*Pages 1--8 from  Microsoft Word - 56292.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793  Before  the 
 Federal  Communications  Commission  Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  the  Matter  of  )  ) 
 Amendment  of  Section  73.202(  b),  )  MB  Docket  No.  06-  77  Table  of  Allotments,  )  RM-  11324 
 FM  Broadcast  Stations.  )  (Hodgenville,  Horse  Cave,  Lebanon,  ) 
 Lebanon  Junction,  New  Haven  and  Springfield,  )  Kentucky,  and  Belle  Meade,  Goodlettsville,  ) 
 Hendersonville,  Manchester,  and  Millersville,  )  Tennessee)  ) 


 NOTICE  OF  PROPOSED  RULE  MAKING 
 Adopted:  April  5,  2006  Released:  April  7,  2006  Comment  Date:  May  30,  2006 
 Reply  Comment  Date:  June  13,  2006 
 By  the  Assistant  Chief,  Audio  Division,  Media  Bureau: 
 1.  The  Audio  Division  has  before  it  a  proposal  filed  jointly  by  Elizabethtown  CBC,  Inc.,  licensee  of  Station  WKMO,  Channel  292A,  Hodgenville,  Kentucky,  and  Station  WTHX,  Channel  297A,  Lebanon 
 Junction,  Kentucky;  CBC  of  Marion  County,  Inc.,  licensee  of  Station  WLSK,  Channel  265A,  Lebanon,  Kentucky;  Washington  County  CBC,  Inc.,  licensee  Station  WAKY-  FM,  Channel  274A,  Springfield, 
 Kentucky;  Newberry  Broadcasting,  Inc.,  licensee  of  Station  WHHT,  Channel  294A,  Horse  Cave,  Kentucky;  and  Cumulus  Licensing  LLC,  licensee  of  Station  WNFN,  Channel  294A,  Belle  Meade,  Tennessee,  Station 
 WWTN,  Channel  259C,  Manchester,  Tennessee,  Station  WQQK,  Channel  221A,  Hendersonville,  Tennessee,  and  Station  WRQQ,  Channel  246C2,  Goodlettsville,  Tennessee,  (collectively,  the  Joint  Parties).  The 
 Amended  Proposal  sets  forth  interrelated  proposals  involving  nine  existing  stations  in  Kentucky  and  Tennessee.  We  will  discuss  each  of  these  proposals  below. 


 I.  PRELIMINARY  MATTER 
 2.  In  Connersville,  Madison  and  Richmond,  Indiana,  Erlanger  and  Lebanon,  Kentucky,  and  Norwood,  Ohio,  and  Lebanon,  Lebanon  Junction,  New  Haven  and  Springfield,  Kentucky,  we  dismissed  a 
 similar  proposal  filed  by  the  Joint  Parties  1  because  the  proposed  reallotment  of  Channel  259C  from  Manchester  to  Hendersonville,  Tennessee,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WWTN  license  to  specify 
 Hendersonville  as  the  community  of  license,  would  contravene  Section  73.208(  a)(  1)(  i)  of  the  Commissions  rules.  2  Specifically,  this  reallotment  would  be  short-  spaced  to  the  pending  modification  application  for  Station 
 WRJF,  Channel  260C3,  Eva,  Alabama.  3  The  Joint  Parties  filed  a  Petition  for  Reconsideration  directed  to  that 


 1  Report  and  Order,  20  FCC  Rcd  1887  (MB  2005). 
 2  47  C.  F.  R.    73.208(  a)(  1)(  i). 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 2 
 dismissal.  Thereafter,  Cumulus  Licensing  LLC,  licensee  of  Station  WWTN  and  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  dismissed  its  pending  application  to  maintain  Class  C  status  for  Station  WWTN  and  accepted  the  modification 
 of  its  license  to  Class  C0.  4  In  this  regard,  a  Channel  259C0  reallotment  to  Hendersonville  would  not  be  short-spaced  to  the  pending  application  at  Eva.  As  requested  by  the  Joint  Parties,  we  are  going  forward  with  the 
 Amended  Proposal  in  this  Notice.  5 
 3.  The  Joint  Parties  proposal  includes  nine  city  of  license  modifications.  These  requests  are  filed  pursuant  to  Section  1.420(  i)  of  the  Commissions  rules  which  permits  the  modification  of  a  stations 
 authorization  to  specify  a  new  community  of  license  without  affording  other  interested  parties  an  opportunity  to  file  a  competing  expression  of  interest.  6  In  evaluating  a  proposal,  we  compare  the  existing  versus  the 
 proposed  arrangement  of  allotments  using  the  FM  allotment  priorities  set  forth  in  Revision  of  FM  Assignment  Policies  and  Procedures.  7 


