BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 021592

## Domestic U.S. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (DRVSM)

- Presentation 1

**Domestic U.S. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (DRVSM)**

- Introduction
- October 11, 2004
**DRVSM SEMINAR  Oct 11, 2004**

## DRVSM Program Leads

- Robert Swain - Flight Technologies and Procedures Division (AFS-400)
- Steve Creamer – Air Traffic Operations – Enroute
- Brian Colamosca -Separation Standards Group,
- 	Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center

## Seminar Objectives

- Focus on technical and operational issues
- Provide information on documents, contacts,  processes and procedures required to gain aircraft and operator approval for RVSM operations
- Provide information on status of planning to implement RVSM in US National Airspace System

##  Public Comment		

- _Not_ a seminar objective to debate DRVSM
- 90-day DRVSM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) public comment period provided forum for  views on program

## Seminars

- Seven previous FAA/Industry seminars held between  April 2002 – June 2004
- FAA Inspector Seminars held in April and Sept 2003

## Administrative Details

- CSSI Staff
- Roy Grimes
- Bob Miller
- Latonia Sewell
- Curt Zimmerman
- Hotel Phone Number:702-732-5711
- Hotel Fax Number702-732-5805

- Lunch Options:
- Hotel:
- Las Vegas Hilton Restaurant
- Hilton Steakhouse
- Margarita Grille
- Quarks Bar and Restaurant
- Mistral
- Garden of the Dragon
- Teru Sushi
- Benihana
- Andiamo

## Agenda

- Program Overview
- Brief Air Traffic Overview
- RVSM Website and Documents
- Aircraft and Operator Approval Programs
- Safety Assessment, Approvals Database and Monitoring
- Conclusion
- History of vertical separation slides in back of binder

## Conclusion

- Seminar briefings available on RVSM website:
**www.faa.gov/ats/ato/rvsm1.htm**
- Click Domestic RVSM tab then DRVSM Seminars
- CSSI will route follow-up questions to appropriate FAA office:
- drvsm@cssiinc.com
- Phone 202-863-2175
# Presentation: 888230

## JIM Job Security - Architecture

**              ****Proxy from service**
**               ****certificates**
**               ****Data & executable written**
**               ****to the disk**

**JOB**

**JIM Job Security - Architecture**

**Execution Site**

**Submission Client**

**Broker**

**Scheduler**

**Collector**

**Globus Gatekeeper**

**Job Manager**

**Jim Advertise**

**JOB**

**User X**

**Sam**

**Sam**

**Sam**

**Sam**

**Root**

**User X**

**User X**
# Presentation: 678957

## Poisoning Deaths-Time for a new definition?

- Lois A. Fingerhut and Clare Griffiths
- May 2004

## Counting poisoning deaths as an underlying cause of death

- ICD-definition in mortality matrix
- Unintentional
- Suicide
- Homicide
- Undetermined

- ICD codes are:
- Drug-related
- Alcohol- related
- Gases and vapors

## Drug-related codes in Mental Health Chapter of ICD

- F10-F19
- Alcohol (F10)
- Opioids (F11)
- Cocaine (F14)
- Other (F12-13, 15-16, 18-19)
- 4th digits..

## 4th digits... (leading ones in US)

- 0  acute intoxication (primarily alcohol)
- 1 harmful use
- 2 dependence syndrome (primarily alcohol)
- 3-9  other

## ICD ‘definitions’ of drug poisoning: this analysis

|  |  | ICD-10 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Nondependent abuse of drugs | 
305.2-.9 | F11-16, 18-19 (not .2) |
| Dependent abuse | 304 | F11-16,18-19(.2) |
| Unintentional | E850-E858 | X40-X44 |
| Suicide | E950(.0-5) | X60-X64 |
| Undetermined | E980(.0-.5) | Y10-Y19 |
| Homicide | E962.0 | X85 |
| Alcohol intoxication | 305.0 | F10.0 |

_**ICD-9**_

**Notes:**
For this presentation, my co-authors and I agreed that there were various ways one could define drug poisoning deaths. For t he orange block there was unanimous agreement. Note however, that the nondep abuse codes have never been an accepted inclusion into the definition of poisoning death.  In E&W, The codes for Dependent abuse of drugs are included in their poisoning death reports (separate from all cause reports). Alcohol intox is not included but a case can be made for it...

## Drug poisoning deaths, ages 35-54 by intent and abuse

## All (??) Poisoning deaths: US 2001

## National Academy of Science May 2004

- U.S. Institute of Medicine has recommended that WHO should review and reform the ICD codes for poisoning
- NCHS should review the methodology of its existing surveys to maximize the value....for poison prevention and control.
- From: Forging a Poison Prevention and Control System (2004)
# Presentation: 456350

## Status of the SLI Excess Facilities Disposition Program 

**Presentation to the **
**SC Facilities Management Workshop **
**October 23-24, 2002**
- David Michlewicz
- Laboratory Infrastructure Division
- Office of Science

## Topics

**FY 2002 Accomplishments **
**Plans for FY 2003**
**Plans for Outyears**

## FY 2002 Accomplishments

## FY 2002 Accomplishments – Innovative Practices

- FNAL, the laboratory combined procurement with similar work in the vicinity of the project to achieve cost and coordination efficiencies that maintained the project within baseline.
- The LLNL project was accomplished by using an "Assets for Value" salvage contract.  In that contract, the laboratory offered up legacy equipment as an off-set to the contractor to lower his bid price. This led to the clearing of an additional 70,000 ft. sq. for the estimated cost of the project.
- On demolition of Building 331 and the dog kennels at PNNL cost avoidance through recycling of material from the demolition saved $22,416.
- For the building demolitions at SLAC, the laboratory was able to receive a very favorable bid by incorporating all of the Environment Safety and Health issues as a performance measure in the demolition specification. This resulted cost savings of $216,000, which it will use for On the Neon Compressor Building Demolition at demolition of additional buildings in early FY 2003. This approach is essentially the same as the one employed at the Rocky Flat project referenced by HAC.

