<document>
<doctype type="OTHER">
<docheader>
<DISPOSITION></DISPOSITION>
</docheader>
<section>
<p style="TITLE">(ORDER LIST: 526 U.S.)<left></p>
<p style="Normal"><center><font b="1">MONDAY, MAY 3, 1999<center></p>
<p>
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION<center></p>
<p>
<left><font>98-1284   SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS V. GRIJALVA, GREGORIA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>
              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">              United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              further consideration in light of <font i="1">American Manufacturers<left></p>
<p>
<font>              <font i="1">Mutual Insurance Company<font> v. <font i="1">Sullivan<font>, 526 U.S. _____ (1999);<left></p>
<p>
              Sections 4001 and 4002 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997,<left></p>
<p>
              Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 275-330; and the regulations <left></p>
<p>
              of the Secretary of Health and Human Services implementing <left></p>
<p>
              those provisions.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ORDERS IN PENDING CASES<center></p>
<p style="Normal">M-60      GEORGE E. McDERMOTT V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
                   The motion to direct the Clerk to file a <left></p>
<p>
               for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.<left></p>
<p>
98-8239   LOWE, RONALD D. V. OKLAHOMA<left></p>
<p>
                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>
<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is<left></p>
<p>
              allowed until May 24, 1999, within which to pay the<left></p>
<p>
              docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a<left></p>
<p>
              petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<left></p>
<p>
              this Court.<left></p>
<p>
98-8366   RIVERA, VINCENT F. V. FLORIDA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>
<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is<left></p>
<p>
              allowed until May 24, 1999, within which to pay the<left></p>
<p>
              docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a<left></p>
<p>
              petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<left></p>
<p>
              this Court.<left></p>
<p>
98-8754   DeBARDELEBEN, JAMES M. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>
<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is<left></p>
<p>
              allowed until May 24, 1999, within which to pay the<left></p>
<p>
              docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a<left></p>
<p>
              petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<left></p>
<p>
              this Court.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI GRANTED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1036   ILLINOIS V. WARDLOW, WILLIAM AKA SAM<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed <left></p>
<p>
<font i="1">              in forma pauperis<font> is granted. The petition for a <left></p>
<p>
              writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>
98-1441   ROE, WARDEN V. ORTEGA, LUCIO FLORES<left></p>
<p style="Normal">                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed <left></p>
<p>
              <font i="1">in forma pauperis<font> is granted. The petition for a writ <left></p>
<p>
              of certiorari is granted limited to Question 2 presented <left></p>
<p>
              by the petition.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1054   MALLADI, VISALAKSHI V. WEST, SEC. OF VA<left></p>
<p>
98-1058   POTTS, ROBERT D. vs. SEC<left></p>
<p>
98-1092 ) GONZALEZ-NAVARRO, RICARDO V. BONILLA, LUIS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
        )<left></p>
<p>
98-1425 ) BONILLA, LUIS, ET AL. V. VOLVO CAR CORP.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">98-1201   MATSUSHITA ELEC. CO., ET AL. V. ZIEGLER, JOHN<left></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1211   KANOWITZ FRUIT & PRODUCE V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1303   KLEIN, ELLEN V. COURTWRIGHT, DAVID, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1360   MONTIONE, CHARLES V. PENNSYLVANIA<left></p>
<p>
98-1377   ROBERTSON, JAMES M., ET UX. V. NEUROMEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1382   PULITZER PUBLISHING CO. V. GODFREY, THOMAS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1386   INGLE, CAROL, ET AL. V. DOW CORNING CORP, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1393   STUN-TECH, INC. vs. R.A.C.C. INDUSTRIES, INC.<left></p>
<p>
98-1394   KING, KERMIE M. V. HERBERT J. THOMAS MEM. HOSP.<left></p>
<p>
98-1395   POLAROID CORPORATION V. OFFERMAN, NC SEC. OF REVENUE<left></p>
<p>
98-1396   WOODYEAR, MARILYN V. CLARKE INS. INC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1401   LaRUE, CLYDE V. ILLINOIS, ETC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1406   JENNINGS, EDNA V. COUTSCOUDIS, SANDRA, ET VIR<left></p>
<p>
