BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 909736

## FY 2010 PPBE Budget Formulationin FY2008

**FY 2010 PPBE Budget Formulation****in FY2008**

**Feb.**

**March**

**April**

**May**

**June**

**July**

**Aug.**

**Sept.**

**Planning**

**Programming**

**                                                                              ****Budgeting**

**Jan.**

**Nov.**

**FY 08 Oct.**

**Dec.**

- MD Program/Project Reviews

- 4/22-24          MSIR

- 5/23PAA Reviews

- IBPD system open Dec.

- N2 PRG
- 1/16–2/1

- 2/25 – 3/28
- N2 CAS Module

- 2/25 – 5/15
- N2 Program Module

- 9/2-5N2 adj.

- 8/24–30    N2 CAM Adjust

- 8/6 – 8/23
- N2 Center  Update

- 7/17-23
-  PaIG

- Revision G
- 8-20-08

- System Updates

- Decisions

- 9/5- 9/18
- N2 Center  Update

- 8/20-9/2
-  N2 open  HQ

- 9/19-25
-  CAM
- Adj

- 9/26-30
- N2 CFO

- 7/23-31
- Cx, T&R,
- ISS  N2 update

**FY 09 Oct.**

**Nov.**

**Dec. **
# Presentation: 369688

## The “Cycle of Success”

**U.S . Fish & Wildlife Service allocates funds to State fish & wildlife agencies**

**Results: Better fishing, boating,  hunting & wildlife-oriented recreation**

**State fish & wildlife   agencies implement         programs & projects**

**Anglers, hunters, boaters,                                purchase fishing/                                        hunting equipment &                                 motor boat fuels**

**Grants to States**

**Manufacturers pay excise tax on that equipment**

**The “Cycle of Success”**
# Presentation: 245944

## Experimental Global Tropics 

- _Hazards/Benefits Assessment__ __ _

- Update prepared by:
- Climate Prediction Center / NCEP
-    May 21, 2007

## Week 1 Outlook – Valid: May 22-28 2007

**Confidence: High**
**2. **_**The potential exists for tropical cyclogenesis across a small region of the eastern Pacific Ocean west of Central America.**_** **Active convection in the region, enhanced low-level convergence, areas of weak to moderate vertical wind shear, and above average SSTs make the development of a tropical cyclone possible.
**Confidence: Low**
**3. **_**An increased chance for above-average rainfall for sections of the Arabian Sea and western Indian Ocean.**_** **During the past week, convection has increased across the Arabian Sea. The latest data indicate stronger than average cross-equatorial flow from the southern hemisphere and a stronger than average Somali Jet. These factors in addition to the movement of an atmospheric Kelvin wave into the region along with SSTs in the area that are 1°C above average make enhanced rainfall in this region possible.** **
**Confidence: Moderate**
- _OTHER POTENTIAL THREATS:_
- Typhoon Yutu and its remnants will impact waters east of Japan across the northwest Pacific Ocean with high seas and strong winds early in the period.

_***Week 1 Outlook – Valid: May 22-28 2007***_

_**Please note**_**:** Confidence estimates are subjective in nature and are not based on an objective scheme. The estimates are given to provide additional information for the user.

## Week 2 Outlook – Valid: May 29 - June 4 2007

_**Please note**_**:** Confidence estimates are subjective in nature and are not based on an objective scheme. The estimates are given to provide additional information for the user.

**1. **_**An increased chance for above-average rainfall for sections of the eastern Pacific Ocean, Central America, Caribbean Sea, Cuba, Hispaniola, and the Bahamas.**_** **The interaction of** **abundant tropical moisture and low-latitude frontal systems** **are expected to enhance rainfall across the West Indies and sections of the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea mainly early in the period.** **Anomalous low-level convergence, an enhanced and northward shifted Pacific ITCZ, and above average SSTs are expected to enhance rainfall across sections of the eastern Pacific Ocean and Central America.** **
**Confidence: Moderate**
**2. **_**An increased chance for above-average rainfall for sections of southern India, the eastern Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal, and Southeast Asia.**_** **It is anticipated that the Indian monsoon** **will begin early this year**. **With convection increasing across the Arabian Sea and a stronger than average Somali Jet rainfall is expected to be enhanced across sections of southern India. Renewed easterly anomalies across the Maritime continent are expected to enhance rainfall later in the period across eastern areas of the highlighted region.
**Confidence: Moderate**
# Presentation: 682881

## Suspicious Activity Report Filing Trend for the Territory of Puerto RicoFor the Period April 1, 1996 through December 31, 2007

**Suspicious Activity Report Filing Trend for the Territory of Puerto Rico****For the Period April 1, 1996 through December 31, 2007**

***SARs Total: 26,706***

## Characterizations of Suspicious Activity for the Territory of Puerto Rico

- Note:  The pie chart represents the top nine characterizations plus additional characterizations in total.
-            An individual SAR may cite more than one characterization.  Hence, the number of characterizations detailed here significantly exceeds the total number of SARs.

**Characterizations of Suspicious Activity for the Territory of Puerto Rico**
**For the Period April 1, 1996 through December 31, 2007**

## Puerto Rico Mortgage Loan Fraud SAR Filing Trend For the Period April 1, 1996 through December 31, 2007

**Puerto Rico Mortgage Loan Fraud SAR Filing Trend ****For the Period April 1, 1996 through December 31, 2007**

***SARs Total: 162***

- Note:  Suspicious Activity Report statistical data is continuously updated as additional reports are filed and processed.  For this reason, there may be minor discrepancies between the statistical figures contained in this report and those in previous FinCEN reports.  Annual numbers for this exhibit are calculated by ***Subject Address*** and not filer address; therefore, the annual totals appearing in the above graph do not match those in Section 1, Exhibit 8 (Characterization of Suspicious Activity by State & Territory by Year).

