BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 739289

## Getting the Right Message to the Customer

## Panelists

- Paul Trotter, Southern Region Weather Forecast Office, New Orleans/Baton Rouge
- Brenda Phillips, Center for Study of Disasters and Extreme Events, Oklahoma State University
- Velma Deleveaux, Booz Allen Hamilton
- Naomi Moye, Abraham’s Group

**Moderators**

- Betty Hearn Morrow, SocResearch Miami
- Bryan Norcross, CBS4, Miami

- Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference

- March 23, 2006

## Discussion Questions:

- How can we help people relate to the _impact_ of the wind, storm surge, and precipitation predictions to make informed decisions?
- What do the behavioral surveys and other feedback systems tell us about the warnings?
- What worked well in 2005?
- Were there any innovative approaches that should be considered for adoption as protocols?
- What, if anything, might have improved appropriate preparation and evacuation response actions?
- In general, how might the NWS hurricane messages be more effective?

## The forecast was good.

**The forecast was good.**
**             ****Was the message heard and understood?**

## Adapted from Lindell, Michael K. and Ronald W. Perry. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities. Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA.

- Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference

- March 23, 2006

## RISK COMMUNICATION: A MULTISTATE SOCIAL PROCESS

**RISK COMMUNICATION:**** A MULTISTATE SOCIAL PROCESS**

- RECEIVING

- UNDERSTANDING

- BELIEVING

- PERSONALIZING

**Adapted from Tierney, K., M.K. Lindell and R. Perry. 2001**

- SENDING

- March 23, 2006

## Impacts & Actions

- Are they talking about our area?
- What could happen here?
- Are we REALLY in danger?
- What would be the best way to stay safe?
- How can we protect our property?
- What’s really feasible for us?
- What are the pros and cons?

- Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference

- March 23, 2006

## IN ORDER FOR WARNINGS TO RESULT IN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE:

**IN ORDER FOR WARNINGS TO RESULT IN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE:**

** ****They must come from credible sources. **
** ****They must be received.**
** ****They must be understood.**
**They must have personal meaning.**
**They should include action statements. **
**They often require confirmation.**
** ****The appropriate response must be possible!**

- Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference

- March 23, 2006

## Some Issues Identified in Exploratory Work:

-  Watches and warnings not well understood
-  May need a third category for imminent threat
-  Necessity for action not always clear
-  People gathering information from multiple sources before making their decisions

## Panelists

- Paul Trotter, Southern Region Weather Forecast Office, New Orleans/Baton Rouge
- Brenda Phillips, Center for Study of Disasters and Extreme Events, Oklahoma State University
- Velma Deleveaux, Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
- Naomi Moye, Abraham’s Group

**Moderators**

- Betty Hearn Morrow, SocResearch Miami
- Bryan Norcross, CBS4, Miami

- Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference

- March 23, 2006
# Presentation: 818893

## MESON LINAC 10 mA TUNED

- J.-P. Carneiro 20-FEB-07

## 10 mA 

- RT2	0.162047     -50.000000  252.099859      1.620467
- RT3	0.197925     -50.000000  307.916368      1.979248
- RT4	0.212456     -50.000000  330.522211      2.124556
- RT5	0.247910     -50.000000  385.679841      2.479102
- RT6	0.288165     -45.000000  407.526501      2.881648
- RT7	0.310823     -45.000000  439.570175      3.108231
- RT8	0.360042     -40.000000  470.001554      3.600421
- RT9	0.475300     -35.000000  580.234056      4.752999
- RT10	0.477216     -33.000000  569.014644      4.772158
- RT11	0.519517     -33.000000  619.453449      5.195174
- RT12	0.560175     -33.000000  667.932415      5.601753
- RT13	0.602225     -33.000000  718.070631      6.022247
- RT14	0.652331     -33.000000  777.815665      6.523311
- RT15	0.751495     -25.000000  829.183204      7.514952
- RT16	0.752625     -33.000000  897.401923      7.526246
- SSR1-1	1.013432     -27.000000  1137.401305     10.134320
- SSR1-2	1.103137     -27.000000  1238.080125     11.031375
- SSR1-3	1.178332     -27.000000  1322.473330     11.783324
- SSR1-4	1.237857     -27.000000  1389.279431     12.378570
- SSR1-5	1.285442     -27.000000  1442.685832     12.854425
- SSR1-6	1.322541     -27.000000  1484.322228     13.225408
- SSR1-7	1.311660     -30.000000  1514.574934     13.116604
- SSR1-8	1.506762     -10.000000  1530.005960     15.067617
- SSR1-9	1.022941     -49.380000  1571.243308     10.229410

- CAVITY

- ENERGY
- GAIN
- [MeV]

- PHASE
- [Deg]

- Veff
- [kV]

- BEAM
- POWER
- [kW]

- 10 mA

## 10 mA 

- SSR2-2		1.353528     -30.000000  1562.919864     13.535283
- SSR2-3		1.358540     -30.000000  1568.706817     13.585400
- SSR2-4		1.356987     -30.000000  1566.913677     13.569870
- SSR2-5		1.351481     -30.000000  1560.556179     13.514813
- SSR2-6		1.348224     -30.000000  1556.795241     13.482242
- SSR2-7		1.343757     -30.000000  1551.637052     13.437571
- SSR2-8		1.541500     0.270000    1541.517538     15.415004
- SSR2-9		0.546976     -69.660000  1573.621316     5.469756
- TSR1-1		2.300861     -25.000000  2538.719201     23.00861
- TSR1-2		2.410845     -25.000000  2660.073126     24.108450
- TSR1-3		2.510544     -25.000000  2770.078283     25.105435
- TSR1-4		2.597103     -25.000000  2865.585946     25.971029
- TSR1-5		2.665622     -25.000000  2941.188763     26.656223
- TSR1-6		2.727718     -25.000000  3009.704162     27.277183
- TSR1-7		2.775324     -25.000000  3062.231152     27.753239
- TSR1-8		2.819249     -25.000000  3110.697063     28.192490
- TSR1-9		2.854704     -25.000000  3149.816931     28.547036
- TSR1-10		2.879197     -25.000000  3176.842574     28.791972
- TSR1-11		2.773327     -30.000000  3202.362580     27.733273

