BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 306758

## Individual Program Manager Perspective

- Melissa Hulting
- U.S. EPA
- Great Lakes National Program Office

- Or:  What’s in it for me?

## Slide 2

**Notes:**
I run a program that measures concentrations of PBTs in the air of the Great Lakes.  PBTs and atmospheric deposition are a big concern in the GL due to the large surface area of the lakes and the presence of fish consumption advisories in the lakes.  

## How could I benefit from a nationwide PBT strategy?

- Data for comparison, information sharing
- Lessons learned from others:  methods, siting, etc.
- Resource sharing, investing in common networks

## Data Sharing

- Compare my data to data from other regions of the country:  Is the GL problem unique?  Are rural or urban levels comparable among regions?
- Transport of PBTs between regions
- What is coming to my area from other areas of the country, continent, and world?
- What is my area contributing to other areas?

## Data Sharing

- Emerging pollutants
- What are people seeing that’s “new” in the environment?
- What are the risks/toxicity associated with these contaminants?
- Are they present at significant levels?
- Sources?

## Data Sharing

- How can we combine or improve data so that it is more useful to modelers?
- So modelers can in turn better inform monitoring managers and policy makers
- Can we relate environmental concentrations collected by one party to emissions data from another?

## Data Sharing

- What information has already been gathering through short-term, research-oriented studies that I don’t know about?
- How can we design our monitoring to use that knowledge?

## Data Sharing

- Can we combine data from different media to better predict flows between media?
- Predict changes in fish tissue concentrations from changes in water concentrations
- Are trends similar in different media?

## Learning from others

- Are there new methods that I should know about?
- How much does X type of monitoring typically cost?
- Are there standard methods available?

## Slide 10

## Sharing Resources

- Share site operators, sample collectors
- Multimedia sampling
- Sharing common laboratories
- Pool talents:  analytical knowledge, political knowledge, reporting savvy, etc.
# Presentation: 750887

## Measurement of Out of Tank (Dirt) Events with MiniBooNE
Hai-Jun Yang ( for MiniBooNE Collaboration ), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, Florida, April 14-17, 2007

**Measurement of Out of Tank (Dirt) Events with MiniBooNE**
- Hai-Jun Yang ( for MiniBooNE Collaboration ), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, Florida, April 14-17, 2007

- Out of Tank Events in Enhanced Dirt Sample

**Goal:** The MiniBooNE experiment is designed to confirm or refute ***e* oscillation signal seen by LSND

-  The FNAL Booster delivers 8 GeV protons to the MiniBooNE beamline.
-  The protons hit a 71cm beryllium target producing pions and kaons.
-  The magnetic horn focuses the secondary particles towards the detector.
-  The mesons decay into neutrinos, and the neutrinos fly to the detector,
-   all other secondary particles are absorbed by absorber and 450 m dirt.
-  5.6E20 POT for neutrino mode since 2002.
-  Switch horn polarity to run anti-neutrino mode since January 2006.

-  L/E, MiniBooNE (0.5 km / 0.8 GeV)
-  L/E, LSND (0.03km / 0.05 GeV)
-  About 0.8 GeV  beam (~ 0.5% intrinsic e)
-  1.5 M neutrino events collected
-  Looking for a few hundred e CCQE
-  Major background sources are intrinsic e (~60%),
-    mis-ID (~30%) and out of tank events (~10%)

-  Neutrino beam interacts with dirt outside of tank, the high energy 
-   (100 ~ 300 MeV) sneak into the tank to produce e-like Cerenkov ring.
-  N_dirt_expected =621, N_tank_expected=726 , N_data = 1349
-  N_dirt_measured / N_dirt_expected = 0.99 ± 0.15
-  Dirt events contribute ~10% of background for oscillation e search.

- U – unit vector of reconstructed track direction
- R – vector from tank center to track center
# Presentation: 749210

## Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office 

- Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office** **
**FY 2005 NPL Program Snapshot**
*Federal Environmental Cleanups that Put Citizens First*

**National Priorities List (NPL) Information Summary**

***Status of NPL Federal Facilities***

_**Notes:**_**  ****	****All data from 10/14/2005 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facilities.  **

***NPL Federal Facilities by Agency***
***(Proposed, Final and Deleted)***

**Other Federal Agencies include: Coast Guard (1), DOI (2), DOT (1), EPA (1), FAA (1), NASA (2), SBA (1), USDA (2)*

**Total number of Federal Facilities and  private sites on the NPL is 1,609.*

**21**

**42**

**3**

**54**

**1**

**45**

**1**

**11**

***NPL Federal Facility Site Cleanup Pipeline***

**178**

**151**

**131**

**61**

**47**

**14**

**Facilities **
**with IAGs**

**Final Remedy Selected**

**Deleted **
**Facilities**

**Active RABs/SSABs**

**NPL**
**Facilities**

**All Construction Completed**

***Current Site Work***

***Completed Site Work***

## Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office 

**FY 2005 NPL Program Snapshot**

_**Notes:**_** ****	****All data from 10/14/2005 CERCLIS 3 except where noted.  **
**	****NPL cleanup data includes both Superfund and RCRA activity at Superfund Federal Facilities.  **

**Environmental Indicators at Federal Facilities**

***EI Status for Final NPL Federal Facilities (CERCLA)***
***(Total Facilities = 171*)***

_**Groundwater**_

_**Human Exposure**_

***Remedial Actions and Removal Actions with Institutional Controls***

- Note:  There are 130 NPL Federal Facilities with Institutional Controls.

**Institutional Controls at NPL Facilities**

**Status of 5 Year Review Protectiveness Statements**

***Status of Remedies Requiring Monitoring ***
***at NPL Facilities***
*Total Number of Sites with Completed 5 Year Reviews = 117*
***(Latest Protectiveness Statement at Site)***

***RCRA High Priority Facilities***
***Total Facilities: 160***
*Source: RCRIS 7/5/2005*

- * One (1) newly listed site does not have Environmental Indicator data coded yet.
- Note:  49% of Facilities have both Human Exposure and Groundwater controlled;
- 6% of Facilities have neither Human Exposure nor Groundwater controlled

**Interagency Agreements**

- *This SBA site (Cal West Metals) is Deleted from the NPL.