## Plans for FY 2003

## Plans for FY 2003 - Continued

## Plans for Outyears
# Presentation: 611645

## Purpose

- Provide method of having an object in chunk *B* refer to an object in chunk *A*.
- class *BChunk* may not depend on class *AChunk* in more than name
- must be type safe, some checks only at runtime
- defer Event lookup until the link is used
- must work with polymorphism
- supports vectors of pointers to objects in one chunk, or in many chunks of similar type

## General Information

- Links exist in three states
- Data only or ID/index format (on disk)
- Finished or Event*/ID/index format (before reference)
- Resolved to pointer (after first reference)
- Where state changes occur
- Read in from d0om (data only)
- Methods in chunk (finished)
- From LinkPtr classes (Resolved)

## More On Links

- LinkIndex classes hold data only info
- Chunks hold LinkIndex
- Chunks do link finishing
- LinkPtr required to traverse the link
- Algorithm creates LinkPtr from LinkIndex
- Default lookup function uses chunk at() method
- Not in base class *AbsChunk*
- Default index type is 20 bits

## Creating the LinkIndex Types

- HitChunk& hitlist = ... find hitlist ...;
- ChunkID hits_id = hitlist.chunkID();
- Hit* hit = hitlist.at(5);
- LinkIndex<Hit> lhit(hit,hits_id,5);
- LinkIndexVector<Hit> lhits(hitlist);
- lhits.contents().push_back(5);
- lhits.contents().push_back(6);
- MultLinkIndexVector< LinkIndex<Hit> > ml;
- ml.contents().push_back(LinkIndex<Hit>(hit1,hits1_id,5);
- ml.contents().push_back(LinkIndex<Hit>(hit2,hits2_id,5);

## Creating & Using LinkPtr Types

- LinkIndex<Hit> ihit(...);
- LinkPtr<HitChunk,Hit> phit(ihit);
- phit->do_something();
- LinkIndexVector<Hit> vihit(...);
- LinkPtrVector<HitChunk,Hit> vphit(vihit);
- vphit.at(0)->do_something();
- vphit.at(1)->do_something();
- MultiLinkIndexVector< Link<Hit> > iml(...);
- MultiLinkPtrVector<HitChunk,Link<Hit> > pml(iml);
- iml.at(0)->do_something();
- iml.at(1)->do_something();

## Converting LinkPtr  LinkIndex

- LinkPtr<HitChunk,Hit> phit(...);
- LinkIndex<Hit> ihit = phit;
- LinkPtrVector<HitChunk,Hit> pvhit(...);
- sort(pvhit.begin(),pvhit.end(),makeLinkPred(HitPred,pvhit));
- // can remove/add entries
- LinkIndexVector<Hit> ivhit = pvhit;
- MultiLinkPtrVector< HitChunk,Link<Hit> > pmhit(...);
- // can sort and remove/add entries
- MultiLinkIndexVector<Link<Hit> > imhit = pmhit;

## Finishing the LinkIndex Types

*- Must be propagated down from chunk to it’s objects*
*since objects in one chunk refer to objects in another.*

- AbsChunk* chunk;
- LinkIndex<Hit> lhit;
- finishUpLink(lhit,chunk);
- LinkIndexVector<Hit> vhit;
- finishUpLink(vhit,chunk);
- MultiLinkIndexVector< Link<Hit> > mhit;
- finishUpLink(mhit,chunk);
# Presentation: 689684

## Domestic U.S. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (DRVSM)

- Presentation 1

**Domestic U.S. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (DRVSM)**

- Introduction
- September 9, 2003
**DRVSM SEMINAR  Sept. 9-10, 2003**

## DRVSM Program Leads

- Robert Swain - Flight Technologies and Procedures Division (AFS-400)
- Steve Creamer - Enroute/Terminal Operations and Procedures (ATP-6)
- Brian Colamosca -Separation Standards Group (ACB-310)

## Seminar Objectives

- Focus on technical and operational issues
- Provide information on documents, contacts,  processes and procedures required to gain aircraft and operator approval for RVSM operations
- Provide information on status of planning to implement RVSM in US National Airspace System

##  Public Comment		

- Comment process provides forum for public views on program
- Not a seminar objective to debate DRVSM
- 90-day public comment period on DRVSM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
- 45-day public comment period on Supplemental NPRM

## Schedule for Future Seminars

- Industry seminars held in April and September 2002; February and June 2003
- FAA Inspector Seminar in April 2003; 2nd inspector seminar Sept 23-24 in Atlanta
- Two more FAA/Industry seminars planned:
- Feb 4-5 2004 in Dallas
- April-May 2004 if required

## Administrative Details

- CSSI Staff
- Roy Grimes			Bob Miller
- Karen Rees			Rod Carlson
- Hotel Phone Number	1-206-443-5000
- Hotel Fax Number		1-206-256-1100
- Lunch Options:
- Hotel:	Fish Club,   Trolley Cafe
- Outside:	Anthony’s Pier 66,  Bell Street Diner,
- 			Anthony’s Fish Bar,  Buffalo Deli
- Reception:	Tuesday, Sept. 9 from 6-8 pm
- Sponsored by AeroMech Inc.

