BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
QUESTION:
How do astronomers estimate or try to count the number of stars
in the Milky Way?
ANSWER from Jim Sweitzer on 27 October 1995:
This is an interesting question because the same method is used to measure
the mass of our earth and sun. Astronomers don't actually count the stars
in the galaxy, they really just try and figure out how much matter there
is in the galaxy. Then, from studying how many stars are of different
types, they can guess what the average mass is for a typical star in the
galaxy. Dividing the average mass into the total mass for the galaxy gives
a rough idea of how many stars there are.
The most important thing is to get the mass of the galaxy. How is that
done? Well, have you ever spun something on a string around in a circle?
If you have, you probably know that the faster you spin the object, the
stronger you feel the string pull on your hand. If you've never done this,
you should try it by tying something attaching a small rubber ball to a
few feet of string and giving it a whirl.
Well, the faster the ball moves in a circle, the stronger the force you
should feel on the string. Basically the same thing happens with stars
orbiting in our galaxy. The stars are like the ball and the "string"
holding the stars in the galaxy is the gravity of the rest of the stars in
the galaxy. The same thing happens with the Space Shuttle orbiting the
earth, but in this case, it is the earth's gravity that keeps it from
zooming off into space.
The circle the whirling ball travels in is the same thing as an orbit.
It's just that for stars in the galaxy, the orbits are enormous. Where it
takes a fraction of a second for the ball on the string to whirl around
your head, it takes about ninety minutes for the space shuttle to orbit the
earth. For a star that orbits the galaxy out where we live, it takes about
250 million years! And the radius of our sun's orbit in the galaxy is
about 600,000,000,000,000,000 miles!
The law of gravity says that the amount of force that keeps something in
orbit depends on how much mass is pulling on the star and how far the star
is from the center of all this mass. I won't go through it here, but when
astronomers work backward from the orbit of the sun and its speed in the
galaxy, they know that there needs to be about 100,000,000,000 times the
mass of our sun to keep it on a steady orbit.
They also know that the sun is a pretty average star. So, if you divide
the mass of the sun (=1 in these units) into the number above, you get
that there are about 100,000,000,000 stars (or 100 billion). Now this
answer is very, very approximate, but is certainly accurate to within a
factor of ten either way.
At one time McDonalds resturants used to list how many hamburgers they
have sold. I remember one time seeing one that said 100 billion sold and I
thought of the number of stars in our galaxy. Now I think they just say,
"billions sold."
I hope all this makes some sense. Thanks for asking.
Schwalme, K., W. C. Mackay and D. Lindner (1985).  Suitability of vertical slot 
and Denil fishways for passing north-temperate, nonsalmonid fish. Canadian 
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.  42:1815-1822.
	
A vertical slot fishway and two Denil fishways (of 10 and 20% slope) built into 
a weir on the Lesser Slave River (55o 18'N, 115o 45'W) were studied from May 12 
to June 25, 1984, to determine how effectively these designs pass north-
temperate, nonsalmonid fishes. Thousands of spottail shiner Notropis hudsonius, 
substantial numbers (> 100) of northern pike Esox lucius, longnose sucker 
Catostomus catostomus, white sucker Catostomus commersoni, immature yellow perch 
Perca flavescens, and lesser numbers of burbot Lota lota, adult yellow perch, 
lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis, and trout-perch Percopsis omiscomaycus 
ascended the fishways. Walleye Stizostedion vitreum and goldeye Hiodon 
alosoides, although probably moving extensively through the river, did not use 
the fishways.
Dear 

I am organizing the seminars of the Theoretical Astrophysics Group at
Fermilab and would like to invite you to visit and give a talk on your
work.

Our seminars are held on Monday afternoons, and the dates we have 
free are available on the schedule at:
http://www-astro-theory.fnal.gov/Seminars/seminars.html

Would you please let me know if you would be interested in visiting us and
which date would suit you best. 

If you are able to come, please also
contact Liz Duty  (duty@fnal.gov, 630-840-3758) regarding your travel
arrangements. We will be able to cover your domestic transportation and local
expenses, only if travel arrangements are made through her.

Best regards,
Pengjie Zhang

------------------------------
Sep.  8   15(Pen)    22  29
Oct.  6(cooray)   13    20  27
Nov.  3(Refregier)   10(reserved)  17(reserved)  24(P.Meszaros)
Dec.  1   8     15

2004

March 1(Richard Ellis)
Adrian Melott <melott@kusmos.phsx.ukans.edu> prefere March, April or May.
Madau, invite next spring.
-----------------------------------------------

Willy Fischer (U.Texas)
Richal Bean (princeton), rbean@astro.princeton.edu

Richard Ellis, rse@astro.caltech.edu, http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~rse/
Observational cosmologist (lensing, SN, galaxy formation
(Not this symester)

Alice Shapeley, Caltech (graduate in 2003), aes@astro.caltech.edu, Lyman-alpha

Daniel Eisenstein, deisenstein@as.arizona.edu, large scale structure
http://cmb.as.arizona.edu/~eisenste/
agree to give a talk  in the SPRING

Mo Houjun, hjmo@nova.astro.umass.edu
IN SPRING

Justin Khoury, inflation, early universe, just graduate, jkhoury@astro.columbia.edu 

Marc Kamionkowski, kamion@tapir.caltech.edu,
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kamion/
(not this symester)

Gianfranco Bertone,http://www2.iap.fr/users/bertone/,bertone@iap.fr

Alexandre Refregier, ar@ast.cam.ac.uk, http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~ar/index.html
(nov. 3)

Andrei Gruzinov,andrei@physics.nyu.edu, high energy astro such as GRB

fan xiao hui, http://sancerre.as.arizona.edu/~fan/,fan@as.arizona.edu
(no)

Pascoli, Silvia, UCLA, post doc., neutrino, lepton, pascoli@physics.ucla.edu

 Asantha Cooray, asante@caltech.edu

Fred Rasio, northwestern u., http://mistral.phys.northwestern.edu/~rasio/
theoretical astrophysics such as globular dynamics, BH, etc.,
rasio@northwestern.edu

