BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 174174

## The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

**The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution**

**Session Name: State Policy I**
**Coastal Hazards Management Course**

-  *The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.*

**Slide 33.1**

## NC Highway 12 Following Hurricane Isabel

**NC Highway 12 Following Hurricane Isabel**
**September 2003**

**Session Name: State Policy I**
**Coastal Hazards Management Course**

**Slide 33.2**

- Source: NC Coastal Federation
- _[www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm](http://www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm)_

## Inlet Created by Hurricane Isabel 

**Inlet Created by Hurricane Isabel **
**September 2003**

**Session Name: State Policy I**
**Coastal Hazards Management Course**

**Slide 33.3**

- Source: NC Coastal Federation
- _[www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm](http://www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm)_

## Inlet Created by Hurricane Isabel

- _[www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm](http://www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm)_

**Inlet Created by Hurricane Isabel**
**September 2003**

**Session Name: State Policy I**
**Coastal Hazards Management Course**

**Slide 33.4**

***The new inlet near Hatteras from the ground. Note the pilings from ***
***a proposed bridge in the 1930s – the last time a hurricane blew a***
*** ******hole in that spot.***

## NC DOT Highway Alternatives

**NC DOT Highway Alternatives**

**Session Name: State Policy I**
**Coastal Hazards Management Course**

**Slide 33.5**

- Source: NC Coastal Federation
- _[www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm](http://www.nccoast.org/ch-issues.htm)_
# Presentation: 014197

## Reading the Resonant Signatures of Planets in Debris Disks

- Marc Kuchner
- CfA

## Zodiacal Light

- Clementine 1994

## Slide 3

## Sun

- Leading

- Trailing

- COBE DIRBE 12 microns

## A Ring Around The Sun

## Slide 6

## Slide 7

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10

## Vega

- arcsec

- arcsec

- IRAM Plateau de Bure 1.3 mm

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Slide 14

## Slide 15

## Slide 16

## Slide 17

## 100 AU

## Quillen & Thorndike 2002

##  EridaniSean Moran

- Planet at a=3.4 AU
- n:1 resonance blobs
- limb brightening from disk’s 25° inclination

##  Eridani models observed

- IRAM PdBI 1.3mm

- SMA 365μm

## Fomalhaut 450 m

- Fomalhaut 450 m
- Holland & Greaves
- & Zuckerman!

## a

- e

- 3:1

- 4:1

- 2:1

## ?

- Terrestrial Planet Finder /Darwin

## Slide 25

## Slide 26

## 20 m

## Keck 

- Keck
- Interferometer

##  Hot Jupiters

- >800 K, <20 pc
- Roasters (<0.5 AU)
- or
- Young (<1Gyr)

-  Hot Jupiters

## Slide 30

## ?

## Slide 32

## 100 AU

- III  + IV?

- IV

- nearly edge-on III?

- edge-on

## Scattering and Circularization

- Thommes, Duncan & Levison 2002

- Neptune?

- Uranus?

- Saturn?

- Jupiter?

- Aphelion

- Perihelion
# Presentation: 489228

- November 2004
- .

**Top Ten Approaches to Lowering Fan Energy in Cleanrooms**

## First the Basics

- Fan Power = _CFM x Pressure Drop (in inches)_ 			   6345  x Fan Eff x Motor Eff

## Ten – Use Best-in-class Motors

- Use Motor Master Software

## Nine – Use Efficient Fans

## Eight – Use Variable Speed Drives

- Thank you cube law!
- Often fan systems are turned down after startup.  This is done most efficiently and most simply with VSDs.

## Seven – Select a Low Pressure Drop System 

- Recirculation Air Handling Systems in Cleanrooms
- Pressurized Plenum
- Ducted Hepa
- Fan Filter Units

## Six – Use Low Face Velocity Air Handlers

## Five – Use Demand Controlled FiltrationTimeclock, occupancy sensor or particle counter

- 40% setback = 70% energy savings

## Four – Select Most Efficient FFUs 

- FFU Performance is a function of:
- - Airflow (CFM) – NOT Velocity
- - Filter Efficiency
- - External Static

## Three – Exhaust Optimization

- Courtesy of Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance Website (www.nwalliance.org)

**Wet Bench - 574 to 254 scfm**

**Vertical Furnace - 628 to 474 scfm**

-  Turn off canopy and snorkel when not in use
-  Lower Exhaust Air Change Rates when unoccupied
-  Minimum Air Change Rates – 12 ACH, 10 ACH, 8 ACH, 6 ACH??

## Two- Use Mini Environments

- Can be coupled with reduction in overall cleanliness rating
- Wafertech

## One - Select Appropriate Air Change Rate

## Results when implemented as a system

## Successes – Air System Optimization

## Air System Optimization – 75% Savings

**Notes:**
Of course, everyone usually cares more about dollars.  The performance of this system was compared through actual measurements to adjacent bays using other design approaches.  Discuss value of metrics.  Comparison includes the very efficient plenum fans AND the less efficient sensible cooling system – it is a true apples to apples comparison that looks at the system energy and cost.

## To Summarize....

- 10 – Use best in class motors
- 9 – Use efficient fans
- 8 – Use VSDs
- 7 – Select a low pressure drop system
- 6 – Use low face velocity air handlers
- 5 – Use demand controlled ventilation – Timeclock or particle sensor
- 4 – Select most efficient FFUs
- 3 – Exhaust Optimization
- 2 - Use Mini Environments
- 1 – Select appropriate air change rate
# Presentation: 118609

## Interagency Timeline

**2001**
- BT I CH start - 10/01

**2002**
- 10/02 - BT II CH start
- 11/02 - BT I Proposed CH
- 11/02 – BT Recovery Plan start

**2005**Salmon Draft RP (Lower Columbia, WA) - 04/05
- BT I Final CH Desig. remanded - 06/05
- BT I Public Comment closes - 06/05BT II Final CH Desig. extension - 06/05
- BT 5-yr SR info request end -01/05
- Revised NSO CH extension granted - 07/05
- SS Final CH Desig. Public review - 08/05
- SSS Draft RP (Puget Sound) - 09/05
- BT Final CH Desig. (all populations) - 09/26/05
- BLM RMP Planning Criteria release - 09/05
- BLM RMP scoping - 12/05
- SSS Final RP (Puget Sound) - 12/05Salmon DRP (Upper Columbia; Snake River, WA;  Yakima; Hood Canal; Lake Ozette) – 12/05

**2003**
- FS LMP start (Okanogan/Wenatchee/Colville)

**2004**
- FS LMP start (Wallowa Whitman/Umatilla/ Malheur)
- 04/04 - BT 5-year SR start
- 04/04 - Fisher SR end
- 06/04 - BT II Proposed CH
- 04/04 - BT 5-year SR info request start
- 10/04 – BT I Final CH Desig.

