[4830-01-u]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 26, 301 and 602
[TD 8644]
RIN 1545-AJ11
RIN 1545-AL75
RIN 1545-AO89
Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax
AGENCY:  Internal Revenue Service, Treasury
ACTION:  Final and temporary regulations
SUMMARY:  This document contains final generation-skipping
transfer (GST) tax regulations under chapter 13 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code), as added by section 1431 of the Tax Reform
Act of 1986.  Changes to the applicable law were made by the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act
of 1988, and the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989.  The
regulations are necessary to provide guidance to taxpayers so
that they may comply with chapter 13 of the Code.
DATES:  These regulations are effective December 27, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  James F. Hogan, (202) 622-3090
(not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
     The collection of information requirements contained in
these final regulations have been reviewed and approved by the
Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control numbers 1545-0985
(relating to 26.2601-1 and 26.2662-2) and 1545-1358 (relating
to 26.2632-1, 26.2642-1, 26.2642-2, 26.2642-3, 26.2642-4 and
26.2652-2).  All of these paperwork requirements will be
consolidated under control number 1545-0985.  Responses to this
collection of information are required to ensure the proper
collection of the generation-skipping transfer tax.
     An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection unless the collection of
information displays a valid control number.
     The estimated burden per respondent is 1 hour under control
number 1545-0985.  The time estimates for the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements under control number 1545-1358 are
included in the estimates of burden applicable to Forms 706,
706NA, 706GS(T), 706GS(D), 706GS(D-1), and 709.
     Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and
suggestions for reducing this burden should be directed to the
Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer
T:FP, Washington, DC 20224, and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of Treasury, Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503.
     Books or records relating to this collection of information
must be retained as long as their contents may become material in
the administration of any internal revenue law.  Generally, tax
returns and tax return information are confidential, as required
by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Background
     On March 15, 1988, the IRS published in the Federal Register
a notice of proposed rulemaking (53 FR 8469) by cross reference
to Temporary Regulations published on the same date in the
Federal Register (53 FR 8441) under 2601 and 2662.
Subsequently, on December 24, 1992, the IRS published a second
notice of proposed rulemaking (57 FR 61353) amending the prior
notice.  Also, on December 24, 1992, the IRS published a notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (57 FR 61356)
containing proposed regulations under 2611, 2612, 2613, 2632,
2641, 2642, 2652, 2653, 2654, and 2663.  The IRS received written
and oral comments on the proposed regulations and, on April 21,
1993, a public hearing was held.  These documents adopt final
regulations with respect to these notices of proposed rulemaking.
     The following is a discussion of the more significant
revisions that were made.
                    Section 2601 - Transitional Rules
Transfers after September 25, 1985 and before October 23, 1986
     Section 26.2601-1(a)(2)(i), relating to inter vivos
transfers made after September 25, 1985, and before October 23,
1986, clarifies that chapter 13 applies to inter vivos transfers
that are subject to chapter 12 even though a gift tax is not
actually paid because of, for example, the marital deduction or
the unified credit.
     Section 26.2601-1(a)(2)(ii) (which treats inter vivos
transfers made after September 25, 1985, and before October 23,
1986, as if made on October 23, 1986) clarifies that the value of
the transferred property for purposes of chapter 13 is determined
as of the actual transfer date rather than as of the deemed
transfer date of October 23, 1986.
     Section 26.2601-1(a)(4) adds an example illustrating that
26.2601-1(a)(2) does not apply to transfers made under a
revocable trust that becomes irrevocable by reason of the
grantor's death after September 25, 1985, but before October 23,
1986.  Those transfers are not subject to chapter 13 because they
are in the nature of testamentary transfers that occurred prior
to October 23, 1986.
     Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(ii)(C) clarifies that incidents of
ownership in an insurance policy that are relinquished before
September 25, 1985, are not to be taken into account in
determining whether a trust is irrevocable for purposes of
26.2601-1(b)(1), which exempts trusts that were irrevocable on
September 25, 1985, from the provisions of chapter 13.
     Under 26.2601-1(b)(1)(iii)(A), a qualified terminable
interest property (QTIP) trust that is grandfathered under
26.2601-1(b)(1) is treated as if the reverse QTIP election had
been made under section 2652(a)(3).  Example 1 in 26.2601-
1(b)(1)(iii)(B) has been revised to illustrate that the initial
QTIP election under section 2523(f) need not be made before
September 25, 1985, provided that the trust was irrevocable on
that date.  Further, 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(C) has been revised to
provide that in the case of a trust with respect to which a
reverse QTIP election is deemed to have been made, the failure to
exercise the right of reimbursement under section 2207A will not
be treated as a constructive addition to the trust.  This
conforms the treatment of trusts that are irrevocable on
September 25, 1985, with the rule provided in 26.2652-1(a)(3)
which applies to trusts created after September 25, 1985.
     In 26.2601-1(b)(2)(iv)(B), the phrase "or to a generation-
skipping trust" has been added to eliminate any implication that
the provision is limited to situations involving direct skips.
The provision applies to all generation-skipping transfers.
     Section 26.2601-1(b)(3)(iii) applies the transitional rules
where the decedent was under a mental disability but had not been
adjudged a mental incompetent.  This section has been clarified
to provide that any evidence submitted to establish the
decedent's state of incompetency is not conclusive and is subject
to examination.  In addition, an example has been added to
illustrate the transitional rules applicable in the case of
mental incompetency.
Uniform statutory rule against perpetuities
     The notice of proposed rulemaking published on December 24,
1992, (57 FR 61353) contained a proposed modification to
26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2).  Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2)
provided that the exercise of a nongeneral power of appointment
will not be treated as an addition to a grandfathered GST trust
if the power is exercised in a manner that may not postpone or
suspend the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation
of a interest in property for a period, measured from the date of
creation of the trust, extending beyond any life in being at the
date of creation of the trust plus a period of 21 years
(perpetuities period).
     The proposed modification to 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2),
which is finalized in this document, provides that the exercise
of a nongeneral power of appointment that validly postpones or
suspends the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation
of an interest in property for a term of years that will not
exceed 90 years (measured from the date of creation of the trust)
will not be considered an exercise that postpones vesting, etc.,
beyond the perpetuities period.  The modification takes into
account the fact that many states have adopted the Uniform
Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (USRAP) which allows either a
90 year perpetuities period or the common law perpetuities
period.  Under 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2), as modified, the
nongeneral power may not be exercised in a manner that postpones
vesting, etc., for the longer of 90 years or the common law
period (lives in being plus 21 years).
     The discussion in the preamble published on December 24,
1992, indicates that USRAP has a "wait and see" aspect that is
not appropriate for GST purposes because it will be necessary to
determine the GST tax consequences of distributions and
terminations at the time they occur.  Thus, the preamble stated
that, in order to comply with the regulation and avoid a
constructive addition, it must be clear at the time the
nongeneral power is exercised that the exercise may not postpone
or suspend vesting, etc., beyond either lives in being plus 21
years or 90 years (but not the longer of the two periods).  A
commentator has pointed out that the USRAP invalidates any
attempt to exercise a power for the longer of the two periods.
Under the USRAP, it will be clear at the time the nongeneral
power is exercised that the exercise may not postpone or suspend
vesting, etc., beyond one of the two periods (but not both).
Under the USRAP, the common law period (lives in being plus 21
years) is imposed in the event that the power holder exercises
the power in a manner that attempts to suspend or postpone
vesting, etc., for the longer of the two periods.  Although the
preamble published on December 24, 1992, may have been misleading
in referring to a "wait and see" aspect of USRAP, the
modification to 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2) is not affected.
               Section 2611 et. seq. - GST substantive rules
Definition of generation-skipping transfers
     Section 26.2611-1 has been revised to clarify that, in
determining whether an event is subject to the GST tax, reference
must be made to the most recent transfer that was subject to
Federal estate or gift tax.  This is because the most recent
transfer that was subject to estate or gift tax establishes the
identity of the transferor, which in turn determines the identity
of the skip persons and non-skip persons.
Definitions
     Section 26.2612-1(a)(2)(i) of the proposed regulations
provides generally that, for purposes of determining whether a
transfer constitutes a direct skip, the generation assignment of
a person who would otherwise be a skip person is redetermined by
disregarding the intervening generation, if certain individuals
have died prior to the transfer (e.g., a predeceased child of the
transferor).  The section has been modified to provide that, if
an individual who is a member of the intervening generation dies
no later than 90 days after the transfer, the deceased individual
is treated as having predeceased the transferor, if the governing
instrument or applicable state law provides for such treatment.
     Section 26.2612-1(a)(2)(ii) has been added to provide that,
if a transferor makes an addition to an existing trust after the
death of an individual described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of that
section (i.e., an individual in the intervening generation), the
additional property is treated as being held in a separate trust
for purposes of chapter 13.
     Section 2612(a)(1) defines the term taxable termination to
mean the termination of an interest in property held in trust
unless, among other things, at no time after such termination may
a distribution (including distributions on termination) be made
from the trust to a skip person.  Section 26.2612-1(b)(1)(iii),
as proposed, has been revised to provide that, for purposes of
applying this rule, potential distributions to skip persons are
to be disregarded if the probability of occurrence is so remote
as to be negligible.  A similar rule has been applied to
26.2612-1(d)(2), regarding when a trust is considered a skip
person.  The probability that a distribution will occur is so
remote as to be negligible only if it can be ascertained by
actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent
probability that the distribution will occur.
     Section 26.2612-1(c)(2) has been added to clarify that the
look-through rule in section 2651(e)(2) does not apply for
purposes of determining whether a transfer from one trust to
another trust is a taxable distribution.  Thus, the transfer is
treated as having been made to the recipient trust rather than to
the beneficiaries of that trust.  Accordingly, a transfer is a
taxable distribution only if the recipient trust itself is a skip
person.
     Section 26.2612-1(e)(3) has been added to provide that, in
determining whether a trust is a skip person, trust interests
disclaimed pursuant to a qualified disclaimer described in
section 2518 are not taken into account.
     Example 3 has been added to 26.2612-1(f) to illustrate that
a transfer to a trust pursuant to which a beneficiary who is a
skip person has a withdrawal power is not a direct skip unless
the trust is a skip person.
     Example 9 has been added to 26.2612-1(f) to illustrate that
a taxable termination may occur upon the distribution of the
entire trust property (less amounts retained to pay a resulting
GST tax and administration expenses).
     Example 14 contained in 26.2612-1(f) of the proposed
regulations illustrates that an individual is not treated as
having an interest in a trust for purposes of Chapter 13, if the
individual's support obligation could be satisfied at the
discretion of the trustee.  This example has been renumbered as
Example 15 and has been clarified to provide that an individual
will have an interest in the trust if the trustee is required to
make distributions for the beneficiary's support, in satisfaction
of the individual's support obligation.
Allocation of GST exemption
     Under 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii)(A) of the proposed regulations, a
late allocation of GST exemption is effective on the date the
Form 709 reporting the allocation is filed, and is deemed to
precede in point of time any taxable event occurring on that
date.  This section has been revised to specify that the Form 709
is treated as filed on the date it is mailed to the appropriate
IRS Service Center.  Further, the late allocation may be made on
a timely filed Form 709 reporting another transfer.
     Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii)(B) has been added to clarify how
the GST exemption allocated on a Federal gift tax return (Form
709) is to be apportioned in the event that the amount allocated
on the return exceeds the value of the transfers reported on the
return.
     Example 4 of 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) of the proposed
regulations has been revised to better illustrate the effective
date of a late allocation of GST exemption.
     Example 5 of 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) has been added to
illustrate the automatic allocation of GST exemption to inter
vivos direct skips in situations where split gift treatment is
elected on an initial gift tax return filed after its due date.
     Section 26.2632-1(d)(1) has been revised to provide that a
late allocation of GST exemption made by an executor with respect
to an inter vivos transfer not included in the gross estate, is
effective as of the date the allocation is filed.  This rule does
not apply to any automatic allocation under section 2632(b)(1).
This revision conforms the regulation to section 2642(b)(3).
Estate tax inclusion period
      As proposed, 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii) provided that an estate
tax inclusion period (ETIP) exists during the period in which the
transferred property would have been includible in the
transferor's gross estate had the transferor retained an interest
held by the transferor's spouse, but only to the extent the
spouse acquired the interest from the transferor in an inter
vivos transfer that was not included in the transferor's taxable
gifts or for which a deduction was allowed under section 2523.
Commentators stated that there was no support in the statute for
this spousal rule, and any such rule would require a legislative
change.  The final regulations eliminate this spousal rule and
Example 5 of 26.2632-1(c)(5).
     Section 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii)(A) has been added to provide
that the ETIP rules do not apply when the possibility that the
property will be included in the gross estate of the transferor
(or the transferor's spouse) is so remote as to be negligible.
Further, 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii)(B) has been added to provide that
transferred property will not be treated as being subject to
inclusion in the transferor's spouse's gross estate, and thus,
subject to an ETIP, where the only power possessed by the spouse
is a right to withdraw no more than the greater of 5 percent or
$5,000 of the trust's corpus and the withdrawal right terminates
within 60 days of the transfer to the trust.
     Section 26.2632-1(c)(5) Example 3, of the proposed
regulations illustrates that if a transferor's spouse elects
gift-splitting treatment with respect to the transferor's gift
that is subject to an ETIP, the spouse is treated as the
transferor of one-half of the gift.  The example has been
expanded to illustrate that, since the spouse's deemed transfer
is subject to an ETIP, if the spouse dies prior to the
termination of the trust, the spouse's executor may allocate GST
exemption to the trust.  However, the allocation will not be
effective until the ETIP terminates on the transferor's death.
Erroneous allocations
     Under the proposed regulations, allocations in excess of the
amount of the property transferred are void.  This treatment has
been expanded under the final regulations.  Thus, any allocation
to a trust that has no GST potential at the time of the
allocation, with respect to the transferor for whom the
allocation is made, is also void.  This provision is intended to
prevent the wasting of GST exemption because of an erroneous
allocation with respect to a testamentary or inter vivos
transfer.  A trust will have no GST potential only if there is no
possibility that a GST will be made from the trust with respect
to the transferor.
Determination of applicable fraction
     Section 26.2642-1(b)(2) of the proposed regulations provided
rules for determining the inclusion ratio with respect to a trust
subject to an ETIP where GSTs are made from the trust during the
ETIP.  Comments were received that the rules were unclear
regarding whether an ineffective allocation, i.e., an allocation
made prior to any distributions or terminations, would apply in
determining the amount of the transferor's unused GST exemption,
or whether such an allocation could be modified prior to an ETIP
termination.  In response to the comments, 26.2632-1(c)(1)
(providing rules for the allocation of exemption with respect to
a trust subject to an ETIP) and 26.2642-1(b)(2) clarify that an
allocation made to a trust subject to an ETIP prior to any
distribution or termination is not subject to modification or
revocation.  However, the allocation will not be effective, i.e.,
the allocation does not operate to fix the inclusion ratio of the
trust, at the time it is made.  Rather, the allocation becomes
effective as of the date of a subsequent distribution or
termination.  Section 26.2632-1(c)(5) Example 2, illustrates this
point.
     Section 26.2642-2 of the proposed regulations provides
valuation rules for determining the denominator of the applicable
fraction under section 2642.  Section 26.2642-2(a)(1) of the
final regulations specifies that, in the case of a timely
allocation of GST exemption with respect to an inter vivos
transfer, the denominator of the applicable fraction is the fair
market value of the transferred property, as finally determined
for gift tax purposes.
     Section 26.2642-2(b)(1) of the proposed regulations provides
special rules for determining the denominator of the applicable
fraction in situations involving property subject to the special
valuation rules contained in section 2032A.  Under the proposed
regulations, the special use value of the property could only be
used in determining the applicable fraction if the property was
transferred in a direct skip.  Thus, a generation-skipping trust
to which section 2032A property was transferred in a transfer
that was not a direct skip would not receive the benefit of the
favorable valuation rules of section 2032A in determining the
applicable fraction with respect to the trust.
     Comments stated that the proposed regulation was
inconsistent with section 2642(b), which provides that the
chapter 11 value must be used to determine the applicable
fraction in the case of a testamentary transfer.  Under the final
regulations, the section 2032A value of property is to be used to
determine the applicable fraction for a direct skip transfer and
for a generation-skipping trust created in a transfer other than
a direct skip.
     In the event that additional estate tax is imposed under
section 2032A(c) with respect to the property, then the
applicable fraction is redetermined as of the transferor's date
of death.  Thus, the GST tax liability with respect to any direct
skip, taxable termination, or taxable distribution occurring
prior to the recapture event would be recomputed based on the
redetermined applicable fraction, and an additional GST tax would
be due.  The taxation of any future GST transfers would also be
based on the redetermined applicable fraction.
     Sections 26.2642-2(b)(2) and (3) of the proposed regulations
contain special rules for determining the denominator of the
applicable fraction in situations involving residuary and
pecuniary payments.  Generally, in the case of a residual GST
after the payment of a pecuniary amount, the denominator of the
applicable fraction will be the estate tax value of the total
assets available to satisfy the pecuniary payment less the amount
of the pecuniary payment, provided the pecuniary payment carries
"appropriate interest" as defined in 26.2642-2(b)(4).  Under
26.2642-2(b)(4)(ii), the payment need not carry appropriate
interest if, inter alia, the payment is irrevocably "set aside"
within 15 months of the transferor's death.  The final
regulations clarify that this exception to the appropriate
interest requirement applies only if the entire payment is set
aside.  Further, the payment is treated as set aside if the
amount is segregated and held in a separate account pending
distribution.  Finally, under the proposed regulation, the
appropriate interest requirement can be satisfied if a pro rata
share of estate income is allocated to the pecuniary bequest.
The final regulations clarify that the payment of income may be
allocated pursuant to the terms of the governing instrument or
applicable local law.
     Section 26.2642-4(a)(3) of the proposed regulations
addresses a situation where a lifetime allocation is made with
respect to a trust when the trust was not subject to an ETIP, and
the trust is subsequently included in the transferor's gross
estate.  The regulation has been revised to provide that, if
additional GST exemption is allocated to the trust, the nontax
portion of the trust is determined immediately after the date of
the transferor's death.  Also, if additional GST exemption is not
allocated to the trust by the transferor's executor, the
applicable fraction does not change, if the trust was not
otherwise subject to an ETIP at the time the previous allocation
of GST exemption was made.  Further, where such property is
included in the gross estate, the denominator of the applicable
fraction is reduced to reflect any federal or state estate or
inheritance tax paid by the trust.
Definition of transferor
     Section 26.2652-1(a)(1) of the proposed regulations,
defining transferor, has been revised to specify that a surviving
spouse is treated as the transferor of a qualified domestic trust
(QDOT) described in section 2056A that is included in the
surviving spouse's gross estate for federal estate tax purposes,
assuming the trust is not subject to a reverse QTIP election
under section 2652(a)(3).  The surviving spouse is also the
transferor of any QDOT created by the surviving spouse under
section 2056(d)(2)(B).
     Section 26.2652-1(a)(4), as proposed, provided that the
creator of a special power of appointment will be treated as
making a transfer subject to estate or gift tax (and thus be
considered a transferor) if the holder of the power exercised the
power in a manner that may postpone vesting, etc., of the
property subject to the power beyond the permissible perpetuities
period.  This result is inconsistent with section 2041(a)(3),
which treats the holder of the power as making a transfer under
these circumstances.  Accordingly, the regulation has been
revised to provide that the holder of the power will be treated
as making a taxable transfer, if the holder exercises the power
in the manner prescribed.
     Section 26.2652-1(a)(5) has been added to specify that where
a donor's spouse consents to have the donor's gift treated as
made one-half by the spouse, then for purposes of chapter 13, the
spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the property
transferred by the donor.  Thus, if a donor transfers property to
a trust and retains a qualified interest as defined in section
2702(b), with the remainder to a grandchild, a consenting spouse
would be treated as the transferor of one-half the entire
property.  It was suggested that the spouse should only be
treated as the transferor of that portion of the trust
corresponding to one-half of the actuarial value of the interest
passing to the grandchild, since under section 2513, only one-
half the gift to the grandchild may be treated as made by the
consenting spouse.  However, treating the consenting spouse as
the transferor of one-half of the entire trust is consistent with
the general treatment accorded other split-interest transfers.
For example, if a transferor transferred property in trust
retaining an interest that qualified under section 2702(b), with
the remainder to the transferor's grandchild, the transferor
would be considered the transferor of the entire trust for
purposes of chapter 13, notwithstanding that, from a technical
standpoint, only the actuarial value of the gift to the
grandchild is subject to gift tax at the time of the transfer.
     Example 8 in 26.2652-1(a)(6) has been added illustrating
that a surviving spouse will not be treated as making a
contribution to a QTIP trust that is included in the spouse's
gross estate and is subject to a reverse QTIP election, where the
spouse directs in the will that the estate tax generated by the
inclusion of the trust is to be paid from the spouse's probate
estate.
Separate shares treated as separate trusts
     Section 26.2654-1 of the proposed regulations provides rules
under which "separate shares" of a single trust that satisfy the
requirements of the regulations will be recognized as separate
trusts for GST purposes.
     Under the proposed regulations, a mandatory payment of a
pecuniary amount is treated as a separate share of a trust (and
thus, a separate trust for GST purposes) if certain conditions
are satisfied.  The section is clarified to specify that a
mandatory payment is a payment that is nondiscretionary and
noncontingent; i.e., the payment must be made in all events.
     A sentence was added to Example 3, now contained in
26.2654-1(a)(5), to clarify that, where a decedent's probate
estate pours over to a revocable trust, and then amounts are
distributed pursuant to the terms of the trust, the distributions
will be treated as separate shares for purposes of chapter 13.
     Example 4, now contained in 26.2654-1(a)(5), has been
revised to specify that the bequest of a pecuniary amount payable
in kind is not treated as a separate share of the trust, since,
under the facts presented, neither the trust nor local law
requires that the assets distributed in satisfaction of the
bequest fairly reflect net appreciation and depreciation.  This
is the result regardless of whether the assets are distributed
within 15 months of the transferor's death.
     Comments received suggested that the regulations should
allow separate trust treatment whenever a single inter vivos
trust was recognized as separate trusts under local law.  For
example, an inter vivos trust provides income to child for life,
but when each grandchild reaches age 35, a separate trust is to
be established for the child, the grandchild, and the
grandchild's issue.  Comments suggested that the Service should
recognize each trust established when a grandchild reaches age 35
as a separate trust, and allow a late allocation of GST exemption
specifically to that trust when severance occurs.
     This suggestion was rejected.  Generally, the adoption of
this approach would effectively allow the allocation of GST
exemption to specific distributions from a GST trust, rather than
to the entire trust.  This result would be contrary to the clear
language of the statute.  See, e.g., sections 2642(a)(1)(A) and
(a)(2).
