BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 239043

## INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO COUNTERMEASURE DESIGN

**P.F. Lagasse, Ph.D., P.E.**
**Transportation Research Board**
**2002 Annual Meeting**
**Sponsored By**
**A2A03 Committee on Hydrology,**
**Hydraulics and Water Quality**

## 1998 SCANNING REVIEWEUROPEAN PRACTICE FORBRIDGE SCOUR AND STREAM INSTABILITY COUNTERMEASURESSponsored by FHWA, TRB, AASHTO

## OBJECTIVES

Review and Document innovative techniques to mitigate the effects of scour and stream instability at bridges.
Evaluate for potential application in the U.S.
Share information on U.S. practice with counterparts.

**Review**** and ****Document**** innovative techniques to mitigate the effects of scour and stream instability at bridges.**
**Evaluate**** for potential application in the U.S.**
**Share**** information on U.S. practice with counterparts.**

## RIPRAP

**Most common countermeasure**
**Permanent**** countermeasure against pier scour**
**Specialized equipment for placing**
**Quality control**
**Partially grouted riprap**

## FILTERS

**Laboratory testing of geotextiles**
**Geotextile containers**
**Geotextile mats**
**Fascine mats**

## APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

**Riprap and Filters**
**Partially Grouted Riprap**
**Update of FHWA HECs**

## NCHRP PROJECT 24-07(2)
COUNTERMEASURES TO PROTECT
BRIDGE PIERS FROM SCOUR

**COUNTERMEASURES TO PROTECT**
**BRIDGE PIERS FROM SCOUR**

**OBJECTIVES**
**TO DEVELOP AND RECOMMEND:**
**(a)****	****PRACTICAL SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ****	****	****BRIDGE PIER SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES**
**(b)****	****GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ****	****	****DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION**
**(c)****	****GUIDELINES FOR INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, ****	****AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION**

## NCHRP PROJECT 24-07(2)
COUNTERMEASURES TO PROTECT
BRIDGE PIERS FROM SCOUR

**COUNTERMEASURES TO PROTECT**
**BRIDGE PIERS FROM SCOUR**

**THE COUNTERMEASURES TO BE CONSIDERED INCLUDE RIPRAP, PARTIALLY GROUTED RIPRAP, CABLE-TIED (ARTICULATING CONCRETE) BLOCKS, GABIONS, GROUT-FILLED BAGS AND MATS, AND GEOTEXTILE SAND CONTAINERS (USED AS A STAND-ALONE COUNTERMEASURE OR AS A FILTER)**

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

## Slide 28

## Slide 29

## Slide 30
# Presentation: 893180

## Beams Week in Review

- Accelerator Performance
- Week 81 integrated Luminosity : Record 4.79 pb-1
- Store 1775 Average Peak Luminosity: 2.85 E31
- Integrated Luminosity for FY2002: 80.28 pb-1
- Pbar Stacking Rate reached 12.43 mA/hr for 1 hr

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Beams Week in Review

- Notable Changes and Improvements
- Consistent use of Tevatron pbar closure
- Further optimization of pbar coalescing in MI
- Pbar Beam loading compensation operational
- Improvements in stacking rate

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Beams Week in Review

| Store # | Initial Luminosity | Duration | Termination | comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1739 | 1.98   E31 | 18  hours | Intentional | TEL on; BLC tuned    |
| 1748 | 2.14  E31 | 7.45  hours | intentional | No BLC  |
| 1750 | 2.57   E31 | 17.75  hours | intentional | BLT on pbars  |
| 1752 | 1.93   E31 | 18.1   hours | intentional | No BLC; BLT on pbars |
| 1754
1756 | 1.96  E31
1.9  E31 | 16.5   hours
16.75 hrs
 | Intentional
intentional | “ 
“ |

*Store Summary Week 80*

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Beams Week in Review

- Current Issues
- Increase the number of protons through MI coalescing
- Increase MI pbar coalescing efficiency to the 80 - 90% level
- Reduce proton and pbar bunch length into tevatron
- Increase proton and pbar lifetime at 150 GeV
- Reduce losses of proton  and pbar on ramp
- MI – Tevatron transfer line matching
- Increase Luminosity lifetime
- Improvement in pbar stacking rate

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Accelerator Studies

- Major focus for studies *should* result in near term gains in Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Accelerator Studies, Tevatron

- Tevatron Tune and Coupling Drift
- Tevatron Dampers (two shifts)
- MI-Tev lattice matching for A1 and P1 transfer lines
- Loss on ramp vs longitudinal emittance
- 150 Gev lifetime optimization using octupoles

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Accelerator Studies, Main Injector

- Reduction of longitudinal emittance for proton coalescing
- Main Injector 150 Gev closed orbit phase advance and dispersion measurement
- Main Injector 150 Gev lattice function measurement using TBT
- Tev-A1-MI optics verification
- Using reverse protons from tevatron
- First turn flash orbit

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Accelerator Studies, Pbar

- Re-phasing Debuncher cooling systems
- Characterization of AP2 aperture
- Characterization of Debuncher aperture

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

##  Schedule for this week

- Accelerator Studies
- Stack ‘n Store
*Breaking Records*

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002

## Schedule for this Week

- All Experimenters Meeting

- 23 September 2002
# Presentation: 228675

## ILC Beam Physics Simulation in AMR/CD

- Paul Lebrun
- Panagiotis Spentzouris

## Outline (P.L.) 

- Low Emittance Transport (LET) in the Main Linac.
**The preservation of the transverse emittance is a necessary condition for high luminosity of the collider **
**“****Parasitic”: ... details could ( or simply don’t ) matter **
- Simulation Tools & Benchmark Studies.
**Software Frameworks: **
- FNAL (CHEF)  + other institutions + Industry.
**Computing System **

## Outline (P.S.)

- Damping Ring Simulation.
**Collective effects: Electron Cloud.**
- SuperConducting Crab Cavity Simulation.