**Land Reuse**

***Number of Acres at NPL Facilities ***
***Made Available for Reuse (in Thousands)***
**(at 72 Facilities)**

*Number of Acres*

**** Total # of acres made available for reuse at Facilities with EPA involvement (BRAC, NPL, and Non-NPL) = 487.7.  Acreage at NPL BRAC Installations = 293.0, other NPL acreage = 46.4 Does not include property transferred between Federal Agencies.***

- 339.4*

- Note:  In the second quarter of FY 2005, EPA implemented a change in the way 5 Year Review data is recorded.
# Presentation: 490090

## X-ray Scattering Studies of Electrified Liquid-Liquid InterfacesMark L. Schlossman, University of Illinois at ChicagoPetr Vanysek, Northern Illinois UniversityCHE-0535644 and CHE-0315691ChemMatCARS NSF CHE-0087817

- Ion distributions near charged interfaces in electrolyte solutions underlie many electrochemical and biological processes, as well as many practical applications in analytical and electrochemistry. Theory and simulations indicate that these ion distributions depend upon the liquid structure, such as the ion and solvent sizes and correlations between ions and solvents.  However, experimental evidence for this has been scarce.  Using synchrotron x-rays at the ChemMatCARS facility at the Advanced Photon Source to probe the ion distributions, we have recently demonstrated the dependence of this distribution on the liquid structure.

- X-ray reflectivity (versus wave vector transfer) for different concentration solutions, which produce different interfacial electric potentials.  Disagreement with the standard Gouy-Chapman theory is evident.  Agreement with a numerical solution of a Poisson-Boltzmann equation that utilizes a potential of mean force, which accounts for liquid structure, is shown.

- Science **311**, 216 (2006)
- J. Electroanalytical Chemistry **593**, 142 (2006)
# Presentation: 713993

## Implementation Plan

-  **Design ****A****Target****@**** GRIDS**
** ****Full Sensitivity**
** ****Unattended 24/7/365 Operations**
** ****Real-Time Graphical Output to ATC, Pilots, Forecasters (2 min update)**
** ****Auto Calibration and Health**
** ****Zenith Option**
-  **Build ****A****Upgradable****@**** GRIDS**
** ****Fast-Track Effort**
** ****Use ****A****Target****@**** Blueprint**
** ****Borrow Components**
** ****Less Sensitive**
** ****Semi-Autonomous**
** ****Goal: Participate in AIRS -II (Nov ****>****03)**
-  **Evolve to Final GRIDS**
**Tentatively scheduled for completion in FY06**
**Timeline is Partner-Dependent (FAA; NWS)**
** ****Ends with Extended Demo/Assessment @ a Great Lakes Airport**
# Presentation: 181163

## Turbomachinery Flowfield Temperature                                                                    Measurement Linear Imaging Diagnostics

**ACCOMPLISHMENTS**
-  	Demonstrated the feasibility of non-intrusive measurement     	of temperature and density in a flowing gas stream
-  	Developed an optical measurement technique for 		use in compressor flow fields
**COMMERCIALIZATION**
-  	$11K Phase III funding for further development of the 	temperature measurement system at Glenn’s compressor 	test facility
-  	A new approach for non-intrusive measurement of gas 	temperature based on an O2-LIF technique has been 	demonstrated at GRC as a result of the Phase III funding
-  	GRC may use additional Phase III funds for demonstration 	tests in a compressor after reviewing results in the final 	report

***Aerodyne Research, Inc.***
***Billerica, MA***

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**

**GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
-  	This technique will be used in the “Smart Green Engine” 		Program
-  	Will be used in the NASA Physics and Process Modeling 		Program (PPM)
-  	Useful in turbomachinery research over a temperature 		range of 300K-500K
-  	Useful in research applications requiring non-intrusive 		measurement of gas temperature

- Glenn Research Center
- Instrumentation
- 3-034

**Turbomachinery Flowfield Temperature                                                                    Measurement Linear Imaging Diagnostics**

***Linear Imaging Temperature Measurement System Design***

**INNOVATION**

- 1991 Phase II, NAS3-27000, 6-99
- NASA Contact - Mark P. Wernet
- Company Contact - Kurt  D. Annen

- Non-intrusive measurement of gas temperature and/or density for use in turbomachinery
# Presentation: 017581

## SURVIVAL SIGNALS LISTENING TO YOUR INTUITION

- Cheryl L. Wieser
- Regional Security Officer
- Western Region Security Office
- Seattle, WA
- 206-526-6653

- Updated 12/12/2001

## FORCED TEAMING

- USE OF WORD “WE”
- ESTABLISH RAPPORT
- ESTABLISH PREMATURE TUST
- PROJECTION OF SHARED PREDICAMENT
- DONE IN A REMOTE OR ISOLATED AREA

## CHARM & NICENESS

- NOT AN INHERENT ABILITY
- “TO CHARM IS TO COMPEL, TO CONTROL BY ALLURE OR ATTRACTION”
- NICENESS DOES NOT EQUAL GOODNESS
- NICENESS IS A DECISION, NOT A TRAIT
- WOMEN ARE EXPECTED TO RESPOND ONLY AND WARMLY TO MEN

## TOO MANY DETAILS

- TRUTH REQUIRES NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS
- REMEMBER THE CONTEXT
- A STRANGER APPROACHED YOU
- UNSOLICITED CONTACT WAS MADE

## THE UNSOLICITED PROMISE

- QUESTIONABLE MOTIVE
- CONVINCE US OF INTENTION
- NO GUARANTES OR COMPENSATION FOR FAILURE
- THE PROMISE WILL REFLECT YOUR DOUBT & INTIAL INTUITIVE SIGNAL
- SEEKING YOUR TRUST

## DISCOUNTING THE WORD “NO”

- NEVER NEGOIATE THE WORD “NO”
- IN CHOOSING NOT TO HEAR IT, SOMEONE IS ATTEMPTING TO CNTROL YOU
- NEGOTIATION PROVIDES POSSIBILITIES

## THE INTERVIEW

- WILL YOU ENGAGE IN CONVERSATION WITH A STRANGER WHEN YOU’D RATHER NOT?
- CAN YOU BE MANIPULATED BY GUILT OR THE FEELING THAT YOU OWE SOMEONE SOMETHING?

