BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 520192

## Aka Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management Software Applications

**Aka Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management Software Applications**

- Ron Kelly (DoD CIO/IP Directorate)
- (703) 602-1007
- ronald.kelly@osd.mil
- March 20, 2007

**Department of Defense**
**5015.2 - Standard**

## Background

**STD Not to be confused with separate DoDD 5015.2**
**1997  --  Set of Baseline Functional Requirements**
**2001  --  Added Classified Records Metadata**
**2002  --  Version 2 Last Published**
**2007  --  Draft Version 3 Added FOIA/Privacy Act and Basic Interoperability**

## What’s New in this Version 3?

**FOIA/Privacy Act**
- Additional Metadata, including email
- Work flow, Alerts, and Response Timing Requirements
- Builds on Automatic Linking, User Defined Fields and Logic from Ver 2
**Interoperability:  Requires Tools to Support -**
- Data Discovery Standards, including email
- NARA Record Archival Export Standards
- Import/Export Standards for Moving Records among Compliant Electronic Recordkeeping Systems (EKMS)
- Encourages Solutions Such as SOA

## From JITC: Of Note to Vendors

- Analyze new version completely
- Stay engaged
- Scripts are important
- Test cases are artificial scenarios
- JITC contracting process will change:
- 3 Year Contract (1 yr coord; 2 yrs compliance)
- Baseline fee $30K; travel is additional
- Fee paid incrementally; $1000 to start
- Must have signed contract to start test coordination

## Latest Status on Standard

- Comments adjudication is complete
- Staffing for ASD signature
- After signature, will be posted to internet at:
- _[http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/](http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/)_
- Click on Publications
- Scroll down to 5015.2-STD
- Next, will begin a revision of the basic directive, DoDD 5015.2

## Contact Info

**Contact Info**

**DoD CIO: Ron Kelly**
- 703-602-1007      _[ronald.kelly@osd.mil](mailto:ronald.kelly@osd.mil)_
- Information Policy Directorate
- Suite 600
- 1851 S Bell Street
- Arlington, VA 22202
**JITC POC: Ms Jana Gallatin**
- j_[ana.gallatin@disa.mil](mailto:Jana.gallatin@disa.mil)_
- URL: http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/
# Presentation: 432842

## Account Managers’ Briefing - MU Mail Topics 

**Important Dates**
**Selection**
**Package Contents**
**Features**
**Variable Imprinting**
**Follow-ups**
**B.J Fitzpatrick  (x2604)**

- 3/13/02

## MU Important Dates 

**6/26 - Information obtained from advance ****	****mailing is posted in batch to 2001 SSEL**
**6/30 - 2001 COS/ASM closeout in NPC **
**7/29 - Last interactive update to 2001     ****	****	****register that will be reflected in mailing.**
** ****9/9 - 2002 Production Register established ****	****from 2001 SSEL, begin migrating special ****	****handling information**
**10/1 - Start printing in NPC**
**12/1 - Reprints**
**12/9 - Mailout**

- 3/13/02

## MU Mail - Selection 

**Selection will occur on the flow (Oct - Nov)**
**Select all active companies (except totally Agriculture)**
**Select all active establishments**
**Create Form 99001**
**Assign out-of-scope establishments**
**Create Alternate Reporting Units (ARU)**
**Assign select FIRE, Utility, Information, and Minerals establishments**
**Assign form numbers**** ****to other establishments**
** ****PDIV/NAICS**

- 3/13/02

## MU Mailout - Package Contents

**1. Label for addressing boxes (where needed)**
**2. Cover Letter (used for addressing small or      ****	****	****  medium size companies)**
**3. Inventory List**
**4. Report Forms**
**NC 99001 (if applicable)**
**ARUs (if applicable)**
**Other addressed report forms (in desired sequence)**
**Unaddressed report forms (for reporting adds) if applicable**
**5. Instructions/Flyers**

- 3/13/02

## MU Mail Program Features

**DocuPrint - print entire company in a single package**
**Flow Selection - Start in October, end in December**
**Reprint for late corrections**
**Special handling features **
**Suppress company**
**Split companies into mailing packages**
**Suppress form 99001 **
**Electronic reporting media **
**Special sequencing  **
**Certified mailing**

- 3/13/02

## MU Mail - Variable Imprinting 

**Address Labels**
**Account manager information on cover letter**
**Inventory list**
**List establishments on 99001 and ARUs**
**Prior year data (ASM)**
**CFN on all sheets**
**Assign instructions and flyers per forms in package**
**Assign additional (blank) forms (to report adds)**

- 3/13/02

## MU Follow Up

**L & M Companies**
**Totally Delinquent **
** ****no extension - 4 letter, 3 telephone**
**with extension - 1 letter, 1 telephone**
**Partially Delinquent**
**no extension - 2 letter/listing, 2 telephone**
**with extension - 1 letter/listing, 1 telephone**
**N & S Companies**
**Totally Delinquent**
**no extension - 3 letter, 1 form**
**with extension - 1 letter**
**Partially Delinquent**
**no extension - 2 letter/listing**
**with extension - 1 letter/listing**

- 3/13/02
# Presentation: 100779

## Improving Public Understanding of Arctic Climate Variations via the Web

- Nancy N. Soreide, James E. Overland, NOAA/PMEL
- John Calder, NOAA/Arctic  Research Office

- American Meteorological Society / IIPS February 9-13, 2003, Long Beach, CA

## The Arctic

- Change in the Arctic may play a substantial role in climate change throughout the globe.
-  Global change, particularly climate change may have its most pronounced effects in the Arctic

## Complex changes are occurring in the Arctic

- Permafrost temperatures are rising
- Shrubs starting to appear
- Sea ice volume is decreasing
- Stratospheric winds are increasing
- Northern Europe is warming (winter)
- Northern N. America is warming (spring)
- Ecosystem shifts impacting fisheries, land, marine mammals

