# Presentation: 063671

## Slide 1

## SAFETEA Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003

## Key Messages:

- Built upon Safer, Simpler, Smarter theme
- Improves highway safety and helps grow the Nation’s economy without costly new taxes
- Helps ensure transportation projects are completed on time and within budget, while protecting the environment
- Retains overall program structure while increasing flexibility by eliminating most discretionary programs

## Surface Reauthorization

- 6-year, $247 B for highway, safety and transit; continues highway funding guarantees
- Builds upon Secretary’s principles and decisions revealed in February’s FY04 Budget Plan
**Highways:** Strong funding for core Federal-aid, including Federal Lands, Research

## Surface Reauthorization

**Transit:** Restructures programs into urbanized area formula grants, major capital investments, and State-Administered programs
**Freight and Motor carrier:** Freight emphasis, CVISN nationwide deployment
**Finance:**  Bonding, TIFIA, SIBs, and RRIF

## Key Message:  More Than a Spending Plan

- Key blueprint for investment
- Comprehensive safety initiative to save more lives
- Create jobs and sustain economic growth
- Reduce congestion and minimize project delays
- Empower local decision makers by increasing funding flexibility
- Increase environmental stewardship and protections
- Increase transit efficiency for a more seamless transportation network
- Enhance infrastructure investment

## $$$$$$

- Record $201 B for highway and safety programs and nearly $46 B for transit
- Up $29 B from the $218 B of TEA-21
- Lives within the means of HTF revenues
- More than doubles safety - from $3.9 B in TEA-21 to $8.6 B.** **

## Financial Messages

- Revenue levels only increase by growth and capture of ethanol 2.5-cent tax to HTF
- Annual funding levels equal estimated receipts to HTF plus $1 B for IPAM program
- HTF balance brought down to prudent level of about $10 B by FY09

## Financial Messages (cont’d)

- Continues firewalls, guarantees, 90.5% minimum guarantee program, and linkage with receipts
- Greater funding predictability with improved RABA mechanism

**Notes:**
Guaranteed Funding
Extends TEA-21 provisions that guarantee that specified amounts of the authorized funding will be available for obligation each year.  Updates the list of budget accounts included in guaranteed funding to reflect latest budget account structure. [8101, 8102]

Guaranteed funding is made up of two parts: (1) discretionary spending that is protected by firewalls that effectively wall off specified amounts of highway and transit spending from other discretionary spending; and  (2) for the highway program, small amounts of mandatory funding, that is, funding exempt from the obligation limitation (Emergency Relief and $639 million per year of the Minimum Guarantee funding).  

Revenue Aligned Budget Authority (RABA)
Beginning in FY 2006, authorizations for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs funded from the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund will be adjusted (increased or decreased) whenever the highway firewall amount is adjusted to reflect actual receipts and more recent of Highway Account revenue, that is, the budget authority will be aligned with the revenue. [1105, 23 USC 110]

In the case of an increase, a portion of the increase in authorizations is reserved for the Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs allocated by the Secretary of Transportation—programs that are not apportioned by statutory formula.  The amount reserved is determined by calculating the ratio of the authorizations for the allocated programs to total authorizations from the Highway Account of for the Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs and applying this ratio to the additional authorizations.  The resulting amount is divided among the various allocated programs in the same proportion that those programs receive authorizations exclusive of RABA. [23 USC 110]

The remainder of the increased funding is distributed to the State proportional to their shares of Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction apportionments from the Highway Account.  Each State’s share is then divided proportionately among the following programs: Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Surface Transportation Program, Highway Bridge Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. [1105, 23 USC 110]

Should a decrease be necessary, the reduction in authorizations would be applied proportionally to all Highway Account authorizations for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs except Emergency Relief. [1105, 23 USC 110]

## Financial Messages (cont’d)

- Encourages innovative financing via:
- Expanded use of private activity bonds
- TIFIA increases program funding with expanded freight eligibility and lower threshold
- Continuation of SIB Program
- Continuation of the RRIF Program

