BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 705410

##         Successes in the Fight Against Drugs

**Drug Enforcement Administration** Office of Public Affairs                202-307-7977

- October 2007

**        ****Successes in the Fight Against Drugs**
**President’s Goals**:  In 2002, the Bush Administration set ambitious goals to reduce drug use.  The first was to lower drug use by 10% over 2 years.  We exceeded that goal--youth drug use dropped by 11% over 2 years.  The second was to lower drug use by 25% over 5 years.  We nearly reached that goal by achieving a 23% decline since 2001 for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders combined.  Reductions in illicit drug use among 8th and 10th graders exceeded the President’s goal, falling 30% and 26% since 2001, respectively.
_**Impact on Demand:**__** **_
**Teen drug use:**  840,000 fewer teenagers are using illicit drugs now than in 2001.  This is a 23% decline since 2001.
**Marijuana:**  Current marijuana use by teens has dropped by 25% since 2001.
**Meth use:**  Current meth use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders plummeted 50% since 2001.
**Ecstasy:**  Since 2001, current use of Ecstasy has been slashed by 61% for 8th graders and 54% for both 10th and 12th graders.
**Cocaine:**  Between 1986 and 2006, past year cocaine use among high school seniors dropped by more than half (55%).
**Steroids:**** ** Since 2001, current use of steroids by teens (8th, 10th, and 12th graders combined) has dropped 20%.
**LSD:****  **Since 2001,** **current LSD use has dropped an astounding 60% by 8th graders, 53% by 10th graders, and 74% for 12th graders.
**Workplace drug use:**  Drug use among workers is at its lowest levels in 18 years.  Since 1988, positive drug tests have fallen by 72 percent, from 13.6% in 1988 to 3.8% in 2006.
**Workplace meth use:**  2006 workplace drug tests show a 45% decline in meth use among employees nationwide since 2004.
**Workplace cocaine use:**  Cocaine use among America’s workers declined almost 16% during the first six months of 2007, compared to 2006.
# Presentation: 129026

## FDA Presentationto the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee

**manufactured by IDEC Pharmaceuticals**
**BLA 125019**
**September 11, 2001**

**FDA Presentation****to the**** ****Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee**

## Review Committee 

**Product/Committee Chair:****	****Marjorie Shapiro, Ph.D.**
**Clinical Reviewers:****	****	****Philippe C. Bishop, M.D.**
**	****	****	****	****	****	****George Mills, M.D.**
**Biostatistician:****	****	****	****Satish C. Misra, Ph.D.**
**Clinical Toxicology/**
**     ****Pharmacology:                ****	****Dave Green, Ph.D.**
**Compliance/BIMO:****	****	****Mary Andrich, M.D.**
**Product Reviewer:****	**** ****	****Leon Epps, Ph.D.**
**	****CMC Reviewers:****	****	****	****Deborah Trout, B.S.**
**	****	****	****	****	****	****Kevin O’Brien, B.A.**
**Regulatory Project ****	****	**
**   ****Manager: ****	****	****	****Michael Noska, M.S.**

## Characteristics of 2B8 

**Murine IgG1, ******** (Ibritumomab)**
**anti-CD20**
**Manufactured by standard tissue culture and purification procedures**
**Conjugated with MX-DTPA (tiuxetan) chelate**
**Ibritumomab tiuxetan packaged in kits for radiolabeling with ****111****Indium or ****90****Yttrium (Zevalin****TM)**

## Ibritumomab tiuxetan Structure

**    ****mAb          Linker/Chelator; MX-DTPA**
**                                     **

## Ibritumomab tiuxetan
50 mM Sodium Acetate
Formulation buffer
Reaction vial

**50 mM Sodium Acetate**
**Formulation buffer**
**Reaction vial**

**Zevalin******** Kit Components**

## Preparation of Radiolabeled-Zevalin

**Ordering of ****111****In from  **
**   ****approved source**
**Coordinated ordering of  **
**    ****111****In– and ****90****Y-Zevalin******** Kits **
**   ****and ****90****Y through distributor**
**Final ****111****In- and ****90****Y-labeled   **
**   ****Zevalin******** are prepared on  **
**   ****site at radiopharmacy**

## Zevalin Therapy Components

**Step 1**
**Rituximab**
**111****In-Zevalin******
**Step 2**
**Rituximab**
**90****Y-Zevalin******

## Proposed Indication

**For the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory low grade, follicular or CD20+ transformed B cell Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and rituximab refractory follicular NHL**
# Presentation: 673185

## Droplet Evaporator

-  Order of magnitude increase in heat flux (330W/cm2)
-  Order of magnitude increase in heat transfer                    		coefficient ( 9 W/cm2-K)
-  Novel Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) power supply    		(U.S. Patent No. 5,399,825)
-  Significant breakthroughs in the technology of precision small 		hole drilling
**                             ****COMMERCIALIZATION**
-  Project resulted in development of advanced electric discharge 		machining (EDM) technology, useful in small hole machining
-  Spin-off firm, Mikros Manufacturing Inc. is using this technology
- 	 in commercial markets including orifice plates for ink-jet printers
-  More than $500,000 in private investment, as well as >$1.5 M in 	related R&D funding

***CREARE, INC.***
***HANOVER, NH***

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**

**     ****GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
-  Two-phase thermal management systems for the Space 		Station and related environments
-  Improved aircraft fuel injectors

- 1985 Phase 2; SS-102; 3/12/96

- Johnson Space Center

**Droplet Evaporator**

***Aircraft Fuel Injector Orificer (0.010” diameter )***
# Presentation: 025246

## Slide 1

## Introduction

-   Biosyn is the leading microbicide company
-   Three compounds in development
-   Phase III, Phase I, Preclinical
-   Need for compounds in Phase III clinical trials
-   Microbicide trials are complex, but achievable with simplified, 	correct approach

**Introduction**

## Rationale for Phase III Trial Design

-   HEC common placebo will provide frame of reference for other 	studies
-   12-month duration for each person maximizes compliance and 	good clinical practice and reduces participant fatigue 	(discontinuation and loss-to-follow up)
-   12-month inclusion will reduce significant changes in risk behavior 	compared with up to 24-months

