BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**Center for Science and Engineering Education**

**Memorandum of Understanding**

**[Safety Responsibilities for CSEE Participants]{.underline}**

Safety is an overriding consideration for all work involving student
participants at the Berkeley Lab. In addition to assuring the safety of
student employees, the Berkeley Lab wants to instill in student
employees an understanding of the safety requirements and processes they
will encounter throughout their careers following graduation. Based on
these considerations, the undersigned agree to the following safety
arrangements:

1.  The Student will follow all applicable Berkeley Lab safety
    requirements. In case of doubt, the Student will consult with the
    Mentor before proceeding.

2.  The Mentor will identify all personal protective equipment the
    Student will require and will assure that such equipment is
    available to the Student, and that the student knows when and how to
    use it.

3.  The Mentor will not assign any task to the Student until the Mentor
    has verified that the student has the knowledge, skills and physical
    ability to perform the task safely. At a minimum, this will involve
    an initial safety orientation to the Student's work area and work
    assignments by the Mentor.

4.  Based on the work the Student will perform, the Mentor and the
    Student will complete a Job Hazard Questionnaire (JHQ) as soon as
    possible following completion of the New Employee Orientation (EHS
    010). The Mentor and the CSEE Supervisor will confer concerning the
    completion of training identified on the JHQ.

5.  Until required training identified through the JHQ process or
    otherwise is completed, the Student may perform corresponding tasks
    only under close supervision of the Mentor, i.e., with the full
    knowledge of the Mentor and while in the same room or area.

6.  The Mentor will provide appropriate safety supervision for the
    Student throughout the Student's stay at the Berkeley Lab.

7.  The Mentor may delegate safety supervision as needed to the
    following qualified Laboratory employees:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

  ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
  **Student / Date**                         **Mentor / Date**                          **CSEE Supervisor / Date**
  \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_   \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_   \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
  ..............................             ..............................             ..............................
  ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
**References**

1\. The House of Representatives Office of the Law Revision Counsel,
U.S. Code, *10 U.S.C. 2281(c)*, January 1, 1998.

2\. Presidential Decision Directive, *U.S. Global Positioning System
Policy,"* March 29, 1996.

3\. OMB Circular A-76, *"Performance of Commercial Activities,"* August
4, 1983; Supplemental handbook, April 11, 1996; Transmittal memo #16,
May 23, 1996.

4\. United States Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS),
[FAA Handbook 8260.3B]{.underline}, July 1976.

5\. FAA Advisory Circulars: No. 90-45A,* "Approval of Area Navigation
Systems for Use in the U.S. National Airspace System,"* February 21,
1975; No. 20-130, *"Airworthiness Approval of Multi-Sensor Navigation
Systems in the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) and Alaska,"*
September 12, 1988; No. 20-121A, *"Airworthiness Approval of the Loran-C
Navigation System for Use in U.S. National Airspace (NAS) and Alaska,"*
August 24, 1988; and TSO C129, *"Airborne Supplemental Navigation
Equipment Using the Global Positioning System,"* December 12, 1992.

6\. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
*ITS Architecture: Report of the Joint Architecture Team*, June 1996.

*7. A Technical Report to the Secretary of Transportation on a National
Approach to Augmented GPS Services.* NTIA Special Publication 94-30,
December l994.

*8. Report of the Joint DOD/DOT Task Force - The Global Positioning
System: Management and Operation of a Dual System.* A Report to the
Secretaries of Transportation and Defense, December 1993.

9\. Federal Railroad Administration, *"Differential GPS: An Aid To
Positive Train Control,"* Report to the Committees on Appropriations,
June 1995.

10\. U.S. Department of Defense, *Global Positioning System Standard
Positioning Service Signal Specification.* 2nd Edition, June 2, 1995.

11\. Public law 105.66, SEC. 346, October 27, 1997.

12\. U.S. Department of Transportation - Intelligent Transportation
Systems Joint Program Office, Federal Highway Administration, Federal
Transit Administration, and National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, *Department of Transportation's Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITS) Projects,* January 1998.

*13. Radio Spectrum Requirements for a Modernized Air Traffic Control
System*, prepared for The White House Commission on Aviation Safety and
Security, February 12, 1997.

14\. National Imagery and Mapping Agency, "*Department of Defense World
Geodetic System 1984, Its Definition and Relationships with Local
Geodetic Systems*," Third Edition, July 4, 1997.
[Building 510A]{.underline}

[P.O. Box 5000]{.underline}

[Upton, NY 11973-5000]{.underline}

[Phone 631 344-2051]{.underline}

[Fax 631 344-5568]{.underline}

[physics chair@bnl.gov]{.underline}

[managed by Brookhaven Science Associates]{.underline}\
[for the U.S. Department of Energy ]{.underline}

[date: October 4, 2001 ]{.underline}

[to: Physics Department Scientific Staff ]{.underline}

[from: Samuel H. Aronson ]{.underline}

[subject: Scientific Record for Performance Appraisal (formerly referred
to as Scientific Addendum)]{.underline}

[You need to complete a Scientific Record as part of your Performance
Appraisal. This form is now Part I of the Scientific Staff Performance
Appraisal Form. These forms are available electronically in the
Performance Appraisals SBMS Subject Area[
]{#_Hlt527186721}(<https://sbms.bnl.gov/standard/1s/1s00t011.htm>). A
copy of this Scientific Record, along with your updated R2A2, will be
retained with your scientific file in the Department
office.]{.underline}

[Please complete your Scientific Record (Part I) and give a copy to your
group leader and one to Pat Valli by ]{.underline}**[October 19,
2001]{.underline}**[. It is very important that you adhere to this
timescale if we are to meet the deadline for salary reviews. If we do
not have a completed Performance Appraisal by the time of the Salary
Review then you will not be eligible for a pay increase for next
year.]{.underline}

[The Scientific Record should be brief but should give a clear picture
of your view of your accomplishments over the past year.]{.underline}

[You will also need to complete the Scientific Staff Performance
Planning form found at the end of the Performance Appraisal by the
]{.underline}**[end of November]{.underline}**[. This planning form is
to be used to document what you expect to pursue in the current year.
When it is complete, the form will be filed with the completed appraisal
form.]{.underline}
+---------------------------+
| **Pedro_Ramirez@fws.gov** |
|                           |
| 03/03/2008 04:23 PM       |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+
|                           |
+---------------------------+

    I have reviewed the draft questionnaire for the coalbed methane extraction sector and offer the following comments:

    The draft questionnaire should include the collection of the size of the surface impoundment/sedimentation ponds (C3-4) and stock tanks (C3-5) in acres.  Although the draft questionnaire will collect information on size of ponds or stock tanks in barrels or acre-feet, data on the actual "footprint" of the stock tanks and ponds or impoundments in acres would provide useful data in assessing the amount of open water in acres that could attract migratory aquatic birds.  The acreage data could also be useful for other purposes such as assessing potential "footprints" of the ponds and the potential for groundwater contamination.

    If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact me at the address or phone number provided below.  Thank you.

    Pedro 'Pete' Ramirez, Jr.

    Environmental Contaminants Specialist

    USFWS

    5353 Yellowstone Road - Suite 308

    Cheyenne, WY 82009

    Pedro_Ramirez@fws.gov

    (307) 772-2374 ext 236

    ********************************

    "Everything is Connected"
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0406

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM196AD

A310-57A2088 \-\-- 11/6/06

A310-57-2091 \-\-- 5/22/07

A310-57-2090 \-\-- 5/22/07

A310-57-2090, R01 \-\-- 12/19/07

RI R572-49121, IC \-\-- 5/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
***[2008 OHRP - Research Community Forum]{.underline}***

**[When:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Tuesday, September 16, 2008]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}**

**[Title:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Informed Consent and More:]{.underline}**

**[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[Improving
Human Research Protections]{.underline}**

**[Co-sponsor:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Virginia]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Commonwealth]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[University]{.underline}**

**[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Richmond]{.underline}[, ]{.underline}[VA]{.underline}**

**Collaborators: Bon Secours Health System, Richmond, VA**

** Carilion Health System, Roanoke, VA **

** Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA**

** INOVA Health Systems, Falls Church, VA**

** McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA**

** University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA**

** Virginia Union University, Richmond, VA**

**[Where:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Sheraton Richmond West Hotel]{.underline}**

**[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[6624 West
Broad Street]{.underline}**

**[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[Richmond,
VA 23230]{.underline}**

**[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[804-285-2000 ]{.underline}**

**[Who Should Attend:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[Institutional Officials]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}**

** IRB Chairs, Members & Professionals**

** Principal Investigators**

** Researchers & Research Staff**

** Compliance Officers & Staff**

** Legal Staff**

** Patient Advocates**

**Program Contact: Ms. Zena Bailey**

** Administrative/Office Support Tech **

** Office of Education and Compliance Oversight **

** Office of the Vice President for Research**

** Virginia Commonwealth University **

** 800 E. Leigh St., P.O. Box 980568, **

** Richmond, Virginia 23219 **

** 804-827-2156, fax 804-828-2051**

** zbailey@vcu.edu**
**Presentation to the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities
Advisory Committee**\
**October 23, 2006**

Jerry Barber, CPA, CISA, CGFM

Assistant Comptroller

Office of the State Comptroller

New York State

jbarber@osc.state.ny.us

New York State Education Department

*Reporting of Violent and Disruptive Incidents by Public Schools*

*Report 2005-S-38*

*www.osc.state.ny.us*

Safe Schools Against Violence in Education Act (SAVE)

n Becomes Law in July 2000

n Establish Codes of Conduct for Students

n Requires Development of Comprehensive School Safety Plans

n Update Safety Plans Annually

n **UNIFORM VIOLENT INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM TO BE ESTABLISHED**

Background

n Over 700 Districts in NYS

n Reporting by District and by Each Individual School Within the
District

n Reporting Started with the 2001-02 School Year

n NYS Education Department Summarizes Results and Reports Them to the
Public

[Objectives]{.underline}

n Do schools properly report incidents?

n Does the Education Department accurately compile school incidents
data?

n Are schools properly identified as persistently dangerous?

[Scope]{.underline}

n 9/1/02 -- 2/6/06

n Schools outside of NYC

n SED databases

n 15 school districts:

n 2 large cities,

n 6 small cities,

n 4 suburban cities,

n 3 rural cities.

n 17 high schools and 3 elementary schools

n 2003-2004 incident data

n Surveyed 35 other districts

NY's Uniform Violent Incident\
Reporting System

n 17 Different Types of Incidents

n All Incidents Must Be Reported

n Additional Requirement for Weapons

n System's Name -- Violent and Disruptive Incident Reporting (VADIR)

n Report Due in NYS Education Department by October 31 annually

n Hardcopy Reporting

Audit Results -- In Summary

n System Designed by NYS Education Department Was Comprehensive

n NYS Education Department's Oversight of System Was Weak at Best

n Allowed Schools To Manipulate Data

n Ignored Obvious Underreporting

n Compliance With Reporting Requirements Was Poor

Example of Findings

Example of Findings

n Avoidance of Persistently Dangerous Label

n 21 Schools Received Preliminary Designation

n 4 Schools Remained On List After Data Was Amended

Is this a case of mistakes or deliberate under reporting?

(Or Both?)

Causes of Problems

n Oversight by NYS Education Department Was Weak and Did Not Verify Data

n Training May Not Have Been Effective

Solutions

Verification of Reported Numbers

Analytical Review of Data to Identify Anomalies

Training of District Officials

[Agency Response]{.underline}

n 12 recommendations -- complete agreement

n Immediate State Education follow-up to verify data

n Classification of persistently dangerous schools
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

FAA-2008-0176

DMS Docket Number

2007NM228AD

Directorate (Old) Docket Number, If Any

737-25-1491 \-\-- 4/23/07

737-25-1475 \-\-- 11/26/02

GOODRICH 5A3086/5A3088-25-302, R1 \-\-- 2/19/01

GOODRICH 5A3086/5A3088-25-336 \-\-- 6/17/02

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-309 \-\--10/29/99

GOODRICH 25-308 \-\-- 1/21/00

GOODRICH 25-338, R1 \-\-- 3/31/04

737-25-1404, R1 \-\-- 4/18/02

737-25-1403, R1 \-\-- 11/29/01

737-25-1403 \-\-- 5/4/00

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in
the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.
**Tractor/Plow Boss (Single Resource) S-233**

**Pre-Course Work Questions**

Name: Score:

Home Unit:

Use the following resources to answer the questions:

-   Fireline Handbook

-   Tractor/Plow Boss Position Task Book

-   Incident Response Pocket Guide

-   Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior by
    Hal E. Anderson (April 1982).

**Place answers or an X in the brackets provided throughout the document
as demonstrated in the first question**.

1\. What is the main fuel model at your home unit?

Home unit main fuel model is: Answer here

All weather conditions being equal (wind speed, direction, humidity,
etc.),

comparing your fuel model to fuel model 1, which would have the most
extreme fire

behavior?

a\. Fuel model 1

or

b\. Your fuel model

2\. What type of fire behavior can be expected in fuel model 1 if the
mid-day

temperature is 85 degrees, RH is 30%, midflame winds are 6-10 mph, under
sunny

skies?

a\. Slow, creeping fire.

b\. Average rates of spread, low intensity fire.

c\. Fast moving, high intensity with frequent runs.

d\. Smoldering fire with no visible flames.

3\. What can be done on a going fire to determine the rate of spread?

a\. Measure distances between two points and use a watch to see how long
it takes

the fire to burn between the two points.

b\. Use speedometer on a pick-up truck.

c\. Call F. B. A.

d\. All of the above.

e\. None of the above.

4\. Direct attack on the head of a fire in fuel model 7 with a JD 350
with a 20 foot wind

speed of 20 mph will be successful.

a\. True

b\. False

5\. Before beginning line construction on a wildfire, list four items
that should be

discussed with the tractor/plow operator.

1\.

2\.

3\.

4\.

6\. In a fuel model type 1, on flat terrain (0%) with a mid-day
temperature of 85 degrees,

RH 24%, midflame winds are 8 mph, under sunny skies. What is the
predicted rate of

spread and flame length?

ROS =

\
FL =

7\. On what page of the 2004 Incident Response Pocket Guide can you find
the Dozer

Use Hand Signals?

8\. What does the acronym LCES stand for?

L

C

E

S

9\. How many tractor plow type classes are there?

10\. As a tractor plow boss, what forms might you be required to fill
out? (List at least

four)

1\.

2\.

3\.

4\.

11\. Describe your local tractor plow suppression units and how they are
utilized.

12\. As it relates to fire suppression, what is the most challenging
fuel model in your

area, and why?
**NASA **News

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

**Langley** **Research** **Center**

Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Michael Finneran For release: July 8, 1995

\(804\) 864-8150

RELEASE NO. 95-50

**WIND SHEAR RESEARCH RECOGNIZED WITH DISCOVER MAGAZINE AWARD**

NASA Langley Research CenterÕs efforts to develop a sensor to detect
wind shear ahead of passenger jets have paid off for the first company
to take such a system to the commercial market.

AlliedSignal Commercial Avionics Systems in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., won
an Innovation Award for its work from ÒDiscoverÓ magazine. The award was
announced in the magazineÕs June 1995 issue.

Using technologies developed at Langley in a joint program with industry
and the Federal Aviation Administration, the system gives pilots up to
90 seconds of warning of the hazardous weather phenomenon, which is
characterized by intense downdrafts of air.

These wind shear ÒmicroburstsÓ have been involved in about 30 aircraft
accidents and incidents involving more than 500 fatalities and 200
injuries since 1964, and are considered suspect in the more recent crash
of a DC-9 near Charlotte, N.C.

The first flight of a predictive wind shear system took place on Nov.
30, 1994, when Continental Airlines flight 1637 flew from Washington,
D.C., to Cleveland. The flight capped years of research and field
testing by NASA Langley and AlliedSignal and marked the beginning of the
transfer of that technology to the airline industry.

**- more -**

**- 2 -**

Fred Abbott, ContinentalÕs vice president of flight operations,
characterized the new airborne detection system as Òa breakthrough for
the airline industry in reducing the hazard caused by windshear. Pilots
will now have sufficient warning to avoid an area where windshear is
detected.Ó

Work on windshear systems began at Langley in 1986 and was completed in
1992. The successful transfer of this technology from NASA to industry
was driven by a more than \$20 million NASA and FAA agreement signed in
1986 at the urging of Congress, the National Transportation Safety Board
and the National Research Council.

The funding followed the crash of a Delta flight at Dallas-Fort Worth in
1985, killing 135 people. Under a 1988 FAA directive, windshear
detection devices were to be installed on airplanes by the end of 1993.
However, airlines electing an advance-warning system have until the end
of 1995 to install them.

**- end -**
Originally designed as a \"hip and cool\" device for people to get
around their communities, the Segway has become, in some respects, a
\'standing wheelchair\' for many of us for whom a wheelchair is not
required. It offers unlimited indoor and outdoor mobility, quiet
operation, safety, and increased longer-distance mobility. In addition,
it offers greater health benefits because of the reduction in the amount
of time we spend sitting on a daily basis, and greater dignity because
of the ability to carry on conversations at eye height with a standing
person instead of at navel height. This is not to say that a wheelchair
is not dignified in any way- those who rely on wheelchairs for their
mobility are undoubtedly grateful for the mobility they offer- but
simply to point out that standing is more similar to walking than
sitting is.
+----------------------------------+
| **Vicki Sandiford/RTP/USEPA/US** |
|                                  |
| 11/16/2007 01:52 PM              |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+
|                                  |
+----------------------------------+

    Hi Vicki,

    Sorry this got so complicated - we don't know what happened to the comments Mary Bomar signed (signed copy attached), but she definitely signed them.

    Is it possible to replace what's in the docket with the signed version?

    Thanks.  

    Ellen Porter

    Air Resources Division

    National Park Service

    Phone: (303) 969-2617

    Fax: (303) 969-2822

    e-mail: ellen_porter@nps.gov
# [TIP OF THE WEEK ]{.underline}

**[1. Lockdown, shelter procedures are the
sam]{.underline}[e]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}**

[Some disaster scenarios require you to look closely at who enters and
leaves your hospital. Whether you\'re trying to keep contaminated people
from entering (known as a lockdown), or you want to prevent people
inside the building from going outside and being exposed to dangerous
gas (known as shelter in place), send security staff to close all
entrances and exits. ]{.underline}

**[Use the following checklist during lockdown or shelter in place
events]{.underline}[:]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}**

-   [Verify the incident with a second source such as the local police
    department. When confirmed, follow your crowd control and
    decontamination plans. ]{.underline}

-   [Communicate with the hospital\'s administration. Use the
    switchboard to connect to the emergency operations center.
    ]{.underline}

-   [During a shelter in place event, contact the boiler room to turn
    off all air handling systems and close the air ducts. This will
    prevent hazardous vapors from coming into the facility.
    ]{.underline}

-   [Contact security to begin lockdown/shelter in place procedures.
    Move signs and placards from the basement storeroom to the correct
    entrances and exits. ]{.underline}

-   [Call the correct lockdown/shelter in place code on the overhead
    paging system. Start shelter procedures by looking at the staff
    response wall chart and your department\'s disaster manual.
    ]{.underline}

-   [Close the emergency department to internal disasters only. Notify
    county and city officials of the situation. ]{.underline}

-   [Have the emergency department set up decontamination and triage
    stations outside when safe to do so. ]{.underline}

-   [Assign staff to open and operate a labor pool in the emergency
    operations center. ]{.underline}

-   [Prepare informational overhead announcements to inform staff,
    patients, and visitors. ]{.underline}

-   [Prepare a situation status report for police, fire, and other
    agencies. ]{.underline}

-   [Prepare press releases for the media. ]{.underline}

**[From: HCProfessor(TM) online course]{.underline}[:]{.underline}[
]{.underline}**
**Affidavit**

State of Colorado

County of Garfield

I, Rhonda Renee Krell, attest that my birth name is Rhonda Renee
Lehrkamp, which I used until the date of marriage to David G Speirs on
July 2, 1971 in Pierre, SD. Said marriage was terminated by divorce on
April 26,1978. During the time of this marriage and until the time that
I married Richard D. Krell my legal name was Rhonda R Speirs.

I further attest, that I married Richard D. Krell on May 31, 1986 in
Pierre, SD and that we are currently married.
**Training Documentation**

**Hearing Loss Prevention Training Package**

**(PART TO BE COMPLETED BY THE TRAINEE)**

MODULE:

DATE: SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:

NAME (PLEASE PRINT):

TITLE:

SERVICE:

VAMC:

**(PART TO BE COMPLETED BY THE INSTRUCTOR)**

In order for a certificate of training to be prepared, instructors
should complete the following part and return this form to:

Employee Education System Little Rock Center (138E)

Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System

North Little Rock Division

2200 Fort Roots Drive

North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114-1706

INSTRUCTOR'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT):

INSTRUCTOR'S SIGNATURE
**September 29, 2006**

**Statement of Work**

**Dvir Blivis**

**Dr. Dvir Blivis is coming to NIH (10/18/06 0 11/18/06) to perform
collaborative work on a project concerned with the role of funicular
neurons in locomotor-like activity in the neonatal mouse. Specifically,
he will cut and stain sections of the spinal cord that have been labeled
with fluorescent dyes. He will analyze these sections on a confocal
microscope and record and tabulate his findings. He will also perform
morphological analysis on the anatomical material with special
consideration of the synaptic connections of the labeled funicular
neurons with motoneurons.**

**Dr. Michael O'Donovan, Chief Investigator, DNS, DIR, NINDS would like
to provide Dr. Blivis with lodging and meals while at NIH, and reimburse
his airfare. **

**Airfare \$1,973.14**

**Lodging \$1,449.00**

**Meals \$1,050.00**

**TOTAL \$4,472.14**

**Request that a check be issued for meals and lodging in the amount of
\$2499 by no later than October 20, 2006. **

**Reimbursement for airfare will be requested upon submission of airline
ticket stub.**

**The period of performance shall be October 18, 2006 through November
30, 2006.**
Conference, Administrative & Travel Services (CATS)

Statement of Work -- Shlomo A.Trachtenberg, Ph.D.

Scientist will be studying at the molecular level the structural basis
of cell motility in the model organism Spiroplasma. In earlier
collaboration with our lab and that of Richard Leapman (DBEPS/ORS), he
has found that the cytoskeleton of Spiroplasma is in the form of a flat
ribbon comprised of seven fibers attached to the cell membrane; it is
responsible for maintaining the helical shape of the cell as well as for
its motility. This organization of the ribbon has now been confirmed by
sophisticated EM tomography analysis of whole cells, as well as of
isolated membrane fractions. Interestingly, it conflicts with results
recently published by others in *Science*. Now, Dr. Trachtenberg will
finish refining the existing tomographic data sets and write up the
results, which, clearly need to be published ASAP.

We wish to provide airfare/ground transportation and per diem for Dr.
Trachtenberg's services.

Funding for per diem: \$ 4,020.00

Airfare: 1,465.00

TOTAL \$ 5,485.00

Request (one) check for per diem.and airfare/travel expenses in the
amount of \$5,485.00.

Check will be mailed to Project Officer:

Linda A. Franklin

Building 10, Room 5N220

10 Center Drive MSC 1426

Bethesda, MD 20892-1426.
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| *     | **Tes | **Lab | **    | **L   | **U   | **U   | *     |
| *Anal | tID** | C     | Calcu | T-MDL | pdate | pdate | *Upda |
| yte** |       | ode** | lated | in    | L     | LRL   | te?** |
|       |       |       | LT-   | use** | T-MDL | To:** |       |
|       |       |       | MDL** |       | To:** |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| OIL&G | 0     | 2125  | 2.274 | 3     |       |       | N     |
| REASE | 0556B |       |       |       |       |       |       |
| EP    |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
| A1664 |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| **Tes | *     | **    | **N** | **    | **F   | *     | *     |
| tID** | *Labc | Solut |       | Expec | alse  | *P-va | *dist |
|       | ode** | ion** |       | ted** | Neg** | lue** | ribut |
|       |       |       |       |       |       |       | ion** |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| 0     | 2125  | 04    | 24    | 10.5  | 0     | 0     | N     |
| 0556B |       | 6005W |       |       |       | .6467 | ormal |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       | 04Bk  | 13    | .     | 0     | 0     | N     |
|       |       |       |       |       |       | .4499 | ormal |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       | 05    | 23    | 11.11 | 0     | 0     | N     |
|       |       | 6019W |       |       |       | .2046 | ormal |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       | 05Bk  | 13    | .     | 0     | 0     | N     |
|       |       |       |       |       |       | .3922 | ormal |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       | 06    | 14    | 8     | 0     | 0     | N     |
|       |       | GWY06 |       |       |       | .5038 | ormal |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|       |       |       |       |       |       |       |       |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
EXPLANATION TO PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS (52.214‑6) (APR 1984)

    Any prospective bidder desiring an explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must request it in writing soon enough to allow a reply to reach all prospective bidders before the submission of their bids. Oral explanations or instructions given before the award of a contract will not be binding.  Any information given a prospective bidder concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective bidders as an amendment to the solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting bids or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective bidders.

    (End of provision)
CONTRACT DEFINITIZATION (52.216‑25) (APR 1984)‑‑ALTERNATE I (APR 1984)

    	(a) A ......................... [insert specific type of contract] definitive contract is contemplated.  The Contractor agrees to begin promptly negotiating with the Contracting Officer the terms of a definitive contract that will include (1) all clauses required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) on the date of execution of the letter contract, (2) all clauses required by law on the date of execution of the definitive contract, and (3) any other mutually agreeable clauses, terms, and conditions.  The Contractor agrees to submit a ................. ......................... [insert specific type  of proposal (e.g., fixed‑price or cost‑and‑fee)] proposal and cost or pricing data supporting its proposal.

    	(b) The schedule for definitizing this contract is [insert target date for definitization of the contract and dates for submission of proposal, beginning of negotiations, and, if appropriate, submission of make‑or‑buy and subcontracting plans and cost or pricing data]:

    ................................................................

    ................................................................

    ................................................................

    	(c) If agreement on a definitive contract to supersede this letter contract is not reached by the target date in paragraph (b) above, or within any extension of it granted by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the head of the contracting activity, determine a reasonable price or fee in accordance with Subpart 15.8 and Part 31 of the FAR, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the Disputes clause.  In any event, the Contractor shall proceed with completion of the contract, subject only to the Limitation of Government Liability clause.

    		(1) After the Contracting Officer's determination of price or fee, the contract shall be governed by‑‑

    			(i) All clauses required by the FAR on the date of execution of this letter contract for either fixed‑price or cost‑ reimbursement contracts, as determined by the Contracting Officer under this paragraph (c);

    			(ii) All clauses required by law as of the date of the Contracting Officer's determination; and

    			(iii) Any other clauses, terms, and conditions mutually agreed upon.

    		(2) To the extent consistent with subparagraph (c)(1) above, all clauses, terms, and conditions included in this letter contract shall continue in effect, except those that by their nature apply only to a letter contract.

    	(d) The definitive contract resulting from this letter contract will include a negotiated .................... [insert "price ceiling" or "firm fixed price"] in no event to exceed .................... [insert the proposed price upon which the award was based].

    (End of clause)
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0413

Directorate Identifier: 2008NM003AD

737-27-1284 \-\-- 11/28/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
+---------------------------------------+
| **\"Lacey, Pam\" \<PLacey@aga.org\>** |
|                                       |
| 06/16/2008 05:21 PM                   |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+
|                                       |
+---------------------------------------+

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attached for filing in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0238 are comments of
the American Gas Association (AGA) on the proposed general permit
issuance.

Respectfully submitted,

Pamela A. Lacey

Pamela A. Lacey

Senior Managing Counsel

American Gas Association

400 North Capitol St. N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

office: (202) 824-7340

mobile: (202) 236-0705

Please visit the AGA Web site at
--
  --

    Dear EPA:

    As one of many concerned citizens, I am writing to express my complete and utter support of EPA's initiation of a veto of the Yazoo Pumps Project under section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act. I do not support any project that would result in an unacceptable loss of wetlands, and I consider the Yazoo Pumps to be one of those kinds of projects.  Also, as a student training to be a professional in the natural resources field, I want to be able to promote Mississippi's natural treasures. Such a costly project, which will waste at least $211 million federal tax dollars, will obscure the image of natural beauty housed in the great state of Mississippi. 

    Mississippi is privileged to have wetlands that are considered to be among the richest natural resources in the nation. If the Yazoo Pumps project was to be deployed, it would degrade the very natural entity that natural resource professionals strive to sell to wildlife recreation participants, including both consumptive and non-consumptive users.  The wetlands that would be drained are critical habitat for the Louisiana black bear that wildlife watchers love to observe.  Not to mention the wetlands are also located along a vital migration route for 20 percent of our country's duck population. This would be even more troublesome for natural resources managers because their job is to maintain sustainable populations of wildlife species for the public to enjoy.

    In summary, the Yazoo Pumps project would cause significant degradation of the aquatic environment, including impacts to fish and wildlife.  I urge EPA to finalize its veto of this project under section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act.

    Sincerely,

    Vanessa Oquendo

    1692 Buntin Drive #3

    Starkville, MS 39759
*Version 4, 99-04-02*

**[SPECIAL WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS FOR]{.underline}**

**[MARS MISSION INTEROPERABILITY]{.underline}**

**[Newport Beach, California]{.underline}**

**[12 May 1999]{.underline}**

**[Hosted by:]{.underline}**

**[Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS)]{.underline}**

**[JPL Telecommunications and Mission Operations Directorate
(TMOD)]{.underline}**

**[JPL Mars Exploration Directorate (MED)]{.underline}**

**[[Objectives:]{.underline}]{.smallcaps}**

1\. [Discuss the need for communications and navigation services for the
international \"Mars Armada\".]{.underline}

2\. [Identify issues associated with provision these services on an
international basis:]{.underline}

§ [ground infrastructure]{.underline}

§ [in-situ Mars infrastructure]{.underline}

3\. [Formulate recommendations for coordinating future Mars mission
interoperability.]{.underline}

**[[Draft Agenda:]{.underline}]{.smallcaps}**

[07:45 Registration and coffee]{.underline}

[08:15 Welcome and Introduction s Hooke/JPL]{.underline}

[ Review of objectives and agenda]{.underline}

***[Session 1: Orientation and Overview]{.underline}***

[08:30 Summary of Mars missions, 1999-2010 Bourke/JPL]{.underline}

[09:00 Summary of DSN Mars support plans Miller/Noreen/JPL]{.underline}

[09:30 Summary of Mars Network planning Edwards/Rosell/JPL]{.underline}

[10:00 Summary of CCSDS standards plans Hooke/JPL]{.underline}

[10:15 Break]{.underline}

***[Session 2: Ground Support of the Mars Armada]{.underline}***

[10:30 Mars Armada Ground Tracking Resources
Connally/Hansen/JPL]{.underline}

[10:50 Ground Navigation Strategy for Mars Approach
Kallemeyn/JPL]{.underline}

[11:20 DSN Support Issues and Recommendations Connally/JPL]{.underline}

[11:45 Discussion: needs for ground network Moderator:
Miller/JPL]{.underline}

[cross-support coordination]{.underline}

[12:15 Lunch]{.underline}

***[Session 3: Mars Proximity Link Coordination]{.underline}***

[13:15 Mars Express Proximity Services McCoy/ESTEC]{.underline}

[13:45 NetLander Overview Ribes/CNES]{.underline}

[14:05 Summary of in-situ Mars Communications needs
Butman/JPL]{.underline}

[14:30 Mars Proximity Link Data Rates & Frequencies Ribes/CNES,
Kwan&Vyas/JPL]{.underline}

[14:50 Mars Proximity Link Protocol MacMedan/JPL]{.underline}

[15:10 In-situ Mars Navigation needs/techniques
Kallemeyn/JPL]{.underline}

[15:35 Break]{.underline}

[15:50 Discussion: needs for in space Moderator: Hooke/JPL]{.underline}

[interoperability coordination]{.underline}

[16:50 Formulation of Issues and recommendations Miller,
Hooke/JPL]{.underline}

[17:30 Adjourn]{.underline}

**[Workshop Organizers:]{.underline}**

[CCSDS: Adrian Hooke +1.818.354.3063 ]{.underline}**[[
]{#_Hlt447694861}]{.underline}**

[TMOD: Gary Noreen +1.818.354.2699 ]{.underline}**[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}**

[MED: Stan Butman +1.818.354.7948 ]{.underline}**[ ]{.underline}[
]{.underline}**
**Amendment?** [U. S. D e p a r t m e n t o f t h e I n t e r i o
r]{.smallcaps} **BUREAU \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Foreign Travel Certification Form** **Date Initiated [ / /
]{.underline}**

Traveler\'s Name, Phone & Fax Number: ** **

Position Title, Grade, Duty Station:

**Purpose of Travel:** Reimbursable Agreement (PASA,etc) Official USG
Delegate Employee Training/Development

Professional/Scientific Meetings Field Work Other \_\_\_

**Justification for Travel**: Explain objective of trip, role of
traveler, importance of trip to Bureau Mission, consequence if travel
does not occur, etc.

