<document>
<doctype type="OTHER">
<docheader>
<DISPOSITION></DISPOSITION>
</docheader>
<section>
<p style="TITLE">(ORDER LIST: 526 U.S.)<left></p>
<p style="Normal"><center><font b="1">TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 1999<center></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-126    BOARD OF TRUSTEES, UNIV. IL V. JANE DOE, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit<left></p>
<p>

              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">Davis<font> v. <font i="1">Monroe<left></p>
<p>

              County Board of Education, <font>526 U.S. _____ (1999).<left></p>
<p>

98-980    JEAN, LESLY V. COLLINS, DELMA, ETC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">              United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">Wilson<font> v. <font i="1">Layne<font>,<left></p>
<p>

              526 U.S. ____ (1999).<left></p>
<p>

98-1361   RICHARDSON, RALPH V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit<left></p>
<p>

              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">Reno<font> v. <font i="1">American<font>-<left></p>
<p>

              <font i="1">Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm.<font>, 525 U.S. ____ (1999).<left></p>
<p>

98-1381   AMERITECH CORP., ET AL. V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the<left></p>
<p>

              United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit<left></p>
<p>

              for further consideration in light of <font i="1">AT&T Corp.<font> v. <font i="1">Iowa<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">Utilities Board,<font> 525 U.S. ____ (1999).<left></p>
<p>

98-5286   MOORE, STEPHANIE V. PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> and the petition for a writ of certiorari<left></p>
<p>

              are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is<left></p>
<p>

              remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the<left></p>
<p>

              Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of<left></p>
<p>

              <font i="1">Cleveland<font> v. <font i="1">Policy Management Systems<font>, 526 U.S. ____<left></p>
<p>

              (1999).<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ORDERS IN PENDING CASES<center></p>
<p style="Normal">M-69      CHRISTOPHER EVANS HUBBART V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,<left></p>
<p>

            COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

M-70      SALVATORE GRILLO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

M-71      EMMA VICTORIA HOWARD V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE<left></p>
<p>

            MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for<left></p>
<p>

              writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-7299 ) IN RE VINCENT RIVERA<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

98-7983 ) IN RE VINCENT F. RIVERA<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              orders denying leave to proceed <font i="1">in forma pauperis<font> is<left></p>
<p>

              denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-8711   TYLER, MELVIN L., ET AL. V. MORIARTY, JUDGE, ETC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioners are<left></p>
<p>

              allowed until June 22, 1999, within which to pay the<left></p>
<p>

              docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a<left></p>
<p>

              petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<left></p>
<p>

              this Court.<left></p>
<p>

98-8726   PEACE, WILLIAM H. V. EMPLOY. SEC. COMM'N OF NC<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma pauperis<font> is denied. Petitioner is allowed until<left></p>
<p>

              June 22, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee<left></p>
<p>

              required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in<left></p>
<p>

              compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-1991   WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. GRIFFITH, CLYDE N.<left></p>
<p>

98-249    MAYHEW, CHARLES, ET AL. V. SUNNYVALE, TX<left></p>
<p>

98-859    BOEING CO. V. ALDRICH, KENNETH W.<left></p>
<p>

98-1048   MEESTER, MARJORIE A. V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GEN.<left></p>
<p>

98-1097   U-HAUL CO. OF CLEVELAND V. KUNKLE, LEE<left></p>
<p>

98-1203   GILPIN, WILLIAM V. WEST, SEC. OF VA<left></p>
<p>

98-1206   MABEY, RALPH, ETC., ET AL. vs. SW ELEC. POWER CO., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1280   WEBB, EARL ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1297 ) NICHOLSON, JOSEPH V. KENTUCKY, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p>

98-1331 ) BIRD, ROBERT A. V. KENTUCKY<left></p>
<p>

98-1369   BURKE, JOSEPH J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1372   BROWN, REBECCA, ETC. V. NationsBANK OF GA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1391   BLAREK, ANTONY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1428   CORN, HERMAN V. LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1440   PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY V. CF&I FABRICATORS OF UTAH<left></p>
<p>