**Rationale for Phase III Trial Design**

## Control Arm Selection

-   Comparison to an unblinded no treatment (condom 	only) arm 	presents a bias with regard to post-	randomization behaviors which cannot be controlled
-   Adding an unblinded no treatment arm to the study 	cannot aid the detection of an increased or decreased 	HIV infection rate in the placebo group, rather adds the 	risk of producing a false negative

**Control Arm Selection**

## Post Randomization Bias

**No Treatment**
- Subject Choices:
-   Condoms only	OR
-   Nothing at all

**Placebo Gel**
- Subject Choices:
-   Gel + Condoms	OR
-   Gel alone		OR
-   Condoms alone	OR
-   Nothing at all

**Active Gel**
- Subject Choices:
-   Gel + Condoms	OR
-   Gel alone		OR
-   Condoms alone	OR
-   Nothing at all

- Bias resulting from a study design that offers the subjects a different decision making paradigm is unclear, but if done becomes undetectable and embedded in the study

## Credibility Machinery for Clinical

**Trials**

-   Adhere to highest standards of ethical and statistical 	practices
-   Comprehensive protocol development and review with 	experts and regulatory bodies with interim analysis 	(DSMB)
-   Application of baseline difference avoidance tools and 	replicate trials

## Optimal Microbicide Phase III Study

- 1.0% C31G Gel

- Placebo Gel

- vs

- Condom Counseling
- 12 month duration for all participants

- Most efficient and effective design for the assessment of tolerance and effectiveness
# Presentation: 354829

## University of Minnesota-Twin Cities MRSEC Timothy P. Lodge DMR-0212302 Tailoring Nanoporous Materials (IRG 1)

- The synthesis of nanoporous materials with well-defined pore sizes and surface properties is essential for their use in applications based on selective adsorption and interfacial chemical processes, such as affinity chromatography and heterogeneous catalysis. Research efforts in Professor Marc Hillmyer’s group toward this end have culminated in a new class of nanoporous materials enabling such control. Dr. Javid Rzayev, a postdoctoral fellow working with Hillmyer, has shown that chemically-etchable ABC triblock copolymer precursors can be used for the fabrication of nanoporous matrices with controlled interior surface properties. In a polystyrene-poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide)-polylactide (PS-PDMA-PLA) triblock copolymer, PS constitutes the matrix, PDMA provides functionality on the interior pore surfaces, while PLA is a sacrificial minority component. The flow alignment of the self-assembled triblock copolymer samples and subsequent removal of PLA cylinders provided a nanoporous, glassy PS matrix containing hexagonally packed array of channels coated with hydrophilic PDMA (see Figure). The PDMA on the pore walls renders the pores water compatible, and controlled hydrolysis of these polymer “brushes” produces a desired density of highly polar carboxylic acid groups, which can in turn be easily converted to other functional units. This modular approach allows for the fabrication of a variety of novel and potentially useful nanoporous matrices from a single triblock copolymer precursor. [Rzayev, J.; Hillmyer, M. Nanochannel Array Plastics with Tailored Surface Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13373. Highlighted in Materials Today 2005, November 15]

**Figure**.  A nanoporous sample of polystyrene containing hexagonally packed channels coated with hydrophilic PDMA chains. Pore size = 18 nm.
# Presentation: 701646

## caBIGTM Tool Overview caTIES - cancer Text Information Extraction System: extracts coded information from free-text clinical documents

**Key Stakeholders Involved:**
- Tissue Banks and Pathology Tools Workspace
- Developer: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- Adopters: Washington University, Thomas Jefferson University, University of Pennsylvania

## caTIES Overview

- Brief Description of caTIES
- caTIES extracts coded information from free-text clinical documents such as surgical pathology reports (SPRs) using controlled terminologies to populate caBIG compliant data structures.
- Provide researchers with the ability to query, browse, and acquire annotated tissue data and physical material across a network of federated sources.
- Primary User Groups/Beneficiaries:
- Pathologists
- Tissue Bankers
- Registrars

## Tool Installation Requirements & Release Schedule

**Installation Requirements**** **
**Operating system**: Windows 2000, NT, XP
**High Speed Ethernet**: IEEE 802.11
**RAM**: At least 1 Gigabyte for the Server
**Router**: A secure Firewall/Router for the Server.
**Database**: MySQL 5.0.28
**Browser**: Netscape 7 and above, Internet Explorer 5 and above, Mozilla Firefox 1.x and above
**Java**: 1.4.2_04
**Current Release Information: caTIES v2.0**** **
- Final release: August 2006
- Gold level compatible (Grid Enabled)

## Tool/Resources & Support

- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) hosts a caTIES website at http://caties.cabig.upmc.edu - Website contains background information about the tool, documentation, and the full installation package.
- Supporting documentation includes: Systems Installation and Administration Guide, and End User Manual
- The **NCICB Application Support Group** is also available by phone, e-mail, or web-based submittal forms.

## Workspace Contacts and Other Links

- TBPT Workspace Lead
- Juergen Klenk (klenk_juergen@bah.com)

**Bi-Weekly TBPT Workspace calls**
- Objective: TBPT Project and caBIG Program updates
- Schedule: 12-1 PM ET, 1st and 3rd Monday of each month
- Dial-in: 888-283-8679
- Passcode: 5746946
- http://ncicb.centra.com
- Meeting ID: TBPT

**Monthly TBPT Newcomer calls **
- Objective: Bringing newcomers up to speed with the TBPT workspace.
- Schedule: 12-1 PM ET, 2nd Monday of each month
- Dial-in: 888-283-8679
- Passcode: 8209848
- http://ncicb.centra.com
- Meeting ID: newcomer

- Ways to become involved with the Tissue Banks and Pathology Tools (TBPT) Workspace
- Subscribe for the TBPT LISTSERV at https://list.nih.gov/archives/cabig_tbpt-l.html.
- Visit the caBIGTM TBPT website: https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/workspaces/TBPT
- Dial-in to our bi-weekly workspace calls, or monthly newcomer calls.  Call-in Information:

- NCI Facilitator
- Ian Fore (forei@mail.nih.gov)
# Presentation: 421479

## Mach Number TechniqueFaster in Back

##  2.5.4.2  “Rule of Thumb” for faster in back

- “For each 600 NM in distance between the entry and exit points of the area where the MNT is used, add one minute for each 0.01 difference in Mach number for the two aircraft concerned to compensate for the fact that the second aircraft is overtaking the first aircraft”
- *  ICAO Doc 9426

## Appendix A

- Table - Application of MACH Number Technique
- when the Following Aircraft is the Faster

## Faster in BackPolar 3

## 0.02 Mach Difference

**0.02 Mach Difference**

- Entry
- Point
- ALPHA

- QF5                     CX102

- What is the required
-  spacing between
- aircraft?

