# Presentation: 677122

## CDF Detector Operations Budget and Resource Planning

- Rob Roser
- IFC Meeting
- October 17, 2005

## FY05 Year in Review

- Accelerator performed well and met their metric (goals)
- CDF saw luminosities as high as 150e30!
- Began slow process of constructing a trigger table for luminosities of 200-300 e30 – requires setting physics priorities
- Completed installation and commissioning of most upgrades
- level 2 trigger decision crate
- Hardware Event builder
- New firmware for TDC’s – modified hardware
- New secondary vertex track trigger made substantial progress
- Central preradiator – a new detector system installed in 2004 shutdown  part of stable operations since the beginning of 05
- No significant problem of note in FY05 – We collected data with an average efficiency of 85%

## Integrated Luminosity

- 1328 pb-1 Delivered

- 1063 pb-1 Recorded

## Data Taking Efficiency

## Budget Process

- CDF requested $1.4 million for Detector Operations
- Expect to get most of what we ask for – a remarkable demonstration by the lab given its budget situation and financial pressures from future initiatives
- Reminder that much of detector operations deals with fixed costs (flammable gas, cryogens, computer maintenance...)  ~$900k can be written now to cover next year
- Visitor budget held constant, no where near sufficient to honor all requests
- Working with the lab to get additional technical staff to reduce burden on scientists where appropriate

## M&S Budget

| Category | Explanation | FY05 Actual | FY06 Req. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Computing | On-line DAQ, Level 3, licensing, slow controls | $500k | $350k |
| Consumables | Argon, Ethane, LN2, He, Alcohol | $600k | $450k |
| Time and Materiallabor (T&M) | Electrical, rigging, HVAC Maintenance | $50k | $25k |
| Infrastructure Maintenance | HVAC, Compressors, Engines, pumps | $200k | $225k |
| General Operating | phones, pagers, vehicles, office supplies misc catchall | $200k | $200k |
| Mechanical Support | Pipes, fittings, bolts, tools, safety | $100k | $75k |
| Upgrades | Installation Costs (e.g. Scaffolding..) | $150k | $25k |
| Total |  | $1,800k | $1,350k |

## Last Years Budget Review

- From the spreadsheet I gave you...
- FY05 Actual Cost was $2.0M (for non offline)
- Costs based on previous agreed upon combination of salary and M&S
- Actual Spending was within a few $k of FY05 budget projection
- Major expenditures last year included:
- Trailer recertification
- COT Gas filtering system
- New HVAC Water Chiller
- Costs associated with upgrade installations complete

## Data Taking Operations

- Difficult to keep enthusiasm for taking data over an 8-10 year data run
- Working on ways to either make it easier to participate or reduce the scientific effort required
- Testing a remote control room.
- Reduces travel
- Covers difficult midnight shift here
- Working with the lab to replace some positions currently staffed by scientists with trained Fermilab technical staff on shift

## Evaluating Personnel Resource Availability

- http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/program_planning/P5/P5_Sept2005/HEPAP_Subpanel_P5_Meeting.html

## Summary Plot of Needs

## “The Shot Heard Round the World”

## Summary of Needsin FTE’s

|  | 2007 | 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Operations | 55 | 55 |
| Offline | 26 | 20 |
| Management | 10 | 10 |
| Algorithms | 35 | 26 |
| Total Service | 126 | 111 |

- FTE  fraction of _total_ working week.
- NOT: fraction of research time; NOT fraction of 40 hour week!

## Summary of Subgroups...(needs)in FTE’s

|  | 2007 | 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Core Physics | 81 | 64 |
| Total Service | 126 | 111 |
| Core+Service | 207 | 175 |

## “Person-power” survey

- Spreadsheet developed as first stage in DØ 2005-2007 MOU(that we stole)
- Request FTE(2.) effort dedicated to CDF vs Year
- Faculty, scientist, postdoc, student
- Request details of institutional commitments
- Notes:
- 2008-2009 less certain...
- FTE  fraction of _total_ working week.
- NOT: fraction of research time; NOT fraction of 40 hour week!
- Responses from 53/57 institutes

## Results of Survey by Countryin FTE’s

|  | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U.S. | 242.8 | 221.2 | 176.6 | 110.2 | 82.8 |
| Spain  | 11.8 | 13.2 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Italy | 63.4 | 59.7 | 52.2 | 42.2 | 41.6 |
| Canada | 15.7 | 15.8 | 9.3 | 5.1 | 2.1 |
| Switz. | 6.6 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2 | 2 |
| Germany | 15 | 10.6 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 2.6 |
| Russia | 0.6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Korea | 12.9 | 9.9 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| U.K. | 26.5 | 25.5 | 18.3 | 10.6 | 5.2 |
| Japan | 21.7 | 18.2 | 17 | 13.3 | 8.8 |

## Results of survey: 2005-2007

**- Fall off for both US and non-US roughly consistent with HEPAP survey**

|  |                CDF |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Year | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| non-US | 100% |  91% |  74% |
| US | 100% |  91% |  73% |
| all.expt | 100% |  91% |  73% |
| HEPAP | 100% |  88% |  69% |
| FTEs |  434 |   381 | 304 |

