**SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR STANDARD FORM 83-1**

**REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS**

**FOR THE ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING**

**THE SALE AND USE OF AFTERMARKET CATALYTIC CONVERTERS**

**PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT**

1\. [IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION]{.underline}

1(a) Title of the Information Collection

Enforcement Policy Regarding the Sale and Use of Aftermarket Catalytic
Converters (Renewal). 51 [FR]{.underline} 28114-28119, 28133 (Aug. 5,
1986); 52 [FR]{.underline} 42144 (Nov. 3, 1987), 67 [FR]{.underline}
319-320 (Jan. 3, 2002).

OMB No. 2060-0135; EPA ICR No. 1292.07.

1(b) Short Characterization

The aftermarket catalytic converter policy (51 Fed. Reg. 28114-28119,
28113 (Aug. 5, 1986); 52 Fed. Reg. 42144 (Nov. 3, 1987)) allows
aftermarket automobile catalytic converter manufacturers and
reconditioners to compete with the automobile manufacturers for the
aftermarket catalytic converter replacement market. Without this policy,
it would be illegal, under section 203 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §
7522, to sell or install aftermarket catalytic converters that do not
conform exactly to the automobile manufacturers' original equipment (OE)
versions of these parts. The policy also makes it possible for
automobile repair shops, which are often small businesses, to take on a
significant share of the aftermarket catalyst replacement market. In
doing so, consumers are able to purchase replacement catalytic
converters (converters) at a much lower price than they would pay for an
OE converter. This helps to ensure that vehicles will not create
excessive air pollution because motorists are more likely to replace
damaged catalytic converters if they cost much less than OE converters
(cost savings resulting from the policy are estimated to be about \$680
million in 2005 dollars).

However, to ensure that air quality will not be compromised, it was
necessary to set standards for aftermarket catalytic converters, both
for performance and durability. It was also necessary to ensure that
appropriate applications are installed on vehicles (i.e., the converter
has to be of a type and size appropriate for the vehicle application).
To these ends, the following recordkeeping and reporting requirements
exist for aftermarket converter manufacturers, reconditioners and
installers:

[Manufacturers]{.underline}: On a one-time basis for each type or line
of converter manufactured, the manufacturer must report information
identifying the supplier, and information regarding the physical
specifications of each catalytic converter line produced, and
information regarding pre-production testing of the converters that show
they meet standards for certain specified vehicle applications (a single
converter line can be used on a large number of vehicle applications).
The original policy required that once production had begun the
manufacturer would submit to EPA on a semi-annual basis the number of
each type of catalyst manufactured and a summary of information
contained on warranty cards or, at the option of the respondent, copies
of warranty cards for all converters sold. This reporting regarding
sales and warranty information was eliminated in March 1999, with the
stipulation that records must be maintained and the information
submitted to EPA upon request.

[Reconditioners]{.underline}: On a one-time basis, the catalyst
reconditioner must report the identity of the company and a description
of the test bench used for testing used catalytic converters and the
intended vehicle application(s) for each converter type. All used
converters must be tested individually to ensure they are still
functional. On a semi-annual basis, the catalyst reconditioner must
report the names and addresses of distributors along with the number of
each type of converter sold to each distributor. This reporting
requirement was also eliminated in March 1999, with the stipulation that
records must be maintained and the information submitted to EPA upon
request.

[Installers of aftermarket converters]{.underline}: Installers have no
reporting requirements. They simply fill out the warranty card and hand
it to the retail customer. They must also include a brief statement with
each invoice stating the need for replacing the original converter. They
also tag each removed converter with a reference to the invoice for
repair. The invoices are required to be kept for 6 months. The tagged
converters are required to be kept for 15 days.

2\. [NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION]{.underline}

2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

Section 203(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act (Act) prohibits removal or
rendering inoperative of motor vehicle emission control equipment by
commercial service establishments or any other person. It also prohibits
the causing of such acts. In addition, it prohibits the manufacture,
sale or installation of devices that defeat the emission control
components or design elements. The catalytic converter is the major
emission control device used by motor vehicle manufacturers. Oxidation
(two-way) catalytic converters reduce hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
emissions, while oxidation-reduction (three-way) converters (widely used
since 1981) additionally reduce oxides of nitrogen emissions. If a
vehicle is properly maintained, the catalytic converter frequently will
not require replacement for the life of the vehicle. However, catalytic
converters sometimes need replacement subsequent to the automobile
manufacturer emissions control warranty period, and therefore any
replacement cost is paid for by the vehicle owner.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has promoted vehicle
emissions inspection programs which require converter replacement where
missing or non-functioning converters are discovered. The EPA believes
that the success of State and local government programs of this type
depends, in part, on the availability and cost of replacement
converters. The average cost of a new original equipment manufacturer
(OE) converter is approxi­mately \$540-\$650 installed. This high cost of
replacement severely limited their installation after the warranty
period expired. This enforcement policy allows the sale of low-cost
effective alternatives to the OE converters. For the aftermarket
converter industry, including the installers, this is a multimillion
dollar industry. Over 2,000,000 aftermarket converters are installed
each year.

