# Presentation: 524309

## Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.

## WATER QUALITY IN BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVEAND EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK--

**Trends and Spatial **
**Characteristics of**
**Selected **
**Constituents**

## Major features and sampling sites in Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park

**Major features and sampling sites in ****Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park**

## METHODS AND APPROACH

**METHODS AND ****APPROACH**

**Data collected primarily by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the   U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).**
**For analysis of trends, we focused on specific conductance, chloride, sulfate, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen at sites with the longest record of water-quality data.**
**For trend analysis, we used the USGS S-ESTREND software--uncensored seasonal Kendall test for specific conductance, chloride, and total nitrogen, and Tobit regression test for sulfate and total phosphorus (which  have numerous data reported at "less-than" values).**
**For evaluation of spatial patterns in water    quality, we used median concentrations  of selected constituents over a 10-year baseline period (1991-2000).**

**Long-term changes in water levels, flows, water management, and upstream land use can affect water quality in BICY and EVER, based on analysis of available data (1960-2000).**
**Specific  conductance and concentrations of chloride increased in Taylor Slough and Shark River Slough (P-33)  over the period of record: for example, chloride concentrations more than doubled from 1960 to 1990 (see graphs), primarily due to greater canal transport of high-dissolved solids water into the sloughs.  Chloride did not show a long-term trend at the Everglades reference site P-34 or at Bridge 105 in BICY****.**

**Chloride Concentrations ****and Loess Smooth Line**

## Total Phosphorus, Shark River Slough at P33

**Total Phosphorus, ****Shark River Slough at P33**

**Some of the long-term trends in sulfate and total phosphorus were likely attributable to high percentages of “less-than” and zero values and to changes in reporting levels over the period of record, rather than to real environmental changes.**

## Total Phosphorus Concentration versus Water Level, Shark River Slough at P33

**Total Phosphorus Concentration versus Water Level, Shark River Slough at P33**

**High spikes in nutrient concentrations were evident during dry periods and attributable to increased canal inflows of water that is nutrient-rich relative to marsh inflows, to increased nutrient releases from break-down of organic bottom sediment, or to increased build-up of nutrient waste from concentrations of aquatic biota and wildlife in remaining ponds.**

## Water Level in Big Cypress Swamp, Concentrations of Total Phosphorus (multiplied times 1,000), and Sulfate (multiplied times 100), Tamiami Trail at Bridge 105

**Water Level in Big Cypress Swamp, ****Concentrations of Total Phosphorus ****(multiplied times 1,000), and ****Sulfate (multiplied times 100), ****Tamiami Trail at Bridge 105**

## Long-term changes in water quality over the period of record are less pronounced in the western Everglades and the Big Cypress Swamp, however, seasonal and drought-related changes are evident.

- Water quality varies spatially across  the region because of natural variations in geology, hydrology,  and vegetation, and because of differences in water management and land use.

## Concentrations of total phosphorus generally are higher in Big Cypress Swamp (median values, 1991-2000, were mostly above 0.015 mg/L) than in the Everglades (median values, 1991-2000, mostly below 0.01 mg/L), probably because of higher phosphorus in natural sources such as shallow soils, rocks, and ground water in the Big Cypress region than in the Everglades region.

**Total Phosphorus**

## Sulfate Concentrations

- Concentrations of sulfate, on the other hand, are higher in EVER (median values in Shark River Slough, 1991-2000, mostly above 2 mg/L sulfate), than in BICY (median values, 1991-2000, less than 1 mg/L sulfate), probably because of the canal transport system that conveys more water from agricultural sources into EVER than into BICY.

**Sulfate Concentrations**

## Chloride Concentrations

## Trace elements and contaminants such as pesticides and other toxic organics are in relatively low concentrations in BICY and EVER compared with concentrations in parts of the northern Everglades which are near agricultural and urban sources.

- Most frequently detected pesticides and other organics in water at sites in
- and near EVER and BICY.  Concentrations in ug/L.

## Analysis of Historical Water-Quality DataLoxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge,Fiscal Year 2004-05

**Analysis of Historical Water-Quality Data****Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge,****Fiscal Year 2004-05**

## Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge

**Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge**

## Assessment of Groundwater Input and Biogeochemical Characteristics of theLoxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem,New project, Fiscal Year 2003-05

**Assessment of ****Groundwater Input ****and Biogeochemical Characteristics of the****Loxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem,****New project, ****Fiscal Year 2003-05**

## Assessment of Groundwater Input and Biogeochemical Characteristics of theLoxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem

**Assessment of Groundwater Input and Biogeochemical Characteristics of the****Loxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem**

**OBJECTIVES:**
**Characterize wet season and dry season groundwater fluxes in the river using Radium isotopes.**
**Evaluate biogeochemical characteristics of shallow groundwater and pore water on vegetative transects along the north west fork of the river.**

## Assessment of Groundwater Input and Biogeochemical Characteristics of theLoxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem

**Assessment of Groundwater Input and Biogeochemical Characteristics of the****Loxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem**

**Principal Investigators:**
**   ****Peter Swarzenski ---- GW Flux**
**   ****Bill Orem --------------- Biogeochemical Characteristics**
**   ****Ben McPherson ------ Historical Synthesis**

## Transect # 9

**Transect # 9**

**J. D. Park Picnic Area**

**1967 Taylor Alexander **
**Transect**

## Location of 10 Vegetation Transects from the Vegetation Monitoring Study

** ****Transects extend across the floodplain and some have a series of shallow groundwater monitoring wells **

**Location of 10 Vegetation Transects from the Vegetation Monitoring Study**

**1**

**2**

**3**

**5**

**7 4**

**6**

**8**

**9**

**10**