## Agenda

- Program Overview
- Air Traffic Overview
- RVSM Website and Documents
- Aircraft and Operator Approval Programs
- Safety Assessment, Approvals Database and Monitoring
- Conclusion
- History of vertical separation slides in back of binder

## Conclusion

- Seminar briefings available on RVSM website:
**www.faa.gov/ats/ato/rvsm1.htm**
- Click Domestic RVSM tab then DRVSM Seminars
- CSSI will route follow-up questions to appropriate FAA office:
- drvsm@cssiinc.com
- Phone 202-863-2175
# Presentation: 407882

## 3D particle tracking in MWS environment

- Gennady Romanov
- July 27, 2006

##    We are approaching high power tests. Some phenomena we may

- meet happen because of unwanted acceleration and movement of
- background  or emitted particles by high level RF fields. To study
- them we need to track particle motion inside RF devices in presence
- of RF fields and may be static external fields. We can use the particle
- tracking for:
-  Multipacting study, which is most interesting application and our
-   primary goal .
-  X-ray generation: we could estimate level of radiation or track particles
-   from hot spot back to probable emission area.
-  Breakdowns: we can track where the debris fly and look whether
-   they can damage a  surface
-  Also we can study RF deflectors and beam monitors that use secondary
-   emission

_**Motivation **_

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## Why MWS? Requirements

_**Why MWS? Requirements**_

- Mathematica

- Delphi + Pascal

- Graphical User Interface – multi-window mode, click events, drag’n’drop, snap-to-grid....
- 2._ Geometry_ – **3D solid model native to the fields**
- 3. _Fields_ – 3D, accurate and interpolated for fast integration
- 4. Visual feedback – 3D trajectories, dialog boxes with results, cut, zoom, rotate, real time tracking,
-         display selected trajectories...

**?**

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## There must be interpolating function:

- Fig.5. Surface plot of Ey component given by MAFIA in plane z=0. Nx, Ny – numbers of mesh lines.

**E****y****, Vm**

**E****y****, V/m**

**x**

- y

- Fig.6 Smoothed Ey component

- 1) No “holes” in fields 2) Minimum calculations at each step of calculations

_**Fields**_

- SSR. Snapshot of real time
- simulation with 5000 particles

- 350 MHz buncher with external
- static solenoidal field. Snapshot
- of real time scanning over field
- level and phase with multiple
- collisions.

- MWS creates interpolating function automatically
- which is very fast.
- Some bug has been found though...
- Also it provides an easy access to all 3D results.

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## Geometry

_**Geometry**_

- Solid model must be “native” to fields
- It just impossible to develop homemade
-      code comparable  to modern CAD software
- We need to put starting points on a surface
-       and to define exact moment when a particle
-       hits a wall.

- MWS has many built-in objects to handle
- points and boundaries. They are ready to use.

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## Some examples

_**Some examples**_

- RT CH 1

- Buncher

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## Field level variation

- Initial phase variation

- Different starting points

_**Playing with coaxial resonator**_

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006

## Next steps.

- Try to fix the bug in interpolating function object ( with help from CST)
- Decide, should we use MWS VBA only or link it with  MatLab,
-       Mathematica, C++...
- If yes, what MWS should be – client or server?
- Depending on 2 and 3 decision start to develop real GUI

- Gennady Romanov

- July 27, 2006
# Presentation: 662981

## Pond Sediment Metal Concentrations in the Vicinity of the Space Shuttle Launch Pads at The Kennedy Space Center

- David Ishiyama
- The University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

## Initial Description

- 	The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is concerned with how its activities impact environment surrounding the Kennedy Space Center (KSC).  One such activity is the Space Shuttle launch and the metal deposition resulting from its plume. This study measures metal concentration (Zn, Al) in the ponds surrounding Space Shuttle Pads 39-A and 39-B. Sediment samples were analyzed by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emissions Spectrometer (ICP OEM) according to the Standard Method 3051. Results show that, although slightly more elevated than the control, aluminum concentration is decreasing at both pads while zinc is increasing at Pad 39-B but decreasing at Pad 39-A. Many factors, such as the number of launches, intensity and direction of plume deposition, amount of rainfall, and circulation of the water at each pond, can play a significant impact on the metal concentrations at each site. Future research on metal bioaccumulation on the local flora and fauna will show any overall ecosystem impact.

## Data

- Figure 4.  Annual Concentrations of Al near Pad 39-A, 39-B, and a Control Site in the Banana RIver

- Figure 5.  Annual Concentrations of Zn near Pad 39-A, 39-B, and a Control Site in the Banana River

## Results

- 	The concentrations of Al and Zn are greater around Pad 39-A and Pad 39-B when compared to the Al and Zn concentrations of the control site in the Banana River.  The concentration of Al metal in the sediments surrounding launch pads 39-A and 39-B fluctuates periodically but the basal concentration of Al decreases as a function of time. The concentration of Zn metal in the sediments surrounding Pad 39-A also fluctuates periodically but the basal concentration of Zn decreases as a function of time in the vicinity of Pad 39-A. However, the concentration of Zn metal in the sediments surrounding Pad 39-B fluctuate periodically and increase as a function of time. These data refute the increasing metal basal concentration hypothesis. Many factors, such as the number of launches, intensity and direction of plume deposition, amount of rainfall, and circulation of the water at each pond, can play a significant impact on the metal concentrations at each site.
# Presentation: 720664

## Thermal Analysis of Al-CuO nanocomposites

- Nancy Huemer

## Two different nanocomposites were studied:

Al-CuO milled with 1ml of hexane
	milling time 16 min.
Al-CuO milled with 8ml of hexane
	milling time 60 min.
Synthesized using ARM (arrested reactive milling)

- Al-CuO milled with 1ml of hexane
- 	milling time 16 min.
- Al-CuO milled with 8ml of hexane
- 	milling time 60 min.
- Synthesized using ARM (arrested reactive milling)

## Principle and Equipment used for experiments

- Differential Scanning Calorimetry
-                                                   Diagram of the inside of a DSC
- Netzsch STA 409 PC Luxx DSC

## Different experiments performed

- Kinetics in Argon -1 ml and 8 ml samples
- Kinetics in Oxygen-1 ml and 8 ml samples
- Heated samples to 740o C
- Heating rates used
- 5, 10, 20 and 40 k/min.
- Quenching
- Quenched samples of 8ml at 500o and 325o C

## Kinetics of 1ml in Argon

## Kinetics of 8ml in Argon

## Kinetics of 1ml in Oxygen

## Kinetics of 8ml in Oxygen

## Comparison of 1ml & 8ml in Ar Heating rate , 5 K

## Comparison of 1ml and 8ml in O2 Heating rate , 5 K

## Comparison of 1ml in Ar and O2Heating Rate, 5 K 

## Comparison of 8ml in Argon and O2  Heating Rate, 5K

## Quenching 

- Quenched 8ml samples to determine the nature of the exothermic events present in the plots of 8 ml in Argon.
- 325o C
- 500o C

