# Presentation: 814143

## FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-GoalProgram PlanWilliam F. BroglieNovember 16, 2006

**FY 09 *****Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal*****Program Plan*****William F. Broglie*****November 16, 2006**

- Workforce Management

- Administrative Services

- Acquisition & Grants

- Financial Services

- Facilities

- IT  Services

## Overview

**FY 09 Program Plan Vision for 2013**
- Cost effective, value-added service provider-of-choice for workforce management, acquisition and grants, facilities, financial, IT and administrative services.
- Long range plans identifying future requirements for:
**Facilities**
**Information Technology**
**Workforce Management**

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Require IT Long-Range Plan to be Developed for FY 10-14 PPBES

## Overview

**Overview**

**FY09 – FY13 Program Plan Objectives**
- Programs and services comply with legal, regulatory and departmental mandates; and enable NOAA and its partners to efficiently accomplish NOAA mission objectives.
- Process improvements enhance quality, cost-effectiveness and timeliness of services and reflect best management practices
**Acquisition and Grants:  **timely awards, aligned with NOAA’s mission; effective oversight and administration to maximize outcomes.
**Financial and Administrative** **Services** and systems:  compliance with legal/regulatory requirements; enable informed management decision-making.
**Facilities**:  safe, sustainable, and modern; with increased opportunities for collaboration and integration within NOAA and with NOAA’s partners.
**IT: **Secure, sound, and robust infrastructure and processes to advance NOAA mission; leverages NOAA-wide economies of scale; enhances workforce collaboration and sharing of data and knowledge.
**Workforce Management:** value-added systems and processes promoting both a highly-skilled workforce and Merit System principles in support of NOAA mission goals.

## Overview

**FY09-FY13 Program Plan Achievements**
**Acquisition and Grants:  **Integrated and sustained BPR improvements
**Administrative Services:**  Compliance with requirements:  HSPD-12, deemed exports, competitive sourcing, personal property.
**Facilities:  **Completion/occupancy of major facility projects (Pacific Region Center and La Jolla); facility condition index improved through targeted restoration investments; long-range planning process.
**Financial Services:  **End-to-End Resource Management System implemented; Budget BPR recommendations fully implemented/integrated.
**Information Technology:  **Security/Certification & Accreditation services integrated across NOAA; NOAA Enterprise MIS implemented.
**Workforce Management:  **WFM BPR recommendations partially  implemented; systems promote employee competency aligned with NOAA business requirements; e-OPF implemented.

## Overview

**FY09-FY13 Program Plan Shortfalls/Excesses**
_***NO***_** EXCESSES!**
**Program-Specific Shortfalls:**** **
**Administrative Services:**  Unfunded/under-funded mandates with rising expectations/ requirements:  deemed exports, HSPD-12, personal property, and security/guard services.
**Facilities:**  Inadequate recapitalization funding stream to support sustained execution of facility long term plan.
**Financial Services:**  Unfunded requirements for Working Capital Fund full contribution and CBS system enhancements.
**Information Technology:**  Unfunded requirements for redundancy in critical infrastructure (e.g., single points of failure,  network infrastructure, public web services, and electronic mail services).  Need for fully-compliant C&A and IT Security program.  Inadequate resources to develop and execute long-range IT recapitalization/modernization plan and transformation of NOAA’s web.
**Workforce Management:**  Sustained funding stream for systems and programs (e.g., integrated human resources management system, learning management system and competency models).

## Funding

- NOTES:
- Fiscal and programming guidance concerning facility projects: Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, Fairbanks & BIGELOW homeporting improvements.
- Fiscal and programming guidance concerning transfer of funding from Leadership Sub-Goal to the Program Support Sub-Goal (Information Technology Services Program).

## Details

**Strategy to Meet Sub-Goal Objectives and Fiscal/Programming Guidance**
- Funds allocated in accordance with fiscal and programming guidance and in consideration of Annual Guidance Memo and Strategic Plan.
- Identified significant, extensive Gaps with no excess capacity and no capabilities that could be eliminated in out-years.
- Utilized the Program Operating Plans (POPs) to evaluate to what extent priorities could be accomplished within the Current Program and Revised Program funding detailed in Serial 3.
- Above Core requirements identified and prioritized.
- Reallocate resources and funding from Line Offices and Mission Goals to support major projects:  PRC and La Jolla.
- Maintain required programs and services to meet or exceed legal, regulatory and departmental mandates.
- Implement BPR recommendations, and create a climate of continuous process assessments that supports end-to-end business process improvements.

## Details  Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and Ability to Meet

| Acquisition/Grants: | FY 09 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sustainment of Grants on Line and Grants BPR | G | G |
| Fully implemented Acquisitions BPR | Y | Y |
| Integrated planning processes for acquisitions and grants: AGO and NOAA customers | Y | Y |
| “Rational” work environment for AGO employees | R | Y |
| Administrative Services: |  |  |
| Implement competitive sourcing feasibility study plan | G | G |
| Comply with deemed exports requirements | G | Y |
| Comply with HSPD-12 requirements | Y | Y |
| Comply with personal property program requirements | Y | Y |

## Details  Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and Ability to Meet

| Facilities:    | FY 09 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Integrated long-range facility modernization planning  | G | G |
| Sustained funding strategy to support long-term facility modernization requirements | R | R |
| Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, & BIGELOW homeporting completed | G | G |
| Complete Pribilofs cleanup; ongoing monitoring | G | G |
| Initiate redevelopment of Beaufort, WRC, Montlake, Norfolk, Miami | R | R |

| Financial Services:  | FY 09 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintain clean audit opinion, no material findings | G | G |
| Implementation of E2E resource mgmt system | G | Y |
| CBS enhancements supported | R | R |

| Information Technology: | FY 09 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Integrated Enterprise-level IT Security, including C&A | Y | Y |
| Phased implementation/development of MIS | G | G |
| Sound, secure (and redundant) network/infrastructure | R | R |
| Long-range IT capital planning process | R | R |
| Implemented OneNOAA Web presence | R | R |
| Workforce Management: |  |  |
| Robust workforce planning (including competency development) capabilities | Y | Y |
| Implementation of BPR recommendations (hiring; training & development) | Y | Y |
| Fully implemented HSPD-12 and e-OPF | Y | Y |

**Details **** **Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and Ability to Meet

## How Program Capabilities Were Prioritized:
Priorities identified in NOAA 2006-2011 Strategic Plan, April 2005
Recognized AGM and Fiscal/Program Guidance Priorities
Emphasized need to sustain/maintain current capacities (assumes inflation increases to sustain capacities will be budgeted separately).
Utilized POPs to evaluate capabilities and capacities across Mission Support at current and 100% level.
Items eliminated in FY08 DOC Passback re-evaluated.
Evolving program requirements (Deemed Exports, HSPD-12, competitive sourcing feasibility studies) addressed.
Integrated Priority Lists items evaluated for (a) applicability to Program Support and (b) priority against current program.

- Priorities identified in NOAA 2006-2011 Strategic Plan, April 2005
- Recognized AGM and Fiscal/Program Guidance Priorities
- Emphasized need to sustain/maintain current capacities (assumes inflation increases to sustain capacities will be budgeted separately).
- Utilized POPs to evaluate capabilities and capacities across Mission Support at current and 100% level.
- Items eliminated in FY08 DOC Passback re-evaluated.
- Evolving program requirements (Deemed Exports, HSPD-12, competitive sourcing feasibility studies) addressed.
- Integrated Priority Lists items evaluated for (a) applicability to Program Support and (b) priority against current program.

**Details**

## How Program Capabilities Were Integrated Across Programs:
Program capabilities analyzed for duplication, low priority services and/or availability of more cost effective methods of providing services.
Integration across Program Support programs for select initiatives:  HSPD-12, personal property/Laptops/PII 
Facility requirements integrated with other program directions (fleet modernization, etc.) and balanced against other competing program priorities to ensure integration.

- Program capabilities analyzed for duplication, low priority services and/or availability of more cost effective methods of providing services.
- Integration across Program Support programs for select initiatives:  HSPD-12, personal property/Laptops/PII
- Facility requirements integrated with other program directions (fleet modernization, etc.) and balanced against other competing program priorities to ensure integration.

**Details**

## Compliance with Guidance

| ISSUE | Compliance |
| --- | --- |
| Provide recommendation for annual funding level for real property recapitalization.  Include analysis and rationale for proposed level.  Based on recommended funding level, develop recommendation for projects with start dates, to be funded | 
 |
| In coordination with Weather and Water and the National Weather Service, fund Weather Forecast Office (WFO) lease costs.  Provide a plan for the WFO Facilities Management Staff. |  |
| Working with the Satellite sub-goal, provide plan for permanent solution to facility requirements for Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (CDAS). |  |
| Fund homeporting requirement for the Bigelow. |  |
| Provide details on impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure for network infrastructure (ITS) |  |
| Mission Support goal to provide recommendation on the Commerce Business System (CBS) funding shortfall. |  |
| Various technical adjustments (inter-program realignments) |  |

## Compliance with Guidance

| ISSUE | Compliance |
| --- | --- |
| Working with all goals and subgoals who fund personnel who will occupy the PRC and La Jolla, transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements.  (Climate Goal is Above Core; Satellite not discussed) | 
 |
| Fund IT Security Centralized Certification & Accreditation (C&A)  (Listed in Above Core) |  |
| Complete implementation of e-OPF as mandated by OPM. (Listed in Above Core) |  |
| Implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12. (Listed in Above Core) |  |
| Develop competency models to develop/validate competencies in NOAA  mission-critical occupations. (Listed in Above Core) |  |

## Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Level

**Background:**  Previous recommendation for sustained funding strategy for facility recapitalization/modernization was supported by NEP/NEC and reflected in Program Guidance.
**Serial 3 Guidance** requires recommendation of (1) annual funding level, with rationale and analysis; and (2) specific projects to be funded under this level (projects listed in backup).
**Recommendation of Methodology:**
- Adjusted** Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) **methodology:  Annual funding requirements calculated as aggregate Current Replacement Value (CRV) of NOAA owned facility portfolio divided by facility life.
- Research indicates 50 years average facility life as an accepted target---used by DoD and NASA.
- NOAA aggregate CRV (for owned facilities) is approximately $1.77B based on 2005 portfolio valuation.
**FRR:  (CRV) / 50 (years average facility life)** = **$35M for **_**2005**_.
- FRR must be adjusted annually based on re-valuation of aggregate CRV of NOAA-owned facility portfolio.
- Design and Engineering (D&E) requirements also must be included to yield adjusted FRR.

## Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Level

- Total Facility Recapitalization Rate for program years:

- Recapitalization methodology assumes that there is adequate funding available to address the sustainment and restoration requirements.  Inadequate sustainment and restoration reduces facility life, accelerating need for recapitalization.

- *

- * Phased implementation recommended; FY 09 – 10.  See next slide

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Accept Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) as methodology for calculating recapitalization requirements.

## Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Projects

- Phased Implementation of Recapitalization Funding:  FY 09-10
- Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan:  FY 2008-2017

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Approve phased funding strategy and recommended projects to be funded under strategy.

## Compliance with Guidance: Single Points of Failure

**Elimination of Single Points of Failure**
- The elimination of single points of failure will improve NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web services (PWS), and electronic mail services.
- Not implementing will negatively impact NOAA’s ability to accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their goals.
- Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public.  This includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet.  For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public.
- The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the Line Office local area networks (LANs) and increase the IT security risk to all NOAA systems, including networks.

## Major Program Adjustments

- Major Program Adjustments (Compliance with Fiscal/Program Guidance):

## Major Program Adjustments:Funding for PRC & LaJolla Projects

**Program Guidance:**
- “...transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements...”
- Benefit/Risk:  	_PRC_ – Consolidates programs and replaces inadequate 			facilities; large requirement impacts 	Mission Goal capability.
- 		        	_La Jolla_ – Provides safe facility, sustains programs and strategic 		program relationships; large requirement impacts Mission Goal 		capability.
- Transfers _**from**_ Mission Goals and satellite sub-goal based on planned occupancy (people) of facilities by Goal/Program:

## Major Program Adjustments:Funding for PRC & LaJolla Projects (cont’d)

**PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS:**

| ($M) | FY 09 | FY 10 | FY 11 | FY 12 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Pacific Regional Center (PRC) | ($6.0) | $61.3 | $68.9 |  |  |
| La Jolla SW Fisheries Science Ctr | ($31.0) | $50.0 |  |  |  |
| TOTAL | ($37.0) | $111.3 | $68.9 |  |  |

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Accept proposed adjustments to fund PRC and La Jolla projects as approved by NEP/NEC.

- Transfers _**to**_ Program Support for PRC and La Jolla projects

## Major Program AdjustmentsFairbanks CDAS

**Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station:**
- Background:  DoC Passback eliminated funding, based on no long-term primary use for facility beyond 2013.  Alternative solution approved by NEP/NEC:  Temporary, modular buildings with shorter life span.
- Benefit/Risk:  Alternative most likely to get DoC support, but is only a temporary solution.
- Out-year costs (current estimate: $20M-25M) beyond 2013 to shut down and dispose facility.
- Fund development of detailed implementation plan and refined cost estimates in FY07 through NESDIS PAC funding.
**PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT:**

| ($M) | FY 09 | FY 10 | FY 11 | FY 12 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fairbanks CDAS | ($10.0) | $15.0 |  |  |  |

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Accept proposed adjustment to fund Fairbanks temporary solution.

## Major Program AdjustmentsBIGELOW Homeporting

**BIGELOW Homeporting**
- Background:  BIGELOW commissioned in FY2006; larger vessel—longer, wider, and with a deeper draft—than ship replaced. Deeper draft requires dredging of the existing Woods Hole berthing area and channel. Existing pier and bulkhead need to be replaced to safely support ship operations.
- Benefit/Risk:  Leverages existing facilities and collaboration opportunities; will require out-year, periodic dredging (≈$1.5M every 10 yrs.).
**PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT:**

| ($M) | FY 09 | FY 10 | FY 11 | FY 12 | FY 13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BIGELOW Homeporting | $6.3 | $8.2 |  |  |  |

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Accept proposed adjustment to fund BIGELOW homeport improvements (dredging and pier replacement).

## Above Core

**Rationale for Prioritization of Above Core Requirements**
- Responsiveness to fiscal and program guidance
- Impact on accomplishment of program mission:  sustainment of capabilities vs. enhancement
- Current clarity of requirements
**Methodology for Prioritization:**
- Segregated ORF vs. PAC
- ORF — 4 Tiers: (1) Required to Comply with Fiscal/Program Guidance; (2) - (4) based on mission impact and clarity of requirements
- PAC — 2 Tiers based on mission impact and requirements clarity** **
**Impact and Risk of Not Funding Above Core Requirements**:  Addressed in Individual Quad Charts in Backup Information
**Potential Unfunded Requirements** (Not Currently Fully Defined)
- HSPD-12 (IT and Facility impacts)
- IT Recapitalization

## Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—ORF 

**TIER ONE:  Compliance with Fiscal and Programming Guidance**

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Fund Tier One Above Core items required for Compliance with Fiscal/Programming Guidance.

## Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—ORF

**TIER TWO:  Sustain Current Program Capabilities**

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Fund Tier Two Above Core items required to sustain current program capabilities.

## Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—ORF

**TIER THREE:  Improve Current Program Capabilities**

## Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—ORF

**TIER FOUR Priorities**

**NOTE:  Requirements identified in this tier do not necessarily mean the requirement itself is lower priority, but may indicate additional**** ****analysis is required, or other alternatives to support capability exist.**

## Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—PAC

**TIER ONE:**

**TIER TWO:**

- NEP/NEC Recommendation:

- NEP/NEC Guidance Requested:  Fund Tier One (PAC) Above Core level to support Facility Recapitalization requirements.

## Backup Information

## Above Core Quads:  Tier One—ORF

**Investments **
**Required to Comply with **
**Fiscal and Programming Guidance**

## Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE Electronic Official Personnel Files (e-OPF)

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE ****Electronic Official Personnel Files (e-OPF)**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  HR Programs
- REQUIREMENT:  OPM (e-Gov Initiative)
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Funding for annual licensing fees
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Compliance with OPM milestones

- Annual licensing fee ($272K) requires consistent funding source
- FY 06:  Infrastructure established for e-OPF from 01/01/06 forward
- FY 06 funds contributed by LO/SOs are sufficient to scan 44% of existing folders during FY 07-08
- US, COs, PPI, OAR, NMAO fully funded
- NMFS is 73% funded ($56K needed to fully fund)
- NOS ($79K), NWS ($317K) (or appropriate Programs) must provide funding to meet OPM requirements between FY 07 and FY 11

- If Adjustment made, employees have immediate access to personal data from any web browser; NOAA has superior retrieval capability for COOP; time for transfer of records reduced from weeks or months to near real time; potential to free up FTE for higher priority HR activities.
- If Adjustment not made, e-OPF has no consistent funding source which could result in OPFs being inaccessible to HR staff and other NOAA employees.  Funding would then be needed to print and reestablish paper OPFs to meet legal requirements and conduct HR operations.
- Risk:  LOs may not fund 100% back-file conversions prior to FY 2009; this would require Programs to make up the difference to meet OPM timeline of 50% by FY 08, 20% in FY 09-10, and 10% in out years

## Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORECentralized Certification &Accreditation (C&A) Services

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITY: IT Security
- REQUIREMENT: Centralized Certification & Accreditation (C&A) Services
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement centralized C&A team to ensure consistency in the review of C&A packages, complete certification, and provide controls testing for each system prior to submission to Commerce
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents

- Standardize C&A process throughout NOAA          Oct 2007
- Capability of providing a suite of C&A services       Oct 2007
- Automate C&A process		                  Oct 2008
- Provide C&A dashboard capability	                  Mar 2009

**If program adjustment is made: **
**Compliance with Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and Commerce IT Security Policy**
**Maintain 100% of NOAA IT systems that have a current C&A**
**If program adjustment is **_**not**_** made:**
**‘****Out of compliance’ with July 12, 2006 OMB memo M-06-19 from Karen Evans (Ofc of E-Gov & IT) that requires agencies to meet existing security requirements (e.g., correct security weaknesses in stead-state investments) before new funds are spent on system development, modernization, or enhancement**
**Restrict public access to hazardous weather warnings and hurricane tracking information during peak demand periods when capability of enterprise security systems is exceeded**
**Retain IT Security material weakness (DOC OIG)**
**Delay implementation of IT Security Architecture by 2 to 3 years**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE **** Develop Competency Models**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital
- REQUIREMENT:  5 U.S.C. 1103(c); Human Capital Initiative of PMA; E.O. 13352 (Cooperative Conservation)
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Fund development of competency models for 25 of NOAA’s highest priority and/or most populous job series and work roles to support workforce planning
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Number of valid competency models developed

- FY 07- 08:  WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to develop/validate NOAA foundational competency model, DOC-assigned competency models, and other high-priority models using existing interagency agreement with OPM; complete skills gap assessments for priority models
- FY 09:  WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to validate competency model for Cooperative Conservation Competencies and develop/validate an  additional 5 competency models; complete skills gap assessments for priority models
- FY 10-13: WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to develop/validate an  additional 5 competency models each year; complete skills gap assessments for priority models
- Ease of using models for skills gap assessments and workforce planning dependent on nature of automated competency management system available

