BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 391218

## Weather Briefing

- June 23 10:00 CDT

## Verification

- Yesterday’s Forecast

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Observations

## Link to Satellite Loop

- _[http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satellite/displaySat.php?region=US&isingle=multiple&itype=](http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satellite/displaySat.php?region=US&isingle=multiple&itype=ir)__[ir](http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satellite/displaySat.php?region=US&isingle=multiple&itype=ir)_

## Slide 7

- _[http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/Conus/southplains_loop.](http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/Conus/southplains_loop.php)__[php](http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/Conus/southplains_loop.php)_

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## METARs 

**METARs**
- (9 am CDT)
**PNC**: **Ceiling:** at least 12,000 feet AGL
**Clouds:** scattered clouds at 1300 feet AGL
**OKC**: **Ceiling:** 25000 feet AGL
**Clouds:** scattered clouds at 800 feet AGLbroken clouds at 25000 feet AGL
**END**: **Ceiling:** at least 12,000 feet AGL
**Clouds:** sky clear below 12,000 feet AGL

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Forecasts

## Slide 19

## Slide 20

## Slide 21

## Slide 22

## Slide 23

## Slide 24

## Slide 26

## Slide 27

- _[http://science.arm.gov/clasic/forecasts.](http://science.arm.gov/clasic/forecasts.php)__[php](http://science.arm.gov/clasic/forecasts.php)_

- _[http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/wrf/sdg/](http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/wrf/sdg/)_

## Slide 30

## Extended Outlook

## Slide 32

## Slide 33

## Slide 34

## Slide 35

## Slide 36

## Slide 37

## Slide 38
# Presentation: 352926

## Putting the EAP in TEAP

- Pat Jackson, RN
- National Health Consultant
- Atlanta Region Health and Wellness Conference
- September 21, 2006

## Employee Assistance Program

- Definition:  Work-Live Services that help manage the demands of work, home and life that impact on an employee’s productivity.
- Ultimately, an EAP is an employer  productivity program as well as an employee benefit.

## Employee Assistance Program (continued)

- Employee Assistance Programs focus on education, intervention and prevention.
- Materials and educational awareness programs
- Evaluations
- Assessments
- Short term problem resolution
- Staff training and consultations

## Employee Assistance Program (continued)

- The most valuable services provided by an EAP is a counseling and referral system.
- A counselor **listens** to concerns, helps to identify the source of the problem and assists to find practical solutions

## Employee Assistance and Job Corps

- How can Job Corps expand the roll of the TEAP specialist to include a full range of Employee Assistance Services?

## Life Planning

- Develop strategies to deal with turning points in life.
- Job Corps arrival
- Living with a roommate
- Choosing a career
- Home visits
- Transition to work

## Promoting Wellness

- Maintaining and creating healthy lifestyles
- Alcohol and drug information and intervention
- The importance of exercise and recreation
- Manage anger

## Work-Life Services

- Child care issues
- Family illness support
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Substance abuse
- Consumer information
- Obtaining health care

## Work-Life Services (continued)

- Budgeting/finances
- Mental health services
- Parenting
- Domestic violence
- Abuse issues

## Employee Assistance Work Session

- At each table you will find a document that lists categories of employee assistance services.  Take 10 minutes to add to the service list, discuss how each service can be provided at Job Corps and which staff member can be used as the referral source.

## TEAP 

- A PROGRAM
- NOT
- A PERSON
# Presentation: 190592

## February 2000

**February 2000**

**POR-97-7075 V 3.2**
**Updated Baseline Issue**

- Prepared for:

- Maryland
- Department of Transportation

## Please note that this is an Updated Baseline Issue

**Please note that this is an Updated Baseline Issue**
- The State of Maryland is serving as a CVISN Prototype State.  Part of the responsibility involved in this position is to provide example documentation and lessons learned to the CVISN Pilot States and other states developing their CVISN programs.
- Earlier versions of this plan were published and distributed at CVISN workshops for states to copy or use as an example.  This version represents significant updates to those earlier versions. The plan has been updated to reflect Maryland’s current objectives for CVISN.  This plan is a baseline version that still requires final approval by the State of Maryland and its contractors.  It will be placed under configuration control once approval is obtained.
- Maryland has tailored its program planning process, as expected for all states.  This plan is therefore an example of *applying* the recommended planning process; it is not a perfect example.  However, the plan is a realistic example of what can be done with limited resources, i.e., preparing a sufficiently complete and correct plan versus developing a plan perfect in all detail.
- Certain items in this plan (e.g., processes and procurement) were not completed following the current format and content guidelines in the CVISN Guide to Program and Project Planning or the CVISN Planning Workshop.  It was not viewed as an efficient use of resources to fill in current templates and forms retroactively.
# Presentation: 721678

## SANS Study of Polyethylene Crystallization from Solution

- Howard Wang, Michigan Technological University, DMR-0348895

-  Crystallization of polyethylene from concentrated solutions has been studied using small angle neutron scattering (SANS).
- The detection sensitivity of the volume fraction degree of crystallinity is estimated to be 10-5, which allows for the measurement of the very early stages of crystal growth.
- There is no evidence of diverging or spinodal-decomposition-like density fluctuations during the early stage of crystallization in polyethylene solutions.
- The importance of background subtraction has been suggested in evaluating the small angle x-ray
-   	scattering data.

- (A) SANS spectra of the* ***0 = 0.24 PE solution after cooling from 120.0 oC to various temperatures.    The low temperature (85.0, 90.0 and 95.0 oC) spectra show both the characteristic form and structure factors of stacked lamellae.  (B) Illustration of excess signals and simulated spectra for a typical small angle x-ray scattering experiment.

- (A)

- (B)

**Publications:**
- 1. Wang, H., et al., ***Appl. Phys. Lett.****,* **88**, 213111 (2006).
- 2. Wang, H., ***Polymer,***** 47**, 4897 (2006).
- 3. Wang, H., book chapter in “Lecture Notes in Physics: Polymer Crystallization”, Reiter, G. and Strobl, G., Ed. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
- 4. Wang, H., et al., ***Chem. Phys. Lett. *****416**, 182 (2005)

- Time-resolved ultra-SANS has also been used to study the early stage kinetics of the lamellar lateral growth.