- CAVITY

- ENERGY
- GAIN
- [MeV]

- PHASE
- [Deg]

- Veff
- [kV]

- BEAM
- POWER
- [kW]

- 10 mA
# Presentation: 266174

## Specific Clinical/Regulatory Issues in Development of Drugs for Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain

- <date/time>

- Specific Clinical/Regulatory Issues in Development of Drugs for Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain

- Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS
- Medical Officer
- Division of Anesthetics, Critical Care and Addiction Drug Products, FDA

## Basic Challenge

- FFDCA:
*“**...substantial evidence that the drug will have the effect it purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the proposed labeling thereof...” *
- Challenge:
- To operationalize the substantial evidence requirement into clinical trial design and clinical development planning for drugs to treat peripheral neuropathy and neuropathic pain.

## Example A

*Company’s proposed claimed effect:*
- To slow or reverse the progression of diabetic polyneuropathy
*Trials design issues:*
- Appropriate outcome measure(s)
- No regulatory precedent/Few large-scale trials
- Composite versus single measure
- Magnitude of effect is important
- Slowing progression versus arresting disease versus reversing disease
- Role of electrophysiologic testing
- Symptoms versus change in course of disease

## Example B

*Company’s proposed claimed effect:*
- The treatment of chronic neuropathic pain due to diabetes mellitus
*Clinical trial design issues:*
- Appropriate outcome measure(s)
- Pain, function, quality of life
- Symptom characteristics
- Magnitude of effect is important
- Role of potential confounders
- Severity of nerve dysfunction
- Level of diabetic control
- Durability of effect

## Example C

*Sponsor’s proposed claimed effect:*
- Treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia
*Clinical development plan:*
- Degree to which data from one etiology of neuropathic pain can support data for another etiology of neuropathic pain
- Generalizability of results to types of neuropathic pain not studied
# Presentation: 356776

## ARCHIVE ATTRIBUTES

**PROS**:
-   Human Readable
-   Standards optional
-   Simple to catalog
**CONS**:
-   Bulk
-   Narrow breadth of access
-   Manual search
-   Replication limited
-   Backup copy limited

**SCRIBED**

**PROS:**
-   Compact
-   Easily replicated
-   Amenable to search queries
-   Info can be manipulated
-   Broad breadth of access
-   Amenable to backup protection
**CONS:**
-   System dependent
-   Standards required
-   Longevity dependent on too
-    many variables (i.e., systems,
-    environment, preventative
-    maintenance)
-   Extraordinary steps required
-    to avoid corruption (handling,
-    controlled access)
-   Long-term credibility directly
-    proportional to extent of metadata

**DIGITIZED**

**ARCHIVE ATTRIBUTES**

## ARCHIVE ISSUES

-   Sufficient metadata for long-term
-    servicing
-   Systems obsolescence
-   Media deterioration
-   Mandatory migration for extended
-    retention
-   Intrusion protection
-   Copy credibility
-   Standards utility
-   Disposal
-   Access services supported
-   Maintenance costs
-   Backup

**DIGITIZED**

##  SCRIBED DATA

**U**
**N**
**I**
**T**
**V**
**O**
**L**
**U**
**M**
**E**

- 0 AD

- 1000 AD

- 2000 AD

***TIME***

** ****SCRIBED DATA**
-  HUMAN READABLE
-         (SHELVES)

**    ****SCRIBED**
** ****PLUS DIGITAL**
**      ****DATA**
-     COMPUTER
-   REVOLUTION
-        (FILES)

-  Gutenberg
- Printing Press

- DARK **AGES**

- Alexandria
-   Library
# Presentation: 457002

## AHRQ’s National Resource Center for Health Information Technology 

*Needs Assessment: Selected Early Findings from AHRQ Health IT Projects*
- April 2005

## Core Characteristics (1):Organizations Making Up the Consortium

- Percent THQIT projects that include:
- Acute care hospitals: 78 percent*(95 % of planning)*
- Ambulatory care: 74 percent*(80 % of implementation)*
- Long-term care: 17 percent
- Pharmacies: 15 percent *(25 % of implementation)*
- Home care: 12 percent
- Specific IT vendors: 10 percent
- Emergency departments: 9 percent
- State/local public health: 8 percent
- Psychiatric hospitals: 1 percent
**2/3 of all projects include multiple care settings *****(82 % of planning)***

## Core Characteristics (2):Demographics and Populations Served

- Key characteristics:
- 57 percent rural by RFA’s definition*(76 % of planning)*
- 12 percent inner-city*(18 % implementation)*
- 8 percent children’s health
- 7 percent women’s health
- Other populations served:
- Women
- Disabled
- Elderly
- Minorities

**THQIT: Rural Projects**

## Core Characteristics (3):Relevant Systems and Technologies

- EMR/EHR: 39 percent*(53 % of implementation)*
- Clinical decision support systems: 25 percent
- Health data exchange systems: 15 percent
- Telehealth: 14 percent
- Outpatient CPOE: 13 percent
- Inpatient CPOE: 11 percent
- Bar coding: 5 percent
- e-Prescribing: 5 percent

**Breakdown of THQIT projects by relevant systems, technologies***blue: implementation**red: planning*
*yellow: value*

## Profile Findings (1):Prioritized Project Goals (n = 84)

**Profile Findings (1):****Prioritized Project Goals *****(n = 84)***

**Issues listed as priority****(***all projects)*** **
- Improve health care outcomes: 85 percent
- Reduce medical errors:76 percent
- Improve inter provider communication:76 percent
- Improve clinical work flow:63 percent
- Reduce cost of care:54 percent
- Improve administrative efficiency: 37 percent
- Improve patient satisfaction: 39 percent

