<!-- Title: Eve shift. Mon Oct  9, 2000 -->
<!-- Leader: Willis Sakumoto -->
<!-- Ace: Pedro Amaral -->
<!-- Co1: Ken Hatakeyama -->
<!-- Co2: Simona Rolli -->
<!-- Co3: D. Benjamin (SOS) -->
<!-- Co4: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Co5: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Notes: -->
<pre>Colliding beam operations scheduled to end at 4pm. 
However, we still have beam, and will continue taking 
data.</pre>


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 16:44:17 2000 -->
<pre>The MCR says they are keeping the beam they are 
doing some studies with it. They will kill it when 
they are done, which they say can be anywhere from 
a few minutes to a half hour or so. 
We have ended the previous run at about 4:05 pm. 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Willis Sakumoto -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 16;51;48 comment by...Willis Sakumoto -->
<pre>(Run 100892)</pre>


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 16:57:18 2000 -->
<pre>The fer code was modified to increase the delay between blocks  
of 2K when sending data to the VRBs. The number of tries when 
sending data has been increased by a factor of 10. 
 
The spurious error message about the  
 
  no valid calibration for download 
 
was changed (you will now get a unknown error message). 
 
The scaler monitor now divides the rate by the factor given 
by M Schmidt. The rates should now be correct... If there 
are problems let chlebana know... 
 
Updates to the COT calibration code. 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Frank Chlebana -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 17;01;04 comment by...Frank Chlebana -->
Crates pcal04, cmu00, cmu01 and pcal00 have been rebooted.

Need to reboot the other crates for the change to take effect...

Run 100895


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 17:25:01 2000 -->
<pre>Run 100896 : still having collisions.  
min bias table: L3_pass_all_null, Myron mode. 
Busy timeout on VRB_SVX_02. h/r/r didnt work. 
Run stopped after 32000 events.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro Amaral :: (run 100896) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 17:30:36 2000 -->
<pre>MCR calls and informs us the beam will be dumped. 
This occured at 17:27.</pre>
<!-- Author: Willis Sakumoto -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 17:32:00 2000 -->
<pre>Couldn't end run due to EVB. 
Clean up EVB from Ace panel. 
Beam is now gone.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100896) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 17:48:35 2000 -->
<pre>Some interesting events to look at: 
 
Events selected based on activity in both the EM and HA section... and high total energy 
 
