<document>
<doctype type="OTHER">
<docheader>
<DISPOSITION></DISPOSITION>
</docheader>
<section>
<p style="TITLE">(ORDER LIST: 524 U.S.)<left></p>
<p style="SYLCTC"><font b="1">FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 1998<center></p>
<p>

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-232    EDDY POTASH, INC. V. HARRISON, JEANNE<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for<left></p>
<p>

              further consideration in light of <font i="1">Faragher<font> v. <font i="1">City of<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">Boca Raton<font>, 524 U. S. _____ (1998).<left></p>
<p>

97-726    REYNOLDS, ARLENE V. CSX TRANSP., INC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit<left></p>
<p>

              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">Faragher<font> v. <font i="1">City<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">of Boca Raton<font>, 524 U. S. _____ (1998).<left></p>
<p>

97-1058   STEWART, DIR., AZ DOC, ET AL V. FALCONE, KENNETH JOHN<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for<left></p>
<p>

              further consideration in light of <font i="1">Monge<font> v. <font i="1">California<font>,<left></p>
<p>

              524 U. S. _____ (1998).<left></p>
<p>

97-1777   B.C. ROGERS PROCESSORS V. BOC GROUP, INC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit<left></p>
<p>

              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">Lexecon, Inc<font>. v.<left></p>
<p>

              <font i="1">Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach<font>, 523 U. S. _____<left></p>
<p>

              (1998).<left></p>
<p>

97-5760   DICKEY, BILLY D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> and the petition for a writ of certiorari<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">              are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the<left></p>
<p>

              Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of<left></p>
<p>

              <font i="1">Lindh<font> v. <font i="1">Murphy<font>, 520 U. S. _____ (1997).<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ORDERS IN PENDING CASES<center></p>
<p style="Normal">M-82      DARRELL K. BERRY V. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition<left></p>
<p>

              for a writ of certiorari out-of-time under Rule 14.5 <left></p>
<p>

              denied.<left></p>
<p>

M-83      SYLVESTER ABRAMS V. PAUL BARNETT, WARDEN<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">M-87      SAMMY DAVID ROBERTS V. MICHAEL L. MOORE, DIRECTOR, SOUTH<left></p>
<p style="Normal">            CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions<left></p>
<p>

              for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.<left></p>
<p style="Normal">97-826  ) AT&T CORP., ET AL. V. IA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-829  ) MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. V. IA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-830  ) ASSN. FOR LOCAL TELECOM. V. IA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-831  ) FCC, ET AL. V. IA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1075 ) AMERITECH CORP., ET AL. V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1087 ) GTE MIDWEST V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1099 ) U S WEST, INC. V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1141 ) SO. NEW ENGLAND TEL., ET AL. V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Solicitor General for divided<left></p>
<p>

              argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in<left></p>
<p>

              the consideration or decision of this motion.<left></p>
<p>

97-889    WRIGHT, CEASAR V. UNIVERSAL MARITIME SERV.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to<left></p>
<p>

              participate in oral argument as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> and for<left></p>
<p>

              divided argument is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-930    BUCKLEY, SEC. OF ST. OF CO V. AM. CONST. LAW FNDN., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Initiative & Referendum Institute for<left></p>
<p>

              leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> is granted. The<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">              motion of National Voter Outreach, Inc. for leave to<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              file a brief as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-1130   PFAFF, WAYNE V. WELLS ELEC., INC.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motion of Federal Circuit Bar Association for<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-1184 ) NFFE, LOCAL 1309 V. DEPT. OF INTERIOR, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1243 ) FLRA V. DEPT. OF INTERIOR, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioners to dispense with<left></p>
<p>

              printing the joint appendix is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-1396   LOPEZ, VICKY, ET AL., V. MONTEREY COUNTY, CA, ET AL.,<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Solicitor General for leave to<left></p>
<p>

              participate in oral argument as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> and for<left></p>
<p>

              divided argument is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-1426   CRAWFORD & CO. V. SONNIER, KERMITH<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of respondent for attorney fees and<left></p>
<p>

              costs is denied without prejudice to refiling in the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.<left></p>
<p>

97-1481   LIBERTY NATL. LIFE INS. CO. V. DAY, SAMUEL L.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of respondent for attorneys' fees and<left></p>
<p>

              costs is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI GRANTED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-1642   DEPT. OF ARMY V. BLUE FOX, INC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-799    ELLERTH, KIMBERLY V. BURLINGTON INDUS., INC.<left></p>
<p>