## Suspicious Activity Report Geographic Pattern for the Territory of Puerto Rico

**For the Period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006**

**Note: Statistics based on Filer Branch Address**

## Suspicious Activity Report Geographic Pattern for the territory of Puerto Rico

**For the Period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007**

**Note: Statistics based on Filer Branch Address**
# Presentation: 527886

## Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri

-             Core Lock Phenomenon
-                                Carol Horgan

## Compromised In-Flight      Restart Capability

- Severe shutdown conditions
- Inadequate air flow cores stopped
- Faster-cooling stationary parts contacted stopped rotors
- Core rotors “locked”
- Locked rotors did not respond during assisted start attempts

##    Core Lock

- Long-term Bombardier production problem
- Interference contact at an HPT air seal
- Called “core lock”
- Believed corrected by rework procedure
- Not considered a safety of flight issue

##  Double Engine Failure Checklist

- 240 kts intended as minimum core rotation airspeed
- No core lock if the rotor retains enough energy to cut into seal material
- Maintaining core rotation as operational mitigation
- No data validating checklist for flameout from high power at high altitude

## CRJ-100, -200, -440 Operational Mitigation for Core Lock

- Determine minimum core rotation airspeed
- Demonstrate all methods of in‐flight restart

## Other Air Carrier Engines May Be Affected

- Common design
- Common operation
- Exposure to common hazards
- Recommendation adopted

## Crew Awareness

- Core rotation essential to restart
- Loss of in‐flight restart capability may result
- Performance penalties tied to maintaining minimum airspeed for core rotation

## New Aircraft Certification

- Demonstration of in-flight engine restart capability a certification requirement
- Current certification tests will not identify core lock
- Demonstration of zero core speed, hot shutdown in-flight restart capability recommended

## Slide 9
# Presentation: 337637

## South Central California Coast Steelhead DPS Recovery Workshop

- Carmel – April 25 & 26, 2007

## Welcome & Introduction

- Topic: Recovery of Threatened South-Central California Coast Steelhead
- Introduction of NOAA Fisheries Southwest Region Staff

## Recovery Workshops

- Twelve workshops between April 4 and late July
- 3 each at Carlsbad, Ventura, San Luis Obispo, and Carmel
- Workshop topics:
- #1  TRT products/Threats Assessment
- #2  Recovery Actions
- #3 draft Recovery Plan

## Recovery Planning

**Phase I** = Scientific Inquiry Process
- 			(1) Technical Recovery Team
- 			(2) Historic Population Characterization
- 			(3) Viability Report (comments due 4/30)
**Phase II** = Use Phase 1 results to develop Recovery Plan
-    			(1) Limiting Factors/Threats
- 			(2) Recovery Actions
- 			(3) Recovery Plan

## Workshop Objectives

- Share information about the Technical Recovery Team’s scientific findings and recommendations
- Explain Recovery Planning process
- Solicit your feedback on known or suspected threats to steelhead
- Solicit your feedback on prioritization of the threats to steelhead
- .

## Recovery Planning Goals

- Defining population and range-wide **viability**
- Completing an **analysis of threats** to the species
- Identifying **site-specific** management actions
- Establishing measurable criteria to ensure actions reduce or eliminate the identified threats sufficiently to **recover the fish** so they no longer require the protection of the ESA

## Goal of This Workshop

**Confirm the threats** faced by steelhead in this area
- This afternoon – TRT product presentation and discussion
- Tomorrow 9am - 4pm focus on the threats to steelhead

## What This Workshop Is Not

- Opinions on ESA
- Whether steelhead should be listed or not
- NOAA’s role in enforcement of the ESA
- Specific interactions NOAA Fisheries has with each stakeholder

## Process & Format (agenda) 

- Day 1
- Recovery Planning
- TRT Viability Report and Recommendations
- Questions and Answers
- Day 2
- Threats Assessment Process
- Breakout Sessions on Threats
- Plenary on Threats and Follow up

## Comments & Feedback

- Workshop Participation – recording questions
- Workshop Comment Cards
- Regular Mail
- E-mail
- Public comment period once draft Plans are out

## Importance of Your Participation

**Plan with broad public support** has the greatest likelihood successful implementation
**Increase certainty** to interested parties by providing information useful for organizational planning, timelines, and cost estimates for recovery actions
- A broadly supported plan is likely to be **more competitive** for limited **public funding** than a plan serving narrow interests

## Slide 12

## Ground Rules/Process Agreements

- Honor the meeting agenda or change by agreement
- Listen carefully to speakers (mute cell phones)
- Focus on issues, not people
- Be recognized before speaking
- Monitor your speaking time to allow others a chance to speak
- Avoid side conversations (please leave the room)
- During the Q & A sessions, we’ll take follow-up questions once all participants have had a chance to ask their initial question
# Presentation: 691388

## Mid Stave Support

- Objective
- Minimize dead space between two staves, which butt together
- No module overhang
- Maintains uniform wafer cooling
- Approach
- 1st stave installed is supported by the mid-plane disk
- 2nd stave is supported by 1st stave, using precision tapered pins
- Taper is to facilitate assembly
- Use pin and slot concept to avoid thermal strain issue
- Pin engagement length and external pin frame sized to achieve rigidity, minimizing pin deflections

- Module within 0.5mm of edge

- Disk support @ mid-plane of two 1m staves

## 7.33mm Flattened Tube (16mil wall) at 15bar

- FEA solution-Prototype stave: 0.292in tube height (7.3mm) _16mil wall_
- Average element Von Mises stress on the crown at 217 psi is 8778 psi. Stress bar legend is in Pascal.
- Corresponding nodal deflection is 42.8 microns (0.0017in)
- Measured deflection in LBNL tube of same proportions at 217 psi, resulted in 0.00135in
- Prototype test
- Plan to use low pressure coolant, stress should not be a problem
_*Possible to use C*_***3***_*F*_***8***_* in this size of tube*_
- Al material 3003:yield stress ~28,000psi

