BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 804184

## Run II CDF and D0 Detectors

- silicon, drift chamber,
- tile forward calorimeters,
- muon systems,
- front-end, trigger electronics
- software

- silicon, sci-fi central tracker,
- 2T magnet, preshower,
- muon systems,
- front-end, trigger electronics, software

- 7/29/2002

## Luminosity

- CDF/D0 : stable PHYSICS running established in early 2002

- Run I: (~0.1 fb-1)
- Run IIa Goals: (~2 fb-1)
- 	4 x 1031 cm-2s-1 (by fall 02)
-      ~1 x 1032 	           (by spring 03) 	     	      (“Recycler” as Accumulator)
- 	2 x 1032            (by end of 03)
- 	     (“Recycler” as Recycler)
- Run IIb Goals: (10~15 fb-1)
- 	4 x 1032 (electron cooling as well 		as stochastic cooling in Recyler)
- My expectation:
- Tevatron runs 1 year into LHC physics run.

- Today’s presentation: 10~20 pb -1 / expt. (~70 pb -1 / expt. delivered)
- 10~20% of Run I

- 7/29/2002

## Run II Physics has begun!

- _Re-establish Run I physics signals_
- prepare for high-PT program: Mtop, MW, sin2W, Higgs, SUSY, Z’, LED
- reconstruct leptons, W’s, Z’s, jets, b’s, ...
- t  Wb
- SM Higgs:	WH, ZH (H  bb) at MH < 135 GeV
- 			gg H WW, ZZ at MH > 135 GeV
- measure W, Z, AFB
- _Calibrate precision track measurements_
- exploit high cross-section signals; measure B lifetimes, masses
- begin B physics program (lifetimes, masses, Bs mixing, CP, b, Bc, ...)
- provide calibration/tools for MW, Mtop, b-jet tagging
- hugh charm signal - D0 Konline monitor

- 7/29/2002

## Run II Physics has begun! (cont.)

- _Exploit new trigger capabilities _
- Measure M(Ds,D+), Br(D0  KK, ) / Br(D0  K
- Learn to model trigger for B physics signals
- Reconstruct fully hadronic B decays: B  DB  hh
- Later searches for Higgs h/H/Abb, Zbb (calibration)
- _Exploit new particle ID capabilities_
- TOF (Identify p/ K/), dE/dx (Identify soft e/ p/ K/)
- Later searches for new particles (charged massive)

- 7/29/2002

## Experiments will guide Theory?

- _Anomalies in Run I data (CDF) _
-  Cross section at high ET jet
-  Top Dilepton - kinematics
-  ee  Missing ET - SUSY?
-  W + 2-b jets - excess

- 7/29/2002

## W / Z Cross Sections

- typical  decay multiplicity
- : important for new physics

- CDF+D0: 20k We1k Zee

- CDF W 

- 7/29/2002

## Forward-Backward Asymmetry

- Z/e+e- (central+forward)

- Toward sin2W measurement,
- searches beyond SM: extra dimensions, Z’, ...

- 7/29/2002

## Jets, Photons, Missing ET

- DØ Run 2 Preliminary

**Di-photon sample**
**Multijet sample **

- Jet Multiplicity in W + jets

- For ET > 400 GeV,
-  (s = 1.96 TeV) = 2 x  (s = 1.8 TeV)

- Toward Top, Higgs, New Phenomena

- Inclusive jet pT spectrum

- Missing ET (GeV)

- Jet ET (GeV)

- Njet cut

- 7/29/2002
# Presentation: 084123

## REVIEW OF OCS INCIDENTS

**CY 2006**

## MAIN INCIDENT TYPES

** ****Fatalities****	****	****	****  ****	****	****  10**
** ****Injuries > 1 DART****	****	****	****191**
** ****Fires ****	****	****	****	****	****	****130**
** ****Explosions****	****	****	****	****    ****	****    9**
** ****Collisions****	****	****	****	****	****  25**
** ****Loss of Well Control****	****	****    ****	****    1**
** ****Spills ****≥ 50 bbl****	****	****	****  ****	****  13**

## Primary Operations Associated with Fatalities

## DRILLING FATALITIES

**Pulling tubing – freeing stuck tubing; tubing & slips blown out of hole**
**Driving conductor pipe – weld on drive pipe assembly failed; drive sub fell**
**Driving conductor pipe – air hoist rigged to V-door post; post failed**

## DIVING FATALITIES

**Diver became ill after completion of dive**
**Diver conducting salvage operations**
**Diver ascending to the surface; Manta Ray caught dive hose and pulled him to surface**

## OTHER FATALITIES

**Worker slipped transferring from boat to platform using rope swing**
**Pipelay operations – worker crushed between pipe joints on conveyor system**
**Maintenance – worker boarded platform; fell from cellar deck**

## Number of Injuries ≥ 1 DART

## Injury Type for > 3 DART

## Body Part Injured                      > 3 DART

## Primary Operations Associated > 3 DART

## Secondary Operations Associated with > 3 DART

## Time of Day – Injuries> 3 DART

## Other Incident Types in New Rule

-  **Crane / Lifting****	****	****	****	****	**** 104**
** ****Muster for Evacuation****	****	****	****   17**
** ****Gas Release****	****	****	****	****	****     8**
** ****Property Damage > $ 25,000****	****	****     7**
** ****Structural Damage****	****	****	****	****     5**
** ****Damage/Disable Safety Equipment   4**

## Crane / Lifting Incidents

**~30% of Injuries      > 3 DART**
**Crane Operations **
**and **
**Safety Conference**
**Sponsored by API**
**July 17-18, 2007**
**Houston, Texas**

## The Cost of Injuries

**Human Cost**
**Injuries with Days Away from Work Resulted in **_**2.3 Years**_** of DART**
- 			 **400 Days  > 3 DART**
**	****	****	**** ****265 Days  Additional Days**
**	****	****      ****+**_**160 Days   1-3 DART  **_
**	****	****	**** ****825  Total Days DART**

## Common Objectives

**Zero Fatalities**
**Reduce Injuries**
**Safer Crane Operations**
**Improve Incident Information**
**** Diligent Reporting ****
**** Improved Analysis and Publication ****
**	****	**

_**http://www.mms.gov/incidents/**_
_**melinda.mayes@ mms.gov**_
# Presentation: 201445

## MNM Fatal 2005-19

- Powered Haulage
- July 30, 2005 (Nevada)
- Gold Operation
- Equipment Operator
- 23 years old
- 2 years mining experience

## Overview

- The victim was operating a water truck that left a haul road and drove onto the berm.  The truck climbed the berm, causing it to overturn and land back on the haul road.  The victim, who was not wearing a seat belt, was ejected from the cab of the truck.