## SANS Study of Polyethylene Crystallization from Solution

-  The PI has introduced polymer and nanotechnology components to several outreach programs at the Michigan Tech, including the Women in Engineering, Exploration in Engineering and Summer Youth Programs, in which many participants are woman and minority high school students from local Indian reservation and Detroit urban areas.

**Education at Graduate and Undergraduate Levels:**
-  Two Ph.D. students: Kaikun Yang (3nd yr), Yayong Liu (2nd yr)
-  One post-doctoral fellow: Dr. Narayan Ch Das
-  One Materials Science & Engineering undergraduate student: Kevin Baker
-  Developed courses “Introduction to Polymer Engineering”, “Soft Materials”, and “Bioapplications of Nanotechnology

-  The participants in Woman in Engineering and Exploration in Engineering make PDMS elastic balls and test the mechanical properties; they also make fiber reinforced composite boats and test sail on the Portage lake.

***SANS Study of Polyethylene Crystallization from Solution***
- Howard Wang, Michigan Technological University, DMR-0348895
# Presentation: 041575

## Physics 2010 Decadal Survey

- Comments before Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee
- 16 July 2007

**T.I. Meyer, BPA**

## The National Academies

- The National Academies is the umbrella “brand” for the National Research Council (NRC), National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine
- NAS is the part originally chartered by Abraham Lincoln in 1863
- One function of NRC is to “survey” fields of science and engineering
- Snapshot of recent progress
- Assessment of emerging research directions
- Recommendations (to govm’t, scientific community, and society) for strategies to realize most ripe and compelling opportunities
- NRC’s Board on Physics and Astronomy conducts a survey of physics, subfield by subfield, every ~10 years (takes about 10 years!)
*Physics in a New Era *wrapped up in 2001.  The new exercise is called *Physics 2010.*
- This new cycle reflects some key changes in the approach
- Less inward-looking; involve “neighbors” and “outsiders”
- Avoid an exhaustive catalog; identify clear priorities

## Physics 2010

- Elementary Particle Physics 2010
- Report released in late April 2006
- Radical approach resulted in unusually strong report
- Atomic, Molecular, Optical Physics 2010
- Report released in July 2006
- Framed the science in compelling, simple questions
- Condensed-Matter and Materials Physics 2010
- Report released in June 2007
- Framed the future of the science, made strong linkages to other fields
- Plasma Science 2010
- Report released in May 2007
- Highlights broad impact and intellectual unity...
# Presentation: 197211

## Performing TRaP For Allison

**Performing TRaP For Allison**

- AMSU-B Rain Rates -  Input

- TRaP  - Output

**0830 UTC    Jun 5  2001**

**24 hours ending       Jun 6  2001**

**12.5” max**

## TRaP Compared With Observed

**12UTC Jun 5 to 12UTC Jun 6 2001**

- TRaP For Allison

**12UTC Jun 5 to 12UTC Jun 6 2001**

- Observed For Allison

**12”max**

**12.5” max**

## TRaP Calculations

**12UTC Jun 5 to 12UTC Jun 6 2001**

**24 h  ending 12 UTC Jun 6 2001**

**24 h ending 12 UTC Jun 6 2001**

**12” max**

**TRaP Calculations**

**ETA Model Forecast**

**Stage III multi-sensor observations**

***Tropical Storm Allison***

**3”**

**12.5” max**

## Performing TRaP For Barry

-   Input

- Output  -  SSM/I  TRaP

**9.5” max**

**1536 UTC August 5 2001**

**DMSP SSMI Rain Rates**

**NCEP TPC           Storm Track Forecast**

- 18 UTC Aug 5

- 06 UTC Aug 6

- 18 UTC Aug 6

**1536 utc Aug 5 2001**

**Notes:**
The input for Tropical Rainfall Potential (TRaP) is the microwave rain rate image (top left-hand figure) and the most current official NCEP Tropical Prediction Center (TPC) Storm Track Forecast (lower left-hand figure).  These two inputs allowed the Satellite Services Division workstation computer to produce a 24 hour areal graphic of rainfall potential (the TRaP forecast guidance product) in the right-hand figure.  This information, before Tropical Storm Barry made landfall, was provided to the various National Weather Service agencies to help in their forecast of both location and amount of rainfall from this storm.

## TRaP Compared With Observed  For Tropical Storm Barry

**24hr Observed Rainfall**

**TRaP Rainfall Forecast**

**9.5”max**

**9.0”+ max**

**18 utc Aug 5 to 18 utc Aug 6 2001 **

**18 utc Aug 5 to 18 utc Aug 6 2001**

**Notes:**
This is a comparison between a 24-hour TRaP guidance forecast (left-hand figure) and the 24 hour observed rainfall (right-hand figure) for the period 1800 UTC August 5 to 
1800 UTC August 6, 2001.   Notice that the TRaP forecast maximum rainfall is very close to both the location and amount of the observed rainfall. 

## Comparing TRaP, Model and Observed  For Tropical Storm Barry

**9.5”max**

**9.0”+ max**

**18 utc Aug 5 to 18 utc Aug 6 2001 **

**SSMI TRaP**

**ETA K-F Model**

**Observed Rainfall**

**4.0” max**

**Notes:**
This is a comparison between a 24-hour TRaP guidance forecast (top left-hand figure) and the 24-hour computer rainfall forecast from the ETA K-F high resolution computer forecast model (lower left-hand figure) and the observed rainfall (right-hand figure) for the period 1800 UTC August 5 to 1800 UTC August 6, 2001 for Tropical Storm Barry.   Notice that the TRaP forecast maximum rainfall (top left-hand figure) is very close to the high resolution computer model’s forecast (lower left-hand figure).  However, the TRaP forecast rainfall amount of 9.5” is far superior to the computer’s forecast of near 4.0” when comparing them with the observed 24-hour rainfall of 9.0”+ from Barry in the right-hand figure.
# Presentation: 262528

## Exploring your geospatial data

## It’s all about Relationships!

**It’s all about Relationships!**

## Download the SSURGO Template for your MMA 

## Two Important Points! 

- This is Not DIFFICULT!
- The technology is not NEW!
- 		What is new is our
- 		ability to look at these
- 		enormous databases
- 		in totally new ways.

