy

 
- Given the range of data sources used, the accuracy of the results data varies and is subject to 
the quality of the underlying data source. In many cases DFID uses data collected by others (eg par 
tner country governments, international organisations) and therefore DFID has limited control 
over the quality of the data. 
 
- Statistics Advisers in DFID under 
take quality assurance of the results data and attempt to 
minimise the source of any errors although there is a risk that errors may still exist. The types of errors which DFID attempts to minimise include: 
 
- Double counting - identifying unique beneficiaries and avoiding duplication in repor 
ting 
between programmes. 
 
- Attribution - measuring the results which can be associated with DFID inter 
ventions/funding. 
 
- Coverage: to ensure the results are representative there is sometimes a need to overcome 
challenges in collecting data such as security challenges. This can sometimes jeopardise the completeness and the accuracy of the results estimates. 
 

## Coherence And Comparability

 
- DFID has developed and published methodological guidance on each indicator to help ensure 
consistency of measurement across countries and permit meaningful aggregation of results. 
 
- Where possible, indicators use internationally agreed definitions as outlined in the methodology 
notes. 

## Further Information

 
- For information on the methodology for measuring the results indicators, details of the data 
sources used and information on the quality of the estimates, please visit the indicator methodology notes on the GOV
.UK website at www.gov
.uk/government/publications/indicator­
methodology-notes 
 
- For a breakdown of results by sector, country, sex, over time, please visit the Annual Repor 
t 
datasets: www.gov
.uk/government/publications/dfid-annual-repor 
t-and-accounts-2013–14­
datasets 

| Abbreviation                                          | Full name                                           | Source    |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| AfDB                                                  |                                                     |           |
| African Development Bank                              | AfDB Annual Repor                                   | t 2012    |
| AsDB                                                  |                                                     |           |
| Asian Development Bank                                | AsDB internal database                              |           |
| CDB                                                   |                                                     |           |
| Caribbean Development Bank                            | Caribbean Development Bank: Development             |           |
| Effectiveness Review 2013                             |                                                     |           |
| ECHO                                                  |                                                     |           |
| European Union budget and Humanitarian Aid and Civil  |                                                     |           |
| Protection department of the European Commission      |                                                     |           |
| GAVI                                                  |                                                     |           |
| Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation         | GAVI Alliance mission and strategic goal indicators |           |
| GFATM                                                 |                                                     |           |
| Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria   | 2013 Global Fund programmatic results               |           |
| GPE                                                   |                                                     |           |
| Global Partnership for Education                      | GPE Results for Learning Report 2013                |           |
| IADB                                                  |                                                     |           |
| Inter-American Development Bank                       | IADB Development Effectiveness Report 2013          |           |
| ICRC                                                  |                                                     |           |
| International Committee of the Red Cross              | ICRC Annual Report 2013                             |           |
| IDA                                                   |                                                     |           |
| International Development Assistance                  | The World Bank Corporate Scorecard                  |           |
| IFAD                                                  |                                                     |           |
| International Fund for Agricultural Development       | 2013 Report on IFAD's Development Effectiveness     |           |
| (RIDE)                                                |                                                     |           |
| IFC                                                   |                                                     |           |
| International Finance Corporation                     | IFC Annual Report 2013                              |           |
| IOM                                                   |                                                     |           |
| International Organization for Migration              | IOM Annual Report 2013                              |           |
| PIDG                                                  |                                                     |           |
| Private Infrastructure Development Group              | Results from internal post-completion monitoring    |           |
| database                                              |                                                     |           |
| UNESCO                                                |                                                     |           |
| United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural   |                                                     |           |
| Organization                                          |                                                     |           |
| UNFPA                                                 |                                                     |           |
| United Nations Population Fund                        | UNFPA (internal) donor support database             |           |
| UNHCR                                                 |                                                     |           |
| United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees         | UNHCR Global Report 2013                            |           |
| UNICEF                                                |                                                     |           |
| United Nations Children's Fund                        | Annual Report of the Executive Director 2014        |           |
| UNITAID                                               |                                                     |           |
| United Nations International Drug Purchasing Facility | UNITAID key performance indicators 2012             |           |
| WFP                                                   |                                                     |           |
| World Food Programme                                  | Annual Performance Report for 2012                  |           |
ECHO internal database 
UNESCO internal database 

## Level 3: Measuring Dfid'S Operational Effectiveness

2.13  Level 3 of the DFID Results Framework monitors how well the Depar 
tment manages itself to deliver 
results and ensure value for money. DFID monitors closely the following performance areas: 
 
- Pipeline delivery - data on DFID's pipeline of programmes (either approved or under design) to 
help assess whether DFID has sufficient good quality plans in place to ensure that it will achieve its results commitments and spend its budget effectively. 
 
- Por 
tfolio quality - a measure of the extent to which DFID's inter 
ventions are on track to deliver their 
expected outputs and outcomes. 
 
- Monitoring and evaluation - data on the extent to which DFID is actively reviewing its programmes 
and learning lessons for the future. 
 
- Structural Reform Plan - data to assess how well DFID is delivering against its corporate objectives 
and areas prioritised by the UK coalition government. 

## Pipeline Of Programmes Approved Or Under Design

2.14  DFID regularly monitors its pipeline of projects at both approved and design stages to ensure it has 
sufficient plans in place that represent value for money. This was of par 
ticular impor 
tance over the 
last few years as DFID built a strong pipeline of programmes to deliver the increase in its budget from 2013–14. 
2.15  Going forward, as DFID's budget levels off, sustaining a strong pipeline of projects will drive choice 
and competition, ensuring that the best value programmes are implemented. 
2.16  Figure 2.7 shows that DFID is in a strong position with programmes of over £8 billion already 
approved for 2014–15 and almost £3 billion more programmes in the pipeline. Similarly for 2015–16 over £5 billion programmes are approved and nearly £7 billion of programmes are being developed. 

## Portfolio Quality

2.17  DFID takes its responsibility to drive efficiency and effectiveness in its programmes very seriously. 
Every DFID project or programme is underpinned by a business case (approved by ministers if the value is over £5 million). Performance of every programme, irrespective of value, is reviewed in each year of its life to assess whether they are on track to deliver the benefits at the costs expected in the 
business case. Programmes that fail to deliver expected results and fail to improve will be closed. 
 
2.18  During 2013–14, over 1,100 projects were reviewed, an increase of 40% on the previous year. Those 
projects scoring A and above represent over 80% of the value and volume of projects scored. This means that over 80% of the por 
tfolio is achieving or exceeding its objectives. The propor 
tion of 
projects scoring A and above has been relatively stable throughout the year, and these programmes are on average higher in value than those projects scoring lower grades. 
2.19  DFID's Por 
tfolio Quality Index provides a weighted measure of how well the por 
tfolio of projects is 
performing based on reviews performed in the previous 12 months, with a range from 50 to 150. At the end of March 2014 the Por 
tfolio Quality Index was 98.1 and remained in the range 97.7 to 99.1 
throughout the year. 

## Monitoring And Evaluation

2.20  In 2013–14 the Secretary of State introduced new programme management controls. There has been 
a successful effor 
t to reduce the volume and value of overdue reviews in the second half of the year, 
shown in Figure 2.9 below. 
2.21  At 31 March 2014 there were 13 annual reviews and one project completion review overdue, 
compared with 63 annual reviews and 22 project completion reviews at the same time last year. All reviews overdue were less than one month beyond the deadline. Ten of the annual reviews and the project completion review were completed during the first week in April, with 2 of the remaining 3 completed later in April. 
2.22  During 2013–14, 30 evaluations were completed, of which 13 have been published on the DFID 
section of the GOV
.UK website. The remaining evaluations are either going through the quality 
assurance process or are joint evaluations managed by other donors which will be published in tandem with par 
tners. 

## Performance Against Dfid'S Structural Reform Plan

2.23  DFID's structural reform priorities are set out in the Structural Reform Plan in the DFID Business Plan 
as published in May 2013. The Business Plan (available at http://transparency.number10.gov
.uk) 
outlines the Coalition Government's vision up to 2015, including future reform priorities. It also includes information on results, expenditure and efficiency and transparency measures. 
2.24  During 2013–14, DFID performed very strongly in implementing its structural reform priorities. As 
shown in Table 2.1, 27 actions were completed, 22 of these on time and 5 in advance of deadline. 

| Structural Reform                                                      | No. of actions    | No. of actions    | Details of actions completed    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------|
| Plan priorities                                                        | completed         | continuing        |                                 |
| into 2014–15                                                           | (2013–2015)       | during            |                                 |
| 2013–14                                                                |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| 1. Boost economic                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| 4                                                                      |                   | 10                |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| introduced new web-based tools so people in the developing world       |                   |                   |                                 |
| development                                                            |                   |                   |                                 |
| better understand how trade policy affects them                        |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| worked with Cabinet Office to deliver a UK G8 Presidency event to      |                   |                   |                                 |
| increase international awareness of the social impact investment       |                   |                   |                                 |
| market                                                                 |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        | -                 |                   |                                 |
| established a range of novel public-private partnerships able to       |                   |                   |                                 |
| reach 4 million farmers in India                                       |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| worked closely with other government departments to develop            |                   |                   |                                 |
| mechanisms by which UK science can have a greater impact on            |                   |                   |                                 |
| international development objectives                                   |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| 2. Honour                                                              |                   |                   |                                 |
| 4                                                                      | 9                 |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| ensured the MDG Countdown event 2013 effectively drew                  |                   |                   |                                 |
| international                                                          |                   |                   |                                 |
| international attention to MDG successes and lessons learned and       |                   |                   |                                 |
| commitments                                                            |                   |                   |                                 |
| secured commitment to gender goals                                     |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| expanded access to schooling and educational outcomes for poor         |                   |                   |                                 |
| children in at least 4 countries                                       |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| jointly led the Global Partnership for Effective Development           |                   |                   |                                 |
| Co-operation which accelerated action on domestic resource             |                   |                   |                                 |
| mobilisation, transparency, knowledge sharing and the private          |                   |                   |                                 |
| sector's contribution to development                                   |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| worked effectively across Whitehall and with G8 par                    | tners to ensure   |                   |                                 |
| the UK's G8 Presidency reached ambitious but achievable                |                   |                   |                                 |
| developmental commitments                                              |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| 5                                                                      |                   | 11                |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| supported a greater number of DFID partner countries to join the       |                   |                   |                                 |
| Open Government Partnership during the UK co-chair tenure              |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| 3. Drive                                                               |                   |                   |                                 |
| transparency, value                                                    |                   |                   |                                 |
| for money and open                                                     |                   |                   |                                 |
| government                                                             |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| ensured all governance advisers and key finance posts were             |                   |                   |                                 |
| certified to the level required on the anti-corruption and counter-    |                   |                   |                                 |
| fraud accreditation framework                                          |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| conducted a follow-up report to the Multilateral Aid Review            |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| piloted traceability of DFID aid under the Aid Transparency            |                   |                   |                                 |
| Challenge and proposed roll out plan                                   |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| introduced new ways to allow poor people to directly monitor and       |                   |                   |                                 |
| comment on aid projects as part of the Global Poverty Action Fund      |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| 4. Strengthen                                                          |                   |                   |                                 |
| 3                                                                      | 7                 |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| implemented new security and justice programmes in 12 fragile and      |                   |                   |                                 |
| governance and                                                         |                   |                   |                                 |
| conflict-affected states                                               |                   |                   |                                 |
| security in fragile                                                    |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| supported the political transition process in Yemen following the Gulf |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| and conflict-affected                                                  |                   |                   |                                 |
| Cooperation Council Initiative                                         |                   |                   |                                 |
|                                                                        |                   |                   |                                 |
| countries and make                                                     |                   |                   |                                 |
| humanitarian                                                           |                   |                   |                                 |
| -                                                                      |                   |                   |                                 |
| supported the Federal Government of Somalia to develop and             |                   |                   |                                 |
| response more                                                          |                   |                   |                                 |
| deliver their priorities: robust public financial management, building |                   |                   |                                 |
| effective                                                              |                   |                   |                                 |
| political stability and improved security and justice                  |                   |                   |                                 |
| Details of actions completed                                         | Structural Reform    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Plan priorities                                                      |                      |
| (2013–2015)                                                          |                      |
| No. of actions                                                       |                      |
| continuing                                                           |                      |
| into 2014–15                                                         |                      |
| No. of actions                                                       |                      |
| completed                                                            |                      |
| during                                                               |                      |
| 2013–14                                                              |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| 6                                                                    | 3                    |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| worked in partnership with the Nike Foundation to bring private      |                      |
| sector expertise into DFID's strategy on gender equality, and        |                      |
| stimulated innovative approaches to empowering adolescent girls      |                      |
| 5. Lead international                                                |                      |
| action to improve the                                                |                      |
| lives of girls and                                                   |                      |
| women                                                                |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| assessed the progress of international organisations on delivering   |                      |
| for girls and women where this was identified as a reform priority   |                      |
| following the Multilateral Aid Review                                |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| ensured Risk Assessments for Violence against Women and Girls are    |                      |
| undertaken in all UK funded humanitarian suppor                      | t                    |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| conducted a mid-term review of the Reproductive, Maternal and        |                      |
| Neonatal Health Framework for Results including progress against     |                      |
| results and its commitments to save women and children's lives       |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| designed a programme to contribute to helping 120 million additional |                      |
| women access family planning                                         |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| established a programme to reduce the practice of female genital     |                      |
| mutilation/cutting by 30% in 10 countries over 5 years               |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| 6. Combat climate                                                    |                      |
| change                                                               |                      |
| 5                                                                    | 3                    |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| supported the future design of the Green Climate Fund to have a      |                      |
| clear focus on innovation, effectiveness and results                 |                      |
|                                                                      | -                    |
| enhanced developing countries' access to private finance by          |                      |
| attracting new private sector investors or sovereign wealth funds to |                      |
| the climate public-private partnership programme                     |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| implemented programmes in 6 countries to help at least 1 million     |                      |
| people cope with the effects of climate change                       |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| supported climate technology innovation centres in 2 countries       |                      |
|                                                                      |                      |
| -                                                                    |                      |
| ensured that climate change risks and opportunities were identified  |                      |
| and addressed across DFID's programmes through the                   |                      |
| implementation of Strategic Programme Reviews                        |                      |

## Level 4: Measuring Organisational Efficiency In Dfid

2.25  In advance of 2013–14, DFID put in place resources and processes to manage effective delivery of 
the UK's commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI as ODA in 2013 while reducing its administration costs (excluding depreciation) from £131 million in 2010–11 to £102 million in 2013–14. 
2.26  During 2013–14, DFID under 
took an end-to-end review of its programme management cycle. A 
package of reforms was agreed to improve programme leadership, capability and processes. These were designed to fur 
ther strengthen its reputation for world class delivery of results and use of 
evidence; ensure it remains well equipped to address the underlying causes of pover 
ty and conflict; 
and enable its staff to build the skills and capabilities which will increasingly be required across the Civil Service. The reforms, including the strengthening of accountability and roles and responsibilities, streamlining processes and accrediting a professional programme management cadre under a new Head of Profession, are all on track to be delivered in 2014–15. This will build on the work to professionalise programme management, which has seen 700 staff receive training. 
2.27  As par 
t of the Civil Service Reform agenda, DFID has put in place an Operational Excellence 
programme to drive improvement in DFID's business operating model, developing a leaner, more customer-focused approach to business. This programme includes: the modernisation of DFID's finance operating model; the restructuring of DFID's Human Resources operating model; and implementation of DFID's digital strategy. 
2.28  DFID has modernised its finance operating model to strengthen the par 
tnership between core 
finance and the rest of the organisation and embed financial management throughout the corporate, geographic, policy and global divisions. Finance business par 
tners have been introduced for each 
Director General area along with finance managers and financial analysts within individual depar 
tments. In addition financial transaction processing has been centralised. 
 


2.29  In October 2013, DFID introduced a new Human Resources and Payroll system (HR Passpor 
t) which 
delivers an improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of people management across DFID. The introduction of improved self-service, simpler standardised processes and better access to accurate management information reduces some of the HR transactional work carried out across DFID. This contributes to a more efficient and cost-effective delivery of corporate ser 
vices and anticipates 
savings of around £1 million per annum from 2014–15. 
2.30  DFID published its Digital Strategy in December 2012 which set out the approach to using digital 
across the organisation. This includes 3 priorities: how technology can suppor 
t better delivery of 
programmes; can make DFID a better organisation to do business with (streamlining systems and business processes); and can suppor 
t DFID to be more open and engaging, including how digital 
channels can suppor 
t gathering feedback which in turn suppor 
ts better decision making. During 
2013–14 the development tracker (which publishes data on how DFID and other government depar 
tments invest in developing countries) was launched and social media was used to engage 
with stakeholders and the public on major events such as the Syria crisis and Typhoon Haiyan. A digital advisory panel has been established to provide advice and challenge to DFID on its Digital Strategy. A skills audit was under 
taken to provide evidence as to current levels of knowledge and 
experience, and the results of this are informing the development of a programme of work to improve digital capability. 
2.31  DFID's Commercial Strategy is driving better value for money through effective and efficient open 
procurement procedures, increasing commercial capability and better contract management. During 2013–14 DFID's commercial adviser network has been developed. Eleven advisers are now embedded within operational depar 
tments and offices, responsible for devising, developing and 
implementing tailored commercial strategies, improving commercial decisions and appraisals in project design, and embedding robust supplier contract and performance management. All senior civil ser 
vants are undergoing a mandatory commercial leadership course. DFID has also made 
strong progress in monitoring a range of contracts through its Key Supplier Management (KSM) programme, which involves Contract Performance Reviews and senior level reviews twice a year across DFID's 11 'key' (strategic) suppliers. DFID's inaugural supplier conference was held in July 2013. Over 30 of DFID's key suppliers, including private sector companies, NGOs and SMEs, attended the conference alongside senior DFID representatives for a series of presentations and workshops focusing on the theme Supplying Value. The next conference will be held in July 2014. DFID's Commercial Strategy has delivered savings of £111 million in 2013–14 against a target of £100 million. 
2.32  DFID, along with other government depar 
tments including the Foreign and Commonwealth Office 
(FCO), British Council and Home Office, has a significant presence overseas. One HMG is a programme of work to streamline the way the UK government operates through the numerous overseas locations in which it is represented. The programme aims to identify the best ways of working and to implement these across other UK government depar 
tments, removing barriers to 
better delivery. DFID's work to date has focused on collaboration (to build a stronger single, crossgovernment team at each overseas post behind an overall FCO lead), co-location (now almost complete), regionalisation, consolidation (establishing a single provider of corporate ser 
vices at each 
overseas post) and harmonisation (aligning pay, terms and conditions for both locally employed staff in country and UK-based staff serving overseas across government depar 
tments, with DFID working 
closely with FCO). 

## One Year On From Whitehall Relocation

One year on from the relocation of DFID's London office, the approach to space utilisation and use of modern technology has enabled the implementation of a more effective office, with administration running costs reducing by around £7 million per annum between the old and new offices.  

## Business Plan Indicators

2.33  A summary of DFID 2013–14 spend by budget type, type of internal operation and type of 
transaction is shown in Table 2.2 below. This is published quar 
terly for all government depar 
tments in 
a consistent format at www.gist.cabinetoffice.gov
.uk/. 
2.34  A subset of the level 2 results indicators is repor 
ted as par 
t of DFID's Business Plan (impact 
indicators) along with information relating to the costs of these results (input indicators). Data for 2013–14, alongside data for the previous year, is shown in Table 2.3. 

2013–14 spending
(A) Spend By budget type 
(A3) Other expenditure outside DEL and AME 
£0.00m 
(A1 + A2 + A3) Total spend 
£10,089.27m 
(B) Spend by type of internal operation 
(B1) Cost of running the estate, sub-total 
(B2) Cost of running IT
, sub-total 
(B3) Cost of corporate services, sub-total 
(B4) Policy and policy implementation, sub-total 
(B1 + B2 + B3 + B4 + B5) Total spend 
(C ) Spend by type of transaction 
(C1) Procurement costs, sub-total 
£1,018.35m 
(C2) People costs, sub-total 
£123.35m 
(C3) Grants, sub-total 
£7,952.20m 
(C1 + C2 + C3 + C4) Total spend 
£10,089.27m 

Note: Excludes depreciation. 

 

 

|                     | Actual £m   |
|---------------------|-------------|
| Total spend         | £10,089.27m |
| (A1) DEL, sub-total | £10,020.27m |
| (A2) AME, sub-total | £68.99m     |
| £11.08m             |             |
| £8.85m              |             |
| £13.93m             |             |
| £9,864.76           |             |
| (B5) Other costs    | £190.66     |
| £10,089.27m         |             |
| (C4) Other costs    | £995.36m    |
|                                                                                         | Input indicators[1]                         | 2012–13        | 2013–14    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|
| Cost per child suppor                                                                   | ted in primary education                    | $110           | $95        |
| Average unit price of long-lasting insecticide treated bed-nets procured[2]             | $3.66                                       | $3.14          |            |
| Cost per person of providing sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility      | £17                                         | £10            |            |
| Cost per person of improving access to financial services[3]                            | Not available                               | Not available  |            |
| DFID spend on elections - through DFID's bilateral programme[4]                         | £29 million                                 | £39 million    |            |
| DFID spend on elections - DFID's Imputed Multilateral Share[5]                          | £15 million                                 | £7 million     |            |
| Cost per birth delivered by a skilled birth attendant[6]                                | £221                                        | £261           |            |
| Spend on climate change adaptation, low carbon development and protecting forests       |                                             |                |            |
| - through DFID's bilateral programme                                                    |                                             |                |            |
| Spend on climate change adaptation, low carbon development and protecting forests       |                                             |                |            |
| - through DFID's multilateral programme                                                 |                                             |                |            |
| DFID spend through multilateral organisations                                           | £3,252 million                              | £4,423 million |            |
| Impact indicators                                                                       | 2012–13                                     | 2013–14        |            |
| Number of children supported by DFID in primary education[7]                            | 8.7 million                                 |                |            |
| Number of insecticide treated bed-nets distributed with DFID support - through          |                                             |                |            |
| DFID's bilateral programme[8]                                                           |                                             |                |            |
| Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility as a result |                                             |                |            |
| of DFID programmes                                                                      |                                             |                |            |
| Number of people with access to financial services as a result of DFID suppor           | t -                                         |                |            |
| through DFID's bilateral programme                                                      |                                             |                |            |
| Number of people with access to financial services as a result of DFID suppor           | t -                                         |                |            |
| through DFID's multilateral programme (IFAD)[9]                                         |                                             |                |            |
| Number of people who vote in elections supported by DFID                                | 26.0 million                                | 60.6 million   |            |
| Number of births delivered with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors through DFID    |                                             |                |            |
| funding                                                                                 |                                             |                |            |
| Number of people DFID supports to cope with the impacts of climate change               | 0.2 million                                 | 2.9 million    |            |
| Other datasets                                                                          | 2012–13                                     | 2013–14        |            |
| UK ODA as a percentage of GNI                                                           | 0.56                                        | 0.72           |            |
| % share of global ODA of donors who are publishing their aid information in an IATI     |                                             |                |            |
| compliant format                                                                        |                                             |                |            |
| Number of volunteers par                                                                | ticipating in International Citizen Service | 1,010          | 2,146      |
| Structural Reform Plan actions                                                          | 2012–13                                     | 2013–14        |            |
| Total number of actions completed during the year                                       | 22                                          | 27             |            |
| Total number of actions overdue at the end of the year                                  | 0                                           | 0              |            |
| Number of actions overdue that are attributable to external factors                     | 0                                           | 0              |            |
| Total number of actions ongoing                                                         | 42                                          | 43             |            |

## Notes

[1] The input indicators provide information on the cost effectiveness of DFID's programmes by linking spend to performance. It should 
be noted that many of the inputs measured are not true unit cost indicators. Instead they show aggregate spend on sectors related to the results. Other results, which are not captured in the impact indicators, are also being delivered through this spending. 
[2] Data was also provided by UNICEF
, the US President's Malaria Initiative, the subset of Global Fund procurements realised through 
the Voluntary Pooled Procurement mechanism and direct DFID procurement for the calendar year 2013. The average unit price was between $2.97 and 3.10 for 190x180x150 net and $3.06 and 3.16 for all nets. The average unit price for DFID procured nets was £2.23. DFID, GFATM and USPMI reported ex-works (EXW) prices and UNICEF a free carrier (FCA) price. The price of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) varies significantly depending on a number of market factors, such as availability, capacity and timing of demand, in addition to product factors including size, shape, colour and denier, and logistical factors such as INCOTERMS. 
[3] It is not currently possible to derive accurate data on direct cost incurred in supporting access to financial services by individuals, 
given financial access for individuals is often a part of wider financial sector development programmes. 
[4] Data relates to spend reported against CRS code 15151 (Elections). [5] Data relates to spend reported against CRS code 15151 (Elections) and is repor 
ted with a one year time lag relating to calendar year 
ODA expenditure (ie the figure under the 2013–14 column relates to 2012, and the figure under 2012–13 relates to 2011 ODA spend). 
[6] There is no specific target for this indicator. Improvements in quality and increased efforts to reach the poorest and most vulnerable 
can lead to increases in unit costs. 
[7] The figure of 8.7 million represents the total number of children supported in primary education up to 2013–14 inclusive, so 
includes results achieved in earlier years. It is not appropriate to present data for individual years for this indicator as the data is drawn from national systems and governments' enrolment data may be subject to a time lag of a year or more. 
[8] Results achieved through DFID's bilateral programme only. Multilateral information associated with DFID's unique efforts is not 
currently available. 
[9] Latest results = calendar year 2012; 2013 results not yet available. The figures are reported with a time lag as there is a delay in 
these being available from the multilateral organisations. 

| £281 million    | £321 million    |
|-----------------|-----------------|
| £31 million     | £34 million     |
| 11.2 million    | 9.1 million     |
| 5.0 million     | 5.5 million     |
| 19.6 million    | 26.7 million    |
| 0.1 million     | Not available   |
| 1.0 million     | 0.7 million     |
| 75%             | 83%             |


## Results In Dfid Priority Countries And Regions

3.1  
This chapter focuses on DFID's work in suppor 
ting sustainable pover 
ty reduction through 
development programmes in DFID's 28 priority countries and DFID's associated regional programmes - Africa, Asia, and the Middle East and Nor 
th Africa. It also covers DFID's work in the 
Overseas Territories. 
3.2  
DFID's priority countries are: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Occupied Palestinian Territories, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Uganda, Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe. 
3.3  
The country and regional pages within this chapter summarise key priorities, contributions and results (as set out in country and regional Operational Plans), as well as spend by sector. 
3.4  
In addition, each country page documents the effectiveness of DFID's bilateral programmes in contributing towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). As in previous repor 
ts, one 
indicator per MDG is used to illustrate a country's progress.1 
3.5  
Progress towards the MDGs is monitored annually through the collaborative effor 
ts of agencies and 
organisations within the United Nations (UN) and international statistical systems. Data at a global and regional level is published annually. Based on the same international data and in conjunction with Oxford Policy Management, DFID developed its own assessment methodology several years ago to monitor progress towards the MDGs at country level. 
3.6  
Throughout this chapter the following colour coding is used to illustrate country progress against the specific MDG indicators:2,3 

Green 
Countries have either 'achieved' their target or are 'on track' to achieve their target. They have a rate of progress that, if continued, will mean that they will reach the target by 2015. 
Amber 
 
Countries have made progress, but too slowly to reach the target by 2015. Continuing at the same rate, they will reach the goal by 2040. These countries are rated 'off track'. 
Red 
Countries have made very slow progress, no progress at all, or have regressed. These countries are rated 'severely off track'. Countries have insufficient data to be able to monitor progress. 
Grey 

3.7  
MDG data was taken from the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD) website for the MDGs. DFID consulted its country offices on the appropriateness of the UNSD data. Where countries felt that other data sources, such as health, demographic or household sur 
veys, had more recent data, longer time 
series or more accurately reflected the position of the country, this data has been used instead. As such, some of the data used here may differ from UNSD data. 
3.8  
Key country statistics are also presented, using the following sources: 
 
- Population: UN prospect4 (2010) unless otherwise quoted 
 
- % population living on less than $1.25/day: World Bank5 (year quoted) 
 
- Total fer 
tility rate: UN prospect6 (2005–10) 
 
- Annual Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate: World Bank7 (2012 unless otherwise quoted). 
3.9  
In a small number of cases, alternative data sources have been used if they provide more recent data or more accurately reflect the position of the country. Details of the sources are referenced on the respective country pages with the year the data relates to included in the brackets. 
3.10  Please note the key statistic on the '% living below less than $1.25 a day' is based on 2005 
international prices using purchasing power parities (PPPs) to conver 
t the nominal value of pover 
ty 
lines measured in local currencies to USD for international comparisons. These were the latest estimates published by the World Bank at the time of preparing DFID's Annual Repor 
t, and do not 
take into account newly released PPPs for 2011. 
3.11  A wide range of additional statistics are produced at country level by international organisations and 
can be accessed online from websites such as the World Bank (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator), the UN (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/databases.htm), the IMF (http://www.imf.org/external/data.htm) and the OECD (http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/). 
3.12  For each country and region, the repor 
t includes a summary breakdown of programme expenditure 
by sector in 2013–14. This expenditure reflects programmes managed by DFID country offices and regional teams as described in the published Operational Plans. The data is derived from DFID's input sector code system. This system permits each individual project to be allocated up to 8 codes which correspond to the sector where the relevant funds will be spent. The sector codes are derived largely from those used by the OECD Development Assistance Committee. Some char 
ts may not sum 
to exactly 100% due to rounding. 
3.13  Figure 3.1 shows the 2013–14 breakdown of all DFID's bilateral expenditure on the same basis. The 
sector receiving the highest overall amount was health (£1,174 million), followed by humanitarian (£891 million), wealth creation (£730 million) and then governance and security (£724 million). 
3.14  More detail on DFID's targets and plans to achieve the targets over the current spending review 
period 2012–15 can be found in Country Operational Plans. To view an Operational Plan, visit the relevant country page on the GOV
.UK website and click 'See all our publications'. 

Country programme 
DFID Ethiopia DFID Nigeria 
DFID Bangladesh DFID Pakistan 
DFID Afghanistan DFID Tanzania DFID India 
169.1 
DFID DRC 
162.2 
DFID South Sudan 
139.6 
DFID Kenya DFID Zimbabwe DFID Nepal DFID Uganda DFID Occupied Palestinian Territories DFID Ghana DFID Rwanda 
85.8 
DFID Malawi 
85.1 
DFID Somalia 
83.6 
DFID Yemen 
81.4 
DFID Mozambique DFID Burma DFID Sierra Leone 
68.6 
DFID Zambia 
66.6 
DFID Southern Africa 
50.3 
DFID Sudan 
48.0 
DFID Liberia 
9.0 
DFID Tajikistan DFID Kyrgyz Republic 
Out-turn expenditure 
(£million) 
284.4 266.2 
262.2 253.0 182.3 175.2 136.2 106.0 104.7 
94.7 
93.9 
90.8 77.4 69.7 
8.8 4.7 

## Afghanistan Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Over 30 years of conflict have left Afghanistan one of the poorest countries in the world. While progress has been made over the last decade, Afghanistan has a long way to go to achieve the MDGs and has agreed a 5 year extension until 2020. This year marks an impor tant transition and international troops will withdraw by the end of 2014. DFID's vision is for a more peaceful, stable, viable and prosperous Afghanistan. In suppor of this, the UK has committed to maintain current levels of assistance (£178 million per year) until at least 2017. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- suppor 
ting peace, security and political stability 
 
- promoting economic stability, growth and jobs 
 
- helping the state to deliver improved ser 
vices 
 
- suppor 
ting women and girls 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

UK suppor t has helped make progress on achieving universal primary education and promoting gender equality through suppor t to the Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF). 

DFID assistance helped to get approximately 4.5 million children into primary school in 2011–12, of which 1.8 million were girls - up from less than a million children under the Taliban, vir tually none of whom were girls. 36% of Afghans live below the national pover ty line. Nearly 1 
child in 10 dies before their fifth bir thday. DFID provided more than 320,000 people with humanitarian suppor t in 2013–14 and has suppor ted the creation of over 35,000 jobs since 2011. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Education: DFID assistance has helped to get approximately 
4.5 million children into primary school in 2011–12, of which 1.8 million were girls. 

Wealth creation: DFID assistance has created more than 
35,000 jobs since 2011. 

Wealth creation: DFID has contributed to rehabilitation of more than 500km of rural roads between 2012 and 2013. 

Humanitarian: DFID reached more than 320,000 people (more than 190,000 females) with lifesaving humanitarian support in 2013–14. This included support to internally displaced people and those affected by natural disaster
. 

Governance and security: The propor tion of the Afghan government's projected budget actually spent by the 10 highest spending ministries has increased from 44% in 2009–10 to 62% in 2013–14. 

Gender: With DFID suppor t, 55% of women representatives on community development councils are repor ting that they take an active par t in decision making compared to 35% in 
2011. 

 
Governance and security: With suppor t from DFID and other international par tners through the ARTF
, the number of Afghan government ministries completing pay and grading reforms has increased from 8 in 2011 to 21 in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 
 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population8 
27 million 
% living below $1.25 a day 
No data 
Fertility rate 
6.3 
% annual GDP growth rate 
14.4

## Afghanistan Programmes By Sector 2013–14 Total Spend £182.3 Million



ty, hunger and vulnerability 0.1%  

## Bangladesh Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14


Bangladesh is a poor and politically fragile country, highly vulnerable to natural disasters and already experiencing the effects of climate change and rapid urbanisation. Good progress has been made on development outcomes; income pover ty and maternal deaths have fallen and more girls are in school. Many challenges remain, however; 1 in 19 children die before they reach 5 years old and around 120,000 newborns die every year
. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- managing risks to development, including political  
governance/stability and climate related shocks  
 
- targeting off-track MDGs and accelerating progress; helping 
the country keep pace with its expanding population and urban migration 


- suppor 
ting Bangladesh to achieve target growth rates through 
a strengthened investment climate. Increasing access to jobs and developing skills to increase income for the poorest 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Bangladesh is on track to halve income pover ty by 2015, yet large inequalities remain. DFID is targeting the extreme poor, par ticularly women, by giving assets (eg livestock) and providing training to help them set up viable businesses. High levels of under-nutrition among women and children persist. DFID is targeting them with nutritional suppor t. Enrolment in primary education is high, par ticularly among girls, but dropout rates are high too. DFID is improving the quality of teaching in schools and focusing on those who remain excluded. Despite good progress on fer tility and maternal health, over 7,000 pregnant women die each year and there is still unmet need for family planning. DFID focuses on making sure more women can give bir th safely and fewer babies die, as well as ensuring family planning is available for all who need it, using the private sector to help. Bangladesh is off track on water and sanitation targets; 17% of the population lack access to an improved water source and 45% lack access to adequate sanitation facilities. DFID continues to work on providing safe water sources and improved toilets to the poor, par ticularly in urban slums. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Governance and security: An additional 720,000 registered taxpayers since 2011–12. 

Wealth creation: A net accumulated increase of $157 million in income for 1.4 million farmers and small businesses since 2012–13. 

Education: 366,000 children suppor ted to complete primary education since 2011–12, of which 208,000 were girls. 

 
 
Health: 352,000 bir ths attended by skilled personnel since 
2010–11. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: 742,000 people lifted out of extreme pover ty since 2010–11, of which 410,000 were women and girls. 

Climate change: Since 2011–12, 27 million people have been provided with access to systems for warning and information for floods and cyclones. 



Water and sanitation: 1.4 million people have been provided with access to clean drinking water since 2010–11 and 4 million people with access to adequate sanitation. 


## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Red 
Key statistics 
Population 
150 million 
43% 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
2.3 
% annual GDP growth rate 
6% 
Bangladesh programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £262.2 million 

## Burma Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Burma's aim is to harness its potential to help create a better governed, more peaceful and prosperous Burma that uses its increased wealth to improve education and health ser vices, and reduce pover ty. The remarkable process of change has given the UK a great oppor tunity to transform the lives of vulnerable people in Burma. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- promoting good governance, including improved  
transparency and the rule of law  
 
- promoting inclusive growth and responsible investment 
 
- strengthening parliament and elected bodies   
at sub-national levels  
 
- helping the process of peace building and ethnic reconciliation 
 
- suppor 
ting productive and sustainable livelihoods and  
improved access to better health and education ser 
vices  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Burma is off track to meet most of the MDGs and has some of the worst health indicators in Asia. Programmes to suppor t wealth creation and reduce pover ty, hunger and vulnerability are helping people access much needed credit and produce more food. It is critical that Burma contains the spread of drug resistant malaria and, with DFID suppor t, 500,000 people will receive appropriate treatment to contain the disease. Over the last 3 years, DFID has helped over 170,000 children to star t and complete primary education, and provided humanitarian aid to 349,000 people in conflict affected communities. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: 3 UK funded development finance organisations (International Finance Corporation, World Bank and Asian Development Bank) have committed capital to Burma to improve the investment environment, more transparent use of public funds, and to suppor t the private sector since 2012–13. 

Wealth creation: 115,000 women have been provided with access to financial services in 2013–14. 

Governance and security: DFID Burma contributed to sustaining improvements in political rights and civil liber ties as measured by Freedom House: Burma is still rated 'Not Free' but with improvements and a stable status. 

Governance and security: Since 2011–12 DFID has suppor ted 
120,000 people to have choice and control over their own development. 

Health: Since 2012–13 80,000 unintended pregnancies have been aver ted. 

Health: 376,000 women and men have received appropriate treatment to contain the spread of drug-resistant malaria since 2011–12. 

Education: 170,000 girls and boys assisted to overcome barriers to accessing and completing primary school in 2013–14. 

Humanitarian: 349,000 people in conflict affected communities provided with DFID humanitarian aid in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Grey 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
51.9 million 
No data 
% living below $1.25 a day 
2.1 
Fertility rate 
% annual GDP growth rate9 
7.3% 
Burma programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £69.7 million 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability 7.7% Reproductive, maternal and newborn health 12.1%  
Water and sanitation 0.3%  
Wealth creation 22.3%  
 

## Democratic Republic Of Congo (Drc) Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14


DRC has enormous potential. Decades of poor governance, chronic corruption and civil war have, however
, taken their toll and DRC languishes at the bottom of the UN's Human Development Index. But DRC's political environment is more stable than it was a decade ago, and its economy is showing some signs of growth. Armed conflict remains a major challenge. Poor governance and corruption continue to deter foreign investment and stifle economic growth. In 2013–14 DFID spent £162.2 million on its programmes in DRC. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- suppor 
t the establishment of peace and stability in the  
country and ensure humanitarian needs are met  
 
- invest in infrastructure and basic service provision, while  
promoting better governance to ensure improvements are maintained in the longer term  
 
 
- suppor 
t sound economic management, with the promotion of  
a better enabling environment for the private sector  

## Contribution To The Mdgs


DRC is unlikely to meet any of the MDGs by 2015. DFID's programmes suppor t progress across all MDG areas in DRC, focusing on the delivery of inclusive, quality and sustainable services. DFID's largest investment between 2011 and 2015 in terms of sectors is health, which will help suppor t the reduction of child mor tality, as well as improvements in maternal health and combating malaria. DFID has also increased investment in improving access to water and sanitation (by an additional £63 million from 2011 to 2015), helping to deliver improvements across a number of MDG areas. New programmes continue to be designed in the education and political governance sectors. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Governance and security: DFID's support has improved access to security and justice services for 378,000 women and girls since 2009; and gave more than 1.7 million people choice and control over their own development in 2012–13. 

Health: More than 4.6 million insecticide treated bed nets have been distributed since 2011–12 with DFID suppor t; 
and through DFID health programmes, 334,000 babies have been delivered with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors since 2011. 

Water, sanitation and hygiene: DFID assistance has given 
922,000 people sustainable access to water, sanitation or hygiene since the end of 2008. 

Humanitarian: DFID suppor t reached more than 152,000 
people who were provided with emergency food assistance during a one month period in 2013. 

Wealth creation: In 2013, 300km of roads were built or upgraded with DFID suppor t. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
62.2 million 
87.7 
% living below $1.25 a day 
 
(2006) Fertility rate 
6.5 
% annual GDP growth rate 
7.2 

## Ethiopia Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Ethiopia is populous and poor
, with low per capita domestic, donor and other resources. The government's commitment to poverty reduction, economic growth and strengthening financial management is strong. There have been marked improvements in poverty reduction and progress on most economic and social rights is on a broadly positive trend, with the government taking steps to address some persisting inequalities, including on gender
. 

Concerns remain about limitations on other
, primarily civil and political, rights. As the government enters its next 5 year planning period, there are important opportunities to: increase economic transformation; improve quality and equality in service delivery; improve good governance; enhance the position of women and girls; and further build resilience to external shocks. 


  

## Top Priorities:

 
- suppor 
t for economic development and an increased role 
for the private sector 
 
- advance gender equality and empowerment of women  
and girls  
 
- boost Ethiopia's tax collection capability and the  
accountability of its democratic institutions  
 
- build resilience to avoid future humanitarian crises in Ethiopia 
and enable it to respond better 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Star ting from a low base, strong investment, including significant DFID funding, in social ser vices has driven good progress against many of the MDG indicators. The propor tion of the population living below $1.25 a day has fallen to 31% from 35% in 2005; and MDG 5 on child mor tality has already been attained. Despite this progress there remain significant challenges. There are still over 25 million people living in extreme pover ty
. DFID suppor t to national programmes in health has contributed to an increase in the propor tion of skilled bir th attendance to 23% in 2013 (from 
20% in 2012) yet the maternal mor tality rate remains stubbornly high. Net enrolment rates in primary education have levelled off although the numbers of children in school continue to increase suppor ted by DFID Ethiopia's largest sector investment. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Education: During 2012–13, DFID suppor ted 2.5 million children in primary education, nearly half of whom were girls. 

Health: Since 2011–12 DFID funding has ensured over  
325,000 bir ths have been delivered by skilled health  
professionals.  
Water and sanitation: DFID assistance provided 300,000 more people with access to clean drinking water in 2012–13. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: Nearly 3 million pregnant women and children were reached by DFID suppor ted nutrition inter ventions in 2012–13. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: Nearly 270,000 individuals have become more food secure through DFID suppor t to the Productive Safety Nets Programme since 2011–12. 

Humanitarian: In 2013, DFID Ethiopia provided emergency food assistance for 2.6 million people. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Amber 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Red 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Amber 

## Key Statistics

Population 
87.1 million 
30.7 
% living below $1.25 a day 
 
(2011) Fertility rate 
4.8 
% annual GDP growth rate 
8.5 
Ethiopia programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £284.4 million 

 

Wealth creation 2.4%  

## Ghana Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Ghana is a stable democracy that has benefited from a long period of political stability and sustained economic growth. Growth has slowed somewhat recently and there are risks in the shor t term, par ticularly around macroeconomic instability. 

Tackling income and regional inequality, delivering suppor t and ser vices to the most vulnerable, and ensuring shared growth will play a vital role in suppor ting fur ther pover ty reduction. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- robust, inclusive and transformational economic growth that 
will result in more and better jobs, and increase incomes for Ghanaians 
 
- ensuring no one is left behind, DFID is suppor 
ting pover 
ty 
reduction and growth in the nor 
th of Ghana, and helping to 
improve the lives of women and girls, par 
ticularly through 
improved health and increasing their education and economic oppor 
tunities 
 
- moving towards a sustainable self-financed exit from pover 
ty, 
including through competent, transparent and accountable governance and improved capacity to deliver ser 
vices 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Ghana is on track to halve income pover ty by 2015, yet large inequalities remain. DFID is suppor ting the Government of Ghana's cash transfer programme for the poorest and most vulnerable. Enrolment in primary education has seen substantial increases but has stagnated in recent years. DFID is suppor ting children's enrolment in school through helping children not in school return to mainstream education, and providing incentive packages for girls to stay in secondary education. DFID is suppor ting the Government of Ghana scheme for universal anti­
malarial bed net coverage and deepening the private sector's role in preventing malaria. DFID is working to address the unmet need for family planning through purchase of commodities and delivery of family planning ser vices, with a par ticular focus on adolescent girls. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: DFID has helped nearly 5,000 producers 
(1,600 women) in the nor th of Ghana to access business services since 2012–13. 

Health: Since 2011–12, DFID has suppor ted just under 
550,000 women users of family planning. 

Health: DFID suppor t has meant that just under 5.5 million bed nets have been distributed since 2011–12. 

Poverty reduction: In 2013–14, nearly 160,000 (88,000 women and girls) received DFID suppor ted cash grants. 

Education: In 2013–14, 24,000 girls received targeted incentives to stay in secondary education.  
Governance and security: Since 2011–12, 250,000 people 
(120,000 women) have been suppor ted to influence their own development and to hold decision makers to account. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Amber 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
24.3 million 
28.6 
% living below $1.25 a day (2006) 
 
Fertility rate 
4.2 
% annual GDP growth rate10 
7.1 
Ghana programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £90.8 million 

## India Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

DFID's par tnership with India is in transition. As par t of the new development relationship DFID stopped approving new financial grant aid in 2012. However
, DFID will honour commitments to existing projects, all of which will finish in 2015. After 2015 DFID's par tnership will focus on sharing skills and exper tise and making private sector investments which will help the poorest people and generate returns; and strengthening par tnership on global development issues such as food security and climate change. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- catalyse the private sector's potential to combat pover 
ty in the  
8 poorest states using technical assistance and returnable capital mechanism  
 
- deepen the UK's engagement with India on global  
development issues  
 
- improve the lives of over 10 million poor women and girls in  
3 of the poorest states to help them access quality schooling, healthcare, nutrition and jobs  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Pover ty is falling rapidly and India will meet the target to halve the propor tion of people living under $1.25 per day, as well as the targets for education enrolment and maternal mor tality. 

However, India is off track to meet targets of reducing under 5 mor tality and underweight children. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Across 8 low income states, 26 new public private par tnership deals have been awarded since 2011–12. 

Climate change: Over 600,000 additional people have had  
access to low carbon energy since 2011–12.  
Health: Over 310,000 babies have been delivered more safely with the help of nurses, midwives or doctors since 2011–12. 

 
 
Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: Over 3.5 million pregnant  
women and children under 5 were covered by nutrition programmes in 8 low income states in 2013–14.  
Water and sanitation: Over 1.2 million people have sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility. 

Education: Between 2011–12 and 2013–14 DFID has suppor ted over 840,000 children (400,000 girls) in primary school and over 550,000 children (270,000 girls) in junior secondary school. 

Governance and security: Over 5 million people (3 million women) since 2011–12 have been suppor ted to have choice and control over their own development and to hold decision makers to account. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 


Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
1,210.5 million 
32.7 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
2.7 
% annual GDP growth rate 
3.2 

## Kenya Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Kenya is one of around 10 DFID countries where the number of poor people is thought to be rising, due to low economic growth, rising inequality and high population growth. Although it has the largest and most diversified economy in east Africa, its economic growth is lagging behind its peers due to political and climatic shocks and weak competitiveness.  

## Top Priorities:

 
- strengthen democracy through improving the capacity and  
accountability of national and local government  
 
- promote broad based sustainable economic development  
and job creation through improving the investment climate, market development, trade and access to finance  
 
- strengthen systems for delivering health, education and social  
protection ser 
vices  
 
- ensure that no one is left behind from development  
processes, including women and girls, the extreme poor living in Kenya's Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASALs), and refugees from neighbouring countries  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Kenya's progress on the pover ty MDG (the propor tion of people living below $1.25 a day) is lagging. The UK is suppor ting market development and financial inclusion, which are key ingredients to growth, and enabling more people to move out of pover ty, including women and girls. The poorest Kenyans live in climate vulnerable arid and semi-arid areas where a package of DFID programmes (including cash transfers, climate change adaptation and drought management) will strengthen household resilience to shocks and stresses. DFID also has programmes aimed at helping women to access health services, par ticularly maternal health, and providing modern family planning. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Climate change: In 2013–14, 120,000 Kenyans were suppor ted to cope with the effects of climate change and almost 130,000 
were suppor ted to have access to clean energy, half of whom were women. 

Wealth creation: DFID suppor ted the creation of 3,000 
jobs and contributed suppor t enabling 12.4 million people, 
5 million of whom were women, to have access to financial services in 2013–14. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: 100,000 households 
(665,000 people) benefited from DFID funded cash transfers through the Hunger Safety Net and Orphan and Vulnerable Children programmes in 2013–14. Over two thirds of these households were headed by women. 

 
Health: DFID suppor ted 360,000 women to use modern family planning methods in 2013–14 and has suppor ted the distribution of almost 6.5 million bed nets, predominantly to pregnant women, since 2011–12. 

Education: 97,000 children received suppor t to be in primary education and to improve their learning in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Red 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Amber 

## Key Statistics

Population 
40.1 million 
43.4 
% living below $1.25 a day (2005) 
 
Fertility rate 
4.8 
% annual GDP growth rate 
4.6 

## Kyrgyz Republic Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Kyrgyz Republic is the second poorest country in central Asia with GDP per capita of $880. The economic base is narrow, fragile and dependent on remittances (which represented 35% of GDP in 2012), trade and transit. Social indicators are poor. Ethnic tension, often mobilised by political par ties and other groupings, has periodically derailed economic growth. The national pover ty rate has reduced to 38%, but with negligible improvement since 2009. Economic and democratic gains have not been consolidated and risk reversal. After the 2010 revolution the Kyrgyz Republic established a Parliamentary Democracy, the only one in the former Soviet Central Asia. Political par ties are not yet sufficiently familiar with this model to make it work efficiently. Robust debate and challenge between par ties and factions within Parliament has contributed to delays in enacting much needed reforms. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- promote stability and development through improved and 
more transparent public finance management, including anti-corruption activities, which will drive better delivery of social services 
 
- providing advice to parliamentarians on how to operate 
effectively within the fledgling parliamentary democracy and to hold government better to account for delivery of benefits to citizens 
 
- suppor 
t for an improved business regulatory environment to 
encourage private sector investment and generate jobs 

## Contribution To The Mdgs


 

DFID promotes stability and development through suppor t to governance and ser vice delivery
. Investment in public finance management helps deliver efficient budget allocations, in line with development priorities, indirectly improving service delivery Complementary investments in civil society and democratic institutions, including parliament, are holding the government to account for financial management and service delivery, and helping to tackle corruption. DFID suppor t to government monitoring systems is building capacity to track pover ty and development indicators and to increase capacity for analytical work which will inform policy development. A major regional programme aims to improve the benefits from labour migration. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Governance and security: In 2013–14 the Open Budget Index improved by 25% as a result of a DFID funded project. 

Wealth creation: Since 2010 a total of 435,000 labour migrants from Kyrgyz Republic were provided with key advice in information centres financed by DFID's Regional Migration programme. 

Health: The DFID funded EQUITY project has contributed to a decrease in the infant mor tality rate of 11.5% in 2013–14 
since the 2009 baseline. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Green 
Key statistics 
 
Population 
5.3 million 
5 
% living below $1.25 a day (2011) Fertility rate 
2.78 
% annual GDP growth rate 
-0.9 
Kyrgyz Republic  
programmes by sector 2013–14  
Total spend £4.7 million 

## Liberia Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

DFID has a small bilateral programme in Liberia focused on a few niche sectors and managed from the Sierra Leone office. 

Liberia is a highly aided country ($186.59 per capita) but still has a pover ty rate of 56.3%. Economic growth has averaged just over 7% a year since 2004, but the economy remains very small (GDP £1.4 billion in 2014). Liberia is 12th from the bottom of the global Human Development Index and it is ranked 62 out of 86 countries in the 2012 Social Institutions and Gender Index, with some of the worst social indicators in the world. With elections due in 2017, President Sirleaf's 2 terms (a total of 12 years) will end and it will be critical to see whether a smooth transition can be made from post war society to a low-income but politically stable one. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- infrastructure rehabilitation focused on roads, water, sanitation  
and hygiene and solid waste management  
 
- reforming the health sector 
 
- future focus of DFID's bilateral programme will be 
infrastructure, natural resources, revenue mobilisation and economic empowerment of girls and women 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Liberia has some of the worst infant and maternal mor tality rates in Africa. DFID's suppor t in 2013–14 focused on reforming the health sector and rehabilitating infrastructure, which are essential if Liberia is to continue attracting international private sector investors and fur ther stimulate the economy. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Water and sanitation: More than 250 tonnes per day of municipal solid waste collected in the capital city Monrovia through proper channels in 2013–14. 

Health: 4,000 bir ths attended by a skilled bir th attendant in 2012–13; national infant mor tality rate of 54 deaths per 
1,000 live bir ths in 2013. 

Wealth creation: 96km of road rehabilitated and/or reconstructed since 2011–12. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
4 million 
83.8 
% living below $1.25 a day (2007) Fertility rate 
5.2 
% annual GDP growth rate 
10.2 

## Malawi Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Malawi is a small, landlocked, agriculturally dependent country in Southern Africa. It is also one of the poorest and ranks 170 
out of 187 in the Human Development Index. The latest income pover ty survey showed that rural pover ty has increased in the last decade to 57% of the rural population. Although fragile and despite many challenges, Malawi's macro-economy has shown some signs of improvement over the last year. However, poor governance and corruption continue to prevent Malawi from achieving its full potential. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- addressing pover 
ty and inequality through investment in  
education, health, agriculture, water and sanitation with an emphasis on the rights of girls and women  
 
- suppor 
ting wealth creation and economic growth by  
expanding DFID's private sector development por 
tfolio to  
improve growth in the agricultural sector  
 
-  promoting an open society and more capable, accountable 
and responsive governance. DFID's work suppor 
ts increasing 
access to justice for women and vulnerable groups, suppor 
ting accountability and governance reforms and 
preparing for the 2014 general elections 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Progress is off track on several MDGs in Malawi. DFID's work in resilience is helping to improve rural incomes and reduce the vulnerability of farmers to external shocks. More women are being helped to access finance through village savings and loan schemes. DFID's education work is helping to improve gender parity in the last years of primary and secondary school. DFID is increasing its focus on nutrition and by 2015 will have supported 750,000 people to have access to clean water
. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: 26,000 additional people were suppor ted to access credit through DFID suppor t in 2013–14. Out of this 
21,000 were women. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: An additional 74,000 people were suppor ted to cope with natural disasters and the effects of climate change in 2013–14. 

Girls' education: 13,000 girls have been enrolled in secondary school with DFID suppor ted bursaries since 2012–13. 

Primary education: 480,000 children were suppor ted by DFID 
in primary school in 2012–13. 

Health: An additional 70,000 women were using modern methods of family planning through DFID suppor t in 2013–14. 

 
Water and sanitation: An additional 140,000 people were provided with sustainable access to clean drinking water and an improved sanitation facility in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Amber 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Amber 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
15 million 
61.6 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
5.8 
% annual GDP growth rate 
1.9 


Malawi programmes by sector 2013–14 

## Mozambique Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Mozambique remains one of the world's poorest countries: it ranked 185th out of 186 in the 2013 UN Human Development Index, while 60% of Mozambicans live on less than $1.25 day and 55% below the national pover ty line for basic needs. 

However, Mozambique also has had one of the fastest growing economies in the world with GDP growth averaging 7% over 2001–11. The country will reach a crossroads within the next decade, with the potential to accelerate development as a result of the discovery of large coal and gas reser ves. It also has excellent potential for agriculture and as a gateway country for landlocked countries. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- suppor 
t basic service provision for health, education, water  
and sanitation  
 
- improve the ability of citizens to hold decision makers to  
account  
 
- drive more inclusive economic growth, ensuring that the  
poorest in Mozambique benefit from the potential in sectors such as agriculture and natural resources  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

DFID is contributing to Mozambique's efforts on MDG 1 through initiatives to promote economic development and reduce poverty
. 

This includes support for agricultural development, provision of cash transfers for the most vulnerable and projects to increase access to finance. DFID is helping to deliver results in 3 key social sectors (MDGs 2 to 7). In education, there is an emphasis on improving the quality of provision - with support provided for a national assessment survey of basic reading skills during 2013–14. DFID support is being provided to the health sector to address all MDG areas but with an emphasis on maternal and infant health and family planning. DFID support for water and sanitation is targeted on increasing rural access. 

  

  

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Since 2011–12: 
Poverty: An average of 61,000 poor people received cash transfers. 

Education: 33,000 children supported to complete primary school and an annual average of 21,000 children supported to enrol in secondary school. 

Health: 89,000 assisted bir ths and 30,000 pregnant women suppor ted with malaria treatment. 

Sanitation: 168,000 additional people suppor ted to receive access to sanitation. 

Governance: An average of 21,000 people supported to hold decision makers to account. 

Wealth creation: 67,000 people suppor ted to gain access to land. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
25 million 
59.6 
% living below $1.25 a day (2008) Fertility rate 
5.57 


% annual GDP growth rate 
7.1 
Mozambique programmes 
by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £77.4 million 


## Nepal Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Nepal is among the 20 poorest countries in the world, suffering from high levels of inequality and social exclusion. While there is peace and a return to conflict is unlikely, corruption, poor infrastructure and weak economic policies, as well as political uncer tainty, mean that Nepal tends to lag behind the rest of the region in development terms. Nepal has made progress in some areas, par ticularly in health, and pover ty levels continue to fall. 

Nepal is also one of the 20 most disaster prone countries in the world with more than 4,000 disaster related fatalities in the last 10 years and economic losses of over £3 billion. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- governance and security 
 
- make government more effective and able to deliver better 
services to the poor 
 
- help people, par 
ticularly women, benefit from economic 
growth 
 
- help Nepal tackle climate change and natural disasters  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

DFID's programmes address poverty and hunger by targeting the most vulnerable with activities such as providing employment in road building programmes and helping farmers improve their incomes. DFID's health programme focuses on maternal health by providing cash incentives and free delivery care to encourage the poorest to give birth in health facilities, free care across a range of health services, and clean water and sanitation. In education, DFID support to date has helped government deliver free basic education for girls as well as boys. DFID's climate change and forestry work ensure poor people's livelihoods are enhanced through forestry development, and vulnerable people are resilient to the impacts of climate change or natural disasters. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Between 2011–12 and 2013–14 DFID 
suppor ted 160,000 jobs to be created, 4,000km of roads to be either built or upgraded, and 440,000 people to improve their land and proper ty rights. 

Governance and security: In 2013–14 DFID provided substantial election suppor t which contributed to nearly 
10 million people voting, of whom over half were women. 

Human development: Between 2011–12 and 2013–14 DFID 
suppor ted 450,000 people to access clean drinking water, sanitation or hygiene services, 40,000 children in primary education and 50,000 women to use family planning services. 

Climate change and disaster risk reduction: Between 2011–12 
and 2013–14 DFID suppor ted over 1.4 million people to increase their climate and disaster resilience, 220,000 people with improved access to clean energy, and 5,000 hectares of forest to be brought under community management. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
26.8 million 
24.8 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
3 
% annual GDP growth rate 
4.9 

## Nepal Programmes By Sector 2013–14 Nigeria Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Nigeria is home to 160 million people, but more than 100 million live on less than £1 per day. A stable, better governed and prosperous Nigeria would rapidly reduce pover ty. It would also hugely benefit UK trade, energy and security interests, and help reduce crime and illegal migration. 2013–14 has seen a worsening of the security situation for many Nigerians, both in terms of terrorist activity and state response and rising inter­ communal tensions. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- providing more people with better ser 
vices, including 
education, healthcare and access to safe water and sanitation 
 
- helping Nigeria use its oil revenues to improve the lives  
of its citizens  
 
- help establish an enabling governance environment  
for tackling corruption and enhancing transparency and accountability  

## Contribution To The Mdgs


Progress is off track on all MDGs in Nigeria. With massive inequality
, effective management of growth plays a significant part in Nigeria's development and is a sector DFID is focusing strongly on. DFID is also supporting the improved delivery of basic services, particularly in northern Nigeria, where the indicators are lagging the most. In health DFID is overachieving on its targets for births attended by skilled health workers. DFID is also overachieving on its target of numbers of people with sustainable access to clean water sources. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Since 2012–13 DFID programmes have helped raise the incomes of 470,000 Nigerians by more than 15%. 