 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20903 Etot = 51444 nChanEM = 114 nChanHA = 13 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20907 Etot = 74417 nChanEM = 165 nChanHA = 6 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20935 Etot = 113546 nChanEM = 215 nChanHA = 24 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20939 Etot = 65620 nChanEM = 166 nChanHA = 26 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20943 Etot = 78449 nChanEM = 120 nChanHA = 23 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20955 Etot = 83864 nChanEM = 110 nChanHA = 25 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20967 Etot = 100525 nChanEM = 167 nChanHA = 47 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20987 Etot = 24085 nChanEM = 43 nChanHA = 11 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20991 Etot = 77078 nChanEM = 139 nChanHA = 28 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20992 Etot = 7878 nChanEM = 29 nChanHA = 16 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20995 Etot = 61168 nChanEM = 24 nChanHA = 8 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/20999 Etot = 34740 nChanEM = 21 nChanHA = 6 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21035 Etot = 75892 nChanEM = 109 nChanHA = 16 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21079 Etot = 109615 nChanEM = 98 nChanHA = 17 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21111 Etot = 58606 nChanEM = 88 nChanHA = 14 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21135 Etot = 76679 nChanEM = 151 nChanHA = 35 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21159 Etot = 66797 nChanEM = 135 nChanHA = 23 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21191 Etot = 43215 nChanEM = 87 nChanHA = 12 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21219 Etot = 155277 nChanEM = 257 nChanHA = 45 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21347 Etot = 76589 nChanEM = 141 nChanHA = 22 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21367 Etot = 86308 nChanEM = 133 nChanHA = 25 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21371 Etot = 43690 nChanEM = 129 nChanHA = 14 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21411 Etot = 123516 nChanEM = 91 nChanHA = 5 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/21911 Etot = 71793 nChanEM = 71 nChanHA = 12 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/22023 Etot = 104146 nChanEM = 154 nChanHA = 26 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/22027 Etot = 110815 nChanEM = 191 nChanHA = 31 
>>> Run/Trigger = 100896/22111 Etot = 76802 nChanEM = 149 nChanHA = 30 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Frank Chlebana :: (run 100896) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 18:12:54 2000 -->
<pre>Rebooting crates for Frank's changes to take effect: L1, L2. B0l2cl02 did not reboot with CDF SysReset. rebooting by hand (reset_crate b0l2cl02). 
Ccal, Pcal, Wcal, Cot, muons rebooted. 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 18:42:49 2000 -->
Taking SVT crates for a short test.  
<!-- Author: Bill Ashmanskas, Stefano Belforte -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 22;01;24 comment by...Bill -->
We're done.  See L2 logbook.  Please include SVT in run any time SVX is included.
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 19:01:48 2000 -->
<pre>Calibrations: 
QIE: fail 10 on b0wcal02, b0wcal07. 
Taking out wcal02, 07: run 100898.  
Qie Calib ended, but the data is nowhere to be found. 
Tony and Frank bugged.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 19;19;52 comment by...R. Erbacher -->
As noted in last week's logs, wcal02 and wcal07 have power supplies in fault and should not be included in the runs until after the access tomorrow morning.  
<!-- Comment: Tue Oct 10 01;47;29 comment by...R.J. Tesarek -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030>There is no need to exclude these crates from any configuration.
A power supply for an analog voltage is in fault (off) for crates
b0wcal02,07.  This means that the ADMEMS will produce NO OUTPUT.
It is worthwhile including these crates in the integration to 
stress the DAQ.</td></tr></td></table>
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 19:19:07 2000 -->
<pre>Tony found the problem: too many consumers connected to partition 0. 
Took QIE calib with partition 1. Calib successful. Plots in logbook.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100900) -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Oct 10 09;32;23 comment by...TonyV -->
<pre>A clarification: if ten consumers, for example, are requesting
events from the same partition, and they are all requesting
every event, then the CSL cannot send each event to all 
consumers. A few consumers will receive the event, then
a few different consumers will receive the next event, etc.
For the moment, a general rule should be to run calibrations
in partitions with little activity, so the calibration consumers
don't have to compete with all the other consumers.</pre>
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 19:45:48 2000 -->
<pre>LED calib failed: 
Log file (/data1/cdfdaq/consumers/log/runLedCalibConsumer_x_6_2000-10-09_19:40:48.log) has: 
 
g shared libraries: /cdf/code-Linux-2.0.34/cdfoffline/dist/releases/3.8.0/lib/Linux2-KCC_3_3/libRawDataBanksDict.so: undefined symbol: commit__17CSXD_StorableBankFv 
 
Phillipe Gris mailed/phoned. Moving to something else.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100907) -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 20;43;10 comment by...Willis Sakumoto -->
<pre>Of the shift calibrations, only the QIE calibration was
successful. We are moving on to the next item in the
to-do list: CR data with commissioning_table_2 v5 with
various sum Et thresholds.</pre>
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:22:53 2000 -->
<pre>Tevatron status: no colliding beam, but Tevatron studies in 
progress.</pre>
<!-- Author: Willis Sakumoto -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:26:51 2000 -->
<pre>Still some discrepancies between trigger simulation and data as for Trigger Towers. 
 
