Thu Jan 19 15:10:47 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf
/home/christip/sw/freesurfer/bin//recon-all
-autorecon1 -subjid EEsurf
subjid EEsurf
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/christip/EE
FREESURFER_HOME /home/christip/sw/freesurfer
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/christip/sw/freesurfer
Linux varda 2.6.6-lac1.1 #1 SMP Tue Sep 7 14:02:40 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
cputime 	unlimited
filesize 	unlimited
datasize 	unlimited
stacksize 	8192 kbytes
coredumpsize 	0 kbytes
memoryuse 	unlimited
vmemoryuse 	unlimited
descriptors 	1024 
memorylocked 	unlimited
maxproc 	16379 
########################################
program versions used
$Id: recon-all-nmr,v 1.114 2005/09/28 21:38:23 nicks Exp $
$Id: mri_motion_correct2,v 1.9 2004/12/14 03:37:42 greve Exp $
mri_convert --version 
 $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/rawtominc/rawtominc.c,v 6.13.2.2 2005/03/16 19:02:52 bert Exp $
minctracc.c
$Header: /software/source/registration/mni_autoreg/minctracc/Main/minctracc.c,v 96.11 2004/02/12 05:54:22 rotor Exp $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/mincresample/mincresample.c,v 6.12.2.1 2005/03/16 19:02:51 bert Exp $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/mincaverage/mincaverage.c,v 6.4.2.2 2005/03/16 19:02:49 bert Exp $
$Id: talairach2,v 1.8 2005/09/06 13:54:17 nicks Exp $
mri_convert --version 
 $
# $Id: mritotal.in,v 1.12 2004/02/12 05:55:18 rotor Exp $
Program nu_correct, built from:
Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@kani (i686-pc-linux-gnu) on 2005-09-05 at 15:32:44
ProgramName: mri_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_normalize.c,v 1.37 2005/10/03 01:15:35 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_watershed ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_watershed.cpp,v 1.35 2005/09/14 15:41:47 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_segment ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_segment.c,v 1.27 2005/08/24 19:48:08 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_fill ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_fill.c,v 1.96 2005/09/20 21:22:12 xhan Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_tessellate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.24 2005/08/18 16:19:10 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_smooth ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_smooth.c,v 1.13 2005/08/15 14:22:53 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_inflate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_inflate.c,v 1.28 2005/08/15 14:23:37 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:24:12 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_fix_topology ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.32 2005/09/12 18:07:35 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_euler_number ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_euler_number.c,v 1.4 2003/09/05 04:45:41 kteich Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_make_surfaces ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.60 2005/08/22 17:47:27 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:24:12 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.30 2005/08/15 14:24:44 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mrisp_paint ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mrisp_paint.c,v 1.6 2005/02/14 04:30:19 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_label2label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_label2label.c,v 1.21 2004/11/16 00:35:37 greve Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_em_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_em_register.c,v 1.50 2005/05/30 20:36:05 xhan Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_normalize.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:14:22 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_register.c,v 1.35 2005/09/26 21:34:29 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:10:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_label.c,v 1.62 2005/08/18 13:29:41 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
#######################################
GCA RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca
AvgCurvTif average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif
GCS curvature.buckner40.filled.desikan_killiany.gcs
#######################################
Using COR format
---------------------------------------------
MotionCor Thu Jan 19 15:10:47 EST 2006

INFO: no runs were found in /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/orig/XXX,
however, there is a volume in /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/orig,
so I am just going to proceed with that as the input.
---------------------------------------------
Nu Intensity Correction Thu Jan 19 15:10:49 EST 2006
mri_convert orig nu0.mnc
mri_convert orig nu0.mnc 
reading from orig...
TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (0, 1, 0)
writing to nu0.mnc...
nu_correct -clobber nu0.mnc nu1.mnc
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:10:59] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26092/ nu0.mnc nu1.imp

Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Number of iterations: 3 
CV of field change: 0.000766305
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:08] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 nu0.mnc /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26092//template.mnc

Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done
nu_correct -clobber nu1.mnc nu2.mnc
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:15] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26168/ nu1.mnc nu2.imp

Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Number of iterations: 2 
CV of field change: 0.000792679
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:22] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 nu1.mnc /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26168//template.mnc

Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done
nu_correct -clobber nu2.mnc nu3.mnc
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:30] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26232/ nu2.mnc nu3.imp

Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Number of iterations: 2 
CV of field change: 0.000724081
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:36] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 nu2.mnc /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26232//template.mnc

Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done
nu_correct -clobber nu3.mnc nu4.mnc
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:44] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26296/ nu3.mnc nu4.imp

Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Processing:.................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Number of iterations: 2 
CV of field change: 0.000659383
[christip@varda:/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/] [2006-01-19 15:11:52] running:
  /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 nu3.mnc /usr/tmp/nu_correct_26296//template.mnc

Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Not implemented yet in cache_volume_range_has_changed()
Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done
mri_convert nu4.mnc nu
mri_convert nu4.mnc nu 
reading from nu4.mnc...
TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (0, 1, 0)
Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 256) voxels.
Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 256 voxels for all directions
writing to nu...
---------------------------------------------
Talairach Thu Jan 19 15:12:05 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
talairach2 EEsurf
INFO: registering EEsurf
Thu Jan 19 15:12:05 EST 2006
--------------------------------------------
mri_convert nu nu.mnc
mri_convert nu nu.mnc 
reading from nu...
TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (0, 1, 0)
writing to nu.mnc...
--------------------------------------------
mritotal -verbose -debug -clobber -modeldir /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/lib/mni/bin/../share/mni_autoreg -protocol icbm nu.mnc transforms/talairach.xfm
--------------------------------------------
mri_add_xform_to_header /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/orig /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/orig
Thu Jan 19 15:13:07 EST 2006
---------------------------------------------
Intensity Normalization Thu Jan 19 15:13:07 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_normalize -g 1 nu T1
using max gradient = 1.000
reading from nu...
normalizing image...
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
3d normalization pass 1 of 2
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
3d normalization pass 2 of 2
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
writing output to T1
3D bias adjustment took 5 minutes and 43 seconds.
white matter peak found at 110
gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 37 (37)
csf peak at 47, setting threshold to 74
white matter peak found at 110
gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 57 (57)
csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74
---------------------------------------------
Skull Stripping Thu Jan 19 15:18:53 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_watershed T1 brain


************************************************************
The input file is T1
The output file is brain
If this is incorrect, please exit quickly the program (Ctl-C)


*************************WATERSHED**************************
preflooding height equal to 25 percent
Sorting...
      T1-weighted MRI image
      modification of the preflooding height to 15 percent
      Count how many 110 voxels are present :  222547

      Find the largest 110-component...
             heap usage = 323848 Kbytes.
             current max segment has 172847 voxels
             removing small segments (less than 1 percent of maxarea).
             heap usage = 117216 Kbytes.
             removing small segments (less than 1 percent of maxarea).done
      And identify it as the main brain basin...done
      Main component: 172847 voxels
      first estimation of the COG coord: x=131 y=129 z=121 r=83
      first estimation of the main basin volume: 2400876 voxels
      global maximum in x=146, y=99, z=83, Imax=255
      CSF=15, WM_intensity=110, WM_VARIANCE=5
      WM_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MAX=110, WM_MAX=110 
done
Analyze

        0%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        0%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        1%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        1%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        1%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        2%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        2%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        3%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        3%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        3%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        4%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        4%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        5%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        5%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        5%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        6%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        6%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        7%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        7%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        7%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        8%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        8%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        9%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        9%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
        9%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       10%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       10%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       11%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       11%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       11%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       12%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       12%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       12%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       13%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       13%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       14%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       14%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       14%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       15%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       15%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       16%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       16%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       16%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       17%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       17%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       18%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       18%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       18%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       19%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       19%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       20%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       20%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       20%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       21%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       21%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       22%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       22%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       22%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       23%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       23%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       24%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       24%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       24%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       25%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       25%...        0 basins; main size =        0         
       25%...        3 basins; main size =        6         
       26%...        6 basins; main size =       15         
       26%...        5 basins; main size =       28         
       27%...       10 basins; main size =       36         
       27%...       14 basins; main size =       42         
       27%...       24 basins; main size =       54         
       28%...       32 basins; main size =       58         
       28%...       35 basins; main size =       68         
       29%...       41 basins; main size =      116         
       29%...       62 basins; main size =      215         
       29%...       73 basins; main size =      271         
       30%...       87 basins; main size =      413         
       30%...      105 basins; main size =      769         
       31%...      117 basins; main size =      845         
       31%...      144 basins; main size =      929         
       31%...      151 basins; main size =     1103         
       32%...      135 basins; main size =     1163         
       32%...      155 basins; main size =     1211         
       33%...      169 basins; main size =     1261         
       33%...      171 basins; main size =     1304         
       33%...      171 basins; main size =     1341         
       34%...      181 basins; main size =     1377         
       34%...      194 basins; main size =     1411         
       35%...      211 basins; main size =     1439         
       35%...      229 basins; main size =     1498         
       35%...      243 basins; main size =     1539         
       36%...      255 basins; main size =     1570         
       36%...      258 basins; main size =     1595         
       37%...      270 basins; main size =     1634         
       37%...      279 basins; main size =     1654         
       37%...      317 basins; main size =     1681         
       38%...      331 basins; main size =     1715         
       38%...      343 basins; main size =     1739         
       38%...      340 basins; main size =     2574         
       39%...      351 basins; main size =     2672         
       39%...      363 basins; main size =     2729         
       40%...      381 basins; main size =     2772         
       40%...      391 basins; main size =     2837         
       40%...      417 basins; main size =     2894         
       41%...      445 basins; main size =     2944         
       41%...      479 basins; main size =     2992         
       42%...      483 basins; main size =     3037         
       42%...      519 basins; main size =     3134         
       42%...      537 basins; main size =     3184         
       43%...      567 basins; main size =     3252         
       43%...      585 basins; main size =     3348         
       44%...      622 basins; main size =     3436         
       44%...      679 basins; main size =     3499         
       44%...      703 basins; main size =     3660         
       45%...      742 basins; main size =     3937         
       45%...      805 basins; main size =     4056         
       46%...      902 basins; main size =     4267         
       46%...      972 basins; main size =     4413         
       46%...     1044 basins; main size =     4553         
       47%...     1118 basins; main size =     4719         
       47%...     1186 basins; main size =     4840         
       48%...     1255 basins; main size =     4981         
       48%...     1334 basins; main size =     5222         
       48%...     1438 basins; main size =     5354         
       49%...     1520 basins; main size =     5514         
       49%...     1619 basins; main size =     5652         
       50%...     1754 basins; main size =     5798         
       50%...     1832 basins; main size =     5976         
       50%...     1976 basins; main size =     6125         
       51%...     2124 basins; main size =     6273         
       51%...     2244 basins; main size =     6416         
       51%...     2415 basins; main size =     6560         
       52%...     2534 basins; main size =     6687         
       52%...     2728 basins; main size =     6819         
       53%...     2964 basins; main size =     6949         
       53%...     3231 basins; main size =     7110         
       53%...     3582 basins; main size =     7252         
       54%...     3994 basins; main size =     7876         
       54%...     4533 basins; main size =     8770         
       55%...     5401 basins; main size =     9984         
       55%...     6725 basins; main size =    10805         
       55%...     8593 basins; main size =    11589         
       56%...    11084 basins; main size =    12376         
       56%...    13997 basins; main size =    14162         
       57%...     6012 basins; main size =   214548         
       57%...     6142 basins; main size =   234834         
       57%...     6174 basins; main size =   259450         
       58%...     6161 basins; main size =   289140         
       58%...     6196 basins; main size =   320959         
       59%...     6106 basins; main size =   351664         
       59%...     6127 basins; main size =   381484         
       59%...     6064 basins; main size =   411356         
       60%...     5934 basins; main size =   440883         
       60%...     5863 basins; main size =   470071         
       61%...     5748 basins; main size =   500907         
       61%...     5689 basins; main size =   531791         
       61%...     5560 basins; main size =   561946         
       62%...     5326 basins; main size =   592807         
       62%...     5101 basins; main size =   624868         
       62%...     4823 basins; main size =   656202         
       63%...     4669 basins; main size =   688530         
       63%...     4550 basins; main size =   721599         
       64%...     4315 basins; main size =   761488         
       64%...     4081 basins; main size =   796159         
       64%...     3860 basins; main size =   834502         
       65%...     3654 basins; main size =   867869         
       65%...     3500 basins; main size =   901746         
       66%...     3319 basins; main size =   937562         
       66%...     3167 basins; main size =   971352         
       66%...     3011 basins; main size =  1004913         
       67%...     2844 basins; main size =  1039083         
       67%...     2682 basins; main size =  1081647         
       68%...     2621 basins; main size =  1112797         
       68%...     2516 basins; main size =  1139520         
       68%...     2464 basins; main size =  1162308         
       69%...     2399 basins; main size =  1182643         
       69%...     2348 basins; main size =  1201779         
       70%...     2324 basins; main size =  1218769         
       70%...     2265 basins; main size =  1234814         
       70%...     2211 basins; main size =  1249139         
       71%...     2189 basins; main size =  1261853         
       71%...     2131 basins; main size =  1273075         
       72%...     2040 basins; main size =  1283476         
       72%...     1992 basins; main size =  1293562         
       72%...     1873 basins; main size =  1303448         
       73%...     1805 basins; main size =  1312864         
       73%...     1728 basins; main size =  1321698         
       74%...     1632 basins; main size =  1329809         
       74%...     1531 basins; main size =  1337410         
       74%...     1498 basins; main size =  1344851         
       75%...     1452 basins; main size =  1351884         
       75%...     1371 basins; main size =  1358930         
       75%...     1319 basins; main size =  1365355         
       76%...     1285 basins; main size =  1371844         
       76%...     1239 basins; main size =  1378018         
       77%...     1203 basins; main size =  1383840         
       77%...     1122 basins; main size =  1389345         
       77%...     1092 basins; main size =  1394732         
       78%...     1056 basins; main size =  1399923         
       78%...      982 basins; main size =  1407412         
       79%...      910 basins; main size =  1413389         
       79%...      909 basins; main size =  1418356         
       79%...      891 basins; main size =  1422943         
       80%...      860 basins; main size =  1427284         
       80%...      815 basins; main size =  1431760         
       81%...      773 basins; main size =  1436219         
       81%...      765 basins; main size =  1440562         
       81%...      745 basins; main size =  1445073         
       82%...      719 basins; main size =  1449358         
       82%...      663 basins; main size =  1453279         
       83%...      633 basins; main size =  1457084         
       83%...      578 basins; main size =  1460623         
       83%...      533 basins; main size =  1463996         
       84%...      450 basins; main size =  1467709         
       84%...      415 basins; main size =  1470951         
       85%...      391 basins; main size =  1474049         
       85%...      365 basins; main size =  1477174         
       85%...      346 basins; main size =  1480001         
       86%...      375 basins; main size =  1482800         
       86%...      405 basins; main size =  1485556         
       87%...      463 basins; main size =  1488195         
       87%...      501 basins; main size =  1490942         
       87%...      512 basins; main size =  1493802         
       88%...      532 basins; main size =  1496417         
       88%...      493 basins; main size =  1499041         
       88%...      514 basins; main size =  1501795         
       89%...      555 basins; main size =  1505926         
       89%...      563 basins; main size =  1509125         
       90%...      547 basins; main size =  1512027         
       90%...      553 basins; main size =  1514983         
       90%...      612 basins; main size =  1517981         
       91%...      643 basins; main size =  1521883         
       91%...      656 basins; main size =  1525506         
       92%...      680 basins; main size =  1529326         
       92%...      766 basins; main size =  1534266         
       92%...      856 basins; main size =  1538942         
       93%...     1026 basins; main size =  1545463         
       93%...     1268 basins; main size =  1552342         
       94%...     1570 basins; main size =  1558386         
       94%...     1822 basins; main size =  1566037         
       94%...     2510 basins; main size =  1575566         
       95%...     2903 basins; main size =  1583286         
       95%...     4239 basins; main size =  1591243         
       96%...     6092 basins; main size =  1602730         
       96%...     8092 basins; main size =  1614896         
       96%...    14444 basins; main size =  1626290         
       97%...    15743 basins; main size =  1641553         
       97%...    17085 basins; main size =  1655197         
       98%...     7268 basins; main size =  1665064         
       98%...     1293 basins; main size =  1674771         
       98%...      431 basins; main size =  1675244         
       99%...      186 basins; main size =  1675603         
       99%...      245 basins; main size =  1755182         
      100%...      182 basins; main size =  1817554         
      main basin size= 1675705 voxels, voxel volume =1.000         
                     = 1675705 mmm3 = 1675.705 cm3
done
PostAnalyze...
      ***** 0 basin(s) merged in 1 iteration(s)
      ***** 0 voxel(s) added to the main basin
      ambiguous basin, non merged: 2 ambiguous voxels; size: 794 voxels
done

********************TEMPLATE DEFORMATION********************
      second estimation of the COG coord: x=129,y=128, z=115, r=9858 iterations
      before analyzing : CSF_MAX=31, TRANSITION=52, GM_MIN=72, GM=92
      after  analyzing : CSF_MAX=31, TRANSITION=65, GM_MIN=72, GM=71
      mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain
      highly tesselated surface with 10242 vertices
      matching...65 iterations

*************************VALIDATION*************************
No Rigid alignment: Atlas Mode Off
      before rotation: sse = 2.39, sigma = 3.65
      after  rotation: sse = 2.39, sigma = 3.65
Localization of inacurate regions: Erosion-Dilatation steps
      the sse mean is  2.45, its var is  3.27   
      before Erosion-Dilatation  0.66% of inacurate vertices
      after  Erosion-Dilatation  0.00% of inacurate vertices
      Validation of the shape of the surface done.
Scaling of atlas fields onto current surface fields

************FINAL ITERATIVE TEMPLATE DEFORMATION************
Compute Local values csf/gray
Fine Segmentation...44 iterations

      mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain

Brain Size = 1677902 voxels, voxel volume = 1.000 mm3
           = 1677902 mmm3 = 1677.902 cm3


******************************
Save...done
INFO: starting per-hemisphere operations
----- Starting Hemisphere lh --------
----- Starting Hemisphere rh --------

-------------------------------------------

recon-all finished without error at Thu Jan 19 15:20:51 EST 2006



New invocation of recon-all 



Thu Jan 19 15:22:47 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf
/home/christip/sw/freesurfer/bin//recon-all
-autorecon2 -subjid EEsurf
subjid EEsurf
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/christip/EE
FREESURFER_HOME /home/christip/sw/freesurfer
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/christip/sw/freesurfer
Linux varda 2.6.6-lac1.1 #1 SMP Tue Sep 7 14:02:40 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
cputime 	unlimited
filesize 	unlimited
datasize 	unlimited
stacksize 	8192 kbytes
coredumpsize 	0 kbytes
memoryuse 	unlimited
vmemoryuse 	unlimited
descriptors 	1024 
memorylocked 	unlimited
maxproc 	16379 
########################################
program versions used
$Id: recon-all-nmr,v 1.114 2005/09/28 21:38:23 nicks Exp $
$Id: mri_motion_correct2,v 1.9 2004/12/14 03:37:42 greve Exp $
mri_convert --version 
 $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/rawtominc/rawtominc.c,v 6.13.2.2 2005/03/16 19:02:52 bert Exp $
minctracc.c
$Header: /software/source/registration/mni_autoreg/minctracc/Main/minctracc.c,v 96.11 2004/02/12 05:54:22 rotor Exp $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/mincresample/mincresample.c,v 6.12.2.1 2005/03/16 19:02:51 bert Exp $
$Header: /software/source/minc/progs/mincaverage/mincaverage.c,v 6.4.2.2 2005/03/16 19:02:49 bert Exp $
$Id: talairach2,v 1.8 2005/09/06 13:54:17 nicks Exp $
mri_convert --version 
 $
# $Id: mritotal.in,v 1.12 2004/02/12 05:55:18 rotor Exp $
Program nu_correct, built from:
Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@kani (i686-pc-linux-gnu) on 2005-09-05 at 15:32:44
ProgramName: mri_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_normalize.c,v 1.37 2005/10/03 01:15:35 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_watershed ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_watershed.cpp,v 1.35 2005/09/14 15:41:47 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_segment ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_segment.c,v 1.27 2005/08/24 19:48:08 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_fill ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_fill.c,v 1.96 2005/09/20 21:22:12 xhan Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_tessellate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.24 2005/08/18 16:19:10 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_smooth ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_smooth.c,v 1.13 2005/08/15 14:22:53 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_inflate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_inflate.c,v 1.28 2005/08/15 14:23:37 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:24:12 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_fix_topology ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.32 2005/09/12 18:07:35 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_euler_number ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_euler_number.c,v 1.4 2003/09/05 04:45:41 kteich Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_make_surfaces ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.60 2005/08/22 17:47:27 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:24:12 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mris_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.30 2005/08/15 14:24:44 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mrisp_paint ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mrisp_paint.c,v 1.6 2005/02/14 04:30:19 segonne Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_label2label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_label2label.c,v 1.21 2004/11/16 00:35:37 greve Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_em_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_em_register.c,v 1.50 2005/05/30 20:36:05 xhan Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_normalize.c,v 1.31 2005/08/15 14:14:22 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_register.c,v 1.35 2005/09/26 21:34:29 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
ProgramName: mri_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name:  $ TimeStamp: 06/01/19-20:22:47-GMT CVS: $Id: mri_ca_label.c,v 1.62 2005/08/18 13:29:41 fischl Exp $ User: UNKNOWN Machine: varda Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.6-lac1.1 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30200
#######################################
GCA RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca
AvgCurvTif average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif
GCS curvature.buckner40.filled.desikan_killiany.gcs
#######################################
Using COR format
--------------------------------------
GCARegistration Thu Jan 19 15:22:47 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_em_register -mask brain -p .5 -fsamples fsamples nu /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca transforms/talairach.lta
using MR volume brain to mask input volume...
using top 50.0% wm points as control points....
writing transformed control points to fsamples...
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach.log
reading '/home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca'...
setting gca type = Normal gca type
Direction cosines read:
 x_r = -1.0000, y_r =  0.0000, z_r =  0.0000
 x_a =  0.0000, y_a =  0.0000, z_a =  1.0000
 x_s =  0.0000, y_s = -1.0000, z_s =  0.0000
 c_r =  0.0000, c_a =  0.0000, c_s =  0.0000
average std = 7.7   using min determinant for regularization = 6.0
0 singular and 1362 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
reading 'nu'...
total sample mean = 87.8 (525 zeros)
register_mri: find_optimal_transform
find_optimal_transform: nsamples 2700, passno 0, spacing 8
************************************************
First Search limited to translation only.
************************************************
Found translation: (-4.0, -9.7, -13.1): log p = -33153.7
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-21090.4, old_max_log_p =-33153.7 (thresh=-33120.6)
 1.114   0.022  -0.138  -5.364;
 0.000   1.184   0.148  -50.284;
 0.157  -0.155   0.981  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-21090.4, old_max_log_p =-21090.4 (thresh=-21069.3)
 1.114   0.022  -0.138  -5.364;
 0.000   1.184   0.148  -50.284;
 0.157  -0.155   0.981  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.11405   0.02179  -0.13782  -5.36359;
 0.00000   1.18368   0.14787  -50.28392;
 0.15657  -0.15505   0.98063  -11.86491;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 2700
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.11405   0.02179  -0.13782  -5.36359;
 0.00000   1.18368   0.14787  -50.28392;
 0.15657  -0.15505   0.98063  -11.86491;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
pass 2 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 3 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 4 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 5 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 6 through quasi-newton minimization...
fp = 20444.167969, fret = 20444.056641, ftol = 0.000010, EPS = 0.000000
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.11405   0.02179  -0.13782  -5.36359;
 0.00000   1.18368   0.14787  -50.28392;
 0.15657  -0.15505   0.98063  -11.86491;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 269906
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.11405   0.02179  -0.13782  -5.36359;
 0.00000   1.18368   0.14787  -50.28392;
 0.15657  -0.15505   0.98063  -11.86491;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
pass 2 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 3 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 4 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 5 through quasi-newton minimization...
pass 6 through quasi-newton minimization...
freeing gibbs priors...done.
bounding unknown intensity as < 0.8 or > 724.1 
************************************************
spacing=8, using 2700 sample points, tol=1.00e-05...
************************************************
Note: program considers input volume #1 as the most T1-like
using real data threshold=44.0
using (105, 105, 126) as brain centroid...
mean wm in atlas = 110, using box (88,90,106) --> (121, 120,145) to find MRI wm
before smoothing, mri peak at 138
after smoothing, mri peak at 139, scaling input intensities by 0.789
scaling channel 0 by 0.789178
initial log_p = -79268.9

****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 0 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 1 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
reducing scale to 0.2500
***********************************************
Computing MAP estimate using 2700 samples...
***********************************************
dfp_em_step_func: 002: -log(p) = 21090.4
after pass:transform: ( 1.11, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.16, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 003: -log(p) = 20726.4
after pass:transform: ( 1.11, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 004: -log(p) = 20523.6
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 005: -log(p) = 20495.7
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 006: -log(p) = 20458.1
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 007: -log(p) = 20444.2
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.98, -11.86)
outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 009: -log(p) = 20444.2  tol 0.000010
Resulting transform:
 1.114   0.022  -0.138  -5.364;
 0.000   1.184   0.148  -50.284;
 0.157  -0.155   0.981  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;

pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -21090.4 (old=-79268.9)
transform before final EM align:
 1.114   0.022  -0.138  -5.364;
 0.000   1.184   0.148  -50.284;
 0.157  -0.155   0.981  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;

**************************************************
 EM alignment process ...
 Computing final MAP estimate using 269906 samples. 
**************************************************
dfp_em_step_func: 008: -log(p) = 2116484.0
after pass:transform: ( 1.11, 0.02, -0.14, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.16, 0.98, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 009: -log(p) = 2061547.8
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.03, -0.13, -5.36)
                      ( -0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.15, 0.99, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 010: -log(p) = 2056838.6
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.03, -0.13, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.14, 0.99, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 011: -log(p) = 2055856.6
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.03, -0.13, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.14, 0.99, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 012: -log(p) = 2052384.5
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.03, -0.13, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.14, 0.99, -11.86)
dfp_em_step_func: 013: -log(p) = 2049212.4
after pass:transform: ( 1.12, 0.03, -0.13, -5.36)
                      ( 0.00, 1.18, 0.15, -50.28)
                      ( 0.16, -0.14, 0.99, -11.86)
outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 015: -log(p) = 2047524.9  tol 0.000000
final transform:
 1.115   0.027  -0.131  -5.364;
 0.003   1.181   0.15writing samples to fsamples...
3  -50.284;
 0.162  -0.143   0.989  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;

writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.lta...
writing transformed samples to fsamples...
samples written
registration took 8 minutes and 18 seconds.
---------------------------------------
CA Normalize Thu Jan 19 15:31:05 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_ca_normalize -mask brain nu /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca transforms/talairach.lta norm
using MR volume brain to mask input volume...
reading 1 input volumes
reading atlas from '/home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca'...
setting gca type = Normal gca type
Direction cosines read:
 x_r = -1.0000, y_r =  0.0000, z_r =  0.0000
 x_a =  0.0000, y_a =  0.0000, z_a =  1.0000
 x_s =  0.0000, y_s = -1.0000, z_s =  0.0000
 c_r =  0.0000, c_a =  0.0000, c_s =  0.0000
reading transform from 'transforms/talairach.lta'...
INFO: compute sample coordinates transform
 1.115   0.027  -0.131  -5.364;
 0.003   1.181   0.153  -50.284;
 0.162  -0.143   0.989  -11.865;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
INFO: transform used
reading input volume from nu...
Note: program considers input volume #1 as the most T1-like
using real data threshold=44.0
using (105, 105, 126) as brain centroid...
mean wm in atlas = 110, using box (88,90,106) --> (121, 120,145) to find MRI wm
before smoothing, mri peak at 138
after smoothing, mri peak at 139, scaling input intensities by 0.789
scaling channel 0 by 0.789178
using 269906 sample points...
finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 43340 control points for structure...
bounding box (123, 67, 39) --> (190, 167, 199)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 96.0 --> 108.0
751 of 1400 (53.6%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 43115 control points for structure...
bounding box (68, 68, 42) --> (133, 168, 202)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 97.0 --> 113.0
310 of 759 (40.8%) samples deleted
finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 3795 control points for structure...
bounding box (127, 146, 62) --> (174, 184, 115)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 91.0 --> 119.0
16 of 124 (12.9%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 3444 control points for structure...
bounding box (83, 146, 66) --> (127, 184, 120)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 104.0 --> 124.0
25 of 104 (24.0%) samples deleted
finding control points in Brain_Stem....
found 3721 control points for structure...
bounding box (112, 134, 99) --> (145, 198, 128)
Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 98.0 --> 116.0
41 of 165 (24.8%) samples deleted
using 2552 total control points for intensity normalization...
bias field = 1.046 +- 0.126
0 of 1409 control points discarded
writing normalized volume to norm...
freeing GCA...done.
normalization took 1 minutes and 27 seconds.
---------------------------------------
CA Reg Thu Jan 19 15:32:32 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_ca_register -cross-sequence -mask brain -T transforms/talairach.lta norm /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca transforms/talairach.m3z
registering sequences, equivalent to:
	-renormalize
	-avgs 2
	-regularize 0.500
using MR volume brain to mask input volume...
using previously computed transform transforms/talairach.lta
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach.log
reading input volume 'norm'...
reading GCA '/home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca'...
setting gca type = Normal gca type
Direction cosines read:
 x_r = -1.0000, y_r =  0.0000, z_r =  0.0000
 x_a =  0.0000, y_a =  0.0000, z_a =  1.0000
 x_s =  0.0000, y_s = -1.0000, z_s =  0.0000
 c_r =  0.0000, c_a =  0.0000, c_s =  0.0000
freeing gibbs priors...done.
average std[0] = 5.0
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
renormalizing input #0
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): mean = 109.49 +- 20.0
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): peak at 118.00, smooth at 118.00 (42827 voxels), scaling by 1.08
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 118.00, smooth at 118.00 (42827 voxels), scaling by 1.08
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): mean = 68.15 +- 20.0
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): peak at 98.00, smooth at 98.00 (43656 voxels), scaling by 1.44
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 98.00, smooth at 98.00 (43656 voxels), scaling by 1.44
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): mean = 33.17 +- 20.0
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): peak at 44.00, smooth at 43.00 (1538 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 44.00, smooth at 43.00 (1538 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): mean = 89.00 +- 20.0
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): peak at 105.00, smooth at 106.00 (3778 voxels), scaling by 1.19
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 105.00, smooth at 106.00 (3778 voxels), scaling by 1.19
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): mean = 61.00 +- 20.0
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): peak at 93.00, smooth at 90.00 (9974 voxels), scaling by 1.48
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 93.00, smooth at 90.00 (9974 voxels), scaling by 1.48
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): mean = 99.62 +- 20.0
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): peak at 101.00, smooth at 101.00 (1178 voxels), scaling by 1.01
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 101.00, smooth at 101.00 (1178 voxels), scaling by 1.01
Left_Caudate (11): mean = 85.59 +- 20.0
Left_Caudate (11): peak at 102.00, smooth at 102.00 (447 voxels), scaling by 1.19
Left_Caudate (11): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 102.00, smooth at 102.00 (447 voxels), scaling by 1.19
Left_Putamen (12): mean = 87.85 +- 20.0
Left_Putamen (12): peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (975 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Putamen (12): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (975 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Pallidum (13): mean = 105.27 +- 20.0
Left_Pallidum (13): peak at 115.00, smooth at 115.00 (295 voxels), scaling by 1.09
Left_Pallidum (13): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 115.00, smooth at 115.00 (295 voxels), scaling by 1.09
Third_Ventricle (14): mean = 38.30 +- 20.0
Third_Ventricle (14): peak at 71.00, smooth at 72.00 (218 voxels), scaling by 1.88
Third_Ventricle (14): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 71.00, smooth at 49.00 (218 voxels), scaling by 1.28
Fourth_Ventricle (15): mean = 31.24 +- 20.0
Fourth_Ventricle (15): peak at 41.00, smooth at 41.00 (310 voxels), scaling by 1.31
Fourth_Ventricle (15): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 41.00, smooth at 41.00 (310 voxels), scaling by 1.31
Brain_Stem (16): mean = 86.53 +- 20.0
Brain_Stem (16): peak at 107.00, smooth at 107.00 (3651 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Brain_Stem (16): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 107.00, smooth at 107.00 (3651 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Left_Hippocampus (17): mean = 69.24 +- 20.0
Left_Hippocampus (17): peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (536 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Left_Hippocampus (17): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (536 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Left_Amygdala (18): mean = 68.14 +- 20.0
Left_Amygdala (18): peak at 96.00, smooth at 96.00 (231 voxels), scaling by 1.41
Left_Amygdala (18): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 96.00, smooth at 96.00 (231 voxels), scaling by 1.41
CSF (24): mean = 47.28 +- 20.0
CSF (24): peak at 80.00, smooth at 80.00 (132 voxels), scaling by 1.69
!!!!!!!!!additional peak detected at 60.0 (was 51.0) - unreliable estimate...
Left_Accumbens_area (26): mean = 76.37 +- 20.0
Left_Accumbens_area (26): peak at 92.00, smooth at 92.00 (89 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_VentralDC (28): mean = 95.93 +- 20.0
Left_VentralDC (28): peak at 108.00, smooth at 108.00 (788 voxels), scaling by 1.13
Left_VentralDC (28): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 108.00, smooth at 108.00 (788 voxels), scaling by 1.13
Left_undetermined (29): mean = 42.56 +- 20.0
Left_vessel (30): mean = 69.03 +- 20.0
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): mean = 109.90 +- 20.0
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): peak at 116.00, smooth at 116.00 (42658 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 116.00, smooth at 116.00 (42658 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): mean = 68.27 +- 20.0
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): peak at 93.00, smooth at 93.00 (43851 voxels), scaling by 1.36
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 93.00, smooth at 93.00 (43851 voxels), scaling by 1.36
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): mean = 30.84 +- 20.0
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): peak at 39.00, smooth at 116.00 (1377 voxels), scaling by 3.76
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 39.00, smooth at 39.00 (1377 voxels), scaling by 1.26
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): mean = 88.62 +- 20.0
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): peak at 109.00, smooth at 109.00 (3432 voxels), scaling by 1.23
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 109.00, smooth at 109.00 (3432 voxels), scaling by 1.23
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): mean = 61.77 +- 20.0
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): peak at 93.00, smooth at 94.00 (10584 voxels), scaling by 1.52
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 93.00, smooth at 94.00 (10584 voxels), scaling by 1.52
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): mean = 93.42 +- 20.0
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (1081 voxels), scaling by 1.12
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (1081 voxels), scaling by 1.12
Right_Caudate (50): mean = 77.87 +- 20.0
Right_Caudate (50): peak at 97.00, smooth at 96.00 (437 voxels), scaling by 1.23
Right_Caudate (50): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 97.00, smooth at 96.00 (437 voxels), scaling by 1.23
Right_Putamen (51): mean = 89.25 +- 20.0
Right_Putamen (51): peak at 104.00, smooth at 104.00 (925 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Putamen (51): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 104.00, smooth at 104.00 (925 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Pallidum (52): mean = 107.08 +- 20.0
Right_Pallidum (52): peak at 111.00, smooth at 110.00 (291 voxels), scaling by 1.03
Right_Pallidum (52): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 111.00, smooth at 110.00 (291 voxels), scaling by 1.03
Right_Hippocampus (53): mean = 67.83 +- 20.0
Right_Hippocampus (53): peak at 87.00, smooth at 88.00 (554 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Right_Hippocampus (53): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 87.00, smooth at 88.00 (554 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Right_Amygdala (54): mean = 66.74 +- 20.0
Right_Amygdala (54): peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (253 voxels), scaling by 1.36
Right_Amygdala (54): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (253 voxels), scaling by 1.36
Right_Accumbens_area (58): mean = 77.87 +- 20.0
Right_Accumbens_area (58): peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (80 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Accumbens_area (58): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (80 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_VentralDC (60): mean = 93.64 +- 20.0
Right_VentralDC (60): peak at 111.00, smooth at 112.00 (762 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Right_VentralDC (60): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 111.00, smooth at 88.00 (762 voxels), scaling by 0.94
Right_vessel (62): mean = 66.14 +- 20.0
Fifth_Ventricle (72): mean = 35.58 +- 20.0
WM_hypointensities (77): mean = 86.63 +- 20.0
Left_WM_hypointensities (78): mean = 92.15 +- 20.0
Right_WM_hypointensities (79): mean = 91.70 +- 20.0
non_WM_hypointensities (80): mean = 65.14 +- 20.0
Left_non_WM_hypointensities (81): mean = 73.52 +- 20.0
Right_non_WM_hypointensities (82): mean = 69.97 +- 20.0
Optic_Chiasm (85): mean = 77.72 +- 20.0
Left_Inf_Lat_Vent (5): scaling by 1.22 = 57.2 (based on 1.30 for lateral ventricle)
Right_Inf_Lat_Vent (44): scaling by 1.20 = 49.1 (based on 1.26 for lateral ventricle)
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
**************** pass 1 of 1 ************************
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.01
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
246 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.002 mm @ (79, 58, 19), Area=5.9088, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 103.3 (112.1)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
251 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 3.501 mm @ (84, 52, 29), Area=4.7561, Ratio of new/orig=0.805, vals(means) = 124.2 (118.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
267 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.324 mm @ (95, 76, 68), Area=6.5105, Ratio of new/orig=1.102, vals(means) = 65.5 (9.2)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
251 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.880 mm @ (82, 48, 32), Area=4.6030, Ratio of new/orig=0.779, vals(means) = 117.9 (137.9)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
257 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.446 mm @ (83, 62, 58), Area=6.7310, Ratio of new/orig=1.139, vals(means) = 92.7 (103.9)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
271 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 4.487 mm @ (67, 50, 60), Area=5.2770, Ratio of new/orig=0.893, vals(means) = 54.8 (22.2)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
261 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.231 mm @ (40, 37, 56), Area=5.3320, Ratio of new/orig=0.902, vals(means) = 77.7 (93.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
260 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 4.429 mm @ (65, 50, 65), Area=5.3754, Ratio of new/orig=0.910, vals(means) = 111.9 (124.5)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
273 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.176 mm @ (85, 57, 55), Area=6.0607, Ratio of new/orig=1.026, vals(means) = 78.8 (95.8)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
252 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 3.328 mm @ (68, 51, 60), Area=5.0668, Ratio of new/orig=0.857, vals(means) = 41.6 (25.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
267 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.149 mm @ (58, 52, 66), Area=5.1491, Ratio of new/orig=0.871, vals(means) = 53.6 (24.3)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
260 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 3.740 mm @ (66, 51, 66), Area=5.1561, Ratio of new/orig=0.873, vals(means) = 99.3 (34.3)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
256 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.079 mm @ (88, 55, 52), Area=5.8752, Ratio of new/orig=0.994, vals(means) = 79.4 (88.3)  
47 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
230 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 15.786 mm @ (46, 74, 50), Area=6.3329, Ratio of new/orig=1.072, vals(means) = 85.1 (83.5)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
259 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.849 mm @ (50, 71, 48), Area=5.5144, Ratio of new/orig=0.933, vals(means) = 100.9 (125.2)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
236 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.103 mm @ (50, 73, 49), Area=5.6628, Ratio of new/orig=0.958, vals(means) = 107.6 (118.3)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
245 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.071 mm @ (51, 72, 48), Area=5.5019, Ratio of new/orig=0.931, vals(means) = 97.9 (118.3)  
28 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
245 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.024 mm @ (88, 55, 53), Area=5.7625, Ratio of new/orig=0.975, vals(means) = 85.3 (88.3)  
26 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
245 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.000 mm @ (62, 32, 77), Area=6.4881, Ratio of new/orig=1.098, vals(means) = 92.2 (30.0)  
9 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
242 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.193 mm @ (63, 87, 55), Area=6.5349, Ratio of new/orig=1.106, vals(means) = 49.7 (28.9)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
237 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.000 mm @ (62, 60, 72), Area=4.4034, Ratio of new/orig=0.745, vals(means) = 62.2 (48.2)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
249 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.104 mm @ (81, 70, 46), Area=5.5197, Ratio of new/orig=0.934, vals(means) = 88.5 (90.5)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
251 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.303 mm @ (68, 55, 51), Area=6.0765, Ratio of new/orig=1.028, vals(means) = 72.9 (39.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
228 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.113 mm @ (62, 56, 65), Area=5.0964, Ratio of new/orig=0.863, vals(means) = 46.0 (40.4)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
235 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.861 mm @ (64, 52, 65), Area=5.4106, Ratio of new/orig=0.916, vals(means) = 81.8 (23.1)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
213 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.073 mm @ (68, 64, 63), Area=5.4451, Ratio of new/orig=0.922, vals(means) = 114.7 (129.8)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
213 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.166 mm @ (63, 55, 65), Area=5.2240, Ratio of new/orig=0.884, vals(means) = 79.2 (43.8)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.159 mm @ (66, 58, 67), Area=4.5361, Ratio of new/orig=0.768, vals(means) = 51.2 (43.9)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
203 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.854 mm @ (63, 57, 64), Area=5.3693, Ratio of new/orig=0.909, vals(means) = 96.5 (77.2)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
194 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.171 mm @ (66, 58, 66), Area=4.7247, Ratio of new/orig=0.800, vals(means) = 45.3 (43.9)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
196 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.098 mm @ (57, 56, 59), Area=5.3310, Ratio of new/orig=0.902, vals(means) = 102.0 (109.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
191 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.048 mm @ (89, 56, 79), Area=6.9092, Ratio of new/orig=1.169, vals(means) = 74.5 (104.4)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
201 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.105 mm @ (62, 65, 47), Area=7.0837, Ratio of new/orig=1.199, vals(means) = 102.6 (81.5)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.045 mm @ (32, 78, 27), Area=6.3777, Ratio of new/orig=1.079, vals(means) = 0.0 (0.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
177 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.097 mm @ (57, 56, 59), Area=5.3940, Ratio of new/orig=0.913, vals(means) = 102.3 (109.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.058 mm @ (57, 54, 57), Area=5.0998, Ratio of new/orig=0.863, vals(means) = 102.6 (118.2)  
10 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
179 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.059 mm @ (68, 59, 66), Area=4.5800, Ratio of new/orig=0.775, vals(means) = 97.0 (109.6)  
39 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.088 mm @ (74, 66, 49), Area=6.1877, Ratio of new/orig=1.047, vals(means) = 66.9 (82.2)  
90 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
171 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.048 mm @ (87, 29, 48), Area=5.1413, Ratio of new/orig=0.870, vals(means) = 111.1 (105.2)  
156 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.074 mm @ (80, 63, 46), Area=4.5480, Ratio of new/orig=0.770, vals(means) = 81.5 (83.3)  
232 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
173 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.055 mm @ (54, 41, 45), Area=3.4172, Ratio of new/orig=0.578, vals(means) = 117.4 (127.4)  
364 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
169 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.071 mm @ (55, 42, 44), Area=3.3832, Ratio of new/orig=0.573, vals(means) = 122.2 (130.9)  
497 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
167 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.081 mm @ (55, 41, 45), Area=3.5099, Ratio of new/orig=0.594, vals(means) = 118.8 (127.4)  
595 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
179 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.084 mm @ (54, 41, 43), Area=3.5130, Ratio of new/orig=0.595, vals(means) = 119.7 (138.6)  
675 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
178 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.092 mm @ (55, 42, 42), Area=3.5924, Ratio of new/orig=0.608, vals(means) = 121.2 (131.6)  
748 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
175 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.099 mm @ (55, 41, 43), Area=3.5285, Ratio of new/orig=0.597, vals(means) = 119.3 (138.6)  
826 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
172 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.106 mm @ (56, 42, 42), Area=3.7124, Ratio of new/orig=0.628, vals(means) = 120.5 (122.9)  
815 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
171 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.111 mm @ (56, 41, 43), Area=3.6852, Ratio of new/orig=0.624, vals(means) = 118.7 (125.4)  
810 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
175 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.130 mm @ (55, 43, 42), Area=3.3091, Ratio of new/orig=0.560, vals(means) = 120.9 (131.6)  
764 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
176 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.116 mm @ (54, 42, 44), Area=3.3747, Ratio of new/orig=0.571, vals(means) = 122.4 (130.9)  
681 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
166 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.125 mm @ (54, 43, 43), Area=3.3425, Ratio of new/orig=0.566, vals(means) = 118.8 (131.6)  
593 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
162 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.122 mm @ (54, 45, 43), Area=3.2454, Ratio of new/orig=0.549, vals(means) = 124.6 (130.2)  
486 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
163 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.144 mm @ (54, 44, 43), Area=3.4200, Ratio of new/orig=0.579, vals(means) = 115.7 (130.2)  
336 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
173 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.127 mm @ (56, 42, 42), Area=3.5774, Ratio of new/orig=0.605, vals(means) = 120.9 (122.9)  
200 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.155 mm @ (54, 44, 43), Area=3.3802, Ratio of new/orig=0.572, vals(means) = 115.8 (130.2)  
134 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
174 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.137 mm @ (55, 43, 42), Area=3.4752, Ratio of new/orig=0.588, vals(means) = 121.5 (131.6)  
105 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
161 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.127 mm @ (54, 45, 43), Area=3.4365, Ratio of new/orig=0.582, vals(means) = 122.9 (130.2)  
67 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.110 mm @ (55, 44, 42), Area=3.6184, Ratio of new/orig=0.612, vals(means) = 119.6 (130.2)  
45 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
161 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.107 mm @ (56, 43, 42), Area=3.6256, Ratio of new/orig=0.614, vals(means) = 120.6 (122.9)  
34 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
166 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.103 mm @ (54, 45, 43), Area=3.3716, Ratio of new/orig=0.571, vals(means) = 123.3 (130.2)  
28 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
174 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.121 mm @ (55, 45, 43), Area=3.5157, Ratio of new/orig=0.595, vals(means) = 116.4 (130.2)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
177 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.171 mm @ (48, 73, 52), Area=6.5513, Ratio of new/orig=1.109, vals(means) = 90.7 (84.3)  
14 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
184 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.096 mm @ (55, 42, 43), Area=3.7665, Ratio of new/orig=0.637, vals(means) = 120.4 (131.6)  
10 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
191 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.157 mm @ (53, 67, 47), Area=5.3385, Ratio of new/orig=0.903, vals(means) = 98.4 (87.6)  
10 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
181 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.077 mm @ (55, 43, 42), Area=3.5682, Ratio of new/orig=0.604, vals(means) = 121.1 (131.6)  
9 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.092 mm @ (60, 53, 53), Area=4.2012, Ratio of new/orig=0.711, vals(means) = 75.3 (35.4)  
12 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.090 mm @ (55, 46, 43), Area=3.3616, Ratio of new/orig=0.569, vals(means) = 117.8 (128.8)  
5 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.073 mm @ (66, 49, 70), Area=3.8691, Ratio of new/orig=0.655, vals(means) = 110.2 (127.6)  
5 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
188 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.139 mm @ (51, 74, 53), Area=6.3169, Ratio of new/orig=1.069, vals(means) = 99.2 (103.1)  
5 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.071 mm @ (48, 75, 56), Area=7.2125, Ratio of new/orig=1.221, vals(means) = 85.9 (77.2)  
7 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
196 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.092 mm @ (60, 54, 53), Area=4.4988, Ratio of new/orig=0.761, vals(means) = 67.4 (38.7)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
194 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.055 mm @ (46, 68, 50), Area=5.9163, Ratio of new/orig=1.001, vals(means) = 85.1 (93.4)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.122 mm @ (49, 70, 53), Area=6.6673, Ratio of new/orig=1.128, vals(means) = 96.0 (90.2)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
201 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.049 mm @ (55, 45, 43), Area=3.3626, Ratio of new/orig=0.569, vals(means) = 116.1 (130.2)  
4 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
194 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.120 mm @ (52, 70, 49), Area=5.6913, Ratio of new/orig=0.963, vals(means) = 105.4 (107.2)  
4 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.048 mm @ (54, 39, 44), Area=3.8621, Ratio of new/orig=0.654, vals(means) = 114.7 (119.9)  
4 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
191 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.056 mm @ (54, 39, 44), Area=3.9365, Ratio of new/orig=0.666, vals(means) = 114.7 (119.9)  
2 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
182 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.046 mm @ (55, 40, 43), Area=3.8680, Ratio of new/orig=0.655, vals(means) = 115.8 (138.6)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.000 mm @ (80, 76, 52), Area=5.7655, Ratio of new/orig=0.976, vals(means) = 95.7 (84.5)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.000 mm @ (0, 0, 0), Area=5.9115, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 0.0 (0.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.000 mm @ (0, 0, 0), Area=5.9115, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 0.0 (0.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.03
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.001 mm @ (63, 31, 76), Area=7.5915, Ratio of new/orig=1.285, vals(means) = 98.6 (21.3)  
2025 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
200 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.582 mm @ (76, 50, 57), Area=3.8156, Ratio of new/orig=0.646, vals(means) = 107.2 (122.7)  
14959 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
167 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 7.977 mm @ (79, 45, 52), Area=1.6108, Ratio of new/orig=0.273, vals(means) = 113.1 (127.8)  
16453 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 229 more than 0.25, 18 more than .1
pct change decreased
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 31.034 mm @ (79, 46, 54), Area=0.5671, Ratio of new/orig=0.096, vals(means) = 112.6 (125.8)  
16536 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 116 more than 0.25, 7 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.572 mm @ (79, 48, 53), Area=1.6840, Ratio of new/orig=0.285, vals(means) = 114.6 (127.8)  
16591 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 54 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.526 mm @ (80, 46, 53), Area=1.7106, Ratio of new/orig=0.289, vals(means) = 115.1 (128.5)  
16681 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 45 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.573 mm @ (78, 41, 52), Area=2.8452, Ratio of new/orig=0.482, vals(means) = 114.0 (125.6)  
16805 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 40 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.583 mm @ (81, 41, 52), Area=3.1738, Ratio of new/orig=0.537, vals(means) = 116.8 (125.8)  
16813 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.537 mm @ (80, 42, 53), Area=1.9166, Ratio of new/orig=0.324, vals(means) = 114.7 (128.0)  
16926 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 17 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.513 mm @ (81, 41, 53), Area=2.2844, Ratio of new/orig=0.387, vals(means) = 112.4 (125.8)  
17058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 18 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.046 mm @ (81, 40, 52), Area=2.2400, Ratio of new/orig=0.379, vals(means) = 116.2 (125.8)  
17453 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 14 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
177 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 7.525 mm @ (79, 39, 53), Area=2.9574, Ratio of new/orig=0.500, vals(means) = 110.9 (123.8)  
17488 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
177 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.411 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=2.7278, Ratio of new/orig=0.462, vals(means) = 113.9 (127.1)  
17517 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
177 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.136 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=2.0321, Ratio of new/orig=0.344, vals(means) = 113.2 (127.1)  
17598 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
178 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.175 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=1.7087, Ratio of new/orig=0.289, vals(means) = 112.8 (127.1)  
17669 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
181 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.085 mm @ (80, 40, 52), Area=3.2168, Ratio of new/orig=0.544, vals(means) = 115.3 (125.8)  
17793 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
181 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.138 mm @ (79, 44, 52), Area=1.8345, Ratio of new/orig=0.310, vals(means) = 112.4 (127.8)  
17940 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
181 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.064 mm @ (79, 44, 52), Area=1.6669, Ratio of new/orig=0.282, vals(means) = 112.4 (127.8)  
18090 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.035 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=2.1952, Ratio of new/orig=0.372, vals(means) = 113.2 (125.6)  
18242 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.035 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=1.7753, Ratio of new/orig=0.300, vals(means) = 113.9 (127.1)  
18390 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
188 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.034 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=1.8176, Ratio of new/orig=0.308, vals(means) = 113.8 (127.1)  
18601 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
185 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (79, 46, 52), Area=1.8801, Ratio of new/orig=0.318, vals(means) = 116.4 (127.8)  
18815 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
180 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.378 mm @ (78, 41, 52), Area=2.4831, Ratio of new/orig=0.420, vals(means) = 113.7 (125.6)  
19027 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
183 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.086 mm @ (79, 43, 52), Area=2.7732, Ratio of new/orig=0.469, vals(means) = 112.8 (127.1)  
19231 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.298 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=1.1860, Ratio of new/orig=0.201, vals(means) = 113.8 (127.1)  
19440 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (78, 44, 52), Area=1.8444, Ratio of new/orig=0.312, vals(means) = 111.6 (127.8)  
19643 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.051 mm @ (78, 44, 52), Area=1.8357, Ratio of new/orig=0.311, vals(means) = 111.6 (127.8)  
19876 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.162 mm @ (81, 40, 52), Area=2.8080, Ratio of new/orig=0.475, vals(means) = 117.0 (125.8)  
20115 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
185 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.094 mm @ (79, 45, 52), Area=2.9885, Ratio of new/orig=0.506, vals(means) = 114.9 (127.8)  
20365 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
187 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (80, 44, 52), Area=1.8634, Ratio of new/orig=0.315, vals(means) = 115.4 (127.9)  
20620 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
186 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (79, 40, 52), Area=6.2670, Ratio of new/orig=1.061, vals(means) = 114.7 (125.6)  
20847 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
192 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.040 mm @ (79, 45, 52), Area=1.9594, Ratio of new/orig=0.332, vals(means) = 115.1 (127.8)  
21090 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
199 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.035 mm @ (79, 45, 52), Area=1.7956, Ratio of new/orig=0.304, vals(means) = 115.2 (127.8)  
21342 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
196 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (80, 41, 52), Area=1.8066, Ratio of new/orig=0.306, vals(means) = 116.5 (125.8)  
21600 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
196 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.041 mm @ (81, 42, 50), Area=2.1201, Ratio of new/orig=0.359, vals(means) = 117.8 (127.9)  
21862 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.023 mm @ (81, 42, 50), Area=1.9395, Ratio of new/orig=0.328, vals(means) = 117.8 (127.9)  
22118 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (81, 42, 50), Area=1.7940, Ratio of new/orig=0.304, vals(means) = 117.8 (127.9)  
22355 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
191 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (81, 42, 50), Area=1.7572, Ratio of new/orig=0.297, vals(means) = 117.7 (127.9)  
22587 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.032 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=2.6559, Ratio of new/orig=0.449, vals(means) = 113.4 (127.1)  
22852 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.048 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=1.8931, Ratio of new/orig=0.320, vals(means) = 115.2 (127.1)  
23103 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (80, 41, 51), Area=1.9373, Ratio of new/orig=0.328, vals(means) = 116.0 (126.6)  
23357 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=3.3488, Ratio of new/orig=0.567, vals(means) = 115.2 (127.1)  
23626 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (79, 42, 52), Area=3.8318, Ratio of new/orig=0.648, vals(means) = 115.3 (127.1)  
23869 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
198 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (79, 42, 51), Area=2.6397, Ratio of new/orig=0.447, vals(means) = 118.3 (127.9)  
24137 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
198 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (79, 42, 51), Area=2.6810, Ratio of new/orig=0.454, vals(means) = 118.5 (127.9)  
24400 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
198 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 42, 51), Area=2.6600, Ratio of new/orig=0.450, vals(means) = 118.6 (127.9)  
24642 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
201 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (80, 41, 51), Area=2.7532, Ratio of new/orig=0.466, vals(means) = 115.4 (126.6)  
24887 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (80, 41, 51), Area=2.8760, Ratio of new/orig=0.487, vals(means) = 115.3 (126.6)  
25133 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (81, 41, 51), Area=2.2945, Ratio of new/orig=0.388, vals(means) = 120.1 (126.6)  
25408 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
197 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (81, 41, 51), Area=2.3527, Ratio of new/orig=0.398, vals(means) = 120.1 (126.6)  
25659 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
200 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (81, 41, 51), Area=2.4144, Ratio of new/orig=0.409, vals(means) = 120.2 (126.6)  
25934 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
202 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (81, 41, 51), Area=2.4735, Ratio of new/orig=0.419, vals(means) = 120.3 (126.6)  
26178 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
202 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (79, 40, 52), Area=2.1995, Ratio of new/orig=0.372, vals(means) = 115.4 (125.6)  
26426 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
194 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=2.3893, Ratio of new/orig=0.404, vals(means) = 116.2 (127.1)  
26659 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
192 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=2.3847, Ratio of new/orig=0.404, vals(means) = 116.2 (127.1)  
26925 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
192 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (79, 46, 52), Area=2.5380, Ratio of new/orig=0.430, vals(means) = 116.7 (127.8)  
27182 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
189 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (79, 42, 50), Area=2.0626, Ratio of new/orig=0.349, vals(means) = 118.7 (127.9)  
27475 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (78, 42, 52), Area=2.4205, Ratio of new/orig=0.410, vals(means) = 116.1 (127.1)  
27709 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
196 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=2.2083, Ratio of new/orig=0.374, vals(means) = 114.0 (125.6)  
27977 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
193 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=2.2035, Ratio of new/orig=0.373, vals(means) = 113.9 (125.6)  
28222 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
193 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=2.1812, Ratio of new/orig=0.369, vals(means) = 113.8 (125.6)  
28462 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
188 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (77, 44, 52), Area=2.1260, Ratio of new/orig=0.360, vals(means) = 112.2 (126.9)  
28690 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
189 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (78, 42, 50), Area=2.2736, Ratio of new/orig=0.385, vals(means) = 118.0 (127.9)  
30136 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 9 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
192 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 35.577 mm @ (77, 39, 52), Area=2.3566, Ratio of new/orig=0.399, vals(means) = 112.6 (123.9)  
30149 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
192 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.508 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=2.8103, Ratio of new/orig=0.476, vals(means) = 114.4 (125.6)  
30176 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.561 mm @ (78, 41, 52), Area=2.8739, Ratio of new/orig=0.486, vals(means) = 115.9 (125.6)  
30211 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.236 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=1.5433, Ratio of new/orig=0.261, vals(means) = 114.2 (125.6)  
30232 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.166 mm @ (78, 40, 52), Area=1.3355, Ratio of new/orig=0.226, vals(means) = 114.1 (125.6)  
30283 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
195 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.292 mm @ (79, 41, 51), Area=2.8167, Ratio of new/orig=0.477, vals(means) = 116.4 (127.4)  
30347 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.986 mm @ (79, 41, 50), Area=1.5027, Ratio of new/orig=0.254, vals(means) = 117.5 (127.4)  
30441 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (79, 42, 50), Area=1.2504, Ratio of new/orig=0.212, vals(means) = 117.0 (127.9)  
30465 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.824 mm @ (80, 43, 50), Area=2.3540, Ratio of new/orig=0.398, vals(means) = 119.5 (127.9)  
30515 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.602 mm @ (81, 42, 50), Area=2.2060, Ratio of new/orig=0.373, vals(means) = 118.4 (127.9)  
30527 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.520 mm @ (80, 44, 49), Area=2.2088, Ratio of new/orig=0.374, vals(means) = 116.3 (129.8)  
30546 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
190 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.523 mm @ (81, 41, 50), Area=3.0218, Ratio of new/orig=0.511, vals(means) = 119.3 (126.6)  
30581 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 10 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
187 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.596 mm @ (81, 40, 51), Area=4.0921, Ratio of new/orig=0.693, vals(means) = 115.8 (126.6)  
30620 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
187 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.204 mm @ (79, 40, 51), Area=4.4333, Ratio of new/orig=0.750, vals(means) = 115.7 (127.4)  
30605 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.12
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
187 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.048 mm @ (80, 41, 49), Area=4.0257, Ratio of new/orig=0.681, vals(means) = 117.7 (128.1)  
30618 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
181 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.412 mm @ (82, 41, 49), Area=1.9123, Ratio of new/orig=0.324, vals(means) = 121.8 (126.8)  
30663 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
184 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.176 mm @ (82, 44, 49), Area=1.5044, Ratio of new/orig=0.255, vals(means) = 117.6 (132.2)  
30810 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
170 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.744 mm @ (82, 44, 49), Area=1.5028, Ratio of new/orig=0.254, vals(means) = 119.1 (132.2)  
30889 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 17 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
165 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.868 mm @ (81, 43, 49), Area=1.5223, Ratio of new/orig=0.258, vals(means) = 115.6 (129.3)  
30939 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 18 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
162 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.687 mm @ (82, 42, 49), Area=4.3472, Ratio of new/orig=0.736, vals(means) = 116.5 (129.5)  
30974 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 16 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
165 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.509 mm @ (84, 46, 49), Area=1.6994, Ratio of new/orig=0.288, vals(means) = 119.2 (135.4)  
31005 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 15 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
163 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.495 mm @ (83, 47, 49), Area=1.8127, Ratio of new/orig=0.307, vals(means) = 118.9 (134.0)  
31036 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.184 mm @ (85, 47, 49), Area=1.5901, Ratio of new/orig=0.269, vals(means) = 119.5 (135.4)  
31175 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 13 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.475 mm @ (85, 47, 49), Area=1.9024, Ratio of new/orig=0.322, vals(means) = 119.9 (135.4)  
31215 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.269 mm @ (84, 46, 49), Area=1.6562, Ratio of new/orig=0.280, vals(means) = 118.9 (135.4)  
31298 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 30 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.496 mm @ (84, 47, 50), Area=1.6855, Ratio of new/orig=0.285, vals(means) = 121.1 (135.6)  
31314 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 37 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.607 mm @ (84, 46, 48), Area=1.3580, Ratio of new/orig=0.230, vals(means) = 120.2 (135.4)  
31422 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 63 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
162 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.718 mm @ (85, 46, 50), Area=1.2083, Ratio of new/orig=0.204, vals(means) = 121.3 (135.6)  
31441 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 57 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
164 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.695 mm @ (84, 45, 48), Area=1.8524, Ratio of new/orig=0.313, vals(means) = 119.8 (133.5)  
31458 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 46 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
164 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.665 mm @ (85, 47, 50), Area=0.5394, Ratio of new/orig=0.091, vals(means) = 120.9 (135.6)  
31503 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 59 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
170 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.694 mm @ (87, 47, 49), Area=1.6305, Ratio of new/orig=0.276, vals(means) = 118.2 (134.9)  
31595 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 82 more than 0.25, 6 more than .1
168 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.894 mm @ (82, 47, 48), Area=0.3760, Ratio of new/orig=0.064, vals(means) = 119.0 (134.0)  
31666 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 69 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
165 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.677 mm @ (86, 46, 49), Area=2.1534, Ratio of new/orig=0.364, vals(means) = 124.6 (134.9)  
31691 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 64 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
170 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.362 mm @ (86, 48, 50), Area=3.0478, Ratio of new/orig=0.516, vals(means) = 118.7 (135.3)  
31776 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 86 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
165 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.989 mm @ (86, 44, 48), Area=1.1123, Ratio of new/orig=0.188, vals(means) = 122.7 (133.3)  
31800 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 79 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
165 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.572 mm @ (86, 48, 49), Area=2.9483, Ratio of new/orig=0.499, vals(means) = 114.2 (131.6)  
31836 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 64 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
162 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.473 mm @ (85, 48, 48), Area=2.2715, Ratio of new/orig=0.384, vals(means) = 119.6 (140.9)  
31879 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 42 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
162 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.312 mm @ (84, 47, 48), Area=1.6017, Ratio of new/orig=0.271, vals(means) = 121.5 (135.4)  
32014 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 83 more than 0.25, 5 more than .1
164 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.556 mm @ (86, 45, 48), Area=1.8107, Ratio of new/orig=0.306, vals(means) = 124.9 (133.3)  
32042 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 92 more than 0.25, 5 more than .1
pct change decreased
161 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.674 mm @ (79, 45, 49), Area=0.3821, Ratio of new/orig=0.065, vals(means) = 116.0 (130.0)  
32092 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 107 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
159 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.680 mm @ (79, 46, 49), Area=1.0222, Ratio of new/orig=0.173, vals(means) = 117.9 (131.4)  
32141 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 108 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
159 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.540 mm @ (81, 47, 49), Area=5.5442, Ratio of new/orig=0.938, vals(means) = 120.3 (131.2)  
32183 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 90 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
159 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.598 mm @ (79, 41, 49), Area=1.8678, Ratio of new/orig=0.316, vals(means) = 117.8 (127.5)  
32244 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 92 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
159 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.593 mm @ (79, 41, 49), Area=1.7465, Ratio of new/orig=0.296, vals(means) = 117.5 (127.5)  
32266 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 86 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.220 mm @ (79, 40, 48), Area=1.6384, Ratio of new/orig=0.277, vals(means) = 114.2 (127.5)  
32429 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 109 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.804 mm @ (79, 42, 47), Area=0.3702, Ratio of new/orig=0.063, vals(means) = 113.9 (130.1)  
32490 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 108 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
151 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.590 mm @ (79, 41, 49), Area=1.9085, Ratio of new/orig=0.323, vals(means) = 118.3 (127.5)  
32529 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 104 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
152 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.505 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.7932, Ratio of new/orig=0.303, vals(means) = 116.7 (129.5)  
32573 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 108 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.679 mm @ (76, 42, 49), Area=1.7183, Ratio of new/orig=0.291, vals(means) = 111.6 (129.5)  
32613 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 105 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
152 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.418 mm @ (78, 42, 49), Area=1.9431, Ratio of new/orig=0.329, vals(means) = 122.4 (129.0)  
32670 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 111 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
149 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.291 mm @ (77, 42, 48), Area=1.6344, Ratio of new/orig=0.277, vals(means) = 113.6 (129.5)  
32702 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 115 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
149 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.281 mm @ (77, 43, 49), Area=1.6306, Ratio of new/orig=0.276, vals(means) = 117.3 (129.5)  
32843 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 143 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
152 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.353 mm @ (77, 39, 49), Area=2.2513, Ratio of new/orig=0.381, vals(means) = 114.3 (128.9)  
32884 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 152 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
152 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.682 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=2.2766, Ratio of new/orig=0.385, vals(means) = 118.9 (129.0)  
32919 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 159 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.674 mm @ (80, 42, 50), Area=3.4740, Ratio of new/orig=0.588, vals(means) = 117.6 (127.9)  
33010 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 179 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
155 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.324 mm @ (80, 43, 51), Area=2.7393, Ratio of new/orig=0.464, vals(means) = 118.5 (127.9)  
32999 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 159 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.334 mm @ (78, 42, 47), Area=1.4936, Ratio of new/orig=0.253, vals(means) = 113.2 (130.1)  
33066 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 162 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.343 mm @ (80, 43, 51), Area=2.9630, Ratio of new/orig=0.501, vals(means) = 118.6 (127.9)  
33074 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 153 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
158 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.330 mm @ (78, 43, 48), Area=1.6889, Ratio of new/orig=0.286, vals(means) = 116.2 (129.0)  
33140 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 154 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
149 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.104 mm @ (76, 43, 49), Area=1.3413, Ratio of new/orig=0.227, vals(means) = 112.1 (129.5)  
33240 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 159 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
149 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.117 mm @ (77, 42, 49), Area=5.5746, Ratio of new/orig=0.943, vals(means) = 115.5 (129.5)  
33345 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 160 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
157 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.150 mm @ (78, 42, 48), Area=6.4879, Ratio of new/orig=1.098, vals(means) = 114.5 (129.0)  
33454 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 171 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
157 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.256 mm @ (76, 42, 49), Area=1.7173, Ratio of new/orig=0.291, vals(means) = 111.7 (129.5)  
33573 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 171 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
157 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.315 mm @ (77, 42, 49), Area=1.1035, Ratio of new/orig=0.187, vals(means) = 114.7 (129.5)  
33526 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 163 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
160 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.087 mm @ (78, 42, 48), Area=6.1516, Ratio of new/orig=1.041, vals(means) = 115.0 (129.0)  
33590 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 161 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
159 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.068 mm @ (77, 41, 49), Area=1.4608, Ratio of new/orig=0.247, vals(means) = 113.9 (128.8)  
33670 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 169 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
154 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.123 mm @ (77, 41, 49), Area=1.5275, Ratio of new/orig=0.259, vals(means) = 114.2 (128.8)  
33791 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 168 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
148 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.047 mm @ (77, 41, 49), Area=1.9506, Ratio of new/orig=0.330, vals(means) = 114.5 (128.8)  
33923 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 181 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
145 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.040 mm @ (79, 47, 48), Area=1.8479, Ratio of new/orig=0.313, vals(means) = 115.3 (131.4)  
34077 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 185 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
148 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (77, 40, 49), Area=2.6794, Ratio of new/orig=0.453, vals(means) = 112.0 (128.8)  
34245 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 193 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
145 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.038 mm @ (78, 42, 48), Area=1.5603, Ratio of new/orig=0.264, vals(means) = 117.1 (129.0)  
34410 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 198 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.042 mm @ (77, 41, 47), Area=2.0153, Ratio of new/orig=0.341, vals(means) = 113.4 (130.0)  
34615 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 206 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
146 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.046 mm @ (77, 41, 47), Area=2.0465, Ratio of new/orig=0.346, vals(means) = 113.3 (130.0)  
34846 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 214 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
147 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.038 mm @ (77, 42, 50), Area=1.8233, Ratio of new/orig=0.309, vals(means) = 121.2 (128.4)  
35082 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 211 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
145 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (78, 42, 48), Area=2.2857, Ratio of new/orig=0.387, vals(means) = 117.3 (129.0)  
35311 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 225 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
138 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (75, 45, 49), Area=1.9481, Ratio of new/orig=0.330, vals(means) = 116.1 (130.5)  
35552 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 238 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
144 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.035 mm @ (77, 41, 47), Area=1.6660, Ratio of new/orig=0.282, vals(means) = 113.1 (130.0)  
35814 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 246 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (77, 43, 48), Area=1.7872, Ratio of new/orig=0.302, vals(means) = 114.2 (129.5)  
36089 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 265 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.6466, Ratio of new/orig=0.279, vals(means) = 113.4 (129.5)  
36375 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 292 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
135 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.029 mm @ (77, 43, 47), Area=1.5083, Ratio of new/orig=0.255, vals(means) = 113.1 (130.4)  
36670 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 303 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
132 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.024 mm @ (77, 43, 47), Area=1.6180, Ratio of new/orig=0.274, vals(means) = 113.1 (130.4)  
36930 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 312 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
129 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (76, 43, 49), Area=1.9202, Ratio of new/orig=0.325, vals(means) = 116.8 (129.5)  
37239 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 323 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
131 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (76, 43, 49), Area=1.9199, Ratio of new/orig=0.325, vals(means) = 116.9 (129.5)  
37537 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 332 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
134 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (78, 47, 47), Area=1.6587, Ratio of new/orig=0.281, vals(means) = 116.7 (131.6)  
37843 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 343 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (78, 47, 47), Area=1.7222, Ratio of new/orig=0.291, vals(means) = 116.8 (131.6)  
38149 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 354 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (78, 47, 47), Area=1.8034, Ratio of new/orig=0.305, vals(means) = 116.9 (131.6)  
38487 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 365 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
133 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.023 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.9504, Ratio of new/orig=0.330, vals(means) = 113.7 (129.5)  
38835 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 370 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
135 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.9401, Ratio of new/orig=0.328, vals(means) = 113.8 (129.5)  
39168 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 375 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
140 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (77, 43, 47), Area=1.8845, Ratio of new/orig=0.319, vals(means) = 113.3 (130.4)  
39517 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 383 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
140 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (77, 43, 47), Area=1.9758, Ratio of new/orig=0.334, vals(means) = 113.4 (130.4)  
39813 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 393 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
135 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.8450, Ratio of new/orig=0.312, vals(means) = 114.2 (129.5)  
40120 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 396 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
144 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (76, 43, 48), Area=1.8632, Ratio of new/orig=0.315, vals(means) = 114.4 (129.5)  
40474 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 399 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
144 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (78, 46, 46), Area=1.7841, Ratio of new/orig=0.302, vals(means) = 114.6 (131.6)  
40858 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 401 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
144 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (80, 47, 55), Area=2.3441, Ratio of new/orig=0.397, vals(means) = 117.5 (127.5)  
41189 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
146 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (80, 47, 55), Area=2.3493, Ratio of new/orig=0.398, vals(means) = 117.0 (127.5)  
41525 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 407 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
146 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (78, 44, 45), Area=1.8217, Ratio of new/orig=0.308, vals(means) = 117.1 (131.3)  
41874 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 407 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
139 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (76, 43, 47), Area=2.0495, Ratio of new/orig=0.347, vals(means) = 113.9 (130.4)  
42177 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 409 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
145 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 46, 45), Area=1.7103, Ratio of new/orig=0.289, vals(means) = 119.2 (131.7)  
42539 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 409 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
145 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 46, 45), Area=1.7540, Ratio of new/orig=0.297, vals(means) = 119.3 (131.7)  
42896 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 409 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 45, 44), Area=1.6571, Ratio of new/orig=0.280, vals(means) = 120.0 (131.3)  
43227 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 408 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
140 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 45, 44), Area=1.6929, Ratio of new/orig=0.287, vals(means) = 120.0 (131.3)  
43551 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 405 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 45, 44), Area=1.7296, Ratio of new/orig=0.293, vals(means) = 119.9 (131.3)  
43876 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 401 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 45, 44), Area=1.7722, Ratio of new/orig=0.300, vals(means) = 119.9 (131.3)  
44204 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (80, 48, 57), Area=2.0676, Ratio of new/orig=0.350, vals(means) = 121.3 (127.9)  
44537 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
140 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (80, 48, 57), Area=2.1095, Ratio of new/orig=0.357, vals(means) = 121.4 (127.9)  
44868 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
131 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (80, 43, 58), Area=1.9125, Ratio of new/orig=0.324, vals(means) = 117.0 (125.6)  
45150 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
137 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (78, 45, 44), Area=1.6784, Ratio of new/orig=0.284, vals(means) = 120.9 (131.3)  
45458 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 401 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
139 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (78, 45, 44), Area=1.6897, Ratio of new/orig=0.286, vals(means) = 120.8 (131.3)  
45752 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 405 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
134 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.5499, Ratio of new/orig=0.262, vals(means) = 117.2 (142.2)  
46035 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 401 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.5815, Ratio of new/orig=0.268, vals(means) = 117.3 (142.2)  
46319 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 403 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
143 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.6216, Ratio of new/orig=0.274, vals(means) = 117.4 (142.2)  
46618 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 405 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
138 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.6702, Ratio of new/orig=0.283, vals(means) = 117.5 (142.2)  
46882 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 406 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
136 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.7263, Ratio of new/orig=0.292, vals(means) = 117.5 (142.2)  
47142 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 406 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
133 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.7885, Ratio of new/orig=0.303, vals(means) = 117.6 (142.2)  
47402 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 408 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
134 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (79, 46, 43), Area=1.8547, Ratio of new/orig=0.314, vals(means) = 117.7 (142.2)  
47684 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 412 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
137 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.6498, Ratio of new/orig=0.279, vals(means) = 117.4 (130.8)  
47965 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 414 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
134 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.6924, Ratio of new/orig=0.286, vals(means) = 117.5 (130.8)  
48232 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 417 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
132 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.7444, Ratio of new/orig=0.295, vals(means) = 117.6 (130.8)  
48494 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 422 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
130 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.8033, Ratio of new/orig=0.305, vals(means) = 117.7 (130.8)  
48762 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 421 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
132 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.8661, Ratio of new/orig=0.316, vals(means) = 117.8 (130.8)  
49031 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 418 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
132 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.9297, Ratio of new/orig=0.327, vals(means) = 117.9 (130.8)  
49269 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 421 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
129 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=1.9917, Ratio of new/orig=0.337, vals(means) = 118.0 (130.8)  
49521 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 421 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
129 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.5778, Ratio of new/orig=0.267, vals(means) = 120.6 (139.8)  
49750 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 418 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
129 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.6008, Ratio of new/orig=0.271, vals(means) = 120.6 (139.8)  
49948 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 418 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
128 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.6284, Ratio of new/orig=0.276, vals(means) = 120.5 (139.8)  
50149 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 420 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
125 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.6611, Ratio of new/orig=0.281, vals(means) = 120.5 (139.8)  
50367 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 422 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
125 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.6992, Ratio of new/orig=0.288, vals(means) = 120.5 (139.8)  
50584 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 426 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
128 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.7426, Ratio of new/orig=0.295, vals(means) = 120.5 (139.8)  
50820 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 426 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
122 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.7912, Ratio of new/orig=0.303, vals(means) = 120.3 (139.8)  
50999 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 425 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
128 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (79, 45, 41), Area=1.8448, Ratio of new/orig=0.312, vals(means) = 120.3 (139.8)  
51208 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 428 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
125 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.6419, Ratio of new/orig=0.278, vals(means) = 117.3 (139.8)  
51399 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 431 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
125 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.6868, Ratio of new/orig=0.285, vals(means) = 117.2 (139.8)  
51593 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 433 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
120 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.7378, Ratio of new/orig=0.294, vals(means) = 117.1 (139.8)  
51780 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 433 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
117 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.7933, Ratio of new/orig=0.304, vals(means) = 117.3 (139.8)  
51996 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 439 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
120 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.8514, Ratio of new/orig=0.313, vals(means) = 117.7 (139.8)  
52208 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 441 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
120 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.9101, Ratio of new/orig=0.323, vals(means) = 118.2 (139.8)  
52395 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 443 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
117 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=1.9680, Ratio of new/orig=0.333, vals(means) = 118.6 (139.8)  
52563 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 444 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
117 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (78, 45, 40), Area=2.0246, Ratio of new/orig=0.343, vals(means) = 119.1 (139.8)  
52736 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 446 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
115 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.7059, Ratio of new/orig=0.289, vals(means) = 118.4 (134.5)  
52918 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 447 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
115 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.7444, Ratio of new/orig=0.295, vals(means) = 118.4 (134.5)  
53081 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 448 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
110 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.7870, Ratio of new/orig=0.302, vals(means) = 118.4 (134.5)  
53231 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 448 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
110 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.8325, Ratio of new/orig=0.310, vals(means) = 118.6 (134.5)  
53377 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 449 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
110 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.8796, Ratio of new/orig=0.318, vals(means) = 118.7 (134.5)  
53536 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 450 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
110 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.9265, Ratio of new/orig=0.326, vals(means) = 118.9 (134.5)  
53698 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 451 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
113 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=1.9716, Ratio of new/orig=0.334, vals(means) = 119.1 (134.5)  
53823 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 452 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
113 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (77, 45, 39), Area=2.0139, Ratio of new/orig=0.341, vals(means) = 119.3 (134.5)  
53981 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 454 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
107 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (78, 44, 39), Area=1.9327, Ratio of new/orig=0.327, vals(means) = 122.2 (143.4)  
54123 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 454 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
104 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (81, 46, 38), Area=1.6876, Ratio of new/orig=0.286, vals(means) = 116.3 (136.4)  
54259 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 455 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
104 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (81, 46, 38), Area=1.7253, Ratio of new/orig=0.292, vals(means) = 116.1 (136.4)  
54417 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 456 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
107 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (81, 46, 38), Area=1.7713, Ratio of new/orig=0.300, vals(means) = 116.2 (136.4)  
54538 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 456 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
107 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (81, 46, 38), Area=1.8244, Ratio of new/orig=0.309, vals(means) = 116.3 (136.4)  
54654 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 454 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
110 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (81, 46, 38), Area=1.8826, Ratio of new/orig=0.319, vals(means) = 116.4 (136.4)  
54789 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 454 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
98 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (78, 44, 39), Area=2.2224, Ratio of new/orig=0.376, vals(means) = 120.7 (143.4)  
54888 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 462 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
107 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (82, 47, 38), Area=1.9415, Ratio of new/orig=0.329, vals(means) = 119.7 (135.7)  
55011 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 459 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
104 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (82, 47, 38), Area=1.9711, Ratio of new/orig=0.334, vals(means) = 120.4 (135.7)  
55118 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 458 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
101 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (82, 47, 38), Area=2.0040, Ratio of new/orig=0.339, vals(means) = 120.4 (135.7)  
55231 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 458 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
104 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (47, 47, 44), Area=1.7393, Ratio of new/orig=0.294, vals(means) = 117.9 (130.9)  
55324 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 455 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
107 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (47, 47, 44), Area=1.7608, Ratio of new/orig=0.298, vals(means) = 117.8 (130.9)  
55467 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 455 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
108 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (80, 46, 39), Area=3.4752, Ratio of new/orig=0.588, vals(means) = 118.9 (136.4)  
55549 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 453 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
99 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (80, 46, 39), Area=3.6641, Ratio of new/orig=0.620, vals(means) = 118.9 (136.4)  
55759 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 442 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.700 mm @ (79, 47, 40), Area=2.4358, Ratio of new/orig=0.412, vals(means) = 118.4 (148.1)  
55802 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 440 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.067 mm @ (79, 48, 41), Area=2.6799, Ratio of new/orig=0.454, vals(means) = 120.1 (132.6)  
55850 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 475 more than 0.25, 22 more than .1
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.649 mm @ (80, 47, 42), Area=2.7765, Ratio of new/orig=0.470, vals(means) = 119.7 (142.9)  
55846 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 431 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.258 mm @ (79, 49, 41), Area=1.7936, Ratio of new/orig=0.304, vals(means) = 115.3 (132.6)  
55836 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 425 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
105 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.321 mm @ (78, 47, 41), Area=2.5625, Ratio of new/orig=0.434, vals(means) = 122.5 (148.1)  
55854 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 421 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
102 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.125 mm @ (79, 48, 39), Area=2.7613, Ratio of new/orig=0.467, vals(means) = 120.7 (131.5)  
55871 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 415 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
105 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.225 mm @ (78, 46, 42), Area=1.9085, Ratio of new/orig=0.323, vals(means) = 119.1 (142.2)  
55903 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 414 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
105 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.132 mm @ (80, 48, 40), Area=3.2630, Ratio of new/orig=0.552, vals(means) = 118.1 (133.0)  
55927 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 407 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
106 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.233 mm @ (78, 47, 42), Area=2.9577, Ratio of new/orig=0.501, vals(means) = 119.5 (142.2)  
55952 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 402 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
109 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.050 mm @ (76, 47, 42), Area=2.2164, Ratio of new/orig=0.375, vals(means) = 110.2 (131.5)  
55979 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 398 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
94 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.205 mm @ (78, 47, 42), Area=4.2226, Ratio of new/orig=0.715, vals(means) = 120.9 (142.2)  
55986 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 396 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
94 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.042 mm @ (79, 46, 42), Area=3.4055, Ratio of new/orig=0.576, vals(means) = 118.1 (142.2)  
55925 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 365 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