- As of August 15, 2006

**Acronyms & Abbreviations:** ***Species:*** Bull Trout (**BT**); Northern Spotted Owl (**NSO**); Marbled Murrelet (**MM**); West Coast Salmon & Steelhead (**SS**.); Salmon Shared Strategy (SSS), Fisher Conservation Assessment & Strategy (**FCAS**).  ***Processes:*** Critical Habitat (CH); Recovery Plan (RP); Designation (Desig.); FS Land Management Plan (LMP); BLM Resource Management Plan (RMP); Status Review (SR).

**Dates Unknown**
**Salmon Draft RP** (Oregon Coast - not scheduled)**BT 5-year Status Review Final**
**BT Recovery Plan Final**
**Final Status Review Plans** - Pending

## FS LMP start (Okanogan/Wenatchee/Colville)FS LMP end (Wallowa Whitman/Umatilla/ Malheur)

**2006 **
- FS LMP start (Fremont/Winema)
- 06/06 – Draft S&M SEIS published/90-day public comment period begins
- 09/06 - Rev. MM CH Proposed
- 09/06 – FCAS draft assessment
- 10/06 - Salmon Draft RP (Oregon Coast)
- 11/06 - FCAS draft strategy
- 12/06 - Revised NSO CH Proposed12/06 - Salmon Final RP (Upper Columbia; Snake River, WA; Yakima; Hood Canal; Lake Ozette;  Lower Columbia)
- 12/06 – Final S&M SEIS published

**2007**
- FS LMP start (Okanogan/Wenatchee/Colville)FS LMP end (Wallowa Whitman/Umatilla/ Malheur)
- Proposed RMP/Draft EIS – 03/07
- S&M ROD signed – 03/07
- BLM WOPR Comment Period - 04/07
- BLM WOPR Comment Period - 06/07
- Revised MM Final CH Desig. - 08/07Final NSO Recovery Plan  – 09/07
- Plan Preferences BLM RMP/FEIS - 11/07
- Revised NSO Final CH Desig. – 12/07

**2008**
- 03/08 - BLM RMP ROD published
- 04/08 - BLM RMP implementation start
# Presentation: 016071

## Identification of Potential Strategic Partners using VxInsight

- Kevin Boyack
- Sandia National Laboratories

## Process Steps

- Select appropriate data set (queries to ISI physical science citation database of 4.7 million papers)
- Calculate x-y position for each paper (ordination)
- Query database to acquire list of organizations or individuals to focus on (relationship to Sandia)
- Use VxInsight to explore overlap and relationships between Sandia and other organizations
- Organizations that overlap Sandia in multiple areas are potential strategic partners

## First Generation SAND92 set Specifics

- Initial query on Sandia since 1992 yielded 3451 papers
- Cited/citing pairs on Sandia papersgave 31623 unique papers
- Similarity measure between pairs of papers calculated using cocitation analysis
- Ordination: x-y position calculated for the 31623 papers using the similarity matrix above
- Landscape constructed using VxInsight

## X-Y Scatterplot of Ordination (shows clustering)

## Top Level View of SAND92 Landscape (overlap with IBM)

## Joint Citations With IBM, Bell Labs, and Philips

- _Joint Citations With IBM, Bell Labs, and Philips_

## Top Level View of Landscape (overlap with DuPont)

- _Top Level View of Landscape (overlap with DuPont)_

## Detailed View (overlap with Dupont in Superconducting)

- _Detailed View (overlap with Dupont in Superconducting)_

- Area of detail

## First generation			Second generation

Second generation set has 514k articles with 1.42M citation pairs (ordination not done yet)
Second generation will reveal more potential partners (35.5k vs. 5.2k distinct addresses)

- Second generation set has 514k articles with 1.42M citation pairs (ordination not done yet)
- Second generation will reveal more potential partners (35.5k vs. 5.2k distinct addresses)

- _Second Generation SAND92 set_
# Presentation: 694676

## CONCLUSIONS  (from submitted paper)  

**The southern rim of the Isidis Basin (Libya Montes) has been strongly modified by fluvial erosional processes, including weathering, mass wasting, fluvial incision, and transport and deposition of sediment.  **
**Most of this erosion occurred during the Noachian, but a late stage of fluvial incision probably extended into the Hesperian.  **

**Geomorphic Analysis of the Libya Montes Region: Implications for Geology of Isidis Landing Ellipse** Jeff Moore (NASA Ames) & Alan Howard (Uva)

## CONCLUSIONS (Continued) 

**Flat upland plateaus remained largely undissected, but the steeper margins of the plateaus, as well as interior and exterior crater rims, were deeply eroded, with sediments accumulating as fans, bajadas, and, possibly, playa lake deposits within crater interiors and in inter-crater basins. **
**Late in the Noachian the steeper fans systems became dissected, presumably as a result in a decrease in sediment shed from uplands or an increase in runoff.  **
**During the latest Noachian to early Hesperian, further clear water discharges created an integrated set of valleys incised into the earlier basin deposits.  **
**Discharge for the late stage dissection was probably from precipitation runoff rather than groundwater sapping.**

## Missing Image

## Slide 4

## IMPLICATIONS FOR LANDING ELLIPSE 

**Lot of fluvial erosion in Libya Montes, with many channels heading toward Isidis Planitia.  None of the channels we studied cut Isidis itself.  Unambiguously fluvial channels were unobserved below -2700 m elevation.**
**MOLA topography shows several indistinct ramps that slope down into the southern edge of the ellipse from the Libya Montes that might be alluvial fans, though this interpretation is problematical.**
**Most of the ellipse is dominated by a unit that is superposed (with a sharp contact) on the “fans” that is clearly seen in THEMIS mid-IR images and appears to be associated with “Thumbprint” terrain.  This material appears similar to that which will be sampled by *****Beagle 2*****.  We infer no obvious relationship of this “Thumbprint” terrain material with Libya Montes fluvial deposition.**
# Presentation: 461282

## Coarsening Pathway Analysis in Ni-Al-Cr by Lattice Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation NSF Grant DMR-0241928, David N. Seidman, PI

**Coarsening Pathway Analysis in Ni-Al-Cr by Lattice Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation** NSF Grant DMR-0241928, David N. Seidman, PI

- The kinetic pathway for nucleation and growth of gamma prime precipitates in Ni-Al-Cr alloys is strongly dependent on long-range solute-vacancy binding energies. Two adjacent precipitates coalesce when a **solute-vacancy binding energy** exists. They both grow at similar rates, but with fluctuations in their respective sizes: e.g. at 15 min, the right-hand precipitate is smaller than the left-hand one, while the reverse is true at 24 min. They finally merge coalesce at  30 min as a result of a neck forming between them.