## Oxidation 

- Tests in Oxygen were performed to study the difference between this and an inert Argon environment
-                    **1ml**                               **8ml**

## SEM Images

**Al**

**CuO**

- Al-CuO milled with 8 mL		    milled with 1 mL

## Future Studies

- XRD analysis of the quenched samples
- Complete oxidation samples
- Quenching in Oxygen at 500o C
# Presentation: 340048

## AIRS VALIDATION MEASUREMENT STATUS

|  | Wallops  | Natal | Ascension
Island | Andros
Island | Andenes | ESRANGE
Kiruna |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ozonesonde | 31 | 20 | 16 | 9 |  |  |
| Chilled Mirror | 6 | (18 available
on site) |  | 12 | 5 |  |
| Rocketsonde |  |  |  |  | 8 | 14 |
| ATM Radiosonde | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Radiosonde |  |  |  |  | 4 | 16 |

- June 23, 2002  - February 28, 2003

## Future Measurement Opportunities

- ~	continue measurements of ozone and water vapor in the near 	time from Wallops Island
- ~	return to Andros Island, The Bahamas, is an option for late 		spring or early summer
- ~	other validation sites available to us are:
- 	-	Areceibo, Puerto  Rico
- 	-	Kauai, HI
- 	-	Dryden Area (possibly Table Mountian)
- 	-	Key West
- 	-	other locations specified by the AIRS Science Team
# Presentation: 935061

## Briefing on Conference and Workshop Support

- Ruth Pordes
- 4/24/07

- Conference Support

## Goals of the Briefing

- The Computing Division organizes more and more conferences and meeting every year. CD personnel help and support the organization and running of the meetings.
- These are becoming larger, more frequent and more “important” in the mission of the lab and the Division.
- Some of them are not on site or even in the Chicago area.
- The goal is to support Conference and Workshops most effectively and efficiency across the board.
- Some Initial Questions:
- What is the end-to-end set of support needed?
- Do we, should we document the responsibilities, authorities and procedures?
- What is  the most efficient way to organize the meetings?
- Do we have sufficient and/or the right infrastrucures in place?
- In what cases and how should we rely on the Conference Office?

- Conference Support

## Initial list of support tasks

- Event registration, presentation and documentation infrastructure and repositories.
- Web page creation and maintenance
- Hotel, shuttle bus etc reservations
- Participant registration, accommodation etc and registration fee collection if appropriate
- Coordination of the various venues (dinner, vendors etc)
- Administrative support for the event
- Documenting procedures/guidelines for event organization
- Understanding the up to date lab policies on event organization at Fermilab.

- Conference Support
# Presentation: 323884

## SAR Responsibilities & Team Activation

- Developed as part of the National Emergency Services Curriculum Project

## SAR Responsibilities in the United States

- Navigable Waterways  - USCG
- Localized Land Search - Local Law Enforcement or Emergency Management
- Missing Aircraft or Distress Beacon Searches within one state - State designated representative (often CAP or sheriff’s aviation division
- Missing Aircraft or Distress Beacon Searches across state boundaries - AFRCC assigns under federal jurisdiction

## Information Gathering

- Be a good reporter and ask questions
- Who
- What
- When
- Where
- Why
- How
- 20 Questions - Chapter

## What to do when you get the call

- Treat the situation as a serious mater
- Get contact information from the caller
- Get as much additional info. as you can
- Make certain the person can get back to you
- Remember whose job it really is!
- You may be called just because you are a known emergency responder in the community
- Contact the agency with primary responsibility

## Resources

- Primary - organizations whose primary job is SAR
- USCG
- CAP
- Military rescue units
- ...

## Resources continued

- Secondary - organizations with the capability to support searches
- American Red Cross
- Salvation Army
- ...

## Conducting Alerts

- If CAP is the resource to be used for the search, you will need to be able to readily get in touch with your personnel quickly and with the information they need.  This can be done via several methods:
- Phone(Typically most reliable)
- Pager
- E-mail

## Sample Phone Tree

- 1st Lt. Smith
- 555-1111

- 2nd Lt. Jones
- 555-2222

- S/M Green
- 555-6666

- C/FO Brown
- 555-3333

- C/SSgt. Doe
- 555-4444

- C/Amn Black
- 555-4444

- C/Sgt. White
- 555-5555

- C/Amn Cook
- 555-7777

- C/B Davis
- 555-8888

## Minimum Alert Information

- Type of Mission
- Expected Duration of Mission
- Time and Location of Meeting Place
- Special Instructions
- Mission Number
- Call Back Number

## Preparedness

- If you are not ready to go out on a mission or have limitations to your participation tell the person calling
- Equipment
- Crew Rest
- Other Obligations

## Team Activation Tasks

- Ground Team Member
- P-0102
# Presentation: 520206

## Beams Week in Review

- 7 stores
- Another record Initial Luminosity – 19.60 E30
- Record Integrated Luminosity – ~3600 nb-1
- Linac problems
- LRF3 PA aka ‘toasty’ dying
- Reduce Linac beam current ~10%
- Machine studies
- Shutdown date set – 3 June for ~12 days

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Initial Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Initial Luminosity

- Reason for Recent Improvement
- Continued refinement of Tevatron octupole tuning at 150 GeV
- More Pbars used

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Octupole Tuning

- Store 1291

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Protons to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbars to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

- 150 GeV Lifetime
- 12 X 0 store for CDF (growth of losses)
- Tevatron Electron Lens studies at 150 GeV
- Tunes at the start of ramp (tune up work)

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

- 150 GeV Lifetime preliminary analysis
- ~10 hr lifetime due to vacuum
- ~15 hr lifetime due to leakage from RF bucket
- 	~6 hr lifetime maximum under these conditions
- 12X0 store – Losses in the abort gap are much less with only protons.  (TEL was not on for these measurements)

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

- TEL – Unable to increase proton lifetime by introducing tune spread, but may be useful to eliminate DC beam at 150 GeV.  This may allow us to stuff more Protons into the Tevatron.
- Improved acceleration efficiency by adjusting differential tunes at start of ramp.

