# Presentation: 016406

## The decision to use a pass/fail system is:

- The new Pass/Fail performance management system was effective January 1, 1999 for all FSA employees including County Office employees, at locations where there are no recognized bargaining units.

- 1. 	To simplify the appraisal process
- 2. 	To focus more attention on employee
- 3. 	Feedback and development, and
- 4. 	To foster a sense of teamwork.

## Current System

- _Three Level Element Rating_:
- Does Not Meet Fully Successful
- Meets Fully Successful
- Exceeds Fully Successful

- _Five Level Summary  Rating_:
- Unacceptable
- Marginal
- Fully Successful
- Superior
- Outstanding

## Two level summary rating:

-  	Results not achieved

- _Two level summary rating:_
- (same as above but equating to)
-   Fully Successful
-   Unacceptable

- _Two level element rating:_

## AD 2000

- Performance Plan Agreement and Appraisal Form

- 1. 	Critical Elements Only.
- 2. 	Generic Elements and Standards.
- 3.	2 to 5 Elements.
- 4.	Can Supplement the Generic Standard 	as needed.

- Continued on next slide

## AD 2000

- Performance Plan Agreement and Appraisal Form

- 5.	Element 9 - EO/CR _for managers._
- 6.	Element 10 - EO-CR for employees.
- 7.	Blank spaces for specialized 			elements 13, 14 and 15.
- 8.  Rating Certification.

## CONTINUING CONCEPTS

-  	New standards established within 30 days 	of position change
-  	Performance Standards
-   	Performance Work Plan
-   	Critical Elements
-   	Appraisal Period
-  	Minimum Appraisal Period (90 days)

- Continued on next slide

## CONTINUING CONCEPTS

-  	Progress Reviews
-   	Element Rating
-   	Rating of Record
-   	Rating Official
-   	Rating Official prevails
-   	Reviewing Official

## NEW CONCEPTS

-   Opportunity to Improve
-   Results Achieved
-   Results Not Achieved
-   Additional Performance Elements
-   All Elements Are Critical
-   New Forms

## L I N K A G E S

-   	RESULTS ACHIEVED NEEDED FOR WGI.
-   	RESULTS ACHIEVED NEEDED FOR 			CAREERLADDER PROMOTION.
-   	TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 		CAN FLOW FROM APPRAISAL.
-   	RATING HELPS SET SERVICE CREDIT 		AND RETENTION STANDING FOR RIF.

## EMPLOYEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR:

-  	_Communicating_ with the Supervisor throughout the
-   	appraisal period.
-  	_Participating_ in the development of performance 		work plans and measurable performance standards.
-  	_Assuring_ that they have a _clear_ understanding of 	their rating official’s expectations and requesting
- 	clarification when necessary.
-  	_Assisting_ in identifying training needs to enhance
-  	performance.

- Continued on next slide

## EMPLOYEES ARE  RESPONSIBLE FOR:

-   _Managing_ performance to achieve expectations and
-      bringing to the rating official’s attention
-     circumstances that may effect achievement of
-     standards.
-   _Participating_ in discussions of individual performance.
-   _Actively listening and considering_ feedback with an
-     open mind.
-   _Providing_ input on accomplishments.
-   _Improving _those aspects of performance identified as
-     needing improvement

## Rating OFFICIALS are RESPONSIBLE for:

-  	**Informing** employees of the overall mission, objectives, 	goals, plans, and Agency activities, work unit and the 	employee’s related duties and responsibilities.
- 	**Providing feedback** to the employee through ongoing 	communication and **actively listening and considering    ****	**feedback from the employee and customers.
-  	**Providing the employee the opportunity** to participate in 	developing performance work plans.
- 	**Conducting and documenting at least one formal   ****	****progress review** around the midpoint of the appraisal 	period and additional reviews as necessary.

- Continued on next slide

## Rating OFFICIALS are RESPONSIBLE for:

- 	**Completing performance ratings** which include  		evaluating and documenting employees’ actual   		accomplishments and determining summary levels.
-  	**Recommending personnel actions and/or training**, as 	necessary, based on the employee’s 	level of 		performance in relation to the performance 		standards and elements.
-  	**Addressing concerns** at the lowest possible level.