## Slide 3

## Causal Factors

- The driver failed to maintain control of the water truck while it was in motion.  Although the levels of the methamphetamine could not be established as impairing the victim, it is a medical fact that fatigue occurs as the user withdraws from the substance.
- The driver of the water truck failed to fasten his seat beat while operating his truck.

## Best Practices

- Stop, Look, Analyze, and Manage (SLAM) each task.
- Always wear a seat belt when operating a truck or moving machine.
- Conduct pre-operational checks to identify any defects that may affect the safe operation of equipment before it is placed into service.
- Management should continue to focus attention toward substance abuse and educate miners regarding the symptoms and behavior exhibited by persons who may be abusing controlled substances.
# Presentation: 855222

## The Biggest Unknowns in Functional MRI

- Peter A. Bandettini, Ph.D
- Unit on Functional Imaging Methods
- &
- Functional MRI Facility
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition
- National Institute of Mental Health

## The Biggest Unknowns in Functional MRI

- Relationship between neuronal activity and BOLD contrast?
- Source of BOLD dynamic characteristics?
- Sources of variability?
- What’s really in the noise?
- What’s “resting” state?
- Other sources of functional contrast?
- Ultimate temporal resolution?
- Ultimate spatial resolution?
- Ultimate clinical utility?
- Best display methods?
- Best processing methods?
- Optimal Field Strength?

## Magnitude

- Location

- Why?

- Neg. BOLD

- Inhibition

## Source of BOLD Characteristics?

## Sources of variability?

## What’s really in the noise?

## What is “resting” state?

## Other sources of functional contrast?

## Ultimate temporal resolution?

## Resolving columns with single shot EPI is a goal..

- ...using SENSE, 32 channels, 7T,
- and perhaps partial k-space we might get to 0.5 mm3

## Needs: 

- Needs:
- 	Real time feedback
- 	Characterization of confounding effects
- 	Robust yet incisive set of probe tasks
- 	Baseline information?

## Classification methods?

- Multivariate methods?
- Connectivity (across time and space scales?)

- Signal and noise models...
- Model free, open ended, methods?

- fMRI data, and noise is time and space varying in predictable and unpredictable ways over several temporal and spatial scales...

## Surface

- Glass brain
- ROI
- Time courses
- Example slices
- Connectivity maps?
- “Quality” index?

- To convey:
- -collapsed multidimensional data
- -sense of data quality

## Utility vs. Difficulty

- Both depend on the specific needs

- ...needs tend to increase with better technology

## Functional MRI Facility	

**Sean Marrett**
**Jerzy Bodurka**
**Frank Ye**
**Wen-Ming Luh**
**Rasmus Birn**

**Functional Imaging Methods Unit**
**&**
**Functional MRI Facility**

**Program Assistant:**
**Kay Kuhns**

**Computer Specialist:**
**Adam Thomas**

**Post Docs:**
**Hauke Heekeren**
**David Knight**
**Anthony Boemio**
**Niko Kriegeskorte**

**Graduate Student:**
**Natalia Petridou**

**Scanning Technologists:**
**Karen Bove-Bettis**
**Paula Rowser**
**Alda Ottley**
**Ellen Condon**
# Presentation: 722694

## Aura DSWG MeetingESDIS Status10/27/08

- Alfreda Hall
- SGT, Inc
- System Engineer
- NASA GSFC Code 423
- _[Alfreda.A.Hall@nasa.gov](mailto:Alfreda.A.Hall@nasa.gov)_
- 301-614-5147

## EOSDIS Evolution Status

- ANGe will replace LATIS at Langley. CALIPSO and CERES have already been transitioned to ANGe.
- Due to schedule and budget concerns, a decision was made by ESDIS Management to continue supporting TES, MISR, and MOPITT through the ECS.
- ECS release 7.22 is scheduled to be delivered to ASDC in February 2009.

## Evolution Testing

- Completed successfully the GES DISC Near Real Time (NRT) Mini-MOSS test, February 19-21, 2008:
- MLS SIPS received L0 rate buffered data (RBDs) and Aura GBAD RBDs.
- HIRDLS SIPS received Aura GBAD RBDs

- Status of Evolution ICDs

- Status of Evolution ICDs (con’t)

## WIST Status

- Warehouse Inventory Search Tool (WIST): ECHO client based on the EDG user interface
- The operational WIST 10.0  includes all of the EDG functionality
- Added support for bounding box queries
- Reduced query time for Additional Attributes searches
- ECHO Partners (e.g. NASA DAACs) will continue to test and evaluate WIST as new releases are made.
- EDG to WIST Transition
- Began EDG-to-WIST transition in July 2008 with the delivery of the Self Migration Tool (SMT) to enable current EDG users to easily replicate their accounts into ECHO/WIST
- ASF, ORNL,  NSIDC and LP DAAC valids have been removed from EDG
- Their  holdings have been reconciled in ECHO
- They are receiving and successfully processing orders from WIST 10 / ECHO 10
- LaRC and GHRC are scheduled to remove their valids in the first quarter of 2009
# Presentation: 525366

## EXAMPLEPackaging Simulations forTransfer to Remote Locations(Simulation Packager/Unpackager)

- FRAMES-2.0 Workshop
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Bethesda, Maryland
- November 15-16, 2007
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Richland, Washington

## Introduction

- The Packager utilities are simple tools designed to collect files associated with a FRAMES module, simulation, or system to conveniently transport them to remote locations.
- There are three sets of Packagers/Unpackagers:
- Module – All the datasets and dictionaries around a selected module
**Simulation **– All datasets and dictionaries** **
- System – All dictionaries, units, modules, and settings.  No Executables/Libraries/Batch Files

## Simulation Packager

- Choose Simulation Packager under the Tools Menu
- Identify a file name with a zip extension (GWCalvert.zip).
- Store in an appropriate folder, usually where the sim file is located.

