BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 703072

## Research on Mathematics Education

- Grover J. (Russ) Whitehurst, Ph.D.
- Director
- Institute of Education Sciences
- United States Department of Education

**Archived Information**

## Achievement

## NAEP 2000 Proficiency

## TIMSS Math 1995

## Declared Major

- 4-year colleges

- %

## Tracking and Grouping

## Assessment for Instruction

## Structured Peer Feedback

## The Math Wars

| Constructivist Approaches | Skills-based Approaches |
| --- | --- |
| Knowledge is constructed | Knowledge is imparted |
| Children should develop their own understanding | Children should master standard facts & concepts |
| Authentic problems | Skill-relevant problems |
| Intrinsically motivated | Extrinsically motivated |

## Conceptual Understanding

## Decimal Fractions

- 509 > 7
- .509 < .7

## Decimal Fractions

- 0.509
- ____________________

-  0

-  1

- ?

## Checks on Constructivism

- Many routes to understanding
- Limits on working memory
- Inefficiency of discovery
- Role of work in learning

## Slide 14

## Curriculum

## Constructivist Math – 3 States

## Implementation

## Slide 18

## Alignment

## 4th Grade Math Gains: 1992 to 2000

- NAEP

**Notes:**
Teachers should be evaluated based on the only measure that really matters: whether their pupils are learning. This is not pie in the sky. William Sanders of the University of Tennessee has developed a technique that uses careful statistical analysis to identify the gains that students make during a school year and then estimate the effects of individual teachers on student progress. This "value-added" technique is extremely precise and its results are statistically robust. Originally used only in Tennessee but now spreading to other locales, it allows policymakers, taxpayers, and parents to see for themselves how much teachers are helping students to learn.12The technique has proven to be a powerful tool for evaluating teachers. Sanders finds, for example, that the top 20 percent of teachers boost the scores of low-achieving pupils by 53 percentile points on average, while the bottom 20 percent of teachers produce gains of only 14 percentile points. Researchers in Dallas and Boston have found the same commonsensical link: good teachers significantly boost student achievement, even for the weakest pupils.13 

## Elements of State Math Reforms

- State-wide standards
- Linked state-wide assessments
- Accountability for results

## Putting It Together

## Slide 23

| Classroom-based assessment | + |
| --- | --- |
| Structured peer feedback | + |
| Tracking | - |
| Understanding | + |
| Direct instruction | + - ? |
| Discovery | + - ? |
| Authentic problems | + - ? |
| Work and practice | +  |
| Curriculum | ? |
| Implementation | + |
| System alignment | + |
# Presentation: 266479

## Troubleshooting Guide

**and **
**Sensor measurements**

- Guillermo López Hinojosa
- August 8, 2004

## D0  is an international collaboration of university scientists

**D0  is an international collaboration of university scientists**
**and students from 19 nations who operate one of the two **
**main detectors in Fermilab.**

## D0 Detector

**D0 Detector**

## Silicon Microstrip Tracker Design

**792576 channels are being read out by 6192 svxIIe chips on 912 read **
**out modules (HDI)**

## Barrels

**Barrels**

## Different types of Silicon modules

- L3

- L6

- n-side

- p-side

- L9

- n-side

- L9

- p-side

- H6

- F6

- F6

- n-side

- p-side

- L6

**Different types of Silicon modules**

## Double sided devices

**Double sided devices**

*Al*

**Read out**

## Troubleshooting Guide

## The detector is operated from a Control Room located in the 

**The detector is operated from a Control Room located in the **
**first floor of the D0 Assembly Building.**

## The SMT shifter is in charge of monitoring the

**performance of the Silicon Tracker. **

##    The shifter relies on a manual that gives the 

**    ****procedures needed to monitor the SMT.**

**   ****Usually fast and concrete answers are required.**

**   ****A Troubleshooting Guide was needed.**

## The Troubleshooting Guide 

**consists of simple flow charts **
**which give the shifter precise **
**and clear information on what **
**to do when certain situations **
**appear.**

## Sensor measurements

## The test stand simulates physical 

**events, so that sensors and **
**electronic equipment can be **
**tested.**

## Spread sheet used to analyze data

**Spread sheet used to analyze data**

## Slide 16

## Interface board

- VRB

- Interface board

## Problem

**   ****Some sensors are too noisy.**

**   ****The reasons for this noise are under study.**

## Objective

**Find noise changes as a function of humidity**
**(Dependence of humidity on grassy noise)**

## Collaboration

**   ****We constructed a device that could simulate certain **
**    ****physical conditions.**
**   ****The test of data acquisition are in progress.**

## A box was built so that the sensor could be tested

**A box was built so that the sensor could be tested**

**Flow meters**

**Bubbler**

## Silicon Sensor 

**Silicon Sensor **

**HDI**

## The wedges are not downloading correctly inside 

**the box.**

**The box could be causing damage.**

**Some wire bonds are loose.**

## When some HDI’s are not working properly the shifter disables them.

- Some of them are enabled again.

- How many times the HDI’s were enabled for a specific crate?

## Conclusions

**The box needs to be evaluated by the experts.**

**More tests need to be done.**

**The Troubleshooting Guide will be used and updated**
**according to the shifter’s necessities.**
# Presentation: 425268

## Slide 1

## Supervision And Support:The Key To Program Success

- Careful attention and guidance
- Continual availability to peer counselors
- Ongoing support

## Who Should Coordinate AndManage Peer Counselors?

- Most programs supervise peer counselors at the local level
- Time commitment of a supervisor varies according to number of peer counselors employed and caseload

## Designated Supervisors Are Key

## Case Scenario #1

## Mentoring Role

- Mentoring vs. supervisor role during the first six months
- Transition to “supervisor” role

## Case Scenario #2

## Case Scenario #3

## Ongoing Supervision

- Monthly staff meetings
- Ongoing communications
- Weekly activity reports

## Alaska WIC and other programs use electronic communications to keep staff connected.  Electronic listservs can be used to share program information, practice counseling scenarios, and brainstorm ways to manage difficult breastfeeding problems. 