## THE “ADDITIONAL” PERFORMANCE ELEMENT

- Why would I want to use an “additional” performance element if it cannot be considered in the performance rating?

- 1.  New Work Assignment.
- 2.  Group Performance.
- 3.  Awards

## THE “ADDITIONAL” PERFORMANCE ELEMENT 

- What is an “additional” performance element?  An additional performance element is a “dimension or aspect of individual, team, or organizational performance that is not a critical element” and cannot be used in assigning a summary rating level.

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- _Introduction_
- The contract adopts the Employee Recognition Program Handbook for the Service Center Agencies.  This can be found on the HRD website at:
- 	http://dc.ffasintranet.usda.gov/hrd/cmmnreco.htm

- Continued on next page

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- _The Handbook_
- In previous years, employees who received Outstanding ratings were guaranteed their choice of either a QSI, a Performance Bonus, or a Time Off Award.  Because of this, most of the awards budget was spent on QSIs, little being left for Extra Effort/Spot Awards during the rest of the FY.  The typical “cost” of a QSI over one year was $850 for a GS-7 and $1,550 for a GS-12.

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- Under the new policy, there is an effort to de-link ratings and awards.  The idea is to give awards based on specific accomplishments rather than ratings.  This will be a transition year. Even though we are trying to de-link ratings and awards, **you can still give awards based on ratings - it’s just they’re no longer mandatory**.  Employees with Outstanding ratings may receive smaller awards, or possibly no award at all.  The idea is to free up more money for Extra Effort/Spot Awards during the rest of the FY.

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- 1.	QSI.
- 2.	Cash Awards: amounts up $500 processed as Spot 		Awards (i.e.., employee gets actual amount and NFC 		“grosses up” total to cover taxes), amounts over 		$500 processed as Extra Effort Awards (ie., taxes 		withheld up front and employee only receives “after 		taxes” amount).
- 3.	Time Off Awards - of up to 40 hours per award (an 		employee can only receive up to 80 hours in time off 		awards per leave year).  Note: time off awards are 		transferable within an agency, but not between 		agencies.

- Continued on next page

- The following are the types of awards available under the new Employee Recognition Program:

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- 4.	Certificates, Letters of Commendation, 			“Thank You” Notes.
- 5.	Keepsakes (suitable for display and with Agency 	logo) - awards money can be used to purchase these 	items.
- 6.	Agency/Department Honorary Awards.

- The following are the types of awards available under the new Employee Recognition Program:

- Continued on next page

## EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

- Although QSI’s are no longer mandatory with an Outstanding rating, they are still available with a written justification.
- Performance Bonuses are not mentioned in the new policy.  If you do wish to give a lump-sum cash award based on a rating, you can designate it as an Extra Effort Award and it will achieve the same purpose.
- Employees are eligible for more than one award each year: they are eligible for an award each time they do something deserving.
- It is important that the system be and be seen as equitable, therefore, it will be necessary for supervisors to establish criteria granting awards which they will apply consistently across their area of responsibility.

## CONTRACT TRAINING:  

**EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION**

- It is recommended that awards be meaningful.  This means that the value of the award matches the contribution.  If the contribution is very important, the award should be sizeable. At the other end of the scale, even the most minor recognition - such as a keepsake - should be meaningful and not be perceived as being “cheap”.

- Continued on next page

## CONTRACT TRAINING:  

**EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION**

- _Other Provisions_
- *	When the awards money is allocated to the 	Deputy Administrators, they allocate 75% 	to their Division Directors immediately and 	hold 25% back for distribution later in the 	year.  This is to ensure that money is 		available throughout the year to recognize 	deserving accomplishments.

- Continued on next page

## CONTRACT TRAINING:  

- EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION

- *	Any employee may nominate any co-worker 	for any award except a QSI (the supervisor 	must nominate for this) - as a courtesy, 		when giving a 	time off award, the 			supervisor of the employee receiving the 		award should be contacted beforehand to 	make sure no undue burden is being 		placed on the work unit.