George Efstathiou, gpe@ast.cam.ac.uk
http://www.ciar.ca/web/prmem.nsf/0/5b6c273495841c67852567a00064645b?OpenDocument,

Mark Voit, voit@pa.msu.edu

Sara Seager, seager@dtm.ciw.edu, http://www.ciw.edu/seager/
Planet and recombination in the early universe

Hoekstra, Henk  978-8494  1202C  hoekstra@cita.utoronto.ca

Dieter H. Hartmann
Associate Professor
864-656-5298
hdieter@clemson.edu 

Jonathan Feng,jlf @ uci.edu, http://hep.ps.uci.edu/~jlf

Piero Madau, pmadau@ucolick.org,http://www.ucolick.org/~pmadau/

pmcdonal@feynman.princeton.edu

CHARLES R. KEETON II, ckeeton@oddjob.uchicago.edu, strong lensing
http://astro.uchicago.edu/~ckeeton/ (invite next semester)
Loch, J. J. and S. A. Bonar (1999).  Occurrence of grass carp in the Lower 
Columbia and Snake Rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.  
128:374-379.
	
Forty-nine adult grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella were observed migrating 
upriver past Lower Columbia and Snake river hydroelectric dams between August 1, 
1996, and September 30, 1997, representing the first recorded sightings of this 
fish species in this system. From videotape records and visual counts, grass 
carp were estimated to range between 55 and 77 cm in total length (TL). One 7.7-
kg, 86-cm individual captured in a gill net was identified as a sterile 
triploid. Although the source of these fish is unknown, their appearance in the 
Columbia and Snake rivers might have been related to extensive flooding that 
occurred in western Washington and Oregon in February 1996. The unintentional 
escape of grass carp into this large river system reemphasizes the need for the 
current requirement that all grass carp stocked in Pacific Northwest lakes be 
sterile triploids. It also suggests that increased attention to effective 
barrier construction and maintenance is important to prevent grass carp impacts 
in nontarget areas.
DATASET HISTORY.  cpcllfct.dat cpcllfcp.dat
    
    Feb. 16, 1999    Data were interpolated by the INTERGRAPH software.  Borrowing 
rules were used for the non-favored categories such that as follows.
   Given a Probability P for most likely category in the above or below class: 
       Set the opposite category = .6666-P for P.  When P > .6333 then the opposite
category is set to .033.  Some minor variations exist due to interpolation.  The 
INTERGRAPH hardware was removed in June, 1998 so the data record ends on for the forecast
using data through May, 1998.   Forecasts for Lead 1 were digitized manually through
1998.       
    Feb. 15, 2000.   The new data was added to the original probabilities obtained with
 Intergraph interpolation and borrowing rules.  The original data ended with the forecast
labeled 1998 month 4.   The manually interpolated values were removed (the first lead 
from the datasets labeled 1998  month 5 through 1999 month 1) and replaced with the 
probabilities obtained from NTRANS interpolation and transformed-normal distribution
integration to obtain non-favored categories. 
    Feb. 16, 2000  The Precipitation forecasts were found to be in error for the new
months (past those labeled 5/1999). Not yet corrected.  
    March 13, 2000  Precipitation forecasts are corrected.
TITLE:   GCN GRB OBSERVATION REPORT
NUMBER:  429
SUBJECT: GRB 991014 - X-ray afterglow identification by BeppoSAX-NFI
DATE:    99/10/29 14:32:47 GMT
FROM:    Jean int Zand at SRON  <jeanz@sron.nl>

J. in 't Zand, Space Research Organization Netherlands (SRON), 
Utrecht; L.A. Antonelli, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma; L. Kuiper, SRON;
S. Rebecchi, M. Stornelli, D. Ricci, BeppoSAX Science Operations Center, 
Telespazio, Rome; and G. Gandolfi, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR, 
Rome, update the information given in GCN Circ. 427.: "GRB 991014 was 
observed with the Narrow Field Instruments on board BeppoSAX on two 
occasions: Oct. 15.4-16.4 UT (0.5-1.5 d after the burst) and Oct. 
24.8-25.9 (9.9-11.0 d after the burst). In the 2-10 keV images from both 
Medium-Energy Concentrator Spectrometer units 2 and 3, two sources only 
3' apart are within the combined WFC/IPN error regions of the burst (IAUC 
7281, GCN 419). Their positions are R.A. = 6h51m03s, Decl. = +11d36'05" 
(SAX J0651.0+1136 = S1 in GCN 427; Eq. 2000.0; error radius 1.5') and 
R.A. = 6h50m57s, Decl. = +11d33'13" (SAX J0651.0+1133 = S2 in GCN 427; 
error radius 1'). The first source is not detected in the second 
observation. The 3 sigma upper limit translates to a decay by at least a 
factor of 2.2. The second source did not change significantly, the 
intensity change is 10+/-20%. Therefore, we identify SAX J0651.0+1136 as 
the X-ray afterglow of GRB 991014.
TIDAL HARBOURS                 255
between battleships, as was done on the 23rd, the number of vessels that can go out in one tide is limited. It may be recalled that when the squadron put to sea before war was declared the operation took three days. Even after the first losses it was unable to put to sea at one tide, and can only accomplish this feat to-day in five hours with the utmost difficulty.
These figures, assuming them to be correct, are exceedingly interesting, since they show that Port Arthur labours under the same disadvantages as many tidal harbours belonging to our European neighbours, and we are able for the first time to obtain positive proof of the grave defects of harbours of this character in time of war. To those who have studied these questions the facts are well known, but they are not known to the great body of the public. Warships coming out of tidal harbours can only do so at hours that can be exactly calculated by the enemy. When outside they must depart singly or await the appearance of their consorts. In the first case they can be attacked singly, and in the second they are exposed to the incidents we have witnessed at Port Arthur. If for any cause daylight is considered essential, the darkness may supervene before the squadron is ready to sail, or before the tide serves for return. In any case the ships at anchor are vuhierable to torpedo boats by night and to submarines by day or night. Questions like these are among the practical difficulties of naval warfare and acts of invasion from over-sea, and it is useful that our attention should be directed to them.
"Series 1. General Correspondence. 1833-1916.<br>William S. Rosecrans to John P. Sanderson, Saturday, April 02, 1864  (Sanderson's conduct at Chickamauga; endorsed by Sanderson)","mal/mal1","320/3206100","001.gif","1","1","","001.jpg"
"Series 1. General Correspondence. 1833-1916.<br>William S. Rosecrans to John P. Sanderson, Saturday, April 02, 1864  (Sanderson's conduct at Chickamauga; endorsed by Sanderson)","mal/mal1","320/3206100","002.gif","2","2","","002.jpg"
"Series 1. General Correspondence. 1833-1916.<br>William S. Rosecrans to John P. Sanderson, Saturday, April 02, 1864  (Sanderson's conduct at Chickamauga; endorsed by Sanderson)","mal/mal1","320/3206100","003.gif","3","3","","003.jpg"
INFORMATION BULLETIN (03-103)                    				December 29, 2003     
 Sustainable Fisheries Division                        			10:00 a.m.
 907-586-7228                           