**1**

**2**

**3**

**Simulation Packager**

## Simulation Unpackager

- Choose Simulation Unpackager under the Tools Menu
- Identify the folder location where the zip file was stored on the new computer.
- Double click the zip file to be unpackaged (GWCalvert.zip).

**Simulation Unpackager**

**1**

**3**

**2**

## Summary

- Packaged Simulations need to be unpackaged in a folder or subfolder where FRAMES 2 resides.  It is best to extract the packaged simulation to a folder in
- 	C:\Program Files\FramesV2
- Presently a packaged file will not indicate which packager was used to create it.  The corresponding Unpackager ***MUST*** be used to retrieve the files.  Make sure that the .zip you are trying to unpackage is from the Simulation Packager, and not from any other FRAMES packager (i.e. Module or System Packager).
# Presentation: 141723

## PALAU MAREPAC

**Presented By:  Alma Ridep-Morris**
**(MAREPAC Chairperson)**
**10****th**** US Coral Reef Task Force Meeting **
**(CNMI & Guam)**

**PALAU MAREPAC**

## MAREPAC mission:

**MAREPAC mission:**
** ****Conservation of coastal and marine environments**
** ****Sustainable use of marine resources**

## PALAU-MAREPAC members:

**PALAU-MAREPAC members:**
- Bureau of Marine Resources
- Coral Reef Research Foundation
- Community Centered Conservation
- Department of Conservation & Law Enforcement
- Division of Fish and Wildlife Protection
- Office of Environmental Response and Coordination
- Palau Automated Land and Resource Information System
- Palau Community College – Cooperative Research Extension
- Palau Conservation Society
- Palau International Coral Reef Center
- The Environment Inc.
- The Nature Conservancy

## MAREPAC Goals

- Promote wise, appropriate, and sustainable use of coastal and marine resources
- Sustainable management
- Capacity Building
- Conservation
- Policy Development
- Public Awareness
- Community participation

##   Status of our commercial and non-commercial marine resources

-   Status of our commercial and non-commercial marine resources
-   Up-to-date information for policy makers and managers
-   Enhance communication & coordination between marine resources stakeholders

## Research and Monitoring

## Jellyfish Lake

## Mastigias jellyfish

***Mastigias***** jellyfish**

## Thermograph

**Thermograph**

## Ngaremeduu Conservation Area

**Ngaremeduu Conservation Area**

## Coral Reef Monitoring

## Slide 12

## Public Awareness

## Compact Road Project

**Compact Road Project**

## MAREPAC DATABASE

## Slide 16

## Marine Protected Areas

**Marine Protected Areas**

## GIS Coral Reef Layer & Database Development

## Slide 19
# Presentation: 735702

## EPICS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT

- EPICS Seminar
- Presented by SHIFU XU ,IHEP
- 20 August 2002

## Outline

- PCI & ISA device driver on Linux Platform
- Remote device driver via Ethernet
- VME I/O device driver on vxWorks
- Application to develop

## PCI & ISA device driver 

- OS:Linux Redhat 7.1
- EPICS base release:3.14 alpha02/01
- ISA board:PC6310 A/D,12bits,32 channels
-  PCI board:PCI8020
- 12bits A/D,8 channels (bipolar)
- 8bits D/A, 2 channels
- 0~5v unipolar or -5v~+5v bipolar (AI)
- Conversion time < 10us

## PCI device driver--hardware

## PCI device driver--test

## Ethernet-based Device driver

- Asynchronous Device driver
- IOC 3.13
- OPI MEDM
- vxworks5.31, tornado1.01
- compiler:ccppc
- gmake

## Ethernet-based Device driver

## Ethernet-based Device driver

## VME I/O device driver

- Sun solaris 2.8 + Torado 2.02
- vxWorks 5.4
- MVME2431 cpu board
- MVME512—004 I/O module
- 12bits D/A, 2 channels
- 16bits A/D, 16 channels (bipolar input)

## VME I/O device driver

## VME I/O device driver

## VME I/O device driver

## Files involved

- devM512.c, drvM512.c
- mydbExample1.db, mydbExample2.db
- exampleApp.dbd
- st.cmd
- Makefile

## exampleApp.dbd

- include "base.dbd"
- device(ai,VME_IO,devAiM512,"MVME512board")
- device(ao,VME_IO,devAoM512,"MVME512board")
- driver(drvM512)

## mydbExample1.db

- record(ao, "$(user):myaoExample")
- {
-        field(DTYP, "MVME512board")
-         field(OUT, "#C0 S1 @")
-         field(SCAN, "Passive")
-         field(LINR, "LINEAR")
-         field(ESLO, "0.00488281") #20.0/0xFFF
-         field(EGUF, "10.0")
-         field(EGUL, "-10.0")
-         field(OMSL, "closed_loop")
-         field(DOL, "$(user):calcExample.VAL NPP NMS")
-         field(HOPR, "10")
-         field(LOPR, "-10")
- }

## mydbExample1.db(cont.)

- record(ai, "$(user):myaiExample")
- {
- 	field(DTYP, "MVME512board")
- 	field(INP, "#C0 S0 @")
- 	field(SCAN,"Passive")
- 	field(LINR, "LINEAR")
- 	field(ESLO, "0.00030518")  #20.0/0xFFFF
- 	field(EGUF, "10")
- 	field(EGUL, "-10")
- 	field(HOPR, "10")
- 	field(LOPR, "-10")
- }

## st.cmd

- cd  "/export/home/xusf/epicsapp/512/bin/ppc604"
- ld < iocCore
- ld < seq
- ld < exampleLib
- cd "/export/home/xusf/epicsapp/512/iocBoot/iocm512"
- dbLoadDatabase("../../dbd/exampleApp.dbd")
- dbLoadRecords("../../db/mydbExample1.db","user=xusf")
- dbLoadRecords("../../db/mydbExample2.db","user=xusf")
- drvM512Verbose=(short)1
- devM512Verbose=(short)1
- iocInit

## Our plan 

- CAN bus device driver based on VME
- Controlnet device driver based on VME
-    or via ethernet

