# Presentation: 922900

## Doug Michael
(presented by Stan Wojcicki)
Witherell Fest
Fermilab, July 14, 2005

- (presented by Stan Wojcicki)
- Witherell Fest
- Fermilab, July 14, 2005

- Neutrino Physics at Fermilab

## 70’s: Main Ring used for fundamental measurements on Electro-Weak, QCD and nucleon structure.
80’s: Continued measurements on above topics using Tevatron
90’s: Continuation of above plus observation of interactions producing ’s.
00’s: Oscillation experiments, new low energy cross sections, QCD, nuclear structure measurements.
10’s: Oscillation experiments and more?

- 80’s: Continued measurements on above topics using Tevatron
- 90’s: Continuation of above plus observation of interactions producing ’s.
- 00’s: Oscillation experiments, new low energy cross sections, QCD, nuclear structure measurements.
- 10’s: Oscillation experiments and more?

- Fermilab has a long neutrino tradition

## What is the absolute mass scale of neutrinos?
Is the mass hierarchy normal or inverted?
Do we understand that the current new “paradigm” (3 neutrinos, mass oscillations) is correct?
Is the LSND evidence for oscillation true? Are there sterile neutrino(s)?
How small is 13?
How “maximal” is 23? Is there  symmetry?
Is there CP Violation in the neutrino sector?
Are neutrinos their own anti-particles?

Measurements with Fermilab accelerator complex can answer or contribute at some level to all of these! 

**Is the mass hierarchy normal or inverted?**
**Do we understand that the current new “paradigm” (3 neutrinos, mass oscillations) is correct?**
**Is the LSND evidence for oscillation true? Are there sterile neutrino(s)?**
**How small is ********13****?**
**How “maximal” is ********23****? Is there ******** symmetry?**
**Is there CP Violation in the neutrino sector?**
**Are neutrinos their own anti-particles?**
**Measurements with Fermilab accelerator complex can **_**answer or contribute at some level**_** to all of these! **

- Major Questions (of the moment) in Neutrino Physics

## This situation requires at least 3 independent m2 values if all experiments are correct.

- LSND
- m2 ~ 1eV2
-  ~ 2°

- Atmospheric oscillations
- m2 ~ 2x10-3eV2
-  ~ 45°

- Solar oscillations
- m2 ~ 7x10-5 eV2
-  ~ 32°

- This situation requires at least 3 independent m2 values if all experiments are correct.

## Window on very high energy scales: some grand unified theories favor the normal mass ordering, but other approaches favor the inverted ordering.

- If we establish the inverted ordering, then the next generation of neutrinoless double beta decay experiment can decide whether the neutrino is its own antiparticle.  However, _if the normal ordering is established, a negative result from these experiments will be inconclusive._
- To measure CP violation, we need to resolve the mass ordering, since it affects the measurements of the CP violation effects.

- Importance of the Mass Ordering

## Mini-BooNE

- Two Running Experiments

- _Mini-BooNE_
-    medium baseline
-    check LSND
- _MINOS_
-    long baseline
-     study oscillations in
-      “atmospheric” range

**Mini-BooNE**

## 8 GeV proton beam 

-  (and measuring a lot of other things)

- 8 GeV proton beam
-  1.6 s pulse, ~5 Hz rate from Booster
-  p + Be  mesons
-  Mesons focused by magnetic horn
-  focusing increases  flux by factor of 6
-  both  and anti- running possible and planned
-  Mesons  Decays in flight produce ’s
-  E ~ 700 MeV, L ~ 541 m (L/E ~ 0.77 m/MeV)

## A history of amazing progress by the Booster and Accelerator Division!

**A history of amazing progress by the Booster and Accelerator Division!**

- slow start

- big finish!

- _Still alive with NuMI_

- 56% of the goal!

- Worlds largest sample
- In this energy range!

- As of end of May as shown by Stefanski at the User’s Meeting

## Coming soon to a lecture

**MiniBooNE oscillation sensitivity for 10****21****  p.o.t. (top) and 5 X 10****20**** (bottom) using the energy fit method. Blue (yellow) is LSND’s 90% (99%) CL allowed region**

- Projected Mini-BooNE Sensitivities

**Coming soon to a lecture**
**hall near you!**

##  These are the powerful tools which, with appropriate investment, will allow Fermilab to be the world leader in neutrino measurements in the next decade.