## Comparison of FTE availability and needs: 2007

**Sufficient effort to operate experiments and support a broad physics program**

- Assumes people spend 50% of time on “service” and 50% doing “physics”

| “Service” |   126 |
| --- | --- |
| “Core” physics |  86 |
| Total needs 1:
    (service*2) | 252 |
| Total needs 2: 
 (service+“core”)  | 207 |
| Available FTE | 304 |
| Available-needs 1: | 52 |
| Available-needs 2: | 97 |

## Results for 2009

-        Calculated from 2007 MOU FTEs using HEPAP ratio for 2009/2007

|  |  Expt. |    CDF |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Available FTEs | non-US | 75 |
|  | US | 116 |
|  | all.expt | 191 |
| Needed FTEs | 1: service*2 | 222 |
|  | 2: service+core | 175 |
| Available -needed FTEs | 1: | -31 |
|  | 2: | 16 |

- If we used the survey,  Total available is 162 FTE

## Conclusions

- CDF is operating well.  FY05 was a very good year for us!
- Spending has been in line with our budget requests.
- Staffing at the moment looks ok – but requires constant attention and management to insure we are able to cover our needs

## BACKUP

## Detector Operations Detail 

| Management | 5 | 250 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Alarms and Controls | 1 | 100 |
| Online and Data Acquisition | 8 | 350 |
| Data Quality Monitoring | 8 | 110 |
| Silicon Detectors | 17 | 725 |
| Outer Tracker | 5 | 230 |
| Calorimeters | 14 | 260 |
| Muons | 13 | 300 |

**Subgroup**

**# People**

**Total % FTE/subgroup**

| Time of Flight | 2 | 50 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Luminosity Detector | 2 | 100 |
| Trigger | 5 | 250 |
| Level 1 Trigger | 7 | 225 |
| Level 2 Trigger | 8 | 130 |
| Event Builder/Level 3 Trigger | 7 | 225 |
| Total Scientific Effort | 123 | 3300 |
| Infrastructure Support | 21 | 2040 |
| Shift | 312 | 2241 |

## Diving Down in Operations

- Calorimeter Subsystem is comprised of the following categories...
- Each one has an estimate associated with it.
- For CDF, the numbers are shown to the right...

|  | People  | FTE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Central EM | 1 | 0.3 |
| Central hadronic | 1 | 0.3 |
| Electronics | 4 | 0.3 |
| Forward | 2 | 0.4 |
| Far Forward | 1 | 0.3 |
| Timing | 2 | 0.2 |
| Leadership | 2 | 0.5 |
| HV | 1 | 0.3 |
| TOTAL | 14 | 2.6 |

## Core Physics Analysis

- Picked 10 physics analyses that are scientifically compelling measurements and demonstrate the potential of the collider program
- a combination of precision measurements and searches/discovery potential
- Searches
- SM and MSSM Higgs,  SUSY searches, Z’, LED, *B**s** * 
- Precision
- Top mass, Vtb, W mass, Vtb, *B**s* mixing, *B**s* lifetime

## Algorithm Development

|  |  | CDF |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ALGORITHMS | FY05 | FY07 | FY09 |  |  |  |
| Muon Reconstruction | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |  |  |  |
| Tracking | 8.9 | 5.1 | 3.4 |  |  |  |
| Calorimetry | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.2 |  |  |  |
| Taus | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.9 |  |  |  |
| Jet Energy Scale | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2.8 |  |  |  |
| b-tagging | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.3 |  |  |  |
| Trigger | 6.5 | 7.8 | 4.1 |  |  |  |
| Simulation | 5.5 | 3.0 | 2.7 |  |  |  |
| Luminosity | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 |  |  |  |
| High Level Data Handling | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 |  |  |  |
| Infrastructure | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |  |  |  |
| TOTAL ALGORITHMS | 47.2 | 35.4 | 25.6 |  |  |  |

## Core Physics Analysis

|  |  | CDF |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PHYSICS | FY05 | FY07 | FY09 | FY05 |  |  |
| Bs (Mixing, Rare Decay, Lifetime) | 18.5 | 16.0 | 13.0 | 22.0 |  |  |
| EW(W mass) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 13.0 |  |  |
| Higgs(SM and SUSY) | 17.0 | 17.0 | 15.5 | 19.5 |  |  |
| New Phenomena(Trilepton,Squarks & | 14.5 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 13.0 |  |  |
|     Gluinos, Stop&Sbottom, LED, Z') |   |  |   |   |  |  |
| Top (Mass and Single) | 19.5 | 17.5 | 11.5 | 22.5 |  |  |
| Core physics management | 7.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 |  |  |
| Tevatron Combination | 0.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 |  |  |
| Godparents/Ed.Boards | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |  |  |
| TOTAL PHYSICS | 88.5 | 81.0 | 64.0 | 101.3 |  |  |