## Thanks
# Presentation: 811395

## Property Reconciliation Activities and Initiatives

- Presented by**Joe Giorlando**

## Property Financial Indicators

**Property Financial Indicators**

**“**Current State of Property”** **

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Reconciliation Status

**Reconciling Item Counts as of January 2005:**

**Accumulated Depr/Amort ****(1759/1839)**

** ****Cost Items (1750/1830)**

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Status of Inventories

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Aging of Suspense

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Property Initiatives

**Property Initiatives**

- “We’re Earning Our Keep”

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Continuous Monitoring of Property Activity

- Monthly Preparation of Inventory Status
- Weekly Review/Monthly Reporting of Suspense Activity
- Identification and Resolution of Reconciling Items
- February 2005 – Submitted 83 Line Adjustments
- March 2005 – Submitted 327 Line Adjustments

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Data Clean-up Efforts

- Annual Accounting Code Roll
- “Sync” Accounting Codes Between PROP and FFIS
- Review Existing Records in Anticipation of CPAIS
- Spearheaded by OPPM
- Correcting Data or Supplying Missing Data within PROP Records, e.g., BOC’s, SIN for Vehicles, Location Data, etc.

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Formulation of Accounting Standards for Property

- Drafting Departmental Policy – to be published by September 30, 2005
- Provide Specific Guidance on Accounting Issues
- Ownership
- Capitalization Criteria, Enhancements and Components
- Gains and Losses
- Reference with Clear Examples for Unique Situations

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## Procedural Changes for Certain Property Transactions

- Cost Allocation Model Changes
- Unique “Allocation Account”
- Modification of Posting Models
- Property Purchased Under Reimbursable Agreements
- Federal, Non-USDA Partner
- Non-Federal Partner
- USDA Partner

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer

## CPAIS Development

- Integral Part of the Development Team:
- Requirements
- Conversion
- Testing
- Training
- Implementation
- Reconciliation

- Office of the Chief Financial Officer
# Presentation: 157146

## Low - Rate Information Transmission  (LRIT)Prototype ReceiverDesign

- Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas
- Frank Eng, Computer Sciences Corp.
- December 10, 2002

## LRIT Receiver Development Background

**Initial NOAA LRIT development study in early 2001**
**Initial LRIT receiver specification development**
**LRIT prototype receiver development begun in mid 2001**
**LRIT prototype receiver development completed in November 2002**
**LRIT prototype receiver design and software will be made available**

## LRIT Receiver Design Considerations

**Performance: Reliable RF reception for 10****-8**** BER**
**WEFAX RF compatibility**
**CGMS compatibility (CCSDS)**
**Basic receive processing**
**Basic data management**
**Basic viewing**
**Value added S/W capability**
**Cost**

## Basic Receiver Components

**1 meter dish**
**Low noise amplifier**
**Down converter**
**Demodulator**

**PC**
**Software**
**CCSDS LRIT processing**
**File handling**
**Viewing**

## Software, CCSDS LRIT Processing

- CCSDS PN-deradomization
- Reed-Solomon FEC decoding
- Level zero processing
- Generate traffic statistics
- Decompress compressed files

## Software, File Handling 

- Receive LRIT files
- Store LRIT files
- Combine image segments
- Retrieve data
- Error logging

## Software, Viewing 

- Display images and image segments
- Overlay latitude and longitude
- Zoom
- Pan
- Thumbnail area display

## LRIT Receiver Specifications

- 1691 MHz L-band receiver
- 1 meter antenna, G/T –0.3 dB
- Modulation PCM/NRZ-L/BPSK
- Data rate 128 kbps; 293 k-symbols/s
- CGMS (CCSDS) LRIT data format
- JPEG and Rice compression

## Receiver  Specifications

- Detailed LRIT receiver specifications are available at NOAA’s WEFAX web site
- 		“http://noaasis.noaa.gov/WEFAX/”
- 		    ***see the LRIT Report - Part 3***
- “Final” detailed LRIT receiver specifications  	will be available after system integration 		test in January 2003

- 	The prototype receiver
- (user terminal) is being demonstrated by
**Avtec Systems, Inc.**
- in the Exhibit Area
# Presentation: 796701

## Working with NIST 

**Paul Zielinski**

- Chief, Office of Technology Partnerships

## Collaborative Research & Technology Development Programs

- Informal Collaboration
- Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
- Guest Research Agreements
- Facility Use Agreements
- Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA)
- Licensing Agreements

## Informal Collaboration and Memorandum of Understanding

- Informal Collaboration
- Most common form of interaction with university & industry partners
- No preferential intellectual property rights – common law
- Proprietary information covered by Trade Secrets Act
- Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
- Typically used to broadly define a collaborative relationship between institutions.
- Frequently implemented via subsidiary agreements

## Guest Research Agreement

- Most common ‘formal’ partnering agreement (about 1500 per year)
- Purpose - make NIST facilities available for a limited time to researchers collaborating on R&D projects of mutual interest
- Partners
- Universities
- Industry
- Other government agencies
- Local/state government
- International institutions

## Facility Use Agreement

- Industry use of _designated_ NIST measurement equipment and facilities
- Not competitive with private sector
- Equal access
- Availability
- Cost recovery
- Safety
- Proprietary
- Non-Proprietary

**Notes:**
Neutron Beamline – peer review panel, non proprietary mainly
Nano Facility now a designated facility

## Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)

- Defines partners rights
- Intellectual property rights.
- Potential to protect results from the Freedom of Information Act.
- Possible exclusive license without a public process.
- Either party may contribute equipment, facilities, personnel, intellectual property - NIST cannot provide funds to the collaborator but partners may provide funds to NIST.
- Consortia
- Governed by _identical_ agreements with several industry partners
- Examples: Gene Expression Metrology; External RNA Control; Fire Resistive Materials for Structural Steel
- Material Transfer Agreement

**Notes:**
MTA - Define the Material being transferred 

Define Accepted uses of the Material (typically research and/or characterization)

Define the Intellectual Property Rights retained by each Party

## Licensing Agreement

- NIST patents are available for licensing
- US manufacturing
- Exclusive and non-exclusive opportunities
- Potential for CRADA
- NIST pursues patent protection for a technology when:
- The patent may enhance its commercialization or use by industry.
- Seeking patent protection is required under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA).
- Patent protection is needed for other mission related reasons.