 RUN NUMBER =  100892 
 TRGSim SUMMARY AFTER 5632 EVENTS  
 **********************************  
 ********** DIRAC SUMMARY ********** 
 After 5632 events, DIRAC33,  disagrees  2 times in word 3 
 After 5632 events, DIRAC37,  disagrees  1 times in word 3 
 After 5632 events, DIRAC40,  disagrees  6 times in word 1 
 After 5632 events, DIRAC40,  disagrees  16 times in word 2 
 After 5632 events, DIRAC76,  disagrees  5 times in word 2 
 ********** DIRAC BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** CRATESUM SUMMARY ********** 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  9 times in word 1 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  3 times in word 2 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  8 times in word 3 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  1 times in word 4 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  2 times in word 5 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  1 times in word 7 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  86 times in word 1 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  17 times in word 2 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  86 times in word 3 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  19 times in word 5 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM9,  disagrees  2 times in word 2 
 After 5632 events, CRATESUM9,  disagrees  2 times in word 7 
 ********** CRATESUM BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** CRATESUM/DIRAC BC SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** HOT CABLES SUMMARY  *********** 
 After 5632 events, eta = 17, phi = 8 EM tower fired 2 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 17, phi = 9 EM tower fired 1 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 18, phi = 10 EM tower fired 3 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 18, phi = 10 HAD tower fired 1 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 19, phi = 10 EM tower fired 5 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 19, phi = 10 HAD tower fired 6 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 20, phi = 10 EM tower fired 11 times 
: After 5632 events, eta = 20, phi = 10 HAD tower fired 13 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 10 EM tower fired 3 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 10 HAD tower fired 2 times 
 ********** DCAS  SUMMARY  *********** 
 After 5632 events, eta = 5, phi = 12 EM tower energy disagrees 129 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 6, phi = 12 EM tower energy disagrees 4  
times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 7, phi = 12 EM tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 17, phi = 8 EM tower energy disagrees 111 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 17, phi = 9 EM tower energy disagrees 97 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 17, phi = 10 EM tower energy disagrees 110 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 18, phi = 10 EM tower energy disagrees 149 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 18, phi = 10 HAD tower energy disagrees 49 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 19, phi = 10 EM tower energy disagrees 215 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 19, phi = 10 HAD tower energy disagrees 81 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 20, phi = 10 EM tower energy disagrees 340 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 20, phi = 10 HAD tower energy disagrees 227 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 20, phi = 19 HAD tower energy disagrees 313 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 0 HAD tower energy disagrees 66 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 10 EM tower energy disagrees 44 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 10 HAD tower energy disagrees 41 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 19 HAD tower energy disagrees 313 times 
 After 5632 events, eta = 21, phi = 19 HAD tower energy disagrees 313 times 
 
 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Simona :: (run 100892) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:28:38 2000 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-297&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-297  width='250' align='top'></td><td>see entry of Mon Oct 9 20:26:51  </a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Simona -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:32:55 2000 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-298&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-298  width='250' align='top'></td><td>run 100896, same as before</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Simona -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 20;45;46 comment by...Pedro -->
Note disagreement between data and simulation
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:43:28 2000 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-299&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-299  width='250' align='top'></td><td>TrigMon</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Matt -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 20;45;02 comment by...Matt -->
TFRD triggers from Run 100887, per request from Greg and Carla.  Trigger 0 is SumEt.  Trigger 21 is min bias.  Trigger 23 is beam crossing.  
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:44:13 2000 -->
<pre>Cosmics with the calorimeter. 
Trigger table L3_Pass_all_NULL. 
Fred modified with cdfvme Fdaq, scenario 1. 
sumet trigger at 10 GeV.  
 
Note: Too many consumers might clog the CSL, and cause 
the run to stop taking in more events.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100915) -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 20;51;31 comment by...Pedro -->
Might have Fred wrong.
Doing it again...
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:49:54 2000 -->
<pre>Excerpts from the XMon summary for Run 100887 showing rates for all of the triggers, including 21 (minbias) and 23 (beam crossing).  Cross sections are not filled because no luminosity was available.  See also the TrigMon plot above. 
 
