BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
# Presentation: 265589

## Polar Scientists Explain 20 Year Mystery Behind Magnetospheric Radio Waves

**Every time we see hot plasma we see broadband electrostatic noise.**

**Polar Scientists Explain 20 Year Mystery Behind Magnetospheric Radio Waves**

**OBSERVATIONS:**
- The radio “noise” could be resolved as bubbles (particle depletions) and observed to flow from one spacecraft antenna to the next.
- Each bubble represents plasma that has lost some of its electrons.  Normally nature would immediately replenish the electrons, but the bubbles move so fast that nature does not have time to react.

**INTERPRETATION:**
- Like the discovery that living matter is composed of cells, we now know that hot plasmas have a universal feature heretofore unknown.

**IMPLICATIONS:**
- By understanding that electrical bubbles, not radio waves, are universally present in hot plasmas, conflicting ideas about plasma transport and acceleration processes can be resolved.

**Theories of every sort were proposed to explain the source of the radio waves, but none of the theories actually fit with observations.**

**We now know why the theories don’t fit: these were not radio waves.**

**Called “Electron Phase Space Holes”, ****bubbles flowing in the tenuous gas of space were creating the electrical signals**

**MEASUREMENTS:**
- Pioneering radio receivers with multiple antennas and high-speed digital electronics enabled Polar scientists to break through the barrier in understanding the origin of this broadband electrostatic noise.

## POLAR Spacecraft Pinpoints Location of Dayside Magnetic Reconnection

**POLAR Spacecraft Pinpoints Location of Dayside Magnetic Reconnection**

**INTEPRETATION:**
-  The measurements confirmed conjectures that the reconnection site should be located high above the Earth’s pole.
-  An unanticipated result was that the reconnection site remains more or less fixed for a very long period of time.

**IMPLICATIONS:**
-  Reconnection is the fundamental process for the transfer of energy and momentum from the sun into the dayside magnetosphere.
-  Understanding of this interaction between the Sun and Earth depends critically on the reconnection location.  Once the location is known, it becomes possible  to understand how and why.

**OBSERVATIONS:**
-  Particle and field measurements along with the unique vantage point of Polar made it possible to pinpoint the reconnection site and to remotely monitor this point for periods up to half an hour.
-  The solar wind was very steady for this case and the solar wind magnetic field was directed northward. These were ideal conditions to test our method of pinpointing the location of the reconnection site.

- The reconnection site (large circle) and the range over which the site varies during a twenty minute period (shaded region on either side of the circle).

**We have known that interconnection occurs between the magnetic fields of the Sun and the Earth.**

**Until now, we haven’t known where ...**
# Presentation: 000715

## Cultural Resources Training

- For NRCS field personnel
- For SWCD partners
- For clients and contractors

## Modules 1-6 Web-Based Training

- Provides cultural resources background
- NRCS policy and procedures
- Legal responsibilities
- Context in conservation planning

## Module 7

- State Level Agreements with State Historic Preservation Office and Tribal Agreements
- State compliance procedures
- Resource References (Undertakings List, Handbook for Cultural Resources, etc.)
- Videos/Lectures on state or regional culture history and early technologies

## Module 8 

- Field Exercises to identify cultural sites (burial mounds, prehistoric habitation sites, historic structures)
- Hands-on artifact identification
- Museum visits

## Artifact Identification

## Shovel-Testing at Koster Site

## Soil Flotation
# Presentation: 699385

## WBS 1.4 AGS Upgrade - Summary (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency)

- 					_Jan 04_		_Nov 04_		_Change_
- 1.4.1 AGS/Booster		$ 3,562		$15,184K	+ $11,624K
- 1.4.2	Switchyard		$   0		$ 3,244K	+ $ 3,244K
- 1.4.3 K0PI0			$ 5,573K	$ 6,960K	+ $ 1,387K
- 1.4.4 MECO			$ 4,773K	$ 7,634K	+ $ 2,861K
- 1.4.5 Project Office		$   0		$ 1,035K	+ $ 1,035K
- DIRECT TOTAL			$13,908K	$34,057K	+ $20,149K
- Total with Conting and Indirect	$21,268(est)	$52,080K	+ $30,082K
- 1.4.1.6 Beam Development --- not included

## WBS 1.4.1 AGS/Booster (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency)

- 					_Jan 04_		_Nov 04_		_Change_
- 1.4.1.1 Project Support		$    0.0		$   198K		+ $    198K
**NEW**
- 1.4.1.2 Booster		$    0.0		$ 3,712K	+ $ 3,712K
**NEW**
- 1.4.1.3 AGS			$    0.0		$ 7,431K	+ $ 7,431K
**NEW**
- 1.4.1.4 MECO Specific		$    654K	$   937K		+ $    283K
**added simulations and update of costs****	****(Hebert/Brown)**
- 1.4.1.5 K0PI0	Specific		$ 2,908K	$ 2,908K	+ $  0.0
**Not Updated (Brown)**
- TOTAL				$ 3,562		$15,186K	+ $11,624K
- 1.4.1.6 Beam Development --- not included

## WBS 1.4.2 Switchyard (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency)

- 				_Jan 04_		_Nov 04_		_Change_
- TOTAL		$   0		$ 3,244K	+ $ 3,244K
**NEW**

## WBS 1.4.3 K0PI0 Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency (C. Pearson)

- 			_Jan 04 (2001 est)_	_Nov 04_		_Change_
- TOTAL	$ 5,573K		$ 6,960K	+ $ 1,387K (25%)
**Revised Estimate**
- Some New items (> $100K)
- Security Mods			$ 228K
- D3 Sweeper			$ 489K
- PS Controls 			$ 248K
- D4 Gap Increase 			$ 170K
- Pit Size increase 			$ 200K
- 5 Year vs 3 Year Project 		$ 200K
- Added Exp Water Pump Skip 	$ 135K

