BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 702288

## 3-1

**3-1**

## Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients
Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration
(N = 212,000 in 287 trials)

**3-2**

**Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients**
**Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration**
**(N = 212,000 in 287 trials)**

**BMJ 324:71–86, 2002**

## Antiplatelet Meta-Analysis

**3-3**

**Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration, BMJ 324:71–86, 2002**

**Odds Ratio & 95% CI**

**Antiplatelet Worse**

**Antiplatelet Better**

**500-1500**

**160-325**

**75-150**

**< 75**

**ASA**
**Dose (mg)**

**14.5%**

**11.5%**

**10.9%**

**17.3%**

**12.9%**

**Any Aspirin**

**Anti-**
**platelet**

**Control**

**17.2%**

**14.8%**

**15.2%**

**19.4%**

**16.0%**

**34**

**19**

**12**

**3**

**65**

**No. of**
**Trials**

- 0

- 0.5

- 1

- 1.5

- 2

**Odds ********: 19%**

**26%**

**32%**

**13%**

**23%**

**Treatment effect**
**p < 0.0001**

**Antiplatelet Meta-Analysis**

**Endpoints: MI, Stroke, Vascular Death**

##  CURE Placebo+ASA Arm

**3-4**

**Primary Endpoint: MI, stroke or CV death**

**% of Patients with primary endpoint**

**p=0.003; <100mg vs >200mg p=0.001**

** ****CURE Placebo+ASA Arm**

**N=3,115**

**N=4,172**

**N=5,259**

****** ****100mg**

**110–162mg**

****** ****200mg**

## CURE Study: Placebo+ASA Arm

**3-15**

**Major Bleeding (including Life-Threatening)**

**CURE Study: Placebo+ASA Arm**

**% of Patients with Event**

**Source: Cure Study**

****** ****100mg**

**110–162mg**

****** ****200mg**

## Improved Compliance with Combination Tablet vs. Dual Therapy

**Jan-D-8**

**Improved Compliance with ****Combination Tablet vs. Dual Therapy**

**Diabetes****1****:**
**21% improvement in tablet consumption over 6 month period in previously treated patients**
**Hypertension:**
**13% improvement in tablet consumption over 12 month period****2**
**11% improvement in prescription renewal over 12 month period****3**
**HIV****4****:**
**9% reduction in missing even one dose over 16 week period**

- 1** White & Hopson (2002) Clin Ther - in press**
- 2** White & Hopson (2002) in press**
- 3 **Dezii (2000) Manag. Care**4 **Eron et al (2000) AIDS**
# Presentation: 720394

## FAA Partnership Conference2005

- Emergency Planning
- and
- Firefighting
- Class III Airports

- Ken Gilliam
- Senior Fire Safety Specialist
- Washington, DC

- Fort Worth Texas
- March 9 2005

## Class III Airports

- Serve scheduled operations of small air carrier aircraft
- Small air carrier aircraft: more than 9 but less than 31 passenger seats
- Index A: Less than 90’
- Index B: 90’ – less than 126’

## Emergency Planning

- WHY – why is an emergency plan needed?
- WHERE – where should you start?
- WRITING – writing the airport’s emergency plan

- 9 March 2005

## Writing the Plan

- AIRPORT EMERGENCY PLAN
- (AEP)
- Advisory Circular 150/5200-31
- January 27, 1989
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
- (FEMA)

- 9 March 2005

## Writing the Plan

- Jurisdiction – command and control
- Communications and Coordination
- Personnel
- Equipment
- Training

- 9 March 2005

## Firefighting

- Know your stuff
- Who are you?
- Resources
- Abilities and limitations

- 9 March 2005

## Firefighting

- Life
- Exposure
- Containment
- Extinguishment
- Salvage and overhaul

- 9 March 2005

## Firefighting

- Technology is KEY
- To
- Class III

- 9 March 2005

## Slide 9

- 9 March 2005

## Slide 10

- 9 March 2005

## Slide 11

- 9 March 2005

## Slide 12

- 9 March 2005

## Ken Gilliam

- Federal Aviation Administration
- Airport Safety & Operations AAS-310
- Senior Fire Safety Specialist
- 5950 Hazeltine National Drive Suite 400
- Orlando, FL 32822
- Phone: 407-812-6331, Ext. 134
- Phone: 407-886-1981
- Cell: 	   407-492-8379
- Fax:     407-812-6978
- E-mail: ken.gilliam@faa.gov

- 9 March 2005
# Presentation: 530368

## MODULE 6 OBJECTIVES

- Identify examples of challenging behaviors
- Develop and practice strategies for managing challenging behaviors

## CATEGORIES OF CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR

## ROLE PLAYING RESPONSIBILITIES

- Be as authentic as you can be in the role
- Don’t do irrational things just for fun
- If the facilitator tries to engage you, try to react in a genuine manner or in keeping with your role

## MODULE 6 KEY POINTS

- Under-participation, over-participation, or hostile or aggressive behaviors present special challenges
- Defuse these behaviors by thinking and acting quickly
- The goal is to reduce or eliminate the behaviors without affecting the person’s willingness to contribute in the future
# Presentation: 721532

## NRC’s Modeling Needs and Capabilities for Effective Emergency Response

- Stephen A. McGuire
- Incident Response Operations
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- (301) 415-6204    sam2@nrc.gov

## Chronology of ResponseEarly Phase - Nuclear Power Plants

- Significant malfunction detected by plant instruments
- Licensee declares emergency based on pre-established criteria
- Licensee notifies State first, NRC second

## Chronology of Response Early Phase - Nuclear Power Plants

- NRC makes decision on whether to staff it’s Emergency Operations Center
- Staffing could be as small as 3-4 people or up to 80
- Staffing should be largely complete in less than an hour

## Chronology of Response Early Phase - Nuclear Power Plants

- Communications links established and information collected
- Dose models will be run to determine appropriate protective actions for the public (e.g. evacuation, sheltering)
- The State makes the decision on whether to order protective actions
- NRC has advisory role

## Chronology of ResponseIntermediate Phase - Nuclear Power Plants

- This phase starts after the plume has passed
- Need to know whether relocation is necessary due to deposited radionuclides, whether interdiction of crops is necessary, and where there are decontamination needs

