# Presentation: 760564

## The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments

## Background of TUDA

**1**

## 2005 Trial Urban District Assessment Map

**2**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.

## Overview

**3**

## Overall Findings – Grade 4

**4**

## Overall Findings – Grade 4 (cont.)

**5**

## Overall Findings – Grade 8

**6**

## Overall Findings – Grade 8 (cont.)

**7**

## 2005 Mathematics Assessment

**8**

##  Score Results, Grade 4: 2003 and 2005

**9**

- * Significantly different from 2005.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

## Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: 2005

**10**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

## Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: 2005

**11**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

## Score Changes by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: 2003-2005

- NOTE: Shaded area indicates reporting standards not met.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

**12**

## White – Black Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005

- NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

**13**

## White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005

- ‡  Reporting standards not met.
- NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

**14**

## Score Results, Grade 8: 2003 and 2005

**15**

- * Significantly different from 2005.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

## Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: 2005

**16**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

## Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: 2005

**17**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

## Score Comparisons to Large Central City for Students Eligibile for Free/Reduced-Price School Lunch, Grade 8: 2005

**18**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

## 2005 Reading Assessment

**19**

## Score Results, Grade 4: 2002 - 2005

**20**

- * Significantly different from 2005.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

## Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: 2005

**21**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: 2005

**22**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## Score Results by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: 2005

**23**

- ‡ Reporting standards not met for Hispanic students in Atlanta.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## Score Results, Grade 8: 2002 - 2005

**24**

- * Significantly different from 2005.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

## Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: 2005

**25**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: 2005

**26**

- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## White – Black Score Gap, Grade 8: 2005

**27**

- ‡  Reporting standards not met.
- NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 8: 2005

**28**

- ‡  Reporting standards not met.
- NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.
- SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

## For More Information

**29**