<document>
<doctype type="OTHER">
<docheader>
<DISPOSITION></DISPOSITION>
</docheader>
<section>
<p style="TITLE">(ORDER LIST: 525 U.S.)<left></p>
<p style="Normal"><center><font b="1">MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1998<center></p>
<p style="HEADING1">ORDERS IN PENDING CASES<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-843    DAVIS, AURELIA V. MONROE CTY. BD. OF ED.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">                   The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et<left></p>
<p style="Normal">              al. for leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amici<font> <font i="1">curiae<font> is<left></p>
<p>

              granted. The motion of of the Solicitor General for<left></p>
<p>

              leave to participate in oral argument as <font i="1">amicus<font> <font i="1">curiae<left></p>
<p>

<font>              and for divided argument is granted.<left></p>
<p>

97-1732   CA PUB. EMPLOYS' RETIREMENT V. FELZEN, PAUL, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Public Citizen, Inc., et al. for<left></p>
<p>

              leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amici<font> <font i="1">curiae<font> is granted. The<left></p>
<p>

              motion of Solicitor General for leave to participate in<left></p>
<p>

              oral argument as <font i="1">amicus<font> <font i="1">curiae<font> and for divided argument<left></p>
<p>

              is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the<left></p>
<p>

              consideration or decision of these motions.<left></p>
<p>

97-2000   AM. MFRS. MUTUAL INS., ET AL V. SULLIVAN, DELORES, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-84     NCAA V. SMITH, R. M.<left></p>
<p>

98-85     HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. V. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-97     ANDERSON, ELOISE, ET AL. V. ROE, BRENDA, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-184    WYOMING V. HOUGHTON, SANDRA<left></p>
<p>

                   The motions of Solicitor General for leave to<left></p>
<p>

              participate in oral argument as <font i="1">amicus<font> <font i="1">curiae<font> and for<left></p>
<p>

              divided argument are granted.<left></p>
<p>

98-369    NASA, ET AL. vs. FED. LABOR REL. AUTH., ET AL<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of Solicitor General to dispense with<left></p>
<p>

              printing the joint appendix is granted.<left></p>
<p>

98-436    ALDEN, JOHN, ET AL. V. MAINE<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of the United States for leave to<left></p>
<p>

              intervene is granted.<left></p>
<p>

98-6817   SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. FBI<left></p>
<p>

98-6818   SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CORR.<left></p>
<p>

98-6819   SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMM.<left></p>
<p style="FOOTER">98-6820   SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. NATIONAL ARCHIVES<left></p>
<p style="Normal">                   The motions of petitioner for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma<font> <font i="1">pauperis<font> are denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is<left></p>
<p>

              allowed until January 4, 1999, within which to pay the<left></p>
<p>

              docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit <left></p>
<p>

              petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<left></p>
<p>

              this Court.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI GRANTED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-536    OLMSTEAD, COMMR., GA HUMAN vs. L. C., ETC. ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">CERTIORARI DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-370    SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. V. BEAIRD, MAUDIE, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-390    DePAEPE, MICHAEL K. V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.<left></p>
<p>

98-419    CHRISTOPHER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-439    KIRSH, MARA, ET VIR V. NEW YORK, NY, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-472    GREATER NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. V. PENDERGRASS, ROBERT<left></p>
<p>

98-505    MATHEWS, EDWARD H. V. SEARS PENSION PLAN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-520    PALM, CLARA, ETC. V. LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DEPT.<left></p>
<p>

98-578    COLSTON, LORENZO, ET AL. V. BARNHART, BRYAN<left></p>
<p>

98-603    KERTH, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. HAMOT HEALTH FNDN., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-608    JONES, CLEO, ET AL. V. GA PACIFIC CORP., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-613    PEOPLES BANK AND TRUST CO. V. PENICK, WILSON, ETC.<left></p>
<p>

98-620    STONE CONSOLIDATED, INC. V. M/V KAPETAN, ETC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-623    JERRY K. vs. DAWN D.<left></p>
<p>

98-625    BRADY, JAMES, ET AL. V. OHMAN, SEC. OF ST. OF WY<left></p>
<p>

98-628    SYKES, JOSEPH NOEL V. MINNESOTA<left></p>
<p>

98-629    NEWBURGH, NY, ET AL. V. HOLZAPFEL, JOSEPH<left></p>
<p>

98-642    HIRSCHFELD, ROBERT V. ROGERS, ALFRED, ET UX.<left></p>
<p>

98-648    O'CONNELL, DONALD P., ET AL. V. MILAZZO, ANNMARIE<left></p>
<p>

98-649    LINDQUIST, CARLA V. CONDRA, ALAN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-691    SEBASTIAN, FERNANDO, ET AL. V. MARINECHANCE SHIPPING, LTD.<left></p>
<p>

