BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 809703

## Engineering Team Support for the Roadmap Committee

- Mary DiJoseph	GSFC
- Tim VanSant	GSFC
- Ron Muller	GFSC/QSS
- Pete Cline	GSFC
- Regan Howard	GSFC
- Gregg Marr	GSFC
- Neil Murphy	JPL
- Juan Ayon	JPL
- Janine Daughters JPL

## Engineering Team Support for Roadmap mission studies

- Study schedules support the Roadmap schedule

- Complete innovative mission conceptual designs proposed by mission advocates
- Support the SSSC Roadmap Committee via the mission advocates
- Ensure realistic mission cost estimates
- Identify and incorporate new enabling technologies

- Engineering team Goals

- Critical to quality mission design
- Focal point for mission (and liason to Roadmap Committee)
- Frequent interaction with engineering team is essential
-    -Ensures that the engineering team captures the science    objectives correctly
-    -Can create insights that result in innovative and creative alternative concepts

- Mission Advocate’s Role

- Mission characteristics that drive technology and cost
-    -High data rate instruments (drive power and communication
-    -Complex orbits requiring intensive real-time operations
-    -Interplanetary orbits requiring nuclear power
-    -Formation flying
- Technology enables missions
-    -Advanced power, communications and propulsion technologies can enable missions not previously possible

- Technology Role

## Roadmap study process and outputs

- Identify Mission advocate

- Roadmap Committee Selection

- Science team

- Engineering Team

- Define Payload

- Orbit Design

- Spacecraft Conceptual Design

- Refine Science Objectives

- Study duration

*Note:  frequent interaction between the science and engineering teams is critical to quality mission design*

- Complete mission design

- Preliminary concept report to committee (redirection as necessary)

| Instrument | Mass (kg) | Power (w) | Data Rate (bps) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Magnetometer | 0.6 | 5.0 | 431 |
| Plasma Composition | 2.6 | 3.0 | 1360 |
| Fast Plasma | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1071 |
| Energetic Particles | 0.9 | 1.3 | 521 |
| Cosmic Ray Telescope | 1.0 | 0.8 | 200 |
| WAVES | 2.5 | 2.3 | 579 |
| White Light Coronagraph | 10.0 | 6.5 | 1200 |
| Heliospheric Imager | 5.5 | 10.0 | 1192 |
| Doppler Magnetometer | 7.0 | 10.0 | 1200 |
| X-ray Spectrometer | 1.5 | 2.5 | 273 |
| TOTAL* | 33.2 | 42.2 | 8027 |

- Study process

- Sample instrument summary

- Other outputs
-   - Mission conceptual design
-   - Mission Quad charts
-   - Technical options, enhancements and significant trades
-   - Issues and cost drivers
# Presentation: 775473

## BUILDING COMMISSIONINGANDPROPER DUCTS

## A Definition of Commissioning

- "...the process of ensuring that building systems are designed, installed, functionally tested, and capable of being operated and maintained according to the owner's operational needs."
- - Oregon Office of Energy

## Maintaining Intelligence

- a stand-in presentation of the South Mountain Company's approach to Commissioning New Homes

- USDOE National Workshop on State Building Energy Codes
- Burlington, VT      July 18, 2001

## Buildings that are easy to love

- buildings that last are the ones that are loved
- comfortable
- practical
- easy to maintain and modify

## Sustainable Design and Construction

- energy efficiency
- recycled and most-appropriate products
- Owner's Manuals and Roughing Books

## Owner's Manual:standard for cars: why not homes?

- welcoming letter
- list of project participants, subcontractors, recommended on-going maintenance relationships
- building data and chronology
- size, dates, blower door results, water quality tests, etc.
- operations and maintenance instructions
- permits and regulatory info
- site plans and recommendations
- appliance manuals

## Roughing Book

- provides "perfect memory and X-ray vision"
- permanent photographic record of hidden elements
- systematic photo tour of the house
- site is cleaned
- after all mechanicals and blocking are complete
- prior to insulation and wallboard
- every wall and ceiling
- photos are keyed back to plans
- 60-200 photos
- approximately $100 materials plus 4-6 hours labor

## Roughing Book Uses

- locate lost or covered elements
- pinpoint repairs
- aids in alteration/additions

## "Commissioning" Documents

## The "Roughing Book"

## After...
# Presentation: 144285

## MIT MRSEC IRG-I: Fabrics that can see the light Michael F. Rubner DMR-0213282 

- The integration of conductors, insulators, and semiconductors is essential for creating modern functional electronic and optoelectronic devices, such as transistors, photodetectors, LED’s, etc. These are typically produced using a variety of elaborate wafer-based processes that allow for small features but are restricted in terms of coverage area. In contrast, the technique of fiber drawing from a preformed reel or tube is simpler and yields extended lengths of highly uniform fibers with excellent optical transmission characteristics. So far, however, this technique was only possible for a very restricted class of materials. Recently, MIT MRSEC professors Joannopoulos and Fink succeeded in the design, fabrication and characterization of the first optoelectronic fiber that integrates conducting, insulating and semiconducting materials (Bayindir et al., Nature 431, 826-829, 2004). They were able to demonstrate a tunable photodetecting device fiber that is sensitive to illumination across its entire length and can also identify the precise location of an illuminating spot. Such fibers can be woven into a patch of fabric as shown at the bottom panel of the figure below. Using this approach, it is possible to create a new class of fabric based chemical/biochemical sensors that may impact growing homeland security needs.