- Continued on next page

## CONTRACT TRAINING:  

- EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION

- *	Two new Employee Recognition Program Review 		committees are established - one for RMA and one 	for FSA.  These committees are to administer, 		assess, and review the Employee Recognition 		Programs to ensure they comply with the principles 	of non-discrimination, equity, 	timeliness, etc.  They 	are also responsible for publishing the names of 		recipients of awards.  They have both held their 		initial meetings and have begun their work.
- _Contacts_
- Stephen Crisp, HRD (202) 418-8975 or
- Cheryl Fuller, HRD (202) 418-8973

## TWO-LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 

- Performance Management Policy Manual
- _http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dam/forms/fsaforms.asp _
- Form AD-2000 Performance Plan Agreement and Appraisal
- Form AD-2000A, Opportunity-To-Improve
- _http://dc.ffasintranet.usda.gov/hrd/cmmnreco.htm- _
- Employee Recognition and Awards

- TWO-LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
- WEBSITES

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _Who is covered by the Program?_

- Performance management is a management function which includes the processes of planning, monitoring, developing appraising, and rewarding performance.

- This program covers ALL non-SES employees, who are reasonably expected to be employed for greater than 90 days, in Rural Development, Natural Resources Conservation Service, RMA and Farm Service Agency, including FSA County employees, Schedule C employees are covered by this program but are not afforded any rights as established by 5 United States Code (USC) 4303.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What are the legal authorities that govern Performance Management?_

- This program complies with the USDA Performance Management System established on June 12, 1996; Chapter 43 of Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

- _What are the responsibilities of employees?_

-  	Communicating with the Supervisor throughout the 		appraisal period.
-  	Participating in the development of work plans and 		measurable performance standards.

- Continued on next slide

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION

-  	Managing performance to achieve expectations and 		bringing to the rating official's attention circumstances 	that may affect achievement of standards.
-  	Participating in discussions of individual performance.
-  	Actively listening and considering feedback with an 		open mind.
-   	Providing input on accomplishments.
-   	Improving those aspects of performance identified as 		needing improvement.

- _What are the responsibilities of employees?_

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What are the responsibilities of the Rating Official?_

-   	Informing employees of the overall mission, objectives, 	goals, plans, and activities of the agency and work unit 	and the employee’s related duties and responsibilities.
-  	Providing feedback to the employee through ongoing 		communication and actively listening and considering 		feedback from the employee and customers.
-  	Providing the employee the opportunity to participate in 	the development of performance work plans.
-  	Providing employees with written performance work plans 	which identify the critical performance elements related 	to their specific duties, responsibilities, and expected 		levels of performance.

- Continued on next slide

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What are the responsibilities of the Rating Official?_

-  	Conducting and documenting at least one formal progress 	review around the midpoint of the appraisal period and 		additional reviews as necessary.
-  	Completing performance rating which include evaluating 	and documenting employee’s actual accomplishments 		and determining summary levels.
-   	Recommending personnel actions and/or training, as 		necessary, based on the employee’s level of performance 	in relation to the performance standards and elements.
-   	Addressing concerns at the lowest possible level.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What are the responsibilities of the Reviewing Official?_

-  	Reviewing and concurring in “*results not achieved*” 	ratings.
-  	Resolving differences between employees and 		rating officials concerning ratings and adjusting 		ratings when necessary.
-   	Assisting in resolving concerns at the lowest 		possible level.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _When should new performance plans be established_

- STANDARDS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED:

-   	Within 30 days of appointment.
-  	If employee is reassigned/promoted to a new 		position.
-  	If an employee is being detailed to a different area 	for more than the minimal appraisal period.
-   	Within 30 days of the beginning of an appraisal 		period.
-   	If the duties of the position are substantially 		changed during the established appraisal period.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is a performance work plan?_

- A *performance work plan* is a written document that identifies *critical* elements of an employee’s position and the standards by which they will be rated.

- _What is a critical element?_

- A *critical element* is a work assignment or responsibility of such importance that unacceptable performance on the element would result in a determination that the employee’s overall performance is at the unacceptable, or “Result Not Achieved” level.
- Non-critical duties are not included in performance plans.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the difference between an element and a standard?_

- An *element* is a component of a position consisting of one or more duties and responsibilities which contribute toward accomplishing the goals and objective of the organization.
- A *standard* is a management-approved expression of the performance threshold(s), requirement(s), or expectation(s) that must be met to be appraised at a particular level of performance.  It may include, but is not limited to, quality, quantity, cost-efficiency, timeless, and manner of performance.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _How is the plan developed?_

- Communication between the rating official and the employee is essential in developing performance work plans.  Rating officials and employees should work together to jointly clarify how competencies apply within the work environment so that there is a common understanding about the expectations for performance.  In addition, there should be a discussion of the goals of the individual work unit and the employee’s involvement, or contribution, to unit goals for the upcoming year.

