<!-- Title: 09:06:31  Tue Jul 22 2003 -->
<!-- Crewchief: Aaron Dominguez -->
<!-- Op1: Pete McNamara -->
<!-- Op2: Kevin Burkett -->
<!-- Op3: Jared Yamaoka -->
<!-- Op4: Steve Worm -->
<!-- Op5: Lauren Tompkins -->
<!-- Op6: &nbsp; -->
<!-- Notes: -->
<pre>Push to close loop on first pass MSSM Higgs 4b analysis</pre>


<!-- Date: Tue Jul 22 09:28:40 2003 -->
<h2>Prescription to build Stntuple in 4.11.2 with SecVtx</h2> 
Use this prescription to make an executable that will produce Stntuples 
for data processed with 4.8.4 and for MC processed with 4.11.2.  
This will run SecVtx in the manner prescribed for <a 
 href="http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/internal/physics/top/RunIIBtag/Offline_Defaults_Summer2003.html">conferences 
in summer 2003</a>.  The compilation and linking process takes 
over 30mins, so start it and then go do something else for a while.<br> 
<br> 
The prescription to run cdfSim, TrgSim++, svtfilter and production will 
follow in a separate entry.<br> 
<br> 
If you are using bash<br> 
<pre>. ~cdfsoft/cdf2.shrc<br>export USESHLIBS=1<br><br></pre> 
or if you are using tcsh<br> 
<pre>source ~cdfsoft/cdf2.cshrc<br>setenv USESHLIBS 1<br><br></pre> 
Then checkout and build<br> 
<pre>newrel -t 4.11.2 dev_240
cd dev_240
addpkg Stntuple dev_240
chmod 755 Stntuple/scripts/build_stntuple
Stntuple/scripts/build_stntuple
gmake Stntuple._prod</pre> 
<p>This prescription will be checked into the Higgs package, as will 
default tcl scripts to run over data and MC. </p>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Jul 29 09:37:29 2003 -->
<h3>Prescription to Checkout Higgs Analysis Package and Compile Stuff</h3> 
I've added the above folks to the cvs permissions file for the Higgs 
package.  This package does not show up in the code browser (which 
is probably for the best anyways).  It has various scripts for 
compiling and running executables, and analysis macros.<br> 
<br> 
To checkout the package and compile the stntuple infrastructure do the 
following:<br> 
<pre>
export USESHLIBS=1

or

setenv USESHLIBS 1

setup cdfsoft2 4.11.2
newrel -t 4.11.2 dev_240
cd dev_240
addpkg -h Higgs
chmod 755 Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple
./Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple
</pre> 
<br> 
This will execute the prescription in the previous log entry to compile 
Stntuple in this test area.  The other directories of this package 
contain other scripts to run production and some analysis 
scripts.  The basic structure is:<br> 
<ul> 
  <li>Higgs/Analyses: Subdirs for each type of MSSM Higgs analysis that 
could be combined into some super-analysis</li> 
  <li>Higgs/Simulation:</li> 
  <ul> 
    <li>Generation: Contains build info to make GRAPPA or run other 
generators for signal/bg</li> 
    <li>Production: Special tcl files for running production exe on the 
output of the Generation phase</li> 
    <li>Validation: Some kind of standard plots to check that things 
aren't fubar</li> 
  </ul> 
</ul> 
Please feel free to add stuff to these areas or make new ones.  We 
should try to all keep using this area to store our common 
tools/analyses so that they can be easily repeated or shared.  
Also, when it comes time, we could tag the area with a name that 
corresponds to some milestone like a blessing or a conference 
talk.  This will allow us to repeat past results more easily.<br> 
<br> 
As of today (July 29, 2003) the only working script in here is really 
the build_stntuple script.  The Atotautau scripts are legacy, but 
could be resurrected.<br>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Aug 12 14;53;13 comment by...Aaron -->
<pre>This prescription should supercede the previous prescription above
since it runs it inside the Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple script.</pre>
<!-- Comment: Fri Aug 15 13;35;46 comment by...Lauren -->
in order to run stnmaker_prod.exe in 4.11.2 i had to comment out a few lines of Phoenix Tracking and SecVtxModule which no longer exist in 4.11.2
<ul>
<li>Stntuple/test/prod/PhoenixMods.tcl
<ul><li>#  maxHadEm set 2.0
<li>#  maxTotalIso set 2.0
</ul>
<li>Stntuple/test/prod/SecVtxModule.tcl
<ul><li>#if { $MC_JOB == "" } { useRefitModule set true<p>
#}  else              { useRefitModule set false }
</ul>
</ul>
<!-- Date: Tue Jul 29 09:50:25 2003 -->
<p>I added a Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb subdir to the Higgs package.<p> 
 
