# Presentation: 947777

## Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) – Hg Monitoring and Test Methods

**2007 Measurement Technology Workshop**
**Robin Segall and Bill Grimley**
**U.S. Environmental Protection Agency**** **
**OAQPS/AQAD/MTG**
**September 11-13,  2007**

## Outline

**Background**
**CAMR Status**
**Affected Units and their Controls**
**Key Elements of CAMR**
**Mercury Standards**
**Mercury Monitoring and Testing Requirements**
**Monitoring Options**
**Testing Requirements**
**New Alternative Mercury Reference Test Methods Rulemaking**
**Hg Gas Standard Traceability**

## Status of CAMR

**CAMR proposed on January 30, 2004 (69 FR 4652)**
**Section 112(n) Revision promulgated on March 29, 2005 (70 FR 15994)**
**CAMR promulgated on May 18, 2005 (70 FR 28606)**
**Final reconsideration notice published on June 9, 2006 (71 FR 33388)**

## Legal and Administrative Challenges – Section 112(n) Revision and CAMR

**Petitions for Judicial Review**
- States/City
- Environmental Groups
- Industry Groups
- Also intervenors on both sides
**Petitions for Administrative Review**
- States
- Environmental Groups
- Native American Groups
- Integrated Waste Services Assoc
- Jamestown Board of Public Utilities
**Reconsideration process has been completed**
**All briefs have been filed with Court; awaiting schedule for oral arguments**

**Notes:**
States: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin

Environmental Groups:  National Wildlife Federation (NWF), Sierra Club (SC), Environmental Defense (ED), Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF), Conservation Law Foundation (CLF), Waterkeepers Alliance (WA), Ohio Environmental Council (OEC), U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), The Natural Resources Council of Maine (NRCM), and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

## Existing Controls:
Almost all units have PM control devices
About one-third have SO2 scrubbers
Most have initial NOx controls (e.g., low-NOx burners)
About one-third (primarily in the east) will have advanced NOx control (SCR) when NOx SIP-call is fully implemented
Future Controls:
About two-thirds (primarily in the east) will have SO2 scrubbers when CAIR is fully implemented
About one-half (primarily in the east) will have advanced NOx control (SCR) when CAIR is fully implemented

- Almost all units have PM control devices
- About one-third have SO2 scrubbers
- Most have initial NOx controls (e.g., low-NOx burners)
- About one-third (primarily in the east) will have advanced NOx control (SCR) when NOx SIP-call is fully implemented
**Future Controls:**
- About two-thirds (primarily in the east) will have SO2 scrubbers when CAIR is fully implemented
- About one-half (primarily in the east) will have advanced NOx control (SCR) when CAIR is fully implemented

**Coal-Fired Power Plants in the U.S.**

**•   ****Affected Facilities:**
-      –  About 1,300 coal-fired
-          generation units (~ 500 coal-
-          fired power plants) with about
-          305 GW of generation capacity

## Power Plant Equipment and Mercury

**Factors that influence mercury control:**
**Coal type**
**Time/temperature profile**
**Flue gas composition (chlorine) and fly ash characteristics (carbon, calcium, iron, porosity)**
**Air pollution controls already in place**

**Wet Scrubber**

**Hg****0**

**>2500 °F**

**Flue Gas**

**Hg****0****, Hg****+2****, Hg****p**** ****- form important for capture****1**

**700 °F**

**SCR**

**ESP or FF**

**Coal & Air**

**Ash**

**Residue**

**Ammonia**

**Stack**

**Limestone or lime slurry**

- 1 **Hg****0**** = elemental Hg, Hg****+2**** = oxidized Hg, Hg****p**** = particulate Hg**

## Key Elements of CAMR

- Market-Based Cap-and-Trade Program that will reduce nationwide emissions of mercury from _new_ and _existing_ coal-fired power plants in two phases:
- First phase (2010)
- Cap is 38 tons
- Taking advantage of “co-benefit” reduction of mercury achieved by reducing SO2 and NOx under CAIR
- Second phase (2018)
- Cap is 15 tons
- New Source Emission Standards for mercury from coal-fired units under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Da

