BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 107140

## Unit Objectives

- 1.  Identify the “killers.”
- 2.  Apply techniques for opening airways, controlling bleeding, and treating for shock.
- 3.  Conduct triage under simulated disaster conditions.

## Treatment of Life-Threatening Conditions

- The “Killers”:
- Airway obstruction
- Excessive bleeding
- Shock

## Treatment of Life-Threatening Conditions

- Components of a respiratory system:
- Lung
- Bronchus
- Larynx
- Pharynx
- Nasal Air Passage
- Trachea

## Triage

- Immediate (I)
- Delayed (D)
- Dead (DEAD)

## Triage Pitfalls

- No team plan, organization, or goal
- Indecisive leadership
- Too much focus on one injury
- Treatment (rather than triage) performed
# Presentation: 409441

## "Good leaders are people who have a passion to succeed....  To become successful leaders, we must learn that no matter how good the technology or how shiny the equipment, people-to-people relations get things done in our organizations.  People are the assets that determine our success or failure.  If you are to be a good leader, you have to cultivate your skills in the arena of personal relations."

*General Ronald R. Fogleman*
*Former Chief of Staff, USAF*

- LL6.1.1 - Good Leaders

## ESTEEM NEEDS

- SELF-FULFILL-MENT

- ESTEEM NEEDS

- SOCIAL NEEDS

- SAFETY

- PHYSIOLOGICAL

- LL6.1.2 - Maslow’s Hierarchy

## PHYSIOLOGICAL

- LL6.1.3 - Physiological

## SAFETY

- LL6.1.4 - Safety

## SOCIAL NEEDS

- LL6.1.5 - Social Needs

## ESTEEM NEEDS

- LL6.1.6 - Esteem Needs

## SELF-FULFILLMENT

- Ll6.1.7 - Self-Fulfillment
# Presentation: 806007

## Black Hole Growth by Accretion Smita MathurThe Ohio State University

- PASB, Santa Fe, July 12 2006

##  1. How do BHs grow?
 2. How is BH growth related to their host galaxies?

From studies of low redshift AGNs

-  2. How is BH growth related to their host galaxies?
- From studies of low redshift AGNs

## There is no unique answer:

- Tracks of galaxies on the MBH-σ plane differ with redshift
- At low redshift BHs grow in well formed bulges through local accretion.
- This is consistent with the downsizing of AGN activity.

## Black hole—Bulge Relations & AGNs

- Ferrarese et al 2001
- Gebhardt et al 2001

## Where do NLS1s lie on the MBH-- plane?

- The MBH-- for normal galaxies and broad line Seyfert 1s is _not _followed by the narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxies.
-    Grupe & Mathur 2004_     _

## Are BH masses wrong?

-   No:  Independent methods of BH mass determination give same results:
- BH mass from fits to SEDs. (Mathur et al 2001)
- BH mass from power spectrum analysis (Czerny et al 2001)
- BH mass from H widths

## Are  values Wrong?

- The distribution of
- velocity dispersions of
- BLS1s and NLS1s is
- very similar.

## Problems specific to NLS1s

- FeII subtraction
- [OIII] asymmetry
- ......neither contribute to make FWHM([OIII]) systematically larger for NLS1s.

## Probability of being drawn from the same population is < 0.001

**NLS1s & BLS1s occupy distinct regions of the **
**parameter space:  a robust statistical result**

- Mathur & Grupe 2005b

## Why some NLS1s lie on the M- relation?

- Mathur & Grupe 2005b

- Barth et al 2005

- Mathur & Grupe 2005a

## X is strongly correlated with accretion rate

-    Williams, Mathur & Pogge 2004

## ....Implications

- NLS1s is a mixed bag ...
-                            BUT
-    _Highly accreting AGNs do lie below the M__BH__--____ relation_

- Shen, Vanden Berk & Schneider. 2006

- ...and these are real   measurements!!

## Interpretation

- Black holes grow during accretion phase in well formed bulges.
- Accretion rate highest in the beginning and dwindles as the time goes by.
- BHs approach the MBH-- relation towards the late stages of active life.

- Growing BHs at low-z  will reach  the M- relation in a few Salpeter times.
- Larger (about 108  yr) life times of smaller BHs is again consistent with “Downsizing” results.

## Theoretical Models

- •   BH mass a constant fraction of bulge mass *at all times*.
- Insignificant BH growth during accretion.
- Bulge mass controlled by AGN feedback
- Merger driven BH growth

- Miralda-Escudé & Kollmeier 2003

## High metallicity in nuclear region?

- Mathur 2000

- Fields, Mathur et al. 2005

- At least 5 times solar
- metallicity in Mrk 1044

## Slide 19

- M101: a Scd galaxy---not known to host an AGN

- NGC 4713:  a Sd galaxy--- earlier classified as a LINER

- NGC 3184:  a Scd galaxy.... Not known to host an AGN

- Linda’s files:
- _o = same as M&G
- _f  = using the scale factor
- _a = BH masses from sigma measurements
# Presentation: 732443

## Review of Energy Trends in Sri Lanka: The U.S. Perspective

- Monisha Shah
- June 2002
- EIA/SARI Workshop #2
- Kathmandu, Nepal

## Economic Growth and Energy Demand Growth, 1988 - 1999

**Petroleum (0.9%)**

**Natural Gas (1.7%)**

**Electricity (2.9%)**

**Electricity (6.7%)**

**Petroleum (5.7%)**

- United States

- Sri Lanka

- 5.0% / year

- 3.0% / year

## Sri Lanka Per Capita Energy Demand Indices

## Sri Lanka Energy Demand Trends

-  High growth rate in electricity demand across all sectors of the economy
-  High growth in natural gas demand across all sectors.
- Growth in petroleum demand only in transportation sector.