## A Comprehensive Safety Initiative to Save Lives

- More than doubles funds for highway safety

## A Comprehensive Safety Initiative to Save Lives

- Establishes a new performance-based core highway safety program built on State data driven planning
- Provides incentives to enact primary seat belt laws that will greatly increase use

## A Comprehensive Safety Initiative to Save Lives

- Consolidates, simplifies, and strengthens NHTSA’s existing safety grant programs
- Increases funding to expand and improve commercial vehicle safety and enforcement e.g. tougher auditing of “new entrant” motor carriers

## Environment and PlanningEmpowering Local Decision Makers & Protecting the Environment

- Substantial funding for environmental programs: $62.4 B or roughly 25% of total authorizations over 6 years includes
- $10 B for CMAQ
- $2.2 B for Park/Legacy
- $189 M for Scenic Byways
- $45.8 B Transit

-   $3.6 B for TE
-   $354.6 M Rec Trails
-   $156 M TCSP

## Environment and PlanningEmpowering Local Decision Makers & Protecting the Environment

- New programs & expanded eligibilities to fund mitigation, enhancement, transit, multimodal, intermodal, and to support environmental and planning research, training, and technology transfer
- Responsible approach to environmental decision-making – building upon EO13274

**Notes:**
EO 13274 is the executive order to enhance environmental stewardship and streamline environmental review of transportation infrastructure projects and directs the establishment of a review team to work to streamline environmental reviews of specific, high-impact transportation construction projects.

## Environment and PlanningEmpowering Local Decision Makers & Protecting the Environment

- Selective approach to improving the environmental review process
- Increased delegation of authority to States for environmental reviews
- New standards for reviewing transportation project impacts to historic properties

## Improving efficiency:  Operations and freight movement

- Includes provisions for improved transportation system management and operations throughout SAFETEA
- Promotes nationwide capability to enhance system performance by monitoring real-time traffic and travel conditions on major highways

## Operations and freight movement cont.

- Establishes new Freight Gateways program to facilitate goods movement.
- Creates new NHS set-aside funding for freight intermodal connectors
- Continues strong ITS program, including new performance-based incentive grants, distributed by formula (not discretionary)

## Improves Productivity

- Increasing seatbelt use to 90% would save 6,200 lives a year
- A 1% increase in seatbelt use saves $800 million per year and eliminates 6,400 injuries per year
- Failure to wear seatbelts cost $26 billion in 2000

## Continued Programs

- Interstate Maintenance Program
- National Highway System
- Bridge Program
- Surface Transportation Program
- Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program

## Continued Programs (cont’d)

- Appalachian Development Highway System
- Recreation Trails Program
- Federal Lands Highway Program
- National Scenic Byways Program
- Multi-State Corridor Planning Program
- Highway Use Tax Evasion Projects

## New Programs

- Border Planning, Operations, and Technology Program
- Intelligent Transportation Systems Performance Incentive Program
- Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks Deployment

## New Programs (cont’d)

- Highway Safety Improvement Program
- Preferred Option for Highway Access Near the Executive Office complex
- Infrastructure Performance and Maintenance Program

## New Programs (cont’d)

- Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program [3010(g)]
- New Freedom Program [3031]
- National Park Legacy Project [3037]
- Freight Gateways Program

## New Programs (cont’d)

- General Safety Performance Grants
- Safety Belt Performance Grants

## SAFETEA Principles

- Emphasis on consolidating and expanding Federal safety programs
- Increase funding flexibility for States and local authorities by eliminating most discretionary grant programs

## SAFETEA Principles (cont’d)

- Continues to encourage innovative financing tools
- Simplifies programs and streamlines project approvals and implementation
- Makes transportation programs smarter

## SAFETEA Principles (cont’d)

- Provides efficient environmental stewardship processes that facilitate project delivery without compromising the environment
- Provides strong emphasis on public transportation by simplifying transit programs and fostering a seamless transportation network

## Release

- May 14 Department for media and stakeholders
- May 14 Introduced in House (H.R.2088) and Senate (S.1072) and referred
- Public Website shifted to SAFETEA
- Briefings for Hill and Trades
- Hearings @HT&I, SEPW, Senate Commerce.....