- If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to add 26 validated competency models to those developed in FY 07 & FY 08 increasing our ability to determine skills gaps and develop workforce plans to fill those gaps
- Filling skills gaps helps meet the AGM guidance for “A more flexible, diverse and mobile workforce with minimal skill gaps”
- Validated competency models can serve as a basis for valid QuickHire and interview questions, training needs assessments, succession planning, and other HR processes.
- If Adjustment not made, NOAA not having valid data to use for workforce planning (closing skills gaps), recruitment, training, other HR processes
- Barriers to implementation include the time resources required of NOAA managers & employees to develop and validate models

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 ****(Workforce Management)**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  Human Resources Programs
- REQUIREMENT: Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- 5 FTE and funding to support the human resource requirements created by HSPD-12
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Timely security clearances
- Error rates
- Hiring cycle time

- FY09, Q2:  Fill 5 ZS-IV personnel security positions
- Positions will:
- Initiate and monitor process for all levels of security clearance requests for new employees
- Review and adjudicate pre-employment suitability investigation results with LO hiring officials (new with HSPD-12; post-employment suitability has been an on-going responsibility)
- Serve as PIV sponsor for all new hire actions
- Ensure that the appropriate on-line training is completed
- Complete appropriate activities related to badging and re-badging
- Other NOAA players include the IT Services, Administrative Services, and Facilities Programs

- If adjustment made, MS-WMP able to process 100% of new security requirements timely while carrying out on-going workload
- If adjustment not made, security-related work likely to be delayed while current staff works to keep up with volume and still carry out other HR activities; quality and accuracy of all work suffers; other HR activities (e.g., hiring) already being delayed to focus on security
- New employees may not be able to enter on duty in a timely fashion until all required security clearances are completed.  High potential to lose candidates  to other positions or agencies if process too slow
- In mid-1990s, MS-WMP gave up 6 FTE to DOC for security-related work.  Work has returned with HSPD-12, but not the FTEs
- No direct dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 (Administrative Services)

- PROGRAM:  Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY:  Logistics
- REQUIREMENT:  HSPD-12 Credentialing
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Implementation of a new standardized credentialing process to comply with OMB-05-24
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Number/percentage of employees and equipment processed annually to remain compliant

**Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 ****(Administrative Services)**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- DOC has selected the GSA Managed Service Office to implement the Program; NOAA retains specific abjudication responsibilities
- Smartcards, background checks, card readers, servers, installation and maintenance, training
- Card implementation begins in October 2006; full implementation by October 2008
- FY09-FY13 primarily for ongoing maintenance, annual employee rebadging, logical access for computers, and equipment replacement and upgrades

- The program is designed to enhance security, reduce identity fraud, and protect personal privacy
- Personnel security at risk, identity fraud not deterred
- Risks/barriers to implementation – interfaces to legacy systems

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Above Core Quads:Tier One—PAC

**Investments **
**Required to Fund Facility Recapitalization Requirements**
**(using Facility Recapitalization Rate)**

## ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1): Facility Recapitalization Requirements

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction
- REQUIREMENT:  Facility Recapitalization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Implementation of a sustained funding strategy to address NOAA facility recapitalization requirements
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved portfolio facility condition index
- Elimination of substantial backlog of repair projects ($50-60M)

**ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1): ****Facility Recapitalization Requirements**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Phased implementation of funding level in FY 09-10.
- Initial years’ funding supports (1) delineation of program of  requirements and analysis of alternatives, and (2) design.
- Specific schedules and milestones for each project still need to be developed.  High level implementation schedule reflected on next slide.

- Enables NOAA to replace owned facilities that have reached the end of their useful life.
- Provides modern, state-of-the-art, and safe working conditions
- Risks:
- Funding level is substantial and will face severe budget challenge.
- Unclear where possible offsets would come, and at what expense.

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1): Facility Recapitalization Requirements

- Projects Recommended Under Recapitalization Funding:  Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan:  FY 2008-2017

- Background:

## Above Core Quads:  Tier Two—ORF 

**Investments **
**Required to Sustain **
**Current Services/Capabilities**

## Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Guard Service Contract

- PROGRAM: Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY:  Logistics
- REQUIREMENT: NOAA-wide Guard Services Contracts
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Funding to pay for three Guard Service contracts covering NCR, Boulder and Seattle
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Proper physical security for NOAA facilities and staff
- Timely payment of contracts

**Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: ****Guard Service Contract**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Contracts require funding in first quarter each year
- Guard Service is “Must Pay” for NOAA

- Actual funding was previously provided through the Working Capital Fund, and was first requested in FY07.  FY06 funding came via a reprogramming and a DOC subsidy.   FY07 funding will be short by over $2.0M.
- Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of capability
- Required payments produce a shortfall for other critical Program Support requirements

## Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Working Capital Fund (Financial)

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  NOAA Centralized Payments
- REQUIREMENT: Centralized Payments/WCF
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Funding mechanism to process NOAA centralized payments
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Accurate on-time end of year close out
- Timely allocation of appropriation

- DOC requires funding in first quarter each year
- WCF is “Must Pay” for NOAA

- Actual funding for assessments have not kept pace with the bill
- Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing loss of capability
- Required payments produces a shortfall for other Common Services requirements as well

## Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Learning Management System

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  Strategic Management of Human Capital
- REQUIREMENT:  5 CFR; BPR implementation
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Fund the NOAA portion of the DOC Learning Management System including a competency management functionality
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Compliance with OPM reporting requirements

- FY 2007 Q1-Q2:  DOC competition for LMS; develop requirements for competency management module
- FY 2007 Q3-Q4:  Implement new LMS
- FY 2008:  Implement competency management module
- FY 09-13:  Maintain LMS licenses

- If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to fully support the new Training and Development business process to meet new OPM training data reporting requirements, provide cost-effective training to employees, and support  the competency assessment and skills gap analysis required for workforce planning.
- If Adjustment not made, NOAA will not be assured of a having a business process and system to meet OPM data reporting requirements or to efficiently support workforce planning via competency management functionality; funding would be dependent on direct bill.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core: Commerce Business SystemOracle Licenses

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core: ****Commerce Business System****Oracle Licenses**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  Accounting Services and Funds Management
- REQUIREMENT: Commerce Business System
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Oracle license renewal
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved funds control
- Accurate and timely financial information

- FY 2009 - 2013
- Two year term purchase of Oracle internet application server licenses to support NOAA users of CBS and Grants On Line

- Supports new DOC Web Enabled CBS Application to NOAA
- Enables term purchases of  Oracle Internet Application Server Licenses
- System at risk with obsolete software
- Above Core request serves as place holder until accurate costing is received from OCIO

## Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: End to End Resource Management System

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: ****End to End Resource Management System**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  PPBES Management Information System
- REQUIREMENT: End to End Resource Management System
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Maintenance and sustainment costs
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Accurate and timely financial information for program managers

- Provides improved budget development and production; including budget justification and all necessary exhibits
- Enables interface with Commerce Business System and consolidates Reporting System
- Eliminates separate system inefficiency and costly labor-intensive processes
- Leverages integrated investment by connecting to mission support system support architecture for NOAA’s planning, programming, budgeting and execution processes
- Fewer unlinked systems support all phases of PPBES

- FY 2009-FY 2013
- System Maintenance
- Implementation of operational system
- Improves the availability and quality of data available for PPBES

## Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Elimination of Single Points of Failure (SSMC Network Infrastructure & Public Web Services)

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**GOAL: Program Support**
**PROGRAM: Information Technology Services**
**CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations**
**REQUIREMENT: Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure and Public Web Services (PWS)**
**DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement fully-redundant SSMC network backbone with built-in failover, and mirrored web clusters at 7 U.S. locations**
**PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services Availability**

**Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: ****Elimination of Single Points of Failure ****(SSMC Network Infrastructure & Public Web Services)**

- Complete implementation of a 10 Gigabit Ethernet SSMC backbone & 10 Gigabit Ethernet Wash DC metropolitan area network (MAN) 			2011
- Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network		2013

- If program adjustment is _not_ made:
- NOAA data products (provided via SSMC and/or other locations) will become unavailable during a power failure or when construction/utility equipment (e.g., backhoe) severs the SSMC internet connection. For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public during the time of need.
- Customers and the general public will become displeased with the data unavailability, which in turn becomes front-page, above-the-fold news in the Washington Post for weeks. Can NOAA afford the bad press and management of the resulting triage?
- Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public.  This includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their GPRA or corporate performance targets.
- IT security risks will increase on all NOAA systems, including networks.
- Dependency: Public Web Services within the Weather & Water Goal (via the Web Consolidation Initiative in NWS)

## Supplemental Information

**Information Relevant to Fiscal/Programming Guidance**

## Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget

| HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ITEM | Unit Cost | FY 2009  | FY 2010  | FY 2011  | FY 2012  | FY 2013  |  | Comments |
| Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card replacement)  [Direct Bill?] | $110  | $0 | $0 | $1,936,000 | $0 | $0 |  | Assumes initial issuance of all cards in FY2008; full replacement in FY2011 on 3-year refresh cycle |
| Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card maintenance fee) [Direct Bill?] | $51  | $897,600 | $897,600 | $897,600 | $897,600 | $897,600 |  | NOAA Employee count (Feds, Commissioned & Contractors) changed to 17,600 based on 10/17/06 MOC figures  |
| Reissued cards     [Direct Bill?]
(10% of 17,600 per year = 1,760) | $110  | $193,600 | $193,600 | $0 | $193,600 | $193,600 |  | 10% employee turnover / lost cards |
| System Certification and Accreditation (ea) Required once every 3 years | $250,000  | $250,000 | $0 | $0 | $250,000 | $0 |  | C&A on 3 year cycle.  FY09: Initial C&A = $300,000.  FY2010-2011: no C&A costs.  FY2012: Re-C&A = $200,000 (i.e., 67% of initial C&A).  FY2013: no C&A costs. |

## Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget

| HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ITEM | Unit Cost | FY 2009  | FY 2010  | FY 2011  | FY 2012  | FY 2013  |  | Comments |
| Additional FTEs – Administrative Services | $144,000  | $432,000 | $432,000 | $432,000 | $432,000 | $432,000 |  | 3 additional FTEs needed for HSPD-12 support - NCR, Seattle and KC. |
| Additional FTEs - WFM | $75,000  | $375,000 | $375,000 | $375,000 | $375,000 | $375,000 |  | 5 additional WFM FTEs will be required |
| TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS |   | $2,148,200 | $1,898,200 | $3,640,600 | $2,148,200 | $1,898,200 |  |   |
| Cost per NOAA/ Contractor Employee |   | $122 | $108 | $207 | 122 | $108 |  |  |

## Compliance with Guidance:Facility Recapitalization Level

**Also measure and use facility utilization, O&M costs, and mission dependency.**

## Compliance with Guidance:Facility Recapitalization Level

- Other budget development methods researched.  Most are more applicable for estimating sustainment and restoration requirements rather than “recapitalization.
- National Research Council (NRC) Recommended Percentage (2%-4% of CRV)
- Facility Condition Index (FCI) *(can lead to a recapitalization estimate)*
- Deferred Maintenance/Repair Backlog
- Validated Repair Needs
- Facility Sustainment Model (FSM)
- Life Cycle Component Management *(can lead to a recapitalization estimate)*
- Other methods primarily used for project prioritization

## Compliance with Guidance:Elimination of Single Points of Failure

_**Action Item:**_  Eliminate Single Points of Failure:  Provide details on the impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure
_**Scope:**_  The elimination of single points of failure will improve NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web services (PWS), and electronic mail services.
_**Impact of Not Implementing: **_
- It will negatively impact NOAA’s ability to accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their goals.
- The IT Services Program will be forced to:
- Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and provide replication of email only for priority users;
- Reduce the hardening of the SSMC backbone;
- Abandon the optimal solution of providing a common infrastructure, redundancy, and diversity;
- Extend the project timelines and scale back the functional requirements for current projects;
- Extend system lifecycle refresh periods, thereby, limiting our ability to implement the 10 Gigabit Ethernet SSMC backbone and MAN networks or new requirements;
- Reduce the implementation of PWS hardware and staff supporting the NOAA Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan requirements;
- Abandon the implementation of mirrored clusters (i.e., consolidated set of servers and storage devices) at 7 locations throughout the U.S.
- Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public.  This includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet.  For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public.
- The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the Line Office local area networks (LANs) and increase the IT security risk to all NOAA systems, including networks.
_**Cost: **_

| Activity | Project Managers or
Subject Matter Experts | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Each Outyear |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Elimination of Single Points of Failure in NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure  | John Kyler, Bob Brunner | $0.8M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Public Web Services  | John Unekis, John Kyler, Chi Kang	 | $1.2M | $1.4M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M |
| Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system) | John Unekis, 
Don Holtzer | $13.0M | $4.8M | $4.8M | $4.8M | $4.8M | $4.8M |

## Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITIES: IT Security, Enterprise Network Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and Regulation
- REQUIREMENT: Transfer of Line Office (LO) CIO Operating Budgets from LO Headquarters Program to IT Services Program
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer of funding will allow the IT Services Program to improve performance through the IT Administration and Regulation, IT Security, Enterprise Network Operations, Enterprise Architecture, and IT Support for Administrative Systems capabilities.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

- If program adjustment is made: Provide centralized administration and management of IT Services across NOAA

- Provide C&A dashboard capability		2009
- NEMIS data storage acquisition, product inventories, analysis, & Suite 2 dashboard instruments	2009
- Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic mail system, including complete redundancy and replication of data for _all_ users			2010
- Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone and NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network	2013

## Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of Funding from OCIO to PS/ITS

| Information Technology Services Program (MS-ITS) | CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING ($K)[including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 

Amount from 
LO CIO |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | FY06 | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 | FY10 | FY11 | FY12 | FY13 |  |
| MS-ITS-ADI IT Administration and Regulation | 1650 | 1650 | 1650 | 4052 | 4052 | 4052 | 4052 | 4052 | 2402 |
| MS-ITS-SEI IT Security  | 1000 | 3050 | 3050 | 7637 | 7637 | 7637 | 7637 | 7637 | 2587 |
| MS-ITS-NET Enterprise Network Operations | 5123 | 5123 | 5123 | 9760 | 9760 | 9760 | 9760 | 9760 | 4637 |
| MS-ITS-ARC Enterprise Architecture | 216 | 216 | 216 | 2263 | 2263 | 2263 | 2263 | 2263 | 1047 |
| MS-ITS-SPT IT Support for Administrative Systems | 15961 | 16132 | 16132 | 20515 | 20515 | 19661 | 19661 | 19661 | 4201 |
| TOTAL FUNDING  | 23950 | 26171 | 26171 | 44227 | 44227 | 43373 | 43373 | 43373 | 14874 |

## Compliance with Guidance:Recommendation on CBS Funding Shortfall

- CBS Current Shortfall:

| CBS Requirements
($ in millions) | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Server Consolidation | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5
 | 2.5 | 0.0 | - Supports NOAA contribution to Census; 
- Cost of software license maintenance; 
- Telecommunication cost to Census |
| New Accounting System |  .9 | .9 | 5.9 | 27.0 | 34.0 | - Supports study for new system
- Conversion of Data; Training
- Implementation of new system; |
| Enhancements to System | 3.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | -HS-PD12 
(modifying CBS, Data warehouse, Travel Manager, etc to accept authorization from this card)
- NOAA Integration and Data Storage
- Full implementation of Commitment Accounting
- Migration to DOC web portal
 |
| Total CBS Shortfall | $6.8 | $5.3 | $10.4 | $30.8 | $35.3
 |  |

## Compliance with Guidance:Recommendation on CBS Funding Shortfall

- Recommendations for Funding CBS Shortfall:

| CBS Requirement | Alternatives for Funding Shortfall |
| --- | --- |
| Server Consolidation | Reduce services to NOAA customers
Reduce funding to the Information Technology Center (ITC) |
| New Accounting System | CBS Base Funding Increase
-Transitional cost associated with moving to new DOC consolidated accounting system exceed the current CBS  base funding
Eliminate current services to NOAA customers
- Stop funding for all maintenance and administrative efforts, help desk support, system testing and training efforts on the current system |
| Enhancements to System | Eliminate support for HS-PD12 within CBS suite of applications
- Suspend modification to accommodate security verification 
Reduce services to NOAA customer
- Decrease access to timely financial data |

## Compliance with Guidance:Update Capabilities ProfileFinancial Services

| ITEM | FY 2009  | FY 2010  | FY 2011  | FY 2012  | FY 2013  | TOTALS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management  | 23,347 | 23,347 | 23,347 | 23,347 | 23,347 | 23,347 |
| MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget | 1,638 | 1,638 | 1,638 | 1,638 | 1,638 | 1,638 |
| MS-FIN NMA Resource Management | 9,831 | 9,831 | 9,796 | 9,796 | 9,796 | 9,796 |
| MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System | 4,380 | 4,380 | 4,380 | 4,380 | 4,380 | 4,380 |
| MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments | 34,425 | 34,425 | 34,425 | `34,425 | 34,425 | 34,425 |
| Total Current Program | 73,621 | 73,621 | 73,586 | 73,586 | 73,586 | 73,586 |

| ITEM | FY 2009  | FY 2010  | FY 2011  | FY 2012  | FY 2013  | TOTALS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management  | 26,411 | 26,411 | 26,411 | 26,411 | 26,411 | 26,411 |
| MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget | 1,743 | 1,743 | 1,743 | 1,743 | 1,743 | 1,743 |
| MS-FIN NMA Resource Management | 9,040 | 9,040 | 9,040 | 9,005 | 9,005 | 9,005 |
| MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System | 2,002 | 2,002 | 2,002 | 2,002 | 2,002 | 2,002 |
| MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments | 34,425 | 34,425 | 34,425 | `34,425 | 34,425 | 34,425 |
| Total Current Program | 73,621 | 73,621 | 73,586 | 73,586 | 73,586 | 73,586 |

- Current Capabilities Profile:

- Updated Current Capabilities Profile:

## Above Core Quads:Tier 3 & 4 (ORF); Tier 2 (PAC)

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Business Process Reengineering

- PROGRAM: Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY:  Office of the NOAA Chief Administrative Officer
- REQUIREMENT: Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Designate continuing direct funding for the Business Process Reengineering effort.  BPR depends on personnel detailed from the Line and Staff Offices, and direct billing of the LO/SO programs for staffing and funding. This adjustment would provide direct funding for contract support.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- “As Is” evaluations completed
- “To Be” evaluations completed
- Recommendations implemented

**Program Support Above Core (T-3): ****Business Process Reengineering**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**  **FY09 – Financial Services – Phase 3; Information Technology – Phase 4
-   FY10 – Financial Services – Phase 4
-   FY11-FY13 – No projects scheduled
- The assumption is that the Safety and Facilities Programs have already completed internal BPR activities.

- Would provide the ability to:
- Complete the reengineering effort on any remaining financial and administrative service areas
- Conduct continuous improvement for financial and administrative processes already reengineered.
- BPR activities risk delay during Government Continuing Resolution due to reliance on contractor funding in 1st quarter

**Notes:**
This alternative would provide resources for fulling staffing and supporting the Transition Management Team that works the NOAA Business Process Reengineering effort. Currently, there is only one assigned staff member, and the designated funding pays only for the labor costs for that position. The remaining resources for BPR come from donations of detailed staffing and contract funding by the Line Offices. Not only does this adversely impact on mission program funding, but it is by its very nature, undependable. In addition, the repeated loss of experienced staff detracts from the efficiency and effectiveness of the BPR effort, since there is an extended learning curve for each new set of detailees.  