The popularity of these low-cost replacement converters and the need to
ensure air quality benefits while promoting local tampering inspection
programs have led the Agency to implement this policy for the
manufacture, sale, and installation of new non-OE and used,
reconditioned OE converters. Prior to the implementation of the policy,
aftermarket converter manufacturers and reconditioners were frequently
selling catalysts that had little, if any, efficacy. Manufacturers who
were attempting to make a quality product were not able to compete on a
level playing field because muffler shops could purchase poor quality
converters for half the price of better aftermarket converters and
undersell the competition. The manufacturer reporting and recordkeeping
requirements help ensure that proper equipment is manufactured and
distributed to installers and helps ensure proper retail level
installation of converters.

The installer requirements exist to enable EPA to monitor whether
correct applications are made at the retail level and whether OE
converters are being replaced with aftermarket converters only in
appropriate circumstances (*e.g.*, the original equipment converter
should not be replaced with an aftermarket converter while the vehicle
is still under its emissions warranty). A strong incentive exists for
cheating; for example installing a used, untested converter would cost
less than half the price of a properly tested converter.

These are important conditions to the installation of aftermarket or
reconditioned catalytic converters. An improper application (*e.g.*, a
2-way converter on a vehicle that needs a 3-way converter) will result
in much higher emissions of harmful pollutants than a proper application
would. Likewise, replacement of the original converter when the repair
is not needed can result in an increase in emissions since working OE
converters are more efficient than aftermarket converters.

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

USE

The collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including that the information collected
will have practical utility. Without these requirements, enforcement
would be nearly impossible. Neither EPA nor a reconditioner can
determine whether a used converter is effective by conducting a visual
inspection of the converter. The efficacy of new aftermarket converters
for particular vehicle applications cannot be determined without
prototype testing and information on specifications.

All testing is to be conducted by the manufacturer or reconditioners,
and therefore the Agency believes that it is important that it have
access to testing records. A record of the names and addresses of
dealers and distributors, as is required in the policy, allows for
prompt notification of these parties in the event of such an enforcement
action.

The primary use of the sales and warranty card information is for direct
compliance action. Warranty cards often reveal direct evidence of
misapplication or defect warranty violations. Sales information from
recon­ditioners provides an indirect way to make sure that production is
not exceeding the capacity of the test stand, and provides the Agency
with a list of distributor or retail facilities for enforcement audits
and testing.

The installer requirements are needed to assure installation of
appropriate applications and to assure that catalytic converters are
only replaced when necessary. Some repair shops could gain an unfair
advantage if they were to install cheaper 2-way converters on vehicles
requiring 3-way converters. Repair shops could also improperly benefit,
at cost to both the consumer and ambient air quality, if OE converters
are replaced when they are still functional or when they are still
within the warranty period.

The requirements also facilitate knowledge on the part of the installers
of aftermarket converters and of the driving public that the converters
they are using are appropriate and effective and that no potential
liability should exist for the installer so long as the appropriate
converter is installed on each vehicle.

USERS

Air Enforcement Division, Office of Civil Enforcement, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. As noted above, the requirements also assist industry by
assuring a level playing field and by ensuring installers and their
customers that the converter to be installed is effective and
appropriate for the vehicle (*e.g.*, 3-way converter of proper capacity
on vehicle that needs 3-way).

3\. [NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION
CRITERIA]{.underline}

3(a) Nonduplication

The information collection is not unnecessarily duplicative of
information otherwise reasonably accessible to the Agency. The required
warranty provisions and the manufacturer reports and test records are
the only records of their kind available to document the information
needed to determine compliance. The information can be in a variety of
formats and the manufacturers' warranty card information reporting can
be electronic or the manufacturer can submit the actual warranty cards.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, a public comment period
of 60 days was announced in the Federal Register (70 Fed. Reg. 30941-43
(May 31, 2005)) regarding this proposed renewal ICR. No comments were
received. However, we have continued to update burden and cost
information and this ICR Supporting Statement, the associated Form 83-I
and the second Federal Register notice reflect these changes.