## The Team

- Joint Effort with TD and AD:
**in AMR/CD:**
- Gustavo Cancelo, LLRF Simulation.
- Lynn Garren: Code Benchmark, CHEF support & porting to MAC
- Valentin Ivanov: Beam steering algorithm in linear systems, Crab-cavity simulation.
- Paul Lebrun: Benchmark on LET, Steering algorithms
- Leo Michellotti : CHEF development.
- Panagiotis Spentzouris: Damping Ring, e-cloud.
**In TD and AD  : **
- M. Church , Kirti Ranjan, N. Solayk, Alex Valishev,
**Integrated into the ILC Beam Physics group**
- Leaders: Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK), Daniel Schulte (CERN)

## Low Emittance Transport

- Major Sources of emittance dilution in the RTML/Main Linac:
**Misaligned lattice leads to spurious dispersion. **
- Mis-alignement are both “static” (e.g., construction defects, or tolerance) and dynamic: vibrations and ground motion.
**Acceleration off-axis causes wake-fields, which in turns disrupt the bunch. **
- Mitigation:
**Cavity shape **
**Steer the beam to tune the dispersion to its design value and center the beam in the cavity. **

## Benchmarking LET Simulation Codes

- Is the emittance growth “real” or comes with fake “parasites”, i.e. bugs in our codes?
**Extensive and thorough benchmarks between codes**
- to convince newcomers...
- Improve our codes, compare programming techniques.
**Integrate: need for dynamical simulation, from Damping Ring. **
- Complexity of this integration has been perhaps under-estimated.
- CPU intensive: We will need to run on farms.
**Local code (i.e., CHEF) vs codes from other institutions (Desy, SLAC, CERN) **

## Steering to minimize Dispersion

- Recent results in CHEF
- Based on many previous studies, done with the other codes.
- First cheat a bit! : No cavity displacement, static problem, perfect BPM (resolution << 1 micron)
- Plan to relax many of these conditions and simulate many defects.
- Race condition: can we steer faster than the machine moves?

- Less than 0.5 nmRad growth. *But...*

## Dynamic Steering. 

- With a simpler
- model of the same lattice
- Units are in meter.
- Yes, a fraction of 1 micron counts.

## 4 Models of Ground Motion, of typical sites

## Conclusion

- In FY06: Investing..
**LET Code benchmark.**
**New Codes, new beam physics for us. **
**Implementation of Steering algorithms in our local codes. **
**Damping Ring e-cloud simulation started..**
**Crab Cavity simulation started. **
- Plans for FY07: Studying
**Purse dynamical aspect of LET in Main Linac, with increasing realism. **
**Study in more detail Crab cavity performance **
**E-Cloud problem. **
# Presentation: 168575

## China: Five Years and Beyond in Space

- Space is the “focal point for advanced Science and Technology”
- Drives economic development and military power
-  Outer Space is the “top of the food chain” in warfare – The High Ground
- Winning in space is key to the future

**Notes:**
Dai Xu, Huanqui Shibao, December 21, 2006

## Future Commercial Programs

- Earth Observation Services
- 		Met			Resources
- 		Ocean 		Environmental
- Space Launch Services
- Communications
- Ground equipment/Stations
- Geo-Stationary and Near Earth

## The PLA’s Approach to Warfare

- Five Domains of War are integrated
- Land
- Sea (Undersea)
- Air
- Electromagnetic Spectrum / Information
- Space  (high ground – must capture)

**Notes:**
Warfare is integrated, a capable nation must be able to fight in all domains

## Key Issues for the People’s Liberation Army

- Sovereignty in space
- Offensive and Defensive activities in space
- How space supremacy relates to information warfare
- Military use of civilian satellites
- How to apply the Laws of War

## Sovereignty Debate

- How high is territorial airspace?
- What activities are permitted?
- Military reconnaissance = “Battlefield Preparation”
- Global strike and outer space
- Foreign observation of China

**Notes:**
“Freedom of navigation in the EEZ does not include the freedom to conduct military and reconnaissance activities”

## The Laws of War Apply

- Use of civilian space craft by a belligerent power means attack is OK
- Common space like common seas and skies
- Space craft, satellites, stations, etc of a belligerent are acceptable targets in war anywhere in common space

## Space Warfare Programs

- Direct ascent KKV
- Laser Blinding
- Jamming
- Microsat/Parasite - Jam or Collide
- MMW
- Upper atmosphere fighter (up or down)

## Space Warfare Programs (Cont)

- Space Deterrence
- Aircraft as launch platform
- Space-to-ground attack
- CNA on space control

## Chinese Intelligence and Security Services or Collectors

- Ministry of State Security
- Local and regional security bureaus
- Ministry of Public Security
- PLA Second Department (Intel)
- PLA Third Department (EW/SIGINT)
- PLA Fourth Department (IW)
- General Armaments Department

## Intel services/collectors (cont.)

- General Logistics Department
- Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense
- General Political Department (Liaison Department)
- Communist Party Liaison Department
- Industries/State Companies and their reps
# Presentation: 682113

## Aviation Charter King Air A100, N41BE

- Eveleth, Minnesota
- October 25, 2002

- National Transportation Safety Board

- Eveleth, Minnesota
- October 25, 2002

## Eveleth

- St Paul

## 1001:08

## 1006:49

- ATC – “King Air one bravo echo what do you intend to do in the event of a missed approach at Eveleth”
- N41BE – “well let’s hope we don’t have that if we ah do have a missed approach we’ll go up and circle and figure this out I’ll hold at the VOR”
- ATC – “King Air one bravo echo roger”

