BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 486182

## D0 Status: 05/06-05/13

- Week integrated luminosity
- 3.5pb-1 delivered
- 2.1pb-1  utilized (60%)
- Data collection
- global data collections during each store
- full detector in readout: 5mln events collected
- physics trigger menu: v5.1
- v7.0 tried, but backed due to data corruption
- major sources of downtime last week
- DAQ system/L2/on-line debugging
- sub-detectors readout problems
- special runs collected
- L2 calorimeter trigger test
- Access last week
- 9(!) jobs accumulated over Monday-Wednesday
- muon HV problem in 4 PDTs
- muon firmware upgrade
- CFT AFE installation, firmware debugging
- LVPS swaps
- others
- Currently no requests for the hall access

- Dmitri Denisov

## Background Conditions

- Plot of the D0 luminosity, p and p-bar halo last week
- halo is stable and within acceptable limits

- Dmitri Denisov

## D0 Detector Status

- Luminosity detector
- stable operation
- Silicon detector
- silicon detector is running well (1 out of 8 LVPS is OFF)
- high voltage turn OFF time is down to ~3 minutes
- this is time we need to end stores gracefully
- Fiber tracker
- fully instrumented with electronics and in global readout
- finishing temperature stabilization upgrade for all AFEs
- working on CFT and CPS commissioning
- populating forward preshower detector with AFE boards
- Calorimeter
- stable operation
- Muon system
- stable operation
- fixed two HV problems last week
- both related to metal pcs fallen into the chambers HV compartments
- Forward Proton Detector
- routine pots insertion during stores
- integrating with calorimeter shifts
- Trigger
- L1 trigger is running stable
- L2 trigger is finishing full integration - talk by Reinhard Schwienhorst
- L3 trigger: calorimeter algorithm is running well, while attempt to include muon filtering did not succeed  last week

- Dmitri Denisov

## Stability of the D0 Solenoid Field

- Design field is 2T monitored by power supply current, hall probes, and NMR probe
- current stability is 1/4749 or 2.10-4
- ield stability is 2 Gauss at 20 kGauss or 1.10-4
- Direct measurement of K0 mass is accurate within 0.5% (current mass error limit)

- Dmitri Denisov

## This Week D0 Run Plan

- Global data collection today and tomorrow
- During accelerator studies
- calibrations for different sub-systems
- installation of muon MFC cards
- multi-buffer firmware  download into tracking crates (major reason for current front-end busy fraction)
- Level 2 system commissioning
- on-line cluster software release
- Continue physics data taking with full detector in readout starting owl shift Thursday
- global trigger list v5.1
- Level 2 rejection on “copies” of muon triggers
- readout rate 100Hz (or more if multi-buffer fully implemented)
- rate to tape ~30-40Hz
- Planning day-by-day schedule for June shutdown
- ready to start access on June 3rd (or earlier)
- planning to accomplish critical jobs within 12 days

- Dmitri Denisov
# Presentation: 492938

## Z39.50 and W3C XML QL 

**Mark Needleman****	**
**Data Research Associates, Inc**
**ZIG Meeting**
**December 2000**

## XML QL

**Query Language Only**
**Formal Data Model and Algebra**
**May Have multiple syntaxes - but 1 language**
**Protocol Independent**
**May embed some of the functionality of Z39.50 directly into the language**

## Z39.50

**More than just a Query Language - a protocol with supporting infrastructure**
**Z39.50 model supports multiple types of queries**
**Provides session management**
**Provides result set management**
**Provides supporting information retrieval functionality beyond the query**

## XML Ql vs Z39.50

**QL - XML based (at least one syntax)**
**Z39.50 ASN.1/BER based**
**QL - Protocol Independent**
**Z39.50 - Very much protocol dependent**
**QL - all functionality provided for and expressed in the query language**
**Z39.50- provides supporting information retrieval functionality beyond the query**
**QL - A De facto standard?**
**Z39.50 - An “official” standard**

## Possible Futures

**Add QL as one more Query type in Z39.50?**
**Abandon Z39.50  and just use functionality and model provided by QL? **
**Some combination of the two?**

## Z39.50 in the Future?

**Retain  concepts and model  of information retrieval provided by current protocol expressed using XML QL but run over a more modern transport like HTTP and/or XML Protocol**
# Presentation: 662815

## Phase Shifter Power Test

- Main Parameters and
-    Expected Performance
- Test setup at A0
- Unexpected Performance
-     and Main Test Results
- Possible Program of a Not-Very-Distant Future Work

## Main Parameters

**Coil cross section area – 760.262 mm****2**
**Wire cross-section area – 76.48 mm****2**

## Global Coil Parameters

**Global Coil Parameters**
- -         Coil length – 5.5 m x 4;
- -         Coil resistance (calculated)– 0.00125 Ohm x 4 = 0.006 Ohm;
- -         Coil resistance (measured)– 6V / 1000 A = 0.006 Ohm
- Power required (1000 Amp) –6000 W
- -         Coil inductance – 40 H x 4 = 160 H
- -         Voltage – 6 V

## Slide 4

## Magnetic Field 

- Calculated Magnetic Field

- Measured Magnetic Field

## High Power Test Configuration

- Phase and Amplitude of the Forward and Reflected power was measures using the existing equipment at A0

- mm
- cr mm
- wg mm

## Reflected Power Gauge Calibration

## Test Results1. Low Power - 100 kW

## Test Results2. Phase Shift vs Power

## Test Results3. Performance in SF6

## Program of  Work to Consider. 1

- Make a thorough write-up with all significant steps reflected:
- Ivan – calculations and optimization
- Temir – low power and high power measurements
- Yuri – design issues, magnetic system, and high power test

## Program of  Work to Consider. 2

- 1

- 1. Optimize length, number and position of ferrite blocks to get maximal efficiency of the phase shifter

## Program of  Work to Consider. 3

- Make average power (thermal) measurements using up to 5000 W CW input. Compare with the model.

- Use epoxy to attach YIG blocks;
- Try  soldering technique;
- Find proper diagnostic tools
- CW operation is possible (what about TWT ??)