## Subpart Da Mercury Standards

**Subpart Da revised to require coal-fired units constructed after 1/30/04 to meet ****output-based ****NSPS in addition to being subject to caps**
**Compliance determined on a 12-month rolling average basis, using Hg monitoring data **
**Performance Specification 12A for certifying Hg monitoring systems (promulgated w/ CAMR)**

**New Source NSPS Limits:**

| Subcategory | Hg 
(10-6 lb/MWh) |
| --- | --- |
| Bituminous-fired | 20 |
| Sub-bituminous-fired:
 “Wet” geography
 “Arid” geography | 
66
97 |
| Lignite-fired | 175 |
| IGCC | 20 |
| Coal refuse-fired | 16 |

## CAMR Hg Monitoring Requirements – 

**Cap and Trade Program**

- Units have option to use Hg CEMS or sorbent trap monitoring
- 12-month average
- Low-emitting units (_<_ 29 lb/yr) may qualify for a third option
- Annual stack testing if Hg emissions are _<_ 9 lb/yr
- Biannual testing if Hg emissions are _>_ 9 lb/yr, but _<_ 29 lb/yr
- Revisions to Parts 72, Part 75, and Appendices A, B, and F of Part 75, as well as addition of Appendix K and Subpart I to Part 75 provide the detailed provisions for implementation of Hg monitoring
- Reference method for relative accuracy test audits (RATAs) of monitoring systems
- ASTM D6784-02 (‘Ontario Hydro Method’)
- Administrator approved instrumental test method

## CAMR Hg Monitoring Requirements – 

**40 CFR 60, Subpart Da**

- Units have option to use Hg CEMS or sorbent trap monitoring
- Compliance determined on a 12-month rolling average basis
- Performance Specification 12A specified for Hg CEMS relative accuracy test audits (RATAs)
- Part 75 performance specifications are an option for units subject to cap and trade program
- Reference method for relative accuracy test audits (RATAs) of monitoring systems
- ASTM D6784-02 (‘Ontario Hydro Method’)
- Method 29

## Certification Testing Requirements

- Hg CEMS
- 7-day calibration error test---with Hg0 or Hg2+
- System integrity check at 3-levels, with Hg2+, if the CEMS has a converter
- Linearity check with Hg0
- Cycle time test
- RATA with using a reference method
- Bias test

## Certification Test Requirements (cont.)

- Sorbent Trap Systems
- RATA and bias test
- Applicable QA/QC procedures in Appendix K
- Low-Emitting Units
- Hg testing using Ontario Hydro method (ASTM D6784-02) or an approved instrumental test method
- Certification deadlines
- For existing units --- January 1, 2009
- For new units---90 operating days or 180 calendar days after commencement of commercial operation

## CAIR and CAMR Implementation Timeline

_**Phase I**_**: CAIR NOx Programs (ozone-season and annual)**
**(09)**

_**Phase I**_**: CAIR SO2 Program **
**(10)**

**States develop  SIPs**
**(18 months)**

**SIPs Due**
**(Sep 06)**

**CSP Early Emission Reduction Period **
**(annual CAIR NOx program)**
**(07 and 08)**

**NOx **
**Monitoring **
**and **
**Reporting Required**
**(08)**

**SO2 Monitoring **
**and Reporting Required**
**(09)**

_**Phase II**_**: CAIR ****NOx ****and ****SO2**** Programs Begin**
**(15)**

**Early Reductions for CAIR NOx ozone-season  program and CAIR SO2 program begin immediately because NOx SIP Call and title IV allowances can be banked into CAIR**

**Note**: Dotted lines indicate a range of time.

- 05

- 06

- 07

- 08

- 09

- 10

- 12

- 13

- 14

- 11

- 15

**CAMR Rule signed**

- 18

- 17

- 16

**CAIR**

**CAMR**

**States develop  SIPs**
**(18 months)**

**CAIR Rule signed**

**SIPs Due**
**(Nov. 06)**

_**Phase I**_**: Hg Program **
**(10)**

_**Phase II**_**: Hg Program **
**(18)**

**Hg Monitoring and Reporting Required**
**(10)**

## On-Going QA Requirements

- Hg CEMS
- Daily calibrations---with Hg0 or Hg2+
- Weekly system integrity check, if the CEMS has a converter (not required if Hg2+ is used for daily calibrations)
- Quarterly linearity check with Hg0 or system integrity check with Hg2+
- Annual RATA and bias test