- Transitional states around  the /’ iso-ordering interface exhibit wide (diffuse) Ni, Al, Cr concentration profiles in the decomposition stages where coagulation prevails.
# Presentation: 718447

## Bering Climate:  An Evolving View of Ecosystem Change in the Bering Sea

- James E. Overland and Nancy N. Soreide (NOAA/PMEL)
- Sergei Rodionov (UW/JISAO-NOAA/PMEL)

**American Meteorological Society Meeting****January 29-Feb 3, 2006, Atlanta, GA**

## Support of Fisheries Management 

- Objective:
- Near-realtime ecological and climatic surveillance indices for the Bering Sea
-  Based on a retrospective protocol for detection of change
- Weather, climate data, sea ice data, fisheries, and other biological data

## www.beringclimate.noaa.gov

## www.arctic.noaa.gov/detect

## Recent loss of sea ice in southern Bering Sea in April 2000-2005

- Recent loss of sea ice in southern Bering Sea in April 2000-2005

## Depth Averaged Temperature (°C) at M2:  2 deg C increase in winter after 2000:             above freezing point.      Summer 2005 warmest temperature

- Stabeno

## Southern Bering Sea Ecosystem Changes

- 1999

- 2003

**Warm temperatures favor ****pollock over Arctic species**

## 10 M new Salmon

-  in the N. Bering Sea
-  in 2004 - following
-  increase northward
- movement of pollock

- Helle

## Persistent Arctic Changes

**Sea Ice Decreasing**

**Tundra shown in Pink**

- From NSIDC

**Tundra Decreasing **

## Arctic Oscillation (AO) Climate Index

- Thompson and Wallace, 1998 *Geo. Res. Let**.*

##   Climate Patterns

- Temperature Anomalies

-   Climate Patterns

-      1977-1988 (PNA+)                      1989-1995 (AO+)            2000-2005 (Arctic Warm)
-     Pacific North American                 Arctic Oscillation

## Summary

- Bering Sea fisheries represent 40% of US landed fish catch
- Worth of pollock products alone is $1.1B/year
- Bering Sea ecosystem is reorganizing to a warmer, ice-free sub-arctic system.  Ecosystem is shifting northward.
- The Bering Sea seems to be responding to larger scale changes in the broader Arctic
- Problem is symmetric:
- Climate change impacts ecosystems
- Ecosystems serve as indicators for climate change

- www.beringclimate.noaa.govwww.arctic.noaa.gov
# Presentation: 532497

## EDM Engineering Issues

- General Mechanical Considerations
- EDM Cryostat Plan D
- ANSYS EMAG Calculations
- ANSYS MECH Calculations

- 3 June ‘03 J. Boissevain

## General Mechanical Issues

- Vibration
- Large roots blower system for Dilution Refrigerator
- Cold Heads
- Choice of Cold Heads or Liquefier
- Choice of Helium Purification Method
- Define Requirements for Polarized 3He Injection
- Assembly Issues with Cesium Coating
- Collimator Design
- Neutron Guide/Splitter Design
- Magnetic Shielding in ER2
- Maintenance of Apparatus
- Real Estate in ER2

## EDM Cryostat Plan D

- 0.8m (30”) diameter x 2m long fiberglass enclosure tube with metal flanges
- Thin copper foil HV ground-plane glued to enclosure tube inner surface
- Inside: target cell/electrode assembly, light guides
- Cos θ magnet outside enclosure
- RF coils
- Ferromagnetic Shield – location determined by Cos θ magnet uniformity requirements

## EDM Cryostat Plan D (2)

- Superconducting shield – lead layer supported by aluminum can – 4°K
- Heat shield - 50°K
- μMetal shield - 300°K
- Vacuum Can ?
- Cryogenic polarized 3He bend to target preparation vessel
- Helium purifier ???

## EDM Cryostat Plan D (3)

- Horizontal location for variable capacitor
- Trade-off between shielding and apparatus heigt

## ANSYS EMAG Calculations 

- Magnet Design
- Uniform field over a large volume
- Proximity of Ferromagnetic and super-conducting shields
- Large SS flanges and enclosure
- HV Electrode Design
- Target cell material properties
- Thin metal (Cu?) coated acrylic?
- RF Coil Design
- Sensitivity to field variations over large volume
- Shielding Design
- Large complicated shape with multiple large penetrations

## ANSYS MECH Calculations

- Cryogenic Safety Issues
- Calculate wire seal flanges and conflat flanges for pressure application
- Size safety vents
- Window Design
- Mechanical Support of Target Enclosure/HV Variable Capacitor (>1000Kg)

## Slide 8

## Slide 9

## Slide 10
# Presentation: 480768

## State-of-art 

**Electron Bunch Compression**
- Philippe Piot
***Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory***
**August 23, 2004**

## Electron bunch compression/manipulation

*Electron bunch compression/manipulation*
*Magnetic-based  compression*
*Radio-frequency-based compression*
*Exotic bunch compression schemes*

## Slide 3

## Generate short bunch 

- Generate short bunch
- directly at the e- source:*- pulse DC e- source, *
*- X-band rf-gun, **- laser/plasma e- sources*

- Manipulate the bunch at
- a later stage than generation

- compression

- Select part of the bunch during the transport:*- collimator+dispersive section, *
*- modulation + laser, *

