# Presentation: 011918

##   RECYCLER   BPM      SYSTEM   UPGRADE,

** ****BPM TEST STATUS**

***    ******Brajesh Choudhary & Martin Hu***

**  ****& FUTURE PLANS**

## Thanks to:

-       ***Jim Crisp, Peter Prieto, Duane Voy, Tom Meyer  & Craig McClure for hardware and software support.  ***

***Special thanks to:***

***Bill Foster & Ming-Jen Yang for ideas and discussion. ******To Consolato Gattuso for his ever helpful presence******.***

**Thanks also to:**

***Mark Ross, Jim Sebek,Till Straumann and Douglas McCormick of SLAC for ideas.***

##               BASICS

***Maintain high pbar production rate in the  Accumulator by periodically sending the pbar stack to the Recycler, and***
***By recycling the left over pbars from the Tevatron to the Recycler and further cooling it, before injecting again in the Tevatron.***

**              ****BASICS**

## WHAT IS A BPM?

- Recycler BPM system:
- The present recycler BPM system consists of 30cm long elliptical split-plate detectors matching the Recycler pipe shape, with axis dimensions of 9.6cm by 4.4cm. In some of the straight sections the Recycler uses round BPM’s that have a 10cm aperture.

- Beam Position Monitor:
- The conventional beam position monitor has a pair of electrodes (or 2 pairs, if 2 beam position coordinates are to be measured) on which signals are induced. The ratio of the amplitudes of the induced signals at the carrier frequency, either the beam-bunching frequency or a harmonic, is uniquely related to the beam position.

##          RECYCLER BPMs

**Split tube BPM Design**

**End View**

**Top View**

**Pictures - Courtesy Jim Crisp**

## NEED FOR GOOD BPMs

- In the Recycler, the BPM system is used  for orbit measurement, as well as for  ion clearing purpose.  For this reason, initially it was decided to have 2 BPM’s per half cell or a total of 414 BPM’s for the 3320 meter ring. The associated injection and extraction beam lines together have an additional 28 BPM’s.
- Why do we need a precision  BPM system:

- To measure “Injection oscillation” or  “Orbit closure”.
- To have a proper “Global orbit control” or to minimize the feed down effect, and
- To have proper turn-by-turn (TBT) lattice measurement.

## PRESENT BPM SYSTEM       -  A BRIEF  OVERVIEW

- In the present BPM system, the BPM electrodes reside in a vacuum inside the Recycler beampipe. The capacitance of the BPM electrodes and inductors at the input of the first pre-amp forms a resonant circuit at 7.5 MHz with a ‘Q’ of about 6. A second amplification stage with another 7.5 MHz resonant circuit (‘Q’~15) is used to drive the long cable runs from the tunnel to the service buildings. In the service buildings, the signals are transformed from differential to single-ended and routed to the log amplifier modules which provides the log of A/B to the digitizers and the ACNET front-end. The output of the log amplifier is a sample and hold signal triggered relative to beam revolution markers.

##       STATUS OF THE CURRENT BPM SYSTEM

- Frequency capability – Does not work at all required frequencies. Tuned to the third harmonic (a single frequency of 7.5 MHz) and is very sensitive to RF parameters. Need to work at 89 KHz, 2.5 MHz & 7.5MHz.
- Logarithmic Amplifiers – Non-conformity of log amps leads to sampling time error. Log amps are designed to measure steady state signal, and are not very reliable with transient signal.
- Channel Coupling – Coupling between BPM plates degrades the signal.
- Reliability Issues – for example, switch failure due to perceived radiation damage.

**Inadequacies of the present BPM system:**

## USER's OBSERVATIONS ABOUT THE PRESENT BPM SYSTEM

- The present system is noisy (large rms).
- Poor transient (first turn) measurement of the beam position due to log non-conformity error inherent in the log amp modules.
- Poor consistency of measurement of the same beam.
- Uncertainty in offset or  the physical center of the BPM.
- Uncertainty in the reported absolute position.
- Inconsistencies in reported relative position (orbit difference).
- The measured relative displacements fall short of the MAD model prediction.
- Poor measurement reproducibility on longer time scale (hours, days etc.).