It has example macros that run over the stntuples and make some simple analysis level plots: 
<ul> 
<li> <b>l1.C</b>, L1.hh, L1.cc: Makes plots of L1 quantities for simulation of signal or background 
<li> <b>l3.C</b>, L3.hh, L3.cc: Similar to L1, but can be used a filter for a higher-level analysis macro 
<li> <b>btag.C</b>, BTag.hh, BTag.cc: Example analysis macro for 4b search.  Uses the L3 object as a filter, applies b-tag and other analysis-level requirements, and makes some basic histograms. 
</ul> 
<p>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Jul 29 09:56:50 2003 -->
<p>Here is where we can find <a href="http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/internal/physics/bottom/control/montecarlo/Full_Simulation.html" name="PR">Alex's draft documentation on how to make and run the full chain of realistic simulation</a>.  <p> 
This shows how to run trigsim, svtfilter and production on the output of a generator.<p>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Jul 29 10;00;11 comment by...Aaron -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030><pre>I will try to add something to the Higgs package that does all the magic listed here.</pre></td></tr></td></table>


<!-- Date: Sat Aug 2 15:40:07 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Aug__2_2003_153858.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-2  align='top'></td><td>Copy of first talk on 4b search.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Sat Aug 2 15:43:00 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Aug__2_2003_154245.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-4  align='top'></td><td>Extrapolation of 4b sensitivity hacked together by Aaron and Pete for Orbach presentation.  This assumes that our current signal eff is basically the same as what was estimated by Juan Valls in his RunII workshop report.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Mon Aug 4 17:25:30 2003 -->
<pre>A small talk I gave to the Rutgers group about the background MC stuff I'm working on. 
 
http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~yamaoka/jared_03aug.ps 
 
 
   
</pre>
<!-- Author: Jared -->


<!-- Date: Tue Aug 5 11:09:44 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Aug__5_2003_110923.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-6  align='top'></td><td>Jared's talk</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Wed Aug 6 15:41:38 2003 -->
<pre>The perscription to make Stntuple for 4.11.2 seems to install, but when I run my histogram scripts that work in 4.9.1hpt1 I get this error.  Any thoughts? 
 
 Error in <TUnixSystem::DynamicPathName>: ./shlib/$BFARCH/libJetUser_forRoot.so does not exist in .:/home/cdfsoft/products/root/v3_05_04dKCC_4_0/Linux+2.4/lib:/home/cdfsoft/products/root/v3_05_04dKCC_4_0/Linux+2.4/lib:/home/cdfsoft/products/diskcache_i/v2_02_01KCC_4_0/Linux+2.4/lib:/home/cdfsoft/products/root/v3_05_04dKCC_4_0/Linux+2.4/lib:./shlib/Linux2-KCC_4_0:/home/cdfsoft/dist/releases/4.11.2/shlib/Linux2-KCC_4_0:./lib/Linux2-KCC_4_0:/home/cdfsoft/dist/releases/4.11.2/lib/Linux2-KCC_4_0:.:/home/cdfsoft/products/kai/v4_0f_a/Linux+2.4/KCC_BASE/lib:/home/cdfsoft/products/oracle_client/v8_1_7_lite/Linux+2/lib:/home/cdfsoft/products/dcap/v2_25_f0519/Linux+2.4/lib 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Jared -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Aug 12 14;52;03 comment by...Aaron. -->
<pre>I added the jet corrections library to our macro in the Higgs
package.  Now if you run Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple it will
compile the jet corr stuff and make a link to a new version of
.rootrc that loads this lib when you run root.</pre>




<!-- Date: Mon Aug 18 19:07:16 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Mon_Aug_18_2003_190626.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-8  align='top'></td><td>A small update before tomorrow.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Jared -->


<!-- Date: Tue Aug 19 12:31:29 2003 -->
<pre>I just committed a small change to the analysis macros 
L1.cc, L3.cc and BTag.cc in the Higgs package.  This removes 
the annoying warning message that comes from the version of 
root in 4.11.2 complaining about a missing class def macro 
for classes that inherit from TObject.</pre>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Thu Aug 21 17:34:44 2003 -->
<pre>There is now a driver macro called Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb/incJets.C 
 
This makes a chain of JET20 data that Dmitri T. made and loops 
over them with the L1, L2, L3 and BTag macros. 
 
