(ORDER LIST: 520 U.S.)
  (ORDER LIST: 520 U.S.)

                          MONDAY, MARCH 31, 1997
                          MONDAY, MARCH 31, 1997

                         ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
                         ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

  M-67      ROBERT H. WILLIAMS V. BORG & WARNER AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONICS
            AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION

  M-68      JOHN BABIGIAN V. WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE
            UNITED STATES, ET AL.

  M-69      KENNETH MICHAEL ROWLS V. MARVIN RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL

                     The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions

                for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

  95-1081   INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, ET AL. V. DIR., OWCP, ET AL.

                     The motion of respondent Maggie Yates for

                attorney's fees and expenses is denied without

                prejudice to refiling in the United States Court of

                Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

  95-1918   ARKANSAS V. FARM CREDIT SVCS., ET AL.

                     The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for

                leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae
                                                         _____________

                and for divided argument is granted.

  96-552  ) AGOSTINI, RACHEL, ET AL. V. FELTON, BETTY-LOUISE, ET AL.
          )
  96-553  ) CHANCELLOR, BD. OF ED. OF NY V. FELTON, BETTY-LOUISE, ET AL.

                     The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for

                divided argument is granted.

  96-663    KLEHR, MARVIN, ET UX. vs. A. O. SMITH CORP., ET AL.

                     The motion of American Council of Life Insurance, et al.

                for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae
                                                             ____________

                is denied.

  96-5955   RICHARDS, STEINEY V. WISCONSIN

                     The motion of Wayne County, Michigan, for leave to

                                        1

                file a brief as amicus curiae is denied.
                                _____________

                                        2

                            CERTIORARI GRANTED
                            CERTIORARI GRANTED

  96-957    JEFFERSON, MELVIN, ET AL. V. TARRANT, AL

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted

                limited to the following question: "Whether, when a

                decedent's death is alleged to have resulted from a

                deprivation of federal rights occurring in Alabama, the

                Alabama Wrongful Death Act, Section 6-5-410 (Ala. 1975),

                governs the recovery by the representative of the

                decedent's estate under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983?"

  96-6839   ALMENDAREZ-TORRES, HUGO R. V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
                                                                   __

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
                ______________

                are granted.

                            CERTIORARI DENIED
                            CERTIORARI DENIED

  96-859    STEVEDORING SVCS., ET AL. V. DIR., OWCP, ET AL.

  96-1052   TAK HOW INVESTMENT LTD. V. NOWAK, RALPH, ETC., ET AL.

  96-1093   CRYO-TRANS, INC. V. GEN. AM. TRANS. CORP.

  96-1098   TOPP, JOHN V. IDAHO STATE BAR

  96-1156   PRESBYTERY OF NJ, ET AL. V. WHITMAN, GOV. OF NJ, ET AL.

  96-1165   UNITED ARTISTS THEATRE V. KAHN, DIR., NO DEPT. OF FIN.

  96-1180   ROYAL KING FISHERIES, ET AL. V. FUSZEK, VILMOS

  96-1181   PA PUBL. UTIL. COMMN. V. PHILADELPHIA, PA, ET AL.

  96-1182   ANDERSON, CAROLYN DENISE V. HOLIFIELD, ROBERT, ET UX.

  96-1190   KERN, WENDY V. ROCHESTER, NY, ET AL.

  96-1193   BEARDS, EDDYEMAE, ET VIR V. BIBLE WAY CHURCH, ET AL.

  96-1195   H&D ENTERTAINMENT, ET AL. V. FLEET NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  96-1197   GOEHRING, GREGORY, ET AL. V. DEL JUNCO, TIRSO, ET AL.

  96-1199   MULLER, ANDREW J., ETC. V. JEFFERSON LIGHTHOUSE SCH.

                                        3

  96-1208   MEEHAN, HOWARD V. EAST LYME, CT, ET AL.

  96-1214   CRANE, JEFFREY V. OLSTEN STAFFING SVCS, ET AL.

                                        4

  96-1218   LAFAYETTE MOREHOUSE, ET AL. V. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA

  96-1219   MI DOCUMENT SVCS., ET AL. V. PRINCETON UNIV. PRESS, ET AL.

  96-1239   NUNES, DAVID SMITH V. FLORIDA BAR

  96-1282   DANIELS, LESTER V. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE

  96-1305   HAMPTON, JOSEPH V. ILLINOIS

  96-1308   LOVELL, MARY ANN V. HURFORD, GARY, ETC., ET AL.

  96-1313   DODSON, THOMAS V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GEN.