Division of a single trust into separate trusts
     Under 26.2654-1(c) of the proposed regulations, a
testamentary trust could be severed into several parts, provided
the severance was commenced prior to the filing of the estate tax
return.  Further, the new trusts created pursuant to the
severance had to be identical to the old trusts.  For example, a
testamentary trust providing for income to spouse, remainder to
be divided equally between child and grandchild could only be
severed into two trusts both providing income to spouse with the
remainder to be divided between child and grandchild.  Finally,
an inter vivos trust could not be severed unless it consisted of
separate shares, or different transferors had contributed to the
trust.
     The regulation has been clarified to specify that the
division of a single trust that is included in the transferor's
gross estate will be recognized if either: (1) the single trust
consists of separate shares and is thus, treated as separate
trusts; or (2) the single trust, although not consisting of
separate shares, is severed into separate trusts pursuant to a
direction in the governing instrument providing that the trust is
to be divided into separate trusts on the transferor's death; or
(3) the governing instrument does not require or direct severance
but the trust is severed pursuant to the discretionary authority
of the trustee granted under the governing instrument or local
law.
     The final regulations provide that the trusts resulting from
the severance of a single testamentary trust need not be
identical.  Thus, if the trust provides income to spouse,
remainder to child and grandchild, the trust may be severed to
create two trusts, one with income to spouse, remainder to child
and a second with income to spouse remainder to grandchild.  This
result could be achieved through proper estate planning in any
event.  However, the regulations make it clear that the resulting
trusts must provide for the same succession of interests as
provided for under the original trust.  Thus, a trust providing
for an income interest to a child, with remainder to a
grandchild, could not be divided into one trust for the child
(equal in value to the child's income interest) and another for
the grandchild.
     The proposed regulations provided that the new trusts must
be funded with a fractional share of each and every asset held by
the original single trust.  The provision has been revised to
provide that the new trusts may also be funded on a nonpro rata
basis, based on the fair market value of the assets selected on
the date of severance.  Thus, the executor or trustee may select
the assets with which to fund each trust, and need not
fractionalize each asset.
     An example has been added to illustrate that, if a revocable
trust included in the transferor's gross estate is, under the
terms of the trust, divided into multiple trusts on the
transferor's death, then each trust established will be treated
as a separate trust for GST purposes.
Due date of return
     New 26.2662-1(d)(2) has been added to provide that the due
date of the return with respect to a taxable termination subject
to an election under section 2624(c) (relating to alternate
valuation in accordance with section 2032) is April 15th of the
following year in which the taxable termination occurred or on or
before the 15th day of the tenth month following the month in
which the death that resulted in the taxable termination
occurred, whichever is later.
Application of chapter 13 to nonresident aliens
     Section 2663(2) requires that the Commissioner prescribe
regulations, consistent with the provisions of chapters 11 and
12, providing for the application of the GST tax to a nonresident
alien (NRA).  In general, under 26.2663-2(b) as proposed, the
GST tax applied to inter vivos and testamentary direct skip
transfers by a NRA, to the extent that the transferred property
was U.S. situs property such that the transfer was subject to a
gift tax (in the case of inter vivos transfers) or an estate tax
(in the case of testamentary transfers).  Similarly, in the case
of transfers in trust, chapter 13 applied to taxable terminations
and distributions to the extent the initial transfer to the trust
(whether inter vivos or testamentary) consisted of U.S. situs
property, such that the initial transfer was subject to the gift
or estate tax.  This was the case regardless of the situs of the
property at the time of the actual distribution or termination
and regardless of the residency or citizenship of the skip person
receiving the beneficial interest or property.
     Under 26.2663-2(c) as proposed, if the property involved in
a generation-skipping transfer was not situated in the U.S. at
the time of the initial transfer, the generation-skipping
transfer was still subject to the GST tax if: (1) at the time of
the direct skip, taxable termination or distribution, the
property passes to a skip person who is a U.S. resident or
citizen; and (2) at the time of the initial transfer to the skip
person or trust, a lineal descendant of the transferor, who is a
lineal ancestor of the skip person, was a resident or citizen of
the U.S.  This rule applied regardless of the situs of the
property at the time of the actual distribution or termination.
Section 26.2663-2(f) of the proposed regulations provided for the
automatic allocation of a NRA's $1,000,000 GST exemption
regardless of whether the transfer was a direct skip.
     Thus, the proposed regulations subjected non-U.S. situs
property to the GST tax based on the status of the skip
person/recipient of the property at the time the property was
received, and the status of the generation that was skipped at
the time of the initial transfer to the trust or skip person.
     Many comments were critical of this approach.  In general,
these comments emphasized that the estate and gift tax provisions
subject transfers by NRAs to transfer tax based on the situs of
the property, not the status of the recipient.  Therefore, the
proposed regulations conflict with section 2663, which provides
that the regulations should be consistent with the principles of
chapters 11 and 12 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).  Further,
the commentators argued that treating a NRA who transfers non-
U.S. situs property as a transferor for GST tax purposes would
conflict with the definition of transferor under section 2652,
since the transfer would not be subject to estate or gift tax.
Under section 2652, an individual is a transferor only to the
extent the transfer is subject to U.S. gift tax or estate tax.
     The proposed regulations have been revised to address these
concerns.  Thus, the rules in the proposed regulations applying
chapter 13 to transfers of property that were not subject to
estate or gift tax have been eliminated.  Under the final
regulations, the application of the GST tax will be limited to
situations where an estate or gift tax is imposed on the
property.  Thus, the GST tax will apply to inter vivos and
testamentary direct skip transfers by a NRA transferor to the
extent a gift tax is imposed on the transfer (in the case of an
inter vivos transfer) or the transferred property is included in
the transferor's gross estate (in the case of a testamentary
direct skip).  In the case of taxable terminations and taxable
distributions, chapter 13 will apply to the extent a gift tax was
imposed on the initial transfer to the trust, or the property was
included in the transferor's gross estate.  Accordingly, under
the final regulations (in the absence of a situation involving an
ETIP), the application of Chapter 13 is generally dependent on
the situs of the property at the time of the initial transfer.
The regulations contain special rules for determining the
applicable fraction and inclusion ratio where a trust is funded
with both U.S. and foreign situs property.
     In general, the rules of 26.2632-1 apply with respect to
the allocation of the exemption.  However, the ETIP rule provided
in 26.2632-1(c) applies only if the property transferred by the
NRA is subsequently included in the transferor's gross estate.
The final regulations provide transitional relief with respect to
NRA's who made GST transfers and relied on the automatic
allocation rules in the proposed regulations.
Special Analyses
     It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in EO 12866.  Therefore,
a regulatory assessment is not required.  It has also been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) do not apply to these regulations, and
therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the
notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was
submitted to the Small Business Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Drafting Information
     The principal author of these regulations is James F. Hogan,
Office of the Chief Counsel, IRS.  Other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated in their development.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 26
     Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 301
     Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes,
Income taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
26 CFR part 602
     Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
     Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 26, 301, and 602 are amended as
follows:
     Paragraph 1.  Part 26 is revised to read as follows:
     PART 26--GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX REGULATIONS UNDER
THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1986
26.2600-1 Table of contents.
26.2601-1 Effective dates.
26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined.
26.2612-1 Definitions.
26.2613-1 Skip person.
26.2632-1 Allocation of GST exemption.
26.2641-1 Applicable rate of tax.
26.2642-1 Inclusion ratio.
26.2642-2 Valuation.
26.2642-3 Special rule for charitable lead annuity trusts.
26.2642-4 Redetermination of applicable fraction.
26.2642-5 Finality of inclusion ratio.
26.2652-1 Transferor defined; other definitions.
26.2652-2 Special election for qualified terminable interest
property.
26.2653-1 Taxation of multiple skips.
26.2654-1 Certain trusts treated as separate trusts.
26.2662-1 Generation-skipping transfer tax return requirements.
26.2663-1 Recapture tax under section 2032A.
26.2663-2 Application of chapter 13 to transfers by nonresidents
not citizens of the United States.
     Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 and 26 U.S.C. 2663.
Section 26.2632-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663.
Section 26.2642-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663.
Section 26.2662-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2662.
Section 26.2663-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663.
26.2600-1  Table of contents.
26.2601-1 Effective dates.
   (a) Transfers subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Certain transfers treated as if made after October 22,
       1986.
   (3) Certain trust events treated as if occurring after
       October 22, 1986.
   (4) Example.
   (b) Exceptions.
   (1) Irrevocable trusts.
   (2) Transition rule for wills or revocable trusts executed
       before October 22, 1986.
   (3) Transition rule in the case of mental incompetency.
   (4) Exceptions to additions rule.
   (c) Additional effective dates.
26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined.
26.2612-1 Definitions.
   (a) Direct skip.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Special rule for certain lineal descendants.
   (b) Taxable termination.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Partial termination.
   (c) Taxable distribution.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Look-through rule not to apply.
   (d) Skip person.
   (e) Interest in trust.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Exceptions.
   (f) Examples.
26.2613-1 Skip person.
26.2632-1 Allocation of GST exemption.
   (a) General rule.
   (b) Lifetime allocations.
   (1) Automatic allocation to direct skips.
   (2) Allocation to other transfers.
   (c) Special rules during an estate tax inclusion period.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Estate tax inclusion period defined.
   (3) Termination of an ETIP.
   (4) Treatment of direct skips.
   (5) Examples.
   (d) Allocations after the transferor's death.
   (1) Allocation by executor.
   (2) Automatic allocation after death.
26.2641-1 Applicable rate of tax.
26.2642-1 Inclusion ratio.
   (a) In general.
   (b) Numerator of applicable fraction.
   (1) In general.
   (2) GSTs occurring during an ETIP.
   (c) Denominator of applicable fraction.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Zero denominator.
   (3) Nontaxable gifts.
   (d) Examples.
26.2642-2 Valuation.
   (a) Lifetime transfers.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Special rule for late allocations during life.
   (b) Transfers at death.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Special rule for pecuniary payments.
   (3) Special rule for residual transfers after payment of a
       pecuniary payment.
   (4) Appropriate interest.
   (c) Examples.
26.2642-3 Special rule for charitable lead annuity trusts.
   (a) In general.
   (b) Adjusted GST exemption defined.
   (c) Example.
26.2642-4 Redetermination of applicable fraction.
   (a) In general.
   (1) Multiple transfers to a single trust.
   (2) Consolidation of separate trusts.
   (3) Property included in transferor's gross estate.
   (4) Imposition of recapture tax under section 2032A.
   (b) Examples.
26.2642-5 Finality of inclusion ratio.
   (a) Direct skips.
   (b) Other GSTs.
26.2652-1 Transferor defined; other definitions.
   (a) Transferor defined.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Transfers subject to Federal estate or gift tax.
   (3) Special rule for certain QTIP trusts.
   (4) Exercise of certain nongeneral powers of appointment.
   (5) Split-gift transfers.
   (6) Examples.
   (b) Trust defined.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Examples.
   (c) Trustee defined.
   (d) Executor defined.
   (e) Interest in trust.
26.2652-2 Special election for qualified terminable interest
property.
   (a) In general.
   (b) Time and manner of making election.
   (c) Transitional rule.
   (d) Examples.
26.2653-1 Taxation of multiple skips.
   (a) General rule.
   (b) Examples.
26.2654-1 Certain trusts treated as separate trusts.
   (a) Single trust treated as separate trusts.
   (1) Substantially separate and independent shares.
   (2) Multiple transferors with respect to a single trust.
   (3) Severance of a single trust.
   (4) Allocation of exemption.
   (5) Examples.
   (b) Division of a trust included in the gross estate.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Special rule.
   (3) Allocation of exemption.
   (4) Example.
26.2662-1 Generation-skipping transfer tax return requirements.
   (a) In general.
   (b) Form of return.
   (1) Taxable distributions.
   (2) Taxable terminations.
   (3) Direct skip.
   (c) Person liable for tax and required to make return.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Special rule for direct skips occurring at death with
       respect to property held in trust arrangements.
   (3) Limitation on personal liability of trustee.
   (4) Exceptions.
   (d) Time and manner of filing return.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Exceptions.
   (e) Place for filing returns.
   (f) Lien on property.
26.2663-1 Recapture tax under section 2032A.
26.2663-2 Application of chapter 13 to transfers by nonresidents
not citizens of the United States.
   (a) In general.
   (b) Transfers subject to Chapter 13.
   (1) Direct skips.
   (2) Taxable distributions and taxable terminations.
   (c) Trusts funded in part with property subject to Chapter 13
      and in part with property not subject to Chapter 13.
   (1) In general.
   (2) Nontax portion of the trust.
   (3) Special rule with respect to estate tax inclusion period.
   (d) Examples.
   (e) Transitional rule for allocations for transfers made
       before December 27, 1995.
26.2601-1 Effective dates.
     (a) Transfers subject to the generation-skipping transfer
tax--(1) In general.  Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the provisions of chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (Code) apply to any generation-skipping transfer (as
defined in section 2611) made after October 22, 1986.
     (2) Certain transfers treated as if made after October 22,
1986.  Solely for purposes of chapter 13, an inter vivos transfer
is treated as if it were made on October 23, 1986, if it was--
     (i) Subject to chapter 12 (regardless of whether a tax was
actually incurred or paid); and
     (ii) Made after September 25, 1985, but before October 23,
1986.  For purposes of this paragraph, the value of the property
transferred shall be the value of the property on the date the
property was transferred.
     (3) Certain trust events treated as if occurring after
October 22, 1986.  For purposes of chapter 13, if an inter vivos
transfer is made to a trust after September 25, 1985, but before
October 23, 1986, any subsequent distribution from the trust or
termination of an interest in the trust that occurred before
October 23, 1986, is treated as occurring immediately after the
deemed transfer on October 23, 1986.  If more than one
distribution or termination occurs with respect to a trust, the
events are treated as if they occurred on October 23, 1986, in
the same order as they occurred.  See paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(B) of
this section for rules determining the portion of distributions
and terminations subject to tax under chapter 13.  This paragraph
(a)(3) does not apply to transfers to trusts not subject to
chapter 13 by reason of the transition rules in paragraphs (b)(2)
and (3) of this section.  The provisions of this paragraph (a)(3)
do not apply in determining the value of the property under
chapter 13.
     (4) Example.  The following example illustrates the
principle that paragraph (a)(2) of this section is not applicable
to transfers under a revocable trust that became irrevocable by
reason of the transferor's death after September 25, 1985, but
before October 23, 1986:
     Example.  T created a revocable trust on September 30, 1985,
that became irrevocable when T died on October 10, 1986.
Although the trust terminated in favor of a grandchild of T, the
transfer to the grandchild is not treated as occurring on October
23, 1986, pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section because it
is not an inter vivos transfer subject to chapter 12.  The
transfer is not subject to chapter 13 because it is in the nature
of a testamentary transfer that occurred prior to October 23,
1986.
     (b) Exceptions--(1) Irrevocable trusts--(i) In general.  The
provisions of chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping
transfer under a trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) that was
irrevocable on September 25, 1985.  The rule of the preceding
sentence does not apply to a pro rata portion of any generation-
skipping transfer under an irrevocable trust if additions are
made to the trust after September 25, 1985.  See paragraph
(b)(1)(iv) of this section for rules for determining the portion
of the trust that is subject to the provisions of chapter 13.
     (ii) Irrevocable trust defined--(A) In general.  Unless
otherwise provided in either paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) or (C) of
this section, any trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) in
existence on September 25, 1985, is considered an irrevocable
trust.
     (B) Property includible in the gross estate under section
2038.  For purposes of this chapter a trust is not an irrevocable
trust to the extent that, on September 25, 1985, the settlor held
a power with respect to such trust that would have caused the
value of the trust to be included in the settlor's gross estate
for Federal estate tax purposes by reason of section 2038
(without regard to powers relinquished before September 25, 1985)
if the settlor had died on September 25, 1985.  A trust is
considered subject to a power on September 25, 1985, even though
the exercise of the power was subject to the precedent giving of
notice, or even though the exercise could take effect only on the
expiration of a stated period, whether or not on or before
September 25, 1985, notice had been given or the power had been
exercised.  A trust is not considered subject to a power if the
power is, by its terms, exercisable only on the occurrence of an
event or contingency not subject to the settlor's control (other
than the death of the settlor) and if the event or contingency
had not in fact taken place on September 25, 1985.
     (C) Property includible in the gross estate under section
2042.  A policy of insurance on an individual's life that is
treated as a trust under section 2652(b) is not considered an
irrevocable trust to the extent that, on September 25, 1985, the
insured possessed any incident of ownership (as defined in
20.2042-1(c) of this chapter, and without regard to any
incidents of ownership relinquished before September 25, 1985),
that would have caused the value of the trust, (i.e., the
insurance proceeds) to be included in the insured's gross estate
for Federal estate tax purposes by reason of section 2042, if the
insured had died on September 25, 1985.
     (D) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of this paragraph (b)(1):
     Example 1.  Section 2038 applicable.  On September 25,
1985, T, the settlor of a trust that was created before September
25, 1985, held a testamentary power to add new beneficiaries to
the trust.  T held no other powers over any portion of the trust.
The testamentary power held by T would have caused the trust to
be included in T's gross estate under section 2038 if T had died
on September 25, 1985.  Therefore, the trust is not an
irrevocable trust for purposes of this section.
     Example 2.  Section 2038 not applicable when power held by a
person other than settlor.  On September 25, 1985, S, the spouse
of the settlor of a trust in existence on that date, had an
annual right to withdraw a portion of the principal of the trust.
The trust was otherwise irrevocable on that date.  Because the
power was not held by the settlor of the trust, it is not a power
described in section 2038.  Thus, the trust is considered an
irrevocable trust for purposes of this section.
     Example 3.  Section 2038 not applicable.  In 1984, T created
a trust and retained the right to expand the class of
remaindermen to include any of T's afterborn grandchildren.
As of September 25, 1985, all of T's grandchildren were named
remaindermen of the trust.  Since the exercise of T's power was
dependent on there being afterborn grandchildren who were not
members of the class of remaindermen, a contingency that did not
exist on September 25, 1985, the trust is not considered subject
to the power on September 25, 1985, and is an irrevocable trust
for purposes of this section.  The result is not changed even if
grandchildren are born after September 25, 1985, whether or not T
exercises the power to expand the class of remaindermen.
     Example 4.  Section 2042 applicable.  On September 25, 1985,
T purchased an insurance policy on T's own life and designated
child, C, and grandchild, GC, as the beneficiaries.  T retained
the power to obtain from the insurer a loan against the surrender
value of the policy.  T's insurance policy is a trust (as defined
in section 2652(b)) for chapter 13 purposes.  The trust is not
considered an irrevocable trust because, on September 25, 1985, T
possessed an incident of ownership that would have caused the
value of the policy to be included in T's gross estate under
section 2042 if T had died on that date.
     Example 5.  Trust partially irrevocable.  In 1984, T created
a trust naming T's grandchildren as the income and remainder
beneficiaries.  T retained the power to revoke the trust as to
one-half of the principal at any time prior to T's death.  T
retained no other powers over the trust principal.  T did not die
before September 25, 1985, and did not exercise or release the
power before that date.  The half of the trust not subject to T's
power to revoke is an irrevocable trust for purposes of this
section.
     (iii) Trust containing qualified terminable interest
property--(A) In general.  For purposes of chapter 13, a trust
described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section that holds
qualified terminable interest property by reason of an election
under section 2056(b)(7) or section 2523(f) (made either on,
before or after September 25, 1985) is treated in the same manner
as if the decedent spouse or the donor spouse (as the case may
be) had made an election under section 2652(a)(3).  Thus,
transfers from such trusts are not subject to chapter 13, and the
decedent spouse or the donor spouse (as the case may be) is
treated as the transferor of such property.  The rule of this
paragraph (b)(1)(iii) does not apply to that portion of the trust
that is subject to chapter 13 by reason of an addition to the
trust occurring after September 25, 1985.  See 26.2652-2(a) for
rules where an election under section 2652(a)(3) is made.  See
26.2652-2(c) for rules where a portion of a trust is subject to
an election under section 2652(a)(3).
     (B) Examples.   The following examples illustrate the
application of this paragraph (b)(1)(iii):
     Example 1.  QTIP election made after September 25, 1985.  On
March 28, 1985, T established a trust.  The trust instrument
provided that the trustee must distribute all income annually to
T's spouse, S, during S's life.  Upon S's death, the remainder is
to be distributed to GC, the grandchild of T and S.  On April 15,
1986, T elected under section 2523(f) to treat the property in
the trust as qualified terminable interest property.  On December
1, 1987, S died and soon thereafter the trust assets were
distributed to GC.  Because the trust was irrevocable on
September 25, 1985, the transfer to GC is not subject to tax
under chapter 13.  T is treated as the transferor with respect to
the transfer of the trust assets to GC in the same manner as if T
had made an election under section 2652(a)(3) to reverse the
effect of the section 2523(f) election for chapter 13 purposes.
     Example 2.  Section 2652(a)(3) election deemed to have been
made.  Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except the trust
instrument provides that after S's death all income is to be paid
annually to C, the child of T and S.  Upon C's death, the
remainder is to be distributed to GC.  C died on October 1, 1992,
and soon thereafter the trust assets are distributed to GC.
Because the trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, the
termination of C's interest is not subject to chapter 13.
     (iv) Additions to irrevocable trusts--(A) In general.  If an
addition is made after September 25, 1985, to an irrevocable
trust which is excluded from chapter 13 by reason of paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, a pro rata portion of subsequent
distributions from (and terminations of interests in property
held in) the trust is subject to the provisions of chapter 13.
If an addition is made, the trust is thereafter deemed to consist
of two portions, a portion not subject to chapter 13 (the non-
chapter 13 portion) and a portion subject to chapter 13 (the
chapter 13 portion), each with a separate inclusion ratio (as
defined in section 2642(a)).  The non-chapter 13 portion
represents the value of the assets of the trust as it existed on
September 25, 1985.  The applicable fraction (as defined in
section 2642(a)(2)) for the non-chapter 13 portion is deemed to
be 1 and the inclusion ratio for such portion is 0.  The chapter
13 portion of the trust represents the value of all additions
made to the trust after September 25, 1985.  The inclusion ratio
for the chapter 13 portion is determined under section 2642.
This paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(A) requires separate portions of one
trust only for purposes of determining inclusion ratios.  For
purposes of chapter 13, a constructive addition under paragraph
(b)(1)(v) of this section is treated as an addition.  See
paragraph (b)(4) of this section for exceptions to the additions
rule of this paragraph (b)(1)(iv).  See 26.2654-1(a)(2) for
rules treating additions to a trust by an individual other than
the initial transferor as a separate trust for purposes of
chapter 13.
     (B) Terminations of interests in and distributions from
trusts.  Where a termination or distribution described in section
2612 occurs with respect to a trust to which an addition has been
made, the portion of such termination or distribution allocable
to the chapter 13 portion is determined by reference to the
allocation fraction, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C) of
this section.  In the case of a termination described in section
2612(a) with respect to a trust, the portion of such termination
that is subject to chapter 13 is the product of the allocation
fraction and the value of the trust (to the extent of the
terminated interest therein).  In the case of a distribution
described in section 2612(b) from a trust, the portion of such
distribution that is subject to chapter 13 is the product of the
allocation fraction and the value of the property distributed.