98-694    MANU, AGNES vs. G. E. CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERV.<left></p>
<p>

98-725    GREASER, EUNICE V. MO DEPT. OF CORRS., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-741    BIXLER, DUANE V. MINNESOTA<left></p>
<p>

98-745    JOHNSON, WILLIAM, ET UX. V. IRS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-748    LESOON, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-755    HADDAD, EMILE V. VA POLYTECHNIC INST., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-768    PATTERSON, JAMES N. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-776    BAIRD, FRANK L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-782    NICHOLS, ROBERT DALE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-785    MANKARIOUS, SAMY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-786    ZAKARIAN, GAREN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-804    CURRIER, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-813    ALEXANDER, PAUL V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-5372   MARMOLEJO, REYNALDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-5444   DURAN, DAVID V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-5598   ROBERTS, DOUGLAS A. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

98-5980   HOWARD, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6012   HAILE, DINKALEM V. INS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-6408   HEMMERLE, KENNETH V. V. ERDMAN, HAROLD H., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-6409   GREIST, RICHARD L. V. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL<left></p>
<p>

98-6411   BUHL, KEVIN L. V. TEXAS<left></p>
<p>

98-6414   WHITE, MAXWELL D. V. OHIO<left></p>
<p>

98-6418   SENA, PAUL V. LYTLE, WARDEN, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-6419   SCHLEEPER, TIMOTHY R. V. CAMPBELL, JUDGE, ETC.<left></p>
<p>

98-6430   CERILLI, RAYMOND V. BARBIERI, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-6443   TURRENTINE, KENNETH E. V. OKLAHOMA<left></p>
<p>

98-6492   JORDAN, GLORIA J. V. JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS, INC.<left></p>
<p>

98-6516   MASON, MAURICE V. OHIO<left></p>
<p>

98-6518   BALDWIN, GWENDOLYN M. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF DC<left></p>
<p>

98-6604   MINK, EARL F. V. GMC<left></p>
<p>

98-6614   SPERRY, EDWARD H. V. CALIFORNIA<left></p>
<p>

98-6622   COLLIE, TROY L. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

98-6705   KELLER, DAVID C. V. LINDSEY, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-6710   MOTTE, GLENN D. vs. U.S. FEDERAL PAROLE OFFICERS<left></p>
<p>

98-6731   COLEMAN, RUSSELL V. CALDERON, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

98-6732   COOKS, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6749   MAZZELL, PAUL V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-6761   MAYBERRY, DOUGLAS G. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6762   MANTILLA, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6765   PERRY, KAREEM V. BENNETT, SUPT.<left></p>
<p>

98-6770   HUTCHINS, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6777   BRAZIEL, LEVI J. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6782   MENDOZA, MAX V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6789   MOSER, ROBERT T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6790   WILLIAMS, JERRY A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6797   SCHWENSOW, RONALD E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6800   SUBER, TOMMIE L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6803   GARCIA, NELSON V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6806   MANSFIELD, WALTER V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6814   UMEGBOLU, CHUKWUNWIEKE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6815   SERANG, GULMOHAMED A. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6816   SWINT, STEVEN L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6823   JACKSON, LEE V. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6826   KNIGHT, NORMAN R. V. DEPT. OF NAVY<left></p>
<p>

98-6827   THOMAS, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6828   BARRON, PERCY V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6831   MATHES, RICHARD D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6832   JUVENILE V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6833   LUCAS, THOMAS D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6834   DAVIS, BURLON R. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6835   ANDINO, ZULMA V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6836   BROWN, CLAUDIO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6853   HERNANDEZ-CASTILLO, BERNARDO V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6855   GONZALEZ, ALPIDIO D. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6857   ZENONE, ANTHONY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6861   TAYLOR, SAMUEL T. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

98-6863   CLARK, MICHAEL L. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-366    McKUNE, WARDEN, ET AL. V. STELTZEN, MARK<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed <font i="1">in<left></p>
<p>

<font>              <font i="1">forma<font> <font i="1">pauperis<font> is granted. The petition for a writ of<left></p>
<p>

              certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-367    HANNIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL. V. STANSBURY, RAYMOND F.<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of respondent Raymond F. Stansbury for<left></p>
<p>

              leave to proceed <font i="1">in<font> <font i="1">forma<font> <font i="1">pauperis<font> is granted. The<left></p>
<p>

              petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-636    SILBERSTEIN, ALAN K., ET AL. V. ZWAAN, KATHLEEN<left></p>
<p>