## Case Scenario #4

## Other Issues

- Religious beliefs
- Language differences
- Cultural diversity
- Civil rights policies
- WIC clinic policies

## Case Scenario #5

## Confidentiality Issues

- WIC and State confidentiality policies must be taught and reinforced
- Confidentiality agreement
- Scenarios at monthly staff meetings

## Case Scenario #6

## Peer Counselor Monitoring

- Weekly/biweekly phone calls with staff
- Regular review of contact logs
- Spot checks of weekly activity reports

## Mississippi WIC includes peer counseling program monitoring as part of its overall nutrition education monitoring. 

## Reasons To DismissPeer Counselors

- Not performing job duties
- Fraud
- Inappropriate conduct for a “role model” in the community

## Supporting Your Peer Counselors

- Making referrals to peer counselors
- Supporting an active breastfeeding environment that promotes the peer counseling program
- Ongoing communication through
- Monthly staff meetings and clinic meetings
- Access to lactation consultants
- Regular contact with supervisor
- Affirmation

## “Peer counselors need support because they are supporting these mothers. They are going through a lot of difficult changes and life situations, and they need the same type of nurturing they are asked to provide to the clients.”

- Peer Counselor Coordinator
*“**They need lots and lots of affirmation. It’s very demoralizing to sit and call 25 women in a row and have every one of those contacts be a bad experience, either be told, ‘She doesn’t live here anymore’ or ‘No, I’m not gonna do that,’ or to leave a message, leave a message, leave a message...but no one ever returns your call.” *
- 				Peer Counselor Coordinator

## Respecting And EmpoweringPeer Counselors

- Childcare difficulties
- Can your clinic allow small infants in arms to accompany their moms to the clinic setting?
- Can monthly peer counselor staff meetings be held outside the clinic setting?
- Financial concerns
- Transportation issues

## Slide 22
# Presentation: 142468

## Timing questions

**“****To chop or not to chop”**
**Trench test of fiber system (vs coil in oven)**
**Sector test – the copper part (local distribution, per Frank’s diagram).**
**Can we have maintenance day where we replace a local timing module, and come back up with everything phased/timed the same? So we don’t have go through and re-time everything.**
**Two-channel receiver comparator scheme to be demo’d (redundancy scheme).**
**Is there a credible low-cost way of building a vcxo with sufficient performance?**
**Look at different schemes to meet the bunch compressor requirements.**
**Demo the wavelength tuning trick over realistic temperature range.**
**Failure modes and effects analysis.**
**Pursue HOM phase detector scheme.**
**How can we take advantage of linac symmetry to reduce stability requirements?**
**Develop integrated timing system diagram**
**Develop integrated timing system requirements table**
**Develop integrated timing system master sequencer requirements.**

## Timing questions 2

**Separate local timing system (or piece) for each accelerator area, eg damping ring?**
**Is there going to be a phase ramp? Or positron trombone?**
**How do they do circumference feedback in damping ring? Has a chicane.**
**How do we deal with 60Hz (50Hz) AC line sync? 5Hz sunk to the 60Hz, with fine time set up to make positron damping ring work....**
**Does MPS timing have to be handled differently (more robust)? Tom: make whole timing system robust enough so we can use it for the MPS.**
**What is the master frequency? 13xxxxxxxx.xxHz? +/-what?**
**How do we prevent things being changed that might impact MPS? (LHC locks down all adjustable quantities)**
**Rad damage issue for fibers (probably fine for parallel tunnels)? Damping ring?**
**Need to run fibers in separate trenches (dynamite test)**
**Can we keep running (for some time) with a broken fiber (lost redundancy)?**
**Who owns what with MPS? Treaty points Ops/Controls GG, Instr TG, AGs, etc**
**What (overall) MPS topics need to get raised at higher level (chicanes, dumps, etc)?**

## General controls questions

**Where do we put UPS?**
**To what level do we have redundancy in power system?**
**Who costs the central computing servers and networks (assume Controls)**
**Where do we put machine info such as magnet field calibrations (in the ps?)**
# Presentation: 698495

## Alzheimer’s DiseaseFuture Perspectives

- Richard J. Hodes, M.D.
- Director
- National Institute on Aging
- NIA/NIH/DHHS

## Estimated Percentage of People over Age 65 with Probable Alzheimer’s Disease

- <date/time>

**Estimated Percentage of People over ****Age 65 with Probable Alzheimer’s Disease**

**Age Group**

**Percent**

- Source:  Evans D , et  al.  *JAMA* , Vol. 262, No. 18, 1989.

## Older Population by Age:  1910 to 2030

**(In millions)**

**4.0**

**4.9**

**6.6**

**9.0**

**12.3**

**16.6**

**20.1**

**25.5**

**31.1**

**35.0**

**39.4**

**53.2**

**69.4**

**1910**

**1920**

**1930**

**1940**

**1950**

**1960**

**1970**

**1980**

**1990**

**2000**

**2010**

**2020**

**2030**

**65-84**

**85+**

**Projected**

**Notes:**
The phenomenon of population aging is occurring in the U.S. and worldwide. The aging of the U.S. population is quite dramatic. The elderly population age 65 and older increased 11-fold in the last hundred years, to about 35 million people. During the same period, the under-65 population grew only 3-fold.
The oldest-old segment of the population is growing most rapidly. Today there are about 4 million people aged 85 and older, representing about 12 percent of the elderly in the U.S. The most recent data suggest that their numbers are expected to reach nearly 7 million by 2020 and soar to at least 19 million in 2050, at which point they would comprise about 24 percent of the elderly in the U.S. 

