-------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**  **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                             2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**   2010**   2011**

  Project BB -- Small        0        0        2.3      2.4      2.4      2.4      2.4      2.4
  Business Innovative                                                                       
  Research (SBIR)                                                                           
  -------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

This project provides the means for stimulating technological innovation
in the private sector, strengthens the role of small business in meeting
DoD research and development needs; fosters and encourages participation
of minority and disadvantaged businesses in technological innovation;
and increases the commercial application of DoD supported research and
development results. These efforts are responsive to PL 106-554.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Small Business Innovative Research   0        0        2.3      2.4
  (SBIR)                                                          
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

-   In year of execution, funding executed under PE 0605502BR "Small
    Business Innovative Research"

-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

-   Execute Agency-approved SBIRs.

**FY 2005 Plans**

-   In year of execution, funding executed under PE 0605502BR "Small
    Business Innovative Research"

-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

-   Execute Agency-approved SBIRs.

**FY 2006 Plans**

-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

-   Execute Agency-approved SBIRs.

**FY 2007 Plans**

-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

-   Execute Agency-approved SBIRs.

# 

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ## | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| millions)**             | ## | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY |
|                         | ## | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
|                         |  F | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 |
|                         | Y  | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|                         | 20 |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
|                         | 04 |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
| Project BD -- Weapons   | 65 | 67 | 73 | 75 | 75 | 76 | 78 | 80 |
| Effects Technologies    | .4 | .5 | .6 | .3 | .5 | .9 | .7 | .6 |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+

A.  **Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   Project BD provides the research and development underpinning for
    the next generation of agent defeat, deny and disrupt counterforce
    weapon development and application of products and services to meet
    Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and other special weapons effects
    challenges using state-of-the-art science and engineering
    capabilities, including advanced first principles analysis,
    engineering modeling, simulation and networking technologies, novel
    payload development and evaluation capability, and precision
    laboratory scale and field testing capabilities (supported by
    Project BE-Testing Technologies and Integration). This project will
    develop an over-arching framework for all Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear and high Explosive (CBRNE) related modeling
    and simulation tools as well as the next generation of counterforce
    agent defeat, deny, and disrupt operational capability. Initially,
    the focus of the modeling component will be on producing the
    Integrated WMD Toolset (IWMDT) that will provide Department of
    Defense (DoD) users access to valid WMD tools in a consistent
    fashion and provide for standardized Configuration Management (CM)
    and Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) of all
    included model components and systems. The counterforce Agent Defeat
    (AD) weapon component will initially pursue two tracks, one focused
    on extending the lethality of agent defeat payloads to include a
    persistent constituent in both the plume and near debris field and a
    second on developing the advanced diagnostic capability required for
    both sub- and full-scale evaluations of these payloads. Subsequent
    efforts will focus on the development of deny payloads and payloads
    with a specific interaction with ISR assets for improved post attack
    assessment capability. Initiatives supported by this project
    include, but are not limited to, such activities as follow:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Integrating and applying advanced capabilities to improve decision
    making effectiveness in the face of rapidly evolving WMD threats in
    both military and civilian sectors. Products being developed include
    CBRNE target planning and assessment tools, CBRNE hazardous
    materials transport and collateral effects prediction tools, tools
    and technologies to mitigate and assess the effects of hazardous
    material on facilities and people, and consequence
    assessment/management tools to evaluate and respond to such events.
    Models and tools developed support Project BK-Counterforce in PE
    0603160BR, Proliferation Prevention Defeat

-   Developing technologies to support force protection assessments,
    forensic analysis of terrorist events and advanced blast
    mitigation/retrofit techniques. Tools developed in this project
    support other projects including Project BC-Force Protection and
    Technology Applications in PE 0602717BR, WMD Defense Technologies,
    and Project BF-CP Operational Warfighter Support, as well as
    civilian, antiterrorism and disaster response support organizations;

-   Developing and validating Chemical/Biological Warfare (CBW) defeat
    and disrupt weapon effectiveness and collateral release diagnostics
    for the Hard and Deeply Buried Target (HDBT), Weapons of Mass
    Destruction (WMD) facility testbeds;

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Providing, maintaining and applying the weapons of mass destruction
    technology base. The technology base applies expertise developed
    originally for nuclear weapon detonation(s) phenomenology
    (subsurface through exo-atmospheric), the evolution of the resulting
    disturbed environment, and the effects of that environment on
    systems. The expertise has expanded to all weapons of mass
    destruction. This is accomplished by providing weapons effects
    technology and information to U.S. and Allied weapon systems
    developers, government planners, operators, doctrine authors, and
    decision makers;

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Developing the next generation of thermal based Agent Defeat
    payloads for inclusion in both direct and stand-off munitions;

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Developing novel payloads that can effectively defeat complex agent
    targets combinations of both Biological Weapons (BW) and Chemical
    Weapons (CW) agents

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Developing and maintaining the technical capability to predict the
    impact of the effects of weapons of mass destruction on all aspects
    of warfighting, to include communications, radar and optical sensor
    systems and to support DoD components in the analysis and prediction
    of the response of systems that must operate in nuclear and
    naturally disturbed environments.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   An integral component of this project is the provision of access to
    state-of-the-art high-performance computing (HPC) machines,
    high-speed connectivity, and superior technical support to DTRA
    researchers nationwide.

-   DTRA is the Department of Defense center of excellence for nuclear
    weapon burst phenomenology and the resulting interaction with
    military and civilian systems. Starting with weapon output
    calculations, DTRA develops the tools for predicting the subsequent
    evolution of all nuclear weapon induced effects including the blast
    and shock interactions for low-altitude, surface and sub-surface
    nuclear explosions; electromagnetic pulse (EMP); prompt, delayed,
    and trapped radiation; plasma and radioactive debris history. These
    efforts rely on ready access to high-performance computing (HPC)
    resources to enable the efficient solution of the resultant
    large-scale numerical simulations.

-   DTRA shares a stewardship responsibility with the special weapons
    related defense community to maintain the Nation's core nuclear
    competencies and to successfully pass on this knowledge base and
    critical skills to the next generation of defense oriented
    scientists, engineers and weapon system developers. This is provided
    through the Knowledge Application project, a tight integration of
    three efforts - Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center
    (DTRIAC), Data Archival and Retrieval Enhancement (DARE), and
    Graybeard -- dedicated to the collection and preservation of the
    data and knowledge derived during more than 50 years of nuclear
    weapons effects testing and studies; and a fourth effort, the
    Knowledge Applications component, that capitalizes on the expertise
    derived from these three programs by applying it to current Agency
    technical programs. Today this research is based on simulations and
    high fidelity calculations requiring correlation with this
    \"legacy\" data for validation.

-   Assist in the development of a National Center for Blast Mitigation
    which will comprise of predictions of blast effects on structures,
    development of blast mitigation/protection techniques, the
    development of forensic techniques to obtain intelligence and aid in
    policy making and strategic decisions in the areas of building codes
    and safe perimeter certification.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Targeting Support                    20.0     16.6     15.5     16.3
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

##  FY 2004 Accomplishments

-   Provided instrumentation for the tunnel target test series in
    Ladenburg, addressing dry chemicals in containers with baseline
    weapons in support of Project BF-CP Operational Warfighter Support.

-   Provided automated access to the technology contained within the
    Design and Analysis of Hardened Structures to Conventional Weapons
    Effects (DAHS CWE) manual through incorporation of the data and
    methods into Protective Structure Automated Design System (PSADS).

-   Developed an Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT)
    prototype for the combatant commands to use for operational
    implementation of the new technology that will provide access to
    DTRA targeting support tools to the warfighter via the Secret
    Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) and Joint Worldwide
    Intelligence Communications System (JWICS).

-   Began the changes to the architecture of the Integrated Munitions
    Effects Assessment (IMEA) tool to fit into the Integrated Weapons of
    Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT) framework.

-   Improved the kinetic reaction parameters for agent defeat modeling
    by including the Passive Attack Weapon (PAW) in the Integrated
    Munitions Effects Assessment (IMEA) software tool to support Project
    BF-CP Operational Warfighter Support.

-   Delivered a nuclear module and additional capabilities in the
    buildings, bunkers, and tunnels modules in IMEA v.5.0.

-   Updated the Penetration Curve (PENCRV) model with IMEA to run faster
    and to incorporate small weapon penetration predictions.
    High-velocity penetration test data will be used to develop and
    validate a penetration model for emerging high-velocity weapons.

-   Began development of a PC-based force protection tool, VAPO
    (Vulnerability Assessment and Protection Option,) leveraging the
    extensive weapons effects models developed for IMEA. This
    application will focus on providing DTRA assessment teams with a
    single tool to assist in their missions of improving the defensive
    posture of U.S. assets.

-   Completed assessment of the potential consequences of terrorists
    using volatile fuels as weapons. Methodologies to estimate potential
    blast pressures and associated damage to buildings were developed.

-   Developed reinforced concrete column retrofit to mitigate the effect
    of satchel threats and reduce potential for progressive collapse.

-   Initiated testing and model development for steel frame structures.
    Results will be incorporated into the IMEA and VAPO tools.

-   Began development of a PC-based tool to more accurately predict
    blast effects on structures in urban settings. The tool will
    integrated into the Vulnerability Assessment and Protection Option
    (VAPO), and Integrated Munitions Effects Assessment (IMEA) tools and
    will be used to develop blast mitigation solutions and to conduct
    forensic studies.

-   Delivered Integrated Theatre Engagement Model (ITEM) with updated
    amphibious capability.

> **FY 2005 Plans**

-   Deliver enhanced weapons systems and modeling capabilities,
    including a multi-hit module, Response Surface Mapping (RSM),
    improved site visualization capabilities, blast door model,
    equipment fragility model, and tunnel airblast model with IMEA
    version 6.0.

-   Validate the high-velocity penetration model for implementation in
    IMEA version 7.0

-   Extend the penetration model to handle small scale projectile
    penetration into concrete.

-   Develop additional lethality/vulnerability models for damage from
    enhanced lethality weapons (i.e. high temperature incendiaries).

-   Improve cratering models to account for detonations completely below
    burster slabs.

-   Validation of sub-scale cylindrical cased charge fragmentation test
    data by comparison to similar full scale tests

-   Deliver explosive blast, chemical and biological hazards mission
    protection capabilities in VAPO version 1.0 for use by the Joint
    Service Integrated Vulnerability Assessment (JSIVA) Community.

-   Deliver an Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT)
    capability that provides planning and assessment capability for
    conventional and nuclear targeting along with WMD analysis for net
    centric warfare.

-   Complete testing of steel frame structures and initiate model
    development.

-   Commence study on blast effects on wood and steel stud construction.
    Conduct tests to determine extent of damage and potential for
    progressive collapse.

-   Deliver ITEM with an initial Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
    Impact Capability.

    **FY 2006 Plans**

-   Perform tests to validate improved cratering models for weapons
    detonating below a burster slab (flexural failure).

-   Develop probability-based analytical techniques for evaluating the
    residual resistance function of structural components subsequent to
    loadings.

-   Conduct experiments to predict bridge target defeats with fragment
    producing weapons against reinforced/prestressed concrete and steel
    bridge components.