## Preamp input R and Cplate+Ccable set the corner frequency of 10MHz.

- The motivation for upgrade has been necessitated to overcome the inherent limitations as well as performance shortfalls of the current system. The Digital BPM has the following characteristics (from Peter Preito’s note & Jim Crisp):

- The new system uses a low pass preamp filter.
- The BPM, pre-amp and the cable forms a band pass circuit.
- Preamp input R and Cplate+Ccable set the corner frequency of 10MHz.
- Reduces coupling at 2.5MHz and 7.5MHz by reducing the preamp input impedance.

## UPGRADE PROPOSAL

- Replace log amps with commercial digital receivers EchoteK ECDR-GC814  board (in the service building).
- Modify preamps in the tunnel to work at 89 KHz, 2.5 MHz & 7.5 MHz –  make the system more flexible.
- No. 2 requires work on VME crates and cables (in service buildings).
- New modified software to read out digital down converter.
- Implement MDAT decoder software. **MDAT is a communication system that transmits a variety of machine related information. In the case of the Recycler, MDAT provides the facility to track barrier bucket location based upon data provided by the Recycler Ring Low Level RF. **

## Alignment Requirements:

- The required relative alignment of the detector is defined in the “alignment reference table”. The position of the BPM’s also have a specific offset from the center line of adjacent magnets depending on the type of gradient magnets at the given location.

**Tolerance for BPM               Value**

- Transverse Offset                         0.25mm

- Relative Roll                              5 mrad

## FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

**RECYCLER OPERATIONAL MODE (for Protons and Pbars):**
**2.5 MHz** – In this mode of operation the MI completes a bucket to bucket transfer of 4 coalesced (2.5MHz) bunches spaced 21, 53MHz buckets apart into the Recycler. The Recycler captures the beam in the 2.5MHz buckets spaced 21, 53 MHz buckets apart.
**7.5 MHz** – Same as above but in this case the Recycler also plays out a 7.5MHz waveform on top of the 2.5MHz waveform.
**89 KHz  debunched beam in the barrier buckets** – barrier buckets in the Recycler are typically 40 buckets wide (53 MHz buckets) and can have separations from 20 to 504 buckets with varying intensity listed in the dynamic range.

## System Performance Requirements:

**System Performance Requirements:**

- The BPM system should be able to measure the beam position with these  RF’s:

- 4 x 2.5 MHz Bunches (****t  = 25 to 50 nsec)
- 12 x 7.5 MHz Bunches (****t  = 6 to 12 nsec)
- Barrier buckets with de-bunched beam (89KHz)

## Dynamic Range - We need to be able to measure:

**Dynamic Range - We need to be able to measure:**
- 1.   From 0.3E10/bunch (1.2E10 total) to 7.5E10/bunch (30E10 total) particles for all 2.5MHz transfers.
- From 0.1E10/bunch (1.2E10 total) to 2.0E10/bunch (24E10 total) particles for all 7.5MHz transfers.
- From 1E10 to 400E10 particles for 89 KHz stored beam.

## SPECIFIC MEASUREMENTS:

**SPECIFIC MEASUREMENTS:**

- For  less than 1E10 particles or greater than 10mm amplitude,  1.5mm rms in absolute position and 0.5mm rms resolution reproducibility  - subsequent measurements of the same beam.
- For greater than 10E10 particles and less than 10mm amplitude 0.5mm rms in absolute position and 0.15mm rms resolution reproducibility – subsequent measurement of the same beam.
- Ability to close the Recycler injection orbit to the closed orbit to less than 250 microns.
- Day to day stability to the level of 1 and 2.

## FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

**SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS:**
- The BPM system must provide real time data acquisition modes, operation mode coordination, and data scaling and access methods. The real-time component of this package implements the following operational modes:

- Flash Mode: Single turn position of  beam orbit around the ring. One need to be able to measure the first turn beam orbit in the Recycler after injection to the same accuracy as later orbits.
-  Background Flash Mode: Flash data taken at 200Hz.
-  Closed Orbit Mode: Average of up to 128 background flashes.
- Turn-by-Turn Mode: Flash data for up to 1024 consecutive turns.