**0.02 Mach Difference**

- UAL5, FL320        CPA102, FL340

**RAMEL**

- 17 Min

## Slide 6

## 992 NM

**992 NM**

## 0.02 Mach Difference

**0.02 Mach Difference**

- Entry
- Point
- ALPHA

- QF5                     CX102

- What is the required
-  spacing between
- aircraft at same altitude?
**ANSWER: 14 Min**

**0.02 Mach Difference**

- UAL5, FL320        CPA102, FL340

**RAMEL**

- 17 Min
# Presentation: 217412

## Boeing 747SP CWT

-  Flammability Survey

- William M CavageProject Engineer - Fuel Tank Inerting FAA AAR-440, Fire Safety R&D Branch

## Outline

- Background
- Test Article
- Preliminary Data

## Background

- FAA Rulemaking Based on Reduction of Fleet Flammability Exposure
- Need to Validate Manufactures Temperature Models
- Temperature of the Pack Bay Drives the Temperature of the Fuel and Ullage which Directly Bare on Flammability
- Pack Bay Temperature is Directly Dependant on Local Weather (Temperatures, Pressures, Humidity, and Wind)
- Need to Study Time/Transport Effects
- Temperature of Fuel Drives Ullage Fuel Vapor Content but it is Effected by Ullage,Wall, and Ceiling Temperatures
- Time Transport Effects Seem Significant

## Test Article

- Boeing 747SP
- Decommissioned from Airline Service and Purchased by the FAA for Ground Testing Only
- All Major Systems Fully Operational
- Has Independent Power for Test Equipment and Instrumentation
- Full Complement of Ground Service Equipment
- Instrumentation
- Center-Wing Tank Fully Instrumented
- Gas Sample Tubing for Oxygen and Total Hydrocarbon Analysis
- 32 Thermocouples in Tank (Ullage, Fuel, Walls, Floor, and Ceiling)
- Other Instrumentation
- Additional Thermocouples in Pack Bay, NEA Deposit, Cabin etc.
- Some Weather Data Acquired

## Boeing 747SP in Photo

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Top Diagram

## Preliminary Data

- Allow Aircraft to sit for Short Period
- Run ACMs for 3-4 Hours
- Examine Evolution of Temperatures and THC
- Examine the Effects of Ambient Temperature on the Flammability of the Tank in Terms of Ground Operation Time
- Examine the Effects of Fuel Load

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Temperature Data

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Temperature Data

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Flammability Data

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Temperature Data

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Flammability Data

## 747SP Center Wing Tank Flammability Data

## Summary

- Temperature Data Problems Need to be Worked Out to Validate the Temperature/Time/Flammability Relationships
- Preliminary Data on Small Fuel Loads Shows Difficult to get Flammable Ullage
# Presentation: 947579

## Magnetically Self-Consistent Ring-Current Simulations for the Storm of 19 October 1998

**M. W. Chen****1****, S. Liu****2****, M. Schulz****3****, J. Roeder****1****,**** and L. R. Lyons****2**** **
**1****The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA **
**2****Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA**** **
**3****Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA **

## 2

## Simulation Model 

- Magnetic field lines: *r *=* L****a*** [1 + 0.5(*r*/*b*)3] sin2 where *b* is a stretching factor that varies with *L* and ****.  These field lines lie in meridional planes.  Electric potential function:
- where *V*cor = 90.3 kV; V0 = 25 kV, *V* = *V*(*t*)

- 3

## Simulation Model, cont.

-   Initial conditions: solution to steady state transport equation
-   Boundary conditions based on time-averaged LANL/MPA data at GEO [*Korth et al*., 1999]
-   Proton loss: charge exchange
-   Electrons loss: weak diffusion inside the plasmasphere [*Albert*, 1994]; enhanced scattering (due to ECH waves) outside [*Lyons*, 1974]
-   Map phase-space density by Liouville’s theorem, modified to account for losses
-   Compute near-equatorial plasma pressure at each major time step
-   Compute resulting **B**(**r**) normal to equatorial plane
-   Update **B**(**r**) at each major time step (*t* = 20 min)
-   Do the guiding-center simulation again for the updated **B**(**r**)
-   Iterate until convergence to desired self-consistent model (plasma and **B** field) is achieved

- 4

## 5

## 6

## 7

## Consistency of B field with hot-plasma population tends to mitigate energization of plasma during transport into the ring current, as compared to simulations that lack a self-consistent magnetic field.  This confirms findings of RCM-E simulations [Lemon et al., 2004]. 
Our model qualitatively reproduces features seen in statistically averaged observations of ring current [e.g., Le et al., 2004].

- Our model qualitatively reproduces features seen in statistically averaged observations of ring current [e.g., *Le et al*., 2004].

- 8

## 9

## 10

## 11
# Presentation: 132541

## NCABOverview of Budget & Planning Committee RetreatEmerging Concepts

***Franklyn G. Prendergast, MD,Ph.D., NCAB******Robert Young, MD, BSA***

## 	i) 	Protect the young investigator 	to the greatest extent possible, 	by as many means as possible, 	e.g., preferential pay lines for 	young investigators.

## 	ii) 	“PARITY and Pain”:  All 	programs of NCI must share the 	overall burden of rescissions.  	Programs include those 	established and those recently 	initiated.  Great wisdom must be 	exercised in the initiation of new 	programs.

## Re-examine and justify the existence of and/or the funding allocations to all large-scale NCI programs.  
	Program reductions and/or actual sunsetting of some programs seem inevitable with reallocation to other funding mechanisms.

**	****Program reductions and/or actual sunsetting of some programs seem inevitable with reallocation to other funding mechanisms.**

## Pay lines for R01 grants at the 10th percentile are not tenable in the long term.
Increase number of grants by reducing budgets awarded?
Reduce number of total grants held by any one senior investigator?
Pursue additional joint-funding mechanisms with non-NIH partners?

- Increase number of grants by reducing budgets awarded?
- Reduce number of total grants held by any one senior investigator?
- Pursue additional joint-funding mechanisms with non-NIH partners?

## v) 	Insure the balance of research 	among the basic, translational, 	clinical and populations science 	portfolios of the National Cancer 	Institute

## vi)  	In view of the current fiscal 	exigencies, mandatory allocations, 	e.g., to NIH road map initiatives, 	need to be prudently tempered, 	especially in terms of planned 	expansions for years 2007-2009.

## vii) 	NCI leadership must collaborate 	with members of the cancer 	research community to develop 	much more effective 	communications with the public at 	large and with congress.

## viii)  The cancer research community and 	the public should be engaged in 	defining what constitutes “return on 	investment” (ROI)
# Presentation: 520536

## Introduction to the Pediatric PPK (PD) Study Design Template and Analyses of the FDA Pediatric DatabaseClinical Pharmacology SubcommitteeAdvisory Committee for Pharmaceutical SciencesApril 22-23, 2003Rockville, Maryland

**Lawrence J. Lesko, Ph.D.**
**Director, Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics**
**Center for Drug Evaluation and Research**
**Food and Drug  Administration**

## Pediatric Rule or Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act

**Use adult clinical data to draw conclusions about the efficacy, safety and dosing of drugs in pediatric patients**
- avoids large scale pediatric clinical trials
- basis to decide what studies to conduct
- expedites access to drugs for children
- cost-effective
- generally successful in meeting goals

## Some Questions Always Need Assessment

**Is it reasonable to assume a similar PK-PD relationship as adults**
- need to develop standard methods for specific drugs and drug classes
**What is the appropriate dose?**
- rely on PK studies
- full exposure profiles or sparse samples
- dosing intended to achieve exposure similar to adults
- standardized PPK study design template would be useful (Dr. Peter Lee)

## What Can Be Learned From the Studies Conducted Under the Pediatric Rule?

**Evaluation of the FDA pediatric database**
- age groups, PK data, elimination pathways, clinical endpoints
**Presentation of research objectives to generate knowledge from database**
- look at the underlying mechanisms (age-related) where exposure differences exist between children and adults
- goal is to improve or revise the pediatric decision tree to better identify studies need in children
- Dr. Gene Williams
# Presentation: 674198

## Robin M. VestWing Financial Analyst2008 Summer National Boards

- e-108s and WMIRS

## Introduction

- Advantages
- Process
- Changes to a 108
- Recording in QuickBooks®
- Questions

## New e-108 System

- Starting 1 October e-108s will:
- Reduce paperwork – electronic approvals; no faxing
- Allow NHQ to reimburse wings more rapidly
- Save time - eliminate the need to enter A/R or tail number classes in QuickBooks for NHQ-reimbursed missions
- Being tested in AK, KY, SD, TX, VA

## e-108 Approval

## e-108 Batch Report 

## Batch Reports from WMIRS

## Find the Batch

## EFT Notice

## e-108 (Correction)

## e-108 From WMIRS

## e-108 From WMIRS (Correction)

## WMIRS e-108 (Correction)

## E-Mail Draftback Notice

## Draft Back

## Recording Batches in QuickBooks®

- Record a deposit rather than an A/R
- Deposit will be recorded on the day EFT notice received
- WFAs will accrue batches paid after 9/30
- No need to record tail number on NHQ-reimbursed missions
- Wings on Consolidated Mx will not record minor mx from NHQ
- Will continue to breakout by mission type

## Recording in QuickBooks®

## Recording the Deposit

## Recording the Draft Back
# Presentation: 243216

## Pilot Job Control

- DN=Amber

- DN=Mark

- DN=Bob

- DN=Joe

- CDFCAF

- ...

- DN=Igor

- Gatekeeper/Batch Queue

- WN
- Amber’s job runs
- as DN=Igor

- GUMS

- SAZ

- 1

- 2

- 3

- 4

- (5)

- GUMS – DN to local UID mapper
- SAZ – site DN authorization

- Current modus operandi

- WN
- Mark’s job runs
- as DN=Igor

- ...

## Pilot Job Control

- DN=Amber

- DN=Mark

- DN=Bob

- DN=Joe

- CDFCAF

- ...

- DN=Igor

- Gatekeeper/Batch Queue

- WN
- glexec maps job
- to DN=Amber

- GUMS

- SAZ

- 1

- 2

- 3

- 4

- 5

- 6

- 7

- Glexec modus operandi

- WN
- glexec maps job
- to DN=Mark

- ...

- GUMS – DN to local UID mapper
- SAZ – site DN authorization

## Pilot Job Control

- We recognize that there is no feasible way to technically control the execution of pilot jobs - it is very easy for an end user to hide the execution of Pilot Jobs.
- The only way to control Pilot Jobs is with policy

## Pilot Job Control

- “A Pilot Job is defined as a job where a Job Manager submits a job request to a grid batch system but the application that is executed on the Worker Nodes has been created by, and the input and output data is owned by, another user.
- “A Pilot Job must correctly map the executed application and the input and output data to the actual owner of the application.
- “Any job that is discovered to be a Pilot Job which does not correctly perform the appropriate user mapping using the Site supplied utility (i.e., glexec) will be terminated immediately and the DN of the Job Manager will be placed on the Site Black List until the situation is rectified.”

## Pilot Job Control

- Some of you know that I’m a pilot...

## Pilot Job Control	

- There are two new pilots on the way!
# Presentation: 685655

- ROOM
- AIR CONDITIONERS

- ENERGY STAR®** **SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING

## WHAT IS ENERGY STAR?

**meet strict energy efficiency **
**guidelines set by:**
-     The US Environmental
-     Protection Agency (EPA)
-     The US Department of Energy (DOE)
**ENERGY STAR**
-     Saves energy
-     Reduces pollution
-     Saves money

- www.energystar.gov

- WHAT IS ENERGY STAR?

## WHAT ARE ENERGY STAR QUALIFIEDROOM AIR CONDITIONERS? 

**ENERGY STAR qualified room air conditioners exceed minimum federal standards for energy consumption by at least 10% due to features like: **
-   High-efficiency compressors
-   Fan motors
-   Heat transfer surfaces
-   Timers
-   Improved insulation
**ENERGY STAR qualified room air conditioners remove more heat from the air into the coils than conventional models, which saves energy required to compress the refrigerant.**

## SAVING ENERGYEQUALS SAVING MONEY

- SAVING ENERGYEQUALS SAVING MONEY

- ENERGY STAR qualified products use less energy and cost less to operate resulting in:

- The average home spends $300 a year on utility costs to run their appliances.
- Replacing a 10-year old air conditioner with a new ENERGY STAR qualified model can save about $15 annually on utility costs or up to $180 over the lifetime of the unit.