## THE INTERVIEW

- WILL YOU YIELD TO SOMEONE’S WILL OR BE STRENGTHENED WHEN SOMEONE IS TRYING TO CONTROL YOU?
- WILL YOU HONOR YOUR INTUITION?

## THE ALARM

- INTUITION IS ALWAYS RIGHT IN TWO VERY IMPORTANT WAYS:
- IT IS _ALWAYS_ IN RESPONSE TO SOMETHING
- IT _ALWAYS_ HAS YOUR BEST INTEREST AT HEART

## RESOURCE MATERIAL

- Gavin DeBecker - “THE GIFT OF FEAR”
- National Domestic Violence Hotline          1-800-799-SAFE
- WA State Domestic Violence Hotline        1-800-562-6025
- Eastside Domestic Violence Program         1-800-827-8840

## RESOURCES

- King County Coalition Against Domestic Violence - 206-586-5454
- Domestic Violence Recorded information Line - 206-205-5555
- Domestic Abuse Women’s Network (DAWN) - 206-622-1881
- Asian Counseling & Referral Service      206-695-7610
- Consejo Counseling & Referral Service (Services in Spanish) 206-461-4880
# Presentation: 254491

## Final North America Scene Selection using LASSI

## Sensor Visualization

**Sensor Visualization**

- 1374 scenes (L5: 365, L7: 1009, L7 no fill: 18)

## NDVI Visualization

**Normalized to %max**

## Area Coverage 

- Average: 93.6%

## Day of Year

## Cloud Coverage

- Base: Avg ACCA= 0.744, Fill: Avg ACCA= 1.506

## Initial Africa results

## Sensor Visualization

- 1212 scenes (L5: 4, L7: 1208, L7 no fill: 20)

## NDVI Visualization

**Normalized to %max**

## Area Coverage 

- Average: 96.8%

## Day of Year

## Cloud Coverage

- Base: Avg ACCA= 0.589, Fill: Avg ACCA= 0.731
# Presentation: 016431

## Gesture Based Multimedia Information Kiosk Cybernet, Ann Arbor, MI

- Innovation
- Cybernet’s gesture recognition and tracking system is capable of recognizing and tracking intentional hand and body motions performed by a human participant, without requiring the user to wear any special tags or clothing. These motions are then translated by the system into various commands, which can be used to control a range of devices and software applications

- Accomplishments
- Cybernet has developed and successfully launched a commercial software product called UseYourHead. This product, is currently available for on-line, download purchase through our website (www.useyourheadsw.com) and will be available in retail stores starting the week of December 18th.
- UseYourHead tracks the head movements of a person and translates them into keystrokes.
- UseYourHead, along with a USB PC Camera, allows a person to control PC games with head movements as an additional input device to be used in conjunction with a keyboard, joystick, and mouse.
- The product will also be released as a retail bundle that includes a USB PC Camera in late December
- Based on our early success at NASA, the United States Army has provided over a  million dollars in funds for the  development of gesture recognition systems for identifying both close and distant Army Scout gestures.

- Commercialization
- Gesture-Controlled Interfaces for Self-Service Machines and Other Applications. Filed 8/10/99.
- Behavior Recognition System. Filed 3/31/00.
- Real-time Object Tracking Systems with Automatic Initialization. Provisional filed 3/2/00.
- Interactive Physical Training System. Provisional filed 5/31/00
- Head Tracking for Video Games. Provisional filed 6/14/00.
- Tracking and Gesture Recognition System Adapted for Vehicular Control Applications. Provisional filed 11/1/00.
- Current markets are the PC game market and the military simulation market.
- Future markets may include the disabled, vehicle occupant sensors, kiosk control, smart toys, and PC office tools.

- Government Applications
- Cybernet’s current project is focused on developing a gesture controlled kiosk interface to be used with the Virtual Astronaut web tour. This kiosk will most likely be installed at Moody Gardens(Galveston, TX  Resort) to showcase the technology.
- Cybernet is also  using the technology to enhance military training simulators to allow participants to communicate with computerized forces automatically through gestures. Soldiers often communicate with gestures, but there is currently no way of practicing these in the simulated environment.

- Points of Contact:
-    -  NASA--Jane I Fox: jifox@ems.jsc.nasa.gov
-    -  Company--info@cybernet.com
- 1997 SBIR Phase II; NAS 9 99079

- NASA Field Center
- Date of Update: 122000
- Success Story 09-50
# Presentation: 691240

## Ethical Considerations in Cognitive  Research 

- Eva Caldera
- University of New Mexico
- Institute for Ethics
- School of Law
- _[ecaldera@salud.unm.edu](mailto:ecaldera@salud.unm.edu)__ _

##    Brain transplantation is a way to the future!

**   ****Brain transplantation is a way to the future**!

- http://216.247.9.207/bthtml/samples3.htm

## The Big Picture – Philosophical Issues 

- What is human nature?  (And should it be enhanced?)
- Do humans have free will? (Or are all choices determined by physical causes – genes, neurons, etc.?)

## Slide 4

## Applied Ethics – More Specific Issues 

- Science focused on individuals – opportunities and challenges
- Brain privacy
- Cognitive ownership
- Cognitive identity

## Ethical Conduct of Research 

- Importance of informed consent
- Individual consent in research
- Societal consent through dialogue
- Elements of informed consent
- Competence
- Voluntariness
- Disclosure of material information
- Understanding of that information
- Agreement

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9
# Presentation: 462278

## Procedures for Maintaining the Club 

- Involve youth and leaders in planning and conducting the meetings.
- Involve club members in preparing a yearly club plan.
- Promote and market the club.
- Help youth transition to new communities when families move

## Life Skills Addressed in Club Meetings 

- Leadership
- 				Communication
- Responsible Citizenship
- 				Goal Setting
- Decision Making
- 				Problem Solving
- Planning/Organizing

## Life Skills Addressed in Club Meetings

- Cooperation
- 				Managing Feelings
- Character
- 				Accepting Differences
- Social Skills
- 				Critical Thinking
- Keeping Records

## Life Skills Addressed in Club Meetings

- Learning to Learn							Teamwork
- Community Service 						Volunteering
- Sharing									Marketable Skills
- Self-esteem

## Critical Elements in Planning Effective Meetings 

- Identifying specific life skills to target through a meeting format.
- Involving youth along with their leaders in the planning of the meetings.
- Guiding the planning to assure balance and variety in the opportunities offered.