## On-Going QA Requirements (cont.)

- Sorbent Trap Systems
- Annual RATA and bias test
- QA/QC procedures in Appendix K
- Low-Emitting Units
- Semiannual or annual Hg emission testing

## Alternative Hg Reference Methods - Background

- Stakeholders very concerned that OH reference method difficult and, more importantly, not timely (2 to 3 week turnaround)
- We committed in CAMR promulgation to develop instrumental reference method (IRM) for Hg; later recognized that sorbent trap-based reference method also viable
- Development/evaluation had to be rapid
- Over 800 Hg monitoring systems will need RATAs in 2008 to meet 1/1/09 deadline
- Many utilities are planning RATAs for late 2007

## Hg Methods Rulemaking

- Two Additional Reference Method Options for Measurement of Mercury
- Method 30A - Instrumental reference method (IRM)
- Method 30B - Sorbent trap reference method
- Direct Final Approach
- Allows for timely promulgation of methods
- Adverse comment, however, would result in reversion to a proposal

## Hg Methods Rulemaking Schedule

- Rulemaking was signed by Administrator on August 17
- Should be published in the _Federal Register_ by first week in September
- If no adverse comment, would become final in early November

## IRM for Mercury – Method 30A

- Real-time
- Performance-based
- Amenable to new technologies
- Test program-specific verification of data quality
- FR Notice of Intent (October 6, 1997)
- Consistent w/ SOx & NOx instrumental methods
- Key elements
- Calibration error/linearity
- System integrity/conversion efficiency
- System response time
- Interference test
- Dynamic spiking (gaseous method of standard additions)

## Sorbent Trap Method for Mercury – Method 30B

- Performance-based
- Amenable to new sorbents, equipment, and analytical technologies
- Lab verification of sobent performace and analysis
- Test program-specific verification of data quality
- Capability for on-site analysis (timely)
- Description
- Known volume of stack gas is sampled through paired, in-stack 2-section sorbent traps (e.g., iodated carbon)
- Analysis by any suitable system that can meet performance criteria (e.g., leaching, digestion, thermal desorption/direct combustion coupled with UV AF, UV AA, XRF)

## Hg Gas Standards

## Hg Gas Standard Traceability

**Hg Gas Standard Traceability**

- CAMR and Method 30A require “NIST Traceable” Hg gas standards
- NIST Traceability is defined by EPA
- Documented in EPA-600/R-97/121 “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards”
- Traceable to a measured concentration, not theoretical

## How Traceability Protocol Works 

- NIST SRMs and NTRMs are gas standards used by vendors to generate the “protocol” gas standards used by industry and its test contractors
- SRMs and NTRMs  are used to calibrate instrumentation that measure the concentration of the “protocol” gases sold
- EPA Traceability Protocol provides guidance on how to establish the uncertainty of the “protocol” gases sold, traceable to the NIST RMs

## Slide 24

## Status for Hg Gas Standard Traceability

- Gas Generators
- EPA has a working draft of traceability protocol for certifying _elemental_ Hg gas generators
- Includes approach for certifying elemental Hg gas generators that are already in the field
- NIST has certified its ‘NIST prime’ elemental Hg gas generator and is now working on certification of ‘vendor prime’ elemental Hg generators
- EPA is drafting traceability protocol for certifying _oxidized_ Hg gas generators
- EPA/ORD is working on independent gravimetric technique
- Gas Cylinders
- EPA is adding elemental Hg gas cylinder traceability procedures to the existing traceability protocol for SO2 and NOx cylinders
- Shelf life and stability will be assessed

## Next Steps

- Finalization of Methods 30A and 30B
- Additional evaluation of Methods 30A and 30B to allow for further SOP development and potential adjustments to stratification testing requirements
- Completion of Hg calibration gas traceability protocols and procedures
- Development of training materials and conduct of training for EPA Regions, state agencies, and sources