**Notes:**
House committee on transportation and infrastructure
Senate committee on Environment and Public works.

## What Will Happen Over the Coming Months?    Known			          Unknown

- SAFETEA has provoked debate and Senate drafting.
- FHWA provides technical assistance in various forms.
- Legislative process continues.
- TEA-21 expires10/01/03

- ?	How many competing bills will be introduced?
- ?	More Congressional hearings?
- ?	When will we have a reauthorization Act?
- ?	Will it be a 6-year Act?

## Federal Lands Highway Program

## Reauthorization Input

- 24 Focus Meetings
- Written Comments
- Public User Surveys
- Agency Resource Papers

## Agency Resource Papers

- Bureau of Reclamation Roads
- Forest Highways
- Forest Service Public Roads
- Military Installation Roads
- Park Roads and Parkways
- Refuge Roads
- US Army Corps of Engineers
- Bureau of Indian Affairs
- Bureau of Land Management

## Highway Program 

- Continues the program
- Increases funding level by 30%
- Changes program structure
- Expands uses of program funds

## Program Structure 

- Continues the Forest Highway, Indian Reservation Roads, Park Road and Parkways, and Refuge Roads funding categories
- Discontinues Public Lands Discretionary funding category
- Adds Safety and Recreation Roads categories

## Program Structure

- Federal Share Payable
- Obligation Limitation
- Funding Transfers
- Contracts and Agreements

**Notes:**
Federal Share Payable
Expands the ability of Federal land managing agencies to pay the non-Federal share of any Federal-aid project funded under 23 U.S.C. 104 to all title 23 Federal-aid highway programs and the Federal transit program funded under Chapter 53 of title 49 by using their own appropriated funds or FLHP funds. [1804(b)]

Obligation Limitation
Continues TEA-21 provisions as follows:
      FLHP funds are subject to the overall Federal-aid obligation limitation each year.
      Program will receive obligational authority equal to the authorization level. Gets rid of the Lop-off
      Full obligation limitation is provided for future fiscal year carryover FLHP funds.  [1102(c)(2)]

Funding Transfers
Allows direct transfers of apportioned funds to Federal agencies, including the Federal Lands Highways Program, upon State request. Money changes color

Contracts and Agreements
Allows FLHP to enter into contracts and agreements with States, civil subdivisions of States, and Tribal Governments.

## Definitions

- New definition for “public lands highway” added by TEA-21 has been changed to align with current Federal land terms
- Old definition for “public lands highways” deleted
- Definition for “federal lands highway” changed

## Funding Summary

|  | Avg. TEA-21 | Avg. SAFETEA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Park Road & Parkways | $ 165 M | $ 315 M |
| Indian Reservation Roads | $ 275 M | $ 333 M |
| Public Lands Discretionary | $  84 M |  |
| Forest Highway | $ 162 M | $ 200 M |
| Refuge Roads | $  20 M | $  30 M |
| Recreation Roads |  | $  50 M |
| Safety |  | $  40 M |
| Total | $706 M | $ 968 M |

## Forest Highways 

## Forest Highways 

- Continues the funding category
- Provides $200 million for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009
- Funding level increases by 23%

**Notes:**
Forest Highway Program -- No changes proposed to program procedures, project selection, use of funds or forest highway definition. 

## Forest Highways (cont’d)

- No changes proposed to program procedures, project selection,  use of funds or forest highway definition
- The definition for “forest development roads and trails” changed to align with terms used by the Forest Service
- A definition for “Public Forest Service Road” added

**Notes:**
Definitions

## Indian Reservation Roads

## Indian Reservation Roads 

- Continues the funding category
- Provides $333 million for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009
- Increases funding level by 21%
- No changes to project selection  and the Indian reservation road definition

## Indian Reservation Roads (cont’d)

- Revises the date on which the new IRR fund distribution formula regulation is published from April 1999 to April 2004
- Revises the year in which the new formula is implemented from October 1999 to October 2004

## Indian Reservation Roads (cont’d)

- Allows the use of IRR Bridge funds to be used for design as well as construction
- Clarifies that tribes can only request that Chapter 2 and emergency relief funds in Title 23 be contracted under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act

