From lucas@fnal.gov Mon Aug 30 09:11:33 2004
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:11:31 -0500
From: lucas@fnal.gov
Subject: Fwd: Re: HT101/HT102
To: wehmann@fnal.gov
Content-language: en
Priority: normal

Alan, If there are any database entries for this corrector, they
should change to the new name.  <Peter>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes

Return-path: <ducar@fnal.gov>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102
In-reply-to: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>
To: lucas@fnal.gov

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes


From wehmann@fnal.gov Wed Mar  2 14:30:01 2005
Date: 30 Aug 2004 10:23:43 -0500
From: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
To: winterowd@fnal.gov 
CC: lucas@fnal.gov,ducar@fnal.gov 
Subject: [lucas@fnal.gov: Fwd: Re: HT101/HT102]
Reply-to: wehmann@fnal.gov

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline

Alan,    If there are any database entries for this corrector, they should change to the new name.  <Peter>

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <ducar@fnal.gov>
Received: from imapservera.fnal.gov ([131.225.9.7])
 by imapserver1.fnal.gov (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15)
 with SMTP id I3418P00.V7A for <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from mailgw1.fnal.gov ([131.225.111.11])
 by imapservera.fnal.gov (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2004082709504915803 for
 <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from mailav1.fnal.gov (mailav1.fnal.gov [131.225.111.18])
 by mailgw1.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with SMTP id <0I3400N7218H25@mailgw1.fnal.gov> for lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov;
 Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgw2.fnal.gov ([131.225.111.12])
 by mailav1.fnal.gov (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2004082709504913900 for
 <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from conversion-daemon.mailgw2.fnal.gov by mailgw2.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 id <0I3400F0116546@mailgw2.fnal.gov> (original mail from ducar@fnal.gov)
 for lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov (ORCPT lucas@fnal.gov); Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from fnal.gov (bdnumi04.fnal.gov [131.225.130.136])
 by mailgw2.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with ESMTPA id <0I3400HN618OBU@mailgw2.fnal.gov> for
 lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov (ORCPT lucas@fnal.gov); Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102
In-reply-to: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>
To: lucas@fnal.gov
Message-id: <412F4A48.9010009@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113
References: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)--

------- End of forwarded message -------

-- 
Alan Wehmann
wehmann@fnal.gov
Fermilab
(630) 840-4692
(630) 840-6039 (fax)
snail-mail: M.S. 220
PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500



From wehmann@fnal.gov Wed Mar  2 14:30:01 2005
Date: 1 Feb 2005 15:21:45 -0600
From: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
To: krafczyk@fnal.gov 
CC: slh@fnal.gov,lucas@fnal.gov,childress@fnal.gov 
Subject: E:H104
Reply-to: wehmann@fnal.gov

Hi George,

   Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and parameter
page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" still exist.  I
do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.

Cheers,
Alan

-- 
Alan Wehmann
wehmann@fnal.gov
Fermilab
(630) 840-4692
(630) 840-6039 (fax)
snail-mail: M.S. 220
PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500



From krafczyk@fnal.gov Tue Feb  1 17:39:48 2005
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:39:46 -0600
From: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: E:H104
In-reply-to: <200502012121.j11LLjQP023285@fsui03.fnal.gov>
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: slh@fnal.gov, lucas@fnal.gov, childress@fnal.gov
Content-description: Mail message body
Priority: normal

The 466 card is NOT used and can be removed at some appropiate 
time.  E:HT104 has NEW data base entries and uses a spare channel 
of an existing 453 in the corrector rack.  I have added the E:HT104 
parameters to the existing E38 pages.

George

On 1 Feb 2005 at 15:21, Alan Wehmann wrote:

> Hi George,
> 
>    Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
> anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
> driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and parameter
> page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" still exist.  I
> do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan
> 
> -- 
> Alan Wehmann
> wehmann@fnal.gov
> Fermilab
> (630) 840-4692
> (630) 840-6039 (fax)
> snail-mail: M.S. 220
> PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500





From lucas@fnal.gov Wed Feb  2 11:56:51 2005
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:56:50 -0600
From: lucas@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: E:H104
To: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Cc: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>, slh@fnal.gov, childress@fnal.gov
Content-language: en
Content-disposition: inline
Priority: normal

Hi,    One question. Are we sure of the polarity?  <PL>

----- Original Message -----
From: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2005 5:39 pm
Subject: Re: E:H104

> The 466 card is NOT used and can be removed at some appropiate 
> time.  E:HT104 has NEW data base entries and uses a spare channel 
> of an existing 453 in the corrector rack.  I have added the 
> E:HT104 
> parameters to the existing E38 pages.
> 
> George
> 
> On 1 Feb 2005 at 15:21, Alan Wehmann wrote:
> 
> > Hi George,
> > 
> >    Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
> > anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
> > driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and 
> parameter> page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" 
> still exist.  I
> > do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alan Wehmann
> > wehmann@fnal.gov
> > Fermilab
> > (630) 840-4692
> > (630) 840-6039 (fax)
> > snail-mail: M.S. 220
> > PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500
> 
> 
> 
> 



From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 10:54:56 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:54:31 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: NuMI H104 -> HT104
To: Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>, Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

Marv,  (per our recent telecon)

The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
supply.