## Sri Lanka Petroleum Demand per Capita

**Notes:**
U.S. per capita natural gas demand = 76,000 cu feet per year

## Sri Lanka Electricity Demand per Capita

**Notes:**
U.S. per capita natural gas demand = 76,000 cu feet per year

## Appendix: Some Simple Forecasting Models

## A Simple Sri Lanka Demand Model

- Variables:
**Demand** = total annual average demand (physical unit)
**GDP** = real GDP (billion $, 1990 basis)

## Sri Lanka Petroleum DemandRegression Model 

- Demand = 1.96 + 4.59  GDP
- 				N = 20	R2 = 0.91

## Sri Lanka Petroleum Demand (GDP assumed to grow 4.9% per Year)

## Sri Lanka Electricity DemandRegression Model

- Demand = -1373.53 + 489.68  GDP
- 				N = 20	R2 = 0.98

## Sri Lanka Electricity Demand(GDP assumed to grow 4.9% per Year)
# Presentation: 285875

## GNSS 2004

**EUGIN**

- The European Navigation Conference 2004

## The European Navigation Conference 2004 (GNSS 2004)

- 16 – 19 May 2004
- Rotterdam,
- Holland

## GNSS 2004

-  Rotterdam:cultural capital of Europe in2001
-  Show Case of modern architecture
-  Largest port in the World
-  Rotterdam airport, many connections
-  45 min train from Schiphol Airport
- Numerous hotels close by (one hotel with 	internal connection with De Doelen)

## GNSS 2004

-  Starting Sunday 16 May 2004 with 	building up exhibition
-  First registration on Sunday at exhibition 	from 18.00 hrs
-  Icebreaker party on Sunday at exhibition 	space 18.00 – 19.30 hrs

## GNSS 2004

-  The Conference will be opened on 	Monday 17 May, at 09.30 hrs
-  Welcome by Mayor of Rotterdam
-  Chairman EUGIN
-  Minister of Transport of the Netherlands
-  Director Galileo JU
-  US Representative on GPS

## GNSS 2004

- Social Programme:
-  Sunday 16/5, 18.00 – 19.00, icebreaker
-  Monday 17/5 18.00, reception at Town Hall
-  Tuesday 18/5 19.00, Roundtrip through 	Rotterdam Harbour with classical 	Paddle boat with dinner and “events”
-  Partner programme, excursions

## GNSS 2004

-  Call for papers: deadline 20 Feb
-  Website:
- _[WWW.ENC-GNSS2004.COM](http://www.enc-gnss2004.com/)_
-  The Netherlands Institute of Navigation
- looks forward to meet the International                      Navigation Community in Rotterdam at
-   The European Navigation Conference:
-    authors, exhibitors, participants, sponsors
# Presentation: 513346

## Improving Audits to Protect Taxpayers

**Federal Financial Management Conference**
**March 11, 2008**

## Objectives

- Present current issues, risks, and known problems regarding Single Audits as an accountability mechanism for federal programs
- Discuss current actions in process by OMB, AICPA, and GAO intended to address the current issues and what this might mean for grant oversight activities in the future
- Present an oversight model used by National Science Foundation OIG that is designed to deal with the current risks presented by Single Audit Oversight

## Gil Tran – Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Federal Financial Management, OMB 

Mary Foelster, Director, Government Audit Quality Center, American Institute of CPAs

Morgan Aronson, National Single Audit Coordinator, OIG Department of the Interior

Moderator: Jeanette M. Franzel, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, GAO

- Mary Foelster, Director, Government Audit Quality Center, American Institute of CPAs
- Morgan Aronson, National Single Audit Coordinator, OIG Department of the Interior
- Moderator: Jeanette M. Franzel, Director, Financial Management and Assurance, GAO

**Distinguished Panel Members**

## Recent Events 

- July 2007 PCIE Study on Single Audit Quality
- October 2007 Hearing – Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
- Establishment of Federal Workgroups and AICPA task forces
- AGA Partnership project – Leveraging Single Audits
- Ongoing GAO study and evaluation
- Ongoing Congressional interest and expectations

## 

Presentations by Panel Members

- Presentations by Panel Members
# Presentation: 322295

## Lenalidomide Myelodysplastic Syndromes  (Revlimid®, CC-5013, CDC-501)

**Graham Burton, MD**
**Senior Vice President**** Regulatory Affairs ****Celgene Corporation**

## Lenalidomide Clinical DevelopmentLow/Int-1-Risk MDS

*** List A, et al. *****N Engl J Med. *****2005;352:549-557.**

## Lenalidomide Robust Phase 2 Results

**Well-characterized population**
**Low/Int-1-Risk, del 5q patients**
**Conventional cytogenetic testing **
**Largest prospective clinical study of del 5q MDS**
**Significant clinical benefit**
**Durable resolution of refractory anemia (67%)**
**Significant rise in hemoglobin **
**Cytogenetic response and remissions**
**Marrow normalization and improvements**
**Well-characterized, manageable AEs**

## Lenalidomide

**Proposed label:**
**	****Lenalidomide is indicated for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities**

## Presentation Overview

| Preclinical | David Stirling, PhDCelgene Corporation |
| --- | --- |
| MDS Classification and Prognosis | John Bennett, MDUniversity of Rochester |
| Lenalidomide Efficacy | Alan List, MDUniversity of South Florida and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute |
| Lenalidomide Safety
 | Robert Knight, MDCelgene Corporation |
| Study Conclusions | Alan List, MD |
| Close | Graham Burton, MDCelgene Corporation |
| Moderator | Robert DeLap, MDCelgene Corporation |

## External Advisors

| Gordon Dewald, PhD	Professor of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Genetics 	Mayo Clinic |
| --- |
| Janice Gabrilove, MD	Professor of Medicine   Mount Sinai School of Medicine |
| Mildred Christian, PhD	Consultant   Argus International, Inc. |
# Presentation: 733341