Governance: DFID Nigeria programmes have provided suppor t for almost 440,000 people to have control over their own development and hold decision makers to account since 2011–12. 

Health: 430,000 bir ths in Nigeria have been attended by skilled health workers since 2011–12. 

Water, sanitation and hygiene: Between April and December 
2013 just over 510,000 Nigerians gained access to clean drinking water. 

Poverty and hunger: Since 2011–12 over 4 million pregnant women and children under 5 have received interventions to improve nutrition. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Red 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
159.7 million 
63.0 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
6 
% annual GDP growth rate 
6.5 
Nigeria programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £266.2 million 

## Occupied Palestinian Territories Country Summary

DFID's programme in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) is suppor ting the UK's Middle East Peace Process 
(MEPP) policy by building Palestinian institutions and promoting economic growth, so that any future state will be stable, prosperous, well run and an effective par tner for peace with Israel. The OPTs are one of the poorest par ts of the region with a GDP per capita of $1,679 in 2012. After several years of high growth, averaging 8% between 2007 and 2011, the Palestinian economy has slowed. Lack of meaningful progress in the MEPP and continuing movement and access restrictions have dampened private sector investment. The situation in Gaza is par ticularly concerning with the economy shrinking by 17% 
in the 6 years to 2011. A quar ter of Palestinians are currently unemployed and only 15% of women are in the labour force. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- helping the Palestinian Authority to build strong institutions 
and enable them to deliver essential services including policing, health and education 
 
- promoting private sector growth to stimulate the economy and 
create jobs 
 
- providing humanitarian assistance and suppor 
t to the  
vulnerable  

## Contribution To The Mdgs

The OPTs have made positive headway against some MDGs. However
, the continuing occupation of the Palestinian territories makes it difficult to make faster progress. The blockade of Gaza has sharply reduced access to the water supply for 1.7 million Palestinians, with only a quarter of households receiving running water on a daily basis. DFID's financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority is enabling it to deliver important education and health services and security to the population. DFID is helping Palestinian communities challenge eviction and demolition orders which threaten livelihoods. The UK also funds the UN Relief and Works Agency to provide basic services and humanitarian supplies to Palestinian refugees in the OPTs, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: DFID assistance has resulted in 350 
enterprises repor ting improved performance in sales or productivity between 2011–12 and 2013–14. 

Wealth creation: DFID suppor ted just under 70,000 people to improve their rights to land and proper ty between  
2011–12 and 2013–14. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: DFID reached 280,000 
individuals through cash transfer programmes in 2013–14. 

Education: DFID suppor ted 50,000 children in primary education in 2012–13 of whom 50% were girls. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Amber 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
4 million 
26 
% living below the national poverty line11 
(2011) 
Fertility rate 
4.4 
% annual GDP growth rate12 
5.9 
Occupied Palestinian Territories 
programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £93.9 million 

## Pakistan Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Approximately 66 million Pakistanis live in poverty and 12 million children are out of school. One in 11 children die before their fifth birthday and 12,000 women die in childbirth every year
. 

The population is set to rise by 50% in less than 40 years. UK development spend in Pakistan is an investment in a more prosperous, more stable country which will not only help millions of poor Pakistanis, but will also improve stability and security in the region, and beyond. 


## Top Priorities:

 
- creating jobs and suppor 
ting economic growth 
 
- increasing access to and quality of education 
 
- women and children's health 
 
- strengthening democracy and governance 
 
- building peace and stability 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

In Pakistan the education challenges are immense, with half the adult population unable to read or write. UK support is focused on improving the quality of and access to education, and building the political and social pressure for access to quality education. Since 2011 UK support has benefited over 9 million primary school children. Pakistan has the fourth highest number of maternal deaths and under 5 mortality rates in the world. Progress has been slow in reducing these rates. UK support aims to increase the number of additional births delivered with trained medical staff to 1 million by 2015, already achieving 700,000. DFID will provide an additional 500,000 couples with access to family planning, and reduce the number of under-nourished children by 340,000. Only 8% of the population have access to microfinance services.13 The UK 
government through its support to the microfinance sector in Pakistan will help reach 1.23 million people by 2015 (over half of them women). UK support to Pakistan's national social protection programme will help at least 2.5 million people meet their basic needs for food, health and education by 2015. UK support will also help nearly 70,000 people obtain marketable skills to improve their livelihoods, of whom 40% are women. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: 860,000 additional people have accessed microfinance since 2011–12. 35,000 people had been trained in new skills by the end of 2013–14. 

Governance and security: 47 million voted in the May 2013 
general elections - 10 million more than previous elections. 

Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: At least 2.5 million people have received DFID supported cash transfers since 2010–11. 

Education: 9 million children in primary school, 4 million in secondary school and 3 million primary completers benefited from DFID suppor t in 2013–14. 

Humanitarian: 3.5 million flood-affected individuals had been reached with humanitarian assistance by 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Red 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
185 million 
36 
% living below net pover 
ty line14 


(2008) 
Fertility rate 
3.8 
% annual GDP growth rate15 
4.1 
Pakistan programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £253.0 million 

## Rwanda Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Rwanda has achieved significant progress since the devastating genocide of 1994. Pover ty within Rwanda declined by 12% 
between 2005–06 and 2010–11. Yet 4.7 million people in Rwanda live below the national pover ty line, of whom 2.5 million live in extreme pover ty. Reliance on low income agriculture and agricultural wage labour makes the majority of poor people's livelihoods very fragile. In July and December 2013, the UK agreed with the Government of Rwanda to reprogramme a total of £37 million general budget suppor t into specific sectors using government systems. These funds have been released into the education, social protection and agriculture sectors to directly suppor t some of the poorest people in Rwanda. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- transformation from an agricultural economy to private sector 
led growth 
 
- significantly improved services that deliver the MDGs 
 
- increased accountability of the state to citizens and 
empowerment of girls, women and the extreme poor 
 
- transition to more open and inclusive politics and enhanced 
human rights 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

The UK suppor ted progress towards the MDGs primarily through sector budget suppor t and financial assistance, helping the Government of Rwanda improve its essential services to the poor. UK priorities included suppor ting education (basic and post basic education) and social protection (addressing the pover ty MDG). The UK is also suppor ting Rwanda to strengthen its agriculture productivity; continue its economic growth through private sector development and regional trade; increase people's land ownership; improve access to finance; and combat climate change. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Since 2010–11, almost 3.3 million land titles have been issued and in 2013–14, over 120,000 people secured access to financial services as a result of UK suppor t. 

Poverty, vulnerability, nutrition and hunger: In 2012–13 over 
380,000 of the poorest people were suppor ted through cash transfers to meet their basic needs/secure jobs. 

Governance and security: DFID supported 1.8 million people to have a choice and control over their own development and hold decision makers to account in 2013–14. 

Education: Since 2010–11, a peak of 245,000 children have been suppor ted by DFID in primary education, of whom 49% 
were girls. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Amber 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population16 
10.5 million 
63.2 
% living below $1.25 a day (2011) Fertility rate 
4.0 
% annual GDP growth rate 
4.6 
Rwanda programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £85.8 million 

## Sierra Leone Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Sierra Leone is entering a new phase of growth and development after a largely successful period of post-conflict reconstruction. This transition was formally marked by the closure of the UN peacebuilding mission in March 2014. The signing of a Mutual Accountability Framework by government and development par tners (led by DFID on the donor side) 
is also an impor tant marker of a change in the terms of international engagement. The country must now tackle a number of deeply rooted structural challenges including corruption, low capacity levels, weaknesses in the rule of law, and high levels of discrimination and social exclusion (par ticularly for women). 

## Top Priorities:

 
- improving education (especially for girls, children with  
disabilities and the most marginalised), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and health services  
 
- suppor 
ting reform and improvement of electricity services 
 
- suppor 
t to the private sector, in par 
ticular to small and  
medium sized enterprises and the extractives sector  
 
- improving public financial management, revenue collection  
and accountability  
 
- tackling corruption through a new and innovative Pay No  
Bribe programme  
 
- improving access to security and justice 
 
- suppor 
ting the Constitutional Review and the electoral cycle 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Progress towards education, health and WASH MDGs has been variable, but slow overall. In education, DFID is increasing primary school access and participation and raising education quality in primary and junior secondary schools. In health, DFID is strengthening health systems, improving reproductive, maternal and newborn health, and works alongside the Ministry of Health and Sanitation in the institutionalisation of free healthcare. In WASH, DFID is strengthening delivery of and access to improved water sources, sanitation and hygiene education, including WASH facilities in schools and primary healthcare units, underpinning progress in education and health. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Governance and security: Over one fifth of remote communities now with access to mediators and paralegal services; almost 300,000 more women and girls with improved access to security and justice in 2013–14. 

Water and sanitation: Over 1.1 million people gained access to improved sanitation facilities since 2011–12. 

Health: Over 50,000 bir ths delivered by skilled health personnel since 2011–12 and almost 40,000 women used a modern method of family planning for the first time in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Red 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Grey 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Amber 

## Key Statistics

Population 
5.8 million 
51.7 
% living below $1.25 a day (2011) 
Fertility rate 
5.2 
% annual GDP growth rate 
15.2
Sierra Leone programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £68.6 million 

 

## Somalia Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Somalia has suffered from 20 years of conflict leading to severe under-development and humanitarian need. Regional instability threatens the interests of other nations through terrorism, illegal migration and piracy. A new federal government took office in Somalia in September 2012. In addition to its humanitarian programme in Somalia, DFID is working closely on development goals with the new administration. International suppor t for several of the government's development priorities was confirmed at the Somalia Conference in London in May 2013. The programme covers South Central, Puntland and Somaliland, recognising the differences in context and oppor tunities. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- investing in strengthening political settlements, accountable 
governance, security and local reconciliation 
 
- addressing immediate social development needs among the 
most vulnerable populations  
 
- expanding work on growth and growth transmission 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

There is cross-UK government consensus that state building is the right overarching approach for UK support to Somalia. As such DFID Somalia does not contribute to all of the MDGs. From 2014, DFID will scale up its economic development work (MDG1) concentrating on creating jobs and livelihoods; access to finance and business development; strengthening economic governance; and supporting regional trade. DFID is also supporting low cost, low carbon energy (MDG7) to tackle one of the constraints to growth. Somalia has some of the worst MDG indicators on health. DFID is enhancing access to quality health services, in particular focusing on women and girls, including through its flagship work on tackling female genital mutilation (MDG 4 and 5). 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Governance: 7,000 girls and women accessed security and justice ser vices in 2013–14. The UN Joint Programme on Local Governance is now operating in 16 districts in Somalia, helping to develop and cost district development plans and ensure resources are allocated to them. 

Humanitarian: 378,000 people were provided with emergency food assistance in 2013–14. 

Nutrition: 55,000 children and pregnant women were reached with nutrition inter ventions and 120,000 children benefited from acute malnutrition prevention programmes in 2013–14, of whom 60,000 were girls. 

Wealth creation: 27,000 jobs were created in 2013–14, of which 16,000 were for women.  
Health: 25,000 contraceptives were distributed in 2013–14. 

6,000 bir ths were attended by skilled professionals in  
2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Grey 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Grey 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Red 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
9.6 million 
% living below $1.25 a day 
No data 
Fertility rate 
7.1 
% annual GDP growth rate 
No data 
Somalia programmes by sector 2013–14 


Total spend £83.6 million 

## South Africa Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

South Africa has the largest economy in sub-Saharan Africa. It plays an impor tant role in regional institutions such as the African Union and its presence in the G20 and the BRICS marks its status as an emerging global power
. DFID Southern Africa is increasingly working with South Africa on issues which have an impact beyond its borders, such as regional trade and climate change. From 2015, DFID's bilateral programme in South Africa will end, reflecting a new relationship between the UK and South Africa. 


## Top Priorities

 
- creating growth and jobs 
 
- tackling HIV and reducing maternal and child deaths 
 
- promoting inclusive and low carbon growth 
 
- preventing violence against women and children 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

DFID is working with the South African government, civil society and business - helping to translate the country's own resources into better lives for poor people. The UK's suppor t to job creation in South Africa and regional trade integration is helping to create conditions for growth across the region. DFID contributes to maternal and child mor tality reduction through support to the Maternal, Newborn, Child and Women's Strategy, focusing on 25 districts with the worst outcomes. South Africa's response to HIV and AIDS and tuberculosis is being strengthened through the National Aid Council and government reforms to the health sector
. DFID is working to suppor t South Africa's response to reduce violence against women and children and improving government's accountability to citizens on service delivery
. DFID 
is suppor ting South Africa in meeting its ambitious international pledges on transition to a low carbon economy, though this will need to accelerate if these pledges are to be fully realised. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results National:

Governance: Contributed to the par ticipation of 21,000 
people in government or community monitoring since 2011–12. 

Wealth creation: Suppor ted 98,000 people with access to micro-insurance in 2013–14. 

## Regional:17

Wealth creation: 880,000 people benefiting directly from new or improved par ticipation in national and cross-border value chains (eg regional food markets) since 2011–12. 

Climate change: 710,000 people benefiting from improved management of shared water basins since 2011–12. 

Climate change: 140,000 people with improved access to low carbon energy since 2011–12. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education19 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Green 

## Key Statistics

Population 
51.5 million 
13.8 
% living below $1.25 a day (2009) 
Fertility rate 
2.6 
% annual GDP growth rate 
2.5 
South Africa programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £50.3 million 

newborn health 14.1% Water and sanitation 2.0% Wealth creation 11.4% 

## South Sudan Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

 

The outbreak of conflict in December 2013 in Juba and subsequently elsewhere in the country was disastrous for South Sudan. Since independence on 9 July 2011, the new country has struggled with huge development challenges. Decades of war have left a legacy of chronic pover ty, inequality, and limited capacity and infrastructure. The first par t of 2013 saw some initial progress towards establishing a more development focused approach. That progress was reversed by the outbreak of conflict. Since the star t of the violence, thousands of people have been killed, and over 1 million have fled their homes, including to neighbouring countries. Despite the signing of a cessation of hostilities agreement, fighting has continued. By April 2014, 4.9 million people were in urgent need of humanitarian aid. In late 2013–14 the UK developed an interim strategy in response to the conflict. This reflects a shift from 'business as usual'. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- humanitarian response and strengthening resilience,  
par 
ticularly in the area of food security  
 
- basic ser 
vices in health and education, suppor 
ting the most 
vulnerable, especially women and girls 
 
- focused work on governance where we can suppor 
t  
reconciliation and peacebuilding  
 
- underpin all programmes with a strong focus on conflict 
sensitivity 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

The UK's work in South Sudan is making an impor tant contribution to addressing MDG challenges with a par ticular focus on girls, women and vulnerable groups. DFID's humanitarian programmes address immediate needs, including shelter and food, and improving access to health, nutrition, water and sanitation facilities. The Health Pooled Fund has a strong focus on improving the health status of women and children. DFID's education work suppor ts children in primary and secondary education with a par ticular focus on girls. DFID's livelihoods programmes builds resilience of communities to withstand food security risks and future challenges. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

The ongoing conflict has hampered programme delivery in South Sudan. This has led to lower than expected 2013–14 results for some programmes. 

Education: Suppor ted just under 7,000 pupils in secondary  
education, including nearly 2,000 female pupils in 2013–14.   
Education: Over 6.5 million textbooks printed and distributed  
since 2012–13.  
Health: Instrumental in helping just under 20,000 pregnant women give bir th with a nurse, midwife or doctor since 
2011–12. 

Security and justice: Contributed to over 310,000 women and girls with improved access to security and/or justice services in 2013–14. 


 
Humanitarian: Reached nearly 2 million people with life-saving health and nutrition suppor t through humanitarian funding in 
2012–13. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Amber 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Amber 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Grey 
 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Grey 
Improved water source 
Grey 

## Key Statistics

Population19 
11.3 million 
% living below $1.25 a day 
No data 
Fertility rate 
5.4 
% annual GDP growth rate 
-47.6 
South Sudan programmes 
by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £139.6 million 

## Sudan Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Sudan is a failing state. The country suffers from chronic underdevelopment following cycles of conflict over the last 5 decades. In 2013, the conflicts within Sudan's borders intensified, and early 2014 has seen the worst humanitarian situation in Darfur since the star t of the conflict 10 years ago. At least 6.1 million people are judged to be in need of humanitarian assistance across the country. The recent crisis in South Sudan has also led to an influx of refugees in the southern border states of Sudan. The country is experiencing political stalemate, and the federal government undermines democratic and accountable governance and drives inequality, focusing its spending on Khar toum to the neglect of peripheral states. 

Sudan is off track on the majority of the MDGs. 

## Top Priorities:


- providing protection and life-saving humanitarian support to 
people affected by conflict, while building the resilience of communities to cope with shocks 
 
 
- improving sustainable access to basic services such as water 
and sanitation for the most vulnerable 
- helping vulnerable people to cope with economic instability
, 
such as price increases and cuts to government spending 


 
 
 
- investing in the private sector and civil society
, to lay the 
foundations for a more democratic, peaceful and prosperous future 

## Contribution To The Mdgs


The UK's work in Sudan is supporting progress in these areas, with a cross-cutting focus on women and girls, and their potential as drivers for change. DFID's humanitarian programmes address immediate needs including food and shelter
, access to nutrition and health. DFID 
is also improving access to water and sanitation facilities and helping communities to build their ability to cope when a shock has happened, such as conflict or a natural disaster
. All of these contribute to improving the livelihoods of Sudan's most vulnerable. DFID's economic programmes aim to mitigate the impacts of the economic adjustment process on the poor and DFID is testing approaches to working with the private sector
. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Drinking water: 910,000 people have obtained access to 
(sustainable) clean drinking water between 2011 and 2014. 

Sanitation: 400,000 people have obtained access to an improved sanitation facility between 2011 and 2014. 

Security and justice: 350,000 people have been suppor ted to have choice and control over their own development and hold decision makers to account between 2011 and 2014. 

Humanitarian: 220,000 people reached by health and nutrition-related programmes in 2013–14. 

Humanitarian: 660,000 people reached with food security and livelihoods assistance in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Grey 
 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Grey 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Red 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
35.7 million 
19.8 
% living below $1.25 a day (2009) Fertility rate 
4.8 
% annual GDP growth rate 
-10.1 
Sudan programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £48.0 million 

## Tajikistan Country Summary

Tajikistan is the poorest country in the central Asia region (GDP per capita is $872) and is politically and economically fragile. It has made steady progress since the end of the civil war in 1998: the national pover ty rate has improved from over 
80% to 46.7% today (HDR 2013). These gains are, however, at risk: economic growth and pover ty reduction have been driven by migrant workers in Russia, who contributed 47% of GDP in 2012. The Russian economy is, however, slowing and labour oppor tunities and remittances are unlikely to be sustained at current levels. The small private sector is not creating adequate revenues or job oppor tunities to offset the relative decline in remittances. Tajikistan is unlikely to achieve the 9% growth rate needed to keep pace with the burgeoning population. Health and education provision is deteriorating. Pover ty is increasing. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- promote economic growth and wealth creation, through 
regulatory reform and direct suppor 
t to the private sector 
 
- suppor 
ting transparent and efficient management of public 
finances and improved government accountability 
 
- promoting regional co-operation and trade to stimulate growth 
and co-operation 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

DFID's programmes in Tajikistan focus on promoting economic growth and good governance. To stimulate the private sector and create jobs, DFID provides suppor t to develop an improved regulatory and legal environment for business and to strengthen corporate governance. Complementary programmes provide business advice and access to credit for small and medium sized enterprises. Investment in public finance management will deliver more efficient budgetary allocations and expenditure, in line with development priorities. Suppor t to civil society helps to better hold government to account. A major regional programme helps migrant labourers and their families secure maximum benefits from labour migration. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: In 2013–14 16,000 new clients, of whom 
6,000 were female, were provided with access to finance (individual entrepreneurs and small and medium sized businesses). 

Wealth creation: Since 2010 in total 76,882 migrants have been provided with specific advice (legal, health and social protection) in Information Centres financed from DFID's Regional Migration programme.  
Governance and security: The new Unified Char t of Accounts introduced in 2014 provides improved budget management, analysis, planning, transparency and scrutiny. 

Wealth creation: In 2013–14 the monthly average turnover of  
cross-border markets reached €501,000 after DFID suppor t.  
Wealth creation: Reduced government regulations and  
improved private sector management generated efficiency savings of £7 million in 2013–14 through DFID suppor t.  

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Amber 
Key statistics 
Population 
7.6 million 
6.6 
% living below $1.25 a day (2009) 
Fertility rate 
3.7 
% annual GDP growth rate 
7.5 
Tajikistan programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £8.8 million 

## Tanzania Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Tanzania is politically stable, and is looking ahead to its fifth multi-par ty election in 2015. The country has experienced more than 10 years of 6–7% growth, and made strong progress in access to basic ser vices. However, 30 million people (over two thirds of the population) live below $1.25 a day. If Tanzania is to achieve its goal of reaching middle income status by 2025, it needs to fur ther accelerate its growth rate while also shifting to more equitable broad-based growth to ensure it also delivers a reduction in pover ty. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- scaling up wealth creation programmes to suppor 
t a shift to a 
greater economic development focus in DFID's programme 
 
- delivering the MDGs and improving the effectiveness, quality 
and equity of service delivery in water, education and health 
 
- getting government to work better and helping Tanzanians 
hold their government to account 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Tanzania's progress towards the MDGs is mixed. Under its 2011–15 Operational Plan, DFID provides support through and alongside the government to help Tanzania meet the MDGs particularly in relation to access to water
, education, malaria, maternal health and reducing rural poverty
. Almost all of DFID's headline results directly target the MDGs and good progress has been made in the past year
. The Government of Tanzania's new Big Results Now programme, which DFID is supporting, has also put in place ambitious plans to significantly increase results delivery by 2016 in its initial 6 priority areas: education, water
, agriculture, energy
, transport and resource mobilisation. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Since 2011 DFID has helped over 180,000 
rural men and women to raise their incomes. 

Wealth creation: Since 2011 over 100,000 people have gained access to financial services as a result of DFID suppor t. 

Water and sanitation: Data for 2012–13 shows that 1.4 million rural people were given new access to an improved water source as a result of DFID's programme. 

Education: In 2013–14 DFID suppor ted an estimated 290,000 
children in primary and lower secondary school. 

Health: Since 2011, DFID's health programme has provided essential maternal health drugs for the entire country and yielded 1.6 million couple years of protection for Tanzanian women, giving them a choice over pregnancy. 

Health: Since 2011 DFID has suppor ted the distribution of 
2.8 million bed nets to protect against malaria. 

Climate change: In 2013–14 we assisted over 130,000 people directly and 17.7 million people indirectly to be better able to cope with the effects of climate change. 

Governance: In 2012–13 over 5 million people were suppor ted to have choice and control over their own development and to hold decision makers to account. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Amber 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Amber 
Improved water source 
Red 

## Key Statistics

Population 
45.0 million 
67.9 
% living below $1.25 a day (2007) Fertility rate 
5.6 


% annual GDP growth rate 
6.9 

 
Poverty, hunger and vulnerability 0.8% Reproductive, maternal and newborn health 4.3% 
Water and sanitation 5.4% 
Wealth creation 21.0% 

## Uganda Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Over the last 20 years, Uganda has achieved one of the most dramatic reductions in the income pover ty headcount of any country in Africa - from 70% living on less than $1.25 a day in 1992 to 38% in 2009. Economic growth was approximately 6% in 2013–14, and planned public sector infrastructure investment is expected to boost growth fur ther to 6.5% in 2014–15. Uganda's debt continues to be sustainable; however, its revenue to GDP ratio (estimated at 13.7% for 2013–14) remains the lowest in east Africa. Despite high headline growth rates over the last 2 decades, much of this growth has not translated into adequate employment through decent jobs. With high population growth, levels of youth unemployment are increasing. Uganda's policy framework for social ser vices is strong. It prioritises equitable access to quality social services; however, policies are often not well implemented. Governance trends are concerning and corruption is endemic. In 2013, the UK decided to indefinitely suspend budget suppor t to the Government of Uganda following the 2012 corruption scandal in the office of the Prime Minister. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- promoting good governance and combating corruption 
 
- improving maternal and reproductive health 
 
- suppor 
ting economic development and growth including 
youth skills and job creation 
 
- increasing access to financial services and regional trade 
 
- protecting the poorest and most vulnerable 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Uganda is making good progress towards a number of the MDGs and is on course to meet targets on: proportion of the population living on less than $1.25 a day; ratio of girls to boys in primary education; under 5 mor tality rate; and increased access to drinking water. DFID is suppor ting progress where Uganda is currently off track, eg on reproductive health, HIV 
prevalence and malaria. DFID is making a very significant contribution to the national effor t to increase access to family planning ser vices. The UK is also playing a lead role in suppor ting the country's effor ts to provide social protection for the most vulnerable people. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Health: Since 2011, nearly 390,000 women using modern contraception through DFID suppor t. 

Health: Nearly 20,000 bir ths attended by a skilled healthcare provider in 2013–14 through DFID suppor t. 

Wealth creation: In 2013–14,110,000 men and women accessing financial services through DFID suppor t. 

Poverty reduction: In 2013–14, 450,000 of the most vulnerable people in the country benefited from DFID-suppor ted unconditional monthly cash transfers. 

Education: Since 2011, almost 15,000 primary school children who had dropped out now returning to school through DFID suppor t. 

Vulnerability: In 2013–14, 27 million hours were worked on public works projects in Karamoja. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Green 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Green 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Red 
HIV prevalence, 15–49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Green 
Key statistics 
Population 
34.0 million 
38.0 
% living below $1.25 a day (2009) Fertility rate 
6.4 
% annual GDP growth rate 
6.0 
Uganda programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £94.7 million 

newborn health 11.4%  

## Yemen Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Yemen faces multiple development challenges compounded by serious political crisis and conflict in 2011. Even before the crisis Yemen was the poorest country in the Middle East with worrying human development indicators and rapid population growth. The crisis led to large scale internal displacement and hunger, with 60% of the population needing humanitarian assistance. Ten million Yemenis do not have enough to eat and 1 million young children suffer from acute malnutrition. Women and girls suffer severe discrimination. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- more stable, secure and prosperous Yemen 
 
- political transition 
 
- early recovery and humanitarian needs 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

Although Yemen is on track to meet maternal mor tality ratio and HIV prevalence targets, most MDGs are not expected to be achieved by 2015. Yemen was unlikely to achieve most of the MDGs even before the 2011 humanitarian and economic crisis, which has fur ther inhibited progress. DFID's programme aims to suppor t the political transition: increase economic growth, deliver basic services and social protection, and address humanitarian needs in order to build the foundations for progress towards the MDGs. Through its humanitarian, integrated nutrition and Social Fund for Development programmes, DFID provides access to schools, nutrition, healthcare, clean water and improved sanitation for those most in need in the poorest communities. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Between 2011–12 and 2013–14, just under 
40,000 people were provided with new access to financial services and nearly 6,000 jobs were indirectly created through DFID suppor t. 

 
Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: DFID reached 680,000 
children and women with an integrated package of malnutrition prevention and screening interventions between 2011 and 2013. Just under 40,000 people received DFID suppor ted cash transfers in 2013–14, including through labour intensive public works employment. 

Education: Over 30,000 children were suppor ted by DFID in primary education in 2013–14. 

Water and sanitation: DFID assisted just under 560,000 
people to get sustainable access to clean drinking water sources and 20,000 people to sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility between 2011–12 and 2013–14. 

Humanitarian: DFID reached over 140,000 people with emergency food aid and livelihoods assistance in 2013–14. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Red 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Red 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Green 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Red 
Key statistics 
Population 
22.8 million 
17.5 
% living below $1.25 a day 
 
(2005) Fertility rate 
4.9 
% annual GDP growth rate 
6.0 

## Yemen Programmes By Sector 2013–14

Total spend £59.1 million 

## Zambia Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Sixty percent of Zambia's 13.2 million people (2010) live in pover ty. Inequality is very high and on current trends it will take until 2073 to reduce pover ty to 15%. Weak transmission of Zambia's strong growth to pover ty is the central challenge. 

DFID's programme includes improving the Government of Zambia's policies, systems and skills, enabling Zambia to increase its tax take and use its resources to deliver better ser vices. DFID also works to directly address the most off track MDGs, including extreme pover ty, gender, maternal mor tality, sanitation and hygiene. DFID is also developing a programme to remove the barriers to wealth creation and investment, to create a sustainable future beyond aid. DFID is working with the government and other donors to empower girls and women, in order to make growth more inclusive and tackle inequality. DFID is replacing general budget suppor t with sector budget suppor t for education and targeted financial aid. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- addressing the most off track MDGs 
 
- removing barriers to economic development 
 
- improving the position of poor women and girls 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

DFID is working to directly address the most off track MDGs using a combination of cash transfers, maternal and child mor tality interventions, and programmes to improve sanitation and hygiene. DFID is training community health assistants and skilled bir th attendants to boost health centre capacity, helping to reduce vulnerability to HIV infection and malaria and increasing access to safe delivery and family planning. DFID nutrition inter ventions have reached over 1.9 million children under 5 (2011–13). DFID is increasing access to improved sanitation and improving hygiene practices. DFID is also working with government and other donors to reduce gender based violence and empower girls and women, to tackle inequality and make growth more inclusive. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Poverty: In 2013–14 DFID provided 40,000 recipients with social cash transfers: 82% of recipients are women, and the cash transfers benefited 180,000 family members. DFID's analysis of the programme's success influenced the Government of Zambia to commit to a 700% increase in their financial contribution to the programme. 

Health: DFID delivered a fur ther 1 million bed nets house to house (2013–14), and 3.2 million people now sleep under nets provided by DFID (2011–13). This includes 140,000 pregnant women and 600,000 children under 5 years of age. 

Inclusive growth: In 2013–14 DFID provided 30,000 people and small businesses with access to a new financial product. 

Sanitation and hygiene: Up to 2013–14 inclusive, DFID  
provided 800,000 people with access to improved sanitation and 3.3 million were provided with access to hygiene knowledge through DFID promotion.  

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Red 
 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Green 
 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Green 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Amber 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Amber 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Green 
Improved water source 
Amber 

## Key Statistics

Population 
13.2 million 
74.5 
% living below $1.25 a day (2010) Fertility rate 
5.9 
% annual GDP growth rate 
7.3 
Zambia programmes by sector 2013–14 
Total spend £66.6 million 

## Zimbabwe Country Summary And Top Priorities In 2013–14

Zimbabwe made exemplary progress towards the MDG 
indicators throughout the 1980s and into the 1990s. The economic and humanitarian crisis from 2000 to 2008 stalled and in some cases starkly reversed many of these gains. Since 2009 Zimbabwe's economy has recovered but that recovery is now looking increasingly fragile. 

## Top Priorities:

 
- promoting economic development 
 
- suppor 
t the provision of basic ser 
vices including access to 
health, education and water 
 
- help to strengthen democracy 

## Contribution To The Mdgs

With progress towards the MDGs lagging in Zimbabwe, DFID's programme is focused on strengthening access to basic services including health, education and water. DFID is increasing contraception provision for women to reduce unmet need for family planning and decrease maternal mor tality. 

Through the rehabilitation and drilling of new boreholes DFID is increasing access to clean water in rural areas while our education programme is focused on increasing the number of children, especially girls, who have access to a good quality education. The UK is also playing a leading role in improving household incomes through access to finance, enterprise suppor t and social protection to vulnerable households. DFID's work is also improving food security in rural areas. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Cash transfers: 165,000 people received cash benefits in 
2013–14. 

Education: 118,000 children suppor ted to attend primary school in 2013–14. 

Health: 126,000 babies have been delivered with the help of a nurse, midwife or doctor since 2011–12. Almost 3.5 million couples were provided with a year's contraceptive protection in 2013–14 through DFID's family planning programme. 

Water and sanitation: 790,000 people have achieved access to better hygiene over the last 2 years. 290,000 people have acquired sustainable access to clean drinking water over the last 2 years. 

Wealth creation: Nearly 90,000 economic oppor tunities created since 2012–13. 

## Progress Towards The Mdgs

MDG 
indicator 
Current 
assessment 
Proportion of population 
below $1.25 a day 
Grey 
Net enrolment in primary education 
Grey 
Ratio of girls to boys in primary education 
Grey 
Under 5 mortality ratio 
Red 
Maternal mortality ratio 
Red 
HIV prevalence, 15– 
49 
years old 
Red 
Improved water source 
Red 
Key statistics 
Population 
13.0 million 
 
% living below $1.25 a day 
No data 
Fertility rate 
3.9 
% annual GDP growth rate 
3.0 

## Zimbabwe Programmes By Sector 2013–14

Total spend £106.0 million 

 
Poverty, hunger and vulnerability 7.9% Reproductive, maternal and newborn health 19.7%  
Water and sanitation 10.3%  
Wealth creation 3.3%  

## Africa Regional Programme

Africa needs rapid economic growth and conducive policies to reduce pover ty. Of the 911 million people in sub-Saharan Africa, 48% still live on less than $1.25 a day. Some 29% live in landlocked countries, relying on their neighbours for access to overseas markets and growth oppor tunities. These continuing challenges cannot be overcome through working at the country level alone. Regional co-operation is essential to join up African economies and improve trade between them and the world, facilitate efficient management of natural resources, and respond to climate change challenges. Regional approaches are also impor tant for addressing neglected or sensitive development issues and improving lesson learning across countries. 

Contribution to regional priorities The Africa Regional Programme works closely with the African Union, Regional Economic Communities, African Development Bank, African governments and other par tners to help meet a range of regional development objectives. DFID supports regional interventions promoting: wealth creation by reducing trade barriers, suppor ting regional infrastructure development, and increasing par ticipation in regional staple food markets; adaptation to climate change, including improved regional co-operation on forests and water management; strengthened governance and accountability; improved regional evidence and advocacy, par ticularly on maternal health, malaria and democratic governance; and addressing neglected health issues such as unsafe abor tion and female genital mutilation. Helping Africa to make the most of its extractive industries is an impor tant new priority.

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Construction of one additional one-stop border post completed since 2011–12. The  
reduction in crossing time will be measured in 2015.  
Wealth creation: 880,000 people benefiting directly from new or improved par ticipation in national and crossborder value chains (eg regional food markets) since 2011–12.  
Health: 530,000 unsafe abor tions aver ted since 2011–12.  
Climate change: 710,000 people benefiting from improved management of shared water basins since 2011–12. Climate change: 140,000 people with improved access to low carbon energy since 2011–12. Governance: 460,000 people suppor ted to have choice and control over their own development and to hold  
decision makers to account since 2011–12.  
Humanitarian: 2.3 million people reached with emergency food assistance since 2011–12.  

## Asia Regional Programme

South Asia is home to 500 million people living below $1.25/day and 900 million living below $2/day
. The region has the worst level of gender inequality in the world, including high levels of violence against girls and women, and the lowest rates of economic participation. The region's poorest people are those discriminated against because of their gender, caste, religion or ethnicity
. The entire region is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. More than 750 million people (50% of the population in the Asia region) have been affected by at least one natural disaster over a period of less than 20 years, resulting in 230,000 deaths and $45 billion in damage. Intra -regional trade, at 5% of total trade, is also among the lowest in the world.

Contribution to regional priorities The Asia regional programme allows DFID to work across borders and in ways which can be more cost effective than working in individual countries. Priorities include: improving regional connectivity with a focus on trade and power connectivity, and dealing with the negative consequences of improved trade (trafficking and malaria); improving resilience to growth including through co-operation on cross-border rivers and protecting the urban poor from climate risks; and (where appropriate) running regional health and nutrition programmes including programmes that will enable more effective food security and nutrition investments in the region. 

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: Support through the South Asia Regional Trade and Integration Project has delivered an agreed new World Bank funded programme to connect electricity produced in central Asia from hydro sources to Pakistan. In 2013–14 these programmes also helped to reduce transit times of goods at key border posts (Nepal/India and Pakistan/India in particular), and identified cross-border investment opportunities to stimulate job creation.

Governance and security: During 2013–14, foundations for the 'Work in Freedom' anti-trafficking programme have been laid, including 8 partnership agreements signed, delivery teams recruited, and several pilot community activities and border surveys completed.  
Poverty, hunger and vulnerability: Through the South Asia Food and Nutrition Security Initiative 16 
programmes in different sectors are improving food security and nutrition. 

Health: Between 2011–12 and 2013–14 the multi-country maternal health programme has averted over 5,000 
maternal deaths (modelled). 

Managing climate risks: By the end of 2013–14 the South Asia Water Governance programme had helped facilitate the signing of agreements between China, India and Nepal to co-operate on securing the waters of the Indus and Brahmaputra rivers.  

## Middle East And North Africa Regional Programmes

The main purpose of DFID's involvement in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is to support a more stable and prosperous region based on open, inclusive political systems and economies. MENAD Regional delivers programming across the region, with a specific focus on countries in transition and experiencing instability (Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Lebanon and Libya). MENAD Regional also supports cooperation and dialogue with the Gulf donors in UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar
. 

DFID's work is focused on the £125 million Arab Partnership Economic Facility which aims to support increased employment (especially for women and young people), economic growth, and effective and accountable institutions. The majority of funding is being channelled through the international financial institutions to provide technical assistance to governments and the private sector
. 

In 2013–14 DFID played a major role in responding to the humanitarian crisis caused by the ongoing conflict in Syria. DFID contributed £295 million to support those affected by the conflict in Syria and neighbouring countries. MENAD Regional complements DFID's humanitarian response with additional support to host communities in Jordan and Lebanon. UK support in Libya is helping the government to deliver security and justice services and improve its management of public finances.

Contribution to regional priorities Since 2011, the MENA region has experienced major changes. The region today faces complex, interlinked political, economic and security challenges, and a large and still growing youth population. DFID's work in the region is a major component of a wider UK government effort to respond to the challenges of short term insecurity while laying the foundations for long term stability and reform.

## Delivery Of Dfid Headline Results

Wealth creation: During 2013–14 over 1,300 enterprises have received business advice. Nearly 1,700 loans have been disbursed to small and medium sized enterprises. 19,500 jobs have been created either directly or indirectly. 2,900 people have been trained in new skills. 150,000 micro-loans have been disbursed to new businesses.

Global partnerships: During 2013–14 54% of projects by the World Bank and 39% of projects by the African Development Bank in the MENA region were focused on promoting economic and social inclusion. Since its launch in 2012 the Deauville Transition Fund has so far committed $100 million to a total of 28 projects across Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Morocco, Yemen and Libya.

Humanitarian: In Syria and the wider region approximately half a million people per month have been supported with food aid and up to 600,000 people per month have been provided with clean drinking water.

## Overseas Territories

3.15  A White Paper on the Overseas Territories was published in June 2012. This set out an ambitious 
vision for the 14 UK Overseas Territories of flourishing communities, growing economies, soundly managed public finances, and strong technical suppor 
t for development of the Territories provided 
from a wide range of Whitehall depar 
tments. 
3.16  DFID's Overseas Territories Depar 
tment's Operational Plan set out how DFID works to achieve these 
objectives - by meeting the reasonable assistance needs of the 3 'aided' Overseas Territories, accelerating reduction in their aid dependency, and helping manage the government's financial liabilities for non-aided Caribbean Overseas Territories in crisis. 
3.17  DFID's direct financial suppor 
t for the governments of Montserrat, St Helena and Pitcairn again 
helped to ensure the delivery of adequate public ser 
vices such as health, education and continued 
access to the islands by sea. DFID also continued to provide investment in Overseas Territories where the conditions are right for substantial public investments to help stimulate private sector led economic growth. In the past year this has led to impor 
tant progress, including: 
- St Helena, where the ear 
thworks for the new airpor 
t are now two thirds complete. The airpor 
t is on 
schedule to open in early 2016. Preparatory work has also begun on the construction of a new wharf which will allow cargo vessels to dock directly on the island for the first time. 
- Initial geothermal testing on Montserrat has been completed, allowing work to begin on the design 
of a power plant and the transmission line which will feed the electricity generated by geothermal power into the island's grid. Geothermal power offers the prospect of cheaper and cleaner energy for Montserrat. It is designed to help attract new businesses to the island, generate revenues for the Montserrat Government and lead to a gradual reduction in the need for UK financial assistance. 
- 
 In the Turks and Caicos Islands, a UK government loan guarantee of a $239 million continues to 
save the Turks and Caicos Islands millions of dollars a year. During 2013, technical assistance from DFID helped ensure that the Turks and Caicos Islands Government stayed on track to refinance at a low and sustainable debt level when the current guarantee expires in 2016. 
3.18  In return for these major investments from DFID, Overseas Territories governments are committed to 
doing everything they can to improve the investment climate and to reduce their dependence on UK subsidies. 

## Delivering Through Multilateral Organisations

4.1  
The following pages in this chapter offer a repor 
t on the mulitlateral organisations covered by the 
Multilateral Aid Review (MAR)1 in receipt of at least £20 million per year.2 Each repor 
t includes: a 
summary of what the organisation does, including how it contributes to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); DFID funding to the organisation; what the organisation spends in each sector; the organisation's main achievements; and the MAR assessment score (2011) and the rating from the 
MAR Update3  (2013). 
4.2  
Examples of key achievements by the other multilaterals covered in the MAR are outlined at the end of the chapter in Table 4.1. Some information on administrative costs is included though it should be noted that the classification and repor 
ting of administrative costs varies across multilaterals and over 
time within multilaterals. This makes it difficult to compare administrative spend across organisations, and also makes tracking cost changes over time difficult. DFID is working with par 
tners and 
organisations to increase the transparency and usefulness of administrative cost data by agreeing a common approach and repor 
ting method. 
4.3  
The UK wants to make sure that funding to multilaterals has the greatest possible impact on the lives of the poorest people in the world. That is why, in 2011, the Coalition Government established the Multilateral Aid Review to assess the value for money of DFID's central funding of 43 different multilateral organisations. The review influenced spending decisions and was recognised by the UK Parliamentary International Development Committee as making "a real contribution to the efficiency of the multilateral system". 
4.4  
In 2013, DFID under 
took an Update of the MAR to assess progress on specific reform priorities. The 
Update showed that all the organisations it continued to fund have made improvements over 2 years. Some organisations were asked to make urgent reforms if they wanted investment to continue (known as 'special measures agencies') - and they have all made progress. Other multilaterals, which were already doing well, are doing even better. However, not all organisations have made the changes 
DFID expected of them. This was the case in areas such as the empowerment of girls and women, 
driving greater transparency and accountability, and paying sufficient attention to costs and ensuring value for money and the appropriate level of administration costs. Work continues to suppor 
t 
improvements in these areas. 
4.5  
DFID delivered 45% of its total programme expenditure in 2013–14 through central funding to 
multilateral organisations (£4.4 billion4 out of a total programme spend of £9.9 billion). Provisional 
figures5 show that in 2013–14 DFID's main multilateral delivery par 
tners were the European 
Commission, International Financial Institutions (IFIs, including the World Bank and the African and Asian Development Banks), the Global Funds (including the GAVI Alliance, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and UNITAID) and the United Nations and Commonwealth. Figure 4.1 shows the distribution of DFID's core funding across these organisations. 
4.6  
Alongside core funding, DFID also provides non-core funding to multilateral organisations to deliver specific programmes, usually within a par 
ticular country or region, or within a cer 
tain theme such as 
sanitation or education. Information on both core and non-core funding is shown in each of the one-page summaries on selected multilaterals later in this chapter. 
4.7  
Multilateral organisations make a critically impor 
tant contribution to achieving international 
development and humanitarian objectives globally, including in countries where DFID has no bilateral presence. As shown in Figure 4.2, the majority of funding from multilaterals goes to Africa and Asia. 
4.8 
Throughout this chapter the following colour coding is used to indicate which MDGs the multilateral contributes towards, and to what degree. 
The lighter shade shows that a multilateral contributes to this MDG 
The darker shade shows where work towards this MDG is a significant part of the multilateral's work No shading indicates that the multilateral has no par ticular focus on this MDG indicator 

## 4.9 The Scores Used In The Mar And The Mar Update Are Shown Below.

| MAR (2011) summary                                                          | Basis for rating    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| 4                                                                           |                     |
| Very good value for money for UK aid                                        |                     |
| 3                                                                           |                     |
| Good value for money for UK aid                                             |                     |
| 2                                                                           |                     |
| Adequate value for money for UK aid                                         |                     |
| 1                                                                           |                     |
| Poor value for money for UK aid                                             |                     |
| Basis for rating                                                            | MAR Update overall  |
| progress rating                                                             |                     |
| Significant progress in all components OR significant progress in most      |                     |
| components outweighs reasonable, some or no progress in others              |                     |
| 4                                                                           |                     |
| 3                                                                           |                     |
| Reasonable progress in all components OR reasonable progress in most        |                     |
| components outweighs some and no progress in others OR significant progress |                     |
| in some components balances some and no progress in others                  |                     |
| Some progress in all or most components OR reasonable progress in some      |                     |
| components balances no progress in others                                   |                     |
| 2                                                                           |                     |
| Little or no progress in most components not balanced by significant,       |                     |
| reasonable or some progress elsewhere                                       |                     |
| 1                                                                           |                     |

## African Development Bank

Multilateral summary The African Development Bank (AfDB) group is owned 
 
and funded by its member countries and provides loans 
 
and grants to African governments and private companies 
 
investing in Africa's regional member countries. The African Development Fund (AfDF) is the 
 
concessional lending arm of the AfDB. 

 
The AfDB is committed to reducing pover ty and 
 
promoting sustainable economic and social 
 
development in Africa. In 2014, donor countries, including the UK, agreed 
 
to contribute approximately $7.3 billion to the 
 
concessional fund between 2014 and 2016. This 
 
money has provided loans and grants to 40 of the 
 
poorest African countries. Priority areas for the AfDB are: inclusive growth/ transition to sustainable growth, infrastructure 
 
development, regional integration, private sector 
 
development with special emphasis given to fragile 
 
states, agriculture and food security, and gender
. 

Contribution to the MDGs The AfDB is involved in all 8 MDGs at various levels, par ticularly the reduction of extreme pover ty and hunger
. The Bank also focuses on improving the enabling conditions for sustainable growth, including infrastructure and private sector development. 

Key achievements In 2013, as a result of AfDB's suppor t 

-  921,000 people have gained access to new or 
improved water and sanitation 
-  2.6 million people have new or improved electricity 
connection 
-  over 7.2 million people have improved access to 
transport connections 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 


3 
Good value for money for UK aid The UK has around a 1.7% shareholding in the AfDB (the seventh largest non-regional shareholder and 17th largest overall). The UK delegation to the Bank sits within a constituency office comprising of Italy
, the Netherlands and the UK. The UK currently holds the Executive Director position in this constituency
. 

Funding to AfDB 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£595 million to AfDB, 94% 
 
of which was core funding 
 
including for the Multilateral 
 
Debt Relief Initiatives 
 
(MDRI). DFID provided 
 
£205 million to AfDB in 2013–14, 98% of which was core funding. 

 
AfDB spend by sector In 2013, the AfDB group approved 202 operations totalling Unit of Account1 (UA) 4.4 billion, with an administrative cost level of 7%. Total approvals for loans and grants amounted to UA 2.3 billion. 

## Afdb Approvals, 2013


## Asian Development Bank

Multilateral summary The Asian Development Bank (AsDB) is owned and funded by its member countries and provides loans and grants to governments and private companies investing in its regional member countries in Asia and the Pacific. AsDB is committed to tackling pover ty reduction  
and delivering the MDGs through the promotion of inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. AsDB has a strong focus on infrastructure (transpor t, energy, water and sanitation) and works closely with par tner countries, other multilaterals including the World Bank, and bilateral donors including the UK. The Asian Development Fund (AsDF) is the concessional lending arm of the AsDB. In 2013, donor countries, including the UK, agreed to contribute approximately $4.6 billion between 2013 and 2016. This money will provide loans and grants to the 30 least developed of its 48 regional members. 

AsDB spend by sector In 2013, AsDB approved operations totalling $21.0 billion, with an administrative cost level of 4% of total approved operations. In 2013, $8.5 billion of loans and grants were disbursed. 

Contribution to the MDGs AsDB contributes to the MDGs through its focus on pover ty reduction and investment in core MDG sectors such as transpor t, energy, water
, financial services and education. It also suppor ts the collection of statistics to monitor progress towards achieving the MDGs in Asia and the Pacific. 

Key achievements 
-  AsDB assistance in 2013 enabled 92,000 
households to get connected to electricity, 
1,003,000 to a water supply and 549,000 to sanitation. AsDB also provided microfinance loans to 831,000 borrowers, mostly to women 
-  AsDB provided nearly $900 million in assistance 
for immediate recovery effor 
ts and long term 
reconstruction and rehabilitation following Typhoon Haiyan which struck the Philippines with devastating effect on 8 November 2013 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
4 
Very good value for money for UK aid The UK has around a 2% shareholding in the AsDB (the 7th largest non-regional shareholder and 14th largest overall). The UK delegation to the Bank sits within a constituency office comprising Austria, Germany
, Luxembourg and Turkey
. The UK currently holds the Alternate Executive Director position in this constituency
. 



Funding to the AsDB 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£171 million to AsDB, 68% of which was core funding. DFID provided £74 million to AsDB in 2013–14, 80% 
 
of which was core funding. 

## Asdb Loans And Grants, 2013

Water supply and other municipal infrastructure and services 9.1% Multisector 8%  
Public sector management 5.7%  
Agriculture and natural resources 5%  
Education 3.7%  
Health and social protection 2.6% Industry and trade 0.3%  

## Central Emergency Response Fund

Multilateral summary The Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) aims to provide timely and flexible humanitarian funding in the immediate aftermath of rapid onset disasters, and reduces critical gaps in chronically under­ funded emergencies. 

Contribution to the MDGs Humanitarian assistance is often a major source of suppor t for pover ty reduction in chronically poor
, fragile and conflict-affected countries where progress on the MDGs has been slowest. It can help vulnerable communities reduce vulnerability to crisis, protect their assets during shocks and prevent them from falling into deeper pover ty
. 

## Key Achievements In 2013, Cerf Provided:

-  $47.4 million to help people in Sudan affected 
by heavy rains and flooding. Allocations include distributions of water and sanitation, lifesaving ser 
vices for the displaced population,  
health and food 
-  $40.4 million for operations in Syria to suppor 
t up 
to 4 million people (including 2 million children), including distribution of food and non-food items, and water and sanitation 
-  $74.5 million to fund humanitarian operations in 
13 countries. Allocations include $19.8 million to Somalia to suppor 
t relief work in poorly 
funded clusters including food security, nutrition, protection and health, and $10 million to Pakistan for emergency lifesaving nutrition services and emergency shelter 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 
4 
Very good value for money for UK aid DFID engages with CERF through CERF's Advisory Group (CAG). This is a useful forum to press for the limited number of reforms DFID expects CERF to address and to ensure good progress continues. 

Multilateral Aid Review 2013 

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 
 
£141 million to CERF DFID provided 
  
£70 million to CERF in 2013–14. 



CERF spend by sector In 2013, CERF's total expenditure was $482 million, with 
10% as administrative costs. Administrative costs are arrived at by aggregating the programme suppor t costs of both implementing par tners and the UN. 

## Cerf Disbursement Of Funds, 2013

rule of law 5.1%  
UN Humanitarian Air Service 2.7%  
Camp management 2.4%  
Logistics 1.3% Education 1.1% Mine action 0.7% Telecom and data 0.6% Security 0.4% Economic recovery and infrastructure 0.3%  


## Climate Investment Funds



Multilateral summary The Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) are trust funds which aim to deliver large scale finance in the form of grants and loans to suppor t developing countries' own plans for low carbon, climate resilient development. Funds are delivered through the multilateral development banks. The CIFs enable developing countries to pilot new, 
 
innovative and transformational approaches at scale, 
 
and they are increasingly leveraging private finance.  
 
Currently 48 developing countries are benefiting 
 
Funding to CIFs Between 2010–11 and 
 
from CIF suppor t. Approximately $8 billion has been 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
pledged to the CIFs by 14 donor countries and over 
 
£391 million to CIFs. DFID 
 
50 developing countries are involved as equal par tners 
 
provided £13 million to 
 
in decision making or as recipients of finance. 

 
CIFs in 2013–14. 

-  $839 million for the Clean Technology Fund, of which 
$10.5 million (1%) was administrative costs 


Contribution to the MDGs By advancing low carbon and climate resilient development, the CIFs are combating the effects of climate change across many sectors, and thus reducing the threat of the attainment of the MDGs. 

-  $520 million for the Strategic Climate Fund (covering 
the Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience, the Forest Investment Programme and the Scaling Up Renewable Energy Programme), $30.9 million (6%) of which was administrative costs 
Key achievements The CIFs' results are expected to be realised over the long term in a 5 to 30 year period. 


-  in 2013, the CIFs approved 44 projects in 27 
countries (including one regional programme) which will increase renewable energy, transpor 
t and energy 
efficient infrastructure; increase the number of people suppor 
ted to cope with the effects of climate 
change; reduce deforestation and degradation; and increase sustainable land management practices. 


-  2,626 MW of installed renewable energy capacity 
are repor 
ted to have been achieved by early 
implementers. 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Good value for money for UK aid The UK currently has a single seat on all the committees and sub-committees. There are more donors than donor seats and this is managed informally
. The UK successfully ensured that key priorities are reflected in the CIFs, for example securing a strong focus on gender
. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 


CIFs spend by fund In 2013, the total expenditure for each of the two trust funds which make up the CIFs was: 

## European Development Fund

Multilateral summary The European Development Fund (EDF) is the main funding instrument for European Commission (EC) development spending in 78 African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACPs) and 25 European Union (EU) overseas countries and territories. The EDF is a separate Member State fund that sits outside the EU's budget. The EDF has a strong poverty focus with 80% of funds going to low income countries. Its size, focus on poverty and cross-cutting development impact makes the EDF critical for progress on the MDGs and poverty reduction. 

Contribution to the MDGs EU co-operation across the world is focused on achieving the MDGs. The 2011 '
Agenda for Change' policy document reaffirmed that the objective of EU assistance is poverty elimination in the context of sustainable development, including pursuit of all of the MDGs. 

 
 
In December 2011, the EC launched an initiative worth €1 billion for projects targeting the most off-track MDGs, including hunger
, child mortality
, maternal health, and water and sanitation. 


## Key Achievements In 2012:

 

 
-  the EDF invested €233 million in health sector 
projects in 49 countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific 
 
 
-  the European Investment Bank approved operations 
in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific that will help suppor 
t or create 2.4 million jobs 
 
 
-  the EU approved projects that will provide access 
to electricity to more than 2.6 million people across Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 


4 
Very good value for money for UK aid The EDF is a fund managed on behalf of EU Member States by the EC. EDF decisions are taken by a Member State committee, by consensus wherever possible. The UK also uses its position in the Council of the EU to influence EU development policy
. The UK contribution to the EDF is 14.8%, giving an equivalent voting weight. 

Funding to EDF 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided £1,180 million to the EDF all of which was core 
 
funding. DFID provided just over £400 million 
  
to the EDF in 2013–14. 

 
EDF spend by sector In 2012, the EDF disbursed €3.1 billion wor th of official development assistance. 

## Edf Disbursement Of Funds, 2012 European Union Budget, Development And Humanitarian Aid And Civil Protection (Echo) Departments Of The European Commission



Multilateral summary Development investment provided through the European Union (EU) budget funds programmes in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Nor th Africa. It also funds some thematic programmes and the EU's humanitarian assistance, through ECHO. 

EU budget-development spend In 2012, the EU budget-development (excluding the EDF) disbursed €6.5 billion wor th of official development assistance. 



Contribution to the MDGs The 2011 'Agenda for Change' policy document reaffirms that the objective of EU aid is pover ty elimination in the context of sustainable development, including pursuit of all of the MDGs. Humanitarian assistance is currently a major source of suppor t for pover ty reduction in chronically poor
, fragile and conflict-affected countries where progress on the MDGs has been slowest. 

Key achievements 
-  disbursed between 2009 and 2011, the EU's 
€1 billion food facility has improved the lives of over 59 million people in 49 countries through, for example, a livestock vaccination programme that resulted in the inoculation of around 45 million livestock 
 
 
-  in 2012, the European Investment Bank approved 
operations outside the Africa, Caribbean and Pacific regions that will help suppor 
t or create 900,000 jobs 
 
-  in 2013, ECHO's humanitarian assistance reached 
124 million people 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

4 
ECHO Very good value for money for UK aid 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
EU budget Adequate value for money for UK aid The EU budget-development is managed by the EC. Funding is split by regional and thematic lines, with decisions taken by committees for the regional instruments. The UK uses its position in the Council of the EU to influence EU development policy
. The UK is a Member State of the EU and contributed 15.6% of the EU budget in 2013. 

  
 
2 
EU budget Some progress on average across reform 
areas 
2 
ECHO Some progress on average across reform areas 
 

## Funding To Eu Budget-Development And Echo Between 2010–11 And

2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£2.4 billion to the EU 
 
budget-development, 
 
around 99% of which 
 
was core funding. DFID provided approximately 
 
£780 million in 2013–14, 97% of which was core funding. 

## Ec Budget Oda Disbursements, 2012


## Food And Agriculture Organisation

Multilateral summary The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) provides technical assistance and policy advice at country and global level to support increased food production, rural development, and sustainable use of natural resources. FAO provides the platform to negotiate international treaties and agree normative standards and guidelines on food and agriculture issues. It leads the humanitarian agriculture cluster in response to emergency situations, such as floods, droughts and earthquakes.

FAO spend by sector The total FAO budget for the biennium 2012–13 was $2.4 billion, with around 58% provided through voluntary contributions. The largest part of the budget delivered food and agriculture outcomes, with 6% budgeted as administrative costs that include: financial stewardship and reporting, procurement, HR management and facilities management.

Contribution to the MDGs The FAO focuses on MDG1, eradicating extreme hunger and poverty by: supporting sustainable management of natural resources to increase productivity and improve food security
. This includes supporting gender equity in access to resources, goods, services and decision-making in rural areas; building global partnerships, including through monitoring and assessment of long term trends; provision of information, policy advice, knowledge and statistics; and development of international instruments, norms and standards.

Key achievements
- following typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines, FAO 
ensured that affected rice farmers could plant in 
time for the December planting season. The rice production packages provided to 44,000 affected families in 2013 will yield enough to feed more than 800,000 people for more than a year
- in 2013, the FAO supported the enhancement of 
Kenya's National Livestock Disease Surveillance Coverage using new digital pen technology, enabling disease reports to be incorporated into the national database in a matter of seconds instead of a month 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement 1 Poor Value For Money For Uk Aid

Multilateral Aid Review 2013
through DFID's UK Permanent Representation to the UN Agencies in Rome.

## 3  Reasonable Progress On Average Across Reform Areas

Funding to FAO
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £109 million to FAO, 48% of which was core assessed funding. DFID provided £87 million to FAO in 2013–14, 44% of which was core assessed funding. 

The UK is a member of the FAO Conference and Council, and co-ordinates positions with the EU group. Direct engagement with FAO is 

## Gavi Alliance

Multilateral summary The GAVI Alliance is a public-private par tnership which 
 
aims to save children's lives and protect people's health 
 
by increasing access to immunisation in developing 
 
countries. As well as traditional donor contributions, 
 
GAVI has raised additional predictable finance for 
 
immunisation through the International Finance Facility 
 
for Immunisation (IFFIm) and the Advance Market 
 
Commitment (AMC). GAVI currently provides suppor t 
 
to the 73 least developed countries and most fragile 
 
states. Fifty six countries are eligible for new GAVI 
 
suppor t based on their gross national income (GNI) 
 
per capita being below or equal to $1,570. 