## Chronology of Response Intermediate Phase - Nuclear Power Plants

- Models should indicate the path of the plume and deposition patterns
- However, the need for protective actions will be determined primarily by field measurements
- FRMAC has the primary responsibility for making and analyzing field measurements

## Chronology of ResponseFuel Cycle / Radioactive Materials / Transportation

- Released quantities of radionuclides much smaller
- Often release would have taken place before NRC Emergency Operations Center staffed

## Chronology of ResponseFuel Cycle / Radioactive Materials / Transportation

- Licensee expected to notify local officials and recommend protective actions based on the nature of the accident
- Each accident type has a predetermined  protective action that was based on modeling of the release

## Necessary Model Features for NRC Emergency Response

- Built-in source term module
- Built-in dose projection capability
- Rapid runtime (minutes)
- Easy to use by occasional users
- Appropriate range (usually 10 miles)
- Must model dry and wet deposition
- Must model radiological decay and buildup in transit

## Current NRC Dose Model

- NRC has developed the RASCAL code to generate radiological source terms, estimate atmospheric transport and diffusion, and calculate doses to potentially exposed people
- NRC had already identified the needed criteria for it’s modeling needs and developed the RASCAL code to meet the needs

## RASCAL Descriptors

## RASCAL Descriptors

## RASCAL Descriptors
# Presentation: 689385

## Statement of theMedical Imaging Contrast Agent Association

- FDA Public Hearing on Combination Products
- November 25, 2002

**1.  Scope of Combination**
**           ****Product Regulation**

## Concomitant use products are not necessarily combination products

- Definition of combination product:
-    “drug, device, or biological product packaged separately that according to its . . . proposed labeling is intended for use only with an approved _individually specified_ drug, device, or biological product where both are required to achieve the intended use . . . and where upon approval of the proposed product the labeling of the approved product would need to be changed . . . .”  21 CFR 3.2(e)(3)

## Concomitant use products   combination products (cont.)

- Drug proposing to be used together with approved device marketed by another company (or vice versa) to achieve intended use is not a combination product unless the other product is “individually specified” in proposed labeling.
- “Definition of combination product is intended to exclude most concomitant use of drugs, devices, and biological products.”
-      56 Fed. Reg. 58754, 58755 (Nov. 21, 1991) (preamble)

## Concomitant use products   combination products (cont.)

- Example:  contrast agents and radiopharma-ceuticals used with diagnostic imaging devices.
- Drug labeling refers to type of procedure or general type of equipment, not “individually specified” device.
- Imaging devices and drugs have historically been regulated independently rather than as combination products
- No safety or efficacy issues due to independent regulatory paths.  Therefore, no reason for change.
- True medical imaging combination products are possible

**2.  “Timely and Effective” **
**Premarket Review**

## “Timely and Effective” Review

- Section 204 of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 reflects  Congress’s clear intent that combination products be reviewed in a “timely and effective” manner.

## “Timely and Effective” Review (cont.)

- Most combination medical imaging products will involve a drug.  Therefore, “timely and effective premarket review” of combination products will require timely review of the safety and efficacy of the drug component.
- MDUFMA § 204 makes it more important for FDA to ensure timely review by:
- Reducing times to approval for new medical imaging drugs and new indications of approved drugs
- Issuing a medical imaging drug guidance
# Presentation: 898809

## HV splitting

- Current caused by radiation damage
- Assume 15 fb-1, -10 deg C
- One HV ch/hybrid for L0-2
- Two HV ch/ stave  for L3
- One HV ch/stave for L4-5
- Max current < 0.6 mA => safety factor of 4-5
- Bira HV PS 2.3 mA & 3.2 mA

| Layer | Radius,mm | uA/strip | uA/hybrid | uA/stave |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 18 | 1.2 | 310 | NA |
| 1 | 35 | 0.46 | 360 | NA |
| 2 | 54 | 0.28 | 530 max | 1790 |
| 3 | 86 | 0.12 | 230 max | 770 |
| 4 | 116 | 0.06 | 180 max | 550 |

## HV channel count

- Proposed configuration gives total HV channel count of 492
- Now have 10 crates => 480 channels
- Minimum need : 12 motherboards, 280 “+” HV pods => ~ $135k
- 3 SMT racks allow for 12 crates => 576  channels
- Need 2 crates, 21 motherboards, 380 “+” HV pods => $225k
- Discussions underway to redesign PS
- Pod only or motherboard?
- Could be done by R.Yarema’s group
- Price could be lower by factor of 2(?) –guess at this point
- One engineer-year

## HV channel count

- Proposed configuration gives total HV channel count of 492
- Pro’s to keep the current system
- Specs are adequate for Run2B
- Performance is good
- All hardware and software infrastructure exists
- Same hardware can be used for production
- More channels can be used for Run 2A
- Currently have 10 crates, 440 HV channels (out of them 248 are positive)
- Propose to have full 11 crates; 528 + channels

## HV channel count

- Spares : 21% (spares + extra in MCH2 + SiDet)
- Total ~ $180k, need new quotes
- CINVESTAV can buy HV PS in 2002

|  | Crates | Mboards | + Pods | Spares count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a) Currently in MCH2 | 10 | 55 | 248 |  |
| b) Currently in SiDet | 1 | 4 | 16 |  |
| c) SiDet production | 2 | 10 | 80 |  |
| d) SiDet Run2B | 1 | 4 | 32 | 6.4 % |
| e) Ch count Run2B | 11 | 62 | 492 |  |
| f) MCH2 Run2B | 11 | 66 | 528 | 7.3 % |
| g) Balance (d+f)-(a+b) | 1 | 11 | 296 |  |
| h) Run2B SMT spares | 0 | 5 | 34 | 6.9 % |
| Total to buy (g+h) | 1 | 16 | 330 | 20.7 % |

## HV channel count

- Spare pods : 35% (spares + extra in MCH2 + SiDet)
- Total ~ $212k  (201k CINVESTAV)

|  | Crates | Mboards | + Pods | Spares count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a) Currently in MCH2 | 10 | 55 | 248 |  |
| b) Currently in SiDet | 1 | 4 | 16 |  |
| c) SiDet production | 2 | 10 | 80 |  |
| d) SiDet Run2B | 1 | 4 | 32 | 6.4 % |
| e) Ch count Run2B | 11 | 62 | 492 | = 100 % |
| f) MCH2 Run2B | 11 | 66 | 528 | 7.3 % |
| g) Balance (d+f)-(a+b) | 1 | 11 | 296 |  |
| h) Run2B SMT spares | 1 | 7 | 104 | 21.1 % |
| Total to buy (g+h) | 2 | 18 | 400 | 34.8 % |
# Presentation: 947090

- 86th Annual Meeting
- January 24,2007

##  The Use of Marketing Plans in FHWA’s Highway for LIFE Program

**Kathleen Bergeron, APR**
**Marketing Specialist, Program Coordinator**
**Highways for LIFE**
**Federal Highway Administration**
**Room 4136, HIHL**
**400 Seventh Street, SW**
**Washington, DC 20590**
**202/366-5508**
_**Kathleen.bergeron@fhwa.gov**_

## Highways for LIFE

**GOAL:**
**Enhance the driving experience **
**for the American Public**

## Highways for LIFE

**METHOD:**
**Accelerate the rate of adoption **
**of innovations and new technologies **

## Highways for LIFE

**Vanguard Technologies **

## Highways for LIFE

**Vanguard Technologies **
**Road Safety Audits**
**Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems**
**Making Work Zones Work Better**

## Highways for LIFE

**Teams must...**
**Have sponsorship of Associate Administrator for that area**
**Represent all areas of FHWA (field AND headquarters)**
**Include technical specialists AND a marketing specialist**
**Develop a marketing plan with first-year strategies and budgets**

## Highways for LIFE

**Steps in the Marketing Plan Development Process**
**Create of a very basic plan as a “straw man”**
**Send “straw man” plan to team as homework**
**Bring team together for two- or three-day retreat**
**Have team work through the process to make the plan their own **

*Note: FHWA is developing a guidebook for this approach.*

## Highways for LIFE

**Road Safety Audits Marketing Plan**
**First team to develop a plan**
**Important to set the tone for the others**
**Need to “get it right” the first time**

## The Success of the Road Safety AuditsMarketing Plan, Two Years On

**Louisa Ward**
**Team Leader, Road Safety Audits Implementation Team**
**Office of Highway Safety**
**Federal Highway Administration**
**400 Seventh Street SW, Room 3407**
**Washington, DC 20590**
**202/366-2218**
_**Louisa.ward@dot.gov**_
# Presentation: 075428

## Collaborative Sun-Earth Connector

- N. Hurlburt, P. Bose, S. Freeland, G. Slater
*LMATC*
- F. Hill, VSO/*NSO*
- R. Bentley, *EGSO/MSSL*
*Supported by NASA through contract NNH04CC00C.*

## Coordinated Observations

- How do we share data and coordinate observation between missions?

- VSO

## Coordinated Data Services

- CoSEC

- Generalized Services + orchestration

- WSDL/SOAP

- Solarsoft/ http or tcp

## Coordinated Analysis

- Distributed data analysis system using
- Scientific workflow systems
- Semantic composition & integration
- Existing SolarSoft services & tools
- Focused on solar and space physics service
- Collaborative environment for sharing data, software and higher-level products
- Complements existing efforts in Virtual Observatories

## Registering WSDL Services

## Registering SolarSoft Services

## Building Workflows

- 1. Start with concept

- 2. If it doesn’t exist,
- refine it recursively

- 3. When services
- exist,‘bind’ them

## CoSEC Client
# Presentation: 454794

## First Street Elementary SchoolCanonsburg, PA

- Dr. Dawn Nicolaus – Principal
- Ms. Patti Coyne – Reading Specialist

- And Let It Begin With Me...
- Accountability in one Elementary School

## First Street Facts

- Elementary School
- 240 students K – 4
- 84% Caucasian
- 14% African American
- <1% Hispanic
- <1% Asian
- 45% economically disadvantaged
- 13% special needs
- Title 1 School

- Neighborhood School
- Small town located 25 miles south of Pittsburgh
- 33 Faculty Members
- Assessments
- PSSA (Pennsylvania System of School Assessment)
- Terra Nova
- In View
- District Benchmarks
- STAR
- K-SEALS

## PSSA Results

- *4th Grade did not begin PSSA testing until 2005-2006

## PSSA Results

- *4th Grade did not begin PSSA testing until 2005-2006

## How did we achieve these results?

- “It’s not ***my*** job!”

## School Wide Theme

##  Parent Accountability

- September PFA meeting
- Pledge Sheets
- Parenting Professional
-  Development
- Volunteer Program
- Student Accountability
- Pledge Sheet

## Faculty Accountability

- September kick off for differentiated rotation groups  grades 1-4
- Peer Professional Development
- After school tutoring/Orton Gillingham sessions - four nights a week grades 1-4
- Part of determining school practices
- Team planning
- Monthly administrator meeting
- Weekly inclusion meeting

## Differentiated Groups

- Build
- It
- Anyway

## Peer Professional Development

- Dream
- It
- Anyway

## Student Accountability

- Love
- Them
- Anyway

## Summary Points

-   Accountability is...
- Not just testing
- Taking responsibility
- Meeting student needs
- Challenges Still Ahead
- Changing Student/Parent Population

- Music:  “Anyway”   by  Martina  McBride
# Presentation: 910938

## Strategic SourcingNovember 8, 2005

## Strategic Sourcing

- 	The structured process of  analyzing an organization’s spending and using this information to make business decisions about acquiring commodities and services more effectively and efficiently.

## OMB May 20, 2005 Letter

- Requires _**each Federal Agency and Department**_** **to:
- Implement Strategic Sourcing
- Identify _at least three_ commodities for strategic sourcing _**(due date: October 1, 2005)**_
- _Report annually_ to OFPP/OMB on progress – January 1, 2006
- Primary Responsibility by the Chief Acquisition Officer with support of Chief Financial Officers and Chief Information Officers
- Recognizes importance of joint relationships/support throughout each organization

## Customer Expectations of GSA

- Spend Analysis – Review and analyze agency spend data from multiple sources
- Procurement Assistance – GSA lead teams work with agencies - identifying requirements to contract award/administration
- E-tools – Work with agencies for virtual stores/other appropriate e –tools
- Training/education – Train agency personnel on contract vehicles/e-tools available

**GSA’s value proposition:  **
- The aggregate of GSA’s core competencies in marketing, policy, and acquisition represent a total solution for Federal agency strategic sourcing requirements.