- Crown deflection=42.8microns

- (0.0017inches)

- Von Mises element stress
- 8778 psi

- (coarse mesh)

## 7.33mm Flattened Tube (12mil wall) at 6.9bar

- NASTRAN Shell Element Model0.292in tube height (7.3mm) _12mil wall_
- Average element Von Mises stress on the crown at 100 psi is 13,600 psi. Stress bar legend is in Pascal.
- Corresponding nodal deflection is 44.3 microns (0.00177in)
- Al material 3003:yield stress ~28,000psi
- Recommend 12mil wall be used in low pressure only

- Crown δ=44.3microns

- Plate element stress
- Von Mises ~13600psi
# Presentation: 406687

## Two-week forecast skill for October-November-December

- Todd Mitchell
- University of Washington

##  Flood amplitudes and Madden-and-Julian Oscillation phase

- 3 rivers, 32 floods, 1979-2000 (Bond and Vecchi 2003)

- MJO-related precipitation
- passed Indonesia 5-10 days previous

- What forecast skill is there for 15-day October, November, December forecasts in the Pacific Northwest (PNW)?
- MJO: use existing NCEP models or build a statistical model relating tropical daily precipitation / MJO-state to lagged PNW precipitation.
- ENSO: Document 15-day forecast skill as a function of ENSO polarity.

- Data from the NOAA “reforecast” project
- Every day run the forecast model out 15 days.
- Do this 15 times and take the mean.
- Do this for every day since 1979.
- Examine 500mb geopotential height for 1979-2004.
- Characterize the patterns of variability that the model forecasts best.
- Canonical correlation analysis (forecast, verification anomalies).
- Output: pairs of spatial maps (forecast, verification).  Calculate the amplitude of each pattern for each day of the input data.  The temporal correlation of these timeseries is the skill score.

- December-January-February 1981-94:
- Leading verification map (top panel) is a mix of Pacific North American and Northern Annular Modes (map shows typical anomalies, contour interval 10m)
- Associated forecast map (not shown) similar and weaker
- Temporal amplitudes of verification and forecast maps correlated at 0.67
- October-November-December:
- Leading verification map similar to that for DJF, albeit weaker and more of a Pacific / Polar emphasis
- Temporal correlation 0.52

- All years

- Cold ENSO

- Neutral ENSO

- Warm ENSO

## Warm ENSO CCA modes

- verification

- forecast

- 1

- 2

- Pacific Northwest floods occur in October-November-December
- Occurrence modulated by:
-  1) El Niño / Southern Oscillation
- Maybe more 15-day forecast skill in warm ENSO years
- 2) Tropical intraseasonal oscillation:
-  CCA( daily tropical rainfall, lagged PNW precipitation )
-  NCEP forecast models

- Examine skill in shorter forecasts.
- Skill in forecast for average of days 11-15.
- Skill in precipitable water forecasts
- Skill in warm, neutral, and cold ENSO
- Skill for phases of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation (Madden and Julian oscillation)
# Presentation: 692840

## PHENIX DAQ Hours

**PHENIX DAQ Hours**

- Average 7.7 DAQ hrs/day

**days since April 17th**

**65 DAQ hours ****(!)**** in the previous week**
**(5/10 – 5/16) **

- J. Lajoie - RHIC Time/Machine-Expt. Meeting

- 5/10/05

## 200 GeV pp Integrated Luminosity

**200 GeV pp Integrated Luminosity**

**2.88 pb****-1 ****live ZDCLL1**

**PHENIX Goal 5.5 pb****-1 ****live BBCLL1**

**(5/17/05)**

**27.7 B BBCLL1 events sampled**

**1.23 pb****-1 ****live BBCLL1**

**June 25, 2005**

**(3.56 pb****-1 ****projected)**

- J. Lajoie - RHIC Time/Machine-Expt. Meeting

- 5/10/05

## 200 GeV pp “Figure of Merit”

**200 GeV pp “Figure of Merit”**

**(5/17/05)**

**PHENIX Goal 226 nb****-1**

**60.2 nb****-1**

**June 25, 2005**

**(190 nb****-1 ****projected)**

- J. Lajoie - RHIC Time/Machine-Expt. Meeting

- 5/10/05

## Lies, Damn Lies, and Projections...

- Luminosity/FOM growth ~constant for past ten days
- Over past week lower luminosity compensated for by duty cycle
- Integrated Luminosity: 58.5 nb-1/day
- FOM: 3.3 nb-1/day
- Assuming no change in polarization
- More realistic assessment of projected totals:
- 410 GeV development time/running
- Assume four days
- Transverse running
- Assume six days
- ~350 nb-1 integrated, ~10% of total
- Integrated Luminosity:   2.98 pb-1  (54% of goal)
- Figure of Merit:    0.157 pb-1  (69% of goal)

- J. Lajoie - RHIC Time/Machine-Expt. Meeting

- 5/10/05
# Presentation: 335032

## Composite of 20 wintertime events in which the northern polar vortex became anomalously weak—essentially 20 major warmings. The contours are of the Northern Annular Mode index (as in Baldwin and Dunkerton, Science, 244, 581-584, 2001.) This diagram illustrates that circulation changes at the stratopause level affect the surface, providing a mechanism by which solar-induced changes to the upper stratosphere can have an effect on surface weather.

- Composite of 20 wintertime events in which the northern polar vortex became anomalously weak—essentially 20 major warmings. The contours are of the Northern Annular Mode index (as in Baldwin and Dunkerton, *Science*, 244, 581-584, 2001.) This diagram illustrates that circulation changes at the stratopause level affect the surface, providing a mechanism by which solar-induced changes to the upper stratosphere can have an effect on surface weather.

## Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in ERA-40 reanalysis data (east-west composite). The ERA-40 data set has allowed us to see a new feature in the QBO—the positive anomaly near 1 hPa. This appears to be important because it links solar-ozone temperature changes in this region to changes in the strength of the polar vortex. The upper stratospheric effect (black arrow) may be more important than the middle stratospheric effect (gray arrow). Further details are in Pascoe et al., submitted to the Quarterly Journal (available at www.nwra.com/baldwin).

- Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in ERA-40 reanalysis data (east-west composite). The ERA-40 data set has allowed us to see a new feature in the QBO—the positive anomaly near 1 hPa. This appears to be important because it links solar-ozone temperature changes in this region to changes in the strength of the polar vortex. The upper stratospheric effect (black arrow) may be more important than the middle stratospheric effect (gray arrow). Further details are in Pascoe et al., submitted to the *Quarterly Journal* (available at www.nwra.com/baldwin).
# Presentation: 259504

## Land Surface Change Project

**Task 27 - Consequences of Potomac Watershed **
**	****	****Land-use and Land Cover Change**
**Task 29 - Land Cover Trends (EGSC)**
**Task 30 - National Land Cover Dataset – NLCD (EGSC)**

**Notes:**
This project addresses all three GAM Pillers: GITAN, Trends, and NLCD.

## Land Surface Change Project

**Consequences of Potomac Watershed Land-use and Land Cover Change**

## Scientific Question

**What human-induced and natural processes have significantly impacted the Chesapeake Bay Watershed ?**
**Outcome - what can be done to improve the Bay’s ecosystem health and sustainability ?**

## Objectives

**Document land cover change and the consequences of change in specific study areas, e.g., Mattowoman**
**Compare to other areas, e.g., West Br (ROMA)**
**	**
**Document what options are possible to address these consequences, e.g., BMP**
**	****	**

## Approach

**Geographic analysis will be used to improve the understanding of how the landscape changes in the Potomac watershed over time for selected study areas.**
**Geospatial, socio-economic, land remote sensing, and other natural science data will be used to quantify landscape characteristics, identify rates of landscape change**

**Notes:**
Basically we are taking Loveland National Trends techniques/methods and applying them to regional and local problems. – Tom to speak more on the methodolgy.

## Milestones

**FY06 – Construct DB, Publish Home Page,**
**                       ****Quarterly Presentations **
**FY07 – Task Poster, **
**                       ****Quarterly Presentations **
**FY08 – Publish Other WEB pages,**
**                       ****Quarterly Presentations **
**FY09 – Publish DB on WEB, **
**                       ****Quarterly Presentations **
**FY10 – Publish Final Report on WEB,**
**                        ****Quarterly Presentations**

## Products

**Products**

**Presentations**
**Website Pages**
**Openfile Report**
**Posters**
**Database**

## Progress

**1Q06**
**Literature searches**
**Collect digital data**
**Coordinate with sister GD project**
**Coordinate with cooperator (F&M)**
**Continue with ROMA LC Report**
**Continue with ROMA Metadata**
**2Q – 4Q**
**Develop DB**
**Develop WEB Home Page**

## Minor Problems

**IS studies put on hold till out years**
**BMP studies put on hold till out years**
**ROMA Metadata being done in house.**

**Notes:**
Because of funding IS and BMP studies delayed until out years.

## Additional Information

**See CBP Website – Prominent in CBP Website**
**                       **
**See http://erg.usgs.gov/rit/**

**Notes:**
We are prominent in the Chesapeake Bay Program Website – just go to the Land-use area.
# Presentation: 689993

## Recent Advancement in Understanding Stratospherere Influence on Troposphere and Impact of Solar Flux Variability

**Recent Advancement in Understanding Stratospherere Influence on Troposphere and Impact of Solar Flux Variability**

**Foukal, P., ****2003****: Can slow variations in solar luminosity provide missing link between the sun and climate?  *****EOS*****, Transactions, AGU, 84, page 205, 208.**
**Meehl, G., W.M. Washington, T.M.L. Wigley, J.M. Arblaster, and A. Dai, ****2003****:  Solar and greenhouse gas forcing and climate response in the twentieth century.  *****J. Climate*****, 16, 426-444.**
**Importance of ocean dynamical feedbacks**
**Amplification of solar forcing when combining with anthropogenic green house gas forcing**
**Labitzke, K. et al., ****2002****:  The global signal of the 11-year solar cycle in the stratosphere: observations and models.  *****Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics*****, 64, 203-210.**
**Baldwin, M.P., and T.J. Dunkerton, ****2001****:  Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes.  *****Science*****, 294, 581-584**
**Stratospheric harbingers may be used as a predictor of tropospheric weather regimes. **
**Salby, M. and P. Callaghan, ****2000****:  Connection between the solar cycle and the QBO:  The missing link.  *****J. Climate*****, 13, 2652-2662.**
**Fris-Chriistensen, E., ****2000****:  Solar variability and climate – a summary.  *****Space Science Reviews*****, 94, 411-421.**

**- A12 -**

## Overall there is reasonable agreement between observations and model simulations for effects in temperature, whereas there are substantial uncertainties regarding the vertical structure of the ozone response.  Mechanistic models are providing new insights into the mechanisms of solar influence.  Improved characterization of the solar cycle is important for understanding temperature variability in stratospheric observational records that span only a few decades.

**——  ****SPARC Workshop on Understanding Seasonal Temperature  Trends in the Stratosphere, 5 November 2003, Silver Spring, Maryland**
# Presentation: 704633

## DELEGATIONS

## DELEGATIONS

- FAR42.302(26)
**PERFORM PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AND PLANT CLEARANCE**
**NSF1842.**
**PIC 01-19 (4-27-01) **CENTERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO DELEGATE PR0PERTY ADMINISTRATION TO DCMA OR ONR, AS APPROPRIATE, FOR ALL OFF-SITE CONTRACTORS AND GRANTEES, SINCE **CENTER PROPERTY OFFICE IS NOT STAFFED TO PERFORM THIS WORK**.