**Notes:**
However with the direct transfer language, transferred money becomes IRR funds and then is eligible for 638 contracting

## Indian Reservation Roads (cont’d)

- Clarifies that an approved IRR Transportation Improvement Program is needed before entering into contracts or agreements under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act

## Park Roads and Parkway

## Park Roads and Parkways 

- Continues the funding category
- Provides $300 million for fiscal year 2004, $310 million for fiscal year 2005, $320 millions for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009
- Increases funding level by 89%

**Notes:**
Program increases are in alignment with the President’s goal to fix roads within National Parks. 

## Refuge Roads

## Refuge Roads 

- Continues the funding category
- Provides $30 million for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009
- Increases funding level by 50%

## Refuge Roads (cont’d)

- No changes proposed to program procedures, project selection, or the definition for “refuge road”
- Refuge roads would be exempt from 4(f)

## Refuge Roads (cont’d)

- Expands the use of refuge road funds to include:
- Interpretive signage
- Maintenance of FWS owned public roads in national fish hatcheries
- Improvement of recreational trails
- Funding used for trails would be limited to 5 percent of available funding per year

## Recreation Roads

## Recreation Roads

- New funding category, new definition added
- Provide $ 50M/yr for FY 2004-2009
- Provides funding for US government owned public roads that provide access to museums, lakes, reservoirs, visitors centers, gateways to major wilderness areas, public use areas, recreation and historic sites

## Recreation Roads (cont’d)

- Recreation Road funds would be allocated to five agencies as follows:
-  6% to Bureau of Reclamation,
-  6% to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
- 10% to Bureau of Land Management,
- 10% to Military Traffic Management Command, and
- 68% to Forest Service

## Recreation Roads (cont’d)

- The Secretary, from time to time, may adjust the percentage of recreation road funds to each agency
- Adjustments would be based on the outputs of agency management systems, other need analyses/or studies, and the use of previously allocated recreation road funds

## Recreation RoadsFunding Use

- Maintenance or improvements of existing recreation roads
- Transportation planning and administrative costs associated with such maintenance and improvements

## Recreation RoadsFunding Use (cont’d)

- Recreation road funds allocated to projects and activities according to the relative needs of each area served by these roads As indicated in the approved 3-year transportation improvement programs for each agency

## Recreation RoadsFunding Use (cont’d)

- For maintenance and improvements to:
- adjacent vehicular parking areas
- interpretive signage
- provision for pedestrians and bicycles
- construction and reconstruction of roadside rest areas including sanitary and water facilities

## Recreation RoadsFunding Use (cont’d)

- Prohibits the use of Recreation Roads funds for the design or construction of new recreation roads
- Recreation Road funds allocated to the Bureau of Reclamation would be exempted from the cost-share requirements of P.L. 89-72, the Federal Water Recreation Act

## Recreation Roads (cont’d)

- Recreation Road projects addressed in the land use management plan for the Federal area would not require any additional environmental reviews or assessments if there are no significant changes to the environmental concerns and no significant new information

## Safety

**Safety**

**Notes:**
Continues many of the safety initiative of ISTEA and previous Acts
+  FHWA strong involvement in infrastructure safety
+  NHTSA emphasis in driver, vehicle safety
+  0.08 BAC Grant funding
     Utah to receive $1.2 million for FY 98;  announced September 3, 1998
     One of 15 states eligible
     0.08 per se law on books since August, 1983
     Funds for safety or highway construction
     Formula based on population 75% & public road miles 25%
     100% Federal funding
     Interim final rule out for comment -- closes October 19, 1998
+  Also to receive $220,000 for drunk driving programs
     Utah’s alcohol-related fatality rate of 20.6% is nation’s lowest
     National average just below 40%--almost double Utah’s rate
+  Seat belt usage incentive grants also available beginning FY 99
    Grants based on savings to Federal government from increased usage
+  Also grants for improving timeliness, accuracy of safety data
+  MCSAP restructured to performance based program