## Identifying slope inconsistencies in terrace soils 

- Construct a Make Table query in Access using the cogeomordesc, component, and mapunit tables

- Make MUKEY the first column in the output table

## Output Access table

- In ArcMap, join to the SSURGO attribute table using the MUKEY field

## Select for all polygons that are terraces

- Export the polygons to a feature class called terrace_soils

## Slide 8

## Open the SSURGO attribute table, and add a long integer field called objid

- Open the SSURGO attribute table, and add a long integer field called objid

- Double click on OBJECTID field to calculate objid = [OBJECTID]

## Choose Zonal Statistics from the Spatial Analyst dropdown

- The Zone dataset will be terrace_soils
- The Zone field will be objid
- The Value raster will be the slope grid
- Check the box to Join output table to zone layer
- Save the output table if you want
- Click OK

## Slide 11

## X the chart out

- Look the table over, then close or minimize it

## Using mukey for the Zone field aggregates statistics by the mukey

## Construct a SQL query to select polygons in which the representative slope value is more than 2 standard deviations greater or less than the mean slope within the polygon

## Scale   1:35,114

## So, you start with the cogeomordesc table here, see.

- Yeah! Then you relate it to the component table, using the cokey field!

- Then the mukey ties it all together!

## Series extent, distribution and overlap 

- Join the SSURGO template mapunit table to the SSURGO attribute table using the MUKEY field

## Select polygons LIKE ‘%Craig%’

- The % sign is Arc’s wild card to match any characters that come before or after the character string ‘Craig’

## Export the selected set to its own feature class

## Slide 20

## Tabulated areas are the number of 30 meter grid cells in each MMA. This table can be exported to .dbf, imported into Access or Excel, and acreages can be calculated.

## Slide 22

## Find SSURGO mapunits with lacustrine parent materials 

- Make MUKEY the first column in the output table

## Slide 24

## Slide 25

## New Age – New  Toys (Tools)

**New Age – New  Toys (Tools)**

- “You young pups with all your fancy play toys and whatnot....
- “Back when I was a pup, all we had to play with was an old cat’s head”

## Any questions? 

**Any questions?**

## Slide 28

## Use the help screens in Arc
Use relationships for all kinds of queries
Use all the tools available—Access, ArcGIS, ArcCatalog, Excel
Step away from the machine
Resources:
Access user guides at http://soils.usda.gov/technical/access/

- Use relationships for all kinds of queries
- Use all the tools available—Access, ArcGIS, ArcCatalog, Excel
- Step away from the machine
- Resources:
- Access user guides at http://soils.usda.gov/technical/access/

**Suggestions**
# Presentation: 106764

## The Cathode Strip Chamber System

**Small Wheel C being prepared**
**for Installation **

**Designed to handle the high rates  (1kHz/cm2) in  the forward ATLAS Muon  system**
**32 4-layer Chambers**
**31,000 Radiation Hard Readout**
**  ****Channels**
**Covers 27% of the Muon Coverage in **
** ****Pseudorapidity Space**
**Spatial Resolution of 60 microns**
**Transverse Coordinate to ~1 cm**

**CSC Detectors**

- for the ATLAS Forward Muon Spectrometer

- U.S. ATLAS Americas Physics Workshop

- October 2, 2007

## BNL Involvement and Plans

- BNL developed technology originally for E814 and then for GEM at the SSC
- Detectors at RHIC, CMS, LHCb also based on this concept
- BNL has had the primary responsibility for the ATLAS System
- Overall System Responsibility
- Designed, developed, constructed all Chambers
- Designed, constructed, tested, installed on-board Electronics
- Responsible for all Services installation/maintenance
- Other Institutions involved:
- UCI – Off-Chamber Electronics
- U. of Arizona – Calibration
- BNL physicists involved: V. Polychronakos, V. Tcherniatine
- Must maintain effort for the foreseeable future for  finishing installation and commissioning, maintenance, repairs, upgrades

- U.S. ATLAS Americas Physics Workshop

- October 2, 2007
# Presentation: 891774

## Accessing Computer Security Configuration Baseline Documents 

- September 27, 2006

## How-to Steps

- Must have a valid KCA certificate loaded in your web browser.
- Visit the Computing Division Document Database: _[http://cd-docdb.fnal.gov/](http://cd-docdb.fnal.gov/)_
- Click on “Access Certificate Version of CD DocDB”.
- One of two things will happen:
- You will see a form that allows you to enter various search parameters. Go to step 5.
- You will see a form that asks for your email and what groups you want to belong to. Ask for membership in the “KCA” Group. When you receive email notice that you are in the group, start again at step 2.

## How-to Steps (continued)

- Under the heading “List:” select “Keywords”.
- Under the heading “CSPP” select the keyword “CSPP_Rewrite”.
- A list of configuration baselines will be displayed.
- Click the title of a baseline.
- Under the heading “Files in Document:” click on the document with the desired format (generally .doc or .pdf are the only choices).

## Short Cut to Baselines

- Once you have established access to docdb as described above, baselines can be accessed:
- http://computing.fnal.gov/cd/CSPPdocs

## Document access parameters

- Read only access to all documents available to the KCA “Group”.
- Able to use all of the DocDB search features.
- Convenience of not needing  a username/password.

## Questions?
# Presentation: 943100

## Mike Douglas/NSSL:  To describe mesoscale structure of amplifying wave before over-ocean spin-up...Are waves already amplifying before crossing the coast?