97 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.651 mm @ (78, 47, 41), Area=0.8568, Ratio of new/orig=0.145, vals(means) = 119.6 (148.1)  
55856 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 333 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
100 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.644 mm @ (77, 48, 41), Area=1.9946, Ratio of new/orig=0.338, vals(means) = 110.6 (131.6)  
55774 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 306 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
100 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.699 mm @ (78, 47, 43), Area=5.5918, Ratio of new/orig=0.946, vals(means) = 117.8 (142.2)  
55665 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 258 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
100 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.290 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=7.9608, Ratio of new/orig=1.347, vals(means) = 121.8 (130.8)  
55684 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 266 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
103 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.285 mm @ (78, 48, 40), Area=1.0601, Ratio of new/orig=0.179, vals(means) = 115.4 (132.6)  
55601 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 234 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.40
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
103 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (78, 45, 43), Area=7.7564, Ratio of new/orig=1.313, vals(means) = 122.0 (130.8)  
54296 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 320 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
101 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.625 mm @ (78, 46, 44), Area=3.3576, Ratio of new/orig=0.568, vals(means) = 120.4 (131.7)  
53555 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 372 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
95 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.456 mm @ (79, 45, 44), Area=17.7619, Ratio of new/orig=3.006, vals(means) = 119.3 (131.3)  
53210 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 382 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
95 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.135 mm @ (81, 45, 44), Area=2.6700, Ratio of new/orig=0.452, vals(means) = 120.8 (139.6)  
52858 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 397 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
101 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.034 mm @ (71, 49, 32), Area=13.0669, Ratio of new/orig=2.211, vals(means) = 107.9 (113.5)  
52193 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 424 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.268 mm @ (81, 45, 44), Area=3.0018, Ratio of new/orig=0.508, vals(means) = 120.3 (139.6)  
51278 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 458 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.089 mm @ (80, 47, 44), Area=4.2286, Ratio of new/orig=0.716, vals(means) = 121.3 (132.8)  
50002 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 505 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.152 mm @ (81, 44, 44), Area=1.4249, Ratio of new/orig=0.241, vals(means) = 118.6 (139.6)  
48294 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 568 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
93 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.036 mm @ (80, 45, 43), Area=2.5767, Ratio of new/orig=0.436, vals(means) = 120.2 (127.4)  
46371 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 634 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.109 mm @ (81, 44, 45), Area=1.5751, Ratio of new/orig=0.267, vals(means) = 120.0 (139.6)  
44147 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 702 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (71, 49, 32), Area=12.7473, Ratio of new/orig=2.157, vals(means) = 99.5 (113.5)  
41895 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 786 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.061 mm @ (81, 43, 45), Area=2.5922, Ratio of new/orig=0.439, vals(means) = 122.0 (125.9)  
39659 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 852 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
97 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (74, 68, 46), Area=6.1444, Ratio of new/orig=1.040, vals(means) = 100.5 (129.4)  
37601 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 910 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.052 mm @ (81, 45, 44), Area=2.5703, Ratio of new/orig=0.435, vals(means) = 119.8 (139.6)  
35678 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 942 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (52, 84, 38), Area=1.2555, Ratio of new/orig=0.212, vals(means) = 115.1 (119.1)  
34010 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 953 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (53, 82, 38), Area=1.3214, Ratio of new/orig=0.224, vals(means) = 108.1 (120.7)  
32551 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 924 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (53, 82, 38), Area=1.3651, Ratio of new/orig=0.231, vals(means) = 108.2 (120.7)  
31336 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 877 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
95 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (53, 82, 38), Area=1.4143, Ratio of new/orig=0.239, vals(means) = 108.4 (120.7)  
30242 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 808 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
95 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (53, 82, 37), Area=1.2707, Ratio of new/orig=0.215, vals(means) = 112.8 (120.3)  
29401 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 722 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
91 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.029 mm @ (53, 82, 37), Area=1.3264, Ratio of new/orig=0.224, vals(means) = 112.6 (120.3)  
28609 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 630 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (53, 82, 37), Area=1.4036, Ratio of new/orig=0.238, vals(means) = 111.9 (120.3)  
27940 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 552 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
94 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.024 mm @ (53, 82, 37), Area=1.5064, Ratio of new/orig=0.255, vals(means) = 111.0 (120.3)  
27420 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 464 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (51, 71, 49), Area=6.2215, Ratio of new/orig=1.053, vals(means) = 108.2 (125.2)  
26990 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 397 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.032 mm @ (51, 71, 48), Area=5.3466, Ratio of new/orig=0.905, vals(means) = 106.9 (125.2)  
26558 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 337 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.036 mm @ (51, 71, 48), Area=5.3384, Ratio of new/orig=0.903, vals(means) = 106.9 (125.2)  
26225 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 270 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (79, 69, 47), Area=6.1743, Ratio of new/orig=1.045, vals(means) = 111.6 (108.7)  
25947 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 223 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
91 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.032 mm @ (78, 68, 46), Area=6.2998, Ratio of new/orig=1.066, vals(means) = 101.2 (108.7)  
25717 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 188 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.024 mm @ (78, 68, 46), Area=6.2927, Ratio of new/orig=1.065, vals(means) = 101.2 (108.7)  
25532 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 163 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
88 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (76, 67, 45), Area=5.2346, Ratio of new/orig=0.886, vals(means) = 101.1 (113.0)  
25355 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 142 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (52, 69, 47), Area=4.8246, Ratio of new/orig=0.817, vals(means) = 112.2 (125.7)  
25173 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 119 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (52, 69, 47), Area=4.7843, Ratio of new/orig=0.810, vals(means) = 112.6 (125.7)  
25006 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 103 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (79, 71, 50), Area=6.6869, Ratio of new/orig=1.132, vals(means) = 99.4 (88.6)  
24875 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 81 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (47, 78, 57), Area=6.8482, Ratio of new/orig=1.159, vals(means) = 107.2 (98.8)  
24739 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 67 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (49, 72, 49), Area=6.1433, Ratio of new/orig=1.040, vals(means) = 105.4 (104.9)  
24561 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 55 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (78, 66, 44), Area=6.1308, Ratio of new/orig=1.038, vals(means) = 96.8 (115.3)  
24424 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 49 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (53, 68, 46), Area=4.1809, Ratio of new/orig=0.708, vals(means) = 109.8 (125.7)  
24310 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 35 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.023 mm @ (53, 67, 46), Area=5.5696, Ratio of new/orig=0.943, vals(means) = 115.5 (111.6)  
24198 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 29 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (48, 78, 57), Area=6.6138, Ratio of new/orig=1.119, vals(means) = 104.3 (101.7)  
24076 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 19 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
93 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (53, 68, 46), Area=4.2056, Ratio of new/orig=0.712, vals(means) = 112.4 (125.7)  
23952 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 16 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
96 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (75, 78, 57), Area=7.2444, Ratio of new/orig=1.226, vals(means) = 91.3 (107.1)  
23820 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 13 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.019 mm @ (47, 78, 57), Area=7.0603, Ratio of new/orig=1.195, vals(means) = 107.4 (98.8)  
23698 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 13 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.029 mm @ (48, 73, 50), Area=6.5637, Ratio of new/orig=1.111, vals(means) = 102.9 (103.4)  
23576 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
91 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (49, 73, 50), Area=6.0549, Ratio of new/orig=1.025, vals(means) = 102.4 (103.4)  
23441 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 9 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
88 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.031 mm @ (48, 78, 56), Area=6.6636, Ratio of new/orig=1.128, vals(means) = 103.6 (101.7)  
23300 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 8 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
88 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.041 mm @ (49, 78, 56), Area=5.9540, Ratio of new/orig=1.008, vals(means) = 103.8 (101.7)  
23158 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 8 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (77, 65, 44), Area=4.8612, Ratio of new/orig=0.823, vals(means) = 98.5 (108.8)  
23014 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
84 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (49, 78, 56), Area=5.9590, Ratio of new/orig=1.009, vals(means) = 104.1 (101.7)  
22902 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.019 mm @ (47, 78, 57), Area=7.0763, Ratio of new/orig=1.198, vals(means) = 107.4 (98.8)  
22783 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (49, 78, 56), Area=5.9465, Ratio of new/orig=1.006, vals(means) = 104.4 (101.7)  
22640 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
84 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (48, 70, 47), Area=7.9042, Ratio of new/orig=1.338, vals(means) = 110.4 (105.4)  
22518 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
84 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (47, 75, 53), Area=9.7053, Ratio of new/orig=1.643, vals(means) = 99.7 (97.2)  
22411 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
83 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.019 mm @ (47, 72, 49), Area=7.0483, Ratio of new/orig=1.193, vals(means) = 101.8 (101.3)  
22271 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (55, 65, 45), Area=7.0399, Ratio of new/orig=1.191, vals(means) = 117.2 (124.1)  
22151 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (48, 75, 53), Area=10.0095, Ratio of new/orig=1.694, vals(means) = 99.6 (90.7)  
22042 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
91 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (47, 70, 47), Area=8.2056, Ratio of new/orig=1.389, vals(means) = 107.4 (106.9)  
21930 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
88 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.031 mm @ (48, 70, 47), Area=8.1282, Ratio of new/orig=1.376, vals(means) = 111.3 (105.4)  
21831 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
91 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (48, 70, 47), Area=8.1717, Ratio of new/orig=1.383, vals(means) = 111.4 (105.4)  
21693 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
93 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (48, 70, 47), Area=8.2115, Ratio of new/orig=1.390, vals(means) = 111.6 (105.4)  
21077 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 19.702 mm @ (52, 84, 37), Area=3.4788, Ratio of new/orig=0.589, vals(means) = 107.2 (118.8)  
21073 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
84 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.259 mm @ (52, 84, 35), Area=2.1417, Ratio of new/orig=0.362, vals(means) = 117.3 (117.6)  
21067 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.060 mm @ (52, 84, 35), Area=1.8027, Ratio of new/orig=0.305, vals(means) = 117.0 (117.6)  
21058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.305 mm @ (51, 83, 35), Area=2.0973, Ratio of new/orig=0.355, vals(means) = 116.2 (125.3)  
21026 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (47, 77, 55), Area=7.5774, Ratio of new/orig=1.282, vals(means) = 94.5 (95.7)  
21004 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (53, 84, 36), Area=3.1972, Ratio of new/orig=0.541, vals(means) = 114.3 (118.8)  
20977 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
86 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (47, 77, 56), Area=7.2151, Ratio of new/orig=1.221, vals(means) = 87.0 (96.4)  
20954 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
86 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (52, 82, 35), Area=1.5353, Ratio of new/orig=0.260, vals(means) = 116.8 (118.2)  
20933 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.056 mm @ (52, 84, 37), Area=2.6793, Ratio of new/orig=0.453, vals(means) = 107.6 (118.8)  
20837 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
94 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 2.746 mm @ (52, 84, 38), Area=0.4547, Ratio of new/orig=0.077, vals(means) = 109.1 (119.1)  
20749 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
92 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.059 mm @ (52, 84, 38), Area=9.9617, Ratio of new/orig=1.686, vals(means) = 113.3 (119.1)  
20339 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
93 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.759 mm @ (53, 84, 39), Area=6.8841, Ratio of new/orig=1.165, vals(means) = 103.2 (119.1)  
19863 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
95 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.119 mm @ (63, 32, 71), Area=7.1879, Ratio of new/orig=1.216, vals(means) = 110.0 (30.3)  
19377 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
90 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.120 mm @ (49, 70, 47), Area=7.6105, Ratio of new/orig=1.288, vals(means) = 107.0 (105.4)  
18925 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
89 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.108 mm @ (63, 33, 71), Area=10.3528, Ratio of new/orig=1.752, vals(means) = 89.3 (30.3)  
18058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.110 mm @ (63, 32, 71), Area=7.4945, Ratio of new/orig=1.268, vals(means) = 109.6 (30.3)  
16643 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
setting smoothness coefficient to 1.00
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (81, 71, 50), Area=7.7173, Ratio of new/orig=1.306, vals(means) = 103.4 (100.3)  
18058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.045 mm @ (63, 32, 71), Area=7.4945, Ratio of new/orig=1.268, vals(means) = 109.6 (30.3)  
18058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.090 mm @ (63, 32, 71), Area=7.4945, Ratio of new/orig=1.268, vals(means) = 109.6 (30.3)  
17681 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness coefficient to 2.00
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
87 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 0.050 mm @ (49, 77, 53), Area=4.7350, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 109.0 (107.8)  
165 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
83 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 30.908 mm @ (78, 47, 40), Area=10.8506, Ratio of new/orig=0.977, vals(means) = 114.6 (148.1)  
165 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
83 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.207 mm @ (78, 47, 40), Area=10.8506, Ratio of new/orig=0.977, vals(means) = 114.6 (148.1)  
105 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 6 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
83 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.208 mm @ (78, 47, 40), Area=10.8506, Ratio of new/orig=0.977, vals(means) = 114.6 (148.1)  
165 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
83 inconsistent label nodes removed...
	max gradient 1.208 mm @ (78, 47, 40), Area=10.8506, Ratio of new/orig=0.977, vals(means) = 114.6 (148.1)  
101 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 6 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
***************** morphing with label term set to 0 *******************************
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
**************** pass 1 of 1 ************************
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.01
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.049 mm @ (79, 47, 36), Area=4.3961, Ratio of new/orig=1.445, vals(means) = 120.7 (135.2)  
155 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.049 mm @ (79, 47, 36), Area=4.3961, Ratio of new/orig=1.445, vals(means) = 120.7 (135.2)  
155 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
	max gradient 0.271 mm @ (83, 46, 45), Area=2.3121, Ratio of new/orig=0.684, vals(means) = 119.3 (134.6)  
147 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.481 mm @ (60, 52, 54), Area=1.6453, Ratio of new/orig=0.694, vals(means) = 67.8 (26.8)  
143 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	max gradient 0.505 mm @ (82, 71, 53), Area=1.3970, Ratio of new/orig=0.429, vals(means) = 101.2 (86.4)  
133 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
	max gradient 1.340 mm @ (78, 46, 40), Area=0.4739, Ratio of new/orig=0.167, vals(means) = 116.8 (148.1)  
126 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (78, 47, 40), Area=9.3423, Ratio of new/orig=0.841, vals(means) = 114.6 (148.1)  
120 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.498 mm @ (59, 52, 55), Area=2.0321, Ratio of new/orig=0.850, vals(means) = 47.3 (26.7)  
114 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.479 mm @ (58, 52, 56), Area=1.3238, Ratio of new/orig=0.552, vals(means) = 45.9 (29.2)  
112 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.474 mm @ (82, 70, 52), Area=2.6941, Ratio of new/orig=0.858, vals(means) = 99.3 (86.4)  
111 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.058 mm @ (58, 53, 57), Area=6.3627, Ratio of new/orig=0.970, vals(means) = 55.2 (29.2)  
96 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.067 mm @ (58, 53, 57), Area=6.3759, Ratio of new/orig=0.972, vals(means) = 57.4 (29.2)  
84 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
	max gradient 0.478 mm @ (60, 53, 55), Area=2.0128, Ratio of new/orig=0.512, vals(means) = 67.5 (26.8)  
64 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.455 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=1.2064, Ratio of new/orig=0.544, vals(means) = 47.0 (23.7)  
53 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.03
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.031 mm @ (59, 51, 55), Area=0.3725, Ratio of new/orig=0.176, vals(means) = 48.2 (23.7)  
53 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.851 mm @ (60, 51, 56), Area=5.0172, Ratio of new/orig=2.416, vals(means) = 50.6 (28.5)  
53 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.756 mm @ (60, 51, 55), Area=1.4397, Ratio of new/orig=0.699, vals(means) = 55.4 (36.9)  
49 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.822 mm @ (61, 50, 56), Area=14.4625, Ratio of new/orig=1.278, vals(means) = 70.5 (28.5)  
45 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.781 mm @ (61, 53, 56), Area=3.9553, Ratio of new/orig=0.672, vals(means) = 84.6 (28.5)  
42 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 4 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.095 mm @ (60, 54, 56), Area=15.3083, Ratio of new/orig=1.125, vals(means) = 89.8 (59.3)  
41 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.293 mm @ (60, 53, 56), Area=0.7856, Ratio of new/orig=0.142, vals(means) = 61.4 (28.5)  
37 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (60, 54, 56), Area=15.0680, Ratio of new/orig=1.107, vals(means) = 90.9 (59.3)  
30 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.336 mm @ (59, 51, 56), Area=0.3994, Ratio of new/orig=0.184, vals(means) = 43.6 (21.4)  
25 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.200 mm @ (61, 54, 56), Area=5.1555, Ratio of new/orig=0.512, vals(means) = 83.0 (59.3)  
23 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.263 mm @ (60, 51, 56), Area=0.3360, Ratio of new/orig=0.162, vals(means) = 54.7 (28.5)  
21 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.386 mm @ (59, 49, 56), Area=4.2437, Ratio of new/orig=0.706, vals(means) = 54.8 (39.7)  
19 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.137 mm @ (60, 50, 57), Area=1.9019, Ratio of new/orig=0.524, vals(means) = 52.0 (28.5)  
20 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (58, 51, 56), Area=1.8447, Ratio of new/orig=0.815, vals(means) = 43.7 (21.4)  
20 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (58, 51, 56), Area=1.8380, Ratio of new/orig=0.812, vals(means) = 43.7 (21.4)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 1.229 mm @ (60, 50, 57), Area=2.9029, Ratio of new/orig=0.800, vals(means) = 48.1 (28.5)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.438 mm @ (59, 50, 57), Area=2.7068, Ratio of new/orig=1.255, vals(means) = 42.1 (21.4)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 15.674 mm @ (81, 44, 57), Area=8.1918, Ratio of new/orig=0.696, vals(means) = 118.4 (126.7)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.139 mm @ (80, 43, 57), Area=10.0569, Ratio of new/orig=0.903, vals(means) = 118.2 (124.9)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.108 mm @ (79, 44, 57), Area=1.5581, Ratio of new/orig=0.333, vals(means) = 116.2 (125.4)  
2 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.467 mm @ (81, 42, 57), Area=2.7593, Ratio of new/orig=0.777, vals(means) = 117.6 (124.9)  
3 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.035 mm @ (81, 42, 57), Area=1.1662, Ratio of new/orig=0.329, vals(means) = 117.8 (124.9)  
5 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	max gradient 0.493 mm @ (81, 43, 56), Area=22.5156, Ratio of new/orig=1.057, vals(means) = 117.9 (124.9)  
6 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.403 mm @ (82, 42, 58), Area=3.2523, Ratio of new/orig=0.968, vals(means) = 118.8 (124.0)  
4 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.487 mm @ (81, 42, 56), Area=0.6876, Ratio of new/orig=0.179, vals(means) = 115.7 (124.9)  
7 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.352 mm @ (81, 41, 57), Area=4.8883, Ratio of new/orig=1.333, vals(means) = 118.8 (122.6)  
7 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.454 mm @ (83, 41, 58), Area=2.6814, Ratio of new/orig=0.848, vals(means) = 120.1 (123.2)  
12 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.239 mm @ (81, 42, 59), Area=0.9526, Ratio of new/orig=0.334, vals(means) = 118.1 (125.6)  
15 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.398 mm @ (80, 43, 57), Area=13.3157, Ratio of new/orig=1.196, vals(means) = 118.9 (124.9)  
20 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.249 mm @ (80, 42, 59), Area=1.6975, Ratio of new/orig=0.572, vals(means) = 115.6 (125.6)  
13 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.429 mm @ (80, 43, 58), Area=4.5541, Ratio of new/orig=1.278, vals(means) = 114.5 (125.6)  
10 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.001 mm @ (81, 42, 59), Area=0.9778, Ratio of new/orig=0.343, vals(means) = 118.3 (125.6)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.070 mm @ (59, 58, 71), Area=1.6812, Ratio of new/orig=0.726, vals(means) = 36.2 (31.7)  
2 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 10.796 mm @ (80, 43, 59), Area=1.2228, Ratio of new/orig=0.323, vals(means) = 119.3 (125.6)  
2 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (81, 43, 59), Area=2.1710, Ratio of new/orig=0.739, vals(means) = 119.5 (125.6)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (81, 43, 59), Area=2.1582, Ratio of new/orig=0.735, vals(means) = 119.5 (125.6)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.7834, Ratio of new/orig=1.076, vals(means) = 120.5 (129.0)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.7857, Ratio of new/orig=1.076, vals(means) = 120.5 (129.0)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.7885, Ratio of new/orig=1.077, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.7919, Ratio of new/orig=1.078, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.7957, Ratio of new/orig=1.078, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8000, Ratio of new/orig=1.079, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8045, Ratio of new/orig=1.080, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8094, Ratio of new/orig=1.081, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8145, Ratio of new/orig=1.083, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8198, Ratio of new/orig=1.084, vals(means) = 120.4 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8253, Ratio of new/orig=1.085, vals(means) = 120.3 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8309, Ratio of new/orig=1.086, vals(means) = 120.3 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8367, Ratio of new/orig=1.088, vals(means) = 120.3 (129.0)  
0 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.002 mm @ (78, 43, 49), Area=4.8425, Ratio of new/orig=1.089, vals(means) = 120.3 (129.0)  
66 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 37.144 mm @ (79, 47, 40), Area=2.3185, Ratio of new/orig=0.851, vals(means) = 118.6 (148.1)  
63 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 2.208 mm @ (79, 47, 39), Area=0.6075, Ratio of new/orig=0.120, vals(means) = 107.5 (135.2)  
69 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 10 more than 0.25, 8 more than .1
	max gradient 0.271 mm @ (79, 47, 38), Area=2.8397, Ratio of new/orig=0.865, vals(means) = 120.5 (135.2)  
67 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.252 mm @ (78, 46, 39), Area=3.1414, Ratio of new/orig=0.855, vals(means) = 112.5 (135.2)  
67 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.228 mm @ (78, 47, 38), Area=0.4190, Ratio of new/orig=0.116, vals(means) = 105.6 (135.2)  
65 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.275 mm @ (78, 48, 38), Area=3.4283, Ratio of new/orig=0.907, vals(means) = 118.5 (131.5)  
65 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.332 mm @ (78, 48, 38), Area=3.3587, Ratio of new/orig=0.888, vals(means) = 118.1 (131.5)  
64 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.080 mm @ (78, 47, 39), Area=1.6388, Ratio of new/orig=0.524, vals(means) = 116.3 (135.2)  
63 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.482 mm @ (77, 47, 37), Area=0.4852, Ratio of new/orig=0.155, vals(means) = 112.1 (134.0)  
60 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.365 mm @ (78, 49, 37), Area=2.1131, Ratio of new/orig=0.546, vals(means) = 117.5 (133.9)  
58 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.140 mm @ (78, 48, 38), Area=3.1249, Ratio of new/orig=0.826, vals(means) = 119.7 (131.5)  
60 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 1.553 mm @ (80, 49, 39), Area=1.5310, Ratio of new/orig=0.507, vals(means) = 117.6 (133.2)  
55 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.12
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.045 mm @ (82, 50, 38), Area=1.3253, Ratio of new/orig=0.501, vals(means) = 121.0 (131.2)  
64 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.302 mm @ (82, 49, 39), Area=1.3137, Ratio of new/orig=0.498, vals(means) = 117.9 (143.3)  
66 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.680 mm @ (79, 49, 37), Area=2.7517, Ratio of new/orig=0.835, vals(means) = 118.5 (133.9)  
67 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 6 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.171 mm @ (84, 50, 38), Area=7.5054, Ratio of new/orig=0.911, vals(means) = 117.6 (124.4)  
68 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.108 mm @ (83, 50, 39), Area=2.4553, Ratio of new/orig=0.568, vals(means) = 115.0 (131.2)  
67 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.158 mm @ (83, 50, 38), Area=2.5319, Ratio of new/orig=0.622, vals(means) = 119.5 (131.2)  
72 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.071 mm @ (79, 51, 39), Area=1.2299, Ratio of new/orig=0.478, vals(means) = 115.7 (127.5)  
78 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.142 mm @ (79, 50, 38), Area=2.3423, Ratio of new/orig=0.799, vals(means) = 119.3 (127.5)  
81 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (78, 51, 39), Area=1.4404, Ratio of new/orig=0.489, vals(means) = 119.9 (127.5)  
89 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.042 mm @ (78, 51, 39), Area=1.2365, Ratio of new/orig=0.420, vals(means) = 120.0 (127.5)  
106 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (83, 51, 38), Area=1.3604, Ratio of new/orig=0.319, vals(means) = 116.1 (131.2)  
136 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.028 mm @ (83, 51, 38), Area=1.4454, Ratio of new/orig=0.338, vals(means) = 115.9 (131.2)  
167 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.041 mm @ (78, 51, 39), Area=0.6886, Ratio of new/orig=0.234, vals(means) = 120.4 (127.5)  
220 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (78, 51, 39), Area=0.7830, Ratio of new/orig=0.266, vals(means) = 120.4 (127.5)  
300 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.024 mm @ (80, 49, 39), Area=2.0659, Ratio of new/orig=0.685, vals(means) = 117.6 (133.2)  
394 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (79, 51, 39), Area=1.3270, Ratio of new/orig=0.515, vals(means) = 116.8 (127.5)  
483 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (78, 49, 40), Area=2.5648, Ratio of new/orig=0.696, vals(means) = 116.4 (132.6)  
604 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (78, 49, 40), Area=2.5654, Ratio of new/orig=0.696, vals(means) = 116.4 (132.6)  
750 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (79, 47, 40), Area=5.0878, Ratio of new/orig=1.867, vals(means) = 119.4 (148.1)  
893 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (79, 47, 40), Area=5.2663, Ratio of new/orig=1.932, vals(means) = 119.4 (148.1)  
1055 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (81, 51, 38), Area=1.8984, Ratio of new/orig=0.738, vals(means) = 117.9 (130.8)  
1244 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (78, 50, 36), Area=1.3712, Ratio of new/orig=0.460, vals(means) = 118.8 (129.9)  
1464 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (80, 49, 39), Area=1.6481, Ratio of new/orig=0.546, vals(means) = 117.5 (133.2)  
1679 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (80, 49, 39), Area=1.6189, Ratio of new/orig=0.536, vals(means) = 117.5 (133.2)  
1889 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (52, 83, 41), Area=2.8044, Ratio of new/orig=0.682, vals(means) = 115.0 (119.2)  
3468 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 7.991 mm @ (78, 49, 37), Area=5.3787, Ratio of new/orig=1.391, vals(means) = 116.3 (133.9)  
3510 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.116 mm @ (80, 50, 38), Area=1.4837, Ratio of new/orig=0.578, vals(means) = 119.1 (130.8)  
3533 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.118 mm @ (81, 49, 38), Area=4.5388, Ratio of new/orig=1.740, vals(means) = 118.4 (133.2)  
3568 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.116 mm @ (80, 50, 38), Area=2.0595, Ratio of new/orig=0.803, vals(means) = 120.3 (130.8)  
3631 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (80, 49, 37), Area=1.2910, Ratio of new/orig=0.446, vals(means) = 120.7 (134.7)  
3720 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.066 mm @ (81, 49, 38), Area=4.7753, Ratio of new/orig=1.830, vals(means) = 118.6 (133.2)  
3815 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (79, 51, 38), Area=0.8772, Ratio of new/orig=0.332, vals(means) = 118.5 (127.5)  
3922 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (79, 51, 38), Area=0.9509, Ratio of new/orig=0.359, vals(means) = 118.5 (127.5)  
4026 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.038 mm @ (78, 48, 38), Area=2.0617, Ratio of new/orig=0.545, vals(means) = 117.3 (131.5)  
4187 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (81, 51, 40), Area=3.4608, Ratio of new/orig=1.436, vals(means) = 115.2 (131.6)  
4337 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (81, 51, 40), Area=3.4192, Ratio of new/orig=1.419, vals(means) = 115.2 (131.6)  
4525 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (79, 50, 37), Area=1.4655, Ratio of new/orig=0.447, vals(means) = 118.3 (129.9)  
4725 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (74, 41, 51), Area=2.0807, Ratio of new/orig=0.470, vals(means) = 113.9 (129.7)  
4924 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (74, 41, 51), Area=2.0492, Ratio of new/orig=0.463, vals(means) = 113.9 (129.7)  
5112 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (74, 41, 51), Area=2.0053, Ratio of new/orig=0.453, vals(means) = 113.8 (129.7)  
5335 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (75, 40, 54), Area=1.6504, Ratio of new/orig=0.428, vals(means) = 116.3 (125.4)  
5575 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (75, 39, 57), Area=1.1779, Ratio of new/orig=0.383, vals(means) = 117.4 (125.4)  
5819 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (75, 39, 57), Area=1.1826, Ratio of new/orig=0.384, vals(means) = 117.5 (125.4)  
6070 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (75, 39, 57), Area=1.2061, Ratio of new/orig=0.392, vals(means) = 117.6 (125.4)  
7739 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 10 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 10.603 mm @ (73, 39, 56), Area=1.7826, Ratio of new/orig=0.543, vals(means) = 114.4 (126.1)  
7790 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.165 mm @ (77, 44, 62), Area=0.4855, Ratio of new/orig=0.182, vals(means) = 117.2 (127.7)  
7845 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.127 mm @ (74, 39, 51), Area=1.4582, Ratio of new/orig=0.357, vals(means) = 111.5 (129.2)  
7899 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.093 mm @ (77, 44, 62), Area=1.8638, Ratio of new/orig=0.699, vals(means) = 117.8 (127.7)  
7974 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.061 mm @ (75, 39, 56), Area=1.2496, Ratio of new/orig=0.385, vals(means) = 112.1 (125.4)  
8055 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.062 mm @ (75, 38, 51), Area=1.3033, Ratio of new/orig=0.309, vals(means) = 113.5 (129.2)  
8142 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.030 mm @ (75, 39, 56), Area=1.1866, Ratio of new/orig=0.365, vals(means) = 111.7 (125.4)  
8262 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.041 mm @ (77, 38, 51), Area=1.6935, Ratio of new/orig=0.378, vals(means) = 115.6 (127.6)  
8383 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (73, 41, 51), Area=2.9902, Ratio of new/orig=0.558, vals(means) = 111.8 (121.1)  
8532 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (73, 41, 51), Area=3.2699, Ratio of new/orig=0.610, vals(means) = 111.8 (121.1)  
8688 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (76, 37, 51), Area=1.7697, Ratio of new/orig=0.376, vals(means) = 115.2 (126.6)  
8839 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (76, 37, 51), Area=1.8367, Ratio of new/orig=0.390, vals(means) = 115.2 (126.6)  
9006 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (79, 42, 64), Area=1.0755, Ratio of new/orig=0.429, vals(means) = 119.8 (125.4)  
9187 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (79, 42, 64), Area=1.0791, Ratio of new/orig=0.430, vals(means) = 119.8 (125.4)  
9397 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (76, 38, 57), Area=1.3158, Ratio of new/orig=0.439, vals(means) = 114.1 (125.7)  
9637 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (76, 38, 57), Area=1.4330, Ratio of new/orig=0.478, vals(means) = 114.3 (125.7)  
9849 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (74, 40, 51), Area=6.9415, Ratio of new/orig=1.691, vals(means) = 115.7 (129.7)  
10021 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (73, 40, 56), Area=1.8529, Ratio of new/orig=0.579, vals(means) = 115.6 (127.0)  
10237 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (73, 40, 56), Area=1.7982, Ratio of new/orig=0.562, vals(means) = 115.7 (127.0)  
10466 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (75, 39, 52), Area=1.8209, Ratio of new/orig=0.413, vals(means) = 112.0 (126.0)  
10661 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (75, 39, 52), Area=1.8335, Ratio of new/orig=0.416, vals(means) = 112.0 (126.0)  
11808 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 9 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 9.223 mm @ (76, 39, 44), Area=1.8887, Ratio of new/orig=0.598, vals(means) = 112.2 (130.4)  
11843 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.168 mm @ (74, 42, 45), Area=1.9703, Ratio of new/orig=0.526, vals(means) = 113.5 (132.4)  
11867 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (76, 41, 44), Area=1.3414, Ratio of new/orig=0.383, vals(means) = 112.2 (131.3)  
11927 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.173 mm @ (75, 38, 51), Area=2.3724, Ratio of new/orig=0.563, vals(means) = 114.8 (129.2)  
11987 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.089 mm @ (73, 42, 52), Area=3.5320, Ratio of new/orig=0.572, vals(means) = 113.9 (137.6)  
12055 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.181 mm @ (75, 38, 53), Area=2.0930, Ratio of new/orig=0.448, vals(means) = 111.3 (126.0)  
12168 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.060 mm @ (74, 39, 52), Area=2.3361, Ratio of new/orig=0.491, vals(means) = 111.4 (126.0)  
12249 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.055 mm @ (76, 39, 53), Area=2.6130, Ratio of new/orig=0.587, vals(means) = 116.1 (123.9)  
12331 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.034 mm @ (75, 39, 52), Area=1.9237, Ratio of new/orig=0.436, vals(means) = 112.2 (126.0)  
12453 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (76, 37, 53), Area=1.4728, Ratio of new/orig=0.332, vals(means) = 110.7 (122.5)  
12591 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (74, 43, 46), Area=2.0835, Ratio of new/orig=0.376, vals(means) = 113.6 (131.6)  
12720 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.017 mm @ (75, 37, 53), Area=2.8098, Ratio of new/orig=0.644, vals(means) = 109.3 (124.8)  
12892 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (76, 46, 63), Area=1.3149, Ratio of new/orig=0.408, vals(means) = 115.3 (128.7)  
13063 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (76, 40, 52), Area=2.7137, Ratio of new/orig=0.620, vals(means) = 119.5 (125.3)  
13215 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (76, 40, 52), Area=2.6847, Ratio of new/orig=0.614, vals(means) = 119.5 (125.3)  
13365 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (74, 38, 53), Area=2.5794, Ratio of new/orig=0.439, vals(means) = 108.5 (126.0)  
13555 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (74, 38, 53), Area=2.7183, Ratio of new/orig=0.463, vals(means) = 108.5 (126.0)  
13709 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (73, 41, 51), Area=3.7231, Ratio of new/orig=0.695, vals(means) = 112.9 (121.1)  
13885 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (73, 41, 51), Area=3.6636, Ratio of new/orig=0.683, vals(means) = 112.9 (121.1)  
14070 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (74, 37, 53), Area=3.9323, Ratio of new/orig=0.611, vals(means) = 108.8 (124.8)  
14242 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (73, 40, 56), Area=1.3694, Ratio of new/orig=0.428, vals(means) = 116.5 (127.0)  
14863 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 18 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 7.741 mm @ (76, 42, 64), Area=1.2925, Ratio of new/orig=0.393, vals(means) = 115.8 (126.3)  
14905 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.047 mm @ (77, 43, 66), Area=1.6019, Ratio of new/orig=0.415, vals(means) = 113.5 (125.7)  
14852 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.477 mm @ (77, 43, 64), Area=1.3171, Ratio of new/orig=0.470, vals(means) = 114.7 (126.3)  
14820 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.146 mm @ (76, 42, 66), Area=1.6978, Ratio of new/orig=0.460, vals(means) = 114.1 (125.7)  
14803 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.084 mm @ (77, 43, 64), Area=1.4082, Ratio of new/orig=0.502, vals(means) = 114.4 (126.3)  
14746 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.115 mm @ (76, 44, 65), Area=0.5218, Ratio of new/orig=0.130, vals(means) = 113.1 (126.9)  
14666 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.056 mm @ (76, 44, 66), Area=1.5682, Ratio of new/orig=0.414, vals(means) = 113.0 (126.2)  
14568 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.148 mm @ (77, 43, 64), Area=1.4980, Ratio of new/orig=0.534, vals(means) = 115.0 (126.3)  
14453 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (76, 42, 66), Area=1.5615, Ratio of new/orig=0.423, vals(means) = 113.5 (125.7)  
14277 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.037 mm @ (76, 42, 66), Area=1.4439, Ratio of new/orig=0.391, vals(means) = 113.4 (125.7)  
14110 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.039 mm @ (78, 43, 63), Area=2.3493, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 116.2 (126.3)  
13917 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.029 mm @ (79, 43, 64), Area=0.7806, Ratio of new/orig=0.342, vals(means) = 119.8 (125.4)  
13718 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (79, 42, 65), Area=1.3666, Ratio of new/orig=0.482, vals(means) = 118.3 (125.4)  
13462 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (78, 41, 65), Area=1.9888, Ratio of new/orig=0.457, vals(means) = 116.3 (124.2)  
13207 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (76, 47, 63), Area=1.2948, Ratio of new/orig=0.364, vals(means) = 116.5 (128.7)  
12942 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (80, 42, 66), Area=2.1237, Ratio of new/orig=0.423, vals(means) = 120.8 (123.1)  
12642 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (80, 42, 66), Area=2.1039, Ratio of new/orig=0.419, vals(means) = 120.8 (123.1)  
12354 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (78, 44, 64), Area=0.8011, Ratio of new/orig=0.349, vals(means) = 118.2 (125.9)  
12103 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.006 mm @ (78, 44, 64), Area=0.8330, Ratio of new/orig=0.363, vals(means) = 118.2 (125.9)  
11809 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.4264, Ratio of new/orig=0.521, vals(means) = 120.8 (113.4)  
11533 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.4055, Ratio of new/orig=0.513, vals(means) = 120.9 (113.4)  
11230 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.3847, Ratio of new/orig=0.505, vals(means) = 120.9 (113.4)  
10944 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.3640, Ratio of new/orig=0.498, vals(means) = 120.9 (113.4)  
10619 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.3436, Ratio of new/orig=0.490, vals(means) = 120.9 (113.4)  
10337 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.3235, Ratio of new/orig=0.483, vals(means) = 120.9 (113.4)  
10058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.3038, Ratio of new/orig=0.476, vals(means) = 120.8 (113.4)  
9778 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (72, 54, 44), Area=1.2846, Ratio of new/orig=0.469, vals(means) = 120.7 (113.4)  
9521 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (71, 54, 45), Area=1.4833, Ratio of new/orig=0.497, vals(means) = 115.1 (136.9)  
9299 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (71, 54, 45), Area=1.4640, Ratio of new/orig=0.491, vals(means) = 115.0 (136.9)  
9066 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.003 mm @ (70, 50, 43), Area=1.1992, Ratio of new/orig=0.499, vals(means) = 119.1 (144.0)  
8862 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (70, 50, 43), Area=1.2038, Ratio of new/orig=0.500, vals(means) = 119.2 (144.0)  
7804 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.555 mm @ (60, 51, 55), Area=1.0977, Ratio of new/orig=0.533, vals(means) = 46.4 (36.9)  
7242 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 5.749 mm @ (61, 50, 55), Area=18.8108, Ratio of new/orig=1.512, vals(means) = 95.2 (113.3)  
7206 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (78, 44, 65), Area=1.2188, Ratio of new/orig=0.511, vals(means) = 117.2 (125.9)  
7173 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (78, 44, 65), Area=1.2025, Ratio of new/orig=0.505, vals(means) = 117.2 (125.9)  
7126 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.429 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=1.0668, Ratio of new/orig=0.481, vals(means) = 45.5 (23.7)  
7026 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.475 mm @ (58, 52, 55), Area=0.7049, Ratio of new/orig=0.304, vals(means) = 46.3 (26.7)  
6894 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.304 mm @ (56, 51, 55), Area=1.2130, Ratio of new/orig=0.494, vals(means) = 47.8 (22.7)  
6925 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.173 mm @ (56, 51, 55), Area=1.6458, Ratio of new/orig=0.670, vals(means) = 51.8 (22.7)  
6923 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.695 mm @ (59, 51, 55), Area=1.5119, Ratio of new/orig=0.712, vals(means) = 46.9 (23.7)  
6810 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	max gradient 1.480 mm @ (58, 52, 53), Area=1.1089, Ratio of new/orig=0.488, vals(means) = 46.1 (23.8)  
6780 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
setting smoothness coefficient to 0.40
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.050 mm @ (58, 51, 54), Area=1.1410, Ratio of new/orig=0.523, vals(means) = 49.8 (23.7)  
6837 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.251 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=0.5104, Ratio of new/orig=0.230, vals(means) = 46.4 (23.7)  
6865 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.376 mm @ (59, 52, 55), Area=3.4571, Ratio of new/orig=1.446, vals(means) = 46.4 (26.7)  
6930 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.258 mm @ (59, 53, 55), Area=1.6160, Ratio of new/orig=0.514, vals(means) = 55.1 (26.7)  
6975 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.041 mm @ (71, 52, 43), Area=0.8573, Ratio of new/orig=0.451, vals(means) = 120.6 (145.8)  
7060 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.040 mm @ (71, 52, 43), Area=0.8753, Ratio of new/orig=0.460, vals(means) = 120.4 (145.8)  
7183 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.081 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=1.9311, Ratio of new/orig=0.871, vals(means) = 49.1 (23.7)  
7429 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.318 mm @ (57, 53, 55), Area=0.7097, Ratio of new/orig=0.164, vals(means) = 49.5 (31.8)  
7798 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.107 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=1.1324, Ratio of new/orig=0.511, vals(means) = 47.5 (23.7)  
8232 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.170 mm @ (58, 52, 55), Area=0.8010, Ratio of new/orig=0.345, vals(means) = 48.4 (26.7)  
8708 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.107 mm @ (58, 52, 54), Area=0.5637, Ratio of new/orig=0.250, vals(means) = 49.2 (26.7)  
9265 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.216 mm @ (58, 51, 56), Area=1.2076, Ratio of new/orig=0.534, vals(means) = 70.2 (21.4)  
9828 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.258 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=1.0226, Ratio of new/orig=0.461, vals(means) = 44.7 (23.7)  
10396 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.019 mm @ (58, 52, 54), Area=0.6473, Ratio of new/orig=0.287, vals(means) = 48.1 (26.7)  
9934 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.115 mm @ (58, 50, 55), Area=0.8612, Ratio of new/orig=0.393, vals(means) = 49.4 (23.7)  
10128 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.975 mm @ (59, 50, 54), Area=4.5053, Ratio of new/orig=1.331, vals(means) = 47.3 (23.7)  
10306 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.612 mm @ (59, 51, 55), Area=3.3534, Ratio of new/orig=1.580, vals(means) = 49.0 (23.7)  
10509 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.634 mm @ (58, 53, 54), Area=1.0902, Ratio of new/orig=0.389, vals(means) = 49.8 (26.7)  
10813 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.500 mm @ (59, 53, 54), Area=0.4796, Ratio of new/orig=0.164, vals(means) = 47.1 (26.7)  
10739 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.125 mm @ (59, 53, 54), Area=1.4003, Ratio of new/orig=0.480, vals(means) = 48.1 (26.7)  
10758 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 2 more than .1
	max gradient 0.525 mm @ (57, 53, 54), Area=0.5084, Ratio of new/orig=0.190, vals(means) = 49.7 (31.8)  
11344 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 3.646 mm @ (60, 53, 55), Area=2.3468, Ratio of new/orig=0.597, vals(means) = 56.4 (26.8)  
11502 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 1.027 mm @ (70, 51, 41), Area=0.8364, Ratio of new/orig=0.358, vals(means) = 119.7 (131.2)  
11640 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 19 more than 0.25, 9 more than .1
	max gradient 0.551 mm @ (70, 50, 44), Area=0.7076, Ratio of new/orig=0.290, vals(means) = 119.6 (146.6)  
11686 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 22 more than 0.25, 7 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.260 mm @ (70, 49, 41), Area=1.3627, Ratio of new/orig=0.436, vals(means) = 113.4 (121.0)  
11653 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 9 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.240 mm @ (71, 51, 43), Area=0.8464, Ratio of new/orig=0.413, vals(means) = 117.8 (144.0)  
11750 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 11 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.079 mm @ (70, 51, 44), Area=2.1139, Ratio of new/orig=0.915, vals(means) = 120.0 (146.6)  
11783 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 5 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.531 mm @ (69, 51, 43), Area=1.0160, Ratio of new/orig=0.400, vals(means) = 120.3 (136.1)  
11877 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.965 mm @ (70, 53, 41), Area=0.8152, Ratio of new/orig=0.387, vals(means) = 120.8 (133.6)  
11965 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 19 more than 0.25, 7 more than .1
pct change decreased
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.061 mm @ (70, 52, 45), Area=0.5265, Ratio of new/orig=0.232, vals(means) = 119.1 (139.2)  
11754 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 13 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.279 mm @ (69, 51, 40), Area=1.2545, Ratio of new/orig=0.387, vals(means) = 115.7 (129.9)  
11561 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 7 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.242 mm @ (69, 52, 44), Area=0.3876, Ratio of new/orig=0.156, vals(means) = 117.6 (136.5)  
11376 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.207 mm @ (69, 50, 41), Area=1.2464, Ratio of new/orig=0.410, vals(means) = 115.5 (129.9)  
10962 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.122 mm @ (69, 52, 43), Area=1.2057, Ratio of new/orig=0.502, vals(means) = 119.0 (131.6)  
10390 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.039 mm @ (70, 51, 43), Area=1.0960, Ratio of new/orig=0.502, vals(means) = 119.5 (144.0)  
9716 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.044 mm @ (70, 50, 46), Area=0.9597, Ratio of new/orig=0.346, vals(means) = 117.1 (136.4)  
8931 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.082 mm @ (69, 50, 43), Area=2.0030, Ratio of new/orig=0.746, vals(means) = 117.9 (136.1)  
8058 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.049 mm @ (69, 51, 46), Area=1.3093, Ratio of new/orig=0.434, vals(means) = 115.7 (134.7)  
7204 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 0.036 mm @ (69, 52, 45), Area=1.7824, Ratio of new/orig=0.688, vals(means) = 116.2 (136.5)  
6328 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.021 mm @ (69, 53, 43), Area=1.7063, Ratio of new/orig=0.728, vals(means) = 119.0 (131.6)  
5552 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.027 mm @ (72, 52, 45), Area=1.2204, Ratio of new/orig=0.439, vals(means) = 120.0 (129.0)  
4893 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (72, 52, 45), Area=1.1322, Ratio of new/orig=0.407, vals(means) = 120.1 (129.0)  
4389 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (61, 52, 57), Area=1.2253, Ratio of new/orig=0.440, vals(means) = 59.1 (28.5)  
3964 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (59, 52, 53), Area=1.0104, Ratio of new/orig=0.445, vals(means) = 45.1 (23.8)  
3639 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (59, 52, 53), Area=1.0451, Ratio of new/orig=0.460, vals(means) = 45.0 (23.8)  
3389 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (60, 53, 57), Area=4.9585, Ratio of new/orig=0.786, vals(means) = 48.8 (28.5)  
3217 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.026 mm @ (60, 53, 57), Area=4.8601, Ratio of new/orig=0.770, vals(means) = 48.7 (28.5)  
3086 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.016 mm @ (70, 50, 44), Area=0.8768, Ratio of new/orig=0.359, vals(means) = 119.4 (146.6)  
3000 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.015 mm @ (68, 63, 74), Area=0.8693, Ratio of new/orig=0.383, vals(means) = 54.1 (27.8)  
2948 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (57, 62, 74), Area=1.4105, Ratio of new/orig=0.554, vals(means) = 49.8 (30.1)  
2910 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (57, 62, 74), Area=1.3574, Ratio of new/orig=0.533, vals(means) = 50.0 (30.1)  
2890 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (71, 53, 42), Area=0.8304, Ratio of new/orig=0.442, vals(means) = 122.1 (145.8)  
2863 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (71, 50, 45), Area=1.1019, Ratio of new/orig=0.488, vals(means) = 119.3 (146.6)  
2870 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (71, 50, 45), Area=1.0912, Ratio of new/orig=0.483, vals(means) = 119.3 (146.6)  
2861 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.013 mm @ (70, 51, 45), Area=0.9532, Ratio of new/orig=0.412, vals(means) = 120.1 (146.6)  
2870 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.012 mm @ (70, 51, 45), Area=0.9807, Ratio of new/orig=0.424, vals(means) = 120.1 (146.6)  
2879 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (71, 50, 43), Area=0.9200, Ratio of new/orig=0.424, vals(means) = 119.7 (144.0)  
2899 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (70, 50, 44), Area=1.2188, Ratio of new/orig=0.499, vals(means) = 119.1 (146.6)  
2908 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=0)
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (70, 50, 44), Area=1.2147, Ratio of new/orig=0.497, vals(means) = 119.0 (146.6)  
2790 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 12.298 mm @ (70, 52, 46), Area=1.3533, Ratio of new/orig=0.564, vals(means) = 117.3 (131.8)  
2795 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.223 mm @ (70, 51, 44), Area=1.3795, Ratio of new/orig=0.597, vals(means) = 119.8 (146.6)  
2794 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.177 mm @ (60, 50, 55), Area=2.8159, Ratio of new/orig=0.499, vals(means) = 52.2 (36.9)  
2799 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.077 mm @ (60, 51, 56), Area=0.6553, Ratio of new/orig=0.316, vals(means) = 45.7 (28.5)  
2794 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.076 mm @ (70, 51, 44), Area=1.4310, Ratio of new/orig=0.620, vals(means) = 120.0 (146.6)  
2807 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.065 mm @ (70, 51, 44), Area=1.4420, Ratio of new/orig=0.624, vals(means) = 120.1 (146.6)  
2809 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (60, 51, 55), Area=3.7406, Ratio of new/orig=1.815, vals(means) = 48.5 (36.9)  
2787 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.025 mm @ (70, 52, 45), Area=0.7159, Ratio of new/orig=0.316, vals(means) = 114.0 (139.2)  
2789 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.020 mm @ (70, 50, 45), Area=0.7765, Ratio of new/orig=0.302, vals(means) = 119.6 (146.6)  
2764 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.018 mm @ (70, 50, 45), Area=0.7940, Ratio of new/orig=0.309, vals(means) = 119.6 (146.6)  
2732 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.011 mm @ (60, 52, 55), Area=3.7363, Ratio of new/orig=1.440, vals(means) = 47.9 (26.8)  
2717 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.014 mm @ (60, 52, 55), Area=3.6035, Ratio of new/orig=1.389, vals(means) = 47.9 (26.8)  
2706 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (60, 52, 57), Area=1.1998, Ratio of new/orig=0.421, vals(means) = 43.0 (28.5)  
2682 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.010 mm @ (60, 52, 57), Area=1.2236, Ratio of new/orig=0.429, vals(means) = 43.0 (28.5)  
2672 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.009 mm @ (60, 52, 57), Area=1.2737, Ratio of new/orig=0.447, vals(means) = 42.9 (28.5)  
2671 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.008 mm @ (60, 52, 57), Area=1.3369, Ratio of new/orig=0.469, vals(means) = 42.8 (28.5)  
2654 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.007 mm @ (60, 52, 57), Area=1.4014, Ratio of new/orig=0.491, vals(means) = 42.7 (28.5)  
2642 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.005 mm @ (60, 53, 56), Area=2.7131, Ratio of new/orig=0.489, vals(means) = 56.7 (28.5)  
2634 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (71, 44, 51), Area=7.3796, Ratio of new/orig=1.364, vals(means) = 112.3 (134.1)  
2626 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.004 mm @ (71, 44, 51), Area=7.3665, Ratio of new/orig=1.361, vals(means) = 112.3 (134.1)  
2617 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.002 mm @ (71, 44, 51), Area=7.3521, Ratio of new/orig=1.359, vals(means) = 112.2 (134.1)  
2512 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 13.625 mm @ (60, 52, 56), Area=1.6430, Ratio of new/orig=0.588, vals(means) = 46.8 (28.5)  
2511 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.175 mm @ (61, 51, 57), Area=1.8803, Ratio of new/orig=0.674, vals(means) = 67.0 (28.5)  
2508 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.602 mm @ (59, 52, 55), Area=1.5470, Ratio of new/orig=0.647, vals(means) = 46.5 (26.7)  
2499 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.349 mm @ (59, 52, 54), Area=1.4041, Ratio of new/orig=0.591, vals(means) = 46.1 (26.7)  
2500 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 2 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.322 mm @ (59, 52, 56), Area=1.7022, Ratio of new/orig=0.704, vals(means) = 41.9 (29.2)  
2496 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 3 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.221 mm @ (58, 52, 55), Area=2.0193, Ratio of new/orig=0.870, vals(means) = 53.3 (26.7)  
2489 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.269 mm @ (60, 52, 54), Area=1.7087, Ratio of new/orig=0.721, vals(means) = 60.9 (26.8)  
2483 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 3 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.147 mm @ (58, 50, 55), Area=1.3710, Ratio of new/orig=0.625, vals(means) = 47.8 (23.7)  
2485 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
setting smoothness coefficient to 1.00
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.022 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=0.5549, Ratio of new/orig=0.250, vals(means) = 44.7 (23.7)  
2485 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.044 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=0.5549, Ratio of new/orig=0.250, vals(means) = 44.7 (23.7)  
2302 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.019 mm @ (58, 51, 55), Area=0.5549, Ratio of new/orig=0.250, vals(means) = 44.7 (23.7)  
2485 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness coefficient to 2.00
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
	max gradient 0.036 mm @ (51, 75, 90), Area=6.8456, Ratio of new/orig=1.000, vals(means) = 129.5 (40.3)  
1 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.313 mm @ (40, 37, 57), Area=3.8074, Ratio of new/orig=0.910, vals(means) = 83.6 (33.1)  
47 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 4 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 15.947 mm @ (62, 74, 86), Area=4.4409, Ratio of new/orig=1.562, vals(means) = 86.8 (45.0)  
30 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.207 mm @ (60, 74, 86), Area=7.6169, Ratio of new/orig=0.733, vals(means) = 96.7 (84.3)  
21 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.299 mm @ (82, 36, 38), Area=10.5581, Ratio of new/orig=1.104, vals(means) = 89.9 (39.7)  
21 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
rms increased - undoing step...
	switching integration type to fixed (done=1)
	max gradient 0.033 mm @ (82, 36, 38), Area=10.5581, Ratio of new/orig=1.104, vals(means) = 89.9 (39.7)  
21 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
rms increased - undoing step...
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
	max gradient 0.056 mm @ (79, 82, 57), Area=16.4582, Ratio of new/orig=1.098, vals(means) = 153.6 (76.0)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.331 mm @ (63, 29, 42), Area=1.0508, Ratio of new/orig=0.789, vals(means) = 71.3 (29.8)  
23 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
pct change decreased
	max gradient 2.418 mm @ (82, 45, 44), Area=0.3006, Ratio of new/orig=0.093, vals(means) = 113.5 (140.9)  
21 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	switching integration type to fixed (done=0)
	max gradient 0.165 mm @ (82, 45, 44), Area=6.5301, Ratio of new/orig=2.013, vals(means) = 106.3 (140.9)  
20 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.120 mm @ (82, 45, 44), Area=5.6429, Ratio of new/orig=1.739, vals(means) = 108.1 (140.9)  
20 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	max gradient 0.071 mm @ (83, 37, 40), Area=6.3886, Ratio of new/orig=0.934, vals(means) = 86.7 (40.2)  
24 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 1 more than .1
	max gradient 0.538 mm @ (81, 46, 45), Area=2.1365, Ratio of new/orig=0.718, vals(means) = 121.4 (132.8)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
pct change decreased
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 1 of 2
	max gradient 0.174 mm @ (63, 29, 42), Area=0.9258, Ratio of new/orig=0.695, vals(means) = 71.4 (29.8)  
27 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 1 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
	pct change < tol 0.025, nsmall = 2 of 2
	switching integration type to optimal (done=1)
	max gradient 0.135 mm @ (81, 46, 45), Area=0.6412, Ratio of new/orig=0.216, vals(means) = 119.9 (132.8)  
26 nodes compressed more than 0.5, 0 more than 0.25, 0 more than .1
writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.m3z...
registration took 689 minutes and 57 seconds.
---------------------------------------
SubCort Seg Fri Jan 20 03:02:29 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_ca_label -cross-sequence norm transforms/talairach.m3z /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca aseg
labeling across sequences, equivalent to:
	-renormalize 1 9
	-a 2
	-regularize 0.500
reading 1 input volumes...
reading classifier array from /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca...
setting gca type = Normal gca type
Direction cosines read:
 x_r = -1.0000, y_r =  0.0000, z_r =  0.0000
 x_a =  0.0000, y_a =  0.0000, z_a =  1.0000
 x_s =  0.0000, y_s = -1.0000, z_s =  0.0000
 c_r =  0.0000, c_a =  0.0000, c_s =  0.0000
reading input volume from norm...
average std[0] = 7.7
reading transform from transforms/talairach.m3z...
gcam->type = vox
reading labels out of gcam file...
Atlas used for the 3D morph was /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/average/RB40_talairach_2005-07-20.gca
average std = 7.7   using min determinant for regularization = 6.0
0 singular and 0 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
labeling volume...
renormalizing input #0
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): mean = 110.44 +- 30.5
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): peak at 118.00, smooth at 119.00 (42866 voxels), scaling by 1.08
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 118.00, smooth at 119.00 (42866 voxels), scaling by 1.08
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): mean = 68.27 +- 35.5
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): peak at 98.00, smooth at 98.00 (44629 voxels), scaling by 1.44
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 98.00, smooth at 98.00 (44629 voxels), scaling by 1.44
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): mean = 31.35 +- 44.9
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): peak at 43.00, smooth at 43.00 (1538 voxels), scaling by 1.37
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 43.00, smooth at 43.00 (1538 voxels), scaling by 1.37
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): mean = 90.26 +- 29.5
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): peak at 108.00, smooth at 108.00 (3778 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 108.00, smooth at 108.00 (3778 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): mean = 61.63 +- 33.0
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): peak at 92.00, smooth at 91.00 (10334 voxels), scaling by 1.48
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 92.00, smooth at 91.00 (10334 voxels), scaling by 1.48
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): mean = 99.83 +- 28.8
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (1178 voxels), scaling by 1.05
Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 104.00, smooth at 105.00 (1178 voxels), scaling by 1.05
Left_Caudate (11): mean = 85.31 +- 30.6
Left_Caudate (11): peak at 102.00, smooth at 102.00 (447 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Caudate (11): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 102.00, smooth at 102.00 (447 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Putamen (12): mean = 87.49 +- 27.9
Left_Putamen (12): peak at 106.00, smooth at 105.00 (975 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Putamen (12): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 106.00, smooth at 105.00 (975 voxels), scaling by 1.20
Left_Pallidum (13): mean = 105.60 +- 27.8
Left_Pallidum (13): peak at 116.00, smooth at 116.00 (295 voxels), scaling by 1.10
Left_Pallidum (13): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 116.00, smooth at 116.00 (295 voxels), scaling by 1.10
Third_Ventricle (14): mean = 38.03 +- 48.3
Third_Ventricle (14): peak at 50.00, smooth at 45.00 (218 voxels), scaling by 1.18
Third_Ventricle (14): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 50.00, smooth at 45.00 (218 voxels), scaling by 1.18
Fourth_Ventricle (15): mean = 29.65 +- 36.8
Fourth_Ventricle (15): peak at 38.00, smooth at 39.00 (310 voxels), scaling by 1.32
Fourth_Ventricle (15): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 38.00, smooth at 39.00 (310 voxels), scaling by 1.32
Brain_Stem (16): mean = 87.71 +- 35.6
Brain_Stem (16): peak at 107.00, smooth at 107.00 (3651 voxels), scaling by 1.22
Brain_Stem (16): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 107.00, smooth at 107.00 (3651 voxels), scaling by 1.22
Left_Hippocampus (17): mean = 68.90 +- 35.8
Left_Hippocampus (17): peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (536 voxels), scaling by 1.31
Left_Hippocampus (17): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (536 voxels), scaling by 1.31
Left_Amygdala (18): mean = 67.99 +- 29.7
Left_Amygdala (18): peak at 93.00, smooth at 93.00 (231 voxels), scaling by 1.37
CSF (24): mean = 46.81 +- 48.2
CSF (24): peak at 54.00, smooth at 45.00 (132 voxels), scaling by 0.96
CSF (24): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 54.00, smooth at 45.00 (132 voxels), scaling by 0.96
Left_Accumbens_area (26): mean = 76.03 +- 30.0
Left_Accumbens_area (26): peak at 93.00, smooth at 93.00 (89 voxels), scaling by 1.22
Left_VentralDC (28): mean = 97.34 +- 41.4
Left_VentralDC (28): peak at 113.00, smooth at 113.00 (788 voxels), scaling by 1.16
Left_VentralDC (28): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 113.00, smooth at 113.00 (788 voxels), scaling by 1.16
Left_undetermined (29): mean = 42.56 +- 28.1
Left_vessel (30): mean = 68.11 +- 38.7
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): mean = 110.87 +- 30.5
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): peak at 118.00, smooth at 118.00 (42660 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 118.00, smooth at 118.00 (42660 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): mean = 68.38 +- 35.5
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): peak at 93.00, smooth at 92.00 (44252 voxels), scaling by 1.35
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 93.00, smooth at 92.00 (44252 voxels), scaling by 1.35
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): mean = 29.32 +- 45.9
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): peak at 39.00, smooth at 39.00 (1377 voxels), scaling by 1.33
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 39.00, smooth at 39.00 (1377 voxels), scaling by 1.33
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): mean = 89.78 +- 29.1
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): peak at 110.00, smooth at 111.00 (3432 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 110.00, smooth at 111.00 (3432 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): mean = 62.30 +- 32.5
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): peak at 94.00, smooth at 94.00 (10766 voxels), scaling by 1.51
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 94.00, smooth at 94.00 (10766 voxels), scaling by 1.51
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): mean = 93.91 +- 31.2
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): peak at 107.00, smooth at 106.00 (1081 voxels), scaling by 1.13
Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 107.00, smooth at 106.00 (1081 voxels), scaling by 1.13
Right_Caudate (50): mean = 77.96 +- 33.5
Right_Caudate (50): peak at 97.00, smooth at 97.00 (437 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Right_Caudate (50): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 97.00, smooth at 97.00 (437 voxels), scaling by 1.24
Right_Putamen (51): mean = 88.93 +- 28.0
Right_Putamen (51): peak at 104.00, smooth at 104.00 (925 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Putamen (51): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 104.00, smooth at 104.00 (925 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Pallidum (52): mean = 107.12 +- 27.7
Right_Pallidum (52): peak at 114.00, smooth at 114.00 (291 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Pallidum (52): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 114.00, smooth at 114.00 (291 voxels), scaling by 1.06
Right_Hippocampus (53): mean = 67.75 +- 36.5
Right_Hippocampus (53): peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (554 voxels), scaling by 1.33
Right_Hippocampus (53): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 90.00, smooth at 90.00 (554 voxels), scaling by 1.33
Right_Amygdala (54): mean = 66.87 +- 30.5
Right_Amygdala (54): peak at 87.00, smooth at 87.00 (253 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Right_Amygdala (54): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 87.00, smooth at 87.00 (253 voxels), scaling by 1.30
Right_Accumbens_area (58): mean = 77.50 +- 30.9
Right_Accumbens_area (58): peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (80 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_Accumbens_area (58): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 91.00, smooth at 91.00 (80 voxels), scaling by 1.17
Right_VentralDC (60): mean = 95.03 +- 41.0
Right_VentralDC (60): peak at 113.00, smooth at 112.00 (762 voxels), scaling by 1.18
Right_VentralDC (60): AFTER PRIOR: peak at 113.00, smooth at 112.00 (762 voxels), scaling by 1.18
Right_vessel (62): mean = 65.11 +- 36.3
Fifth_Ventricle (72): mean = 35.02 +- 39.4
WM_hypointensities (77): mean = 85.84 +- 35.7
Left_WM_hypointensities (78): mean = 91.90 +- 32.4
Right_WM_hypointensities (79): mean = 91.39 +- 33.0
non_WM_hypointensities (80): mean = 64.78 +- 35.3
Left_non_WM_hypointensities (81): mean = 73.23 +- 39.8
Right_non_WM_hypointensities (82): mean = 69.41 +- 39.5
Optic_Chiasm (85): mean = 78.12 +- 71.9
Left_Inf_Lat_Vent (5): scaling by 1.28 = 59.1 (based on 1.37 for lateral ventricle)
Right_Inf_Lat_Vent (44): scaling by 1.25 = 50.3 (based on 1.33 for lateral ventricle)
relabeling volume...
101897 gm and wm labels changed (%27 to gray, %73 to white out of all changed labels)
820 hippocampal voxels changed.
4 amygdala voxels changed.
pass 1: 100820 changed. image ll: -1412733.696, PF=1.000
pass 2: 23857 changed. image ll: -1412733.693, PF=1.000
pass 3: 9260 changed.
pass 4: 4285 changed.
20281 border labels changed to MLE ...
writing labeled volume to aseg...
auto-labeling took 29 minutes and 27 seconds.
---------------------------------------------
ASeg Stats Fri Jan 20 03:31:56 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf
mri_segstats --seg mri/aseg --sum stats/aseg.stats --pv mri/norm --in mri/orig --ctab-default --excludeid 0 --brain-vol-from-seg --brainmask mri/brain --subject EEsurf --in-intensity-name orig --in-intensity-units MR
Using defalt ctab /home/christip/sw/freesurfer/tkmeditColorsCMA
Loading mri/aseg
Loading mri/orig
Loading mri/norm
Loading mri/brain
# nbrainmaskvoxels 1673454
# brainmaskvolume  1673454.0
# nbrainsegvoxels 1371743
# brainsegvolume  1371743.0
Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3
Generating list of segmentation ids
Found 165 segmentations
Computing statistics for each segmentation
  1     1  Left-Cerebral-Exterior  0
  2     2  Left-Cerebral-White-Matter 257027
  3     3  Left-Cerebral-Cortex 289388
  4     4  Left-Lateral-Ventricle 4546
  5     5  Left-Inf-Lat-Vent  319
  6     6  Left-Cerebellum-Exterior  0
  7     7  Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 11397
  8     8  Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 63723
  9     9  Left-Thalamus  0
 10    10  Left-Thalamus-Proper 11542
 11    11  Left-Caudate 4887
 12    12  Left-Putamen 7025
 13    13  Left-Pallidum 1273
 14    14  3rd-Ventricle  887
 15    15  4th-Ventricle 2948
 16    16  Brain-Stem 24064
 17    17  Left-Hippocampus 5069
 18    18  Left-Amygdala 2184
 19    19  Left-Insula  0
 20    20  Left-Operculum  0
 21    21  Line-1  0
 22    22  Line-2  0
 23    23  Line-3  0
 24    24  CSF 1373
 25    25  Left-Lesion  0
 26    26  Left-Accumbens-area  639
 27    27  Left-Substancia-Nigra  0
 28    28  Left-VentralDC 4308
 29    29  Left-undetermined  0
 30    30  Left-vessel   39
 31    31  Left-choroid-plexus  0
 32    32  Left-F3orb  0
 33    33  Left-lOg  0
 34    34  Left-aOg  0
 35    35  Left-mOg  0
 36    36  Left-pOg  0
 37    37  Left-Stellate  0
 38    38  Left-Porg  0
 39    39  Left-Aorg  0
 40    40  Right-Cerebral-Exterior  0
 41    41  Right-Cerebral-White-Matter 283638
 42    42  Right-Cerebral-Cortex 287665
 43    43  Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4237
 44    44  Right-Inf-Lat-Vent  342
 45    45  Right-Cerebellum-Exterior  0
 46    46  Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter 10835
 47    47  Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 62930
 48    48  Right-Thalamus  0
 49    49  Right-Thalamus-Proper 9959
 50    50  Right-Caudate 4400
 51    51  Right-Putamen 6171
 52    52  Right-Pallidum 1832
 53    53  Right-Hippocampus 4489
 54    54  Right-Amygdala 2108
 55    55  Right-Insula  0
 56    56  Right-Operculum  0
 57    57  Right-Lesion  0
 58    58  Right-Accumbens-area  731
 59    59  Right-Substancia-Nigra  0
 60    60  Right-VentralDC 4298
 61    61  Right-undetermined  0
 62    62  Right-vessel   35
 63    63  Right-choroid-plexus  0
 64    64  Right-F3orb  0
 65    65  Right-lOg  0
 66    66  Right-aOg  0
 67    67  Right-mOg  0
 68    68  Right-pOg  0
 69    69  Right-Stellate  0
 70    70  Right-Porg  0
 71    71  Right-Aorg  0
 72    72  5th-Ventricle  0
 73    73  Left-Interior  0
 74    74  Right-Interior  0
 75    75  Left-Lateral-Ventricles  0
 76    76  Right-Lateral-Ventricles  0
 77    77  WM-hypointensities 1496
 78    78  Left-WM-hypointensities    3
 79    79  Right-WM-hypointensities    8
 80    80  non-WM-hypointensities  0
 81    81  Left-non-WM-hypointensities    1
 82    82  Right-non-WM-hypointensities  0
 83    83  Left-F1  0
 84    84  Right-F1  0
 85    85  Optic-Chiasm   74
 86    86  Corpus_Callosum  0
 87    96  Left-Amygdala-Anterior  0
 88    97  Right-Amygdala-Anterior  0
 89    98  Dura  0
 90   100  Left-wm-intensity-abnormality  0
 91   101  Left-caudate-intensity-abnormality  0
 92   102  Left-putamen-intensity-abnormality  0
 93   103  Left-accumbens-intensity-abnormality  0
 94   104  Left-pallidum-intensity-abnormality  0
 95   105  Left-amygdala-intensity-abnormality  0
 96   106  Left-hippocampus-intensity-abnormality  0
 97   107  Left-thalamus-intensity-abnormality  0
 98   108  Left-VDC-intensity-abnormality  0
 99   109  Right-wm-intensity-abnormality  0
100   110  Right-caudate-intensity-abnormality  0
101   111  Right-putamen-intensity-abnormality  0
102   112  Right-accumbens-intensity-abnormality  0
103   113  Right-pallidum-intensity-abnormality  0
104   114  Right-amygdala-intensity-abnormality  0
105   115  Right-hippocampus-intensity-abnormality  0
106   116  Right-thalamus-intensity-abnormality  0
107   117  Right-VDC-intensity-abnormality  0
108   118  Epidermis  0
109   119  Conn-Tissue  0
110   120  SC-Fat/Muscle  0
111   121  Cranium  0
112   122  CSF-SA  0
113   123  Muscle  0
114   124  Ear  0
115   125  Adipose  0
116   126  Spinal-Cord  0
117   127  Soft-Tissue  0
118   128  Nerve  0
119   129  Bone  0
120   130  Air  0
121   131  Orbital-Fat  0
122   132  Tongue  0
123   133  Nasal-Structures  0
124   134  Globe  0
125   135  Teeth  0
126   136  Left-Caudate/Putamen  0
127   137  Right-Caudate/Putamen  0
128   138  Left-Claustrum  0
129   139  Right-Claustrum  0
130   140  Cornea  0
131   142  Diploe  0
132   143  Vitreous-Humor  0
133   144  Lens  0
134   145  Aqueous-Humor  0
135   146  Outer-Table  0
136   147  Inner-Table  0
137   148  Periosteum  0
138   149  Endosteum  0
139   150  R/C/S  0
140   151  Iris  0
141   152  SC-Adipose/Muscle  0
142   153  SC-Tissue  0
143   154  Orbital-Adipose  0
144   201  alveus  0
145   202  perforant_pathway  0
146   203  parasubiculum  0
147   204  presubiculum  0
148   205  subiculum  0
149   206  CA1  0
150   207  CA2  0
151   208  CA3  0
152   209  CA4  0
153   210  GC-DG  0
154   211  HATA  0
155   212  molecular_layer_subiculum  0
156   213  lateral_ventricle  0
157   214  molecular_layer_HP  0
158   215  hippocampal_fissure  0
159   216  entorhinal_cortex  0
160   217  nothing_yet  0
161   218  Amygdala  0
162   219  Cerebral_White_Matter  0
163   220  Cerebral_Cortex  0
164   221  Inf_Lat_Vent  0