## Discussion

- Partnering with GSA’s Headquarter Support Offices
- Office of Customer Accounts and Research
- Current Government Data
- Managing Data Forward

## Contact

- Pamela Mines
- Lead Market Analyst
- 1901 South Bell Street 603
-  Arlington VA 22202-4502
- Phone:(703) 605-5539
- Fax: (703) 308-0910
- Email: _[pam.mines@gsa.gov](mailto:pam.mines@gsa.gov)_
# Presentation: 686454

## NHIN / HISPC / SLHIE Joint Conference

**State Legislative Initiatives**
***May 1, 2008***
*Dallas, TX*
**April Rooks Smith**

## Legislative Foundation for E-Health in Kentucky

- Senate Bill 2 (SB2) was passed by the General Assembly in March 2005
- SB2 called for the development and implementation of a statewide Kentucky e-Health Network, or “KeHN”
- Had bi-partisan sponsorship and pass unanimously
- Codified as KRS 216.261-269
- House Bill 185 was passed in March 2007
- HB 185 gave KeHN Board the authority to create a public-private nonprofit corporation to facilitate the development and operations of the KeHN.

## Kentucky’s e-Health Governance Infrastructure

**SB 2--The Kentucky e-Health Network Board**
- 22-member board charged with developing and implementing Kentucky e-Health Network
- Attached to the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services for technical support and administrative purposes
**SB 2--The Kentucky Healthcare Infrastructure Authority**
- A partnership between the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville
- Research and development related to health care applications
**HB 185--The Kentucky e-Health Corporation**
- A nonprofit organization created to facilitate public-private partnerships

## Kentucky e-Health Network Board Committees

**E-Health Advisory Group **
**Privacy and Security Committee**
**Health IT Adoption Committee**
**Health Information Exchange Committee**
**Economic Development Committee**

## E-Health Initiatives in Kentucky

- Medicaid Transformation Grant-funded Kentucky Health Information Partnership (KHIP)
- Comprehensive Statewide e-Health Studies
- Medical Trading Areas
- Health Information Technology Adoption
- HISPC Privacy and Security Multi-state Collaborative participation (HSPL and PET)
- e-Prescribing Partnerships in Kentucky (ePPIK) Grant Program
- Annual Kentucky e-Health Summit

## HISPC Project in Kentucky

- HISPC was the first significant project undertaken by the new Kentucky e-Health Network Board
- Phase I engaged over 50+ volunteers, working with staff from CHFS, University of Kentucky and University of Louisville to assess Kentucky policy and practice
- The HISPC Steering Committee became the KeHN Board’s permanent Privacy and Security Committee
- Phase II: HIPAA Pre-emption Analysis completed and amended facility licensing regulatory language developed
- Phase III: Harmonizing State Privacy Law and Provider Education Collaborative participation

## Next Steps

**HIPAA**
**Baseline**

**Sect. 3(8)e**

**Sect. 3(6)(c)2**

**Sect. 4(3)e**

**|-------------------------|**
**Hospital Regulations**

**|-------------------------|**
**Renal Dialysis **
**Facilities**

**|-------------------------|**
**Skilled Nursing **
**Facilities**

**|-------------------------|**
**Personal Care Homes**

## For more information:

- _[http://ehealth.ky.gov](http://ehealth.ky.gov/)_
- _[Aprilr.smith@ky.gov](mailto:Aprilr.smith@ky.gov)_
# Presentation: 106470

## APS Controls

- Marty Kraimer
- APS

## Field Buses

- BITBUS
- Vacuum and Power Supplies
- Two VME Interfaces available
- Bitbus protocal good
- Interfaces bad
- Don’t use
- Allen Bradley
- I/O good for slow I/O
- SV1R scanner not good
- SNS developing new interfaces. May require PLC
- KOYO PLC
- GPIB
- Many devices. Good EPICS support
- Hope for evolution to Ethernet
- Serial – Mainly for monitoring Conventional Facilities
- Future
- CAN
- DSP based solution for Power Supplies

## Managing EPICS Databases

- Follow guidelines from
- EPICS IOCSoftware ConfigurationManagement
- Document available Online
- Chapter 7 explains APS/ASD Configuration Management Procedures
- Similar to exampleApp
- Highlights
- All human edited files under CVS control
- All support available as releases
- IOC applications
- Managed on a branch
- Small changes can be made easily
- Large changes require a new branch

## IOC ApplicationsDirectory Structure

- /usr/local/iocapps/
- r3.13.x/
- support
- ioc
- iocinfo
- bootlog
- iocxxx – message written when ioc booted
- iocdata
- iocxxx – location of ioc
- pvdata
- iocxxx – list of record names. Generated at boot.
- iocerrorlog
- ...
- adlsys
- opysys
- ...

## SupportDirectory Structure

- /usr/local/iocapps/R3.13.2/support
- PSCU/
- 1-3
- ...
- allenBradley
- base
- bitBus
- ... Altogether >20 support directories
- Some are APS specific
- Some are unbundled EPICS products

## IocDirectory Structure

- /usr/local/iocapps/R3.13.2/ioc
- booster/
- 1/ - This is branch
- linac/
- ... Altogether 18 separate applications
- Ioc/booster/1
- bpmApp/
- bpmDb/
- ... other Db directories
- Src/
- ...App – altogether 11 Apps
- iocBoot
- Ioc... - altogether 18 iocs

## High Level Applications

- Controls Group not responsible
- Operations Analysis Group
- Mike Borland is group leader
- Based on SDDS Toolkit
- TCL/TK for SDDS Operator Interface
- PEM – Procedure Execution Manager
- Invoke
- Monitor
- Create
- runcontrol record coordinates HLA
- Soft record
- Library provided for workstation apps
- Implements a semaphore
- Can be reset if an application crashes
# Presentation: 200606

## DOE ISM Manual(DOE M 450.4-1)

- Presentation to the EFCOG
- ISM Program Managers Meeting
- David Compton
- (DOE-HQ HS-1.1 Support)
- November 1, 2006

## DOE ISM ManualHistory

- Obtained concurrences 2/06; Deferred issuance pending 2004-1 IP Re-Review
- Obtained concurrences 8/06; Deferred issuance to address new HSS organization
- Obtained concurrences 10/06; Processing for Final Approval –       Approved 11/1/06 and posted at www.doeism.gov.