  96-1333   YOUNG, NORMAN HAI V. CALIFORNIA

  96-1350   FARLEY, RICHARD V. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.

  96-1353   GLOVER, DONNIE, ET AL. V. DURHAM, RUSSELL

  96-6869   ABDUL-SALAAM, SEIFULLAH V. PENNSYLVANIA

  96-6887   SAMUEL, DAVID TYRONE V. DUNCAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

  96-6914   ULLOA, MARIO V. UNITED STATES

  96-6927   HILL, WILLIAM M. V. McKEE, KEN, ET AL.

  96-7217   LOSADA, DAVIS V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

  96-7276   MILLER, JOSEPH V. ILLINOIS

  96-7422   MARSHALL, GEORGE E. V. CALIFORNIA

  96-7454   UWAGBALE, WILFRED E. V. INS

  96-7628   RICOTTA, THOMAS V. RICOTTA, ELLEN

  96-7636   ROSE, MICHAEL V. WOODS, LESLIE, ET AL.

  96-7643   JAMES, SUNNI J. V. McCLAIN, ART, ET AL.

  96-7647   MUSE, RENOALD V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL.

  96-7651   STONE, ALFRED LEE V. BYRD, GREGORY, ET AL.

  96-7655   JUDY, CODY R. V. HINCKLEY, GORDON B., ET AL.

  96-7656   AZUBUKO, CHUKWU E. V. REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES

  96-7660   COLE, NICK V. DICKMAN, WARDEN

  96-7665   LOWELL, PATRICK A. V. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL.

  96-7671   WILLIAMS, JOHN F. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC

  96-7675   FREDERICK, DAVID S. V. COLUMBIA CORR. INST., ET AL.

                                        5

  96-7676   EDMOND, ALBERT V. MARTIN, RICHARD, ET AL.

  96-7682   FOX, HARRY E. V. LOVE, SUPT.

                                        6

  96-7689   CLIFF, JAMES V. NEW YORK

  96-7694   PORTER, ROBERT V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT., CLINTON

  96-7696   PARSONS, ROBERT V. BASF CORPORATION, ET AL.

  96-7699   MADRID, JOHN A. V. CALIFORNIA

  96-7707   PICKENS, JIMMIE V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC

  96-7712   GOONEWARDENA, RUHUN S. V. UNIV. OF MINNESOTA, ET AL.

  96-7713   NORWOOD, LORENZA D. V. NORTH CAROLINA

  96-7714   JOHNSON, MARVIN V. EN VOGUE, ET AL.

  96-7715   LIGONS, RONALDO S. V. MOORE, FRANCIS B., ET AL.

  96-7716   DOBOS, AGNETA V. CIVIL SERVICE COMMN. OF LA

  96-7717   DURHAM, EARL V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC

  96-7780   LORENZ, PAUL M. V. MARTIN MARIETTA CORP., INC.

  96-7827   MORRIS, CHARLES R. V. VIRGINIA

  96-7839   TOTORO, JOSEPH P. vs. H. A. DeHART & SON, ET AL.

  96-7845   GONZALES, LARRY V. THOMAS, WARDEN, ET AL.

  96-7877   LUTALO, LATEEF A. V. WALKER, SUPT., MARION, ET AL

  96-7891   HUIE, FRANKIE D. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

  96-7893   FOSTER, JOHN L. V. WOLF, JUDGE, DCSC

  96-7911   SCOTT, MICHAEL ERIN V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC

  96-7920   JAE, JOHN R. V. KESSLER, REBECCA, ET AL.

  96-7928   POLLARD, FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES

  96-7956   AGCAOILI, ENRIQUETA B. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA

  96-7966   GOMES, DONALD F. V. NEVADA

  96-7974   BRANDENBURG, HERBERT J. V. UNITED STATES

  96-7980   RODRIGUEZ, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES

  96-8000   SULLIVAN, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES

  96-8002   TAVARES, RONALD M. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8017   GLANT, SUSAN K. V. FLORIDA BAR

  96-8020   FARRUGIA, THOMAS R. V. UNITED STATES

                                        7

  96-8037   DEVIN, JAMES V. BARNETT, WARDEN

  96-8039   ORTIZ, GUSTAVO V. UNITED STATES

                                        8

  96-8041   BEATY, MICKEY DEAN V. UNITED STATES

  96-8043   SMITH, BRIAN V. UNITED STATES

  96-8044   LEIPHARDT, RICHARD A. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8049   GOMEZ, BERNARDO V. UNITED STATES