Reporting on 164 segmentations
---------------------------------------------
Intensity Normalization2 Fri Jan 20 04:00:40 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_normalize -mask brain nu T1
reading from nu...
normalizing image...
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
3d normalization pass 1 of 2
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
3d normalization pass 2 of 2
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing...
writing output to T1
3D bias adjustment took 7 minutes and 57 seconds.
using MR volume brain to mask input volume...
white matter peak found at 110
gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 32 (32)
csf peak at 10, setting threshold to 62
white matter peak found at 110
gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 57 (57)
csf peak at 11, setting threshold to 62
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_mask T1 brain brain
writing masked volume to brain...
---------------------------------------------
Segmentation Fri Jan 20 04:09:01 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_segment brain wm
doing initial intensity segmentation...
using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels...
computing class statistics for intensity windows...
WM: 103.8 +- 5.3 [80.0 --> 125.0]
GM: 77.6 +- 13.1 [30.0 --> 96.0]
setting bottom of white matter range to 90.7
setting top of gray matter range to 98.4
doing initial intensity segmentation...
using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels...
using local geometry to label remaining ambiguous voxels...

reclassifying voxels using Gaussian border classifier...

removing voxels with positive offset direction...
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250
removing 1-dimensional structures...
5469 sparsely connected voxels removed...
thickening thin strands....
20 segments, 5752 filled
2307 bright non-wm voxels segmented.
5046 diagonally connected voxels added...
white matter segmentation took 10.2 minutes
writing output to wm...
---------------------------------------
mri_edit_wm_with_aseg wm aseg wm
auto filling took 0.48 minutes
reading wm segmentation from wm...
2252 additional wm voxels added
0 additional wm voxels added
SEG EDIT: 36020 voxels turned on, 65218 voxels turned off.
writing edited volume to wm....
---------------------------------------------
Fill Fri Jan 20 04:19:42 EST 2006
INFO: Uses mri/transforms/talairach.xfm
mri_fill -a ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log -xform transforms/talairach.xfm -segmentation aseg wm filled
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
logging cutting plane coordinates to ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log...
INFO: Using transforms/talairach.xfm and its offset for Talairach volume ...
using segmentation aseg...
reading input volume...done.
searching for cutting planes...voxel to talairach voxel transform
 1.031  -0.026  -0.049   2.830;
 0.037   1.121   0.170  -38.132;
 0.047  -0.163   1.066   13.963;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
voxel to talairach voxel transform
 1.031  -0.026  -0.049   2.830;
 0.037   1.121   0.170  -38.132;
 0.047  -0.163   1.066   13.963;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
Looking for area (min, max) = (350, 1400)
area[0] = 2807 (min = 350, max = 1400), aspect = 1.21 (min = 0.10, max = 0.75)
need search nearby
using seed (129, 131, 170), TAL = (-1.1, 25.5, 6.8)
talairach voxel to voxel transform
 0.967   0.028   0.040  -2.213;
-0.025   0.872  -0.140   35.254;
-0.046   0.132   0.915  -7.617;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
done.
filling left hemisphere...
filling volume: pass 1 of 3...total of 610411 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 2 of 3...total of 16099628 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 3 of 3...total of 611031 voxels filled...done.
filling right hemisphere...
filling volume: pass 1 of 3...total of 610411 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 2 of 3...total of 16099628 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 3 of 3...total of 611031 voxels filled...done.
filling degenerate left hemisphere surface locations...
1421 voxels filled
30 voxels filled
2 voxels filled
0 voxels filled
filling degenerate right hemisphere surface locations...
1421 voxels filled
30 voxels filled
2 voxels filled
0 voxels filled
refilling left hemisphere...
filling volume: pass 1 of 3...total of 0 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 2 of 3...total of 16098165 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 3 of 3...total of 612494 voxels filled...done.
refilling right hemisphere...
filling volume: pass 1 of 3...total of 0 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 2 of 3...total of 16098165 voxels filled...
filling volume: pass 3 of 3...total of 612494 voxels filled...done.
combining hemispheres...
using variable coefficient diffusion to correct hemispheric overlap...
26:  611809 ambiguous voxels remaining
9:  52621 ambiguous voxels remaining
8:  22323 ambiguous voxels remaining
7:  9080 ambiguous voxels remaining
6:  4117 ambiguous voxels remaining
5:  2116 ambiguous voxels remaining
4:  980 ambiguous voxels remaining
3:  591 ambiguous voxels remaining
2:  201 ambiguous voxels remaining
1:  0 ambiguous voxels remaining
writing output to filled...
filling took 3.8 minutes
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
reading segmented volume aseg...
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
segmentation indicates cc at (129,  131,  170) --> (-1.1, 25.5, 6.8)
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
talairach cc position changed to (-1.10, 25.49, 6.75)
ERASING BRAINSTEMseed_search_size = 9, min_neighbors = 5
search rh wm seed point around talairach space:(16.90, 25.49, 6.75) SRC: (115.73, 122.93, 160.07)
search lh wm seed point around talairach space (-19.10, 25.49, 6.75), SRC: (150.56, 122.05, 158.40)
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
Voxel coord of CC in image space is (133, 122, 159)
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: Modifying dst c_(r,a,s), using the transform dst
INFO: starting per-hemisphere operations
----- Starting Hemisphere lh --------
---------------------------------------------
Tessellate lh Fri Jan 20 04:23:32 EST 2006
mri_tessellate /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/filled 255 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
slice 50: 2907 vertices, 3155 faces
slice 60: 13043 vertices, 13505 faces
slice 70: 27122 vertices, 27715 faces
slice 80: 41698 vertices, 42286 faces
slice 90: 55172 vertices, 55708 faces
slice 100: 68416 vertices, 68978 faces
slice 110: 83034 vertices, 83681 faces
slice 120: 97689 vertices, 98377 faces
slice 130: 112276 vertices, 112983 faces
slice 140: 125974 vertices, 126655 faces
slice 150: 137832 vertices, 138454 faces
slice 160: 147724 vertices, 148351 faces
slice 170: 156984 vertices, 157558 faces
slice 180: 165175 vertices, 165736 faces
slice 190: 172294 vertices, 172812 faces
slice 200: 176278 vertices, 176705 faces
slice 210: 176827 vertices, 177164 faces
slice 220: 176827 vertices, 177164 faces
slice 230: 176827 vertices, 177164 faces
slice 240: 176827 vertices, 177164 faces
slice 250: 176827 vertices, 177164 faces
using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points...
writing /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig
using ras2vox matrix:
-1.000   0.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   1.000  -128.000;
 0.000  -1.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
---------------------------------------------
Smooth1 lh Fri Jan 20 04:23:44 EST 2006
mris_smooth /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.smoothwm
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...
writing smoothed curvature to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.curv
writing smoothed area to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.area
---------------------------------------------
Inflation1 lh Fri Jan 20 04:24:04 EST 2006
mris_inflate -dist 0 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.smoothwm /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.inflated
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
l_dist = 0.000
avg radius = 48.8 mm, total surface area = 93508 mm^2
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_spring_norm=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90
desired rms height=0.015
writing inflated surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.inflated
writing sulcal depths to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.sulc
inflation took 3.7 minutes
inflating to desired rms height = 0.015
000: dt: 0.0000, rms height=0.193, avgs=16
005: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.150, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
010: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.122, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
015: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.109, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
020: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.099, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
025: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.090, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
030: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.085, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
035: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.080, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
040: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.075, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
045: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.072, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
050: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.070, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
055: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.070, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00
060: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.069, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00

inflation complete.
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.sulc
---------------------------------------------
QSphere lh Fri Jan 20 04:27:47 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_sphere -w 0 -inflate -in 200 -q /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.inflated /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.qsphere
using write iterations = 0
inflating brain...
inflation iterations = 200
doing quick spherical unfolding.
reading original vertex positions...
unfolding cortex into spherical form...
tol=1.0e+00, host=varda, nav=0, nbrs=1, l_spring_norm=1.000, l_sphere=0.025, l_convex=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90

surface projected - minimizing metric distortion...
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.04) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.83-->2.06)
tol=1.0e-01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

201: dt: 40.84, sse: 6004.2 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18452 (%0.978:%3.00), avgs: 32
202: dt: 0.29, sse: 6001.5 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18448 (%0.969:%2.99), avgs: 32
203: dt: 0.29, sse: 5997.4 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18441 (%0.954:%2.98), avgs: 32
204: dt: 0.29, sse: 5992.2 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18437 (%0.935:%2.97), avgs: 32
205: dt: 0.29, sse: 5986.2 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18452 (%0.912:%2.97), avgs: 32
206: dt: 0.29, sse: 5979.7 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18484 (%0.886:%2.96), avgs: 32
207: dt: 0.29, sse: 5973.2 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18505 (%0.860:%2.96), avgs: 32
208: dt: 0.29, sse: 5966.8 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18509 (%0.833:%2.94), avgs: 32
209: dt: 0.29, sse: 5961.0 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18536 (%0.808:%2.93), avgs: 32
210: dt: 0.29, sse: 5956.0 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18553 (%0.784:%2.91), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.65) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.50-->2.07)
211: dt: 0.29, sse: 5952.0 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18587 (%0.764:%2.90), avgs: 32
212: dt: 45.51, sse: 5927.4 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18740 (%0.620:%2.70), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.64) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.54-->2.07)
213: dt: 2.95, sse: 5916.9 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18949 (%0.570:%2.67), avgs: 8
214: dt: 0.15, sse: 5916.6 (0.095, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 18959 (%0.570:%2.66), avgs: 8
215: dt: 0.15, sse: 5916.6 (0.094, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 19017 (%0.569:%2.67), avgs: 8
216: dt: 0.15, sse: 5916.7 (0.094, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 19058 (%0.569:%2.67), avgs: 8
217: dt: 0.15, sse: 5916.6 (0.094, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 19083 (%0.567:%2.67), avgs: 8
218: dt: 0.15, sse: 5916.1 (0.094, 25.9, 0.158), neg: 19133 (%0.564:%2.67), avgs: 8
219: dt: 0.15, sse: 5915.2 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19171 (%0.559:%2.66), avgs: 8
220: dt: 0.15, sse: 5914.2 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19213 (%0.552:%2.66), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.47) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.26-->2.07)
221: dt: 0.15, sse: 5912.9 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19253 (%0.545:%2.66), avgs: 8
222: dt: 0.15, sse: 5911.6 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19284 (%0.537:%2.65), avgs: 8
223: dt: 0.15, sse: 5910.1 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19298 (%0.529:%2.63), avgs: 8
224: dt: 1.96, sse: 5906.5 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19311 (%0.514:%2.59), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.47) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.23-->2.07)
225: dt: 0.64, sse: 5904.9 (0.094, 26.0, 0.158), neg: 19535 (%0.506:%2.60), avgs: 2
226: dt: 0.09, sse: 5903.5 (0.094, 26.1, 0.158), neg: 19610 (%0.498:%2.60), avgs: 2
227: dt: 0.09, sse: 5902.5 (0.094, 26.1, 0.158), neg: 19658 (%0.492:%2.58), avgs: 2
228: dt: 0.09, sse: 5901.9 (0.094, 26.1, 0.158), neg: 19692 (%0.489:%2.56), avgs: 2
229: dt: 0.09, sse: 5901.3 (0.094, 26.1, 0.158), neg: 19764 (%0.485:%2.56), avgs: 2
230: dt: 0.09, sse: 5900.6 (0.094, 26.2, 0.158), neg: 19881 (%0.481:%2.56), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.40) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.16-->2.07)
231: dt: 0.09, sse: 5899.9 (0.094, 26.2, 0.158), neg: 19979 (%0.477:%2.56), avgs: 2
232: dt: 0.09, sse: 5899.7 (0.094, 26.2, 0.158), neg: 20069 (%0.475:%2.55), avgs: 2
233: dt: 0.09, sse: 5899.7 (0.094, 26.2, 0.158), neg: 20151 (%0.474:%2.54), avgs: 2
234: dt: 0.09, sse: 5899.7 (0.095, 26.3, 0.158), neg: 20275 (%0.473:%2.55), avgs: 2
235: dt: 0.09, sse: 5899.7 (0.095, 26.3, 0.158), neg: 20374 (%0.473:%2.55), avgs: 2
236: dt: 0.39, sse: 5899.2 (0.095, 26.3, 0.158), neg: 20477 (%0.470:%2.56), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.39) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.10-->2.07)
237: dt: 0.02, sse: 5899.1 (0.095, 26.3, 0.158), neg: 20576 (%0.469:%2.58), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.38) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.09-->2.07)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

238: dt: 45.06, sse: 728.6 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18498 (%0.385:%2.08), avgs: 32
239: dt: 0.29, sse: 728.7 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18597 (%0.385:%2.07), avgs: 32
240: dt: 0.29, sse: 728.6 (0.095, 26.0, 0.159), neg: 18646 (%0.384:%2.07), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.38) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.37-->2.08)
241: dt: 0.29, sse: 728.2 (0.095, 26.0, 0.159), neg: 18702 (%0.382:%2.06), avgs: 32
242: dt: 0.29, sse: 727.9 (0.095, 26.0, 0.159), neg: 18720 (%0.380:%2.04), avgs: 32
243: dt: 0.29, sse: 727.8 (0.095, 26.0, 0.159), neg: 18776 (%0.380:%2.03), avgs: 32
244: dt: 0.29, sse: 727.9 (0.095, 26.0, 0.159), neg: 18823 (%0.380:%2.02), avgs: 32
245: dt: 0.29, sse: 728.3 (0.095, 26.1, 0.159), neg: 18842 (%0.381:%2.01), avgs: 32
246: dt: 0.29, sse: 728.8 (0.095, 26.1, 0.159), neg: 18874 (%0.382:%2.00), avgs: 32
247: dt: 0.29, sse: 729.3 (0.095, 26.1, 0.159), neg: 18905 (%0.384:%1.99), avgs: 32
248: dt: 0.29, sse: 729.9 (0.095, 26.1, 0.159), neg: 18929 (%0.385:%1.98), avgs: 32
249: dt: 41.59, sse: 722.5 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18387 (%0.365:%1.87), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.22) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.37-->2.08)
250: dt: 3.20, sse: 716.4 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18195 (%0.341:%1.79), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.18) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.26-->2.08)
251: dt: 0.15, sse: 717.1 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18230 (%0.344:%1.80), avgs: 8
252: dt: 0.15, sse: 717.4 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18242 (%0.344:%1.79), avgs: 8
253: dt: 0.15, sse: 717.3 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18272 (%0.344:%1.79), avgs: 8
254: dt: 0.15, sse: 716.9 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18280 (%0.343:%1.79), avgs: 8
255: dt: 0.15, sse: 716.3 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18303 (%0.341:%1.79), avgs: 8
256: dt: 0.15, sse: 715.5 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18275 (%0.338:%1.77), avgs: 8
257: dt: 0.15, sse: 714.7 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18282 (%0.336:%1.76), avgs: 8
258: dt: 0.15, sse: 713.9 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18257 (%0.333:%1.75), avgs: 8
259: dt: 0.15, sse: 713.1 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18237 (%0.331:%1.75), avgs: 8
260: dt: 0.15, sse: 712.2 (0.095, 25.9, 0.159), neg: 18216 (%0.328:%1.74), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.13) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.17-->2.08)
261: dt: 3.91, sse: 709.1 (0.095, 25.8, 0.159), neg: 18038 (%0.317:%1.69), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.11) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.19-->2.08)
262: dt: 0.41, sse: 705.0 (0.095, 25.8, 0.159), neg: 17994 (%0.301:%1.66), avgs: 2
263: dt: 0.09, sse: 703.3 (0.095, 25.8, 0.159), neg: 17994 (%0.296:%1.66), avgs: 2
264: dt: 0.09, sse: 701.6 (0.095, 25.8, 0.159), neg: 17965 (%0.289:%1.63), avgs: 2
265: dt: 0.09, sse: 700.3 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17933 (%0.285:%1.63), avgs: 2
266: dt: 0.09, sse: 698.7 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17896 (%0.279:%1.61), avgs: 2
267: dt: 0.09, sse: 696.8 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17836 (%0.273:%1.61), avgs: 2
268: dt: 0.09, sse: 694.9 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17796 (%0.266:%1.60), avgs: 2
269: dt: 0.09, sse: 693.5 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17737 (%0.261:%1.58), avgs: 2
270: dt: 0.09, sse: 692.2 (0.095, 25.7, 0.159), neg: 17692 (%0.257:%1.56), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.03) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.09-->2.08)
271: dt: 0.09, sse: 690.8 (0.095, 25.6, 0.159), neg: 17651 (%0.253:%1.55), avgs: 2
272: dt: 0.09, sse: 689.7 (0.095, 25.6, 0.159), neg: 17615 (%0.249:%1.55), avgs: 2
273: dt: 0.14, sse: 689.2 (0.095, 25.6, 0.159), neg: 17702 (%0.248:%1.56), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->7.00) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.08-->2.08)
274: dt: 0.02, sse: 689.0 (0.095, 25.6, 0.159), neg: 17743 (%0.247:%1.57), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.99) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.08-->2.08)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

275: dt: 29.64, sse: 133.4 (0.095, 25.5, 0.159), neg: 16906 (%0.222:%1.48), avgs: 32
276: dt: 5.77, sse: 130.5 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16788 (%0.212:%1.40), avgs: 32
277: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.8 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16778 (%0.210:%1.41), avgs: 32
278: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.3 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16711 (%0.209:%1.40), avgs: 32
279: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.1 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16676 (%0.208:%1.39), avgs: 32
280: dt: 0.29, sse: 128.9 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16632 (%0.208:%1.38), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.91) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.15-->2.08)
281: dt: 0.29, sse: 128.8 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16591 (%0.207:%1.37), avgs: 32
282: dt: 0.29, sse: 128.9 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16562 (%0.208:%1.37), avgs: 32
283: dt: 0.29, sse: 128.9 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16529 (%0.208:%1.36), avgs: 32
284: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.0 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16505 (%0.208:%1.36), avgs: 32
285: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.0 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16500 (%0.208:%1.36), avgs: 32
286: dt: 0.29, sse: 129.0 (0.095, 25.4, 0.159), neg: 16480 (%0.208:%1.36), avgs: 32
287: dt: 6.74, sse: 128.7 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16434 (%0.207:%1.35), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.87) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.25-->2.08)
288: dt: 3.59, sse: 126.2 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16304 (%0.198:%1.31), avgs: 8
289: dt: 1.14, sse: 124.9 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16280 (%0.193:%1.30), avgs: 8
290: dt: 0.15, sse: 124.9 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16269 (%0.193:%1.31), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.87) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.15-->2.08)
291: dt: 0.15, sse: 124.7 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16249 (%0.193:%1.30), avgs: 8
292: dt: 0.15, sse: 124.5 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16232 (%0.192:%1.30), avgs: 8
293: dt: 0.15, sse: 124.2 (0.095, 25.3, 0.159), neg: 16208 (%0.191:%1.30), avgs: 8
294: dt: 0.15, sse: 123.9 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16190 (%0.190:%1.30), avgs: 8
295: dt: 0.15, sse: 123.6 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16182 (%0.189:%1.30), avgs: 8
296: dt: 0.15, sse: 123.3 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16158 (%0.188:%1.30), avgs: 8
297: dt: 0.15, sse: 122.9 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16114 (%0.186:%1.29), avgs: 8
298: dt: 0.15, sse: 122.6 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16076 (%0.185:%1.29), avgs: 8
299: dt: 0.15, sse: 122.3 (0.095, 25.2, 0.159), neg: 16043 (%0.184:%1.29), avgs: 8
300: dt: 10.07, sse: 119.4 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15688 (%0.174:%1.21), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.85) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.16-->2.08)
301: dt: 1.26, sse: 117.9 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15650 (%0.168:%1.19), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.85) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.16-->2.08)
302: dt: 0.28, sse: 116.5 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15625 (%0.163:%1.18), avgs: 2
303: dt: 0.09, sse: 115.7 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15643 (%0.161:%1.18), avgs: 2
304: dt: 0.09, sse: 115.1 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15635 (%0.158:%1.18), avgs: 2
305: dt: 0.09, sse: 114.5 (0.095, 25.1, 0.159), neg: 15623 (%0.156:%1.18), avgs: 2
306: dt: 0.09, sse: 113.6 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15564 (%0.153:%1.17), avgs: 2
307: dt: 0.09, sse: 112.7 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15509 (%0.150:%1.16), avgs: 2
308: dt: 0.09, sse: 111.6 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15425 (%0.146:%1.14), avgs: 2
309: dt: 0.09, sse: 110.9 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15353 (%0.143:%1.13), avgs: 2
310: dt: 0.09, sse: 110.0 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15307 (%0.140:%1.13), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.77) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.07-->2.08)
311: dt: 0.09, sse: 109.4 (0.095, 25.0, 0.159), neg: 15258 (%0.138:%1.12), avgs: 2
312: dt: 0.09, sse: 108.8 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 15226 (%0.136:%1.13), avgs: 2
313: dt: 0.09, sse: 108.0 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 15197 (%0.133:%1.11), avgs: 2
314: dt: 0.03, sse: 107.9 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 15216 (%0.133:%1.12), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.73) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.07-->2.08)
315: dt: 0.00, sse: 107.9 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 15216 (%0.133:%1.12), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.73) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.07-->2.08)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

316: dt: 14.67, sse: 47.4 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 14781 (%0.126:%1.08), avgs: 32
317: dt: 2.17, sse: 47.0 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 14749 (%0.125:%1.06), avgs: 32
scaling brain by 0.581...
inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00)
000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=152.356, avgs=0
005: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.134, avgs=0
010: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.657, avgs=0
015: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.032, avgs=0
020: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.321, avgs=0
025: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.559, avgs=0
030: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.771, avgs=0
035: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.969, avgs=0
040: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.162, avgs=0
045: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.352, avgs=0
050: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.543, avgs=0
055: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.737, avgs=0
060: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.934, avgs=0
065: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.136, avgs=0
070: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.340, avgs=0
075: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.542, avgs=0
080: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.753, avgs=0
085: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.972, avgs=0
090: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.195, avgs=0
095: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.422, avgs=0
100: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.653, avgs=0
105: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.888, avgs=0
110: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.127, avgs=0
115: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.370, avgs=0
120: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.616, avgs=0
125: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.867, avgs=0
130: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.121, avgs=0
135: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.379, avgs=0
140: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.641, avgs=0
145: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.907, avgs=0
150: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.177, avgs=0
155: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.450, avgs=0
160: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.728, avgs=0
165: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.009, avgs=0
170: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.294, avgs=0
175: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=126.584, avgs=0
180: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=125.880, avgs=0
185: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=125.181, avgs=0
190: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=124.485, avgs=0
195: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=123.793, avgs=0
200: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=123.104, avgs=0

spherical inflation complete.
epoch 1 (K=20.0), pass 1, starting sse = 6052.48
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.03/37 = 0.00069
epoch 2 (K=80.0), pass 1, starting sse = 749.26
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.08/37 = 0.00217
epoch 3 (K=320.0), pass 1, starting sse = 140.26
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.23/41 = 0.00562
epoch 4 (K=1280.0), pass 1, starting sse = 49.45
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integr318: dt: 0.29, sse: 46.6 (0.095, 24.9, 0.159), neg: 14693 (%0.124:%1.06), avgs: 32
319: dt: 0.29, sse: 46.6 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14657 (%0.123:%1.05), avgs: 32
320: dt: 0.29, sse: 46.8 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14619 (%0.124:%1.05), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.67) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.17-->2.08)
321: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.0 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14576 (%0.125:%1.05), avgs: 32
322: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.2 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14546 (%0.125:%1.05), avgs: 32
323: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.4 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14512 (%0.126:%1.05), avgs: 32
324: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.6 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14469 (%0.126:%1.05), avgs: 32
325: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.8 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14444 (%0.127:%1.05), avgs: 32
326: dt: 0.29, sse: 47.9 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14420 (%0.128:%1.05), avgs: 32
327: dt: 0.29, sse: 48.1 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14396 (%0.128:%1.05), avgs: 32
328: dt: 10.53, sse: 47.7 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14358 (%0.127:%1.05), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.60) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.34-->2.08)
329: dt: 3.08, sse: 45.7 (0.095, 24.8, 0.159), neg: 14288 (%0.120:%1.03), avgs: 8
330: dt: 0.41, sse: 45.0 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14266 (%0.118:%1.03), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.59) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.20-->2.08)
331: dt: 0.15, sse: 45.0 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14269 (%0.118:%1.03), avgs: 8
332: dt: 0.15, sse: 44.9 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14259 (%0.117:%1.04), avgs: 8
333: dt: 0.15, sse: 44.7 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14244 (%0.117:%1.04), avgs: 8
334: dt: 0.15, sse: 44.5 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14227 (%0.116:%1.04), avgs: 8
335: dt: 0.15, sse: 44.3 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14211 (%0.115:%1.04), avgs: 8
336: dt: 0.15, sse: 44.0 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14222 (%0.115:%1.05), avgs: 8
337: dt: 0.15, sse: 43.8 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14228 (%0.114:%1.06), avgs: 8
338: dt: 0.15, sse: 43.5 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14207 (%0.113:%1.06), avgs: 8
339: dt: 0.15, sse: 43.1 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14202 (%0.111:%1.06), avgs: 8
340: dt: 0.15, sse: 42.7 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14184 (%0.110:%1.05), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.54) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.19-->2.08)
341: dt: 3.89, sse: 41.9 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14089 (%0.107:%1.04), avgs: 8
342: dt: 0.41, sse: 41.6 (0.095, 24.7, 0.159), neg: 14099 (%0.106:%1.03), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.53) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.14-->2.08)
343: dt: 0.27, sse: 40.2 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13978 (%0.102:%0.99), avgs: 2
344: dt: 0.06, sse: 39.6 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13968 (%0.100:%0.97), avgs: 2
345: dt: 0.23, sse: 39.1 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13950 (%0.098:%0.97), avgs: 2
346: dt: 0.08, sse: 38.7 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13976 (%0.097:%0.96), avgs: 2
347: dt: 0.08, sse: 38.6 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 14007 (%0.096:%0.98), avgs: 2
348: dt: 0.09, sse: 38.3 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13984 (%0.096:%0.98), avgs: 2
349: dt: 0.09, sse: 38.0 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 14010 (%0.094:%1.00), avgs: 2
350: dt: 0.09, sse: 37.6 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13997 (%0.093:%1.00), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.48) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.07-->2.08)
351: dt: 0.09, sse: 37.1 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13958 (%0.091:%1.00), avgs: 2
352: dt: 0.09, sse: 36.6 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13889 (%0.089:%0.98), avgs: 2
353: dt: 0.09, sse: 36.1 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13859 (%0.088:%0.98), avgs: 2
354: dt: 0.09, sse: 35.8 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13836 (%0.087:%0.99), avgs: 2
355: dt: 0.09, sse: 35.3 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13757 (%0.085:%0.98), avgs: 2
356: dt: 0.09, sse: 34.9 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13757 (%0.084:%0.98), avgs: 2
357: dt: 0.09, sse: 34.5 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13746 (%0.082:%0.98), avgs: 2
358: dt: 0.07, sse: 34.4 (0.095, 24.6, 0.159), neg: 13823 (%0.082:%1.00), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.37) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.05-->2.08)
359: dt: 0.01, sse: 34.4 (0.095, 24.5, 0.159), neg: 13853 (%0.082:%1.01), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.82 +- 0.54 (0.00-->6.37) (max @ vno 78064 --> 78078)
face area 0.09 +- 0.13 (-0.05-->2.08)
359: dt: 0.00, sse: 5844.3 (0.095, 24.5, 0.159), neg: 13853 (%0.082:%1.01), avgs: 32
writing spherical brain to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.qsphere
spherical transformation took 0.59 hours
ating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.31/44 = 0.00694
final distance error %30.57
optimization complete.
unfolding took 0.47 hours
---------------------------------------------
Fix Topology lh Fri Jan 20 05:02:59 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_fix_topology -ga EEsurf lh

*************************************************************
Setting options

using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters

*************************************************************
Topology Correction Parameters
retessellation mode:           genetic search
number of patches/generation : 10
number of generations :        10
surface mri loglikelihood coefficient :         1.0
volume mri loglikelihood coefficient :          10.0
normal dot loglikelihood coefficient :          1.0
quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0
volume resolution :                             2
eliminate vertices during search :              1
initial patch selection :                       1
select all defect vertices :                    0
ordering dependant retessellation:              0
use precomputed edge table :                    0
smooth retessellated patch :                    2
match retessellated patch :                     1
verbose mode :                                  0

*************************************************************
reading input surface /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.qsphere...
before topology correction, eno=-315 (nv=176827, nf=354328, ne=531470, g=158)
vertex 28108: degenerate normal
vertex 141755: degenerate normal
vertex 173356: degenerate normal
vertex 28108: degenerate normal
vertex 141755: degenerate normal
vertex 173356: degenerate normal
using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface...

Correction of the Topology
Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done
Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 9 iterations
marking ambiguous vertices...
35217 ambiguous faces found in tessellation
segmenting defects...
189 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions...
vertex 28108: degenerate normal
vertex 141755: degenerate normal
vertex 173356: degenerate normal
analyzing neighboring defects...
      -merging segment 16 into 13
      -merging segment 65 into 36
      -merging segment 54 into 46
      -merging segment 55 into 46
      -merging segment 69 into 68
      -merging segment 72 into 68
      -merging segment 147 into 73
      -merging segment 91 into 78
      -merging segment 96 into 93
      -merging segment 99 into 94
      -merging segment 106 into 94
      -merging segment 107 into 94
      -merging segment 112 into 94
      -merging segment 118 into 94
      -merging segment 123 into 114
      -merging segment 119 into 115
      -merging segment 129 into 115
      -merging segment 126 into 115
      -merging segment 131 into 115
      -merging segment 135 into 125
      -merging segment 154 into 125
      -merging segment 140 into 128
      -merging segment 138 into 134
      -merging segment 174 into 172
      -merging segment 179 into 172
      -merging segment 187 into 185
      -merging segment 188 into 186
162 defects to be corrected 
0 vertices coincident
Computing Initial Surface Statistics
      -face       loglikelihood: -8.5809  (-4.2904)
      -vertex     loglikelihood: -5.5238  (-2.7619)
      -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.6220  (-3.6220)
      -quad curv  loglikelihood: -6.3352  (-3.1676)
      Total Loglikelihood : -24.0619

CORRECTING DEFECT 0
Computing statistics for defect 0 [ (144,142,48) - 93.057 ]
      -white ( 97.40 , 3.45 ) 
      -gray ( 80.71 , 13.33 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (80.708015 [log = -3.524489 ]- 97.400993 [log = -2.134010 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 0 with 268 vertices (convex hull=271).
1889 of 33889 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 30 by 31 by 31 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 206 edges
                 cluster 1 has 86 edges
                 cluster 2 has 29 edges
                 cluster 3 has 25 edges
                 cluster 4 has 17 edges
l_mri = 1.00 l_unmri = 10.00 l_curv = 1.00 l_qcurv = 1.00 
PATCH #:000:  FITNESS:   -91.62
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 258)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  12 (out of 452)
              BEST PATCH #: 243 (out of 500 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 0, we have euler=-171 (155690,459305,303444) : difference with theory (-159) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 1
Computing statistics for defect 1 [ (138,149,48) - 90.153 ]
      -white ( 98.51 , 3.99 ) 
      -gray ( 79.56 , 33.04 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (79.557266 [log = -3.671494 ]- 98.509918 [log = -2.226817 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 1 with 27 vertices (convex hull=46).
0 of 351 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 15 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 23 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:001:  FITNESS:   -95.69
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 318)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 73)
              BEST PATCH #: 438 (out of 616 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 1, we have euler=-170 (155697,459343,303476) : difference with theory (-158) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 2
Computing statistics for defect 2 [ (128,141,50) - 94.823 ]
      -white ( 97.89 , 2.97 ) 
      -gray ( 88.24 , 4.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.236000 [log = -2.441631 ]- 97.885796 [log = -2.014755 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 2 with 120 vertices (convex hull=156).
845 of 6295 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 22 by 21 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 91 edges
                 cluster 1 has 24 edges
                 cluster 2 has 11 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
                 cluster 4 has 7 edges
PATCH #:002:  FITNESS:   -71.29
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 240)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 125)
              BEST PATCH #: 201 (out of 466 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 2, we have euler=-169 (155743,459553,303641) : difference with theory (-157) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 3
Computing statistics for defect 3 [ (134,153,47) - 94.586 ]
      -white ( 98.38 , 3.75 ) 
      -gray ( 82.19 , 34.18 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (82.192261 [log = -3.543953 ]- 98.378632 [log = -2.211757 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 3 with 15 vertices (convex hull=24).
3 of 102 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
PATCH #:003:  FITNESS:   -83.03
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 196)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 35)
              BEST PATCH #: 198 (out of 382 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 3, we have euler=-168 (155745,459569,303656) : difference with theory (-156) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 4
Computing statistics for defect 4 [ (141,133,49) - 93.037 ]
      -white ( 97.39 , 2.98 ) 
      -gray ( 87.16 , 6.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.156319 [log = -2.793294 ]- 97.389160 [log = -1.962523 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 4 with 48 vertices (convex hull=77).
55 of 1073 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 38 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
PATCH #:004:  FITNESS:   -75.55
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 284)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 57)
              BEST PATCH #: 366 (out of 550 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 4, we have euler=-167 (155756,459630,303707) : difference with theory (-155) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 5
Computing statistics for defect 5 [ (133,122,50) - 93.939 ]
      -white ( 98.48 , 3.10 ) 
      -gray ( 87.74 , 5.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.738976 [log = -2.604379 ]- 98.484467 [log = -2.057662 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 5 with 37 vertices (convex hull=56).
8 of 658 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 41 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:005:  FITNESS:   -71.28
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 221)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 47)
              BEST PATCH #: 168 (out of 431 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 5, we have euler=-166 (155769,459690,303755) : difference with theory (-154) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 6
Computing statistics for defect 6 [ (129,151,53) - 93.076 ]
      -white ( 96.46 , 2.88 ) 
      -gray ( 87.04 , 4.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.043854 [log = -2.405766 ]- 96.456154 [log = -2.004866 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 6 with 165 vertices (convex hull=202).
1443 of 12087 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 25 by 26 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 7 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 73 edges
                 cluster 1 has 54 edges
                 cluster 2 has 25 edges
                 cluster 3 has 19 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
PATCH #:006:  FITNESS:   -74.89
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 286)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  11 (out of 158)
              BEST PATCH #: 283 (out of 552 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 6, we have euler=-165 (155819,459948,303964) : difference with theory (-153) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 7
Computing statistics for defect 7 [ (135,148,49) - 96.990 ]
      -white ( 96.87 , 2.75 ) 
      -gray ( 88.39 , 3.54 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.386528 [log = -2.253615 ]- 96.874374 [log = -1.949112 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 7 with 11 vertices (convex hull=27).
4 of 51 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:007:  FITNESS:   -63.17
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 284)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 368 (out of 550 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 7, we have euler=-164 (155821,459960,303975) : difference with theory (-152) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 8
Computing statistics for defect 8 [ (139,154,49) - 92.171 ]
      -white ( 99.87 , 3.69 ) 
      -gray ( 81.71 , 10.57 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (81.708405 [log = -3.395996 ]- 99.870628 [log = -2.161927 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 8 with 15 vertices (convex hull=30).
3 of 102 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 10 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
PATCH #:008:  FITNESS:   -79.86
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 187)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 18)
              BEST PATCH #: 193 (out of 365 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 8, we have euler=-163 (155823,459976,303990) : difference with theory (-151) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 9
Computing statistics for defect 9 [ (139,159,50) - 91.549 ]
      -white ( 98.71 , 3.68 ) 
      -gray ( 80.14 , 11.00 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (80.141418 [log = -3.838115 ]- 98.712898 [log = -2.213235 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 9 with 65 vertices (convex hull=94).
151 of 1929 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 61 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:009:  FITNESS:   -83.54
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 370)
              CROSSOVERS: 8 (out of 336)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  7 (out of 51)
              BEST PATCH #: 447 (out of 716 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 9, we have euler=-162 (155839,460063,304062) : difference with theory (-150) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 10
Computing statistics for defect 10 [ (139,110,52) - 94.540 ]
      -white ( 98.13 , 3.20 ) 
      -gray ( 88.41 , 4.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.410957 [log = -2.322176 ]- 98.133652 [log = -2.094542 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 10 with 74 vertices (convex hull=98).
288 of 2413 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 16 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 89 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
PATCH #:010:  FITNESS:   -66.84
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 286)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 54)
              BEST PATCH #: 293 (out of 552 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 10, we have euler=-161 (155862,460176,304153) : difference with theory (-149) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 11
Computing statistics for defect 11 [ (160,125,51) - 93.242 ]
      -white ( 97.40 , 4.38 ) 
      -gray ( 86.83 , 10.71 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.831429 [log = -3.151469 ]- 97.404900 [log = -2.351449 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 11 with 43 vertices (convex hull=66).
54 of 849 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 29 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
PATCH #:011:  FITNESS:   -77.19
              MUTATIONS: 9 (out of 510)
              CROSSOVERS: 12 (out of 464)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 44)
              BEST PATCH #: 804 (out of 984 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 11, we have euler=-160 (155871,460229,304198) : difference with theory (-148) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 12
Computing statistics for defect 12 [ (156,131,52) - 93.871 ]
      -white ( 98.27 , 4.01 ) 
      -gray ( 87.77 , 7.91 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.772278 [log = -2.598760 ]- 98.265816 [log = -2.358462 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 12 with 52 vertices (convex hull=77).
138 of 1188 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 33 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:012:  FITNESS:   -71.34
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 267)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 34)
              BEST PATCH #: 343 (out of 517 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 12, we have euler=-159 (155883,460298,304256) : difference with theory (-147) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 13
Computing statistics for defect 13 [ (159,136,56) - 94.398 ]
      -white ( 97.95 , 3.95 ) 
      -gray ( 85.57 , 11.36 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (85.566132 [log = -3.750880 ]- 97.954910 [log = -2.302671 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 13 with 336 vertices (convex hull=357).
6965 of 49315 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 43 by 34 by 33 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 154 edges
                 cluster 1 has 127 edges
                 cluster 2 has 42 edges
                 cluster 3 has 23 edges
                 cluster 4 has 23 edges
                 cluster 5 has 18 edges
                 cluster 6 has 17 edges
                 cluster 7 has 11 edges
                 cluster 8 has 11 edges
                 cluster 9 has 8 edges
PATCH #:013:  FITNESS:   -79.71
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 210)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 463)
              BEST PATCH #: 143 (out of 412 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 13, we have euler=-157 (156031,460931,304743) : difference with theory (-146) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 14
Computing statistics for defect 14 [ (158,108,52) - 93.084 ]
      -white ( 97.65 , 3.47 ) 
      -gray ( 88.93 , 4.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.934273 [log = -2.434607 ]- 97.651604 [log = -2.270287 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 14 with 10 vertices (convex hull=26).
2 of 43 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
PATCH #:014:  FITNESS:   -68.85
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 30)
              BEST PATCH #: 95 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 14, we have euler=-156 (156033,460942,304753) : difference with theory (-145) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 15
Computing statistics for defect 15 [ (127,157,52) - 92.065 ]
      -white ( 96.72 , 3.83 ) 
      -gray ( 83.48 , 8.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (83.484978 [log = -2.944113 ]- 96.719772 [log = -2.231447 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 15 with 20 vertices (convex hull=34).
1 of 189 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 9 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 14 edges
                 cluster 1 has 5 edges
PATCH #:015:  FITNESS:   -76.11
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 318)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 52)
              BEST PATCH #: 436 (out of 616 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 15, we have euler=-155 (156040,460973,304778) : difference with theory (-144) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 16
Computing statistics for defect 16 [ (157,117,53) - 97.445 ]
      -white ( 106.23 , 36.12 ) 
      -gray ( 91.22 , 3.65 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.221657 [log = -2.307895 ]- 106.233315 [log = -3.028182 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 16 with 4 vertices (convex hull=9).
0 of 6 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 5 by 5 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:016:  FITNESS:   -28.11
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 90)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 80)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 0 (out of 180 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 16, we have euler=-154 (156040,460974,304780) : difference with theory (-143) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 17
Computing statistics for defect 17 [ (160,113,54) - 93.805 ]
      -white ( 97.54 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 91.87 , 34.83 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.869392 [log = -2.860765 ]- 97.535606 [log = -2.022665 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 17 with 8 vertices (convex hull=16).
1 of 27 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 6 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
PATCH #:017:  FITNESS:   -73.94
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 305)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 411 (out of 587 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 17, we have euler=-153 (156041,460982,304788) : difference with theory (-142) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 18
Computing statistics for defect 18 [ (160,146,58) - 94.932 ]
      -white ( 98.24 , 3.59 ) 
      -gray ( 88.91 , 6.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.911842 [log = -2.550839 ]- 98.239075 [log = -2.228848 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 18 with 155 vertices (convex hull=190).
883 of 11052 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 22 by 23 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 129 edges
                 cluster 1 has 28 edges
                 cluster 2 has 21 edges
                 cluster 3 has 15 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:018:  FITNESS:   -69.18
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 241)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 140)
              BEST PATCH #: 202 (out of 467 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 18, we have euler=-152 (156104,461263,305007) : difference with theory (-141) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 19
Computing statistics for defect 19 [ (160,152,56) - 92.932 ]
      -white ( 96.88 , 3.78 ) 
      -gray ( 84.75 , 10.75 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (84.753731 [log = -3.548877 ]- 96.881050 [log = -2.096840 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 19 with 72 vertices (convex hull=112).
154 of 2402 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 19 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 20 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
                 cluster 3 has 8 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:019:  FITNESS:   -75.10
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 470)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 424)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  15 (out of 59)
              BEST PATCH #: 720 (out of 904 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 19, we have euler=-151 (156113,461336,305072) : difference with theory (-140) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 20
Computing statistics for defect 20 [ (134,104,56) - 93.027 ]
      -white ( 95.91 , 3.30 ) 
      -gray ( 89.61 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.607910 [log = -2.074460 ]- 95.911476 [log = -2.128196 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 20 with 16 vertices (convex hull=26).
18 of 102 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 7 edges
PATCH #:020:  FITNESS:   -69.93
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 99)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 88)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 59)
              BEST PATCH #: 19 (out of 197 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 20, we have euler=-150 (156115,461355,305090) : difference with theory (-139) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 21
Computing statistics for defect 21 [ (129,142,56) - 92.474 ]
      -white ( 97.25 , 2.81 ) 
      -gray ( 89.14 , 3.57 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.135666 [log = -2.137734 ]- 97.249557 [log = -1.902978 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 21 with 78 vertices (convex hull=110).
205 of 2798 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 12 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 80 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:021:  FITNESS:   -63.32
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 213)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 71)
              BEST PATCH #: 148 (out of 415 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 21, we have euler=-150 (156142,461488,305196) : difference with theory (-138) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 22
Computing statistics for defect 22 [ (143,152,56) - 93.904 ]
      -white ( 100.65 , 3.31 ) 
      -gray ( 90.97 , 2.89 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.972328 [log = -2.012575 ]- 100.647285 [log = -2.135885 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 22 with 14 vertices (convex hull=30).
1 of 90 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:022:  FITNESS:   -61.35
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 293)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 264)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 11)
              BEST PATCH #: 387 (out of 567 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 22, we have euler=-149 (156144,461503,305210) : difference with theory (-137) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 23
Computing statistics for defect 23 [ (143,157,56) - 97.264 ]
      -white ( 102.03 , 3.35 ) 
      -gray ( 90.89 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.887802 [log = -2.021270 ]- 102.032028 [log = -2.093481 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 23 with 8 vertices (convex hull=19).
0 of 28 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 7 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
PATCH #:023:  FITNESS:   -65.90
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 126)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 8)
              BEST PATCH #: 70 (out of 248 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 23, we have euler=-148 (156145,461510,305217) : difference with theory (-136) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 24
Computing statistics for defect 24 [ (155,160,59) - 93.828 ]
      -white ( 98.67 , 4.06 ) 
      -gray ( 88.66 , 7.49 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.655403 [log = -2.520322 ]- 98.665924 [log = -2.308586 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 24 with 157 vertices (convex hull=179).
835 of 11411 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 28 by 25 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 129 edges
                 cluster 1 has 41 edges
                 cluster 2 has 20 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
PATCH #:024:  FITNESS:   -76.14
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 300)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  12 (out of 275)
              BEST PATCH #: 321 (out of 582 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 24, we have euler=-147 (156202,461771,305422) : difference with theory (-135) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 25
Computing statistics for defect 25 [ (171,125,58) - 93.728 ]
      -white ( 99.42 , 3.12 ) 
      -gray ( 91.05 , 3.91 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.048698 [log = -1.988219 ]- 99.419273 [log = -2.117766 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 25 with 24 vertices (convex hull=45).
8 of 268 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
PATCH #:025:  FITNESS:   -65.61
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 142)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 27)
              BEST PATCH #: 106 (out of 280 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 25, we have euler=-146 (156211,461810,305453) : difference with theory (-134) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 26
Computing statistics for defect 26 [ (168,140,60) - 93.890 ]
      -white ( 97.39 , 3.65 ) 
      -gray ( 84.32 , 11.86 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (84.315819 [log = -4.194564 ]- 97.390022 [log = -2.210573 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 26 with 123 vertices (convex hull=153).
692 of 6811 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 23 by 20 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 115 edges
                 cluster 1 has 39 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:026:  FITNESS:   -80.84
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 440)
              CROSSOVERS: 10 (out of 400)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  25 (out of 139)
              BEST PATCH #: 583 (out of 850 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 26, we have euler=-145 (156234,461952,305573) : difference with theory (-133) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 27
Computing statistics for defect 27 [ (135,153,59) - 91.858 ]
      -white ( 96.10 , 2.53 ) 
      -gray ( 89.51 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.512695 [log = -2.003917 ]- 96.101418 [log = -1.834259 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 27 with 12 vertices (convex hull=29).
0 of 66 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 6 edges
PATCH #:027:  FITNESS:   -60.86
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 117)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 9)
              BEST PATCH #: 55 (out of 231 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 27, we have euler=-144 (156235,461963,305584) : difference with theory (-132) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 28
Computing statistics for defect 28 [ (126,117,60) - 94.076 ]
      -white ( 96.90 , 2.85 ) 
      -gray ( 90.15 , 2.97 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.153740 [log = -1.986628 ]- 96.899162 [log = -2.018006 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 28 with 10 vertices (convex hull=23).
2 of 43 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 7 by 9 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:028:  FITNESS:   -63.65
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 150)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 124 (out of 296 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 28, we have euler=-143 (156235,461970,305592) : difference with theory (-131) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 29
Computing statistics for defect 29 [ (130,153,60) - 93.414 ]
      -white ( 95.36 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 88.52 , 3.12 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.524185 [log = -2.076683 ]- 95.362770 [log = -1.966098 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 29 with 39 vertices (convex hull=61).
22 of 719 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 44 edges
PATCH #:029:  FITNESS:   -64.37
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 173)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 27)
              BEST PATCH #: 163 (out of 343 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 29, we have euler=-142 (156247,462030,305641) : difference with theory (-130) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 30
Computing statistics for defect 30 [ (129,129,63) - 93.581 ]
      -white ( 97.29 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 89.93 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.933655 [log = -2.045854 ]- 97.290268 [log = -2.001654 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 30 with 120 vertices (convex hull=158).
1206 of 5934 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 23 by 22 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 9 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 18 edges
                 cluster 1 has 18 edges
                 cluster 2 has 11 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
                 cluster 4 has 9 edges
                 cluster 5 has 8 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
                 cluster 8 has 5 edges
PATCH #:030:  FITNESS:   -65.79
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 248)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 169)
              BEST PATCH #: 219 (out of 482 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 30, we have euler=-141 (156287,462230,305802) : difference with theory (-129) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 31
Computing statistics for defect 31 [ (130,147,62) - 91.647 ]
      -white ( 96.05 , 2.99 ) 
      -gray ( 88.88 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.884048 [log = -2.073969 ]- 96.053001 [log = -2.027642 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 31 with 161 vertices (convex hull=181).
1312 of 11568 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 23 by 17 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 236 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:031:  FITNESS:   -64.63
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 268)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  18 (out of 130)
              BEST PATCH #: 247 (out of 518 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 31, we have euler=-140 (156338,462480,306002) : difference with theory (-128) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 32
Computing statistics for defect 32 [ (129,108,64) - 96.476 ]
      -white ( 99.28 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.52 , 2.65 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.524422 [log = -1.915358 ]- 99.275703 [log = -2.060458 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 32 with 79 vertices (convex hull=115).
176 of 2905 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 21 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 70 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:032:  FITNESS:   -61.85
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 275)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 102)
              BEST PATCH #: 270 (out of 533 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 32, we have euler=-139 (156361,462601,306101) : difference with theory (-127) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 33
Computing statistics for defect 33 [ (134,137,61) - 92.029 ]
      -white ( 96.43 , 2.58 ) 
      -gray ( 88.03 , 3.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.030746 [log = -2.275545 ]- 96.433380 [log = -1.874804 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 33 with 13 vertices (convex hull=28).
0 of 78 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 6 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 11 edges
PATCH #:033:  FITNESS:   -63.26
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 331)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 451 (out of 637 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 33, we have euler=-138 (156363,462616,306115) : difference with theory (-126) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 34
Computing statistics for defect 34 [ (142,162,62) - 100.305 ]
      -white ( 99.59 , 2.83 ) 
      -gray ( 90.28 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.278091 [log = -2.011944 ]- 99.591789 [log = -1.970209 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 34 with 13 vertices (convex hull=29).
1 of 77 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
PATCH #:034:  FITNESS:   -84.63
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 170)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 11)
              BEST PATCH #: 162 (out of 332 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 34, we have euler=-137 (156365,462630,306128) : difference with theory (-125) = 12 


CORRECTING DEFECT 35
Computing statistics for defect 35 [ (133,135,73) - 92.958 ]
      -white ( 96.66 , 3.03 ) 
      -gray ( 89.18 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.177879 [log = -2.012964 ]- 96.662132 [log = -2.039241 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 35 with 305 vertices (convex hull=326).
5394 of 40966 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 38 by 49 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 203 edges
                 cluster 1 has 37 edges
                 cluster 2 has 31 edges
                 cluster 3 has 22 edges
                 cluster 4 has 17 edges
                 cluster 5 has 11 edges
                 cluster 6 has 10 edges
                 cluster 7 has 9 edges
                 cluster 8 has 9 edges
                 cluster 9 has 9 edges
PATCH #:035:  FITNESS:   -67.09
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 223)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 479)
              BEST PATCH #: 162 (out of 433 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 35, we have euler=-137 (156497,463202,306568) : difference with theory (-124) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 36
Computing statistics for defect 36 [ (165,98,65) - 93.928 ]
      -white ( 97.32 , 3.58 ) 
      -gray ( 88.35 , 6.79 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.351944 [log = -3.039778 ]- 97.316521 [log = -2.213689 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 36 with 23 vertices (convex hull=41).
4 of 249 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:036:  FITNESS:   -74.23
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 124)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 62 (out of 246 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 36, we have euler=-136 (156504,463236,306596) : difference with theory (-123) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 37
Computing statistics for defect 37 [ (133,121,64) - 92.257 ]
      -white ( 97.82 , 2.63 ) 
      -gray ( 88.68 , 2.92 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.679581 [log = -1.979830 ]- 97.824364 [log = -1.853135 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 37 with 11 vertices (convex hull=29).
6 of 49 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 7 by 10 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:037:  FITNESS:   -59.85
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 215)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 243 (out of 417 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 37, we have euler=-135 (156504,463245,306606) : difference with theory (-122) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 38
Computing statistics for defect 38 [ (174,142,66) - 94.983 ]
      -white ( 99.39 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 91.54 , 3.36 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.540535 [log = -1.909423 ]- 99.388069 [log = -2.221911 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 38 with 109 vertices (convex hull=142).
592 of 5294 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 22 by 18 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 114 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:038:  FITNESS:   -66.24
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 238)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 129)
              BEST PATCH #: 203 (out of 464 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 38, we have euler=-134 (156548,463444,306762) : difference with theory (-121) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 39
Computing statistics for defect 39 [ (127,85,68) - 92.849 ]
      -white ( 98.81 , 3.73 ) 
      -gray ( 88.68 , 4.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.675217 [log = -2.134269 ]- 98.806610 [log = -2.217226 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 39 with 95 vertices (convex hull=109).
44 of 4421 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 42 by 26 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 138 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:039:  FITNESS:   -64.81
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 365)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  16 (out of 274)
              BEST PATCH #: 436 (out of 703 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 39, we have euler=-133 (156575,463576,306868) : difference with theory (-120) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 40
Computing statistics for defect 40 [ (139,136,65) - 93.195 ]
      -white ( 96.90 , 2.79 ) 
      -gray ( 90.29 , 3.20 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.287689 [log = -2.130445 ]- 96.896210 [log = -1.893131 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 40 with 14 vertices (convex hull=28).
7 of 84 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
PATCH #:040:  FITNESS:   -59.55
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 161)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 143 (out of 315 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 40, we have euler=-132 (156578,463594,306884) : difference with theory (-119) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 41
Computing statistics for defect 41 [ (129,142,67) - 94.455 ]
      -white ( 95.95 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 88.65 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.652641 [log = -2.017609 ]- 95.952026 [log = -2.003207 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 41 with 24 vertices (convex hull=47).
11 of 265 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 15 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 8 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
PATCH #:041:  FITNESS:   -63.58
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 372)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 336)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 36)
              BEST PATCH #: 536 (out of 718 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 41, we have euler=-131 (156583,463625,306911) : difference with theory (-118) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 42
Computing statistics for defect 42 [ (165,143,66) - 95.962 ]
      -white ( 101.86 , 3.74 ) 
      -gray ( 93.13 , 2.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (93.131828 [log = -2.002133 ]- 101.862556 [log = -2.227883 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 42 with 37 vertices (convex hull=62).
37 of 629 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:042:  FITNESS:   -68.71
              MUTATIONS: 8 (out of 229)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 33)
              BEST PATCH #: 263 (out of 447 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 42, we have euler=-130 (156594,463680,306956) : difference with theory (-117) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 43
Computing statistics for defect 43 [ (140,149,70) - 95.184 ]
      -white ( 99.03 , 3.24 ) 
      -gray ( 91.07 , 3.00 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.074913 [log = -2.033450 ]- 99.028023 [log = -2.131111 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 43 with 83 vertices (convex hull=119).
172 of 3231 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 21 by 21 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 65 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:043:  FITNESS:   -64.09
              MUTATIONS: 9 (out of 711)
              CROSSOVERS: 9 (out of 640)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  23 (out of 119)
              BEST PATCH #: 1179 (out of 1361 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 43, we have euler=-129 (156603,463755,307023) : difference with theory (-116) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 44
Computing statistics for defect 44 [ (152,159,66) - 95.251 ]
      -white ( 99.45 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 91.75 , 2.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.749451 [log = -1.937657 ]- 99.449265 [log = -1.994477 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 44 with 24 vertices (convex hull=46).
18 of 258 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 11 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:044:  FITNESS:   -63.46
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 308)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 280)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 23)
              BEST PATCH #: 416 (out of 598 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 44, we have euler=-128 (156608,463786,307050) : difference with theory (-115) = 13 