## Program of  Work to Consider. 4

- Start planning pulsed measurements:
-  1.     Define working zone of the magnetic system and **design and built** a ferrite-based magnetic system. The design must be compatible with a source of pulsed power for the phase control (~25V, ~100 A).
-       2.    Find / build / buy an appropriate power supply
-       3.   Make a waveguide suitable for pulsed operation - AC magnetic field must penetrate: design, and test.
-       4.   Make low level and high power level measurements of a fast phase shifting properties. Need to find **an alternative way to monitor phase and amplitude** and obtain frequency characteristics of the device, including delay time.

## Program of  Work to Consider. 5

-    Modeling the work of the system in a feedback loop
-     1. Make a mockup cavity that has an adequate ringing capability.
-      2.  Develop / build / procure a power amplifier(s).
-      3.     Build the second phase shifter
-      4.  Find a phase comparator.
-      5. Check the work of the system making low power level measurements.
-      6.  Can we make measurements using high level RF? Finally we need to, maybe using SMTF as a test stand.
# Presentation: 244967

## Performance Tested Comfort System
Program Update

January 24, 2007

- Program Update
- January 24, 2007

## PTCS Status

- Measures Installed
- Training
- Quality Assurance Visits
- Ecos Consulting Perspective
- Utility Perspective

## Slide 3

## PTCS Measures Installed - Public Utilities

- 18 Public utilities have reported over 500 measures
- FY06*:  182 duct sealing, 115 heat pump
- FY07:   199 duct sealing, 43 heat pump
- 	*BPA’s fiscal year is Oct 1-Sep 30
- State distribution of Public Utilities
- Oregon: 365 duct sealing; 125 heat pumps (10% qualify for tax credit)
- Washington: 15 duct sealing; 14 heat pumps
- Idaho, Kootenai: 1 duct sealing; 10 heat pumps
- Conservative savings estimate
- Duct Sealing + Heat Pump commissioning = 0.2 aMW, to date

## Other Regional Programs

- Idaho Power duct sealing program:  over 430 mobile homes
- CheckMe:  over 130 heat pumps
- EWEB
- Emerald PUD
- Other?

## Training Sessions

- Completed
- 6 duct sealing
- 8 heat pump commissioning
- Requests pending
- 7 duct sealing
- 9 heat pump commissioning
- January 2007, added $17,600 to training budget
- Contact
- Jennifer Williamson (503) 525-2700 ext 103  or jwilliamson@ecosconsulting.com
- Martin Wilson (503) 525-2700 ext 140 or mwilson@ecosconsulting.com

## Future Training 

- To be scheduled
- Skamania & Cascade Locks
- Idaho Falls (area)
- Ravalli & Mission Valley
- Canby & Monmouth
- Central Lincoln & Drain
- Work with Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance to share training
- Ellensburg
- Port Angeles (duct sealing)
- Idaho Falls

## Training Costs

- Cost Sharing Options (after the first training session)
- Flat reimbursement for verified attendance
- Training costs shared equally by BPA and participating utilities
- Utilities are welcome to contact Ecos Consulting directly to arrange self-funded training
- Certified Technicians are welcome to contact the Alliance regarding other training opportunities and costs

## Quality Assurance Visits

- Ecos Consulting is preparing a quality assurance (QA) implementation plan
- As many as 50 QA visits, based on measures claimed
- High volume certified technicians with high savings potential
- Central Electric
- EWEB
- Springfield

## Utility Perspectives  

- What is working
- Opportunities for improvement
- PTR system upgrades coming in February
# Presentation: 000290

## Welcome to the Eastern Region LaboratoryProcedures ManualERLPM

- Guillermo Felix
- FAA – Eastern Region
- Paving Engineer
- March 17-19, 2008

## Workshop Objectives

- Present concept for pavement design and the structural function of various layers
- Present an understanding of material characteristics and principles for mix design to satisfy loading and environmental conditions.  Marshall design and Superpave
- Discuss purpose and principles to measure the quality of mixing and placing asphaltic materials (Quality Assurance)

## Workshop objectives

- Discuss principles and practices for sampling and testing bituminous mixes
- Explain statistical methods to determine quality of materials and pay factors
- Present Contractor testing to control the quality of the mixes (Quality Control)
- What happen after this workshop?

## Criteria for Pavement Design

- Loads: Expressed in aircraft weight and
- Aircraft annual departures (passes)
- Soil strength: expressed as a relation to a standard soil for flexible pavement design.  California Bearing Ratio (CBR)

## Surface course, P-401

- Base course –stabilized or not

- Sub base course

- Sub grade – prepared support

## Aircraft weight for P-401

- Less than 12,500  (Highway Spec)
- 12,500 lbs. but less than 60,000 Lbs.
- 60,000 Lbs or more

## WHAT IS P-401?

- Surface course and defined by AC 150-5320-6
- Specification that details de quality of the surface course

## What is P-403?

- Specification for Stabilized Bituminous Base Course
- Binder Course
- Truing and Leveling Courses
- Testing requirement has been reduced

## What is the ERLPM

- Eastern Region Laboratory procedures Manual
- Born in the Eastern Region to use statistical methods to determine quality vs range or media (average)
- Origen – Military specs, now MS-2
- Document to be used in combination with P-401.  required in Eastern region
- Provide forms for project submittal - Appendices

## AGENDA

- Mix Design – Jim Smith/Chris Brower/Rodney Joel
- Random Sampling- Guillermo Felix
- Quality Acceptance (Marshall) – Ken Rowbotham
- Statistical Analysis – Carl Steinhauer
- Computer Software – Guillermo Felix
- Contractor’s Quality Control – Cindy LeFleur
- ERLPM Test and List - Guillermo

## How many of you are

- Consultants?
- Testing laboratories?
- Contractors?
- Material supplier?
- Government?