## DELEGATIONS

**GSFC Form 210.93 “DELEGATION CHECKLIST**. (SEE HANDOUT)
- THIS FORM IS TO BE SENT TO CODE 210.2 ATTN: MARY FORTE
**PIC 01-24** **(10/29/01)** See Handout.
- USE OF LATEST VERSION OF THE STANDARD PROPERTY DELEGATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS.**  **

## DELEGATIONS

- REVIEW OF THE DELEGATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS.
- PIC 01-24
# Presentation: 916484

**Global Price and Income History 1200-1950 – Stage 1**
- (SES 0433358)
- Peter H. Lindert (UC Davis) and Philip T. Hoffman (Caltech)

## Issues

- 	How well or badly did people live around the world in centuries past?  When did the North Atlantic countries pull ahead of other countries, or were they always ahead?  What were the underlying causes?  How can scholars find out more?

## Objectives

- An international co-laboratory that will eventually be the data site for all quantitative history of prices, wages, and incomes.
- Links to the post-1950 Penn World Tables
- New historical interpretations

## First big task

- Conversion of the world’s pre-metric measurements into metric

## A new interpretation already achieved this year

- New findings on real incomes in East Asia, 18th-early 20th centuries

## New primary data sources

- _New archival discoveries in Beijing_

## New group, supplying online data

- The Global Price and Income History Group (19 scholars, of which 5 US citizens, 6 US residents)
**Visit us at **_**[http:](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**__**[//gpih](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**__**[.](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**__**[ucdavis](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**__**[.](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**__**[edu](http://your.site.edu/homepage)**_
# Presentation: 030195

## CHI added to Ohmic Discharge

- D. Mueller and B. Nelson

## On HIT-II Persistent Current  was Observed after CHI

- Increase in Ip (corrected for Iwall) persists after Vinj
- Decay rate of Ip is ~ 10 times that for Vloop = 0 at end of discharge.
- Plasma li calculated by EFIT shows slight decrease after Vinj

## Need high injector current and/or low injector  flux

- For inj  > tok , Ip persists past Iinj.
- Where tok = 0 Ip / T and inj =  0 Iinj /inj
- = m0J/B.  integrating **J** and **B** over a surface with current I and flux  gives  = 0I/.

## Have Comparable target plasma in NSTX

## What is proposed for half day

- Propose to add CHI to ohmic LSN discharge
- Use cap bank for fast rise
- Use crowbar for ability to have fast off time to investigate persistence of Ip and li change
- Noise on signals still an unresolved issue.
- Repeat with NBI A blips to measure J(r) with MSE.
# Presentation: 381534

## Data Object Navigation

- Paolo Calafiura

## Outline

- Selected Use Cases
- Tracking, Truth Navigation, Jet Reco
- Design Entities
- Causal (Forward) Associations
- Association Objects and Properties
- Graph (Composite) Navigation
- First Recommendations
- Future RTF Work

## (Pseudo) Tracking

## Causal (Forward) Associations

- A Track Candidate has a listof the Raw Hits it was created from
- list<RawHit*> m_aHits;
- Often pointers replacedwith ElementLinks
- ElementLinkVector<RawHit> m_aHits;
- Allow to persistify (write/read) associations

## Association Objects

- A re-fitted hit has an associationto each fitted track it belongs to
- A fitted track has a list of assoc hits
- Many to many, bi-directional association implemented using a separate Association Obj
- list<HitOnTrack> m_refHits;

## External Navigation

- Hit-Track relationships can also be placed in a separate data object
- typedef multimap<Track*, HitsOnTrack> HitTrackAssoc;
- May be slower
- Easier to use/setup than “embedded” bidirectional

## Truth Navigation

- Navigate from generator particles to simulated (Raw) Data Objects & viceversa
- Optionally associate weights with edges

## Jet Reconstruction

- Which Cells belong to Jet1?
- What’s the Jet energy?
- Which Jet Cell4 belongs to?
- Which Cells do not belong to any Jet?
- What’s the unassigned energy?

- PJ1

- PJ2

- Tw2

- Clu1

- C1

- C2

- C3

- C4

- PJ3

- Jet1

- Jet2

- 1

- 0.6

- 0.4

- 0.3

- 0.7

## Composite Navigation

- Truth Association and Jet Reco associations form a directed graph
- Provide navigation objects (graph visitors)
- Traverse selectively (filtering vertices and edges)
- Traverse bidirectionally (reversing edges)
- Associate properties (e.g. weights) to edges
- Associate objects to vertices
- More in Peter’s talk

## First Recommendations

- Use plain pointers for causal (forward) associations
- Replace with data links where required
- Use Association Objects for reverse navigation and bi-directional associations
- Use Composite Navigation to traverse complex structures
- Reduce physical coupling
- Enforce coherent interface

## Future RTF Work

- Prototype Graph Navigation
- Traversal strategies, associate properties, internal data structures, reverse navigation
- Navigation and Steering
- Uses, seeded by, excludes...
- Opaque data links
- Experiment with bidirectional navigation strategies
- Association object and/or external navigation

## Slide 12

**Notes:**
Volume ON
# Presentation: 917177

## Morbidity Coding in Korea

**Joon H. Hong**

## Classification Systems Used in Korea

**	****	****	****	****Diagnosis****	****    ****	****    Procedure**
**1956-1960****	****	****SNDO                     SNDO**
**1961-1967****	****	****KCD(ICD-7)****	****    ICD-7**
**1968-1978****	****	****KCD-1(ICD-8A)      ICD-8A**
**1979-1994****	****	****KCD-2(ICD-9)        ICPM**
**1995-2002****	****	****KCD-3(ICD-10)      ICPM, ICD-9CM**
**2003-****	****	****         KCD-4(ICD-10)      ICD-9CM**
**                           ****Updated by 2002**

