BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 657668

## USDA-EPA Proposal on    Land Based Pollution    October 2002, Puerto Rico

**                  *****Update:***
**USDA-EPA Proposal on    Land Based Pollution****    ****October 2002, Puerto Rico**

## USDA-EPA Proposal

** ****USDA & EPA co-lead effort to address**
**     ****LBP, using existing tools for pollution**
**     ****control**
**  ****Form a Planning Committee**
**3.  Co-host regional workshops in Pacific &**
**       ****Caribbean/Atlantic**
***	***

**USDA-EPA Proposal**

***	******	******	******Purpose:***** **
**	**Coalesce on-going local efforts
- 	Support local jurisdictions to develop &	  	          implement Local Action Strategies

## Pacific Land-based Pollution (LBP) Planning Committee

**Pacific Land-based Pollution (LBP) ****Planning Committee**

**EPA Region 9**
**NRCS Hawaii and Guam**
**Guam**
**CNMI**
**Hawaii**
**American Samoa**

## Pacific Regional Workshop on Coral Reefs and Land Based Pollution

- June 23-24, 2003 Field trip and Workshop in    Honolulu
- Held in conjunction with Climate Change                                     Workshop and  EPA’s Annual Pacific Islands Environmental Conference
-  Over 100 attended

## Pacific Regional LBP Workshop

***Topics Discussed:***
**Impacts of pollutants on Pacific coral reefs**
**Understanding and managing pollutant inputs**
**Local Action Strategies to reduce impacts**
**Success stories**
**Funding, common needs, and next steps**

**Larry Yamamoto, USDA**

**Wayne Nastri, EPA**

## Common Needs Identified at Workshop

- Enforcement of existing environmental laws
- Increase local government capacity
- Training local technical staff
- Improved monitoring tools for
-    assessing pollutant impacts & trigger
-    levels for regulating sediments
- Improve outreach and education
-    to diverse ethnic groups

## Field Trip at Kaneohe Bay

**Field Trip at Kaneohe Bay**

**Visit Labs at Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology **

**Snorkel in patch reefs dominated by non-native macroalgae**

## Invasive Algae in Kaneohe Bay

***Kappaphycus spp******.***

## Next Steps for Land Based Pollution

-   Present LAS’s to Pacific Regional
-     Subcommittee at CRTF
-   Support for implementation
-   Atlantic/Caribbean workshop

##     Website for Pacific Regional Workshop on Land Based Pollution

*www.epa.gov/r09/x_pr/islands/conferences.html*

-     Website for Pacific Regional Workshop on Land Based Pollution
# Presentation: 664387

## <date/time>

## Session 47

**EDExpress:**
**"Give Us Your Feedback"**

- Session 47-

## EDExpress:"Give Us Your Feedback"

- 	**Introduction**
**      **
**	**Who are we?
**	****	**
**	**What is our role?

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

**Who are the “partners”?**
- Department of Education
- Contractors who develop the software
- Schools & Servicers who use the software
- Vendors who use the software

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

-    Requirements
-    Development
-    Testing
-    Distribution

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

**STEP 1 -- Requirements**
- What was carried over from last year?
- What changes in the law or regulations need to be incorporated?
- What feedback have we received?
- What did we learn from Focus Groups?
-   Continued

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

**STEP 2 -- Development**
- Based on agreed upon Requirements, Development begins
- Each trading partner develops the software changes agreed upon

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

**STEP 3 -- Testing**
- Development Testing
- CPS Customer Service Testing
- Subcontractor Testing
- ED Acceptance Testing
- Beta Testing
- Regression Testing

- Session 47-

## The Four Steps in the Life Cycle

**Step 4 -- Distribution**
- Distribution via SFA Download WEB site
- Cover Letter
- Installation Guide
- Software
- Technical Reference and Update pages
- Desk References

- Session 47-

## Release Schedule

-  Application Processing/Global	Dec, 2001
-  Packaging					Dec, 2001
-  QA Tool					Jan, 2002
-  Direct Loan 				Mar, 2002
-  Pell						Mar, 2002
-  DL Tools					Jun, 2002

- Session 47-

## What Role Can Schools Play in the Process?

- Current role
- Focus Groups
- Beta Review of Technical Reference
- Beta Testing
- Enhanced User Involvement
- Usability Testing
- Requirements documentation review
- Sign Up NOW!!!!

- Session 47-

## ED/NCS Pearson Listens

- Now we’d like
-  to hear your
-      ideas!!!

- Session 47-

## Topics for Discussion	

- Make it a web product
- How do you envision this?
- Where would you want your database?
- Which pieces would you want first, if it was in a “rollout” phase?
- What problems do you foresee?

- Session 47-

## Topics for Discussion	

- Documentation
- Installation Guides
- Technical References
- Desk References
- Help Text
- New Distribution Plan
- Downloadable/view on-line
- On or about the 15th of each month

- Session 47-

## ED Listens

-   We appreciate your feedback and comments.  We can be reached:
- Email:	          						**ginger.klock@ed.gov**
**	****	****susan_burwell@ncs.com**

- Session 47-
# Presentation: 717516

## 2003 CFC WorkshopAlbuquerque, NM

**Campaign Events**
**Small Campaigns**

## 		  Presenters

- 		  _**Presenters**_

**     “****Goldie” Goldfein, Campaign Director**
**          ****Northern/Southern Nevada CFC**
**                                    ****&**
**  ****John Scott, Chair Southern Nevada LFCC**
**    ****District Director, Small Business Admin.  **

## “When looking for a helping hand try the end of your own arm first”

**“****Be approximately right all the time and you will be well ahead of   those waiting for perfection!”**
**  “****Use your staff for most tasks!”**

_** **__**Slogans and Sayings**_

## What are Campaign Events?

**Key Activities that allow contact with Federal donors and keyworkers.**
**Activities that allow agencies a vital opportunity to produce generous giving during agency fun occasions.**
**Provides an opportunity to thank donors during and at the end of CFC.**
**	**

##                        Checklist

**  ****Produce a plan**
**  ****Calendarize the “to do’s”**
**  ****Assign a Project Person to each**
**  ****Manage/monitor  and ”nag”**
**  ****Log “dones” & capture “corrects”**
**  ****Give copious credit where due**