- Top: scanning transmission microscope images of an integrated photodetecting-device fiber consisting of conductor (Sn), insulator (PES), and semiconductor (As2Se3) components.
- Bottom: a spectrometric fabric created by weaving such fibers.
# Presentation: 799074

## Get It Right:Back to Basic Principles

- Professor Christopher Yukins
- October 2004

**Notes:**
Good Morning, 
Below is a copy of the agenda for our October 27 "Get It Right" seminar.  Each speaker will have 15 minutes to present, followed by a question and answer session. Mr. Drabkin will be serving as the moderator for this event. Please send me a copy of your presentation no later than Friday, October 22. 
10:00-10:05- Gloria Sochon/Lyle Eesley (Welcome) 10:05-10:10- Karl Reichelt (Opening remarks) 10:10-10:25- David Drabkin 10:25-10:40- Domenic Cipicchio 10:40-10:55- Roger Waldron 10:55-11:10- Mary Davie 11:10-11:25- Chris Yukins 11:25-11:55- Questions and Answers 11:55-12:00- David Drabkin (Closing remarks) 
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 
Thank you, 
Jamie Ready 
(202) 219-3454 Monday-Wednesday (703) 558-4092 Thursday/Friday Jamie_ready@sra.com 

## Core Problems

- Lack of Competition

- Lack of Transparency

- Focus on Efficiency

- Revenue-Driven
- Business Model

## Get It Right:  PossibleOptions

## Rethinking Business Plan:What Is GSA Selling?

## Accountability Issues

**GSA Contracting Officer**

**Contractor**

**Customer Agency**

## Quality

**Quality**

**Price**

**Special**
**Reqts**

**Let’s Be Clear on What the GSA Schedules Can -- and Cannot -- Ensure**

## Where Is GSA Contracting Heading: A New Paradigm

**Full &**
**Open**
**Competition**

**Multiple-**
**Award**
**IDIQs**

**GSA Schedules:**
**Lists of**
**Qualified**
**Suppliers?**

## “Get It Right.  Get It Here.  Excellence in Acquisition”

- “Get It Right.  Get It Here.  Excellence in Acquisition”

## ConclusionChristopher R. YukinsTel. 202-994-9992cyukins@law.gwu.edu
# Presentation: 737095

## Rear Legs/Rear View for Brown Swiss and Guernsey Breeds

## Scoring

**Generally scored 1 to 50 (low to high)**
**BS has scored on scale of 1 to 9**
**Higher is generally better, but not too extreme**
**1 is scored when legs are severely hocked in and toed out**

## Scoring cont.

**30 (or 6 for BS) is moderate hocking in with possible slight toe out**
**40 (or 8 for BS) is close to optimum with legs tracking straight, but not directly perpendicular to ground, no hock in or out, no toe in or out**

## Scoring cont.

**50 is severely straight legs that are perpendicular to ground, legs may be hocked out with toes in**

## Data

**7 unknown parent groups with four birth years included**

| Breed | Records | Cows | Herds | Pedigrees | Sires with >5 daus |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BS | 7,522 | 6,896 | 375 | 21,060 | 833 |
| GU | 4,666 | 4,223 | 209 | 18,832 | 596 |

## Calculation of Evaluations

**Run in 2 steps:**
**First: Evaluate final score & 15 linear traits with current system **
**Second: Evaluate RLRV.  Use only records with RLRV in 17-trait system**
**Allows use of correlated trait information but requirement for gross estimation not necessary**
**No heterogeneous variance adjustments**
**Only RLRV evaluations retained**

## Standard deviation of RLRV 

| Breed | SD |
| --- | --- |
| BS | 5.57 |
| GU | 7.28 |

## Highest estimated genetic correlations of linear type traits with RLRV

| Trait | BS | GU |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Strength | 0.54 | 0.36 |
| Dairy form | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| Thurl width | 0.38 | 0.30 |
| Rear udder width | 0.58 | 0.52 |
| Rear udder height | 0.08 | 0.46 |

## Lowest estimated genetic correlations of linear type traits with RLRV

| Trait | BS | GU |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rear legs side view | -0.17 | -0.46 |
| Udder depth | 0.04 | -0.19 |
| Udder cleft | -0.08 | 0.08 |
| Rump angle | -0.03 | 0.16 |
| Teat length | 0.03 | -0.10 |

## Heritability for RLRV, average difference and maximum difference from previously estimated heritabilities 

|  | BS | GU |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Heritability | 0.073 | 0.050 |
| Ave diff | -0.048 | -0.053 |
| Max diff | -0.108 | -0.179 |
| Trait w/ max | Front teat placement | Rump angle |

## Statistics from evaluations of cows

| Breed | Cows |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | BS | GU |
| Number | 4,878 | 3,964 |
| Reliability | 27.0 | 29.2 |
| RLRV | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| Low | -1.1 | -1.5 |
| High | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| SD | 0.29 | 0.37 |

## Statistics from evaluations of bulls with 5 or more daughters 

| Breed | Bulls with >5 daus |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | BS | GU |
| Number | 196 | 183 |
| Daughters | 20.4 | 18.0 |
| Herd | 12.8 | 10.1 |
| Reliability | 44.1 | 43.6 |
| RLRV | -0.20 | 0.04 |
| Low | -1.1 | -1.2 |
| High | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| SD | 0.38 | 0.44 |

## Further Research

**Investigate inclusion in feet and legs composite**
**Check impact on Net Merit**
# Presentation: 815791

## Using Measurement Data to Improve Quality

**Joseph Anarella, M.P.H.**
**Assistant Director**
**Bureau of Quality Management and Outcome Research****Office of Managed Care****New York Department of Health**
**Albany, NY**

- Anarella

- 1

## New York Medicaid Managed Care

- Completed six year phase of 1115 waiver
- 31 plans serving 2.1 million enrollees
- Enrollment ranges 200 - 180,000
- Primary Care Case Management (PCCM) program in upstate rural counties

- Anarella

- 2

## Enrollment History – Medicaid Managed Care

- Anarella

- 3

**Enrollment History – Medicaid Managed Care**

** ****January 2001 to December 2003**

## Tools We Use to Measure Quality

- Anarella

- 4

***QUALITY***

*Encounter Data*

*HEDIS*

*Clinical*
*Studies*

*Satisfaction*
*Surveys*

*Provider*
*Network Data*

*Annual Onsite*
*Review*

*Complaints *

*CAHPS*

## How We Use CAHPS Data

- Feedback to plans for quality improvement (QI) purposes
- Quality Incentive – plans can earn up to 1% in additional premium
- Public Reporting (www.health.state.ny.us)
- Quality Matrix
- Autoassignment Algorithm (future use)

- Anarella

- 5

## Quality Improvement Matrix

- Anarella

- 6

*-*

- +

- 0

- Trend

- 

-  0

- 

- A	Performance is notable.  No action plan required
- B, C	No action plan required
- D, F	Root cause analysis and action plan required

