BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 697091

## Acute Care Documentation in Hospital EHR System

                                    AHIC EHR WG
				September 10, 2008

- Acute Care Documentation in Hospital EHR System
-                                     AHIC EHR WG
- 				September 10, 2008

- Electronic Order Set Coordinator
- _[antonbb@upmc.edu](mailto:antonbb@upmc.edu)_
- Melanie Shatzer, MSN, RN
- Administrative Director,
- Nursing Discovery and Innovation
- _[shatzermb@upmc.edu](mailto:shatzermb@upmc.edu)_
- Kelley Szelc, BSN RN
- Training Specialist/Analyst
- _[szelcka2@upmc.edu](mailto:szelcka2@upmc.edu)_

**    **

**University of Pittsburgh Medical Center****St. Margaret Hospital**

**    **

**University of Pittsburgh Medical Center****St. Margaret Hospital**

- 250 bed community hospital
- Acute care and teaching hospital
- 800 primary care and specialty physicians
- 1500 clinical and support staff members
- St. Margaret School of Nursing Program (RN)
- St Margaret School of Licensed Practical 	Nurse (LPN)
- One of 19 Hospitals in the UPMC system
- 2004 implemented electronic health record

## University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterSt. Margaret

**    **

-  2007
-   -14,021 inpatient admissions
-   -253,841 outpatient visits
-   -37,511 ED visits
-   -12,969 surgeries

**    **

**What influences success?**

- Administrative team support
- 	-CEO
- 	-CNO
- 	-CIO
- 	-Physician Champion
- Clinicians’ input

**    **

**What influences success?**

- Reports
- Required documentation fields
- Visual reminders on eMar
- Online suggestion box
- Weekly issues meeting
- Weekly update emails
- Hardware

## Contributing Influencing Factors

**Contributing Influencing Factors**

- Training/education
- Cultural Change
- Workflow Process Change
- -Point of Care Documentation
- -Real Time Documentation

## Turnaround time for clinicians’ 	suggested 	changes

- Education issues
- 	“I’ve been to the VA, I  know how to 	document  electronically”
- Periodic upgrades

**Issues**

## “I would not want to work in a hospital that does not have electronic documentation”

- “I have never been so organized so early in my shift”
- “If I had known there was going to be a downtime this weekend I would not have volunteered to work”

**Summary**
# Presentation: 801601

## Development of an analyzer for size and charge characterization of nano-particles for research and education Malay K. Mazumder, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, DMR 0526977

**Development of an analyzer for size and charge characterization of nano-particles ****for research and education**** Malay K. Mazumder, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, DMR 0526977**

**Research Goal:** Our goal is to develop a laser based instrument for research and education in the area of transport and deposition of airborne nano-particles.

**Recipient Institution and Research Personnel:**
-  University of Arkansas at Little Rock,
-  Malay K Mazumder,
-  Jing Zhang,
-  Praveen K Srirama
-  Rajesh Sharma

**Principle of Operation:** The basic principle of the analyzer is to measure the phase difference between the particle motion under the influence of an external field (acoustic/electric) and the oscillation of the external field at a certain frequency. The phase lag is related to the size of the particle. The amplitude of particle oscillation with respect to the oscillatory ac excitation field is related to the charge on the particle.

**Phase Lag and Amplitude Ratio Measurements**

**Accomplishments:**
-  Simultaneous and Synchronous operation of AC Electric and Acoustic fields to measure both charged and uncharged particles in real-time.
** **Testing of the analyzer under low pressure conditions for measurement of lower size particles.

- Fig. 1: Particle Oscillation with the application of acoustic/electric fields

- Fig. 2: Motion of a suspended particle driven by an external sinusoidal electric/acoustic field.

- Fig. 3: Experimental Setup for simultaneous measurement of size and charge of particles

- Fig. 4: Phase lag variation as a function of particle diameter and excitation frequency of 1 kHz at 7mb and at normal pressure (1013 mb).

- Fig. 5: Typical 3D plot showing the size and charge distribution of particles

- Microphone

- AC Electrode

- Fringes
# Presentation: 273317

## Summary reportof EIC Detector DesignWorking group

## Overview of session

- Welcome and orientation
- Rear detection systems and luminosity measurements at H1 and ZEUS
- Constraints on the H1/ZEUS interaction regions from the HERA luminosity upgrade
- Forward physics and detection systems at H1 and ZEUS
- e/h separation and means of Particle ID
- Particle ID at Belle
- EIC detector studies
- Silicon tracking for the PHENIX upgrade
- Discussion

- N. Saito
- U. Schneekloth
- U. Schneekloth
- H. Kowalski
- D. Milstead
- T. Iijima
- J. Chwastowski
- Y. Goto
- B. Surrow
# Presentation: 487599

## PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDY

- PARS

## AUTHORITY -RESPONSIBILITY

- PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY ACT (PWSA)  P.L. 95-474; 33 U.S.C. 1223
- SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION
- “Designate necessary fairways and traffic separation schemes” to  “provide safe access routes ... to and from ports or other places... United States.”
- Delegated to the Coast Guard

## REQUIREMENTS

- REQUIRED WHEN WE CONSIDER 		NECESSITY FOR FAIRWAYS OR 		TRAFFIC SEPARATION SCHEME(S) (TSS)
- OPTIONAL FOR OTHER ROUTING 	MEASURES
- RECOMMENDED ROUTES
- ANCHORAGE/NO ANCHORAGE AREA
- ATBA

## HISTORY

- FIRST STUDY INITIATED 1979
- ENTIRE COAST
- 32 ORIGINAL STUDY AREAS
- COMPLETED BY 1982
- SOME AREAS RESTUDIED

## OBJECTIVES

- DEFINE NEED
- TRAFFIC DENSITY (Present and future)
- FORM/TYPE OF MEASURE
- EXISTING MEASURE: STILL NEEDED?
- MANDATORY USE FOR CERTAIN   		CLASSES OF VESSELS