## Contact Information

- _[www.nist.gov](http://www.nist.gov/)_ look for “Work with us”
- _[http://patapsco.nist.gov/ts/220/external/index.htm](http://patapsco.nist.gov/ts/220/external/index.htm)_
- J. Terry Lynch, CRADA and License Officer 	     301-975-2691 or email _[jtlynch@nist.gov](mailto:jtlynch@nist.gov)_
- Paul Zielinski, Chief, Office of Technology Partnerships 301-975-4980 or _paul.zielinski@nist.gov_
# Presentation: 498957

## NIEHS SBRP Web Seminar

**NIEHS SBRP Web Seminar**
- By Dr. Keith Pezzoli and Hiram Sarabia

***UCSD’s SBRP is funded by NIEHS grant P42 ES010337. ***

- US-Mexico Border Region

- Strategy

- Source(s): U.S.EPA, UCSD SBRP and Paula Stigler

- Basic Research

- Research Translation

- Source(s): NIEHS and UCSD SBRP

- Research Translation in Region

-      National and Trans-border Efforts

- Source(s): NIEHS, UCSD SBRP,
- City of San Diego, County of San Diego

- Bioremediation

- Sustainability

- Inouye, L. S., and McFarland,V.A. (2000). “Biomarker-based analysis for contaminants
- in sediments/soil: Review of cell-based assays and cDNA arrays,” *DOER Technical*
*Notes Collection *(ERDC TN-DOER-C19), U.S. Army Engineer Research and
- Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. _[www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer](http://www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer)_
*http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/dots/doer/pdf/doerc19.pdf*

- Source(s): UCSD SBRP and Paula Stigler
# Presentation: 125893

## Process Management

- Meeting at Argonne
- June 5-6, 2003

## Schematic of Process Management Component in Context

- QM

- PM

- MPD’s

- mpdrun

- XML
- file

- mpiexec

- (MPI Standard args)

- Brett’s job
- submission language

- interactive

- simple scripts
- using SSS XML

- SSS Components

- application
- processes

- SSS
- XML

- “Official” SSS side

- Prototype MPD-based
-  implementation side

- EM

- SD

- PM

- Sched

- NSM

## MPD Progress

- MPD-2
- In Python
- Distributed as part of MPICH-2 (implements PMI)
- Supports requirements of SSS
- Separate executables for each process
- Separate arguments for each process
- Separate environment variables for each process
- Supports MPI Standard mpiexec as job start command
- Includes all of the SSS requirements

## Since Last Meeting

- PM now implements “restriction syntax” XML for querying status of running jobs
- MPD supplies necessary data from its internal data structures
- Exports to PM
- PM tested with new QM implementation
- PM XML interface now ready for presentation
# Presentation: 694600

**Physics collaboration and communication through emerging media**

**Charles W. Clark and James E. Williams**

***National Institute of Standards and Technology***

**Two topics:**

**Podcasting of seminars and lectures**

**Collaborative group research blog**

**Podcast**

**Simply a set of audio or video files that can be downloaded by subscription onto a desktop or portable device, for playback later.**** ****	****- Audio**** ****	****- “Enhanced” (audio + still image overlays)**** ****	****- Video**

**Podcast mechanics**

**Listener**

**Podcast directory service**

**Podcaster**

***light load (kb)***

***heavy load (100 Mb)***

**Key findings of our experience**

**“****Enhanced” podcasts preferable to full video****  **
** ****	****- Less labor-intensive to produce quality product**
**	****- Greater visibility and accessibility of slides**
**	****- Smaller file size (30 Mb/hour vs. 200 Mb/hour)**

**Production manual**

**Based on Apple Computer’s GarageBand application**
**Automated application recently available, to convert .ppt files to podcasts: http:/profcast.com**

***Names of commercial products are provided here for purposes of identification only. Thess products are not tested or endorsed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.***

**Group research blog**

**Target: broadcast communication medium accessible to trusted research group, to disseminate ideas, algorithms, images, complex text.**
**Solution: password-protected group research blog**

**Group research blog**

**Desired: broadcast communication medium accessible to trusted (password-protected) research group, to disseminate ideas, algorithms, images, complex text.**

**Group research blog**

**Desired: broadcast communication medium accessible to trusted (password-protected) research group, to disseminate ideas, algorithms, images, complex text.**

**Group research blog**

**Desired: broadcast communication medium accessible to trusted (password-protected) research group, to disseminate ideas, algorithms, images, complex text.**

## Slide 16

**Blog provides for**

** ****- TeX transcribed inline as bitmap images**
** ****- Standard image formats interpreted inline**
** ****- HTML authoring capability**
** ****- Repository of any downloadable file**
** ****- Posting to blog via e-mail**
** ****- Sync with PDA  **

**Sync with PDA**

**Advantages to global research enterprises**

** ****- Worldwide communication of technical information in standard format**
**  ****Controlled access**
**  ****Near-time conference reports from members of group**
**  ****Rapid response across time zones**

**Paths forward**

** ****- SMS/IM messaging to blog**
** ****- Sync with phone**
** ****- Chat and conference functions**

**How to:**

**See http://physics.nist.gov/PCC **
# Presentation: 486875

## LOSWG Summary Report

**Meeting 10 October 2006, ~35 participants**
**Objectives:**
**Address Range Test Bed project – decide on Plan Forward**
**Discuss LOSWG Charter, CY07-CY08 Objectives and Plans **

## LOSWG - 10 October 2007

**Range Test Bed**
**Purpose / Issues**
**Literal / Virtual?**
**Single / Multiple Sites?**
**New [Space-Based] System v. Technology Infusion?**
**Certification (Commercial Range(s))?**
**Champions [Including Funding Sources]**
**DARPA?**
**Space Command?**
**FAA R&D Call?**
**Users [Spaceports, Vehicle System Operators]?**
**Requires Further Definition**

## LOSWG - 10 October 2007

**Range Test Bed**
**Requires Further Definition and “CinC Range”**
**Actions**
**Bring Future to the Present – Treat Like ‘Next Generation Air Transportation System’**
**Gather / Consolidate “Range” Users Specific Needs**
**Develop Champion(s) Who Have Interest and Capacity to Fund Next Generation “Space Traffic Management System” **