-   Improve weaponeering models against underground urban systems that
    can be used by the enemy for counteroffensive troop movements.

-   Improve penetration models based on test data from full scale tests.

-   Implement penetration data from tests of weapons against multi-story
    buildings to improve weaponeering methods against these targets.

-   Deliver Vulnerability Assessment and Protection Option (VAPO)
    version 2.0, with nuclear and radiological hazards mission
    protection capabilities, to expand its user base to include the
    Balanced Survivability Assessment (BSA) community.

-   Deliver IMEA 7.0 with enhanced penetration and cratering models, as
    well as updated nuclear prediction capabilities.

-   Integrate advanced payload models into Integrated Munitions Effects
    Assessment (IMEA) weapons database.

-   Update tunnel reconstitution model with test data gathered from
    DIVINE HELCAT.

-   Implement enhanced Underground Targeting and Analysis System (UTAS)
    network-wide functional defeat and special operations planning and
    target visualization functionality in Integrated Munitions Effects
    Assessment IMEA/UTAS tool.

-   Integrate portal extension engineering response model in IMEA 7.0.

-   Complete model development for steel frame and wood and steel stud
    structures.

-   Integrate advanced capabilities of targeting support, consequence
    assessment and consequence management into the Integrated Weapons of
    Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT) Net-Centric architecture.

-   Deliver an enhanced IWMDT capability that provides Net-Centric
    operational integration of Command, Control, Communications,
    Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance, (C4ISR)
    common operating picture, and intelligence with a robust Chemical,
    Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High Explosives, (CBRNE)
    web-browser and web-services capability for the spectrum of
    operations from conventional to Chem-Bio and extending to nuclear
    analysis.

-   Deliver Integrated Theatre Engagement Model, (ITEM) with a complete
    Weapons of Mass Destruction, (WMD) impact capability.

    **FY 2007 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Deliver Munitions Effects Assessment Version 8.0 with new collateral
    effects and modeling information for new weapon systems.

-   Perform small-scale demonstration tests to validate data from
    large-scale tests of reactive structural materials.

-   Begin model development for Non-Energetic Advanced Payload Fills
    integration for use in conventional Bomb Live Unit (BLU)-109 and
    Mark (MK)-84 munitions.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Perform simulations to validate WMD operational defeat
    demonstrations using the Facility 3 testbed.

-   Integrate data from testing and demonstrations at the egress denial
    testbed into functional defeat models.

-   Conduct blast testing and methodology development to fill gaps
    identified in the development of the DoD Security Engineering
    Manual.

-   Initiate development of fast-running airblast model for complex
    geometries.

-   Initiate development of comprehensive curtain wall design
    methodology.

-   Initial integration of sensor/sensor model capability.

-   Fully integrate 4D visualization, sequencer, infrastructure,
    interdependence, radio frequency, mitigation/remediation and high
    altitude nuclear effects, initial integration of unconventional
    munitions.

-   Fully integrate capability to model effects of Weapons of Mass
    Destruction (WMD) employment in a Joint Theatre Campaign.

-   Theatre Engagement Model, Integrated Theatre Engagement Model (ITEM)
    has fully integrated multi-user interface and remote access
    capability.

-   Fully integrate Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset
    (IWMDT)/Nevada architecture into Global Information Grid (GiG) and
    Network-Centric Enterprise Services (NCES) providing broader
    Chemical/Biological/Radiological/Nuclear/High Explosive (CBRNE)
    support to warfighter.

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Environments                         15.2     16.7     21.7     22.3
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

(Re-titled in FY 2005 from Nuclear Phenomenology)

#### FY 2004 Accomplishments

-   Completed initial calculations to understand and establish bounds
    for selected uncertainties in "first principle" codes.

-   Completed initial modeling of Global Positioning System (GPS)
    operation in a nuclear environment.

-   Continued dissemination of nuclear effects predictions and system
    interaction tools to DoD users.

-   Provide nuclear weapons effects tools for Strategic Command
    (STRATCOM) and Missile Defense Agency (MDA) functions.

-   Initiated development of an advanced 3-Dimensional Near Surface
    Effects Computational System for unique effects assessments
    including structures, transportation infrastructure and Weapon of
    Mass Destruction (WMD) hazardous agents.

-   Initiated advanced combined effects simulation system for near
    surface low-yield nuclear effects in city (terrorist use of nuclear
    weapons).

-   Initiated the incorporation of nuclear-weapon-in-city analysis into
    fast-running algorithms for Hazard Prediction and Assessment
    Capability/Consequence Assessment Tool Set (HPAC/CATS).

-   Completed the validation of the nuclear and non-nuclear
    Electromagnetic Pulse tools developed for STRATCOM.

-   Populated the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Tools with test databases.

-   Delivered Strategic Command, Control, Communications, Connectivity
    Assessment Tool (STRATCAT) tool for STRATCOM.

-   Completed the Full Operational Capability (FOC) for the Strategic C4
    Assessment Tool (STRATCAT) tool for STRATCOM.

-   Continued work on Volume 2 of Redbook and output from terrorist
    devices.

-   Carried out analysis of effects of low-yield nuclear weapon in
    modern city.

-   Quantified enhanced agent kill mechanism.

-   Completed initial experiments and modeling of enhanced nuclear agent
    defeat.

-   Completed initial technical reviews of new textbook on nuclear
    weapon effects, comments incorporated into new draft.

    **FY 2005 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Calculate weapon output for improvised nuclear devices to better
    characterize future potential threats.

-   Continue work on Volume 2 of Redbook and output from terrorist
    devices.

-   Refine methods for bio-agent defeat by persistent effects in nuclear
    fireballs and incorporate as tool in Integrated Weapons of Mass
    Destruction Toolset (IWMDT).

-   Develop weapon system-specific characterization of radioactive
    weapon debris for use in fallout modeling.

-   Demonstrate high-fidelity dispersion of materials in urban areas.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development of an advanced 3-Dimensional Near Surface
    Effects Computational System for unique effects assessments
    including structures, e.g., buildings, bunkers, etc., transportation
    infrastructure, e.g., subways, bridges, etc., and Weapon of Mass
    Destruction (WMD) agents.

-   Continue advanced combined effects simulation system for near
    surface low-yield nuclear effects in city (terrorist use of nuclear
    weapons).

-   Continue the incorporation of nuclear-weapon-in-city analysis into
    fast-running algorithms for Hazard Prediction and Assessment
    Capability/Consequence Assessment Tool Set (HPAC/CATS).

-   Develop concepts and tools to employ enhanced biological agent kill
    mechanism.

-   Provide annual High Altitude Nuclear Effects Prediction Tool
    Workshop and delivery of Advanced System Survivability Integrated
    Toolkit (ASSIST) 2005

-   Support US STRATCOM General Group 05 (GG05) War Game exercise and
    provide Survivability Planning and Intercept Evaluation Tool - DTRA
    (SPIET-D) engagement prediction tool.

-   Conversion of the \"integrated Space Weather Prediction Model Input
    Signal Management, (ISM) to run on massively parallel computers

-   Initiate second round of technical reviews of new textbook on
    nuclear weapon effects.

-   Finalize Project Graybeard by incorporating Project results in Data
    Archival and Retrieval Enhancement (DARE) Complete initial
    \"Global\" capability for SCENARIO Tool family and begin \"Global\"
    capability modifications for Nuclear Optical and Radar Systems
    Effects (NORSE) system tool family.

-   Begin transitioning the high altitude nuclear effects modeling and
    simulation codes into the Nuclear Capabilities Server to meet an
    integrated, net centric interoperable system.

    **FY 2006 Plans**

    Provide annual High Altitude Nuclear Effects Prediction Tool
    Workshop and delivery of Advanced System Survivability Integrated
    Toolkit (ASSIST) 2006.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Maintain support to US STRATCOM and other commands/agencies for
    their use of Survivability Planning and Intercept Evaluation Tool -
    DTRA (SPIET-D) and the Advanced System Survivability Integrated
    Toolkit (ASSIST) toolkit.

-   Carry out initial computations of the Input Signal Management (ISM)
    with a nuclear burst source term.

-   Deliver Full Operational Capability (FOC) nuclear cloud lofted dust
    module for Strategic Command (STRATCOM).

-   Continue development of \"Global\" capability for all high altitude
    nuclear weapon effects prediction tools.

-   Accomplish the integration of an advanced 3-Dimensional Near Surface
    Effects Computational System for unique effects assessments
    including structures, e.g., buildings, bunkers, etc., transportation
    infrastructure, e.g., subways, bridges, etc., communication systems,
    e.g., towers and connectivity and distribution structures,
    transportation infrastructure, e.g., subways, bridges, etc., and
    Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) devices or agents.

-   Develop an advanced combined effects simulation system for near
    surface low-yield nuclear effects in city (terrorist use of nuclear
    weapons).

-   Accomplish advanced beta testing of the incorporation of
    nuclear-weapon-in-city analysis into fast-running algorithms for
    Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability/Consequence Assessment
    Tool Set (HPAC/CATS) or other DTRA fast running codes for the
    Warfighter.

-   Develop updated modeling and simulation capability of sub-surface
    nuclear burst environments and phenomenology.

-   Continue transitioning High Altitude Nuclear Effects (HANE) systems
    codes to Nuclear Capability Server (NuCS).

    **FY 2007 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Improve and update stockpile (Blue Book) and foreign nuclear warhead
    radiation output models (Red Book) using 2-D and 3-D computations to
    provide greater precision.

-   Provide annual High Altitude Nuclear Effects Prediction Tool
    Workshop and delivery of Advanced System Survivability Integrated
    Toolkit (ASSIST) 2007.

-   Maintain support to US STRATCOM and other commands/agencies for
    their use of Survivability Planning and Intercept Evaluation Tool -
    DTRA (SPIET-D) and the Advanced System Survivability Integrated
    Toolkit (ASSIST) Toolkit.

-   Continue transitioning High Altitude Nuclear Effects system codes to
    Nuclear Capability Server.

-   Complete development of \"Global\" capability for all high altitude
    nuclear weapons effects prediction tools.

-   Carry out initial computations of the ISM with beta radiation
    trapping, loss, and transport mechanism.

-   Provide independent support and validation of engineering
    development and testing of Earth Penetrator technology.

  --------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**               **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                          2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Hazard Prediction and Assessment        17.8     15.5     14.9     15.3
  Capability (HPAC)/Consequence                                      
  Assessment                                                         
  --------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

-   Completed Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability, (HPAC) 4.04
    with industrial facility and transportation hazard release and urban
    atmospheric transport capabilities.

-   Completed data synthesis, archive, and began conducting scientific
    validation of urban dispersion model using data from FY 2003
    full-scale urban test.

-   Completed initial development of enhanced radiological decay in
    HPAC.

-   Initiated development of water transport model in collaboration with
    US Navy. Water transport model will encompass rivers, ports, and
    oceans (littoral region).

-   Continued assessment of littoral-region mesoscale weather
    forecasting model performance and implement recommended
    improvements.

-   Initiated development of Chemical, Biological, Radiological,
    Nuclear, High Explosive, (CBRNE) Decision Support Tool to assist
    Combatant Commands, Services, and installation commanders with
    consequence management planning and decision-making.