The ICR estimated burdens and costs that are being submitted to OMB for
this renewal have been revised and updated to reflect wage and inflation
increases, as well as estimated current workloads and corresponding
burden times for installers, reconditioners and manufacturers. An
additional estimate has been continued in this ICR regarding amortized
startup costs for new aftermarket converter installation businesses. A
second Federal Register notice is being published announcing the
submission of this Policy to OMB for approval.

3(c) Consultations

For this ICR, EPA has contacted various affected industry respondents
for information regarding burdens and costs. Following is a list of
non-EPA contacts, by name, phone number and affiliation:

1\. Peter Nitoglia, Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. 865.458.4681.

2\. George Schafer, Eastern manufacturing, Inc.,800-533-7199.

3\. Pat Haynes, Tenneco automotive, 517.796.6744.

4\. Dave Miller, Miller Catalyzer, 510.732.0622.

5\. Paula Couch, Brown Recycling, 800.367.9271.

6\. Helamon Andre, KGC Warehouse, 417.276.3059.

7\. Harley Mayer, Jr., Kataco Creek Converters, 800.275.5116.

8\. Jim/Mark Zuckerman, Meineke Muffler, New Haven, CT. 203.397.2353

9\. Katie, Midas Muffler, Beaverton, OR., 503.643.5561

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The information requested from the manufacturers would normally by kept
as part of their records, and should not constitute a significant burden
to maintain. Additionally, the infor­mation requested is the minimum
considered necessary to adequately monitor the aftermarket converter
market and properly enforce the policy. Note that the manufacturers and
reconditioners are voluntarily accepting recordkeeping burdens as a
condition of EPA not bringing actions for violation of section 203 of
the Clean Air Act. EPA is willing to allow the sale of aftermarket
converters not certified to meet OE standards only if it can insure that
aftermarket converters meet the less strict standards of the policy and
that they are properly installed.

The product development information requested is only collected when a
new product line is introduced by an after­market converter manufacturer.
Less frequent collection of test results would allow some converters to
reach the market without proof of sufficient emission testing to verify
their effectiveness. Semi-annual reports of production or sales
information are no longer required. ­Test data on used converters cannot
be taken on less than every converter that is recycled, since the
condition of the used converters varies widely because of prior use
history.

No reporting is required for installers. The recordkeeping must
accompany installation since there is no way to collect the information
afterward.

3(e) General Guidelines

The collection is in compliance with OMB guidelines except that new
aftermarket converter manufacturers are required to keep warranty cards
for 5 years. Because the warranty period for the converters is 5 years,
this length of time is necessary. This requirement is also in line with
the applicable statute of limitations. EPA has not received negative
comment regarding this maintenance period from the industry.

3(f) Confidentiality

Confidentiality protections are provided pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 2.201
*et seq.*

3(g) Sensitive Questions

This section is inapplicable to this ICR.

4\. [THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED]{.underline}

4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes

Respondents include the manufacturers of new aftermarket motor vehicle
catalytic converters and reconditioners of used aftermarket converters.
The SIC code is 346 (NAICS 336399). The other respondents are automobile
exhaust repair facilities. Their SIC code is 7533 (NAICS 811112).

4(b) Information Requested

\(i\) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements

This ICR indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time
persons are required to maintain the records specified.

[One-time Reporting]{.underline}:

Parties required to submit converter testing information include all
manufacturers of new non-OEM converters and reconditioners of used OEM
converters.

[Manufacturers of New Converters\--Specifications
Information]{.underline}:

1\) Converter supplier and address.

2\) General type of converter (e.g., oxidation, reduction, three-way,
etc.).

3\) Number of each type of catalyst used per can (number of individual
monoliths containing catalytic metals in each unit).

4\) Substrate (e.g., monolithic, pelleted) - give configuration
construction technique (e.g., extruded, laid-up, formed, etc.),
composition, supplier and address, composition of active con­stituents in
substrate (grams or troy ounces); for monolithic substrates, give number
of cells per square inch of frontal area, design tolerances, and nominal
cell wall thickness (in mils); for pelleted substrates, specify pellet
shape and dimensions, pellet bulk density, the use of more than one type
of pellet (e.g., Rh, or Pt/Pd), any geometrical distribution of pellets,
and (if this is controlled in production) the mean impregnation depth
(in microns) of active materials with production tolerances.

5\) Washcoat - give composition of active constituents, and total active
material loading (grams or troy­ ounces) in washcoat.

6\) Active material - give composition of active constituents, loading
of each active material including design tolerances, and total active
material loading including design tolerances (grams or troy-ounces).

7\) Container - specify dimensions, volume, materials used, technique of
containment and restraint, method of constructing container, canner (if
different from catalyst supplier), and insulation and shielding
(converter and/or vehicle).