## Club Meeting Format Formula 

- 15-min. business
- 30– 45 min. education
- 15-30 min. recreation

## Club Environments that Meet Basic Needs 

- Promote Feelings of Acceptance and Belonging
- Provide Opportunities to Develop Relationships
- Provide Safety and Structure

## Club Environments that Meet Basic Needs

- Provide Opportunities to Contribute to the Group
- Promote Competence and Independence
# Presentation: 826711

## RHIC Machine Status

- Wolfram Fischer
**— ****Run Coordinator for Run-4 Gold-Gold Operation ****—**
**For the C-A RHIC Team**
- RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting19 March 2004

## Content

- Run-4 Au-Au luminosity development
- Low energy run preparation
- Summary

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                                             17 March 2003

- Stores during last week, Monday to Monday

**60e9 Au****intensity**

**beam experiments**

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                                             17 March 2003

- As of 03/14/04 24:00   Star     	0.9   Phobos 	0.3    Brahms 0.4

- Delivered 1196 (b)-1 to Phenix [week ago : 1060]                   136 (b)-1 last week [best week:  158]

## RHIC                                                                                                                                           Time in store

- [last month]

- [last month]

- [last month]

- [last month]

- [1st 8 weeks]

-  new target including:           11h beam exper.
- 10h maintenance

- Comments: - Not all store time used by experiments (initial background, detector turn-on, etc.)
- - Usable store time differs from experiment to experiment

- [Best week withoutmaintenance: 66%]

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                                             17 March 2003

- Low energy run: 31.2GeV/u total beam energy
- Tested ramp without beam (Al, George, Johannes)
- Thursday: test ramp with beam (10 hrs) Accelerated and stored beam, started rf re-commissioning
- Wednesday 24-March, 8am: switch to low energy Need to reach production fast, only small changes after setup
- 24h shifts scheduledfor 3 days
- Finish ramp development
- Re-commission rf storage system
- Other systems (ZDC, BLM,gap cleaning, collimation)

- 3/8/04

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                 Set-up for 62.4GeV/u cm energy

- 1st ramp to 31.2GeV/u successful

- M. BaiJ. van ZeijtsG. Ganetis
- A. Marusic

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                 Set-up for 62.4GeV/u cm energy

- Beam rebucketed at lower energy

- M. BrennanM. Blaskiewicz

## RHIC Run-4                                                                                                 Set-up for 62.4GeV/u cm energy

- About 50Hz ZDC rates (gains not adjusted, 23 bunches/ring)

- T. SatogataJ. van Zeijts

## Summary

- Delivered Au-Au luminosity exceed most optimistic assumptions:delivered >1200(b)-1 to PHENIX in 11 weeks(almost the same to STAR, 1/3 to BRAHMS and PHOBOS)
- Calendar time in store increased to 50%
- Low energy run setup on track
# Presentation: 462037

## The 2008-2009 U. S. Winter Outlook

**Michael Halpert**
**Deputy Director**
**Climate Prediction Center**
**Mike.Halpert@noaa.gov**
**http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov**

## Outline

- Seasonal tools
- 2008-09 U. S. Winter (DJF) Outlook

## Pacific SSTs

## December - February OCN

**1998-2007**

**Temperature**

## December - February OCN

**1998-2007**

**Precipitation**

## IRI – MME DJF Forecasts

## Consolidation Forecast

- Objective skill-weighted combination
- of statistical tools, CFS, trend

## Winter 2008-09 Outlook Rationale

- ENSO-neutral conditions are currently observed in the Pacific.
- This is expected to persist through the winter.
- NAO (AO) has been and continues to be erratic. Large swings possible in any year
- Variability due to intraseasonal oscillations possible (likely)
- Trends favor above-normal temperatures over much of nation and drier-than-average conditions in the Southeast.

## December 2008 – February 2009 

**Temperature Outlook**

## December 2008 – February 2009 

**Precipitation Outlook**
# Presentation: 372800

## Introduction: Non-Prescription Mevacor® 20 mgJoint Advisory Committee MeetingNDA 21-213

- Charles J. Ganley, M.D.
- Food and Drug Administration
- Director, Division of OTC Drug Products
- January 13, 2005

## New Model for an OTC Drug

- Treat asymptomatic disease
- Long term compliance necessary to obtain benefit (prevent first heart attack)
- Laboratory monitoring to assess efficacy
- Requires highly motivated individual to decide to use the product according to product label for a long period of time

## Drug Related Hurdles for OTC Marketing

- Assessment of relative safety
- Adverse events associated with therapy
- Risk of serious muscle injury
- Risk of liver injury
- Conditions that may increase the risk of adverse events
- Population at risk
- Underlying liver injury
- Pregnancy or use by women of child bearing potential
- Drug interactions

## Disease Related Hurdles for OTC Marketing

- Multiple steps to assess eligibility criteria for self selection
- Monitoring and knowledge of cholesterol levels
- After initiating therapy, change in risk (e.g. new medication) that may necessitate stopping OTC therapy
- Benefit derived from long term use

## Consumer Behavior Studies

- Label Comprehension Study
- Results used to adjust label prior to an actual use study or prior to marketing
- Not always predictive of behavior (e.g. Consumer understands the label but they do something different)
- Actual Use Study
- Self selection
- Deselection

## Results from Consumer Behavior Studies

- Based on education and literacy, cannot expect 100% success for all of the objectives (some are more important than others)
- Threshold for tolerating behavior errors
- dependent on the health consequence of the error
- Extrapolation to an OTC population

## Analyses

- According to label criteria
- According to Label, Medically Acceptable for Self Management (AL-MASM)
- Closely adhering to label benefit criteria
- Complementary Assessment of Benefit and Safety (CABS)
- AB-MASM, NAB-MUSM, NAS-MUSM