97-801    YANKEE ATOMIC ELEC. CO. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-884    GECAS, VYTAUTAS V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1278   INMATES, SUFFOLK CTY. JAIL V. ROUSE, SHERIFF, SUFFOLK CTY.<left></p>
<p>

97-1394   SOUTHEASTERN MARITIME CO. V. BROWN, ALONZO, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1404   MALPESO, LOUIS, AKA BOBO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1440   GURNEY, CLIFFORD, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1443   MAUSOLF, JEFFREY, ET AL. V. BABBITT, SEC. OF INTERIOR<left></p>
<p>

97-1444   McLAUGHLIN, RUSSELL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1535   GEN. MEDIA COM., ET AL. V. COHEN, SEC. OF DEFENSE<left></p>
<p>

97-1541   SMITH, HEATHER, ET AL. V. METRO. SCH DIST. PERRY TNSHP<left></p>
<p>

97-1567   AM. MED. ASSN. V. PRACTICE MGMT. INFO.<left></p>
<p>

97-1578   HOECHST CELANESE CORP. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1610   BUNKER GROUP, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1618   UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH, INC. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1635   HONDURAS, ET AL. V. HONDURAS AIRCRAFT REGISTRY<left></p>
<p>

97-1646 ) NATL. ENVTL. WASTE CORP. V. RIVERSIDE, CA<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

97-1810 ) RIVERSIDE, CA V. NATL. ENVTL. WASTE CORP.<left></p>
<p>

97-1686   CAHNMANN, SUZANNE V. SPRINT CORP.<left></p>
<p>

97-1693   HADIX, EVERETT, ET AL. V. McGINNIS, KENNETH, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1735   RENDISH, KIMBERLY V. TACOMA, WA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1742   DORSEY, CATHERINE V. DORSEY, JOHN<left></p>
<p>

97-1743   COUCH, JERRY V. SPRINT CORP.<left></p>
<p>

97-1745   BARANDIARAN, JUAN, ET AL. V. TCW SPEC. CREDITS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1747   N. LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SCH. V. MARY M., ETC.<left></p>
<p>

97-1756   KENDALL, JEFFREY V. KENDALL, BARBARA<left></p>
<p>

97-1760   COASTAL PET. CO. V. CHILES, GOV. OF FL, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1763   MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS CORP. V. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.<left></p>
<p>

97-1764   BAUCHMAN, RACHEL V. WEST HIGH SCH., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1765   OGLEBAY NORTON CO. V. JENSON, LOIS E., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1781   HAYDEN, JESSICA, ET AL. V. GRAYSON, RICHARD<left></p>
<p>

97-1782   MA, STANLEY, ET AL. V. GOETSCH, MARTIN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1784   EGBERT, NELSON V. REIS, JUDY, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1785   KLEIN, SHMUEL V. GRIEVANCE COM. 9TH JUD. DIST<left></p>
<p>

97-1791   NEW IMAGE INDUSTRIES, INC. V. HIGH TECH MED. INSTRUMENTAT.<left></p>
<p>

97-1799   JUMONVILLE, JAN, ET VIR V. KENNER, LA<left></p>
<p>

97-1800   BAZZETTA, MICHELLE, ET AL. V. McGINNIS, DIR., MI DOC<left></p>
<p>

97-1801   POLLIN, HAROLD S. V. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE<left></p>
<p>

97-1804   TOTH, SUE V. MI STATE HOUSING DEV. AUTH.<left></p>
<p>

97-1819   LAMBING, BARBARA LYNN V. GODIVA CHOCOLATIER<left></p>
<p>

97-1827   SMITH, DAVID L. V. COLORADO SUPREME COURT<left></p>
<p>

97-1831   WORTHY, TEMPIE FORTSON V. COLLAGEN CORP.<left></p>
<p>

97-1833   BIALCZAK, CAROL, ET AL. V. BARNETT, RICHARD, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1843   KELLER COM., INC. V. FCC<left></p>
<p>

97-1858   SCHWARZ, THOMAS ROWE V. KOGAN, GERALD, ETC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1872   ARSHAL, GEORGE V. DALTON, SEC. OF THE NAVY<left></p>
<p>

97-1877   SHOEMAKER, CALVIN V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1884   CUMMINGS, HELEN V. WEST, SEC. OF VA<left></p>
<p>