## Most Frequent Systemic Infections—Infants

**Pyrexia**

**Viral infection**

**Urinary tract infection**

**Upper respiratory tract infection**

**Tracheitis**

**Tooth abscess**

**Tonsillitis**

**Sinusitis**

**Rhinitis**

**Respiratory tract infection**

**Pneumonia**

**Pharyngitis streptococcal**

**Pharyngitis**

**Otitis media**

**Otitis externa**

**Nasopharyngitis**

**Lower respiratory tract infection**

**Laryngitis**

**Influenza**

**Gastroenteritis viral**

**Gastroenteritis**

**Enterobiasis**

**Ear infection**

**Conjunctivitis**

**Bronchitis**

**Most Frequent Systemic Infections—Infants**

**-4**

**-2**

**0**

**2**

**4**

**IF-**

**Decreased**

**Increased**

**Base as incidence density**
**Elidel n = 495; vehicle n = 193**

**Log Relative Risk (Elidel****®****/vehicle) with 95% CI**

## Adjusted Incidence of Viral Skin InfectionsElidel vs Topical Corticosteroids

|  | Patients, % |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Elidel® 1%n = 328 | Topical corticosteroids
n = 330 | P value† |
| Any viral skin infection  | 7.0 | 8.9 | .598 |
| Herpes simplex | 6.0 | 5.5 | .855 |
| Skin papilloma | 0 | 2.0 | .029 |
| Herpes simplex ophthalmic | 1.0 | 0.3 | .400 |
| Herpes zoster | 0.5 | 0.7 | .883 |
| Herpes simplex dermatitis | 0.7 | 0 | .128 |
| Molluscum contagiosum | 0 | 0.7 | .254 |

**Long-term adult study B308.**
**† ****Log-rank test. Adjusted incidence (Kaplan-Meier estimate) refers to specific incidence at Month 12.**** **
**Topical corticosteroids (triamcinolone 0.1% cream / hydrocortisone 1% cream).**
# Presentation: 182538

## NTSB:  Driver Education Public ForumOctober 29th, 2003

**Governor’s Highway Safety Association**
**Troy E. Costales**
**Oregon Governor’s Highway Safety Representative**

## Background

- State Highway Safety Offices as a partner
- Available Resources
- “Leave No Child Behind” – Really?
- Who is Taking Driver Training?

## Is this an outgrowth of the lack of support for driver education?

This may be the last breath of life for driver education, if we don’t move now we may lose it forever.

GHSA supports graduated licensing, particularly for teens.  

- This may be the last breath of life for driver education, if we don’t move now we may lose it forever.
- GHSA supports graduated licensing, particularly for teens.

**Graduated Driver Licensing****	**

## Reach the new driver up front, avoid the re-training needed when the driver is 30, 40, or 50.

Who may be the de-facto trainer?

Integrated with the GDL is a must.

Someone at the national level must be charged with the lead responsibility.

- Who may be the de-facto trainer?
- Integrated with the GDL is a must.
- Someone at the national level must be charged with the lead responsibility.

**Driver Education of the Future****	**

## In May, Ford and GHSA launched a new public awareness program.

Focus on four driving skills; hazard recognition, vehicle handling, space management, and speed management.

20,000 high schools have received the materials.

- Focus on four driving skills; hazard recognition, vehicle handling, space management, and speed management.
- 20,000 high schools have received the materials.

**Real World Driver Program****	**

## We cannot focus on driver training as a stand-alone program.

NHTSA must take on some of the lead responsibility.

The alternative is not acceptable.

Transportation is now the key to the American Dream.

- NHTSA must take on some of the lead responsibility.
- The alternative is not acceptable.
- Transportation is now the key to the American Dream.

**Conclusions**

## Grandmas Tough Love Bill

## We must change the culture of what it is to be a teen driver in this nation.

**	**

## NTSB:  Driver Education Public ForumOctober 29th, 2003

**Governor’s Highway Safety Association**
**Troy E. Costales**
**Oregon Governor’s Highway Safety Representative**
# Presentation: 022776

## Automated Flash Flood Forecasting Systems

*¿**Fact or Fantasy?*

***International Workshop on Flash Flood Forecasting***
***San Jose, Costa Rica, 13-17 March 2006***
*Session 2: Emerging Technologies*

## Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

## Motivation

- 1976

- 1996

- 1985

- 1972

## Early Prediction & Notification

- Meteorological Support (27 years)
- National Weather Service
- Urban Drainage and Flood Control District*(Private Meteorologist)*
- Local Flood Warning Program
- early notification, forecasting, detection and warning capabilities*(Basin-Specific Flood Warning Plans)*
- EOC Activation
- communications, weather/flood monitoring, early mobilization, coordination

## Our Major Dilemma—Time 

## ALERT Systems

- Automated Local Evaluation in Real-Time

## Automated Flood Detection

- ALERTweatherstation

- ALERT Rain Gage

- ALERTstream gage co-located with USGS river gaging station

- ALERTrain/stream gage

## Typical ALERT Site

## Public and Emergency Services Webservers

## ALERT Mesonet—before the storm

## Real-Time Rainfall & Stream Levels

## Emerging Technologies

- Internet-driven paging & alarming*(push & pull)*
- GIS integration using XML & SVG *(the new Internet language)*
- Multiple data source integration
- Real-time flood inundation mapping
- Build your own custom displays
- Data processing & analysis by others
- Decision support for emergency managers

## Rainfall Rate Alarms

- Automatically disseminatedvia email and text messaging

## Automated Alarm Notificationscell phones/computers/pagers/PDAs

- Automated Alarm Notificationscell phones/computers/pagers/PDAs

## Data Integration

*One-Stop Shopping*

## Rainfall Data Integration

- ALERT Rain Gage Network

- ALERT & CoCoRaHS

## Slide 17

## ¿Automated Forecasting?

*You be the judge...*

## Synchronized Integration

- _Animated Display_
- TITAN modelfrom NCAR
- NWS Radar
- ALERT Rainfall

- Real-time synchronization of surface rainfall measurements, radar imagery and storm track forecasting model output

## Emerging GIS Capabilities

## Integrated Flood Threat Recognition

## Real-Time Hydrologic Models

## Aviso Watch Yellow Alert

- Aviso Watch Yellow.
- Observed water levels. Boulder
- Creek at Boulder Falls (ALERT
- 4393). 9:39:36 AM MST
- Monday, April 18, 2005

**Notes:**
Aviso Watch message for ~ 10 year event. 

## Aviso Watch – 3000cfs Inundation

**Notes:**
Inundation map for ~ 50 year event.
(Inundation map for 10 year event plus 3 inches QPF.)

## Aviso Watch Red Alert

- Aviso Watch Red. Forecast
- Basin-avg precip. Fourmile
- Creek at Long Gulch (Sub12). 09:54:57 AM MST
- Monday, April 18, 2005

