<!-- Title: 17:14:45  Thu Feb 14 2002 -->
<!-- Crewchief: Shin-Shan Yu -->
<!-- Op1: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Op2: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Op3: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Op4: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Op5: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Op6: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Notes: -->
<pre>Cot Validation: good runs started from Valentine's Day :)</pre>


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 17:20:43 2002 -->
Originally there were about 5 runs marked as good runs by the  
shift crew (with big luminosity > 10/nb) . Later they were  
unmarked by  Jonnathan Lewis since they were testing XTRP  
firmware and found it wrong. So there is only one good run so far. --> run 139115  
 
 Here is the list of hot and cold cells. Almost the same as last 
week, except that some of the hot cells in SL8 were OK. 
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
  
<table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="100%" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>Superlayer</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center> Hot/Warm Cells</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Cold/Dead Cells</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>1</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center> none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>2</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>47, 75</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>3</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>143</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>95</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>228</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>5</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none </center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>166</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>6</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>166, 271, 369</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>7</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>191, 192</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>8</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>34, 42, 139, 149, 150, 154, 206, 260,  263, 264, 276, 373</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>446</center> 
 
<br> </td> 
</tr> 
</table> 
 
</body> 
</html> 
  
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->
<!-- Comment: Thu Feb 14 17;26;16 comment by...Shin-Shan Yu -->
<pre>Sorry it's 139155. typo, but the table is still correct.</pre>


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 17:40:37 2002 -->
<pre>I am also comparing 139155 and 138860. But since 139155 has much 
lower statistics (~4.95 /nb), I can't use 'Used Hits vs Cells' 
plot to judge if there's any change. There are many fluctuations 
in each superlayer.  
 
The dip in SL1 is still there and there's also a dip in SL2 0-40 
which seems less serious in 138860. Their global mean residuals, 
track parameters quite agree with each other. </pre>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 17:53:46 2002 -->
Here is a table of cells with low or high residuals. Except 
SL7 151, 259 (~-110 um), SL8 160 (~108 um), 364 (-130 um) are  
the new cells, all the others are the consistent as last week. 
 
 
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
  
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="80%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>Superlayer</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Cells with high residual</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Cells with low residual</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr NOSAVE> 
<td NOSAVE> 
<center>1</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>2</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>1-4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>3</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>1-4</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>1, 2, 4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>5</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>1-4, 166</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>6</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>7</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>151, 259</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>8</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>160</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>1, 364</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
</body> 
</html>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 18:00:24 2002 -->
Here is a table of cells with low or high residuals. Except 
SL7 151, 259 (~-110 um), SL8 160 (~108 um), 364 (-130 um) are  
the new cells, all the others are the consistent as last week. 
 
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
  
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="80%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr NOSAVE> 
<td NOSAVE>Superlayer</td> 
 
<td>Cells with high residual</td> 
 
<td>Cells with low residual</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>1</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>2</td> 
 
<td>1, 2, 3, 4</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>3</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>1, 2, 3, 4</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>4</td> 
 
<td>1, 2, 4</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>5</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>1, 2, 3, 4, 166</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>6</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>7</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>151, 259</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>8</td> 
 
<td>160</td> 
 
<td>1, 364</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
</body> 
</html>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 22:45:39 2002 -->
<pre>One thing I forgot to mention is that run 139155's residual has 
a dip when drift distance is close to zero.  In run 138860. the 
residul is about 0 at this region, but in run 139155, the residul 
is around -200 um. Also SL1 and SL2 have 20 um lower residuals  
globally than run 138860. SL7 has 20 um higher residuals than  
run 138860. </pre>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 22:51:53 2002 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/cot/Thu_Feb_14_2002_225142.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=cot&action=view&page=-31  align='top'></td><td>Red is run 138860 and black is run 139155. Notice SL1, SL2, SL7 have residuals quite off from 0, and the residuals of all superlayers near drift distance 0 are all around -200um.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Thu Feb 14 23:03:48 2002 -->
<pre>Good Run 139177: 
 
There's several additional hot cells SL6-10, SL7-160, SL8-156,  
SL8-280, while SL7-192, SL8-373 are gone.  
 
There are several cells with low or high residuals are gone: 
SL8-160,364, SL7-151,259. 
 
Also for all the superlayers, there's no 20 um global shift from 
0. But still there's a dip at drift distance near 0. The dip is 
~-200 um.</pre>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Fri Feb 15 15:05:22 2002 -->
<pre>Three good runs:  
139206 (100.849 nb-1) 
139207 (42.733 nb-1) 
139209 (21.640 nb-1) 
 
Compare 139206 with 138860, no big difference except that the 
cells with low residuals in SL7 are OK now and still there's a 
dip of residual ~-200 um near drift distance =0. 
 