## Alzheimer’s Disease and Estrogen

**No Estrogen**

**AD risk with postmenopausal**
**estrogen use**

**46%**

**Estrogen**

**Less estrogen**

**More estrogen**

**Relative Risk**

**1.0**

**0.8**

**0.6**

**0.4**

**0.2**

**0**

**Notes:**

Picture from:
Toran-Allerand CD.  Mechanisms of estrogen action during neural development: mediation by interactions with the neurotrophins and their receptors?  Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology  1996; 56:169-178.

## Estrogen Replacement as Treatment for AD

- Hysterectomized women with AD received estrogen or placebo for 15 months
- Estrogen did not improve cognitive function or delay the progression of disease
- Estrogen may still be effective earlier in the disease process

- Mulnard, R., *JAMA *Vol*. *283 No. 8, 2000.

## Slide 6

## AD Prevention Trials: Estimation of Risks

- WHI study - adverse effects of estrogen/progestin: additional cases per 10,000 women per year
- 8 breast cancer
- 7 coronary heart disease
- 8 stroke
- 8 blood clots in the lungs or legs

- Risk of AD in women with MCI
- ~ 1,200 new cases per 10,000 women per year
- Risk of AD in women 65+ with a first degree relative with AD
- ~ 500 new cases per 10,000 women per year

## Funded AD Prevention and Selected Treatment Trials

**April 2002**
# Presentation: 243208

## Queue Manager syntax

- The queue manager (as implemented by Bamboo) utilizes the SSSRMAP message format v3 and the SSSRMAP Job object v3.
- The following describes the command syntax for the queue manager.

## Commands at a glance

- Submit Job
- Modify Job
- Query Job(s) or Queue
- Start Job
- Signal Job
- Cancel Job
- Suspend Job
- Resume Job
- Checkpoint Job
- Requeue Job
- Administer Server

## Submit/Modify Job

- <Request action="Submit">
- <Object>Job</Object>
- <Data>
- <Job><InitialWorkingDirectory>/clusters/scl/brett</InitialWorkingDirectory>
- <Processors>32</Processors>
- <Requested><WallDuration>300</WallDuration></Requested>
- <OutputFile>t.out</OutputFile>
- <Actor>brett</Actor>
- <GroupId>scl</GroupId>
- <Environment><Variable name="PATH">/usr/local/sss/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin</Variable></Environment><Executable parallel="false">./mpitest.sh</Executable>
- </Job>
- </Data>
- </Request>

- Both “Submit” and “Modify” actions requires a “Job” object in the Data section. In the case of a modify only the “JobId” and items to be altered need to be present.
- The response is simply success or failure.

## Query Job

- <Request action="Query">
- <Object>Job</Object>
- <Get name="JobId"></Get>
- <Get name="JobState"></Get>
- <Get name="UserId"></Get>
- <Get name="Processors"></Get>
- <Get name="Delivered"></Get>
- <Get name="Requested"></Get>
- <Get name="NodeList"></Get>
- <Where name="JobClass">active</Where>
- </Request>

## Query response

- <Response>
- <Status><Value>Success</Value><Code>000</Code>
- <Message>1 jobs found</Message></Status>
- <Count>1</Count>
- <Data type="xml">
- <Job><JobId>3396</JobId>
- <JobState>idle</JobState>
- <UserId>brett</UserId>
- <Processors>32</Processors>
- <Delivered><WallDuration>0</WallDuration><NodeCount></NodeCount></Delivered>
- <Requested><WallDuration>300</WallDuration><NodeCount></NodeCount></Requested>
- <NodeList></NodeList>
- </Job>
- </Data>
- </Response>

## Start Job

- Start job requires the “JobId” and a “NodeList”. Response is success or failure.
- <Request action="Start">
- <Object>Job</Object>
- <Data type="xml">
- <Job><JobId>23423</JobId>
- <NodeList><Node>x1</Node><Node>x2</Node></NodeList>
- </Job>
- </Data>
- </Request>

## Signal Job

- Simple unix style signals. Response contains success or failure.
- <Request action="Signal">
- <Object>Job</Object>
- <Set name="Signal">SIGTERM</Set>
- <Where name="JobId">2293</Where>
- </Request>

## Cancel/Suspend/Resume/Checkpoint

- All are simple commands requiring just a “JobId” and returning success or failure.
- <Request action="Cancel">
- <Object>Job</Object>
- <Where name="JobId">3395</Where>
- </Request>

## Authorization

- Bamboo uses the authentication information in the SSSRMAP wire protocol to establish the user id making the request. (ex. Only the owner or a manager can signal/cancel/etc a job)
# Presentation: 818321

## 3rd National Hydrologic Program Managers ConferenceKansas City, Missouri7/13/2007

**Coordination During Hazardous Spills**
- Kent Frantz, Senior Service Hydrologist
- National Weather Service Forecast Office
- Peachtree City, Georgia

## Background 

- On February 27, 2007 the weather forecast office in Peachtree City received a unique request from the  Cobb County Fire and Emergency Services in    Marietta, Georgia.
- They were updating their Local Emergency Operations Plan for Hazardous Materials. They heard that the National Weather Service would respond to ANY hazardous spills if requested. This could be for airborne contaminants or spills in or near streams, creeks or rivers.
- Their question was how do you want us to contact you and what kind of information will you be providing?