## INITIAL REVIEW

- REVIEW ORIGINAL AND 				SUBSEQUENT STUDIES
- DETERMINE IF CONDITIONS HAVE 		CHANGED TO WARRANT NEW 		STUDY

## STUDY ITSELF

- IDENTIFY STUDY AREA
- NOTICE OF STUDY IN FED REG
- GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION OF AREA
- EXPLANATION OF CONTEMPLATED ACTIONS AND IMPACTS
- INVITE PUBLIC COMMENT
- PRESENT ISSUES AND QUESTIONS

## STUDY ITSELF (CON’T)

- COLLECT DATA
- VESSEL TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
- FISHING (COMMERCIAL/TRIBAL)
- REC BOATING TRAFFIC
- DOD ACTIVITIES
- OCS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
- ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
- DREDGING PROJECTS
- ECONOMIC IMPACT

## STUDY ITSELF (CON’T)

- CONSULTATIONS
- VARIOUS FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES
- MARITIME COMMUNITY
- PORT AND HARBOR AUTH/ASSOC
- LOCAL CITIZEN GROUPS
- ANALYZE DATA
- RECOMMEND ROUTING MEASURE(S)

## STUDY COMPLETE

- SUBMIT TO G-MWV
- HQ PUBLISHES NOTICE OF STUDY RESULTS IN FED REG
- HQ REVIEWS RECOMMENDED MEASURES AND DETERMINES IF:
- FEDERAL RULEMAKING REQUIRED
- IMO MEASURE REQUIRED
- BOTH

## PARS TO REDUCE VESSEL STRIKES OF NORTH ATLANTIC RIGHT WHALES

- COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 2004
- USCG SHALL COOPERATE WITH NOAA TO ANALYZE POTENTIAL ROUTING MEASURES
- PROVIDE FINAL REPORT TO CONGRESS WITHIN 18 MONTHS

## TIMELINE

- CG & MTA ENACTED AUG 9, 2004
- NOTICE OF STUDY (PARS) PUBLISHED IN FEDERAL REGISTER FEB 18, 2005
- COMMENT PERIOD WILL CLOSE     APR 19, 2005
- COMPLETION DATE SEP 2005
-  REPORT TO CONGRESS JAN 2006

## GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

- NORTHERN REGION:  Cape Cod Bay; the area off Race Point at the Northern end of Cape Cod and the Great South Channel
- SOUTHERN REGION: 31o27’N - 81oW - 29o45’N – shoreline.  Includes Ports of Jacksonville and Fernandina, FL and Brunswick, GA

## ACTIONS

- REVIEW COMMENTS
- REVIEW PREVIOUS PARS
- REVIEW EXISTING/PREVIOUS STUDIES
- MEET WITH NOAA/NMFS AS NECESSARY

## ACTIONS (CON’T)

- DRAFT REPORT
- SUBMIT REPORT TO CONGRESS
- PUBLISH NOTICE OF STUDY RESULTS IN FEDERAL REGISTER

## POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATIONS

- IMPLEMENT VESSEL ROUTING MEASURES PER NMFS ANPRM
- CREATE NEW VESSEL ROUTING MEASURES OTHER THAN THOSE PROPOSED
- VALIDATE EXISTING MEASURES – NO CHANGES
- CHANGES TO EXISITING MEASURES

## FINAL ACTIONS IF REQUIRED

- RULEMAKINGS
- IMO MEASURES
- BOTH
# Presentation: 939487

## PM2.5 FRM vs. Continuous: One site, many numbers

**Header Text**

**PM2.5 FRM vs. Continuous: One site, many numbers**

- Hamilton County Department of Environmental Services
- Cincinnati, Ohio

## If all the continuous PM2.5 analyzers were in the same location, would the data between and among analyzers be comparable? Ideally the same? 

## Slide 3

## Objectives

- All sampling same air mass
- Daily sampling of FRM PM2.5
- All continuous agree within 10% of one another
- All continuous agree with the FRM within 10%
- All inlets at same height
- Inlets are minimum 1 meter apart

## Operating Parameters

- Installed the Very Sharp Cut Cyclone
- All continuous PM2.5 analyzers & FRM
- Monthly Flow Checks
- TEOM – with filter change as needed
- Quarterly Independent Flow Audits
- Ohio EPA

## EquipmentContinuous PM2.5 Analyzers

- Thermo Sharp 5030  v1.4
- Thermo TEOM with FDMS 1400 AB
- Met One BAM 1020 v2.55
- SMART Heater set: 35%
- FRM
- Thermo Andersen RAAS PM2.5 FRM

## Slide 7

## Top view of platform

- RASSPM10 low vol

- RASS FRM

- Met One

- TEOMFDMS

- ThermoSHARP

**Top view of platform**

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Data

- Study began March 1, 2007
- Valid data: 23-25 hours
- Overall:
- Agreement widely variable on a daily basis and not inherent to one analyzer
- Ranges of difference: -39 to 108%
- Agreement better or rather less variability on a monthly average comparison
- All independent flow audits within 2.0%

## Daily Variability

## Continuous vs. Continuous

## Monthly Average Variability

## Slide 15

## Candidate Method Analysis

|  |
| --- |

|  |
| --- |

## Candidate Method Analysis

## Conclusion

- Each instrument does not agree consistently within 10% of one another in any combination
- Data on a daily basis  is  more variable – greater fluctuation between instruments
- Better agreement between the TEOM and the SHARP than between either and the BAM.
- In this study, BAM tends to run higher than any of the other continuous and FRM.
- However, better agreement is displayed at other locations with BAM and FRM. Difference is the SMART heater setting – data is more FRM like.