8\) Physical description - dimensions (e.g., length, width, height,
etc.), weight (lbs.), volume including design tolerances, active surface
area (BET), and total active surface area including design tolerances.

\_\_[New converter manufacturers Prototype Testing]{.underline}:

1\) Year, make, and model of vehicles tested.

2\) Method of mileage accumulation.

3\) Name and address of testing facility.

4\) Summary of conversion efficiency test results.

5\) Intended vehicle applications for each converter type tested.

\_\_[Reconditioners of Catalytic Converters\--Information on Test
Bench]{.underline}:

1\) Name and address of testing facility.

2\) Description of facilities used for testing.

3\) Intended vehicle applications for each converter type.

[Periodic Reporting]{.underline}:

\_\_[Manufacturers]{.underline}:

Manufacturers are no longer required to submit the following information
on a semi-annual basis; EPA reserves the right to require information
upon request:

1\) The number of each type of converter manufactured.

2\) A summary of the information contained on the warranty cards
received, or copies of the actual warranty cards.

\_[Reconditioners]{.underline}:

Reconditioners are no longer required to submit names and addresses of
the persons or companies to whom the remanufacturer distributes, along
with the number of each type of converter sold to each on a semi-annual
basis. EPA reserves the right to require this information upon request.

[Recordkeeping by Manufacturers of New Aftermarket
Converters:]{.underline}

The period of record retention for new aftermarket converter
manufacturers for warranty cards is 5 years.

[Recordkeeping by Installers]{.underline}:

There is no reporting. Installers are required to fill out warranty card
if new aftermarket converter are installed, or provide card to vehicle
owner for completion of applicable sections and submittal to
manufacturer. Installers must state reason for replacement on invoice,
maintain invoices for 6 months, and tag replaced converters for 15 days.

\(ii\) Respondent Activities

The information collection is to be implemented in ways consistent and
compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing
reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond.

"\*" indicates an item is a customary and usual business practice (CBP),
or is partially CBP.

"N/A" indicates this was a one-time cost that has already been absorbed
under start-up costs associated with the policy when it was promulgated
or is otherwise not applicable.

NOTE: There have been losses of new aftermarket catalytic converter
manufacturers since the last ICR. The overall population has been
reduced from 12 to 8.

A. New Aftermarket Catalytic Converter Manufacturers:

A.1. Provide Information Re Specifications and Applications

and Information re Test Results for New Product Lines

N/A(1) Reviewing instructions;

\(2\) Developing, acquiring, installing and utilizing ("DAIU")
technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and
verifying information;

\(3\) DAIU technology and systems for the purpose of processing and
maintaining information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and
providing information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing the information.

This requirement is a one-time burden that only applies to new product
lines. It has already been accomplished for all existing product lines,
many of which are likely to be usable for many years to come. ICR
assumes each manufacturer develops and tests one new line every year.

A.2. Testing for Each New Product Line

N/A(1) Reviewing Instructions;

\(2\) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\(3\) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing the information.

This requirement is a one-time burden that only applies to new product
lines. In many cases it is contracted out.

A.3. Semi-Annual Reports re Manufacturing and Submittal of

Warranty Cards and Maintain Warranty Cards:

These reports are no longer required on a routine basis; EPA reserves
the right to require submission of information upon request.

N/A(1) Reviewing instructions;

\(2\) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\*(3) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing information.

B. Used Catalytic Converter Reconditioners:

B.1. Submit Test Facility Information

N/A(1) Reviewing instructions;

\(2\) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\(3\) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

\(4\) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing the information.

This is a one-time burden which has already been absorbed by on-going
facilities and we know of no new facilities.

B.2. Perform Efficiency Test on Each Used Converter

N/A(1) Reviewing instructions;

\(2\) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\(3\) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing the information.

B.3. Semi-Annual Report Regarding Distribution of Products:

These reports are no longer required on a routine basis; EPA reserves
the right to require submission of information upon request.

N/A(1) Reviewing instructions;

\(2\) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\(3\) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Training personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\(7\) Searching data sources;

\(8\) Completing & reviewing the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmitting or otherwise disclosing the information.

C. Catalytic Converter Installers

C.1. Fill Out Warranty Card (For New Aftermarket Converters

Only), State Reason for Replacement on Invoice and Place Tag on

Removed Converter

N/A(1) Review instructions;

\*(2) DAIU technology and systems for collecting, validating and
verifying information;

\*(3) DAIU technology and systems for processing and maintaining
information;

N/A(4) DAIU technology and systems for disclosing and providing
information;

N/A(5) Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements;

N/A(6) Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information;

\*(7) Search data sources;

\*(8) Complete & review the collection of information;

\(9\) Transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

Most of the recordkeeping and maintenance is CBP.