## Population  

- Who is this product directed to:
- People who fit the criteria on the proposed Mevacor label
- Any person who fits the NCEP guidelines for treatment
- People who have an interest in their health and lowering cholesterol
- United States Population

## Other Relevant Information

- OTC Drug Advertising Regulated by the FTC
- Important because advertising will lead consumers to look into using the product
- Economic Implications of Switch
- When considering a drug for switch, FDA does not take economic considerations into account during the decision process
- Cost of the drug
- Insurance coverage
# Presentation: 263335

## DOE Energy Sciences Network

- Chin Guok (chin@es.net)ESnet Network Engineer
- W. E. JohnstonESnet Manager and Senior ScientistLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

**Optical Network Testbeds**
**September 13, 2005**

- ESnet v2.1

## ESnet, Science Data NetworkPlanned Lambda Infrastructure (Based on NLR)

**Denver**

**Seattle**

**Los Angeles**

**San Diego**

**Chicago**

**Pittsburg**

**Raleigh**

**Jacksonville**

**Atlanta**

**Kansas City**

**Baton Rouge**

**El Paso - ****Las Cruces**

**Phoenix**

**Pensacola**

**Dallas**

**San Antonio**

**Houston**

**Albuquerque**

**Tulsa**

**New York**

**Cleveland**

**Boise**

**Washington DC**

**2005: San Diego – Sunnyvale - Seattle**

**2007: Seattle – Chicago – Washington DC – New York**

**2008: Washington DC – Atlanta – Jacksonville – Los Angeles**

**2009: San Diego – Sunnyvale – Seattle – Chicago – Washington DC – Atlanta - Jacksonville**

**2010: San Diego – Sunnyvale – Seattle - Chicago**

**Sunnyvale**

## Optical Services Roadmap

- 2005            2006            2007            2008            2009            2010

- Dedicated lightpaths

- Dynamic lightpath allocation

**Optical Services Roadmap**

## Optical Technologies Roadmap

- 2005            2006            2007            2008            2009            2010

- GMPLS

**Optical Technologies Roadmap**

## Interoperability Capabilities Roadmap

- Dynamic provisioning of MPLS circuits (Layer 3)
- Interoperability between VLANs and MPLS circuits(Layer 2 & 3)
- Interoperability between GMPLS circuits, VLANs and MPLS circuits (Layer 1-3)

- 2005            2006            2007            2008            2009            2010

**Interoperability Capabilities Roadmap**

## Tying Domains Together (1/2)

**Motivation**:
- For a virtual circuit service to be successful, it must
- Be end-to-end, potentially crossing several administrative domains
- Have consistent network service guarantees throughout the circuit
**Observation:**
- Setting up an intra-domain circuit is easy compared with coordinating an inter-domain circuit
**Issues:**
- Cross domain authentication *and* authorization
- A mechanism to authenticate and authorize a bandwidth on-demand (BoD) circuit request must be agreed upon in order to automate the process
- Multi-domain Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs)
- Domains may have very specific AUPs dictating what the BoD circuits can be used for and where they can transit/terminate
- Domain specific service offerings
- Domains must have way to guarantee a certain level of service for BoD circuits
- Security concerns
- Are there mechanisms for a domain to protect itself (e.g. RSVP filtering)

## Tying Domains Together (2/2)

**Approach**:
- Utilize existing standards and protocols (e.g. GMPLS, RSVP)
- Adopt widely accepted schemas/services (e.g X.509 certificates)
- Collaborate with like minded projects (e.g. JRA3 (GEANT), BRUW (Internet2/HOPI) to:
- 1. Create a common service definition for BoD circuits
- 2. Develop an appropriate User-Network-Interface (UNI) and Network-Network-Interface (NNI)
# Presentation: 671734

## SVT online status polling script

- Goals: poll various SVT, CDF, and Tev information every 10 minutes
- Export to ASCII “ntuple”
- Track and plot (e.g. on web) “status of SVT” vs time in a concise way (monitor ~10 numbers vs time)
- Here’s a rough draft ....

## Current “raw data” per 10 minutes

- .date
- Tue Oct  8 07:20:00 CDT 2002
- .daqstat
- store 1832 977GeV 914.65MINS L=11.80E30
- 805.0/949.4/nb 42deg
- stack 117.54mA @7.49mA/h
- run 152602 ACTIVE
- L1Hz=50 L2Hz=119 DT=0.00%
- nL1=141,294,103 nL2=2,666,002
- PHYSICS_1_02[6,165,321] asof 07:18:57 since 01:57:39
- L1TT= L2charm=598.40 ExprD0= ExprW=8.92
- x=-1806 y=4559 dx=536 dy=172
- chisq 13.29 chisqgb 8.59 proctime 25.28 davg -1.45 drms 130.02
- dresol 56.21 dtail 0.121 ntrkgb 1.52 ntrk 2.07 nxtrp 7.25
- .spycheck
- hello world
- Processing /cdf/people1/ashmansk/bin/spycheck.C...
-            W0   W1   W2   W3   W4   W5   W6   W7   W8   W9   WA   WB
- davg_B0     5   -1   -6    7   -3    1    0    1    0   -1   -1   -4
- davg_B1    12  -16    1    1   -1   -4   -1    0    3   -9   -1   -2
- davg_B2    -0    6    1    6    1    0    9   67   -4   11    0    2
- davg_B3   -12    6    2   -7   -6   -2    1    6    0   -9  -13    1
- davg_B4   -16    0    7  -11   -1    0    0   -3    0   -9   -2    1
- davg_B5   -29    1    3    2   -5   -6   -5  -17    7   12   -3   -3
- dtail_B0   11   13   13   19   11   14    0   16   15   13   14   24
- dtail_B1   13   12   11   15   11   15   13    0   12   13   13   13
- dtail_B2   11   10   12   10   10    0   11   34   12   12    0   12
- dtail_B3   12   11    9   11   10   13   11   14    0    9   13   10
- dtail_B4   14    0   11   11   11   14    0   10    0   13   11   12
- dtail_B5   19   13   13   14   10   12   13   11   13   12   13   13
- chisqw     13   14   13   14   13   15   14   15   13   13   13   13