     (C) Allocation fraction--(1) In general.  The allocation
fraction allocates appreciation and accumulated income between
the chapter 13 and non-chapter 13 portions of a trust.  The
numerator of the allocation fraction is the amount of the
addition (valued as of the date the addition is made), determined
without regard to whether any part of the transfer is subject to
tax under chapter 11 or chapter 12, but reduced by the amount of
any Federal or state estate or gift tax imposed and subsequently
paid by the recipient trust with respect to the addition.  The
denominator of the allocation fraction is the total value of the
entire trust immediately after the addition.  For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C), the total value of the entire trust
is the fair market value of the property held in trust
(determined under the rules of section 2031), reduced by any
amount attributable to or paid by the trust and attributable to
the transfer to the trust that is similar to an amount that would
be allowable as a deduction under section 2053 if the addition
had occurred at the death of the transferor, and further reduced
by the same amount that the numerator was reduced to reflect
Federal or state estate or gift tax incurred by and subsequently
paid by the recipient trust with respect to the addition.  Where
there is more than one addition to principal after September 25,
1985, the portion of the trust subject to chapter 13 after each
such addition is determined pursuant to a revised fraction.  In
each case, the numerator of the revised fraction is the sum of
the value of the chapter 13 portion of the trust immediately
before the latest addition, and the amount of the latest
addition.  The denominator of the revised fraction is the total
value of the entire trust immediately after the addition.  If the
transfer to the trust is a generation-skipping transfer, the
numerator and denominator are reduced by the amount of the
generation-skipping transfer tax, if any, that is imposed by
chapter 13 on the transfer and actually recovered from the trust.
The allocation fraction is rounded off to five decimal places
(.00001).
     (2) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section.  In each of
the examples, assume that the recipient trust does not pay any
Federal or state transfer tax by reason of the addition.
     Example 1.  Post September 25, 1985, addition to trust.
(i) On August 16, 1980, T established an irrevocable trust.
Under the trust instrument, the trustee is required to distribute
the entire income annually to T's child, C, for life, then to T's
grandchild, GC, for life.  Upon GC's death, the remainder is to
be paid to GC's issue.  On October 1, 1986, when the total value
of the entire trust is $400,000, T transfers $100,000 to the
trust.  The allocation fraction is computed as follows:
Value of addition               $100,000
   =      =  .2
Total value of trust       $400,000 + $100,000
     (ii) Thus, immediately after the transfer, 20 percent of the
value of future generation-skipping transfers under the trust
will be subject to chapter 13.
     Example 2.  Effect of expenses.  Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except immediately prior to the transfer on October 1,
1986, the fair market value of the individual assets in the trust
totaled $400,000.  Also, assume that the trust had accrued and
unpaid debts, expenses, and taxes totaling $300,000.  Assume
further that the entire $300,000 represented amounts that would
be deductible under section 2053 if the trust were includible in
the transferor's gross estate.  The numerator of the allocation
fraction is $100,000 and the denominator of the allocation
fraction is $200,000 (($400,000 - $300,000) + $100,000).  Thus,
the allocation fraction is .5 ($100,000/$200,000) and 50 percent
of the value of future generation-skipping transfers will be
subject to chapter 13.
     Example 3.  Multiple additions.  (i) Assume the same facts
as in Example 1, except on January 30, 1988, when the total value
of the entire trust is $600,000, T transfers an additional
$40,000 to the trust.  Before the transfer, the value of the
portion of the trust that was attributable to the prior addition
was $120,000 ($600,000 x .2).  The new allocation fraction is
computed as follows:
Total value of additions
   =
  Total value of trust
$120,000 + $40,000         $160,000
   =        =  .25
$600,000 + $40,000         $640,000
     (ii) Thus, immediately after the transfer, 25 percent of the
value of future generation-skipping transfers under the trust
will be subject to chapter 13.
     Example 4.  Allocation fraction at time of generation-
skipping transfer.  Assume the same facts as in Example 3, except
on March 1, 1989, when the value of the trust is $800,000, C
dies.  A generation-skipping transfer occurs at C's death because
of the termination of C's life estate.  Therefore, $200,000
($800,000 x .25) is subject to tax under chapter 13.
     (v) Constructive additions--(A) Powers of Appointment.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B) of this section,
where any portion of a trust remains in the trust after the post-
September 25, 1985, release, exercise, or lapse of a power of
appointment over that portion of the trust, and the release,
exercise, or lapse is treated to any extent as a taxable transfer
under chapter 11 or chapter 12, the value of the entire portion
of the trust subject to the power that was released, exercised,
or lapsed is treated as if that portion had been withdrawn and
immediately retransferred to the trust at the time of the
release, exercise, or lapse.  The creator of the power will be
considered the transferor of the addition except to the extent
that the release, exercise, or lapse of the power is treated as a
taxable transfer under chapter 11 or chapter 12.  See 26.2652-1
for rules for determining the identity of the transferor of
property for purposes of chapter 13.
     (B) Special rule for certain powers of appointment.  The
release, exercise, or lapse of a power of appointment (other than
a general power of appointment as defined in 2041(b)) is not
treated as an addition to a trust if--
     (1) Such power of appointment was created in an
irrevocable trust that is not subject to chapter 13 under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
     (2) In the case of an exercise, the power of appointment is
not exercised in a manner that may postpone or suspend the
vesting, absolute ownership or power of alienation of an interest
in property for a period, measured from the date of creation of
the trust, extending beyond any life in being at the date of
creation of the trust plus a period of 21 years plus, if
necessary, a reasonable period of gestation (the perpetuities
period).  For purposes of this paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B)(2), the
exercise of a power of appointment that validly postpones or
suspends the vesting, absolute ownership or power of alienation
of an interest in property for a term of years that will not
exceed 90 years (measured from the date of creation of the trust)
will not be considered an exercise that postpones or suspends
vesting, absolute ownership or the power of alienation beyond the
perpetuities period.  If a power is exercised by creating another
power, it is deemed to be exercised to whatever extent the second
power may be exercised.
     (C) Constructive addition if liability is not paid out of
trust principal.  Where a trust described in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section is relieved of any liability properly payable out of
the assets of such trust, the person or entity who actually
satisfies the liability is considered to have made a constructive
addition to the trust in an amount equal to the liability.  The
constructive addition occurs when the trust is relieved of
liability (e.g., when the right of recovery is no longer
enforceable).  But see 26.2652-1(a)(3) for rules involving the
application of section 2207A in the case of an election under
section 2652(a)(3).
   (D) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of this paragraph (b)(1)(v):
   Example 1.  Lapse of a power of appointment.  On June 19,
1980, T established an irrevocable trust with a corpus of
$500,000.  The trust instrument provides that the trustee shall
distribute the entire income from the trust annually to T's
spouse, S, during S's life.  At S's death, the remainder is to be
distributed to T and S's grandchild, GC.  T also gave S a general
power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets.  On
December 21, 1989, when the value of the trust corpus is
$1,500,000, S died without having exercised the general power of
appointment.  The value of one-half of the trust corpus, $750,000
($1,500,000 x .5) is included in S's gross estate under section
2041(a) and is subject to tax under Chapter 11.  Because the
value of one-half of the trust corpus is subject to tax under
Chapter 11 with respect to S's estate, S is treated as the
transferor of that property for purposes of Chapter 13 (see
section 2652(a)(1)(A)).  For purposes of the generation-skipping
transfer tax, the lapse of S's power of appointment is treated as
if $750,000 ($1,500,000 x .5) had been distributed to S and then
transferred back to the trust.  Thus, S is considered to have
added $750,000 ($1,500,000 x .5) to the trust at the date of S's
death.  Because this constructive addition occurred after
September 25, 1985, 50 percent of the corpus of the trust became
subject to Chapter 13 at S's death.
     Example 2.  Multiple actual additions.  On June 19, 1980, T
established an irrevocable trust with a principal of $500,000.
The trust instrument provides that the trustee shall distribute
the entire income from the trust annually to T's spouse, S,
during S's life.  At S's death, the remainder is to be
distributed to GC, the grandchild of T and S.  On October 1,
1985, when the trust assets were valued at $800,000, T added
$200,000 to the trust.  After the transfer on October 1, 1985,
the allocation fraction was .2 ($200,000/$1,000,000).  On
December 21, 1989, when the value of the trust principal is
$1,000,000, T adds $1,000,000 to the trust.  After this addition,
the new allocation fraction is 0.6 ($1,200,000/$2,000,000).  The
numerator of the fraction is the value of that portion of trust
assets that were subject to chapter 13 immediately prior to the
addition (by reason of the first addition), $200,000 (.2 x
$1,000,000), plus the value of the second transfer, $1,000,000,
which equals $1,200,000.  The denominator of the fraction,
$2,000,000, is the total value of the trust assets immediately
after the second transfer.  Thus, 60 percent of the principal of
the trust becomes subject to chapter 13.
     Example 3.  Entire portion of trust subject to lapsed power
is treated as an addition.  On September 25, 1985, B possessed a
general power of appointment over the assets of an irrevocable
trust that had been created by T in 1980.  Under the terms of the
trust, B's power lapsed on July 20, 1987.  For Federal gift tax
purposes, B is treated as making a gift of ninety-five percent
(100% - 5%) of the value of the principal (see section 2514).
However, because the entire trust was subject to the power of
appointment, 100 percent (that portion of the trust subject to
the power) of the assets of the trust are treated as a
constructive addition.  Thus, the entire amount of all
generation-skipping transfers occurring pursuant to the trust
instrument after July 20, 1987, are subject to chapter 13.
     Example 4.  Exercise of power of appointment in favor of
another trust.  On March 1, 1985, T established an irrevocable
trust as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section.  Under
the terms of the trust instrument, the trustee is required to
distribute the entire income annually to T's child, C, for life,
then to T's grandchild, GC, for life.  GC has the power to
appoint any or all of the trust assets to Trust 2 which is an
irrevocable trust (as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this
section) that was established on August 1, 1985.  The terms of
Trust 2's governing instrument provide that the trustee shall pay
income to T's great grandchild, GGC, for life.  Upon GGC's death,
the remainder is to be paid to GGC's issue.  GGC was alive on
March 1, 1985, when Trust 1 was created.  C died on April 1,
1986.  On July 1, 1987, GC exercised the power of appointment.
The exercise of GC's power does not subject future transfers from
Trust 2 to tax under chapter 13 because the exercise of the power
in favor of Trust 2 does not suspend the vesting, absolute
ownership, or power of alienation of an interest in property for
a period, measured from the date of creation of Trust 1,
extending beyond the life of GGC (a beneficiary under Trust 2 who
was in being at the date of creation of Trust 1) plus a period of
21 years.  The result would be the same if Trust 2 had been
created after the effective date of chapter 13.
     Example 5.  Exercise of power of appointment in favor of
another trust.  Assume the same facts as in Example 4, except
that GGC was born on March 28, 1986.  The valid exercise of GC's
power in favor of Trust 2 causes the principal of Trust 1 to be
subject to chapter 13, because GGC was not born until after the
creation of Trust 1.  Thus, such exercise may suspend the
vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of an
interest in the trust principal for a period, measured from the
date of creation of Trust 1, extending beyond the life of GGC (a
beneficiary under Trust 2 who was not a life in being at the date
of creation of Trust 1).
   Example 6.  Extension for the longer of two periods.  Prior to
the effective date of chapter 13, GP established an irrevocable
trust under which the trust income was to be paid to GP's child,
C, for life.  C was given a testamentary power to appoint the
remainder in further trust for the benefit of C's issue.  In
default of C's exercise of the power, the remainder was to pass
to charity.  C died on February 3, 1995, survived by a child who
was alive when GP established the trust.  C exercised the power
in a manner that validly extends the trust in favor of C's issue
until the later of May 15, 2064 (80 years from the date the trust
was created), or the death of C's child plus 21 years.  C's
exercise of the power is a constructive addition to the trust
because the exercise may extend the trust for a period longer
than the permissible periods of either the life of C's child (a
life in being at the creation of the trust) plus 21 years or a
term not more than 90 years measured from the creation of the
trust.  On the other hand, if C's exercise of the power could
extend the trust based only on the life of C's child plus 21 years
or only for a term of 80 years from the creation of the trust (but
not the later of the two periods) then the exercise of the power
would not have been a constructive addition to the trust.
   Example 7.  Extension for the longer of two periods.  The facts
are the same as in Example 6 except local law provides that the
effect of C's exercise is to extend the term of the trust until
May 15, 2064, whether or not C's child predeceases that date by
more than 21 years.  C's exercise is not a constructive addition
to the trust because C exercised the power in a manner that cannot
postpone or suspend vesting, absolute ownership, or power of
alienation for a term of years that will exceed 90 years.  The
result would be the same if the effect of C's exercise is either
to extend the term of the trust until 21 years after the death of
C's child or to extend the term of the trust until the first to
occur of May 15, 2064 or 21 years after the death of C's child.
     (vi) Appreciation and income.  Except to the extent that the
provisions of paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of this section
allocate subsequent appreciation and accumulated income between
the original trust and additions thereto, appreciation in the
value of the trust and undistributed income added thereto are not
considered an addition to the principal of a trust.
     (2) Transition rule for wills or revocable trusts executed
before October 22, 1986--(i) In general.  The provisions of
chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping transfer under
a will or revocable trust executed before October 22, 1986,
provided that--
     (A) The document in existence on October 21, 1986, is not
amended at any time after October 21, 1986, in any respect which
results in the creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a
generation-skipping transfer;
     (B) In the case of a revocable trust, no addition is made to
the revocable trust after October 21, 1986, that results in the
creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a
generation-skipping transfer; and
     (C) The decedent dies before January 1, 1987.
     (ii) Revocable trust defined.  For purposes of this section,
the term revocable trust means any trust (as defined in section
2652(b)) except to the extent that, on October 22, 1986, the
trust--
     (A) Was an irrevocable trust described in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section; or
     (B) Would have been an irrevocable trust described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section had it not been created or
become irrevocable after September 25, 1985, and before October
22, 1986.
     (iii) Will or revocable trust containing qualified
terminable interest property.  The rules contained in paragraph
(b)(1)(iii) of this section apply to any will or revocable trust
within the scope of the transition rule of this paragraph (b)(2).
     (iv) Amendments to will or revocable trust.  For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(2), an amendment to a will or a revocable
trust in existence on October 21, 1986, is not considered to
result in the creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a
generation-skipping transfer where the amendment is--
     (A) Basically administrative or clarifying in nature and
only incidentally increases the amount transferred; or
     (B) Designed to ensure that an existing bequest or
transfer qualifies for the applicable marital or charitable
deduction for estate, gift, or generation-skipping transfer tax
purposes and only incidentally increases the amount transferred
to a skip person or to a generation-skipping trust.
     (v) Creation of, or increase in the amount of, a GST.  In
determining whether a particular amendment to a will or revocable
trust creates, or increases the amount of, a generation-skipping
transfer for purposes of this paragraph (b)(2), the effect of the
instrument(s) in existence on October 21, 1986, is measured
against the effect of the instrument(s) in existence on the date
of death of the decedent or on the date of any prior generation-
skipping transfer.  If the effect of an amendment cannot be
immediately determined, it is deemed to create, or increase the
amount of, a generation-skipping transfer until a determination
can be made.
     (vi) Additions to revocable trusts.  Any addition made after
October 21, 1986, but before the death of the settlor, to a
revocable trust subjects all subsequent generation-skipping
transfers under the trust to the provisions of chapter 13.  Any
addition made to a revocable trust after the death of the settlor
(if the settlor dies before January 1, 1987) is treated as an
addition to an irrevocable trust.  See paragraph (b)(1)(v) of
this section for rules involving constructive additions to
trusts.  See paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B) of this section for rules
providing that certain transfers to trusts are not treated as
additions for purposes of this section.
     (vii) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section:
     (A) Facts applicable to Examples 1 through 5.  In each of
Examples 1 through 5 assume that T executed a will prior to
October 22, 1986, and that T dies on December 31, 1986.
     Example 1.  Administrative change.  On November 1, 1986, T
executes a codicil to T's will removing one of the co-executors
named in the will.  Although the codicil may have the effect of
lowering administrative costs and thus increasing the amount
transferred, it is considered administrative in nature and thus
does not cause generation-skipping transfers under the will to be
subject to chapter 13.
     Example 2.  Effect of amendment not immediately
determinable.  On November 1, 1986, T executes a codicil to T's
will revoking a bequest of $100,000 to C, a non-skip person (as
defined under section 2613(b)) and causing that amount to be
added to a residuary trust held for a skip person.  The amendment
is deemed to increase the amount of a generation-skipping
transfer and prevents any transfers under the will from
qualifying under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.  If,
however, C dies before T and under local law the property would
have been added to the residue in any event because the bequest
would have lapsed, the codicil is not considered an amendment
that increases the amount of a generation-skipping transfer.
     Example 3.  Refund of tax paid because of amendment.  T's
will provided that an amount equal to the maximum allowable
marital deduction would pass to T's spouse with the residue of
the estate passing to a trust established for the benefit of skip
persons.  On October 23, 1986, the will is amended to provide
that the marital share passing to T's spouse shall be the lesser
of the maximum allowable marital deduction or the minimum amount
that will result in no estate tax liability for T's estate.  The
amendment may increase the amount of a generation-skipping
transfer.  Therefore, any generation-skipping transfers under the
will are subject to tax under chapter 13.  If it becomes apparent
that the amendment does not increase the amount of a generation-
skipping transfer, a claim for refund may be filed with respect
to any generation-skipping transfer tax that was paid within the
period set forth in section 6511.  For example, it would become
apparent that the amendment did not result in an increase in the
residue if it is subsequently determined that the maximum marital
deduction and the minimum amount that will result in no estate
tax liability are equal in amount.
     Example 4.  An amendment that increases a generation-
skipping transfer causes complete loss of exempt status.  T's
will provided for the creation of two trusts for the benefit of
skip persons.  On November 1, 1986, T executed a codicil to the
will specifically increasing the amount of a generation-skipping
transfer under the will.  All transfers made pursuant to the will
or either of the trusts created thereunder are precluded from
qualifying under the transition rule of paragraph (b)(2)(i) of
this section and are subject to tax under chapter 13.
     Example 5.  Corrective action effective.  Assume that T in
Example 4 later executes a second codicil deleting the increase
to the generation-skipping transfer.  Because the provision
increasing a generation-skipping transfer does not become
effective, it is not considered an amendment to a will in
existence on October 22, 1986.
     (B) Facts applicable to Examples 6 through 9.  T created a
trust on September 30, 1985, in which T retained the power to
revoke the transfer at any time prior to T's death.  The trust
provided that, upon the death of T, the income was to be paid to
T's spouse, W, for life and then to A, B, and C, the children of
T's sibling, S, in equal shares for life, with one-third of the
principal to be distributed per stirpes to each child's surviving
issue upon the death of the child.  The trustee has the power to
make discretionary distributions of trust principal to T's
sibling, S.
     Example 6.  Amendment that affects only a person who is not
a skip person.  A became disabled, and T modified the trust on
December 1, 1986, to increase A's share of the income.  Since the
amendment does not result in the creation of, or increase in the
amount of, a generation-skipping transfer, transfers pursuant to
the trust are not subject to chapter 13.
     Example 7.  Amendment increasing skip person's share.
Assume that A, B, and C are the grandchildren of S rather than
the children (and thus are skip persons as defined in section
2613).  T's amendment of the trust increasing A's share of the
income subjects the trust to the provisions of chapter 13 because
the amendment increases the amount of the generation-skipping
transfers to be made to A.
     Example 8.  Amendment that adds a skip person.  Assume that
T amends the trust to add T's grandchild, D, as an income
beneficiary.  The trust will be subject to the provisions of
chapter 13 because the amendment creates a generation-skipping
transfer.
     Example 9.  Refund of tax paid during interim period when
effect of amendment is not determinable.  Assume that T amends
the trust to provide that the issue of S are to take a one-fourth
share of the principal per stirpes upon S's death.  Because the
distribution to be made upon S's death may involve skip persons,
the amendment is considered an amendment that creates or
increases the amount of a generation-skipping transfer until a
determination can be made.  Accordingly, any distributions from
(or terminations of interests in) such trust are subject to
chapter 13 until it is determined that no skip person has been
added to the trust.  At that time, a claim for refund may be
filed within the period set forth in section 6511 with respect to
any generation-skipping transfer tax that was paid.
     (3) Transition rule in the case of mental incompetency--(i)
In general.  If an individual was under a mental disability to
change the disposition of his or her property continuously from
October 22, 1986, until the date of his or her death, the
provisions of chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping
transfer--
     (A) Under a trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) to the
extent such trust consists of property, or the proceeds of
property, the value of which was included in the gross estate of
the individual (other than property transferred by or on behalf
of the individual during the individual's life after October 22,
1986); or
     (B) Which is a direct skip (other than a direct skip from a
trust) that occurs by reason of the death of the individual.
     (ii) Mental disability defined.  For purposes of this
paragraph (b)(2), the term mental disability means mental
incompetence to execute an instrument governing the disposition
of the individual's property, whether or not there was an
adjudication of incompetence and regardless of whether there has
been an appointment of a guardian, fiduciary, or other person
charged with either the care of the individual or the care of the
individual's property.
     (iii)(A) Decedent who has not been adjudged mentally
incompetent.  If there has not been a court adjudication that the
decedent was mentally incompetent on or before October 22, 1986,
the executor must file, with Form 706, either--
    (1) A certification from a qualified physician stating that
the decedent was--
    (i) mentally incompetent at all times on and after October
22, 1986; and
    (ii) did not regain competence to modify or revoke the terms
of the trust or will prior to his or her death; or
    (2) Sufficient other evidence demonstrating that the decedent
was mentally incompetent at all times on and after October 22,
1986, as well as a statement explaining why no certification is
available from a physician; and
    (3) Any judgement or decree relating to the decedent's
incompetency that was made after October 22, 1986.
    (B) Such items in paragraphs (b)(3)(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of
this section will be considered relevant, but not determinative,
in establishing the decedent's state of competency.
     (iv) Decedent who has been adjudged mentally incompetent.
If the decedent has been adjudged mentally incompetent on or
before October 22, 1986, a copy of the judgment or decree, and
any modification thereof, must be filed with the Form 706.
     (v) Rule applies even if another person has power to change
trust terms.  In the case of a transfer from a trust, this
paragraph (b)(3) applies even though a person charged with the
care of the decedent or the decedent's property has the power to
revoke or modify the terms of the trust, provided that the power
is not exercised after October 22, 1986, in a manner that
creates, or increases the amount of, a generation-skipping
transfer.  See paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section for rules
concerning amendments that create or increase the amount of a
generation-skipping transfer.