## 1009:17

## 1012:16

## Slide 7

## EVM

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

-   VOR Runway 27 Final Approach Course

## 1018:13

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 3,500 FT 174 KCAS

## 1018:13

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- ATC – “King Air one bravo echo is one zero miles from the VOR turn left heading three zero zero maintain three thousand five hundred till established on the final approach course cleared for the VOR runway two seven approach Eveleth”

- 3,500 FT 174 KCAS

## 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- N41BE – “Left three hundred on the heading and thirty five hundred till established cleared for the VOR runway two seven approach at Eveleth ah four one bravo echo”

- 1018:31

- 3,500 FT 164 KCAS

## 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 1018:42

- 3,500 FT 160 KCAS

## 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 1018:54

- 3,500 FT 157 KCAS

## 10 Mile

- EVM

- ATC – “King Air one bravo echo change to advisory frequency approved advise cancellation of IFR with Princeton Flight Service when on the ground”

- 1019:12

- 3,500 FT 157 KCAS

- 5 Mile

## 10 Mile

- EVM

- N41BE – “Roger that we’ll contact Princeton on the ground four one bravo echo good day”

- ATC – “Good day”

- 1019:20

- 5 Mile

## 1019:30

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 3,400 FT 165 KCAS

## 1019:42

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 3,300 FT 170 KCAS

## 1019:54

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 3,000 FT 171 KCAS

## 1020:06

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 2,700 FT 170 KCAS

## 1020:18

- 10 Mile

- 5 Mile

- EVM

- 2,500 FT 167 KCAS

## 1020:30

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 5 Mile

- 2,200 FT 158 KCAS

## 1020:42

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 2,100 FT 145 KCAS

- 5 Mile

## 1020:54

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 2,100 FT 129 KCAS

- 5 Mile

## 1021:06

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 2,000 FT 116 KCAS

## 1021:18

- 5 Mile

- 10 Mile

- EVM

- 1,900 FT 103 KCAS

## 1021:30

- 10 Mile

- 5 Mile

- 1,800 FT 87 KCAS

- EVM

- 10 Mile

- 1021:42

- 5 Mile

- 1,800 FT 76 KCAS

- EVM

## EVM

- 10 Mile

- 5 Mile

- X

- Crash Site

- National Transportation Safety Board
**Aviation Charter King Air A100, N41BE**
# Presentation: 841662

## Status of BPM Upgrade

- Rob Kutschke
- Tevatron Department Meeting
- August 20, 2004

## Prototype System in A3 

- Installed on HA34 and VA35.
- Uses evaluation board from Echotek.
- Uses new DAQ front end and updated online software.
- Has been working and logging data to Lumberjack since last week.
- Anti-proton data has been meaningful (semi-calibrated) since August 13 at about 5 PM.
- Not yet logging to SDA database.
- Except for SDA this is an end to end test.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Beams-doc-1310

- _[Beams-doc-1310](http://beamdocs.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1310)_

- From TevSA (15 Hz)

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Resolution over 11 minutes.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## All 3mm      full scale.

- Proton HA34

- Pbar HA34

- Proton VA35

- Pbar VA35

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Notes

- V Resolution better than H resolution.
- Also seen with Recycler Echotek VA14/HA15.
- I presume that this is due to real beam motion.
- The system can see lots of motion at the few hundred micron level over the course of a few hours.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Subtraction of proton from pbar has time dependent calibration.

- Studying options to improve current algorithms.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Mike Martens’ Bump Study

- There are some bumps in the tune-up procedures whose purpose is to test for working BPMs.
- The new BPMs see these bumps.
- Measured magnitude agrees within the error on the prediction O(10%).
- Need to fix a sign error in our code.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Work in Progress

- There are some outliers in online data that are not in the offline data.
- Data does not have the expected phase structure.
- Not yet understood.  Could be a real board problem or just firmware.  Working with the vendor.
- Need improved algorithms for canceling the proton contamination on the pbar cables.
- Working on turn by turn and first turn modes.
- Have not yet demonstrated short gate mode with the new system.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Work in Progress

- Working to understand how the Grey chip in the Echotek is programmed.  Can we improve it?
- Expect second set of evaluation boards today.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Backup Slides

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Proton Data

- Ignore anti-proton contamination on the proton cables.  Proton position and intensity given by:

- Position is in mm.  Intensity is also known as “sum”.
- Here A and B are complex numbers (IA,QA) an (IB,QB) computed by the Echotek board.
- Units of A and B are “Echotek Units”.
- Sum signal depends on energy of the Tevatron.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004

## Anti-Proton Data

- Must cancel the proton contamination on the anti-proton cables:

- a,b,c,d are complex constants
- For now they are determined offline.
- They may vary from BPM to BPM and from store to store.
- We are working on more robust algorithms to remove this contamination.
- Position and intensity then given by the previous formulae, using the calibrated values of A and B.

- Rob Kutschke, BPMs

- 8/20/2004
# Presentation: 254493

## Fire WarriorMicro Thermal Imaging CameraA Total Fire Group Product

**Utilizing US Military Research and Development Technology**

## Smallest, lightest camera available (approx 3”x3”x3”.) 
Weighs approximately 18 ounces.
Uses two (2) ‘AA’ batteries.
No expensive, proprietary battery to charge, no battery memory.
Approx. 3 hours of useable battery life.
No vehicle charger needed.

- Smallest, lightest camera available (approx 3”x3”x3”.)
- Weighs approximately 18 ounces.
- Uses two (2) ‘AA’ batteries.
- No expensive, proprietary battery to charge, no battery memory.
- Approx. 3 hours of useable battery life.
- No vehicle charger needed.

## Empowers firefighter, rescuer, or miner to use both hands
Usually 1 person is assigned hand held thermal imaging camera.
With the Fire Warrior, that person with the camera can also assist in suppression or rescue.
Rapid Intervention Rescue time has been significantly reduced.

