BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
LIABILITY FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY FURNISHED FOR REPAIR OR OTHER SERVICES (1852.245‑72) (MAR 1989)

    	(a) This clause shall govern with respect to any Government property furnished to the Contractor for repair or other services that is to be returned to the Government.  Such property, hereinafter referred to as "Government property furnished for servicing," shall not be subject to any clause of this contract entitled Government‑Furnished Property or Government Property.

    	(b) The official accountable recordkeeping, and financial control and reporting of the property subject to this clause shall be retained by the Government.  The Contractor shall maintain adequate records and procedures to assure that the Government property furnished for servicing can be readily accounted for and identified at all times while in its custody or possession or in the custody or possession of any subcontractor.

    	(c) The Contractor shall be liable for any loss or destruction of or damage to the Government property furnished for servicing (1)  caused by the Contractor's failure to exercise such care and diligence as a reasonable prudent owner of similar property would exercise under similar circumstances, or (2) sustained while the property is being worked upon and directly resulting from that work, including, but not limited to, any repairing, adjusting, inspecting, servicing, or maintenance operation.  The Contractor shall not be liable for loss or destruction of or damage to Government property furnished for servicing resulting from any other cause except to the extent that the loss, destruction, or damage is covered by insurance (including self‑insurance funds or reserves).

    	(d) In addition to any insurance (including self‑insurance funds or reserves) carried by the Contractor and in effect on the date of this contract affording protection in whole or in part against loss or destruction of or damage to such Government property furnished for servicing, the amount and coverage of which the Contractor agrees to maintain, the Contractor further agrees to obtain any additional insurance covering such loss, destruction, or damage that the Contracting Officer may from time to time require.  The requirements for this additional insurance shall be effected under the procedures established by the FAR 52.243 changes clause of this contract.

    	(e) The Contractor shall hold the Government harmless and shall indemnify the Government against all claims for injury to persons or damage to property of the Contractor or others arising from the Contractor's possession or use of the Government property furnished for servicing or arising from the presence of that property on the contractor's premises or property.

    (End of clause)
+---------------------------------------------+
| **\"Bob Lossius\" \<bob_l@co.lake.ca.us\>** |
|                                             |
| 12/10/2007 11:23 AM                         |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+
|                                             |
+---------------------------------------------+

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

THE MOST ANNOYING, BOTHERSOME, EXPENSIVE IMPACT TO A OUR SMALL RURAL
COUNTY IS THE LOCAL DISTRICTS(SACRAMENTO) INTERPRETATION OF WETLANDS AND
WATERS OF THE US. IN THEIR INTERPRETATION OF THE RAPANOS GUIDELINES,
EVERYTHING HAS A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS. WE HAVE A MANMADE DITCH THAT DRAINS
STORMWATER FROM OUR AIRPORT THAT ONLY HAS WATER IN IT DURING RAIN EVENTS
AND ONLY FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. THE CORPS DETERMINED THAT THIS
DITCH DRAINED WETLANDS(AN AREA OUR TRAINED CONSULTANT DETERMINED WERE
NOT WETLANDS) INTO ANOTHER MANMADE DITCH THAT WENT INTO A CREEK(THAT
ONLY FLOWS ABOUT 6 MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR) AND THEN INTO A LAKE. THE
MANMADE DRAINAGE DITCH AT THE AIR FIELD IS NOW WATERS OF THE US?

THANKS

BOB LOSSIUS

Robert (Bob) Lossius

Assistant Director

Department of Public Works

County of Lake

255 North Forbes Street

Lakeport, CA 95453

Phone: (707) 263-2341

Fax: (707) 263-7748

Email:
Conference, Administrative & Travel Services (CATS)

Statement of Work -- Shlomo A. Trachtenberg, Ph.D.