**Prioritized goals**** ***(% of projects)**yellow: value*
*blue: implementation**red: planning*

## Profile Findings (2):Significant challenges (n = 84)

**Profile Findings (2):****Significant challenges *****(n = 84)***

- Planning Grantees
- Data integration: 72 percent
- Securing funding: 72 percent
- Clinician buy-in: 45 percent
- Clinical workflow: 41 percent
- Implementation Grantees
- Additional Funding: 41 percent
- Clinical workflow: 53 percent
- Value Grantees
- Data integration: 33 percent
- Clinician buy-in: 38 percent

**Significant challenges**** ***(% of projects)*blue: implementationred: planning
- yellow: value
# Presentation: 697542

## NISN Services Support

## Table of Content

- _[Mission Data Services](slide3.xml)_
- _[Video Teleconferencing Support](slide4.xml)_
- _[Voice Teleconferencing Support](slide5.xml)_
- Facsimile Support
- Data Services Support

## Mission Service Support

- Contact Comm Managers
-  301-286-6141
- Information to be provided
- Site ID
- Circuit Number or point to point Locations
- Description of Trouble

## Video Teleconferencing Support

- Contact NISN Helpdesk
- 1-800-424-9920
- (256)-544-4357
- Information to Be Provided
- Site ID (MSFC1, JSC2, Hq1,etc....)
- Building And Room Number
- Codec Id #
- Confirmation Number Of Conference (None for Point to Point Conferences)
- Number Dialed
- Type Of Impact, If Any, To Conference

## Voice Teleconferencing Support

- Contact NISN Helpdesk
- 1-800-424-9920
- (256)-544-4357
- Information to be Provided
- Conference Title
- Conference Leader
- Description of Impact
- Equipment Tag Number (CSOC or NEMS)

## Facsimile Support

- Contact NISN Helpdesk
- 1-800-424-9920
- (256)-544-4357
- Information to be Provided
- Equipment Tag Number (CSOC or NEMS)
- Fax Phone Number
- Description of Impact

## Data Services Support

- Contact NISN Helpdesk
- 1-800-424-9920
- (256)-544-4357
- Information to be Provided
- Site ID
- Circuit Number or point to point Locations
- Description of Trouble
# Presentation: 498961

## The Role of Local Public Health in Outbreak and Event ManagementTestimony to AHIC Population Health and Clinical Connection Workgroup

- Paula Soper, MPH
- National Association of County
- and City Health Officials
- March 29, 2007

## Role of Local Health Departments (LHDs) in Outbreak and Event Management

**Source: ****NACCHO ****| ****National Profile of Local Health Departments ****2005**

## Role of Local Health Departments (LHDs) in Outbreak and Event Management

- Domain areas differ
- Environmental
- Foodborne
- Communicable
- Natural disaster
- Chemical or radiological

## Role of Local Health Departments (LHDs) in Outbreak and Event Management

- Detect
- Identify
- Investigate
- Manage
- Contain

## Data Needs for Outbreak and Event Management

- Needs differ by event type
- Food borne outbreak that grows to multi-state resulting in recall
- Possible case of an emerging infectious disease that is highly contagious and would be of national importance
- Local outbreak of a vaccine preventable disease that starts on a small scale and escalates
- Large environmental event

## Laws and Ordinances Governing Data Collection

- No identified challenges with state or local laws
- HIPAA – perception barrier

- Privacy

- Security

- Confidentiality

## Potential of HIT for Data Exchange

- Enhance ability to identify, verify, investigate, manage and contain
- Increase timeliness
- Decrease redundancy
- Reduce burden on public health and healthcare sectors
- Enhance communication capabilities

## Potential of HIT for Data Exchange

**Source: Informatics at Local Health Departments: **Findings from the 2005 National Profile of local health departments Study

## Use of Standards

**Source: Informatics at Local Health Departments: **Findings from the 2005 National Profile of local health departments Study

## Potential of HIT to Improve Response Management

**Source: Informatics at Local Health Departments: **Findings from the 2005 National Profile of local health departments Study

## Data Exchange with RHIOs/HIEs

- Of 103 LHDs that have responded:
- 42 have some involvement with a RHIO/HIE
- 19 of the 42 are actually exchanging data between public health and the RHIO/HIE

**Source:Preliminary results of RHIO/HIE Collaboration with Public Health**

## Data Exchange with RHIOs/HIEs

**Source:Preliminary results of RHIO/HIE Collaboration with Public Health**

## Challenges: Control of Resources

**Source: ****NACCHO ****| ****National Profile of Local Health Departments ****2005**

## Questions?

## Contact Information

- Paula Soper, MPH
- Senior Analyst for Public Health Informatics
- National Association of County and City Health Officials
- phone: 202-783-5550 ext 248
- mobile: 202-841-9473
- fax: 202-783-1583
- www.naccho.org
# Presentation: 425764

## SURVEY RESULTS

- Congressman Honda’s
- 2005-2006 Student Advisory Council
- May 13th, 2006

## According to the data, 53% of you have been in a car where the driver had been drinking. 

## 77% of you believe alcohol is easily accessible.

## 86% of you would talk to a friend if you were aware that he/she was drinking and driving. 

## 91% of you feel that homosexuality should be acceptable in our society. 

## 46% of you feel that drinking is a problem at your school.

## 43% of you use phrases referencing sexual orientation (i.e., "that's so gay", etc.). 

## 91% of you hear people around you using words referencing sexual orientation (i.e., "that's so gay", etc.).

## 75% of you believe the media (movies, TV, etc.) has caused society to be more accepting of homosexuals.

## 17% of you know someone who was involved in a date rape. 

## Do you ever feel that you are at risk of date rape? 

9% of you responded YES.