This could be a starting point to study the trigger. 
 
Note that there is also a chain of JET50 events in this macro if 
you uncomment the first few lines.</pre>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Thu Aug 21 17;35;38 comment by...Aaron -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030><pre>To get this if you've already checked out things using the presciption

cvs update -A Higgs</pre></td></tr></td></table>


<!-- Date: Tue Aug 26 09:37:05 2003 -->
<p> 
<h2>E-mail from Steve Mrenna about why PYTHIA changes the kinematics of GRAPPA events</h2> 
<pre> 
Subject: Re: GRAPPA through Pythia Problem 
Date:    Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:15:41 -0500 
From:    Stephen Mrenna <mrenna@fnal.gov> 
 
Hi, 
 
    I think I see the issue. 
 
    Pythia adds a certain amount of intrinsic transverse momentum to the 
events:  it is a non-perturbative function which must be fit to data. 
Theoretically, it corresponds to soft gluon emission in a region where 
alpha_s is no longer perturbative. 
 
    You will notice that the incoming partons (the gluon pair which has 
a sum pt = 0 in the grappa output) don't have sum pt =0, and the energy 
momentum has to be transferred to the 4 b final state.  This is why the 
energy is not the same. 
 
    Now, I am suspicious of anything you are doing that is very  
sensitive to this effect.  Usually, the intrinsic kt is invoked to  
explain either 
(1) the pt of the Z for pt<5 GeV or so, where the intrinsic kt really 
fixes the peak of the distribution, (2) the pt of photons in photon+jet  
events -- it typically is too hard to be explained by perturbative  
effects alone. 
 
    Is 2% a large effect?  I can't believe that it is, given your  
uncertainty in reconstructing b's (what is the missing Et for example). 
On the other hand, your parton level cuts at the Grappa-level  and the 
way you add on the subsequent parton shower (the choice of scale) should 
be such that you are fairly insensitive to the choice. 
 
    So, the question to you is: 
 
(1) what are your parton level cuts, and how close are they to your  
analysis cuts 
 
(2) what is the scale you use for adding on the subsequent parton shower 
(I am sure that the info is in the grappa format you sent me, but it is  
not obvious -- is it the 14.5081? 
</pre> 
<p> 
<b>So the conclusion is that it is probably not a problem. --Aaron</b>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Sep 2 18:12:47 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Sep__2_2003_181222.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-12  align='top'></td><td>Same as above but with 7000 events</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Jared -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Sep  2 18;16;32 comment by...Jared -->
<pre>Sorry... Should be "same as below"

</pre>
<!-- Date: Tue Sep 2 18:15:09 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Sep__2_2003_181504.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-14  align='top'></td><td>Two plots to help Aaron check cdfSim(etc). Plot 1 SumEt of the 4 b's Plot 2 SumEt(x-axis) vs Et of highest Et b</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Jared -->