## Safety 

- New funding category
- Provides $40 million for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009
- Safety funds allocated to the Bureau of Reclamation are exempted from the cost-share requirements of P.L. 89-72, the Federal Water Recreation Act

## Safety (cont’d)

- Provides dedicated funds for:
- transportation safety improvement projects,
- collection of safety information,
- development and operation of safety management systems,
- transportation planning,
- bridge inspection,
- highway safety education programs,
- other eligible activities in Chapter 4 of title 23

## Safety (cont’d)

- Safety funds would be allocated as follows:
- 10% to Bureau of Reclamation,
- 15% to Bureau of Indian Affairs,
- 15% to Bureau of Land Management,
- 15% to Forest Service,
- 5% to Fish and Wildlife Service,
- 15% to Military Traffic Management Command,
- 15% to National Park Service, and
- 10% to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

## Safety (cont’d)

- The Secretary, from time to time, may adjust the percentage of safety funds allocated to each agency
- Adjustments would be based on the on the outputs of agency management systems, other need analyses/or studies, and the use of previously allocated safety funds

## Emergency Relief 

- Increases the annual funding authorization for emergency relief in 23 U.S.C. 125 from $100 million to $200 million per year

**Notes:**
The increase will help to address the frequently encountered backlog of unmet needs and resulting need for annual supplemental appropriations.

## Transit

- In addition to the Federal Lands Highways program, the following transit programs are proposed:
- Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program [3010(g)]
- National Park Legacy Project [3037]

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program 

- New program
- $10 million per year
- A State administered program to provide grants to Indian tribes

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program (cont’d)

- Grants to Indian tribes to operate, maintain, and establish rural transit programs on reservations or other land under the jurisdiction of the Indian tribes
- State may waive or reduce the local share (20 or 50%) required for these grants

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program (cont’d)

- $9.5 million shall be apportioned to the states based on a ratio equal to the tribal population in each state divided by the total tribal population in all states, as shown by the latest decennial census of population
- Each State may use up to 5 percent for state administration

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program (cont’d)

- Each State develops an allocation plan.  Plans must:
- Be developed in cooperation with Indian tribes,
- Be approved by the Secretary, and
- Provide an appropriate distribution for funding the needs of existing and new Indian Reservation Rural Transit Systems

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program (cont’d)

-  $500,000 shall be available to the Secretary of DOT to provide technical assistance, including best practices and outreach, to the states and tribes through grants, contracts, or other arrangements

## Indian Reservation Rural Transit Program (cont’d)

- Funds apportioned to the states that are not obligated after 4 years shall be reapportioned among the states

## National Park Legacy Project 

- New Program
- $30 million is available for each fiscal year 2005 through 2009, based on need and supported by transportation financial feasibility studies and planning analyses

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Allows the Secretary to make grants to provide transit service to any Federally owned or managed park, refuge, or recreational area that is open to the general public
- Funds can be used to lease equipment and facilities, if it is more cost-effective than purchase or construction

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Participants are:
- a Federal land management agency
- State, tribal, or local governmental authority with jurisdiction over land in the vicinity of the area acting with the consent of the Federal agency, alone or in partnership with a Federal agency or other participant

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Access to jobs, capital transit projects, reverse commute projects, transit enhancement projects (5302)
- Metropolitan planning (5303)
- Statewide planning (5304)

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- The purchase of rolling stock that incorporates clean fuel technology
- The replacement of existing buses clean fuel vehicles

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Deployment of public transportation vehicles that introduce innovative technologies or methods
- Relates to the capital costs of coordinating the Federal agency public transportation systems with other public transportation systems

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Provides a non-motorized transportation system (including the provision of facilities for pedestrians, bicycles, and non-motorized watercraft)
- Provides waterborne access within or in the vicinity of an eligible area

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Any other public transportation project that -
- enhances the environment
- prevents or mitigates an adverse impact on a natural resource
- improves Federal land management agency resource management

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Any other public transportation project that -
- improves visitor mobility and accessibility and the visitor experience
- reduces congestion and pollution (including noise pollution and visual pollution)

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- Any other public transportation project that -
- conserves a natural, historical, or cultural resource (excluding rehabilitation or restoration of a non-transportation facility)