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

- Store 1302

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies Summary

- Stack without core transverse cooling
- 5-6 mA/hour
- Bodes well for new cooling installation
- New Core 2-4 GHz momentum cooling configuration
- Flying Wire development
- Diffusion measurements
- Ions may contribute up to 30% of large stack (100 mA) emittance growth

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

- $2B emittance in MI
- Transverse (revisited)
- Longitudinal (revisited)
- Beam Line Tuner

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Recycler Studies Summary

- Work continues with both protons and pbars
- Injection efficiency
- RF manipulations
- Stack
- Extract Pbars to MI

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Recycler Studies Summary

- All Experimenters Meeting
# Presentation: 195057

## ESRL Model Probabilistic Post Processor (EMP3)

- And
- Personal Weather Advisor
- Holub, McCaslin, McGinley, Sahm
- GSD/FAB

## Full Ensemble Forecast System with Decision Support Attributes.Assumes everyone wants a Yes-No Forecast

- 6-D model grids
- (variable,x,y,z,t,prob)

- Decision
- Engine

- Cost/Loss
- Thresholds

- Yes or No

- Ensemble

- Location,
- Time

- Customer

## Goal: Test User Interface for Public Access

- Surface data only
- Threshold Settings
- Probabilistic Thresholding (decision criteria)
- Start with SREF
- Simple assumptions on PDF recovery

## Defining acceptable risk

- Danger threshold defined by user
- Probability density function is used to find probability of threshold
-        P(danger) = area B/ (area A + area B)
- Interrogator determines user’s risk factor, R
- No go if P(danger) > R

- Probability
-  density of
- event

- Weather element

- Danger threshold

- A

- B

## Summary

- EMP3 allows user to set meteorological criteria critical
- to success of some task
- Probabilistic criteria is set based on Cost-Lost,
- acceptable risk factors, etc, defined by interrogator
- Personal Weather Advisor indicates time periods where
- task should be attempted.
- Utilizes Google Earth via NOAA license

## Future work

- Verification and bias removal of ensemble set
- Multiple variables and joint probabilities
- More advanced interrogator
- Decision support for routes (point A to point B, via C)
- Decision support for areas
# Presentation: 021603

## The Hadron Collider Physics Symposium 2007 has been hosted by INFN-Pisa in La Biodola (Elba Island) Italy, May 20-26, 2007.

**The ****Hadron Collider Physics Symposium 2007**** ****has been hosted by INFN-Pisa in La Biodola (Elba Island) Italy, May 20-26, 2007.**
**The Conference was rather successful and the Proceedings have been recently published in Nuclear Physics B (Proc Suppl.) 177+178 (2008).**

## Hadron Collider Physics Symposium in “La Biodola”

**La Biodola, Isola d'Elba (Italy)****    **

*Pictures of the conference site resort*

**Sezione di Pisa**

**Based on the 2007 very positive experience we can offer to host again in 2011 the Symposium in “La Biodola”, the most exclusive bay of the Elba Island, in the Hermitage Hotel next to a beach with golden sand.**

**At the Hermitage excellent conference services and facilities can be provided: **
** ****a large Auditorium (****~**** 380 people) for plenary sessions, **
** ****space for poster sessions (****~160 posters 70x90 cm2)**** **
** ****projectors for transparencies and laptops, **
** ****a number of desktops connected to a fast LAN **
** ****wireless LAN for laptops in the conf. room and in the Hotel **
**  ****A number of interesting social events and excursions can be planned. **
***What we can offer to the participants of the Symposium is an efficient and thoroughly tested organization, nice environments, pleasant weather and last, but not least, very good food!***
**We understand that in 2011 ****Paris**** could have priority since ****Pisa**** already hosted the Symposium. However we would be happy to host it again in 2011 or, may be, in 2012**
***On behalf of the INFN Pisa Section,***
***Rino Castaldi (rino.castaldi@pi.infn.it)***
# Presentation: 916483

## CDMP Project Proposal Historical  Sea Survey Data Rescue

**Task Leads:**
**Kevin Hill and Christina Show**
**  ****Southwest Fisheries Science Center**

## CDFG Sea Surveys

**Conducted annually by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), from  1950 to 1989, from northern California to southern Baja California.**
**Survey Purpose:  study the abundance, distribution, and biological condition of juvenile and adult sardine, anchovy, and mackerel in the California Current System (CCS).**
**In addition to biological data, environmental data were collected, such as SST and bathythermograph casts.**
**The completed ‘Sea Survey’ time series synchronize both temporarily and spatially with standard CalCOFI surveys – the longest running large-scale interdisciplinary ocean observing system in existence.**
**With the data readily available, scientists will be able to understand individual populations in the context of their ecosystem as a whole. **

## Task Objective

**To key-enter hard copy data collected during Sea Survey cruises from 1950 to 1967.**
**Data will be merged with an existing Microsoft Access database (1968 to 1989), completing the recovery of the Sea Survey series: 1950 to 1989.**
**With CDMP’s technology services in information and database development, it will be feasible for us to modernize and expand scope of the current database so users can visualize data through the web in addition to retrieving raw data for specific applications (future CDMP project).**

##   Existing Sea Survey Database (1968 – 1989) 

## Brief Task Description

**Source Data consist of hard copy ‘Data Reports’ (Vol. 1-17) encompassing 18 years and 132 cruises, contained in 1,046 documents (pages).**
**No advanced preparation will be required on the part of NOAA Fisheries Service.**
**CDMP contractors will use the double-key-verify method to enter the data from each document.**
**Keying formats will be provided for each table type.**
**Output from each document can be text or Excel format.**

## Example of data to be keyed
# Presentation: 707106

## Global IOOS Milestone:  New Platforms in Service

-      FY2006 Target: 761 new ocean observing platforms deployed and reporting;
-      Feb 2006: 472 total ocean observing platforms (target 318)); 378 ARGO floats

- Feb. 06

- G

## GPRA:  Reduce the Error in Global Measurement of Sea Surface Temperature

**Reduce the error in global measurement of Sea **

**surface Temperature**

-      FY06 target: 0.5 °C;     Long-term Target: Error of 0.2 °C by 2009.

