BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 682880

## Safety Update

***Col Lyle Letteer***
***National Safety Officer***
***National Chief of Safety***
***w4ke@mindspring.com***
***1-888-211-1812 x 350***
***678-859-6298***

## Yearly Mishap Comparison Current as of: 10 August 06

## FY 2006 Hours vs. Mishaps

## FY 98 – 06 Hrs vs. Mishaps

## FY 2006 Age vs. Mishap Rate

## FY 2006 Senior Pgms vs. Mishap Rate

## FY 06 LVL 1 Members Having A Mishap

##  FY 2005 Aircraft Mishap Repair

- $293,000

## FY 2006 Aircraft Mishap Repair

- $214,000

## FY 2005 Ground Mishap Repair

- $47,162

## FY 2006 Ground Mishap Repair

- $54,915

## Where Have We Been?(CAP Aircraft Accident Rate 1972 – 2006)

## FY 2006 Accident Rate

- 2.45
- The lowest CAP Accident Rate since 2000

## Effective Safety Culture May Have  Prevented This Accident

- Mountain Flight Clinic
- IP was an ATP, CFII. Mission IP & Check Pilot
- 12,500 hours
- 2- year history of
-  undisciplined behavior
- Routinely broke rules “meant for less skilled pilots”
- Multiple aircraft incidents
- Does this sound like a Check Pilot?
- Leadership was aware but, failed to intervene

- AM Ground School covered safety precautions
- IP and 2 students flew into a draw with steep terrain 5 times at tree-top level
- During the course reversal, the tail snagged a tree
- The crash killed all three
- A key position filled by the wrong person
- Standards were not enforced

## Remember

- When you look in the
- 	mirror, you see the
- 	person most responsible
- 	for your safety.
# Presentation: 687696

## NSF Nuclear Physics

- Budget Overview: FY2003, FY2004
- NSF Initiatives
- Physics Division issues

## NSF NP Program

- Facility: MSU Coupled Cyclotron Facility
- University Facilities: ND, FSU, SUNY-SB
- User Groups: RHIC, JLAB
- Collaborations:
- LANSCE (UCNA, npd); NIST
- Solar neutrinos, double beta decay
- Individuals

## Research Highlights

- Muon g-2

- Neutron Monochromator
- at NIST

## Research Highlights

- Search for Stable 16Be

- Breakout from Hot CNO Cycle

## Research Highlights

- Distribution of Proton Charge and Magnetism

- Dense Matter Equation of State

## NSF/MPS FY2003 Budgets

- Budgets:    	FY2002	FY2003		FY2003
-  ($ millions)	(Actual)  (Request)	(Final)
- NSF R&RA	3,599	3,783		4,083 (+13.1%)
- MPS	     	   920	   942	   	1,041 (+13.1%)
- Physics		   196	   193

**Notes:**
- 0.65% overall reduction
- Physics Division
- “low double digit” percentage increase
- Advance guidance: PI programs get 5% boost

## NSF/MPS FY2004 Budgets

- Budgets:    	FY2003		FY2003		FY2004
-  ($ millions)	 (Request)	(Final)		(Request)
- NSF R&RA	3,783		4,083		4,106 (+8.5%,+0.6%)
- MPS	     	   942	   	1,041		1,061 (+12.7%,+1.9%)
- Physics		   193				   217

**Note:**
- % change over ??? yet to be resolved

## NSF Initiatives

- MRI: deadline past, proposals under review
- FY2002: $640K (BigBite, NP Astro)
- ITR
- Deadline past, proposals under review
- FY2004 is last planned year
- FY2002: $500K for PHENIX/Globus

## Physics Division

**Physics Frontiers Centers**
- 4 funded in FY2001, 1 in FY2002
- 2 held over; anticipate funding
- Plasma
- JINA
- next competition begins August 2005
- steady state
- every 3 years on 6-year cycle
- existing centers to be folded in to competition

## Physics Division

**New programs**
- Biological Physics
- Physics at the Information Frontier
- Advanced computing
- Networks
- Quantum information science
- Accelerator Physics and Mid-Sized Instrumentation
- NSF-wide concern
- FY2005

## NSAC Charges

- Nuclear Theory
- Opportunities
- People and Tools
- Fundamental Neutron Science
- What is the present/future science context?
- Education
- Where are we now? Where do we want to be?
- How do we get there?
# Presentation: 383280

## Inkyu’s   X  - FILE :Local Compactness

- 21st Century PHOBOS presents

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## Motivation : Flow systematics

- Dilution

- Enhancement

- Jet

- Can we do STAR-like jet study? Don’t have Pt trigger...
- If yes, 1) useful for Flow systematics, 2) potential new physics menu

- Is Flow the unique source E-by-E modification of dN/dd ?
- STAR showed “Jet-ness” at RHIC...
- -    v2 = Flow (x%) + Jet (1-x %)

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## E-by-E Jet-finding from dNh/dd

- dN/d ~ flat from =-2 to =2.
- full azimuthal acceptance,  to .

- Need to correct Octagon acceptance (phase space, cracks).
- Need to fix Hot/Dead channels, fix CMN problem.
- Need to apply 2D Poisson correction, Occ().

- Similar to v2

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## ATLAS/MGS algorithm : Local Compactness

- AHD (Average Hit Density)
- 	= #hits / Total Area
- LHD (Local Hit Density)
- 	= #hits inside / window size

**AHD = 24/(2******** x 4) ~ 0.95, **
**LHD = 9/(******** r****2**** ) ~ 4.47**
**LC= 4.7! **

**LC**** **= LHD/AHD

- Designed for Top quark mass, Heavy-Higgs search
- Dynamical Jet size variation, give the best Jet energy calibration
- Image Processing method, Rely on compactness, No license fee

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : peripheral

- LC>2

- PR01 data (Flow)

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : peripheral

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : peripheral

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : peripheral

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : mid-central

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : mid-central

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## A typical LC event : most central

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## # of LCs : peripheral events

- MC shows more LCs (Flow, Fluctuation)

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## # of LCs : mid-central events

- Starting from bin 4, Data show more LCs (Jet-ness ?)

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## # of LCs : central events

- Data show 3 or 4 times more LCs, even di-jets (Jet-ness !)