Scientist will be studying at the molecular level the structural basis
of cell motility in the model organism Spiroplasma. In earlier
collaboration with our lab and that of Richard Leapman (DBEPS/ORS), he
has found that the cytoskeleton of Spiroplasma is in the form of a flat
ribbon comprised of seven fibers attached to the cell membrane; it is
responsible for maintaining the helical shape of the cell as well as for
its motility. This organization of the ribbon has now been confirmed by
sophisticated EM tomography analysis of whole cells, as well as of
isolated membrane fractions. Interestingly, it conflicts with results
recently published by others in *Science*. Now, Dr. Trachtenberg will
finish refining the existing tomographic data sets and write up the
results, which, clearly need to be published ASAP.

We wish to provide airfare and per diem for Dr. Trachtenberg's services.

Funding for per diem: \$ 4,020.00

Airfare: 1,465.00

TOTAL \$ 5,485.00

Request (one) check for per diem.and airfare in the amount of
\$5,485.00.

Check will be mailed to Project Officer:

Linda A. Franklin

Building 10, Room 5N220

10 Center Drive MSC 1426

Bethesda, MD 20892-1426.
**An upgrade for AnSWR is available!!**

**WIN 95 and WIN 98 USERS!!! **

**THIS VERSION OF AnSWR WILL NOT WORK ON WIN 95 or WIN 98 !!!!**

**THE LASTEST VERSION FOR WIN 95 IS 6.2.159 !!!**

**THE LASTEST VERSION FOR WIN 95 IS 6.4.177 !!!**

**This release patch installs ver 6.4.189 released 9/23/2005**

**NOTICE: IF YOU ARE NOT PRESENTLY RUNNING VER 6.2.159 YOU MUST USE FULL
PATCH NO MATTER WHAT THIS UPGRADE WIZARD SAYS FOR MINI PATCH
UPDATE!!!!!**

**COMPONENT UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS AS OF 1/3/2003 **

**for ver 6.4.164 and latter!!!!!**

-   **ALL MUST DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL MICROSOFT UNIVERSAL DATA COMPONENTS
    2.7!!!! (if not previously installed)**

-   **ALL USERS MUST DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL JET SERVICE PACK 5 or latter
    (if not previously installed)**

The components may be downloaded from the AnSWR website
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm

**To install the JET SP5\.....**

**[WINDOWS ]{.underline}[98 and WINDOWS NT users]{.underline}**

download and run MDAC_TYP27.EXE

download and run jet40sp5_9xnt.exe

**[WINDOWS 2000 SYSTEMS]{.underline}**

download and run MDAC_TYP27.EXE

download and run jet40sp5_w2k.exe

**[Windows ME SYSTEMS]{.underline}**

download and run MDAC_TYP27.EXE

download and run jet40sp5_me.exe

The FULL patch will install the upgrade patch for ver 6.4.189 of AnSWR.
It requires ver 4.2.10 or latter be previously installed. If you are
running an earlier version you must install the upgrade patch for ver
4.2.10 or the FULL installation for ver 6.4.x. Both may be downloaded
from the AnSWR website.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm

**This patch adds:**

-   Fixes save problem in Sensitive Phrase Substitution

-   Fixes problem in code/source change process

The full patch is 6,818,027 bytes

If you have previously upgraded to **ver 6.1.159** then there is an
alternate patch file which is smaller. The alternate Mini Patch file is:
3,975,178 bytes

**There is also a new MANUAL as of 4/2004. Visit the AnSWR website to
download the latest Manual.**

**http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm**
***G-banding using Wright**'**s stain. ***

*Equipment and reagents*

· Coplin jars

· Staining slide rack

· Slide warmer

· Wright's stain (Sigma). To make a stain stock solution (2.5 mg/ ml
methanol) swirl 100 ml absolute methanol in a flask. Add 250 mg of
powdered stain to swirling methanol. Continue to swirl 30 min at
moderate rate. Filter through Whatman #1 filter paper and aliquot into
aluminum foil covered 10 ml bottles. Store away from heat and light.