*Mesoscale “module” to measure vorticity of the wave trough to quantify amplification and eye development...*
*AM flights to minimize flights into strong convective systems...*

*Measure relative intensity of waves in lower troposphere during Aug-Sept with network of pilot balloon stations ... 3 times daily soundings*
*Provides “context” for DC-8 flights...*

*Sequential dropsonde patterns 1-2 days apart*
# Presentation: 029912

## HPPNET: A Novel Network for HPC and Its Implication for CommunicationSoftware

**Panyong Zhang**, Can Ma, Jie Ma, Qiang Li,
- Dan Meng
- National Research Center for Intelligent Computing Systems, ICT,CAS.

## Support HPP Architecture Global Load/store
PGAS Language  fine-grained global access load/store support
“Communication Wall” Multi-Link, User-space RDMA
Short Message/Large Message Separated Channel Design

**Why HPPNET?**

- Support HPP Architecture Global Load/store
- PGAS Language  fine-grained global access load/store support
- “Communication Wall” Multi-Link, User-space RDMA
- Short Message/Large Message Separated Channel Design

## What is HPP architecture?

- Focus on peta-scale Challenge
- MPP + Cluster
- Global Address space
- RT+ Single-image OS +Management Software
- General Application
- Compatible with Cluster hardware, software

- HPPNET

## What HPPNET did?

- HyperNIC
*HT-enabled* Network Interface
- Different  Channel abstraction for different message sizes
- 16 ports HyperSwitch
- Hardware support Reliable Barrier, unreliable Multicast
- Multiple link
- 4 separate links, 2.5Gbps each 10Gbps
- Fine-grained Load/Store in global physical address space

## HyperNIC

*HyperTransport* interface to Processor
- HT2.0 Compatible
- No Embedded Processor
- Command window based
- User map the *Control Page* of HyperNIC to operate NIC.
- Different core use different channel, =>different control page
- Separate Channel Design
- NAP (non-address pointer) Channel
- MSG (Message) Channel
- Global Load/Store Module

## Separate Channel Design

- NAP Channel
- Latency Oriented
- Send/Recv Sematics
- Determined Routing

- MSG Channel
- Bandwidth Oriented
- RMA Semantics
- Adaptive Routing

- BCL-5 did the Port Abstraction

## Global Load/Store support

- OS page table do the address translation
*global_address_mmap()*
* **global_address_munmap()*
- Use 2M Super Page to reduce the Page table footprint

*......*
*ptr = (int *)global_addr_mmap(...);*
**ptr = 0x5a;*
*global_addr_munmap(ptr...);*
*......*

- Global Physical address spaces
- Non-cache coherent in global region
*HyperNIC* Trap the *HT* global load/store access instruction, issue network operation

## Summary

- HPPNET
- HyperNIC
- HT-enabled
- Separate Channel
- Global Load/store

## Acknowledgements

- Our Research is supported by the following organizations

## Questions?

- Contact with Panyong Zhang<zhangpanyong@ncic.ac.cn>
# Presentation: 280525

## Slide 1

## Disturbance Ecology of Lodgepole pine :Some Points to Ponder

**Disturbance Ecology of Lodgepole pine :****Some Points to Ponder**

**Wayne D. Shepperd****Research Silviculturist, Retired**
**U.S.F.S., Rocky Mountain Research Station**

## Lodgepole pine

**Lodgepole pine**

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

**Ecologic Characteristics**** of Lodgepole Pine**

- Cone Serotinony varies and is a one-shot chance at regenerating the forest!

-  Planting may be required to regenerate some areas
-  Mechanical or chemical site preparation may be needed to establish seedlings
-  Natural stocking densities are not economically possible

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Sun-loving

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Sun-loving
- Rapid early growth

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Grows in dense stands < 100 years

**BA = 270**

**Avg. Dia. = 6.7 inches**

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Shallow rooted

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Susceptible to mistletoe and mountain pine beetle
- MPB outbreaks don’t destroy forests, they re-arrange them!

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

**Ecologic Characteristics**** of Lodgepole Pine**

- LPP succeeds to spruce and fir
- This process is accelerated by MPB!
- May require active management to re-establish LPP component

## FVS Projection of existing mixed stand – before MPB

## FVS Projection of existing mixed stand – After MPB

## FVS Projection of existing mixed stand – in 100 years

**BA = 297**

## Ecologic Characteristics of Lodgepole Pine

- Sun-loving
- Rapid early growth
- Relatively short lived
- Shallow rooted
- Susceptible to mistletoe and mountain pine beetle

- LPP competes with aspen, so MPB may benefit aspen
- MPB may similarly benefit shrublands and grasslands

## Lodgepole Pine Fire Regimes

- Long interval - Stand Replacement
- Fire return interval may not be out of balance, but the distribution of lodgepole pine age class structure on the larger landscape was likely different than pre-settlement times
-  Many large fires during mining era + subsequent fire supression resulted in more contiguous mature lodgepole pine in landscapes, all susceptible to MPB
- Distribution of LPP age classes after MPB will certainly be different than pre-settlement

## What is the role of management in Lodgepole Pine affected by MPB?Some Questions:

**What is the role of management in Lodgepole Pine affected by MPB?****Some Questions:**

- Manage for what?
- Plant new LPP?
- Manage to break up continuity of age class structure (and fuels) at landscape scales?
- How to manage stocking of LPP for multiple resource values?
- Introduction of alternate vegetation types and successional pathways into landscapes?

## Thanks!
# Presentation: 732293

## Ibuprofen and Renal Failure

- Professor Nicholas Moore
- International Ibuprofen Foundation
- University of Bordeaux, France

## Background

- Renal prostaglandins essential for GFR
- Especially in elderly, children, heart failure
- Known for all NSAIDs
- Some case reports with ibuprofen
- Risk of widespread OTC use?

## In adults

- Better tolerated than aspirin
- Tolerance equivalent to paracetamol
- Including GI and renal events
- In clinical RCT of 8644 adults, used for OTC indications

- Moore N, et al. The PAIN study. Clin Drug Invest 1999;18:89-98.