<!-- Date: Thu Sep 4 16:26:18 2003 -->
<h2>HOWTO Compile and Run STNTUPLE Analysis Macros</h2> 
Follow the presciption <a href=http://www-cdfonline.fnal.gov/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=copyentry&page=1&time=09:37:29>above</a> to build the release.  Then make sure you are in the base directory, dev_240, and do the following: 
<pre> 
export USESHLIBS=1 
. ~cdfsoft/cdf2.shrc 
setup cdfsoft2 4.11.2 
ln -s Stntuple/scripts/.rootrc . 
ln -s Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb/*.hh . 
ln -s Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb/*.cc . 
ln -s Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb/*.C . 
</pre> 
then, for example 
<pre> 
root 
.x btag.C 
</pre>  
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Fri Sep 5 15:54:12 2003 -->
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=5> 
<tr> 
<h1 align=center>Trigger Bits of Interest for Multi Jet Higgs Physics Table PHYSICS_1_05_v-8</h1> 
<center> 
<h3 align=center>L1 bit map</h3> 
<table border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1 align=center> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<th align=center>Bit #</th><th align=center>Level 1 versioned trigger (# of occurences in table)</th></tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>19</td><td align=left>L1_TWO_TRK2_PS200_v-3 (2)</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>20</td><td align=left>L1_JET10_v-1 (13)</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>22</td><td align=left>L1_TWO_TRK2_&_JET10_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>27</td><td align=left>L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
</table><p> </p> 
<h3 align=center>L2 bit map</h3> 
<table border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1 align=center> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<th align=center>Bit #</th><th align=center>Level 2 versioned trigger (# of occurences in table)</th></tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>47</td><td align=left>L2_FOUR_JET15_SUMET125_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>70</td><td align=left>L2_PS1K_L1_JET10_v-1 (2)</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>73</td><td align=left>L2_PS1K_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>113</td><td align=left>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_&_THREE_JET10_SUMET105_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>114</td><td align=left>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>115</td><td align=left>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_PS10_v-1</td> 
</tr> 
</tr> 
</table><p> </p> 
<h3 align=center>Paths bit map</h3> 
<table border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1 align=center> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<th align=center>Bit #</th><th align=center>Trigger Path</th><th align=center>Trigger Dataset</th></tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>11</td><td align=left>B_HAD_L3TAG_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-6</td> 
<td align=left>B_BACKUP_1_v-3</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>12</td><td align=left>B_HAD_L3TAG_L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-5</td> 
<td align=left>B_BACKUP_1_v-3</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>85</td><td align=left>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-4</td> 
<td align=left>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_1_v-3</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>94</td><td align=left>JET_CAL_SINGLETOWER_10_v-2</td> 
<td align=left>JET_ST_1_v-2</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>167</td><td align=left>TEST_HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-2</td> 
<td align=left>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_1_v-3</td> 
</tr> 
<tr bgcolor=white> 
<td align=right>171</td><td align=left>TOP_MULTI_JET_v-4</td> 
<td align=left>SUMET_1_v-3</td> 
</tr> 
</table><p> </p> 
<h3>Trigger Level Drives</h3> 
<table border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1 align=center> 
<tr> 
<td align=left bgcolor=white> 
<ol> 
<li>L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1/[27]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1/[114]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_THREE_JET10_SUMET100_TWO_SVT_v-2</li> 
<ul> 
<li>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-4</li> 
<ul> 
<li>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_1_v-3</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
<li>L1_JET10_v-1/[20(13)]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L2_FOUR_JET15_SUMET125_v-1/[47]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_FOUR_JET10_v-2</li> 
<ul> 
<li>TOP_MULTI_JET_v-4</li> 
<ul> 
<li>SUMET_1_v-3</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
<li>L2_PS1K_L1_JET10_v-1/[70(2)]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_NULL_v-1</li> 
<ul> 
<li>JET_CAL_SINGLETOWER_10_v-2</li> 
<ul> 
<li>JET_ST_1_v-2</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
<li>L1_TWO_TRK2_&_JET10_v-1/[22]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_&_THREE_JET10_SUMET105_v-1/[113]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_TEST_THREE_JET10_SUMET100_TWO_SVT_v-2</li> 
<ul> 
<li>TEST_HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-2</li> 
<ul> 
<li>HIGGS_MULTI_JET_1_v-3</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
<li>L1_TWO_TRK2_PS200_v-3/[19(2)]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L2_PS1K_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-1/[73]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_NULL_v-1</li> 
<ul> 
<li>B_HAD_L3TAG_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-6</li> 
<ul> 
<li>B_BACKUP_1_v-3</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
<li>L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_PS10_v-1/[115]</li> 
<ul> 
<li>L3_NULL_v-1</li> 
<ul> 
<li>B_HAD_L3TAG_L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-5</li> 
<ul> 
<li>B_BACKUP_1_v-3</li> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ul> 
</ol> 
</td> 
</tr> 
</table><p> </p> 
<h3 align=center>Physics table</h3> 
<p><table border=2 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1 align=center> 
<tr><td align=left bgcolor=white> 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Physics Table</strong> PHYSICS_1_05_v-8 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Dataset</strong> B_BACKUP_1_v-3 
B_BACKUP/StreamH 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> B_HAD_L3TAG_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-6 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_PS200_v-3 
 Bit: [19(2)] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_PRESCALE_200_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of PRESCALE. 
<ol> 
<li>PRESCALE_FACTOR = 200 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK. 
<ol> 
<li>XFT_LAYERS = 4   
<li>XFT_PT2 = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MIN = 0 degrees 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MAX = 180 degrees 
<li>PT_SCALAR_SUM = 0 GeV/c 
<li>XFT_PT = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>CHARGE_PRODUCT = 0   
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK): 
<ol> 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 18 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 3 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 47 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_PS1K_L1_TWO_TRK2_v-1 
 Bit: [73] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_AUTO_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of L2_AUTO. 
<ol> 
<li>DUMMY_PARAMETER = 1 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_PRESCALE_1,000_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of L2_PRESCALE. 
<ol> 
<li>L2_PRESCALE_FACTOR = 1000 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_NULL_v-1 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> B_HAD_L3TAG_L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-5 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_PS200_v-3 
 Bit: [19(2)] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_PRESCALE_200_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of PRESCALE. 
<ol> 
<li>PRESCALE_FACTOR = 200 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK. 
<ol> 
<li>XFT_LAYERS = 4   
<li>XFT_PT2 = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MIN = 0 degrees 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MAX = 180 degrees 
<li>PT_SCALAR_SUM = 0 GeV/c 
<li>XFT_PT = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>CHARGE_PRODUCT = 0   
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK): 
<ol> 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 18 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 3 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 47 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_PS10_v-1 
 Bit: [115] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_PRESCALE_10_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of L2_PRESCALE. 
<ol> 
<li>L2_PRESCALE_FACTOR = 10 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of SvtTrack. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 2   
<li>SVT_DMIN = 100 microns 
<li>SVT_PT = 2 GeV/c 