- More rapid expansion of the in situ network over the next several years will minimize the satellite bias error, enabling more accurate global sea surface temperature from a combination of satellite and in situ measurements.

- _Satellite bias error_: the systematic difference between satellite-derived vs. *in situ *actual measurement of sea surface temperature

- Dec. 05

- G
# Presentation: 665455

## SC2003 SciDAC Booth Poster

**SC2003 SciDAC Booth Poster**

**Collaboratories/Network**

**Climate**

**Fusion**

**CS ISICs**

**Scientific Application Partnerships**

**HEP**
**& NP**

**Chemistry**

**10x8 screen**

- 10’

- Fusion
- Poster
- 53”x60”

- Fusion
- Poster
- 53x60

- 5’

- 7’

- 10’

- Climate
- Posters

- 10’

- CS ISIC
- Poster
- 53”x60”

- 5’

- 7’

- CS ISIC
- Poster
- 53x60

- Math ISIC
- Posters

**Back of theater**
**screen**

**Math **
**ISICs**

- Theater Schedule and handout materials

**Side “T”s**

**2002 Booth showing construction material**

- 5’

- 8’

**All posters are 53”w x 60”h**

**20’x20’ Booth**

- SciDAC logo and title
- across the top

**Assignments**

## SC2003 SciDAC Booth 3D Views

- View showing Theater
- and flags (14”x14” SciDAC images)

- Eye-level view entering Theater

- Rear view showing posters behind the screen and where the SciDAC sign goes across the top
# Presentation: 849128

## Fermilab 8 GeV Superconducting H-minus LINAC

- TRACK X RMS 		[mm] 		0.992400
- TRACK Y RMS 		[mm] 		1.020600
- TRACK Emit X RMS N. 	[mm-mrad] 	0.455725
- TRACK Emit Y RMS N. 	[mm-mrad] 	0.500650
- TRACK Kinetic Energy	[MeV] 		8026.043252
- TRACK Energy Spread  	[keV] 		401.302163
- TRACK Long. Emittance 	[kev-mm] 	899.535082
- TRACK Bunch Length 	[mm] 		2.366264

_**TRACK OUTPUT AT STRIPPING FOIL (45mA)**_

***Fermilab 8 GeV Superconducting H******-minus LINAC***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

- _For details_ : _[http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/8/11/281/njp6_11_281.html](http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/8/11/281/njp6_11_281.html)_

## Kinetic Energy

***Kinetic Energy***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## RMS Energy Spread

***RMS Energy Spread***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## RMS Bunch Length

***RMS Bunch Length***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## Longitudinal Emittance

***Longitudinal Emittance***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## Max. Envelope

***Max. Envelope***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## RMS Envelope

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*

## RMS Normalized Emittance

***RMS Normalized Emittance***

-  *Jean-Paul Carneiro **	**	**	**             **	**	**	**	**May 15**th** 08*
# Presentation: 678625

## A Capacitive Void Fraction Instrument For

-  Proved non-intrusive design approach
-  Developed stable, accurate electronics and signal    conditioning
-  Demonstrated instrument on microgravity aircraft
-  Space-qualified instruments delivered
-  Continuing to support microgravity aircraft flights    in 1998/99 (KC-135) with the design/development of    instruments of various internal diameters
-                       ** ****COMMERCIALIZATION**
-  Sold approximately $500K worth of these instruments to    NASA for various science missions to date
-  Instrument can be used in a gravity environment. Have    had negotiations with some companies for use in gravity

- Non-intrusive instrument for measurement of
- volume-averaged or local void fraction with
- refrigerants (dielectric fluids)

**INNOVATION**

***Creare, Inc.***
***Hanover, NH***

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**

**      ****GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
-  Used in microgravity science missions aboard the     NASA KC-135 aircraft:		– To measure flow characteristics (local/avg. void          fractions and wall shear stress) in a R-134a	    refrigerant loop by NASA LeRC Microgravity Division	      – To measure flow characteristics in R-134a and R-12	    refrigerant loops by NASA JSC Crew and Thermal	    Systems Division (with Texas A&M University)

- 1991 Phase II, NAS3-26552, 7/98
- NASA Contact - Myron Hill
- Company Contact - Christopher J. Crowley

**A Capacitive Void Fraction Instrument For**
**Two-Phase Flow In Microgravity**

***Space-Qualified Version of Creare******Void Fraction Instrument***

- To be used by SBIR office staff only or by permission from Walter Kim

- Lewis Research CenterMicrogravity3-014  CD-98-77710
# Presentation: 734079

## U.S. Horticultural Trade Balance with Ongoing FTA and Proposed FTA Countries

***Source:U.S. Bureau of the Census***

## U.S. Horticultural Trade Balance with Ongoing FTA and Proposed FTA Countries

- ($3,500)

- ($3,000)

- ($2,500)

- ($2,000)

- ($1,500)

- ($1,000)

- ($500)

- $0

- $500

- 1995

- 1996

- 1997

- 1998

- 1999

- 2000

- 2001

**Calendar Years**

**Value in $ Million**

***Source:U.S. Bureau of the Census***

## U.S. Horticultural Trade Balance with Ongoing FTA and Proposed FTA Countries

- ($3,500)

- ($3,000)

- ($2,500)

- ($2,000)

- ($1,500)

- ($1,000)

- ($500)