## TESTS OF DDC BPM’s

- Three bump scale and linearity measurement and comparison with the model.
- BPM noise  measurement.
- Beam position stability over long time (hour, day) for stored beam.
- Beam position stability for repeat injection (proper orbit closure).
- Beam Position vs. Beam Intensity measurement.
- Beam Position vs. Injection Phase Error measurement.
- Position of 2.5 MHz beam with a large amount of debunched beam nearby.
- Position of debunched beam in the barrier bucket, leading and trailing edges.
- System sensitivity over a large range of RF voltage (Beam Position vs. Bunch Width measurement without barrier bucket).
- Test the transient response besides moving phase and TBT measurement.

## STATUS OF DDC CHANNEL TEST

- We have acquired two EchoTek ECDR-GC814 digital receiver board. Each DDC board replaces four channels of the BPM. Both the board has been tested on the test stand with 2.5 MHz test pulse. The following 8 channels of old BPM system (with log amps) were replaced with the DDC board:

- HP426, HP428, VP427, & VP429
- HP604, HP606, VP603, & VP605

- Several of the measurements described earlier (nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 9)  were made with these 8 channels. Studies described in nos. 7, 8 and 10 are in progress.

## 6mm

**VISUAL COMPARISON OF OLD BPM W/LOGAMP & NEW BPM W/DDC**

- Fast Time Plot with IBEAM=1.25E11

***New BPM’s w/DDC looks much quieter compared to the old BPM system.***

- 12mm

**6mm**

**-6mm**

**HP226 Present Log amps**

**HP428 w/DDC**

**VP429 w/DDC**

**VP427 w/DDC**

## HP428

- Six different injections  with IBEAM~2.4E11. Fast time plot for each data set for about 12mts. No correction elements were moved. Beam position “as recorded” changed. Saturation of BPM preamps. To be fixed when we get the tunnel access. **(FIXED)**

**SATURATION OF PREAMPS IN THE NEW BPM SYSTEM**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**HP426**

**3:43AM  **

**4:52AM**

**20mm**

## HP428

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**HP426**

- 6 different injections.  3 w/IBEAM~2.4E11. 3 w/IBEAM~1.25E11. Beam position is very stable  for IBEAM~1.25E11. Variation in positions could be seen for IBEAM~2.4E11. Saturation effect. Each data set is for ~12 mts. **The thickness of the trace is not noise. These are 29 ramps.**

**IBEAM = 2.4E11**

- 1.25E11

- 1.25E11

**SATURATION OF PREAMPS IN THE NEW BPM SYSTEM**

**16:52**

**18:10**

**20mm**

##   MI    RR RF Alignment

**  ****MI    RR RF Alignment**

## IBEAM = 1.25E11

**DISPERSION MEASUREMENT NOMINAL FREQ = 52810196**

**HP426 **

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

- RMS=18m

- RMS=27m

- RMS=13m

- RMS=18m

**IBEAM = 1.25E11**

## DISPERSION MEASUREMENT

**DISPERSION MEASUREMENT**

- Nominal Frequency = 52810196

- Changed Frequency = 52810696

**Change by +500**

## IBEAM = 1.10E11

** ****DISPERSION  MEASUREMENT NOMINAL FREQ + 500 = 52810696**

**HP426**

- RMS=12m

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

- RMS=15m

- RMS=8m

- RMS=12m

**IBEAM = 1.10E11**

## DISPERSION MEASUREMENT

**DISPERSION MEASUREMENT**

- Nominal Frequency = 52810196

- Changed Frequency = 52809696

**Change by -500**

**HP426**

- RMS=22m

**HP428**

- RMS=25m

**VP427  **

- RMS=12m

**VP429**

- RMS=18m

**IBEAM = 0.95E11**

**DISPERSION MEASUREMENT NOMINAL FREQ - 500 = 52809696**

## DISPERSION MEASUREMENT

| BPM Position | Frequency Change | IBEAM  | Calculated Dispersion | MAD predicted value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HP426 | +500 | 2.40E11 | 1.80m | 1.79m |
| HP426 | +500         | 1.10E11 | 1.81m | 1.79m |
| HP426 | -500 | 0.95E11 | 1.78m | 1.79m |
| HP428 | +500 | 2.40E11 | 1.60m | 1.62m |
| HP428 | +500 | 1.10E11 | 1.60m | 1.62m |
| HP428 | -500 | 0.95E11 | 1.59m | 1.62m |