- Statewide Significance

## Effects of Using CAHPS

- Anarella

- 7

- Upward movement across key measures
- Increased interest to improve satisfaction scores
- Health plan staff identifies programs where we use CAHPS to improve performance

## To Learn More

- Anarella

- 8

- _[www.health.state.ny.us](http://www.health.state.ny.us/)_
- Joseph Anarella: 518-486-9012 _jpa02@health.state.ny.us_
# Presentation: 199295

## Public ForumRedesigned FCC Application Filing for Required Notifications (NT) and Requests for Extension of Time (EX)December 14, 2006

- Presented By:
- Dorothy Stifflemire,
- Associate Division Chief
- Spectrum Management and Resource Technology
- FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

**FCC Universal Licensing System**

## Agenda

- Introduction
- Benefits of the NT/EX Redesign
- Online Demonstration
- Questions

## Introduction

- The NT/EX application filings in the Universal Licensing System are being redesigned using current technologies and design concepts.  These filings will be integrated into the ULS License Manager for both the FCC Form 601 (Notification or Extension of Construction) and the FCC Form 603 (Notification or Extension of Consummation).
- The NT/EX redesign will improve customer service by improving the filing process and increasing data integrity.

## Benefits of the NT/EX Redesign

- Ease of Use
- Usability and Enhanced 508 Accessibility
- Streamlined look and feel with ULS License Manager
- More robust system that can handle large numbers of call signs

## 
Filing Required Notifications for Construction and Consummation

Filing Requests for Extension of Time for Construction and Consummation

- Filing Required Notifications for Construction and Consummation
- Filing Requests for Extension of Time for Construction and Consummation

**Online Demo**

## Questions and Answers

- Remote attendees may send questions or suggestions at
- _[http://](http://esupport.fcc.gov/fccevents/reports/submitmsg.jsp)__[esupport.fcc.gov/fccevents/reports/submitmsg.jsp](http://esupport.fcc.gov/fccevents/reports/submitmsg.jsp)_.
- This Inbox will be available until December 28, 2006 at 5:00 p.m.
- Please include your Name, Organization, Address, and Telephone Number when filling in the form.
- Questions and concerns after this date may be directed to the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 202-414-1255). Select Option #2, Forms or Licensing Assistance.  Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays).  To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded.
# Presentation: 787416

## Potential Generation Resources in

**Potential Generation Resources in**
**BC, Alberta,Washington Montana & Wyoming**
**that could be developed by 2020**

- Northern Hydro
- 2,000 MW

- Fort McMurray
- 3,500 MW

- Lake Wabamun Coal
- 2,000 MW

- Southern Wind
- 1,000 MW

- Site C
- Hydro
- 900 MW

- Coastal Wind
- and Hydro
- 5,000 MW

- Wind
- 1450 MW

- NW  Wa
- Gas
- 1,250 MW

- Mica/Revelstoke
- Hydro
- 2000 MW

- Coal and Wind
- 1,500 MW

- Coal and Wind
- 3,900 MW

- SE Coal
- 1,000 MW

- Eastern WA/Ore
- 2000-5000 MW
- Gas and Wind
# Presentation: 438034

## Slide 1

## Status:  Needs to be investigated further

**Priority Rating:  High**
_**Issue:**_**  Reproductive efficiency limits profitability **
_**Explanation:**_**  Lifetime reproductive efficiency focusing on uterine health/embryonal and fetal survival, and assisted reproduction technologies including germplasm conservation should be emphasized.**

## Status:  Needs to be investigated further

**Priority Rating:  High**
_**Issue:**_**  Characterize genetic variation among breeds, animals within breeds, and alleles in distinct production environments **
_**Explanation:**_**  This characterization should emphasize fitness traits, lifetime productivity, meat and wool quality, and disease and parasite resistance/tolerance.**

## Status:  Needs to be investigated further

**Priority Rating:  High**
_**Issue:**_**  Suboptimal nutrient intake, utilization, and partitioning limits all aspects of production; nutrition is the largest cost factor in production**
_**Explanation:**_**  This should include elements from previous action plan, including grazing behavior, rumen microbiology.**
# Presentation: 697696

##    US COMMERCIAL SERVICE

- Greeting & Introduction of US CS
*Mr.* *Greg O**’Connor, Commercial Counselor*
- Recent Stage of Health Care Reforms
*Mr. **Marek Šnajdr, **1**st** Deputy Minister, Ministry of Health*
- Developments in setting price & reimbursement
*Mr. Josef **Suchopár, CEO, Infopharm*
- Introduction of NGO: Chráněná dílna sv. Prokop u červeného javoru
- & Mental Power Prague Film Festival (_http://mentalpower.cz_)
*Mr. **Patrik Henel **& Mr. David **Sychra*
- Reception

**   ****US COMMERCIAL SERVICE**
** ****WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME YOU AT   **
** ****HEALTH CARE SEMINAR & COCKTAIL  **

## US CS ROLE

- List of activities available on www.buyusa.gov/czechrepublic

**US CS ROLE**

## US CS AT MEDICA

***IFP Program***: Medica 2008 will be on line in early November
- www.buyusa.gov/ifp

## US CS – CONTACTS 

- Tržiště 15, 118 01 Praha 1, Czech Republic
- Tel: +420 257 022 437, Fax: +420 257 022 810
- _www.buyusa.gov/czechrepublic _
***Mr. Greg O******’******Connor, ***
***Commercial Counselor***
- _Greg.O’Connor@mail.doc.gov _
***Ms. Veronika****** Nov******áková,***
***Commercial Specialist, Health Care sector***
- _Veronika.Novakova@mail.doc.gov_

**US CS – CONTACTS **
# Presentation: 719081

## Application Guidelines

**Application Guidelines**

- Claudia Thompson
- Program Administrator
*Superfund Basic Research Program*

**US Department of Health and Human Services**
**National Institutes of Health**
**National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences **

**SBRP Applicant Information Meeting **
**October 29, 2003**
- Research Triangle Park
- North Carolina

## The Guidelines

-  Introduction
-  Application Procedures
-  	A. PHS 398
-  	B. Submission Instructions
- 	C. Definitions
-  	D. Pre-application consultation
-  	E. General Instructions
-  	F. Specific Instructions
-  Review Procedures
-  Policies and Assurances
-  Staff Consultation

- Quick Run Through

- Beth and Susan

- Janice

- Quick Run
- Through

## Introduction

- Requirements:
- At least 3 biomedical projects
- At least 1 non-biomedical project
- Administrative Core
- Research Translation Core
- Research Support Core
- Highly recommended:
- Community Outreach Core
- Training Core

## Restrictions

***Caps****:*
- Direct Costs:	$2.1M
- Community Outreach: 	$100K
- Training Core: 	6% of total

- Total number of research projects and cores: 12

## Application Procedures

- Supplemental information to allow for multiple projects/cores
- B.   Submission Instructions
- C.   Definitions
- Pre-Application Consultations
- Letter of Intent
- E.   General Instructions

**Application Procedures**
# Presentation: 396663

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis SoftwareSteve Snowden & Kip Kuntz

**Publicly Released 5 April 2006**
**XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software**
**	****	****Suite of Fortran 77 programs and Perl scripts **
**EPIC Instruments (MOS for now)**
**Particle Background Modeling**
**	****	****Position Dependent Background Spectra**
**	****	****Particle background images**
**Creates exposure corrected, background subtracted, and adaptively smoothed images**
**Manual/Cookbook and spectral/imaging examples including suggested treatment for other background components**
**Future extensions**
**	****	****Mosaicking  of multiple observations**
**	****	****Extension to PN data**

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Tool to process and filter data sets to remove obvious soft proton flaring.
- A1795 Observation

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Tool to create quiescent particle background spectra.
- A1795, Model Particle Background, and Filter Wheel Closed Spectra.  The difference between the observed and background spectra at high energies is residual soft proton contamination.

- Filter wheel closed spectrum

- Red: Abell 1975 spectrum
- Green: Model particle background
-             spectrum

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- The quiescent particle background is significant at higher energies even for bright and hard sources.
- A1795 Spectrum

- Fitted background subtracted
- spectrum

- Same fit as above but without the
- background subtracted from the data

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Other background components can also be significant over various energy ranges.
- A1795 Spectrum at the 5-7 arc minute annulus.

- Black: Data and Full Model
- Red: Cluster Emission
- Dark Blue: SXRB emission
- Green: Instrumental Lines
- Light Blue: Soft Proton

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Different observatories and different methods, and different results.
- A1795 XMM-Newton and Chandra Spectra.

- Green: Chandra results from
-           Vikhlinin et al. 2005
- Blue: XMM-Newton results from
-           Nevalainen et al. 2005
- Red: XMM-ESAS

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Background subtracted, exposure corrected, and
- Adaptively smoothed image of Abell 1795 in the 0.35-1.25 keV band.

## XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software 

- Prototype mosaicking of Coma Cluster observations.
- The data have been background subtracted, exposure corrected, normalized between adjacent pointings, and adaptively smoothed.

## XMM-Newton Background ModelingExample: SWCX

**Hubble Deep Field North GT Observations – 4 Observations Over 16 Days**
**Fitted Background-Subtracted Spectra**

## XMM-Newton Background ModelingExample: SWCX

**Hubble Deep Field North GT Observations**
**Folded Spectra**
# Presentation: 003354

## Nano-Micro Morphological Understanding of Nanofiber-Nanotube Reinforced Polymer Composites

**Karen Lozano, University of Texas Pan American, DMR 0606224**

_**Research:**_  The proposed experiment-based study focuses on the interplay between the nano- and micro-morphology of nanofiber and nanotube reinforced polymer composites. Studies are being conducted to elucidate how the interactions between the NF or NT and polymer matrix account for morphological changes therefore affecting specific macro- properties.

**TGA on PP-VGCNFs (nitrogen)**

**Model of PP-VGCNFs interface**

- An estimation of the interface of PP/NF composites was obtained using simple TGA analysis.** **The external layer (soft layer), of
- t ≈ 200 nm confines most PP molecules in interaction with the NFs.  This interaction is responsible for the increased thermal stability,
- and is represented by the wrapping of macromolecular chains around NFs. The core layer is rigid and has a t ≈10 nm.

## Nano-Micro Morphological Understanding of Nanofiber-Nanotube Reinforced Polymer Composites

_**Outreach:**_  Dr. Lozano established Sci & Tech Apprentices to expose children (4-18 yrs of age) to engineering at an early age.  To this end, more than 200 students have benefited from the hands-on engineering activities (>85% Hispanics). In addition, Dr. Lozano mentored a group of four 4th graders (all Hispanics) in their project presented to the Toshiba/NSTA Exploravision Award Competition, these kids won first place competing among 17,000 students from USA and Canada. They won a $10,000 savings bonds (one for each one) and an all expense trip to Washington DC for the award ceremony for them and their families.

**Nano-Micro Morphological Understanding of Nanofiber-Nanotube Reinforced Polymer Composites**
**Karen Lozano, University of Texas Pan American, DMR 0606224**

- Discovery School, Edinburg, TX. Back row, left to right: Karen Lozano (Mentor), Raquel Duberney-Guerrero (Coach), Isabella Soto (Student), Adam Tabak (Student); Front row, left to right: Bianca Mujica (Student), Jorge Vidal (Student), Mark Fowler (Toshiba)

**D.A.P.E.S. (Diabetes Assistance and Prevention E-System)**
- Implants a nanosensor in a tooth to analyze harmful food intake for adolescent diabetics. The nanosensor continuously monitors and provides information such as sugar levels to a portable electronic system via wireless communication and warns or rewards children according to their consumption patterns.
- _[View winning web site](http://dev.nsta.org/evwebs/2573/)_
# Presentation: 414576

## EPICS support for ControlLogix via EtherNet/IP

- Kay-Uwe Kasemir, LANL
- May 2001

## Allen-Bradley ControlLogix

- SNS: HPRF, Vac., RCCS, Facility, ...
- Up to 7MB, multithreaded, ...
- Symbolic ‘tag’ names, no ‘I10:12’
- Accepts DeviceNet, ControlNet, EtherNet/IP, ... like any I/O module