This ICR also makes an estimate for startup burdens and costs for new
businesses.

5\. [THE INFORMATION COLLECTED\--AGENCY ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION]{.underline} [METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT]{.underline}

5(a) Agency Activities

The information collection has been developed by an office within EPA
(OECA) that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and
effective management and use of the information to be collected,
including the processing of the information in a manner which shall
enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies
and the public.

EPA engages in the following activities in regard to the information
collection.

\-- Review reports,

\-- Conduct inspections or audits as appropriate,

\-- Take enforcement actions where appropriate.

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

New aftermarket catalytic converter manufacturers collect sales data and
warranty cards submitted to them by retail customers who have had
converters installed, or directly from the installers themselves. This
is a customary business practice for many businesses. Until 1999, the
new aftermarket converter manufacturers then reported semi-annually to
EPA manufacturing information (types of converters and how many sold)
and either a computerized list summarizing converter installations or
copies of the actual warranty cards, at their option. However, routine
reporting is now only required regarding specifications for new product
lines. Cards must be kept 5 years because that is the length of the
warranty period.

Since warranties are not required on reconditioned converters, the
converter reconditioners were required, prior to 1999, to provide
semi-annual information regarding to whom they sold reconditioned
converters, how many were sold, and what types were sold. However,
routine reporting is no longer required. .

No other recordkeeping or reporting is necessary for new aftermarket
converter manufacturers unless they create a new line of converters, in
which case data must be submitted regarding test results and appropriate
applications of the converters. For used converter reconditioners,
testing of each converter is necessary to determine if it is still
functional. However, no specific record retention requirement exists
regarding the results of individual tests, other than to include a
certification with the converter that it passed testing. This short
statement can be pre-printed form.

If industry voices an interest in electronic reporting, EPA will
facilitate such data interchange, if practical. In the meantime, we
would be willing to accept computer discs or other electronic
information containing warranty information instead of hard copies of
the information. Since routine reporting of sales and warranty
information is no longer required this does not appear to be a
significant issue.

Installers have no reporting requirement. They merely fill out a
warranty card for each converter installed, and include on the customary
business practice invoice a pre-printed statement with a blank for why
replacement was appropriate. The invoice, including the "reason for
replacement" statement, must be kept for 6 months. In addition, the
removed converter is tagged for a 15 day period, so it can be directly
related to the vehicle and to the aftermarket converter that replaced
it.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

The information collection reduces to the extent practicable and
appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or
for the Agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. § 601(6)), the use of such
techniques as: (1) establishing differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into account the resources
available to those who are to respond; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements; or (3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of
information, or any part thereof.

New aftermarket catalytic converter manufacturers are substantial
businesses with gross revenues in the millions of dollars per year. The
catalytic converter reconditioners tend to be smaller businesses and the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are somewhat less; to wit:
there are no warranty requirements and therefore no requirements to
maintain warranty cards or report warranty information. More
importantly, the policy allows small businesses to compete with the
original equipment manufacturers in a market which was previously
inaccessible to them, and which would not be legal but for this policy.
Many installers are small businesses and have benefitted significantly
from this multimillion dollar industry. Their requirements are minimal
(4-5 minutes per installation, at least some of which is not an EPA
imposed burden since maintaining invoices is a customary business
practice).

5(d) Collection Schedule

Sales reports were previously required to be submitted to EPA by
manufacturers and reconditioners semi-annually. This routine reporting
is no longer required. No other regular reporting exists, but reports
must be submitted by new aftermarket converter manufacturers for new
product lines. Installers do not report. Their recordkeeping occurs at
the time of each installation transaction.

6\. [ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION]{.underline}

Assumptions:

The estimated dollar cost for new aftermarket converter manufacturers
will be different than for used OE converter reconditioners, since the
policy is different for each group. The cost estimates for manufacturers
and reconditioners, and for installers, are outlined below.

[New Converter Manufacturers]{.underline}

1\. The number of new aftermarket converter manufacturers is
approximately 8 (down from 12 in the previous ICR). The cost to new
converter manufacturers consists of 1) the one-time cost of submitting
new product line specifications and testing information to EPA; and 2)
the one-time cost to test two converters for each product line using the
specifications outlined in the policy. There is no longer a burden for
submission of semi-annual reports regarding manufacturing and sales.