In FY 2006, the Business Process Reengineering (BPR) Transition Management Team (TMT) was staffed by one GS-15 from the CAO organization, and anywhere from 10 to 20 analysts and program specialists detailed from the various Line Offices. Additional funding was provided via Direct Bill through a mid-year allocation approved by the CFO Council and the NEP. The eventual goal is to have the TMT staffed by a permanently assigned staff of 1 GS-15 Team Lead, 4 GS-13 Analysts, and 1 GS-7 Program Assistant. It is envisioned that the BPR TMT will be a continuing and on-going activity performing a recurring cycle of Business Process Reengineering evaluations. Cost for the three cycles: 'As Is' evaluation; 'To Be' evaluation; and recommendation implementation, is expected to cost approximately $1.5M per year, including contractor and training requirements. Through the NEP and the NEC, the NOAA Line Offices have committed to supporting this program. Absent direct funding, recurring direct billing will be needed. 

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Commerce Business System (CBS)Server Consolidation

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (T-3): ****Commerce Business System (CBS)****Server Consolidation**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  Accounting Services and Funds Management
- REQUIREMENT: Commerce Business System
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Server Consolidation Project
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved funds control
- Accurate and timely financial information

- FY 2008
- Commerce Business System moves from IT Services to Census Data Center
- FY 2009
- Consolidation of CBS technology architecture
- Supports NOAA contribution to Census facility
- Ensure software license maintenance for software installed at Census

- Ensures software license maintenance for software installed at Census location
- Consolidates CBS technology architecture
- Without enhancements to the current CBS system, NOAA managers will not have access to timely financial data necessary to make informed programmatic decisions
- Supports the NOAA contribution to Census facility and includes telecommunications cost for developers and administrators

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Commerce Business System Funds Control Enhancements

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (T-3): Commerce Business System ****Funds Control Enhancements**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  Accounting Services and Funds Management
- REQUIREMENT: Commerce Business System
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Enhancement to Commerce Business System
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved funds control
- Accurate and timely financial information

- FY 2009 – FY 2013
- Implementation of commitment accounting
- Staffing will be increased to meet accelerating reporting requirements
- Migration to DOC Business web portal
- Implementation of Reimbursable module to monitor and control Reimbursable funding
- Development of an automated accounting module

- To improve management of funding, NOAA needs to implement commitment accounting
- Implementation of E-Travel will enable NOAA to meet the PMA requirement, which will simplify Federal travel management
- Without enhancements to the current CBS system, NOAA managers will not have access to timely financial data necessary to make informed programmatic decisions

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Technology Refresh & Desktop Management

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITIES: IT Security, Enterprise Network Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and Regulation
- REQUIREMENT: Technology Refresh & Desktop Management
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Technology Refresh & Desktop Management for NOAA Computer Incident Response Team, Information Technology Center, Network Operations Center, Web Operations Center, Messaging Operations Center, OS LAN / Systems Support, and OCIO
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents, Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

- If program adjustment is made: Meet recommended system lifecycle refresh requirements
- If program adjustment is _not_ made:
- Extend system lifecycle refresh period from 3 years to 5 years
- Extend timelines and scale back functional requirements for current projects

- Technology Refresh 		Oct 2008 – Sep 2013
- Desktop Management 		Oct 2008 – Sep 2013

## Program Support Above Core (T-3):  Human Resources Information  System

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  HR Programs
- REQUIREMENT:  BPR recommendation; e-Gov Initiative
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- HRIS is an enhancement to the current NFC payroll system that supports automated processing of HR actions (e.g., SF-52-s)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- % of actions resulting in processing errors
- Hiring cycle time

- FY 07-08:  Work with DOC and NFC on systems requirements and develop implementation plan
- FY 09:  Implement HRIS
- FY 10-13:  Maintain system license

- If Adjustment made, HR actions can be initiated in LO/COs, automatically routed for approval and action, and automatically fed into the NFC system.  This will reduce hiring cycle time, lost paperwork, processing errors due to rekeying and use of drop-down menus.
- If Adjustment not made, BPR recommendations will not be maximized and current situation will continue.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Mandated Administrative Services

- PROGRAM: Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY:  CAO, AICIM, LOG
- REQUIREMENT: Mandated Administrative Services
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: A number of unfunded mandates have been imposed on MS-ADS that have strained existing resources to the point where other critical services are being degraded.  Dedicated funding and FTE for these activities are required
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Deemed Export requirements are met.
- Personal Property program and audit requirements are met.
- FOIA requirements are met.
- Audit Liaison requirements are met.

**Program Support Above Core (T-3): ****Mandated Administrative Services**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Failure to provide additional FTE and funding will result in continued degradation of existing services, many of which are critical.
- Dedicated FTE and resources will ensure NOAA’s ability to meet legal and regulatory mandates, both timely and effectively, and achieve clean audits.

- Contracts require funding in first quarter each year for FOIA and Audits:  1Q, FY 09-13
- Hire an additional 5 FTE for Personal Property Branch (2- HI, 1-SEA, 1-Norfolk, 1-SSMC ):   2Q, FY09
- Establish recurring training and conferences for Deemed Export implementation;  2Q-3Q, FY09-13

**Notes:**
This alternative would provide resources for fulling staffing and supporting the Transition Management Team that works the NOAA Business Process Reengineering effort. Currently, there is only one assigned staff member, and the designated funding pays only for the labor costs for that position. The remaining resources for BPR come from donations of detailed staffing and contract funding by the Line Offices. Not only does this adversely impact on mission program funding, but it is by its very nature, undependable. In addition, the repeated loss of experienced staff detracts from the efficiency and effectiveness of the BPR effort, since there is an extended learning curve for each new set of detailees.  

In FY 2006, the Business Process Reengineering (BPR) Transition Management Team (TMT) was staffed by one GS-15 from the CAO organization, and anywhere from 10 to 20 analysts and program specialists detailed from the various Line Offices. Additional funding was provided via Direct Bill through a mid-year allocation approved by the CFO Council and the NEP. The eventual goal is to have the TMT staffed by a permanently assigned staff of 1 GS-15 Team Lead, 4 GS-13 Analysts, and 1 GS-7 Program Assistant. It is envisioned that the BPR TMT will be a continuing and on-going activity performing a recurring cycle of Business Process Reengineering evaluations. Cost for the three cycles: 'As Is' evaluation; 'To Be' evaluation; and recommendation implementation, is expected to cost approximately $1.5M per year, including contractor and training requirements. Through the NEP and the NEC, the NOAA Line Offices have committed to supporting this program. Absent direct funding, recurring direct billing will be needed. 

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Sustainment
- REQUIREMENT: Funding of Sustainment costs at WRC-Seattle and NOAA’s Pacific Region Center (PRC), Honolulu, HI
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- To provide these NOAA-owned facilities with proper level of sustainment funding in accordance with Facilities Business Model.  Above core funding is requested to establish.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved inventory FCI

- Proper sustainment investment increases building’s useful life, defers or prevents restoration expenses.
- Failure to fund results in deferment of needed actions, degrading facilities condition.

**Program Support Above Core ****(T-3):**** ****Corporate Sustainment**

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): Western Regional Center (WRC) Operations

- PROGRAM: Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY:  Logistics
- REQUIREMENT: Funding of Building Management Operations at NOAA’s Western Regional Center (WRC), Seattle, WA
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- The WRC is a NOAA-owned facility.  In recent years there has been significant increases in the operational costs without a concurrent increase in funding.  Above core funding is requested to establish dedicated resources for WRC Operations.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Adequate funding for necessary building and facility operations.

**Program Support Above Core (T-3): ****Western Regional Center (WRC) Operations**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Most service contracts require initial funding in first quarter of each year
- Most service contracts for Building Management are “Must Pay”

- Required but unfunded payments produce a shortfall for other critical Program Support requirements.
- Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of capability.
- Failure to fund results in denial or deferment of needed actions, degrading facilities and services.

## Program Support Above Core (T-3): OneNOAA Web Presence

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITY: Enterprise Architecture
- REQUIREMENT: OneNOAA Web Presence
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement enterprise-level web management
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Capability Maturity Model Score

- _FY2009-13_
- Implement Plan to Consolidate and Organize NOAA’s Web Assets
- Evaluate NOAA-wide search capability
- Conduct ongoing information asset inventory and evaluate against baseline
- Reorganize NOAA Web offerings in thematic approach, independent of organizational structure
- Coordinate with other Federal agencies to ensure customer-centric coordination and presentation of information
- Begin migration to MyNOAA concept
- Create unified portal providing seamless access to NOAA internal and external information
- Create role-based security model to ensure integrity to sensitive information assets
- Provide localized and personalized information to Web customers
- Begin implementation of Web Server Consolidation

- If program adjustment is made:
- Improve access to NOAA products and services
- Meet stakeholder needs
- Achieve NOAA-level web management for internet and intranet
- Integrate web communications to NOAA business process
- Create functional content and technical web architectures with single-point access to NOAA’s vast web offerings
- Secure funding for long-term support and maintenance of the NOAA Web presence
- If program adjustment is _not_ made:
- Recommendations from post-Isabel and post-Katrina service assessments will remain unaddressed
- Continuation of disjointed operation of NOAA web holdings
- Potentially conflicting information posted to web

## Program Support Above Core (T-4):NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**GOAL: Program Support**
**PROGRAM: Information Technology Services**
**CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations**
**REQUIREMENT: NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network**
**DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement common NOAA communications Infrastructure and consolidate 9 legacy networks **
**PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services Availability**

- Complete the transition of all NOAA Line Office Wide Area Networks (WANs) to the NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network				2009
- Provide multiple transparent external connections throughout the nation, by maintaining up to 4 ISP large scale connections 			2011
- Complete the hardening of NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network			2013

