## Portfolio - Economy and Community Engagement 2017/2018

No of Indicators = 35 | Direction of Travel (DoT) shows the trend of how an indicator is performing against its Polarity over time.

Produced by the Strategic Business Intelligence Hub August 2017

### Previous Years vs 2017/2018

| Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | emp1 % of working age population in employment (16-64) | Quarterly | 74.10% | 76.00% | 77.50% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 5 | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | CJGE71 Employment Rate (Male) | Quarterly | 77.80% | 80.00% | 80.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 4 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | CJGE72 Employment Rate (Female) | Quarterly | 70.40% | 72.10% | 75.10% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 6 | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | CJGE03 York’s unemployment rate below the national | Quarterly | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.70% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | CJGE05 % of Part time employees | Quarterly | 31.40% | 28.90% | 31.30% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 25.50% | 25.30% | 25.30% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 26.70% | 27.50% | 27.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 15 | 11 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP14 % of panel who work inside York area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 79.91% | 77.84% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of panel who work outside York area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 20.09% | 22.16% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP15 % of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in York | Quarterly | NC | NC | 72.34% | 68.13% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in York | Quarterly | NC | NC | 16.60% | 19.23% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP16 % of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of York | Quarterly | NC | NC | 35.86% | 41.48% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of York | Quarterly | NC | NC | 51.52% | 46.59% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP17 % of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrain | Quarterly | NC | NC | 19.29% | 19.02% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | TAP17 % of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrain | Quarterly | NC | NC | 67.51% | 67.48% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP18 % of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the city | Quarterly | NC | NC | 41.04% | 41.74% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the city | Quarterly | NC | NC | 28.08% | 27.29% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | TOU25 % of jobs which are tourism based | Annual | 18.20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | CJGE16 Earnings gap between the 25 percentile and the median (£) (York) | Annual | £115.2 | £128.3 | £137.4 | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 476.9 | 496 | 509.6 | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 521.1 | 529.6 | 541 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 9 | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE14 Median earnings of residents – Gross Weekly Pay (£) | Annual | 98.9 | 85.1 | 120.2 | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 99.6 | 99.7 | 100.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 101.3 | 99.3 | 108 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 6 | 5 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE68 JSA Claimants: % of Working Age Population (16-64) | Monthly | 0.80% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.40% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Monthly | 2.00% | 1.50% | 1.20% | 1.10% | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Monthly | 2.70% | 2.00% | 1.60% | 1.50% | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Monthly | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | CJGE09 % Total Benefit Claimants (Working Age 16-64) | Quarterly | 7.30% | 6.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 12.50% | 11.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 14.10% | 13.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE151 JSA and UC (Out of Work) % of working age population (16 - 64) | Monthly | NC | 0.70% | 0.70% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Monthly | NC | 1.90% | 2.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Monthly | NC | 2.30% | 2.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE23 % of vacant city centre shops | Monthly | 5.99% | 7.70% | 9.16% | 9.21% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | CJGE29 Business Deaths | Annual | 710 | 665 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 6 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE30 GVA per head (£) | Annual | 23,977 | 24,003 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 12) | Annual | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE31 Total GVA (£ billion) | Annual | 4.95 | 5.13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 11) | Annual | 11 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CJGE32 Business Startups - (YTD) | Monthly | 1,144 | 1,012 | 974 | 244 | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | PP01 % of businesses reporting that contact with officers was helpful | Annual | 97.28% | 98.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | PP03 % of businesses reporting that the information provided was useful | Annual | 98.14% | 98.10% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | TAP19 % of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growth | Quarterly | NC | NC | 43.53% | 44.58% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | No of Indicators | 35 | |------------------|----| | Direction of Travel (DoT) shows the trend of how an indicator is performing against its Polarity over time. |

Produced by the Strategic Business Intelligence Hub August 2017

| Previous Years | 2017/2018 | |----------------|-----------| | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | | TAP19 | % of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growth | Quarterly | NC | NC | 28.79% | 26.89% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | ▼ Green | | TOU14 | Parliament Street Footfall | Monthly | 9,616,941 | 8,356,697 | 8,044,607 | 2,058,005 | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | ◄ Neutral | | TOU24 | Average expenditure per domestic day visit | Annual | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | ◄ Neutral | | CJGE17 | % of working age population qualified - No qualifications | Annual | 4.80% | 4.60% | 6.20% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | ▼ Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 8.80% | 8.60% | 8.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 9.80% | 9.80% | 9.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | TAP01 | % of panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live | Quarterly | NC | NC | 89.84% | 91.23% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | ▲ Green | | Benchmark - Community Life Survey | Annual | 86.00% | 86.00% | 78.03% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - LG Inform | Annual | 81.00% | 82.60% | 80.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | TAP05 | % of panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live | Quarterly | NC | NC | 6.18% | 6.80% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | ◄ Neutral | | TAP06 | % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months | Quarterly | NC | NC | 60.81% | 62.81% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | ▲ Green | | % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months | Quarterly | NC | NC | 7.47% | 7.35% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | ▼ Green | | TAP07 | % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 89.20% | 89.53% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | ▲ Green | | % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 10.40% | 9.58% | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | ▼ Green | | Benchmark - Community Life Survey | Annual | 72.00% | 71.00% | 61.56% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - LG Inform | Annual | 66.30% | 66.80% | 69.17% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 6. Community Engagement | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-------------------------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | TAP07 % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 25.10% | 19.11% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | TAP11 % of panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 25.65% | 28.41% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Benchmark - Community Life Survey | Annual | 35.00% | 36.00% | 26.53% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | TAP12 % of panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 39.96% | 37.22% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | TAP13 % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 90.85% | 90.27% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area | Quarterly | NC | NC | 7.36% | 7.74% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Community Life Survey | Annual | 69.00% | 70.00% | 62.68% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | % of panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisation | Quarterly | NC | NC | 64.30% | 66.44% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | % of panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisation | Quarterly | NC | NC | 32.66% | 30.65% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green |