BIRCHOVER QUARRY Addendum to Pavement Visual Condition Survey (Designated HGV Route)

47075218

July 2017

Prepared for: Birchover Stone Limited

Prepared by: AECOM

## REVISION SCHEDULE

| Rev | Date | Details | Prepared by | Reviewed by | Approved by | |-----|---------|---------------|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------| | 1 | 03-08-17| First Issue | Jordan Wardle | Darren Ball | Gary Hurrell | | | | | Trainee Technician | Principal Engineer | Technical Director |

Document Reference: BSLQ-AEC-HG-XX-RP-CE-00004 Limitations

AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Birchover Stone Limited (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed, letter ref GH/JM/314738/ZBID dated 18 May 2015. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.

The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report.

The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken in July 2017 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances.

Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available.

AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report.

Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. AECOM specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report.

Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant changes.

Where field investigations are carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to meet the stated objectives of the services. The results of any measurements taken may vary spatially or with time and further confirmatory measurements should be made after any significant delay in issuing this Report.

Copyright

© This Report is the copyright of AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 1
2. VISUAL CONDITION SURVEY ........................................... 1 2.1 General ........................................................................... 1 2.2 Birchover Road ............................................................. 2 2.3 Barton Hill ..................................................................... 7 2.4 Main Street .................................................................... 12 2.5 The Mires ..................................................................... 16
3. SUMMARY ........................................................................ 26

APPENDIX A – DRAWINGS

Plan 3 - Section 106 Agreement

1. INTRODUCTION

AECOM has been commissioned by Birchover Stone Limited to undertake an annual visual assessment of the condition of the road between Birchover Quarry and the B5056. The annual survey is required to satisfy condition 42 of the planning permission (ref NP/DDD/0312/0257) and obligation 8 of the Section 106 agreement. Planning condition 42 states:

‘The site operator shall, throughout the period of use of the site accesses in connection with the approved development, submit to the Mineral Planning Authority no later than 7 May each year the results of annual surveys with the Local Highway Authority of the condition of the highway along the designated HGV route as defined in condition 41 to this permission and identification of any damage thereto attributable to the approved development.’

This report is the second addendum to the initial condition survey carried out and reported in July 2015, BSLO-AEC-HG-XX-RP-CE-00002 ‘Pavement Visual Condition Survey’ and should be read in conjunction with that report and subsequent addendum report.

The annual visual condition survey was undertaken on Wednesday 12 July 2017 by Peter Stevenson of Derbyshire County Council along with Darren Ball and Jordan Wardle of AECOM in accordance with the requirements of the obligation.

2. VISUAL CONDITION SURVEY

2.1 General

The original pavement condition report described above will provide general details of the existing carriageway, initial condition and survey methodology.

This second annual follow up visual condition survey did not identify any significant additional defects from those identified during the initial survey.

The survey photographs below highlight the current status of the previously identified defects and, where appropriate, provides commentary on any meaningful change. The initial report sequentially numbered the photographs of identified defects. To enable the cross comparison of defects for future annual surveys the following photograph numbering system has been adopted.

Photograph x.x.x where –

x.0.0 represents the sequential annual visit. 0.x.0 represents the sequential defect identification number. 0.0.x represents the sequential photograph number associated with the defect.

Example:

Photograph 2 identifying an existing defect within the initial report is now referenced as ‘Defect 1.01.1 under the revised numbering system and represents the first annual inspection, the first identified defect and the first photograph associated with the defect.' 2.2 Birchover Road

Defect 01 (main report photograph reference 2) Slight deterioration of the access slab off the highway compared to the previous site visit but no significant change to the highway.

Photograph 2.01.1 : Location – Access to the existing Birchover Quarry Entrance, approximate Chainage 16, Direction – South

Defect 02 (main report photograph reference 3) No significant change

Photograph 2.02.1 : Location – Chainage 40, Direction - South Defect 03 (main report photograph reference 4) No significant change

Photograph 2.03.1 : Location – Chainage 60, Direction - South

Defect 04 (main report photograph reference 5) No significant change

Photograph 2.04.1 : Location – Chainage 90, Direction - South Defect 05 (main report photograph reference 6) A slight deterioration to the surface (surface dressing) caused by the turning of large vehicles into and out of the site. This is not considered to be a significant change.

Photograph 2.05.1: Location - Chainage 180 (Birchover works entrance), Direction – South

Photograph 2.05.2: Location - Chainage 180 (Birchover works entrance), Direction – South Defect 06 (main report photograph reference 7) No significant change. No photograph.

Defect 07 (main report photograph reference 8) A slight deterioration of the surface (surface dressing) although this is not a significant change from the initial survey.

Photograph 2.07.1 : Location - Chainage 265, Direction – South

Photograph 2.07.2 : Location - Chainage 270, Direction – South Defect 08 (main report photograph reference 9 to 11) No significant change.

Photograph 2.08.1 : Location – Approximate Chainage 352 at the junction between Birchover Road / Barton Hill / Lees Road, Direction – East

Photograph 2.08.2 : Location – Approximate Chainage 360 at the junction between Birchover Road / Barton Hill / Lees Road, Direction – Southeast 2.3 Barton Hill

Defect 09 (main report photograph reference 10) No significant change.

Photograph 2.09.1 : Location – Chainage 380, Direction – South

Defect 10 (main report photograph 11 to 16) Defect of delaminated surface dressing from Chainage 390 to 460. No significant change.

