# Presentation: 757086

## eAuthentication Initiative 
FY 04 Agency Funding Discussion

eGovernment Program

**FY 04 Agency Funding Discussion**
- eGovernment Program

## Agenda

**eAuthentication FY 04 Agency Funding Model**
**FY 04 **_***Fixed Costs***_** Funding Models**
**Agency Variable Costs**
**Questions and Answers**

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

##        eAuthentication FY 04 Agency Funding Model 

***USDA’ s enterprise authentication service costs are based on:***
***fixed costs; and***
*** ******integration costs at the time of integration***
***	***

_***Variable Cost Factors:***_
***Complexity of Application Authentication***
***Number of URLs to be protected***
***Most Simple eAuth Integrations ************ $10,800***
***Most Complex eAuth Integrations ************ $74,400***
***Cost determined in “Design” phase of Integration Lifecycle***

_***Fixed Cost Components:***_
***H/W & S/W Operations and Maintenance ***
***Registration Tools and Processes***
***User Administration ***
***Role assignment tools***
***Integration with the government-wide eAuthentication services***

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

## FY 04 Potential Fixed Cost Funding Models 

**Three Potential **_***Fixed Cost***_** Funding Models are presented for consideration. **
**FY 2004 fixed costs are $5,031,667.**
**Based on Number of Agency Forms (Interactions)****(FY 2003 model)**
**Based on Number of Respondents for Interactions**** **
**Based on FTEs/IT Budgets**

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

##               Fixed Costs – Model 1  “Number of Agency Forms (Interactions)”

**              ****Fixed Costs – Model 1  ****“Number of Agency Forms (Interactions)”**

**Fixed vs Variable Costs for future**
**years not yet determined**

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

**          ****Fixed Costs – Model 2****“Number of Respondents for Interactions”**

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

**       ****Fixed Costs – Model 3****“Blend of FTEs/IT Budgets”**

***Model 3, the Agency FTEs/IT Budget Model, uses an equal percentage (50%50%) calculation from the FTE agency % distribution and IT Budget agency % distribution...  This is the method for calculating the Presidential Initiatives shares and similar to the Greenbook funding...***
***	***

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

**       ****Fixed Costs Comparisons Among the 3 Models **

**Notes:**
High energy Welcome.

Get jazzed.  

Good things are happening:

	EITIRB meeting tomorrow for 30 minutes exclusively on 	eGov

	EC and I will be meeting with DS ideally this week as well 	but may slip to next week

	Relatively positive feedback from OMB based on our 	efforts – only Yellow

Thanks for efforts to date.  Time to roll up sleeves again.

## Agency Variable Cost

**Hosting Site – **influences network/firewall/IDS/ACL complexity
**Enforcer Agent – **IIS and Apache are simple; others are not
**# of Policy/URL’s – **influences complexity of building/testing/implementing
**Access Control & Admin. – **influences the complexity of building/maintaining
**Access Control Redirect Response – **customized for users, but takes more time
**LRAs – **Existing “trained” LRA’s _*or*_  New “yet to be trained” LRA’s?
***Process: ***
***eAuthentication Technical Services team determines Costs in “Design” Phase of eAuthentication Integration Lifecycle***
***OCIO presents Integration Costs to Agency Decision Maker***
***Agency transfers funds to OCIO***

**Agency Variable Cost**

## Agency Variable Cost

## Decisions Needed

**Select a fixed cost model that best distributes costs across all agencies.**
**Immediately transfer funding to support the operational service.**
**All available funding for the service has been expended; we are in danger of turning the service off.**
**Identify all new applications to be integrated in FY 2004 and plan for funding the variable cost component of the integration effort.**

## Questions and Answers