BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 183527

## Quantum size effect on diffusion and growth morphology of Pb/Si(111)T. L. Chan, C. Z. Wang, M. Hupalo, M.Tringides, K. M. HoAmes Laboratory – USDOE & Department of Physics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011

- Quantum size effects (QSE) on the formation and stability of metallic nanostructures on semiconductor surfaces have attracted considerable attention recently. It has been shown that the intriguing and unexpected feature, i.e., formation of metal plateaus or islands of selective heights with flat tops and steep edges on the semiconductor surfaces, observed in the low temperature epitaxial growth of Ag films on GaAs,  Ag islands on Si(111), and particularly Pb islands on Si(111) can be attributed to QSE due to electron confinement in the direction perpendicular to the film surface. Very recently, QSE is also shown to manifest itself in the superconductivity of ultra-thin Pb films. Nevertheless, the kinetics of such intriguing "quantum" growth, even the very basic question of how the islands grow so fast in the low temperature, is still much less understood.
- Using first-principles total energy calculations, we have studied the diffusion barriers of a Pb adatom on a free-standing Pb film as a function of film thickness. We found that the hcp site is the lowest energy location for a Pb adatom on a Pb film, while the fcc site is the saddle point of the diffusion pathway. Diffusion of an adatom on the Pb film has very low barriers (less than 60 meV). A bi-layer oscillation in the diffusion barriers due to quantum size effect(QSE) is observed, with lower barrier on the odd-layered, relatively unstable Pb film. The diffusion barrier difference between the odd- and even-layered film is found to be as large as 40 meV. Such big difference in the diffusion barriers due to QSE can be used to explain the unusual growth morphology of Pb islands on Si(111) surface observed in the STM experiment where growth of a Pb layer on Pb islands with unstable heights starts from the periphery and moves towards the center, while the nucleation of the next layer on stable Pb islands starts near the center of the island.

## Fig. 2 Top:  A schematic diagram illustrating the energy landscape and growth morphology of Pb/Si(111). 

- Fig. 2 Top:  A schematic diagram illustrating the energy landscape and growth morphology of Pb/Si(111).
- Botom:  STM image (330nm x 370nm) with a Pb coverage of 2.7 ML at 180K on Si(111) -phase.  The numbers label the number of Pb layers measured from the Si(111) substrate.

- Fig. 1 (a) The surface energy per 1x1 unit cell of a free-standing Pb(111) film and (b) the diffusion barrier of a Pb adatom on the Pb(111) as the function of film thickness from 3 to 9 atomic layers.

- (a)

- (b)
# Presentation: 157136

## Fire Protection for the Built Environment

- Standards in Trade Workshop
- September 2004
- Conformity Assessment and Ensuring Product Integrity
- Gordon Gillerman
- Conformity Assessment Advisor
- Homeland Security
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- gordon.gillerman@nist.gov

## Roles in Ensuring Product Integrity 

- Manufacturers and Suppliers – Design materials/products for compliance with applicable standards, code compatibility and control production quality
- Conformity Assessment Organizations – Provide confidence of compliance with standards and code compatibility
- Architects – Design structures in accordance with codes and specify compliant materials/products
- Builders – Use compliant materials/products and comply with codes
- Authorities Having Jurisdictions (Inspectors) – Evaluate compliance of structure with codes including verification of compliant materials/products

**Combustible Materials for Use in Air-Handling Spaces (Plenums)**

**UL 2043 -- Fire Test for Heat and Visible Smoke Release for Discrete Product and their Accessories Installed in Air-Handling Spaces **

## Sources of Integrity - Confidence 

- Manufacturer’s and supplier’s reputation
- Architect's and builder’s reputation
- Effective codes and standards
- Product/material certification
- Third party testing
- Surveillance systems
- Code enforcement by Authorities Having Jurisdiction

**Floor Assembly Furnace**

**Roofing Materials**

**Test Standards**
**Fire-Resistance Characteristics**
**UL 790 -- Tests for Fire Resistance of Roof-Covering Materials (ASTM E108/NFPA 256) **
**UL 1256 -- Fire Test of Roof Deck Constructions' Wind Resistance **
**Wind Resistance**
**UL 580 -- Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies **
**UL 997 -- Wind Resistance of Prepared Roof-Covering Materials **
**UL 1897 -- Uplift Tests for Roof-Covering Systems **
**Material/Product Physical Performance Properties**
**UL 55A -- Materials for Built-Up Roof Coverings **
**UL 2218 -- Impact Resistance of Prepared Roof Covering Materials **
**ASTM and other nationally recognized Standards **

## Conformity Assessment 

**Must meet the needs of dual customer sets **
- Consumers, users, builders and Authorities Having Jurisdiction – need confidence that materials and products meet standards
- Manufacturers and suppliers – need efficient and effective conformity assessment services that provide the needed confidence of compliance to their customers and authorities having jurisdiction
- This dual customer set with their different needs makes competence and integrity a significant factor in the choice of conformity assessment providers. Cost, service and timeliness are also considerations.

## Panel Discussion Objectives

**Enhance the understanding of how systems facilitate integrity and confidence in materials’, products’ and structures’ compliance with codes and standards to meet public safety objectives.**
**Have a dialog on the strength and weaknesses of our (China and US) and other systems for achieving the needed integrity and confidence.**
**Identify opportunities to enhance the compatibility of these systems**
# Presentation: 750078

## FSA Assessments:  An opportunity to improve compliance with Title IV Requirements

- Michael Cagle
- Holly Langer-Evans

**Session 13**

## Session Agenda

- Introduction
- Navigation of the FSA Assessments
- Two Scenarios showing how to use the Verification and Fiscal Management Assessments to improve compliance efforts
- Wrap-up

## Session Objectives

**In this session you will learn...**
- Where to find and how to navigate the Assessments
- How to use the Verification Assessment to assist with verification requirements
- How to use the Fiscal Management Assessment to assist with reconciliation activities

## Getting Started With the FSA Assessments

- Instructor Demonstration

## Scenario 1

- Verification Dilemma....

## Introducing the FSA Verification Assessment

- Instructor Demonstration

## Scenario 2

- Fiscal Management Dilemma....

## Introducing the Fiscal Management Assessment

- Instructor Demonstration

## Reconciliation Activity

- Review the Fiscal Worksheet and background information on both the Pell and Perkins funds (Pages 19, 20 and 21).
- Answer questions on Page 22.