## Communicating Arctic change information

- The Arctic Theme Page
- A Comprehensive Resource
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## Photographs
Maps
Animals
Ships
Northern Lights
Exploration

- Maps
- Animals
- Ships
- Northern Lights
- Exploration

- Educational links
- Lesson Plans
- Environment
- Pollution
- Archaeology
- Native Peoples

- Comprehensive Educational Resource

- The Arctic Theme Page
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## Comprehensive Educational Resource

- The Arctic Theme Page
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## Data and Forecasts

- Real-time data
- Latest forecasts
- Historical Data
- Data Centers
- Research Programs
- Research Institutions

- The Arctic Theme Page
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## Expert Essays on key Arctic issues

- How do scientists study climate change? *Nick Bond*
- Are environmental changes impacting Alaska Natives? Caleb Pungowiyi
- UVB radiation:  Threat to the Arctic?  *Betsy Weatherhead*
- How does Arctic sea ice form and decay? *Peter Wadhams*
- How has sea ice volume changed? *Norbert Untersteiner*
- Is sea level affected by changes in Arctic land ice? *Roger Barry*
- What long term trends are seen in the Artic atmosphere? *John Walsh*
- Is mercury a significant contaminant? *Steve Lindberg/Steve Brooks*
- What organisms thrive in Arctic sea ice? *Christopher Krebs/Jody Deming*
- Is there life on the Arctic sea floor? *Peter Vogt*
- Arctic Wolves and their prey *David Mech*
- What’s happening to Polar Bears? Scott Schliebe

- The Arctic Theme Page
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## One Stop Shopping for Arctic Data from many scientific disciplines

- Climate Indices
- Atmosphere
- Ocean
- Sea Ice
- Terrestrial
- Biology
- Fisheries

- Unaami Data Collection
- http://www.arctic.noaa.gov

## Scientific Analyses

## Scientific Analyses Distilled for Decision Makers

- Large changes in
- recent years across
- multiple disciplines
- and analyses are
- highlighted in red.

## Improving Public Understanding of Arctic Climate Variations via the Web

- of the methodology without sacrificing recognition of the
- underlying complexity of the ecosystem.

*Comprehensive information resource*
*Real-time and historical data*
*Real-time forecasts*
*Analyses and scientific journal articles*
*Analyses distilled into presentations for decision makers*
# Presentation: 875161

## GFAL info system queries (1/2)

- Get SE type of _host_ (obsolete)
- (GlueSEUniqueID=_host_)
- GlueSEName (“siteName:type”)
- Get SE endpoint for _host_
- (&(GlueServiceURI=*_host_*)(GlueServiceType=srm_v1))
- GlueServiceURI
- Get SE port for _host_
- (GlueSEUniqueID=_host_)
- GlueSEPort
- Get SA Root for _VO_ on _host_ (obsolete)
- (&(GlueSARoot=_VO_:*)(GlueChunkKey=GlueSEUniqueID=_host_))
- GlueSARoot

## GFAL info system queries (2/2)

- Get SA Path for _VO_ on _host_
- (&(GlueSALocalID=_VO_)(GlueChunkKey=GlueSEUniqueID=_host_))
- GlueSAPath, GlueSARoot
- Get SE access protocols for _host_
- (&(GlueSEAccessProtocolType=*)(GlueChunkKey=GlueSEUniqueID=_host_))
- GlueSEAccessProtocolPort, GlueSEAccessProtocolType
- Get CE access point for _host_ (for “file” protocol or “Classic SE”)
- (GlueCESEBindSEUniqueID=_host_)
- GlueCESEBindCEAccesspoint
# Presentation: 644345

## PAC and the Run IIb Upgrade-23 Jun 03

- The collider spokespersons and project managers met this morning with the Director and the Research Director.  We were given a verbal "preview" of the recommendations from the PAC concerning the  Run IIb upgrades.  The report will go into some detail but the basic recommendations appear to be:
- the non-silicon upgrades should go ahead
- the committee recommends that the director should take a  "measured decision on a timescale of the next few months" concerning the silicon detectors.  The factors to be weighed will be
-  a) the probability that the accelerator meets or exceeds its design luminosity
-  b) the life expectancy of the Run IIa detectors
- c) the b-tagging efficiency as a function of radiation damage
- d) the ability to usefully redirect any of the resources that would be freed up by cancelling the silicon
- While the above sounds reasonably neutral, we also understand that the majority of the PAC "finds the case for the silicon upgrades to be weak".   The key issue is the accelerator performance, (a) above.
- Clearly this is not a particularly good outcome.  We remain committed to the upgrade projects and we are considering how to respond to this new situation.  Please contact any of us if you want to know more, if you have comments, or if you have suggestions on how we should react.
- 							John, Jerry and Jon

## Director’s Comments

-  **Date:** 25-JUN-2003 14:48
- To: Fermilab staff
- From: Michael Witherell
- Concerning: Run II
-  I am writing to give you some information about Run II at the Tevatron. For the success of the physics program of the CDF and DZero experiments at the Tevatron, and for the future of our laboratory, it is critical that we deliver as many particle collisions as possible to the detectors in the months and years ahead. I want to keep you informed of where we are and where we are going in this all-important effort.
- Earlier this month, Fermilab completed a Luminosity Upgrade Plan for Run II through mid-2009, to maximize the total number of particle collisions and the scientific potential of Run II. You can find the plan on the web at _[http://www.](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[fnal](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[.](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[gov](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[/pub/now/](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[upgradeplan](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)__[/](http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/upgradeplan/)_ The Upgrade Plan will be reviewed on July 21-23 by a Department of Energy Panel led by Dan Lehman. I will share the results of that review with you as soon as they are available.
- An article in the June 27 issue of FermiNews, appearing on Friday, will give my view of Run II's current status and future prospects. I hope you will take a few minutes to read it. I have tried to present the issues we are facing and to outline some upcoming changes that will help us work better together as a laboratory for the success of Run II.
# Presentation: 106478