## WBS 1.4.4 MECO Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency (Hebert/Phillips)

- 			_Jan 04 (2001 est)_	_Nov 04_		_Change_
- TOTAL	$ 4,773K*		$ 7,634K	+ $ 2,861K (60%)
**Revised Estimate**
- Some New items (> $100K)
- Beam Design			$ 256K
- Power Supply Upgrade		$ 417K
- New Magnets (2)			$ 198K
- Security 				$ 173K
- Controls	 			$ 184K
- Solenoid MGDM Support	 	$ 315K
- New Counting House 		$ 289K
*** Probably did not include all present items on our list**

## WBS 1.4.5 Project Office (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency)

- 				_Jan 04_		_Nov 04_		_Change_
- TOTAL		$   0		$ 1,035K	+ $ 1,035K
**NEW**
# Presentation: 180482

## WHY Target Crystalline Silica Exposure?

- Widespread occurrence & use
- Maritime
- Agriculture
- Construction
- General Industry
- Number of related deaths
- Number of exposed workers
- Health effects

## Occurrence of Crystalline Silica

- SiO2 is basic component of sand, quartz, & granite rock
- Quartz is 2nd most common mineral in earth’s crust
- Airborne silica is produced by, among other activities,
- 	*Sandblasting**	**	**	**Stonecutting*
*	**Rock drilling**	**	**	**Drilling*
*	**Roof bolting**	**	**	**Quarrying*
*	**Foundry work**	**	**	**Tunneling*

## Industries with Silica Exposure

- Electronics
- Foundries
- Ceramics, clay & pottery, stone, & glass
- Construction
- Agriculture
- Maritime
- Mining

- Railroad (setting & laying track)
- Slate & flint quarrying & flint crushing
- Use & manufacture of abrasives
- Manufacture of soaps & detergents

## Number of Exposed Workers

- NIOSH *Hazard Alerts *estimate
- > 1,000,000 workers at risk
- > 100,000 sandblasters

## Number of Silica-Related Deaths1

- Total US deaths, 1968-1990, where silicosis reported on death certificate:  13,744
- Deaths where silicosis reported as underlying cause of death:  6,322
- 68% of silica-related deaths reported in 12 states
- 10% of silica-related deaths reported from construction industry
- 					1Study by Bang *et al*., 1995

## Health Effects

- Pulmonary fibrosis (silicosis)
- Possible lung cancer

## Inspection Targeting

- Wherever possible, inspections will be focused to particular establishments where known exposures to crystalline silica have occurred or there are known cases of silicosis
- Process
- Identification of establishments
- Selection of sites by use of random numbers table
- Numbers of inspections determined by Regions
- Sites with effective control programs can be exited after program review

## Examples of Potential Data Sources for Targeting

- Workers’ compensation data
- OSHA 200 data
- SENSOR data (NIOSH cooperative agreements with state agencies)
- State surveillance data
- Hospital discharge data
- OSHA data on industries with historic exposure to crystalline silica

## Additional Information Sources for Construction

- Visual observations of relevant processes
- Dodge reports
- University of Tennessee construction activity reports

## Elements of an Effective, On-going Control Program for Crystalline Silica

- Personal air monitoring
- Medical surveillance
- Training
- Availability of monitoring/surveillance data to workers
- Respiratory protection program
- Hygiene facilities/clothing change areas

## Elements of a Control Program(cont’d)

- Recordkeeping
- Exposures below PEL or abatement program with interim protection
- Housekeeping
- In construction:  a Safety & Health program
- Regulated areas
# Presentation: 860497

## Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry

- Allergenic Products Advisory Committee, April 7, 2005

## Allergenic Products Advisory Committee, April 7, 2005

- Lab overview
- Staffing
- Lot release
- Reference maintenance
- Research/regulatory update
- Cockroach standardization update
- Research activities
- Reclassification of Category IIIA allergenic products
- Critical Path research

## Lab overview

- Staffing
- Lot release
- Reference maintenance

- Principal Investigators
- Jay E. Slater, MD, Lab Chief – Supervisory Medical Officer  (6)
- Ronald Rabin, MD - Senior Staff Fellow (4)
- Post Doctoral Fellows
- Bo Chi, MD - Visiting Associate (3)
- Jinsong Zhang, PhD – (2)
- Nicolette deVore, PhD – Staff Fellow (2)

- Research Technicians
- Mona Febus – Microbiologist (5)
- Marc Alston – Biologist  (4)
- Cherry Valerio – Biologist (4)
- Katia Dobrovolskaia – Biologist (4)

## LIB staffing 1998-2005

## “Routine” regulatory activities

- Lot release
- Reference distribution
- Reference maintenance
- semiannual checks
- replacement

- 417 protocols submitted and reviewed
- Reference distribution
- 2004: 1459 vials in 83 shipments sent to  manufacturers

## Lot release protocols submitted

## Reference distribution
# Presentation: 800467

- Start Cool Down

- Lowpot bus

**Eve and Owl: Power supply test and high energy testing**

- Need ps ready:  Need water.

- Start T&D
- Load files
- Controls

**Day: Kaiser coil & cold lift **

- Tunnel
- Secure

- Condition Seperators, power all devices

- Beam Commission

- uncoalesced

- Attempt
- Shot

- Corrections
- After shot

- helix

- 1. Circ
- 2. Circ
- 3. Acc

- 4. Acc
- 5.Parse
- 6.Parse

- 7.Parse
- 8.Parse
- 9. Helix

- 10.Helix
- 11.Helix
- 12.Helix

- 13. Helix
- 14. Helix
- 15. Helix

- 16.Misc
- 17.Misc
- 18.Misc

- 19. Misc
- 20. Misc
- 21. Misc

- 22.
- 23.
- 24.

- 25.
- 26. Shoot
- 27. Shoot

## Before Beam

- Check out QPM interface to new HTS leads.
- Power and plot correction elements.
- Power main bus and low betas to 1005 GeV.
- Condition Separators.

## Establish Circulating beam (2 shifts)

- Run beam down P1 line with ILAM off (may need D. Johnson)
- Get first turn close while aborting on first turn
- Let beam circulate and get tunes close to nominal (.575 and .585)
- Check BPMs and smooth the orbit
- Adjust tunes, coupling, and chromaticity to nominal
- Aperture scan A0, B0, D0, D17, and E0
- Take BPM data to verify separator polarities

## Accelerate (2 shifts)

- Copy DFGs up the ramp and accelerate.
- Smooth first using only Horz correctors near C0.
- Do more ramp cycles to finish correcting the orbit and setting tunes and coupling.