## In Summary 

- The more effort you put in to the FSA Assessment process, the more you get out of it
- Financial Aid is a school wide effort
- The Assessments can be used in a variety of ways
- Hyperlinks are very useful
- Complete Assessments related to Audit or Program Review Deficiencies
- Consider Completing two assessments per year

## Next Steps

**Please review Appendix A and B that includes more helpful information about using the FSA Assessments.**
**What Assessments will you begin when you get back to your campus?**

## Technical Assistance

- We appreciate your feedback and comments.  We can be reached at:
- Phone: 206-615-2586
- Fax: 206-615-2508
- Email: _[qualityassurance@ed.gov](mailto:qualityassurance@ed.gov)__ _
# Presentation: 281723

## DOE DeterminationsandState Requirements

- Jean J. Boulin
- Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs

## DOE Responsibility

- Make a determination whether upgraded model codes and Standards will improve the energy efficiency of buildings
- Within one year of model code upgrading
- Standard 90.1 1999, 2001, 2004
- All buildings except residential low rise
- ~January publication
- IECC 2000****, 2003, 2006
- Residential low rise
- 2004 Supplement to the 2003 IECC (July)

## Updating State Codes

- Upon a Positive determination States are required to:
- Consider whether to update its residential building energy codes to meet or exceed the revised residential code
- Certify to DOE that it has held hearing and made a determination as to the appropriateness of updating its residential code
- Certify and demonstrate to DOE that it has updated its commercial building energy code to meet or exceed the revised commercial code
- Certifications are required within 2 years of the determination

## Updating State Codes - Federal Role

- DOE is required to provide technical and financial assistance
- Technical Assistance - Core Tools, Materials and Training
- Update tools that make it easy to demonstrate compliance (designers), and check compliance (code officials) to reflect the revisions in model codes or standards
-  RES*check, *and* *COM*check-EZ, *Package Generator,
- Training courses and User manuals
- Field inspection workbook and video
- Resource center
- Perform economic analyses for use by states in legislative or regulatory process
- Customize tools and materials for individual states

## Updating State Codes - Federal Role

- Technical Assistance
- Training
- Train-the-trainer
- Web based training
- Professional Society training
- Advocacy –
- Building support for code adoption implementation and enforcement
- Web site resources
- Download materials
- Share tools and materials with other states
- Annual workshop – network and share

## Updating State Codes - Federal Role

- Competitive, cost shared, financial assistance
- SEP Special Projects Grants
- Up to $200,000 per state

## Questions?

- Jean J. Boulin
- 	202-586-9870
- 	_[jean.boulin@ee.doe.gov](mailto:jean.boulin@ee.doe.gov)_
# Presentation: 736841

## Slide 1

## Conducting Public Health Outreach, Education and Prevention Through Pharmacies

- Eugene B. Smith, Pharm.D., M.P.H.

## Changes in Pharmacy

- Mail order pharmacy
- Internet
- Technology and automation
- Increased prescription load with chronic disease management
- Increased self care by patients

## Pharmaceutical Care(1990 Hepler and Strand)

- Responsible for outcomes
- Member of the medical care team
- Mutually beneficial exchange with the patient

## Indian Health ServiceStandards of Practice 

- Assure appropriateness of drug therapy
- Verify patient understanding of medications
- Improved medication use systems

## American Public Health Association (APHA) Principles for Pharmaceutical Services 

- Over 1/3 of the patient rights relate to health education

## Health Education Issues (Pharmacy)

- Chronic disease-prevention, detection and monitoring
- Medication errors and adverse drug reactions

## Health Education Issues (Pharmacy - cont)

- Patient non-compliance     (attitude, skills, knowledge)
- Drug information                 (herbal, otc, substance abuse)
- Coordination/continuity of care

## Changes in Pharmacy

- OBRA '90 and patient consultation
- Patient consultation courses taught to 60,000 pharmacists (Pfizer)

## Changes in Pharmacy(cont.)

- Adult immunization programs in pharmacies
- Tennessee pharmacy-county extension agent project

## 
Pharmacist credentials                for primary care

National associations organizing	

- Pharmacist credentials                for primary care
- National associations organizing

- Changes in Pharmacy(cont)

## Pharmacists An Untapped  Resource

- Interactive patient consultation
- Integration with community, culture, and lifestyles

## PHARMACY IS CHANGING 

## Contact Information

- American Pharmaceutical Association (APhA)
- www.aphanet.org
- Mitch Rothholtz
- 1-800-237-2742 x 7549
- _[Mcr@mail.aphanet.org](mailto:Mcr@mail.aphanet.org)_

## Contact Information (cont)

- Schools of Pharmacy
- 	- Jean Schreck
- 	-_[Schreck](mailto:Schreck_99@yahoo.com)__[_99@yahoo.com](mailto:Schreck_99@yahoo.com)_
- National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)
- http://www.nabp.org

## Contact Information (cont)

- Eugene B. Smith, Jr., PharmD, MPH
- Division Director, Pharmacy Services, Navajo Area Indian Health Service
- P.O. Box 9020
- Window Rock, Arizona  86515
- Phone: 520-871-1398
- Fax: 520-871-5896
- Email: esmith@navnaob.navajo.ihs.gov
# Presentation: 223395

## Role of Non-Equilibrium Pinned Layers on the Thermodynamics ofConfined Polymer Blends –  Sanat K. Kumar (Rensselaer Polytechnic) DMR 0413755

- Polymers are very flexible materials which are used widely. However, they are little used in structural applications due to their low modulus. Recent work has shown that the mechanical behavior of these materials can be favorably altered by the addition of trace amounts of a nanofiller. However, the resulting changes in polymer properties are poorly understood, primarily due to the non-uniform spatial distribution of nanoparticles. We show that the thermomechanical properties of “polymer nanocomposites” are quantitatively equivalent to the well-documented case of planar polymer films. We quantify this equivalence by drawing a direct analogy between film thickness and an appropriate experimental interparticle spacing, thus allowing us to use the vast body of literature in the area of thin films to design improved composites. In addition to this important pratical connotation, our results also offer new insights into the role of confinement on the glass transition.

*Nature Materials*, in press.