  96-8057   CURRY, DERRICK A. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8059   BARNES, JEFFREY LANE V. UNITED STATES

  96-8060   ALEXANDER, ANTHONY COREY V. UNITED STATES

  96-8062   SAFFORD, MAURICE V. UNITED STATES

  96-8063   PETERSON, J. CHANDLER V. UNITED STATES

  96-8065   ROGERS, RUBEN DARIO V. UNITED STATES

  96-8066   DOMINGUEZ, VICTOR M. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8067   GOGGINS, DAMOND G. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8069   TAYLOR, PAUL J. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8071   LAWUARY, ANDY V. UNITED STATES

  96-8074   REED, BART V. UNITED STATES

  96-8079   BUENO-SIERRA, JORGE ELIECER V. UNITED STATES

  96-8082   BRUMFIELD, CARNELL D. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8083   RODRIGUEZ-MERAZ, MARCO V. UNITED STATES

  96-8091   ESCOBAR-GARCIA, HUGO V. UNITED STATES

  96-8092   DAVIS, RODNEY V. UNITED STATES

  96-8097   LUCK, TRACY A. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8098   McCLAIN, DALE A. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8115   CLEMONS, DARRYL V. ILLINOIS

  96-8116   YOUNG, ANDRE E. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8122   MAYS, GREGORY O. V. UNITED STATES

  96-8132   JUVENILE MALE V. UNITED STATES

                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

  96-723    LUCKY STORES, INC. V. HOLIHAN, RICHARD

                     The motion of Equal Employment Advisory Council for

                                        9

                leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
                                         _____________

                petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

                                       10

  96-1004   SHEPPARD, WILLIAM V. DIAZ, ENRIQUE

                     The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
                                                                   __

                forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
                ______________

                certiorari is denied.

  96-8058   PALMER, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioner to defer consideration of

                the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The

                petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

                             MANDAMUS DENIED
                             MANDAMUS DENIED

  96-1177   IN RE ARGEREY CONSTANT
          
  96-1178   IN RE JAMES CONSTANT

                     The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

                            REHEARINGS DENIED
                            REHEARINGS DENIED

  96-791    DAVIS, FRED V. WONDERLAND GREYHOUND PK.

  96-5594   CALDER, CRAIG PAUL V. ARMSTRONG, BRYN, ET AL.

  96-6604   CRAWFORD, JOHN V. BEXAR CTY. TAX OFFICE, ET AL.

  96-6712   PERRYMAN, JOE E. V. PRADO, JUDGE, USDC WD TX

  96-6821   PIOTEREK, GRZEGORZ V. LABOR AND INDUSTRY, ET AL.

  96-6832   COLLIGAN, CAROL V. TWA

  96-7261   OLSEN, RONALD V. FLORIDA

                     The petitions for rehearing are denied.

                           ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE
                           ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

  D-1769    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BURNS H. DAVISON, II

                     Burns H. Davison, II, of Des Moines, Iowa, having

                                       11

                been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by

                order of February 18, 1997; and a rule having been

                                       12

                issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause

                why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a

                response having expired;

                     It is ordered that Burns H. Davison, II, is

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1771    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH M. LYNN

                     Joseph M. Lynn, of San Francisco, California,

                having been suspended from the practice of law in this

                Court by order of February 18, 1997; and a rule having

                been issued requiring him to show cause why he should

                not be disbarred;

                     It is ordered that Joseph M. Lynn is disbarred from

                the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1774    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT DAVID McDONALD

                     Robert David McDonald, of Great Falls, Virginia,

                having been suspended from the practice of law in this

                Court by order of February 18, 1997; and a rule having

                been issued and served upon him requiring him to show

                cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to

                file a response having expired;

                     It is ordered that Robert David McDonald is

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1791    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM EDWARD GROWNEY

                     William Edward Growney, of Pacifica, California, is

                suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

                rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

                him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

                the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1792    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HENRY WILLIAM SANDS

                                       13

                     Henry William Sands, of Los Angeles, California, is

                suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

                                       14

                rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

                him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

                the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1793    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARRY BOEHME, JR.

                     Harry Boehme, Jr., of Miami, Florida, is suspended

                from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will

                issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show

                cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice

                of law in this Court.

  D-1794    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HUGH T. ECHOLS

                     Hugh T. Echols, of Houston, Texas, is suspended

                from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will

                issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show

                cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice

                of law in this Court.

  D-1796    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JIM D. HAMILTON

                     Jim D. Hamilton, of Houston, Texas, is suspended

                from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will

                issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show

                cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice

                of law in this Court.

                                       15