 Belle  Meade  and  Millersville,  Tennessee 
 4.  The  Joint  Parties  propose  the  substitution  of  Channel  294C3  for  Channel  294A  at  Belle  Meade,  reallotment  of  Channel  294C3  to  Millersville,  and  modification  of  its  Station  WNFN  license  to  specify 
 operation  on  Channel  294C3  at  Millersville,  Tennessee.  8  This  will  result  in  a  first  local  service  to  Millersville.  As  discussed  below,  Belle  Meade  would  continue  to  receive  local  service  from  Station  WRQQ.  The  area  and 
 population  that  will  lose  service  will  continue  to  receive  in  excess  of  five  aural  services.  9 
 3  File  No.  BPH-  20031009AAY. 


 4  On  January  13,  2006,  Cumulus  Licensing  requested  dismissal  of  its  application  (File  No.  BPH-  20040827ACB) 
 and  accepted  Class  C0  status. 


 5  In  Taccoa,  Sugar  Hill  and  Lawrenceville,  Georgia,  Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order,  16  FCC  Rcd  21191  (MMB 
 2001),  we  announced  that  we  would  carefully  review  any  counterproposal  filed  by  the  initial  rulemaking  proponent  and  require  an  explanation  as  to  why  the  counterproposal  could  not  have  been  advanced  in  the  original  petition  for 


 rule  making.  In  the  absence  of  such  an  explanation,  the  subsequent  proposal  will  be  processed  as  a  new  petition  for  rule  making.  The  Joint  Parties  have  not  addressed  this  issue.  Accordingly,  we  are  processing  the  Amended 
 Proposal  in  a  separate  proceeding. 
 6  See  Modification  of  FM  and  TV  Authorizations  to  Specify  a  new  Community  of  License  (  Community  of 
 License),  Report  and  Order,  4  FCC  Rcd  4870  (1989),  recon.  granted  in  part,  Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order,  5  FCC  Rcd  7094  (1990). 


 7  Revision  of  FM  Assignment  Policies  and  Procedures,  Second  Report  and  Order,  90  FCC  2d  88  (1988).  The  FM 
 allotment  priorities  are:  (1)  First  fulltime  aural  service;  (2)  Second  fulltime  aural  service;  (3)  First  local  service;  and  (4)  Other  public  interest  matters.  Co-  equal  weight  is  given  to  Priorities  (2)  and  (3). 


 8  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  proposed  Channel  294C3  allotment  at  Millersville,  Tennessee,  are  36-  26-  24  and 
 86-  37-  39. 


 9  The  Commission  has  considered  five  or  more  reception  services  to  be  abundant.  Family  Broadcasting  Group, 
2
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 3 
 5.  We  recognize  that  both  Belle  Meade  and  Millersville  are  located  within  the  Nashville-  Davidson  Urbanized  Area  and  that  Station  WNFN  will  provide  a  70  dBu  signal  to  more  than  20  percent  of  the 
 Urbanized  Area.  We  are  concerned  with  the  potential  migration  of  stations  from  lesser  served  rural  areas  to  well-  served  urban  areas.  For  this  reason,  we  will  not  blindly  apply  a  first  local  service  preference  of  the  FM 
 allotment  priorities  when  a  station  seeks  to  reallot  its  channel  to  a  suburban  community  in  or  near  an  Urbanized  Area.  In  making  a  first  local  service  preference  determination,  we  apply  existing  precedent.  10  We 
 consider  the  extent  the  station  will  provide  service  to  the  entire  Urbanized  Area,  the  relative  populations  of  the  suburban  and  central  city,  and  most  importantly,  the  independence  of  the  suburban  community.  Because 
 Belle  Meade  and  Millersville  are  already  located  in  the  Nashville-  Davidson  Urbanized  Area,  this  relocation  does  not  implicate  Commission  policy  with  respect  to  the  migration  of  stations  from  rural  to  urban  areas.  11  In 
 any  event,  the  Joint  Parties  have  submitted  a  Tuck  exhibit  demonstrating  that  Millersville  is  independent  of  the  Nashville-  Davidson  Urbanized  Area  and  entitled  to  consideration  as  a  first  local  service. 


