# Presentation: 342104

## Section 1

_***Section 1***_
***Introduction***

*** ******. . . Bryant Cramer***
*EO-1 Mission Implementation Manager*

## Purpose of the Meeting

***Purpose of the Meeting***

***Background:***
***Due to several recent failures, the NASA Administrator has requested a critical Red Team Review be conducted prior to the launch of all NASA missions***
***Specific Objectives:***
***Enhance the probability of success by using additional technical expertise to review all critical aspects of these missions***
***Identify all residual risk that could significantly affect mission success***
***Assess all single-point failure mechanisms***
***Prepare an overall mission risk assessment***

## Red Team Structure

***Red Team Structure***

***Chairman (Bill Taylor) and 8 members:***
***Ray Hook***
***Ann Merwarth***
***Joe Nieberding******	***
***Jean Olivier******	***
***Ken Sizemore******	***
***Ron Thomas******	***
***Ute Ingrid (Judi) vonMehlem ******	***
***Flight Assurance Specialist******	***

## Red Team Schedule

***Red Team Schedule***

***Primary Red Team Review March 28-31, 2000***
***Ideally, the Red Team Review would occur after the Final Comprehensive Performance Test (CPT) and before shipping the Spacecraft to the launch site***
***Due to the WARP recovery, we have not finished the final CPT***
***However, due to the volume of material to be reviewed, we will proceed with the Red Team Review -- but, subdivide it into a Primary Review (today) and a subsequent Follow-Up Review***
***Chairman to verbally consult with members and provide a verbal recommendation to GSFC Deputy Center Director as to how EO-1 should proceed with the final I&T***
***Each member will provide a written report to the chairman within six days of review***

## Red Team Schedule (continued)

***Red Team Schedule ****(continued)*

***The Follow-up Review will likely occur in Mid-May:***
***After final CPT (5/7-12/00) and before shipping (5/31/00)***
***Report on work finished after primary Red Team Review***
***Present any work not completed in first Review***
***Results of final CPT***
***Final closure of open paper***
***Readiness to ship and begin the launch campaign***
***Responses to RFAs from the Primary Red Team Review***

## Red Team Charter (1 of 3)

***Red Team Charter ****(1 of 3)*

***Basic Approach:***
***The mission is subdivided into mission elements***
***13 questions are then asked of each mission element as applicable***
***EO-1 Mission Elements:***

## Red Team Charter (2 of 3)

***Red Team Charter ****(2 of 3)*

***Thirteen Questions***
***1)***_***	***__***Verification Matrix***_*** of mission requirements***
***2)******	******Level and thoroughness to which the ***_***test and verification program***_*** was implemented***
***3)******	***_***Integration Test Results***_*** for the element***
***4)******	***_***Operating time***_*** -- total and failure-free ***
***5)******	******Amount, level, and fidelity of ***_***mission simulations and launch / operations training***_*** ***
***6)******	******Subsystem-level ***_***Failure Modes and Effects Analysis***_
***7)******	******Identify all ***_***single-point failures***_*** leading to mission failure***
***8)******	******Level, performance, and independence of ***_***system level reviews***_
***9)******	******Level, competence, and independence of ***_***technical peer reviews***_
***10)***_***	***__***Significant RFAs***_*** -- and their responses***
***11)******	******Level of ***_***product assurance***_*** that was imposed on the element***
***12)***_***	***__***Systems Management Approach***_*** imposed on the element***
***13)******	***_***Staffing and experience level***_*** of the element implementing organization***

## Red Team Charter (3 of 3)

***Red Team Charter ****(3 of 3)*

***Red Team Responsibilities:***
***Review EO-1 mission in terms of the likelihood of completing the validation requirements of the EO-1 Minimal Mission***
***Comment on the role of single string designs as a baseline for technology validation missions***
***Red Team’s estimate of the performance level achieved by the Project in meeting the 13 aspects of the developmental process***
***Provide recommendations to improve the status where the Red Team feels the Project’s performance is inadequate***
***Ascertain and document all residual risks judged to be higher than “low”***
***Assess all single-point failures and comment as to their acceptability***
***Comment on the use of FMEA, FTA, and PRA by the Project***
***Provide an overall risk statement***

## Compliance Approach

***Compliance Approach***

***Verification Matrix: ***
***Test and Verification Program:******	***
***Integration Test Results:***
***Operating Time:***
***Mission Simulations & Launch / Operations Training:***
***FMEA:***
***Single-Point Failures:***

***Presented initially in Section 7 (Verification Process) as a process with details being presented in each mission element***
***Presented by each mission element***
***Presented by each mission element including all significant test anomalies***
***Presented in Section 7 (Verification Process)***
***Presented in Section 33 (Operations)***
***Process presented in Section 3 (Residual Risk) and details presented in Section 35 (Residual Risk Associated with the EO-1 Minimal Mission) to be presented at the Red Team Follow-Up Review***
***Same as FMEA***

## Compliance Approach (continued)

***Compliance Approach ****(continued)*

***System-Level Reviews: ***
***Technical Peer Reviews:******	***
***Significant RFAs:***
***Product Assurance:***
***Systems Management Approach:***
***Staffing and Experience:***