## Correlation

- Compression

## Slide 6

## No compression

- Mild compression

- Strong compression

## (proposed by J. England et al., UCLA)

*(proposed by J. England et al., UCLA)*

## (M. Huening, et al NIMA235 123-34)

*(M. Huening, et al NIMA235 123-34)*

## Slide 10

## z 1.1 mm

- 1-GeV Damping Ring

***z *1.1 mm

***z*  40 **m

***z*  12 **m

***z*  6 mm

- SLAC Linac

-       30 GeV

- FFTB

*(P. Emma et al, PAC'01)*

## Non-rigid bunch: longitudinal motin may occur

*(Serafini/Ferrario, AIP (581):87 (2001))*

## (P. Piot, et al PRSTAB(6) 033503 (2003)

*(P. Piot, et al PRSTAB(6) 033503 (2003)*

## (P. Musimeci, et al PAC'03)

*(P. Musimeci, et al PAC'03)*

## Slide 15

## Slide 16
# Presentation: 147189

## Kineret (anakinra)

- The FDA Perspective

## CBER Review Team

- Raymond Donnelly, Ph.D.: Product (CMC)
- Jeffrey Siegel, M.D.: Clinical
- George Mills, M.D.: Clinical (imaging)
- Debra Bower: Bio-Research Monitoring
- BoGuang Zhen, Ph.D.: Biostatistics
- Anne Pilaro, Ph.D.: Preclinical pharm/tox
- Laurie Paserchia, M.D.: Clinical pharmacol.
- Reginald Neal: Compliance
- Victoria Tyson-Medlock: Regulatory

## BLA# 99-1490 (STN: 103950)

- Dec. 28, 1999: Application received
- Assigned a standard 10-month review
- April 2000: Pre-license inspection
- Nov. 17, 2000: Complete Review letter sent
- March 2, 2001: Response from Amgen
- Classifed as a class-2 resubmission

## Kineret (anakinra)

- Recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist
- Expressed in *E. coli*
- Amino acid sequence is identical to native human IL-1ra except for the addition of an N-terminal methionine residue
- Molecular weight = 17.3 kDa

## Kineret (anakinra)

- Anakinra is purified through a series of chromatography steps
- The purified bulk drug substance (BDS) is analyzed for identity, purity and potency
- The purified BDS is formulated and sterile filtered
- The finished drug product is supplied in prefilled syringes as a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid

## Kineret (anakinra)

- Inhibits the action of IL-1 by competitively blocking the binding of IL-1 to IL-1 receptors on IL-1 responsive target cells
- PK studies showed that the terminal half-life of anakinra following SC administration ranges from 3 to 6 hours
- No evidence of drug accumulation in RA patients after daily dosing for up to 24 weeks
# Presentation: 177349

##                       EPICS OPC Gateway

Nov. 2000 ... May 2002

CA Client->OPC:             Andrei Makhnachev,DESYOPC-> CA Server:           Kay-Uwe Kasemir, LANLOPC Experience:             Matthias Clausen, DESY
Investigating:                 Sverdrup (TN, SNS conv. Fac.)

- Nov. 2000 ... May 2002
- CA Client->OPC:             Andrei Makhnachev,DESYOPC-> CA Server:           Kay-Uwe Kasemir, LANLOPC Experience:             Matthias Clausen, DESY
- Investigating:                 Sverdrup (TN, SNS conv. Fac.)

## OPC?

- OPC: OLE  COM for Process Control
- COM: Component Object Model, Microsoft/Win32 API
- CORBA w/ actual application support
- All COM Objects have Interface *IUnknown* plusinterfaces to implement an...
- ActiveX Component/Widget
- ActiveX Automation Server:(Visual Basic, Interpreters)
- _OPC Data Access Server/Client_
- ....

- _IUnknown:_AddRef,Release,QueryInterface

- _IObjectX:_Method1,Method2,...

## OPC Data Access Details

- Specs: http://www.OPCFoundation.org
- Data Access Object Model:OPC Server, Group, Item
- Other Interfaces:
- Browsing(Info for humans, does not show what items can be created dynamically)
- Subscribe to group (max. rate, deadband) for async. notification
- Read/write item data (Timestamp, quality, value)
- AllenBradley, Siemens, National Instruments, ...provide OPC Server as a generic “Driver”

## OPC and CA

- OPC-CAS: OPC client, CA Server
- allows browsing (mostly for debugging)
- reads ASCII config file
- puts all Items in one group “Default”, requests 10Hz updates, serves via EPICS ChannelAccess
- Andrei Makhnachev (DESY) wrote CA client/OPC server
- Both: Softing OPC lib.  can distribute binaries, needs license to compile

- SERVER=OPC Simulated Data Demo
- # Explicitly list OPC Name & PV:
- ITEM
- {
-   # Required: Name of OPC Item
-   NAME=SINE:0.0..10.0:2.0
-   # Optional: PV, defaults to Item name
-   PV=Sine
-   # Optional, will be served/observed
-   EGU=Ticks
-   HIHI=9
-   HIGH=8
-   LOW=2
-   LOLO=1
- }

- # Browse OPC Server, pick OPC items via regular
- # expression, maybe use translation file.
- # Here, items matching “SINE:xxx:yyy”
- # will be served as “SINEzzz” where
- # “zzz” is “yyy” translated via numbers.trs which
- # looks like this:
- #    1.0   one
- #    2.0   two
- ITEMCLASS
- {
- 	NAME=(SINE):.*:(.*)
- 	TRANSLATE2=numbers.trs
- 	DELIM=:
- 	EGU=Parts
- }

## OPC-CAS Snapshot

## Conclusions?

- OPC: Great Idea for PC platform
- Standard across vendors, no longer separate drivers for LabVIEW, Intellution, VisualBasic, ...
- EPICS 3.14 for Win32 Hostsshould support  DTYP “OPC”  benefit from OPC driversinstead of having to implementmany device specific drivers
- Problems:
- No experience with performance, dependability
- Already different versions (IOPCAsyncIO2...)
- Networked via DCOM but no connection management

- record(ai, “opc:xx”)
- {
-    field(DTYP, “OPC”)
-    field(INP,”# ‘OPC Server XYZ’ fred”)
- ...
- }
# Presentation: 520487

## Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety

- Donald St.Pierre
- Deputy Director for
- New Device Evaluation
- RAPS 2003 Annual Conf. 10/22/03

## OIVD UPDATE

- People
- TPLC Initiatives
- IVD Compliance
- IVD Premarket Review

## PEOPLE

- Where are they now?
- Clara Sliva
- Kaiser Aziz
- Who’s MDUFMA bought me?

**DCTD**
- Courtney Harper
- Doug Rheinheimer
**DMD**
- Sally Hojvat
- Marieann Brill
- Nadine Brock
- Tara Goldman
- Kate Simon

**DIHD**
- Tim O’Leary
- Tremel Faison
- Cecily Jones
- Paula Stewart
**OIVD**
- James Woods
- Terri Garvin
- Valerie Vashio
- OSB - Statistician

## II.  TPLC ACTIVITIES

- LabSun (7/9 labs  trained)
- Patient Safety News (IVD Focus)
- OIVD Reviewing MDRs
- Webpage Updates
- OTC Database
- FDA Decision Summary
- CBER/CDRH Interactions

## Ongoing TPLC Activities

- Continuous TPLC Training
- Outcomes – systemic review of literature
- lessons learned
- Info roll-in (process improvement)
- mtgs, contacts, listservs, MDRs, etc.
- Increase Communication/Visibility/Coordination
- NIH Research Steering Committee
- US Tag to ISO – prothrombin time

## IVD COMPLIANCE

- Talk first – all players involved
- Gather information
- Take action, if needed
- 	Step aside, if not
- Product experts on some inspections
- Investigating - can we say something good?

## IV. IVD PREMARKET REVIEW

- Steps to Mount Olympus
- √  Template-Based Review
- Template-Based Submissions
- Turbo 510(k)
- Up-front Collaborations/reduced review
- SARS IDE < 48 hours
- WNV Denovo < 1 week
- Customer Satisfaction Survey
# Presentation: 082973

## D0 Status & Plans

- Experiment is in good shape, and basically ready for beam
- Shutdown status has been presented several times already
- Detector fully closed last Wednesday
- Wednesday evening magnet tests
- Toroid powered up fine with both polarities
- Initial problem with solenoid quickly solved by replacing current module
- Thursday and Friday: preparation and recovery from 2 power outages
- No problems recovering from power outages
- Delaying Thursday power outage from ~12:00 to 17:00 was major annoyance, lost time for literally hundreds of people
- Established zero-bias running with complete detector on Saturday and Sunday, cosmics with entire detector Sunday evening
- Completed supervised access on Sunday evening
- Expect – as usual – brief controlled accesses for minor electronics repairs
- In particular, some CFT/PS AFE boards are still undergoing debugging

## D0 Status & Plans

- Extended cosmic ray running and special runs for the next couple of days
- DAQ is not yet as stable as it should be – lots of underlying soft-/hardware changed, shake down DAQ and trigger
- Find as many detector problems as possible before first store
- Continue 24x7 shifts, detector shifters on-call during owl shifts
- Will start up with pre-shutdown trigger list to establish baseline
- After successful tests, change prescales to make use of expected higher readout bandwidth (1 kHz) into Level 3
- From the beginning running with 5 of 6 Silicon Track Trigger crates in the readout
- All Beta Level 2 system
- Factor of 2 to 10 reduction in calorimeter noise
- Full luminosity system readout
- Completed FPD system (detectors and readout)
- Some commissioning effort expected to integrate STT, FPD, L2, luminosity system, preshower
# Presentation: 884633

## THE LOCAL TIMES

**States Save Money; Increase Transportation for Medicaid Clients**

-      Lsdfjk l;asd fjk l;asd fjk skopf erop orpeo dop[ dllp d;o.
-      Sj;dflk sdfjg;ksdfg dfgk;lksdjfg ;lksdf
- sdjgkjsdf s dkfogp
- sdfgjoi; sdifog;sdf sijdf g;sidf  sj re erg erg hjl owi w iruwe. Sieouhf  iefj; iehh p9eh oiuerp ih7g ikuh u3y8u iwib uhef pi9wer p9ihp 9oerj oier [per pijer ;ipor p93g i3be ilejr i3h3n i3l3me i3jh3 urn urjrn u4jh4 ii5j i4j4n i3j3h 3j3h ry4h3i3 i3h3g3

-      Lsdfjk l;asd fjk l;asd fjk skopf erop orpeo dop[ dllp d;o
- ; sdifog;sdf sijdf g;sidf  sj re erg erg hjl owi w iruwe.
-      Ejrigoer;oig  dfg ng isd;irger;igjisejrg;  sjeri dldfg dfgop[f euhw2 o3ri io8u4h iyewh i4h4b u4yt3b y3g2 y3y yyy3g 3po8r 8y3 83rboi8u 38yrh poy3er po83ur 83y3h 050 6f21 p9we sdjhbf pioefjn jrnru3 o;ehf iej393 o3h8r wkehf oejrprop keke

-      Lsdfjk l;asd fjk l;
- asd hfj kasd hiwi wj
-      Ejrigoer;oig  dfg s;eoigrj30eoi .  Yshk sjfj sjio sjiope eio.
-      Rjklsg sjklg gjir gji sig rjgis.  Tjor jir isj jioshsoijh hjir hijro.  Jisjkog sjios r I qwuh
-      wiudhw o3yeh uagd iwihr uweb iw7 u3u3b khrur irormeg irnr irjrno ireh3 irneh irnr uy3h i4h4b rirm keje poiwjer 9o3i 3i3j 9ow2jr;o ekeu worh eie ppjfp pwofjp][wfk

- dfgk;lksdjfg ;lksdf
- sdjgkjsdf s dkfogp
- sijdf g;sidf  sj re erg erg hjl owi w iruwe.
-      Ejrigoer;oig  dfg ng isd;irger;igjisejrg;  sjeri dldfg dfgop[f
- djgidojig eorijgjs;eo s;eoigrj30eoi .
-      Asdhf fhsi shuf e  wheruh whe  ht I h  th    uw tyw t wytuw y w y uyw t yu  y   ywutw iwuhiwu hwubobod uwi uhiut fg
-      djiof sf fetp eo[fk
- doi gjido swfrounf jf.
# Presentation: 656465

**Take a sneak peek at our BAT presentation**

**Take a sneak peek at our GEOLOGY presentation!**

## Geology Rocks!

- This program covers:
- Plate tectonics theory
- Sedimentary, metamorphic, igneous rocks
- How Oregon Caves NM was formed
- Rock challenge activity

## Geology is the study of the earth

**Geology is the study of the earth**

**And the processes that shape it.**

**Mantle**

**Crust**

**Crust**

**Ocean**

- Plate Tectonics

- © Steven Beyer

## Heat

- Subduction

**Limestone**

**Heat**

**Marble**

**How Oregon Caves National Monument was created.**

- © Steven Beyer

**Cave Rock Challenge**

- The cave rock challenge is made up of a series of 6 clues that will help the students identify the different rocks we will provide during the classroom visit.
# Presentation: 637814

## Update from Stony Brook

- Stony Brook Gang

## Two More Shots

- Seem to show Good QE in local tests:
- _[https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/jkamin/browse1_qe.html](https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/jkamin/browse1_qe.html)_
- Chicklet mystery:
- Expect 150 pA current.
- Saw 0.7 pA???
- Mishandling cause factor of 200 QE drop??
- Still have another Chicklet, same shot.

## Pump Woes

- Main Scroll pump suffered failure.
- Rebuilt one on order.
- Local fix to existing one as well.
- Used “little guy” as main pump.
- Revealed additional troubles:
- Cryo gate valve leaks!
- Too large gas load during cool-down.
- Burden on turbo during pumpdown.
- Rich L and Bill will service it this week.

## Bad hole on Gain Test Chamber.

- One LEMO hole is bigger than others!
- LEMO does not engage.
- Will weld plug over the hole to seal.

## No shot this week.

- Concentrate on curing the inconsistent performance of the cryo pump:
- Cryo Gate Valve CERTAINLY leaks.
- ALL observations could be consistent with a single failure:  Cryo Main Gate Valve.
- Time for minor mods to Evap chamber.
- Next “weekly shot” next week.
# Presentation: 748528

## Synthetic Vision Systems

- Objectives
- In all weather conditions, replicate the SAFETY and operational benefits of clear-day flight operations
- Develop commercial, business, general aviation, and rotorcraft Synthetic Vision applications for both existing & future cockpits

- Elements
- Commercial and Business Aircraft (CAB) Synthetic Vision Systems
- General Aviation and Rotorcraft (GARC) Synthetic Vision Systems
- Enhanced Vision Sensors and Enabling Technologies (EVSET)

***	******Aviation Safety Program***

- Contacts
- SVS Project Manager: Dan Baize
- (757) 864-1071;  d.g.baize@larc.nasa.gov
- CAB Element Lead: Brad Perry
- (757) 864-8257;  raleigh.b.perry@larc.nasa.gov
- GARC Element Lead: Mary Kaiser
- (650) 604-4448;  mkaiser@mail.arc.nasa.gov
- EVSET Element Lead: Dave Eckhardt
- (757) 864-1698;  d.e.eckhardt@larc.nasa.gov
# Presentation: 045957

## SVX4 and PHENIX

- Vince Cianciolo (ORNL)
- Ken Read (ORNL/ UT)
- 9 June 2003

## Proposed PHENIX sensor

- “u” readout

- “x” readout

- 3cm x 6cm device
- 80um x 1mm “pads” connected into 80um x 3cm strips
- 750 strips per orientation per sensor
- Readout at edges and center

## SVX4

- 128-channel Si-strip readout chip developed by FNAL/LBNL.
- Pipelined digitization and readout (42-deep pipeline for analog samples).
- 4-event LVL1-accept buffering.
- On-board zero-suppression available (or not).
- Multi-stage pedestal subtraction.
- Designed for AC-coupled device (Z. Li sensors DC-coupled). Two handles:
- Frequent storage-cap resets.
- Cool sensors to 0 degrees C to reduce leakage current.
- Certainly able to do first. May suffice, but may want to cool anyway.
- Integration time (~80 ns) much shorter than sensors have been tested at. Possibly worse S/N.
- FNAL indicated willingness to do wafer-testing.

## Where does SVX4 come in?

## SVX4 Testboard

- The point of the testboard we are developing is to mimic the PHENIX DAQ. This will allow us to test the compatibility of the SVX4 and will provide us w/a means to test the SVX4 with a sensor.
- The CDF hybrid is the equivalent to what I have been calling a ROC. It houses four SVX4 chips that would be wire bonded to a sensor or group of sensors. CDF has agreed to provide us with a hybrid and one of their low-level testboards that serves to provide a ribbon-cable connection to the SVX4’s.
- Our testboard is controlled by a LabView-based GUI that allows us to specify and download serial (mimics ARCNet) and mode-bit (mimics the GTM) control strings to the SVX4’s on the hybrid through the input FIFO buffer. The mode-bit strings can contain L1 accepts and ENDDAT signals which will cause the SVX4 to dump data into the output FIFO buffer (mimics DCM) where they can be read by the PC.

- PC
- LabView GUI

- USB Connection

## Status

- Testboard in hand, populated, communication established.
- LabView GUI essentially finished.
- Testboard FPGA programming underway (estimate couple of weeks).
- Miljko goes on vacation for 1 month shortly, Vince to BNL (MuID) for 1 month shortly.
- Hope to test compatibility w/ pseudo-PHENIX DAQ in August.
- Test w/ sensor in September?
# Presentation: 182758

## D0 Weekly Summary: June 9th to June 15th 

- Delivered Luminosity and operating efficiency
- Delivered 5.3 pb-1
- Recorded 4.7 pb-1 (88%)
- Mostly smooth data taking
- Several  disparate issues
- Total number of events collected
- 10.7 mln
- Beam halo
- No problems
- Beam position
- Within 1mm from the detector center and stable

** **

**Day of the Week **

## Major Issues for Downtime Last Week

- Issues affecting efficiency:
- Calorimeter download problem prior to, and continuing into Store 2684.
- High occupancies in one section of calorimeter
- Originally thought to be pedestal problem, attempted solution of creating and downloading new pedestal set
- Finally determine to be erroneous configuration script
- More than 2 hours of beam time lost
- CTT diagnostic crate readout at start of Store 2686
- Non-essential crate, eventually taken out of readout
- A “soft” failure, so repeated attempts to resurrect readout
- Approximately 30 minutes of beam time

## Major Issues for Downtime Last Week

- Data quality problems not accounted for in efficiency
- Unusual – recorded data is expected to be usable for analysis
- In Stores 2665 and 2667 there was a power supply problem for 1 stereo supersector and part of 1 axial supersector of the CFT.  Result was a hole in acceptance:Access to repair after Store 2665 incomplete; finally repaired in access after Store 2667.  Total data affected ~ .9 pb-1
- In Store 2686 there were readout problems with a CTT diagnostic crate.  The crate was removed from the run, but the shifter mistakenly ignored CTT trigger configuration errors.  The tracking trigger was compromised for ~.1 pb-1 of data.

## D0 Summary

- Stably collecting physics data with full detector in readout
- 88% efficiency, with some data quality loss  ~ 70% effective efficiency
- D0 Collaboration meeting is this week in France
- Many experts are not around
- Working under  “no changes” policy
- Plan for this week
- Physics data taking during stack and store operations
- Access requests
- Repair smoke detector (VESDA) in muon truss
- Check/repair HV on Muon PDT wires
- None urgent – can do parasitically when possible
# Presentation: 210390

## Reliable and Secure Group Communication

**1/17/2002**

**Reliable and Secure Group Communication**

- PI: Deb Agarwal
- Karlo Berket, Olivier Chevassut, and Guillaume Egles

- Distributed Systems Department
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

## Peer-to-Peer Model

- Allow ad-hoc collaboration
- Remove centralized servers
- scalable to large collaborations
- remove bottleneck
- Better model for many collaborations – no central authority
- Easy to add new resources to the collaboration
- minimize setup required
- allows local control over resource authorization

## System Design

- Application

- Network

- Processor

- Secure Group
- Layer

- InterGroup Reliable Multicast

## InterGroup Reliable Multicast

- Membership divided into senders and receivers
- Receiver oriented selection of delivery service
- FIFO order, causal order, or timestamp order
- Membership changes delivered in order
- Control hierarchy
- Scalable collection of status information
- Maintain coordination with receivers

## InterGroup Schematic

## Secure Group Layer (SGL)

- Support dynamic membership
- members join and leave the group at any time (e.g., network partitions and merges)
- membership is not known in advance
- Achieve strong security goals
- authenticated key exchange (AKE)
- mutual authentication (MA)
- forward secrecy (FS)
- Provide an SSL-like secure channel

## System Design

- Application

- Network

- Processor

- Symmetric crypto algorithms

- Reliable
- delivery
- semantics

- Group DH
-  key exchange
- algorithms

- Access
- control
- algorithm

## Authorization

- Resource = the communication group
- Access via
- Password
- Akenti/CAS
- Open issues
- Need mechanisms that can handle a dynamically changing group membership
- Who is the resource authority?
- Peer-based authorization
- Receiver group

## For More Information

- Reliable and Secure Group Communication
- Deb Agarwal (_[DAAgarwal@lbl.gov](mailto:DAAgarwal@lbl.gov)_)
- http://www-itg.lbl.gov/CIF/GroupComm/
# Presentation: 189599

## switchcaneArurndinaria gigantea (Walt.) Muhl. Synonyms:  A.  bambusina,  A.  gigantea, A.  macrosperma,  A.  tecta,  Bambusa newmanii, Festuca  grandiflora, Ludolfia  macrosperma, L. tecta,  Miegia gigantea,  M. macrosperma, M. pumilia,  Nastus  macrospermus, Triglossum  bambusinum.  Other common names: cane, cane reed, giant cane, large cane, small cane. 

**PLANT FACTS:**
- This bamboo grass is native to all the Gulf Coast states.  Much of the bamboo you see currently growing are actually introduced grasses from Japan.  Prior to settlement this bamboo grew on large areas known as 'cane brakes' in floodplains.  It grows perennially with the major mode of reproduction being vegetative by rapid growing rhizomes and not by seed.  It normally grows 5 to 6 feet tall, but has been recorded as reaching heights of 30 feet.  The stems become hard or "woody".
- When young this grass can be used by livestock as forage.  It is nutritious, but can be wiped out by continuous grazing or rooting by feral pigs.

- Photo courtesy of: USDA NRCS, 1995-Midwestern Wetland Flora.

- Slide developed by Pat Broyles, Soil Conservationist, Manhattan, KS. PMC.  USDA is an equal opportunity employer.

## switchcane

**FOOD:**
- Young shoots were cooked and used as a pot herb in soups or stews.  The seed can be ground and used as a flour substitute.  Seed harvest cannot be relied upon annually because this grass only flowers at irregular intervals over several years.
**MEDICINAL:**
- The Houma Indians of California used a decoction of root to stimulate the kidneys and 'renew strength'.  Other tribes used the decoction of root as a cathartic.
**CULTURALLY:**
- This plant was important to the Cherokees way of life.  They used it extensively in weaving baskets which could carry heavy loads.  It was also the major construction material in building their homes.  After a framework of timbers were put up the walls were actually woven out of the leaves from this grass.  All the walls would then be covered in mud, giving it a stucco appearance.  This made a very comfortable house in keeping out the wind and rains.  The early Europeans were astounded at the architecture and craftsmanship the Cherokees used in making their homes.
- Woody stems were used to make flutes, blowguns and arrow shafts.  Blowguns were widely used to hunt small game.  Dry stems were also used as tinder in their fireplaces.

- Photo courtesy of: USDA NRCS,
- 1995-Midwestern Wetland Flora.

- Slide developed by Pat Broyles, Soil Conservationist, Manhattan, KS. PMC.  USDA is an equal opportunity employer.
# Presentation: 693464

## USCMS Integration Grid Testbed

- Anzar Afaq
- FermiLab

**Deployment, Operation and Troubleshooting**

## Introduction

- Test, Integration and Production Grid Test Beds
- Tier-I/Tier-II resources combined into Grid effort.
- About 230 CPU (750 MHz equivalent, RedHat Linux 6.1)
- Additional 80 CPU at 2.4 GHz running RedHat Linux 7.X
- About 5 TB local disk space plus Enstore Mass storage at FNAL using dCache.
- Caltech, Fermilab, U Florida, UC SanDiego, (UW Madison support).
- CERN/LCG (with 80 CPUs) is joining.
- Dedicated resources.
- Middleware
- Globus and Condor (VDT 1.1.3 Sever and Client)
- Running two assignments
- Assignment to produce 1 Million “eGamma Bigjets” events by Christmas 2002, all steps (720K done).
- Assignment to produce 500K additional events, cmsim step only (~50k done!).