<li>SVT_DMAX = 1000 microns 
<li>SVT_CHI2 = 25   
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_NULL_v-1 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Dataset</strong> HIGGS_MULTI_JET_1_v-3 
HIGGS_MULTI_JET/StreamE 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-4 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1 
 Bit: [27] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of JET. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 1   
<li>ET_CENTRAL = 10 GeV 
<li>ET_PLUG = 10 GeV 
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of JET): 
<ol> 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_CONTENT = 1 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_WIRE_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_MEMORY_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 28 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 5 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 9 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_SUMET90_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of SUMET. 
<ol> 
<li>ET = 90 GeV 
<li>SUMET_THRESH_CENTRAL = 1 GeV 
<li>SUMET_THRESH_PLUG = 1 GeV 
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of SUMET): 
<ol> 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 29 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 0 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 0 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1 
 Bit: [114] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of SvtTrack. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 2   
<li>SVT_DMIN = 100 microns 
<li>SVT_PT = 2 GeV/c 
<li>SVT_DMAX = 1000 microns 
<li>SVT_CHI2 = 25   
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_THREE_JET10_SUMET100_TWO_SVT_v-2 
<ol> 
<li><strong>L3 Instance:</strong> jetHiggs_v1, of <strong>class</strong> L3JetFilterModule_v-1 
<ol> 
<li>RcpJetCloneName = cone0.4</li> 
<li>jetAlgorithm = JetClu</li> 
<li>jetFilterType = 2</li> 
<li>minimumJetEtForSumEt = 10.0</li> 
<li>sumEtCut = 100</li> 
<li>sumEtNjetCut = 3</li> 
</ol> 
</li> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> TEST_HIGGS_MULTI_JET_v-2 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_&_JET10_v-1 
 Bit: [22] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of JET. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 1   
<li>ET_CENTRAL = 10 GeV 
<li>ET_PLUG = 10 GeV 
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of JET): 
<ol> 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_CONTENT = 1 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_WIRE_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_MEMORY_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 22 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 5 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 9 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_TWO_TRK2_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK. 
<ol> 
<li>XFT_LAYERS = 4   
<li>XFT_PT2 = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MIN = 0 degrees 
<li>DELTA_PHI6_MAX = 180 degrees 
<li>PT_SCALAR_SUM = 0 GeV/c 
<li>XFT_PT = 2.04 GeV/c 
<li>CHARGE_PRODUCT = 0   
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of TWO_TRACK): 
<ol> 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 18 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 3 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 47 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_&_THREE_JET10_SUMET105_v-1 
 Bit: [113] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_THREE_JET10_SUMET105_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of ClusterSum. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 3   
<li>ET = 10 GeV 
<li>ET_TOTAL = 105 GeV 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_TWO_TRK2_D100_v-2 
<strong>Instance</strong> of SvtTrack. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 2   
<li>SVT_DMIN = 100 microns 
<li>SVT_PT = 2 GeV/c 
<li>SVT_DMAX = 1000 microns 
<li>SVT_CHI2 = 25   
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_TEST_THREE_JET10_SUMET100_TWO_SVT_v-2 
<ol> 
<li><strong>L3 Instance:</strong> cot2svtDefault_v2, of <strong>class</strong> Cot2SvtMatchingModule_v-2 
<ol> 
<li>output = Cot2SvtMatchedTracks</li> 
</ol> 
</li> 
<li><strong>L3 Instance:</strong> threeJet10SumEt100_v2, of <strong>class</strong> L3JetFilterModule_v-1 
<ol> 
<li>RcpJetCloneName = cone0.4</li> 
<li>jetAlgorithm = JetClu</li> 
<li>jetFilterType = 2</li> 
<li>minimumJetEtForSumEt = 10</li> 
<li>sumEtCut = 100</li> 
<li>sumEtNjetCut = 3</li> 
</ol> 
</li> 
<li><strong>L3 Instance:</strong> twoDisp100Track2_v5, of <strong>class</strong> L3TrackFilterModule_v-5 
<ol> 
<li>d0Max = 0.100</li> 
<li>d0Min = 0.010</li> 
<li>eta = 1.2</li> 
<li>fitType = 2</li> 
<li>inputMatches = Cot2SvtMatchedTracks</li> 
<li>nTracks = 2</li> 
<li>pt = 2.0</li> 
</ol> 
</li> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Dataset</strong> JET_ST_1_v-2 
JET_ST/StreamG 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> JET_CAL_SINGLETOWER_10_v-2 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
 Bit: [20(13)] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of JET. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 1   
<li>ET_CENTRAL = 10 GeV 
<li>ET_PLUG = 10 GeV 
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of JET): 
<ol> 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_CONTENT = 1 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_WIRE_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_MEMORY_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 22 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 5 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 9 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_PS1K_L1_JET10_v-1 
 Bit: [70(2)] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_AUTO_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of L2_AUTO. 
<ol> 
<li>DUMMY_PARAMETER = 1 integer 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_PRESCALE_1,000_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of L2_PRESCALE. 
<ol> 
<li>L2_PRESCALE_FACTOR = 1000 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_NULL_v-1 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Dataset</strong> SUMET_1_v-3 
SUMET/StreamG 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Path</strong> TOP_MULTI_JET_v-4 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
 Bit: [20(13)] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L1_JET10_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of JET. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 1   
<li>ET_CENTRAL = 10 GeV 
<li>ET_PLUG = 10 GeV 
</ol> 
<strong>Generated Down Load</strong> (<strong>Instance</strong> of JET): 
<ol> 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_CONTENT = 1 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_CRATESUM_WIRE_NO = 5 integer 
<li>DIRAC_MEMORY_BIT_NO = 5 integer 
<li>FRED_INPUT_BIT = 22 integer 
<li>PREFRED_INPUT_BIT = 5 integer 
<li>PREFRED_OUTPUT_BIT = 9 integer 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L2_FOUR_JET15_SUMET125_v-1 
 Bit: [47] 
<ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> DCAS_JET_3_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of DCAS_JET. 
<ol> 
<li>DCAS_JET_CENTRAL_SEED = 3 GeV 
<li>DCAS_JET_CENTRAL_SHOULDER = 1 GeV 
<li>DCAS_JET_FORWARD_SEED = 3 GeV 
<li>DCAS_JET_FORWARD_SHOULDER = 1 GeV 
<li>DCAS_JET_PLUG_SEED = 3 GeV 
<li>DCAS_JET_PLUG_SHOULDER = 1 GeV 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Specific option</strong> L2_FOUR_JET15_SUMET125_v-1 
<strong>Instance</strong> of ClusterSum. 
<ol> 
<li>NUMBER = 4   
<li>ET_TOTAL = 125 GeV 
<li>ET = 15 GeV 
</ol> 
</ol> 
<li><strong>Trigger</strong> L3_FOUR_JET10_v-2 
<ol> 
<li><strong>L3 Instance:</strong> jetTop_v1, of <strong>class</strong> L3JetFilterModule_v-1 
<ol> 
<li>RcpJetCloneName = cone0.4</li> 
<li>jetAlgorithm = JetClu</li> 
<li>jetFilterType = 2</li> 
<li>minimumJetEtForSumEt = 10</li> 
<li>sumEtCut = 0</li> 
<li>sumEtNjetCut = 4</li> 
</ol> 
</li> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</ol> 
</td></tr></table></p></center>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Mon Sep 8 10:54:56 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Mon_Sep__8_2003_105426.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-16  align='top'></td><td>New L1 simulation of L1_JET10_&_SUMET90_v-1.  SumEt cut doesn't seem to be 90GeV.  Also, the jet energy is not from the TC1D bank, but from the TC2D bank, but nevertheless, it seems wrong too.  Maybe we still can't use trigsim for this L1 trigger?</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Mon Sep 8 11:44:12 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Mon_Sep__8_2003_114351.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-18  align='top'></td><td>Looking at 100 data events that passed the L1_JET10_&_SUMET90 trigger from the TL1D and TC2D banks, things look reasonable.  So, somehow the problem must be either what is stored in the simulated trigger banks, or how TRGSim++ is making its decision.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Sep  9 16;45;10 comment by...Aaron -->
<pre>I just checked this L1 trigger in run 151435, and everything is ok there too.  Whew.  So it really looks like a simulation problem.</pre>