 
************* XMon Summary ************ 
 
Run 100887    Latest Event 198       Mon Oct  9 17:11:45 2000 
 
  Time            seconds             % 
  ------------------------------------- 
  Live              0.841        87.815 
  Dead              0.117        12.185 
  Run               0.958 
 
  L1 Trigger           count      rate (Hz)           cross section(ub) 
                                       unPS          unPS            PS 
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
   0                      27         32.097        -1.000        -1.000 
   4                     116        137.900        -1.000        -1.000 
  12                     116        137.900        -1.000        -1.000 
  21                     495        588.453        -1.000        -1.000 
  23                  177021     210441.672         0.000         0.000 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Matt -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Oct 10 08;45;24 comment by...Michael Schmidt -->
I suspect that these rates need to be muiltiplied by
36/159 to convert from rates per livetime to `wall clock'
rates.  If I knew Matt's user name I would send him
email with further explanation.
<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 20:54:07 2000 -->
<pre>Ended run 100915: "hand set" trigger bits incorrectly set. 
Don't use.</pre>
<!-- Author: Willis Sakumoto :: (run 100915) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 21:04:45 2000 -->
<pre>Same as before. Fred correct this time. 
Run stopped after 12801 events.  
Problem with too many consumers connected to CSL ??? 
No errors in errorlogger...</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100918) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 21:20:14 2000 -->
<pre> **********************************  
 RUN NUMBER =  100922 
 TRGSim SUMMARY AFTER 400 EVENTS  
 **********************************  
 ********** SUMET SUMMARY ********** 
 ---------------- number of pfsumet errors 0  sumet  value in real TL1D different than simulation  ********** PREFRED CALTRIG SUMMARY ********** 
 ---------------- number of caltrig errors 0 after 400 events  
 **********************************  
 RUN NUMBER =  100922 
 TRGSim SUMMARY AFTER 400 EVENTS  
 **********************************  
 ********** DIRAC SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** DIRAC BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 After 400 events, DIRAC bounch counter32,  disagrees  400 times 
 ********** CRATESUM SUMMARY ********** 
 After 400 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  1 times in  word 1 
 After 400 events, CRATESUM5,  disagrees  1 times in  word 4 
 ********** CRATESUM BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** CRATESUM/DIRAC BC SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** DCAS  SUMMARY  *********** 
 After 400 events, eta = 3, phi = 0 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 3, phi = 1 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 3, phi = 11 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 3, phi = 22 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 3, phi = 23 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 4, phi = 1 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 4, phi = 2 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 4, phi = 3 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 18, phi = 2 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 19, phi = 2 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 19, phi = 4 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
 After 400 events, eta = 19, phi = 11 EM tower energy disagrees 12 times 
 **********************************  
</pre>
<!-- Author: Simona :: (run 100922) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 21:20:24 2000 -->
<pre>Took a couple short runs, 100920 and 100921, to test the 
cot crates again. The crate list alluded to earlier 
(see run summary log, run 100878) is still valid. 
 
Also took a COT calibration run, 100923</pre>
<!-- Author: Bill Orejudos -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 21:28:25 2000 -->
<pre>Cosmics Same as before.  
Connecting consumers one by one, to see if CLS stops. 
90000 evts, so far... 
 
Dirac BC mismatches on b0l1cl02. Fdaq is up... 
 
Run stopped with 102000 evetnts with segmentation violation  
on java </pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100922) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 21:49:22 2000 -->
<pre>COT calibration. 
 
Do NOT use Cot crates: 0,4,5,6,15</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100925) -->



<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 22:44:14 2000 -->
<pre>Noticed strange interaction of EVD with the FVWM2 window manager: 
LEGO window always pop up on a 0-th desktop, such that if EVD was 
started from any other desktop, LEGO display immediately goes out 
of sight. 
 
Dmitri Litvinsev notified.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pasha Murat -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Oct  9 22;54;25 comment by...Pasha -->
<pre>I actually meant MON, running in consumer mode, not EVD.
Partition used: 2</pre>


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 22:57:25 2000 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-300&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-300  width='250' align='top'></td><td>Run 100931  Had Tower discrepancy between simulation and data</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Simona -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 22:58:01 2000 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-301&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2000&action=view&page=-301  width='250' align='top'></td><td>Had trigger towers occupancy</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Simona -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 23:03:45 2000 -->
<pre>More comics, with all cal. 
 
Investigating why evd-lego doesn't work. (see previous entry) 
b0l1cl02 rebooted: watching for Dirac BC... 
 
Ending run with 50000 evts. 
Consumers receiving events (Ymon, Lummon, TrigMon, evd), but VERY slowly... 
 
triggering on sumet 10 GeV and min bias. 
110000 evts. 
Trigsim online results to follow. 
Dirac BC ok. 
 