 6.  In  order  to  accommodate  Channel  294C3  at  Millersville,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the  substitution  of  Channel  293A  for  Channel  294A  at  Horse  Cave,  Kentucky,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WHHT  license 
 to  specify  operation  on  Channel  293A.  12  Newberry  Broadcasting,  Inc.,  licensee  of  Station  WHHT  and  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  has  agreed  to  the  channel  substitution.  To  accommodate  the  Channel  293A  substitution  at 
 Horse  Cave,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the  substitution  of  Channel  297A  for  Channel  292A  at  Hodgenville,  Kentucky,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WKMO  license  to  specify  operation  on  Channel  297A.  13 
 Elizabethtown  Broadcasting,  Inc.,  licensee  of  Station  WKMO  and  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  has  agreed  to  the  channel  substitution  and  change  in  transmitter  site.  In  order  to  accommodate  the  Channel  297A  substitution  at 
 Hodgenville,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the  substitution  of  Channel  257A  for  Channel  297A  at  Lebanon  Junction,  Kentucky,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WTHX  license  to  specify  operation  on  Channel  257A.  14 
 Elizabethtown  Broadcasting,  Inc.  is  also  the  licensee  of  Station  WTHX  and  has  again  agreed  to  the  channel  substitution  and  change  in  transmitter  site. 


 7.  In  order  to  replace  the  loss  of  the  sole  local  service  at  Belle  Meade,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the 
 (Rev.  Bd.  1983),  rev.  denied  FCC  83-  559  (Commn  Nov.  29,  1983);  see  also  LaGrange  and  Rollingwood,  Texas,  10  FCC  Rcd  3337  (1995). 


 10  See  e.  g.  Huntington  Broadcasting  Co.  v.  FCC,  192  F.  2d  33  (D.  C.  Cir.  1951);  RKO  General,  Inc.  (KFRC), 
 Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order,  5  FCC  Rcd  3222  (1990);  Faye  and  Richard  Tuck,  Memorandum  Opinion  and  Order,  3  FCC  Rcd  5374  (1988)(  Tuck). 


 11  See  Boulder  and  Lafayette,  Colorado,  Notice  of  Proposed  Rule  Making,  11  FCC  Rcd  3632  (MMB  1996);  East 
 Los  Angeles,  Long  Beach  and  Frazier  Park,  California,  Report  and  Order,  10  FCC  Rcd  2864  (MMB  1995). 


 12  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  293A  allotment  at  Horse  Cave,  Kentucky,  are  37-  13-  57  and  85-  52-  06. 


 13  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  297A  allotment  at  Hodgenville,  Kentucky,  are  37-  40-  34  and  85-  40-  57. 
 14  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  257A  allotment  at  Lebanon  Junction,  Kentucky,  are  37-  44-  37  and  85- 
 38-  52. 
3
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 4 
 reallotment  of  Channel  246C2  from  Goodlettsville,  Tennessee,  to  Belle  Meade,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WRQQ  license  to  specify  Belle  Meade  as  the  community  of  license.  15  This  reallotment  will  not 
 require  a  change  a  change  in  the  Station  WRQQ  transmitter  site.  To  avoid  depriving  Goodlettsville  of  its  sole  local  service,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the  reallotment  of  Channel  221A  from  Hendersonville  to  Goodlettsville 
 and  modification  of  the  Station  WQQK  license  to  specify  Goodlettsville  as  the  community  of  license.  16  This  reallotment  does  not  require  relocation  of  the  Station  WQQK  transmitter  site  and  Cumulus  Licensing  LLC, 
 licensee  of  Station  WQQK  and  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  has  agreed  to  the  change  in  community  of  license.  In  order  to  avoid  the  loss  of  the  sole  local  service  at  Hendersonville,  the  Joint  Parties  propose  the  substitution  of 
 Channel  259C0  for  Channel  259C  at  Manchester,  Tennessee,  reallotment  of  Channel  259C0  from  Manchester  to  Hendersonville,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WWTN  license  to  specify  operation  on  Channel  259C0.  17 
 Cumulus  Licensing  LLC,  licensee  of  Station  WWTN,  has  agreed  to  the  reclassification  and  change  in  community  of  license.  18 