                   The motion of petitioners to defer consideration of<left></p>
<p>

              the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The<left></p>
<p>

              petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">HABEAS CORPUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">98-6948   IN RE HUMBERTO MORALES<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">MANDAMUS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="FOOTER">98-708    IN RE SCOTT E. STAFNE<left></p>
<p style="Normal">                   The motion of Center for Judicial Accountability<left></p>
<p>

              for leave to file a brief as <font i="1">amicus<font> <font i="1">curiae<font> is granted.<left></p>
<p>

              The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-6484   IN RE GILLERMO BAZUA-AVILES<left></p>
<p>

                   The petition for writ of mandamus and/or<left></p>
<p>

              prohibition is denied.<left></p>
<p style="HEADING1">REHEARINGS DENIED<center></p>
<p style="Normal">97-9251   BAST, RICHARD L. V. GLASBERG, VICTOR M.<left></p>
<p>

97-9351   SATTERWHITE, KENNETH L. V. SMALL, VERNICE, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

97-9456   POWELL, WILLIE B. V. BATTLE, WARDEN<left></p>
<p>

97-9665   BROWN, TRACY B. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ<left></p>
<p>

97-9674   HUMMEL, ROGER V. BACA, JUDGE, ETC.<left></p>
<p>

98-5015   JENNINGS, DAVID V. VAUGHN, SUPT., GRATERFORD<left></p>
<p>

98-5184   RANGEN, STEPHEN V. SEC<left></p>
<p>

98-5400   O'CONNELL, WILLIAM B. V. BACA, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-5632   SMALLEY, JACK W. V. FRANK, SUPT., HUNTINGDON<left></p>
<p>

98-5763   COLON, BILL V. FL COMM. ON ETHICS, ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-5991   PRUNTE, ROBERT R. V. WALT DISNEY CO., ET AL.<left></p>
<p>

98-6076   SWEENEY, CHARLES E. V. UNITED STATES<left></p>
<p>

                   The petitions for rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p>

98-5602   RIVERA, VINCENT F. V. FLORIDA<left></p>
<p>

98-5722   RIVERA, VINCENT F. V. FL DOC<left></p>
<p>

                   The motions for leave to file a petitions for<left></p>
<p>

              rehearing are denied.<left></p>
<p>

<center><font b="1">ATTORNEY<font> <font b="1">DISCIPLINE<center></p>
<p>

<left><font>D-1996    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD L. BRAXTON<left></p>
<p>

                   Harold L. Braxton, of Miami, Florida, having been<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of October 13, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Harold L. Braxton is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1998    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD D. TORPY<left></p>
<p>

                   Richard D. Torpy, of Littleton, Colorado, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of October 13, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Richard D. Torpy is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-1999    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RAYMUNDO CAMPOS QUIROZ<left></p>
<p>

                   Raymundo Campos Quiroz, of Los Angeles, California,<left></p>
<p>

              having been suspended from the practice of law in this<left></p>
<p>

              Court by order of October 13, 1998; and a rule having<left></p>
<p>

              been issued and served upon him requiring him to show<left></p>
<p>

              cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to<left></p>
<p>

              file a response having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that Raymundo Campos Quiroz is<left></p>
<p>

              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2001    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES L. LALIME<left></p>
<p>

                   James L. Lalime, of Williamsville, New York, having<left></p>
<p>

              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by<left></p>
<p>

              order of October 13, 1998; and a rule having been issued<left></p>
<p>

              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he<left></p>
<p>

              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response<left></p>
<p>

              having expired;<left></p>
<p>

                   It is ordered that James L. Lalime is disbarred<left></p>
<p>

              from the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
<p>

D-2002    IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN H. GIFIS<left></p>
<p>

                   Steven H. Gifis, of Pennington, New Jersey, having<left></p>
<p>

              requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this<left></p>
<p>

              Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the<left></p>
<p>

              roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before<left></p>
<p>

              this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on November<left></p>
<p>

              2, 1998, is discharged.<left></p>
<p>

D-2020    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN FITSOS<left></p>
<p>

                   John Fitsos, of Sacramento, California, is<left></p>
<p>

              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a<left></p>
<p>

              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring<left></p>
<p>

              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from<left></p>
<p>

              the practice of law in this Court.<left></p>
</section>
</document>