**If program adjustment is made:**
**$30M cost avoidance over first 7 years – network transport only; cost avoidance will be applied to enhancements**
**Meets NOAA’s requirements and supports NOAA’s mission performance**
**Centrally-managed NOAA network (24x7 operations center)**
**Reuse and share common services (i.e., email, videoconferencing, administrative & desktop applications, corporate & programmatic operations, intranet)**
**Common Security Infrastructure supports single C&A and provides secure environments (i.e., communities of interest) for user communities**
**If program adjustment is **_**not**_** made: **
**Legacy networks approaching end-of-life; more expensive to sustain**
**Uncoordinated redundancy at shared locations increases costs**
**Loss of connectivity at a hub location disables connectivity at dependent remote locations**
**Complete COOP failover is difficult or impossible when backup sites rely on dedicated or separate networks**
**Dependencies: **
**Implementation requires the redistribution of financial resources from other Goals/Programs**
**Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to be provided by NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT)**

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Commerce Business System – New DOC Accounting System

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): Commerce Business System – ****New DOC Accounting System**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM: Financial Services
- CAPABILITY:  Accounting Services and Funds Management
- REQUIREMENT: Commerce Business System
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- New Accounting System
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved funds control
- Accurate and timely financial information
- Federal E-Travel Management tool

- FY 2009 – FY 2013
- Study/compete for new DOC accounting system
- Implementation
- Transition to new DOC accounting system

- Supports implementation to new accounting system
- Enables conversion of data, support for new system and data warehouse training

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Elimination of Single Points of Failure (Electronic Mail Services)  

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Elimination of Single Points of Failure ****(Electronic Mail Services)  **

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations
- REQUIREMENT: Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system)
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement common email infrastructure that includes redundancy with built-in failover
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services Availability

- Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic mail system, including complete redundancy and replication of data for _all_ users 			2010

- If program adjustment is _not_ made:
- NOAA messaging operations (a primary communication mechanism throughout the enterprise) will become unavailable during a power failure or when construction/utility equipment (e.g., backhoe) disrupts the email service connection.
- Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and provide replication of email only for priority users.
- DOC will continue to lack a common electronic mail system across all its agencies/bureaus.
- Dependencies:
- Migration planning has been underway since January 2006, when DOC alerted NOAA to begin projecting costs for the transition to a Commerce-wide common email system.
- DOC has not provided clear FY09 Budget guidance with respect to the migration to a Commerce-wide common email system.
- NOAA currently operates and maintains a distributed email system with multiple single points of failure, and utilizes the Thunderbird email application for more than 19,000 users, but will need funding to support Commerce’s move to a common platform without single points of failure.
- On 9/21/06, as part of its Electronic Mail Study, DOC initiated a mandatory data call on e-mail costs for all bureaus; purpose: to obtain costs of email at each Operating Unit; use of data: analysis to support the business case. NOAA submitted data on 9/26/06.

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): ADR Program

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital
- REQUIREMENT: Support for NO FEAR Act
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Fund NOAA’s National Alternative Dispute Resolution Program
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- TBD (significant measures difficult to develop due to confidential nature of ADR program and inability to set targets for number of mediations requested)

- WFMO manages the NOAA National ADR Program including intake and mediation management, mediator training, outreach, and interventions.
- Conducting 35 successful mediations each year saves NOAA $1.750K net each year.
- Funding buys mediator travel, training for mediator cadre, outreach materials, travel and materials to conduct interventions.

- NOAA saves an average of $50K net on every successful mediation or $7 for every dollar invested in the ADR Program.
- If Adjustment not made, ADR will continue to be dependent on managers’ willingness/ability to provide travel or ask FMCs for funding (which they are often reluctant to do); NOAA will lose money to continued conflicts and adversarial proceedings; minimal outreach can occur with reduction in Program use; new mediators will not be trained or current cadre kept up to date.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Corporate Recruitment Program

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital
- REQUIREMENT:  SES Summit; PMA
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Provide on-going support for a new FTE  recently funded through FY 2008 and funding for modest NOAA outreach effort and recruitment materials
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- New hire quality
- Others TBD by new position

- FY 07 Q1-Q2:  Hire Recruitment Program Manager in WFMO
- FY 07 Q3-Q4:  Analyze NOAA recruitment issues; develop strategy to address issues; develop performance measures
- FY 08:  Fully implement recruitment strategy including training recruiter cadre and reviewing/revising NOAA recruitment materials
- FY 09-13:  Continue corporate recruitment program
- Funding:  $145K for 1 FTE, $35K for recruitment travel, $30K for recruitment** **materials

- If Adjustment made, NOAA can implement and sustain the Corporate Recruitment Strategy to be  developed in FY 07.
- If Adjustment not made, WFMO may not have funding for new position established in FY 07 and funded through FY 08.
- No dependencies on other programs.

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Real Property Asset Management

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Infrastructure
- REQUIREMENT:  Real Property Asset Management
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Replace current asset management system, which is fragmented and inefficient, with state of the art product and capability
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved Compliance with EO13327
- Improved facility data for decision-making

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Real Property Asset Management**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

- FY 2008 – Implement  real property asset management system, and identify necessary linkages and data gaps
- FY 2009 - Implement architecture and database structures (linking existing databases, and creating new data fields required by E.O. 13327)
- FY 2010-12 - Ongoing maintenance and refinement

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Improve data regarding facilities:  conditions, hazardous materials, staffing, occupancy costs, age, replacement costs.
- Improved capacity for facility decision-making based on accurate facility data.  Improved capacity for COOP and capital investment decisions.

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Employee Assistance Program

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY: HR Programs
- REQUIREMENT:  Public Law 99-570; 5 CFR part 792; Executive Order 12564 require agencies to establish appropriate prevention, treatment, rehabilitative, and counseling services and programs for employees.
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Fund NOAA Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Client satisfaction

- EAP services provided by contractor, COR in WFMO
- Re-compete contract in FY 11

- If Adjustment made, NOAA employees and their families will continue to receive professional counseling, guidance, and support from the EAP.
- If Adjustment not made, the EAP contract cannot be funded unless it is funded through direct bill.
-  NOAA risks not meeting the mandate for agencies to  have EAPs and also lessens the quality of work life and benefits available to employees.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): James D. Martin Worklife Center

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY: Managing Diversity
- REQUIREMENT:  NOAA requirement
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Fund James D. Martin Worklife Center
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Client satisfaction
- Usage
- Human Capital Survey items

- Worklife Center staffed by contract.

- If Adjustment made, NOAA employees will continue to have access to resources to help balance work and personal lives (e.g., elder care or child care referrals, lactation facilities in Silver Spring, monthly seminars taped and placed on web site).  Worklife programs are important for recruitment, retention, and morale.
- If Adjustment not made, the Worklife Center may have to close and/or stop offering seminars and other professional services.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full FTE Funding

**Required by Program Guidance**

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of ADS Federal FTE

- PROGRAM:   Administrative Services
- CAPABILITY: OCAO, AICIM, AMES, CRO, LOG
- REQUIREMENT:  All Administrative Services Program requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- MS-ADS has 101 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes Other Object Class funding, e.g., desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- All MS-ADS performance measures

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Full Funding of ADS Federal FTE**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.
- If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met.
- Reduced dependencies on other programs

- 101 Fully-Funded Federal FTE	Oct 2008 – Sep 2013
- 	   --  Program adjustment will provide additional funding for 10 FTE

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of AQP Federal FTE

- PROGRAM:   Acquisition and Grants
- CAPABILITY:  Acquisition processing services; financial assistance processing services
- REQUIREMENT:  All Acquisition and Grants Program requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- MS-AQP has 168 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes 22 vacant positions)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- All MS-AQP performance measures including award cycle time

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Full Funding of AQP Federal FTE**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Funding buys ability to fill 22 vacant positions and training, awards, supplies, travel, equipment, and other support for 168 employees.
- FY 2009, Q1-Q2: Fill vacant positions

- If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.
- If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met.
- No dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of FAC Federal FTE

- PROGRAM:   Facilities Program
- CAPABILITY: RPFLO, RPMD, PPMD, SECO
- REQUIREMENT:  All Facilities Program requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- MS-FAC has 92 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes Other Object Class funding, e.g., desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- All MS-FAC performance measures

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Full Funding of FAC Federal FTE**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.
- If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met.
- Reduced dependencies on other programs

- 92 Fully-Funded Federal FTE	Oct 2008 – Sep 2013
- 	 --  Program adjustment will provide additional funding for 4 FTE

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of FIN Federal FTE

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Financial Services
- CAPABILITY: Accounting Services and Funds Management, Develop and Defend Budget, NMA Resource Management, PPBES MIS, NOAA Centralized Payments
- REQUIREMENT:  All Financial Services Program requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Provides adequate funding to support salaries and benefits for 282 federal FTE in the Financial Services Program
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- All MS-FIN performance measures

- If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.
- If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met.

- 282 Fully-Funded Federal FTE	Oct 2008 – Sep 2013
- 255 FTE’s funded at Current Program level
- 27 FTE’s funded with Program Adjustment

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of ITS Federal FTE

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL: Program Support
- PROGRAM: Information Technology Services
- CAPABILITIES: IT Security, Enterprise Network Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and Regulation
- REQUIREMENT: Full Funding of Federal FTE
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Provide adequate funding to support salaries and benefits for 107 federal FTE in the IT Services Program
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents, Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

- If program adjustment is made: IT Services Program will be better positioned to accomplish its mission, and provided adequate support to the NOAA Mission Goals
- If program adjustment is _not_ made:
- More overtime
- Slots will remain vacant as federal employees retire or move on to other career opportunities
- Extend timelines and scale back functional requirements for current projects

- 107 Fully-Funded Federal FTE	Oct 2008 – Sep 2013
- 	    -- Program Adjustment of funding for 19 FTE

## Program Support Above Core (T-4): Fully Fund WMP Positions

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (T-4): ****Fully Fund WMP Positions**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  HR Programs, Strategic Management of Human Capital, Managing Diversity
- REQUIREMENT:  All Workforce Management Program requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- MS-WMP has 170 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- All MS-WMP performance measures including hiring cycle time

- Funding buys ability to fill 9 vacant positions and training, awards, supplies, travel, equipment, and other support for 170 employees.
- FY 2009, Q1-Q2: Fill vacant positions

- If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.
- If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met; BPR implementation may not be able to be sustained.
- No dependencies on other programs.