**DISPERSION MEASUREMENT**

**    ****THE VERTICALS SHOWED ALMOST NO CHANGE**

##   RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY

**  ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY**

- RF Voltage lowered by 50%. FARBG2 changed from 0.8 to about 0.4

## IBEAM = 2E11

**HP426**

- RMS=16m

**  ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 50%.**

**VP427**

**HP428**

**VP429**

- RMS=34m

- RMS=18m

- RMS=23m

**No difference in data quality. **

**IBEAM = 2E11**

## HP426

**HP426**

**VP429**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**  ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 50%**

- FARBG2 changed from 0.8 to 0.4. No difference in data quality. Some beam can be visibly seen outside the RF buckets on MI channel 17.

##   RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 87%.

**  ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 87%.**

- RF Voltage lowered by 87%. FARBG2 changed from 0.8 to about 0.1.
**RF Bunches barely visible on MI Ch17.**

## IBEAM = 2E11

**HP426**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**IBEAM = 2E11**

- RMS=144m

- RMS=126m

- RMS=59m

- RMS=76m

** ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 87%.**

- Wider RMS but the mean remains within the error.

##  RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 87%.

** ****RF VOLTAGE vs. STABILITY. VOLTAGE LOWERED BY 87%.**

** ****VP427**

**  ****HP426**

**VP429**

** ****HP428**

- FARBG2 changed from 0.8 to 0.1. Noisy measurement but measurement still possible.

**SYSTEM IS INSENSITIVE TO A LARGE RANGE OF RF VOLTAGE.**

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**18:50**

**19:20**

- Repeated injection with different IBEAM of 1.25E11, 5E10, 2E10, 9E9, 4E9 and 2.5E9 and then went back to IBEAM of 5E10, 1.25E11 and 2.47E11

**HP426**

**VP429**

**HP428**

**VP427**

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**19:35**

** ****20:00**

- Beam position for all the four BPM’s are very stable for different injections with different beam intensity.

**HP426**

**VP429**

**HP428**

**VP427**

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**20:30**

**21:00**

- Beam position does not change as we make fresh injections with varying beam intensity.

**HP426**

**VP429**

**HP428**

**VP427**

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**21:00**

**21:30**

- As the beam intensity goes down the rms of the distribution widens but still the mean beam position is within errors.

**HP426**

**VP429**

**HP428**

**VP427**

## HP426

**HP426**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

- RMS=19m

- RMS=9m

- RMS=18m

- RMS=13m

**IBEAM = 1.24E11 RMS =  10 – 20 ********m**

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**HP426**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

- RMS=70m

- RMS=24m

- RMS=57m

- RMS=29m

**IBEAM = 2.0E10 RMS = 25 – 70 ********m**

## HP426

**HP426**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**IBEAM = 8.0E9 RMS = 50–100 ********m**

- RMS=98m

- RMS=48m

- RMS=102m

- RMS=52m

## HP426

**HP426**

**HP428**

**VP427**

**VP429**

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

**IBEAM = 2.5E9 RMS = 140- 325 ********m**

**Wider distributions, larger rms’s, but the beam position is still consistent within the measured error.**

- RMS=311m

- RMS=142m

- RMS=323m

- RMS=163m

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY  FOR   REPEAT INJECTION**

- Fast Time Plot for IBEAM = 2.5E9. The distribution is noisy (larger rms) but the beam position is clearly measurable.

## BEAM POSITION STABILITY OVER 100 mts FOR CIRCULATING BEAM 

| IBEAM |   HP426 | HP428 | VP427 |    VP429 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.40E11 | -7.275±0.017 | 2.955±0.113 | 2.190±0.053 | -1.716±0.023 |
| 2.34E11 | -7.290±0.010 | 3.192±0.037 | 2.286±0.017 | -1.713±0.015 |
| 2.30E11 | -7.291±0.012 | 3.239±0.029 | 2.311±0.013 | -1.719±0.020 |
| 2.26E11 | -7.291±0.009 | 3.241±0.018 | 2.312±0.008 | -1.716±0.013 |
| 2.22E11 | -7.286±0.010 | 3.240±0.022 | 2.313±0.011 | -1.718±0.016 |
| 2.19E11 | -7.285±0.013 | 3.234±0.030 | 2.310±0.015 | -1.718±0.021 |
| 2.17E11 | -7.278±0.013 | 3.230±0.028 | 2.310±0.014 | -1.712±0.020 |
| 2.13E11 | -7.273±0.014 | 3.226±0.031 | 2.310±0.016 | -1.714±0.022 |