## New Data on Breastfeeding

- From the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth

- Anjani Chandra, Ph.D.
- Statistician/Demographer
- National Center for Health Statistics
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

## Data Source – National Survey of Family Growth

- Periodically conducted household-based survey
- Multi-purpose:  Factors related to fertility and reproductive health
- Nationally representative of women 15-44 years
- 6 cycles to date, all conducted by NCHS – 1973, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1995, 2002

## Breastfeeding Data in the National Survey of Family Growth

- Initiation – “ever breastfed”
- Age of child when first fed something other than breastmilk
- Rough indicator of “exclusive breastfeeding”
- “Exclusive breastfeeding” includes bottlefeeding of breastmilk
- Age of child when stopped breastfeeding altogether
- 1995 NSFG also asked reasons why woman did NOT breastfeed and reasons why she stopped when she did

## Percent ever breastfed

- Source:   CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

- Age at delivery

- Union status at delivery

## Percent ever breastfed

- Income shows same pattern as education

- Intendedness at conception

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Percent ever breastfed

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Breastfeeding by Hispanic origin & race(percent still breastfeeding at selected months)

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Breastfeeding by Hispanic origin & race(percent distribution by duration)

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Percent ever breastfed, single births 1990-93 and 1997-2000

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – NSFG Cycles 5 & 6

## Breastfeeding by Hispanic origin & race(percent still breastfeeding at selected months)

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Percent exclusively fed breastmilk for at least 3 or 6 months

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Percent still breastfeeding at 6 & 12 months among 3-month exclusive breastfeeders 

- Source:  CDC/NCHS – 2002 NSFG, single births 1997-2000

## Breastfeeding data compared

|  | 2002 NSFG | 2002 NIS | 2001 RLMS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ever breastfed | 69% | 71% | 69% |
| At 3 months | 48% | 52% | n/a |
| At 6 months | 35% | 35% | 33% |
| At 12 months | 17% | 16% | n/a |
|  |  |  |  |
| Exclusive 3 months | 36% | 43% | n/a |
| Exclusive 6 months | 11% | 13% | 17% |

- No differences are statistically significant between surveys.

## Other data sources on breastfeeding

- NATIONAL:
- 2002 National Immunization Survey
- National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
- Ross Labs Mothers Survey (RLMS)
- STATE-LEVEL:
- PRAMS
# Presentation: 056442

## Fetal and Neonatal Effects of Inhalant Abuse

- Milton Tenenbein, MD
- University of Manitoba
- Inhalant Abuse Among Children and Adolescents
- Consultation on Building an International Research Agenda
- Washington, DC  November 7-9, 2005

## Topics

- Neonatal Acidosis
- Neonatal Withdrawal
- “Fetal Solvent Syndrome”

## Neonatal Acidosis

## Metabolic Acidosis

- a complication of inhalant abuse
- mechanism unclear
- renal tubular acidosis?
- increased organic acid load?

## Neonatal Metabolic Acidosis

- literature: brief mention of 3 cases
- Winnipeg experience
- 22/36 newborns
- 15 transient
- 7 persistent

## Conclusions

- neonatal metabolic acidosis occurs
- severity is variable
- likely related to degree of exposure immediately prior to birth

## Neonatal Withdrawal

## Purpose

- To describe . . .
- neonatal withdrawal from inhalants
- its gradation by clinical scoring
- its treatment with phenobarbital

## Methods

- 4 year study
- included: all offspring of inhalant abusing mothers
- excluded: neonates with major illness
- 			  polysubstance abuse (except alcohol)
- Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System
- pharmacotherapy:  phenobarbital
- odor of inhalant abuse:  retrospective review

## Results

## Clinical Features

- Fulfilled Criteria for
- Pharmacotherapy			_Yes_		_No_
- 	Number				32		16
- 	weight (kg) mean			2.9		2.8
- 			  range		2.0-4.1	1.8-4.2
- 	Gender:      M			20		9
- 			  F			12		7
- 	Chemical Odor:
- 			  Baby			8		0
- 			  Mother		15		6

##  Features of Neonatal Inhalant Withdrawal

- excessive and high pitched cry
- sleeplessness
- tremors
- hypertonia
- poor feeding

## Pharmacotherapy

- Number of Newborns			28
- Age at Onset of Therapy		27.1 hr
- Duration of Therapy (n=27)*	5.8 days
- Efficacy of Therapy  (n=27)*
- 	yes						17
- 	no						7
- 	borderline				3
- 		   * one received a loading dose                          	      but no maintenance therapy

## Conclusions

- Neonatal withdrawal from inhalants occurs
- Finnegan scoring is useful for its gradation
- Inhalant odor in baby or mother is a marker
- Phenobarbital therapy seems to be worthwhile

## “Fetal Solvent Syndrome”

## Background

- several descriptive reports suggest the existence of the “Fetal Solvent Syndrome”
- the phenotype is virtually identical to the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome

## Purpose

- to test whether exposure to inhalants during pregnancy produces infants with the “Fetal Solvent Syndrome”

## Methods

- case control design
- cases (3-6 years old)
- 12 infants exposed to inhalants only
- 15 infants exposed to inhalants + alcohol
- controls
- 27 age and gender matched infants
- blinded dysmorphologist

## Results

- 10/27 were similar to FAS
- all 10 were exposed to inhalants + alcohol
- no FAS in the 12 inhalants only group

## Conclusions 

-    Our data do not support the existence of a fetal solvent syndrome physical phenotype.  The observed dysmorphic features is likely attributable to alcohol exposure in utero.

## Conclusions

- Neonatal acidosis occurs
- Neonatal withdrawal occurs
- “Fetal Solvent Syndrome” is not supported
# Presentation: 522810

## We have studied the transformation kinetics of ferroelectric domains in epitaxial thin film of barium titanate. The kinetics are determined from the temporal response of the electro-optic effect.
 The kinetics are best described by a stretched exponential in time and is attributed to the poling and  polarization reversal of nano-domains.The average time for polarization reversal, < τ >, is a function of applied electric field E and is proportional to exponential of the ratio of activation field α over applied electric field E. 