                 
               
                  NMFS ANNOUNCES PENDING REVISIONS TO TABLE 2 SPECIES CODES

                                
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces that a revised Table 2 of 50 CFR Part
679 will be posted on December 31, 2003, according to James W. Balsiger, Administrator,
Alaska Region, NMFS.  Table 2 lists species codes.  The revisions to this table will be codified
soon in regulations.   Participants are encouraged to use these codes prior to codification to
ensure consistency of codes in the database for 2004. 

Table 2 is reformatted into 4 subtables.  Table 2a is entitled, "a.  FMP Groundfish Species," and
contains the groundfish species that are managed under a Fishery Management Plan (FMP
groundfish).  

Species codes in Table 2a must be recorded and reported in NMFS logbooks and
forms. 
 
     -Species code 702, is added to Table 2a to describe Big Skate.  Skate Guide can be 
	found at http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/infobulletins/Raja_poster.jpg.

     -Species code 700 in Table 2a is revised to say "Skate, other (if longnose or big 
	skate, use specific species code)."
  
     -Species code 689 in Table 2a is revised to say "Sharks, other (if salmon, spiny 
	dogfish or Pacific sleeper shark, use specific species code)." 
 
     -Species code 120 "miscellaneous flatfish" is added to Table 2a. 
 
     -The Latin names for all individual rockfish species are added to Table 2a.

Table 2b is entitled, "b. Prohibited Species," and contains the prohibited species that are
identified as prohibited under a Fishery Management Plan.  Species codes in Table 2b must be recorded 
and reported in NMFS logbooks and forms. 
 
     -Species code 932 in Table 2b is revised to say "Opilio (snow) tanner crab." 
  
     -Species code 923 in Table 2b is revised to say "Golden king (brown) crab."

Table 2c is entitled, "c. FMP Forage fish," and contains forage fish species that are managed
under a Fishery Management Plan.  Species codes in Table 2c must be recorded and reported in
NMFS logbooks and forms.

Table 2d is entitled, "d. Non-FMP Species Codes," and contains species codes agreed upon by
ADF&G and NMFS Alaska Region for use on ADF&G fish tickets as well as NMFS logbooks
and forms.  The non-FMP species include species that are frequently caught in association with
FMP species.  These species codes may be recorded in NMFS logbooks and forms but are not
required by regulations at 50 CFR part 679.  

 
     -Species code 112, is added to Table 2d for the species, Pacific hake.  

     -Species code 961 in Table 2d is revised to say "Northern (pink) shrimp."

Group species codes are removed:  144, slope rockfish; 168, demersal shelf rockfish; 169,
pelagic shelf rockfish; and 171, shortraker/rougheye rockfish.  See: Guide to Rockfishes 
of the Northeast Pacific Ocean (Large 2.7 MB file). http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/race/media/
publications/archives/pubs2000/techmemo117.pdf
TITLE:   GCN CIRCULAR
NUMBER:  8852
SUBJECT: GRB 090126: SuperAGILE Localization of a Long GRB
DATE:    09/01/26 08:35:37 GMT
FROM:    Marco Feroci at IASF/INAF  <feroci@iasf-roma.inaf.it>

Y. Evangelista, E. Del Monte, I. Donnarumma, M. Feroci, F. Lazzarotto, L. 
Pacciani, P. Soffitta, E. Costa, I. Lapshov, M. Rapisarda (INAF/IASF 
Rome), A. Giuliani, S. Vercellone, A. Chen, S. Mereghetti, A. Pellizzoni, 
F. Perotti, P. Caraveo (INAF/IASF Milan), A. Bulgarelli, F. Gianotti, M. 
Trifoglio, G. Di Cocco, C. Labanti, F. Fuschino, M. Marisaldi, M. Galli, 
(INAF/IASF Bologna), M. Tavani, G. Pucella, F. D'Ammando, V. Vittorini, A. 
Argan, A. Trois, G. Piano, S. Sabatini (INAF/IASF Rome), G. Barbiellini, 
F. Longo E. Moretti (INFN Trieste), P. Picozza, A. Morselli (INFN Roma-2), 
M. Prest, E. Vallazza (Universita` dell'Insubria), P. Lipari, D. Zanello 
(INFN Roma-1), and P. Giommi, C. Pittori, B. Preger, P. Santolamazza, F. 
Verrecchia (ASDC) and L. Salotti (ASI), on behalf of the AGILE Team, 
report:

"SuperAGILE detected a gamma ray burst on 26 January 2009, at 02:01:15 UT.
The event had a duration of about 60 s in the 20-60 keV energy range,
with a structure composed of two separated main peaks. Assuming a 
Crab-like energy spectrum, the peak flux on 1-s timescale was 1.5E-07 
erg/cm2/s.
The burst position was reconstructed  as (RA, Dec)
(3.848 deg, 81.365 deg), which is:

RA(J2000)  = 00h 15m 23.50s
Dec(J2000) = 81d 21' 53.78"

with an uncertainty of 3' radius. The given uncertainty accounts
for both the statistical and systematic errors.

