68 FR 70228, December 17, 2003

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]

Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Wooden Bedroom 
Furniture from the People's Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Villanueva or Robert Bolling, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3208 and (202) 482-3434, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

INITIATION OF INVESTIGATION

The Petition

    On October 31, 2003, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
received a Petition on imports of wooden bedroom furniture from the 
People's Republic of China (``China'') (``Petition'') filed in proper 
form by the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade 
(``Committee'') and its individual members and the Cabinet Makers, 
Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 (collectively, ``the 
Petitioners'') on behalf of the domestic industry and workers producing 
wooden bedroom furniture. On November 6, 2003 and November 10, 2003, 
the Department requested clarification of certain areas of the Petition 
and received responses to both requests on November 12, 2003. On 
November 12, 2003, Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) 
Manufacturing Co., (``Markor'') and Lacquer Craft Manufacturing 
Company, Ltd., (``Lacquer'') submitted comments regarding the industry 
support for the Petition. On November 13, 2003, the Department received 
comments from Furniture Brands International, Inc. (``FBI''). On 
November 20, 2003, the Petitioners amended the Petition to include an 
additional margin estimate for a product within the scope of the 
investigation. On November 24, 2003, the Department published a notice 
in the Federal Register extending the twenty-day initiation 
determination deadline and requesting information from domestic 
producers of wooden bedroom furniture See Notice of Request for 
Information and Extension of Time: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China (``Extension Notice'') 68 FR 65875 (November 
24, 2003). On November 24, 2003, the Department requested from the 
Petitioners that certain business proprietary information be made 
public. On November 28, 2003, the Department received the public 
version of the business proprietary information requested on November 
24, 2003. On December 2, 2003, the Department received additional 
comments regarding industry support from Markor and Lacquer. 
Additionally, on December 2, 2003, the Department received comments 
from the Petitioners regarding opposition to the Petition. On December 
3, 2003, the Department received rebuttal comments to Markor's and 
Lacquer's December 2, 2003 comments from the Petitioners. On December 
3, 2003, the Department received comments from the Petitioners 
regarding the calculation of industry support. On December 4, 2003, the 
Petitioners amended the Petition adding four certified labor unions as 
Petitioners. Additionally, on December 4, 2003, FBI submitted comments 
regarding the calculation of industry support. On December 5, 2003, the 
Department received comments from Markor and Lacquer. On December 8, 
2003, the Department received comments from FBI and Markor and Lacquer. 
On December 9, 2003 the Department received comments from the 
Petitioners. Additionally, on December 9, 2003, the Department received 
a request from the Petitioners that the Department reject numerous 
submissions submitted earlier in this proceeding in accordance with 
Section 732(b)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''). On December 9, 2003, the Department returned FBI's comments of 
December 8, 2003. See Memorandum to the File from Lisa Shishido, Case 
Analyst, Regarding Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic 
of China, dated December 9, 2003. We note that in FBI's November 13, 
2003 comments and Markor and Lacquer's December 8, 2003 comments, both 
parties included comments on issues other than industry support, we did 
not reject those submission because they contained information 
regarding industry support. See Memo to the File from Alex Villanueva, 
Senior Case Analyst, Regarding Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China: FBI's November 13, 2003 Comments and Markor 
and Lacquer's December 8, 2003 Comments, dated December 9, 2003. 
However, we did not consider FBI's December 8, 2003 comments and Markor 
and Lacquer's December 8, 2003 comments that were not on industry 
support. See Import Administration: Antidumping Duty Investigation 
Initiation Checklist of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 
China(``Initiation Checklist''), dated December 10, 2003 at Attachment 
III. December 10, 2003, FBI revised their comments from December 8, 
2003.
    In accordance with section 732(b) of the Ac, the Petitioners allege 
that imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China are being, or are 
likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value within 
the meaning of section 731 of the Act, and that such imports are 
materially injuring and threaten to injury and industry in the United 
States.

