# Presentation: 384550

## INDEXES

**INDEXES**

*** ****Aeronautical Accidents  until  10/31/2008. **

**Source: CENIPA and ANP**

|   | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number of accidents | 67 | 58 | 68 | 62 | 58 | 68 | 99 | 73 |
| Fuel Consumption by m3 | 4.889.084 | 4.499.717 | 4.031.299 | 4.270.828 | 4.484.939 | 4.518.224 | 4.945.341 | 4.439.574** |

**** includes estimated value for October**

**Notes:**
O número de acidentes foi atualizado até 31/08/08 pela GGIP e os consumos de julho e agosto foram estimados em função do crescimento médio mensal entre 2007 e 2008.

## Slot distribution at congested airports

***AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE AVIAÇÃO CIVIL***

**15.05.08**

**December 2****nd**** ,  2008.**

_**5th Annual FAA International Aviation Safety Forum**_

## Congested Airports

**Definition: **
- Airports using 90% or more of the apron or runway during workdays  are considered congested.

## Proposal - Results

**Allow and regulate the entrance of new Airlines at congested airports; **
**Increase competition;**
**Improve the system’s operational efficiency; **
**Airlines that perform better will get more slots.**

## Scenario: Congonhas Airport (São Paulo)

**The airport in passengers movement.**
- 10,3 million passengers ~ 14% of total passengers;
- Only one runway;
- Capacity: 15 pairs of slots per hour;
- Completely busy.
**Has some of the most profitable flights in the country.**
**Concentration and low competition.**
- The two largest airlines have 89% of the airport slots and 93% of the national market.
- No perspective of entrance for other airlines.

## Slots Distribution at Congonhas 

## Proposal

**New rule based on qualification index will be implemented in two phases.**
- Every two years, two kinds of distribution:

## Qualification Index (QI)

**The Qualification Index will be composed of three indicators:**
- Delays.
- Cancellations.
- Number of incidents and accidents.

## Entrants

**Each airline’s indicators will be compared to the sector’s average. **
**Airlines with better than average indicators receives 1 point. **
**To qualify as a entrant, the airline should have at least 2 points.**

## Slot Distribution

**Distribution will be calculated using formulas that consider the amount of airlines that intend to operate at the airport.**

***A – ******Amount of current operators .***
***E – Amount of entrants.***** **

## Distribution – First Phase

- Each current operator will hand over the same amount of slots to the entrant.
- The limit will be 20% of total current operator’s slot.

## Basic chart

## Redistribution - Second Phase

***Second Phase******.***

## Current Operator

- There will be a Performance Index (PI) that uses the same indicators:
- Delays;
- Cancellations;
- Accidents or Incidents.
-  General Criteria:
- PI above average – gains slots.
- PI below average – loses slots.

## Simulation

**Example for 5 Current Operators, 4 Entrants and 250 pairs of slots.**
**PI **average** = 0,52**
- Slots to be distributed: **FRA = 11,11%.**

- FRA = 1/(A+E)

## Simulation

**First step: calculate the amount of slots to be lost by Current Operators with bad performance**

## Simulation

**13 slots will be equally redistributed among Current Operators with performance above average.**
- Current Operator A: Receives 6 pairs of slots.
- Current Operator B: Receives 6 pairs of slots.
**One slot left...**
- It will be given to the airline that has the highest performance.
- Current Operator A: 7 pairs of slots
- Current Operator B: 6 pairs of slots.

## Conclusion 

**New airlines at congested airports.**
**More options for the consumers.**
**Improvement in service quality and operational safety.**
- Airlines must improve their indicators of delays, cancellations and safety.
**More competition in the sector. **

## THANK YOU!

**Ms. Solange Vieira**
**presidencia@anac.gov.br**
**Director-President of ANAC**
**Brazil**

## Slide 20