**4 times higher Prob**

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002

## Summary

**Data show higher Prob. of  Local Compactness!**
- much more than the contribution from Flow
**Are they Jets? CMN problems? Secondary shower?**
- important source of Non-flow correlation
**At best, can be a new physics menu**
**We have larger acceptance (-2 to 2).  STAR: -0.7 to 0.7**
**At worst, can be used for v2 systematics (non-flow)**
- Still long way to go,  to get a conclusion

- Inkyu Park - Phobos Collaboration Meeting - BNL

- October 4, 2002
# Presentation: 004609

## SNAP vs. Ground-basedSupernova Missions

**Alex Kim**
**For the SNAP collaboration **
**Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory**
**January 2003**

## Supernova Mission Simulator

## Telescope Specifications

**We adopt the specified SNAP mission.**
**LSST information is primarily from the Dark Matter Telescope website, an LSST candidate.**
**SNAP 0.7 sq deg FOV, LSST 7 sq deg FOV**

|  | SNAP | LSST – class
WITH NIR CAMERA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aperture (m) | 2 | 8.5 |
| Secondary Aperture (m) | 0.4 | 5.48 |
| Obscuration | 0.16 | 0.55 |
| Spot diagram RMS (arcsec) | 0.05 | 0.22 |
| Jitter RMS (arcsec) | 0.01 | 0 |
| Throughput | 0.984 (Silver coating) | 0.863*0.984 (Aluminum coating + corrector + window)
 |
| Observatory | Space | Mauna Kea or Paranal |

## Ground Observing Grid

| Site
Seeing and weather statistics taken from observatory websites and ESPAS Site Summary Series | Mauna Kea | Paranal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of  fields | 1
All year and full night observations of a single field at a equatorial pole | Multiple
Choose fields with low E(B-V) and  but limited visibility throughout the night and year |
| Cadence | 4-6
Realistic for one telescope | Every night
Assumes 4-6 dedicated telescopes
 |

- We specifically examine the possible **depth** of ground missions.
- How well can very high-z supernovae be observed from the ground?

## Malmquist bias

**1-2 hour exposures at low airmass deeper than all-night observations at the equatorial poles**
**Saturated observations give a common detection limit**

## Simulated SNAP Light Curves

- z=1.2

- z=1.4

- Rest B-band

- Rest V-band

## Simulated Multiple-field Light Curves

- z=1.2

- z=1.4

- Rest B-band

- Rest V-band

**Simulated Multiple-field Light Curves**

## Analysis of Simulated Data

**Fit each light curve**
**	****Rest-frame B through V filters are fit for peak brightness and stretch.**
**	****Other filters are fit for peak brightness**
**The distance modulus and host-galaxy dust extinction are simultaneously determined from light curve parameters for each supernova**

## Determination of distance modulus

**Assuming a Cardelli, Clayton, & Mathis dust model and Rv=3.1**

## Determination of distance modulus

**Assuming a Cardelli, Clayton, & Mathis dust model**

## Summary

**Ground-based wide-field surveys are limited in redshift depth**
**In the best case considered, discovery Malmquist bias will be significant at z > ~1**
**Host galaxy dust measurement will introduce extremely large extinction uncertainty from the ground at z>0.8**
**Other possible light-curve parameters (rise-time, plateau level) will be more difficult to measure from the ground**
# Presentation: 296890

## Cortez Lawrence PhD, JD

- Superintendent, EMI
- 16825 S. Seton Ave. NETC N-401
- Emmitsburg, MD 21727
- 301-447-1286
- cortez.lawrence@dhs.gov
- National Integration Center, National Preparedness Directorate
- FEMA, DHS

## DRAFT

- (A) Acting,    Dotted Lines are Coordination   Solid Lines Are Command and Control

**National Preparedness Directorate**
_**Deputy Administrator –PAS**_
**8 FTEs**

**Community Preparedness Division**
_**Director – SES Career**_
- Vacant
**17 FTEs**

**Preparedness Doctrine, Planning and Analysis **_**Assistant Administrator**_ – _**SES Career**_
- Corey Gruber*
**13 FTEs **

**Grants Capabilities Division**
_**Director SES Career**_
- David Kaufman (Acting)
**112 FTEs**

**National Integration Center**
_**Assistant Administrator**_
_**SES Career**_
- Vacant
**9 FTEs**
**See separate slide**

**Technical Hazards**
**Division**
_**Director SES Career**_
- Vacant
**166 FTEs**

**Senior Law Enforcement Advisor**

_**NPD Staffing **_**(8 TOTAL)**
- Deputy Administrator
- Assistant Deputy Administrator Career SES
- Executive Officer GS-15 Schedule C (Jana White)
- Executive Assistant GS-14 Schedule C (Mike Koroluk)
- External Relations Coordinator Career SES (Andy Mitchell)
- 2 Administrative Assistants GS-11

**DRAFT**

## DRAFT

- (A) Acting,    Dotted Lines are Coordination   Solid Lines Are Command and Control

**Noble Training Center**
**4 FTE**

**Training and Exercises Integration (TEI)**
_**Director SES Career**_
- Steve Schulte
**18 FTEs**

**National Integration Center (NIC)**
_**Assistant Administrator**_
_**SES Career**_
- Jim Kish Acting
**See above slide**

**Administrative Support**
**2 FTEs**

**Center for Domestic Preparedness**
_**Director**_
- Marion Cain
**44 FTE**

**EMI**
_**Director **_
_**SES Career**_
- Cortez Lawrence
**63 FTE**
**15 CORE**
**18 DAE**

**National Exercise Division (NED)**
_**Director SES Career**_
- Jim Kish
**10 FTEs**

**State and Local Exercises**
- Branch Chief
** **
**9 FTE**

**National and Regional Exercises **
- Branch Chief
**9 FTE**

**Incident Management Systems**
_**Director Career SES**_
- Al Fluman-Acting
**60 FTE**

**National Exercise Simulation Center (NSEC)**

**US Department of Homeland Security/FEMA**

_**National Integration Center (NIC) Staffing**_
- Assistant Administrator Career SES
- Deputy Assistant Administrator GS-15
- Executive Assistant GS-14
- Administrative Assistant GS-11

**United States Fire Administration **

**Training and Exercise Coordination and Planning Office**

**DRAFT**

## Cortez Lawrence PhD, JD

- Superintendent, EMI
- 16825 S. Seton Ave. NETC N-401
- Emmitsburg, MD 21727
- 301-447-1286
- _cortez.lawrence@dhs.gov_
# Presentation: 133339

## Convocation of Professional Engineering Societies and the NAE

- Joseph Bordogna
- National Science Foundation
- http://www.nsf.gov/bordogna
- The Academy Building
- Washington, DC
- 4 May 1998

## Putting Our Ideals to WorkThe Year 2025

- “An ideal is but a flaming vision of reality.”