-   Delivered initial validated capability of interior building hazard
    transport model to Northern Command (NORTHCOM) and service
    organizations.

-   Integrated weather data from multiple sources and format for use in
    HPAC to provide operational hazard predictions that more fully
    account for uncertainty in weather observations and forecasts.

-   Provided technical and operational support to OSD, Joint Staff, and
    Combatant Command contingency operations and exercises as required.

-   Continued integration of hazard prediction tools into OSD Joint
    Effects Module Block 1.

-   Continued to support Global Information System, GIS-based
    infrastructure and web-based technologies in support of integrated
    Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) planning and assessment tools and
    systems.

    **FY 2005 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete HPAC 4.05. Provide full Hazard Prediction and Assessment
    Capability/Consequence Assessment Tool Set (HPAC/CATS) functionality
    for Integrated WMD Toolset (IWMDT), a web-based access to all
    consequence assessment tools.

-   Complete restricted version of HPAC 4.05 to meet Strategic
    Command\'s (STRATCOM) consequence of execution requirements.

-   Complete validation of urban dispersion modeling capability using
    data from FY 2003 full-scale urban test.

-   Initiate integration of population movement (day and night) and
    evacuation algorithms with casualty estimation models.

-   Link Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC\'s)
    atmospheric transport to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory\'s
    Hydrologic Transport Assessment System (HYTRAS) water borne
    transport model via US Navy funded support of the United States
    Coast Guard (USCG) homeland security - counterterrorism mission in
    rivers and estuarine areas (littoral region).

-   Continue development of water transport model in collaboration with
    US Navy.

-   Continue littoral-region mesoscale weather forecasting model
    development.

-   Continue development of
    Chemical/Biological/Radiological/Nuclear/High Explosive (CBRNE)
    Decision Support Tool to assist Combatant Commands, Services, and
    installation commanders with consequence management planning and
    decision making.

-   Expand capability of interior building hazard transport model to
    include buildings and data of interest for Northern Command
    (NORTHCOM) and service organizations.

-   Complete linkage of Air Force Combat Climatology Center
    climatological weather server to HPAC weather data servers for
    general user access.

-   Continue to provide integrated weather data from multiple sources
    for use in HPAC to provide operational hazard predictions that more
    fully account for uncertainty in weather observations and forecasts.

-   Provide technical and operational support to OSD, Joint Staff, and
    combatant command contingency operations and exercises as required.

-   Initiate integration of hazard prediction tools into OSD Joint
    Effects Module Block 2.

-   Integrate military medical planning capability
    Nuclear-Biological-Chemical (NBC) Casualty and Resource Estimation
    Support Tool in coordination with the US Army Office of the Surgeon
    General.

    **FY 2006 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate development of economic and environmental assessment
    algorithms/methods resulting from nuclear or radiation
    contamination.

-   Complete littoral-region mesoscale weather forecasting and
    demonstrate integrated capability.

-   Continue to integrate all consequence assessment tools and
    functionality for Integrated WMD Toolset (IWMDT).

-   Continue integration of population movement (day and night) and
    evacuation algorithms with casualty estimation tools.

-   Integrate improved water transport models in collaboration with the
    US Navy.

-   Continue development of CBRNE Decision Support Tool to assist
    Combatant Commands, Services, and installation commanders with
    consequence management planning and decision making.

-   Continue to provide integrated weather data from multiple sources
    for use in Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) to
    provide operational hazard predictions that more fully account for
    uncertainty in weather observations and forecasts.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue integration of hazard prediction tools into OSD Joint
    Effects Module Block 2.

-   Integrate infectious disease models into consequence assessment
    tools.

-   Provide technical and operational support to OSD, Joint Staff, and
    combatant command contingency operations and exercises as required.

    **FY 2007 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue to integrate all consequence assessment tools and
    functionality for Integrated WMD Toolset (IWMDT).

-   Continue development of
    Chemical/Biological/Radiological/Nuclear/High Explosive (CBRNE)
    Decision Support Tool to assist Combatant Commands, Services, and
    installation commanders with consequence management planning and
    decision making.

-   Complete development of economic and environmental assessment
    algorithms/methods resulting from nuclear or radiation
    contamination.

-   Continue integration of population movement (day and night) and
    evacuation algorithms with casualty estimation tools.

-   Integrate improved water transport models in collaboration with the
    US Navy.

-   Integrate chemical kinetics into models based on test data from Air
    Force Research Lab.

-   Initiate Smoke and Obscurants model to estimate degradation of
    combat targeting and reconnaissance systems.

-   Complete integration of infectious disease models into consequence
    assessment tools.

-   Continue to provide integrated weather data from multiple sources
    for use in Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) to
    provide operational hazard predictions that more fully account for
    uncertainty in weather observations and forecasts.

-   Continue integration of hazard prediction tools into OSD Joint
    Effects Module Block 3.

-   Provide technical and operational support to OSD, Joint Staff, and
    combatant command contingency operations and exercises as required.

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 9.3      9.9      8.8      9.0
  (ASCO)                                                          
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

# FY 2004 Accomplishments

-   Performed systems analysis studies to predict new Weapons of Mass
    Destruction (WMD) threats.

-   Stimulated, identified, and executed high-impact projects to address
    long-term resolution of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) issues.

-   Provided long-range analytical support to the warfighter.

-   Developed architectures and capabilities to reduce current and
    emerging threats.

-   Emphasized crosscutting integration and alternative thinking and
    strategies.

# FY 2005 Plans

-   Continue systems analysis studies to predict new WMD threats.

-   Continue to stimulate, identify, and execute high-impact projects to
    address long-term resolution of WMD issues.

-   Continue to provide long-range analytical support to the warfighter.

-   Continue to develop architectures and capabilities to reduce current
    and emerging threats.

-   Continue to emphasize cross-cutting integration and alternative
    thinking and strategies

# FY 2006 Plans

-   Continue systems analysis studies to predict new WMD threats.

-   Continue to stimulate, identify, and execute high-impact projects to
    address long-term resolution of WMD issues.

-   Continue to provide long-range analytical support to the warfighter.

-   Continue to develop architectures and capabilities to reduce current
    and emerging threats

-   Continue to emphasize cross-cutting integration and alternative
    thinking and strategies

# 

# FY 2007 Plans

-   Continue systems analysis studies to predict new WMD threats.

-   Continue to stimulate, identify, and execute high-impact projects to
    address long-term resolution of WMD issues.

-   Continue to provide long-range analytical support to the warfighter.

-   Continue to develop architectures and capabilities to reduce current
    and emerging threats

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue to emphasize cross-cutting integration and alternative
    thinking and strategies

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Infrastructure                       3.1      0        0        0
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

-   Civilian Salaries transferred to O&M.

-   Funding provided for the Defense Threat Reduction Information
    Analysis Center (DTRIAC) continues the collection and preservation
    of the data and knowledge derived during more than 50 years of
    nuclear weapons effects testing and studies. In FY 2005, management
    and funding transferred within DTRA from RDTE,DW to O&M, to
    facilitate the availability and use of data archival, retrieval and
    analysis across the agency.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Modeling and Simulation Program      0        5.3      8.7      8.4
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2005 Plans:**

-   Deliver Integrated Theatre Engagement Model (ITEM) with an initial
    Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Impact Capability.

-   Deliver an Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT)
    capability that provides planning and assessment capability for
    conventional and nuclear targeting along with WMD analysis for net
    centric warfare.

-   Integrate IWMDT services into the Horizontal Fusion Portfolio as the
    Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive, (CBRNE)
    charter member providing shared integrated CBRNE data across the
    Global Information Grid (GiG) and the Shared Collateral Space.

    **FY 2006 Plans:**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Deliver Theatre Engagement Model (ITEM) with a complete Weapons of
    Mass Destruction (WMD) impact capability.

-   Deliver initial Command, Control, Communications, Computers,
    Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance, (C4ISR) implementation
    across Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT)
    enterprise architecture.

-   Deliver initial Simulation integration capability across IWMDT
    enterprise architecture.

-   Deliver initial Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection capability across
    IWMDT enterprise architecture.

    **FY2007 Plans:**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   ITEM has fully integrated multi-user interface and remote access
    capability.

-   Fully integrate C4ISR capability across IWMDT enterprise
    architecture.

-   Fully integrate Simulation capability across IWMDT enterprise
    architecture through external application services-based
    functionality.

-   Fully integrate Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection capability across
    IWMDT enterprise architecture.

-   Deliver initial unconventional assessment capability within IWMDT
    architecture.

    **C. Other Program Funding Summary**: N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  WMD Counterforce Applications        0        3.5      4.0      4.0
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2005 Plans:**

-   Initiate science and technology workshop with National Science
    Foundation for Agent Defeat (AD) technology development.

-   Initiate chemical weapon Agent Defeat (AD) technology research.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development of innovative Agent Defeat payloads.

    **FY 2006 Plans:**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development of innovative AD technologies and their
    weaponization.

-   Initiate development of live agent tunnel test diagnostic
    technology.

-   Initiate applied research program to implement National Science
    Foundation (NSF) R&D recommendation on Biological Weapons (BW) agent
    characterization.

    **FY2007 Plans:**

-   Begin development of augmented directed energy payload.

-   Continue development of live agent tunnel test diagnostic
    technology.

-   Continue BW agent characterization and defeat technology research.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

  -------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**  **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                             2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**   2010**   2011**

  Project BE -- Testing      14.1     13.4     24.7     22.6     22.4     22.9     22.8     22.0
  Technologies & Integration                                                                
  -------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:

-   This project provides a unique national test-bed capability for
    simulated Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) facility
    characterization, weapon-target interaction, and WMD facility defeat
    testing to respond to operational needs.

-   The project develops, provides and maintains test-beds used by the
    DoD, the Services, the Combatant Commanders and other federal
    agencies to evaluate the implications of WMD, conventional, and
    other special weapon use against U.S. military or civilian systems
    and targets.

-   This project leverages fifty years of testing expertise to
    investigate weapons effects and target response across the spectrum
    of hostile environments that could be created by proliferant nations
    or terrorist organizations with access to advanced conventional
    weapons or WMD (nuclear, biological and chemical).

-   Specific programs supported by this project include:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Hard Target Defeat (HTD);

-   Anti-terrorism/Force Protection(AT/FP);

-   CP2 Counterforce Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD);

-   Special Operations Forces (SOF).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   This project maintains testing infrastructure to support:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Warfighters;

-   Other government agencies;

-   Friendly foreign countries testing requirements on a cost
    reimbursable basis.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   This project also develops strategy and planning for a WMD test-bed
    infrastructure focusing on nuclear, biological, and chemical
    facilities, and the hard and deeply buried facilities in which these
    activities are often located.

-   The project provides support for full and sub-scale tests that focus
    on weapon-target interaction with fixed soft and hardened facilities
    to include aboveground facilities, cut-and-cover facilities and deep
    underground tunnels.