CORRECTING DEFECT 45
Computing statistics for defect 45 [ (139,127,73) - 93.810 ]
      -white ( 97.78 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 89.60 , 2.98 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.604050 [log = -2.001674 ]- 97.779495 [log = -2.123006 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 45 with 197 vertices (convex hull=242).
2262 of 17044 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 39 by 27 by 29 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (7 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 34 edges
                 cluster 2 has 22 edges
                 cluster 3 has 15 edges
                 cluster 4 has 14 edges
                 cluster 5 has 12 edges
                 cluster 6 has 12 edges
                 cluster 7 has 11 edges
                 cluster 8 has 9 edges
                 cluster 9 has 7 edges
PATCH #:045:  FITNESS:   -66.23
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 239)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 366)
              BEST PATCH #: 198 (out of 465 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 45, we have euler=-125 (156679,464124,307320) : difference with theory (-114) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 46
Computing statistics for defect 46 [ (181,131,67) - 94.728 ]
      -white ( 99.28 , 3.60 ) 
      -gray ( 90.56 , 4.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.562477 [log = -2.088072 ]- 99.282349 [log = -2.178854 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 46 with 50 vertices (convex hull=69).
56 of 1169 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 11 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 30 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:046:  FITNESS:   -68.01
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 193)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 39)
              BEST PATCH #: 114 (out of 379 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 46, we have euler=-124 (156697,464207,307386) : difference with theory (-113) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 47
Computing statistics for defect 47 [ (144,85,70) - 92.022 ]
      -white ( 99.46 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 86.26 , 5.63 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.264977 [log = -2.783888 ]- 99.461006 [log = -2.073100 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 47 with 101 vertices (convex hull=139).
143 of 4907 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 15 by 24 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 108 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:047:  FITNESS:   -70.96
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 171)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 71)
              BEST PATCH #: 64 (out of 333 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 47, we have euler=-123 (156736,464383,307524) : difference with theory (-112) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 48
Computing statistics for defect 48 [ (134,145,69) - 94.567 ]
      -white ( 97.07 , 2.58 ) 
      -gray ( 89.37 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.366714 [log = -2.055386 ]- 97.067513 [log = -1.878803 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 48 with 20 vertices (convex hull=33).
8 of 182 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 24 edges
PATCH #:048:  FITNESS:   -62.52
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 330)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 29)
              BEST PATCH #: 464 (out of 636 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 48, we have euler=-122 (156743,464414,307549) : difference with theory (-111) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 49
Computing statistics for defect 49 [ (136,79,70) - 91.540 ]
      -white ( 97.48 , 4.49 ) 
      -gray ( 86.99 , 6.41 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.992348 [log = -2.561632 ]- 97.483826 [log = -2.566398 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 49 with 17 vertices (convex hull=31).
18 of 118 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 9 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:049:  FITNESS:   -75.20
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 240)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 14)
              BEST PATCH #: 282 (out of 466 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 49, we have euler=-121 (156745,464432,307566) : difference with theory (-110) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 50
Computing statistics for defect 50 [ (134,127,69) - 92.114 ]
      -white ( 97.84 , 3.50 ) 
      -gray ( 89.50 , 3.01 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.502113 [log = -2.044926 ]- 97.843300 [log = -2.328001 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 50 with 13 vertices (convex hull=32).
3 of 75 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 11 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 7 edges
PATCH #:050:  FITNESS:   -63.29
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 238)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 282 (out of 464 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 50, we have euler=-120 (156747,464446,307579) : difference with theory (-109) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 51
Computing statistics for defect 51 [ (146,132,70) - 91.720 ]
      -white ( 98.29 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 89.85 , 2.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.852104 [log = -1.947610 ]- 98.286461 [log = -2.020146 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 51 with 13 vertices (convex hull=29).
3 of 75 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:051:  FITNESS:   -60.21
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 90)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 80)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 9 (out of 180 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 51, we have euler=-119 (156749,464460,307592) : difference with theory (-108) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 52
Computing statistics for defect 52 [ (131,98,71) - 94.630 ]
      -white ( 98.87 , 3.08 ) 
      -gray ( 90.21 , 2.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.210899 [log = -1.875862 ]- 98.868584 [log = -2.111152 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 52 with 45 vertices (convex hull=75).
92 of 898 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 11 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 30 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:052:  FITNESS:   -60.61
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 232)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 183 (out of 450 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 52, we have euler=-118 (156765,464534,307651) : difference with theory (-107) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 53
Computing statistics for defect 53 [ (135,106,73) - 96.444 ]
      -white ( 100.31 , 3.00 ) 
      -gray ( 91.05 , 2.74 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.051407 [log = -1.920969 ]- 100.314804 [log = -1.978398 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 53 with 8 vertices (convex hull=14).
3 of 25 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 7 by 5 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 1 edges
PATCH #:053:  FITNESS:   -25.14
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 116)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 8)
              BEST PATCH #: 46 (out of 230 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 53, we have euler=-117 (156766,464541,307658) : difference with theory (-106) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 54
Computing statistics for defect 54 [ (132,81,75) - 93.912 ]
      -white ( 97.65 , 3.45 ) 
      -gray ( 89.58 , 4.17 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.583191 [log = -2.181850 ]- 97.652458 [log = -2.147310 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 54 with 54 vertices (convex hull=71).
164 of 1267 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 37 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
PATCH #:054:  FITNESS:   -67.78
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 233)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 188 (out of 451 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 54, we have euler=-116 (156784,464629,307729) : difference with theory (-105) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 55
Computing statistics for defect 55 [ (181,112,76) - 95.818 ]
      -white ( 98.81 , 3.77 ) 
      -gray ( 91.88 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.881592 [log = -2.006672 ]- 98.813637 [log = -2.520250 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 55 with 35 vertices (convex hull=66).
50 of 545 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
PATCH #:055:  FITNESS:   -68.12
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 123)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 18)
              BEST PATCH #: 59 (out of 245 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 55, we have euler=-115 (156793,464679,307771) : difference with theory (-104) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 56
Computing statistics for defect 56 [ (146,150,75) - 98.095 ]
      -white ( 100.12 , 2.65 ) 
      -gray ( 92.15 , 2.64 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (92.146667 [log = -1.890861 ]- 100.121117 [log = -1.912854 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 56 with 14 vertices (convex hull=30).
2 of 89 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
PATCH #:056:  FITNESS:   -58.02
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 271)
              CROSSOVERS: 8 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 347 (out of 529 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 56, we have euler=-114 (156796,464696,307786) : difference with theory (-103) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 57
Computing statistics for defect 57 [ (148,87,77) - 94.931 ]
      -white ( 100.35 , 3.39 ) 
      -gray ( 90.69 , 4.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.685577 [log = -2.211201 ]- 100.347618 [log = -2.096991 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 57 with 44 vertices (convex hull=77).
61 of 885 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 43 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
PATCH #:057:  FITNESS:   -66.70
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 257)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 319 (out of 499 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 57, we have euler=-113 (156805,464753,307835) : difference with theory (-102) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 58
Computing statistics for defect 58 [ (188,129,79) - 92.257 ]
      -white ( 97.24 , 3.74 ) 
      -gray ( 88.28 , 8.41 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.280884 [log = -3.059751 ]- 97.236221 [log = -2.196011 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 58 with 69 vertices (convex hull=87).
79 of 2267 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 20 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 100 edges
PATCH #:058:  FITNESS:   -69.15
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 207)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 73)
              BEST PATCH #: 134 (out of 401 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 58, we have euler=-112 (156831,464871,307928) : difference with theory (-101) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 59
Computing statistics for defect 59 [ (143,133,79) - 94.200 ]
      -white ( 96.09 , 2.66 ) 
      -gray ( 88.63 , 2.71 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.627602 [log = -1.932490 ]- 96.094955 [log = -1.876709 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 59 with 27 vertices (convex hull=40).
3 of 348 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 10 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
PATCH #:059:  FITNESS:   -59.88
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 140)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 29)
              BEST PATCH #: 96 (out of 278 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 59, we have euler=-111 (156839,464911,307961) : difference with theory (-100) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 60
Computing statistics for defect 60 [ (140,143,80) - 92.589 ]
      -white ( 98.13 , 2.65 ) 
      -gray ( 88.97 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.972504 [log = -2.063527 ]- 98.129936 [log = -1.892421 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 60 with 13 vertices (convex hull=28).
0 of 78 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 10 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
PATCH #:060:  FITNESS:   -60.38
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 116)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 18)
              BEST PATCH #: 52 (out of 230 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 60, we have euler=-110 (156843,464929,307976) : difference with theory (-99) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 61
Computing statistics for defect 61 [ (187,110,81) - 93.691 ]
      -white ( 97.54 , 3.58 ) 
      -gray ( 91.89 , 3.81 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.888252 [log = -1.927751 ]- 97.535141 [log = -2.279159 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 61 with 23 vertices (convex hull=37).
3 of 250 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 9 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:061:  FITNESS:   -69.06
              MUTATIONS: 10 (out of 357)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 320)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 20)
              BEST PATCH #: 501 (out of 687 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 61, we have euler=-109 (156846,464955,308000) : difference with theory (-98) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 62
Computing statistics for defect 62 [ (161,148,81) - 96.961 ]
      -white ( 99.36 , 2.99 ) 
      -gray ( 99.60 , 38.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (99.600990 [log = -4.565873 ]- 99.357140 [log = -2.033678 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 62 with 8 vertices (convex hull=13).
0 of 28 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 7 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 2 edges
PATCH #:062:  FITNESS:   -97.70
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 207)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 221 (out of 401 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 62, we have euler=-108 (156847,464962,308007) : difference with theory (-97) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 63
Computing statistics for defect 63 [ (182,108,83) - 96.862 ]
      -white ( 99.10 , 3.72 ) 
      -gray ( 91.92 , 2.63 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.923149 [log = -1.878942 ]- 99.097725 [log = -2.357251 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 63 with 46 vertices (convex hull=74).
19 of 1016 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 39 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
PATCH #:063:  FITNESS:   -62.21
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 257)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 25)
              BEST PATCH #: 321 (out of 499 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 63, we have euler=-107 (156857,465021,308057) : difference with theory (-96) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 64
Computing statistics for defect 64 [ (188,138,96) - 93.720 ]
      -white ( 99.29 , 4.79 ) 
      -gray ( 84.86 , 11.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (84.859810 [log = -3.421441 ]- 99.287369 [log = -2.682518 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 64 with 695 vertices (convex hull=687).
31484 of 209681 overlapping edges discarded
tessellating patch....
done
After retessellation of defect 64, we have euler=-105 (157194,466396,309097) : difference with theory (-95) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 65
Computing statistics for defect 65 [ (153,85,86) - 93.134 ]
      -white ( 99.13 , 3.26 ) 
      -gray ( 88.99 , 3.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.991196 [log = -2.061676 ]- 99.133362 [log = -2.094995 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 65 with 47 vertices (convex hull=74).
40 of 1041 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 11 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 25 edges
                 cluster 1 has 23 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:065:  FITNESS:   -62.99
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 230)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 38)
              BEST PATCH #: 179 (out of 448 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 65, we have euler=-104 (157209,466470,309157) : difference with theory (-94) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 66
Computing statistics for defect 66 [ (176,96,86) - 93.179 ]
      -white ( 98.13 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 91.06 , 3.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.061272 [log = -2.083418 ]- 98.126068 [log = -2.155531 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 66 with 56 vertices (convex hull=91).
116 of 1424 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 63 edges
PATCH #:066:  FITNESS:   -63.87
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 300)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 315 (out of 582 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 66, we have euler=-103 (157224,466552,309225) : difference with theory (-93) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 67
Computing statistics for defect 67 [ (129,69,130) - 70.642 ]
      -white ( 96.26 , 10.30 ) 
      -gray ( 81.54 , 16.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (81.539330 [log = -3.373839 ]- 96.260353 [log = -2.376683 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 67 with 1236 vertices (convex hull=931).
74393 of 688837 overlapping edges discarded
tessellating patch....
done
After retessellation of defect 67, we have euler=-102 (157941,469248,311205) : difference with theory (-92) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 68
Computing statistics for defect 68 [ (152,145,93) - 93.827 ]
      -white ( 97.72 , 2.99 ) 
      -gray ( 89.24 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.237564 [log = -2.013357 ]- 97.724312 [log = -2.044672 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 68 with 69 vertices (convex hull=95).
150 of 2196 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 17 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 83 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
PATCH #:068:  FITNESS:   -72.57
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 192)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 103)
              BEST PATCH #: 113 (out of 378 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 68, we have euler=-101 (157968,469370,311301) : difference with theory (-91) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 69
Computing statistics for defect 69 [ (153,134,100) - 83.196 ]
      -white ( 92.16 , 9.15 ) 
      -gray ( 82.79 , 8.36 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (82.789917 [log = -3.105719 ]- 92.157547 [log = -3.340536 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 69 with 343 vertices (convex hull=289).
5493 of 53160 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 47 by 32 by 36 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 506 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 14 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 13 edges
PATCH #:069:  FITNESS:   -99.15
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 28)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 21)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 464)
              BEST PATCH #: 0 (out of 54 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 69, we have euler=-101 (158159,470103,311843) : difference with theory (-90) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 70
Computing statistics for defect 70 [ (187,100,95) - 94.043 ]
      -white ( 97.47 , 3.27 ) 
      -gray ( 88.59 , 5.34 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.585396 [log = -2.469803 ]- 97.472206 [log = -2.059964 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 70 with 53 vertices (convex hull=71).
67 of 1311 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 13 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 55 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:070:  FITNESS:   -67.35
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 426)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 384)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  11 (out of 37)
              BEST PATCH #: 636 (out of 820 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 70, we have euler=-100 (158168,470160,311892) : difference with theory (-89) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 71
Computing statistics for defect 71 [ (188,104,94) - 93.138 ]
      -white ( 98.23 , 3.67 ) 
      -gray ( 88.10 , 6.77 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.098953 [log = -2.801802 ]- 98.229950 [log = -2.228315 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 71 with 58 vertices (convex hull=94).
125 of 1528 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 15 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 59 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:071:  FITNESS:   -70.89
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 160)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 46)
              BEST PATCH #: 49 (out of 314 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 71, we have euler=-99 (158190,470259,311970) : difference with theory (-88) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 72
Computing statistics for defect 72 [ (181,115,101) - 94.658 ]
      -white ( 99.69 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 88.19 , 6.81 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.194359 [log = -2.755079 ]- 99.690536 [log = -2.174404 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 72 with 460 vertices (convex hull=509).
15366 of 90204 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 71 by 40 by 36 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 9 segments were found (11 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 441 edges
                 cluster 1 has 92 edges
                 cluster 2 has 46 edges
                 cluster 3 has 35 edges
                 cluster 4 has 11 edges
                 cluster 5 has 11 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
                 cluster 8 has 5 edges
PATCH #:072:  FITNESS:   -71.50
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 34)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 27)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 487)
              BEST PATCH #: 17 (out of 66 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 72, we have euler=-97 (158393,471127,312637) : difference with theory (-87) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 73
Computing statistics for defect 73 [ (183,155,95) - 91.665 ]
      -white ( 97.21 , 2.66 ) 
      -gray ( 88.48 , 3.48 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.479462 [log = -2.122725 ]- 97.210258 [log = -1.890447 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 73 with 55 vertices (convex hull=85).
77 of 1408 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 17 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 70 edges
PATCH #:073:  FITNESS:   -62.31
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 197)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 45)
              BEST PATCH #: 120 (out of 383 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 73, we have euler=-96 (158412,471218,312710) : difference with theory (-86) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 74
Computing statistics for defect 74 [ (188,126,99) - 95.114 ]
      -white ( 99.63 , 3.62 ) 
      -gray ( 86.17 , 10.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.172539 [log = -3.308186 ]- 99.634430 [log = -2.213664 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 74 with 194 vertices (convex hull=243).
973 of 17748 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 35 by 27 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 6 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 190 edges
                 cluster 1 has 22 edges
                 cluster 2 has 22 edges
                 cluster 3 has 19 edges
                 cluster 4 has 9 edges
                 cluster 5 has 9 edges
PATCH #:074:  FITNESS:   -73.81
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 356)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 320)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  35 (out of 174)
              BEST PATCH #: 423 (out of 686 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 74, we have euler=-95 (158454,471463,312914) : difference with theory (-85) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 75
Computing statistics for defect 75 [ (133,100,97) - 94.374 ]
      -white ( 100.10 , 4.07 ) 
      -gray ( 88.62 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.619026 [log = -2.101039 ]- 100.103645 [log = -2.384488 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 75 with 34 vertices (convex hull=58).
32 of 529 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 14 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
PATCH #:075:  FITNESS:   -68.55
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 115)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 23)
              BEST PATCH #: 43 (out of 229 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 75, we have euler=-94 (158463,471512,312955) : difference with theory (-84) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 76
Computing statistics for defect 76 [ (146,134,96) - 93.158 ]
      -white ( 100.24 , 4.08 ) 
      -gray ( 90.02 , 3.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.022240 [log = -2.000563 ]- 100.235710 [log = -2.365664 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 76 with 28 vertices (convex hull=51).
13 of 365 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 16 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:076:  FITNESS:   -64.37
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 121)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 65 (out of 243 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 76, we have euler=-93 (158470,471551,312988) : difference with theory (-83) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 77
Computing statistics for defect 77 [ (179,157,102) - 92.623 ]
      -white ( 97.74 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 88.14 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.139145 [log = -2.041161 ]- 97.738640 [log = -1.975025 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 77 with 101 vertices (convex hull=127).
162 of 4888 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 29 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 82 edges
                 cluster 1 has 34 edges
                 cluster 2 has 16 edges
PATCH #:077:  FITNESS:   -69.28
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 166)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 164)
              BEST PATCH #: 69 (out of 328 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 77, we have euler=-92 (158514,471743,313137) : difference with theory (-82) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 78
Computing statistics for defect 78 [ (144,128,100) - 86.736 ]
      -white ( 98.84 , 32.46 ) 
      -gray ( 84.78 , 6.98 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (84.779800 [log = -2.606284 ]- 98.838638 [log = -2.859130 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 78 with 15 vertices (convex hull=27).
0 of 105 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 7 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 20 edges
PATCH #:078:  FITNESS:   -81.66
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 133)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 25)
              BEST PATCH #: 79 (out of 263 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 78, we have euler=-91 (158520,471767,313156) : difference with theory (-81) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 79
Computing statistics for defect 79 [ (165,139,106) - 84.948 ]
      -white ( 96.13 , 6.70 ) 
      -gray ( 85.73 , 4.66 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (85.734039 [log = -2.406597 ]- 96.133942 [log = -3.145435 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 79 with 56 vertices (convex hull=73).
87 of 1453 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 18 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 67 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
PATCH #:079:  FITNESS:   -85.21
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 231)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 80)
              BEST PATCH #: 192 (out of 449 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 79, we have euler=-90 (158544,471871,313237) : difference with theory (-80) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 80
Computing statistics for defect 80 [ (188,99,103) - 92.891 ]
      -white ( 95.70 , 3.00 ) 
      -gray ( 87.23 , 7.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.225693 [log = -3.142815 ]- 95.701363 [log = -1.970624 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 80 with 36 vertices (convex hull=53).
5 of 625 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 11 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 23 edges
                 cluster 1 has 18 edges
PATCH #:080:  FITNESS:   -75.94
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 305)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 417 (out of 587 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 80, we have euler=-89 (158552,471916,313275) : difference with theory (-79) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 81
Computing statistics for defect 81 [ (169,154,103) - 94.463 ]
      -white ( 98.50 , 2.81 ) 
      -gray ( 89.82 , 2.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.824493 [log = -1.916301 ]- 98.503616 [log = -1.996507 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 81 with 45 vertices (convex hull=64).
51 of 939 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 13 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 37 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 1 edges
PATCH #:081:  FITNESS:   -72.23
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 144)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 45)
              BEST PATCH #: 27 (out of 282 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 81, we have euler=-88 (158564,471982,313330) : difference with theory (-78) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 82
Computing statistics for defect 82 [ (160,91,105) - 93.813 ]
      -white ( 98.24 , 3.22 ) 
      -gray ( 87.63 , 4.16 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.626915 [log = -2.327879 ]- 98.235771 [log = -2.149735 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 82 with 141 vertices (convex hull=182).
704 of 9166 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 17 by 27 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 113 edges
                 cluster 1 has 48 edges
                 cluster 2 has 15 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
PATCH #:082:  FITNESS:   -66.13
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 497)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 448)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  38 (out of 94)
              BEST PATCH #: 688 (out of 955 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 82, we have euler=-87 (158580,472119,313452) : difference with theory (-77) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 83
Computing statistics for defect 83 [ (175,128,103) - 94.742 ]
      -white ( 99.83 , 2.86 ) 
      -gray ( 91.28 , 2.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.276146 [log = -1.926884 ]- 99.832893 [log = -1.945957 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 83 with 12 vertices (convex hull=23).
0 of 66 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 10 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 11 edges
PATCH #:083:  FITNESS:   -57.85
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 277)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 355 (out of 535 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 83, we have euler=-86 (158583,472134,313465) : difference with theory (-76) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 84
Computing statistics for defect 84 [ (171,128,104) - 93.756 ]
      -white ( 99.43 , 2.99 ) 
      -gray ( 91.20 , 2.68 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.195297 [log = -1.918259 ]- 99.429970 [log = -2.028721 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 84 with 12 vertices (convex hull=27).
1 of 65 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 9 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
PATCH #:084:  FITNESS:   -58.88
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 313)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 280)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 421 (out of 603 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 84, we have euler=-85 (158585,472147,313477) : difference with theory (-75) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 85
Computing statistics for defect 85 [ (165,124,108) - 93.741 ]
      -white ( 98.34 , 3.18 ) 
      -gray ( 89.68 , 3.77 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.683769 [log = -2.166180 ]- 98.337723 [log = -2.126735 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 85 with 26 vertices (convex hull=44).
29 of 296 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 10 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
                 cluster 1 has 5 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:085:  FITNESS:   -63.73
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 133)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 14)
              BEST PATCH #: 85 (out of 263 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 85, we have euler=-84 (158590,472182,313508) : difference with theory (-74) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 86
Computing statistics for defect 86 [ (189,124,109) - 93.860 ]
      -white ( 100.13 , 3.47 ) 
      -gray ( 91.12 , 3.17 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.123268 [log = -1.976943 ]- 100.128387 [log = -2.270236 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 86 with 30 vertices (convex hull=46).
80 of 355 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 11 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 7 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:086:  FITNESS:   -63.64
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 221)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 22)
              BEST PATCH #: 251 (out of 431 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 86, we have euler=-82 (158597,472222,313543) : difference with theory (-73) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 87
Computing statistics for defect 87 [ (180,129,118) - 94.387 ]
      -white ( 99.56 , 3.73 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.394493 [log = -1.983711 ]- 99.558159 [log = -2.165996 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 87 with 616 vertices (convex hull=622).
19508 of 169912 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 65 by 52 by 37 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (43 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 41 edges
                 cluster 1 has 33 edges
                 cluster 2 has 33 edges
                 cluster 3 has 31 edges
                 cluster 4 has 29 edges
                 cluster 5 has 28 edges
                 cluster 6 has 27 edges
                 cluster 7 has 26 edges
                 cluster 8 has 21 edges
                 cluster 9 has 21 edges
PATCH #:087:  FITNESS:   -72.45
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 54)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 48)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 1104)
              BEST PATCH #: 2 (out of 112 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 87, we have euler=-81 (158848,473380,314451) : difference with theory (-72) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 88
Computing statistics for defect 88 [ (194,145,108) - 91.187 ]
      -white ( 96.10 , 4.43 ) 
      -gray ( 81.87 , 10.05 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (81.873070 [log = -3.650485 ]- 96.100304 [log = -2.461028 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 88 with 32 vertices (convex hull=65).
33 of 463 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 13 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
PATCH #:088:  FITNESS:   -82.36
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 18)
              BEST PATCH #: 111 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 88, we have euler=-80 (158854,473421,314487) : difference with theory (-71) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 89
Computing statistics for defect 89 [ (192,136,109) - 95.742 ]
      -white ( 99.20 , 3.38 ) 
      -gray ( 91.81 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.808411 [log = -1.954608 ]- 99.200111 [log = -2.213070 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 89 with 14 vertices (convex hull=27).
15 of 76 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 9 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
PATCH #:089:  FITNESS:   -66.99
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 151)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 113 (out of 297 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 89, we have euler=-79 (158855,473435,314501) : difference with theory (-70) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 90
Computing statistics for defect 90 [ (140,77,112) - 92.849 ]
      -white ( 98.19 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 88.33 , 4.95 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.328949 [log = -2.561212 ]- 98.188179 [log = -2.078510 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 90 with 48 vertices (convex hull=80).
77 of 1051 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 14 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 16 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:090:  FITNESS:   -67.55
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 152)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 51)
              BEST PATCH #: 27 (out of 298 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 90, we have euler=-78 (158869,473508,314561) : difference with theory (-69) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 91
Computing statistics for defect 91 [ (167,146,112) - 93.419 ]
      -white ( 96.43 , 6.69 ) 
      -gray ( 87.48 , 3.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.476753 [log = -2.344228 ]- 96.425453 [log = -2.910993 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 91 with 51 vertices (convex hull=71).
48 of 1227 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 55 edges
                 cluster 1 has 20 edges
PATCH #:091:  FITNESS:   -76.50
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 221)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 31)
              BEST PATCH #: 170 (out of 431 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 91, we have euler=-77 (158889,473598,314632) : difference with theory (-68) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 92
Computing statistics for defect 92 [ (168,114,112) - 95.021 ]
      -white ( 100.98 , 3.89 ) 
      -gray ( 91.17 , 2.84 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.168304 [log = -1.968098 ]- 100.981712 [log = -2.344708 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 92 with 34 vertices (convex hull=50).
7 of 554 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 9 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
PATCH #:092:  FITNESS:   -65.57
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 263)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 22)
              BEST PATCH #: 331 (out of 513 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 92, we have euler=-76 (158898,473644,314670) : difference with theory (-67) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 93
Computing statistics for defect 93 [ (193,133,114) - 95.128 ]
      -white ( 99.29 , 3.26 ) 
      -gray ( 83.96 , 10.82 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (83.958534 [log = -4.337268 ]- 99.291405 [log = -2.068286 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 93 with 94 vertices (convex hull=126).
450 of 3921 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 18 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 90 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
                 cluster 2 has 13 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:093:  FITNESS:   -79.76
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 607)
              CROSSOVERS: 14 (out of 552)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  26 (out of 69)
              BEST PATCH #: 985 (out of 1169 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 93, we have euler=-75 (158907,473728,314746) : difference with theory (-66) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 94
Computing statistics for defect 94 [ (155,142,115) - 95.024 ]
      -white ( 97.60 , 4.63 ) 
      -gray ( 83.74 , 6.60 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (83.735542 [log = -2.771133 ]- 97.602837 [log = -2.454983 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 94 with 34 vertices (convex hull=49).
5 of 556 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 15 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 39 edges
PATCH #:094:  FITNESS:   -92.29
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 224)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 51)
              BEST PATCH #: 258 (out of 434 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 94, we have euler=-74 (158915,473774,314785) : difference with theory (-65) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 95
Computing statistics for defect 95 [ (169,99,116) - 93.185 ]
      -white ( 96.72 , 3.40 ) 
      -gray ( 88.14 , 4.26 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.138313 [log = -2.425239 ]- 96.719337 [log = -2.124525 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 95 with 44 vertices (convex hull=64).
119 of 827 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 40 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:095:  FITNESS:   -69.32
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 347)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 312)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  7 (out of 29)
              BEST PATCH #: 483 (out of 669 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 95, we have euler=-73 (158923,473824,314828) : difference with theory (-64) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 96
Computing statistics for defect 96 [ (165,142,115) - 84.821 ]
      -white ( 101.53 , 34.96 ) 
      -gray ( 88.24 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.243980 [log = -1.928946 ]- 101.525635 [log = -4.389680 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 96 with 10 vertices (convex hull=16).
1 of 44 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 8 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
PATCH #:096:  FITNESS:   -97.59
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 215)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 10)
              BEST PATCH #: 247 (out of 417 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 96, we have euler=-72 (158924,473834,314838) : difference with theory (-63) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 97
Computing statistics for defect 97 [ (188,161,118) - 93.613 ]
      -white ( 96.82 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 89.00 , 5.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.000107 [log = -2.534762 ]- 96.821182 [log = -1.995830 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 97 with 25 vertices (convex hull=55).
7 of 293 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 8 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:097:  FITNESS:   -66.03
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 186)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 17)
              BEST PATCH #: 184 (out of 364 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 97, we have euler=-71 (158929,473866,314866) : difference with theory (-62) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 98
Computing statistics for defect 98 [ (191,153,123) - 93.340 ]
      -white ( 98.23 , 3.74 ) 
      -gray ( 85.65 , 9.60 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (85.652618 [log = -3.495674 ]- 98.229523 [log = -2.328085 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 98 with 85 vertices (convex hull=116).
333 of 3237 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 20 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 86 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:098:  FITNESS:   -73.45
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 268)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 66)
              BEST PATCH #: 249 (out of 518 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 98, we have euler=-70 (158958,474003,314975) : difference with theory (-61) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 99
Computing statistics for defect 99 [ (169,89,124) - 93.512 ]
      -white ( 98.05 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 87.56 , 6.58 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.563324 [log = -2.845328 ]- 98.053917 [log = -1.990852 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 99 with 108 vertices (convex hull=155).
678 of 5100 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 17 by 27 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 57 edges
                 cluster 1 has 26 edges
                 cluster 2 has 16 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
PATCH #:099:  FITNESS:   -70.54
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 373)
              CROSSOVERS: 14 (out of 344)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  13 (out of 162)
              BEST PATCH #: 456 (out of 727 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 99, we have euler=-69 (158982,474147,315096) : difference with theory (-60) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 100
Computing statistics for defect 100 [ (132,130,121) - 79.844 ]
      -white ( 90.60 , 5.21 ) 
      -gray ( 82.55 , 33.52 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (82.551346 [log = -3.887275 ]- 90.596191 [log = -2.538334 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 100 with 15 vertices (convex hull=30).
1 of 104 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 12 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
PATCH #:100:  FITNESS:   -90.96
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 161)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 137 (out of 315 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 100, we have euler=-68 (158985,474165,315112) : difference with theory (-59) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 101
Computing statistics for defect 101 [ (131,142,121) - 91.002 ]
      -white ( 94.42 , 11.58 ) 
      -gray ( 88.50 , 31.93 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.502106 [log = -5.187807 ]- 94.421196 [log = -3.579328 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 101 with 28 vertices (convex hull=43).
1 of 377 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 13 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 45 edges
PATCH #:101:  FITNESS:   -114.40
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 310)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 280)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 12)
              BEST PATCH #: 424 (out of 600 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 101, we have euler=-67 (158993,474204,315144) : difference with theory (-58) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 102
Computing statistics for defect 102 [ (143,152,125) - 91.364 ]
      -white ( 99.13 , 9.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.03 , 17.26 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.028481 [log = -5.844378 ]- 99.127388 [log = -3.112480 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 102 with 75 vertices (convex hull=90).
115 of 2660 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 21 by 18 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 75 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
PATCH #:102:  FITNESS:   -112.25
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 152)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 111)
              BEST PATCH #: 29 (out of 298 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 102, we have euler=-66 (159018,474330,315246) : difference with theory (-57) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 103
Computing statistics for defect 103 [ (152,151,131) - 91.315 ]
      -white ( 94.89 , 8.11 ) 
      -gray ( 84.68 , 9.73 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (84.681847 [log = -3.139740 ]- 94.893646 [log = -3.069777 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 103 with 501 vertices (convex hull=573).
15729 of 109521 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 56 by 39 by 52 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 541 edges
                 cluster 1 has 59 edges
                 cluster 2 has 41 edges
                 cluster 3 has 23 edges
                 cluster 4 has 16 edges
                 cluster 5 has 15 edges
                 cluster 6 has 15 edges
                 cluster 7 has 13 edges
                 cluster 8 has 11 edges
                 cluster 9 has 11 edges
PATCH #:103:  FITNESS:   -91.79
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 98)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 88)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  78 (out of 784)
              BEST PATCH #: 80 (out of 196 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 103, we have euler=-61 (159158,475035,315816) : difference with theory (-56) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 104
Computing statistics for defect 104 [ (165,130,125) - 93.633 ]
      -white ( 96.78 , 3.18 ) 
      -gray ( 91.24 , 2.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.239037 [log = -1.892850 ]- 96.780602 [log = -2.068677 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 104 with 45 vertices (convex hull=69).
121 of 869 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 38 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:104:  FITNESS:   -64.50
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 223)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 33)
              BEST PATCH #: 251 (out of 433 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 104, we have euler=-60 (159170,475101,315871) : difference with theory (-55) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 105
Computing statistics for defect 105 [ (169,158,126) - 92.794 ]
      -white ( 97.35 , 4.24 ) 
      -gray ( 88.04 , 4.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.043610 [log = -2.126311 ]- 97.348030 [log = -2.578103 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 105 with 87 vertices (convex hull=117).
397 of 3344 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 15 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 60 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:105:  FITNESS:   -69.68
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 206)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 98)
              BEST PATCH #: 129 (out of 400 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 105, we have euler=-59 (159202,475250,315989) : difference with theory (-54) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 106
Computing statistics for defect 106 [ (165,87,129) - 93.547 ]
      -white ( 97.60 , 2.98 ) 
      -gray ( 86.96 , 5.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.962486 [log = -2.766728 ]- 97.602249 [log = -1.985767 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 106 with 130 vertices (convex hull=177).
902 of 7483 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 28 by 21 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 110 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:106:  FITNESS:   -68.82
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 267)
              CROSSOVERS: 12 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 178)
              BEST PATCH #: 268 (out of 525 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 106, we have euler=-58 (159245,475465,316162) : difference with theory (-53) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 107
Computing statistics for defect 107 [ (177,137,127) - 94.094 ]
      -white ( 100.73 , 2.73 ) 
      -gray ( 90.44 , 2.49 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.435776 [log = -1.821650 ]- 100.732117 [log = -1.918795 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 107 with 10 vertices (convex hull=30).
0 of 45 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:107:  FITNESS:   -55.07
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 225)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 255 (out of 435 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 107, we have euler=-57 (159247,475476,316172) : difference with theory (-52) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 108
Computing statistics for defect 108 [ (176,132,128) - 96.968 ]
      -white ( 100.15 , 2.86 ) 
      -gray ( 90.26 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.262039 [log = -2.014295 ]- 100.148026 [log = -1.972100 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 108 with 14 vertices (convex hull=28).
0 of 91 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 8 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:108:  FITNESS:   -58.80
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 289)
              CROSSOVERS: 8 (out of 264)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 377 (out of 563 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 108, we have euler=-56 (159250,475494,316188) : difference with theory (-51) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 109
Computing statistics for defect 109 [ (185,162,130) - 92.964 ]
      -white ( 97.25 , 4.31 ) 
      -gray ( 85.97 , 9.37 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (85.966759 [log = -3.295370 ]- 97.247093 [log = -2.499533 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 109 with 138 vertices (convex hull=169).
649 of 8804 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 29 by 17 by 24 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 71 edges
                 cluster 1 has 44 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
                 cluster 4 has 8 edges
PATCH #:109:  FITNESS:   -76.14
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 234)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 187)
              BEST PATCH #: 181 (out of 452 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 109, we have euler=-56 (159303,475741,316382) : difference with theory (-50) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 110
Computing statistics for defect 110 [ (167,151,148) - 94.096 ]
      -white ( 98.76 , 3.81 ) 
      -gray ( 90.23 , 3.29 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.227509 [log = -2.112637 ]- 98.764458 [log = -2.259759 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 110 with 377 vertices (convex hull=409).
3493 of 67383 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 34 by 65 by 46 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 8 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 365 edges
                 cluster 1 has 94 edges
                 cluster 2 has 48 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 13 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
                 cluster 7 has 6 edges
PATCH #:110:  FITNESS:   -67.03
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 28)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 21)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 560)
              BEST PATCH #: 0 (out of 54 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 110, we have euler=-54 (159478,476466,316934) : difference with theory (-49) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 111
Computing statistics for defect 111 [ (151,159,135) - 83.359 ]
      -white ( 83.02 , 6.32 ) 
      -gray ( 80.31 , 5.99 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (80.314499 [log = -2.467515 ]- 83.015640 [log = -2.539868 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 111 with 52 vertices (convex hull=72).
82 of 1244 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:111:  FITNESS:   -83.59
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 257)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 81)
              BEST PATCH #: 232 (out of 499 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 111, we have euler=-53 (159495,476549,317001) : difference with theory (-48) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 112
Computing statistics for defect 112 [ (184,142,136) - 94.083 ]
      -white ( 99.61 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 90.48 , 2.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.482826 [log = -1.924711 ]- 99.612167 [log = -2.089574 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 112 with 81 vertices (convex hull=112).
216 of 3024 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 23 by 21 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 58 edges
                 cluster 1 has 46 edges
PATCH #:112:  FITNESS:   -63.06
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 221)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 68)
              BEST PATCH #: 168 (out of 431 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 112, we have euler=-51 (159521,476681,317109) : difference with theory (-47) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 113
Computing statistics for defect 113 [ (180,136,142) - 91.867 ]
      -white ( 97.54 , 3.38 ) 
      -gray ( 89.19 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.190239 [log = -2.048554 ]- 97.535011 [log = -2.185277 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 113 with 142 vertices (convex hull=164).
557 of 9454 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 28 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 139 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:113:  FITNESS:   -71.36
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 215)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 210)
              BEST PATCH #: 150 (out of 417 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 113, we have euler=-50 (159581,476943,317312) : difference with theory (-46) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 114
Computing statistics for defect 114 [ (189,113,140) - 94.118 ]
      -white ( 97.02 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 91.04 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.035728 [log = -2.013400 ]- 97.016190 [log = -1.940940 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 114 with 62 vertices (convex hull=86).
106 of 1785 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 16 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 33 edges
                 cluster 1 has 28 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:114:  FITNESS:   -62.23
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 161)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 55)
              BEST PATCH #: 52 (out of 315 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 114, we have euler=-49 (159604,477051,317398) : difference with theory (-45) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 115
Computing statistics for defect 115 [ (182,131,137) - 87.841 ]
      -white ( 94.72 , 3.40 ) 
      -gray ( 89.26 , 2.56 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.261673 [log = -1.876828 ]- 94.715324 [log = -2.059794 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 115 with 20 vertices (convex hull=37).
2 of 188 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 11 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 14 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:115:  FITNESS:   -61.87
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 321)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 447 (out of 619 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 115, we have euler=-48 (159608,477076,317420) : difference with theory (-44) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 116
Computing statistics for defect 116 [ (137,149,147) - 88.254 ]
      -white ( 88.36 , 9.04 ) 
      -gray ( 75.92 , 12.78 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (75.915413 [log = -3.865307 ]- 88.356255 [log = -3.248414 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 116 with 281 vertices (convex hull=246).
3178 of 36162 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 51 by 28 by 30 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 393 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 16 edges
                 cluster 3 has 8 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
PATCH #:116:  FITNESS:   -110.24
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 1377)
              BEST PATCH #: 24 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 116, we have euler=-47 (159752,477662,317863) : difference with theory (-43) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 117
Computing statistics for defect 117 [ (178,98,140) - 94.358 ]
      -white ( 98.04 , 3.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.56 , 3.88 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.555862 [log = -2.051390 ]- 98.038475 [log = -2.121875 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 117 with 63 vertices (convex hull=86).
126 of 1827 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 13 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 77 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:117:  FITNESS:   -67.14
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 170)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 73)
              BEST PATCH #: 67 (out of 332 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 117, we have euler=-46 (159776,477772,317950) : difference with theory (-42) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 118
Computing statistics for defect 118 [ (139,138,139) - 92.310 ]
      -white ( 89.87 , 6.85 ) 
      -gray ( 89.86 , 37.85 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.860756 [log = -3.250060 ]- 89.873138 [log = -3.162390 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 118 with 8 vertices (convex hull=11).
1 of 27 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 5 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
PATCH #:118:  FITNESS:   -31.88
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 234)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 23)
              BEST PATCH #: 276 (out of 452 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 118, we have euler=-45 (159779,477783,317959) : difference with theory (-41) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 119
Computing statistics for defect 119 [ (131,77,140) - 94.470 ]
      -white ( 97.20 , 3.45 ) 
      -gray ( 89.51 , 3.95 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.508179 [log = -2.434213 ]- 97.197922 [log = -2.143129 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 119 with 31 vertices (convex hull=55).
33 of 432 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 29 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:119:  FITNESS:   -67.00
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 285)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 375 (out of 551 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 119, we have euler=-44 (159788,477829,317997) : difference with theory (-40) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 120
Computing statistics for defect 120 [ (163,129,142) - 94.935 ]
      -white ( 97.07 , 2.68 ) 
      -gray ( 91.39 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.389809 [log = -2.020216 ]- 97.066086 [log = -1.899278 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 120 with 30 vertices (convex hull=46).
29 of 406 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
PATCH #:120:  FITNESS:   -64.18
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 362)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 530 (out of 700 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 120, we have euler=-43 (159797,477873,318033) : difference with theory (-39) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 121
Computing statistics for defect 121 [ (154,81,145) - 94.868 ]
      -white ( 98.51 , 3.31 ) 
      -gray ( 88.25 , 6.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.245964 [log = -2.842664 ]- 98.508636 [log = -2.142992 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 121 with 140 vertices (convex hull=179).
546 of 9184 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 21 by 18 by 27 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 164 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:121:  FITNESS:   -68.81
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 115)
              BEST PATCH #: 0 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 121, we have euler=-42 (159850,478118,318226) : difference with theory (-38) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 122
Computing statistics for defect 122 [ (142,75,144) - 92.376 ]
      -white ( 98.67 , 3.52 ) 
      -gray ( 82.69 , 10.19 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (82.693031 [log = -3.474906 ]- 98.666382 [log = -2.123778 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 122 with 56 vertices (convex hull=83).
63 of 1477 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 43 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:122:  FITNESS:   -83.74
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 212)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 56)
              BEST PATCH #: 145 (out of 414 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 122, we have euler=-41 (159869,478210,318300) : difference with theory (-37) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 123
Computing statistics for defect 123 [ (132,127,144) - 77.968 ]
      -white ( 79.12 , 31.15 ) 
      -gray ( 78.04 , 11.19 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (78.044342 [log = -3.494375 ]- 79.120026 [log = -3.100426 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 123 with 27 vertices (convex hull=36).
11 of 340 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 44 edges
PATCH #:123:  FITNESS:   -100.23
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 153)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 12)
              BEST PATCH #: 113 (out of 299 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 123, we have euler=-40 (159880,478257,318337) : difference with theory (-36) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 124
Computing statistics for defect 124 [ (177,95,146) - 94.163 ]
      -white ( 98.03 , 3.01 ) 
      -gray ( 91.58 , 2.61 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.576775 [log = -1.883362 ]- 98.025520 [log = -2.042756 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 124 with 62 vertices (convex hull=96).
229 of 1662 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 13 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 40 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:124:  FITNESS:   -63.01
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 348)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 312)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  9 (out of 78)
              BEST PATCH #: 488 (out of 670 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 124, we have euler=-39 (159891,478330,318400) : difference with theory (-35) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 125
Computing statistics for defect 125 [ (176,126,147) - 93.450 ]
      -white ( 97.56 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 89.89 , 2.75 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.893120 [log = -1.948609 ]- 97.557152 [log = -1.956198 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 125 with 93 vertices (convex hull=117).
247 of 4031 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 18 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 73 edges
                 cluster 1 has 39 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:125:  FITNESS:   -65.52
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 278)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 110)
              BEST PATCH #: 279 (out of 536 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 125, we have euler=-38 (159923,478481,318520) : difference with theory (-34) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 126
Computing statistics for defect 126 [ (178,143,150) - 89.974 ]
      -white ( 95.39 , 3.77 ) 
      -gray ( 86.93 , 3.37 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.932365 [log = -2.140144 ]- 95.390518 [log = -2.263253 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 126 with 23 vertices (convex hull=40).
9 of 244 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 11 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
PATCH #:126:  FITNESS:   -67.46
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 185)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 29)
              BEST PATCH #: 183 (out of 363 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 126, we have euler=-37 (159929,478514,318548) : difference with theory (-33) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 127
Computing statistics for defect 127 [ (156,147,151) - 91.471 ]
      -white ( 94.53 , 2.74 ) 
      -gray ( 96.37 , 42.12 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (96.373230 [log = -6.502296 ]- 94.525642 [log = -1.882346 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 127 with 6 vertices (convex hull=12).
0 of 15 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 7 by 6 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:127:  FITNESS:   -112.19
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 126)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 78 (out of 248 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 127, we have euler=-36 (159929,478517,318552) : difference with theory (-32) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 128
Computing statistics for defect 128 [ (141,145,158) - 94.270 ]
      -white ( 98.48 , 3.61 ) 
      -gray ( 88.05 , 3.09 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.049942 [log = -2.011730 ]- 98.478058 [log = -2.184503 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 128 with 143 vertices (convex hull=153).
570 of 9583 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 28 by 25 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 188 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
PATCH #:128:  FITNESS:   -70.47
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 184)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 237)
              BEST PATCH #: 107 (out of 362 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 128, we have euler=-35 (159996,478791,318760) : difference with theory (-31) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 129
Computing statistics for defect 129 [ (169,89,155) - 94.102 ]
      -white ( 96.11 , 2.73 ) 
      -gray ( 86.38 , 7.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.383484 [log = -3.171805 ]- 96.112251 [log = -1.899493 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 129 with 69 vertices (convex hull=76).
185 of 2161 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 50 edges
                 cluster 1 has 50 edges
PATCH #:129:  FITNESS:   -71.92
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 409)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 368)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  11 (out of 49)
              BEST PATCH #: 518 (out of 787 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 129, we have euler=-34 (160013,478884,318837) : difference with theory (-30) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 130
Computing statistics for defect 130 [ (158,150,154) - 96.829 ]
      -white ( 96.00 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 86.37 , 3.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.366638 [log = -2.283168 ]- 96.000488 [log = -1.973828 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 130 with 17 vertices (convex hull=34).
6 of 130 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:130:  FITNESS:   -66.35
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 90)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 80)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 4 (out of 180 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 130, we have euler=-33 (160015,478903,318855) : difference with theory (-29) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 131
Computing statistics for defect 131 [ (173,159,154) - 95.241 ]
      -white ( 99.81 , 4.00 ) 
      -gray ( 91.55 , 2.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.549362 [log = -1.849675 ]- 99.809021 [log = -2.424871 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 131 with 33 vertices (convex hull=46).
1 of 527 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 10 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 33 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
PATCH #:131:  FITNESS:   -65.26
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 187)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 42)
              BEST PATCH #: 185 (out of 365 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 131, we have euler=-32 (160026,478955,318897) : difference with theory (-28) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 132
Computing statistics for defect 132 [ (167,142,157) - 93.697 ]
      -white ( 98.59 , 3.28 ) 
      -gray ( 88.69 , 3.14 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.687744 [log = -2.065041 ]- 98.594055 [log = -2.157642 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 132 with 67 vertices (convex hull=104).
173 of 2038 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 14 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 63 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:132:  FITNESS:   -65.67
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 250)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 81)
              BEST PATCH #: 213 (out of 484 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 132, we have euler=-31 (160050,479070,318989) : difference with theory (-27) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 133
Computing statistics for defect 133 [ (160,84,158) - 93.860 ]
      -white ( 96.65 , 2.83 ) 
      -gray ( 83.71 , 12.14 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (83.713806 [log = -4.250199 ]- 96.652748 [log = -1.949839 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 133 with 53 vertices (convex hull=69).
35 of 1343 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 45 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:133:  FITNESS:   -75.35
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 380)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 344)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 48)
              BEST PATCH #: 479 (out of 734 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 133, we have euler=-30 (160065,479144,319049) : difference with theory (-26) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 134
Computing statistics for defect 134 [ (176,134,157) - 94.750 ]
      -white ( 99.29 , 2.99 ) 
      -gray ( 90.16 , 2.69 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.160217 [log = -1.898655 ]- 99.292519 [log = -1.950529 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 134 with 38 vertices (convex hull=63).
60 of 643 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 19 edges
                 cluster 1 has 18 edges
PATCH #:134:  FITNESS:   -64.08
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 275)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 35)
              BEST PATCH #: 353 (out of 533 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 134, we have euler=-29 (160075,479199,319095) : difference with theory (-25) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 135
Computing statistics for defect 135 [ (165,97,165) - 94.303 ]
      -white ( 98.85 , 3.64 ) 
      -gray ( 90.14 , 4.66 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.141068 [log = -2.276824 ]- 98.845306 [log = -2.273245 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 135 with 183 vertices (convex hull=214).
1948 of 14705 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 24 by 27 by 26 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 224 edges
                 cluster 1 has 24 edges
                 cluster 2 has 21 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
                 cluster 4 has 9 edges
PATCH #:135:  FITNESS:   -65.89
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 147)
              BEST PATCH #: 2 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 135, we have euler=-28 (160156,479543,319359) : difference with theory (-24) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 136
Computing statistics for defect 136 [ (171,94,162) - 93.914 ]
      -white ( 97.30 , 3.51 ) 
      -gray ( 89.75 , 5.18 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.754364 [log = -2.204692 ]- 97.300652 [log = -2.102188 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 136 with 45 vertices (convex hull=74).
33 of 957 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 15 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 39 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
PATCH #:136:  FITNESS:   -69.00
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 35)
              BEST PATCH #: 10 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 136, we have euler=-27 (160171,479615,319417) : difference with theory (-23) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 137
Computing statistics for defect 137 [ (146,85,164) - 95.968 ]
      -white ( 97.25 , 3.52 ) 
      -gray ( 86.96 , 7.40 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.960358 [log = -3.229482 ]- 97.247414 [log = -2.118572 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 137 with 23 vertices (convex hull=41).
27 of 226 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 9 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
PATCH #:137:  FITNESS:   -79.56
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 221)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 67)
              BEST PATCH #: 251 (out of 431 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 137, we have euler=-26 (160175,479643,319442) : difference with theory (-22) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 138
Computing statistics for defect 138 [ (148,145,165) - 93.798 ]
      -white ( 97.58 , 3.18 ) 
      -gray ( 89.00 , 2.93 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.996925 [log = -1.996425 ]- 97.582756 [log = -2.054105 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 138 with 55 vertices (convex hull=80).
26 of 1459 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 15 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 72 edges
PATCH #:138:  FITNESS:   -61.85
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 366)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  12 (out of 38)
              BEST PATCH #: 520 (out of 704 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 138, we have euler=-25 (160185,479703,319493) : difference with theory (-21) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 139
Computing statistics for defect 139 [ (162,140,171) - 92.924 ]
      -white ( 97.83 , 3.73 ) 
      -gray ( 87.98 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.976250 [log = -2.013158 ]- 97.832428 [log = -2.340452 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 139 with 16 vertices (convex hull=34).
3 of 117 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 9 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
PATCH #:139:  FITNESS:   -66.14
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 290)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 264)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 34)
              BEST PATCH #: 380 (out of 564 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 139, we have euler=-24 (160187,479720,319509) : difference with theory (-20) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 140
Computing statistics for defect 140 [ (133,96,172) - 95.087 ]
      -white ( 100.16 , 3.46 ) 
      -gray ( 91.43 , 3.43 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (91.427048 [log = -2.173246 ]- 100.156425 [log = -2.117191 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 140 with 13 vertices (convex hull=21).
12 of 66 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 6 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:140:  FITNESS:   -70.08
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 107)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 96)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 13)
              BEST PATCH #: 37 (out of 213 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 140, we have euler=-23 (160189,479735,319523) : difference with theory (-19) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 141
Computing statistics for defect 141 [ (177,123,172) - 95.258 ]
      -white ( 98.05 , 3.41 ) 
      -gray ( 90.15 , 4.41 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.151878 [log = -2.177880 ]- 98.051659 [log = -2.126399 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 141 with 51 vertices (convex hull=80).
83 of 1192 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:141:  FITNESS:   -62.73
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 345)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 312)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 42)
              BEST PATCH #: 493 (out of 667 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 141, we have euler=-22 (160198,479796,319576) : difference with theory (-18) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 142
Computing statistics for defect 142 [ (166,139,177) - 90.499 ]
      -white ( 95.88 , 4.32 ) 
      -gray ( 87.42 , 3.57 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.423676 [log = -2.120055 ]- 95.877014 [log = -2.399665 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 142 with 16 vertices (convex hull=36).
3 of 117 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
PATCH #:142:  FITNESS:   -71.08
              MUTATIONS: 8 (out of 212)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 10)
              BEST PATCH #: 232 (out of 414 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 142, we have euler=-21 (160200,479813,319592) : difference with theory (-17) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 143
Computing statistics for defect 143 [ (157,95,180) - 93.978 ]
      -white ( 97.14 , 2.91 ) 
      -gray ( 90.64 , 3.80 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.640396 [log = -2.087589 ]- 97.138191 [log = -2.011489 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 143 with 63 vertices (convex hull=83).
220 of 1733 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 15 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 53 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:143:  FITNESS:   -70.25
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 527)
              CROSSOVERS: 13 (out of 480)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  12 (out of 76)
              BEST PATCH #: 833 (out of 1017 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 143, we have euler=-20 (160209,479882,319653) : difference with theory (-16) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 144
Computing statistics for defect 144 [ (174,137,180) - 94.092 ]
      -white ( 98.25 , 3.33 ) 
      -gray ( 89.77 , 3.41 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.765961 [log = -2.000336 ]- 98.247505 [log = -2.131957 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 144 with 36 vertices (convex hull=65).
19 of 611 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 13 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:144:  FITNESS:   -63.23
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 176)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 162 (out of 346 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 144, we have euler=-19 (160217,479931,319695) : difference with theory (-15) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 145
Computing statistics for defect 145 [ (138,91,182) - 92.936 ]
      -white ( 96.86 , 5.45 ) 
      -gray ( 87.43 , 8.33 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.434303 [log = -3.359928 ]- 96.857437 [log = -2.380544 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 145 with 58 vertices (convex hull=87).
46 of 1607 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 79 edges
PATCH #:145:  FITNESS:   -76.59
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 213)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 48)
              BEST PATCH #: 146 (out of 415 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 145, we have euler=-18 (160239,480030,319773) : difference with theory (-14) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 146
Computing statistics for defect 146 [ (170,115,182) - 94.345 ]
      -white ( 97.89 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 91.00 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.996056 [log = -1.909439 ]- 97.890083 [log = -2.065766 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 146 with 35 vertices (convex hull=47).
12 of 583 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 11 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 43 edges
PATCH #:146:  FITNESS:   -66.20
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 186)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 34)
              BEST PATCH #: 103 (out of 364 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 146, we have euler=-17 (160253,480090,319820) : difference with theory (-13) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 147
Computing statistics for defect 147 [ (171,129,183) - 95.133 ]
      -white ( 100.12 , 3.37 ) 
      -gray ( 89.46 , 2.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.461189 [log = -1.951264 ]- 100.116905 [log = -2.207433 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 147 with 63 vertices (convex hull=91).
117 of 1836 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 16 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 46 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:147:  FITNESS:   -62.76
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 387)
              CROSSOVERS: 9 (out of 352)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  7 (out of 53)
              BEST PATCH #: 567 (out of 749 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 147, we have euler=-16 (160265,480167,319886) : difference with theory (-12) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 148
Computing statistics for defect 148 [ (157,102,186) - 94.220 ]
      -white ( 98.63 , 3.92 ) 
      -gray ( 89.51 , 5.46 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.512421 [log = -2.257641 ]- 98.628731 [log = -2.309728 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 148 with 87 vertices (convex hull=112).
410 of 3331 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 24 by 20 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 108 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:148:  FITNESS:   -69.98
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 176)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 105)
              BEST PATCH #: 77 (out of 346 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 148, we have euler=-15 (160300,480322,320007) : difference with theory (-11) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 149
Computing statistics for defect 149 [ (162,111,186) - 94.363 ]
      -white ( 98.10 , 3.31 ) 
      -gray ( 89.65 , 3.65 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.654640 [log = -1.972375 ]- 98.102562 [log = -2.179351 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 149 with 138 vertices (convex hull=180).
1596 of 7857 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 20 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 79 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 18 edges
                 cluster 3 has 12 edges
                 cluster 4 has 11 edges
PATCH #:149:  FITNESS:   -63.93
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 255)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 104)
              BEST PATCH #: 240 (out of 497 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 149, we have euler=-12 (160339,480530,320179) : difference with theory (-10) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 150
Computing statistics for defect 150 [ (147,101,185) - 94.135 ]
      -white ( 98.48 , 3.48 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 4.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.390068 [log = -2.277263 ]- 98.478699 [log = -2.049359 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 150 with 45 vertices (convex hull=76).
46 of 944 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 36 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:150:  FITNESS:   -64.64
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 260)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 63)
              BEST PATCH #: 320 (out of 502 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 150, we have euler=-11 (160351,480594,320232) : difference with theory (-9) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 151
Computing statistics for defect 151 [ (159,132,186) - 94.116 ]
      -white ( 99.58 , 3.92 ) 
      -gray ( 87.97 , 3.27 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.965271 [log = -2.033502 ]- 99.578735 [log = -2.372543 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 151 with 51 vertices (convex hull=74).
39 of 1236 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 69 edges
PATCH #:151:  FITNESS:   -66.08
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 220)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 167 (out of 430 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 151, we have euler=-10 (160369,480678,320299) : difference with theory (-8) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 152
Computing statistics for defect 152 [ (162,137,192) - 88.339 ]
      -white ( 97.17 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 87.20 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (87.204597 [log = -2.106025 ]- 97.172188 [log = -1.997266 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 152 with 32 vertices (convex hull=50).
0 of 496 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 20 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 35 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:152:  FITNESS:   -69.82
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 133)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 273)
              BEST PATCH #: 85 (out of 263 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 152, we have euler=-9 (160379,480727,320339) : difference with theory (-7) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 153
Computing statistics for defect 153 [ (132,92,189) - 89.621 ]
      -white ( 88.47 , 7.30 ) 
      -gray ( 64.92 , 18.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (64.918343 [log = -4.653613 ]- 88.469269 [log = -2.832867 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 153 with 53 vertices (convex hull=97).
46 of 1332 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 22 by 19 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 18 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:153:  FITNESS:   -115.98
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 123)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 115)
              BEST PATCH #: 71 (out of 245 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 153, we have euler=-8 (160391,480801,320402) : difference with theory (-6) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 154
Computing statistics for defect 154 [ (167,125,188) - 95.539 ]
      -white ( 99.52 , 3.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.16 , 2.49 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.157043 [log = -1.849865 ]- 99.519554 [log = -2.221952 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 154 with 45 vertices (convex hull=70).
38 of 952 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 56 edges
PATCH #:154:  FITNESS:   -61.86
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 242)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 35)
              BEST PATCH #: 203 (out of 468 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 154, we have euler=-7 (160405,480868,320456) : difference with theory (-5) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 155
Computing statistics for defect 155 [ (150,110,192) - 93.991 ]
      -white ( 98.89 , 3.72 ) 
      -gray ( 90.13 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.126961 [log = -2.153436 ]- 98.890053 [log = -2.283655 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 155 with 73 vertices (convex hull=107).
88 of 2540 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 20 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 68 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:155:  FITNESS:   -65.54
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 243)
              CROSSOVERS: 9 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 68)
              BEST PATCH #: 216 (out of 477 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 155, we have euler=-6 (160429,480987,320552) : difference with theory (-4) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 156
Computing statistics for defect 156 [ (154,116,193) - 93.867 ]
      -white ( 97.27 , 3.27 ) 
      -gray ( 88.77 , 2.81 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (88.768127 [log = -1.973518 ]- 97.267876 [log = -2.168442 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 156 with 48 vertices (convex hull=71).
28 of 1100 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 31 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:156:  FITNESS:   -62.06
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 167)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 60 (out of 329 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 156, we have euler=-5 (160444,481064,320615) : difference with theory (-3) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 157
Computing statistics for defect 157 [ (157,130,196) - 91.340 ]
      -white ( 99.51 , 3.93 ) 
      -gray ( 90.07 , 3.34 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.065025 [log = -2.117994 ]- 99.512794 [log = -2.294246 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 157 with 163 vertices (convex hull=194).
2168 of 11035 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 32 by 21 by 30 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 159 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
                 cluster 3 has 7 edges
PATCH #:157:  FITNESS:   -68.88
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 162)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 508)
              BEST PATCH #: 51 (out of 316 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 157, we have euler=-4 (160509,481360,320847) : difference with theory (-2) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 158
Computing statistics for defect 158 [ (145,142,192) - 86.895 ]
      -white ( 94.12 , 4.43 ) 
      -gray ( 86.33 , 6.75 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (86.332069 [log = -2.751476 ]- 94.115395 [log = -2.343525 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 158 with 9 vertices (convex hull=22).
1 of 35 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 8 by 8 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:158:  FITNESS:   -77.02
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 153)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 125 (out of 299 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 158, we have euler=-3 (160509,481366,320854) : difference with theory (-1) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 159
Computing statistics for defect 159 [ (150,118,196) - 93.687 ]
      -white ( 99.46 , 3.26 ) 
      -gray ( 90.23 , 2.77 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.225685 [log = -1.983666 ]- 99.457001 [log = -2.077676 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 159 with 29 vertices (convex hull=59).
10 of 396 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 24 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:159:  FITNESS:   -64.71
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 148)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 22)
              BEST PATCH #: 118 (out of 294 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 159, we have euler=-2 (160516,481406,320888) : difference with theory (0) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 160
Computing statistics for defect 160 [ (139,126,198) - 95.265 ]
      -white ( 99.09 , 3.32 ) 
      -gray ( 89.69 , 4.93 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (89.692429 [log = -2.206828 ]- 99.089973 [log = -2.111245 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 160 with 159 vertices (convex hull=222).
1226 of 11335 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 21 by 29 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 6 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 79 edges
                 cluster 1 has 37 edges
                 cluster 2 has 27 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
                 cluster 5 has 6 edges
PATCH #:160:  FITNESS:   -64.69
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 260)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 120)
              BEST PATCH #: 231 (out of 502 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 160, we have euler=0 (160565,481654,321089) : difference with theory (1) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 161
Computing statistics for defect 161 [ (140,117,200) - 93.359 ]
      -white ( 98.73 , 2.97 ) 
      -gray ( 90.96 , 2.57 ) 
      -gray ( 90.04 , 17.81 ) - white ( 100.01 , 16.12 ) 
      -intensity (90.961281 [log = -1.872116 ]- 98.728119 [log = -2.036906 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.080902 : rmin = 12.360615 |  kmin=-0.049461 : rmax = 20.218053 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.73 ) - k2 ( -0.02 , 0.28 ) 
retessellating defect 161 with 61 vertices (convex hull=92).
104 of 1726 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 13 edges
PATCH #:161:  FITNESS:   -60.49
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 367)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  7 (out of 70)
              BEST PATCH #: 448 (out of 705 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 161, we have euler=2 (160581,481737,321158) : difference with theory (2) = 0 