2\. Contractor cost: Based on estimates supplied by companies that
provide the testing services, the testing cost for a typical
manufac­turer is approximately \$88,044 per product line. This estimate
includes the cost for personnel to conduct the testing, as well as the
actual cost of the testing equipment and procedures. If the typical
manufacturer markets approximately one new product line every two years,
the total testing cost for a typical new converter manufacturer would be
\$88,044 for two years. Under the assumption that the prevailing
interest rate is 10%, the annualized cost of the development testing
would be \$88,044 amortized over 24 months at 10% compounded monthly, or
\$48,753 per manufacturer per year. We have estimated a 50% increase in
the number of new product lines over the last ICR, in part because there
are fewer manufacturers making the same number of converters.

3\. To estimate the labor cost of tabulating and reporting the
information as required, it was assumed in the 2002 ICR that the cost
for a technician was \$33.68/hr. This cost figure was doubled to reflect
the cost of benefits and overhead, and was adjusted for inflation from
data on the BLS website. For this ICR we have used the newest available
data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics website, which is found at
<http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm).> While no job category
necessarily perfectly fits the technical work performed by aftermarket
catalytic converter manufacturers, we selected one of the highest paying
job categories of those that are closely related: precision metal
workers. Their hourly wage as of 2003 was \$19.62 per hour. In reality,
much of the burden can be performed by lower pay scale clerical staff.
To account for benefits and overhead we have doubled this hourly wage,
which results in an hourly cost of \$39.24. To account for possible
inflation since 2003, we have applied an inflation factor of 1.0571,
which results in an inflation adjusted hourly cost burden of \$41.48.

4\. The actual hour estimates per response (aside from the elimination
of the semi-annual reports as noted above) have been remained the same
since the last ICR. For new converter manufacturers, putting together an
EPA report on specifications of a new product line takes about 2 hours.
We have eliminated reporting on manufacturing and sales information,
which took about 0.5 hr.; and eliminated submission of warranty card
information, which took about 1 hour to box and send to EPA. The
maintaining of records, including warranty records, requires about 1
hour per year.

[Reconditioners of Used Converters]{.underline}

1\. The number of reconditioned converter businesses is six at this
time, down from eight.

2\. The cost to a used converter reconditioner consists of the labor
costs of testing [each\` individual]{.underline} converter according to
the test procedures outlined in the policy, the cost of setting up the
bench testing equipment, and the cost of tabulating and reporting the
information required in the policy. These cost elements are treated
separately below.

3\. Two technicians are needed to test each converter. The cost of a
technician per hour is estimated to be somewhat less than for a new
aftermarket converter manufacturer, and instead is estimated to be about
the same as an automobile mechanic. For the cost of an employee burden
hour, we used the same costs as for new aftermarket converter
manufacturers. This gives an hourly cost per employee of \$41.48,
including the cost of benefits and overhead and adjusted for inflation
to 2005 dollars.

4\. An average of 2.00 minutes are required for each test.

5\. Capital Costs for reconditioners equipment are based on test
equipment cost of about \$172,000, having a useful life of about 5
years. If this is amortized over 5 years the yearly cost comes to about
\$43,854 per reconditioner per year, including interest charges (10%
interest).

6\. Record-keeping costs for tabulating and reporting information to
Agency are based on the same labor rate as above, even though some of
this work may be done by lower pay scale clerical workers.

7\. Reconditioners no longer have the previous reporting burden of
preparation of a semi-annual report (such reports previously took about
4 hrs.; less than 8 hrs. per year). The maintenance of these records
takes about 1 hour per year.

[Installers of Aftermarket Converters]{.underline}

1\. There are approximately 30,000 automotive exhaust repair shops
nationwide. It is assumed that these entities install the vast majority
of aftermarket converters and it is further assumed that all of these
entities install converters, and generally excludes tire/brake shops,
and other non-exhaust repair facilities such as electrical diagnostic
and other such facilities.

2\. There are currently 2.3-2.7 million new aftermarket converters
installed per year. A recent report from the Manufacturers of Emission
controls Association reported a total of 3,079,249 new aftermarket
converters produced in 2001 (including catalytic converters manufactured
for use in Mexico).

3\. Typically, it takes an exhaust repair technician 4-5 minutes per
installation to handle all recordkeeping requirements (fill out warranty
card if applicable, fill in blank on invoice regarding reason for
replacement, and tag the converter that was removed). This estimate is
based on information from shop owners as well as EPA experience with the
paperwork. In many cases, blank warranty cards are simply provided to
customers, further reducing burden times.

4\. The cost of an employee per hour is estimated to be about the same
as an automobile mechanic. For the cost of an employee burden hour, we
used the most recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for 2003
(\$17.88) and doubled that figure to reflect benefits and overhead. This
gives an hourly cost of \$35.76. We adjusted for inflation to 2005
dollars, which results in an hourly cost estimate of \$37.80.