-  The kinetics are best described by a stretched exponential in time and is attributed to the poling and  polarization reversal of nano-domains.The average time for polarization reversal, < τ >, is a function of applied electric field E and is proportional to exponential of the ratio of activation field α over applied electric field E.

**Dynamic Response of Epitaxial Ferroelectric Thin Films****Bruce Wessels, Northwestern University, DMR 0605292**

- A typical cycle of excitation and relaxation of electro-optic  response of a barium titanate thin film. A 10 ms mono-polar 34.8 V (Vp-p) pulse is applied to the sample.

- Orientation of ferroelectric domains. The orientation changes upon application of a bias pulse.

## 
We have been developing an apparatus to study fast transformation kinetics in thin film materials.
 The technique is based on measurement of the time dependence of the optical Pockels effect which is sensitive to material structure. The apparatus will ultimately be capable of measuring transformation kinetics on the picosecond time scale.
 A general kinetic model for driven systems is under development.

- We have been developing an apparatus to study fast transformation kinetics in thin film materials.
-  The technique is based on measurement of the time dependence of the optical Pockels effect which is sensitive to material structure. The apparatus will ultimately be capable of measuring transformation kinetics on the picosecond time scale.
-  A general kinetic model for driven systems is under development.

**Dynamic Response of Epitaxial Ferroelectric Thin Films****Bruce Wessels, Northwestern University, DMR 0605292**

- Apparatus for measurement of the linear electro-optic effect. Changes in the optical birefringence upon application of a voltage bias is measured as a function of time and temperature.
# Presentation: 009852

## NOAA IPv6 Implementation Plan Status Briefing

- John Unekis, Chief
- Enterprise Networking Services Division
- IT Operations Office
- 2/6/07

## Discussion Points

- Background
- Status of NOAA IPv6 Implementation Plan
- Implementation Elements
- Considerations
- Moving Forward

## Background

- OMB Memorandum 05-22
- Aug 2005.  June 08 agencies transition to v6
- Compliance:  Backbone networks must be v6 ‘*capable’*
- NOAA AOP Milestone
- Implementation plan was due end of Q4 06
- Committed to *really* finish it by end of Q2 07  (10/06 NAC)
- Recent Events
- Transferred our /32 address block to DoC on conditions that:
- A contiguous /35 block is reserved for NOAA
- NOAA will internally manage the address space at its discretion

## Status of NOAA IPv6 Implementation Plan

- NAC IPv6 subgroup established on April 6, 2006
- Initial Q4 milestone missed ... current Q2 milestone at risk
- Document is approximately 5% complete
- Previously briefed @ 20% but scope now better understood
- Insufficient additional resources are being expended
- Project coordination via dotProject is unpopulated
- Increased focus is needed
- Suggest a ‘Task Force’ posture ... bring team together!
- Revised plan completion target: March 30, 2007
- Some GOOD news:  Revised OMB guidance is *softening* in face of realization of cost, difficulty.

## Implementation Elements

**Introduction**
- Background, Objectives, Contributors
**Scope**
- Criteria, Inventories, Standards and products
**Network Addressing**
- Obtaining Address Space, Service Providers, Mobility Support, Routing, Configuration Management, Domain Name Services
**Information Security**
- Firewalls, Intrusion Detection and Prevention, Network Management, Encryption, tunneling, and VPN
**Transition Mechanisms**
-   Requirements, Interoperability with IPv4, Dual-stacks, Tunneling protocols
**Testing**
-  Vendor support, Pilot projects, Other internal testing
**Training**
-   Awareness,  Architectural and design,  Operational,  Specialized
**Conclusion and Summary**

## Considerations

- Scope with respect to the FY08 mandate
- Balance of ‘capable’ and ‘enabled’
- Establish a NOAA presence on the IPv6 Internet
- Demonstrates good faith intent to use ARIN address block
- IPv6 services from NOAAnet carrier
- Will native service be available in a realistic timeframe?
- NWS/NOAAnet engineering has limited resources
- Security Implications
- NCIRT has limited time and resources
- How will IPv6 change our C&A posture?

## Moving Forward

- Coordinate with DoC IPv6 project team
- Coordinate with NOAAnet project team
- NCIRT to specify core security infrastructure
- Survey available IPv6 transit services
- Estimate costs for June ’08 compliance

## Questions?
# Presentation: 172066

## HEBT, Ring, and RTBT Carbon Wire ScannersPreliminary Design Review

- System Overview
- Peter Cameron
- July 23, 2002

## Outline

- AP Requirements
- HEBT, Ring, and RTBT Layouts
- WS Status July 2002
- Responsibilities
- Installation

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## AP Requirements for Wire Scanners

- Don’t melt the wire!
- Intensity
- HEBT 5e10 - 2e11
- Ring 5e10 - 2e14
- RTBT 2e12 - 2e14
- Range +/- pipe radius
- Accuracy 10% rms width
- Resolution 5% rms width
- Data Structure - limited by 40KHz hipass in AFE
- Detector
- HEBT SEM
- Ring and RTBT SEM plus fast BLM

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## HEBT Instrumentation

| Type | BNL | LANL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BPM PUE 12cm | 31 | 0 |
| BPM PUE 21cm | 4 | 0 |
| BPM PUE 30cm | 1 | 0 |
| BPM Electronics | 0 | 36 |
| Phase - BPM TOF | 0 | 2 |
| BLM | 52 | 0 |
| FBLM | 3 | 0 |
| BCM | 5 | 0 |
| WS | 0 | 11 |
| Foil Video | 2 | 0 |
| Harp | 0 | 2 |