## Parse Squeeze (3 shifts)

- Parse through the squeeze with separators off correcting orbits, tunes, and coupling (.003 or better)
- Go through the ramp and squeeze cycle to collect all orbits.  If they are not good enough, smooth and repeat
- Go through the ramp and squeeze cycle twice with different radial offsets to measure chromaticities

## Separators on (tune up feed downs)(6 shifts)

- 150 GeV (1 shift)
- Flattop (1 shift)
- Squeeze-parse every 3rd step (2 shifts)
- Ramp and squeeze on both helices to measure tunes on Proton and Pbar orbits.  Make necessary adjustments (2 shifts)

## Misc Activities (6 shifts)

- Do reverse injection tune up 		(1/2 shift)
- Check abort timing 			(1/2 shift)
- Check out instability dampers		(1/2 shift)
- Check out longitudinal dampers	(1/2 shift)
- Verify and calibrate instrumentation	(1 shift   )
- Measure tune and chromaticity drifts after flattop of more than 1 hour				(1 shift   )
- Verify TEL operation			(1/2 shift)
- Collision Helix closure using BPMs  	(1/2 shift)
- Collimator Testing			(1/2 shift)
- 36X0 including Halo removal		(1/2 shift)
# Presentation: 698704

## GTL User Facilities

***Facility II:  ***
***Whole Proteome Analysis***

**Michelle V. Buchanan**

## Genomes to Life User Facilities for 21st Century Biology

**Facility II**** ****Whole Proteome Analysis**
- Measure proteome and metabolites under well-defined conditions
- Gain first insight into function of proteins
- what pathways and processes are present under what conditions
- regulatory network structure and connectivity for individual processes

**Facility II**** **

**Facility I**** **

**Facility IV**** **

**Facility III**** **

## GTL Facility II Whole Proteome Analysis

**GTL Facility II ****Whole Proteome Analysis**

**Key capabilities will include:**
- Growth of organisms under controlled conditions
- High-throughput approaches for sample preparation prior to analysis.
- High throughput techniques for the identification and quantification of proteins, metabolites.
- New computational tools for interpretation and modeling whole proteome data
- Databases and tools for interpreting, archiving, and disseminating data and models to the greater biological community.

## Genome-scale, comprehensive determination of microbial proteomes will require high throughput approaches for sample preparation and analysis

- Novel cell cultivation
- On-line analysis of metabolites
- Robotics and automation
- Chip expression assays

- Microsample handling
- Single cell analysis
- Imaging
- Computation and Informatics

## Deinococcus radiodurans Proteome

**BER pilot project developed MS-based approach for proteome analysis using FTICR and accurate mass tags (AMTs)**
**Permits proteome to be rapidly identified**
**Automated data collection and interpretation**

## Protein  Analysis of Whole Cells on Microfluidic Devices

- J.M. Ramsey, et al

- Note: arrows depict direction of flow.

## Impact of Facility II

**High fidelity data openly accessible to enable scientific studies**
**Economy of scale**
**Critical base information for Facilities III and IV**
- Proteome database
- Models of pathways, processes and regulatory networks
**Empower the general microbiological and biological communities**

## Facility II  Whole Proteome Analysis

- Microbe
- Growth

-    Metabolite
- Analysis

- Protein
-  Processing

- Validation

- Mass
- Spectrometry

- Data
- Interpretation/
- Archival, modeling

-    Facility I
- Reagents

- Facility III
- Complexes

-    Facility IV
- Cellular
- Systems

- Gene Sequence

- High validity data
- resource for
- biological community

**Facility II****  ****Whole Proteome Analysis**
# Presentation: 168177

## Recommendations

- NHII 04
- “Cornerstones for Electronic Healthcare”

## Interoperability Body

- 	The ONCHIT should identify/convene, in partnership with the private sector, an  independent body focused on interoperability with the appropriate authority, funding and support

## Tactical Plan

- 	The interoperability body should translate the strategic framework into a tactical plan with specific, manageable, achievable, and measurable steps.

## Interoperability Tasks

- The interoperability body will promulgate:
- Functional requirements/business processes as defined by end users
- Inter-operability model, standards and architectures
- Testing

## Security and Privacy

- 	The interoperability body should develop and establish infrastructure to facilitate implementation of security and privacy mechanisms

## Reference Implementation

- 	The interoperability body should conduct a reference implementation demonstration project within 12 months that implements:
- Specified use cases (scope)
- Implement and test as defined by the interoperability body
- Conduct a validation of integrity and function by end users

## Patient Identifier

- 	The NCVHS should recommend, within six months, whether a national patient identifier should be used for the NHII.

## LHII Resources

- 	ONCHIT should identify and fund an entity to create educational and start-up resources for LHII early adopters, practices, communities, hospital systems.
- 	Examples of resources include
- Directory of experts/various stakeholders
- RFP templates
- Evaluation criteria
- Sample contract provisions
- Checklist of helpful resources
- Data sources
- Uses and users
- Use cases
# Presentation: 125882

## IRDB “Redesign”

- Trainee Activities PowerView
- May 9, 2002

## Agenda

- Review redesign goals
- PowerView goals and objectives
- Present PV_TRAINEE_ADMIN
- Suggested enhancements to the TA module

## IRDB Redesign Goal

- Make the IRDB the eRA Decision Support System (DSS)
- Give people the information they need
- Make the information useful
- Improve performance
- Minimize the impact of change on the IC

## PowerView Goals and Objectives

- Provide business area centric reporting structures, that
- Facilitate ad-hoc querying and reporting using common tools (e.g., Access, Excel, and Discoverer)
- Provide timely, accurate, and consistent data to current, history, and pubfile records

## IRDB Redesign

- Proposed TA PowerView

## PV_TRAINEE_ADMIN

- Includes all type “T” and “F” records
- National Research Service Award (NRSA) applications and appointments
- Fellowship awards
- Designed primarily for GM and PA staff

## Key Indicators and Dates

- Key indicators
- Appt. status code and descrip. (6)
- Appt. type code (6)
- DSF code (7)
- FOT code and descrip. (7)
- Payback status code (8)
- Termination status code (10)
- WIP status code (10)

- Key dates
- Activation date, type 1 and 2 “Fs” (6)
- Project start and end dates (8)
- Support limit waiver approval date (9)
- Trainee appointment start and end dates (9)
- Termination date (10)

## Budget and People Data

- Funding data
- Stipend level (9)
- Stipend amount (9)
- Total stipend amount (10)
- Travel amount (10)
- Tuition amount  (10)

- Person Data
- Full name
- Person ID (8)
- Person profile ID (8)
- Person invol. ID (8)
- Person type code (8)
- Role type code (8)
- Stipend level degree code (9)

## Admin Data

- Admin data
**Appl ID (6)*
**Source_code_dc (6)*
**Appointment num (6)*
- Activity code (6)
- Admin. IC (6)
- Appl. Type code (6)
- External org ID (7)
- FY (7)
- Full grant number (7)

- Admin data cont’d.
- Major activity code (7)
- Org Name (8)
- Project title (8)
- Serial Number (9)
- Suffix code (9)
- Support waiver limit code (9)

- * = Primary Key

## TA module enhancements!?

- Track more than one degree
- Track trainee after leaving NIH
- Training discipline
- Support once training stops
- Project description

- Department, program, and major component names
- Prior NRSA support
- Prior non-NRSA support
- Trainee institution name
# Presentation: 483894

## HOx isotopes

- Jason M. St. Clair, Thomas F. Hanisco, James G. Anderson

- AVE_WIIF Meeting
- 9/20/05

**ICOS: E. Moyer, F. N. Keutsch, D. S. Sayres**
**Harvard Water: E. M. Weinstock, J. R. Spackman, J. Smith**
**JPL Water: R. Herman, R. Troy**

## Photolysis-LIF Method

- <date/time>

**HOx isotopes:**
**Photolysis - Fluorescence detection of HDO/H****2****O**

- H2O + *hv*  H + OH  HDO + *hv*  H + OD
*hv* = 8W
*** *= 172 nm

- Excimer Lamp Photolysis

- OH, OD LIF
** = 287 nm

## Unique attributes of HOxotope

- Wall-less detection zone
- Zero background measurement
- Sample flush time ~150 ms
- Empirical time constant < 1 s
- Detection technique unique among isotope instruments
-  Valuable for intercomparison

## Calibration

- Isotopes provide unique challenges.
- Currently: 5% uncertainty in the calibration.
- Addition of in-flight calibration: lowers to 3%.
- Sensitivity in-flight is measured every 10 s.

## Performance on 7/3/2005

## Harvard Water and Hoxotope agree

- HOx H2O ~ HWV 5%   calibration is good

## HOx and Harvard Water time series

- Issues to address
- Contamination
- S/N

## Contamination on ascent

- ICOS and HOx see the same contamination, implying a similar source
-  Fuselage source
-  Change inlet/air sampled

## Atypical laser performance

- Will not be a problem for future flights.
- Poor thermal regulation of the pump diodes caused their output to drift in frequency.
- Low laser power resulted in decreased signal-to-noise.

- Optimal pump wavelength

- Temperature
- effect

## S/N: why future data will look even better

- HDO: S/N for fluorescence  square root of laser power.
- D: S/N scales directly with laser power.

- S/N > 30 for HDO typical
- Factor of 10 better in D S/N
- 	10 per mil

## Summary

- Flight data high points:
- Excellent agreement
- HOx water agrees with water from HWV 5%
- HOx HDO agrees with ICOS HDO
- Hoxotope measured HDO with S/N ~7 at 5 ppm H2O
- Thanks to NASA IIP, NASA WB57, Harvard Engineering

## Slide 12

## Slide 13

## Laboratory Time Constant

## D profile on 7/3/05

- Mean 1 for  >375

- 1 w/ typical laser performace

## Motivation I: Water isotopes are valuable in situ tracers

- HDO condenses more readily than H2O
- Rainout leads to HDO depletion
- Ice injection can make the stratosphere “Heavy”
*In situ* water isotope measurements can offer a tracer for the condensation history of air parcels

## Data acquisition  

- OD and OH lines are scanned alternately (4 s) with background (2 s)
- OD and OH line positions are determined from real-time fits
-  Post flight analysis:
- Least squares fit of each line to get [OD] and [OH]
- Multiply by cal factor to get [HDO] and [H2O]
# Presentation: 383285

## CRS Errors

| error | brahms | phenix | phobos | star |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hpss_busy | 296 | 1436 | 304 | 2151 |
| Pftp_get_failed | 21 | 222 | 93 | 141 |
| Hpss_export_failed | 0 | 425 | 30 | 257 |
| Hpss_error_-32 | 4 | 69 | 0 | 0 |
| Hpss_error_-5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 40 |
| Hpss_error_-46 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 53 |
| Hpss_error_70 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 |

## Hpss busy,hpss_error_*

- Those errors are returned by ORBS
- CRS only reports the error numbers

## Pftp_get_failed

- Failed to import raw data from the cache.
- Two scenarios are possible: pftp sesion starts, the remota fileopens a local copy with size 0 on local disk, ten nothing happens and the transfer is frozen.
- Second scenario: transfer starts, some data arrives on local disk, then the transfer is frozen and times out.

## Hpss_export_failed

- Failed to export data do DST cache.
- Usually the symptoms are: job has to export a number of output files. All files export ok, but one. During the transfer of that file pftp reports I/O error (I have no idea what it means) and this file arrives corrupted. Consequently the entire transfer is considered bad.
- This error can be corrected by repeating the transfer at later time, however it would be good to understand what causes the i/o erorrs while executing the pftp put.
# Presentation: 780258

## Finding AMAG Software Version

- From client go to Help menu > About.
- In About you will find software versions number.
- Note older systems my look different.

## Finding AMAG Hardware Version

- From client go to Tools menu > Node Status

## Finding AMAG Hardware Version

- Click on Find button >

## Finding AMAG Hardware Version

- Highlight one or all of the nodes you want to check.
- Click on Open >

## Finding AMAG Hardware Version

- Each node will show Node Name, Current Version of each Door Controller connected, and Current Status.

## HSE Compliant Versions

- Minimum Software Version is 5.0.1 HSE
- Current version is 6.1
- Controller hardware required is M2000 or M2100 series controllers.
- DBU Version = 3.0
- 4DC Version = 3.3
- 2DC Version = 2.1
- AMAG readers which read PIV II cards are 843 and 853 with latest flash V1P17.mot

## Migration

- Software can be updated to latest version.
- Software required to be under software support agreement.
- M2000 and M2100 series controllers are field flashable to current version.
- 843 and 853 readers are field flashable to current version.

## Compliant system requirements

- Software version 5.0.1HSE or higher.
- M2000 or M2100 Series controllers running current version.
- 843 or 853 series readers running version V1P19.mot
- Our 844 reader is GSA APL approved and can also be used on new installations or as replacement readers.

## Required information for quoting software upgrade

- On the back of the server is a dongle, similar to a USB thumb drive.
- On the dongle you will find a system serial number, this number is required for dealers to quote support agreements.
- Note, dongle on older systems my be connected to COMM port.
# Presentation: 843952

## Charged Fullerenes as High-Capacity Hydrogen Storage Media

- Using first-principles calculations within density functional theory, we explore systematically the capacity of charged carbon fullerenes C*n* (20≤*n*≤82) as hydrogen storage media [1]. We find that the binding strength of molecular hydrogen on either positively or negatively charged fullerenes can be dramatically enhanced to 0.18-0.32 eV, a desirable range for potential room-temperature, near ambient applications.  The enhanced binding is delocalized in nature, surrounding the whole surface of a charged fullerene, and is attributed to the polarization of the hydrogen molecules by the high electric field generated near the surface of the charged fullerene. At full hydrogen coverage, these charged fullerenes can gain storage capacities of up to ~8.0 wt%. We also find that, contrary to intuitive expectation, fullerenes containing encapsulated metal atoms only exhibit negligible enhancement in the hydrogen binding strength, because the charge donated by the metal atoms is primarily confined inside the fullerene cages. These predictions may prove to be instrumental in searching for a new class of high capacity hydrogen storage media.
- [1] Mina Yoon, Shenyuan Yang, Enge Wang, and Zhenyu Zhang, Nano Lett. **7**, 2578 (2007).

*Mian Yoon,**1,2** Shenyuan Yang,**3,2** Enge Wang,**3** Zhenyu Zhang**1,2*
- 1Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- 3International Center for Quantum Structures and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China

## Figure 1. (a) Binding energy of molecular hydrogen on charged or neutral fullerenes. The DFT calculations (data points) are compared with semi-classical calculations (solid lines), and for both cases the binding energy increases quadratically with the net charge.  (b-c) Structurally optimized hydrogen-fullerene complexes of (b) 12H2-C283+ and (c) 43H2-C826+, with a hydrogen uptake of 6.67 wt% and 8.04 wt%, respectively. 

**Figure 1. **(a) Binding energy of molecular hydrogen on charged or neutral fullerenes. The DFT calculations (data points) are compared with semi-classical calculations (solid lines), and for both cases the binding energy increases quadratically with the net charge.  (b-c) Structurally optimized hydrogen-fullerene complexes of (b) 12H2-C283+ and (c) 43H2-C826+, with a hydrogen uptake of 6*.*67 wt% and 8.04 wt%, respectively.

**Figure 2. **(a) Electric fields associated with neutral and charged fullerenes, C28*q* (*q*=2+,0,2-), at the center of a hydrogen molecule located on top of a hexagonal ring.  (b-c) Charge density variations of a hydrogen molecule induced by an electric field of 2×1010V/m applied (b) parallel and (c) perpendicular to the molecule axis, respectively.
# Presentation: 704161

## Week of July 29 to August 5 D0 Summary

- Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency
- Delivered: 2.1pb-1
- Live: 1.1pb-1 (~53%)
- Major reasons for observed efficiency numbers
- better
- speed up of Level 2 trigger (less monitoring, faster program)
- front-end-busy is down to ~4%
- no major hardware/software problems
- special runs
- muon
- DAQ tests
- worse
- muon readout code crashes
- up to 300 errors per shift
- related to Level 2 code speedup and new trigger version 8.0
- attacking problem in 3 ways
- minimizing number of front ends in readout
- analyzing dumps for failed events
- bringing expert back from vacations
- Beam halo rates are stable

- Dmitri Denisov

## Beam Position

**Beam Position**

- Beam position is stable since July 20th jump. Numbers for correction of beam
- location are agreed upon with BD. To be corrected on 08.06.02.

- Dmitri Denisov

## D0 Detectors Status

- Luminosity detector
- Stable operation
- Silicon detector
- Power supplies are running well
- Noises stable
- Rad. doses estimated
- Calorimeter
- Stable
- Calibration of Level 1 trigger energy scale
- Optimization of readout zero suppression cut
- Muon
- single major problem - readout code crashes
- VME LVPS failures analysis
- Forward proton detector
- inserting pots during most stores
- would like to be notified every time CDF pots are moved in
- increase in D0 pots counting rates are observed

- Dmitri Denisov

## SMT Radiation Dose

- Dose estimate is based on “finger counters”
- diodes located inside silicon detector volume
- calibrated using mip response and TLD badges
- For inner silicon layer located at ~3cm from beam axis
- dose per pb-1
-  0.4-0.6 krad
- total for ~70pb-1 delivered
- ~35 krad from collisions
- ~3 krad from shot setups
- total dose
- ~40krad (~6 krad at radius of 8cm)
- For expected Run IIa luminosity of ~3fb-1
- ~1.5Mrad expected (at 3cm)
- reasonable number as D0 silicon can handle 1+ Mrad

- Dmitri Denisov

## Muon LVPS Failures

- There are 44 VME crates used to readout muon detectors located in different locations in the collision hall
- We observed rare, but steady failures of LVPS in the muon crates
- about once a month
- requires ~2 hours access to replace failed supply
- usually wipes ~25% of muon coverage for the store LVPS failed

- Dmitri Denisov

## The Mysterious Corner

- FSC SCW – 3 times

- MDT SBWT – 2 times

- MDT SCWB – 3 times

- * All failures concentrated in one corner (!?)
- * Nothing specific in terms of temperature, humidity, etc.
- * Failure rate is at least ~5 higher then Vicor expectations.
- * While higher does are not expected in this area, TLD badges
-    have been installed.