98-1407   HUMPHRESS, DONALD P. V. UNITED PARCEL SERV., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1408   SCHMIDT, MARILYN V. GOSCICKI, THOMAS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1409   DAWSON, OLIN V. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF LSU<left></p>
<p>
98-1424   COLLAGEN CORPORATION V. KENNEDY, CHARLOTTE, ET VIR<left></p>
<p>
98-1430   BROWN, RONALD A. V. MAYOR OF BALTIMORE<left></p>
<p>
98-1431   RUPERT, WILLIAM V. FDIC, ETC.<left></p>
<p>
98-1496   CREEKMORE, WYNNE L. V. VASA N. ATLANTIC INS. CO.<left></p>
<p>
98-1516   STICH, JOSEPH P. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC<left></p>
<p>
98-1576   TURNER, ALLAN L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-1580   TSUJI, STANLEY R. V. HAWAII, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-1591   ROJAS-ORTEGA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-1601   ROBINSON, JOHN A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-1617   EMERSON, GERALD W. vs. BD. OF ZONING APP., FAIRFAX<left></p>
<p>
98-7406   ROBISON, LARRY K. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>
98-7481   JACKSON, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-7915   HUCKABY, HENRY L. V. HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMIN.<left></p>
<p>
98-8281   CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM E. V. WOODS, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8283   RIBOT-CARINO, JUAN V. LABOY-ALVARADO, ZOE, ETC.<left></p>
<p>
98-8294   SUMTER, ROSETTA V. NEW JERSEY<left></p>
<p>
98-8297   WILSON, IRVIN J. V. BOLLINGER, ROBERT, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8300   ABDUS-SABIR, ABDULLAH V. HIGHTOWER, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8309   NUNLEY, RODERICK V. MISSOURI<left></p>
<p>
98-8315   BONNER, DAVID B. V. CRABTREE, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8323   DIAZ, ANGEL N. V. FLORIDA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8328   FORD, WILLIE T. V. SAUNDERS, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8329   GRIFFIN, LONNIE V. SCOTT, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8331   DOUGLAS, ISTIVAN C. V. EASLEY, ATT'Y GEN. OF NC<left></p>
<p>
98-8333   PARKER, NORMAN V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>
98-8341   COGDILL, DONALD M. V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8342   COX, ANTONIO V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC<left></p>
<p>
98-8344   BROMWELL, KEVIN V. DORMIRE, SUPT.<left></p>
<p>
98-8346   VINYARD, BARBARA H. V. STEWART, DIR., AZ DOC<left></p>
<p>
98-8348   ADAMS, LAMONT V. NEW YORK<left></p>
<p>
98-8352   SHIVAEE, CHEVY R. V. VIRGINIA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8360   FRASER, JOHN D. V. DAWES, CAROLE, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8369   KARAJAH, H. vs. DC DEPT. OF HOUSING, ETC.<left></p>
<p>
98-8374   MATTHEWS, LLOYD V. MASSACHUSETTS<left></p>
<p>
98-8375   WHATLEY, FREDERICK R. V. GEORGIA<left></p>
<p>
98-8377   McCOY, CHERYL V. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.<left></p>
<p>
98-8383   BROWN, PAUL A. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>
98-8391   WILLIAMS, TRUMAN V. APFEL, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.<left></p>
<p>
98-8417   CASTILLEJA, ALBERT J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>
98-8433   COLE, FRANKIE L. V. HOPKINS, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8435   LARKINS, RONALD V. ANDERSON, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8440   LEBEDUN, ALLEN A. V. VIRGINIA<left></p>
<p>
98-8453   GARDNER, RAYFORD L. V. KENTUCKY<left></p>
<p>
98-8463   GUZMAN, JAMES V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>
98-8475   SIMPSON, RAYMOND V. LEAR ASTRONICS CORP.<left></p>
<p>
98-8484   CALDWELL, LEO J. V. BAKER, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8485   BEASLEY, WILLIAM E. V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>
98-8492   BUTLER, ROBERT L. V. RENO POLICE DEPT., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8494   EASLEY, CLARENCE V. VAUGHN, SUPT., GRATERFORD<left></p>
<p>
98-8507   HUTCHINSON, DARNELL V. FULCOMER, THOMAS A., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8559   HARPER, SCOTT W. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>
98-8566   FREDERICK, DAVID S. V. GUDMANSON, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8605   ARROYO, EDGAR S. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>
98-8631   CAMPBELL, DAVID L. V. USDC SD OH<left></p>
<p>
98-8647   HOWARD, KENDRICK V. LOUISIANA<left></p>
<p>
98-8677   MOORE, CYRUS W. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>
98-8683   JOHNSON, KENNETH V. ANDERSON, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>
98-8694   BELLANGER, RICKIE J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8700   SHAY, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8717   SUMRALL, DAVID A. vs. MD DOC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8728 ) PAGE, MANUAL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
        )<left></p>
<p>
98-8760 ) BURRESS, CARL R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8734   MEANS, WILLIE C. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8746   HARDY, LORENZO M. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8751   GOODRIDGE, RALPH A. V. UNITED SATTES<left></p>
<p>
98-8753   HACH, CARL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8755   SAVAGE-EL, TERRY E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8761   LOOKER, FLOYD R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8763   JONES, KENNETH B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8765   WEYMOUTH, ERIC V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8766   CARROLL, GERALD L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8768   BULL, FRED V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8771 ) HEATH, LAVON V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
        )<left></p>
<p>
98-8839 ) DAVIS, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8775   SPEARMAN, IRA V. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8776   BOB, BERNARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8778   HARPINE, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8779   ZAMBRANO, NELSON T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8780   WICKS, JAMES T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8784   BELL, KYLE A. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-8792   WALLIN, LAMAINT D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8796   BETANCOURT, JORGE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8801   WILSON, DAVID A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8807   ADDAIR, DARRELL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8808   ROYSTER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8809   SACKY, FRED V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8811   RICHARDSON, ALLEN B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8813   CANNON, DAVID O. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8820   PEDRAZA, ENRIQUE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8825   CORDERO, JOHN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8829   WEST, GILBERT L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8834 ) FREEMAN, MARCUS L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
        )<left></p>
<p>
98-8859 ) JACKSON, JESSE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8845   JORDAN, BARRY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8853   MARCILOUS, ALFRED R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8855   MONTALVO-DOMINGUEZ, OSBALDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8858   MOLINA, ROLANDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-8865   WHITMORE, REGINALD B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.<left></p>
<p>
98-1418   FLORIDA V. LANCASTER, ANTHONY<left></p>
<p>
                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>
<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is granted. The petition for a writ of<left></p>
<p>
              certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">98-8686   SWANN, CALVIN E. V. TAYLOR, WARDEN<left></p>
<p style="Normal">(A-884)<left></p>
<p>
                   The application for stay of execution of sentence of <left></p>
<p>
              death presented to the Chief Justice and by him referred <left></p>
<p>
              to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of <left></p>
<p>
              certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">HABEAS CORPUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-8925   IN RE GERALD L. ROGERS<left></p>
<p>
                   The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">MANDAMUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1562   IN RE ROLAND L. GOAD<left></p>
<p>
98-8663   IN RE DOLORES QUINONES<left></p>
<p>
98-8665   IN RE DONALD BOBCHICK<left></p>
<p>
98-8668   IN RE WILLIAM RAY BROWN<left></p>
<p>
98-8741   IN RE MICHAEL ANTHONY NOBLE<left></p>
<p>
                   The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">REHEARINGS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1151   CONSTANT, JAMES V. ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES<left></p>
<p>
98-6473   COLEMAN, GLENN L. V. BEILEIN, THOMAS A.<left></p>
<p>
98-7369   SKORNIAK, FRANK V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>
98-7476   MacPHEE, JAMES M. V. CALIFORNIA<left></p>
<p>
98-7598   JENNINGS, WILLIAM V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>
98-7679   BOYD, DONALD V. HELFER, CHAIRMAN, FDIC<left></p>
<p>
98-7727   SIKORA, MATTHEW V. HOPKINS, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-7769   CAGLE, JAMES E. V. CHAMPION, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>
98-7977   TOBIE, JOE N. V. DEPT. OF INTERIOR<left></p>
<p>
                   The petitions for rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p>
98-40     LaFONTAINE, SERGIO V. COMMR. OF CORR. SERVS. OF NY<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              further herein <font i="1">in forma pauperis<font> is granted. The motion<left></p>
<p>
              for leave to file a petition for rehearing is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE<center></p>