- $0

- $500

- 1995

- 1996

- 1997

- 1998

- 1999

- 2000

- 2001

**Calendar Years**

**Value in $ Million**

***Source:U.S. Bureau of the Census***

**Surplus**

**Deficit**
# Presentation: 858761

## Transfer Functions For the D0 Method  

- Where We Were
- Pearson 4 vs. Double Gaussian
- Cuts on Extra Jet Activity
- See some info on web at
- http://www-cdf.lbl.gov/~apgibson/topmass/

- A. Gibson, Matrix Element Methods Meeting

- February 6, 2004

## Original Method

- Used regular, top group, Herwig 175 ttbar MC (no b tag requirement)
- Required at least 4 tight jets (no cut on extra jets)
- Level 4 Pt > 15 GeV, eta < 2
- Required matching between each jet and parton within cone of 0.4 (took best totdr combination, no uniqueness requirement)
- Only considered events with all 4 partons matched.
- Fit transfer function between partons and Level 5 jets (b and light quark separately)

- Used same events to fit transfer functions as to test them

- A. Gibson, Matrix Element Methods Meeting

- February 6, 2004

## Hadronic W and top mass from transfer functions – correct combination

- Hadronic W mass (GeV)

- Hadronic top mass (GeV)

- Chi2 / ndf

- Shift (GeV)

- Chi2 / ndf

- Shift (GeV)

- Histogram from simulated, reconstructed Herwig jets.
- Blue curve is prediction from transfer function, using parton level Herwig.
- Inset is chi2 as we shift the histogram against the prediction.
**Note that the prediction is systematically high!**

- A. Gibson, Matrix Element Methods Meeting

- February 6, 2004

## Details of previous slide

- Transfer functions fit to the small 175 GeV Herwig sample, compared to MC histograms from the large 175 GeV Herwig sample
- Shape wrong (shoulder in histogram at low mass), and mean shifted
- Top integral based on 2300 events of small 175 GeV sample (592 events passing cuts)
- W integral based on full small 175 GeV sample (1445 events passing cuts)

- A. Gibson, Matrix Element Methods Meeting

- February 6, 2004

- A. Gibson, Matrix Element Methods Meeting

- February 6, 2004
# Presentation: 675813

## Workgroup #118

- Software Certification for *PostalOne!*

## Issue Statement

- Define an approach for mailers to validate their electronic mailing information submissions via Web Services and Mail.dat.

**MTAC 118 ****Software Certification for *****PostalOne!***

**Notes:**
Discussion

## Desired Results

- Define an automated process for validating Mail.dat and Web Services file submissions to adopt a comprehensive approach to electronic file inspection.
- Review existing tools like the *PostalOne! *Mail.dat file validator to identify gaps and recommend enhancements.
- Recommend approaches to simplify presort and post-presort software certification in light of the new Intelligent Mail barcodes and piece level and nested Intelligent Mail barcode information being incorporated in electronic mailing information.

**MTAC 118 ****Software Certification for *****PostalOne!***

**Notes:**
Discussion

## Impact Areas

- Mail Acceptance and *PostalOne!*
- Software vendors and equipment manufacturers that generate electronic mailing information
- PAVE Certification

**MTAC 118 ****Software Certification for *****PostalOne!***

## Join Us

- Lisa Bowes
- _[lbowes@windowbook.com](mailto:lbowes@windowbook.com)_
- Dennis Ray_[dennis.m.ray@usps.gov](mailto:dennis.m.ray@usps.gov)_
# Presentation: 489068

## Anti-Spam Tagging 

- Al Lilianstrom

## Spam Tagging

- The Computing Division is testing a Spam Tagging solution
- Based on SpamAssassin
- All incoming mail to the site will be scanned and tagged as necessary

## Spam Tagging – SpamAssassin

- SpamAssassinTM is a mail filter to identify spam.
- Using its rule base, it uses a wide range of heuristic tests on mail headers and body text to identify "spam", also known as unsolicited commercial email
- http://spamassassin.org

## Spam Tagging - Scanning

- Messages will be scanned and marked as spam by adding X-Headers if certain conditions are met. These conditions are set inside SpamAssassin. We will NOT be deleting mail identified as spam.
- Mail clients should look for the 'X-Spam-Flag=Y' header to detect spam and move it to another folder with local filtering. We strongly urge people not to automatically delete spam as its possible valid email may accidentally get labeled as spam

## Spam Tagging – Sample Headers

- X-Spam-Flag: YES
- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on hepa2.fnal.gov
- X-Spam-Level: *********
- X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.3 required=5.0 tests=GAPPY_SUBJECT,MISSING_MIMEOLE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61

## Spam Tagging – Listserv

- The latest version of the Listserv software supports the ability to reject mail based on headers. We are testing this with the headers that SpamAssassin adds

## Spam Tagging – Testing

- If you want to test this service change your mail gateway forwarding to <username>@hepa.fnal.gov
- Please note – this service is not covered under any type of support structure at this time
- We expect to go live with this service in February

## Instant Messaging at FNAL

- 	Jabbering with Kevin Hill

## Instant Messaging at FNAL

- Standards based
- _[http://www.jabber.org/](http://www.jabber.org/)_
- XMPP – streaming XML based protocols
- Clients available for many different OS’s
- _[http://www.jabber.org/user/clientlist.php](http://www.jabber.org/user/clientlist.php)_
- JAJC, Exodus, Gaim for Windows
- Gaim, Gabber, Psi for linux
- Interacts with other IM Systems
- 	*Note: Requires installation of a server module, we plan to test AIM interoperability shortly*

## Instant Messaging at FNAL

- Client Configuration information
- Server: *jabber.fnal.gov*
- Use SSL
- Use plain test authentication
- Conference/Group chat server:  *conference.fnal.gov*
- Username and password are the same as your email gateway username and password

## Instant Messaging at FNAL

- Disclaimer
- This is not a production service at this point. We will try and fix problems with the service as soon as possible.
*That said, please open up a helpdesk ticket assigned to csi-help to resolve problems with the jabber server!*
# Presentation: 671573

## Conferencia MinisterialMinisterio de Agricultura y de Ciencia y Técnica de Costa RicaUSDA e IICA

**10 y 11 de mayo de 2004**
**Sede Central del IICA**
**Costa Rica **

**Uso de la ciencia y la Tecnología para el mejoramiento**** de la Competitividad en el Sector Agropecuario****Víctor H. Trucco**

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Siembra Directa y Biotecnología

**Dos cambios de paradigma**

- 1- Productores:  primeros en
- experimentarlas y adoptarlas.