97-1885   GARRITY, THOMAS E. V. MASSACHUSETTS<left></p>
<p>

97-1887   VINGI, DEBRA V. RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1907   DOUCETTE, CLAIRE V. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DIST.<left></p>
<p>

97-1908   CHAVEZ-RAMIREZ, DAVID V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-1913   SHERWOOD, STEPHEN, ET UX. V. CIR<left></p>
<p>

97-1932   GAGLIARDI, JOHN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-5745   SANCHEZ, RICARDO R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-6813   CHAVEZ, LIONEL P. V. CALIFORNIA<left></p>
<p>

97-7420   GAVIN, MICHAEL P., ET AL. V. BRANSTAD, TERRY, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-7558   MARSH, SWINETTA B. V. DALLAS INDEP. SCHOOL DIST.<left></p>
<p>

97-7829   BLODGETT, PAUL A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-7876   BUTLER, HARRISON V. CALIFORNIA<left></p>
<p>

97-7890   WASHINGTON, ANTHONY V. PENNSYLVANIA<left></p>
<p>

97-7996   ELLIOTT, JOSEPH V. PENNSYLVANIA<left></p>
<p>

97-8093   WOOLLEY, MARTIN M. V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>

97-8094   THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>

97-8097   HICKEY, ARTHUR D. V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>

97-8120   DOUGAN, JACOB J. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>

97-8127   RICHARD, MICHAEL W. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

97-8291   GRIFFIN, HENRY V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>

97-8361   DIXON, TONY T. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

97-8382   TENNARD, ROBERT J. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

97-8427   LOVE, RAY D. V. TIPPY, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

97-8470   MANN, GLENN B. V. TENNESSEE<left></p>
<p>

97-8528   WOODRUFF, THOMAS A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-8536   SALAS, EDILBERTO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-8539   O'RILEY, PATRICK V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-8580   NELSON, BRUCE E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-8778   MUNOZ, MARIA G. V. MARTINEZ, CA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8794   JO-ANN G. V. CRANSTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE<left></p>
<p>

97-8803   HAMILTON, RICHARD E. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

97-8809   MADRID, ALEJANDRO V. MARSHALL, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8816   SHOWN, BUFORD E. V. OKLAHOMA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8817   SMITH, JOSEPH P. V. JARVIS, MACK, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8819   ZANKICH, JAMES V. vs. GOODNOW, GORDON J.<left></p>
<p>

97-8820   ALLMOND, DARRYL V. FAUVER, WILLIAM, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8821   BOATWRIGHT, KENNETH L. V. SINGLETARY, DIR., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>

97-8823   MONLYN, BRODERICK W. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

97-8834   FERGUSON, WILLIAM V. vs. JOHNSON, ROBERT, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8840   ROBERTS, LINDA V. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST.<left></p>
<p>

97-8843   RAYBORN, GORDON D. V. HATCHER, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8851   BROOKS, THOMAS V. MISSOURI<left></p>
<p>

97-8855   WASHINGTON, EMANUEL V. SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION, ETC<left></p>
<p>

97-8857   WHITE, DELBERT V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

97-8866   FRANKLIN, LEON V. MAZURKIEWICZ, SUPT.<left></p>
<p>

97-8876   NARY, STEVEN R. V. HENNESSEY, SHERIFF<left></p>
<p>

97-8877   KENDRICK, RICHARD W. V. GILLUHUGH, M. E., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8938   ABDULLAH, MALCOLM O. V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8953   TOLES, BRYAN A. V. OKLAHOMA<left></p>
<p>

97-8962   AYALA, STEVEN, ET AL. V. SPECKARD, SUPT., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-8980   MEYERS, ANTON D. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

97-8987   PHENIX, RAYMOND G. V. NEVADA<left></p>
<p>

97-9000   ABDESLEM, ANDY vs. U. S. EMBASSY, MANILA<left></p>
<p>

97-9002   CRAFTON, HEATHER L. K. vs. CRAFTON, JOHN P.<left></p>
<p>

97-9011   CARRILLO, ANTONIO R., ET UX. V. ARIZONA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-9020   BOOKER, DARRELL L. V. APFEL, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.<left></p>
<p>

97-9042   HOWELL, PAUL V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

97-9063   BARCENA, DUANE V. vs. IL DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH<left></p>
<p>