 Springfield  and  New  Haven,  Kentucky 
 8.  The  Joint  Parties  also  propose  the  reallotment  of  Channel  274A  from  Springfield  to  New  Haven,  Kentucky,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WAKY-  FM  license  to  specify  New  Haven  as  the  community  of 
 license.  19  This  will  provide  a  first  local  service  to  New  Haven.  New  Haven  is  an  incorporated  community  with  a  2000  U.  S.  Census  population  of  849  persons.  This  reallotment  will  result  in  a  net  service  gain  to 
 47,602  persons  while  the  population  losing  service  will  continue  to  receive  at  least  five  aural  services.  New  Haven  is  not  located  in  any  Urbanized  Area  and  Station  WAKY-  FM  will  not  provide  a  70  dBu  signal  to  any 
 portion  of  an  Urbanized  Area.  Washington  County  CBC,  Inc.,  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  is  the  licensee  of  Station  WAKY-  FM.  In  order  to  replace  the  loss  of  the  sole  local  service  at  Springfield,  the  Joint  Parties 
 propose  the  substitution  of  Channel  265A  for  Channel  265C3  at  Lebanon,  Kentucky,  reallotment  of  Channel  265A  to  Springfield,  and  modification  of  the  Station  WLSK  license  to  specify  operation  on  Channel  265A  at 
 Springfield.  20  CBC  of  Marion  County,  Inc.,  one  of  the  Joint  Parties,  has  agreed  to  the  downgrade  and 
 15  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  246C2  allotment  at  Belle  Meade,  Tennessee,  are  36-  17-  50  and  86-  45- 
 11. 


 16  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  221A  allotment  at  Goodlettsville,  Tennessee,  are  36-  17-  50  and  86-  45- 
 11. 


 17  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  259C0  allotment  at  Hendersonville,  Tennessee,  are  35-  49-  03  and  86- 
 31-  24. 


 18  In  a  separate  proceeding  in  MB  Docket  No.  05-  17,  the  Joint  Parties  filed  a  Petition  for  Reconsideration  directed 
 against  our  action  dismissing  its  proposal  which  included  the  proposed  reallotment  of  Channel  259C  from  Manchester  to  Hendersonville  as  a  Class  C  allotment.  Connersville,  Madison  and  Richmond,  Indiana,  Erlanger, 


 Lebanon,  Lebanon  Junction,  New  Haven  and  Springfield,  Kentucky,  and  Norwood,  Ohio,  Report  and  Order,  20  FCC  Rcd  18871  (MB  2005).  The  Joint  parties  have  requested  that  the  Petition  for  Reconsideration  in  MB  Docket 
 No.  05-  17  be  dismissed. 
 19  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  274A  allotment  at  New  Haven,  Kentucky,  are  37-  46-  07  and  85-  35-  57. 
 20  The  reference  coordinates  for  the  Channel  265A  allotment  at  Springfield,  Kentucky,  are  37-  38-  50  and  85-  11-  50. 
4
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 5 
 reallotment.  Lebanon  will  continue  to  receive  local  service  from  AM  Station  WLBN. 
 9.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  this  proposal  will  result  in  two  communities  receiving  first  local  service,  we  believe  that  it  would  serve  the  public  interest  to  solicit  comments  on  this  proposal.  Therefore,  we  seek 
 comments  on  the  proposed  amendments  to  the  FM  table  of  Allotments,  Section  73.202(  b)  of  the  Commissions  Rules,  with  respect  to  the  following  communities: 