- (a) TEM slice from a 15weight% SiO2/polystyrene composite.Note the strong
- aggregation of particles. (b) Comparison between glass transition response
- of PS nanocomposite and thin PS films, plots of glass transition shift vs. film
-  thickness. Data from literature on thin films are shown as open circles.
- Filled circles are data from nanocomposites for two different molecular weights.

- (b)

- h (nm)

- Tg

## Education

**Education**
- This grant supports a graduate student pursuing his Ph.D. degree Yuping Xie (2nd year) and one post-doctoral fellow Sudeepto Sen. An undergraduate student (Misha Verma, pictured below) and a high school student (Kayla Richardson) have also been supported as part of this grant.

**Outreach**
**Taught a course on “Nanomaterials” to undergraduate students at RPI **
**Participate in the programs to involve high school students in research programs.**
**Employed two undergraduate women in experimental research.**
**Participate in the development of modules to be employed in the “Molecularium”, a planetarium based set of animated movies designed to expose K-6 students to the world of science.**
# Presentation: 711902

## Pion Production with MARS14

-                   ISS Workshop
-                        BNL
-               December 15, 2005

## The Study2 Target System

- Count all the pions and muons that cross the transverse plane at z=50m.
- For this analysis we select all pions and muons with KE< 0.35 GeV.

## Meson Post-cooling Survival

## Meson KE < 350 MeV at 50m

## Meson KE < 350 MeV at 50m

## Process mesons through Cooling

- Count mesons within
- acceptance of 30π mm

## Post-cooling  30π Acceptance

## Summary

- For Negatives the peak occurs for
-      6 Gev < Proton KE < 11 GeV
- For Positives the peak occurs for
-       9 Gev < Proton KE < 19 GeV
# Presentation: 025548

## Goal:

-   Learn techniques to make meetings more productive and more fun and thereby boost attendance and participation

## Set the Ground Rules:

- Things to consider:
- Responsibility for food
- Beepers and cell phones
- Attendance
- Bringing children
- Side conversations

## A new look at meetings:

- Longer and less frequent

## Resources on meetings, volunteerism and governance:

- _[www.](http://www.boardbuilders.com/)__[boardbuilders](http://www.boardbuilders.com/)__[.com](http://www.boardbuilders.com/)_ for free meetings course on line
- The National Center for Nonprofit Boards 800-883-6262
- Nonprofit World 800-424-7367

## Periodically, evaluate your meetings. Include:

- What was the best thing about this meeting?
- What was the worst thing?
- What would make it better?
- Are there people who should be in the room and aren’t.

## Why have a meeting?

## What are three characteristics of the best meeting you’ve ever been to?

**1. ?????**
**2. ?????**
**3. ?????**

## What are three characteristics of the worst meeting you’ve ever been to?

**1. ??????**
**2. ??????**
**3. ??????**

## Who should be in the room?

## The art of the three part introduction

**1. Name**
**2. What a person does “in real life”**
**3. Role on the board (include brag)**

## How do you get people to attend your meetings?

## Moving to a consent agenda

- advantages and disadvantages

## What should be on your agenda?

## Set the room for comfort and consensus

## What makes people comfortable?

- Music (if appropriate)
- Clear agenda
- Attention to time
- Knowing names
- Food

## The Job of the Chair

- Start and end on time
- Clarify expectations
- Focus on mission
- Make sure all are heard
- Keep meeting focused
- Make sure the difficult questions are asked

## Facilitate the meeting

**This means that if you feel strongly about an issue, turn the facilitation duties over to someone else!!!**

## The Job of the Participant:

**Show up on time**
**Show up prepared**
**Listen**
**Be open**
**Speak up**
**Follow up**
**Ask the hard questions**

## How can you make the mission a part of the meeting?

## How can you bring the board to the mission?

## Giving a report:

- 1. Is this an action item?
- 2. Can it be presented in writing?
- 3. Are there financial implications for the organization?
- 4. Summarize, ask for questions.
- 5. Be concise and brief.

## Handling Dissent:

- Ensure people are heard
- Focus on areas of agreement
- Deal with ideas not personalities
- Remember the playground

## Handling Difficult People:How would you deal with

**A person who talks incessantly**
**A person who is too shy to talk **
**Folks who have side conversation**

## Minutes that make sense:

- Time, date place of meeting
- Name of the chair and the folks in the room
- Motions, including name of proposer and who seconds
- The results of votes
- Summary of reports
- Copies of all documents presented

## What needs to happen after the meeting:

- Call anyone who didn’t attend
- Send out minutes
- Consider highlighting actions items for individual participant
# Presentation: 910310

## BROWN MARSH PROJECT:  TASK II.5

**COASTAL ECOLOGY INSTITUTE**
**SCHOOL OF THE COAST AND ENVIRONMENT**
**LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY**
**BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA**
**01 JULY, 2002**

**BROWN MARSH PROJECT:  TASK II.5**
**PRELIMINARY RESULTS SUMMARY**

## CLIMATE DRIVER DATA BASE CONTAINS MONTHLY PDSI, PRECIPITATION, AND TEMPERATURE FROM 1895 THROUGH 2001 FROM THE CLIMATE DIVISIONS ENCIRCLED BY THE RED LINE

**CLIMATE DRIVER DATA BASE CONTAINS MONTHLY PDSI, PRECIPITATION, AND TEMPERATURE FROM 1895 THROUGH 2001 FROM THE CLIMATE DIVISIONS ENCIRCLED BY THE RED LINE**

## THE GENERAL GULF OF MEXICO PATTERN IS RAINFALL DEFICITS ALONG THE TEXAS COAST, 

**THE GENERAL GULF OF MEXICO PATTERN IS RAINFALL DEFICITS ALONG THE TEXAS COAST, **
**LARGE RAINFALL SURPLUS IN THE NORTH CENTRAL GULF OF MEXICO, AND SMALLER RAINFALL**
** ****SURPLUS IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA**

## Gulf of Mexico Palmer Drought Severity Index

**THE LAST GULF OF MEXICO WIDE SEVERE DROUGHT WAS IN THE MID 1960’S WHICH WAS**
**ABOUT THE SAME LENGTH AND INTENSITY AS THE DROUGHT THAT OCCURRED DURING**
**THE “BROWN MARSH” EVENT.  THERE WAS ALSO A PROLONGED DROUGHT IN THE 1950’S**
**ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT QUITE AS SEVERE IN LOUISIANA**