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2):Tier 2—PAC

- Individual Facility Projects
- Additional Requirements (within 100%)
- Unprioritized
- No business case analysis conducted to validate requirement, costs, or preferred solution

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Summary of Remaining Requirements

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Summary of Remaining Requirements**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  All
- REQUIREMENT:  Summary of Remaining Above Core Requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Consolidation of responses to FY09 Data Call
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

- See individual project write-ups

- See individual project write-ups

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Summary of Remaining Requirements

| Project Title | LO | FY2009 | FY2010 | FY2011 | FY2012 | FY2013 | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Replace NOAA Aircraft Hangar | NMAO | 5000 | 5000 | 55000 | 0 | 0 | 65000 |
| NDBC Office and Industrial Building Facilities | NWS | 20650 | 625 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21275 |
| Hangar for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)/Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) | OAR | 2300 | 2300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4600 |
| WFO Construction (in lieu of lease: Taunton, Fort Worth, Tulsa, Little Rock, Topeka)  | NWS | 1139 | 829 | 8400 | 22385 | 1730 | 34483 |
| WFO Construction (w/o Leases) | NWS | 0 | 4600 | 10200 | 10200 | 7700 | 32700 |
| NWS Facilities Maintenance Funding Shortfall | NWS | 10210 | 10300 | 10310 | 10280 | 10610 | 51710 |
| Harden NWS Facilities | NWS | 7100 | 12168 | 5980 |  |  | 25248 |
| NMSP Shortfall | NOS | 925 | 5825 | 6375 | 10400 | 11945 | 35470 |
| Construct New Main Building, Barrow Baseline Observatory, Barrow AK | OAR | 325 | 2435 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2760 |
| Construction of Office and Support Facilities, Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory, Hilo Hawaii | OAR | 0 | 706 | 3675 | 0 | 0 | 4381 |
| Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) | OAR | 0 | 2360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2360 |
| REPLACEMENT FOR "ANNEX" BUILDING FOR ARL'S ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE AND DIFFUSION DIVISION | OAR | 381 | 2712 | 606 | 0 | 0 | 3699 |
| F-13 Woods Hole Lab Modernization, including Aquarium | NMFS | 8395 | 2180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10575 |

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Summary of Remaining Requirements (Continued)

| Project Title | LO | FY2009 | FY2010 | FY2011 | FY2012 | FY2013 | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) Main Facility | OAR | 0 | 11200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11200 |
| F-5 Sandy Hook Dock Construction | NMFS | 2880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2880 |
| F-10 Mulkilteo Facility Replacement Project | NMFS | 925 | 8060 | 12850 | 0 | 0 | 21835 |
| F-11 Narragansett Laboratory Expansion and Restoration | NMFS | 7380 | 2250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9630 |
| F-14 Milford Laboratory Expansion and Restoration | NMFS | 4735 | 7145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11880 |
| Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building | NMFS | 4420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4420 |
| F-16 Santa Cruz Office and Laboratory Expansion | NMFS | 2200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2200 |
| F-17 Pribilof Islands Facilities Modernization and Expansion | NMFS | 1475 | 9775 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11250 |
| Lake Michigan Field Station Laboratory Expansion and Upgrade | OAR | 0 | 3500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3500 |
| Wallops CDAS Capital Acquisition Program | NESDIS | 1733 | 8552 | 11121 | 18375 | 11489 | 51270 |
| Fairbanks CDAS Capital Acquisition Program | NESDIS | 8911 | 10534 | 7161 | 6877 | 4222 | 37705 |
| Emergency Power and Cooling to Support NOAA Boulder's Center of Excellence for Operations & Research | NESDIS | 1200 | 1100 | 1100 | 700 | 2500 | 6600 |
|  |  | 92284 | 113156 | 132778 | 79217 | 50196 | 467631 |

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Summary of Remaining Requirements (Continued)**

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NMAO Aircraft Hangar

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  NMAO Aircraft Hangar
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Construction of Aircraft Hangar at Tampa to replace hangar being retrieved by DoD due to BRAC
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NMAO Aircraft Hangar**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY10
- Construction				FY11

- Replaces outdated and unsafe dispersed existing buildings
- Allows for potential addition of third P3 aircraft
- Highly inefficient operations and excessive maintenance delays will impact NOAA programs if the aircraft are not located in the same area.
- Risks:  Alternatives limited

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): UAV Hangars

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  Hangars for UAVs
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Construction/acquisition of Hangars for UAVs; possible renovation of existing hangars to accommodate acquisition of  unmanned aerial vehicles
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- UAVs have enormous potential to be NOAA’s suborbital observing system serving mission needs for ecosystems, climate, weather and water, and commerce and transportation

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****UAV Hangars**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Acquisition/Renovation		           FY09 – FY10

- Protection of aircraft from high winds and adverse weather
- Addition of new capability
- High readiness level for time sensitive operations
- Integration of mission and support functions
- Risk:  Finding available hangars

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NDBC Office Expansion

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  NDBC Office and Industrial Building
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  modernize and expand the NWS National Data Buoy Center’s (NDBC),  industrial maintenance and office facilities at Stennis Space Center, Mississippi
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NDBC Office Expansion**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Warehouse Planning and Design		FY09
- Warehouse Construction			FY10
- Sandblast Design			FY11
- Sandblast Construction			FY11
- Office Design and Construction 	            FY11-FY13

- Increased Buoy Maintenance Capacity
- IOOS Support

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NWS Lease Conversions

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  NWS WFO/RFC Lease Conversions
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Construction
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NWS Lease Conversions**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning			FY09 – FY10
- Design			FY10 – FY11
- Construction		        	FY11 – FY12

- Lower Life Cycle Costs
- Less uncertainty; more flexibility
- Risks/barriers to implementation:  Contractor and Real Property Availability

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NWS Construction Shortfall

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  Fund remaining NWS Construction requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Construction
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NWS Construction Shortfall**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Barrow WSO/Housing			FY09
- Nome Housing			FY10
- Cold Bay WSO/Housing			FY11
- Bethel WSO				FY11
- Valdez Housing			FY12
- Yakutat Housing		**	****FY12**

- Provides safe and compliant work and living environment for employees
** **

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NWS Facilities Maintenance Shortfall

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Operations & Maintenance; Sustainment
- REQUIREMENT:  NWS Facilities Maintenance
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  To bring the program up to its 100% Requirement and reduce maintenance backlog; address cyclic replacements deferred due to lack of funding; ensure ongoing service contracts are in place
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NWS Facilities Maintenance Shortfall**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Reduce existing backlog                                  FY09-FY11
- Perform Cyclic Replacements                          FY09-FY12
- Add missing service contracts                         FY09-FY10

- Improved Inventory FCI
- Extended Life Cycle/Useful Life
- Impact if program adjustment is not made:  Portfolio degradation

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Harden NWS Facilities

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  Harden NWS Facilities
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Replace Brownsville and Lake Charles WFOs
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved Capability to withstand Hurricane conditions

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Harden NWS Facilities**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY10
- Construction		                               FY10 – FY11

- Provides capability to sustain operations during hurricane events

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NMSP Shortfall

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction
- REQUIREMENT:  NMSP Shortfall
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Facilities recapitalization for several NMS sites, upgrades of Visitors Centers and admin buildings, improvement of exhibtry.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****NMSP Shortfall**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Crissy Field Recapitalize	                              FY09 – FY12
- Key West Sea Wall			FY09
- Upper Keys	 Office			FY10
- Santa Cruz Visitors Center	         FY10 – FY12
- Upper Keys Visitors Center	         FY11 – FY12
- OCNMS Admin Bldg		         FY12 – FY13
- FBNMS Bldg		         FY12 – FY13

- Leverages partnership with National Park Service to minimize costs at potentially unaffordable locations
- Improved public education and outreach capability

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Barrow Baseline Observatory

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  Barrow Baseline Observatory
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  construct a new main observatory building at the NOAA Barrow, Alaska, Atmospheric Baseline Observatory
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI
- Increased monitoring capability

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Barrow Baseline Observatory**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

- Sustains critical atmospheric and monitoring research capability
- Allows for expansion of cooperative programs
- Risk:  Alternatives limited

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  To construct a 5,000 ft2 office and support facility for the Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO), Hilo, Hawaii for 10 staff and up to three visiting scientists and students; current accommodations substandard.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

- GSA Renovation and Lease Increases very Expensive and require Two Moves
- Free Land Available for New Building
- Key Stations for Climate Change Monitoring

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Boulder Atmospheric Observatory Land Acquisition

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Boulder Atmospheric Observatory
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  purchase of the full 160 acre quarter-section of land
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Long term Cost savings of land ownership

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Boulder Atmospheric Observatory Land Acquisition**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Acquisition				 FY09

- Potential life cycle cost savings of $1.5M over leasing alternative
- Sustainment of unique tower measurement capabilities

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ARL ATDD Oak Ridge

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  ARL – ATDD Oak Ridge
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  To construct replacement building for two 35 year old temporary triple wide trailers
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****ARL ATDD Oak Ridge**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

-   Improved working conditions
-   Currently Housed in Temporary, 35 Year Old Triple Wide Trailers
-   Conditions poor:  Humidity, Mildew and Leaks

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Woods Hole Lab Modernization

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Woods Hole Lab Modernization, including aquarium
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  The proposed structure is a combination office and laboratory building which would house staff of the Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) Woods Hole Laboratory.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Woods Hole Lab Modernization**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction		                               FY09 - FY10

-  NOAA-dedicated, high profile and popular education center in one of the world’s most recognized and influential centers of marine science (Woods Hole),
-  Preservation and promotion of one of the agency’s heritage assets
-  Regional platform for NOAA outreach and education programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): GLERL Recapitalization

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) Recapitalization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Funding to relocate to a 44,300 net square feet facility
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****GLERL Recapitalization**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- TBD				FY09