98-1541   BRUNEAU, EVE, ETC. V. SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCH.<left></p>
<p>

98-1546   COYNE, JOHN V. MOHR, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-1550   HARRIS, JANET G. V. GEN. MOTORS POWERTRAIN<left></p>
<p>

98-1560   DROSTE, BRIAN A. V. OHIO<left></p>
<p>

98-1565   ENTEZARI-AFSHAR, MOHAMMED V. WRIGHT, ROBERT<left></p>
<p>

98-1566   CLAPPER, DONALD E. V. CHESAPEAKE/SEVENTH-DAY ADVS.<left></p>
<p>

98-1569   BROWDER, MAYLON D. V. GMC<left></p>
<p>

98-1588   BENTON, BARRY ROBERT V. TX COMMN. FOR LAWYER DISCIP.<left></p>
<p>

98-1594   HOWERY, LIGITA V. WOLFBERG, JOSEPH, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1614   CROMER, BOB E. V. BAYLOR UNIV., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1630   FISHER, NANCI, ET VIR vs. CA SUPER. CT., ETC.<left></p>
<p>

98-1686   TRANSAERO, INC. vs. LA FUERZA AEREA BOLIVIANA<left></p>
<p>

98-1697   WALTERS, TERRELL, ET AL. vs. EDGAR, JAMES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1707   SLOANE, WALTER C. V. SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS<left></p>
<p>

98-1717   INTL. TELECARD ASSN. V. FCC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1720   ARAMONY, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1723   DIXON, JERRY T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1731   SAMUELS, KELVIN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1746   PETTUS, PAUL JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1749   MARLATT, WILMA V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1751   DABNEY, FAYE V. RUBIN, SEC. OF TREAS., ET AL<left></p>
<p>

98-1759   SMITH, THOMAS MARK V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1765   CRENSHAW, ANDRE S. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-1786   CAMACHO, FREDDIE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-7878   VEAL, NATHANIEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-7929   TATE, CHARLES C. V. WOOD, SUPT., WA<left></p>
<p>

98-7979   SHORTY, ROB V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-7981 ) POE, TRACY C. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

        )<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">98-8017 ) BOYD, TRACI P., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p style="Normal">98-8203   OLDS, RONALD C. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-8226   PIKE, CHRISTA G. V. TENNESSEE<left></p>
<p>

98-8262   ATKINS, RANDY L. V. NORTH CAROLINA<left></p>
<p>

98-8278   CREECH, THOMAS E. V. IDAHO<left></p>
<p>

98-8588   SHAMBURGER, RON S. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

98-8620   KARRIEM, ELIJAH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA<left></p>
<p>

98-8648   PRICE, BENJAMIN T. V. OHIO<left></p>
<p>

98-8673   ROGERS, REID R. V. CIRCUIT COURT OF MD, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8674   SANDERS, RICKY V. GOMEZ, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8676   MARTINEZ, DOMINGO V. vs. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-8678   MINNIECHESKE, DONALD V. SHAWANO CTY., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8679   MOORE, BOBBY E. V. SAPP, EDWARD, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8682   JONES, KEVIN D. V. DORMIRE, SUPT., JEFFERSON<left></p>
<p>

98-8690   WHITE, RICKEY V. GIBSON, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8691   WHITSEY, HAIJI S. V. ROE, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8695   HURNS, VICTOR V. ANDERSON, SUPT., MS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8703   RATLIFF, KEVIN E. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>

98-8720   CREEL, LYNN M. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-8727   WICKLIFFE, LONNIE V. INDIANA<left></p>
<p>

98-8730   BASS, DANEL L. V. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8732   WILLIAMS, JERRY F. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC<left></p>
<p>

98-8735   KANE, THOMAS S. V. HENRY, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-8743   CORREA, CESAR E. SERGE V. ELIOPOULAS, NIKOS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8744   BECTON, TOMMIE E. V. MARYLAND, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8745   DENNEY, DEBORAH V. EATON CORP.<left></p>
<p>