## Problem 

- Local procedures are in place at the Peachtree City office for airborne type hazardous material spills. For example, the nearest automated observation site or manual observations near the spill will be used for surface wind direction and speed. Short term model   data will be provided to the EMA Director for input into Cameo. If the spill is large and lasts long enough Hysplit can be run at HPC.
- But _NO_ local procedure has been developed for hazardous material spills near or in streams, creeks or rivers.  The customer was asking if we could provide runoff conditions and velocity data for basins in their county.
-                          Can it be done?

## Field Measurements

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Stage vs. Velocity Curve

**Stage vs. Velocity Curve**

**Flood Stage**

## Lessons Learned 

The stage/velocity regression curve was a very simple solution to a complex problem.

There was limited data from the USGS. Not all streams, creeks and rivers are monitored.

Any other ideas would be appreciated.

**The stage/velocity regression curve was a **_**very**_** simple solution to a complex problem.**
**There was limited data from the USGS. Not all streams, creeks and rivers are monitored.**
**Any other ideas would be appreciated.**

## Questions???

Contact Information:   National Weather Service
                                       Kent Frantz
                                       Senior Service Hydrologist
                                       770-486-1133 ext. 228  
                                       Kent.Frantz@noaa.gov

Office Web Site             www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc
Peachtree City, Georgia

**Contact Information:   National Weather Service**
**                                       ****Kent Frantz**
**                                       ****Senior Service Hydrologist**
**                                       ****770-486-1133 ext. 228  **
**                                       ****Kent.Frantz@noaa.gov**
**Office Web Site             **_[www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc](http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc)_
**Peachtree City, Georgia**
# Presentation: 270955

## Phone Meeting

- November 15, 2001

## Comments/Questions on 177r

- This is currently 3340
- in our model and is set
- by “bellows” seal to beam
- pipe of 50mm length and
- connected at 3390 to the
- beam pipe. Which is it?

- Is this sufficient for
- beam pipe support?

- Is seal to beam pipe
- here possible?

## PP1 Fiber/Pipe Numerology

- 3-hit system - per side
- Fibers
- 52+38+24 = 114x2=228 ribbons for all but B-layer
- 22x3=66 ribbons for B-layer
- 294 total ribbons per side, with 8 fibers each. 37 per octant
- Evaporative cooling pipes
- Inlets. (26+19+24)/2=35(barrel,disk)/8=5 per octant + 11(B-layer one side only)/8=2 + 32/2=16(service panels)/8 =  2 per octant. Is 5+2+2=9 per octant total.
- Outlets the same. 9 per octant
- Nitrogen tubes
- 2 per side
- 2-hit system - per side
- Fibers
- 52+16 =68 x2=136 ribbons for all but B-layer
- 22x3=66 ribbons for B-layer
- 202 total ribbons per side, with 8 fibers each. 26 per octant
- Evaporative cooling pipes
- Inlets. (26+16)/2=21(barrel,disk)/8=3 per octant + 11(B-layer one side only)/8=2 + 32/2=16(service panels)/8 =  2per octant. Is 3+2+2=7 per octant total.
- Outlets the same. 7 per octant
- Nitrogen tubes
- 2 per side
- Currently designing for 3-hit PP1, even if only used for 2-hit system initially.

## PP1 Design Status - I

- We have been pursuing design in which all(most) electrical connections are made using flex tails that protrude through PP1 - see below. Voltage drop will limit length of these tails. Can they be long enough? Not yet clear if this is feasible but still working.

- TOP

- BOTTOM

**Aluminum power wires with Ni/Au ends soldered to small flex tail with**
**180 pin SMT connector here**

**This flex board carries 160A and dissipates 3.5W**

**6 cm**

## PP1 Design Status II

- Commercial bulkhead fiber connectors will not fit along with pipes and slots for tails.
- Going to direct MT-to-MT connections reduces fiber connection area by factor of about 4. Pipes + slots will then fit but need to hold MT connectors and clips. Have to prototype to believe. Have asked Taiwan(no reply yet) and may proceed in parallel with own tests.
- Nothing new on pipe feedthroughs.
- Alternative of passing through cables with connectors outside, next step is to estimate cross section. Not obvious this fits either, tails much smaller in cross section.
# Presentation: 670030

## D0 Weekly Summary: April 7th to April 13th 

- Delivered Luminosity and operating efficiency
- Delivered 5.4pb-1
- Recorded 4.4pb-1 (82%)
- Number of “hardware/software failures” has been more then during typical week
- Down to ~82% efficiency from typical ~85%
- Total number of events collected
- 10 mln
- All events have been reconstructed on the farms (plus ~8 mln from December data sample)

**Day of the week **

- Dmitri Denisov

## D0 Data Collection

- When all systems are running data collection is very smooth
- ~5% front-end busy
- Almost no intervention (except monitoring) is required
- DAQ system is “self- supporting” resolving minor known issues quickly/automatically
- Major downtime is happening when something fails hard
- Power supplies
- Cabling connections
- Cooling

- Dmitri Denisov

## Last Weeks Problems Analysis

- Last week major downtime issues
- Sunday
- ~1.5 hours data loss
- Level 2 rack tripped on low air flow 15 minutes before the store
- Turned power back ON quickly, but Level 2 alpha “started to die” after power outage hanging every ~15 minutes. After an hour replaced by expert
- ~1 hour data loss
- Level 1 trigger crate lost synchronization
- Took 45 minutes to page expert, then 10 minutes to resolve the problem
- Saturday and Friday: no problems in excess of ~15 minutes
- Thursday
- ~1.5 hours data loss
- Forward muon power supply failure at 6:00am (inside collision hall). Problem understood and actions taken within ~10 minutes, but... GUI which suppose to mask trigger inputs from this crate had a bug which masked different crate(!). A lot of confusion with experts coming in and resolving problem 10 minutes before store was lost.
- Wednesday: no problems in excess of ~15 minutes
- Tuesday: no delivered L, studies
- Monday
- ~1.0 hours data loss
- Muon Level 2 trigger failure. Experts were not able to find problem after ~ an hour of hunting (DPF did not help...). Continued data taking without forward muon Level 2. Between stores problem traced to unplugged cable in Level 2 muon system
- Every considerable downtime (more then ~15 minutes) is analyzed by Run Coordinators with sub-detector groups involved and actions to prevent similar problems in the future are developed
- If problem is affecting “minor” portion of the detector: continue physics data collection while experts are resolving problem