- -- Joseph Conrad
-      (1857-1924)

## The TaskThe Year 2025

- Credentials of the engineer?
- Societal recognition of the engineer?
- Assessment of the engineer’s worth?
- Sense of professionalism:
- within _the_ community?
- within the engineering community?

## Career FundamentalsThe Year 2025

- Simplicity

- Complexity

- System

- Productivity

- Innovation

- Commodity

- Design

- Team

- Cognition

- Making & Moving

- What was, and harder to get

- What is, and will be

- Features not gleaned from the parts

- A 20th century focus

- A 21st century focus

- What all that is new, becomes

- Manifestation of intent

- Intellectual diversity

- Major computer-communications tool

- Adam Smith’s stuff

## The Credentials/Skill SetThe Year 2025

- Handle projects from initial conception of an idea through to product realization
- Understand, nurture, and capitalize sustainably on nature
- Be alpha-numeric literate
- Articulate team goals, influence others to invest in them, evince trust at all levels
- Envision rational solution scenarios to open-ended challenges
- Act as catalyst and master integrator in multifaceted, multidisciplinary projects
- Understand and practice quality issues

## The Credentials/Skill SetThe Year 2025

- Manifest a strategic intent in design
- Enable comfort in interpersonal relations
- Pursue standards-based practice
- Practice creative transformation
- Focus on innovation
- Sense the coupling among seemingly disparate issues
- Make sense of complexity
- Contribute to, extract from, participate in the world’s collective intelligence base
- Be an astute observer of strategic inflection points and anticipate their consequences at the moment of inflection

## Societal Image of the EngineerThe Year 2025

- Astute maker
- Trusted innovator
- Ensurer of safety/quality of life
- Change agent
- Master integrator
- Enterprise enabler
- Technology steward
- Knowledge handler
-                 - - - - -

## A Sense of ProfessionalismThe Year 2025

- Qualification genesis:
- Education → ABET-like accredited degree
- Experience → Practice-based examination
- Continued competence assurance:
- Technical → documented record of performance
- Professional → outcome enablers (standards, codes, 	   best practices, ethics,...)
- Workplace milieu
- Sponsored practice
- Independent practice
- Unity professional society

**International Licensure (Certification) for Global Mobility Common Code of Ethics**

## Step Up to the BarThe Year 2025

- “The day shall not be up so soon as I, to try the fair adventure of tomorrow.”

- -- William Shakespeare
-      (1564-1616)
# Presentation: 713274

## LCLS Timing

- Outline
- Scope
- The order of things
- Introducing the PNET VME receiver
- Status of the PNET VME receiver
- System diagram
- Looking at timing pulse to pulse
- LCLS MPG
- EVG
- Conclusions

## Scope

- LCLS timing system is used to transmit a fiducial 360 Hz signal to all triggered devices in LCLS
- System requirements (speed and content) are known: receive 128 bit PNET data at 360 Hz; append add’l info; operate at 120 Hz
- The component parts are known: PNET VME receiver, EVG-200 and EVR-200
- The interfaces are being defined

## The order of things

- The one and only SLC Master Pattern Generator (MPG)
- Takes as input: 360 Hz fiducial from SLC PDU is the signal to create a new PNET buffer
- Performs tasks:
- creates PNET buffers
- responds to faults
- Outputs PNET buffers to all micros and PNET VME receiver on the ***next*** 1/360 s fiducial

## Introducing the PNET VME receiver

- N

## Status of the VME PNET receiver

- Hardware prototype is finished (1 instance)
- Board is 3 slots wide to accommodate on board cable modem interface to PNET
- Engineering Design Specification doc written
- Driver and device support (bi, mbbiDirect to access each variable in PNETbuffer) written. Compiled only for Synergy PPC running RTEMS 4.6.2

## System Diagram

## Looking at timing pulse to pulse

## Looking at timing pulse to pulse

## Looking at timing pulse to pulse

## LCLS MPG

- Takes the PNETbuffer with appended epicsTimeStamp and checksum fault indicators
- Adds on LCLS application commands
- Adds on any newly detected faults
- Informs EVG that data is ready

## EVG

- On board FPGA packages/chunks 24 byte LCLS MPG data and sends to EVR at 125 MHz
- Data arrives in EVR in 0.6 microseconds + fiber travel time (which depends on distance)

## Conclusions

- LCLS MPG needs to be designed
- LCLS MPG/EVG interface needs defining
- EVR/SLC-aware IOC interface needs defining
- Performance and reliability from PNET through to EVG must be measured
- But I guess there has been some progress...
# Presentation: 685006

## Texas Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS)

- Enacted - 1999
- 2,000 new MW by 2009
- Status - 2005
- 1322 MW added
- 486 MW under construction
- 720 MW authorized/permitted
- Over $1.5 Billion invested
- Construction, O&M jobs

- Carole Keeton Strayhorn, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

## Texas Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS)

- Expansion by 2005 Legislature
- 5,000 new MW by 2015
- 500 MW non-wind carve out
- Fixes “chicken-and-egg” problem:
- PUC designates best development zones
- Transmission will be built to zones
- Cost recovery for transmission owners is assured
- $3.5 billion net economic benefit

- Carole Keeton Strayhorn, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

## RPS Net Economic Benefit

- © 2005 by The Perryman Group
# Presentation: 134380

## Use of  a Relational Database at Leda

- Bob Dalesio 11-27-98

## Previous Approach

- Wiring diagrams in Access (RDB)
- Database in Capfast

## Capfast Vs. RDB

- Capfast
- Graphical View of data
- Hierarchical creation/viewing
- Drawing to make relationships

- RDB
- Easy tabular report generation
- Arbitrary Query Capability
- Table entry to configure