## Questions?

- Let’s welcome Jim and Chris
# Presentation: 142691

## THE LANCE MEMO

**THE LANCE MEMO**
**(ESA CONSULTATION)**

## ESA DUTIES

**ESA DUTIES**

**Notes:**
NOT JEOPARDIZE THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF AN ENDANGERED SPECIES OR RESULT IN THE DESTRUCTION OR ADVERSE MODIFICATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT – MUST USE BASED AVAIALBE SCIENTFIC AND COMMERCIAL DATA – 7(A) (2) – NO REQUIREMENT TO AVOID MINIMIZE MITIGATE

## Federal Highways Role and Responsibility

**TIME**
**CONTENT**
**ROLES**
**RESPONSIBLIITES**

## WHO STARTS THE 

**WHO STARTS THE **
**CLOCK ?**

**Notes:**
Formal Consultation vs informal consultation

## REQUIRMENTS IN ESA REGS

**REQUIRMENTS IN ESA REGS**

**Notes:**
INFORMAL – NO CLOCK  / FORMAL 30 DAY – 90 DAY – 135 DAY 

## WHO

**WHO**
**CAN **
**EXTEND**
**THE **
**TIME?**

**Notes:**
TIME EXTENSION GETS CONFUSED WITH MORE DATA BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN GUIDANCE

## WHO DETERMINES THE CONTENT OF BAs

**WHO DETERMINES THE CONTENT OF BAs**

## FHWA DOES

**FHWA DOES**
**( WITH CERTAIN REQUIRMENTS)**

**Notes:**
6 ITEMS REQUIRED TO START THE CLOCK AND BEST AVAIABLE SCIENTIFIC AND COMMERCIAL DATA

## Requests

- For
- More
- Information
- By
- Services

**Notes:**
They can only ask for time – IF we say OK – then more data can be produced – Formal – requests need to be made within 90 days- Services cannot state that BA is inadequate

## MUST

**MUST**
**IMPEMENT **_**ALL**_** **_**Terms and Conditions**_
_**Reinitiation if**_

## The Services Role and Responsibilities

**The Services Role and Responsibilities**

## CONSULT WITH US

## LETTERS

**LETTERS**
**OF**
**CONCURRENCE**
**Biological**
**Opinions**
**Incidental **
**Take**
**Statements**

## We NEED to

**We NEED to**
**Work **
**Together**
**(happily is good)**
# Presentation: 832943

## Tunable Diode Lasers And Systems For Airborne Atmospheric Studies

**S**mall
**B**usiness
**I**nnovation
**R**esearch

**Laser Components Instrument Group, Inc.**

- Wilmington, MA

**ACCOMPLISHMENTS**
-  Delivered diode lasers capable of operating in the mid infrared range of the spectrum which is optimal for atmospheric gas studies
-  Extended MBE-grown laser device capability to the 9.5 micron region of the spectrum
-  Laser diodes make lighter weight spectrometers possible for NASA atmospheric studies
-  **COMMERCIALIZATION**
-  Sales to JPL for the construction of atmospheric study instruments
-  Technical advances have been incorporated into manufacturing processes for other laser products at laser components instrument group

**GOVERNMENT/ SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
-  Flown on a number of NASA ER-2 aircraft and NASA balloon missions to study trace gases in the upper atmosphere
-  Used in test beds to develop technology for future  NASA science missions

***ER-2 Aircraft Carries Instruments to High Altitudes***
***for Atmospheric Studies***

- 1991 Phase II; NAS7-1242
- Success Story # 7-023

- Jet Propulsion Laboratory

**INNOVATION**
- Laser diodes for airborne spectrometers used in the
- detection of environmentally important gases in the atmosphere

## Slide 2
# Presentation: 021237

## Beam Preparations

*Completed target –horn beam alignment Friday morning with good results*
*Operational sign-offs Friday evening*
*Removed target hall crane electronics Saturday AM*
*In queue for beam start-up for some time due to TeV F-sector ground fault problem*
- _NuMI Beam start-up Sunday 0600_
*Good running until ~ 2300 when have permit trip from Horn 1 RAW expansion tank level.*
*Problem began shortly after  had been running beam for 6 hours.  Symptom is air in water return line from the horn newly installed..  Believe problem is a leaky seal which opened up as the system became warmer from beam operation.  Water recovers to the expansion tank after beam is turned off.*

- _Horn 1 Problem_
- Current belief is that the new air leak is fixable by replacing the line and ejector pump – which can be done from above the horn shield module. If so, do NOT have to remove horn again (or target).
- This afternoon, replacing crane electronics, then will move 12 concrete R blocks to make this area accessible.
- Look to doing the repair tomorrow. Then restart beam Wed. evening, or Thurs.

## Slide from J. Hylen AEM June 2. 

- Slide from J. Hylen AEM June 2.

- Replace
- now

## Slide 4
# Presentation: 531438

## Earth, Lunar and Planetary Environments (Session D)

- Key questions:
- -What we know
- -What we don’t know (and need to know for VSE)
- -How do we address the above?
- For:
- -Earth environment
- -Lunar Orbit and Surface
- -Mars Orbit and Surface

## Earth, Lunar and Planetary Environments-Earth Environment Issues Outline

- *Radiation Belts
- -LEO and GEO models
- -Observational archives
- -COSPAR reference list
- *Plasma Environment
- -Observational Archives
- -spacecraft charging models
- *Upper atmosphere, ionos.
- -var. statistical models
- -Observational archives

- *Rad Belts, Plasma, Atmos,Ionos
- -dynamical models (validated)
- -extremes models and predictive models (incl. heavy ions)
- HOW DO WE ADDRESS THE  ABOVE?
- *Data resource mining tools
- *Model-targeted missions (e.g. LWS RBMP, ITMP), with continued L1 monitor
- *dynamical/extremes model devel., +coupled system models devel.

- WHAT WE KNOW

- WHAT WE DON’T KNOW (AND
- NEED TO KNOW)

## Earth, Lunar and Planetary Environments-Lunar Orbit and Surface Issues Outline

- *Mission results from:
- -Explorer 35 and Apollo (data lost? docs only on SEP events and event shadows, dosimetry from Apollo, mag fields, dust, meteors)
- -Clementine (SEP events and shadows, dosimetry, surface composition-data are limited, access not gen. open)
- -Lunar Prospector (SEP events in ER backgrounds, shadowing, mag fields, surface composition, neutrons, alphas)
- -Geotail (SEP events below a few MeV in transits of Lunar orbit)
- -WIND (few flybys- plasmas, mag fields)
- *Models- surface neutrons based on  measured surface composition