- _9%_ of you responded YES.

## 18% of you feel pressured to engage in sexual activity.

## Do you feel that when teenagers have sex, drugs or alcohol are typically involved? 

50% of the Audience feel when teenagers have sex, drugs or alcohol are typically involved.

- _50%_ of the Audience feel when teenagers have sex, drugs or alcohol are typically involved.

## Being a virgin while in high school is important to 50% of you.

## In the last month, 30% of you have used controlled substances.

## In the audience, 42% of you believe that 
anti-drug commercials are effective with teens.

- anti-drug commercials are effective with teens.

## The use of medicinal marijuana, according to 64% of you, should be legalized.

## 22% of you feel pressure to experiment with drugs/alcohol from your friends.

## In the audience, 70% of you know students who have eating disorders at your school.

## 42% of the audience knows a student that has used steroids at your school. 

## If you knew that a friend had an eating disorder or was using steroids, 80% would talk to that person about their situation. 

## 1/3 or 33% of the audience dislikes the way they look. 

## 44% of you feel pressure to lose weight, bulk up, etc. in order to look “better”. 

## At your schools, 75% of you feel there is a lot of pressure to attend good colleges. 

## Of the audience members, 68% believe there is an overemphasis placed on which college students attend after high school.

## Your parents put too much pressure on you to succeed in high school and get into the “best” university is a common belief among 49% of you. 

## 62% of the audience has participated in activities simply to put the activity on college applications.

## 42% of the audience feel pressured to resort to unethical means (cheating, etc) to get good grades in school in order to attend the “best” college.

## 87% of the audience participate in clubs, athletics, or student government.

## In the audience, 80% of you volunteer outside of school in your community, church, government, etc. 

## In the audience, 47% of your parents volunteer in your community, church, government activities, etc.
# Presentation: 536003

## ANL DTF Site Map

**ANL DTF Site Map**

- 8

- STARLIGHT - GbE

***Existing******Facilities***

-    Gigabit Enet
-    10 Gigabit Enet
-    Myrinet
-    Fibre Channel
-    Direct Video Link

- Myrinet 2000CLOS switch

- 10 storage nodes

- Display WallsAG Nodes
- CAVE

- 1

- 10

- 3xIBM FASTt700
-  20 TB FC Storage

- 2

- 10

- 4 login nodes

- 96 compute nodes1.2 TF, 0.5 TB Memory

- 4 mgmt nodes

- 96

- 10

- 96

- 96

**DTF Backplane****Connection**

- CiscoGSR

- MREN – OC-12

- HSCC – OC-48

- ESNet – OC-12

- Linux Cluster574p IA-32

- HPSS and ADSM
- 120 TB archive

- 2

- 1

- 1 per

- 96 viz nodesPentium4GeForce4 graphics

- 96

- Linux Cluster350p Pentium4

- 8

**Juniper Border Router**

- Cisco6509

- Charlie Catlett

## ANL DTF/ETF Visualization

**ANL DTF/ETF Visualization**

- Networking:
- Conection to TeraGrid Backbone
- Internal connections, myrinet, gigE

- 32 graphics cards wired to ANL video switch fabric, 64 graphics cards dedicated to remote and batch rendering

- 96 dual P4 with GeForce4 graphics chipset

- 32 dual McKinley, upgraded to 96 dual Madison

## ANL Visualization Services

**Grid Rendering Service**
- Development of Visualization Grid services, Visualization “portal”
- Batch-mode rendering
- Submit data sets with parameters for rendering (e.g. volume rendering) and visualization
- Generates visualization results, delivers to remote site, archive, etc.
**Advanced Remote Tiled Displays**
- Support streaming visualization to networked visualization devices (tiled displays, virtual environments, etc.
# Presentation: 009855

## Run-8 in February and beyond*

**Barbara Jacak**
**for the PHENIX Collaboration**

*** we hope!**

## It is absolutely crucial to run p+p!

**RHIC/Collaboration Issue**
**2 years in a row without p+p running will send the spin community looking elsewhere**
**RIKEN**
**New MOU with BNL started in 2007**
**2****nd**** year without spin run poses a significant difficulty**
**	****likely to damage credibility with RIKEN, MEXT**
**Milestone: First W measurement by March 2011**
**	****requires production running in Run-9 or 10**

## 200 GeV p+p goal:

**3****, 2, ****1**** ******** errors**

**to achieve this, need**
**≥ ****71 pb****-1 ****recorded**
**DOE milestone for ********G**
**measurement: 2008**

**PHENIX remains committed to yearly p+p running,**
**to develop required luminosity & polarization.**
**Next goal is 500 GeV p+p for W production**

## minimum 200 GeV p+p run for new physics

**5 pb****-1**** of transverse p+p recorded****-> 5 weeks of p+p, transversely polarized, physics running.****    is 7 cryo weeks enough??**
**goal: forward physics with MPC**
******0**** in MPC + charged pion single spin asymmetry**
**need a lot more p+p for the Spin Plan milestone. **
**This is a *****minimum***** data set for some new physics**

## if 4-5 cryo weeks: 500 GeV p+p

**Goals**
**- demonstrate 500 GeV collisions **
**- establish 250 GeV polarimetry in both p-C and H-Jet polarimeters**
**- measure cross section for neutral pions & photons**
**	*****compare to pQCD, publish!***
**- W ****→**** e****±**
**	****rate: 68 e (single sign) per week *****for 3.6 pb******-1******/week***
***	******assume Run-6 ******L****** x 2.5 for emittance shrinkage***
***- *****measure J/******** and Y: 1500/40 J/********/Y ******** per week**
**- study muon backgrounds for W measurement**
**Important step toward RIKEN RHIC deliverables!**

