# Presentation: 658832

## Run IIb Project Status

**Vivian O’Dell**

## Run IIb Upgrade Project

**Project Status Overview**
**Ingredients of the upgrade**
**Baselined Costs**
**Management **
**Upgrade schedule/Milestones**
**Obligations/ETC**
**End game – installation/commissioning**

## Run IIb Luminosity Projections

**~1.6e32 peak**
**~4.5 fb****-1**** **
**integrated**

**~2.8e32 peak**
**~8.6 fb****-1**** integrated**

**Accelerator draft plan:**
**Peak luminosities**

- Peak Luminosity (x1030cm-2sec-1)

**You are here**
**D0 Peak to date ~8E31**

**Upgrade**
**installation**

##  Run IIb upgrade

**Project consists of:**
**New Silicon Layer Zero detector**
**inner layer of silicon **
**Mitigate tracking losses due to radiation damage and detector aging**
**Provide more robust tracking and pattern recognition for higher luminosities**
**Improve impact parameter resolution**
**Trigger Upgrade**
**Complete upgrade program to keep trigger rates down as luminosity increases**
**L1 upgrades (Calorimeter, Central Track Trigger, Cal Trk-Match)**
**L2 upgrades (Silicon Track Trigger, L2 ******** processors)**
**New electronics for central fiber tracker (AFE II)**
**Helps tracking efficiency in higher luminosity/occupancy environment **
**Final decision to be made after first full prototype tested – 2/05**
**DAQ/Online upgrade**
**Upgrade level 3 processing power, database & host servers, control systems**

## Silicon Layer Ø

_**Universities on DØ-LØ**_
**Brown **
**California State,Fresno**
**CINVESTAV Mexico **
**Fermilab**
**University of Illinois Chicago**
**Kansas State University**
**Kansas University**
**Louisiana Tech University **
**Michigan State University **
**Moscow State University**
**Northwestern University **
**Rice University **
**University of Rochester **
**SUNY-Stony Brook **
**University of Washington**
**Large NSF MRI grant (~$700k)**
**Additional in-kind university support**

**See talk by A. Bean**

## Run IIb Trigger Upgrade

**Level 1**
**Calorimeter trigger upgrade**
**sharpens turn-on trigger thresholds**
**more topological cuts **
**Calorimeter track-match**
**fake EM rejection**
**tau trigger**
**L1 tracking trigger upgrade (CTT)**
**improved tracking rejection especially at higher occupancies**
**Level 2**
**L2 Processor upgrades for more complex algorithms**
**Silicon Track Trigger expansion**
**More processing power **
**use trigger inputs from new silicon layer Ø**
**New Readout Electronics for Central Fiber Tracker**

**See talk by B. P. Padley**

## Central Fiber Tracker readout upgrade (AFE II)

**AFE II + TriPT will**
**Improve noise floor and pedestal stability **
**Better hit efficiency and point resolution**
**Readout architecture much more flexible**
**Less deadtime**
**Added functionality of the TriPT*****  *****(z information)**
**Significant reduction in track reconstruction time**
**R&D for AFE II is going well**
**Expect prototype AFE + TRiP early fall**
**TripT submission early fall – back for testing late fall**
**This part of the project is only conditionally approved**
**Plan to test prototype **
**Hold DØ internal review 1/05**
**If review positive, hold laboratory review 2/05**
**If all reviews positive, then will go ahead with project**
**Have earmarked Run IIb project money for this**
**$1.47M + 0.66M Contingency**

**See talk by A. Bross**

## DAQ/Online

| System | Items | Need |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Level 3 filter nodes | 96 more L3 Farm nodes | Match to rates and processing requirements |
| DAQ HOST system | Linux data logging nodes and buffer disk arrays | Replace existing systems with higher performance nodes |
| ORACLE systems | Database nodes, disk arrays, and backup systems | Adopt lab standard ORACLE platform |
| File Server systems | Linux server nodes, disk arrays, and backup systems | Provide increased storage capacity |
| Slow Control system | VME processors for control and monitoring of detector | Improve monitoring performance for extended run |

**Upgrades to DAQ/Online systems required for long-term, high rate running during Run IIb**

**See talk by S. Fuess**

## DZero RunIIb Director’s Review

**Project baseline cost profiles**

## DZero RunIIb Director’s Review

**Total Project Costs, burdened AY k$ as rebaselined January 2004**

**Includes MRI + InKind + R&D over lifetime of the project**

## DZero RunIIb Director’s Review

**Total DOE MIE Costs, burdened AY k$ as rebaselined January 2004**

**Includes AFEII costs: $1.47M in trigger costs + 0.7M in contingency**
**This is the rebaselined total for the project**

## DZero RunIIb Director’s Review

**Management Structure and reporting**

##  Run IIb Upgrade Organization

** ****Run IIb Upgrade Organization**

**Installation /commissioning not formally part of the project**
**Clearly important**
**We have a structure in place working on this**
**More on this later in this talk**
**Project personnel are overseeing installation **

##  Project Reporting 

**Vehicles for reporting**
**Use MS project to track progress of project**
**Monthly updates by L2/L3 managers**
**Update % complete/forecast dates**
**Use parts of COBRA (lab project reporting machinery)**
**reports actual costs/baseline scheduled value/earned value**
**Monthly reports**
**Monthly reports to Lab and DOE management**
**Include milestones/costs/obligations**
**Change requests**
**Generated whenever there is a significant change in project:**
**Schedule**
**Cost**
**Scope**