- *How different is lunar space environment from interplanetary?
- *Comprehensive lunar surface environment measurements and models
- *Details of surface composition
- *Need to revisit lessons learned from
-  Expl. 35, Apollo, Clementine
- *Relevant data sets restoration and mining
- *LRO and dedicated lunar space environment orbiter
- *Lunar Lander measurements of radiation, dust, micrometeorites, E fields/surfaces charging, gases
- *Solar wind/Sheath/Magnetosphere Interaction with Moon models
- *Samples for rad history analysis

- WHAT WE DON’T KNOW (AND
- NEED TO KNOW)

- WHAT WE KNOW

**HOW DO WE ADDRESS THE ABOVE?**

## Session D Meeting Plans

- Today (Tues) PM session- outline/discussion of Mars orbit and surface environment and “other planets” and asteroids environments issues
- Wed- brief presentations aimed toward the 3 key questions from session participants*, discussion, and  draft report/input for steering committee + any desired combined session splinters
-   * *Earth* *Rad belts (Reeves), Earth Upper Atmosphere (Lu, Woods), LRO (Spence), surface neutrons (Clowdsley), Mars surface rad (Hassler), Lunar rad env (Lee), Lunar Electric fields/dust/charging (Guild, Delory), SEPs in Mars orbit env (Delory, Luhmann), Earth and Mars SEP predictions (Turner, Fry)*
# Presentation: 790862

## OMI DOAS Total Ozone Column  v1.0.1 vs v0.9.4Pepijn VeefkindMark kroonKNMIAura Science Team MeetingWorkshop on Total Ozone Products 12 August 2006

## Highlights of v1.0.1

- Fixed Solar Irradiance to reduce striping; on our way to Time Dependent Operational Parameter File (TDOPF) implementation;
- The improved L1B quality flags are used (reduces the striping).
- New value of the albedo for snow covered land areas is used (0.6), however, not used for permanent snow/ice fields.
- The cloud fraction is computed internally.
- Improved cloud pressure information from OMCLDO2 v1.0.1 .
**OMDOAO3 version 1.01 processing from orbit 6541 onwards**
**(> 07 October 2005)**

## Fixed Solar Irradiance

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 Total Ozone Column 14-27 October 2005**

- Total Ozone Column [DU]

- <>= 279 DU
-   =  64.4 DU
-     =   -0.153

## Fixed Solar Irradiance

**OMI DOAS v0.9.4 Total Ozone Column 14-27 October 2005**

- Total Ozone Column [DU]

- <>= 284 DU
-   =  65.5 DU
-     =   -0.146

## Fixed Solar Irradiance

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 - v0.9.4 TO3C 14-27 October 2005**

- Ozone Column Difference [DU]

- <>= -4.55 DU
-   =  5.54 DU
-     = -1.16

## Cloud Fraction

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 Cloud Fraction 14-27 October 2005**

- Effective Cloud Fraction

- <>= 0.417
-   = 0.371
-     = 0.511

## Cloud Fraction

**OMI DOAS v0.9.4 Cloud Fraction 14-27 October 2005**

- Effective Cloud Fraction

- <>= 0.363
-   = 0.286
-     = 0.509

## Cloud Fraction

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 – v0.9.4 CldFrc 14-27 October 2005**

- Effective Cloud Fraction Difference

- <>=  0.054
-   =  0.271
-     = -0.537

## Cloud Height

- Effective Cloud Pressure [hPa]

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 Cloud Pressure 14-27 October 2005**

- <>= 782 hPa
-   = 179 hPa
-     =  -0.981

## Cloud Height

- Effective Cloud Pressure [hPa]

**OMI DOAS v0.9.4 Cloud Pressure 14-27 October 2005**

- <>= 828 hPa
-   = 153 hPa
-     =  -0.256

## Cloud Height

- Effective Cloud Pressure Difference [hPa]

**OMI DOAS v1.0.1 – v 0.9.4 CldPress 14-27 October 2005**

- <>=  -46 hPa
-   = 109 hPa
-     =  -3.09

## Solar Zenith Angle

## Statistics

**R = 0.997**
**S = 0.980 / 1.01**

**R = 0.688**
**S = 0.892 / 0.531**

## Plans for the next release 2006/2007

- New AMF tables to solve the SZA dependence.	*Issue has been identified, implementation is being tested.*
- Back to daily irradiance files when TDOPF is in place.
- Improve treatment of snow/ice areas.
- Investigate different ozone cross sections.
- (Always watch for) Bug fixes.
**A new version is planned for the next OMI reprocessing (Collection 3), planned for 2007.**
# Presentation: 524104

## TES ozone sensitivity:0-5 km layer

- John Worden and the TES team
- Presented by Annmarie Eldering

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**

## Averaging Kernels for Ozone

**100-500 hPa**
**500-1000 hPa**

**Averaging Kernels for Ozone**

**Notes:**
TES averaging kernels under clear and cloudy conditions. The colors indicate averaging kernel rows corresponding to the pressure levels as noted in the legend. These plots demonstrate how vertical smoothing in TES retrievals combines the information from different altitudes, in particular how stratospheric information can affect the upper troposphere. Associated values for DOFS (degrees of freedom for signal) are also indicated for each case.

## The analysis

- From the averaging kernels (AK), calculate the sum of diagonals of AK (also called degree of freedom) for altitudes between 0 and 5 km.
- For each season, will show the probability distribution function

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**

-    Second plot focuses on where dofs (trace(A)) is greater than 0.4 – will show latitudinal distribution
-    Three years of data in analysis

## Springtime sensitivity stats

**Project Status Report**

**Springtime sensitivity stats**

**ocean**

**land**

## Summer Sensitivity

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**

## Fall Sensitivity

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**

## Winter Sensitivity

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**

## Summary

- TES has more than 0.4 degrees of freedom to signal in the 0-5km layer about 20% of the time
- Latitudinal distribution depends on amount of ozone, surface characteristics, but primarily thermal contrast

**June 8, 2006**

**Project Status Report**
# Presentation: 294002

## Nanoscale Photosynthesis,

- the Photophysics of Neural
- Cells, and Artificial Sight

**Elias Greenbaum**
**Chemical Sciences Division**
**Oak Ridge National Laboratory**
**Oak Ridge, Tennessee**

## Acknowledgements

**Mark S. Humayun**
**James W. Lee**
**Ida Lee**
**Tanya Kuritz**
**Charlene Sanders**
**Miguel Rodriguez, Jr.**
**Barry Bruce**
**Jennifer Millsaps**