-   Specific activities include:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Test-bed design and construction;

-   Instrumentation and data collection;

-   Test coordination and execution;

-   Post-test analysis and documentation.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   This project directly supports:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   PE 0602717BR - Project BC;

-   PE 0602716BR - Projects BD & BF;

-   PE 0603160BR - Projects BJ & BK.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Test and Technology Support          11.5     11.4     12.0     12.1
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**(**Re-titled in FY 2005 from Test-Bed Operation and Support)

## 

## FY 2004 Accomplishments

-   Provided unique testbed capabilities for weapon-target interaction
    and WMD programs. DTRA supported 134 tests for Counterproliferation
    (CP2) Advanced Concept & Technology Demonstrations (ACTD), Hard
    Target Defeat demonstrations, antiterrorism technology, general
    phenomenology and Service support.

-   Provided an inventory of unique targets, infrastructure support, and
    expertise for conduct of major integrated test programs, including
    instrumentation maintenance, gage installation, data recording,
    source diagnosis, environmental support, safety support, experiment
    installation, experiment fielding, and test fielding.

-   Initiated Program Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) process to
    support DTRA in proposed expansion of testing and related activities
    at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR).

-   Stood up new Infrastructure Support Office to standardize logistics,
    operations and support across test sites, including simulators, and
    integrate infrastructure development and improvement.

-   Continued to keep the Large Blast/Thermal Simulator (LB/TS) in
    caretaker status, with limited testing of protective structures

## 

## FY 2005 Plans

-   Continue to provide unique national test-bed capabilities for
    weapon-target interaction and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
    threat reduction programs. Continue to provide testing support.

-   Provide an inventory of unique targets, infrastructure support, and
    expertise for conduct of major integrated test programs, including:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Instrumentation maintenance.

-   Gauge installation.

-   Data recording.

-   Source diagnosis.

-   Environmental support.

-   Safety support.

-   Experiment installation.

-   Experiment fielding.

-   Test fielding.

-   Support Program Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) process to
    support DTRA in proposed expansion of testing and related activities
    at White Sands Missile Range.

-   Integrate new Infrastructure Support Office to standardize
    logistics, operations and support across test sites, including
    simulators, and integrate infrastructure development and
    improvement.

-   Continue to maintain the Large Blast and Thermal Simulator in
    caretaker status, with the ability to conduct curtain wall tests and
    blast tests on short notice

#### 

#### FY 2006 Plans

-   Continue to provide unique national test-bed capabilities for
    weapon-target interaction and WMD threat reduction programs.
    Continue to provide testing support.

-   Continue to maintain the Large Blast and Thermal Simulator in
    caretaker status, with the ability to conduct curtain wall tests and
    blast tests on short notice

####### 

####### FY 2007 Plans

-   Continue to provide unique national test-bed capabilities for
    weapon-target interaction and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
    threat reduction programs. Continue to provide testing support.

-   Continue to maintain the Large Blast and Thermal Simulator in
    caretaker status, with the ability to conduct curtain wall tests and
    blast tests on short notice.

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Infrastructure Development and       0        2.0      2.0      2.0
  Improvement                                                     
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

(Re-titled in FY 2005 from Field Support)

**FY 2005 Plans**

-   Continue to provide infrastructure support for:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Maintenance of government vehicles.

-   Transportation of equipment.

-   Communication.

-   Utilities for facilities.

-   Rental of facilities.

-   Supplies.

-   Custodial service.

-   Procurement of equipment in support of test execution.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Phase II Stallion Control Center Upgrade

-   Chestnut Control Center

    **FY 2006 Plans**

-   Continue to provide infrastructure support for maintenance of
    government vehicles, transportation of equipment, communication,
    utilities for facilities, rental of facilities, supplies, custodial
    service and procurement of equipment in support of test execution.

-   Testbed remediation

-   Buildings to support testing at Permanent High Explosives Test Site
    (PHETS).

    **FY 2007 Plans**

-   Continue to provide infrastructure support for maintenance of
    government vehicles, transportation of equipment, communication,
    utilities for facilities, rental of facilities, supplies, custodial
    service and procurement of equipment in support of test execution.

+------------------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| **Cost (\$ in millions)**          | ####  | ####  | ####  | ####  |
|                                    | ## FY | ## FY | ## FY | ## FY |
|                                    |  2004 |  2005 |  2006 |  2007 |
+------------------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| Environmental Restoration Support  | 2.6   | 0     | 10.7  | 8.5   |
+------------------------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+

> **FY 2004 Accomplishments**

-   Performed testbed cleanup and remediation as part of post-test
    activities at Nevada Test Site (NTS) locations.

-   Performed testbed cleanup and remediation as part of post-test
    activities at the Chestnut Site, Kirtland Air Force Base, New
    Mexico.

#### 

#### FY 2006 Plans

-   Provide needed Environmental Restoration support for Defense Threat
    Reduction Agency (DTRA) Nevada Test Site (NTS) locations in
    accordance with the Federal Facilities Agreement and Consent Order
    (FFACO) between the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
    (NDEP), the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the
    DTRA; and at other locations as needed.

-   Conduct Environmental Site Assessment for DTRA locations on Kirtland
    Air Force Base, New Mexico.

#### 

#### FY 2007 Plans

-   Continue to provide needed Environmental Restoration support for
    DTRA NTS locations in accordance with the FFACO between the NDEP,
    the NNSA, and the DTRA; and at other locations as needed.

**C**. **Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy**: Acquisition of Environmental Restoration
Support is normally through an Interagency Cost Reimbursable Order
(IACRO) to the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site
Office (NNSA/NSO) and/or through Military Interdepartmental Purchase
Requests (MIPRs) to the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
(AFCEE) or the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC).

**E. Major Performers: Approximately \$2.1M of FY 2004 funding was
obligated with Applied Research Associates, Inc, located in New Mexico,
and \$2.4M of FY 2004 funding was obligated with the Department of
Energy/Nevada Operations. Funding was obligated in direct support of
Project BE -- Testing Technologies and Integration.**

+-------------------------+----+----+-----+----+----+----+----+----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ## | ## | ##  | ## | ## | ## | ## | ## |
| millions)**             | ## | ## | ### | ## | ## | ## | ## |  F |
|                         | ## | ## | # F | ## | ## | ## | ## | Y  |
|                         |  F |  F | Y 2 |  F |  F |  F |  F | 20 |
|                         | Y  | Y  | 006 | Y  | Y  | Y  | Y  | 11 |
|                         | 20 | 20 |     | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |    |
|                         | 04 | 05 |     | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 |    |
+-------------------------+----+----+-----+----+----+----+----+----+
| Project BF -- CP        | 44 | 91 | 9   | 98 | 1  | 1  | 1  | 1  |
| Operational Warfighter  | .2 | .2 | 4.2 | .1 | 00 | 03 | 07 | 10 |
| Support                 |    |    |     |    | .4 | .8 | .5 | .0 |
+-------------------------+----+----+-----+----+----+----+----+----+

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification**:

The CP Operational Warfighter Support project provides the bridge
between the WMD Defeat Technology base and operational and intelligence
community needs. The overall project goal is to support the Joint Chiefs
of Staff (JCS), the warfighting Combatant Commanders and
Services/agencies engaged in countering WMD threats and to protect the
U.S. and its allies against military or terrorist use of WMD. This
project develops hard and deeply buried target defeat technology,
provides targeting and Intelligence Community (IC) support, exercises
WMD Defeat Technology and products with the users, develops DoD
compliant simulations that exploit counterproliferation (CP) models for
target planning and collateral effects prediction, and demonstrates WMD
defeat capabilities in operationally realistic environments. The
technical approach is to integrate technologies developed in other WMD
defeat projects, to conduct a full spectrum of tests to verify
capability enhancement, to expose customers to these capabilities in
exercises, wargames and demonstrations, to integrate WMD defeat
technologies into customer operations, and to support use of these
capabilities during contingency operations. These three areas are: 1)
Operational Support Technology, 2) Hard Target Defeat (HTD) Program and
3) Special Projects (previously accounted for in Hard Target Defeat
Program).

-   **Operational Support Technology**. The Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Assessment and Analysis Center (WMDAAC) provides the warfighter with
    the capabilities and understanding for countering the use and effect
    of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) through the advancement of
    simulation technology, assessment of operational impact, development
    of collaborative capabilities and access to mature computer models.
    Specifically: (1) WMDAAC develops advanced simulations from
    first-principles physics models produced in other projects in this
    program element (extensively Project BD). WMDAAC personnel provide
    an interface between DTRA model developers and the weapons effects
    simulation community to ensure maximum utility of DTRA models in
    distributed interactive simulations through compliance with C4ISR &
    High-Level Architecture (HLA) standards and protocols documented in
    Federation Object Models; (2) WMDAAC uses these advanced simulations
    to assist the warfighter in quantifiably assessing operational
    theater plans and post-attack warfighting effectiveness and to
    develop alternatives to mitigate the effects of WMD; (3) WMDAAC
    develops and adapts capabilities to project information through
    advanced visualization techniques and advanced collaboration at
    widely dispersed locations including Combat Commanders. Commercial
    and government-developed technologies are selected and proven in a
    research environment, and then transitioned to the DTRA Operations
    Center and/or other warfighter customers; and (4) WMDAAC provides
    warfighters and first responders with ready access to mature
    computer models, WMD databases and expert field assistance and
    training. The end result is to provide more realistic models and
    simulations of the effects of WMD for use in training, analysis,
    experimentation, operational environments and acquisition. In FY
    2004, the WMDAAC will open the Weapons of Mass Effect (WME) Battle
    Laboratory. The WME Battle Lab is a natural "next step" in the
    evolution of WMDAAC's simulation and collaboration technology
    development activities. These activities, combined with its
    operations research capability, will provide a resource which will
    enable the warfighter to better understand the effects of WME and
    refine concepts of operation and battle plans.

-   **Hard Target Defeat Program**. The United States and its allies
    face a growing threat related to critical military targets hidden
    within and shielded by hardened, deeply buried tunnel complexes.
    These complexes may house biological/chemical/nuclear weapons
    production or storage facilities; command, control, and
    communications facilities; and/or theater ballistic missiles with
    their transporter-erector-launchers (TELs). An objective of this
    project is to examine the existing U.S. and Allied capabilities to
    hold hardened, deeply buried tunnel targets at risk. Deficiencies
    and technology gaps will be identified and the ability of planned
    systems to address them will be assessed. Finally, new technologies
    needed to mitigate remaining shortfalls will be evaluated as
    candidates. Promising concepts are selected for new hard target
    defeat technology development tasks. These tasks support warfighting
    requirements derived from the Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat
    capstone requirements document and research, development, test and
    evaluation (RDT&E) priorities set by the Office of the Under
    Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (OUSD
    (AT&L). Funds added for FY05 and beyond are a result of the
    Secretary of Defense strategic review for FY 2002 when this review
    found the baseline investments in this area as insufficient in FY05
    and beyond to develop the technologies identified in the Hard and
    Deeply Buried Target Defeat (HDBTD) Science and Technology (S&T)
    Master Plan. Initiatives included in the S&T Master Plan included
    development of advanced energetics programs, development of concepts
    and technologies for tunnel defeat weapons, and increased level of
    effort in tunnel defeat testing to improve weapons effects modeling
    for penetration and weapon lethality. This area supports the Joint
    Functional Concept of Battlespace Awareness and Force Application
    and the Quadrennial Defense Review transformational Goal to Deny
    Enemy Sanctuary by developing and demonstrating technologies to
    strengthen joint and combined warfighting capabilities useful in the
    Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). Supported Transformational Sub-Goals
    within "deny enemies sanctuary" are small-diameter munitions and
    defeat of hard and deeply buried targets.