## WHY SAVEENERG?

**WHY SAVE****ENERG?**

- SAVING ENERGY HELPSPROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT

- If just one in 10 homes replaced their appliances with ENERGY STAR, the change would reduce air pollution by 600 million pounds per year – equivalent to planting 1.7 million new acres of trees.

## WHY BUY ENERGY STAR?

**High quality performance**
-   More efficient motors and improved
-    insulation make ENERGY STAR
-    qualified room air conditioners quieter
-    than conventional models
-   Timers, on some models, yield even
-    greater energy savings
**Save money without sacrifice**
-   Save an average of $180 on utility bills
-    over the lifetime of the unit depending on
-    the size of the unit replaced

## WHICH BRANDS AREENERGY STAR QUALIFIED?

**Trusted brands like these...**
-   Electrolux
-   Fedders
-   GE Appliances
-   Haier
-   LG Electronics
- [Customize as appropriate]

## SNAPSHOT

**ENERGY STAR is:**
- A government-backed program *(www.energystar.gov)* dedicated to helping individuals protect the environment  through superior energy efficiency.  Look for the ENERGY STAR symbol on qualified room air conditioners.
**Saving energy reduces the burning of fossil fuels, which leads to less air pollution and ultimately reduces global warming. **
**ENERGY STAR qualified room air conditioners:**** **
-   Are more energy efficient and run more quietly with:
-   High efficiency compressors
-   Fan motors
-   Heat transfer surfaces
-   Improved insulation
-   Can save an average of $180 over the lifetime of the unit

## 2004 Cool Change Campaign

**THEME:**** **Make a Cool Change
**TIMING:****  **April – August
**GOAL:** Increase awareness of ENERGY STAR qualified cooling equipment and benefits of energy efficiency
**FEATURED PRODUCTS:** Heating, Cooling and Ventilation Products, Room Air Conditioners,** **Programmable Thermostats, Ceiling Fans
# Presentation: 111079

## Search for Exotic Hadrons, H-dibaryon resonance and Pentaquark

- K.Imai (Kyoto Univ.)
- for KEK-PS E522 collaboration
- Introduction
- KEK-PS E522 experiment
- H-dibaryon resonance by C(K-,K+) reaction
- Pentaquark, +, by  - p -> K- +
- Summary

- J.K.Ahn et al., Phys. Lett. B444,267(1998)

-  (1)  H-dibaryon Resonance?
-         Kp->K; (p) -> H,
-         H->

-  (2)  Strong Final State Interaction?

******-Enhancement by the KEK-E224**

##  Can we understand 

** **
** **
** **
** **

-  **Can we understand **
**        ****Consistently  ? **

- B~1.01 MeV

**6****He******

**M.Kurosawa ****b)**

**, B.H.Choi ****g)**

**M.Hyata, H.Sato ****a)**

**J.Asai, M.Kurosawa ****b)**

**M.Ieiri, H.Takahashi ****c)**

## -

- 20 cm

- SCIFI active target

##   Performances / Results

**214**

**151 events,  ****12****C(K****-****,K****+********X) Analyzed**

## Simulation Data

- Real Data

** **
******-Invariant Mass **
** **
** **

- S~ 9 
- to the Combinatorial
- S~3
- to the INC+fss2(QCM)

- fss2 well reproduce
- B(6He)~ 1.  MeV

## Conclusion 1

*We have confirmed the peak near threshold in **** mass spectrum previously observed by E224 with higher statistics.*
*The data can not be explained with final state interaction which is consistent with weak attractive **** “binding” energy determined from the mass of **6**He****.*
*The H-dibaryon resonance is a possible interpretation of the peak. More theoretical input is needed as well as experiments.*
*Data Analysis was done by C.J.Yoon (Kyoto)*

## Pentaquark search in KEK-PS E522

- Objectives of E522
- H-dibaryon resonance search via (K-,K+) reaction
- Kaonic Nuclei search via (K-,p) reaction
-  search via (-,K-) reaction   (as extra)

| Pbeam(GeV/c) | target | - beam | (-,K-) event | comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9 | Scifi(CH) | 2.9 × 109 | 17 × 103 | Scifi two times thicker |
| 1.9 | CH2 | 4.2 × 109 | 14 × 103 |  |
| 1.95 | CH2 | 7.4 × 109 | 40 × 103 |  |
| 1.9, 1.95 | C |  |  | Contribution of Carbon |
| 1.9, 1.95 + | CH2 |  | (+,K+) reaction | To check + |

- 3days

## Missing mass spectrum of (+,K+) reaction

-  Inverse reaction of (-,K-)
-  Observe + peak

## Missing mass spectrum of (,K)

- P=1.87GeV/c

- P=1.92GeV/c

- SCIFI , CH2 data are combined
- No clear peak

- CH2 data
- A bump around 1.53GeV/c2
- Statistical fluctuation?

## Fitting of spectrum

- Peak position
- Width
- Counts 182.570.8(stat.) 9.9(syst.)
- Statistical significance 2.5~2.7
- Upper limit of peak count N < 298.3(90% C.L.)