**Notes:**
Aviso Watch message for ~ 25 year event

## Aviso Watch – 12,000cfs Inundation

**Notes:**
Inundation map for ~ 100 year event.

## Depth Inundation Zones

## And sometimes we just miss the peak.

## Thank you

- Kevin Stewart, Manager
- Information Services and Flood Warning Program
- Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
- Denver, Colorado
- &
- Chairman, National Hydrologic Warning Council
# Presentation: 391204

## CDF, Early Days and Today

- CDF Collaboration Meeting
- K.Kondo
- October 27, 2005

## Until the First Collision

**1977:**  Met Alvin Tollestrup at  ISABELLE Workshop at BNL.
**1978:**  Proposal to KEK to participate pp collider experiment
-            at  Fermilab.
-              ***- W/Z , -Higgs, -SUSY/Technicolor searches,...***
**1979:**  Approved/Funded by Japanese goverment.
-            US-Japan treaty on the collaboration in HEP made.
**1982:**  DOE approved Fermilab Collider Project.
-            **Basic detector components done by 1984**
-    ***-CTC, -VTPC, -Solenoid, -EM&HAD Calorimeters, -Muon Counters***
-                   **1984 Oct.14  First Collision**

## Asian Collaboratorsin the Run 2 Author List

**Korea****: **
-    Korea Center of HEP
-    Kyungpook , Seoul , SungKyunKwan      12
**Taiwan**
-    Academia Sinica                                        7
**Japan **
-    KEK, Hiroshima, Okayama, Osaka City,
-    Tsukuba, Waseda                                    40
-     ***All of us are grateful to be able to work on the World Best Experiment with the World Best Collaboration.***

## Where CDF stands today ? - TeV4TeV -

-    In the past, important discoveries were made in well established laboratories/accelerators when a new accelerator is just coming along.
**                           ****SAGA of J/psi  Discovery**
-   - Turning period from BNL/SLAC to FNAL -
**Prologue**: A vague bump in mu+mu- mass spectum at a BNL fixed target experiment.
**J/psi Discovery** at BNL/SLAC.
**Epilogue**: confirmed J/psi at E.S. of SLAC.
# Presentation: 404115

## The US INTEGRAL  Public Data Archive

## INTEGRAL Archive Milestones

**July 2004:** The ISDC INTEGRAL Public Data Archive opened with data up to      revolution 66 (5-1-03).
**September 2004:** The US INTEGRAL Public Data Archive at the HEASARC opened.
**January 2005:**  All public data was reprocessed into revision 2 format.
**January 2005:**  New GO and CP data released in revision 2.
**February 2005: ** The US INTEGRAL Public Data Archive at the HEASARC switches over to revision 2 format data.
**March 2005:**  All data available from ISDC in revision 2 format.

## Revision 2 Changes

- The main differences between revision 1 and 2 are:
- a simplified directory and file structure
- the availability of event time stamps in Julian Dates (JD), with corrected  energies, standard good time intervals (GTIs) and deadtime in the science  window datasets
- the event files are now in the standard OGIP format as adopted  for other high-energy missions
- all JD time stamps are now corrected for the various offsets  described in Table 2 and 3 of _[Walter  et al, 2003, A&A 411, L25](http://www.edpsciences.org/articles/aa/full/2003/43/aaINTEGRAL38/aaINTEGRAL38.html)_.
- some optimization of the attitude handling have now been  implemented
- some statistical products created for the purpose of the  instrument monitoring have been removed

## Current Public Data Archive Status

- New public data is available to the community within a few days of its release from the ISDC.  The limiting factor is the low data transfer rate from the ISDC (only a factor of a few better than real time).
- All public data through the latest release (6-17) is currently available from the HEASARC archive.
- Public data releases occur ~monthly with the next releases scheduled for 7-22 and 8-8.

## Accessing the US INTEGRAL Public Data Archive

- The US INTEGRAL Public Data Archive is accessible from the HEASARC via Browse or FTP.
- Accessing the data via Browse is complicated by the large size of the typical observation, 3 days of data = 7-8 GB.
- The HEASARC limit for a tar file is ~3.5 GB ==> the preferred download method is via a wget script created by Browse.
- A detailed description of all the INTEGRAL catalogs available through Browse as well as a detailed cookbook describing the downloading of data and the setting up of a local data repository are available on the GOF website: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/integral/inthp_archive.html

## Archive Usage Statistics

- March:				60.0 GB
- April:				23.5 GB
- May:				  9.8 GB
- June:				36.0 GB
- -------------------------------------------------
- Average:			32.3 GB
# Presentation: 447247

## AVIATION WEATHER FORUM

**Bethesda, Maryland**
**July 25 -26, 2000**

## General Aviation's Training Need

**General Aviation's Training Need**

## GA is not like the airlines

**GA is not like the airlines**

## GA aircraft/pilots are less weather tolerant

**65 weather accidents  - 54 Fatal**
**70% ****VFR into IMC**** (40 fatal acc.).**

## Need more information - Less data

**1-800-Can I Get There**

## Never try to teach a pig to sing.

**You won’t like the results**
**It annoys the pig.**

## Easier to train new pilots?
Or?
Reduce the level of complexity
Simplify and improve utility.

**Or?**
**Reduce the level of complexity**
**Simplify and improve utility.**

**Training attempts to compensate for poorly designed systems**

## Ink Blot Test

**What part of cloud don’t you understand ...**

**Ink Blot Test**

## VFR not recommended

**Legitimate - sometimes**

** ****Over warning - “****cry wolf****”..**

## PIREPs

**Where is the weather?**
**Can I get there?**
**In flight/on the ground. **

## PIREP system - Improvement

**MORE**
**Pireps**
**Dissemination**
**Feedback to NWS**
**Fix the forecast.**

## Training

**Hot stoves work- predictably**
**The weather does not**

## The virtual world

**Training Using Scenarios**

**The virtual world**
**The real world**
**Case studies.**

## Simplify Weather Information

**Teach ****pilots**** to think like ****meteorologists?**
**Teach ****meteorologists**** to think like ****pilots****?**

**Simplify Weather Information**

## ASF’s Role

**1000+ ****free**** weather seminars**
**10,000 ****free**** videotapes in 1999**
**The ****Web site**
**Research****.**