<!-- Date: Fri Sep 12 14:05:13 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Fri_Sep_12_2003_140459.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-20  align='top'></td><td>Thanks to Simona and Carla, two bugs were fixed in the TRGSim++ modules. 1) The sumEt thresholds were not being loaded and was always 2 GeV, 2) The tower thresholds were not being loaded unless the run number was set by hand in TRGSim even though a realistic run number existed in the event record.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Fri Sep 12 14:07:25 2003 -->
<p>To get bug fixes to TRGSim++ so that the L1_JET10_&_SUMET90 trigger is properly simulated, add the following package and rebuild TRGSim++ 
<pre> 
addpkg TriggerMods 
addpkg CalTrigger PreFred_091103 
gmake nobin 
gmake TriggerMods.bin 
</pre> 
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Sep 16 11:03:07 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Sep_16_2003_110258.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-22  align='top'></td><td>L1 Trigger rate in good runs from in physics trigger table 2</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Sep 16 14:35:11 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Sep_16_2003_143419.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-24  align='top'></td><td>Plot1: SumEt of 4b's with generator level SumEt > 50GeV cut Plot2: SumEt of 4b's with L3 cut.  Since the events aren't fully simulated 'L3' is SumEt*0.8 > 100 GeV and two b's who's Et*0.8 > 10GeV    </a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Jared -->