**Gulf of Mexico Palmer Drought Severity Index**

## Mississippi River Discharge (cms) 

**Coastal Water Level (cm) **

**Grand Terre Salinity (ppt) **

**THE “BROWN MARSH” DROUGHT WAS ALSO CHARACTERIZED BY A LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER **
**DISCHARGE, AND LOWER COASTAL WATER LEVELS FOR A LONGER TIME PERIOD THAN THE**
**DROUGHT DURING THE 1960’S**

**Gulf of Mexico Palmer Drought Severity Index**
# Presentation: 737655

## Propagation Models

- Prediction and Measurements

## Databases

- DBSG5 (Europe and US)

- Mobile measurements in Norway, Telenor

- Height Functions measured in Switzerland

## DBSG5 Database

- 1600 measurements, source Europe
- 6600 measurements, source US
- Frequency from 100 to 3000 MHz

## Precision of DBSG5 Data

## Average Error

**-80**

**-70**

**-60**

**-50**

**-40**

**-30**

**-20**

**-10**

**0**

**10**

**20**

**All**

**0**

**1**

**2**

**3**

**4**

**5**

**6**

**Number of Obstacles**

**Average Error [dB]**

**Epstein SRTM**

**Deygout SRTM**

**Bullington SRTM**

**Epstein DBSG5**

**Deygout DBSG5**

**Bullington DBSG5**

## Average Error

**-40**

**-30**

**-20**

**-10**

**0**

**10**

**20**

**All**

**0**

**1**

**2**

**3**

**4**

**5**

**6**

**Number of Obstacles**

**Average Error [dB]**

**ITU-R P.1546-1 SRTM**

**ITU-R P.526-9 SRTM**

**Longley-Rice SRTM**

**ITU-R P.1546-1 DBSG5**

**ITU-R P.526-9 DBSG5**

**Longley-Rice DBSG5**

## Standard Deviation

## Standard Deviation

## Data from Telenor

- Norway

- Channel 52
- Antennaheight: 2.5 m
- 252‘000 measurements
- Calculation: LS telcom

## Telenor, Norway

## Telenor, Norway

## Telenor, Norway

## Telenor, Norway

## Height Correction

## Height Correction

## Measurements in montaignous Region

- 600 Height functions
- Frequency Band IV and V
- Two Sets of Models:
- Implementation LS telcom
- Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Overall view of a Measurement

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Implementation LS telcom

## Implementation BAKOM/HTI

## Conclusions

- The mean error tends to negative values for many models if number of ostacles increases
- R1546-2 shows constant positive error (no ‚loss of obstacles‘ due to short pathlength and montaignous terrain  extend 16 km?
- Bullington shows constant positive error and has one of the smallest standard deviation
# Presentation: 703219

## TEMPERATURE    DYNAMIC    ALGORITHMS   CONVERT    TEOM    DATA    TO    FRM-LIKE    VALUES 

- 30 DEG. SES TEOMS

- Troost Street KC

- Blair Street St. Louis

- FDMS TEOMS

- Arnold

- Bonneterre

- Eldorado

- Liberty

**For Temperatures Above 288K                         FRM = RT *( .9301)  +  K *( -.04479)  + 11.86****	****	****	****	****	****	****	****             **
**For Temperatures Between 273K(0C) and  288K(15C)   FRM = RT *(1.38)  +  K *( -.336) + 90.77****	****	****	****	****	****	****	****            **
**For Temperatures Below 273K                         FRM = RT * (1.42)  +  K *(.029)   -   9.06**

- FORMULA  SET  FOR   SES  TEOMS

- FORMULA  SET  FOR   FDMS  TEOMS

**For Temperatures Above 293K                           FRM = B****	**
**	****	****	****	****	****	****                                ****For Temperatures Between 271K(-2C)and  293k(20C)     FRM = B -  R*((293-K )/22)****	****	****	****	****	****	****	****                                For Temperatures Below 271K                            FRM = B - R**

- Raw TEOM Value = RT
- Kelvin Temp = K
- Corrected Value = FRM

- Base Value = B
- Reference Value = R
- Kelvin Temp = K
- Corrected Value = FRM

- Author:
-  Stewart Ronald Stockett
-  MDNR
# Presentation: 770767

## Federal Facility Restoration and Reuse Office Program Facts

**The Federal Facility Restoration and Reuse Office (FFRRO) Mission**
- FFRRO's mission is to facilitate faster, more effective, and less costly cleanup and reuse of Federal Facilities.

**Federal Facility Restoration and Reuse Office Program Facts**
***Federal Environmental Cleanups that Put Citizens First***

**National Priorities List (NPL) Information Summary**

***177 Federal Facility NPL Sites****
***(Average Phase of Work by Site)***

***Status of NPL ***
***Federal Facilities***

_**Notes:**_**  ****	****All data from 4/8/2003 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL and Non-NPL Cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facility sites.  **

**141**

**21**

**15**

***NPL Federal Facility Sites ***
***by Agency***

**119**

**6**

**13**

**15**

**24**

** Includes sites Proposed to the NPL, Final, and Deleted from the NPL*

**RCRA Information**

***EI Status for Federal Facilities on the RCRA Cleanup Baseline***
***Total Sites: 157***
*Source: RCRIS 10/31/2002*

**Cleanup Activity at Non-NPL Sites**

***1,842 Federal Facility Non-NPL Sites***

- Other Federal Agencies include:
- COE, EPA, DOI, DOT, FAA, NASA, Natl Guard, SBA, USDA

**11**

**52**

**64**

**24**

**77**

**769**

**972**

**30**

## Federal Facility Restoration and Reuse Office Program Facts

**Federal Facility Restoration and Reuse Office Program Facts**
***Federal Environmental Cleanups that Put Citizens First***

**Community Involvement**

***Technical Assistance Grants (TAGs) and ***
***Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs)/***
***Site-Specific Advisory Board******s ******(SSABs) ***

**Number of Active **
**TAGs and RABs/SSABs**

_**Notes:**_** ****	****All data from 4/8/2003 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL and Non-NPL Cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facility sites.  **

***Time and Cost Avoidance Attributed to EPA Participation ***
***in the Fast Track Cleanup Program (Cumulative Savings)***
***Source:  FFRRO***