## SIMPLE = SAFE!

**www.aopa.org/asf**
**1-800-USA-AOPA..**
# Presentation: 547722

## Mini-talk slides and plots

- Top dilepton analysis using the lepton + isolated track data sample

## Analysis Review for top dilepton analysis using the lepton + isolated track data sample

**Analysis Review for top dilepton analysis using the lepton + isolated track data sample**

**2 Leptons**
**1 electron or muon**
**1 isolated track**
**	****p****T****>20 GeV**
**|********| < 1**
**+**** Missing Et**
**Missing E****T**** > 25**
**+**** ****≥**** 2 jets**
**|********| < 2**
**E****T****>20**

## Event Selection (Plain Hebrew) 

- Identify lepton leg
- Central muon or electron with Et/pT>20 GeV
- Recluster jets, recalculate Met WRT lepton
- Identify isolated track candidates
- Correct MET for isolated track candidates

- Require MET>25
- Reject events with MET co-linear with jets
- Select highest momentum isolated track
- Reject events with MET parallel or anti-parallel to track
- If track-lepton pair mass is in Z region, require MET>40

## Results of counting experiment

- Opposite sign
- Statistical errors only

**CDF II Preliminary 200 pb****-1**

*Et>20 GeV*
*Pt>20 GeV*

**Based on top cross - section prediction: 6.7pb**

## Systematics

| Source | (%) |
| --- | --- |
| TCL/TPL ID | 10 |
| tl ID | 6 |
| Jet E scale | 10 |
| Diboson MC | 20 |
| DY estimate | 30 |
| Fake | 12 |

*Bkgnd Uncertainty*

| Source | (%) |
| --- | --- |
| TCL/TPL ID | 10 |
| tl ID | 6 |
| Jet E scale | 3 |
| ISR | 1 |
| FSR | 7 |
| PDF | 6 |

*Signal Uncertainty*

**CDF II Preliminary 200 pb****-1**

## Results

**	****LP03: ****σ****tt**** = 7.3 ± 3.4 (stat) ± 1.7 (sys) pb**

- At mt = 175 GeV

**CDF II Preliminary 200 pb****-1**

## “Tight-Tight” Analysis

**This analysis is a strict subset of the lepton+track  analysis.**
- Motivation: by applying tight lepton requirements on the loose lepton leg, we have a smaller acceptance for taus and relatively little background from fakes
- demonstrates the robustness of the analysis with respect to changes in lepton ID and signal and background composition.
- Baseline: S/B ~ 1.6
- With tight requirements: S/B ~ 3.0
- Selection:
- apply tight requirements on the loose lepton leg.

## Tight-Tight Systematics

| Source | (%) |
| --- | --- |
| TCL/TPL ID | 20 |
| tl ID | 6 |
| Jet E scale | 10 |
| Diboson MC | 20 |
| DY estimate | 30 |
| Fake | 19 |

*Bkgnd Uncertainty*

| Source | (%) |
| --- | --- |
| TCL/TPL ID | 20 |
| tl ID | 6 |
| Jet E scale | 3 |
| ISR | 1 |
| FSR | 7 |
| PDF | 6 |

*Signal Uncertainty*

**CDF II Preliminary 200 pb****-1**

## Tight-Tight Results

*Et>20 GeV*
*Pt>20 GeV*

**CDF II Preliminary 200 pb****-1**

- Opposite sign
- Statistical errors only

- At mt = 175 GeV

**Based on top cross - section prediction: 6.7pb**

##  njet distributions

##  njet distributions

## TCL-tl inv.mass - measured

## Met - measured

## Ht - measured

## tl and TCL pt - measured

## TCL-tl inv.mass - predicted

## Met - predicted

## Ht - predicted

## tl and TCL pt - predicted

## Event Display

- Run 153374 Event 2276742

-  CEM TCL, *tl *electron-like
- MET = 58.9 GeV (φ=245o)
-  2 jets

- CEM TCL ET = 72.6 GeV(φ=305o)
*tl* pT = 63 GeV, (φ=320o)
# Presentation: 414801

**Immigration: Where Do we draw the line?**Walk TalkBoiling Springs  High School7 p.m. December 1, 2005**AGENDA**

**The Guiding Principles**
**Points of Action**
**Q&A**
**Conclusions**

## Ronald Reagan said:       “I hope there’s always room for one more.”

- Ronald Reagan said:*       ****“I hope there’s always room for one more.”***

## Or is it time to close our borders?

## Three Guiding Principles

**National Security requires orderly Immigration Process**
**Only citizens get benefits**
**English remains our national language**

## Four Action Points

** ****We must control our borders**
** ****Employers must check Social Security numbers**
** ****We need an effective guest worker program – WITHOUT amnesty**
** ****While clamping down on ****ILLEGAL**** immigration, we must increase ****LEGAL**

## Immigration through history

## Percent of foreign born population
# Presentation: 715650

## SAS INTRANET BANNERS

- Chet Braswell
- Administrator, Security Awareness

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## SAS BANNERS

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## SAS BANNERS

## Slide 27

## SAS BANNERS

- WHOM TO CONTACT:
- Chet Braswell (509) 376-1820
- Cindy Moody-Brock (509) 376-8368
- Denny Sieracki (509) 376-6307

## SAS BANNERS

- CONTACT:
- Chet Braswell (509) 376-1820
# Presentation: 462279

## Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies: Observable-Mass Distribution

- Marcos Lima & Wayne Hu (astro-ph/0503363)
- Motivation
- Bias and Dispersion on Mobs
- Self Calibration

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Motivation

- Cluster counting with, e.g., SPT with photo-z from DES can provide an interesting measurement of dark energy parameters.
- Systematics due to relationship between true cluster mass, M, and (indirectly) measured mass, Mobs, can be important:
- Bias in going from M to Mobs
- Dispersion in the relationship between M and Mobs
- Try to “self-calibrate” survey with more detailed measurements of dn / dMobs

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Bias and dispersion on M→Mobs 

- Mass distribution:
- Assume Gaussian relationship between M and Mobs:
- Assume Mbias and 2lnM change with z but not with M.

- in 20 0.1 z bins up to z=2

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Bias in <n> due to dispersion on Mobs

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Relative importance of bias and dispersion

- Relative importance = -/2

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Self-calibration (1)

- Use measured sample variance of <m> = <n> * V:
- Measure each <m>(z) in 5 0.2-size bins in log10Mobs, instead of just one bin for Mobs > Mobsthreshold

- Isn’t Sij affected also by M→Mobs bias and dispersion?