**backup slides**

## forward 0 RdA with the MPC

**Qiu/Vitev, PLB 632, 507 (2006)**
**coherent multiple scattering**

- y=3

- y=4

**Vitev, hep-ph/0609156**
**+ initial state energy loss**

**Kharzeev, et al, PLB599**
**CGC**

## From our previous Run-7 request

**approximately**
**what’s expected**
**for Run-8**

## Run-8 polarized p+p

**71 pb****-1****  recorded (167 delivered) **
**to measure ********G (aim to follow RHIC Spin Plan)**

**goal**

## Run 9 & 10 plan

**complete large 200 GeV/A Au+Au data set**
**→ ****definitive measurements with rarest probes**
**if needed, complete 200 GeV polarized p+p**
**begin 500 GeV polarized p+p for W production**
**aim to begin low energy scan & utilize HBD**

**Run-9**

**begin commissioning VTX detector (HBD removed)**
**→ ****both p+p and heavy ion running**
**ion species/energy depend on Runs-7,9 and EBIS**
**significant 500 GeV polarized p+p for W production**
**utilizing muon trigger**

**Run-10**
# Presentation: 537907

## WG27th JuneSummaries & Plans

- Masaharu Aoki, Osaka University
- June 5-11, 2003
- NuFACT'03
- Columbia University

## Summary of

- talks at 6th June
- Totally Biased Personal Point of View

## Muon Physics

- The muon is the best place to search for new physics beyond the Standard Model.	(A. de Gouvea, D. Nomura, M. Koike)
- Muon LFV		*Forbidden Process*
- MEG(A. Baldini), MECO(P. Yamin), PRISM/PRIME(A. Sato)
- Muon EDM		*Suppressed Process*
- J-PARC LoI (W. Morse)
- Muon g-2		*Precise Measurement*
- BNL result and J-PARC LoI (L. Roberts)
- Muon lifetime		*Precise Measurement*
- RAL experiment (D. Tomono), muLan(G. Onderwater)
- Michel parameters, etc.	*Precise Measurement*
- T-violation(W. Fetscher), TWIST(P. Kitching)

## SUSY with the Muon

- -LFV

- -EDM

- g-2

- -e conversion
-   e 

- quark

- lepton (neutrino)

- slepton

- squark

- normal particles

- SUSY particles

- ex. K-decays, B-decays

- ex. neutrino oscillation

- ex. charged lepton LFV

- CPV

**

**

- Golden Trio

## New Generation of Muon Experiments

- Muon Lepton Flavor Violation
- BR(  e ) < 10-14 (MEG)
- BR( N  e N) < 10-16 (MECO)
*BR(**** N ** e N) < 10**-18*(PRISM)
- -EDM (J-PARC LoI)
- d < 10-19 e.cm * d**** < 10**-24** e.cm*
- g-2 (J-PARC LoI)
- 0.7 ppm  *0.05 ppm*

## Muon as Tools

- Unstable nuclear physics
- Muonic X-rays from unstable nuclei.(P. Strasser)
- Many applications such as -SR, -CF, radiography, etc.

## Why Muon Physicsat Neutrino Factories

- Staging

## Neutrino Factory

- Pion Capture

- Phase Rotation

- Ionization Cooling

- Muon Acceleration

- Muon Storage Ring

- Proton Driver

## Muon & Neutrino Factory

## Today's WG2 Agenda
# Presentation: 480258

## NAI EC Meeting & Site VisitSeptember 19-22, 2005

- Karen J. Meech, Astronomer
- Institute for Astronomy, UH

## Slide 2

## Schedule

| Mon 9/19 | 07:30-14:30 | Mauna Kea Tour (lunch at Hale Pohaku) |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | 15:30-17:00 | Site Visit for NAI 2007 – Property Tour |
|  | 17:00-18:30 | Executive Council Business |
|  | 19:00- | Dinner – Kamuela Provision Company |
| Tue 9/20 | 07:30-12:30 | Executive Council Business |
|  | 12:30-13:30 | Lunch |
|  | 13:30-16:00 | Science Presentations |
|  | 16:00 | To Airport, HNL (arrive 19:45) |
| Wed 9/21 | 09:00-09:20 | At IfA – Introduction & Welcome |
|  | 09:20-10:45 | Lab Tours (IR, Pan Starrs, AO) |
|  | 10:45-12:30 | Science Presentations |
|  | 12:30-13:30 | Lunch |
|  | 14:00-15:00 | Science Presentations |
|  | 15:00-17:30 | Lab Tours (until 16:00 for NAI Dir – Chancellor) |
|  | 17:30 | President/Chancellor Office Reception |
| Thu 9/22 |  | Research ship tour? |
|  |  | Science Presentations |
|  | Mid-afternoon | Visit end. |

## MKO Tour

- 1:15 hr drive each direction to HP, 30 min to top
- Time at visitor center (acclimatize)
- Visit 2 telescopes; Lunch at Hale Pohaku

## Hilton Waikoloa

- $165+tax (3 pre & post)
- Booking
- _[www.HiltonWaikoloaVillage.com](http://www.hiltonwaikoloavillage.com/)_
- 1-800-Hiltons
- Give them the Group Reference code (avial next week)

## Hilton Layout

## Volcano Park

- _[www.nps.gov/havo](http://www.nps.gov/havo)_
- 3 hr drive from Kona
- Museum, sulfur vents, lava tubes, Halemaumau
- Hiking to lava – this is partly closed off now (collapse)
- 2.5 miles (rough)
- Hiking boots
- 2-3 liters water
- Flashlight
- Long pants, hat, sunscreen

## Radisson Waikiki Prince Kuhio Hotel – Oahu

- Kuhio Executive Class (KEC)
- Mountain view   $125
- Ocean view       $135
- Kuhio Club        $145 (w/bfast)
- Reservations
- 888-557-4422
- _[www.radisson.com/waikikihi](http://www.radisson.com/waikikihi)_
- KEC rates must be made by UH staff (so please give Michele Sonoda your info)
- On vacation until 8/8

## What is Needed

- Travel Info from
- Mancinelli
- Mumma
- Ohmoto
- Woolf
- Young
- Ward
- Goolish, Runnegar, Wilmoth
- MKO tour yes/no – closed after 8/9

- For those coming to Oahu site visit part
- Need to book flight Kona-HNL HA 247 ASAP
- Luther – (UC Berkeley) – call Lori Serakawa 808-593-8808 to pay
- loris@citytravel.agencymail.com
# Presentation: 354366

## MECO Extraction & Extinction

- What is being discussed ?
- simulations plan ?