     (vi) Example.  The following example illustrates the
application of paragraph (b)(3)(v) of this section:
     Example.  T was mentally incompetent on October 22, 1986,
and remained so until death in 1993.  Prior to becoming
incompetent, T created a revocable generation-skipping trust that
was includible in T's gross estate.  Prior to October 22, 1986,
the appropriate court issued an order under which P, who was
thereby charged with the care of T's property, had the power to
modify or revoke the revocable trust.  Although P exercised the
power after October 22, 1986, and while T was incompetent, the
power was not exercised in a manner that created, or increased
the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer.  Thus, the
existence and exercise of P's power did not cause the trust to
lose its exempt status under paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
The result would be the same if the court order was issued after
October 22, 1986.
     (4) Exceptions to additions rule--(i) In general.  Any
addition to a trust made pursuant to an instrument or arrangement
covered by the transition rules in paragraph (b)(1), (2) or (3)
of this section is not treated as an addition for purposes of
this section.  Moreover, any property transferred inter vivos to
a trust is not treated as an addition if the same property would
have been added to the trust pursuant to an instrument covered by
the transition rules in paragraph (b)(2) or (3) of this section.
     (ii) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section:
     Example 1.  Addition pursuant to terms of exempt instrument.
On December 31, 1980, T created an irrevocable trust having a
principal of $100,000.  Under the terms of the trust, the
principal was to be held for the benefit of T's grandchild, GC.
Pursuant to the terms of T's will, a document entitled to relief
under the transition rule of paragraph (b)(2) of this section,
the residue of the estate was paid to the trust.  Because the
addition to the trust was paid pursuant to the terms of an
instrument (T's will) that is not subject to the provisions of
chapter 13 because of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the
payment to the trust is not considered an addition to the
principal of the trust.  Thus, distributions to or for the
benefit of GC, are not subject to the provisions of chapter 13.
     Example 2.  Property transferred inter vivos that would have
been transferred to the same trust by the transferor's will.  T
is the grantor of a trust that was irrevocable on September 25,
1985.  T's will, which was executed before October 22, 1986, and
not amended thereafter, provides that, upon T's death, the entire
estate will pour over into T's trust.  On October 1, 1985, T
transfers $100,000 to the trust.  While T's will otherwise
qualifies for relief under the transition rule in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, the transition rule is not applicable
unless T dies prior to January 1, 1987.  Thus, if T dies after
December 31, 1986, the transfer is treated as an addition to the
trust for purposes of any distribution made from the trust after
the transfer to the trust on October 1, 1985.  If T dies before
January 1, 1987, the entire trust (as well as any distributions
from or terminations of interests in the trust prior to T's
death) is exempt, under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, from
chapter 13 because the $100,000 would have been added to the
trust under a will that would have qualified under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section.  In either case, for any generation-
skipping transfers made after the transfer to the trust on
October 1, 1985, but before T's death, the $100,000 is treated as
an addition to the trust and a proportionate amount of the trust
is subject to chapter 13.
     Example 3.  Pour over to a revocable trust.  T and S are the
settlors of separate revocable trusts with equal values.  Both
trusts were established for the benefit of skip persons (as
defined in section 2613).  S dies on December 1, 1985, and under
the provisions of S's trust, the principal pours over into T's
trust.  If T dies before January 1, 1987, the entire trust is
excluded under paragraph (b)(2) of this section from the
operation of chapter 13.  If T dies after December 31, 1986, the
entire trust is subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax
provisions because T's trust is not a trust described in
paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.  In the latter case, the
fact that S died before January 1, 1987, is irrelevant because
the principal of S's trust was added to a trust that never
qualified under the transition rules of paragraph (b)(1) or (2)
of this section.
     Example 4.  Pour over to exempt trust.  Assume the same
facts as in Example 3, except upon the death of S on December 1,
1985, S's trust continues as an irrevocable trust and that the
principal of T's trust is to be paid over upon T's death to S's
trust.  Again, if T dies before January 1, 1987, S's entire trust
falls within the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
However, if T dies after December 31, 1986, the pour-over is
considered an addition to the trust.  Therefore, S's trust is not
a trust excluded under paragraph (b)(2) of this section because
an addition is made to the trust.
     Example 5.  Lapse of a general power of appointment.  S, the
spouse of the settlor of an irrevocable trust that was created in
1980, had, on September 25, 1985, a general power of appointment
over the trust assets.  The trust provides that should S fail to
exercise the power of appointment the property is to remain in
the trust.  On October 21, 1986, S executed a will under which S
failed to exercise the power of appointment.  If S dies before
January 1, 1987, without having exercised the power in a manner
which results in the creation of, or increase in the amount of, a
generation-skipping transfer (or amended the will in a manner
that results in the creation of, or increase in the amount of, a
generation-skipping transfer), transfers pursuant to the trust or
the will are not subject to chapter 13 because the trust is an
irrevocable trust and the will qualifies under paragraph (b)(2)
of this section.
     Example 6.  Lapse of general power of appointment held by
intestate decedent.  Assume the same facts as in Example 5,
except on October 22, 1986, S did not have a will and that S dies
after that date.  Upon S's death, or upon the prior exercise or
release of the power, the value of the entire trust is treated as
having been distributed to S, and S is treated as having made an
addition to the trust in the amount of the entire principal.  Any
distribution or termination pursuant to the trust occurring after
S's death is subject to chapter 13.  It is immaterial whether S's
death occurs before January 1, 1987, since paragraph (b)(2) of
this section is only applicable where a will or revocable trust
was executed before October 22, 1986.
   (c) Additional effective dates.  Except as otherwise provided,
the regulations under 26.2611-1, 26.2612-1, 26.2613-1,
26.2632-1, 26.2641-1, 26.2642-1, 26.2642-2, 26.2642-3, 26.2642-4,
26.2642-5, 26.2652-1, 26.2652-2, 26.2653-1, 26.2654-1, 26.2663-1,
and 26.2663-2 are effective with respect to generation-skipping
transfers as defined in 26.2611-1 made on or after December 27,
1995.  However, taxpayers may, at their option, rely on these
regulations in the case of generation-skipping transfers made,
and trusts that became irrevocable, after December 23, 1992, and
before December 27, 1995.
26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined.
   A generation-skipping transfer (GST) is an event that is
either a direct skip, a taxable distribution, or a taxable
termination.  See 26.2612-1 for the definition of these terms.
The determination as to whether an event is a GST is made by
reference to the most recent transfer subject to the estate or
gift tax.  See 26.2652-1(a)(2) for determining whether a
transfer is subject to Federal estate or gift tax.
26.2612-1  Definitions.
   (a) Direct skip--(1) In general.  A direct skip is a transfer
to a skip person that is subject to Federal estate or gift tax.
If property is transferred to a trust, the transfer is a direct
skip only if the trust is a skip person.  Only one direct skip
occurs when a single transfer of property skips two or more
generations.  See paragraph (d) of this section for the
definition of skip person.  See 26.2652-1(b) for the definition
of trust.  See 26.2632-1(c)(4) for the time that a direct skip
occurs if the transferred property is subject to an estate tax
inclusion period.
   (2) Special rule for certain lineal descendants--(i) In
general.  Solely for the purpose of determining whether a
transfer to or for the benefit of a lineal descendant of the
transferor, the transferor's spouse, or a former spouse of the
transferor is a direct skip, the generation assignment of the
descendant is determined by disregarding the generation of a
predeceased individual who was both an ancestor of the descendant
and a lineal descendant of the transferor, the transferor's
spouse, or a former spouse of the transferor (a predeceased
child).  If a transfer to a trust would be a direct skip but for
this paragraph, any generation assignment determined under this
paragraph continues to apply in determining whether any
subsequent distribution from (or termination of an interest in)
the portion of the trust attributable to that transfer is a GST.
A living descendant who dies no later than 90 days after the
subject transfer is treated as having predeceased the transferor
to the extent that either the governing instrument or applicable
local law provides that such individual shall be treated as
predeceasing the transferor.  Except as provided in this
paragraph (a)(2), a living descendant is not treated as a
predeceased child solely by reason of applicable local law; e.g.,
an individual is not treated as a predeceased child solely
because state law treats an individual executing a disclaimer as
having predeceased the transferor of the disclaimed property.
See 26.2652-1(a)(1) for the definition of transferor.  See
paragraph (e) of this section for the definition of interest in
trust.
   (ii) Special rule.  If a transferor makes an addition to an
existing trust after the death of an individual described in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section (so that the lineal
descendant would be assigned to a highter generation by reason of
that death), the additional property is treated as being held in
a separate trust for purposes of chapter 13 and the provisions of
26.2654-1(a)(2) apply as if the portions of the single trust had
separate transferors.  Subsequent additions are treated as
additions to the appropriate portion of the single trust.
   (b) Taxable termination--(1) In general.  Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (b), a taxable termination is a
termination (occurring for any reason) of an interest in trust
unless--
   (i) A transfer subject to Federal estate or gift tax occurs
with respect to the property held in the trust at the time of the
termination;
   (ii) Immediately after the termination, a person who is not a
skip person has an interest in the trust; or
   (iii) At no time after the termination may a distribution,
other than a distribution the probability of which occurring is
so remote as to be negligible (including a distribution at the
termination of the trust) be made from the trust to a skip
person.  For this purpose, the probability that a distribution
will occur is so remote as to be negligible only if it can be
ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5
percent probability that the distribution will occur.
   (2) Partial termination.  If a distribution of a portion of
trust property is made to a skip person by reason of a
termination occurring on the death of a lineal descendant of the
transferor, the termination is a taxable termination with respect
to the distributed property.
   (3) Simultaneous terminations.  A simultaneous termination of
two or more interests creates only one taxable termination.
   (c) Taxable distribution--(1) In general.  A taxable
distribution is a distribution of income or principal from a
trust to a skip person unless the distribution is a taxable
termination or a direct skip.  If any portion of GST tax
(including penalties and interest thereon) imposed on a
distributee is paid from the distributing trust, the payment is
an additional taxable distribution to the distributee.  For
purposes of chapter 13, the additional distribution is treated as
having been made on the last day of the calendar year in which
the original taxable distribution is made.  If Federal estate or
gift tax is imposed on any individual with respect to an interest
in property held by a trust, the interest in property is treated
as having been distributed to the individual to the extent that
the value of the interest is subject to Federal estate or gift
tax.  See 26.2652-1(a)(6) Example 5, regarding the treatment of
the lapse of a power of appointment as a transfer to a trust.
   (2) Look-through rule not to apply.  Solely for purposes of
determining whether any transfer from a trust to another trust is
a taxable distribution, the rules of section 2651(e)(2) do not
apply.  If the transferring trust and the recipient trust have
the same transferor, see 26.2642-4(a)(1) and (2) for rules for
recomputing the applicable fraction of the recipient trust.
   (d) Skip person.  A skip person is--
   (1) An individual assigned to a generation more than one
generation below that of the transferor (determined under the
rules of section 2651); or
   (2) A trust if--
   (i) All interests in the trust are held by skip persons; or
          (ii) No person holds an interest in the trust and no
distributions, other than a distribution the probability of which
occurring is so remote as to be negligible (including
distributions at the termination of the trust), may be made after
the transfer to a person other than a skip person.  For this
purpose, the probability that a distribution will occur is so
remote as to be negligible only if it can be ascertained by
actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent
probability that the distribution will occur.
   (e) Interest in trust--(1) In general.  An interest in trust
is an interest in property held in trust as defined in section
2652(c) and these regulations.  An interest in trust exists if a
person--
   (i) Has a present right to receive trust principal or income;
   (ii) Is a permissible current recipient of trust principal or
income and is not described in section 2055(a); or
   (iii) Is described in section 2055(a) and the trust is a
charitable remainder annuity trust or unitrust (as defined in
section 664(d)) or a pooled income fund (as defined in section
642(c)(5)).
   (2) Exceptions--(i) Support obligations.  In general, an
individual has a present right to receive trust income or
principal if trust income or principal may be used to satisfy the
individual's support obligations.  However, an individual does
not have an interest in a trust merely because a support
obligation of that individual may be satisfied by a distribution
that is either within the discretion of a fiduciary or pursuant
to provisions of local law substantially equivalent to the
Uniform Gifts (Transfers) to Minors Act.
  (ii) Certain interests disregarded.  An interest which is used
primarily to postpone or avoid the GST tax is disregarded for
purposes of chapter 13.  An interest is considered as used
primarily to postpone or avoid the GST tax if a significant
purpose for the creation of the interest is to postpone or avoid
the tax.
   (3) Disclaimers.  An interest does not exist to the extent it
is disclaimed pursuant to a disclaimer that constitutes a
qualified disclaimer under section 2518.
   (f) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section.  Unless stated otherwise,
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, which assigns descendants to a
higher generation when there is a predeceased ancestor, does not
apply.
   Example 1.  Direct skip.  T gratuitously conveys Blackacre to
T's grandchild.  Because the transfer is a transfer to a skip
person of property subject to Federal gift tax, it is a direct
skip.
   Example 2.  Direct skip of more than one generation.  T
gratuitously conveys Blackacre to T's great-grandchild.  The
transfer is a direct skip.  Only one GST tax is imposed on the
direct skip although two generations are skipped by the transfer.
   Example 3.  Withdrawal power in trust.  T transfers $50,000 to
a new trust providing that trust income is to be paid to T's
child, C, for life and, on C's death, the trust principal is to
be paid to T's descendants.  Under the terms of the trust, T
grants four grandchildren the right to withdraw $10,000 from the
trust for a 60 day period following the transfer.  Since C, who
is not a skip person, has an interest in the trust, the trust is
not a skip person.  T's transfer to the trust is not a direct
skip.
   Example 4.  Taxable termination.  T establishes an irrevocable
trust under which the income is to be paid to T's child, C, for
life.  On the death of C, the trust principal is to be paid to
T's grandchild, GC.  Since C has an interest in the trust, the
trust is not a skip person and the transfer to the trust is not a
direct skip.  If C dies survived by GC, a taxable termination
occurs at C's death because C's interest in the trust terminates
and thereafter the trust property is held by a skip person who
occupies a lower generation than C.
   Example 5.  Direct skip of property held in trust.  T
establishes a testamentary trust under which the income is to be
paid to T's surviving spouse, S, for life and the remainder is to
be paid to a grandchild of T and S.  T's executor elects to treat
the trust as qualified terminable interest property under section
2056(b)(7).  The transfer to the trust is not a direct skip
because S, a person who is not a skip person, holds a present
right to receive income from the trust.  Upon S's death, the
trust property is included in S's gross estate under section 2044
and passes directly to a skip person.  The GST occurring at that
time is a direct skip because it is a transfer subject to chapter
11.  The fact that the interest created by T is terminated at S's
death is immaterial because S becomes the transferor at the time
of the transfer subject to chapter 11.
   Example 6.  Predeceased ancestor exception.  T establishes an
irrevocable trust providing that trust income is to be paid to
T's grandchild, GC, for 5 years.  At the end of the 5-year
period, the trust is to terminate and the principal is to be
distributed to GC.  T's child, C, a parent of GC, is deceased at
the time T establishes the trust.  Therefore, GC is treated as a
child of T rather than as a grandchild.  As a result, GC is not a
skip person, and the initial transfer to the trust is not a
direct skip.  Similarly, distributions to GC during the term of
the trust and at the termination of the trust will not be GSTs.
   Example 7.  Predeceased ancestor exception not applicable.
The facts are the same as in Example 6, except the trust income
is to be paid to T's spouse, S, during the first two years of the
trust.  Since S has an interest in the trust, the trust is not a
skip person and the transfer by T is not a direct skip.  Since
the transfer is not a direct skip, the predeceased ancestor rule
does not apply and GC is not treated as the child of T.  A
taxable termination occurs at the expiration of S's interest.
   Example 8.  Taxable termination.  T establishes an irrevocable
trust for the benefit of T's child, C, T's grandchild, GC, and
T's great-grandchild, GGC.  Under the terms of the trust, income
and principal may be distributed to any or all of the living
beneficiaries at the discretion of the trustee.  Upon the death
of the second beneficiary to die, the trust principal is to be
paid to the survivor.  C dies first.  A taxable termination
occurs at that time because, immediately after C's interest
terminates, all interests in the trust are held by skip persons
(GC and GGC).
   Example 9.  Taxable termination resulting from distribution.
The facts are the same as in Example 8, except twenty years after
C's death the trustee exercises its discretionary power and
distributes the entire principal to GGC.  The distribution
results in a taxable termination because GC's interest in the
trust terminates as a result of the distribution of the entire
trust property to GGC, a skip person.  The result would be the
same if the trustee retained sufficient funds to pay the GST tax
due by reason of the taxable termination, as well as any expenses
of winding up the trust.
   Example 10.  Simultaneous termination of interests of more
than one beneficiary.  T establishes an irrevocable trust for the
benefit of T's child, C, T's grandchild, GC, and T's great-
grandchild, GGC.  Under the terms of the trust, income and
principal may be distributed to any or all of the living
beneficiaries at the discretion of the trustee.  Upon the death
of C, the trust property is to be distributed to GGC if then
living.  If C is survived by both GC and GGC, both C's and GC's
interests in the trust will terminate on C's death.  However,
because both interests will terminate at the same time and as a
result of one event, only one taxable termination occurs.
   Example 11.  Partial taxable termination.  T creates an
irrevocable trust providing that trust income is to be paid to
T's children, A and B, in such proportions as the trustee
determines for their joint lives.  On the death of the first
child to die, one-half of the trust principal is to be paid to
T's then living grandchildren.  The balance of the trust
principal is to be paid to T's grandchildren on the death of the
survivor of A and B.  If A predeceases B, the distribution
occurring on the termination of A's interest in the trust is a
taxable termination and not a taxable distribution.  It is a
taxable termination because the distribution is a distribution of
a portion of the trust that occurs as a result of the death of A,
a lineal descendant of T.  It is immaterial that a portion of the
trust continues and that B, a person other than a skip person,
thereafter holds an interest in the trust.
   Example 12.  Taxable distribution.  T establishes an
irrevocable trust under which the trust income is payable to T's
child, C, for life.  When T's grandchild, GC, attains 35 years of
age, GC is to receive one-half of the principal.  The remaining
one-half of the principal is to be distributed to GC on C's
death.  Assume that C survives until GC attains age 35.  When the
trustee distributes one-half of the principal to GC on GC's 35th
birthday, the distribution is a taxable distribution because it
is a distribution to a skip person and is neither a taxable
termination nor a direct skip.
   Example 13.  Exercise of withdrawal right as taxable
distribution.  The facts are the same as in Example 12, except GC
holds a continuing right to withdraw trust principal and after
one year GC withdraws $10,000.  The withdrawal by GC is not a
taxable termination because the withdrawal does not terminate C's
interest in the trust.  The withdrawal by GC is a taxable
distribution to GC.
   Example 14.  Interest in trust.  T establishes an irrevocable
trust under which the income is to be paid to T's child, C, for
life.  On the death of C, the trust principal is to be paid to
T's grandchild, GC.  Because C has a present right to receive
income from the trust, C has an interest in the trust.  Because
GC cannot currently receive distributions from the trust, GC does
not have an interest in the trust.
   Example 15.  Support obligation.  T establishes an irrevocable
trust for the benefit of T's grandchild, GC.  The trustee has
discretion to distribute property for GC's support without regard
to the duty or ability of GC's parent, C, to support GC.  Because
GC is a permissible current recipient of trust property, GC has
an interest in the trust.  C does not have an interest in the
trust because the potential use of the trust property to satisfy
C's support obligation is within the discretion of a fiduciary.
C would be treated as having an interest in the trust if the
trustee was required to distribute trust property for GC's
support.
26.2613-1 Skip person.
   For the definition of skip person see 26.2612-1(d).
26.2632-1  Allocation of GST exemption.
   (a) General rule.  Except as otherwise provided in this
section, an individual or the individual's executor may allocate
the individual's $1 million GST exemption at any time from the
date of the transfer through the date for filing the individual's
Federal estate tax return (including any extensions for filing
that have been actually granted).  If no estate tax return is
required to be filed, the GST exemption may be allocated at any
time through the date a Federal estate tax return would be due if
a return were required to be filed (including any extensions
actually granted).  If property is held in trust, the allocation
of GST exemption is made to the entire trust rather than to
specific trust assets.  If a transfer is a direct skip to a
trust, the allocation of GST exemption to the transferred
property is also treated as an allocation of GST exemption to the
trust for purposes of future GSTs with respect to the trust by
the same transferor.
   (b) Lifetime allocations--(1) Automatic allocation to direct
skips--(i) In general.  If a direct skip occurs during the
transferor's lifetime, the transferor's GST exemption not
previously allocated (unused GST exemption) is automatically
allocated to the transferred property (but not in excess of the
fair market value of the property on the date of the transfer).
The transferor may prevent the automatic allocation of GST
exemption by describing on a timely-filed United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 709) the transfer
and the extent to which the automatic allocation is not to apply.
In addition, a timely-filed Form 709 accompanied by payment of
the GST tax (as shown on the return with respect to the direct
skip) is sufficient to prevent an automatic allocation of GST
exemption with respect to the transferred property.  See
paragraph (c)(4) of this section for special rules in the case of
direct skips treated as occurring at the termination of an estate
tax inclusion period.
   (ii) Time for filing Form 709.  A Form 709 is timely filed if
it is filed on or before the date required for reporting the
transfer if it were a taxable gift (i.e., the date prescribed by
section 6075(b), including any extensions to file actually
granted (the due date)).  Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(1)(iii) of this section, the automatic allocation of GST
exemption (or the election to prevent the allocation, if made) is
irrevocable after the due date.  An automatic allocation of GST
exemption is effective as of the date of the transfer to which it
relates.  Except as provided above, a Form 709 need not be filed
to report an automatic allocation.
   (iii) Transitional rule.  An election to prevent an automatic
allocation of GST exemption filed on or before January 26, 1996,
becomes irrevocable on July 24, 1996.
   (2) Allocation to other transfers--(i) In general.  An
allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on
Form 709.  The allocation must clearly identify the trust to
which the allocation is being made, the amount of GST exemption
allocated to it, and if the allocation is late or if an inclusion
ratio greater than zero is claimed, the value of the trust assets
at the effective date of the allocation.  See paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.  The allocation should also state the
inclusion ratio of the trust after the allocation.  Except as
otherwise provided in this paragraph, an allocation of GST
exemption may be made by a formula; e.g., the allocation may be
expressed in terms of the amount necessary to produce an
inclusion ratio of zero.  However, formula allocations made with
respect to charitable lead annuity trusts are not valid except to
the extent they are dependent on values as finally determined for
Federal estate or gift tax purposes.  With respect to a timely
allocation, an allocation of GST exemption becomes irrevocable
after the due date of the return.  Except as provided in
26.2642-3 (relating to charitable lead annuity trusts), an
allocation of GST exemption to a trust is void to the extent the
amount allocated exceeds the amount necessary to obtain an
inclusion ratio of zero with respect to the trust.  See
26.2642-1 for the definition of inclusion ratio.  An allocation
is also void if the allocation is made with respect to a trust
that has no GST potential with respect to the transferor making
the allocation, at the time of the allocation.  For this purpose,
a trust has GST potential even if the possibility of a GST is so
remote as to be negligible.
