# Presentation: 139624

## Questions Presented 
at the Joint Meeting 
of the 
Arthritis and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Meeting

February 18, 2005

**at the Joint Meeting **
**of the **
**Arthritis and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Meeting**
**February 18, 2005**

## Celecoxib 

- Do the available data support a conclusion that celecoxib significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular events?
-  Does the overall risk versus benefit profile for celecoxib support marketing in the US?
- If yes, please describe the patient population(s) in which the potential benefits of celecoxib outweigh the potential risks and what actions you recommend that FDA consider implementing to ensure safe use of celecoxib

## 2.  Valdecoxib

- Do the available data support a conclusion that valdecoxibsignificantly increases the risk of cardiovascular events?
- Does the overall risk versus benefit profile for valdecoxib support marketing in the US?
- If yes, please describe the patient population(s) in which the potential benefits of valdecoxib outweigh the potential risks and what actions you recommend that FDA consider implementing to ensure safe use of valdecoxib

## 3.  Rofecoxib

- Do the available data support a conclusion that rofecoxib significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular events?
- Does the overall risk versus benefit profile for rofecoxib support marketing in the US?
- If yes, please describe the patient population(s) in which the potential benefits of rofecoxib outweigh the potential risks and what actions you recommend that FDA consider implementing to ensure safe use of rofecoxib.

## 
If the available data support a conclusion that one or more COX-2 selective agents increase the risk of cardiovascular events, please comment on the role, if any, of concomitant use of low-dose aspirin in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients treated with COX-2 selective NSAIDs.

- If the available data support a conclusion that one or more COX-2 selective agents increase the risk of cardiovascular events, please comment on the role, if any, of concomitant use of low-dose aspirin in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients treated with COX-2 selective NSAIDs.

## What additional clinical trials or observational studies, if any, do you recommend as essential to further evaluate the potential cardiovascular risk of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdecoxib?  

	What additional clinical trials or observational studies, if any, do you recommend as essential to further evaluate the potential benefits (e.g., reduced gastrointestinal risk) of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdecoxib?  
	Please be specific with regard to which COX-2 selective agent to study, trial design, patient populations, control groups, endpoints, duration, sample size, etc.

- 	What additional clinical trials or observational studies, if any, do you recommend as _essential_ to further evaluate the potential benefits (e.g., reduced gastrointestinal risk) of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdecoxib?
- 	Please be specific with regard to which COX-2 selective agent to study, trial design, patient populations, control groups, endpoints, duration, sample size, etc.

## 
Do you recommend that the labeling for these products include information regarding the absence of long-term controlled clinical trial data to assess the potential cardiovascular effects of these drugs?  

	If so, please describe how you recommend that information be conveyed (e.g., warning, precaution).

- Do you recommend that the labeling for these products include information regarding the absence of long-term controlled clinical trial data to assess the potential cardiovascular effects of these drugs?
- 	If so, please describe how you recommend that information be conveyed (e.g., warning, precaution).

## What additional clinical trials or observational studies, if any, do you recommend as essential to further evaluate the potential cardiovascular risk of the non-selective NSAIDs?   Please be specific with regard to which non-selective NSAIDs (i.e., all or only selected agents), trial design, patient populations, control groups, endpoints, duration, sample size, study drug etc.

## With regard to evaluation of cardiovascular risk, what studies do you recommend as essential to be completed and reviewed prior to approval of new NSAIDs?  With regard to the evaluation of the potential benefits (e.g., reduced gastrointestinal risk), what studies do you recommend as essential to be completed and reviewed prior to approval of new NSAIDs?  Please be specific with regard to trial design, patient population, control groups, endpoints, duration, sample size, safety monitoring and patient protections, etc.

## If the pre-approval studies recommended as essential in question 8 do not demonstrate an increased risk of cardiovascular events for a new NSAID, please comment on how FDA should handle the issue of cardiovascular risk in labeling.  For example, would the absence of a cardiovascular risk signal in the pre-approval database preclude the need for any warnings or precautions in the labeling for the new product?  Alternatively, should all future NSAIDs carry a “class” warning or precaution about cardiovascular risk even in the absence of a signal of increased risk in the pre-approval database?  If yes, please describe your recommendations for the “class” labeling regarding cardiovascular risk with particular attention to whether you recommend it apply to all NSAIDs or only COX-2 selective NSAIDs.