# Presentation: 251749

## Recommendations

***Recommendations***
***Ward Plummer***
***Washington, D. C.***
***December 11, 2000***

## Findings

**It is imperative that every  spallation source in the U.S. is utilized to its full potential***** ***to assure that a sufficiently large and well-trained user community exists when SNS is fully operational in ~2008.
** ****It is essential to substantially increase the neutron user community** in order to fully exploit the SNS.  This will not occur in a timely fashion without an active program.
**IPNS is an extremely reliable**** ****source with a talented and experienced staff.****  ** However, the facilities (source and some instruments) are in need of improvements to make them more competitive and to maintain reliability.
**LANSCE/Lujan Center has a competitive source, and the facility could be world-class***.**  * However, the governance is dysfunctional, and the management scheme is not compatible with effective stewardship and operation of a national user facility.

## Slide 3

## Recommendations—IPNS

**‰*****Immediately enhance activities at the IPNS facility***
- The timely realization of the enhancement of the source, the instrument suite, and the level of scientific exploitation of IPNS are essential to the ongoing development of the user base in the ramp-up to the SNS.  The Subpanel’s recommendations are
- Invest to maintain the excellent reliability
- Invest to enhance the IPNS source and instrumentation
- Expand operation of the user program to 30 weeks per year
- Strengthen scientific programs at ANL that develop the user base and scientific agenda for the SNS
- Explore the possibility of developing and operating first-class instruments at IPNS that can later be moved to SNS
- Deliverables:  increased visibility of neutron scattering in the materials research community, seeding a broad user base in academia (namely those cognizant of the value of neutron scattering techniques), building a new generation of instrument scientists, and the testing and operation of new instrument technologies for the SNS.
- Estimated cost is an additional $9M/year.

## IPNS Budget

***Data Rate Gains from Instrument Enhancements***

***Proposed Budget for Enhancements***

## IPNS Instruments

**Now  -- useful research tools**

**Recommendation **** competitive**

**x 5**

**x 9**

**x 6**

**x 2**

**(x 32)**

**x 2**

**x 9**

**x 3**

**x 6**

**x 12**

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- World-Class Science

## Recommendations—LANSCE/Lujan Center

- ‰***	******Restructure LANSCE/Lujan Center to deliver an internationally competitive user facility***
- In order to render LANSCE/Lujan Center a viable user center in time to generate the needed impact for the SNS ramp-up in 2006–2008, the governance and management of LANSCE/Lujan Center must be fundamentally restructured by April 2001.  The committee recommends implementation of the Cooperative Stewardship governance model as described in the National Research Council (NRC) 1999 report on this topic which stated that “Responsibility for design, construction, operation, maintenance, and upgrading of each facility core should rest with a single clearly identified federal agency—the steward.”
-   The desired deliverables are:
**A single Steward of this facility must be appointed, incorporating all the different DOE offices and UC.  The Steward is charged with single-point budget, policy, and priority responsibility.  **
**This Steward shall deliver an adequately funded actionable implementation plan for FY 2002, sustainable over the period 2002–2008, to generate a fully functional user facility, competitive with international benchmarks (e.g., ISIS).  **
**The plan must specify a ramp-up schedule for LANSCE/Lujan to fully functional status by FY 2003 in time to impact the SNS ramp-up in 2006.**
**A fully functional neutron facility should have increased the LANSCE/Lujan user base to ~1000 by 2006.**

## Stewardship—LANSCE/Lujan Center

*LANSCE/Lujan Center could be established as an NNSA national user facility using a governance model that maps directly from the recommendations of the NAS Cooperative Stewardship report.  The UC system should have a major role in the governance to maintain the proper balance between internal Lab pressures from the Nuclear Weapons side and external pressures from the R&D communities.*

## Lujan Center Instruments

**Now**

**Potential**

- World Class Instrument

## Recommendations—Expanding the University Base for Neutron Scattering 

**‰*****Establish a program to expand the university base for neutron scattering***
- An immediate injection of funds is recommended for development of an enhanced user community, poised to fully exploit the SNS on commissioning in 2006. The recommended mechanisms are
- Well-funded facility-based user programs
- Joint University–Neutron Scattering Facility partnerships
- Development of a National Agenda for Enhancement of Neutron Scattering Research in the U.S**.**
- Strengthening the National Laboratory Neutron Scattering Groups
- The desired deliverable is a three- to fourfold increase in the academic user base by the time SNS is functional.