## LOSWG - 10 October 2007

**LOSWG Charter**
**Discussed LOSWG Purpose**
**Recommend Changing Title/Charter to Space Transportation Operations Working Group**
**Address Full Gamut of Commercial Space Flight Systems Operations**
**Launch Is Just One Aspect**
**Inclusive of Expendable and Reflyable Systems**
**Requires Further Discussion with COMSTAC Chairman Trafton, Ms. Parker, Ms. Smith**
# Presentation: 285873

## QuarkNet Cosmic RaysAugust 14, 2003

- Niles West High School
- Skokie, IL
- Richard DeCoster

- Enrollment about 2400
**Physics Courses:**
- AP Physics		1 section
- Advanced Physics Topics	1 section
- Honors Physics 		4 section
- Physics, Regular		9 section
- Physics, Conceptual	5 sections

## Cosmic Ray ClassesBrief History

- TEACHERS
- 1999:  Summer-8 Weeks at FNAL/D0
- 2000:  Associate Teachers Institute NWHS,
- 	with follow-up 2000-2001 school year
- 2001:  Summer Institute at Fermilab

- CLASSROOM IMPLEMENTATION
- 2001:  Regular Physics [3 sections] APT [1 sect.]
- 2002:  Regular Physics [1 sect.]  Honors [3 sect.]

## The Teachers

## Teachers at Work

## Scintillator Paddle

- Physical object which collects data.
- After a muon interaction, the right side produces photons.
- These photons are collected on the left side by a photomultiplier (PM) tube and converted to an electric signal.
- Signal is sent to electronics array.

**Equipment List**
** **
** ****Plexiglass Scintillator Paddles (2);*** *
** ****Photomultiplier Tube (2);*** *
** ****Oscilloscope ;**  The Oscilloscope should have two channels
-    and external triggering capabilities.
** ****High Voltage Power Supply(2);** The power supply must
-    reach levels near 2000 V to power the photomultiplier tubes.

## The Electronics Array

- Signal Delay Unit

- Singles
- Event
- Counter

- Discriminator

- Logic Gate

- Coincidence Event Counter

## Equipment List Cont.

** ****NIM-Bin Electronics Rack;  Holds counting/measuring equipment.**
** ****2 Channel Signal Strength Discriminator **
** ****2 Channel Digital Event Counter**
** ****AND Logic Gate*****  ***
** ****Coincident Event Counter **
** ****Cabling:*****   ***
***   ***2  High-voltage coaxial cables w/ 50 Ohm Limo Connections
-  12 4ns length coaxial cables w/ 50 Ohm Limo Connections.

## Sample Instruction Sheet

## Data Tables

## Plot of Observations

## Data: Coincidences

## Plot of Observations 2

## Summary

**  ****INVOLVEMENT OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS AND STUDENTS**
-   **EQUIPMENT:  SCINTILLATOR,  PM TUBE, COUNTING APPARATUS**
**  ****SAMPLE DATA ANALYSIS**
** ****OTHER EXPERIMENTS:  STATISTICS, CHANGING OVERLAP AREA, CHANGING DETECTOR ORIENTATION, ABSORPTION, CLOUD CHAMBER**
# Presentation: 388519

## Frame and Assembly Planning Status

- E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen
- LBNL
- W. Miller
- Hytec, Inc

## Next Steps on Frame

- Disk frame prototype will be completed shortly and properties measured.
- Want to move towards final design => identify _additional_ open issues that affect frame design and fabrication
- These include
- additional prototype steps(our current priority)
- Prototype disk mounts(1)
- Prototype end support stiffener and related area(2)
- Prototype barrel support cone(3)
- services routing(see Eric’s talk also)
- SCT mounting interface
- strain relief of services
- final assembly

## Overview

- Animation with description may be found at
- http://pxs.lbl.gov/~goozen/assdetset.html

## Implications for Frame Design

- Mostly strain relief
- Need support pieces for strain relief of disk services connected to frame inside frame => clips attached to frame or holes in frame panels to grab custom plastic or composite pieces holding pigtails, cables, pipes
- Disk pigtails currently planned to hold active optical components => need stiffening and protection that are coupled securely to strain relief.
- Detail 3D CAD model of this region underway
- Covers/strain relief of barrel services on disk frame section - what do these look like?
- Strain relief at ends of center frame section for services - not clear what this looks like - additional hard points in panel ends?
- Strain relief at ends of disk section - integrated into end stiffening plate - design started(see Eric).
- For final assembly....additional hard points at ends, integrated into end stiffening plate or something else to allow spiders to grab from ends.
# Presentation: 841663

## Hot White Dwarf Stars in Stripe 82

- Scot Kleinman
- Gemini Observatory
- skleinman@gemini.edu
- DES Calibration Mtng. 13Jun08

## Sloan Digital Sky Survey

- Goals:
- 	1. Image 1⁄4 of sky in 5 bands to r=23 mag
- 	2. Obtain redshifts of 1 million galaxies to r=18
- 	3. Obtain redshift of 100,000 quasars to r=19
-       4. Approximately 100,000,000 photometric objects!
- Technique:
- 	1. Construct a 2.5 m telescope, CCD array
- 		imager, 640 fiber spectrograph at Apache
- 		Point, New Mexico
- 	2. Operate for 5 years
-       3.  Find a way to pay the bills! (~$83 million through 2005)‏

## The Mosaic Camera

##  Fiber Cartridges (9 total)‏

-  Fiber Cartridges (9 total)‏

## So you don't care about redshifts?

- McCook & Sion (1999) list 2249 WDs
- DR1 (~20% of SDSS) found 2561 + 138(?)!
- How?
- Serendipity: 1310
- QSO: 709
- Hot Standards: 531
- White Dwarf: 157
- New Variables, DQVs(?), DBH, Low mass, High mass, DO subtypes, ....