   (ii) Effective date of allocation--(A) In general. (1) Except
as otherwise provided, an allocation of GST exemption is
effective as of the date of any transfer as to which the Form 709
on which it is made is a timely filed return (a timely
allocation).  If more than one timely allocation is made, the
earlier allocation is modified only if the later allocation
clearly identifies the transfer and the nature and extent of the
modification.  Except as provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an allocation to a trust made on a Form 709 filed after
the due date for reporting a transfer to the trust (a late
allocation) is effective on the date the Form 709 is filed and is
deemed to precede in point of time any taxable event occurring on
such date.  For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2)(ii), the Form
709 is deemed filed on the date it is postmarked to the Internal
Revenue Service Center.   See 26.2642-2 regarding the effect of
a late allocation in determining the inclusion ratio, etc.  See
paragraph (c)(1) of this section regarding allocation of GST
exemption to property subject to an estate tax inclusion period.
If it is unclear whether an allocation of GST exemption on a Form
709 is a late or a timely allocation to a trust, the allocation
is effective in the following order--
   (i) To any transfer to the trust disclosed on the return as to
which the return is a timely return;
   (ii) As a late allocation; and
   (iii) To any transfer to the trust not disclosed on the return
as to which the return would be a timely return.
   (2) A late allocation to a trust may be made on a Form 709
that is timely filed with respect to another transfer.  A late
allocation is irrevocable when made.
   (B) Amount of allocation.  If other transfers exist with
respect to which GST exemption could be allocated under
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(ii) and (iii), any GST exemption
allocated under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(i) of this section is
allocated in an amount equal to the value of the transferred
property as reported on the Form 709.  Thus, if the GST exemption
allocated on the Form 709 exceeds the value of the transfers
reported on that return that have generation-skipping potential,
the initial allocation under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(i) of
this section is in the amount of the value of those transfers as
reported on that return.  Any remaining amount of GST exemption
allocated on that return is then allocated pursuant to paragraphs
(b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section, notwithstanding
any subsequent upward adjustment in value of the transfers
reported on the return.
   (iii) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this paragraph (b):
   Example 1.  Modification of allocation of GST exemption.  T
transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable generation-skipping trust on
December 1, 1996.  The transfer to the trust is not a direct
skip.  The date prescribed for filing the gift tax return
reporting the taxable gift is April 15, 1997.  On February 10,
1997, T files a Form 709 allocating $50,000 of GST exemption to
the trust.  On April 10 of the same year, T files an amended Form
709 allocating $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust in a manner
that clearly indicates the intention to modify and supersede the
prior allocation with respect to the 1996 transfer.  The
allocation made on the April 10 return supersedes the prior
allocation because it is made on a timely-filed Form 709 that
clearly identifies the trust and the nature and extent of the
modification of GST exemption allocation.  The allocation of
$100,000 of GST exemption to the trust is effective as of
December 1, 1996.  The result would be the same if the amended
Form 709 decreased the amount of the GST exemption allocated to
the trust.
   Example 2.  Modification of allocation of GST exemption.  The
facts are the same as in Example 1, except on July 10, 1997, T
files a Form 709 attempting to reduce the earlier allocation.
The return is not a timely-filed return.  The $100,000 GST
exemption allocated to the trust, as amended on April 10, 1997,
remains in effect because an allocation, once made, is
irrevocable and may not be modified after the last date on which
a timely-filed Form 709 can be filed.
   Example 3.  Effective date of late allocation of GST
exemption.  T transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable generation-
skipping trust on December 1, 1996.  The transfer to the trust is
not a direct skip.  The date prescribed for filing the gift tax
return reporting the taxable gift is April 15, 1997.  On December
1, 1997, T files a Form 709 and allocates $50,000 to the trust.
The allocation is effective as of December 1, 1997.
   Example 4.  Effective date of late allocation of GST
exemption.  T transfers $100,000 to a generation-skipping trust
on December 1, 1996, in a transfer that is not a direct skip.  T
does not make an allocation of GST exemption on a timely-filed
Form 709.  On July 1, 1997, the trustee makes a taxable
distribution from the trust to T's grandchild in the amount of
$30,000.  Immediately prior to the distribution, the value of the
trust assets was $150,000.  On the same date, T allocates GST
exemption to the trust in the amount of $50,000.  The allocation
of GST exemption on the date of the transfer is treated as
preceding in point of time the taxable distribution.  At the time
of the GST, the trust has an inclusion ratio of .6667 (1 -
(50,000/150,000)).
   Example 5.  Automatic allocation to split-gift direct skip.
On May 15, 1996, T transfers $50,000 to a trust in a direct skip.
T does not file a timely gift tax return electing out of the
automatic allocation.  On April 30, 1998, T and T's spouse, S,
file an initial gift tax return for 1996 on which they consent,
pursuant to section 2513, to have the gift treated as if one-half
had been made by each.  As a result of the election under section
2513, which is retroactive to the date of T's transfer, T and S
are each treated as the transferor of one-half of the property
transferred in the direct skip.  Thus, $25,000 of T's unused GST
exemption and $25,000 of S's unused GST exemption is
automatically allocated to the trust.  Both allocations are
effective on and after the date that T made the transfer.
  (c) Special rules during an estate tax inclusion period--(1)
In general.  An allocation of GST exemption (including an
automatic allocation) to property subject to an estate tax
inclusion period (ETIP) that is made prior to termination of the
ETIP cannot be revoked, but becomes effective no earlier than the
date of any termination of the ETIP with respect to the trust.
Where an allocation has not been made prior to the termination of
the ETIP, an allocation is effective at the termination of the
ETIP during the transferor's lifetime if made by the due date for
filing a Form 709 that would apply to a taxable gift occurring at
the time the ETIP terminates (timely ETIP return).  An allocation
is effective in the case of the termination of the ETIP on the
death of the transferor as provided in paragraph (d) of this
section.  If any part of a trust is subject to an ETIP, the
entire trust is subject to the ETIP.  See 26.2642-1(b)(2) for
rules determining the inclusion ratio applicable in the case of
GSTs during an ETIP.
   (2) Estate tax inclusion period defined--(i) In general.  An
ETIP is the period during which, should death occur, the value of
transferred property would be includible (other than by reason of
section 2035) in the gross estate of--
   (A)  The transferor; or
   (B)  The spouse of the transferor.
   (ii) Exceptions--(A) For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, the value of transferred property is not considered as
being subject to inclusion in the gross estate of the transferor
or the spouse of the transferor if the possibility that the
property will be included is so remote as to be negligible.  A
possibility is so remote as to be negligible if it can be
ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5
percent probability that the property will be included in the
gross estate.
   (B) For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the
value of transferred property is not considered as being subject
to inclusion in the gross estate of the spouse of the transferor,
if the spouse possesses with respect to any transfer to the
trust, a right to withdraw no more than the greater of $5,000 or
5 percent of the trust corpus, and such withdrawal right
terminates no later than 60 days after the transfer to the trust.
   (C) The rules of this paragraph (c)(2) do not apply to
qualified terminable interest property with respect to which the
special election under 26.2652-2 has been made.
   (3) Termination of an ETIP.  An ETIP terminates on the first
to occur of--
   (i) The death of the transferor;
   (ii) The time at which no portion of the property is
includible in the transferor's gross estate (other than by reason
of section 2035) or, in the case of an individual who is a
transferor solely by reason of an election under section 2513,
the time at which no portion would be includible in the gross
estate of the individual's spouse (other than by reason of
section 2035);
   (iii) The time of a GST, but only with respect to the property
involved in the GST; or
   (iv) In the case of an ETIP arising by reason of an interest
or power held by the transferor's spouse under subsection
(c)(2)(i)(B) of this section, at the first to occur of--
   (A) The death of the spouse; or
   (B) The time at which no portion of the property would be
includible in the spouse's gross estate (other than by reason of
section 2035).
   (4) Treatment of direct skips.  If property transferred to a
skip person is subject to an ETIP, the direct skip is treated as
occurring on the termination of the ETIP.
   (5) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the rules of
this section as they apply to the termination of an ETIP during
the lifetime of the transferor.  In each example assume that T
transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable trust:
    Example 1.  Allocation of GST exemption during ETIP.  The
trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to T
for 9 years or until T's prior death.  The trust principal is to
be paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income
interest.  If T dies within the 9-year period, the value of the
trust principal is includible in T's gross estate under section
2036(a).  Thus, the trust is subject to an ETIP.  T files a
timely Form 709 reporting the transfer and allocating $100,000 of
GST exemption to the trust.  The allocation of GST exemption to
the trust is not effective until the termination of the ETIP.
   Example 2.  Effect of prior allocation on termination of ETIP.
The facts are the same as in Example 1, except the trustee has
the power to invade trust principal on behalf of T's grandchild,
GC, during the term of T's income interest.  In year 4, when the
value of the trust is $200,000, the trustee distributes $15,000
to GC.  The distribution is a taxable distribution.  The ETIP
with respect to the property distributed to GC terminates at the
time of the taxable distribution.  See paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of
this section.  Solely for purposes of determining the trust's
inclusion ratio with respect to the taxable distribution, the
prior $100,000 allocation of GST exemption (as well as any
additional allocation made on a timely ETIP return) is effective
immediately prior to the taxable distribution.  See 26.2642-
1(b)(2).  The trust's inclusion ratio with respect to the taxable
distribution is therefore .50 (1-(100,000/200,000)).
   Example 3.  Split-gift transfers subject to ETIP.  The trust
instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to T for 9
years or until T's prior death.  The trust principal is to be
paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income interest.
T files a timely Form 709 reporting the transfer.  T's spouse, S,
consents to have the gift treated as made one-half by S under
section 2513.  Because S is treated as transferring one-half of
the property to T's grandchild, S becomes the transferor of one-
half of the trust for purposes of chapter 13.  Because the value
of the trust would be includible in T's gross estate if T died
immediately after the transfer, S's transfer is subject to an
ETIP.  If S should die prior to the termination of the trust, S's
executor may allocate S's GST exemption to the trust, but only to
the portion of the trust for which S is treated as the
transferor.  However, the allocation does not become effective
until the earlier of the expiration of T's income interest or T's
death.
   Example 4.  Transfer of retained interest as ETIP termination.
The trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to
T for 9 years or until T's prior death.  The trust principal is
to be paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income
interest.  Four years after the initial transfer, T transfers the
income interest to T's sibling.  The ETIP with respect to the
trust terminates on T's transfer of the income interest because,
after the transfer, the trust property would not be includible in
T's gross estate (other than by reason of section 2035) if T died
at that time.
   (d) Allocations after the transferor's death--(1) Allocation
by executor.  Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (d),
an allocation of a decedent's unused GST exemption by the
executor of the decedent's estate is made on the appropriate
United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax
Return (Form 706 or Form 706NA) filed on or before the date
prescribed for filing the return by section 6075(a) (including
any extensions actually granted (the due date)).  An allocation
of GST exemption with respect to property included in the gross
estate of a decedent is effective as of the date of death.  A
timely allocation of GST exemption by an executor with respect to
a lifetime transfer of property that is not included in the
transferor's gross estate is made on a Form 709.  A late
allocation of GST exemption by an executor, other than an
allocation that is deemed to be made under section 2632(b)(1),
with respect to a lifetime transfer of property is made on Form
706, Form 706NA or Form 709 (filed on or before the due date of
the transferor's estate tax return) and is effective as of the
date the allocation is filed.  An allocation of GST exemption to
a trust (whether or not funded at the time the Form 706 or Form
706NA is filed) is effective if the notice of allocation clearly
identifies the trust and the amount of the decedent's GST
exemption allocated to the trust.  An executor may allocate the
decedent's GST exemption by use of a formula.  For purposes of
this section, an allocation is void if the allocation is made for
a trust that has no GST potential with respect to the transferor
for whom the allocation is being made, as of the date of the
transferor's death.  For this purpose, a trust has GST potential
even if the possibility of a GST is so remote as to be
negligible.
   (2) Automatic allocation after death.  A decedent's unused GST
exemption is automatically allocated on the due date for filing
Form 706 or Form 706NA to the extent not otherwise allocated by
the decedent's executor on or before that date.  The automatic
allocation occurs whether or not a return is actually required to
be filed.  Unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to
the rules of 26.2642-2(b)), on the basis of the value of the
property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 11
(chapter 11 value), first to direct skips treated as occurring at
the transferor's death.  The balance, if any, of unused GST
exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules of
26.2642-2(b)) on the basis of the chapter 11 value of the
nonexempt portion of the trust property (or in the case of trusts
that are not included in the gross estate, on the basis of the
date of death value of the trust) to trusts with respect to which
a taxable termination may occur or from which a taxable
distribution may be made.  The automatic allocation of GST
exemption is irrevocable, and an allocation made by the executor
after the automatic allocation is made is ineffective.  No
automatic allocation of GST exemption is made to a trust that
will have a new transferor with respect to the entire trust prior
to the occurrence of any GST with respect to the trust.  In
addition, no automatic allocation of GST exemption is made to a
trust if, during the nine month period ending immediately after
the death of the transferor--
   (i) No GST has occurred with respect to the trust; and
   (ii) At the end of such period no future GST can occur with
respect to the trust.
26.2641-1  Applicable rate of tax.
   The rate of tax applicable to any GST (applicable rate) is
determined by multiplying the maximum Federal estate tax rate in
effect at the time of the GST by the inclusion ratio (as defined
in 26.2642-1).  For this purpose, the maximum Federal estate tax
rate is the maximum rate set forth under section 2001(c) (without
regard to section 2001(c)(2)).
26.2642-1  Inclusion ratio.
   (a) In general.  Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the inclusion ratio is determined by subtracting the
applicable fraction (rounded to the nearest one-thousandth
(.001)) from 1.  In rounding the applicable fraction to the
nearest one-thousandth, any amount that is midway between one
one-thousandth and another one-thousandth is rounded up to the
higher of those two amounts.
   (b) Numerator of applicable fraction--(1) In general.
Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b), and in
26.2642-3 (providing a special rule for charitable lead annuity
trusts) and 26.2642-4 (providing rules for the redetermination of
the applicable fraction), the numerator of the applicable
fraction is the amount of GST exemption allocated to the trust
(or to the transferred property in the case of a direct skip not
in trust).
   (2) GSTs occurring during an ETIP--(i) In general.  For
purposes of determining the inclusion ratio with respect to a
taxable termination or a taxable distribution that occurs during
an ETIP, the numerator of the applicable fraction is the sum of--
 (A) The GST exemption previously allocated to the trust
(including any allocation made to the trust prior to any taxable
termination or distribution) reduced (but not below zero) by the
nontax amount of any prior GSTs with respect to the trust; and
   (B) Any GST exemption allocated to the trust on a timely ETIP
return filed after the termination of the ETIP.  See 26.2632-
1(c)(5) Example 2.
   (ii) Nontax amount of a prior GST.  (1) The nontax amount of a
prior GST with respect to the trust is the amount of the GST
multiplied by the applicable fraction attributable to the trust
at the time of the prior GST.
   (2) For rules regarding the allocation of GST exemption to
property during an ETIP, see 26.2632-1(c).
   (c) Denominator of applicable fraction--(1) In general.
Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c) and in
26.2642-3 and 26.2642-4, the denominator of the applicable
fraction is the value of the property transferred to the trust
(or transferred in a direct skip not in trust) (as determined
under 26.2642-2) reduced by the sum of--
   (i) Any Federal estate tax and any State death tax incurred by
reason of the transfer that is chargeable to the trust and is
actually recovered from the trust;
   (ii) The amount of any charitable deduction allowed under
section 2055, 2106, or 2522 with respect to the transfer; and
   (iii) In the case of a direct skip, the value of the portion
of the transfer that is a nontaxable gift.  See paragraph (c)(3)
of this section for the definition of nontaxable gift.
   (2) Zero denominator.  If the denominator of the applicable
fraction is zero, the inclusion ratio is zero.
   (3) Nontaxable gifts.  Generally, for purposes of chapter 13,
a transfer is a nontaxable gift to the extent the transfer is
excluded from taxable gifts by reason of section 2503(b) (after
application of section 2513) or section 2503(e).  However, a
transfer to a trust for the benefit of an individual is not a
nontaxable gift for purposes of this section unless--
   (i) Trust principal or income may, during the individual's
lifetime, be distributed only to or for the benefit of the
individual; and
   (ii) The assets of the trust will be includible in the gross
estate of the individual if the individual dies before the trust
terminates.
   (d) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section.  See 26.2652-2(d) Examples 2 and 3
for illustrations of the computation of the inclusion ratio where
the special (reverse QTIP) election may be applicable.
   Example 1.  Computation of the inclusion ratio.  T transfers
$100,000 to a newly-created irrevocable trust providing that
income is to be accumulated for 10 years.  At the end of 10
years, the accumulated income is to be distributed to T's child,
C, and the trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild.  T
allocates $40,000 of T's GST exemption to the trust on a timely-
filed gift tax return.  The applicable fraction with respect to
the trust is .40 ($40,000 (the amount of GST exemption allocated
to the trust) over $100,000 (the value of the property
transferred to the trust)).  The inclusion ratio is .60 (1 -
.40).  If the maximum Federal estate tax rate is 55 percent at
the time of a GST, the rate of tax applicable to the transfer
(applicable rate) will be .333 (55 percent (the maximum estate
tax rate) x .60 (the inclusion ratio)).
   Example 2.  Gift entirely nontaxable.  On December 1, 1996, T
transfers $10,000 to an irrevocable trust for the benefit of T's
grandchild, GC.  GC possesses a right to withdraw any
contributions to the trust such that the entire transfer
qualifies for the annual exclusion under section 2503(b).  Under
the terms of the trust, the income is to be paid to GC for 10
years or until GC's prior death.  Upon the expiration of GC's
income interest, the trust principal is payable to GC or GC's
estate.  The transfer to the trust is a direct skip.  T made no
prior gifts to or for the benefit of GC during 1996.  The entire
$10,000 transfer is a nontaxable transfer.  For purposes of
computing the tax on the direct skip, the denominator of the
applicable fraction is zero, and thus, the inclusion ratio is
zero.
   Example 3.  Gift nontaxable in part.  T transfers $12,000 to
an irrevocable trust for the benefit of T's grandchild, GC.
Under the terms of the trust, the income is to be paid to GC for
10 years or until GC's prior death.  Upon the expiration of GC's
income interest, the trust principal is payable to GC or GC's
estate.  Further, GC has the right to withdraw $10,000 of any
contribution to the trust such that $10,000 of the transfer
qualifies for the annual exclusion under section 2503(b).  The
amount of the nontaxable transfer is $10,000.  Solely for
purposes of computing the tax on the direct skip, T's transfer is
divided into two portions.  One portion is equal to the amount of
the nontaxable transfer ($10,000) and has a zero inclusion ratio;
the other portion is $2,000 ($12,000 - $10,000).  With respect to
the $2,000 portion, the denominator of the applicable fraction is
$2,000.  Assuming that T has sufficient GST exemption available,
the numerator of the applicable fraction is $2,000 (unless T
elects to have the automatic allocation provisions not apply).
Thus, assuming T does not elect to have the automatic allocation
not apply, the applicable fraction is one ($2,000/$2,000 = 1) and
the inclusion ratio is zero (1 - 1 = 0).
   Example 4.  Gift nontaxable in part.  Assume the same facts as
in Example 3, except T files a timely Form 709 electing that the
automatic allocation of GST exemption not apply to the $12,000
transferred in the direct skip.  T's transfer is divided into two
portions, a $10,000 portion with a zero inclusion ratio and a
$2,000 portion with an applicable fraction of zero (0/$2,000 = 0)
and an inclusion ratio of one (1 - 0 = 1).
26.2642-2 Valuation.
   (a) Lifetime transfers--(1) In general.  For purposes of
determining the denominator of the applicable fraction, the value
of property transferred during life is its fair market value on
the effective date of the allocation of GST exemption.  In the
case of a timely allocation under 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii), the
denominator of the applicable fraction is the fair market value
of the property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12.
   (2) Special rule for late allocations during life.  If a
transferor makes a late allocation of GST exemption to a trust,
the value of the property transferred to the trust is the fair
market value of the trust assets determined on the effective date
of the allocation of GST exemption.  Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (a)(2), if a transferor makes a late allocation
of GST exemption to a trust, the transferor may, solely for
purposes of determining the fair market value of the trust
assets, elect to treat the allocation as having been made on the
first day of the month during which the late allocation is made
(valuation date).  An election under this paragraph (a)(2) is not
effective with respect to a life insurance policy or a trust
holding a life insurance policy, if the insured individual has
died.  An allocation subject to the election contained in this
paragraph (a)(2) is not effective until it is actually filed with
the Internal Revenue Service.  The election is made by stating on
the Form 709 on which the allocation is made--
   (i) That the election is being made;
   (ii) The applicable valuation date; and
   (iii) The fair market value of the trust assets on the
valuation date.
   (b) Transfers at death--(1) In general.  Except as provided in
paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, in determining the
denominator of the applicable fraction, the value of property
included in the decedent's gross estate is its value for purposes
of chapter 11.  In the case of qualified real property with
respect to which the election under section 2032A is made, the
value of the property is the value determined under section 2032A
provided the recapture agreement described in section 2032A(d)(2)
filed with the Internal Revenue Service specifically provides for
the signatories' consent to the imposition of, and personal
liability for, additional GST tax in the event an additional
estate tax is imposed under section 2032A(c).  See 26.2642-
4(a)(4).  If the recapture agreement does not contain these
provisions, the value of qualified real property as to which the
election under section 2032A is made is the fair market value of
the property determined without regard to the provisions of
section 2032A.
   (2) Special rule for pecuniary payments--(i) In general.  If a
pecuniary payment is satisfied with cash, the denominator of the
applicable fraction is the pecuniary amount.  If property other
than cash is used to satisfy a pecuniary payment, the denominator
of the applicable fraction is the pecuniary amount only if
payment must be made with property on the basis of the value of
the property on--
   (A) The date of distribution; or
   (B) A date other than the date of distribution, but only if
the pecuniary payment must be satisfied on a basis that fairly
reflects net appreciation and depreciation (occurring between the
valuation date and the date of distribution) in all of the assets
from which the distribution could have been made.
   (ii) Other pecuniary amounts payable in kind.  The denominator
of the applicable fraction with respect to any property used to
satisfy any other pecuniary payment payable in kind is the date
of distribution value of the property.
   (3) Special rule for residual transfers after payment of a
pecuniary payment--(i) In general.  Except as otherwise provided
in this paragraph (b)(3), the denominator of the applicable
fraction with respect to a residual transfer of property after
the satisfaction of a pecuniary payment is the estate tax value
of the assets available to satisfy the pecuniary payment reduced,
if the pecuniary payment carries appropriate interest (as defined
in paragraph (b)(4) of this section), by the pecuniary amount.
The denominator of the applicable fraction with respect to a
residual transfer of property after the satisfaction of a
pecuniary payment that does not carry appropriate interest is the
estate tax value of the assets available to satisfy the pecuniary
payment reduced by the present value of the pecuniary payment.
