# Presentation: 075928

## WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies

**WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies**

** ****Introduction**
** ****View from Europe ****	****- RE**
**     “       “    ****Japan****	****- Yoshi Kuno**
**     “       “    ****US****	****	****- Mike Zisman**
** ****Conclusions from the discussion****	**

## Introduction

**Introduction**

-  Two years since Study II
-  A lot has been done since then
-  Time to start thinking about a third study
-  Much better: world study
-  Europe, Japan and US
-  Parallel session of WG3 devoted to this
-  Views of each region
-  Discussion on how to form world-wide study

## View from.......Europe

**View from.......Europe**

-  No design study so far
-  Work started late 1990s
-  Much achieved
-  Two layouts: CERN (complete)						   RAL (under development)
-  Effort dramatically reduced by CERN budget cuts
-  ECFA task forces re-organised 							****** **European Neutrino Group
-  Very important: rejuvenate EU activities

## Design Study – European View

**Design Study – European View**

-  Fixed by EU Framework 6 programme
-  FP5: 2 Neutrino Factory related bids, both failed
-  FP6: ESGARD formed - coordinated bid for accelerator R&D
-  Two areas of interest: Integrating Activities								Design Studies
-  IA proposal already submitted: LHC upgrade, LC, NF
-  Basically for improving existing infrastructure

- IA ****** **Neutrino Factory, superbeam, beta beam network	HIPPI JRA

## FP6 Design Studies

**FP6 Design Studies**

- EC will contribute to:
-  Feasibility studies – paper studies
-  Technical Preparatory Work – hardware
- On new research infrastructures with a clear European dimension and interest.
- Includes: future facilities of world-wide relevance not	     existing in Europe					     infrastructures constructed outside EU!

## FP6 Design Studies

**FP6 Design Studies**

- Feasibility studies

- Aim: Lay conceptual foundations for new infrastructure
- Methods:
-  Basic feasibility study
-  Explore new fundamental technology
-  Detailed engineering design, particularly most advanced

- TPW

- Includes:
-  Development and testing of critical components, sub-systems, materials or techniques, including software
- Does not include:
-  preparatory work based on existing or proven techniques
-  reproduction of available components or materials

## FP6 Design Studies

**FP6 Design Studies**

- Funding:

-  Total budget: 200M€; 70M€ in first call
-  EC contribution per project ****** **10M€
-  50% matching required(?)

- Timing:

-  Call for proposals:		October 2003
-  Deadline:			Spring 2004
-  Evaluation results:	Summer 2004
-  Contract signatures:	Start 2005

## Design Study Bid

**Design Study Bid**

-  EU will make FP6 Design Study bid
-  Essential to re-build activities in Europe
-  Host laboratory: RAL (possibly!)
-  Much better if part of world-wide design study
-  FP6 allows for/encourages this
-  May also provide some funding
-  Aim: ?DR for a Neutrino Factory ~2009

## View from......Japan

**View from......Japan**

-  Design study published July 2002
-  Little support from KEK management
-  Based on FFAGs

## View from......Japan

**View from......Japan**

## View from......Japan

**View from......Japan**

## View from......Japan

**View from......Japan**

- Staging

- High Power Proton Driver
- Muon g-2
- Muon Factory (PRISM)
- Muon LFV
- Muon Factory-II (PRISM-II)
- Muon EDM
- Neutrino Factory
- Based on 1 MW proton beam
- Neutrino Factory-II
- Based on 4.4 MW proton beam
- Muon Collider

- Physics outcomes
- at each stage

## View from......Japan

**View from......Japan**

-  Would support a world-wide design study
-  Concern expressed about overlap due to FFAGs
-  Would prefer some level of overlap for active		participation
-  Timescale depends on J-PARCnu, LC, etc

**My interpretation of conclusions**

## View from........US

**View from........US**

- Two feasibility studies so far in US
- FS1:

-  Instigated by FNAL director
** **MC invited to participate
-  Focus was on feasibility
-  First attempt to specify NF from end-to-end
-  Design based on (reasonably) well understood 	technology
-  No attempt to optimise cost
-  Cost was a deliverable
-  Feasibility was established
-  Performance poor, costs high

## View from........US

**View from........US**

- FS2:

-  Collaboration between MC and BNL director
** **BNL managers able to draw on resources
-  Goal: maintain feasibility, but improve performance
-  Cost optimisation again given lower priority
-  Performance: 6x Study I
-  Cost: 75% (but only one RLA)
-  Still too high

## View from........US

**View from........US**

- FS3:

-  Need to reduce cost
** **Much progress already:							Neuffer RF phase rotation					FFAG ring or VRCS						Ring coolers
-  Need to look for optimum between					Proton driver							Cooling							Acceleration							Detector
-  But much better if world-wide study
-  Possible host site (MICE): RAL

## Discussion

**Discussion**

- Should there be a world-wide design study?

- Yes

- How should we proceed?

- Create a steering group

- US:		Steve Geer			Bob Palmer**	****	****	**Mike Zisman
- Japan:	Yoshi Kuno			Yoshi Mori			Kenso Nakamura
- Europe:	Alain Blondel(?)		Rob Edgecock		Helmut Haseroth

- What should be included?

- Accelerator and detector

- Name?

- WDS1(?)

## Discussion

**Discussion**

- Timescale?

- Format?

- Host laboratory?

- Aim?

- Etc.....