## Examples of  CFC Events

-  **CFC Kick-Off ( LFCC-sponsored)**
** ****Carnivals/Fairs – BBQ/Cookout/Games**
** ****Blind Auctions/Incentive awards-trips**
** ****Raffles, Bowl-a-thons, Car Washes**
** ****Gas Pumping, organizational events**
** ****Key-worker Training Luncheon**
** ****Athletic competitions, etc.**
** ****Inter-office competitions - one v. one**
** ****Bake sales – agency luncheon events, etc.**
** “****Thank You” Closing Event(s)**

##        Brainstorm Session

**Your ideas!**
**           ****Your great events!**
**                         ****Your *****losers*****!**

## Contact Information

**    “****Goldie” Goldfein, Campaign Director**
**     ****Northern/Southern Nevada CFC 2003**
**2008 Faywood Street, Las Vegas, NV 89134**
**  ****Phone:  702-233-8765  Fax: 702-243-5635**
**                 ****Email:  rube@juno.com**

##         Contact Information (Continued)      

**      ****John Scott, Chair Southern NV CFC**
**  ****District Director, Small Business  Admin.**
**  ****400 South 4****th**** Street, Las Vegas, NV 89101**
**  ****Phone:  702-388-6019  Fax:  702-388-6469**
**           ****Email:  john.e.scott@sba.gov**
# Presentation: 929018

## The Plasmaspheric Shoulder

**The Plasmaspheric Shoulder**

**Daniel Ober**
**Dennis Gallagher**

## Shoulder

## Slide 3

## Studies From the ’60s and ’70s

- Previous studies have observed a pattern of localized westward followed by eastward convection electric fields following storm onset.
- This is found through whistler measurements of nightside radially inward, then outward, convection of the plasmapause.

## Slide 5

## Wiemer Electric Field Model

## Electric Potential Pattern in the Equatorial Magnetosphere

- Kp = 8

- 0300 UT
- May 24

- Westward electric field

## Equipotential Contours

## Plasmasphere Model Setup

- Electric field:
- 	Used modified Sojka et al [JGR, 1986] two-cell convection pattern with additional substorm related electric field.  Electric field strength parameterized by Kp.  Substorm electric field on for 1 hour (0300-0400 UT).
- Magnetic field:
- 	Tsyganenko T96 magnetic field model.
- Model is driven by actual Kp index.

## Electric Potential Patterns in the Equatorial Magnetosphere

- Kp = 2

- Kp = 8

- Kp = 5

- 1200 UT
- May 23

- 0300 UT
- May 24

- 1200 UT
- May 24

## Plasmasphere Model Results

- 0400 UT

- 0800 UT

- 1200 UT

## Modeled Plasmasphere

- Observed Plasmasphere

## So Where Do We Go?

- How can shoulder formation mechanism be confirmed?
- Voids: formation? And filling?
- Fingers: voids?
- Small-scale structures?
- Reduced density channel formation?
- H+/He+ ratio? PP?

- Reduce numerical diffusion
- PS – Ring current interaction
- PS – Superthermal electron population interaction
- Meso-scale ionospheric sources and losses
- Electric fields

**Domination of What**

**Domination of How**
# Presentation: 705411

## Information Exchange

**Package Documentation (IEPD)**
**Clearinghouse**

- Christopher Traver, Technical Advisor
- BJA/OJP/USDOJ
- May 17th, 2006
- christopher.traver@usdoj.gov / 202-307-2963

## IEPD Clearinghouse Overview

- The Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD) Clearinghouse provides information on a variety of IEPDs that have been submitted by individuals and organizations who have implemented the Global Justice XML Data Model (Global JXDM).
- While this site provides descriptive information about IEPDs, it does not contain the actual IEPDs and associated artifacts (ex. documents, schema, etc.). To locate and download the actual IEPDs and artifacts, refer to the Web site listed under each IEPD information article.
- Users can submit IEPD information by downloading the IEPD submission template
- Users can contact GJXDM Help Desk for further assistance
- This IEPD Information site is GTTAC sponsored initiative supported by Bureau of Justice Administration and IJIS Institute

## IEPD Clearinghouse Home

## IEPD Information Search

## IEPD Details

## IEPD Information Site Resources

- _[http://it.ojp.gov/iepd](http://it.ojp.gov/iepd)_
- If you need additional support GJXDM help desk can be contacted via:
-  Web: By clicking "Ask a Question" tab at _[http://it.ojp.gov/gjxdm/helpdesk/](http://it.ojp.gov/gjxdm/helpdesk/)__ _
-  Telephone: 1-877-333-5111 or 703-726-1919
-  Email: gjxdmhelp@ijis.org

## Demonstration

- _[http://www.it.ojp.gov/iepd](http://www.it.ojp.gov/iepd)_
# Presentation: 891776

## Columbia, MissouriMarch 16, 2004

- James H. Ware
- Soil Survey Division

## Director’s Goals

- Support MLRA Project Office Structure
- Support MLRA Office Structure
- Support States Technical Soil Services
- Support NSSC and National Leaders
- Support NCGC - Soil Support Branch
- Support SSURGO Initiative
- 1727 Certified (3/1/04)

## Director’s Goals

- Support NITC
- Populate Geospatial Data Warehouse
- Needs to be Populated by December 30, 2004
- House for “ALL” Official Soil Data
- One House for all Soil Applications
- Spatial (SSURGO) and Tabular (NASIS)
- Eliminate Publication Backlog (QIT Report)

## Director’s Goals

- Publication “Web Soil Survey” Data Mart
- Utilize West Texas Project as prototype
- Include Web SDV (GIS and Reports capable)
- Include tabular and map unit information
- Customized Soil Survey by user
- Options for output
- Examples – Print, write to CD, download, or         re-access online
- http://hydric.itc.nrcs.usda.gov/websoilsurvey/

## Slide 5

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Director’s Goals

- Publication “Web Soil Survey” Data Mart (cont.)
- Prototype by Dec 19, 2004
- Phase I   – June 2004
- Phase II  – November 2004
- Phase III – November 2005
- NASIS Next Generation
- Soil Data Viewer/Web Data Viewer/Resource Data Viewer

## Director’s Goals

- Raise the Bar in How we do Soil Survey using New Technology
- Provide More and Better Technical Soil Services (Internal & External Customers)
- Examine Ways to Provide a Better Statistical Based Soil Survey

## Director’s Goals

- Implement New Technology in Soil Survey
- Tool Box for Soils
- On-Screen editing using ARCGIS
- Utilize 3D Mapper software
- Test and Implement SoLIM (Soil Landscape Inference Model)
- Support Dynamic Soil Properties
- Reaffirm & Strengthen NCSS Partnership

## Director’s Goals

- Reaffirm & Strengthen NCSS Partnership
- Establish NCSS Cooperator Award
- Re-Vitalize NCSS Advisory Group

## National Geospatial and Development Center

- Establish National Geospatial Development Center (NGDC)
- Finalizing MOU and Cooperative Ecosystems Study Unit (CESU-Agreement) with West Virginia Univ.
- Primary Function is Research & Test Concepts with Business Analysis
- Look into Future & Develop New GIS/Geospatial Tools for Soil Scientists & Others

## National Geospatial and Development Center

- Establish NRCS Director (Christine Clarke-Acting) & Three Branch Leaders
- Spatial Applications
- Application Integration (databases & programs)
- Technology Integration & Delivery (Soils, NRI, Tool Kit, etc.)
- Marketing Soils Information
- Web Based
- Utilize University, Private Contractors & NRCS personnel

## Closing

- Thank You
- 		Thank You
- 			Thank You
- Questions ???
- 		Questions  ???
- 			Questions ???
# Presentation: 569697

## Applications of Thin Polyimide Films to X-ray OpticsLuxel CorporationFriday Harbor, WA

**ACCOMPLISHMENTS**
- Freestanding polyimide films can be made from 500Å to 40,000Å thick with great (±5%) film uniformity.
- Polyimide films are readily metalized to provide x-ray filter transmission in the bandpass range of choice from soft x-ray to EUV.
- Polyimide films’ optical and mechanical properties are characterized such that films may be designed for specific pressure and transmission applications.
- Polyimide films only 2500Å thick hold one atmosphere of pressure.
**COMMERCIALIZATION**
- Nearly spherical 2.75mm gas-filled targets (gasbags) that inflate to hold 16 psi of pressure for inertial confinement fusion research total sales of $0.5M since 1995.
- Laser target entrance windows that hold pressure used by the National Ignition Facility are estimated to reach $0.6M annually within 5-6 years.
- Neutral density filters for the infrared supported on thin polyimide films have been supplied to the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) for sale as the reference standard. The market is estimated to be $0.6M annually.
- A cooperative agreement is being developed to supply detector windows to a scanning electron microscope manufacturer.

**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation**
**R****esearch**

- 1991 Phase II, SS5-018, 12/4/98

**GOVERNMENT SCIENCE/APPLICATIONS**
- Fifteen different spacecraft astronomy missions have procured aluminized polyimide filters, including two AXAF instruments and the ASTRO-E X-Ray Spectrometer.
- A 1997 NASA SBIR supported additional research into optimization of polyimide films for operation at cryogenic temperature.  Feasibility of fabricating sub-micron polyimide film to increase its strength at cryogenic temperatures was demonstrated.

**Goddard Space Flight Center**

**INNOVATION**
- Fabrication processes have been developed for ultra-thin freestanding polyimide films.  The films are optimized to provide robust x-ray filter substrates.

- Points of Contact:
- 	-  NASA - Ritva Keski-Kuha; 301-286-6706
- 	-  Luxel Corporation - Forbes Powell; 360-378-4137
- 		                URL:  www.luxel.com

***Freestanding Polyimide and Metalized Polyimide Filters ***
# Presentation: 689063

## IMPROVED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT WILL BETTER SERVE YOUR STUDENTS

- Clarence M. Hicks

**Session**** 20**

## Special Initiatives Services

**Historically Black Colleges and Universities**
**Hispanic Serving Institutions**
**Tribal Colleges and Universities**

## HOW DO WE HELP YOU?

**Tools currently available on IFAP can maximize the efficiency of the Staff in maintaining compliance with federal regulations:**
**Federal Student Aid Assessments**
**Federal Student Aid Coach**
**Common Origination & Disbursement **

##    PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

**This year the SIS Unit sponsored workshops specifically tailored to address the needs of the Financial Aid and Business Office staff at HBCUs.**

## PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

- HBCUs informed SIS that more training was needed on:
- Default Prevention
- Default Prevention Plan
- Liquidation of Federal Perkins Loans
- Conflicting Information
- Verification

## PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

- FSA’s Default Prevention and Management Office team held a workshop in Puerto Rico designed specifically for the Hispanic-Speaking Institutions.  The workshop included a default prevention component and reiterated the school’s responsibility to reduce delinquency and default among borrowers.

## PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

**SIS participated in a day-long session for HSIs on Conflicting Information/Verification. **

## PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

**Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCU’s) received updated information on compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) with respect to protecting the privacy of student education records.**

## FUTURE PARTNERSHIP WORKSHOPS

- Workshops exclusively geared toward Business Officers.
- This training will ensure that these professionals are equipped with the information they need to be fiscally sound administrators of Title IV funds.

## SIS Staff

- Clarence M. Hicks, Director
- 202 377 4357
- 202 275 5512 (fax)
- clarence.hicks @ed.gov
- Demetrius Bellizaire
- 202 377 4365
- 202 275 5512 (fax)
- demetrius.bellizaire@ed.gov

- Larry B. Eadie
- 404 562 6264
- 404 562 6283 (fax)
- _[larry.eadie@ed.gov](mailto:larry.eadie@ed.gov)_
- Raul M. Galvan
- 214 661 9455
- 214 661 9662 (fax)
- _[raul.galvan@ed.gov](mailto:raul.galvan@ed.gov)_

## SIS Staff

- Columbus “Chris” Lee
- 404 562 6268
- 404 562 6283 (fax)
- _[columbus.lee@ed.gov](mailto:columbus.lee@ed.gov)_
- Esther R. Ross
- 206 615 2017
- 206 615 3644 (fax)
- esther.ross@ed.gov

- Ronald G. Selepak
- 202 377 4381
- 202 275 5512 (fax)
- ronald.selepak@ed.gov
# Presentation: 317629

## Saintes-Maries de la Mer, France

June 11, 12 & 13, 2003

**Saintes-Maries de la Mer, France**
**June 11, 12 & 13, 2003**

**ARGOS NEXT**

## ARGOS NEXT GROUND SEGMENT ELEMENTS

**1. ARGOS PROCESSING CENTERS**

**All the Following Modifications were Successfully Tested during On-Orbit Test Phase:**

** ****File Exchanges with the ADEOS II Ground Segment**

** ****ADEOS II/Argos DCS Level 0 Data and HK Telemetry Processing**

** ****Processing of Argos Messages Relating to the Downlink Messaging**

** ****28 Bit ID Numbers**

** ****ADEOS II Spacecraft Maneuvers**

## Slide 3

## FIRST PERFORMACE RESULTS OF LEVEL 0 DATA DISPOSAL TIMES

**STORED DATA: 94% of the Data Within 3 hours**

**REAL-TIME DATA: 87% of the Data Within 40 Minutes**

***“******SINCE MAY 5, 2003 ALL THE ARGOS PROCESSING CENTERS ARE PROCESSING AND DELIVERING, ON AN OPERATIONAL BASIS, THE ARGOS/ADEOS II DCS DATA TO THE CUSTOMERS”***

## 2. DOWNLINK MESSAGE MANAGEMENT CENTER (DMMC)

**DMMC ROLE IS TO CENTRALIZE, VALIDATE AND SCHEDULE DOWNLINK MESSAGE REQUESTS FROM USERS BEFORE XMITTING THEM TO THE SATELLITE**

**TOULOUSE (late 2002) – LARGO (mid-2004)**

**TESTING NEARLY COMPLETE – SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO BETA TESTERS IN 3Q 2003 AND TO EVERYONE SOON AFTERWARD**

## 3. MASTER BEACONS

**TOULOUSE - *****OPERATIONAL***

**HATOYAMA - *****OPERATIONAL***

**FAIRBANKS – *****REPAIR SCHEDULED  FOR JUNE 2003***

***NO MORE BEACONS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED***

## 4. PLATFORM MESSAGING TRANSCEIVER (PMT)

** ****BATHY SYSTEMS, INC**

** ****USES IESM RCVR**

** ****PROTOTYPES COMPLETED IN EARLY SUMMER 2003**

**50 UNITS PLANNED IN SEPTEMBER FOR INITIAL APPLICATIONS – *****DRIFTERS, FLOATS***

**OTHER MANUFACTURERS SHOWING INTEREST: *****IESM, TOYOCOM, SEIMAC***
# Presentation: 091680

## Charlie CatlettArgonne National Laboratory12:15pm – 12:45pm

- The I-WIRE Optical Networking Testbed Infrastructure

- “The Illinois Wired/Wireless Infrastructure for Research and Education, or I-WIRE, is a project funded by the State of Illinois to put in place a dark fiber network in the Chicago area and extending to Champaign-Urbana.  The purpose of the network is to support high-performance distributed applications, middleware research, and network research.  As of January 2002 fiber is in place to over half of the planned 11 sites, with the remaining sites expected  by Marhy 2002.  In this same timeframe a Dense Wave Division Multiplexing (DWDM) transport system will be deployed on the fiber capable of delivering up to 66 channels per pair of fiber, each running at up to 10 Gb/s.  I-WIRE's first use will be to connect the participating institutions to Starlight, a high performance optical network interconnect in Chicago, and to support a 40 Gb/s national network connecting Argonne, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA, at U of I Urbana), Caltech, and the San Diego Supercomputer Center.  This talk will provide an overview of the technology being used and the I-WIRE research agenda.”

## I-WIRE Background

- State Funded Dark Fiber Optical Infrastructure to support Networking and Applications Research
- $7.5M Total Funding
- $4M FY00-01 (in hand)
- $2.5M FY02 (approved 1-June-01)
- Additional $0.5M each in FY03, FY04
- Application Driven
- Access Grid: Telepresence & Media
- Computational Grids: Internet Computing
- Data Grids: Information Analysis
- New Technologies Proving Ground
- Optical Switching
- Dense Wave Division Multiplexing
- Ultra-High Speed SONET
- Wireless
- Advanced middleware infrastructure

## I-WIRE Topology

## 13.6 TF Linux TeraGrid

## I-WIRE Fiber (Logical) Connectivity

## I-Wire Logical and Transport Topology

## I-WIRE Fiber Planned Extensions

## I-WIRE Partnership Expansion Plans

## Questions...

- The I-WIRE Optical Networking Testbed Infrastructure
# Presentation: 755176

## The North American Monsoon System: Recent Evolution and Current Status

**Update prepared by**
**Climate Prediction Center / NCEP**
**   ****22 September 2008**

## Outline

** ****Recent Evolution and Current Conditions**
** ****Summary**
** ****Climatology**

## Rainfall Patterns: Last 7 Days

**Rainfall Patterns: Last 7 Days**

**Slightly above-normal rainfall was observed over northwestern Mexico during the past week, while southwest U.S. received near-normal precipitation. **

## Rainfall Patterns: Last 30 Days

**Rainfall Patterns: Last 30 Days**

**During the past 30 days,**** ****near–normal precipitation has been observed over southwest U.S. while above-normal precipitation was seen for most areas of northern and central Mexico.**

## Recent Evolution: Rainfall

**Recent Evolution: Rainfall**

- Near-normal precipitation in southwest US and slightly above-normal precipitation in northwest Mexico during the past week

## Summary

**Slightly above-normal rainfall was observed over northwestern Mexico during the past week, while southwest U.S. received near-normal precipitation.**

## ClimatologyMONSOON ONSET

-  **June 5**

**June 6**

**June 6**

**June 8**

**June 7**

**June 14**

**June 14**

**June 17**

**June 16**

**June 23**

**June 27**

**June 25**

**June 29**

**July 3**

**July 6**

**July 11**

**July 7**

**July 8**

**July 13**

**July 9**

**July 13**

**July 14**

**June 10**

**June 11**

**June 22**

**June 21**

**Higgins, R. W., Y. Chen and A. V. Douglas, 1999:  Interannual Variability of the North American Warm Season Precipitation Regime.  J. Clim, 17, 653-680**

## Precipitation Climatology
# Presentation: 199042

## NASA                          SENTEL

-                        John Lekki                               Kevin Jackson
-                       Darcy Miller

## Agenda

- Purpose
- Participants
- Current and Future Operations
- System Development
- System Overview
- Demonstration

## Purpose

- Provide a system for executing Work Procedures electronically.
- Electronic stamping
- Electronic signatures
- Permanent Data Record
- http://www.ksc.nasa.gov/payload/projects/qapdc

## Participants

- NASA
- SENTEL
- Boeing - Rocketdyne
- Boeing
- Auburn University

## <footer>

- <date/time>

## Benefits

**All task team members see changes to document instantly** (Deviations, Quality buy-offs, document closures, signatures, etc.)  Team is informed.  Assures data accuracy.
**Deviations will be incorporated directly into document** rather than just attachments.  Improves accuracy of operation.  Processing, approving, and distributing deviations is done electronically.

## Benefits (Con’t)

**Improves information availability**** **for incident investigations and management reporting.
**Eliminates need to carry multiple stamps and ink pads.**
**Emergency procedures** can be accessed immediately.
**Future savings** may be realized by using the data in statistical analysis to identify and implement process improvements.

## System Development

- SENTEL:
- Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Contract with SENTEL Corporation (5/93-5/96)
- Technology 2006 Trade Show - Received NASA SBIR Technology of the year award for computers/software. (10/96)
- Space Act Agreement - NASA and SENTEL Partnership (7/97)
- Auburn University:
- Usability Study on Prototype (8/97)
- Final Usability Study (8/98)

## System Development - Con’t

- Boeing - Rocketdyne
- Pilot Test in Space Shuttle Main Engine Shop (1/98 to present)
- Boeing:  Testing in Space Station (8/98)
- Provide Operational System to Space Station on  (11/98)

## System Overview

- Work
- Document

**Document**
**Conversion**

- NASA

- Database

- (Word
- Processor)

**Execution**

**Portable Data**
**Terminal**

- Sentel

- Task Data
- in Database

**Report**
**Generation**

- NASA

- Report,
- Archival
- Database

**Stamp**
**Admin-**
**istration**

- NASA

## System Description

## Demonstration

- by SENTEL

## End
# Presentation: 497782

## 14th  Semiconducting and Insulating Materials Conference SIMC-14  Sponsored by the OU-UA MRSEC

- The Oklahoma-Arkansas MRSEC hosted the14th SIMC conference which engaged international participation from a diverse group of more than 30 nations. The technical sessions presented over 5 days with parallel sessions encompassed the transfer of many new and developing ideas, and the talks received the highest evaluation as indicated by the  results of the conference survey.

***Sponsored by ***
***C-SPIN ***
***the OU-UA MRSEC***
- DMR-0520550
# Presentation: 725379

## Marketing and Dissemination Activities

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES**
**Centers for Disease Control and Prevention**
**National Center for Health Statistics**

**Marketing and Dissemination Activities**

## Products and Services

- Published reports

## Dissemination Products

**Electronic data products**

**Dissemination Products**

## Slide 4

## Dissemination Products

## Channels to Reach Data Users 

**Public Inquiries Line**
**Website**
**Mailing lists**
**Exhibits**
**Conferences**
**Workshops**
**Questionnaires, survey methodology, data system source information, metadata**

## Dissemination

**Dissemination**

**Full-service data inquiry program**
**(301) 458-INFO**
**1-866-441-NCHS**

## The NCHS Internet Site

**The NCHS Internet Site**

**Users report high satisfaction with site overall**
**Site is useful, well organized, and it’s easy to find what**
**	****you are looking for**
**Satisfied with listservs**
**	****and pdfs**
**Dissatisfied with the**
**	****search engine**

## NCHS Web Trends Data 2003

- Total number of visits	**14,000,000**

- Average visits per day		  **38,000**

## Total number of visits
Frequently visited sites
Downloadable files
Visits by country

**Frequently visited sites**
**Downloadable files**
**Visits by country**

**NCHS Web Trends Data**** 2003**

## How Do You Plan to Use the Material on This Site?

**June 2000 – February 2003**

**Reference**

**Complete/complement**
**other information**

**Provide data**
**to others**

**Other***

**Personal**
**interest**

**Prepare articles,**
**studies, or papers**

**Make decisions**
**and/or set policy**

*** Others include teaching, marketing,**
**   ****and obtaining vital records**

## Premiere marketing and dissemination tool
10-15 major public health and statistical conferences per year
Conferences chosen based on consultations with NCHS statistical programs

**10-15 major public health and statistical conferences per year**
**Conferences chosen based on consultations with NCHS statistical programs**

**NCHS Exhibit Program**

## Slide 13
# Presentation: 667704

## BRAHMS Run5 pp Status

- DAQ time in the previous week: F/S/S/M : 1.5/9.2/13.9/10.3 hours
- Main physics goal: single spin transverse asymmetry at high-xF
-  - To meet the physics goal: 5pb-1 (delivered) with pol.≥45%
-  - FS at 2.3 deg. at full field setting for AN(±): Done
-  - FS 4 deg. at full field for A at high-pT (2.5-3.5 GeV/c): Done
-  - FS 3+2.3 deg. at full field for AN(-) at high-xF (0.35-0.45): Current
-  - AN (K±) at 2.3 deg. A/B-pol: ~1.5 Week

**BRAHMS Run5 pp Status**

**ZDC/sec**

## 1.67 pb-1 recorded since April 17th

**1.67 pb****-1**** recorded since April 17****th**
**1.67/2.5 = 67% of goal (83% of FOM Goal)**
- Calculated by min-bias trigger (“CC trigger”)
-  covering ~70% of pp inelastic cross-section
- Goal Assumed: Recorded/Delivered ~0.5
- Blue Polarization ~ 50%