## FUTURE

- Adjust the SMART Heater setting on BAM
- Continuing to run the 3 analyzers side by side
- Will move 2 units to other areas of network for 2009 monitoring season
- Additional data analysis with full year’s data
- Data analysis of Tisch Dichot units

## Thanks to.....

- Monitoring & Analysis Staff of Hamilton County Department of Environmental Services
- Technical Services Staff, Ohio EPA
**Additional Information:**
- Anna Kelley
- (513)946-7725
- _[Anna.Kelley@Hamilton-co.org](mailto:Anna.Kelley@Hamilton-co.org)_

## Slide 21

## Slide 22
# Presentation: 048370

## “Who was that masked man?”

- Computer Registration

## Node Registration Facts

- You must register your computer to use the network.
- There are two types of registration:
- Temporary for visitors ( 4 days or less ).
- Permanent for regular network use.
- Visitors register & get on the network fast!
- 90% of the registrations take < 3 minutes...
- You must fill out the permanent registration form after 4 days of temporary registration

## Temporary Registration is Simple!

- Power on your computer.
- Open a web browser.
- Fill in the form.
- Reboot.

*   ***TIP:***  Instead of rebooting you can release and renew your DHCP address.*

## Temporary Registration Form

**  ****Required Information**

- Name
- E-mail
- A way to contact you

## Temporary Registration Address Grant

- Provides full onsite & offsite network access:
- But it expires at midnight!
- Re-registration is required each day for a maximum of 5 days.
- For permanent access you must fill out Miscomp Node Registration Form
- All of your hardware addresses must be registered...

## Permanent Registration

- System name
- System administrator
- Hardware information
- Location
- All Ethernet hardware “MAC” addresses
- This is the 12 digit, hexadecimal unique identifier for each of your network interfaces.
- A laptop might have three MAC addresses:
- wireless, wired, and a docking station.

-   To permanently register your machine, the  following information is required:

## Frequently Asked Questions

- The Miscomp Node Registration form and other valuable information can be found in the DHCP Registration FAQ.

**http://fndcg0.fnal.gov/dhcp-faq.htm**
# Presentation: 372550

## Ulysses Observations of  Cross-field Diffusion Flow of Solar Energetic Particles at High Latitudes

- Although the Bastille Day 2000 event was associated with a large X5 flare at 22oN, large fluxes of solar energetic particles arrived at Ulysses (62oS, ~3 AU) within a few hours following the event on the sun. Measurements of flow direction of ~40-90 MeV protons by the COSPIN HET on Ulysses show that for most of the time after the onset the flows were large but not aligned with the magnetic field direction. In fact, for much of the time, especially late in the particle event, the flow were approximately 90o away from what was expected for flow along the magnetic field. Model calculations indicate that there was a significant cross-field diffusion flow, which became dominant late in the event. The observation suggests solar energetic particles can easily diffuse across the magnetic field lines in the inner heliosphere.

- By Ming Zhang

- Particle flows at Ulysses (62oS 3 AU) During the Bastilles Day Event of 2000

- Color Plot
# Presentation: 535074

## PHENIX Status

## Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary ProofFirst Store on Saturday

## PHENIX Integrated Luminosity

**As of this morning:**
**Recorded Ldt = 2.89 pb ****–1**** (goal was 4.0 pb-1)**
**But more important is Figure of Merit P****2****L **
**FOM = 0.85 pb ****-1**** ( goal was 1.0 pb-1 assuming avg. polarization = 50%)**
**Expect FOM = 0.9 pb****-1**** by the end of the day**

**PHENIX has recorded**
**0.305 pb-1 since Saturday**

## Progress During Our One Week Hiatus

## HBD Prototype was Installed in the PHENIX IR on April 18

-   **Connected to PHENIX gas system supplying high purity CF****4**** (levels  dropped to ~ 15 ppm O****2**** and 20 ppm   H****2****0 shortly after installation).**
**  ****Measure QE with flash lamp & determined that photocathode is in good condition.**
** ****Gas gain agrees with what was**
**measured at Stony Brook and has been stable since installation.**

- Many thanks to the PHENIX Tech Crew for a
- job well done !

## First HBD Signals of Detector with Beam

**Positive bias mode:  **
**Sensitive to charged particles + Cherenkov light**

**Negative bias mode :**
**Sensitive mainly to Cherenkov light **
**(charged particle signal expected ~ 1.3 e’s****)**

**55****Fe calibration inside IR : Detector gain ~ 9 x 10****3**

**We see strong hadron suppression **
**(******** Hadron Blindness) and good indication of Cherenkov light**
- More to Come !

**Single channel readout  (awaiting final readout electronics)**

**55****Fe **
# Presentation: 696442

## Definitive molecular electronic structure Z. Gan and R.J. HarrisonComputational Chemical Sciences GroupComputer Science and Mathematics Division(harrisonrj@ornl.gov)

**Full-configuration interaction *****exactly***** solves the N-electron problem in a given 1-electron basis**
**It provides a critical benchmark for understanding and calibrating many-body calculations**
**Developed several new parallel-vector algorithms each of optimal for certain parameter values**
**Optimal algorithms for Cray differ sharply from those for IBM**
**The new code already enables computations 40+x larger and 100+x faster than previous work**
**3.4 TFLOP/s sustained speed on 432 MSP (62% peak) **