**BEAM POSITION STABILITY OVER 100 mts FOR CIRCULATING BEAM **

**Each measurement was taken for about 12 minutes. Beam position is very stable. RMS varies between 10-********m. In red, wider distribution (larger RMS) due to BPM saturation. Not a problem.**

##       LINEARITY STUDY

| BPM Position | Measured Slope mm/amp | MAD Prediction @corrector mm/amp (within ±10% )   |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HP426 | 4.21 | 4.66 |
| HP428 | 4.49 | 4.66 |
| VP427 | 3.22 | 3.46 |
| VP429 | 2.72 | 2.99 |

- Linearity was measured at 6 different beam intensities of 1.2E11, 5E10, 1.5E10,  8E9, 4E9 and 2E9 respectively. The response was found to be linear  and the slope was identical for a particular BPM at all intensities.

## LINEARITY STUDY

**LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

-   -3                amp                 2

- 3

- -17

- mm

- IBEAM = 1.2E11

##  LINEARITY STUDY

** ****LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

- -3                amp                 2

-   3

-  -17

- mm

- IBEAM = 5E10

## LINEARITY STUDY

**LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

-    -3                amp               2

-      3

-   -17

- mm

- IBEAM = 1.5E10

##    LINEARITY STUDY

**   ****LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

-  -3               amp                2

-     3

-    -17

- mm

-   IBEAM = 8E9

## LINEARITY STUDY

**LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

- -3                amp               2

-     3

-     -17

- mm

- IBEAM = 4E9

##  LINEARITY STUDY

** ****LINEARITY STUDY**

- HP426

-    -3                amp                 2

-   3

-     -17

-  mm

- IBEAM = 2E9

##    RF PHASE RESPONSE

**   ****RF PHASE RESPONSE**

- Without barrier buckets, 2.5MHz only.

- FARBP2 changed from 36 to 34 buckets at 205 sec.

**NO CHANGE IN BEAM POSITION**

##      RF PHASE RESPONSE

**     ****RF PHASE RESPONSE**

- Without barrier buckets, 2.5MHz only.

- FARBP2 changed from 36 to 38 buckets at 255 sec.

**NO CHANGE IN BEAM POSITION**

##  RF PHASE RESPONSE

** ****RF PHASE RESPONSE**

- Without barrier buckets, 2.5MHz only.

- FARBP2 changed slowly from 36 to 32 buckets.

**NO CHANGE IN BEAM POSITION**

## RF PHASE RESPONSE

**RF PHASE RESPONSE**

- Without barrier buckets, 2.5MHz only.

- FARBP2 changed slowly from 36 to 26 buckets.

**NO CHANGE IN BEAM POSITION**

##   RF PHASE RESPONSE

**  ****RF PHASE RESPONSE**

- Without barrier buckets, 2.5MHz only.

- FARBP2 changed from 36 to 26 buckets abruptly.

**The BPM’s became noisy and the noise stays.**

##  RF PHASE RESPONSE w/o BARRIER BUCKETS

** ****RF PHASE RESPONSE w/o BARRIER BUCKETS**

- FARBP2 decreased from 36 to 0, one 53MHz bucket at a time. Observed no drastic change in the beam positions but the positions show "transient noise" while the delay was changed. The positions shifted slightly as the delay was decreased by more than 16 buckets.

**VP429**

**HP426**

**VP427**

**HP428**

## Conclusion: We consider two buckets to be the “upper limit” for phase misalignment. When phase is changed slowly by several buckets (from 36 to 34, from 36 to 38, from 36 to 32or from from 36 to 26) the beam position does not change. The positions shifted slightly as the delay was decreased by more than 16 buckets. When the phase is shifted suddenly by several buckets, the noise increases on all the BPM’s and it does not go away. This may be because some beam spilled out of the bucket. 