 
GAVI spend by sector In 2013, GAVI's total operating expenditure is estimated to be $1.6 billion, including around $49 million (3%) in overhead costs/administrative costs. 



Contribution to the MDGs Immunisation is impor tant for driving MDG progress. 

Vaccines prevent over 2.5 million child deaths each year and protect children from disability, enabling families to break out of a cycle of pover ty and ill health (MDG 1). 

A total of $8.2 billion was committed for programmes between 2000 and 2013. 79% of funds were committed to the procurement of vaccines, which are delivered to country
. 

## Total Gavi Funds Committed, 2013

 
GAVI makes its biggest contribution to MDG 4, reducing child mor tality through suppor t for vaccines against pneumococcal and rotavirus diseases. It has an impact on MDG 5: through suppor t for the vaccine to prevent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) which causes cervical cancer
, a leading killer of women in sub-Saharan Africa. 

## Key Achievements In 2013, Gavi:

-  suppor 
ted the immunisation of over 48 million 
additional children 
-  contributed to preventing more than 900,000 
additional future deaths 
-  reduced the total cost to fully immunise a child with 
pentavalent, pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccines 
by 37% from $35 in 2010 to $22 in 2013 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

4 
Very good value for money for UK aid As par t of the UK/Canada/Ireland donor constituency
, DFID sits directly on the GAVI 
Alliance Board, Governance Committee, Policy and Programme Committee and is represented on the Audit and Finance Committee. The UK provided 32.4% of GAVI funds during 2011–15. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 


Funding to GAVI 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£376 million to GAVI 
 
(including IFFIm and 
 
AMC), 96% of which 
 
was core funding. DFID 
 
provided £387 million 
 
to GAVI in 2013–14, 
 
89% of which was core funding. 


## Global Environment Facility

Multilateral summary The Global Environment Facility (GEF) is the 
 
principal agency suppor ting developing countries in 
 
implementing international agreements on climate 
 
change, biodiversity, land degradation, international 
 
waters, dangerous chemicals and protection of the 
 
ozone layer
. It provides finance for technical suppor t 
 
and training and to meet the incremental costs of 
 
innovative pilot investments that yield global and local 
 
benefits, for example in renewable energy
. GEF finance 
 
is channelled through 10 multilateral banks and UN 
 
agencies. Currently
, 144 countries are eligible for GEF support. 

 
Approximately $4.3 billion was pledged by 35 donors for 
 
the current, fifth replenishment period (GEF5, 2010–14). 

 



Contribution to the MDGs By suppor ting improved environmental management as an integral par t of sustainable development - 
including climate change, biodiversity and drylands management - the GEF programmes strengthen a range of sectors, including agriculture, forestry and energy which are crucial to achieving and sustaining the MDGs. 

 

Key achievements 
UK funding for GEF5 is contributing to the following results: 
-  demonstration of 3 to 4 innovative energy 
technologies in 10 to 15 countries 
-  0.5 gigawatt new renewable energy capacity 
installed 
-  conser 
vation and management of 170 hectares 
of protected areas 
-  sustainable use and management of biodiversity 
in 60 hectares of production landscapes and/or 
seascapes 
-  500 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent avoided 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 
3 
Good value for money for UK aid The UK is a member of the GEF Council, the main governing body for the GEF
. 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
 
Funding to GEF 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£193 million to GEF
, 
  
all of which was core 
 
funding. DFID provided £53 million to GEF in 
 
2013–14. 

 
GEF spend by sector The total GEF5 budget for 2010–14 is $4.3 billion, 3% of which is allocated to corporate activities. 

## Gef5 Indicative Allocation, 2010–2014

Small grants 3.3%  
Sustainable Forest Management/ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation 5.9% 
Outreach to private sector 1.9% 
Corporate budget 2.8% 
 

## Global Fund To Fight Aids, Tuberculosis And Malaria

Multilateral summary The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) is a global public-private par tnership that raises and disburses funds to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB) and malaria. 

 
It has suppor ted over 1,000 programmes, and accounts for 20% of all international funding for HIV/ AIDS, 75% of international TB funding, and 66% of international funding for malaria. 

Contribution to the MDGs Since its creation in 2002, GFATM has become the biggest multilateral funder of health-related MDGs, directly contributing to MDGs 4, 5 and 6. 

 
 
Due to strong country-owned programmes, increased funding and recent scientific advances, the MDG targets for HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria have been achieved. Globally it is estimated that new HIV infections have fallen by 30% between 2001 and 2012; malaria mor tality rates by 42% in all age groups between 2000 
and 2012; and the TB mor tality rate has been reduced by 45% between 1990 and 2012. 

 
Key achievements In 2013 alone, through GFATM suppor ted programmes: 

-  1.9 million people received antiretroviral (ARV) 
therapy 
-  670,000 HIV positive women received ARV 
prophylaxis for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) 
-  1.5 million new TB cases were detected and treated 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

4 
Very good value for money for UK aid As par t of the UK/Australia constituency
, DFID sits on the GFATM Board and will sit on the Strategic Impact and Investment Committee from 2014–15. On average over the 2013–14 period DFID was a 9.4% shareholder
. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
 
Funding to GFATM 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£606 million to GFATM, 
 
almost all of which was 
 
core funding. DFID 
 
provided £543 million 
 
to GFATM in 2013–14, 
  
all of which was core funding. 

GFATM spend by sector In 2012, the total GFATM grant expenditure was $1.2 billion, including around $222 million (18%) in human resources, planning and administrative costs; including employment costs, fund agent fees and operating expenses. A total of $25.1 billion was committed for programmes between 2002 and 2013 and allocated by disaese as follows. 

## Gfatm Programme Approvals, 2002–2013


## Global Partnership For Education

Multilateral summary The Global Par tnership for Education (GPE) is the only multilateral organisation exclusively focused on suppor ting poor countries to educate children from pre-primary to the end of secondary school. 



GPE is comprised of nearly 60 developing countries, as well as donor governments, the private sector, civil society, teachers, and multilateral organisations Contribution to the MDGs GPE directly contributes to MDGs 2 and 3, and indirectly suppor ts others. Half the reduction in child mor tality over the past 40 years can be attributed to better education of women, and about 171 million people could be lifted out of pover ty if all students in poor countries left school with basic reading skills. 



GPE suppor ts this by financing the development and implementation of countries' education sector plans through a co-ordinated process involving donors, developing countries, civil society and teacher representatives. 

Key achievements 
-  in 2012, GPE suppor 
ted over 4.5 million children  
in primary education, including 2.2 million girls 
-  in 2012, GPE suppor 
ted over 400,000 children  
in lower secondary school, including approximately 189,000 girls 
-  joining the Par 
tnership is associated with an 
average 12% increase in primary completion rate for developing countries and a 10% increase in domestic financing 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 


4 
Very good value for money for UK aid DFID shares a Board constituency with Canada and holds the Board seat. In addition it sits on the Country Grants and Performance Committee and the Co-ordinating Committee, and Canada represents us on the Governance and Finance Committee. Since inception, DFID has contributed around 23% of GPE's funding. 

Funding to GPE 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided £248 million to GPE, all of which was core funding. DFID provided £60 million to GPE in 2013–14, all of which was core funding. 



GPE spend by country All programme funding to GPE suppor ts education. In 2013, spending on programme implementation grants totalled $335 million. Administrative costs were $16 million in 2013 
(5% of programme disbursements). 

## Gpe Programme Implementation Grants By Countries, 2013 International Committee Of The Red Cross

Multilateral summary The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an independent, neutral organisation that directs and co-ordinates the international relief activities of the Red Cross and Red Crescent during armed conflicts. It works in some of the most difficult and fragile conflict environments in the world, providing protection and assistance to those affected. 

Contribution to the MDGs ICRC's primary objective is to save lives and protect the dignity of victims of armed conflict. ICRC contributes to the MDGs and pover ty reduction through its focus on providing humanitarian assistance in conflict countries. 



ICRC spend by sector In 2013, ICRC's total expenditure was Swiss Francs (CHF) 1,234 million, with 10% as administrative costs. The total operational activities amounted to CHF1,045 million, with most spent on assistance. 

Humanitarian assistance is often a major source of suppor t for pover ty reduction in chronically poor
, fragile and conflict-affected countries where progress on the MDGs has been slowest. It can help communities reduce their vulnerability to crisis, protect their assets during shocks and prevent them from falling into deeper pover ty
. 

## Key Achievements In 2013, Icrc:

 
-  improved water, sanitation and construction work 
in 58 countries, helping some 28.7 million people worldwide 
-  provided food aid to 6.8 million people in  
55 countries worldwide 
-  enabled 11.5 million people to benefit from  
ICRC-suppor 
ted healthcare facilities 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 


4 
Very good value for money for UK aid The UK is an active member of the Donor Suppor t Group (DSG) which holds annual meetings and is attended by the top donors. The UK also par ticipates in DSG Policy Forum discussions held more regularly during the year
. The UK is ranked second of ICRC's donors (in 2013), accounting for 13.4% (CHF163.2 million) of all contributions received by ICRC. 

Funding to ICRC 
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £194 million to ICRC, 46% of which was core funding. DFID provided £117 million to ICRC in 2013–14, 47% of which was core funding. 


## Private Infrastructure Development Group

Multilateral summary The Private Infrastructure Development Group (PIDG) aims to address market and institutional failures that constrain the private sector's involvement in infrastructure development in order to foster economic growth and reduce pover ty
. 



First established in 2002 to launch the Emerging Africa Infrastructure Fund, the PIDG has developed a por tfolio of companies and facilities. The PIDG currently has 9 
 
members. 

 
Contribution to the MDGs PIDG directly contributes to MDG 1 and contributes to MDG 7. 

PIDG spend by sector PIDG facilities committed a total of $104 million to 19 projects in 2013 and $14 million to 14 technical assistance grants. By the end of 2013, PIDG facilities had committed $1.6 billion to 151 projects and $32 million to 
83 technical assistance grants. Cumulative administrative costs from 2002 were 2% of total commitments. 

Key achievements By the end of 2013, 187,900 permanent jobs had been created by the 46 PIDG suppor ted projects that were operational. 


-  35 projects suppor 
ted by PIDG facilities are now 
operational 
-  These 35 projects are delivering new or improved 
infrastructure to 98 million people 
 
-  The 35 projects have attracted $10.2 billion of 
private sector investment in infrastructure 
-  In addition, the Infrastructure Development 
Collaboration Par 
tnership Fund (DevCo) has 
provided transaction suppor 
t on another 11 
projects that are now operational 
-  These 11 projects are delivering new or improved 
infrastructure to 15 million people 
-  The 11 projects have attracted £0.8 billion of private 
sector investment in infrastructure 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

4 
Very good value for money for UK aid For 2014, DFID is chairing the PIDG Council which meets every 6 months. DFID has quar terly meetings with all the PIDG facilities that it suppor ts. The National Audit Office is carrying out a value for money study of the PIDG in 2014. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
 
Funding to PIDG 
Between 2010–11 and 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£144 million to PIDG 
 
facilities. DFID provided 
 
£152 million to PIDG in 
 
2013-14, 96% of which 
 
was core funding. Since 
 
PIDG's inception in 2002, 
 
DFID has been the largest contributor
. 

## Pidg Cumulative Commitments To 2013

Industrial infrastructure 12.7% Agri-infrastructure 4.5% Housing 4.4% Mining 2.4% Multisector 2.1% Water, sewage and sanitation 0.8% Urban development/infrastructure 0.1%  


## United Nations Development Programme Multilateral Summary The United Nations Development Programme (Undp)

provides assistance to 177 countries and has a 
 
leading role across a wide por tfolio, par ticularly in 
 
fragile and conflict-affected countries. Its mandate 
 
covers pover ty reduction and achieving the MDGs, 
 
democratic governance, crisis prevention and recovery, environment and sustainable development. UNDP has a central role in framing and implementing the new 
 
post-2015 global development goals. Cross-cutting 
 
themes such as gender equality and capacity building 
 
are also par t of UNDP's work. 

 
As well as delivering development programmes, UNDP 
 
is the UN's principal provider of development advice, 
 
advocacy and grant suppor t. It has a critical role in 
 
suppor ting the UN development system's collective 
 
impact. It funds and manages the UN's resident 
 
co-ordinators who lead the UN system in developing 
 
countries and it administers many of the UN's multidonor trust funds. 

## Undp Programme Expenditure, 2012

Contribution to the MDGs UNDP has a direct programmatic role on a number of MDGs and, combined with its role in supporting the international system's understanding of and commitment to MDGs, is central to their delivery
. 



Key achievements 
-  annual repor 
ting from country offices shows that in 
2013 over 43 million new voters were registered as a result of UNDP effor 
ts in election cycle management, 
and, across 13 countries, over 96 million additional people voted in elections 
 
 
-  in 2013, UNDP suppor 
t generated 6.5 million jobs 
and livelihoods in 113 countries, of which 58% were for women 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 
 
3 
Good value for money for UK aid UK core funding in 2012–2013 represented 10.3% of total core contributions and makes UK the 3rd largest donor
. 

DFID is a member of the UNDP Executive Board, the Depar tment under takes substantial bilateral engagement through regular programme management and strategic dialogue around the MAR. 

Funding to UNDP 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
Bar
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£783 million to UNDP
, 
21% of which was core 
 
funding. DFID provided 
 
£244 million to UNDP in 
 
2013–14, 23% of which was core funding. 

UNDP spend by sector In 2012, UNDP's total expenditure was $5.3 billion with $480 million (9%) as administrative costs. Over this period $4.5 
billion was spent on development activities. 

Managing energy and the environment for sustainable development 14.0% Supporting crisis prevention and recovery 24.0%  

## United Nations Population Fund

Multilateral summary The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) is the UN agency mandated to lead on sexual and reproductive health and rights and to suppor t countries in generating and using population data for policies and programmes to reduce pover ty
. 

 
 
UNFPA
's task is to ensure that every pregnancy is 
 
wanted, every bir th is safe, every young person is free 
 
of HIV/AIDS, and every girl and woman is treated with 
 
dignity and respect. It works directly with governments and par tners through 128 offices covering 156 
 
countries, and is guided by an internationally agreed framework for population and development. 

UNFPA spend by sector In 2012, UNFPA
's total expenditure was $810.7 million, of which programme expenses totalled $675.2 million. UNFPA breaks down its spend by outcome area. 



Contribution to the MDGs UNFPA works on MDG 3 (reduce child mor tality), MDG 5 (improve maternal health and achieve universal access to reproductive health and family planning) and MDG 6 (combat HIV and AIDS, malaria and other diseases). 

## Unfpa Programme Spend, 2012

Key achievements 
-  UNFPA met 25 of 27 of its development targets for 
2012, covering 7 outcome areas 
-  UNFPA established a secretariat to lead a 
global review of progress towards achieving the 
Programme of Action of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) - the international agreement that guides UNFPA's work worldwide 
-  UNFPA was a key actor in the 2012 Family 
Planning Summit, which led to $2.6 billion in new commitments from donor nations 
-  with UNFPA suppor 
t, 47 countries increased 
their own capacities for financing or providing reproductive health supplies and ser 
vices in 2012 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Adequate value for money for UK aid DFID is a member of the Executive Board which meets three times per year
. 

DFID also under takes significant bilateral engagement as it under takes regular programme management, and follows up on the MAR. 

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 


Funding to UNFPA 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£280 million to UNFPA, 
 
21% of which was core 
 
funding. DFID provided 
 
£120 million to UNFPA in 2013–14, 17% of which was core funding. 

 
 
HIV - and sexually transmitted infection - prevention services 5.0% Gender equality and reproductive rights 11.4% 
Young people's sexual and reproductive health and sexuality education 6.5% Data availability and analysis 10.9% 
Programme co-ordination and assistance 9.9% 

## United Nations High Commission For Refugees



Multilateral summary The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) leads and co-ordinates international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide. Its main purpose is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees. It also has a mandate to help stateless people. 

Contribution to the MDGs Humanitarian assistance is often a major source of suppor t for pover ty reduction in chronically poor
, fragile and conflict-affected countries where progress on the MDGs has been slowest. It can help vulnerable communities reduce vulnerability to crisis, protect their assets during shocks and prevent them from falling into deeper pover ty
. 

UNHCR spend by sector In 2013, the total UNHCR expenditure was $3.0 billion, with $193.5 million (6%) as administrative costs (taken to be the total cost of headquar ters). Detailed information on UNHCR spend by programme in 2012 is shown below. 



UNHCR's unique mandate and capability on the ground make the agency critical to delivering UK humanitarian priorities against the direct delivery of the MDGs. 

## Key Achievements In 2013, Unhcr:

 

-  the number of internally displaced people (IDPs) 
protected/assisted by UNHCR, including people in 
IDP-like situations, was 23.9 million 
 
-  63% of UNHCR operations repor 
ted having 
legislation in their countries protecting the rights of HIV-positive asylum seekers, an increase from 51% in 2008 
-  94% of UNHCR operations had ensured 24 hour, 
7 day a week access to emergency obstetric care for refugees 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

3 
Good value for money for UK aid 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 


Funding to UNHCR 
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £173 million to UNHCR, 62% of which was core funding. DFID provided £98 million to UNHCR in 
2013–14, 25% of which was core funding. 


## Unhcr Programme Expenditure, 2012

The UK is an active member of the Executive Committee (ExCom) which meets once a year
. The ExCom's Standing Committee, which the UK also attends, meets several times each year to carry on the body's work between plenary sessions. 

## United Nations Children'S Fund

Multilateral summary The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is the UN agency mandated to advocate for the protection and promotion of the rights of the child, to meet children's basic needs and expand their oppor tunities to reach their full potential. It works in more than 150 countries on issues such as improving child and maternal health (including through better nutrition and access to water and sanitation), girls' education, and HIV/AIDS. Its legitimacy, authority and universality are a key strength and its neutrality allows it to play a unique role in humanitarian crises, where it is the cluster lead for nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene, and co­ lead for education.  
UNICEF spend by sector In 2012, UNICEF's total expenditure was $3.9 billion. $3.3 billion was spent on direct programme assistance and 12% as management, administrative and programme suppor t costs. 21% of its income was earmarked for UNICEF's role in humanitarian emergencies in 2012. 

## Unicef Programme Assistance Spend, 2012

Contribution to the MDGs UNICEF has a critical role in the delivery of the MDGs. It implements at scale packages of services aimed at maternal, newborn and child survival. It advocates for children's rights and protects them from violence, exploitation and abuse, and puts a child focus on other issues such as HIV/AIDS. Its humanitarian response to shocks and disasters also contributes to the MDGs by maintaining progress in key areas such as reducing child mor tality
. UNICEF is also promoting an equity approach to achieving the MDGs, aiming to identify the poorest, most vulnerable children and make them the top priority
. 


## Key Achievements In 2013, Unicef:

 
-  suppor 
ted vaccination of approximately 2.2 million 
children under 5 in Syria 
 
-  helped 3.6 million school-aged children, including 
adolescents, to access basic education 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

4 
Very good value for money for UK aid The UK is an Executive Board Member and DFID was UNICEF's largest donor in 2012. DFID and UNICEF worked together on a successful Por tfolio Delivery Review, in order to strengthen shared strategic oversight of UNICEF's DFID-funded programme por tfolio. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 


Funding to UNICEF 
Between 2010–12 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided £631 million to UNICEF
, 
16% of which was core funding. DFID provided £207 million to UNICEF in 2013–14, 19% of 
 
which was core funding. 

## Unitaid

Multilateral summary UNITAID is a unique organisation seeking to impact markets for drugs, diagnostics and preventive inter ventions in HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB) and malaria. It reduces prices, increases access, and acts as a catalyst for companies to produce innovative treatments and formulations. UNITAID's grants are concentrated in poor countries 
 
with high disease burdens. The top 10 recipients 
 
of suppor t since its inception in 2006 are: Nigeria, 
 
Uganda, Kenya, Zambia, India, Tanzania, Ghana, 
 
Mozambique, Democratic Republic of Congo, 
 
and Zimbabwe. 

UNITAID spend by sector In 2013, UNITAID's total operating expenses were $148.8 million, with $20.0 million (13%) as administrative costs. UNITAID grant spend amounted to $128.8 million in 2013, broken down by the following sectors. 

Contribution to the MDGs UNITAID's overall mission aligns closely with MDG 6. UNITAID also contributes to MDGs 4 and 5 through the innovative products it suppor ts which reduce maternal and under 5 mor tality
. For example, UNITAID brought the first ever quality paediatric TB medicines to market and is one of the largest providers of quality childfriendly TB medicines. 

## Unitaid Total Grants To Implementers, 2013 Key Achievements In 2012, Unitaid:

 

-  achieved 10–24% price reductions for four second 
line anti-retrovirals (ARVs), 7–9% reductions for 
two paediatric ARVs and a 16% price reduction for specialised TB treatments 
-  provided 32,000 children living with HIV access 
to quality paediatric ARVs, and 15 new suppliers received approvals for paediatric formulations to treat HIV 
-  suppor 
ted 12 new suppliers of multi-disease 
resistant (MDR) TB to enter the market across the three diseases 
-  provided key suppor 
t to World Health Organization 
(WHO) to reduce the median number of days taken to prequalify a medicine from 795 in 2011, to 296 in 2012 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Some progress on average across reform areas 


3 
Good value for money for UK aid DFID chairs the Finance Committee and sits on the Board, Policy Committee and the newly formed Executive Committee. The UK helps suppor t UNITAID reform its governance and strengthen its leadership for improved performance. DFID is a 32% shareholder in UNITAID. 

Funding to UNITAID 
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £151 million to UNITAID, all of which was core funding. DFID provided £53 million to UNITAID in 2013–14, all of which was core funding. 


HIV/AIDS 35.2%  
Malaria 33.9%  
Tuberculosis 21.8%  
Special projects 3.0%  
Secretariat initiatives 2.8%  

## United Nations Office For The Coordination Of Humanitarian Affairs

Multilateral summary The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) co-ordinates UN-led responses to humanitarian crises. This includes facilitating needs assessments, mobilising funding and co-ordinating and monitoring the response. 

Contribution to the MDGs OCHA's focus is on co-ordinating the provision of humanitarian assistance. Humanitarian assistance is often a major source of support for pover ty reduction in chronically poor, fragile and conflict-affected countries where progress on the MDGs has been the slowest. It can help vulnerable communities to reduce their susceptibility to crisis, protect their assets during shocks and prevent them from falling into deeper pover ty. 

Key achievements 
-  throughout 2013, OCHA suppor 
ted the 
humanitarian system to become more efficient, 
effective and accountable, including through the 
roll-out of new tools and guidance for assessing humanitarian needs and strategic planning 
-  in 2013, OCHA responded to humanitarian 
emergencies affecting millions of people in countries such as Syria, Burma, Central African Republic, South Sudan and the Philippines 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 
3 
Good value for money for UK aid DFID is a member of the OCHA Donor Suppor t Group which advises OCHA on policy
, management, budgetary and financial matters. 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

2 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
 
Funding to UNOCHA 
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £98 million to OCHA, 55% of which was core funding. DFID provided £36 million to OCHA and OCHA-managed funds in 2013–14, 56% of which was core funding. 

UNOCHA spend by sector In 2013, total OCHA expenditure was £142 million, with £8.5 million (6%) on executive management and administrative costs. 

Humanitarian financing suppor t 
2.0% 

## World Bank Group

Multilateral summary The 5 institutions of the World Bank Group (WB Group) work together to achieve their shared goal of reducing pover ty and improving lives. The WB Group comprises: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which lends to governments of creditwor thy developing countries; the International Development Association (IDA), which provides interest-free loans and grants to governments of 
 
the poorest countries; the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which provides investments and advisory services to businesses and governments focusing exclusively on the private sector; the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), which promotes foreign direct investment into developing countries; and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), which provides international facilities for conciliation and arbitration of investment disputes. 

Contribution to the MDGs The WB Group focuses on generating sustainable growth, including infrastructure and economic governance, and pover ty reduction in developing countries. 

## Ibrd/Ida Commitments, Us Fiscal Year 2013

Key achievements In 2012–13, the WB Group suppor ted: 

-  the construction or rehabilitation of 73,101 km 
of roads 
-  social safety net programmes which covered 
104.9 million people 
-  the provision of access to an improved water 
source for 40.1 million people 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 
3 
IFC - Good value for money for UK Aid 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

4 
IDA - Very good value for money for UK Aid As one of the Group's largest shareholders, the UK is represented on the WB Group Boards by a dedicated Executive Director
. Boards approve all proposed investments from the Group's core resources. DFID also influences Group strategy when it negotiates its contributions to IDA, and it engages at operational level to monitor performance. 

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
  

## Funding To Wb Group The Uk Has A 4.2%

shareholding in IBRD, making it the fifth largest shareholder
, and a 5% 
shareholding in IFC, making it the fifth largest shareholder
. It typically provides 10–14% of contributions to IDA. Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID's total core funding to the World Bank was £3.0 billion. In 2013–14, DFID provided a further £1.2 billion. 



WBG spend by sector IBRD and IDA approved operations wor th $31 billion in US 
fiscal year 2013. Administrative costs were $2.4 billion (8%) 
of total approvals. Information on IFC expenditure can be found in the IFC Annual Repor t. 

Economic management 2% 
Environmental and natural resource management 8%  
Financial and private sector development 14%  
Human development 14% Public sector governance 12%  
Rule of law 2%  
Rural development 15%  
Social development, gender and inclusion 4%  
Social protection and risk management 13%  
Trade and integration 9%  
Urban development 9%  


## World Food Programme

Multilateral summary The World Food Programme (WFP) is the world's largest humanitarian agency. Its core business is to save lives and protect livelihoods in emergencies by providing food assistance. It is one of the very few agencies capable of delivering humanitarian aid at scale in often difficult or dangerous environments. 

Funding to WFP 
Between 2010–11 and 
 
2012–13, DFID provided 
 
£319 million to WFP
, 13% 
of which was voluntary 
 
core funding. DFID 
 
provided £294 million to WHO in 2013–14, 7% of which was core funding. 

WFP spend by sector In 2013, WFP's total expenditure (excluding administrative and programme suppor t costs) was $4.3 billion. 

Contribution to the MDGs MDG 1: WFP provided food assistance to 80.9 million people in 75 countries; of these 67.9 million were women and children MDG 2: 18.6 million school children received school meals/take home rations MDG 3: 52% of beneficiaries were women or girls MDG 4: 7.8 million malnourished children received special nutritional suppor t MDG 5: 3.0 million vulnerable women received additional nutritional suppor t MDG 6: 1.3 million people affected by HIV/AIDS received WFP food assistance in 31 countries 

Key achievements 
-  in 2013, WFP responded to 4 significant 
emergencies in Central African Republic, 
South Sudan, Syria and the Philippines 
-  the humanitarian emergency in Syria was WFP's 
largest operation in 2013. By December, WFP had scaled up its response to meet the needs of 
 
4.5 million people. Food assistance included a voucher-based nutrition programme for pregnant and lactating women and supplementary feeding for all children under 2 
 
-  in 2013, cash and vouchers represented 20% of 
WFP's total programme, reaching 7.9 million beneficiaries in 52 countries. Syria was the largest cash and voucher programme, exceeding $300 million 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 
3 
Good value for money for UK aid Engagement with WFP is led by the UK Mission in Rome, with suppor t from DFID Headquar ters. 

The UK has a full time seat on the WFP Executive Board and also takes par t in Board events. 

Multilateral Aid Review 2013 
3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 

## World Health Organization

Multilateral summary The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a critical role in setting health guidelines and standards to help countries address public health issues. The UK Depar tment of Health leads on the government's relations with WHO. DFID provides funding for the WHO's operations to strengthen health systems in developing countries, including its global programmes on malaria, polio, family planning, health workforce and tuberculosis, and in humanitarian settings. 

 
WHO spend by sector The Programme budget (total expenses for strategic objectives) at 31 December 2013 was $2 billion, of which enabling and suppor t functions were $180 million (8.9%). 

Contribution to the MDGs WHO provides global leadership on development and humanitarian health matters and is critical for the delivery of the health MDGs, especially in respect of reducing child mor tality; improving maternal health; 
and combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases. It brings together multiple players and provides a platform for engagement with countries in translating global norms and standards into clear policies, strategies and practices. 

## Who Programme Budget Total Expenditure, 2013 Key Achievements In 2013, Who Contributed To The Following Results:

 
-  ensuring health service delivery for 12.2 million 
people affected by Typhoon Haiyan 
-  over 1.8 million children between the age of 6 
months and 15 years old vaccinated against measles, and 2.2 million children under 5 years old vaccinated against polio 
-  by the end of 2013, provided access for 10 million 
people to antiretroviral therapy in low and middleincome countries 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2011 Dfid'S Engagement

 

## Multilateral Aid Review 2013

3 
Reasonable progress on average across reform areas 
  
2 
Adequate value for money for UK Aid WHO is governed by the World Health Assembly with representatives from 194 member states. DFID along with the UK Depar tment of Health actively par ticipates in WHO's governing body meetings. The UK will be a board member of the WHO Executive Board star ting in May 
2014 for the next 3 years and a member of the WHO Programme, Budget and Administration Committee for the next 2 years. 

Funding to WHO 
Between 2010–11 and 2012–13, DFID provided £259 million to WHO, 15% of which was voluntary core funding. DFID provided £166 million to WHO in 2013–14, 9% of which was core funding. 

 
malaria 10%  
Chronic non-communicable conditions 3%  
Child, adolescent, maternal, sexual  
and reproductive 6% Emergencies and disasters 9%  
Risk factors for health 2%  
Social/economic determinants of health 1%  
Healthier environment 2%  
Nutrition, food safety and food security 2%  
Health systems and services 8%  
Medical products and technologies 4%  
WHO leadership, governance and partnerships 6%  
Enabling and support functions (captures admin costs) 9%  

## Table 4.1: Key Achievements Of Other Multilateral Mar Organisations

This table includes key achievements for those multilateral organisations included in the MAR Update but not presented earlier in this chapter. Achievements are based on information available as at 7 May 2014, the date the Annual Report was drafted. In some cases this means that information for an organisation's achievements in 2013 was not available, so information for the latest period available has been provided. This is mentioned in the text where it is the case. 

| Key achievements                                                                                                     | Multilateral                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| organisation                                                                                                         |                                                                                                                 |
| UN agencies and Commonwealth                                                                                         |                                                                                                                 |
| OHCHR                                                                                                                | The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) suppor                                             |
| mandated by the Human Rights Council to Syria and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the fact-            |                                                                                                                 |
| finding missions to Mali and the Central African Republic. In each case, the COI has been critical in bringing to    |                                                                                                                 |
| light a wide range of human rights violations and drawn the attention of the international community to situations   |                                                                                                                 |
| and facts which otherwise would have gone unnoticed or not been documented.                                          |                                                                                                                 |
| PBF                                                                                                                  | - In Burundi, the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) funded the demobilisation of combatants to transform the National    |
| Liberation Front into a political par                                                                                | ty. It also provided crucial support to elections.                                                              |
| - In Cote d'Ivoire, the PBF enabled the government to re-establish state authority through reform and rehabilitation |                                                                                                                 |
| of policing infrastructure in the capital and rural areas. This was accompanied by training of more than 400         |                                                                                                                 |
| police and 53 traditional leaders in conflict mediation techniques in order to set up a network to support peace.    |                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                 |
| UNAIDS                                                                                                               | The UN Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has spearheaded efforts to increase domestic financing of           |
| the AIDS response, as part of the strategic shift away from traditional development co-operation and funding.        |                                                                                                                 |
| Domestic resources now account for more than half of all HIV funding in low and middle-income countries.             |                                                                                                                 |
| UNESCO                                                                                                               | The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) trained and coached 900           |
| education ministry officials in strategic planning and management.                                                   |                                                                                                                 |
| UN Women                                                                                                             | In 2012, with UN Women's assistance, women gained seats in 7 national elections. 26 countries reformed laws and |
| policies increasing women's access to economic assets and social protection, while 30 improved services              |                                                                                                                 |
| for survivors of gender-based violence. 15 nations incorporated gender equality priorities in national plans and     |                                                                                                                 |
| budgets.                                                                                                             |                                                                                                                 |
| CommSec                                                                                                              | The Commonwealth Secretariat (CommSec) enabled the world's smallest and most vulnerable countries to            |
| share with the G20 Chair and Development Working Group (DWG) members their experiences in addressing                 |                                                                                                                 |
| their development challenges, and their perspective on key actions needed during the Commonwealth/G20                |                                                                                                                 |
| Development dialogue, held in April 2013.                                                                            |                                                                                                                 |
| Through its youth programme, the Commonwealth Secretariat has delivered multi-week online interactive training       |                                                                                                                 |
| programmes to hundreds of youth workers, officials and youth leaders across Africa, and successfully piloted an      |                                                                                                                 |
| on-line Diploma in Youth Development.                                                                                |                                                                                                                 |
| IFAD                                                                                                                 | In 2012, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) supported the following:                    |
| - 265,000 hectares of constructed or rehabilitated irrigation schemes                                                |                                                                                                                 |
| - 2.5 million people actively borrowing from IFAD's rural financial services                                         |                                                                                                                 |
| - 1.5 million people trained in business and entrepreneurship                                                        |                                                                                                                 |
| - 110,000 rural enterprises accessing facilitated non-financial services                                             |                                                                                                                 |

## Multilateral Development Banks

| CDB                                                                                                               | The Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) supported:       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| - the construction or rehabilitation of more than 233 kilometres of road directly benefiting an estimated 282,000 |                                                       |
| people                                                                                                            |                                                       |
| - the provision of access to clean water and sanitation for over 4,000 households                                 |                                                       |
| - over 600 people working in, micro, small and medium size businesses with skills training and technical          |                                                       |
| assistance                                                                                                        |                                                       |
| - improvements in classroom facilities and increased access to finance to over 56,000 students                    |                                                       |
| IADB                                                                                                              | The Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) supported: |
| - 6.0 million people to receive a package of basic health services                                                |                                                       |
| - 3.9 million students to benefit from education projects                                                         |                                                       |
| - 240,000 households with a new or upgraded water supply                                                          |                                                       |
| Key achievements                                                                                         | Multilateral                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| organisation                                                                                             |                                                                                                             |
| EBRD                                                                                                     | Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia became full countries of operation for the European Bank for Reconstruction and |
| Development (EBRD). 21 projects to the value of €449 million were signed in 2013 across Jordan, Morocco, |                                                                                                             |
| Tunisia and Egypt.                                                                                       |                                                                                                             |

## Humanitarian Agencies

| GFDRR                                                                                                                | The Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) launched the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Pilot programme which allowed 5 Pacific island states to access market-based catastrophic risk insurance             |                                                                                                                    |
| solutions for the first time. The Marshall Islands, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu have secured       |                                                                                                                    |
| $45 million of ear                                                                                                   | thquake, tsunami and tropical cyclone risk coverage from the international insurance markets.                      |
| In India, GFDRR continued to provide technical suppor                                                                | t to reform the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme,                                                            |
| which together with its successor scheme has insured more than 29 million farmers.                                   |                                                                                                                    |
| IFRC                                                                                                                 | 22.6 million people were reached by disaster response and early recovery programmes and 15.1 million people        |
| were reached by preparedness and risk reduction programmes (figures from a sample of 37 national societies).         |                                                                                                                    |
| IOM                                                                                                                  | - The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) assisted 6,300 families in need affected or displaced by      |
| natural disasters in Afghanistan, including with 7,000 NFI (non-food item) kits and 1,600 emergency shelter kits.    |                                                                                                                    |
| - In Haiti, IOM provided returns assistance to 22,700 IDP (internally displaced person) households, facilitating the |                                                                                                                    |
| closure of 169 IDP camps.                                                                                            |                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                    |
| - In Mali, IOM supported 15,700 IDPs in urgent need of shelter and NFIs. Through its Displacement Tracking           |                                                                                                                    |
| Matrix (DTM), IOM carried out IDP registration and evaluations, as well as return movements monitoring,              |                                                                                                                    |
| reaching 353,500 IDPs and 138,000 returnees throughout the country.                                                  |                                                                                                                    |

## Effective Development Co-Operation

 
5.1  
DFID remains a recognised global leader in improving the value for money and impact of international development co-operation. As the UK meets its international target of investing 0.7% of gross national income in development suppor 
t and prepares for the post 2015 Millennium 
Development Goals (MDG) framework, making sure DFID delivers high quality, high impact co-operation is and will continue to be critical. 
5.2  
This chapter sets out a number of internal reforms DFID has made this year to become more effective and deliver higher value for money through UK spending as well as by influencing broader UK policies that have an impact on development. DFID tackles the long term causes of pover 
ty by 
building the 'golden thread' of open economies and open societies. The rule of law, fighting corruption and greater government transparency enable states to deliver for their citizens, and citizens to lead their own development. In general, DFID uses 4 internationally agreed principles to guide its work to become more effective as a development organisation: 
- focusing on results - giving ownership to developing countries 
- 
 increasing transparency 
- 
 suppor 
ting inclusive development par 
tnerships 
Each principle is covered in turn - and includes details of DFID's leadership role in the Global Par tnership for Effective Development Co-operation, which the UK Secretary of State for International Development co-chaired during 2013–14. 

## Focusing On Results

5.3  
Development suppor 
t is a means to an end, not an end in itself. That is why results - or impact on the 
poor - drive everything DFID does. By publishing results commitments and the results DFID has achieved (as set out in Chapter 2), streamlining management processes, innovating in delivery and evidence, strengthening financial controls and influencing UK policies, DFID aims to strengthen the accountability and credibility of its suppor 
t, and bring sustainable change for the poor. 

## Streamlining Dfid Management Processes

5.4  
To suppor 
t the results agenda, DFID has transformed its management structures to embed a results 
focus throughout its work - from managing, monitoring and evaluating, to communicating progress. Chapter 2 reflects DFID's results framework - which provides a means for senior management to receive regular management information on results, and review por 
tfolio performance, risks in 
delivery, and where and how to drive better value. These results flow throughout the organisation, as each DFID country office now publishes a results orientated and country specific Operational Plan. 
5.5  
In addition, government depar 
tments have been working together to join up effor 
ts overseas. In 2013, 
the UK initiated a 'One HMG team overseas' programme designed to rationalise, streamline and improve the way its 270 overseas locations,1 with varying combinations of government depar 
tments, 
function. 
 
5.6  
DFID has almost entirely re-engineered the way it manages programmes and increased the level of scrutiny over performance. This includes development of better, clearer guidance on financial control processes and the introduction of a new Finance Operating Model to strengthen financial 
management and control. Ministers now sign off all projects over £5 million and all new contracts over £1 million. More rigorous design templates and more systematic quality assurance have been introduced, and evaluation has been embedded across the organisation. 

5.7  
External scrutiny on the value for money and impact of DFID's spend, in par 
ticular from the National 
Audit Office (NAO) and the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI), is also critical in making 
DFID's development spend more effective and accountable. The NAO audits DFID's financial statements and conducts value for money studies on DFID. For example, the NAO produced a value for money study on DFID's work on malaria in 2013 and DFID is now implementing recommendations from the Public Accounts Committee on this issue. ICAI scrutinises development assistance spending across all UK government depar 
tments providing official development assistance (ODA) and has so 
far produced 34 repor 
ts covering a broad range of development programmes and activities. ICAI's 
work is overseen by the International Development Committee, who hold regular hearings to discuss their repor 
ts. 


5.8  
DFID led on government support for Bill Cash MP's International Development (Gender Equality) Act 2014, which became law on 13 May 2014. The Act makes it law to consider
, before providing development 
assistance, how the assistance will contribute to reducing gender inequality
. It also introduces a new 
annual reporting duty on progress towards achieving Millennium Development Goal 3. 

## Innovating In Delivery And Evidence

5.9  
Over the last 2 years, DFID has been testing innovative approaches to results, including through linking payments directly to the delivery of results, known as Payment by Results (PbR), and gathering more evidence of what works and does not. 
5.10  The most innovative forms of PbR link payments to the delivery of outcomes, providing the foundation 
for long term, sustainable change to people's lives. PbR can be used to: 
 
 
- Rebalance accountability: in traditional aid, by paying upfront DFID accepts the bulk of the risk of 
programme failure. PbR redresses this balance by transferring some of the risk for delivery to par 
tners. This sharpens incentives for the implementing par 
tner to perform. 
 
- Increase innovation and flexibility in delivery: by not specifying how results should be achieved, 
implementing organisations are free to innovate to improve outcomes. 
 
- Increase transparency and accountability for results: through being open about agreed results, 
everyone is clearer about what is being targeted and whether it actually gets done, driving up 
empowerment and accountability for results. 
 
- Create a strong focus on performance in service providers, which has benefits beyond PbR. By 
being paid on results, ser 
vice providers are strongly encouraged to examine what is, and is not, 
working, driving up performance standards, management and measurement. 
5.11  DFID has recently published a strategy that sets out its objectives for PbR and the actions it will take 
to achieve them. DFID is at the forefront of international activity, mainstreaming more used forms and testing the most innovative forms of PbR, where payments are linked to outcomes. DFID depar 
tments 
and countries repor 
t that as of April 2014 there were 13 outcomes-based programmes that use DFID 
financing under way, including 7 funds that can be subdivided into around 100 separate projects. DFID also has a growing pipeline of outcomes-based programmes. 

## Smart Procurement, Better Value For Money

In 2013, DFID won the Char tered Institute of Purchasing and Supply's 'Best international procurement  
project' for its work to reduce the price of contraceptives in developing countries. Using what is known as the 'advance market commitment mechanism', DFID achieved a price reduction of 50% on Jadelle  
contraceptive implants which provides access to 27 million units for women in developing countries.  

## Piloting Payment By Results In Health



In the Health Results Innovation Trust Fund, payments are disbursed on the verified delivery of results, such as the percentage of women receiving antenatal care and having their babies delivered in health facilities. Early results are positive. Between 2010 and 2012, the number of deliveries with skilled bir th attendants suppor ted by the fund in Afghanistan and Burundi increased by 83% from 190,000 to 347,130. 

5.12  DFID's Research and Evidence Division (RED) is responsible for suppor 
ting DFID to become more 
systematic in the use of evidence and thereby have greater development impact. It combines research, evaluation and the heads of DFID's professional cadres. Its 3 aims are to: 
 
- suppor 
t the development of new technologies and innovations which should have impact on 
pover 
ty or the effects of pover 
ty 
 
- find better and more cost effective ways of delivering development to those who need it 
 
- improve understanding of key development questions to suppor 
t best policy choices 
 
5.13  Specifically, DFID has continued to invest in rigorous programme evaluation as a means of learning 
and enhancing its development impact. The number of evaluations and the evaluation capacity of staff have increased significantly according to a recent review of the decentralised approach to commissioning evaluation. Evidence of the impact of recent evaluations on new programme and policy design has been identified in a number of programmes including those in Burma, Bangladesh, Rwanda and Uganda and regional African programmes. A new evaluation strategy has been designed which will fur 
ther improve the quality and use of evaluation findings and will increase the 
extent to which evidence gaps and policy priorities influence a programme's decision to commission an evaluation. 
5.14  DFID has expanded its suppor 
t for strategic evaluation par 
tnerships with other donors and 
development agencies, par 
ticularly in the field of impact evaluation. Par 
tnerships with the World Bank 
and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3IE) suppor 
t leading edge evaluation 
approaches to DFID's own programmes and those funded by the wider development community and advance the global evidence base in areas where it is most needed. DFID has continued to work with other donors and developing country governments to improve evaluation capacity and has recently published a 5 country study of the demand and supply for evaluation in 5 African countries. 

## Strengthening Financial Controls

5.15  DFID continues to implement the recommendations of the ICAI to improve systems to safeguard aid 
funds from the risk of misuse, and to help countries with which DFID works to tackle often pervasive corruption that undermines their sustainable development, dispropor 
tionately hur 
ts poor people and 
corrodes public institutions. Country specific anti-corruption plans are now operational in all DFID's priority countries. DFID has also recently expanded its internal audit capability to enable an enhancement of its risk based approach. This will ensure that DFID's country offices can be subject to review every 2 years (rather than the current average of 4). 
5.16  Cross-DFID co-ordination is led by the Counter Corruption and Counter Fraud Group, chaired at 
Director General level, which ensures strategic oversight of implementation of reforms. To date, over 750 staff have been trained to under 
take due diligence reviews of par 
tners. An online corruption risk 
management course has been developed and piloted for 40 par 
ticipants. Over 160 staff have 
obtained cer 
tification on anti-corruption exper 
tise through online training provided by DFID's 
sponsorship of the multi-donor U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (www.U4.no). 
5.17  DFID has a zero tolerance approach to fraud and corruption and actively investigates all suspicions and 
allegations of fraud, corruption and abuse of DFID resources. DFID takes a robust approach once fraud has been identified (with effective incident investigation and strengthening of controls to prevent recurrence) and has a good record on recovery of lost funds. The results of work on proven fraud on a country by country basis are shown in Table 5.1. The gross loss figure is the initial proven fraud loss to 
DFID, and the net loss figure is the total/final loss to DFID once a recovery has been made. 

| Gross                        | Net       | Gross     | Net     | Gross    | Net     |
|------------------------------|-----------|-----------|---------|----------|---------|
| Bangladesh                   |           |           |         |          |         |
| 700,030                      | 700,000   | 700       | 0       | 95,011   | 0       |
| Burma                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 0         | 0       | 344      | 0       |
| Burundi                      |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 15,000    | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Colombia                     |           |           |         |          |         |
| 1,786                        | 1,786     | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Democratic Republic of Congo |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 81        | 0       | 164,733  | 162,794 |
| Ethiopia                     |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 0         | 0       | 5,500    | 0       |
| Ghana                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 640                          | 540       | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| India                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 252,317                      | 0         | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Indonesia                    |           |           |         |          |         |
| 44,323                       | 0         | 326       | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Kenya                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 1,147,764                    | 0         | 31,867    | 0       | 9,967    | 0       |
| Kyrgyz Republic              |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 11,000    | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Malawi                       |           |           |         |          |         |
| 598,679                      | 0         | 350       | 350     | 147,064  | 34,440  |
| Mozambique                   |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 203,530   | 0       | 193      | 0       |
| Nepal                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 39,941                       | 0         | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Nigeria                      |           |           |         |          |         |
| 1,490                        | 1,490     | 34,115    | 110     | 10,798   | 10,238  |
| Pakistan                     |           |           |         |          |         |
| 71,050                       | 0         | 158       | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Palestine                    |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 570       | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Philippines                  |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 0         | 670     | 0        |         |
| Rwanda                       |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 0         | 0       | 883      | 0       |
| Sierra Leone                 |           |           |         |          |         |
| 1,455                        | 0         | 523,642   | 0       | 88,267   | 0       |
| Somalia                      |           |           |         |          |         |
| 296,542                      | 266,888   | 472,159   | 472,159 | 36,740   | 0       |
| South Sudan                  |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 0         | 0       | 2,300    | 0       |
| Southern Africa              |           |           |         |          |         |
| 200                          | 200       | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Tanzania                     |           |           |         |          |         |
| 9,300                        | 0         | 0         | 0       | 12,066   | 0       |
| Uganda                       |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 2,650     | 0       | 67,444   | 0       |
| United Kingdom               |           |           |         |          |         |
| 2                            |           |           |         |          |         |
| 31,159                       | 18,138    | 9,579     | 9,579   | 123,806  | 0       |
| USA                          |           |           |         |          |         |
| 3                            |           |           |         |          |         |
| 182,629                      | 182,629   | 0         | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Yemen                        |           |           |         |          |         |
| 0                            | 0         | 4,410     | 2,205   | 0        | 0       |
| Zambia                       |           |           |         |          |         |
| 6,401                        | 6,401     | 19,461    | 7,852   | 706      | 0       |
| Zimbabwe                     |           |           |         |          |         |
| 9,049                        | 0         | 0         | 0       | 5,756    | 0       |
| Totals                       |           |           |         |          |         |
| 3,394,750                    | 1,178,071 | 1,329,598 | 492,255 | 772,247  | 207,472 |

5.18  Internationally, DFID continues to par 
tner with the anti-money laundering technical assistance 
programmes of both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. It works with the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime to develop a programme to promote better coherence between aid donors and developing country par 
tner governments on implementing the United Nations 
Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). The Par 
tnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge (PACK) 
initiative was launched at the Conference of States Par 
ties in Panama in November 2013. 
2  UK related losses are a mixture of losses from frauds committed by UK based staff and equipment loss/theft involving UK based 
assets. 
3  Losses against the USA relate to humanitarian equipment stolen from a DFID warehouse in Miami storing aid intended for the 
Caribbean. 

| 2011–12    | 2012–13    | 2013–14    |
|------------|------------|------------|

 

## Influencing Uk Policies: Policy Coherence For Development

5.19  Although DFID's work to spend UK aid as effectively as possible is critical, DFID also need to 
consider how its suppor 
t fits into a bigger picture of all factors which drive development. Non-aid 
policies often have economic and social impacts abroad - so it is wor 
th making effor 
ts to harness 
them for development. This is known as the 'beyond aid' agenda, or the 'policy coherence' agenda. 
In the UK, it is seen as delivering development in a joined up manner. 
5.20  The UK government is currently designed to suppor 
t being joined up in 3 specific ways. First, having 
a separate depar 
tment with a remit to pursue pover 
ty reduction is impor 
tant. DFID has a remit to 
provide analysis and advice about the impact of UK policies on pover 
ty reduction, to complement its 
spending. Second, the Secretary of State for International Development, as a Cabinet Minister, is consulted on the full range of government policies that might impact on development. Third, the Secretary of State's membership of the National Security Council (NSC) and DFID ministers' membership of other specific Cabinet sub-committees, complemented by cross-depar 
tmental 
groups at official level, such as; NSC (Emerging Powers), NSC (Threats, Hazards, Resilience and Contingencies); Public Expenditure (Efficiency and Reform); NSC (Afghanistan); and Economic Affairs (Trade and Investment), enable the government to take a comprehensive and strategic approach to a series of policy issues that are critical to international development. 
5.21  These 3 structures deliver results. The Centre for Global Development's Commitment to Development 
Index ranks 27 developed countries on how well they are living up to their potential to help poor countries. The Index scores 7 policy areas (aid, trade, finance, migration, environment, security and technology) and ranks members based on their commitment to promote coherent development policies that go beyond just that of foreign aid. The 2013 Index ranked the UK seventh out of 27 countries, the only G7 member in the top 10. 
5.22  More specifically, in 2013–14 DFID sought oppor 
tunities to deliver development results through UK 
policies in the following 6 areas: 

## (1) Facilitating Trade And Knowledge Transfer

5.23  The joint DFID/Depar 
tment for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Trade Policy Unit (TPU) ensures 
that the UK government's development objectives are fully integrated into trade policy. TPU suppor 
ts 
developing countries to increase their par 
ticipation in global trade by improving their market access 
and strengthening their capacity to trade. For example, there has continued to be strong demand for the work of the Trade Advocacy Fund, which is now active in more than 20 developing countries. In December 2013, the Bali package was agreed through the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the first multilateral trade deal reached in 20 years, and the UK has also continued its work to deliver development outcomes through the EU, for example negotiating greater market access for Pakistan and encouraging progress on Economic Par 
tnership Agreement negotiations between the EU and 
regional blocs in Africa and the Pacific. 
5.24  DFID funded research is producing a wide range of development outcomes which benefit people in 
developing countries. In the past year DFID research has helped to produce and test new anti­ malarial drugs, produce crops with enhanced nutritional content, and improve access to clean drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in some of world's poorest countries. For example, DFID's agriculture research programme is backing new agricultural technologies and practices which are boosting food production, nutrition and incomes benefiting millions of people across the developing world. More than 100,000 farmers in India are now planting flood tolerant rice, and over half a million families in Africa are consuming vitamin A enriched sweet potato. NECT
, a new drug for sleeping 
sickness, is now available in the 12 African countries where 99% of the cases occur. DFID also tests new ways of doing things such as through the joint clinical trials programme with the Medical Research Council (MRC) and Wellcome Trust, which increases impact and value for money, and under 
takes research to understand the environment in which DFID operates. 
5.25  Over the last year, DFID research projects have also attracted independent recognition, winning the 
Civil Ser 
vice Award for Operational Excellence, two Climate Week awards, a British Exper 
tise 
International Award, a NEF Innovation award, two FT/IFC Sustainable Finance awards and two awards for the Drugs for Neglected Tropical Diseases initiative. 

## M-Kopa

M-KOPA allows poor consumers who cannot afford an electricity connection to their homes to purchase  
solar lights and a solar panel by paying a daily charge of around 30p through their mobile phone. In the last 2 years, M-KOPA helped deliver a 47% cost reduction in pay-as-you-go technology (from $15 to $8 per unit). As of April 2014, M-KOPA is actively providing affordable solar power to over 60,000 Kenyan households and adding over 1,000 more every week.  

## African Community Access Programme (Afcap)

AFCAP works across 7 east African countries to improve the cost effectiveness and sustainability of road construction. The programme has researched road usage and drafted policies and schemes to improve road safety and reduce road traffic accidents, as well as building the capacity of local researchers to help establish a sustainable model for road network improvements. AFCAP is estimated to have already saved £13.7 million in road building costs in par tner African countries, and has potential savings of up to 
£490 million if rolled out across Kenya alone. 

## (2) Encouraging Transparent And Responsible Business

5.26  DFID works closely with other government depar 
tments - BIS and the Foreign and Commonwealth 
Office (FCO) in par 
ticular - to shape measures that influence how business contributes to 
development results. In 2013, DFID intensified its work on the Trade and Global Value Chains Initiative which works with global businesses to improve working conditions and job oppor 
tunities in the 
hor 
ticulture and garment sectors. Over 700,000 people in Kenya, South Africa and Bangladesh are 
expected to benefit from this. 

## Sharing The World Class Experience Of The London Stock Exchange

In east Africa, capital markets are growing, with the 4 regional stock exchanges covering a combined market capitalisation of over $31 billion. In January 2014, DFID entered into par tnership with the London Stock Exchange to suppor t capital market development in sub-Saharan Africa through training for financial sector professionals and government officials from Tanzania, which will be replicated across east Africa and beyond. 

5.27  DFID also continued to suppor 
t the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises, and the Extractive 
Industries Transparency Initiative. 

## (3) Helping (Non-Aid) Finance Flow For Development

5.28  DFID recognises that low-income countries do not want to be aid dependent. They want to raise more 
domestic taxes and other financial flows. In 2002 most of the external financing for poor African countries came from aid - today most development finance for African countries comes from domestic revenues, private flows and investment. During the UK G8 Presidency in 2013 DFID worked hard with colleagues across Whitehall - especially HM Treasury - to ensure that the interests of developing countries were put at the centre of an ambitious G8 agenda on trade, transparency and tax reform. At Lough Erne, G8 members made unprecedented commitments to help developing countries to collect the taxes owed to them and to benefit from changing global standards, including the new international standard of automatic exchange of information that will make it easier to find and punish tax evaders. 
5.29  In addition, DFID continues to fund units of UK law enforcement in the Metropolitan Police Ser 
vice to 
tackle the tracing and recovery of stolen funds from developing countries and in the City of London Police to tackle bribery by UK citizens or companies in developing countries. DFID has agreed to scale up these effor 
ts. The Metropolitan Police unit has been at the forefront of the UK response to 
requests from countries in the Arab region for recovery of assets. 
 
5.30  Last but not least, remittances are an impor 
tant source of capital. An estimated $401 billion in 
remittances were transferred to developing countries in 2012, rising by 5.3% from 2011. At the same time, the global average cost for remitting $200 or its equivalent in 2012 was estimated at 9%. For sub-Saharan Africa, this cost is estimated to be over 12%. The UK is therefore exploring ways of reducing the cost of remittances through suppor 
ting the development of technology-enabled 
payments infrastructure in developing countries. This includes suppor 
t for regulatory and policy 
reform; and development of payments infrastructure and scale-up through investment of successful business models. The UK is committed to ensuring remittances continue to flow through secure, accessible and formal channels, following the global withdrawal of banks from the sector, and has established an Action Group on Cross Border Remittances. This group is made up of government, the private sector, regulators and civil society, to identify actions to strengthen the UK's remittance work, such as the development of a safer corridor pilot for UK–Somalia remittances. 

## G8 Lough Erne Summit: Fair Taxes, Increased Transparency And Open Trade

During the UK Presidency DFID worked hard with its colleagues across Whitehall to ensure that the interests of developing countries were put at the centre of an ambitious G8 agenda on trade, transparency and tax reform. The G8 has always recognised that the fight against pover ty has to be an integral par t of the response to global economic challenges. This has become more impor tant as the development context is changing with new sources of development finance and an increased range of par tners, including emerging economies, the private sector and foundations. In 2002 most of the external financing for poor African countries came from aid - today most development finance for African countries comes from domestic revenues, private flows and investment. It is therefore right that the G8's role in international development is evolving. The G8 has an impor tant role helping to shape the rules which characterise a fair and open global economy, including by putting its own house in order regarding the fair taxes, increased transparency and open trade that are vital drivers of this. Not only are they impor tant for global prosperity, but they will also help lift developing countries out of pover ty by allowing them to raise revenues from trade, taxes and the sale of their natural resources, so that they can fund their own development. The G8 at the Lough Erne Summit has continued to show leadership in transforming the relationship between developed and developing countries to one of global par tnership. Developing and developed countries have a responsibility to work together for global economic growth. 

## (4) Supporting Peace-Keeping And Building Resilience

5.31  DFID continues to manage the tri-depar 
tmental Conflict Pool jointly with FCO and the Ministry of 
Defence, aimed at preventing conflict and tackling threats to UK interests arising from instability overseas. In the last year, the Pool has invested in programmes to tackle cross-border impacts of the Syrian civil war, including through funding from the Pool's Early Action Facility, the planning of a large programme to improve access to security and justice in Libya, and programmes to address the risks to stability in west Africa and the Sahel. The Pool's Early Action Facility has also provided rapid response funding for Central African Republic and Ukraine. In June 2013 the NSC agreed to reform decision making around countries at risk of instability, creating a clearer, simpler, more strategic framework that will fur 
ther strengthen cross-government coherence. To reinforce this change, from 
April 2015, the UK will establish a new £1 billion Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF), comprising ODA and non-ODA, which will replace the existing cross-government Conflict Pool. DFID is fully engaged in the design of this fund. 

## (5) Producing And Consuming Sustainably

5.32  The UK's transition to a low-carbon economy is continuing to help constrain global greenhouse gas 
emission levels, with benefits for developing countries in par 
ticular. DFID has worked closely with the 
Depar 
tment of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Depar 
tment for Environment, Food and 
Rural Affairs (DEFRA), FCO and BIS on climate change and food security policy, including on how agriculture is treated in the negotiations for a new global agreement under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and on effor 
ts to set up a new global alliance on climate-smar 
t 
agriculture. DFID has also worked with other depar 
tments to ensure UK biofuel policy is consistent 

 
 
with UK development objectives, in par ticular to highlight concerns about the potential negative impacts investment in biofuel may have on land rights and food security in developing countries. DFID also works closely with BIS, DEFRA and UK Trade and Investment on the implementation of the UK Agricultural Technologies Strategy. Launched in July 2013, the strategy brings together government, the science base and industry. The strategy aims to ensure UK innovation and exper tise contributes to the development of new technology to increase agricultural productivity in the UK and developing countries. DFID engagement has ensured that the strategy considers the international impact of investment in agricultural technologies. In February 2014, DFID, with the FCO, Home Office and DEFRA organised an international conference, chaired by the Foreign Secretary with attendance from HRH The Prince of Wales and HRH The Duke of Cambridge, to tackle the illegal international wildlife trade. 