97-9082   DEVERY, JOHN E. V. VAUGHN, SUPT., GRATERFORD<left></p>
<p>

97-9093   SCOTT, KYLE V. NEW MEXICO<left></p>
<p>

97-9102   SMITH, RAYMOND L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9107   LYONS, JEROME P. V. TENNESSEE<left></p>
<p>

97-9125   PIERCE, ROY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9140   HILT, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9149   LARA, PETER B. V. DUNCAN, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-9159   ZAMORA-MARTINEZ, RAMON V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9162   FRASER, HELENA C. V. CIR<left></p>
<p>

97-9174   VASQUEZ, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. STINSON, SUPT., GREAT MEADOW<left></p>
<p>

97-9182   BIERI, LEONARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9183   HILL, ZANE B. V. FRENCH, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-9186   GIBBONS, FREDDIE V. LARKINS, SUPT., DALLAS<left></p>
<p>

97-9194   GUANIPA, YRAIDA L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9199   FLORES-OCHOA, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9200   THOMPSON, STEPHEN C. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9203   BAKSH, SAMSUR V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9204   CLYMORE, CRAIG R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9208   PROCTOR, ARTHUR E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9209 ) PENA, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">97-9265 ) FERREIRA, LUIS V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p style="Normal">97-9213   SNELLING, LONNIE V. HOUSING AUTHORITY<left></p>
<p>

97-9214   SILVA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9218   WHITE, COREY D. vs. IRS<left></p>
<p>

97-9220   WALTER, JOHN A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9221   COX, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9223   TAYLOR, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9231   MARUTZ, DONALD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9236   MacKALL, REGINALD E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9246   JUAREZ-JUAREZ, LEONARDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9247   CORN, JOHN E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9249   MORRIS, EDDIE D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9250   McCLAIN, THOMAS L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9252   JOHNS, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9253   LUNA-HERRERA, JAVIER V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9254   KING, MARVIN J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9257   GARCIA, ANTONIO A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9258   GONZALEZ, RICARDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9260   GALLANT, GERARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9261   FORTES, EDWIN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9266   HORTON, ALLEN E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9267   SAPP, RONALD W. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9268   PETERS, CALVIN D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9269   ROUSAN, WILLIAM V. MISSOURI<left></p>
<p>

97-9270   JILES, BERNARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9271   JONES, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9272   J. A. J. vs. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9277   BOND, JOHN B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9278   COTTON, GLENN H. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9279   PALOMO, EUGENE V. GUAM<left></p>
<p>

97-9285   WILLIAMS, DERICK D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9288   FUNCHES, ELTON L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9291   BUCK, TONY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9294   CLIPPER, TERRY T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9301   ALLERY, BRENT W. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9302   BRITO, ADRIAN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9304   LEURO-ROSAS, JORGE H. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9305   WINFIELD, ROBERT L., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9313   JOHNSON, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9314   MODRAK, GARY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9316   HARMON, ODELL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9319   SUST, ALBERTO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9326   DOLENC, JOHN V. DEMORE, DAVID<left></p>
<p>

97-9332   SHANNON, ANGELA D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9333   SARRAULTE, DAVID O. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9335   ANDRADE, YOLANDA V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9343   HERNANDEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

97-9388   FROHWIRTH, SCOTT F. V. COOKE, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for petitions for writs<left></p>
<p>

              of certiorari are denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-1144   UNITED STATES V. OOLEY, NORMAN L.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is granted. The petition for a writ of<left></p>
<p>

              certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-1630   MELENDEZ, LAURA V. METRO. LIFE INS. CO.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Citizen Action of New York, et al.<left></p>
<p>

              for leave to file a brief <font i="1">as amici curiae<font> is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-1773   THEIS RESEARCH, INC. V. OCTEL COMM. CORP., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Intellectual Property Creators, et<left></p>
<p>

              al. for leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amici curiae<font> is<left></p>
<p>

              granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is<left></p>
<p>

              denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-8837   COOPER, KEVIN V. CALDERON, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari before<left></p>
<p>

              judgment is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">HABEAS CORPUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-1952   IN RE ARTHUR ARLO HAYDEN, JR.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">MANDAMUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-8490   IN RE OTIS RUDD<left></p>
<p>