 Channel  No.  City  Present  Proposed 
 Hodgenville,  Kentucky  292A  297A  Horse  Cave,  Kentucky  294A  293A 
 Lebanon,  Kentucky  265C3  ------  Lebanon  Junction,  Kentucky  297A  257A 
 New  Haven,  Kentucky  -------  274A  Springfield,  Kentucky  274A  265A 
 Belle  Meade,  Tennessee  294A  246C2  Goodlettsville,  Tennessee  246C2  221A 
 Hendersonville,  Tennessee  221A  259C0  Manchester,  Tennessee  259C0,  268A  268A 
 Millersville,  Tennessee  -------  294C3 
 10.  The  Commission's  authority  to  institute  rule  making  proceedings,  showings  required,  cut-  off  procedures,  and  filing  requirements  are  contained  in  the  attached  Appendix  and  are  incorporated  by  reference 
 herein.  In  particular,  we  note  that  a  showing  of  continuing  interest  is  required  by  paragraph  2  of  the  Appendix  before  a  channel  will  be  allotted. 


 11.  Interested  parties  may  file  comments  on  or  before  May  30,  2006,  and  reply  comments  on  or  before  June  13,  2006,  and  are  advised  to  read  the  Appendix  for  the  proper  procedures.  Comments  should  be 
 filed  with  the  Federal  Communications  Commission,  Office  of  the  Secretary,  445  Twelfth  Street,  S.  W.;  TW-A325,  Washington,  D.  C.  20554.  Additionally,  a  copy  of  such  comments  should  be  served  on  the  petitioners, 
 or  their  counsel  or  consultant,  as  follows: 
 Mark  N.  Lipp,  Esq.  John  F.  Garziglia,  Esq.  Vinson  &  Elkins,  L.  L.  P.  Womble,  Carlyle,  Sandridge  &  Rice 


 1455  Pennsylvania  Ave.,  NW  1401  Eye  Street,  NW  Suite  600  Washington,  D.  C.  20006 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20004 
 12.  The  Commission  has  determined  that  the  relevant  provisions  of  the  Regulatory  Flexibility  Act  of  1980  do  not  apply  to  rule  making  proceedings  to  amend  the  FM  Table  of  Allotments,  Section  73.202(  b)  of  the 
 Commission's  Rules.  See  Certification  that  Sections  603  and  604  of  the  Regulatory  Flexibility  Act  Do  Not  Apply  to  Rule  Making  to  Amend  Sections  73.202(  b),  and  73.606(  b)  of  the  Commission's  Rules,  46  FR  11549, 
 February  9,  1981. 
5
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 6 
 13.  For  further  information  concerning  this  proceeding,  contact  Robert  Hayne,  Media  Bureau,  (202)  418-  2180.  For  purposes  of  this  restricted  notice  and  comment  rule  making  proceeding,  members  of  the  public 
 are  advised  that  no  ex  parte  presentations  are  permitted  from  the  time  the  Commission  adopts  a  Notice  of  Proposed  Rule  Making  until  the  proceeding  has  been  decided  and  such  decision  is  no  longer  subject  to 
 reconsideration  by  the  Commission  or  review  by  any  court.  An  ex  parte  presentation  is  not  prohibited  if  specifically  requested  by  the  Commission  or  staff  for  the  clarification  or  adduction  of  evidence  or  resolution  of 
 issues  in  the  proceeding.  However,  any  new  written  information  elicited  from  such  a  request  or  a  summary  of  any  new  oral  information  shall  be  served  by  the  person  making  the  presentation  upon  the  other  parties  to  the 
 proceeding  unless  the  Commission  specifically  waives  this  service  requirement.  Any  comment  which  has  not  been  served  on  the  petitioner  constitutes  an  ex  parte  presentation  and  shall  not  be  considered  in  the 
 proceeding.  Any  reply  comment  which  has  not  been  served  on  the  person(  s)  who  filed  the  comment,  to  which  the  reply  is  directed,  constitutes  an  ex  parte  presentation  and  shall  not  be  considered  in  the  proceeding. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 John  A.  Karousos  Assistant  Chief, 
 Audio  Division  Media  Bureau 