98-8750   GENTRY, JOHN L. V. TRIPPETT, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-8757   RUBERGE, LAWRENCE C. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-8759   WALKER, FERRIS V. ILLINOIS<left></p>
<p>

98-8762   KUMARAN, SAMPATH V. O'MALLEY, PAUL R., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8764   BONNAR, GARY D. V. TERHUNE, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL<left></p>
<p>

98-8767   CHANG, AMY V. BEAUPIED, ALETA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8832   BUSH, CHARLIE V. NEBRASKA<left></p>
<p>

98-8841   ROYSTER, JOHN P. V. GALLETTA, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-8862   TAYLOR, TERRY N. V. REINHARD, JUDGE, USDC ND IL<left></p>
<p>

98-8879   SPAIN, CONNELL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-8887   WILLIAMS, JOHN R. vs. DEPT. OF VA<left></p>
<p>

98-8892   ABRAMS, EUGENE V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC<left></p>
<p>

98-8897   JOHNSON, WILEY V. PARKER, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-8928   KERSTEN, TIMOTHY A. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8931   TYLER, BILLY R. V. ROBERTS, DIANE C.<left></p>
<p>

98-8945   HOUGLAND, DAVID M., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-8950   ATWOOD, ROBERT E. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-8953   BRYANT, CURTIS V. MORTON, SUPT., NJ, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8982   SHURELDS, BARRI V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-8987   EPLEY, PAUL L. V. WEST, MILTON E., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-8998   WALKER, WESLEY R. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-9011   MACKLIN, OLIVER V. FRANK, SUPT., HUNTINGDON<left></p>
<p>

98-9031   LEE, SAMUEL E. V. OHIO<left></p>
<p>

98-9052   RAAB, THOMAS V. WISCONSIN<left></p>
<p>

98-9054   BEAVEN, MARION T. V. SCROGHAM, PHILLIP K.<left></p>
<p>

98-9055   CLAY, WILLIAM H. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9056   VARGAS, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9063   MURPHY, DENNIS P. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9064   WARWICK, JOHNNY E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9065   WILLIAMS, ALAN J. V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS<left></p>
<p>

98-9067   PITT, DONTE J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9068   PALOZIE, JONATHAN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9070   REVELO, PEDRO A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9071   AMBROSE, UNDRELL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9075   CUELLAR, MOISES V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9079   BUNDOC, ROMEO J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9081   WALKER, NATALIE T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9086   HALL, DONALD J. V. MISSOURI<left></p>
<p>

98-9087   AGUILERA-RAMIREZ, MARIO S. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9088   ADAMS, JAMES D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9091   PENIX, JESSE V. TURNER, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-9093   RODRIGUEZ, MIGUEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9100   DAVIS, JIMMY T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9101   GRANT, KENNETH A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9104   ELFENBEIN, EMANUEL B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9107   HUPP, MARION E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9109   HARRELL, DAVID V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9112   KILMARTIN, MARK V. DORMIRE, SUPT., JEFFERSON<left></p>
<p>

98-9115   MANGHAM, JOHNNIE V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-9117   KEEN, JAMES L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9122   KERKOWSKI, JOHN V. COSTELLO, COLEEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-9129   GALLEGOS-MORALES, ELEUTERO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9131   MANTILLA, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9134   PECK, LANCE, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9135   PUNGITORE, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9138   TILGHMAN, BRADFORD L. V. BESHEARS, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-9139   THOMPSON, ABRAHAM V. USPS<left></p>
<p>

98-9144   USI, FRED V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9146   VERNER, JAMES E. V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-9150   ROMAR, LATRICE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9157   NEILL, DAVID B. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9158   McCLUNG, LOIS A., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9163   NAVA-SALGADO, JORGE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9164   BROWN, ROYCE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9165   BLANCO, JOHN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9168   MICHAEL, BARRY D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9173   MEEKS, VERLE D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9179   PERRONE, NICHOLAS A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9193   WILD, JAMES L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-9196   WILD, JAMES L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.<left></p>
<p>