Scope of Investigation

    For purposes of this investigation, the product covered is wooden 
bedroom furniture (i.e., subject merchandise). Wooden bedroom furniture 
is generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered 
for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the 
individual pieces are of approximately the same style and approximately 
the same material and/or finish. The subject merchandise are made 
substantially of wood products, including both solid wood and also 
engineered wood products made from wood particles, fibers, or other 
wooden materials such as plywood, oriented strand board, particle 
board, and fiberboard; with or without wood veneers, wood overlays, or 
laminates; with or without non-wood components or trim such as metal, 
marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other resins; and whether or not 
assembled, completed, or finished.
    The subject merchandise includes (1) wooden beds such as loft beds, 
bunk beds, and other beds; (2) wooden headboards for beds (whether 
stand-alone or attached to side rails), wooden footboards for beds, 
wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds; (3) night 
tables, night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests, 
gentlemen's chests, bachelor's chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, 
vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (4) 
dressers with framed glass mirrors that are attached to, incorporated 
in, sit on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chests-on-chests\1\, 
highboys\2\,

[[Page 70229]]

lowboys\3\, chests of drawers\4\, chests\5\, door chests\6\, 
chiffoniers\7\, hutches\8\, and armoires\9\; (6) desks, computer 
stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or writing tables that are 
attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and (7) other 
bedroom furniture consistent with the above list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-of-drawers in two 
or more sections (or appearing to be in two or more sections), with 
one or two sections mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a 
slightly larger chest; also known as a tallboy.
    \2\ A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers usually 
composed of a base and a top section with drawers, and supported on 
four legs or a small chest (often 15 inches or more in height).
    \3\ A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, not more 
than four feet high, normally set on short legs.
    \4\ A chest of drawers is typically a case containing drawers 
for storing clothing
    \5\ A chest is typically a case piece taller than it is wide 
featuring a series of drawers and with or without one or more doors 
for storing clothing. The piece can either include drawers or be 
designed as a large box incorporating a lid.
    \6\ A door chest is typically a chest with hinged doors to store 
clothing, whether or not containing drawers. The piece may also 
include shelves for televisions and other entertainment electronics.
    \7\ A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest of drawers 
normally used for storing undergarments and lingerie, often with 
mirror(s) attached.
    \8\ A hutch is typically an open case of furniture with shelves 
that typically sits on another piece of furniture and provides 
storage for clothes.
    \9\ An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe 
(typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more 
drawers (either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind 
the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 
storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold 
television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment 
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The scope of the Petition excludes (1) seats, chairs, benches, 
couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools, and other seating furniture; (2) 
mattresses, mattress supports (including box springs), infant cribs, 
water beds, and futon frames; (3) office furniture, such as desks, 
stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and 
bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen furniture such as dining tables, 
chairs, servers, sideboards, buffets, corner cabinets, china cabinets, 
and china hutches; (5) other non-bedroom furniture, such as television 
cabinets, cocktails tables, end tables, occasional tables, wall 
systems, book cases, and entertainment systems; (6) bedroom furniture 
made primarily of wicker, cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side rails 
for beds made of metal if sold separately from the headboard and 
footboard; and (8) bedroom furniture in which bentwood parts 
predominate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ As used herein, bentwood means solid wood made pliable. 
Bentwood is wood that is brought to a curved shape by bending it 
while made pliable with moist heat or other agency, and then set by 
cooling or drying. See Customs' Headquarters' Ruling Letter 043859, 
dated May 17, 1976.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of subject merchandise are classified under statistical 
category 9403.50.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (``HTSUS'') as ``wooden * * * beds'' and under statistical 
category 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as ``other * * * wooden furniture of 
a kind used in the bedroom.'' In addition, wooden headboards for beds, 
wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 
canopies for beds may also be entered under statistical category 
9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ``parts of wood'' and framed glass mirrors 
may also be entered under statistical category 7009.92.5000 of the 
HTSUS as ``glass mirrors...framed.'' This investigation covers all 
wooden bedroom furniture meeting the above description, regardless of 
tariff classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope 
of this proceeding is dispositive.
    During our review of the Petition, we discussed the scope with the 
Petitioners to ensure that it accurately reflects the product for which 
the domestic industry is seeking relief. Moreover, as discussed in the 
preamble to the Department's regulations, we are setting aside a period 
for interested parties to raise issues regarding product coverage. See 
Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27295, 
27323 (1997). The Department encourages all interested parties to 
submit such comments within 20 calendar days of publication of this 
notice.
    Comments should be addressed to Import Administration's Central 
Records Unit at Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. The period of scope 
consultations is intended to provide the Department with ample 
opportunity to consider all comments and consult with interested 
parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determination.