## Timing and performance results of FCI benchmark calculation of C2 ground state using 432 MSPs of Cray-X1a,b,c).

|   | Timing (sec. per iter.) | Performance |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beta-beta | 62 | 8.5 GFlops/MSP |
| Alpha-beta | 167 | 8.8 GFlops/MSP |
| Load Imbalance | 9 | 0 |
| Vector Symm. | 11 | ~0 |
| Total | 249 | ~8.0 GFlops/MSP |
| Disk IOd) | 1780 (read) - 122(write) | 293MB/s (read) - 246MB/s (write) |

- a) C-C bond length takes the experimental value 1.2425 Å. The cc-pVTZ basis set, plus diffuse *s *(α=.04402) and *p *(α=.03569) functions, is employed. The FCI calculation involves 8 electrons in 68 orbitals, resulting 64,931,348,928 determinant space under D2h symmetry.
- b) FCI energy is computed based on RHF oribital. The *1s* orbitals of carbon are frozen. The final FCI energy is -75.7854195035 Hartree.
- c) Maximum 432 MSPs could be requested under queue system. The sustained aggregated performance on 432MSPs exceeds 3.4Tflops, about 62% machine’s peak performance.
- d) Disk I/O is only performed once at the end of CI calculation, and it is not counted for the purpose of flop rate. For restarted calculations the CI vector on disk is read into memory as the initial guess.

## Parallel scalability of FCI Oxygen anion calculations on Cray-X1. 

**Parallel scalability of FCI Oxygen anion calculations on Cray-X1**.

**Detailed Timing data of FCI Oxygen anion ground state calculation on Cray-X1**** ****a,b)**

| Timing (sec/iter) | 128 MSPs | 192 MSPs | 256 MSPs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| T_beta-beta | 67 | 45 | 35 |
| T_alpha-alpha | 35 | 24 | 19 |
| T_alpha-beta | 242 | 162 | 123 |
| T_iter | 344 | 231 | 177 |

**Aug-cc-pVQZ basis set was employed. FCI calculation is based on ROHF orbitals.**
**The *****1s***** orbital is frozen in FCI calculation. The final FCI(7,79) calculation on Oxygen doublets includes 14,851,999,576 determinants in *****D******2h***** symmetry.**
# Presentation: 400893

## Alan M. Parker
President and 
Chief Executive Officer

Rocky Flats Environmental
 Technology Site 

*President and *
*Chief Executive Officer*
*Rocky Flats Environmental*
* **Technology Site *

- Alan Parker is president and chief executive officer of Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC, responsible to the corporate board of managers for all aspects of the company’s operations and profitability. Kaiser-Hill is an independent company equally owned by Kaiser Group International, Inc., and CH2M HILL. The company’s purpose is to act as the general contractor to safely execute the operations, cleanup and closure of the Department of Energy’s Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site.
- Mr. Parker returned to Rocky Flats after serving as executive vice president for CH2M HILL Hanford Group for the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection Project. He was named Kaiser-Hill’s executive vice president and chief operating officer for a short time until he assumed his current position.
- Before leaving Rocky Flats for Hanford, he served as vice president of Closure Project Integration at Rocky Flats, managing environmental restoration, waste, and deactivation and decommissioning.  In this role, he managed the demolition of Building 779, the first major plutonium building to be demolished in the Department of Energy complex; the remediation of six of the top 10 highest risk environmental sites; and the first shipments of transuranic waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico.
- Mr. Parker has 23 years of project management experience in international and domestic projects and a broad background in waste management and environmental engineering. He holds a bachelor of science degree in engineering and has completed master’s level studies in nuclear waste management.
- Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC, is a Department of Energy-owned Superfund cleanup site and former nuclear weapons production facility. The Rocky Flats mission includes special nuclear material stabilization; decontamination, deactivation and decommissioning; waste management; environmental cleanup; and site closure.
- 0801
# Presentation: 835996

## Results of measurements 2 pair of different samples. About 200 degree phase shift at less than 0.2 dB power absorption.

## 25 mm thick sample calculations. Red line parallel bias, green line anti-parallel. Bias 1400 Gs.

## F=1266 MHz. Parallel Bias.

- F=1292 MHz. Parallel Bias.

- F=1266 MHz. Anti-parallel Bias.

## Samples 3&4. Green line parallel bias 1727 Gs, red line 2120 Gs.

- Transverse resonances.

- 2120 Gs

- 1727 Gs

## Insertion of the gap distorts field distribution in ferrite. As a result we have normal component of E-field in short side wall of the waveguide. In small air gaps this field amplifies =14 times. So should be no air gaps there.

**Gap 2 mm, F=1300 MHz, bias 1400 Gs.**

**Gap 0 mm, F=1300 MHz, bias 1400 Gs.**

**Gap 1-4 mm, F=1300 MHz, bias 1400 Gs.**

- Insertion of the gap distorts field distribution in ferrite. As a result we have normal component of E-field in short side wall of the waveguide. In small air gaps this field amplifies =14 times. So should be no air gaps there.

## E-fields in Emax cut-plane.

- E-fields in ferrite tip cut-plane.