An analysis of the AGILE Gamma Ray Imager (GRID) data is in progress."

This message may be cited.
Salary Table 2003-MFL
	INCORPORATING THE 3.10% GENERAL SCHEDULE INCREASE AND A LOCALITY PAYMENT OF 13.81%
                 FOR THE LOCALITY PAY AREA OF MIAMI-FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
		
                                (Total Increase: 4.35%)

                                Effective January 2003

                             Annual Rates by Grade and Step

GS     1          2         3         4         5        6          7        8        9       10

1     17315     17893     18469     19042     19619     19958     20524    21098    21122    21659
2     19468     19930     20576     21122     21359     21987     22615    23243    23872    24500
3     21241     21949     22657     23365     24073     24781     25489    26197    26905    27613
4     23845     24640     25434     26229     27023     27817     28612    29406    30201    30995
5     26679     27568     28457     29346     30235     31124     32012    32901    33790    34679
6     29739     30730     31721     32712     33704     34695     35686    36678    37669    38660
7     33047     34149     35250     36352     37454     38555     39657    40759    41860    42962
8     36599     37819     39039     40259     41479     42699     43919    45139    46359    47579
9     40424     41772     43119     44467     45814     47162     48509    49857    51204    52552
10    44517     46001     47485     48969     50453     51937     53421    54905    56389    57874
11    48911     50542     52173     53804     55435     57065     58696    60327    61958    63589
12    58621     60575     62529     64484     66438     68392     70346    72300    74254    76208
13    69710     72034     74358     76682     79006     81330     83654    85978    88302    90626
14    82377     85123     87869     90616     93362     96108     98854    101600    104347    107093
15    96898     100128     103358     106588     109818    113047    116277   119507   122737   125967
Neil Carman <neil_carman@greenbuilder.com> 
03/30/2008 08:02 PM	To
	<rcra-docket@epa.gov>rcra-docket@epa.gov
	cc
	
	bcc
	
	Subject
	June 17, 1996 Petitioners opening brief
	
	
Sierra Club
March 30, 2008
Stephen Johnson
Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket Center
Via electronic submission at <rcra-docket@epa.gov>
Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0123
Re: Copy of June 17, 1996 Petitioners Opening Brief on a previous EPA TSCA 
Import Exemption for
S.D. Myers to import PCBs and send liquid PCB waste to commercial 
hazardous waste incinerators
Dear Administrator Johnson:
Public comments on EPA's Proposed TSCA Import Exemption rule for Veolia to 
import PCBs for incineration
include a copy of June 17, 1996 Petitioners Opening Brief on a previous 
EPA TSCA Import Exemption for
S.D. Myers to import PCBs and send liquid PCB waste to commercial 
hazardous waste incinerators.
Sincerely,
Neil J. Carman, Ph.D.
Clean air program director
Lone Star Chapter of Sierra Club
1202 San Antonio Street
Austin, Texas 78701
tel: 512-472-1767
fax: 512-477-8526
Neil_Carman@greenbuilder.com
From:      JIM BREEDEN <75066.770@compuserve.com>
To:        FCC <kidstv@fcc.gov,>
Date:      11/28/95 12:11am
Subject:   TELEVISION REGULATION

Dear Sir:

We strongly support regulations for television licensing renewal
based on the the following:
    - providing non-violent, decent educational programming (10
hours per week
       during "child" hours.)
    - producing and airing community service ads and
announcements
    - limiting violent and sexually explicit programming after
school, on
Saturday
       mornings and between 7 and 9 P.M.

Television needs to be teaching our children life-giving values
such as:
    - honesty
    - patience
    - compassion
    - responsibility
    - integrity
    - self-discipline,  etc.

Television has become a primary educator of our children.  It
must take responsibility for its actions and for the consequences
of its programming on our society.

We disagree with Richard Cotton, NBC's  chief counsel when he
says, "We... should not want the government to be the arbiter of
what's on T.V. "  No one else has that ability and the medium has
been raising our children too long on a diet of materialism,
promiscuity and violence.

Please consider seriously making these requirements mandatory for
license renewals.

          Sincerely,    Dr. and Mrs. James Breeden
                                1775 Chaparral
                                Carson City, NV 89703
                                Compuserve e-mail    James
Breeden 75066,770
IFIX Picture Guidelines                      11/30/00  RLS

Displays
1.   The background should be light tan for information
  pages and light blue for menus.  Other pale colors may be
  used to denote specific subjects.
2.   Minimize the use of colors, and make them mean
  something.
3.   Simple common shapes will be used to depict equipment.
4.   Select the valve or equipment itself to dive into
  detailed information.
5.   Pipelines passing between pages will be matched in
  color and location.
6.   Avoid garish colors.
7.   Meanings should be assigned to no more than seven to
  nine colors.  If more than the basic three, then a legend
  should be readily available.
  a.   red is alarm
  b.   green is on
  c.   orange is off
8.   Avoid small blue shapes or blue text.
9.   Text should be black (preferred) or white.
10.  Except for acronyms and tag names, text should be upper
  and lower case.
11.  Align rows and columns.
12.  Pictures should not be too busy, at least 70%
  background.
13.  Display information graphically rather than textually
  if possible.
14.  Use simple text fonts, large enough to read easily from
  four feet.
15.  Read the paper Good Screen Design by Rothrock and
  Martz.


Common Items
1.   A small, gray menu button on each page should return to
  the system menu.
2.   A small CDF logo button in the upper left or upper
  right should return to one of the two main menus.
3.   Daughter screens shall have a close button.  It should
  be labeled Close and located in the upper right.
4.   The date and time will be displayed at the upper left
  of each picture.
5.   Each picture should have a large title at the top
  center.
6.   Each picture should have an icon showing that updates
  are being made.