## DOE ISM ManualMajor Changes

- Full ISM Verifications, As Needed – Not every five years
- Approvals for DOE Site ISM programs by DOE Site Managers not HQ
- New DOE HSS Organization Addressed
- DOE ISM Champion Roles Clarified

## DOE ISM ManualMajor Elements

- DOE ISM System Descriptions
- Annual Safety Performance Objectives, Measures and Commitments
- Annual ISM Effectiveness Reviews
- Annual ISM Declarations
- Full ISM Verifications, As Needed

## DOE ISM ManualFull ISM Verifications

- Significant changes in leadership
- Significant changes in mission
- Significant changes in approach
- Loss of confidence in existing ISM system
- Significant problem(s) or poor performance
- Significant findings

## DOE ISM ManualCRD Requirements

- Develop ISM System; Maintain Cognizant of DOE System Description
- Annual ISM Reviews; Updates to System Descriptions; Declarations
- Describe ISM Maintenance/Continuous Improvement Process
- Identify Site-Wide Opportunities

## DOE ISM ManualAttachment 2

- ISM Principles and Attributes for Effective ISM Implementation
- _Supplemental Safety Culture Elements_

- -  Individual Attitude & Responsibility for Safety
- -  Operational Excellence
- -  Oversight for Performance Assurance
- -  Organizational Learning for Perf. Improvement

## DOE ISM ManualImplementation Schedule

- HQ ISM System Descriptions – May 2007
- Field ISM System Descriptions – Nov 2007
- Field Implementation – Nov 2008
- HQ Implementation – May 2009

## DOE ISM ManualISM Champions Council

- Purpose: Support Line Management
- Promote Communications
- Promote Continuous Learning
- Sponsor ISM Workshops
- Provide Input and Feedback

## DOE ISM ManualOther ISM Directives

- DOE P 450.4, *ISM Policy*
- DOE G 450.4‐1B, *ISM System Guide *
*DOE‐HDBK‐3027‐99, ISM Systems Verification Team Leader's Handbook*
- DEAR 970.5223‐1, *Integration of environment, safety, and health into work planning and execution*

## DOE ISM Manual

- Questions?
- _OPI for ISM Manual_
- Dr. Patricia Worthington (HS-10)
- 301-903-5392
- Pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov
- David Compton (HS-1.1 Support)
- 202-586-1034
- David.compton@hq.doe.gov
# Presentation: 047244

## Toward a Model of the Networked Community

- Systemic Model of Local Community
- Demographics of Diffusion
- Diffusion via Social Networks
- Social Engagement vs Civic Engagement
- Four Community Network Cases Studies
- Community Organizations and the Net
- Best Practices among CN projects

## Social Status and Community Involvement

- 	**Income and Education by Community Involvement**
**(Pearson Correlation)**
**	****	****	****N****	****Sig****	****Community Involvement**
**Education**	407	.002		.153**
**Income**	377	.000		.203**
- ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

## Internet Use and Community Involvement

**Internet Users versus Non-users **
**and Community Involvement**
**(Pearson Correlation)**
**	****	****	****	****	****	****	****Community**
- 				_**SD**_**	**_**N**_**	**_**Sig**_**	**_**Involvement**_**	**
**Use Internet **	.6582	504	.004	.127**
**Use CN**		.4157	420	.002	.149**
- ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

## Social Status and Early Adoption

**Income and Education by Length of Internet Use**
**(Pearson Correlation)**
- 				_**SD**_**	**_**N**_**	**_**Sig**_**	**_**Years of Use**_**	**
**Education**		.8895	390	.000	.269**
**Income**		3.27	360	.003	.156**
- ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

## Differences by Length of Internet Use(ANOVA)

- 					Early 	Later Adopter
- _Civic Engagement_ 		_Mean_	_Mean_	_Significance Test_
- Work to bring change		2.31	2.06	F=6.793, p<.01
- Distribute Political Info		1.66	1.44	F=4.161, p<.05
- Attend Civic Org Meetings	2.05	1.93	F=6.961, p<.01

## Early Adopters Online Civic Engagement

- 					Early	Later Adopter
- _Online Political Activity_ 		_Mean_	_Mean_	_Significance Test_
- Online petition			1.49	1.27	F=4.446, p<.05
- Email Govt Official		1.96	1.58	F=10.309, p<.001
- Discuss Issues Online		1.71	1.35	F=10.309, p<.05
- Volunteer activity		1.28	1.12	F=4.669, p<.05
- Obtain Political Info		2.62	1.88	F=22.605, p<.001
- Visit Political Website		2.22	1.66	F=16.279, p<.001
- Visit Local Civic Site		3.09	2.75	F=5.822, p<.05

## Increased Involvement since Net Access

- 					Early	Later Adopter
- 					_Mean_	_Mean_	_Significance Test_
- Involved w/Issues		2.42	2.27	F=5.533, p<.05
- Involved w/Community	2.07	1.92	F=13.228, p<.001
- Connected w/People		2.45	2.23	F=11.515, p<.001
# Presentation: 783563

## Characterization of delivery systems for nanomedicine 

**Characterization of delivery systems for nanomedicine **
**Dr. John A. Dagata**

## Benefits and advantages of nanomedicine:

**Benefits and advantages of nanomedicine:**

- Targeted nanoparticle delivery systems
- One of the most promising nanomedicine platforms
- Use an engineered virus-like particle to direct therapeutics & diagnostics only to cancer cells
- Lower dosage
- Reduced costs & side effects