- bi is cluster bias obtained from
- simulations...

- priors:

- take  ln Mbias(z) = 0,   2lnM(z) = (0.25)2

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Self-calibration (2)

- I don’t quite see how combining (a) free with (b) free one gets (c) free contour

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Self-calibration (3)

- What about the assumption that Mbias and 2lnM do not depend on M?
- Use only two bins:
-                                                                                    and the rest.
- Still recover almost all the improvement.
- They conclude that only the first bin matters. Therefore, as long as the variations of Mbias and 2lnM with M are not very fast, the approximation holds.

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005

## Summary

- For an (SPT+DES)-like survey, using self-calibration (use of variance and binning in ln M) and assuming a power law for the dependency of Mbias with z:
-                  = 0.02, (w=const.) = 0.11
- with priors:

- Journal Club

- 3/22/2005
# Presentation: 146411

## Canadair ChallengerNovember 28, 2004Montrose, Colorado

## Parties to the Investigation

- Federal Aviation Administration
- Air Castle Corporation
- General Electric

## Accredited Representative

- Transportation Safety Board of Canada
- Technical assistance was provided by Transport Canada and Bombardier

## Slide 4

## Background

- Airplane arrived from Van Nuys, California
- Airplane taxied to ramp and parked for about 40 to 45 minutes during wet snow flurries
- Witness observed snow on airplane’s wings
- Lineman noted ice on airplane’s nose landing gear and wheels

## Ground Handling

- Deicing services were available and in progress
- Flight crew did not request deicing services for the airplane
- Flight crew did not conduct tactile examination of wing surfaces

## Passenger Observations

- Slushy clumps of snow slid past window
- Airplane lifted off and climbed about 20 to 50 feet
- Left wing dropped abruptly, then right wing dropped, followed again by the left wing
- Airplane fell straight onto its nose

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Cockpit Voice Recorder

- Airplane equipped with CVR but no FDR
- CVR tape captured about 32 minutes of events up to crash

## Safety Issues

- Flight crew’s failure to follow winter weather operating procedures
- Flight crew’s failure to understand seriousness of winter weather hazards
- Crew resource management deficiencies

## Slide 12
# Presentation: 008353

## MNM Fatal 2008-05

- Machinery Accident
- February 25, 2008 (Wisconsin)
- Sand & Gravel Operation
- Dredge Operator
- 62 years old
- 12 years experience

## Overview

- The victim was fatally injured when the
- track-mounted excavator he was operating
- broke through ice covering a water-filled
- ditch.  He was using the excavator to free a
- dragline frozen to the ice-covered pit floor.

## Slide 3

## Causal Factor

- Management policies, procedures, and
- controls were inadequate and failed to
- ensure that persons could safely
- perform tasks when working in ice
- conditions on the pit floor.

## Best Practices

- When conditions change, examine travelways to evaluate hazards. If the safety of travelways can't be positively determined, do not travel on them.
- In locations where travelways are not clearly distinguishable, install barriers, markers, or other warning devices to aid equipment operators, limit travel of mobile equipment, and inform mobile equipment operators of potential hazards.
- Stop, Look, Analyze, and Manage, SLAM each task to identify all potential hazards. Initiate action to protect yourself when performing every task.
- Wear seat belts when operating self-propelled mobile equipment.
# Presentation: 468921

## Air Traffic Control: Human Performance

- William J. Bramble, Jr., Ph.D.
- Senior HumanPerformance Investigator

**Notes:**
Good morning.

The controller’s post-accident statements indicated that he did not notice the airplane stop short of runway 26, or accelerate down runway 26.  Staff analyzed the controller’s actions in the minutes before the accident to determine how he did not notice these events

[CLICK]

## FAA Policy

- Federal regulations do not require monitoring of taxi and takeoff
- First priority to ensure separation and issue safety alerts
- Secondary priorities depend on controller judgment

## Contextual Factors

- Short taxi
- Only one lighted runway
- Route marked with lighted signs
- Controller had never seensimilar event
- Expected flight crew to call if lost

## Signs of the Flight Crew’s Error

**Signs of the Flight Crew’s Error**

- Tower

## Window of Opportunity

**Window of Opportunity**

- Window of opportunity(50 seconds)

- Tower

## Window of Opportunity

**Window of Opportunity**

- Tower

- Controller performing concurrent tasks
- Scanned runway when issuing takeoff clearance
- Did not notice airplane stop
- Paid more attention to radar tasks

- Window of opportunity(50 seconds)

## Intervening Period

**Intervening Period**

- Tower

- Controller handedoff departure
- Comair taxiedas expected
- Break in active control tasks
- Controller electedto perform anadministrative task

- Intervening period(32 seconds)

## Critical Window

**Critical Window**

- Critical window (28 seconds)

- Tower

- Airplane aligned with runway 26
- Accelerated beyond 103 knots
- Inconsistent with taxi and takeoff clearances

## Monitoring Policy and Training

- Monitoring provides defense against threats to flight safety
- Guidance on duty priorities couldbe improved

## Monitoring Policy and Training

- Potential deficiencies in controller vigilance, judgment, and safety awareness
- April 2007 Safety RecommendationA-07-34
- Require resource management training for controllers

## Consideration of Staffing

- Workload not excessive
- Last radar task completed before critical window
- Controller might still have performed lower-priority task
- Second (radar) controller not likely to have noticed

## Controller Fatigue

- Two hours sleep in 24 hours
- Controller was most likely fatigued
- Fatigue can degrade performance
- Effect of fatigue could not be determined

## Controller Fatigue

- Impact of fatigue oncontroller performance
- April 2007 Safety RecommendationsA-07-30 through -32:
- Revise shift schedules
- Develop fatigue awareness and countermeasures training