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- No qualified project shall receive more than 12 percent of the total amount made available for any fiscal year
- The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall establish the Federal share to be provided for each project

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- The Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with and in cooperation with the Secretary, shall determine the final selection and funding of an annual program of qualified projects

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, may undertake, or make grants, cooperative agreements, contracts (including agreements with Federal  agencies) or other transactions for research, development, and deployment of new technologies

## National Park Legacy Project (cont’d)

- The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, may transfer the interest in, and control over, all facilities and equipment acquired to a participant for use
- Disposition may be done in accordance with any property management regulations that the Secretary determines to be appropriate

## Environmental Streamlining

- Excludes from Section 4(f) those transportation improvements on Federal lands which enhance the value of the land from a Section 4(f) perspective.
- Refuge roads would be exempt from the 4(f) provision [1604]

## Environmental Streamlining (cont’d)

- A suit requesting judicial review of a permit, license, or approval issued by a Federal agency for a highway construction or public transit project are barred unless it is filed within 180 days after the agency action is taken [1603]

**Notes:**
Establishes a new statute of limitations of 180 days for legal challenges to Federal agency decisions made in connection with the issuance of permits, licenses or approvals for surface transportation projects.

Directs the Secretary and heads of other Federal agencies to presume that the results of the transportation planning process form the basis for environmental reviews, provided that certain conditions are met.  [6001] 

## Environmental Streamlining (cont’d)

- Federal agencies, Indian tribes, as well as States may use both Federal-aid and Federal lands Highway funds for Federal agency environmental reviews to meet time limits  [1602]

**Notes:**
      Includes the USDOT and Federally-recognized Indian tribal governments in the category of affected Federal agencies that may receive funds to help expedite reviews. Also, funds available for the Federal Lands Highway Program may also be used for this purpose.  Clarifies that these funds can be used to expedite individual projects, classes of projects or programs.

## Scenic Byways Program

- Funding increased from $26.5 million to $31.5 million per year [1102]
- Adds the new inclusive term “America’s Byways”  [1605]
- Passing lanes are removed from program eligibility

## Scenic Byways Program (cont’d)

- Eligibility is expanded to include research, technical assistance, marketing and promotion projects and activities
- including the Center for National Scenic Byways in Duluth, Minnesota
- giving priority to partnerships that                                                                   leverage Federal funds

## Scenic Byways Program (cont’d)

- Funding increased from $26.5 million to $31.5 million per year [1102]
- Adds the new inclusive term “America’s Byways”  [1605]
- Passing lanes are removed from program eligibility

## Recreation Trails Program

- Funding increased from $50 million to $60 million per year [1102]
- State Federal share increased to sliding scale share

## Recreation Trails Program (cont’d)

- State Recreational Trails Committees –
- Strengthened to assure enhanced representation and public participation
- Expands concept of 30% minimum motorized and non­motorized funding to the committee membership
- If a State does not meet the committee requirements it is not eligible for funds in the following year

## Recreation Trails Program (cont’d)

- Expands the use of funds to:
- assessment of trail conditions for accessibility and maintenance
- use of trail crews or youth conservation or service corps to perform recreational trails activities

## Recreation Trails Program (cont’d)

- State Recreational Trails Committees –
- Strengthened to assure enhanced representation and public participation
- Expands concept of 30% minimum motorized and non­motorized funding to the committee membership
- If a State does not meet the committee requirements it is not eligible for funds in the following year

## Federal Lands Highway Program 

- Available SAFETEA Material:
- Fact Sheets
- Section 1804 Bill text
- Section-by-Section Analysis
- Title 23 provisions changed by SAFTEA section 1804
- Federal and Indian land Transit provisions

**Notes:**
Section 1804 is the FLHP

## Federal Lands Highway Program

- Key information about the bill as it makes its way from proposed bills to enactment
- Will continue to grow e.g., major bills with side-by-side analyses
- Links to key sites by others as appropriate
_**www.wfl.fha.dot.gov**_
_**www.fhwa.dot.gov/reauthorization/index.htm**_

**Notes:**
Our site will be more FLHP specific