## Capfast Discussion

- Capfast is a very easy tool to use to define hierarchical systems - subsystem, devices, components.
- Capfast uses lines to depict relationships between these elements (these show record processing and data flow very intuitively)
- Many instances of the components can be created with only one copy of  the template - which can be modified at any time - changing all instances
- Fields like DTYP, LINR, EGUF, EGUL, ZNAM, ONAM are all in property sheets that must be opened to modify them
- Changes to these fields require selecting each property to modify
- Arbitrary reports are not possible - unless the ASCII report is fed into a relational database (we have a prototype tool operational to do this)

## RDB Discussion

- An RDB provides very versatile report generation capability
- Data entry is particularly easy - particularly for entering the same value into many records at the same time
- The ability to order the report based on any field makes the verification of hardware addresses and the checking of name spelling particularly simple
- It is very difficult to see complex EPICS record relationships by following the text entries in an RDB
- Data and processing links would be more difficult to enter as names would need to be spelled properly (where Capfast only requires a wire)

## LEDA Vacuum System Approach

- Use Capfast to create the hierarchical description of the database - subsystem, device, component, signals
- Use Capfast to configure the process flow and data flow - making all SCAN, FLNK, soft INP/OUT, NPP/PP, CALC, and HIGH for BO visible on the schematic.
- From the Capfast produced database - create an Access database
- In Access - enter configuration fields: hw INP/OUT, LINR, DTYP, EGUF, EUGL, ZNAM, ONAM etc....
- Load the database from Capfast then the database from Access - EPICS will create records if there is no existing record - or overwrite any fields in the last loaded database

## Results

- Capfast database was defined by the project engineer
- RDB parameters were entered by a technician
- Reports generated for signal checkout from Access expedited the process
- Changes required to classes of channels for labels, hardware type and engineering units could be done to 10’s or hundreds of records in seconds
- Loading two databases slows the reboot time by about 10 seconds.
- Having the source in two places requires more coordination.
- Deleting or changing the names of existing records was the most difficult operation - it required locating and deleting the records in Access
- The inconvenience for deleting records was more than compensated for by the ease of channel check out and ability to reconfigure many channels at once. The schematics are still the easiest way to understand a database.
# Presentation: 486872

## Lunar Oxygen Production from Ilmenite/Fluid Particle Processing Carbotek Development Laboratories, Houston, TX

- Innovation
-    Developed conceptual design for lunar oxygen production system
-     based on fluidized-bed hydrogen reduction of lunar ilenite.
-   Laboratory reduction of lunar stimulants and fabrication of
-     models  for study of fluidized bed dynamics at g-1 and 1/6-g

- Accomplishments
-    Determined reaction kinetics for numerous lunar stimulants an development
-     correlations for actual lunar samples.
-    Measured bubble  sizes in “two-dimensional” fluidized beds at 1-g and at
-     1/6-g on NASA’s KC-135 variable gravity aircraft. Verified two-phase (gas-
-     solid) flow theory at lunar gravity for fluidized-bed  reactors.
-    Demonstrated smooth, downward transfer of solids through standpipe
-     transfer  mechanisms for multi-staged fluidized-bed reactors.

- Commercialization
- Private funding of research since 1991 advanced state-of-the-art considerably with reduction
-       of actual lunar samples and design of additional KC-135 experiment packages.
- Other applications of lunar oxygen such as a thrust enhancer for a nuclear rocket engine, are
-      opening new markets and funding sources
- Phase two SBIR contract enabled Carbotek to add scientifically skilled employees and expand research capabilities.
- Private funding from Shimizu Crop. In 1991 to continue research.
- JSC funded KC 135 lunar gravity flights and Lunar oxygen pilot  plant based on this technology.

- Government/Science Applications
- NASA identified lunar oxygen production as enabling
-   technology for solar system exploration - hydrogen
-   reduction is baseline process.
- Lunar oxygen production enables substantial mass
-   reduction for transportation systems and near
-   self-sufficient lunar base operations

- Points of Contact:
-    -  NASA Jane I Fox
-    -  Company Mike Gibbon--cdl@Carbotek.com
- 1984 SBIR Phase II; NAS 9 17288; SS 09-11

- Johnson Space Center
- Date of Update 2-22-98

- Hydrogen reduction of Lunar Ilmenite
# Presentation: 140147

## Virtual Impactor for Sub-micron Aerosol Particles

**Virtual Impactor for Sub-micron Aerosol Particles**

**Virtual Impactor for Sub-micron Aerosol Particles**

**  ****A. A. Boľshakov, A. W. Strawa, A. G. Hallar **
**NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035**
** ****abolshakov@arc.nasa.gov,   astrawa@arc.nasa.gov,   ahallar@arc.nasa.gov**

**Aerosol Optical Properties via Cavity Ring-Down Technology**

**0893**

-      We have developed a virtual impactor to _concentrate aerosol_ particles of known sizes for the purpose of calibrating the optical cavity ring-down instrument designed to measure extinction and scattering of atmospheric aerosols. No such low-flow virtual impactors for sub-micron particles are commercially available.
-      Our virtual impactor features two separable concentric parts: the _nozzle_ and the _probe_. An internal diameter ratio of the probe to the nozzle was selected as 0.742:0.55 mm. The particles’ 50%- cut-off diameters, characteristic for our virtual impactor were between 500 and 900 nm depending on the flow rates used.
-      Performance of our virtual impactor was evaluated in an experimental set-up using a scanning mobility particle size spectrometer. An aqueous suspension of solid polystyrene latex spheres was aspirated through the nebulizer to generate aerosol standards. Aerosol sample flow rates after passing the virtual impactor were in a range of 0.1–0.3 *l/min*. The particle size profiles exhibited a broad maximum of moisture particles at ~100 nm and a narrow peak of monodisperse polystyrene spheres of one of the specified standard sizes at 500, 700, or 900 nm.
-      Under experimental conditions optimized for the best performance of the virtual impactor, we were able to concentrate the 700-nm polystyrene particles _no less than 15-fold_. However, under experimental conditions optimized for calibrating our cavity ring-down instrument, a concentration factor attained was 4 to 5. During calibration experiments, maximum realized particle number densities were 190, 300 and 1600 cm-3 for the 900-nm, 700-nm and 500-nm spheres, respectively.