## Renal Failure in the Elderly

| Dose | OR | 95%CI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ≤ 1200 mg | 0.94 | 0.58 - 1.51 |
| 1200 - 2400 mg | 1.89 | 1.34 - 2.67 |
| ≥ 2400 mg  | 2.32 | 1.45 - 3.71 |

- Griffin MR, Yared A, Ray WA. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and acute renal failure in elderly persons. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151(5):488-96.

- 1799 cases, 9899 controls in Medicaid/care

## In Children

- Randomized DB clinical trial
- Paracetamol vs ibu 10, 15 mg/kg
- Hospital admissions
- 84 000 children incl 27 000 < 2 yrs old
- Not a single case of renal failure
- upper bound CI < 5.4/100 000
- No difference in admission creatinine

- S. M. Lesko, A. A. Mitchell, *Jama* **273**, 929-33 (1995).
- S. M. Lesko, A. A. Mitchell, *Pediatrics* **100**, 954-7 (1997).
- S. M. Lesko, A. A. Mitchell, *Pediatrics* **104**, e39 (1999).

## In Newborns

- As effective as indomethacin to close patent ductus arteriosus
- Without renal toxicity

- L. Cuzzolin, M. Dal Cere, V. Fanos, *Drug Saf* **24**, 9-18 (2001).

## In Overdose

- No need to monitor if less than 6 g (30 tabs)
- Reversible renal failure in severe overdose

- A. H. Hall, S. C. Smolinske,et al, *J Toxicol Clin Toxicol* **30**, 23-37 (1992).
# Presentation: 857388

## Beams Week in Review

- Still Starting up
- working towards pre-shutdown luminosity
- Uncorrelated failures

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Store Summary

| Store # | Initial Luminosity | Duration | Termination | comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1434 | 1.64 E30 | 7.6 hours | intentional | Large emittance/beam loss, lost pbar shots |
| 1443 | 5.14 E30 | 14.67 | intentional | Lost pbar shots
Reduced proton intensity |
| 1448 | 6.45 E30 | 4.83 | quench at A3 | 1-hour proton lifetime, low proton  intensity |

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Summary

- F4 Wet engine off much of Monday
- Luminosity limited by
- large emittances
- beam loss during acceleration
- HV703 load transfer switch
- Angle bump to open up F0 aperture
- Coupling

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Summary

- Core cooling equalizers in design
- Next week?
- 40% improvement in cooling rate now
- 125% improvement with equalizers
- Improved Core and AP3 emittances

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Summary

- Running okay
- Flying wire/multiwire issues
- Q847/MI8 lattice
- HV703 load transfer switch
- 8 GeV coalescing

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- Five shifts of  Tevatron studies to restore luminosity
- Possible access
- Coupling
- Injection
- Lifetime
- Aperture

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- Pbar studies
- Unstacking lattice
- Beam line matching with new lattice
- Parasitic
- MI8 line/Q847
- Recycler protons
- MiniBooNe

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Schedule for this Week

- All Experimenters Meeting
# Presentation: 418881

## Aircraft Service Center Processes

**Aircraft Service Center Processes**

- Presentation 13

## What can a Service Center do for you?

- Develop STC for non-group aircraft
- Covered in another presentation
- Apply SL/SB/STC on group aircraft
- We will discuss here
- Assist in obtaining operational approval
- Additional services ranging from “one stop shop” to a handshake

## What is a group?

- Group = “...aircraft that are of nominally identical design and build with respect to all details that could influence the accuracy of height keeping performance”

## How do you verify your aircraft qualifies as a “group participant”?

- Evaluate any existing modifications
- Assure static system conforms
- Assure avionics meet group standards
- Assure systems are operating within tolerances (autopilot performance)

## What are your first steps?

- Evaluate Engineering Solutions, more than one method of compliance may be available
- Locate capable and qualified Service Center
- Obtain data package
- STC Certificate(s) or SB, Letter of entitlement, Flight Manual Revision or Supplements, Maintenance Manual Revision, Operational Test Procedures, etc.

## Once you have selected a method of compliance and a service center, what must you do?

- Prior to Maintenance
- Verify AFCS stability performance
- Confirm required parts and equipment are present

## What will the service center do?

- Perform incoming inspections, avionics functional checks, pitot static leak checks
- Service center will apply modification
- Equipment Changes
- Skin work
- Pitot Static System Changes
- Paintwork
- Service center will test and inspect, recommend  aircraft for return to service

## What is next?

- At conclusion of service center work you will have an, “ RVSM Compliant Airframe”
- Next after ensuring compliance –FAA Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) makes PTRS entry
- ASI will evaluate operator program and procedures, maintenance program, MEL
- Upon issuance of LOA or OpSpec you will have airframe and operator authorization

## What can go wrong?

- Problems found with in-service aircraft
- Paint
- Stripes in the critical area
- Chips
- Bubbles
- Cracks
- Bumps
- Fisheyes

## More that might go wrong

- Problems found with in-service aircraft
- Pitot Static
- Leaky systems
- Inoperative Pitot Static heat
- Autopilot
- Cable Tensions
- Servo Capstan problems

## Still more that might go wrong

- Problems found with in-service aircraft
- Fuselage
- Excessive Skin Deviations (waviness)
- High Spots at Frames
- Uneven Skin Seams
- Skin Repair in critical areas
- Access or Inspection panels out of tolerance
- Latches or Hinges out of tolerance

## Service centers contacted have facilities available
# Presentation: 701186

## Initializing the ocean carbon system

- Problem:
- 	How to initialize the ocean carbon system to avoid long-term drift in atmospheric CO2?