## Morbidity Coding Education in Korea

**Education programs for health record/information management**
**4 year program: 16**
**2 year program: about 50**
**Lecture for classification: 2 or 3 semesters(100-150 hrs)**
**History of KCD-4 and ICD-10**
**How to code morbidity by using KCD-4 or ICD-10**
**How to code procedures using ICD-9 CM**
**Understanding the contents of medical record and coding the diagnoses and procedures in the record**
**Clinical practicum for 5-6 weeks for practice of coding, tumor registry, statistics, etc.**
**“****Classification of diseases and procedures” is included in the core curriculum required by the government for eligibility of national certificate exam for health record/ information professional**

## National Certificate System for Health Record/Information Professionals in Korea

**National certificate exam since 1985**
**Implementing annually**
**Eligibility: the graduates of the 2 year or 4 year program of health record/information management**
**About 1000 candidates apply the exam every year and the average passing rate is around 50%**
**National certificates given to the successful candidates by the minister of Health and Welfare**
**No separate education program for coding and no separate job title “coder”**
**By law, classification of diseases and procedures is defined as the job of certified medical record/ information professionals**
# Presentation: 056137

## Runway Friction Measurement

- ByThomas J. YagerNASA Langley Research CenterPresented at FAA/Aviation Industry Workshop onRunway Condition Determination, Reporting and Report DisseminationFAA Headquarters; Washington DCAugust 7-8, 2006

## Slide 2

## Test Aircraft

- Falcon 20

- B737-100

- B727-100

- B757-100

- Dash 8

**Test Aircraft**

## Ground Test Vehicles

**Ground Test Vehicles**

**Instrumented Tire Test Vehicle**

**Diagonal Braked Vehicle**

**Electronic Recording Decelerometer Vehicle**

**Runway Friction Tester**

**Airport Surface Friction Tester**

**Surface Friction Tester**

## Ground Test Trailers

**IMAG Variable/Fixed Slip**

**Runar Variable/Fixed Slip**

**BV-11 Skiddometer**

**GripTester Fixed Slip**

**E-274 Skid Trailer**

**Ground Test Trailers**

## Aircraft vs. IRFI

## CRFI Table

- <date/time>

## IRFI Table

- <date/time>

## Joint Program Summary

- In nearly 10 years of the joint program, tests have involved
- 10 aircraft
- 49 ground vehicles
- 10 test sites
- 450 individuals representing over 65 organizations from 16 different countries have participated
- The Canadian and the International Runway Friction Indices have been established

## Slide 10

## Friction Measurement Variables

-  Operator
-  Equipment calibration & maintenance
-  Test procedure
-  Runway conditions
-  Braking methods
-  Compliance to existing standards

## Future Activities and Recommendations

- Prepare and publish Joint Program final report and recommendations
- Involve other organizations in ongoing research investigations, e.g. collect aircraft/ground vehicle friction data at airport in Traverse City, MI
- Solicit more government/industry support and funding to maintain availability of NASA B-757 test aircraft
- Establish calibration centers for friction measuring equipment
- Encourage ICAO to form a runway friction study group
- Perform EMAS study at NASA Langley’s ALDF test track
- Conduct NASA’s 14th annual workshop, May 14-18, 2007

## Fourteenth Annual

**NASA Tire/Runway Friction Workshop**

**May 14-18, 2007**
**NASA Wallops Flight Facility**
**Website: http://runfric.larc.nasa.gov**

**YOKOSO**

**WELKOM**

**VELKOMMEN**

**WILLKOMMEN**

**BENVENUTO**

**WELCOME**

**WELCOME**

**WILLKOMMEN**

**BENVENUTO**

**WELKOM**

**VELKOMMEN**

## Slide 14

## Test Site 2

**Not to scale**

**Test Site 2**
**Taxiway 4/22 “ECHO”**

**Asphalt Surface**

**10’**

**N159**
**Ramp**

**N159**
**Ramp**

**R-2**

**R-3**

**10’**

**10’**

**10’**

**MS/3**

**MS/2**

**MS/1**

**MS/0**

**10’**

**300’**

**300’**

**300’**

**300’**

**R/W 4/22**

**75’**

**909’**

**156’**

**48’**

**P**

**P-1**

**L**

**4’**

**R-1**

**Echo 3**

**Echo 2**

**Echo 1**

**R-5**

**Echo 4**

**222’**

**LS1**

**RS4**

**300’**

**300’**

**M1**

**EK3**

**EK1**

**EK4**

**EK2**

**300’**
# Presentation: 762282

**ICD-GPS-705**
**REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS**
- Systems Engineering
- NAVSTAR GPS Joint Program Office
- Email: czerc@losangeles.af.mil

**Notes:**
INTRODUCTION
CSEL FIELD NEW SAR 

## OVERVIEW

- Roles and Responsibilities
- Public Review
- Document Access
- Comment Matrix and Instructions
- Interface Control Document (ICD) Process

## ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

- The GPS JPO is responsible for developing and maintaining ICD-GPS-705
- Interface Control Contractor (ICC) drafts the ICD
- Interface Control Working Group (ICWG) negotiates contents of the ICD
- Configuration Control Board (CCB) approves final product
- Civil users are represented by the DOT Deputy Program Manager
- DOT is a member of the ICWG and CCB

## PUBLIC REVIEW

- ICD-GPS-705 affects the entire GPS civil community
- Review and comments are essential!
- Comments will be consolidated and published with their preliminary dispositions
- Reviewing community can comment on preliminary dispositions

