| Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | ASCOF1E | Proportion of adults with a learning disability in paid employment | Monthly | 13.70% | 9.70% | 8.33% | 8.45% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Red | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 6.00% | 5.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 6.60% | 6.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 9 | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | ASCOF1G | Proportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with family | Monthly | 91.80% | 82.60% | 82.26% | 81.43% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 73.30% | 75.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 81.40% | 78.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 5 | 48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | ASCOF1H | Proportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support | Annual | 55.10% | 28.50% | 39.21% | 49.35% | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 59.70% | 58.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 67.20% | 64.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 113 | 144 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 14 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 13 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | | | Adult Social Care | Previous Years | 2017/2018 | |------------------|---------------|-----------| | | Collection | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | | Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would like | Annual | 46.60% | 45.80% | 50.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 44.80% | 45.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 45.70% | 46.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 46 | 70 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 7 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 6 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) (YTD Cumulative) (New definition for 2015/16) | Monthly | 9.9 | 11.3 | 11.27 | 2.98 | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 14.2 | 13.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 11.5 | 13.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 50 | 64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 5 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 11 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | ASCOF2 | Previous Years | 2017/2018 | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |--------|----------------|-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----|-----|-----|-----|--------|----------|-----| | A2 | Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) (YTD Cumulative) (New definition for 2015/16) | Monthly | 630.8 | 683.1 | 656.1 | 141.29 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 668.8 | 628.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 726.9 | 699.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 72 | 92 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 6 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 8 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | C1 | Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population - (YTD Average) | Monthly | 11.6 | 13.2 | 16.85 | NC | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 11.1 | 12.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 9.6 | 10.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 102 | 103 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 11 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 11 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | C2 | Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population - (YTD Average) | Monthly | 6.3 | 6.9 | 7.49 | NC | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 3.7 | 4.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 3 | 3.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 133 | 123 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 14 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 5 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | ASCOF3A | Overall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and support | Annual | 67.10% | 64.00% | 62.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Red | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 64.70% | 64.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 65.90% | 63.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 44 | 82 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 7 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 5 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | ASCOF4A | Proportion of people who use services who feel safe | Annual | 62.30% | 66.90% | 71.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 68.50% | 69.20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 67.70% | 69.90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | National Rank (Rank out of 152) | Annual | 131 | 101 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 13 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | | Comparator Rank (Rank out of 16) | Annual | 16 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | PVP02 | Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+) | Monthly | 241 | 260 | 248 | 53 | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | TAP09 | % of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independently | Quarterly | NC | NC | 65.46% | 70.51% | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | | % of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independently | Quarterly | NC | NC | 26.10% | 23.06% | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | CSB17 | Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date) | Quarterly | 26 | 33 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | LAPE03 | Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) | Annual | 11.3 | 13.3 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 16.1 | 15.9 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 17.6 | 17.1 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | LAPE04 | Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) | Annual | 7.6 | N/A | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 7.4 | N/A | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 8.1 | N/A | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 5 | N/A | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | LAPE22 | % successful completions from alcohol treatment | Quarterly | 31.60% | 40.00% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 38.40% | 39.17% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | PHOF16 | Life Expectancy at birth - Female | Annual | 83.5 | 83.4 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 83.2 | 83.1 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 82.4 | 82.3 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | PHOF17 | Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period) | Annual | 5.4 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | Life Expectancy at birth - Male | Annual | 80.1 | 80.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 79.55 | 79.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 78.7 | 78.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period) | Annual | 5.8 | 7.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Number of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG) | Quarterly | 8,285.59 | 4,989.34 | 4,252.32 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rate | Annual | 63.20% | 69.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 66.10% | 67.20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 62.70% | 64.00% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 8 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia | Annual | 2,680 | 2,717 | 2,788 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year) | Annual | 16.84 | 27.7 (Prov) | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 27.67 | 14.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 25.84 | 15.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Indicator Description | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) | Annual | 176.11 | 169.27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 185.08 | 184.46 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 200.23 | 200.18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male | Annual | 101.94 | 98.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 106.22 | 104.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 119.56 | 117.59 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male | Annual | 163.27 | 154.45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 157.67 | 154.84 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 169.88 | 166.88 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 4 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male | Annual | 16.45 | 18.51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 23.39 | 23.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 23.72 | 23.47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | PHOF67 | Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male | Annual | 36.24 | 32.98 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 38.25 | 38.51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 43.8 | 42.58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | PHOF72 | Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) | Annual | 54.49 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 63.16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 63.94 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | NCMP01 | % of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year) | Annual | 7.03% | 8.59% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 9.08% | 9.31% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 8.83% | 9.42% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | NCMP02 | % of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year) | Annual | 14.97% | 15.14% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 19.08% | 19.82% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 19.19% | 20.29% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | % of physically active and inactive adults - active adults | Annual | 62.18% | 69.83% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 57.04% | 57.05% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 56.08% | 56.35% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | % of active and inactive adults - inactive adults | Annual | 21.57% | 17.54% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 27.73% | 28.65% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 29.21% | 29.12% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | % of adults classified as overweight or obese | Annual | 56.88% | 56.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 64.59% | 64.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 67.09% | 67.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 population | Annual | 10.27 | 9.32 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 11.96 | 11.87 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 13.28 | 13.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 4 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 population | Annual | 552.96 | 675.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 398.8 | 430.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 367.9 | 384.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Public Health and Wellbeing | Previous Years | 2017/2018 | |-----------------------------|---------------|-----------| | | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | | CMHD02 | IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG) | Quarterly | 307.08 | 468.52 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 838.72 | 860.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 909.29 | 897.15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | CMHD03 | % of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved "reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG) | Quarterly | 61.40% | 63.64% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 61.62% | 63.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 60.17% | 63.11% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | EH1 | Chlamydia diagnoses (15-24 year olds), per 100,000 population | Annual | 1,682.5 | 1,462 | 1,838 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 2,035.3 | 1,887 | 1,882 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 2,240.1 | 2,031.4 | 2,072 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 13 | 14 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | | EH2 | Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia | Annual | 23.60% | 22.30% | 22.50% | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 24.50% | 22.50% | 20.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 24.50% | 21.20% | 19.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV01 | % of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 days | Quarterly | - | 74.40% | 78.30% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 87.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 86.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Public Health and Wellbeing | Previous Years | 2017/2018 | |-----------------------------|---------------|-----------| | | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | | HV02 % of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 days | Quarterly | - | 21.70% | 12.77% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 9.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 10.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV03 % of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeks | Quarterly | - | 70.80% | 77.09% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 82.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 86.40% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV04 % of infants being breastfed at 6-8wks | Quarterly | - | 30.10% | 44.23% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 43.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 36.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV05 % of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 months | Quarterly | - | 16.77% | 41.65% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 73.60% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 82.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV06 % of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 months | Quarterly | - | 70.00% | 76.92% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 82.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 88.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | HV07 % of children who received a 2-2½ year review | Quarterly | - | 11.60% | 18.55% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | - | 74.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | - | 81.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Indicator Description | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year) | Quarterly | 15.71 | 20.41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 22.8 | 20.78 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 26.35 | 24.31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check | Quarterly | 38.11% | 70.67% | 72.50% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 37.94% | 56.44% | 74.10% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 31.33% | 49.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 4 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check | Quarterly | 39.35% | 37.57% | 37.40% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 48.93% | 48.59% | 48.90% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 52.23% | 48.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 12 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check | Quarterly | 14.99% | 26.55% | 27.10% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 18.56% | 27.42% | 36.20% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 16.36% | 24.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Quarterly | 7 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral |

## Portfolio - Adult Social Care and Health 2017/2018

No of Indicators = 62 | Direction of Travel (DoT) shows the trend of how an indicator is performing against its Polarity over time.

Produced by the Strategic Business Intelligence Hub August 2017

| Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | **PHOF27** | Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year) | Annual | 2.13 | 1.82 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 4.38 | 3.73 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 5.49 | 4.45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **PHOF31** | % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check | Quarterly | 7.32% | 9.81% | 0.20% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 9.62% | 8.99% | 8.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **PHOF32** | Suicide rate (per 100,000 population) | Annual | 9.94 | 13.98 | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 8.94 | 10.15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 9.26 | 10.72 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 11 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **PHOF79** | HIV late diagnosis | Annual | 56.30% | 68.80% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 42.20% | 40.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 49.70% | 48.20% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 3 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **NGPP01** | Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupations | Annual | 15.24% | 13.19% | - | - | - | - | - | Neutral | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 10.93% | 9.59% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 10.12% | 9.58% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Indicator | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | PHOF10 % of women who smoke at the time of delivery | Quarterly | 10.80% | 12.06% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Red | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 11.38% | 10.65% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 15.56% | 14.53% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | PHOF20 % of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS) | Annual | 32.80% | 28.20% | 26.40% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 29.60% | 28.10% | 26.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 32.50% | 30.00% | 28.90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 9 | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | PHOF45 % of population smoking (APS) | Annual | 17.24% | 14.63% | 12.60% | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Bad | Green | | Benchmark - National Data | Annual | 19.86% | 18.63% | 15.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Annual | 17.85% | 16.93% | 17.70% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 4 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | PHOF76 % of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months) | Quarterly | 5.20% | 5.50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 7.38% | 6.80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 6.24% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Substance Abuse | Collection Frequency | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Target | Polarity | DOT | |-----------------|----------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----|----|----|----|--------|----------|-----| | % of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months) | Quarterly | 40.10% | 31.10% | - | - | - | - | - | - | Up is Good | Neutral | | Benchmark - National Data | Quarterly | 39.19% | 37.30% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Benchmark - Regional Data | Quarterly | 40.19% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Regional Rank (Rank out of 15) | Annual | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |