# Presentation: 185426

## Challenges in Prediction of Summer Monsoon Rainfall:
Inadequacy of the Tier-2 Strategy

Bin Wang
Department of Meteorology and 
International Pacific Research Center 
University of Hawaii

Acknowledge co-authors
 X. Fu, Q. Ding,  University of Hawaii
I.-S. Kang, J-Y. Lee, K. Jin, Seoul National University
J. Shukla, COLA
F. Doblas-Meyes ECMWF

**Inadequacy of the Tier-2 Strategy**
**Bin Wang**
**Department of Meteorology and **
**International Pacific Research Center **
**University of Hawaii**
- Acknowledge co-authors
-  X. Fu, Q. Ding,  University of Hawaii
- I.-S. Kang, J-Y. Lee, K. Jin, Seoul National University
- J. Shukla, COLA
- F. Doblas-Meyes ECMWF

## SCIENTIFIC BASIS for climate prediction 

**SCIENTIFIC BASIS**** for ****climate prediction**** **
**	****The**** climate predictability is determined by variations of the ocean and land surface conditions. ****(Charney and Shukla 1981, Shukla 1998, Shukla et al. 2000).**
**Two –tier climate prediction system**
**	****Bengtsson, L., U. Schlese, E. Roeckner, M. Latif, T. Barnett****, and N. Graham, 1993: A two-tiered approach to long-range climate forecasting. *****Science*****, 261, 1026-1029. **
**	****Under the influence of slowly varying boundary forcing, the atmospheric model should be able to capture the predictable portion of tropical rainfall****.**

## Poor simulation of Indian monsoon rainfall (Sperber and Palmer 1996 

**Poor simulation of Indian monsoon rainfall (Sperber and Palmer 1996**** **
**Gadgil and Sajani 1998 )**
**Wang, Kang, Lee 2004, J. Climate**
**Conclusion:**
**	****The state-of-the-art atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs), when forced by observed sea surface temperature (SST), are unable to**** simulate with any accuracy Asian-Pacific summer monsoon rainfall. **
**	**

## 	CLIVAR/international monsoon panel AGCM intercomparisonAMIP type ensemble simulationObserved SST	Observed SST and sea ice as LB forcing11 AGCMs10-member ensemble2-year period (9/1996-8/1998)

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

##  A question of fundamental importance to climate simulation and prediction: 

** **
**Why are all AGCMs, when given the observed lower-boundary forcing, unable to simulate summer monsoon precipitation anomalies? Even with the extremely strong 1997/98 forcing!**
**Bad model climatology?**
**Bad tropical teleconnection?**
**Bad model physics?**
**Or something else!**

## Correlation coefficients between the local SST and precipitation anomalies that are observed (CMAP) or derived from the all-model comp (Comp) and from each model ensemble means. The computation was carried out for JJA97, SON97, and JJA98 and the three seasons as a whole using monthly mean data. 

## A major finding

**A major finding**
**	****All models tend to yield positive SST-rainfall correlations in the summer monsoon that are at odds with observations. **
**	****	**
**HYPOTHESIS**
**	**
**T****reating monsoon as a slave to prescribed SST results in the models’ failaure.**
**Or strategy is fundamentally wrong.**

## 	How well are the Asian summer monsoon rainfall hindcasted in the MME prediction? 

**	**
**	****APCN 5 participating models:**
**	****NCEP, NSIPP, JMA, KMA, SNU **
**	****MME: Multi-Model Ensemble**
**	**
**	**AMIP type ensemble hindcast
**	**6 to** **10-member ensemble
- 	21-year period (1979-2001)

## Correlation Coefficients between the observed and MME hindcasted June-August precipitations (1979-1999)

**Correlation Coefficients between the observed**** and MME hindcasted June-August precipitations (1979-1999)**

## Area averaged correlation coefficient skills

**Area averaged correlation coefficient skills**

## Obs. SST-Rainfall Correlation

** ****(a) Observation**

** ****(b) Multi-Model ensemble hindcast**

- MME SST-Rainfall correlation

## Observed Rainfall-SST correlation (1979-2002)

- Observed Rainfall-SST correlation (1979-2002)

- Rainfall
- Leads SST by 1-month

- SST leads Rainfall by
- 1-month

- Simultatious

## Coupled model Experiments

**IPRC Hybrid Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Model**
**Atmosphere: ECHAM4 T30 AGCM **
**Ocean:WLF intermediate ocean  model (0.5x0.5)**
**	****(Wang et al. 95, Fu and Wang 2001)**
**50 year integration**

**Contour indicates 95% significant level**

## WLF intermediate ocean  model (0.5x0.5)

- (Wang, Li, Chang 1995, JPO; Fu and Wang 2001, JC)

## Fig. 3

- (a)

- (b)

- C-1

- C-2

## Wavenumber-frequency spectra of MJO in boreal winter 

**Wavenumber-frequency spectra of MJO in boreal winter **
**             ****(NDJFMA) averaged from 10****o****S to 5****o****N **

## Fig.3

## Summary

**	****SSTA in heavy precipitating summer monsoon region is largely a result of atmospheric forcing. ****Treating monsoon as a slave to prescribed SST results in the models’ failure. **
**	****An AGCM, coupled with an ocean model, simulated realistic SST-rainfall relationships; however, the same AGCM fails when forced by the same SSTs that are generated in its coupled run. ****	**
**	****Neglect of atmospheric feedback makes the forced solution depart from the coupled solution in the presence of initial noises**** ****or tiny errors in the lower boundary. **
**	****C****oupled ocean-atmosphere processes are extremely important in the heavy precipitating monsoon convergence zones where the atmospheric feedback to SST is essential.**

## Implications

- 	The present finding calls for reshaping of current strategies for predicting monsoon climate and validating AGCMs.
- 	The Tier 2 approach where AGCM is forced by pre-forecasted SST is inadequate for predicting summer monsoon rainfall, especially in the Asian-Pacific region.
- 	The AMIP approach is inadequate in validating AGCM or determining upper limit of predictability of summer monsoon.

## AGCMs simulate climatology poorly over the WNP heat source region

**ISM **
- (5-30N, 65-105E)

**WNPSM**
- (5-25N, 110-150E)

## Slide 25

## (a) Correlation coefficients between the observed and simulated summer mean (JJA) precipitation anomalies during 1997 and 1998. The color shading denotes the correlation coefficients and the contours denote climatological seasonal mean rainfall rate (1979-98 CMAP climatology), and the green dashed line denotes the contour of seasonal mean 28oC SST (1971-2000 OISST climatology). 

**(a) Correlation coefficients between the observed and simulated summer mean (JJA) precipitation anomalies during 1997 and 1998. The ****color shading denotes the correlation coefficients and the contours denote climatological seasonal mean rainfall rate (1979-98 CMAP climatology), and the green dashed line denotes the contour of seasonal mean 28****o****C SST (1971-2000 OISST climatology). **
**(b) The same as in (a) except for the correlation coefficients between observed SST and simulated precipitation anomalies during JJA 1997 and 1998. The contour denotes the significance level with 99% confidence level (0.17).**

## Slide 27