This is the background image for an unknown creator of an OCR page with image plus hidden text. US.Department 400 Seventh Street, S.W. 
of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 
Pipeline and 
Hazardous Materials Safety 
Administration 
Mr. Mark Worthey 
Vice President of Operations 
Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. 
51 00 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 3000 
Plano, TX 74024 
RE: CPF NO. 2-2005-5007 
Dear Mr. Worthey: 
Enclosed is the Final Order issued by the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety in 
the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of violation and assesses a civil penalty of $23,250. 
I acknowledge receipt of, and accept payment dated June 1,2005 in the amount of $23,250 as 
payment in full of the civil penalty assessed against Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. in the Final Order. 
This case is now closed. Your receipt of the Final Order constitutes service of that document 
under 49 C.F.R. $ 190.5. 
Sincerely, 
James Reynolds 
Pipeline Compliance Registry 
Office of Pipeline Safety 
Enclosure 
cc: Ms. Linda Daugherty, Director, OPS Southern Region 
CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED 

This is the background image for an unknown creator of an OCR page with image plus hidden text. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION 
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 
In the Matter of 1 
)
Denbury Onshore, L.L.C., ) CPF NO. 2-2005-5007 
1 
Respondent. 
FINAL ORDER 
From August 30,2004 to September 3,2004, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5 601 17, a representative of the 
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Southern Region conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection 
of Respondent's North East Jackson Dome (NEJD) pipeline facilities in Mississippi. As a result of 
the inspection, the Director, Southern Region, OPS, issued to Respondent, by letter dated May 1 1, 
2005, a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty (Notice). In accordance with 49 
C.F.R. 5 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that Respondent had committed violations of 49 
C.F.R. Part 195 and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $23,250 for the alleged violations. 
Respondent responded to the Notice by letter dated June 9,2005 (Response). Respondent did not 
contest the allegation of violation, but offered information to explain the allegations and provided 
information concerning the corrective actions it has taken. Respondent did not request a hearing, 
and therefore has waived the right to one. 
FINDINGS OF VIOLATION 
Uncontested 
Respondent did not contest the alleged violations in the Notice. Accordingly, I find that 
Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. Part 195, as more fully described in the Notice: 
49 C.F.R. 5 195.403 (a) 1 -5 and (b) 1-2 -failure to provide records to demonstrate 
that each employee's performance in meeting the objectives of the emergency 
response training was accomplished at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at 
least once each calendar year. 
49 C.F.R. $195.403(c) -failure to demonstrate that the supervisors' knowledge of 
emergency response procedures for which they are responsible has been 
maintained and verified. 

This is the background image for an unknown creator of an OCR page with image plus hidden text. 49 C.F.R. $ l95.42O(a) and (b) -failure to provide valve inspection records to 
demonstrate that all 2 1 designated mainline valves in Mississippi were in good 
working order at all times. Respondent's valve inspection records show 14 valve 
inspections were not completed in the first half of 2003 and 2 valve inspections 
were not completed in the second half of 2003. 
These findings of violation will be considered prior offenses in any subsequent enforcement 
action taken against Respondent. 
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY 
Under 49 U.S.C. $ 60122, Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $100,000 per 
violation for each day of the violation up to a maximum of $1,000,000 for any related series of 
violations. The Notice proposed a total civil penalty of $23,250 for violations of 49 C.F.R. Part 195. 
49 U.S.C. 9 60122 and 49 C.F.R. 5 190.225 require that, in determining the amount of the civil 
penalty, I consider the following criteria: nature, circumstances, and gravity of the violation, degree 
of Respondent's culpability, history of Respondent's prior offenses, Respondent's ability to pay the 
penalty, good faith by Respondent in attempting to achieve compliance, the effect on Respondent's 
ability to continue in business, and such other matters as justice may require. 
Item 1 of the Notice proposed a civil penalty of $5,000, as Respondent failed to provide records to 
demonstrate that each employee's performance in meeting the objectives of the emergency response 
training was accomplished, at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar 
year, as required by 49 C.F.R. $195.403 (a)l-5 and (b) 1-2. Respondent did not contest the 
allegation of violation. Accordingly, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment 
criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of $5,000, already paid by the Respondent for violation. 
Item 2 of the Notice proposed a civil penalty of $5,000, as Respondent failed to provide records to 
demonstrate that the supervisors' knowledge of emergency response procedures for which they are 
responsible has been maintained and verified, as required by 49 C.F.R. $ l95.403(c). Respondent 
did not contest the allegation of violation. Accordingly, having reviewed the record and considered 
the assessment criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of $5,000, already paid by the Respondent 
for violation. 
Item 3 of the Notice proposed a civil penalty of $13,250, as Respondent failed to provide valve 
inspection records to demonstrate that a11 2 1 designated mainline valves in Mississippi were in good 
working order at all times, as required by 49 C.F.R. $195.420(a) and (b). Respondent's valve 
inspection records show 14 valve inspections were not completed in the first half of 2003 and 2 valve 
inspections were not completed in the second half of 2003. Respondent did not contest the 
allegation of violation. Accordingly, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment 
criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of $13,250, already paid by the Respondent for violation. 

This is the background image for an unknown creator of an OCR page with image plus hidden text. WARNING ITEMS 
The Notice did not propose a civil penalty or compliance action for Items 4,5, and 6 in the Notice; 
therefore, these are considered warning items. Respondent is warned that if it does not take 
appropriate action to correct these items, enforcement action will be taken if a subsequent inspection 
reveals a violation. 
The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective on receipt. 
Date Issued 
for Pipeline Safety