139207 and 139209 also looked OK except that SL3 cell 153-160 are dead which is due to a dead TDC in b0cot06, slot 09 as described in shift crew e-log. </pre>
<!-- Author: Eiko -->


<!-- Date: Fri Feb 15 16:20:40 2002 -->
<pre>Did a quick check for run 139217 (~2 nb-1). The dead cells 
in SL3 are gone because TDC slot 9 is fixed by Kirby. </pre>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Fri Feb 15 19:45:21 2002 -->
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
  
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="100%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>Superlayer</center> 
</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with High Occupancy</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with Low Occupancy</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>1</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>64-10</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>2</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>46-11</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>30-7, 158-0</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>3</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>32-5, 92-5, 93-11, 126-0, 212-9</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>227-0,2 ~5, 8, 254-7</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>5</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>161-11,  209-1, 264-8</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>6</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>69-11, 345-11,  359-11</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>7</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>8-8, 51-3, 101-10, 286-1, 342-2, 370-11</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>8</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
My first trial of using YMon to look for low occupancy wires. The list in SL8 is not finished. 
<td> 
<center>17-9, 19-5,  40-8,  59-1, 65-8,  72-11, 75-4, 75-6, 
85-11....</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
</body> 
</html>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Sun Feb 17 22:04:49 2002 -->
There are 11 good runs during the weekend. 
<br> 
<br>Run 139217, 2.618 nb-1 
<br>Run 139248, 28.688 nb-1 
<br>Run 139253, 126.664 nb-1 
<br>Run 139277, 190.238 nb-1 
<br>Run 139278, 83.179 nb-1 
<br>Run 139295, 76.436 nb-1 
<br>Run 139296, 18.474 nb-1 
<br>Run 139298, 29.182 nb-1 
<br>Run 139299, 38.061 nb-1 
<br>Run 139300, 24.518 nb-1 
<br>Run 139302, 7.810 nb-1 
<br><br> 
 
Here is an updated list of hot/cold cells.  
<br> 
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="80%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>Superlayer</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Hot/Warm Cells</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Dead/Cold Cells</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>1</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>2</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>47, 75 </center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>3</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>143</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>4</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>95</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>228</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>5</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>18</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>166</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>6</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>166, 271, 369</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>7</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>123, 160, 191</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>none</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>8</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>34, 42, 139, 149, 150, 154, 156, 206, 260,  263, 264, 276,  
(280), 373, (388)</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>446</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
</body> 
</html> 
<br> 
 
As for the low/high residuals, Superlayer 8, cell 2 is the only  
additional cell with high residual. 
<br> 
 
 I compare 139277 with the big run two days ago 139206, found no 
difference. Then I compare the big runs on the weekend with 139277, 139253 SL8's residual vs drift distance plot shows in 
gerneral, its residual is about 15 um larger than run 139277.
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Sun Feb 17 22:44:26 2002 -->
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
  
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="100%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td>Superlayer</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with High Occupancy</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with Low Occupancy</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>1</td> 
 
<td>103-6, 119-0</td> 
 
<td>64-10, 106-11</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>2</td> 
 
<td>46-11, 74-5</td> 
 
<td>30-7, 105-11, 158-0</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>3</td> 
 
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
YMon Low/High Occupancy Cells based on run 139277 , only weird cell is 
SL4-227 whose wire 0,2-5 are all 
<br>dead or cold. 
<br>  
<center><table BORDER COLS=3 WIDTH="100%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td>Superlayer</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with High Occupancy</td> 
 
<td>Cell-Wire with Low Occupancy</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>1</td> 
 
<td>103-6, 119-0</td> 
 
<td>64-10, 106-11</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>2</td> 
 
<td>46-11, 74-5</td> 
 
<td>30-7, 105-11, 158-0</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>3</td> 
 
<td>62-1, 170-0, 170-1</td> 
 
<td>32-5, 92-5, 93-11, 126-0, 126-1, 212-9</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>4</td> 
 
<td>94-11</td> 
 
<td>57-3, 227-0,2 ~5, 254-7</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>5</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>82-9, 161-11,  193-10, 209-1, 264-8</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>6</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>69-11, 345-11, 359-11</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>7</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>286-1, 321-6, 342-2, 370-11</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td>8</td> 
 
<td>none</td> 
 
<td>17-9, 59-1, 72-11, 173-11, 313-5, 322-6, 331-5, 445-1, 445-11, 475-11, 
479-1</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
<p> The problem Bob caught didn't seem to show up in the YMon files 
in the look area. 
</body> 
</html>  
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->


<!-- Date: Mon Feb 18 14:24:10 2002 -->
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
<html> 
<head> 
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686) [Netscape]"> 
</head> 
<body> 
There are 6 good runs last night to this morning. 
<br>  
<center><table BORDER COLS=2 WIDTH="50%" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" NOSAVE > 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>Run</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>Live Luminosity (nb-1)</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139334</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>2.802</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139335</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>11.302</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139336</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>24.716</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139337</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>34.761</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139338</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>61.231</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
 
<tr> 
<td> 
<center>139339</center> 
</td> 
 
<td> 
<center>8.274</center> 
</td> 
</tr> 
</table></center> 
 
<p> From Run 139337, the list of hot/warm and dead/cold cells  
and low/high residual cells are the same 
<br>as yesterday. But from run 139334 to 139336,  there are many additional 
hot cells in SL5-8, cells 
<br>with high/low residuals in SL2-8. I would think that 139334 is lack 
of statistics, bu not 139336. 
<p> Compare run 139338 with run 139277, hot cell 388 in SL8 is gone 
and cell 42 is not as hot as yesterday. 
<br>SL8 residual vs drift distance plot shows 139338 has residuals 10um 
larger than 139277. 
<br> Compare 5 runs with run 139338,  run 139334-139336 has large 
fluctuation in almost every plot. 
<br>  
<br>  
</body> 
</html>
<!-- Author: Shin-Shan Yu -->