- Empowers firefighter, rescuer, or miner to use both hands
- Usually 1 person is assigned hand held thermal imaging camera.
- With the Fire Warrior, that person with the camera can also assist in suppression or rescue.
- Rapid Intervention Rescue time has been _***significantly***_ reduced.

## OLED display technology enhances image for highest quality.
OLED display is designed for up-close viewing, therefore eliminating smoke interference as well as having to raise the camera to your eyes.
On screen digital temperature display.

- OLED display technology enhances image for highest quality.
- OLED display is designed for up-close viewing, therefore eliminating smoke interference as well as having to raise the camera to your eyes.
- On screen digital temperature display.

## Fire Warrior
18 ounces
Hands free
Most current engine for micro camera using amorphous silicon (ASi) technology 
User can multi-task, reducing damage control team manpower requirements and exposure.
**Check with local dealer for pricing

- Fire Warrior
- 18 ounces
- Hands free
- Most current engine for micro camera using amorphous silicon (ASi) technology
- User can multi-task, reducing damage control team manpower requirements and exposure.
- **Check with local dealer for pricing

- Typical Thermal Imaging Camera
- Over 4 pounds.
- Hand held unit.
- Uses older, heavier, outdated technology.
- User is dedicated to TIC only.
- Uses rechargeable batteries that gain “battery memory” over time.
# Presentation: 154997

## Narrow Gap Semiconductor Structures for Electronic Device Applications

- The explosion of interest in graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms, has called attention to the advantages of materials with small effective masses.  In our InSb quantum wells, the electron effective mass is as small as in graphene while the room-temperature mobility (~40,000 cm2/Vs) is more than a factor of two larger.  We are studying electronic device applications that exploit high mobility.  These include traditional devices (field-effect transistors, magnetic field sensors) and devices that take advantage of quantum-mechanical or spin-orbit effects.  We are also exploring the properties of holes in InSb quantum wells, which are predicted to have stronger spin-orbit effects than electrons and would be required for CMOS logic applications.

- The absorption of far infrared radiation by an InSb quantum well depends on the photon energy and applied magnetic field.  The rich absorption spectra reflect the small effective masses and strong spin splittings for both electrons and holes.

**Narrow Gap Semiconductor Structures for Electronic Device Applications**

**MRSEC**

**Notes:**
Aim of the project:
     The demand for higher speed operation, denser memory, and increased functionality of semiconductor technologies has motivated research on nanoscale electronic devices that exploit quantum mechanical and spin effects.  Semiconductors with narrow bandgaps have several attributes that are highly desirable for nanoscale devices such as high mobility, small effective masses, and large spin splitting.  Such attributes imply higher operating temperatures for ballistic transport devices, stronger quantum confinement for low dimensional devices and greater sensitivity of magnetic field sensors.  Moreover, enhanced spin effects provide an additional opportunity for spintronic devices which may provide new routes for computation and data storage.  We are capitalizing on our previously demonstrated successes in growth, device fabrication, optical, transport, and theoretical studies of narrow gap materials for enhanced understanding of both the fundamental physics and novel technologies that these materials can yield.
# Presentation: 169077

## The U.S. Department of Homeland Security

- CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT

## VISION

- “The United States will forge an unprecedented level of cooperation throughout all levels of government, with private industry and institutions, and with the American people to protect our critical infrastructure and key assets from terrorist attack.”
- The National Strategy for Homeland Security

## CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

- Lead the coordinated national effort to reduce the risk to our critical infrastructures and key resources posed by acts of terrorism, as well as enable national preparedness, timely response and rapid recovery in the event of an attack, natural disaster or other emergency.

## DIVISION STRUCTURE

- Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center
- Risk Management
- Contingency Planning and Support
- Infrastructure Partnerships
- Chemical and Nuclear Preparedness ad Protection

## National Infrastructure Protection Plan

- Defines a risk management framework
- Emphasizes coordination with Federal, State, Territorial, tribal, local and private sector security partners
- Establishes a ‘steady-state’ of security across critical infrastructure/key resource sectors
- Enables critical infrastructure protection planning activities and resource allocation decisions
- Describes linkages to the National Response Plan protocols in the event of an Incident of National Significance

## CIP SECTORS

- Agriculture
- Banking and Finance
- Chemical and Hazmats
- Defense Industrial Base
- Emergency Services
- Energy
- Food
- Government

- Information Technology and Telecommunications
- Postal and Shipping
- Public Health and Health Care
- Transportation
- Drinking Water and Water Treatment Systems

## Slide 7

## Emergency Management

- FEMA
- Response, Recovery, Mitigation
- Urban Search and Rescue
- Emergency Management Institute
- Preparedness Division
- Exercises—all hazard

## Exercises

- Risk based, scenario
- State, local, tribal
- TOP OFFICIALS -- TOPOFF

## Urban Areas Security Initiative

- DHS is providing $765 million in direct funding for high threat urban areas as part of the fiscal year 2006 Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI).  UASI provides resources for the unique equipment, training, planning, and exercise needs of select high threat urban areas.

## Risk Formula

- Consequence, vulnerability, threat
- Factors:  presence of international borders; population and population density; location of CI; mutual aid cooperation; law enforcement investigations and enforcement activity

## Slide 12
# Presentation: 862798

## CDF Analysis Diskpool Status	

- Dave Ambrose, Doug Benjamin and Alexei Varganov

-  Example of CDF needs
-  Use Case analysis
- Analysis of Billing and door DB’s
-  System  tests
-  fileserver rate tests
- Pnfs database rate tests
-  Plans

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## Examples of CDF needs

- Rootd fileservers
- CDF currently is using 69 rootd fileservers
- 51 must retire before Dec 06 (> 4 years old)
- Space inefficiently used (stale data)
- Can not easily manage the space
- Large Scratch space for physics group work
- Top group in process of making TopNtuples for Summer ‘06 analysis
- Need temp. buffer space for output before merging and writing to tape.
- Using partition in large fileserver (inefficient use of space- one partition filled up and output lost - need to rerun some sections) Analysis pool would have helped here