## Upper limit of cross section

- fbeam=83%(e, contamination 13%,
-                         reaction 4%)
- eK2=72.3%
- eDAQ=94%
- fKabs=89.8%
- etrack=84.6%
- fdecay=57.6%
- fcherenkov=91%
- eMT=95.7%
- eana=51%
- d=0.14sr

## Conclusion 2

*We have searched for Pentaquark ****+ by ****- p -> K- ****+ reaction at KEK-PS*
*A peak of 2.6 **** was observed at 1531 MeV.*
*Upper limit of the production cross section was obtained to be about 4 ****b which is smaller than most of theoretical calculations.*
*(The analysis was done by K.Miwa (Kyoto))*
# Presentation: 489077

## A Web-based Reporting System

## What is Star Schools

- A program designed to:
-  Encourage improved instruction in:
- mathematics
- science
- foreign languages
- literacy skills
- vocational education

## What is Star Schools (Continued)

- Support under-served pre-school through adult populations, including the:
- disadvantaged
- illiterate
- limited-English proficient
- individuals with disabilities

## What is Star Schools (Continued)

- Do so through the use of:
- telecommunications
- distance education

## Why an Online System	

- Reduces burden on projects
- Promotes collaboration
- Promotes timely reporting
- Provides framework for consolidation of program reporting across ED

## Advantages of an Online System

- More accurate and complete data
- Real-time validation and editing
- Instant feedback about logical inconsistencies
- Data can be entered at different sittings without loss of data

## Advantages (Continued)

- Provides a central data store
- Data can be entered from anywhere at anytime with an internet connection
- Reports can be accessed real-time
- Platforms/browsers are less of an issue than PC- or Mac-specific applications

## More Complete/Accurate Data

- Close-ended versus all open-ended data items
- More standardized reporting
- Status and other reports are available from the beginning of the cycle

## More Complete/Accurate Data (Continued)

- Some data analysis capabilities are available during the entire reporting cycle
- Search capabilities are included
- Data are rolled over from the previous reporting cycle reducing burden

##  Data Validation Online

- Soft versus hard edits
- Context specific error messages
- Instant feedback
- Contact us on every page

## “Quality Data, Quality Decisions”

- Data collection vs data retrieval
- uploading documents
- the web as repository
- specifying data retrieval needs
- Respondent burden vs analysis requirements
- web user’s perception of burden
- purpose of online reporting

## “Quality Data, Quality Decisions (Continued)”

- Diverse audiences vs client
- respondent’s expectation that data will be available
- different users, different roles, different data needs

## “Quality Data, Quality Decisions (Continued)”

- Architecture vs cost
- document management
- search capability
- indexing

## System Architecture

- NT 4.0 Platform
- MS IIS web server
- SQl Server 7.0
- Cold Fusion Server

## Software

- Cold Fusion Studio
- JavaScript
- HTML
- Cascading Style Sheet

## Administrative Features

- User Management
- add/delete users
- generate passwords
- Replication
- Scheduled jobs
- Change or reset status
- Status reports

## Lessons Learned

- Users don’t read instructions
*Other specify* categories will be used
-  It’s important to limit the response to open-ended data items
- Users will cut and paste anything

## Lessons Learned (Continued)

- Need a virtual signature
- Anticipate printing reports
- Cache problems
- Time-out issue
- Browser security settings
- PC versus Mac browsers

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24
# Presentation: 087309

## AP Implications of a Proposed Fix-em for Recent         		  LHC Q1/Q3 Woes

- AP Implications of a Proposed Fix-em for Recent         		  LHC Q1/Q3 Woes
- 	   	     J.A. Johnstone

**Boy Eats Own Head After Radioactive Exploding Magnet Disaster!**

## Q1 Failure During Pressure Test

- “On Tuesday, March 27, structural supports to a Fermilab-built quadrupole magnet, one of an "inner triplet" of three focusing magnets, failed a high-pressure test in the tunnel of the LHC accelerator under construction at CERN. The force generated in the pressure test broke the supports in magnet Q1 that hold the magnet's cold mass in place inside the cryostat, the magnet's outer metal jacket. The support structure broke because it was not designed to withstand the amount of longitudinal force applied during the pressure test.”
- 					*Fermilab Today, April, 2007*

- CERN & Fermilab studied several     potential solutions.
**One solution could produce longitudinal motion of the Q1 & Q3 cold masses by as much as ±3 mm after each quench. These movements would be random, uncorellated, irreproducible, and unmeasurable.**

**What is the impact on the LHC optics?**

## Optics Modeling (Analytic)

- T.Sen, Conf-99-304 (*c.f.  *J.A.Johnstone, TM- 2157, 2001)

- These results are for *one *IP & ∆s = ±3 mm. For 2 IP’s the ß wave could be as bad as ~9.2% and || ~0.012.

## Optics Modeling (Simulation)

-  16 combinations of ∆s = ±3 mm assigned to Q1 & Q3 at IR5 and identical configuration at IR1 (256 combinations if IR1 configured independently; 65,536 possibilities for 4 IR’s!)

- In the ‘worst’ case ∆ßx/ßmax = 13.8% (8.9% rms); ∆ßy/ßmax = 8.2% (3.8% rms). In the ‘average’ case ∆ßx/ßmax = 5.2% (3.4% rms); ∆ßy/ßmax = 3.6% (1.7% rms).

## Simulation II

-  The LHC ß-wave budget is 20%, which could conceivably be consumed entirely by the Q1/Q3 movements at 4 IR’s.
-  The IR’s *could* be re-tuned after every quench to re-match optically to the arcs, but .........

- Residual ß-wave from 1 IP after re-matching in the ‘worst’ case scenario. Gradient changes in the main magnets are ~ a few parts in 10^3 at most.

## The FIX

- To strengthen the support structure of the magnets, cartridges will be attached to one end of the Q1 magnets and to one end of the Q3 magnets.

- The Q1 cold mass with cartridges attached.

-  A review held April 24th - 28th examined proposed repair methods to hold the magnet's cold mass in place inside its cryostat to keep the magnet from moving when it experiences an asymmetric longitudinal force.
-  The solution accepted by the review panel uses four long metal cartridges installed parallel to the magnets long axis. The cartridges will be welded to the magnet's cold mass and to a bracket attached to the cryostat.

## Summary

- Through modeling of the adverse impact of random Q1 & Q3 longitudinal shifts on LHC operations it was possible to help eliminate the cheapie, quick-fix engineering solution.

- 
# Presentation: 883901

## 5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart

**Technical Staff**
- Barry, Peter   4-0704
- 5Bell, Bryan   4-0876
- Ellery, Wendy   3-4050
- 5Perret, Jonathan   4-5438
- White, Mark   3-4173

- .