- IP = Industrial Protocol
- Evolved from “ControlNet over EtherNet” SIG
- Encapsulates CIP in TCP & UDP
- (Ctrl. & Info. Protocol, shared by DeviceNet and ControlNet)
- Specs. used to be part of ControlNet,now available as separate “EtherNet/IP”:
- Open DeviceNet Vendor Assoc.,http://www.odva.org

## EtherNet/IP Spec. Details

- Open portion of CIP (object & service codes):
- How to route messages
- How to read serial number and vendor code
- Vendor specific:
- Get data of real interest, e.g. PLC values
- This driver:CIP Read/WriteData as used byAllen Bradley ControlLogix PLCs
- Round-trip request/response mechanism
- Subscription (ForwardOpen) with triggered updates via UDP not implemented/documented by AllenBradley

## EPICS Driver/Device

- No special hardware, neither for setup nor runtime
- IOCs (pc486, PPC), command-line (Win32, Unix)
- Can read & write any tag on PLC
- Records: ai, ao, bi, bo, mbbi, mbbo, mbbiDirect, mbboDirect
- DTYP=“EtherIP”,   INP=“@plc1 PS1RB2”
- also: INP=“@plc2 arraytag[21]”, “@plc2 struct.elem”
- REAL, INT, DINT, BOOL,scalars, struct. elements, arrays
- no need to “publish” tag in PLC’s LadderLogicor program ControlNet connection to allocate bandwidth
- INP/OUT can be changed at runtime to use different tag on different PLC!
- Handles disconnects/reconnects (e.g. PLC reboot)

## Driver/Device Details

- One communication thread per PLC
- Combines requests to minimize transfers
- (up to ~500 byte PLC buffer limit)
- Arrays are transferred as a whole (default)
- Output records:
-  Monitors PLC, updates rec. on change
- Supports SCAN=I/O Event (also for e.g. 30Hz scans)
- Provides statistics:min/max/last scan times, #errors, ...
- Performance: (default “System Overhead Time Slice”)
- Single REAL tag: 11ms (7ms with 50% SOTS)
- BOOL[352] + 3xREAL[30]:      15ms + 25ms (combined requests)

## Transfer Time Histogram

- 352 BI @ 10Hz, 3 x REAL[40] @ 2 Hz

## Conclusion

- Setup:
- No additional hardware (neither for PC, IOC, nor communication setup)
- Use:
- No special LadderLogic required, though arrays might be preferred (performance)
- Good IOC support (I/O Event, runtime change)
- Performance:
- 11ms/transfer, susceptible to network delays
- good enough for most applications?
# Presentation: 333454

## From the Inside of the Sun to Its Atmosphere

- Thomas J. Bogdan
- National Center for Atmospheric Research

- SH52A-01: 17 December 2004

## Magnetic Activity Cycle

## Irradiance Cycle

## Clue to Something Deeper?

## Why Does One Care?

## Need more proof?

**Notes:**
Mention:
	visits to Maryland and Howard Universities
	participation at the AGU Career Center
Subsequent employment:
	three: faculty positions
	four: NCAR scientist positions
	three: scientist positions at other national labs
Bjorn Stevens: winner of AMS Meisinger award; Waterman nominee
Tom Hamill: PECASE award at NOAA

## Magnetic Flux Emergence

## Active or Ephemeral?

## A Superficial Process?

## Or One With Deeper Roots?

## Some Easy Maths...

*x**** **t* = *x** *(*** x**-****  **x** *)

*F*     = *** x**-****  **x** *       as *x * 
*** **4* = *** x**-****  **x** *       as *x * 0+

- *T* = *2**X**  *

- 1   =*  **X** ** *      as *X * 
- *4* =* **X** *       as *X * 0+

-  = 1 + *X*

*X*

## Let Emerging Flux Help...

- *T* = *2**X**  *

- 1   =*  **X** ** *      as *X * 
- *4* =* **X** *       as *X * 0+

- 

*X*

- as *T * 

- Steady Transport
- Sinusoidal Modulation

## A Curious Implication

- SCZ has not thermally relaxed
- Poles on average cooler than active latitutdes
- Upwelling of entrained high entropy fluid persists after the active region’s magnetic demise
- During the Maunder Minimum the rapid transport by emerging flux was suppressed

## Outlook

- New data + Advances in numerical simulations = Demise for contrived and antiquated thinking

*“**Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but NOT to their own facts.”*
*Attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan*

*“**When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”*
# Presentation: 110684

## WILMER, TEXAS

- September 23, 2005

## Introduction

## Introduction

- Parties to investigation
- Parties to public hearing
- Sequence of events
- Safety issues

## Parties to Investigation

- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- Texas Department of Transportation
- Texas Department of Public Safety
- Dallas County Sheriff’s Department

## Parties to Investigation

- Motor Coach Industries, Inc.
- ArvinMeritor, Inc.
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.

## Parties to Public Hearing

- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Texas Department of Public Safety
- Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance
- Motor Coach Industries, Inc.

## Parties to Public Hearing

- ArvinMeritor, Inc.
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.
- Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc.
- United Motorcoach Association
- American Bus Association

## Hurricane Rita Preparations

- September 21, 2005, mayor of Galveston orders evacuation
- Texas Governor urges evacuation of coastal areas

## Hurricane Rita Preparations

- Brighton Gardens vehicles insufficient for long trips
- Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc., called BusBank to arrange transportation
- BusBank contracted with Global Limo for 2 motorcoaches
- Bellaire-to-Dallas trip expected to take 4 hours

## Evacuation Trip

- Driver departed Pharr, Texas, at 5:00 a.m., arrived in Bellaire at 11:00 a.m.
- Motorcoach loaded with 37 Sunrise residents, 6 nursing staff, and 1 nursing staff parent
- 22 wheelchairs, 5 walkers, and 18 medical oxygen cylinders loaded
- Motorcoach departed about 3:00 p.m.