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## Daily diskpool usage 

- D. Ambrose

- 10

- 0

- 0

- 20

- 100

- 1

- 100

- 104

- 105

- 101

- 103

- 104

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## jobs by user (Total/write/read)

- D. Ambrose

- 105

- 100

- 100

- 104

- 100

- 105

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## Example user profile

- Most prolific user
- Reading only
- ntuples

- D Ambrose

- 106

- 105

- 100

- 102

- 101

- 106

- 106

- 103

- 100

- 105

- 100

- 100

- 105

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

- Most prolific writer
- Writing ntuples
- Reading ntuples

- D Ambrose

- 103

- 104

- 104

- 105

- 100

- 105

- 102

- 100

- 104

- 100

- 100

- 104

- 100

- 104

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## System testing

- Fileserver read performance
- By server
- Agregate rate

- A Varganov

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## Various fileservers

- 30 jobs

- 100 jobs

- 120 MB/s

- 0 MB/s

- 0 MB/s

- 120 MB/s

- A Varganov

- D Ambrose

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## PNFS  bandwidth testing

- Used both dCache prestage command and root Tfile open to make measurements.
- Found response linear up to ~ 500 simultaneous clients ~ 0.1 secs per Tfile open
- dCache Doors (currently only 13) saturated during test
**Automatically recovered** when test finished

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006

## Plans

- Summarize user use case profiles next week (interviewed 10 users )
- Plan for first formal preproduction readiness review week within one month
- Starting to write formal review charge in conjunction with Spokespersons/ Offline heads
- Determine committee membership

- CDF Analysis diskpool status - D Benjamin

- GDM May 9 2006
# Presentation: 222017

## PHILIP BLOOR

**PHILIP BLOOR**

## Primary Regulations

**Section 36 of Electricity Act 1989  -****	**BERR

**EIA Requirement – Electricity works (Environmental Impact Assessment) regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1927)**

**Section 5 Food and Environment Protection Act (FEPA) 1985  -  **Defra

## ENERGY ATLAS     water depth

- ENERGY ATLAS     water depth

## ENERGY ATLAS     wind power

- ENERGY ATLAS     wind power

## ROUND 1

- Crown Estate Issued Round 1 Licenses in 2001

- 18 Companies obtained licenses

- Demonstration Round

- Area of seabed limited to 10 km2

- Water depths of less than 20 metres

- All within 12 km from shore

- A maximum of 30 Turbines

**ROUND 1**

## ROUND 2

**ROUND 2**

- 2003 Crown Estate announces second round

- 27 GW of installed capacity

- Licence condition for two years of site specific bird data

- Further offshore

- Much larger than Round 1 sites

- Strategic Environmental Assessment Undertaken

- 3 Strategic Areas Selected

## Pre-consent Bird Data

- Boat Based Data
- Aerial Bird Data
**BOTH** required for different species

## Aerial Bird Surveys

**SOLUTION**
- Joint Government/Industry Aerial Bird Survey Programme
- 2004 – 2007
- Managed by BERR

- Industry require data for EIAs
- Government require data for SPAs and SEA
- Shortage of resources

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Common Scoter

- January - February 2005

## Common Scoter

- January – February 2006

## Research

- Research Advisory Group (RAG)
- _[http://www3.dti.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/policy/offshore/research-advisory/](http://www3.dti.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/policy/offshore/research-advisory/)_
- Collaborative Offshore Wind Research into the Environment (COWRIE)
- _[http://www.offshorewindfarms.co.uk/](http://www.offshorewindfarms.co.uk/)_

## Projects

## Research Projects

- Predicting the displacement of common scoter from benthic feeding areas.
- Energetic costs of flight in birds
- Investigation into Best Practice Guidance for the Use of Remote Techniques for Observing Bird Behaviour in Relation to Offshore Wind Farms

## Potential use of population viability analysis 

**Potential use of population viability analysis **
**to assess the impact of offshore wind **
**farms on bird populations**

## Use of aerial surveys to 

- Use of aerial surveys to
- detect bird displacement
- by offshore wind farms

-    Use of runs of data over a number of years
-    Include fixed environmental data, e.g. bathymetry
-    Use Generalised Linear Modelling

## Red-throated diver

## Monitoring

- FEPA Conditions are:

- Flexible

- Site specific

## Examples of conditions

- One year pre-construction monitoring
- Two years of post construction monitoring
- Avoidance of construction during peak periods of sensitivity
- Use of radar
- Two phased construction

## PHILIP BLOOR

**THANK YOU**
# Presentation: 116375

## Nuclear Reactors in 

**Nature: The Oklo Phenomenon **

- Carolyn Bauer
- SUNY Oneonta
- July 27, 2006

## Fission

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## How do we know that Oklo was the site of a natural nuclear reactor?

- Ratios of U-235 to U-238
- Fission Products

## Abundances of U-235

- Accepted Isotopic concentration= 0.7202%
- Isotopic concentrations found at Oklo= as low as 0.440%

## Fission Products 

- Differences in Isotopic Concentrations of
- Neodymium
- Ruthenium
- Elevation in isotopic concentrations
- 	of U-235
- Existence of Plutonium

## Decay Scheme for U-238 to U-235

**238****U + n ******** ****239****U ******** ****239****Np +β****-**** ******** ****239****Pu + β****-******** ****235****U +α**

## 3 Basic conditions necessary for a reactor to work:

- Ore with a high Uranium content
- Uranium must be at least 	3% U-235
- Existence of a moderator

## Isotopic 

- Isotopic
- compositon
- of U-235
- Today

- Isotopic
- compositon
- of U-235
- 2 billion
- years agon

## Moderator

- Close in size to a neutron
- Slows down neutrons so fission can occur
- Prevent meltdown
- At Oklo water was the moderator