- Dmitri Denisov

## Summary

- D0 detector is progressing with physics data taking
- no major problems with detectors
- trigger list 8.00 is running on-line well
- muon readout crashes issue is been addressed by experts
- Silicon detector radiation doses look reasonable for Run IIa goals
- Muon VME crates LVPS failures are under constant monitoring/investigation
- Expecting beam position adjustment on Tuesday, August 6
- No access requests as of today

- Dmitri Denisov
# Presentation: 866923

##  Update of the PD Layout

***P.N. Ostroumov***
*December 15, 2005*

## Linac Sections

**IS LEBT**
**RFQ **
- Higher current,  45 mA
- Design completed
**MEBT**
- Long drift space for the chopper
**RT-CH**
- 12 cavities
- Focusing period 51.5 cm to 75 cm
**SSR**
- new fields, cryostat layout, revised # of cavities, peak field
**DSR**
- New fields, cryostat layout
**TSR**
- New fields, cryostats, matching to RB-TESLA
**RB-TESLA**
- Cryostat layout, quads
**TESLA**
- Cryostat layout, quads

## RFQ

***RFQ***

| Average radius R0, cm | 0.340 |
| --- | --- |
| Vane curvature radius Re, cm | 0.255 |
| Voltage Ul, kV | 90.45 |
| Length   (cm) | 302.71951 |
| Modulation factor | 1 – 1.98 |
| Synchronous phase, degree | -90,  -30 |
| Transverse phase advance, 0/45mA, degree | 45/32 |
| Transverse acceptance norm.,  cm mrad | 0.289 |
| Peak surface field, kV/cm | 330 |
| Peak surface field, Kilpatrick units | 1.8 |

## RFQ parameters

|  | 2 term | 8 term |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Output energy, MeV/u | 2.4936 | 2.4934 |
| Transverse emittance, 4 rms, in/out,  cm mrad  | 0.100/0.103 | 0.100/0.107 |
| Transverse emittance, 99.5%, in/out,  cm mrad  | 0.140/0.209 | 0.140/0.213 |
| Long. emittance, 4 rms,  keV/u nsec | 4.61 | 4.41 |
| Long. emittance, 99.5%, keV/u nsec | 13.81 | 13.76 |
| Acceleration efficiency, % | 96.7 | 96.5 |
| Particle losses inside the RFQ, % | 1.3 | 1.8 |

## Phase Space Plots at the RFQ end

*Phase Space Plots at the RFQ end*

**Longitudinal**

**Transverse**

- Emittance (keV/u nsec)

- 1-N/N0

- 1-N/N0

- Emittance ( cm mrad)

- Phase (deg)

- dW/W (%)

- X (cm)

- dX/X (mrad)

## MEBT

- 23     25.5      26.5                  98                         26.5    25.5           45

- Distance between the center of elements (cm)

- External surface of the RFQ end wall      Space for the chopper          First accelerating CH-type 						      cavity
- 							This solenoid belongs to the
- 							first accelerating period

- S=solenoid; B=buncher; C=cavity

- S

- B

- C

- B

- S

- S

- S

- S

## RT-CH

|  | Energy[MeV/u] | Voltage | Synch.phase | Lperiod(m) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 2.54672 | 0.0000 |  |  |
| 1 | 2.72101 | 0.2463 | -45 | 0.515 |
| 2 | 2.99129 | 0.3695 | -43 | 0.554 |
| 3 | 3.33936 | 0.4611 | -41 | 0.574 |
| 4 | 3.73797 | 0.5128 | -39 | 0.593 |
| 5 | 4.20864 | 0.5892 | -37 | 0.613 |
| 6 | 4.74839 | 0.6587 | -35 | 0.633 |
| 7 | 5.38224 | 0.7556 | -33 | 0.652 |
| 8 | 6.10965 | 0.8484 | -31 | 0.672 |
| 9 | 6.9451 | 0.9645 | -30 | 0.691 |
| 10 | 7.84642 | 1.0404 | -30 | 0.711 |
| 11 | 8.84379 | 1.1513 | -30 | 0.730 |
| 12 | 9.9074 | 1.2278 | -30 | 0.750 |
|  |  |  |  | 7.688 |

## RT-CH

## RT-CH

***RT-CH***

**Aperture**
**WS**

## SSR

## SSR

## DSR

## DSR

## TSR

## Mismatch due to inter-cryo spaces

## TSR

## RB-TESLA

## RB-TESLA

## TESLA-I

## TESLA-I

## TESLA-II

## TESLA-II

## TESLA-II

## PD linac

## End-to-End Beam Dynamics, 20K

## Emittance growth
# Presentation: 701320

## Recent Trends in Exploration Results and the Implication for Future Petroleum Liquids Supply Michael Rodgers, Senior Director Upstream GroupApril, 2005

## Key Messages

***Given a continuation of recent trends in exploration results (field sizes, success rates, etc. and recovery factors): ***

## Key Messages

## Methodology

## The Message

## The Problem - The Expected Growing Gap Between Global Demand and Global Non-OPEC Supply in the Next Decade

## Non-OPEC Countries that are Either in Decline or Currently in a Plateau

**The above bars show the onset and duration of documented production peaks or plateaus – *****tracking country life cycle shows an acceleration of the number of countries passing from peak to decline***