5\. Using the above assumptions, each shop averages 83 installations per
year. On the average, the paperwork is assumed to take about 5 minutes
per installation, or 7 hours per year. At \$37.80 per hour, this comes
to \$263 per year per shop.

6(a) Estimates of Respondent Burden and Cost

A. New Aftermarket Catalytic Converter Manufacturers

1\. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW PRODUCT LINES:

One-time burden for each new product line. Assume each manufacturer
develops one new product line every year.

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: 2.0

COST PER RESPONDENT: \$82.96

HRS. FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: 16

COST FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: \$664

2\. TESTING OF PROTOTYPES (Purchased Services):

One-time burden for new product lines. Assume 1 new product line per
manufacturer every two years.

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: (contracted out)

ANNUALIZED COST PER RESPONDENT: \$48,753

HRS FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: N/A

COST FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: \$390,024

3\. SEMI-ANNUAL SUBMISSIONS OF MANUFACTURING DATA AND

WARRANTY CARDS (reporting requirement discontinued; Recordkeeping
exists):

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: 1

COST PER RESPONDENT: \$41.48

HRS. FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: 8

COST FOR 8 RESPONDENTS: \$331.84

4\. ANNUALIZED O & M COSTS (for postage): \$5 \* 8 parties = \$40 for
all respondents.

B. USED CATALYTIC CONVERTER RECONDITIONERS

1\. SUBMIT TEST FACILITY INFORMATION:

This is a one-time burden which has already been absorbed by current
reconditioners. No new facilities are anticipated within the period.

2\. PERFORM EFFICIENCY TESTS ON EACH NEW CONVERTER:

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: 623 (Represents 9345 converters tested per year per
Respondent)

COST PER RESPONDENT: \$25,842

HRS. FOR 6 RESPONDENTS: 3,738

COST FOR 6 RESPONDENTS: \$155,052

3\. SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS (No
reporting, but must maintain records):

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: 1

COST PER RESPONDENT: \$41.48

HRS. FOR 6 RESPONDENTS: 6

COST FOR 6 RESPONDENTS: \$248.88

4\. AMORTIZED CAPITAL COSTS PER RESPONDENT: \$43,854.

AMORTIZED CAPITAL COSTS FOR 6 RESPONDENTS: \$263,124.

5\. ANNUALIZED O & M (for postage): None.

C. RECORDKEEPING BY EXHAUST SYSTEM REPAIR FACILITIES

1\. MAINTAIN INVOICES & REMOVAL JUSTIFICATION & TAG CONVERTERS

HRS. PER RESPONDENT: 7

COST PER RESPONDENT: \$263

HRS. FOR 30,000 RESPONDENTS: 209,000

COST FOR 30,000 RESPONDENTS: \$7,875,000

2\. STARTUP COSTS: 100 STARTUPS \* 5 HRS. = 500 TOTAL hours x \$37.80 =

\$18,900

CAPITAL COSTS (to purchase converter storage space): \$228 \* 100 =
\$22,800 for all respondents.

6(b) Summary of Respondent Costs

1\. Total Yearly Costs for New Aftermarket Converter Manufacturers:

\$48,758 per respondent, including contractor testing costs & O

& M costs; \$390,064 for all 8 respondents.

2\. Total Yearly Costs for Converter Reconditioners:

\$25,884 for yearly converter tests to check

efficiency, capital costs of \$43,854 = \$69,737 per respondent, and
\$418,425 for all 6 respondents.

3\. Total yearly costs for installers:

\$263 for 1 respondent = \$7,875,000 for all 30,000 installer
facilities.

Total Startup costs for new businesses: 5 hrs. plus \$228 for filing
space or \$417 per party \* 100 new parties per year = \$41,700 total.

TOTAL YEARLY BURDEN: \$8,725,189 (including salaries); 212,101 hrs. for
all respondents, including testing (plus 500 hrs. for 100 startups =
212,601 hrs.). Annualized cost burden other than salaries: \$675,988.