- Continued on next slide

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- The employee and rating official sign and date the plan indicating that it has been discussed and that the employee has had the opportunity to obtain a clear understanding of expectations.

- _How is the plan developed?_

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What methods could be used to assist in developing work plan that reflect organizational goals and strategic plans?_

- Appendix B, *Quick Reference for Developing Employee Performance Plans That Link to Organizational Goals*, provide an 8-step method which can be used to incorporate organizational goals and objectives.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the established format?_

- Performance plans are developed on AD-2000, Performance Work Plan.  This form provides a description of the element and the result expected.  The form also has a place for employees and rating officials to provide further clarification of performance expectations, if needed.  The employee and rating official may also provide written comments during the progress reviews.  The form also contains discussion topics for use in planning performance and conducting progress reviews.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _How many elements are required in a performance plan?_

- Employees may have a minimum of two, but no more than five, rating elements in their performance plans.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- Only *critical **elements may be included in the performance plan*.  All employees must have at least one job specific performance element.  This may include supervision, individual contributions to team accomplishments, execution of duties, etc., or an element may be specifically written for this purpose in the blank numbered blocks provided at the end of the standardized elements.
- A* **mandatory* Equal Opportunity/Civil Rights (EO/CR) element is required as a stand-alone element for all supervisory and managerial officials (Element 9).  Employees who are not supervisors must also have the EO/CR (Element 10) standard; this has been incorporated into Element 10.

- _What types of elements may be included in a performance plan?_

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is an additional performance element?_

*Additional performance elements* provide agencies another tool for communicating performance expectation important to the organization.  In essence, they are dimensions or aspects of overall performance that the agency wishes to communicate and, appraise, but which will not be used in assigning a summary level.  Such additional elements may include objectives, goals, programs plans, work plans, and other methods of expression expected performance.  Further information on additional elements and examples will be provided.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _If additional performance elements are not attached to the Performance plan, what purpose do they serve?_

- Additional performance elements communicate a fuller picture of the performance that is expected and encourage dialogue between supervisor, employees, and peers that otherwise might not have taken place.  They provide a tool for monitoring and tracking team and/or group performance and individual expectations toward accomplishing organization goals.

- _What is the established format for additional elements?_

- Additional elements are to be provided separately in a format best suited for the element and are not attached to the performance plan.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What if there is a disagreement with the content of the performance plan?_

- The rating official and the employee should attempt to resolve the disagreement informally.  If an agreement cannot be reached, the rating official’s decision prevails.

- _What are the alternatives if a performance plan is not received within the specified timeframe?_

- If an employee does not receive a performance plan within the specified time frame, they should contact their rating official to inquire of the status and request a meeting to jointly develop             the standards.  If standards are still not established, the employee        should seek assistance from the rating official’s supervisor or their  Service Human Resource Office.  Bargaining Unit employees may also seek the assistance of their exclusive representative.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What if an employee refuses to sign a Performance Plan?_

- If the employee refuses to sign the performance                   work plan, the supervisor should note this in the          employee’s signature block, along with the date                the plan was discussed and implemented.  Lack                 of the employee’s signature does not negate implementation of the plan.

- _Can performance plans be grieved?_

- By law, the contents of a performance plan cannot be grieved.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _Who retains the performance plan?    _

- Throughout the appraisal period, the rating official              will maintain the original copy of the performance             plan.  The employee will be provided with a copy.

- _How will performance be monitored and appraised?_

- The employee and Rating Official will meet periodically throughout the appraisal period to provide feedback relating to performance.  This will be accomplished through progress review(s), performance ratings, and ongoing communication.  The methods for monitoring performance, i.e., should be discussed with the employee prior to implementation of the performance plan.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the appraisal period?_

- Appraisal period refers to the period of time during                              which an employee’s performance will be reviewed             and a rating of period generally begins on                     October 1 of each year and end on September 30                   of the following year.