## Countries Growing Production Versus Countries Declining

## Egypt – A Typical Life Cycle for an Oil Producing Country

## Egypt – A Typical Life Cycle for an Oil Producing Country

## Non-OPEC Countries that are in Decline

## Non-OPEC Countries that are in Plateau

## Non-OPEC Non-FSUCountries with Production Growth Profiles

## Historical Non OPEC Crude Production (Excluding FSU, Natural Gas Liquids and Canadian Oil Sands)

## Historical Non OPEC Crude Production (Excluding FSU, Natural Gas Liquids and Canadian Oil Sands)

## Annual Non OPEC Crude Production Balance (Excluding FSU, USA, and Canada)

## Non OPEC Crude Oil Forecast with an Exploration Component (Excluding Natural Gas Liquids, FSU, and Canadian Oil Sands)

## Historical Crude Production (Excluding Natural Gas Liquids and Canadian Oil Sands)

## Non OPEC Crude Oil and NGL Production Forecast with an Exploration Component (includes Canadian Oil Sands)

## Non OPEC Annual Crude Oil Production Balance (Excluding USA, Canada, and Canadian Oil Sands)

## A Comparison of Reserves Discovered Versus Reserves Produced Since 1990

## Significant Percentages of Regional Reserve Bases Were Produced Post 1990

## The Problem - The Expected Growing Gap Between Global Demand and Global Non-OPEC Supply in the Next Decade

## Concluding Comments

## The Choices

## Offices 

- 1300 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 800
- Washington, DC 20036 USA
- Tel:   (1 202) 872 1199   Fax:  (1 202) 872 1219
- 3, cité Paradis
- 75010 Paris, France
- Tel:  (33 1) 47 70 29 00  Fax: (33 1) 47 70 27 37
- Houston, Texas
- Tel: (1 281) 599 7099  Fax: (1 281) 599 9891
- London, United Kingdom
- Tel: 44 (0)1256 760678Fax: 44 (0)1256 760678
- info@pfcenergy.com                              www.pfcenergy.com
# Presentation: 082769

## Training the Generations

- Shelly Havlovick

## Tailoring ERO Training Program

- Understand the four different generations in the work force
- Remember — One size doesn’t fit all
- Recognize the audience
- Develop or enhance ERO training program using a team approach

## Radio Babies/Traditionalists

- Born between 1930 and 1945
- Grew up with on-the-job training style
- Are very loyal to the company
- Could not afford to attend class
- Many have high school diplomas
- Considered classroom training special

## Baby Boomers

- Born between 1946 and 1964
- Represent largest group in work force
- Enjoy working in groups
- Enjoy socializing
- Enjoy role playing
- Thrive on feedback and recognition from peers

## Gen Xers

- Born between 1965 and 1976
- Represent smallest group in work force
- Are very independent
- Are techno-savvy
- Expect to start on time/end on time
- Expect more than one answer

## Gen Yers or Millennials

- Born between 1977 and 1991
- Have always had technology
- Concerned with safety
- Enjoy diversity
- Have ability to multitask
- Are globally minded

## Radio Babies/Traditionalists

- Show up early
- Respect the trainer/teacher
- Tolerate long hours
- Expect training to be aligned with company’s bottom line
- Enjoy real-world case studies
- Are decision-makers in the ERO

## Baby Boomers

- Like to know what the “big picture” effect is for the company
- Expect to hear objectives that align with their organization’s objectives and goals
- Like to give feedback on training
- Stay sharp to stay ahead
- Are decision-makers in the ERO

## Gen Xers

- Do not respect the trainer/teacher
- Expect the trainer/teacher to be a resident expert on the topic
- Like training that is transferable
- Do not like to be interrupted
- Like the trainer/teacher to maintain eye contact with all trainees
- Expect trainer/teacher to ask follow-up questions on their comments/inquiries
- Are support personnel in the ERO

## Gen Yers or Millennials

- Never early/mostly late
- Respond best to technology-driven training and a variety of teaching methods
- Want trainers to be causal and laid back
- Expect conversations, not lectures
- Need instant feedback and recognition for participation
- Are support or technician personnelin the ERO

## Age Diverse Teams

- Traditionalists have the experience
- Gen Xers and Yers bring energy and fresh ideas
- Boomers bridge the gap between the past and future
- All generations can provide valuable feedback to enhance the ERO training program

## Summary

- Effective training
- Use a variety of teaching methods
- Treat trainees with respect
- Design training for interaction
- Include fun activities
- Team approach is very effective
# Presentation: 532429

## Informed Consent

**Schizophrenia / Bipolar Studies**
**Patient Consent Only:****	**** ****	****	****	****98.5%**
**Legal Representative Only:****	****	****	****0%**
**Both Patient and Legal Representative****	****1.5%**
**Dementia Study**
**Patient Consent Only****	****	****	****	****49%****	**
**Legal Representative Only****	****	****	****41%**
**Both Patient and Legal Representative ****	****10%**

**4614.01**

## Efficacy Measures: Schizophrenia Dose Mean Change from Baseline to 2 hours (LOCF)

**4058.03**

*** p<0.05 vs placebo**

## Vital Signs: Presence / Absence of Dose-Response RelationshipMean Change from Baseline to 2 hours - Schizophrenia Dose

**4408.01**

**No linear, quadratic, or cubic relationship between the doses (2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg) of Olanzapine**

## Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale: Schizophrenia Dose Scores at 2 hours after first IM injection

**IMOlz2.5**

**IMOlz5.0**

**IMOlz7.5**

**IMOlz10**

**IMHal7.5**

**IMPla**

**4034.03**

**Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale: Schizophrenia Dose ****Scores at 2 hours after first IM injection**

## Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale

**4169.04**

**1. Marked Agitation**
**2. Moderate Agitation**
**3. Mild Agitation**
**4. Normal**
**5. Mild Calmness**
**6. Moderate Calmness**
**7. Marked Calmness**
**8. Deep Sleep**
**9. Unarousable**

**High levels of physical activity;**
- markedly increased levels of verbal expression; may be physically violent; cannot control signs of agitation if requested to do so; may require continuous supervision and / or physical restraint

**Normal levels of physical activity;**  normal levels of verbal expression; awake with eyes continuously open

**Sleeping deeply;**  cannot be aroused by vigorous verbal or physical stimulation

**Sleeping lightly;****  **aroused by mild to moderate verbal or physical stimulation;  greatly reduced verbal or physical activity

**Notes:**
The Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES):

  The Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES) is a single item 9-point scale which was developed by Lilly to differentiate between the agitated, calm, and sleep states of patients.  This scale was designed to ensure that levels of sedation were carefully monitored, and to ascertain to what degree reductions in agitation were a function of excessive sedation. 