SUMMARY OF RESPONDENTS' BURDENS AND COSTS BY CATEGORY:

I. New Aftermarket Catalytic Converter Manufacturers

A. Annual Burden Hours per Party: 3. (24 for all 8 respondents)

B. Annualized Capital Costs per Party: \$0.00.

C. Annualized Operating Costs per party: \$5.00 (\$40 for all 8)

D. Annualized Startup Costs: \$0.00 (no new entities entering the
market).

E. Annual Purchased Services per Party (for Testing of Prototypes):
\$48,753. (\$390,024 for all 8).

II\. Used Aftermarket Catalytic Converter Manufacturers

A. Annual Burden Hours per Party: 624 (testing of catalytic converters
to determine they are functional; the actual recordkeeping burden is
minimal). (3,744 for all 6)

B. Annualized Capital Costs per Party: \$43,854. (\$263,124 for all 6)

C. Annualized Operating Costs per Party: \$0.

D. Annualized Startup Costs: None. There have been no new parties and
none are expected in the next 3 years.

E. Annual Purchased Services per Party: \$0.00.

III\. Installers of Aftermarket Converters

A. Annual Burden Hours per Party: 7

B. Annualized Capital Costs per Party: \$0.00.

C. Annualized Operating Costs per party: \$0.00.

D. Annual Purchased Services per Party: \$0.00.

E. Annualized Startup Costs: Assume 100 new installers per year; Assume
reviewing instructions and setting up recordkeeping systems requires 5
hrs per party and the purchase of file space of \$228. Total startup
cost would be \$189 plus \$228, for a total of \$417 per party and
\$41,700 nationwide.

6(c) Estimated EPA Burden and Cost

The direct cost of personnel to process and analyze the information
collected is estimated to be \$500 or about 20 hours at the cost of a
grade 12 employee. An estimated travel cost of \$5,000 would be needed
to monitor compliance with the policy, in addition to travel already
used for retail level inspections for automobile emissions tampering
generally. The total annual cost to the government is thus estimated to
be \$5500.

6(d) Reasons for Change in Burden

Burdens for new and used aftermarket converter manufacturers and
reconditioners have been decreased to reflect reduced reporting since
reporting sales and warranty information is no longer required. We also
increased the amount of burden for testing new converters since the
number of new converters made has remained the same while the number of
manufacturers has decreased. We have adjusted cost figures for
inflation. The number of converter installation facilities, and
converters being installed have stayed flat as have the burden hours per
converter installation; however, total burden hours requested have
increased due to the correction of an error in previous renewals (see
below for explanation). Government cost has been decreased significantly
as the result of the elimination of most respondent reporting
requirements.

It is important to note that a combination of errors in calculations in
the previous ICR (67FR 319-320, Jan. 3, 2002) led to the annual burden
hours for installers being represented as 3.5 hours/year, rather than 7
hours/year. Spread over 30,000 installer respondents this led to a
shortfall of 104, 000 burden hours. This figure has been correctly
calculated in this ICR renewal. There is, therefore, no increase in
burden hours to the industry, rather the correction of a previous error
which accounts for the higher burden hour numbers.

6(e) Burden Statement

The public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average:

3 hours per new aftermarket converter manufacturer, on average, with \$5
annual operational costs per year and annualized purchased services
costs per year of \$48,753;

624 hours (including converter testing time) per used converter
reconditioner, on average, with annualized capital costs per year of
\$43,854; and

7 hours per respondent for aftermarket converter installation
facilities, with an additional 5 hours for the first year for startup
facilities and an additional \$228 for startup capital costs.

The overall average is 7 hours per response (212,101 total burden hours
divided by 30,014 respondents).

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to
review instructions, develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The
OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 C.F.R. Part 9
and 48 C.F.R. Chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.
OECA-2005-0052, which is available for public viewing at the Enforcement
and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and
Information Center is (202) 566-1752. An electronic version of the
public docket is available through EPA Dockets (EDOCKET) at
http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket,
and to access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically. Once in the system, select "search," then key in the
docket ID number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk
Office for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID No. OECA-2005-0052 and
OMB control number 2060-0135 in any correspondence.

**[Part B of the Supporting Statement]{.underline}**

This part is not applicable..

**PART B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS**

This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used
in the data collection associated with the aftermarket catalytic
converter policy.

APPENDIX A. Summary of Comments to First Federal Register Notice

No comments were received.

APPENDIX B. Citation for Information Requirements of the ICR

The information requirements of this ICR are enumerated in the Agency's
proposed and interim enforcement policy published in the Federal
Register on August 5, 1986 (51 Fed. Reg. 28114). In this Federal
Register notice the Agency proposed to amend 40 C.F.R. Part 85 by adding
a new Appendix IX, which would consist of this enforcement policy. There
are no regulations applicable to this information collection. The
citations listed below for the information require­ments refer to this
Federal Register notice.

Information Requirement Fed. Reg. Citation

New Converter Manufacturers

> Collect and Transmit Converter specifications to EPA 51 FR 28119
>
> Collect, file and maintain warranty information 51 FR 28117

Used Converter Reconditioners

> Collect, file and maintain sales information and customer lists 51 FR
> 28118

Installers

> Invoices, Warranties, Tag converters 51 FR 28816