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## H2

**Ascorbic Acid**

**Plastocyanin**

**Platinum**

**H****2**

**Light**

- Platinized Photosystem I Experiment

**e****-**

**e****-**

**H****+**

**H****+**

**H****+**

**[PtCl****6****]****2****–**** + 4*****e*****–**** ******** ****Pt******** + 6Cl ****–**

## Differences in H2 Yield With Decreasing Chl Concentration

**Differences in H****2**** Yield With Decreasing Chl Concentration**

**Light on**

**Light off**

**Light on**

**Light off**

**Light on**

**Light off**

## PSI  on a  Heterostructure

## Measurement of Electrostatic Potential in Nanometer-Resolution:  Schematic Illustration Kelvin Probe Method in Lift Mode

## AFM and KFM Images of PS I Reaction Centers

**AFM and KFM Images of PS I Reaction Centers**
** ****Immobilized on Gold**

## Slide 11

## PS I Photovoltage Topography:  Summary of Three Types of Measurements

**The vertical arrows in above figure indicate three selected voltage points we used in this table: the two extremities and the center.**

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Conceptual Illustration of Idea

## WERI-RbI retinoblastoma cells

**WERI-RbI retinoblastoma cells**

## Spectral Properties of System

## THE STRATEGY

**Use of liposomes as a vector for PSI delivery into mammalian cells**
**Stabilization of proteoliposomes through surface modification**
**Targeted delivery through affinity to specific cell receptors**

## FIRST STEP: 

**PSI RECONSTITUTION INTO PROTEOLIPOSOMES**

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## AFM-SSPM Studies of PSI-Proteoliposomes

## NEXT STEP: PSI INCORPORATION INTO MAMMALIAN CELLS

## Kinetic Time Course Experiments in the Presence and Absence of PSI and External Calcium

## Bimodal Distribution of Fluorescence Signals in the Presence and Absence of External Calcium

## Photosystem I

**Photosystem I**
**Energetics and Kinetics**

- After Chitnis, P. R., “Photosystem I: Function and Physiology”*Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.* 52:593* (*2001)

## Slide 27

## Slide 28

## Electronic Properties of Immobilized PSI

- The Orientation of individual PSI reaction centers can be determined by the measurement of the I-V curve from the scanning tunneling spectroscopy.
# Presentation: 681800

## INNOVATIVE HIGH SPEED MODEM FOR

-   Developed the first commercially available 155 Mbps ASIC-		based modulator and demodulator to enable next generation 		wideband video and data services
-   Advanced the state of the art in modulation and coding 		technology demonstrating significant power and bandwidth 		efficient operation in a single integrated circuit
-   Set the stage for successful integration of bandwidth on 		demand into home and office via inexpensive wireless 		modems
**COMMERCIALIZATION**
-   $5M in Phase II monies through 1997 from SiCOM and 		Quantum Partners, LLC
-   Sales projections are $3M for 1998 and $8M for 1999
-   Projected 1998 -1999 growth from 47 to 100 (116%) employees
-   Companies that use or have placed orders for BitFLOW 155 		Mbps modems include R. E. America, Andrew Corp., NuComm, 		Dae Young, Raytheon TI, Wytek, I. O. Wave, VIS Technolgia, 		Multimedia Broadband Technologies, Triton Network Systems, 		Radyne and Texas Instruments

***SiCOM, Inc.***
***Scottsdale, AZ***

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**

**GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
-   Baseline modem for the NASA LeRC Direct Data 		Distribution (D3) project
-   Applicable to International Space Station and Earth 		Science missions which require wideband data 			service
-   BitFLOW will be used at Sandia Labs.  Other 			government agencies expressing interest include 		DARPA, NRO, DISA, USSPACECOM, and CECOM

- Lewis Research Center
- Satellite Communications
- 3-007

**INNOVATIVE HIGH SPEED MODEM FOR**
**SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS**

**INNOVATION**

- 1994 Phase II, NAS3-27824, 3/98
- NASA Contact - Monty Andro
- Company Contact - Bob Putnam

- Very high integration of modem functions and flexible user programmability enabled by unique algorithm development and hardware implementation

- SiCOM’s *BitFLOW* Variable Rate Programmable Demodulator
- Unit and the core ASIC
# Presentation: 139314

##            									E-COMPETENCIES						GODORT RESOURCES            			Amy West and Sherry DeDecker 

##            GODORT Created Resources            http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/GODORT/created.html 

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## 	GODORT Created Resources: 			How You Can Help	Submit recommendations to:   Amy West:  westx045@tc.umn.edu   Megan Dreger:mdreger@mail.sdsu.edu 		Co-Chairs, GITCO  Cass Hartnett: cass@u.washington.edu    Coordinator, Federal Documents Task Force
# Presentation: 022613

##   Accelerator Performance monitoring  tools meeting

- Vaia Papadimitriou
- September 28, 2006

- Review existing monitoring tools of accelerator performance
-  See how we can improve them and expand them
-  Any additional tools/diagnostics/alarms we need?
-  What are you relying upon?
- This is a broad area; we will simply see what is to be done, prioritaze, and then have follow up smaller meetings to focus more and understand the issues better and report on progress.
- We will try to focus on the machine departments today and mostly SDA type issues. Plan is to discuss more with Crew Chiefs in a follow up meeting operations issues in more detail.
- (power supply ramping at wrong time.. Any additional diagn.?)