- Dmitri Denisov

## D0 Summary

- Stably collecting physics data with full detector in readout
- 82% weekly operating efficiency
- Two one hour collision hall access requests from D0 over last week
- Systematic work on resolving problems with stability of data taking is paying off
- 8 out of 10 “best” D0 runs (duration and efficiency) are collected during March and April 2003
- Stably operating in the ~85% operating efficiency range
- Plan for this week
- Physics data taking
- No access requests (but will use “free” offers)

- Dmitri Denisov
# Presentation: 378920

## Electron Cooling Project: status and plans

- Alexander Shemyakin

- Schematic Layout of the Recycler Electron Cooling

## Stages of the project

- Proof- of- principle experiment at NEC	1995-1999
- Recirculation experiment at Wide Band	2001- 2002
- Full scale beam line at Wide Band 		2003-2004
- Commissioning of ECOOL in Recycler	2005

## Recirculation experiment at WideBand

_**HISTORY**_
- Feb 99:	  5 MV Pelletron ordered.
- Dec 00:   5 MV without vacuum tubes.
- Mar 01:	  Tubes installed.  Operations began.
- May 01:	  First beam of 30 A in the collector.
- Dec 01:	  500 mA at 3.5 MV
- Apr 02:	  NEC replaced acceleration tubes
- Oct 02:	  500 mA at 4.36 MeV
- Nov 02:   Shut down to install the full beamline

## Recirculation experiment at WideBand

**Main results**
- Stable operation at 0.5 A, 3.5 MeV (99% duty factor)
- 1.7 A of maximum current at 3.5 MeV (6 MW)
- 0.6 A of maximum current at 4.36 MeV
- Electronics survives sparks
- An additional Pelletron section was ordered to be installed in MI 31.

## Full scale beam line at WideBand

**Current status**
- - cooling section magnetic fields measured
-  beam line assembled and baked
-  all diagnostics installed
- all BPMs are tested in pulsed mode
-  A DC beam was transported up to the bottom of the deceleration tube
- trouble spots were identified

- The facility almost replicates the future MI 31 (shorter transfer lines and 9 instead 10 modules in the cooling section).

## Full scale beam line at WideBand

**Stages**
- Beam in the entire beam line 	Jul 03
- Final measurements of magnetic
-  field in cooling section		Aug 03
- Stable  0.5 A at 3.5 MeV		Dec 03
- Cold beam at 0.5 A, 3.5 MeV	Mar 04

## Cold beam in the cooling section

- The beam center moves along a straight line within 70 rad. The straightness is controlled by 9 BPMs. The trajectory is adjusted by an entrance angle and by an average dipole field in each module of the cooling section.
- The boundary trajectory doesn’t deviate from a straight line by more than 80 rad in 90% of the cooling section length. The initial tuning of the envelope is done in a pulsed regime with a pencil-like beam. DC beam measurements are done with scrapers.

## MI 31

- MI 31 as of June 03

-   Construction started in March 03 and is now 20% complete
-   Completion is scheduled for March 04
-   Additional Pelletron section arrives in January 04
# Presentation: 534888

## saw greenbrierSmilax  bona-nox L.Synonyms:  S.  hasta,  S.  hederifolia,  S.  renifolia,  S.  variegata.Other common names;  greenbrier, greenbriar, fringed greenbrier, catbrier, bullbrier, Chinabrier, tramp’s trouble. 

**FOOD:**
- The Choctaw  would dry out the tuberous roots, grind them into powder and use it as a flour to bake bread.
- The young shoots were used as greens, either eaten raw or cooked.
- The fruit has a rubbery texture and were chewed much like we use chewing gum.
**CULTURALLY:**
- The Creek women would moisten the leaves and rub them on the face to make them look young.
**MEDICINALLY:**
- The Choctaw  would brew a tea from the stems and drink it as a general health tonic.

- Photo courtesy of:  Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA SCS. 1991. *Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species*. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth, TX. Courtesy of _[USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute](http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/WLI/)_. This image is not copyrighted and may be freely used for any purpose. Please credit the artist, original publication if applicable, and the USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. The following format is suggested and will be appreciated:**Robert H. Mohlenbrock** @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database / **USDA SCS. 1991. *****Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species*****. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth, TX.**

- Slide developed by Pat Broyles, Soil Conservationist, Manhattan, KS. PMC.  USDA is an equal opportunity employer.
# Presentation: 013954

## The Security Plan:Effectively Teaching How to Write One

**Paul Clark**
**Naval Postgraduate School**
**pcclark@nps.edu**

## Introduction

**What is a Security Plan?**
**Why do we need one?**
**Educational standards**
**CISR and NPS**
**Secure Management of Systems: CS3670**
**Lessons learned from requiring a ****Security Plan**

- 2004-Jan-12

## Educational Expectations and Roadmap

**Start the project early in the term.**
**Requires some background.**
**Different suggested formats.**
**Roadmap for the remainder of term.**