computing original vertex metric properties...
storing new metric properties...
computing tessellation statistics...
vertex spacing 0.89 +- 0.27 (0.01-->8.42) (max @ vno 60154 --> 167361)
face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00)
performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations...
vertex spacing 0.89 +- 0.27 (0.01-->8.42) (max @ vno 60154 --> 167361)
face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00)
tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface...
495 mutations (35.1%), 915 crossovers (64.9%), 489 vertices were eliminated
building final representation...
16246 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation
after topology correction, eno=2 (nv=160581, nf=321158, ne=481737, g=0)
writing corrected surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig...

0.000 % of the vertices (0 vertices) exhibit an orientation change
topology fixing took 709.7 minutes
reading brain volume from brain...
reading wm segmentation from wm...
0 defective edges
---------------------------------------------
Euler Number lh Fri Jan 20 16:52:42 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf
mris_euler_number /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig
euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 160581 - 481737 + 321158 = 2 --> 0 holes
      F =2V-4:          321158 = 321162-4 (0)
      2E=3F:            963474 = 963474 (0)

total defect index = 0
Euler: NHoles = 0
---------------------------------------------
Smooth2 lh Fri Jan 20 16:52:45 EST 2006
mris_smooth /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.smoothwm
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...
writing smoothed curvature to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.curv
writing smoothed area to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.area
---------------------------------------------
Inflation2 lh Fri Jan 20 16:53:00 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_inflate -dist 0 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.smoothwm /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.inflated
l_dist = 0.000
avg radius = 47.9 mm, total surface area = 81413 mm^2
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_spring_norm=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90
desired rms height=0.015
writing inflated surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.inflated
writing sulcal depths to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.sulc
inflation took 3.1 minutes
inflating to desired rms height = 0.015
000: dt: 0.0000, rms height=0.157, avgs=16
005: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.123, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
010: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.094, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
015: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.080, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
020: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.067, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
025: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.058, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
030: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.051, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
035: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.045, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
040: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.039, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
045: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.035, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
050: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.033, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
055: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.031, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00
060: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.029, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00

inflation complete.
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.sulc
---------------------------------------------
Make Final Surf lh Fri Jan 20 16:56:05 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_make_surfaces -w 0 EEsurf lh
write iterations = 0
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/filled...
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/brain...
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/wm...
13835 bright wm thresholded.
2371 bright non-wm voxels segmented.
computing class statistics...
border white:    320255 voxels (1.91%)
border gray      360228 voxels (2.15%)
WM: 101.0 +- 5.7 [70.0 --> 110.0]
GM: 84.2 +- 11.3 [30.0 --> 110.0]
setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 72.9 (was 70)
setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 106.7 (was 105)
setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 84.2 (was 85)
setting MAX_CSF to 61.6 (was 40)
setting MAX_GRAY to 95.2 (was 95)
setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 78.5 (was 75)
setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 50.4 (was 40)
reading original surface position from /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.orig...
repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000
vertex spacing 0.81 +- 0.26 (0.02-->8.00) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.28 +- 0.16 (0.00-->10.80)
mean absolute distance = 0.83 +- 1.16
6100 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.03-->8.00) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.28 +- 0.15 (0.00-->9.24)
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.29 (0.08-->7.95) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.28 +- 0.16 (0.00-->9.26)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.29 (0.08-->7.95) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.28 +- 0.16 (0.00-->9.26)
mean absolute distance = 0.60 +- 0.92
8612 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.06-->7.87) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->11.04)
mean absolute distance = 0.53 +- 0.72
6439 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.07-->7.86) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->11.10)
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.10-->7.77) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.19 (0.00-->11.17)
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.08-->7.73) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.19 (0.00-->11.14)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.08-->7.73) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.19 (0.00-->11.14)
mean absolute distance = 0.43 +- 0.58
5462 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.08-->7.65) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->10.92)
writing white matter surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.white...
writing smoothed curvature to lh.curv
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.28 (0.08-->7.65) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->10.92)
repositioning cortical surface to gray/csf boundary.
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.85 +- 0.31 (0.02-->7.69) (max @ vno 60154 --> 60180)
face area 0.27 +- 0.19 (0.00-->10.73)
vertex spacing 0.91 +- 0.37 (0.02-->7.81) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.27 +- 0.21 (0.00-->10.57)
vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.42 (0.03-->7.84) (max @ vno 60154 --> 158387)
face area 0.27 +- 0.23 (0.00-->10.04)
mean inside = 97.7, mean outside = 87.3
smoothing surface for 5 iterations...
mean border=93.2, 845 (845) missing vertices, mean dist 0.0 [0.9 (%45.9)->0.8 (%54.1))]
%77 local maxima, %21 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=3818960.5, rms=9.88
001: dt: 0.5000, sse=5926264.0, rms=8.24
002: dt: 0.5000, sse=6041095.0, rms=6.89
003: dt: 0.5000, sse=6200729.5, rms=5.57
004: dt: 0.5000, sse=6157959.5, rms=4.34
005: dt: 0.5000, sse=6214438.5, rms=3.71
006: dt: 0.5000, sse=6211549.0, rms=3.35
rms = 3.38, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
007: dt: 0.2500, sse=5279414.0, rms=3.12
rms = 3.13, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
008: dt: 0.1250, sse=5176930.5, rms=3.06
009: dt: 0.1250, sse=4937922.0, rms=2.98
rms = 2.97, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
010: dt: 0.1250, sse=4847227.0, rms=2.97
positioning took 16.5 minutes
mean border=94.3, 702 (360) missing vertices, mean dist -0.3 [0.7 (%61.8)->0.4 (%38.2))]
%84 local maxima, %15 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5005415.5, rms=3.90
011: dt: 0.5000, sse=5687149.0, rms=3.54
012: dt: 0.5000, sse=6219467.5, rms=3.23
rms = 3.35, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
013: dt: 0.2500, sse=5713476.0, rms=3.08
rms = 3.15, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 3.05, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
014: dt: 0.1250, sse=5653120.0, rms=3.05
positioning took 6.6 minutes
mean border=95.0, 740 (263) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.6 (%61.2)->0.4 (%38.8))]
%87 local maxima, %11 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5674765.0, rms=3.52
rms = 3.61, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
015: dt: 0.2500, sse=5576702.0, rms=3.33
016: dt: 0.2500, sse=5635349.0, rms=3.27
017: dt: 0.2500, sse=5739447.0, rms=3.19
018: dt: 0.2500, sse=5836350.0, rms=3.10
019: dt: 0.2500, sse=5882286.0, rms=3.03
020: dt: 0.2500, sse=5942217.0, rms=2.97
021: dt: 0.2500, sse=5959661.5, rms=2.92
022: dt: 0.2500, sse=5985989.0, rms=2.87
rms = 2.82, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
023: dt: 0.2500, sse=5975616.0, rms=2.82
024: dt: 0.1250, sse=5910842.0, rms=2.62
rms = 2.58, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
025: dt: 0.1250, sse=5906603.0, rms=2.58
positioning took 13.3 minutes
mean border=95.3, 832 (214) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.5 (%54.6)->0.4 (%45.4))]
%89 local maxima, %10 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5908979.0, rms=2.81
026: dt: 0.5000, sse=7523987.5, rms=2.69
rms = 2.70, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
027: dt: 0.2500, sse=7051345.5, rms=2.53
rms = 2.56, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
028: dt: 0.1250, sse=6986546.5, rms=2.46
029: dt: 0.1250, sse=6798880.0, rms=2.37
rms = 2.34, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
030: dt: 0.1250, sse=6759491.5, rms=2.34
positioning took 7.6 minutes
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.curv
smoothing surface for 5 iterations...
mean border=74.9, 1020 (1020) missing vertices, mean dist 1.3 [2.5 (%0.6)->3.7 (%99.4))]
%20 local maxima, %16 large gradients and %64 min vals, 1632 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6441176.0, rms=22.51
001: dt: 0.5000, sse=5975954.5, rms=20.65
002: dt: 0.5000, sse=5575207.0, rms=18.91
003: dt: 0.5000, sse=5268117.5, rms=17.24
004: dt: 0.5000, sse=5104259.5, rms=15.65
005: dt: 0.5000, sse=5100144.0, rms=14.08
006: dt: 0.5000, sse=5297248.5, rms=12.77
007: dt: 0.5000, sse=5577490.5, rms=11.52
008: dt: 0.5000, sse=5945720.0, rms=10.49
009: dt: 0.5000, sse=6271042.5, rms=9.45
010: dt: 0.5000, sse=6615361.0, rms=8.65
011: dt: 0.5000, sse=6926602.0, rms=7.83
012: dt: 0.5000, sse=7250911.0, rms=7.33
013: dt: 0.5000, sse=7464190.5, rms=6.81
014: dt: 0.5000, sse=7706706.0, rms=6.57
015: dt: 0.5000, sse=7790669.5, rms=6.23
016: dt: 0.5000, sse=7929387.5, rms=6.12
017: dt: 0.5000, sse=8010811.0, rms=5.89
rms = 5.88, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
018: dt: 0.5000, sse=8119779.5, rms=5.88
019: dt: 0.2500, sse=6390301.5, rms=5.44
rms = 5.40, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
020: dt: 0.2500, sse=6308755.5, rms=5vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.44 (0.04-->8.05) (max @ vno 85745 --> 85765)
face area 0.27 +- 0.24 (0.00-->10.08)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=8, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.44 (0.03-->9.29) (max @ vno 85745 --> 85765)
face area 0.35 +- 0.32 (0.00-->12.99)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.45 (0.03-->9.96) (max @ vno 85745 --> 85765)
face area 0.35 +- 0.32 (0.00-->12.96)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

writing pial surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.pial...
measuring cortical thickness...
writing cortical thickness estimate to 'thickness' file.
positioning took 133.6 minutes
.40
021: dt: 0.1250, sse=5829904.0, rms=5.20
022: dt: 0.1250, sse=5756895.5, rms=4.99
023: dt: 0.1250, sse=5750216.0, rms=4.93
rms = 4.92, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
024: dt: 0.1250, sse=5778635.5, rms=4.92
positioning took 39.2 minutes
mean border=73.9, 4525 (405) missing vertices, mean dist 0.2 [0.3 (%38.2)->0.9 (%61.8))]
%27 local maxima, %14 large gradients and %56 min vals, 1503 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6052848.0, rms=5.65
rms = 5.88, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
025: dt: 0.2500, sse=5870831.0, rms=5.40
026: dt: 0.2500, sse=5890447.0, rms=5.19
rms = 5.40, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
027: dt: 0.1250, sse=5802862.0, rms=5.14
rms = 5.14, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
028: dt: 0.1250, sse=5802862.0, rms=5.14
positioning took 9.7 minutes
mean border=74.0, 5703 (377) missing vertices, mean dist 0.1 [0.3 (%43.2)->0.8 (%56.8))]
%30 local maxima, %10 large gradients and %56 min vals, 1409 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5803755.0, rms=5.13
rms = 5.66, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
029: dt: 0.2500, sse=5798247.5, rms=4.99
rms = 4.97, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
030: dt: 0.2500, sse=6182921.0, rms=4.97
rms = 4.95, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
031: dt: 0.1250, sse=6015609.5, rms=4.95
positioning took 7.2 minutes
mean border=73.8, 12082 (359) missing vertices, mean dist 0.1 [0.3 (%45.4)->0.6 (%54.6))]
%30 local maxima, %10 large gradients and %53 min vals, 1393 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6021476.5, rms=4.95
rms = 4.99, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
032: dt: 0.2500, sse=6072512.5, rms=4.74
033: dt: 0.2500, sse=6585202.5, rms=4.60
rms = 4.94, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 4.57, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
034: dt: 0.1250, sse=6519441.5, rms=4.57
positioning took 9.5 minutes
0 of 160581 vertices processed
25000 of 160581 vertices processed
50000 of 160581 vertices processed
75000 of 160581 vertices processed
100000 of 160581 vertices processed
125000 of 160581 vertices processed
150000 of 160581 vertices processed
0 of 160581 vertices processed
25000 of 160581 vertices processed
50000 of 160581 vertices processed
75000 of 160581 vertices processed
100000 of 160581 vertices processed
125000 of 160581 vertices processed
150000 of 160581 vertices processed
thickness calculation complete, 943:2678 truncations.
32618 vertices at 0 distance
97955 vertices at 1 distance
95394 vertices at 2 distance
55625 vertices at 3 distance
24599 vertices at 4 distance
9168 vertices at 5 distance
3044 vertices at 6 distance
1127 vertices at 7 distance
438 vertices at 8 distance
215 vertices at 9 distance
164 vertices at 10 distance
158 vertices at 11 distance
121 vertices at 12 distance
114 vertices at 13 distance
72 vertices at 14 distance
41 vertices at 15 distance
61 vertices at 16 distance
93 vertices at 17 distance
56 vertices at 18 distance
51 vertices at 19 distance
48 vertices at 20 distance
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.thickness
---------------------------------------------
Making vol mask of cortical ribbon lh Fri Jan 20 19:09:44 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_surf2vol --mkmask --hemi lh --fillribbon --template orig --volregidentity EEsurf --outvol lh.ribbon.mgz
gdiagno = -1
Using identity matrix for registration
Qa2v: SurfXYZ to VolCRS: ------------------------------
-1.000   0.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000  -1.000   128.000;
 0.000   1.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
--------------------------------------------------
subjects dir   /home/christip/EE
hemi           lh
mksurfmask     1
projfrac       0
volreg file    (null)
outvol   path  lh.ribbon.mgz
template path  orig
------- Anat2Vol Registration (TkReg)----
 1.000   0.000   0.000   0.000;
 0.000   1.000   0.000   0.000;
 0.000   0.000   1.000   0.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
-----------------------------------------
height = 256
 width = 256
 depth = 256
 xsize = 1.000000
 ysize = 1.000000
 zsize = 1.000000
  cdc  = -1.000000 0.000000 0.000000
  rdc  = 0.000000 0.000000 -1.000000
  sdc  = 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
  xyz0 = -0.900009 -0.000068 0.000053
Gdiag_no  -1
Reading surface /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.white
Done reading source surface
Reading thickness /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/lh.thickness
Done
surf nframes = 1
INFO: mapping vertices to closest voxel
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.00, 98793 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.05, 99484 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.10, 100313 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.15, 101091 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.20, 101368 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.25, 100854 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.30, 99732 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.35, 97919 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.40, 95745 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.45, 94128 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.50, 92697 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.55, 91506 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.60, 90287 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.65, 89069 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.70, 87981 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.75, 86890 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.80, 85741 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.85, 84519 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.90, 83220 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.95, 81965 hits
INFO: writing output volume to lh.ribbon.mgz
done
----- Starting Hemisphere rh --------
---------------------------------------------
Tessellate rh Fri Jan 20 19:11:30 EST 2006
mri_tessellate /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/filled 127 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
slice 50: 1471 vertices, 1612 faces
slice 60: 8346 vertices, 8636 faces
slice 70: 19767 vertices, 20290 faces
slice 80: 32387 vertices, 32944 faces
slice 90: 46194 vertices, 46735 faces
slice 100: 60808 vertices, 61408 faces
slice 110: 75226 vertices, 75882 faces
slice 120: 89884 vertices, 90569 faces
slice 130: 103856 vertices, 104565 faces
slice 140: 117030 vertices, 117739 faces
slice 150: 129877 vertices, 130585 faces
slice 160: 140858 vertices, 141580 faces
slice 170: 151677 vertices, 152376 faces
slice 180: 160243 vertices, 160888 faces
slice 190: 167460 vertices, 168040 faces
slice 200: 172340 vertices, 172847 faces
slice 210: 173188 vertices, 173600 faces
slice 220: 173188 vertices, 173600 faces
slice 230: 173188 vertices, 173600 faces
slice 240: 173188 vertices, 173600 faces
slice 250: 173188 vertices, 173600 faces
using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points...
writing /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig
using ras2vox matrix:
-1.000   0.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   1.000  -128.000;
 0.000  -1.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
---------------------------------------------
Smooth1 rh Fri Jan 20 19:11:47 EST 2006
mris_smooth /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.smoothwm
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...
writing smoothed curvature to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.curv
writing smoothed area to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.area
---------------------------------------------
Inflation1 rh Fri Jan 20 19:12:06 EST 2006
mris_inflate -dist 0 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.smoothwm /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.inflated
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
l_dist = 0.000
avg radius = 47.0 mm, total surface area = 90699 mm^2
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_spring_norm=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90
desired rms height=0.015
writing inflated surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.inflated
writing sulcal depths to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.sulc
inflation took 3.3 minutes
inflating to desired rms height = 0.015
000: dt: 0.0000, rms height=0.198, avgs=16
005: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.153, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
010: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.126, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
015: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.114, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
020: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.103, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
025: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.095, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
030: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.090, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
035: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.086, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
040: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.081, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
045: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.080, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
050: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.077, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
055: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.075, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00
060: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.075, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00

inflation complete.
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.sulc
---------------------------------------------
QSphere rh Fri Jan 20 19:15:24 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_sphere -w 0 -inflate -in 200 -q /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.inflated /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.qsphere
using write iterations = 0
inflating brain...
inflation iterations = 200
doing quick spherical unfolding.
reading original vertex positions...
unfolding cortex into spherical form...
tol=1.0e+00, host=varda, nav=0, nbrs=1, l_spring_norm=1.000, l_sphere=0.025, l_convex=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90

surface projected - minimizing metric distortion...
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.52 (0.00-->9.93) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-1.08-->1.88)
tol=1.0e-01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

201: dt: 39.27, sse: 5466.0 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12084 (%0.566:%1.43), avgs: 32
202: dt: 0.29, sse: 5465.4 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12077 (%0.565:%1.42), avgs: 32
203: dt: 0.29, sse: 5464.7 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12078 (%0.563:%1.42), avgs: 32
204: dt: 0.29, sse: 5463.7 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12094 (%0.560:%1.42), avgs: 32
205: dt: 0.29, sse: 5462.7 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12106 (%0.556:%1.41), avgs: 32
206: dt: 0.29, sse: 5461.5 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12087 (%0.552:%1.41), avgs: 32
207: dt: 0.29, sse: 5460.3 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12079 (%0.548:%1.39), avgs: 32
208: dt: 0.29, sse: 5459.0 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12078 (%0.543:%1.38), avgs: 32
209: dt: 0.29, sse: 5457.7 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12069 (%0.538:%1.38), avgs: 32
210: dt: 0.29, sse: 5456.3 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12081 (%0.533:%1.37), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.38) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.46-->1.89)
211: dt: 0.29, sse: 5455.0 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12064 (%0.527:%1.36), avgs: 32
212: dt: 74.80, sse: 5433.5 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12322 (%0.413:%1.27), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.45) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.51-->1.89)
213: dt: 1.59, sse: 5428.3 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12365 (%0.392:%1.25), avgs: 8
214: dt: 0.15, sse: 5427.7 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12377 (%0.390:%1.25), avgs: 8
215: dt: 0.15, sse: 5426.9 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12393 (%0.386:%1.25), avgs: 8
216: dt: 0.15, sse: 5426.2 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12411 (%0.382:%1.24), avgs: 8
217: dt: 0.15, sse: 5425.5 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12427 (%0.379:%1.24), avgs: 8
218: dt: 0.15, sse: 5424.9 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12460 (%0.375:%1.24), avgs: 8
219: dt: 0.15, sse: 5424.2 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12487 (%0.372:%1.23), avgs: 8
220: dt: 0.15, sse: 5423.4 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12513 (%0.367:%1.23), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.44) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.23-->1.89)
221: dt: 0.15, sse: 5422.6 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12545 (%0.363:%1.22), avgs: 8
222: dt: 0.15, sse: 5421.8 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12573 (%0.359:%1.22), avgs: 8
223: dt: 0.15, sse: 5421.2 (0.084, 22.5, 0.148), neg: 12596 (%0.355:%1.21), avgs: 8
224: dt: 13.84, sse: 5417.4 (0.084, 22.7, 0.148), neg: 12954 (%0.323:%1.18), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.53) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.18-->1.89)
225: dt: 0.08, sse: 5416.8 (0.084, 22.7, 0.148), neg: 12995 (%0.321:%1.19), avgs: 2
226: dt: 0.09, sse: 5416.7 (0.084, 22.7, 0.148), neg: 13044 (%0.319:%1.19), avgs: 2
227: dt: 0.09, sse: 5416.4 (0.084, 22.7, 0.148), neg: 13107 (%0.316:%1.19), avgs: 2
228: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.9 (0.084, 22.7, 0.149), neg: 13149 (%0.312:%1.18), avgs: 2
229: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.5 (0.084, 22.7, 0.149), neg: 13190 (%0.309:%1.17), avgs: 2
230: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.3 (0.084, 22.7, 0.149), neg: 13241 (%0.306:%1.17), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.50) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.16-->1.89)
231: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.0 (0.084, 22.8, 0.149), neg: 13316 (%0.302:%1.16), avgs: 2
232: dt: 0.09, sse: 5414.9 (0.084, 22.8, 0.149), neg: 13380 (%0.300:%1.16), avgs: 2
233: dt: 0.09, sse: 5414.9 (0.084, 22.8, 0.149), neg: 13453 (%0.297:%1.16), avgs: 2
234: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.0 (0.084, 22.8, 0.149), neg: 13521 (%0.295:%1.15), avgs: 2
235: dt: 0.09, sse: 5415.0 (0.084, 22.9, 0.149), neg: 13627 (%0.293:%1.15), avgs: 2
236: dt: 0.10, sse: 5414.9 (0.084, 22.9, 0.149), neg: 13668 (%0.292:%1.16), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.36) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.10-->1.89)
237: dt: 0.02, sse: 5414.9 (0.084, 22.9, 0.149), neg: 13695 (%0.292:%1.16), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.35) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.10-->1.89)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

238: dt: 116.83, sse: 597.7 (0.084, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12769 (%0.245:%0.97), avgs: 32
239: dt: 0.29, sse: 598.0 (0.085, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12831 (%0.245:%0.96), avgs: 32
240: dt: 0.29, sse: 598.4 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 12902 (%0.245:%0.96), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->9.12) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.19-->1.89)
241: dt: 0.29, sse: 598.6 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 12969 (%0.244:%0.96), avgs: 32
242: dt: 0.29, sse: 598.8 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13002 (%0.244:%0.95), avgs: 32
243: dt: 0.29, sse: 598.9 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13039 (%0.244:%0.95), avgs: 32
244: dt: 0.29, sse: 599.0 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13069 (%0.243:%0.94), avgs: 32
245: dt: 0.29, sse: 599.1 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13116 (%0.243:%0.94), avgs: 32
246: dt: 0.29, sse: 599.1 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13138 (%0.242:%0.94), avgs: 32
247: dt: 0.29, sse: 599.1 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13151 (%0.241:%0.93), avgs: 32
248: dt: 0.29, sse: 599.1 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13161 (%0.241:%0.92), avgs: 32
249: dt: 24.76, sse: 596.4 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13092 (%0.232:%0.90), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.90) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.15-->1.89)
250: dt: 5.67, sse: 594.1 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13072 (%0.224:%0.89), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.89) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.19-->1.89)
251: dt: 0.15, sse: 594.1 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13097 (%0.224:%0.89), avgs: 8
252: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.9 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13113 (%0.223:%0.89), avgs: 8
253: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.8 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13120 (%0.222:%0.88), avgs: 8
254: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13117 (%0.222:%0.88), avgs: 8
255: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13125 (%0.222:%0.88), avgs: 8
256: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13141 (%0.222:%0.88), avgs: 8
257: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13167 (%0.222:%0.88), avgs: 8
258: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13174 (%0.222:%0.89), avgs: 8
259: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.5 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13177 (%0.221:%0.88), avgs: 8
260: dt: 0.15, sse: 593.2 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13185 (%0.220:%0.88), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.77) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.13-->1.90)
261: dt: 3.45, sse: 591.7 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13125 (%0.216:%0.87), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.76) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.20-->1.90)
262: dt: 0.19, sse: 591.0 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13145 (%0.213:%0.87), avgs: 2
263: dt: 0.09, sse: 590.2 (0.085, 22.6, 0.149), neg: 13158 (%0.210:%0.87), avgs: 2
264: dt: 0.09, sse: 589.6 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13155 (%0.208:%0.87), avgs: 2
265: dt: 0.09, sse: 588.7 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13161 (%0.204:%0.86), avgs: 2
266: dt: 0.09, sse: 587.8 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13146 (%0.200:%0.86), avgs: 2
267: dt: 0.09, sse: 586.9 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13137 (%0.197:%0.85), avgs: 2
268: dt: 0.09, sse: 585.8 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13120 (%0.193:%0.85), avgs: 2
269: dt: 0.09, sse: 584.7 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13113 (%0.189:%0.84), avgs: 2
270: dt: 0.09, sse: 583.9 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13144 (%0.187:%0.85), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.71) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.09-->1.90)
271: dt: 0.09, sse: 582.9 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13127 (%0.183:%0.85), avgs: 2
272: dt: 0.09, sse: 582.1 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13126 (%0.181:%0.84), avgs: 2
273: dt: 0.05, sse: 581.9 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13147 (%0.180:%0.85), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.68) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.08-->1.90)
274: dt: 0.03, sse: 581.8 (0.085, 22.5, 0.149), neg: 13193 (%0.180:%0.85), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.68) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.08-->1.90)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

275: dt: 63.25, sse: 104.8 (0.085, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12851 (%0.164:%0.84), avgs: 32
276: dt: 7.01, sse: 102.8 (0.085, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12838 (%0.157:%0.81), avgs: 32
277: dt: 0.29, sse: 102.3 (0.085, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12811 (%0.156:%0.81), avgs: 32
278: dt: 0.29, sse: 101.9 (0.085, 22.4, 0.149), neg: 12791 (%0.154:%0.81), avgs: 32
279: dt: 0.29, sse: 101.5 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12767 (%0.153:%0.80), avgs: 32
280: dt: 0.29, sse: 101.2 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12732 (%0.152:%0.80), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.51) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.25-->1.90)
281: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.9 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12721 (%0.151:%0.80), avgs: 32
282: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.7 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12712 (%0.150:%0.80), avgs: 32
283: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.6 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12700 (%0.150:%0.80), avgs: 32
284: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.4 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12697 (%0.149:%0.79), avgs: 32
285: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.4 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12693 (%0.149:%0.80), avgs: 32
286: dt: 0.29, sse: 100.3 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12669 (%0.149:%0.79), avgs: 32
287: dt: 9.78, sse: 99.8 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12628 (%0.147:%0.79), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.44) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.34-->1.90)
288: dt: 2.03, sse: 99.0 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12619 (%0.144:%0.78), avgs: 8
289: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.9 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12613 (%0.144:%0.78), avgs: 8
290: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.8 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12601 (%0.144:%0.78), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.40) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.15-->1.90)
291: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.6 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12571 (%0.143:%0.78), avgs: 8
292: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.4 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12554 (%0.142:%0.78), avgs: 8
293: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.2 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12566 (%0.142:%0.78), avgs: 8
294: dt: 0.15, sse: 98.0 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12556 (%0.141:%0.78), avgs: 8
295: dt: 0.15, sse: 97.7 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12541 (%0.140:%0.78), avgs: 8
296: dt: 0.15, sse: 97.5 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12531 (%0.139:%0.78), avgs: 8
297: dt: 0.15, sse: 97.2 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12517 (%0.138:%0.78), avgs: 8
298: dt: 0.15, sse: 96.9 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12514 (%0.137:%0.78), avgs: 8
299: dt: 1.93, sse: 96.6 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12518 (%0.136:%0.78), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.34) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.11-->1.90)
300: dt: 0.12, sse: 96.3 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12526 (%0.135:%0.77), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.34) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.11-->1.90)
301: dt: 0.09, sse: 95.9 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12500 (%0.133:%0.77), avgs: 2
302: dt: 0.09, sse: 95.4 (0.085, 22.3, 0.149), neg: 12488 (%0.131:%0.76), avgs: 2
303: dt: 0.09, sse: 94.5 (0.085, 22.2, 0.149), neg: 12464 (%0.128:%0.74), avgs: 2
304: dt: 0.09, sse: 94.2 (0.085, 22.2, 0.149), neg: 12450 (%0.127:%0.75), avgs: 2
305: dt: 0.09, sse: 93.6 (0.085, 22.2, 0.149), neg: 12427 (%0.125:%0.74), avgs: 2
306: dt: 0.09, sse: 93.2 (0.085, 22.2, 0.149), neg: 12422 (%0.123:%0.73), avgs: 2
307: dt: 0.09, sse: 92.6 (0.085, 22.2, 0.149), neg: 12398 (%0.121:%0.73), avgs: 2
308: dt: 0.09, sse: 92.2 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12391 (%0.120:%0.73), avgs: 2
309: dt: 0.09, sse: 91.5 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12363 (%0.117:%0.72), avgs: 2
310: dt: 0.09, sse: 91.1 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12336 (%0.116:%0.72), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.20) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.10-->1.90)
311: dt: 0.09, sse: 90.9 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12358 (%0.115:%0.73), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.20) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.08-->1.90)
312: dt: 0.00, sse: 90.9 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12358 (%0.115:%0.73), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.20) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.08-->1.90)
tol=1.8e+01, host=varda, nav=32, nbrs=1, l_nlarea=1.000
using quadratic fit line minimization

313: dt: 20.43, sse: 41.3 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12249 (%0.111:%0.71), avgs: 32
scaling brain by 0.591...
inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00)
000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=153.296, avgs=0
005: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.068, avgs=0
010: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.582, avgs=0
015: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.945, avgs=0
020: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.220, avgs=0
025: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.446, avgs=0
030: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.644, avgs=0
035: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.828, avgs=0
040: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.006, avgs=0
045: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.183, avgs=0
050: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.360, avgs=0
055: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.540, avgs=0
060: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.723, avgs=0
065: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.911, avgs=0
070: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.103, avgs=0
075: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.300, avgs=0
080: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.501, avgs=0
085: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.705, avgs=0
090: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.914, avgs=0
095: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.127, avgs=0
100: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.345, avgs=0
105: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.567, avgs=0
110: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.793, avgs=0
115: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.024, avgs=0
120: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.259, avgs=0
125: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.498, avgs=0
130: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.742, avgs=0
135: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.990, avgs=0
140: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.243, avgs=0
145: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.499, avgs=0
150: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.760, avgs=0
155: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.025, avgs=0
160: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.295, avgs=0
165: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.570, avgs=0
170: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.848, avgs=0
175: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.131, avgs=0
180: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=126.418, avgs=0
185: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=125.709, avgs=0
190: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=125.005, avgs=0
195: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=124.304, avgs=0
200: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=123.608, avgs=0

spherical inflation complete.
epoch 1 (K=20.0), pass 1, starting sse = 5524.89
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.02/37 = 0.00054
epoch 2 (K=80.0), pass 1, starting sse = 612.37
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.05/37 = 0.00135
epoch 3 (K=320.0), pass 1, starting sse = 108.88
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.17/38 = 0.00435
epoch 4 (K=1280.0), pass 1, starting sse = 42.41
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
taking momentum steps...
integr314: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.8 (0.085, 22.2, 0.150), neg: 12202 (%0.110:%0.71), avgs: 32
315: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.5 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12194 (%0.109:%0.72), avgs: 32
316: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.3 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12166 (%0.108:%0.72), avgs: 32
317: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12125 (%0.107:%0.71), avgs: 32
318: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12101 (%0.107:%0.71), avgs: 32
319: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12100 (%0.107:%0.72), avgs: 32
320: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12103 (%0.107:%0.72), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.08) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.21-->1.90)
321: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12082 (%0.107:%0.72), avgs: 32
322: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12066 (%0.107:%0.72), avgs: 32
323: dt: 0.29, sse: 40.0 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12049 (%0.107:%0.72), avgs: 32
324: dt: 17.07, sse: 39.4 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12008 (%0.105:%0.71), avgs: 32
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->8.04) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.18-->1.90)
325: dt: 1.86, sse: 38.8 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12031 (%0.103:%0.70), avgs: 8
326: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.7 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12015 (%0.103:%0.70), avgs: 8
327: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.6 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 12006 (%0.102:%0.70), avgs: 8
328: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.4 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11995 (%0.102:%0.71), avgs: 8
329: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.2 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11987 (%0.101:%0.71), avgs: 8
330: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.1 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11979 (%0.101:%0.71), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.99) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.15-->1.90)
331: dt: 0.15, sse: 38.0 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11969 (%0.100:%0.72), avgs: 8
332: dt: 0.15, sse: 37.8 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11954 (%0.099:%0.72), avgs: 8
333: dt: 0.15, sse: 37.6 (0.085, 22.1, 0.150), neg: 11966 (%0.099:%0.72), avgs: 8
334: dt: 0.15, sse: 37.5 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11957 (%0.098:%0.72), avgs: 8
335: dt: 0.15, sse: 37.3 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11920 (%0.098:%0.71), avgs: 8
336: dt: 3.62, sse: 36.8 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11882 (%0.096:%0.70), avgs: 8
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.93) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.15-->1.90)
337: dt: 0.19, sse: 36.4 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11884 (%0.095:%0.69), avgs: 2
338: dt: 0.08, sse: 36.0 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11904 (%0.093:%0.69), avgs: 2
339: dt: 0.08, sse: 35.9 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11920 (%0.093:%0.70), avgs: 2
340: dt: 0.09, sse: 35.5 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11884 (%0.092:%0.69), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.92) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.11-->1.90)
341: dt: 0.09, sse: 35.1 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11898 (%0.090:%0.70), avgs: 2
342: dt: 0.09, sse: 35.0 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11875 (%0.090:%0.70), avgs: 2
343: dt: 0.09, sse: 34.5 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11866 (%0.088:%0.70), avgs: 2
344: dt: 0.09, sse: 33.9 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11844 (%0.086:%0.69), avgs: 2
345: dt: 0.09, sse: 33.8 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11810 (%0.086:%0.69), avgs: 2
346: dt: 0.09, sse: 33.0 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11793 (%0.083:%0.69), avgs: 2
347: dt: 0.09, sse: 33.1 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11789 (%0.083:%0.70), avgs: 2
348: dt: 0.09, sse: 32.5 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11767 (%0.082:%0.70), avgs: 2
349: dt: 0.09, sse: 32.2 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11760 (%0.080:%0.70), avgs: 2
350: dt: 0.08, sse: 32.0 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11788 (%0.080:%0.69), avgs: 2
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.83) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.10-->1.90)
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.83) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.10-->1.90)
351: dt: 0.03, sse: 31.8 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11780 (%0.079:%0.69), avgs: 0
352: dt: 0.00, sse: 31.8 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11780 (%0.079:%0.69), avgs: 0
vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.53 (0.00-->7.83) (max @ vno 119301 --> 119302)
face area 0.09 +- 0.12 (-0.09-->1.90)
352: dt: 0.00, sse: 5391.2 (0.085, 22.0, 0.150), neg: 11780 (%0.079:%0.69), avgs: 32
writing spherical brain to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.qsphere
spherical transformation took 0.53 hours
ating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=32 and tol=3.200e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=8 and tol=1.671e+00
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
taking momentum steps...
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=2 and tol=9.648e-01
integrating with navgs=0 and tol=5.570e-01
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.25/40 = 0.00628
final distance error %28.00
optimization complete.
unfolding took 0.43 hours
---------------------------------------------
Fix Topology rh Fri Jan 20 19:47:16 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_fix_topology -ga EEsurf rh

*************************************************************
Setting options

using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters

*************************************************************
Topology Correction Parameters
retessellation mode:           genetic search
number of patches/generation : 10
number of generations :        10
surface mri loglikelihood coefficient :         1.0
volume mri loglikelihood coefficient :          10.0
normal dot loglikelihood coefficient :          1.0
quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0
volume resolution :                             2
eliminate vertices during search :              1
initial patch selection :                       1
select all defect vertices :                    0
ordering dependant retessellation:              0
use precomputed edge table :                    0
smooth retessellated patch :                    2
match retessellated patch :                     1
verbose mode :                                  0

*************************************************************
reading input surface /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.qsphere...
before topology correction, eno=-393 (nv=173188, nf=347200, ne=520781, g=197)
using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface...

