# Presentation: 667703

## E911 PHASE 2 ACCURACY DEFINITION MODIFICATION PROPOSAL MEAN RADIAL ERROR (MRE)

**Mark Birchler, Manager**
**Wireless Access Technology Research**
**Motorola Labs**
**birchler@rsch.comm.mot.com**

## Accuracy Proposals

**RMS**
**Root Mean Square of all location attempt errors**
**Current FCC sanctioned accuracy definition**
**Assessment:**
**Gives undue weight to outliers**
**Includes all location attempts in accuracy calculation**
**67%**
**Abscissa value at which the location error CDF crosses the 67% level**
**Assessment:**
**Very insensitive to outliers**
**Magnitude of largest 33% errors not counted in accuracy calculation**
**90% RMS**
**Root Mean Square of location attempt errors with largest 10% excluded**
**Assessment:**
**Insensitive to outliers**
**Magnitude of largest 10% errors not counted in accuracy calculation**
**New proposal: MRE (Mean Radial Error)**

## Proposal development criteria
all location attempts should be counted as part of the accuracy definition
a small fraction of location failures or “outliers” should not unduly skew the results of an otherwise excellent ALI technology
the original accuracy goals of the Commission should not be relaxed
MRE proposal
Calculate accuracy as the Mean of the Radial Error
Comparison: RMS and MRE
RMS error equation (assumes actual location at origin)

MRE error equation (same assumption)

Errors accumulated by magnitude for MRE and magnitude squared for RMS
MRE includes all errors, but does not unduly magnify “outliers”
MRE provides for more equitable error weighting

**all location attempts should be counted as part of the accuracy definition**
**a small fraction of location failures or “outliers” should not unduly skew the results of an otherwise excellent ALI technology**
**the original accuracy goals of the Commission should not be relaxed**
**MRE proposal**
**Calculate accuracy as the **_**M**_**ean of the **_**R**_**adial **_**E**_**rror**
**Comparison: RMS and MRE**
**RMS**** error equation (assumes actual location at origin)**
**MRE**** error equation (same assumption)**
**Errors accumulated by magnitude for MRE and magnitude squared for RMS**
**MRE includes all errors, but does not unduly magnify “outliers”**
**MRE provides for more equitable error weighting**

_**Mean Radial Error (MRE) Proposal**_

***Errors accumulated as ***
***magnitude squared***

***Errors accumulated as ***
***magnitude***

## ACCURACY EQUIVALENCE

**Probability theory**
**Gaussian probability density function (PDF)**
**Transform this density by the function:**
**Resulting random variable has a Rayleigh PDF**
**The mean of this transformed Gaussian process is well known to be:**
**Accuracy equivalence**
**A****RMS**** = 125 m for ******** = 88.39 m**
**For ******** = 88.39 m, A****MRE**** = 110 m**
**Thus, setting a 110 meter MRE accuracy goal is equivalent to an RMS goal of 125 meters**
**MRE accuracy goal of 110 meters is equivalent to 125 meter RMS goal**

## ACCURACY DEFINITION CASE STUDIES

**Case 1**
** ****1000 2-D Gaussian draws**
** ******** ****= 50 m (both dimensions)**
** ****Radial error ******** = 71 m**

**Case 2**
** ****980 points identical to Case 1**
**20 “outliers” created**
**offset points by 1000 m**
**2% outlier probability**

## ACCURACY RESULTS

_**ACCURACY RESULTS**_

** ****Accuracy impact of 2% outlier as compared to Gaussian case**
** ****RMS accuracy degraded by 120%, non-compliant**
** ****RME accuracy degraded by 30%, compliant**
** ****67% and RMS90% accuracies degraded by less than 2%, compliant **

**Accuracy (m)**

**125 meters**

**110 meters**

## CONCLUSIONS

**The MRE definition: **
**Assures that all errors are counted in the accuracy calculation**
**Reduces sensitivity to outliers**
**Assures equivalent accuracy to the 125m/RMS goal (Gaussian assumption)**
**By setting MRE accuracy goal to 110 meters**
**Win/Win for the interested parties**
**Public safety assured that all location errors counted in accuracy calculation**
**Carriers and vendors assured relief from excessive outlier impact on accuracy calculation**
**We now have at least four accuracy definition proposals**
**RMS**
**67%**
**90% RMS**
**MRE**
**Which one represents the best compromise between public safety requirements and wireless industry compliance difficulty?**
**Let’s work together to expeditiously decide**