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Sequence of Events

- 6:05 a.m.
- Motorcoach stops on right shoulder near Mars Road exit
- Fire in right-rear wheel discovered
- Nursing staff assisted passengers off motorcoach
- 6:07 a.m., 911 call

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## 06:30

**06:30**

- Source: KTVT News

## Source: Dallas County Sheriff’s Dept.

## Safety Issues

- Manufacturer maintenance information on wheel bearing components
- Fire resistance of motorcoach materials and designs
- Emergency egress from motorcoaches
- FMCSA’s ineffective compliance review program
- Transportation of partially pressurized aluminum cylinders

## Slide 21
# Presentation: 681642

## Overview of Chlamydia Screening in HEDIS® March 2002Sarah Shih

**Overview of ****Chlamydia Screening ****in HEDIS****®** March 2002Sarah Shih

## Background

- New measure in HEDIS 2000
- Developed in response to need
- Pilot tests published
**Mangione-Smith R et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154(11):1108-1113.**

## Chlamydia Screening

- Denominator
- Females ages 16 - 26 years old, identified as sexually active through diagnostic or procedural codes
- Numerator
- For the Denominator population, lab tests for Chlamydia identified by Administrative Data Sources

## Chlamydia Screening

- Reported in two age cohorts
- 16 - 20 years
- 21 - 26 years
- Collected by plans
- Medicaid
- Commercial

## National Rates

## National Rates

## Regional Variation 2001

## Other HEDIS measures

- Breast Cancer Screening
- Cervical Cancer Screening
- Prenatal and Postpartum Care

## Other HEDIS measures

## Other HEDIS measures

## Other HEDIS measures

## Other HEDIS measures

## Thoughts for the Future

- Quality Improvement Activities
- Accreditation requirements
- State of Managed Care Quality Report
- www.ncqa.org
# Presentation: 494327

## Internet Assisted Review

- Focus Group
- April 25, 2002

## Agenda

- Comments on PIN Letter or Registration URL email
- User Agreement
- Read Phase for Reviewer Sample Screen
- Read Phase for SRA/GTA Sample Screen
- Validate Read Phase Requirements
- Discuss Streamlining

## User Agreement

**User Agreement**
- By acceptance of this User Name and Password I agree to safeguard the security of IAR data.  This information is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 (PL93-579).  In addition, I agree to the following:
- 1.       I will not disclose my User Name and Password to anyone;
- 2.       My User Name and Password are considered the equivalent of my legal signature;
- 3.       I will not attempt to learn another user's User Name and Password or access information in the system by using a User Name and Password other than my own;
- 4.       I will only access information for which I have a demonstrable need to know based on my official duties;
- 5.       If I have reason to believe that the confidentiality of my User Name and Password has been broken, I will contact the eRA Helpdesk at 1-866-504-9552 immediately so that the suspect User Name and Password can be deleted and a new one assigned to me;
- 6.       My User Name and Password will be deleted from the IAR system when I no longer require access for work-related activities;
- 7.       I will log off terminals when I am not actively using them to protect them against unauthorized access.
- 8.       If I knowingly fail to comply with any of the above requirements, I may be subject to disciplinary action.  Reissuance of a User Name and Password to me after violation of any of the above statements will be dependent on review by appropriate IAR officials.

- Read Phase
*Reviewer Views*

## READ PHASE FOR REVIEWER: Showing COI and Blocked

## READ PHASE FOR REVIEWER: Showing all applications (assigned and unassigned)

## View Critiques

- Read Phase
*SRA/GTA Views*

- READ PHASE FOR SRA/GTA BY APPLICATION

## READ PHASE FOR SRA/GTA BY REVIEWER

## Validate Read Phase Requirements

*Refer to Scope Document Excerpt, *
*Product Features 5.10*

## Streamlining

- When does streamlining happen (beginning of Read Phase)?
- Do SRA/GTAs need another screen (matrix) for streamlining or can something be added to existing screens?

## Thanks for your participation!

- Minutes and meeting related documents will be posted at _[http://era.nih.gov/areas/rev/index.cfm](http://era.nih.gov/areas/rev/index.cfm)_
- Next RUG Meeting:
- Monday, May 6, 2002, 1 pm (CD Ordering)
- Rockledge II Room 3087
- Next IAR Focus Group Meeting:
- Monday, May 13, 2002, 1:30 – 4 pm
- Rockledge II Room 3014
# Presentation: 211663

## Spectra Sensors, Incand WVSS II MeetingBackgroundDavid HelmsNOAA/NWS/OST

- Insert Date

## Outline

- AMDAR (MDCRS) and WVSS
- WVSS I
- Post WVSS I
- WVSS II Team
- WVSS II Planning
- WVSS II Phase 1
- WVSS II Phase 2 and Beyond
- Assessment

- Insert Date

## AMDAR and WVSS

- AMDAR (MDCRS)
- A highly leveraged, high quality, and cost effective data collection (>200:1 cost advantage to radiosonde)
- Uses air carrier “enterprise” systems to sensor and collect observations, including:
- temp and wind sensors
- data processing (e.g. ACMS)
- air-to-ground coms (ARINC/SITA)
- Part of WMO World Weather Watch  (WWW) Observing Network and GEOSS
- Used in Numerical Weather Prediction for over 10 years
*WVSS is an extension of AMDAR*

**24 Hour AMDAR Data over CONUS**

- Insert Date

## WVSS I

- 1995-1999:
- FAA AWRP and NOAA OGP Funded (>$10M)
- Sensor developed by Goodrich
- Tested in 1999 on 30 UPS B-757
- Thin Film Capacitor Sensor
- Result:
- Sensors failed after 3-6 months

- Insert Date

## Post WVSS I - Regrouping

- 1999-2001:
- Lessons Learned:
- RH uncertainty significantly increases as speed approaches high Mach #
- Environmental stress rapidly degrades TFC sensitivity
- Avoid TFC
- But... need remains for trans-tropospheric RH sensor that is capable of <5% RMS for sustained operational use (2-3 years)

- Scene from the “Flight of the Phoenix” (1965)

- WVSS I

- WVSS II

- Insert Date

## Water Vapor

**Water Vapor**
**Sensing System II**
**Team**

- Insert Date

## WVSS II Planning

- 2001:
- A new approach is developed:
- Diode laser technology solves the Mach # problem and sensor stability
- SpectraSensors takes the lead as the sensor developer
- 2002:
- NWS provides WVSS II “seed” funding
- 2003:
- Real-world field tests accomplished (BAMEX)