##  Project Schedule: Director’s Milestones

##  COBRA output 

##  What we can learn from COBRA 

**BCWS (Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled)**
**Comes from baselined MS project file using “aggressive” schedule**
**Recalculated whenever there is a change request**
**BCWP (Budgeted Cost of Work Performed)**
**Comes from %complete in schedule**
**Recalculated each month**
**BCWP/BCWS (SPI) is a measure of how closely we are following the schedule**
**Note that COBRA only cares about the DOE money part of the project, so these numbers aren’t the whole picture**
**Trigger – 0.81**
**L1 Cal – 0.83 – want to reexamine with some possible rebaselining**
**Rebaselined CTT with new scope – 0.95**
**Rebaselined Cal-Track Match – 0.99**
**STT – 0.45 – Delay is desirable/intentional, but need to examine/rebaseline**
**Online – 1.06**
**Silicon Layer 0 – 0.98**

##  What we can learn from COBRA 

**BCWP (Budgeted Cost of Work Performed)**
**Comes from % complete in schedule**
**Recalculated each month**
**ACWP (Actual Cost of Work Performed)**
**Comes from FNAL business systems**
**Accruals done for University PO’s**
**Recalculated each month**
**BCWP/ACWP (CPI) is a measure of how closely we are following the budget**
**FNAL labor can be tracked fairly well**
**M&S costs are different – they get into the system AFTER the equipment is received – typically several months after the requisition is put out**
**University is considered M&S – effort to accrue this in a timely fashion, but it isn’t always easy**
**The best use of this information for us is:**
**Track FNAL labor costs using BCWP/ACWP**
**Track M&S costs via L2/L3 managers**

##  Tracking FNAL Labor Costs 

**Labor costs lower than expected**
**Dominated by Layer 0 labor costs**
**Did not need additional engineering during design phase**
**Will need this during production however**
**University of Washington picking up some of the work**

**Cumulative ACWP/BCWP (1/CPI) = 0.59**
**CPI = 1.7 **

**FNAL  labor only**

##  Projected Spending Profile 

**Does not include trigger MRI or InKind contributions**

##  Understanding large M&S bump 

##  Cumulative cost estimates  

##  DOE MIE Current Spending Estimate To Completion  

##  Current Spending, ETC

**Still large management reserve**
**University costs coming in slowly**
**Need to put all FY04/FY05 PO’s in place**
**Need MR for end game!**

**DOE MIE Only**

##  Change Requests 

**Since rebaselining last November (after cancellation of full run2b upgrade)**
**Cal-track match**
**Schedule change**
**Negligible cost change**
**CTT**
**Major cost change**
**No higher level milestone schedule change**
**Cost changes come out of management reserve (i.e. contingency)**
**Have redistributed ~$400k from contingency**
**Mainly for CTT upgrade**

**See talk by B. P. Padley**

## L1 CTT Rescope

**Rescoped the L1 CTT April this year**
**In order to make system commissioning easier:**
**A new motherboard (daughterboard – to a less extent) design.**
**A new DFE crate controller with a faster connection to the D0 online computers.  **
**A new DFE backplane design **
**Plan to run on a partial crate of the new system on the platform in parallel with the existing DFEA using LVDS splitters**
**Key to successful commissioning of the new system**
**Had formal D0 internal review April 5**
**Darin Acosta (chair), John Anderson, Bill Freeman**
**No technical concerns, project management tools in good shape**
**Reviewed by Directorate in April PMG ****	**
**Change Request signed off end of April**
**Represents $390k change in total cost+contingency**
**No higher level milestones affected**

**See talk by B. P. Padley**

##  Installation/Commissioning 

**Different kinds of commissioning**
**Technical commissioning**
**Hardware works, protocol tested, inputs/outputs verified**
**Physics commissioning**
**System calibrated, understood, efficiencies calculated, all “downstream” software in place and tested**
**Project plan includes full system technical commissioning before installation**
**Some preparatory work is schedule for the coming shutdown**
**Some layer 0 infrastructure installed**
**CTT/L1 Cal infrastructure for pre-installation commissioning**
**Installation/Commissioning schedule includes all installation and commissioning tasks needed to bring the system up**
**Project on track for installation during 2005 shutdown **
**Flexibility in shutdown scheduling would none the less be prudent**
**Physics commissioning includes all tasks associated with simulating/unpacking/monitoring and calibrating the systems**
** ****Have formed a collaboration wide committee (SC-IPC) to examine the full physics commissioning phase**

**See talk by R. Smith**

## Conclusions

**Project is making impressive technical progress**
**Trigger solidly in prototype testing phase**
**All major calorimeter trigger boards testing prototypes**
**Trigger work maintaining a very aggressive schedule**
**Layer Ø took full advantage of original Run IIb R&D and is moving quickly**
**All high lead time components have been ordered**
**Project is keeping to a very aggressive schedule**
**Online systems have “redesigned” server options**
**Allows us to take full advantage of Moore’s law**
**Faster, cheaper, better**
**Costs are under control**
**Tools in place to understand/track them (more or less)**
**Full project on schedule for FY05 installation**
**Installation/Commissioning plans are mature**
**Pre-installation plans for 2004 shutdown**
**Main installation during 2005 summer/fall shutdown**
**Resource loaded installation schedule exists and is updated as our understanding matures**