## The Ideal Case

- initialize oceanic DIC to pre-industrial DIC based on observations
- set the atmospheric pCO2 to 280 ppm
- A perfect model would reproduce observations so that the predicted DIC and pCO2 remain steady with time

## In practice

- The steady state DIC distribution will differ from observations.
- In order to find a solution that is drift-free, one would need to run the model for 2000-30000 years with fixed atmospheric pCO2
- This is impractical for a model like CM2p1

## Proposed Solution

- Find a method to predict the model’s steady-state distribution ahead of time
- Adjust initial DIC distribution accordingly
- Hope to use ~300 year runs of model to find out what we need to know in order to make the appropriate guess

## Background

- Box model vs. GCM controversy

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Current work

- 315 year runs:
- Solubility pump only (kill biology)
- Organic pump only (set gasX T=10°C, S=34.7)
- Full System

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## Slide 18

## Slide 19
# Presentation: 849979

## Testing QCD: Jet Production at CDF

**E****T**** = 633 GeV******** = -0.19**

**Calorimeter LEGO view**

**R-******** view**

**Dijet Mass = 1374 GeV/c****2**

-  Good agreement between Data and Theory
-  Data fully corrected to the hadron level
- NLO uncertainties mainly  from PDFs
-  Gluons at high x

- Jet production results are stringent tests of QCD
-  Perturbative QCD
-  Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs)
- High transverse momentum (PT) tail sensitive to **New Physics**

-  Use KT  algorithm: preferred by theory
-  Infrared/collinear safe to all orders in pQCD
-  No merging/splitting issue

- b-jets include most of b-quark remnants
-  Small dependence on fragmentation
- b-tagging using secondary vertices

**E****T**** = 666 GeV******** = 0.43**

-  Comparison to Pythia Tune A as expected
-  Comparison to NLO will come soon

**Testing QCD: Jet Production at CDF**

- Motivation

- New level of precisionin the knowledge of QCD processes in hadron collisions

- Inclusive Jet Cross Section

- b-jet Cross Section

- 8 orders of magnitude!

- Long lifetime of B hadrons

- High masses of B hadrons

- extract b fraction by fitting templates to the data

## Electroweak Physics at CDF

- W's and Z's are the standard candles of CDF

- WW production in hadron collisions firmly established.
- Important discovery channel at the Tevatron & LHC.

- W : photon PT spectrum sensitive to non-SM couplings.
- Z : search for resonances.

- Acceptance for these events is understood to 2%.
- Track resolution : ******p****T****/p****T**** ~ ****0.15%p****T**
- Cross-section ratios determine fundamental parameters such as the width of the W boson :

**Electroweak Physics at CDF**

- Diboson Physics

- W Mass Measurement

- W & Z Boson Cross Sections

- W (CDF) = 2079 ± 41 MeV

- Calibrate tracker with
- Muons from low-mass
- Resonance decays

- Calibrate tracker with
- Muons from low-mass
- Resonance decays

- Calibrate calorimeter with
- Electrons from W decays

- Model hadronic response
- Using Z->ll events

**Total uncertainty 76 MeV (cf Run 1: 79 MeV)**

| Systematic (Run 1b) | Electrons | Muons | Common |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Production and Decay Model | 30(30) | 30(30) | 25(16) |
| Lepton Energy Scale and Resolution | 70(80) | 30(87) | 25(0) |
| Recoil Scale and Resolution | 50(37) | 50(35) | 50(0) |
| Backgrounds | 20(5) | 20(25) |  |
| Statistics | 45(65) | 50(100) |  |
| Total | 105(110) | 85(140) | 60(16) |

- Run II MW  measurement will significantly constrain the Higgs mass
# Presentation: 144283

## summer grape 

_*Vitis*_ * *_*aestivalis*_  Michx.
-  Synonyms:  _*Vitis*_ * *_*lincecummii*_*, * _*Virufo*_                            * *_*tomentosa*_*, *_*Virufo*_  _*simpsonii*_*,* * *_*Virufo*_* * _*smalliana*_.
- Other common names;  pigeon grape.

**riverbank grape**
_*Vitis*_ * *_*riparia*_  Michx.
- Synonyms:  _*V*_*. * _*vulpina*_*,* * *_*V.*_* * * *_*cordifolia*_*,  *_*V.*_ * *_*Illex*_.
- Other common names;  frost grape, winter grape, fox grape.

**Food:**
- There are two main varieties of grapes in this part of the Great Plains.  Both were used in very similar fashions.  As can be supposed by the common names the summer grape ripens when the weather is still warm and the winter grape ripens towards the cool of the autumn.
- Grapes were eaten raw, the juice diluted with water to make a beverage, the fruits were made into jams and jellies.  Young leaves were boiled in various meal preparations.
**Culturally:**
- Vines were used in basket weaving by several tribes.
**Medicinally:**
- Grape juice was used to treat colds, coughs, throat cancer and tumors.  A poultice was made of the leaves and applied to bruises, sprains and the eyes.

- Photo courtesy of:  Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA SCS. 1991. *Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species*. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth, TX. Courtesy of _[USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute](http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/WLI/)_.

- Slide developed by Pat Broyles, Soil Conservationist, Manhattan, KS. PMC.  USDA is an equal opportunity employer.

- Photo courtesy of:  Bill Summers. USDA SCS. 1991. *Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species*. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth, TX. Courtesy of _[USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute](http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/WLI/)_.
# Presentation: 908717

## The Modeling and Forcings of Global Precipitation

- By Miriam Fogel
- Mentor: Drew Shindell

## Forcings

- _Key_
- Red = All Forcings
- Blue = well-mixed greenhouse gases
- Green = Solar Irradiance
- Orange = Troposphere Aerosols
- Light Blue = Indirect Troposphere Aerosols

- GHG have the largest effect (aerosols cancel)
- Indirect aerosols’ impact around the equator and N. Hemisphere
- All Forcings line is roughly all others combined (some not included)

- 1880-2000; Forcings Effects on Precipitation

## Model vs. Observation

- Major changes in last 30 years for model, no ocean for observation
- Observation has larger increase in precipitation overall
- Perhaps too many aerosols in model
- Especially Sahara getting dryer - crucial

- Model: 1970-2000

- Observation: 1901-2000

## Future Research

- Adjust models for higher accuracy
- Use models for predicting the future
- Aid and warning
- Forcings show what may need to be changed
- How humans affect the environment and precipitation by emissions

## References and Acknowledgments

- Graphs made in Panoply
- Thanks to Dr. Drew Shindell, mentor
- Thanks to everyone at NASA GISS & NYCRI
# Presentation: 789134