** ****These are the powerful tools which, with appropriate investment, will allow Fermilab to be the world leader in neutrino measurements in the next decade.**
** ****The Main Injector is a rapid cycling accelerator at 120 GeV**** **
** **6 (or more) batches of Booster protons can be accelerated to 120  GeV every 2.0 s.
-  Current NuMI intensity ~2.11013 ppp  every 2-4 sec (>~150 kW)
-  Goal for the end of the year ~2.51013  ppp every 2 s
-  Nominal NuMI design calls for 4.0x1013 ppp every 2 s
-  (2008-9)  expected rate ~3.41020 protons/year
-  Maybe almost double that even before a proton driver? (>600 kW?)
** ****NuMI beamline design (400kW) is sufficiently conservative that it may handle up to 800 kW beam power with modest improvements. Beyond may need more work. Under study.**

** **

** ****Fully optimized spectra for each energy are obtained by moving the target and the 2****nd**** horn **
** ****With a parabolic shaped horn inner conductor, the horn behaves like a lens (p****t**** kick proportional to the distance from the axis), with a focal length proportional to the momentum**

**Far detector event spectra**

**3.8********10****20**** pot/year**

- Sample NuMI Energy Spectra

- MINOS: Precision tests of oscillation models and parameters

**Verify dominant ******************** oscillations**
**See the characteristic oscillation energy dependence**
**Check for any unconventional explanations which would affect the energy spectrum (even partially): neutrino decay, extra dimensions, etc.**
**Set a limit on sterile neutrino contributions with same or different ********m****2****.**
**Precise measurement of the atmospheric *********m*****23****2****: ~10% for 90% CL (3-5% for 1******
**Search for sub-dominant *****************e***************oscillations: 3 ********discovery if they occur about a factor of 2 below the CHOOZ limit**
-  **Measurement of atmospheric neutrino events with neutrino/antineutrino identification**

## Far Detector pHE  beam data

**X angle (horz.)**

**Y angle (vert.)**

**Track angle with respect to beam  direction**

**Neutrino Candidates**

**Cosmics**

**Beam neutrino candidates are within a 10 ********s time interval, as expected by the spill length of the primary proton beam**

**From ~150000 spills in pHE data**

**Time difference (in sec) between neutrino candidates and far spill signal in a ********50 ********s window**

**preliminary**

## How are we doing?

## Short term prognosis

** ****Have already accumulated ~ 1.8********10****19**** pot in LE configuration**
** ****By the end of the year we hopefully will be approaching ~ 1********10****20**** pot (> 100 ************ CC events in 1-10 GeV energy range expected in Far Detector in case of no oscillations) **
** ****comparable data set to K2K**

## Longer term expectations

**Longer term expectations**

**In ~ 5 years **

** ****10% measurement at 90% CL (3-5% 1 ********)**** of atmospheric ********m****2****, good sensitivity for unconventional explanations**
** ****3 ******** sensitivity for non-zero ********13**** if within a factor 2 of the CHOOZ limit**

**3 ******** sensitivity plot**

## The MINERA Detector

- Active segmented scint. detector 5.87 tons.
- ~1 ton each of  nuclear target planes (C, Fe, Pb) upstream.

- MINOS Near Detector used for higher energy forward muon identification and measurement.

## Planned MINERvA Measurements

- Improved understanding of low energy neutrino cross sections for use by precision oscillation experiments
- Axial form factor of the nucleon
- Yet to be accurately measured over a
-       wide Q2 range.
- Resonance production in both NC and CC neutrino interactions
- No statistically significant measurements with 1-5 GeV neutrinos.
- Study of “duality” with neutrinos.
- Coherent pion production
- No statistically significant measurements of  or A-dependence.
- Nuclear effects
- Expect some significant differences for -A vs e/-A nuclear effects.
- Strange Particle Production
- Important backgrounds for proton decay.
- Parton distribution functions
- Measurement of high-x behavior of quarks.
- Generalized parton distributions

## Statistics in neutrino experiments are almost always “barely enough” by definition. In neutrino experiments, the detector itself is usually also the target. The bigger the mass, the more events there are. But nobody is allowed to build more detector than they absolutely need!

No of events =Cross section x Time x  Flux x Target Mass

The number of protons delivered to a target at a given energy is just as important as detector mass.

Pursuit of investments in both detectors and proton intensity are essential for world-leading experiments.

- _No of events =Cross section_ x _Time_ x ___ Flux_ x _Target Mass_
- The number of protons delivered to a target at a given energy is just as important as detector mass.
- Pursuit of investments in both detectors and proton intensity are essential for world-leading experiments.