- _What is the minimum appraisal period?_

- The minimum appraisal period is the 90-calendar-day period of time, or such other period of time as established in local negotiated labor-management agreements, during which an employee must have operated under a performance work plan and for which the employee may receive a performance rating.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is a Progress Review?_

- _How often are Progress Reviews held?_

- A progress review is a joint discussion between the rating official and the employee regarding specific strengths and weaknesses in relation to the employee’s performance work plan, as well as any areas of performance which are central to the employees’ position.  Open dialog between the employee and the rating official is crucial.  A progress review does not involve the issuance of a rating of record

- Progress reviews are conducted at least once during a full appraisal period.  Normally these required reviews will be accomplished during the midpoint of the appraisal period.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What should an employee do if a Progress review is not received?_

- If a progress in not conducted, the employee should         contact their rating official to inquire of the status.                   If progress reviews are still not held, the employee           should seek assistance from the second level supervisor.  Bargaining unit employees may seek the assistance from their exclusive representative.

- _Who is responsible for initiating Progress Reviews?_

- Rating officials are responsible for initiating communication with the employee about actual performance and ensuring progress reviews are held.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _How are Progress Reviews documented?_

- The Rating Official is encouraged to make written comments concerning the employee’s performance on AD-2000.  The purpose of the written comments is to provide for amore formal identification of the employee’s performance in relation to the performance work plan.  The employee is also encouraged to provide written comments on the form at this time.  Both the employee and the Rating Official must initial the appropriate blocks to indicate the discussions were held.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is a Rating of Record?_

- A *Rating of record* is the final issued at the end of the appraisal period.  It becomes a part of the employee’s performance file (EPF) maintained in the Servicing Human Resource Office.  A rating of “Results Achieved” or “Results Not Achieved” is assigned to each element at this time, as well as the overall summary rating.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _When is a Rating of Record given?_

- Normally, the rating of record is issued annually for the appraisal period ending September 30.  Employees who have not served under established standards for the minimum appraisal period must have the time frame extended to meet this requirement.  Once the minimum appraisal period has been completed, a rating of record must be issued.

- _Are ratings of record given at the completion of details and temporary promotion?_

- No; however, the rating official to whom the employee was detailed will document the employee’s accomplishments and forward the information to the employee’s permanent supervisor to be considered when completing the annual performance rating record.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _Are rating of records given when there is a change in positions and/or supervisors?_

- No; however, each individual who supervised the employee for 90 days or more during the appraisal period should discuss the performance with the employee, prepare feedback comments, and forward them to the current rating official.

- _Are ratings of records given when there is a reassignment or promotion but no change of supervisor?_

- No; however, the supervisor should prepare written documentation of the employee’s performance under the previous position and this information will be considered in the employee’s annual rating of record.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the difference between a rating or “Result Achieved” and “Results Not Achieved”?_

- An overall summary level of “Results Achieved” means that the employee has met the performance expectations for each element.  “Results Not Achieved” means that the employee has not met performance expectations for one or more element(s) and constitutes unacceptable performance.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _How are Ratings of Record documented?_

- The rating official places a checkmark in the                  “Achieved” or “Not Achieved” column on AD-2000           indicating the individual element rating for only those   elements selected to be a part of the performance work plan.
- “Results Achieved” performance requires no written comments and requires only the signature of the rating official and the employee.  No higher level review is required.
- “Results Not Achieved” performance requires written comments to be attached to the performance work plan and must be signed by the rating official and the reviewing official prior to presenting to the employee for signature.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What if the employee refuses to sign the ratings of record?_

- The employee’s signature only indicates                                                receipt of the rating; it does not represent                        agreement with the rating.  If the employee                        refuses to sign the rating of record, the                                  rating official should note this in the                             appropriate block and indicate the                                           date the rating was issued.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What if performance improvement is needed?_

- If improvement is needed at any time during the appraisal period, the rating official should discuss and consider reasonable means by which to assist the employee in improving.  Such means may include training, closer supervision, revision of assignments, coaching, or placing the employee under an official opportunity-to-improve period (OTI).  This may also be refereed to as a performance improvement period (PIP), opportunity period, or improvement period.
- It is responsibility of the Rating Official to contact the Office to determine the appropriate course of action.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _When is an Opportunity-to-improve(OTI) necessary?_

