# Presentation: 323881

## U.S. Election Assistance CommissionOffice of Inspector General

**AUDITING HAVA FUNDS**
**Roger La Rouche, Deputy Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Election Assistance Commission**

## Getting Started:

**Call the State **
**Arrange for starting in about three weeks**
**Send formal announcement letter to chief state election official**

## Announcement Letter:

**States the audit objectives**
**Asks for office space for two auditors**
**Asks for telephone and data lines for two computers**
**Lists the information we plan to examine.**

## Information to be Examined:

**All audit reports and other reviews related to the Office’s financial management systems and the HAVA program for the last 2 years.**
**Policies, procedures and regulations for the Office’s accounting, personnel, payroll, property, and procurement systems as they relate to the Bureau’s administration of HAVA funds and programs.**

## Information to be Examined:

**An organizational chart of the Office and a list of all full and part-time employees of the Office indicating those employees whose salary is financed with HAVA funds.  (If applicable, also identify other employees from the State whose salary is paid in full or in part with HAVA funds).**
**Time sheets/certifications of work performed for full time and part time HAVA employees.**
**Inventory list of all equipment purchased with HAVA funds.**

## Information to be Examined:

**Contract and procurement files for major procurements (i.e. voter registration system and election systems).**
**Source/supporting documents for payments made with HAVA funds.**
**List of all agreements providing HAVA funds to counties. **
**County financial reports submitted to the Office.**

## Information to be Examined:

**State laws that established and impact the election fund.**
**Description of Office’s methods of accounting for any income, such as revenue from equipment leases, generated by HAVA programs.**
**Identification of the expenditure of funds in fiscal year 2000 for the level of effort for section 251-type activities and the support for those expenditures.**

## Information to be Examined:

**Appropriations and expenditure reports for State funds used to maintain the level of expenses for elections at least equal to the amount expended in fiscal year 2000 and to meet the five percent matching requirement for section 251 requirements payments.**
**Source/supporting documents for the maintenance of effort and matching contributions.**

## Criteria:

_**HAVA **_
**Identifies activities for which funds may be used and **
**conditions for receipt of funds, such as matching, maintenance of effort, and election fund requirements for 251 payments.**
_**EAC Guidance**_
***HAVA FUNDS MANAGING, RECORDKEEPING, REPORTING, AND AUDITING***** and EAC’s frequently asked questions. **
_**Other Federal Guidance**_
**U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, *****Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments*****.**
**Common Rule, *****Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State****** ******and Local Governments***** (41CFR 105-71).**

## Preparatory Work:

| Review Financial Status Reports (SF 269s) | Determine amounts spent, kinds of expenditures, and interest reported. |
| --- | --- |
| Read State Plan
 | Learn about program and if/how funds delivered to counties. |
| Review Prior Audits | Identify issues and determine if scope of our audit will be curtailed. |
| Check State Website | Get pertinent laws and regulations and information on procurement and property management. |

## Field Work - Expenditures:

| Record Keeping | Are there separate accounts to track the uses of 101, 102, and 251 funds?
Do the amounts reported on the 269s agree with the accounting records? |
| --- | --- |
| Audit Tests | Are salaries adequately supported?
Are indirect costs properly charged?
Are purchases competitively made?
Is equipment adequately safeguarded and tracked? |
| County Expenditures | If  a state granted funds to its counties, the same questions are answered for the county activities. |

## Fieldwork - Compliance:

| ELECTION FUND

Is there a state election fund?

Have all HAVA payments been deposited in the fund?

Has the state match been properly computed and deposited into the fund?

Has interest been earned and properly recorded?

Is use of the fund restricted to 251-related activities?
 |
| --- |

## Fieldwork - Compliance:

- MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT
**Has the state quantified the amount spent on 251-type expenditures for fiscal year 2000?**
**Can the state demonstrate that it has subsequently maintained the level of state expenditures for such activities?**

## Fieldwork - Compliance:

**MATCHING**
**HAVA section 253 (b)(5):  “The State has appropriated funds for carrying out the activities for which the requirements payment is made in an amount equal to 5 percent of the total amount to be spent for such activities (taking into account the requirements payments and the amount spent by the State) . . .“**
**Requirements payment equals $40,000,000.**
**Wrong - -  $40,000,000 x 5% = $2,000,000.**
**Right - - $40,000,000/95% = $42,105,263.**
**               ****$42,105,263 x 5% =  $2,105,263.**

## Communications:

| Notification of Findings and Recommendations | Auditors give state written summaries of findings and recommendations for feedback while  on site. |
| --- | --- |
| Exit Conference | Auditors brief state on all reportable matters upon leaving the audit site. |
| Draft Audit Report | Auditors issue non-public draft  report to state which requests written comments within 30 days.  |
| Final Audit Report | Auditors, after receipt of comments,  issue public final report to EAC recommending that it ensure that all matters are resolved. |

## Findings:

| Description | CA | NJ | GA | TX | IL | SC | PA |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Non-Competitive Contracting | √ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Unsupported Salaries | √ | √ |  |  |  |  | √ |
| Unsupported Transactions – non salary | √ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Improper Election Fund |  |  | √ |  |  |  |  |
| Incomplete Records of Equipment |  | √ |  |  | √ | √ | √ |
| Unaccounted for Program Income |  |  |  | √ |  |  |  |
| Undocumented Maintenance of Effort |  |  |  |  |  | √ | √ |
| Unapproved Equipment Purchase | √ |  |  |  |  | √ |  |
| Understated Match |  |  |  |  | √ | √ |  |
| Lost Interest |  |  |  |  | √ | √ |  |
| Insufficient Monitoring of County Activities |  | √ |  |  |  |  |  |
| Ineligible Activities | √ |  |  |  | √ |  |  |
| Incorrect Indirect Costs | √ | √ |  | √ |  |  |  |
| Weak Cash Management for County Grants |  |  |  |  | √ |  |  |

## Dollar Impacts:

| 

STATE | QUESTIONED COSTS |  |  |  | 

UNDER MATCH | 

INTEREST |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 

TOTAL | EAC DISPOSITION |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | REPAID TO STATE FUND | REPAID TO FEDERAL TREASURY | 
REIN-
STATED |  |  |
| CA | $3,860,361 | $2,484,992 | $536,122 | $839,247 | $0 | $0 |
| NJ | 131,924 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |
| GA | 0 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |
| TX | 180,609 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |
| IL | 3,889 |  |  |  | 189,223 | 227,996 |
| SC | 92,560 |  |  |  | 85,319 | 29,475 |
| PA | 562,513 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |