BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 532052

## Adjustment of breeding values for past and future inbreeding

**Paul VanRaden*****, Lori Smith **
**Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory**
**Agricultural Research Service, USDA**
**Beltsville,  Maryland**

## Selection and Mating

**Selection**
**Rank animals from best to worst**
**Decide which animals reproduce**
**Mating**
**Predict the merit of pairs**
**Decide which animals are paired**
**Select/Mate**
**Do both steps at once**
**Better in theory but not practical**

## Main effects and interactions

**Transmitting ability**
**Mean value of progeny of random mates**
**Falconer**
**Nonadditive merit**
**Parents’ combined value minus parent average**
**Inbreeding depression**
**Best Transmitting Ability**
**Value of progeny of least related mates**
**Value of genes in later generations**

## Past and future inbreeding

**Past inbreeding**
**   ****adjusted yield = yield - ********(inbreeding)**
**Future inbreeding**
**   ****adjusted PTA****       = PTA + ******** (expected inbreeding)**
**   ****combined merit****  = PTA****S**** + PTA****D**** + ******** (inbreeding****S,D****)**
**   ****PTA****S**** and PTA****D**** are adjusted for past inbreeding**
**Mating programs**

## Test of adjustments

**Mate population**
**600 females born in 1996**
**Data file**
**All Holsteins evaluated August 1998**
**Regressions**
**Previously estimated by Wiggans et al. (1995)**
**Timing**
**4 hours for expected inbreeding; 0 for evaluation**

## PTA Correlations

**	**_**	**__**	**_**  ****None****	****   Past****	****Past, Future**
**None****	****	****1.0000****	****  .9974****	****      .9976**
**Past****	****	****	****  .9974****	****1.0000****	****      .9976**
**Past, Future****	****  .9976****	****  .9976****	****    1.0000**

**Adjustments**

**From 584 active AI bulls**

## Value of adjustment

**Current progress    = $200 million/yr**
**Increased progress = 100/(1-.9976) = .24%**
**Yearly benefit         = $.5 million/yr**
**Net present value   = $10 million/yr**

## Genetic Trend

_**Cows born 1980-1990**_**	****      **_**kg/year**_
**Published trend****	****	****	****104.4**
**Additive trend****	****	****	****107.4**
**Additive - inbreeding loss****	****  98.2**

## Interbull

**Ideal**
**Each country adjusts for past inbreeding**
**Do across-country evaluation (MACE)**
**Add future inbreeding within country**
**Proposed**
**USA adjusts for past and future inbreeding**
**MACE accounts for change in trend**
**Alternative**
**Adjust only the Net Merit index**

## Conclusions

**Additive and nonadditive effects can be separated**
**PTAs may include expected nonadditive (expected inbreeding ******** 0)**
**Trends change more than rank**
**Uniform policy best for Interbull**

## Implementation

**Adjustments easy for U.S. bulls.**
**Foreign pedigree may be missing.**
**Can’t add future inbreeding if foreign PTA includes past inbreeding**
**Adjust for past and future in September Interbull test run.**
**Hope MACE converts to new scale.**
# Presentation: 119263

## Many body effects in electronic dynamics and transport

- Giovanni Vignale, University of Missouri-Columbia, DMR-0313681

**A new collective mode in the fractional quantum Hall effect**

- The fractional quantum Hall liquid of electrons is one of the most interesting collective states in condensed matter, comparable to superconductivity and Bose-Einstein condensation. Collective density oscillations are a distinctive feature of this state and can be probed by various techniques. Recently, inelastic light scattering  experiments**1** have revealed the existence of two collective modes: one had been known for a long time, but the other is new and puzzling. The two modes tend to approximately the same  frequency at long wavelength, but their behaviors with decreasing wavelength () are opposite.

- Our theory shows that the two modes arise naturally from the internal dynamics of the stresses created by the Coulomb interaction in the liquid. In the standard mode (red curve) the two shear forces (S and LS) act in the same direction, opposite to the bulk magnetic force (L).  In the new mode (green curve) they act in opposite directions.  We have been able to calculate the frequencies of the two modes in terms of a few elastic constants. The calculated dispersions are in qualitative agreement with experiment, not only at long wavelengths, but also, surprisingly, at small ones.

**I. V. Tokatly and G. Vignale cond-mat/0607705**

- 1. Hirjiebehedin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 066803 (2005)

- Frequency difference +-- Experiment**1** and Theory

**Theory**

- = angular frequency    = wavelength

**“****old mode”**

**“****new mode”**
# Presentation: 101159

## ECSSEuropean Cooperation for Space Standardization

- Rainer Grünagel
- ESA/ESTEC
- rgruenag@estec.esa.nl

## ECSS

**What is ECSS ?**
- European Cooperation for Space Standardization
- An effort of ESA, European national agencies **and industry**
**ECSS goal:**
- To create a single European set of (space) standards for all European space agencies and industry

- R.Grünagel - Structural Design Section  ESTEC

## ECSS

**ECSS origin**
- In 1988 EUROSPACE (representing European industry) asked ESA and CNES  to harmonise their PA requirements.
- In 1993 the European space community recognized the general problems and the European Cooperation for Space Standardization was formed.
**Members**
- Full participating members are ESA and the national agencies of Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Norway and UK.
- Industry is represented through EUROSPACE.
- EUMETSAT is an observer / liaison with ISO TC20 SC13 and SC14

- R.Grünagel - Structural Design Section  ESTEC

## ECSS

**Levels of ECSS standards**
**Level 0** - describing policy and objectives of the ECSS system and its architecture
**Level 1** - describing the strategy in each domain (Management, QA and Engineering). Global overview of the requirements and interfaces between the elements of level 2.
**Level 2** - describing required objectives and functions for all aspects of individual domains and disciplines
**Level 3** - describing methods, procedures and tools to achieve the requirements of the level 2 documents. Defining constraints and requirements for interfaces and performance of a product or activity.

- R.Grünagel - Structural Design Section  ESTEC

## ECSS Structure

**ECSS-P-00**
**Standardization**
**Policy Document**

**ECSS-P-001**
**Glossary of Terms**

**ECSS-M-00**
**Space **
**Project Managment**

**Project Breakdown**
**Structure**

**Project**
**Organisation**

**Project Phasing &**
**Planning**

**Configuration**

**Information/**
**Documentation**

**Cost & Schedule**

**Integrated Logistics**
**Support**

**ECSS-Q-00**
**Space **
**Product Assurance**

**Quality Assurance**

**Dependability**

**Safety**

**EEE Components**

**Material Mech.**
**Parts & Process**

**S/W Product**
**Assurance**

**ECSS-E-00**
**Space Engineering**

**System**
**Engineering**

**Electrical**
**& Electronics**

**Mechanical**

**Software**

**Communications**

**Control Systems**

**Ground Systems**
**& Operations**

- R.Grünagel - Structural Design Section  ESTEC

## ECSS

**Status of ECSS **(see also www.estec.esa.nl/ecss)
- Over 26 standards are published
- 49 are in preparation
- ESA, CNES and ASI are already applying some ECSS standards
- Some level 3 standards are:
- Q-20-09A Nonconformance control system
- Q-40-12A Fault Tree Analysis
- E-10-02A Verification
- New 1999 Working group for level 3:
- E-10-07 Exchange of product data (presented by H.P.deKoning)

- R.Grünagel - Structural Design Section  ESTEC
# Presentation: 148681

## Just-In-Time Accessto Interstate Data

**Technical Status**
**August 26, 2004**

## Agenda

**Review of High Level Design**
**Data Flow Diagrams**
**Questions and Answers**

## Goal

- State A

- State B

## Assumptions

**Data should remain in a distributed fashion.**
**A web browser will be used to view data and the display will be the same for all users.**
**Transmission of data will be secure.**
**All users will have to be authenticated and authorized.**
**States will maintain authentication information on their own users.**

## Phase 1

**Proxy Server**

**State A**

**Proxy Server**

**State B**

**OCSE**** ****Web Server**

**Phase 1**

**Web Services - Architecture**

**OCSE Network**

**OCSE Router**

**OCSE Router**

## Making a Request for Information

- OCSE Network

- Proxy Server

- State A

- State B

- OCSE Web Server

- Authenticate and
- Authorize User

- User requests
- services

- Request for Data

- Reply with Data

- Provide Data
- Request by user

- Forward Data
- to user

- Forward requests

**Phase 1**

**Making a Request for Information**

## State B

- OCSE Web Server

- Request for Data

- Reply with Data

- Some of the
- Communications Options:
- SOAP
- XML-RPC
- RPC

**State Receiving and Returning Requested Information**

## State Making a Request for Information

- Proxy Server

- State A

- OCSE Web Server

- Authenticate and
- Authorize User

- User requests
- services

- Provide Data
- Request by user

- Forward Data
- to user

- Forward requests

- Some Transport Protocol Options:
- HTTPS
- HTTP

**State Making a Request for Information**

## State A - Authorization & Authentication of a User

- Proxy Server

- State A

- Authenticate and
- Authorize User

- User requests
- services

- Forward Data
- to user

- Request to authenticate
- and authorize user.

- Response to request.

- Some of the Authentication and Authorization Options:
- LDAP
- XML Digital Signature
- XCBF – XML Common Biometric Format
- SAML – Security Assertion Markup Language
- Other Authentication Methods

**State A - Authorization & Authentication of a User**

## Web Services - Architecture

- OCSE Network

- Proxy Server

- State A

- Proxy Server

- State B

- OCSE Web Server

- FCR – Pointer System

**Web Services - Architecture**

## Phase 2

- OCSE Network

- Proxy Server

- State A

- FCR

- OCSE Web Server

- Authenticate and
- Authorize User

- User requests
- services

- Request for Data

- Reply with Data

- Provide Data
- Request by user

- Forward Data
- to user

- Forward requests

- FCR – Pointer System

**Phase 2**

**Making a Request for Information**

## Next Steps:

**Finalize workgroup consensus items**
**Conduct technical workgroup meetings:**
**Software**
**Communications / Network**
**Refine technical requirements**
# Presentation: 665613

## Cross-site Collaborative Opportunities 

- Methodology & Data Analysis Working Group
- Common Mediators Working Group
- Trans-behavioral Outcome Working Group
- December 6, 2001

## Current Purposes 

- Identify unique cross-site analytic opportunities
- “Clearinghouse” function to assist working groups
- Assist in coordinating data-based activities

## Activities to Address Purposes

- Determine common aspects of study designs between sites
- Identify common mediators
- Code and identify behavioral measures
- Characterize commonalities in interventions e.g., intensity, channels, theoretical approaches

## Codified Database

- Database created that codes availability of measures describes study features:
- Data systems
- Sample characteristics
- Theoretical approaches
- Constructs and measures
- Behaviors and measures

## home

- .

- Individual

- University of

- Minnesota

- 50/50 male to

- female

- Adults (18-54)

- Not Low

- Income

- .

- Individual

- University of

- Rhode Island

- >50% Female

- Older adults

- (55+)

- Not Low

- Income

- .

- Individual

- University of

- Rochester

- .

- Adults (18-54)

- Not Low

- Income

- Clinic-based

- .

- Individual

- University of

- Tennessee

- >50% Female

- Adults (18-54)

- Low-income

- Clinic-based

- Community

- Individual

- Total

- Project Site

- Gender

- Age

- SES

-  Targeted

- Group

- Tx Setting

- Tx Setting -2

- Couples or Family

## Stress

- Measure

- University of

- Minnesota

- No

- No

- No

- Outcome or

- Value

- Expectancies

- No

- No

- University of

- Rhode Island

- No

- Self-Efficacy

- Decisional

- Balance

- No

- No

- No

- University of

- Rochester

- No

- No

- No

- No

- Self

- Determination

- No

- University of

- Tennessee

- Social

- Support

- Self-Efficacy

- Decisional

- Balance

- No

- No

- No

- Project Site

- Social Support

- Self-Efficacy

- Decisional Balance

- Outcome

- Expectancies

- Self-Determination

- a.

## Next Steps -- Organization

- Review coded information for accuracy
- Methods to receive requests from WG for writing project, record newly available measures, and maintenance
- Gauge potential for archiving data

## Thematic Concerns

- Add value to efforts of investigators and working groups
- Reduce redundancies and time burden of multiple requests
- Policies, procedures & safeguards to articulate data-sharing process and protect data
- Retain focus on transtheoretical goals of BCC

## Slide 9

## Meeting Dialogue   

- Process for D & M to support working group activities
- Models of coordination from similar consortia or multi-site studies
- What would data sharing look like?  When and how would it occur?
- Policies and procedures needed to safeguard activities and information
# Presentation: 614323

## IMR: Acquisition of a Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Camera for Research and Education Darrin J. Pochan, University of Delaware    DMR-0414935 

- The IMR has been used to aquire a SAXSess small-angle x-ray camera from Anton Paar to be used as a piece of central equipment for the college of engineering at the University of Delaware.  To date, it is being used primarily by students and post-docs from the Materials Science and Engineering Department and the Chemical Engineering Department.

- Small angle x-ray scattering data on a absolute scale indicating the growth in size of silica nanoparticles with reaction time in solution.  The inset is the average radius of the particles calculated from the scattering curves.

- Fedeyko, J. M.; Rimer, J. D.; Vlachos, D. G.; Lobo, R. F.
- "Spontaneous Formation of Silica Nanoparticles in Basic Solutions of Small Tetraalkylammonium Cations." J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004, 108, 12271.
- Fedeyko, J. M.; Vlachos, D. G.; Lobo, R. F. "Formation and structure of self-assembled silica nanoparticles in basic solutions of organic and inorganic cations." Langmuir 2005, 21, 5197.
- Rimer, J. D.; Vlachos, D.; Lobo, R. F. "Evolution of
- Self-Assembled Silica-Tetrapropylammonium Nanoparticles at High Temperatures." J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 12762.
- Rimer, J. D.; Vlachos, D. G.; Lobo, R. F. "Physical Basis for the Formation and Stability of Silica Nanoparticles in Basic Solutions of Monovalent Cations." Langmuir 2005, in press.

## IMR: Acquisition of a Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Camera for Research and Education Darrin J. Pochan, University of Delaware    DMR-0414935

**Education**
- Under this grant, more than 10 graudate students from the college of engineering from several coPI laboratories (Pochan, Lobo, and Kaler groups) have been able to perform small-angle x-ray scattering experiments as part of their respective PhD research.  In addition, the instrument is being used in a module of the Materials Science and Engineering core curriculum course MSEG602 Structure of Materials.  New students in the MSEG department learn small-angle x-ray scattering as part of their first year core curriculum and perform experiments on the SAXSess instrument during the laboratory portion of the class.

**Outreach**
- To this point, 4 peer-reviewed publications have been published to disseminate the results from this research and provide an educational tool for the students involved.  Several more papers are in preparation.  In addition, the data has been used in more than 10 student presentations at national and international scientific meetings.
# Presentation: 102190

## Heavy Quark Energy Loss

- 20th Anniversary of J/ suppression
- May 9th, 2006, BNL

- (Xin-Nian Wang, LBNL)

## Heavy Quark Energy Loss

- Independent study of jet quenching
- Flavor tagging (color dependence)
- Mass dependence of energy loss
-  “Deadcone effect” **Dokshitzer and Kharzeev** (2001)
- Heavy quark energy loss and modified fragmentation function: **Djordjevic-Gyulassy (2003); Zhang-Wang-Wang (2003); Armesto-Salgado-Wiedemann (2004)**

##  Modified Fragmentation

- B-W. Zhang, E. Wang & XNW (2003)

## Mass dependence of LPM

- Slow clock for formation time

- Factorization approximtion

**Notes:**
Virtual correction important. Note the correlation length enters here

## Heavy quark energy loss

*x**B**=Q**2**/2m**N**E*

## Charm quark energy loss

*x**B**=Q**2**/2m**N**E*

- A=197

## Modified fragmentation function

- D-meson spectra
- Sensitive to large
- z behavior of D(z)!!

- Shift of z z-z

## HERMES data

- E. Wang & XNW
- PRL 2000

## Experimental puzzle

## Importance of elastic energy loss?

**(****S. Wicks, W. Horowitz, M.D. and M. Gyulassy, nucl-th/0512076****)**

**dN****g****/dy=1000.**

## Radiative vs elastic energy loss

## Elastic Energy Loss

- Gluons as basic constituents of QGP (LO QCD)

**Notes:**
Asymptotic form of parton energy loss

## Interference effect in elastic energy loss

## Radiative vs elastic energy loss

- For *E*=10 GeV, T=0.2 GeV, L=6 fm, **s=0.3

## Summary

- Heavy quark energy loss is a unique probe of dense matter via jet quenching
- Mass dependence different L-dependence
- Elastic and radiative energy loss can be included consistently in the same framework
- Elastic energy loss is found to be small (preliminary for light quark)

## Happy Birth Day !
# Presentation: 686784

## Lehigh Northampton Airport Authority

**Managing LVIA Through Uncertain Times**
**George F. Doughty, Executive Director**
**March 18, 2005**

## Governance

- Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority
- Pennsylvania Municipal Authorities Act
- Nineteen Members Appointed by Lehigh and Northampton Counties
- All Municipal Powers – Except Power to Tax

## Sources of Revenue – 2005 Budget

- Total - $21,078,269

## Expenses – 2005 Budget

- Total - $15,859,187

## LVIA Market - 2.5 million people (40 mile radius)

## Our Chronic Issue – Most of our passengers use other airports

- Real potential of LVIA Market is not known, but probably is at least 5 million passengers

- Frequency
- Nonstops
- Price

## Why have major airlines not exploited the potential of LVIA?

- Yield – not volume
- Premium price for convenience
- Hub concentration – PHL, EWR
- “If you don’t want to pay us $1,000 at ABE –  then we will take $500 from you at PHL.”

## Historical Successes

- Major Carriers
-     AC, CO, DL, NW, UA, US
- Scheduled Charter
-     Southeast Airlines
- Initiated Service - August 2002
- Carried 516,048 passengers through 11-30-04 (PIE, SFB, FLL, LAS)
- Service reliable and well received
- Saved LVIA passengers over $10 Million
- Brought $2 Million Income to LNAA
- Proved LVIA to FL market

## Historical Successes

- Southeast terminated on 11-30-04
- 30% of market replaced with:
-     TransMeridian Airlines (started on 2-10-05)
-      Lehigh Valley Air (start on 3-24-05)

## More Bad News Possible

- UA, US in Chapter 11
- DL Weak
- Continued flat growth by majors
- Loss of short haul business traveler

## Strategies

- Cost Containment
- Staff Reductions
- Defer Capital Projects/Expenses
- Focus on Mission Critical Items
- Debt Refinancing/Restructuring
- Moving Functions In-House
- Fixed Base Operator (FBO) - LVAS
- Ground Handling Services
- Aircraft Fueling

## Strategies - continued

- Revenue Management
- Vehicle Parking Lot Rate Adjustments
- Hangar Rental Rate Adjustments
- Airline Fee Adjustments
- Verification of Full Cost Recovery

## Future Options

- New Service
- Expand LVAir
- Real Estate Development
# Presentation: 362648

## Accelerator Group Status

- Scenarios and Stakeholders

- spanacek@fnal.gov

- 05/19/2005

## Scenarios

- US-supplied instrumentation, such as a Schottky detector. Jean Slaughter
- Tools development at FNAL.Suzanne Panacek/Elliott M.
- Analysis from CERN perspective.Mike Lamont
- Magnet testing during hardware commissioningMike Lamm
- Beam commissioning, unobtrusively observing first beam in the LHC.Elvin Harms

- spanacek@fnal.gov

- 05/19/2005

## Scenarios

- Routine maintenance on the beam of an injector.  For example, closing the orbit of the LHC injector (SPS??), which would presumably need to be done at “regular intervals”.  Other maintenance items could be contemplated in this vein, like tuning the injection to the “clockwise” half of LHC while the CERN control room tunes the injection to the “counter-clockwise” half.
- Investigating a quench.
- Monitoring the beam through the synchrotron light monitors and reacting when “things go bad”.

- spanacek@fnal.gov

- 05/19/2005

## Stakeholders

- spanacek@fnal.gov

- 05/19/2005

## Remop vs. working in office

- For what reasons should one go to the Remop vs. staying in the office?
- Shifts
- CERN’s direct link to FNAL expertise
- Guaranteed response time from FNAL to CERN questions. (Dispatching to FNAL experts)
- Centralized communication to LHC so that not everyone calls the LHC when there is a problem
- Stable hardware and software that is up to date and synchronized with the LHC.
- Multiple high quality, large monitors. Video conferencing, phone connections.
- Security, few and controlled holes in the firewall.
- Social aspect of working together is very important (see CDF, Minos)
- Collaborate on beam studies (with CERN or with multiple US Collaborators)
- Passive vs. intrusive studies. Passive study needs auxiliary information displayed on multiple monitors.
- Intrusive study need token and coordination with LHC.
- Ask questions (help desk for LHC related questions)

- spanacek@fnal.gov

- 05/19/2005
# Presentation: 703830

## FTS Networx Enterprise 

## 
Enterprise Services
 9 Mandatory Services
Secure IP and Managed Network Service
42 Non-Mandatory Services

**Enterprise Services**
*** ******9 Mandatory Services***
**Secure IP and Managed Network Service**
***42 Non-Mandatory Services***

- FTS Networx Enterprise

## FTS Networx Enterprise Services

## FTS Networx Enterprise Services

## Pricing - T-3 for Enterprise

**297 buildings are served by FTS2001 today with T3 or greater access **
**83% of the buildings are within 100 miles of a Top 50 city**

## Pricing – FTS Networx Enterprise (1)

**Must offer 9 mandatory IP and Security services for availability at 297 Government locations**
**The 297 locations are actual government buildings presently with data service and T-3 or higher access**
**Must offer, at a minimum, SWC access prices for T-3 and lower speeds as specified in the bid model (the 297 locations)**
**Must price SWCs where service is offered commercially**
**May price non-mandatory services**
** ****- OR -**** **

## Pricing – FTS Networx Enterprise (2)

**Must offer Cellular/Personal Communications Services to following nationwide profile**
**Provide and price service in 100% of Metropolitan Statistical Areas and, at least, in 90% of Rural Statistical Areas **
**May offer prices for additional services**
# Presentation: 188337

## ACCELERATOR PHYSICS VIEW ON RING DATABASE

**Jie Wei**
***SNS Ring/Transport Lines***

**March 13, 2002**

**ORNL/BNL Discussion on Database**

## Database functions

- Ring databases classified in three categories
- Optics Database
- Generic Device Database (GDDB)
- Magnet, Alignment and Survey Database
- From design, to generic devices, to actual elements
- Similar database structure as for RHIC (SYBASE)
- Magnet, alignment, survey database similarly developed for LHC during US-LHC collaboration
- Similar magnet & survey database structure developed for SNS (S. Sathe)

## Optics Database

- Generate input files to existing codes
- Standard Input File (MAD, TEAPOT); TRACE3D; TRANSPORT
- DBSF developed for RHIC SYBASE (S. Tepikian)
- Magnet strength tables
- Aperture
- ...
- Support on-line applications
- Transfer matrices; optics editor; ...
- Support off-line analysis

## Example: RHIC Optics database (rhic99)

## Generic Device Database

- Correlates names (name look-up)
- Site-wide name or survey slot names
- Assembly name
- Serial name for devices
- Magnet families
- Power supply wire-up
- Half-cell type and component
- ...
- Reflects status of the machine device (spares replacement, hook-up)
- Record hierarchical structure of the machine

## Example: RHIC Generic Device database

## Magnet Database

- Record measurement data
- Serial name, measurement date, run number, type, ...
- Transfer function (integral, body, ends)
- Field angle, field angle deviation
- Multipole error data
- Local field map
- Quality assurance
- Record repair history
- Record assembly assignment
- Record spare and replacement history
- Sorting and installation support

## Survey Database

- Need to re-define magnetic center
- Correct magnet center offset and rolls (offset between magnetic and mechanical center, due to e.g. residual ITF variation)
- Record magnet fiducial positions?
- BPM center not measured – beam based correction
- Re-center & correct magnet misalignment

## Example: LHC magnet integral field table

## Magnet analysis & survey support

- Database for magnet measurement & survey data
- Field quality analysis
- Corrector strength setting
- Magnet sorting
- Fiducialization & placement in global coordinate system
- Survey & misalignment evaluation
- Beam-based correction

## Multipole conventions

## Example: RHIC magnet database

## Example: RHIC survey database

## Summary

- Three steps: design, generic device, actual measurement
- We are already behind (e.g. magnet & survey database)
- Fill-up magnet database
- Define and record center; be ready for sorting & survey correction
- Record repair/rework history; record half-cell assignment
- How do we use optics database?
- A software to extract lattice file from the database?

## Slide 15
# Presentation: 926875

## SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS:  EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTUREMars Observer (MO) 

- Bryan Palaszewski
- working with the
- Digital Learning Network
- NASA Glenn Research Center

## Mars Observer (1/3)

- Launched from Earth on September 25, 1992
- Payload on spacecraft
- Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GRS)
- Magnetometer and Electron Reflectometer (MAG/ER)
- Mars Observer Laser Altimeter (MOLA)
- Pressure Modulator Infrared

**Notes:**
MCO failure report

## Mars Observer (2/3)

- Payload on spacecraft (continued)
- Radiometer (PMIRR)
- Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES)
- Mars Observer Camera (MOC)
- The Mars Observer spacecraft was to be the first U.S. spacecraft to study Mars since the Viking missions 18 years before.

**Notes:**
MCO failure report

## Mars Observer (3/3)

- The Mars Observer spacecraft fell silent just 3 days prior to entering orbit around Mars following the pressurization of the rocket engine fuel tanks. The rocket engine was to slow the spacecraft into Mars orbit.
- Lost August 21, 1993
- Planned to enter Mars orbit on August 24, 1993

**Notes:**
MCO failure report

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Lessons Learned Information System (NASA)

- Mars Observer Spacecraft was lost while performing the Mars Orbit Insertion maneuver.
- Premature propellant mixing may have caused an explosion.
- Spacecraft was qualified for Earth orbit, not the Mars’ environment.
- Qualification testing may not have been proper or relevant.

## Mars Observer Accident Causes (1/2)

**The possibility of a propulsion subsystem breach actually includes three different possible scenarios:**
**Liquid oxidizer (nitrogen tetroxide) may have migrated past a check valve in the pressurization lines; during the tank pressurization, the oxidizer could have been forced into lines containing the fuel, liquid monomethylhydrazine, causing the line to burst.**

## Mars Observer Accident Causes (2/2)

**The possibility of a propulsion subsystem breach ...(continued)**
**The pressure regulator could have failed, causing the oxidizer tank to over pressurize and burst. **
**A small pyrotechnic device, or squib, which was fired to open a valve in one of the pressurization system's lines, could have been ejected from the pyrotechnic valve like a bullet and damaged the fuel tank.**

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12
# Presentation: 681022

## The First Stellar Explosionspair production supernova model light curves and spectra

- Daniel Kasen

- Daniel Kasen, w/ Alex Heger, Stan Woosley

## pair-production supernova models

- he120

- Mej  =175 Msun
- 56Ni = 25 Msun
- E  = 60x1052 ergs

- H

- He

- Si

- Ni

- Ni

- H

- He

- Si

- Mej  = 85 Msun
- 56Ni = 0.01 Msun
- E = 6x1051 ergs

- Mej  =130 Msun
- 56Ni = 40 Msun
- E  = 80x1052 ergs

- Mej  70 Msun
- 56Ni = 0.01 Msun
- E  = 8x1051 ergs

- 250 Msun

- 250 Msun

- 150 Msun

- 150 Msun

-                       Initial mass range: 140-260 Msun      56Ni production: 0-50 Msun

- Heger and
- Woosley 2002

## monte carlo radiative transfer

-  Energy Sources
- 1. _Thermal energy_
-     tloss ~ Ro/vexp
- 2. _Radioactivit_y
-     Lrad ~  mass(56Ni)
- 3. _Circumstellar interaction_

-                     3-dimensional, time-dependent, multi-group, with non-LTE solver

- SEDONA code

## V-band light curves

- Type Ia SN
- He: M = 120, Ni = 25
- H:   M = 250, Ni = 25
- H:   M = 150  Ni = 0.07

## optical spectra at day 100

- H150
- “Type II”

- He250
- “Type Ic”

- expansion velocities ~ 5000 km/s (moderate to low)

## spectral indicators of metalicity

- 1 x solar

- 10-2 x solar

- 10-4 x solar

- zero x solar

- model H150 at day 100, vary metalicity

## light curve as a function of redshift

- model H250 (time dilation not included)

- (see also Scannapieco et al., 2003)

## SN2006gy, the brightest observed SN

- Type Ia SN
- He: M = 120, Ni = 25
- H:   M = 250, Ni = 25
- H:   M = 150  Ni = 0.07

- compared to pair production models

## SN2006gy, the brightest observed SN

- compared to less massive (artificially scaled down) models
# Presentation: 177348

## OPC Status

-                             Nov. 2000CA Client->OPC:             Andrei Makhnachev,DESYOPC-> CA Server:           Kay-Uwe Kasemir, LANLOPC Experience:              Matthias Clausen, DESY

## OPC?

- OPC: OLE  COM for Process Control
- COM: Component Object Model, Microsoft/Win32 API
- CORBA w/ actual application support
- All COM Objects have Interface IUnknown plusinterfaces to implement an...
- ActiveX Component/Widget
- ActiveX Automation Server:(Visual Basic, Interpreters)
- _OPC Data Access Server/Client_
- ....

- _IUnknown:_AddRef,Release,QueryInterface

- _IObjectX:_Method1,Method2,...

## OPC Data Access Details

- Specs: http://www.OPCFoundation.org
- Data Access Object Model: OPC Server, Group, Item
- Interfaces:
- Browsing (Merely info for humans, items can also be dynamically created)
- Subscribe to group (max. rate, deadband) for async. notification
- Read/write item data (Timestamp, quality, value)
- AllenBradley, Siemens, National Instruments, ...:
- provide OPC Server as a generic “Driver”

## OPC and CA

- OPC-CAS: OPC client, CA Server
- allows browsing (merely for debugging)
- reads ASCII config file
- puts all Items in one group “Default”, requests 10Hz updates, serves via CA
- Andrei Makhnachev (DESY) wrote CA client/OPC server
- Both: Softing OPC lib.  can distribute binaries, needs license to compile

- SERVER=OPC Simulated Data Demo
- # Explicitly list OPC Name & PV:
- ITEM
- {
-   # Required: Name of OPC Item
-   NAME=SINE:0.0..10.0:2.0
-   # Optional: PV, defaults to Item name
-   PV=Sine
-   # Optional, will be served/observed
-   EGU=Ticks
-   HIHI=9
-   HIGH=8
-   LOW=2
-   LOLO=1
- }

- # Browse OPC Server, pick OPC items via regular
- # expression, maybe use translation file.
- # Here, items matching “SINE:xxx:yyy”
- # will be served as “Sinezzz” where
- # “zzz” is “yyy” translated via numbers.trs which
- # looks like this:
- #    1   one
- #    2   two
- ITEMCLASS
- {
- 	NAME=(SINE):.*:(.*)
- 	TRANSLATE2=numbers.trs
- 	DELIM=:
- 	EGU=Parts
- }

## OPC-CAS Snapshot

## Conclusions?

- OPC: Great Idea for PC platform
- Standard across vendors, no longer separate drivers for LabVIEW, Intellution, VisualBasic, ...
- EPICS 3.14 for Win32 Hosts should support  DTYP “OPC” before implementing any single specific driver   benefit from OPC drivers
- Problems:
- No experience with performance, dependability
- Already different versions (IOPCAsyncIO2...)
- Networked via DCOM but no connection management
# Presentation: 798312

## James W. Freston M.D., Ph.D.Professor of Medicine and Clinical PharmacologyUniversity of Connecticut Health Center

**Uprima****®**** Presentation****TAP Holdings Inc.**

## Safety

## Safety Assessment

- Exposure
- Overview of adverse events
- Syncope
- Evaluation of cardiovascular effects in prospective studies in special populations
- Diabetics
- Patients taking anti-hypertensives and nitrates
- Subjects given Uprima® with alcohol
- Nausea
- Other safety considerations

- Safety-Assessment

## Overall Uprima® Experience (Phase I, II, III)

- Patients/subjects treated:
-  3,035 (2, 4, 5, and 6 mg)
-  1,988 (2 and 4 mg)
- Number of treatment administrations
-  75,449 (2, 4, 5, and 6 mg)
-  35,531 (2 and 4 mg)
- Patients treated for at least 6 months – 461*
- Patients treated for more than one year – 127*

- * At the time of the NDA.

- Safety-Exposure

## Age Distribution

- Age Group

- %

*Phase II/III Studies*

- Safety-Patient Population

## ED Population

**Medical Condition (%)****	****	****Hypertension****	****31%****	****25%****	****Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)****	****16%****	****14% ****	****Dyslipidemia****	****16%****	****14% ****	****Diabetes****	****16%****	****18%****	**

**Uprima****®**** Studies**** **

**Viagra****®**** Studies****1**

- 1	Approval Package for Viagra® (Sildenafil Citrate). FDA.GOV/CDER/CONSUMERINFO/VIAGRA/VIAGRA/HTM. *Joint Clinical Review* p. 14. April 1999.

- Safety-Patient Population

## Concurrent Medications

***Total Patients Taking Concurrent Medication******	******2,155******	****** 90.6*****	****Antihypertensive agents****	****715****	****30.1****	****Cardiac drugs****	****503****	****21.1****	****Psychotherapeutic agents****	****438****	****18.4****	****Antihyperlipidemic agents****	****416****	****17.5****	****Anxiolytics, sedatives, and hypnotics****	****356****	****15.0****	****Antidiabetic Agents****	****330****	****13.9****	****Diuretics****	****227****	****9.5**

**N=2,379****n                    (%)**

*Phase II/III Studies*

- Safety-Patient Population

## Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events >5%

**N=2379**** n         (%)**

**2, 4 mg**
**N=1925****n         (%)**

**Adverse Event**

***Nausea ******	***
***Dizziness******	******	***
***Sweating ******	******	***
**Somnolence ****	****	**
**Yawning ****	****	**
***Vomiting ******	******	***
**Headaches ****	****	**
**Asthenia ****	****	**
***Vasodilatation ******	******	***

*Phase II/III Studies*

- Safety-Adverse Events

***Recommended Doses***

***Includes Higher Than ***
***Recommended Doses***

*** ******298******	******(15.5)***
***180******	******(9.4)***
***111******	******(5.8)***
**155****	****(8.1)**
**117****	****(6.1)**
***  ******53******	******(2.8)***
**102****	****(5.3)**
**  ****57****	****(3.0)**
*** ******51******	******(2.6)***

*** ******756******	******(31.8) ***
*** ******423******	******(17.8)***
*** ******334******	******(14.0)***
** ****320****	****(13.5)**
** ****262****	****(11.0)**
***195******	******(8.2)***
**189****	****(7.9)**
**149****	****(6.3)**
***140******	******(5.9)***
# Presentation: 725377

## Conclusions 

**George Siber, M.D.C.M.**

- Vaccine Serotype OM    	 57   (44, 67) 	69   (0.4, 93)
- Vaccine Related Serotype OM 	 51    (27, 67)
- Non Vaccine Serotype OM 	-33   (-80, 1)
- All Pnc OM                     	 34   (21, 45)
- Recurrent OM                	 16    (-6, 35)	12   (7, 16)
- All OM                              	   6    (-4, 16) 	  7   (4, 9)
- Tube Placement             	 441  (19, 62)	24   (12, 35)

**Efficacy Against Otitis Media  **

- 1 FinOM follow up

- Ruptured ear drum due to vaccine types

## 1.2 to 1.4 million office visits prevented a year 
Associated decrease in antibiotic use

Prevention of 60,000 ear tube surgeries a year  

**Associated decrease in antibiotic use**
**Prevention of 60,000 ear tube surgeries a year **** **

**Public Health Impact of Prevnar****®**** ****on Otitis Media**

## Otitis Media Indication 

**Supported by two randomized controlled trials showing statistically significant decreases in OM outcomes**
**Prevnar immunization has an important medical effect on otitis media disease and its consequences**
**Addition to label ensures accurate communication of information to physicians and parents**
**Vaccines against individual otitis pathogens are all likely to have low overall impact on OM**

## Thank you
# Presentation: 217423

## USDC SeafoodInspection Program

- Policy on Filtered Smoke Process

## Background

- USDC Involvement Began in 1997
- GRAS Petition (1998)
- USDC Inspection Policy (1998)
- FDA Import Bulletin – 16B-95
- Response to GRAS Petition

## USFDA Concerns

- Labeled as Processed Food That Has Been Treated with Tasteless Smoke or Carbon Monoxide
- Not Misrepresented as Fresh Frozen Seafood by Their Label
- Near Normal in Flesh Color

## Verification Protocol

- Request for Service
- Review Documentation
- Site Visit (Twice per Year)
- Color Measurements
- Analytical Analysis
- Histamine
- Protein Swabs
- Microbiological Swabs
- Letter and Report
- Approved List of Facilities
- http://seafood.nmfs.noaa.gov

## Collection of Color Data

- Collected at Selected Process Points
- First Cut, After Exposure (Chilled State)
- 30 Days, 60 Days, 90 Days, 120 Days, 150 Days (Frozen Storage)
- Day 1 – 5 for Each Set (Thawed)
- To Replicate Retail Storage Conditions
- Control Data Collected

## Additional Analysis

- Photographs at Each Stage
- Gas Analysis
- Sensory Analysis
- Histamine Analysis

## Color Theory

- Color Can Be Separated Into Three Stimulus Points (CIELab Scale—L*, a*, b*)
- L* -- Black to White
- a* -- Green to Red
- b* -- Blue to Yellow
- Each Measurement Stimulus Can Be Statistically Manipulated
- Possible to Set a Standard Using Only One Stimulus

## Color Scale

**Color Scale**

## Statistical Design

- Limited Operator Variability
- Standard Methodology
- Define Curve of Untreated Data
- Included Bloomed Tuna Data
- Deleted Two Outliers
- Performance Characteristics
- Highest Value

## Setting of the Colormetric Standard

- Define “Near Normal” Tuna Color
- Commercial Factor
- a* Value Dramatically Affected by the Process
- Recommended Standard:
- 			    **a* = 16.2**

## Policy Status

- Standard Field Tested
- No Adjustments to Standard Warranted
- Meetings
- Industry
- Importers and Retailers
- Regulatory Agencies
- Consumer Organizations

## Enforcement of Standard

- Present Results
- AFDO Meeting (June 2002)
- Publications
- Federal Register Notice
- Final Standard Set (September 2002)

## Decomposition Study

- Answer Three Key Questions
- Can this process mask decomposition?
- What will decomposed tuna look like if subjected to this process?
- Can sensory analysis be used reliably for this product?

## Decomposition Study Approach

- Evaluate Four Quality Levels
- High Pass, Borderline Pass, Borderline Fail, High Fail
- Three CO Concentration Levels
- 1-5%, 20%, 50% or greater
- Two Exposure Times
- 24 Hours, 48 Hours
- Two Decomposition Temperatures
- Iced, Ambient

## Decomposition Study Milestones

- Sample Preparation – March 2002
- Sensory Panel Analyses – April 2002
- Final Report – June 2002

## Labeling Issues

- Processed Product
- Any Statement on the Label, Must Fully Comply with Labeling Laws (Net Weight)
- Nutritional Labeling
- Bulk Pack vs Retail Pack
- Under 2lbs—Possible Retail Pack
- Individual Steak Packs
- Selling to Wholesale Consumer Clubs
# Presentation: 778708

## Synergistic Physicochemical Properties of Macromolecule-Metal ComplexesLaurence A. Belfiore, Colorado State University, DMR 0320980

**Broader Impacts:**
**Textbook Development**
***Physical Properties of Macromolecules***
- 831 pages completed as of 07/11/2007
- Under contract with John Wiley publishing
- Expected release date; September 2008
**International Collaborations**
***Institut Charles Sadron (CNRS), Strasbourg, France (JM Guenet)***
- Thermoreversible gelation in amorphous polymers that form complexes with visible-photon-emitting lanthanides for soft-matter photonic applications (smart gels)
***Biomaterials Group, University of Trento (Claudio Migliaresi)***
- Applications of macromolecule-metal complexes in *Tissue Engineering;* regeneration and accelerated growth of bone cells on surface-modified carbon nanotubes that are aligned in block copolymer domains via metal coordination

***Where are we going?***
**Biological Interactions with Carbon Nanotubes and Metal-Mediated Synthetic Macromolecules**
***Development of biocompatible polymers with spontaneously aligned nanotubes that will accelerate bone cell growth***

## Laurence A. Belfiore, Colorado State University, DMR 0320980Empirical Correlation of Tg-Enhancement w/ Ligand Field Stabilization Energies (LFSE); where have we been?

- 6-coordinate < Tg
- 5-coordinate > Tg

**  ****Poly(4-vinylpyridine)**

**Poly(L-histidine)**

- Co2+ < Ni2+ < Ru2+

***below***
***T******g***

***above***
***T******g***
# Presentation: 919330

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

**0**

**5**

**10**

**15**

**20**

**25**

**30**

**35**

**40**

**Year**

**1974**

**1979**

**1984**

**1989**

**1994**

**1999**

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

**0**

**1**

**2**

**3**

**4**

**5**

**6**

**7**

**Year**

**1984**

**1989**

**1994**

**1999**

**MUMPS - reported cases per 100,000 population **
**by year, United States, 1984-1999**

**MUMPS - reported cases per 100,000 population by year, United States, **
**                 ****1974-1999**

**Reported Cases per 100,000 Population**

**Reported Cases per **
**100,000  Population**
# Presentation: 164517

## What Does an End User Want?

- I want to be able to do my work
- Independently.
- I am an adult.
- I usually know enough to do my job.
- That’s why they hired me.

## If I need to know something new

- I either want to get the information myself,
- Or I want someone to hand it to me,
- Or I want someone just to tell me the answer.
- I don’t want an involved explanation of how I can get it for myself.

## If it’s too hard to get, I don’t really need it. 

- Sometimes I like to get out of my office to go get something.
- Mostly, I’d rather stay near my desk.

## I don’t really care how much things cost. 

- Unless it comes out of my budget,
- Or the amount is scandalous and we’re being cheated.

## I have my favorite sources. 

- When they fail me, I want to look at everything, and choose what I want.
- Sometimes I don’t know what I’m looking for until I find it.
- Sometimes I like looking at things I don’t need right now.

## I’m not afraid of my computer. 

- In fact, I can usually make it do what I want it to do.
- If I can’t, I get someone else to make it work.
- Actually, I rather like my computer, and I want to see more of what it can do.
- But not when I have a deadline.
# Presentation: 144641

## Data Access Improvements

- Mike Moore
- mike.moore@gsfc.nasa.gov
- ESDIS Project
- July 24, 2002

## Overview

- Working with Data Access Working Group (DAWG)
- Identify and prioritize needed changes
- Addressing many items through Synergy program
- Expect to receive SWGD distribution recommendations soon
- Will address as funds become available based on SWGD priorities
- Implementing SWGD ingest and archive recommendations based on available funds
- Archiving L1A subsets
- Enhancing Data Pools to provide more on-line data and data services
- Initial data pool operational at GSFC DAAC
- Enhancing HDF Toolset (HEG) to aid in use of retrieved data
- Integrating UAH HEW into ECS

## DAWG Results to Date

## DAWG Results To Date (cont.)

## Data Pool CY’02 Enhancements

**Capabilities to be delivered by**** December**** 2002:**
- Population via search and script-based ingest
- Interfaces to external ECHO & EDG search engines
- Personalized data views, bookmarks and data themes
- Access via OpenGIS interfaces
- Data access services via HDF Toolset (HEG)
- Compression on distribution
- Expanded capacity and throughput (due in August 2002)
- NSIDC: 2 TB
- EDC: 44 TB; on-line ASTER L1B in GeoTIFF
- LaRC: 25 TB
- GSFC: 63 TB; on-line MODIS L1B data to smooth flow to MODAPS
- Management of NEPSTER direct broadcast and Rapid Response data for MODIS
- Consistency checking tools
# Presentation: 051308

## Course Goal

- Upon completion of the unit, students will be able to describe stewardship activities and issues relating to the Department of Energy’s activities on the Oak Ridge Reservation

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Lesson 2 Objectives

- Discuss the essential attributes of stewardship
- Discuss the basic elements of an effective stewardship program
- Research stewardship-related information systems on the Web

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## The Essential Attributesof Stewardship 

- Responsibility
- Long-term effectiveness
- Adaptability

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## The 7 Basic Elements of an Effective Stewardship Program 

- Authority and funding
- Stewards
- Operations
- Institutional controls
- Physical controls
- Information systems
- Research

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## The Three Types of Stewards

- Principal
- Regulatory
- Community

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Stewardship Operations

- Monitoring
- Surveillance
- Maintenance
- Enforcement
- Inspection and re-evaluation
- Public participation

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Examples of Physical Controls

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Greenfield Area - Oak Ridge’s Horizon Center 

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Brownfield Area – DOE’s Heritage Center (K-25 Site)

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## In Situ Vitrification

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship

## Lesson 2 Objectives Review

- Discuss the essential attributes of stewardship
- Discuss the basic elements of an effective stewardship program
- Research stewardship-related information systems on the Web

- Lesson 2 - Exploring the Elements of Stewardship