Determination of Industry Support for the Petition

    Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a Petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that the Department's industry support determination, which is 
to be made before the initiation of the investigation, be based on 
whether a minimum percentage of the relevant industry supports the 
Petition. A Petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers 
or workers who support the Petition account for: (i) at least 25 
percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (ii) 
more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product 
produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or 
opposition to, the Petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act 
provides that, if the Petition does not establish support of domestic 
producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total 
production of the domestic like product, the Department shall: (i) poll 
the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if 
there is support for the Petition, as required by subparagraph (A), or 
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling 
method.
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine whether a 
Petition has the requisite industry support, the statute directs the 
Department to look to producers and workers who produce the domestic 
like product. The International Trade Commission (``ITC''), which is 
responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has been 
injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like product 
in order to define the industry. While both the Department and the ITC 
must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like 
product (section 771(10) of the Act), they do so for different purposes 
and pursuant to a separate and distinct authority. In addition, the 
Department's determination is subject to limitations of time and 
information. Although this may result in different definitions of the 
like product, such differences do not render the decision of either 
agency contrary to law. See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 
2d 1, 8 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001), citing Algoma Steel Corp. Ltd. v. 
United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 642-44 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988).
    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation,'' i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
Petition.
    With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioner does not offer 
a definition of domestic like product distinct from the scope of the 
investigation. Based on our analysis of the information submitted in 
the Petition we have determined there is a single domestic like 
product, wooden bedroom furniture, which is defined further in the 
``Scope of the Investigations'' section above, and we have analyzed 
industry support in terms of that domestic like product.
    Based on information provided in the Petition, the share of total 
estimated U.S. production of the domestic like product in calendar year 
2002

[[Page 70230]]

represented by the Petitioners and the supporting domestic producers 
equal over 25 percent of total domestic production but less than 50 
percent of production of the domestic like product produced by that 
portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the 
Petition. See Extension Notice. Therefore, in accordance with 
732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, we polled the industry.
    On November 13, 2003, November 17, 2003 and November 19, 2003, we 
issued polling questionnaires to all known producers of wooden bedroom 
furniture identified in the Petition, listed on the Thomas Register and 
found on the internet by the Department. The combined list contained 
264 companies. See Memorandum to the File from Michael Holton, Case 
Analyst, Regarding the Addresses for All Parties the Department of 
Commerce Sent the Polling Questionnaire to on November 13, 2003 
(``Addresses Memo''), dated November 14, 2003. The addresses attached 
to the Addresses Memo were also used when sending the revised 
questionnaires dated November 17, 2003 and November 19, 2003. See 
Memorandum to the File from Alex Villanueva, Case Analyst, Regarding 
the Addresses for All Parties the Department of Commerce Sent the 
Polling Questionnaire on November 17, 2003 and November 19, 2003, dated 
December 3, 2003. The questionnaires are on file in the Central Records 
Unit (``CRU'') in room B-099 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. Additionally, the final questionnaire dated November 19, 2003 
was available on the Import Administration website. As noted earlier, 
the Department also published a notice in the Federal Register 
extending the twenty-day initiation determination deadline and 
requesting information from domestic producers of wooden bedroom 
furniture. See Extension Notice at 65877, 65878. We requested that each 
company complete the polling questionnaire and certify their responses 
and requested that all companies respond no later than November 26, 
2003 by faxing their responses to the Department at (202) 482-9089.
    By the deadline of November 26, 2003, the Department received a 
total of 104 responses. See Memorandum to the File from Alex 
Villanueva, Case Analysts through Robert A. Bolling, Program Manager 
and Edward C. Yang, Office Director, Regarding the Calculation of 
Industry Support (``Memo on Industry Support''), dated December 10, 
2003 at Attachment II of the Initiation Checklist. Any responses 
received after this date were not included in our analysis. See 
Extension Notice at 65876 and Initiation Checklist at Attachment II. 
The Department will be returning all polling questionnaire responses 
not received by November 26, 2003. Pursuant to section 351.104 of the 
Department's regulations, the Department has relied upon the responses 
to this questionnaire and follow-up phone calls to clarify certain 
responses to determine industry support. For a log of the phone calls 
made by the Department, please see the Memorandum to the File from Lisa 
Shishido, Case Analyst, Regarding the Telephone Call Log Clarifying 
Information Received by the Department, dated December 10, 2003. For a 
detailed discussion of the responses received please see the Initiation 
Checklist at Attachment II. For a discussion on the comments received 
from interested parties, please see the Initiation Checklist at 
Attachment III. For a detailed discussion of the comments received by 
workers, please see the Initiation Checklist at Attachment II. Our 
analysis of the data indicates that the domestic producers of wooden 
bedroom furniture who support the Petition account for more than 57 
percent of the production (by U.S. dollar sales value) of the domestic 
like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing 
support for, or opposition to, the Petition. See Initiation Checklist 
at Attachment II.
    Accordingly, the Department determines that the industry support 
requirements of section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act have been met.