1.   The goals are readability and ease of operation.
2.   Picture hierarchy, storage location, etc. are not
  addressed.
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0001.gif","1","1","","0001.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0002.gif","2","2","","0002.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0003.gif","3","3","","0003.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0004.gif","4","4","","0004.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0005.gif","5","5","","0005.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0006.gif","6","6","","0006.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0007.gif","7","7","","0007.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0008.gif","8","8","","0008.jpg"
"The Secret Experiments of the Wright Brothers [Victor Longhand, Popular Mechanics]","05","05004491","0009.gif","9","9","","0009.jpg"
From shura at bnl.gov  Wed Jan 23 01:57:40 2002
From: shura at bnl.gov (Alexander Bazilevsky)
Date: Mon Dec 29 17:10:09 2003
Subject: [Phenix-bnl-journal-club] Thursday lunch seminar
Message-ID: <3C4E5EE3.ED7E6DC6@bnl.gov>

Hello,
This coming Thursday is my turn to organize journal club lunch. I'm
going to discuss the paper nucl-th/108048 (v2): "Generalized scaling of
the transverse mass spectrum at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider" by
Jurgen Schaffner-Bielich et. al.
It'll take place in Orange room at noon. Please send me your lunch
orders before 10 am Jan. 24 by e-mail or phone (x3712).

The menu is located at
http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/~marzia/benten/

Regards,

Sasha.



From shura at bnl.gov  Thu Jan 24 12:39:10 2002
From: shura at bnl.gov (Alexander Bazilevsky)
Date: Mon Dec 29 17:10:09 2003
Subject: [Phenix-bnl-journal-club] Thursday lunch seminar
References: <3C4E5EE3.ED7E6DC6@bnl.gov>
Message-ID: <3C5046BD.8C7F8A7C@bnl.gov>

Good morning,
At the moment I've got lunch orders from Gerry, Abbay, Saskia, Brant and
Mike. If anyont else is going to make an order, please, call (x3712) or
come (2-74) - I'm waiting for another 20 minutes (untill 10 am).

See you in Orange room at noon.

Regards,

Sasha.


Alexander Bazilevsky wrote:

> Hello,
> This coming Thursday is my turn to organize journal club lunch. I'm
> going to discuss the paper nucl-th/108048 (v2): "Generalized scaling of
> the transverse mass spectrum at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider" by
> Jurgen Schaffner-Bielich et. al.
> It'll take place in Orange room at noon. Please send me your lunch
> orders before 10 am Jan. 24 by e-mail or phone (x3712).
>
> The menu is located at
> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/~marzia/benten/
>
> Regards,
>
> Sasha.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phenix-bnl-journal-club mailing list
> Phenix-bnl-journal-club@phyppro1.phy.bnl.gov
> http://phyppro1.phy.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phenix-bnl-journal-club
Federal Trade Commission
Received Documents
July 24, 1995
B18354900277

  July 20, 1995
FTC
Office of the Secretary
"Made in the USA"

Gentlemen:

To me "Made in the USA" means all components were made in the USA and the item was
assembled in the USA.  Otherwise the label should read "XXXX from Mexico - Assembled in the
USA" or "XXX made in the USA, assembled in Mexico".  I prefer to buy "Made in the USA",
next I prefer to buy if components are made in USA or the item was assembled in the USA.  The
only time I buy an item that is 100% import is when it's cheap as dirt!!!

Helen B. Dalton
268 Hokes Place
Lilburn, GA 30247
Monday, September 26, 2005

	Today N43RF flew the post-Rita Gulf survey pattern.  A total of 55 AXBT's were 
dropped, and 52 worked well.  This should provide valuable information about the 
response of the ocean to the passage of two major hurricanes in a three-week time period.
	The tropical wave in the Caribbean looks a little less organized today (Fig. 200).  
Infrared imagery shows a predominantly linear organization to the convection on the 
northwest side, with disorganized cold cloud tops trailing the line south of Hispaniola.  
QuikScat image (Fig. 201) does not show any significant circulation underneath the 
convection.  Vertical shear is still relatively low, however (Fig. 202), so it is still possible 
that this system could develop as it progresses toward the west and northwest.
	
 

Figure 200.  GOES-East infrared image valid 1315 UTC September 26.
 

Figure 201.  QuikScat surface winds (barbs, kt) valid 1346 UTC September 26.

 

Figure 202.  CIMSS-derived 850-200 hPa vertical shear (contours, kt) valid 09 UTC 
September 26.
Comment 0412415

From: PKRDBetsy@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:50 PM
To: Rulemaking, TTB
Subject: Notice No. 41: Labeling and Advertising of Wines, Distilled
Spirits and Malt Beverages

U.S.  TTB
 

Dear U.S.  TTB,

I believe that information like serving size and alcohol per serving should be provided on beer, wine and spirits packages.
However, the federal government is not currently allowing voluntary disclosure of this factual information on bottles. 

Information on product content is required to be printed on the packaging for food, nonalcohol beverages, medicines and even dietary supplements. There is no reason that alcoholic beverages should be precluded from this group. Some may argue that it is even more important than many other consumable products as it would foster responsible decision making.

I urge you to allow companies that make and sell beer, wine and spirits to include basic serving facts on their labels. 

Thank you very much for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Betsy Williams
P.O. Box 1802
Shingle Springs, California 95682-1802
 cc: 
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Senator Barbara Boxer
Representative John Doolittle
Director Jerry Jolly
FXUS62 KTAE 031715
AFDTLH

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TALLAHASSEE FL
115 PM EDT FRI OCT 3 2003

.OVERVIEW...HIGH PRESSURE CONTINUES TO HOLD TO THE NE OF THE CWA 
...YIELDING A MOSTLY SUNNY AND DRY AFTERNOON ACROSS THE AREA. OVER 
THE COASTAL WATERS...THE PRESSURE GRADIENT CONTINUES TO RELAX WITH 
THE NE WINDS GENERALLY DROPPING INTO THE 10 TO 15 KT RANGE. 