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## Ring Instrumentation

| Type | Qty | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BPM (2 shared with RF) | 44 | 28 ea 21cm, 8 ea 26cm, 8 ea 30cm |
| IPM | 2 | H + V |
| BLM | 75 | Ion chamber |
| FBLM | 12 | PMT |
| Beam Current | 2 | BCM, WCM(RF) |
| Coh tune | 1 | Kicker + PU |
| Incoh tune | 2? | BTF, QMM |
| WS (LANL) | 1 | H + V + 45 deg |
| Beam-in-Gap | 1 | Kicker + PMT |
| E detector | 5 |  |
| Octupole | 1 |  |

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## RTBT Instrumentation

| Type | BNL | LANL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BPM 21cm | 15 | 0 |
| BPM 36cm | 2 | 0 |
| BLM | 40 | 0 |
| FBLM | 3 | 0 |
| BCM | 5 | 0 |
| WS | 0 | 5 |
| Harp | 0 | 2 |

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## Status as of July 2002

- MEBT Wire Scanner actuators (5 plus 1 spare) completed at BNL and delivered to LBNL for MEBT commissioning
- MEBT Wire Scanner motion control, DAQ, and GUI completed at LANL and delivered to LBNL for MEBT commissioning
- Letter of Intent written to transfer responsibilities and funds for HEBT, Ring, and RTBT wire scanners from BNL to LANL. LANL is writing PCR
- Understanding is that some fraction of HEBT wires may be replaced with Laser Wires.

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## Responsibilities

- Vacuum Chambers – BNL
- All the rest – LANL

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## Scanner/Beam Box Assembly

**Flange/tubing** **Size:**
-     6.75”/5”OD (HEBT)
-    10”/8”OD (Ring, RTBT)
**Crane hook height: **
-   50”** **from center of the beam

- BNL Diagnostics Review

## Tunnel Clearances

|  | HEBT 
(w/t 5” dia. tubing) | RING/RTBT 
(w/t 8”dia. tubing)  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Huntington feethru | 30.8”
 | 32.8”
 |
| Fork Assy |               12” |              20”  |
| 1⁄2  beam pipe |   2.5”
 |                4”  |
| Total length from
Center of the beam  | 45.3”
 | 56.8”
 |
| Height if inclined 45o |      32” (OK, < 50”)
 |    40.1” (OK, < 50”)
 |

**Check the lengths of LANL Wire Scanners against                the Space Restriction**

- BNL Diagnostics Review
# Presentation: 016395

## OSHA Challenge Pilot Program StatisticsAs of November 30, 2008

## Participation

**186 Participants**
**97 Construction**
**89 General Industry**
**23 Graduates [Completed Stage 3]**
**19 Construction**
**4 General Industry**
**10 Achieved VPP Recognition**
**8 Construction**
**2 General Industry**
**	****	**

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

**Notes:**
Confirmed Participant+  complete package received and acceptance letter sent. 

## Participation

**26 Administrators**
**14 Construction; 12 General Industry**
**114 Coordinators**
**	****75 Construction; 39 General Industry**

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 4

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 5

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 6

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 7

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 8

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Employment

**86,977 Current Employees Impacted**
**Construction: 20,933; General Industry: 66,044**
**76,250 Site Employees**
**Construction: 18,579; General Industry: 57,671**
**10,727 Contract Employees**
**Construction: 2,354; General Industry: 8,373**** **
**96,572 Total Employees Impacted**
**Construction: 28,287; General Industry: 68,285**
**85,566 Site Employees**
**Construction: 25,746; General Industry: 59,820**
**11,006 Contract Employees**
**Construction: 2,541; General Industry: 8,465**

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Slide 10

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Total Participants:

_**Total Participants:**_
**42% Unionized (79/186)**
_**Construction:**_
**25% Unionized (24/97)**
_**General Industry:**_
**62% Unionized (55/89)**

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Average Participant TCIR vs.  BLS TCIR Averages**Based on Phase II Evaluation (August 1, 2005 – December 31, 2006)

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Average Participant TCIR vs.  BLS DART Averages**Based on Phase II Evaluation (August 1, 2005 – December 31, 2006)

**Average Participant TCIR vs.  BLS DART** **Averages******Based on Phase II Evaluation (August 1, 2005 – December 31, 2006)**

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008

## Average TCIR and DART Rate Baseline Comparison*Based on Phase II Evaluation (August 1, 2005 – December 31, 2006)

|   | Total |  | CONSTRUCTION |  | GENERAL INDUSTRY |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   | TCIR | DART | TCIR | DART | TCIR | DART |
| Baseline Year | 6.41 | 3.71 | 7.03 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 3.86 |
| Final/Current Year | 5.89 | 3.5 | 6.71 | 3.61 | 4.82 | 3.37 |
| Percent Change | -8.87% | -5.89% | -4.79% | 0.30% | -16.30% | -14.50% |

- Source: Office of Partnerships and Recognition

- As of December 31, 2008
# Presentation: 316695

## David B. Johnson
Rice University
Departments of CS and ECE
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~dbj/
dbj@cs.rice.edu

- Rice University
- Departments of CS and ECE
**http://www.cs.rice.edu/~dbj/**
**dbj@cs.rice.edu**

**Seamless Integration Panel**

## What Architecture Can Provide It?

***Mobile IP*** allows transparent mobility between networks – or kinds of networks
- No support needed in greater Internet – or even in visited network

***(Mobile IPv6)***

## What Architecture Can Provide It?

***Ad hoc networking*** allows easy network formation – anytime, anywhere
- Can also provide coverage extension from existing infrastructure

## What Architecture Can Provide It?

***Overlay networking*** overlaps coverage areas of different types of networks
- Can combine short range fast, long range slow, expensive, etc.

- Ad hoc network

- Wireless PAN

- Wireless LAN

- Cellular
- Satellite
- High power licensed
- etc...