- rate_B0    38*  98   98   68   90  100    0*  89   86   99   90   45*
- rate_B1    35*  93   82   90    7* 100   86    0*  84   95   85   92
- rate_B2    76   86   88  100   93    0*  80   13*  79   72    0*  86
- rate_B3    76   85   70  100   93   91   78   48*   0*  81   76   70
- rate_B4    73    0*  83  100   93   93    0*  73    0*  91   61   76
- rate_B5    76   97   96  100   88   81   88   79   87   32*  91   96
- dead 9 B0W6 B1W4 B1W7 B2W5 B2WA B3W8 B4W1 B4W6 B4W8
- ineff 6 B0W0 B0WB B1W0 B2W7 B3W7 B5W9
- chisq 13.29
- chisqgb 8.59
- proctime 25.28
- davg -1.45
- drms 130.02
- dresol 56.21
- dtail 0.121
- ntrkgb 1.52
- ntrk 2.07
- nxtrp 7.25
- (int)0
- .done

## Example output graphs (first days)

- Emittance growth?

## Beam position, slope vs time

## Luminosity, # dead, #ineff wedges
# Presentation: 950238

## Early Exhibit Concept CD-doc-2244, version 1 

- Early Exhibit Concept **CD-doc-2244, version 1**

## Proposed Theme

- The computing tools and resources at Fermilab have a common element of creating innovative computing solutions and services through the combined  efforts of many individuals world wide

## Possible Approach

- and accomplishments through the conduit of
- personal stories of the professionals involved
- with Fermilab Computing
-  Open café-like exhibition space
-  6 to 8 content stations staffed with computing professionals
-  Large screen video essays portraying personnel
-   stories of computing professionals
- Large Time Line Poster
- Four mural size Fermilab Images

## Proposed Exhibit Title

- _[“Greater than the Sum of Its](http://www.plasticbag.org/files/greater/)__[ ](http://www.plasticbag.org/files/greater/)__[Parts”](http://www.plasticbag.org/files/greater/)_

## Design

- 1

- 2

- 3

- 4

- 1 Large Photos
- 2 Text and Photos
- 3 TIMELINE Poster
- 4 Large  Video Screen

## A Timeline Example

- From the AD Top Turns Ten Exhibit
- Next four slides
- 26 feet long in actuality

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Draft Layout of Computing Timeline

## Potential Domains of Timeline

-  Listing of Major Hardware Acquisition and the Time of Service
- Size of Network  ie: volume, speed, number of nodes
- Listing of Dept/Division Heads
- Listing of Computing Accomplishments/Specific milestones
- Number of People Served by Computing Over the Years
- Inventory of new words created by and for Computing Effort
- Technology , Data Storage, amount of data
- Detectors number of channels , size of detectors, rate of trigger
- -Size of collaborations
- Performance of Accelerator
- Power and cooling detail,  amount of processing power
- Power density
- Others – all indexed along the timeline...
# Presentation: 113846

## Tour Begins

- Here

- You are here

- DØ Tour
- Saturday
- 13-Jan-2001

- 151

- 177

- 173

- Road

## Tour Begins

- Here

- You are here

- DØ Tour
- Saturday
- 13-Jan-2001

- 151

- 177

- 173

- Road

## Tour Begins

- Here

- You are here

- DØ Tour
- Saturday
- 13-Jan-2001

- 151

- 177

- 173

- Road

## Tour Begins

- Here

- You are here

- DØ Tour
- Saturday
- 13-Jan-2001

- 151

- 177

- 173

- Road

## Tour Begins

- Here

- You are here

- DØ Tour
- Saturday
- 13-Jan-2001

- 151

- 177

- 173

- Road

## DØ Tour

## DØ Tour

## DØ Tour
# Presentation: 428418

## Temperature Validation Report     by Steven Pawson

- Based on presentations by:
- Hyunah Lee (HIRDLS)
- Michael Schwartz (MLS)
- Thierry Leblanc (Lidar-MLS)
- Robert Herman (TES)
- and the discussion that followed

## Summary of Validation

- Wide range of comparisons performed:
- Aura - Aura
- Aura - other sensors
- Aura - in-situ
- Aura - meteorological analyses
- Biases and differences:
- Relative biases isolated
- Absolute biases sometimes clear
- Can explain some differences
- Next-generation algorithms being developed

## HIRDLS Summary

- HIRDLS v2.0 biases, mainly due to Kapton correction algorithm:
- GEOS-4: -10 K near 50 km, 0K near 30 km, and less than 2 K in the lower stratosphere.
- MLS: -1 K bias in the lower stratosphere.
- HIRDLS-MTP/MMS differences near tropopause:
- Differences of more than 5K can occur
- These are because of incorrect cloud detection.** **

## Systematic bias in HIRDLS

**Systematic bias in HIRDLS**

**4-31 May 2006**

**-10 K near 50 km**

**0 K near 30 km**

**Less than 2 K  in the lower stratosphere**

**bias due to cloud**

## CR-AVE : HIRDLS, MTP, MMS

## MLS Summary

- Validated V1.5 and V2.1 of data (V2.2 soon)
- Vertical resolution in troposphere of V2 is better (~5 vs ~8 km)
- Bias in stratosphere decreased in V2.1:
- +3K in V1.5 to slightly negative values
- Reduces geopotential heights in strat/mesosphere
- Zig-zag of ~2K in lower stratosphere of V2.1: arises from merging of different radiances in this region
- Radiance closure improved at higher levels in V2.1, but not evident in comparison with ACE

## MLS - GEOS-4

**MLS v2.1**

**MLS v1.5**

## MLS-CHAMP  Comparison

## TES Summary

- v002 TES T has a cold bias relative to  AIRS of -0.5 to -1.2 K at 100-600 hPa.
- Similar bias seen in comparisons to sondes, aircraft, and GEOS-4.
- Next release (v003) of TES will use CO2 spectroscopy to determine T.
- Future validation needs: TES limb temperature validation and high-latitude correlative measurements.