## Implications

- Geological information pertaining to containment
- Implications for improvement of repositories like Yucca Mountain

## Nature trumps man 

- 100% of the time
# Presentation: 539364

## Translation of TCGA data

- Lynda Chin, MDDana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School

## TCGA GBM program: summary

- Defining the atlas of changes in human GBM
- Deeper insights into known mutations
- Many novel gene candidates identified
- Cross-platform validation & interpretation of alterations
- Distinct molecular subtypes of primary GBM defined
- Potential implication for patient stratification
- New technology for sequencing
- More data, better data, lower cost...
- New ways of looking at cancer genomes

## Integration and Synergy

- Chin and Gray, *Nature*, in press

## An example...

- 66 kinases identified be required for cell viability in two GBM cell lines by
- (Bill Hahn, DFCI/Broad)

- 77 genes expressed in SVZ in mouse brain during development
- (GENSAT Brain Atlas)

- Regions of Amplification in TCGA GBM samples
- (n=106)

- 5 genes  CDK6

## CDK6, not CDK4, is the major CDK that complexes with p16INK4A or p18INK4C on co-IP
p18INK4C loss-of-function mutants do not bind to CDK6

p18INK4C is a backup tumor suppressor engaged in the relatively common setting of p16INK4A inactivation
Loss of p16INK4A  enhanced proliferation  increased E2F1
E2F1 binding to p18INK4C promoter  induction of backup

- p18INK4C loss-of-function mutants do not bind to CDK6
- p18INK4C is a backup tumor suppressor engaged in the relatively common setting of p16INK4A inactivation
- Loss of p16INK4A  enhanced proliferation  increased E2F1
- E2F1 binding to p18INK4C promoter  induction of backup

- Wiedemeyer, Brennan, et al, *Cancer Cell*,  in press

- CDK6 and p18INK4C in GBM

## Integration and Triangulation

- Chin and Gray, *Nature*, in press
# Presentation: 051945

## MNM Fatal 2004-21

- Electrical
- October 16, 2004 (Missouri)
- Crushed Stone Operation
- Laborer
- 37 years old
- 6 months experience

## Overview

- A 4-man crew was positioning a conveyor utilizing a rubber-tired crane. The victim had both hands on the end of the conveyor. He was electrocuted when the crane hoist cable contacted a high-voltage power line.

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Why Did Accident Occur?

- The accident occurred because safe operating procedures were not implemented before operating the crane near an energized high-voltage power line.  The power line was not de-energized and no other precautionary measures were taken.  A risk assessment to identify all possible hazards and establish safe procedures was not conducted by the crew prior to starting this task.

## Slide 6

## Causal Factors

- Management policies and controls were inadequate.  Safe work procedures were not initiated to ensure that miners were protected while working near energized high-voltage power lines.

## Causal Factors

- Policies and administrative controls were inadequate and failed to assign a ground person to signal the crane operator during all phases of the lift.  The crane operator was unable to observe the distance between the hoist cable and the power line.

## Best Practices

- Before the work begins, miners should jointly discuss the job tasks, identify all possible hazards, and ensure that steps are taken to safely perform the task (risk analysis).
- Ensure that high-voltage power lines are de-energized before operating equipment within 10 feet of them.
- Ensure that someone on the ground is designated to give signals to the crane operator making the lift.

## Best Practices

- Train all miners to recognize hazards associated with crane lifting and ensure that tag lines are attached to guide the load.
- Ensure that miners are in a safe location prior to lifting the load.
# Presentation: 334738

## Land Navigation for Ground Team Members

- Developed as part of the National Emergency Services Curriculum Project

## Orienteering Compass

**Notes:**
Orienteering compasses tend to be popular for hikers, mainly because they are fairly cheap and easy to use.

## Lensatic Compass

## Centerhold Technique

## Compass-to-Cheek Technique

##  Pace Count 

- The number of paces it takes you to cover 100 meters
- Varies depending on a variety of things
- Slopes
- Weather Conditions or Elements, including visibility
- Surfaces
- Clothing and Equipment

## Pace Count Continued

- Determining Pace Count
- Walk a MEASURED 100 meter course and record your pace count
- Walk the Return of that 100 meter course and record your pace count
- Add the two together, and divide the sum by two to get your average pace count on that terrain

_**Work the Math**_
- 1st Leg		**121**
- Return Leg	_**119**_
- Sum		**240 **/ 2
- Average Pace
-   100 Meters

**120**

## Pace Count Continued

- Calculating a distance to travel is simply a matter of basic math
- For example, to walk 250 meters using the previous pace count of 120 paces takes 300 paces
-   120 paces (100 meters)
-   120 paces (100 meters)
- _+  60 paces (50 meters is 1/2 of 100 meters)_
- 300 paces (250 meters)

## Pace Count Continued

- Keep track of the paces you have walked in the field.  It is too easy to forget and be off course.  Try using some of the following.  For every 100 meters try
- Move a bead on your pace counter
- Place a mark in a notebook
- Tie a knot in a string
- Put a pebble in your pocket

## Navigating Past An Obstacle

- Basically makes a box around the obstacle
- Accuracy counts, especially around larger obstacles
- A graphical presentation is made of this on the next slide

## Slide 11

## Land Navigation Tasks for Ground Team Members

- O-0201: Use a Compass
- O-0202: Measure Distance with Pace Count
- O-0203: Navigate Past an Obstacle
# Presentation: 210368

## NSLS-II Frontends and Canted Wigglers Options

**Sushil Sharma**

## Schematic Layout of a Cell

**ID and BM Frontends**

- Configuration without a Frontend

- Exit
- Port

- Beam

## Typical NSLS-II Frontend

**Only one fixed mask and one photon shutter are used in a frontend.**
**The BM photon shutter before the slow gate valve eliminates the need for another slow gate valve in the frontend.**

*BM Photon*
*Shutter*

## Frontend Components

- Lead Collimator

- Photon shutter

- Safety shutters

- XBPM

##  Front end – Thermal Analysis

-  **Front end – Thermal Analysis**

- For the front-end components the calculated temperature is ~ 430 oC  a thermal fatigue life of greater than 10,000 cycles.