## Why Don’t We Have It?

***We ***_***do***_*** have it, at least in some form in research prototypes:***
- For example, I described our implementation of it yesterday
***But no commercial “killer application” yet:***
- Existing applications have not yet captured the imagination
- Mainstream customers not yet demanding seamless integration
- Software companies (e.g., Microsoft) need to be convinced to support it
***And commercial service providers only interested in their own network:***
- New wireless network providers worried about themselves:
- Example: New FCC auction winners need to make a profit now
- Example: New providers worried about deployment and own customers
- Supporting seamless integration may be seen as losing captive customers
- Historically telecom providers don’t understand computer/data networking
- Need to find a way to make a lot of money from seamless integration
# Presentation: 697086

## Improving Access to Mainstream Services for Families with Children Experiencing Homelessness

**Improving Access to Mainstream Services for Families with Children Experiencing** **Homelessness**

**John A. Wagner, Commissioner**
- MA Department of Transitional Assistance (Welfare)
- PA9 on Family Homelessness, Anaheim, CA
- “Plenary Session”
- November 2, 2005

## Background

**MA Department of Transitional Assistance = Food Stamps, TANF, cash assistance, homeless shelters**
- $35M for individuals
- $74M for families*
**Broken system for serving homeless families**
- Hotels at front door (lack of capacity)
- Little up-front case management or assessment
**Recent study found $253,899,019 spent annually across MA executive agencies to “manage” homelessness**
**Housing, education, social services, corrections, juvenile justice, vocational rehabilitation, mental health, public health, medical assistance, welfare, etc.**

## Implementation, Integration, and Systems Change:  3 Keys

- _Leadership_ from the Top
- Governor’s Executive Commission, Feb. 2003, providing research and common ground on issue, created executive-level workgroup
- MA Interagency Council, Jan. 2004
- Identifiable _Issue_ (“Tipping Point”)
- Families in hotels, peaked Aug. 2003
- _Framework _
- MA Interagency Council, chaired by Lt. Gov., bringing together corrections, housing, education, veterans, workforce development, finance, mental health, and welfare

## Framework (cont.)

**Homeless Individuals **_**Workgroup**_
- Includes members of PA4 team
- Implementation of recommendations
- “Cohort” study of 119 “street sleepers”

**Homeless Families **_**Workgroup**_
- Convened original by One Family Campaign around issues on as-needed basis, provided statewide public forums
- Formalized in August 2005 and includes MA team for PA9 on families

## Accomplishments (Family Side)

**Redesign of Family Shelter**
**Hiring of ICMs**
**Assessment Center pilots**
**Behavioral Health pilots**
**207 Shelter to Housing (S2H) vouchers**
**Expansion in beds**
**DTA/Housing Agency pilots**
**Aug. 2003 ******** Aug. 2004, Elimination of Hotels**

## Continue to change system, relying less on deep-end, emergency shelter
Press for regional collaboratives, partnering with communities
Look at recommendations of PA9, work into MA Interagency Council and DTA future efforts

- Press for regional collaboratives, partnering with communities
- Look at recommendations of PA9, work into MA Interagency Council and DTA future efforts

**Next Steps**
# Presentation: 028583

## VME interface
Fuse
Transient suppressor
Front panel leds
PCB
INIT_ integration
Led driving
VME common functions
Software conventions
Same chip 

**Fuse**
**Transient suppressor**
**Front panel leds**
**PCB**
**INIT_ integration**
**Led driving**
**VME common functions**
**Software conventions**
**Same chip **

**SVT-PISA standards**

## SVT-PISA standardsdetails

**VME interface****: **common FSM + custom logic
- implemented in all Pisa boards except HB
- supports SW and BLT, in non-privileged and supervisory modes (AM = 9,b,d,f)
**Fuse: **pico2  fuse (10A) (spring socket on PCB)
- AM: still to be specified (maybe 2 separated VCC planes each with a 10A picofuse)
**Transient suppressor:** motorola 1N5908 (ICTE-5)  1500 W peak power
**Front panel leds: **some leds common to all boards, other specific.** **
- common leds:  power, dtack, SVTerror, error,       ready (= RunMode), DS & HOLD for all cables
- we use 2/3 leds packages from MENTOR
**PCB****: **
- P0 and P3 footprint included in all boards, even if not needed, to maintain the possibility to solder the connectors if necessary
**INIT_ integration:** the INIT_ is required active for at least 100nsec, an integration logic is implemented  to avoid spurious glitches

## Led driving: driven by a monostable (74hc123) + logic to get continuos light for long signals
VME common functions:
all RAMs are R/W from VME 
all FIFOs are readable from VME and output FIFOs are also writeable
As a non-forcing rule, we tried to define registers with the same function at the same VME address in all the boards 
Software conventions: old C standard calls
names: merger_TmodeEnable( ... )
parameters: MERGER_FIFODEPTH 1024
global functions: MERGER_DEFINE(...) 
error codes: EXCEED_FIFO_LENGTH -102 (negative numbers from -100 and below)
Chip: same chips model for same functions
Fifo: CY7C4245-10  
Ram: KM681002B-10
Lvds: DS90C031 & 32
Abte: 74abte16245DL & 246DL

**VME common functions:**
- all RAMs are R/W from VME
- all FIFOs are readable from VME and output FIFOs are also writeable
- As a non-forcing rule, we tried to define registers with the same function at the same VME address in all the boards
**Software conventions:** old C standard calls
- names: merger_TmodeEnable( ... )
- parameters: MERGER_FIFODEPTH 1024
- global functions: MERGER_DEFINE(...)
- error codes: EXCEED_FIFO_LENGTH -102 (negative numbers from -100 and below)
**Chip:** same chips model for same functions
- Fifo: CY7C4245-10
- Ram: KM681002B-10
- Lvds: DS90C031 & 32
- Abte: 74abte16245DL & 246DL

**SVT-PISA standards****details**
# Presentation: 771666

## Welcome!

- “Understanding State and Regional Electricity Markets: Analytic Issues for Efficiency and Renewable Energy"
- Bobi Garrett