- Insert Date

## WVSS II Phase 1

- AUG 04:  Operational test and deployment plans developed
- DEC 04:  WVSS II STC is received from FAA
- FEB 05:  Phase 1 WVSS II installations commence and data is received in quantity
- JUN 05:  First Field Test Completed

- Insert Date

## WVSS II Phase 2 and Beyond

- FY06:  RFP solicitation
- Approx $1M for first year of deployment, potentially more in FY07+
- Phase 2 field test in spring 2006
- Includes sensor software and hardware “fixes” identified during phase 1
- Target 1,600 sensors deployed systems on national and international routes

- WVSS II Intake and Diode Laser

- Insert Date

## Assessment

- June 2005 Field Test assessment critical for showing system viability; reports from CIMSS in Dec 05; prelim results show good data through 6 km/500 hPa/18 kft
- Model assessment will require 150 or more instrumented aircraft to have “economies of scale” impact from WVSS II (FY08)

**Radiosonde (purple) and **
**WVSSII (black) Comparison **
**April 26, 2005**

- Insert Date
# Presentation: 110129

## The Stanford InterLib Digital Library Project

## Activities

- Photo Browser
- PowerBrowser
- SDLIP
- P2P
- Querying Multiple Storage Models
- Distributed Archiving
- Neonatal Ambulanceand Helicopter Transport
- WebBase

- http://diglib.stanford.edu

## Packard Children’s Hospital

- Photo Browser
- PowerBrowser
- SDLIP
- P2P
- Querying Multiple Storage Models
- Distributed Archiving
- Neonatal Ambulanceand Helicopter Transport
- WebBase

-  Infants/maternity patients  from outlying hospitals to  Stanford
-  Tablet computer + DB +   wireless connection
-  Information-driven   teamwork
-  Information shared and    mobile
-  Ethnographic study

## Packard Children’s Hospital

- Photo Browser
- PowerBrowser
- SDLIP
- P2P
- Querying Multiple Storage Models
- Distributed Archiving
- Neonatal Ambulanceand Helicopter Transport
- WebBase

-  Infants/maternity patients  from outlying hospitals to  Stanford
-  Tablet computer + DB +   wireless connection
-  Information-driven   teamwork
-  Information shared and    mobile
-  Ethnographic study   Paper napkins instead of    envelopes!

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Activities

- Photo Browser
- PowerBrowser
- SDLIP
- P2P
- Querying Multiple Storage Models
- Distributed Archiving
- Neonatal Ambulanceand Helicopter Transport
- WebBase

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## InterLib Interactions

- Columbia

- UC Berkeley

- U. Washington

- SDSC

- Harvey Mudd

- Stanford

- _WebBase Stream Clients:_
-  Relation extraction
-  Persistent URLs
-  Teaching
-  Index storage

## InterLib Interactions

- Columbia

- UC Berkeley

- U. Washington

- SDSC

- Harvey Mudd

- UC Santa Barbara

- Stanford

- _Alexandria Gazetteer:_
-  PhotoBrowser georeferencing

## InterLib Interactions

- Columbia

- UC Berkeley

- U. Washington

- SDSC

- Harvey Mudd

- NSDL

- UC Santa Barbara

- Stanford

- _NSDL:_
-  SDLIP (and OAI)

## InterLib Interactions

- Columbia

- UC Berkeley

- U. Washington

- SDSC

- Harvey Mudd

- NSDL

- UC Santa Barbara

- Stanford

- Stanford Hospital

## It’s All Science and Very Complicated!

|                                                                   |
| --- |

- 

## And of course we use...

## Slide 16

## Activities

- Photo Browser
- PowerBrowser
- SDLIP
- P2P
- Querying Multiple Storage Models
- Distributed Archiving
- Neonatal Ambulanceand Helicopter Transport
- WebBase

## Slide 18
# Presentation: 433358

## Night Navigation

- Developed as part of the National Emergency Services Curriculum Project

## What’s Different?

- Typically teams move much slower
- Why?
- Vision impaired
- Seeing Black and White Mostly
- Simply not comfortable
- Is there a solution?
- Not total, but workable

**Notes:**
Teams need to be especially careful in working at night.  There are obvious limitations.

## What do we do?

- Wear _reflective_ vests
- Use Red Lens in Flashlight
- Avoid especially dangerous areas
- Only send experienced personnel to the field at night
- Wait until daytime if necessary - Use the Night for planning and crew rest

**Notes:**
There are several things that you can do to help yourself though.

## Why use a red lens?

- As light decreases, the sensing tasks are passed over from the cones to the rods of the eyes.
- The sensitivity of the rods involves a pigment called visual purple (rhodopsin) which is bleached in bright light and takes time to re-constitute
- Because the rods are less sensitive to red light, we use red lenses in our lights to keep our limited night vision

## Why else should we use a red lens?

- It takes on average 40+ minutes to regain your night vision
- Younger people tend to adapt quicker than adults to the dark

## Slide 6

## Be careful out there!
# Presentation: 265859

## Jet Reconstruction in Heavy Ion Backgrounds

**K****étévi A. Assamagan**
**Brookhaven National Laboratory**

## Outline

- Jet reconstruction
- Calibration
- Energy resolution
- Reconstruction efficiency
- Fake jet

## Jet Reconstruction

- We have already demonstrated that we can reconstruct jets in heavy ion backgrounds

- Reconstructed jets in p-p

- Reconstructed jets in pb-pb

- 55 GeV jets

- 70 GeV jets

## Efficiencies, Resolutions and fake jets

- The questions are:
- Can we reconstructed jets at the correct energies?
- Reconstruction efficiencies?
- Energy Resolutions?
- Contamination of  “fake” jets?