For purposes of this paragraph (b)(3)(i), the present value of
the pecuniary payment is determined by using--
   (A) The interest rate applicable under section 7520 at the
death of the transferor; and
   (B) The period between the date of the transferor's death and
the date the pecuniary amount is paid.
   (ii) Special rule for residual transfers after pecuniary
payments payable in kind.  The denominator of the applicable
fraction with respect to any residual transfer after satisfaction
of a pecuniary payment payable in kind is the date of
distribution value of the property distributed in satisfaction of
the residual transfer, unless the pecuniary payment must be
satisfied on the basis of the value of the property on--
   (A) The date of distribution; or
   (B) A date other than the date of distribution, but only if
the pecuniary payment must be satisfied on a basis that fairly
reflects net appreciation and depreciation (occurring between the
valuation death and the date of distribution) in all of the
assets from which the distribution could have been made.
   (4) Appropriate interest--(i) In general.  For purposes of
this section and 26.2654-1 (relating to certain trusts treated
as separate trusts), appropriate interest means that interest
must be payable from the date of death of the transferor
(or from the date specified under applicable State law requiring
the payment of interest) to the date of payment at a rate--
   (A) At least equal to--
   (1) The statutory rate of interest, if any, applicable to
pecuniary bequests under the law of the State whose law governs
the administration of the estate or trust; or
   (2) If no such rate is indicated under applicable State law,
80 percent of the rate that is applicable under section 7520 at
the death of the transferor; and
   (B) Not in excess of the greater of--
   (1) The statutory rate of interest, if any, applicable to
pecuniary bequests under the law of the State whose law governs
the administration of the trust; or
   (2) 120 percent of the rate that is applicable under section
7520 at the death of the transferor.
   (ii)  Pecuniary payments deemed to carry appropriate interest.
For purposes of this paragraph (b)(4), if a pecuniary payment
does not carry appropriate interest, the pecuniary payment is
considered to carry appropriate interest to the extent--
   (A) The entire payment is made or property is irrevocably set
aside to satisfy the entire pecuniary payment within 15 months of
the transferor's death; or
   (B) The governing instrument or applicable local law
specifically requires the executor or trustee to allocate to the
pecuniary payment a pro rata share of the income earned by the
fund from which the pecuniary payment is to be made between the
date of death of the transferor and the date of payment.
For purposes of paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A) of this section, property
is irrevocably set aside if it is segregated and held in a
separate account pending distribution.
   (c) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section:
   Example 1.  T transfers $100,000 to a newly-created
irrevocable trust on December 15, 1996.  The trust provides that
income is to be paid to T's child for 10 years.  At the end of
the 10-year period, the trust principal is to be paid to T's
grandchild.  T does not allocate any GST exemption to the trust
on the gift tax return reporting the transfer.  On November 15,
1997, T files a Form 709 allocating $50,000 of GST exemption to
the trust.  Because the allocation was made on a late filed
return, the value of the property transferred to the trust is
determined on the date the allocation is filed (unless an
election is made pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section to
value the trust property as of the first day of the month in
which the allocation document is filed with the Internal Revenue
Service).  On November 15, 1997, the value of the trust property
is $150,000.  Effective as of November 15, 1997, the applicable
fraction with respect to the trust is .333 ($50,000 (the amount
of GST exemption allocated to the trust) over $150,000 (the value
of the trust principal on the effective date of the GST exemption
allocation)), and the inclusion ratio is .667 (1.0 - .333).
   Example 2.  The facts are the same as in Example 1, except the
value of the trust property is $80,000 on November 15, 1997.  The
applicable fraction is .625 ($50,000 over $80,000) and the
inclusion ratio is .375 (1.0 - .625).
   Example 3.  T transfers $100,000 to a newly-created
irrevocable trust on December 15, 1996.  The trust provides that
income is to be paid to T's child for 10 years.  At the end of
the 10-year period, the trust principal is to be paid to T's
grandchild.  T does not allocate any GST exemption to the trust
on the gift tax return reporting the transfer.  On November 15,
1997, T files a Form 709 allocating $50,000 of GST exemption to
the trust.  T elects to value the trust principal on the first
day of the month in which the allocation is made pursuant to the
election provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.  Because
the late allocation is made in November, the value of the trust
is determined as of November 1, 1997.
26.2642-3 Special rule for charitable lead annuity trusts.
   (a) In general.  In determining the applicable fraction with
respect to a charitable lead annuity trust--
   (1) The numerator is the adjusted generation-skipping transfer
tax exemption (adjusted GST exemption); and
   (2) The denominator is the value of all property in the trust
immediately after the termination of the charitable lead annuity.
   (b) Adjusted GST exemption defined.  The adjusted GST
exemption is the amount of GST exemption allocated to the trust
increased by an amount equal to the interest that would accrue if
an amount equal to the allocated GST exemption were invested at
the rate used to determine the amount of the estate or gift tax
charitable deduction, compounded annually, for the actual period
of the charitable lead annuity.  If a late allocation is made to
a charitable lead annuity trust, the adjusted GST exemption is
the amount of GST exemption allocated to the trust increased by
the interest that would accrue if invested at such rate for the
period beginning on the date of the late allocation and extending
for the balance of the actual period of the charitable lead
annuity.  The amount of GST exemption allocated to a charitable
lead annuity trust is not reduced even though it is ultimately
determined that the allocation of a lesser amount of GST
exemption would have resulted in an inclusion ratio of zero.  For
purposes of chapter 13, a charitable lead annuity trust is any
trust providing an interest in the form of a guaranteed annuity
described in 25.2522(c)-3(c)(2)(vi) of this chapter for which
the transferor is allowed a charitable deduction for Federal
estate or gift tax purposes.
   (c) Example.  The following example illustrates the provisions
of this section:
   Example.  T creates a charitable lead annuity trust for a 10-
year term with the remainder payable to T's grandchild.  T timely
allocates an amount of GST exemption to the trust which T expects
will ultimately result in a zero inclusion ratio.  However, at
the end of the charitable lead interest, because the property has
not appreciated to the extent T anticipated, the numerator of the
applicable fraction is greater than the denominator.  The
inclusion ratio for the trust is zero.  No portion of the GST
exemption allocated to the trust is restored to T or to T's
estate.
26.2642-4 Redetermination of applicable fraction.
   (a) In general.  The applicable fraction for a trust is
redetermined whenever additional exemption is allocated to the
trust or when certain changes occur with respect to the principal
of the trust.  Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph
(a), the numerator of the redetermined applicable fraction is the
sum of the amount of GST exemption currently being allocated to
the trust (if any) plus the value of the nontax portion of the
trust, and the denominator of the redetermined applicable
fraction is the value of the trust principal immediately after
the event occurs.  The nontax portion of a trust is determined by
multiplying the value of the trust assets, determined immediately
prior to the event, by the then applicable fraction.
   (1) Multiple transfers to a single trust.  If property is
added to an existing trust, the denominator of the redetermined
applicable fraction is the value of the trust immediately after
the addition reduced as provided in 26.2642-1(c).
   (2) Consolidation of separate trusts.  If separate trusts
created by one transferor are consolidated, a single applicable
fraction for the consolidated trust is determined.  The numerator
of the redetermined applicable fraction is the sum of the nontax
portions of each trust immediately prior to the consolidation.
   (3) Property included in transferor's gross estate.  If the
value of property held in a trust created by the transferor, with
respect to which an allocation was made at a time that the trust
was not subject to an ETIP, is included in the transferor's gross
estate, the applicable fraction is redetermined if additional GST
exemption is allocated to the property.  The numerator of the
redetermined applicable fraction is an amount equal to the nontax
portion of the property immediately after the death of the
transferor increased by the amount of GST exemption allocated by
the executor of the transferor's estate to the trust.  If
additional GST exemption is not allocated to the trust, then,
except as provided in this paragraph (a)(3), the  applicable
fraction immediately before death is not changed, if the trust
was not subject to an ETIP at the time GST exemption was
allocated to the trust.  In any event, the denominator of the
applicable fraction is reduced to reflect any federal or state,
estate or inheritance taxes paid from the trust.
   (4) Imposition of recapture tax under section 2032A--(i) If an
additional estate tax is imposed under section 2032A and if the
section 2032A election was effective (under 26.2642-2(b)) for
purposes of the GST tax, the applicable fraction with respect to
the property is redetermined as of the date of death of the
transferor.  In making the redetermination, any available GST
exemption not allocated at the death of the transferor (or at a
prior recapture event) is automatically allocated to the
property.  The denominator of the applicable fraction is the fair
market value of the property at the date of the transferor's
death reduced as provided in 26.2642-1(c) and further reduced by
the amount of the additional GST tax actually recovered from the
trust.
   (ii) The GST tax imposed with respect to any taxable
termination, taxable distribution, or direct skip occurring prior
to the recapture event is recomputed based on the applicable
fraction as redetermined.  Any additional GST tax as recomputed
is due and payable on the date that is six months after the event
that causes the imposition of the additional estate tax under
section 2032A.  The additional GST tax is remitted with Form 706-
A and is reported by attaching a statement to Form 706-A showing
the computation of the additional GST tax.
   (iii) The applicable fraction, as redetermined under this
section, is also used in determining any GST tax imposed with
respect to GSTs occurring after the date of the recapture event.
   (b) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
principles of this section:
   Example 1.  Allocation of additional exemption.  T transfers
$200,000 to an irrevocable trust under which the income is
payable to T's child, C, for life.  Upon the termination of the
trust, the remainder is payable to T's grandchild, GC.  At a time
when no ETIP exists with respect to the trust property, T makes a
timely allocation of $100,000 of GST exemption, resulting in an
inclusion ratio of .50.  Subsequently, when the entire trust
property is valued at $500,000, T allocates an additional
$100,000 of T's unused GST exemption to the trust.  The inclusion
ratio of the trust is recomputed at that time.  The numerator of
the applicable fraction is $350,000 ($250,000 (the nontax portion
as of the date of the allocation) plus $100,000 (the GST
exemption currently being allocated)).  The denominator is
$500,000 (the date of allocation fair market value of the trust).
The inclusion ratio is .30 (1 - .70).
   Example 2.  Multiple transfers to a trust, allocation both
timely and late.  On December 10, 1993, T transfers $10,000 to an
irrevocable trust that does not satisfy the requirements of
section 2642(c)(2).  T makes identical transfers to the trust on
December 10, 1994, 1995, 1996, and on January 15, 1997.
Immediately after the transfer on January 15, 1997, the value of
the trust principal is $40,000.  On January 14, 1998, when the
value of the trust principal is $50,000, T allocates $30,000 of
GST exemption to the trust.  T discloses the 1997 transfer on the
Form 709 filed on January 14, 1998.  Thus, T's allocation is a
timely allocation with respect to the transfer in 1997, $10,000
of the allocation is effective as of the date of that transfer,
and, on and after January 15, 1997, the inclusion ratio of the
trust is .75 (1 - ($10,000/$40,000)).  The balance of the
allocation is a late allocation with respect to prior transfers
to the trust and is effective as of January 14, 1998.  In
redetermining the inclusion ratio as of that date, the numerator
of the redetermined applicable fraction is $32,500 ($12,500 (.25
x $50,000), the nontax portion of the trust on January 14, 1998)
plus $20,000 (the amount of GST exemption allocated late to the
trust).  The denominator of the new applicable fraction is
$50,000 (the value of the trust principal at the time of the late
allocation).
   Example 3.  Excess allocation. (i) T creates an irrevocable
trust for the benefit of T's child and grandchild in 1996
transferring $50,000 to the trust on the date of creation.  T
allocates no GST exemption to the trust on the Form 709 reporting
the transfer.  On July 1, 1997 (when the value of the trust
property is $60,000), T transfers an additional $40,000 to the
trust.
   (ii) On April 15, 1998, when the value of the trust is
$150,000, T files a Form 709 reporting the 1997 transfer and
allocating $150,000 of GST exemption to the trust.  The
allocation is a timely allocation of $40,000 with respect to the
1997 transfer and is effective as of that date.  Thus, the
applicable fraction for the trust as of July 1, 1997 is .40
($40,000/$100,000 ($40,000 + $60,000)).
   (iii) The allocation is also a late allocation of $90,000, the
amount necessary to attain a zero inclusion ratio on April 15,
1998, computed as follows: $60,000 (the nontax portion
immediately prior to the allocation (.40 X $150,000)) plus
$90,000 (the additional allocation necessary to produce a zero
inclusion ratio based on a denominator of $150,000)/$150,000
equals one and, thus, an inclusion ratio of zero.  The balance of
the allocation, $20,000 ($150,000 less the timely allocation of
$40,000 less the late allocation of $90,000) is void.
   Example 4.  Undisclosed transfer.  (i) The facts are the same
as in Example 3, except that on February 1, 1998 (when the value
of the trust is $150,000), T transfers an additional $50,000 to
the trust and the value of the entire trust corpus on April 15,
1998 is $220,000.  The Form 709 filed on April 15, 1998 does not
disclose the 1998 transfer.  Under the rule in 26.2632-
1(b)(2)(ii), the allocation is effective first as a timely
allocation to the 1997 transfer; second, as a late allocation to
the trust as of April 15, 1998; and, finally as a timely
allocation to the February 1, 1998 transfer.  As of April 15,
1998, $55,000, a pro rata portion of the trust assets, is
considered to be the property transferred to the trust on
February 1, 1998 (($50,000/$200,000) X $220,000).  The balance of
the trust, $165,000, represents prior transfers to the trust.
   (ii) As in Example 3, the allocation is a timely allocation as
to the 1997 transfer (and the applicable fraction as of July 1,
1997 is .40) and a late allocation as of 1998.  The amount of the
late allocation is $99,000, computed as follows:  (.40 X $165,000
plus $99,000)/$165,000 = one.
   (iii) The balance of the allocation, $11,000 ($150,000 less
the timely allocation of $40,000 less the late allocation of
$99,000) is a timely allocation as of February 1, 1998.  The
applicable fraction with respect to the trust, as of February 1,
1998, is .355, computed as follows: $60,000 (the nontax portion
of the trust immediately prior to the February 1, 1998 transfer
(.40 X $150,000)) plus $11,000 (the amount of the timely
allocation to the 1998 transfer)/$200,000 (the value of the trust
on February 1, 1998, after the transfer on that date) =
$71,000/$200,000 = .355.
   (iv) The applicable fraction with respect to the trust, as of
April 15, 1998, is .805 computed as follows: $78,100 (the nontax
portion immediately prior to the allocation (.355 X $220,000))
plus $99,000 (the amount of the late allocation)/ $220,000 =
$177,100/$220,000 = .805.
   Example 5.  Redetermination of inclusion ratio on ETIP
termination.  (i)  T transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable trust.
The trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to
T for 9 years or until T's prior death.  The trust principal is
to be paid to T's grandchild, GC, on the termination of T's
income interest.  The trustee has the power to invade trust
principal for the benefit of GC during the term of T's income
interest.  The trust is subject to an ETIP while T holds the
retained income interest.  T files a timely Form 709 reporting
the transfer and allocates $100,000 of GST exemption to the
trust.  In year 4, when the value of the trust is $200,000, the
trustee distributes $15,000 to GC.  The distribution is a taxable
distribution.  Because of the existence of the ETIP, the
inclusion ratio with respect to the taxable distribution is
determined immediately prior to the occurrence of the GST.  Thus,
the inclusion ratio applicable to the year 4 GST is .50 (1 -
($100,000/$200,000)).
   (ii) In year 5, when the value of the trust is again $200,000,
the trustee distributes another $15,000 to GC.  Because the trust
is still subject to the ETIP in year 5, the inclusion ratio with
respect to the year 5 GST is again computed immediately prior to
the GST.  In computing the new inclusion ratio, the numerator of
the applicable fraction is reduced by the nontax portion of prior
GSTs occurring during the ETIP.  Thus, the numerator of the
applicable fraction with respect to the GST in year 5 is $92,500
($100,000 - (.50 X $15,000)) and the inclusion ratio applicable
with respect to the GST in year 5 is .537 (1 - ($92,500/$200,000)
= .463).  Any additional GST exemption allocated on a timely ETIP
return with respect to the GST in year 5 is effective immediately
prior to the transfer.
26.2642-5 Finality of inclusion ratio.
   (a) Direct skips.  The inclusion ratio applicable to a direct
skip becomes final when no additional GST tax (including
additional GST tax payable as a result of a cessation, etc. of
qualified use under section 2032A(c)) may be assessed with
respect to the direct skip.
   (b) Other GSTs.  With respect to taxable distributions and
taxable terminations, the inclusion ratio for a trust becomes
final, on the later of--
   (1) The expiration of the period for assessment with respect
to the first GST tax return filed using that inclusion ratio;
(unless the trust is subject to an election under section 2032A
in which case the applicable date under this subsection is the
expiration of the period of assessment of any additional GST tax
due as a result of a cessation, etc. of qualified use under
section 2032A); or
   (2) The expiration of the period for assessment of Federal
estate tax with respect to the estate of the transferor.
For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2), if an estate tax return is
not required to be filed, the period for assessment is determined
as if a return were required to be filed and as if the return
were timely filed within the period prescribed by section
6075(a).
26.2652-1 Transferor defined; other definitions.
   (a) Transferor defined--(1) In general.  Except as otherwise
provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the individual with
respect to whom property was most recently subject to Federal
estate or gift tax is the transferor of that property for
purposes of chapter 13.  An individual is treated as transferring
any property with respect to which the individual is the
transferor.  Thus, an individual may be a transferor even though
there is no transfer of property under local law at the time the
Federal estate or gift tax applies.  For purposes of this
paragraph, a surviving spouse is the transferor of a qualified
domestic trust created by the deceased spouse that is included in
the surviving spouse's gross estate, provided the trust is not
subject to the election described in 26.2652-2 (reverse QTIP
election).  A surviving spouse is also the transferor of a
qualified domestic trust created by the surviving spouse pursuant
to section 2056(d)(2)(B).
   (2) Transfers subject to Federal estate or gift tax.  For
purposes of this chapter, a transfer is subject to Federal gift
tax if a gift tax is imposed under section 2501(a) (without
regard to exemptions, exclusions, deductions, and credits).  A
transfer is subject to Federal estate tax if the value of the
property is includible in the decedent's gross estate as
determined under section 2031 or section 2103.
   (3) Special rule for certain QTIP trusts.  Solely for purposes
of chapter 13, if a transferor of qualified terminable interest
property (QTIP) elects under 26.2652-2(a) to treat the property
as if the QTIP election had not been made (reverse QTIP
election), the identity of the transferor of the property is
determined without regard to the application of sections 2044,
2207A, and 2519.
   (4) Exercise of certain nongeneral powers of appointment.  The
exercise of a power of appointment that is not a general power of
appointment (as defined in section 2041(b)) is treated as a
transfer subject to Federal estate or gift tax by the holder of
the power if the power is exercised in a manner that may
postpone or suspend the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of
alienation of an interest in property for a period, measured from
the date of creation of the trust, extending beyond any specified
life in being at the date of creation of the trust plus a period
of 21 years plus, if necessary, a reasonable period of gestation
(perpetuities period).  For purposes of this paragraph (a)(4),
the exercise of a power of appointment that validly postpones or
suspends the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation
of an interest in property for a term of years that will not
exceed 90 years (measured from the date of creation of the trust)
is not an exercise that may extend beyond the perpetuities
period.
   (5) Split-gift transfers.  In the case of a transfer with
respect to which the donor's spouse makes an election under
section 2513 to treat the gift as made one-half by the spouse,
the electing spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of
the entire value of the property transferred by the donor,
regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed
to have transferred under section 2513.  The donor is treated as
the transferor of one-half of the value of the entire property.
See 26.2632-1(c)(5) Example 3, regarding allocation of GST
exemption with respect to split-gift transfers subject to an
ETIP.
   (6) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
principles of this paragraph (a):
   Example 1.  Identity of transferor.  T transfers $100,000 to a
trust for the sole benefit of T's grandchild.  The transfer is
subject to Federal gift tax because a gift tax is imposed under
section 2501(a) (without regard to exemptions, exclusions,
deductions, and credits).  Thus, for purposes of chapter 13, T is
the transferor of the $100,000.  It is immaterial that a portion
of the transfer is excluded from the total amount of T's taxable
gift by reason of section 2503(b).
   Example 2.  Gift splitting and identity of transferor.  The
facts are the same as in Example 1, except T's spouse, S,
consents under section 2513 to split the gift with T.  For
purposes of chapter 13, S and T are each treated as a transferor
of $50,000 to the trust.
   Example 3.  Change of transferor on subsequent transfer tax
event.  T transfers $100,000 to a trust providing that all the
net trust income is to be paid to T's spouse, S, for S's
lifetime.  T elects under section 2523(f) to treat the transfer
as a transfer of qualified terminable interest property, and T
does not make the reverse QTIP election under section 2652(a)(3).
On S's death, the trust property is included in S's gross estate
under section 2044.  Thus, S becomes the transferor at the time
of S's death.
   Example 4.  Effect of transfer of an interest in trust on
identity of the transferor.  T transfers $100,000 to a trust
providing that all of the net income is to be paid to T's child,
C, for C's lifetime.  At C's death, the trust property is to be
paid to T's grandchild.  C transfers the income interest to X, an
unrelated party, in a transfer that is a completed transfer for
Federal gift tax purposes.  Because C's transfer is a transfer of
a term interest in the trust that does not affect the rights of
other parties with respect to the trust property, T remains the
transferor with respect to the trust.
   Example 5.  Effect of lapse of withdrawal right on identity of
transferor.  T transfers $10,000 to a new trust providing that
the trust income is to be paid to T's child, C, for C's life and,
on the death of C, the trust principal is to be paid to T's
grandchild, GC.  The trustee has discretion to distribute
principal for GC's benefit during C's lifetime.  C has a right to
withdraw $10,000 from the trust for a 60-day period following the
transfer.  Thereafter, the power lapses.  C does not exercise the
withdrawal right.  The transfer by T is subject to Federal gift
tax because a gift tax is imposed under section 2501(a) (without
regard to exemption, exclusions, deductions, and credits) and
thus, T is treated as having transferred the entire $10,000 to
the trust.  On the lapse of the withdrawal right, C becomes a
transferor to the extent C is treated as having made a completed
transfer for purposes of chapter 12.  Therefore, except to the
extent that the amount with respect to which the power of
withdrawal lapses exceeds the greater of $5,000 or 5% of the
value of the trust property, T remains the transferor of the
trust property for purposes of chapter 13.
   Example 6.  Effect of reverse QTIP election on identity of the
transferor.  T establishes a testamentary trust having a
principal of $500,000.  Under the terms of the trust, all trust
income is payable to T's surviving spouse, S, during S's
lifetime.  T's executor makes an election to treat the trust
property as qualified terminable interest property and also makes
the reverse QTIP election.  For purposes of chapter 13, T is the
transferor with respect to the trust.  On S's death, the then
full fair market value of the trust is includible in S's gross
estate under section 2044.  However, because of the reverse QTIP
election, S does not become the transferor with respect to the
trust; T continues to be the transferor.