## NIST-NCI-FDA Alliance: 

- Impact of healthcare costs on the US economy
- Protocols and standards for faster move into clinical trials
- CNPlan (NCI 2004)
- Critical Path Initiative (FDA 2004)

**Technology:**
- Methodologies for nonspecific adhesion of bio-nanoparticles to surfaces for high-magnification imaging and characterization

## Commercial Applications:

- Drug discovery and development
- Quality assurance (manufacturability and potency)
- Environmental health & safety

## Drug discovery and development

*(collaboration with Esther Chang, Georgetown University Medical Center)*

## Metrology of soft material:

**Metrology of soft material:**
- Small sample volume (10 L)
- Adjustment of solution properties (essential for actual drug formulations)
- Fluid scanning probe microscopy of intact liposomes
- Non-optical statistical size distribution and zeta potential

- SPM tip

- SPIO NDS

- tip probing liposome

- tip probing SPIO

## Collaboration Opportunities:

- CRADA
- SBIR
**For technical details see the posters:**
*Physical characterization of liposome-based targeted nanoparticle delivery systems with encapsulated MRI contrast agents*
*Imaging, characterization, and manipulation of nanobioparticles: Fluid scanning probe and surface zeta potential measurements of targeted delivery systems*
- N. Farkas, et al.

## Contact Information:

**Contact Information:**
- John A. Dagata
- Precision Engineering Division
- Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory
- National Institute of Standards & Technology
- 100 Bureau Drive MS 8212
- Gaithersburg MD 20899-8212
- 301-975-3597 tel.
- 301-869-0822 fax
- john.dagata@nist.gov
# Presentation: 513485

## The Human Language and Communication (HLC) Program

- Mary P. Harper

## Contact Information

- Mary P. Harper, _[mharper@nsf.gov](mailto:mharper@nsf.gov)__  (703) 292-8729_
- Karen Kukich, _[kkukich@nsf.gov](mailto:kkukich@nsf.gov)__ (703) 292-8930_

## HLC Program Mission

- The goal is to advance the state of the art in computer processing of **text, speech,** and **multi-modal communication.**
**Deepen our understanding** of the underlying intent and realization of these communicative forms.
**Encourage** **research that promotes** **sharable** **language data resources**, modular, extendible and reusable code, tools, and evaluation metrics and methods.
**Build a solid base of research findings to** **support timely application** of language technology to critical needs, e.g., homeland security, teaching and learning ....

## Examples of Recent Awards

**Speech**

**Text**

**Other**
**Modalities**

- Abney &** **Collins

- Kirchhoff

- Badler

- Sekine

- Alwan

- Nelson

- Peskin

- Allen

- Espy-Wilson

- Brennan

- Liu

- Lee

## Examples of Recent Awards

**Text**
- _Abney & Collins_: Semantic Entity and Relation Extraction from Web-Scale Text Document Collections
- _Sekine_:  ITR: On-Demand Information Extraction
- _Liu_: On Partially Supervised Text Classification
- _Lee_: Graph-based Approaches to Text Processing

**Text & Speech**
- _Kirchhoff_: Using Machine Translation to Bootstrap Speech Recognition Systems
- _Allen_: Continuous Understanding
- _Ostendorf_: ITR: Applying Translation Technology to Language Modeling
- _Rambow_: Arabic Dialect Modeling for Speech and Natural Language Processing

## Examples of Recent Awards

**Speech**
- _Waibel_: ITR: Domain Unlimited Speech Translation
- _Espy-Wilson_: Acoustic-Phonetic Knowledge and Speech Recognition
- _Brennan_: ITR: Adaptive Spoken Dialog with Human and Computer Partners
- _Hirschberg_: Dialogue Prosody in Interactive Voice Response Systems
- _Peskin_: Modeling Idiosyncracies in Speaking Behavior

**Other Modalities (+ Text or Speech)**
- _Badler_: Synthesis and Acquisition of Communicative Gestures
- _Nelson_: Grounding Language in Visual Percepts
- _Neidle_: Pattern Discovery in Signed Languages and Gestural Communication
- _Stone_: Making discourse visible: Realizing conversational facial displays in interactive agents

## Outside Co-funding in FY’03

- Medium ITR and Regular Program Proposals
- Identified Proposals of Interest
- Participated in Review Panel
- Peer Review Panel and Program Manager Input
- ITIC supplements to NSF PI’s

## HLC Sponsored Workshop Activities

**Directions in Dialogue Processing (May 31, 2003)**
**NSF Symposium on Next Generation ASR (October 7-8, 2003)**
**Perspectives on Speech Separation Workshop (October 31-November2, 2003)**
**Perceptive Animated Interfaces and Virtual Humans (date to be determined)**
# Presentation: 685017

## Preliminary Results from 23-year integrations of fully coupled atmosphere (GFS)-ocean (MOM3) models

***Glenn White***
- Runs carried out by Wan-qui Wang
- With 28 and 64 levels in GFS

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

## Slide 28

## Slide 29

## Slide 30

## Slide 31

## Slide 32

## Slide 33

## Slide 34

## Slide 35

## Slide 36

## Slide 37

## Slide 38

## Slide 39

## Slide 40

## Slide 41

## Slide 42

## Slide 43

## Slide 44

## Slide 45

## Global Ocean Surface Energy Budget

***Global Ocean Surface Energy Budget***

- COADS

- satellite

- reanalyses

- obs SST

## Slide 47

## Slide 48

## Slide 49

## Slide 50

## Slide 51

## Slide 52
# Presentation: 084072

## Adapting PTWC’s Real-TimeTsunami Travel Time Displayfor Science on a Sphere

**Nathan Becker**
**Pacific Tsunami Warning Center**
**SOS Users Collaborative Network Workshop**
**31 July 2008**

## PTWC’s Mission

**Provide warnings of tsunamis to the public and to organizations responsible for public safety in coastal areas of the Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean (since 2005) and the Caribbean Sea (since 2006) **
**Rapidly detect phenomena that cause tsunamis and assess their tsunami potential**
**Detect and monitor tsunamis when they occur, predict when they will arrive at affected coastlines, and continue to provide updated information about tsunamis throughout their duration**