- Protons: The Never Slaked Thirst of Neutrino Experiments

## The Proton Intensity Plan

- Eric Prebys, Feb. 2005

## Gains of more than a factor of 2 from not having to make antiprotons:

- 11/9 more Booster bunches available  factor of 1.22
- Hide Booster filling time by filling the Recycler (2.2 s cycle time x 1.467s)  factor of 1.50
- Lost time from transferring antiprotons  factor of 1.17
- Total gain = (1.22)(1.50)(1.17) = _**2.14**_
- This translates into 6.5 x 1020 pot/yr
- With a new Proton Driver, into 25 x 1020 pot/yr
- Intermediate scenarios are being investigated

- Post-Collider Proton Intensity

## Physics Goals:

**30 kT: **
**   ****24 kT liquid scintillator **
**   ****6 kT PVC**
**32 cells/extrusion**
**12 extrusions/plane**
**1984 planes **
**Cell dimensions:**
**   ****3.9 cm x 6 cm x 15.7m**
**   ****(0.15 X****0**** thickness)**
**U-shaped 0.8 mm WLS **
**fiber into APD**

- The NOvA Experiment

- _Physics Goals:_
- e appearance with the goal of improving MINOS’s sensitivity by approximately
-  an order of magnitude
- Measurement of the mass ordering
- (Probably - long term) measurement of CP violating phase
- Further improved measurement of “atmospheric” parameters

## To get an order of magnitude improvement over MINOS for   e, NOA

- Reduces background and increases flux by going off axis
- Increases mass by a factor of 6 (while reducing the cost/kiloton by a factor of ~2)
- Improves *e* identification and e/0 discrimination by
- Increasing longitudinal sampling by a factor of 10
-          (1.5 X0 to 0.15 X0)
- Having a “totally active” calorimeter instead of a sampling calorimeter

- How Does NOvA Meet Its Goals?

## Measurement of m322 and sin2(223)

**5-year ******** run **

**5-year ******** run**
**with Proton Driver **

## 3  Sensitivity to 13 0Before and after Proton Driver 

## 3  Sensitivity to 13 0Comparison with T2K 

## 95% CL Resolution of the Mass Ordering

## 95% CL Resolution of the Mass Ordering: Summary

## 3  Determination of CP Violation

## One possible site (~Soudan) has an obvious advantage... the existence of the NuMI beamline. It is perhaps a bit too close for optimal measurements.
Other sites to the west (Homestake and Henderson are perhaps the best distance?) would need a new beamline, perhaps utilizing both 8 GeV and 120 GeV protons. Sites further west would use higher energy beams which has measurement tradeoffs depending on the detector technology.
A very large water or liquid argon detector are the most obvious candidates.
It is pretty clear that this is an important area of investigation for the future.

- Other sites to the west (Homestake and Henderson are perhaps the best distance?) would need a new beamline, perhaps utilizing both 8 GeV and 120 GeV protons. Sites further west would use higher energy beams which has measurement tradeoffs depending on the detector technology.
- A very large water or liquid argon detector are the most obvious candidates.
- It is pretty clear that this is an important area of investigation for the future.

- Aiming a Fermilab beam to
-  a new underground lab (DUSEL)?

##    There are very fundamental and exciting questions which accelerator-based neutrino experiments can answer. These tend to be almost completely complementary to collider physics and some of the exciting low-energy neutrino experiments.
    MINOS and Mini-BooNE are now both well established and running with first world-class results expected within the next year.
    Fermilab is poised to be the unquestioned leader in the field of neutrino physics over the next 20 years, providing unique opportunities for the essential measurements. Probably even mostly consistent with Fermilab as the site for construction of the linear collider. That’ll depend on future budgets as much as anything. I think we should make the case for both and pursue both aggressively.
We need to proceed rapidly with NOvA.
We need to get a proton driver to the point that construction can begin within the next several years. 
Who knows what Mini-BooNE will say... But we need to look very seriously at a new low-energy neutrino program in either case.

-     MINOS and Mini-BooNE are now both well established and running with first world-class results expected within the next year.
-     Fermilab is poised to be the unquestioned leader in the field of neutrino physics over the next 20 years, providing unique opportunities for the essential measurements. Probably even mostly consistent with Fermilab as the site for construction of the linear collider. That’ll depend on future budgets as much as anything. I think we should make the case for both and pursue both aggressively.
- We need to proceed rapidly with NOvA.
- We need to get a proton driver to the point that construction can begin within the next several years.
- Who knows what Mini-BooNE will say... But we need to look very seriously at a new low-energy neutrino program in either case.

- Conclusions

## For those of you not following closely, construction of NuMI was far from a walk in the park. Mike probably didn’t lose quite as much hair as I have recently, but I’m sure he lost a few good clumps over this! His support and his strong personal involvement (especially during crisis times) have been invaluable in bringing the NuMI project to a successful conclusion.
We now have the world’s most intense, most powerful neutrino beam! It will serve us well for many years. It is a facility in which the lab should take great pride and continue to develop its capabilities.
The issue of getting enough protons is extremely important and those of us interested in this physics are very happy to see the start of a program aimed at increase in the proton intensity. It is essential!
The table is set for physics.

- We now have the world’s most intense, most powerful neutrino beam! It will serve us well for many years. It is a facility in which the lab should take great pride and continue to develop its capabilities.
- The issue of getting enough protons is extremely important and those of us interested in this physics are very happy to see the start of a program aimed at increase in the proton intensity. It is essential!
_**The table is set for physics.**_

- Thanks Mike!