- 1Agarwal, Shri   4-5598
- Bivins, Gary   3-1888
- Chen, Yuan   3-0940
- Heidecker, Jason   3-7567
- 1Powell, Ed   4-3188
- 5Reed, Erik   4-0681
- Roosta, Ramin   4-7385
- Skinner, James  3-4032
- 1Weiler, James   3-6814

- DXF 04/19/05

**5143: Project Support**
- Menke, Rob   3-7780

**5141: Parts Engineering**** **
- Sheldon, Doug   3-5113

- 1Adams, Jack   4-7744
- Brown, Tom   3-6452
- Cooper, Mark   4-6175
- Erginsoy, Ed   4-5750
- Fernandes, Nayla  3-4175
- Funaiole, Dennis  4-8556
- Franzen, Don   4-1871
- Harris, Cate   3-7278
- Lewis, Dorothy   4-1657
- McClure, Steve   4-0482
- Parks, Michael   4-5813
- Piacentine, Jamie  3-7547
- Sokol, Jeff   3-5469
- Stanford, Kelly   3-6716

- Gallegos, Manny   3-6819
- Johnson, Sid   4-2298
- 5Leon, Rosa   3-9066
- Okuno, James   4-8625
- Petkov, Mihail   4-1715
- Ruiz, Ron   4-2184
- 3Uribe, Jose   4-0322
- Vu, Duc   4-2019

**5145: Reliability & Failure**
**Analysis**
- Smith, Pat   4-8749

**5144:Radiation Effects**
- 5Johnston, Allan   4-6425

- Allen, Greg   3-7558
- Becker, Heidi   3-5491
- Benali, Simo   3-7525
- Chavez, Rosa   3-6895
- Edmonds, Larry   4-2778
- 1Farmanesh, Farhad   3-5498
- Guertin, Steve   4-1637
- Irom, Farokh   4-7463
- Laird, Jamie  4-6167
- Langley, Tilan (LOA)
- Miyahira, Tets   4-2908
- Nguyen, Duc   4-8554
- O’Connor, Mike   4-5595
- Patterson, Jeff   3-6872
- Rax, Bernie   4-9799
- Scheick, Leif   4-3272
- 3Selva, Luis   4-5751
- 1Solario, Joe   3-6815
- 5Swift, Gary   4-5059
- Thorbourn, Dennis   4-1830

**5140 Electronic Parts Engineering – Organization Chart**

_**Parts Reps**_
- Drake, Debbie   4-6335
- Ellis, Kristan   4-1636
- Pardiwala, Chandra  3-7250
- 1Piacentine, Joe   3-7208
_**Parts Screening**_
_**Coordinator**_
- Island, Denise   3-4144
_**Order Desk**_
- West, Gary   3-0945
- Wono, Carolina   3-6818
_**Flight Storekeeper**_
- 1Dominguez, Alice   4-5425
- 1Lovers, Corey   4-5425
- 1Stiebel, Richard  4-5425

**5142: Parts Acquisition**** **
- Chiang, Nancy   4-0949

*JPL - 72*
- 1*CAT-A - 12*
- 2*CAT-X - 00*
- 3*APX - 02*
- 5*Principal - (6)*
*Total – 84*

- .

- 3Fong, Danny   4-4183
- Mayo-Cupples, Linda 4-0721
- Odell, Dorice   3-1057

**5146:Parts Process Mgmt**
- vacant

**Executive Management**
- Evans, Kristan – Manager   3-0775
- Schöne, Harald - Deputy Manager 3-1736
- [Rowe, DiDi – Secretary   4-5591]

- .

- Berumen, Yvette   4-5723
- 1Joiner, Tabitha  3-9010
- Rowe, DiDi   4-5591
- Westgate, Joan   4-9529
- Wilde, Kathie   3-6031
- 1Wilson, Amy   3-1770
- Yang, Flora   3-4737

- .

**5147: Administrative Staff**
- Chilicki, Michael   4-3222

- [Wilson, Amy   3-1770]

- [Wilde, Kathie   3-6031]

- [Westgate, Joan   4-9529]

- [Westgate, Joan   4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy  3-1770]

- [Westgate, Joan   4-9529]

- [Wilson, Amy – Sec’y   3-1770]
# Presentation: 009397

## The Wind from the Sun

**Why did you like or dislike this story?**
**Is it scientifically valid/truthful?**
**Could there be such a solar yacht race?  How soon?**
**Bonus question: why are the ships named as they are?**

## How might you use stories and art in a science class?	

- Pre-assessment
- Post-assessment
- Inject some fun -- throw them off of their expectations
- Opportunity for library and web research
- Chance to connect science to history and  culture

## Why do such interdisciplinary activity?

- Break down the walls between science and other subjects
- Involve and energize some students who are not typically interested in science
- Writing stories or creating art/music usually requires a deeper understanding of what is going on
- Way to make the science relevant, personal

## Ideas for Interdisciplinary Science

- Writing short stories -- require that they be scientifically correct -- or news stories
- Create a myth or legend
- Poetry and song lyrics
- Critique a work of art or literature
- Create a mission to Mars, Mercury, etc.
- Develop a game
- Create a piece of art -- Sun-Earth system
- Video -- commercials, weather-cast

## Cool facts from “Wind”

- Woomera: Stick used by Aborigines to throw spears.  Also: rocket and missile testing at the Woomera Range
- Pyotr Nikolayevich Lebedev -- Russian physicist who demonstrated experimentally the minute pressure that light exerts on bodies
- Captain Joshua Slocum was the first man to sail around the world alone
- Arachne
- Story written in 1963
# Presentation: 018424