- E-fields in ferrite tips too small to cause a problem.
# Presentation: 699690

## Antiproton Production

**Keith Gollwitzer**
**Antiproton Source Department**
**Accelerator Division**
**Fermilab**
** **
**10  December  2007**

## Lots of Work Done & Tuning

- Re-arrangement of Accumulator A10 straight components
- New beam tube for Debuncher Extraction Kicker
- Power balance and re-set trip limits of TWTs of all of the stochastic cooling systems
- Removal of AP2 ion chamber
- Stochastic cooling equalizers
- Recovery of higher gradient lens and put back into operation
- Accumulator cooling systems able to handle flux of 2.2s stacking cycle
- Mechanics of transfers out of Accumulator

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Accumulator Stack Record 270.01mA

## One Shift of beam > 8e12 Protons on Target

## Slide 7

## Best Hour !!!!  24.37mA in 1 hour

- _Best Hour !!!!  24.37mA in 1 hour_

## M:TOR109 (Protons on Target)

- A:STCKRT (stacking rate for super cycle in mA/hr)

- Dec 06

- Mar 07

- Jul 07

- Dec 07

- 32
- 28
- 24
- 20
- 16
- 12
-  0

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**10mm low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

**Old low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

## M:TOR109 (Protons on Target)

- A:STCKRT (stacking rate for super cycle in mA/hr)

- Dec 06

- Mar 07

- Jul 07

- Dec 07

- 32
- 28
- 24
- 20
- 16
- 12
-  0

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**10mm low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

**Old low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

## M:TOR109 (Protons on Target)

- A:STCKRT (stacking rate for super cycle in mA/hr)

- Dec 06

- Mar 07

- Jul 07

- Dec 07

- 32
- 28
- 24
- 20
- 16
- 12
-  0

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**10mm low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

**Old low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

## M:TOR109 (Protons on Target)

- A:STCKRT (stacking rate for super cycle in mA/hr)

- Dec 06

- Mar 07

- Jul 07

- Dec 07

- 32
- 28
- 24
- 20
- 16
- 12
-  0

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**8e12**

**10mm low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

**Old low gradient**

**10mm high gradient**

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Summary

- The Antiproton Source is running well
- Outlook is promising
- Recent Records
- 270.01mA in Accumulator
- 24.37mA in 1 hour
# Presentation: 740819

## Slide 1

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

**	****	**

***      ***
**Interactive Filing**

**Voice:****      ****1-800-549-0595**
**	****             ****1-877-715-4433**
**Fax:****           ****301-457-1159**
**E-mail:****      ****www.ASKAES@census.gov**
**               **
**Web Sites:****  ****www.customs.treas.gov/AES**
**                      ****www.aesdirect.gov**** **
**	****	****          ****www.census.gov/foreign-trade **
**Mail:****	****AES Branch**
**            ****Bureau of the Census**
**            ****Foreign Trade Division**
**            ****Room 3133, Building 3**
**            ****Washington, DC 20233**

**Notes:**
The AES team can reached by 
	Telephone:  1-800-549-0595
	Fax: 301-457-1159
	E-mail: www.FTDASKAES@ccmail.census.gov
	Internet: www.customs.treas.gov/AES
	                www.aesdirect.gov
	Mail:  AES Branch
	           Bureau of the Census
	           Foreign Trade Division
	           Room 2176, Building 3
	           Washington, DC 20020

The AES website has the technical specifications needed to program your system, a list of certified AES software vendors, AES error list, etc.
# Presentation: 537369

## Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering  (1 of 4)

**33-h FCST valid 21Z 25 July 2006 ****(near mid-afternoon maximum temperatures – day 2)**

## Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering  (2 of 4)

**48-h FCST valid 12Z 26 July 2006 ****(near early morning minimum temperatures – day 2)**

**Parallel Run**

**Operational BMJ**

## Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering  (3 of 4)

**Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering **** (3 of 4)**

**48-h FCST valid 12Z 26 July 2006 ****(near early morning minimum temperatures – day 2)**

**Parallel Run**

**Operational BMJ**

## Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering  (4 of 4)

**Day 2 examples showing direct impact of changes in convective triggering **** (4 of 4)**

**48-h FCST valid 12Z 26 July 2006 ****(near early morning minimum temperatures – day 2)**

**Parallel Run**

**Operational BMJ**

**Plenty of high (low pressure) clouds in both runs, ****mostly in the form of grid-scale (ice) clouds**
**Noticeable shifts in cloud patterns in parallel run**
**Much less total cloudiness in parallel at 12Z; reduce high bias in model cloudiness out west**
# Presentation: 806069

## Thermal Cycling Tests of Dummy Modules

- Setup
- Pre-cycling resistance measurements
- IZM module results
- Alenia module underway

## Setup

- Modules built with CERN Flex V.2 and bare dummy module.
- Used Ecobond glue under MCC, pigtail bonding field, and 4 corners.
- Modules used for FE wirebonding tests prior to thermal cycling
- First cycled modules unconstrained, then attached to sector using CGL and UV-cure tacks on 4 corners.
- Cycled 21oC to –35oC in environmental chamber.
- Monitored module temperature and chain resistance in real time

## Setup (cont.)

- 

- 

- Only 4 columns monitored in real time during cycling

- All columns measured on probe station before and after

## Column Resistances (before cycling)

**IZM**

**Alenia**

**Bad chip**

## IZM Module results

- No change after 2 cycles of unconstrained module
- No change **DURING** 19 cycles of module on sector
- _Open columns_ detected **AFTER** overnight storage at 21oC

- RED = location of open column
- 32/270 columns failed

- On bad chip, all columns were open prior to tests & chip fell off after removing module from sector. Solder bumps left 1⁄2 on chip 1⁄2 on sensor.

## Possible Explanation

- Results are consistent with differential movement of dummy chips and dummy sensor.
- For example, assume sensor doesn’t move under cooldown(probably not correct, just example), then contraction of each chip is about (2.5x10-6) x(either 3.7 or 5.5x103 microns)x56=0.5-0.8 microns.
- Worst case is corners of chip, but we only measure columns.
- Approximate strain is (0.5-0.8)/(20) or 2.5-3.8%.. Solder stress vs strain becomes non-linear for strains above about 1%.
- Creep rupture is possible explanation for failure after sitting.