- Example:
# Presentation: 710234

## Measuring Return on Investment:Comparing Apples to Oranges(or at least Macintosh to Granny Smith)

- Yael Harris, PhD, MHS
- Senior Policy Analyst
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

## A Quick Review of the Literature

- $339,662 total annual savings in practice of 28 MDs using EHRs- **Grieger, Cohen, Krusch, 2007**
- Estimated net benefit of using EMR over 5 year period: $86,400 per physician- **Wang, Middleton, Prosser, et. al., 2003**
- Nationwide savings of $21.3 billion within 5 years of 90% adoption- **Hillestad, Bigelow, Bower et. al. 2005**
- Use of EMRs can result in poorer quality (and possibly higher overall costs as a result)- **Linder et. al. 2007**

## What are we measuring?

- Electronic Administrative Record?
- Computerized Physician Order Entering?
- E-labs?
- Medication Management?
- Clinical Decision Support?

## A Plea for a Standardized Definition

- ONC funded study by George Washington /Harvard
- What constitutes an Electronic Health Record (EHR)
- How to measure adoption

## Results

- 4 Functionalities
- Electronic notes
- Electronic ordering of lab tests
- Electronic receipt of lab results
- Electronic ordering of medications

## So, What is Current Adoption Rate?

- 9.2% for physician offices
- Rate much lower for small and solo practices
- Rate lower in rural areas
- Highest rates in New England

## Ongoing Measurement

- 2007 Comprehensive survey of adoption
- Identify types of practices that have adopted
- Identify practices planning to adopt
- Identify barriers
- Identify cost tradeoffs
- 2008 & going forward- National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMC)

## So, is there a return on investment?

- Technology type
- “Adoption” of EHR
- Practice size
- Time since implementation
- Start up costs

## Questions?

- Yael Harris
- 202-205-3628
- Yael.harris@hhs.gov
# Presentation: 858640

## Four Roads to the neutrino magnetic moment

-  Traditional:   e cross section
-  Čerenkov Radiation
-  Transition Radiation
-  Resonant Cavities

## Origin of the Magnetic Moment

-  Actually, the “effective moment”		  μeff = (μ2+d2)1/2
-  also R-parity violating SUSY
-  limited to <10-10 μB ...expected 109 smaller yet
- If neutrinos are massive, then to first order, μ linearly dependent on neutrino mass (?)

- c.f.: Lee and Shrock,PRD 16 1444 (1977)or                                        Marciano and Sanda,Phys Lett 67B 303 (1977)

## Road One:The  e cross section

- Traditional approach followed by NuMu, HELLAZ, etc.  SM:  EM:

- c.f.: Miranda, Segura, Semikoz, and Valle,
- hep-ph/9906328

## Calculation of  e cross section

- High neutrino E does not help
- Quadratic dependence on mag moment
- Need a dedicated detector...yet can’t do much better than others

## Road 2:Čerenkov Radiation

- K.McF. :   1 km long water tank...
- Quadratic in μ
- Numerical calculation for 2E20: 0.00033 photons per year...

- c.f. Grimus and Neufeld,Phys Lett B315 129 (1993)

## Road 3:Transition Radiation

- From solar neutrino calculationsc.f. Grimus and Neufeld hep-ph 9410245
- Still quadratic in μ...
- Numerical calculation for 2E20, 1E6 foils:4.5E-5 X-ray photons per year          This is a hard calculation!The conversion factors are not small...nonetheless this should be the final answer for given input

- Several approximations here...

## Small Adjustments, big gains?

- Small gains from ωp in standard materials. (?)We don’t have the usual limits a TRD would have.Still prefer to avoid X-ray attenuation i.e. high Z materials.
- Lowering X-ray detection threshold from 20 keVto 5 keV gives you a factor of 100        ...but low efficiency in real detectors
- Originally I was looking at a big reactor...2 meters away     ...I think I still am.

## Road 4:The Resonant Cavity

- Essentially a low-energy photon target
- Stimulate radiative decays
- Rotate neutrinos to sterile statesby introducing a relative phase to the helicity components...thus reducing the event rate at a detector when the cavity is powered-up.
- *NOT* quadratic in μ!

- Thanks Fritz DeJongh
- C.f.: Vannucci, hep-ex 9911025

- I haven’t thoughtabout this yet...

## Resonant Cavity     ...the only remaining option?

- It’s at least as attractive as the others!
- There exists a CERN proposal for this one.(Vanucci: “Achievable limits”)
- Does not require a dedicated detector
- Detector systematics cancel

## Four Difficult Roads...

- I recommend the traditional search only if it comes for free.
- Čerenkov is out
- TR looks bad, at least at NuFact             Any ideas are welcome!
- More to come on ResCav
# Presentation: 914880

## Climate Database Modernization Program (CDMP)

**Marine Tasks**

- Joe Elms
- Program Manager

## NOAA’s Climate Database Modernization Program (CDMP)

- Primary Goal: Digitize and preserve historical climate and environmental data and make them easily accessible via the Internet

- 50 NOAA tasks supported by CDMP FY 2005 funding

- Task Selection based on an Annual Proposal Process

## CDMP Current Status

- CDMP has three primary Conversion Contractors
-  Current contracts end either February or March 2006
-  CDMP FY 06 budget  is not yet known
-  CDMP Data Access Workshop November 15-16, 2005

##         CDMP Marine Activities

-  Canadian Marine
-  WMO Publication 47
-  Incoming Marine Records  - VOS & Navy
-  German Maury
-  US Maury
-  Lightship Observations
-  NOS & Fisheries data
-  Simultaneous Ship Observations
-  NOS Coastal Charts
-  Early European Ship Logs

##                 WSSRD LOGIN: user name/password required

**                ****WSSRD LOGIN: user name/password required**

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Incoming Records:

- 	US Navy Forms
- 	VOS Forms
- 	             Approximately 120K obs/yr
- Canadian Marine (1992 - 2005 )
- 	VOS Forms
- 	Canadian Navy Forms
- 		242K obs keyed
- All of these data should flow to the Global Collecting Centers

## Maury Collections

- German Maury Collection:
-  870 logbooks; 20945 images in the Collection
-  Keying format has been prepared for the 1st series
-  logbook selection and keying software being developed

- US Maury Collection:
-  Keyed in China
-  69904 images in the Collection on WSSRD
-  Original manuscript Inventory imaged (88 reels) from NARA

## WMO Pub 47

- 1955-1972 (15 volumes; 2920 pages)
- Keying format developed
- 1st pilot test produced

- 1955 Ed.