## 100

- _[100](slide2.xml)_

- _[200](slide4.xml)_

- _[300](slide6.xml)_

- _[500](slide10.xml)_

- _[400](slide8.xml)_

- Da Bomb

- _[100](slide12.xml)_

- _[200](slide14.xml)_

- _[300](slide16.xml)_

- 500

- _[400](slide18.xml)_

- Before/After
- 1945

- 200

- 300

- 500

- 400

- Does it
- Glow

- 200

- 300

- 500

- 400

- The Atom

- 200

- 300

- 500

- 400

- Elemental

- 200

- 300

- 500

- 400

## Winner of first Nobel Prize in Physics

## Who is William Roetgen (1901)?

## Winner of both Physics and Chemistry Nobel Prizes

## Who is Marie Curie (Physics, 1903; Chemistry 1911)

## Co-discoverer of more than 10 trans-uranium elements

## Who is Glenn Seaborg (Chemistry, 1951)?

## Atomic number 102

## What is Nobelium?

## Detection of solar neutrinos

## Who is Ray Davis (Physics, 2002)?

## Scientific director of the Manhattan Project

## Who is J. Robert Oppenheimer?

## Location of first nuclear explosion

## Where is Trinity (Alamogordo, NM)?

## “Little boy” fuel

## What is uranium?

## Location of the Manhattan braintrust

## Where is Los Alamos, NM?

## Manhattan Project director

## Who is General Leslie Groves (former construction direction for the Pentagon)?

## Sustained fission reaction

## What is before?(1942, Enrico Fermi)

## Cyclotron discovery

## What is before?(1929, EO Lawrence)

## Bubble Chamber

## What is after?(1950, Don Glaser)

## Van de Graff Accelerator

## What is before?(1929, R.J. van de Graff)

## Nuclear Shell Model

## What is after?(1950, Goeppert-Mayer and Jensen)

## Discoverer of x-rays

## Who is William Roetgen (1895)?

## Discovered natural radioactivity from uranium

## Who is Henri Becquerel (1897)?

## Discovered natural radioactivity from Th, Po, and Ra

## Who are Marie and Pierre Curie (1898)?

## Discovered alpha and beta “rays” from uranium

## Who is Ernst Rutherford (1899)?

## Credited with discovery of gamma radiation

## Who is Paul Villard (1900)?(note, only one who did not win Nobel prize)

## Modern concept of the atom

## Who is John Dalton?

## Atoms occupy quantized energy states

## Who is Niels Bohr (1914)?

## Determined the atom was mostly empty space

## Who is Ernst Rutherford (1911)?

## Discovered the electron

## Who is JJ Thomson (1897)?

## Discovered the neutron

## Who is James Chadwick (1932)?

## Highest proton number of a naturally occurring element

## What is uranium (Z=92)?

## Two unstable elements below lead

## What are Pm (Z=61) and Tc (Z=43)?

## Most abundant element in the universe

## What is hydrogen (Z=1)?

## Highest-Z synthesized to date

## What is Z=116 (at Dubna, 2001)?

## Highest-Z for which chemistry is known

## What is Hs (Z=108) (at Berkeley, 2001)?
# Presentation: 009866

## Office of Technology Strategy

April Giles
15 February 2006

**April Giles**
**15 February 2006**

*FIPS 201 Evaluation Program*

## Presentation Agenda

- Card/Reader Interoperability Task
- Lab Development Task
- Call for Industry Support
- ?’s

##    Card/Reader Interoperability Task

- Update
- 2/3 complete
- FIPS 201 Category List revised
- 19 remaining categories
- Categories Mapped to RTM
- Reader categories by use case
- Test fixture prototype developed
- Card/reader requirements on 4th draft
- Next major milestone
- Card/reader interoperability requirement validation

##    Lab Development Task

- Update
- 1/6 complete
- CONOPS completed
- CM Plan completed
- Approval Procedure Template completed
- Next major milestone
- Web enabled information source review

##  Call for Industry Support

- Evaluation Program Technical Working Group (EPTWG)
- More technical input from reader & card manufacturers desired
- Starting Subgroup for reader & card technical representatives
- Weekly, in person, whiteboard meetings
- March thru end of April
- Review/comment/revise reader & card test procedures
- Engineers preferred

## Questions ?

- April Giles
- _Contact information:_
- Email:	_[april.giles@gsa.gov](mailto:april.giles@gsa.gov)_
- Website: _http://www.smart.gov/fips201apl_
- Phone:	1.202.501.1123
# Presentation: 667869

## Per-Minute Access Chargesto long distance companies

*Rates for 1996 through 1998 from Telecommunications Industry Revenue: 1998, Table 10.  *
*Remaining rates for ILEC price cap carriers, from CALLS Analysis, May 25, 2000.  Rates are for both ends of a typical conversation minute.*

## Interstate Long Distance Ratesby consumer price index

***Access Charge***
***Reductions***

**July ‘97**
**$1.9 billion**

**July ‘98**
**$800 million**

**July ‘99**
**$500 million**

**July ‘00**
**$3.2 **
**billion**

## FCC YEAR 2000 SAVINGS

**Estimated Savings for Low-Volume Customers Using AT&T’s Basic Schedule Rates**

***	******Dear Mr/Ms Zero User:***
***	******	******Under the FCC plan, you have saved $4.71 MONTHLY ***
***	******and $56.52 ANNUALLY.  Your summary is as follows:***

_**Account Summary**_**	****Minutes of Calling Per Month: 0**

**Long Distance Charges****	****	****	****Before****	****	****After**
**	****Minimum Usage Charge****	****	****$3.00****	****	****$0.00**
**	****Charges for Calls Made****	****	****$0.00****	****	****$0.00**
**USF****	****	****	****	****	****$1.38****	****	****$0.00**
**PICC****	****	****	****	****	****$1.51****	****	****$0.00**
**	****Long Distance Total****	****	****$5.89****	****	****$0.00**

**Local Charges****	****	**
**SLC****	****	****	****	****	****$3.50****	****	****$4.35**
**USF****	****	****	****	****	****$0.00****	****	****$0.33**
**	****Local Total****	****	****	****$3.50****	****	****$4.68****	**

***Grand Total******	******	******	******	******$9.39******	******	******$4.68******	***

***CUSTOMER SAVES.....50%***

## FCC YEAR 2000 SAVINGS

**Estimated Savings for Low-Volume Customers Using AT&T’s Basic Schedule Rates**

***	******Dear Mr/Ms Light User:***
***	******	******Under the FCC plan, you have saved $2.52 MONTHLY ***
***	******and $30.24 ANNUALLY.  Your summary is as follows:***

_**Account Summary**_**	****Minutes of Calling Per Month: 10**

**Long Distance Charges****	****	****	****Before****	****	****After**
**	****Minimum Usage Charge****	****	****$3.00****	****	****$0.00**
**	****Charges for Calls Made****	****	****$0.00****	****	****$2.00**
**USF****	****	****	****	****	****$1.38****	****	****$0.19**
**PICC****	****	****	****	****	****$1.51****	****	****$0.00**
**	****Long Distance Total****	****	****$5.89****	****	****$2.19**

**Local Charges****	****	**
**SLC****	****	****	****	****	****$3.50****	****	****$4.35**
**USF****	****	****	****	****	****$0.00****	****	****$0.33**
**	****Local Total****	****	****	****$3.50****	****	****$4.68****	**

***Grand Total******	******	******	******	******$9.39******	******	******$6.87******	***

***CUSTOMER SAVES.....27%***