> The following paragraphs describe the two major functional areas
> needed to develop target defeat capabilities and support warfighter
> operations: attack technologies, and tunnel defeat testing.

-   **Attack Technologies**. As input to the defeat assessment component
    of target defeat, physics-based models for all relevant weapons
    effects and weapon-target interactions are being developed. Specific
    technology areas being updated include warhead penetration into
    intact and damaged rock, tunnel collapse near the portal area,
    in-tunnel effects (including airblast, fragmentation, heat, and
    electromagnetic pulse), blast door response, and the fragility of
    critical and vulnerable equipment. The models will incorporate
    effects from weapons currently in the inventory as well as more
    advanced defeat concepts. Activities in the technology development
    area include first principle calculations, numerical simulations,
    laboratory testing, precision small-scale experiments, fast-running
    engineering model development, and full-scale field tests at several
    test ranges. The algorithms and methodology comprising the tunnel
    defeat models are being submitted for accreditation to the Joint
    Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness (JTCG/ME).
    New more lethal defeat options for Hard and Deeply Buried Targets
    (HDBTs) like the massive ordnance penetrator, that can overwhelm
    target characterization uncertainties, are being developed and
    demonstrated to provide a 10x increase in weapon lethality and
    improved penetration capability compared to inventory weapons. In
    partnership with the Air Force, a weapon-borne battle damage
    information transmitter that attaches to Bomb Live Unit (BLU)-109
    penetrators is being developed and demonstrated to provide impact
    location, penetration path, and fuze function information to the
    global information grid. This information is required to provide a
    needed capability to make a quick predictive assessment of the
    weapon effectiveness on the target based on the actual weapon
    delivery information. Additional activities include advanced
    energetic and non-energetic weapons. Thermobaric weapons are
    examples of advanced energetic weapons. Non-energetic weapons do not
    use blast as the defeat mechanism.

-   **Tunnel Defeat Testing.** This testing acquires data to better
    understand weapons effects phenomenology and is used to develop
    models and attack options for defeating tunnels. The effectiveness
    of the improved end-to-end defeat capability for tunnels is being
    demonstrated in a series of three operational exercises being
    conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Each exercise will consist
    of tunnel defeat testing and analyses conducted in the context of an
    attack on a particular type of tunnel target complex. Phase 1 is
    associated with tunnel complexes housing theater ballistic missiles
    Tactical Ballistic Missiles (TBMs), their Transporter-erector
    launchers (TELs), and other support equipment. Phase 2 will
    represent Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I)
    centers housed in tunnels. Phase 3 will be associated with Weapons
    of Mass Destruction (WMD) production and storage facilities. Each
    demonstration phase includes facility definition, tunnel
    construction and outfitting, simulated target system operations and
    related data collection, attack planning, test execution, battle
    damage assessment and repair and assessment of test results. All the
    tests are being conducted within the context of a realistic
    operational scenario involving the use of end-to-end defeat planning
    tools and procedures with current and advanced weapons, sensors, and
    platforms. These tests will demonstrate the effectiveness of each of
    these elements against realistic tunnel targets.

> A supplemental tunnel defeat demonstration series at White Sands
> Missile Range (WSMR), referred to as "WSMR Portals," is currently
> being planned to address important hard target defeat demonstration
> requirements that will not be met by the exercises at NTS. These
> requirements include realistic air operational tactics, stand-off
> weapons, geologies with granite rock, and the ability to apply
> stand-off air-to-ground weapons, artillery, Multiple Rocket Launch
> System (MRLS), and tactical missiles against tunnel facilities. In
> addition to being of great interest to the warfighters, meeting these
> requirements will create numerous test opportunities for emerging
> projects in advanced weapons, for example thermobaric weapon concepts.

-   **Special Projects.** The Special Projects effort is an outgrowth of
    the targeting and characterization work previously performed under
    the Hard Target Defeat Program. Accomplishments and funding for FY
    2004 are shown under the Hard Target Defeat Program's Attack
    Technologies. Starting with FY 2005, all funding and milestones will
    be shown under Special Projects. Many of our potential adversaries
    have invested considerable resources and effort in protecting their
    critical military infrastructure from attack by building concealed,
    hardened and deeply buried facilities. While complete physical
    destruction may be desired, for some hard and deeply buried targets
    this effect isn't practicable with current weapons and employment
    techniques. It may be possible, however, to deny or disrupt the
    mission or function of a facility. Functional defeat is facilitated
    through better data collection and intelligence preparation against
    the potential targets. The defeat process includes finding and
    identifying a facility, characterizing its function and physical
    layout, determining its vulnerabilities to available weapons,
    planning an attack, applying force, assessing damage, and, if
    necessary, suppressing reconstitution efforts and re‑striking the
    facility. Special Projects supports the Intelligence Community and
    the Combatant Commands by providing technologies and processes to
    find and characterize hard and deeply buried targets and then assess
    the results of attacks against those targets. Overall objectives are
    to develop new methodologies, processes and technological
    applications for detecting, locating, identifying, physically and
    functionally characterizing, modeling, and assessing new and
    existing hard and deeply buried targets to support full dimensional
    defeat operations. Special Projects consists of two subordinate and
    related activities, Targeting and Intelligence Community (T&IC)
    support and the new Find, Characterize, Assess (FCA) technology
    development activity.

-   **Targeting and Intelligence Community (T&IC) Support.** This
    activity enables the functional or physical defeat of hard and
    deeply buried targets by developing and employing a variety of
    resources and techniques to find and precisely locate facilities and
    identifying critical features, functions, components and
    vulnerabilities. T&IC Support directly provides the Intelligence
    Community with the geological, structural and functional analysis
    necessary to effectively support the employment of current weapons
    and newly developed techniques for defeat of hard and deeply buried
    targets. This activity will also help achieve more efficient use of
    weapons and delivery platforms by providing difficult-to-obtain
    Combat Assessment of attacks on underground facilities. The T&IC
    activity provides the first critical step toward denying the enemy
    sanctuary in hard and deeply buried facilities. This approach
    directly results in accomplishment of our objective by providing
    timely and accurate target characterizations to the warfighters and
    Intelligence Community. Specific T&IC efforts include continued
    development of the Underground Targeting and Analysis System (UTAS)
    software suite used for characterization and modeling of hard and
    deeply buried targets and relocation and periodic upgrade of the
    Hard Target Research and Analysis Center (HTRAC) where this software
    is used by DTRA and supporting contractors to analyze and assess
    targets for the Intelligence Community.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **Find, Characterize, Assess (FCA) Technology Development.** The new
    Find, Characterize, Assess (FCA) activity serves as the technology
    base for the Target and Intelligence Community (T&IC) support
    activity by selecting, developing, testing and demonstrating
    promising technologies to help the warfighter and the Intelligence
    Community detect, locate, identify, characterize and assess hard and
    deeply buried targets. The FCA activity provides the technical means
    and methods required by the T&IC Support activity. Promising
    technology applications and hardware will be transitioned to the
    Services or the Intelligence Community for acquisition and
    integration. New processes and techniques developed through this
    effort will be transitioned directly into the Intelligence Community
    through our T&IC Support activity. The principal efforts to be
    executed under the FCA Technology Development activity include
    continued development and of geotechnical characterization data,
    tools and models; development of specialized sensors and data for
    post-attack assessment of targets; development and integration of
    new planning tools; and integration and improvement of related
    databases. Specific geotechnical efforts include delivery of area
    geology characterizations, development of site characterization
    methodologies and delivery of site-specific geology
    characterizations and development of methodologies for assessing
    post-attack effects. The goal of the Sensors and Signatures
    technology development effort is to develop a sensor and related
    signatures library to support pre-attack characterization and
    post-attack assessment of HDBT function and status. Analytical Tools
    development efforts will focus on development and integration of a
    sensor planning tool to facilitate the employment of sensors for the
    characterization of selected hard and deeply buried targets and
    development of a Human Intelligence (HUMINT) automated interview
    tool to improve the speed and accuracy of the HUMINT collection
    process for UGFs. Finally, database improvements will progressively
    integrate these new tools and databases together into a
    comprehensive family of systems. This activity will result in
    fielding of sensors, supporting tools, data, and processes, for
    locating, identifying and characterizing underground facilities.
    Successful execution of this activity will fill a recognized
    capability gap in support of Combatant Command and Intelligence
    Community Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat (HDBTD) Find,
    Characterize and Assess objectives.

> **B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Operational Support Technology       9.4      9.3      8.7      8.9
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

> **FY 2004 Accomplishments:**

-   Opened the Weapons of Mass Effect (WME) Battle Laboratory

-   Demonstrated the utility of a WME Urban Dispersion Model for use and
    re-use in a collaborative 4-Dimensional (x, y, z, and time)
    simulation environment for integration into the Global Command &
    Control System for Combatant Commander application and use.

-   Established network-centric capabilities for the Commercial
    Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Chemical Biological Response Aide (CoBRA), a
    tool for DoD and other federal agencies to deal with and report on
    WME incidents.

-   Continued the education and training role through participation in
    selected Joint, Combatant Commands and service school exercises,
    experiments and wargames.

-   Integrated high-fidelity physics-based models and simulations with
    international partners.

-   Sustained collaborative and reachback capabilities to support DTRA's
    role in satisfying emerging warfighter and homeland security
    requirements.

-   Expanded our support of other federal agencies as directed in the
    war against terrorists as it pertains to Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) issues exploiting
    information technology with assured security.

-   Supported the Homeland Security Command and Control Advanced Concept
    and Technology Demonstrations (ACTD) Demonstration.

-   Maintained a Back-up/Alternate Reachback Center at Kirtland AFB,
    providing uninterrupted access to DTRA services and information
    databases, should the primary facilities in Alexandria, VA, become
    unusable for any reason.

-   Established Coordination and Engineering Service Agreements with US
    Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) J7 Joint National Training Capability
    (JNTC) Joint Management Office (JMO), Joint C4ISR Battle Center
    (JBC- reports to J8), and J9 Joint Experimentation Directorate to
    provide CBRNE-focused modeling and simulation and subject matter
    expert support to Transformation and Joint Concept Development and
    Experimentation (JCDE) activities/events

-   Developed and coordinated a multidirectorate Technology Development
    Directorate, Combat Support Directorate, Advanced Systems and
    Concepts Office, Implementation Plan to provide DTRA support to
    Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCDE).

-   Initiated DTRA-wide experimentation concept plan.

-   Developed the Technology Development Directorate Modeling &
    Simulation Plan.

-   Continue to provide white-cell reachback support to the Unified
    Defense and Determined Promise annual exercises

-   Continue participation in the Joint Forces Command exercise series,
    with focus on integrating coalition Weapons of Mass Effect (WME)
    expertise with DTRA modeling and simulation.

> **FY 2005 Plans**

-   Complete design and installation of information technology
    infrastructure for WME Battle Lab.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Focus on integrating coalition WME expertise with DTRA modeling and
    simulation through continued participation in the Joint Forces
    Command experimentation series

-   Continue to provide white-cell reachback support to the Unified
    Defense and Determined Promise annual exercises.

-   Complete Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive
    (CBRNE) Object Model version core set of data elements required by
    high-resolution weapons and collateral effects simulations.

-   Establish initial operating capability for Weapons Analysis
    Lethality Toolset (WALTS) version 2. The tool will support force
    protection and consequence management exercises, real-world events,
    weapons effectiveness evaluations, and examination of foreign system
    vulnerabilities.

-   Continue development, injection, and integration of advanced WME
    modeling and simulation capabilities into warfighter C4ISR
    architecture.

-   Continue to build and strengthen DTRA's role in the testing and use
    of networks and simulations required to support:

    -   U.S. Joint Forces Command/Joint Concept Development and
        Experimentation (EAD)USJFCOM/J9's Distributed Continuous
        Experimentation Environment (DCEE).

    -   U.S. Joint Forces Command/Joint Training (EAD) USJFCOM/J7's
        live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) component development.

-   Integration/interoperability of DTRA LVC modeling and simulation
    (M&S) systems into the training environment.

-   Provide a virtual DTRA presence at Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS),
    USJFCOM, and Joint National Training Center exercises by remotely
    introducing WME events and projecting them onto a common operational
    picture Battlespace.

-   Use M&S to formulate and test alternatives to mitigate the effects
    of WME.

-   Deliver prototype Joint Operational Effects Federation demonstrating
    the combination of a hazard prediction model with a base operations
    simulation.

-   Conduct Modeling and Simulation (M&S) verification and validation
    testing of Weapons of Mass Effect (WME) related software development
    and life-cycle maintenance activities.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct WME research and development (R&D) by prototyping, testing,
    evaluating, demonstrating, and distributing applied technology
    products and operational reachback capabilities in support of the
    Combatant Commands, Services, DoD agencies, and federal
    organizations in conducting incident assessment and management.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   As a Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) Joint Management
    Office (JMO) Development Partner, support research, design and
    technical development of Chemical, Biological, Radiological,
    Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) and Joint National Training
    Capability (JNTC) architectures, with the goal of certifying the
    DTRA WME Battle Lab for JNTC use.

-   Participate in/support JNTC exercises and Joint Concept Development
    and Experimentation (JCDE) experiments/events/activities that would
    benefit most from increased consideration of CBRNE considerations,
    to include Joint Urban Operations and Multinational events.

-   Integrate Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (WMDT) into
    selected JNTC exercises and JCDE experiments/events/activities to
    support Integrated Weapons of Mass Destruction Toolset (IWMDT)
    design, testing, and verification and validation.

####### FY 2006 Plans

-   Obtain JNTC training site certification for the WME Battle Lab.

-   Expand DTRA Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, High
    Explosive (CBRNE)-focused participation in Joint Forces
    Command/Commander JFCOM-led JCDE Joint Prototype and Joint Concept
    Development path efforts, including support to Effects Based
    Operations, Joint Interagency Coordination Group and Operational Net
    Assessment.

-   Deliver initial Simulation integration capability across IWMDT
    enterprise architecture.

-   Integrate Weapons Analysis Lethality Tool Set (WALTS) into service
    training ranges.

-   Expand DTRA participation in the Joint Capabilities Integration and
    Development System (JCIDS)

####### 

####### FY 07 Plans:

-   Fully integrate the WME Battlelab with the JNTC training network, to
    include Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive
    (CBRNE) engineering/technical advice and support, warfighting tools,
    military/net assessments, field demos and tests, and advanced
    concept validation.

-   Continue expanding participation with JFCOM for JCDE, Distributed
    Continuous Experimentation Environment (DCEE), Joint (C4ISR) Battle
    Center, (JBC), and JCIDS prototypes, to include a full spectrum of
    modeling & simulation modules for Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) (using IWMDT), to
    include supporting the Chemical Biological Defense Program (CBDP).

-   Expand support to the U.S. strategic deterrent, mission assurance/
    Force Protection, consequence management, and homeland defense.

-   Begin integration planning for transition to the Global Information
    Grid (GIG).

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Hard Target Defeat Program           21.4     67.2     67.1     68.8
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

## FY 2004 Accomplishments

-   Formulated and tested new explosive mixtures in penetrating warheads
    optimized for use against tunnels and chemical and biological
    targets.

-   Completed lab-scale tests and developed delivery concepts for
    weapons with non-energetic warhead fills

-   Investigated fundamental properties of thermobarics

-   Continued development of high fidelity computational fluid dynamics
    models for thermobarics performance and lethality

-   Developed improved reactive materials for higher lethality

-   Identified mission critical equipment and vulnerabilities for WMD
    production tunnel facilities.

-   Initiated a feasibility study for a boosted penetrator that will
    penetrate at least 50% more than current weapons.

-   Continue development of defeat technologies to model and predict the
    extent of multiple weapons penetration, tunnel damage, and advanced
    weapon performance.

-   Continued development of high-payoff novel explosive concepts using
    advanced energetic material to enable defeat of targets currently
    invulnerable to weapons solutions.

-   Completed Deep Digger laboratory technology verification
    experiments, and conduct preliminary design review for prototype
    design and transfer the technology to the Army.

-   Continued development of system fragility and response models for
    Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) equipment.

-   Developed tunnel aim point optimization models to increase the
    effectiveness of the planning tools developed for warfighter
    planners.

-   Continued assessments of hostile facilities based on JCS and
    Combatant Commanders priorities. Details are classified.

-   Develop improved weapon/target interaction models of tunnels and
    liners to nuclear ground shock environments. Incorporated these
    models in the MEA planning tool.

-   Released MEA 5.0.

-   Planned a massive ordnance airblast lethality test.

-   Initiated the massive ordnance penetration technology demonstration.

-   Supported HDBT defeat planning with Targeting/Weaponeering
    Assistance Cell.

-   Successfully completed first 12-month effort within Phase I for
    Non-Energetic Advanced Payload Fills program.

-   Developed an 84mm Multi-Target Shoulder Launched penetrating round
    for SOCOM.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Developed and validated remote site geologic characterization
    technology.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Incorporated initial nuclear and conventional weapons effects
    analysis and initial network analysis into the UTAS software.

-   Support targeting and IC by conducting assessments of hostile
    facilities based on JCS and Combatant Commanders priorities.

-   Completed six geotechnical templates for hard and deeply buried
    target characterization.

-   Characterized targets and developed additional three-dimensional
    target models for delivery to Combatant Commands and the IC.

-   Documented lessons learned from Red-Blue-White exercise.

-   Initiated WMD material assessment concept demonstration.

-   Analyzed Operation Iraqi Freedom Bomb Damage Assessment (BDA) data
    for ground truth comparison to characterizations and assessments
    delivered during operations.

-   Developed final slope model for geologic template methodology.

-   Compiled results from 8-Site Geotechnical Validation Study.

-   Improved streamlined procedures for characterization of deep
    geology.

-   Initiated concept development for find, characterize and assess
    technologies and planning tools.

-   Initiated development of the Sensor Deployment Planning Tool.

-   Continued research on the use of Conventional Explosive Radio
    Frequency (CERF) as a potential means to conduct Bomb Damage
    Assessment (BDA).

-   Initiated DTRA support of the National Signatures Program.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed construction of tunnel portals and tunnel at the White
    Sands Missile Range.

-   Using newly developed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs),
    conducted DIVINE WARHAWK operational tunnel defeat demonstrations
    against tunnel portals using inventory and new standoff weapons at
    the White Sands Missile Range.

-   Developed a conceptual design of the Improved 500 lb (I-500)
    penetrator to defeat HTBTs.

-   Planned a demonstration of massive ordnance bomb against a tunnel
    facility at the White Sands Missile Range.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conducted functional defeat operational demonstrations on the
    Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) tunnel
    complex to be constructed at the Nevada Test Site.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conducted MIDWAY EMERALD tests of joint Advanced Tactical Munitions
    System-Penetrator (ATACMS-P) weapon against a target at White Sands
    Missile Range in support of ATACMS-P Advanced Concept Technology
    Demonstration (ACTD).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conducted demonstrations and evaluations of sensor technologies to
    improve bomb damage assessment (BDA) of functional attacks on tunnel
    facilities

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed signature data collection of long operational tunnel
    facility complex at White Sands Missile Range.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Selected and implemented enhanced CBR protection technologies into
    an existing building in Maryland for Project Ancile

-   Performed weapons effects assessment for current and concept weapons
    for OSD Acquisition Technology and Logistics (AT&L) to support the
    Strategic Capabilities Assessment.

-   Supported OSD (AT&L) by drafting the 2004 Hard and Deeply Buried
    Target Defeat Report to Congress

-   Conducted joint test and evaluation of lethality of high speed
    penetrator warhead against a DTRA test bed (Tactical Missile System
    Penetrator (TACMS-P).

    **FY 2005 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development of optimized explosive formulations;
    down-select most promising formulations for more extensive testing.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct methodology down-select and complete Phase I report of
    non-energetic fill concepts.

-   Collect experimental data on new model of thermobaric explosive
    (TBX) formulations and refine TBX metrics.

-   Enhance model of coupled combustion and flow in TB detonations.

-   Identify TBX weapon concepts for use against hard and deeply buried
    targets.

-   Continue investigation of Aluminum combustion mechanisms; apply to
    (TBX) formulation improvement.

-   Develop formulation design techniques for improved energy coupling
    to targets.

-   Develop improved explosive formulations based on use of coated
    micron- and/or nano-particles.

-   Begin development of reactive structural materials suitable for use
    in penetrating warheads or against chem./bio or surface targets.

-   Conduct multiple Proof of Principle field tests for Non-Energetic
    Advanced Payload Fills.

-   Down select best 1 or 2 performing non-energetic fills for use in
    conventional Bomb Live Unit (BLU)-109 and Mark (MK)-84 munitions.

-   Conduct weapon qualification testing for the 84mm Multi-Target
    Shoulder Launched round for Special Operations Command (U.S) SOCOM
    to include multiple fill analysis.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Assess data from field impact tests of projectiles with unstable
    trajectory.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Develop weapon system survivability model for horizontal (skip bomb)
    delivery.

-   Develop algorithm for weapon trajectory stability in horizontal
    (skip bomb) delivery.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Analyze High Velocity (HV) penetration lab data evaluating oblique
    impacts of novel case shapes.

-   Analyze effectiveness of massive penetration against hard and deeply
    buried targets and complete preliminary design.

-   Initiate hypervelocity penetration lethality demonstration.

-   Complete the feasibility study of the boosted penetrator.

-   Develop portal extension engineering response model.

-   Update tunnel portal closure model for smaller diameter (vent-size)
    openings.

-   Integrate fragment model with 1.5D (Dimension) airblast model for
    Munitions Effects Assessment (MEA) 6.0.

-   Assess experimental data for development & validation of
    vent-related airblast models.

-   Develop methodology to assess equipment fragility based on generic
    characterization.