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## What is being discussed?

- Who?
- L. Ahrens, M. Brennan, M. Blaskiewicz, K. Brown, W. Glenn, Y.Y. Lee, W. Morse, T. Roser, Y. Semertzidis, J. Wei
- Extraction
- Bunched beam slow extraction method
- KOPIO style of extraction with a 750 kHz RF source
- Fixed frequency slow extraction with RF knock-out method
- Extinction
- AC-dipole w/ strip-line kickers
- Short pulse resonant kicker, pre-cleaner
- h=2 second RF system
- High frequency quadrupole
- What else?
- Impedance, proximity to transition, spill structure, emittance

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## Extraction

- Bunched beam slow extraction
- Pro’s
- Fixed extraction energy (same energy front/back of spill)
- Main accelerator components static, not ramped
- Bunch structure fixed (widths and frequency)
- Only modification is spill feedback to RF system
- Con’s
- Spill structure
- High peak currents during spill and while in close proximity to transition energy (note: it is possible there may be a trade off between how close we can run to transition, to get good extinction, and how far we have to push away, to get stability).
-  how good is the dynamic range and stability of the low level RF system as the beam slowly disappears from the accelerator and how does this affect spill, efficiency, and extinction.
- KOPIO style extraction with 750 kHz RF cavity?
- RF Knock-out ?

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## Extinction

- AC-dipole & strip-line kickers
- Possible problems
- Main issue is the effectiveness of this system strongly depends on the tune spread in the beam.
- If on constantly, can end up with a stable amplitude distribution of particles. To de-cohere these stable islands requires the system to be run in a burst mode. Is this acceptable to get good extinction?
- Risk of vertical emittance growth. Acceptable?
- Short pulse resonant kicker pre-cleaner
- Build a vertical kicker that runs for ~10 turns @  the betatron frequency.
- Could operate in a burst mode during spill.

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## Extinction

- h=2 second RF cavity system = momentum aperture

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## Extinction

- High frequency quadrupole

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown

## Simulations Plan

- Initial focus of simulations is
- Simulate “standard” plan; ac-dipole with strip-lines.
- Understand proximity to transition
- Beam dynamics near transition
- Required RF voltage, lattice structure, etc.
- Impedance of new devices
- Spill structure correction
- Causes of emittance growth
- Hmm? Mechanisms that affect extinction?

- AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting  K.Brown
# Presentation: 019532

## Computational tools for process modeling 

## Computational heat- and mass transfer models can be routinely used to describe weld pool shape as a function of composition and process parameters.

***Work of T. DebRoy’s group at Penn State University.***
***However, industrial use of these models is still evolving.***

## There are many models to describe weld microstructure.

***Carbon equivalence relates the volume fraction of martensite and bainite with time to cool from 800 to 500°C***
***Ion, Ashby and Easterling***
***Very successful but not good for slow cooling rate and low carbon steels***
***Using equations based on TTT/CCT information***
***Work of Kirkaldy et al. 1982, & Watt et al. 1988***
***Not good for low carbon steels***
***Phenomenological models of austenite decomposition to various ferrite phases***
***Bhadeshia et al. 1985***
***Simultaneous transformation kinetics equations***
***Jones and Bhadeshia, 1997***

## Models relating microstructure and property are still semi-empirical.

***There is a need for fundamental models to relate this as a function of strain rate, temperature and microstructure***

## We need to develop flexible, internet based, integrated weld process models for ease of use and critical evaluations.

***ORNL research is focussing on problem solving environment for developing such integrated process models. ***
# Presentation: 134965

## Opening Remarks

- Welcome
- Thanks for coming
- Apologies
- I’m kind of new to this, so there are some people I’ve left out.
- Please spread the word of our interest.
- Administrative details:
- Please get me copies of any transparencies (electronic preferred), and I’ll circulate them along with the minutes.

## What We Hope to Accomplish

- Nail down the technical specifications for the proposed hadron therapy facility at the Fermilab Industrial Park, particularly:
- Specifications for the front-end linac
- Should the proposal include a synchrotron?
- Establish as much commonality with other projects as possible.
- Proton driver
- New Fermilab linac
- Other facilities worldwide
- Identify viable vendors for accelerator components.

## Schedule

- 10-12: Hornet's Nest (Wilson Hall 8th Floor Crossover)
- Welcome - E. Prebys (15 minutes)
- Project Overview and Status of Business Proposal - A. Lennox (45min)
- Requirements of 8 GeV Linac and Comments on AccSys - W. Foster (20 min.)
- Taiwanese Interest - G.P. Yeh (20 min.)
- Discussions (20 min.)
- 12-1 Lunch
- 1-3: RaceTrack (Wilson Hall 7th Floor Crossover)
- Indian Linac - V. Bharadwaj (30 min)
- Proposed proton therapy synchrotron - S. Peggs (45 min.)
- Discussions and additional talks (45 min.)
# Presentation: 060295

## Effects of Substrate Flow Regime on Bacterial Dynamics in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)

- Elinor Davis – SLSTP 2004
- PI: Tony Rector – Dynamac Corporation

## Project Description

- This project centered around a previous experiment involving membrane bioreactors (MBR). The primary objective was to determine the effects of varying flow regime of influent substrate to bacterial communities. Past studies showed that a significant variation with respect to bacterial dynamics was exhibited when substrate flow was changed from pulse to continuous input. While it is not known if this operational change was solely responsible for the physiological shift in bacterial attachment, studies were setup to determine if significant deviation was present between the two flow regimes.