## Results (so far)

*Time to process *
*1 event: *
*500 sec @ 750 MHz*
*Speedup: *
*Avg factor of 100 speedup during current run*
*Resources: Approximately 230 CPU @750 MHz equiv. *
*Sustained efficiency: *
*about 43.5%*

## Success counts..

## Limitations..

- Breakdowns----scalability ?
- Unforeseen issues (not any more!)
- Larger submissions (30+)
- Parallel g-u-c (FTSH)
- NFS timeouts
- Larger farms
- Disk management
- Failing job’s garbage collection
- Large number of jobs (kills the system, YP server)
- Configuration issues.
- Mainly bottlenecks (nfs, sockets, disk)
- No dead-end (work arounds exist)
- Throttling, code “adjustments”, tune-ups
- Cleanup and start over

## Troubleshooting 

- Several middleware and application software issues/bugs found/fixed/worked-around.
- (RefDB, MCRunJob, MOP, Condor_G, Applications)
- Condor_G/gahp_server failure at higher number of jobs in queue (major issue).
- Gahp_server stop communicating with sites.
- Gahp_server spawns a large number of threads.
- Orphaned jobs (cpu-time wastage/garbage)
- Held jobs (need re-submission).
- Significantly hampers efficiency
- 35-40% of all failures.
- Condor team is working on the problem.
- (kill and restart Condor_G)  ----- Fault Tolerance.

## Effort 

- Deployment and Configuration still not very easy.
- Misleading errors, experts required.
- End-To-End job tracking is tough (tool ?).
- Have to look into several log files and queues to establish the relationship.
- Limitations lead to disaster (experts findout reason of failure).
- Need “baby sitting”  (reducing with time).
- Have to keep an eye on various sites.
- Monitoring and alarming helps.
- Orphaned jobs
- Identified by their “strange” behavior only.
- Need access to remote site for (job, disk) cleanup.
- Missing “scheduler” at Grid level.

## Conclusions & Plans 

- Happy with the results 
- USCMS “production grid” in January 2003
- Improved middleware
- Bugs fixed
- Grid level Scheduling (several options)
- Future development needs understood
- Changes to MCRunJob
- Better tracking
- Changes to MOP (The Show Master)
- More generalized interface
- Multi-site job submission
- BOSS in picture.
- Better organization and closer cooperation
- Shifts, Policies, Bug reporting
# Presentation: 147188

## 6  OrganizationTable of Contents

- 6  OrganizationTable of Contents

-  1	Executive Summary
-  2  Introduction
-  3  Objectives
-  4  System Design
-  5  Work Breakdown Structure
-  6  Organization
-  7  Work Assignments
-  8  Processes
-  9  Phases & Critical Milestones
- 10  Schedule
- 11  Resources
- 12  Products
- 13  Issues
- 14  References

- 6.1  Project Organization
- 6.2  CVO Program Organization
- 6.3  Safety Systems CVIEW 		Project Organization

## 6.1  Project Organization

- FHWA OMC sponsors the development of the CVIEW System.  JHU/APL serves as the Technical Direction Agent and Prime Contractor for the CVIEW Project.  APL is responsible for overall system requirements definition, system design, system testing and ongoing evaluation of system effectiveness. The project organization is shown in the following Organizational Chart.
- The Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) was competitively selected as the SAFER System software subcontractor to perform the software requirements analysis, software design, software implementation, and software testing tasks.  SAIC was also be responsible for the initial operation and maintenance of the SAFER System following deployment of the first build.  SAIC will participate in developing, testing, and implementing the CVIEW System and will provide Operations and Maintenance support for the Maryland and Virginia CVISN Prototype States.

## CVO Program Organization

## Safety Systems CVIEW Project Organization
# Presentation: 359435

## FAST-OS

- Arthur B. (Barney) Maccabe
- Computer Science Department
- The University of New Mexico

- SOS 7
- Durango, Colorado
- March 4, 2003

## FAST-OS

- Most applications show poor scaling on very  large machines
- Scaling must be addressed at all levels
- FAST-OS:  Consider OS and runtime
- Emphasis on near-term systems

- Forum to Address Scalable Technology for runtime and Operating Systems

## FAST-OS People

***Oversight Committee***
***Fred Johnson, DOE***
***Paul Messina, Cal Tech***
***Jose Munoz, DOE***
***Thomas Sterling, Cal Tech***
***Rick Stevens, ANL***
***Steering committee***
***Barney Maccabe, UNM***
***Ron Brightwell, SNL***
***Al Geist, ORNL***
***Terry Jones, LLNL***
***Rusty Lusk, ANL***
***Ron Minnich, LANL***

## Forum Activities

***Web page ******http://www.cs.unm.edu/~fastos***
***February 2002***
***WIMPS workshop @ Bodega Bay***
***1⁄2 day FAST-OS workshop***
***Primary focus on organization***
***July 2002***
***11⁄2 days in Chicago***
***30 people from labs, industry, and academics***
***Report focuses on issues***
***October 2002***
***1⁄2 day workshop in Santa Fe ***
***Commodity versus Specialized approaches***

## Issues (1 of 4)

***Fault tolerance is critical***
***System size and application run times imply that apps will encounter faults***
***All levels (including apps) must deal with faults***
***Programming models***
***Need to support a variety of models***
***Models for 100,000 processors***
***Breaking the legacy straight jacket***
***What comes after MPI?***

## Issues (2 of 4)

***OS Structure***
***Protection boundaries***
***Global/Local OS split***
***How far can we take lightweight approaches***
***Split between OS and runtime system?***
***APIs***
***App/Runtime; Runtime/OS***
***Tools: compilers, debuggers***
***Specific functions***
***Process management and scheduling***
***Security, QoS, Invariants, etc.***

## Issues (3 of 4)

***What is Scalability?***
***Which runtime and OS services should scale***
***Performance nearly independent of size?***
***Reliability nearly independent of size?***
***Future hardware***
***Do we need different OS/runtime for different systems?***
***Hardware support for OS/runtime***
***protection***
***reliable networks***
***collective operations***

## Issues (4 of 4)

***Application requirements***
***Identify critical apps***
***Measure needs***
***Metrics***
***How do we measure success?***
***Programmatic***
***Roles for academics, vendors, and labs***
***Support testbeds (e.g., Chiba City)***
***Don't choose a winner too early in the process***

## Next Steps	

***Next general meeting will be May or June***
***Goal is to define the research agenda***