-   Develop equipment fragility model for Munitions Effects Assessment
    (MEA) 6.0.

-   Obtain Joint Technical Coordinating Group (JTCG)-accreditation of
    High Performance Computing and Integrated Munitions Effects
    Assessment (HPC + IMEA) equipment fragility model for Command,
    Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) type tunnel.

-   Improve blast door model and release Munitions Effects Assessment
    (MEA) 6.0.

-   Design prototype submunition and sensor to disrupt tunnel
    operations.

-   Accelerate development of high-payoff novel explosive concepts using
    advanced energetic materials to enable defeat of targets currently
    invulnerable to weapons solutions.

-   Update nuclear planning tool Munitions Effects Assessment
    (MEA)-Nuclear.

-   Execute two intermediate scale tests to develop and validate high
    performance computer (HPC) models of tunnel facilities to sever
    ground shock loading. Begin the design of a full-scale test to
    validate the HPC models.

-   Support COCOM HDBT defeat planning with the Targeting/Weaponeering
    Assistance Cell.

-   Provide 100 detailed hard target defeat weaponeering recommendations
    to warfighters

-   Provide 6 hard target defeat training sessions to warfighters.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct DIVINE WARHAWK deep underground operational tunnel facility
    defeat demonstrations using advanced weapons at the White Sands
    Missile Range.

-   Conduct DIVINE HELCAT reconstitution exercise and determine
    reconstitution time for C3I tunnel facility at Nevada Test Site
    (NTS).

-   Complete design of simulated WMD production and storage tunnel
    complex.

-   Begin planning for DIVINE HATES WMD production and storage tunnel
    complex functional defeat.

-   Begin planning for near-term integrated functional defeat
    demonstrations against multiple tunnel complexes.

-   Execute static lethality tests of the I-500 weapon concepts against
    tunnel targets. Begin detailed system design.

-   Conduct joint test and evaluation of lethality of high-speed
    penetrator warhead against a DTRA test bed (Tactical Missile
    System - Penetrator (TACMS-P).

-   Conduct joint test and evaluation of lethality of an Advanced
    Tactical Munition System (ATACMS) with a Stand-off Land Attack
    Missile (SLAM) warhead against a reinforced concrete frame structure
    test bed.

-   Conduct small-scale multistory building tests and model development.

-   Develop and validate coupled weapon penetration and deformation
    model.

-   Develop weapon penetration model for damaged materials.

-   Refine Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) concept and begin detailed
    weapon development and testing

-   Conduct Enhanced Fuze Integrated BDI Demonstration (EFIBDID) system
    design and tests.

-   Develop coupled Tunnel AirBlast (TAB) model, validate it, and
    integrate with Munitions Effects Assessment (MEA).

-   Conduct tunnel target defeat demonstrations with US Navy assets and
    weapons.

-   Perform weapons effects assessment for current and concept weapons
    for OSD Acquisition Technology and Logistics (AT&L) to support the
    Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat HDBTD weapon acquisition.

-   Support OSD (AT&L) by drafting the 2005 Hard and Deeply Buried
    Target Defeat Report to Congress

-   Conduct statically emplaced Proof-of Principle test of effectiveness
    of Massive Ordnance Penetrator payload.

-   Conduct demonstration of massive ordnance lethality against a
    full-scale tunnel target.

    **FY 2006 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Synthesize and scale-up nitrogen fluoride (NF2) compounds.

-   Apply coated micron- or nano-particles to weapon payloads.

-   Begin to demonstrate most promising TBX in large-scale tests (hard
    and deeply buried target, tunnel, or responding structure).

-   Begin development of general purpose Enhanced Blast Explosives (EBX)
    to improve next-generation TBX performance and expand its potential
    for use against an expanded target set.

-   Continue development of reactive structural materials (RSM); begin
    development of techniques for weapon system integration of RSM.

-   Begin concept demonstration and effectiveness tests for high-payoff
    energetic concepts

-   Downselect to most promising chemical/biological agent defeat
    technologies based on mid-scale testing and begin scale-up of
    promising candidate materials/technologies.

-   Develop and test at least two advanced formulations of high-energy
    survivable penetrator fills (Mach 1 to 4 impact velocities).

-   Begin sub-scale demonstration tests with most promising reactive
    structural materials.

-   Conduct 1/3 scale testing of down-selected Non-Energetic Advanced
    Payload Fills

-   Develop model and perform calculations for non-energetic payloads.

-   Downselect novel Kinetic Energy (KE) gun propellant formulation.

-   Perform static tests of advanced payload concepts to quantify
    effects and target lethality and analyze results.

-   Evaluate results of advanced energetic and non-energetic payload
    development tests and analyses.

-   Conduct static lethality demonstration of massive ordnance
    penetrator against hard and deeply buried targets

-   Complete development of the prototype egress denial system concept,
    and produce and deliver test assets for advanced technology
    demonstration.

-   Deliver Munitions Effects Assessment Version 7.0

-   Verify shock harness of weapon-borne Battle Damage Indicator
    component.

-   Support Component Command (COCOM) Hard and Deeply Buried Target
    (HDBT) defeat planning with Targeting/Weaponeering Assistance Cell

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete construction and outfitting of Facility 3, WMD
    production/storage tunnel facility.

-   Conduct operations at Facility 3 for sensor data collections.

-   Initiate WMD operational defeat demonstrations using the Facility 3
    testbed.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete testing and demonstrations at the egress denial testbed.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate construction of the integrated demonstration test bed for
    mid-term technology.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate planning, siting, and design of a tunnel test bed to
    support the development, testing, and evaluation of S&T weapons
    concepts employing mid- to long-term advanced payload technology for
    defeat of internal critical elements.

-   Conduct large-scale multistory building testing and model
    Verification & Validation (V&V) efforts.

-   Conduct Massive Ordnance Penetrator scaled penetration and lethality
    testing

-   Demonstrate components of key BDI technologies for Enhanced Fuze
    Integrated BDI Demonstration (EFIBDID)

-   Complete detailed system design of the I-500. Perform system level
    and flight tests.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Provide 100 target weaponeering recommendations to
    Targeting/Weaponeering Assistance Cell (TWAC).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Provide 6 hard target defeat training sessions to warfighters.

    **FY 2007 Plans**

-   Deliver and validate equipment fragility and other defeat models for
    weapons of mass destruction (WMD) tunnel facilities.

-   Complete the development of a reconstitution model of WMD facility.

-   Evaluate tunnel damage and in-tunnel effects of advanced weapon
    fills.

-   Demonstrate weapon sensors to facilitate bomb damage assessment
    (BDA) analysis.

-   Complete system fragility evaluation of WMD equipment.

-   Investigate new weapon technology concepts to support start of hard
    deeply buried target defeat (HDBTD) advanced concept technology
    demonstration (ACTD) in FY08.

-   Analyze results of egress denial demonstrations.

-   Conduct Massive Ordnance Penetrator Demonstration.

-   Continue development of general purpose EBX, compare effectiveness
    in expanded target set conditions vs. conventional High Explosives
    (HE) and latest TBX.

-   Demonstrate most promising reactive structural materials in
    large-scale tests and begin technology transition.

-   Demonstrate most promising high-payoff novel energetics concepts in
    sub-scale tests and begin warhead integration concept development.

-   Demonstrate promising high-energy survivable penetrator fills in
    large-scale tests (tunnel or hardened structure) and begin
    technology transition.

-   Demonstrate most promising chemical/biological agent defeat
    technologies in large-scale tests and begin technology transition.

-   Demonstrate novel energetic material with tuned energy release (40%
    increase in Kinetic Energy (KE), 40% vulnerability reduction).

-   Determine effectiveness of additional advanced weapon concepts and
    incorporate results into and release Munitions Effects/Effectiveness
    Assessment (HPC +IMEA) Munitions Effects Assessment (MEA) 8.0.

-   Demonstrate most promising non-energetic advanced payload fills in
    large-scale testing.

-   Begin transition of technology into smaller dynamic applications
    which support defeat of hardened facilities.

-   Demonstrate most promising non-energetic advanced payload fills in
    biological defeat applications.

-   Continue defeat demonstration testing at WMD tunnel facility.

-   Continue evaluations of other/additional weapon/sensor systems.

-   Complete construction of the integrated demonstration testbed and
    initiate the find and characterize phases of the demonstration.

-   Initiate construction of the internal tunnel defeat testbed.

-   Conduct full-scale Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) performance
    demonstration against realistic hard and deeply buried targets

-   Conduct full scale Enhanced Fuze Integrated BDI Demonstration
    EFIBDID demonstrations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Provide 100 target weaponeering recommendations to
    Targeting/Weaponeering Assistance Cell (TWAC).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Provide 6 hard target defeat training sessions to warfighters.

-   Support OSD (AT&L) by drafting the 2006 Hard and Deeply Buried
    Target Defeat Report to Congress.

-   Conduct first large scale testing of weapons against bunkers under
    multi-story buildings.

  --------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**               **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                          2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  Special Projects                        13.4     14.7     18.4     20.4
  --------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

> FY 2004 accomplishments captured under Hard Target Defeat Program.

**FY 2005 Plans**

-   Continue and enhance engineering characterization of targets and
    develop improved three-dimensional target models for delivery to
    Combatant Commands and the IC.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Enhance Underground Targeting and Analysis System (UTAS)
    network-wide functional defeat and special operations planning and
    target visualization functionality.

-   Conduct an Underground Vulnerability Assessment (Red-Blue-White)
    exercise.

-   Offer four basic and one advanced Underground Facility (UGF)
    schoolhouse

-   Improve and expand geotechnical assessment capabilities including a
    site specific geology database.

-   Initiate collection of signatures and other data associated with
    DTRA hard target defeat testing and demonstrations.

-   Continue development and demonstration of a Sensor Deployment
    Planning Tool.

-   Develop Construction Technology Assessment (CTA) data interface for
    the Underground Targeting and Analysis System (UTAS).

-   Continue research on Conventional Explosives Radio Frequency (CERF)
    as a potential contribution to Bomb Damage Assessment (BDA).

-   Continue DTRA support to the National Signatures Program (NSP).

-   Initiate Systems Engineering and Integration work on potential Find,
    Characterize, Assess (FCA) technologies.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate study of most likely candidates for tactical ground
    sensors.

    **FY 2006 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue to enhance engineering characterization of targets and
    develop improved three-dimensional target models for delivery to
    Combatant Commands and the intelligence community (IC).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Implement UTAS architectural enhancements, computation improvements
    and Information Operations (IO) planning initial operational
    capability.

-   Conduct an additional Underground Vulnerability Assessment
    (Red-Blue-White) exercise.

-   Offer one advanced and four basic Underground Facility (UGF)
    schoolhouse.

-   Begin development of tactical ground sensor for underground facility
    (UGF) characterization and combat assessment.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue remote collection of signatures and other data associated
    with DTRA hard target defeat testing and demonstrations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development and demonstration of a Sensor Planning Tool.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue improvements to geotechnical assessment capabilities.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue DTRA support to the National Signatures Program (NSP).

-   Continue Systems Engineering and Integration work on potential FCA
    technologies.