Correction of the Topology
Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done
Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 8 iterations
marking ambiguous vertices...
30340 ambiguous faces found in tessellation
segmenting defects...
172 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions...
analyzing neighboring defects...
      -merging segment 22 into 15
      -merging segment 18 into 16
      -merging segment 30 into 27
      -merging segment 32 into 27
      -merging segment 37 into 35
      -merging segment 62 into 56
      -merging segment 61 into 60
      -merging segment 79 into 64
      -merging segment 85 into 64
      -merging segment 121 into 105
      -merging segment 123 into 105
      -merging segment 129 into 105
      -merging segment 135 into 105
      -merging segment 128 into 126
      -merging segment 136 into 130
      -merging segment 151 into 158
156 defects to be corrected 
0 vertices coincident
vertex 69055: degenerate normal
vertex 108875: degenerate normal
vertex 162723: degenerate normal
vertex 169695: degenerate normal
vertex 69055: degenerate normal
vertex 108875: degenerate normal
vertex 162723: degenerate normal
vertex 169695: degenerate normal
vertex 69055: degenerate normal
vertex 108875: degenerate normal
vertex 162723: degenerate normal
vertex 169695: degenerate normal
Computing Initial Surface Statistics
      -face       loglikelihood: -8.4160  (-4.2080)
      -vertex     loglikelihood: -5.4756  (-2.7378)
      -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.5141  (-3.5141)
      -quad curv  loglikelihood: -6.1763  (-3.0881)
      Total Loglikelihood : -23.5819

CORRECTING DEFECT 0
Computing statistics for defect 0 [ (113,140,52) - 92.591 ]
      -white ( 97.32 , 3.08 ) 
      -gray ( 84.88 , 9.89 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (84.876678 [log = -3.224148 ]- 97.319946 [log = -2.029745 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 0 with 300 vertices (convex hull=314).
5744 of 39106 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 30 by 38 by 36 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 181 edges
                 cluster 1 has 176 edges
                 cluster 2 has 19 edges
                 cluster 3 has 12 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
l_mri = 1.00 l_unmri = 10.00 l_curv = 1.00 l_qcurv = 1.00 
PATCH #:000:  FITNESS:   -89.15
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 498)
              BEST PATCH #: 6 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 0, we have euler=-164 (154785,456759,301810) : difference with theory (-153) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 1
Computing statistics for defect 1 [ (105,124,51) - 93.875 ]
      -white ( 99.66 , 3.61 ) 
      -gray ( 84.67 , 9.44 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (84.669060 [log = -3.025178 ]- 99.659248 [log = -2.146706 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 1 with 89 vertices (convex hull=125).
119 of 3797 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 21 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 46 edges
                 cluster 1 has 42 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
PATCH #:001:  FITNESS:   -74.48
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 363)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  12 (out of 85)
              BEST PATCH #: 430 (out of 701 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 1, we have euler=-163 (154806,456877,301908) : difference with theory (-152) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 2
Computing statistics for defect 2 [ (100,136,53) - 93.628 ]
      -white ( 98.38 , 3.52 ) 
      -gray ( 87.33 , 7.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.331917 [log = -2.861231 ]- 98.384331 [log = -2.170869 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 2 with 176 vertices (convex hull=222).
586 of 14814 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 31 by 24 by 21 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 154 edges
                 cluster 1 has 36 edges
                 cluster 2 has 21 edges
                 cluster 3 has 18 edges
                 cluster 4 has 16 edges
PATCH #:002:  FITNESS:   -71.25
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 364)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  30 (out of 176)
              BEST PATCH #: 443 (out of 702 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 2, we have euler=-162 (154855,457119,302102) : difference with theory (-151) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 3
Computing statistics for defect 3 [ (103,151,51) - 92.825 ]
      -white ( 98.32 , 2.65 ) 
      -gray ( 91.64 , 2.29 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.635429 [log = -1.764150 ]- 98.320145 [log = -1.901349 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 3 with 10 vertices (convex hull=22).
1 of 44 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 9 by 8 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:003:  FITNESS:   -60.69
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 170)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 11)
              BEST PATCH #: 160 (out of 332 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 3, we have euler=-161 (154856,457128,302111) : difference with theory (-150) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 4
Computing statistics for defect 4 [ (113,126,54) - 95.574 ]
      -white ( 100.86 , 3.58 ) 
      -gray ( 91.39 , 3.99 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.392151 [log = -2.185198 ]- 100.857216 [log = -2.185142 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 4 with 61 vertices (convex hull=103).
103 of 1727 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 46 edges
                 cluster 1 has 22 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:004:  FITNESS:   -66.65
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 446)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 400)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  10 (out of 42)
              BEST PATCH #: 676 (out of 856 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 4, we have euler=-160 (154865,457194,302169) : difference with theory (-149) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 5
Computing statistics for defect 5 [ (105,115,57) - 94.337 ]
      -white ( 98.52 , 3.62 ) 
      -gray ( 88.96 , 4.32 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.957359 [log = -2.288402 ]- 98.521645 [log = -2.351402 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 5 with 191 vertices (convex hull=239).
976 of 17169 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 27 by 19 by 31 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 186 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 19 edges
                 cluster 3 has 12 edges
                 cluster 4 has 7 edges
PATCH #:005:  FITNESS:   -66.72
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 152)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 145)
              BEST PATCH #: 33 (out of 298 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 5, we have euler=-159 (154938,457533,302436) : difference with theory (-148) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 6
Computing statistics for defect 6 [ (84,134,57) - 93.604 ]
      -white ( 96.86 , 3.28 ) 
      -gray ( 87.55 , 7.61 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.547752 [log = -2.608890 ]- 96.863373 [log = -2.099693 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 6 with 41 vertices (convex hull=70).
76 of 744 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 11 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:006:  FITNESS:   -69.80
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 275)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 28)
              BEST PATCH #: 349 (out of 533 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 6, we have euler=-158 (154947,457589,302484) : difference with theory (-147) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 7
Computing statistics for defect 7 [ (101,149,59) - 94.378 ]
      -white ( 98.64 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 91.39 , 2.56 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.388741 [log = -1.877241 ]- 98.641396 [log = -1.975990 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 7 with 51 vertices (convex hull=77).
140 of 1135 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 33 edges
                 cluster 1 has 5 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:007:  FITNESS:   -62.61
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 209)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 81)
              BEST PATCH #: 148 (out of 411 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 7, we have euler=-157 (154964,457672,302551) : difference with theory (-146) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 8
Computing statistics for defect 8 [ (111,149,60) - 94.500 ]
      -white ( 98.91 , 3.20 ) 
      -gray ( 90.87 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.865685 [log = -1.919324 ]- 98.908676 [log = -1.967184 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 8 with 115 vertices (convex hull=142).
625 of 5930 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 23 by 16 by 26 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 7 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 37 edges
                 cluster 1 has 26 edges
                 cluster 2 has 26 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 7 edges
PATCH #:008:  FITNESS:   -63.53
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 213)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 182)
              BEST PATCH #: 146 (out of 415 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 8, we have euler=-156 (155014,457886,302716) : difference with theory (-145) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 9
Computing statistics for defect 9 [ (117,128,64) - 93.318 ]
      -white ( 98.06 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 88.90 , 4.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.903374 [log = -2.324904 ]- 98.059311 [log = -2.074250 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 9 with 414 vertices (convex hull=493).
12642 of 72849 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 38 by 37 by 33 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (10 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 255 edges
                 cluster 1 has 90 edges
                 cluster 2 has 33 edges
                 cluster 3 has 29 edges
                 cluster 4 has 18 edges
                 cluster 5 has 18 edges
                 cluster 6 has 17 edges
                 cluster 7 has 11 edges
                 cluster 8 has 10 edges
                 cluster 9 has 8 edges
PATCH #:009:  FITNESS:   -67.28
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 31)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 24)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 470)
              BEST PATCH #: 11 (out of 60 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 9, we have euler=-155 (155177,458629,303297) : difference with theory (-144) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 10
Computing statistics for defect 10 [ (83,116,61) - 94.856 ]
      -white ( 98.14 , 3.57 ) 
      -gray ( 91.77 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.768188 [log = -1.959373 ]- 98.140549 [log = -2.086546 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 10 with 58 vertices (convex hull=72).
219 of 1434 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 16 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 11 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
PATCH #:010:  FITNESS:   -66.09
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 270)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 61)
              BEST PATCH #: 257 (out of 520 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 10, we have euler=-154 (155194,458713,303365) : difference with theory (-143) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 11
Computing statistics for defect 11 [ (120,146,61) - 92.907 ]
      -white ( 97.39 , 2.77 ) 
      -gray ( 89.00 , 3.74 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.000214 [log = -2.221988 ]- 97.394348 [log = -1.905562 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 11 with 7 vertices (convex hull=17).
0 of 21 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 8 by 7 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:011:  FITNESS:   -63.22
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 90)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 80)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 5 (out of 180 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 11, we have euler=-153 (155194,458717,303370) : difference with theory (-142) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 12
Computing statistics for defect 12 [ (92,95,64) - 93.969 ]
      -white ( 98.65 , 3.40 ) 
      -gray ( 90.56 , 4.79 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.562737 [log = -2.319825 ]- 98.646523 [log = -2.173553 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 12 with 84 vertices (convex hull=110).
513 of 2973 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 19 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 66 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:012:  FITNESS:   -66.52
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 268)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 66)
              BEST PATCH #: 259 (out of 518 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 12, we have euler=-152 (155219,458843,303472) : difference with theory (-141) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 13
Computing statistics for defect 13 [ (80,139,63) - 94.221 ]
      -white ( 99.02 , 3.94 ) 
      -gray ( 89.99 , 3.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.987709 [log = -2.241462 ]- 99.016624 [log = -2.421299 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 13 with 82 vertices (convex hull=106).
392 of 2929 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 21 by 19 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 52 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
                 cluster 3 has 8 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:013:  FITNESS:   -70.38
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 240)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 118)
              BEST PATCH #: 197 (out of 466 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 13, we have euler=-151 (155250,458984,303583) : difference with theory (-140) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 14
Computing statistics for defect 14 [ (119,144,63) - 95.191 ]
      -white ( 97.69 , 2.58 ) 
      -gray ( 88.89 , 4.32 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.885460 [log = -2.371872 ]- 97.694870 [log = -1.844701 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 14 with 12 vertices (convex hull=20).
0 of 66 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 9 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
PATCH #:014:  FITNESS:   -67.40
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 204)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 12)
              BEST PATCH #: 220 (out of 398 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 14, we have euler=-150 (155255,459003,303598) : difference with theory (-139) = 11 


CORRECTING DEFECT 15
Computing statistics for defect 15 [ (118,148,65) - 94.998 ]
      -white ( 98.60 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.46 , 3.39 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.458473 [log = -2.182443 ]- 98.599632 [log = -2.026155 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 15 with 89 vertices (convex hull=129).
442 of 3474 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 18 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 53 edges
                 cluster 1 has 26 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
                 cluster 3 has 8 edges
                 cluster 4 has 7 edges
PATCH #:015:  FITNESS:   -64.07
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 186)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 73)
              BEST PATCH #: 95 (out of 364 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 15, we have euler=-148 (155285,459150,303717) : difference with theory (-138) = 10 


CORRECTING DEFECT 16
Computing statistics for defect 16 [ (117,111,69) - 94.373 ]
      -white ( 99.54 , 3.36 ) 
      -gray ( 90.52 , 2.86 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.520813 [log = -1.935697 ]- 99.538208 [log = -2.174722 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 16 with 194 vertices (convex hull=211).
2783 of 15938 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 23 by 29 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 198 edges
                 cluster 1 has 32 edges
                 cluster 2 has 24 edges
                 cluster 3 has 14 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
PATCH #:016:  FITNESS:   -64.40
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 169)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 138)
              BEST PATCH #: 72 (out of 331 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 16, we have euler=-146 (155361,459493,303986) : difference with theory (-137) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 17
Computing statistics for defect 17 [ (81,106,68) - 95.498 ]
      -white ( 99.25 , 3.16 ) 
      -gray ( 91.71 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.709824 [log = -1.959787 ]- 99.250153 [log = -2.114988 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 17 with 36 vertices (convex hull=59).
43 of 587 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 10 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
PATCH #:017:  FITNESS:   -62.40
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 407)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 368)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 27)
              BEST PATCH #: 603 (out of 785 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 17, we have euler=-145 (155370,459541,304026) : difference with theory (-136) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 18
Computing statistics for defect 18 [ (120,120,69) - 93.938 ]
      -white ( 96.51 , 3.11 ) 
      -gray ( 87.59 , 4.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.589386 [log = -2.457103 ]- 96.511063 [log = -2.111196 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 18 with 11 vertices (convex hull=29).
0 of 55 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 9 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:018:  FITNESS:   -67.76
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 144)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 100 (out of 282 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 18, we have euler=-144 (155371,459551,304036) : difference with theory (-135) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 19
Computing statistics for defect 19 [ (109,122,69) - 95.092 ]
      -white ( 99.68 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 91.40 , 3.39 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.402176 [log = -1.999344 ]- 99.680489 [log = -2.083190 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 19 with 18 vertices (convex hull=34).
15 of 138 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 9 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:019:  FITNESS:   -60.55
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 103 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 19, we have euler=-143 (155374,459573,304056) : difference with theory (-134) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 20
Computing statistics for defect 20 [ (115,142,68) - 93.303 ]
      -white ( 99.45 , 3.33 ) 
      -gray ( 90.14 , 3.32 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.144028 [log = -2.024679 ]- 99.452408 [log = -2.132081 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 20 with 9 vertices (convex hull=19).
1 of 35 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 8 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:020:  FITNESS:   -61.46
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 150)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 126 (out of 296 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 20, we have euler=-142 (155375,459581,304064) : difference with theory (-133) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 21
Computing statistics for defect 21 [ (122,135,73) - 93.696 ]
      -white ( 97.43 , 2.35 ) 
      -gray ( 89.34 , 3.72 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.337273 [log = -2.349958 ]- 97.427582 [log = -1.804774 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 21 with 13 vertices (convex hull=29).
0 of 78 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 10 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:021:  FITNESS:   -60.82
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 223)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 11)
              BEST PATCH #: 257 (out of 433 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 21, we have euler=-141 (155377,459595,304077) : difference with theory (-132) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 22
Computing statistics for defect 22 [ (121,91,76) - 94.363 ]
      -white ( 98.32 , 2.94 ) 
      -gray ( 89.83 , 3.50 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.833466 [log = -2.001912 ]- 98.320488 [log = -1.991508 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 22 with 66 vertices (convex hull=101).
287 of 1858 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 17 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 30 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:022:  FITNESS:   -65.77
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 206)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 94)
              BEST PATCH #: 129 (out of 400 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 22, we have euler=-140 (155393,459691,304158) : difference with theory (-131) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 23
Computing statistics for defect 23 [ (83,94,74) - 94.313 ]
      -white ( 98.97 , 3.13 ) 
      -gray ( 91.58 , 2.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.580032 [log = -1.937487 ]- 98.965385 [log = -2.136258 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 23 with 33 vertices (convex hull=52).
17 of 511 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 33 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
PATCH #:023:  FITNESS:   -61.99
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 211)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 239 (out of 413 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 23, we have euler=-139 (155404,459742,304199) : difference with theory (-130) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 24
Computing statistics for defect 24 [ (117,97,77) - 94.477 ]
      -white ( 99.38 , 3.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.38 , 2.63 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.376427 [log = -1.901732 ]- 99.380234 [log = -2.073199 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 24 with 81 vertices (convex hull=113).
162 of 3078 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 20 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 55 edges
                 cluster 1 has 42 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:024:  FITNESS:   -64.49
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 213)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 81)
              BEST PATCH #: 144 (out of 415 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 24, we have euler=-138 (155431,459876,304307) : difference with theory (-129) = 9 


CORRECTING DEFECT 25
Computing statistics for defect 25 [ (116,127,79) - 93.596 ]
      -white ( 97.40 , 3.20 ) 
      -gray ( 88.76 , 4.39 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.759178 [log = -2.308322 ]- 97.403572 [log = -2.105411 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 25 with 185 vertices (convex hull=234).
3078 of 13942 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 28 by 21 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 7 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 90 edges
                 cluster 1 has 65 edges
                 cluster 2 has 16 edges
                 cluster 3 has 15 edges
                 cluster 4 has 7 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
PATCH #:025:  FITNESS:   -69.31
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 205)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 265)
              BEST PATCH #: 128 (out of 399 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 25, we have euler=-135 (155496,460194,304563) : difference with theory (-128) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 26
Computing statistics for defect 26 [ (122,138,74) - 94.565 ]
      -white ( 97.80 , 2.45 ) 
      -gray ( 90.80 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.795502 [log = -1.994429 ]- 97.804596 [log = -1.806502 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 26 with 10 vertices (convex hull=23).
1 of 44 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 9 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
PATCH #:026:  FITNESS:   -59.83
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 279)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 5)
              BEST PATCH #: 363 (out of 537 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 26, we have euler=-134 (155497,460203,304572) : difference with theory (-127) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 27
Computing statistics for defect 27 [ (73,121,76) - 94.241 ]
      -white ( 99.08 , 3.35 ) 
      -gray ( 90.60 , 2.49 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.595184 [log = -1.846772 ]- 99.084526 [log = -2.160732 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 27 with 41 vertices (convex hull=63).
32 of 788 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:027:  FITNESS:   -60.77
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 283)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 28)
              BEST PATCH #: 377 (out of 549 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 27, we have euler=-133 (155505,460253,304615) : difference with theory (-126) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 28
Computing statistics for defect 28 [ (110,120,77) - 95.389 ]
      -white ( 100.40 , 3.32 ) 
      -gray ( 91.78 , 2.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.782974 [log = -1.839471 ]- 100.401405 [log = -2.133708 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 28 with 50 vertices (convex hull=83).
103 of 1122 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 37 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
PATCH #:028:  FITNESS:   -61.62
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 196)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 115 (out of 382 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 28, we have euler=-132 (155521,460332,304679) : difference with theory (-125) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 29
Computing statistics for defect 29 [ (119,134,77) - 93.879 ]
      -white ( 97.66 , 2.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.74 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.740967 [log = -1.889113 ]- 97.663910 [log = -1.872408 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 29 with 14 vertices (convex hull=31).
1 of 90 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 7 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:029:  FITNESS:   -58.12
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 247)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 11)
              BEST PATCH #: 301 (out of 481 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 29, we have euler=-131 (155524,460349,304694) : difference with theory (-124) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 30
Computing statistics for defect 30 [ (76,136,79) - 94.711 ]
      -white ( 98.65 , 3.80 ) 
      -gray ( 90.56 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.555244 [log = -2.001928 ]- 98.646652 [log = -2.349393 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 30 with 40 vertices (convex hull=67).
82 of 698 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 11 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 35 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:030:  FITNESS:   -62.96
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 242)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 284 (out of 468 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 30, we have euler=-130 (155533,460404,304741) : difference with theory (-123) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 31
Computing statistics for defect 31 [ (85,151,80) - 94.162 ]
      -white ( 99.22 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 90.35 , 2.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.345322 [log = -1.874241 ]- 99.223633 [log = -1.989480 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 31 with 130 vertices (convex hull=160).
1299 of 7086 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 23 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 117 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 13 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:031:  FITNESS:   -60.90
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 276)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 100)
              BEST PATCH #: 273 (out of 534 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 31, we have euler=-128 (155574,460611,304909) : difference with theory (-122) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 32
Computing statistics for defect 32 [ (114,146,79) - 95.860 ]
      -white ( 99.44 , 2.94 ) 
      -gray ( 91.30 , 3.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.298004 [log = -2.118129 ]- 99.442574 [log = -2.052659 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 32 with 16 vertices (convex hull=31).
2 of 118 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
PATCH #:032:  FITNESS:   -62.91
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 196)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 14)
              BEST PATCH #: 212 (out of 382 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 32, we have euler=-127 (155577,460631,304927) : difference with theory (-121) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 33
Computing statistics for defect 33 [ (109,134,80) - 92.455 ]
      -white ( 97.38 , 3.05 ) 
      -gray ( 89.85 , 3.42 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.854294 [log = -2.126971 ]- 97.382584 [log = -1.987124 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 33 with 11 vertices (convex hull=24).
1 of 54 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 7 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 6 edges
PATCH #:033:  FITNESS:   -64.16
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 115)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 9)
              BEST PATCH #: 55 (out of 229 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 33, we have euler=-126 (155578,460641,304937) : difference with theory (-120) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 34
Computing statistics for defect 34 [ (88,89,81) - 93.292 ]
      -white ( 97.70 , 2.91 ) 
      -gray ( 87.15 , 4.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.154129 [log = -2.439494 ]- 97.698082 [log = -2.017104 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 34 with 52 vertices (convex hull=71).
77 of 1249 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 14 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 37 edges
                 cluster 1 has 32 edges
PATCH #:034:  FITNESS:   -68.52
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 160)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 48)
              BEST PATCH #: 51 (out of 314 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 34, we have euler=-125 (155598,460731,305008) : difference with theory (-119) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 35
Computing statistics for defect 35 [ (85,97,81) - 95.207 ]
      -white ( 99.76 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 91.47 , 2.68 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.473465 [log = -1.898618 ]- 99.761536 [log = -2.102806 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 35 with 50 vertices (convex hull=67).
165 of 1060 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 54 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:035:  FITNESS:   -64.25
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 247)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 38)
              BEST PATCH #: 212 (out of 481 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 35, we have euler=-124 (155616,460816,305076) : difference with theory (-118) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 36
Computing statistics for defect 36 [ (68,128,81) - 92.799 ]
      -white ( 97.19 , 3.09 ) 
      -gray ( 90.27 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.268112 [log = -2.075296 ]- 97.187927 [log = -2.076777 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 36 with 10 vertices (convex hull=19).
1 of 44 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
PATCH #:036:  FITNESS:   -62.22
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 153)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 37)
              BEST PATCH #: 127 (out of 299 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 36, we have euler=-123 (155619,460829,305087) : difference with theory (-117) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 37
Computing statistics for defect 37 [ (104,147,84) - 94.644 ]
      -white ( 99.76 , 4.01 ) 
      -gray ( 90.79 , 3.26 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.786301 [log = -2.090638 ]- 99.756081 [log = -2.298320 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 37 with 244 vertices (convex hull=286).
4054 of 25592 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 36 by 24 by 26 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 7 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 199 edges
                 cluster 1 has 56 edges
                 cluster 2 has 14 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
                 cluster 4 has 11 edges
                 cluster 5 has 11 edges
                 cluster 6 has 7 edges
PATCH #:037:  FITNESS:   -68.50
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 149)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 310)
              BEST PATCH #: 26 (out of 295 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 37, we have euler=-122 (155722,461280,305436) : difference with theory (-116) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 38
Computing statistics for defect 38 [ (68,110,83) - 92.786 ]
      -white ( 98.03 , 4.01 ) 
      -gray ( 88.84 , 7.14 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.835747 [log = -2.788441 ]- 98.028366 [log = -2.418471 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 38 with 92 vertices (convex hull=112).
446 of 3740 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 105 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:038:  FITNESS:   -73.43
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 275)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 91)
              BEST PATCH #: 272 (out of 533 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 38, we have euler=-121 (155758,461440,305561) : difference with theory (-115) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 39
Computing statistics for defect 39 [ (122,114,83) - 94.967 ]
      -white ( 99.28 , 3.11 ) 
      -gray ( 90.87 , 2.59 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.866226 [log = -1.856554 ]- 99.279160 [log = -2.079619 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 39 with 40 vertices (convex hull=57).
37 of 743 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:039:  FITNESS:   -60.48
              MUTATIONS: 10 (out of 382)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 344)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 38)
              BEST PATCH #: 564 (out of 736 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 39, we have euler=-120 (155767,461492,305605) : difference with theory (-114) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 40
Computing statistics for defect 40 [ (120,83,84) - 94.256 ]
      -white ( 98.21 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 87.98 , 4.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.977440 [log = -2.505210 ]- 98.209465 [log = -2.078758 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 40 with 86 vertices (convex hull=120).
354 of 3301 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 54 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
                 cluster 3 has 9 edges
PATCH #:040:  FITNESS:   -70.38
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 302)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 76)
              BEST PATCH #: 315 (out of 584 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 40, we have euler=-119 (155790,461617,305708) : difference with theory (-113) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 41
Computing statistics for defect 41 [ (68,120,83) - 93.298 ]
      -white ( 96.26 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 86.78 , 8.44 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.778076 [log = -2.945332 ]- 96.258118 [log = -2.065666 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 41 with 14 vertices (convex hull=30).
1 of 90 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 6 edges
PATCH #:041:  FITNESS:   -73.95
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 207)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 215 (out of 401 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 41, we have euler=-118 (155791,461630,305721) : difference with theory (-112) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 42
Computing statistics for defect 42 [ (120,99,86) - 93.777 ]
      -white ( 99.35 , 3.56 ) 
      -gray ( 89.91 , 2.57 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.909775 [log = -1.852788 ]- 99.347664 [log = -2.306620 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 42 with 68 vertices (convex hull=94).
388 of 1890 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 15 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
                 cluster 3 has 8 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:042:  FITNESS:   -64.64
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 232)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 77)
              BEST PATCH #: 195 (out of 450 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 42, we have euler=-117 (155809,461731,305805) : difference with theory (-111) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 43
Computing statistics for defect 43 [ (82,95,86) - 94.876 ]
      -white ( 98.88 , 3.10 ) 
      -gray ( 91.38 , 2.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.383621 [log = -1.747437 ]- 98.875679 [log = -2.073433 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 43 with 12 vertices (convex hull=22).
6 of 60 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 6 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 1 edges
PATCH #:043:  FITNESS:   -62.40
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 197)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 14)
              BEST PATCH #: 201 (out of 383 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 43, we have euler=-116 (155811,461744,305817) : difference with theory (-110) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 44
Computing statistics for defect 44 [ (69,130,91) - 92.174 ]
      -white ( 98.53 , 4.68 ) 
      -gray ( 86.97 , 10.26 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.969376 [log = -2.674471 ]- 98.534439 [log = -2.380827 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 44 with 236 vertices (convex hull=294).
1443 of 26287 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 43 by 27 by 25 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 8 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 253 edges
                 cluster 1 has 20 edges
                 cluster 2 has 11 edges
                 cluster 3 has 7 edges
                 cluster 4 has 7 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 7 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
PATCH #:044:  FITNESS:   -73.68
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 205)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 250)
              BEST PATCH #: 132 (out of 399 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 44, we have euler=-115 (155905,462166,306146) : difference with theory (-109) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 45
Computing statistics for defect 45 [ (69,118,90) - 93.923 ]
      -white ( 98.78 , 3.72 ) 
      -gray ( 88.94 , 5.29 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.943825 [log = -2.406426 ]- 98.783325 [log = -2.276863 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 45 with 101 vertices (convex hull=128).
408 of 4642 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 22 by 17 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 95 edges
                 cluster 1 has 23 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:045:  FITNESS:   -68.16
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 84)
              BEST PATCH #: 7 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 45, we have euler=-114 (155942,462338,306282) : difference with theory (-108) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 46
Computing statistics for defect 46 [ (117,136,87) - 96.244 ]
      -white ( 97.56 , 3.21 ) 
      -gray ( 89.49 , 4.47 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.488724 [log = -2.436165 ]- 97.558578 [log = -2.082463 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 46 with 15 vertices (convex hull=30).
0 of 105 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 7 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:046:  FITNESS:   -67.34
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 98)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 88)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 20)
              BEST PATCH #: 18 (out of 196 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 46, we have euler=-113 (155944,462354,306297) : difference with theory (-107) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 47
Computing statistics for defect 47 [ (121,129,92) - 95.014 ]
      -white ( 99.97 , 3.55 ) 
      -gray ( 91.04 , 2.77 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.036186 [log = -1.915202 ]- 99.967850 [log = -2.222427 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 47 with 45 vertices (convex hull=78).
106 of 884 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 17 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:047:  FITNESS:   -62.89
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 195)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 36)
              BEST PATCH #: 199 (out of 381 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 47, we have euler=-112 (155956,462420,306352) : difference with theory (-106) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 48
Computing statistics for defect 48 [ (70,123,95) - 92.708 ]
      -white ( 97.97 , 5.37 ) 
      -gray ( 88.29 , 5.27 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.290833 [log = -2.527027 ]- 97.974373 [log = -2.602519 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 48 with 169 vertices (convex hull=214).
937 of 13259 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 35 by 21 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 8 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 78 edges
                 cluster 1 has 51 edges
                 cluster 2 has 15 edges
                 cluster 3 has 12 edges
                 cluster 4 has 12 edges
                 cluster 5 has 11 edges
                 cluster 6 has 9 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
PATCH #:048:  FITNESS:   -73.17
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 178)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 141)
              BEST PATCH #: 93 (out of 348 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 48, we have euler=-111 (156020,462717,306586) : difference with theory (-105) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 49
Computing statistics for defect 49 [ (68,145,99) - 94.457 ]
      -white ( 99.74 , 4.68 ) 
      -gray ( 89.15 , 5.24 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.152496 [log = -2.303682 ]- 99.735085 [log = -2.663801 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 49 with 295 vertices (convex hull=323).
3502 of 39863 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 36 by 34 by 28 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 6 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 321 edges
                 cluster 1 has 44 edges
                 cluster 2 has 28 edges
                 cluster 3 has 26 edges
                 cluster 4 has 12 edges
                 cluster 5 has 9 edges
PATCH #:049:  FITNESS:   -72.06
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 283)
              BEST PATCH #: 22 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 49, we have euler=-110 (156148,463271,307013) : difference with theory (-104) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 50
Computing statistics for defect 50 [ (64,138,95) - 89.901 ]
      -white ( 96.23 , 4.58 ) 
      -gray ( 78.62 , 16.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (78.617111 [log = -3.981656 ]- 96.232224 [log = -2.509107 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 50 with 116 vertices (convex hull=144).
562 of 6108 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 20 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 118 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:050:  FITNESS:   -85.43
              MUTATIONS: 9 (out of 430)
              CROSSOVERS: 11 (out of 392)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  22 (out of 140)
              BEST PATCH #: 569 (out of 832 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 50, we have euler=-109 (156173,463415,307133) : difference with theory (-103) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 51
Computing statistics for defect 51 [ (73,158,97) - 95.019 ]
      -white ( 98.98 , 3.47 ) 
      -gray ( 90.62 , 2.97 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.615166 [log = -1.997776 ]- 98.976845 [log = -2.207073 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 51 with 116 vertices (convex hull=158).
809 of 5861 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 24 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 78 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:051:  FITNESS:   -68.58
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 241)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 99)
              BEST PATCH #: 204 (out of 467 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 51, we have euler=-107 (156211,463606,307288) : difference with theory (-102) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 52
Computing statistics for defect 52 [ (72,96,96) - 94.482 ]
      -white ( 99.20 , 4.50 ) 
      -gray ( 90.70 , 6.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.698723 [log = -2.250074 ]- 99.196030 [log = -2.534567 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 52 with 68 vertices (convex hull=97).
194 of 2084 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 20 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
PATCH #:052:  FITNESS:   -69.72
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 407)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 368)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  14 (out of 90)
              BEST PATCH #: 603 (out of 785 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 52, we have euler=-106 (156222,463680,307352) : difference with theory (-101) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 53
Computing statistics for defect 53 [ (81,160,95) - 94.283 ]
      -white ( 97.74 , 2.68 ) 
      -gray ( 91.63 , 3.88 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.630020 [log = -2.051676 ]- 97.741951 [log = -1.927062 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 53 with 7 vertices (convex hull=16).
0 of 21 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 6 by 7 (scale = 2)
PATCH #:053:  FITNESS:   -64.86
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 116)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 46 (out of 230 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 53, we have euler=-105 (156222,463684,307357) : difference with theory (-100) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 54
Computing statistics for defect 54 [ (67,105,99) - 93.831 ]
      -white ( 98.99 , 3.69 ) 
      -gray ( 86.69 , 7.20 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.688965 [log = -3.177443 ]- 98.991348 [log = -2.251341 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 54 with 121 vertices (convex hull=140).
785 of 6475 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 22 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 143 edges
                 cluster 1 has 23 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:054:  FITNESS:   -73.08
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 240)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 84)
              BEST PATCH #: 199 (out of 466 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 54, we have euler=-104 (156274,463907,307529) : difference with theory (-99) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 55
Computing statistics for defect 55 [ (106,147,99) - 94.790 ]
      -white ( 98.86 , 3.89 ) 
      -gray ( 89.25 , 3.44 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.254906 [log = -2.149120 ]- 98.862579 [log = -2.252054 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 55 with 164 vertices (convex hull=190).
959 of 12407 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 27 by 23 by 27 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 6 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 79 edges
                 cluster 1 has 61 edges
                 cluster 2 has 33 edges
                 cluster 3 has 12 edges
                 cluster 4 has 11 edges
                 cluster 5 has 11 edges
PATCH #:055:  FITNESS:   -68.73
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 239)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 246)
              BEST PATCH #: 196 (out of 465 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 55, we have euler=-102 (156345,464213,307766) : difference with theory (-98) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 56
Computing statistics for defect 56 [ (106,133,102) - 81.123 ]
      -white ( 91.56 , 12.99 ) 
      -gray ( 85.24 , 7.04 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (85.237206 [log = -2.790279 ]- 91.558029 [log = -3.969848 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 56 with 70 vertices (convex hull=86).
255 of 2160 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 15 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 53 edges
                 cluster 1 has 27 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:056:  FITNESS:   -101.12
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 214)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 126)
              BEST PATCH #: 157 (out of 416 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 56, we have euler=-101 (156376,464342,307865) : difference with theory (-97) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 57
Computing statistics for defect 57 [ (72,134,110) - 94.007 ]
      -white ( 99.68 , 4.64 ) 
      -gray ( 83.43 , 13.66 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (83.429451 [log = -3.917531 ]- 99.684578 [log = -2.487000 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 57 with 774 vertices (convex hull=877).
41349 of 257802 overlapping edges discarded
tessellating patch....
done
After retessellation of defect 57, we have euler=-100 (156696,465778,308982) : difference with theory (-96) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 58
Computing statistics for defect 58 [ (113,137,103) - 87.589 ]
      -white ( 91.39 , 11.37 ) 
      -gray ( 84.12 , 10.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (84.123146 [log = -3.572954 ]- 91.393959 [log = -4.030406 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 58 with 142 vertices (convex hull=195).
1041 of 8970 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 27 by 22 by 25 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 8 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 78 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 15 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
                 cluster 5 has 7 edges
                 cluster 6 has 7 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
normal vector of length zero at vertex 161716 with 3 faces
PATCH #:058:  FITNESS:   -104.67
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 255)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 134)
              BEST PATCH #: 234 (out of 497 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 58, we have euler=-99 (156741,466003,309163) : difference with theory (-95) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 59
Computing statistics for defect 59 [ (99,86,104) - 94.788 ]
      -white ( 100.35 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 88.46 , 4.97 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.462914 [log = -2.494789 ]- 100.346458 [log = -2.064558 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 59 with 177 vertices (convex hull=225).
2004 of 13572 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 26 by 19 by 33 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 104 edges
                 cluster 1 has 26 edges
                 cluster 2 has 22 edges
                 cluster 3 has 19 edges
                 cluster 4 has 17 edges
                 cluster 5 has 12 edges
                 cluster 6 has 6 edges
                 cluster 7 has 6 edges
                 cluster 8 has 5 edges
                 cluster 9 has 5 edges
PATCH #:059:  FITNESS:   -65.05
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 188)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 167)
              BEST PATCH #: 95 (out of 366 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 59, we have euler=-98 (156809,466316,309409) : difference with theory (-94) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 60
Computing statistics for defect 60 [ (66,122,109) - 93.523 ]
      -white ( 101.27 , 5.90 ) 
      -gray ( 80.71 , 15.11 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (80.712715 [log = -3.721603 ]- 101.274956 [log = -2.614846 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 60 with 255 vertices (convex hull=274).
4147 of 28238 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 28 by 34 by 25 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 7 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 147 edges
                 cluster 1 has 139 edges
                 cluster 2 has 18 edges
                 cluster 3 has 14 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
                 cluster 5 has 9 edges
                 cluster 6 has 7 edges
PATCH #:060:  FITNESS:   -89.08
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 205)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 288)
              BEST PATCH #: 130 (out of 399 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 60, we have euler=-97 (156915,466785,309773) : difference with theory (-93) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 61
Computing statistics for defect 61 [ (93,94,103) - 95.408 ]
      -white ( 99.24 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.79 , 2.88 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.785789 [log = -1.978784 ]- 99.240494 [log = -2.100680 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 61 with 34 vertices (convex hull=61).
32 of 529 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 11 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 27 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:061:  FITNESS:   -64.29
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 131)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 19)
              BEST PATCH #: 83 (out of 261 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 61, we have euler=-96 (156923,466832,309813) : difference with theory (-92) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 62
Computing statistics for defect 62 [ (74,161,102) - 96.517 ]
      -white ( 98.11 , 3.24 ) 
      -gray ( 89.68 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.683289 [log = -1.950498 ]- 98.110069 [log = -2.152996 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 62 with 13 vertices (convex hull=26).
6 of 72 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 7 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 4 edges
PATCH #:062:  FITNESS:   -67.48
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 161)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 12)
              BEST PATCH #: 145 (out of 315 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 62, we have euler=-95 (156924,466844,309825) : difference with theory (-91) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 63
Computing statistics for defect 63 [ (86,162,107) - 93.126 ]
      -white ( 98.55 , 3.11 ) 
      -gray ( 90.56 , 4.03 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.558998 [log = -2.151218 ]- 98.554001 [log = -2.086174 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 63 with 83 vertices (convex hull=93).
152 of 3251 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 16 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 82 edges
                 cluster 1 has 20 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
PATCH #:063:  FITNESS:   -66.18
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 160)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 69)
              BEST PATCH #: 51 (out of 314 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 63, we have euler=-94 (156960,466999,309945) : difference with theory (-90) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 64
Computing statistics for defect 64 [ (102,77,107) - 92.596 ]
      -white ( 99.91 , 2.85 ) 
      -gray ( 86.05 , 7.01 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.053741 [log = -3.416265 ]- 99.906876 [log = -1.957855 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 64 with 26 vertices (convex hull=52).
9 of 316 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 10 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
PATCH #:064:  FITNESS:   -74.94
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 168)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 152)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 17)
              BEST PATCH #: 144 (out of 330 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 64, we have euler=-93 (156965,467032,309974) : difference with theory (-89) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 65
Computing statistics for defect 65 [ (70,97,109) - 91.856 ]
      -white ( 98.79 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 91.49 , 3.83 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.485161 [log = -1.964139 ]- 98.787392 [log = -2.158172 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 65 with 15 vertices (convex hull=21).
3 of 102 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 8 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 19 edges
PATCH #:065:  FITNESS:   -61.24
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 267)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 40)
              BEST PATCH #: 343 (out of 517 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 65, we have euler=-92 (156970,467055,309993) : difference with theory (-88) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 66
Computing statistics for defect 66 [ (122,89,108) - 93.594 ]
      -white ( 98.80 , 3.09 ) 
      -gray ( 89.58 , 4.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.584206 [log = -2.273928 ]- 98.796608 [log = -2.073668 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 66 with 31 vertices (convex hull=57).
10 of 455 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:066:  FITNESS:   -66.21
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 140)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 33)
              BEST PATCH #: 94 (out of 278 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 66, we have euler=-91 (156977,467097,310029) : difference with theory (-87) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 67
Computing statistics for defect 67 [ (68,155,108) - 92.349 ]
      -white ( 95.38 , 2.91 ) 
      -gray ( 86.31 , 6.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.311302 [log = -2.541659 ]- 95.383812 [log = -1.922479 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 67 with 19 vertices (convex hull=37).
36 of 135 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 9 edges
PATCH #:067:  FITNESS:   -69.36
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 329)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 16)
              BEST PATCH #: 465 (out of 635 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 67, we have euler=-90 (156979,467117,310048) : difference with theory (-86) = 4 


CORRECTING DEFECT 68
Computing statistics for defect 68 [ (71,158,109) - 93.889 ]
      -white ( 98.58 , 3.34 ) 
      -gray ( 89.50 , 2.80 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.499275 [log = -1.977499 ]- 98.583244 [log = -2.127375 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 68 with 56 vertices (convex hull=59).
89 of 1451 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 39 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:068:  FITNESS:   -66.01
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 248)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 71)
              BEST PATCH #: 213 (out of 482 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 68, we have euler=-90 (157003,467221,310128) : difference with theory (-85) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 69
Computing statistics for defect 69 [ (94,140,109) - 83.526 ]
      -white ( 94.96 , 9.21 ) 
      -gray ( 79.26 , 9.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (79.261086 [log = -3.971672 ]- 94.961342 [log = -3.638211 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 69 with 37 vertices (convex hull=60).
82 of 584 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 18 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:069:  FITNESS:   -101.65
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 302)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 402 (out of 584 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 69, we have euler=-89 (157012,467273,310172) : difference with theory (-84) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 70
Computing statistics for defect 70 [ (75,154,110) - 93.590 ]
      -white ( 99.46 , 3.69 ) 
      -gray ( 89.21 , 2.75 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.214272 [log = -1.944284 ]- 99.462547 [log = -2.307132 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 70 with 59 vertices (convex hull=97).
98 of 1613 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 14 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 54 edges
                 cluster 1 has 20 edges
PATCH #:070:  FITNESS:   -63.66
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 339)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 304)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  8 (out of 36)
              BEST PATCH #: 471 (out of 653 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 70, we have euler=-88 (157023,467344,310233) : difference with theory (-83) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 71
Computing statistics for defect 71 [ (89,158,114) - 95.130 ]
      -white ( 99.36 , 3.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.33 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.329170 [log = -1.985069 ]- 99.364311 [log = -2.132989 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 71 with 168 vertices (convex hull=197).
1202 of 12826 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 27 by 26 by 22 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 146 edges
                 cluster 1 has 89 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
PATCH #:071:  FITNESS:   -64.82
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 151)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 188)
              BEST PATCH #: 32 (out of 297 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 71, we have euler=-87 (157100,467663,310476) : difference with theory (-82) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 72
Computing statistics for defect 72 [ (71,149,113) - 92.590 ]
      -white ( 98.86 , 4.08 ) 
      -gray ( 89.46 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.462585 [log = -1.998150 ]- 98.863480 [log = -2.429127 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 72 with 76 vertices (convex hull=116).
303 of 2547 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 16 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 67 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:072:  FITNESS:   -64.69
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 151)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 44)
              BEST PATCH #: 38 (out of 297 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 72, we have euler=-86 (157124,467786,310576) : difference with theory (-81) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 73
Computing statistics for defect 73 [ (68,156,113) - 94.296 ]
      -white ( 95.26 , 3.01 ) 
      -gray ( 86.37 , 6.19 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.367744 [log = -2.570250 ]- 95.255234 [log = -1.922415 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 73 with 23 vertices (convex hull=45).
29 of 224 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 8 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 6 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
PATCH #:073:  FITNESS:   -69.76
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 153)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 26)
              BEST PATCH #: 129 (out of 299 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 73, we have euler=-85 (157127,467812,310600) : difference with theory (-80) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 74
Computing statistics for defect 74 [ (76,103,117) - 95.198 ]
      -white ( 100.35 , 4.04 ) 
      -gray ( 91.30 , 2.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.299614 [log = -1.893075 ]- 100.353577 [log = -2.470153 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 74 with 52 vertices (convex hull=64).
14 of 1312 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 59 edges
                 cluster 1 has 5 edges
PATCH #:074:  FITNESS:   -64.09
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 322)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  9 (out of 35)
              BEST PATCH #: 442 (out of 620 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 74, we have euler=-84 (157139,467876,310653) : difference with theory (-79) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 75
Computing statistics for defect 75 [ (105,147,122) - 92.640 ]
      -white ( 96.07 , 8.08 ) 
      -gray ( 84.00 , 7.33 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (84.002785 [log = -2.799557 ]- 96.065773 [log = -2.853534 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 75 with 228 vertices (convex hull=251).
950 of 24928 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 42 by 27 by 32 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 383 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 1 edges
PATCH #:075:  FITNESS:   -82.51
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 152)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 435)
              BEST PATCH #: 29 (out of 298 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 75, we have euler=-83 (157245,468315,310987) : difference with theory (-78) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 76
Computing statistics for defect 76 [ (123,76,117) - 90.008 ]
      -white ( 97.57 , 3.24 ) 
      -gray ( 87.64 , 5.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.643532 [log = -2.960602 ]- 97.568138 [log = -2.062416 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 76 with 40 vertices (convex hull=61).
43 of 737 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 11 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 53 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:076:  FITNESS:   -71.58
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 388)
              CROSSOVERS: 8 (out of 352)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  8 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 570 (out of 750 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 76, we have euler=-82 (157253,468361,311026) : difference with theory (-77) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 77
Computing statistics for defect 77 [ (114,146,117) - 100.698 ]
      -white ( 102.09 , 6.47 ) 
      -gray ( 90.71 , 14.21 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.705444 [log = -4.729927 ]- 102.085831 [log = -2.985524 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 77 with 30 vertices (convex hull=46).
4 of 431 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 10 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 36 edges
PATCH #:077:  FITNESS:   -94.55
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 223)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 20)
              BEST PATCH #: 251 (out of 433 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 77, we have euler=-81 (157262,468407,311064) : difference with theory (-76) = 5 


CORRECTING DEFECT 78
Computing statistics for defect 78 [ (67,144,126) - 92.869 ]
      -white ( 98.23 , 3.46 ) 
      -gray ( 87.68 , 6.45 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.680199 [log = -2.341244 ]- 98.230339 [log = -2.179110 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 78 with 357 vertices (convex hull=354).
7706 of 55840 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 24 by 39 by 41 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 10 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 128 edges
                 cluster 1 has 105 edges
                 cluster 2 has 61 edges
                 cluster 3 has 37 edges
                 cluster 4 has 30 edges
                 cluster 5 has 23 edges
                 cluster 6 has 22 edges
                 cluster 7 has 17 edges
                 cluster 8 has 11 edges
                 cluster 9 has 6 edges
PATCH #:078:  FITNESS:   -74.59
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 32)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 24)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 559)
              BEST PATCH #: 8 (out of 61 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 78, we have euler=-81 (157420,469092,311591) : difference with theory (-75) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 79
Computing statistics for defect 79 [ (86,117,118) - 92.405 ]
      -white ( 97.71 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 88.92 , 3.10 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.916969 [log = -2.093253 ]- 97.708679 [log = -2.129911 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 79 with 43 vertices (convex hull=69).
37 of 866 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 25 edges
                 cluster 1 has 7 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:079:  FITNESS:   -64.80
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 264)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 30)
              BEST PATCH #: 330 (out of 514 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 79, we have euler=-80 (157429,469149,311640) : difference with theory (-74) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 80
Computing statistics for defect 80 [ (89,125,119) - 93.737 ]
      -white ( 97.16 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.25 , 2.72 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.248123 [log = -1.902763 ]- 97.159363 [log = -2.012525 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 80 with 72 vertices (convex hull=102).
155 of 2401 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 91 edges
                 cluster 1 has 4 edges
PATCH #:080:  FITNESS:   -63.55
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 330)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 70)
              BEST PATCH #: 371 (out of 636 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 80, we have euler=-79 (157448,469253,311726) : difference with theory (-73) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 81
Computing statistics for defect 81 [ (80,118,122) - 95.185 ]
      -white ( 98.83 , 3.76 ) 
      -gray ( 89.57 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.573730 [log = -2.062977 ]- 98.825035 [log = -2.196825 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 81 with 43 vertices (convex hull=71).
87 of 816 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 16 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:081:  FITNESS:   -63.83
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 252)
              CROSSOVERS: 9 (out of 232)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 50)
              BEST PATCH #: 318 (out of 494 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 81, we have euler=-78 (157457,469310,311775) : difference with theory (-72) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 82
Computing statistics for defect 82 [ (98,132,126) - 94.813 ]
      -white ( 98.04 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 92.09 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (92.090813 [log = -2.011618 ]- 98.038109 [log = -2.022168 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 82 with 81 vertices (convex hull=99).
218 of 3022 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 24 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 73 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:082:  FITNESS:   -66.45
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 204)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 125)
              BEST PATCH #: 143 (out of 398 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 82, we have euler=-77 (157485,469446,311884) : difference with theory (-71) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 83
Computing statistics for defect 83 [ (120,78,126) - 93.251 ]
      -white ( 98.17 , 3.48 ) 
      -gray ( 87.44 , 6.34 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.437622 [log = -2.790338 ]- 98.165779 [log = -2.122153 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 83 with 68 vertices (convex hull=86).
41 of 2237 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 14 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 55 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
                 cluster 3 has 5 edges
PATCH #:083:  FITNESS:   -70.15
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 320)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  10 (out of 62)
              BEST PATCH #: 359 (out of 618 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 83, we have euler=-76 (157502,469535,311957) : difference with theory (-70) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 84
Computing statistics for defect 84 [ (99,128,127) - 94.658 ]
      -white ( 98.48 , 3.30 ) 
      -gray ( 92.34 , 2.83 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (92.343681 [log = -2.000044 ]- 98.480637 [log = -2.146273 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 84 with 40 vertices (convex hull=62).
49 of 731 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 10 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 30 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
PATCH #:084:  FITNESS:   -68.25
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 125)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 112)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 26)
              BEST PATCH #: 65 (out of 247 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 84, we have euler=-75 (157512,469592,312005) : difference with theory (-69) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 85
Computing statistics for defect 85 [ (79,131,129) - 94.344 ]
      -white ( 99.11 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 89.47 , 2.82 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.467484 [log = -1.965898 ]- 99.107735 [log = -2.001566 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 85 with 46 vertices (convex hull=65).
18 of 1017 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 13 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 42 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:085:  FITNESS:   -62.09
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 346)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 312)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  7 (out of 36)
              BEST PATCH #: 496 (out of 668 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 85, we have euler=-74 (157521,469648,312053) : difference with theory (-68) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 86
Computing statistics for defect 86 [ (129,147,129) - 112.313 ]
      -white ( 99.03 , 32.93 ) 
      -gray ( 76.68 , 35.97 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (76.676514 [log = -3.342438 ]- 99.033913 [log = -3.524669 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 86 with 17 vertices (convex hull=26).
0 of 136 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 17 edges
PATCH #:086:  FITNESS:   -108.66
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 222)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 250 (out of 432 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 86, we have euler=-73 (157526,469672,312073) : difference with theory (-67) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 87
Computing statistics for defect 87 [ (125,144,130) - 69.378 ]
      -white ( 90.17 , 13.03 ) 
      -gray ( 65.70 , 10.27 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (65.703835 [log = -3.643275 ]- 90.165512 [log = -3.429759 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 87 with 36 vertices (convex hull=57).
47 of 583 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 13 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 47 edges
PATCH #:087:  FITNESS:   -103.61
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 204)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 18)
              BEST PATCH #: 135 (out of 398 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 87, we have euler=-72 (157538,469729,312119) : difference with theory (-66) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 88
Computing statistics for defect 88 [ (118,154,133) - 77.339 ]
      -white ( 85.09 , 8.25 ) 
      -gray ( 82.61 , 8.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (82.607033 [log = -2.902896 ]- 85.089569 [log = -3.257582 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 88 with 58 vertices (convex hull=78).
130 of 1523 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 27 by 15 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 55 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 1 edges
PATCH #:088:  FITNESS:   -95.64
              MUTATIONS: 8 (out of 525)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 472)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  14 (out of 136)
              BEST PATCH #: 833 (out of 1007 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 88, we have euler=-71 (157547,469788,312170) : difference with theory (-65) = 6 