*$150 million*
- 150 project years

*$210 million*
- 209 project years

*$250 million*
- 252 project years

*$277 million*
- 296 project years

*$337 million*
- 348 project years

**Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)**

***BRAC Site Parcels where ***
***Finding of Suitability to Transfer/Lease is Completed***
**Cumulative Acreage (in Thousands)**

*Number of Acres*

***Status of the 123 BRAC Sites***
***(39 NPL & 84 Non-NPL)***

**25**

**20**

**67**

**6**

*$344 million*
- 403 project years

**(Total: 122)**

**4**

*$356 million*
- 443 project years

**1**
# Presentation: 703550

## Global Gas Outlook

**Energy Information Administration**
**James.Kendell@eia.doe.gov**

**The Aspen Institute **
**June 28, 2008**
**Aspen, Colorado**

**Global Gas Outlook**

## World and Regional GDP, 2005, andGDP Growth Rates, 2005-2030

**World and Regional GDP, 2005, and****GDP Growth Rates, 2005-2030**

| 56,793 |
| --- |
| 21,323 |
| 13,083 |
| 11,445 |
| 3,563 |
| 3,535 |
|     2,295 |
|    1,550 |

**(billion 2000 dollars)**

**(annual average percent)**

**Source:  EIA, *****International Energy Outlook 2008. Note:  GDP is expressed in purchasing power parity terms.***

##  World Natural Gas Consumption by End-Use Sector, 2005-2030

**Source:  EIA, *****International Energy Outlook 2008***

## Natural Gas Consumption, 2005 and 2030 (Trillion cubic feet)

**Natural Gas Consumption, ****2005 and 2030 ****(Trillion cubic feet)**

**Source:  2005 Data: EIA, International Energy Annual 2005; 2030 Data: *****International Energy Outlook 2008***

**2005**

**2030**

## World Natural Gas Reserves by Geographic Region as of January 1, 2008(Trillion cubic feet)

**Source:  EIA, Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 105, No. 48 (December 24, 2007), pp. 24-25.**

**World Total:**
**6,186 Trillion Cubic Feet**

**World Natural Gas Reserves by Geographic Region as of January 1, 2008****(Trillion cubic feet)**

## Natural Gas Reserves to Production Ratio, 2006 (Years production remaining)

**Natural Gas Reserves to ****Production Ratio, 2006 ****(Years production remaining)**

**Source:  EIA, Office of Energy Markets and End Use**

## World Natural Gas Production (Trillion Cubic Feet)

**Source:  EIA, *****International Energy Outlook 2008***

## Global LNG Imports, 2005 and 2030

**Source: 2005 Data: EIA, Office of Energy Markets and End Use;  2030 Data: *****International Energy Outlook 2008*****. **

**OECD Asia**

**OECD Europe**

**OECD Asia**

**OECD Europe**

**OECD North America**

**Non-OECD Asia**

**Other Non-OECD**

**Global LNG Imports, ****2005 and 2030**

## Key Uncertainties in Natural Gas Forecasting

**Macroeconomic Growth**
**Restrictions on Carbon Emissions**
**World Oil Prices **
**Demand Side Technological Advances**
**Geology **
**Access**
**Production Technology Advances**
**Liquefied Natural Gas**

## James M. Kendell

**Energy Information Administration**
**James.Kendell@eia.doe.gov**

_**Recurring Publications**_**:**
***Annual Energy Outlook 2008*****, April 2008 (early release)**
***Short-Term Energy Outlook*****, monthly**
***International Energy Outlook 2008*****, June 2008 (early release)**
_**Special Reports**_**:**
***U.S. Natural Gas Imports and Exports: Issues and Trends 2006*****, February 2008**
***U.S. Underground Natural Gas Storage Developments: 1998-2005, *****October 2006**
***Estimate of Maximum Underground Working Gas Storage Capacity in the United States: 2007 Update*****,***** *****October 2007 **
# Presentation: 310089

## EMOTIONAL ABUSE

- Extremely damaging to the child’s self-esteem and psychology.
- Results in severe lifelong effects

## TYPES OF EMOTIONAL ABUSE

- Repeatedly making fun, teasing the child
- Calling the child by demeaning names
- Always finding fault, criticizing, belittling, rejecting, blaming, screaming
- Showing no respect, love, nurturing
- Expecting performance far beyond their developmental level

## CHIDREN MOST AT RISK

- Child of  “wrong” sex
- Unwanted child
- Child seen as ugly, stupid, willful, or bad even though he/she is normal

## PHYSICAL INDICATORS OF EMOTIONAL ABUSE

- Speech disorders
- Sickly, sunken, empty facial expressions
- Delays in physical development
- Hyperactive, disruptive behavior
- Failure to thrive
- Habit disorders like biting, rocking, scratching, head banging

## BEHAVIORAL INDICATORS OF EMOTIONAL ABUSE

- Anxiety and unrealistic fears
- Sleep problems, nightmares
- Delay in development
- Conduct and academic problems at school
- Poor relationship with peers
- Depressed, withdrawn, isolated, aloof, indifferent
- Behavioral extremes
- Aggressive/ Passive
- Inappropriate adult-like / infantile, immature childish
- Oppositional, defiant / overly complaint
- Over controlled, rigid / overly impulsive

## MOST HARM DONE BY THOSE THE CHILDS NEEDS/WANTS THE MOST

- PARENTS
- CLOSE RELATIVES
- TEACHERS
- “GOOD” FRIENDS
# Presentation: 120338

## CEBS goals

**Create a ****reference toxicogenomic information**** system of studies on environmental chemicals and stressors and their effects (a public resource for the scientific community).**
**Develop relational and descriptive ****data compendia**** on toxicologically important genes, groups of genes, SNPs, mutants and their attributes across species that are relevant to human health and environmental disease.**
**Support ****hypothesis-driven and discovery research**** in environmental toxicology - and the research needs of risk assessment.**
**Create a vehicle for the evolution of “****systems toxicology****”.**
**Identify ****molecular pathways**** leading to disease**
**Improve ability to ****extrapolate from animal studies**** to probable human effects**
**Provide better ****understanding of gene-environment interactions**** in human disease**

**A high quality public knowledgebase that aims to:**

## CEBS short-term plans:  launch 4Q05

- USING CEBS TODAY.......