- Goal with Pol~50%

- Goal
# Presentation: 746696

## Slide 1

## Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service

**Impact on**
**Labor-Management Relations 2004**

## F.M.C.S. Creation

**Independent agency under Taft-Hartley amendments in 1947.**
**Resolve collective bargaining disputes which threaten the free flow of commerce.**
**Neither a regulatory nor an enforcement agency, but a neutral designed to assist Labor & Management.**

## F.M.C.S. Mission

**Promote sound & stable L/M relations.**
**Prevent/minimize work stoppages through mediation assistance to parties.**
**Advocate collective bargaining, mediation & voluntary arbitration.**
**Develop the art, science & practice of conflict resolution.**
**Foster constructive joint L/M processes.**

## F.M.C.S. Services

**Dispute Mediation**
**Private, Public, & Federal Sectors**
**Preventive Mediation**
**Customized training**
**Education, Outreach & Advocacy**
**Of collective bargaining processes**

**Alternative Dispute Resolution**
**In-lieu of litigation**
**Arbitration Services**
**L/M Grants**
**International Program**
**Youth violence prevention**

## Mediation Defined

**The use of a third-party neutral **
**to assist the parties in conflict**
**resolution.**

## Dispute Mediation

**2004 U.S. Statistics**
**20,249 contract assignments**
**5,136 closed (active)**
**76 % closed/agrmt.**
**273 work stoppages (all size B.U.’s)**

## Work Stoppages(U.S.)(all size bargaining units)

##   Hot Topics at the Table

**Job Security**
**Subcontracting**
**Off-shore job losses**
**Staffing issues**
**Healthcare industry**
**Mandatory O/T**
**State legislation**

**Pension Benefits**
**Defined benefits vs. defined contributions**
**Wages / Benefits**
**Approx. 3%**
**Slightly lower in Mfg., slightly higher in Constr.**
_**Health Insurance**_
**Rx plan costs**
**Co-pays & cost sharing**
**Plan design**
**MSA’s**

## Preventive Mediation

**2004 U.S. Statistics**
**Active in 2,632 joint training/process cases**
**Has grown to over 30% of mediation caseload**

## Alternative DisputeResolution

**2004 U.S. Statistics**
**Active in 1,591 cases**
**(+591.7 % since 1995)**
**Increasing number of Reg-Neg’s, public policy, employment mediations**

## A.D.R. Growth(U.S.)

##   Common reasons for not reaching agreement

**Ineffective communications**
**Inaccurate info./data**
**Personalities/emotion**
**Morals differ**

**Internal/external political pressure**
**Un-realistic expectations (economic, status, etc.)**
**Perception of “Fair”**
**Pride**

## Why mediation can be an effective tool for conflict resolution

**Parties retain control of resolution**
**Voluntary (in most cases)**
**Informal vs. formal process**
**Time efficient**
**Cost effective**

## When mediation may not be appropriate

**Pre-determined, inflexible positions**
**When a “directed” decision is sought**
**“****Principals”**

## Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service

**Robert S. Ditillo**
**Commissioner**
**One Oxford Centre, Suite 2570**
**301 Grant Street**
**Pittsburgh, PA 15219**
**412-644-4110**
**rditillo@fmcs.gov**
# Presentation: 817631

## Integrated Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Peak Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Initial Luminosity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Protons to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbars to Collision

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

- 150 GeV Lifetime
- Parse the Squeeze (tune up)
- Collimators (no beam available)
- 36 X 12 to test new Helix

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

**Store #1128**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

**First 36 X 12**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Tevatron Studies Summary

**Most recent 36 X 12**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies Summary

- New lattice IBS studies
- Pbar stack moved to central orbit
- change the lattice
- compare heating rates
- Conclusions;
- The 4-D and 6-D phase space products showed almost a factor of 3 lower emittance and growth rate
- The initial conditions between the current lattice and the study lattice were not the same, another study needed

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies Summary

**Transverse Heating terms**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies Summary

**Transverse Heating Rates**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## Pbar Studies Summary

**6-D Phase Space Growth Rate**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

- Beam loading compensation
- Transverse emittance (growth) vs. Booster intensity

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

**Beam loading Compensation on Station 2**

**Beam loading Compensation on Station 1**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

**Horizontal Emittance at 150 GeV for 8 Booster Turns vs # of Bunches**

- All Experimenters Meeting

## MI Studies Summary

**7.5 MHz Coalescing for RR Injection**

- All Experimenters Meeting
# Presentation: 169144

## Douglas County, CO. Flash Flood Warning

**Notes:**
Hayman fire burn area.  Reverse 911 calls alerted those in the warning...along West Creek between Deckers and Westcreek.

## Flood Definition NWSI 10-1605

- 7.13 **Flash Flood (C). **A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a
- rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood level, beginning within
- six hours of the causative event (e.g., intense rainfall, dam failure, ice jam-related). Ongoing
- flooding can intensify to flash flooding in cases where intense rainfall results in a rapid surge of
- rising flood waters.

## Summary Points

- How can we better anticipate heavy rain and flash floods?
- Reserve FFW for life threatening events
- FFW may be overused...possible solution:
- Use TOP BP of Flash Flood Emergency
- Apply to low water crossings
- Provide support at EOC

## Summary Points

- Provide information you have that customers should also have.
- Outreach will be increasingly important
- Are WCMs involved in dam break exercises?
- Be proactive with USGS contacts particularly around July 1 (state FY) and Oct 1 (federal FY)

## Summary Points

- Dam break points
- Most likely failure will not be due to rain/flood
- Highly visible...need to be prepared
- Post someone at EOC
# Presentation: 717519

## The P-4 NSABP Trial:  NCAB Subcommittee Recommendations

- Bruce A. Chabner, MD
- June 16, 2007

## Prior NCI-Sponsored Breast Cancer Prevention Trials

- P-1: Tam vs Placebo. 13,388 women, Gail Risk 1.67 or higher.
- 49% reduction in invasive breast cancer over 5 yrs (3.3% vs. 1.7%)
- 2.9/ 100 subject had serious adverse events in Tam group vs 1.5 in control (DVT, PE, stroke, endo ca)
- Cost: $64.5 (yrs 1991-2004)
- Tam approved for prevention, clinical use modest

## P-2 (STAR) Trial: Tam vs. Raxolifene

- 19,747 subjects randomized, 1999-2004
- Equal reduction of  invasive breast cancer, but raloxifene less effective in reducing DCIS
- Raloxifene had fewer serious adverse effects (1/3 fewer endo cancers, thrombotic episodes)
- Cost: $129.5M to date
- Clinical use of raloxifene low, NDA to be filed

## P-4: Major Concern

- If positive, will AI’s change the practice of preventive oncology?
-     - Toxicity have discouraged use of tamoxifen and raloxifene
-     - Lack of a placebo control in P-4 will make it difficult to assess toxicity of AI: bone and cardiac effects
-     -  No effect of SERMS on survival.  AI effect will take years to assess.