<!-- Date: Mon Sep 22 09:08:46 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Mon_Sep_22_2003_090831.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-26  align='top'></td><td>Aaron's 4b update talk at Higgs meeting on 17 Sept 03.  Includes some trigger cross section plots.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Tue Oct 14 14:08:04 2003 -->
<html> 
I've created a <a href = "http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/internal/people/links/LaurenTompkins/tomakentuple.html"> webpage</a> that gives instructions on how to make sucessful STNtuples on the CAF.  I'll update it as we change tcl files, etc. 
</html>
<!-- Author: Lauren -->


<!-- Date: Tue Oct 14 14:13:30 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Oct_14_2003_141307.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-28  align='top'></td><td>Plots of Tony Munar's Monte Carlo and Et of jets in HIGGS_MULTI_JET data.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Lauren  -->


<!-- Date: Tue Oct 21 12:11:58 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Tue_Oct_21_2003_121125.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-30  align='top'></td><td>Pt of jets with more than one parton with delR<0.2.  This is a plot of BBPP MC with a parton level cut each parton pt>15 GeV.  Shows sculpting around 30 GeV.  </a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Jared -->


<!-- Date: Tue Nov 4 10:50:17 2003 -->
<h2>Update to Prescription to Checkout Higgs Analysis Package and Compile Stuff in 4.11.2</h2> 
Carsten found some inconsistencies in the way we were running SecVtx in the stntuple maker as compared to the blessed prescription from the b-tag group.  There were two main differences. 
<ol> 
<li>Standalone tracks were used in the ZVertex finder, leading to differences in the primary vertex and jet reference points. 
<li>Tracks were not being refit in MC, leading to large differences. 
</ol> 
This has been fixed dev_240a of stntuple.  Use the following prescription to make a fresh release of stntuple: 
<pre> 
. ~cdfsoft/cdf2.shrc 
export USESHLIBS=1 
 