## Background 

- Advanced Life Support (ALS) water recovery systems regenerate dirty water to remove organic and nitrogen compounds filtered into a more usable effluent (2)
-  An MBR is used for the treatment of space-generated waste streams
-  Combines suspended-growth reactors with the capability of solids separation using membrane technology
-  Amount of wastewater processed is increased due to the membranes allow for a high biomass concentration within the reactor
-  Slow-growing microbes and faster-growing bacteria are able to grow in the same bioreactor due to long solid retention times (STR)
-  In a recent MBR study it was observed that a variation in bacterial dynamics was exhibited when the feed regime was changed from pulse to continuous (1)

**Study Setup and Objectives**
-  4-CSTR reactors were used with a stir-bar for fluidization.  A nutrient-rich feed solution and an air stream also were provided.
-  Evaluate effects of different feed regimes as well as determine specific substrate utilization rates and evaluate differences in microbial dynamics due to feed variation.

## Conclusions and References 

- References
- 1. Garland J, Hummerick M, Levine L, Roberts M, Strayer R. (2003) Integrated Evaluation of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Technology: Phase II –Nitrification Establishment. NASA. TDP. Year 2 Final Report.
- 2. Kortenkamp D, Bell S. (2003) Simulating Advanced Life Support Systems for Integrated Controls Research. SAE International. Paper # 2003-01-2546.
- 3. Rittman, B .E, McCarty, P. L. (2001) Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications.  McGraw Hill Inc, New York.

- Conclusions
-  From the analysis, a lag of cells is seen in the pulse fed reactors.  This may not indicate significant deviation from continuous fed reactors.
-  Visual analysis of the reactors showed a larger accumulation of wall growth in the pulse fed reactors.
- In a previous MBR study (2), attached biofilm was present at the time of the modified flow regime.  This could not be duplicated in this study due to the required time to develop a steady biofilm prior to the experiment.  This may have led to significant changes in the operation and the bacterial dynamics of the reactor systems.
# Presentation: 578482

## 

Good, Bad, or Ugly Presentation

Steve Sultemeier
Sandia National Laboratories
May 26, 2005

**Good, Bad, or Ugly Presentation**
- Steve Sultemeier
- Sandia National Laboratories
- May 26, 2005

- Sandia National Laboratories is managed and  operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

**ECCO 2005**

## DOE Order 580.1

-    High Risk Personal Property
- Management Section of the DOE-PMR
-   Export Controlled Property is
-  considered to be high risk property
-   Judgment call as to what level of export
-  controls require property to be
-  considered high risk property
-   Continuing saga of the sale of a Paragon
-        computer to Chinese national

## Handcarry Issues 

-  Potential Self-Disclosure for stuff
-      left in foreign country on TMP
-      exception
- Does any Lab grant waivers for IHF?
-   Pen drives, cell phones, wireless cards?
-  Effective Control Advice
-  Controls for annual blanket form?

## International Programs Issues

-   Seems to be a general lack of “Know Your
-      Customer” in the overall coordination with
- DOE/NNSA
-    Last minute coordination with export control
-  issues
-   Attitude of “What can we do to get
-  around  export controls?” instead of
-  “What can we do to comply with export
-   controls?”

## Self-Assessments 

-   Trade with each other
-   Outside look at program
-   Non-attribution basis – Self
-       report
-   Funding and time will always be
-       an issue
# Presentation: 356557

## WELCOME

***WELCOME***

***PolarMax 2005***

***Hosted by the NPOESS Integrated Program Office***
***http://www.npoess.noaa.gov***

***to***

## Today’s Agenda

_***Thursday – October 27, 2005***_
***0730  Doors Open***
***0800  Welcome***
***0815  Keynote***
***0845  Session 5-Future Polar-Orbiting Systems***
***1000  Break***
***1030  Future Polar-Orbiting Systems Cont’d***
***1200  Lunch***
***1250  Session 6 – Future Sensor Applications***
***1445  Break***
***1515  Future Sensor Applications***
***1700  Closing Remarks***

## NOAA Auditorium

_***NOAA Auditorium***_
*** ******No Eating or Drinking in Auditorium***
***	******Allowed in the Lobby, ***
***	******Science Center, and Outside***
*** ******Guest Computers***
***	******Located in Rear of Auditorium***
***	******(Please Use During Breaks)***
*** ******Emergency Exits***
***	******Rear and Front of Auditorium***

## Science Center

_***Science Center***_
*** ******Exhibits and Poster Presentations***
***	******- Please don’t touch ***
***	******- Exhibits will be staffed ******	******  ******	******  during breaks***
*** ******Lunch***

## PolarMax 2005

*** ******Bring and Wear Badges Every Day***
*** ******Restrooms***
***	******Rear, Left of Science Center***
*** ******Emergency Phone Number***
***	****** ******(301) 713-4897 or (301) 713-4898 ***
***Someone will take calls/messages at all times ***
*** ******Questions / Problems??***
***	******Ask anyone with***
***             ******a badge like this***

*PolarMax 2005*

***EVENT STAFF***

***Kim Chamberlain***
***NOAA/NESDIS***

## Presenters

_***Presenters***_
***Back of the auditorium for  intro to equipment /meet with Session Chair***
***On-Deck Area – Left front immediately prior to presenting***
***Please contact IT personnel for last minute updates as soon as possible***
***Be prepared to take the stage***
***Be mindful of allotted time, including entry and exit***
***	******-  Timer shines yellow 5 min before end***

## Thank You

_***Thank You***_
***Sponsors, ***
***For the bus trip to the Smithsonian***
***For the best ball Golf Tournament at Andrews AFB******      ***

***PolarMax 2005***
***Feedback to:  polarmax@noaa.gov***
# Presentation: 609442

## Do-It-Yourself Biology

- Synthetic Biologist Drew Endy: *Programming Living Systems*

## Drew Endy Builds Genomes

*Synthetic biologist Endy works with the nuts and bolts of living things.*

*Genomes*
- Contain all of an organism’s genetic material
- Have “parts”
- May reveal how genes affect health

*Question:*
- Are all genomes identical?