CORRECTING DEFECT 89
Computing statistics for defect 89 [ (104,145,133) - 94.333 ]
      -white ( 97.32 , 2.97 ) 
      -gray ( 89.30 , 4.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.302490 [log = -2.572410 ]- 97.318687 [log = -2.065179 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 89 with 52 vertices (convex hull=71).
64 of 1262 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 13 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 50 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
PATCH #:089:  FITNESS:   -68.30
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 302)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 40)
              BEST PATCH #: 325 (out of 584 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 89, we have euler=-71 (157562,469865,312232) : difference with theory (-64) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 90
Computing statistics for defect 90 [ (81,164,134) - 92.245 ]
      -white ( 96.68 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 86.72 , 3.44 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.716316 [log = -2.024907 ]- 96.677193 [log = -2.043704 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 90 with 87 vertices (convex hull=133).
774 of 2967 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 19 by 24 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 50 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:090:  FITNESS:   -71.69
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 249)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 139)
              BEST PATCH #: 216 (out of 483 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 90, we have euler=-70 (157582,469985,312333) : difference with theory (-63) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 91
Computing statistics for defect 91 [ (109,138,133) - 94.924 ]
      -white ( 99.36 , 4.48 ) 
      -gray ( 88.34 , 6.84 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.342819 [log = -2.589083 ]- 99.363953 [log = -2.274825 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 91 with 16 vertices (convex hull=22).
14 of 106 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 7 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 14 edges
PATCH #:091:  FITNESS:   -74.19
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 401)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 360)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 20)
              BEST PATCH #: 597 (out of 771 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 91, we have euler=-69 (157586,470009,312354) : difference with theory (-62) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 92
Computing statistics for defect 92 [ (77,140,137) - 92.750 ]
      -white ( 98.11 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 89.01 , 2.73 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.005386 [log = -1.944690 ]- 98.110786 [log = -2.104581 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 92 with 132 vertices (convex hull=170).
988 of 7658 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 25 by 27 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 66 edges
                 cluster 1 has 32 edges
                 cluster 2 has 21 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 6 edges
PATCH #:092:  FITNESS:   -65.72
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 174)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 217)
              BEST PATCH #: 81 (out of 344 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 92, we have euler=-68 (157635,470239,312536) : difference with theory (-61) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 93
Computing statistics for defect 93 [ (108,156,136) - 94.550 ]
      -white ( 92.16 , 5.17 ) 
      -gray ( 86.06 , 4.73 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.058701 [log = -2.243540 ]- 92.161385 [log = -2.322850 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 93 with 17 vertices (convex hull=33).
0 of 136 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 11 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 15 edges
PATCH #:093:  FITNESS:   -83.05
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 243)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 39)
              BEST PATCH #: 283 (out of 469 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 93, we have euler=-67 (157640,470263,312556) : difference with theory (-60) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 94
Computing statistics for defect 94 [ (125,78,135) - 93.489 ]
      -white ( 97.71 , 3.23 ) 
      -gray ( 89.34 , 4.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.343933 [log = -2.592453 ]- 97.713356 [log = -2.005504 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 94 with 26 vertices (convex hull=42).
2 of 323 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 13 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 9 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:094:  FITNESS:   -69.73
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 238)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 20)
              BEST PATCH #: 286 (out of 464 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 94, we have euler=-66 (157648,470302,312588) : difference with theory (-59) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 95
Computing statistics for defect 95 [ (84,139,144) - 93.271 ]
      -white ( 97.47 , 3.02 ) 
      -gray ( 88.57 , 2.76 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.565590 [log = -1.941430 ]- 97.465248 [log = -2.045970 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 95 with 243 vertices (convex hull=226).
1891 of 27512 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 26 by 37 by 35 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (5 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 171 edges
                 cluster 1 has 113 edges
                 cluster 2 has 44 edges
                 cluster 3 has 11 edges
                 cluster 4 has 5 edges
PATCH #:095:  FITNESS:   -75.52
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 304)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 272)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  45 (out of 629)
              BEST PATCH #: 317 (out of 586 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 95, we have euler=-65 (157734,470673,312874) : difference with theory (-58) = 7 


CORRECTING DEFECT 96
Computing statistics for defect 96 [ (103,160,151) - 92.778 ]
      -white ( 96.85 , 5.65 ) 
      -gray ( 88.96 , 5.32 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.963577 [log = -2.357591 ]- 96.847839 [log = -2.390271 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 96 with 1282 vertices (convex hull=933).
49565 of 771556 overlapping edges discarded
tessellating patch....
done
After retessellation of defect 96, we have euler=-60 (158496,473501,314945) : difference with theory (-57) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 97
Computing statistics for defect 97 [ (99,138,137) - 93.771 ]
      -white ( 97.41 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 91.70 , 2.58 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.698547 [log = -1.878476 ]- 97.409767 [log = -2.019737 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 97 with 55 vertices (convex hull=73).
39 of 1446 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 16 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 65 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
PATCH #:097:  FITNESS:   -61.49
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 329)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 102)
              BEST PATCH #: 366 (out of 635 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 97, we have euler=-59 (158514,473583,315010) : difference with theory (-56) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 98
Computing statistics for defect 98 [ (95,85,137) - 94.967 ]
      -white ( 98.31 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 88.04 , 5.64 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.044556 [log = -3.007918 ]- 98.308594 [log = -1.896628 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 98 with 49 vertices (convex hull=69).
25 of 1151 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 11 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 40 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:098:  FITNESS:   -79.07
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 152)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 86)
              BEST PATCH #: 37 (out of 298 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 98, we have euler=-58 (158533,473668,315077) : difference with theory (-55) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 99
Computing statistics for defect 99 [ (70,117,138) - 94.233 ]
      -white ( 97.34 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 88.06 , 9.91 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.061485 [log = -3.141157 ]- 97.340683 [log = -1.967046 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 99 with 68 vertices (convex hull=96).
163 of 2115 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 15 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 90 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
PATCH #:099:  FITNESS:   -71.80
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 293)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 264)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  4 (out of 54)
              BEST PATCH #: 310 (out of 567 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 99, we have euler=-57 (158555,473773,315161) : difference with theory (-54) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 100
Computing statistics for defect 100 [ (125,137,140) - 92.870 ]
      -white ( 99.57 , 35.10 ) 
      -gray ( 89.62 , 5.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.619469 [log = -2.263918 ]- 99.571762 [log = -3.531323 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 100 with 12 vertices (convex hull=22).
4 of 62 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 7 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 2 edges
PATCH #:100:  FITNESS:   -80.20
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 117)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 14)
              BEST PATCH #: 61 (out of 231 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 100, we have euler=-56 (158556,473787,315175) : difference with theory (-53) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 101
Computing statistics for defect 101 [ (99,145,143) - 95.393 ]
      -white ( 98.36 , 2.66 ) 
      -gray ( 91.49 , 2.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.493118 [log = -1.928775 ]- 98.362305 [log = -1.892323 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 101 with 110 vertices (convex hull=135).
162 of 5833 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 19 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 159 edges
                 cluster 1 has 8 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:101:  FITNESS:   -60.31
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 143)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 92)
              BEST PATCH #: 14 (out of 281 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 101, we have euler=-55 (158606,473995,315334) : difference with theory (-52) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 102
Computing statistics for defect 102 [ (124,146,141) - 55.420 ]
      -white ( 90.31 , 34.63 ) 
      -gray ( 75.82 , 40.19 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (75.816467 [log = -3.985511 ]- 90.313446 [log = -3.084167 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 102 with 11 vertices (convex hull=23).
0 of 55 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 8 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
PATCH #:102:  FITNESS:   -101.27
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 248)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 10)
              BEST PATCH #: 304 (out of 482 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 102, we have euler=-54 (158608,474007,315345) : difference with theory (-51) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 103
Computing statistics for defect 103 [ (85,169,141) - 89.409 ]
      -white ( 97.27 , 3.53 ) 
      -gray ( 88.86 , 3.10 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.862801 [log = -2.001130 ]- 97.274925 [log = -2.133381 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 103 with 28 vertices (convex hull=42).
2 of 376 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 9 by 17 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 34 edges
PATCH #:103:  FITNESS:   -66.11
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 214)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 109)
              BEST PATCH #: 240 (out of 416 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 103, we have euler=-53 (158618,474051,315380) : difference with theory (-50) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 104
Computing statistics for defect 104 [ (81,124,144) - 93.665 ]
      -white ( 98.61 , 3.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.09 , 2.83 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.089317 [log = -1.956370 ]- 98.614037 [log = -2.091025 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 104 with 91 vertices (convex hull=110).
128 of 3967 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 20 by 21 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 126 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
PATCH #:104:  FITNESS:   -64.03
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 331)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  10 (out of 112)
              BEST PATCH #: 380 (out of 637 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 104, we have euler=-52 (158648,474190,315490) : difference with theory (-49) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 105
Computing statistics for defect 105 [ (73,124,143) - 96.818 ]
      -white ( 99.07 , 2.90 ) 
      -gray ( 91.12 , 2.54 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.115448 [log = -1.867011 ]- 99.071869 [log = -2.025177 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 105 with 26 vertices (convex hull=42).
5 of 320 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 11 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 20 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:105:  FITNESS:   -60.97
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 176)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 164 (out of 346 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 105, we have euler=-51 (158656,474229,315522) : difference with theory (-48) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 106
Computing statistics for defect 106 [ (73,118,144) - 94.502 ]
      -white ( 98.97 , 3.33 ) 
      -gray ( 91.42 , 2.75 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.423714 [log = -1.957624 ]- 98.967537 [log = -2.164331 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 106 with 37 vertices (convex hull=55).
39 of 627 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 11 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 40 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:106:  FITNESS:   -63.10
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 222)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 246 (out of 432 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 106, we have euler=-50 (158666,474283,315567) : difference with theory (-47) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 107
Computing statistics for defect 107 [ (121,144,143) - 85.496 ]
      -white ( 88.47 , 6.79 ) 
      -gray ( 85.64 , 5.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (85.637024 [log = -2.149802 ]- 88.474731 [log = -2.891233 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 107 with 13 vertices (convex hull=27).
4 of 74 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 8 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
PATCH #:107:  FITNESS:   -82.13
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 249)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 54)
              BEST PATCH #: 299 (out of 483 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 107, we have euler=-49 (158669,474299,315581) : difference with theory (-46) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 108
Computing statistics for defect 108 [ (103,85,146) - 93.308 ]
      -white ( 99.10 , 3.91 ) 
      -gray ( 90.02 , 4.71 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.019089 [log = -2.350179 ]- 99.097160 [log = -2.384213 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 108 with 36 vertices (convex hull=55).
30 of 600 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 13 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 12 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:108:  FITNESS:   -66.70
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 220)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 34)
              BEST PATCH #: 256 (out of 430 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 108, we have euler=-48 (158680,474353,315625) : difference with theory (-45) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 109
Computing statistics for defect 109 [ (108,85,147) - 94.579 ]
      -white ( 99.20 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 91.40 , 3.40 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.395912 [log = -2.140880 ]- 99.200195 [log = -2.180350 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 109 with 45 vertices (convex hull=73).
26 of 964 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 15 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 27 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
PATCH #:109:  FITNESS:   -65.73
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 278)
              CROSSOVERS: 10 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 30)
              BEST PATCH #: 366 (out of 544 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 109, we have euler=-47 (158691,474414,315676) : difference with theory (-44) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 110
Computing statistics for defect 110 [ (100,131,146) - 95.606 ]
      -white ( 96.60 , 2.85 ) 
      -gray ( 91.20 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.202744 [log = -2.006468 ]- 96.603737 [log = -1.982836 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 110 with 26 vertices (convex hull=37).
1 of 324 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 13 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 21 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
PATCH #:110:  FITNESS:   -61.59
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 364)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 328)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 26)
              BEST PATCH #: 518 (out of 702 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 110, we have euler=-46 (158700,474456,315710) : difference with theory (-43) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 111
Computing statistics for defect 111 [ (101,137,147) - 95.933 ]
      -white ( 98.41 , 2.95 ) 
      -gray ( 92.04 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (92.035019 [log = -2.119355 ]- 98.409523 [log = -1.998957 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 111 with 56 vertices (convex hull=77).
143 of 1397 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 31 edges
                 cluster 1 has 11 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:111:  FITNESS:   -68.06
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 322)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 51)
              BEST PATCH #: 355 (out of 620 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 111, we have euler=-45 (158713,474531,315773) : difference with theory (-42) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 112
Computing statistics for defect 112 [ (80,148,149) - 94.240 ]
      -white ( 98.64 , 3.03 ) 
      -gray ( 90.07 , 2.68 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.070702 [log = -1.884793 ]- 98.643990 [log = -1.999315 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 112 with 36 vertices (convex hull=51).
5 of 625 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 14 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 54 edges
PATCH #:112:  FITNESS:   -60.92
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 242)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 197 (out of 468 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 112, we have euler=-44 (158726,474590,315820) : difference with theory (-41) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 113
Computing statistics for defect 113 [ (80,153,150) - 95.303 ]
      -white ( 99.44 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 89.56 , 2.87 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.555359 [log = -1.980400 ]- 99.439484 [log = -1.993925 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 113 with 36 vertices (convex hull=73).
51 of 579 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 13 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 10 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:113:  FITNESS:   -61.40
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 90)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 80)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 23)
              BEST PATCH #: 3 (out of 180 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 113, we have euler=-43 (158732,474635,315860) : difference with theory (-40) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 114
Computing statistics for defect 114 [ (127,145,155) - 92.519 ]
      -white ( 96.24 , 3.83 ) 
      -gray ( 86.64 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.637146 [log = -2.068331 ]- 96.239883 [log = -2.182650 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 114 with 153 vertices (convex hull=208).
1001 of 10627 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 31 by 28 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 156 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:114:  FITNESS:   -67.65
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 193)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 255)
              BEST PATCH #: 116 (out of 379 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 114, we have euler=-42 (158788,474898,316068) : difference with theory (-39) = 3 


CORRECTING DEFECT 115
Computing statistics for defect 115 [ (102,132,153) - 94.687 ]
      -white ( 97.49 , 2.94 ) 
      -gray ( 90.71 , 3.34 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.711937 [log = -2.211426 ]- 97.487816 [log = -2.063099 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 115 with 75 vertices (convex hull=105).
409 of 2366 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 17 by 18 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 52 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:115:  FITNESS:   -67.03
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 252)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 224)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 64)
              BEST PATCH #: 215 (out of 486 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 115, we have euler=-40 (158812,475018,316166) : difference with theory (-38) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 116
Computing statistics for defect 116 [ (97,89,157) - 94.499 ]
      -white ( 99.31 , 3.69 ) 
      -gray ( 88.78 , 4.66 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.783249 [log = -2.403350 ]- 99.309502 [log = -2.309326 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 116 with 120 vertices (convex hull=150).
685 of 6455 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 26 by 20 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 6 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 85 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
                 cluster 2 has 14 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
                 cluster 5 has 8 edges
PATCH #:116:  FITNESS:   -67.31
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 402)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 360)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  22 (out of 101)
              BEST PATCH #: 505 (out of 772 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 116, we have euler=-39 (158837,475164,316288) : difference with theory (-37) = 2 


CORRECTING DEFECT 117
Computing statistics for defect 117 [ (101,148,164) - 90.037 ]
      -white ( 99.40 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 89.95 , 3.05 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.946274 [log = -2.018763 ]- 99.398682 [log = -2.100756 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 117 with 414 vertices (convex hull=353).
5166 of 80325 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 54 by 40 by 44 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 8 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 387 edges
                 cluster 1 has 208 edges
                 cluster 2 has 25 edges
                 cluster 3 has 14 edges
                 cluster 4 has 14 edges
                 cluster 5 has 13 edges
                 cluster 6 has 5 edges
                 cluster 7 has 5 edges
PATCH #:117:  FITNESS:   -68.92
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 74)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 57)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  110 (out of 1171)
              BEST PATCH #: 85 (out of 136 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 117, we have euler=-37 (158953,475706,316716) : difference with theory (-36) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 118
Computing statistics for defect 118 [ (92,138,157) - 97.225 ]
      -white ( 99.91 , 2.71 ) 
      -gray ( 91.42 , 2.52 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.417168 [log = -1.865352 ]- 99.905876 [log = -1.927944 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 118 with 28 vertices (convex hull=46).
22 of 356 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 9 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 17 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
PATCH #:118:  FITNESS:   -59.17
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 192)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 43)
              BEST PATCH #: 196 (out of 378 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 118, we have euler=-36 (158961,475747,316750) : difference with theory (-35) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 119
Computing statistics for defect 119 [ (90,99,159) - 94.812 ]
      -white ( 98.81 , 3.33 ) 
      -gray ( 90.89 , 4.10 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.891830 [log = -2.113390 ]- 98.811134 [log = -2.142853 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 119 with 47 vertices (convex hull=80).
79 of 1002 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 16 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:119:  FITNESS:   -62.56
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 220)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 30)
              BEST PATCH #: 254 (out of 430 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 119, we have euler=-35 (158973,475814,316806) : difference with theory (-34) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 120
Computing statistics for defect 120 [ (119,77,159) - 93.664 ]
      -white ( 97.91 , 3.71 ) 
      -gray ( 87.07 , 6.52 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.074455 [log = -3.137813 ]- 97.905655 [log = -2.181558 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 120 with 51 vertices (convex hull=83).
91 of 1184 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 12 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 58 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:120:  FITNESS:   -76.40
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 338)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 304)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 30)
              BEST PATCH #: 474 (out of 652 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 120, we have euler=-34 (158984,475879,316861) : difference with theory (-33) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 121
Computing statistics for defect 121 [ (75,123,159) - 94.630 ]
      -white ( 98.73 , 2.82 ) 
      -gray ( 91.63 , 3.25 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.631561 [log = -2.051729 ]- 98.729843 [log = -1.939733 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 121 with 17 vertices (convex hull=26).
4 of 132 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 8 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 11 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
PATCH #:121:  FITNESS:   -65.19
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 98)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 88)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 27)
              BEST PATCH #: 12 (out of 196 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 121, we have euler=-33 (158990,475905,316882) : difference with theory (-32) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 122
Computing statistics for defect 122 [ (114,149,162) - 92.919 ]
      -white ( 97.29 , 3.18 ) 
      -gray ( 89.23 , 2.71 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.228142 [log = -1.929810 ]- 97.287361 [log = -2.080300 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 122 with 14 vertices (convex hull=25).
6 of 85 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 10 by 8 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
PATCH #:122:  FITNESS:   -59.84
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 241)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 41)
              BEST PATCH #: 281 (out of 467 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 122, we have euler=-32 (158993,475922,316897) : difference with theory (-31) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 123
Computing statistics for defect 123 [ (99,146,164) - 94.754 ]
      -white ( 98.32 , 3.51 ) 
      -gray ( 90.37 , 3.22 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.374550 [log = -2.096607 ]- 98.320992 [log = -2.175072 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 123 with 11 vertices (convex hull=24).
4 of 51 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 8 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 9 edges
PATCH #:123:  FITNESS:   -65.83
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 176)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 15)
              BEST PATCH #: 164 (out of 346 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 123, we have euler=-31 (158995,475935,316909) : difference with theory (-30) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 124
Computing statistics for defect 124 [ (122,114,165) - 93.376 ]
      -white ( 96.00 , 2.79 ) 
      -gray ( 87.79 , 3.17 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.790787 [log = -1.987838 ]- 95.998352 [log = -1.937421 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 124 with 10 vertices (convex hull=15).
4 of 41 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 7 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 2 edges
PATCH #:124:  FITNESS:   -66.43
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 116)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 6)
              BEST PATCH #: 58 (out of 230 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 124, we have euler=-30 (158996,475945,316919) : difference with theory (-29) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 125
Computing statistics for defect 125 [ (97,94,169) - 93.965 ]
      -white ( 98.98 , 3.90 ) 
      -gray ( 90.05 , 4.74 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.051453 [log = -2.122187 ]- 98.983780 [log = -2.318165 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 125 with 107 vertices (convex hull=137).
552 of 5119 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 19 by 18 by 20 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 119 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
                 cluster 3 has 7 edges
PATCH #:125:  FITNESS:   -65.40
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 177)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 160)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 70)
              BEST PATCH #: 78 (out of 347 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 125, we have euler=-29 (159037,476133,317067) : difference with theory (-28) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 126
Computing statistics for defect 126 [ (124,98,167) - 92.308 ]
      -white ( 97.67 , 3.30 ) 
      -gray ( 88.35 , 2.85 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.351059 [log = -1.968602 ]- 97.669403 [log = -2.109273 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 126 with 43 vertices (convex hull=60).
36 of 867 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 60 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
PATCH #:126:  FITNESS:   -63.57
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 239)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 27)
              BEST PATCH #: 206 (out of 465 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 126, we have euler=-28 (159054,476208,317126) : difference with theory (-27) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 127
Computing statistics for defect 127 [ (83,112,168) - 98.204 ]
      -white ( 96.57 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 90.19 , 3.55 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.189957 [log = -2.209869 ]- 96.566071 [log = -2.078528 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 127 with 15 vertices (convex hull=30).
5 of 100 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 9 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 13 edges
PATCH #:127:  FITNESS:   -66.59
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 147)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 8)
              BEST PATCH #: 119 (out of 293 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 127, we have euler=-27 (159056,476224,317141) : difference with theory (-26) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 128
Computing statistics for defect 128 [ (107,144,169) - 94.268 ]
      -white ( 98.37 , 3.76 ) 
      -gray ( 88.64 , 4.74 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.636520 [log = -2.283686 ]- 98.373299 [log = -2.315863 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 128 with 60 vertices (convex hull=93).
134 of 1636 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 46 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
                 cluster 2 has 6 edges
PATCH #:128:  FITNESS:   -69.75
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 266)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 81)
              BEST PATCH #: 253 (out of 516 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 128, we have euler=-26 (159074,476315,317215) : difference with theory (-25) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 129
Computing statistics for defect 129 [ (101,88,172) - 92.692 ]
      -white ( 97.08 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 87.13 , 7.09 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.132828 [log = -3.126553 ]- 97.075935 [log = -2.128300 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 129 with 57 vertices (convex hull=79).
97 of 1499 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 18 by 12 by 16 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 44 edges
                 cluster 1 has 10 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
PATCH #:129:  FITNESS:   -72.51
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 229)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 66)
              BEST PATCH #: 182 (out of 447 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 129, we have euler=-25 (159097,476416,317294) : difference with theory (-24) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 130
Computing statistics for defect 130 [ (113,144,172) - 93.308 ]
      -white ( 98.97 , 4.03 ) 
      -gray ( 88.77 , 4.36 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.774765 [log = -2.114102 ]- 98.971611 [log = -2.308224 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 130 with 60 vertices (convex hull=89).
80 of 1690 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 17 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 62 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:130:  FITNESS:   -67.73
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 285)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 256)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 60)
              BEST PATCH #: 292 (out of 551 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 130, we have euler=-24 (159115,476506,317367) : difference with theory (-23) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 131
Computing statistics for defect 131 [ (109,87,174) - 94.497 ]
      -white ( 98.25 , 3.68 ) 
      -gray ( 89.27 , 5.07 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.268768 [log = -2.419415 ]- 98.252785 [log = -2.267694 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 131 with 63 vertices (convex hull=98).
158 of 1795 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 16 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 43 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 10 edges
PATCH #:131:  FITNESS:   -69.05
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 214)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 192)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 39)
              BEST PATCH #: 147 (out of 416 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 131, we have euler=-23 (159135,476607,317449) : difference with theory (-22) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 132
Computing statistics for defect 132 [ (108,142,176) - 92.424 ]
      -white ( 97.08 , 4.04 ) 
      -gray ( 89.43 , 3.15 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.427818 [log = -2.058461 ]- 97.075050 [log = -2.307775 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 132 with 51 vertices (convex hull=76).
23 of 1252 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 18 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 49 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:132:  FITNESS:   -67.88
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 153)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 136)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 77)
              BEST PATCH #: 42 (out of 299 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 132, we have euler=-22 (159149,476683,317512) : difference with theory (-21) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 133
Computing statistics for defect 133 [ (128,146,175) - 95.860 ]
      -white ( 99.07 , 3.67 ) 
      -gray ( 88.85 , 3.13 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.850624 [log = -2.023140 ]- 99.065262 [log = -2.218135 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 133 with 52 vertices (convex hull=84).
38 of 1288 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 14 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 36 edges
                 cluster 1 has 13 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:133:  FITNESS:   -62.03
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 267)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  1 (out of 32)
              BEST PATCH #: 248 (out of 517 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 133, we have euler=-21 (159163,476760,317576) : difference with theory (-20) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 134
Computing statistics for defect 134 [ (134,141,175) - 92.646 ]
      -white ( 97.13 , 4.00 ) 
      -gray ( 88.08 , 4.08 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.083038 [log = -2.350706 ]- 97.125267 [log = -2.281887 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 134 with 14 vertices (convex hull=24).
4 of 87 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 9 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:134:  FITNESS:   -70.24
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 142)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 7)
              BEST PATCH #: 104 (out of 280 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 134, we have euler=-20 (159164,476773,317589) : difference with theory (-19) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 135
Computing statistics for defect 135 [ (93,104,177) - 94.931 ]
      -white ( 98.01 , 3.07 ) 
      -gray ( 88.45 , 2.64 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.451355 [log = -1.913153 ]- 98.012238 [log = -2.113398 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 135 with 22 vertices (convex hull=44).
12 of 219 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 10 by 10 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:135:  FITNESS:   -61.35
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 383)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 344)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 31)
              BEST PATCH #: 561 (out of 737 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 135, we have euler=-19 (159167,476798,317612) : difference with theory (-18) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 136
Computing statistics for defect 136 [ (90,127,179) - 97.034 ]
      -white ( 102.03 , 3.79 ) 
      -gray ( 91.20 , 2.96 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (91.196220 [log = -2.040537 ]- 102.027290 [log = -2.227931 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 136 with 37 vertices (convex hull=63).
38 of 628 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 12 by 11 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 27 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 3 edges
PATCH #:136:  FITNESS:   -63.40
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 203)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 215 (out of 397 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 136, we have euler=-18 (159179,476856,317659) : difference with theory (-17) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 137
Computing statistics for defect 137 [ (101,142,179) - 87.874 ]
      -white ( 94.54 , 4.26 ) 
      -gray ( 87.50 , 4.93 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.500969 [log = -2.097755 ]- 94.543839 [log = -2.317734 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 137 with 18 vertices (convex hull=33).
14 of 139 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 9 by 10 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 11 edges
PATCH #:137:  FITNESS:   -71.98
              MUTATIONS: 7 (out of 196)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 24)
              BEST PATCH #: 206 (out of 382 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 137, we have euler=-17 (159181,476876,317678) : difference with theory (-16) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 138
Computing statistics for defect 138 [ (124,146,183) - 89.808 ]
      -white ( 98.28 , 4.67 ) 
      -gray ( 88.81 , 3.67 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.812065 [log = -2.069523 ]- 98.282440 [log = -2.339515 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 138 with 40 vertices (convex hull=59).
41 of 739 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 11 by 18 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 2 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 27 edges
                 cluster 1 has 3 edges
PATCH #:138:  FITNESS:   -72.39
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 223)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 200)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 87)
              BEST PATCH #: 255 (out of 433 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 138, we have euler=-16 (159189,476932,317727) : difference with theory (-15) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 139
Computing statistics for defect 139 [ (112,90,181) - 95.809 ]
      -white ( 94.83 , 2.49 ) 
      -gray ( 85.92 , 6.18 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (85.915306 [log = -3.115305 ]- 94.829277 [log = -1.821430 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 139 with 9 vertices (convex hull=16).
0 of 36 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 9 by 6 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:139:  FITNESS:   -80.59
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 142)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 128)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 9)
              BEST PATCH #: 106 (out of 280 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 139, we have euler=-15 (159191,476943,317737) : difference with theory (-14) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 140
Computing statistics for defect 140 [ (125,90,184) - 92.741 ]
      -white ( 96.99 , 3.63 ) 
      -gray ( 86.80 , 5.35 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (86.799736 [log = -2.776898 ]- 96.986732 [log = -2.142186 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 140 with 113 vertices (convex hull=154).
719 of 5609 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 24 by 16 by 19 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 114 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 12 edges
PATCH #:140:  FITNESS:   -72.72
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 195)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 176)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 89)
              BEST PATCH #: 122 (out of 381 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 140, we have euler=-14 (159234,477142,317894) : difference with theory (-13) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 141
Computing statistics for defect 141 [ (93,142,183) - 90.138 ]
      -white ( 99.14 , 32.98 ) 
      -gray ( 83.80 , 8.54 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (83.799042 [log = -3.367729 ]- 99.143356 [log = -3.105197 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 141 with 13 vertices (convex hull=27).
0 of 78 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 6 by 10 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 5 edges
PATCH #:141:  FITNESS:   -89.48
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 115)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 104)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 12)
              BEST PATCH #: 49 (out of 229 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 141, we have euler=-13 (159236,477156,317907) : difference with theory (-12) = 1 


CORRECTING DEFECT 142
Computing statistics for defect 142 [ (96,143,179) - 89.445 ]
      -white ( 95.78 , 5.80 ) 
      -gray ( 85.89 , 10.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (85.885498 [log = -2.998250 ]- 95.775757 [log = -2.637011 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 142 with 95 vertices (convex hull=143).
683 of 3782 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 23 by 14 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 74 edges
                 cluster 1 has 14 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
PATCH #:142:  FITNESS:   -80.53
              MUTATIONS: 5 (out of 272)
              CROSSOVERS: 7 (out of 248)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 70)
              BEST PATCH #: 265 (out of 530 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 142, we have euler=-11 (159260,477292,318021) : difference with theory (-11) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 143
Computing statistics for defect 143 [ (129,144,189) - 93.274 ]
      -white ( 99.77 , 3.62 ) 
      -gray ( 90.11 , 3.06 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.112228 [log = -2.055663 ]- 99.766090 [log = -2.175892 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 143 with 77 vertices (convex hull=106).
333 of 2593 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 18 by 21 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 64 edges
                 cluster 1 has 23 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:143:  FITNESS:   -66.81
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 187)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 168)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 203)
              BEST PATCH #: 98 (out of 365 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 143, we have euler=-10 (159290,477426,318126) : difference with theory (-10) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 144
Computing statistics for defect 144 [ (109,98,186) - 94.633 ]
      -white ( 98.27 , 3.58 ) 
      -gray ( 90.48 , 4.30 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.480843 [log = -2.296849 ]- 98.271690 [log = -2.175072 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 144 with 50 vertices (convex hull=69).
74 of 1151 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 12 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 25 edges
                 cluster 1 has 17 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:144:  FITNESS:   -67.45
              MUTATIONS: 8 (out of 266)
              CROSSOVERS: 4 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 55)
              BEST PATCH #: 340 (out of 516 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 144, we have euler=-9 (159302,477491,318180) : difference with theory (-9) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 145
Computing statistics for defect 145 [ (101,114,190) - 96.762 ]
      -white ( 100.27 , 3.12 ) 
      -gray ( 88.90 , 3.12 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.898872 [log = -2.043333 ]- 100.271561 [log = -2.056872 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 145 with 38 vertices (convex hull=67).
37 of 666 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 10 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 14 edges
                 cluster 1 has 6 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:145:  FITNESS:   -61.52
              MUTATIONS: 8 (out of 521)
              CROSSOVERS: 10 (out of 472)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 21)
              BEST PATCH #: 817 (out of 1003 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 145, we have euler=-8 (159311,477544,318225) : difference with theory (-8) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 146
Computing statistics for defect 146 [ (102,130,192) - 93.619 ]
      -white ( 98.64 , 3.91 ) 
      -gray ( 89.89 , 2.79 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.893509 [log = -1.942520 ]- 98.636948 [log = -2.301694 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 146 with 68 vertices (convex hull=100).
84 of 2194 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 16 by 18 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (4 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 29 edges
                 cluster 1 has 19 edges
                 cluster 2 has 9 edges
PATCH #:146:  FITNESS:   -62.85
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 267)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 240)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  2 (out of 69)
              BEST PATCH #: 246 (out of 517 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 146, we have euler=-7 (159333,477652,318312) : difference with theory (-7) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 147
Computing statistics for defect 147 [ (127,98,191) - 93.355 ]
      -white ( 97.48 , 3.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.28 , 3.49 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.279510 [log = -2.002761 ]- 97.483192 [log = -2.271793 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 147 with 15 vertices (convex hull=25).
10 of 95 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 7 by 9 by 9 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 2 edges
PATCH #:147:  FITNESS:   -72.50
              MUTATIONS: 4 (out of 321)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 288)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 16)
              BEST PATCH #: 447 (out of 619 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 147, we have euler=-6 (159334,477667,318327) : difference with theory (-6) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 148
Computing statistics for defect 148 [ (110,115,192) - 93.816 ]
      -white ( 99.74 , 3.03 ) 
      -gray ( 90.40 , 2.78 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.401276 [log = -1.972095 ]- 99.741066 [log = -2.083530 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 148 with 69 vertices (convex hull=104).
147 of 2199 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 15 by 18 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 53 edges
                 cluster 1 has 16 edges
                 cluster 2 has 15 edges
PATCH #:148:  FITNESS:   -61.21
              MUTATIONS: 0 (out of 135)
              CROSSOVERS: 0 (out of 120)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 44)
              BEST PATCH #: 6 (out of 265 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 148, we have euler=-5 (159358,477781,318418) : difference with theory (-5) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 149
Computing statistics for defect 149 [ (118,137,192) - 95.236 ]
      -white ( 101.19 , 3.96 ) 
      -gray ( 89.50 , 3.04 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (89.504662 [log = -2.037371 ]- 101.192032 [log = -2.294111 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 149 with 39 vertices (convex hull=64).
19 of 722 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 14 by 13 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 36 edges
                 cluster 1 has 2 edges
                 cluster 2 has 2 edges
PATCH #:149:  FITNESS:   -70.32
              MUTATIONS: 6 (out of 357)
              CROSSOVERS: 3 (out of 320)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  3 (out of 60)
              BEST PATCH #: 503 (out of 687 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 149, we have euler=-4 (159367,477832,318461) : difference with theory (-4) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 150
Computing statistics for defect 150 [ (100,121,193) - 93.336 ]
      -white ( 97.25 , 3.19 ) 
      -gray ( 87.61 , 3.38 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (87.614418 [log = -2.130652 ]- 97.254890 [log = -2.118535 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 150 with 47 vertices (convex hull=74).
51 of 1030 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 14 by 12 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 4 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 23 edges
                 cluster 1 has 9 edges
                 cluster 2 has 7 edges
                 cluster 3 has 6 edges
PATCH #:150:  FITNESS:   -64.66
              MUTATIONS: 9 (out of 486)
              CROSSOVERS: 9 (out of 440)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  6 (out of 38)
              BEST PATCH #: 750 (out of 936 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 150, we have euler=-3 (159376,477888,318509) : difference with theory (-3) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 151
Computing statistics for defect 151 [ (97,138,192) - 88.938 ]
      -white ( 94.17 , 4.37 ) 
      -gray ( 85.54 , 6.17 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (85.539024 [log = -2.707065 ]- 94.170021 [log = -2.538654 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 151 with 10 vertices (convex hull=21).
1 of 44 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 8 by 9 by 7 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 1 segments were found (0 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 3 edges
PATCH #:151:  FITNESS:   -77.95
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 161)
              CROSSOVERS: 1 (out of 144)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 13)
              BEST PATCH #: 139 (out of 315 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 151, we have euler=-2 (159377,477899,318520) : difference with theory (-2) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 152
Computing statistics for defect 152 [ (121,102,195) - 93.891 ]
      -white ( 97.73 , 3.53 ) 
      -gray ( 90.57 , 4.89 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.567535 [log = -1.928075 ]- 97.733261 [log = -2.078361 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 152 with 48 vertices (convex hull=69).
66 of 1062 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 13 by 12 by 15 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (2 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 22 edges
                 cluster 1 has 12 edges
                 cluster 2 has 8 edges
PATCH #:152:  FITNESS:   -64.96
              MUTATIONS: 3 (out of 327)
              CROSSOVERS: 6 (out of 296)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  5 (out of 42)
              BEST PATCH #: 449 (out of 633 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 152, we have euler=-1 (159388,477961,318572) : difference with theory (-1) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 153
Computing statistics for defect 153 [ (116,110,198) - 94.982 ]
      -white ( 97.49 , 3.21 ) 
      -gray ( 90.14 , 3.70 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.137566 [log = -2.261332 ]- 97.494331 [log = -2.068622 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 153 with 98 vertices (convex hull=135).
446 of 4307 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 17 by 20 by 23 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (3 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 80 edges
                 cluster 1 has 21 edges
                 cluster 2 has 5 edges
PATCH #:153:  FITNESS:   -65.46
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 224)
              CROSSOVERS: 10 (out of 208)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 96)
              BEST PATCH #: 173 (out of 442 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 153, we have euler=0 (159422,478126,318704) : difference with theory (0) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 154
Computing statistics for defect 154 [ (125,129,200) - 92.883 ]
      -white ( 99.04 , 3.45 ) 
      -gray ( 90.44 , 3.24 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (90.437775 [log = -2.073255 ]- 99.042572 [log = -2.186479 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 154 with 183 vertices (convex hull=192).
866 of 15787 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 38 by 20 by 26 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 5 segments were found (6 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 177 edges
                 cluster 1 has 15 edges
                 cluster 2 has 14 edges
                 cluster 3 has 13 edges
                 cluster 4 has 10 edges
PATCH #:154:  FITNESS:   -66.56
              MUTATIONS: 1 (out of 241)
              CROSSOVERS: 2 (out of 216)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 390)
              BEST PATCH #: 208 (out of 467 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 154, we have euler=1 (159501,478472,318972) : difference with theory (1) = 0 


CORRECTING DEFECT 155
Computing statistics for defect 155 [ (107,128,199) - 93.538 ]
      -white ( 96.53 , 3.59 ) 
      -gray ( 88.42 , 3.37 ) 
      -gray ( 90.39 , 17.52 ) - white ( 100.14 , 16.10 ) 
      -intensity (88.423889 [log = -2.101862 ]- 96.525719 [log = -2.148922 ])
      -curvature(kmax=-0.081662 : rmin = 12.245664 |  kmin=-0.059886 : rmax = 16.698440 )
      - k1 ( -0.05 , 0.75 ) - k2 ( -0.03 , 0.29 ) 
retessellating defect 155 with 40 vertices (convex hull=51).
32 of 748 overlapping edges discarded
Defect size : 14 by 12 by 11 (scale = 2)
Edge Clustering: 3 segments were found (1 were discarded )
                 cluster 0 has 30 edges
                 cluster 1 has 5 edges
                 cluster 2 has 4 edges
PATCH #:155:  FITNESS:   -73.05
              MUTATIONS: 2 (out of 202)
              CROSSOVERS: 5 (out of 184)
              ELIMINATED VERTICES:  0 (out of 66)
              BEST PATCH #: 137 (out of 396 generated patches)
After retessellation of defect 155, we have euler=2 (159514,478536,319024) : difference with theory (2) = 0 

computing original vertex metric properties...
storing new metric properties...
computing tessellation statistics...
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.26 (0.00-->10.46) (max @ vno 160354 --> 161449)
face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00)
performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations...
vertex spacing 0.88 +- 0.26 (0.00-->10.46) (max @ vno 160354 --> 161449)
face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00)
tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface...
446 mutations (35.4%), 815 crossovers (64.6%), 451 vertices were eliminated
building final representation...
13674 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation
after topology correction, eno=2 (nv=159514, nf=319024, ne=478536, g=0)
writing corrected surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig...

0.000 % of the vertices (0 vertices) exhibit an orientation change
topology fixing took 677.4 minutes
reading brain volume from brain...
reading wm segmentation from wm...
0 defective edges
---------------------------------------------
Euler Number rh Sat Jan 21 07:04:41 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf
mris_euler_number /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig
euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 159514 - 478536 + 319024 = 2 --> 0 holes
      F =2V-4:          319024 = 319028-4 (0)
      2E=3F:            957072 = 957072 (0)

total defect index = 0
Euler: NHoles = 0
---------------------------------------------
Smooth2 rh Sat Jan 21 07:04:45 EST 2006
mris_smooth /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.smoothwm
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...
writing smoothed curvature to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.curv
writing smoothed area to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.area
---------------------------------------------
Inflation2 rh Sat Jan 21 07:05:04 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_inflate -dist 0 /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.smoothwm /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.inflated
l_dist = 0.000
avg radius = 46.8 mm, total surface area = 79770 mm^2
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_spring_norm=1.000
mom=0.90, dt=0.90
desired rms height=0.015
writing inflated surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.inflated
writing sulcal depths to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.sulc
inflation took 3.6 minutes
inflating to desired rms height = 0.015
000: dt: 0.0000, rms height=0.158, avgs=16
005: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.123, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
010: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.095, avgs=16, l_dist=0.00
015: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.080, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
020: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.068, avgs=8, l_dist=0.00
025: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.059, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
030: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.053, avgs=4, l_dist=0.00
035: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.047, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
040: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.042, avgs=2, l_dist=0.00
045: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.038, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
050: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.035, avgs=1, l_dist=0.00
055: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.033, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00
060: dt: 0.9000, rms height=0.032, avgs=0, l_dist=0.00

inflation complete.
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.sulc
---------------------------------------------
Make Final Surf rh Sat Jan 21 07:08:43 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/scripts
mris_make_surfaces -w 0 EEsurf rh
write iterations = 0
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/filled...
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/brain...
reading volume /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri/wm...
15333 bright wm thresholded.
2452 bright non-wm voxels segmented.
computing class statistics...
border white:    320255 voxels (1.91%)
border gray      360228 voxels (2.15%)
WM: 101.2 +- 5.5 [70.0 --> 110.0]
GM: 84.6 +- 10.8 [30.0 --> 110.0]
setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 73.9 (was 70)
setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 106.7 (was 105)
setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 84.6 (was 85)
setting MAX_CSF to 63.1 (was 40)
setting MAX_GRAY to 95.7 (was 95)
setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 79.2 (was 75)
setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 52.3 (was 40)
reading original surface position from /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.orig...
repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000
vertex spacing 0.80 +- 0.25 (0.02-->9.92) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.15 (0.00-->10.13)
mean absolute distance = 0.83 +- 1.15
5556 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.27 (0.03-->10.01) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.15 (0.00-->9.83)
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.07-->10.00) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.16 (0.00-->10.00)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.07-->10.00) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.16 (0.00-->10.00)
mean absolute distance = 0.60 +- 0.89
7513 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.04-->9.98) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->12.32)
mean absolute distance = 0.52 +- 0.70
6407 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.04-->9.99) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->12.34)
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.08-->9.99) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->12.42)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.28 (0.08-->9.99) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->12.42)
mean absolute distance = 0.45 +- 0.59
5458 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean.
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=1.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

writing white matter surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.white...
writing smoothed curvature to rh.curv
vertex spacing 0.87 +- 0.27 (0.09-->9.97) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.32 +- 0.18 (0.00-->12.72)
repositioning cortical surface to gray/csf boundary.
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.84 +- 0.30 (0.03-->9.26) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.18 (0.00-->8.10)
vertex spacing 0.90 +- 0.37 (0.02-->9.52) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.21 (0.00-->5.89)
vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.41 (0.02-->9.49) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.22 (0.00-->5.82)
vertex spacing 0.95 +- 0.43 (0.02-->9.43) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.23 (0.00-->5.62)
vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.43 (0.05-->9.41) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.27 +- 0.24 (0.00-->6.82)
mean inside = 97.8, mean outside = 87.5
smoothing surface for 5 iterations...
mean border=93.1, 632 (632) missing vertices, mean dist 0.0 [0.9 (%45.0)->0.8 (%55.0))]
%77 local maxima, %22 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=3790314.8, rms=10.12
001: dt: 0.5000, sse=6092529.0, rms=8.34
002: dt: 0.5000, sse=6173613.0, rms=6.62
003: dt: 0.5000, sse=6327463.5, rms=5.13
004: dt: 0.5000, sse=6296519.0, rms=3.99
005: dt: 0.5000, sse=6361939.5, rms=3.48
006: dt: 0.5000, sse=6349553.5, rms=3.18
rms = 3.19, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
007: dt: 0.2500, sse=5428300.0, rms=2.93
rms = 2.92, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
008: dt: 0.2500, sse=5082994.5, rms=2.92
009: dt: 0.1250, sse=4973723.5, rms=2.75
rms = 2.71, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
010: dt: 0.1250, sse=4952886.5, rms=2.71
positioning took 15.6 minutes
mean border=94.3, 634 (297) missing vertices, mean dist -0.3 [0.7 (%61.5)->0.4 (%38.5))]
%83 local maxima, %15 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5115451.0, rms=3.75
011: dt: 0.5000, sse=5814610.0, rms=3.28
012: dt: 0.5000, sse=6436559.0, rms=3.03
rms = 3.08, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
013: dt: 0.2500, sse=5925382.5, rms=2.85
rms = 2.87, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 2.81, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
014: dt: 0.1250, sse=5865085.5, rms=2.81
positioning took 6.5 minutes
mean border=95.1, 629 (215) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.6 (%61.2)->0.4 (%38.8))]
%88 local maxima, %11 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5885828.0, rms=3.34
rms = 3.43, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
015: dt: 0.2500, sse=5795259.5, rms=3.15
016: dt: 0.2500, sse=5871556.0, rms=3.06
rms = 3.01, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
017: dt: 0.2500, sse=5997869.0, rms=3.01
018: dt: 0.1250, sse=5963321.0, rms=2.79
019: dt: 0.1250, sse=6001899.0, rms=2.74
rms = 2.72, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
020: dt: 0.1250, sse=6037390.0, rms=2.72
positioning took 8.3 minutes
mean border=95.4, 763 (187) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.5 (%55.7)->0.4 (%44.3))]
%89 local maxima, % 9 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6038385.5, rms=2.89
rms = 2.91, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
021: dt: 0.2500, sse=6246629.5, rms=2.71
rms = 2.68, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
022: dt: 0.2500, sse=6775203.5, rms=2.68
023: dt: 0.1250, sse=6809385.0, rms=2.53
rms = 2.48, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
024: dt: 0.1250, sse=6890215.0, rms=2.48
positioning took 5.5 minutes
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.curv
smoothing surface for 5 iterations...
mean border=75.6, 709 (709) missing vertices, mean dist 1.4 [2.7 (%0.6)->3.6 (%99.4))]
%19 local maxima, %19 large gradients and %62 min vals, 2136 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6100469.0, rms=21.43
001: dt: 0.5000, sse=5668469.5, rms=19.61
002: dt: 0.5000, sse=5318440.5, rms=17.97
003: dt: 0.5000, sse=5091130.0, rms=16.44
004: dt: 0.5000, sse=4977657.5, rms=14.99
005: dt: 0.5000, sse=5010911.0, rms=13.53
006: dt: 0.5000, sse=5141236.5, rms=12.16
007: dt: 0.5000, sse=5442026.5, rms=10.92
008: dt: 0.5000, sse=5790469.0, rms=9.86
009: dt: 0.5000, sse=6166351.0, rms=8.97
010: dt: 0.5000, sse=6528313.0, rms=8.27
011: dt: 0.5000, sse=6865480.5, rms=7.71
012: dt: 0.5000, sse=7125827.5, rms=7.27
013: dt: 0.5000, sse=7395367.5, rms=6.91
014: dt: 0.5000, sse=7537721.5, rms=6.62
015: dt: 0.5000, sse=7705945.5, rms=6.38
016: dt: 0.5000, sse=7816419.0, rms=6.21
017: dt: 0.5000, sse=7966252.5, rms=6.08
018: dt: 0.5000, sse=7961000.0, rms=5.97
019: dt: 0.5000, sse=8059604.0, rms=5.90
020: dt: 0.5000, sse=8039985.5, rms=5.84
rms = 5.81, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
021: dt: 0.5000, sse=8114412.5, rms=5.81
022: dt: 0.2500, sse=6282572.0, rms=5.50
023: dt: 0.2500, sse=6204900.5, rms=5.45
rms = 5.45, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
024: dt: 0.1250, sse=6031042.0, rms=5.35
025: dt: 0.1250, sse=5735741.0, rms=5.21
026: dt: 0.1250, sse=5663313.5, rms=5.10smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=8, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.44 (0.04-->9.38) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.35 +- 0.31 (0.00-->10.40)
smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250
averaging target values for 5 iterations...
tol=1.0e-04, host=varda, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.500, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000
mom=0.00, dt=0.50

vertex spacing 0.94 +- 0.44 (0.04-->9.39) (max @ vno 156404 --> 156615)
face area 0.35 +- 0.31 (0.00-->11.84)
writing pial surface to /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.pial...
measuring cortical thickness...
writing cortical thickness estimate to 'thickness' file.
positioning took 133.0 minutes

rms = 5.08, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
027: dt: 0.1250, sse=5647234.0, rms=5.08
positioning took 45.7 minutes
mean border=74.5, 4333 (299) missing vertices, mean dist 0.2 [0.3 (%39.3)->0.9 (%60.7))]
%28 local maxima, %15 large gradients and %54 min vals, 1535 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5903379.0, rms=5.64
rms = 5.82, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
028: dt: 0.2500, sse=5724084.0, rms=5.37
029: dt: 0.2500, sse=5721543.5, rms=5.15
rms = 5.44, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 5.10, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
030: dt: 0.1250, sse=5638189.0, rms=5.10
positioning took 9.2 minutes
mean border=74.5, 5633 (288) missing vertices, mean dist 0.1 [0.3 (%43.4)->0.7 (%56.6))]
%32 local maxima, %11 large gradients and %54 min vals, 1572 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5640709.0, rms=5.12
rms = 5.65, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
031: dt: 0.2500, sse=5633098.5, rms=4.97
032: dt: 0.2500, sse=5990916.0, rms=4.90
rms = 5.24, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 4.86, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
033: dt: 0.1250, sse=5899093.0, rms=4.86
positioning took 8.4 minutes
mean border=74.3, 11056 (280) missing vertices, mean dist 0.1 [0.2 (%45.0)->0.5 (%55.0))]
%32 local maxima, %10 large gradients and %51 min vals, 1492 gradients ignored
000: dt: 0.0000, sse=5905716.0, rms=4.89
rms = 5.47, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250...
034: dt: 0.2500, sse=5881858.0, rms=4.79
035: dt: 0.2500, sse=6362591.5, rms=4.68
rms = 5.09, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125...
rms = 4.66, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062...
036: dt: 0.1250, sse=6284895.0, rms=4.66
positioning took 9.6 minutes
0 of 159514 vertices processed
25000 of 159514 vertices processed
50000 of 159514 vertices processed
75000 of 159514 vertices processed
100000 of 159514 vertices processed
125000 of 159514 vertices processed
150000 of 159514 vertices processed
0 of 159514 vertices processed
25000 of 159514 vertices processed
50000 of 159514 vertices processed
75000 of 159514 vertices processed
100000 of 159514 vertices processed
125000 of 159514 vertices processed
150000 of 159514 vertices processed
thickness calculation complete, 1355:2899 truncations.
30431 vertices at 0 distance
95077 vertices at 1 distance
95775 vertices at 2 distance
55668 vertices at 3 distance
25416 vertices at 4 distance
9872 vertices at 5 distance
3562 vertices at 6 distance
1375 vertices at 7 distance
577 vertices at 8 distance
317 vertices at 9 distance
210 vertices at 10 distance
169 vertices at 11 distance
124 vertices at 12 distance
87 vertices at 13 distance
78 vertices at 14 distance
66 vertices at 15 distance
45 vertices at 16 distance
46 vertices at 17 distance
47 vertices at 18 distance
28 vertices at 19 distance
58 vertices at 20 distance
writing curvature file /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.thickness
---------------------------------------------
Making vol mask of cortical ribbon rh Sat Jan 21 09:21:40 EST 2006
/home/christip/EE/EEsurf/mri
mri_surf2vol --mkmask --hemi rh --fillribbon --template orig --volregidentity EEsurf --outvol rh.ribbon.mgz
gdiagno = -1
Using identity matrix for registration
Qa2v: SurfXYZ to VolCRS: ------------------------------
-1.000   0.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000  -1.000   128.000;
 0.000   1.000   0.000   128.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
--------------------------------------------------
subjects dir   /home/christip/EE
hemi           rh
mksurfmask     1
projfrac       0
volreg file    (null)
outvol   path  rh.ribbon.mgz
template path  orig
------- Anat2Vol Registration (TkReg)----
 1.000   0.000   0.000   0.000;
 0.000   1.000   0.000   0.000;
 0.000   0.000   1.000   0.000;
 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;
-----------------------------------------
height = 256
 width = 256
 depth = 256
 xsize = 1.000000
 ysize = 1.000000
 zsize = 1.000000
  cdc  = -1.000000 0.000000 0.000000
  rdc  = 0.000000 0.000000 -1.000000
  sdc  = 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000
  xyz0 = -0.900009 -0.000068 0.000053
Gdiag_no  -1
Reading surface /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.white
Done reading source surface
Reading thickness /home/christip/EE/EEsurf/surf/rh.thickness
Done
surf nframes = 1
INFO: mapping vertices to closest voxel
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.00, 97178 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.05, 97895 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.10, 99127 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.15, 99982 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.20, 100434 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.25, 99795 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.30, 98424 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.35, 96634 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.40, 94977 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.45, 93336 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.50, 91847 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.55, 90720 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.60, 89688 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.65, 88751 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.70, 87612 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.75, 86580 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.80, 85653 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.85, 84483 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.90, 83488 hits
INFO: resampling surface to volume at projfrac=0.95, 82579 hits
INFO: writing output volume to rh.ribbon.mgz
done

-------------------------------------------

recon-all finished without error at Sat Jan 21 09:23:17 EST 2006