**Glidcop**

- 7.4 m

- 0.5 m

##  Canted Wigglers Option

**Typical Chamber Cross-Section**

**Dipole Chamber - 1**

-  Canted Wigglers Option

- 10.3 m

##  Canted Wigglers Option – contd.

- Two bellows assemblies (inboard and outboard) are preferable considering beam impedance, cost  and schedule.
- Hardware or “crotch” between the two bellows assemblies must be protected by a crotch absorber.

- Wiggler Absorber

- Crotch Absorber

-  Canted Wigglers Option – contd.

##  Canted Wigglers Option – contd.

-  Canted Wigglers Option – contd.

- The wiggler(s) fan is limited to  ~ 6 mrad, which is trimmed to ~ 4 mrad by the wiggler absorber, in order to get the fan out to the frontend. A significantly larger fan will require extensive modifications of the chambers, absorbers and magnets.
- The new wigglers with a fan of ± 2.3 mrad can be canted to ~ 2 mrad.

- Fans of New Canted Wigglers at 10 m

## SR Absorbers – Thermal Analyses

- The crotch absorber intercepts 814 W at a normal peak power density of 0.25kW/mm2. A maximum temperature of 105 oC is calculated.
- The total intercepted power by the wiggler absorber is 11 kW out of 65 kW. This results in a maximum temperature of 427 oC. A fatigue life of > 10,000 cycles is expected.

- Crotch Absorber

- Wiggler Absorber

## Magnet Modifications for Exit ports

- APS Exit Port

- Wiggler Absorber

- Exit Port

- NSLS-II Wiggler Exit Port

## Summary:

- Preliminary design and analysis of the ID, wiggler and BM frontends are in progress.
- Wiggler(s) radiation fan must be limited to approximately ± 3 mrad in order to use the standard aluminum extrusions, absorbers, exit ports and associated magnets.
- Wigglers with a fan of  approximately ± 2.3 mrad fan can be canted to ~ 2 mrad.
# Presentation: 215663

## Proton Plan

- Eric Prebys
- FNAL Accelerator Division

## Timeline

- Startup Milestones:
- October 13: Beam through linac
- October 22: Beam to Booster dump
- November 2: 5E12@80% efficiency
- This was our trigger to begin studies

## Studies – 11/1-11/7

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

-   Mon        Tue         Wed        Thu          Fri            Sat        Sun

- Owl
- Day
- Eve

- RF Studies

- Operators Tune

- 400 MeV

- Lattice Meas

- Linac coll

## Studies – 11/8-11/15

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

-   Mon        Tue         Wed        Thu          Fri            Sat        Sun

- Owl
- Day
- Eve

- DC Studies

- 6 GeV Running

## Studies – 11/16-11/23

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

-   Mon        Tue         Wed        Thu          Fri            Sat        Sun

- Owl
- Day
- Eve

- RF 19 Commissioning

- Tuning + Collimators

- Misc. studies
# Presentation: 252033

## CONCLUSIONS  (from submitted paper)  

**The southern rim of the Isidis Basin (Libya Montes) has been strongly modified by fluvial erosional processes, including weathering, mass wasting, fluvial incision, and transport and deposition of sediment.  **
**Most of this erosion occurred during the Noachian, but a late stage of fluvial incision probably extended into the Hesperian.  **

**Geomorphic Analysis of the Libya Montes Region: Implications for Geology of Isidis Landing Ellipse** Jeff Moore (NASA Ames) & Alan Howard (Uva)

## CONCLUSIONS (Continued) 

**Flat upland plateaus remained largely undissected, but the steeper margins of the plateaus, as well as interior and exterior crater rims, were deeply eroded, with sediments accumulating as fans, bajadas, and, possibly, playa lake deposits within crater interiors and in inter-crater basins. **
**Late in the Noachian the steeper fans systems became dissected, presumably as a result in a decrease in sediment shed from uplands or an increase in runoff.  **
**During the latest Noachian to early Hesperian, further clear water discharges created an integrated set of valleys incised into the earlier basin deposits.  **
**Discharge for the late stage dissection was probably from precipitation runoff rather than groundwater sapping.**

## Missing Image

## Slide 4

## IMPLICATIONS FOR LANDING ELLIPSE 

**Lot of fluvial erosion in Libya Montes, with many channels heading toward Isidis Planitia.  None of the channels we studied cut Isidis itself.  Unambiguously fluvial channels were unobserved below -2700 m elevation.**
**MOLA topography shows several indistinct ramps that slope down into the southern edge of the ellipse from the Libya Montes that might be alluvial fans, though this interpretation is problematical.**
**Most of the ellipse is dominated by a unit that is superposed (with a sharp contact) on the “fans” that is clearly seen in THEMIS mid-IR images and appears to be associated with “Thumbprint” terrain.  This material appears similar to that which will be sampled by *****Beagle 2*****.  We infer no obvious relationship of this “Thumbprint” terrain material with Libya Montes fluvial deposition.**
# Presentation: 804756

## P bar lifetime at injection12/03/2002(fitted lifetimes on p and pbar helix, lifetime vs aperture,emittance from scraping)

- T. Sen, V. Shiltsev, X. Zhang,
- F. Zimmermann, P. Ivanov, P. Lebrun

## fitted lifetimes (3 models

|  | over 10 minutes | over  40 minutes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| P helix | e=2.5 hr
1/2=1.0 hr
e-sqrt=2.7 hr
=5.4 hr | e=5.3 hr
1/2=1.9 hr
e-sqrt=6.4 hr
=14.3 hr |
| Pbar helix
 | e=3.1 hr
1/2=1.3 hr
e-sqrt=2.8 | e=7.8 hr
1/2=3.1 hr
e-sqrt=6.7 hr |