- UV Tack

- UV Tack

- Carbon-carbon on sector

- CGL

## Alenia Module Tests Underway

- 3 Cycles to –35o unconstrained
- 3 Cycles to –35o mounted on sector
- Time at –35o 30-40 minutes/cycle
- Let sit for a day
- No failures yet
- Tests continuing
# Presentation: 767501

## Law Enforcement  and ITSHow ITS can support  your mission 

**International Association of Chiefs of Police**
**Midyear Conference – **
**Division of State and Provincial Police**
**Christine M. Johnson**

## Highway Congestion

**Highway Congestion**

- It’s getting worse!

## Our Relationship is very important

**Our Relationship is very important**

**For every 1 minute of clearance -- traffic backs up for 4 or 5 minutes!**
**And you are trying to get first and second responders through this mess!**

## Preferred Improvements

**Preferred Improvements**

***Percentage of “Great Help” responses shown***

**Notes:**
Operations  Q14:  How much do you think the following would help to overcome the problems that you experience?
It is very  interesting to note that when we asked citizens what should we do about congestion or where should we spend our transportation dollar,  their answers showed a remarkable sophistication :  
        First was “get in, get out and stay out” response; construct and repair roads so they last – and when you repair do it as rapidly as possible even if you have to shut down the road
        Second  work on your operations:  traffic signals, incident response time
Then,  consider adding new lanes 

## By working together, and sharing information...

**By working together, and sharing information...**

**We each accomplish our mission better**

## Public Safety Initiative

**Vision**
- Detect faster
- Right response
- Manage Scene better
- Better medical care
- Get traffic moving
-     faster

## Public Safety Conference 

**Conclusion**
- Demonstrate
- better collaboration
- integration of technology
- Get the word out on federal funding
**So...what are we doing?**

## New York City –Integrated Incident Management System  

## Slide 9

## Automatic Crash Notification

- Request for Proposals - April
- Demonstrate link to 911

## R.F.P -- Integrating CAD Systems

## Earmarks

- Several Public Safety Projects in 2000
**Washington DC  Metro Area**
**Iowa**
**Hoosier  SAFE-T**

## Training

- Scene Clearance

**Incident Management  Course**

**Notes:**
Insert Stats on Training here

## New Guidelines

**National Fire & Incident Management Consortium**

**Traffic**** ****Incidents**

## Sounds Good

**Sounds Good**
**Where’s the Money****?**

## TEA-21 makes ITS Public Safety Eligible

- Better communications  between 1st and 2nd responders may  buy more “capacity” than other traditional alternatives

**TEA-21 makes ITS Public Safety Eligible**

**And ITS Deployment Funds**

## Requirements

**Requirements**

**Architecture Consistency**

**What information are we going to share between agencies?**

## Transportation is  the Circulation System of our Communities
# Presentation: 268660

## Sampling Fluctuations and Their Contribution to Hadron Energy Resolution

- A. Para, February 20, 2007

## Motivation

- Homogenous calorimeter with dual readout (Cherenkov + ionization) offers a prospect of high resolution hadron calorimetry.
- Natural implementation of a dual readout concept: two-component calorimeter (for example lead glass/scintillator).  In such a calorimeter both components are sampled, hence undergo sampling fluctuations
- The target energy resolution is very good,  hence the contribution of sampling fluctuations must be well understood.

## Goal

- Develop a phenomenological model of contribution of sampling fluctuations to the  hadron energy resolution as a function of the  detector geometry: sampling frequency (absorber thickness)  and the active detector thickness.

## Method

- Use a sample of 10 GeV pion-induced showers simulated in a large calorimeter with 10,000 layers of 1 mm thick lead glass. By convenient grouping of thin layers one can effectively simulate the sampling calorimeter with different thicknesses of ‘absorber’ (i.e. inactive) and ‘active’ materials.
- Analyze the ionization energy deposits only. The energy resolution is dominated by non-compensated effects of nuclear energy loss. Remove these effects by studying the resolution defined as the RMS of:

## 	Energy Resolution (10 GeV) as a Function of Absorber Thickness

- 	Energy Resolution (10 GeV) as a Function of Absorber Thickness

- Expectation: E/E ~ √tabs, hence plot (E/E)2 as a function of tabs
- (E/E)2 is not a straight line, but straight line is a decent approximation
- But the slope of the straight line depends on the thickness of the active layer
- Sampling fraction (ratio of active to absorber) is not the only relevant variable. Compare (1,1), (20,20) and (100,100) configuarations

## Strategy

- The previous plot is too busy to analyze. Try to find an effective description in three steps:
- Fit (E/E)2 as a quadratic function of tabs (green line in the forthcoming plots)
- Parameterize the coefficients (constant, linear and quadratic term) as a quadratic function of the tact (or 1/tact)
- Parameterize (red line in the forthcoming plots):
-  (E/E)2(tabs,tact) = A(tact)tabs2 + B(tact)tabs +C(tact)
- Note: the above ansatz is a crude guess. Fitting separate coefficients is not a good recipe, as they are usually correlated. It may not work very well. Better approximations can be found.

## Active layers 1 – 8 mm

## Active layers 10 – 40 mm

## Active layers 60 - 100 mm

- ‘Global’ fit not a very good description for very thick active layers (deficiency of the coefficients parameterization)

## Fitting the Coefficients 

- Fitting the Coefficients

## Sampling Fluctuations as a Function of the Absorber Layer

- (E/E)2 ‘almost linear’ in tabs
- But the slope (resolution) grows very rapidly for thin active layers
# Presentation: 709484

## EMERGENCY SERVICES

**CURRICULUM PROJECT OVERVIEW**
**- 2002 NESA -**

- Developed as part of the National Emergency Services Curriculum Project

## ES Curriculum Project

- Establish standards for CAP ES Specialty Qualifications
- Avoid inter-wing mission and transfer problems
- Avoid re-inventing the wheel
- Get down to doing the training sooner than preparing to do the training

## What is being developed?

- Task Guides
- PowerPoint Slides
- Reference Text Materials
- Tests & Quizzes
- Train The Trainer  & Orientation Programs
- Administrator’s References

## How will materials be made available to the field?

- Primarily via the WWW
- Also via CD-Roms to Wings, and printed materials as necessary
- 	Flexibility to update the training materials quickly is necessary to keep up with rapidly changing missions and is an integral part of the project.

## Three Phases

- Ground Team & Introductory Training
- Mission Base Staff
- Air Operations

## Project Timeline

- Phase One (Ground Team & Intro Training)
- Package Development: Dec 97 - Oct 98
- Package Field Testing: Nov 98 - Nov 00
- Field Implementation Began: May 2001
- Phase Two (Mission Base Staff Training)
- Package Development: Nov 98 - Sep 01
- Package Field Testing: Oct 01 - Dec 02
- Field Implementation Begins: March 2003

## Project Timeline Continued

- Phase Three (Aircrew & Flightline Training)
- Package Development: Jul 00 - Jul 01
- Package Field Testing: Jul 01 - Mar 03
- Field Implementation Begins: May 2003
- This timeline is subject to change.
- Changes and updates are available at our web site:
- _[http://www.](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[capnhq](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[.](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[gov](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[/](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[nhq](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[/do/](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[dop](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[/escp1.](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)__[htm](http://www.capnhq.gov/nhq/do/dop/escp1.htm)_

## HQ CAP/DOS Contact Info.

- John Desmarais, HQ CAP/DOS
- Phone: 334-953-4228
- E-mail: _[jdesmarais@capnhq.gov](mailto:jdesmarais@capnhq.gov)_
- Joe Curry, HQ CAP/DOSP
- Phone: 334-953-4905
- Shared E-mail: _[dos@capnhq.gov](mailto:dos@capnhq.gov)_
- Shared Fax: 334-953-4242 or 334-953-6342

## QUESTIONS?
# Presentation: 804452

## Potential Extension of HIPAA to HIE Organizations

- By Victoria M. Prescott, JD
- Representing Regenstrief Institute
- Indianapolis, IN

- Presented  at the American Health Information Community’s Confidentiality, Privacy & Security Workgroup Meeting – June 22, 2007

## Agenda 

- Overview of Indiana Network for Patient Care
- Discussion of proposal to extend HIPAA to HIE organizations

## Indiana Network for Patient Care 

- INPC is a virtual health information exchange
- Formed in 1996 through a standard contract called the INPC Participation Agreement
- Establishes categories for reuse of data:
- Treatment
- Research
- Public Health
- Healthcare Operations (e.g., quality)
- Management Committee for some decisions

## INPC Legal Structure

- Regenstrief (administrator of INPC) is a business associate of the covered entities that provide data to INPC for several purposes:
- De-identifying data for research
- Transmitting reportable diseases to public health authorities
- Disclosing to providers for treatment
- Aggregating data for quality reporting
- Regenstrief is merely the custodian

## INPC Legal Structure

- INPC participants must ensure their privacy policies covers the INPC uses of the data
- Regenstrief does _not_ deal with the patients because the INPC covered entities want to maintain that direct nexus w/patient
- Therefore, Regenstrief:
- Does not have a privacy policy
- Refers any patient request to the covered entity
- INPC participants have agreed to consult with Regenstrief if contemplating granting patient request to ensure technical feasibility

## INPC Scope

- INPC is the largest and oldest HIE in nation
- Data includes: labs, radiology, transcription, EKG, pathology, medication history, claims...
- INPC participants include hospital systems, large practices, several commercial payers
- Others contributing data for INPC use include Indiana Medicaid, RxHub, private labs, and state and local health departments
- INPC currently covers central Indiana which has 1.6MM people (25% of state)
- > 95 data feeds coming in
- Receive > 5,000,000 messages per month

## Questions for Today

- Recommendation to AHIC for HIPAA-like civil and criminal penalties to apply
- HIPAA Provisions:
- Privacy notice
- Individual rights (e.g., access, amend, restrict, accounting for disclosures)
- Public policy disclosures
- Security Rule – already complying
- Carve out for governmental agencies
- Challenges in defining HIE

## Thank youQuestions?

- Victoria M. Prescott, JD
- Representing Regenstrief Institute
- Tel: (317) 402-0340
- Email: vprescott@vprescott.com
# Presentation: 733780

## Pry had errors in processing GPS COSMIC data; pryc corrected errors

***500 hPa heights slightly better in GSI hybrid in NH (.012 anomaly correlation dy 5), slightly worse in SH (.004 anomaly correlation day 5) ***
***rms vector wind error in pry at 200 and 850 hPa in tropics reduced; large improvement in 850 hPa tropical winds ***
***GSI hybrid precip over continental US slightly more skill than operational***
***GSI hybrid analysed tropical winds closer to radiosondes; forecast tropospheric winds closer to radiosondes than operational***
***Bias, rms vector error of 200 hPa winds over East Asia substantially reduced in GSI hybrid***
***GSI analysed and forecast extratropical temperatures closer to radiosondes than operational, analysed tropical temperatures further from radiosondes, stratospheric temperatures closer to radiosondes***
***forecast heights fit radiosondes significantly better  in GSI hybrid***
*** ******GSI hybrid analysed moisture closer to radiosondes***

## 500 hpa height anomaly correlations

***Nov.1 2006-Feb. 05 2007***

***Tropical rms vector wind error***

|  | op | pry | pryc |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NH day 5 | .863 | .874 | .875 |
| Day 8 | .602 | .623 | .628 |
| SH day 5 | .816 | .809 | .812 |
| Day 8 | .520 | .498 | .504 |

|  | op | pry | pryc |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 200 day 1 | 4.58 | 4.42 | 4.36 |
| Day 3 | 7.56 | 7.50 | 7.44 |
| 850 day 1 | 2.36 | 1.84 | 1.83 |
| Day3 | 3.53 | 3.01 | 2.99 |