## http://cebs.niehs.nih.gov/

**http://cebs.niehs.nih.gov/**

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## To learn about the data

- important!

## important!

## important!

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## annotation (next page)

## Slide 17

## SORT

- VIEW

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## red outlines => changed transcripts

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## CEBS questions?Interested in sharing your data in CEBS?

- contact fostel@niehs.nih.gov

- CEBS is designed to be used both as a public resource and as a public-private resource.
- Users can create a private area in CEBS, upload their data and then
- analyze their own data using CEBS tools, or select data already in CEBS on the same platform, and combine public and private data for analysis.
- To set this up, please contact fostel@niehs.nih.gov
# Presentation: 139309

## 5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart

**Technical Staff**
- 5Burke, Gary 4-1616
- 5Johnston, Allan 4-6425
- Odell, Dorice 3-1057
- Risse, Lori 4-5131
- Snyder, Wendy 3-4050
- White, Mark 3-4173

- .

- Bivins, Gary 3-1888
- Chen, Yuan 3-0940
- Heidecker, Jason 3-7567
- 9Powell, Ed 4-3188
- Roosta, Ramin 4-7385
- Skinner, James 3-4032
- Smith, Ray 3-7547
- Spence, Penelope 4-2246
- Whittington, Kathy 4-8749

**5143: Project Support**
- Harris, Cate 3-7278

**5141: Parts Engineering**** **Sheldon, Doug 3-5113

- Adams, Jack 4-7744
- Brown, Tom 3-6452
- Cooper, Mark 4-6175
- Erginsoy, Ed 4-5750
- Fernandes, Nayla 3-4175
- Fong, Danny 4-8486
- Funaiole, Dennis 4-8556
- Jimenez, Gustavo 4-0681
- Piacentine, Joe 3-7208
- Stanford, Kelly 3-6716

- Gallegos, Manny 3-6819
- 9Gauldin, Robert 4-4836
- Johnson, Sid 4-2298
- 5Leon, Rosa 3-9066
- Okuno, James 4-8625
- Petkov, Mihail 4-1715
- 8Peurifoy, Chris 3-5469
- Ruiz, Ron 4-2184
- Uribe, Jose 4-0322
- Vu, Duc 4-2019
- Weerasinghe, Vidu

**5145: Reliability & Failure**
**Analysis**
- Sadigursky, Michael 4-5573

**5144:Radiation Effects**
- McClure, Steve 4-0482

- Adell, Philippe 4-1637
- Allen, Greg 3-7558
- Becker, Heidi 3-5491
- Edmonds, Larry 4-2778
- Guertin, Steve 3-3895
- Harris, Rick 3-6872
- Irom, Farokh 4-7463
- 1Kenna, AJ 4-0108
- 1King, Michael 4-5571
- Miyahira, Tets 4-2908
- Nguyen, Duc 4-8554
- O’Connor, Mike 4-5595
- Rax, Bernie 4-9799
- Scheick, Leif 4-3272
- 3Selva, Luis 4-5751
- Solario, Joe 3-6815
- 1Swimm, Randy (5132) 3-7244
- Thorbourn, Dennis 4-1830

**5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart**

_**Parts Reps**_
- Ellis, Kristan 4-1636
- Menches, Heidi 4-5902
- Pardiwala, Chandra 3-7250
- Parks, Michael 4-5813
_**Parts Screening**_
_**Coordinator**_
- Island, Denise 3-4144
_**Order Desk**_
- Drake, Debbie 4-6335
- Mayo-Cupples, Linda 4-0721
_**Flight Storekeeper**_
- Dominguez, Alice 4-5425
- Stiebel, Richard 4-5425
_**Assistant**_1Cervantes, Richard 4-2714
- 8Duong, Brian 4-5425
- 8Smith, Janice  4-5425
- 1Gilmore, Wilbert 4-2561
- 1Ko, Marvin 4-4835
- 1Macias, Jason 4-5425
- 1Nowak, James 4-5425
- 1Raff, Will 3-7228
- 1Warwick, Scott 3-0945

**5142: Parts Acquisition**** **
- Chiang, Nancy 4-0949
- Pantaleon, Jose (Lead) 4-1949

*JPL - 67*
- 1*CAT-A - 10*
- 3*APX – 02*
- 5*Principal - 03*
*8**Summer -06*
*9**IEP -02*
*Total – 90*

**Management**
- Schöne, Harald - Manager 3-1736
- Menke, Robert - Deputy Manager 3-7780
- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- .

- 8Amato, Joel 4-8556
- Carrillo, Tracy 4-4183
- 8Conder, Brandon 4-2315
- 3Lau, Jeffrey 4-5570
- Rowe, DiDi 4-5591
- 1Schwadron, Judi 3-9010
- 8Stallman, Lenny 3-6818
- Westgate, Joan 4-9529
- Wilde, Kathie 3-6031
- Wilson, Amy 3-1770

- .

**5147: Administrative Staff**
- Romejko, Mark, 4-0037

- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- [Wilde, Kathie 3-6031]

- [Westgate, Joan 4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- [Westgate, Joan 4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- JS 6/28/2008
# Presentation: 376171

## Stability Requirements   

**XAS at NSLS-II**

***Paul Northrup***
***April 19, 2007***

**Environmental Research**
**and Technology Division**

## EXAFS data requirements

-  1000 eV scan range
-  Data can be influenced by 0.1% change in signal

- Ravel

## EXAFS experiment

-  Ideal experiment not sensitive to stability
-  Uniform sample, energy calibration reference
-  Challenging real-world experiment sensitive to stability
-  Non-uniform sample, no transmitted beam, etc.

- Ravel

## Non-uniform samples

- Low-concentration heterogeneous samples:
-  Beam motion changes signal due to variations in
-  composition
-  matrix
-  particle distribution
-  surface irregularities

## Maximum tolerable beam motion? 

- For random distribution of particles:
-  Function of particle size,
-  Number of particles in beam spot for a given concentration
-  Probability that a certain degree of motion will result in a 0.1% change in signal
-  For 1x1mm beam spot at low concentration:
**	****	****	****5 microns**

## Positional stability requires... 

- 1)  **Aperture** close to sample, overfilled by 10%
- 2)  **Source** stability within 10% of source size and
- divergence
- 3)  **Monochromator** (and optics) output position and angle must be stable over 1000 eV scan

## Energy stability (repeatability) requirements

**XANES Data:  **
-  High-resolution XANES requires stability within
**   ****0.05-0.1 eV**
-  K edges:
- P, Cl, Cr, Mn, As, Se...
-  L edges:
- Cd, Sb, Mo...
-  M edges:
- Yb, Au, Hg, U...