 Attachment:  Appendix 
6
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 7 
 APPENDIX 
 1.  Pursuant  to  authority  contained  in  Sections  4(  i),  5(  c)(  1),  303(  g)  and  (r),  and  307(  b)  of  the  Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and  Sections  0.61,  0.204(  b)  and  0.283  of  the 
 Commission's  Rules,  IT  IS  PROPOSED  TO  AMEND  the  FM  (TV)  Table  of  Allotments,  Section  73.202(  b)  (73.606(  b))  of  the  Commission's  Rules  and  Regulations,  as  set  forth  in  the  Notice  of 
 Proposed  Rule  Making  to  which  this  Appendix  is  attached. 
 2.  Showings  Required.  Comments  are  invited  on  the  proposal(  s)  discussed  in  the  Notice  of  Proposed  Rule  Making  to  which  this  Appendix  is  attached.  Proponent(  s)  will  be  expected  to  answer 
 whatever  questions  are  presented  in  initial  comments.  The  proponent  of  a  proposed  allotment  is  also  expected  to  file  comments  even  if  it  only  resubmits  or  incorporates  by  reference  its  former  pleadings. 
 It  should  also  restate  its  present  intention  to  apply  for  the  channel  if  it  is  allotted  and,  if  authorized,  to  build  a  station  promptly.  Failure  to  file  may  lead  to  denial  of  the  request. 


 3.  Cut-  off  Procedures.  The  following  procedures  will  govern  the  consideration  of  filings  in  this  proceeding. 
 (a)  Counterproposals  advanced  in  this  proceeding  itself  will  be  considered,  if  advanced  in  initial  comments,  so  that  parties  may  comment  on  them  in  reply  comments.  They  will  not  be  considered  if 
 advanced  in  reply  comments.  (See  Section  1.420(  d)  of  the  Commission's  Rules.) 
 (b)  With  respect  to  petitions  for  rule  making  which  conflict  with  the  proposal(  s)  in  this  Notice,  they  will  be  considered  as  comments  in  the  proceeding,  and  Public  Notice  to  this  effect  will  be  given 
 as  long  as  they  are  filed  before  the  date  for  filing  initial  comments  herein.  If  they  are  filed  later  than  that,  they  will  not  be  considered  in  connection  with  the  decision  in  this  docket. 


 (c)  The  filing  of  a  counterproposal  may  lead  the  Commission  to  allot  a  different  channel  than  was  requested  for  any  of  the  communities  involved. 
 4.  Comments  and  Reply  Comments;  Service.  Pursuant  to  applicable  procedures  set  out  in  Sections  1.415  and  1.420  of  the  Commission's  Rules  and  Regulations,  interested  parties  may  file 
 comments  and  reply  comments  on  or  before  the  dates  set  forth  in  the  Notice  of  Proposed  Rule  Making  to  which  this  Appendix  is  attached.  All  submissions  by  parties  to  this  proceeding  or  by 
 persons  acting  on  behalf  of  such  parties  must  be  made  in  written  comments,  reply  comments,  or  other  appropriate  pleadings.  Comments  shall  be  served  on  the  petitioner  by  the  person  filing  the 
 comments.  Reply  comments  shall  be  served  on  the  person(  s)  who  filed  comments  to  which  the  reply  is  directed.  Such  comments  and  reply  comments  shall  be  accompanied  by  a  certificate  of  service. 
 (See  Section  1.420(  a),  (b)  and  (c)  of  the  Commission's  Rules.)  Comments  should  be  filed  with  the  Secretary,  Federal  Communications  Commission,  Washington,  D.  C.  20554. 


 5.  Number  of  Copies.  In  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Section  1.420  of  the  Commission's 
7
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  793 
 8 
 Rules  and  Regulations,  an  original  and  four  copies  of  all  comments,  reply  comments,  pleadings,  briefs,  or  other  documents  shall  be  furnished  the  Commission. 
 6.  Public  Inspection  of  Filings.  All  filings  made  in  this  proceeding  will  be  available  for  examination  by  interested  parties  during  regular  business  hours  in  the  Commission's  Reference 
 Information  Center  (Room  CY-  A257),  at  its  headquarters,  445  Twelfth  Street,  SW.,  Washington,  D.  C. 
8