97-1914   CNN, INC., ET AL. V. BERGER, PAUL, ET UX., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of ABC, Inc., et al. for leave to file a<left></p>
<p>

              brief as <font i="1">amici curiae<font> is granted. The petition for a<left></p>
<p>

              writ of certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-101    McCAFFREY, PATRICIA, ET AL. V. OONA R.-S., ETC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Redwood Empire Schools Insurance<left></p>
<p>

              Group for leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> is<left></p>
<p>

              granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is<left></p>
<p>

              denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-1500   WEST PUBL. CO., ET AL. V. MATTHEW BENDER & CO., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-1519   WEST PUBLISHING CO., ET AL. V. HyperLAW, INC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motions of Malla Pollack for leave to file a<left></p>
<p>

              brief as <font i="1">amicus curiae<font> are granted. The petitions for<left></p>
<p>

              writs of certiorari are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">HABEAS CORPUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-1362   IN RE RALPH RICHARDSON<left></p>
<p>

98-8782   IN RE JOHN MAURICE McNEIL<left></p>
<p>

98-8926   IN RE DARRELL SIGGERS<left></p>
<p>

98-9288   IN RE JEFFREY LAMONT HARRISON-BEY<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are<left></p>
<p>

              denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">MANDAMUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-8736   IN RE IDA M. WILLIAMS LEWIS<left></p>
<p>

98-8880   IN RE MICHELE L. BURNETT<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">REHEARINGS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-6723   PEDONE, JOHN V. DIR., OFFICE OF WORKERS<left></p>
<p>

98-7491   JACKSON, MITCHELL V. WHITTLE, NICHOLAS A., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-7659   CHUMPIA, BAMRUNG P. V. MICHIGAN STATE UNIV.<left></p>
<p>

98-7820   JOHNSON, RICHARD V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-7833   RIVERA, LUCIO G. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

98-7958   LAVERTU, PAUL V. NH SUPREME COURT<left></p>
<p>

98-8196   COLLINS, MARGARET A. vs. APFEL, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE<center></p>
<p style="Normal">D-2044    IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM C. McCALLUM<left></p>
<p>

                   William C. McCallum, of Framingham, Massachusetts,<left></p>
<p>

              having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of<left></p>
<p>

              this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from<left></p>
<p>

              the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law<left></p>
<p>

              before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on<left></p>
<p>

              February 22, 1999, is discharged.<left></p>
<p>

D-2046    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT J. PELLICANE<left></p>
<p>

                   Robert J. Pellicane, of Hauppauge New York, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of March 1, 1999; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              requiring him to show cause why he should not be<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Robert J. Pellicane is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2053    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL SHAFRAN<left></p>
<p>

                   Michael Shafran, of Cleveland, Ohio, having been<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of March 22, 1999; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Michael Shafran is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2054    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WALTER LOUIS SENTEEN, JR.<left></p>
<p>

                   Walter Louis Senteen, Jr., of New Orleans,<left></p>
<p>

              Louisiana, having been suspended from the practice of<left></p>
<p>

              law in this Court by order of March 22, 1999; and a rule<left></p>
<p>

              having been issued and served upon him requiring him to<left></p>
<p>

              show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time<left></p>
<p>

              to file a response having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Walter Louis Senteen, Jr., is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2056    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD STEPHEN WEISS<left></p>
<p>

                   Howard Stephen Weiss, of Franklin Lakes, New<left></p>
<p>

              Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law<left></p>
<p>

              in this Court by order of March 22, 1999; and a rule<left></p>
<p>

              having been issued and served upon him requiring him to<left></p>
<p>

              show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time<left></p>
<p>

              to file a response having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Howard Stephen Weiss is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2058    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL B. JACOBS<left></p>
<p>

                   Daniel B. Jacobs, of Union City, New Jersey, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of March 29, 1999; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Daniel B. Jacobs is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2076    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF P. JULES PATT<left></p>
<p>

                   P. Jules Patt, of Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, is<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a<left></p>
<p>

              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring<left></p>
<p>

              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">RECESS ORDER<center></p>
<p style="Normal">                   The Court will take a recess from Tuesday, <left></p>
<p>

              June 1, 1999, until Monday, June 7, 1999.<left></p>
</section>
</document>