- Photo: L. Barry Hetherington

## Answer: No

**Each organism has its own genome**

- But all organisms within a species have genomes with similar, or even identical, “parts”
- Sometimes the parts are similar to those in other species, too
- Genome organization—the order in which genes string together—creates templates for living things as diverse as people, penguins, and petunias

## Models for Discovery

- Bacteriophage: a virus that infects and destroys bacteria
- Endy and other scientists study the genome of the T7 bacteriophage

- T7 bacteriophage

## Uncovering Knowledge

- The Parts

- The Whole

- 56 genes
- Produce 60 proteins that direct stages and types of infection

- Genes cluster into several distinct classes
- T7 bacteriophage switches from expression of one class of genes to another to assure successful infection

**Genome of T7 bacteriophage**

## Building Knowledge

**Problem:** DNA in T7 bacteriophage is a program that needs to be decoded
**Typical approach:** Pry apart genome to investigate the function of each gene
**Endy’s approach:** Use genome’s parts to construct a synthetic, model genome of T7 bacteriophage that includes not only viral genes but also “cut-and-paste” sites in its DNA

- Investigate genes one-by-one

- Build genome from scratch, then study how whole thing works

## Advances in Synthetic Biology

- Endy’s synthetic T7 bacteriophage genome has “cut-and-paste” sites in its DNA
- Many genetic devices are designed to work only in the labs in which they were made
- There was no common framework for organizing all the components of biological machines

**What purpose do these DNA sites serve?**

**How did Endy and his coworkers overcome this challenge, and how have they shared this knowledge with other researchers?**

**What did Endy do to resolve this problem?**

## Adventures in Synthetic Biology

- Synthetic biology draws from skills in engineering and biology
- Endy created a comic book to help explain it

- Image: Drew Endy, Isadora Deese, Chuck Wadey

## On the Same Page

- The iGEM Competition
- Launched in 2004
- Community teaching tool that inspires students to build genetic machines with standard biological parts
- 2006 contest hosted teams from 37 schools from around the world (Slovenia was the grand-prize winner)

- Photo: Melissa Li

## The Future Is Now

- Run relay races
- Lie down to create a modern version of the Etch A Sketch® toy
- Work as photographic film

- Synthetic bacteria can work as machines

**World’s first living photograph**

- Photo: Aaron Chevalier (UT Austin), Jeff Tabor (UCSF)

## Research Applications

- What are some of the ethical and social dilemmas regarding synthetic biology?
# Presentation: 461059

## Science Archives in the 21st Century

***Ed Grayzeck***
***National Space Science Data Center***
***25 April, 2007***

## GOALS

- NSSDC will post summary and highlights from workshop
- One goal is to establish the level of commonality of problems and best practices, as seen by the archives, and their interest in continuing to communicate on such matters.
- Another goal is to identify broadly based techniques and best practices that address common concerns, and to get these identified and documented in a summary document.
- A third goal is to establish more frequent, alternative, modes of communication among the archives should this be of interest.
**This may include the establishment of ad hoc working groups to address particular issues and/or the development of best practices documents.**
# Presentation: 865653

## Tevatron BPM Upgrade 

**Stephen Wolbers**
**CD Accelerator Activities Coordination Meeting**
**June 7, 2005**

## Outline

**Project Status.**
**Closeout and Transfer to post-project operations.**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Project Status

**All hardware has been installed.**
**All functionality has been implemented or is in the advanced state of implementation.**
**Final work is needed on:**
**Pbar measurements.**
**Calibrations.**
**Diagnostics.**
**Hardware problems and bugs.**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Slide 4

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Project Closeout

**Bakul is working with me on final project closeout:**
**As-builts.**
**Final drawings.**
**Documentation.**
**Requirements validation.**
**Archiving of important information.**
**Closeout of charge codes.**
**Document unfinished task status and plans.**
**Goal is closeout by June 21, 2005.**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Transition to Operations

**Even though the project will officially close in June, 2005 there are ongoing tasks and most especially ongoing support for the system from CD and AD.**
**Operations codes are open for effort reporting.**
**Task codes of the project (26,56) have been phased out as the relevant parts of the project have been finished.**
**Sparing arrangements are being made.**
**Test stand disposition needs to be worked out.**
**Publication(s):**
**PAC2005**
**RT2005**
**Phys Rev ST AB**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Post-Project Long-Term Operations Support

**MOUs (hardware and software) lay out roles and responsibilities for long-term support (beams docDB 1503,1504)**
**Some details have to be worked out.**
**But one expects the following from CD, among other things:**
**Diagnosis and/or Repair of Echotek, timing and filter boards.**
**Diagnosis/Firmware changes of timing and filter boards.**
**Diagnosis/Software changes of front-end software.**
**Hardware tracking/storage.**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Who to complain to:

**Who to complain to:**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## Summary

**The TeV BPM Upgrade project is essentially complete and will be officially closed out (in the project sense) by the end of June.**
**Work will continue to operate the system and to finish documents, etc. beyond the June closeout.**
**Thank you to everyone in CD and AD who contributed to a successful project!**

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005

## And it really works!

- Stephen Wolbers                           CD Accelerator Activities

- June 7, 2005