- 1972 Ed.

## Additional Marine Data Collections

-  Fisheries deck log data from SeaCat Bongo cruises          	(1985-2000; 32,958 records)

-  Lightship Observations:
- 	 NCDC holdings (  14 lightships; 1936-1983 )
- 	 NARA holdings (1891-1971)

-  Simultaneous Meteorological Observations on Ships  (1874-1902)

## NOS Shoreline Charts

- Approximately 75% of the 14,000 T-Sheets have been vectorized

- The vector data are accessible from the NOAA Shoreline Data Explorer web site:_[http://](http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/newsys_ims/shoreline/index.cfm)__[www.ngs.noaa.gov/newsys_ims/shoreline/index.cfm](http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/newsys_ims/shoreline/index.cfm)_The raster data are available from the IMC Coastal Data Explorer web site:_[http://](http://coastalexplorer.imcwv.com/)__[coastalexplorer.imcwv.com](http://coastalexplorer.imcwv.com/)__[/](http://coastalexplorer.imcwv.com/)_

## Early European Ship Logbooks

-  Workshop at NCDC in Aug 2004
-  UK  & Other European Collections
-  Determine what is available
-  Identify funding
-  Image and keying
-  Quality Control and merging

## Any  Questions?
# Presentation: 547710

## Quality Control Exercise

- Level 1

- Level 2

**Mean**

**+1SD**

**+2SD**

**+3SD**

**-1SD**

**-2SD**

**-3SD**

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

## Level 1

- Level 2

- 1 2s Rule = “Warning”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

## Level 1

- Level 2

- 1 3s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- 1 2s Rule = “Warning”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- 2 2s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- 2 2s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- R-4s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- 4 1s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- Level 1

- Level 2

- 4 1s Rule = “Reject Run”

- Level 1

- Level 2
# Presentation: 485744

##    Greek Theatre

- Effective 11/3/08

_**Key**_
-  Bus Stop

-    Greek Theatre

- -   **Cyclotron Rd.**

-  **Centennial Dr.**

**Gayley Road**

-  **Hearst Ave**

***UCB East Gate**

- BART Bus stop on **Shattuck Ave ** between Center and Addison
- Blue Bus towards 65
- Orange Bus towards 74

**Connecting bus to lab at Bart**

***717 Potter Street**
- Front door

- JBEI Emery Station East
- 5885 Hollis St. Emeryville Bus stop on **Hollis cross St. 59****th**
- Southwest Corner

***AC Bus Stop Shelter**

**Blackberry Gate  65**

**Strawberry Gate 74**

- Orange & Green Bus towards 74

**Shattuck Ave**

**Addison  **

**Center  **
# Presentation: 692495

## MAP

- Tracey Pratt
- Liverpool University

-  Introduction/Overview of MAP
-  How to submit jobs
-  Present labeling conventions
-  Filesizes/Job duration
-  Diskspace
-  Flexibility of MAP
-  Outlook for MAP + CDF
-  Thanks

- Dec 2003

## Multi-Array Processor

- 224 operational nodes * 400MHz processors
- +30 to come
- At present successfully running jobs using:
-  cdfSim,
-  ProductionExe,
-  runMC,
-  stnutple_prod.exe/stnuple.exe
- Present code version 4.9.1

## Overview of how MAP works

- Tar working directory

- Output copied to matrix

- Tar is sent to compass node

- Tar distributed to all nodes

- Job executed on all nodes

- Produced files are returned at end of job

- Output on hep52-57
- (compass node)

- Submit job via mapxqs

- Job requested

- Data to be analysed

## How to submit jobs

- At present via me!
- 1) First test on cdfjif1 and see if your job works
- 2) Then tell me:
- tcl for simulation (FakeEv/Pythia/Herwig)
- # events
- executables to be used:  cdfSim/			ProductionExe / runMC/ stntuple_prod.exe
- version to be generated (5.2.0 etc)
- return files requested

- Status of jobs and where to find data at:
- http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/~tracey/map.html

## MAP labeling convention

- 224 operational nodes arranged with
- 	30 processors per rack
- labeling convention:
- map0201=1st     map0301=31st ...  map0601=120th ... map0901=210st map0201=2nd   map0302 =32nd ...
- ...
- map0230=30th ... 				      map0930=240th
- This is to be reviewed, and files numbered 1, 2....etc.

- To understand output numbers!

## Filesizes and Job duration

| Event type | MB per event | Time per event |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Z  ee  | 165 kB | 45 s (runMC) |
| Single photons |   87 kB | 4.2 s (cS+Pro+stn) |

- 40min~1 hour overhead – staggered start on 120 nodes
-           ~1 hour overhead – staggered start on 224 nodes

- So per day (24 hours) could make ~ 1840 Zee events
- 					  300 MB

## Disk Space

- Present disk space
- 3 x 500 MB = 1.5 TB
- 1 x  1.8 TB  = 1.8 TB
- 	         = 3.3 TB
- To add
- 2 x   1.8 TB = 3.6 TB  (hep58 and 59)

- Issues – storage space – now if empty
- 51-56 500 MB = 3TB (53,55,56 not available)
- 57-59 1.8 TB *3 = 5.4 TB (58+59 not on)
- In use: 1.5 TB +1.8 TB , 1.8 TB*2 to come soon!
- Capability per year

## Flexibility with MAP

- Width

- Mass (GeV)

- generate different mass and width on each node    in one job submission
- And name files!