- P K-edge XANES

## Energy stability/repeatability 

- _Is a function of:  _
-  **Source** angular stability (vertical) incident to mono
-  requires 1 microrad
-  **Monochromator** repeatability and angular stability
-  fixed exit position and angle
- _Can be achieved by:  _
-  Beamline monochromator design
-  Appropriate for each source type (Damping Wiggler, 3-pole, Soft Bend)
-  Beamline feedback system (vertical angle/position)
-  For example, NSLS X15B achieves 0.1 eV, 10 micron  stability on less-stable source
# Presentation: 520007

## National Communications System (NCS)A Day in the Life of ESF #2

**COL Mona Grupp,USAR**
**Senior IMA & Liason for DHS**
**Mona.Grupp@dhs.gov**
** ****	****202-282-8392**
** ****	****6 November 2008**

## Agenda

- JFO Work Day
- Job Activities
- What is a JFO Like?
- The Environment
- Questions

## JFO Work Day

**12+ HOUR SHIFTS**
**24 X 7 OPERATIONS**
**COMMUNICATING**
**FLEXIBILITY & PATIENCE**
**PACE OF WORK VARIES**
**      ****a) FAST **
**      ****b) SLOW / LULL    **

## Job Activities

**COLLECT INFORMATION **
**COORDINATION**
**DECONFLICT INFORMATION**
**REPORT DEADLINES**
**LEAN / PLAN FORWARD**
**CONFERENCE CALLS**
**SCHEDULED MEETINGS**

## What is a JFO Like?

**CONGESTED**
**HECTIC / BUSY**
**CHAOTIC**
**SECURE FACILTY**
**EXCITING**

## The Environment

**FACILTY THAT HAS BEEN IDLE **
**      ****a) AN OLD SHOPPING CENTER**
**DEBUG SETUPS AS YOU GO**
**SECURE NETWORK**
**DIRTY NETWORK**
**BILLETING **
**    ****a)  Hotel Some Distance Away From JFO**
**    ****b)  Within the JFO **

**QUESTIONS?**
# Presentation: 476313

## Fit WIC Kids!

- Inter Tribal Council of Arizona
- WIC Program
- October 2001

## How do you feel about working with Preschoolers?

- What would you enjoy about it?
- How would it benefit the children?
- What would the challenges be?

## Goals of Preschooler Activities

- Learn about and enjoy eating foods.
- Learn how to prepare foods.
- Develop listening and comprehension skills.
- Introduce to different types of literature.
- Learn the importance of physical activity.
- Enjoy physical activity.
- Develop family understanding of the division of responsibility in feeding.
- Develop movement skills, hand-eye coordination, etc.

## Preschoolers are Fun!

- They love to learn about things.
- They want to discover the world around them.
- They are full of energy.

## More about preschoolers

- Short attention spans
- Change activities often
- May be uncomfortable joining in
- Keep things low key
- Don’t force them to participate
- Move around a lot
- Don’t expect them to sit perfectly still
- Expect them to stay in their own space

## Getting Started

- Introduce yourself.
- Learn the names of the kids.  Use name tags if you need to.
- Be upbeat, speak enthusiastically, smile a lot
- Set rules

## Setting Some Simple Rules

- Stay in your space.
- Listen to who is talking.
- Play safely.
- Take turns.

## Dealing with Misbehavior

- Tell them the behavior is not allowed.
- If a child continues to misbehave, he should sit out for a few minutes.
- Unacceptable behaviors such as purposely hurting another child should not be tolerated.  The child should be removed from the group.

## Giving Praise

- Acknowledge when children are doing well rather than telling them when they are not.
- Give praise often
- Be specific.
- Say their name and what they are doing that you like.

## Encouraging Participation

- Participate in the activities with the children
- Encourage parents to participate
- Change activities when children seem bored
- Smile and be enthusiastic

## Getting Ready to do Activities

- Space
- Equipment
- Table and chairs
- Toaster oven
- Microwave
- Physical Activity Equipment
- Tape/CD player

- Supplies
- Plates
- Cups
- Recipe Ingredients
- Knives
- Peelers
- Napkins

## Structure of Activities

- Read a book.
- Discuss the book.
- Physical Activity.
- Cooking Time.
- Closing.

## Teaching and Learning can be Fun
# Presentation: 714442

## The Bardeen-Petterson effect and the occurence of retrograde accretion

- Giuseppe Lodato
*IoA - Cambridge*

- Lodato & Pringle, MNRAS, 368, 1196 (2006)

## What are we talking about?

- Alignment between the black hole spin and the angular momentum of its accretion disc
- Combined effect:
- Lense-Thirring precession
- Warp propagation in the disc
- Significant effects on:
- BH spin **direction**
- ...but also BH spin **magnitude**

- Warp radius  100-1000 Rs

## Coupled BH-disc evolution

- The disc

- The hole

## Counter-alignment?

- Scheuer & Feiler (1996): the relative torques always lead to alignment, even for initially almost anti-parallel spin
- King et al. (2005): simple, geometrical picture leads to the conclusion that counter-alignment is possible, if:

- Problems with Scheuer & Feiler

- Assume a steady state: talign>>twarp
- Implicitly assume that Jd>>Jh

## Generalized spreading ring

- Simulate a single accretion event on the BH
- Initially flat ring, inclined w.r.t hole spin
- Allow the hole spin to move in response to the disc torques
- Confirm King et al. results: counter alignment is possible!
- If Jh dominates: counter-aligned during the hole accretion event
- If Jd dominates, initial counter-alignment followed by alignment

- Lodato & Pringle 2006a

## BH spin - disc alignment

## Effects of counter-alignment

- Location of last stable orbit:
- Accretion efficiency
- Shape of X-ray iron lines
- Shape of jets (precession and alignment timescales comparable  106 yrs)
- Accretion history (increased lum., decreased efficiency...)
- Spin history of the hole

- Effects of disc warping

- Enhanced dissipation, accretion rate
- Basic unknown: ratio of 2/1

## Conclusions
# Presentation: 909579

## 5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart

**Technical Staff**
- 5Bell, Bryan 4-0876
- 5Johnston, Allan 4-6425
- Dorice Odell 3-1057
- Snyder, Wendy 3-4050
- White, Mark 3-4173

- .

