BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0194

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM263AD

MPG-1483/A2.4, R5 \-\-- 3/22/07

MPG-1483/A2.5, R5 \-\-- 3/22/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
***What does O.F. mean? *Obligate Funds**:

If a vehicle has an **O.F. **next to it, it means the vehicle can no
longer be ordered because the manufacturer has closed out ordering.
Manufacturers close out ordering during the spring/summer months to get
ready for the production of the new model year vehicles.

If a vehicle has been closed out, you can still obligate your current
year funds for a next model year vehicle under the Summer Program.

**AutoChoiceSummer Program**

***AutoChoiceSummer Program** *-- Obligating Funds for Closed Out
Vehicles **\
\
**Instructions for using the Summer Program**\
\
1.Follow the normal AutoChoice procedures for selecting a vehicle and
placing an order into your Garage.\
\
2. While in the garage, select the orders to be submitted to GSA against
expiring funds. Add additional 5% to the 2007 vehicle price to account
for pricing adjustments. Click the \<Finalize\> button.\
\
3. You will receive an email acknowledgement stating that your funds
have been obligated to GSA. This email will also list the RPN number
(GSA case number) assigned to each order.\
\
4. GSA will then notify you by e-mail when new model year pricing and
specifications are available in October.\
\
5. You will then be required to re-configure each order with the new
model year pricing, option and color availability. If you do not
re-configure your orders, your orders will not be placed and will remain
in the garage.

6\. You then must re-submit the finalized order to GSA for processing.
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0357

Directorate Identifier: 2008NM005AD

737-54-1044 \-\-- 12/10/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained
in the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# [VA readying for bioterrorism attack, installing decontamination]{.underline}

**centers at hospitals**

By Suzanne Gamboa\
ASSOCIATED PRESS

May 23, 2002

WASHINGTON -- The government is installing biological decontamination
centers at some veterans hospitals as part of a homeland preparedness
plan that could cost up to \$200 million, Veterans Affairs Secretary
Anthony Principi said Thursday.

Principi also said he would consider suspending the VA\'s policy of open
enrollment for all veterans to reduce a backlog of treatment requests
and maintain the quality of care provided at agency facilities.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Principi said the VA should
play a key role in homeland defense. The duties will be determined by
Congress and the Bush administration, but Principi said he envisions VA
hospitals being used to treat victims, store and disseminate medicines,
and offer other health care assistance.

Some VA hospitals already are being outfitted with decontamination
units, he said, noting Washington, D.C., is among them. \"We are looking
at the large urban areas that may be subject to attack and trying to
establish those units in those locations,\" Principi said.

The House on Monday passed legislation authorizing \$100 million for
four new VA research centers aimed at combatting bioterrorism.

The centers would focus on research and response to potential chemical,
biological and radiological terrorist attacks. They also would provide
related education and training to health professionals and assist local
authorities with laboratory work in time of emergency.

The VA is taking on the additional homeland defense duties at a time
when Principi said the agency is struggling under a \"burgeoning,
staggering workload\" and veterans sometimes are waiting months for
care.

The nation has about 25 million veterans. Although not all use the VA,
all are eligible under the open enrollment policy Congress mandated.

\"In the past, the easy decision has been to let everyone come in
whether you can treat them or not, just put them on waiting lists,\" he
said. \"I have a problem with that. I don\'t think it\'s fair to people
to say we have open enrollment and put them on a waiting list.\"

Principi had proposed charging veterans with higher incomes co-payments
totaling up to \$1,500 for services, but Congress balked at the idea.
Without such a co-pay, the VA will need about \$1 billion more to
maintain its current level of service, he said.

President Bush wants \$1.5 billion more for the VA in 2003, which would
be a record increase for the agency.

The House has included about \$417 million in a supplemental spending
bill for VA health care this year. The Senate version includes an equal
amount, plus \$1.1 billion for pensions and compensation, the VA said.

That combination may be enough for the VA to continue providing services
at the current level, Principi said. But if it doesn\'t, \"we will
suspend enrollment for a period of time until we get it under control,
then we\'ll reopen enrollment.\"
Aircraft ref. #1 N6717Q Serial#1711 converted to tall tail at one time

Owner Kuther Air Service 405 3rd Av Nez Perce ID 83543

When we removed rudder harness from button of rudder there was water in
the lower part of the tube

and rust. We cut off the attachment plate and cleaned up rust and added
a reinforcement tube inside

the rudder tube and welded in with rosets. The welded on the attachment
plate and added the linseed

oil and plugged the hole with sealer. Repairs were done in accordance
with part 43.13 1B par 4-84

fig. 4-37. All welding done with tig process.

Aircraft ref. #2 N48559 Serial#73B converted to tall tail at one time

Owner Fountain Inc. PO Box 9424 Moscow ID 83843

A lot of rust was found in the lower tube also and was repaired in the
same manner as aircraft ref. #1.

Aircraft ref. #3 N7502C Serial #817B

Owner Darrell Fender PO Box 143 Colfax WA 99111

Large amounts of loose rust were found, resolved same manner as aircraft
ref. #1.

Aircraft ref. #4 N7983 Serial #847

Owner John Webb Rt 2 Box 37 Reubens ID 83548

This aircraft was applicable to the first AD. It had been treated back
when AD came out and had the

outside physical part of AD completed as per AD. Inside was rusty as
linseed oil had pretty much

dried up. Resolved in the same manner as aircraft ref. #1.

Aircraft ref. #5 N111AG Looked good re-applied linseed oil and sealed.

Aircraft ref. #6 N8005C Looked good re-applied linseed oil and sealed.

Aircraft ref. #7 N3633T Cleaned up and redid

Aircraft ref. #8 N8974H Cleaned up and redid

Aircraft ref. #9 N6628Q Okay retreat and sealed

Aircraft ref. #10 N27SK Light rust cleaned out, treated and sealed

Aircraft ref. #11 N6774Q Okay retreat and sealed

Aircraft ref. #12 N8130K Okay retreat and sealed

Aircraft ref.#13 N8150K Light rust, cleaned, treated and sealed
MINIMAL TRIANGULATIONS OF SPHERE BUNDLES OVER S^1^, J. Chestnut^1^, [J.
Sapir]{.underline}^[2]{.underline}^, E. Swartz\*^3^, University of
California, Berkeley^1^, Math department, Berkeley, CA 94720, University
of Chicago^2^, Math department, Chicago, IL 60637, Cornell
University^3^, Math department, Ithaca, NY 14853, ebs22@cornell.edu

We exhibit vertex-minimal triangulations of all sphere bundles over
S^1^, proving which ones are unique. This is only the second infinite
family of manifolds for which minimal triangulations are known.
**Materials Not Included in**

**Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

FAA-2007-0049

DMS Docket Number

2007NM168AD

Directorate (Old) Docket Number, If Any

737-54-1043 \-\-- 5/2/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in
the

Supplemental AD Docket

**MAY BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.
+----------------------------------------------+
| **\"Russell, Luke\" \<LRussell@coeur.com\>** |
|                                              |
| 01/21/2008 11:24 AM                          |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+
|                                              |
+----------------------------------------------+

Dear Sirs:

Attached please find comments from Coeur d'Alene Mines on the above
Guidance Document.

Thank your for your consideration of these comments

Luke Russell

VP Environmental Services

Coeur d'Alene Mines
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2003, p. 73-77, Vol. 41, No.
1\
0095-1137/03/\$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.73-77.2003\
[[Copyright ](/misc/terms.shtml)[©](/misc/terms.shtml)[
2003](/misc/terms.shtml)]{.underline}, [[American Society for
Microbiology](http://www.asmusa.org)]{.underline}. All Rights Reserved.

**Serotyping of 467 *Cryptococcus neoformans* Isolates from Clinical and
Environmental Sources in Brazil: Analysis of Host and Regional Patterns
**

Marília M. Nishikawa,^1\*^ Márcia S. Lazera,^2^ Glaucia G. Barbosa,^1^
Luciana Trilles,^2^ Beatriz R. Balassiano,^1^ Regina C. L. Macedo,^2^
Cláudia C. F. Bezerra,^2^ Maurício A. Pérez,^3^ Paola Cardarelli,^4^ and
Bodo Wanke^2^

Fungal Section,^1^ Molecular Biology Section, National Institute for
Quality Control in Health, INCQS/FIOCRUZ,^4^ Mycology Service, Evandro
Chagas Institute of Clinical Research, IPEC/FIOCRUZ,^2^ Center of
Community Health Studies, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil^3^

Received 19 June 2002/ Returned for modification 8 August 2002/ Accepted
27 September 2002

*Cryptococcus neoformans* is an important zoopathogen, and it^\ ^is one
of the most prevalent lethal mycotic agents. Its
polysaccharide^\ ^capsule, synthesized in vivo and in vitro, is a
virulence factor,^\ ^contains predominantly glucuronoxylomannan, and is
responsible^\ ^for the antigenic differentiation of serotypes A, B, C,
D, and^\ ^AD. A total of 467 isolates of *C. neoformans* obtained from
clinical^\ ^and environmental sources from Brazilian regions were
studied^\ ^serologically by using the Crypto Check Iatron RM 304-K
kit.^\ ^Serotyping of the clinical isolates showed the following
prevalences^\ ^of the serotypes: A (77.95%), followed by B (18.2%), AD
(1.3%),^\ ^D (0.4%), C (0.2%), and untypeable (1.93%). The
epidemiology^\ ^of serotype A in the Brazilian southern and southeastern
regions^\ ^reproduces the picture observed worldwide. In contrast,
serotype^\ ^B was the most frequent agent of cryptococcosis in the
northeastern^\ ^region, occurring nearly equally in male and female
healthy^\ ^hosts. Among the isolates from environmental sources,
serotypes^\ ^A and B were found to occur in the hollows of tropical
trees^\ ^of the genera *Cassia*, *Ficus*, and *Moquillea*. The few
isolates^\ ^from *Eucalyptus camaldulensis* debris were serotypes A and
B^\ ^and untypeable. Overall, no association with a specific
host^\ ^tree was identified for these serotypes, denoting a
distinct^\ ^ecoepidemiological regional pattern. The one serotype C
isolate^\ ^was recovered from a human immunodeficiency virus-negative
host.^\ ^Serotype AD predominated over serotype D among both
clinical^\ ^and environmental isolates.^\ ^

\* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de Microbiologia
do INCQS, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Avenida Brasil 4365,
Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21045-900 Brazil. Phone: 55-21-25731072.
Fax: 55-21-22900915. E-mail:
[<marilia@alpha.incqs.fiocruz.br>]{.underline}.
**[DUPONT ORDERED TO PAY SURVIVORS OF ASBESTOS VICTIMS MORE THAN \$7
MILLION]{.underline}**

**[The Associated Pres]{.underline}[s]{.underline}[ ]{.underline}**

**[Posted March 6 2002, 1:48 PM EST]{.underline}**[ ]{.underline}

**[CHARLESTON, W.Va.]{.underline}**[ \-- A Kanawha County jury has
ordered DuPont to pay \$6.4 million to the family of a man who died
after being exposed as a child to asbestos fibers in his father\'s work
clothes.]{.underline}

