# Presentation: 313546

## Software and performances

- Organization:
- W.Lampl for commissioning software (together with R.Lafaye and M.Vincter). Agreed with P3 commissioning coordinators
- K.Bernadet (already in charge of Lar software integration) is main LAr contact on the “tag-approval” list.
- Atlas software validation effort being improved, validation contacts  from combined performance groups and physics group

## Trigger software (from Xin)

1) LVL1 tower sum simulation: Fabienne Ledroit
2) LVL1 calo trigger simulation and SW: Alan Watson 
3) LVL2 BS conversion and calo reconstruction: Denis Damazio
4) LAr ROD data preparation for LVL2: Bertrand Laforge 
5) Tile ROD data preparation : Sasha, Valencia
6) LVL2 egamma corrections : Olivier Gaumer
7) EF calo reconstruction : Cibran Santa Marina
8) EF Egamma reconstruction : Teresa Foncesa
9) Using LAr cosmic data at LVL2 : Denis Damazio
10) TileMuId and using Tile cosmic data at LVL2 : Giulio Usai
11) RegionSelector : Fabienne, Denis
12) Calo trigger EDM : Denis, Cibran
13) Montoring: Till Eifert, Denis, ...
14) online integration: Xin Wu
15) SW validation: Denis, Cibran, Teresa

- 1) LVL1 tower sum simulation: Fabienne Ledroit
- 2) LVL1 calo trigger simulation and SW: Alan Watson
- 3) LVL2 BS conversion and calo reconstruction: Denis Damazio
- 4) LAr ROD data preparation for LVL2: Bertrand Laforge
- 5) Tile ROD data preparation : Sasha, Valencia
- 6) LVL2 egamma corrections : Olivier Gaumer
- 7) EF calo reconstruction : Cibran Santa Marina
- 8) EF Egamma reconstruction : Teresa Foncesa
- 9) Using LAr cosmic data at LVL2 : Denis Damazio
- 10) TileMuId and using Tile cosmic data at LVL2 : Giulio Usai
- 11) RegionSelector : Fabienne, Denis
- 12) Calo trigger EDM : Denis, Cibran
- 13) Montoring: Till Eifert, Denis, ...
- 14) online integration: Xin Wu
- 15) SW validation: Denis, Cibran, Teresa

## “Hot” issue in software & performance
 ~ 80% CSC simulations done with “wrong” G4 range cuts for Lar (1mm instead of 0.03mm)
Side effect of unrelated change in job transform used in grid production
Calibration samples and validation samples were processed with the correct range cut
Effects:
~3% change in EM energy scale (1% for HEC, ~5% for FCAL).  (Smaller than G4.7 uncertainty in energy scale prediction)
Some changes in shower shapes. Not dramatic but large enough to affect details of identification studies
Proposal from calo perf and e/gamma:
Redo as much as possible simulations with 0.03mm
“AOD” level fixing for “wrong” simulations until replaced 

-  ~ 80% CSC simulations done with “wrong” G4 range cuts for Lar (1mm instead of 0.03mm)
- Side effect of unrelated change in job transform used in grid production
- Calibration samples and validation samples were processed with the correct range cut
- Effects:
- ~3% change in EM energy scale (1% for HEC, ~5% for FCAL).  (Smaller than G4.7 uncertainty in energy scale prediction)
- Some changes in shower shapes. Not dramatic but large enough to affect details of identification studies
- Proposal from calo perf and e/gamma:
- Redo as much as possible simulations with 0.03mm
- “AOD” level fixing for “wrong” simulations until replaced

## Software releases:
Release 13 in progress now. 
Action list follow up:
Editor for calo note 3 (misalignment effect): R.Zitoun
Time for cosmics processing: Not much progress (problems to run on cosmic events with 12.X.0)

- Release 13 in progress now.
- Action list follow up:
- Editor for calo note 3 (misalignment effect): R.Zitoun
- Time for cosmics processing: Not much progress (problems to run on cosmic events with 12.X.0)