- 300

- 400

- 200

- K/MPL 0.1

- 0.2

- 0.3

## Outlook

- Continuous improvements being made
- 	e.g. labelling from 1224 with record of node
- 	add in the extra nodes
- 	increase disk space available
- 	update code versions available

- Produce CDF MC data needed for Liverpool (CDF) analyses

- Aim:

## to Tony!

- Thanks

## The End!!
# Presentation: 483238

## Collective effects in EDM storage ring

- A.Sidorin,
- Electron cooling group,
- JINR, Dubna

## The ring parameters
Beam emittance and tune shift
Optimum particle number
Intrabeam scattering in EDM ring

- Beam emittance and tune shift
- Optimum particle number
- Intrabeam scattering in EDM ring

## Ya. K. Semertzidis, 13 January 

- Ya. K. Semertzidis, 13 January

## The ring and beam parameters

| Circumference, m | 25.798564 |
| --- | --- |
| Transition gamma | 1 (p = 1) |
| Betatron tunes hor/vert | 0.650014/ 1.183 |
| Mean beta-functions hor/vert, m | 6.924971348/ 3.805011264 |
| Mean dispersion, m | 10.65357261 |
| Deuteron momentum, GeV/c | 1.5 |
| RF harmonic number | 40 (~360 MHz) |
| Total number of particles | 1012 |
| Number of particles in bunch | 2.51010 |

## Resonance method of deuteron EDM measurement (Yu. Orlov)

- The deuteron velocity is modulated with the spin rotation frequency

- In average the vertical component of spin
- increases in time proportionally to the EDM:

## Bunch parameters

- M. Blaskiewicz

| Rms momentum spread | 3.510-3 |
| --- | --- |
| Rms bunch length, cm | 8.11 |
| Effective RF voltage, MV | 1500 |
| Bunching factor (Imean/Imax) | 0.4 |

## Beam emittance and tune shift

| 95% emittances mmmrad hor/vert | 90/90 |
| --- | --- |
| Rms emittances mmmrad hor/vert | 15/15 |
| Tune shift hor=vert | 0.0155 |

**Maximum tune-shift**
**for a Gaussian distribution,**
**where ******** is 95% emittance**

## Limitations for tune shift

- Betatron motion stability (*Q*  0.1)
- Coherent stability (                               )

- As in usual rings:

- To exclude general systematic errors:
- Fast modulation of the vertical betatron frequency,
- one half of the beam is operated at tune

- Peculiarity of EDM experiment:

## Optimum particle number

## Intrabeam scattering in EDM ring

- Ring is operated over transition energy
- Large mean dispersion
- Large variations of beta function

- D=0
- z =0

- Alfredo Luccio

- n = 1

## Heating rates

- Collision integrals in PRF

- Bjorken-Mtingwa
- theory

## Over transition energy

- FOM for IBS

## Initial growth rates (BETACOOL program, Martini model)

| 1/x, s-1 | 0.002189304497 |
| --- | --- |
| 1/y, s-1 | 9.221239402E-6 |
| 1/z, s-1 | 7.765313344E-6 |

## Conclusions

- Tune spread is limited mainly by method used for systematic correction
- Tune spread and particle number define the beam emittance
- Depolarization time depends on the emittance and optimum particle number is determined by statistics
- Increase of emittance leads to increase of price
- At optic design FOM for IBS has to be minimized
# Presentation: 501057

## WAN eXpansion (WANX) Project

- NISN Quarterly Teleconference
- January 26, 2009
- Mike Turner

## Agenda

**Agenda**

- What is WANX Project?
- Current Status
- Who is the Project Team?

## What is the WANX Project?

**What is the WANX Project?**

- The WAN eXpansion (WANX) project is a bandwidth augmentation to the successful WANR implementation
- Core bandwidth with be increased from existing 2.5Gbps lambdas to 10Gbps lambdas
- Multiple regional circuits will be enhanced from OC-12 to 2.5Gbps lambdas or from OC-3 to OC-12
- Options are being explored to add IV&V and VAFB to the regional circuit design (Networx dependent)
- There could be a couple of equipment changes, but the overall architecture will remain the same
- MPLS Fast Re-Route (FRR) will be utilized in the backbone architecture instead of RPR
- Similar performance characteristics to RPR in core
- Improved performance characteristics within the regions

## What is the WANX Project?

**What is the WANX Project?**

- Multiple requirements have driven the need to upgrade the network
- High End Computing
- Constellation
- MCDTV enhancements
- General network growth
- In addition to the backbone circuit growth, several Center LAN interface will be upgraded as well:
- MSFC and JSC will be upgraded to 10GE
- ARC, GSFC, and LaRC are already upgraded to 10GE

## WANX Proposed Topology

**WANX Proposed Topology**

**Core**
**Lambda Services**

- 10 Gbps lambda

- 2.5 Gbps lambda

- SONET OC12 (622 Mbps)

- SONET OC3 (155 Mbps)

- MAF

## Where are we?

**Where are we?**

- WANX is currently going through the Project Management (NPR 7120.7) cycle
- Funding has been committed to implement both circuits and equipment
- Circuit procurement is dependant on Networx evaluation and selection
- Proof of concept testing is currently being completed in the NISN Operational Support Laboratory
- Necessary documentation is currently being developed to quickly meet critical project milestones in a short period of time:
- System Requirements Review (Project Plan, Requirements Document)
- Preliminary Design Review (POC Testing, Design Document)
- Critical Design Review (SAT testing plan, Final Design Document)

## Who is the Project Team?

**Who is the Project Team?**

- NASA Civil Service Team:
- Carol Bryant is the Project Manager
- UNITeS Team:
- Michael Turner / Chris Knoell are the Project Managers
- Scott Johnson is the lead engineer
- Jim Good / Shawn Kelly are currently running all testing scenarios
# Presentation: 575053

## The Proton Source (mostly Booster) in the “Collider Era”

*Eric Prebys*
- February 3, 2003

## Lattice Measurement Status

- Ran Shekhar’s old program during studies.
- Program varies one trim over several (~10) values and measures all 96 BPM’s at 11 times for each one.
- With modern BPM system, it takes ~1 hr to do full measurement with Booster @ 1/5sec.
- Have written new (C++) tools to read in the files and fit the dependencies. (96*96*11=101376 individual correlation constants).
- My short term goal is to get these into the closed orbit program.
- Will translate to a Root file (OK?), or Ntuple
- Also use to fit for lattice parameters, study dogleg effects, etc.