**Notes:**
These forums are designed to bring together energy analysts with other stakeholders to address analysis related to specific energy technology, policy, or market issues. 
1st -- The Role of Renewables in Regional Power Markets
2nd -- Analysis Related to the Role of Renewable Energy Technologies in Air-Quality Improvement
3rd --  Understanding the U.S. Strategic Interests in Expanding Renewable Energy Systems Worldwide

## National Renewable Energy Laboratory

**National Renewable Energy Laboratory**

**Mission:**** ***Develop renewable energy and energy efficiency *
*technologies and practices, advance related science and engineering, *
*and *_*transfer knowledge and innovations to address the nation's *_
_*energy and environmental  goals*_

- NREL R&D  Portfolio

## Key:  Focus on Decisions
# Presentation: 883319

## Asymmetry

**Charge **
**Asymmetry**

**In Top-Pair**
**Production**

***Dominic Hirschbühl***
***Thomas Müller***
***Thomas Peiffer***

***Wolfgang Wagner***
***Jeannine Wagner-Kuhr***
***Julia Weinelt***

**Universität **

**Karlsruhe**

## Charge Asymmetry

**SM:**** Asymmetry caused by interference of ME amplitudes for same FS **

**Predictions: **
**tt  (general):**** ****A****NLO ****= (4-7)%*****  ***
***                           *****A****LO**** = 0%**

***  ******(J. Kühn et al.:  ***
***arXiv:0709.1652)***

**Significant deviation would be an indica-**
**tion for new physics, e.g. Z' or axigluon**

***(in parton rest frame)***

**tt + g:**

**-**

**-**

**A****NLO ****= -(0-2)%*****  ***
**A****LO**** = -(9-10)%**

*** ******(P. Uwer et al.:  ***
***hep-ph/0703120)***

## Sensitive Variable: ΔyQl

**Asymmetry in parton rest **
**frame is largely recovered **
**by asymmetry in ****Δ****yQ****l**

**A(parton rest frame) **
**≈ ****1.3 ****A(lab frame)**
**Parton rest frame **
**not accessible in experiment**

***J. Kühn et al., arXiv:0709.1652***

## Selection and Reconstruction

** ****Event selection:**** Select Lepton+Jets events with N****jets ****≥ ****4, **
**                               ****N****b-tags ****≥ ****1, MET>20 GeV and exact one e or ****μ**** **
**                               ****with p_T>20 GeV**
**                               ****->**** ****484 top pair candidates**
** ****Background estimate:****  ****86.7****±****22.6 non-top events**
** ****Full reconstruction**** of top fourvectors by choosing one recon-**
**                                     ****struction hypothesis using constraints on **
**                                     ****m****W**** and the top mass difference, trans-**
**                                     ****verse energy of tops and the b-likeness **
**                                     ****of assigned b-jets**** **

## Correction Method

**Selection efficiency, **
**tt reconstruction and background **
**->  modification of **
**     ****true ****Δ****yQ****l  ****and A**

**-**

**Subtraction**
**of background**
**correct for other**
**effects using**
**a 4x4 matrix**

## Inclusive Asymmetry

**A****rec      **** = (8.7 ± 4.5) %**
**A****bg-sub**** = (11.9 ± 6.4) %**

**Correction with**
**4x4 matrix:**
**A = (24 ± 13 ± 4) %**

**NLO: (4-7)% in ****Δ****yQ****l**

## Exclusive Measurement – Abg sub(Njets)
# Presentation: 756266

## Experimental Facilities John Hill ASAC review October 10th , 2006

- Experimental Facilities** **John Hill ASAC review October 10th , 2006

## Design Specifications

- Ultra-high brightness
- Drives emittance, energy spread, stability.
- High flux
- Drives current, top-off, length of straight sections.
- Wide spectral range: 0.1 meV to 100 keV
- Drives user devices (BM, undulators, SCW), storage ring energy.

- _Experimental View:_

## Nano-probe: A high-brightness beamline

- NSLS-II goal: 1nm spatial resolution

## Importance of Electron Emittance

- So, as el        0, tot

- Where

- and

## Inelastic Scattering: A high flux beamline

- 0.1 meV station

- Floor layout

## Importance of Flux

- Figure of merit: Flux per meV

## Factors of two are Important

- _Inelastic x-ray scattering data:_

- APS: Beamline 9IDB

- Data took 24hrs to collect!

## Brightness Curves

**Notes:**
A 19mm PMU would have, according to Toshi, Keffective = 1.86, as opposed to Keff = 2.03 for the U19 CPMU.  The difference in the curves, e.g. brightness, from cold to warm is to lose the low energy ends of the tuning curves of each harmonic.  For example, the minimum energy of the fundamental would increase form 1470eV to 1650eV.

## Flux Curves

## IR from Bending Magnets

- Extraction of IR from BM appears feasible with good performance down to 1 cm-1

*1**st** collection mirror **integrated into **dipole chamber wall*

*Infrared exits through**slot in chamber wall*

*Electron **beam path*

- Currently looking into impact on accelerator and cost.

## Far-IR performance

## Effect of Energy Spread

## Effect of Insertion Device Length

- E=8.33 keV,
- 5th harmonic of U19

## Effect of 

- =L/2

- Maximum
- brightness

- L=3m
- =0.5 nm

- To a zeroth approximation, users want the most photons in the smallest spot, with the smallest divergence: Brightness

- For L=3m then
- optimum =0.5m

**Notes:**
Coupling =0.5% for the 3D plot.

## Current Parameters

- Angular acceptance of C(111)

- vertical 	Has minimal impact on photon beam.
- horiz 	Allows some tuning of photon 	divergence and beam size

**Notes:**
Wiggler vertical divergence = 170 microradians

## Usage of Facility

- 		Type 			IDs	BMs	Total	Total
- A	IR/UV/soft x-ray spectroscopy		1	11	12	10
- B	X-ray spectroscopy			6	3	9	9
- C	soft-matter/biophysics scattering	4	0	4	8
- D	hard matter/strongly correlated	9	1	10	8
- E	powder/single Xtal/high-P/optics	7	3	10	11
- F	Imaging/micro-probe		4	5	9	9
- G	Macromolecular crystallography	7	0	7	10
- 		Totals			**38****	****23****	****61****	****65**