## (6) Bringing In Talented People And Sharing Knowledge

5.33  The movement of about a billion people around the world generates economic benefits, knowledge 
sharing and skills acquisition, and makes labour markets more effective. DFID works closely with the Home Office and FCO on these issues. At the UN High Level Dialogue on Migration and Development in October 2013 the UK delegation was composed of representatives of the 3 depar 
tments who also 
worked closely together in the preparations for this meeting. The same co-ordinated approach is being taken for the annual meeting of the Global Forum on Migration and Development in Stockholm in May 2014, with DFID leading the delegation. DFID remains fully involved in the governance arrangements for the FCO-managed Returns and Reintegration Fund, jointly sponsored with the FCO, Home Office and Ministry of Justice, with DFID providing suppor 
t for programme inter 
ventions that 
are ODA-eligible. DFID is also working with other government depar 
tments to ensure a 
comprehensive and coherent approach to ending female genital mutilation/cutting and child and early forced marriage. The Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for International Development is the Prime Minister-appointed ministerial champion for tackling violence against women and girls overseas, with responsibility for ensuring coherence across Whitehall on this issue. 
5.34  DFID provided around 800 awards in 2013 to scholars and young professionals to study with UK 
institutions at postgraduate level through Commonwealth Scholarships. This is enabling the brightest and best from Commonwealth countries to study in UK postgraduate programmes and apply this learning to build capacity in their own countries. 
5.35  The Investment Facility for Utilising UK Specialist Exper 
tise (IFUSE) is an initiative, established in 
2012, to harness the exper 
tise of UK civil ser 
vants to suppor 
t improvements in the business 
environment of our par 
tner countries. So far, IFUSE has facilitated UK suppor 
t on energy policy to the 
Ethiopian government; micro-insurance sector development in Ghana; building safety in Bangladesh; and competition policy in Burma. 

## Giving Ownership To Developing Countries

5.36  Ownership of development co-operation by developing countries is essential for sustainable results. 
This means developing countries exercising political leadership to drive and demonstrate tangible commitment to their own development. As a provider of development co-operation the UK seeks to provide suppor 
t in ways that suppor 
t and strengthen local responsibility and leadership, including 
through specific instruments and the New Deal for fragile and conflict-affected states. 

## Specific Instruments For Working With Governments

5.37  In 2013–14, DFID spent around 44%4 of its development budget in the form of core contributions to 
multilateral organisations including the World Bank, the European Commission and the United Nations. Bilateral expenditure, accounting for the remainder of the budget, is spent through country programmes managed by DFID's country offices and through programmes managed centrally by DFID that often target a range of countries (such as the Girls' Education Challenge Fund). 
5.38  Given the diversity of need and context in DFID's par 
tner countries, DFID targets the instruments for 
how it delivers its development co-operation carefully. This is based on a consultative planning process that enables DFID to provide a predictable package of suppor 
t over typically a 3 year 
period. The star 
ting point is, where possible, to align with par 
tner countries' plans and priorities for 
pover 
ty reduction. DFID then takes into account evidence and analysis of what instruments offer the 
best value for money for achieving the specific results that are being targeted. 
5.39  In some countries, DFID provides development suppor 
t direct to ministries of finance or other 
ministries so that they can allocate it most efficiently to activities such as education and health for large numbers of poor people. This is known as general or sector budget suppor 
t - and accounts for 
around 10% of DFID's total bilateral spend. The benefit of this approach is that these ministries direct ser 
vices which impact many poor people, and therefore can deliver strong value for money and 
pover 
ty reduction gains. For this kind of finance, DFID ensures it is accompanied by sharing of 
exper 
tise on strengthening the civil service's effectiveness in setting policy, raising taxes and 
investing well. 
5.40  Overall, sector budget suppor 
t increased from £337 million in 2012–13 to £445 million in 2013–14, 
while general budget suppor 
t fell from £165 million to £107 million. The decline of the latter is for 2 
key reasons. First, more recently, many countries have made progress so that they no longer need such direct suppor 
t to the same extent for macroeconomic stability and are able to fund more 
recurrent costs. This is a sign of success, and it means bilateral spend is best delivered through other par 
tners, such as the private sector - as the critical engine for growth, jobs and income - or 
civil society - to help build accountability and uphold rights and freedoms. In other countries, such as fragile and conflict-affected states, budget suppor 
t carries too many risks. So DFID uses other forms 
of financial assistance which is not budget suppor 
t, but still works in ways which encourage and 
strengthen government systems to suppor 
t development and build capacity sustainably (eg the 
Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund). Multilateral organisations often help mitigate the risks of such funds. 
5.41  Whichever form of direct suppor 
t used, DFID uses a framework called 'Par 
tnership Principles' to 
gauge the ownership of par 
tner governments of development. The framework covers 4 issues: 
commitment to (i) reducing pover 
ty and achieving the MDGs; (ii) human rights and other international 
obligations; (iii) strengthening financial management and accountability, and reducing the risk of funds being misused through weak administration or corruption; and (iv) strengthening domestic accountability with citizens. DFID repor 
ts all cases where development assistance is reduced, 
suspended or delayed because of concerns about Par 
tnership Principles. In 2013–14 there were 

 
4 instances in which programmes were changed as a result of a breach to these principles, shown in Table 5.1. 

## Partnership Principles During 2013–14

| Country                         | Programme         |
|---------------------------------|-------------------|
| Mismanagement of public         |                   |
| funds through the government    |                   |
| financial systems.              |                   |
| Malawi                          | Health Sector     |
| Strategic Plan                  |                   |
| Sector Budget                   |                   |
| Support (SBS)                   |                   |
| Mozambique                      | Poverty Reduction |
| Budget Suppor                   | t                 |
| (PBRS)                          |                   |
| Concerns over fiscal            |                   |
| transparency and investment     |                   |
| prioritisation following the    |                   |
| granting of a government        |                   |
| guarantee to an $850 million    |                   |
| bond issue by the newly         |                   |
| created state tuna fishing      |                   |
| company.                        |                   |
| Rwanda                          | General Budget    |
| Support (GBS)                   |                   |
| Following assessments of the    |                   |
| Partnership Principles in May   |                   |
| and November 2013, the          |                   |
| Secretary of State              |                   |
| reprogrammed GBS into           |                   |
| development projects            |                   |
| designed to protect the         |                   |
| poorest groups.                 |                   |
| UK funds misappropriated by     |                   |
| Office of the Prime Minister of |                   |
| Uganda                          | GBS, health SBS   |
| and other direct                |                   |
| financial aid                   |                   |

Uganda. In 2012–13 the Government of Uganda repaid the £1.3 million of UK assistance which was found to have been misappropriated. 

## Helping Build Effective Institutions For Ownership

5.42  Countries will own their development when they have inclusive and effective institutions open to 
everyone and not controlled by the interests of a narrow elite. For DFID this means strategic investment in the institutions which will help create and sustain this future, strengthening the capacity of par 
tners and taking into account the country context, the desired results, the risks and the added 
value of UK assistance. However, as development cannot be achieved by governments alone, the UK Prime Minister has made it a priority to suppor 
t the range of institutions needed for countries to own 
and lead their own development, in what he has termed the 'golden thread' of development. Over the past 2 years DFID has increased suppor 
t for building blocks of key institutions, such as the rule of 
law, the absence of conflict and corruption, transparent tax regimes, free elections, and the presence of fair proper 
ty rights. To suppor 
t this, the UK has also increased suppor 
t for the private sector, as the 
engine for economic growth, and for civil society (including the media) to build accountability and uphold rights. 

## The New Deal For Fragile And Conflict-Affected States

5.43  The UK is a strong suppor 
ter of the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States, which provides a 
framework for development par 
tners to work with par 
tner countries in a way that builds mutual trust 
and suppor 
ts a country lead and its priorities, plans and systems. DFID is now one of the lead 
donors implementing the New Deal in Sierra Leone and Somalia (in addition to Afghanistan and South Sudan). 

Of the £20 million allocated to the Health Sector Strategic Plan, £8 million was paid and used for the purposes intended, and £12 million was withheld. A further £1 million was withheld from a separate HIV programme. PRBS disbursements were suspended in November 2013, until sufficient measures have been taken to address concerns about transparency and investment management. This affected payments scheduled for December 
2013 (£12 million) and February 2014 (£7.4 
million). This reduced the overall PRBS disbursement in 2013–14 to £24 million rather than £43.4 million as forecast. A total of £42 million GBS was forecast for 2013–14 (£21 million in June, £21 million in December). A £5 million performance tranche reforecast from 2012–13 was not disbursed; the other £37 million was reprogrammed into specific government sectors or programmes to continue to protect the poorest in Rwanda. In 2013–14 DFID indefinitely suspended all budget suppor 
t to the Government of Uganda.  
Direct financial aid was also ended with the exception of two projects. £17.5 million of budget support was reprogrammed in 2013–14. 

 

## Increasing Transparency

5.44  In 2013–14 DFID continued to be recognised as a global leader on transparency, culminating in its 
rating as the most transparent donor in the Global Par 
tnership for Effective Development Cooperation 
(GPEDC) Monitoring Repor 
t, published in April 2014. DFID has also continued to encourage others to 
improve transparency, for example through the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Steering Committee and as Chair of the IATI Technical Advisory Group. 
5.45  DFID has continued to make progress on the Aid Transparency Challenge launched by the Secretary 
of State at the end of 2012. DFID is increasing the traceability of all UK ODA, meaning it is now easier to trace money from taxpayer to beneficiary. Some key achievements in 2013–14 include: 
- launching the Development Tracker, using IATI open data to show what DFID is doing and where 
(http://devtracker.dfid.gov
.uk/). The Tracker enables visitors to the site to find detailed information 
about DFID projects all over the world, and follow money through the delivery chain from source to outcome. 
- geocoding - showing on maps where DFID funds are spent locally, with over 1900 locations now 
mapped. 
- 
 continuing to pilot beneficiary feedback approaches so that those directly affected by UK aid can 
input on how funds should best be spent to achieve required results. 
- 
 piloting the linking of DFID budget data with par 
tner developing country budget data, to make it 
easier for recipient governments to plan and budget for use of all resources at their disposal. 
- 
 ensuring that civil society organisations who receive DFID funds are more open and transparent, 
including requiring them to publish data to IATI standards on how they spend DFID funds. 
- 
 working with private sector suppliers to be more transparent with their development co-operation 
spending, including a successful pilot with a number of DFID's major private sector suppliers to publish data in IATI format which is now being rolled out to private sector suppliers covering 80% of DFID's direct procurement spend. 
- 
 championing transparency internationally, notably through securing a commitment under the UK's 
G8 Presidency for all G8 members to publish to the Busan common standard for aid transparency, including IATI, by 2015. 

## Complaints To The Parliamentary Ombudsman

5.46  No complaints against DFID were accepted for investigation by the Parliamentary Ombudsman in 
2013. One complaint against DFID (carried over from the previous calendar year) was repor 
ted on by 
the Parliamentary Ombudsman during 2013–14. This complaint was upheld and the Ombudsman's recommendations were accepted and complied with. 

## Supporting Inclusive Development Partnerships

 
 
5.47  Inclusive development considers all stakeholders. DFID works with and encourages a diverse set of 
par 
tners to improve, including multilateral and civil society organisations, beneficiaries at grassroots 
level, the UK public, the private sector, philanthropic foundations, local government, researchers, the media and parliamentarians. Openness, trust, mutual respect and learning remain at the hear 
t of 
DFID's par 
tnerships in suppor 
t of achieving development goals. 

## Working With Civil Society And The Private Sector6 To Deliver For Others

5.48  Around 16% of DFID's bilateral programme is carried out by civil society organisations (CSOs), which 
include NGOs, community-based organisations, media organisations, faith groups and diaspora organisations. In 2013–14 DFID's Civil Society Depar 
tment in the UK provided funding to: 
- 112 CSOs through the Global Pover 
ty Action Fund to deliver the MDGs, benefiting over 10.9 million 
people in 33 countries 
- disabled people's organisations in 20 countries through the Disability Rights Fund, to campaign for 
the rights of disabled people 
- 1,800 CSOs in 100 countries through the Governance and Transparency Fund, to help citizens 
hold their government to account 
- 
 41 CSOs through Programme Par 
tnership Arrangements, providing flexible strategic funding to 
enable them to enhance results, improve accountability and encourage innovation. 
5.49  In addition to these centrally funded CSO programmes, DFID suppor 
ts CSOs in almost all of its focus 
countries, but the relative impor 
tance varies widely - from a very small propor 
tion to around half the 
value of a country programme. Delivery through civil society is par 
ticularly high in fragile states. 
5.50  DFID continues to place a strong emphasis on value for money, monitoring and evaluation, and 
transparency in its work with civil society. It has been working closely with BOND, the UK membership body for NGOs working in international development, to improve effectiveness and transparency in the sector. It also suppor 
ts a learning par 
tnership of CSOs to share best practice in the sector. 
5.51  DFID often uses private suppliers to deliver its programmes. UK companies compete for UK 
development assistance contracts alongside non-UK competitors in a fair, open and transparent process. DFID does not give UK companies preferential treatment - meaning 100% of DFID assistance is untied and has been so since 2001. Untying means that par 
tner countries and DFID are 
able to ensure that goods and services are obtained in the most cost effective way. This gives greater oppor 
tunity to local providers who can also offer local jobs and employment. Nonetheless British 
companies have continued to be very successful, winning over 90% of contracts awarded by DFID and also competing successfully for contracts from other international development agencies. To improve value for money from private suppliers DFID has: 
 
- improved its procurement processes. This included increasing the use of framework agreements; 
introducing contracts centred on actual achievements; increasing performance-based payment contract mechanisms and reducing procurement timescales. 
 
- strengthened supplier performance management. A Key Supplier Management programme is now 
in place with DFID working closely with its top 11 suppliers to focus on value for money. 
 
- held its first supplier conference in July 2013, with the second scheduled for 9 July 2014. Focusing 
on key strategic items such as value for money and transparency, attendees are not only DFID's key suppliers but also small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and NGOs. In addition workshops are being held on a regular basis with suppliers (both key and wider SMEs and NGOs) to discuss issues and share lessons which will enable DFID to manage contracts more effectively. 
 
- insisted that its suppliers, including NGOs, sign up to a code of conduct, and over 800 have 
already signed. This statement of priorities and expectations sets out standards DFID expects its suppliers to meet on value for money, transparency and accountability. 
 
- under 
taken ongoing activities to raise commercial awareness across DFID. Within the 
Depar 
tmental Improvement Plan, the commitment that 50% of all senior civil servants attend 
commercial training before April 2014 was achieved, with the intention for the remainder to complete the training during 2014–15. DFID is also working with front line staff to improve commercial practice including contract management in addition to appointing commercial advisors in key strategic spending depar 
tments to provide commercial exper 
tise on the ground. 
 
- in November 2013 been awarded the Char 
tered Institute of Purchasing and Supply 'Best 
international procurement project' for work to reduce the price of contraceptives for women in developing countries. 

## Encouraging Emerging Powers To Deliver For Others

5.52  In 2013–14 DFID continued work to strengthen the UK's development par 
tnerships with emerging 
powers - maintaining relationships and dialogue on global challenges that have an impact on development, working together to increase their effectiveness through sharing best practice and disseminating innovations. In addition, the National Security Council Emerging Powers sub-committee oversees the UK's strategy for creating deeper relationships with emerging powers across UK policy and programmes. 
5.53  DFID has continued to make progress through its network of country teams in Brazil, China, India, 
South Africa, Colombia and Indonesia. Most notably this year: 
- co-hosting the 'Nutrition for Growth' event with Brazil in June 2013 - deepening DFID's work as 
global advocates for combating hunger and under-nutrition 
- signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the China Development Bank to enhance the 
impact, quality and sustainability of investments made by the UK and China in Africa 
- 
 collaborating with India's Development Par 
tnership Administration through the UK–India Global 
Development Dialogue 
- 
 committing in the 2013 UK–South Africa Bilateral Forum Communiqué to work together with South 
Africa to deliver effective development results both regionally and globally. 
DFID's **Global Development Partnership Programme** (GDPP) was set up in 2010 to suppor t DFID's  
new relationships with emerging powers. Through the GDPP
, DFID has developed an innovative por tfolio  
of projects and policy dialogues to catalyse collaboration. This work focuses on global issues that have an impact on the world's poor and regional initiatives, as well as work with specific third countries (including some trilateral co-operation). Continued work with Brazil on climate-smar t agriculture and nutrition in Africa has not only expor ted  
Brazilian exper tise to a number of African countries, but has also served as the foundation for the UK's  
global alliance with Brazil on Nutrition for Growth. Collaboration with China will enable low-income countries to learn from China's success in reducing infant, child and maternal mor tality rates, disease  
prevention and control, and health sector reform. The GDPP has also enabled the scaling up of work with Indian pharmaceutical manufacturers to lower the cost of life-saving medicines across the developing world (saving £1 billion on essential drugs and vaccines). It has suppor ted the sharing of India's model on health financing and the sharing of South  
African exper tise on health planning and procurement with other African countries. A new GDPP project  
was also launched in 2013–14 to enable African countries to maximise the advantage of India's trade preferences to low income countries.  

## Making Multilaterals More Effective

5.54  Chapter 4 covers DFID's work with multilaterals. DFID continues to drive improved effectiveness in the 
multilateral system, including through follow-up to the 2011 Multilateral Aid Review (MAR). A MAR update was performed in 2013–14, which found good progress in some areas and organisations, but that more improvements were still needed in others. 

## Promoting Effectiveness Internationally: The Global Partnership For Effective Development Co-Operation

The Global Par tnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) embraces the broad range of development par tners across the globe and the many diverse approaches to development co-operation. 

It recognises that country context is crucial and that there is no 'one-size-fits-all' approach to reducing pover ty and fostering sustainable development. It suppor ts all development par tners to follow the 4 
shared principles of effective co-operation, which have been embedded in DFID, as set out above. In addition, the GPEDC has also brought an impor tant shift from aid effectiveness to development effectiveness, moving the focus from aid flows to a more strategic approach. During 2013–14, the UK played a key role in the GPEDC's establishment, in par ticular through the Secretary of State for International Development's co-chair role alongside ministers from Nigeria and Indonesia. The UK worked hard with others - including the UN, the OECD, private sector par tners and foundations - to suppor t preparation for the GPEDC's first ever High Level Meeting in Mexico City in April 
2014, the outcomes of which included the launch of 39 new voluntary initiatives - including concrete commitments to strengthen tax administrations in developing countries, and guidelines to help the philanthropic sector engage with governments and others. DFID will repor t in more detail on the outcomes of this meeting and DFID's fur ther work to suppor t the GPEDC in the 2014–15 Annual Repor t and Accounts. More information on the GPEDC is available at www.effectivecooperation.org.  

## Accounts: Department For International Development

These accounts have been prepared in accordance with directions given by Her Majesty's Treasury (HM Treasury) in pursuance of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. 

## 6.1 Strategic Report 6.1.1 What We Do

The Depar tment for International Development (DFID) leads the UK's effor ts to end extreme pover ty globally. An over view of this work and of our strategic priorities, is presented in Chapter 1 of this Annual Repor t. 

We measure progress by the results we achieve and the difference made to people's lives. The public can find case studies that bring these achievements to life and show how our policies are put into practice at www.gov
.uk/government/collections/case-studies. Chapters 1 to 5 of this Repor t provide an in-depth assessment of our results over the past year. 

## 6.1.2 Non-Departmental Public Bodies

DFID has 2 non-depar tmental public bodies (NDPBs). These are the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (CSC) and the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI). The spending of both is consolidated within DFID's accounts. Fur ther information on the activities of CSC and ICAI are presented within the Governance Statement in section 6.7. 

## 6.1.3 Other Public Sector Bodies

 
On behalf of the UK government, the Secretary of State for International Development holds 100% of the issued share capital of the CDC Group plc, an investment company which invests in private sector businesses in developing countries. 

## 6.1.4 Efficiencies And Savings

DFID continues to improve its operational processes to deliver the administrative cost savings required under the current spending review (SR10). This is being achieved through reductions in proper ty, IT
, use of consultants and other organisational efficiencies. Alongside this, the Depar tment has increased its investment in front line staffing. In terms of programme expenditure, the Depar tment's budget is set to deliver the UK official development assistance/ Gross National Income (ODA/GNI) target of 0.7% from 2013. The UK announced in March this year that it had met its target of spending 0.7% of GNI on ODA in 2013. More information on the 2013 ODA/GNI target can be found within Chapter 1. Fur ther information on how DFID maximise value for money and overall impact is set out in Chapter 5 of this Repor t. In addition, DFID is working with other government depar tments to reduce costs by sharing facilities and ser vices at overseas posts were possible. 

## 6.1.5 Financial Review Resource Budgets

 
DFID has 2 separate budgets controlled through Depar tmental Expenditure Limits (DELs). These are net resource spending (RDEL) and net capital expenditure (CDEL). There is a fur ther separate budget allocation for Annually Managed Expenditure (AME). AME is used to reflect costs which are volatile in a way that cannot be fully controlled by DFID, including the creation and utilisation of provisions reflected within the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The DEL and AME budgets are split into voted and non-voted amounts within the Estimate. The DEL budget is fur ther split into total permitted administration costs and programme expenditure. 

A breakdown and comparison of outturn against the Estimate totals is included within the Statement of Parliamentary Supply. Additional detailed actual spending during 2013–14 against estimate subheads is repor ted in the analysis of net resource outturn by section. Estimates for each sub­
heading are finalised in the Supplementary Estimate with work to formulate these numbers taking place in December each year. The Depar tmental Board, suppor ted by the Executive Management Committee, controls and monitors expenditure against these targets throughout the year. DFID achieved an underspend of £167.2 million on DEL compared with the voted estimate for the year. This comprised £143.3 million in respect of Voted RDEL and £23.9 million in respect of CDEL. This represents just under 2% of the available DEL budget. The underspends result from the nature of the Depar tment's work which can result in changes to spending plans based on the speed at which programmes are initiated and progress. 

 
A fur ther underspend of £122.5 million was recorded against the AME voted estimate. This resulted from a lower than expected provision for DFID's commitments in respect of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) programme. The UK has pledged to make payments to meet a share of liabilities related to bonds issued to finance vaccine programmes. The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position includes a provision in respect of the UK's share of liabilities related to bonds issued by IFFIm. The provision required at the end of the year was lower than expected due to the value of bonds issued and movements in exchange rates and, as a result the cost, recorded in the accounts was below estimate. A reconciliation of net resource expenditure between estimate, budget and outturn is presented at Note SOPS3. 

## Operating Costs

Managing growth in its programme budgets whilst achieving significant savings against administration costs is a key challenge for the Depar tment. Within total operating costs, core administration costs are reducing by 33% over the current spending review period, with front line costs growing such that total operating costs remain relatively constant. Administration costs reduced by £11.8 million (9%) compared with 2012–13.   

## Capital Expenditure And Consolidated Statement Of Financial Position Movements

 
- Non-current assets 
-  Financial assets increased by £111.2 million to £6,229 million at the end of the year (31 March 
2013 restated: £6,118 million). The movement reflects investment additions of £64.3 million related to International Financial Institutions and other Programme Capital Investments and total revaluations of £46.9 million. The value of investments in IFIs reduced by £73.7 million overall, reflecting unrealised exchange rate losses of £211 million, resulting from unfavourable movements between sterling and the US Dollar, offset by increases in the value of underlying assets. The fair value of DFID's interest in CDC increased by £120.9 million over the year. The value of DFID's investment in CDC was repor 
ted at historical cost in previous years but is now 
stated at fair value as a result of the change in accounting policy explained at note 11 to the financial statements. 
-  The movement in fixed assets over the course of the year was not significant, with tangible 
assets reducing by £2.7 million and intangible assets by £0.9 million due to a moderate level of asset additions and replacements offset by depreciation. 
 
- Current assets 
 
-  Trade and other receivables due within 1 year increased by £13.4 million to £138.0 million at 31 
March 2014 due principally to movements in amounts due to/from HM Treasury in respect of funding for DFID expenditure offset by an increase in prepayments made to single donor trust funds. 
 
- Current liabilities 
-  Trade and Other Payables increased by £865.2 million due largely to an increase of £766 million 
in the value of promissory notes deposited in line with planned deposit schedules but not yet encashed at the Statement of Financial Position date. 
-  Provisions payable within one year increased by £32.6 million compared with the previous 
financial year end as a result of the timing of planned payments to IFFIm and the Advance Market Commitment (AMC) programme, reflecting the status of these programmes. 
 
- Non-current liabilities 
 
-  Provisions payable after more than one year reduced by £34.2 million, reflecting the timing of 
planned payments as mentioned above. 
-  Other payables of £45.0 million in the Statement of Financial Position at 31 March 2013 related 
to a finance lease in respect of a proper 
ty held by the Depar 
tment. The lease expires in July 
2014 and, as a result, the liability is now recorded within current liabilities. 

## 6.1.6 Remote Contingent Liabilities

In addition to contingent liabilities disclosed in accordance with International Accounting Standard 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Assets, note 16 to these accounts discloses cer tain contingent liabilities where the likelihood of a transfer of economic benefit is remote for parliamentary repor ting and accountability purposes. 

## 6.1.7 Future Development

DFID continues to improve its systems and processes to analyse results more effectively, aiming to improve the effectiveness of aid and to increase the efficiency of administration processes. DFID will continue to set its budget and strategy towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals and meeting the ODA/GNI targets set out by the Government. Fur ther information on the trends and factors likely to improve future development are set out in Chapter 5 of this Repor t. Information on DFID policy priorities including humanitarian responses, our work across private sectors and future development post 2015 are set out in Chapter 1. Details on current programme management and its impact on future development are set out in Chapter 2. 

## 6.1.8 Strategy For Sustainability

Climate change is already affecting the world's poorest countries - from increased frequency and severity of flooding in Bangladesh to changing rainfall patterns across Africa, bringing drought and crop failure to countries like Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia.  International suppor t is needed to help communities adapt to the impacts of climate change and to help countries develop infrastructure that suppor ts growth and withstands future climate instability. 

DFID is committed to addressing both the causes and likely effects of climate change so that progress in tackling pover ty continues. This includes ensuring that DFID is 'climate smar t'. Being climate smar t means both ensuring that all of DFID's development policies and programmes are climate-proofed, and also that our UK and international operations are sustainable. 

DFID has a Carbon Management Plan (endorsed by the Carbon Trust) which sets out actions to reduce our operational carbon emissions up until 2015. Actions to date include reducing emissions through data server and printer rationalisation projects, estate rationalisation, and a biomass boiler and green roof at our site in East Kilbride, Scotland. We have also extended the Greening Government Commitments (GGC's) to our overseas estate and international travel on a per head basis, and teams across DFID have examined ways of reducing emissions and saving money as par t of their climate change reviews. We remain firmly on track to meet the GGC target to reduce carbon emissions from energy with a 35% reduction against the baseline. The latest decrease in carbon is par tly due to DFID vacating our previous London premises during the year. In the longer term the disposal of our Palace Street premises and move to a smaller office will result in a continued significant decrease in our emissions. 

## 6.1.8.1 Sustainability Accounting And Reporting

The following section presents more detailed environmental data on our year on year reductions against the GGC baseline and a breakdown of our financial costs. 

## Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Estate/Business Related Transport

DFID has implemented a number of initiatives since the GGC baseline year (2009–10) which has resulted in carbon emissions savings of 46%. In the UK we have moved to a smaller office in London which will reduce our carbon emission savings fur ther. The refurbished Whitehall office has achieved a very good Building Research Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM) rating. In addition, any future construction or refurbishment of overseas premises will be subject to a BREEAM assessment with a target to achieve a 'good' rating or above where practicable. 

## Energy Usage In Kwh Co2 Emissions

| Greenhouse gas emissions    | 2009–10    | 2010–11    | 2011–12    | 2012–13    | 2013–14    |
|-----------------------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|
| Total gross                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| emissions                   | 3,860      | 3,409      | 2,690      | 2,803      | 2,055      |
| Gross                       |            |            |            |            |            |
| emissions                   |            |            |            |            |            |
| Scope 1                     |            |            |            |            |            |
| (direct)                    | 654        | 454        | 255        | 350        | 155        |
| Non-financial               |            |            |            |            |            |
| indicators                  |            |            |            |            |            |
| (tCO )                      |            |            |            |            |            |
| 2                           |            |            |            |            |            |
| Gross                       |            |            |            |            |            |
| emissions                   |            |            |            |            |            |
| Scope 2 and                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| 3 (indirect)                | 3,206      | 2,955      | 2,435      | 2,453      | 1,900      |
| Electricity:                |            |            |            |            |            |
| Non­                         |            |            |            |            |            |
| renewable                   | 5,930      | 5,455      | 4,121      | 3,959      | 3,712      |
| Electricity:                |            |            |            |            |            |
| Renewable                   | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| Related                     |            |            |            |            |            |
| energy                      |            |            |            |            |            |
| consumption                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| (000 Kwh)                   | Gas        | 3,564      | 2,464      | 1,485      |            |
| LPG                         | -          | -          | -          | -          | -          |
| Other                       | -          | -          | -          | -          | 105        |
| Expenditure                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| on energy                   | 479        | 550        | 513        | 604        | 468        |
| CRC licence                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| expenditure                 | -          | -          | -          | -          | -          |
| Financial                   |            |            |            |            |            |
| indicators                  |            |            |            |            |            |
| (£000)                      |            |            |            |            |            |
| Expenditure                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| on accredited               |            |            |            |            |            |
| offsets                     | 303        | 121        | 180        | 160        | 53         |
| Expenditure                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| on official                 |            |            |            |            |            |
| business                    |            |            |            |            |            |
| travel                      | 4,437      | 3,938      | 4,050      | 5,611      | 6,418      |

## Travel Related Emissions

Since the 2009–10 baseline, DFID has recorded the following emissions from domestic air miles (business related travel): 

## Domestic Travel Flights

| 2009–10               | 2010–11    | 2011–12    | 2012–13    | 2013–14    |
|-----------------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|
| Miles                 | Carbon     | Miles      | Carbon     |            |
| UK domestic air miles | 496        | 1.5m       | 463        | 1.35m      |

DFID domestic flights have increased by 18% against the 2009–10 baseline. This is due largely to the relocation of a number of programme and policy posts from London and growth in staff numbers in our East Kilbride office. DFID has also now developed a new air miles tracker system which will allow Heads of Depar tments and individuals to monitor and manage staff air miles more systematically
. The system will be fur ther developed to include a progress tracker against the GGC target. We are also developing an online tool which will enable staff to volunteer their personal air miles information to other members of DFID staff. Although the GGC does not include international travel, DFID has agreed internal targets to reduce carbon emissions from international air travel in line with the requirements of the GGC targets (see section on promoting sustainable development below for fur ther information on progress towards our overseas targets). 

| -     | -      | -     |
|-------|--------|-------|
| 1,891 | 844    |       |
| Miles | Carbon | Miles |
| 410   | 1.34m  | 356   |

## Reduce Waste

The Greening Government Commitment is to reduce the amount of waste we generate by 25% by 2015, against the 2009–2010 baseline. By the end of 2013–14 DFID was down 33% against the 2009–10 figure. 

 
 
Although there is not a GGC target for recycling rates, DFID has set an internal target of recycling at least 75% of waste. DFID achieved 64% in 2013–14 and hope to improve fur ther by the recent introduction of food waste recycling and better signage on our waste bins. In terms of the 2013–14 total of 214 tonnes shown in the table below, 138 tonnes (64%) was recycled, 70 tonnes (33%) was incinerated with energy recovery (Refuse Derived Fuel) and 6 tonnes (3%) was sent to landfill. 

## Waste Reducing Water Consumption

DFID currently demonstrates 'good practice' for water consumption as defined under the Greening Government Commitments for water. Water usage decreased in 2013–14 by 37% compared to 2012–13, largely due to the disposal of our second London building. We are currently carrying out an environmental review of the new Whitehall office to identify future oppor tunities for saving water. 

DFID does not own water reserves in lakes, reservoirs or boreholes so water usage is classified as Scope 2 only. In terms of expenditure on water in 2013–14, this was £16,547, a reduction of 26% on 2009–10. 

## Water (Scope 2 Only) Water Usage (Cubic Metres)

ar char t.

## 6.1.8.2 Sustainable Procurement

DFID has a sustainable procurement strategy which aligns with the latest GGC requirements: 

 
- Supplier engagement - targeting corporate suppliers to promote continual sustainability 
improvement including incentives for suppliers where possible and ensuring compliance with Government sourcing policies. 
 
- Policy, strategy and communications - the revised sustainable procurement strategy includes 
sourcing strategies for key corporate requirements; supplier engagement; training; measurable objectives; risks and a review schedule. 
The Depar tment of Energy and Climate Change recently issued new sustainable procurement repor ting requirements. DFID will put measures in place to ensure it continues to make strong progress towards these targets. 

## 6.1.8.3 Future Projects

Though many of the most beneficial and cost-effective building improvements have been made, we are continuing to investigate and implement a number of energy efficiency measures in both East Kilbride and London. Projects which contributed to fur ther improvements during 2013–14 included: 

 
- Operating our new biomass boiler which reduced gas usage in our East Kilbride office by 27% - Replacement of local heating/cooling equipment in our London office with more energy efficient units 


- Roll out of new laptops using 50% less power than previous models 
 
- Implementation of a vir 
tual desktop infrastructure and PCs which use 60% less power 
 
- Improvements to the general fabric of our East Kilbride office. 
The DFID Carbon Management Plan outlines existing energy saving projects and plans for future projects such as the review of the East Kilbride lighting system. 

## 6.1.8.4 Promoting Sustainable Development Overseas

DFID is committed to integrating climate and environment concerns into all of its development aid under its Climate Smar t Business plan commitment. This committed DFID to address climate change risks and oppor tunities across the Depar tment by the end of 2013. 

The Climate Smar t programme is delivered through Strategic Programme Reviews (SPR), carried out by each DFID business unit overseas and in the UK. The SPR includes four areas of action on demonstrating leadership: raising awareness; reducing the environmental impact of DFID operations; analysing climate risks; and oppor tunities in DFID programmes. For example, in Bangladesh, the SPR has helped to deliver a 16% reduction in carbon emissions from DFID's estate since 2009–10; initiated the establishment of a more robust national climate finance mechanism, the Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund; and has led to climate resilience being designed into programmes, such as adapting primary schools in vulnerable areas of Bangladesh to double as cyclone shelters. DFID recognises that our overseas estate is a significant par t of our carbon footprint and last year we extended the GGC targets to reduce carbon emissions from our country offices on a per head basis. We are monitoring emissions across all of our overseas estates, and are taking measures to improve data collection. Many country offices are making strong progress in reducing emissions, such as India, Bangladesh and Ethiopia. There is significant scope to harness these ideas and reduce our overseas footprint across the board. We are still in the process of collecting 13–14 data from our Overseas Offices and this will be posted on our website as soon as it is available. 

## 6.1.8.5 Biodiversity And Natural Environment

DFID does not have any Sites of Specific Scientific interest.  

## 6.1.8.6 Procurement Of Food And Catering Services

 
An integral par t of the DFID facilities management contract is to ensure that the procurement of all food meets UK or equivalent production standards, and aims to reduce the environmental impacts of food and catering ser vices and suppor t a healthy balanced diet. 

## 6.1.9 Equality And Diversity

DFID is committed to creating an inclusive working environment to maximise the potential of all staff, providing equal oppor tunities in all aspects of employment and avoiding unlawful discrimination or bullying and harassment at work. DFID is accredited under the Disability Two Ticks Scheme, which guarantees an interview for suitable applicants with disabilities. DFID's Equality Framework explains how equality and diversity can make improvements in practices and so suppor t the Depar tment's vision and priorities. The framework provides an approach for DFID 
to carry out equality and diversity, both for service delivery (a generic term used to cover the programme, policy, advisory and developmental roles DFID under takes) and for employment practices. In line with the framework and the Equality Act 2010, DFID has published information to show how it is implementing equality and diversity at home and overseas at https://www.gov
.uk/government/ 
publications/dfid-staff-repor t-on-equality-and-diversity-for-2011. In par ticular, we have published our 
5 equality objectives, our equality and diversity repor t and our depar tmental staff repor t. DFID is actively using these to gain a comprehensive picture of progress on equality and diversity.  
 
The Act applies to everyone in Great Britain and Nor thern Ireland and to home civil servants based overseas. While it does not apply technically in other countries, DFID applies the general principles of equality and diversity to its overseas offices and has a clear commitment to deliver equality and value diversity in all that is done, while allowing for the fact that practice may vary from office to office to take account of local laws and custom. 

The following table summarises the number of DFID employees by gender as at 31 March 2014 and 31 March 2013. 

|           |            | 31 March 2014    | 31 March 2013    |
|-----------|------------|------------------|------------------|
| Headcount | Percentage | Headcount        | Percentage       |
| Male      |            |                  |                  |
| 906       | 47.38%     | 883              | 48.70%           |
| Female    |            |                  |                  |
| 1,006     | 52.62%     | 930              | 51.30%           |
| Total     | 1,912      | 1,813            |                  |

Total employees at 31 March 2014 includes 37 female and 55 male Senior Civil Ser vants. At the repor ting date, DFID's Depar tmental Board was comprised of 4 female and 8 male board members. 

## 6.1.10 Finance Improvement Plan - 'Finance For All'

DFID continues to make good progress in implementing its Finance Improvement Plan which was launched under the 'Finance for All' strategy in September 2011. In 2013–14 the programme focused predominately on implementing the new Finance Operating Model, the framework through which DFID conducts its financial activities. The new model will create a stronger par tnership between core finance and the rest of the business, a stronger embedded financial management function, and deliver efficiencies through centralising invoice payments in the UK. Detailed proposals for the new model were approved by the Finance Improvement Board in April 2013 and implementation of the new structure is well under way. Fur ther recruitment is ongoing and we expect both structural and efficiency changes to be fully in place during 2014–15. Progress was also made in suppor ting management information initiatives, strengthening the development of finance skills, development in non-finance roles and providing input to the organisational review of programme management. Mark Lowcock Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 

## 6.2 Directors' Report 6.2.1 Corporate Governance



DFID's corporate governance arrangements are set out within the Governance Statement. This sets out the governance framework of the organisation, including information about the Board's committee structure, its attendance records and the coverage of its work. The statement includes the required assessment of compliance with the Corporate Governance Code and provides explanations of any departures. 

## 6.2.2 Risk

DFID's Risk and Control Framework is described in detail within the Governance Statement. This recognises 3 categories of risk: strategic risk, operational risk and project risk. DFID's approach to managing transactional risks such as currency risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and market risk is outlined in note 11 to these accounts. 

## 6.2.3 Senior Management Ministers

DFID is represented in the Cabinet by the Secretary of State for International Development Justine Greening MP
. The Secretary of State is suppor ted in the House of Commons by Minister of State Alan Duncan MP and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Lynne Featherstone MP
. 

## Departmental Board

The Depar tmental Board is responsible for advising on and monitoring implementation of the Depar tment's strategy and policy priorities. 

## Permanent Secretary

The Senior Civil Ser vant in DFID is the Permanent Secretary, Mark Lowcock. 

## Executive Management Committee (Emc)

The EMC is a sub-committee of the Depar tmental Board which is chaired by the Permanent Secretary and which oversees day to day implementation of DFID's strategy and policy priorities. Information on company directorships held by members of the EMC can be obtained from DFID's Public Enquiry Point upon request by email to enquiry@dfid.gov
.uk. 

## Non-Executive Directors (Neds)

NEDs use their experiences and skills from outside DFID to provide objective and constructive challenge on the committee and boards. Details of the composition of the Depar tmental Board, the EMC and associated sub-committees are set out within the Governance Statement in section 6.7. 

## 6.2.4 Health, Safety And Well-Being

DFID is committed to ensuring the health, safety and well-being of its employees and workers, both Home Civil Servants and staff appointed in country. DFID seeks to create a workplace where we not only protect the health, safety and wellbeing of staff but also promote a healthy workforce, maintain safe systems of work and suppor t the physical and emotional wellbeing of staff. 

DFID has a counselling service in the form of an EAP (Employee Assistance Provider) for all staff to access if they need personal suppor t. In addition, DFID offers specialist counselling for staff in hostile environments. DFID's maximising attendance policy helps to ensure that sickness absence is effectively managed and ultimately does not detract from DFID's delivery performance. The aim of this policy and its associated procedures is to ensure that all employees are aware of their responsibilities in maximising attendance, to enable the consistent management of attendance issues, and to underline DFID's commitment to the provision of appropriate employee suppor t. 

This policy applies to all Home Civil Ser vants and staff appointed in country. It does not apply to agency workers, consultants, or any other workers not employed by DFID. The following table summarises sickness absence per full time equivalent days, the basis of the whole of government benchmark, for the calendar year ended 31 December, plus a comparison with the previous calendar year. 

|                                                | 2013    | 2012    |
|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------|
| Working days lost (short term absence)         | 3,207   | 3,501   |
| Working days lost (long term absence)          | 5,582   | 5,395   |
| Total working days lost                        | 8,789   | 8,896   |
| Number of staff absent as a result of sickness | 653     | 687     |

## 6.2.5 Personal Data Losses

No protected personal data-related incidents were repor ted to the Information Commissioner's Office in 2013–14. Owing to the nature of DFID's business and in comparison with many other government depar tments which provide significant citizen-facing services, the Depar tment does not hold large volumes of personal data. DFID does hold a moderate amount of classified information. DFID takes its responsibility for management of all data very seriously. A governance structure compliant with the UK government's Security Policy Framework is in place for information security and risk management. DFID is also independently cer tified as compliant with ISO/IEC 27001:2005, the international standard for information security management systems. DFID has been formally compliant with the standard since 2008 and is committed to maintaining its cer tification in the future. DFID's compliance with the standard is assessed bi-annually which involves physical inspections of UK headquar ters and overseas offices. DFID remains the only ministerial depar tment to hold this cer tification. 

 
The Depar tment has a programme of work to ensure continued compliance with the UK 
government's Security Policy Framework, the Cabinet Office Data Handling Review and ISO/IEC 27001:2005. This includes a training, education and awareness plan to maintain and raise awareness of information security issues across DFID. Directors are responsible for providing assurance on information security in their annual statements of assurance which suppor t this and other elements of the Governance Statement. DFID will continue to monitor and assess its information risks in order to identify and address any weaknesses, and to ensure continuous improvement of its systems. As shown in the table below, there were no incidents which were deemed by the Data Controller not to fall within the criteria for repor t to the Information Commissioner's Office but recorded centrally within the Depar tment. Small, localised incidents are not recorded centrally and are not cited in these figures. 

| Category                                                 | Nature of incident      | Total    |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|----------|
| 2013–14                                                  |                         |          |
| Total                                                    |                         |          |
| 2012–13                                                  |                         |          |
| -                                                        | -                       | I        |
| paper documents from secured Government premises         |                         |          |
| -                                                        | -                       | II       |
| paper documents from outside secured Government premises |                         |          |
| -                                                        | -                       | III      |
| equipment, devices or paper documents                    |                         |          |
| IV                                                       | Unauthorised disclosure | -        |
| V                                                        | Other                   | -        |

## 6.2.6 Employee Engagement

DFID promotes employee engagement at all levels across the world. DFID operates within an open and honest environment to encourage staff to feed back their views both formally and informally. Staff are given the oppor tunity to contribute their views formally through an annual staffing sur vey, the results of which are reviewed by senior management, heads of depar tment and line managers. 

Action is taken to address findings, where appropriate. During the year, staff are kept up to date with strategy development, priorities and financial performance through a variety of channels, such as all-staff meetings, use of the intranet and sharing of board minutes summarising key developments within the organisation. Staff are encouraged to obser ve high-level meetings across the organisation such as the Audit Committee and the Executive Management Committee. In addition, DFID has a team dedicated to employee engagement to ensure that all staff receive the most impor tant messages that affect them and their work, and that they have a chance to have their say on changes. Informally, staff can provide feedback through channels such as depar tmental meetings, blogs and other means of knowledge sharing. 

 
DFID makes extensive use of new media in order to engage with staff, such as bringing together staff across the organisation through the use of video conferencing. This assists with overcoming the geographical and logistical barriers to effective employee engagement. 

## 6.3 Events After The Reporting Date

DFID's Annual Repor t and Accounts are laid before the Houses of Parliament by HM Treasury. The Accounting Officer authorised these financial statements for issue on the same date that the Comptroller and Auditor General signed his cer tificate. 

## 6.3.1 Non-Adjusting Events After The Reporting Date

No non-adjusting events after the repor ting date have been identified. 

## 6.4 Auditors

These accounts are audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General. The auditors have been provided with all information identified as relevant to the audit. As Accounting Officer I have taken all the steps appropriate to ensure that I am aware of relevant audit information and to establish that the entity's auditors are aware of the information. Mark Lowcock Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 

## 6.5 Remuneration Report Remuneration Policy

The remuneration of senior civil servants is set by the Prime Minister following independent advice from the Review Body on Senior Salaries. The Review Body also advises the Prime Minister from time to time on the pay and pensions of MPs and their allowances; on peers' allowances; and on the pay, pensions and allowances of ministers and others whose pay is determined by the Ministerial and Other Salaries Act 1975. In reaching its recommendations, the Review Body has regard to the following considerations: 

 
- the need to recruit, retain and motivate suitably able and qualified people to exercise their different 
responsibilities 
- regional/local variations in labour markets and their effects on the recruitment and retention of staff 


- government policies for improving the public ser 
vices, including the requirement on depar 
tments 
to meet the output targets for the delivery of depar 
tmental services 
 
- the funds available to depar 
tments as set out in the government's DELs 
 
- the government's inflation target 
The Review Body takes account of the evidence it receives about wider economic considerations and the affordability of its recommendations. Fur ther information about the work of the Review Body can be found at www.ome.uk.com 
 
In line with the Coalition government's transparency commitments, DFID is now publishing salary details of its senior civil servants, in the format agreed with Cabinet Office, on the government's website www.gov
.uk 

## Service Contracts

The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 requires Civil Service appointments to be made on merit on the basis of fair and open competition. The Recruitment Principles published by the Civil Service Commission specify the circumstances when appointments may be made otherwise. Unless otherwise stated below, the officials covered by this repor t hold appointments which are open-ended. Early termination, other than for misconduct, would result in the individual receiving compensation as set out in the Civil Ser vice Compensation Scheme. 

Fur ther information about the work of the Civil Ser vice Commission can be found at  
www.civilser vicecommission.org.uk 

## Salary And Pension Entitlements (This Information Has Been Audited)

The following sections provide details of the remuneration and pension interests of the ministers and the permanent members of the Executive Management Committee (EMC). 

## Remuneration (Salary, Benefits In Kind And Pensions)

Ministers 
Salary 
£ 
Benefits in kind 
(to nearest £100) 
2013–14 
2012–13 
2013–14 
2012–13 
2013–14 
2012–13 
2013–14 
2012–13 
 
 
Justine Greening 
Secretary of State 
68,169 
[2] 
34,413 
- 
- 
25,000 
11,000 
93,000 
45,000 
 
Alan Duncan 
 Minister of State 
32,344 
[3] 
33,002 
- 
- 
12,000 
12,000 
44,000 
45,000 
Lynne Featherstone 
Parliamentary Under 
23,039 
[4] 
11,849 
- 
- 
8,000 
4,000 
31,000 
16,000 
 
Secretary of State 

[1] The value of pension benefits accrued during the year is calculated as (the real increase in pension multiplied by 20) less (the contributions made by the individual). The real increase excludes increases due to inflation or any increase or decrease due to a transfer of pension rights. [2] £68,169 (full year equivalent) and £79,754 (entitled salary) (2012-13: £68,827 (full year equivalent) and £79,754 (entitled salary)) [3] £32,344 (full year equivalent) and £41,370 (entitled salary) (2012-13: £33,002 (full year equivalent) and £41,370 (entitled salary)) [4] £23,039 (full year equivalent) and £31,401 (entitled salary) (2012-13: £23,697 (full year equivalent) and £31,401 (entitled salary)) 

Total (to nearest  
£1,000) 
Pension benefits (to 
nearest £1,000) (to 
nearest £1,000)[1] 
EMC members 
Salary 
(£000) 
Bonus payments 
(£000) 
2013–14 
2012–13 2013–14 2012–13 2013–14 2012–13 2013–14 2012–13 2013–14 
2012–13 
160–165 155–160 
15–20 
- 
- 
- 
15,000 
22,000 
190–195 
180–185 
Mark Lowcock 
Permanent 
Secretary 
120–125 
10–15 
Richard Calvert 
Director General 
125–130 
10–15 
- 
- 
8,000 
9,000 
145–150 
145–150 
115–120 
- 
Joy Hutcheon 
Director General 
120–125 
- 
- 
- 
14,000 
72,000 
130–135 
190–195 
115–120 
- 
- 
- 
12,000 
45,000 
60–65 
165–170 
- 
Michael Anderson 
Director General 
(to 31/8/13) 
50–55 
(120–125 full 
year 
equivalent)[2] 
115–120 
- 
- 
- 
9,000 145,000 
85–90 
265–270 
- 
Mark Bowman 
Director General 
(to 30/11/13) 
75–80 
(120–125 full 
year 
equivalent)[3] 
- 
- 
- 
9,000 
- 
35–40 
- 
- 
- 
Moazzam Malik 
Director General 
(from1/11/13 
to 31/1/14) 
25–30 
(100–105 full 
year 
equivalent)[4] 
Nick Dyer Director 
General (from 
1/8/13) 
- 
- 
- 
80,000 
- 
150–155 
- 
- 
- 
70–75 
(110–115 full 
year 
equivalent)[5] 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
David Kennedy 
Director General 
(from 16/6/14) 
–(125–130 
full year 
equivalent) 

[1] The value of pension benefits accrued during the year is calculated as (the real increase in pension multiplied by 20) plus (the real increase in any lump sum) less (the contributions made by the individual). The real increases exclude increases due to inflation or any increase or decreases due to a transfer of pension rights. [2] Resigned from DFID with effect from 31/8/13 [3] Transferred to HMT with effect from 18/11/13, paid by DFID until 30/11/13 [4] On temporary promotion from 1/11/13 to 31/1/14. Transferred on loan to FCO with effect from 31/1/14 [5] On temporary promotion from 1/8/13 to 3/11/13 and subsequently promoted on 4/11/13 

## Salary

'Salary' includes gross salary; over time; reserved rights to London weighting or London allowances; 
recruitment and retention allowances; private office allowances and any other allowance to the extent that it is subject to UK taxation. During 2013–14, the following fees and taxable expenses were paid to non-executive members of the Board: 

 
- Vivienne Cox - £20,000 
 
- Richard Keys - £20,466 
 
- Tim Robinson - nil (£15,000 entitled salary) 
 
- Eric Salama - nil (£15,000 entitled salary) 

Pension benefits 
(to nearest £1,000) 
Total 
(£000) 
Benefits in kind 
(to nearest £100) 
[1] 
 

This repor t is based on accrued payments made by the Depar tment and thus recorded in these accounts. In respect of ministers in the House of Commons, depar tments bear only the cost of the additional ministerial remuneration; the salary for their ser vices as an MP (£65,738 from 1 April 2010, 
£66,396 from 1 April 2013) and various allowances to which they are entitled are borne centrally. The following table summarises the number of Senior Civil Ser vice (SCS) staff by pay band as at 
31 March 2014 and 31 March 2013. 

| SCS Pay Band    |   31 March 2014 (Headcount)  |   31 March 2013 (Headcount)  |
|-----------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|
| 1               |                          66  |                          63  |
| 2               |                          14  |                          14  |
| 3               |                           3  |                           4  |
| Perm Sec        |                           1  |                           1  |
| TOTAL           |                          84  |                          82  |

## Benefits In Kind

The monetary value of benefits in kind covers any benefits provided by the Depar tment and treated by HM Revenue and Customs as a taxable emolument. No benefits in kind were provided in 2013–14. 

## Bonuses

 
All SCS staff are required to use their objectives to capture their contribution to the achievement of DFID's Business Plan, as well as what they will do to leverage progress in achieving DFID's Organisational Vision and Improvement Plan. DFID's system for SCS performance management is based on the Cabinet Office's guidance on SCS performance objectives. This guidance states that each member of the SCS must have at least one objective under each of the following headings: 

 
- Business delivery 
 
- Finance/efficiency 
 
- People/capability 
 
- Corporate leadership 
All SCS must also give consideration to setting objectives that: 

 
- capture their role in fostering an ethos of volunteering across their team, unit or depar 
tment; 
 
- incorporate diversity by embedding it in business, finance/efficiency or people/capability 
objectives; 
 
- contribute a propor 
tion of their time to their wider depar 
tment/agency, and the Civil Ser 
vice as a 
whole.  

## Delegated Grade Performance

DFID has adopted a best practice performance management framework developed by the Civil Service Employee Policy for use across Government. Objectives are set in discussion with individual line managers at the beginning of the performance year (April) and monitored throughout the year. At the end of the performance year employees are given a 'box marking' to indicate if they have met or exceeded their objectives or to indicate that they must improve. Bonuses are based on performance levels attained and are made as par t of the appraisal process. 

The bonuses repor ted in 2013–14 relate to performance in 2012–13 and the comparative bonuses repor ted for 2012–13 relate to the performance in 2011–12. 

## Pay Multiples

Repor ting bodies are required to disclose the relationship between the remuneration of the highest paid director in their organisation and the median remuneration of the organisation's workforce. The banded remuneration of the highest-paid member of the EMC in DFID in the financial year 
2013–14 was £175,000–£180,000 (2012–13: £160,000–165,000). This was 3.4 times (2012–13: 2.9) the median remuneration of the workforce, which was £52,901 (2012–13: £54,550). In 2013–14 and 2012–13, no employees received remuneration in excess of the highest-paid member of the EMC. Remuneration ranged from £16,000–£180,000 (2012–13: £15,000–£165,000). Total remuneration includes salary, non-consolidated performance-related pay and benefits in kind as well as severance payments. It does not include employer pension contributions and the cash equivalent transfer value of pensions. 

## Pension Benefits Ministerial Pensions

|                               |       |
|-------------------------------|-------|
| Minister                      |       |
|                               |       |
|                               |       |
|                               |       |
| Accrued                       |       |
| pension at age                |       |
| 65 as at 31/3/14              |       |
| CETV at                       |       |
| 31/3/14                       |       |
| CETV at                       |       |
| 31/3/13                       |       |
| Real                          |       |
| increase in                   |       |
| CETV                          |       |
| Real                          |       |
| increase in                   |       |
| pension at                    |       |
| age 65                        |       |
| £000                          | £000  |
|                               | 5–10  |
| Secretary of  State           |       |
|                               | 0–5   |
| Minister of  State            |       |
| 0–5                           | 0–2.5 |
|                               |       |
| Lynne Featherstone            |       |
| Parliamentary Under Secretary |       |
| of  State                     |       |

 
 
Pension benefits for ministers are provided by the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund (PCPF). The scheme is made under statute (the regulations are set out in Statutory Instrument SI 1993 No 3253, as amended). Those ministers who are Members of Parliament may also accrue an MP's pension under the PCPF (details of which are not included in this repor t). The accrual rate has been 1/40th since 15 July 2002 
(or 5 July 2001 for those that chose to backdate the change) but ministers, in common with all other members of the PCPF
, can opt for a 1/50th accrual rate and a lower rate of member contribution. An additional 1/60th accrual rate option (backdated to 1 April 2008) was introduced from 1 January 2010. Benefits for ministers are payable at the same time as MPs' benefits become payable under the PCPF or, for those who are not MPs, on retirement from ministerial office from age 65.  Pensions are revalued annually in line with pensions increase legislation. From 1 April 2013 members paid contributions between 7.9% and 16.7% depending on their level of seniority and chosen accrual rate. The contribution rates will increase from April 2014. The accrued pension quoted is the pension the minister is entitled to receive when they reach 65, or immediately on ceasing to be an active member of the scheme if they are already 65. In line with reforms to other public service pension schemes, it is intended to reform the Ministerial Pension Scheme in 2015. 

## The Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (Cetv)

This is the actuarially assessed capitalised value of the pension scheme benefits accrued by a member at a par ticular point in time. The benefits valued are the member's accrued benefits and any contingent spouse's pension payable from the scheme. A CETV is a payment made by a pension scheme or arrangement to secure pension benefits in another pension scheme or arrangement when the member leaves a scheme and chooses to transfer the pension benefits they have accrued in their former scheme. 

The pension figures shown relate to the benefits that the individual has accrued as a consequence of their total ministerial ser vice, not just their current appointment as a minister. CETVs are calculated in accordance with The Occupational Pension Schemes (Transfer Values) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 and do not take account of any actual or potential reduction to benefits resulting from Lifetime Allowance Tax which may be due when pension benefits are taken. 

## The Real Increase In The Value Of The Cetv

This is the element of the increase in accrued pension funded by the Exchequer. It excludes increases due to inflation and contributions paid by the minister. It is worked out using common market valuation factors for the star t and end of the period. 

## Civil Service Pensions

| EMC members         | Accrued pension at    |
|---------------------|-----------------------|
| pension age as at   |                       |
| 31/3/14 and related |                       |
| lump sum            |                       |
| Real increase       |                       |
| in pension and      |                       |
| related lump sum    |                       |
| at pension age      |                       |
| £000                | £000                  |
| 55–60 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 165–170      |                       |
| 0–2.5 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 2.5–5        |                       |
| Mark Lowcock        |                       |
| Permanent           |                       |
| Secretary           |                       |
| Richard Calvert     |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| 45–50 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 140–145      |                       |
| 0–2.5 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 0–2.5        |                       |
| Joy Hutcheon        |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| 35–40 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 115–120      |                       |
| 0–2.5 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 2.5–5        |                       |
| 20–25               | 0–2.5                 |
| Director General    |                       |
| (to 31/8/13)        |                       |
| 25–30 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 85–90        |                       |
| 0–2.5 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 2.5–5        |                       |
| Mark Bowman         |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| (to 30/11/13)       |                       |
| Moazzam Malik       |                       |
| 15–20 plus lump     | 0–2.5 plus lump       |
| sum of 50–55        | sum of 0–2.5          |
|                     |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| (temporary          |                       |
| promotion from      |                       |
| 1/11/13 to 31/1/14) |                       |
| 35–40 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 115–120      |                       |
| 2.5–5 plus lump     |                       |
| sum of 10–12.5      |                       |
|                     |                       |
| Nick Dyer           |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| (from 1/8/13)       |                       |
| -                   | -                     |
|                     |                       |
| David Kennedy       |                       |
| Director General    |                       |
| (from 16/6/14)      |                       |

[1] The CETV at 31 March 2013 quoted in the 2012-13 Annual Accounts for Mark Bowman was incorrectly recorded as 388 
Pension benefits are provided through the Civil Ser vice pension arrangements. From 30 July 2007, civil ser vants may be in one of four defined benefit schemes: either a final salary scheme (**classic**, premium or **classic plus**): or a whole career scheme (**nuvos**). These statutory arrangements are unfunded with the cost of benefits met by monies voted by Parliament each year. Pensions payable under classic, premium, **classic plus** and **nuvos** are increased annually in line with pensions increase legislation. Members joining from October 2002 may opt for either the appropriate defined benefit arrangement or a 'money purchase' stakeholder pension with an employer contribution 
(**partnership** pension account). 