Photograph 2.10.1 : Location – Chainage 390, Direction – South Photograph 2.10.2 : Location – Chainage 400, Direction – Southwest

Photograph 2.10.3 : Location – Chainage 430, Direction – Southwest Defect 11 (main report photograph reference 17) No significant change.

Photograph 2.11.1 : Location – Chainage 525, Direction – Southwest

Defect 12 No significant change.

Photograph 2.12.1 : Location – Chainage 530, Direction – Southwest Defect 13 (main report photograph reference 18 & 19) No significant change.

Photograph 2.13.1 : Location – Chainage 550, Direction – West

Photograph 2.13.2 : Location – Chainage 560, Direction – West Defect 14 (main report photograph reference 20) No significant change.

Photograph 2.14.1 : Location – Chainage 589, Direction – East

Defect 15 (main report photograph reference 21) No significant change.

Photograph 2.15.1 : Location – Chainage 705, Direction – West 2.4 Main Street

Defect 16 (main report photograph reference 22) No significant change. Defect 17 (main report photograph reference 23) No significant change, No Photograph.

Defect 18 (main report photograph reference 24) No significant change. New patching works were evident on the westbound carriageway between Chainage 820 and 850 within the extents of carriageway deformation previously identified (Photographs 2.18.2 & 2.18.2).

Photograph 2.18.1 : Location – approx. Ch790, Direction – West

Photograph 2.18.2 : Location – Chainage 820 - 850, Direction – West Defect 19 (main report photograph reference 25) No significant change. Defect 20 (main report photograph reference 26) No significant change.

Photograph 2.20.1 : Location – Chainage 970, Direction – West

Defect 21 (main report photograph reference 27) No significant change.

Photograph 2.21.1 : Location – Chainage 980, Direction – West 2.5 The Mires

Defect 22 (main report photograph reference 28) Carriageway patching was evident in the location of the previously identified longitudinal cracking. It should be noted this patching does not encompass the full extent of the crack identified.

Photograph 2.22.1 : Location – Chainage 1040 - 1060, Direction – North

Defect 23 (main report photograph reference 29) No significant change.

Photograph 2.23.1 : Location – Chainage 1050, Direction – South Defect 24 (main report photograph reference 30) No significant change.

Photograph 2.24.1 : Location – Ch.1105, Direction – North

Defect 25 (main report photograph reference 31) No significant change.

Photograph 2.25.1 : Location – Chainage 1150, Direction – North Defect 26 (main report photograph reference 32) No significant change.

Photograph 2.26.1 : Location – Chainage 1150, Direction – North

Photograph 2.26.2 : Location – Chainage 1160, Direction – North Defect 27 (main report photograph reference 33) No significant change, No Photograph.

Defect 28 (main report photograph reference 34 & 35) No significant change.

Photograph 2.28.1 : Location – Chainage 1308, Direction – West

Photograph 2.28.2 : Location – Chainage 1308, Direction – West Defect 29 (main report photograph reference 36) No significant change.

Photograph 2.29.1 : Location – Chainage 1381, Direction – Southwest

Defect 30 (main report photograph reference 37) No significant change.

Photograph 2.30.1 : Location – Chainage 1580, Direction – West Defect 31 (main report photograph reference 38) No significant change.

Photograph 2.31.1 : Location – Chainage 1635, Direction – West

Photograph 2.31.2 : Location – Chainage 1635, Direction – West Defect 32 (main report photograph reference 39) No significant change.

Photograph 2.32.1 : Location – Chainage 1640, Direction – South

Defect 33 (main report photograph reference 40) No significant change.

Photograph 2.33.1 : Location – Chainage 1680, Direction – West Defect 34 (main report photograph reference 41) No significant change, No Photograph.

Defect 35 (main report photograph reference 42) No significant change.

Photograph 2.35.1 : Location – Chainage 1755, Direction – West

Defect 36 (main report photograph reference 43) No significant change. No Photograph

Photograph 2.36.1 : Location – Chainage 1800, Direction – East Defect 37 (main report photograph reference 44 & 45) No significant change.

Photograph 2.37.1 : Location – Chainage 1840, Direction – West

Photograph 2.37.2 : Location – Chainage 1860, Direction – West Defect 38 (main report photograph reference 46 to 48) No significant change. 3. SUMMARY

The annual 2017 visual condition survey did not identify any significant change to existing defects identified during the initial and subsequent survey. There were also no additional defects identified during this survey.

It should be noted that there were signs of continued deterioration of the surface dressing along the route but it was agreed with Peter (DCC Inspector) that this is likely to be natural wear and tear leading to suggest the trafficking of quarry traffic along the route has not caused any consequential damage to the carriageway. APPENDIX A – DRAWING ABOUT AECOM In a complex and unpredictable world, where growing demands have to be met with finite resources, AECOM brings experience gained from improving quality of life in hundreds of places. We bring together economists, planners, engineers, designers and project managers to work on projects at every scale. We engineer energy efficient buildings and we build new links between cities. We design new communities and regenerate existing ones. We are the first whole environments business, going beyond buildings and infrastructure. Our Europe teams form an important part of our worldwide network of nearly 100,000 staff in 150 countries. Through 360 ingenuity, we develop pioneering solutions that help our clients to see further and go further. www.aecom.com Follow us on Twitter: @aecom