##   SDA type tools

-  Supertable: _[http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDAMisc/new_supertableII.html](http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDAMisc/new_supertableII.html)_
-   Intensities/Efficiencies and Emittances Summary tables for the store that go into the ShotScrapbook
-  _[http://www-bdnew.fnal.gov/pbar/AEMPlots/today/DataSummaryTables.html](http://www-bdnew.fnal.gov/pbar/AEMPlots/today/DataSummaryTables.html)_ (Paul’s daily plots based on Supertable; add more plots here?)
-  Intensities SVG plots
-  Supertable Views, SDA Views (please ask if you want more)
-  ACC to RR pbar Transfer History Table:
- _[http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDA_Viewer/acc2rec_fast.jsp?last=50](http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDA_Viewer/acc2rec_fast.jsp?last=50)_
-  Intensities/Efficiencies and Emittance Tables for the shot that go into the Recycler Shot Scrapbook

## ACC to RR transfer history Table

##   SDA type tools

-  Integrated luminosity tables (default/alternate)
- http://www-bd.fnal.gov/javaapplications/html_write/tables/IntegratedLuminosity.html
-  http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDA_Viewer/alt_lum_catalog.jsp
-  Luminosity Decay fits: http://mccrory.fnal.gov/tevatronDecayFits/
-  OACs (Tevatron Emittance)
-  Bunch by bunch intensities/emittances (Derived Tables)
- http://www-bd.fnal.gov/OSDA/TableMaker.jsp (wrong lattice now)
- http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDA_Viewer/bunch_by_bunch_emittances_catalog.jsp
- Jerry’s tables
-  Linac, Booster (turns, bunches, intensity [ B:CHGB15, G:BNCH15] – separate monitoring
-  S. Valishev Store analysis tables
- http://www-bd.fnal.gov/SDAViewersServlets/valishev_sa_catalog.jsp

##   Additional thoughts?

-  Monitor pbars transfer by transfer?
-  Monitor proton bunches one by one?
-  Tevatron Phase meter?
-  Alarms for any machines down?
# Presentation: 752796

## D0 Status Summary

- Have been in supervised access all week, until Sunday evening
- Intermittent trips (low airflow) of west platform rack
- One of the magnetic sensors that measure the rate of rotation of the fan wasn't working properly – replaced
- Erected scaffolding on Monday for muon chamber (PDT) electronics replacement under the ceiling – repairs completed
- Power supply repairs for FPD in tunnel – done
- Minor safety improvements (additional step, more exit signs, ...)
- Cosmic ray running Friday evening
- Make sure all systems are fine
- Experiment is in good shape
- Comprehensive reviews of post-shutdown data quality ongoing

## D0 Status: Calorimeter

- E.g. Calorimeter
- Good qualitative and quantitative agreement pre- vs. post-shutdown
- See improvements from effort on noise and grounding, for example (online) RMS of MET improved from 5.3 GeV to 4.4 GeV

## CTT Status

- TTK terms comparable to
- pre-shutdown
- Little change in TTK rates
- due to CFT “dead channels”
- Slight increase in THT rates
- seen from setting discriminator
- outputs of VLPC unbiased
- channels to 1
- (Also descrease in rates due to
- modified threshold definitions)

- 2 tracks pT > 1.5GeV

- 2 tracks pT > 3GeV

- Occ. > 10%

## “Blue Node” Problem
# Presentation: 704635

## GPRA:  New Climate Observations Introduced

-      FY2005 Target: 1014 new ocean observing platforms deployed and reporting;
-      March 2005:  302 total ocean observing platforms (relative to total FY04 deployments); 230 ARGO floats

- Mar. 05

**B**

## GPRA:  Reduce the Error in Global Measurements of Sea Surface Temperature

-      FY05 target: 0.5 °C; Long-term Target: Error of 0.2 °C by 2008
-      Long-term measure:  annual targets, progress reported quarterly

- More rapid expansion of the in situ network over the next several years will minimize the satellite bias error, enabling more accurate global sea surface temperature from a combination of satellite and in situ measurements.

- Note: this measure is proposed as a new GPRA for FY2006; it is already reported on quarterly

- Satellite bias error: the systematic difference between satellite-derived vs. in situ measurements of sea surface temperature

- Mar. 05

**B**
# Presentation: 782453

## This Weekend – Extraction to MiniBooNE

- 10/31 (today):
- Evening:
- Secure MI and MiniBooNE line
- Test 860 switch magnet.
- 11/1:
- 0001-0600: All hands for extraction test
- Booster: Lackey, Prebys
- MI-8: Capista
- MiniBooNE: Kobilarcik
- Instrumentation: Crisp (on call).
- 0601-0900: Recycler Bake Inspection
- 0900-1300: Ming-Jen Optics studies
- Possible contingencies:
- Big problems: Get people in to work on Saturday.  Whole schedule shifts one day.
- Little problems: Schedule more tuning time as needed.

## On to Important Matters...

- Proton Source End of Shutdown Party!!!
- When:  Next Friday, 2:00PM
- Where: New MUCOOL Building
- What: Pizza, Snacks, Drinks
- Why:  Thanks to all the people within and outside the department who worked hard to make the shutdown happen.
- Who:  Everybody in the Department plus people outside the department who helped us significantly.

## Next Week

- Monday:
- Access Booster for miscellaneous repair work
- 480V work in Linac gallery. Power out to offices 7-11.  Turn off your computers!!!
- Beyond that?
# Presentation: 934034

## Slide 1

## First Pass Yield

## YIELD STATUS

- PY3 experienced a 70% FPY
- PY4 cannot tolerate a 70% FPY
- GOAL: Raise FPY to 90% in PY4

**NCM Procedure Applied **

## Combined FAT & SP Failure Categories

## Action Plan #1

- Flasher Board STF Failures (18% of Fails):
- The largest NCM contributor
- Root Cause(s):
- Main Board Clock Driver behavior
- Other potential causes under investigation
- Corrective Action:
- Revised HAL software/Flasher Bd. CPLD firmware
- LBNL investigating MB Clock-possible new part.
- “low risk” changes for this year
- Prognosis for PY4:
- Significant reduction in occurrence.
- Watch in Mini-Fat.

**NCM Procedure Applied **

## Action Plan #2

- Low PMT Gain Failures (14 % of Fails):
- Second largest NCM contributor
- Root Cause(s):
- Software Glitch in testing
- Same Gains specs applied to both Ice Top & In-Ice PMTs. (10% PMTs right at Gain Margin)
- Corrective Action:
- Instituted Software changes for FAT3
- For PY4, Incoming Insp screen to sort lower end gains for Ice Top/ higher end gains for in-ice.
- Prognosis for PY4:
- Elimination of Low PMT Gain failures

**NCM Procedure Applied **

## Action Plan #3

- Reboot Failures (14 % of Fails):
- Third largest NCM contributor
- Root Cause(s):
- Initial CPLD programming not robust
- Other Root Cause(s) under investigation
- Corrective Action:
- Reprogrammed CPLDs/ Retested DOMs. Works for most.
- 3 “4-29 Rev. CPLD” failures in FAT 3/ Re-run in FAT 4.
- Further investigation continues.
- Prognosis for PY4:
- No new reboot failures in PSL FAT 4, DESY FATs 2, 3. Looks good for this year.