or 
 
source ~cdfsoft/cdf2.cshrc 
setenv USESHLIBS 1 
 
then 
 
newrel -t 4.11.2 dev_240a 
cd dev_240a 
addpkg -h Higgs 
chmod 755 Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple 
Higgs/Analyses/build_stntuple
</pre> 
Then go get a cup of coffee, since it will take a little while...<p>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Tue Jun  1 16;57;56 comment by...Aaron -->
<pre>Use dev_240b with 4.11.2</pre>
<!-- Date: Wed Nov 5 14:03:58 2003 -->
<h3>Jobs hanging/dying on the CAF from ConfigManager</h3> 
There have been reports from many people, like Lauren, that jobs on the CAF compiled under 4.11.2 will hang and then die due to some database issue with ConfigManager.<p> 
Since we use ConfigManager to select good runs, I've put a workaround in the repository.<p> 
Higgs/Analyses/bbAtobbbb/goodrun_4b.tcl can be sourced from inside the DHInput talk-to, instead of using ConfigManager.<p>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Thu Nov 6 12:27:26 2003 -->
<center><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Thu_Nov__6_2003_122540.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-32' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Thu_Nov__6_2003_122602.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-34' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Thu_Nov__6_2003_122615.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-36' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Thu_Nov__6_2003_122624.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-38' ></a></center>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Thu Nov  6 12;30;05 comment by...Aaron -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030>Predicted and observed tag rates in inclusive jet data.  The single tag positive and negative rates show good agreement.  But the double tag rates where you require a pos or neg tag and then look at all taggable away jets for a negative tag shows a horrible peak in the observed distribution at ~5 radians.</td></tr></td></table>


<!-- Date: Wed Nov 12 10:56:07 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Wed_Nov_12_2003_105550.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-40  align='top'></td><td>Copy of talk on Fake Tags in 4b analysis given by Aaron at Higgs meeting in October.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->


<!-- Date: Wed Nov 12 11:02:11 2003 -->
<center><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Wed_Nov_12_2003_105757.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-42' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Wed_Nov_12_2003_105839.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-46' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Wed_Nov_12_2003_105822.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-44' ></a><a href='/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Wed_Nov_12_2003_110127.ps'><img src='/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-50' ></a></center>
<!-- Author: Aaron -->
<!-- Comment: Wed Nov 12 11;07;39 comment by...Aaron -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030>The bad phi behavior of the doubletags was due to two bad runs which had beamline history 17 instead of 19.  There were so many doubletags coming from these two runs (~200pb^-1) that it was screwing everything up.<p>
These runs were included in the mistag matrix used for the winter '03, and apparently also for the top lep+jets analysis too.<p>
Apparently, this was discovered by Karen Gibson in Sept, (<a href=http://www-cdfonline.fnal.gov/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=beamline&action=view&page=4&frame=2&anchor=15:07:23>see beamline e-log</a>), but it hasn't been fixed yet.<p></td></tr></td></table>


<!-- Date: Sat Nov 22 18:45:48 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Nov_22_2003_184526.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-52  align='top'></td><td>Pete bbbb status report -- march 19</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Pete -->


<!-- Date: Sat Nov 22 18:48:32 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Nov_22_2003_184818.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-54  align='top'></td><td>Pete status report - april 2</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Pete -->


<!-- Date: Sat Nov 22 18:58:24 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Nov_22_2003_185815.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-56  align='top'></td><td>Standard Sensitivity Plot</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Pete -->


<!-- Date: Sat Nov 22 19:09:33 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Nov_22_2003_190925.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-58  align='top'></td><td>Log Sensitivity Plot</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Pete -->


<!-- Date: Sat Nov 22 19:11:38 2003 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Sat_Nov_22_2003_191133.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-60  align='top'></td><td>Log sensitivity plot</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Pete -->


<!-- Date: Thu Jan 15 13:41:16 2004 -->
<pre> 
Here are the locations of what I have so far (on hexfm1.rutgers.edu): 
 
bg (GRAPPA w/ 50 GeV SumEt cut) 
/scr2/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (100k) 
/scr4/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (175K) 
/scr5/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (100k) 
/scr7/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (100k) 
 
sig (Pythia no cuts) 
/scr7/yamaoka/bbbb_sig_pyth_stntuple/bbbb_sig_90_pyth_####_prod_stn.root (mA=90) 
/scr8/yamaoka/bbbb_sig_pyth_stntuple/bbbb_sig_##_pyth_####_prod_stn.root (mA=120, 150, 180.  Will be done Jan 16, 04) 
 
 
</pre>
<!-- Author: Jared -->
<!-- Comment: Thu Jan 15 13;43;23 comment by...Jared -->
<pre>Should be:

/scr2/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (100k) 
/scr4/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (105K) 
/scr7/yamaoka/re_bbbb_bg_stntuple/bbbb_bg_####_prod_stn.root (250k) 
</pre>


<!-- Date: Fri Jan 16 15:23:39 2004 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/mssm_higgs/Fri_Jan_16_2004_152324.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/det-system-elog.pl?nb=mssm_higgs&action=view&page=-62  align='top'></a></td><td>Preliminary plots of applying mistag matrix to the multi-jet data.  The mistag matrix was created without the entire dataset, so we will update everything when the rest of the jet data is finished.</td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Lauren -->