   Example 7.  Effect of reverse QTIP election on constructive
additions.  The facts are the same as in Example 6, except the
inclusion of the QTIP trust in S's gross estate increased the
Federal estate tax liability of S's estate by $200,000.  The
estate does not exercise the right of recovery from the trust
granted under section 2207A.  Under local law, the beneficiaries
of S's residuary estate (which bears all estate taxes under the
will) could compel the executor to exercise the right of recovery
but do not do so.  Solely for purposes of chapter 13, the
beneficiaries of the residuary estate are not treated as having
made an addition to the trust by reason of their failure to
exercise their right of recovery.  Because of the reverse QTIP
election, for GST purposes, the trust property is not treated as
includible in S's gross estate and, under those circumstances, no
right of recovery exists.
  Example 8.  Effect of reverse QTIP election on constructive
additions.  S, the surviving spouse of T, dies testate.  At the
time of S's death, S was the beneficiary of a trust with respect
to which T's executor made a QTIP election under section
2056(b)(7).  Thus, the trust is includible in S's gross estate
under section 2044.  T's executor also made the reverse QTIP
election with respect to the trust.  S's will provides that all
death taxes payable with respect to the trust are payable from
S's residuary estate.  Since the transferor of the property is
determined without regard to section 2044 and section 2207A, S is
not treated as making a constructive addition to the trust by
reason of the tax apportionment clause in S's will.
   Example 9.  Exercise of a nongeneral power of appointment.  On
May 15, 1990, T established an irrevocable trust under which the
trust income is to be paid to T's child, C, for life.  C is given
a testamentary power to appoint the remainder in further trust
for the benefit of C's issue.  In default of C's exercise of the
power, the remainder is to pass to charity.  C dies on February
3, 1997, survived by two children and a sibling, S (who was born
prior to May 15, 1990).  C exercises the power in a manner that
validly extends the trust in favor of C's issue until the later
of May 15, 2070 (80 years from the date the trust was created),
or the death of S.  C's exercise of the power is considered a
transfer by C that is subject to the estate or gift tax because
it may extend the term of the trust beyond the perpetuities
period.
   Example 10.  Exercise of a nongeneral power of appointment.
The facts are the same as in Example 9, except local law provides
that the effect of C's exercise is to extend the term of the
trust until May 15, 2070, whether or not S survives that date.  C
is not treated as having made a transfer to the trust as a result
of the exercise of the power because the exercise of the power
does not extend the term of the trust beyond a period of 90 years
measured from the creation of the trust.  The result would be the
same if the effect of C's exercise is either to extend the term
of the trust until the death of S or to extend the term of the
trust until the first to occur of May 15, 2070, or the death of
S.
   Example 11.  Split-gift transfers.  T transfers $100,000 to an
inter vivos trust that provides T with an annuity payable for ten
years or until T's prior death.  The annuity satisfies the
definition of a qualified interest under section 2702(b).  When
the trust terminates, the corpus is to be paid to T's grandchild,
GC.  T's spouse, S, consents under section 2513 to have the gift
treated as made one-half by S.  Under section 2513, only the
actuarial value of the gift to GC is eligible to be treated as
made one-half by S.  However, because S is treated as the donor
of one-half of the gift to GC, S becomes the transferor of one-
half of the entire trust ($50,000) for purposes of Chapter 13.
   (b) Trust defined--(1) In general.  A trust includes any
arrangement (other than an estate) that has substantially the
same effect as a trust.  Thus, for example, arrangements
involving life estates and remainders, estates for years, and
insurance and annuity contracts are trusts.  Generally, a
transfer as to which the identity of the transferee is contingent
upon the occurrence of an event is a transfer in trust; however,
a transfer of property included in the transferor's gross estate,
as to which the identity of the transferee is contingent upon an
event that must occur within 6 months of the transferor's death,
is not considered a transfer in trust solely by reason of the
existence of the contingency.
   (2) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this paragraph (b):
   Example 1.  Uniform gifts to minors transfers.  T transfers
cash to an account in the name of T's child, C, as custodian for
C's child, GC (who is a minor), under a state statute
substantially similar to the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.  For
purposes of chapter 13, the transfer to the custodial account is
treated as a transfer to a trust.
   Example 2.  Contingent transfers.  T bequeaths $200,000 to T's
child, C, provided that if C does not survive T by more than 6
months, the bequest is payable to T's grandchild, GC.  C dies 4
months after T.  The bequest is not a transfer in trust because
the contingency that determines the recipient of the bequest must
occur within 6 months of T's death.  The bequest to GC is a
direct skip.
   Example 3.  Contingent transfers.  The facts are the same as
in Example 2, except C must survive T by 18 months to take the
bequest.  The bequest is a transfer in trust for purposes of
chapter 13, and the death of C is a taxable termination.
   (c) Trustee defined.  The trustee of a trust is the person
designated as trustee under local law or, if no such person is so
designated, the person in actual or constructive possession of
property held in trust.
   (d) Executor defined.  For purposes of chapter 13, the
executor is the executor or administrator of the decedent's
estate.  However, if no executor or administrator is appointed,
qualified or acting within the United States, the executor is the
fiduciary who is primarily responsible for payment of the
decedent's debts and expenses.  If there is no such executor,
administrator or fiduciary, the executor is the person in actual
or constructive possession of the largest portion of the value of
the decedent's gross estate.
   (e) Interest in trust.  See 26.2612-1(e) for the definition
of interest in trust.
26.2652-2 Special election for qualified terminable interest
property.
   (a) In general.  If an election is made to treat property as
qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) under section
2523(f) or section 2056(b)(7), the person making the election
may, for purposes of chapter 13, elect to treat the property as
if the QTIP election had not been made (reverse QTIP election).
An election under this section is irrevocable.  An election under
this section is not effective unless it is made with respect to
all of the property in the trust to which the QTIP election
applies.  See, however, 26.2654-1(b)(1).  Property that
qualifies for a deduction under section 2056(b)(5) is not
eligible for the election under this section.
   (b) Time and manner of making election.  An election under
this section is made on the return on which the QTIP election is
made.  If a protective QTIP election is made, no election under
this section is effective unless a protective reverse QTIP
election is also made.
   (c) Transitional rule.  If a reverse QTIP election is made
with respect to a trust prior to December 27, 1995, and GST
exemption has been allocated to that trust, the transferor (or
the transferor's executor) may elect to treat the trust as two
separate trusts, one of which has a zero inclusion ratio by
reason of the transferor's GST exemption previously allocated to
the trust.  The separate trust with the zero inclusion ratio
consists of that fractional share of the value of the entire
trust equal to the value of the nontax portion of the trust under
26.2642-4(a).  The reverse QTIP election is treated as applying
only to the trust with the zero inclusion ratio.  An election
under this paragraph (c) is made by attaching a statement to a
copy of the return on which the reverse QTIP election was made
under section 2652(a)(3).  The statement must indicate that an
election is being made to treat the trust as two separate trusts
and must identify the values of the two separate trusts.  The
statement is to be filed in the same place in which the original
return was filed and must be filed before June 24, 1996.  A trust
subject to the election described in this paragraph is treated as
a trust that was created by two transferors.  See 26.2654-
1(a)(2) for special rules involving trusts with multiple
transferors.
   (d) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section:
   Example 1.  Special (reverse QTIP) election under section
2652(a)(3).  T transfers $1,000,000 to a trust providing that all
trust income is to be paid to T's spouse, S, for S's lifetime.
On S's death, the trust principal is payable to GC, a grandchild
of S and T.  T elects to treat all of the transfer as a transfer
of QTIP and also makes the reverse QTIP election for all of the
property.  Because of the reverse QTIP election, T continues to
be treated as the transferor of the property after S's death for
purposes of chapter 13.  A taxable termination rather than a
direct skip occurs on S's death.
   Example 2.  Election under transition rule.  In 1994, T died
leaving $4 million in trust for the benefit of T's surviving
spouse, S.  On January 16, 1995, T's executor filed T's Form 706
on which the executor elects to treat the entire trust as
qualified terminable interest property.  The executor also makes
a reverse QTIP election.  The reverse QTIP election is effective
with respect to the entire trust even though T's executor could
allocate only $1 million of GST exemption to the trust.  T's
executor may elect to treat the trust as two separate trusts, one
having a value of 25% of the value of the single trust and an
inclusion ratio of zero, but only if the election is made prior
to June 24, 1996.  If the executor makes the transitional
election, the other separate trust, having a value of 75% of the
value of the single trust and an inclusion ratio of one, is not
treated as subject to the reverse QTIP election.
   Example 3.  Denominator of the applicable fraction of QTIP
trust.  T bequeaths $1,500,000 to a trust in which T's surviving
spouse, S, receives an income interest for life.  Upon the death
of S, the property is to remain in trust for the benefit of C,
the child of T and S.  Upon C's death, the trust is to terminate
and the trust property paid to the descendants of C.  The bequest
qualifies for the estate tax marital deduction under section
2056(b)(7) as QTIP.  The executor does not make the reverse QTIP
election under section 2652(a)(3).  As a result, S becomes the
transferor of the trust at S's death when the value of the
property in the QTIP trust is included in S's gross estate under
section 2044.  For purposes of computing the applicable fraction
with respect to the QTIP trust upon S's death, the denominator of
the fraction is reduced by any Federal estate tax (whether
imposed under section 2001, 2101 or 2056A(b)) and State death tax
attributable to the trust property that is actually recovered
from the trust.
26.2653-1 Taxation of multiple skips.
   (a) General rule.  If property is held in trust immediately
after a GST, solely for purposes of determining whether future
events involve a skip person, the transferor is thereafter deemed
to occupy the generation immediately above the highest generation
of any person holding an interest in the trust immediately after
the transfer.  If no person holds an interest in the trust
immediately after the GST, the transferor is treated as occupying
the generation above the highest generation of any person in
existence at the time of the GST who then occupies the highest
generation level of any person who may subsequently hold an
interest in the trust.  See 26.2612-1(e) for rules determining
when a person has an interest in property held in trust.
   (b) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section:
   Example 1.  T transfers property to an irrevocable trust for
the benefit of T's grandchild, GC, and great-grandchild, GGC.
During GC's life, the trust income may be distributed to GC and
GGC in the trustee's absolute discretion.  At GC's death, the
trust property passes to GGC.  Both GC and GGC have an interest
in the trust for purposes of chapter 13.  The transfer by T to
the trust is a direct skip, and the property is held in trust
immediately after the transfer.  After the direct skip, the
transferor is treated as being one generation above GC, the
highest generation individual having an interest in the trust.
Therefore, GC is no longer a skip person and distributions to GC
are not taxable distributions.  However, because GGC occupies a
generation that is two generations below the deemed generation of
T, GGC is a skip person and distributions of trust income to GGC
are taxable distributions.
   Example 2.  T transfers property to an irrevocable trust
providing that the income is to be paid to T's child, C, for
life.  At C's death, the trust income is to be accumulated for 10
years and added to principal.  At the end of the 10-year
accumulation period, the trust income is to be paid to T's
grandchild, GC, for life.  Upon GC's death, the trust property is
to be paid to T's great-grandchild, GGC, or to GGC's estate.  A
GST occurs at C's death.  Immediately after C's death and during
the 10-year accumulation period, no person has an interest in the
trust within the meaning of section 2652(c) and
26.2612-1(e) because no one can receive current distributions of
income or principal.  Immediately after C's death, T is treated
as occupying the generation above the generation of GC (the trust
beneficiary in existence at the time of the GST who then occupies
the highest generation level of any person who may subsequently
hold an interest in the trust).  Thus, subsequent income
distributions to GC are not taxable distributions.
26.2654-1 Certain trusts treated as separate trusts.
   (a) Single trust treated as separate trusts--(1) Substantially
separate and independent shares--(i) In general.  If a single
trust consists solely of substantially separate and independent
shares for different beneficiaries, the share attributable to
each beneficiary (or group of beneficiaries) is treated as a
separate trust for purposes of chapter 13.  The phrase
"substantially separate and independent shares" generally has the
same meaning as provided in 1.663(c)-3 of this chapter.
However, a portion of a trust is not a separate share unless such
share exists from and at all times after the creation of the
trust.  For purposes of this paragraph (a)(1), a trust is treated
as created at the date of death of the grantor if the trust is
includible in its entirety in the grantor's gross estate for
Federal estate tax purposes.  Further, treatment of a single
trust as separate trusts under this paragraph (a)(1) does not
permit treatment of those portions as separate trusts for
purposes of filing returns and payment of tax or for purposes of
computing any other tax imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
Also, additions to, and distributions from, such trusts are
allocated pro rata among the separate trusts, unless the
governing instrument expressly provides otherwise.
   (ii) Certain pecuniary amounts.  For purposes of this section,
if a person holds the current right to receive a mandatory (i.e.,
nondiscretionary and noncontingent) payment of a pecuniary amount
at the death of the transferor from an inter vivos trust that is
includible in the transferor's gross estate, or a testamentary
trust, the pecuniary amount is a separate and independent share
if--
   (A) The trustee is required to pay appropriate interest (as
defined in 26.2642-2(b)(4)(i) and (ii)) to the person; and
   (B) If the pecuniary amount is payable in kind on the basis of
value other than the date of distribution value of the assets,
the trustee is required to allocate assets to the pecuniary
payment in a manner that fairly reflects net appreciation or
depreciation in the value of the assets in the fund available to
pay the pecuniary amount measured from the date of death to the
date of payment.
   (2) Multiple transferors with respect to single trust--(i) In
general.  If there is more than one transferor with respect to a
trust, the portions of the trust attributable to the different
transferors are treated as separate trusts for purposes of
chapter 13.  Treatment of a single trust as separate trusts under
this paragraph (a)(2) does not permit treatment of those portions
as separate trusts for purposes of filing returns and payment of
tax or for purposes of computing any other tax imposed under the
Internal Revenue Code.  Also, additions to, and distributions
from, such trusts are allocated pro rata among the separate
trusts unless otherwise expressly provided in the governing
instrument.
   (ii) Addition by a transferor.  If an individual makes an
addition to a trust of which the individual is not the sole
transferor, the portion of the single trust attributable to each
separate trust is determined by multiplying the fair market value
of the single trust immediately after the contribution by a
fraction.  The numerator of the fraction is the value of the
separate trust immediately after the contribution.  The
denominator of the fraction is the fair market value of all the
property in the single trust immediately after the transfer.
   (3) Severance of a single trust.  A single trust treated as
separate trusts under paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section
may be divided at any time into separate trusts to reflect that
treatment.  For this purpose, the rules of paragraph
(b)(1)(ii)(C) of this section apply with respect to the severance
and funding of the severed trusts.
   (4) Allocation of exemption--(i) In general.  With respect to
a separate share treated as a separate trust under paragraph
(a)(1) or (2) of this section, an individual's GST exemption is
allocated to the separate trust.  See 26.2632-1 for rules
concerning the allocation of GST exemption.
   (ii) Automatic allocation to direct skips.  If the transfer is
a direct skip to a trust that occurs during the transferor's
lifetime and is treated as a transfer to separate trusts under
paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section, the transferor's GST
exemption not previously allocated is automatically allocated on
a pro rata basis among the separate trusts.  The transferor may
prevent an automatic allocation of GST exemption to a separate
share of a single trust by describing on a timely-filed United
States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form
709) the transfer and the extent to which the automatic
allocation is not to apply to a particular share.  See 26.2632-
1(b) for rules for avoiding the automatic allocation of GST
exemption.
   (5) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
principles of this section (a):
   Example 1.  Separate shares as separate trusts.  T transfers
$100,000 to a trust under which income is to be paid in equal
shares for 10 years to T's child, C, and T's grandchild, GC (or
their respective estates).  The trust does not permit
distributions of principal during the term of the trust.  At the
end of the 10-year term, the trust principal is to be distributed
to C and GC in equal shares.  The shares of C and GC in the trust
are separate and independent and, therefore, are treated as
separate trusts.  The result would not be the same if the trust
permitted distributions of principal unless the distributions
could only be made from a one-half separate share of the initial
trust principal and the distributee's future rights with respect
to the trust are correspondingly reduced.  T may allocate part of
T's GST exemption under section 2632(a) to the share held for the
benefit of GC.
   Example 2.  Separate share rule inapplicable.  The facts are
the same as in Example 1, except the trustee holds the
discretionary power to distribute the income in any proportion
between C and GC during the last year of the trust.  The shares
of C and GC in the trust are not separate and independent shares
throughout the entire term of the trust and, therefore, are not
treated as separate trusts for purposes of chapter 13.
  Example 3.  Pecuniary payment as separate share.  T creates a
lifetime revocable trust providing that on T's death $500,000 is
payable to T's spouse, S, with the balance of the principal to be
held for the benefit of T's grandchildren.  The value of the
trust is includible in T's gross estate upon T's death.  Under
the terms of the trust, the payment to S is required to be made
in cash, and under local law S is entitled to receive interest on
the payment at an annual rate of 6 percent, commencing
immediately upon T's death.  For purposes of chapter 13, the
trust is treated as created at T's death, and the $500,000
payable to S from the trust is treated as a separate share.  The
result would be the same if the payment to S could be satisfied
using noncash assets at their value on the date of distribution.
Further, the result would be the same if the decedent's probate
estate poured over to the revocable trust on the decedent's death
and was then distributed in accordance with the terms of the
trust.
   Example 4.  Pecuniary payment not treated as separate share.
The facts are the same as in Example 3, except the bequest to S
is to be paid in noncash assets valued at their values as finally
determined for Federal estate tax purposes.  Neither the trust
instrument nor local law requires that the assets distributed in
satisfaction of the bequest fairly reflect net appreciation or
depreciation in all the assets from which the bequest may be
funded.  S's $500,000 bequest is not treated as a separate share
and the trust is treated as a single trust for purposes of
chapter 13.
   Example 5.  Multiple transferors to single trust.  A transfers
$100,000 to an irrevocable generation-skipping trust; B
simultaneously transfers $50,000 to the same trust.  As of the
time of the transfers, the single trust is treated as two trusts
for purposes of chapter 13.  Because A contributed 2/3 of the
value of the initial corpus, 2/3 of the single trust principal is
treated as a separate trust created by A.  Similarly, because B
contributed 1/3 of the value of the initial corpus, 1/3 of the
single trust is treated as a separate trust created by B.  A or B
may allocate their GST exemption under section 2632(a) to the
respective separate trusts.
   Example 6.  Additional contributions.  A transfers $100,000 to
an irrevocable generation-skipping trust; B simultaneously
transfers $50,000 to the same trust.  When the value of the
single trust has increased to $180,000, A contributes an
additional $60,000 to the trust.  At the time of the additional
contribution, the portion of the single trust attributable to
each grantor's separate trust must be redetermined.  The portion
of the single trust attributable to A's separate trust
immediately after the contribution is 3/4 (((2/3 x $180,000) +
$60,000)/ $240,000).  The portion attributable to B's separate
trust after A's addition is 1/4.
   Example 7.  Distributions from a separate share.  The facts
are the same as in Example 6, except that, after A's second
contribution, $50,000 is distributed to a beneficiary of the
trust.  Absent a provision in the trust instrument that charges
the distribution against the contribution of either A or B, 3/4
of the distribution is treated as made from the separate trust of
which A is the transferor and 1/4 from the separate trust of
which B is the transferor.
   Example 8.  Separate share rule inapplicable.  T creates an
irrevocable trust that provides the trustee with the
discretionary power to distribute income or corpus to T's
children and grandchildren.  The trust provides that, when T's
youngest child reaches age 21, the trust will be divided into
separate shares, one share for each child of T.  The income from
a respective child's share will be paid to the child during the
child's life with the remainder passing to such child's children
(grandchildren of T).  The separate shares that come into
existence when the youngest child reaches age 21 will not be
recognized as separate trusts for purposes of Chapter 13 because
the shares did not exist from and at all times after the creation
of the trust.  Any allocation of GST exemption to the trust
either before or after T's youngest child reaches age 21 will
apply with respect to the entire trust.  Thus, the inclusion
ratio will be the same with respect to any distribution from the
trust or the separate shares.  The result would be the same if
the trust instrument provided that the trust was to be divided
into separate trusts when T's youngest child reached age 21.
   (b) Division of a trust included in the gross estate--(1) In
general.  The severance of a trust that is included in the
transferor's gross estate (or created under the transferor's
will) into two or more trusts is recognized for purposes of
chapter 13 if--
   (i) The trust is severed pursuant to a direction in the
governing instrument providing that the trust is to be divided
upon the death of the transferor; or
   (ii) The governing instrument does not require or otherwise
direct severance but the trust is severed pursuant to
discretionary authority granted either under the governing
instrument or under local law; and
   (A) The terms of each of the new trusts provide in the
aggregate for the same succession of interests and beneficiaries
as are provided in the original trust;
   (B) The severance occurs (or a reformation proceeding, if
required, is commenced) prior to the date prescribed for filing
the Federal estate tax return (including extensions actually
granted) for the estate of the transferor; and
   (C) Either--
   (1) The new trusts are severed on a fractional basis.  If
severed on a fractional basis, the separate trusts need not be
funded with a pro rata portion of each asset held by the
undivided trust.  The trusts may be funded on a nonpro rata basis
provided funding is based on either the fair market value of the
assets on the date of funding or in a manner that fairly reflects
the net appreciation or depreciation in the value of the assets
measured from the valuation date to the date of funding; or
   (2) If the severance is required (by the terms of the
governing instrument) to be made on the basis of a pecuniary
amount, the pecuniary payment is satisfied in a manner that would
meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section if
it were paid to an individual.
   (2) Special rule.  If a court order severing the trust has not
been issued at the time the Federal estate tax return is filed,
the executor must indicate on a statement attached to the return
that a proceeding has been commenced to sever the trust and
describe the manner in which the trust is proposed to be severed.
A copy of the petition or other instrument used to commence the
proceeding must also be attached to the return.  If the governing
instrument of a trust or local law authorizes the severance of
the trust, a severance pursuant to that authorization is treated
as meeting the requirement of paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) of this
section if the executor indicates on the Federal estate tax
return that separate trusts will be created (or funded) and
clearly sets forth the manner in which the trust is to be severed
and the separate trusts funded.
   (3) Allocation of exemption.  An individual's GST exemption
under 2632 may be allocated to the separate trusts created
pursuant to this section at the discretion of the executor or
trustee.
   (4)  Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section (b):
   Example 1.  Severance of single trust.  T's will establishes a
testamentary trust providing that income is to be paid to T's
spouse for life.  At the spouse's death, one-half of the corpus
is to be paid to T's child, C, or C's estate (if C fails to
survive the spouse) and one-half of the corpus is to be paid to
T's grandchild, GC, or GC's estate (if GC fails to survive the
spouse).  If the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section
are otherwise satisfied, T's executor may divide the testamentary
trust equally into two separate trusts, one trust providing an
income interest to spouse for life with remainder to C, and the
other trust with an income interest to spouse for life with
remainder to GC.  Furthermore, if the requirements of paragraph
(b) of this section are satisfied, the executor or trustee may
further divide the trust for the benefit of GC.  GST exemption
may be allocated to any of the divided trusts.