- Improved research capability
- Cost savings

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Sandy Hook Dock Construction

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Sandy Hook Dock Construction
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  This project would modernize Sandy Hook facilities.  The facility will consist of a pier with wave attenuation, a floating ferry dock, a marine research support building, improved parking and a waiting area with restrooms.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Sandy Hook Dock Construction**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY09

- Improved research capability
- Elimination of long species transports

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Mulkiteo Lab Recapitalization

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Mulkiteo Recapitalization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Project includes replacing the current 10,000 sf building with a 16,000 sf seawater laboratory and seawater system, a separate 10,000 sf building to house marine research wet labs, and a 5,000 sf structures for equipment and boat storage
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Mulkiteo Lab Recapitalization**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction		                               FY10 – FY11

- Impact Continued availability of this quality seawater critical for research supporting NOAA’s Ecosystem goals.
- Military Construction Authorization Act contained specific language that conveys NOAA Mukilteo Research Station property

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Narragansett  Lab Recapitalization 

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Narragansett Recapitalization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: A new wing is envisioned to replace 5 temporary trailer-type office-laboratory (TOL) modules located on the federal property adjacent to the original Laboratory building.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Narragansett  Lab Recapitalization**** **

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction		          	          FY09 - FY10

- Supports enhanced scientific understanding of the role of the oceans, coasts, and atmosphere in the global ecosystem
- Keeps pace with the expanded responsibilities for providing scientific assessments

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Milford Lab Recapitalization

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Milford Recapitalization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: construction of a new Finfish Culture Facility on the property of the NEFSC Milford Laboratory at Milford, CT
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Milford Lab Recapitalization**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

- Significantly enhances the culture of important commercial and recreational marine shellfish and finfish species over the next decade;
- Potential return on investment for aquaculture research is considerable

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  provides space  needed  for large shipboard scientific gear and scientific trawl nets used in research
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Provides increased capability to conduct surveys and storage for scientific gear and equipment

- Planning/				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY09

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Santa Cruz Office Expansion

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Santa Cruz Office Expansion
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: This project would add square footage and facilities to the Santa Cruz lab that were approved in the original building design but cut back due to cost constraints in the initial construction process
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Santa Cruz Office Expansion**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY09

- Enables increased collaboration with partner agencies
- Increased rigor of laboratory analysis

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Pribilofs Modernization and Expansion

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Pribilofs Island Modernization
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Replaces vehicle storage building and existing staff quarters; upgrades existing laboratory, constructs new research center
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Pribilofs Modernization and Expansion**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

-  Supports expansion of mission
-  Brings additional researchers from NOAA and other research groups to this area

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Lake Michigan Field Station Upgrade

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT:  Lake Michigan Field Station Laboratory Expansion and Upgrade
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Expand the existing laboratory building (Bldg. 3) by doubling the number of state-of-the-art laboratories
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Lake Michigan Field Station Upgrade**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY10

- Enhance NOAA's ecosystem research leadership role in the Great Lakes basin while also building new and continuing partnerships with Universities.

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Wallops CDAS

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:
- REQUIREMENT: Wallops CDAS Capital Acquisition Program
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Complete Renovation of facilities at Wallops in accordance with NESDIS Master Plan
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Wallops CDAS**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Utility Bldg Addition			FY10
- Satellite Operations		            FY11-FY12
- Antenna Repair Facility			FY12
- Shipping/Receiving Facility		FY13

- Renovate/Replace Deteriorating Satellite Support Facilities
- Reduce Risk of Satellite Disruption/Unavailability

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Fairbanks CDAS

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT: Fairbanks CDAS Capital Acquisition Program
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Complete Renovation of facilities at Fairbanks in accordance with NESDIS Master Plan
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Fairbanks CDAS**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Transmitter Shelter			FY10
- Vehicle Maintenance and Storage		FY10
- Geophysical Observatory			FY10
- Support Facility		             FY11-fY12

- Renovate/Replace Deteriorating Satellite Support Facilities
- Reduce Risk of Satellite Disruption/Unavailability

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Boulder (DSRC) Upgrade

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT: Boulder (DSRC) Emergency Power and Cooling Requirements
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Additional emergency generator power and chilled water capacity are required to enable all NOAA scientists and operational & support staff of the NOAA Boulder, David Skaggs Research Center (DSRC) to continue with and expand their mission critical functions.
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): ****Boulder (DSRC) Upgrade**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Planning				FY09
- Design				FY09
- Construction				FY09

- Adequate equipment for IT support for basic mission accomplishment

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Additional Backup Information

- Technical Adjustments
- Compliance with Guidance Backup Information
- Integrated Priority Listings

## Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of Facilities LaborFunding from Admin Services

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Logically aligns Facilities labor with its non-labor costs, providing clearer accounting of costs
- Increases visibility into total capability costs
- Risks – some execution  flexibility lost in sub-dividing larger labor

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Infrastructure
- REQUIREMENT:  Alignment of Facilities Labor and Non-Labor Costs
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:
- Transfer of funds from Admin Services to Facilities Program for the Real Property, Facilities and Logistics Office; Real Property Management; Project Planning and Management; and Safety and Environmental Compliance
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- None

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

**Proposed Technical Adjustment: ****Merge Workforce Management Capabilities**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:   Workforce Management
- CAPABILITY:  Managing Diversity, Strategic Management of Human Capital
- REQUIREMENT:  The President’s Management Agenda Human Capital Initiative includes diversity management as a critical success factor for developing a “Results Oriented Performance Culture”
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Merge the Managing Diversity capability into the Strategic Management of Human Capital capability
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- New measures being developed to align with OPM’s new HCAAF metrics and performance indicators.

- Revise Workforce Management Program Charter- Q2, 2007  (Workforce Management Program Manager)
- Adjust PIRS

- If Adjustment is made, Managing Diversity activities will be added to Strategic Management of Human Capital resulting in enhanced integration of Managing Diversity with NOAA’s Strategic Human Capital Management Plan.
- If Adjustment is not made, the Managing Diversity capability will remain without a strong separate requirement and with minimal resources
- No barriers to implementation or dependencies on other programs

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Compliance with Guidance:CIO Council and Satellite Sub-Goal: Enterprise IT Security

- 10/6/06: IT Services Program Manager alerted CIO Council Chair that FY09 Fiscal & Programming Guidance (Serial 3) instructs CIO Council to work with Satellite Sub-Goal Team Lead to identify requirement for providing Enterprise IT Security within NESDIS
- NESDIS CIO and/or NESDIS member of IT Security Committee may be the most appropriate coordinators
- 10/13/06: Requested & received clarification from Kevin Amos (PA&E)
- Satellite Sub-Goal:
- Address IT security issues (i.e., entire NESDIS requirement) in FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan
- CIO Council:
- Work with Satellite Sub-Goal to ensure they understand and include all NESDIS IT Security requirements in their Program Plan
- Advise Gary Davis (Satellite Sub-Goal Team Lead) and his Program Plan development team throughout the process, to ensure they understand the full requirement and the best way to meet the IT security standards
- Review the FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan and ensure that it includes the funds necessary to meet all IT security requirements for FY09-13
- Advise PA&E that the Program Plan meets IT security requirements, or that it does not and identify where it fails to meet the requirements; if the Program Plan does not meet all IT security requirements, then identify the risk to NOAA and potential consequences of the remaining IT security shortfalls
- 10/30/06: Deadline for FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan

## Proposed Technical Adjustment: Pacific Regional Center Project SupportMission Goal Funds Transfer

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support
- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction – Recapitalization/Consolidation
- REQUIREMENT:  Pacific Regional Center (PRC)
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Transfer funds to Program Support from Mission Goals for PRC project based on share of FTEs occupying facility per Serial 3 guidance
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

- Regional Consolidation of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

**Note:  Climate amount will be Above Core in the Climate Program Plan**

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Proposed Technical Adjustment: PRC Project SupportWeather/Water Funds Transfer

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction
- REQUIREMENT:  PRC
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Transfer funds to Program Support for Weather and Water Goal’s portion of the PRC project per Serial 3 guidance
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Proposed Technical Adjustment: ****PRC Project Support****Weather/Water Funds Transfer**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Proposed Technical Adjustment: PRC Project SupportClimate Funds Transfer

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction
- REQUIREMENT:  PRC
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Transfer funds to Program Support for Climate Goal’s  portion of the PRC project
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Proposed Technical Adjustment: ****PRC Project Support****Climate Funds Transfer**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Proposed Technical Adjustment: PRC Project SupportSatellites Funds Transfer

- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction
- REQUIREMENT:  PRC
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Transfer funds to Program Support for Satellite Subgoal portion of the PRC project
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

**Proposed Technical Adjustment: ****PRC Project Support****Satellites Funds Transfer**

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Proposed Technical Adjustment: La Jolla Project SupportEcosystems Funds Transfer

**	****PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT ****	****              FUNDING**

**BENEFITS AND RISKS**

**ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES**

- GOAL:  Program Support and Ecosystems
- PROGRAM:  Facilities
- CAPABILITY:  Construction - Recapitalization
- REQUIREMENT:  LaJolla
- DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:  Transfer funds to Program Support from Ecosystems Goal for LaJolla
- PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
- Improved FCI

- Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

**Notes:**
Concise, formatted display of information   
Exact information may vary by issue, goal, program, appropriation, etc. etc.  PAC adjustment may show different info from operational adjustment
Basic format summarizes important information that support recommendations and/or decisions 
There will be one quad chart for each recommended program adjustment
Include all relevant information

## Compliance with Guidance

- IPL Compliance: 	What we heard from other Offices.

## Compliance with Guidance

- IPL Compliance: 	What we heard from other Offices.

## Compliance with Guidance

- IPL Compliance: 	What we heard from other Offices (Cont’d)

## Compliance with Guidance

- IPL Compliance: 	What we heard from other Offices (Cont’d)