- An OTI is necessary as soon at it is determine that one or more element(s) is found to be at the “Results Not Achieve” level.  This determination can be made at any time during the appraisal cycle; it is not necessary to wait until the actual rating of record completed.  The Rating Official and employee, with the technical assistance of the Servicing Human Resource Office, will then jointly complete AD-2000A Opportunity to Improve.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the purpose of an OTI?_

- An OTI provides the employee a reasonable opportunity to improve performance to the acceptable level.
- Components of the plan consist of:
-   	the length of time it is in effect,
-   	the element(s) which is/are unacceptable,
-   	the specific deficiencies,
-   	the required improvement(s) to raise performance,
-   	the support/assistance to be provided, and
-   	the frequency of follow-up reviews.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What is the duration of an OTI?_

- The OTI (AD-2000A) states the length of time for which it is in effect, which must be minimum of 60 days.  The duration will be determined by considering the type of position for which the OTI is being prepared, the type of improvement needed, the amount of reasonable time necessary to demonstrate the acceptable performance, and applicable negotiated labor-management agreements.

- _What will happen at the end of the OTI period?_

- A final review will be conducted and will state whether performance meets or does not meet expectations.  If it does not meet expectations, then the rating official must provide written comments supporting this determination.  The rating official will contact the Servicing Human Resource Office to determine further action necessary.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What happens if performance is at the acceptable level at the close of the OTI?_

- At the end of the OTI if performance is at the “results achieve” level, the employee must sustain acceptable performance in the element(s) which resulted in the OTI for one year from the commencement date.  Should performance later reach an unacceptable level in the same element(s), a performance-based adverse action, or other without the benefit of an additional improvement period.

- _What if performance remains unacceptable?_

- If an employee’s performance remains unacceptable at the conclusion of the improvement period, the employee shall be reassigned, reduced in grade, or removed.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What impact does a Rating of Record have on within-grade increases (WGI’s) and promotions?_

- No employee shall receive a WGI or promotion unless the most recent rating of record is “Results Achieved.”  A “Results Achieved” rating is not the only criteria for promotion.

- _Will employees still have the opportunity to receive recognition based on performance?_

- Yes; employees will be eligible for quality step increase and other forms of recognition based on outstanding accomplishments.  Procedures and criteria for nominating and approving performance-based recognition are covered in the Employee Recognition Policy.
-              http://dc.ffasintranet.usda.gov/hrd/comnreco.htm

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _Will employees still receive service credit and retention standing for reduction-in-force (RIF) purposes?_

- Yes; rating will continue to be used to establish service credit and retention standing for RIF purposes under the two level system all employee with a summary rating of results achieved will receive 16 years performance credit in a RIF situation**.  **To provide adequate time to properly determine an employee’s retention standing prior to a RIF, a general or specific RIF notice will specify the date after which no new rating of record will be given that could be used to determine retention standing and will address how service credit will be applied.  Employee should pay particular attention to these notices.

## AWARDS

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _What (if any) latitude under the pass/fail categories do supervisors have to differentiate performance?_

- There is an established performance plan (12 elements/ standards) format that everyone will use.  Within each standard, you are able to provide “further clarification” as needed to differentiate performance-specific measurable tasks, etc.
- Or you may develop specifically written elements/standards (elements 13-15) that are more relevant to the employee’s position.  Keep in mind that you must have at least 2 but no more than 5 elements (with at least one job specific performance element) and all elements are critical.
- We encourage supervisors and managers to utilize the awards program to recognize employees’ accomplishments throughout the year.  By doing so, distinguishing the top performer from the not so proactive performer is documented throughout the appraisal period.

## FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

- _With the old system, you were given a cash award or either a step, increase, when you got a “outstanding rating” .  Under the new system will this option still be available?_

- Awards based on ratings are still available.  It’s just they are no longer mandatory.  It will be up to the supervisor to determine whether or not to give a performance award (QSI, case, or time off).

- _Is this for managers only? __(new performance management system)_

- No.  The new policy will cover all employees except members of the senior executive service.