## Slide 14
# Presentation: 856280

## ReSS ProjectStatus Report

- Gabriele Garzoglio
- Fermilab CD/CCF

## Current Activities

- CEMon Development: old_classad dialect (gLite) (DONE)
- ReSS Central Services development (Information Gatherer: CEMon to Condor MMS adapter) (DONE)
- Integration and Small scale Testing (DONE)
- Preparing deployment of ReSS to OSG ITB (May 06). GOAL: Production deployment on OSG v0.6.0 (Jul 06?)(.5 FTE for 3 mo)
- Integration of ReSS with FermiGrid. (.2 FTE for 1 mo)
- End to end Deployment for DZero: SAM-Grid integration with OSG (By Aug 06). (.4 FTE for 4 mo)
- Discussing extensions of ReSS for ATLAS and LIGO(.1 FTE for 2 mo)
- Joint document: GLUE schema to OLD classad mapping (ATLAS, DZero, FNAL, UIowa, GLUE) (.05 FTE for 1 mo)

## Future directions (after Aug)

- Production deployment and operations of SAM-Grid / OSG interoperability system(.7 student + .3 supervision for 5 mo)
- Modifications to ReSS for ATLAS, LIGO, et al. (.2 FTE for 4 mo ??)
# Presentation: 832703

## Tracking for Missing ET

**At 10^34 luminosity there is considerable pileup energy.**
**In principle, the tracker can be used to identify energy deposits from extra vertices and subtract it from the calorimeter deposits.**
**In addition, the tracker has good energy resolution. Therefore, it can be used to replace matched energy deposits in the calorimetry with ,ore accurate energy measurements from the tracker.**

## Calorimeter Hits

**Typically at 10^34 luminosity there are ~ 1000 HCAL hits**

## Tracker

**Tracker has ~ 100 reco tracks spread over 13 vertices which are ~ resolved in z since z has a spread of ~ +- 5 cm.**

## Lego Plots

**Calor hits are clustered 3 x 3 in ECAL and HCAL. Tracks are found at the vertex and swum to the HCAL front face. Note the “sweeping” from the barrel. There are ~ 15 % of reco tracks that bend by > 180 degrees in going to HCAL.**

## Missing Energy - Cal

## Cal – Track Matches

**Swim reco track to HCAL and look at 3 x 3 towers centered on swum track. Cut on dE/sigma E from –2 to + 4. Only manage to match ~ 44/105 tracks and 47/175 GeV of ET.**

## Improve Missing ET?

**Reco tracks comprise only 175 GeV of the total 1240 GeV in the calorimeter clusters. Of those only 47 GeV are matched. If matched track is not part of the primary vertex, subtract the calorimeter deposit – reduce pileup. If it is a primary track, replace the calorimeter deposit with the track PT at the vertex – energy flow. **
# Presentation: 757200

## Technical Division Computing

- Technical Division/CIS
- Bob Andree

- Technical Division/CIS

## TD/CIS Numbers

- Totals
- PC’s	       		- 180
- Portables		- 15
- Mac’s 			- 5
- Unix Desktops	- 3
- Printers/Plotters	- 40
- Windows Servers	- 8
- Unix Servers		- 6

- Technical Division/CIS

## TD/CIS Disk Space

- TDSERVER1
- Users/Personnel: 1.2 Terabytes - 668 GB free
- Project/Ideas Team: 203 GB - 128 GB free
- Pcapps/Macapps/Macusers, etc..: 129 GB - 59 GB free
- TDSERVER2
- SQL database/Pro Eng files:  67 GB - 25 GB free
- UNIX
- Tdsu03 (Td DB’s, Unix Home): 80 GB – 10 GB free
- Td-DCS (Drawing Storage): 18 GB – 10 GB free
- Tdsu61 (Ansys Server): 72 GB – 25 GB free

- Technical Division/CIS

## TD Servers

- Windows
- Tdeserver1, Tdserver2, Tdmssrvr1, Tdprint
- User Data, Project Data, Web Page, Printers/Drivers, Databases, Application Data
- UNIX (Solaris and Linux)
**TDSU03, TDSU61, CYBER, Tdcal, WWW-TD, Td-dcs**
- General File Service, Various Mechanical and Magnetic Analysis Computing (batch and interactive), PC to UNIX files (Samba), TD databases, Engineering Document Management (DCS), Central Calendar Service, Web Service
- Terminal Servers
- Tdserver8
- ~75 Users, 26 Capio Workstations, 2000 Workstation Usage

- Technical Division/CIS

## Networking Overview

- Technical Division/CIS

## Networking 

- Fiber to all Remote Buildings and Trailers
- Gigabit Server Network includes Backups
- Fully Switch 10/100 Network, No Shared Ethernet Usage
- Wireless 802.11B (11 Mbits/s) Shared in all ICB/IB Areas

- Technical Division/CIS

## Services Provided

- User Support
- Firefighting hardware & software
- Hardware & software installation
- Purchase recommendation
- Mail Support
- Problem solving
- Key Serving
- Monitoring Software usage
- Web Hosting & Support

- Technical Division/CIS

## Services Provided cont.

- Video Conference Support
- ISDN and IP Based
- Database Support
- Design, Support, Web Interface...
- Printer/Plotter Support
- Purchasing, Installation and Support

- Technical Division/CIS

## Database Support

- TD Charge
- TD Inventory/Post ER/ECO
- Auger Traveler
- Machine Shop
- Maintenance
- Calibration
- CIS Equipment Database

- Tooling
- Lifting Fixtures
- Facility Management
- TD Employee
- Drawing Control System (DCS)

- Technical Division/CIS

## Future Plans

- PC’s & Servers
- Continue to replace old PC’s with new
- ~ 15-20 per year
- Upgrade Servers every 3 years on a rotating basis
- 1 or 2 servers per year
- Increase Disk space every 3 years
- ~ Double the disk space

- Technical Division/CIS

## Future Plans cont.

- Networking
- Switch Upgrades to GB in 2 IB buildings
- Increase Wireless Network to 802.11A (54 Mbit/s)
- Allows for backing up remote workstations
- 5 times faster
- Terminal Server
- Second Terminal Server
- Upgrade/Combine Web Services
- Hardware, Software and Organizational Upgrades