-   Expand the Construction Technology Assessment (CTA) database.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate development of a UGF specific, lap-top based human
    intelligence (HUMINT) Interview Tool.

# FY 2007 Plans

-   Continue to enhance engineering characterization of targets and
    develop improved three-dimensional target models for delivery to
    Combatant Commands and the intelligence community (IC).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Implement UTAS architectural enhancements, computation improvements
    and Information Operations (IO) planning initial operational
    capability.

-   Conduct an additional Underground Vulnerability Assessment
    (Red-Blue-White) exercise.

-   Offer one advanced and four basic Underground Facility (UGF)
    schoolhouse.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Begin development of tactical ground sensor for underground facility
    (UGF) characterization and combat assessment.

-   Continue remote collection of signatures and other data associated
    with DTRA hard target defeat testing and demonstrations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue development and demonstration of a Sensor Planning Tool.

-   Continue improvements to geotechnical assessment capabilities.

-   Continue DTRA support to the National Signatures Program (NSP).

-   Pursue operational transition of the prototype Sensor Deployment
    Tool.

-   Continue Systems Engineering and Integration work on potential Find,
    Characterize, Assess (FCA) technologies.

-   Expand the Construction Technology Assessment (CTA) database.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiate development of a UGF specific, lap-top based human
    intelligence (HUMINT) Interview Tool.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

  -------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**  **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                             2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**   2010**   2011**

  Project BG Nuclear         61.4     73.4     11.7     17.8     18.4     18.5     20.6     22.4
  Operations                                                                                
  -------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   This program directly reflects the National Military Strategy, the
    dictates of the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the Quadrennial
    Defense Review (QDR) and is directed by the JCS in the Joint
    Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP) Nuclear Annex while laying a
    foundation for potential transformation activities within the
    Nuclear arena as identified in DoD\'s Transformation Planning
    Guidance (TPG).

-   This project encompasses WMD (Nuclear) Protection and Response.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Responsive to the oversight of the Nuclear Weapons Council, the
    project provides critical support to the Combatant Commanders,
    Services, JCS and OSD.

-   This project continues and improves upon the realignment begun by
    DTRA at its inception to deal with the emerging 21st Century
    strategic landscape.

-   This activity is in direct support to the National Military Strategy
    and other national and DoD level documents. These programs will:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Promote initiatives to detect, and attribute the surreptitious
    introduction and use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) against
    the U.S. and its allies thereby protecting our citizens and critical
    infrastructures;

-   Dissuade potential adversaries, whether nations, terrorist groups or
    criminal organizations, from using asymmetric means of war such as
    WMD to counter U.S. conventional weapon superiority;

-   Enhance deterrence and proactively support the agency\'s mission of
    WMD threat reduction.

B.  **Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  WMD (Nuclear) Protection and         14.7     6.1      11.7     17.8
  Response                                                        
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

-   Developed a deployable forensics lab; installed classified
    interagency communications system/communications terminals at
    critical agencies; performed the first-ever simulated nuclear event
    field exercise; formally integrated program plans and improved
    technical/operational procedures at the national level through
    support to DTRA's FBI customer, co-chair of the National Security
    Council (NSC) formed sub-Policy Coordination Committee Attribution
    Working Group; briefed the program to the Vice President in Nov
    2003.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Upgraded Sentry forensics database project.

-   Expanded the SENTRY/SNIPER database.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continued analytical software. Demonstrated software feasibility for
    spectral analysis.

-   Fielded the Multiplatform System (MPS) to the Technical Support
    Groups (TSGs). The MPS was used successfully during OPERATION IRAQI
    FREEDOM (OIF).

-   Continued modernization program of mobile and hand held radiation
    detection units in the Pacific and European Commands.

-   Continued development and fielding of passive and active Special
    Nuclear Material (SNM) detection systems capable of detection in
    cases where SNM is shielded; current detector technologies do not
    perform well when SNM is shielded for gamma and/or neutron
    emissions.

-   Continued to produce through development and adaptive engineering
    detection equipment capable of rapid and standoff detection of
    radioactive materials across a broad spectrum of operational
    environments. Continued to develop equipment that is lighter, more
    rugged, environmentally stable, easy to operate and maintain with a
    longer battery life that can detect radioactivity and/or associated
    signatures.

-   Conducted two radiation detection workshops to solicit new
    technologies/capabilities from the scientific/technical community
    that can be exploited to defeat the nuclear/radiological threat.

-   Continued to integrate through new concept design or adaptive
    engineering multiple detection sensor systems to facilitate standoff
    operator detection of radioactive material and passive or active
    trigger, alarm, destruct, or detection devices targeting the
    operator.

-   Enhanced the establishment of an administrative support structure
    for technical reporting and document production of R&D development
    efforts to permit publication at classified and unclassified levels
    and exploration of existing technologies to eliminate duplicating or
    redundant efforts, and exploit dual or multiple-use technologies.

-   Continued to conduct operational analysis of commercial, vendor,
    \"off-the-shelf\", laboratory-produced concept design, or
    theoretical radiation detection devices in order to determine
    relative efficiencies, capabilities, and technologies to further
    enhance the ability to develop, procure, and employ reliable and
    current technologies for radioactive material detection.

-   Rapidly developed and deployed an underwater array in support of Air
    Force Executive Office (AF/XOS) to meet very specific mission
    requirements.

#### FY 2005 Plans

-   Complete development of the threat device models for Initial
    Operational Capability (IOC); complete development of integrated
    materials and debris database; assist NSC in developing and
    implementing a National Nuclear and Radiological Attribution Program
    Strategic Plan; perform debris analysis, evaluation and reporting
    exercises; complete development of ground sampling robots for IOC.

-   Continue populating SENTRY and SNIPER databases. Start data
    correlation analysis.

-   Continue the development of a ruggedized backpack detector. Perform
    initial operational test and evaluation.

-   Continue the evaluation of lanthanum halides radiation detectors.

-   Continue to improve Sentry forensics database project based on
    previous results and new technology.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete development in the "Domestic Nuclear Event Attribution
    (DNEA) Program of the threat device models for Initial Operational
    Capability; complete development of integrated materials database;
    perform a networked attribution community exercise. Continue the
    development of operational concept for new equipment/systems.

-   Upgrade support to Combatant Commanders Technical Support Groups
    (TSG) with an eye toward transformational opportunities.

-   Expand the development of passive and active Special Nuclear
    Material (SNM) detection systems capable of detection of associated
    signatures in cases where SNM is shielded.

-   Expand the development of adaptive engineering for radiation
    detection equipment capable of rapid and standoff detection of
    radioactive materials to address the Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) threat.

-   Conduct the development of a hand held chemical and biological
    sensor detector and conduct Initial Operational Test and Evaluation
    for use by Special Operations Forces (SOF).

-   Begin development of technology to enhance operator abilities in the
    defeat of High Explosives (HE), Chemical and Biological improvised
    devices.

-   Enhance further operational analysis of commercial, vendor,
    \"off-the-shelf\", laboratory-produced concept design, or
    theoretical radiation detection devices in order to determine
    relative efficiencies, capabilities, and technologies to further
    enhance the ability to develop, procure, and employ reliable and
    current technologies for radioactive material detection. Begin
    search for further revolutionary solutions.

######## 

######## FY 2006 Plans

-   Perform an end-to-end integrated attribution community exercise;
    develop a program validation package for achievement of Initial
    Operational Capability in FY 2006. Continue development of
    improvements to lab radiochemistry processes, sample collection
    techniques, threat device modeling and evaluation, and
    community-wide database for progress towards Full Operational
    Capability (FOC) in FY 2009

-   Continue to improve Sentry forensics database project based on
    previous results and new technology.

-   Continue the population of SENTRY/SNIPER databases.

-   Continue to explore technologies that can improve and/or enhance
    rapid deployable radiation detection and tracking system.

-   Upgrade support to Combatant Commanders Technical Support Groups
    (TSG) to encompass the full spectrum of Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive threats.

-   Enhance the development and fielding of passive and active detection
    systems capable of detection in cases where Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) materials are
    shielded. Improve effort by funding scientific review panel and
    technical support to review studies and proposals to determine
    promising track for transformational opportunities detailed
    research.

-   Continue the development of operational concepts for new
    equipment/systems.

-   Improve and upgrade integration through new concept design or
    adaptive engineering multiple detection sensor systems to facilitate
    standoff operator detection of material and passive or active
    trigger, alarm, destruct, or detection devices targeting the
    detection devices in order to determine relative efficiencies,
    capabilities, and technologies to further enhance the ability to
    develop, procure and employ reliable and current technologies for
    radioactive material detection. Continue search for further
    revolutionary solutions.

#### FY 2007 Plans

-   Perform first flight test of Unmanned Aerial/Air/Aerospace Vehicle
    (UAV) air sampling system; continue development of improvements to
    lab radiochemistry processes, sample collection techniques, threat
    device modeling and evaluation, and community-wide database for
    progress towards Full Operational Capability (FOC) in FY 2009.

-   Continue to improve Sentry forensics database project based on
    previous results and new technology.

-   Continue the population of SENTRY/SNIPER databases.

-   Continue to improve and enhance the development of a rapidly
    deployable Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, High
    Explosive (CBRNE) detection and tracking system, integration of
    detection arrays with satellite communication and analytical
    software, expansion of multi-platform system prototype, and software
    development toward future deployment of attended or unattended
    variants, including mobile, maritime, aerial, and stationary or
    portal.

-   Upgrade support to Combatant Commanders Technical Support Groups
    (TSG) to encompass the full spectrum of Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological, Nuclear, High Explosive (CBRNE) threats.

-   Continue the development of operational concepts for new
    equipment/systems.

-   Enhance the development and fielding of passive and active CBRNE
    detection. Enhance the development of adaptive engineering detection
    equipment capable of rapid and standoff detection of CBRNE materials
    across a broad spectrum of operational environments. Develop
    equipment that without significant degradation is waterproof,
    shockproof, and resistant to extreme conditions and sustained
    employment. Develop lighter weight and smaller detector systems for
    more diverse field employment.

-   Improve and upgrade integration through new concept design or
    adaptive engineering multiple detection sensor systems to facilitate
    standoff operator detection of CBRNE material and passive or active
    trigger, alarm, destruct, or detection devices targeting the
    operator.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Enhance further operational analysis of commercial, vendor,
    \"off-the-shelf\", laboratory-produced concept design, or
    theoretical radiation detection devices in order to determine
    relative efficiencies, capabilities, and technologies to further
    enhance the ability to develop, procure, and employ reliable and
    current technologies for radioactive material detection. Continue
    search for further revolutionary solutions.

  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**            **FY     **FY     **FY     **FY
                                       2004**   2005**   2006**   2007**

  **Classified Program**               46.7     67.3\*   0        0
  ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

(\* FY 2005 includes \$60 million in No Year Funding)

**FY 2004 Accomplishments**

**Classified**

**FY 2005 Plans**

**Classified**

**FY 2006 Plans**

**Classified**

**FY 2007 Plans**

**Classified**

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** Approximately \$43.7M of FY 2004 funding was
obligated with the Department of Energy/Albuquerque Operations Office in
direct support of Project BG -- Nuclear Operations.