Export Price and Normal Value

    The following is a description of the allegation of sales at less 
than fair value (``LTFV'') upon which the Department based its decision 
to initiate this investigation. The sources of data for the deductions 
and adjustments relating to the U.S. price and the factors of 
production are also discussed in the Initiation Checklist. Should the 
need arise to use any of this information as facts available under 
section 776 of the Act in our preliminary or final determination, we 
may reexamine the information and revise the margin calculations, if 
appropriate.

Export Price

    The Petitioners identified approximately one-hundred thirty five 
Chinese companies as major producers and exporters of wooden bedroom 
furniture in China. See Petition at Exhibit 6.
    The Petitioners calculated an export price (``EP''). To calculate 
export prices for wooden bedroom furniture from China, Petitioners used 
invoices for wooden bedroom furniture produced by Chinese producers 
that were purchased during the period of investigation (``POI''). Given 
the sales terms on the invoice, the Petitioners have used free on board 
(``FOB'') prices as the basis for the U.S. price and, conservatively, 
have not deducted foreign inland freight from the factory to the port, 
brokerage and handling fees, or port charges at the port of 
exportation. However, to obtain ex-factory prices, the Petitioners 
deducted a percentage of the selling price (price listed on the 
invoice) to account for an agent markup for sales made from the agent 
to the U.S. customer in the United States. See Initiation Checklist for 
further information.

Normal Value

    China is a non-market economy country and no determination to the 
contrary has yet been made by the Department. See Initiation Checklist 
at 4-5. Accordingly, the Petitioners provided a dumping margin 
calculation using the Department's NME methodology as required by 19 
C.F.R. Sec. 351.202(b)(7)(i)(C) of the Department's regulations.
    For the normal value (``NV'') calculation, the Petitioners based 
the factors of production, as defined by section 773(c)(3) of the Act 
(raw materials, labor and energy), for wooden bedroom furniture using 
the factors of production used to make the wooden bedroom furniture on 
the invoices used in their calculation of export price above. In order 
to accurately calculate the usage of materials used in the production 
of the imported furniture, the Petitioners disassembled each piece of 
furniture and identified, weighed, and measured each component part. 
The items selected by the Petitioners for deconstruction and ultimately 
used for the normal value calculation, provide a broad selection of 
items within the wooden bedroom furniture like product category. 
According to the Petitioners, the dumping margins in the Petition 
represent ``each of the products in a standard bedroom suite because 
subject imports are typically sold in suites, collections, or groups'' 
and are ``representative of the prices for imports'' of wooden bedroom 
furniture from China during the POI. See Petitioners' November 12, 2003 
Submission at 8. However, the amount of labor hours and energy needed 
to produce the wooden bedroom furniture items analyzed were based on 
the experience of the Petitioners. See Initiation Checklist.

[[Page 70231]]

    The Petitioners selected India as their surrogate country. The 
Petitioners argued that pursuant to section 773(c)(4) of the Act, India 
is an appropriate surrogate because it is a market-economy country that 
is at a comparable level of economic development to the NME and is a 
significant producer of comparable merchandise. Based on the 
information provided by the Petitioners, we believe that the 
Petitioners' use of India as a surrogate country is appropriate for 
purposes of initiating this investigation. See Initiation Checklist.
    In accordance with section 773(c)(4) of the Act, the Petitioners 
valued factors of production, where possible, on reasonably available, 
public surrogate country data. To value certain raw materials, the 
Petitioners used official Indian government import statistics, 
excluding those values from countries previously determined by the 
Department to be NME countries and imports into India from Indonesia, 
Korea and Thailand, in light of the prevalence of export subsidies in 
those countries. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Ferrovanadium from the People's Republic of China 67 
FR 71137, 71139 (November 20, 2002). For inputs valued in Indian Rupees 
and not contemporaneous with the POI (i.e., April 2003-September 2003), 
the Petitioners used information from the wholesale price indices 
(``WPI'') in India as published in the International Financial 
Statistics of the International Monetary Fund to determine the 
appropriate adjustments for inflation. In addition, the Petitioners 
made currency conversions, where necessary, based on the average rupee/
U.S. dollar exchange rate for the POI. See Petition at Exhibit 11.
    To value the raw materials, (lumber (e.g., ash, birch, maple, oak, 
pine, poplar tupelo), other wood items (e.g., cherry wood veneer, 
fiberboard, hardboard, okoume plywood, lauan plywood, particle board, 
poplar veneer, oak veneer, wood pulls and okoume veneer), fasteners 
(e.g., brad & nails, staples, dowels, screws, washers, brass hinges, 
nuts, brass bolts and hex key), paints and stains (non-water based 
stains, sealers and lacquers), other miscellaneous items (e.g., printed 
labels, printed tags, printed paper, glues, plastic furniture fittings, 
metal drawer pulls & parts, drawer guide brackets, felt and mirrors), 
packing materials (e.g., polyethylene foam, styrofoam, corrugated 
cardboard, tape, poly bags, poly straps, plywood, and shrink wrap)), 
the Petitioners calculated surrogate values from the Indian import 
statistics. See Petition at Exhibits 12 & 13.
    To value electricity, the Petitioners calculated surrogate values 
using prices paid by industrial electrical users in India from Key 
World Energy Statistics published by the International Energy Agency in 
2003. However, the price listed in Key World Energy Statistics is for 
electricity prices from 2000. Therefore, this price was adjusted for 
inflation using the WPI from the International Financial Statistics. 
See Petition at Exhibits 12 and 15.
    Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 351.408(c)(3) of the Department's 
regulations, the Department calculates and publishes the surrogate 
values for labor to be used in non-market economy cases. Therefore, the 
Petitioners used the labor rate of $0.83 per hour listed on the 
Department's website. See Petition at Exhibit 14.
    The Petitioners calculated surrogate financial ratios (factory 
overhead, selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and 
profit) using the publicly available financial statements from India 
Furniture Products, Ltd., an Indian producer of wooden bedroom 
furniture for the period (March 1, 2002-March 31, 2003), the most 
recently available financial period.
    Based on comparisons of EP to NV, calculated in accordance with 
section 773(c) of the Act, the estimated recalculated dumping margin 
for wooden bedroom furniture ranges from 158.74 percent to 440.96 
percent.

Fair Value Comparisons

    Based on the data provided by the Petitioners, there is reason to 
believe that imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China are being, 
or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The Petition alleges that the U.S. industry producing the domestic 
like product is being materially injured and is threatened with 
material injury, by reason of the imports of the subject merchandise 
sold at less than NV. The Petitioners contend that the industry's 
injured condition is evident in: (1) increasing imports' market share 
and apparent domestic consumption; (2) declining employment; (3) 
declining production and capacity utilization; (4) plant closures; and 
(5) lost sales and revenues. See Initiation Checklist at Attachment V 
(Injury).
    The Department assessed the allegations and supporting evidence 
regarding material injury and causation and determined that these 
allegations are supported by accurate and adequate evidence and meet 
the statutory requirements for initiation.

Initiation of Antidumping Investigation

    Based upon our examination of the Petition on wooden bedroom 
furniture from China, we find that the Petition meets the requirements 
of section 732 of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating an antidumping 
duty investigation to determine whether imports of wooden bedroom 
furniture from China are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United 
States at less than fair value. Unless postponed, we will make our 
preliminary determination no later than 140 days after the date of this 
initiation.

Distribution of Copies of the Petition

    In accordance with section 732(b)(3)(A) of the Act, a copy of the 
public version of the Petition has been provided to the government 
representatives of China.

International Trade Commission Notification

    We have notified the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 
732(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determination by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, no later than mid-January, 
whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of wooden bedroom 
furniture from China are causing material injury, or threatening to 
cause material injury, to a U.S. industry. A negative ITC determination 
will result in this investigation being terminated; otherwise, this 
investigation will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time 
limits.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: December 10, 2003.
James J. Jochum,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 03-31129 Filed 12-16-03; 8:45 am]