## TES (GS) vs AIRS

- Mean profiles
- TES - AIRS

- Bias in green [TES-AIRS],  rms differences in black

- TES warm bias 0.0 to +1.5 K at 20-100 hPa relative to AIRS.

- TES cold bias -0.5 to -1.2 K at 100-600 hPa relative to AIRS.

## Summary of Discussion

- Expect most comparisons to be included in instrument validation papers
- Comparisons of “validation” datasets would be useful - value of an atlas?
- Availability of additional datasets (e.g., COSMIC) should be examined
- Quality of meteorological analyses needs documenting
- Will follow up with email, possibly phone conferences, to ensure progress
# Presentation: 871745

## •

- DRIVER BOX INPUT

- D1

- D2

- D3

- R1

- R2

- IIB HOME

- IIB GND

- IIB +5V

- IIB home inputs
- are in parallel

- 1553 RM GND     DIG OUT

-         ( 2 - WIRE  CONNECTOR )

- DRIVER BOX GND

- EMERGENCY

- SWITCH

- DRIVER

- SWITCH

-       HOT LINES

- BNC  CONNECTORS

- BNC  CONNECTOR

- 1-1

- 1-4

## FPD Roman Pot movement control adapter circuit schematic

- DRIVER BOX

- D1

- D3

- R1

- R2

- HOME IN

- GND

- +5V

- Emergency

- drivers

- D2

- Blower Sense

- SWITCHES + HOT LINES       POWER CONTROL ADAPTER            INDEX INTERFACES

- 1553 RM

- input 1

- input 2 (opt.isol.)

- GND

- DO1

- POWER BOX

- input

- DO2

- GND

- RMI

- Fault Output

- Enable Blower

- Smoke Det.

- Smoke Sense

- DO2

- GND

- 1553
- LINE

- FIRUS Output

- GND

- NC

- NO

- CN3(1)

- CN3(4)

- POWER SUPPLY

- PARALLEL

- line

-  control line

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- pmca

- pmca

- power box

- driver box

- driver box

- power box

- power box

- driver box

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- power box

- driver box

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- IIB

- d box

- p box

- P1

- P2

- A1

- A2

- D

- pmca

- pmca

- pmca

- Emerg

- PMC

- switch

- switch

**FPD Roman Pot movement control adapter circuit schematic**

**FPD Roman Pot movement control general  schematic**

## •

- SIGN

-  GND

- SIGN
- GND

- 70 OHM FLAT RIBBON CABLE

-  50 COAXIAL CABLE

- SIGNAL PROPAGATION

- 22  1/4W 10%

- 175  1/4W 10%

- How to match impedances of LMR400 and flat ribbon cables

- - 15V

-  GND

- +5V
- GND

- 10k
- 1/4W

- 5k
- 1/4W

- +15V

-  GND

- 10k
- 1/4W 10%

- 5k
- 1/4W 10%

- - 10V

-  GND

- 10k
- 1/4W

- 5k
- 1/4W

- +10V

-  GND

- 10k
- 1/4W 10%

- 5k
- 1/4W 10%

- Voltage dividers from the
- FPD low voltage power
- supplies to the 1553 RM
- interface analog inputs

- 1553 RM interface
- analog inputs

- Voltage dividers to monitor low voltage power supplies
- with 1553 Rack Monitor analog inputs ( 5 inputs required)
# Presentation: 862128

## A global data/background comparison

- Bruce Knuteson
- University of Chicago

**Generate all SM processes**
**Run through simulation / misID matrix**
**Partition data/background into exclusive final states**
**Perform a systematic comparison**

**“****Industrial strength”**

**Exotics****	****13 June 2002**

## Generate all SM processes

**PYTHIA**
- 	jj, W, Z, j, [, WW, WZ, tt]
**MADGRAPH**
- 	e+ve, e+ve j, e+ve jj, e+ve bb jj, . . . .

- (Only need  100k events)

## 2.  Run through simulation / misID matrix

**PGS**
- 	fast detector simulation (Conway)
**cdfSim**
- 	detailed detector simulation
**misID**

|  | e |  |  |  | j | b |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| e | .65 |  |  | .05 |  |  |
|  |  | .39 |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |
|  |  |  |  | .65 |  |  |
| j | 4e-5 |  |  |  | 1 |  |
| b |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |

- true

- reconstructed

## e  μ      j  b  ET

- Make use of “standard” particle ID
- [Reasonably tight, but not overly tight]

- e  μ  ****  ****  j  b  ET

## 4.  Perform a systematic comparison

- 1mu-1pmiss	[86] 	0 	1639 	1582.8 +- 74.6
- 						( w = 1473.4 , z = 109.4 )
- 1e-1pmiss2j 	[50] 	0 	126 	108.5 +- 24.9
- 						( jj = 1.6 , w = 105.2 , ww = 1.7 )
- 1mu-2j 		[-] 	0 	11 	15.2 +- 7
- 						( jj = 4.2 , z = 10.9 )
- 1mu-1pmiss2j 	[-] 	0 	16 	12.2 +- 6.2
- 						( w = 10.5 , ww = 1 , wz = 0.7 )
- 1mu-4j 		[-] 	0 	1 	1.4 +- 1
- 						( tt = 1.4 )
- 1e+1e- 		[3] 	0 	388 	406.7 +- 40.1
- 						( z = 406.7 )
- 1e+1e-1j 	[-] 	0 	62 	55.6 +- 14.8
- 						( z = 55.3 , zz = 0.3 )

- Wed Jun 5 16:12:49 CDT 2002
- With 517 distributions considered in 111 final states in 31.14pb^-1, Dissimilarities follow:
- Final state 	ps		data 	bkg

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Conclusions

**. . . a different (and perhaps profitable) way of tackling data in Run II**

- http://hep.uchicago.edu/~knuteson/tmp1_real/
# Presentation: 362654

## Thoughts on p14 and RECO

-  Tracking
-  HTF has shown that loosening “miss” requirements improves efficiency
-  AA is improving efficiency without significant increase in fakes
-  GTR may have improved SMT forward tracking
-  Calorimeter threshold chosen (CTF recommendation due)
-  Changes to weights?
-  Changes to structure (more than one threshold)?
-  Better alignment?
-  Regular use of calibration db’s
-  Will try to test / migrate using p13
-  Regular improvements in object id / algo groups (they just do “their thing”...)
-  They are currently focused on p13.