An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read "Loss 
Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  I will 
get new cable labels to you soon.

Thanks,  Dukes



From Molson@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 11:17:37 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:17:25 -0600
From: Marvin Olson <Molson@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: NuMI H104 -> HT104
In-reply-to: <42122947.3030503@fnal.gov>
To: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

Alan
Since you made the original data base entry, do you want the honors of 
making this change?
marvinolson

Bob Ducar wrote:

> Marv,  (per our recent telecon)
>
> The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
> reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
> supply.
>
> An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
> E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read 
> "Loss Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  
> I will get new cable labels to you soon.
>
> Thanks,  Dukes
>


From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 15:37:43 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:37:29 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: H104 to HT104
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Sam Childress <childress@fnal.gov>,
        Bruce Baller <baller@fnal.gov>, Steve Hays <slh@fnal.gov>,
        Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>, Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>,
        Leon Bartelson <bartelson@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

The recent change of H104 to HT104 with the power supply now being a 
trim element regulator instead of a 20 kW PEI is reflected in the 
attached document.  The loss monitor for that location is also being 
changed.

The C466 module that used to control the device will remain with its 
cabling and associated database entries per Steve Hays' request.  It may 
come in handy if one of the other PEIs breaks.  The Beam Permit System 
will no longer look at H104 parameters.

I suggest the E38 parameter page(s) be looked at to come into alignment 
with this new reality.  Give me a call if any questions.  Alan - please 
post this version of CR on the WEB for all to see.

Any questions - give me a call at 4040.

Dukes
   Press C-c C-c here to receive file transmission

From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 15:37:43 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:37:29 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: H104 to HT104
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Sam Childress <childress@fnal.gov>,
        Bruce Baller <baller@fnal.gov>, Steve Hays <slh@fnal.gov>,
        Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>, Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>,
        Leon Bartelson <bartelson@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

The recent change of H104 to HT104 with the power supply now being a 
trim element regulator instead of a 20 kW PEI is reflected in the 
attached document.  The loss monitor for that location is also being 
changed.

The C466 module that used to control the device will remain with its 
cabling and associated database entries per Steve Hays' request.  It may 
come in handy if one of the other PEIs breaks.  The Beam Permit System 
will no longer look at H104 parameters.

I suggest the E38 parameter page(s) be looked at to come into alignment 
with this new reality.  Give me a call if any questions.  Alan - please 
post this version of CR on the WEB for all to see.

Any questions - give me a call at 4040.

Dukes
   Press C-c C-c here to receive file transmission

From Molson@fnal.gov Fri Feb 18 12:39:20 2005
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:39:15 -0600
From: Marvin Olson <Molson@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: NuMI H104 -> HT104
In-reply-to: <42122947.3030503@fnal.gov>
To: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

This data base change has been made.
marvinolson

Bob Ducar wrote:

> Marv,  (per our recent telecon)
>
> The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
> reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
> supply.
>
> An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
> E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read 
> "Loss Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  
> I will get new cable labels to you soon.
>
> Thanks,  Dukes
>



From Molson@fnal.gov Fri Feb 18 12:39:20 2005
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:39:15 -0600
From: Marvin Olson <Molson@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: NuMI H104 -> HT104
In-reply-to: <42122947.3030503@fnal.gov>
To: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

This data base change has been made.
marvinolson

Bob Ducar wrote:

> Marv,  (per our recent telecon)
>
> The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
> reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
> supply.
>
> An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
> E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read 
> "Loss Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  
> I will get new cable labels to you soon.
>
> Thanks,  Dukes
>



From lucas@fnal.gov Mon Aug 30 09:11:33 2004
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:11:31 -0500
From: lucas@fnal.gov
Subject: Fwd: Re: HT101/HT102
To: wehmann@fnal.gov
Content-language: en
Priority: normal

Alan, If there are any database entries for this corrector, they
should change to the new name.  <Peter>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes

Return-path: <ducar@fnal.gov>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102
In-reply-to: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>
To: lucas@fnal.gov