- Technical Division/CIS
# Presentation: 174187

## B.  Decentralized Energy Systems

_**B.  Decentralized Energy Systems**_

## B.  Decentralized Energy Systems contd...

## Cumulative Achievements of Renewable Energy Programmes in India

## RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPLEMENTATION –MAJOR STATES

- INDIA MAP

**Active Wind Sector**

**Active Wind & Hydro Sector**

**Huge Small Hydro Potential**

**Jammu & Kashmir**

**Himachal Pradesh**

**Uttaranchal**

**Arunachal Pradesh**

**Andhra Pradesh**

**Karnataka**

**Gujarat**

**Maharashtra**

**Rajasthan**

_***RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPLEMENTATION –MAJOR STATES***_

**Tamil Nadu**

## WIND POWER 

** ****One of the largest Wind Energy Programmes**** **
** ****The Wind Resource Assessment programme (WRAP) covers 25 States through 1000 wind monitoring and mapping solutions**
** ****WEG’s up to 2000 KW being manufactured within the country  with   some imported components.**
** ****Major  Players****	****	**
**  ****ENERCON**
**  ****SUZLON**
**  ****NEG MICON**
** ****RRB VESTAS**
# Presentation: 193313

## What is the Energy Release Component (ERC)?

**What is the ERC Graph?**
-  Tracks seasonal trend in fire potential in local fuels
-  Provides comparison to average and extreme historical weather conditions, recent active fire seasons, and past large fires
-  Provides an overall picture of fire weather and potential fire behavior conditions in Northwest Montana

**What does the number mean?**
- Daily fire weather forecasts include the current ERC value. Comparing today’s ERC to historical conditions alerts you to today’s fire danger potential. When ERC is high, expect very active fire behavior, and the possibility of large fire growth.

**What is the ****Energy Release Component ****(ERC)?**
- The Energy Release Component (ERC) is an index of how readily fuels will burn, considering weather, fuel load, and long-term drying of fuels.  The ERC is a Fire Danger indicator, used to track seasonal trends in fire conditions, and to establish appropriate firefighter staffing levels.

## What is the Energy Release Component (ERC)?

- Wx Station
- Location

**What is the ERC Graph?**
-  Tracks seasonal trend in fire potential in local fuels
-  Provides comparison to average and extreme historical weather conditions, recent active fire seasons, and past large fires
-  Provides an overall picture of fire weather and potential fire behavior conditions in Northwest Montana

**What does the number mean?**
- Daily fire weather forecasts include the current ERC value. Comparing today’s ERC to historical conditions alerts you to today’s fire danger potential. When ERC is high, expect very active fire behavior, and the possibility of large fire growth.

**What is the ****Energy Release Component ****(ERC)?**
- The Energy Release Component (ERC) is an index of how readily fuels will burn, considering weather, fuel load, and long-term drying of fuels.  The ERC is a Fire Danger indicator, used to track seasonal trends in fire conditions, and to establish appropriate firefighter staffing levels.

## What is the Energy Release Component (ERC)?

- The Energy Release Component (ERC) is an index of how readily fuels will burn, considering weather, fuel load, and long-term drying of fuels.  The ERC is a Fire Danger indicator, used to track seasonal trends in fire conditions, and to establish appropriate firefighter staffing levels.

**What is the ERC Graph?**
-  Tracks seasonal trend in fire potential in local fuels
-  Provides comparison to average and extreme historical weather conditions, recent active fire seasons, and past large fires
-  Provides an overall picture of fire weather and potential fire behavior conditions in Northwest Montana

- W GLACIER WX STATION

- Wx Station
- Location

**What does the number mean?**
- Daily fire weather forecasts include the current ERC value. Comparing today’s ERC to historical conditions alerts you to today’s fire danger potential. When ERC is high, expect very active fire behavior, and the possibility of large fire growth.
# Presentation: 009436

## The LISTSERV GAL Utility

- The LISTSERV Global Address List (GAL) Utility allows users to extract names and email addresses from the NIH Exchange Global Address list. The extracted information is automatically formatted for addition to LISTSERV via the list management web interface.

## Converting Lists from MS Exchange to LISTSERV

- The GAL Utility is ideal for transferring subscribers from an email distribution list on the NIH MS Exchange System to a LISTSERV list. All of the addresses can be extracted in a single operation, saved as a file, then added to a LISTSERV list using LISTSERV's bulk operations feature.

## Extracting Individual Names and Addresses from the GAL

- The LISTSERV GAL Utility can also extract individual addresses. The information can be saved to the user's clipboard, then copied and pasted onto the LISTSERV Account Management page.

## Installation Instructions

- System Requirements:
- Windows 9x, 2000, or NT operating system
- MS Outlook  98 or 2000
- User must have an NIH Exchange account
- Point your web browser or FTP client software to: **ftp://list.nih.gov/pub/LISTSERV_DOC/GalUtility.exe**
- Download the file to your PC. Make sure that Outlook is not running, then double-click the file to install

## Using the LISTSERV GAL Utility

- To begin, click the **ListServ** button on the Outlook toolbar, or select **LISTSERV Utility** from the Outlook **Tools** menu.
- The **LISTSERV Address Book Utility** window will open.

## Bringing Up the Address Book

- Click the **Create List** button, or tab until the button is highlighted, then press enter.
- The Outlook Address Book (GAL) will pop open.

## Selecting Names From the GAL

- To select names or distribution lists from the GAL, type a name in the “Type Name or Select from List” field, or highlight the name in the left window pane.
- When you have highlighted the name(s) or distribution list(s) you want, click the **Names** button, or tab to it and press **ENTER**.
- When finished, click the **OK** button, or tab to it and press **ENTER**.

## Extracting Names and Addresses

- After you press the OK button, the address book will close, and the names you selected will be transferred to the LISTSERV Address Book Utility window.
- If you selected a distribution list, the names of all of the list recipients should be visible.

## Adding a Single Name and Address

- To copy and paste an individual name and address into the LISTSERV Account Management page, press the **Copy to Clipboard** button, or tab to it and press **ENTER**.
- Bring up your browser, log onto the Account Management page for your list, paste the name and address into the “Name & Address” field under “Add a New User to the List,” and click the button to add the user to the list.

## Saving to a File

- To save multiple addresses in a file for use with LISTSERV’s BULK ADD feature, press the **Save to File** button, or tab to it and press **ENTER**.
- Name the file and specify a directory in which to save it.
- The file is ready to import to your LISTSERV list using LISTSERV’s **BULK ADD** feature.