- 2004-Jan-12

## The Scenario

**Fiction or Non-Fiction?**
**Minimal requirements for****a written description.**
**Debug**
**Unintended Benefits**

- 2004-Jan-12

## A Template

**Provides direction and uniformity.**
**Possible formats:**
**Each student devises their own**
**The Instructor devises a standard**
**Industry / Government standard**

- 2004-Jan-12

## Assignments

**Options:**
**Turn in a completed security plan at the end of the term.**
**Turn in parts of the plan throughout the term.**
**Risk Analysis Methodology?**

- 2004-Jan-12

## Questions?

- 2004-Jan-12
# Presentation: 379416

## Office of Fusion Energy Sciences

- Research Division

- ITER & International Division

**Curt Bolton****, Acting Director**

**Erol Oktay****,**** Acting Director**

- Marty Carlin, Administrative Specialist

**Steve Eckstrand, ****Acting Director**

** **

- Al Opdenaker

- Shahida Afzal

- Vacant

- Visual Information Specialist

- Executive Assistant, Strategic Planning

- Administrative Specialist

- Sandy Newton, Administrative Specialist (International)

** **

- Associate Director of Science for Fusion Energy Sciences

- Systems Studies

- Yvette Walker

- Administrative Specialist

- Jeff Hoy

- U.S. ITER Program Manager

- 09/08

- John Sauter

- Program Analyst

**Office of Fusion Energy Sciences**

- Princeton Site Office
**Jerry Faul**
- Manager

- Rostom Dagazian

- Alcator C-Mod
-  Deputy Leader Theory Team

- Dave Goodwin*

- General Plasma Science

- Mark Foster
- DIII-D Site Rep.

- T.V. George

- Innovative Confinement Concepts Program, MST

- John Mandrekas

- SciDAC, Fusion Simulation Proj., Theory Team

- Darlene Markevich

- Diagnostics, University Liaison, Education, Outreach

- Erol Oktay

- DIII-D, International Tokamaks

- John Glowienka

- ITER Assistant Program
- Manager

- *  Detailee

- Sharon Stevens*
- Office Operations,
- Budget

- Tom Vanek, Senior Policy Advisor
# Presentation: 535379

## Tipranavir NDA 21-814:Exposure Response Analysis

**Jenny J Zheng, Ph.D.**
**Pharmacometrics Reviewer**
** **
**Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics**
**CDER, FDA**

- 		           FDA Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting

- May 19, 2005

## The measurement of tipranavir cmin and viral IC50 as an option for the individualization of tipranavir/ritonavir dosing

## TPV Cmin, IC50, T20 co-administration significantly influence viral response

**For IQ ****≥ 100, 54% responded to TPV and 73% responded to TPV+T20****For IQ < 100, 21% responded to TPV and 52% responded to TPV+T20**

**IQ effect: p<0.001**
**T20 effect: p<0.001**

**Control+T20**
**Control**

## Cmin in Phase 2 and Phase 3 at Different Doses

- Cmin in Phase 2 and Phase 3 at Different Doses

**500/200**
**Study 52**

**750/200**
**Study 52**

**500/200**
**Study 12/48**

## Inhibitory quotient displays high between-patient variability

- Inhibitory quotient displays high between-patient variability

**500/200**
**Study 12/48**

**500/200**
**Study 52**

**750/200**
**Study 52**

**Inhibitory quotient = C****min ****/ corrected IC****50**

## Probability of grade 3 or 4 ALT toxicity increases with higher tipranavir Cmin

**Probability of grade 3 or 4 ALT toxicity increases with higher tipranavir C****min**

**Study 52 (N=210)**

## Possible Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategy

**Measure IC****50**
**at baseline**

**Determine**
**Cmin at wk 1,2 or 3**

**Is IQ>100?**
**Is tolerable?**

**Dose ****↑**** **

**No/Yes**

**No/No**

**Dose ******

**Yes/No**

**Alternative treatment**

## The measurement of tipranavir cmin and viral IC50 as an option for the individualization of tipranavir/ritonavir dosing
# Presentation: 383578

## Shaftless, Magnetically Levitated Flywheel Energy Storage SystemsMagneMotion, Inc.Acton MA

**ACCOMPLISHMENTS**
- Burst tested to 79,500 RPM.
- 32% higher than design speed.
- Rotor / System tested to 36,000 RPM.
- Flywheel was very stable.
- Bearing losses need to be examined in greater detail.
**  ****	****	****COMMERCIALIZATION**
- Linear synchronous motors and maglev are the core of MagneMotion's business.
- Applications in that arena include providing high peak power for short periods of time, something that is hard to do with batteries.

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation**
**R****esearch**

- 1997 Phase II, SS5-** 060**

**GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
- When used for both energy storage and attitude control the system has the potential to be lighter, more efficient and with a longer life expectance than is possible with conventional alternatives.
- Results are promising but further development is required to create a mission-ready design.
- MagneMotion is in negotiation with established energy storage company to team for continuation.

**Goddard Space Flight Center**

**INNOVATION**
- A maglev flywheel with a shaftless carbon fiber rotor that requires only one axis of active control. The shaftless design eliminates resonances over a wide operating speed range, so the flywheel is usable for both energy storage and attitude control.