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes


From wehmann@fnal.gov Wed Mar  2 14:45:28 2005
Date: 30 Aug 2004 10:23:43 -0500
From: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
To: winterowd@fnal.gov 
CC: lucas@fnal.gov,ducar@fnal.gov 
Subject: [lucas@fnal.gov: Fwd: Re: HT101/HT102]
Reply-to: wehmann@fnal.gov

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline

Alan,    If there are any database entries for this corrector, they should change to the new name.  <Peter>

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <ducar@fnal.gov>
Received: from imapservera.fnal.gov ([131.225.9.7])
 by imapserver1.fnal.gov (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15)
 with SMTP id I3418P00.V7A for <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from mailgw1.fnal.gov ([131.225.111.11])
 by imapservera.fnal.gov (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2004082709504915803 for
 <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from mailav1.fnal.gov (mailav1.fnal.gov [131.225.111.18])
 by mailgw1.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with SMTP id <0I3400N7218H25@mailgw1.fnal.gov> for lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov;
 Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgw2.fnal.gov ([131.225.111.12])
 by mailav1.fnal.gov (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2004082709504913900 for
 <lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov>; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500
Received: from conversion-daemon.mailgw2.fnal.gov by mailgw2.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 id <0I3400F0116546@mailgw2.fnal.gov> (original mail from ducar@fnal.gov)
 for lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov (ORCPT lucas@fnal.gov); Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from fnal.gov (bdnumi04.fnal.gov [131.225.130.136])
 by mailgw2.fnal.gov
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with ESMTPA id <0I3400HN618OBU@mailgw2.fnal.gov> for
 lucas@imapserver1.fnal.gov (ORCPT lucas@fnal.gov); Fri,
 27 Aug 2004 09:50:49 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:50:48 -0500
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: HT101/HT102
In-reply-to: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>
To: lucas@fnal.gov
Message-id: <412F4A48.9010009@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113
References: <d8f37d71c2.d71c2d8f37@fnal.gov>

lucas@fnal.gov wrote:

> Hi,    I am thinking that we had better bite the bullet and change the 
> name of HT102 to the more logical HT101. I realize that there will be 
> some near term annoyance in doing this. However the wrong name will 
> confuse, for years to come, any person charged with tuning the beam.  
> <Peter>
> 
OK  Will do.  Dukes

--Boundary_(ID_iFnX+/44DkXd06W5Zk8C+Q)--

------- End of forwarded message -------

-- 
Alan Wehmann
wehmann@fnal.gov
Fermilab
(630) 840-4692
(630) 840-6039 (fax)
snail-mail: M.S. 220
PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500



From wehmann@fnal.gov Wed Mar  2 14:45:28 2005
Date: 1 Feb 2005 15:21:45 -0600
From: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
To: krafczyk@fnal.gov 
CC: slh@fnal.gov,lucas@fnal.gov,childress@fnal.gov 
Subject: E:H104
Reply-to: wehmann@fnal.gov

Hi George,

   Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and parameter
page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" still exist.  I
do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.

Cheers,
Alan

-- 
Alan Wehmann
wehmann@fnal.gov
Fermilab
(630) 840-4692
(630) 840-6039 (fax)
snail-mail: M.S. 220
PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500



From krafczyk@fnal.gov Tue Feb  1 17:39:48 2005
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:39:46 -0600
From: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: E:H104
In-reply-to: <200502012121.j11LLjQP023285@fsui03.fnal.gov>
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: slh@fnal.gov, lucas@fnal.gov, childress@fnal.gov
Content-description: Mail message body
Priority: normal

The 466 card is NOT used and can be removed at some appropiate 
time.  E:HT104 has NEW data base entries and uses a spare channel 
of an existing 453 in the corrector rack.  I have added the E:HT104 
parameters to the existing E38 pages.

George

On 1 Feb 2005 at 15:21, Alan Wehmann wrote:

> Hi George,
> 
>    Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
> anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
> driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and parameter
> page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" still exist.  I
> do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan
> 
> -- 
> Alan Wehmann
> wehmann@fnal.gov
> Fermilab
> (630) 840-4692
> (630) 840-6039 (fax)
> snail-mail: M.S. 220
> PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500





From lucas@fnal.gov Wed Feb  2 11:56:51 2005
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:56:50 -0600
From: lucas@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: E:H104
To: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Cc: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>, slh@fnal.gov, childress@fnal.gov
Content-language: en
Content-disposition: inline
Priority: normal

Hi,    One question. Are we sure of the polarity?  <PL>

----- Original Message -----
From: krafczyk@fnal.gov
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2005 5:39 pm
Subject: Re: E:H104