Employee contributions are salary-related and range between 1.5% and 6.25% of pensionable earnings for **classic** and 3.5% and 8.25% for premium, **classic plus** and **nuvos**. Increases to employee contributions will apply from 1 April 2014. Benefits in **classic** accrue at the rate of 1/80th of final pensionable earnings for each year of service. In addition, a lump sum equivalent to 3 years' 
 



CETV at 
31/3/14 
CETV at 
31/3/13 
Real 
increase 
in CETV 
Employer 
contribution 
to partnership 
pension account 
995 
924 
9 
- 
872 
813 
4 
- 
642 
587 
6 
- 
418 
338 [1] 
7 
- 
668 
573 
58 
- 

 
 
initial pension is payable on retirement. For **premium**, benefits accrue at the rate of 1/60th of final pensionable earnings for each year of service. Unlike **classic**, there is no automatic lump sum. Classic plus is essentially a hybrid with benefits for ser vice before 1 October 2002 calculated broadly as per **classic** and benefits for service from October 2002 worked out as in **premium**. In nuvos a member builds up a pension based on their pensionable earnings during their period of scheme membership. At the end of the scheme year (31 March) the member's earned pension account is credited with 2.3% of their pensionable earnings in that scheme year and the accrued pension is uprated in line with pensions increase legislation. In all cases members may opt to give up (commute) pension for a lump sum up to the limits set by the Finance Act 2004. 

The **partnership** pension account is a stakeholder pension arrangement. The employer makes a basic contribution of between 3% and 12.5% (depending on the age of the member) into a stakeholder pension product chosen by the employee from a panel of three providers. The employee does not have to contribute, but where they do make contributions, the employer will match these up to a limit of 3% of pensionable salary (in addition to the employer's basic contribution). Employers also contribute a fur ther 0.8% of pensionable salary to cover the cost of centrally-provided risk benefit cover (death in service and ill health retirement). The accrued pension quoted is the pension the member is entitled to receive when they reach pension age, or immediately on ceasing to be an active member of the scheme if they are already at or over pension age. Pension age is 60 for members of classic, **premium** and **classic plus** and 65 for members of **nuvos**. 



Fur ther details about the Civil Ser vice pension arrangements can be found at the website  
www.civilser vice.gov
.uk/pensions 
 

## Reporting Of Civil Service And Other Compensation Schemes - Exit Packages

Comparative data shown in brackets for previous calendar year 

| Core Department    | Agencies     | Departmental Group    |
|--------------------|--------------|-----------------------|
| Total              |              |                       |
| number             |              |                       |
| Number of          |              |                       |
| of exit            |              |                       |
|                    |              |                       |
|                    | compulsory   |                       |
|                    |              |                       |
|                    |              |                       |
|                    | packages     |                       |
| Exit               |              |                       |
| package            |              |                       |
| cost band          | redundancies |                       |
| Number of          |              |                       |
| compulsory         |              |                       |
| redundancies       |              |                       |
| Number             |              |                       |
| of other           |              |                       |
| departures         |              |                       |
| agreed             | by cost      |                       |
| band               |              |                       |
| <£10,000           |              |                       |
| 1(–)               | 1(–)         | 2(–)                  |
| £10,000–           |              |                       |
| £25,000            |              |                       |
| - (–)              | 4(2)         | 4(3)                  |
| £25,000–           |              |                       |
| £50,000            |              |                       |
| - (–)              | 7(1)         | 7(1)                  |
| £50,000–           |              |                       |
| £100,000           |              |                       |
| - (–)              | 5(2)         | 5(2)                  |
| £100,000–          |              |                       |
| £150,000           |              |                       |
| - (–)              | 4(2)         | 4(2)                  |
| £150,000–          |              |                       |
| £200,000           |              |                       |
| - (–)              | 1(2)         | 1(2)                  |
| 1(1)               | 22(9)        | 23(10)                |
| Total              |              |                       |
| number of          |              |                       |
| exit               |              |                       |
| packages           |              |                       |
|                    | Total cost   |                       |
| (£000)             |              |                       |
| 1,294 (836)        | 1,294 (836)  |                       |

Redundancy and other departure costs have been paid in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, a statutory scheme made under the Superannuation Act 1972. Exit costs are accounted for in full in the year of depar ture. Where the department has agreed early retirements, the additional costs are met by the depar tment and not by the Civil Service pension scheme. 

Ill-health retirement costs are met by the pension scheme and are not included in the table. 

 

|              |            | Total    |     |
|--------------|------------|----------|-----|
| Number       |            | number   |     |
| Number of    |            |          |     |
| of other     |            | of exit  |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              | compulsory |          |     |
| departures   |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              | packages   |          |     |
| redundancies |            |          |     |
| agreed       |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
| Number       |            |          |     |
| of other     |            |          |     |
| departures   |            |          |     |
| agreed       | by cost    |          |     |
| Total        |            |          |     |
| number       |            |          |     |
| of exit      |            |          |     |
| packages     |            |          |     |
| by cost      |            |          |     |
| band         | band       |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |
|              |            |          |     |

## Off-Payroll Engagements

The table below provides information on the number of off-payroll engagements, or those that reached 6 months in duration between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014 at a cost of £220 per day and that existed for longer than 6 months. The number relates to engagements within DFID and entities within its repor ting boundary, but does not include public corporations. 

| Department                                         | Agencies    | ALBs    |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------|---------|
| 4                                                  | -           | -       |
| Number of new engagements, or those that           |             |         |
| reached 6 months in duration, between 1 April 2013 |             |         |
| and 31 March 2014                                  |             |         |
| 2                                                  | -           | -       |
| clauses giving the department the right to request |             |         |
| assurance in relation to income tax and National   |             |         |
| Insurance obligations                              |             |         |
| Number for whom assurance has been requested       | 2           | -       |
| Of which.                                          |             |         |
| Number for whom assurance has been received        | 2           | -       |
| Number for whom assurance has not been received    | -           | -       |
| -                                                  | -           | -       |
|                                                    |             |         |
| Number that have been terminated as a result of    |             |         |
| assurance not being received.                      |             |         |

 
The table below provides information on the number of off-payroll engagements of board members and/ or senior officials with significant financial responsibility, between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014. 

|                                                    | Main department    | Agencies    | ALBs                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| -                                                  | -                  | -           | Number of off-payroll engagements of board        |
| members, and/or, senior officials with significant |                    |             |                                                   |
| financial responsibility                           |                    |             |                                                   |
| 7                                                  | -                  | -           | Number of individuals that have been deemed board |
| members, and/or, senior officials with significant |                    |             |                                                   |
| financial responsibility                           |                    |             |                                                   |

On 31 March 2014, DFID had a total of 3 off-payroll appointments with self-employed contractors earning more than £220 per day. One of these arrangements had been in place for less than 1 year on the repor ting date and 2 had been in place for between 1 and 2 years. All of DFID's off-payroll appointments are made in accordance with Human Resources and Procurement Policies designed to manage the risk of non-compliance with applicable tax regulations. 

Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 

## 6.6 Public Interest And Other Matters 6.6.1 Payment Of Suppliers

In accordance with the Prompt Payment Initiative, DFID aims to pay 80% of all valid undisputed invoices within 5 days of receipt. DFID aims to settle the remainder of all valid undisputed invoices within 10 days of receipt. During the year ended 31 March 2014, 82.93% of valid invoices were paid within 5 days of receipt (2012–13: 87.75%). The Depar tment will continue to review its operating practices and systems with a view to re-engineer processes and increase efficiency. This includes improvements in prompt payment of invoices. No amounts were paid in relation to late interest. The trade payable outstanding at 31 March 2014 as a propor tion of DFID total purchases from suppliers during the year was equivalent to 1 day's trading (2012–13: 1 day). 

## 6.6.2 Transparency

DFID has 2 main transparency initiatives: 

 
- UK Government Transparency Drive, which is the promise to the UK taxpayer to make information 
about depar 
tmental spend, contracts and staffing across all government depar 
tments more open 
and clear. DFID is committed to publishing every financial transaction above £500 for both programme and administration spend. Although the assumption is of automatic disclosure, a small number of exclusions apply in order not to harm DFID's work or staff. Exemption criteria include information that may harm DFID's relations with other governments or institutions, information that may pose a risk to the security or safety of individuals, information that intrudes on the privacy of a person or information that does harm to either DFID or its par 
tners'/suppliers' commercial interests. 
 
- Aid Transparency Guarantee (including the International Aid Transparency Initiative), which is the 
government's commitment to publish more detailed information on projects, making summary information available in local languages and providing oppor 
tunities for feedback from people 
affected by DFID's programmes. 
For DFID, the transparency initiatives mean greater visibility of our work to people within the UK and also to people in countries we work in. Details of information published under both initiatives are available at https://www.gov
.uk/government/publications?depar tments%5B%5D=depar tment-for­
international-development 

## 6.6.3 Estates Review

As repor ted last year, the leasehold on our previous London office at 1 Palace Street was formally surrendered in December 2013.  Our successful relocation to new freehold premises in Whitehall, coupled with the adoption of modern working practices, has resulted in a significant reduction in our estate running costs. 

## 6.6.4 Foreign Exchange Policy Implementation

In order to provide an increased level of budget cer tainty for a par ticular programme, a foreign exchange hedging policy was implemented during 2011–12. DFID does not enter forward currency contracts to provide an accounting hedge and, in accordance with HM Treasury guidelines, hedge accounting has not been applied. A purchase of forward contracts to match South African rand exposure was made. Details of the policy are set out in the accounting policy on financial instruments together with details of the unrealised losses and values covered by the policy during 2013–14, which are set out in note 11.2 to these accounts. Additionally, during this year several contracts matured - note 11.2 also sets out details of exchange rate gains or losses realised which are reflected in expenditure within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. 

## 6.6.5 Publicity And Advertising

 
The Cabinet Office marketing and adver tising freeze (from June 2010) remained in place during all of 
2013–14. As a result, DFID incurred no adver tising or publicity costs during the year. 

## 6.6.6 Donations

No political or charitable donations were made during 2013–14. 

## 6.6.7 Complaints To The Parliamentary Ombudsman

In their annual repor t for 2013 (published May 2014), which is their most recently published repor t, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman noted that the number of enquiries relating to DFID fell from 3 to 2. The repor t can be found at http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_ 
file/0005/25259/FINAL_Government_Complaint_Handling_repor t_2013.pdf During 2013 the Ombudsman accepted a total of nil complaints for formal investigation relating to DFID. One complaint (carried over from the previous calendar year) was upheld; this compares to no complaints upheld against the Depar tment in 2012. The complaint upheld related to the Depar tment's investigation into allegations concerning the inappropriate use of funds and the handling of the complainant's details. There have been no new repor ts on DFID, or arms length bodies published since the 2013 annual repor t. 

 
During 2013–14 DFID and its agencies were fully compliant with Ombudsman recommendations. For fur ther information on the Ombudsman complaints process, classification of complaints and recent repor ts and consultations refer to http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/home. 

## 6.6.8 Performance Indicators

DFID collects information and data to measure the impact of our policies and reforms. The DFID Business Plan includes our input and impact indicators and other datasets. Progress is published regularly on the DFID website: https://www.gov
.uk/government/organisations/depar tment-for­
international-development DFID continues to publish information on our budgetary spend through the Quar terly Data Summary 
(QDS). Making this information publically available is a key component of the government's transparency agenda and is intended to enable the public to judge the performance of the Depar tment. 


## Contextual Information On Spending

In January 2012, the Cabinet Office published standard data definitions for common areas of spend. The definitions for the spending figures can be found at https://www.gov
.uk/government/publications/ 
common-areas-of-spend-data-definitions. The QDS presents the total spend of the Depar tment in 
3 ways: by budget; by internal operation; and by transaction. 

## Contextual Information On Results

The measurement annexes for input indicators, impact indicators are available on www.gov
.uk. DFID's QDS repor ts can be found at http://www.gist.cabinetoffice.gov
.uk/  

## 6.6.9 Recruitment Practice And Senior Civil Service Remuneration

An over view of DFID's recruitment practice and disclosure of Senior Civil Ser vice pay band information is presented within the Remuneration repor t in section 6.5. 

## 6.6.10 Better Regulation

DFID is not responsible for any regulations. However, within the Depar tment, DFID is improving its operational processes in a number of areas in line with Government's Better Regulation framework. It has established a Better Delivery Taskforce to improve programme management, complimenting its commercial capability improvements and is developing refreshed operational guidance to ensure improved clarity over processes, controls and accountabilities. In addition, the Depar tment is improving the way it engages and manages suppliers and is also developing its use of digital technology to improve interaction with programme delivery par tners. 

## 6.7 Governance Statement 6.7.1 Introduction

 
 
As Accounting Officer for the Depar tmental Group, I am responsible for ensuring that the Depar tment for International Development (DFID) has an effective governance framework which provides strategic direction and management of the organisation. In par ticular, I am responsible for ensuring that the suppor ting governance systems function as they are designed; that they oversee delivery of ministerial strategy and policy priorities, ensure value for money, manage risk, and ensure accountability and delivery of efficient and effective organisational performance. This is in suppor t of the achievement of the Depar tmental Business Plan and in accordance with the International Development Acts 2002 and 2006 and HM Treasury's Managing Public Money. 

## 6.7.2 Overview

To enable me to reach my overall opinion on the governance and control systems for DFID, I have drawn assurance from a range of sources including the work of the depar tment's Internal Audit Depar tment, the scrutiny of the Audit Committee, the Directors' annual statements of assurance, the opinions of the National Audit Office, and the work of the Independent Commission for Aid Impact. Taken together, these have given me a well-rounded and informed view of the Depar tment's governance and control environment. The last year has been a significant one for the Depar tment, as we led delivery of the Government's commitment to spend 0.7% of the UK's Gross National Income (GNI) on Official Development Assistance for the first time. The Depar tment has also played a leading role in shaping the post-2015 
development landscape, delivering its results commitments, and responding to emergencies such as Typhoon Haiyan and the impact of the continuing civil war in Syria. The Depar tment has also continued its drive for efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of our programmes, and has taken fur ther steps to ensure maximum impact and value for money from the Development budget. This has included the continued re-engineering of business processes, as well as growth in our skills and capability, par ticularly in relation to programme management and commercial activity. We have continued to strengthen our corporate functions, building a stronger network of professional skills across the depar tment, while also cutting costs. We have also recruited more technical and specialist skills into front line posts, suppor ting the scaling up of our programmes, par ticularly in fragile and conflict affected states.  
Looking fur ther ahead, we have also completed work to review our future business model, and to shape continued delivery in future years. This has par ticularly highlighted an increasing focus on economic development and job creation as a route to sustainable pover ty reduction. 

In relation to the wider reform agenda across the Civil Service, DFID was one of the first depar tments to publish a Depar tmental Improvement Plan. This plan sets out how DFID will build on the conclusions of the 2012 Capability Review and continue to make progress against the civil service reform agenda. In addition to reinforcing the impor tance of programme management and commercial skills, it also highlights the impor tance of the digital agenda to DFID's future programme and delivery work. The plan forms an integral par t of the depar tment's continuous improvement approach, enabling DFID to identify where progress has been made, what's working and where we need to focus more effor t to contribute to the Government's ambitious pover ty reduction commitments. 

## 6.7.3 Governance Framework

The governance framework comprises the roles and responsibilities of the Depar tmental Board and senior executive committees; the Accounting Officer and other officials and arms-length bodies; the control framework designed and implemented by these individually and collectively; as well as internal and external assurance. Each is described below. 

 
The **Secretary of State** for International Development, with suppor t from the depar tment's Minister of State and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, sets and makes decisions on the Depar tment's strategy and policy. 

The **Departmental Board** (the Board) is responsible for collectively advising on and monitoring implementation of the Secretary of State's strategy and policy priorities. 

The Board: 

 
 
- suppor 
ts and advises ministers in setting DFID's strategic direction, including through oversight of 
DFID's Business Plan 
 
- monitors the implementation of DFID's strategy and policy priorities 
 
- monitors progress against the results set out in the Depar 
tmental Results Framework 
 
- monitors and advises on significant risks to implementation 
 
- recommends remedial actions if operational or financial performance is off track 
The Board is chaired by the Secretary of State and meets quar terly in formal session. Its membership, which has due regard to an appropriate balance of skills, experience and diversity, comprises: 

 
- The Secretary of State (chair) 
 
- The Minister of State 
 
- The Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 
 
- Four Non-Executive Board Members, including one appointed as Lead Non-Executive Board  
Member and one as Chair of the Audit Committee  
 
- The Permanent Secretary 
 
- Directors General covering the separate por 
tfolios of Finance and Corporate Performance; Policy 
and Global Programmes and; Country Programmes. In June 2014 a Director General covering Economic Development was also appointed. 
Fur ther information on the Board's effectiveness and the attendance record is disclosed in Annex A. 

The Board is suppor ted by the **Executive Management Committee** (EMC), which provides strategic direction to the management of DFID's operations, staff and financial resources. The EMC: 

 
- oversees day-to-day implementation of DFID's strategy and policy priorities, in line with the  
direction set by the Secretary of State and the DFID Business Plan  
 
- communicates the vision, direction and priorities of DFID to staff and other stakeholders 
 
- assesses and manages risks to delivery 
 
- ensures effective allocation and management of DFID's staff and financial resources 
 
- monitors and improves DFID's performance and capability 
The EMC comprises the Permanent Secretary (as chair) and the Directors General. The EMC meets monthly. Fur ther information on the EMC's effectiveness and the attendance record is disclosed in Annex B. 

The **Accounting Officer** is responsible for maintaining a sound system of internal control that suppor ts the achievement of the policies, aims and objectives of the Depar tment, while safeguarding public funds and depar tmental assets for which he is personally responsible. 

A number of **subcommittees** provide additional suppor t and assurance. These are: 
 

 
- Audit Committee, chaired by a Non-Executive Director Richard Keys, which meets 5 times a year 
 
- Development Policy Committee, chaired by the Director General for Policy and Global  
Programmes, which meets quar 
terly  
 
- Investment Committee, chaired by the Director General for Finance and Corporate Performance, 
which meets quar 
terly 
 
- Security Committee, chaired by the Director General for Country Programmes, which meets  
quar 
terly  
 
- Senior Leadership Committee, chaired by the Permanent Secretary, which meets monthly. 
The **Audit Committee** is also responsible for assisting the Accounting Officer to review structures and processes designed to ensure a sound system of internal control, including the oversight of the Internal Audit function, and to ensure the integrity of financial repor ting. 

Over the last year and up to the date of approval of these accounts, the Audit Committee: 

 
- approved the Internal Audit Depar 
tment's char 
ter and work plan 
 
- reviewed Internal Audit Depar 
tment's assurance repor 
ts and discussed with management any 
remedial actions identified 
 
- considered key controls, processes and policies including in respect of due diligence,  
whistleblowing and returnable capital  
 
- reviewed National Audit Office country visits repor 
ts and discussed with management any  
remedial actions identified  
 
- considered the Internal Audit Depar 
tment's Interim and Annual Repor 
ts for 2013–14 
 
- considered the Directors' Statements of Assurance as at March 2014 
 
- considered the National Audit Office Audit Completion Repor 
t and Management Letter for 2013–14 
 
- considered the Annual Repor 
t and Accounts for the 12 months ended 31 March 2014 
Meetings are also held regularly with both the Head of Internal Audit and the National Audit Office without management present. The Permanent Secretary and Director General for Finance and Corporate Performance regularly attend the committee. 

The **Development Policy Committee** is responsible for the scrutiny and development of significant new policy proposals. This year it covered a broad spectrum of policy areas including governance, fragile states, climate and environment, and engagement with multilaterals. This helped broaden ownership and awareness of policy initiatives. 

The **Investment Committee** is responsible for ensuring that DFID investments represent good value for money, and that clear systems exist to enable management to take strategic financial decisions on the basis of evidence. This is achieved by reviewing strategic investment decisions and resource allocation, the investment por tfolio and key controls and policies. 

During the year the Investment Committee: 

 
- oversaw work on strengthening DFID's programme management, including a review of the DFID 
programme management cycle, and reviews of programme design and monitoring 
 
- reviewed the performance of specific par 
ts of the DFID por 
tfolio 
 
- continued to use the improved data and evidence on results and value for money which is now 
available from DFID systems. Quar 
terly management information repor 
ts were improved to include 
better data on programme performance and por 
tfolio quality 
The **Security Committee** is responsible for monitoring the adequacy and effectiveness of all aspects of the Depar tment's security globally. The committee is primarily concerned with people security but it may review all aspects of physical, personnel, information security and health and safety issues as required. During the last year the committee endorsed the development and roll-out of ISO 22301 compliant business continuity plans following an Internal Audit Depar tment review. In addition it commissioned security reviews in selected countries and proposals for a DFID crisis response strategy. The Security Committee also reviewed security training provision for overseas staff. 

The **Senior Leadership Committee** is responsible for ensuring DFID's Senior Civil Service (SCS) 
structure and roles are designed to meet our future and changing leadership needs, managing SCS performance and pay/reward, and leading on SCS talent and succession/pipeline management. During the year the Senior Leadership Committee: 

 
- integrated the new Civil Service competency framework into SCS leadership expectations (and 
associated people processes), including increased emphasis on programme management 
 
 
- introduced a combined summary for capturing performance and talent assessment through End of 
Year Reviews 
 
- implemented a leadership transitions programme for new Deputy Directors 
 
- established a Talent Board to steer and drive continual improvement in DFID's approach to talent 
management and development 
Following the financial year-end, a review of the corporate governance arrangements has made recommendations that build on existing arrangements. The main recommendations are: 

 
- that the main point of engagement for the Non-Executive Directors should be through the 
Depar 
tmental Board and subcommittees 
 
- that the audit committee should repor 
t to the Depar 
tmental Board 
 
- that the subcommittee structure be rationalised, with the Development Policy Committee no longer 
forming par 
t of the formal governance structure 
These recommendations will be implemented during 2014–15. 

## 6.7.4 Assurance Framework

In my review of the effectiveness of the system of internal control, I draw on assurance from multiple sources: 

 
- **'Front-line' or business operational areas:** DFID has established arrangements that are used to 
derive assurance on how well objectives are being met and risks managed. These include policy and performance data, monitoring statistics, risk registers, repor 
ts on the routine system controls, 
the directors' annual statements of assurance and other management information; 
 
- **Management oversight:** separate from the work of those responsible for delivery, this includes 
work under 
taken by the Quality Assurance Unit, the central finance and human resource teams, 
the depar 
tmental security unit and regular policy reviews and lesson learning exercises; 
 
- **Independent and objective assurance:** This includes the work of internal audit, which carries out 
an annual programme of work specifically designed to provide the Accounting Officer with an independent and objective opinion on the framework of governance, risk management and control. Internal audit places reliance upon front line and management assurance mechanisms, where possible, to enable it to direct its resources most effectively, on areas assessed as at highest risk or where there are gaps or weaknesses in other assurance arrangements. 
In addition, external independent assurance is provided by: 

 
-  **The Independent Commission for Aid Impact** (ICAI), which reviews the quality, value for 
money and impact of DFID's programmes. 
-  **The National Audit Office** (NAO), which reviews DFID's financial repor 
ting and performance, 
 
the regularity of its expenditure and conducts value for money studies.  
There have been no ministerial directions given during 2013–14.  

## 6.7.5 Risk Profile And Developments In The Department'S Approach To Risk And Control

DFID's risk profile has increased over recent years. The depar tment's budget has grown substantially, as par t of the government's commitment to deliver 0.7% of GNI as official development assistance from 2013. The government has also set an ambitious strategy for its international development work, built around a clear results framework, a commitment to transparency, and a scaling up of work in fragile and conflict-affected states. 

Against this background, the Depar tment has ensured successful delivery of the 0.7% commitment in 2013, and remains on track to deliver the specific commitments set out in the Depar tmental Results Framework in 2011. Overall assessments of the Depar tment's work remain very positive: the Depar tment has a strong reputation as one of the world's leading bilateral development organisations; staff engagement remains at the very top end of government depar tments; and peer review, as well as internal and external assessments of the Depar tment and its work, presents a positive picture. At the same time, the Depar tment has recognised the need to strengthen its capability and performance in key areas, both to enable it to maximise its impact and results, and to respond to any weaknesses or capability gaps identified during the year. The key areas on which the Depar tment has focussed in 2013-14 are: 

## Strengthening Programme Management:

While processes and ways of working have been significantly strengthened since 2010 to suppor t increased value for money, we recognised early in 2013 the need for a review of our capability and culture on programme management, and the associated tools and processes. This aimed to ensure that the Depar tment not only learned lessons from the last 3-4 years, but also to ensure that the Depar tment is equipped for the challenges which it will face in the period ahead. The Depar tment also learned impor tant lessons from the ICAI review of the Trade Mark South Africa (TMSA) 
programme, which identified weaknesses and inconsistencies in aspects of our programme management in Southern Africa. As a result of this work, we are putting in place a range of reforms which will 

 
- streamline and simplify our programme management rules and guidance 
 
- establish a clear accreditation and capability building programme for programme managers 
across DFID 
 
- clarify roles, responsibilities and accountabilities, including the appointment of a Senior 
Responsible Owner for all DFID programmes 
 
- improve and standardise management information 
 
- strengthen both management assurance and external scrutiny and challenge 

## Improving Commercial Capability

Building on its commercial reform programme the Depar tment has continued to strengthen the commercial advisers' network across its country offices and other business units, introduced a key supplier management system, under taken procurement collaboration activity and completed commercial exper tise reviews on selected par tners. The Depar tment also committed to putting all senior civil ser vice staff through a 3-day commercial training programme, which is on track for completion by autumn 2014. 

## Improving The Identification And Management Of Risk

The Depar tment recognises the need to fur ther improve on its ability to identify risks and the year has seen an enhanced level of scrutiny and ministerial challenge, resulting in a clearer focus on risk awareness across the depar tment. 

In January 2014 the EMC initiated a review of DFID's corporate risk register. It is engaging with both the Government Actuary's Depar tment and external risk professionals to develop a refreshed strategic register, clarify accountability for risk owners and facilitate regular ongoing review and update. In autumn 2013 the depar tment initiated an end to end review of its programme management processes. In January 2014 it established the Better Delivery Taskforce to improve programme leadership and management. In summer 2014 the taskforce will deliver a refreshed operational framework, entitled Smar t Rules, which will enhance clarity on roles, responsibilities and accountabilities. 

Other suppor ting guidance for programme management is also being refreshed, with updated guidance on risk management being developed. This should ensure that programme risk management is better designed, more systematic and applied more consistently across the Depar tment and its operations. 

 
Security assurance mapping work under taken during the year has provided a positive view of staff safety and security risk management. 

## Tackling Risks Of Fraud And Corruption

Tackling corruption remains a top priority for the Depar tment. Guidance for DFID staff has been produced on anti-corruption procedures such as carrying out due diligence assessments for all organisations that receive UK assistance, and on including more vigorous assessments of corruption risk in business cases written before any organisation is awarded DFID funding. Last year the Depar tment published country specific strategies to explain how it safeguards UK 
development assistance and contributes to reducing the impact of corruption on development. The Depar tment also works with other relevant UK government agencies to improve access to information about potential threats to DFID programmes and is funding UK law enforcement units until 2016. These units are based within the Metropolitan Police and the City of London Police and are dedicated to pursuing illicit money flows and bribery related to developing countries. During 2013-14 the Internal Audit Depar tment's counter fraud section changed the nature of its engagement with the Depar tment, with a noticeable shift from focusing primarily on reactive fraud response (investigations) to widening its scope and remit to incorporate more structured activities around fraud assurance and proactive analysis and response. Details of the number of losses and their value are included in note 17 to the Accounts. Details of individual cases over £300,000 are disclosed in accordance with "Managing Public Money" requirements. DFID's Whistleblowing Policy has been revised and refreshed during 2013–14. The policy confirms DFID's commitment to protect whistle-blowers. Additionally, significant work is being done to update terms within DFID's template agreements, such as Memorandum of Understanding and Accountable Grants, to include clearer direction, expectations and accountabilities on the action to take in the event of suspicion of misappropriation of funds relating to counter fraud matters. 

## 6.7.6 Annual Assurance Opinion

 
The Internal Audit Depar tment (IAD) of the Depar tment is required to comply with Public Sector Internal Audit Standards: Applying the IIA international standards to the public sector (PSIASs). 

These standards applied from 1 April 2013. These require, at the year end, that the Head of Internal Audit forms an opinion over the adequacy and effectiveness of DFID's frameworks for: governance; risk management; and control. 

 
The opinion is based on the audit work performed in the year and up to the date of the finalisation of their Annual Assurance Repor t to the Audit Committee. This includes 

 
- the results of internal audits completed (in final or draft) 
 
- any follow-up action taken in respect of audits from previous periods 
 
- the effects of any significant changes in DFID's control environment 
 
- any matters arising from previous IAD annual assurance repor 
ts to DFID 
 
- the results of consultancy work under 
taken during the year 
 
- the consideration of value for money embedded within each review under 
taken by IAD 
 
- formal audit evidence and work 
 
- evidence gathered through being par 
t of DFID as an in-house audit ser 
vice 
IAD have repor ted no restrictions that have limited the scope of their work during 2013–14. 

In the Annual Assurance Repor t 2013–14 the Head of Internal Audit has expressed the opinion that: 
"We are satisfied that sufficient internal audit and assurance work has been undertaken to allow us to draw a reasonable conclusion as to the adequacy and effectiveness of  DFID's frameworks for governance, risk management and control. In the IAD's opinion DFID had adequate and effective frameworks for; governance; risk management; and control, covering the period 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2014, noting that risk management, whilst effective in result, is not well designed and requires systematisation to provide, on a reliable basis, a robust risk mitigation outcome." 
The measures set out above are designed to improve the framework for risk management.  

## 6.7.7 Additional Assurance Information

In addition to the annual assurance opinion from the Head of Internal Audit, I also place reliance on Directors' Statements of Assurance (DSAs). Each Director completes an annual DSA, providing the Accounting Officer with assurance that DFID's management systems are being applied consistently and effectively across their respective divisions. The DSA process covers 23 key internal controls and is under taken by all four Directorates and 63 
spending units. For 2013–14 all spending units have submitted a return and the Directorates have each provided a consolidated return. This year the main areas identified for improvement are: 

 
- Project Management Procedures 
 
Action has been taken during the year to ensure that all annual repor ts and project completion repor ts are being submitted by the agreed due dates with specific actions to address those overdue. Spending units have identified remedial actions to minimise the potential for a backlog of reviews to reoccur in future years, such as better planning and monitoring procedures. 

 
- Financial Planning and Budgeting 
The external environment has presented additional challenges to spending units delivering accurate and timely budgets and forecasting, including the introduction of government platforms and conflicts in some locations. Remedial actions proposed include closer management oversight and fur ther staff training. 

 
- Data Security 
The returns show that staff are regularly reminded about the need to be vigilant over data security, and induction materials are being updated to reflect this focus. During the year staff also completed a mandatory course on the new government security classification to suppor t appropriate records security. A self-assessment of cyber security confirmed that DFID is managing its cyber risk in a broadly effective way, recognising the fact that the Depar tment holds only a limited amount of highly classified material. The Depar tment has not repor ted any personal data incidents to the Information Commissioner's Office for the year 2013-14. 

As Accounting Officer, I also take account of findings from the work of ICAI and the NAO. During the year ICAI has scrutinised and repor ted on a broad range of topics and the 11 published repor ts have covered matters such as the depar tment's use of contractors, humanitarian response to Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines, and empowerment and accountability programmes in Ghana and Malawi. Only one of these repor ts, 'DFID's Trade Development Work in South Africa', was rated as red. The depar tment has responded robustly to the weaknesses in delivery and oversight of TMSA that this repor t identified. 

During the year the NAO has scrutinised and repor ted on the Depar tment, under taking the year-end financial audit and performed a number of effectiveness and value for money audits of the Depar tment's expenditure. 

The Comptroller and Auditor General signed the Depar tment's 2012–13 Annual Repor t and Accounts on 20 June 2013, before the parliamentary recess, and issued an unqualified audit opinion. 

 
Published repor ts during the year have covered matters such as malaria and the reliability of performance data and a fur ther major study, concerning the Private Infrastructure Development Group is currently in progress. 

## 6.7.8 Arm'S-Length Bodies

DFID has 2 Non Depar tmental Public Bodies for which I am responsible as Accounting Officer. 

## 6.7.8.1 The Independent Commission For Aid Impact (Icai)

ICAI was established in May 2011. Its role is to provide independent scrutiny of UK aid, to promote the delivery of value for money for British taxpayers and to maximise the impact of aid. It repor ts directly to Parliament through the International Development Select Committee. Expenditure by ICAI in 2013–14 was £3.7 million. The Secretary of State is accountable to Parliament for ICAI and, in delivery of this responsibility, the Secretary of State and the Depar tment's EMC respectively meet the ICAI commissioners regularly to ensure that ICAI is able to carry out its work effectively. As required by the Memorandum of Understanding and the Framework Agreement, ICAI Commissioners have approved a Corporate Plan setting out internal control and risk management arrangements. In July 2013 ICAI published its second annual repor t, which provides an outline of its activities during the period from May 2012 to May 2013 and highlights some of the key themes it has identified in under taking its work. 

In accordance with Cabinet Office requirement for triennial reviews of all Non-Depar tmental Public Bodies, a review of ICAI was under taken in 2013. It was conducted and monitored by a Challenge Group whose terms of reference and membership were agreed by the Cabinet Office. The review provided a robust challenge of the continuing need for ICAI and an assessment of the control and governance arrangements to establish whether or not it complies with recognised principles of good corporate governance. The repor t, published in December 2013, concluded that: 

 
- the functions performed by ICAI are still required but need refinement to ensure clarity and 
maximisation of value for money 
 
- ICAI should focus on depth of analysis rather than breadth while retaining the ability to produce 
shor 
ter repor 
ts on topics of par 
ticular interest to stakeholders 
 
- ICAI continues to be the most effective way of delivering these functions 
 
- ICAI governance arrangements comply with Cabinet Office guidance on good corporate 
governance but in some areas documentation needs to be updated and amended in order to fully comply and in other areas documentation must be published 
 
- the role of the International Development Committee should be more clearly defined 
All payments for ICAI are made through DFID systems, which are subject to DFID controls. In addition an annual repor t by the International Development Committee on ICAI, including recommendations, is reviewed by DFID, and DFID responds to recommendations made. 

## 6.7.8.2 The Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (Csc)

CSC manages the UK contribution to the Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Programme. DFID's grant in aid to CSC in 2013–14 was £24 million. A triennial review of CSC was conducted during the year and the repor t issued in September 2013. 

The review concluded that CSC meets statutory and technical requirements for delivering the Commonwealth Scholarship Fellowship Programme. It operates a sound selection process and its evaluation and monitoring of the impact of the CSC awards is developing well and indicates a good level of achievement. 

CSC is cost effective and a successor body would be unable to achieve similar efficiency levels. The organisation has strong suppor t and respect among all its stakeholders. Although there were no weaknesses over the process for delivery or decision-making, there is room for improvement in the governance arrangements to fully meet the requirements of the non-depar tmental public bodies standards. 

DFID oversees the work of CSC through a dedicated relationship team within DFID. There are also arrangements for DFID representation at Commissioners' meetings and, going forward, CSC is subject to external audit. 

## 6.7.9 Other Public Sector Bodies - Cdc Group Plc (Cdc)

DFID is also the 100% shareholder of CDC, a public limited company. CDC is governed by a Board of Directors answerable to the shareholder through normal company governance processes. The Secretary of State may appoint up to two non-executive directors of CDC. The company prepares annual accounts to 31 December. The Depar tment is not involved in CDC operations and does not take par t in operational investment decision-taking. Accordingly CDC is not consolidated within the accounts of the Depar tment. 

## 6.7.10 Key Risk Areas In 2014–15

Looking ahead to 2014–15, I expect the Depar tment to retain a strong focus on embedding the changes to programme management which were described above. I will also maintain a strong focus on continued implementation of the Finance and Commercial Improvement Plans. During the year DFID will continue to operate in a range of challenging environments, with the focus remaining on our work in fragile and conflict states, as well as on countries undergoing rapid economic growth and social change. Within this context the Depar tment will enhance its focus on managing key risks to ensure we continue to deliver improvement. 

## 6.7.11 Closing Statement

 
I am satisfied with DFID's governance arrangements in terms of safeguarding the use of taxpayers' money. Recognising the changing environment for the Depar tment, including heavy engagement in fragile states, DFID will continue to strengthen its governance arrangements. This will ensure we achieve value for money and results from the resources given to us, and achieve our key objective of reducing pover ty. Accordingly CSC is not consolidated within the accounts of the Depar tment. 

Mark Lowcock Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 

## Annex A - Departmental Board

A review of the effectiveness of the Depar tmental Board was carried out by a DFID Director, repor ting to the Permanent Secretary and the Lead Non-Executive Director, Vivienne Cox, and was agreed by the Secretary of State. The review confirmed that the Board has made good progress over the last year. In par ticular it confirmed that the Depar tmental Board: 

 
- provided strategic direction to DFID strategy and policy and to the management of DFID's 
operations, staff and financial resources, and monitored and improved DFID's performance and capability 
 
- received relevant and well-presented management information 
 
- have enough diversity of views and a good mix of skills and experience 
 
- prioritised the right issues in the right order and had a good rhythm of meetings across the year. 
The lead Non-Executive Board Member, Vivienne Cox suppor ts the Secretary of State in her capacity as Chair of the Depar tmental Board, and the Permanent Secretary in his capacity as Chair of the Executive Management Committee (EMC) and Accounting Officer. The Board is required to ensure that it complies with the provisions of the 'Corporate Governance in Central Government Depar tments: Code of Good Practice 2011' or where it has not, explains the reasons for any depar tures from the Code. 

The Board is satisfied that it has complied with the Code. There have been both appointments to and resignations from the Board during the year: 

 
- In June 2013, to strengthen the Board's skills mix, 2 new Non-Executive Board Members were 
appointed, Tim Robinson and Eric Salama 
 
- In July 2013 a Director General, Michael Anderson, resigned 
 
- In November 2013 a Director General, Mark Bowman, resigned 
 
- In November 2013 a Director General, Moazzam Malik, was appointed on a temporary basis 
 
- In November 2013 a Director General, Nick Dyer, was appointed 
 
- In June 2014 a Director General, David Kennedy, was appointed 
There are non-executive members on 2 subcommittees of the EMC (Audit and Investment), bringing additional independent challenge directly to specific areas of the business. In par ticular, the Depar tment's Audit Committee is entirely composed of non-executive members to ensure independent and constructive scrutiny of the Depar tment's activities. The EMC provides an additional level of assurance to the Depar tmental Board. 

Management information is provided to the Depar tmental Board on a quar terly basis and the EMC on a monthly basis (including data from the Quar terly Data Summary Scorecard sent to HM Treasury). 

Management information repor ts provide current information and analysis on DFID expenditure, results and impact assessment, risk management and workforce deployment. The EMC is content that this provides sufficient and reliable information for ministers and the EMC to exercise their leadership role. 

## Departmental Board Attendance In 2013–14

During the year, the Depar tmental Board met on the following occasions and in addition held  
3 away-days in April, May and June 2013: 

 
- July 2013 
 
- November 2013 
 
- January 2014 
 
- March 2014 

| Departmental Board Member                                                  | Meetings attended    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Secretary of State                                                         |                      |
| Justine Greening MP                                                        |                      |
| Minister of State                                                          |                      |
| Alan Duncan MP                                                             |                      |
| Parliamentary Under Secretary of State                                     |                      |
| Lynne Featherstone MP                                                      |                      |
| Lead Non-Executive Board Member                                            |                      |
| Vivienne Cox                                                               |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Richard Keys                                                               |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Tim Robinson (appointed June 2013)                                         |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Eric Salama (appointed June 2013)                                          |                      |
| Permanent Secretary                                                        |                      |
| Mark Lowcock                                                               |                      |
| DG, Policy and Global Programmes                                           |                      |
| Michael Anderson                                                           |                      |
| [1]                                                                        |                      |
| (resigned July 2013)                                                       |                      |
| DG, Humanitarian, Security and Conflict                                    |                      |
| Mark Bowman (resigned November 2013)                                       |                      |
| DG, Finance and Corporate Performance                                      |                      |
| Richard Calver                                                             | t                    |
| DG, Policy and Global Programmes                                           |                      |
| Nick Dyer                                                                  |                      |
| [2]                                                                        |                      |
| (appointed November 2013)                                                  |                      |
| DG, Country Programmes                                                     |                      |
| Joy Hutcheon                                                               |                      |
| Acting DG for Humanitarian, Security & Conflict, and International Finance |                      |
| Moazzam Malik (from 1/11/13 to 31/1/14)                                    |                      |

[1] Michael Anderson was the Prime Minister's Special Envoy for the UN Millennium Goals; it was agreed that Nick Dyer would become a member of the Depar tmental Board and Executive Management Committee to cover issues in his absence. 

[2] Nick Dyer attended the Board throughout the year, as Director, Policy until November 2013 and thereafter as DG for Policy and Global Programmes. 

|               |
|---------------|
| 7             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 5             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 5             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 4             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 6             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 4             |
| of a possible |
| 5             |
| 4             |
| of a possible |
| 5             |
| 7             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 2             |
| of a possible |
| 4             |
| 4             |
| of a possible |
| 5             |
| 7             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 6             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| 7             |
| of a possible |
| 7             |
| -             |
| of a possible |
| 1             |

## Annex B - Executive Management Committee

To review its effectiveness the Executive Management Committee (EMC) under took the following actions during the year: 

 
- held an EMC away day focused on strategy and horizon scanning in autumn 2013 
 
- reviewed DFID's governance arrangements during the year, par 
ticularly the subcommittee 
structure 
The review of DFID's corporate governance was positive overall as to the effectiveness of the EMC. 

## Executive Management Committee Attendance In 2013–14

During the year the Executive Management Committee met 11 times. 

| Executive Management Committee Member                                      | Meetings attended    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Permanent Secretary                                                        |                      |
| Mark Lowcock                                                               |                      |
| Lead Non-Executive Board Member                                            |                      |
| Vivienne Cox                                                               |                      |
| [3]                                                                        |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Richard Keys                                                               |                      |
| [3]                                                                        |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Tim Robinson                                                               |                      |
| [3]                                                                        |                      |
| (appointed June 2013)                                                      |                      |
| Non-Executive Board Member                                                 |                      |
| Eric Salama                                                                |                      |
| [3]                                                                        |                      |
| (appointed June 2013)                                                      |                      |
| DG, Policy and Global Programmes                                           |                      |
| Michael Anderson                                                           |                      |
| [3] [1]                                                                    |                      |
| (resigned July 2013)                                                       |                      |
| DG, Humanitarian, Security and Conflict                                    |                      |
| Mark Bowman (resigned November 2013)                                       |                      |
| DG, Finance& Corporate Performance                                         |                      |
| Richard Calver                                                             | t                    |
| DG, Policy and Global Programmes                                           |                      |
| Nick Dyer                                                                  |                      |
| [2]                                                                        |                      |
| (appointed November 2013)                                                  |                      |
| DG, Country Programmes                                                     |                      |
| Joy Hutcheon                                                               |                      |
| Acting DG for Humanitarian, Security & Conflict, and International Finance |                      |
| Moazzam Malik (from 1/11/13 to 31/1/14)                                    |                      |

[1] Michael Anderson was the Prime Minister's Special Envoy for the UN Millennium Goals; it was agreed that Nick Dyer would become a member of the Depar tmental Board and Executive Management Committee to cover issues in his absence. 

[2] Nick Dyer attended the Board throughout the year, as Director, Policy until November 2013 and thereafter as DG for Policy and Global Programmes. [3] Non-Executive Directors attended EMC meetings for the first 9 months of the year. 

|               |     |
|---------------|-----|
| 11            |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 11            |     |
| 5             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 8             |     |
| 7             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 8             |     |
| 5             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 5             |     |
| 3             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 4             |     |
| 3             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 4             |     |
| 6             |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 6             |     |
| 11            |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 11            |     |
| 11            |     |
| of a possible |     |
| 11            |     |
| 10            | 11  |
| of a possible |     |
| 3             |  3  |
| of a possible |     |

## Statement Of Accounting Officer'S Responsibilities

 
Under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000, HM Treasury has directed the Depar tment for International Development to prepare, for each financial year, consolidated resource accounts detailing the resources acquired, held or disposed of during the year and the use of resources by the Depar tment during the year. The accounts are prepared on an accruals basis and must give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Depar tment and of its net resource outturn, application of resources, changes in taxpayers' equity and cash flows for the financial year. In preparing the accounts, the principal Accounting Officer is required to comply with the requirements of the Government Financial Repor ting Manual and in par ticular to: 

 
- obser 
ve the Accounts Direction issued by the Treasury, including the relevant accounting and 
disclosure requirements, and apply suitable accounting policies on a consistent basis 
 
- ensure that the depar 
tment has in place appropriate and reliable systems and procedures to carry 
out the consolidation process 
 
- make judgements and estimates on a reasonable basis 
 
- state whether applicable accounting standards as set out in the Government Financial Repor 
ting 
Manual have been followed, and disclose and explain any material depar 
tures in the accounts 
 
- prepare the accounts on a going concern basis 
HM Treasury has appointed the Permanent Head of the Depar tment as Accounting Officer of the Depar tment for International Development. 

This Accounting Officer is also responsible for the non-depar tmental public bodies within the Depar tmental Group. 

The responsibilities of an Accounting Officer, including responsibility for the propriety and regularity of the public finances for which the Accounting Officer is answerable, for keeping proper records and for safeguarding the assets of the Depar tment or non-depar tmental public body for which the Accounting Officer is responsible, are set out in *Managing Public Money* published by HM Treasury. 

Mark Lowcock Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 

## The Certificate And Report Of The Comptroller And Auditor General To The House Of Commons

 
I cer tify that I have audited the financial statements of the Depar tment for International Development and of its Depar tmental Group for the year ended 31 March 2014 under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. The Depar tment consists of the Core Depar tment and its non-depar tmental public bodies. The Depar tmental Group consists of the Depar tment and the bodies designated for inclusion under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Estimates and Accounts) Order 2013. The financial statements comprise: the Depar tment's and Depar tmental Group's Statements of Comprehensive Net Expenditure, Financial Position, Cash Flows, Changes in Taxpayers' Equity; and the related notes. I have also audited the Statement of Parliamentary Supply and the related notes. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out within them. I have also audited the information in the Remuneration Repor t that is described in that repor t as having been audited. 

## Respective Responsibilities Of The Accounting Officer And Auditor

As explained more fully in the Statement of Accounting Officer's Responsibilities, the Accounting Officer is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. My responsibility is to audit, cer tify and repor t on the financial statements in accordance with the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. I conducted my audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require me and my staff to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors. 

## Scope Of The Audit Of The Financial Statements

 
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Depar tment's and the Depar tmental Group's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the Accounting Officer; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition I read all the financial and non-financial information in the Annual Repor t to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by me in the course of performing the audit. If I become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies I consider the implications for my cer tificate. 

 
I am required to obtain evidence sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the Statement of Parliamentary Supply properly presents the outturn against voted Parliamentary control totals and that those totals have not been exceeded. The voted Parliamentary control totals are Depar tmental Expenditure Limits (Resource and Capital), Annually Managed Expenditure (Resource and Capital), Non-Budget (Resource) and Net Cash Requirement. I am also required to obtain evidence sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the expenditure and income recorded in the financial statements have been applied to the purposes intended by Parliament and the financial transactions recorded in the financial statements conform to the authorities which govern them. 

## Opinion On Regularity

In my opinion, in all material respects: 

 
- the Statement of Parliamentary Supply properly presents the outturn against voted Parliamentary 
control totals for the year ended 31 March 2014 and shows that those totals have not been exceeded; and 
 
- the expenditure and income recorded in the financial statements have been applied to the 
purposes intended by Parliament and the financial transactions recorded in the financial statements conform to the authorities which govern them. 

## Opinion On Financial Statements

In my opinion: 

 
- the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Depar 
tment's and the 
Depar 
tmental Group's affairs as at 31 March 2014 and of the Depar 
tment's net operating cost and 
Depar 
tmental Group's net operating cost for the year then ended; and 
 
- the financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with the Government 
Resources and Accounts Act 2000 and HM Treasury directions issued thereunder. 

## Opinion On Other Matters

In my opinion: 

 
- the par 
t of the Remuneration Repor 
t to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with 
HM Treasury directions made under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000; and 
 
- the information given in the Annual Repor 
t, Strategic Repor 
t and Directors' Repor 
t for the financial 
year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements. 

## Matters On Which I Report By Exception

I have nothing to repor t in respect of the following matters which I repor t to you if, in my opinion: 

 
- adequate accounting records have not been kept or returns adequate for my audit have not been 
received from branches not visited by my staff; or 
 
- the financial statements and the par 
t of the Remuneration Repor 
t to be audited are not in 
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or 
 
- I have not received all of the information and explanations I require for my audit; or 
 
- the Governance Statement does not reflect compliance with HM Treasury's guidance. 

## Report

I have no obser vations to make on these financial statements. 

Date: 9 July 2014  
Sir Amyas C E Morse Comptroller and Auditor General  
National Audit Office 157–197 Buckingham Palace Road Victoria London SW1W 9SP  

## Statement Of Parliamentary Supply Summary Of Resource And Capital Outturn 2013–14

|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|------------------------------|-----------|-----------|------------|-----------|-----------|------------|
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|                              | Estimate  | Outturn   |            |           |           |            |
| outturn                      |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| compared                     |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| with                         |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Note                         | Voted     |           |            |           |           |            |
| Non-                         |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| voted                        | Total     | Voted     |            |           |           |            |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| £000                         | £000      | £000      | £000       | £000      | £000      | £000       |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Departmental                 |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Expenditure Limit            |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| - Resource                   | 7,559,888 | 910,000   | 8,469,888  | 7,416,541 | 671,838   | 8,088,379  |
| - Capital                    | 1,969,442 | -         | 1,969,442  | 1,945,584 | -         | 1,945,584  |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Annually                     |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Managed                      |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Expenditure                  |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| - Resource                   | 191,524   | -         | 191,524    | 68,995    | -         | 68,995     |
| - Capital                    | -         | -         | -          | -         | -         | -          |
| Total budget                 | 9,720,854 | 910,000   | 10,630,854 | 9,431,120 | 671,838   | 10,102,958 |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Non-budget                   |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| - Resource                   | -         | -         | -          | -         | -         | -          |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Total                        | 9,720,854 | 910,000   | 10,630,854 | 9,431,120 | 671,838   | 10,102,958 |
| 7,921,465                    |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Total resource               | SOPS3     | 7,751,412 | 910,000    | 8,661,412 | 7,485,536 | 671,838    |
| Total capital                | 1,969,442 | -         | 1,969,442  | 1,945,584 | -         |            |
| Total                        | 9,720,854 | 910,000   | 10,630,854 | 9,431,120 | 671,838   |            |
| Net cash requirement 2013–14 |           |           |            |           |           |            |
|                              |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| 2013–14                      |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Estimate                     |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| £000                         | Note      |           |            |           |           |            |
| Net cash                     |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| requirement                  |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| SOPS4                        | 9,507,570 |           |            |           |           |            |
| Administration costs 2013–14 |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| Administration               |           |           |            |           |           |            |
| costs                        | SOPS3.2   | 123,600   | 115,973    | 127,815   |           |            |

Figures in the areas outlined in bold are voted totals or other totals subject to Parliamentary control. In addition, although not a separate voted limit, any breach of the administration budget will also result in an excess vote. Explanations of variances between Estimate and outturn are given in note SOPS2 and in the Management Commentary.  

| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| Voted      |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| Estimate:  |            |
| Non-       |            |
| voted      | Total      |
| saving/    |            |
| (excess)   | Total      |
|            |            |
|            |            |
|            |            |
| 8,157,374  | 265,876    |
| 1,945,584  | 23,858     |
| 10,102,958 | 289,734    |
| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
| £000       | £000       |
| Outturn    |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| compared   |            |
| with       |            |
| Estimate:  |            |
| saving/    |            |
| (excess)   | Outturn    |
| 8,620,747  | 886,823    |
| 2013–14    |            |
| Estimate   |            |
| 2013–14    |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| 2012–13    |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| £000       | £000       |

## Notes To The Departmental Resource Accounts - Statement Of Parliamentary Supply Sops1 Statement Of Accounting Policies

The Statement of Parliamentary Supply and suppor ting notes have been prepared in accordance with the 2013–14 Government Financial Repor ting Manual (FReM) issued by HM Treasury. The Statement of Parliamentary Supply accounting policies contained in the FReM are consistent with the requirements set out in the 2013–14 Consolidated Budgeting Guidance and Supply Estimates Guidance Manual. 

## Sops1.1 Accounting Convention

The Statement of Parliamentary Supply and related notes are presented consistently with HM Treasury budget control and Supply Estimates. The aggregates across government are measured using National Accounts, prepared in accordance with the internationally agreed framework 'European System of Accounts' (ESA95). ESA95 is in turn consistent with the System of National Accounts (SNA93), which is prepared under the auspices of the United Nations. 

 
The budgeting system and the consequential presentation of Supply Estimates and the Statement of Parliamentary Supply and related notes have different objectives to IFRS-based accounts. The system suppor ts the achievement of macro-economic stability by ensuring that public expenditure is controlled, with relevant Parliamentary authority, in suppor t of the Government's fiscal framework. The system provides incentives to depar tments to manage spending well so as to provide high quality public ser vices that offer value for money to the taxpayer. 

The Government's objectives for fiscal policy are set out in the Char ter for Budget Responsibility. 

These are to: 

 
- ensure sustainable public finances that suppor 
t confidence in the economy, promote 
intergenerational fairness, and ensure the effectiveness of wider government policy 
 
- suppor 
t and improve the effectiveness of monetary policy in stabilising economic fluctuations 

## Sops1.2 Comparison With Ifrs-Based Accounts

 
Many transactions are treated in the same way in National Accounts and IFRS-based accounts, but there are a number of differences as detailed below. A reconciliation of the Depar tment's outturn as recorded in the Statement of Parliamentary Supply compared to the IFRS-based Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure is provided in SOPS note 3.1. 

## Sops1.3 Capital Grants

 
 
Grant expenditure used for capital purposes is treated as capital (CDEL) items in the Statement of Parliamentary Supply. Under IFRS, as applied by the FReM, there is no distinction between capital grants and other grants, and they score as an item of expenditure in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. 

## Sops1.4 Non Voted Totals

This relates to the United Kingdom's contribution to the European Union's development budget as a member state.  It is accounted for in the Consolidated Statement of Parliamentary Supply as the propor tion of the EU attribution that applies to EU development related activity.  All cash settlements are made by HM Treasury directly. 

## Sops1.5 Prior Period Adjustments (Ppas)

PPAs resulting from an error in previous recording, or from an accounting policy change initiated by the Depar tment, need to be voted by Parliament in the current year, whereas in IFRS-based accounts 
(IAS 8), which includes accounts prepared under the FReM, they are treated as adjustments to previous years. PPAs resulting from a change in accounting policy brought in by a new or modified accounting standard are not included in Estimates, so there is no misalignment. 

## Sops1.6 Receipts In Excess Of Hm Treasury Agreement

 
This applies where HM Treasury has agreed a limit to income retainable by the Depar tment, with any excess income scoring outside of budgets, and consequently outside of the Statement of Parliamentary Supply. IFRS-based accounts will record all of the income, regardless of the budgetary limit. This situation may arise in the following areas: (i) profit on disposal of assets; (ii) income generation above depar tment Spending Review settlements; and (iii) income received above netting-off agreements 

## Sops1.7 Provisions - Administration And Programme Expenditure

 
Provisions recognised in IFRS-based accounts are not recognised as expenditure for National Accounts purposes until the actual payment of cash (or accrual liability) is recognised. To meet the requirements of both resource accounting and National Accounts, additional data entries are made in the Statement of Parliamentary Supply across AME and DEL control totals, which do not affect the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. As the Administration control total is a sub-category of DEL, Administration and Programme expenditure repor ted in the Statement of Parliamentary Supply will differ from that repor ted in the IFRS-based accounts. 

## Sops2 Net Outturn Sops2.1 Analysis Of Net Resource Outturn By Section



Outturn 
Estimate 
Outturn 
Administration 
Gross 
Programme 
Net total 
compared 
to Estimate, 
adjusted for 
virements
Net total 
compared 
to 
Estimate 
Income 
Net 
Gross 
Income 
Net 
Total 
Net Total 
Total 
Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limit 


Voted: 


- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
39,893 
39,893 
39,893 
- 
A: Depar 
tmental 
Unallocated Provision 
- 
- 
1,769 
22,311 
- 
22,311 
24,080 
37,454 
13,374 
1,374 
20,633 
B: CSC (NDPB) 
scholarships relating to developing countries 
1,769 
- 
- 
575,146 
(38) 
575,108 
575,108 
697,968 
122,860 
67,038 
419,247 
C: Wealth Creation 
- 
- 
- 
271,311 
271,311 
271,311 
305,355 
34,044 
4,044 
268,620 
D: Climate Change 
- 


- 
- 
735,506 
(1) 
735,505 
735,505 
663,922 
(71,583) 
- 
696,928 
E: Governance and 
Security 
- 
- 
- 
4,296,887 
(895) 
4,295,992 
4,295,992 
4,377,613 
81,621 
21,621 
2,388,532 
F: Direct Delivery 
of Millennium Development Goals 
- 
- 
- 
1,262,056 
- 
1,262,056 
1,262,056 
1,157,483 
(104,573) 
- 
1,333,672 
G: Global Par 
tnerships 
- 
(6,091) 
113,728 
125,617 
(65) 
125,552 
239,280 
247,019 
7,739 
7,739 
236,269 
H: Total Operating Costs 
119,819 
- 
-
(19,858) 
(2) 
(19,860) 
(19,860) 
1,675 
21,535 
1,535 
(13,291) 
I: Central Programmes 
- 
  
- 
- 
29,416 
- 
29,416 
29,416 
27,250 
(2,166) 
- 
18,892 
J: Joint Conflict Pool 
- 
- 
476 
3,177 
3,177 
3,653 
4,256 
603 
103 
2,914 
K: Independent 
Commission for Aid Impact (NDPB) (net) 
476 
Non–Voted Expenditure: 


- 
- 
671,838 
- 
671,838 
671,838 
910,000 
238,162 
238,162 
757,245 
L: European Union 
Attributed Aid 
- 
(6,091) 
115,973 
7,973,407 
(1,001) 
7,972,406 
8,088,379 
8,469,888 
381,509 
381,509 
6,129,661 
Total Spending in DEL 
122,064 


Annually Managed Expenditure 
 
 
Voted 


-
-
38,124 
(53) 
38,071 
38,071 
(1,492) 
(39,563) 
- 
(2,084) 
 
M: Wealth Creation 
-
- 
- 
3,774 
(5) 
3,769 
3,769 
158,105 
154,336 
114,056 
156,067 
N: Direct Delivery 
of Millennium Development Goals 
- 
- 
- 
(2,722) 
- 
(2,722) 
(2,722) 
(3,439) 
(717) 
- 
(3,748) 
O: Total Operating Costs 
- 
- 
- 
9,320 
- 
9,320 
9,320 
38,350 
29,030 
8,473 
(11,645) 
P: Central Programmes 
- 
- 
- 
20,557 
- 
20,557 
20,557 
- 
(20,557) 
- 
- 
Q: Climate Change 
- 
- 
- 
69,053 
(58) 
68,995 
68,995 
191,524 
122,529 
122,529 
138,590 
Total Spending in AME 
- 
(6,091) 
115,973 
8,042,460 
(1,059) 
8,041,401 
8,157,374 
8,661,412 
504,038 
504,038 
6,268,251 
Total 
122,064 
| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| £000       | £000       |
|            |            |
|            |            |

## Sops2.2 Analysis Of Net Capital Outturn By Section

|                          |                 |           |           |           |           | 2013–14   | 2012–13   |
|--------------------------|-----------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           | £000      | £000      |
|                          | Outturn         | Estimate  | Outturn   |           |           |           |           |
| Gross                    | Income          | Net       | Net       |           |           |           |           |
| Net total                |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| compared                 |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| to Estimate,             |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| adjusted for             |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| virements                |                 | Net       |           |           |           |           |           |
| Spending in              |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Departmental             |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Expenditure Limit        |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Voted:                   |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| A:                       |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          | Departmental    |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Unallocated Provision    |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| -                        | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |           |
| B:                       | CSC (NDPB)      |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| scholarships relating to |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| developing countries     |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| -                        | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |           |
| C: Wealth Creation       | 302,403         | -         | 302,403   | 409,044   | 106,641   | 19,409    | 194,279   |
| D: Climate Change        | 75,354          | -         | 75,354    | 107,461   | 32,107    | -         | 54,295    |
| E:                       | Governance and  |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Security                 |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| 11,086                   | -               | 11,086    | 10,271    | (815)     | -         | 13,808    |           |
| F:                       | Direct Delivery |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| of Millennium            |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Development Goals        |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| 51,483                   | -               | 51,483    | 62,607    | 11,124    | 124       | 70,115    |           |
| G: Global Partnerships   | 1,508,583       | -         | 1,508,583 | 1,379,059 | (129,524) | -         | 1,315,993 |
| H: Total Operating Costs | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
| I: Central Programmes    | 13,716          | (17,041)  | (3,325)   | 1,000     | 4,325     | 4,325     | 4,724     |
| J: Joint Conflict Pool   | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
| K:                       | Independent     |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Commission for Aid       |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Impact (NDPB) (net)      | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Non-Voted                |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| L:                       | European Union  |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Attributed Aid           | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Total Spending in DEL    |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| 1,962,625                | (17,041)        | 1,945,584 | 1,969,442 | 23,858    | 23,858    | 1,653,214 |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Annually Managed         |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Expenditure:             |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Voted                    |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| M: Wealth Creation       | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
| N:                       | Direct Delivery |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| of Millennium            |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Development Goals        | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
| O: Total Operating Costs | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |
| P: Central Programmes    | -               | -         | -         | -         |           |           |           |
| -                        | -               | -         |           |           |           |           |           |
| Total spending in AME    |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| -                        | -               | -         | -         | -         | -         | -         |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
| Total                    | 1,962,625       | (17,041)  | 1,945,584 | 1,969,442 | 23,858    | 23,858    | 1,653,214 |
|                          |                 |           |           |           |           |           |           |
Net total 
compared 
to Estimate

## Sops3 Reconciliation Of Outturn To Net Operating Cost And Against Administration Budget Sops3.1 Reconciliation Of Net Resource Outturn To Net Operating Cost

|                                               | Total resource outturn in Statement of    |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Parliamentary Supply                          |                                           |
| Budget                                        | 8,157,374                                 |
| Non-budget                                    |                                           |
| -                                             | -                                         |
| Less:                                         |                                           |
| Income payable to the Consolidated Fund       | (86)                                      |
| Programme Capital                             | 1,813,003                                 |
| Capital Grant in Kind                         | -                                         |
| Gain on disposal of Actis                     | -                                         |
| Non-voted                                     |                                           |
| (1)                                           |                                           |
| EU attribution                                | (671,838)                                 |
| Net operating costs in consolidated statement |                                           |
| of comprehensive net expenditure              | 9,298,453                                 |

  
1 Non-voted represents EU attribution - in line with FReM rules on activities charged directly, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure does not include amounts attributed to DFID to reflect spending on development activities by the EC from their budget. HM Treasury regulations do, however, require this expenditure to be included as budget outturn and as such it is incorporated within the Statement of Parliamentary Supply as non-voted resource outturn. 