## A brief history of SDSS WDs

- Pre-SDSS: Fan 1999 – Photometric simulations of WD and other objects in SDSS colors
- EDR: Harris et al. 2003 – 269 WDs (190 deg^2)‏
- DR1: Kleinman et al. 2004 – 2551 WDs (2100 deg^2)‏
- DR4: Eisenstein et al. 2006 – 9316 WDs (4783 deg^2)‏
- DR6: Kleinman et al., *in progress* – 3863 new WDs from DR4 and counting
- EDR-DR6 – all spectroscopically confirmed WDs
- ~80% of these WDs are DAs

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## Hot DAs in Particular

- I took the DR1, DR4, and current DR6 catalogs, looked for objects only in stripe 82 (plate center eta within 1.25 degrees of 82.5), and removed duplicates with same PMFs:
- 732 DAs with Teff_fit >= 10000K
- 173 of which have Teff_fit >= 20000K
- DAs pulsate in an SDSS fit temperature range ~10800 -- 12500K (478 of the 732 >= 12500K)‏
- DR6 catalog will refit all previous SDSS WDs with improved models and more WDs are still to be found...

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## Where are they?

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## Where are they?

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## DR1 WDs...

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## DR1 WDs...

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## Where is everyone else?

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## From Fan (1999)‏

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

## What do they look like?

- T=13500K

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

- g=20.4

## What do they look like?

- T=21000

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

- g=19.6

## What do they look like?

- T=55000K

- Kleinman, Gemini Observatory

- g=19.6
# Presentation: 713398

## DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYOFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE

- Homeland Security Initiatives
- Thom Taylor

## Since 9-11

-   Information Management
-  Training
-  Technology
-  Liaison

## INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

-  All-Source Intelligence Analysis
-  Critical Infrastructure
-   Threat Warning

## TRAINING

-  Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
-  Nuclear Energy Proliferation Intelligence
-   (NEPI)
-   Special

## TECHNOLOGY

-  Sensors
-  Expertise
-   Associate Training
-   Nuclear Emergency Search Teams
-    (NEST)

## LIAISON

-  DOE Internal
-   NNSA Coordination Council
-   Counter-Intelligence
-   Emergency Operations Center
-   NEST
-   Executive Protection

## LIAISON (Cont.)

-  DOE External
-   Military – DOD, Joint Commands and
-     Services
-   FBI and Law Enforcement
-   Intelligence Community
-   INS, Customs, and others

## NEW INTERESTS

-  Chemical and Biological
-   Threat to DOE Operations
-    Detectors

-  Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD)
-   Threat Analysis
-    Response Training

## POINT OF CONTACT

-  Thom Taylor
-   202-586-0260 (STU III)
-   361-6119 (N.S.T.S.)
-   202-586-0751 (UNCL FAX)
-   202-586-7570 (CLASSIFIED FAX)
# Presentation: 573945

## Aviation Design Software

-   General Aviation CAD (G.A.-CAD) software package simplifies process of 		designing general aviation aircraft.
-   All applicable performance and flying quality regulations are embedded in the 		program giving the designer an immediate assessment as to whether or not the 	design meets air worthiness regulations.
-   Program performs the calculations for the designer, reducing design and 		development time by half.
-  	Program rapidly determines how change in one part of the design affects all other 	parts, taking into consideration all aspects of the configuration from weight sizing 	and wing loading to stability and control surface requirements, among a host of 	other parameters.
**                              ****COMMERCIALIZATION**
- 	The software package is sold under the name General Aviation CAD (G.A.-CAD)
-  	Target markets: Small manufacturers with little experience in obtaining General  	Aviation certification, home builders of airplanes, students and others interested in 	the design and analysis of aircraft
-  	G.A.-CAD created a new profit center/business segment within DAR Corporation
-  	Three full-time jobs are associated with G.A.-CAD.
-  	$400,000 cumulative sales revenues to date
-  	$500,000 cumulative private capital investment to date.
-  	A spin-off product, Aero-CADD, is another computer aided design program with 	special tools built in for airplane design.

**Aviation Design Software**

***DARcorporation***
***Lawrence, Kansas***

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**

**      ****GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
** ****	**General Aviation Revitalization
-  	Enables small airplane manufacturers and individuals to design 		new airplanes by using advanced design tools fulfilling

- 1993 SBIR Phase II; NAS # 1-20415
- NASA Langley Research Center - Dr. James Townsend 757-864-2299 William A. Anemaat, Vice President - 785-832-0434
- E-mail: info@darcorp.com
- On the Web: www.darcorp.com

- Langley Research Center

- Current Photo of Product

- Title of photo

- SS No. 1-019
# Presentation: 440106

## Truck Wreckage Visibility

- David S. Rayburn

## Truck Wreckage Visibility

- Tractor semitrailer rollover
- Underside facing oncoming motorcoach
- Dark conditions
- 1:59 a.m.
- Rural area
- No highway lighting
- Postaccident visibility study
- Placed tractor semitrailer on I-94
- Exemplar bus
- Similar lighting conditions

## Postaccident Visibility Study

- Slow approach
- Frequent stops
- Expectation of looking for truck wreckage

## Postaccident Visibility Study, Cont’d.

## Postaccident Visibility Study, Cont’d.

- Low-beam detection of hazard in lane
- Emergency braking

**227 feet**

## Slide 6
# Presentation: 180481

## The Mid-Crustal Conductorand MT Data

- Toshiko Furukawa
- SAGE 2005
- University of Utah
- July 14th, 2005

- Rho (ohm-m)

- 1

- 10

- 100

- Depth (m)

- 100

- 1000

- 10000

- Conductor

- Basement

## Slide 2

## TE

- TM

- Sounding Curve (MT-01)

**Notes:**
Mention what we did – rotate, static shift
How deep

## Slide 4

**Notes:**
How deep the conductor is
Can’t tell the lower boundary of the conductor
How resistive, location of basement rock

## Possible Sources For the Conductor

- Magma
- Minerals
- Conductive Minerals such as graphite and pyrite
- Hydrous Minerals such as serpentines
- Aqueous Pore Fluids
- Connected pore fluids

## Magma

- Percent melt, Composition, Geometry...etc

-  Magmatic activity destroys the water trap  resistive
-  Resistive if not connected
-  No partial melt at 15km depth around Santa Fe River Site
-  Magma body ~20km

- In Rio Grande Rift

## Conductive Minerals

- Graphite is really conductive (10-5 ohm-m)
- Sources of Carbon
- CO2-rich fluids
- Organic rich sedimentary rocks (for example: Methane CH4)
- Metamorphism reduces to graphite
- Have to be connected film to be conductive