· 2XSSC

· Sorensen's buffer pH 7.2. Prepare the buffer by mixing 49 ml of 0.06 M
Na~2~HPO~4~ (8.52 g/liter) with 51 ml of KH~2~PO~4~ 0.06 M (8.16
g/liter)

· Mounting medium (Molecular Probes)

*Method*

1\. Bake the chromosome preparations in an oven or slide warmer at 60 C
overnight.

2\. Place the slides in a coplin jar and fill it with 2XSSC. Incubate
the slides at 60 C in a water bath for 2-3 h. Discard the saline
solution and rinse thoroughly at least 10 times with tap water.

3\. Let the slides air dry at room temperature for 12-16 h.

4\. Place the slide on a staining rack and cover the preparation with
Sorensen's buffer for 45-50 sec^a^.

5\. Discard the phosphate solution and cover the slide with Wright's
stain solution for 60-90 sec (0.5 ml Wright's stain in 1.5 ml
buffer)^b^.

6\. Rinse slides gently with tap water^c^, let air dry and mount if
desired.

7\. Observe under transmitted light microscope at 1000X magnification.

^a^Staining time may need to be optimized. Always stain one slide first
and check banding quality before staining additional slides.

^b^Adjust staining time if necessary, but it should be always less than
2 min. Otherwise it is recommended to prepare a new stain stock
solution. Wright's stain will form a precipitate when added to buffer.
Therefore, the two should not be mixed until just prior to flooding the
slide.

^c^Be careful not to over-rinse slides since excessive rinsing will fade
stain.
Tun Min Nyo

The proposed rule will allow the flight crew to monitor and identify
persons requesting access to the flight deck and it will also allow the
flight crew to be notified of suspicious activity in the cabin by the
flight attendants using some form of remote notification device. This
notification will allow the pilots enough time to prepare for emergency
landing procedures.

The rule would require all airplanes, operating under FAR part 121 to
retrofit their aircraft with surveillance systems to monitor the area on
the cabin side of flight deck area and have equipment which would allow
the flight crew to notify the pilots of suspicious activity. This
requirement would cost the industry money, as is with every passage of
rule. Thus it is important to assess the benefits of implementation of
the rule against its cost. If the benefits can be justified by its cost,
the rule should be implemented. According to FAA's analyses on the NPRM,
the rule would "have benefits that justify its cost". The NPRM will also
allow time for the airlines to retrofit their aircrafts (2 years), which
would give them time to weight their options and determine the best
course of implementation at present times.

It is in my opinion that the rule should be passed as it "effectively"
adds a new and more efficient security layer to air transport system of
the U.S. I encourage the passing of this rule because it seems more
economically efficient when compared to other proposals, such as the Arm
Pilot Program and The Air Marshals. The NPRM is also concurrent with the
ICAO recommendations and standards. The only issue with the NPRM is the
question of how fool proof is the system? It is in my judgment that
there is no completely fool proof system. But it is a system that can be
implemented cheaply, efficiently, and economically without the
compromise of people's privacy. And with a system like this in place,
the probability of reaching a catastrophic consequence, such as the of
Sept. 11, can be considerably lowered if the air transport security
layers are increased.

Disclaimer: The above statement is of my own opinion and does not
represent the opinion of The University of Nebraska or The Aviation
Institute.
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0414

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM095AD

747-27-2280, R6 \-\-- 2/14/08

747-27-2280, R5 \-\-- 4/5/07

747-27-2371 \-\-- 12/20/00

747-27-2280, R4 \-\-- 4/26/01

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0410

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM362AD

747-35-2114, R1 \-\-- 6/7/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Don Bearden

Director of Governmental Affairs

Direct Dial: (856) 488-8644

Fax: (856) 488-3255

E-Mail:

