# Presentation: 916822

-  Synoptic situation
-  Modern Forecasts of 1953 storm(‘ReForecasting’)
-  Expand in three ways:
- a) Barotropic Forecasts
- b) Initial error hand vs present analysis (’53 data)
- c) (nearly) Contemporary UK NWP for ’53 case
- Acknowledge Anders Persson about point c.

-  The 1953 North Sea Gale in Perspective of Historical NWP efforts.
-              H. M. van den Dool, R.E. Kistler and S. Saha, at NCEP

## Mean Sea Level Pressure Maps for Jan 29 – Feb 1, 1953, every 3 hours  from NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis (Kalnay et al 1996; Kistler 2001

##                                            29/0

-                                            29/0

## 30/0

## 31/0

## 01/0

## From Hay, R. F. M., and J. Laing, 1954: The storm of 31st January - 1st February 1953. Mar. Obs., 24, 87-91.

- From Hay, R. F. M., and J. Laing, 1954: The storm of 31st January - 1st February 1953. _Mar. Obs._, 24, 87-91.

## Height fields Jan  28 - Feb 1, 1953 every 6 hours (Reanalysis)

## Slide 34

## Slide 35

## Slide 37

## Slide 38

## Slide 39

## Slide 40

## Slide 41

## Slide 42

## Slide 43

## Slide 44

- To be sure: This disaster was not just meteorology1) Oceanography, wind stress effect, Kelvin waves and astronomical tides, wind waves2) ‘Coastal’ defense, and its maintenance3) Preparedness, warning system, protocol, bureaucracy, communications, evacuation4) Assessing the risk of a given surge forecast

## Forecasts valid for Feb, 1, 1953, 3Z

- Reanalysis model T62L28

## Slide 48

## Slide 49

## Slide 50

## Slide 51

## Slide 52

## Slide 55

## The previous map is a contemporaneous hand analysis, digitized at 2.5 by 2.5 grid. The original looks like this:

## Source: KNMI, F. H. Schmidt- editor,1960: Meteorologische en Oceanografische aspecten van stormvloeden op de Nederlandse kust. Bijdrage tot het rapport van de Deltacommissie door het KNMI. Staatsdrukkerij- en Uitgeverijbedrijf - ‘s Gravenhage. pp200. 

- Source: KNMI, F. H. Schmidt- editor,1960: Meteorologische en Oceanografische aspecten van stormvloeden op de Nederlandse kust. Bijdrage tot het rapport van de Deltacommissie door het KNMI. Staatsdrukkerij- en Uitgeverijbedrijf - ‘s Gravenhage. pp200.

-  Synoptic situation
-  Modern Forecasts of 1953 storm (‘ReForecasting’) by NCEP(several resolutions; ETA), ECMWF(several resolutions), Hirlam
-  Expand in three ways for Historical NWP aspects:
- a) Barotropic Forecasts
- b) Initial error: hand-analysis vs Re-analysis (’53 data)
- c) (nearly) contemporary UK NWP of ’53 case

## dAVA (global barotropic) forecasts

- /t (ζ’-λ2ψ’) = - Vn .ζ’ - V’. (ζn + f + ζ’)      			   - D4 ζ’- K ζ’,
- where Vn and ζn refer to climatological mean flow, and ζ’ is ‘anomaly’ vorticity.
- T30L1
- Cressman-Bolin correction applied to anomaly. Parameter λ2  found thru adjoint study (Rinne et al 1993)
- 1980’s type barotropic model

## Slide 61

## Slide 62

## Slide 63

## Slide 64

## Verification by numbers (Anomaly Correlation 500 mb height)

## Slide 66

## Slide 67

## On the initial error

- ‘hand’analysis minus Re-analysis is ~2mb/25gpm for MSLP/Z500 respectively. Atl-Eu domain for 1953 data.
- CDAS/Reanalysis (T62L28) has currently (Jan):
-     1.5mb/12.0gpm  (0hr, fit to radiosondes)
-     1.8mb/18.1gpm  (6hr, guess to obs) (EuroAtl)
-     It is (?) amazing that the initial error for 1953 Reanl, with so much less data than in 2004, is not even a factor of 2 larger.

- INITIAL
- 30 jan 15Z

- 31 jan 15Z  (anl)

- +24 hr barotropic forecasts

- QJ 1958

- Analysis 31 Jan 15Z 1953, 500mb(ft)

- +24 hr by Sawyer_Bushby model

- 24 hr forecast of 500mb height by Sawyer_Bushby
- Model, verifying Jan 31 15Z, Met Magazine
- 1954

## “If the Sawyer-Bushby forecast had been right, the calamity would have been a lot more calamitous than it already was”.             Free after ‘Discussion’(1954) and Hinds(1981).

## Slide 73

## Slide 74

## Slide 76

## Water Level Forecast 12 Hours

-                  _***Conclusions:***_
- Accurate barotropic forecast are possible out to 30 hrs (i.e. after the bomb had developed)
- Differences between hand analysis and Reanalysis are ~ 2mb and 25gpm (1953 data coverage). Jan2003 CDAS errors are ~1.6mb/15gpm.
- There are a few early NWP efforts with regard to the storm of 1953. Jan 30/31 15Z was one of the canned cases used at UKMO. Bushby-Sawyer +24hr forecast was remarkable!

## A KNMI initiated warning system, implemented in 1916 (following a previous flood)Three options:1) Say nothing (benign circumstances)2) Warn for significantly enhanced water levels for the next two astronomical high tides (by region)3) Warn for dangerously enhanced water levels for the next one astronomical high tide. Saturday Jan 31 at 10am: option 2 warning was issued Saturday Jan 31 17:15 (they had to wait until after the afternoon high tide, in order to ‘avoid confusion’): option 3 (for the first time in history) (Warnings were issued to other authorities (supposedly they knew what to do), and to the public via radio at 18:00 onward. Note there was no radio after midnight. Zero communication during the disaster.)

## RMS-errors of MRF(GFS) forecasts, and initial errors.

-                                                                                   Z500
-   Lead — >	     0	24	48	72	96 hr	climo			                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------                 	        	    30 Jan 3Z	     0(28)	24	43	57	96	140 	31 Jan 3Z	     0(27)	34	54	68	95	129     	          01 Feb 3Z	     0(22)	24	57	73	108	137 gpm 					MSLP Lead — >	     0	24	48	72	96 hr 	climo        	     -------------------------------------------------------------    30 Jan  3Z	    0(1.8)	3.2	5.2	7.4	9.6	10.731 Jan  3Z	    0(2.0)	4.1	6.7	8.1	7.4	12.8
-                  01 Feb  3Z	    0(2.4)	2.9	6.3	6.7	9.8	15.1  mbar