**NCM Procedure Applied **

## Action Plan #4

- OTHER: 12% of Failures
- Fourth largest NCM contributor
- 7 = DC Corning Gel
- 2 = Incorrect DB Entries
- 2 = Monitor DAQ
- 2 = REDO DOMCAL
- 1 = Many STF Fails
- 1 = Chipped Sphere
- 1 = Broken Penetrator Connector
- 1 = Pressure Leak
- Prognosis for PY4:
- No more DC Gel
- Break out “Other Category”

**NCM Procedure Applied **

## Going Forward

- We appear to have solved the “Big” reasons for Fallout (80%)
- However: Increased production
- New, Faster Evaluation Methods
- Keep Production Going and return vital analytical info to Project
- Supplier Communication: Vital
- Open up NCM process to ALL!
# Presentation: 312817

## Prineville District

- Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands in OregonEnvironmental Impact Statement

## Prineville District - Common Weed Species

- Whitetop

- Dalmatian toadflax

- Medusahead rye

## Russian knapweed

- Diffuse knapweed

- Yellow starthistle

## Leafy spurge

- Puncture vine

- Canada thistle

## Example of Weed Treatment Map

## Integrated Vegetation Management

- Provide public information on washing vehicles to avoid transporting undesirable plant seeds onto public lands; sign boards; handouts at recreation sites
- Coordinate with 8 county weed boards and provide funding to 5 counties for weed control on BLM lands
- Using biological control agents in coordination with Oregon Dept of Agriculture

## Integrated Vegetation Management

- Use a variety of approved chemicals for targeted species
- Treatment priorities include high use recreation areas; acquired lands (abandoned agricultural fields); areas with high concentrations of noxious weeds; riparian areas; areas of whitetop
- Before treatments occur we contact adjacent landowners and neighbors.  Many treatments are a result of landowners calling us

## Manual & Mechanical Treatments

- Approximately 550 acres treated annually
- 1350 acres are monitored for treatment effectiveness
- Treatments are generally limited to areas with good access – high use recreation areas and along roads
- Treatments in the river canyons are desirable but difficult and costly due to limited access

## Biological Agents

- Establishment of food and cover crops to out compete weeds
- Introduction of toadflax capsule weevil to control Dalmatian toadflax in the John Day River corridor

## Herbicide Treatments

- Acquired lands (abandoned agricultural fields) use chemicals for treating knapweeds and broadleaf weeds (county and BLM)

## Pesticide Use Permit Application

- Location of the area to be treated
- Chemical to be applied, application rate and method of application
- Target species
- Description of treatment site
- Sensitive aspects and precautions/mitigations
- Impacts to non-target species

## How Vegetation Treatment EIS Would Help

- Target-specific herbicides are more effective at treating the problem
- Safer to use in sensitive riparian habitats
- Reduced residual off-site effects
- More cost effective

## District Level Analysis

- Once the statewide Vegetation Treatment EIS is finalized, additional National Environmental Policy Act analysis would be required at the District or Resource Area level.
# Presentation: 866160

## WR Presentation4th Ensemble Users Workshop

- May 13, 2008
- Dave Myrick, Ken Pomeroy & Andy Edman

## WR PoP Verification

- Fall 2007 – WR WFO’s installed BOIVerify version 2.0
- PoP/QPF verification
- Can store & verify against different analyses
- WFO’s began verifying their PoP/QPF forecasts to RFC QPE fields (NPVU)
- Interesting results when we investigated SREF PoP guidance

## SREF PoP Verification

- WFO’s calculated SREF PoP reliability for a 30 day period during Dec/Jan
- Calculated regional stats
- SREF PoP is not really a PoP grid, but rather the percentage of members forecasting precip
- Overforecasts PoP
- Can be useful, but not if directly interpreted as a PoP

## WR SREF Summary

## A 45-h SREF 70% PoP Verifies...

| BOI | 39 | OTX | 35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EKA | 38 | PDT | 40 |
| FGZ | 23 | PSR | 20 |
| HNX | 50 | REV | 53 |
| LKN | 25 | SEW | 45 |
| LOX | 75 | SGX | 47 |
| MFR | 34 | SLC | 33 |
| MSO | 33 | TWC | 62 |
| MTR | 78 | VEF | 40 |

- ...X Percent of the Time

## SREF PoP Takeaways

- Ensembles are not dispersive enough
- 100% PoPs calibrate to a 70%-80% verification
- Provides a consistent signal over the different forecast periods (useful info for forecasters)
- BOIVerify provides a way of assessing local biases of the SREF in order to make local adjustments

## WR Dry Bias

## Eureka

**QPF and POP Verification **

**Success: In long range POP is starting near Climo **

**Future consideration: For high impact events with good agreement of ensembles/models.  Should initial POP be wetter than climo?**

**Eureka**

- PoP bias for 2 Events (Nov. 30 and Dec. 08) – Old Methodology

- Dry bias develops quickly with -20 bias by 48 hours and exceeding -40 at forecast hour 168

**Las Vegas**

- PoP bias for 3 events – CWA – New Methodology

**Las Vegas**

**Notes:**
Only looking at three rain events for the CWA the numbers change.
The Official forecast had a slight low PoP bias out to 84 hours where it gradually increased, as expected out to 30% by Day 8.
The ECMWF provides best performance throughout, with the GFS and Official forecasts equalling the ECMWF through ~72 hours.
The ADJ sources all underperformed the models and the Official forecast.