   Example 2.  Severance of revocable trust.  T creates an inter
vivos revocable trust providing that, at T's death and after
payment of all taxes and administration expenses, the remaining
corpus will be divided into two trusts.  One trust, for the
benefit of T's spouse, is to be funded with the smallest amount
that, if qualifying for the marital deduction, will reduce the
estate tax to zero.  The other trust, for the benefit of T's
descendants, is to be funded with the balance of the revocable
trust corpus.  The trust corpus is includible in T's gross
estate.  Each trust is recognized as a separate trust for
purposes of chapter 13.
26.2662-1  Generation-skipping transfer tax return requirements.
   (a) In general.  Chapter 13 imposes a tax on generation-
skipping transfers (as defined in section 2611).  The
requirements relating to the return of tax depend on the type of
generation-skipping transfer involved.  This section contains
rules for filing the required tax return.  Paragraph (c)(2) of
this section provides special rules concerning the return
requirements for generation-skipping transfers pursuant to
certain trust arrangements (as defined in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
this section), such as life insurance policies and annuities.
     (b) Form of return--(1) Taxable distributions.  Form
706GS(D) must be filed in accordance with its instructions for
any taxable distribution (as defined in section 2612(b)).  The
trust involved in a transfer described in the preceding sentence
must file Form 706GS(D-1) in accordance with its instructions.  A
copy of Form 706GS(D-1) shall be sent to each distributee.
     (2) Taxable terminations.  Form 706GS(T) must be filed in
accordance with its instructions for any taxable termination (as
defined in section 2612(a)).
     (3) Direct skip--(i) Inter vivos direct skips.  Form 709
must be filed in accordance with its instructions for any direct
skip (as defined in section 2612(c)) that is subject to chapter
12 and occurs during the life of the transferor.
     (ii) Direct skips occurring at death--(A) In general.  Form
706 or Form 706NA must be filed in accordance with its
instructions for any direct skips (as defined in section 2612(c))
that are subject to chapter 11 and occur at the death of the
decedent.
     (B) Direct skips payable from a trust.  Schedule R-1 of Form
706 must be filed in accordance with its instructions for any
direct skip from a trust if such direct skip is subject to
chapter 11.  See paragraph (c)(2) of this section for special
rules relating to the person liable for tax and required to make
the return under certain circumstances.
     (c) Person liable for tax and required to make return--(1)
In general.  Except as otherwise provided in this section, the
following person is liable for the tax imposed by section 2601
and must make the required tax return--
     (i) The transferee in a taxable distribution (as defined in
section 2612(b));
     (ii) The trustee in the case of a taxable termination (as
defined in section 2612(a));
     (iii) The transferor (as defined in section 2652(a)(1)(B))
in the case of an inter vivos direct skip (as defined in section
2612(c));
     (iv) The trustee in the case of a direct skip from a trust
or with respect to property that continues to be held in trust;
or
     (v) The executor in the case of a direct skip (other than a
direct skip described in paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section) if
the transfer is subject to chapter 11.  See paragraph (c)(2) of
this section for special rules relating to direct skips to or
from certain trust arrangements (as defined in paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section).
     (2) Special rule for direct skips occurring at death with
respect to property held in trust arrangements--(i) In general.
In the case of certain property held in a trust arrangement (as
defined in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section) at the
date of death of the transferor, the person who is required to
make the return and who is liable for the tax imposed by chapter
13 is determined under paragraphs (c)(2)(iii) and (iv) of this
section.
     (ii) Trust arrangement defined.  For purposes of this
section, the term trust arrangement includes any arrangement
(other than an estate) which, although not an explicit trust, has
the same effect as an explicit trust.  For purposes of this
section, the term "explicit trust" means a trust described in
301.7701-4(a).
     (iii) Executor's liability in the case of transfers with
respect to decedents dying on or after June 24, 1996, if the
transfer is less than $250,000.  In the case of a direct skip
occurring at death, the executor of the decedent's estate is
liable for the tax imposed on that direct skip by chapter 13 and
is required to file Form 706 or Form 706NA (and not Schedule R-1
of Form 706) if, at the date of the decedent's death--
     (A) The property involved in the direct skip is held in a
trust arrangement; and
     (B) The total value of the property involved in direct skips
with respect to the trustee of that trust arrangement is less
than $250,000.
     (iv) Executor's liability in the case of transfers with
respect to decedents dying prior to June 24, 1996, if the
transfer is less than $100,000.  In the case of a direct skip
occurring at death with respect to a decedent dying prior to June
24, 1996, the rule in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section that
imposes liability upon the executor applies only if the property
involved in the direct skip with respect to the trustee of the
trust arrangement, in the aggregate, is less than $100,000.
     (v) Executor's right of recovery.  In cases where the rules
of paragraphs (c)(2)(iii) and (iv) of this section impose
liability for the generation-skipping transfer tax on the
executor, the executor is entitled to recover from the trustee
(if the property continues to be held in trust) or from the
recipient of the property (in the case of a transfer from a
trust), the generation-skipping transfer tax attributable to the
transfer.
     (vi)  Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
application of this paragraph (c)(2) with respect to decedents
dying on or after June 24, 1996:
     Example 1.  Insurance proceeds less than $250,000.  On
August 1, 1997, T, the insured under an insurance policy, died.
The proceeds ($200,000) were includible in T's gross estate for
Federal estate tax purposes.  T's grandchild, GC, was named the
sole beneficiary of the policy.  The insurance policy is treated
as a trust under section 2652(b)(1), and the payment of the
proceeds to GC is a transfer from a trust for purposes of chapter
13.  Therefore, the payment of the proceeds to GC is a direct
skip.  Since the proceeds from the policy ($200,000) are less
than $250,000, the executor is liable for the tax imposed by
chapter 13 and is required to file Form 706.
     Example 2.  Aggregate insurance proceeds of $250,000 or
more.  Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except T is the
insured under two insurance policies issued by the same insurance
company.  The proceeds ($150,000) from each policy are includible
in T's gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes.  T's
grandchild, GC1, was named the sole beneficiary of Policy 1, and
T's other grandchild, GC2, was named the sole beneficiary of
Policy 2.  GC1 and GC2 are skip persons (as defined in section
2613).  Therefore, the payments of the proceeds are direct skips.
Since the total value of the policies ($300,000) exceeds
$250,000, the insurance company is liable for the tax imposed by
chapter 13 and is required to file Schedule R-1 of Form 706.
     Example 3.  Insurance proceeds of $250,000 or more held by
insurance company.  On August 1, 1997, T, the insured under an
insurance policy, dies.  The policy provides that the insurance
company shall make monthly payments of $750 to GC, T's
grandchild, for life with the remainder payable to T's
great grandchild, GGC.  The face value of the policy is $300,000.
Since the proceeds continue to be held by the insurance company
(the trustee), the proceeds are treated as if they were
transferred to a trust for purposes of chapter 13.  The trust is
a skip person (as defined in section 2613(a)(2)) and the transfer
is a direct skip.  Since the total value of the policy
($300,000) exceeds $250,000, the insurance company is liable for
the tax imposed by chapter 13 and is required to file Schedule
R-1 of Form 706.
     Example 4.  Insurance proceeds less than $250,000 held by
insurance company.  Assume the same facts as in Example 3, except
the policy provides that the insurance company shall make monthly
payments of $500 to GC and that the face value of the policy is
$200,000.  The transfer is a transfer to a trust for purposes of
chapter 13.  However, since the total value of the policy
($200,000) is less than $250,000, the executor is liable for the
tax imposed by chapter 13 and is required to file Form 706.
   Example 5.  On August 1, 1997, A, the insured under a life
insurance policy, dies.  The insurance proceeds on A's life that
are payable under policies issued by Company X are in the
aggregate amount of $200,000 and are includible in A's gross
estate.  Because the proceeds are includible in A's gross estate,
the generation-skipping transfer that occurs upon A's death, if
any, will be a direct skip rather than a taxable distribution or
a taxable termination.  Accordingly, because the aggregate amount
of insurance proceeds with respect to Company X is less than
$250,000, Company X may pay the proceeds without regard to
whether the beneficiary is a skip person in relation to the
decedent-transferor.
     (3) Limitation on personal liability of trustee.  Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, a trustee is
not personally liable for any increases in the tax imposed by
section 2601 which is attributable to the fact that--
     (i) A transfer is made to the trust during the life of the
transferor for which a gift tax return is not filed; or
     (ii) The inclusion ratio with respect to the trust,
determined by reference to the transferor's gift tax return, is
erroneous, the actual inclusion ratio being greater than the
reported inclusion ratio.
     (iii) This paragraph (c)(3) does not apply if the trustee
has or is deemed to have knowledge of facts sufficient to
reasonably conclude that a gift tax return was required to be
filed or that the inclusion ratio is erroneous.  A trustee is
deemed to have knowledge of such facts if the trustee's agent,
employee, partner, or co-trustee has knowledge of such facts.
     (4) Exceptions--(i) Legal or mental incapacity.  If a
distributee is legally or mentally incapable of making a return,
the return may be made for the distributee by the distributee's
guardian or, if no guardian has been appointed, by a person
charged with the care of the distributee's person or property.
     (ii) Returns made by fiduciaries.  See section 6012(b) for a
fiduciary's responsibilities regarding the returns of decedents,
returns of persons under a disability, returns of estates and
trusts, and returns made by joint fiduciaries.
     (d) Time and manner of filing return--(1) In general.  Forms
706, 706NA, 706GS(D), 706GS(D-1), 706GS(T), 709, and Schedule R-1
of Form 706 must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service
office with which an estate or gift tax return of the transferor
must be filed.  The return shall be filed--
     (i) Direct skip.  In the case of a direct skip, on or before
the date on which an estate or gift tax return is required to be
filed with respect to the transfer (see section 6075(b)(3)); and
     (ii) Other transfers.  In all other cases, on or before the
15th day of the 4th month after the close of the calendar year in
which such transfer occurs.  See paragraph (d)(2) of this section
for an exception to this rule when an election is made under
section 2624(c) to value property included in certain taxable
terminations in accordance with section 2032.
     (2) Exception for alternative valuation of taxable
termination.  In the case of a taxable termination with respect
to which an election is made under section 2624(c) to value
property in accordance with section 2032, a Form 706GS(T) must be
filed on or before the 15th day of the 4th month after the close
of the calendar year in which the taxable termination occurred,
or on or before the 10th month following the month in which the
death that resulted in the taxable termination occurred,
whichever is later.
     (e) Place for filing returns.  See section 6091 for the
place for filing any return, declaration, statement, or other
document, or copies thereof, required by chapter 13.
     (f) Lien on property.  The liens imposed under sections
6324, 6324A, and 6324B are applicable with respect to the tax
imposed under chapter 13.  Thus, a lien under section 6324 is
imposed in the amount of the tax imposed by section 2601 on all
property transferred in a generation-skipping transfer until the
tax is fully paid or becomes uncollectible by reason of lapse of
time.  The lien attaches at the time of the generation-skipping
transfer and is in addition to the lien for taxes under section
6321.
26.2663-1 Recapture tax under section 2032A.
   See 26.2642-4(a)(4) for rules relating to the recomputation
of the applicable fraction and the imposition of additional GST
tax, if additional estate tax is imposed under section 2032A.
26.2663-2 Application of chapter 13 to transfers by
nonresidents not citizens of the United States.
   (a) In general.  This section provides rules for applying
chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code to transfers by a
transferor who is a nonresident not a citizen of the United
States (NRA transferor).  For purposes of this section, an
individual is a resident or citizen of the United States if that
individual is a resident or citizen of the United States under
the rules of chapter 11 or 12 of the Internal Revenue Code, as
the case may be.  Every NRA transferor is allowed a GST exemption
of $1,000,000.  See 26.2632-1 regarding the allocation of the
exemption.
   (b) Transfers subject to chapter 13--(1) Direct skips.  A
transfer by a NRA transferor is a direct skip subject to chapter
13 only to the extent that the transfer is subject to the Federal
estate or gift tax within the meaning of 26.2652-1(a)(2).  See
26.2612-1(a) for the definition of direct skip.
   (2) Taxable distributions and taxable terminations.  Chapter
13 applies to a taxable distribution or a taxable termination to
the extent that the initial transfer of property to the trust by
a NRA transferor, whether during life or at death, was subject to
the Federal estate or gift tax within the meaning of 26.2652-
1(a)(2).  See 26.2612-1(b) for the definition of a taxable
termination and 26.2612-1(c) for the definition of a taxable
distribution.
   (c) Trusts funded in part with property subject to chapter 13
and in part with property not subject to chapter 13--(1) In
general.  If a single trust created by a NRA transferor is in
part subject to chapter 13 under the rules of paragraph (b) of
this section and in part not subject to chapter 13, the
applicable fraction with respect to the trust is determined as of
the date of the transfer, except as provided in paragraph (c)(3)
of this section.
   (i) Numerator of applicable fraction.  The numerator of the
applicable fraction is the sum of the amount of GST exemption
allocated to the trust (if any) plus the value of the nontax
portion of the trust.
   (ii) Denominator of applicable fraction.  The denominator of
the applicable fraction is the value of the property transferred
to the trust reduced as provided in 26.2642-1(c).
   (2)  Nontax portion of the trust.  The nontax portion of a
trust is a fraction, the numerator of which is the value of
property not subject to chapter 13 determined as of the date of
the initial completed transfer to the trust, and the denominator
of which is the value of the entire trust.  For example, T, a NRA
transferor, transfers property that has a value of $1,000 to a
generation-skipping trust.  Of the property transferred to the
trust, property having a value of $200 is subject to chapter 13
and property having a value of $800 is not subject to chapter 13.
The nontax portion is .8 ($800 (the value of the property not
subject to chapter 13) over $1,000 (the total value of the
property transferred to the trust)).
   (3)  Special rule with respect to the estate tax inclusion
period.  For purposes of this section, the provisions of
26.2632-1(c), providing rules applicable in the case of an
estate tax inclusion period (ETIP), apply only if the property
transferred by the NRA transferor is subsequently included in the
transferor's gross estate.  If the property is not subsequently
included in the gross estate, then the nontax portion of the
trust and the applicable fraction are determined as of the date
of the initial transfer.  If the property is subsequently
included in the gross estate, then the nontax portion and the
applicable fraction are determined as of the date of death.
        (d) Examples.  The following examples illustrate the
provisions of this section.  In each example T, a NRA, is the
transferor; C is T's child; and GC is C's child and a grandchild
of T:
   Example 1.  Direct transfer to skip person.  T transfers
property to GC in a transfer that is subject to Federal gift tax
under chapter 12 within the meaning of 26.2652-1(a)(2).  At the
time of the transfer, C and GC are NRAs.  T's transfer is subject
to chapter 13 because the transfer is subject to gift tax under
chapter 12.
   Example 2.  Transfers of both U.S. and foreign situs property.
(i) T's will established a testamentary trust for the benefit of
C and GC.  The trust was funded with stock in a publicly traded
U.S. corporation having a value on the date of T's death of
$100,000, and property not situated in the United States (and
therefore not subject to estate tax) having a value on the date
of T's death of $400,000.
   (ii) On a timely filed estate tax return (Form 706NA), the
executor of T's estate allocates $50,000 of GST exemption under
section 2632(a) to the trust.  The numerator of the applicable
fraction is $450,000, the sum of $50,000 (the amount of exemption
allocated to the trust) plus $400,000 (the value of the nontax
portion of the trust (4/5 x $500,000)).  The denominator is
$500,000.  Hence, the applicable fraction with respect to the
trust is .9 ($450,000/$500,000), and the inclusion ratio is
.1 (1 - 9/10).
   Example 3.  Inter vivos transfer of U.S. and foreign situs
property to a trust and a timely allocation of GST exemption.  T
establishes a trust providing that trust income is payable to T's
child for life and the remainder is to be paid to T's grandchild.
T transfers property to the trust that has a value of $100,000
and is subject to chapter 13.  T also transfers property to the
trust that has a value of $300,000 but is not subject to chapter
13.  T allocates $100,000 of exemption to the trust on a timely
filed United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax
Return (Form 709).  The applicable fraction with respect to the
trust is 1, determined as follows: $300,000 (the value of the
nontax portion of the trust) plus $100,000 (the exemption
allocated to the trust)/ $400,000 (the total value of the
property transferred to the trust).
   Example 4.  Inter vivos transfer of U.S. and foreign situs
property to a trust and a late allocation of GST exemption.
(i) In 1996, T transfers $500,000 of property to an inter vivos
trust the terms of which provide that income is payable to C, for
life, with the remainder to GC.  The property transferred to the
trust consists of property subject to chapter 13 that has a value
of $400,000 on the date of the transfer and property not subject
to chapter 13 that has a value of $100,000.  T does not allocate
GST exemption to the trust.  On the transfer date, the nontax
portion of the trust is .2 ($100,000/$500,000) and the applicable
fraction is also .2 determined as follows: $100,000 (the value of
the nontax portion of the trust)/$500,000 (the value of the
property transferred to the trust).
   (ii) In 1999, when the value of the trust is $800,000, T
allocates $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust.  The applicable
fraction of the trust must be recomputed.  The numerator of the
applicable fraction is $260,000 ($100,000 (the amount of GST
exemption allocated to the trust)) plus $160,000 (the value of
the nontax portion of the trust as of the date of allocation (.2
x $800,000)).  The denominator of the applicable fraction is
$800,000.  Accordingly, the applicable fraction with respect to
the trust after the allocation is .325 ($260,000/$800,000) and
the inclusion ratio is .675 (1 - .325).
   Example 5.  Taxable termination.  The facts are the same as in
Example 4 except that, in 2006, when the value of the property is
$1,200,000, C dies and the trust corpus is distributed to GC.
The termination is a taxable termination.  If no further GST
exemption has been allocated to the trust, the applicable
fraction remains .325 and the inclusion ratio remains .675.
   Example 6.  Estate Tax Inclusion Period.  (i) T transferred
property to an inter vivos trust the terms of which provided T
with an annuity payable for 10 years or until T's prior death.
The annuity satisfies the definition of a qualified interest
under section 2702(b).  The trust also provided that, at the end
of the trust term, the remainder will pass to GC or GC's estate.
The property transferred to the trust consisted of property
subject to chapter 13 that has a value of $100,000 and property
not subject to chapter 13 that has a value of $400,000.  T
allocated $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust.  If T dies
within the 10 year period, the value of the trust principal will
be subject to inclusion in T's gross estate to the extent
provided in sections 2103 and 2104(b).  Accordingly, the ETIP
rule under paragraph (c)(3) of this section applies.
   (ii) In year 6 of the trust term, T died.  At T's death, the
trust corpus had a value of $800,000, and $500,000 was includible
in T's gross estate as provided in sections 2103 and 2104(b).
Thus, $500,000 of the trust corpus is subject to chapter 13 and
$300,000 is not subject to chapter 13.  The $100,000 GST
exemption allocation is effective as of T's date of death.  Also,
the nontax portion of the trust and the applicable fraction are
determined as of T's date of death.  In this case, the nontax
portion of the trust is .375, determined as follows: $300,000
(the value of the trust not subject to chapter 13)/ $800,000 (the
value of the trust).  The numerator of the applicable fraction is
$400,000, determined as follows: $100,000 (GST exemption
previously allocated to the trust) plus $300,000 (the value of
the nontax portion of the trust).  The denominator of the
applicable fraction is $800,000.  Thus, the applicable fraction
with respect to the trust is .50, unless additional exemption is
allocated to the trust by T's executor or the automatic
allocation rules of 26.2632-1(d)(2) apply.
   Example 7.  The facts are the same as in Example 6 except that
T survives the termination date of T's retained annuity and the
trust corpus is distributed to GC.  Since the trust was not
included in T's gross estate, the ETIP rules do not apply.
Accordingly, the nontax portion of the trust and the applicable
fraction are determined as of the date of the transfer to the
trust.  The nontax portion of the trust is .80
($400,000/$500,000).  The numerator of the applicable fraction is
$500,000 determined as follows: $100,000 (GST exemption allocated
to the trust) plus $400,000 (the value of the nontax portion of
the trust).  Accordingly, the applicable fraction is 1, and the
inclusion ratio is zero.
   (e) Transitional rule for allocations for transfers made
before December 27, 1995.  If a NRA made a GST (inter vivos or
testamentary) after December 23, 1992, and before December 27,
1995, that is subject to chapter 13 (within the meaning of
26.2663-2), the NRA will be treated as having made a timely
allocation of GST exemption to the transfer in a calendar year in
the order prescribed in section 2632(c).  Thus, a NRA's unused
GST exemption will initially be treated as allocated to any
direct skips made during the calendar year and then to any trusts
with respect to which the NRA made transfers during the same
calendar year and from which a taxable distribution or a taxable
termination may occur.  Allocations within the above categories
are made in the order in which the transfers occur.  Allocations
among simultaneous transfers within the same category are made
pursuant to the principles of section 2632(c)(2).  This
transitional allocation rule will not apply if the NRA
transferor, or the executor of the NRA's estate, as the case may
be, elected to have an automatic allocation of GST exemption not
apply by describing on a timely-filed Form 709 for the year of
the transfer, or a timely filed Form 706NA, the details of the
transfer and the extent to which the allocation was not to apply.
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
     Par.  2.  The authority citation for part 301 continues to
read in part as follows:
     Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805.* * *
     Par.  3.  Section 301.9100-7T is amended as follows:
     a.  Paragraph (a)(1) is amended in the table by removing
both entries for "1431(a)".
     b.  Paragraph (a)(4)(i) is amended in the table by removing
the entry "1431(a)".
     c.  Paragraph (a)(4)(iii) is revised to read as follows:
301.9100-7T  Time and manner of making certain elections under
the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
     (a)  * * *
     (4)  * * *
     (iii) Freely revocable election.  The election described in
this section under Act section 311(d)(2) is freely revocable.
* * * * *
PART 602--OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
     Par.  4.  The authority citation for part 602 continues to
read as follows:
     Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
     Par.  5.  In 602.101, paragraph (c) is amended by adding
entries in numerical order in the table to read as follows:
602.101  OMB Control numbers.
* * * * *
     (c) * * *
CFR part or section where                      Current OMB
identified and described                       control No.
*        *        *        *        *
26.2601-1.....................................1545-0985
*        *        *        *        *
26.2632-1.....................................1545-0985
*        *        *        *        *
26.2642-1.....................................1545-0985
26.2642-2.....................................1545-0985
26.2642-3.....................................1545-0985
26.2642-4.....................................1545-0985
*        *        *        *        *
26.2652-2.....................................1545-0985
*        *        *        *        *
26.2662-2.....................................1545-0985
*        *        *        *        *
                              Commissioner of Internal Revenue
 Approved:
          Assistant Secretary of the Treasury