## Status of Background Orbit-max Fluxes and Trigger Rates7 August 2001   S. Ritz

- Implementation by source, comparisons and justifications
- Sanity checking – EGRET A-Dome rates
- L1T rates

- see
-  LAT-TD-00250-01 Mizuno et al
-  Note by Allan Tylka 12 May 2000, and presentations by Eric Grove
-  AMS Alcaraz et al, Phys Lett B484(2000)p10 and Phys Lett B472(2000)p215

## Proposed Orbit-max Fluxes

**Proposed Orbit-max Fluxes**

**CrElectron**
**(balloon flux)**
**for comparison only, stops at 100 MeV ?!  What to do below 100 MeV?**

**Nolan’s fit to AMS data**

**SR fit to AMS data, scaled for e+ and e- ~1/E****3.2**

**Flux expected to soften to 1/E around 100 MeV**

**Chime p and GCR(-28.5,110) for  orbit max – we need to check our implementation of this: are we on the opposite side of the earth!?!  Geomagnetic cutoff looks reasonable.**

- (the tools are great!!)

## Sanity Check

- The measurements of the components may have unsubtracted backgrounds – adding them up could result in double-counting.  Also, fluxes below 100 MeV are mostly blind guesses.  Need a unitarity check – look at EGRET A-dome rates.
- The proposed orbit-max flux amounts to ~10 kHz/m2 (don’t ask what it was at the time of the DoE proposal!)
- Also sent fluxes to Eric Grove for comments, and discussed them with experts at Goddard.

## EGRET A-dome Rates (courtesy of Dave Bertsch)

- A-dome has an area of ~6 m2, so orbit max rate (outside SAA and no solar flares) corresponds to ~16 kHz/m2
- This represents a conservative  upper-limit for us, since the A-dome was sensitive down to 10’s of keV.
- Note peak rate is at (24.7,260)

## Rates – Preliminary!

|  | all | chimemax | albedo_p_max | albedo_
gamma | CR e- | albedo e+e- |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| flux (kHz/m2) | 9.9 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 0.92 | 0.043 | 2.2 |
| L1T (Hz) | 13,048 | 7,408 | 3,495 | 259 | 83 | 1,803 |
| L1T frac | 1 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| L1TV (Hz) | 4,914 | 2,443 | 1,632 | 183 | 27 | 628 |
| L1TV frac | 1 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.13 |

- Notes:
-  as we expected, the unthrottled L1T rate is now > 10 kHz
-  with the ACD throttle on the TKR trigger, the total rate is 4.9 kHz.  If the max A-dome rate is due entirely to particles that trigger us (and it likely isn’t), naïve scaling results in an orbit-max throttled rate of 7.8 kHz.  Appears we have some margin.
-  rates are getting more realistic, finally.  Still needs review.
# Presentation: 673356

## Measuring detachment force of C. cresentus by micromanipulation (Jay X. Tang, Brown University)

-   P. Tsang, G. Li, L. B. Freund, Y. V. Brun & J. X. Tang, PNAS, 103:5764, 2006

- A micromanipulation system has been developed to measure the adhesion of single bacterial cells
- The detachment force varies from 0.11 to 2.26 N (14 cells)
- Average force 0.59+-0.62 N
- Adhesion strength (failure stress) 68 N/mm2 =6800 N/cm2
- Such a strength is stronger than super glue, and is equivalent to
- ~hang 70 tons/(10 cm)2
- ~12 elephants on a palm

## News coverage of a breakthrough report on bacterial adhesion

-  P. Tsang, G. Li, L. B. Freund, Y. V. Brun & J. X. Tang, PNAS, 103:5764, 2006

**Science Journals**
- Nature
- Science News
- Discovery Magazine
- Chem Eng News
**Radio/TV**
- NPR News
- CCTV (Chinese)
- BBC News
- Radio Canada
**Newspapers**
- Fox News
- CBC (Canada)
- NRC.NL (Dutch)
**Websites**
- Yahoo Top News
- NSF.gov
- NIH GMS
# Presentation: 870012

## Office of Basic Energy Sciences

** ****	****Materials Sciences**

** ****	****Chemical Sciences**

** ****	****Geosciences**

** ****	****Biosciences**

** ****	****Engineering Sciences**

***Serving the Present, Shaping the Future***

**William Oosterhuis**
**Office of Basic Energy Sciences**

***Office of Energy Research***
***U.S. Department of Energy***

***Office of Basic Energy Sciences***

## Slide 2

## Slide 3

## Slide 4

## Improvements in Quality of X-ray Beams

- 1) Development of Wigglers and Undulators
- 	- Increased Intensity and Brightness
- 	- Experimental Facilities R & D
- 2) Increased Brightness - Better Focussing of Electron Beams
- 	- Beam divergence and cross sections reduced
- 	- Accelerator R & D   (reduced emittance)
- 3) Increased Electron Beam Current
- 	-   Improved RF Systems, Electron Guns
- 	-   Accelerator R & D
- 4) Improved Electron Beam Stability  (Accelerator R & D)
- 	-   Control of Mechanical Vibrations
- 	-   Improved Orbital Feedback Systems
- 	-   Thermal Stability to maintain orbits

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## User Distribution for DOE Synchrotron Light 

**User Distribution for DOE Synchrotron Light **

**Sources**

- 0

- 200

- 400

- 600

- 800

- 1000

- 1200

- 1400

- 1600

- 1800

- 1990

- 1991

- 1992

- 1993

- 1994

- 1995

- 1996

- 1997

- 1998

- Chemical Sciences

- Materials Sciences

- Life Sciences

- Geosciences &

- Ecology

- Applied Science &

- Engineering

- Optical/General

- Physics

- Other

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Slide 11

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14
# Presentation: 122348

## OrganizationalDevelopment Systems CONSORTIUM

- APRIL 22, 2005
- Coaching, Consulting, and Collaboration
- G. Lee Salmon, FCG

## EVALUATION OF COACHING

- Initial Reaction
- Learning
- Application
- Business Impact
- Return on Investment (ROI)

## EVALUATION OF COACHING 

- LEVEL 1: REACTION
- 	Initial reaction of client to coaching experience. Data captured during first 2-3 sessions

## EVALUATION OF COACHING 

- LEVEL 2: LEARNING
- 	What clients have learned from their coaching sessions

## EVALUATION OF COACHING 

- LEVEL 3: APPLICATION
- 	Evaluate how well clients have applied learning and worked toward their commitments. Can include assessments.