[The verdict was one of five that jurors delivered last Friday following
a three-week trial before two judges appointed by the state Supreme
Court to handle all asbestos-related claims.]{.underline}\
\
[In the first claim, Leonard Dale Cox, chief executive officer of the
Bank of Gassaway in Braxton County, died in 2000 at the age of 53 from
mesothelioma, a rare and fatal tumor in the lining of the
lung.]{.underline}\
\
[Cox had never worked with asbestos but his father, Cecil Cox, had
installed asbestos insulation at DuPont\'s Belle plant from the 1940s
until he retired in the 1970s, according to court records.]{.underline}\
\
[Leonard Cox\'s survivors sued DuPont, alleging the company was
responsible for his death.]{.underline}\
\
[The jury\'s award includes \$1.7 million for Cox\'s lost earnings, \$2
million for Cox\'s widow, \$300,000 to each of his two children for
their loss, another \$2 million for his pain and suffering and \$118,000
for medical bills.]{.underline}\
\
[In another claim, jurors awarded \$600,000 to the widow of Roy
Lupardis, a DuPont laborer and mechanic who had worked at the Belle
plant for 35 years.]{.underline}\
\
[Jurors rejected a similar claim filed by the family of Robert Pritt,
another longtime worker at the plant who died from mesothelioma last
year.]{.underline}\
\
[Bernard Belville, a contract worker, was awarded \$24,800. Belville had
attributed asbestos-related thickening of the lining of his lungs to his
10 weeks of work at the Belle plant.]{.underline}\
\
[Jurors rejected a similar claim filed by the family of Page Humphreys,
another contract employee who had worked at DuPont\'s Parkersburg plant
in 1960.]{.underline}\
\
[The case was heard by retired Kanawha County Circuit Judge Andrew
MacQueen and Ohio County Circuit Judge Martin Gaughan, and originally
involved more than 60 plaintiffs and several other companies. All but
the five claims against DuPont were settled before the trial\'s opening
statements.]{.underline}\
\
[MacQueen was appointed by the state Supreme Court last year to hear all
asbestos-related claims. In its ruling on July 6, 2001, the court
acknowledged MacQueen\'s knowledge of the complex lawsuits and his
successful handling of tens of thousands of past asbestos claims, but
said it would call on other judges to help him. ]{.underline}
+--------------------------------------------+
| **\"Hunt, Tim\" \<Tim_Hunt@afandpa.org\>** |
|                                            |
| 02/05/2009 11:49 AM                        |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+
|                                            |
+--------------------------------------------+

Here are the American Forest & Paper Association's comments on Docket
OAR 2060-0640 concerning the Compliance Parameter Monitoring System
proposal.

Timothy Hunt

Senior Director, Air Quality Programs

American Forest & Paper Association

1111 19th St., NW

Washington, DC 20036

phone: 202-463-2588
The element contains an error. The phrase \"not otherwise described\"
must point somewhere else than the functional specification in order to
make sense. As it is, this element in the CC makes no sense, saying in
effect that the functional specification must contain what it does not
contain.

Cheers,

Gary

PS: I really wonder if CC v3 is getting the vetting it needs to overcome
such errors. Maybe organizations are forgoing involvement in the CC
process. NIST, for example, appears to have decided to put its resources
elsewhere.

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* Opinions are not intended to reflect an official position of JHU/APL
\*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* Gary Stoneburner \*

\* Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory \*

\* 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, MS 17-N406 \*

\* Laurel, MD 20723-6099 \*

\* Phone: 240-228-2628 (WA DC), 443-778-2628 (Baltimore) \*

\* Fax: 240-228-6391 (WA DC), 443-778-6391 (Baltimore) \*

\* Gary.Stoneburner@jhuapl.edu \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\-\-\-\--Original Message\-\-\-\--

From: cc-cmt@nist.gov \[mailto:cc-cmt@nist.gov\] On Behalf Of YOKOTA
HIROFUMI

Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:11 PM

To: Multiple recipients of list

Subject: The meaning of \"not otherwise described\"

Hi,

Could someone explain?

Is it easy to read the following statement?

ADV_FSP.6.7C The functional specification shall describe all error
messages

contained in the TSF implementation that are not otherwise described in
the

functional specification. \[CC Part3 V3.0 Revision 2\]

Here, I find the next two phrases (A and B) are combined into one.

A\) The functional specification shall describe all error messages
contained

in the TSF implementation.

B\) those error messages are not otherwise described in the functional

specification.

Is \"A\" sufficient without \"B\", isn\'t it?

What additional condition be placed by \"B\"?

Thanks advanced!

Regards,

Hirofumi Yokota