- Points of Contact:
- 	NASA – Bob Beaman (301) 286-2538
- 	MagneMotion – Richard D. Thornton (978) 461-5090

**Ceramic core**

**Motor/generator**

**Rotor**

**Magnetic bearing**
# Presentation: 740821

## 
Gateway Update

MLA 2005

- Gateway Update
- MLA 2005

## What is the NLM Gateway?

- A web based system in which the user can initiate a search from a single web interface and search simultaneously in multiple retrieval systems at NLM
- Currently searches 11 collections

## Gateway’s Redesigned Interface

- Clean new look with redesigned interface
- Collections listed individually
- Direct access to results by collection
- Sidebar navigation among the collections
- ‘Select an action’ pull-down menu for functions
- Improved limits and settings

## Limits and Settings

- Limits & Preferences enhanced and combined
- Tabbed format
- Field selection to customize display
- Personal settings available without sign in

## New in the Gateway

- Access to Genetics Home Reference
- NLM Catalog replaces LocatorPlus
- New AIDS meeting abstracts
- 9,549  abstracts from 2 HIV/AIDS meetings
- 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
- 15th International Conference on AIDS

## System Demonstration

- Now for a _[Gateway](http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/gw/Cmd)__ system demonstration_

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

## Slide 28

## Slide 29

## Slide 30

## Slide 31

## Slide 32

## Coming Soon

- Improved MedlinePlus searching
- Access to NCBI Bookshelf, including access to HSTAT
- Meeting abstracts data creation and maintenance system

## Questions?

- Comments?
- Suggestions?
# Presentation: 259501

## The Study of the Changing Solar Interior Using Global and Local Helioseismology 

- LWS TR&T Grant NAG5-13538 E.Rhodes, USC

## Studies of Internal Flow Measurements During Solar Cycle 22 With MWO 60-Foot Tower

- Until now the sub-photospheric torsional oscillations and meridional flows have only been seen in helioseismic data beginning in 1995 with the first GONG data sets and these studies have been extended through 2004 using inversions of  both GONG and MDI observations.
- Due to the importance of these observations for solar dynamo studies, we are employing MWO observations from 1987-1995 to study the torsional oscillations and the meridional flows during Solar Cycle 22.

## Studies of Internal Flow Measurements During Solar Cycle 22 With MWO 60-Foot Tower

- As shown in the next slide, these observations began in 1987 and they comprise the only suitable set of daily observations of full-disk Dopplergams taken prior to 1995 with a temporal cadence and spatial resolution identical to that of  MDI Dopplergrams.
- To validate the utility of these data, we have compared maps of the solar torsional oscillations which we have computed from simultaneous MWO and MDI Dopplergrams. As shown in the last slide, the two maps are very similar and this similarity gives us confidence in the usefulness of the MWO data for these studies.

## MWO 60-Foot Solar Tower Observing 

- MWO 60-Foot Solar Tower Observing
- History in Solar Cycles 22 and 23

- 2002

- 1990

- 1994

- 1998

- 1987

- 1991

- 1995

- 1999

## First Two

- 108-day sets
- Based Upon
- MWO Data
- Only

- First two
- 108-day sets
- Based Upon
- MDI Data Only
# Presentation: 738456

## Case Study : Sigma 4 Office

***Case Study :****** ******Sigma 4 Office***
***Richland, WA***

**Notes:**
Sigma 4 Office Building
3170 George Washington Way
Richland, WA 99352

This Cast Study is used to demonstrate the use of the COMcheck-EZ software.

##  Floor Plan

**Notes:**
Floor Plan used for reference.
The number of windows and doors can be taken from the window/door schedule.  Locations can be verified by the window and door symbols on the plan.
Overall plan dimensions can also be taken from this plan.

##  Building Data

- Floor Area = 20,532 s.f.
- Wall Perimeter = 681 ln. ft.
- Exterior Wall Area  (gross) = 8172 s.f.
- Window Area = 984 s.f.
- Window/Wall Ratio = 12%
- Glass Door Area = 126 s.f.
- Opaque Door Area = 21 s.f.

** ****Activity Areas**
- Office:  15,849 s.f.
- Halls/ Restrooms:  3838 s.f.
- Kitchen:  505 s.f.
- Lobby:  340 s.f.

**Notes:**
Building data is used for COMcheck-EZ and COMcheck-Plus software runs.  Some data (floor to ceiling ht., window/wall ratio, and water heater specifics) are not needed for the COMcheck-EZ run.
The user can choose to enter the activity area breakdowns in COMcheck-EZ but may prefer to consider the entire building “office”.  The activity breakdowns are needed for COMcheck-Plus inputs.
The section referred to on the “Floor to Roof Ht.” line is found on slide 8.

##  Lighting Plan – Existing Lighting

**Notes:**
Existing lighting is detailed in this lighting schedule.  The number of fixtures are listed for software inputs. Symbols are used so the specific locations of the various lighting fixtures can be verified on the plan.

##  Mechanical Plan

**Notes:**
The unit numbers and corresponding descriptions of the heat pump units are listed on the mechanical plan.  This information is taken from the original building plans.  Not all of the information listed will be used for inputs in COMcheck-EZ and/or COMcheck-Plus.  

NOTE:  The exterior lighting is not entered into the software for code compliance.  Only efficacy requirements apply to exterior lighting.  The exterior lighting is included as part of the lighting schedule because this case study is intended to represent (although greatly simplified and generalized) what users will find in typical building plans.

##  Building Section

**Notes:**
The material specifications and dimensions in this section are used for a number of inputs in both COMcheck-EZ and COMcheck-Plus.  

The overhang dimension and vertical window placement are used to determine the projection factor ( .5) used in COMcheck-EZ. 