## Sops3.2 Outturn Against Final Administration Budget And Administration Net Operating Cost

| Estimate - Administration costs limit    |   123,600  |
|------------------------------------------|------------|
| Outturn - Gross Administration Costs     |            |
| Outturn - Gross Income relating to       |            |
| administration Costs                     |            |
| Outturn - Net administration costs       |         4  |
| Reconciliation to operating costs:       |            |
| Less: Non-cash items                     |            |
| Administration Net Operating Costs       |            |
| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| £000       | £000       |
| Note       | Outturn    |
| 8,157,374  | 6,268,251  |
| 1,141,079  | 807,206    |
| 2013–14    |            |
| 2012–13    |            |
| Note       |            |
| £000       |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| £000       |            |
| Outturn    |            |
| 122,064    | 134,916    |
| (6,091)    | (7,101)    |
| 115,973    | 127,815    |
| (2,661)    | (16,653)   |
| 113,312    | 111,162    |

## Sops4 Reconciliation Of Net Resource Outturn To Net Cash Requirement

Resource outturn 
SOPS2.1 
8,661,412 
8,157,374 
504,038 
Capital outturn 
SOPS2.2 
1,969,442 
1,945,584 
23,858 
Accruals to cash adjustments:
   Adjustments to remove non-cash items:
    Depreciation
 (21,000)
 (12,264) 
(8,736)
    New Provisions
 (268,525)
 (140,091) 
(128,434)
    Departmental unallocated provision 
1,544 
- 
1,544
 Other non-cash items
 (38,500) 
(70,167) 
31,667
   Adjustments for NDPBs:
    Remove voted resource and capital
 (41,710)
 (27,733) 
(13,977)
 Add cash grant-in-aid 
41,710 
27,733 
13,977 
    
Adjustments to reflect movements in working balances
    Increase in receivables 
- 
106,856 
(106,856)
    Increase in payables 
- 
(809,864) 
809,864
    Use of provisions 
113,197 
115,157 
(1,960) 
Removal of non-voted budget items: 
Consolidated Fund Standing Services
 (910,000) 
(671,838) 
(238,162) 
Net cash requirement 
9,507,570 
8,620,747 
886,823 

## Sops5 Income Payable To The Consolidated Fund

In addition to income retained by the Department, the following income relates to the Department and is payable to the Consolidated Fund (cash receipts being shown in italics). 

Operating income outside the ambit of the Estimate 
(86) 
(86) 
(5,893) 
(5,893) 
Excess cash surrenderable to the Consolidated Fund 
- 
–
 –
 - 
Total income payable to the Consolidated Fund 
(86) 
(86) 
(5,893) 
(5,893) 
| Estimate          | Outturn         |
|-------------------|-----------------|
| Net total outturn |                 |
| compared with     |                 |
| Estimate: saving/ |                 |
| (excess)          |                 |
| Note              | £000            |
|                   |                 |
| 10,417,570        | 9,292,585       |
| Outturn 2013–14   | Outturn 2012–13 |
| £000              | £000            |
| Income            |                 |
| Receipts          |                 |
| Income            |                 |
| Receipts          |                 |

## Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Net Expenditure For The Year Ended 31 March 2014

|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       | Note                                    | DFID                                     |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Administration costs                  |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Staff costs                           | 3                                       | 67,548                                   |
| Other costs                           | 4                                       | 52,746                                   |
| Income                                | 6                                       | (6,091)                                  |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Programme expenditure                 |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Staff costs                           | 3                                       | 78,283                                   |
| Other costs                           | 5                                       | 9,083,031                                |
| Income                                | 6                                       | (1,144)                                  |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Grant in aid to NDPBs                 |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Administration grant in aid           | 23                                      | 1,761                                    |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Programme grant in aid                | 23                                      | 21,948                                   |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Net Operating Cost for the year ended |                                         |                                          |
| 31 March                              | 9,298,082                               | 9,298,453                                |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Total expenditure                     | 9,305,317                               | 9,305,688                                |
| Total income                          | 6                                       | (7,235)                                  |
| Net Operating Cost for the year ended |                                         |                                          |
| 31 March                              | 9,298,082                               | 9,298,453                                |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Other Comprehensive Net Expenditure   |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Net (gain)/loss on:                   |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       | - revaluation of property, vehicles and |                                          |
| equipment                             | 20                                      | 221                                      |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       | - revaluation of Programme Capital      |                                          |
| Investments                           | 20                                      | 359                                      |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         | - revaluation of International Financial |
| Institutions                          | 20                                      | 73,669                                   |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| - revaluation of investment in CDC    | 20                                      |                                          |
|                                       | - openng adjustment as at 1 April 2012  |                                          |
| - Current year adustment              | (120,900)                               |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
|                                       |                                         |                                          |
| Total Comprehensive Expenditure for   |                                         |                                          |
| the year ended 31 March               |                                         |                                          |
| 9,251,431                             | 9,251,802                               | 5,040,135                                |

The notes on pages 180 to 221 form par t of these accounts. 

| 2013–14      | 2012–13    |
|--------------|------------|
| £000         | £000       |
| (Restated)   |            |
| Departmental | (Restated) |
| -            | -          |
| (120,900)    | (227,800)  |

## Consolidated Statement Of Financial Position

| 31 March 2014                 | 31 March 2013            | 1 April 2012    |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------|
| Departmental                  | Departmental             |                 |
| Departmental                  | DFID                     | Group           |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Note                          | DFID                     | Group           |
| £000                          | £000                     | £000            |
| Non-current assets            |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Property                      | , vehicles and equipment | 7               |
| Intangible assets             | 8                        | 21,753          |
| Financial assets              | 11                       | 6,229,249       |
| Trade and other receivables   | 13                       | 69,973          |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total non-current assets      |                          |                 |
| 6,441,067                     | 6,441,067                | 6,337,984       |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Current assets                |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Financial assets              | -                        | -               |
| Trade and other receivables   | 13                       | 138,003         |
| Cash and cash equivalents     | 12                       | 24,109          |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total current assets          |                          |                 |
| 162,112                       | 162,724                  | 126,221         |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total assets                  | 6,603,179                | 6,603,791       |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Current liabilities           |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Trade and other payables      | 14                       | (3,882,589)     |
| Provisions                    | 15                       | (152,383)       |
| Bank Overdraft                | 12                       | -               |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total current liabilities     |                          |                 |
| (4,034,972)                   | (4,035,272)              | (3,186,336)     |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Non-current assets less net   |                          |                 |
| current liabilities           | 2,568,207                | 2,568,519       |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Non-current liabilities       |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Provisions                    | 15                       | (1,014,385)     |
| Other payables                | 14                       | -               |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total non-current liabilities |                          |                 |
| [1]                           |                          |                 |
| (1,014,385)                   | (1,014,385)              | (1,093,581)     |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Total assets less liabilities | 1,553,822                | 1,554,134       |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| Taxpayers' equity and other   |                          |                 |
| reserves:                     |                          |                 |
|                               |                          |                 |
| General Fund                  |                          |                 |
| [1]                           |                          |                 |
| 19                            | (2,399,635)              | (2,399,323)     |
| Revaluation reserve           | 20                       | 3,953,457       |
| Total  equity                 | 1,553,822                | 1,554,134       |
|                               |                          |                 |

 
[1] The Depar tment's net current liabilities and negative General Fund reflect the inclusion of liabilities falling due in future years. 

Under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000, no money may be drawn from the fund other than that required for the service of the specified year. In common with other government depar tments, the future financing of DFID's liabilities is to be met by future grants of supply and application of future income, both to be approved annually by Parliament. Such approval for 2013–14 amounts has already been provided and there is no reason to believe the allocation for 2014–15, 2015–16 and beyond will not be for thcoming. It has accordingly been considered appropriate to adopt a going concern basis for the preparation of these statements. 

Mark Lowcock Accounting Officer for the Depar tment for International Development 
4 July 2014 The notes on pages 180 to 221 form par t of these accounts. 

## Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows For The Year Ended 31 March 2014

2013–14 
£000 
2012–13 
£000 
Note 
Cash flows from operating activities 
21.1 
(8,547,871) 
(6,671,464) 
Cash flows from investing activities 
21.2 
(74,223) 
(82,281) 
Cash flows from financing activities 
21.3 
8,699,262 
6,716,689 
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the period before adjustment for receipts and payments to the Consolidated Fund 
77,168 
(37,056) 
Payment of amounts due to the Consolidated Fund 
(5,836) 
(8,058) 
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the period after adjustment for receipts and payments to the Consolidated Fund 
71,332 
(45,114) 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 
12
 (46,611)
 (1,497) 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 
12 
24,721 
(46,611) 

The notes on pages 180 to 221 form par t of these accounts.  

## Consolidated Statement Of Changes In Taxpayers' Equity For The Year Ended 31 March 2014

| DFID                                   | DFID        | DFID                              |
|----------------------------------------|-------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                        |             | General                           |
| Fund                                   |             |                                   |
| Revaluation                            |             |                                   |
| reserve                                |             |                                   |
| Note                                   |             |                                   |
| £000                                   | £000        | £000                              |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| (Restated)                             | (Restated)  | (Restated)                        |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Balance at 31 March 2012               |             | (1,403,265)                       |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Impact of prior year restatement       | 20          | -                                 |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Restated balance at 1 April 2012       | (1,404,031) | 3,708,063                         |
| 19                                     | 6,706,813   | -                                 |
| 19                                     | 54,370      | -                                 |
| 54,370                                 |             |                                   |
| Net Parliamentary Funding - drawn down |             |                                   |
| Supply payable adjustment              |             |                                   |
| CFERs payable to the Consolidated Fund |             |                                   |
| 19                                     | (5,893)     | -                                 |
| (5,893)                                |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Comprehensive Net Expenditure for      |             |                                   |
| the year                               | 19, 20      | (7,075,374)                       |
| Impact of prior year restatement       | 20          | -                                 |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Non-cash adjustments:                  |             |                                   |
| Non-cash charges - auditor's           |             |                                   |
| remuneration                           | 4           | 265                               |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Movements in reserves                  |             |                                   |
| Realised element to General Fund       | 19, 20      | 89                                |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Restated balance at 31 March 2013      | (1,723,761) | 3,908,049                         |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Net Parliamentary Funding - drawn down |             |                                   |
| 19                                     | 8,699,263   | -                                 |
| Net Parliamentary Funding - deemed     |             |                                   |
| (54,370)                               | -           | (54,370)                          |
| Supply payable adjustment              |             |                                   |
| 19                                     | (24,107)    | -                                 |
| CFERs payable to the Consolidated      |             |                                   |
| Fund                                   |             |                                   |
| 19                                     | (86)        | -                                 |
| (86)                                   | -           | (86)                              |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             | Comprehensive Net Expenditure for |
| the year                               | 19, 20      | (9,298,082)                       |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Non-cash adjustments:                  |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Non-cash charges - auditor's           |             |                                   |
| remuneration                           | 4           | 265                               |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Movements in reserves                  |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Realised element to General Fund       |             |                                   |
| 19, 20                                 | 1,243       | (1,243)                           |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| Balance at 31 March 2014               |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
|                                        |             |                                   |
| (2,399,635)                            | 3,953,457   | 1,553,822                         |

The notes on pages 180 to 221 form par t of these accounts.  

Departmental 
Group 
Departmental 
Group 
Departmental 
Group 
         Total 
reserves 
    Total 
reserves 
General 
Fund 
Revaluation 
reserve
(Restated) 
(Restated) 
(Restated) 
 
1,872,899 
469,634 
- 
1,835,164 
1,835,164 
 (1,403,265)
 
3,708,063 
2,304,798 
89 
(89)
 - 
 
(1,723,078) 
3,908,049 
2,184,971 
8,699,263 
- 
8,699,263 
(54,370) 
- 
(54,370) 
1,243 
(1,243)
 - 

(2,399,323) 
3,953,457 
1,554,134 

## Notes To The Departmental Accounts 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the 2013–14 Government Financial Repor ting Manual (FReM), issued by HM Treasury. The accounting policies contained in the FReM apply International Financial Repor ting Standards (IFRS) as adapted or interpreted for the public sector context. Where the FReM permits a choice of accounting policy, the policy which is judged to be most appropriate to the par ticular circumstances of DFID for the purpose of giving a true and fair view has been selected. The par ticular policies adopted by the Depar tment are described below. These have been applied consistently in dealing with items that are considered material to the accounts. In addition to the primary statements prepared under IFRS, the FReM also requires the Depar tment to prepare a Statement of Parliamentary Supply with suppor ting notes show outturn against Estimate in terms of the net resource requirement and the net cash requirement. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. 

## 1.1 Accounting Convention

These accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention, modified to account for the revaluation of non-current assets at their value to DFID by reference to their current costs or fair value as appropriate. The justification for preparing these accounts on a going concern basis is set out within note 19 to these accounts. 

## 1.2 Basis Of Consolidation

These accounts comprise a consolidation of DFID and those entities which fall within its depar tmental boundary, as defined in the FReM, and make up the Depar tmental Group. Transactions between entities included in the consolidation are eliminated. A list of all those entities within the depar tmental boundary is provided at note 23. 

## 1.3 Coverage Of Accounts

These accounts cover the activities of DFID and its 2 non-depar tmental public bodies only, the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (CSC) and Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI). DFID is the sponsor depar tment for CDC Group plc (CDC), a self-financing public corporation, wholly owned by DFID. CDC is not consolidated in these accounts as, under FReM rules, public corporations are outside the depar tmental resource accounting boundary. DFID's 100% ownership interest in CDC is recognised in non-current asset investments. In line with FReM rules on activities which are charged directly to depar tments' expenditure, the primary statements in these accounts do not include amounts attributed to DFID in relation to spending on development activities by the European Union (EU) from the EU budget. The Statement of Parliamentary Supply does, however, include this expenditure when calculating resource outturn for the year under review. As a result this expenditure is included within both note SOPS2 and SOPS3, detailing the calculation between Resource Outturn for the year and the total included in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure.  

## 1.4 Operating Income

 
Operating income principally comprises rental income, loan interest and profits on disposal of non-current assets. It includes both income appropriated-in-aid and income to be surrendered to the Consolidated Fund, which HM Treasury has agreed should be treated as operating income under the ambit of the Depar tment. All income is accounted for on an accruals basis. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.5 Administration And Programme Expenditure

The Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure is analysed between administration and programme income and expenditure. The classification of expenditure and income as administration or as programme follows the definition of administration costs set out in Consolidated Budgeting Guidelines by HM Treasury. Administration costs and income reflect the costs of running the Depar tment. Programme costs reflect non-administrative costs, including payments of grants and other disbursements by the Depar tment and cer tain staff costs where they relate directly to ser vice delivery. 

## 1.6 Grants Payable

Grants payable are recorded as expenditure in the period in which the underlying event or activity giving entitlement to the grant occurs. Where the period to which the payments are to be applied is clearly defined, the appropriate resource adjustments are made. Where grants are made to governments or international organisations and UK contributions are pooled and cannot be matched directly with par ticular activities, expenditures are recognised in the period when agreed conditions for payment have been met. In cer tain cases, grant contributions to international organisations are made in the form of promissory notes. The full amount of the promissory note is recognised as an expense in the period in which the note is deposited. Amounts not drawn down in cash from promissory notes at the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position date are included in 'Trade and other payables'. 

## 1.7 Research And Development

 
 
Expenditure by DFID from programme budgets in support of research and development is charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure in the period in which it is incurred, unless it meets the criteria for capitalisation as defined in International Accounting Standard 38. 

## 1.8 Value Added Tax (Vat)

Income and expenditure is shown net of VAT where output tax is charged or input tax is recoverable. Irrecoverable VAT incurred is included within the overall cost of purchases. Amounts owed by HM Revenue and Customs for EC VAT at the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position date are included in 'Trade and other receivables'.  

## 1.9 Foreign Exchange

Transactions denominated in foreign currency are accounted for at the sterling equivalent at the exchange rate ruling at the date of each transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into sterling at the exchange rates ruling at the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position date. Differences on translation of realised balances are recognised as operating costs within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. 

## 1.10 Pensions

 
Past and present home civil servants are covered by the provisions of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) which is a multi-employer defined benefit scheme and is unfunded, except in respect of dependants' benefits. DFID recognises the expected cost of these elements on a systematic and rational basis over the period which benefits from employees' services by payment to the PCSPS of amounts calculated on an accruing basis. Liability for payment of future benefits is a charge on the PCSPS. The Depar tment recognises the contributions payable for the year in respect of defined contribution schemes, in accordance with IAS 19. Details of rates and amounts of contributions during the year are given in note 3. The PCSPS is an unfunded multi-employer defined benefit scheme, however, DFID is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.11 Property, Vehicles And Equipment

Title to freehold land and buildings is held in the name of, or on behalf of, the Secretary of State for International Development. Land and buildings are shown at current replacement cost based on professional valuations carried out at not more than 5 year intervals with the exception of the valuation of a leasehold related asset as discussed at note 7. As there are no indices available to update the historic cost between valuation points, land and buildings are held at depreciated revalued cost based on the previous revaluation. Refurbishments to freehold and leasehold proper ties are capitalised at the actual costs incurred, where these extend the useful life or functionality of the underlying leased asset. Equipment used for general administration purposes are recognised as assets, including any costs associated with bringing them into working condition. Therefore, asset costs include salaries and expenses of depar tmental staff arising directly from the development, construction and acquisition of the asset. Proper ty, vehicles and equipment do not include items purchased from programme expenditure to benefit overseas governments and others where the intention is that ownership will fall to the third par ties. 

Proper ty, vehicles and equipment are capitalised above a threshold of £1,000 for individual assets. 

Items of office and domestic furniture and IT equipment, some of which may individually cost less than £1,000, are capitalised on a grouped basis. Assets under construction are capitalised on the basis of actual costs incurred during the period until the work is completed when the asset is deemed available for use and reclassified accordingly. 

 
Non-current assets are valued at current replacement cost, which is deemed representative of fair value. Current replacement cost is updated quar terly based on monthly indices provided by the Office for National Statistics website, except in relation to freehold land and buildings, for which appropriate indices are not available. As explained above, any surplus on revaluation is recognised directly in the revaluation reser ve, except to the extent that the surplus reverses a previous revaluation deficit on the same asset which was previously recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. In such circumstances the resulting credit is recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. Any deficit on revaluation is recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure, except to the extent that it reverses a previous revaluation surplus on the same asset, in which case it is taken directly to the revaluation reser ve. 

## 1.12 Depreciation

Freehold land is not depreciated. Depreciation is provided on other proper ty, vehicles and equipment on a straight line basis over the remaining useful lives of the assets. Depreciation on assets under construction, including improvements to leaseholds, is provided from the point at which these come into use. The useful lives for main asset categories are as follows: 

|                           | Office accommodation (freeholds)     | 30 years    |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------|
| Domestic proper           | ty (freeholds)                       | 20 years    |
| Improvements to freeholds | 15 years                             |             |
| Leasehold-related assets  | Over the remaining term of the lease |             |
| Motor vehicles            | 5 years                              |             |
| Furniture and equipment   | Mainly at 5 and 10 years             |             |
| IT equipment              | 1 to 8 years                         |             |

## 1.13 Intangible Assets

 
Intangible assets comprise software licences and IT systems, and are valued at current replacement cost, which is deemed representative of fair value. Any surplus on revaluation is recognised directly in the revaluation reser ve, except to the extent that the surplus reverses a previous revaluation deficit on the same asset which was previously recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. In this circumstance, the credit to that extent is recognised in the 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.13 Intangible Assets (Continued)

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. Any deficit on revaluation is recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure, except to the extent that it reverses a previous revaluation surplus on the same asset, in which case it is taken directly to the revaluation reser ve. 

Amor tisation is provided on a straight line basis as follows: 

| Software licences     | Over the life of the licence (1 to 8 years)       |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| IT systems            | Over individually assessed estimated useful lives |
| (1 to 8 years)        |                                                   |

## 1.14 Financial Instruments

IFRS 7 *Financial Instruments: Disclosures* requires disclosures in the accounts that enable users to evaluate the significance of financial instruments to the financial position and performance. Fur thermore, it requires the disclosure of the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which DFID is exposed during the year and at the financial year end, and requires the explanation of how those risks are managed. Financial assets and liabilities are recognised when the Depar tment becomes par ty to the contracts that give rise to them and conditions satisfying recognition are met. These are derecognised when the right to receive cash flows has expired or where the Depar tment has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership or control of the asset. 

 
In order to gain greater budget cer tainty in relation to a par ticular programme, DFID mitigates the effects of potential falls in the value of sterling by taking out forward contracts to meet future currency requirements where considered appropriate. Such contracts are held in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at fair value, based on external valuations at the Statement of Financial Position date. Gains or losses in respect of forward currency purchases are recognised through the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Expenditure. DFID does not enter forward currency contracts to provide an accounting hedge and, in accordance with Treasury guidelines, hedge accounting has not been applied. All other financial assets and liabilities that are not separately disclosed in the accounting policy are recorded at amor tised cost using the effective interest method. 

## 1.15 Investments International Financial Institutions (Ifis)

Investments include the United Kingdom interest in cer tain International Financial Institutions (IFIs). 

Shares in these bodies are not traded securities. 



IFIs play an integral role in delivering DFID's objectives and as such, the value of the Depar tment's interest in these institutions is qualitative rather than quantitative. These investments are recognised at cost and subsequently measured at fair value. In the absence of market values an approximation of the fair value of DFID's interests in IFIs has been assessed as the amount that DFID would receive if the institutions ceased to operate. For all IFIs, this would be DFID's share of the audited net assets of the IFI, based on shareholdings at the time of dissolution. It is considered that the net assets shown on the Statement of Financial Position of each IFI, at the date closest to year end, adjusted for known changes in ownership, represent the best estimate of the net realisable value. Increases in the value of investments, including those arising from translation to sterling of underlying values of foreign currency denominated investments or from market movements affecting the valuation, are taken to the revaluation reser ve. Reductions in value are taken to the revaluation reser ve to the extent that value is no lower than that the carrying amount at initial recognition to the Statement of Financial Position. Impairments below this cost are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.15 Investments (Continued) Public Corporations

For financial years ending prior to 31 March 2012, in accordance with the FReM, investments in public corporations falling outside the resource accounting boundary were recognised at historical cost less any impairment. Impairments were assessed by comparing the historic cost to DFID's share of net assets, with any impairment being taken to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. For financial periods ending on or after 31 March 2012, in accordance with the FReM, investments in public corporations falling outside the resource accounting boundary are recognised at fair value. Subsequent to the initial recognition, gains and losses on the fair value of the investment at each Statement of Financial Position date are repor ted through the revaluation reser ve, with any impairment to the fair value and foreign exchange losses recognised immediately within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. As at 31 March 2014, DFID elected to retrospectively apply the change in accounting policy for the financial years ending 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013. 

## Other Investments

Other equity investments and cer tain 'returnable grant' arrangements are recognised at fair value at the Statement of Financial Poistion date. Subsequent gains and losses on the fair value at each Statement of Financial Position date are repor ted through the revaluation reser ve, with any impairment to the fair value and foreign exchange losses recognised within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. The valuation methodology for programme funded investments depends on the nature of the investment and will vary from programme to programme. 

## 1.16 Long Term Loans

In accordance with IAS 39, long term loans and receivables have been valued at amor tised cost based on expected future cash flows, net of provisions. The discount rate applied to future cash flows to calculate amor tised cost is the higher of the long term interest rate set by HM Treasury or the rate intrinsic to each agreement. Provisions applied include amounts which the UK has formally agreed will not be repaid. Repayments forecast to be made within one year are included in current assets (note 13.1). 

## 1.17 Impairment Of Financial Assets

 
The Depar tment assesses at each Statement of Financial Position date whether there is objective evidence that financial assets are impaired as a result of events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and prior to the Statement of Financial Position date. If such events are considered to have an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial instrument then the asset is impaired. For the purposes of a collective evaluation of impairment, financial assets are grouped on the basis of similar risk characteristics, taking into account instrument types and other relevant factors. These characteristics are relevant to the estimation of future cash flows for groups of such assets by being indicative of the counterpar ty's ability to pay all amounts due according to the terms of the asset being evaluated. The amount of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate set at inception. Future cash flows for a group of financial instruments that are collectively evaluated for impairment are estimated on the basis of expected cash flows for the assets and historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the group. Where the time value of money is material, financial assets are stated at discounted amounts using the real discount rate, adjusted for inflation, set by HM Treasury. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.18 Leases

 
Where substantially all risks and rewards of ownership of a leased asset are borne by DFID, the asset is recorded as a non-current asset with a corresponding liability recorded representing the net present value of the payments obligation to the lessor. Net present value is calculated as the value of the minimum lease payments discounted by the interest rate implicit in the lease. The interest element of the finance lease payment is charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure over the period of the lease at a constant rate in relation to the balance outstanding. 

 
Other leases are classed as operating leases and the rentals are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure over the term of the lease. No ownership rights are awarded and therefore no assets or liabilities are recorded within the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. 

## 1.19 Cash And Cash Equivalents

Cash comprises cash on hand with UK and overseas banks and demand deposits at the Statement of Financial Position date. Cash equivalents comprise any assets considered by management to be readily conver tible to cash, due to their highly liquid and shor t term nature, by way of a readily available market for sale. 

## 1.20 Provisions

DFID provides for legal and constructive obligations, related to past events, where the obligations are of uncer tain timing or value at the Statement of Financial Position date. Such provisions are based on the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation. Where the time value of money is material, provisions are stated at discounted amounts using the real discount rate, adjusted for inflation, set by HM Treasury. 

## 1.21 Early Retirement Costs

 
DFID meets the additional costs of benefits, beyond the normal PCSPS benefits in respect of employees who retire early, by paying the required amounts annually to the PCSPS, over the period between early retirement and normal retirement date. These costs are provided in full as an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure (within programme costs) when early retirements have been agreed and arrangements are binding. Liability for future payments is shown under provisions. Where the provision for employee exit costs is significant/material, the FReM requires that the cash flows are discounted. Amounts provided in year and held within the provisions balance at year end are neither significant nor material. 

## 1.22 Contingent Assets And Liabilities

In addition to contingent liabilities disclosed in accordance with IAS 37, the Depar tment discloses for Parliamentary repor ting and accountability purposes cer tain statutory and non-statutory contingent liabilities where the likelihood of a transfer of economic benefit is remote, but which have been repor ted to Parliament in accordance with the requirements of 'Managing Public Money'. 

Where the time value of money is material, contingent liabilities which are required to be disclosed under IAS 37 are stated at discounted amounts and the amount repor ted to Parliament separately noted. Contingent liabilities that are not required to be disclosed by IAS 37 are stated at the amounts repor ted to Parliament. 

 
The Depar tment discloses a contingent asset where it is probable there will be an inflow of economic benefits from a past event, but where the outcome (timing and/or value) is uncer tain. An estimate of the financial effect is indicated, where possible. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.23 Third Party Assets

Cash balances in the primary statements exclude amounts held for third par ties as custodian or trustee but in which neither DFID nor the UK government more generally has a direct beneficial interest. Amounts of this nature held at the Statement of Financial Position date are disclosed in note 22. 

## 1.24 Critical Accounting Judgements

The Accounting Officer, in preparing the Accounts, is required to select suitable accounting policies, apply them consistently and make estimates and assumptions that are reasonable and prudent. These judgements and estimates are based on historical experience and other factors considered relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting estimates are those which involve the most complex or subjective judgements or assessments. The areas of DFID's business that typically require such estimates in implementing the accounting policies set out above are explained in more detail below. 

## (A) Useful Lives Of Property, Vehicles And Equipment And Intangible Non-Current Assets

 
DFID's management annually reviews and re-affirms the appropriateness of the useful lives of tangible and intangible assets for the purposes of applying depreciation. 

## (B) Impairment Review Of Property, Vehicles And Equipment And Intangible Assets

Assets categorised as Land, Buildings and Dwellings, Leasehold Proper ty and Assets under Construction are recorded at depreciated historic cost. All other assets are recorded at depreciated current cost. Indexation factors are obtained from the Office for National Statistics for those assets recorded at current cost. Each year DFID carries out a review of carrying value to assess indications of impairment. 

## (C) Impairment Review Of Financial Assets

 
DFID carries out an annual impairment review of the carrying value of its financial assets. Details of this policy are set out in note 1.17. 

## (D) Provisions Against Long Term Loans And Receivables

 
 
Long term loan balances are held with a number of overseas governments and organisations. DFID carries out an annual review to assess the expected amounts receivable against the carrying value of loans outstanding, giving consideration to factors affecting recoverability such as political matters, for example stability within the recipient country, or economic developments and progress towards debt reduction initiatives such as the Paris Club or the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. Where there is a likelihood that the full carrying value may not be received, a provision is made against the carrying value of the amount due and balances repor ted in the accounts to the extent that the outstanding amount will not be recovered. Details of this policy are set out in note 1.17. 

## 1.25 Effects Of Future Accounting Policies

The following is a list of changes to IFRS that have been issued but which were not effective in the repor ting period: 
 
Annual improvements to IFRS (including IFRS 13 Fair value measurement, IAS 16 Proper ty
, plant and equipment and IAS 24 Related party disclosures) will be effective for financial repor ting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014. The Depar tment is currently assessing the impact of these improvements but, based on preliminary analysis, it is not expected to be material. 

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments is expected to be effective for financial repor ting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The new standard simplifies the classification and measurement of financial assets, previously repor ted under *IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement*, and will have a material effect on the disclosure and measurement of financial assets. 

## 1. Statement Of Accounting Policies (Continued) 1.26 Operating Segments

IFRS 8 defines an operating segment as a component of an entity: 

 
- that engages in business activities from which it earns revenues and incurs expenditure 
 
- whose operating results are reviewed regularly by the entity's decision-makers to make decisions 
about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance 
 
- for which discrete financial information is available 
DFID's structure comprises a number of divisions which are individually, and collectively, responsible for delivering the Depar tment's expected output and objectives. Each division repor ts through a Director to a Director General, who is a member of the Executive Management Committee. Budgets and resources are allocated to divisions based on operational plans. These are reviewed and signed off, firstly by the responsible Director then ultimately by the responsible Director General. The Executive Management Committee reviews a monthly finance repor t as a standing item on its agenda. This aggregates financial data for all divisions and summarises financial performance, both historical and forecast, by Director General area. As such, the divisions are considered the most appropriate operating segments for disclosure in note 2, which sets out the income and expenditure for each operating segment. 

## 1.27 Changes In Accounting Policy

Except for the change of accounting policy set out in note 1.15, DFID has consistently applied the accounting policies referred to above to all periods presented in these financial statements. 

## 2. Statement Of Operating Costs By Operating Segment

IFRS 8 requires disclosure of income and expenditure by operating segment. The basis for defining operating segments is set out in note 1.26. The standard also includes a requirement to show net assets per operating segment. The structure of DFID 
means that all assets included in the Statement of Financial Position are used for the general administration and benefit of DFID as a whole. As such, DFID considers the Statement of Financial Position to be centrally maintained and monitored by the Finance and Corporate Performance Division and it would therefore all fall under the repor ting line of the Director General for Corporate Performance. 

During 2013–14, there was a restructure carried out of divisions and as a result the operating segments differ from the prior year. 

## For The Year Ended 31 March 2014

| Director General                                                            | Division             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Corporate Performance                                                       |                      |
| Central Department Division                                                 |                      |
| 13,199                                                                      | (1,037)              |
| Business Change and Strategy Division                                       |                      |
| 549                                                                         | -                    |
| Business Solutions Division Level                                           |                      |
| 13,583                                                                      | -                    |
| Communications Division                                                     |                      |
| 50,992                                                                      | -                    |
| Finance and Corporate Performance Division                                  |                      |
| 10,140                                                                      | -                    |
| Group Operations                                                            |                      |
| 27,022                                                                      | (5,715)              |
| Human Resources                                                             |                      |
| 10,897                                                                      | (31)                 |
| Internal Audit                                                              |                      |
| 1,426                                                                       | -                    |
| Non-Departmental Public Body                                                | 3,653                |
| -                                                                           | 3,653                |
| Corporate Performance                                                       | 131,461              |
| Permanent Secretary                                                         | Top Management Group |
| Permanent Secretary                                                         | 3,990                |
|                                                                             |                      |
| Policy and Global Programmes                                                | Global Funds         |
| International Relations Division                                            | 767,191              |
| Policy Division                                                             | 755,567              |
| Research and Evidence Division                                              | 337,933              |
| Policy and Global Programmes                                                | 2,983,319            |
|                                                                             |                      |
| Asia, Caribbean and Overseas Territories                                    |                      |
| Africa, South & East Asia, Western                                          |                      |
| Hemisphere                                                                  |                      |
| East and Central Africa                                                     |                      |
| West and Southern Africa                                                    | 1,023,795            |
| Western Asia Division                                                       | 471,495              |
| Africa, South & East Asia, Western                                          |                      |
| Hemisphere                                                                  | 3,546,956            |
|                                                                             |                      |
| Economic Development                                                        |                      |
| Growth and Resilience Division                                              | 62,098               |
| International Finance Division                                              | 1,623,491            |
| Trade for Development Division                                              | 9,599                |
| Economic Development                                                        | 1,695,188            |
| Middle East, Humanitarian and Security Middle East, Humanitarian & Security |                      |
| Division                                                                    | 944,774              |
| Humanitarian, Security and Conflict                                         | 944,774              |
| Total                                                                       | 9,305,688            |
Gross 
expenditure 
Income 
2013–14 
Net expenditure 
£000 
£000 
£000 
819,688 
(11) 
819,677 
1,231,978 
(10) 
1,231,968 

## 2. Statement Of Operating Costs By Operating Segment (Continued)

For the year ended 31 March 2013  

| Director General                    | Division                         |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| e                                   | Finance and Corporate Performanc |
| Central Department Division         |                                  |
| Corporate Hub                       | 1,378                            |
| Business Solutions Division Level   | 16,357                           |
| Finance and Corporate               |                                  |
| Performance Division                | 14,383                           |
| Human Resources, Security and       |                                  |
| Facilities Division                 | 36,721                           |
| Communications Division             | 39,480                           |
| Internal Audit                      | 1,419                            |
| Non-departmental public body        |                                  |
| 2,914                               | -                                |
| Finance and Corporate Performance   | 209,885                          |
| Permanent Secretary                 | Top Management Group             |
| Permanent Secretary                 |                                  |
|                                     |                                  |
| Policy and Global Programmes        | International Finance Division   |
| Policy Division                     |                                  |
| International Relations Division    |                                  |
| Research and Evidence Division      |                                  |
| Joint Trade Policy Division         |                                  |
| Policy and Global Programmes        |                                  |
|                                     |                                  |
| Country Programmes                  | Asia, Caribbean and Overseas     |
| Territories                         |                                  |
| East and Central Africa             |                                  |
| West and Southern Africa            |                                  |
| Country Programmes                  |                                  |
|                                     |                                  |
| Humanitarian, Security and Conflict | Conflict, Humanitarian and       |
| Security Division                   |                                  |
| Middle East and North Africa        |                                  |
| Division (MENAD)                    |                                  |
| Western Asia and Stabilisation      |                                  |
| Division                            |                                  |
| Humanitarian, Security and Conflict |                                  |
| Total                               |                                  |
Gross 
expenditure 
Income 
2012–13 
Net 
expenditure 
£000 
£000 
£000 
97,233 
(51,450) 
45,783 
4,093 
(1) 
4,092 
1,893,618 
(125) 
1,893,493 
654,717 
- 
654,717 
669,244 
(2) 
669,242 
244,710 
- 
244,710 
10,245 
- 
10,245 
3,472,534 
(127) 
3,472,407 
718,682 
(49) 
718,633 
1,050,575 
(41) 
1,050,534 
863,658 
(186) 
863,472 
2,632,915 
(276) 
2,632,639 
133,617 
- 
133,617 
251,458 
- 
251,458 
429,398 
(44) 
429,354 
814,473 
(44) 
814,429 
7,133,900 
(58,443) 
7,075,457 

## 3. Staff Numbers And Related Costs 3.1 Staff Costs

Permanently 
employed staff 
Others 
Ministers 
Special 
advisers 
Total 
2013–14 
Total 
2012-13 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Wages and salaries 
117,174 
1,904 
- 
- 
119,078 
108,639 
Social security costs 
6,698 
- 
- 
- 
6,698 
6,067 
Other pension costs 
20,055 
- 
- 
- 
20,055 
19,239 
Subtotal 
143,927 
1,904 
- 
- 
145,831 
133,945 
 
Less recoveries in respect of outward secondments 
(111) 
- 
- 
- 
(111) 
(31) 
Total net costs 
143,816 
1,904 
- 
- 
145,720 
133,914 
Analysis of total 
Charged to 
Charged to 
Charged 
Administration 
Programme 
to Capital 
Budget 
Budget 
Budget 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
DFID 
65,400 
78,283 
2,037 
145,720 
Agencies 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Other designated bodies 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Total 
65,400 
78,283 
2,037 
145,720 

All staff costs relate to the Core Depar tment and ICAI only. CSC does not have any staff as it uses administrators to carry out its day-to-day operations. The Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) is an unfunded multi-employer defined benefit scheme. DFID is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities, therefore sufficient information is unavailable to enable DFID to account for the plan as a defined benefit plan. A full actuarial valuation was carried out as at 31 March 2007. Details can be found in the accounts of the Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation (www.civilser vice.gov
.uk/pensions). 

For 2013–14, employers' contributions of £18,420,743 were payable to the PCSPS (2012–13: £16,789,140) at 1 of 4 rates in the range 16.7% to 24.3% of pensionable pay, based on salary bands. The Scheme's Actuary reviews employer contributions every 4 years following a full scheme valuation. The contribution rates are set to meet the cost of the benefits accruing during 2013–14 to be paid when the member retires and not the benefits paid during this period to existing pensioners. Employees can opt to open a par tnership pension account, a stakeholder pension with an employer contribution. Employers' contributions of £240,384 (2012–13: £193,945) were paid to 1 or more of a panel of 3 appointed stakeholder pension providers. Employer contributions are age-related and range from 3% to 12.5% of pensionable pay. Employers also match employee contributions up to 3% of pensionable pay. In addition, employer contributions of £17,049 (2012–13: £13,883), 0.8% of pensionable pay, were payable to the PCSPS to cover the cost of the future provision of lump sum benefits on death in service and ill health retirement of these employees. No contributions were due to the par tnership pension providers at the Statement of Financial Position date. 

Contributions prepaid at that date were nil. 2 individuals retired early on ill-health grounds; the total additional accrued pension liabilities in the year amounted to £16,088. 

## 3. Staff Numbers And Related Costs (Continued) 3.2 Average Number Of Persons Employed

The average number of whole-time equivalent persons employed during the year was as follows. These relate to the Core Depar tment only. 

Permanently 
employed staff 
Others[1] 
Ministers 
Staff engaged on capital projects 
Corporate Performance 
29 
54 
- 
- 
83 
29 
Total 
29 
54 
- 
- 
83 
29 
Division 
Corporate Performance 
482
 
–
 
–
 
–
 
482
 
458
 
Permanent Secretary 
36 
- 
3 
3 
42 
47 
Policy and International Relations 
507
 
–
 
–
 
–
 
507
 
483 
Africa, South and East Asia and Western Hemisphere 
1,339 
- 
- 
- 
1,339 
1,265 
Western Asia and Stabilisation, MENAD, CHASE and International Finance 
519
 
–
 
–
 
–
 
519
 
488 
Total 
2,912 
54 
3 
3 
2,972 
2,770 

[1] Others have been recorded under Corporate Performance as more detailed information is not available 

## 3.3 Reporting Of Civil Service And Other Compensation Schemes - Exit Packages

| 2013–14                | 2012–13            |
|------------------------|--------------------|
| Departmental Group     | Departmental Group |
| Exit package cost band | Number of          |
| compulsory             |                    |
| redundancies           |                    |
| Total number of        |                    |
| exit packages          |                    |
| by cost band           |                    |
| Number                 |                    |
| of other               |                    |
| departures             |                    |
| agreed                 |                    |
| <£10,000               |                    |
| 1                      | 1                  |
| £10,000 - £25,000      |                    |
| -                      | 4                  |
| £25,001 - £50,000      |                    |
| -                      | 7                  |
| £50,001 - £100,000     |                    |
| -                      | 5                  |
| £100,001 - £150,000    |                    |
| -                      | 4                  |
| £150,001 - £200,000    |                    |
| -                      | 1                  |
| £200,001+              |                    |
| -                      | -                  |
| Total number of exit   |                    |
| packages               | 1                  |
| Total cost £000        |                    |
| 1,294                  | 836                |

All exit packages above relate to DFID. 

 
Redundancy and other depar ture costs have been paid in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Ser vice Compensation Scheme, a statutory scheme made under the Superannuation Act 1972. Exit costs are accounted for in full in the year of depar ture. Where the Depar tment has agreed early retirements, the additional costs are met by the Depar tment and not by the Civil Ser vice Pension Scheme. Ill health retirement costs are met by the pension scheme and are not included in the table. 

| 2013–14         | 2012–13    |
|-----------------|------------|
| Special         |            |
| advisers        |            |
| Number          |            |
| Total           |            |
| Number          |            |
| Total           |            |
|                 |            |
|                 |            |
| Number of       |            |
| compulsory      |            |
| redundancies    |            |
| Total number of |            |
| exit packages   |            |
| by cost band    |            |
| Number          |            |
| of other        |            |
| departures      |            |
| agreed          |            |

## 4. Other Administration Costs

Note 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Rentals under operating leases 
12,758 
12,758 
16,480 
16,480 
 
Charges under finance leases 
8,742 
8,742 
8,912 
8,912 
Other current expenditure 
21,393 
23,163 
27,693 
29,805 
Non–cash items 
Depreciation: property, vehicles and equipment 
7 
8,459 
8,459 
15,130 
15,130 
Amortisation: intangible assets 
8 
3,806 
3,806 
3,874 
3,874 
Revaluation of IT equipment 
9 
425 
425 
(571)
 (571) 
Impairment of furniture and fittings 
9 
1,011 
1,011 
191 
191 
Loss on disposal of proper 
ty, vehicles and equipment 
9 
1,148 
1,148 
590 
590 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets 
9 
48 
48 
- 
- 
Auditors' remuneration and expenses[1] 
265 
265 
265 
265 
Movement in provisions 
(5,309)
 (5,309)
 (2,825)
 (2,825) 
Staff costs 
3 
67,548 
67,548 
63,065 
63,065 
Grant in aid 
23 
1,761 
- 
1,980 
- 
Administration income 
6
 (6,091)
 (6,091)
 (7,101)
 (7,101) 
Total 
115,964 
115,973 
127,683 
127,815 

[1] In addition, the National Audit Office received cash fees indirectly from DFID via other organisations to which it is a sub-contractor for carrying out audited-related services. Indirect fees totalled £208,200 in 2013–14 (2012–13: £168,247). Cash fees directly received from DFID during 2013–14 were Nil (2012–13: Nil). 

| 2013–14      | 2012–13    |
|--------------|------------|
| DFID         |            |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        | DFID       |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        |            |
| 21,500       | 21,500     |
| 52,746       | 54,516     |

## 5. Programme Costs

Note 
7,140,277 
Grants and current expenditure 
14.2 
1,935,517 
Contributions to International Financial Institutions: promissory notes  
Loss on foreign exchange 
Non–cash items 
Movements in provisions 
15 
Gain on disposal of Actis 
9,083,031 
9,105,341 
6,911,530 
6,930,541 
Staff costs 
3 
78,283 
78,283 
68,443 
68,443 
Grant in aid 
23 
21,948 
- 
19,060 
- 
Programme income 
6
 (1,144)
 (1,144)
 (51,342)
 (51,342) 
Total net programme costs 
9,182,118 
9,182,480 
6,947,691 
6,947,642 

## 6. Income

Administrative income 
Rents from non–government bodies Other
Subtotal
 (6,091)
 (6,091)
 (7,101)
 (7,101) 
Programme income 
Non–capital operating income
 (69)
 (69)
 (149)
 (149) 
Capital grant in kind to finance transfer of property 
- 
–
 (44,145)
 (44,145)  
Sale of investment 
- 
- 
(5,721)
 (5,721) 
Grant in aid funding
 (450)
 (450)
 (490)
 (490) 
Other operating income 
(86)
 (86)
 (136)
 (136) 
Loan interest 
(539)
 (539)
 (701)
 (701) 
Subtotal
 (1,144)
 (1,144)
 (51,342)
 (51,342) 
Total
 (7,235)
 (7,235)
 (58,443)
 (58,443) 
| 2013–14      | 2012–13    |
|--------------|------------|
| DFID         |            |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        | DFID       |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        |            |
| £000         | £000       |
| 7,162,587    | 5,353,552  |
| 1,935,517    | 1,408,547  |
| 3,473        | 3,473      |
| 3,764        | 3,764      |
| -            | -          |
| 2013–14      | 2012–13    |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        | DFID       |
| Departmental |            |
| Group        |            |
| DFID         |            |
| £000         | £000       |
| £000         |            |
| (5,301)      | (5,301)    |
| (790)        | (790)      |

## 7. Property, Vehicles And Equipment

Consolidated 2013–14 
Land, 
buildings Leasehold-
Furniture 
Assets 
and 
related 
and 
IT 
under 


dwellings 
assets 
Vehicles equipment equipment construction 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Cost or valuation 
At 1 April 2013 
69,018 
48,278 
7,580 
20,787 
18,369 
18,246 
182,278 
Additions 
208 
1,544 
1,176 
966 
2,478 
2,109 
8,481 
Revaluation 
- 
- 
(387)
 (1,530)
 (1,000) 
–
 (2,917) 
Brought into use/reclassifications 
- 
- 
- 
- 
48 
- 
48 
Disposals 
–
 (544)
 (346)
 (2,206)
 (207) 
–
 (3,303) 
At 31 March 2014 
69,226 
49,278 
8,023 
18,017 
19,688 
20,355 
184,587 
Depreciation 
At 1 April 2013
 (3,062)
 (25,218)
 (5,374)
 (11,466)
 (14,330)
 (1)
 (59,451) 
Charged in year
 (1,906)
 (2,185)
 (776)
 (1,391)
 (2,201) 
–
 (8,459) 
Depreciation on revaluation 
- 
- 
166 
519 
575 
- 
1,260 
Reclassifications 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Disposals 
- 
454 
326 
1,225 
150 
- 
2,155 
At 31 March 2014
 (4,968)
 (26,949)
 (5,658)
 (11,113)
 (15,806)
 (1)
 (64,495) 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2014 
64,258 
22,329 
2,365 
6,904 
3,882 
20,354 
120,092 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
65,956 
23,060 
2,206 
9,321 
4,039 
18,245 
122,827 
Asset financing 
Owned 
64,258 
1,073 
2,365 
6,904 
3,882 
20,354 
98,836 
Finance-leased 
- 
21,256 
- 
- 
- 
- 
21,256 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
64,258 
22,329 
2,365 
6,904 
3,882 
20,354 
120,092 
8,481 
Additions (accruals basis) 
Movement in capital payable
(15,704) 
As shown in cash flow
 (7,223) 

## 7. Property, Vehicles And Equipment (Continued)

The above relates to assets held by DFID.  CSC and ICAI do not hold any assets. The Depar tment's freehold proper ty in East Kilbride was valued at 31 March 2011 by GVA Grimley LLP 
International Proper ty Advisers using Royal Institution of Char tered Sur veyors (RICS) guidelines. A revised existing use valuation of £6.2 million (land £1.24 million, buildings £4.96 million) was repor ted. 

Overseas proper ties were valued during 2011–12 as follows: 
Zambia proper ties were revalued at 13 February 2012 by Pam Golding Proper ties; Zimbabwe proper ties were revalued at 6 February 2012 by SEEF Proper ties; Uganda proper ty was valued at 17 January 2012 by Eastlands Agency Real Estate; Malawi proper ties were valued at 9 March 2012 by MPICO Limited; Pakistan proper ty was valued at 22 February 2012 by W W Engineering Services (Pvt) Limited; Ethiopia proper ty was valued at 31 January 2012 by CPMS. Included in leasehold related assets, is a proper ty held under a finance lease, entered into by a former executive agency of the Depar tment. The proper ty is now sublet through an operating lease to the University of Greenwich, which occupies the building and took on the work of this agency. The last formal valuation of the proper ty using RICS guidelines was performed at 31 March 2008 by DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Limited. An informal professional valuation was conducted in October 2011 to suppor t the Depar tment's consideration of options for the future management of the proper ty after the expiry of the finance lease. The value identified through the informal review is not significantly different from the formal valuation conducted in 2008. The formal valuation of the proper ty was not updated during the year to avoid replication of work in advance of the decision over future management of the proper ty. 

Included in buildings, is 22/26 Whitehall which was transferred to DFID from Cabinet Office during 2012–13 at a total value of £44.145 million. The valuation was provided by DVS on 12 October 2012. DVS is the proper ty arm of the Valuation Office Agency and provides professional proper ty advice across the public sector. Subsequently, DFID has under taken refurbishments to bring the proper ty up to a suitable standard for occupation and use by the Depar tment. This was completed during February 2013 and DFID 
commenced operations from the premises during February 2013. 

## 7. Property, Vehicles And Equipment (Continued)

Consolidated 2012–13 
Land, 
buildings Leasehold-
Furniture 
and 
related 
and 
IT Assets under 
dwellings 
assets 
Vehicles equipment equipment construction 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Cost or valuation 
At 1 April 2012 
20,035 
62,282 
6,709 
18,356 
15,682 
13,942 
137,006 
Additions 
2,836 
1,116 
1,202 
3,313 
1,413 
51,052 
60,932 
Revaluation 
–
 (15,373) 
73 
(353) 
1,379 
–
 (14,274) 
Brought into use/reclassifications 
46,147 
488 
- 
- 
- 
(46,747)
 (112) 
Disposals 
–
 (235)
 (404)
 (529)
 (105)
 (1)
 (1,274) 
At 31 March 2013 
69,018 
48,278 
7,580 
20,787 
18,369 
18,246 
182,278 
Depreciation 
At 1 April 2012
 (1,941)
 (25,142)
 (4,830)
 (10,422)
 (11,505) 
- 
(53,840) 
Charged in year
 (1,121)
 (9,621)
 (806)
 (1,475)
 (2,107) 
- 
(15,130) 
Depreciation on revaluation 
- 
9,510 
(29) 
161 
(808) 
- 
8,834 
Reclassifications 
- 
1 
- 
- 
- 
(1) 
- 
 
Disposals 
- 
34 
291 
270 
90 
- 
685 
At 31 March 2013
 (3,062)
 (25,218)
 (5,374)
 (11,466)
 (14,330)
 (1)
 (59,451) 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
65,956 
23,060 
2,206 
9,321 
4,039 
18,245 
122,827 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2012 
18,094 
37,140 
1,879 
7,934 
4,177 
13,942 
83,166 
Asset financing 
Owned 
65,956 
1,074 
2,206 
9,321 
4,039 
18,245 
100,841 
Finance-leased 
- 
21,986 
- 
- 
- 
- 
21,986 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
65,956 
23,060 
2,206 
9,321 
4,039 
18,245 
122,827 
Additions (accruals basis) 
60,932 
Movement in capital payable
 (970) 
As shown in cash flow 
59,962 

## 8. Intangible Assets

Consolidated 2013–14 
Software 
Intangible 
licences and IT 
assets under 
systems 
construction 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Cost or valuation 
At 1 April 2013 
39,738 
11,224 
50,962 
Additions 
380 
2,600 
2,980 
Brought into use/reclassifications 
–
 (48)
 (48) 
Disposals 
(24)
 (48)
 (72) 
At 31 March 2014 
40,094 
13,728 
53,822 
Amortisation 
At 1 April 2013
 (28,287) 
–
 (28,287) 
Charged in year
 (3,806) 
–
 (3,806) 
Disposals 
24 
- 
24 
At 31 March 2014
 (32,069) 
–
 (32,069) 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2014 
8,025 
13,728 
21,753 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
11,451 
11,224 
22,675 
Asset financing 
Owned 
8,025 
13,728 
21,753 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2014 
8,025 
13,728 
21,753 

The above relates to assets held by DFID. CSC and ICAI do not hold any assets. 

## 8. Intangible Assets (Continued)

Consolidated 2012–13 
Software 
Intangible 
licences and IT 
assets under 
systems 
construction 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Cost or valuation 
At 1 April 2012 
38,428 
7,365 
45,793 
Additions 
1,310 
3,746 
5,056 
Brought into use/reclassifications 
- 
113 
113 
At 31 March 2013 
39,738 
11,224 
50,962 
Amortisation 
At 1 April 2012 
(24,413) 
- 
(24,413) 
Charged in year 
(3,874) 
- 
(3,874) 
At 31 March 2013 
(28,287) 
- 
(28,287) 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
11,451 
11,224 
22,675 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2012 
14,015 
7,365 
21,380 
Asset financing 
Owned 
11,451 
11,224 
22,675 
Carrying amount at 31 March 2013 
11,451 
11,224 
22,675 

The above relates to assets held by DFID. CSC and ICAI do not hold any assets. 

## 9. Revaluation, Impairments And Disposals

This note summarises the impact of all revaluations, impairments and disposals on the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure and the Revaluation Reserve. 

| Statement of                               | Statement of              |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| Comprehensive Revaluation                  | Comprehensive Revaluation |
| Net Expenditure                            | reserve                   |
| Note                                       | £000                      |
|                                            |                           |
| Impairment/(revaluation) of of             |                           |
| IT equipment                               | 7                         |
| Impairment of furniture and fittings       | 7                         |
| Impairment/(revaluation) of vehicles       | 7                         |
| Impairment of leasehold-related assets     | 7                         |
| Loss on disposal of property, vehicles and |                           |
| equipment                                  | 4                         |
| Loss on disposal of intangible assets      | 4                         |
| Gain on disposal of Actis                  | 5                         |
| Realised element to General Fund           | 19                        |
| Impairment of International Financial      |                           |
| Institutions                               | 11                        |
| Impairment of capital project investments  | 11                        |
| Revaluation of investment in CDC           |                           |
| - opening adjustment as at 1 April 2012    | 11                        |
| - current year revaluation                 | 11                        |
| Total                                      | 2,633                     |

As discussed at Note 11, DFID have retrospectively applied a change in accounting policy related to the investment in CDC Group plc. DFID have elected to restate the financial statement comparatives for the years ending 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013. The result of the change in accounting policy increased the revaluation reserve in relation to the investment in CDC by £1,835 million and £228 million for the years ending 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013 respectively. No impairment was recognised on this investment during these financial years. 

| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| (restated) | (restated) |

 

## 10. Capital And Other Commitments 10.1 Capital Commitments

| 31 March 2014                                                                        | 31 March 2013              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| £000                                                                                 | £000                       |
| Contracted capital commitments at 31 March not otherwise included in these financial |                            |
| statements                                                                           |                            |
| Proper                                                                               | ty, vehicles and equipment |
| Intangible assets                                                                    | -                          |
| 287                                                                                  | 56                         |

## 10.2 Commitments Under Leases 10.2.1 Operating Leases

Total future minimum lease payments under operating leases are given in the table below for each of the following periods. 

| 31 March 2014                                                          | 31 March 2013    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| £000                                                                   | £000             |
| Obligations under operating leases for the following periods comprise: |                  |
| Land, buildings and dwellings                                          |                  |
| Not later than 1 year                                                  | 11,479           |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years                           |                  |
| 8,934                                                                  | 11,833           |
| 416                                                                    |                  |
| Later than 5 years                                                     | 1,553            |
| Total                                                                  | 21,966           |

## 10.2.2 Finance Leases

Total future minimum lease payments under finance leases are given in the table below for each of the following periods. 

| 31 March 2014                                                        | 31 March 2013    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| £000                                                                 | £000             |
| Obligations under finance leases for the following periods comprise: |                  |
| Land, buildings and dwellings                                        |                  |
| Not later than 1 year                                                | 47,156           |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years                         | -                |
| 47,156                                                               | 57,097           |
| Less interest element                                                | (2,146)          |
| Present value of obligations                                         |                  |
| 45,010                                                               | 46,211           |

## 10.2.3 Operating Leases Receivables

Total future minimum lease receivables under operating leases are given in the table below for each of the following periods. 

| 31 March 2014                                | 31 March 2013    |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------|
| £000                                         | £000             |
| Receivables under operating leases comprise: |                  |
| Land, buildings and dwellings                |                  |
| Not later than 1 year                        | 1,688            |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | -                |
| Total                                        | 1,688            |

The above relates to commitments payable to DFID. CSC does not hold any commitments requiring disclosure. 

