<!-- Title: 22:16:38  Thu Mar 29 2001 -->
<!-- Crewchief: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op1: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op2: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op3: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op4: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op5: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Op6: M. Bishai -->
<!-- Notes: -->
<pre>WHY WAS THERE NO ENTRY IN BEFORE IN HERE DESPITE THE FACT THAT 
THIS WEDGE WAS TESTED!!!! WHERE ARE PLOTS.</pre>


<!-- Date: Thu Mar 29 22:19:24 2001 -->
<pre>IF YOU DON'T MAKE AN ENTRY DON'T EXPECT THINGS TO GET FIXED.... 
!@#$GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!@#$#$$%%</pre>
<!-- Author: An Unhappy Tester -->


<!-- Date: Thu Mar 29 22:42:31 2001 -->
<pre>Phew, calmed down - feel better after writing nasty entry. 
Anyway, HDI 0,1,3 init and readback fine. HDI2 looks like it 
inits current wise but it reads back all ffs. Tried reading 
out HDI2 looks like the first 4 bits are stuck high for channel 
numbers! 
 
/cdf/people2/svxii/daq/isl/se/data/laser48.svx 
 
I started seeing c4s in fib headers when reading out this 
channel only. See  
 
/cdf/people2/svxii/daq/isl/se/data/laser46.svx 
 
Bad cable or bad doim?</pre>
<!-- Author: M. Bishai -->


<!-- Date: Thu Mar 29 23:10:28 2001 -->
<pre>Biased the 3 working layers 
 
Layer 	Vbias	I 
------	------	--- 
0	70	10 
1	70	0 
3	140	33 
4	140	540         
 
Question for Matt: Is L00 all on sensitive or less sensitive 
scale.</pre>
<!-- Author: Mad Mary -->


<!-- Date: Thu Mar 29 23:12:09 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/silicon_pc/fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3/Thu_Mar_29_2001_231148.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3&action=view&page=-2  align='top'></td><td>Ummm. why do we have such huge noise?. Surely S/N = 6 at the beginning is not what we want!</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Mad Mary -->


<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 06:53:03 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3&action=view&page=-3&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3&action=view&page=-3  width='300' align='top'></td><td>Nice event with multiple short and long XFT tracks</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Steve Hahn -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 06;54;30 comment by...SCN -->
<pre>Uhh, this is the Silicon log book, Op Man...</pre>

<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 07;36;11 comment by...Steve Hahn -->
Oops, sorry!


<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 13;47;16 comment by...Mad Mary -->
<pre>You are forgiven</pre>


<!-- Date: Mon Apr 2 08:56:42 2001 -->
<pre>Junction card connection checklist and info about subsequent tests are <A HREF="http://ncdf17.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/lgbk?user=stuart&ent=10785">here</A>.</pre>
<!-- Author: DS -->


<!-- Date: Wed Apr 11 09:47:09 2001 -->
<pre>Controlled access: we swapped the OFTM for this wedge. 
 
old: serial #139, FNAL #565887 
new: serial #110, FNAL #564034 
 
 
rack is still down, will be fixed at next access</pre>
<!-- Author: Petra & Matt -->


<!-- Date: Sat Apr 14 11:08:36 2001 -->
<pre>Rack back up now. Plugged VTM back into b0svx06 slot 10.  
Ladders init. But lost ISL cooling before I could readout.</pre>
<!-- Author: Mad Mary -->


<!-- Date: Sat Apr 14 11:50:58 2001 -->
<pre>Reading out. Took several runs one had some c4 errors but took 
~svxii/daq/isl/se/data/laser63.svx 1000 events biased no errors. Couldn't reproduce bad run. I would say this is OK. 
 
Noise on the 3 layers run previously looks worse. See below.</pre>
<!-- Author: Mad Mary -->


<!-- Date: Sat Apr 14 11:58:28 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/silicon_pc/fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3/Sat_Apr_14_2001_115809.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=fa30-L00-E-BRL-W-End-P-3&action=view&page=-5  align='top'></td><td>All 4 layers of B1W3 biased 70/70/70/140/140</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Mad Mary -->
<!-- Comment: Wed Apr 18 11;09;59 comment by...Petra &quot;when is Jean coming back&quot; Lekrem -->
<pre>DON'T BE SO MAD MARY!</pre>


<!-- Date: Tue May 1 16:34:01 2001 -->
<pre>Tested in preparation for access. 
Everything worked fine. 
(100 events no errors)</pre>
<!-- Author: Lester -->
<!-- Comment: Tue May  1 16;40;11 comment by...Lester -->
(Did not power Layer 3 which has a DVDD overcurrent)