## EVALUATION OF COACHING 

- LEVEL 4: BUSINESS IMPACT
- 	Impacts can include output, cost, quality, and time

## EVALUATION OF COACHING 

- LEVEL 5: ROI
- 	Includes all monetary benefits and factors in the fully loaded cost of the initiative and calculate return on investment

## ROI

- DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
- Evaluation strategy and objectives
- Sources of data
- Collection tools
- Analysis approach
- Key events schedule

## ROI

- Several studies show ROI from coaching can range from 500 – 700%
- Detailed study by Booz Allen showed ROI for their internal coaching program of 700%

## TRENDS IN COACHING

- Being increasingly used as a leadership development tool
- An integral part of federal government Senior Executive Candidate Development Programs
- Coaching skills being used to improve the value of mentoring relationships
- Coaching used to help executives lead radical change in organizations

## TRENDS IN COACHING

- Some States looking at licensing for coaches
- Increasing number of therapists entering coaching field
- Concern about coaching certification by some agencies
- Increasing use of coaching as a follow-up to 360 surveys

## CONTACT INFORMATION

- G. Lee Salmon
- Executive Consultant and Coach
- Department of Treasury
- Federal Consulting Group
- (202) 906-6206
- Email _[lee.salmon@ots.treas.gov](mailto:lee.salmon@ots.treas.gov)__ _
# Presentation: 815508

## Lunar Geology for Engineers and ScientistsLecture #8

**Dr.  H. Kent Hills**
- 301-286-9431
- hills@mail630.gsfc.nasa.gov
- February 21, 2006

## Lecture #8

**The ALSEP instruments from the Apollo Program**
- GSFC, Bld 3, Auditorium
- February 22, 2006
- Viewgraphs

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Introduction

- Best NASA plan in 40 years
- “The Vision for Space Exploration” & “NASA’s Exploration Architecture”
- Announcements of Opportunity due this spring
- Our management working very hard to make this happen
- ROSES now out
- It’s Our Job to Win Our Fair Share
- Work as a team

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Lecture Format

- Intro, Short Talk, Q&A, Info Table
- Each starts very basic
- Quickly become state of the art
- References for farther study
- Request Materials:
- Tom Riley, _[John.T.Riley@nasa.gov](mailto:John.T.Riley@nasa.gov)_
- Let me know of other speakers
- Next Lecture:
- #9, Tuesday, April 18, 2006,
- Building 3, Aud

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Dr. Kent Hills Lunar Bio

- Ph.D. from University of Iowa, 1967
- Project Scientist on SIDE during the Apollo missions, at Rice University
- LDP team member
- Now at NSSDC, Code 632, GSFC

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 6

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 7

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 8

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 9

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 10

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 11

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 12

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 13

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 14

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 15

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 16

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 17

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 18

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 19

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 20

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Trial deployment 

**Trial deployment **
**by astronaut**

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 22

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 23

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 24

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 25

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 26

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 27

- Lunar Lecture #8

## Slide 28

- Lunar Lecture #8
# Presentation: 284411

## * Dual Role

**J. H. Shelton, Manager**
- M. K. Strege, Secretary

**Packaging**
**Operations**
**J. C. Copeland**
- L. D. Chapman*
- J. W. Dennis
- A. D. McGee bul
- T. M. McNabb

**Shipping**
**Operations  **
**L. L. Spears***
- K. A. Brown
- J. S. Davis4
- P. M. Garnet*
- R. G. Hamby
- M. D. Parkerbul
- J. S. Parrott
- V. K. Raby
- C. B. Summers***
**DOT Training**
**Lead**
**L.L. Spears**
- P. M. Garnet bul

**Drivers**
- K. R. Adkins
- H. D. Armes3
- T. A. Bass
- G. S. Beck
- D. E. Boyd
- D. L. Castleberry
- H. R. Clower
- A. W. Crass
- L. D. Foust
- D. W. Green
- B. R. Herrell3
- D. C. Kidd
- D. R. Pogue3
- K. C. Pressley3
- K. R. Rogers
- J. M. Wendt
- T. E. Wilson3

**Taxi & Bus Services**
**T. R. Weakley ****bul**
**Taxi Drivers**
- D. A. Cole
- K. E. Parks
**Courier & Mail**
- P. L. Ledford
- T. L. Moore
**Alternate Tour Drivers**
- D. L. Castleberry*
- D. W. Green*

**Transportation Services**
**B. K. Jackson**
**Work Team Leader**

**Fleet Management**
**K. E. Settles**

**Laborers**
- D. S. Bowers
- B. J. Cale
- A. B. Hamby
- H. L. Hodge
- E. W. Justice
- D. L. Phillips
- C. P. Rose

**Vehicle**
** ****Maintenance**
**D. L. Cox**
**Work Team Leader**
- S. R. Bolden
- D. C. Cook
- R. L. Hall
- T. L Housley
- V. G. Langley*
- G. T. Lee
- R. L. Rucker
- W. W. Weaver
- M. H. Wrinkle4

**Heavy Equipment**
** ****Maintenance**
**J. F. Pitts**
**Work Team Leader**
- J. L. Childress
- R. T. Cox
- J. L. Davidson
- M. G. Helton
- J. M. Hill
- V. G. Langley*
- C. R. Larue
- J. A. Mann
- M. A. Roberts
- M. H. Wrinkle4

**LOGISTICAL SERVICES DIVISION**
**J. M. Forstrom, Director**
**B. J. Cherry, Division Secretary**

-  bul Back Up Lead
- 3 Loan Out 100%
-  4 Loan In 100%

**Transportation**
**Safety Compliance **
**D. W. Foster**
- C. B Summers bul

**Garage Services**