## PTWC Operations Room

## How It Works

**C-shell scripts running under Red Hat Linux making calls to off-the-shelf open-source software packages:**
**Generic Mapping Tools (GMT v.4)**
**Tsunami Travel Time (TTT v.3, from Geoware)**
- shallow-water wave approximation with a Huygens construction method
**XPlanet**
**ImageMagick**
**espeak with MBROLA for text-to-speech synthesis**
**Images displayed by “slide-show” software:**
**Screensaver**
**SOS slideshow display**

## Hypocenter Map

## Regional Tsunami Travel Time

## Global Tsunami Travel Time Map

## TTT Map + 1 Hour

## TTT Map + 2 Hours

## TTT Map + 3 Hours 

## TTT Map + 4 Hours

## TTT Map + 5 Hours

## TTT Animationson the Sphere

**Historical Tsunamis:**
**Aleutians, Alaska,  April 1, 1946**
**Chile,  May 22, 1960**
**Indonesia,  December 26, 2004**
# Presentation: 522319

## Office of Health, Safety and Security

**Office of**
**Resource Management**

**Office of Health, Safety and Security**

**Office of **
**Headquarters**
**Security Operations**

**Office of **
**Special Operations**

**Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer**

** ****Deputy Chief**
**for Operations**

** ****Deputy Chief for**
**Enforcement and **
**Technical Matters**

**HS-1**

**HS-1**

**HS-1.1**

**HS-1.3**

**HS-1.31**

**HS-1.32**

**HS-1.33**

**HS-1.2**

**Office of **
**Personnel Security**

**Departmental**
**Representative**

**Office of**
**Security Operations**

**Office of**
**Business Operations**

**HS-1.21**

**Office of**
**Information Management**

**Office of**
**Human Resources**
** ****and Administration**

**HS-1.22**

**HS-1.23**

**Office of**
**Health and **
**Safety**

**Office of **
**Illness and Injury**
**Prevention **
**Programs**

**Office of**
**International**
**Health Studies**

**HS-10**

**Office of **
**Worker Safety and**
**Health Assistance**

**Office of**
**Worker Safety **
**and Health Policy**

**Office of**
**Former Worker Screening Programs**

**HS-11**

**HS-12**

**HS-13**

**HS-14**

**HS-15**

**Office of**
**Nuclear Safety**
**and Environment**

**Office of**
**Nuclear Safety and**
**Environmental Policy**

**Office of**
**Nuclear Safety**
**and Environmental**
**Assistance**

**HS-20**

**HS-21**

**HS-22**

**Office of**
**Corporate Safety Analysis**

**Office of **
**Corporate**
**Safety Programs**

**Office of **
**Analysis**

**HS-30**

**HS-31**

**HS-32**

**Office of**
**Enforcement**

**Office of **
**Price-Anderson**
**Enforcement**

**Office of **
**Security**
**Enforcement**

**Office of **
**Worker Safety and Health**
**Enforcement**

**HS-40**

**HS-41**

**HS-43**

**HS-42**

**National**
**Training **
**Center**

**Office of**
**Security Training**
**Operations**

**Office of**
**Safety Training**
**Operations**

**HS-50**

**HS-51**

**HS-52**

**Office of**
**Environment, **
**Safety and Health **
**Evaluations**

**Office of**
**Independent**
**Oversight**

**Office of**
**Security **
**Evaluations**

**Office of**
**Cyber Security**
**Evaluations**

**Office of**
**Emergency**
**Management **
**Oversight**

**HS-60**

**HS-61**

**HS-62**

**HS-63**

**HS-64**

**Office of**
**Security **
**Policy**

**Office of**
**Policy**

**Office of**
**Foreign Visits **
**and Assignments**

**HS-70**

**HS-71**

**HS-72**

**Office of**
**Security Technology **
**and Assistance**

**Office of**
**Security**
**Assistance**

**Office of**
**Technology**

**HS-80**

**HS-81**

**HS-82**

**Office of**
**Classification**

**Office of **
**Quality**
**Management**

**Office of**
**Technical **
**Guidance**

**Office of**
**Document **
**Reviews**

**HS-90**

**HS-91**

**HS-92**

**HS-93**
# Presentation: 536112

## Pacific Island Weather – Hot or Not?

- Aileen Ortega Canos
- FB Leon Guerrero Middle School
- Yigo, GUAM

## PURPOSE

- To use NASA satellite data to compare surface temperature and precipitation of different islands in the Pacific Ocean

## LEARNING OUTCOMES

- Students will be able to:
- Make inferences about an area’s climate based on interpreting data on a weather graph
- Create graphs using Microsoft Excel
- Explain the difference between weather and climate

## Part 1 and 2:  Obtaining Temperature and Precipitation Data

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Guam 13 N, 144 E 

**Aleutian Islands 54 N, 164 W**

**Guam 13 N, 144 E**

**Fiji 18 S, 175 E**

## QUESTIONS:

**How do you think location (latitude and longitude) affects the weather on each Pacific island?**
**How does temperature and precipitation differ in Guam and Fiji?  How are they similar?**
**Why is the weather at the Aleutian Islands different from the weather found at Guam and Fiji?**
**What kind of climate region (tropical, dry, moderate, continental, polar) can you expect to see if you visit Guam? Fiji? the Aleutian Islands? **
**How is the weather graph you created similar to a climograph?  **
**How does this weather graph differ from a climograph?**

## Climographs

- Summarize the climate of a location on a single diagram.
- Average monthly temperature and precipitation in a given location are plotted in a single graph.
- Temperature is plotted using a line graph.
- Precipitation is shown using a bar graph.
- Both graphs are placed on a single graph to create a climograph.