  No olanzapine-treated patients scored a 9.  Only 1 patient (a lorazepam-treated patient in HGHW) scored a 9.  

## Dementia Diagnosis BreakdownDementia Study

**Dementia Subtype (N=272)**
**Alzheimer's:****	****59.9% (n=163)**
**Vascular:  ****	****	****22.4% (n=61)**
**Mixed: ****	****	****17.6% (n=48)**

**4619.01**

## Concomitant Medications NOT Allowed: Dementia Study

**4434.02**

**Guanethidine**
**Methyldopa**
**Reserpine**
**Neuroleptics**
**Benzodiazepines**
**Anticonvulsants**
**Antidepressants**
**Lithium****	**

**Psychostimulants**
**Other Psychotropic Drugs**
**Amantadine**
**Anti-Parkinsonian Drugs**
**Anorexics **
**Antiemetics**
**Cough and Cold Preparations****1**

**1****With the exception of loratadine (Claritin)**
# Presentation: 525461

## Water Issues in the Tucson RegionCongresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ Town Hall on WaterSahuarita, Arizona    July 1, 2008

**Sharon B. Megdal, Ph.D.**
**Director, Water Resources Research Center**
**Director, Water Sustainability Program**
**C.W. & Modene Neely Endowed Professor**
**smegdal@cals.arizona.edu**
**www.cals.arizona.edu**

## Water Resources Research Center

- WRRC Mission
***The University of Arizona's Water Resources Research Center (WRRC) promotes understanding of critical state and regional water management and policy issues through research, community outreach and public education.***
- The WRRC is committed to:
- assisting communities in water management and policy;
- educating teachers, students and the public about water; and
- encouraging scientific research on state water issues.

## We do this in a variety of ways...

- Publications
- Conferences, seminars, and other gatherings
- Web Site  ****www.cals.arizona.edu/azwater/****
- Real-world research
- Educational and outreach programs
- Part of university-wide Water Sustainability Program, which funds research, including applied research, education and outreach.  We try to work with partners on our projects.

## Slide 4

## Mapping and Decision Support Tools

## Slide 6

## Focus on Water Management and Policy: Water Regulations—Location, Location, Location!

## Some Current/Recent Projects

- Recharge as a Tool for Meeting Water Policy Objectives
- Evaluation of Department of Water Resources Management Plans for the AMAs
- Water Resource Availability for the Tucson Region
- Regional Water Planning Perspectives Study
- Cochise County Water Use Study of domestic wells
- Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD)
- Conserve to Enhance
- Redoing our Water Map poster
- Arroyo Publication on water re-use
- Other

## Partial List of Issues and Challenges

- Drought
- Unknowns related to climate change
- Shortages on the Colorado
- Growth
- Use of effluent for potable and other water needs – the next major new water source
- Access to and utilization of renewable supplies
- Interstate and international water issues
- The surface water/groundwater interface
- Riparian areas and other environmental considerations related to water
- Pricing
- The role of Conservation
- Water and Energy
- Etc.

## We are a resource...

- Part of Arizona Cooperative Extension
- We endeavor to be accessible
- www.cals.arizona.edu/azwater
- smegdal@cals.arizona.edu

- When the well’s dry, we know the worth of water. *Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanac, 1746*

- The frog does not drink up the pond in which he lives. *American Indian Proverb*
# Presentation: 675976

## Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Women With HER‐2 Overexpressing Node-Positive Breast Cancer

- Breast Intergroup (N9831)
- Edith A. Perez, PI

## N9831:  Intergroup Trial for Node , HER2  Breast Cancer

- 				Paclitaxel qw x 12
**      ****AC q3w x 4**		Paclitaxel qw x 12    H qw x 52
- 				(Paclitaxel + H) qw x 12  H qw x 40

**H= trastuzumab                              n= 3000     **

**RT/Tam**

**PI:  Perez EA.  NCCTG**

## Her2 Eligibility Criteria for N9831 as Determined by Local Testing

- HercepTest = 3+
- Other IHC test = >33% strongly positive (3+)
- Vysis FISH = Her2:Cen17 > 2.0
- Oncor FISH = >5 copies Her2 gene

## Her2 Central Testing

- Confirmatory central testing of first 100 patients by HercepTest and Vysis FISH
- If >20% discrepancy between local and central Her2 status, then modify eligibility based on local results

## N9831: HER2 TestingResults

- Results of central testing for 119 patients
- Local testing methods (65 labs) included:
- 50% (59/119) HercepTest
- 43% (51/119) other IHC tests
-   7% (9/119) FISH

## Comparison of Local/Central IHC Review

- 74% (81/110) 3+ local IHC and 3+ central HercepTest
-  75% (44/59) with 3+ by local 	HercepTest had 3+ by central 	HercepTest
- 72% (37/51) with 3+ by other IHC had 3+ by central HercepTest

## Comparison of Local/Central FISH Review

- 77% (7/9) with Her2 amp by local FISH had 3+ by central HercepTest
- 67% (6/9) with Her2 amp by local FISH had amplification by central FISH

## HercepTest/FISH Central Review of 119 Specimens

- 66% (79/119) amp by central FISH
- 74% (88/119)  3+ by central IHC
- 10% (9/88) were 3+ by central IHC and not amplified by central FISH

## Comparison of Central HercepTest and Vysis FISH

##  Summary of Central HercepTest and Vysis FISH Results

- 90% (79/88) specimens 3+ on central HercepTest were amplified by central FISH
- 100% (31/31) specimens 0,1+, 2+ on central HercepTest were not amplified by central FISH
- 92% (110/119) concordance for central IHC and central FISH

## Proposed Modifications for N9831

- Register on trial if node-positive and 3+ IHC or Her2 amplified by local testing
- Prior to completion of AC, central testing of specimen performed
- If 3+ or amplified, randomize to 1 of 3 treatment arms
- If not 3+ or amplified, cancel from study