***Presented in Section 4 (System Reviews)***
***Process discussed in Section 5 (Technical Reviews) and individual reviews presented in the mission elements***
***Presented by mission elements***
***Presented in Section 30 (Flight Assurance)***
***Presented by individual mission elements except for the spacecraft where it is consolidated into Section 13 (Spacecraft System Management Approach)***
***Staffing is presented in Section 6 (Staffing and Experience) and the level of experience is discussed in the individual mission elements.***

## Compliance Matrix

***Compliance Matrix***

***Compliance Matrix has been completed:***
***To demonstrate compliance with the Red Team Charter***
***To assist Red Team members in quickly finding relevant information***
***Fundamentally functions as a detailed index***
***Acronym list is also included***
***Provided as a separate document***

## AgendaDay 1

***Agenda******Day 1***

_***	***__***TIME***__***	***__***SECTION***__***	***__***TOPIC***__***	***__***	***__***PRESENTER***_
***	******8:00******	******1******	******Introduction ******	******B. Cramer***
*** ******	******8:20******	******2******	******Mission Overview******	******D. Schulz***
*** ******	******8:40******	******3******	******Residual Risk******	******B. Cramer***
*	**	**	*
***	******9:10******	******4******	******Systems Reviews******	******T. Klein****	**	*
***	******9:25******	******5******	******Technical Peer Reviews******	******P. Spidaliere***
*** ***
***	******9:40******	******6******	******Staffing and Experience******	******T. Klein***
***	******9:55******	******7******	******Verification Process******	******M. Perry ***
***	******	******	******Lunch Served***
***	***
***	******11:55******	******9******	******Flight Software******	******R. Whitley***
* *
***	******2:00******	******10******	******Advanced Land Imager ******	******C. Digenis***
***	******3:20******	******11******	******Hyperion******	******S. Carman***
***	******5:00******	******	******Adjourn******	***

## AgendaDay 2

***Agenda******Day 2***

_***	***__***TIME***__***	***__***SECTION***__***	***__***TOPIC***__***	***__***	***__***PRESENTER***_
***	******8:00******	******12******	******Atmospheric Corrector******	******D. Reuter***
***	******8:50******	******13******	******Spacecraft Systems Management Approach******	******M. Perry***
***	******9:25******	******14******	******Mechanical******	******P. Alea***
***	******10:25******	******15******	******Electrical******	******B. Zink***
***	******	******	******Lunch Served***
***	******1:25******	******16******	******Thermal******	******N. Teti***
***	******2:25******	******17******	******Power******	******	******A. Billings***
***	******3:45******	******18******	******Attitude Control System******	******P. Sanneman***
***	******7:15******	******	******Adjourn******	***

## AgendaDay 3

***Agenda******Day 3***

_***	***__***TIME***__***	***__***SECTION***__***	***__***TOPIC***__***	***__***	***__***PRESENTER***_
***	******8:00******	******19******	******Command & Data Handling******	******P. Luers***
***	******9:15******	******20******	******Communications******	******D. Charlson***
***	******10:55******	******21******	******Reaction Control System******	******M. McCullough***
***	******11:45******	******22******	******Wideband Advanced Recorder / Processor******	******T. Smith***
***	******	******	******Lunch Served***
***	******2:25******	******23******	******X-Band Phased Array Antenna******	******K. Perko***
***	******2:55******	******24******	******Lightweight Flexible Solar Array******	******J. Lyons***
***	******3:45******	******25******	******Pulse Plasma Thruster******	******C. Zakrzwski***
***	******4:30******	******26******	******Carbon-Carbon Radiator******	******G. Hobbs***
***	******5:00******	******27******	******Enhanced Formation Flying******	******D. Folta***
***	******5:40******	******28******	******Global Position System******	******D. Quinn***
***	***
***	******6:10******	******	******Adjourn******	***

## AgendaDay 4

***Agenda******Day 4***

_***	***__***TIME***__***	***__***SECTION***__***	***__***TOPIC***__***	***__***	***__***PRESENTER***_
***	******8:00******	******29******	******Contamination******	******M. Woronowicz***
***	******8:30******	******30******	******Flight Assurance******	******M. Kelly***
***	******10:00******	******31******	******Launch Vehicle******	******KSC***
***	******10:40******	******32******	******Launch Campaign******	******T. Gostomski***
***	***
***	******11:20******	******33******	******Operations / MOC******	******D. Mandl***
***	******	******	******Lunch Served***
***	******2:20******	******34******	******Validation of Mission Technologies******	******N. Speciale***
***	******2:50******	******36******	******Mission Readiness Status******	******D. Schulz***
***	******3:00******	******	******Adjourn******	***

## Where Are We Headed?

***Where Are We Headed?***

***EO-1 is a technology validation mission and not a small science mission***
***Fundamental differences:***
***Shorter life on orbit***
***Lesser dependence on flight data***
***Timing****** ***_***IS***_*** important relative to technology infusion opportunities***
***A single string design was a policy for EO-1 -- and that is what we built:***
***Less complex***
***Lower cost***
***Shorter schedule***
***BUT HIGHER RISK***
***Judge us as to the likelihood of validating the EO-1 Minimal Mission***
***How well have we managed our residual risks within existing constraints?***
***Is the aggregate residual risk commensurate with our validation objectives?***