Going to increase sumet thresholds to 20 GeV</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100931) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 23:03:57 2000 -->
<pre> End Run ! 
 **********************************  
 RUN NUMBER =  100931 
 TRGSim SUMMARY AFTER 3508 EVENTS  
 **********************************  
 ********** DIRAC SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** DIRAC BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** CRATESUM SUMMARY ********** 
 After 3508 events, CRATESUM4,  disagrees  2 times in  word 1 
 After 3508 events, CRATESUM7,  disagrees  2 times in  word 1 
 After 3508 events, CRATESUM8,  disagrees  1 times in  word 1 
 ********** CRATESUM BOUNCH COUNTER SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** CRATESUM/DIRAC BC SUMMARY ********** 
 ********** HOT CABLES SUMMARY  *********** 
 ********** DCAS  SUMMARY  *********** 
 After 3508 events, eta = 18, phi = 10 HAD tower energy disagrees 1 times 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Simona :: (run 100931) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 23:31:09 2000 -->
<pre>(Marvel) Comics, with sumet at 20 GeV. Just Cal and L1 Cal trigger... Sounds familiar... ... ... 
 
All consumers going fine now. 
(Starting a new run seems to have fixed previous histogram 
updating problems...) 
 
Ilya is going to take EVB and L3. 
We'll keep on taking cosmics with sevb.</pre>
<!-- Author: Pedro :: (run 100932) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 23:31:48 2000 -->
<pre> We notice that reformatter complains about Event ID mismatch 
between SCPUs. The errors come from 2 processor nodes, 
b0l3022 and b0l3021, the rate is approximately 10%. This 
corresponds to subfarm 10. It appears to be internal  
level3 problem. Thus, in this run approx. 2.5% 
of all events are lost (discarded by L3). The run 
contains 4 subfarms.</pre>
<!-- Author: Ilya Kravchenko :: (run 100932) -->


<!-- Date: Mon Oct 9 23:52:05 2000 -->
<pre>Rob Roser has put new Cryo sheets in the SOS's 
knowledge book</pre>
<!-- Author: Saltzberg (SOS) -->


<!-- Date: Tue Oct 10 00:03:28 2000 -->
<font color=red>Shift Summary: </font><pre>1) Colliding beam on period: 1600-1730 
   - Run 100895: Min bias, Myron mode, 32k events 
2) Frank Chlebana put in fixes to the front end DAQ 
   - 'No valid calibration to download' from pcal04 message 
     was erroneous and a fix put in. It is due to lots of 
     data being sent to the VRBs. 
   - Updated scaler monitor (from M. Schmidt) 
   - Updated COT calibration 
3) Calibrations: QIE and COT successful 
4) CR data with table 2 v5 #1 
   - Data taking conditions 
      > Non Myron mode with 0 bias prescale at 1e8 
      > Sum Et > 10, 20, 40, ..... 
        (this is to study the fraction of events that are 
         single phototube spikes) 
   - Runs taken 
      100922, sum Et > 10,  90k,  
      100931, sum Et > 10, 105k, 35 hz (from trigger rate) 
      100932, sum Et > 20, 101k, 18 hz 
      100933, sum Et > 40, ----,  8 hz </pre> 
<br><b>End of Shift Numbers</b>
<table><tr><td width=60% align=left>
<b>CDF Run II <p></b>                       
<pre>
Runs                   100895, 100922, 100931, 100932
Delivered Luminosity   1e-5  pb-1
Acquired Luminosity    .2e-5  pb-1
Efficiency             20%
   
</td></tr></table></pre>
<!-- Author: Willis Sakumoto -->


<!-- Date: Tue Oct 10 00:09:13 2000 -->
<pre>Raising SumEt to 40 GeV. 
Had to reboot b0tsi00 to get going (2nd time tonight) 
 
Ended at 10k events...</pre><font color=red><cite>(Entry started on Tue Oct 10 00:09:08 2000)</cite></font>
<!-- Author: Pedro -->