  ---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               
                               
  Costs During Travel Period   Will other donor or employee reimburse cost?\_\_\_\_Yes**\*** \_\_\_\_\_\_No (If \"yes,\" complete following)
                               
                               Name of Donor: 1. 2.
  Salary \$                    Salary \$ \$
  Per Diem \$                  Per Diem \$ \$
  Transportation \$            Transportation \$ \$
  Other (Conf.fees, etc.) \$   Other (Conf. fees, etc.) \$ \$
                               
  TOTAL \$                     TOTAL \$ \$
                               
  ---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**\*** Use of non-Federal funds requires additional clearances under 31
USC Section 1353.

I HEREBY APPROVE THE TRAVEL AND CERTIFY that the travel proposed is
essential and supported by the following considerations. Explain on
reverse items not checked below:

1.\_\_\_ Travel is limited to *the minimum necessary to accomplish the
agency\'s program* (41 CFR 301);

2.\_\_ Clearance by the US Mission/Embassy has been requested and travel
will not occur if US Mission/Embassy objects;

3.\_\_ Traveler will issue a report within ten (10) days of return to be
distributed to interested officials to share in the benefits;

4.\_\_\_ Annual leave of more than one workday is described here or is
attached;\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

5.\_\_ No other Bureau employees are known to be traveling to this
destination at this time. If not checked, give names of other bureau
officials to attend:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature of head of Bureau) (Date)

Approved: Concur:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Assistant Secretary) (Date) (Assistant Secretary PMB) (Date)

Form DI-1175

(Rev. Aug. 1994)
**[Statement of Work]{.underline}**

**Yu-Chuan (Jack) Li, Ph.D.**

**National Yang-Ming University**

**Taipei, Taiwan**

Dr. Li is coming to NIH to work with Dr. Yang Fann, Ph.D., on the
collaborative research project of integrative biomedical research
databases for neuroscience. The project is based on the integration of
bioinformatics such as microarray and genomics data as well as clinical
informatics such as EHR and imaging data with data mining and knowledge
discovery tools.

It is requested that the contract awardee provide to the project officer
a check in the amount of \$6,000 made payable to Dr. Li.

The period of performance is June 15, 2007 to September 30, 2007.

The \$6,000 check should be sent to the project officer at the
following:

Linda A. Franklin

NIH/NINDS/AO

10 Center Drive, Room 5N220

Bldg.10/5N220 MSC1426

Bethesda, MD 20892-1426
**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT**

**EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA**

**RALEIGH DIVISION**

**IN RE: **

**JOHN Q. PUBLIC **

** DEBTOR**

**CASE NO.**

**12-34567-8-ATS **

**APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION**

Comes now the debtor, and requests the Court to approve a pro bono or
low cost mental health evaluation, and states as follows:

1\. ab The debtor's mental health is a genuine issue of material fact to
these bankruptcy proceedings in that . . . . (state relevance, examples:
the debtor claims that debtor's mental health is relevant to the
debtor's failure to attend meeting of creditors or hearings; the debtor
claims that debtor's mental health is relevant to allegations related to
challenges to the debtor's general discharge (Section 727) or arguments
for an exception to discharge based upon fraud allegations (Section
523(a)(2)); the debtor seeks to discharge student loans based upon
mental illness under Section 523(a)(8) or 42 U.S.C. 294g; the debtor
seeks to avoid a default judgment based upon excusable neglect; or the
debtor seeks to exempt personal injury award related to mental health);

2\. ab Based upon information and belief, the debtor's mental health
should be examined by a mental health professional to determine whether
the debtor may have . . . (examples: manic depression, bipolar disorder,
schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder), or another recognized
mental illness;

3\. ab Based upon the bankruptcy schedules and the debtor's available
income and assets as follows, (set out monthly income and any liquid
assets), the debtor is currently unable to pay for a mental health
evaluation that is necessary and relevant to bankruptcy issues
presented;

4\. ab After making diligent efforts to obtain mental health services to
assist the debtor, the debtor has been unable to obtain relevant
services based upon available health insurance, public health programs,
or other third party services.

5\. ab A copy of this application has been transmitted to the Bankruptcy
Administrator and (identify any other interested party).

Wherefore, based upon the foregoing, the debtor respectfully requests
that the Court approve a pro bono or low cost mental health evaluation
in this case.

**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT**

**EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA**

**RALEIGH DIVISION**

**IN RE: **

**JOHN Q. PUBLIC **

** DEBTOR**

**CASE NO.**

**12-34567-8-ATS **

**ORDER**

Based upon the Application for Approval of Mental Health Evaluation by
the debtor and the representations contained therein, the Court approves
the debtor's request for a pro bono or low cost mental health evaluation
for purposes of this action.

**SO ORDERED**.

DATED:  

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Bankruptcy Judge