**What I know about...**

- If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average.
- -- M. H. Alderson

## I know p14 comes after p13, but ...

-  Improve RECO memory usage
-  Trying to apply purify/ensure
-  Improve RECO speed
-  One simple change – reduce number of jet algorithms, as per previous agreement
-  Clean up / understand error messages
-  Currently dominated by real errors with raw data – maybe we can help get things fixed?
-  New functionality?
-  Vertexing with “objects”
-  Better photon id
-  Clean up B id ?
-  presumably a lot more.

- Patience is the companion of wisdom.
- -- Saint Augustine

## p13 status – not done yet (but really close)...

-  p13.03.00 – this week
-  fix crashes on farms
-  support p13 MC
-  p13.04.00 – next week
-  several minor improvements
-  formally not compatible with p13.02.00, but quite close
-  muon duplicates
-  thumbnail quantities
-  adopt to aligned calorimeter for semreco
-  ...

- Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.
- -- Bill Gates
# Presentation: 915448

## Moore: Status and Plans

**The Moore Group**
- ATLAS Muon Week, CERN
- 28 August 2001

## Pattern Recognition: Track Finding

- x, y plane

- z, y plane

- Inner station

- Outer station

- Middle station

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001

## Efficiency

- Efficiency (%)

- PT (GeV)

- Muonbox
- MOORE

**Efficiency plots for P****T**** at **
**6**, **20, 100,  300, 1000 GeV**

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001

## Efficiency

- Efficiency (%)

- φ (radians)

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001

## Resolution

- PT-resolution (%)

- PT (Gev)

**Resolution plots for P****T**** at 6**, **20, 100,  300, 1000 GeV**

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001

## Pull of 1/PT

- PT = 1000 Gev

- PT = 6 Gev

- σ =  1.1941

- σ = 6.176

- The error on 1\PT pull is due to the material

-  pull = difference between the reconstructed and true values normalised to the error  on the reconstructed value.

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001

## Plans

- Release the code documented.
- Need Magnetic Field service in Athena
- Look into using the Level-1 simulation code directly.
- Need to get the material description
- Need SKIP/PICK in Athena jobOptions
- To debug special events that cause failures.
- Still plan to use Cobra fitting
- Exploring Graphics with Atlantis and continue with GraXML

- The Moore Group                                         ATLAS Muon Week

- CERN, 28 August 2001
# Presentation: 006462

## eTariff Public Viewer

- (eTariff Search Page)

## eTariff Public Viewer

- First page displayed to user:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- User can search using several different criteria (Search By):

## eTariff Public Viewer

- User enters what they are searching for (Search For) and clicks Submit button:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- Matching records are displayed in a grid.  Link to Tariff is shown at right:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- User clicked “View” link to display PDF of the selected Tariff:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- User can then search thru Tariff for text or phrases using Acrobat Reader:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- Results of PDF text search are displayed for the User:

## eTariff Public Viewer

- Proposed enhancements:
- Perform text searches within a specific tariff program.
- Perform text searches across several or all tariff programs.
- Perform text searches by tariff or section status.
# Presentation: 409460

## MEASURED VARIABLES

_**EDDY COVARIANCE**_** system :  ****(Gill anemometer, licor 6262, flow 9 lm-1, tube length 10 m, diameter 4 mm)**
**Fc, H, LE, air temperature, wind direction, ...**
_**METEREOLOGICAL SENSORS**_**: **
**net radiation, soil heat flux, atmospheric pressure,  precipitation, PPFD, air temperature profile, soil temperature profile, soil water content**
_**OTHER MEASUREMENTS**_**:**
**soil respiration, soil CO2 production**
**L.A.I.**
**biomass growth **
**litter production, decomposition**
**sapflow**
**fine roots growth, turnover,**
**physiological  parameters (photosynthesis, leaf and stem respiration)**
**chamber comparison**

**large and replicated OTC enclosing a representative portion of the ecosystem**
**measurements  made simultaneously**
**OTC and eddy station sited in the same stand**

## Slide 2

## techniques/measurements DIFFERENCES  

**stand: biomass, LAI, species composition**
**space scale: ****	****	****fix/variable footprint**
**	****	****single measurement/replicates**
**time scale:****	**** ****	**** continuous/limited**

## Carbon balance April-September 00

**Light response**

**Temperature response**
# Presentation: 713397

## Marketing Claims and Verification Process

- Craig A. Morris, Deputy Administrator

- Livestock and Seed Program
- Agricultural Marketing Service

## Developing Marketing Claims

- Value-added marketing opportunities

## Marketing Claim Standards

- Driven by consumer demand

- Created to differentiate value of commodities
- Single standard with explicit attributes to create common language among industry
- Distinguishes products in the marketplace

## Marketing Claim Standards

- Applies to unique livestock production or processing activities.
- E.g., Naturally raised, Grass (forage) fed

- Marketed at retail
- Voluntary
- But if applying the standard, mandatory to receive USDA certification

## Role of Agricultural Marketing Service

- Indentify need
- Request input from stakeholders
- Propose in Federal Register—public comment
- Analyze comments
- Publish final marketing claim

## Certifying Validity of Marketing Claims

- Independent verification by the
- Agricultural Marketing Service

## Process Verified Program 

- Process Verified Program

- AMS performs independent audits and accreditations
- ISO 9001:2000 standard
- ISO Guide 65 Program
- E.g., U.S. Organic Certifiers for EU

## Process Verified Program 

- Distinguishes specific activities throughout production process
- Animal trace back and identification
- User fees—cost recovery

## Questions?

- Contact the Livestock and Seed Program
- Verification and Certification: (540) 361-7640
- Standards: (202) 720-4486
- _[www.ams.usda.gov/lsprogram](http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsprogram)_
- Contact Poultry Programs
- Verification and Certification: (202) 720-4411
- Standards: (202) 690-3148
- _[www.ams.usda.gov](http://www.ams.usda.gov/poultry)__[/poultry](http://www.ams.usda.gov/poultry)_