# Presentation: 734457

## Major Research InstrumentationEPSCoR PI MeetingNovember 6-9, 2007

**Office of Integrative Activities**
**National Science Foundation**

**Dr. Joan Frye**
**jfrye@nsf.gov ~ 703-292-8040****http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/programs/mri/**

## Slide 2

## Purpose

**The MRI program is designed to increase access to scientific and engineering equipment for research and research training in U.S. academic institutions.**
**The MRI program seeks to improve the quality and expand the scope of research and research training in science and engineering, and to foster the integration of research and education by providing instrumentation for research-intensive learning environments.**
**The MRI program encourages the development and acquisition of research instrumentation for shared use across academic departments, among research institutions, and in concert with private sector partners.**** **

## Goals

**Support the acquisition, through purchase, upgrade, or development, of major state-of-the-art instrumentation for research, research training, and integrated research/education activities at U.S. Institutions;**
**Improve access to and increase use of modern research and research training instrumentation by scientists, engineers, and graduate and undergraduate students;**
**Enable academic departments or cross-departmental units to create well-equipped learning environments that integrate research and education;**
**Foster the development of the next generation of instrumentation for research and research training; and**
**Promote partnerships between academic researchers and private sector instrument developers.**

## Eligible Institutions

**Ph.D. granting organizations**
- academic organizations that have produced more than 20 Ph.D.s or D. Sci’s in all NSF supported fields during the previous two academic years
**Non-Ph.D. granting organizations**
- two and four year colleges and universities that have produced 20 or fewer Ph.D.s or D.Sci’s in all NSF supported fields during the previous two academic years
**Non-degree granting organizations**
- independent non-profit research organizations, research museums, and consortia of eligible institutions

## Program Administration

**MRI solicitation (NSF 08-503)**
**Other MRI resources available --**
- FAQ’s
- lists of MRI awards (1997-2007)
- MRI presentations
**Proposals required to be submitted electronically using NSF FastLane system;**
**At time of submission, PI is asked to identify an NSF division to review proposal.**

## NSF 08-503 – FY 2008 MRI Solicitation

**FY 2008 significant changes:**
**Cost-sharing is required on proposals submitted by PhD granting institutions and non-degree granting institutions.**
**The upper limit has been raised to $4 million.  Requests over $2 million must be for the **_**acquisition**_** of **_**single**_** instruments only.  Letters of intent are required for all requests above $2 million.**
**Operation and maintenance support may be requested on acquisition proposals.  **
**Adherence to proposal margin, spacing and font size limitations, consistent with the NSF Grant Proposal Guide, will be strictly required and enforced.  **

## Evaluation Criteria

**Intellectual merit**
**Broader impacts of the proposed activity**
**Additional Review Criteria:**
**Plans for using the new or enhanced research capability in teaching, training or learning.**
**Management Plan.**
- For instrument development proposals**: Rationale for development of a new instrument.**
- For instrument acquisition proposals over $2 million:** Impact at the state or national level; plans for post-award funding of operation & maintenance**

## Actual Review Template

**What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?**How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
**What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?**How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
**Is management plan appropriate?**
**For instrument acquisition proposals**: Evaluate whether the plan: 1) includes sufficient infrastructure and technical expertise to allow effective usage of the instrument; and 2) provides organizational commitments for operations and maintenance.
**For instrument development proposals**: Evaluate whether the plan has a realistic schedule and mechanisms to deal with potential risks. In addition, evaluate the availability of appropriate technical expertise to design and construct the instrument and the cost of the new technology.
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
**Rationale for rating**

## 2007 Proposal and Award Snapshot

**Number of Proposals Reviewed: 774**
**Dollars Requested: $478,314,717**
**Number of Awards: 222**
**MRI Dollars Awarded: $89,361,469**
**NSF Dollars Awarded: $96,817,329**
**Success Rate: 28.7%**
**Average MRI Award: $402,529**
**Average NSF Award: $436,114**
**Number of Institutions that Participated: 430**
**Number of Institutions Awarded: 190**