## Summary

- SREF exhibits a “wet” bias in the West
- Starting to take “baby-steps” to look at PoP/QPF (PoP conveys probability and uncertainty in fcst)
- Local studies have shown WR has a “dry” PoP bias
- Need a verification system to validate probabilities and help forecasters understand how to use data
- Calibration needed because forecasters have their own internal biases and will drift

## WR/SSD PoP/QPF Verification Page http://165.92.200.49:8080   (on AWIPS network)

- WR/SSD PoP/QPF Verification Page http://165.92.200.49:8080   (on AWIPS network)
# Presentation: 747554

## Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office 

- Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office** **
**Program Snapshot for FY 2004**
*Federal Environmental Cleanups that Put Citizens First*

**National Priorities List (NPL) Information Summary**

***Status of NPL Federal Facilities***

_**Notes:**_**  ****	****All data from 10/15/2004 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL and Non-NPL cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facilities.  **

***NPL Federal Facilities by Agency***

**Other Federal Agencies include: Coast Guard (1),**** D****OI (2), DOT (1), EPA (1),**** ****FAA (1), NASA (2), SBA (1), USDA (2)*

**Total number of Federal Facilities and  private sites on the NPL is 1,597.*

**21**

**42**

**3**

**54**

**1**

**45**

**1**

**11**

***Percent of NPL Facilities with Completed ***
***IAGs/FFAs by Agency***
***(Facilities with IAG/Total Facilities)***

***Federal Facility Cleanup Pipeline***

- 19 / 21

- 0 / 1

- 0 / 1

- 0 / 1

- 44 / 54

- 30 / 42

- 1 / 2

- 40 / 45

- The following Federal Agencies have achieved 100% of their IAGs/FFAs: DLA, NASA, DOI, Natl Guard, CoE, EPA and FAA.

## Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office 

**Program Snapshot for FY 2004**

**Community Involvement**

***Technical Assistance Grants (TAGs) and ***
***Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs)/***
***Site-Specific Advisory Boards****** ******(SSABs) ***

_**Notes:**_** ****	****All data from 10/15/2004 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL and Non-NPL cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facilities.  **

**Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)**

***BRAC Parcels where ***
***Finding of Suitability to Transfer/Lease is Completed***
- Cumulative Acreage (in Thousands)

*Number of Acres*

- (Total: 184)

**8**

**83**

** ****33**

**36**

_**Groundwater**_

_**Human Exposure**_

**49**

**32**

**4**

**37**

**4**

**38**

**11**

**75**

- Note:  There are 129 NPL Federal Facilities with Institutional Controls.

***Post-Construction Completion ***
***Activity at NPL Facilities***

**Long Term Stewardship/Post Construction Completion**

***Long Term Stewardship***
***at NPL Facilities***

***NPL Federal Facility Remedial Pipelines and Removal Actions***

**Institutional Controls at NPL Facilities**

***RCRA High Priority Facilities***
***Total Facilities: 160***
*Source: RCRIS 6/8/2004*

**Environmental Indicators at Federal Facilities**

***EI Status for NPL Federal Facilities (CERCLA)***
***Total Facilities: 174***
# Presentation: 064605

## North America Drought MonitorWhere Have We BeenWhere Are We Going

**USDM Workshop**
**Washington, D.C., October 2005**

## Previous Milestones

**April 2002**
- Initiation of NADM discussed at USDM Workshop
**December 2002**
- First experimental North America Drought Monitor Map completed and placed online
**April 2003**
- First experimental NADM map released to public
**November 2003**
- Addition of French and Spanish translations of Map
**May 2004**
- Canadian analysis expanded beyond Agricultural Prairies
**June 2005**
- Removal of experimental label from US and Mexico portion of NADM map and initiation of New Timeline

## New TimelineImplemented in June 2005

- Indices calculated by NCDC and placed online by 7th
- Canada merges USDM weekly shapefiles with Canadian first-guess shapefiles by 8th and sends to primary author
- Miguel prepares Mexico drought depiction in .jpg format by 8th and e-mails to primary author who creates NADM depiction for Mexico
- Text discussion sent from Mexico and Canada by 14th
- Peer-review of NADM map until finalized and placed online by 16th

## For the Future

- Short-term
- Add Canada to primary author rotation (Feb 06)
- Transition US from divisional to station data
- Increase number of stations reporting from Canada
- ??
- Mid-term
- Provide updated indicator maps on a weekly basis
- Data Issues (Formats, Ingest/Processing, Automation)
- Make Canadian depiction fully operational
- Add Mexico to primary author rotation
- ??
- Long-term
- Improve Timeliness of monthly product
- Transition to a weekly product
# Presentation: 918968

## The President’s Cancer Panel2004/2005 SeriesTranslating Research to Reduce the Burden of Cancer

- Margaret L. Kripke, Ph.D.
- January 25, 2005

## The President’s Cancer Panel

- National Cancer Act of 1971
- Oversees the National Cancer Program
- Three Members
- Meet Four Times per Year
- Reports to the President of the United States

## Translating Research to Reduce the Burden of Cancer

- August 30, 2004–University of California at San Francisco
- September 27, 2004–The Ohio State University
- November 1, 2004–M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- January 24, 2005–Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

## Laboratory              Clinic           Community

## Laboratory to Clinic–Barriers	

- Research culture
- Infrastructure
- Funding sources
- Conflict of interest
- Complexity of clinical trials

## Research Culture

- Differing cultures of physicians and scientists
- Lack of incentives for team science
- Creation of knowledge vs. application
- Departmental structure

## Infrastructure

- Access to human samples
- Interactive databases
- Conflict of interest
- Clinical trials support

## Funding Sources

- Need for “gap” funding
- Demands on clinicians’ time
- Need for partnerships

## Conflict of Interest/Intellectual Property

- No universal standards
- Commercialization
- Public trust

## Complexity of Clinical Trials

- IRB issues
- Informed consent
- Changing regulations
- HIPAA
- Trial design

## Clinic to Community–Barriers

- Public trust
- Communication
- Community involvement
- Cost

## Where Do We Go From Here?

- Develop recommendations
- Deliver Report to President
- 2005/2006 Series–Focus Groups on Recommendations
# Presentation: 524097

## Slide 1

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

## Slide 28

## Slide 29

## Slide 30

## Slide 31

## Slide 32

## Slide 33

## Slide 34

## Slide 35

## Slide 36

## Slide 37

## Slide 38

## Slide 39

## Slide 40

## Slide 41

## Slide 42

## Slide 43

## Slide 44

## Slide 45

## Slide 46

## Slide 47

## Slide 48

## Slide 49

## Slide 50

## Slide 51

## Slide 52