97-8802   IN RE TERRY SNYDER, ET AL. <left></p>
<p>

97-8861   IN RE ROBERTO BAEZ<left></p>
<p>

97-8928   IN RE LESTER M. AYARS<left></p>
<p>

97-9237   IN RE ALEXANDER IFEANYI IJEMBA<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">PROHIBITION DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-1789   IN RE CHARLES A. EIDSON<left></p>
<p>

97-8864   IN RE ROLF BETKA<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">REHEARINGS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-1494   GREB, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. GMC<left></p>
<p>

97-1533   McDUFFIE, ERNEST, ETC. V. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK<left></p>
<p>

97-1540   WALKER, DAVID V. MI PUBL. SVC. COMMN., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-7568   SHAW, ROBERT M. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

97-7841   IN RE DAVID McDOWELL ROBINSON<left></p>
<p>

97-8141   CUTHBERT, SCOTT A. V. DIST. COURT OF APPEAL OF FL<left></p>
<p>

97-8525   IN RE ALVIN WASHINGTON<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-885    ENGELHART, PAUL, ET AL. V. CONRAIL CORP., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-1527   RUCK, LANCE V. UN. TRANSP. UNION, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motions for leave to file petitions for<left></p>
<p>

              rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE<center></p>
<p style="Normal">D-1933    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS EWING PHILLIPS<left></p>
<p>

                   Thomas Ewing Phillips, of Chillicothe, Ohio, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 6, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              requiring him to show cause why he should not be<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Thomas Ewing Phillips is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1936    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL IRA GREER<left></p>
<p>

                   Michael Ira Greer, of Poway, California, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 20, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Michael Ira Greer is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1938    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SETH R. ROTTER<left></p>
<p>

                   Seth R. Rotter, of New York, New York, having been<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 20, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Seth R. Rotter is disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1939    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EUGENE J. IRONS<left></p>
<p>

                   Eugene J. Irons, of Mesa, Arizona, having been<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 20, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Eugene J. Irons is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1942    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EPHRAIM COLLINS<left></p>
<p>

                   Ephraim Collins, of Boca Raton, Florida, having been<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 27, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Ephraim Collins is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1943    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY LEWIS KANTOR<left></p>
<p>

                   Further consideration of the Rule to Show<left></p>
<p>

              Cause is deferred.<left></p>
<p>

D-1944    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SYLVIA E. HALL<left></p>
<p>

                   Sylvia E. Hall, of Deep Water, New Jersey, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of April 27, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Sylvia E. Hall is disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1946    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD EARL BLUMENTHAL<left></p>
<p>

                   Howard Earl Blumenthal, of Marina Del Rey,<left></p>
<p>

              California, having been suspended from the practice of<left></p>
<p>

              law in this Court by order of May 4, 1998; and a rule<left></p>
<p>

              having been issued and served upon him requiring him to<left></p>
<p>

              show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time<left></p>
<p>

              to file a response having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Howard Earl Blumenthal is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1947    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY MICHAEL KRUPA<left></p>
<p>

                   Stanley Michael Krupa, of Middletown, Connecticut,<left></p>
<p>

              having been suspended from the practice of law in this<left></p>
<p>

              Court by order of May 4, 1998; and a rule having been<left></p>
<p>

              issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Stanley Michael Krupa is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1951    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT A. BREEZE<left></p>
<p>

                   Robert A. Breeze, of San Diego, California, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of May 18, 1998; and a rule having been issued and<left></p>
<p>

              served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and a response having been<left></p>
<p>

              filed;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Robert A. Breeze is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1965    IN THE MATTER OF  MICHAEL SWEIG MENDELSON<left></p>
<p>

                   Michael Sweig Mendelson, of Chicago, Illinois,<left></p>
<p>

              having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of<left></p>
<p>

              this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from<left></p>
<p>

              the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law<left></p>
<p>

              before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on<left></p>
<p>

              June 15, 1998, is discharged.<left></p>
<p>

D-1972    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DOUGLAS JAMES HYNES<left></p>
<p>

                   Douglas James Hynes, of Farmingdale, New York, is<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a<left></p>
<p>

              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring<left></p>
<p>

              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1973    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FREDRICK S. FALICK<left></p>
<p>

                   Fredrick S. Falick, of Middletown, New York, is<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a<left></p>
<p>

              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring<left></p>
<p>

              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">RECESS ORDER<center></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The Court will take a recess from today until the<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              first Monday in October, 1998, at which time the October<left></p>
<p>

              1997 Term will adjourn.<left></p>
</section>
</document>