- Conclusion: We consider two buckets to be the “upper limit” for phase misalignment. When phase is changed slowly by several buckets (from 36 to 34, from 36 to 38, from 36 to 32or from from 36 to 26) the beam position does not change. The positions shifted slightly as the delay was decreased by more than 16 buckets. When the phase is shifted suddenly by several buckets, the noise increases on all the BPM’s and it does not go away. This may be because some beam spilled out of the bucket.

## We believe that these “8 test channels” have good stability, good linearity and good resolution. The preamp gain was modified to address the saturation issue and it made 5-7E9 the lower intensity limit. We re-did most of the measurements after proper gain modification and the system looks robust.

## WHAT MORE TESTS NEED TO BE DONE?

- Re-check the resolution and gain scale (histograms and three bumps) after gain modification throughout the specified dynamic range of current. **(DONE)**
- Test the transient response besides moving the RF phase with TBT measurement.
- Absolute Calibration – measure offset, scale correctness and long term consistency.
- Integrate MDAT decoder into the system.

## TASKS &  SCHEDULE

- Install the modified pre-amps, transition and DDC modules for the 4 test channels by 10/01 (Peter Prieto -  4 channels done).
- Finish front-end software by 10/07 (Duane Voy – done).
- Finish DAQ software by 10/07 (Tom Meyer – done).
- Finish MDAT decoder integration into the current system by 10/18 (Craig McClure – still working - to be done).
- Make measurements with the test channels and determine whether the performance meets the requirements. (Brajesh Choudhary and Martin Hu) (mostly done by 10/24). Some more work needs to be done.

##    TASKS &  SCHEDULE

- Make decision on which and how many  BPM’s to replace and place the order for technical components by 10/30 – Mishra, Choudhary & Crisp.
- It was agreed that if the test boards meet the specification, log amps associated with 216 BPM’s in the RR and 14 BPM’s each in both the transfer lines will be replaced. This will require 244 channels or 61 digital receiver card. Warren Shappert needs 4 digital boards for his BLT’s. It was agreed to buy a total of 70 DDC boards.
- 9.   Try to install the crates, transition modules, cables etc. by 01/15/03 (Peter Prieto).

**   ****TASKS &  SCHEDULE**

##        TASKS &  SCHEDULE

- Before January 03 shutdown make modification to all the   preamps (Peter Prieto).
- 11. All the DDC’s should be available within 12-14 weeks of placing the order (hopefully by 2/15/03). Test all the DDC cards on bench within 6 weeks of arrival (by 3/20/03).
- 12. Complete tunnel calibration work during the shutdown (Peter Prieto).
- 13. Install and test (hardware and software) in the service building by 4/07/03 – Peter Prieto, Tom Meyer and Duane Voy.
- 14. Test, certify, run  and integrate the new system by 4/21/03 – ALL.

##         COST ESTIMATE

**1.     Prototype test                                 $  30K  **
**2.     70 EchoTek DDC card                  $ 525K   ($7.5K/card)                        **
**3.     Other Related Items                      $ 270K********
**4.     EchoTek Test stand                       $    1K**
**5.     Preamp upgrade                             $    2.5K**

**Total    $ 828.5K**

- **  Other related items include VME64x crates, 2401  PowerPC, PMC UCD clock decoder, IPTSG, Digital I/O Board, rack top fan out cables etc.

- Cost Estimated with Jim Crisp & Sergio Zimmermann.

## SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS

**Three bump scale and linearity was measured.  It agrees with the MAD model.**
**BPM noise was measured for the beam intensity of 1E10 to 40E10 and the measured noise is within the specified range.**
**The beam position was found to be stable over long time (about 100 minutes) for the stored beam. **
**The beam position was found to be stable within rms for repeat injection at different beam intensities.**
**Beam Position vs. Injection Phase Error was measured and it was  found that the beam position is not very sensitive to slow & small phase change.**
**System sensitivity was measured over a large range of RF voltage and the system was found to be insensitive to a large voltage change.**

## SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS

**Position of 2.5 MHz beam with a large amount of debunched beam nearby.**
**Position of debunched beam in the barrier bucket, leading and trailing edges. (After MDAT system is incorporated)**
**Test the transient response besides moving phase and  TBT measurement.**

**SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS**

***Still to Do:***