## Additional Concern:  Is P-4 a Registration Trial?

- Letrozole goes off patent in 2011. Novartis would file for prevention indication if study is positive, but would not invest in marketing
- Position of FDA on trial design is uncertain. Is evaluation of toxicity adequate? How long it will be necessary to monitor subjects?

## Additional Concern: P-4 Trial Cost

- Initial cost of trial (5 yrs) will be $55M
- Follow-up will be an additional 5-10 yrs, with an additional cost of $80 M or more

## Expert Panel: Biomarker for Risk Is Highest Priority for Breast Prevention Trials

- All participants recognize the need to narrow the circle of “high risk” patients, in order to improve the risk/benefit ratio
- NSABP must assure the sharing of blood, tissues, and data (as necessary) to outside investigators through a transparent process

## Recommendations of the NCAB Subcommittee

- While P-4 is a well-designed, interesting, and relevant clinical trial, even if positive, it  is unlikely to change the practice of preventive oncology. In view of the cost of the trial, the patent status of letrazole, and the need for expanded research on biomarkers for risk, we can not offer strong endorsement of its funding.
# Presentation: 714147

## Surface Transportation and  Atmospheric Observation

- Integrating the ITS Infostructure and Environmental Observation
- Paul Pisano, FHWA HOTO-1
- Road Weather Management Program
- Tel: 202 366 1301, email: _[paul.pisano@fhwa.dot.gov](mailto:paul.pisano@fhwa.dot.gov)_
- November, 2001

## National ITS Infostructure

- Goals
- Support FHWA goals: including national security and all-weather military mobilization
- Adequate surveillance to support *all* Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) functions
- National Highway System coverage *at minimum*
- Objectives
- Definitive requirements for large investment
- Mobilize all partners
- An *open* system
- An *integrated* system

## Environmental

- “Road
- Weather”
- Observation

- Observation

**Many**
**Local Agencies**
**and**
**Information**
**Services**

**National**
**Weather Service**
**and Others:**
**Satellite, **
**surface, **
**radar **
**observations**

- Transportation
- Surveillance

- An *open* system
- Coordinated standards and architecture
- An *integrated* system
- Allocation among platforms
- Common assimilation, distribution, archiving

## Transportation Role in Environmental Sensing

- Mobile Pavement
- Temperature, Chemical

- Differential GPS:
- Integrated Water Vapor

- Fixed Environmental
- Sensor Station

- CCTV and Infrared
- for Visibility and
- Road condition

## Requirements:How Many?

- Current ESS Census: 1,200 RPUs,
- equivalent to one per 133 NHS route miles.

**Requirements:How Many?**

- -- relative to prediction needs
- -- by climate type
- -- tradeoff with remote sensing

## Actions Needed

- _Coordination within transportation_
- Open system:  ITS and ESS standard
- Data ownership, liability issues
- _Coordination with meteorological community_
- Efforts for integrated observing system under the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology (OFCM)
- _Requirements research_
- Better guidance for 5-10 year investment program (transportation and other platforms)
# Presentation: 380708

## Shuttle Resources

- Analysis of System Vs. Labor

- DIRECT Man-hours per orbiter flow, OPF Orbiter activity only. Does not include SSME or OMS/RCS Offline Work, ET, SRB, MLP, Pad. Snap-shot from STS-85 (late 1997). Total~140,000 Mhrs.

- Yet “Total” Man-hours per flow will be “only” about 600-700K (which includes engineering, operations planning, quality, support, etc).

- “Tip of the Iceberg”

- $2.4B/Yr
- Actual

- EZ 6-3-99

- Propulsion/

## Why the cascade effect?

**Fragile** TPS, Multiple Interfaces, **No Margin**

- Complex, MPS, **Not Integrated**, **Not Smart**

**Toxic** OMS/RCS

- ECLSS/**Complex** **Active** Thermal Control

- Fuel Cells/PRSD...Propulsion/Power **Not Integrated**

- Payload Bay  Configuration/Re-Configuration and Prep/Clean...**Custom**

- Functional, Checkout, Power, **Non-Smart Systems**

**Many Interfaces**, Inspections, and **Access **Doors

- Remainder...Bulk is **access** platforms setup...jacks, connect and disconnect GSE at** interfaces**, liners for bay, hatches, airlock **GSE** preps...

- EZ 6-3-99

- Propulsion/

## Still...Why the cascade effect?

- STS-42, Discovery,
- Late 1991-Early 1992 Flow

- STS-88, Endeavour,
- Last 1998 Flow

**After 20 Years, still R&R **_***100***_** parts per flight... **
**No end in sight**
**Reliability (low), Margin (low), Complexity (high)**
***Test/Fail/Fix Cycle Must be Extended and Run Through Many Times***
***Results of First Reusable Space Vehicle Operations Experience -***
***      ******Do Not Rush Immature Hardware/Systems into Operation***

**(Graph is Orbiter only, does not include post OMDP, depot maintenance, flows which would otherwise cause *****large***** spikes **_**upward**_** in data).**

- EZ 6-3-99

- (Running Average)

- Number of Parts R&R’ed Per Flight

- Shuttle Mission Designation - Sequential

## Slide 4
# Presentation: 667860

## SMR versus MLS N2O

**SMR versus MLS N2O**
- B. Barret, P. Ricaud, E. Le Flochmoën
- Laboratoire d’Aérologie / Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France