> The 466 card is NOT used and can be removed at some appropiate 
> time.  E:HT104 has NEW data base entries and uses a spare channel 
> of an existing 453 in the corrector rack.  I have added the 
> E:HT104 
> parameters to the existing E38 pages.
> 
> George
> 
> On 1 Feb 2005 at 15:21, Alan Wehmann wrote:
> 
> > Hi George,
> > 
> >    Is the 466 card that used to drive the E:H104 magnet doing
> > anything?  Or is it being held in reserve?  Isn't that magnet now
> > driven by E:HT104 and a 453 card?  The database entries and 
> parameter> page lines (e.g. E38 bnds) for E:H104 and its "family" 
> still exist.  I
> > do see that E:HT104 has appeared on the trim list on E38 trms.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alan Wehmann
> > wehmann@fnal.gov
> > Fermilab
> > (630) 840-4692
> > (630) 840-6039 (fax)
> > snail-mail: M.S. 220
> > PO Box 500, zip 60510-0500
> 
> 
> 
> 



From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 10:54:56 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:54:31 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: NuMI H104 -> HT104
To: Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>, Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

Marv,  (per our recent telecon)

The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
supply.

An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read "Loss 
Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  I will 
get new cable labels to you soon.

Thanks,  Dukes



From Molson@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 11:17:37 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:17:25 -0600
From: Marvin Olson <Molson@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: NuMI H104 -> HT104
In-reply-to: <42122947.3030503@fnal.gov>
To: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

Alan
Since you made the original data base entry, do you want the honors of 
making this change?
marvinolson

Bob Ducar wrote:

> Marv,  (per our recent telecon)
>
> The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
> reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
> supply.
>
> An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
> E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read 
> "Loss Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  
> I will get new cable labels to you soon.
>
> Thanks,  Dukes
>


From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 15:37:43 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:37:29 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: H104 to HT104
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Sam Childress <childress@fnal.gov>,
        Bruce Baller <baller@fnal.gov>, Steve Hays <slh@fnal.gov>,
        Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>, Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>,
        Leon Bartelson <bartelson@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

The recent change of H104 to HT104 with the power supply now being a 
trim element regulator instead of a 20 kW PEI is reflected in the 
attached document.  The loss monitor for that location is also being 
changed.

The C466 module that used to control the device will remain with its 
cabling and associated database entries per Steve Hays' request.  It may 
come in handy if one of the other PEIs breaks.  The Beam Permit System 
will no longer look at H104 parameters.

I suggest the E38 parameter page(s) be looked at to come into alignment 
with this new reality.  Give me a call if any questions.  Alan - please 
post this version of CR on the WEB for all to see.

Any questions - give me a call at 4040.

Dukes
   Press C-c C-c here to receive file transmission

From ducar@fnal.gov Tue Feb 15 15:37:43 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:37:29 -0600
From: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Subject: H104 to HT104
To: Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Sam Childress <childress@fnal.gov>,
        Bruce Baller <baller@fnal.gov>, Steve Hays <slh@fnal.gov>,
        Marv Olson <molson@fnal.gov>, Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>,
        Leon Bartelson <bartelson@fnal.gov>
Organization: Accelerator Division, NuMI Department
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
 Gecko/20040113

The recent change of H104 to HT104 with the power supply now being a 
trim element regulator instead of a 20 kW PEI is reflected in the 
attached document.  The loss monitor for that location is also being 
changed.

The C466 module that used to control the device will remain with its 
cabling and associated database entries per Steve Hays' request.  It may 
come in handy if one of the other PEIs breaks.  The Beam Permit System 
will no longer look at H104 parameters.

I suggest the E38 parameter page(s) be looked at to come into alignment 
with this new reality.  Give me a call if any questions.  Alan - please 
post this version of CR on the WEB for all to see.

Any questions - give me a call at 4040.

Dukes
   Press C-c C-c here to receive file transmission

From Molson@fnal.gov Fri Feb 18 12:39:20 2005
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:39:15 -0600
From: Marvin Olson <Molson@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: NuMI H104 -> HT104
In-reply-to: <42122947.3030503@fnal.gov>
To: Bob Ducar <ducar@fnal.gov>
Cc: Peter Lucas <lucas@fnal.gov>, Alan Wehmann <wehmann@fnal.gov>,
        Kent Triplett <triplett@fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

This data base change has been made.
marvinolson

Bob Ducar wrote:

> Marv,  (per our recent telecon)
>
> The 200 turn dipole in the NuMI Beamline in the Main Injector has been 
> reconfigured to be controlled from Leon Bartelson's trim element power 
> supply.
>
> An associated change relates to the loss monitor in that region. 
> E:LMH104 needs to be renamed as E:LMHT04.  Description should read 
> "Loss Monitor #7 at HT104".  Please make necessary database changes.  
> I will get new cable labels to you soon.
>
> Thanks,  Dukes
>