## DOCUMENT ACCESS

- ICD-GPS-705 is available on the JPO public website
- URL:  http://gps.losangeles.af.mil/
- Click “GPS Library”
- Click “GPS Public”
- Click “Documents”
- Hyperlinks to the ICD and to the comment matrix are provided

## COMMENT MATRIX

## COMMENT MATRIX INSTRUCTIONS

## ICD PROCESS

- An initial ICWG meeting is tentatively scheduled for 26 Jul 01
- Participants (contact DOT Deputy PM)
- Agenda will consist of issues needing community resolution
- Subsequent meetings scheduled as needed
- CZE will present ICD to JPO CCB for approval

## CONTACT

- Email: czerc@losangeles.af.mil
# Presentation: 777789

## Simulating Realistic Doppler Wind Lidar Observations

- G. D. Emmitt, S. A. Wood and S. Greco
- Simpson Weather Associates
- Charlottesville, VA
- 6 March 2003

## Bracketing Concepts

- Clouds permitting; 200 km resolution; zero error within sample volume; measurement and representative errors added to simulated observations during assimilation cycles
- Full profiles (0-20km) over 2000km swath
- PBL and cloud top winds only
- mid and upper troposphere cloud free only
- full profile along a single line-of-sight (non-scanning)

## Realistic DWLs (1)

- Flown at 400 km rather than NPOESS 824 km
- Observation errors are flow dependent
- Systematic errors can be included
- Distribution of data is aerosol and attenuation dependent

## Realistic DWLs (2)

- IPO and GTWS baseline concepts using single DWL technologies (coherent and direct). Tend to be quite large (energy, telescope, R&D...)
- Hybrid DWL concept currently most favored option for further study. Uses both coherent and direct detection using technology much closer to the SOTA.

## Realistic DWLs (3)

- IPO coherent baseline system
- IPO direct detection system
- IPO hybrid systems (options 1 and 2)
- ESA’s ADM
- Japan’s JEM/CDL

## NPOESS Bracketing Full Profile

- (ignore system parameters)

## NPOESS Bracketing PBL/CLDS Only

- (ignore system parameters)

## NPOESS Bracketing Mid/Upper Only

- (ignore system parameters)

## IPO Coherent Baseline

- 1

## IPO Direct (mol) Baseline

- 3.6

## IPO Coherent Hybrid

- .03

## IPO Direct Hybrid (1)

- .22

## IPO Direct Hybrid (2)

- .14

## ESA ADM Direct (non scanning)

- 5.2

## JEM CDL Coherent (two orthogonals)

- .14

## Conclusions

- Ready to produce simulated observations for some “realistic” DWL concepts
- systematic errors
- fewer observations
- greater cloud effects
- situation representativeness errors
- Still need community input for D-Edge Direct aerosol, MAC space (mol and aero) and ADM aerosol?
- OSSEs need to include CMV, WVMV, scatterometer and ACARS simulated winds.
# Presentation: 806839

## Power Supply System Impacts

**WBS 1.1.3  *****Power Supply System***
**Level 3 Manager**
***Nancy Grossman***** **
***FNAL***
**Dec 11, 2001**

## Update of PS Needs

**V109 has one more 6-3-120 (now 4 instead of 3) and runs at a higher current (1050 amps)**
- Requires another 500 KW supply to get the needed volts.
- Have space for 1 more 500 KW in TSB.
- Only remaining 500 KW PS are old Transrex’s, we are checking on getting an additional one (or other options, and checking the ramp).
**V110 has one less EPB (now 5 instead of 6) and runs at a higher current (1400 amps)**
- Does not require an PS changes, will need to re-calculate the ramp.
**Q109 is now two different quads (3Q120, 3Q60) which can run on one supply.**
**Two possible 3Q120’s (quads) in the carrier tunnel (unlined region)**
- Will need an additional PS each (there is room for them and we have spares)
**Cable lengths and costs all need to be re-estimated.**

## Update of Regulation Needs

**Magnet Strings regulation requirements are looser with the new beam optics.**
- Could use less regulation than we have budgeted for, if this remains true.
- Not clear if loosening the regulation is worth the money saved.
- Don’t need to decide until FY2003.
- Costed filters for all 7 strings, and BLB systems for 3 strings, HOLEC transductors and special FNAL electronics for all 7 strings.

## Summary

**All  these comments are very preliminary and Steve Hays will check in detail to see what are the final implications.**
**Main Changes:**
- Need extra 500 KW for V109.
- Need 2 more quad PS if  put quads in carrier tunnel.
- PS regulation requirements are looser.
- Cable lengths and numbers.
- (need to re-do ramp calculations and cable calculations/costs)
**Implications:**
- Can we get additional cable (500 kcm) or is it too late?  Not sure if we will need it or not...
- Additional costs are for 500 KW PS and quads and cables.  Estimate several ten’s of thousands of dollars (FY$98).
- Might be able to save money on PS regulation, but we would need to think long and hard before doing that.
# Presentation: 682424

## 900 MHz SPECIALIZED MOBILE RADIO SERVICE LICENSESAUCTION #55 

## Disclaimer

- Nothing herein is intended to supersede any provision of the Commission's rules or public notices.  These slides should not be used as a substitute for a prospective applicant's review of the Commission's relevant orders, rules, and public notices.  Prospective applicants must familiarize themselves thoroughly and remain current with the Commission's rules relating to 900 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio (“SMR”) Service, rules relating to application and auction procedures, and the procedures, terms and conditions contained in the Auction No. 55 public notices.