## 11. Financial Instruments 11.1 Non-Current Financial Assets - Equity Investments

Programme 
Capital 
Investments 
International 
Financial 
Institutions 
£000 
At 1 April 2012 
3,283,828 
- 
Additions 
- 
Revaluations 
–
At 31 March 2013 
- 
3,290,062 
2,828,000 
- 
6,118,062 
 
At 1 April 2013 
3,290,062 
2,828,000 
- 
6,118,062 
Additions 
26,364 
37,951 
- 
- 
64,315 
Revaluations 
(359)
 (73,669) 
120,900 
- 
46,872 
At 31 March 2014 
26,005 
3,254,344 
2,948,900 
- 
6,229,249 

## Current Financial Assets - Available For Sale Equity Investment

| At 1 April 2012           | 1,678    | 1,678    |
|---------------------------|----------|----------|
| Additions                 | -        | -        |
| Revaluations              | -        | -        |
| Disposal                  | (1,678)  | (1,678)  |
| At 31 March 2013 and 2014 | -        | -        |

The above non-current and current financial assets relates to assets held by DFID. CSC do not hold any assets. 

## Subsidiaries And Associates: Key Data From Last Audited Financial Accounts

| CDC Group plc - ordinary shares    | £m      | £m      |
|------------------------------------|---------|---------|
| Portfolio return (before tax)      | 170.2   | 250.6   |
| Total return after tax             | 130.7   | 223.4   |
| Total net assets (valuation basis) | 2,948.9 | 2,831.6 |

## Programme Capital Investments

Programme Capital Investments include investments made by DFID to achieve defined development objectives whilst retaining an ongoing, recoverable, interest in the assets funded. These include equity investments and 'returnable grant' arrangements, the terms of which will vary depending on programme circumstances. Such investments are classified as 'available for sale financial assets' and are measured at fair value at the Statement of Financial Position date. 

| CDC Group plc    | Actis LLP    | Total    |
|------------------|--------------|----------|
| £000             | £000         | £000     |
| (Restated)       |              |          |
| £000             |              |          |
| (Restated)       |              |          |
| 2,600,200        | 5,884,028    |          |
| -                |              |          |
| 34,003           | -            | -        |
| (27,769)         | 227,800      | -        |
| Actis LLP        | Total        |          |
| £000             | £000         |          |
| 31 December      | 31 December  |          |
| 2013             | 2012         |          |

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.1 Non-Current Financial Assets (Continued) Public Sector Bodies

DFID, on behalf of the government, owns 100% of the issued ordinary share capital of CDC Group plc. In 2004, fund management activities previously carried out by CDC were transferred to a newly formed limited liability par tnership (Actis LLP). As a result DFID, on behalf of the Government, owned 40% of the members capital of Actis LLP
. The decision was taken to dispose of this 40% members capital and full binding agreement was reached during the year to 31 March 2013. Prior to 31 March 2012, in accordance with the FReM, investments in public corporations falling outside the resource accounting boundary, such as CDC and Actis LLP
, were recognised at historical cost less any impairment. Impairments were assessed by comparing the historic cost to DFID's share of net assets, with any impairment being taken to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. For each Statement of Financial Position date subsequent to 31 March 2012, in accordance with the FReM, investments in public corporations falling outside the resource accounting boundary should be recognised at fair value. Subsequent to the initial recognition, gains and losses on the fair value of the investment at each Statement of Financial Position date are reported through the revaluation reserve, with any impairment to the fair value and foreign exchange losses recognised immediately within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. As at 31 March 2014, DFID retrospectively applied the change in accounting policy for the financial years ending 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013. DFID has labelled the restated comparative information with the heading 'restated' to highlight that the comparative information has been changed from the prior year's financial statements. HMT further requires that self financing public corporations achieve a rate of return, described as 'cost of capital', to ensure that the opportunity cost of departments' investments is covered. If the corporation does not meet its rate of return over each CSR period, then the shareholding department may face a fur ther charge to the extent that such a return has not been met. 

The impact of the restatement on the investment of CDC Group plc is as follows: 

| At 31 March 2012    | 765,036    | 765,036    |
|---------------------|------------|------------|
| Revaluation         | -          |            |
| 1,835,164           |            |            |
| At 1 April 2012     | 765,036    | 2,600,200  |
| Revaluation         | -          | 227,800    |
| At 31 March 2013    | 765,036    | 2,828,000  |

As a result of the restatement, an amount of £2,063 million was recorded as a revaluation reserve effective March 31, 2013. 

## International Financial Institutions

Investments in International Financial Institutions (IFIs) are valued at fair value. There is no market in these investments - all shareholders are sovereign states. Fair value has been assessed as DFID's share of the net assets of the IFIs, based on the number of shares subscribed by DFID. The Articles of Agreement of all the IFIs specify that this is the value that DFID would receive on the dissolution of the IFIs. All investments in IFIs are denominated in a currency other then sterling. DFID is therefore exposed to currency risk if the value of these currencies was to fall against sterling.  DFID is also exposed to market risk, as the value of each investment is dependent upon the net assets of the IFIs. Base currencies of investments in IFIs are shown below. Figures in US dollars include those bodies for which the US dollar is used as the working equivalent for units of account formally expressed in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). Revaluations for IFIs include £211 million (net) of unrealised losses (2012–13: unrealised gains of £108 million) arising from changes in exchange rates. 

 

Impact of changes in accounting policies 
As previously 
reported 
As restated 
£000 
£000 

 

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued)

|                                                       |            |           | Currency    | Currency   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------------|------------|
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | $1,688,843 | 1,012,935 | $1,627,856  | 1,068,638  |
| International Finance Corporation                     | $1,121,667 | 672,754   | $1,050,000  | 689,293    |
| European Bank for Reconstruction and Development      | €1,281,677 | 1,058,874 | € 1,209,965 | 1,020,465  |
| Asian Development Bank                                | $351,426   | 210,778   | $335,370    | 220,160    |
| Inter-American Development Bank                       | $221,650   | 132,941   | $193,202    | 126,831    |
| African Development Bank (in Units of Account)        | 98,638     | 94,981    | 90,297      | 87,152     |
| Caribbean Development Bank                            | $74,471    | 44,666    | $74,288     | 48,768     |
| Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency              | $44,041    | 26,415    | $43,803     | 28,755     |

## 11.2 Forward Currency Contracts

During the year ended 31 March 2014, DFID entered into the purchase of forward purchases to cover its forecast net exposures in relation to a significant currency transaction in an area where the Department operates. During the period under review, 13 contracts matured. The value of these contracts undertaken was 484,677,154 South African Rand (sterling equivalent - £38.1 million) and the losses recognised on these contracts to maturity were £3.9 million. These losses are recognised within the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure for the year ended 31 March 2014. Forecast unrealised losses on forward purchases maturing in future periods, based on the actual exchange rates at the reporting period date, are analysed as follows: 

Foreign 
currency value 
Sterling value 
£000 
Current assets and liabilities 
South African Rand 
243,103,976 
18,443 
–
 (4,921) 
2014–15 

## 11.3 Interest Rate Exposure

Fixed rate 
£000 
2013–14 financial assets: cash 
Sterling US dollars Other currencies 
Total 
- 
7,430 
16,679 
24,109 
- 
2013–14 financial assets: loans and receivables 
Sterling 
3,009 
8,289 
27,149 
38,447 
2.79% 
Euro 
- 
- 
45,507 
45,507 
- 
Total 
3,009 
8,289 
72,656 
83,954 
2.79% 
|           |           |   2013–14  | 2012–13    |
|-----------|-----------|------------|------------|
| 000       | £000      |       000  | £000       |
| 3,254,344 | 3,290,062 |            |            |

 

Maturing in 
Unrealised 
gains 
£000 
Unrealised 
losses 
£000 
Fixed rate 
weighted 
average 
interest rate 
Floating rate 
£000 
No interest 
£000 
Total 
£000 
- 
437 
16,679 
17,116 
- 
- 
640 
- 
640 
- 
- 
6,353 
- 
6,353 
- 

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.3 Interest Rate Exposure (Continued)

Fixed rate 
weighted 
average 
Fixed rate 
Floating rate 
No interest 
Total 
interest rate 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
2013–14 financial assets: available for sale 
Sterling 
- 
- 
2,974,905 
2,974,905 
- 
US dollars 
- 
- 
2,100,489 
2,100,489 
- 
Euro 
- 
- 
1,058,874 
1,058,874 
- 
Other currencies 
- 
- 
94,981 
94,981 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
6,229,249 
6,229,249 
- 
2013–14 financial liabilities: promissory notes at amortised cost 
Sterling 
- 
- 
3,510,172 
3,510,172 
- 
US dollars 
- 
- 
9,971 
9,971 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
3,520,143 
3,520,143 
- 
2013–14 financial liabilities: other payables at amortised cost 
Sterling 
- 
- 
338,337 
338,337 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
338,337 
338,337 
- 
2012–13 financial assets/(liabilities): cash 
Sterling 
- 
252 
(50,226) 
(49,974) 
- 
US dollars 
- 
582 
- 
582 
- 
Euro 
- 
47 
- 
47 
- 
Other currencies 
- 
715 
- 
715 
- 
Total 
- 
1,596 
(50,226) 
(48,630) 
- 
2012–13 financial assets: loans and receivables 
Sterling 
4,130 
10,519 
16,705 
31,354 
2.75% 
Euro 
- 
- 
60,186 
60,186 
- 
Total 
4,130 
10,519 
76,891 
91,540 
2.75% 

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.3 Interest Rate Exposure (Continued)

Fixed rate 
weighted 
average 
Fixed rate 
Floating rate 
No interest 
Total 
interest rate 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
2012–13 financial assets: available for sale 
US dollars 
- 
- 
2,182,445 
2,182,445 
- 
Euro 
- 
- 
1,020,465 
1,020,465 
- 
Other currencies 
- 
- 
87,152 
87,152 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
3,290,062 
3,290,062 
- 
2012–13 financial liabilities: promissory notes at amortised cost 
Sterling 
- 
- 
2,742,176 
2,742,176 
- 
US dollars 
- 
- 
11,918 
11,918 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
2,754,094 
2,754,094 
- 
2012–13 financial liabilities: other payables at amortised cost 
Sterling 
- 
- 
301,533 
301,533 
- 
Total 
- 
- 
301,533 
301,533 
- 

## 11.4 Currency Risk Exposures

The tables below show the Department's currency exposures that give rise to exchange rate gains and losses that are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure. Such exposures comprise those monetary assets and liabilities that are not denominated in the Department's functional currency of sterling. 

| 31 March                           | 31 March    |
|------------------------------------|-------------|
| 2014                               | 2013        |
| £000                               | £000        |
| Financial assets: maturity profile |             |
| US dollars                         | 640         |
| Euro                               | 45,507      |
| Other currencies                   | 6,353       |
| Total                              | 52,500      |

The table below shows the functional currency of the Department's investments classed as available for sale. 

| 31 March                                   | 31 March    |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------|
| 2014                                       | 2013        |
| £000                                       | £000        |
| US dollars                                 | 2,100,489   |
| Euro                                       | 1,058,874   |
| Unit of account (African Development Bank) | 94,981      |
| Total                                      | 3,254,344   |

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.5 Liquidity Risk

The following tables show the maturity profile of the Department's financial assets and liabilities other than cash and equity investments 

Financial assets: maturity profile 
Due on demand Due within 1 year, but not on demand Due within 1 to 2 years 
Due within 2 to 3 years Due within 3 to 4 years Due within 4 to 5 years Due after 5 years 
Total 
Financial liabilities: maturity profile 
Due on demand 
3,520,143 
2,754,094 
Due within 1 year, but not on demand 
338,337 
256,523 
Due within 1 to 5 years 
- 
47,156 
Less interest element of finance lease 
(2,146) 
(10,886) 
Total 
3,856,334 
3,046,887 

## 11.6 Credit Risk

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk was as follows 

Fair value financial assets Loans and receivables Cash and cash equivalents 
Total 
|           | 31 March    |
|-----------|-------------|
| 2014      |             |
| 31 March  |             |
| 2013      |             |
| Note      | £000        |
| -         | -           |
| 11.1      | 13,981      |
| 12,355    | 14,397      |
| 10,947    | 12,633      |
| 9,388     | 9,029       |
| 8,285     | 6,758       |
| 28,998    | 31,604      |
| 83,954    | 91,540      |
| 31 March  | 31 March    |
| 2014      | 2013        |
| £000      | £000        |
| 31 March  |             |
| 2014      |             |
| 31 March  |             |
| 2013      |             |
| Note      | £000        |
| 11.1      | 3,254,344   |
| 11.5      | 83,954      |
| 12        | 24,109      |
| 3,362,407 | 3,332,984   |

## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.6 Credit Risk (Continued)

The Department's ageing analysis was as follows: 

Not past due Past due not provided against 
Total 

The movement in provisions against loans and receivables was as follows: 

Balance at 31 March 2012 
Reversal of provision Utilisation of provision 
Balance at 31 March 2013 
Reversal of provision 
Utilisation of provision 
Balance at 31 March 2014 

Bilateral loans, and loans formerly managed by Actis, are made directly with sovereign states; multilateral loans are made with sovereign states through multilateral bodies such as the European Investment Bank. Assessments of credit risk are based on default history, political risks and the potential future granting of debt relief. Credit risk on the Department's cash balances held within the Government Banking Service is considered to be very low. Imprest balances are held with various institutions, all of which are major global banks with high credit ratings. Investments in fair value financial assets are made through International Financial Institutions. Assessments of credit risk are based on audited financial statements provided by each institution on an annual basis. 

## 11.7 Market Risk Interest Rate Risk

The Department's interest rate risk arises primarily from loans made at a floating rate, and cash balances held overseas. Neither of these represent a significant source of income for the Department - total loan interest in 2013–14 amounted to £0.539m (2012–13: £0.701m). 

## Foreign Currency Risk

|     |     |     |     |     |     |
|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|

The Department's largest exposure in terms of net assets is in US dollar and Euro. On the statement of financial position, exchange gains on investments are taken to the revaluation reserve. Exchange losses are also charged to the revaluation reserve where a previously accumulated reserve is available; losses in excess of this reserve are charged to operating costs. As at 31 March 2014, £2.100m (2013: £2.177m) of the Depar tment's investments were denominated in US dollars and £1.058m (2013: £1.001m) in Euros. 

Exchange gains and losses on other financial assets and liabilities are charged to operating costs and are minimal based on the composition of assets and liabilities in foreign currency. At 31 March 2014, if sterling had weakened by 10% against the US dollar, with all other variables held constant, net assets would have decreased by £223.4m (2013: £243.3m). Net operating costs would have reduced by £1.021m (2013: £0.140m). At the same date if sterling had weakened by 10% against the Euro, with all other variables held constant, net assets would have decreased by £0.118m (2013: £0.113m) with an effect on net operating costs of nil (2013: £0.005m). During the year under review DFID did enter into arrangements to mitigate its exposure to currency risk on a large programme denominated in South African Rand where forward contracts were purchased to match milestone payments. At 31 March 2014 note 11.2 shows unrealised losses of £4.9m. In addition to this, as noted in 11.2, contracts matured during the year with realised losses of £3.9m which were reflected in operating costs.  

Net loans and receivables 
31 March 
31 March 
2014 
2013 
 
 
£000 
£000 
Note
(Restated) 
83,954 
91,539 
- 
- 
83,954 
91,539 
£000 
(108,312) 
15,375 
5,183 
(87,754) 
5,846 
13.1 
4,309 
(77,599) 


## 11. Financial Instruments (Continued) 11.7 Market Risk (Continued) Other Price Risk

The Department's investments in IFIs are based on share of the net assets of each IFI. Although there is no public traded market for these investments, changes in the underlying net asset values of the IFIs would impact on the investment value shown in these accounts. As at 31 March 2014, a 10% reduction in net asset values of the IFIs, with all other variables held constant, would result in the Department's net assets being reduced by £325m (2013: £315m).   
 
The Department's investment in CDC is based on the net assets. As at 31 March 2014, a 10% reduction in the net asset value of this organisation, with all other variables held constant, would result in the Department's net assets being reduced by £295m (2013: 283m). 

## 12. Cash And Cash Equivalents

31 March 
2013 
Departmental 
Group 
£000 
31 March 
2014 
Departmental 
Group 
£000 
DFID 
£000 
DFID 
£000 
Balance at 1 April 2013
 (48,618)
 (46,611)
 (3,029)
 (1,497) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalent balances 
72,727 
71,332 
(45,589)
 (45,114) 
Balance at 31 March 2014 
24,109 
24,721 
(48,618)
 (46,611) 

The following balances at 31 March 2014 were held at: 

| Government Banking Service - Core Department    | 16,677    | 16,677    | (50,226)   |  (50,226)    |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|------------|--------------|
| Government Banking Service - NDPBs              | -         | 612       | -          | 2,007        |
| Commercial banks                                | 7,432     | 7,432     | 1,608      | 1,608        |
| Balance at 31 March 2014                        | 24,109    | 24,721    | (48,618)   | (46,611)     |

Cash balances at the Government Banking Service were held in sterling. No interest is earned on cash balances held at the Government Banking Service. Imprest balances are held in a variety of local currencies. 

## 13. Trade And Other Receivables 13.1 Gross Value Less Provisions For Debt Relief And Non-Payment

Bilateral and 
Project capital 
multilateral 
loans 
loans 
Other loans 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
At 1 April 2013 
- 
80,775 
10,765 
91,540 
Issued in the year 
13,000 
- 
- 
13,000 
Repaid 
- 
(15,378) 
(1,369) 
(16,747) 
Decrease in provision 
- 
5,846 
- 
5,846 
Utilisation of provision 
- 
4,309 
20 
4,329 
Written off 
- 
(9,497) 
- 
(9,497) 
Foreign exchange loss 
- 
(1,702) 
- 
(1,702) 
Increase in borrowing costs 
(33) 
(1,859) 
(923) 
(2,815) 
At 31 March 2014 
12,967 
62,494 
8,493 
83,954  
Due within 1 year 
- 
(12,110) 
(1,871) 
(13,981)  
Total: other receivables falling due after more than 12 months* 
12,967 
50,384 
6,622 
69,973 
* Of  which 
Falling due after 1 year and  less than 2 years 
- 
10,129 
2,226 
12,355 
Falling due after 2 years and less than 3 years 
2,137 
7,290 
1,520 
10,947 
Falling due after 3 years and less than 4 years 
2,830 
5,875 
683 
9,388 
Falling due after 4 years and less than 5 years 
2,705 
4,888 
692 
8,285 
Falling due after 5 years 
5,295 
22,202 
1,501 
28,998 
12,967 
50,384 
6,622 
69,973 
Repayments included above 
–
 (15,378)
 (1,369)
 (16,747) 
Repayments included in non-operating income 
–
 (3,528)
 (1,369)
 (4,897) 
Principal repayments accrued 2013–14 
–
 (11,850) 
–
 (11,850) 
Included in statements of cash flow - note 21.2 
- 
(15,378) 
(1,369) 
(16,747) 

All receivables relate to DFID. CSC and ICAI do not hold any receivables. 

## 13. Trade And Other Receivables (Continued) 13.1 Gross Value Less Provisions For Debt Relief And Non-Payment (Continued)

Bilateral and 
multilateral 
loans 
Other loans 
Total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
At 1 April 2012 
80,542 
11,329 
91,871 
Repaid 
(15,975) 
(1,145) 
(17,120) 
Decrease in provision 
15,375 
- 
15,375 
Utilisation of provision 
5,183 
12,976 
18,159 
Written off 
(18,368) 
(12,976) 
(31,344) 
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain 
1,470 
- 
1,470 
Decrease in borrowing costs 
12,548 
581 
13,129 
At 31 March 2013 
80,775 
10,765 
91,540 
Due within 1 year 
(15,186) 
(1,934) 
(17,120) 
Total: other receivables falling due after more than 12 months* 
65,589 
8,831 
74,420 
* Of  which 
Falling due after 1 year and less than 2 years 
12,326 
2,071 
14,397 
Falling due after 2 years and less than 3 years 
10,394 
2,239 
12,633 
Falling due after 3 years and less than 4 years 
7,495 
1,534 
9,029 
Falling due after 4 years and less than 5 years 
6,067 
691 
6,758 
Falling due after 5 years 
29,307 
2,296 
31,603 
65,589 
8,831 
74,420 
Repayments included above
 (27,780)
 (1,145)
 (28,925) 
Repayments included in non-operating income 
Principal repayments accrued 2012–13
 (11,805) 
–
 (11,805) 
Included in statement of cash flows - note 21.4 
(15,975) 
(1,145) 
(17,120) 

## 13. Trade And Other Receivables (Continued) 13.2 Current Trade And Other Receivables - Analysis By Type

Loans repayable within 1 year Deposits and advances Prepayments and accrued income* Amounts due from the Consolidated Fund in respect of supply 
Total 

* Of which Nil relates to principal repayments on loans accrued ( 2012–13: £11.805 million). 

## 13.3 Intra-Government Balances

Amounts falling due 
within one year 
31 March 2014 
31 March 2013 
Balances with other central government bodies 
965 
55,385 
- 
- 
Balances with local authorities 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Balances with NHS bodies 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Balances with public corporations and trading funds 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Subtotal: intra-government balances 
965 
55,385 
- 
-  
Balances with bodies external to government 
137,038 
69,228 
69,973 
79,703  
Total receivable 
138,003 
124,613 
69,973 
79,703 

The above relates to assets held by DFID. CSC and ICAI do not hold any assets. 

| 31 March 2014            | 31 March 2013    |
|--------------------------|------------------|
| £000                     | £000             |
| 13,981                   | 17,120           |
| 26,076                   | 9,312            |
| 97,946                   | 43,811           |
| -                        | 54,370           |
| 138,003                  | 124,613          |
| Amounts falling due      |                  |
| after more than one year |                  |
| 31 March 2014            | 31 March 2013    |
| £000                     | £000             |

## 14. Trade Payables And Other Liabilities 14.1 Analysis By Type

| 31 March                                                | 31 March            |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| 2014                                                    | 2013                |
| Departmental                                            | Departmental        |
| DFID                                                    | Group               |
| £000                                                    | £000                |
| Amounts falling due within one year                     |                     |
| Taxation                                                | 2,825               |
| Other taxation and social security                      | 943                 |
| Other payables                                          | 19,112              |
| Accruals and deferred income                            | 270,495             |
| Current par                                             | t of finance leases |
| 338,337                                                 | 338,637             |
| Promissory notes: due on demand                         | 3,520,143           |
| Amounts issued from the Consolidated Fund               |                     |
| for supply but not spent at year end                    | 24,107              |
| Consolidated Fund extra receipts due to be paid to      |                     |
| the Consolidated Fund                                   |                     |
|                                                         | Received            |
| Receivable                                              | -                   |
| 3,882,589                                               | 3,882,889           |
| Amounts falling due after more than one year            |                     |
| Finance leases                                          | -                   |
| -                                                       | -                   |
| 14.2 Promissory notes payable: movement during the year |                     |
| £000                                                    | £000                |
| Balance at 1 April 2012                                 |                     |
| (2,588,734)                                             |                     |
| Charge to operating costs in 2012–13 - new deposits     | (1,408,547)         |
| Cash drawn down against notes previously issued         | 1,243,895           |
| Foreign exchange losses                                 | (707)               |
| (165,359)                                               |                     |
| Balance at 31 March 2013                                |                     |
| (2,754,093)                                             |                     |
| Charge to operating costs in 2013–14 - new deposits     | (1,903,072)         |
| Cash drawn down against notes previously issued         | 1,136,030           |
| Foreign exchange gains                                  | 992                 |
| (766,050)                                               |                     |
| Balance at 31 March 2014                                |                     |
| (3,520,143)                                             |                     |

Promissory notes payable have been classified as financial liabilities measured at amortised cost. They have been shown as due within 1 year, as they are legally payable on demand, so the maturity profile in the statement of financial position, and in note 11.5, shows the earliest date at which they could be payable. 

## 14. Trade Payables And Other Liabilities (Continued) 14.2 Promissory Notes Payable: Movement During The Year (Continued)

Promissory notes payable: analysis by institution at 31 March 2014 
31 March 
31 March 
2014 
2013 
Capital 
Resource 
Capital 
Resource 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
Other capital (Caribbean Development Bank and Asia Development Bank) 
23,072 
- 
17,688 
- 
International Development Association 
- 
1,957,508 
- 
1,693,146 
African Development Fund 
- 
504,364 
- 
471,457 
Global Environment Fund 
- 
127,927 
- 
116,116 
Asian Development Fund 
- 
88,958 
- 
78,833 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria 
- 
415,000 
- 
20,000 
Environmental Transformation Fund 
- 
249,113 
- 
236,113 
Comic Relief 
- 
- 
- 
1,397 
Caribbean Development Bank 
- 
9,000 
- 
8,839 
International Fund for Agricultural Development 
- 
122,368 
- 
100,000 
International Fund for Agricultural Development 
- 
8,681 
- 
10,504 
German Development Corporation 
- 
14,152 
- 
- 
Total 
23,072 
3,497,071 
17,688 
2,736,405 

 
DFID, being a central government department financed from the Consolidated Fund, does not face any significant liquidity risk on these liabilities. There are no material balances denominated in foreign currencies, so currency risk on these liabilities is not significant. Note 11 gives further details on these risks. 

## 14.3 Intra-Government Balances

| Amounts falling due                    | Amounts falling due after    |               |               |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| within one year                        | more than one year           |               |               |
| 31 March 2014                          | 31 March 2013                | 31 March 2014 | 31 March 2013 |
| £000                                   | £000                         | £000          | £000          |
| Balances with other central government |                              |               |               |
| bodies                                 | (30,096)                     | (10,166)      | -             |
| Balances with local authorities        | -                            | -             | -             |
| Balances with NHS bodies               | -                            | -             | -             |
| Balances with public corporations and  |                              |               |               |
| trading funds                          | -                            | -             | -             |
| Subtotal: intra-government balances    |                              |               |               |
| (30,096)                               | (10,166)                     | -             | -             |
| Balances with bodies external to       |                              |               |               |
| government                             | (3,852,493)                  | (3,006,202)   | -             |
| Total payables                         | (3,882,589)                  | (3,016,368)   | -             |

## 15. Provisions

IFFIm 
£000 
AMC 
£000 
Balance at 1 April 2012 
901,296 
92,734 
Provided in the year 
46,359 
Release of provision 
(8,826) 
Provision utilised in the year
(53,605)
 (11,343)
Borrowing costs 
172,904 
10,577 
Balance at 31 March 2013 
1,058,128 
91,968 
Provided in the year 
63,892 
72,780 
Release of provision 
- 
Provision utilised in the year
(63,341) 
(43,554)
Borrowing costs/unwinding 
of discount
(11,720)
 (14,293)
Balance at 31 March 2014 
1,046,959 
106,901 
 
 
Analysis of expected timing of discounted flows at 31 March 2014[1] 
IFFIm 
£000 
AMC 
£000 
No later than 1 year 
75,003 
66,500 
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years 
499,038 
40,401 
Later than 5 years 
472,918 
1,046,959 
106,901 
929 
3,193 
8,786 
1,166,768 


Analysis of expected timing of discounted flows at 31 March 2013[1] 
IFFIm 
£000 
AMC 
£000 
No later than one year 
64,901 
41,000 
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years 
354,600 
50,968 
Later than 5 years 
638,627 
1,058,128 
91,968 
2,887 
4,226 
11,104 
1,168,313 
 

[1] Only the provisions for IFFIm and AMC have been discounted on the basis that the impact of discounting would not be material on any of the other provisions. 

Provision for the International Finance Facility for Immunisations (IFFIm) represents the net present value of committed payments to cover the UK share of currently issued bonds. The discount rate used to generate the net present value is the real discount rate set by HM Treasury. IFFIm is an international development financing institution that is supported by sovereign donors. IFFIm will borrow operating funds in the international capital markets over the 10 years from 2006–07 backed by these pledges. The UK has pledged a total of £1,315 million through to 2026 with a fur ther £250 million through to 2030, representing 44.73% of the total amounts pledged at 31 March 2014. To date, 29 bond issues have now been made, giving a total liability including interest of £1,411 million. The UK is therefore liable for £1,047 million in net present value terms at 31 March 2014 (after deducting payments made), which will be covered by payment obligations through to 2023. Provision for Advance Market Commitments (AMC) represents the net present value of the UK share of supplier agreements signed. The discount rate used to generate the net present value is the real discount rate adjusted for inflation, set by HM Treasury
. The UK 
has pledged a total of $485 million, through to 2021. At 31st March 2014 this represented 32.3% of commitments made. Supplier agreements to facilitate vaccine demands have been signed with a value of $1,095 million, the UK share of this is $350.4 million. The net present value of this value after deducting payments already made is £107m, which will be covered by payment obligations up to 2015. Provisions for ATP agreements represent sums which DFID is committed to pay to the Export Credit Guarantees Depar tment (ECGD) 
for interest make-up and insurance premiums under former mixed credit agreements (Aid and Trade Provision) projects. The ATP scheme is effectively closed and will not significantly affect the amount of the provision. 

|            | ATP     |
|------------|---------|
| agreements |         |
| £000       |         |
| Early      |         |
| retirement |         |
| costs      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Other      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Total      |         |
| £000       |         |
| 4,970      | 5,400   |
| -          | 161     |
| -          | (165)   |
| (2,079)    | (2,121) |
| -          |         |
|            |         |
| 2,887      | 4,226   |
| -          | 1,444   |
| -          | -       |
| (1,492)    | (2,477) |
| (466)      | -       |
| 929        | 3,193   |
| ATP        |         |
| agreements |         |
| £000       |         |
| Early      |         |
| retirement |         |
| costs      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Other      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Total      |         |
| £000       |         |
| 929        | 1,165   |
| -          | 2,020   |
| -          | -       |
| ATP        |         |
| agreements |         |
| £000       |         |
| Early      |         |
| retirement |         |
| costs      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Other      |         |
| £000       |         |
| Total      |         |
| £000       |         |
| 1,492      | 1,245   |
| 1,395      | 2,975   |
| -          | -       |


## 15. Provisions (Continued)

Provisions for early retirement represent the full estimated cost of payments to be made by DFID to early retirees up to the normal retirement age. The timing of calls on the provision can be forecast with reasonable accuracy. The amount provided is uncer tain only to the extent that adjustments may need to be made for up-rating of benefits and for unexpected changes in the number of beneficiaries. 

 
Amounts provided are likely to be used within at most 10 years. Other provisions represent: 

(a)  
sums for rents payable by the University of Greenwich for property occupied by a former Executive Agency of the Department, when the work of the Agency was taken over by the University. The main lease by the Department is treated as a finance lease. The rent received is lower than the finance charges incurred by the Department under the main lease. The provision covers the shortfall of rents receivable against finance charges payable over the main lease period to 2014. 
(b)  
certain non-statutory pension obligations (most pension obligations for which DFID is responsible are included in the separate overseas superannuation account). 
(c) estimated liabilities at the 31st March 2014 of overseas offices in respect of terminal benefit payments to staff appointed in country
. 
The above relates to liabilities held by DFID. CSC do not hold any liabilities requiring disclosure. 

## 16. Contingent Assets And Contingent Liabilities 16.1 Contingent Assets

The Department has the following contingent assets. 

 
On 30 April 2012, DFID signed a binding sale agreement with Actis management in relation to disposing of its 40% shareholding in Actis LLP
. This sale agreement confirmed DFID's intention to dispose of this shareholding to the management of Actis LLP
, in exchange for cash payments totalling $13 million and a 10% interest in Actis managements' carried interest in Actis Fund 3 and a 7.5% interest in Actis managements' carried interest in Actis Fund 4. Carried interest refers to profits generated by the funds over the period only from the sale agreement date until the expiry of the funds. This is based on the performance of the fund as a whole but will only become payable once a predetermined hurdle rate (the minimum rate of return) has been achieved. As this target is based on investment market performance, in the future, it is not felt that the carried interest element of the sale proceeds can be valued reliably. As a result, DFID will recognise carried interest as additional sales revenue only when it has been calculated as payable and confirmed by an external audit of Actis LLP and the associated funds. 

## 16.2 Contingent Liabilities

Contingent liabilities of £489.9 million (2012–13: £1,862 million) exist in respect of contributions due to international organisations which have been subject to formal approval by Parliament but which are not yet supported either by promissory notes or cash payments. 

 
In addition to contingent liabilities disclosed above in accordance with IAS 37, the department discloses for parliamentary repor ting and accountability purposes certain contingent liabilities where the likelihood of a transfer of economic benefit is remote. These amount to £10,791.8 million (2012–13: £11,384.9 million) and comprise: 

Q £10,672.8 million (2012–13: £11,047.7 million) in respect of callable capital on investments in International Financial Institutions.  
Q £108.3 million (2012–13: £113.7 million) in respect of for the UK share of EU member states' collective guarantees of the European 
Investment Bank's lending under the Lome conventions and the parallel Council decisions on the Association of Overseas Countries and Territories. 
Q Maintenance of the value of subscriptions paid to capital stock of regional development banks and funds (unquantifiable); Q Indemnities in respect of the transfer of ownership of the Natural Resources Institute (unquantifiable); 
 
Q £10.7 million (2012–13: £223.5 million) in respect of other items over £100,000 (or lower, where required by specific statute) that do 
not arise in the normal course of business and which are repor 
ted to Parliament by departmental Minute prior to the Department 
entering into the arrangement. This includes a guarantee over a borrowing facility undertaken by a non UK overseas territory. 
It is not possible to quantify the financial impact of the above contingent liabilities at the Statement of Financial Position date due to uncer tain factors including the timings of outflows. DFID do not expect any reimbursements to occur in relation to the contingent liabilities identified. 

## 17. Losses And Special Payments 17.1 Losses Statement

2013–14 
Number of 
cases 
Total 
52 
404 
55 
1,201 
Details of cases over £300,000 
Cash losses 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Claims abandoned 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Administrative write-offs 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Fruitless payments 
- 
- 
2 
737 
Store losses 
- 
- 
- 
- 

The Department did not write off any losses greater than £300,000 during the year. 

A number of DFID-funded assets related to programmes located in South Sudan that have been lost as a result of the conflict which commenced in the country in December 2013. It is not currently safe to access all areas of the country due to the on-going instability and therefore the value of assets lost has not yet been quantified. We expect to evaluate the extent of the losses incurred once it is possible to access the areas of the country where the assets are located. It is likely that this will result in a write-off in a future accounting period. 

## 17.2 Special Payments

2013–14 
Number of 
cases 
Total value of special payments 
1 
2 
- 
- 
Details of cases over £300,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 

## 18. Related-Party Transactions

DFID is the 100 per cent shareholder in CDC Group plc.  DFID had no material transactions with CDC during the year. DFID had a 40 per cent interest in Actis LLP until 30 April 2012 at which point the Department entered into a binding sales agreement to dispose of this interest. This explained that DFID is entitled to a fixed amount which was payable on 1 May 2012 and 1 May 2013 
plus an element of carried interest dependant on the future performance of certain Actis funds.  The fixed element still to be paid is included within prepayments and accrued income set out within note 14. The carried interest element is reflected as a contingent asset within note 16. DFID had no other transactions with Actis LLP during the financial year to 31 March 2013 and 2014. DFID has had a number of transactions with other government departments and other central government bodies. These are undertaken under normal trading circumstances, at arms length, and are repor ted within DFID's net resource outturn. Amounts due to and from other government departments are disclosed separately in notes 13 and 14. No amounts have been written off during 2013–14 to or from other government departments. The largest volume of transactions, in frequency and value, have been with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A related par ty transaction took place during the year between the Depar tment and a staff member who is a related party of the Department by virtue of being a close family member of Mark Lowcock. The transaction related to salary costs which have been paid in accordance with civil service guidelines. To ensure this relationship was managed objectively, Mark Lowcock had no direct or indirect involvement in determining pay, position or promotion for the individual involved. The Department has put in place a process whereby should a situation arise in which the Accounting Officer would otherwise be involved in a decision that would directly affect this individual, he would play no role, but two Directors-General and a senior Cabinet Office official would agree on the course of action. Further to this, no minister, board member, key manager or other related party has undertaken any material transactions with the Department during the year. 

| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| £000       |            |
| 2012–13    |            |
| Number of  |            |
| cases      | £000       |

 

| 2013–14    | 2012–13    |
|------------|------------|
| £000       |            |
| 2012–13    |            |
| Number of  |            |
| cases      | £000       |


## 19. General Fund

The General Fund reflects the realised and unrealised balance of the cumulative difference between net operating costs and financing, provided by Parliament, adjusted for amounts payable to the Consolidated Fund. 

| General Fund at 31 March 2012                     |  (1,404,031)   |  (1,403,265)    |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------|
| Net operating cost for the year                   |                |                 |
| Net Parliamentary Funding                         |                |                 |
| 6,706,813                                         |                |                 |
| Supply reissued                                   |                |                 |
| Payable for supply                                |                |                 |
| Financing provided                                |                |                 |
| Notional cost within operating costs              |                |                 |
| Realised element of revaluation reserve           |                |                 |
| Operating income payable to the Consolidated Fund |                |                 |
| CFERs payable to the Consolidated Fund            |                |                 |
| Net decrease in the General Fund                  |                |                 |
| (319,730)                                         | (319,813)      |                 |
| General Fund at 31 March 2013                     | (1,723,761)    | (1,723,078)     |
| Net operating cost for the year                   |                |                 |
| Net Parliamentary Funding                         | 8,699,263      |                 |
| Net Parliamentary Funding - deemed                |                |                 |
| Supply reissued                                   |                |                 |
| Payable for supply                                |                |                 |
| Financing provided                                |                |                 |
| Notional cost within operating costs              |                |                 |
| Realised element of revaluation reserve           |                |                 |
| Operating income payable to the Consolidated Fund |                |                 |
| CFERs payable to the Consolidated Fund            |                |                 |
| Net decrease in the General Fund                  | (675,874)      | (676,245)       |
| General Fund at 31 March 2014                     | (2,399,635)    | (2,399,323)     |

[1] The Depar tment's total non-current liabilities and negative General Fund reflect the inclusion of liabilities falling due in future years. Under the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000, no money may be drawn from the Consolidated Fund other than that required for the service of the 

|             |             | Departmental    | Departmental    |
|-------------|-------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| DFID        | DFID        | Group           | Group           |
| £000        | £000        | £000            | £000            |
| (7,075,374) | (7,075,457) |                 |                 |
| 6,706,813   |             |                 |                 |
| -           | -           |                 |                 |
| 54,370      | 54,370      |                 |                 |
| 6,761,183   | 6,761,183   |                 |                 |
| 265         | 265         |                 |                 |
| 89          | 89          |                 |                 |
| (184)       | (184)       |                 |                 |
| (5,709)     | (5,709)     |                 |                 |
| (9,298,082) | (9,298,453) |                 |                 |
| 8,699,263   |             |                 |                 |
| (54,370)    | (54,370)    |                 |                 |
| -           | -           |                 |                 |
| (24,107)    | (24,107)    |                 |                 |
| 8,620,786   | 8,620,786   |                 |                 |
| 265         | 265         |                 |                 |
| 1,243       | 1,243       |                 |                 |
| (86)        | (86)        |                 |                 |
| -           | -           |                 |                 |

## 20. Revaluation Reserve

£000 
(Restated) 
Balance at 1 April 2012 
3,708,063 
Loss on revaluation - International Financial Institutions
 (27,769) 
Gain on revaluation - CDC 
227,800 
Gain on vehicles 
44 
Realised element to General Fund
 (89) 
Balance at 31 March 2013 
3,908,049 
Loss on revaluation - International Financial Institutions
 (73,669) 
Loss on vehicles
 (221) 
Gain on revaluation - CDC 
120,900 
Loss on revaluation - capital project investments
 (359) 
Realised element to General Fund
 (1,243) 
Balance at 31 March 2014 
3,953,457 

As discussed at Note 11, DFID have retrospectively applied a change in accounting policy related to the investment in CDC Group plc. DFID have elected to restate the financial statement comparatives for the years ending 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013. The impact of the restatement on the revaluation reserve is as follows: 

As previously 
reported 
£000 
As restated 
£000 
Revaluation reserve as at 31 March 2012 
1,872,899 
1,872,899 
Gain on revaluation - CDC 
- 
1,835,164 
At 1 April 2012 
1,872,899 
3,708,063 
At 1 April 2012 
1,872,899 
3,708,063 
Gain on revaluation - CDC 
- 
227,800 
At 31 March 2013 
1,872,899 
3,935,863 

## 21. Notes To The Statement Of Cash Flows 21.1 Reconciliation Of Comprehensive Net Expenditure To Operating Cash Flows

| 31 March                                                               | 31 March    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| 2014                                                                   | 2013        |
| (restated)                                                             |             |
| £000                                                                   | £000        |
| Net operating cost                                                     | (9,298,082) |
| Adjustments for non-cash transactions                                  | 162,360     |
| (Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables                     | (161,225)   |
|                                                                        |             |
| Movement in receivables for items not passing through the Statement of |             |
| Comprehensive Net Expenditure                                          | 54,370      |
| Decrease/(increase) in trade payables                                  | 795,709     |
|                                                                        |             |
| Movement in payables for items not passing through the Statement of    |             |
| Comprehensive Net Expenditure                                          | 29,858      |
| Working capital movement: capital items                                | (15,704)    |
| Use of provisions                                                      | (115,157)   |
| Net cash outflow from operating activities                             | (8,547,871) |

## 21.2 Cash Flows From Investing Activities

| 31 March                                     | 31 March                   |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| 2014                                         | 2013                       |
| £000                                         | £000                       |
| Purchase of intangible assets                | (2,982)                    |
| Purchase of property, vehicles and equipment | (8,481)                    |
| Proceeds of disposal of proper               | ty, vehicles and equipment |
| Additions to investments                     | (63,956)                   |
| Repayments from other bodies                 | -                          |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities   | (74,223)                   |

## 21.3 Cash Flows From Financing Activities

| 31 March                                           | 31 March    |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| 2014                                               | 2013        |
| £000                                               | £000        |
| From the Consolidated Fund (supply) - current year | 8,644,893   |
| From the Consolidated Fund (supply) - prior year   | 54,370      |
| Net financing                                      | 8,699,263   |

## 21. Notes To The Statement Of Cash Flows (Continued)

21.4 Analysis of capital expenditure, financial investments and associated Consolidated funds in excess of receipts (CFERs)  
Property, 
vehicles and 
equipment, 
and intangible 
assets 
Administration 
11,462 
- 
- 
11,462 
Programme: long term loans 
- 
- 
(28,597)
 (28,597) 
Programme: investments 
- 
37,951 
- 
37,951 
Other receipts 
- 
- 
(1,196)
 (1,196) 
Total 
11,462 
37,951 
 
 (29,793)
19,620 
Property, 
vehicles and 
equipment, 
and intangible 
assets 
Administration 
65,986 
- 
- 
65,986 
Programme: long term loans 
- 
- 
(40,730)
 (40,730) 
Programme: investments 
- 
34,003 
- 
34,003 
Other receipts 
- 
- 
(590)
 (590) 
Total 
65,986 
34,003 
(41,320) 
58,669 

## 22. Third Party Assets

The Department held the amounts shown below, which relate to cash provided to DFID by other development agencies as part of jointly funded programmes. These funds are held in the capacity of project manager/lead donor and are disbursed when required by the programme. These are not held in DFID's name and as such are not included in cash held by the Core Depar tment, as set out in note 12. 

The reduction in the balance from 31 March 2013 to the present is due to the contract for third party money being transferred from DFID to Crown Agents, who have taken on the responsibility for managing and controlling these funds; in place of DFID. The majority of projects and associated funds have now been transferred; however there is a residual balance remaining with DFID where the projects are due for completion within the next couple of months. 

| Amounts held in third party account    | 1,469    | 2,138    |
|----------------------------------------|----------|----------|
2013–14 
Investments 
and 
loans 
Appropriations 
in aid 
Net total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
 
2012–13 
Investments 
and 
loans 
Appropriations 
in aid 
Net total 
£000 
£000 
£000 
£000 
 


31 March 2013 
£000 
£000 

## 23. Entities Within The Departmental Accounting Boundary

The entities within the boundary during 2013–14 were as follows. DFID income and expenditure incorporated financing of the following non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), in full or in part, in the current financial year: 

## Executive Ndpb Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (Csc) Advisory Ndpb Independent Commission For Aid Impact (Icai)

Reconciliation of grant in aid to CSC from Core Department and other departments 
2013–14 
2012–13 
£000 
£000 
Core Department 
23,259 
20,550 
Other depar 
tments 
450 
490 
Total grant in aid to CSC 
23,709 
21,040 
Of  which 
Administration grant in aid 
1,761 
1,980 
Programme grant in aid 
21,948 
19,060 
23,709 
21,040 
CSC administrative expenditure 
1,769 
2,112 
CSC programme expenditure 
22,311 
19,011 
Total CSC expenditure 
24,080 
21,123 
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
 (1,395) 
475 
Increase in trade payables 
1,046 
(558) 
Decrease in receivables 
(22) 
- 
23,709 
21,040 
DFID income from other government departments to fund grant in aid payment
 (450)
 (490) 

ICAI is an advisory NDPB, whose spend is included within DFID's expenditure and is not required to be repor ted separately.  

## 24. Events After The Reporting Date

No non-adjusting events after the reporting date have been identified. These financial statements were authorised for issue on the same date that the Comptroller and Auditor General signed his certificate. 

## Analysis Of Departmental Expenditure Common Core Tables (Unaudited)

 
In line with Her Majesty's Treasury Public Expenditure System (PES) guidance on the preparation of 2013–14 Annual Repor t and Accounts, DFID has produced the following common core tables. Tables 7.1, 7.3 and 
7.4 cover the required period 2009–10 to 2015–16. Table 7.2 is required to cover 2013–14 alone. These tables summarise key performance information against prior years, budget and forecast information. The figures up to and including 2013–14 show the actual resource outturn for that year, and for 2014–15 onwards indicative planning figures are presented. These figures were informed by the spending review 2010 and revisions to provisional allocations made within the Autumn Statement. These provisional plans may be subject to revision, as DFID strategy is continually reviewed to ensure that aid is used most effectively. DFID's available programme resources are allocated to country or regional specific aid programmes, international aid programmes or other programmes in the annual resource round. This establishes an aid framework allocation, approved by the Secretary of State, which provides divisions within DFID with a firm budget for the current year. For full details on what the outturn for 2013–14 represents and how this was delivered, reference should be made to other narrative within the Annual Repor t and Accounts. 

An Excel version of these tables, as required by HM Treasury regulations, is included on DFID's external website. 

## Table 7.1: Public Spending

This table summarises Budgets and Outturn on a basis consistent with the Estimate Par t II section headings.  One adjustment has been made for the period 2009–10 to 2010–11 where capital grants are reflected in outturn as resource but are funded by capital. The revised format of note 2 now reflects this change to the Accounts. 

As a result of the new ministers appointed during 2010–11, a new basis of assessing aid delivery was formed. This allocates aid across 5 pillars. As outturn for the prior year was not based on this methodology it is not appropriate to restate these figures on this basis. As a result the original Estimate headings are displayed for outturn from 2009–10 to 2010–11, with only Plan data shown on the new basis. This is consistent with information available on Online System for Central Accounting and Repor ting (OSCAR). 

£000 
2009–10 
2010–11 
Basis for 2009–10 to 2010–11 
Outturn 
Outturn 
Resources (excluding capital grants)  
5,003,799 
5,318,663  
RfR1: Eliminating Poverty in Poorer Countries 
Of  which: 
Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limits 
4,624,050 
5,004,383 
A: Bilateral Aid to Africa
 1,480,352 
1,557,019 
 
 
B: Bilateral Aid to South Asia
 735,452 
759,785 
 
C: Bilateral Aid to the Rest of the World
 389,997 
369,988 
 
 
D: Improve the Effectiveness of Multilateral Aid
 1,247,422 
1,599,045 
 
 
E: Develop a Global Par 
tnership for Development
 355,850 
385,239 
 
 
F: Central Departments
 314,977 
83,307 
 
 
G: Environment Transformation Fund
 100,000 
250,000 
 
 
Multiple Objectives 
- 
- 
 
Gibraltar Social Insurance Fund 
- 
- 
 
 
Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure 
379,749 
314,280 
 
 
H: Programmes Contributing to Multiple Objectives
 145,931 
6,020 
I: Grants to the International Finance Facility for Immunisation
 233,818 
224,481 
 
J: Provision for Advance Market Commitment 
- 
83,779 
  


Central departments 
- 
- 
 
 
EU Research Grants 
- 
- 
RfR2: Conflict Prevention 
16,715 
15,652 
A: Conflict Prevention and Stabilisation 
16,715 
15,652 
Total 
5,020,514 
5,334,315 

## Table 7.1: Public Spending (*Continued*)

|                                                                  |           |           | New basis from 2011–12    | £000      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|---------------------------|-----------|
| 2011–12                                                          | 2012–13   | 2013–14   | 2014–15                   | 2015–16   |
| Outturn                                                          | Outturn   | Outturn   | Plans                     | Plans     |
| 1                                                                |           |           |                           |           |
| Resources (excluding capital grants)                             |           |           |                           |           |
| Of  which:                                                       |           |           |                           |           |
| Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limits                      | 6,183,532 | 6,129,662 | 8,088,379                 | 7,870,142 |
| A: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating to developing countries | 18,189    | 20,633    | 24,080                    | 27,284    |
|                                                                  |           |           |                           |           |
| B: Wealth Creation                                               | 421,231   | 419,247   | 575,108                   | 646,608   |
| C: Climate Change                                                | 157,831   | 268,620   | 271,311                   | 285,555   |
| D: Governance and Security                                       | 720,291   | 696,928   | 735,505                   | 725,796   |
| E: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development Goals               | 2,183,444 | 2,388,532 | 4,295,992                 | 4,066,601 |
| F: Global Partnerships                                           | 1,529,331 | 1,333,672 | 1,262,056                 | 895,972   |
| G: Total Operating Costs                                         | 207,944   | 236,269   | 239,280                   | 234,396   |
| H: Central Programmes                                            | (13,128)  | (13,290)  | (19,860)                  | 17,500    |
| I: Joint Conflict Pool                                           | 21,570    | 18,892    | 29,416                    | 39,150    |
| J: Independent Commission for Aid Impact (NDPB) (net)            | 2,116     | 2,914     | 3,653                     | 4,280     |
|                                                                  |           |           |                           |           |
| K: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating to developed countries  | 588       | -         | -                         | -         |
| No Specific Pillar                                               | -         | -         | -                         | -         |
| Departmental Unallocated Provision                               | -         | -         | -                         | -         |
| Non-voted                                                        |           |           |                           |           |
| L: European Union Attributed Aid                                 | 934,125   | 757,245   | 671,838                   | 927,000   |
| Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure                         | 43,960    | 138,590   | 68,995                    | 339,985   |
| Voted                                                            |           |           |                           |           |
| -                                                                |           |           |                           |           |
| M: Wealth Creation                                               | (2,723)   | (2,084)   | 38,071                    | (927)     |
| N: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development Goals               | 41,052    | 156,067   | 3,769                     | 314,866   |
| O: Total Operating Costs                                         | (3,927)   | (3,748)   | (2,722)                   | (1,154)   |
| P: Central Programmes                                            | 9,558     | (11,645)  | 9,320                     | 27,200    |
| Q: Climate Change                                                | -         | -         | 20,557                    | -         |
|                                                                  |           |           |                           |           |
| No Specific Pillar                                               | -         | -         | -                         | -         |
| Total                                                            | 6,227,492 | 6,268,252 | 8,157,374                 | 8,210,127 |
|                                                                  |           |           |                           |           |

1 
 
DFID is in the process of conducting a resource allocation round for 2015–16 and beyond. As this is still underway, we are unable to provide a detailed breakdown of the categories that budget will be allocated to. 

## Table 7.1: Public Spending (*Continued*)

|                                                                  | CAPITAL                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Basis for 2009–10 to 2010–11                                     |                          |
| Resources (including capital grants)                             |                          |
| RfR1: Eliminating Poverty in Poorer Countries                    |                          |
| Of  which:                                                       |                          |
| Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limits                      |                          |
| A: Bilateral Aid to Africa                                       | 110,313                  |
| B: Bilateral Aid to South Asia                                   | 55,796                   |
| C: Bilateral Aid to the Rest of the World                        | 13,631                   |
| D: Improve the Effectiveness of Multilateral Aid                 | 1,060,382                |
| E: Develop a Global Par                                          | tnership for Development |
| F: Central Departments                                           | (12,044)                 |
| G: Environment Transformation Fund                               | -                        |
| Multiple Objectives                                              |                          |
| Gibraltar Social Insurance Fund                                  | -                        |
| Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure                         | -                        |
| H: Programmes Contributing to Multiple Objectives                | -                        |
| I: Grants to the International Finance Facility for Immunisation | -                        |
| J: Provision for Advance Market Commitment                       | -                        |
|                                                                  |                          |
| Central Departments                                              |                          |
| EU Research Grants                                               | -                        |
| RfR2: Conflict Prevention                                        | -                        |
| A: Conflict Prevention and Stabilisation                         | -                        |
| Total                                                            | 1,352,642                |
£000 
2009–10 
2010–11 
Outturn 
Outturn 
1,352,642 
1,758,696  
1,352,642 
1,758,696 

## Table 7.1: Public Spending (*Continued*)

| CAPITAL                                                          | £000      |           |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|
| New basis from 2011–12                                           |           |           |
| 2011–12                                                          | 2012–13   | 2013–14   |
| Outturn                                                          | Outturn   | Outturn   |
| Resources (including capital grants)                             |           |           |
| Of  which:                                                       |           |           |
| Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limits                      | 1,645,907 | 1,653,213 |
| A: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating to developing countries | -         | -         |
| B: Wealth Creation                                               | 127,995   | 194,279   |
| C: Climate Change                                                | 67,084    | 54,295    |
| D: Governance and Security                                       | 18,508    | 13,808    |
| E: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development Goals               | 117,353   | 70,115    |
| F: Global Partnerships                                           | 1,323,535 | 1,315,993 |
| G: Total Operating Costs                                         | -         | -         |
| H: Central Programmes                                            | (8,568)   | 4,724     |
| I: Joint Conflict Pool                                           | -         | -         |
| J: Independent Commission for Aid Impact (NDPB) (net)            | -         | -         |
|                                                                  |           |           |
| K: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating to developing countries | -         | -         |
| No Specific Pillar                                               | -         | -         |
| Departmental Unallocated Provision                               | -         | -         |
| Non-voted                                                        |           |           |
| L: European Union Attributed Aid                                 | -         | -         |
| Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure                         |           |           |
| -                                                                | -         | -         |
| Voted                                                            |           |           |
| M: Wealth Creation                                               | -         | -         |
| N: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development Goals               | -         | -         |
| O: Total Operating Costs                                         | -         | -         |
| P: Central Programmes                                            | -         | -         |
| Total                                                            | 1,645,907 | 1,653,214 |

## Table 7.2: Public Spending Control

This table sets out DFID's outturn for 2013–14, by subhead detail against the total budgetary control limits approved by Parliament at Main Estimate and at final Supplementary Estimate.  

£000 
Resources 
Main Estimate Supplementary 
Forecast 
Variance from 
Variance from 
Estimate 
outturn 
Main Estimate Supplementary 
Estimate 
Voted Expenditure 
8,576,500 
8,469,888 
8,088,379 
488,121 
381,509 
A: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship 
37,454 
37,454 
24,080 
13,374 
13,374 
relating to developing countries
B: Wealth Creation
 754,407 
697,968 
575,108 
179,299 
122,860 
C: Climate Change 
457,444 
305,355 
271,311 
186,133 
34,044 
D: Governance and Security
 684,608 
663,922 
735,505 
(50,897) 
(71,583) 
E: Direct Delivery of Millennium 
3,246,161 
4,377,613 
4,295,992 
(1,049,831) 
81,621 
Development Goals
F: Global Par 
tnerships
 1,887,249 
1,157,483 
1,262,056 
625,193 
(104,573) 
G: Total Operating Costs
 247,419 
247,019 
239,280 
8,139 
7,739 
H: Central Programmes
 5,675 
1,675 
(19,860) 
25,535 
21,535 
I: Joint Conflict Pool
 34,500 
27,250 
29,416 
5,084 
(2,166) 
J:   
Independent Commission for Aid 
4,256 
4,256 
3,653 
603 
603 
Impact (NDPB) (net)
K: No Specific Pillar
 208,871 
- 
–
 208,871 
- 
Departmental Unallocated Provision 
98,456 
39,893 
–
 98,456 
39,893 
Non-voted 
L: European Union Attributed Aid
 910,000 
910,000 
671,838 
238,162 
238,162 
Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure 
Voted 
291,600 
191,524 
68,995 
222,605 
122,529 
M: Wealth Creation 
(1,492) 
(1,492) 
38,071 
(39,563) 
(39,563) 
N: Direct Delivery of Millennium 
269,035 
158,105 
3,769 
265,266 
154,336 
Development Goals
O: Total Operating Costs 
(3,743) 
(3,439) 
(2,722) 
(1,021) 
(717) 
P: Central Programmes
 27,800 
38,350 
9,320 
18,480 
29,030 
Q: Climate Change 
- 
–
 20,557 
(20,557) 
(20,557) 
Total 
8,868,100 
8,661,412 
8,157,374 
710,726 
504,038 

## Table 7.2: Public Spending Control (*Continued*)

| Capital                            | Main Estimate Supplementary    | Forecast    | Variance from    | Variance from    |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------|------------------|------------------|
| Voted Expenditure                  |                                |             |                  |                  |
| 1,925,000                          | 1,969,442                      | 1,945,584   | (20,584)         | 23,858           |
| A: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship    | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| relating to developing countries   |                                |             |                  |                  |
| B: Wealth Creation                 | 274,417                        | 409,044     | 302,403          | (27,986)         |
| C: Climate Change                  | 76,550                         | 107,461     | 75,354           | 1,196            |
| D: Governance and Security         | 1,094                          | 10,271      | 11,086           | (9,992)          |
| E: Direct Delivery of Millennium   | 93,388                         | 62,607      | 51,483           | 41,905           |
| Development Goals                  |                                |             |                  |                  |
| F: Global Par                      | tnerships                      | 1,471,160   | 1,379,059        | 1,508,583        |
| G: Total Operating Costs           | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| H: Central Programmes              | 1,000                          | 1,000       | (3,325)          | 4,325            |
| I: Joint Conflict Pool             | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| J:                                 | Independent Commission for Aid | -           | -                | -                |
| Impact (NDPB) (net)                |                                |             |                  |                  |
| K: No Specific Pillar              | 7,391                          | -           | -                | 7,391            |
| Departmental Unallocated Provision | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Non-voted                          |                                |             |                  |                  |
| L: European Union Attributed Aid   | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Spending in Annually Managed       | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Expenditure                        |                                |             |                  |                  |
| Voted                              |                                |             |                  |                  |
| M: Wealth Creation                 | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| N: Direct Delivery of Millennium   | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Development Goals                  |                                |             |                  |                  |
| O: Total Operating Costs           | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| P: Central Programmes              | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Q: Climate Change                  | -                              | -           | -                | -                |
| Total                              | 1,925,000                      | 1,969,442   | 1,945,584        | (20,584)         |
£000 
Estimate 
outturn 
Main Estimate Supplementary 
Estimate 

## Table 7.3: Capital Employed

The table below summarises DFID's Statement of Financial Position. PES (2012) 17 requires depar tments to publish plan data for the next 2 years. The most significant values on DFID's Statement of Financial Position are based on values provided by external par ties, such as investment values. No plan information relating to future performance of these factors is available. In addition, other areas such as provisions and payables <1 year (including promissory notes) will vary depending on the programmes funded over the next 4 years and funding mechanisms used. As a result DFID has had to make assumptions to determine a future value for a number of areas within the Statement of Financial Position. Consistent with the preparation of the 2013-14 Annual Repor t and Accounts, 2012-2013 Outturn has been restated to reflect a change in accounting policy relating to CDC Group plc. 