[`	``	``	``	``	``	``	``February 12, 2001`]{.underline}

[`	``	``	``	``	``	``	``Ref. No. GA01-012C`]{.underline}

[`Docket Management`]{.underline}

[`Room PL-401`]{.underline}

**[`National Highway Traffic Safety Administration`]{.underline}**

[`400 Seventh Street, S.W.`]{.underline}

[`Washington, D.C. 20590`]{.underline}

[`Re:``	`]{.underline}**[`Docket No. NHTSA-00-8248; RIN 2127-AF36; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Fuel System Integrity, Notice of Proposed Rule-Making`]{.underline}**

[`Gentlemen:`]{.underline}

[`Subaru of America, Inc. (Subaru), the distributor for Subaru vehicles in the USA, on behalf of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. (FHI), the manufacturer of Subaru vehicles, submits the following comments in response to the subject Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on Fuel System Integrity, FMVSS 301.  Subaru reserves the right for further submission of comments specific to detailed rulemaking issues not incorporated within the NPRM.  Such issues would include protocols for testing, methodology and details omitted from the NPRM as practicable for compliance with the Final Rule.`]{.underline}

**[`COMMENTS`]{.underline}**

[`Subaru supports NHTSA``’``s intent to upgrade safety by enacting new and more stringent rear impact test procedures including higher speed and changes to the barrier.  However, we are concerned about the very short lead-time for the new rear impact test requirements.  `]{.underline}

[`NHTSA stated in the preamble that the design changes necessary to meet the new requirements were moderate and not requiring retooling.  Subaru believes that major design changes, including retooling, are necessary for rear floor and frame structures of all of our car lines.  In addition, the fuel system routing also will require redesign to meet the requirements of the proposed new regulation.  `]{.underline}

[`NHTSA indicated that ``“``a lead time of about 27 months is reasonably necessary" however, because this rulemaking will require a large-scale body redesign for all our car lines, Subaru strongly requests that phase-in for this rulemaking begin at the earliest from September 1, 2005 with a 3-year full phase-in (100% compliance after September 1, 2007).`]{.underline}

[`We appreciate the opportunity to offer our comments.`]{.underline}

[`Sincerely,`]{.underline}

[`SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.`]{.underline}

[`Don Bearden, Director`]{.underline}

[`Governmental Affairs`]{.underline}

[`DB:ds`]{.underline}
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2006-25658

Directorate Identifier: 2006NM054AD

A320-57-1133, R03 \-\-- 7/3/07

A320-27-1108, R04 \-\-- 11/22/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
## New planet found in Milky Way

Friday, May 27, 2005 Posted: 11:49 AM EDT (1549 GMT)

  -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     **This picture was taken by the Hubble Telescope, which will now be used to further investigate the discovery.**
     
     
     
  -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**(CNN) \-- Australian researchers have helped discover a new planet in
the Milky Way, and they believe it\'s just a matter of time before more
are discovered.**

The gaseous planet is about 1000 times the size of Earth and is about
halfway to the center of the galaxy, or about 25,000 light years away,
researchers said Tuesday.

The project used a little-known technique called micro-lensing \-- using
the gravitational pull of a star to act as a giant lens \-- to help
astronomers to look for new planets.

University of Tasmania Professor John Dickey, who took part in the
project, told Australia\'s ABC radio that the technique could help
astronomers discover new planets unable to be picked up by more
traditional methods.

\"What\'s special about this event is, it was discovered in a way \...
which could, in principle, turn up Earth-like planets as well,\" Dickey
said.

\"Our other ways of finding planets around stars are only sensitive to
very massive ones like Jupiter.

\"We\'ve been struggling with this technique to try to open the door to
finding Earth-like planets, which I think is now much more hopeful.\"

The Hubble Telescope will now be used to try to find out more
information about the star and its planet, which astronomers believe is
the most distant ever detected.

The discovery is the result of a project coordinated by the Paris
Institute of Astrophysics involving four telescopes in the southern
hemisphere, including the University of Tasmania\'s Canopus Observatory.