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Precipitation skill CONUS

|  | op | Pry | pryc |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12-36 hr bias | 1.54 | 1.58 | 1.58 |
| ETS | .37 | .36 | .36 |
| 36-60 hr bias | 1.60 | 1.62 | 1.61 |
| ETS | .33 | .33 | .34 |
| 60-84 hr bias | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.63 |
| ETS | .29 | .30 | .30 |

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

## Slide 28
# Presentation: 933741

## LBNL2

- LB1 All Samples
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- LB2 All Samples
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- LB3 All Samples
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- All Samples Averaged
- Median Centered by Standards, Time, or LB then Combined
- Heatmap

## LBNL2

- U0126 Treatment All Samples All Time Intervals
- Median Centered by Time then Combined
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- LB1-LB3 Averaged Samples
- Median Centered Separately by LB then Combined
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- LB1-LB3 Averaged Samples Fold Difference over Control
- Median Centered Separately by LB then Combined
- Heatmap

## LBNL2

- Time Course Averaged Samples
- Median Centered Separately by Time then Combined
- Pearson Correlation

## LBNL2

- Time Course Averaged Samples Fold Difference over Control
- Median Centered Separately by Time then Combined
- Heatmap
# Presentation: 729183

## GPRA:  New Climate Observations Introduced

-      FY2005 Target: 1014 new ocean observing platforms deployed and reporting;
-      Aug 2005:  963 total ocean observing platforms (relative to total FY04 deployments); 467 ARGO floats

- Aug. 05

**B**

## GPRA:  Reduce the Error in Global Measurements of Sea Surface Temperature

-      FY05 target: 0.5 °C; Long-term Target: Error of 0.2 °C by 2008
-      Long-term measure:  annual targets, progress reported quarterly

- More rapid expansion of the in situ network over the next several years will minimize the satellite bias error, enabling more accurate global sea surface temperature from a combination of satellite and in situ measurements.

- Note: this measure is proposed as a new GPRA for FY2006; it is already reported on quarterly

- Satellite bias error: the systematic difference between satellite-derived vs. in situ measurements of sea surface temperature

- Jun. 05

**B**
# Presentation: 857389

## Beams Week in Review

- Still Starting up
- working towards pre-shutdown luminosity
- Uncorrelated failures

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Store Summary

| Store # | Initial Luminosity | Duration | Termination | comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1434 | 1.64 E30 | 7.6 hours | intentional | Large emittance/beam loss, lost pbar shots |
| 1443 | 5.14 E30 | 14.67 | intentional | Lost pbar shots
Reduced proton intensity |
| 1448 | 6.45 E30 | 4.83 | quench at A3 | 1-hour proton lifetime, low proton  intensity |

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Summary

- F4 Wet engine off much of Monday
- Luminosity limited by
- large emittances
- beam loss during acceleration
- HV703 load transfer switch
- Angle bump to open up F0 aperture
- Coupling

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Summary

- Core cooling equalizers in design
- Next week?
- 40% improvement in cooling rate now
- 125% improvement with equalizers
- Improved Core and AP3 emittances

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Summary

- Running okay
- Flying wire/multiwire issues
- Q847/MI8 lattice
- HV703 load transfer switch
- 8 GeV coalescing

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- Five shifts of  Tevatron studies to restore luminosity
- Possible access
- Coupling
- Injection
- Lifetime
- Aperture

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- Pbar studies
- Unstacking lattice
- Beam line matching with new lattice
- Parasitic
- MI8 line/Q847
- Recycler protons
- MiniBooNe

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- All Experimenters Meeting
# Presentation: 146973

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- Why did the City install a Screen?

- September 13, 2006
- David Brown
- Water/Irrigation Division Manager

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- Water Treatment Plant and Intake Structure built in 1969 – 1970
- Moved to present location from Oak Flats
- Plant put on line in 1972
- Idea was that water supply for the WTP would be from PP&L’s Wapatox Canal
- Town of Naches Waste Water Effluent would be bypassed
- Fish and debris screening done at Wapatox Canal diversion

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- As the issue of returning fish surfaced
-  John Easterbrook was instrumental in the installation of upstream barriers

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- The City’s WTP diversion was not addressed during Phase 1 of the BPA Screening
- Wapatox had installed state of the art screens

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- Bureau of Reclamation and PP&L started conservations about shutting down the Wapatox
- Looked like the canal would be down during the winter months
- The City would need fish screens as water would no longer be screened by Wapatox

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- The City applied to BPA for funds
- BPA grant for partial funding
- The City applied to SRFB for funding
- SRFB made small grant
- Total Project cost $1,838,430
- $1,124,000 from BPA
- $300,000 from SRFB
- $414,430 from City funds

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- Main Structure built by a contractor
- Chuck Lenberg and crew built and installed the screens and upstream barriers

## Before

## Screen

## Screen

## Screen

## Upstream Migrant Barrier

## Automatic Air Burst Backwash

## Automatic Air Burst Backwash

## Level Control

## Issues

- Mud Behind Screens
- Long way to run vacuum truck, but doable
- Algal build up on screens in summer
- Thought we could hand clean twice a year. Before Wapatox turns on and after they shut down
- This year with the HOT we have had to hand clean about twice a month
- Takes about an hour

## Issues

- Slush Ice

## Naches River Water Treatment Plant Screen Project

- Why did the City install a Screen?

- September 13, 2006
- David Brown
- Water/Irrigation Division Manager

- Tour this afternoon
- Questions?