## Proposal and Award Information 1998-20071

- ^first year cost-sharing was removed
- *includes MRI Congressional appropriations and directorate/office contributions
- **pending proposals were assumed to be non-awards
- 1  includes only awards submitted directly to MRI program and reviewed

## 2007 Proposals by Dollars Requested

_**Means**_
- All: $617,978
- Non-Degree: $616,649
- Non-Ph.D.: $346,972
- Ph.D.: $752,779
_**Medians**_
- All: $486,004
- Non-Degree: $532,840
- Non-Ph.D.: $307,330
- Ph.D.: $604,860

## 2007 Awards by Dollar Amount

_**Means**_
- All: $402,529
- Non-Degree: $499,354
- Non-Ph.D.: $242,549
- Ph.D.: $506,593
_**Medians**_
- All: $301,900
- Non-Degree: $266,600
- Non-Ph.D.: $205,808
- Ph.D.: $425,000

## 2007 Awards by Directorate

- 45 awards

- 17 awards

- 38 awards

- 29 awards

- 77 awards

- 8 awards

- 8 awards

## 2007 Number of Awards/Proposals by State

## Non-Ph.D. Granting Institutions

**FY 2007**
**Number of Proposals**
**	****Submitted: 255**
**Dollars Requested: $93,067,830**
**Number of Awards: 87**
**MRI Dollars Awarded: $21,101,761**
**NSF Dollars Awarded: $21,736,867**
**Success Rate: 34.1%**
**Average MRI Award: $224,549**
**Average NSF Award: $249,849**
**Number of States**
**	****Represented: 46^**
**Number of Institutions Represented: 193**

**FY 2006**
**Number of Proposals**
**	****Submitted: 270**
**Dollars Requested: $94,409,449**
**Number of Awards: 92**
**MRI Dollars Awarded: $19,478,024**
**NSF Dollars Awarded: $20,669,110**
**Success Rate: 34.1%**
**Average MRI Award: $211,718**
**Average NSF Award: $224,664**
**Number of States**
**	****Represented: 39***
**Number of Institutions**
**	****Represented: 192**

- ^ includes Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico

- *includes Puerto Rico

## Minority Serving Institution Definition

**Per U.S. Code 20, ****§1067k(3), “The term ‘minority institution’ means an institution of higher education whose enrollment of a single minority or a combination of minorities...exceeds 50 percent of the total enrollment”**
**Per U.S. Code 20, ****§1101a(5B), “The term ‘Hispanic-serving institution’ means an institution of higher education that...at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate full-time equivalent students that is at least 25 percent Hispanic students”**

## Minority Serving Institutions

**FY 2007**
**Number of Proposals**
**	****Submitted: 111**
**Dollars Requested: $58,827,822**
**Number of Awards: 36**
**MRI Dollars Awarded: $11,661,651**
**NSF Dollars Awarded: $11,914,978**
**Success Rate: 32.4%**
**Average MRI Award: $323,935**
**Average NSF Award: $330,972**
**Number of States**
**	****Represented: 30***
**Number of Institutions Represented: 69**

**FY 2006**
**Number of Proposals**
**	****Submitted: 66**
**Dollars Requested: $23,211,136**
**Number of Awards: 24**
**MRI Dollars Awarded: $4,823,738**
**NSF Dollars Awarded: $ 5,564,581**
**Success Rate: 36.4%**
**Average MRI Award: $ 200,989**
**Average NSF Award: $ 231,858**
**Number of States**
**	****Represented: 15^**
**Number of Institutions Represented: 41**

- ^ includes Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and    U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI)

- * includes Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico

## 2002 – 2007 MRI EPSCoR Proposals and Awards 

## 2002 – 2007 MRIEPSCoR vs. Non-EPSCoR States