.SHORT TERM...THE NEXT SERIES OF SHORTWAVES ARE BEGINNING TO CARVE 
OUT OVER THE MID MS VALLEY...IN RESPONSE TO THE MASSIVE UPPER LOW 
BETWEEN THE NORTHERN GREAT LAKES AND HUDSON BAY. THE FIRST IMPULSE 
WILL PASS WELL TO THE N OF THE CWA ON SATURDAY...WHILE THE SECOND 
ONE WILL DIG MUCH FURTHER TO THE SE AND WILL HELP INITIATE THE COLD 
FRONTAL PASSAGE ON MONDAY. AS MENTIONED IN THE EXTENDED...THE SHORT 
RANGE MODELS CONTINUE TO DE-AMPLIFY THE UPPER LEVEL PATTERN OVER THE 
SE U.S. WHICH WILL RESULT IN THE THRUST OF THE COOLER AND DRIER AIR 
BEHIND THE FRONT TO BYPASS THE REGION TO THE N. WITH THE DELAY IN 
THE FRONTAL PASSAGE...NOW EXPECT A DRY DAY SATURDAY...WILL TRIM BACK 
POPS TO ISOLATED ON SUNDAY...AND WILL RAISE THEM ON SUNDAY NIGHT AND 
MONDAY. NEVERTHELESS...30 PERCENT SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE 
HIGHEST POPS FOR THE PERIOD ON MONDAY. 

.MARINE...WITH FURTHER WEAKENING OF THE PRESSURE GRADIENT 
FCST...EXPECT WINDS AND SEAS TO DECREASE AND REMAIN LIGHT FOR THE 
NEXT FEW DAYS. SHOULD SEE SOME INCREASE IN WINDS AND SEAS BEHIND THE 
NEXT FRONT EARLY NEXT WEEK.

.FIRE WX...WITH INCREASING LOW LEVEL MOISTURE OVER THE NEXT COUPLE 
OF DAYS...RELATIVE HUMIDITIES SHOULD REMAIN WELL ABOVE CRITERIA.

.EXTENDED...IN ADDITION TO DELAYING THE FRONTAL PASSAGE UNTIL 
MONDAY...THE GFS HAS NOW FURTHER DE-AMPLIFIED THE UPPER LEVEL 
PATTERN. THIS WILL NOW LIKELY RESULT IN THE BRUNT OF THE COOLER AND 
DRIER AIR BEHIND THE FRONT BUILDING EASTWARD WITH THE SFC RIDGE AND 
NOT SOUTHWARD...SO ENDED UP RAISING TEMPS QUITE A BIT FROM MID WEEK 
ON...ESPECIALLY LOWS. BY NEXT FRIDAY...THE GFS IS ALSO SHOWING VERY 
RAPID MOISTURE RETURN FROM THE SE...BUT WILL NOT JUMP ON THIS 
SOLUTION UNTIL MORE CONSISTENCY IS SHOWN...AND THE FATE OF ANY OF 
LARRY'S REMAINING MOISTURE CAN BE MORE ACCURATELY DETERMINED.

.PRELIMINARY POINT TEMPS/POPS...

TLH 59 87 61 87 / 00 00 00 10
PFN 62 85 67 86 / 00 00 00 10
DHN 60 83 62 86 / 00 00 05 10
ABY 56 84 60 84 / 00 00 05 10
VLD 57 86 62 87 / 00 00 00 10
CTY 60 86 62 86 / 00 00 00 10

.TLH WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES...
AL...NONE.
GA...NONE.
FL...NONE.

$$

GOULD
U~-frc~ ~
100104

~LAV~RY~ DAYSjJ~D AFTE~


	I, ~e Liarshal Butler, e4.~-~t years o~d and was oorn on December 25. I knows it was Christmas Day for I was a ~ to my foL~s. Anyhow,ise the only niggah that knows exactly how old he be. I disremernbers the :~ear but you white 1~olks can figure et out.

lily mammy was Harriet Butler and my pappy was John Butler and we all was raised in ~7ashin~ton~~iilke s.

L~arnmy was a Frank Collar nig~ah and her man war of the tribe of Ben Butler, some miles down de road. Et weZ one of dem trial marriages - they~se tried so hard to see each other but. old ?en Butler says two passes a

week war enuff to see my mammy on de Collar plantation. mien de war was completed pappy c~nie home to us r ~ WU~ a family of ten - four females called Sally, Liza, Ellen and Lottie and six stron bucks called Charlie, Elisha, i:Iarshal, Jack, Hey..~ wood and little Johnnie, ~a~ew~ de baby.

	De Collar plantation wuz bi~ and I dont know de size of it. Et must have been bi~ for dere war

f~~ ni~ahs aching to ~o to work  I ~~uess they must have been aching after de work wuz done. Marse Frank bossed the place hisseif ~ aere war no overseers. ~ raised cotton, corn,
import java.awt.*;
import java.applet.*;
import java.awt.Toolkit;

/**--------------------------------------------------------
// This file is called TemplateApplet.java
1) One public class per Java file and IT MUST be the name
of the file.
2) Must import java.awt and java.applet
3) init/start are suggested
4) TemplateApplet is just a name, it can be anything

Please use AppletGen(if you can) to generate more advanced
applet skeletons to save typing.
--------------------------------------------------------*/
public class Test extends Applet
{
	int bob=0;
	TextField txt;
        public void init()
        {
		Image image;
                showStatus("init() was called");
		txt = new TextField("default",20);
		add(txt);
		txt.setText("testing");
		image =  Toolkit.getImage("duke.gif");
        }

        public void start()
        {
		bob=1;
                showStatus("start() was called");
		
        }

	void minit(){ bob=1;}

	public void main(String args[]) {
                Frame f = new Frame("Test");
                Test test = new Test();

		minit();
                test.init();
                f.add("Center", test);
                f.resize(400, 200);
                f.show();
        }

        public void stop()
        {
                showStatus("stop() was called");
        }

        public void destroy()
        {
                showStatus("destroy() was called");
        }
}
October 12, 2000
SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL K. POWELL
In the Matter of Amendment of Section 19.735-203 of the Commission's Rules
Concerning Nonpublic Information Order
	This Order would seem to help curtail the flood of document leaks out of this
Commission, but no rule change will have any effect on this endemic problem unless we
vigorously enforce our own internal rules and tighten our document handling procedures.
	The regular pattern of leaks of pre-decisional written material is intolerable.  They
damage the deliberative prerogatives of the individual Commissioners and impair the
integrity of the entire agency.  This brief Order is part of the solution and I support it.
This rule change imposes responsibilities on certain outside parties to help the FCCs
Inspector General appropriately retrieve written materials that are leaked.  And, the new
rule subjects such outside parties to possible disciplinary action.  This step could help
prevent a wider dissemination of our pre-decisional documents after they have left the
premises, but I have to admit that the change does little to plug the dike in the first place.
	We need stronger enforcement of our current rules, including a zero tolerance
policy for all leaks.  Outside partiesincluding the press which are correctly excluded
from this new rulewho entice our valuable employees to leak non-public information
should be on notice as to the peril in which they are placing their moles.  Likewise, our
employees must be well informed and educated about their responsibilities and their fate
should they disclose non-public information without proper authorization. This item
notifies everyone inside and outside the Commission of the possible consequences.  I
would also suggest that, to the extent that there is evidence that outside parties are
obtaining non-public materials by other means not involving FCC employees directly or
knowingly, appropriate law enforcement officials should be called in immediately.
	But, it will also take more than disciplinary actions or threat of such actions
against persons inside and outside of the Commission.  I agree with Commission
Furchtgott-Roth that it will take a change in the culture that has come now to expect such
unauthorized disclosures as the way things are done.
	I, therefore, not only support the rule changes in this Order, but I have joined the
Chairman and my colleagues in requesting the Inspector General and the Managing
Director closely and expeditiously examine the Commissions internal management of
nonpublic information.  I plan to personally and substantially involve myself in this task.
We need strong enforcement, disciplinary action and preventative measures to make any
headway toward shifting expectations and the culture of the handling of non-public
deliberative materials and information.
	To paraphrase Donny Osmond, one bad apple should not spoil the whole bunch.
We have got a great group of employees who are very loyal and dedicated to this agency
and I am not placing blame at any level.  This is an institutional problem that needs fixing
and we need the help of all parties both inside and outside the agency.
- FCC -
Beth Schmid
Headquarters, Washington, DC                                      April 27, 1999
(Phone:  202/358-1760)

NOTE TO EDITORS:  N99-25

WINNING STUDENTS TAKE THE PRIZE IN WASHINGTON 

     Forty high school students and their teachers from around the country 
have earned all-expense-paid trips to Washington, DC, this week 
for winning the NASA Student Involvement Program's academic competition.

     The students will present their winning projects on Saturday, May 1, at the 
Hotel Washington, 515 15th St. NW, Washington, DC. All events will be open to the 
press.

     From 10:15 a.m. to noon EDT and 1 p.m. to 2:15 p.m. EDT, seven regional high 
school winners in each of the three categories --  "Designing a Mission to Mars," 
"Watching Earth Change" and "Aeronautics and Space Science Journalism" -- will 
present their proposals. Immediately afterward, there will be an informal poster 
session, allowing the press to have one-on-one discussions with the students.

     Reporters are welcome to attend the students' presentations in the hotel's 
meeting rooms.  The "Designing a Mission to Mars" winners will be in the 
Washington Room, "Watching Earth Change" winners in the Federal Room and 
"Aeronautics and Space Science Journalism" winners in the Capital Room.

     The competition is designed to increase student literacy in science, 
critical and creative thinking, mathematics and technology.  More than 3,000 
students in elementary, junior high and high school competed.  The competition 
was conducted for NASA by TERC, an educational organization, the Institute of 
Global Environmental Strategies and WT Chen & Company. 

      In addition to presenting their research projects, students will meet with 
their Congressional representatives on Capitol Hill and participate in other 
activities.  

     A complete list of NSIP high school winners and information on other grade 
level participation and awards can be found at the following URL:

http://www.nsip.net

-end-
From:	Malone, Kelly
Sent:	Monday, December 08, 2003 3:19 PM
To:	Crim, Carol H
Cc:	Acker, Rita G; Sheehy, Janice; Reuther, Mary-Lacey; Hayes, Alta; Sliva, Clara - OC; Mungo, Indya; Butler, Jennie C; John Gordon; Peter Salsbury; Renee Wheeler; Shirelle Owens
Subject:	FYI Correspondence; Trac #:  0305960 (Citizens' Petition - Low-Carbs/Obesity)

Importance:	High
Attached is correspondence which is FYI, as noted on the control sheet.  

If you need additional information, please call the ExecSec Contact listed on the control sheet.

Thank You, FDA/OC Executive Secretariat

 
TO:  ARK MCCLELLAN, FDA - COMMISSIONER
FROM: C. MANLY MOLPUS, GMA, GROCERY MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
SYNOPSIS: WRITES CONCERNING SUBMITTING CITIZENS PETITION OUTLINING GMAS
AS FIRST ANNOUNCED DURING GMAS TESTIMONY BEFORE THE FDA OBESITY
WORKING GROUP ON OCTOBER 23,2003.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DEFINITION OF A LOW-CARBOHYDRATE CLAIM,
LEAD OFFICE: HF-1  FYI
From: goldsand@attglobal.net
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:10 PM
To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov
Subject: Irradiation Labeling, Docket No 98N-1038



Food and Drug Administration, Dockets Management Branch
5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20857

Dear Food and Drug Administration, Dockets Management Branch,


Dear Commissioner Schwetz: 

When it comes to the food that I eat, I want to know
exactly what it is and exactly how it has been treated.
 I want irradiated foods to be clearly and conspicuously
labeled so that any consumer knows exactly what they
are purchasing.  "Irradiation" is a commonly understood
term that the FDA should not discard for a deceptive
substitute. 

I am certain that I am not the only one who feels this
way. In fact, all of the people I have ever talked
to about this subject, are strongly opposed to even
trying irradiated foods.  Furthermore, an independent
opinion poll in 1999, commissioned by the American
Association of Retired Persons and the Center for Science
in the Public Interest (I subscribe to their magazine
to keep myself well informed), showed overwhelming
support for the term "Treated by Irradiation," instead
of "Electronically Pasteurized" or "Cold Pasteurized."
  The term "pasteurized" means - to probably about
99% of all consumers - something similar to how milk
is processed, yet our milk is not "irradiated"!!! Someone
out there - or some organization - is trying to trick
us once again, and this is a scary prospect to me!!!
 It's right up there with genetically messing with
our corn and other whole foods!  Just as consumers
want label information about "dolphin-safe tuna" or
"low fat" foods, they also want clear information on
 irradiated food.  Most definitely! 

Please do not change the change the current sensible,
understandable label. 
Informed choice is part of a free-market economy. 
Some shoppers want to buy irradiated foods because
they want foods with lower pathogen risks. Other shoppers
may avoid irradiated foods because of changes in taste,
smell, texture, or nutrition, or for other reasons.
 The FDA should not stand in the way of consumers making
these choices by putting confusing, hard-to-understand
new labels on irradiated food.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter. 




Sincerely,


Lynne Goldsand
P.O. Box 701
Poughquag, New York 12570
Expires:200902151200;;052764
FPUS56 KPQR 150516
ZFPPQR
ZONE FORECASTS NORTHWEST OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PORTLAND OREGON
915 PM PST SAT FEB 14 2009
SPOT TEMPERATURES AND PROBABILITIES OF MEASURABLE PRECIPITATION
ARE FOR TONIGHT...SUNDAY...SUNDAY NIGHT...PRESIDENTS DAY...MONDAY
NIGHT...AND TUESDAY.

ORZ003-004-151200-
COAST RANGE OF NORTHWEST OREGON-CENTRAL COAST RANGE OF WESTERN
OREGON-
INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...JEWELL...VERNONIA...SUNSET SUMMIT...LEES
CAMP...GRANDE RONDE...BURNT WOODS...SWISSHOME...VENETA
915 PM PST SAT FEB 14 2009
.TONIGHT...CLOUDY. RAIN OR SNOW DEVELOPING SOUTH. A CHANCE OF RAIN OR
SNOW NORTH AFTER MIDNIGHT. SNOW LEVEL 2000 FEET. SNOW ACCUMULATION 1
TO 3 INCHES. LOWS 30 TO 35. EAST WIND 10 TO 15 MPH.
.SUNDAY...RAIN...DECREASING SOUTH IN THE AFTERNOON. SNOW LEVEL 2500
FEET. SNOW ACCUMULATION 1 TO 3 INCHES. HIGHS 40 TO 45. EAST WIND 10
TO 20 MPH.
.SUNDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. LOWS 30 TO
35. EAST WIND 5 TO 15 MPH.
.PRESIDENTS DAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. HIGHS 45 TO
50. NORTHEAST WIND 5 TO 15 MPH.
.MONDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. SNOW LEVEL
2500 FEET. LOWS AROUND 35. NORTHEAST WIND 10 MPH.
.TUESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. HIGHS 40 TO 45.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. LOWS AROUND
35.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. HIGHS AROUND
45.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. LOWS
AROUND 35.
.THURSDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. HIGHS 45 TO 50.
.THURSDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. LOWS AROUND
35.
.FRIDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SHOWERS. HIGHS 45 TO 50.
.FRIDAY NIGHT...RAIN LIKELY. LOWS AROUND 35.
.SATURDAY...RAIN LIKELY. HIGHS 45 TO 50.
$$
=
ZCZC NFDSPENES ALL
SPENES
WYZ000-UTZ000-
.
SATELLITE PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES..DATE/TIME 07/22/08 2351Z
SATELLITE ANALYSIS BRANCH/NESDIS---NPPU---TEL.301-763-8678
LATEST DATA USED: GOES-11: 2341Z		DS
.
LOCATION...SW WYOMING...NE UTAH...
.
ATTN WFOS...RIW...GJT...SLC...
ATTN RFCS...CBRFC...
.
EVENT...STNRY CELL OVER UINTA COUNTY
.
SATELLITE ANALYSIS AND TRENDS...IR SHOWS CLUSTER OF CELLS SHOWING LITTL E
IF ANY MOVEMENT DURING THE PAST HR MOSTLY OVER S/E UINTA COUNTY BUT ALSO
AFFECTING PARTS OF SWEETWATER AND SUMMIT COUNTY/UT. IR SHOWS AN OUTFLOW
BNDRY FROM A PREVIOUS STORM TO THE N THAT IS EXPANDING WWD. CLUSTER
OVER UINTA COUNTY IS PINNED ALONG THIS OUTFLOW AND MAY START BACKBUILD
TO THE W AS THE BNDRY PROGRESSES INTO RICH/MORGAN/SUMMIT/ COUNTIES IN
UT. SOUNDER PW VALUES CONTINUE TO INDICATE .8-1" PW'S IN N UT/SW WY THAT
MAY INCREASE SLIGHTLY TO THE E INTO S CENTRAL WY AS THE BEST MOISTURE
PLUME HAS SHIFTED EWD DURING THE AFTN. THOUGH 2341Z IR SHOWS WARMING
ASSCD WITH TOPS OVER SWEETWATER..NEW CELLS FIRING ON THE BACKBUILDING
END ARE STILL AT -61C. 3 HR AUTOMATED STLT ESTIMATES SHOW AMOUNTS OF
UP TO 1.2" OVER THE SWEETWATER/UINTA BORDER BUT THAT SHOULD LIKELY BE
SHIFTED A BIT WSW TO THE POINT WHERE CELLS ARE INITIALLY FORMING AND
MAY BE UP TO .3-.5" UNDERDONE DUE TO THIS. SEE WEB ADDRESS IN ABOUT 5
MIN FOR ESTIMATE GRAPHIC.
.
SEE NCEP HPC DISCUSSION AND QPF/S FOR FORECAST.
....NESDIS IS A MEMBER OF 12 PLANET....
.
SSD/SAB WEB ADDRESS FOR PRECIP ESTIMATES:
HTTP://WWW.SSD.NOAA.GOV/PS/PCPN/
...ALL LOWER CASE EXCEPT /PS/PCPN/
.
LAT...LON 4195 11012 4144 10926 4046 11016 4076 11099
.
NNNN