- 2- SD. Cambio de paradigmas respecto del ambiente productivo.

- 3- Biotecnología. Cambio deparadigmas respecto del
- mejoramiento genético.

- 4- Grandes innovaciones
- del siglo XXI.

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Industria Aceitera: Capacidad Instalada y Molienda

**Industria Aceitera: Capacidad Instalada y Molienda**

**	****Capacidad: + 70% **
**95-02 ****	**
**	****Molienda:  + 67%**

## Beneficios de la tecnología Bt 

**Beneficios**** ****de la tecnología Bt**** **

**Reducción de microtoxinas**

**Mayor rendimiento**

## Maíz transgénico en Argentina

**Maíz con resistencia a Lepidópteros**
**Maíz resistente a herbicidas**

**	**

**Maíz transgénico en Argentina**

**Maíz Bt**

**Maíz no transgénico**

## ¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?

## ¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?

**¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?**

## Impactos Tecnológicos sobre la Producción de soja 

**¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?**

## ¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?

- --------------------------------------------------------------

- 78 mill.tn al 2003

- 15.0000 mill. U$S

**¿Qué pasó en Argentina con la Producción Agropecuaria?**

## Consumo per capita de Harinas proteicas 1999·2000

**6.200 mill. de personas**

**1.333 mill.**

**830 mill.**

**1.294 mill.**

**420 mill.**

**380 mill.**

**Consumo per capita de Harinas proteicas 1999·2000**

## “Beneficios para los Argentinos”

- El aumento de producción agrícola, ha significado:
- mayores ingresos de exportaciones
- mayor actividad económica
- abundante oferta de divisas y contención de inflación
- mayores impuestos al Estado
- importante estimulo a la economía del interior
- aumento del empleo ligado al sector agropecuario

**MAYOR SUSTENTABILIDAD DE LA AGRICULTURA**

## Nuestra Visión

**Agricultura es una actividad que cada día requiere más profesionalismo, incorporarción de la ciencia y tecnología; que requiere esfuerzo e implica riesgos empresarios.**** **
**En este marco hemos logrado aumentar la producción con los OGM y que podemos hacer a la agricultura mas sustentable. **** **
**Nuestros campos se cubren de pájaros y zorros, aumenta la materia orgánica que es la vida del suelo y ayuda a mitigar el efecto invernadero; se consume menos combustibles. **** **
**Esto es bueno.  NO SOLO PARA NOSOTROS.**
# Presentation: 676655

## Update onElectrostatic and MagnetostaticAnalysis of Target Region

- ANSYS model results

- R.E. Mischke
- 15 August 2001

## Magl9 (coil 25 cm radius, 99.5 cm half length)

- 0

- .1

- 1.0

- .3

- -.3

- z

- x

- y

- -.1

- .9

- .2

## Mag72 (delete outer turns on coil)

- 0

- .1

- -2.2

- -.5

- .6

- z

- x

- y

- .7

- -2.3

- -.6

## Mag80b (move outer turn in by half spacing)

- 0

- .1

- .1

- -.2

- -.3

-    z (25 cm)

- x (10 cm)

- (6 cm) y

- -.2

- 0

- -.3

## Hot spots with free mesh

## Areas for penetration 

##  with penetration

## magp

- 0

- 0

- 0

- -.4

- -.4

-    z (25 cm)

- x (10 cm)

- (6 cm) y

- -.4

- 0

- -.4

- 400 x 1020 (three volumes with penetration)

## Magnetostatic summary

- Meet design goal of 0.1% uniformity
- 	coil radius: 25 cm, half length: 99.5 cm
- 	outer turn displaced in by 1⁄2 spacing
- Superconducting shield
- 	radius: 40 cm, end cap: 102 cm
- Penetration of shield
- 	minimal effect

## Bulb on HV plate

## Long plate, 30 cm radius

## 35 cm radius

## 40 cm radius

## 4 in HV plate; 35 cm radius

-  S           EFSUM
-    0.0000      13.127
-    3.8200      13.123
-    7.6200      13.120
-    10.820      13.119
-    14.620      13.123
-    18.440      13.128
-    21.590      13.135
-    25.410      13.123
-    29.210      13.112
-     range:       0.1%

## E vs radius; point added

## Shorten fat plate

-  S           EFSUM
-    0.0000      13.140
-    3.8200      13.123
-    7.6200      13.107
-    10.790      13.099
-    14.590      13.123
-    18.410      13.148
-    21.590      13.183
-    25.410      13.122
-    29.210      13.065

## 30 cm radius

## With recess

-    S           EFSUM
-    0.0000      11.809
-    3.7900      11.697
-    7.5800      11.801
-    10.755      11.891
-    14.545      11.627
-    18.335      11.902
-    21.460      11.658
-    25.250      11.546
-    29.040      11.635
-     range        3%

## Modified recess

-  S           EFSUM
-    0.0000      11.858
-    3.7900      11.645
-    7.5800      11.849
-    10.755      12.024
-    14.545      11.495
-    18.335      12.037
-    21.460      12.769
-    25.250      11.043
-    29.040      12.741
-     range        16%

## Thin wall

-  S           EFSUM
-    0.0000      12.474
-    3.7500      12.337
-    7.5000      12.453
-    10.675      12.608
-    14.425      12.210
-    18.175      12.635
-    21.300      14.039
-    25.050      11.613
-    28.800      13.908
-     range       21%