£000 
2009–10 
2010–11 
2011–12 
2012–13 
2013–14 
2014–15 
2015–16 
Outturn 
Outturn
 Outturn
 Outturn 
Outturn 
Plans 
Plans 
(Restated)
Assets and liabilities on the Statement of Financial Position at end of year: Assets Non-current assets 
Property, vehicles and equipment
 92,724 
87,085 
83,166 
122,827 
120,092 
34,747 
22,440 
Of  which: 
Land and buildings (including leasehold 
61,111 
61,796 
55,234 
89,016 
86,587 
15,570 
4,960 
improvements) Vehicles
 2,748 
2,256 
1,879 
2,206 
2,365 
1,183 
591 
Office and domestic furniture and 
8,885 
8,815 
7,934 
9,321 
6,904 
5,523 
4,419 
equipment IT equipment and systems
 11,205 
6,617 
4,177 
4,039 
3,882 
7,382 
8,654 
Assets in the course of construction
 8,775 
7,601 
13,942 
18,245 
20,354 
5,089 
3,816 
Intangible
 24,602 
21,867 
21,380 
22,675 
21,753 
17,947 
14,141 
Investments
 3,813,655 
3,867,211 
4,048,864 
6,118,062 
6,229,249 
8,272,249 10,886,249 
Trade and other receivables > 1 year
 128,964 
111,419 
79,703 
74,420 
69,973 
58,000 
46,000 
Current assets 
Financial assets 
- 
- 
1,678 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Trade and other receivables < 1 year 
361,771 
157,344 
71,768 
124,613 
138,003 
138,000 
138,000 
Cash and cash equivalents
 4,199 
3,605 
2,880 
1,608 
24,109 
9,109 
9,000 
Liabilities 
Current < 1 year 
(1,758,952) (2,505,030) (2,855,959) (3,186,336) (4,034,972) (3,990,000) (3,945,000) 
Non-current > 1 year 
(46,454) 
(46,766) 
(46,210) 
(45,010) 
- 
- 
- 
Provisions 
(674,280) 
(914,826) 
(938,402) (1,048,571) (1,014,385) 
(988,000) 
(961,500) 
Capital employed within the main 
1,946,229 
781,909 
468,868 
2,184,288 
1,553,822 
3,552,052 
6,209,330 
Department
NDPB net assets 
- 
- 
766 
683 
334 
300 
300 
Total capital employed in Departmental 
1,946,229 
781,909 
469,634 
2,184,971 
1,554,156 
3,552,352 
6,209,630 
Group

## Table 7.4: Administration Budgets

The table below shows published Administration Budget outturn for the past 5 years (including year just ended) and Spending Review plans for the next 2 years. 

 
In accordance with the Business Plan and Structural Reform Plan, DFID has moved its internal basis of monitoring to a 5 pillar approach. The headings on the Estimate and focus of plans have been aligned to these pillars. It is not considered appropriate to restate prior years' outturns on this basis as these pillars were not used for strategic decision-making. 

| 2009–10                                          | 2010–11                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Outturn                                          | Outturn                                          |
| Headings for 2009–10 to 2010–11                  |                                                  |
| Eliminating Poverty in Poorer Countries          |                                                  |
| A: Bilateral Aid to Africa                       | 19,370                                           |
| B: Bilateral Aid to South Asia                   | 12,203                                           |
| C: Bilateral Aid to the Rest of the World        | 12,679                                           |
| D: Improve the Effectiveness of Multilateral Aid | 14,603                                           |
| E: Develop a Global Partnership for Development  | 19,978                                           |
| F: Central Departments                           | 76,220                                           |
|                                                  |                                                  |
| G: Environment Transformation Fund               | -                                                |
|                                                  |                                                  |
| Spending In Annually Managed Expenditure         |                                                  |
| -                                                | -                                                |
| Objectives                                       |                                                  |
| -                                                | -                                                |
|                                                  |                                                  |
| I:                                               | Grants to the International Finance Facility for |
| Immunisation                                     |                                                  |
| J: Provision for Advance Market Commitment       | -                                                |
|                                                  |                                                  |
| Central Departments                              | -                                                |
|                                                  |                                                  |
| Total RfR1                                       | 155,053                                          |
| Conflict Prevention                              |                                                  |
| A: Conflict Prevention and Stabilisation         | 3,996                                            |
| Total RfR2                                       | 3,996                                            |
| Total RfR 1 and 2                                | 159,049                                          |

## Table 7.4: Administration Budgets (*Continued*)

| 2009–10                                      | 2010–11    | 2011–12    | 2012–13    | 2013–14    | 2014–15    | 2015–16    |
|----------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|------------|
| Outturn                                      | Outturn    | Outturn    | Outturn    | Outturn    | Plans      | Plans      |
|                                              |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| New basis from 2011–12                       |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Resources                                    |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Of  which:                                   |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Spending in Departmental Expenditure Limits  |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          |            |            |            |            |            |
| 123,345                                      | 127,815    | 115,973    | 115,200    |            |            |            |
| 112,700                                      |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| A: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating     |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          |            |            |            |            |            |
| 1,942                                        | 2,112      | 1,769      | 1,724      | -          |            |            |
| to developing countries                      |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| B: Wealth Creation                           | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| C: Climate Change                            | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| D: Governance and Security                   | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| E: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Goals                                        |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| F: Global Partnerships                       | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| G: Total Operating Costs                     | -          | -          | 120,989    | 125,298    | 113,728    | 95,496     |
| H: Central Programmes                        | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          |            |            |            |            |            |
| 17,500                                       | 18,000     |            |            |            |            |            |
| I: Joint Conflict Pool                       | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| J: Independent Commission for Aid Impact     | -          | -          | 303        | 405        | 476        | 480        |
|                                              |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| (NDPB) (net)                                 |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| K: CSC (NDPB) (net) scholarship relating to  | -          | -          | 111        |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| developing countries                         |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Non-voted                                    |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| L: European Union Attributed Aid             | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure     |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Voted                                        |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| M: Wealth Creation                           | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| N: Direct Delivery of Millennium Development | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Goals                                        |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| O: Total Operating Costs                     | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| P: Central Programmes                        | -          | -          | -          |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          | -          |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| Total                                        |            |            |            |            |            |            |
| -                                            | -          |            |            |            |            |            |
| 123,345                                      | 127,815    | 115,973    | 115,200    | 112,700    |            |            |
£000 

## Table 7.5: Staff In Post

|                     | Mar-09    | Mar-10    | Mar-11    | Mar-12    | Mar-13    | Mar-14    |
|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Home civil servants | 1,600     | 1,573     | 1,567     | 1,562     | 1,764     | 1,863     |

Table 7.5 shows the number of full-time equivalent Civil Ser vice staff employed by DFID in the UK and overseas, including those working overseas on aid projects. Par t-time staff are counted according to percentage of time worked. Note 3 to the Accounts shows the average number of full-time equivalents employed during the year and includes locally engaged staff overseas, as required by the 2013–14 Government Financial Repor ting Manual. This is why the totals differ. 

## Administration Consulting And Administration Temporary Staff

Total spend by DFID during 2013–14 on administration consultancy was £82,011 (2012–13: £4,588,616), and the spend on other administration temporary staff was £1,903,506 (2012–13: £1,875,482). The numbers in the table and note above consist of Core Depar tment only. No staff are employed by the Depar tment's NDPBs. 

## Dfid Allocations By Programme

DFID's available programme resources are allocated to country or regional specific aid programmes, international aid programmes or other programmes in the annual resources and results cycle. This establishes an aid framework allocation, approved by the Secretary of State, which provides divisions within DFID with a firm budget for the current year and indicative budgets for future years. Table A.1 sets out the Depar tment's actual programme resource outturn for 2013–14, and for 2014–15 
indicative planning figures are presented. These plans may be subject to revision as, by its nature, the Depar tment's work is dynamic. The precise way in which DFID spends will reflect changing demands and the speed at which different projects are implemented and new projects developed. Figures may not sum exactly to totals due to rounding. DFID's par tnership with India and South Africa is in transition; DFID will honour commitments to existing projects, all of which will finish in 2015. 

AFRICA East and Central Africa 
Africa Regional Department 
183,981 
2,855 
147,269 
DFID Burundi 
10
 
–
 
–
DFID Ethiopia 
288,335 
3,975 
341,690 
DFID Kenya 
139,309 
3,147 
108,431 
DFID Rwanda 
88,099 
2,311 
74,218 
DFID Tanzania 
178,828 
3,651 
165,591 
DFID Uganda 
97,417 
2,699 
86,337 
DFID Sudan 
50,582 
2,538 
48,400 
DFID South Sudan 
143,088 
3,441 
137,651 
DFID Somalia 
87,113 
3,488 
107,331 
East and Central Africa TOTAL 
1,256,762 
28,105 
1,216,917 
West and Southern Africa 
Africa Directorate 
1,399 
1,013 
18,125 
DFID DRC 
167,266 
5,100 
159,039 
DFID Malawi 
87,158 
2,021 
61,867 
DFID Mozambique 
80,123 
2,724 
66,627 
DFID Southern Africa 
53,208 
2,904 
64,937 
DFID Zambia 
68,999 
2,377 
62,137 
DFID Zimbabwe 
108,643 
2,649 
75,998 
DFID Ghana 
92,962 
2,117 
73,885 
DFID Nigeria 
274,745 
8,584 
233,900 
DFID Sierra Leone and Liberia 
80,194 
2,592 
66,420 
West and Southern Africa Total 
1,014,697 
32,080 
882,934 
Africa TOTAL 
2,271,459 
60,185 
2,099,851 
| 2013–14         | 2013–14    | 2014–15    |
|-----------------|------------|------------|
| Total           |            |            |
| programme       |            |            |
| outturn         |            |            |
| Of which: Front |            |            |
| line delivery   |            |            |
| outturn         | Plans      |            |
| (£000)          | (£000)     | (£000)     |
| 2013–14                                                | 2013–14             | 2014–15    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|
| Total                                                  |                     |            |
| programme                                              |                     |            |
| outturn                                                |                     |            |
| Of which: Front                                        |                     |            |
| line delivery                                          |                     |            |
| outturn                                                | Plans               |            |
| (£000)                                                 | (£000)              | (£000)     |
| Asia, Caribbean and Overseas Territories               |                     |            |
| DFID Cambodia                                          | 4,891               | -          |
| DFID Bangladesh                                        | 265,679             | 3,528      |
| DFID Burma                                             | 71,417              | 1,732      |
| DFID India                                             | 173,514             | 4,365      |
| DFID Nepal                                             | 107,376             | 2,652      |
| DFID Vietnam                                           | 16,995              | 1,068      |
| DFID Indonesia                                         | 14,476              | 988        |
| Asia Division London                                   | 263                 | 263        |
| DFID Caribbean                                         | 16,176              | 1,851      |
| Overseas Territories Depar                             | tment               | 118,937    |
| Asia Regional Team                                     | 29,642              | 626        |
| Global Development Par                                 | tnerships Programme | 6,402      |
| Global Development Partnerships Programme - India      | 8,512               | -          |
| Asia, Caribbean and Overseas Territories TOTAL         | 834,281             | 20,645     |
| Western Asia and Stabilisation Division                |                     |            |
| West Asia Department                                   | 265                 | 265        |
| DFID Afghanistan                                       | 193,586             | 11,331     |
| DFID Pakistan                                          | 259,512             | 6,522      |
| Stabilisation Unit                                     | 15,919              | 4,279      |
| DFID Tajikistan                                        | 9,709               | 930        |
| DFID Kyrgyz Republic                                   | 4,683               | -          |
| DFID Ukraine                                           | -                   | -          |
| Western Asia and Stabilisation Division TOTAL          | 483,674             | 23,328     |
| Middle East and North Africa Division                  |                     |            |
| DFID Jerusalem and Palestinian Programme               | 95,369              | 1,510      |
| DFID Syria                                             | 294,960             | 445        |
| DFID MENAD Regional                                    | 50,481              | 2,541      |
| DFID Yemen                                             | 82,232              | 857        |
| Middle East Humanitarian and Conflict Directors Office | -                   | -          |
| Middle East and North Africa Division TOTAL            | 523,041             | 5,353      |
| Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Division           |                     |            |
| Conflict Funds                                         | 3,550               | -          |
| Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department         | 395,105             | 2,333      |
| Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Division TOTAL     |                     |            |
| 398,655                                                | 2,333               | 312,771    |
| Country/Regional Programme TOTAL                       |                     |            |
| 4,511,109                                              | 111,844             | 4,111,696  |
| International Finance Division                         |                     |            |
| Multilateral Effectiveness Department                  | 1,376               | 161        |
| Private Sector Department                              | 212,900             | 262        |
| World Bank Programme                                   | 1,105,000           | -          |
| Regional Development Banks                             | 286,379             | -          |
| HIPC, Debt Relief                                      | 81,773              | -          |
| IMF                                                    | 9,900               | -          |
| Global Funds Department                                | 1,121,945           | 108        |
| International Finance Division TOTAL                   | 2,819,273           | 604        |
| 2013–14                                                   | 2013–14    | 2014–15    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| Total                                                     |            |            |
| programme                                                 |            |            |
| outturn                                                   |            |            |
| Of which: Front                                           |            |            |
| line delivery                                             |            |            |
| outturn                                                   | Plans      |            |
| (£000)                                                    | (£000)     | (£000)     |
| International Relations Division                          |            |            |
| European Commission Attribution                           | 671,838    | -          |
| United Nations and Commonwealth Department                | 347,211    | 133        |
| Global Partnerships Department                            | 4,164      | 1,063      |
| Europe Department                                         | 409,830    | -          |
| International Relations Division Total                    | 1,433,043  | 1,196      |
| International Divisions TOTAL                             | 4,252,389  | 1,800      |
| Policy Division                                           |            |            |
| Civil Society Department                                  | 188,396    | 367        |
| Policy and Research Cabinet                               | 19,453     | -          |
| Governance, Open Societies and Anti-Corruption Department | 45,645     | 943        |
| Growth and Resilience Depar                               | tment      | 56,110     |
| Human Development Group                                   | 293,958    | 1,771      |
| Climate and Environment Group                             | 212,213    | 1,661      |
| Trade Policy Unit                                         | 8,576      | 32         |
| Policy Division TOTAL                                     | 824,352    | 5,668      |
| Research and Evidence Division                            |            |            |
| Evaluation Department                                     | 18,389     | -          |
| Research and Evidence                                     | 308,541    | 5,934      |
| Chief Economist Office                                    | 5,853      | 595        |
| Research and Evidence Division TOTAL                      | 332,783    | 6,529      |
| Policy and Research TOTAL                                 | 1,157,135  | 12,197     |
| Corporate Performance Group TOTAL                         | 64,313     | 2,760      |
| Central costs                                             | -63,630    | 1,230      |
| TOTAL                                                     | 9,921,316  | 129,831    |

## Annual Reporting Of Statistical Information

 
B.1  
The International Development (Repor 
ting and Transparency) Act 2006 requires the Secretary of 
State for International Development to repor 
t to Parliament on an annual basis. The schedule to the 
Act sets out the statistical repor 
ting that is required. This information is published each autumn for the 
preceding year in DFID's publication Statistics on International Development. Provisional figures for 2013 are provided in the following tables. 
B.2  
The statistical repor 
ting requirements of the Act are itemised below with the tables within this Annex 
showing where the corresponding information can be located. Information is included for the most recent period and each of the four periods before. Figures may not sum exactly to totals due to rounding. 

| Act schedule                                                                       | Table number    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| Total UK bilateral aid broken down by:                                             |                 |
| Debt relief, in turn split by cancelled expor                                      | t credits       |
| Region                                                                             | Table B.2       |
| Country including humanitarian assistance breakdown                                | Table B.2       |
| Sector                                                                             | Table B.3       |
| Country as a percentage of UK bilateral aid                                        | Table B.2       |
| Percentage and amount to low income countries                                      | Table B.2       |
| Percentage of gross national income (GNI)                                          | Table A.6       |
| UK multilateral aid broken down by:                                                |                 |
| European Union                                                                     | Table B.1       |
| World Bank                                                                         | Table B.1       |
| United Nations and its agencies                                                    | Table B.1       |
| Other multilateral organisations                                                   | Table B.1       |
| UK imputed share                                                                   |                 |
| 1                                                                                  |                 |
| of the aggregate amount of multilateral official development assistance (ODA)      |                 |
| provided by the bodies to which the UK contributed such assistance broken down by: |                 |
| Country                                                                            | Table B.4       |
| Percentage and amount to low income countries                                      | Table B.4       |

[1] UK imputed share is the share of all multilateral expenditure in developing countries which can be attributed to the UK. 

£ millions 
2009 
2010 
2011 
2012 
2013[1] 
Total bilateral ODA
 4,732 
5,191 
5,286 
5,524 
6,666 
as a % of GNI 
0.33 
0.35 
0.34 
0.36 
0.42 
of  which: Administration costs[2]
 254 
238 
258 
333 
232 
Debt relief 
27
 106
 113
 71
 36 
Export Credit Guarantee Agency 
7
 54
 91
 20
 30 

 
 
Total multilateral ODA
 2,491 
3,261 
3,343 
3,242 
4,771 
as a % of GNI 
0.18 
0.22 
0.22 
0.21 
0.30 
of  which: Total European Commission
 1,245 
1,301 
1,184 
1,169 
1,274 
Total World Bank
 555 
933 
1,086 
797 
1,609 
Total UN agencies
 297 
371 
367 
419 
443 
Total other organisations[3]
 394 
656 
706 
858 
1,445 


TOTAL ODA
 7,223 
8,452 
8,629 
8,766 
 11,437 
as a % of GNI 
0.51 
0.57 
0.56 
0.56 
0.72 

[1] 2013 data is provisional. Final 2013 ODA will be published in Statistics on International Development 2014 in October. 

[2] Includes front line delivery costs. This is in line with OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Statistical 
Repor 
ting Directives. 
[3] Includes Regional Development Banks and other multilateral agencies on the DAC List of Multilateral Organisations. 

|                                       | £ thousands          |         |         |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|---------|---------|
| Africa                                |                      |         |         |
| Algeria                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 2,311   | 1,425   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.05                 | 0.03    | 0.02    |
| Angola                                |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 2,842                | 10,800  | 428     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.06                 | 0.21    | 0.01    |
| Benin                                 |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 19                   | -       | 45      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | 45      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | -       | 0.00    |
| Botswana                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 589     | 686     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01    | 0.02    |
| Burkina Faso                          |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 128                  | 65      | 510     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00    | 0.01    |
| Burundi                               |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 9,232                | 13,041  | 11,055  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 1,101                | 2,286   | 372     |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.20                 | 0.25    | 0.21    |
| Cameroon                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,447   | 667     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA |                      |         |         |
| 0.03                                  | 0.01                 | 0.01    | 0.02    |
| Cape Verde                            |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 461                  | 583     | 19      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01    | 0.00    |
| Central African                       |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 1,562                | 1,955   | -       |
| Republic                              |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 1,511                | 1,502   | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.04    | -       |
| Chad                                  |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 3,566                | 1,852   | 240     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 3,566                | 1,839   | 240     |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.08                 | 0.04    | 0.00    |
| Comoros                               |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -                    | 78      | 75      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00    | 0.00    |
| Congo (Rep)                           | UK Net Bilateral ODA | -       | 50,991  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | 751     | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.98    | -       |
| Congo                                 |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 144,340              | 162,380 | 238,946 |
| (Dem Rep)                             |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 61,978               | 42,482  | 31,266  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 3.05                 | 3.13    | 4.52    |
| Cote d'Ivoire                         | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 96      | 16,809  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | 7,950   |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.32    | 0.13    |
| Djibouti                              |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 1,504                | 6       | 12      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.00    | 0.00    |
| Egypt                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 22,817  | 5,821   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | 24      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.48                 | 0.11    | 0.21    |
| Eritrea                               |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 4,129                | 3,568   | 5,220   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 4,084                | 3,296   | 5,202   |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.09                 | 0.07    | 0.10    |
| Ethiopia                              |                      |         |         |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 219,537              | 263,500 | 344,491 |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 42,721               | 28,607  | 53,630  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 4.64                 | 5.08    | 6.52    |
| Gabon                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | -       | 104     |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00    | 0.00    |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       | £ thousands          |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Gambia                                |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 2,388                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.05                 |
| Ghana                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 403                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 2.08                 |
| Guinea                                |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 557                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 115                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Guinea-Bissau                         |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 83                   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Kenya                                 |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 84,007               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 15,192               |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.78                 |
| Lesotho                               |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 5,224                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.11                 |
| Liberia                               |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 21,383               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.45                 |
| Libya                                 |                      |
| [10]                                  |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 1,191                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 |
| Madagascar                            |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 832                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 832                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.02                 |
| Malawi                                |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 71,510               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 813                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.51                 |
| Mali                                  |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 19                   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Mauritania                            |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 499                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Mauritius                             | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.28                 |
| Morocco                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| -                                     |                      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.06                 |
| Mozambique                            |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 35,141               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 499                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.74                 |
| Namibia                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Niger                                 |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 3,969                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 2,074                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.08                 |
| Nigeria                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 2.56                 |
| Rwanda                                |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 57,522               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.22                 |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       | £ thousands                       |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Senegal                               |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 4,174                             |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.09                              |
| Seychelles                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                              |
| Sierra Leone                          |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 51,389                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.09                              |
| Somalia                               |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 28,009                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 13,790                            |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.59                              |
| South Africa                          |                                   |
| [4]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 43,105                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -13                               |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.91                              |
| St. Helena and                        | UK Net Bilateral ODA              |
| Dependencies                          |                                   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 2,401                             |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.45                              |
| South Sudan                           |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -                                 |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                                 |
| Sudan                                 |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 187,207                           |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 80,454                            |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 3.96                              |
| Swaziland                             |                                   |
| [4]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -2,426                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -0.05                             |
| Tanzania                              |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 138,700                           |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 3,752                             |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 2.93                              |
| Togo                                  |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 6,671                             |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.14                              |
| Tunisia                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.05                              |
| Uganda                                |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 75,127                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 12,772                            |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.59                              |
| Zambia                                |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 47,074                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 3,015                             |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.99                              |
| Zimbabwe                              |                                   |
| [1]                                   |                                   |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 70,332                            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 15,832                            |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.49                              |
| Africa Regional                       |                                   |
| Nor                                   | th of Sahara UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| Regional                              |                                   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.02                              |
| South of Sahara UK Net Bilateral ODA  | 26,748                            |
| Regional                              |                                   |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                                 |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.57                              |
| Africa Regional                       | UK Net Bilateral ODA              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 4,936                             |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 3.24                              |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       | £ thousands          |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Asia and Middle East                  |                      |
| Afghanistan                           |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 207,675              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 6,748                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 4.39                 |
| Armenia                               |                      |
| [8]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 653                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Azerbaijan                            |                      |
| [8]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 903                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.02                 |
| Bangladesh                            |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 160,101              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 2,081                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 3.38                 |
| Bhutan                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    |
| Cambodia                              |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 20,685               |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.44                 |
| China                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 1,165                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA |                      |
| 1.57                                  | 1.08                 |
| Georgia                               |                      |
| [8]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 4,641                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 218                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.10                 |
| India                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 13                   |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 8.53                 |
| Indonesia                             | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 16,338               |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.93                 |
| Iran                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Iraq                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 8,003                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.66                 |
| Jordan                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.02                 |
| Kazakhstan                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.09                 |
| 0.00                                  | 0.03                 |
| Korea Dem                             |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 32                   |
| Rep                                   |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Kyrgyz                                |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 5,723                |
| Republic                              |                      |
| [1], [7]                              |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 653                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.12                 |
| Laos                                  |                      |
| [1]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 192                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Lebanon                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.07                 |
| Malaysia                              |                      |
| [4]                                   |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 2,676                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.06                 |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |
|         |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       |                      |         |         |         |         | £ thousands    |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|----------------|
| Maldives                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 243     | 168     | 167     | 221     | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.00    | 0.00    | 0.00    | -       |                |
| Mongolia                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 455     | 537     | 111     | 2,933   | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01    | 0.00    | 0.05    | -       |                |
|                                       |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| Myanmar                               |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [1], [5]                              |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 34,020               | 28,600  | 38,803  | 30,324  | 71,134  |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 17,586               | 3,930   | 6,571   | 4,024   | 10,445  |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.72                 | 0.55    | 0.73    | 0.55    | 1.07    |                |
| Nepal                                 |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 66,081               | 68,111  | 64,917  | 69,502  | 90,399  |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 10,397               | 78      | -       | 5,047   | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.40                 | 1.31    | 1.23    | 1.26    | 1.36    |                |
| Oman                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 410     | 602     | -       | -       | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01    | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Pakistan                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 139,250 | 193,285 | 206,849 | 189,218 | 317,027        |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 21,101               | 102,668 | 73,218  | 28,859  | 30,922  |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 2.94                 | 3.72    | 3.91    | 3.43    | 4.76    |                |
| Philippines                           | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 2,810   | 376     | 1,294   | 1,664   | 32,214         |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 499                  | -       | 3       |         |         |                |
| 2                                     | 32,214               |         |         |         |         |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.06                 | 0.01    | 0.02    | 0.03    | 0.48    |                |
| Sri Lanka                             |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [4]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 11,620               | -5,504  | 2,633   | 5,460   | 1,384   |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 8,675                | 3,775   | 394     | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.25                 | -0.11   | 0.05    | 0.10    | 0.02    |                |
| Syria                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 672     | 1,263   | 1,268   | 39,547  | 127,240        |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 6                    | -       | -       | 36,565  | 126,093 |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.02    | 0.02    | 0.72    | 1.91    |                |
| Tajikistan                            |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 2,868                | 8,107   | 10,290  | 8,627   | 6,631   |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 602                  | 259     | 7       | 102     | 396     |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.06                 | 0.16    | 0.19    | 0.16    | 0.10    |                |
| Thailand                              |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [4]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 6,351                | 4,668   | -4,756  | -13,397 | -       |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.13                 | 0.09    | -0.09   | -0.24   | -       |                |
| Timor-Leste                           |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [1], [6]                              |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 70                   | -       | 46      | 131     | -       |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | -       | 0.00    | 0.00    | -       |                |
| Turkmenistan                          | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 218     | 39      | 92      | 416     | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00    | 0.00    | 0.01    | -       |                |
| Uzbekistan                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,178   | 796     | 524     | 1 636   | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       |         |                |
| -                                     |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.02                 | 0.02    | 0.01    | 0.03    | -       |                |
| Vietnam                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 60,044  | 53,225  | 21,832  | 51,664  | 19,987         |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -       | -       | -       |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.27                 | 1.03    | 0.41    | 0.94    | 0.30    |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 60,742               | 63,215  | 75,549  | 42,884  | 59,335  |                |
| West Bank and                         |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| Gaza Strip                            |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [3]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 22,010               | 7,537   | 1,736   | 1,508   | 519     |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 1.28                 | 1.22    | 1.43    | 0.78    | 0.89    |                |
| Yemen                                 |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |         |         |         |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 22,970               | 41,388  | 39,057  | 39,555  | 93,406  |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 1,684                | 7,874   | 16,446  | 18,469  | 36,457  |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.49                 | 0.80    | 0.74    | 0.72    | 1.40    |                |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## (Continued)

|                                       | £ thousands          |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Asia and Middle East Regional         |                      |
| Middle East                           | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| Regional                              |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.08                 |
| Asia Regional                         | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| (includes South                       |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Asia Regional)                        |                      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.10                 |
| Rest of the World                     |                      |
| Albania                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 |
| Anguilla                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 13                   |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Antigua and                           | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| Barbuda                               |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Argentina                             |                      |
| [11]                                  |                      |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 634                  |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Barbados                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      |                      |
| -                                     | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Belarus                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Belize                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 |
| Bolivia                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Bosnia-                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| Herzegovina                           |                      |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.13                 |
| Brazil                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 6                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.18                 |
| Chile                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Colombia                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      |                      |
| -                                     | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.10                 |
| Croatia                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 |
| Costa Rica                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 |
| Cuba                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 250                  |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 |
| Dominica                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       |                      |         |        |        |        | £ thousands    |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|---------|--------|--------|--------|----------------|
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 64                   | 39      | 96     | 145    | -      | Dominican      |
| Republic                              |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | 6       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00    | 0.00   | 0.00   | -      |                |
| Ecuador                               |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| [4]                                   |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -102                 | -19     | 138    | 340    | -      |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -0.00                | -0.00   | 0.00   | 0.01   | -      |                |
| El Salvador                           |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| [4]                                   |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 19                   | -31,611 | 6      | -82    | -      |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | -0.61   | 0.00   | -0.00  | -      |                |
| Fiji                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 371     | 343    | 130    | 667    | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 6                    | 97      | 6      | 24     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01    | 0.00   | 0.01   | -      |                |
| Grenada                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 19      | -      | 1      | 11     | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | -       | 0.00   | 0.00   | -      |                |
| Guatemala                             | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 461     | 149    | 58     | 9,478  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | 97      | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.00    | 0.00   | 0.17   | -      |                |
| Guyana                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,376   | 1,049  | 367    | 563    | 0              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      |        |        |                |
| -                                     | -                    |         |        |        |        |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.02    | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.00   |                |
| Haiti                                 |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 5,102                | 16,945  | 9,714  | 3,264  | 9,585  |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 5,083                | 15,909  | 6,723  | 2,954  | 9,585  |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.11                 | 0.33    | 0.18   | 0.06   | 0.14   |                |
| Honduras                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 64      | 16,356 | 12     | 6,875  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.32    | 0.00   | 0.12   | -      |                |
| Jamaica                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 5,307   | 2,538  | 6,446  | 8,979  | 5,690          |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.11                 | 0.05    | 0.12   | 0.16   | 0.09   |                |
| Kiribati                              |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 19                   | 39      | 16     | 17     | -      |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00    | 0.00   | 0.00   | -      |                |
| Kosovo                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 7,535   | 6,145  | 7,607  | 10,291 | 181            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.16                 | 0.12    | 0.14   | 0.19   | 0.00   |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 1,248                | 745     | 620    | 1,373  | -      | Macedonia      |
| (FYR of)                              |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | 13     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.01    | 0.01   | 0.02   | -      |                |
| Marshall Islands UK Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | -       | -      | 5      | -      |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      |        |                |
| -                                     |                      |         |        |        |        |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | -       | -      | 0.00   | -      |                |
| Mexico                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 7,452   | 6,093  | 3,590  | 3,713  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.16                 | 0.12    | 0.07   | 0.07   | -      |                |
| Moldova                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 2,061   | 9,363  | 1,516  | 1,181  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | 45      | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.04                 | 0.18    | 0.03   | 0.02   | -      |                |
| Montenegro                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 294     | 134    | 203    | 488    | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.00    | 0.00   | 0.01   | -      |                |
| Montserrat                            | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 23,860  | 10,736 | 27,744 | 21,265 | 30,629         |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 38                   | 91      | -      | 587    | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.50                 | 0.21    | 0.52   | 0.38   | 0.46   |                |
| Nauru                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | -       | 6      | -      | -      | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -       | -      | -      | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00    | -      | -      | -      |                |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |

## Table B.2: Total Uk Net Oda And Humanitarian Assistance By Recipient Country (Continued)

|                                       |                      |       |       |       |        | £ thousands    |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|-------|-------|-------|--------|----------------|
| Nicaragua                             | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 4,520 | 4,694 | 18    | 11,404 | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | 391                  | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.10                 | 0.09  | 0.00  | 0.21  | -      |                |
| Palau                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | -     | 13    | -     | -      | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00  | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Panama                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 45    | 26    | 123   | 434    | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | 10    | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.01  | -      |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 627                  | 667   | -200  | 1,328 | -      |                |
| Papua New                             |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| Guinea                                |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| [4]                                   |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.01  | -0.00 | 0.02  | -      |                |
| Paraguay                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 26    | 6     | 29    | 76     | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| Peru                                  | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 685   | 822   | 372   | 2,717  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.02  | 0.01  | 0.05  | -      |                |
| Samoa                                 |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 115                  | 149   | 254   | -     | 166    |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | -     | 0.00   |                |
| Serbia                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 4,942 | 3,497 | 1,517 | 3,280  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.10                 | 0.07  | 0.03  | 0.06  | -      |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 147                  | 142   | 116   | 227   | 150    |                |
| Solomon                               |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| Islands                               |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | 150    |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00   |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 1                    | -     | 0     | 2,354 | -      | St Kitts and   |
| Nevis                                 |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | -     | 0.00  | 0.04  | -      |                |
| St Lucia                              | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 6     | 13    | 230   | 161    | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | 209   | -     |        |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -                    | 13    | 27    | 48    | -      | St Vincent and |
| the Grenadines                        |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| Tonga                                 | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 6     | 97    | 21    | 19     | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 282                  | 155   | -     | -     | -      | Trinidad and   |
| Tobago                                |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.01                 | 0.00  | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Turkey                                | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,428 | 2,428 | 3,438 | 8,617  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | 215   | 224   | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.05  | 0.07  | 0.16  | -      |                |
| Tuvalu                                |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | -                    | 26    | 31    | 20    | -      |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| Ukraine                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,517 | 544   | 829   | 3,041  | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.03                 | 0.01  | 0.02  | 0.06  | -      |                |
| Uruguay                               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 26    | 45    | 59    | 123    | -              |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | 7     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | -      |                |
| Vanuatu                               |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| [1]                                   |                      |       |       |       |        |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                  | 64                   | 58    | 67    | 20    | 44     |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance      | -                    | -     | -     | -     | -      |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA | 0.00                 | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00  | 0.00   |                |
| 2009    |
|---------|
| [2]     |
|         |

## (Continued)

|                                                  |                      |                      |           | £ thousands    |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-----------|----------------|
| 2009                                             | 2010                 | 2011                 | 2012      | 2013           |
| [2]                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| Venezuela                                        | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,383                | 706       | 487            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance                 | -                    | -                    | 14        | 9              |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 0.03                 | 0.01                 | 0.01      | 0.02           |
| Rest of the World Regional                       |                      |                      |           |                |
| Nor                                              | th and               | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 851       | 304            |
| Central America of which Humanitarian Assistance |                      |                      |           |                |
| -                                                | -                    | -                    | -         | -              |
| Regional                                         |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 0.02                 | 0.01                 | 0.07      | 0.03           |
| West Indies                                      |                      |                      |           |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                             | 12,145               | 16,136               | 13,363    | 11,190         |
| Regional                                         |                      |                      |           |                |
| [9]                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance                 | -1,761               | 803                  | 100       | 66             |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 0.26                 | 0.31                 | 0.25      | 0.20           |
| Americas                                         | UK Net Bilateral ODA | -                    | 6,333     | 89             |
| Regional                                         |                      |                      |           |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance                 | -                    | -                    | -         | -              |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | -                    | 0.12                 | 0.00      | 0.00           |
| Europe Regional UK Net Bilateral ODA             | 2,561                | 6,106                | 131       | 139            |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance                 | -                    | -                    | -         | -              |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 0.05                 | 0.12                 | 0.00      | 0.00           |
| Oceania                                          | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 2,362                | 2,959     | 2,045          |
| Regional                                         |                      |                      |           |                |
| of which Humanitarian Assistance                 | 102                  | -                    | -         | -              |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 0.05                 | 0.06                 | 0.04      | 0.06           |
| Total Africa                                     | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,789,442            | 1,991,348 | 2,126,292      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 37.82                | 38.36                | 40.23     | 39.35          |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.12                 | 0.13                 | 0.14      | 0.14           |
| Total Asia                                       | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 1,383,930            | 1,334,164 | 1,339,085      |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 29.25                | 25.70                | 25.33     | 24.85          |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.10                 | 0.09                 | 0.09      | 0.09           |
|                                                  |                      |                      |           |                |
| Total Rest of                                    | UK Net Bilateral ODA | 115,419              | 122,759   | 123,922        |
| the World                                        |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 2.44                 | 2.36                 | 2.34      | 3.64           |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.01                 | 0.01                 | 0.01      | 0.01           |
| Unspecified                                      |                      |                      |           |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                             | 1,443,286            | 1,742,604            | 1,696,489 | 1,776,137      |
| Region                                           |                      |                      |           |                |
| [3]                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 30.50                | 33.57                | 32.10     | 32.16          |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.10                 | 0.12                 | 0.11      | 0.11           |
| TOTAL UK NET UK Net Bilateral ODA                | 4,732,077            | 5,190,875            | 5,285,789 | 5,523,660      |
| BILATERAL                                        |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 100                  | 100                  | 100       | 100            |
|                                                  |                      |                      |           |                |
|                                                  |                      |                      |           |                |
| ODA                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.33                 | 0.35                 | 0.34      | 0.36           |
| LOW INCOME                                       |                      |                      |           |                |
| UK Net Bilateral ODA                             | 1,804,540            | 1,832,111            | 2,240,917 | 2,172,324      |
| COUNTRIES                                        |                      |                      |           |                |
| [2]                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Total Net Bilateral ODA            | 38.13                | 35.30                | 42.40     | 39.33          |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.13                 | 0.12                 | 0.15      | 0.14           |
| TOTAL UK NET UK Net Multilateral ODA             | 2,491,069            | 3,260,959            | 3,342,828 | 3,241,840      |
|                                                  |                      |                      |           |                |
| MULTILATERAL                                     |                      |                      |           |                |
| ODA                                              |                      |                      |           |                |
| Percentage of Gross National Income              | 0.18                 | 0.22                 | 0.22      | 0.21           |

## Key - Nil

[1]  Income groups are classified using 2012 GNI per capita thresholds. Low income countries are based on those with 
a GNI per capita in 2012 of US$1,035 or less. Figures for previous years have been revised on this basis. 
[2]  Data for 2013 is provisional and final figures will be published later in the year in Statistics on International 
Development (SID) 2014. 
[3]  These figures include spend from other government departments which have not yet been broken down by country. 
Final data will have less 'Unspecified Region' ODA, therefore comparisons with previous year's statistics should be made with caution. 
[4]  ODA can be negative as it is repor 
ted net of any inflows. Percentages were not previously shown when net ODA 
was negative. In this table, they have been shown to ensure that percentages total 100%. 
[5]  In previous Annual Reports this was labelled as Burma. This has been changed to align with DAC repor 
ting. 
[6]  In previous Annual Reports this was labelled as East Timor. This has been changed to align with DAC repor 
ting. 
[7]  In previous Annual Reports this was labelled as Kyrgyzstan. This has been changed to align with DAC reporting. [8]  In previous Annual Reports these countries were reported under Rest of the World. They are now being repor 
ted 
under Asia to align with DAC repor 
ting. 
[9]  In previous Annual Reports this was repor 
ted under Caribbean Regional. This has been changed to align with DAC 
repor 
ting. 
[10] In previous Annual Reports this was labelled as Libyan Arab Republic. This has been changed to align with DAC 
repor 
ting. 
[11] In previous Annual Reports this was labelled as Argentine Republic. This has been changed to align with DAC 
repor 
ting. 

£ thousands 
Sector description 
2009 
2010 
2011 
2012 
2013[2] 
Social Infrastructure and Services 
Education
 523,321
 486,350
 652,627
 632,140
 797,431 
Health
 393,393
 452,243
 555,495
 654,090
 906,735 
Population policies/programmes and reproductive 
 303,602
 333,604
 387,671
 424,524
 373,010 
health Water supply and sanitation
 73,183
 101,616
 106,329
 107,735
 136,358 
Government and civil society
 761,568
 734,528
 813,835
 793,721
 670,395 
Other social infrastructure and services
 204,053
 260,949
 236,178
 210,226
 310,163 
Economic Infrastructure and Services 
Transport and storage
 90,284
 115,836
 93,200
 170,427
 146,154 
Communications
 47,629
 72,899
 59,768
 21,584
 2,377 
Energy
 51,782
 86,461
 160,088
 291,420
 74,092 
Banking and financial services 
450,989 
127,669
 150,657
 155,691
 97,373 
Business and other services 
18,010 
35,806
 31,305
 30,854
 51,463 
Production sectors 
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 
91,748 
98,991
 142,044
 182,734
 141,138 
Industry, mining and construction 
22,428 
101,766
 99,538
 51,459
 35,803 
Trade policies and regulations 
47,321 
135,108
 48,055
 60,298
 55,611 
Tourism
 807 
10,497
 3,002
 1,745
 962 
Multi-sector/cross cutting 
General environmental protection 
360,117 
577,807
 123,565
 286,360
 270,256 
Other multi-sector 
102,422 
247,077
 229,610
 210,288
 301,384 
Non-sector allocable 
General budget suppor 
t 
346,086 
420,637
 278,966
 220,033
 135,080 
Developmental food aid/food security assistance 
9,224 
107,001
 94,908
 65,555
 94,017 
Action relating to debt 
27,266 
106,062
 113,914
 70,958
 7,426 
Humanitarian assistance 
484,464 
369,243
 439,505
 426,250
 824,135 
Administrative costs of donors 
254,186 
237,811
 286,146
 333,254
 245,272 
Suppor 
t to non-governmental organisations 
207,000 
108,812
 263,044
 246,738
 205,176 
Refugees in donor countries 
7,355 
11,700
 19,527
 28,370 
- 
Non-sector allocable 3 
58,665 
75,278
 109,624
 47,742 
1,080,731 
Total UK gross bilateral ODA 
4,936,903 
5,415,753 
5,498,600 
5,724,194 
6,962,544 

## Key - Nil

[1] DFID projects can be allocated up to eight input sector codes. In this table, only the largest contributing input sector 
code per project is included. This is in line with OECD DAC Statistical Repor 
ting Directives. 
[2] 2013 figures are provisional. Final ODA will be published in Statistics on International Development 2014 in October. [3] These figures include some spend from other government depar 
tments which has not yet been broken down by 
sector. Final data will have less 'Non-sector allocable' ODA therefore comparisons with previous year's statistics should be made with caution. 

| Country              | 2008    | 2009    | 2010    | 2011    | 2012    |
|----------------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| Afghanistan          | 26,754  | 42,331  | 55,968  | 68,387  | 40,186  |
| Albania              | 11,447  | 8,416   | 12,912  | -       | -       |
| Algeria              | 1,658   | 5,994   | 10,173  | -       | -       |
| Angola               | 13,407  | 2,266   | 10,845  | 16,662  | 8,518   |
| Anguilla             | -       |         | -       |         | -       |
| Antigua and Barbuda  | -       | 476     | 1,313   | -       | 45      |
| Argentina            | 1,216   | 1,698   | 3,662   | 2,025   | 6,473   |
| Armenia              | 4,281   | 13,284  | 4,898   | 9,794   | 11,582  |
| Azerbaijan           | 8,814   | 4,975   | 7,269   | -       | -       |
| Bangladesh           | 91,874  | 23,928  | 79,981  | 259,868 | 64,419  |
| Barbados             | 897     | 256     | 2,196   | -       | -       |
| Belarus              | 1,481   | 1,904   | 3,768   | 3,407   | 3,216   |
| Belize               | 932     | 2,831   | 3,514   | -       | -       |
| Benin                | 16,644  | 13,450  | 25,873  | 23,902  | 17,656  |
| Bhutan               | 668     | 1,020   | 4,437   | 1,719   | 4,183   |
| Bolivia              | 4,198   | 7,059   | 7,950   | 27,229  | 9,250   |
| Bosnia-Herzegovina   | 9,020   | 11,900  | 23,015  | -       | -       |
| Botswana             | 927     | 7,520   | 1,865   | 1,732   | 1,647   |
| Brazil               | 2,786   | 3,944   | 3,492   | 4,606   | 17,595  |
| Burkina Faso         | 49,385  | 18,167  | 36,099  | 54,404  | 31,563  |
| Burundi              | 13,564  | 13,926  | 16,800  | 25,075  | 20,848  |
| Cambodia             |         |         |         |         |         |
| 9,654                | 4,182   | 21,200  | 9,372   | 5,976   |         |
| Cameroon             | 17,156  | 19,607  | 25,182  | 20,782  | 21,925  |
| Cape Verde           | 7,796   | 2,191   | 3,966   | 2,502   | 3,701   |
| Central African Rep. | 6,104   | 12,153  | 10,125  | 10,712  | 15,458  |
| Chad                 | 7,413   | 11,589  | 22,484  | 28,472  | 17,208  |
| Chile                | 765     | 220     | 1,473   | 276     | 784     |
| China                | 13,470  | 21,768  | 24,503  | -       | -       |
| Colombia             | 4,413   | 3,354   | 11,575  | -       | -       |
| Comoros              | 780     | 3,544   | 2,472   | 763     | 2,870   |
| Congo, Dem. Rep.     | 41,012  | 63,825  | 88,195  | 107,769 | 69,989  |
| Congo, Rep.          | 8,190   | 3,246   | 6,429   | 6,854   | 6,094   |
| Cook Islands         | 38      | 105     | 53      | 86      | 11      |
| Costa Rica           | 939     | 886     | 1,613   | 3,489   | 628     |
| Cote d'Ivoire        | 30,196  | 21,939  | 21,432  | -       | -       |
| Croatia              | 14,893  | 15,754  | 21,283  | -       | -       |
| Cuba                 | 500     | 4,334   | 2,030   | 1,814   | 1,461   |
| Djibouti             | 2,558   | 713     | 2,331   | 2,746   | 5,809   |
| Dominica             | 466     | 6       | 778     | 6       | 1,707   |
| Dominican Republic   | 1,628   | 4,549   | 14,744  | -       | -       |
| Ecuador              | 5,377   | 4,191   | 2,148   | -       | -       |
| Egypt                | 16,005  | 17,327  | 29,033  | 17,247  | 48,161  |
| El Salvador          | 665     | 5,938   | 4,866   | 7,422   | 335     |
| Equatorial Guinea    | 296     | 491     |         |         |         |
| 134                  | 159     | 277     |         |         |         |
| Eritrea              | 3,035   | 9,005   | 5,380   | 5,993   | 2,948   |
| Ethiopia             | 65,418  | 70,522  | 105,665 | 74,259  | 188,474 |
| Fiji                 | 2,301   | 564     | 1,992   | -       | -       |
| Gabon                | 509     | 1,286   | 2,585   | 1,778   | 746     |
| Gambia               | 980     | 2,070   | 7,945   | 7,134   | 10,945  |
| Georgia              | 21,583  | 20,044  | 18,583  | 15,130  | 34,896  |
| Ghana                | 57,678  | 35,418  | 52,059  | -       | -       |
| Grenada              | 437     | 797     | 745     | 1,843   | 1,406   |
| Guatemala            | 2,360   | 5,008   | 4,888   | 7,037   | 2,246   |
£ thousands 
 
 
| Country                    | 2008    | 2009    | 2010    | 2011    | 2012    |
|----------------------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| Guinea                     | 1,901   | 1,645   | 2,684   | 26,179  | 8,821   |
| Guinea-Bissau              | 3,886   | 4,054   | 4,761   | 2,651   | 968     |
| Guyana                     | 2,584   | 2,810   | 4,865   | 6,949   | 2,212   |
| Haiti                      | 9,233   | 35,598  | 43,543  | 35,356  | 17,497  |
| Honduras                   | 12,904  | 2,917   | 11,633  | 19,345  | 10,486  |
| India                      | 78,593  | 33,085  | 273,161 | 222,879 | 122,792 |
| Indonesia                  | 26,011  | 23,989  | 17,359  | 11,026  | 10,585  |
| Iran                       | 2,179   | 1,110   | 2,057   | -       | -       |
| Iraq                       | 14,887  | 7,276   | 6,202   | 4,196   | 5,808   |
| Jamaica                    | 8,872   | 2,614   | 7,314   | 7,512   | 1,332   |
| Jordan                     | 9,140   | 7,929   | 10,911  | -       | -       |
| Kazakhstan                 | 1,736   | 1,677   | 5,190   | 2,396   | 2,607   |
| Kenya                      | 5,229   | 46,288  | 67,636  | 84,680  | 150,253 |
| Kiribati                   | 76      | 582     | 708     | 3,700   | 596     |
| Korea, Dem. Rep.           | 993     | 1,211   | 4,832   | 1,832   | 2,097   |
| Kosovo                     | -       | 25,302  | 24,135  | 31,342  | 15,371  |
| Kyrgyz Republic            | 6,095   | 4,871   | 11,716  | 13,936  | 8,108   |
| Laos                       | 6,091   | 2,662   | 11,248  | 8,189   | 8,747   |
| Lebanon                    | 9,750   | 5,440   | 7,859   | 7,996   | 16,686  |
| Lesotho                    | 3,832   | 4,236   | 14,246  | 12,515  | 1,282   |
| Liberia                    | 8,350   | 16,528  | 17,005  | 22,434  | 23,903  |
| Libya                      |         |         |         |         |         |
| 734                        | 70      | 1,833   | 4,168   | 3,361   |         |
| Macedonia, FYR             | 6,411   | 8,897   | 13,538  | -       | -       |
| Madagascar                 | 54,261  | 2,439   | 11,328  | 7,608   | 31,593  |
| Malawi                     | 15,288  | 27,200  | 40,549  | 32,585  | 63,731  |
| Malaysia                   | 1,058   | 363     | 1,556   | 472     | 1,517   |
| Maldives                   | 1,366   | 726     | 1,478   | -       | -       |
| Mali                       | 41,086  | 25,794  | 14,640  | 33,093  | 7,251   |
| Marshall Islands           | 42      | 496     | 128     | 4       | 4       |
| Mauritania                 | 2,395   | 595     | 4,721   | 10,834  | 5,431   |
| Mauritius                  | 5,239   | 12,090  | 2,128   | 8,550   | 5,496   |
| Mexico                     | 2,239   | 1,837   | 5,967   | 950     | 4,932   |
| Micronesia, Federal States | 62      | 821     | -       | 10      | 16      |
| Moldova                    | 9,849   | 9,335   | 38,444  | 17,881  | 25,840  |
| Mongolia                   | 1,603   | 2,222   | 6,488   | 5,779   | 2,458   |
| Montenegro                 | 2,832   | 3,596   | 4,817   | 4,113   | 4,421   |
| Montserrat                 | -       | 2       | 6       | -       | 1,096   |
| Morocco                    | 24,801  | 17,064  | 23,527  | 21,631  | 70,494  |
| Mozambique                 | 53,544  | 12,757  | 41,569  | 49,446  | 34,565  |
| Myanmar                    | 5,931   | 4,998   | 13,113  | 6,952   | 21,377  |
| Namibia                    | 3,107   | 563     | 14,384  | -       | -       |
| Nauru                      | 17      | 278     | -       | 67      | 6       |
| Nepal                      | 11,737  | 14,091  | 27,723  | 36,613  | 30,973  |
| Nicaragua                  | 7,568   | 5,185   |         |         |         |
| 8,077                      | 9,200   | 7,472   |         |         |         |
| Niger                      | 31,424  | 5,599   | 16,213  | 40,241  | 35,862  |
| Nigeria                    | 57,596  | 81,790  | 52,330  | -       | -       |
| Niue                       | -       | 372     | 3       | -       | -       |
| Oman                       | 35      | 23      | 20      | -       | -       |
| Pakistan                   | 21,854  | 94,459  | 69,800  | -       | -       |
| Palau                      | 21      | 274     | -       | 1       | 4       |
| Panama                     | 288     | 1,473   | 241     | 625     | 318     |
£ thousands 
| Country                       | 2008    | 2009    | 2010    | 2011    | 2012    |
|-------------------------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| Papua New Guinea              | 2,710   | 3,096   | 9,731   | -       | -       |
| Paraguay                      | 5,936   | 602     | 1,823   | 4,356   | 882     |
| Peru                          | 1,236   | 9,103   | 2,694   | -       | -       |
| Philippines                   | 5,140   | 8,728   | 13,079  | 4,588   | 9,967   |
| Rwanda                        | 27,004  | 21,655  | 46,524  | 40,600  | 30,769  |
| Samoa                         | 608     | 1,911   | 3,806   | 2,054   | 1,975   |
| Sao Tome and Principe         | 729     | 1,923   | 342     | 3,408   | 972     |
| Senegal                       | 24,289  | 18,644  | 19,179  | 27,237  | 23,541  |
| Serbia                        | 43,646  | 46,061  | 28,945  | 24,493  | 59,458  |
| Seychelles                    | 28      | 2,144   | 231     | 85      | 953     |
| Sierra Leone                  | 10,092  | 5,114   | 21,642  | 18,612  | 13,931  |
| Solomon Islands               | 269     | 1,217   | 3,793   | 561     | 1,240   |
| Somalia                       | 12,953  | 9,603   | 8,746   | 27,195  | 16,217  |
| South Africa                  | 14,685  | 14,811  | 29,147  | 26,247  | 17,241  |
| Sri Lanka                     | 18,694  | 13,094  | 17,795  | 31,398  | 3,696   |
| St Helena                     | -       | -       | -       | 2,087   | -       |
| St Kitts and Nevis            | 788     | 1,318   | 2,811   | -       | 1,122   |
| St Lucia                      | 816     | 124     | 513     | 2,782   | 2,595   |
| St Vincent and the Grenadines | 368     | 202     | 990     | 1,466   | 1,252   |
| Sudan                         | 24,898  | 14,520  | 27,805  | 46,427  | 14,423  |
| Suriname                      | 349     | 2,013   | 389     | 950     | 685     |
| Swaziland                     |         |         |         |         |         |
| 3,776                         | 3,269   | 5,015   | 12,543  | 1,775   |         |
| Syria                         | 3,165   | 5,840   | 9,810   | 1,803   | 18,533  |
| Tajikistan                    | 3221    | 4,587   | 11,247  | 4,625   | 10,096  |
| Tanzania                      | 55,505  | 86,433  | 87,596  | 78,524  | 78,629  |
| Thailand                      | 2,402   | 4,159   | 3,741   | -       | -       |
| Timor-Leste                   | 1,820   | 1,299   | 7,537   | 5,836   | 3,903   |
| Togo                          | 11,912  | 7,485   | 15,136  | 17,607  | 10,602  |
| Tokelau                       | -       | 13      |         | 9       | 2       |
| Tonga                         | 266     | 198     | 1,462   | 4,595   | 900     |
| Trinidad and Tobago           | 1,032   | 1,222   | 4,826   | -       | -       |
| Tunisia                       | 11,579  | 9,460   | 13,083  | -       | -       |
| Turkey                        | 165,710 | 58,526  | 95,661  | 99,419  | 211,152 |
| Turkmenistan                  | 799     | 127     | 2,718   | 874     | 441     |
| Tuvalu                        | 50      | 507     | 219     | 1,841   | 180     |
| Uganda                        | 47,558  | 42,388  | 35,868  | 38,633  | 44,048  |
| Ukraine                       | 14,968  | 19,372  | 22,349  | 29,584  | 40,605  |
| Uruguay                       | 407     | 187     | 233     | 1,141   | 1,315   |
| Uzbekistan                    | 5,042   | 7,993   | 9,252   | -       | -       |
| Vanuatu                       | 110     | 990     | 60      | 256     | 280     |
| Venezuela                     | 1,338   | 1,649   | 467     | 234     | 320     |
| Vietnam                       | 69,623  | 55,770  | 87,161  | -       | -       |
| West Bank and Gaza            | 54,113  | 67,369  | 77,309  | 78,895  | 50,691  |
| Yemen                         | 9,792   | 12,015  |         |         |         |
| 21,851                        | 11,966  | 14,128  |         |         |         |
| Yugoslavia, Sts Ex-Yugo.      | 25      | -       | 233     | -       | -       |
| Zambia                        | 46,032  | 10,563  | 18,779  | 38,019  | 25,249  |
| Zimbabwe                      | 2,812   | 7,519   | 10,185  | 7,141   | 23,705  |
£ thousands 

## (Continued)

|                                              | Region                           | 2008      | 2009      | 2010      | 2011      | 2012    |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---------|
| Nor                                          | th Africa, Regional              | 4,924     | 24,134    | 21,469    | 15,831    | 4,660   |
| South of Sahara, Regional                    | 42,224                           | 63,789    | 42,212    | 44,474    | 53,471    |         |
| Africa, Regional                             | 1,201                            | 133,601   | 38,581    | 54,276    | 95,847    |         |
| Nor                                          | th and Central America, Regional | 1,945     | 6,243     | 1,499     | 1,957     | 7,967   |
| West Indies, Regional                        | 52                               | 142       | 4,210     | 11,547    | 5,769     |         |
| South America, Regional                      | 7,134                            | 3,482     | 11,405    | 6,815     | 2,296     |         |
| America, Regional                            | 6,551                            | 17,334    | 30,535    | 21,932    | 10,509    |         |
| Middle East, Regional                        | 1,040                            | 2,037     | 7,234     | 4,534     | 2,825     |         |
| Central Asia, Regional                       | 2,822                            | 3,609     | 3,866     | 3,049     | 4,619     |         |
| South and Central Asia, Regional             | -                                | 1,018     | 2,702     | 3,803     | 1,951     |         |
| South Asia, Regional                         | 190                              | 450       | 12        | 40        | 706       |         |
| Far East, Regional                           | -                                | -         | 2,787     | 9,923     | 1,061     |         |
| Asia, Regional                               | 7,608                            | 33,410    | 26,266    | 51,341    | 42,986    |         |
| Europe, Regional                             | 29,233                           | 43,002    | 56,887    | 61,583    | 36,296    |         |
| Oceania, Regional                            | 504                              | 3,270     | 7,391     | 305       | 3,883     |         |
| Unspecified country/region                   |                                  |           |           |           |           |         |
| Unspecified                                  | 315,291                          | 476,824   | 521,020   | 704,946   | 779,094   |         |
| Total net multilateral ODA                   | 2,308,312                        | 2,516,372 | 3,357,468 | 3,342,828 | 3,241,840 |         |
| Low Income Countries                         |                                  |           |           |           |           |         |
| Total imputed multilateral ODA to Low Income | 890,552                          | 752,703   | 1,184,484 | 1,492,894 | 1,274,270 |         |
| Countries                                    |                                  |           |           |           |           |         |
| % of country specific total                  | 47.2%                            | 44.2%     | 45.9%     | 63.6%     | 58.2%     |         |
| Key                                          |                                  |           |           |           |           |         |
| - Nil                                        |                                  |           |           |           |           |         |

[1] UK funding to multilateral organisations cannot be directly attributed to any country; the estimates above are 
imputed shares based on each multilateral's distribution of ODA and the UK's total core funding for each organisation. 
[2] ODA is defined as flows administered with the promotion of economic development and welfare of developing 
countries as their main objective, which are concessional in character and convey a grant element of at least 25%. Aid to countries on the DAC list of ODA recipients is eligible to be recorded as ODA. 
[3] Only some multilaterals provide the DAC with detailed information about their distribution of funds and the list of 
multilateral organisations that provide detailed information to the DAC may change from year to year. Assumptions have been made for other multilaterals recognised by the DAC and funding has been allocated to regions or 'unspecified country' if necessary. 
[4] Countries are defined as low income based on their Gross National Income (GNI) per head. In the table above 
countries are defined as low income if they have a GNI per capita of less than US$1,035 in 2012. Figures for previous years have been revised on this basis. 

## 

£ thousands