## Slide 11
# Presentation: 425536

## MIB Modernization Projectwww.doi.gov/modernization

**March Newsletter: Available at the door and will be posted along with previous editions on the website.**

## Updated web design

## Phase III (wing 4) to Phase IV (wing 3) Transition

**Phase IV - Moves Start (November 2007)**
**60 day duration for moves**
**2 week “air out”**
**8000 s.f. space shortage**
**North Penthouse will be re-opened with the next phase**

- 

## 	Out of Phase Work

**Gymnasium- (July 2007 completion)**
** ****Re-roofing and skylight installation on schedule**
** ****Basketball Court- 2 systems wood for court areas and urethane for weight machines.**
**Cafeteria- (schedule undetermined)**
**closure will not coincide with the phase transition**
**Blast Window Protection ( procurement stage)**
**Vehicle Arrest System- Bollards (remedial action) **

## Environmental and Indoor Air Quality

**Indoor Air Quality**
**Bi-weekly IAQ Forum in room # 2507 (all are invited )**
**(Mon. 2:00 pm to 3:00 p.m.)**
**Next meeting Monday March 26, 2007**
**Environmental**
**All ACM Abatement activity has been moved to “off-hours”**
**DOI safety and environmental audit was completed –modernization responded to each action item.**

## Thank you

**Next TUG meeting is May 24, 2007**
**We would love to entertain your suggestions for future topics!**
# Presentation: 709483

## FAR DETECTOR:

- FD live time was 95.7% for cosmics last week (ROP7 problems reported at last week's meeting spilled downtime into this week's report).
-  Dynode threshold calibration also contributed to downtime.
- All rack filter maintenance completed.
- _NEAR DETECTOR_:
- PMT replaced, light leak tracked down and taped up.
- PMT expert is here this week to help track down the last subtle issues before beam arrives.
- _NuMI Horn 1 Replacement Status_:
- Horn 1 is all hooked up and ready to run.
- Last week Thursday, performed the horn alignment beam scan.

## Sweep proton beam across horns.

- Measure position of proton beam with beam position monitors  and secondary emission monitors upstream of the target.
- Use measurements to extrapolate the beam position at the location of the horns.

- Drift space

- Target and Baffle out

## Sweap primary proton beam across alignment bars
Target must be out
One on the downstream end of Horn 1
One on each end of Horn 2
Also steer beam into horn 1 aperature
Two ion chambers measure particle spray 
One downstream of each horn

- Sweap primary proton beam across alignment bars
- Target must be out
- One on the downstream end of Horn 1
- One on each end of Horn 2
- Also steer beam into horn 1 aperature
- Two ion chambers measure particle spray
- One downstream of each horn

## Preliminary

- Horn 2

- Horn 1

- Horizontal Position of Proton Beam (mm)

|  | X-Center (mm) | X-Angle (mrad) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Horn 1 | -0.79 +/- 0.3 | -0.2 +/- 0.2 |
| Horn 2 | -1.74 +/- 1.0 | -0.3 +/- 0.4 |
|  | Y-Center (mm) | Y-Angle (mrad) |
| Horn 1 | 0.62 +/- 0.3 | 0.23 +/- 0.2 |
| Horn 2 | -0.19 +/- 1.0 | -0.09 +/- 0.4 |

**Preliminary**

- Proton beam intercepting the Alignment bar

- Proton beam intercepting the Alignment bar

- Proton beam intercepting horn aperature

## Schedule for this Week:

- Monday: Target module back into chase, hook up z-drive motor cable, hook up water to target, helium lines and electrical, reinstall upstream shielding.
-  Tuesday: Target module top fiducial survey using laser tracker (am).  Advance target into horn LE10 position remotely via ACNET while monitoring position with crane camera.
-  Wednesday: Install Target T-Blocks and survey plugs. Install R-block installation. Complete air seal/vapor barrier on shielding plug. Start Target Hall clean up.
- Thursday: general removal of all equipment, remove workcell hydraulics and secure workcell. Leak check for air leaks on target chase. Search & Secure and run Beam by early evening and align target with proton beam.
# Presentation: 680243

## 	International Classification of External Causes of InjuriesICECI

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## Brief history (1)

- - Based on several initiatives
- - 80s-90s
- - Worldwide

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## 	CMG members

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

**	****CMG members**

- Executive group:
- - Marijke de Kleijn
- - James Harrison
- Saakje Mulder

- Members:
- - Lee Annest
- - Lois Fingerhut
-  Birthe Frimodt Møller
-  Yvette Holder
- - Robert Jakob
- - Susan Mackenzie
- - Ian Scott
- - Bertrand Thélot

## 	Design of ICECI

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

**	****Design of ICECI**

- - Multi-axial
- - Hierarchical
- - Modular
- - Pick and choose
- - All injury

## Contents of ICECI

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## Brief history (2)

- - March ’01		Version 1.0
- - September ’02	Version 1.1
- - October ’03		Version 1.1a
- - November ’03	Acknowledgement WHO
- - July ’04	   	Version 1.2

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## Relation ICD

- - Complements Chapter XX of ICD-10

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

- - ICD-10 framework: bridge

- - ICD update reference committee: member

- - WHO collaborating center for the FIC: secretariat

## Translations

- - French		Version 1.1
- - English		Version 1.2
- - Spanish 		Version 1.2
- - Portuguese		Version 1.2

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

- IDB
- - Large parts
- - Different languages

## Relation WHO

- - Public domain
- - Custodianship with CMG

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## 	Use of ICECI for surveillance

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

**	****Use of ICECI for surveillance**

- - Select data elements (incl. modules)
- - Select level of detail per data element
- - Add data elements not external cause related

**Use of ICECI**

- - Emergency Department surveillance
- - Other surveillance
- - Surveys
- - ...............

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## Users questionnaire

- - 2006
- - 22 responses
- - Exchange of experiences

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## Agenda CMG Saturday

- - Minor updates
- - Major updates***	***
- - Improving communication/training users
- - Redeveloping mechanism section
- - Spinal cord injuries / burns

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

## 	Website

**International Classification of External Causes of Injuries**

**	****Website**

- 	                     www.RIVM.nl/WHO-FIC
# Presentation: 373537

## Verification through User Value:Or ‘How to AvoidDrinking Your Own Bathwaterin Ubicomp Evaluations’

- Dr. Christopher A. Miller
- Harry B. Funk
- 30 September 2001
- Ubicomp-01  Atlanta, GA

## Validation and Verification

- Evaluation – did we do a good job?

## Comprehensive Test

- Want entire system tested

## Gold Standard

- Testing complex systems...

- requires knowing the “right” outcome

## Recommendations

- Start with use cases – known, specific examples of ‘correct’ behavior