## Form 159

## Form 159

## Form 159

## Form 159

## Continued

-  	All applicants are urged to do the  		following:
-  	*Print the electronic version of the  **	**	**FCC Form 159.  The form has been  **	**pre-filled based on the information  **	**that was provided on your FCC **	**Form 175 Application.*
* **	**Submit Wire Transfer Instructions **	**for Refund Purposes.*

## FCC Form 159

-  	Applicants must fax a completed FCC Form 159 (Revised 2/03) to Mellon Bank at (412) 209-6045 at least one hour before placing the order for the wire transfer (but on the same business day).
-  	Detailed instructions for completion of the FCC Form 159 are included in Attachment E of Public Notice DA 03- 3235 dated October 17, 2003.

## Upfront Payments Deadline 

- 	All upfront payments must be received at Mellon Bank by 6:00 p.m. ET on January 15, 2004.
- 	All payments must be in U.S. Dollars.
-    	All payments must be made by Wire                	Transfer.

## Upfront Payments (Continued)

-  	Upfront payments for Auction #55 go to a lockbox number different from the lockboxes used in previous FCC Auctions, and different from the lockbox number to be used for post-auction payments.
-  	Failure to deliver the upfront payment by the January 15, 2004 deadline will result in dismissal of the application and disqualification from participation in the auction.

## Making Auction Payment By Wire Transfer

- 	Wire transfer payments must be received by 6:00 p.m. ET on January 15, 2004.  To avoid untimely payments, applicants should discuss arrangements (including bank closing schedules) with their banker several days before they plan to make the wire transfer, and allow sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed before the deadline.

## Applicants will need the following information:

- ABA Routing Number:  043000261
- Receiving Bank: Mellon Pittsburgh
- BNF:  FCC/Account # 910-1211
- OBI Field:  (skip one space between each information item)
- “AUCTIONPAY”

## Wire Transfer Instructions (continued)

- FCC Registration No (FRN):  (same as FCC Form 159, Block 11
- Payment Type Code:  (“A55U”)
- FCC Code 1:  (same as FCC Form 159, block 28A) enter “55”
- Payer Name:  (same as FCC Form 159, block 2)
- Lockbox No:  “358435”

- Refund Information

## For additional questions, please contact:

- Gail Glasser – (202) 418-0578
- _[gail.glasser@fcc.gov](mailto:gail.glasser@fcc.gov)__ _
# Presentation: 192955

## Proton Plan Agenda	

- Review Update – E. Prebys
- MI Collimation Review Summary – B. Brown and/or I. Kourbanis
- Draft Parameter Lists
- Linac – L. Allen
- Booster – E. Prebys
- Main Injector – I. Kourbanis

## Review (August 15-16) Draft Agenda

## Practice Talks

- Review is August 15-16
- Unfortunately,  I’ll be out of town August 4-11.
- I’d like to get through some of the practice talks at our regular meeting on 8/2 and perhaps an extra meeting 8/3.
- Rest of practice talks morning of 8/14.

## Booster Draft Parameter List
# Presentation: 410271

## Ohio University Health Sciences Library and CDRS

***Laura Windsor***
***Health Sciences Reference Librarian***
***Ohio University***

## Why Get Involved?

**Staff Benefits**
- Learn to use a Web Interface
- Must think critically
- Are challenged by the questions
- Gain positive attitude when not overwhelmed

**Patron Benefits**
- Can detect quality
- Appreciate personal and sensitive response
- Trust the information provider
- Trust our confidential standards

## CDRS:

- Let’s Get Global

## Slide 4

## CDRS

**Build on a Cooperative Workforce**** **
**Work toward a Common Goal**** **
**Expand our Resources**** **
**Enrich our Knowledge**

## Health on the Web

- Unreliable information
- Dangerous information
- Audience not usually considered (age)

## Librarians to the Rescue!

## Profile

**LC Classification Strengths (including collection language and formats, etc.)**
**Education Levels Served**
**Times Available for CDRS Service**

## Questions Coded & Routed

**	****Latest date acceptable (deadline)**
**	****Patron education level**
**	****LC Classification subject area**
**	****Sources already consulted ******
**	****Originating library – importance on resource availability**
**	****Information from original librarian on sources patron already has**

** ****	****Information I receive usually includes:**

## Reliable information

## Safe information

## Audience considered in regard to education level

## CDRS in Action!

## Email Alert

## Deadline

## Start Digging for the Answer

## Keep Looking...

## Submit Answer

## “Thanks!”

**“****Thanks!”**

## Slide 20
# Presentation: 849375

## Beams Two Weeks in Review

- 10 stores
- Record # of Protons – store 1369
- Unstacking Lattice attempted – store 1393
- Average Initial Luminosity – 12.42 E30
- Machine studies

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Beams Two Weeks in Review

- Why the downward trend?
- Power outages & glitches
- Instabilities in the Tevatron
- P1 line dipole failure

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Initial Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Protons to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbars to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies & Operation Summary

- TEL at 150 to inject more protons
- Ramp tune-up
- B0 Vertical separator
- Higher Intensity protons
- Blown-up pbars

- All Experimenters Meeting

## B0 Vertical Separator

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Beam loss

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Beam Blow-up

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies & Operation Summary

- Accumulator ramp development studies
- Continued success
- New lattice used for store #1393
- More work after shutdown

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Unstacking Lattice

|  | Stacking | Shot | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Core Orbit | 628888 | 628940 | 52 Hz |
| Extraction Orbit | 628765 | 628724
(~Run I) | -41 Hz |
| Eta ( Core ) | 0.0097 | 0.025 | 0.0153 |
| A:BFIELD | 16714.3 | 16723.9 | 9.6 G |

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Unstacking Lattice

- Ramp from Stacking to Unstacking Lattice

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Unstacking Lattice

- Store 1393

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

- MI8 lattice
- Instrumentation
- Beam Line Tuner
- Flying Wires
- ’Crawling’ wire integrity
- Slip stacking
- 8 GeV coalescing

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Recycler Studies Summary

- Recent work with protons exclusively
- Transfer line admittance measurements
- BPM log amp investigation

- All Experimenters Meeting