<p style="Normal">D-2033    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF H. GENE BALDRIDGE<left></p>
<p>
                   H. Gene Baldridge, of Ashland, Kentucky, having<left></p>
<p>
              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>
              order of February 22, 1999; and a rule having been<left></p>
<p>
              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause<left></p>
<p>
              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a<left></p>
<p>
              response having expired;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that H. Gene Baldridge is disbarred<left></p>
<p>
              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2035    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALBERT IRA GOULD<left></p>
<p>
                   Albert Ira Gould, of Bolton, Massachusetts, having<left></p>
<p>
              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>
              order of February 22, 1999; and a rule having been<left></p>
<p>
              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause<left></p>
<p>
              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a<left></p>
<p>
              response having expired;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that Albert Ira Gould is disbarred<left></p>
<p>
              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2045    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID STEPHEN HOLLANDER<left></p>
<p>
                   David Stephen Hollander, of Boca Raton, Florida,<left></p>
<p>
              having been suspended from the practice of law in this<left></p>
<p>
              Court by order of February 22, 1999; and a rule having<left></p>
<p>
              been issued and served upon him requiring him to show<left></p>
<p>
              cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to<left></p>
<p>
              file a response having expired;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that David Stephen Hollander is<left></p>
<p>
              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2047    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANFORD DONALD HESS<left></p>
<p>
                   Stanford Donald Hess, of Baltimore Maryland, having<left></p>
<p>
              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>
              order of March 1, 1999; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>
              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>
              should not be disbarred; and a response having been<left></p>
<p>
              filed;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that Stanford Donald Hess is<left></p>
<p>
              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2048    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARY ELLIS WOLOSIN<left></p>
<p>
                   Gary Ellis Wolosin, of Cincinnati, Ohio, having<left></p>
<p>
              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>
              order of March 1, 1999; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>
              requiring him to show cause why he should not be<left></p>
<p>
              disbarred;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that Gary Ellis Wolosin is disbarred<left></p>
<p>
              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2050    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD HAMILTON PHILLIPS<left></p>
<p>
                   Edward Hamilton Phillips, of Chicago, Illinois,<left></p>
<p>
              having been suspended from the practice of law in this<left></p>
<p>
              Court by order of March 8, 1999; and a rule having been<left></p>
<p>
              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause<left></p>
<p>
              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a<left></p>
<p>
              response having expired;<left></p>
<p>
                   It is ordered that Edward Hamilton Phillips is<left></p>
<p>
              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2069    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELDON IRWIN WALKER<left></p>
<p>
                   Sheldon Irwin Walker, of Brooklyn, New York, is<left></p>
<p>
              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a<left></p>
<p>
              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring<left></p>
<p>
              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from<left></p>
<p>
              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>
D-2070    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BENJAMIN V. R. CONLON<left></p>
<p>
                   Benjamin V. R. Conlon, of Lake Norman, North<left></p>
<p>
              Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this<left></p>
<p>
              Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days,<left></p>
<p>
              requiring him to show cause why he should not be<left></p>
<p>
              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
</section>
</document>