 The distance from the top of the window to the overhang is 1.5’ (6’ – 4.5’).  This dimension is used to define the overhang in COMcheck-Plus.  The extension (the distance the overhang extends horizontally in the plane of the window past the edge of the window jambs) is assumed to be 3’ for this case study.  This assumption approximates the continuous overhang present in this building.
# Presentation: 674037

## XBT and Argo data comparison in the Atlantic Ocean

*Claudia Schmid (NOAA/AOML) *
*Vicki Halliwell (RSMAS/UM)*

## Summary plot of difference profiles

## Statistics of differences for all floats

**Notes:**
All floats
Left: outliers included
Right: s, outliers excluded

## Statistics of differences for floats with P-problem

**Notes:**
SOLO_TS16, before correction
Left: outliers included
Right: outliers excluded

## Statistics of differences, with outliers

**Floats without**
**P-problem**

**Floats with    P-problem**

**Notes:**
Left: SOLO_TS16 excluded, outliers included
Right: Only SOLO_TS16, outliers included

## Statistics of differences, outliers excluded

**Floats without**
**P-problem**

**Floats with    P-problem**

**Notes:**
Left: SOLO_TS16 excluded, outliers excluded
Right: Only SOLO_TS16, outliers excluded

## Statistics of differences by year

**2003**

**2007**

**Notes:**
Left: All floats for 2003, outliers excluded
Right: All floats for 2007, outliers excluded

## Differences below 250 dbar, all floats

**Notes:**
p_lim_bar=250
cmp_all_PXdt10dx05bar2.png

## Differences above 250 dbar, all floats

**Notes:**
p_lim_bar=-250
cmp_all_PXdt10dx05bar_t2.png

## Differences below 250 dbar, 2007, no floats with p-problem

**Notes:**
p_lim_bar=250
cmp_all_PXdt10dx05_NO_SOLO_TS16_2007bar2.png

## Differences above 250 dbar , 2007, no floats with p-problem

**Notes:**
p_lim_bar=-250
cmp_all_PXdt10dx05_NO_SOLO_TS16_2007bar_t2.png

## Differences of mean 10 m heat storage in upper 700 m

**Mean difference 0.97*10****7**** Jm****-2**

**Notes:**
Differences of mean heat storage in the upper 700 m based on 10 m layers.
Max total heat storage is 5e+10.
Mean total heat content 3.4e+10 divide by 70 layers -> about 5e+8
differences are up to 5e+7 mean over all differences 0.8e+7 -> right ball park.
SOLO_TS16 included
Mean SOLO_TS16 difference for 10dbar layer: 0.3C*1000*4000*10 = 1.2e+7

## Differences of mean 10 m heat storage in upper 400 m

**Mean difference 0.82*10****7**** Jm****-2**

**Notes:**
Differences of mean heat storage in the upper 700 m based on 10 m layers.
Max total heat storage is 5e+10.
Mean total heat content 3.4e+10 divide by 70 layers -> about 5e+8
differences are up to 5e+7 mean over all differences 0.8e+7 -> right ball park.
SOLO_TS16 included
Mean SOLO_TS16 difference for 10dbar layer: 0.3C*1000*4000*10 = 1.2e+7

## Differences of mean 10 m heat storage in 400-700 m

**Mean difference 1.16*10****7**** Jm****-2**

**Notes:**
Differences of mean heat storage in the upper 700 m based on 10 m layers.
Max total heat storage is 5e+10.
Mean total heat content 3.4e+10 divide by 70 layers -> about 5e+8
differences are up to 5e+7 mean over all differences 0.8e+7 -> right ball park.
SOLO_TS16 included
Mean SOLO_TS16 difference for 10dbar layer: 0.3C*1000*4000*10 = 1.2e+7
# Presentation: 536282

## Controlled Hydrogen Fleet and Infrastructure Demonstration and Validation Project

***Technical Report***
**NREL/TP-560-41153**
**February 2007**

**Controlled Hydrogen Fleet and Infrastructure ****Demonstration and Validation Project**
**First Set of Composite Data Products ****for Publication - March 1, 2006**
- Keith Wipke, Cory Welch, Holly Thomas, and Sam Sprik

## NOTICE

**NOTICE**
- This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.  Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.  The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

- Available electronically at _[http://](http://www.osti.gov/bridge)__[www.osti.gov](http://www.osti.gov/bridge)__[/bridge](http://www.osti.gov/bridge)_
- Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energyand its contractors, in paper, from:
- U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Scientific and Technical Information
- P.O. Box 62Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062phone:  865.576.8401fax: 865.576.5728email:  _[mailto:reports@adonis.osti.gov](mailto:reports@adonis.osti.gov)_
- Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:
- U.S. Department of CommerceNational Technical Information Service5285 Port Royal RoadSpringfield, VA 22161phone:  800.553.6847fax:  703.605.6900email: _[orders@ntis.fedworld.gov](mailto:orders@ntis.fedworld.gov)_online ordering:  _[http://](http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm)__[www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm](http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm)_

- Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste

## Controlled Hydrogen Fleet and Infrastructure Demonstration and Validation Project –First Set of Composite Data Products for Publication

- Keith Wipke, Cory Welch, Holly Thomas, Sam Sprik
- March 1, 2006

- Prepared under Task No. H270.8100

## CDP#2: Vehicle Range

## CDP#6: Fuel Economy

## CDP#9: Safety Incidents – Vehicles

## CDP#10: Storage Weight % Hydrogen

## CDP#11: Volumetric Capacity of H2 Storage

## CDP#12: Vehicle Hydrogen Tank Cycle Life

## CDP#16: H2 Purity Sampled from Stations

## CDP#17: H2 Impurities

## CDP#18: Histogram: Refueling Rate

## CDP#20: Safety Incidents – Infrastructure

## CDP#21: Range of Ambient TemperatureDuring Vehicle Operation

## CDP#22: Vehicle Operating Hours

## CDP#23: Vehicles vs. Miles Traveled

## CDP#24: Cumulative Vehicle Miles Traveled

## CDP#25: Vehicle H2 Storage Technologies

## CDP#26: Cumulative H2 Produced or Dispensed