## Jet Energy Calibration

- Better resolution after calibration. Still, offset in residual

## Jet Energy Calibration

- Calibration ~ OK: E cal/kine ~ 1

## Jet Energy Calibration

- Jet Energy calibration fine at 70 GeV

## Jet Energy Calibration

- There is an improvement after calibration, peak position &
- resolution

## Jet Energy Calibration

- E calibrated  / kine ~ 1: calibration ~ OK

## Jet Energy Calibration

- Calibration works  at 140 GeV

## Energy Resolution

- p-p

- pb-pb

- Angular
- Resolution
- in pb-pb
- central
- collisions

- 70 GeV jets, 50 Events

- Energy Resolutions: 10.4 GeV in p-p, 18.0 GeV in pb-pb

- Energy
- resolution

## Resolutions and Efficiencies

| ET (GeV) | E (GeV) | E (GeV) |  |  (rad) |  eff% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25 | 5.3 0.5 | 26.63.3 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 75 |
| 55 | 7.5 0.6 | 17.4 2.1 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 89 |
| 70 | 10.4 1.3 | 18.0 2.2 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 86 |
| 140 | 14.1 1.4 | 22.5 2.8 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 91 |

- p-p

- pb-pb

- 280                15.7 1.4   23.2 2.8    0.04       0.04         91
# Presentation: 778951

##  Data layers for ISFS

- June 7-9, 2005
- USGS Fort Collins Science Center
- National Institute of Invasive Species Science
- Fort Collins, CO

## Current summary method

***VI_date _of_greenup**

***VI_MODIS**

***VI_range**

**Time, years**

**MODIS Vegetation index (VI)**

- Science Team Meeting - June 7-9, 2005 - Fort Collins, CO

## Current summary method

***VI_date _of_greenup**

***VI_MODIS**

***VI_range**

**Time, years**

**MODIS Vegetation index (VI)**

- Science Team Meeting - June 7-9, 2005 - Fort Collins, CO

## Improved summaries with Jonsson and Eklund’s “TIMESAT”

**Savitzky–Golay filter**

**Non-symmetric gaussian**

**Harmonic functions**

**Improved summaries with ****Jonsson and Eklund’s “TIMESAT”**

**MODIS NDVI value with “poor quality” flag are marked on plot with an X**

- Science Team Meeting - June 7-9, 2005 - Fort Collins, CO

## Parameters extracted from TIMESAT

- End of season
- Left 90% level
- Right 90% level
- Peak
- Amplitude
- Length of season
- Integral over season - scaled
- Integral over season - absolute

- TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor dataPer Jonsson & Lars Eklund, Computers & Geosciences 30:833-845, 2004.

- Science Team Meeting - June 7-9, 2005 - Fort Collins, CO

## Additional considerations

- Apply TIMESAT to MODIS
- Vegetation index and
- Net primary productivity products
- Interaction between, ISFS, USGS (EROS) and MODIS production facility is needed to efficiently produce TIMESAT summaries
- Consider other “GIS” layers (roads/urban areas, trails, ect.)
- Consider meteorological or climate variables
- Ames “Ecological Forecasting” (Temp, precip., vapor pressure deficit, solar radiation, soil moisture)
- Soils...water table...hydrology
- Spectral libraries
- Operational system:
- needs framework to solicit input from user community
- will be enhanced by continued NASA support for ingesting and processing of NASA data products

- Science Team Meeting - June 7-9, 2005 - Fort Collins, CO
# Presentation: 693938

## Initial Collaborative RoutingActivities and Evaluation

- James Wetherly
- FAA/AOZ-400
- 202.233.2141
- APR 99

## Background

- FFP1 sponsorship for evaluating various proposed collaborative routing capabilities.
- Scope of evaluation limited to capabilities with potential benefit for near term implementation.
- Need for the design and acquisition strategy for certain functionality as well as focus R&D activity for “loose ends”.
- Initial report due to the Administrator on 7/99

## Tools/Procedures Under Evaluation

- PicTel and TFM Web Servers
- Collaborative Routing Coordination Tool
- Consensus Convective Forecast Product
- Coded SWAP Routes
- Low Altitude Arrival and Departure Routes

## Approach

- Operational and functional evaluation
- No brand names
- Learn from existing design
- Methods for evaluation and data collection
- Feedback via logs, ETMS archived data, etc
- Input from specialists and AOCs
- Observation
- Tools (POET, FSM and FSA)

## PicTel and TFM Web Servers

- Pictel
- Evaluate usefulness of data/application sharing technology in an ATM setting
- Airline involvement
- Content dependency
- TFM Web Servers
- Evaluate existing content
- Evaluate marginal benefit of encasing it w/PicTel

## CRCT

- Concept Prototype deployed and evaluated at Kansas City
- Concept Prototype under deployment at ATCSCC w/ National “functionality”
- Three builds
- Need to allow for AOC input also
- Evaluation will lead to architectural and deployment strategy

## CCFP

- AWC will deliver Wx Product to the ATCSCC in time for telcon
- Internet and CDMnet access
- Evaluate improved coordination as a result of shared view
- Evaluate execution of plan as a result

## National DB for Coded SWAP Routes

- Build on existing data from centers that already make use of the routes.
- Make case for continued development and deployment of the national database.
- Potential interaction with Host also being addressed separately.

## LAADR (Tunneling)

- Build on existing data from centers that already make use of the routes.
- Make case for incorporation in National SWAP Plan.

## Organization/Structure

- Sponsor - AOZ-400  (POC Jim Wetherly)
- Key Players
- ATCSCC
- AOCs via CR workgroup Co-Chair (Pear)
- ATO-400 Trish Horan for facility coordination
- Evaluation Team
- Independent Evaluation Agent - NEXTOR
- Support Role - Metron, CAASD, Crown, Cygnacom, TRW

## Process

- Evaluation Plan Outline 		Available
- Analysis Team Meeting 		Biweekly
- Operations Team Meet		Biweekly
- Status
- PicTel Web Server			Up
- CRCT  Build 1				3 May
- CCFP					mid May
- Coded SWAP Routes*			20 May
- LAADR*					Up
- 				* evaluation based on existing information

## Process (concluded)

- CR Workshop
- Sounding board for input
- Results to be briefed

## Expectations

- Assess operational benefit from these efforts.
- Establish a case for immediate next steps in the evolution of TFM Congestion Management Tools.
- Provide insight that will allow quickest deployment of mature functionality.
- Capture what is missing and focus further research to refine requirements for follow up implementation.

## Discussion