## get =1.8 mm from which 6~72  mm mrad (~43 m)

- get =1.8 mm from which 6~72  mm mrad (~43 m)

**FW: ~21 ******** mm** **mrad**

- and yet another attempt (this time 1 p bunch 150 GeV)

- huge discrepancy, probably we didn’t scrape enough?
# Presentation: 715652

## By: 

**AU: Mercury**
**(our final frontier)**

- By:
- Mark
- and
- Sam

**4/15/04**

## Currently the AU in use today is 93,000,000 miles (distance from Sun to Earth).  We believe that we have discovered an easier to use  AU.  Our mission is to introduce our new and improved AU.  We will also bring up disadvantages and advantages.

**Currently the AU in use today is 93,000,000 miles (distance from Sun to Earth).  We believe that we have discovered an easier to use*****  *****AU.  Our mission is to introduce our new and improved AU.  We will also bring up disadvantages and advantages.**

## We chose Mercury for a baseline AU because we knew that it was closest to the sun.  Therefore all other distances would be more than one.

**To find the distance in AU for other planets beside Mercury we divided the other planets distance from the sun by Mercury’s distance from the sun. **

## Facts:

| Planet | Distance (Km) | Distance (AU) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mercury | 57,909,175 | 1~1 |
| Venus | 108,208,930 | 1.87~2 |
| Earth | 149,597,890 | 2.58~3 |
| Mars | 227,936,640 | 3.94~4 |
| Jupiter | 778,412,010 | 13.44~13 |
| Saturn | 1,426,725,400 | 24.64~25 |
| Uranus | 2,870,972,200 | 49.58~50 |
| Neptune | 4,498,252,900 | 77.68~78 |
| Pluto | 5,905,376,200 | 101.98~102 |

## Because Mercury is the closest to the Sun, there are no fractions of one AU.

**Because Mercury is the closest to the Sun, there are no fractions of one AU.**
**AUs are approximately a multiple or factor of 25.**
**All AUs are user friendly.**
**AUs are easy to find for all of the planets. **

## AU’s are relatively large numbers.

**AU’s are relatively large numbers.**
**Scientists worldwide would have to rewrite equations, textbooks, etc. **

## We believe that Mercury as a baseline for an AU far surpasses the usefulness of the Earth baseline AU.

**We believe that Mercury as a baseline for an AU far surpasses the usefulness of the Earth baseline AU.**

**Image of Mercury found at ****http://www.rrtearoom.com/...e/A87436/Mercury.jpg**
**This has been a Mallagher Production......**
# Presentation: 035509

## Pregnant Woman

- By:  Aimee B.
- 		and
-        Brittany W.

**Who:** Young Woman
**Age:**  27 years old
**Height:**  5 ft. 9 in.
**Weight:**  125 lb.
**Energy Level:**  Medium
**Total Daily Caloric Intake Needed:**  2350 cal

## Basic Information	

**A healthy diet is important because everything she eats and drinks affects her baby’s development.**
**An increased daily serving of proteins and dairy products is needed during this time.**
**She may also need to eat smaller meals more often instead of three larger ones.**

## Basic Information continued

**Fluids are important to help maintain proper body temperature, to transport nutrients, and most importantly to cushion and protect the baby.**

## Servings

**3 servings of high protein foods**
**3-4 servings of dairy products**
**3-5 vegetables**
**2 servings of vitamin C-rich foods**
**8 cups of fluids**

## Breakfast

**1 cup of orange juice, 105 cal**
**1 cup of milk, 120 cal**
**2 eggs, 154 cal**
**2 slices of toast, 140 cal or 1 bagel, 195 cal**
**1 choice of fruit, 100 cal**
**Total calories = 619 cal or 674 cal**

## Lunch

**1 cup of milk, 120 cal**
**1 cup of juice, 105 cal**
**1 tuna or chicken sandwich on 2 slices of wheat bread with celery and onion, 184 cal**
**Carrot sticks , 35 cal**
**1 piece of fruit, 80 cal**
**Total calories = 524 cal**

## Dinner	

**1 cup of milk, 120 cal**
**Roasted chicken or cooked fresh fish, **
**   ****193 cal**
**2 vegetables, 130 cal**
**1 cup of cooked pasta, 200 cal**
**1 small roll, 70 cal**
**Total Calories = 713 calories**

## Snacks – 3 times a day

-             Choices
- Carrot sticks with 2 tbsp. of dip
- Graham crackers, 8 small squares
- Yogurt, with fruit (1 cup)
- Pretzel snack mix
- Citrus fruits
- Nuts
**Approximately 500 cal**

## FLUIDS

**DRINK AT LEAST 8 CUPS OF WATER A DAY!!!!!**

## Exercise	

**Stretching**
**20 minute walk at a leisure or brisk pace-depending, once or twice a day**
**Low-impact aerobics 30 – 45 minutes, 3-5 times a week**

## Good Stretching Tips!

**Overhead Press** – both arms push up to meet overhead from about shoulder level.  Repeat
**Shoulder Raise** – With arms down by side, raise shoulder level then return to sides.  Repeat.
**Chest Crossover** – Hold arms at shoulder level with elbows slightly bent.  Bring arms together in front of your body, crossing forearms over the other.  Repeat.
**Seated Leg Lift** – Sit down, bend legs, slowly bring legs up and straighten.

## Daily Schedule

- Breakfast
- Light Stretching (Use the Stretch Plan)
- 20 minute walk
- Snack
- Work around the house
- Lunch
- Low-impact aerobics
- Snack
- Work around the house
- Dinner
- 20 minute walk
- Snack
- Good night’s sleep