- Bivins, Gary 3-1888
- Chen, Yuan 3-0940
- Heidecker, Jason 3-7567
- 5Perret, Jonathan 4-5438
- Piacentine, Joe 3-7208
- 1Powell, Ed 4-3188
- Roosta, Ramin 4-7385
- Skinner, James 3-4032
- Smith, Ray 3-7547
- Spence, Penelope 4-2246
- Whittington, Kathy 4-8749

**5143: Project Support**
- Menke, Rob (Acting) 3-7780

**5141: Parts Engineering**** **Sheldon, Doug 3-5113

- 1Adams, Jack 4-7744
- Brown, Tom 3-6452
- Cooper, Mark 4-6175
- Erginsoy, Ed 4-5750
- Fernandes, Nayla 3-4175
- Fong, Danny 4-8486
- Funaiole, Dennis 4-8556
- Harris, Cate 3-7278
- Jimenez, Gustavo 4-0681
- Liang, Sai 4-3070
- Stanford, Kelly 3-6716

- Gallegos, Manny 3-6819
- Johnson, Sid 4-2298
- 5Leon, Rosa 3-9066
- Okuno, James 4-8625
- Petkov, Mihail 4-1715
- Ruiz, Ron 4-2184
- Uribe, Jose 4-0322
- Vu, Duc 4-2019

**5145: Reliability & Failure**
**Analysis**
- Sadigursky, Michael 4-5573

**5144:Radiation Effects**
- McClure, Steve 4-0482

- Adell, Philippe 4-1637
- Allen, Greg 3-7558
- Becker, Heidi 3-5491
- Edmonds, Larry 4-2778
- Elgherfari, Mohamed 3-7525
- Guertin, Steve (LOA) 4-1637
- Harris, Rick 3-6872
- Irom, Farokh 4-7463
- Laird, Jamie 4-6167
- Miyahira, Tets 4-2908
- Nguyen, Duc 4-8554
- O’Connor, Mike 4-5595
- Rax, Bernie 4-9799
- Scheick, Leif 4-3272
- 3Selva, Luis 4-5751
- 1Solario, Joe 3-6815
- 1Swimm, Randy (5132) 3-7244
- Thorbourn, Dennis 4-1830

**5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart**

_**Parts Reps**_
- Ellis, Kristan 4-1636
- Menches, Heidi 4-5902
- Pardiwala, Chandra 3-7250
- Parks, Michael 4-5813
- 1Risse, Lori 4-5131
- 1Zuniga, Luis
_**Parts Screening**_
_**Coordinator**_
- Island, Denise 3-4144
_**Order Desk**_
- Drake, Debbie 4-6335
- 1Fan, Andrew 3-0945
- Mayo-Cupples, Linda 4-0721
_**Flight Storekeeper**_
- 1Dominguez, Alice 4-5425
- 1Lovers, Corey 4-5425
- 1Stiebel, Richard 4-5425
_**Assistant**_1Gilmore, Wilbert
- 1Ko, Marvin 4-4835
- 1Macias, Jason 4-5425
- 1Nowak, James 4-5425
- 1Raff, Will 3-7228
- 1Warwick, Scott

**5142: Parts Acquisition**** **
- Chiang, Nancy 4-0949
- Pantaleon, Jose (Lead) 4-1949

*JPL - 64*
- 1*CAT-A - 20*
- 3*APX – 02*
- 5*Principal - 04*
*8**Summer -00*
*Total – 90*

**Management**
- Schöne, Harald - Manager 3-1736
- Menke, Robert - Deputy Manager 3-7780
- [Heatherton, Ann 4-6246]

- .

- Carrillo, Tracy 4-4183
- 1Cervantes, Richard 4-2714
- 1Heatherton, Ann 4-6246
- 1Islas, Lydia 4-0108
- 3Lau, Jeffrey 4-5570
- Rowe, DiDi 4-5591
- 1Schwadron, Judi 3-9010
- Westgate, Joan 4-9529
- Wilde, Kathie 3-6031
- 1Wilson, Amy 3-1770
- Yang, Flora 3-4737

- .

**5147: Administrative Staff**

- [Schwadron, Judi 3-9010]

- [Wilde, Kathie 3-6031]

- [Westgate, Joan 4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- [Westgate, Joan 4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy 3-1770]

- JS 11/16/2007
# Presentation: 333446

## Field test results on W4: MobilityMargie Schneider

- 6th Meeting of the Washington Group
- Kampala,Uganda
- 10 – 13th October 2006

## Structure of presentation

- Results
- Core vs detailed Questions
- Crosstabulations for core Q by individual detailed Qs (correspondence)
- Analysis by age and sex (Vietnam)
- Separate analysis of
- cognitive data set
- Gambia
- Vietnam
- South Africa

## Core vs detailed Qs: Mobility

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Crosstabulations

## Comments

- ‘Move inside home’ : more severe difficulties than on W3 Mobility.
- ‘unable to do’ for moving inside home mostly ‘no’ on W3 mobility and many opn ‘some’ and ‘a lot’
- 2 different aspects of mobility – moving within a small space vs walking (outside? And for a distance?) and climbing stairs?
- Similar results for ‘moving outside home’

## Walking a long distance

**Better correspondence between responses on Core and detailed question**

## Gambia

##      Good correspondence between responses on W3 and   

-      Good correspondence between responses on W3 and
-      those on all four questions.
-     For walk long distance and use of hands/fingers there
-      is a trend to use adjacent response categories as
-      frequently.

## Comments on Vietnam

- Good (but not very good) correspondence between W3 mobility responses and detailed question responses
- Unable on detailed = ‘a lot’ on W3
- ‘A lot’ on detailed = ‘some’ on W3
- Additional Qs: (excl. inside, outside, long distance)
- Stoop, crouch, kneel
- Set for 2 hrs
- Stand for 2 hrs
- Walk 400 m
- Walk ten steps

## Vietnam Mobility by age

**Vietnam Mobility by age**

## Vietnam Mobility by sex