## Hydrous Minerals

- Free water from the dehydration of minerals containing structurally bound water
- Conductive Layer

- Examples
- Serpentine (Mg,Fe)3Si2O5(OH)4
- Hornblende Ca2(Mg,Fe,Al)5(Al,Si)8O22(OH)2

## Aqueous Pore Fluids

- Sources:
- Deep circulating meteoric water
- Metamorphic reactions
- Examples: prograding metamorphism of clay minerals
- Exsolution from magma
- CO2 and H2O

## How Fluids Get Trapped

- Dihedral Angles

- (Jiracek, et al. 1996)

## Another Mechanism of the Mid-crustal Fluid Trap

- In compressive tectonic settings

- Principal Stress

- Hydraulic Potential

- (Connolly and Podladchikov, 2004)

## Conclusion

- Mid-crust conductor is found at ~15km depth
- Possible sources for the mid-crust conductor
- Magma
- Conductive/Hydrous Minerals
- Aqueous pore fluids
- Interconnected pore spaces and impermeable cap
- Sources of aqueous fluids

## Acknowledgement

- Students and faculty members of SAGE 2005
- Quantec
- Cochiti People
- Special thanks to George, Louise, Shawn and Ericka
- Team 6
# Presentation: 827271

## TAMDAR-at the AAWU

**Wednesday March 5th 2008 TAMDAR Case**
**Forecaster: Dave Hadley**

## On Wednesday March 5th around 1700 UTC flight #421397 TAMDAR sounding had a very positive impact on the Alaska Aviation Weather Unit's area forecast.  
The 1200 UTC sounding at Anchorage International Airport showed through the lowest 3,000 feet steady southeast winds.  These winds were producing a very typical downslope event for the leeside of the Chugach mountain range. 
Light mixed precip began during the morning hours.

- The 1200 UTC sounding at Anchorage International Airport showed through the lowest 3,000 feet steady southeast winds.  These winds were producing a very typical downslope event for the leeside of the Chugach mountain range.
- Light mixed precip began during the morning hours.

## Slide 3

## However, by 1700 UTC the winds had shifted through the lowest 3,200 feet to a northeast direction.  This switch resulted in cooling of the lowest layers.  The down-sloping was negated across the lee of the Chugach range causing an unexpected snow event to occur.  

## Slide 5

## The affect of the TAMDAR sounding allowed the forecaster to diagnose the rapidly changing situation by determining that the cold wedge of air had stopped the turbulent mixing process below 3,000 feet.  This brought an abrupt end to the Low Level Wind Shear (LLWS) in the lee of the Chugach.  The forecaster then was able to adjust the SIGMET Juliet 2 forecast of severe turbulence from below 10,000 feet to a layer between 3,000 to 10,000 feet.

## Summary

- The TAMDAR data allowed a SIGMET to be adjusted to better represent the meteorological situation that was occurring.  This adjustment had a _**much lower probability**_ of being detected if the forecaster only had the 1200 UTC sounding and model data, and then had to wait to the 0000 UTC sounding to discover the change in the atmosphere.
- The TAMDAR data also helped to explain the dominant precipitation type that was occurring (more snow occurring than expected).
- The data also gave the forecaster enough confidence to drop the LLWS from the area forecast and influenced the forecast that was issued in the very next forecast package.
# Presentation: 686789

## ELECTRONIC
PUBLICATION
WATCH

(ePUBWATCH)

**PUBLICATION**
**WATCH**
**(ePUBWATCH)**

**February 5, 2003****	**** **

**MTAC Meeting**

## ePUBWATCH

**What is an ePublication Watch?**
**   ****An ePublication Watch ****(ePUBWATCH)**** is an electronic means to communicate with the U.S. Postal Service regarding delivery issues connected to periodicals.**

## ePUBWATCH 

**PARTICIPATION**
**85 Districts **
**7,600 Delivery Unit Computer (DUC) Sites**

## ePUBWATCH

**STATISTICS**
**	****	****	****	****	****    **_**Jan 2003**_**    **_**Nov 2002**_**     **_**Increase**_
**No. of Registered Publishers        238****	****  187****	****        27.3%**
**	**
**No. of Publishers Entering      ****	**
**	****ePUBWATCHs or Complaints       134               69****	****        94.2%**
**No. of Publications****	****	****       1,222****	****1,077****	****        13.5%**
**	**

## ePUBWATCH

**NUMBER OF PUBLICATIONS **
**	****	****	****	**_**Jan 2003**_**     **_**Nov 2002**_**      **_**Variance**_
**	****	****Daily****	****	****    116****	****              99****	****      17.2%**
**	****	****Weekly****	****	****    467****	****            350****	****      33.4%**
**Bi-Weekly****	****      43****	****	**** -****	****       N/A**
**Monthly****	****    492****	****            432****	****      13.9%**
**                           ****____________________________**
***Bi-Monthly****	****      84****	****	**** 77****	****        9.1%**
***Other****	****	****      57****	****            119****	****     -52.1%**
**	****	****	****	****	****      *****Complaints Only**

## ePUBWATCH

## ePUBWATCH

**TOTAL ePUBWATCHs**
**	****	****	****      **_**Jan 2003**_**     **_**Nov 2002**_**     **_**Difference**_
**   ****Active****	****           524****	****         468****	****	****↑**
**   ****Upcoming           68****	****           97****	****        ****	****↓**
**   ****Closed****	****         1830  ****	****           92****	****       ****	****↑**
**  **

## ePUBWATCH

## ePUBWATCH

**TOTAL COMPLAINTS**
**	****	****	****	****	**_**Jan 2003**_**    ****	****   **_**Nov 2002**_
**   ****Daily****	****	****	****      261****	****          75****	****       **
**   ****Weekly****	****	****       ****	****    2708****	****        778**
**   ****Bi-Weekly****	****	****        19****	****           -****	**
**   ****Monthly****	****	****	****        71****	****          43**
**   ****Bi-Monthly****	****	****      330****	****        219**
**   ****Other****	****	****	****      108      ****	****          76**** **

## ePUBWATCH

**ENHANCEMENTS**
**Bi-Weekly Frequency -  January 2003**
**Bi-Monthly Frequency - April 2003**
**RESUME MAINTENANCE MODE ONLY**
**FY 2004 BUDGET**