## Example Data

## Agenda

- Resonance Scans: Spentz
- Chromaticity Measurements (AC and DC): Ray
- Effects of Dogleg and ORBUMP: Milorad?
- 200 Mhz injection overlap: Milorad
- DC acceptance and ORBUMP painting: Weiren
- Lattice Measurement: Eric
- Beam Extinction: Eric
- Gamma-t: Chuck?
- Aborted beam IPM studies: Bill
# Presentation: 460888

##  PMDB

** ****PMDB**

**Limit Setting**

## LEVELS OF STRESS

| Stress Level | Staff Action |
| --- | --- |
| Moderate Stress | Verbal Intervention |
| Severe Stress | Limit Setting |
| Panic | Personal Safety Skills or Therapeutic Containment |
| Tension Reduction | Therapeutic Rapport |

## Therapeutic Verbal Interventions

- Using silence
- Accepting
- Giving recognition
- Offering self
- Giving broad openings
- Asking open ended questions

## Therapeutic Verbal Interventions

- Placing event in time or sequence
- Making observations
- Encouraging descriptions of perceptions
- Encouraging comparison
- Restating

## Therapeutic Verbal Interventions

- Reflecting
- Focusing
- Exploring
- Giving information
- Seeking clarification
- Presenting reality
- Voicing doubt
- Seeking consensual validation

## Therapeutic Verbal Interventions

- Verbalizing the implied
- Encouraging evaluation
- Attempting to translate into feelings
- Suggesting collaboration
- Summarizing
- Encouraging formulation of a plan of action

## SEVERE LEVEL OF STRESS

- Perceptual Field Limited
- Focused on One Thing
- Tunnel Vision
- Processing of Information Severely Limited

**SELF**

***SOUND***

***SMELL***

***TASTE***

***TOUCH***

***VISION***

## SIGNS OF ESCALATION

**Threats to Others**
**Increasingly Loud / Boisterous Behavior**
**Begins to Lose Control**
**Harmful or Dangerous Behavior**
**Violation of Policy or Procedures**

## LIMIT SETTING

**Clear / Calm**
**Non-Threatening**
**Encouraging**
**Enforceable**
***Person may need time to process the information***
***Directions may need to be repeated***

## LIMIT SETTING

**Firm Yet Supportive**
**Simple and Direct**
**Describe Desired Behavior**
**Appropriate to Situation**
**Progressive in Nature**

## By Enforcing Consequences, Staff Provide a Structure for Future Learning

## AVOID POWER STRUGGLES

## Limit Setting Summary

**Use when more control is needed**
**Should be appropriate to circumstances**
** ****Be clear, direct and supportive**
**Show respect for others**
**Give options if possible**
**State consequences if necessary**
**Seek to maintain personal dignity and therapeutic relationships**

## PANIC LEVEL OF STRESS

**Perceptual Field Very Narrow**
**Unable to Process Information**
**Unable to Problem Solve**
**Dangerous to Self or Others**

## INTERVENTIONS FOR ACTING OUT PERSON

**Personal Safety Skills**
**Therapeutic Containment**

## LEVELS OF STRESS

| Stress Level | Staff Action |
| --- | --- |
| Moderate Stress | Verbal Intervention |
| Severe Stress | Limit Setting |
| Panic | Personal Safety Skills or Therapeutic Containment |
| Tension Reduction | Therapeutic Rapport |

## TENSION REDUCTION

*Touch*

**  ****Returning to Normal **
**  ****Perceptual Field is Keen**
**  ****Taking in Information**
**  ****Returning to Normal – **
**  ****Takes Time**
# Presentation: 076836

## NETWORK Chief Logistics Officers

- Frederick Downs Jr., Chief Prosthetics/Clinical Logistics Officer

## Slide 2

|  VISN # | CLONAME & TITLE  | ADDRESS | PHONE | FAX |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | James Gunn | VAMC Bedford
200 Springs Road
Bedford, MA  01730 | 781-275-7500 |  |
| 2 | Mark Fontaine-Westhart | VA HealthCare Network 
VISN 2
113 Holland Avenue, Bldg 7
Albany, NY 12208 | 518-626-7316 | 518-626-7316 |
| 3 | John A. DeCaprio | VAMC Bronx  
130 West Kingsbridge Road 
Bronx, NY 10468 | 718-584-9000 
Ext# 6434 | 718-741-4704 |
| 4 | G. Michael Miller | VAMC Wilkes-Barre 
1111 E. End Blvd 
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 | 570-821-7219 | 570-821-7235 |
| 5 | Victor Heinrich | VA Capitol HealthCare Network
VISN 5
849 International Drive, Suite 275
Linthicum, MD  21090 | 410-691-7774 | 410-691-7779 |
| 6 | Augustin A. Davila | 300 W. Morgan Street 
Durham, NC  | 919-956-5541 | 919-956-7152 |
| 7 | Dean Harrell | VAMC Dublin  
1826 Veterans Blvd 
Dublin, GA 31021 | 478-274-5525 |  |

## Slide 3

| 8 | Scott Curit | VA Sunshine Healthcare Network
10000 Bay Pines Blvd. 
Bay Pines, FL 33708 | 727-319-1294 | 727-319-1135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9 | Pamela J. McGuire | VAMC Alvin C. York  
3400 Lebanon Pike 
Murfreesboro, TN 37129 | 615-867-5426 | 615-867-5429 |
| 10 | Ken E. Williams | VAMC Chillicothe  
17273 Street, Route 104 
Chillicothe, OH 45601 | 740-773-1141 
Ext# 7007 | 740-772-7008 |
| 11 | Karla Sandell | PO Box 134002 
Ann Arbor, MI 48113 | 734-930-5967 |  |
| 12 | Harlan J. Rochon | VA Great Lake Acq. Center (GLAC) 
5000 W. National Avenue 
Milwaukee, WI 53295 | 414-902-5452 | 414-902-5540 |
| 15 | Stan E. Vest | 4101 S. 4th Street 
Leavenworth, KS 66048 | 913-758-4104 | 913-785-4190 |
| 16 | Cynthia L. Due | S.Central VA Hlth.Care Network
1600 E. Woodrow Wilson Drive
Third Flr. Suite A  Jackson MS | 601-364-7930 | 601-364-7996 |

## Slide 4

| 17 | Hugo Marcade | Central Texas Veterans HC 
1901 Veterans Memorial Drive 
Temple, TX 76504 | 254-743-2131 | 254-771-4508 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18 | Jimmy R. Woodring | 6001 S. Power Rd.
Bldg 237
Mesa, AZ  85206-0910 |  602-277-5551
Ext# 3408 | 602-222-2686 |