| Indicator | Description | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|-------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | 103b | % of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014) | Quarterly | 88.00% | 90.00% | 87.50% | 67.00% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Red | | 147 | % of care leavers in suitable accommodation aged 17-21 (19-21 until 2016/2017) | Quarterly | 95.00% | 92.00% | 97.44% | 89.87% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 81.00% | 83.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 86.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Comparator Data | Annual | 83.20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 65 | % of children becoming the subject of a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time (YTD) | Quarterly | 12.20% | 25.70% | 28.38% | 41.38% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 16.60% | 17.90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 15.40% | 16.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Comparator Data | Annual | 17.39% | 19.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CSS7 | % of adopted children who wait \<14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years) | Quarterly | 62.22% | 64.00% | 67.00% | 73.00% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 15.40% | 16.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 17.39% | 19.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Comparator Data | Annual | 17.39% | 19.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CYPL1 | Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot) | Quarterly | 25 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-25 years) (New for 2016/17) | Quarterly | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | CYPL2c | Number of Early Help Assessments initiated | Quarterly | 243 | 171 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | EFL1 | Children Looked After per 10k (Snapshot) | Quarterly | 53 | 53 | 55 | 54.32 | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | EFL2 | Children with a Child Protection Plan per 10k (Snapshot) | Quarterly | 34 | 37 | 46 | 40.81 | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | MI Pack 1 | Number of referrals - (YTD) | Monthly | 790 | 689 | 1,216 | 234 | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | MI Pack 2 | Number of children starting to be looked after (CLA) who have previously been looked after - (YTD) | Monthly | 13 | 13 | 16 | 3 | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Indicator | Description | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|-------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | PEI8 | % of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot) | Quarterly | 81.00% | 80.00% | 87.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TF2-A01 | Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) | Quarterly | 52 | 500 | 742 | 761 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | TF2-A01i | Number of Troubled Families On-Programme (New for 2016/17) | Quarterly | - | - | 474 | 488 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TF2-A02 | % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome | Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | 45 | % of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD) | Quarterly | 32.40% | 35.60% | 20.40% | 17.60% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | | % of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD) | Quarterly | 11.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | % of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD) | Quarterly | 43.80% | 45.70% | 27.80% | 33.30% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | PHOF23 | First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17) | Annual | 413.64 | 451.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 409.06 | 368.65 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 473.02 | 425.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 7 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 117c | % of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot) | Monthly | - | - | 3.30% | 3.20% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | - | 3.00% | 3.10% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | - | 3.40% | 3.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Comparator Data | Quarterly | - | - | 2.40% | 2.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | KS4a | Average Progress 8 score from KS2 to KS4 | Annual | - | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | - | -0.03 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | No. | Indicator | Description | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----|-----------|-------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----|-----|-----|-----|--------|----------|-----| | 04. | RM5 | % of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot) | Annual | 18.00% | 12.00% | (Avail 2017) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 04. | RM6 | % of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot) | Annual | 11.00% | 0.00% | (Avail 2017) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | 05. | 81 | %pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot) | Annual | 41.70% | 32.00% | (Avail Apr 2018) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 05. | 81 | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 24.60% | 24.50% | (Avail Apr 2018) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 05. | 81 | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 27.30% | 27.60% | (Avail Apr 2018) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 05. | 81 | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 15 | 13 | (Avail Apr 2018) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | 87a | Secondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms) (relates to prev academic year to financial year shown) | Discontinued | 5.70% | NC | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | 87aa | Secondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms) (relates to prev academic year to financial year shown) (New for 2015/2016) | Annual | - | 12.40% | (Avail Dec 2017) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | PHOF22 | % of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence) | Annual | 4.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | PHOF22 | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 4.62% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | PHOF22 | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 4.79% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | PHOF22 | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 06. | RM16 | Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sector | Annual | 546 | 462 | (Avail Sep 2017) | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | 07. | RM91 | School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - % | Quarterly | 22.00% | 22.00% | 24.00% | 24.00% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | 07. | RM93 | School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - % | Quarterly | 65.00% | 63.00% | 69.00% | 69.00% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | 07. | RM95 | School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - % | Quarterly | 11.00% | 10.00% | 1.50% | 1.50% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | 07. Ofsted Ratings | 08. Free School Meals | 09. Health | |-------------------|----------------------|-----------| | **RM97** | **PriFSM** | **NCMP01** | | School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -% | % of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) | % of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year) | | Quarterly | Annual | Annual | | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.03% | | 2.00% | 8.60% | 8.59% | | 5.50% | 7.80% | - | | 5.50% | - | - | | - | - | - | | - | - | - | | Target | Polarity | DOT | | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | - | Neutral | Neutral | | **RM98** | **SecFSM** | **NCMP02** | | % of pupils attending good or outstanding schools (new for 2016/17) (snapshot) | % of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) | % of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year) | | Annual | Annual | Annual | | N/A | 6.70% | 14.97% | | 91.20% | 6.30% | 15.14% | | 91.20% | 6.20% | - | | 91.60% | - | - | | - | - | - | | - | - | - | | Target | Polarity | DOT | | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | - | Neutral | Neutral | | **NCMP01** | **NCMP02** | **TAP10** | | % of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year) | % of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year) | % of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow up | | Annual | Annual | Quarterly | | 7.03% | 14.97% | NC | | 8.59% | 15.14% | NC | | - | - | 80.75% | | - | - | 79.20% | | - | - | - | | - | - | - | | Target | Polarity | DOT | | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | - | Neutral | Neutral | | Health | 09. | TAP10 | % of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow up | Quarterly | NC | NC | 4.96% | 6.64% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | |--------|-----|-------|---------------------------------|----------|----|----|-------|-------|----|----|----|----|-----------|---------| | 10. Employment | AS1 | % of young people aged 16-18 in Apprenticeships (as a proportion of 16-18 previously in a York Secondary School) | Annual | 6.80% | 8.20% | 8.20% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | AS2 | Number of Apprenticeships starts - York resident young people aged 16-18 (relates to prev academic year to financial year shown) | Annual | 358 | 430 | 440 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | AS3 | Number of Apprenticeships starts - York resident young people aged 19-24 (relates to prev academic year to financial year shown) | Annual | 487 | 520 | 510 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | AS4 | Number of Apprenticeships starts - York resident young people aged 25+ (relates to prev academic year to financial year shown) | Annual | 457 | 750 | 770 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green |