- NSLS

- NSLS-II

## Summary

- Experimental facilities at NSLS-II will cover a wide range of photon energies. Users require:
- Brightness, flux, stability and reliability.
- A small number of beamlines will be built as part of the construction project with commissioning in 2013
- Remaining beamlines will be built with other funds (MIE and other non-BES funds) and brought online in the following years.
# Presentation: 508356

## Transition planning for young people preparing to age out of foster care

*Transition planning for young people preparing to age out of foster care*

- Kevin George, Foster Care Program Manager
- State of Oregon

## Foster Care Youth 

- Foster Care Youth

*Generally speaking:** *
- Youth are _not_ in foster care because of something they did wrong.
- There is a legal relationship for youth in foster care which often drives the decision, services, and practices for the social worker working with the youth.
- State laws and policies dictate when youth are no longer eligible for foster care services. In some States, this may be at age 18; in other States, it may continue to 21 years of age.

## Comprehensive        	Transition Plan 

- Comprehensive        	Transition Plan

-  Physical and Mental Health
-  Employment
-  Education
-  Life Skills
-  Housing
- Community Connections/                                                                                      Supportive Relationships

## Lessons Learned

*The C.T.P. is:*
- Providing the same tool to all participants, which helps put everyone on the same page with the same plan
- Bringing agencies and individuals together and thus avoiding duplication of work for the youth and agencies
- Being clear about the youth’s needs

**Notes:**
Recommended format at this time – for any youth in DHS care, age 16 or older.  Optional for 14 – 15 yr olds.

This is the template that will assist you in meeting the requirements of SB808.
Courts have been trained on this form and may ask for this specific form when reviewing a youth’s plan for transition to independence.

Plan must address the five areas per SB808

## Multisystem Planning

***State of Oregon – HB 2202***
- The State Commission on Children and Families shall lead a process to develop a comprehensive and coordinated approach for services and support for runaway and homeless youth and their families
***Legislative directed groups to participate with the Commission:***
- Juvenile Crime Prevention Advisory Committee, Employment Department, Department of Human Services – Child Welfare and TANF, Health Care – Mental Health, Housing and Community Services, Department of Community Colleges, Workforce Development, Department of Education, Oregon Youth Authority

## “In the final analysis, it is not what you do for your children but what you have taught them to do for themselves that will make them successful human beings.”    

- PowerPoint Slides courtesy of Fosterclub.org and DHS Independent Living Program

***“******In the final analysis, it is not what you do for your children but what you have taught them to do for themselves that will make them successful human beings.” ******   ***
***                                                ******Ann Landers***
# Presentation: 056775

## Heating Landfill Facilities Using Infrared Heaters – Part 2 and Project 2

- Darrin D. Dillah, PhD, PE

**S C S  E N G I N E E R S**

## Outline

- Introduction
- Frederick and Fairfax case studies
- Feasibility study
- Design
- Construction and operation
- Summary

## Introduction

- Technologies for utilizing LFG
- Conventional: boiler, electricity generation, pipeline upgrades...
- Emerging technologies:
- Vehicle fuel, micro turbine, fuel cells, greenhouses...
- Infrared radiant tube heaters - 1st in US

## Principle of Operation

- Infrared radiant tube heaters
- Same principle as the sun
- Heats the floor and objects

**Notes:**
Typically used to heat large spaces like garages, aircraft hangers, and maintenance shops

## Frederick Profile

- Permit 529; opened 1993, ~ closure 2030
- 170-acre facility; 90 acres for landfilling
- 1.5 million tons of waste
- 550 tpd
- 6-acre portion capped in 1999
- 500 cfm

## Frederick County Landfill, VA

**N**

- 0

- 1000

- 2000

- APPROXIMATE SCALE

- SCALE HOUSE

- MAINTENANCE SHOPS

**Notes:**
Pre 1998 aerial
544 acres total

## I-95 Profile

- Closed
- 260 acres landfilled
- 22 million tons of waste
- 130-acre portion capped
- 300 collection devices

## I-95 Landfill

- SCALE HOUSE

- MAINTENANCE SHOPS

- MAINTENANCE SHOP

- I-95

- Occoquan

- ~Waste Footprint

**Notes:**
Pre 1998 aerial
544 acres total

## Feasibility Study

- Analyzed various alternatives
- $12K-15K/yr. propane cost
- Recommended
- New infrared heaters
- Parallel with existing system
- Payback between 5 and 10 years

## LFG Service Line - Frederick

## Maintenance Building - Frederick

**Notes:**
4,500 sf, 30-ft ceilings
storage room 300 sf, 12-ft ceilings
corrugated metal wall w/ insulation

## Storage Building - Frederick

**Notes:**
2000sf, 16-ft roof

## Maintenance Building – I-95

**Notes:**
70*62 feet, 4,300 sf, 18-ft roof

## Design/Construction/Operation

- Frederick, < 30 cfm
- I-95, < 15 cfm
- Stainless steel above-grade, HDPE below grade
- Standards heaters - modified for LFG
- Simple controls

- Ordinary mechanical contractor
- Construction time - 3 months, 2/01 to 5/01
- Simple to operate
- Minimal maintenance expected

**Notes:**
Construction time Fred 2/01-5/01, I-95 1/05-3/05

## Startup/Operation

- Frederick Startup in late 2001
- Operated for a few weeks
- Problem with sensor fouling
- Fixed by filtering out siloxane
- Carbon-filled drums
- Operational since December 2002

## Summary

- First LFG infrared heater projects in the US
- Reasonable payback
- Less than 30 cfm LFG needed to heat about 6,500 sf
- Minimal gas treatment
- Low sophistication - simple to operate