## SMR radiances @ 501.8 GHz 

- Urban *et al., *JGR, 2005

## N2O @ 502.3 GHz 

- 13-55 km

- ~ 2 km

- Urban *et al., *JGR, 2005

- 78.4°S/143.8°E

- 30.4°N/346.1°E

## SMR N2O validation 

**SMR N2O validation**

- Satellites: Envisat/MIPAS

- Balloons/Aircrafts

- Urban *et al., *JGR, 2005

- Within 10-15 ppbv

- Within 10% (vmr > 15ppbv)

## SMR N2O /MLS: selection of data

- SMR (ref. code version 222)
- Measurement response > 0.75
- Good convergence
- MLS (V1.5 L2 data quality and description document)
- Status = 0 + clouds (p < 100 hPa)
- Precision > 0
- Quality > 2.5
- Coincidence criteria
- Distance < 500 km
-  t < 6 hours

##  SMR N2O /MLS : zonal means

*** *****SMR N2O /MLS : zonal means**

##  SMR N2O /MLS : correlations

*** *****SMR N2O /MLS : correlations**

## Mean profiles
Excellent agreement from 68.1 to 1 hPa
MLS > SMR below 68.1 hPa  bias up to 60% at 147 hPa
MLS < SMR above 68.1 hPa  10-15%
SMR noisier than MLS

Correlations
R > 0.75 from 68.1 to 3.2 hPa
Slope MLS/SMR > 0.8 from 31.6 to 3.1 hPa

- Excellent agreement from 68.1 to 1 hPa
- MLS > SMR below 68.1 hPa  bias up to 60% at 147 hPa
- MLS < SMR above 68.1 hPa  10-15%
- SMR noisier than MLS
- Correlations
- R > 0.75 from 68.1 to 3.2 hPa
- Slope MLS/SMR > 0.8 from 31.6 to 3.1 hPa

*** *****SMR N2O /MLS : summary**
# Presentation: 548856

## Slink – new software configuration

-  SLINK and MONSOON communicate using a daemon and sockets connections:

- Process1

- Process2

- Process3

- FILAR
- daemon

- FILAR

- optical link

- socket connections

- FILAR Daemon is the only process that talks with FILAR in that case we avoid the confusion we had with process addresses.
- Each process opens a connection when the software starts and will be using this connection  until Monsoon will end.
- FILAR Daemon is listening these connections waiting for any send (to DHE) request and processes it.
- For data reception, FILAR Daemon knows how many data is requested for each process, so, if it has one full page filled by incoming data it will distribute is into different processes.

## Slink – status & next steps

- - SLINK&MONSOON are working on our lab and it seems to be quite stable for a normal operation. We have not seen any problem on data acquisition.
-  Not yet robust for Hardware failure within a data send process (but not tested)
-  Firmware problems with the reset functionality.
-  CERNTECH contacted last week. He has all the FILAR prepared and ready to send them to us but they have problems with HOLAs (problems with one obsolete FPGA) and they will not be delivered until end of March. The total cost is 23.5k€ and IFAE will pay for it. Once received at IFAE we can ship it to FERMILAB and do the distribution from there.
-  We want to have all the software ready for Slink systems for this date so the migration could be done as soon as possible.
-  Peter contacted us last week and we agree on have a meeting 2nd Week of march with Mark Hunten to talk about slink. They have a software engineer that can work on this.

- Other issues

-  PCB for Clock transition board is going on. I have to put the schematics on the web this week.
-  Our lab is already in operation and we installed a CCD. Noise seem to be under control but clock signals are not arriving to the CCD. Causes are still under investigation.
- Julia and Lluis are back again.
# Presentation: 921230

## Demographic Profiles:

**Social, Economic &**
**Housing Characteristics**

**Tupelo, Mississippi**
**News Briefing**
**May 7, 2002**

***Helping Your Community***
***Make Informed Decisions***

## Educational Attainment (college)

**Mississippi**

- 16.9 %

- 14.7 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Tupelo city**

- 26.7 %

- 21.9 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Lee County**

- 18.1 %

- 15.0 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Educational Attainment (college)**

## Educational Attainment(less than high school)

- 27.1 %

- 35.7 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 25.3 %

- 32.2 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 18.8 %

- 23.9 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Educational Attainment****(less than high school)**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Grandparents as Caregivers

**of one or more of these grandchildren’s “basic needs.”***

- *The 1990 Census did not include a question on grandparents as caregivers.

- 57.1 %

- 2000

- 49.9 %

- 2000

- 48.0 %

- 2000

**Grandparents as Caregivers**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Travel Time to Work

- 24.6  minutes

- 20.6  minutes

- 1990

- 2000

- 19.3  minutes

- 16.9  minutes

- 1990

- 2000

- 15.9  minutes

- 14.3  minutes

- 1990

- 2000

**Travel Time to Work**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Household Income

- $31,300

- $26,300

- 1989

- 1999

- $36,200

- $32,200

- 1989

- 1999

- $38,400

- $36,400

- 1989

- 1999

**Household Income**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Housing Value

- $71,400

- $58,500

- 1990

- 2000

- $85,500

- $68,300

- 1990

- 2000

- $92,800

- $79,900

- 1990

- 2000

**Housing Value**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Residence 5 Years Ago

**state or abroad.**

- 9.5 %

- 8.6 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 7.6 %

- 8.3 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 10.4 %

- 10.3 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Residence 5 Years Ago**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Foreign-born Population

- 1.4 %

- 0.8 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 1.1 %

- 0.4 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 1.6 %

- 0.5 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Foreign-born Population**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Language Spoken at Home

- 3.6 %

- 2.8 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 3.2 %

- 2.0 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 3.9 %

- 2.1 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Language Spoken at Home**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

## Year Structure Built

- 22.1 %

- 24.1 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 26.3 %

- 27.3 %

- 1990

- 2000

- 21.0 %

- 22.5 %

- 1990

- 2000

**Year Structure Built**

**Mississippi**

**Tupelo city**

**Lee County**

**Percent of housing units built in the preceding decade.**